[Safety studies, if you
can find them, are from days to weeks (see), and done
by the makers where they only use Healthy babies,
Never unvaccinated controls and the disproven Antibody Theory.
They then get rubber stamped by the Industry controlled committees such as the
UK's JCVI, and the CDC's ACIP.
Any scrutiny is avoided by making the minutes and members secret
(1) (see also:
Study data kept
secret.) They are shielded from liability by the government which
takes away the main driver for safer vaccines 1.
Any vaccine found to be unsafer than usual, and withdrawn
in one country, can still be used in another for years (eg UrabeMMR), and then it's sold to third world countries which is where all the
mercury containing vaccines are going.]

"If Practices do not achieve good uptake of MMR at 2 years of age they risk
not qualifying for their DES 90% target payment, which is worth over £11k for a
national practice of 5,000 patient"

In an exclusive to scoop.co.nz,
Jonathan Eisen reveals that the now-famous"Norwegian
parent vaccine" from which the New Zealand meningococcal vaccinewas "derived" and which has been used to justify claims of "safety" and"efficacy"... was not even released in Norway, after scientists rejected
iton the ground that it was only marginally
effective, and that themeningitis epidemic in Norway
had tapered off without the vaccine. MENZbvaccine

"Clear and certain medical knowledge, namely that the
BCG-vaccine is not only ineffective but also harmful, was kept quiet for 27
years (in Germany) while the vaccine continued to be used and children were
being harmed by it....almost 500 (estimated) cases of vaccine damage per
year."--The Decline of Tuberculosis despite "protective" Vaccination
by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p119/117.

NAAR should know that I was on the WHO immunology panel for 20 yearsand continually urged discontinuation of thimersol in vaccines.The only ones who listened were the Scandinavian countries (esp.Finland, where I hold an honorary Ph.D.). Those countries banned
thimersolin 1992.-----H.
Hugh Fudenberg, M.D.

" Goldman also reports that shortly after communicating on authorshipissues with health officials associated with the Centers for DiseaseControl (CDC) concerning the shingles data and analysis, he was threatenedwith legal action if he published the manuscript in the medical literature.He said, "Whenever research data and information concerning potentialadverse effects associated with a vaccine used in a human population aresuppressed and/or misrepresented by health authorities, not only is thismost disturbing, it goes against all accepted scientific norms anddangerously compromises professional ethics.""ATA REVEALS THREAT OF
SHINGLES EPIDEMIC FROM VACCINE USE Health Officials
Threaten Legal Action Against Researcher

"DOCTORS have
been told to come clean about Infanrix, the safer whoopingcough jab available on the NHS - but only if directly challenged about itby parents. The compromise means that parents who ask no questions will
have theirchildren injected with the cheaper
DTwP jab laced with ethyl mercury - asubstance
ordered out of US medicine on health grounds."--Media
Feb 2003

"For decades, American pharmaceutical companies have known how
to produce the safer DPT vaccine but decided not to bring it to market because it would
increase production costs and lower the drug's 50% or higher profit margins."--Money Magazine

"Drug companies keep DTP alive because it is less-expensive to make, offers
a bigger profit margin and can be easily dumped on developing countries......Because many
pediatricians prefer to reduce office visits by giving the combined DTP-HiB shot and
because many HMOs use about 50 percent DTPH, as many as 30 percent of American infants
still get reactive whole-cell pertussis."--NVIC http://www.909shot.com/gnssafet.htm

"The British drug company Glaxo Wellcome allowed thousands
of British babies to be inoculated with toxic whooping cough vaccines it knew had not
passed crucial safety tests."--Media July 2001

"MERCURY, one of the most dangerous substances known toman, is being used in a series of infant vaccines - inspite of a warning from NHS advisers that its use as acheap preservative "may be toxic" to babies aged undersix months.....
"The very low thiomersal concentrations present in thepharmacological and biological products are relativelynon-toxic in adults," the UKMI report says. "But itmay be toxic in utero [in the foetus] and during thefirst six months of life." It is the first time any UK health official hasadmitted to the danger posed by mercury in vaccines.....The list includes four out of the seven flu vaccinesissued this year by the government, a pneumoniavaccine and four of the 11 child vaccines. The mainsource is the triple DTwP jab, for whole-celldiphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. "--Media
Jan 2003

"They say there is growing concern that a mercury
compound in the three-in-one DTP vaccine may cause autism and brain damage.
The vaccine, which protects against diphtheria,
tetanus and pertusis or whooping cough, is given to infants of eight weeks and
older. However, the Department of Health has
said there is no cause for concern and that the vaccine is safe for children...."--Media
Jan 2003

"Michigan had made too much DPT in its Lansing laboratory and wanted to
sell it to other states. That required FDA testing and approval, as with any other
manufacturer. However, the FDA denied approval and returned the vaccine, saying It was 300
percent too potent. State health officials disagreed and decided to test the vaccine on
children in Ingham County (Lansing). Despite more adverse reactions than usual, health
officials released 400,000 doses of the DPT vaccine for use throughout the state a month
later."---Fresno Bee DPT report 1984

