Answers

I'm pro-testing, as long as the rules of the license are not broken. People would cry out against medicinal testing on humans without prior investigations, but without animal tests, no medicines could be marketed, for example.

Animal testing gives a very good indication of the effect a product has. However, it does imply the risk of harm to animals, something that must be minimised as much as possible in any case.

Cosmetics should not be tested on animals, in my opinion. They are not essential for human life.

I see the prerequisites stringent enough. If they are broken, then the law should crack down on them hard, however.

I'm 28, male, an analytical chemistry researcher who does not work with animals, and I completed higher education.