I have a list of questions to submit to any believer. It is specifically about Birkenau and its 4 crematories.As English is not my native tongue, that can be reformulated conveniently.Until now, I have not seen any answer to any point I refer on that list.Be free to add more questions or comment some.

<list Zulu v2-01>

- Why dis SS planed and started to built 4 no criminal "normal crematoriums" (Pressac p.264, 284, 368, etc. & Van Pelt) in 1942 whereas most of historians date the start of the "extermination plan" in the summer 1941? Why did not SS planed functional "death factories" from the scratch?

- Do you know Zentral Sauna (Pressac p 51, p. 65 etc.) ? Are the construction and location of such installation compatible with the stories of "gassings" at the 4 Kremas? How?

- Check the location of the 4 Kremas at Birkenau and their protection from the sights of the inmates.Were these location and protection properly designed to guarantee "secrecy" on their operation? How?

- A package of original drawings corresponding to the construction of Krema II and III was still on hands of the civilian firm Huta until 19thDecember 44 (list of originals plans returned to the Zentral Bauleitug, Pressac p.318) thus after the supposed end of the murder gassing. Noparticular policy of protection and confidentiality existed between that firm and the SS authorities of the camp concerning documents whichcirculated then freely out of the camp (Pressac p.315) Is that fact compatible with the absolute secret involving the SS criminal activitiesat that camp?

- Why did SS planed underground "gas chambers" at Krema II and III?Did you check cost vs advantages of such location in case of massivegassings?

- Do you think that a little elevator (1.35 x 2.15) was an appropriated system to move upstairs batches of 2000-3000 corpses? Is it compatible with the industrial expertize of Germans at that time?

- Check the use of Zyclon B to gas people at Krema II and III. If we believe the testimonies about the gassing operation, we observe that it must have been an absurd waste - about 7 to 40 more quantity of Zyclon than necessary - due to a deliberately uncontrolled temperature of evaporation. According with the room temperature, an appreciable proportion of HCN was remaining in the pellets of Zyklon after 15m minutes (>50% at 15ºC) although they were pulled out and supposedly thrown away by the SS.Do you think that such modus operandi was compatible with the chemical expertize of German and their official standard procedures to use Zyclon (see document NI-9912, Pressac p.18)? Why?

-Check the number of openings (about 100 holes of ventilation and drainage) existing in the rooms labeled Leichenkeller 1 (morgue 1 or "gas chamber") at Krema II and III. No testimony told that such openings were sealed before each murder gassing and then after unsealed to ventilate the rooms. Why did SS break systematically on those numerously repeated gassing operations mandatory standard procedures in vigor to carry out any fumigation performed with the same Zyclon B? (see document NI-9912, Pressac p.18).

- Check the ventilation system at Krema II and III especially the particular location of the exhaustion outlets. How could it work if weconsider the piles of cadavers on the floor after each murder gassing?.In case of "industrial gassings" at those places, why didn't SS fix that issue after the first gassing failure?

- At Krema II and III, Morgue 2 (Undressing room) had a volume of 900 m3 (columns's volume not discounted) and was ventilated by a 7,5 HP (5.59 kW) powered fan while Morgue 1 (Gas chamber) had a volume 504 m3 and was equipped with a 3.5 HP (2.61 kW) powered fan ([BW 30/34, p. 84 and BW 30/27 p. 61] Pressac p. 374).Do you consider that an allocation of 6,21 W per m3 to ventilate an undressing room and of 5,17 W per m3 for a gas chamber was a rationalindustrial choice?Is it technically justified to ventilate an undressing room with 20% more power than a gas chamber? Why?

- Check the arrangement of the 3 "gas chambers" at KIV and V. Try to imagine the flux of 2,500 victims and corpses through several 1 meterwidth doors. Do you you think that it was compatible with the industrial knowledge of German at that time if you allege they were "industriallygassing" thousands of people there? How and why?

At KIV and V we are told that the SS climbed on little ladders introduced the pellets of Zyklon B into the gas chambers by pouring themthrough little windows. We are told also that after 30 minutes maximum the Sonderkommandos penetrated into the rooms in order to proceed withthe transport of the bodies to the oven's room.What happened with the pellets of Zyklon B on the floor which contained at least 50% of HCN after 30 mn at 15ºC? Considering the poorventilation which consisted in opening the 6 little windows, must we believe that all the people working there were wearing gas masks,including SS and stokers at the oven's room?Have we some testimony which mentions that fact?

- Check the supposed 1 meter width of the "gas chamber" gas tight door (to 2000-3000 people). Is that width convenient to facilitate the allegedmovement of the thousands of victims and the removing of cadavers?

- Check the Pressac's story about 14 "false shower heads". Is credible the use of 14 "false"shower heads to deceive 2000-3000 people supposedlypacked into a room with a density of 9 to 14 per square meter?

- Supposing the first 1000 victims entered into the gas chamber equipped with 14 dummy showers - 1 shower per 71 people - don't you think thatthe people was able to realize soon enough that it was something wrong in it and entered in panic immediately?In such case, how were supposed to react the 1000 remaining people at the door outside?Then, how could it be possible for the SS to make enter through a 1 meter width door 1000 people in panic outside while 1000 were in panicinside?Please, show on a plan of the building, where were supposed to be placed the SS to control such situation.

- Which document do allow to assume that the 14 shower heads mentioned by Pressac were "false"? Which document indicates where they were mounted?

- What do you think about the plan to install 100 showers with hot water at Krema III mentioned on a correspondence to the firm Topf o 15thMay 1943 (Pressac p. 241), thus 3 months after the start of mass gassing at that place ?

- Where are the "4 holes of introduction" on the ceiling of KII? Do you think that 4 were necessary in case of "industrial gassings"? Why?

- Why no hole on the ceiling of the rooms labeled Leichenkeller 1 (gas chamber) appears on all plans of Crematorium II and III dated on 29thSeptember 1943 - thus 6 months after the beginning of the murder gassings - and whose originals, supposedly approved as conform with thebuilding actually constructed, were remitted by the civilian firm Huta on on 19th December 44 (Pressac p.318) ?

- Pressac gives a list on page 317 concerning the pack of drawings whose originals were remitted further by the civilian firm Huta to the ZentralBauleitung of Auschwitz on 19th December 44 (p.318). However Pressac doesn't explain why he doesn't show one of those plans of Krema II whilehe doesn't tell it is missing. The "missing drawing" reference is 22/10/42...109/6...015/IV...Bew. der Decke über dem Keller I / Reinforcement for the ceiling over Leichenkeller 1.Does that plan exist? Can you show it?

- If the SS used "Leichenkeller" (morgue) instead of "Gaskammer" (gas chamber) on the plans of the Kremas II and III, in an attempt of"camouflage", why didn't they hesitate in using that same word "Gaskammer" on the plans of the installation labeled BW5ENTLAUSUNGSANLAGE FOR KGL / delousing installation for prisoner of war camp? (Pressac p. 55, 56, 57 etc,,)

According with Pressac, documents which correspond to "criminal transformations" of the Krema II and III were emitted end of 1942.Can we consider then, that end 1942, the Leichenkeller 1 and 2 (gas chamber and undressing room according with exterminationists) didn'texist as functional Leichenkeller (morgues)?In that case, why did Bischoff wrote his letter to the SS General Kammler, on January 29, 1943 to explain that due to the delay of theconstruction of the Leichekeller, the corpses had to be stored in another place before their cremation. Isn't that letter a clear evidencethat Bischoff was actually needing morgues? Why so if they were inexistent?

Must we believe from that Bischoff's letter that, after solving the issue of the delay of construction and the Leichenkeller are finallycompleted, the corpses will be stored before their cremation at the rooms designed to that function?In that case, where would be the "gas chamber" and the "undressing room" at Krema II and III?

- Why, since 1946, no investigation was done on the floor of the ruins of the so called "gas chamber" at Krema II in order to check whether thetraces of the embedding of the alleged 4 "wire mesh columns of introduction" are visible there?

- What is the quantity of coke necessary to cremate 1 body in the model of Topf ovens installed at Birkenau?

- What is the total of coke necessary to burn all the alleged victims at Birkenau according with the official numbers?

- Where are the documentary traces of the amount of coke which should have burned all the alleged victims especially those among 437,000Hungarians in few months of 1944. Compare with official records.

- Why do you think that the cremation capacity of Auschwitz was extraordinary? Compared with what? With the cremation capacity at othercamps?What was the ratio [number of inmates] per muffle installed at other camps?Considering that same ratio, at which camp was installed the most "extraordinary" capacity of cremation?

- Supposing a plan to eliminate millions of people at Birkenau, Do you think that - from the scratch - the election of 4 cremationinstallations constituted by several intermittent ovens with multiple individual muffles unable to work continuously was an advantageousindustrial choice considering that SS had the possibility to built large industrial incinerators able to work continuously for burning manybodies at a time to that purpose?

