Hold Congress Accountable

Knowledge is power. It makes sure people understand what is happening to their country, and how they can make a difference. FreedomWorks University will give you the tools to understand economics, the workings of government, the history of the American legal system, and the most important debates facing our nation today. Enroll in FreedomWorks University today!

Search FreedomWorks

Resources

Blog

Governor Nikki Haley on Health Care: Part Two

Last week, I covered the first portion of my interview with South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley. In the next part of our discussion, Governor Haley relayed the efforts by South Carolina to improve health care in the state.

"We are taking the lead in the country on payment reform. We had $40 million alone in payments and we tied it to performance. Which meant that we have to actually produce better health, but more than that, we’re getting our Medicaid beneficiaries to be more engaged in their health."

Like many government programs, follow up, or the lack thereof has been a factor in producing positive results.

"If a doctor tells you to stop smoking and you don’t, we can’t continue to work with you. If a doctor tells you to take prescriptions and you don’t, we can’t continue to work with you. So to try and improve that patient engagement, to get them to care or else they will lose their benefits and to get us a better quality outcome will be an amazing improvement for healthcare. Then all of a sudden we’ve gone from talking about cost to talking about outcome...our focus is, is what can we do in terms of measurables? How do we go about doing that and what do we have to show for it?

I asked Governor Haley to clarify her point on what exactly the state could do should a patient not follow their doctor's directions.

"Well what we’ve already done is, like I said, $40 million of the payments are tied to performance so what we are doing is we’re getting them engaged. What we’re saying is they have to get involved with what their doctors are saying, they have to get engaged in that. From a federal standpoint, we have not clarified whether we can actually take that money away. What we are saying is we’re going to start to engage you in this process because you should want to be healthy. You know a lot of times the doctor will tell a patient to do something and then there’s no follow-up. This is more of making sure that the doctors and the patients are more engaged, follow-up is involved and then we’re seeing exactly who is and who is not following the directions that they are supposed to. You know when you talk about payment reform or performance, doctors love it because that’s the most frustrating part that they have with Medicaid patients is they come in and they go and they get a prescription and then they either don’t take it or they either don’t do what they’re supposed to and the doctors see them again and the doctor’s already taking a cut from what he’s supposed to get, the taxpayer’s already paying more for it, and here you have an unengaged patient. So we’re demanding accountability that they have to start doing what is expected of them; and they should want to start doing what is expected of them. We are now studying what can we do when they don’t do what is expected of them."

Governor Haley elaborated on the importance of letting people know what they are doing, instead of just saying no to this "free money."

Many of the states, I mean in the next 3 or 4 years we have to be very careful, and what they are all focusing on is, 'Are you accepting ObamaCare?' or 'Are you expanding Medicaid?' We can’t just say no we’re not, we have to say what we are doing. These are the things South Carolina is doing to show that we are a state that is a can-do state; that we don’t need Washington telling us what to do, we will actually lead in the country on how we can better perform, giving every citizen in our state quality healthcare."

Next, the governor tackled the question of what not setting up a state exchange means for South Carolina. According to Obamacare, if a state refuses to set up the exchange, the federal government will set one up for them; the concern then becomes the potential increase in power the federal government might have in the state. Governor Haley remained firm, however, stating,

"I think that this was the biggest magic trick in the world, which was to say, “If you don’t set this up we’re going to do it for you,” because what we found out is they have no plan. When you go back and you throw it back in their face and say look, “You’re telling us what to do, you’re telling us how to do it and you’re telling us to pay for it when we don’t have the money to pay for it. No, if you think you can do this better, then you can do it.” Well the answer that we get back is they don’t have a plan, nor do they have the money to pay for it. So what my federal delegation has said is, and when I’ve spoke with Senator DeMint and Senator Graham and all of our Congressional members, they basically said, “Thank you, you just bought us two more years,” because we know they don’t have a plan for what they would do in these states. We also know the money is not there because they’re dealing with money problems now. So, you know, we cant’ let them bully their way into our state to tell us how we need to do things. We need to throw it back at them and say, “Look, you think you can do it better, fine you do it, but you’re going to pay for it.”

