The House on Wednesday passed H.R. 847, the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, by a vote of 268-160. The emotional/political force achieved by invoking the victims of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, overwhelmed any substantive critique of the legislation.

For example, the bill included a $7.4 billion tax increase on foreign companies with U.S. operations included in the legislation, criticized by Rep. Charles Boustany (R-LA): "This tax increase will make it less attractive for many of these 'in-sourcing' companies to initiate or expand operations here in the United States. Potentially encouraging them to ship these jobs overseas."

The politics of medical liability reform made an appearance. A motion to recommit introduced by Rep. Chris Lee (R-NY) included a package of medical liability reforms that House Republicans contend should have been in the new health care law. That motion failed 185-244. And there was talk of paying for the bill by eliminating or delaying other parts of the expanded federal health care programs. Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) raged in response:

You want to re-litigate the health-care bill? OK, we're going to get to do that the first Tuesday of November. People are going to be talking was the health-care bill a good bill or a bad bill? Let's do that later. Let's do the politics later. Let's do the right thing now.

There was a lot of this making of implicit threats: We must put aside politics on this bill, and if you don't, we'll denounce you for being against the victims of 9/11.