Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the
Matrix on the 22nd of December, 2011. For newcomers, as always, help
yourself to the audios, the free audios for download at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You'll see another bunch of sites listed on
that page. If you find sticking on the .com, it's because so many folk go
into it at the same time, try these other sites, the alternate sites.
They all carry transcripts as well, of a lot of the talks that I've given in
English for print-up. And you can go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for
transcripts in other languages. Remember too that you're the audience
that bring me to you, so you can help me by buying the books and discs at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com. It's all on that page how to do it.
And you'll also find that Americans can use personal checks or international
postal money orders to send to Canada, they're still accepted. PayPal is
fine. And some people just send cash. Across the world, Western
Union, Money Gram, and PayPal, once again. Remember straight donations are
also awfully, awfully welcome here.

Now, I try as I say, to chronicle basically the events we're
going through in this big world global system. Very old global push for a
global government, and it goes back an awful long ways. You can find the
histories of it, in fact. It's out in the open now. A lot of the
big players, down through the last couple of hundred years, who've pushed for
this particular type of world government. And you've got to understand
too, in the 1800s, people were really up on science. They thought science
was going to be their savior. And as they were mass manning everybody and
massing everything for the masses and mass production, they also thought they
could manage the masses of the planet by using experts and deciding how to
really run the world. All the things that were obsolete like religions
and marriages and all that kind of stuff would have to go by the wayside.
And out of that came Marxism, which still goes on today under Trotskyism and
various other names. So, we're living through planned changes. And
unfortunately, we're the generation that have to go through them as they do the
big crunch into complete globalism, through treaties, signed yearly, by
whatever government is in, it doesn't matter. They always sign these treaties
through the United Nations that bind all the countries together through the
United Nations, under treaties.

And of course, they have achieved their goal for Europe,
an amalgamated Europe, and a common currency, and don't believe this stuff
about Britain. They'll get back into it, as soon as they want to make the
push. But we're living through, as I say, planned changes. The
United Americas is to come next, as we all crash down too, economically.
Because there's so much money due to pay for all the wars that have been going
on for twenty years solid now. We tend to forget that. Twenty years
of wars. Solid wars, never ending. And theyíll not see an end for a
long time, by the way. Theyíre perpetual wars, is what they call it in
the military, this actual part of the agenda.

So, weíre living through an incredible time of change.
Many of the changes have all happened, the social changes have been awfully
successful, via the media and movies and magazines, to make sure that we canít
go back. Thatís the whole idea. We canít go back to a system that
did work, where people had real communities that the governments had no hand
in, and marriage was at the top of the list too. Back with more, after
this break.

Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt. Weíre Cutting Through the
Matrix. And, as I say, I generally chronicle the events and go back to
the past to show you how they tie in with plans made long ago, because nothing
happens in the big world, in any big, in any major level at all, without
massive, massive planning. Years of planning, in fact. And we know
that all the countries being taken out right now, across the Middle East, were
on the list of the New American Century group, as far back as in the 1990s. So,
itís the same list, and in fact, Rumsfeld and others have congratulated Obama
for carrying on the same list. So, thereís no difference in
parties. Thereís only one party really, and the rest of it is just an
illusion to keep us voting.

As I say, world government is to be the end of all of this,
and under a technocratic society; they call it technocracy. And
technocracy is supposedly a social science. It was somebodyís theory and
idea of how things should be, that a man put into words. It had different
names before that, but itís the same basic theory where experts would guide and
plan the world properly, rather than leaving it haphazard to individuals at the
bottom, who decide when to mate and who to mate with and where theyíre going to
live and all the rest of it. Far easier to get a planned society, where
you train the people gradually, generation by generation, to believe in experts
and then to obey the experts. So, when experts tell you where youíre
going to go and work, youíll just up and go, even if itís on the other side of
the planet, for a global society.

And weíre going through the big changes now. And itís
authoritarian, of course. The Club of Rome said that: Weíre
post-democratic and weíre now in an authoritarian society. Itís very,
very obvious for those who have got eyes to see and ears to hear. And
really, those who canít are perfectly indoctrinated. They still think
theyíre living somehow in the past, you know.

