HOW MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WILL BE MURDERED BY BLACKS TODAY?..........THE LOOTING ACROSS AMERICA is as black as the staggering murder and crime rates of BLACKS ACROSS AMERICA. Black Lives Matter? NO LIFE MATTERS TO BLACKS!

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

JACK WISDOM - ISLAMOPHILIA - A NEUROTIC REACTION AGAINST THE TRUTH - This is the exaggerated love of Islam and of followers of Islam based upon a desire to bring death and destruction to Christians, Jews, and even those secularists who remain loyal to Judeo-Christian morality.

This is the exaggerated love of Islam and of followers of Islam based upon a desire to bring death and destruction to Christians, Jews, and even those secularists who remain loyal to Judeo-Christian morality.

Islamophilia: A Neurotic Reaction Against Truth

Pamela Geller recently reported on the murders of 120 Christians in Nigeria since February of this year. This is the tip of the iceberg of attacks on churches and Christians throughout the world by Islamists who are crying for the blood of Christian martyrs. Many leftwing atheists then call those who vigorously protest this bloodshed “Islamophobes.” In effect, they are allowing and even encouraging the militant Islamists to continue their violent acting out.

The sympathy with Islamic jihadists is the necessary perverse outcome of a deep mental illness which I diagnose and call Islamophilia. This is the exaggerated love of Islam and of followers of Islam based upon a desire to bring death and destruction to Christians, Jews, and even those secularists who remain loyal to Judeo-Christian morality. It is an overidentification with the mindset that wishes to destroy Anglo/American liberty based on natural rights, and with the deep, Western attachment to personal autonomy and private property. The natural [and inalienable] rights of our Anglo-American civilization are, according to our Declaration of Independence, endowed by our Creator. These rights are Biblical rights found in Scripture, and moved forward by God’s holy providence into the natural realm of human governance.

In short, the leftist brigades of our culture are sublimating their vendetta of hate for natural rights and for Christian faith (deeply tied to Old Testament teachings and faith) through vicarious identification with the violent Islamic jihadist machinations against non-Islamic societies, cultural subgroups, and governments.

Islamophilia, not Islamophobia, is the greatest threat to the peace and tranquility of western civilization. Like many of the other “-philias,” it is a deeply irrational disturbance which functions by exaggerating the merits of a class of beings (Islam) in order to distract from a realistic assessment of that class or aggregate. Pedophilia, for example, is an irrational and perverse sexual attraction of adults to children. Pedophilia is defined as “a psychiatric disorder” involving adult sexual fantasies and activities with children. Another more detailed definitionstates that pedophilia is “…legally defined as sexual child abuse.” Therefore, we can say that disorder, deviance, and abuse are the defining characteristics of the term Islamophilia that is being advanced in this article.

Another perverse “-philia” is necrophilia. Necrophilia is defined as “A morbidfondness for being in the presence of dead bodies. [and] The impulse to have sexual contact, or the act of such contact, with a dead body, usually of men with female corpses.” Sex in these cases means that there is no reciprocal passion. The necrophiliac expresses erotic desires toward the dead, and the dead, being dead, express nothing back. They are, well, dead… Now we have five working concepts for understanding Islamophilia: disorder, deviance, abuse, morbidity, and perversity.

Douglas Murray, Deputy Editor of the Spectator in the United Kingdom, has coined the term Islamophilia. But he uses criteria to define the term which treats the Islamophiles of the press and of the left as though they were only expressing a form of wrongheadedness, but does not draw us into this “-philia” as being a neurotic manifestation of some deep pathologies.

For example, he states that Islamophilia is a “disproportionate adoration of Islam.” In making this statement, he fails to call the reader’s attention to the perversity of this “disproportion.” After 1400 years of attacks on the West, both Europe and the USA, as well as attacks on non-Islamics in many other Christian and non-Christian countries, we see that enjoyment of worship of Allah is not uppermost in their minds. Rather, religious/political conquest of all other peoples is the driving motive of Islam and wedded to their beliefs.

All other world religions make some significant peace claims, but Islam fails to do so. Failure to acknowledge this historical reality means that the Islamophile’s defensive response in support of Islam is not only disproportionate, but is deviant and disordered. Its main goal is to harass the Christians and to disabuse the West of the idea that its Christian and Jewish foundation is valid. Experiencing Christianity as a form of cultural abuse, they wish, in turn, to abuse Christians. Islam is intended as the instrument of that abuse by the non-Islamic Islamophiles.

Murray also states, “But when it comes to Christianity, it appears that you cannot uphold its doctrines without immediately being accused of obscurantism or bigotry. This results from a profound disdain in intellectual circles towards the religions underpinning the West, and a corresponding exaggerated respect for what are presumed to be the cultures of the underdeveloped world.” This observation is certainly true, as the negative response to Christianity in all its manifestations (Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant) produces an adoration of Islam not founded on respect for its principles, but on antipathy towards Christian faith and the Father, Creator of Heaven and Earth and all that resides therein. Christ is hated by Islamophiles. Thus, the Islamophile is perverse insofar as his or her attraction to Islam is a pseudo-attraction based more upon hatred of Christianity than love and respect for the Islamics.

Additionally, Murray notes, “The media… could never broadcast, or print… an article explaining from the Christian -- or any other -- point of view why Islam’s founding story simply doesn’t stack up… Let any scholar loose on the materials and they could do it. Biblical or Torah scholars using the tools of criticism could use them on the Koran and have a wonderful and fascinating time of it.” Thus, he rightly sees the unwillingness of the MSM to run in the public square critiques of Islam from the point of view of other religions to thereby help the public see the issues. In fact, writers like Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, Raymond Ibrahim, Daniel Pipes, Jamie Glazov, Daniel Greenfield, David Horowitz, Martin Sherman, Mordecai Kedar, and Steve Emerson are marginalized to the highest degree possible. The Islamophiles thus want to remain in ignorance of both Christianity and of Islam. In so doing, they are promoting their own ignorance along with public ignorance. They are thereby encouraging morbid thoughts of hatred founded not on knowledge but upon continuing ignorance.

“Islamophiles” have been using the term Islamophobia to slander those who want to defend our culture from the false, non-Christian religion of Islam bent on conquest of the West and of all other cultures. From now on, those using the term Islamophobia must immediately be addressed as neurotic Islamophiles. Public use of terminology to indict false positions is essential in the culture wars. The left often has been successful in stigmatizing the views of patriots who oppose them. New initiatives need to be taken so the left will experience the shoe on the other foot. Conservatives must not only express opposition, but create opposition. Just as the left hopes to stigmatize those with whom they disagree by using the term Islamophobia, they should be stigmatized by use of the term Islamophilia.

MI5: Number of Far Right Terror Cases ‘Absolutely Dwarfed by the Number of Islamist Cases’

The number of far-right terror cases the authorities are faced with is “absolutely dwarfed” by the number of cases related to radical Islam, according to Britain’s Security Service, better known as MI5.

MI5 specialises in counter-espionage and domestic security, in contrast to the foreign intelligence-oriented Secret Intelligence Service – better known as SIS or MI6, made famous by Ian Flemming’s James Bond books. The assessment of the relative seriousness of the Islamist terror threat and the far-right terror threat was disclosed halfway through a Guardianreport focusing heavily on the latter, later republished by other media outlets including CNN and Microsoft-owned MSN.

The left-liberal newspaper led on claims by the far-left HOPE Not Hate organisation, which describes itself as “anti-fascist” and has previously received funding from billionaire open borders campaigner George Soros, that “huge numbers of Britons are among the global audience for far-right forums” online.

The Guardian also quoted Britain’s anti-extremism “tsar”, Sara Khan, regarding the “frightening amount of legal extremist content online” which the left claim is fuelling far-right extremism. The comments suggest a clampdown on online anonymity and uncensored discussion groups may be on the cards.

Halfway through the article, however, the Guardian concedes that, while the security services “have not revealed how many of the 700 or so live terror plots and 20,000 individuals classified as ‘closed subjects’ … are related to right-wing extremism”, MI5 did disclose that such cases are, quote, “absolutely dwarfed by the number of Islamist cases” being dealt with.

This is the case despite the fact that Britain’s white population, from which white nationalist extremists are presumably likely to recruit, is in excess of 50 million, while the Muslim population, from which Islamist extremists are likely recruiting, is officially only 2.7 million – suggesting the radical Islamism presents a much more potent threat than the far right in terms of its capacity to radicalise people.

Nevertheless, the British authorities have placed a huge degree of emphasis on tackling the far right since even before Christchurch, with Cabinet minister Amber Rudd warning that people viewing what she described as “far-right propaganda” online could face up to 15 years’ imprisonment under harsh new counter-extremist penalties while she was still at the Home Office.

The measures drew some criticism from Max Hill QC, then terrorism legislation watchdog, now Director of Public Prosecutions for England and Wales, who warned that the Government should not “criminalise thought without action or preparation for action,” and that “the struggle for national security must not be used as a stick to beat down the rights we hold dear.”

Jihad: Islam's Engine

Right
from the start, violent jihad served as the engine of Islam under the command
and supervision of Muhammad himself. To understand how quickly Islam
spread around the world, we must see the timeline of Islam.

After
Muhammad's death in 632 A.D., his friend Abu Bakr was named caliph and
ruler of the Islamic community, or Ummah. Muhammad's followers in a
short time occupied a vast geographic area; conversion to Islam was
heightened by Islamic missionaries, who intermingled with local
populations to promulgate the Islamic teachings. It resulted
in Islam's spread outward from Mecca toward both
the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the creation of the
Muslim world.

In
no time at all, Islam spread like a pandemic. Once it attacked the
mind of its victims, this debilitating disease was capable of transforming them
into helpless pawns that had no choice but to execute what they were directed
to do.

Here
is the truth, as bitter as it may be. Islam is the
culprit. Islam is anything but a religion of
peace. Violence is at the core of Islam. Violence is
institutionalized in the Muslim's holy book, the Qur'an, in many verses:

Qur'an:
9:5: "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them
captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of
war."

Qur'an:
9:112: "The Believers fight in Allah's cause; they slay and are slain,
kill and are killed."

Qur'an:
8:39: "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief
[non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole
world)."

Qur'an:
8:65: "O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are
twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there
are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels
are a people devoid of understanding."

Qur'an:
9:38: "Believers, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to
go forth and fight in Allah's Cause you cling to the earth? Do you
prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? Unless you go forth,
He will afflict and punish you with a painful doom, and put others in your
place."

