tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8550962.post5795439529855604083..comments2016-12-06T03:20:31.133-08:00Comments on PyDev adventures: Pydev 1.3.23 and 1.3.24Fabio Zadroznyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04202246218394712738noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8550962.post-56819898401202395262008-11-17T02:54:00.000-08:002008-11-17T02:54:00.000-08:00Support for Python 2.6 and 3.0 should be added in ...Support for Python 2.6 and 3.0 should be added in the next release.<BR/><BR/>-- FabioFabio Zadroznyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04202246218394712738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8550962.post-9130942101036936682008-11-16T21:39:00.000-08:002008-11-16T21:39:00.000-08:00One more: Pydev doesn't recognize the Python 2.6 "...One more: Pydev doesn't recognize the Python 2.6 "class decorator" syntax. Any chance this could be added?chphillihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05755072772135183636noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8550962.post-88109971715317973422008-11-12T14:50:00.000-08:002008-11-12T14:50:00.000-08:00I'd love support for Python 2.6 use the "with" syn...I'd love support for Python 2.6 use the "with" syntax without required a "from __future__ import with_statement". As it stands, using "with" without the import breaks most of PyDev's features, since it sees a syntax error.chphillihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05755072772135183636noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8550962.post-16987369217808276292008-11-04T17:26:00.000-08:002008-11-04T17:26:00.000-08:00There are plans to support both (python 2.6 and py...There are plans to support both (python 2.6 and python 3), but in the current state of affairs, it should already be working (the grammar still recognizes print as a keyword, but print('foo') would already work, even though the grammar thinks it's a tuple, that should be no major hindrance on that).<BR/><BR/>So, aside from removing the 'print' from being highlighted and giving an error on the syntax when it's used in the '2.5 syntax', is there something else you think should deserve special support there?<BR/><BR/>-- FabioFabio Zadroznyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04202246218394712738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8550962.post-21957734818391110652008-11-03T12:42:00.000-08:002008-11-03T12:42:00.000-08:00Hi Fabio, Is there any plans to support python 2.6...Hi Fabio, <BR/><BR/>Is there any plans to support python 2.6 in the near future. Also what do you think about supporting for python 3?<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your excellent work. <BR/><BR/>BenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com