Now, part of it too, and this goes back to the precursor of
the United Nations, the League of Nations, which wanted to inoculate everybody
on the planet for every disease there was, but also too, they mentioned that
they wanted to bring down the population. So I didnít trust them when I
read those books too; they were obviously thinking about depopulating through
ďthis is good for you, take this shot,Ē way back then. And we know that
most of these shots just donít work at all. Actually they make you very
sick, and sometimes permanently too. And Iíve read so many articles on
them, Iíve lost count. But hereís an article here, from the American
Association of Physicians and Surgeons. It says:

Physicians
Oppose Mandatory Flu Vaccine for Health Workers

(Alan:
Now, all those in the health industry are required now, or at least the
government is requiring or demanding they all take the shots. Because,
after all, this is their science, supposedly; and if you donít believe in it,
why are you in the profession? So, theyíre trying to make everyone take
the shot. It says:)

In letters to
Colorado public health officials, the Association of American Physicians and
Surgeons (AAPS) opposes a rule requiring workers in health care facilities to
have an annual influenza vaccination or lose their jobs.

(A: Thereís democracy, eh?)

Workers who
had a rare religious or medical exemption would be required to wear a mask in
patient care areas from November through March.

(A: And this is just to make a laughing stock out
of you, so youíll succumb and accept the jab, you see. Itís like marking
you with an X or something. Same idea. But regardless of that, why
should you need a religious exemption to get out of this anyway?† You see. I mean, why canít you just
say, I donít believe in this thing, Iíve read enough on it that itís bad for
you, and more folk get sick afterwards? And it doesnít prevent the flu
anyway. Thatís good enough, shouldnít it? That should be good
enough. Hereís a study, take this one. Take your pick of all these
studies, that come out every year in March, after itís over.)

The religious
exemption is too narrowly drawn, AAPS writes, and should be a philosophical
exemption, as accepted in many states, to ďto avoid inquisitions into matters
of faith.Ē

(A: Because itís none of their business anyway, is
it?)

The mask
requirement ďseems to be nothing more than a punitive retaliation against those
who decline the vaccineĒ and should be dropped, both immunized and nonimmunized
individuals can transmit influenza or other illnesses.

(A: Actually theyíve found, in all the studies
theyíve done, thereís no difference in the amount of people who get flu,
compared to the group who didnít get the jab, compared to the ones who did get
the jab. Thereís no difference at all across the board. And
actually, when you get the jab, itís not the real flu youíre getting.
Youíre getting a modified flu virus. And itís been altered
genetically. And anything, believe you me, any foreign DNA getting into
your body is going to cause incredible problems, because it then takes over the
cells of your body.)

The New Mexico
study cited in support of the policy shows a tiny effect: an adjusted odds
ratio of only 0.97 for confirmed influenza ďoutbreaksĒ

(A: Now, an outbreak, theyíre classifying now, is
one case. Thatís amazing how you can make an emergency out of nothing,
eh?)

in residents
of long-term care facilities where 60% of direct-care workers were immunized
compared with facilities with a 51% immunization rate. This means that in
facilities where more workers were immunized, residents were still 97% as
likely to get influenza.

(A: There you go. So anyway, it says:)

In the age of
ďevidence-based medicine,Ē AAPS notes that there is surprisingly little
evidence supporting the efficacy of influenza vaccine, and evidence of safety
is also limited. According to a 2006 article in the British Medical Journal by
Tom Jefferson

(A: And itís got the link here to that too.
You can download that.)

the
coordinator of the vaccines section of the Cochrane Collaboration, safety data
are reported in only five randomized studies with 2,963 observations. Many
repeated doses of similar vaccines likely increase the risk of allergic
reactions, and no data exist on the safety of a large number of doses, states
Dr. Orient, citing a 2006 article in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

In other words, this stuff here eventually wrecks your
immune system. And actually all these inoculations you put into your body
do the same thing. Thatís why everybody now has a deficient immune
system. And thatís taught as normal now for people coming out of medical
school. Oh, itís normal we all have a diminished immune system.
Thereís no reason, they have no teaching behind them to tell you why.
They donít know. Itís through the inoculations, itís plummeted since the
1950s. And just escalated through the 60s.

Now, everything now is corrupt. We can see it straight
out, and that is the system for the authoritarian society that the big boys
themselves, just like the Soviet Union, lived awfully well at the top, and they
also give each other deals on everything as well too. So, everything now
is lobbying. And, as Iíve said before, if you want to start a business,
just sniff around. A good psychopath will get it right off the bat.
He doesnít have to be told. He sees whatís popular, whatís coming down
the pike, what theyíre all pushing for, and heíll get grants from the
government to start his own business up, you see. But thatís how you have
to do it today. Thereís no point in hard work, folks. Thereís no
point in hard work at all. Thereís no point in that at all.

