EDAL case summaries

This case concerned subsequent applications for asylum. The Constitutional Court ruled that Art 50, (3) and (4) of the Belgian Aliens Law (current Art 51/8) should be interpreted in such a way that the possibility to lodge an appeal for suspension of that decision is only excluded in cases where the following three conditions are met:

(1) the applicant has filed an earlier asylum application that was refused;(2) the applicant has had the opportunity to appeal this decision and to exhaust his legal remedies;(3) the applicant is making an identical asylum application...