"They began using MMR in April 1989 and by July doctors were already
warning of side-effects, but the government didnt take any notice because it was not
convenient for them. They kept using it for another 3 years, securing the profits for the
manufacturers".---Shunsuke Fuji

"Congress requires records to be kept of the lot numbers of vaccines for
which unusually large number of "adverse events" (side effects) are reported.
But the information is then simply ignored. The "hot lots," as they are
called, are not destroyed, but continue to be injected into infants and children.
(no use throwing out expensive vaccines--dollars are worth more than lives, just as in the
U.K.) "---Dr Rimland

"SENIOR
government advisers said as early as 1989 that vaccines could provide a
route by which BSE could be transferred to human beings."--Media
report

"Up to 300 cases relate to this brand of vaccine - Pluserix - which was
banned by the Department of Health in 1992 after being linked with meningitis. This was two
years after an identical vaccine was banned in Canada."--Media

"THE Department of Health has told doctors they must use
stocks of a mercury-based vaccine for infants even though it is being phased out
for safety reasons."--Media Aug 2001

"According to one memo, SV40 was found in three of 15 lots of the oral
vaccine seven months after the federal directive was issued in March 1961. Lederle
released the contaminated vaccine to the public anyway, the memo shows. The
documents also suggest that the company failed to test the monkey- kidney seed strains
used to make the bulk polio vaccine for contamination, despite a written warning from Dr.
Albert Sabin, who developed the oral vaccine."--Media

"In 1990, scientists from the Queens Medical Centre Nottingham found
some children developed a form of meningitis after receiving it. But despite this
the Government went on using it for more than two years. The Canadian
Government, also using the vaccine, immediately switched to a safer version. It was not
until September 1992 that the UK Department of Health issued pharmacists with emergency
supplies of a safer brand with instructions to withdraw existing batches."--Sunday Express

"The British drug company Glaxo Wellcome allowed
thousands of British babies to be inoculated (late 60's-early
70's) with toxic whooping cough vaccines it
knew had not passed crucial safety tests."--Media
July 2001

"The Prevnar pre-licensure clinical trials, which Wyeth Lederle paid Kaiser
Permanente to conduct, compared two experimental vaccines against each other. To compound
this basic methodological flaw, Kaiser and Wyeth Lederle, allowed most of the children in
the trial to be given the more reactive DPT vaccine rather than use the safer, less
reactive DTaP vaccine. This placed the children in that five-year experiment in greater
danger and allowed the drug company to write off the seizures that occurred as being
caused by DPT and not Prevnar, when in fact, they didn't know. Even so, the groups of
children who got Prevnar suffered more seizures, higher fevers, more irritability and
other reactions than did the children who got the other experimental vaccine. It was a
no-brainer as far as I was concerned: Kaiser and Wyeth Lederle had proved nothing about
Prevnar vaccine safety."--Barbara Loe Fisher

"The evaluation of safety and efficacy and federal approval of Prevnar is
laden with ethical questions. Many of the doctors directly involved in the testing and
approval process appear to have significant conflicts of interest. The efficacy of the
vaccine is questionable and safety testing has been terribly inadequate. There are no
long-term studies (i.e. more than 5 years) of the chronic, debilitating and life
threatening diseases that this vaccine may cause. The fact that the vaccine is
bio-engineered by combining various types and portions of bacteria should require it to
undergo considerable scrutiny. Assuming the vaccine has any efficacy at all, the need for
universal vaccination needs to be reexamined in light of the small number of children who
might be at risk from serious complications from pneumococcal disease. "---Michael Horwin, MA

"The anthrax vaccine was approved without every doing a controlled clinical
study. There is no long term safety data on the anthrax vaccine. The government
admitted this in congressional hearings. It is a distortion of the truth to say there
is substantial safety data."--Bart Classen

"Longest safety trial of of the triple vaccine (MMR, all live
attenuated viruses) was three weeks."--Dr
Fudenburg MD

"I have minutes from a CDC Study Group Meeting on the
Hepatitis B vaccine held in March, 1997. The minutes of the meeting show that it would
take at least a 60 day study to show the onset of MS. Clinical studies done by the two
manufacturers were four and five days in length, respectively. It should
be noted that the afternoon session of this meeting was chaired by Dr. Robert
Sharrar of Merck."--Betty D.
Fluck

Dr Dunbar found that the drug insert mentions that the
Hepatitis B vaccine was only monitored for five days for safety. The literature
shows plasma immune reactions happening weeks after the shot&endash;neurological,
rheumatoid, vascular, and skin. There is a criminal investigation in France
regarding the introduction of the vaccine prior to knowledge of reactions. Dr.
Dunbar has discussed the fact that the clinical trail data is not available to
researchers. The information of adverse reactions reported is not available and
the antigens are not available to scientists for research.[2002] AUTISM AND
IMMUNIZATIONS by Stephanie F. Cave, M.S., M.D.,
F.A.A.F.P.

