Sunday, May 26, 2013

It's been a crazy couple of weeks. We've managed to finish all our academic studies for this school year, and we also attended our local Classical Conversations 3-Day Parent Practicum where the kids got to enjoy three crazy days in GeoDrawing camp while I attended general sessions in the morning and Essentials training in the afternoon.

Even though this was our third full year of homeschooling, it was our first year of official reporting since my son was in first grade. At the end of the year, Georgia statutes require that I write up a summary of his academic studies and progress - and as I sat down to do that, I decided I'd like to give him a standardized test just to get an idea of how he's doing compared to other kids his age. Christian Liberty Press offers the California Achievement Test (1970 version) online for $25, so that's what we did this afternoon.

It provides immediate results, and I'm feeling very gratified about my decision to homeschool after seeing these:

SUBJECT

Raw Score

Grade Equivalent

Percentile Rank

Stanine

Reading Vocabulary

85

2.9

82

7

Reading Comprehension

21

3.6

93

8

Mathematics Computation

40

3.4

97

9

Mathematics Concepts & Problems

43

3.4

90

8

Language Auding

14

5.5

98

9

Language Mechanics

28

3.0

83

7

Language Usage & Structure

18

5.1

95

8

Language Spelling

16

3.3

92

8

Explanation of the California Achievement Test Scores

Several
different numbers are listed on your California Achievement Test
results. Most of these are calculated based on a norm group (the
original group of students tested on which the test is standardized).
Results are listed by academic area. Below are basic definitions for
these test scores.

Raw ScoresRaw
scores are the actual number of correct answers within a given test
section, and are used to calculate the Grade Equivalent, Percentile, and
Stanine results. They should not be used for any kind of comparison or
statistical calculation since each test section varies in the difficulty
and number of questions.

Grade Equivalent ScoresGrade
equivalent scores represent the grade level (year and month separated
by a decimal point) of a student's ability compared to the median score
of students at the same academic level. Scores that are above a
student's grade level do not by themselves indicate proficiency to skip
to the next grade level in the particular academic areas. These scores
more likely show an understanding of only some of the concepts of that
higher grade. Conversely, scores below a student's grade level may
indicate a gap of understanding in those academic areas. Scores equal to
a student's grade level are considered the minimum for grade level
ability.

Percentile ScoresPercentile
scores are equivalent to the percentage of students from the norm group
who received lower scores than the student. For example, a student with
a percentile score of 73 means that the student did better than
approximately 73% of the students in the norm group. Percentile scores
do not represent the number of questions answered correctly.
Percentiles are useful for comparing a student's performance over
several sections of the test. However, because they are not measured on
an equal scale of units, they are not suitable for most statistical
calculations.

Stanine ScoresDerived
from the term STAndard score from a NINE-unit scale, stanines are based
on the mean of the norm group (who are given the score of 5) and a
standard deviation of 2.0. Scores are determined by the amount of
standard deviation from the norm group, in approximately one-half
standard deviation increments. The following table lists the meaning of each score:

9 Highest Level

6 Slightly Above Average

3 Well Below Average

8 High Level

5 Average

2 Low Level

7 Well Above Average

4 Slightly Below Average

1 Lowest Level

Stanine
scores are useful in calculating means, correlation coefficients, and
other statistics which are meaningful to test evaluators.

My son has no previous experience with standardized tests, and he doesn't get any computer time per se so I sat with him while he did the test, but I tried my best not to prompt him at all. I did have to explain that it's a timed test, so if he's not sure how to answer a question he should move on and come back to that one later; and also that if the answer he thinks is correct isn't one of the four offered, then he needs to select another answer. Overall he did very well - I did find some weak spots (namely, he doesn't know the value of currency even though we did touch on that this year), and I think he would have done a little better if he'd paid more attention to detail - but I'm happy about these results overall.At the risk of sounding like an intellectual snob, both my husband and I are pretty intelligent people, and we both did well in school (and on standardized tests) so I knew the kids would likely be smart too - but it's still gratifying to have some hard evidence to back up my assumptions!

Monday, May 13, 2013

I haven't given much though to the Common Core, because realistically it isn't likely to affect my children (unless major changes are made to standardized tests, and even then not really - I'm only required to have my children tested every three years beginning in third grade, and the results remain private unless we are audited for some reason). But I've heard so many different things, both good and bad, that I started doing a little homework.