Company Who
Lobbied for the NDAA Indefinite Detention Bill

(A: For
Americans, is:)

Given 23
Million Dollar Contract for Night Raid Equipment

(A: So,
the company that lobbied it and then they get this $23 million contract.
It says:)

According to
reports from the Daily Kos and Russia Today, a company specializing in night
raid equipment

(A: Thatís when they want to bust
into your homes, which will escalate actually, when the time is right.)

was awarded a
23 million dollar contract from the Department of Defense and subsequently went
on to lobby for the NDAA which has given the government the power to
indefinitely detain American citizens.

Surefire LLC
openly lobbed for the House version of the NDAA, a bill many have claimed has
effectively ended the Bill of Rights, months after receiving the 23 million
dollar contact from the DOD.

Why would this
company be receiving a contract which could outfit at least 30,000 troops with
new and updated night raid equipment when the U.S. is supposedly pulling troops
out of Iraq and, to a smaller extent, Afghanistan?

Why has this
same company gone on to lobby for a bill that has turned the United States into
a war zone?

Does it seem
likely that the night raid gear that will be provided to the DOD under the 23
million dollar contract will be used outside the United States when the company
who won the contract is lobbying...

(A: Blah, blah, blah. It says:)

As we have
reported in the past, the plans for martial law in America have long been drawn
up and the idea that either our own military, foreign militaryís or a
combination of both will be used against the American people has steadily
gained ground as millions of people around the world have become aware of these
dastardly plans.

Every week it
seems more and more information is released that further proves these plans are
real and already capable of becoming fully operational with 72 hours.

And thatís true, isnít it? Theyíve been at this for
years and years, if you havenít noticed the buildup of a militarized police
force, mainly staffed now with recruits straight from the military, who have
been kicking doors in, on lots of drugs, and theyíre all primed to ďkick assĒ
as they love to say.

And this was from 2009, when the big inspectors for the
nuclear inspectors went into Iran. And this has came out in the papers,
just to remind folk who have forgotten already, because thereís such a massive
barrage now of perpetual propaganda coming out of the war department now, that
people forget that they didnít find anything at all.

'No credible
evidence' of Iranian nuclear weapons, says UN inspector

Mohamed
ElBaradei says Iran was 'on the wrong side of the law' but rejects British
intelligence claims

Mohamed ElBaradei,
director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said British claims
of an Iranian nuclear weapons programme were unfounded.

The UN's chief
weapons inspector, Mohamed ElBaradei, said today he had seen "no credible
evidence" that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, rejecting British
intelligence allegations that a weapons programme has been going on for at
least four years.

The claims and
counter-claims came on the eve of a potentially decisive meeting in Geneva
between diplomats from six world powers and an Iranian delegation about
Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

Iran insists
its programme is for peaceful purposes, and that there is nothing illegal about
a uranium enrichment plant under construction near the city of Qom, the
existence of which was revealed last week.

So, they went through all this stuff and found pretty well
nothing, nothing. But it doesnít matter today. Remember, I read the
article yesterday, from Petraeus and other top generals, talking about the war,
the information war and how itís a war of perceptions and they do it
continuously, the military will be doing it continuously, through your major
media on a daily basis. Weíre in the middle of that right now. Back
with more, after this.

Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt. Weíre Cutting Through the
Matrix. And I just finished an article there about how the International
Atomic Energy commission sent their guys in there. They keep doing it,
into Iran, and they donít find anything, but that one was from 2009, remember
that, 2009. And then, you have another one from 2009. It doesnít
matter what you say, you see. When these guys have made their plans,
nothing is going to change it. Itís just like carbon taxes. Because
they take years planning them, you see.

The former speaker
of the US House of Representatives has said that the US should
"sabotage" Iran's oil and gas infrastructure as part of its efforts
to bring down the government.

(A: This is 2009, as well, right after they were
cleared, Iran was cleared.)

In an interview
with Al Jazeera's Avi Lewis for the Fault Lines programme, Republican Newt
Gingrich said targeting Iran's refinery would spark an economic crisis that
would destabilise the government in Tehran.

He said the US
should "use covert operations Ö to create a gasoline-led crisis to try and
replace the regime".

(A: The regime is elected, remember, democratically
elected over there. They always call them regimes. I wonder what
they are in the U.S.?)

"I think
we have a vested interest, the world has a vested interest, in a responsible
Iranian government, just as we have a vested interest in a responsible North
Korean government," he said.