That's
what the Qur'an commands the believer repeatedly – to make jihad on even the people
of the book, Jews and Christians. Islam
essentially invented the idea that Christians, Jews, and pagans are an
abomination and offensive to Allah and that their very existence represents an
attack upon the self-defined Islamic right to reign over the
world. Allah thus enlists Muslim believers to eradicate by force
those who offend him and, by disbelieving, prevent his rule. True
Muslim believers therefore become the enforcers, hit men and mercenaries for
their god, in order to establish a global caliphate for their parasitic
clergy. Their targets are artificially constructed adversaries.

Muslim
believers hence are instructed to fear the "great Satan" and are told
that if they do not live up to Allah's calls to jihad, they themselves are
offensive to Allah and to their families.

Now,
the only question that remains is the extent of a Muslim's obedience to the
Qur'an and the Sunna, the life examples of Muhammad. To be sure, a
great many Muslims are not following the dictates of the Qur'an verbatim, as
they should, since they consider it to be the literal immutable perfect words
of Allah.

Furthermore,
nowhere do I say all Muslims believe in shedding the blood of
others. Yet the commandments of the Qur'an to believers are clear
and emphatic. It is for this reason that an innumerable number of
Muslims do engage in jihad and suicide volunteers vie with one
another to offer their services to their handler leaders.

A
true Muslim does not and cannot believe in freedom of choice. In the
religion of Islam – Submission – everything is up to Allah, as clearly and
repeatedly stipulated in the Qur'an. The raison
d'être for the Muslim is to be unconditionally submissive to the will
and dictates of Allah. Everything a "good" Muslim does is
contingent upon the will and decree of Allah, he is indoctrinated to believe.

To
cut to the chase, we need to eliminate some disinformation and myths about the
"war on terror." We are not fighting
terrorism. We are engaging in an ideological battle between freedom,
conservatism, democracy, individual rights, capitalism, and "Christian"
ethics and Islamofascism, communism-socialism, theocracy, and tyranny.

There
are also internationalist, dictatorial, globalist forces that seek to use the
conflict to create an international government and the unification of all
religions by the destruction of nationalism, patriotism, individual rights, and
sectarianism.

It
is not "fanatical," "radical," or "extreme" Islam
that we are fighting, but normal, orthodox, canonical, typical, accepted,
traditional Islam, straight from the mouth of Muhammad. Islam is
violent in direct proportion to its mission and scripture. The
so-called fanatics and terrorists are only upholding the truth of their
principles.

In
short: We must begin to declare Islam evil, not from a sectarian perspective,
but from a universal, humanist one. Every encroachment of Islam as a
religion must be rejected and discouraged by all people
everywhere. Any leftist who attempts to give aid and comfort to this
religion of hate must be denounced and frustrated at every
turn. Otherwise, get used to your radioactive suit and your fallout
shelter, a standard of living – and a level of freedom – one tenth of what you
have today.

This book documents the history of
horrors, violence, brutality, oppression, conquests by the sword, beheadings of
hundreds of thousands (probably millions), destruction of civilizations and
cultures, corruption, deception, and lies that are part of the Islamist
culture, and every other evil that you can imagine that one group of humans
could impose on others in the name of an ideology or, in this case, a
pseudo-religion. The book is a comprehensive history of the role of
war and terror in the spread of Islam, and the book details 1,400 years of
sheer evil with no relief, imposed on the Middle East, Eastern Europe, North
Africa, the Iberian Peninsula, India, and Asia. The only let-up in
these killings that ever came was when some of the cultures and
civilizations successfully repulsed the monsters, or else were conquered and
then violently and rapidly subdued.

Spencer briskly traces the 1,400-year war
of Islamic jihadis against the rest of the world, detailing the jihad against
Europe, including the 700-year struggle to conquer Constantinople; the jihad in
Spain, where non-Muslims fought for another 700 years to get the jihadi
invaders out of the country; and the jihad against India, where Muslim warriors
and conquerors wrought unparalleled and unfathomable devastation in the name of
their religion.

Spencer adds to the drama and impact by telling much of the tale in the words
of contemporary chroniclers themselves, both Muslim and non-Muslim. The
History of Jihad shows that jihad warfare has been a constant of
Islam from its very beginning, its major focus. In fact, in
reading the stories and considering the historical realities, it is safe to say
that the Islamists were constantly on the hunt and constantly bloodthirsty –
thirsty for conquest and focused on plunder. That is what proves
that the history of Islamism is consistent with present-day jihad terrorism,
and that present-day jihad proceeds along exactly the same ideological and
theological foundations as did the great Islamic warrior-states and jihadi
commanders of the past.

The book is worthwhile now as a lesson in history in an age when Islamic
jihadis are more assertive in Western countries than they have been for
centuries, and propaganda and deception are tools well developed in a culture
that approves of deception and promotes conquest. Taqiyya is
the Muslim word for approved deception of the non-believer, which raises the
question for today: at which point can a non-Muslim trust
the promise of a jihadi or any Muslim?

Read this book and understand that
faithful and observant Muslims are part of the jihad, as commanded by Islam and
Allah, whether armed or not, and thus cannot be assumed to be
"peaceful" since Islam is all about conquest at any cost and
oppression or destruction of the kafir non-believer
(infidel). Consider the attitude of Islamists for the non-believer
in this 1,300-plus-year saga that extends all the way into the early
21st century – the Muslim philosophy that is nothing but hair-on-fire
murderous when directed at non-believers. That is why beheading is
so common among their jihadis. They hate, and they want to strike
terror in the hearts of their enemies. Their enemies are anyone who
is not a Muslim.

With this logic, an easy argument to make
is that there is no place for national loyalties in the mind of a Muslim –
and in fact, one of the internal conflicts in Islam itself is
its rejection of secular, or less than sharia law,
nations. However, a method for conquest that includes some deception
is approved by Islam, and when a Muslim swears an oath to the United States, for
example, it is a deception for the benefit of the conquest, and
that certainly that would be approved by Allah. Muhammad
himself broke treaties and lied to advance his cause, and he clearly taught
that deception to advance the cause of Islam is not immoral, but to be promoted
and utilized for jihad.

This brings us to today.

This book is indispensable to
understanding the geopolitical situation of the twenty-first century and
ultimately to formulating strategies to deal with the Islamist threat and defeating
radical Islamist terror.

It's critical to know and understand this
for context, yet that's not being done. It's certainly not being
done by the wimpy Western intellectuals and politicians, intimidated by the
well-developed Islamic propaganda machine.

Knowing the enemy is essential to survival
and victory. To underestimate a threat and the nature of the enemy
is suicide. Spencer has long been the leading historian of the
nature of Islamic violence and conquest, and now he's telling the story of
the monstrous movement that is Islam. His grasp of the history
of, and the important events and figures within, Islam from the beginnings to
the present is unexcelled. In reading this book, it's obvious he is
the go-to guy for scholarship on the theology, or what is more properly the
ideology dressed up like theology, of Islam as we can see it.

It's also important that he be listened
to. These days, it is taken for granted, even among many
Washington policymakers, that Islam is a fundamentally peaceful religion and
that Islamic jihad terrorism is something relatively new, a product of the
economic and political ferment of the twentieth century. It's not
true. In The History of Jihad, Spencer proves
definitively that Islamic terror is as old as Islam itself, as old as Muhammad,
the prophet of Islam, who said: "I have been made victorious through
terror." He had been a highwayman and terrorist for years
before he founded his religion, dying in 632.

Reading the details of the killings is not
only alarming, but exhausting. I learned that some Islamist leaders
spent all their time killing and torturing people and taking woman and children
as slaves, both sex slaves and house slaves.

I also learned that Islam had a limited
economic base – effectively confined to conquest and
slavery. Muslims were effectively a criminal enterprise, and
anything they acquired of value came from the end of a sword or the threat
of death or torture.

The book is a long serial of bloodbaths
and terrorist outrages.

I challenge any reader to keep track of
the killers and the magnitude of the killing (millions died) in places such
as North Africa and the Asian subcontinent, or the number of churches,
shrines, temples of the non-believers destroyed and replaced with
mosques. Civilizations decimated – it is a disgusting thing, Islam,
and to keep track of the appalling conduct requires copious note-taking
and remains difficult to grasp. Spencer tells a terrible tale,
indeed, yet all Western intellectuals can do is talk about the conduct of
the crusaders.

The Spencer book will cure the reader of
that silly nonsense. One reads too many stories in the book of
Muslim victors doing mass executions of enemies to have any fury left for
crusaders. Muslim conquerors were positively steeped in violence and
bloodshed – stacking the heads of their enemies high and raping all of
their women, executing hundreds of thousands, and far more than can be
accurately counted.

I spent uncomfortable hours reading the of
the horrors of Islam and sometimes had to take a break from the bloodletting –
it is and was a movement of prodigious killing and torture – but then one must
remember that it is an ideology and a movement built on terror. If
you hang in and wade through the gore and the blood, which is the main
story for more than 400 pages, you will realize that the Islamist conquest was
rivaled only by communism in the number of people annihilated and the
civilizations destroyed, by terror, torture, oppression. Only a
fanatic ideology can produce killing and evil on this prodigious scale.

Most important, Spencer is our ally in the
war against the evil and treacherous phony "religion" that is nothing
more than a corrupt ideology of conquest, xenophobia, and
misanthropy. What is unfortunate is that people don't pay attention
to Spencer, who can, in a wink, extinguish the idea that Islam is a religion,
and with certainty demonstrates that it has no place in any credible vision of
peace, as the Western politicians and intellectuals have claimed and as so
many leftists continue to babble on about. To try to make a case for
Islam as a religion of peace after reading what Islamists did for the last
1,400 years is nonsense. Spencer underlines that Islam, and its practitioners,
above all, are all about conquest.

A TINY
MINORITY OF HALF A MILLION JIHADISTS

Islamic terrorists are the world’s eighth
largest military.

Islamic terrorists are a “tiny minority of extremists”. That’s the
message we’ve been hearing ever since 9/11. They’re only a handful of “guys in
a cave” or a few “lone wolves” radicalized over the internet.

How tiny is that tiny minority?

According to a study by
the Center for Strategic and International Studies, there are 230,000
Jihadists.

Put this tiny minority of extremists together in a city and you
would have Boise, Idaho, or Richmond, Virginia, or Des Moines, Iowa. But that’s
not a roster of Muslim civilians who support Islamic terrorism, just active
members of terrorist groups. And so a better point of comparison is to national
armies.

At 230,000, Sunni Islamic Jihadists outnumber the British Armed
Forces (149,000), the French Armed Forces (117,000), and Germany's Bundeswehr
(179,753). That should be troubling since those are some of the militaries and
countries on the front lines of Europe’s reluctant fight against Islamic
incursions.