Since South Carolina has joined 9 other states in refusing to expand Medicaid, the state newspaper, The State, has claimed that those making less than $11,000 will fall through the cracks. I asked Governor Haley if the newspaper was correct and, if so, what should be done about the situation. In her response she noted that she is working closely with her director of Health and Human Services, Tony Keck to focus on expansion but with accountability.

"What we’re not going to be told is that we have to expand a certain number without making sure there is accountability tied to it. You can’t go and buy a product without knowing how you are going to pay for it two and three years down the road."

She explained further,

"We did this with the stimulus and we saw what happened to all those states that took it and all those states that basically had to go and pick themselves up, two and three years later; this is no different when you do that. We will expand based on what the needs of South Carolina are, not on the needs of Connecticut, not on the needs of Massachusetts, not on the needs of California, that is not our job. If you look at Connecticut and you look at California, I mean do you need any more examples of exactly why this isn’t going to work? So what we are saying is we have to stand up, we have to have a backbone and say, 'Look, you think you can make life better for the people of South Carolina, you try.' When they look at it, they know they can’t because they don’t know the people of South Carolina, they don’t know what our demographics are, they don’t know what our cultural and education issues are. The truth is these are cultural issues within our state where we have to go and engage with the public on how we can get them more informed and more engaged on how they wan’t to be healthy and why they want better outcomes, and then reward them for it. The rewards come in both ways, one - the taxpayers pay less for things like obesity and prostate cancer and two - they get healthier lives and become more productive; it’s a win-win."

In the final part of my interview with Governor Haley, she states her views on the gun control debate finding its way into healthcare law and the fight against Obamacare going forward.

The following information was already announced in January. Nikki Haley and Tony Keck are just repeating what has already happened. Beginning next year, Medicaid-designated rural hospitals in South Carolina will be fully compensated through the Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) program for their uncompensated care costs. In this news release it says the following - The DSH program is a taxpayer-supported $461 million Medicaid fund used to compensate hospitals in South Carolina for the unreimbursed costs of providing inpatient and outpatient hospital services to the uninsured and Medicaid eligible individuals. I guess in a around about way the DSH program IS a taxpayer supported program - It is a federally funded program.

Apparently Nikki Haley is accepting more federal funds than she wants anyone to know about. In news releases she is conveniently leaving out the fact that
many programs that she claims to be funding - is being funded with federal dollars.

Today is an important day - we're one giant step closer to reversing the government takeover of our health care.The deadline for states to begin setting up their own, state-run health care exchange under ObamaCare was today, December 14th. This deadline was a crucial trial for ObamaCare, and the verdict is in -- 26 states, a majority of the union, are currently declining to set up an exchange.Below is a map of how each state stands on the exchanges:

In one of the more infamous statements regarding the process in which Democrats sought to force-feed health care reform to the American people, former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi quipped, "We have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it".

Democracy and Power 112: Fidelity to LeadershipTo be elected, a politician must please his constituents. However, to be a powerful legislative force, a politician must be an obedient member of a party – Democrat or Republican. Since most constituents are busy making a living, raising families and focused on immediate community concerns, loyalty to the party most often prevails.

American Conservatives have been sounding the alarm about state run health care and what horrors await us in a government run health care plan for most of the last century. In fact, Ronald Reagan warned us what was to come several decades ago.

With 23 states (so far) refusing to set up health care exchanges to implement ObamaCare, the federal government is being forced to implement its own exchanges in these states instead. Since the ObamaCare law did not provide any funding to do this, observers have been wondering - "how are they going to pay for these exchanges?"Unsurprisingly, the answer is - wait for it - another new tax!

Some good news today, as Michigan and Arizona have both made decisions that they will not be setting up a health care exchange under ObamaCare.In Arizona, Governor Jan Brewer declared yesterday that she will not direct the state government to set up an exchange.

Use this page to find out where your state stands on the ObamaCare "exchange" - and to help us stand up to ObamaCare.Since the election, now fully two weeks ago, health policy experts such as our own Dean Clancy have been eagerly pointing out that those of us who believe in limited government still have a very real opportunity to halt one of the largest government intrusions of the past century - ObamaCare.