"FDA virologist Peter Reeve........ acknowledged that the
FDA suspended
its own independent tests of vaccine purity 15 years ago, leaving it entirely up to the
manufacturers to ensure the vaccine is contaminant free."--'The Virus and the Vaccine': Atlantic Monthly http://www.whale.to/vaccines/sv409.html

"In addition, the U.S. Office of Technology, one of the few semi-reliable
agencies of the U.S. government, says there is no current system utilized by the
CDC to determine if the vaccines do work or how dangerous they really are."--Dr
Douglass M.D.

"Vaccine manufacturers and others are sheltered from product liability
lawsuits by a special 1986 act of Congress. (See the US Code 42 USC 300aa for details.) This act
set up a fund to compensate those who can prove serious injury from vaccines."--Roger Schlafly

"But instead of selling the safer Japanese (DPT)
vaccine, Warchafsky says, U.S. manufacturers asked Congress to limit
their liability for adverse reactions to any vaccine mandated by the government,
hinting they might stop producing children's vaccines without it. " ----Congressional Quarterly Researcher

4b Formulate a vaccine damage law (VICP) so it is very difficult to claim &
prove vaccine damage against the government

"And then the industry started buying up the experts,"
he contends, citing the example of James Cherry, a widely recognized pertussis expert who
has served on both the ACIP and the AAP's vaccine advisory committee."----Congressional Quarterly Researcher

"Several years ago, because of the
increasing amount of litigations over DTP, members of the so-called Red Book Committee of
the American Academy of Pediatrics agreed in a sense that we would sort of divide up the
cases to try to help the manufacturers in these lawsuits, and therefore I and a number of
my colleagues agreed to serve as expert witnesses."

"FDA virologist Peter Reeve........ acknowledged that the
FDA suspended
its own independent tests of vaccine purity 15 years ago, leaving it entirely up to the
manufacturers to ensure the vaccine is contaminant free."--'The Virus and the Vaccine': Atlantic Monthly http://www.whale.to/vaccines/sv409.html

"Since the 1920s, virtually all continuing medical and public
health education is funded by pharmaceutical companies. In fact, today, the FDA can't even
tell health scientists the truth about vaccine contaminants and their likely effects. The
agency is bound and gagged by proprietary laws and non-disclosure agreements forced upon
them by the pharmaceutical industry. Let us not forget that the pharmaceutical
industry, as a special interest group, is the number one contributor to politicians on
Capital Hill."--Leonard Horowitz

"Since vaccine development information is considered proprietary (protected
by nondisclosure policies) government officials and researchers must shield
potential safety issues from public scrutiny. This censorship is rationalized by
the all too persuasive argument that vaccines cannot be criticized lest the public become
non-compliant in taking them. Finally, this silence is buttressed by the small number of
people capable of critically evaluating vaccine manufacturing and safety testing
procedures. In essence, health care professionals and the general public know little about
the possible dangers of live viral vaccines."--Dr Martin

"Using kids as guinea pigs in potentially harmful vaccine experiments is
every parents' worst nightmare. This actually happened in 1989-1991 when Kaiser Permanente
of Southern California and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) jointly conducted a
measles vaccine experiment. Without proper parental disclosure, the Yugoslavian-made
"high titre" Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine was tested on 1,500 poor,
primarily black and Latino, inner city children in Los Angeles. Highly
recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), the high-potency
experimental vaccine was previously injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, and Africa. It
was discontinued in these countries when it was discovered that the children were dying in
large numbers."--Dr Alan Cantwell MD

"To determine the effect of different amounts of the vaccines, researchers
at the hospital inoculated newborns from mostly lower-income black families with doses
ranging up to more than 100 times the dose recommended for adults."--Media

On september 14, 1992 two measles vaccines (Pluserix & Immravax) were banned in the UK after it
was revealed that children had developed meningitis. On Sept 16, 1992 the New
Zealand government withdrew Pluserix

2002:"Officers are also investigating how a consignment of potentially
dangerous mumps vaccine was sent to one of Direct Health 2000's suppliers. The vaccine
sent by a German distributor turned out to be of the Urabe strain, banned in Britain since
1992 as it can cause viral meningitis in babies. "--Media
2002

"The Medicines
and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency found from information that had been
in its possession for more than a decade that high doses of the anti-depressant
can lead to aggression and thoughts of suicide.But
instead of revealing the truth to the 17,000 people taking high doses and the
other half-million Britons on a safer dose, the MHRA sat on its findings.Astonishingly, I was actually threatened with legal action by Professor
Kent Woods, chief executive of the MHRA, if I revealed this."---RICHARD
BROOK

In the same year, the Washington Post (3) published the fact
that Ritalinwhich is prescribed to very young
children had never been tested on thatage group
(under 6's) and yet, between 150,000 - 200,000 children betweenthe ages of 2 and 4 were prescribed Ritalin. Hilary Butler letter to BMJ 2004