I
hope that everyone had a chance to read the Prison Commission's entire
report. While none of it is news to the UNION people who contributed
to the research, and who lived the nightmare, the fact that it is agreed upon by law enforcement
professionals means that it just might have some impact. As long
as law enforcement owns the majority
of politicians and the "public demand" isn't strong enough to get these things done, reform cannot take
place. You are the public who must make these demands and get out
the vote for lawmakers who are really
going to represent you.

Your ability to work toward organizing
is the key to whether or not these reforms can take place. Without tightly organized voting groups
that outnumber those of law enforcement, not that difficult to do when everyone contributes time and
money, there is no representation for the prisoners and their families. Those connected to prisoners
outnumber everyone now, but whether they want to give up their chains is
a question that remains to be
demonstrated. All those UNION members who submitted their case
histories and chronologies to this endeavor
PLEASE pat yourself on the back.

I thank the members of the Commission
who have read the UNION newsletter for a little more than a
year now and I am very happy with
your work and your recommendations which is very much in line with what
I have been saying for the past
decade.

Ultimately the demand must come
from enough of us who will take action and nobody can do that for us. We are the rescuers that we've
been praying for, as the future hinges on the size and financial ability
of our own voting group.
Don't forget to write into editors who ran articles about this important
report. This is a good one to print off and
send to the prisoners so they can see some hope and realize what some of their families did here to help
them.

B. Cayenne Bird

Summary of Findings and
Recommendations

What happens inside jails and
prisons does not stay inside jails and prisons. it comes home with prisoners after they are released and
with corrections officers at the end of each day's shift. When people live
and work in facilities that are
unsafe, unhealthy, unproductive, or inhumane, they carry the effects home
with them. We must create safe and
productive conditions of confinement not only because it is the right thing to do, but because it influences
the safety, health, and prosperity of us all.

The daily count of prisoners
in the United States has surpassed 2.2 million. Over the course of a year,
13.5 million people spend time in
jail or prison, and 95 percent of them eventually return to our communities. Approximately 750,000 men and
women work in U.S. correctional facilities as line officers or other staff. The United States spends more
than 60 billion dollars annually on corrections. Many of those who are incarcerated come from and return
to poor African-American and Latino neighborhoods, and the stability of those communities has an
effect on the health and safety of whole cities and states. If there was
ever a time when the public consequences
of confinement did not matter, that time is long gone.

Some of the people confined in
our jails and prisons have committed serious and violent crimes. We can legitimately deprive them of
liberty, but we cannot allow anyone who is incarcerated to be victimized
by other prisoners, abused by officers,
or neglected by doctors. We must remember that our prisons and jails are part of the justice
system, not apart from it.

There are nearly 5,000 adult
prisons and jails in the United States—no two exactly alike. Some of them
are unraveling or barely surviving,
while others are succeeding and working in the public's interest. To succeed, jail and prison administrators
everywhere must confront prisoner rape, gang violence, the use of excessive force by officers,
contagious diseases, a lack of reliable data, and a host of other problems.

Solving these problems takes
dedication and dollars. But there is no reason why health and safety should be limited to only some correctional
facilities and no reason why even the best institutions cannot make a larger contribution to public
safety and public health. The findings and recommendations outlined below, and explored in detail throughout
the pages of this report, address the most pressing problems facing corrections today and the reforms
that can and must occur.

There is disturbing evidence
of individual assaults and patterns of violence in some U.S. prisons and
jails. Corrections officers told the
Commission about a near-constant fear of being assaulted. Formerprisoners recounted gang violence,
rape, beatings by officers, and in one large jail, a pattern of illegal
and humiliating strip-searches.
Former Florida Warden Ron McAndrew described small groups of officers operating as "goon squads" to
abuse prisoners and intimidate other staff. And in February, 2006, while
the Commission was gathered in Los
Angeles for a final hearing, more than a thousand prisoners were attacking each other in the
Los Angeles County jails, days of violence that the press described as
riots. At that hearing, California corrections
Secretary Roderick Hickman told the Commission: "Quite frankly, no one denies that violence occurs
in prisons and jails in this country."

Finding: We know which conditions
in correctional facilities fuel violence and, therefore, how to prevent violence.