While Barack Obama, the US president, has
attempted diplomatic engagement with Iran following years of icy relations,
some of his administration's critics have been calling for destabilisation
instead.

So, that was then, 2009, after they had been cleared in Iran
of trying to create weapons, you see. And then you go into yesterdayís
paper from Britain. Remember what Newt Gingrich said, go after all
refineries and so on. It says:

Two American
missiles struck a village in south-west Iran early today.

The news was given in a report by the country's
Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA).

IRNA had said
yesterday that three people were injured when an earlier US missile struck an
oil depot

(A: See,
theyíre going after the oil, just like Gingrich said in 2009, right)

struck an oil
depo in Abadan.

The state-run
news agency also said British and American jets had entered Iranian airspace
several times.

The two
rockets hit Manyuhi village near the border with Iraq's Al-Faw Peninsula, an
Iranian military commander told IRNA.

He gave no
details of casualties or damage.

"In the
border city of Arvand-Kenar, the invading American and British airplanes
violated the airspace of the Islamic Republic of Iran three times," the
commander said.

"In two
cases, two rockets... hit the Manyuhi village."

The governor
of Abadan told IRNA that three people, including a guard at the oil depot, had
been released from hospital after receiving treatment.

Iran has
strongly condemned the US-led military assault on Iraq.

And that will continue, you
see. The same with Syria, right now, theyíve got mass troops buildup on the
Jordanian side, ready for Syria. And so, this is ongoing, you know, this
was planned years ago, years and years ago. At least it was published in
the 1990s, every country that was going to be taken out, you know, and put
under the same farcical pretence system of democracy that we have here, you
see. And you know, thatís how they work these things.

Now, itís so wonderful, you see,
to create chaos, you must create chaos, and generally theyíll do it through
military or a shortage, theyíll create a shortage of something, or itís
financial crisis they set up. And they use these crises to cement things
even further under new treaties, oh, to save us all, weíve all to sign all our
rights away. Over and over again. And weíve been watching this
farce in Europe, for the whole last year here, as they throw all the cash of
every country to prop up Greece or Italy or some other country. And they
borrow this cash to throw at it, and then theyíve got to pay it all back with
massive compound interest, to the same bankers who buy up the bonds.

EU orders
Britain not to send asylum seekers back to Greece because the country is so
broke

(A: So, now you have economic refugees now.
Iíve said that would come. Economic refugees. And it says:)

European Court of Justice rules no EU country can assume it can return
asylum seekers to another member state.

Decision
forbids Britain from returning Afghan man to Greece, even though he came to UK
via that country

†90%
of immigrants who arrive in Europe illegally do so through Greece

(A: It says. So:)

Britain has
been stripped of its power to return asylum seekers to Greece - after a ruling
by European judges.

(A: Well, of course that was going to happen,
because they said youíre not sovereign. Listen to Rompuy that said youíre
not sovereign anymore.† Get over it, he
says. You know.)

The decision
by the Luxembourg court risks plunging the entire European asylum system into
chaos - and leaving border controls in this country hamstrung.

An immigration
watchdog warned the ruling would open a Ďperfect back door into Britainí.

(A: I donít know how many back doors theyíve
got. Itís an awfully drafty place, you know.)

Under EU rules
British officials can return asylum seekers to the first European country they
set foot in.

But today the
European Court of Justice said no-one should be returned to a country if it did
not uphold their Ďfundamental rightsí.

This means
Britain cannot send asylum seekers back to Greece because its asylum system is
such a mess.

The ruling
also opens the door for claims against other countries on the grounds their
asylum systems are not up to scratch.

(A: That means from all over Africa, wherever they
want to come from, they can simply go to Greece first, and then hop over to
Britain and claim asylum, saying they had just come from Greece.)

ĎIn future,
asylum seekers who are not, in fact, genuine will claim that they have come
through Greece, whether or not they have.

ĎIt also
undermines the agreement which provides for asylum seekers to be sent back to
the first EU country...

(A: Etc.)

Around 90 per
cent of illegal immigrants who arrive in Europe do so through Greece

Blah, blah, blah. So, itís just repeating
itself. Anyway, thereís no, see, under this new authoritarian system and
regime, it was never meant to be democratic. The EU was set up to be
authoritarian. And the politicians are just there for the show.
They canít change laws, vote on anything to change, because a secret group at
the top does all that. Back with more, after this.

