DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER:I do not attempt to be polite or partisan in my articles, merely truthful. If you are a partisan and believe that the letter after the name of a politician is more important then their policies, I suggest that you stop reading and leave this site immediately--there is nothing here for you.

Modern American politics are corrupt, hyper-partisan, and gridlocked, yet the mainstream media has failed to cover this as anything but politics as usual. This blog allows me to post my views, analysis and criticisms which are too confrontational for posting in mainstream outlets.

I am your host, Josh Sager--a progressive activist, political writer and occupier--and I welcome you to SarcasticLiberal.blogspot.com

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

The New Kleptocracy

Throughout history, humans have arranged themselves
into societies based around hierarchy and a system of selecting who is allowed
to wield power—these social constructs are called governments. At its best, a government
exists to provide the common defense, preserve the rule of law, promote the
social welfare, and do the things which private industry cannot do equitably or
efficiently (ex. maintaining the roads). At its worst, a government can kill
millions, promote exploitation, repress its population, and syphon resources
from the citizens to the elite.

The United States was originally designed to be a
form of representative democracy called a constitutional republic. In this form
of government, citizens elect politicians to represent their interests, both on
the state and federal levels—these politicians are directly accountable to
their constituents. Unfortunately, as money has crept into politics and promoted
an ever increasing centralization of power into the hands of a small group of
elites, the United States has started to look less like a constitutional
republic and more like a kleptocracy.

A Kleptocracy is a type of government where those in
power have turned their authority towards the goal of syphoning wealth from the
general public and giving it to the elite; the elite who benefit in a
kleptocracy include those in government as well as those with significant power
in the private sector. Through utilizing public funds, tax revenue, and
government force for personal gain, the elite in a kleptocracy are able to
accrue huge amounts of wealth and perpetuate their own political power.

I argue that the government of the United States is beginning
to resemble a kleptocracy because it has begun to exhibit several of the
classic characteristics which define a kleptocratic government. While no one of
these characteristics alone classifies a government as a kleptocracy, the
combination of characteristics paints a truly stark picture about how this
country may be transforming from a democracy into a kleptocracy:

Characteristic
#1: The elite in society utilize political power to enrich themselves on the backs
of everybody else

In a kleptocracy, the elite in society create a
vicious cycle of wealth accrual and political power. During the creation of a
kleptocracy, the elite use their wealth and influence to capture the government
and gain the ability to manipulate policy. Once the elite capture the
government, they change policy to benefit themselves and begin to utilize
public money to increase their personal profits. As their personal fortunes
grow, the elite kleptocrats complete the cycle by using a portion of the money
gained from controlling the government to perpetuate their political power. Once
this cycle is initiated, it is very difficult to stop and usually results in
widespread income inequality within a country.

During the last decade, elites in the United States
have been extremely successful in manipulating public policy to favor their
interests. By changing public policy into a method of increasing their wealth
(even at the expense of the country), American elites have begun to make the
United States look very much like a kleptocracy:

Tax rates on wealthy Americans and
corporations are at a record low and it
appears virtually impossible that this will change significantly in the near
future. This decrease in tax income taken from the rich is economically
unjustifiable, yet has been pushed by many wealthy individuals, as well as the
politicians who are bought by them.

Corporate accountability has been
drastically reduced in the United States; this reduction benefits American elites
because it allows their corporate interests to produce more profit for them,
without having to worry about ethics or the danger of being sued. The perfect
example of this destruction of corporate accountability is the lack of charges
and consequences on the banks after the 2008 economic crash. Despite the
presence of a great deal of evidence proving the fraud perpetrated by the banks
in the lead-up to the 2008 crash, no bankers have been prosecuted and no banks
have been broken up.

Government contract are given to corporations
which have economic connections to political elites. In the last decade, American
elites have directed ever more government contracts to corporations which they
control, or which give them money. There are innumerable examples of this
cronyism, but the largest example is that of Cheney and Halliburton. While Cheney—the
ex-CEO and current stockholder of Halliburton—was vice president, Halliburton received
billions in government contracts and preferential treatment in environmental regulations.

Public policy in the United States has been co-opted
and redirected to increase the wealth of a small minority of elites. The good
of society has taken a backseat to interests of the elite and the United States
is suffering for it. When the political and economic elite of a society corrupt
policy to the degree which we have seen in recent years, the corrupted
government ceases to be a populist government and becomes a kleptocracy.

Characteristic
#2: Political power is condensed so that a small group of elites hold a majority
of the control over government

In order for the elite in a kleptocracy to sustain
their policy agendas and control over the government, they must keep political
and economic power centralized within a small group of people. In most cases,
kleptocrats will gain control over a government by either becoming the
political power structure (ex. become a dictator) or utilizing their resources
to gain control over a political party (ex. buying numerous politicians). The
control over government held by elites in a kleptocracy allows them to manipulate
public policy and sustain their political power.

In the United States, the rise of the super-PAC and
demise of campaign finance laws are the two situations which have driven our
democracy towards kleptocracy; we still have the illusion of democracy, but any
choice which we are given is likely to either be bought by the elites, or unlikely
to be elected because of massive opposition by moneyed interests. Elites and
corporate organizations exert political power through giving money (Read:
bribes) to politicians as well as through running political ads to influence voters.