At first, I thought Common Core was an excellent idea - without doing much research, I drank the Kool-aid and bought into the concept of national standards of excellence that would improve American students' understanding of math and language arts. However, seeing more and more negative press, I began to wonder how sound these standards really are. In particular, this article in the National Review scared the daylights out of me - or it would have, if I had a child in public (or private!) school.

The final page of that article summarizes the concerns about Common Core as follows (emphasis is mine):

They are not internationally
benchmarked. In fact, for math in particular, they are exactly contrary
to the kind of national standards used in high-performing countries.

The two major experts on content who were on the Validation Committee
reviewing the standards backed out and repudiated them when they saw
what the standards actually are.

State legislatures and parents were cut out of the loop in evaluating
the standards themselves or the cost of implementing them.

The Common Core standards are owned by private trade organizations, which parents cannot influence.

If that doesn't scare you, then you're far readier than I am to cede control of your children's education to anyone who touts him- or herself as an "expert". I'm incredibly thankful to be homeschooling my children and able to pursue the kind of Classical curriculum that I know will give them an enviable education in the long run!

I've found the link for the white paper referenced in the article, and I plan to read it this evening (assuming I survive our first swim team practice, the last PSR class of the school year, and the kids' Taekwondo belt test with enough brain cells intact) so I can become even more knowledgeable. It's frightening how smoothly Common Core was sold to the American public, and I hope it's not too late for them to see they've gotten a raw deal!

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

For those of you who might not be as geeky as I am, The Mary Sue is an amazing website that bills itself as "A Guide To Girl Geek Culture". It's choc full of things that warm my geek-girl heart on a daily basis, and when they asked for readers to submit pictures from Free Comic Book Day, I sent in the pictures I posted in the last entry - and we made the cut!

Click here to share my pride, and see my kids' picture on The Mary Sue!

And now back to our regularly scheduled programing...which is to say, I need to stop wasting time on the internet and go school my children. We're on track to wrap up the school year by the last week of May, and I don't want to get behind!

Saturday, May 4, 2013

What better way to spend a rainy Saturday than at our local comic book store? I like to share my geekiness with the kids by taking them to Free Comic Book Day every year!

This year, it was even better because it fell on May the 4th - Star Wars Day - so there were plenty of people in Star Wars costumes at the shop. David loves all things Star Wars, and Sophie knows a lot about it just by spending so much time around her brother's obsession, so they were more than happy to pose for pictures with the characters we encountered.

We picked up our free comics and a few other things, then had lunch with some friends - and now we're home reading the free comics! David chose a Star Wars/Avatar double comic, plus ones featuring Spongebob and the Smurfs; Sophie picked a Tinkerbell comic, one with the Tick and a third with the Incredible Hulk. I'm a proud geek mommy today (and every day - but I love seeing my kids enjoy geeky things too)!

Thursday, May 2, 2013

...and this is exactly why I'm a terrible blogger. I get busy and the idea of blogging just slips my mind! Oh well, it's not like I'm trying to make a living out of this or anything, it's just a form of expression for me.

It's been a busy week, but then it's nearly always a busy week around this house! Tuesday night R & I got to see an early preview of Iron Man 3. It was great fun! Best of all, our friend J. offered to babysit for us (for free!) so we didn't spend much money at all, though we did grab dinner afterwards. It was a lovely mid-week date night.

This weekend I'm hoping to make it to the Renaissance Festival, though it's looking like it might rain. We'll also be frantically practicing piano - the kids have a recital next week, and they're not quite ready. I'm also starting obedience school on Sunday evening with Duchess, our six-month-old Great Dane puppy. She deserves an entry of her own, she's quite an interesting story!

If anyone should happen to be reading this, I hope you have a wonderful weekend!

Saturday, April 27, 2013

I have tried this blogging thing before, but never with much success. This time I'm going at it with a new attitude - it's a place for me to write about all the things that are important to me, not just homeschooling or geekery or any other single subject. Anyhow, this is a repost of an entry I wrote last year on my old blog - it sums up how I feel about Classical Conversations, and perceived persecution of a sort from my local Catholic homeschool community.

