This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Re: Gun used by illigal immigrant in killing belonged to federal agent

Originally Posted by Hatuey

Source?

Nope, my argument simply addressed the fallacious slippery slope nature of your statement. There are quite a few things which need to be registered to day, none have been banned.

So I take it that you'll no longer make analogies between guns and cars?

I don't, its liberals who stupidly claim guns should have the same licensing requirements-usually because gun banners don't understand the reality: you don't need a license to buy a car, own a car or use a car on private property

Originally Posted by EarlzP

Why would you not want to register your weapon?

Originally Posted by Celebrity

, as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.

Re: Gun used by illigal immigrant in killing belonged to federal agent

Originally Posted by TurtleDude

I don't, its liberals who stupidly claim guns should have the same licensing requirements-usually because gun banners don't understand the reality: you don't need a license to buy a car, own a car or use a car on private property

So what? Why do you think that ends the argument?

Both are potentially dangerous, so we have regulations in place to reduce risk to others.

Re: Gun used by illigal immigrant in killing belonged to federal agent

Originally Posted by TurtleDude

there is no argument because the gun banners have no facts on their side

There it is again. Registration = ban. Background check = ban. ****, I bet you'd be up in arms about a regulation that says "gun manufacturers must ensure their guns don't spontaneously explode in the hands of the user."

Re: Gun used by illigal immigrant in killing belonged to federal agent

Originally Posted by Deuce

There it is again. Registration = ban. Background check = ban. ****, I bet you'd be up in arms about a regulation that says "gun manufacturers must ensure their guns don't spontaneously explode in the hands of the user."

see, that is the moronic type of argument we see from gun restrictionists.

registration serves no useful purpose

every group that wants to ban guns pushes for registration

registration helps facilitate confiscation

it does nothing good for gun owners

and your claim about defective products shows you are completely clueless about this issue

Originally Posted by EarlzP

Why would you not want to register your weapon?

Originally Posted by Celebrity

, as long as you can own one or fewer guns, your right to bear a firearm is not being infringed upon.