The list of Sunni fighters has a lot of questions marks and is incomplete.
Sunnis outnumber Shiites, but under the Iranian umbrella, Shiites have fielded
sizable terror forces in Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen.

Hezbollah in Lebanon boasts between 25,000 to 65,000 Jihadists.
The Houthis in Yemen, currently the beneficiaries of a massive propaganda
campaign in the media, have around 25,000 to 30,000 Jihadists. Iraqi PMU’s add
another 90,000 to 150,000 Jihadists to these numbers. And finally there’s
Iran’s own Revolutionary Guard, a regional terror hub with another 120,000
members.

These numbers add between 260,000 and 365,000 Jihadists on the
Shiite side for a total of over half a million Sunni and Shiite Jihadists
making Islamic terrorists the world’s eighth largest military.

That’s not a tiny minority of extremists and it’s not a few guys
in a chat room or a cave.

This dark army of terror grew by leaps and bounds under the Obama
administration which fractured Sunni countries by overthrowing their
governments in and bringing Islamists to power in the Arab Spring, while the
Iran nuke deal fed and freed up billions for Iran to invest in Shiite
expansionism.

The CSIS report notes that the
number of Salafi Jihadists and allied terror groups more than doubled between
2008 and 2016. Despite the Iraq War, during Bush’s second term, the increase
was fairly light. The stratospheric increase, from the thirties to the sixties,
took place during the Obama years.

The estimated number of Jihadist fighters rose from a high of
100,000 in 2008 to 250,000 in 2016.

The mass deaths in Syria, Libya and Yemen (to name some of the
worst Arab Spring trouble spots) are a direct result of the policies and, in Libya
of the military intervention, of the Obama administration.

Lefty twitter brims with propagandas photos of supposed Yemeni
children starving to death. The media has tried to blame the religious war
between Sunnis and Shiites (and their Saudi and Iranian backers) on President
Trump. But dead children in Yemen are the wages of the foreign policy of Hope
and Change.

As the Democrats and the Republican foreign policy establishment
advocate for Jamal Khashoggi, intervention in Syria and support for the Palestinian
Authority, it is urgent to remember that these are the same old failed policies
that led to a 150% increase in Jihadists and killed over 500,000 people in
Syria, and cost the lives of tens of thousands more in Yemen and Libya. And
elsewhere in the region.

“Democratization” is a poisoned Islamist chalice. At its cloudy
bottom lie terror and death.

The media has accused President Trump of a callous indifference to
human life for putting American national interests ahead of Khashoggi, an
Islamist pal of Osama bin Laden. But it’s the media radicals whose horrid
idealism put half a million people into the ground in the service of the
region’s Islamists.

Khashoggi’s Islamist political agenda killed enough people to
qualify as its own genocide.

Half a million dead and half a million Jihadists rampaging around
the world are the outcome of an idealistic foreign policy in which chattering
class lefties allowed Islamists like Khashoggi to call the shots. The tiny
minority of extremists was never that tiny, but it grew to a monstrous size
with massive infusions of cash and military interventions plotted by Islamists
and implemented by Washington D.C.

Many of the 70,000 Jihadists in Syria were directly or indirectly
funded by the Obama administration. As were many of the 5,000 Jihadists in
Libya, where Obama’s illegal military intervention led to everything from a
near Al Qaeda takeover of Mali to the flow of surface-to-air missiles to Hamas
terrorists.

Major terror groups and state sponsors of terror from Pakistan to
Iran to the Palestinian Authority also saw huge cash transfers from American
taxpayers to Islamic terrorists.

In his first year in office, Obama signed off on a $7.5 billion
aid package for Pakistan. The Islamic terror state repaid us by harboring Osama
bin Laden and aiding Islamic terrorists killing American soldiers.

This year, President Trump made drastic cuts to foreign aid to
Pakistan after tweeting, “The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more
than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us
nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools.”

We’re still foolishly funding Jihadists, including the tens of
thousands of members of the Palestinian Authority’s security forces, even after
their leader, Abbas, called for the destruction of the White House.

CSIS doesn’t list the Islamic terror militias in the Terrorist
Occupied Territories in Israel. That leaves the tens of thousands of Jihadists
in Hamas, Fatah and other Palestinian Authority TOT terror groups out of the
calculations. These groups are not just a threat to Israel. Hamas is an arm of
the Muslim Brotherhood and is backed by Iran. Its skills and resources are at
the disposal of allied terror groups.

That’s how Iran’s Hezbollah assisted Al Qaeda in its preparations
for 9/11. It’s why Iran is aiding the Taliban today. An Islamic terror group or
terrorist anywhere is a link in a global terror network.

That is the understanding that made ISIS so deadly, striking from
Iraq to Paris to New York.

Islamic terrorists are not a tiny minority of half a million. They
are not an aberration. They are everywhere. And the failed foreign
establishment funded and aided many of them.

Military interventions spread them, democratization brought them
to power and immigration transplanted them from war zones into our countries.
Their numbers have more than doubled in a decade. If the Left gets to set
foreign policy again, in another generation there will be millions.

If we want to avert that outcome, our interventions, regime change
and immigration policies must all objectively meet the test of making
societies, including our own, less Islamist, not more so. Foreign aid should be
barred by law from going to any country or militia whose goal is to establish
Islamic theocracy by force. Any intervention must be objectively shown to make
a society less bound to Islamic law. And immigration policy must be aimed at
reducing the percentage of Islamists in the United States.

Otherwise the next Islamic civil war won’t be fought in Syria, but
in the United States of America.

FROM COUNTERING ENEMY PROPAGANDA TO PROMOTING
IT

How
we produce enemy propaganda against ourselves.

The
West, particularly the left, not only believes the enemy’s big lie that “Islam
means peace”, but we propagate the lie ourselves. And we do this while blaming
ourselves for the Islamic enemy’s jihad on us. This corrupt state of ours began
with our pretending that inferior cultures aren’t inferior and superior
cultures aren’t superior. It began when we told nice lies about rotten cultures
and rotten lies about great cultures. It began with the double poison of
political correctness and multiculturalism, which spawned Islamic correctness.
This self-destructive rot in the West allows the enemy to remain undefeated 17
years after 9/11, and it allows many of us to utter “Islam means peace” no
matter what Islam preaches, no matter what Muslims do, no matter what horrors
we witness with our own eyes.

And
our refusal to challenge the enemy’s big lie, besides a number of disparate
individuals across the West, and a handful of organizations like The Freedom
Center and others, has corrupted the West on all levels, from art, to politics,
to news, to media, to academia, to think tanks. According to some reports,
Saudi Arabia is considering buying Legendary Entertainment, which produces
comic books and movies. And if that goes through, (other reports say Legendary
isn’t interested in selling to Saudi Arabia) it is guaranteed to produce more
Islam-friendly entertainment. But looking at how Islam-friendly 99% of our
entertainment is, why is the Saudi government bothering? They used to have to
buy people to kiss Islam’s ass, but now it’s done for free.

In
comic books, Muslim superheroes are being shoved down reader’s throats, without
demand, and without much interest even from Muslims. In TV, there’s always that
kind, wise Muslim teaching Westerners the errors of their ways. And this goes
for movies as well, where Muslims are only portrayed as victims or heroes.

Just
today, the illiberal New York Times celebrated Mohammad, the warlord founder of
Islam whose religion motivates the Islamic enemy’s war on the West. They
published a piece of enemy propaganda by a Muslim, Haroon Moghul, called “Happy Birthday, Muhammad.” This
is disgraceful. The civilized world’s newspapers shouldn’t be celebrating a
warlord whose war continues to murder innocents over a thousand years after his
death. A newspaper located in the same city of the worst attack against
non-Muslims ever perpetrated by Mohammad’s followers.

And
yet only a minority will find this to be intolerable, as most people have
become inured to it, thanks to Islam’s rabid propagandists, coupled with the
left’s rabid propagandists. I still get shocked at how much undeserved praise
Islam gets, and how much it gets away with murder. And I’m glad I still have
the capacity to get shocked, as I’ve never made peace with this intolerable
state of ours, and I never will. But the truth does break out from time to
time, even in unexpected places, and millions are exposed to it, in a
surprising way.

The
BBC TV series, Bodyguard, was such a big hit in
the UK, and now on Netflix, not only because it’s well done, with great
writing, acting and production quality, but because it tells the truth, in the
end. In the end, it shows us a truth that nearly no entertainment does today, regarding
the Islamic enemy and our willful blindness about it. That’s why the UK went
crazy over it. Westerners are dying to hear the truth. We’re sick and tired of
being lied to every single day about what we’re facing in the Islamic threat.

SPOILER:

The
show saved the best for last, as it revealed a truth about us and the Islamic
enemy. Seeing the hero of the story, who fought the Islamic enemy overseas as a
British soldier, and who should be wise to it, get fooled by a Muslim who
played victim in the premiere, only to reveal herself as a cold-blooded
jihadist in the finale, speaks to the West’s refusal to see the enemy for what
it is. This enemy is as brutal as it is deceitful. Everything is a weapon to
it, including words and emotions. And the Islamic enemy, through this show,
reveals itself in a way I don’t recall seeing in post-9/11 shows that deal with
terrorism. And yes, I’ve seen nearly all the ones that have been offered in TV
and movies, and I’ve enjoyed some, particularly 24, but these shows always push
the lie that jihadists are perverters of Islam, or that they’re noble in their
own way, or that they’re mere dupes to some evil politicians and businessmen,
etc., and we’re so used to those lies, that when the truth is told, it lifts a
good show to great heights.

END
SPOILER

So
while many in the West have allowed themselves to fall for the lies about
Islam, the truth still breaks out in unexpected ways. So of course the show has
been branded “Islamophobic” by Muslims and leftists. The show has a killer
ending, and yes, I’m Shocked that the BBC aired it. But I’m not shocked that it
was a major success with Millions of viewers.

And one last thing: Leftist Hollywood has had 17 years to show how
down they are for Islam, but even they haven’t pulled the trigger and had a
Muslim play the lead in one of their blockbuster action films. I know someone
will tell me, “Don’t give them any ideas”, or “You know that’s just around the
corner”, or even, “They Already Have!”, but the fact is, in 17 years, they
haven’t put their millions where their mouths are. Why? Because even they know
that they can’t get away with completely ignoring jihad as they have, and then
hit us with a hero who shares the same religion as the enemy at war with us.
They can’t get away with it. And they know it. So things are bad, but the truth
always gets out, no matter the lies that are concocted to stifle it. The Truth
Always Gets Out.

A radical muslim wants to cut your head off. A peaceful muslim
is praying that a radical muslim cuts your head off.

ISLAM: FROM THE DELUSIONAL TO THE
DANGEROUS

A 1,400-year-old primeval testimony of indoctrination and conquest.

It has been widely asserted by many
psychologists that human beings act upon their beliefs. Well, if this is true,
we can deduce that beliefs direct people in life, and while some beliefs are
harmless, some are the motivating force for good, others are delusional,
misguided, and even outright dangerous.

In my opinion, every version of the belief
called “Islam” ranges from the delusional to the dangerous.

Islam is a fantasy, birthed by Muhammad’s
delusion that he relayed to his first wife and employer, Khadija. Greatly frightened, he
told Khadija that he was visited by a jinn (devil) in the Hira cave. Khadija
comforted the distraught man by assuring him that the episode was Allah’s way
of choosing him as his messenger.

Muhammad believed his rich wife/employer,
who was 15 years his senior and the delusion became a belief: Islam. Remarkably
enough, under the early tutelage of Khadija, Muhammad succeeded in attracting
influential followers. Before long, the movement gathered more and more power
through violent campaigns, and the faith was taken to new people and foreign
lands.

This impressive delusion, Islam, presently
has in its stranglehold in over a billion humans, posing an existential threat
to all non-Muslims.

Islam is rooted in the primitive tribal
mentality of “Us against Them,” “We the righteous against the heathens,” “We
the servants submissive to the Great Allah against the rebellious enemies of
Allah.” Islam is a polarizer. Islam is an enemy-maker. To Islam, a non-Muslim
is a combatant against Allah, and he is fair game to be subjugated and killed.
When some billion and a half people adhere to the pathological belief of Islam
and use it as their marching orders for life, the rest of humanity can ignore
the threat only at its own peril.

After 1400 years, Islam is still on a
campaign of conquest throughout the known world. Hordes of life-in-hand
foot-soldier fanatical Muslims are striving to kill and get killed. All they
want is the opportunity to discharge their homicidal-suicidal impulse, on their
way to Allah’s promised glorious afterlife. And in the background, granting the
foot-soldiers’ wishes, are their handlers, the puppeteers, who pull the strings
and detonate these human bombs.

Those who cherish life must recognize these
emissaries of death, what makes them, what motivates them, and how best to
defend against them. The campaign of death waged by these Islamic jihadists, be
he a puppet or a puppeteer, is energized by the belief of delectable rewards
that await the faithful implementer of Allah’s dictates.

Through a highly effective indoctrination,
the jihadist has come to believe firmly in Islam’s absolute delusion. He
believes that Allah is the one and only supreme creator of the heavens and the
Earth; that it is his duty and privilege, to abide by Allah’s will and carry
out his plans at all costs. He believes firmly in a gloriously wonderful
immortal afterlife in paradise, for which a martyr’s death is the surest quickest
admission. Although the dominating theme of the delusion is quasi-spiritual,
the promised rewards of the afterlife awaiting the martyr are sensual and
material.

All the things and activities that the
jihadist desires and cannot attain or practice, and rejects in his earthly
life, will be purified and proffered to him in the paradise of the next life.
Thus goes the delusion.

As I have asserted in my previous articles,
it is important to understand that the human mind is not a perfect discerner of
objective reality. Reality is in the eye of the beholder. The outside world
only supplies bits and pieces of raw material that the mind puts together to
form its reality. Depending on the type and number of bits and pieces that a
given mind receives, its reality can be very different from that of another
mind. The more prescribed and homogeneous a group, the greater is the group’s
consensual reality, since the members share much in common, experiential input
and reinforce each other’s’ mindset.

Thus members of a given religious order,
for instance, tend to think much more similarly to one another than to members
of other groups with different experiential histories. Various approximations
of the objective reality, therefore, rule the mind. The degree to which these
approximations deviate from the larger group’s consensual reality determines
its delusional extent and severity.

A methamphetamine user’s reality
is often distorted in a different way. Under the influence of the drug, an
intense paranoia overtakes him. His reality is dominated by the belief that one
or more people are lurking about to harm or kill him. He may wield a deadly
weapon, going from room to room, from closet to closet, in search of the
assailants.

If you believe that a bug is camping deeply
inside your body, then you might go ahead and try to dig the non-existent bug
out. If you believe that people are lurking around the house to harm or kill
you, you go after them before they get to you. If you believe that all the
troubles of the world are due to the evil-doings of the non-Muslims who war
against Allah, then you do all you can to fight and kill them, particularly
since Allah tells you to do so in the Quran. The drug-induced delusions are
hallucinations.

They are dramatic and usually transitory, while
religiously-based implantation of ideas program the mind with lasting
delusions. Delusions, even when they are at great variance from the objective
reality, can rule the mind without the need for drugs, or because of
neurological dysfunctions or other factors. The young and the less-educated are
most vulnerable to believe the claims of charlatans, con artists, and cunning
clerics, as truth and reality.

The repeated intense indoctrination of the
children even changed the perception of some of the charlatan mullahs or the
imams, who believed their own lies and rushed to their own death clinging to
trinkets. Hence some of the puppeteers, in this instance, became puppets
themselves. Such are the folly and fallibility of the human mind.

It is, therefore, understandable that many
of the higher-up Islamic puppeteers, who are usually brainwashed from early
childhood, devote their fortunes and persons to the implementation of their
deeply ingrained delusions. Deluded by the threats and promises of Islam, Muslims,
rich or poor, vie with one another in furthering the violent cause of Allah.

