Libertarians -- Another "Jews Against Communism"

March 10, 2012

(left, Bernard Baruch, 1870-1965)

Ninety per centof the
funding for "American Jewish League Against Communism" came from Rothschild front-man Bernard Baruch.

The Rothschilds,
who controlled the "socialist" Roosevelt administration and backed the
Bolshevik Revolution, were also, via Baruch and Kohlberg, behind the "right-wing"
John Birch Society and the Libertarian movement...It is time to realize that the real dialectic is the Illuminati bankers versus humanity.

In How the Illuminati $pawn Libertarians, Anthony Migchels
explained how a myriad Libertarian organizations were funded by the Illuminati
Money Power. The purpose of
this funding is to conceal the Illuminati's creation of
Communism.

As explained in Illuminati Bankers
controlled Joseph McCarthy, there were only two
purposes for the founding of AJLAC:
"the number one purpose
was to take the heat off the Jewishness of Communism, and a secondary aim was
to get the Jews out of Communism and to support Zionism."

The chairman of the AJLAC
was Jewish businessman Alfred Kohlberg head of the so-called "China Lobby". The same Kohlberg, a close ally of Senator McCarthy, also co-founded
the John Birch Society with Robert Welch and Fred Koch, head of Koch Industries.

Ninety per centof the
funding for AJLAC came from Bernard Baruch,
according to Norman Marks, a member of the national board of the AJLAC. But
Baruch explicitly demanded his contribution be concealed. He was essentially
hiding behind Kohlberg.

Baruch, who had bought Woodrow
Wilson's letters to his mistress for $65,000 (an enormous sum at the time),
wound up directing Wilson's presidency from behind the scenes along with "Colonel"
Edward Mandell House. As head of the War Industries Board during World War I, Baruch practically controlled
the entire industrial output of the United States.He and his cronies profited accordingly.

At Versailles, Baruch was adviser to the Zionist delegation that clamored for the British Protectorate in
Palestine that led to the State of Israel.

So, in a nutshell: The Rothschilds,
who controlled the "socialist" Roosevelt administration and backed the
Bolshevik Revolution, were also, via Baruch, via Kohlberg, behind the "right-wing"
John Birch Society and the funding of the Libertarian movement in the United
States.Libertarians were just another "Jews Against Communism." (See "Proof Libertarians an Illuminati Ploy." )

The Rockefeller connection

The Rockefellers also
contributed to right-wing causes.

Initially, William Volker
did not intend for his foundation to support Libertarian think
tanks. However, when Volker's nephew Harold Luhnow took control of the Volker
Fund, its orientation changed.

During the 1930s, Luhnow connected with longtime activist Loren Miller, who headed the Detroit Bureau of Governmental Research (BGR).

The BGR
was directly funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, and Miller was probably
a Rockefeller agent.

Miller went on to oversee the activities of the Volker
Fund and attended the first Mont Pelerin Society meeting. In fact, both the
Volker Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation supported the Mont Pelerin
gatherings for over a decade.

Importantly, the involvement of the Rockefeller
dynasty in promoting Austrian economics predates the Volker Fund. Indeed,
David Rockefeller, who was taught by Hayek in London, "had been intermittently
subsidizing Hayek since his Vienna days at Mises' business cycle institute."

Already in 1926, Ludwig von Mises's first tour in the United
States was paid by the Rockefeller Foundation. The National Bureau
of Economic Research, which supported Mises in the 1940s, was also heavily sponsored by the Rockefeller
Foundation. Mises's salary in New York was paid by Lawrence Fertig, Kohlberg's
colleague at the AJLAC, and by the Volker Fund.

Working both sides of
the dialectic

As Antony
Sutton shows, Wall Street funding for the Bolshevik Revolution was organized
from 120 Broadway St. in New York, in what Sutton called "the
Morgan-Rockefeller complex".

In the late 1910s and 1920s, both Roosevelt and Baruch
worked at 120 Broadway Street, where several major financial concerns were
located, including the general offices of the American International
Corporation and the New York branch of the Federal Reserve.

Working both sides
of the dialectic, Baruch, who was a lover of Clare Booth Luce,
future wife of media mogul Henry Luce, and a friend of editor William L. White,
arranged for the Reader's Digest to
publish, in 1945, a widely circulated condensed version of Hayek's Road to Serfdom.

Comments for "Libertarians -- Another "Jews Against Communism""

Stephen said (March 12, 2012):

Reply to Marcos,

Memehunter carefully and ingeniously connects the dots. Do you know about the American system of economics of Hamilton, List, Paine, JQ Adams, Clay, Carey and Lincoln? Liberalism took over what vestiges were left of the Americans system in 1971 when Nixon took down Bretton Woods. Kennedy sought to return us to the American system, that and his unwillingness to perpetuate the Vietnam War is what got him assassinated.

The American system was built with high tariffs to protect our physically productive base from foreign speculators and dumping. New physically productive ventures such as farming, mining and manufactures were given 17 years of tax free operation. This prevented established enterprises from squashing new competition. In addition inheritance taxes were meant for the express purpose to prevent oligarchical monstrosities such as the Bushes, Dulleses, Duponts and Rockefellers.

The Government funded major infrastructure projects to aid the transportation of physical goods greatly stimulating the economy.

Funding was created by US congress issuing credit through the national bank at low 1 to 2% interest, strictly for physical production. This bank in turn funded private community banks that funded non physically productive enterprises such as retail and mortgages.

"Real free economy" has created the monster that we are currently suffering under. Real free economy allows the bullies to take over and accumulate wealth by currency manipulation and speculation. Many of today's derivatives and other types of investments were illegal just a few decades ago for good reason. This is why we need to reinstate the Glass/Steagall act to save the economy, without it, it can't be saved. But that is just the beginning................

Lincoln took a hopeless bankrupt nation, while fighting our bloodiest war and turned the USA into the world's leading economy. Ron Paul has no idea how repeat such a change.

Robert said (March 11, 2012):

Marco says the author "never gives us any other alternative, because there is none." What about the approach that was attacked, rather than (like Communism and Libertarianism) promulgated, using Rockefeller financing, and mention of which has been censored in all major (banker-controlled) media for well over half a century? I'm referring to the "Social Credit" writings of the Scottish engineer Major Clifford Hugh Douglas.

Anthony- reply to Carlos said (March 11, 2012):

The series about the background, financing and build up of Libertarianism was actually inspired by Austrianism's blatantly stiff headed defense of indefensible concepts. It ignores control of the Money Supply by the Money Power through both paper and Gold. It in fact states that 'Bankers hate Gold' which is the most outrageous lie circulating within the Alternative Media that I know of. It ignores interest on the money supply, which is the basic tool of domination. It ignores Gold's deflationary tendencies. In fact, it clamors for deflation and actively defends it!

Libertarianism overstates the case for free markets. Is there any doubt that Standard Oil had to be busted as a trust? By going overboard with free market capitalism Libertarianism paves the way for monopoly capitalism.

Classical American liberalism as mentioned by Marcos existed at times in the American Colonies, when they were able to print their own paper scrip or later paper dollars. That's why they actually went to war: the Crown demanded payment in Gold while the Colonies were built upon interest free paper. An interest free money supply is a sine qua non for such an economy! We must end interest slavery!

Libertarianism parades as such classical Liberalism, always whining about statists hating Liberty, Choice and Freedom when somebody dares challenging their positions. But the articles have proven without a doubt that their policies are free lunch for the rich and that's why they invested so much effort and money in building it up.

Anthony said (March 11, 2012):

The series about the background, financing and build up of Libertarianism was actually inspired by Austrianism's blatantly stiff headed defense of indefensible concepts. It ignores control of the Money Supply by the Money Power through both paper and Gold. It in fact states that 'Bankers hate Gold' which is the most outrageous lie circulating within the Alternative Media that I know of. It ignores interest on the money supply, which is the basic tool of domination. It ignores Gold's deflationary tendencies. In fact, it clamors for deflation and actively defends it!

Libertarianism overstates the case for free markets. Is there any doubt that Standard Oil had to be busted as a trust? By going overboard with free market capitalism Libertarianism paves the way for monopoly capitalism.

Classical American liberalism as mentioned by Marcos existed at times in the American Colonies, when they were able to print their own paper scrip or later paper dollars. That's why they actually went to war: the Crown demanded payment in Gold while the Colonies were built upon interest free paper. An interest free money supply is a sine qua non for such an economy! We must end interest slavery!

Libertarianism parades as such classical Liberalism, always whining about statists hating Liberty, Choice and Freedom when somebody dares challenging their positions. But the articles have proven without a doubt that their policies are free lunch for the rich and that's why they invested so much effort and money in building it up.

Marcos said (March 11, 2012):

The article is short sighted and lead us to a wrong conclusion.
If an evil person invests in something good, as perhaps Rockefeller has done in Libertarianism, we should ask why. Either it is because he benefits from it or because he wants to corrupt it from the inside.

The rich Illuminati needed American capitalism in order to establish a base of production. Markets and people's behavior work in the way described in Austrian economics: like gravity, it is unavoidable. They got rich, but bankers outside liberalism in Europe were the ones who really got the power. And liberalism is so good that got average Americans rich too. They know that only liberalism creates real wealth. But wealth in the hands of common citizens is a no-no for them.

This doesn't mean that, once their fortunes are consolidated and most of all, their political power structure is created (new world order), they will keep following Austrian economics. On the contrary, the NWO is socio-fascist and hates individual liberty, political or economic. Their socialism now will milk the work of Americans until the cow is dead.

So this is NOT a case of dialectics, but simply a case of profiting from a system before changing to another when the time is right. They are simply replacing the healthy liberalism in America with social darwinism from China. What once was done with prosperity for all workers, is now done in slavery. Real wealth must flow from some place.

Memehunters articles are misleading because the only effect they have is to bash real free economy, the only alternative to the Illuminati system. Qui bono ? Who benefits ? He never gives us any other alternative, because there is none. Saying that "we have to find our own solutions" is not a solution, and is only helping the Illuminati's plan of consolidating socio-fascism in the West.

Henry, Memehunter is the perfect example of young Americans who hate their own countries. A great creation from the Illuminati propaganda and education.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at