- Which "criminal intention" can you detect on the plans of Kremas and attached documents?

- Which are the plans or technical documents which could imply that morgues (Leichenkeller) were not morgues at the Krema II and III?

- Where were supposed to be stored before their cremation those thousands of inmates registered on the official nazi death books atAuschwitz. To resume: as rooms usually located near the ovens at all nazi camp, where were located the morgues at Birkenau?

- Which known specific equipment could differentiate a concentration from an "extermination camp"?

1 - Why dis SS planed and started to built 4 no criminal "normal crematoriums" (Pressac p.264, 284, 368, etc. & Van Pelt) in 1942, whereas most of historians date the start of the "extermination plan" in the summer 1941 while Hoess confessed that Himmler transmitted the "extermination order" in May 1941 (Affidavit from April 5th, 1946)) ?Why did not Hoess ordered the construction and SS designed appropriated "4 industrial death factories" from the scratch in 1941?

2 - Do you know Zentral Sauna (Pressac p. 65 etc.) and its ways of access by prisoners from their barracks? Are the construction and location of such installation compatible with the stories of "gassings" at the 4 Kremas? How?

3 - Check the location of the 4 Kremas at Birkenau and their protection from the sights of the inmates.Were these location and protection properly designed to guarantee "a total secrecy" on their operation? How?

4 - A package of original drawings corresponding to the construction of Krema II and III was still on hands of the civilian firm Huta until 19th December 44 (list of originals plans returned to the Zentral Bauleitug, Pressac p.318) thus after the supposed end of the murder gassing. No particular policy of protection and confidentiality existed between that firm and the SS authorities concerning documents which circulated then freely out of the camp under civilian care (Pressac p.315) Is that fact compatible with the absolute secret involving the supposed SS criminal activities at that camp?

5 - Why did SS planed underground "gas chambers" at Krema II and III?Did you check cost vs advantages of such location in case of massivegassings?

6 - Do you think that a little elevator (1.35 x 2.15) was an appropriated system to move upstairs batches of 2000-3000 corpses? Is it compatible with the industrial expertize of Germans at that time?

7 - Check the use of Zyclon B to gas people at Krema II and III. If we believe the testimonies about the gassing operations, we observe that it must have been an absurd waste of a chemical product - about 7 to 40 more quantity of Zyclon than necessary - due to a deliberately uncontrolled temperature of its evaporation. Furthermore, accordingly with the room temperature, an appreciable proportion of HCN was remaining into the pellets of Zyklon after 15m minutes (>50% at 15ºC) although we are told that they were pulled out of the room and supposedly thrown away by the SS.(see the curves [HCN evaporation vs Temperature] http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/Image19.gif)Do you think that such modus operandi was compatible with the chemical expertize of German and their official standard procedures to use Zyclon during fumigations performed routinely (see document NI-9912, Pressac p.18) ? Why?

8 -Check the number of openings existing in the rooms labeled Leichenkeller 1 (morgue 1 or "gas chamber") at Krema II and III (about 100 holes of ventilation and drainage). No testimony told that such openings were sealed before each murder gassing and then after unsealed to allow the ventilation of the rooms. Why did SS break systematically by neglecting to seal all those openings, during all those numerously repeated gassing operations, mandatory standard procedures in vigor to carry out any fumigation performed with the same Zyclon B? (see document NI-9912, Pressac p.18).

9 - Are we sure that by maintaining such number of unsealed openings in the rooms supposedly used as "gas chambers" at KII and III, this didn't imply any risk for the workers and SS who stayed in the buildings during the alleged "gassing operations"?

10- At Krema II and III, Morgue 2 (Undressing room) had a volume of 879,6 m3 (volume of 11 columns + ventilation conducts not discounted) and was ventilated by a 7,5 HP (5.23 kW) powered fan while Morgue 1 (Gas chamber) had a volume 569 m3 (volume of 7 columns + ventilation conducts not discounted) and was equipped with a 3.5 HP (2.61 kW) powered fan ([BW 30/34, p. 84 and BW 30/27 p. 61] Pressac p.360, p.374).Do you consider that an allocation of 4.92 W per m3 to ventilate an undressing room and of 4.59 W per m3 for a gas chamber was a rational industrial choice?Being more specific, is it technically justified to ventilate an undressing room with 7% more power than a gas chamber?

