Yesterday's big news that Iraq's two-term prime minister and forever
thug Nouri al-Maliki had agreed to step down continues to be news. Al Mada notes
statements of relief made by US Secretary of State John Kerry, National
Security Advisor Susan Rice and the UN Secretary-General's Special
Envoy to Iraq Nickolay Mladenov. Andrew Reiter (US News and World Reports) offers:

This is an unquestionably positive development for Iraq. First, the
peaceful transfer of power represents a key step in Iraq’s young
democracy. Second, the new government should be better equipped to deal
with the worsening security threat posed by Islamic State militants. And
third, it could usher in a period of improved relations with the U.S. A peaceful transfer of power is a welcome development for Iraq’s
nascent democracy that has seen al-Malaki consolidate his rule over his
eight years in office. Following the controversial 2010 parliamentary
elections, al-Malaki created the Office of the Commander-in-Chief,
giving himself direct control over the Iraqi army and police. In
response to recent events, he deployed a number of elite security forces
throughout Baghdad’s Green Zone in an overt threat to his opponents.
Fears of a military coup were rampant.

Loveday Morris and Karen DeYoung (Washington Post) point out, "Maliki has become a deeply divisive figure but had clung to his position
in the face of a growing consensus among Iraq’s politicians and the
international community that only a new leader would have a chance of
unifying a country experiencing growing sectarian divisions." How bad did it get for Nouri? Martin Chulov, Julian Borger and Spencer Ackerman (Guardian) explain, "He had lost the support of his party, of the president, the parliament,
the Americans, Saudis and finally the Iranian government, his biggest
foreign ally and sponsor. Even the Iranian Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei,
issued a statement pointedly welcoming the appointment of Abadi."

An Iraqi source close to Ayatollah
Ali Sistani told Al-Monitor: “Around 10 days before the designation, an
envoy representing the Iranian leadership visited Ayatollah Ali Sistani
in Najaf. The envoy heard a clear stance from Sistani: Nouri al-Maliki
shouldn’t continue as a prime minister. …​ Sistani won’t say this in
public, but he had to tell it to the Iranians, because he thought the
crisis in the country needed a solution and that the deadlock would
complicate efforts to reach an agreement.”According to Al-Monitor’s sources in Tehran and Baghdad, Iranian
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, after learning of Sistani’s
position, asked his aides to facilitate the change, calling on them to
play a role in convincing Maliki to withdraw. “There were several
alternatives for Maliki, one was him being appointed vice president. He
refused. He was obstinate on the prime minister position and gave all
those who tried [to talk] with him reasons for him not to accept. His
main challenge was that he’s the leader of the bloc that won the
election, and the constitution gives him the right to form the new
government.”

REHM: Good to see you all. Jim Sciutto, what finally made Iraqi Prime Minister al-Maliki agree to step aside? SCIUTTO: I think the loss of the support of the support of both the
U.S. and Iran. And once you had public statements. For the U.S.
statement, somewhat more predictable, but once the Iranians said they
wanted a transition, they wanted a more inclusive government, he saw the
writing on the wall. But it was touch and go, because on Sunday night,
and we were on the air Sunday night, as you had tanks in the streets,
bridges closed in Baghdad. Forces loyal to Maliki being ordered -- you
know, accounts from Baghdad police telling us ordered around key
buildings. It looked like, for a moment, he was gonna make a power grab.
So, you know, it appeared he had some second thoughts towards the end,
but once that support disappeared, even he could see the writing on the
wall. REHM: Nancy. YOUSSEF: So, the reason he gave, in his speech, in which he was
surrounded by members of his party and his successor, was, in part, that
he didn't want to see Iraq return to dictatorship, which arguably was
code for that he didn't think that the militias and the armed forces he
put on the street could actually keep him in power. The only other list
-- person I would add to that list is Sistani, Ayatollah Sistani, who's
the leader of the Shias in Iraq had called and supported his transition.
And so, internally, that was perhaps the most important loss for his
support. And so, once all those factors came in to play, it was
impossible to see who would support him. In addition, I would add also
are the court systems, because the last time he had sort of been
challenged, the courts had supported him, and constitutionally, he
didn't have the ground to stand on to continue his fight. REHM: Greg. MYRE: Just looking back, Maliki came to power in 2006. At that
moment, Iran was facing this Sunni insurgency that was tearing the
country apart. The U.S. felt a real sense of urgency to intervene. Here
we are eight years later going through the same thing. And you can go
back, and the U.S. military involvement has now been over 20 years in
Iraq. And are we moving forward anywhere, or are we just going in
circles?