During election seasons, moneyed interests pour huge
amounts of money into running deceptive ads. Deceptive advertisements trick
people into voting against their own interest and into voting for the interests
of those in power. Given the abysmally low level of knowledge that the general
public has surrounding public policy and civics, it is very easy for deceptive
ads to sway marginal (independent) voters away from non-bought politicians.

Once in office, American politicians are faced with
the choice to vote their conscience, doing what is best for their constituents,
and the choice to enrich themselves by doing the bidding of the elite. Unfortunately,
this lure of money is most often too strong for people to resist, and most
politicians are bought by somebody. Once bought, these politicians no longer
work for the people, but rather become the employees of moneyed elites.

With the elimination of campaign finance regulations
allowing a tsunami of secret money to flood the political scene, American
politics have become terrible corrupt. Money may not buy everything, but, if
you have enough, it can buy a government. If the kleptocrats behind the
politicians are the true power, election result don’t matter—any corrupt
politician voted out of office will simply be replaced by the next puppet of
the kleptocratic elite.

Characteristic
#3: Programs which benefit those who are not elite are cut in order to increase
the amount of money available to be shifted to the elite

In a kleptocracy, the goal of government is not to
help the population or sustain a functioning society, but rather to keep
feeding the elites in control of society. To a kleptocrat, any program which does
not benefit them is waste and must be cut, regardless of its benefit to
society. Any money “wasted” on the non-elites of society is money which the
kleptocrats could be putting into their pockets.

Over the past several years, mainstream American
politics has been focused upon cutting the deficit and dealing with the
national debt. Political elites (and corporate interests) have convinced large
portions of the population that cutting from social programs and entitlements
is necessary in order to protect the country from a debt crisis. At the same
time that these elites are proposing draconian cuts to programs which benefit the
average American, they protect programs which give money to corporations and
refuse to consider any possible tax increases on the wealthy; corporate subsidies,
military contracts, and tax cuts on the wealthy bear the lion’s share of the blame
for the current budget problems of the United States, yet political elites are
focused upon cutting the small and effective social programs which support
average Americans. Put plainly, these political elites are not looking out for
the best interest of the country and are simply helping (or part of) the
kleptocratic class which has captured the American government.

If American political elites truly wished to deal
with the deficit, they wouldn’t be protecting the multi-trillion dollar Bush
tax cuts—tax cuts with no actual value to society—while proposing cutting
millions of dollars from the school lunch program. The only possible
justifications for such budget choices are either absolute ignorance of
economics or a desire to protect the elites at the detriment of everybody else.
Any programs not benefiting the American elite are being cut, just so that the
elites are not forced to support anybody else in society and to free up even
more money to give to them through tax cuts (ex. the Ryan Budget).

Characteristic
#4: Dissent from the status-quo is squashed by institutions of the state.

Since a kleptocracy’s goal is to pander to the
interests of an elite few, any dissent by the public is automatically portrayed
as extreme, delegitimized and suppressed. Kleptocrats don’t care about the
opinions of their citizens, nor do they wish for people to get organized in
order to protect their interests. Any such dissent has the potential to disrupt
the status quo, thus reducing personal profits by the kleptocrat or even
resulting in an overthrow of the kleptocracy. In order to suppress uprising,
kleptocrats will often utilize a combination of media control and police force
in order to disrupt protesters and prevent the average citizens from becoming
mobilized.

The reaction to the “Occupy” movement by American
police forces and federal agencies has illustrated just how a kleptocracy will
deal with protests against the status quo. Regardless of ones’ opinions on protest
movements—like the Occupy Movement—it is absolutely inarguable that they have
the right to assemble and protest in the United States. Regardless of the
constitutional protections on their ability to protest, the Occupy movement
spreads a message which is very inconvenient to kleptocratic elites, thus elites
dedicated a significant amount of effort into attacking the Occupiers.

At the outset of the Occupy Movement, the mainstream
media either refused to cover the protests or covered them in a dismissive manner.
Common memes that were used to attack the Occupiers included calling them “dirty
hippies”, “bums”, “unfocused”, or disorganized and not having a coherent message.
Media corporations are often controlled by the very elites who control
politics, so it is well within these elites’ power to affect media coverage.

In concert with the media blackout on the Occupy Movement,
police and federal law enforcement agencies were tasked with suppressing the
occupations. The Occupiers faced numerous mass-arrests and police harassment in
cities across the country; these arrests were coordinated across cities by
federal agencies, despite the fact that there was no justification for such
federal involvement.

In modern America, protests which challenge the status
quo are constantly harried by federal and state interference. In essence,
protest is allowed only if it supports or does not threaten the interests of
those in power (ex. abortion protests are okay because they don’t attack the
moneyed elite).

Conclusion

In the new American kleptocracy, elites are given
every economic advantage and have near-absolute control over policy. Public
policy is becoming increasingly tailored to the benefit of the elite kleptocrats,
and the rest of society is left to suffer the consequences of neglect. Unless
we do something to change the current path of our country, we are facing a
situation where our country will become little more than a field for the
wealthy to harvest and our citizens little more than serfs, indentured to those
with all of the power in society.

Anonymous's Last Incarnation

All Credit to DregStudios

Copyright Disclaimer

While I don't quote sources directly, I receive a large amount of information from the sources listed below. All links that I post to my blog are credited to the publisher listed on the video or article.