I had to bump this thread, because someone on here wanted an answer from me in supporting my information.

The information I posted in another thread about a new investigation into WTC 7 is in the works, we are all going to wait to see the new Peer Reviewed
Report that is going to come out this Spring 2017.

Can you give the context of the picture, evidence who took the image, where the image was captured, when the image was taken, prove the image is
authentic and not manipulated, where the image was uploaded from.

How was the pretty light found. Digging by hand? Why would two workers just end up standing around looking at the pretty light and not try to
extinguish the pretty light if it was impeding their cleanup of the debris. Unless they are the ones cutting the steel during cleanup?

Can you give the context of the picture, evidence who took the image, where the image was captured, when the image was taken, prove the image is
authentic and not manipulated, where the image was uploaded from.

As I said on the previous page (33): "Doctored? BBC using AP image?" The link to the BBC article containing the image is there as well. Go take a
look.

Here is the area of the image in question scaled up. I don't see evidence of a thermal lance going from the man squatting to the fiery hole, nor do I
think that his body or pixelation would be able to obscure a thermal lance because the required area of travel for said lance is entirely in
view.

Scaled up even more.

It don't rule out the thermal lance explanation, however, because it looks like a hose for a thermal lance may be run behind the two workers. I really
am not that interested in this aspect of 9/11 anymore because it has recently become clear to me that the apparently insurmountable issues regarding
9/11 truth are the control of information and the conditioning of the public mind.

What is wrong with you? The link is on page 33. From my above post "As I said on the previous page (33): "Doctored? BBC using AP image?"
The link to the BBC article containing the image is there as well. Go take a look.""

Again: "As I said on the previous page (33): "Doctored? BBC using AP image?" The link to the BBC article containing the image is there as
well. Go take a look. The link to the BBC article containing the image is there as well. Go take a look.""

Maybe you are on too many different threads. Go read our prior exchanges in this thread. I am not going to continually re-argue the same points with
you, especially if you are going to read my responses so carelessly. You are being rather inconsiderate by doing so.

And indeed there are many smoking guns. For example, poorly trained pilots carrying out the elaborate battle plan on 9/11 while pushing the airliners
at or beyond their design envelopes executing highly proficient maneuvers that would challenge the most experienced pilots is simply not credible and
has been challenged as such by dozens of expert military and civilian aviators, many with thousands of hours experience in the very same type of
airliners. And yet this is what the 911 Commission, and you apparently as one of their apologists, would have us believe.

Look, my friend, I have been fine tuning my bs detector for many decades now, and looking on in disbelief as 9/11 provided the justification and cover
for the destructive transformation of America. The government's story is a dog that don't hunt on virtually every level at which sober scrutiny is
applied, requiring countless incredible coincidences, one-off, precedent busting near or actual physical impossibilities, the destruction of or
outright denial of physical and massive eyewitness evidence and testimony, the co-opting and hijacking of the so-called investigations by non-neutral
parties, the aggressive fostering of a new and un-american nationalist faith rendering any questioning of government fabrications heresy, and the
outright, Orwellian suspension of common sense and critical thinking by the once contentious media.

Believe the stinking pile of fetid compost that has been offered up in lieu of truth if that is your inexplicable (perhaps) desire and inclination,
outlined with chapter names, headings, sub-headings, and sub-sub-headings prior to even the first meeting of the Zelikrock Commission. I will do no
such thing and will continue to follow the evidence, the relevant expert testimony, and my own experience and carefully considered analysis, no matter
how ridiculed, disturbing, painful, or unpopular.

Where in this article, news.bbc.co.uk... does it mention molten metal. The caption states workers cleaning
wreckage. That usually involves cutting steel. Prove otherwise.

The image was provided in response to Pilgrum's claim that "Evidence of molten metal 'long after collapses' seems to be founded purely on doctored
photographs..." Considering that the photograph is from the BBC, I think it is unlikely to have been doctored. I see no evidence of cutting devices in
the image, and I seriously doubt if there was any activity of that type going on that the two workers pictured would be standing in such close
proximity to it.

The image is titled "Investigations began as the wreckage was cleared," not, as you claim "workers cleaning wreckage."

Why did you mischaracterize the title of the photo, neutronflux?

So are these two workers actually investigators inspecting a suspicious, very hot and glowing area on what looks to be a large girder, or is this
simply part of the debris removal process being depicted? I'm not sure.

Underground fires raged for months. O'Toole remembers in February seeing a crane lift a steel beam vertically from deep within the catacombs
of Ground Zero. "It was dripping from the molten steel," he
said.

New York City Department of Sanitation spokeswoman Kathy Dawkins: “Once the area was cleaned, normal commercial trash collections resumed by
the haulers that are licensed and regulated by the Trade Waste Commissioner,” Dawkins says. But for about two and a half months after the attacks,
in addition to its regular duties, NYDS played a major role in debris removal — everything from molten steel beams to human remains — running
trucks back and forth between Ground Zero and Fresh Kills landfill, which was reopened to accommodate the
debris.

And where in the article does it discuss molten metal? Molten metal found? The glow is the result of workers using thermal lances during clean up.
How in the heck is metal hot enough to be molten hanging there and not melting its way down? A little logic please.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.