Knowing the truth about "9/11" is very important as it is the biggest crime in American history and the justification for The War On Terror.
I have waded through many, many conspiracy theories about "9/11" and here is a brief summary of what I believe is the most pertinent truth of what happened on 11 September, 2001, why and how.
The criminal Jewish, Zionist and Israeli connection to "9/11"
9/11, bin Laden and the war in Afghanistan
The controlled demolition of WTC7

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/terror
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/terrorism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism
Why do we need special laws for terrorism? I don't see why a terrorist killing ten people is any worse than any other mass murderer killing ten people. Are we now judging murder by how much of an emotion it creates? It seems to me terrorism is wrongly used as an excuse to further the authoritarian police state agenda. What do you think?

If the truth is anti-Semitic then I am a proud anti-Semite.
You should know there was no "maybe" or "likely" about it; "he's the one who told me 11 months before 9/11 ever happened that there was going to be an event . . . and out of that event we would invade Afghanistan to run pipelines from the Caspian Sea; we were going to invade Iraq you know to take over the oilfields and establish a base in The Middle East and make it all part of the new world order . . .". It is not drawing a long bow.
And the fact that the interviewer was Alex Jones does not make Russo any less credible.
I haven't seen the evidence in the link debunked.
I do not consider myself "competent to critique the official documentation on 9/11". That does not mean I do not know of facts that contradict the official documentation.

I suggest you check out the Youtube clip in the OP.
Why do you call it rubbish? Do you think it not significant that 11 months before the planes hit the buildings Nicholas Rockefeller told Aaron Russo there was going to be an event and out of that event 'we' would invade Afghanistan and Iraq?
Which link?
I did not claim it is new. That does not mean it is not relevant. Why do you not consider the evidence I provided to be evidence?

I had a look at the RationalWiki link and, as I suspected, I didn't find anything that anything that addressed the evidence that was presented in the OP.
I also had a look at past discussions on Atomic and the closest I found to you rebutting what I presented in the OP (of this thread) was you saying (without backing it up) Muckraker Report is unreliable or something like that, and the Israeli attack on USS Liberty was a case of mistaken identity which to my mind shows extreme ignorance.
I confess: a lot of the blame for false 9/11 truth lies with me. At times I have not been thorough with my research and I have let poorly supported assertions have attention they did not deserve. This has led to many dismissing all "conspiracy theories". I ask that you try to judge each piece of evidence and this thread on its own merits and not dismiss all 9/11 truth because some 9/11 truth is bad.

...
The main reason I mentioned 'the WTC construction manager (Frank A. De Martini) saying "The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time."' was because of what chrisg said when he said the following:
It must have been a consideration if the buildings were designed to have aircraft crash into them.
Anyway, let's assume the type of 707 mentioned is the 707-120B. According to Boeing its MTOW is 117,000 KG, which according to Frank A. De Martini is what the buildings were designed to withstand a crash from. The type of aircraft that hit the south tower is a 767-200. According to https://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_7672_en.php the MTOW is 136,078 KG and the maximum number of passengers 290. The difference between the MTOW of the 707 and the MTOW of the 767 is 19,078 KG. According to Wikipedia the number of passengers on the plane was 56. The difference between 290 and 56 is 234. 19,078/234 is 81.5 (KG) per passenger and their luggage. So a fully loaded 707-120B is about the same weight as a 767-200 with 56 passengers if each passenger plus their luggage weighs 81.5 KG.

That may be true for the 767-200ER (American Airlines Flight 11) that hit the north tower (although how short of the MTOW it was at the time should be considered, especially because the maximum number of passengers is 290 and the number of passengers on that flight was 81), but not for the Boeing 767-200 (United Airlines Flight 175) that hit the south tower, according to Wikipedia. According to https://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_7672_en.php the MTOW of the 767-200 is 136,078 KG, significantly less than the 151,500 KG MTOW of the 707-320B and 707-320C according to http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/707.pdf. Unless I am missing something.
I read part of it a long time ago. I don't remember how much but I think it would be less than half. Why?