The current degree classification system is not fit for purpose, and needs to be revamped, writes Gemma Tumelty, president of the National Union of Students.

The existing four-mark system, with its arbitrary cut-off points, does not adequately reflect a student's achievements. Many students are involved in a wide range of activities in their unions and local communities, and this should be reflected in their overall qualification.

For instance, my degree is in psychology, but the experience I gained at university far exceeds this narrow academic definition.

When I apply for a job, I would hope that my work with my students' union, or my work as a volunteer, mentor and course representative is taken into account. And surely someone who has worked on their student newspaper for three years can reasonably expect that this will stand them in good stead when they are applying for a job with their local rag.

So isn't it time that non-academic skills are formally reflected on a degree certificate, rather than being relegated to the final page of a CV?

We at NUS believe that it is, so we are pleased that the Burgess Group has recognised the need for change by laying out recommendations for universities to measure and record non-formal learning. At last, there could in the future be some sort of official accreditation for extra-curricular experience.

Having said this, the proposed reforms are not as radical or wide reaching as we would have liked, and it is frustrating that some sections of the sector are dragging their heels on this issue. We need everyone on board if we are to create a system that can be readily understood by institutions, graduates and employees alike.

With record numbers of students earning degrees, it is more important than ever that prospective employers are given more than just a number on which to judge them.