Planned Israeli Jordan Valley Annexation?

In May 2011, Netanyahu addressed Congress. He was warmly welcomed. London’s Guardian called it a “love-in.” He received 29 standing ovations.

Jerusalem must remain Israel’s exclusive capital, he said. Loud cheers followed him saying:

“Israel has no better friend than America, and America has no better friend than Israel. We stand together to defend democracy. We stand together to advance peace. We stand together to fight terrorism.”

“Israel will not return to the indefensible boundaries of 1967,” he stressed.

“Places of critical strategic and national importance (will) be incorporated into the final borders of Israel” under any agreement with Palestinians.

“Israel would never cede the Jordan Valley. Israel would never agree to withdraw from the Jordan Valley under any peace agreement signed with the Palestinians.”

“And its vital – absolutely vital – that Israel maintain a long term military presence along the Jordan River.”

She’s a former IDF brigadier general. She served as spokesperson. “It is no secret that the settlements in the valley have a strategic, security, and political importance of the first order,” she said.

“all measures taken by Israel to change the physical character, demographic composition, institutional structure or status of the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, or any part thereof, have no legal validity and that Israel’s policy and practices of settling parts of its population and new immigrants in those territories constitute a flagrant (Fourth Geneva) violation…and also constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East.”

On August 20, 1980, the Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 478. America abstained. Resolution language “censured (Israel) in the strongest terms.” It condemned its Jerusalem Law.

It called it a violation of international law. It refused recognition. Member states were told to withdraw their Jerusalem diplomatic missions immediately.

The Security Council and General Assembly called East Jerusalem occupied territory. Expropriated land is illegal, they said.

They declared Israeli legislative and administrative measures altering the city’s character and status null and void. They ordered them rescinded forthwith. They never were. International community condemnation with teeth never follow.

On July 9, 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that “Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territory, including East Jerusalem, are illegal and an obstacle to peace and to economic and social development (and) have been established in breach of international law.”

It doesn’t matter. Israel flouts international law, UN resolutions and judicial rulings. It does so repeatedly. It ignores what conflicts with its interests.

It operates lawlessly. It does it with impunity. Washington’s backing is firm. It’s longstanding. It lets Israel get away with land theft, ethnic cleansing, murder and lots more.

In 2008, Democrat party platform language stated:

“Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel. The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.

Obama personally insisted on including this language. His position remains unchanged. It’s in gross violation of international law.

It doesn’t matter. Obama, the entire Senate, and nearly all House members support Israel’s worst crimes. Previous US governments did it for decades. They do it today. They do it lawlessly, shamelessly and disgracefully.

Israel is stealing all valued West Bank and East Jerusalem land. It’s doing it dunum by dunum. It’s been ongoing for decades. Judaization is official policy. So is ethnic cleansing unwanted Palestinians.

In 1967, Jordan Valley Palestinian residents numbered around 320,000. Less than 60,000 remain.

Approximately 90% of the area is Judaized. It includes 37 settlements, seven unauthorized outposts, exclusive Jewish development, 26 nature reserves, and closed military zones.

They’re off-limits to Palestinians. Settlers are free to terrorize them. One Palestinian resident spoke for others saying police are supposed to protect people.

“But here, all settlers have to do is call (them) when they want to attack us. They only have to make a phone call, and then do nothing but watch the police and military beat up Palestinians. All of our trouble comes from the settlers.”

In May 2011, B’Tselem released a report titled “Dispossession and Exploitation: Israel’s Policy in the Jordan Valley and Northern Dead Sea.”

Israel maintains control four ways, it said. It exploits land, water, tourist sites and natural resources.

“Israel has closed more than three-quarters of the land area to Palestinians and has prohibited them from working the area’s fertile land.”

“Israel has restricted Palestinian access to water sources such that, in some Palestinian villages, water consumption is minimal and comparable to that of disaster areas.”

“Israel restricts Palestinian movement and prevents Palestinians from building and developing their communities.”

“It has also taken control of the tourist sites and enables private enterprises to exploit and profit from the minerals in the area.”

Israeli economist Shir Hever explained:

“Israel has extensive agribusiness interests in the Jordan Valley, most notably through the company Carmel-Agrexco, which is the main exporter of agricultural products from Israel.”

“Israeli colonist farmers in the Jordan Valley produce products that are sold to Palestinian consumers, Israeli consumers and exported abroad.”

Variations of Yigal Allon’s plan emerged. They called for permanent militarized occupation, exclusive greater Jerusalem control, maximum land with minimum Arabs, and Jordan Valley annexation, among other provisions.

Nearly all Jordan Valley land lies in Area C. It’s about 30% of the West Bank. It’s under exclusive Israeli control. De facto annexation exists. Israeli hardliners want it made official.

Ethnic cleansing remains ongoing. Palestinians are being systematically displaced from their own land.

Entire communities have been ordered to leave. They have no choice. Thousands of Bedouins face loss of their way of life. Many have already.

Israel wants them all out. They represent over one-fourth of Palestine’s Jordan Valley population. Israel denies them vital infrastructure and services.

John Kerry’s notion of Israeli/Palestinian peace is none at all. It includes longterm militarized occupation.

Maintaining it along the Jordan River is prioritized. Kerry wants it ended only if Israel agrees. Effectively he wants it made permanent.

“If Israel’s security can’t increase as a result of an agreement, it’s very difficult to make (one),” he said.

“Obviously, security is paramount in the minds of the prime minister and his team with respect to their ability to move forward on other issues.”

In other words, whatever Israel wants, Washington approves. Kerry has other occupation measures in mind.

He wants a future Palestinian state demilitarized. He wants it defenseless. He wants US drones monitoring conditions on the ground.

He likely wants them replicating what’s ongoing in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

He wants a de facto state of war to exist. He wants Palestinian civilians left vulnerable to drone and ground attacks.

He wants Washington helping Israel maintain border and internal security. He favors billions of US dollars spent to improve Israel’s intelligence and military capability.

About the author:

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected]
His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the
copyright owner.