Kuragari

Does the editor get stoned and then pick the shirts based on what looks good to eat? Enough with the food shirts! We need GOOD shirts again. Stop accepting designs that are basically crap instructions.

MathUhhhSaurus

Actually, no butter is used to make peanut butter. The peanuts are finely blended until they are the smooth thing we know as peanut butter. This can be done with a lot of nuts (one example is a macadamia nut butter which is used to make the delicious white chocolate macadamia nut cookies :D )

karyn2002

Haha, Mine too! I told my best friend the same thing when we were 6. Funnily enough, her hair started to gain a slight curl/wave when she started eating the crusts, and she believed I had magical powers, haha (though if I did, I would have used them to make my own stick straight hair curl when I ate crusts, haha).

pedro123

Thank you, thank you, thank you! I was hoping this would make the Redux round last weekend - and I wanted it this summer when it was first up. Got a couple for gifts and one for my own badself! Love this one ;-)

BrotherTungsten

In the latter an infinite amount of t( time or toast) would make up for in infinity small amount of peanut-butter or jelly. Which just is just silly.

I have to assume when the artist claims x=pb+j. He is referring to some nonlinear complex representation of the spreadable in question. Specifically some sort of surface integral.

It's weird that the post in question is integrating with respect to b, though, seeing as how the implication seems to be that the two component integrals have t as the independent variable.

Unless b is the amount of baseball bats. In which case, assuming for the moment that pb, j and t are constants, you'd have Win = ((pb+j)(t))b + c.

This of course implies that an increase in baseball bats results in a net increase in win regardless of the amount of peanut butter time and jelly time, assuming that one or neither of them are equal to zero.

This is a subjective statement, which is why the integral symbol looks like an "s."

Also, the unknown constant "c" is undoubtedly the amount of crust, as a positive amount increases Win while a negative amount (overcutting and removing some of the pb&j) results in a decrease in Win.

juansinanos

BrotherTungsten wrote:It's weird that the post in question is integrating with respect to b, though, seeing as how the implication seems to be that the two component integrals have t as the independent variable.

Unless b is the amount of baseball bats. In which case, assuming for the moment that pb, j and t are constants, you'd have Win = ((pb+j)(t))b + c.

This of course implies that an increase in baseball bats results in a net increase in win regardless of the amount of peanut butter time and jelly time, assuming that one or neither of them are equal to zero.

This is a subjective statement, which is why the integral symbol looks like an "s."

Also, the unknown constant "c" is undoubtedly the amount of crust, as a positive amount increases Win while a negative amount (overcutting and removing some of the pb&j) results in a decrease in Win.

t for time spent spreading and hence more peanut butter or jelly the larger the t value. db was supposed to be over the entire surface of bread.

Woot.com is operated by Woot Services LLC.
Products on Woot.com are sold by Woot, Inc., other than items on Wine.Woot which are sold by the seller specified on the product detail page.
Product narratives are for entertainment purposes and frequently employ
literary point of view;
the narratives do not express Woot's editorial opinion.
Aside from literary abuse, your use of this site also subjects you to Woot's
terms of use
and
privacy policy.
Woot may designate a user comment as a Quality Post, but that doesn't mean we agree with or guarantee anything said or linked to in that post.