The World Needs A New Catholic Political Party

Life is beautiful, democratic life is beautiful too, and a really good
Catholic democracy is the prettiest!

But in the Province of Quebec these days, there is no good Catholic
political party. It's a disastrous shortcoming, which must be fixed!
The Province of Quebec needs a new Catholic political party.

Actually, if I look at the other Canadian provinces, or Canada as a whole (federal
level), or the United States of America, or Europe, etc., I don't really see the kind of
political party that we greatly need. So it's not just the Province of
Quebec that needs this, its the whole World!

2.1) What basic orientation should we give to this new party? Let's think
about it. A good political party must propose the best solutions to
the worst problems. But, what is currently the worst problem?

To find out, we must think about the nature of all societies. What is one
of the corner stones of a civilized society? Human rights! Think about it:
What's the use of having well-paved roads, without potholes, if the police
can arrest you for no reason? What's the use of eliminating waiting lines
in hospital emergency wards, if your neighbors can kidnap your children and
steal your car? What's the use of eliminating greenhouse gases, if you have
no rights?

Now, given human rights are fundamental, which is the most fundamental human
right? For example, what is the first thing you need, if you want to have
a citizen who has a right to education, a right to clean drinking water,
and a right to freedom of expression? A citizen, of course! (If that citizen
has been killed, there's not much use giving him all the other rights!)
Therefore, the most fundamental right is the right to life. And since human
rights are already the most fundamental things in any society, we can say that
the right to life is doubly fundamental: it is fundamentally
fundamental.

But currently in Canada (and therefore in Quebec), anybody can kill any
pre-born child for any reason, from conception to childbirth. We live in a
barbaric country where the right to life is violated. Now that is a problem
that should have a good chance of winnning the "Worst Political Problem Of
Our Times" contest!

2.2)
Now, what is the fundamental solution? By and large, our political problems are not
caused by a lack of information. We know polluting the environment is bad. We know
saddling our grandchildren with debts so we can live above our means is bad. We know
killing babies is bad. What is missing is the courage to suffer now, so we can reap
huge improvements in the future. Another way of saying the same thing is that we need
the courage to endure "political crucifixions" now, so we can enjoy "political
resurrections" later.

The fundamental solution must be something that will give us this courage to
make the necessary sacrifices. And ultimately, that courage can only have one
source:
a Christian charity
that won't back away from sacrifices, even martyrdom. Only a Catholic democracy
can solve our worst problems.

Furthermore, the capacity to accept suffering for the sake of goodness, truth
and justice is an essential criterion of humanity, because if my own well-being
and safety are ultimately more important than truth and justice, then the power
of the stronger prevails, then violence and untruth reign supreme. Truth and
justice must stand above my comfort and physical well-being, or else my life
itself becomes a lie.
[Spe
salvi, #38]

3.2)Pro pre-born life.
If
babies,
who are most beautiful, most innocent and most vulnerable of God's creatures,
don't have a right to life, there is no hope for our society.

3.3)Pro family life.
The family is the cradle of life, the sanctuary of love, the school of
virtue and the fundamental cell of society. Moreover, the life-long and
exclusive marriage between one
heman
and one woman is the foundation of the family. For the good of the country, we
must repel all attacks against the family, whether it's divorce, unmarried
cohabitation, the legal glorification of
unnatural acts,
work on Sundays, kennels for kids (State day-care centers), bad feminism, etc.

3.5)Pro civil life.
Our nation has the right to exist and to make its language and culture live.
Our basic civil rights must be defended against numerous attacks.
First,
a perverse notion of "multiculturalism" is killing our
freedom
to be ourselves.
Second, the spread of Islam is killing
the Western world.
Third, our own governments are showing a disturbing desire to
kill some of our basic civil liberties.
(But keep in mind the many ills of suicidal "multiculturalism", islamisation,
excessive government, the demographic decline, etc., are but illnesses
which are contracted by a body that is already terribly sickened
by its consumption of poisoned spiritual and moral teachings.)

