On October 30, 2001, President George W. Bush took the pitcher's mound at Yankee Stadium in the Bronx to throw out the first pitch of Game 3 of the World Series as the Yankees faced off against the Arizona Diamondbacks.

He delivered a strike.

To many, it was a sign that the country could start to heal from the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

That ball is among several items on display at the Flight 93 National Memorial Learning Center in Shanksville. It is part of a special exhibit titled: “Down but not out: Baseball after September 11, 2001.”

Nine undergraduates from Washington and Jefferson College curated the exhibit with the support of the National Park Service. It examines the role baseball has played in helping the nation cope during times of crisis.

“There's so much that baseball has in our culture, that we don't even realize it,” said Ryan Willen, 21, of Cleveland, one of the students who worked on the exhibit.

Included in the exhibit is a Hillerich and Bradsby Co. M1A1 carbine stock from World War II. Like many manufacturing companies during that period, Hillerich and Bradsby took a break from producing products like its Louisville Slugger baseball bats to help out with the war effort, Willen said.

The exhibit has camouflage jerseys worn by the Pirates to show support for the troops, as well as recordings of interviews with players and coaches when games resumed the week after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The collaboration between Washington and Jefferson College and the National Park Service was born of a former student's research paper, which examined why baseball was significant in the wake of Sept. 11, said David Kieran, assistant professor of history at the college in Washington, Pa.

Stephen Clark, superintendent of the National Park Service units of Western Pennsylvania, heard about the paper when Kieran brought students to visit the Flight 93 Memorial in 2016.

The idea stuck with Clark, so he pitched the idea for a student-curated exhibit to Kieran. From there, Kieran developed a course in Museum Exhibit Design and Installation, and Clark coordinated the budget and museum resources that students would need to research, curate and install an exhibit.

Though Katie Prinkey, 22, also of Cleveland, was a kid in 2001, she remembers an eerie silence as planes at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport were grounded.

Students just a year or two younger than her aren't likely to have any memory of the day, Prinkey said.

“We're probably going to be the last ones,” she said.

Aside from researching and acquiring artifacts for the exhibit, Kieran said one of the biggest challenges he faced as a professor was teaching students to examine a contemporary moment like Sept. 11 as a historical event — “To ask them to step back from their own lived experience and to study it the way we might study the Vietnam War or World War II or the Civil War as key moments in American culture,” he said.

Students such as Jonathan Cadez, 22, of Canonsburg reckoned with that challenge throughout the three-month-long project. He first encountered Sept. 11 in an academic setting two years ago, in a college course about terrorism, he said.

“I was able to grow up and not know so much stuff about the time when I was younger,” said Cadez, who was in charge of coordinating with the George W. Bush Presidential Center to borrow the first-pitch baseball for the exhibit.

“But I guess that must be the way people felt about the attack on Pearl Harbor, or the death of John F. Kennedy,” Cadez said.

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our
Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent
via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.