Hi folks, Iím back, Cutting Through the Matrix. It
was time to let that guitar squeal a little bit, because thatís how you feel
once in a while, just like letting it go, because weíre living in a managed
society, managed perception, everything is managed for us, how we think, what
we think, and what we even do. And itís so well, itís so far advanced, it
works awfully well, I must admit. Hereís an article here from Canada.

AIDS research
Canadian lab gets OK to test vaccine

(A: On humans.)

Canadian
researchers have been given the green light for human testing of an
experimental HIV vaccine, but the initial trial will determine only its safety,
not whether it prevents infection.

(A: Well, you see, that will never prevent
infection, because, they said at the time, it was mutating so quickly, into so
many varieties and strains, that technically, they couldnít get a single
vaccine that would work. But that doesnít matter. Itís big money,
big bucks again. And it says:)

The U.S. Food
and Drug Administration granted approval for researchers at the University of
Western Ontario to test the vaccine, which is based on a genetically modified
killed whole virus.

So, itís a modified, again, virus, with genes added to it
and so on, which theyíll never know what it will do to you, except these guys
who test it on a few people. And itís not guaranteed to do anything for
you. Itís a false sense of security, again. Now, everybody knows,
whoís been listening to the news over the last while:

Americans will
be transferred to foreign prisons under Indefinite Detention act

(A: So, itís rendition, you see.)

If youíre upset
that congressional approval of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 can send you away to military prisons and be tortured in
America, donít worry ó it could be worse.

The US could
send you somewhere else.

No, really.
They could. And they can. Anywhere else, too. Really.

While the bill
that left Capitol Hill last week and awaits authorization from US President
Barack Obama allows for the United States to indefinitely detain and torture
American citizens suspected of aiding enemy forces, one provision in the bill
specifies that that detention doesnít necessarily have to occur domestically ó
nor does it have to be in a foreign prison run by the US.

The ongoing
detention of foreign terror suspects at the US base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba has
been a hot topic since the War on Terror began, with American military
authorities torturing could-be criminals...

(A: Could-be criminals.† Well, we all could be criminals. Governments have already
said that. And without any trial and so on.)

An exposť
years earlier on the Abu Ghraib facility in Iraq revealed how American troops
were subjecting detainees to disgusting, inhumane conditions;

Well, thatís just the culture that you come from now,
because thatís what the big boys gave you. Everybody adopted it, so,
thatís really why thatís happening. And then from Mother Jones, on the
same topic.

Did Congress
Just Endorse Rendition for Americans?

A defense
spending bill that passed both houses of Congress overwhelmingly and is set to
be signed by President Barack Obama as early as this week could make it easier
for the government to transfer American terrorist suspects to foreign regimes
and security forces.

The National
Defense Authorization Act

(A: And a PDF there, it says. You can
download that.† Thatís the whole PDF for
the whole Authorization Act. You can also see too where you know the next
amendments to it are going to be put in very quickly. Thatís what they
always do, put it on the books first and then start amending it.)

Contains a
section that says the president has the power to transfer suspected members and
supporters of Al Qaeda,

(A: I guess thatís the whole of the CIA.)

the Taliban,
or "associated" groups "to the custody or control of the
person's country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign
entity." .

That means if
the president determines you're a member or supporter of Al Qaeda or
"associated forces," he could order you to be handed over to the
Saudis, the Egyptians, the Yemenis ("any other foreign country"), any
of their respective security forces, or even the United Nations ("any
other foreign entity").

(A: And the United Nations is an entity. Itís
not a nation, and itís not even democratic. Itís a private organization)

(You can
read the relevant section of the law in the document viewer at the end of this
article; look for the highlighted annotations.)

Many legal
experts consider the NDAA a congressional codification of war powers the Bush
and Obama administrations have claimed they already possess. David Glazier, a
professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles and expert on the law of war,
argues that Obama already had the power to transfer suspected Al Qaeda members
(even Americans) to foreign custody, and the NDAA simply endorses that view.
"If the president could lawfully transfer a German prisoner of war to a
foreign country, then in theory he could do the same thing with an American
prisoner of war," Glazier explains.

But turning
the Bush and Obama administrations' interpretations of their war powers into an
actual law is "no small thing," as Benjamin Wittes, a legal expert at
the Brookings Institution, explains. Under this law, the government has
far-reaching powers to detain and try terrorist suspects inside or outside the
civilian justice systemóor, if necessary, to transfer them to the custody of
foreign powersóand it will serve as a signal to judges. "When you put all
that in a statute, it becomes a much more permanent fixture of the US justice
system," says Daphne Eviatar, a lawyer with Human Rights First. "It's
not necessarily changing the authority the US government has today, but it's
institutionalizing it."

