Hello and thank you for visiting AikiWeb, the
world's most active online Aikido community! This site is home to
over 22,000 aikido practitioners from around the world and covers a
wide range of aikido topics including techniques, philosophy, history,
humor, beginner issues, the marketplace, and more.

If you wish to join in the discussions or use the other advanced
features available, you will need to register first. Registration is
absolutely free and takes only a few minutes to complete so sign up today!

I find myself thinking this thread sounds increasingly like an argument between proponents of low and high church worship, with those championing the "trappings" of etiquette as necessary to true fulfillment while those of the low finding them often a barrier rather than an aid.

I'll happily put myself in the low church group as for me ritualised manners and behaviour often mask what I see as important, does your technique match your aims, both in effectiveness and harmony with the attack.

While I respect those who do follow tradition and use their aikido practice to provide a link with the past and the history from which aikido originated, I find the concept of no tradition = not aikido frankly insulting. For those who feel that way I do have one question. If, as we are reminded, O sensei wanted aikido to be available to everyone, do you really think imposing barriers of both language and behaviour beyond those need for safe practice really a good starting point?