I was going to write about our summer curriculum today, but I feel the
need to get back to why I started this blog. I'm part of a local
Catholic homeschool yahoo group; even though I haven't met many of the
women on the boards, I get the posts in digest form in my email every
day. Even though I personally know at least seven Catholic families in
our area who participate in Classical Conversations, the moderators of
the board are convinced that the organization is somehow anti-Catholic
and will not allow us to post announcements about CC or attend the local
Catholic homeschool conference as a vendor. (Seriously - we offered to
pay for a table last year so we could present our materials to the
Catholic community, and they flat out refused us saying they only permit
Catholic or secular vendors.)

This is incredibly frustrating to me, as I love the Roman Catholic
Church and I also love CC. I completely understand wanting to support
Catholic companies such as Classically Catholic and Catholic Schoolhouse, but the truth is that CC is a wonderful organization. I
have heard that, in some parts of the country, Catholic families have
been made to feel unwelcome in CC communities, but that is not a mandate
from CC corporate; Leigh Bortins herself states that she welcomes all
orthodox Christians, including Roman Catholics and Greek Orthodox.

Classical Conversations does not teach religion. The company's motto is
"To know God and make Him known," and that Christian spirit is evident
in the communities - but there is no doctrinal teaching in the
curriculum. Instead, the focus is on teaching children using the
classical method by focusing on history, geography, math, science,
English grammar, and Latin. There is Bible memorization - for Cycle 3,
we memorized John 1:1-7 in English and Latin, and for Cycle 1, we memorized Exodus 20:1-17 (the Ten Commandments) - but there is no
discussion of theology. Even in the Challenge program, students are
told that their parents are the spiritual head of the home and doctrinal
questions should be discussed with them rather than decided by the
tutor.

And yes, I know there is a timeline card that references the
Reformation. You know what? That's something that really happened, and
we need to discuss it with our children. Maybe I have a different
perspective on it because I was not born into a Catholic family - I
began considering the Catholic faith when I was in college, and finally
completed the RCIA process just six years ago when I was pregnant with
Sophie - but I don't see a problem with discussing controversial topics
with my children. I can answer any questions they have with confidence
and teach them how to answer their friends who may challenge them in a
respectful and educated manner.

I suppose it comes down to this: I do not plan to raise my children in a
Catholic bubble. That is not why I chose to homeschool. I feel called
to homeschool because I truly believe I can provide my children with a
significantly better education at home than they would get in a public
school setting, and I also appreciate that they are being spared the
relentless peer pressure that abounds even in private school settings. I
want my children to know there are other world views out there, and
still understand the sacredness of our Catholic traditions.

I chose Classical Conversations after much research, and I stand by that
decision. I chose to become a part of a new CC community rather than
starting up a Catholic Schoolhouse community or creating a Classically
Catholic co-op because I have seen CC in action and I love it. I do not
believe that I am somehow violating my Catholic conscience by
participating in CC.

I just wish I could make the leaders of the Yahoo group understand
that. Let Catholic families make the choice for themselves; talk to
those of us in the local community who participate in CC, and don't just
mandate that it's anti-Catholic and therefore should not be afforded
the same privileges that Catholic and secular homeschool vendors receive

To understand my crazy life, you need to meet my family - my amazing
husband Rob, and our two children, David (age 6) and Sophie (age 5). I
don't know how I ended up here - when I was younger, I never thought I
would get married, much less end up a stay-at-home, homeschooling mom -
but I'm happier than I ever imagined I would be!

We live in the
suburbs of Atlanta, GA, where Rob and I moved twelve years ago from
Miami, FL. I was born in the VA suburbs of Washington DC, but my family
moved to Miami when I was ten so that's really home to me. Rob was
born in the Panama Canal Zone, but grew up in Puerto Rico before joining
the Navy and finally ending up in Miami. We love our life in Georgia -
though the spring pollen is currently killing me...

About Me

Growing up, I never felt like I really fit in - but now I've come to see that as an asset rather than a flaw. I am difficult to define, because I have a wide variety of interests and hobbies. I'm a daughter, a sister, a wife, a mother, a friend; I'm a homeschooling Catholic housewife, but in my free time I ride motorcycles, read everything from Great Books to Chick Lit to modern sci-fi/fantasy novels, play tabletop RPGs (and occasionally video games) with friends, and watch a wide variety of television shows and movies. (I'm on a Doctor Who kick right now; before that it was The Walking Dead, and I love pretty much anything Joss Whedon has ever done.) I wish I was cool enough to write for GeekMom.com, but at the same time I want to be taken seriously as a Classical Catholic homeschooler. I am tremendously cynical when it comes to politics, and my views in that arena are primarily Libertarian.