Monday, December 7, 2009

The European Union, arguably the most important political achievement of our lifetime, is unarguably among the most underestimated, especially when its foreign ministers come together to debate common approaches to global problems--and doubly so when the problem at hand is the Middle East. Perhaps we all just take it for granted that Brussels cannot leverage Middle Eastern leaders the way Washington can, or that European leaders will anyway be followers, or that Germany, for obvious historic reasons, will foil any effort to exert pressure on Israel, whose diplomacy is often couched in the rhetoric of Jewish survival. But something is changing, and we ought to take notice.

Today, European foreign ministers are meeting in Brussels to consider a Swedish draft document, recognizing, among other things, East Jerusalem as the future capital of a Palestinian state and promising to recognize such a state in advance, based on the 1967 borders, unless changes are agreed to by both sides. The document adopts, in effect, the lines of the Clinton parameters, and seeks to advance an international consensus regarding the outline of a final deal.

Enough is enough, the document seems to be saying: a new round of negotiation would be fine, but old rounds have produced plenty to work with. The deal is not so mysterious; the problem, now that the Fayyad government has reasonably stabilized Palestine's security and economy, is to force Israelis to face down its ersatz Judeans while they still can; to get Israelis used to the idea that Jerusalem is not just an Israeli city, Palestine is not just Israel's internal problem, and that down the road is diplomatic isolation and possibly economic sanctions. When you consider that more than a third of Israel's exports (and a higher proportion of high technology exports) go to Europe, the idea that the EU has no leverage here is increasingly preposterous.

In any case, it is clear from past negotiations that Israel and Palestine cannot make peace alone. One can only hope the EU document is essentially adopted, or even that a close vote prompts the requisite attention in Jerusalem. Adopting the resolution might even be a trial balloon for the Obama administration to do what it should have done from the start, which is adopt the Clinton parameters as policy itself.

FOR WHILE THE Wall Street Journal publishes fatuous pieces about shopping in Nablus, the situation on the ground is deteriorating day by day. Anyone with a head and heart can sense a terrible violence coming.

Here, following, is another report from David Shulman, a frequent contributor to this blog, about the explosive situation in Sheikh Jarrah.

December 4, 2009: Sheikh Jarrah, East Jerusalem

Exhibit A. Kindly examine the attached photograph (above). Let's make an inventory. Three stuffed animals, two face up, one face down. The yellow-and-red one, half animal half cushion, has an inscription: "I love you." One school bag. Two unidentified red toys. Five pieces of yellow lego. One armless, legless doll. One yellow brush with blue bristles. An Arabic newspaper. A broken pole wrapped in red cloth. A broken flower, perhaps freshly cut, probably thrown out with the vase it sat in.

I don't want to overload your inbox, so I won't add more pictures of this patch of ground in front of the al-Kurd family's house in Sheikh Jarrah. I can tell you what's there. A kitchen stove, its glass top shattered, green splinters everywhere. Broken microwave lying on its face. Pieces of bicycle and a children's tractor. Shoes, mostly children's. Many more pieces of lego. A few pots and pans. Some sheets. Boxes of odds and ends—cellphone, cords, electric wire. Plastic shovel for playing in the sand.

Exhibit B. See attached photograph. Border Policemen outside the door of the house, now inhabited by Israeli settlers. The police are there, needless to say, to protect them. Note the Israeli flags strung over the windows, just to rub it in. The people taking photographs and milling around are Israeli peace activists who came for today's protest march: ordinary people, shocked by what is happening in Sheikh Jarrah and angry enough to spend this Friday afternoon on the long walk through downtown Jerusalem, then along Road Number One which divides east from west—the future border between the Israeli and the Palestinian cities-- past the American Colony Hotel and the neighborhood mosque to this street where, as of Sunday, a third Palestinian family has been violently expelled from its home.We're riding a wave of such expulsions. Last Friday we were here, Eileen and I, in this very courtyard, before the court ruling; we spoke at some length with the eloquent, moderate father of the al-Kurd family, who told us the story in gentle Arabic. He had told it many times that day:

"We were refugees from Haifa in 1948. Everyone in this neighborhood is a refugee, some from Lydda and Ramla, some from Jaffa. After the 1948 war, the Jordanian government gave us these plots of land to build on, in exchange for our UNRWA cards. The cards were worth a lot of money, but we wanted to live normal lives in our own houses, so we gave up our status as refugees. We have lived in this home since the 1950's. The Israeli settlers claim the land belongs to the Jews and they went to court, for years we were in the courts. But this is my house, it is our home, I built the annex in the front and planted the fruit trees. Now the court has ordered the annex to be sealed off and they forced us out. Settlers came with the soldiers in the night and started throwing our possessions outside, just like that, and they hit us, one of them grabbed my daughter by the throat and tried to strangle her. They are very violent. We cannot live with them. They hurt us and they insult us and they are thieves and the soldiers help them. The court has left us, for now, with the back part of the house; the front is locked and sealed. On Sunday the court will decide finally. I don't believe they will force us to leave. I don't believe they can be so unjust. Come meet my mother, she will tell you."

We peeked through the window: his mother was sleeping, the afternoon receding into night. We sat with him for a few moments in the tent he has put up in the courtyard across from what used to be his front door. His wife, a handsome, modern woman, rushed into the back of the house and emerged with a box of baklava to offer us; it was 'Id al-Adha, the Feast of Sacrifice, when guests are especially welcome.

Then on Sunday the court ruled in favor of the settlers, and they moved in immediately with the soldiers to back them up, as is normal in East Jerusalem these days. That's how the lego and the stuffed animals landed up in the courtyard.

This is the third recent eviction in Sheikh Jarrah—after the al-Hanun and al-Ghawi families lost their homes to settlers-- and six more families have already received court orders preparing them for this same fate. We've tried our best to stop it, we've run an international campaign, we've kept volunteers in the houses and protestors outside, we've done what we could in the courts and the press, and we've failed and will no doubt fail again unless some of you who read this report find a way to bring effective pressure to bear. Let me say at once: the legal situation in Sheikh Jarrah is complicated, but it's also largely irrelevant. The settlers, through what is called the Sephardic Community Committee, have produced documents to support their claim that these plots of land belonged to Jews during the Ottoman period, over a century ago. Ergo, they must be restored to Jewish hands (like all the rest of Palestine?

And what about the hundreds of Palestinian houses in West Jerusalem now inhabited by Jews? No Israeli court is about to return them to their original owners.). All the Palestinian families who live here received the land from the Jordanian government, as Mr. al-Kurd said. They are large families; two generations have been born and grown up in these houses. The whole question has been in the courts for decades, and the rulings have sometimes favored the Palestinians, at other times the settlers. I'm not about to make any judgment relating to the legal niceties.

But make no mistake: these expulsions are first and foremost political acts. They are part of a sustained, constantly ramifying campaign to plant colonies of fanatical Jewish settlers in the heart of Palestinian neighborhoods all over East Jerusalem, at the same time driving out whatever Palestinian families happen to be in the way. The courts merely provide the fig leaf (and the municipality and the government provide the soldiers). If you have any doubt, you have only to look at the settlers who have moved in; you can watch them any evening, gloating from the rooftops at their victims, some of whom now live in ramshackle tents they have put up on the street across from their homes. The police have cruelly demolished even the al-Ghawi tent at least five times. I've sat there with the family on cold winter nights, and I think I won't try to describe how it feels. The settlers also have a habit of viciously attacking the Palestinians whom they've displaced; sometimes fist-fights develop, as happened earlier this week, with the unsurprising result that the Palestinians—in this case two young men from the al-Kurd family and a third from another family—were arrested and sent to jail. Not only have they been evicted from their home; they also get to spend time in prison, for good measure. When the Channel 2 news reported on events in Sheikh Jarrah on Wednesday night this week, the mainstream announcer offered his Israeli audience a one-line moral to the story: "Palestinians in East Jerusalem don't obey the orders of the court."

Would you?