While various possibilities were tossed around at various outlets, few bothered to examine Iraqi sentiment. Kholoud Ramzi (Niqash) covers Iraqi reaction:

The
desperate attempts of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to stay in
power may have been taken seriously by many and led to questions about
attempted coups and concern as to which sectors of the military
supported him - but there are many Iraqis who are not taking al-Maliki
seriously at all. Sarcastic pictures, jokes and comments have been
circulating on Iraqi social media for the past few days, with those
photo shopping pictures and posting jokes appearing to compete amongst
themselves to make a mockery of their soon-to-be-former Prime Minister.

One
of the most popular pictures shows al-Maliki wearing a Hitler-style
moustache. Another shows US President Barack Obama patting al-Maliki on
the back, as if to bid him farewell. This has garnered a number of
humorous comments.

One
Iraqi Kurdish journalist shared a picture that shows young men
trampling on a picture of al-Maliki that is lying on the floor. “They
started to throw your pictures on the ground as soon as they heard about
al-Abadi,” the journalist wrote in the caption. “They started to throw
shoes at the picture as soon as they knew you were out. I fear that soon
they will beat you with their shoes. We Iraqis are the kind of people
who receive our leaders with cheering and applause and then farewell
them with shoes.”

Another
picture showed two tribal leaders, or sheikhs, sitting behind al-Maliki
at a funeral. “Let us grieve for the soul of [al-Maliki’s] third term,”
those who shared the picture wrote. “The funeral of the State of Law
bloc.”

Another
Iraqi prankster posted a picture of al-Maliki’s wife. “Breaking news,”
they wrote. “Al-Abadi’s wife has called al-Maliki’s wife to ask her
where she put the presidential mugs.”

Those
who supported al-Maliki also came in for ribbing, with politicians who
protested al-Abadi’s nomination or al-Maliki’s ouster also targeted by
jokers.

Another
commenter wrote this: “Al-Maliki ruled us for eight years and he
brought us right back to the era of the Caliphate. If he had had another
four years, we might have seen dinosaurs roaming the streets of
Baghdad”.

Some
other activists wrote on one of al-Maliki’s Facebook pictures that
Iraqis need to thank the Prime Minister for his achievements before he
leaves. They listed 14 of the most important ones. This included
sectarianism, displacement, insecurity, corruption and lack of
government services. “Last but not least we should congratulate him on
the birth of Daash, which came from all of these achievements,” they
wrote, using the Arabic acronym for the Sunni Muslim extremist group
known as the Islamic State, that now controls parts of the country.

Deeply unpopular Nouri. So many have wanted him gone for so long now. And where do things stand now? Shashank Bengali and Patrick J. McDonnell (Los Angeles Times) state, "Maliki’s surprise announcement Thursday that he would give up his bid
for a third four-year term raised hope that a new government could unite
a country that is more bitterly divided than at perhaps any time since
the sectarian civil strife of 2006-07."

So few want to admit that. In part because they whored for Nouri and in
part because they lack the ability to they were wrong to cheer Nouri
on. The man was a tyrant and a despot. He had Iraqis rounded up --
usually Sunnis -- mass 'arrests' that lacked arrest warrants. The
people were then lost in the 'legal' system -- often never tried, not on
trial once, but kept in prisons. Some people were arrested with arrest
warrants -- for other people!

They have an arrest warrent for Ali al-Mutlaq. They go to his family's
home. Ali is not present so they arrest Ali's wife, sister, child or
parent. That's not justice. It is why so many innocents rot in prison
-- accused of no crime but held regardless.

Many of the females in Nouri's prison arrived there as a result of being
a relative of someone. Once in prison, many girls and women were
assaulted or raped. Nouri attempted to ignore this when it became the
topic of fall 2012. An investigation by Parliament found that the
assaults and rapes were taking place -- this would also be backed up by the work of Human Rights Watch:

Iraqi authorities are detaining thousands of Iraqi women illegally and
subjecting many to torture and ill-treatment, including the threat of
sexual abuse. Iraq’s
weak judiciary, plagued by corruption, frequently bases convictions on
coerced confessions, and trial proceedings fall far short of
international standards. Many women were detained for months or even
years without charge before seeing a judge.The 105-page report, “‘No One Is Safe’: Abuses of Women in Iraq’s Criminal Justice System,”documents
abuses of women in detention based on interviews with women and girls,
Sunni and Shia, in prison; their families and lawyers; and medical
service providers in the prisons at a time of escalating violence
involving security forces and armed groups. Human Rights Watch also
reviewed court documents and extensive information received in meetings
with Iraqi authorities including Justice, Interior, Defense, and Human
Rights ministry officials, and two deputy prime ministers.“Iraqi security forces and officials act as if brutally abusing women will make the country safer,” said Joe Stork,
deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “In
fact, these women and their relatives have told us that as long as
security forces abuse people with impunity, we can only expect security
conditions to worsen.”