11 - Taking into account the not particularly powerful ventilation system installed at Krema II and III and especially the peculiar location of the series of its little exhaustion outlets near the floor, how could such system ventilate properly the murder room after each gassing operation if we consider the piles of cadavers accumulated on the floor accordingly with the accounts reported by "eyewitnesses"?.In case of "industrial gassings" at those places, did SS fix that considerable ventilation issue after the unavoidable first gassing failure? Have we documentary or physical traces of specific modifications made by them to remedy that major flaw of functionality of their murder weapon?

12 - For performing gassing operations at KIV and V we are told that the SS climbed on little ladders to introduce the pellets of Zyklon B into the gas chambers by pouring them through 6 little windows, one by one successively. Such processing was qualified as a "circus act" by Pressac (Pressac p. 386). Can we admit that the industrial knowledge of Germans at that time was unable to solve that ludicrous flaw for performing more rationally multiple industrial gassings at these places?

13- At KIV and V, we are told also that after 30 minutes maximum of gassing the Sonderkommandos penetrated into the rooms in order to proceed with the transport of the bodies to the oven's room.What happened with the pellets of Zyklon B on the floor which contained at least 50% of HCN after 30 mn at 15ºC? Considering the poor ventilation which consisted in opening the 6 little windows and in waiting for the good will of the wind, must we believe that all the people working there were wearing gas masks, including SS and stokers at the oven's room?Have we some testimony which mentions that fact and the drastic safety measures which must have been taken accordingly for all the industrial gassings performed at theses places?

14 - Check the location of the 3 supposed "gas chambers" at KIV and V. Try to imagine the flux of 2,500 victims and their corpses through several successive 1 meter width doors from the "undressing stage" up to the cremation of bodies.Do you you think that such physical arrangement was compatible with the industrial knowledge of German at that time if you assume that SS were "industrially gassing" thousands of people there?

15 - Question from David Cole (44) At Auschwitz Birkenau, the rooms in Kremas 4 and 5 that are supposed to have been used as homicidal gas chambers all had drains in the floor that led right into the camp sewage system. These floor drains can still be seen today. Since, in these "gas chambers," it is said that the Zyklon pellets were dumped in loose, what stopped the pellets from going down the drain or being kicked or brushed down by the victims? Pressac was aware of this problem. He has tried to prove that the Zyklon pellets would present no problem. He has tried to prove that the Zyklon pellets would present no danger in the camp sewer, since the water would (in his opinion; this is a debatable point) "neutralize" the poison so it wouldn't present a danger when going through Birkenau's large sewage treatment plants. But Pressac misses the point; the question of just how harmful the Zyklon would be in the sewer is SECONDARY to the point that if the Zyklon is IN the sewer that means it's NOT in the gas chamber doing the job the Nazis intended! If the victims can dump the Zyklon into the sewer, that means they themselves won't be gassed. How could these rooms have functioned as homicidal gas chambers?David Colehttp://www.vho.org/GB/c/DC/gc46-ORIGI.html

16 - Check the supposed 1 meter width gas tight doors which equipped all the "gas chamber" where 2000-3000 people were supposedly gassed. Is that width of 1 meter (3,28 ft.) convenient to facilitate the alleged movement of the thousands of victims and the removing of their cadavers?

17 - Check the Pressac's story about 14 "false shower heads". Is credible the use of 14 "false"shower heads to deceive 2000-3000 people supposedly packed into a room with a density of 9 to 14 per square meter?

18 - Let imagine a "gassing operation" by supposing that the first 1000 victims entered into the gas chamber equipped with 14 dummy showers - 1 shower per 71 people - don't you think that the people was able to realize soon enough that it was something wrong in it and then entered in panic immediately?In such case, how were supposed to react the 1000 remaining people at the door outside packed into the little vestibule and the remaining into the "undressing room"?Then, how could it be possible for the SS to make enter through a 1 meter width door 1000 people in panic outside the "gas chamber" while 1000 were in panic inside?Please, show on a plan of the building, where were supposed to be placed the SS to control such situation.Have we some testimony which stresses that particular point of the gassing operations?- Which document do allow us to assume that the 14 shower heads mentioned by Pressac were "false"? Which document indicates where they were mounted?

19 - What do you think about the plan to install 100 showers with hot water at Krema III mentioned on a correspondence to the firm Topf on 15th May 1943 (Pressac p. 241), thus 3 months after the start of mass gassing at that place ?What would have been the purpose of installing 100 showers with water warmed by recycling the incinerators' heat into a building which was supposedly working as a "death factory"?Where was the local planed to install those 100 showers?