3.6)Pro democratic life.
Never in the history of mankind have we had so many material means to
encourage democracy (e-mail, web sites, discussion forums, electronic votes,
etc.). Nevertheless, so many things seem to get decided without us! Not
surprizing that so many voters are
cynical!
I myself have been involved in several parties, and I've just about never
been consulted on the development of the positions of those parties! But
it would be so easy to set up a
venue for political discussions,
to organize
real debates,
to build a
web site democratically,
to set up an electronic voting system for policies, to make the
parliamentary system more participative and representative, etc.!

3.7)Pro economic life.
Money isn't God, but we need a minimum of economic prosperity. Citizens must
be weaned from the
welfare State. They must also learn
that material wealth depends first of all on
moral virtue.
They must learn
basic notions
of Economics, they must also have the freedom of economic initiative,
etc.

3.8)Pro environmental life.
Fortunately, some themes are already accepted by all in our society, like
the necessity of protecting the environment. On the other hand, citizens
must learn to expose the
vacuous green speeches
which don't give results. Moreover, some right-wing Christians need to
learn more about
climate change, etc.

Of course, this short article isn't the venue to have all the necessary
debates for the development of a new electoral platform! On the other hand,
we must discuss the objections which tend to prevent these necessary debates.

4.1)"Such a party already exists!"
Great! Sign me up! Unfortunately, as far as I know (as of October 2018), such a party
doesn't already exist. In the Province of Quebec, there used to be one, but it was
blighted with shortcomings and unsalvageble.
In Canada,
the CHP
continues to do wonderful work to bring Biblical principles into
politics, and I'll remain a member until something better
comes along. Finally and ideally, all parties would be Christian! So there is
nothing wrong with having several!

4.2)"We don't have any money!"
First, we do have money (volunteers donate time, and time is money! And
many volunteers willing to donate lots of time is probably the most
essential resource for success). Second, we don't need much to start. The
Internet has changed many things. Members can communicate, read the Party's
documents, vote on new policies, and all that almost for free and
instantaneously. (Worst-case scenario is that an "All-Internet/Paperless" party
will encourage people to learn how to work with a computer, which is an
advantage!) Third, I've personally seen many projects fail miserably, not for
lack of good intentions, but because of financial mis-management (greed, lack of
transparency, accounting incompetence, etc.). I personally prefer starting out
with no budget; it's a great way to filter out people with unrectified
intentions.

4.3)"We don't have any members!"
First, the need is there. If we build it, they will come. Second, objections
of the type "We're too small few to have any influence" have already been
answered, among others here:
Surfing The Wave, Or Making One's Wave?.

4.5)"I don't like the name of your new party!"
First, we don't have an official name yet! So rest a bit before manning
the barricades! Second, and seriously, when the time comes, we'll vote to
chose the name. The result will probably not please everybody, but such is
life in a democracy! Third, for whatever reason, many people seem to
attach a disordinate amount of importance to a party's name, while
simultaneously not worrying very much about its
specific policies!
Let's focus on the contents, and not the container!

4.6)"How come "Catholic"? I'm a Protestant, and it's out of the question
for me to adore idols like the Virgin Mary!"
First, relax. As explained in
#4.4 here above,
our policies are based on reason. Second, as mentioned in
Immortale Dei, #7,
the State must give due honor to God, in the way God Himself specifies.
Third, if you really want to argue about the Virgin Mary, please see
Mariolatry, Or Mariophobia?)

4.7)"Why not start by gathering people around a common concern, like the
environment, instead of something controversial like abortion?"
First, we have to respect the environment because we have to respect human
dignity. If an innocent human person doesn't have the right to life, then
nothing is forbidden.
Even the word "environment" alludes to the central position of man! Second, we
have a huge and serious problem in our society: some citizens can kill other
innocent citizens if they feel like it. Now, if we say: "Hum, that problem is
urgent and critical, but it causes negative feelings. So let us put reason
aside, and instead focus on problems that give us positive feelings." If you
start by abandoning reason, in order to pursue pleasant feelings, you've
already ruined all hope of finding solutions. If you start by closing the light
so you can't see a mess, you won't be able to see anything else!

What should we do now? I would think a reasonable next step would be to all
collaborate to write a good electoral platform for this new provincial party in
Quebec. And again in my opinion, such a platform should first of all be based
on a good generic Catholic electoral platform. The next step would therefore
be: