How about:
The suggested standards in this document are intended to conform to the
standards and best practices coming out of the work of other efforts, such
as P3P, WAI and Internet filters. In those cases were we recommend building
and extending some of this work, as in the case of Safe Web Browsing and
filtering, it is noted in the recommendation.
Dan
_____
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 6:11 PM
To: Thomas Roessler
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: P3P, , Internet filters and WAI
Since the topic keeps coming up, saying something should help. I would very
much like someone to propose something even better than what I proposed.
Mez
Re: P3P, , Internet filters and WAI
Thomas Roessler
to:
Mary Ellen Zurko
07/22/2007 03:03 PM
Cc:
public-wsc-wg
_____
On 2007-07-20 08:00:41 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> I propose we add the following paragraph to what is currently the
> end of the overview (I also considered this for goals or scope,
> so if someone thinks it should be there instead, please say):
> As a W3C working group, we will be developing to W3C standards.
Of course we are, but not only. I wonder if this statement isn't
likely to cause more confusion than enlightenment among readers --
one way to misread it (absurdly) would be to claim that we're not
paying attention to anything but W3C statements.
Maybe this is another case of trying to restate very general and
very fundamental principles, but poorly?
Just a thought...
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>