20 - Where are the "4 holes of introduction" on the ruins of the ceiling of Krema II allegedly used to introduce the Zylon's pellets into the "gas chamber" ?Van Pelt himself acknowledged that no holes consistent with the eyewitnesses accounts were visible on the ruins of Krema II although he advanced that they could have been obturated before the destruction of the building. Can you possible that no traces of those obturations could be visible nowadays on the ruins of the ceiling of 20 cm thick concrete?Do you think that 4 holes of introduction of Zyklon were necessary in case of "industrial gassings"? Why?

21 - Considering the rudimentary system of "push-pull" of a basket by mean of a rope through 4 holes allegedly used by SS at Krema II and III to perform "industrial massive gassings", can we regard it as compatible with the German industrial knowledge of that time?Can't we find a bit strange that, in order to perform industrially those numerously repeated operations, the SS didn't use a modern equipment, already installed at Dachau in that time, that is a Degesch machine especially designed to introduce Zyklon into a room through one hole only, able to open automatically the cans while producing hot air to facilitate the complete evaporation of the HCN contained into the pellets?http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScr ... ion02.html

22 - Jan-Robert Pelt admits that no holes consistent with the gassings' recites "can be observed" on the collapsed roof of Krema II (Jan-Robert Pelt report 1999, p 295, Trial Irving vs Lipstadt). However, he advances further that they could have been possibly masked by pouring some concrete in them, and thus restore the slab.In such case, don't you think it would be still possible to detect the traces of such "restoration" nowadays?In addition, why would the holes be "restored" if the SS planed to blow up the building?

23 - Why no hole on the ceiling of the rooms labeled Leichenkeller 1 (gas chamber) appears on all available plans of Crematorium II and III dated on 29th September 1943 - thus 6 months after the beginning of the murder gassings - and whose originals, supposedly approved as conform with the building actually constructed, were remitted by the civilian firm Huta on on 19th December 44 (Pressac p.318) ?Do we assume that Huta was working with plans which didn't correspond actually with the building they were constructing and for which they were responsible?

24 - Pressac gives a list on page 317 concerning the pack of drawings whose originals were remitted further by the civilian firm Huta to the Zentral Bauleitung of Auschwitz on 19th December 44 (p.318). However Pressac doesn't explain why he doesn't show one of those plans of Krema II while he doesn't tell it is missing. The "missing drawing" reference is 22/10/42...109/6...015/IV...Bew. der Decke über dem Keller I / Reinforcement for the ceiling over Leichenkeller 1.Does that plan exist? Can you show it?

25 - Has an investigation been done, since 1946, on the floor of the ruins of the so called "gas chamber" at Krema II in order to check whether the traces of the embedding of the alleged 4 "wire mesh columns of introduction" are visible there? If such investigation was actually done, why weren't its results never published?According with Pressac, Excavations were carried out on 14th August 1968 by a group of Germans from the “Sühnezeichen” organization in the northern part of the ruins of the Krematorium III gas chamber. Where is the report of such work?

26 - If, as we are told, the SS used "Leichenkeller" (morgue) instead of "Gaskammer" (gas chamber) on the plans of the Kremas II and III, in an attempt of "camouflage", why didn't they hesitate in using that same word "Gaskammer" on the plans of the installation labeled BW5 ENTLAUSUNGSANLAGE FOR KGL / delousing installation for prisoner of war camp? (Pressac p. 55, 56, 57 etc,,)

27 - Considering that the plans of the crematories were drawn by inmates and openly handed by the civilian firms involved in their construction, could you explain how such operation of "camouflage" could have been carried out?Do some documentary traces of a necessary list of "equivalences" exist for the words that should have been "substituted"? Something like "Dont use "Gaskammer" put instead "Leichenkeller"?Do you think that such system was realistic given the actual conditions of work during the construction?

28 - According with Pressac, documents which correspond to "criminal transformations" of the Krema II and III were emitted end of 1942.Can we consider then, that end 1942, the Leichenkeller 1 and 2 (gas chamber and undressing room according with exterminationists) didn't exist as functional Leichenkeller (morgues)?In that case, why did Bischoff wrote his letter to the SS General Kammler, on January 29, 1943 to explain that due to the delay of the construction of the Leichekeller, the corpses had to be stored in another place before their cremation. Isn't that letter a clear evidence that Bischoff was actually needing morgues?Why so if they were supposed inexistent?

