Outside of the strike shortened 1994 season, MLB has had a World Series every year since 1905. Prior to that, there was no World Series in 1904 after the first ever World Series in 1903. The American League itself, of course, at this time was in its infancy, only starting operations in 1901. In what will be a four part series, Bases Empty Blog will be previewing the hypothetical World Series, breaking down the teams involved. As we know, the better team on paper does not always win: see 1914 Philadelphia Athletics, 1960 New York Yankees, 1969 Baltimore Orioles, 1988 and 1990 Oakland Athletics, and a handful of others. In the 3 World Series that could have been, I will break down the teams as they would have matched up against each other. Before I do that, I will spend a little time reminding the readers what the teams looked like and who they held off the win the respective pennants. The American League started its play in time for the 1901 season. The league consisted of 8 teams, the Boston Americans, Cleveland Blues, Milwaukee Brewers, Baltimore Orioles, Detroit Tigers, Chicago White Sox, Philadelphia Athletics and Washington Senators. Because of the fact nobody knew that this league would last, it was referred to as the "junior circuit." Though there was some very good players and well knowns that chose to play in the new league, the majority of the stars played in the National League. Because of those and other reasons, it is understood why there was no World Series played until 1903. And even with that, the sentiment was that the World Series would be just an exhibition, as the National League, mainly the Giants and Reds, thought of themselves as the superior and only "major league." The first American League team to take home the Pennant was the Chicago White Sox, managed by Clark Griffith. Griffith was still an active pitcher and went 24-7, 2.69 leading the pitching staff. Of course, Griffith would later become pitcher and manager for the New York Highlanders, then manager and later owner of the Washington Senators. An overall balanced attack allowed them to score 819 runs and give up 631. The White Sox, who were 83-53, held off the Boston team by 4 games. The Tigers finished 8.5 games back, with the Athletics 9 and the Orioles finishing 13.5 games out but still 3 games over .500. The Senators, Blues and Brewers rounded out the league as each team finished well under .500 and over 20 games back. Outside of Griffith, the most notable White Sox player was OF Dummy Hoy- who by the way, belongs in Baseball's Hall of Fame. Hoy hit .294, 2, 60 with 27 SB, 112 RS, 28 2B and 11 3B at age 39. The most prominent position players for the White Sox were 2B Sam Mertes and 3B Fred Hartman. Mertes, who would later star for the NL's New York Giants, hit .297, 5, 98 with 47 SB, 16 2B, 17 3B and 94 RS. Hartman had one of his only full, successful seasons as he hit .309, 3, 89 with 31 SB and 13 3Bs. Ironically, Hartman played for the Giants in 1897 and 1898 after a season with the St Louis Browns of the NL. He was 37 and after another season in St Louis, this time with the team known as the Cardinals, he was done playing MLB. Going forward and working backwards, it is easy to see how dominant the Pittsburgh Pirates were. The NL Champions of 1902 and 1903 also won the Pennant in 1901. OF/ manager Fred Clarke and SS/ OF Honus Wagner. It was Wagner who had one of his best seasons, hitting .353, 6, 126 with 101 RS, 194 hits, 37 2B and 11 3B. he stole 49 bases and OPSed .911. Young 3B Tommy Leach was just breaking in, so the performances of OF Ginger Beaumont (.332, 8, 72, 120 RS, 185 hits) and 1B Kitty Bransfield (.295, 0, 91. 16 3B) led paced the team after Wagner. The Pirates held off the Philadelphia Phillies by 7.5 games and the Brooklyn Superbas by 9.5 games. The team would improve drastically over the next couple seasons, with the 1902 team being much superior. The Pirates won 90 games in 1901, with 103 wins in 1902 and another 91 in 1903. I'd give the Pirates the advantage in the pitching department as they possessed a strong starting staff, led by Deacon Phillippe, Jack Chesbro and Jesse Tannehill. Ed Doheny came over from the Giants. Outside of Griffith and Roy Patterson (20-15, 3.37), the White Sox lacked the depth, though Jimmy Callahan went 15-8, 2.42 in 22 starts. Offensively, the White Sox were a slightly better offensive team, and like I said before, the Pirates offense got better in 1902 and 1903, as they won two more NL Pennants. This would have been the closest World Series out of the three fictitious ones I have previewed. This would have come down to the Pirates pitching against the White Sox hitters. In a 9 game series, I think this could have gone the distance. Saying that would make the series a pick-em. I take the Pirates, 5 games to 4. This series set up a balanced matchup against two even teams. It would have been a perfect first World Series and if it happened, there would have never been a dispute over which league was superior. Yes, the NL was referred to as the senior circuit and the AL as the junior circuit, but a well played first World Series would have set the tone. Going back in time, if we had a well played 1901 series, the Pirates winning back to back series and the AL Champion Americans winning in 1903, the Giants likely never play the power trip and there is a World Series played in 1904.

Outside of the strike shortened 1994 season, MLB has had a World Series every year since 1905. Prior to that, there was no World Series in 1904 after the first ever World Series in 1903. The American League itself, of course, at this time was in its infancy, only starting operations in 1901. In what will be a four part series, Bases Empty Blog will be previewing the hypothetical World Series, breaking down the teams involved. As we know, the better team on paper does not always win: see 1914 Philadelphia Athletics, 1960 New York Yankees, 1969 Baltimore Orioles, 1988 and 1990 Oakland Athletics, and a handful of others. In the 3 World Series that could have been, I will break down the teams as they would have matched up against each other. Before I do that, I will spend a little time reminding the readers what the teams looked like and who they held off the win the respective pennants. If the National League and American League decided to play a World Series a year earlier, it would have featured the American League Champion Philadelphia Athletics against the National League Champion Pittsburgh Pirates. The World Series winner would have come out of the state of Pennsylvania, with manager Connie Mack trying to counter the best player on the field, Honus Wagner. HOF player/ manager Fred Clarke would lead the Pirates, who had just finished winning their second out of 3 straight NL Pennants. The Athletics themselves had just won their first ever AL Pennant, also the first for Mack as a manager. The Athletics won their league by 5 games over the St Louis Browns, finished 6 and a half ahead of the Boston Americans and 8 games ahead of the Chicago White Sox. The Athletics won with the strength of their pitching, led by Hall of Famers Eddie Plank (20-15, 3.30) and Rube Waddell (24-7, 2.05). OF Socks Seybold set the American League record in home runs for a season with 16, a record that would last until Babe Ruth hit 29 in 1919 for the Red Sox. 3B Lave Cross would drive in 108 runs without hitting a home run, hitting .342 for the season. Also making appearances on the 1902 Athletics were future Hall of Famers Napoleon Lajoie and Elmer Flick. 1B Harry Davis hit .307, 6, 92 with 42 doubles to pace Philadelphia. The Pirates also had a good group of starting pitchers led by Jack Chesbro (28-6, 2.17), Deacon Phillippe (20-9, 2.05) and Jesse Tannehill (20-6, 2.95). Phillippe started out his big league career with five straight 20 win seasons, his forth was for the 1902 Pirates. Tannehill would later be an integral cog in the 1904 Boston Americans rotation, a team that would win the AL Pennant. Ed Doheny, whose difficult life I have discussed in Bases Empty Blog, won 16 games for the Pirates, just a season after leaving the New York Giants. There was no doubt that the Pirates were the best team in the NL. They went 103-36, finishing with an astonishing .741 winning percentage. The Brooklyn Superbas finished in 2nd, 27.5 games out of 1st place! Tommy Leach led both the Pirates and the National League with 22 3Bs and 6 HR. If the Athletics were going to compete in this series, they would have needed to get superior performances by Plank and Waddell. Waddell did have one of his best seasons, so while Plank vs Chesbro may have been a wash, Waddell would have had a distinct advantage over either Phillippe or Tannehill. The Pirates, similar to most NL teams, played small ball, stole bases and advanced runners very well. This would have allowed them to be able to take home a couple runs against even the most dominant of pitchers. My outlook on this series would have predicted an easy win for the Pirates. The Athletics, of course, would get better over the next several seasons, but I don't think this team could have competed with the mighty Pirates. In a best of 9 series, I would take the Pirates in 6. The only reason I would not predict a sweep is that I feel either Plank or Waddell would have thrown a shutout or gem, giving the Athletics a win. If the Pirates had won, they would have now won 6 World Series Championships. The Athletics would be winners of 10 World Series had they found a way to pull out the 1902 Fall Classic in an upset.