Many non-Muslims are also victims of a
different, yet just as deadly, delusion. They believe that Islam is a religion
of peace, that only a small minority of Muslims are jihadists, and that Muslims
can be reasoned with to abandon the Quran-mandated elimination of
non-believers. These well-meaning simpletons are just as deluded as the fanatic
jihadists by refusing to acknowledge the fact that one cannot be a Muslim and
not abide by the dictates of the Quran.

THE (REALITY) OF THE GLOBALIST
DEMOCRAT PARTY AS IT SERVES THE RICH, “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS and MUSLIMS:

Anti-Semitic, open borders for
cheaper labor and funded by criminal banksters… and these pols are making vast
fortunes sucking the blood of America!

We must not let them cheat their
way to power over the rest of us. Their ongoing vote fraud must be
stopped and the Democrats need to take a look at themselves and at what they
have become. It's not a pretty picture. What they have become
threatens to destroy the greatest nation on the planet and they are doing it on
purpose. They have nothing but contempt for the US as founded and
for those of us who love this country. PATRICIA McCARTHY – AMERICAN THINKER

“Then we suffered the rattling election of
Barack Obama, whose active membership in a white-, Jewish-, and America-hating
church was well known to the electorate. His close personal
relationship with the likes of his adored Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Louis
Farrakhan was no secret. Obama was open about his
goals. He told us he was out to "fundamentally transform
America" and the world.” ALAN BERGSTEIN

“There is a deep racist and anti-Semitic disease in the leadership of
the Democrats. As Senator Cory Booker brings his hatred for the Jewish State to
the Senate, he should be asked whether he agrees with his hero, “The only good
Zionist is a dead Zionist we must take a lesson from Hitler”. DANIEL GREENFIELD

*

ISLAM: THE SCOURGE OF WESTERN CIVILAZATION

A radical Muslim
wants to cut your head off. A peaceful Muslim is praying that a radical Muslim
cuts your head off.

*

Why are we defended the borders of these
Muslim dictators when we can’t defend our own borders against NARCOMEX?

“The
Wahhabis finance thousands of madrassahs throughout the world where young boys
are brainwashed into becoming fanatical foot-soldiers for the petrodollar-flush
Saudis and other emirs of the Persian Gulf.” AMIL IMANI

Robert Spencer’s The History
of Jihad: From Muhammad to ISIS is an amazing book,
extraordinary in its detail and riveting in its narratives and analysis.
This book documents the history of horrors, violence, brutality, oppression,
conquests by the sword, beheadings of hundreds of thousands (probably
millions), destruction of civilizations and cultures, corruption, deception,
and lies that are part of the Islamist culture, and every other evil that you
can imagine that one group of humans could impose on others in the name of an
ideology or, in this case, a pseudo-religion.

ONCE A MUSLIM, ALWAYS A MURDERER!

Muslims
Stone to Death Christians in Barack Hussein Obama’s hometown of Kenya

Earlier this
month, jihadists of the Al-Shabaab terror group hijacked a bus
heading to Garissa and ordered all the passengers to exit the vehicle. The
assailants asked for identification cards, then proceeded to separate the
Muslims from the Christians.

When two
Christians refused to recite the Islamic statement of faith, or Shahada, they
were executed.

Twelve French Churches Attacked, Vandalized in One Week

A dozen Catholic churches have been desecrated across France over the period of one week in an egregious case of anti-Christian vandalism.

The recent spate of church profanations has puzzled both police and ecclesiastical leaders, who have mostly remained silent as the violations have spread up and down France.

Last Sunday, marauders set fire to the church of Saint-Sulpice — one of Paris’ largest and most important churches — shortly after the twelve-o’clock Mass.

Police have concluded that the fire was the result of arson and are now looking for possible suspects. The restoration of the church from the damage caused by the fire will reportedly cost several hundred million euros.

In Nimes (department of the Gard), near the border with Spain, the church of Notre-Dame des Enfants was desecrated in a particularly odious way, with vandals painting a cross with human excrement, looting the main altar and the tabernacle, and stealing the consecrated hosts, which were discovered later among piles of garbage.

Likewise, the church of Notre-Dame in Dijon, in the east of the country, suffered the sacking of the high altar and the hosts were also taken from the tabernacle, scattered on the ground, and trampled.

In Lavaur, in the southern department of the Tarn, the village church was assaulted by young men, who twisted one arm of a representation of the crucified Christ to make it appear that he was making an obscene gesture.

In the peripheries of Paris, in the department of Yvelines, several churches have suffered profanations of varying importance, in Maisons-Laffitte and in Houilles.

Although commentators have been reluctant to attach a particular religious or cultural origin to the profanations, they all share an evident anti-Christian character.

In recent months, anti-Semitic gangs have desecrated Jewish cemeteries, signing their actions with swastikas. In the case of the desecration of Catholic churches, the vandalism has spoken for itself: ridicule of the figure of Christ on the cross and desecration of major altars.

The Catholic hierarchy has kept silent about the episodes, limited themselves to highlighting that anti-Christian threat and expressing hope that politicians and police will get to the bottom of the crimes.

Reports indicate that 80 percent of the desecration of places of worship in France concerns Christian churches and in the year 2018 this meant the profanation of an average of two Christian churches per day in France, even though these actions rarely make the headlines.

In 2018, the Ministry of the Interior recorded 541 anti-Semitic acts, 100 anti-Muslim acts, and 1063 anti-Christian acts.