29- Must we believe from that Bischoff's letter that, after solving the issue of the delay of construction and the Leichenkeller are finally completed, the corpses will be stored before their cremation at the rooms designed to that function?In that case, where would be the "gas chamber" and the "undressing room" at Krema II and III?

30 - What is the quantity of coke necessary to cremate 1 body in the model of Topf ovens installed at Birkenau?

31 - What is the total of coke necessary to burn all the alleged victims at Birkenau according with the official numbers?

32 - Where are the documentary traces of the amount of coke which should have burned all the alleged victims especially those among 437,000 Hungarians in few months of 1944. Compare with the official records which were found in Russian archives.

33 - Why do you think that the cremation capacity of Auschwitz was extraordinary? Compared with what? With the cremation capacity at other camps?What was the ratio [number of inmates] per muffle installed at other camps?Considering that same ratio, at which camp was installed the most "extraordinary" capacity of cremation?Is it a camp labeled as "death camp" in the orthodox historiography? Why not, if its cremation capacity is superior to the Auschwitz's one?

34 - Supposing a plan to eliminate millions of people at Birkenau, Do you think that - from the scratch - the election of 4 cremation installations constituted by several intermittent ovens with multiple individual muffles unable to work continuously was an advantageous industrial choice considering that SS had the possibility to built large industrial incinerators able to work continuously for burning many bodies at a time to that purpose?

35 - Which "criminal intention" can you detect on the plans of Kremas and attached documents?

36 - Which are the plans or technical documents which could imply that morgues (Leichenkeller) were not morgues at the Krema II and III?

37 - Where were supposed to be stored before their cremation those thousands of inmates registered on the official nazi death books at Auschwitz. To resume: where were the morgues usually located near the ovens at Birkenau?

38 - Which known specific equipment could differentiate a concentration camp from an "extermination camp"?

Zulu wrote:I have a list of questions to submit to any believer. It is specifically about Birkenau and its 4 crematories.As English is not my native tongue, that can be reformulated conveniently.Until now, I have not seen any answer to any point I refer on that list.Be free to add more questions or comment some.

Zulu,

I would be happy to submit my answers to your questions - most are not particular difficult with some basic knowledge on Auschwitz by the way - but I can not see how this can be done under the present moderation policy here. My step by step treatment of denierbud's "Auschwitz The comedy" was simply deleted with the explanation "your litany of topics...need to be addressed in separate threads per specific complaint." (for those who are interested, I reposted most of it in the comment section of the video). It is of course strange that it is supposed to be okay to post a video making several allegations, but then commenting on those allegations is not allowed in the same thread.

So how should we do here? Am I allowed to submit my answers in this thread (and if yes, why couldn't I submit my reply on the Auschwitz comedy video?). Or do I have to open 38 threads and then is it guaranteed that I do not get banned for "spamming"?

I would be happy to submit my answers to your questions - most are not particular difficult with some basic knowledge on Auschwitz by the way - but I can not see how this can be done under the present moderation policy here. My step by step treatment of denierbud's "Auschwitz The comedy" was simply deleted with the explanation "your litany of topics...need to be addressed in separate threads per specific complaint." (for those who are interested, I reposted most of it in the comment section of the video). It is of course strange that it is supposed to be okay to post a video making several allegations, but then commenting on those allegations is not allowed in the same thread.

So how should we do here? Am I allowed to submit my answers in this thread (and if yes, why couldn't I submit my reply on the Auschwitz comedy video?). Or do I have to open 38 threads and then is it guaranteed that I do not get banned for "spamming"?

Hans, this is what I said to you concerning that thread:

Hans,Your litany of topics which you believe to be incorrect about this video need to be addressed in separate threads per specific complaint. You're not new here and know the guidelines. I have saved your post if you want it back. BTW, there are existing threads on each of you complaints.Mod1

I stand by that and will apply it to his thread as well.Zulu:It would be very difficult to addresses all these points in a single thread and have it remain cogent, readable. You've raised a lot of interesting points, but please work through them one thread at a time. I suggest that grouping them per thread would be a solution. Many points are directly related and could be grouped per thread, examples: 1.The lack of Zyklon-B insertion 'holes' and the points made about that could be grouped. 2. the alleged 'fake showerheads' points could be grouped 3. the crematorium capacity has many points which could be grouped, on & on. There is no need for individual threads for points which are directly related.

Hans, you could approach the video in the same way.How does that work everyone?Mod1