<quoted text>You have no evidence or there are no scientific evidence that will truly tell us of how the universe came about or into existence.Faith based evidence stands out.

Precisely what happen after 10^-34th of a second (thats a very tiny fraction of a second billions of times faster than a single clock tick on the fastest computer known to man) following the event known as the Big Bang is known. Science is working to push those boundaries further, the mathematics exists.

The babble bashers arent bothering, they are resistant to modern understanding of science because it contradicts a bronze age delusion that goddodit

Faith based evidence? A bronze age guess based on NO evidence is not evidence. Its delusion.

What it says is  we dont know how the universe happened so good must have done it  thats the mantra of deliberate ignorance.

The God of the Bible did create the heaven and the earth which includes all things in the universe. God shows patterns as to how things are to be built or proceed. SCP concept or Systems Cycles Patterns theory has claimed this is how things work from the start.

<quoted text>No it's official writings in stone that revealed the proof of King David and the house of David.Atheist long used King David as proof that the Bible was not historically accurate. Then they find the proof that King David did in fact exist exactly as the Bible described. And atheist try and trash that proof. Here's to trying to have it both ways.

And Troy existed just as the Illyad described. Therefore Zeus is real.

If you got a problem with atheists I suggest you take it up with them.

<quoted text>"Debunking:noun1: what one does when they roll over and see KK in the bunk with them."You didn't like this?

Didn't care. Rhetorical dismissals don't address the evidence. It doesn't matter a bit if Darwin was Ghengis Khan. It has no bearing on the scientific validity of evolution. Tycho Brahe was an ahole but that doesn't falsify astronomy.(shrug)

<quoted text>Well true to form you don't know what the hell your talking about .Hitler even had a list of where the races were on the scale.Number one were the Aryans, 2. were the nordic type peoples, whites in general , then the asians with, followed by colors,blacks then jews.Hitler didn't give a shit about the church or christians,ask Dietrich Bonhoffer.

Hitler's religious opinions are irrelevant to the scientific validity of evolution. He had his own ideas about theism which did not necessarily concur with the church. However theism is irrelevant to science.

<quoted text>Lord your a dumbass, taking Hitler at his word, Ha,Ha,Ha. Didn't the Russians and the English do that?

So when Hitler says he's a theist we're not supposed to take him at his word, but if he says he bases his ideology on evolution we're supposed to take him at his word? Even though he was using it wrong?

They aren't baseless, I cite the evidence with it. You never address it therefore there is no reason to presume there is a problem. Especially since the scientific community agrees with me and you're scientifically illiterate.

Charles Idemi wrote:

Instead of criticisms, do your research.

LIKEWISE!

Charles Idemi wrote:

Do you know what will happen to you in the next 3 hours?

Actually I have a pretty good idea, yeah.

Charles Idemi wrote:

Our lives is in the very hands of God. Know that, Mr. Sceptic.

Metaphorically speaking that sounds cool to me.

Charles Idemi wrote:

You have no evidence or there are no scientific evidence that will truly tell us of how the universe came about or into existence.Faith based evidence stands out.

And that's why I've never claimed that science knows for certain. Yet here I am in a position where you need to have the concepts of "theory" and "hypothesis" to you all over again. Keep in mind you don't even have those, hence faith-based evidence stands out.

Charles Idemi wrote:

The heck is that, you are a liar!Simple.

Yes, very simple. You're incapable of debate so it's much simpler to accuse others of lying for daring to disagree with you. After all, you are important.

Charles, It's not that your bark is worse than your bite. It's that you're like a 20 year old toothless mutt who's out to gum everyone to death....you should have figured out by now that when others talk about "your bite", it's more about your odor then your teeth.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.