(A: And thatís the most important part.
Youíre institutionalizing it, until itís common, normalized. Normalized,
you see. Itís part of the whole system, and thatís the danger
there. As I say too, theyíll put amendments on it too, as they want to go
after more and more people, or speaking out about it. Just speaking out
or condemning it or criticizing anything the government is doing, thatís really
where itís all supposed to go eventually. See, the Soviet system were the
ones that we get the term from, anti-government. They used the term
anti-government, direct translation, and they were all, anybody who was
anti-government or labeled as such, was automatically whisked away and
tortured, and then killed. And of course, youíve heard this expression
anti-government, whenever you criticize a policy, youíre now
anti-government. Itís all labels, you see. Lenin said we shall win
by labels and slogans. And itís awfully effective. And thatís what
they want to do, you see.)

Eviatar adds
that there are "a whole lot of scenarios" where the government might
want to transfer a suspected terroristóeven a US citizenóto foreign custody.
For example, the administration might not want to go through the political mess
of determining whether to send a suspect to Gitmo, try him in a military
commission, or use the civilian system. The administration might also want to
avoid the mandatory habeas corpus review that would come if the US held the
suspect itself. In such a case, transferring the suspect to a foreign security
force might present an appealing option.

So, it goes on and on and on. Itís quite a long
article actually. You should read it. Iíll put it up tonight, at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com, the link. And you can download that.
And you can download the whole bill as well. And, as I say, youíll see
the little places where theyíve worded such things so that they can put in
amendments, and you can pretty well imagine what those amendments are going to
be. Very quickly, anti, oh, youíre anti-government. You criticized
Obamaís policy on so-and-so. You understand, if you were anti-government
for criticizing a policy then the whole of the opposition party should be
locked up and whisked away for rendition. Itís so crazy, but thatís how
they do it. They confuse your mind, and most folk get confused awfully
easy. And another article is:

Do Private
Military Contractors Have Impunity to Torture?

(A: See, theyíre going to use a lot of private
military on people shortly within the US, maybe Canada, and theyíve used them
all over the world so far. And the US hires them as well.)

Unbelievably,
in 2011 this question has not yet been settled in the courts of the United
States. Human rights attorneys are headed back to court in the coming month to
argue that, yes, victims of war crimes and torture by contractors should have a
path to justice. Attorneys from my organization, the Center for
Constitutional Rights, along with co-counsel, are representing Iraqi civilians
who were horribly tortured in Abu Ghraib and other detention centers in Iraq in
seeking to hold accountable two private contractors for their violations of
international, federal and state law. By the militaryís own internal
investigations, private military contractors from the U.S.-based corporations
L-3 Services and CACI

(A: CACI is an amazing organization. They
even run schools and everything across the world, and prisons and everything.)

CACI
International were involved in the war crimes and acts of torture that took
place, which included rape, being forced to watch family members and others be
raped, severe beatings, being hung in stress positions, being pulled across the
floor by genitals, mock executions, and other incidents, many of which were
documented by photographs.

You see, that should shock everybody, but it doesnít.
Youíve all seen these movies. Youíve had years and years of movies from
Hollywood, that works with the Pentagon, and youíre desensitized to the things
Iíve just read there. And so, thereís no shock about it. Itís just,
oh, well. A whole generation has grown up now, and theyíre putting on the
uniforms, who have been brought up with these movies. And they look
forward to being the guys that do the raping and the pulling the genitals and
getting their little picture taken, and put it up on Facebook. You
know. ďHereís me, getting the guys, these prisoners to sodomize each
other. Ha, ha, ha.Ē This happened the last time. But you
canít shock folk now. You just canít do it.

Now, in India, which is rapidly pushing forward, with all
the cash itís getting in from all the countries. Weíre sending millions
every year to them, because we must do that under the agreement we signed
through the World Trade Organization. We must pay for them to come up to
a higher standard of living, as we go down the tubes. And so billions,
every country is sending billions off to India, just like we did with China,
same deal. And they can of course export all they want to you, but you
canít export all you want to them. You have to pay high import
duties. They donít. Thatís part of the agreement, as you pay for
their hospitals and education and factories to be built.