Marching through the city this afternoon was a lot like old times—say the days of the first Lebanon War in 1982, when to join a peace demonstration was like running a gauntlet of hostile, jeering crowds, who would often punch you or spit at you as you passed. Today we were sixty or seventy, maybe a bit more, hardly a vast horde. One happier thought: a good half of the group was made up of young people (early 20's), committed, lucid, fearless, full of life and energy. They are the future of the peace movement here, if it has a future. I saw four or five of my honors students, and also two children, now fully grown, of veteran activists I have known. People emerged from their shops on the Ben-Yehudah pedestrian mall to curse us, and someone on a high balcony over the street tried to blast us with water from a hose, and there were some who tried to hit us as we moved through town, beating our drums, crying out old, rather useless, weather-beaten words like "Thou shalt not steal" and "Thou shalt not murder" and "You can't build a democracy on murder and theft" and then, in Arabic as we moved east, "No to the Occupation," and so on.

As we passed the hospice near Notre Dame, the male nurses in their white caps—all Palestinian—came out onto the roof to watch us, and when they read the Arabic signs we were carrying they suddenly broke into smiles and raised their thumbs to cheer us, so maybe it was worthwhile just for that. A little farther along, deep in East Jerusalem, religious Jews poked their heads out of the windows of the huge hotel they inhabit to yell "Death to Arabs!" So it goes in the Holy City. We filled the courtyard of the al-Kurd house and spilled over into the street outside it; I can't help wondering if the settlers inside the house felt at least a little uneasy listening to our cries urging them to get out, to return the theft; or if a tiny seed of doubt took root in the mind of, say, just one policeman."

9 comments:

Y. Ben-David
said...

Funny, Bernie is worried that "terrible violence is coming" because of the supposed "lack of progress in the peace process". Yet, "terrible violence" came AT THE HEIGHT OF THE PEACE PROCESS. Right after Arafat was brought into the Palestinian territories, massive genocidal Judeophobic propaganda was being dissemenated in the official state-controlled Palestinian media and waves of suicide bombings occurred. Right after Rabin's murder, Peres did a quick withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Palestinian cities and this was immediately followed by another wave of suicide bombings which led to Peres losing the 1996 elections to Netanyahu. From 1996-1999 Netanyahu slowed down the Oslo process and there was a DECREASE in terrorism. Barak came in to power in 1999 determined to push an agreement on Arafat, offering almost all of the territories the Palestinians demanded and yet there was a massive explosion in terrorism. So we see it is NOT "lack of progress in the peace process" that causes violence IT IS THE PEACE PROCESS ITSELF THAT ENCOURAGES VIOLENCE. The more Israel is willing to give, the more the terrorists and their backers in both HAMAS and the Palestinian Authority figure that more attacks will bring more concessions.

I wish Bernie would also address how the Palestinians and their Arabs allies can be forced to accept Bernie's dreamed-of "imposed solution". What if they say NO? What can Obama or the UN or the EU do to them to force them to accept it? Cut off aid? No way-that will only bring HAMAS to power. HAMAS opposes any such path to creating a Palestinian state and they have said so.So Bernie is fantasizing, as usual.

I should add that this tear-jerking account of Jews moving into Jewish owned-property is merely another attempt by "progressives" like Bernie to transfer the guilt off themselves and onto the "settlers", because Bernie himself is a "settler", having made aliyah to Israel without permission from the Palestinians (the original PLO convenant said that all Jews who arrive in Palestine after 1917 would have to go back where they came from), and, while I don't know where he lives, his "progressive" friends live in Baka and the German Colony neighborhoods of Jerusalem which were Arab neighborhoods before Israel's War of Independence in 1948 and the Arabs either fled or were driven out as a result of military operations (the Arabs started the War so I have no problem with it) so Bernie's friends if not himself are personally benefitting from living on what the Arabs consider "stolen" Arab land, whereas Sheikh Jarrah was Jewish before 1948. Bernie is hoping the Arabs will look the other way if he rants on and on about the Terrible Settlers and will forget what his "progressive" friends have done. Transference of Guilt, plain and simple.

And what about the hundreds of Palestinian houses in West Jerusalem now inhabited by Jews?

I like to feel that I would have been in Shulman's group.

A friend from my childhood and apparently just sent me a Hanukkah wish with a link to what is apparently circulating in emails here, produced by Nefesh B'Nefesh in the streets of Jerusalem. Come join us, life is good here, make Aliyah. ( the words: "They say we are the chosen people" "we are exceptional")

Reading Shulman and looking at the video how can one not feel the disconnect?