Anyway, but the Indians themselves wonít be any better off
than the average Chinese, because in India too thereís a caste system, which is
a class system. And it wonít change. In fact, theyíll just get more
stinking rich at the top and even poorer at the bottom. But they want
everyone, and theyíre talking about the average person there:

Indians are
signing their life away for a biometric ID Card

(A: This is the law that theyíre pushing in India.)

The people of India are signing their own death
warrants as they agree to sign up to their governments ID card system, claiming
it will help cut fraud for benefit payments.

(A: Thatís how they get the poor, eh. You get
benefit payments and weíll know itís you. Like they didnít know it was
you already.)

The real
reason is to help the New World Order...

Etc, etc, etc. So, itís a test case given all to them
first, before they bring it over to the welfare recipients. Thatís how
they start in first world countries. Same with fingerprinting too.
So, Iíll put that link up as well.

But weíre on a roll, itís a rampaging roll. This is
the time of fast-paced change, because if you had a period of grace, where you
had a few years to think things over and your mind starts working again, and
you stop watching the news and you can think for yourself, thatís dangerous,
you see. They want you to be on a roll, a roller coaster, where your mind
is just driven as the perception managers manage your mind completely.
Thatís what they want. And itís far better. When youíre in shock,
you see, shock and awe is also a technique of media, bombardment and perpetual
war. And when youíre in that state, youíre very suggestible. You
canít, you donít get time to reason things through. You canít remember
things very well, because it seems to be new pieces coming out all the
time. Just like say, 2009, Iran was cleared of any attempt to make atomic
weaponry. But that doesnít matter. Today itís oh yeah they are,
yeah they are, sure they are, somebody says so. And thatís all they have
to say, somebody says so in the war department. And you canít remember
anything anymore.

So, when youíre stampeding, thatís when the big boys can
change, massive social changes. Remember what Carroll Quigley said, you
can get more done on a social change level in five years of war than fifty
years of peace, using propaganda. You can stampede the people in times of
war. Economic collapse. Oh, my God, theyíre bombing all over the
world. Oh, my God, oh, theyíre going to arrest Americans. Oh, my
God, and itís just endless, you see. This is how they do it, shock and
awe. It wasnít designed simply for physical bombardments from the
air. It wasnít.

Now, Iím going to go to the callers, and thereís some
callers I think coming in, or have come in, and Iíll see who they are.
And thereís Aaron from Nevada hanging on there. Are you there, Aaron?

Aaron: Yes, Alan, thank you very much.† Okay, a couple things. One, I have
this little internet show Iíve been doing for about a year, and a website that
goes with it, so I put this tracking software, so I could check out the
visitors, you know. And Iíd only had it up about a week and I noticed I
was getting a lot of visitors from like Tel Aviv, and then, I began getting
visits from the United States State Department. And you know, I got
really paranoid. I was like, I have a tiny little thing, you know, that
Iím doing for the alt media, and somehow or another, itís attracted attention
of the United States State Department. So, I got really paranoid. I
tore the website down. And I just wanted to get your sense of what you
think about that, and secondly, I was just wondering if you had any thoughts on
what Benjamin Fulford came out with in the past couple weeks about this lawsuit
thatís been filed by some Chinese against the Federal Reserve, and all kinds of
other stuff. So, those are the two things.

Alan: Well, Iím not surprised. If youíve got what they
call sensitive information in other words, meaning, anything to do with the US
policies abroad, or Israel as well, because itís tied at the hip, the two
policies are tied at the hip, the whole Middle East is tied at the hip to do
with Israel today and the US. Thereís no doubt about it. And all
the public statements put out in the mainstream to do with that as well, we are
friends and allies with Israel. Theyíve never said why theyíre allies but
theyíre friends and allies. So, thatís just a given. Regardless, if
you mention it, even though the mainstream has mentioned it, and even if youíre
reading an article from the mainstream or giving a link, they will definitely
look into it, because theyíre so well organized, both sides, to automatically
track anything that mentions them. So, that just goes with the territory
of sticking your head up out of the foxhole, and thereís nothing you can really
do about it. A lot of your security equipment by the way, your
anti-spyware, etc, is owned by Israel. So, thereís different ways to find
out what youíre up to anyway. I donít think thereís any privacy today at
all, like Assange said. There really is none. The computer is there
for their use, those who rule us, governments and all, as opposed to your
personal freedom, even though they like to call it personal computer, just to
con you.