Y. Ben-David: One could also draw the conclusions that it was not the peace process itself but the failures, the insincerity, the half-measures believed to be left as inadequate final measures that caused the violence. One could also draw the conclusion that it was the violence itself, that lead to further withdrawals and negotiations that lead to progress in arriving at the evolution of parameters of a more just final settlement. There has been an advance which you never acknowledge as you drag up selected parts of history. One could easily come to the conclusion that it has been the OCCUPATION itself,the conditions under which people have been forced to live that has caused the violence. And one could easily come to the conclusion that more extreme violence and international sanction upon Israel is inevitable and maybe necessary.

B-D.-It's the 1967 lines that divide now- the green line is overwhelmingly and increasingly accepted by the rational all around. Though '48 still gnaws, it disqualifies your argument to keep saying that the rejection of Israel within the '48 lines prevents going forward. Even Meshaal has said he will accept Israel within the ‘67 lines ( see Haaretz article January 2009).

If it makes you feel any better, Bernie, the police knocked down Noam Federman's house near Kiryat Arba/Hevron some months ago, also claiming it was illegal. What is ironic is that the police threw all their belongs out of the house and they were spread all over the ground and there were pictures of toys there, just like the tear-jerking picture you posted above. So I guess the police are willing to throw anybody out of their house without regard to race, religion or national origin.

Do not think twice, opt for a Replica Luxury Watches and he will not just treasure it, he will pass it down the generations with utmost care and love. You can count on Rolex watches to be the perfect gift on any occasion for any man of substance, style and status.

Praise for The Hebrew Republic

"Inspired and highly informative: a stunningly fresh narrative of a century old conflict."

Amos Elon, Author of The Pity of it All, Herzl, and The Israelis

“Avishai’s book is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand not only the genuine complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but also the real prospects for a sane and peaceful outcome."

Dov Frohman, Founding CEO, Intel-Israel

"During the past two decades, Professor Bernard Avishai has emerged as one of the most eloquent and penetrating analysts of the Israeli scene: of its politics, international relations, religious confrontations, and social fabric; of its national triumphs and failures; of its collective hopes and looming perils. This volume can only add to Avishai's reputation. The Hebrew Republic is indispensable reading even for veteran students of the Jewish State."

Prof. Howard M. Sachar, author of A History of Israel

"If justice and reason still count for anything, "The Hebrew Republic" will profoundly change the Middle East conversation, both here and in Israel. If the notions of a Jewish state and a democratic society sit uneasily together -- if they are, in some sense, thesis and antithesis -- then Bernard Avishai has brilliantly deliniated the indispensable synthesis. This is an exciting and supremely important book."

Hendrik Hertzberg, Senior Editor and Staff Writer, The New Yorker

“Anyone who cares about Israel, the Palestinians, or peace should read The Hebrew Republic—a comprehensive analysis, a compelling vision, a wrenching cri de coeur. Of all the brilliant, brave voices heard here—and there are many—none is as indispensable as Avishai’s, with this book, has now become.”

James Carroll, Author of Constantine’s Sword and House of War

“Bernard Avishai offers a fascinating solution to Israel's existential dilemma: the choice between an ethno-national state, which discriminates against its many non-Jewish citizens, or a binational state that loses its Jewish nature. The book scrutinizes the flaws of Israeli democracy, but is written with a deep love, and provides an upbeat and highly original analysis of the potential of Israel’s new economy. It is a must for anybody who wants to understand today's Israel.”

Prof. Yoram Peri, Head of the Rothschild Caesarea School of Communication, Tel Aviv University, Author of Generals in the Cabinet Room

"The central issue in bringing about peace in the Middle East is whether Israel and the Israelis can find their place in the region where they have carved out their homeland in a manner that is acceptable to others in the region, within and beyond their borders. Bernard Avishai confronts Israelis with the fundamental questions, which only they can answer, and which they cannot indefinitely turn their backs on, about who and what they are. It is hard to imagine clever third-party efforts succeeding as long as these questions remain unanswered. He has made a lucid contribution to solving one of the great problems of our time.”

Amb. Alvaro de Soto, Former UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process