And with Fulford, I canít really take him too
seriously. Because remember, he came out with all the Triads in China
were going to riot and go after ďthe IlluminatiĒ, etc. And it was just
all too crazy and fishy for me. So, in this day and age too, it doesnít
matter. Iíve seen so many articles here on different groups going to sue
politicians, etc. Never happens. If it does, they always get off
with it, and thereís no real point to it really in other words. It goes nowhere.

See, weíre post-democratic. Weíre post pretty well
everything that gave us rights. We donít have really rights today, as far
as I can see. So, all these lawsuits, forget it. I mean the whole
justice system is completely controlled in every country now, so much so that
when something should cause outrage, like when Monsanto does put farmers out of
business, like happened in Canada, the first one was a Canadian out west, and
the judge actually said to him, I donít care how it got on your land, whether
it blew over or a bird pooped it into your soil, he says, itís on your land and
Iím fining you massive amounts of money. And eventually they put the guy
out of business. Thatís the justice system. Itís not what youíve
been taught itís there for. Never was, actually.

Back with more, after this break.

Hi folks, Iím back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And
weíll take Jane from Ontario. Are you there, Jane? Hello, Jane?

Jane: Yes, can you hear me?

Alan: Yeah, go ahead.

Jane: Okay. I was going to talk about something else,
but then this is quicker I think. You mentioned governments; I forget
exactly how you worded it, something about governments, criticizing
governments, how thatís supposed to be such a terrible thing. It made me
think of, there was a well publicized murder trial that I was following.
And I had actually followed the whole missing person, turned murdered person,
leading up, like in the years leading up to the trial. And Iím pretty
sure the wrong person was tried and he turned out to be convicted as
well. But the defence, during the trial, implied that a witness had been
coached by the prosecution. And the prosecution said, the defence is
attacking the government. You know, and I just thought, well thatís just
crazy, because itís always the government, right? The prosecution is
always the government, really.† So that
almost sounds like you canít really defend yourself, doesnít it?

Alan: Well, you canít really. If they want you,
theyíll get you on something. Itís just like setting up the cards,
stacking the cards against Iran, and churning out propaganda, until in most
peopleís minds, well, I guess they deserve it. And theyíre completely
ignorant of any of the facts. Itís as easy as that. But in the
legal system, most of the cases are dealt with before they get into court,
between lawyers and judges and so on. Anything thatís a sticky topic,
theyíve already had advice from much, much higher authorities than the legal
system and government itself. So, itís not as free as you think it is,
where decisions are made on the spot.

Jane: Do you think both sides are, like the defence, if the
person is supposed to be guilty than the defence is kind of told, ďlook, donít
tryĒ?

Alan: Oh, you can actually tell it, and in fact, thereís one
case, one guy in Ireland who was up for really sedition and treason, and I
talked about him on this broadcast, and he got this defence guy in Ireland, and
the guy literally didnít stand up for him at all. But he gave them all
these signs, to the judge and so on, all these Masonic signs, which they
do. Itís awfully quite funny walking into court and watching this
stuff. You should do it once in a while, if youíre near a court, just go
in and watch them. And youíll see the gestures they have, and where they
put the hand on the head, and these are all Masonic signals theyíre giving each
other in passing. And I remember too thereís guy that got off in Canada,
after being stuck inside for fifteen years I think for a murder he didnít commit,
and through DNA supposedly, they found out he didnít do it. They probably
knew it all along, but he said about his court case, he says, I didnít get to
say anything in the court he said. And this is generally what
happens. In fact, youíre told by the judge to shut up. And two
lawyers do all the so-called debating on law. And he said, I felt like an
object, he said, just sitting watching, you know, a show put on by other
people. He was an object. He wasnít a person anymore. He
wasnít even. It was like someone elseís trial, you know.

Jane: Yeah. Oh, I just want to say, Happy
Saturnalia.

Alan: Thatís right. Itís Saturnalia indeed. It
will be Saturnalia. It will keep some people happy. And no doubt
all the New Agers will be practicing their different things this weekend.
Mind you, they canít go around naked in the snow, unless theyíre awfully
sturdy. Yep, thatís true. Unless theyíre all inside in some big
hall somewhere. They can get some fake snow inside, you know, and do
their business. And maybe, hopefully, change the world for the
better. Somebody has to do it, right? Ha, ha, ha. But thanks
for calling in. And from Phil and Ryan, maybe you can call next
week. From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and
may your god or your gods go with you. And Iíll be back on Tuesday
actually. Thereís two good shows for tomorrow and Monday already
pre-selected. So, Iíll see you back Tuesday.