Violence and abuse are not inevitable.
Every correctional facility can provide a safe environment for prisoners and staff. As Donald
Specter, director of the Prison Law Office in California, told the Commission: "Prisons don't have
to be as dangerous and as violent as they are. The culture of our prisons virtually dictates the level
of violence that you will have in them. And if you change that culture,
you will reduce the violence."

The majority of prisons and many
jails hold more people than they can deal with safely and effectively, creating a degree of disorder
and tension almost certain to erupt into violence. Similarly, few conditions compromise safety more than
idleness. But because lawmakers have reduced funding for programming, prisoners today are largely
inactive and unproductive. Highly structured programs are proven to reduce misconduct in correctional facilities
and also to lower recidivism rates after release. Results from a Zogby International poll released
in April, 2006, show the public's support for protecting public safety
through better programming: 87 percent
of Americans favor rehabilitative services for prisoners as opposed to punishment only.

Decisions about where to house
prisoners and how to supervise them also have an enormous impact on safety. A well-developed system
to objectively classify prisoners by risk reduces violence among them.
So does an approach to supervision
in which officers are engaging with prisoners throughout the day. Yet the best classification and supervision
systems still are not commonplace around the country.

Teaching and modeling non-forceful
ways for officers to resolve conflict is crucial because the unnecessary or excessive use
of force and weapons provokes broader violence. Such guidance is especially important given the
increasing use of pepper spray, TASER guns, and other weapons that can cause serious injuries if used
excessively. Former general counsel of the Texas prison system, Steve Martin, told the Commission
that these weapons are often used as a "first strike" response, before
other tactics are considered or attempted.

Finally, the ties with family
and community that former prisoners depend on after release also promote safety during incarceration.
Unfortunately, the distance between home and the correctional facility—and
a culture in some facilities that
does not welcome visitors—makes it hard to maintain those ties. There are even barriers to maintaining
contact by phone when the cost of receiving a collect call from someone
in prison—much higher than in the
free world—operates like a tax on poor families.prevent violence: recommendations1.
Reduce crowding. States and localities must commit to eliminating the crowded conditions that
exist in many of the country's prisons and jails and work with corrections administrators to set and meet
reasonable limits on the number of prisoners that facilities can safely house.

2. Promote productivity and rehabilitation.
Invest in programs that are proven to reduce violence and to change behavior over the long
term.

4. Use force and non-lethal weaponry
only as a last resort. Dramatically reduce the use of non-lethal weapons, restraints, and physical
force by using non-forceful responses whenever possible, restricting the use of weaponry to qualified
staff, and eliminating the use of restraints except when necessary to prevent serious injury to self
or others.

5. Employ surveillance technology.
Make good use of recording surveillance cameras to monitor the correctional environment.

6. Support community and family
bonds. Reexamine where prisons are located and where prisoners are assigned, encourage visitation,
and implement phone call reform.c ommission on safety and abuse
in america ' s prisons

Finding: We need more reliable
measures of violence behind bars than we have today.

Data about deadly violence show
decreasing rates nationally of homicide and suicide, but we do not have equally reliable data about
the much larger universe of non-lethal violence. There are prisons and
jails that are not collecting or reporting
information about assaults: For example, Arkansas, North Dakota, and South Dakota each reported zero
assaults among prisoners statewide in the year 2000. In-depth studies suggest that actual levels of
violence among prisoners are at least five times higher than what even
the best administrative records
capture. Equally troubling, we have no national measures of non-lethal physical violence perpetrated
by staff against prisoners, despite widespread agreement that excessive use of force happens. Chief
statistician for the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics Allen Beck told
the Commission, "I cannot measure
well the level of assaults using administrative records as they exist today."

1.2. medical careFinding: High rates of disease
and illness among prisoners, coupled with inadequate funding for correctional health care, endanger
prisoners, staff, and the public.

Much of the public dismisses
jails and prisons as sealed institutions, where what happens inside remains inside. In the context of disease
and illness, which travel naturally from one environment to another, that view is clearly wrong. Left
untreated, staph infections and diseases such as tuberculosis, hepatitis
C, and HIV directly affect our families,
neighborhoods, and communities.

As a result of poverty, substance
abuse, and years of poor health care, prisoners as a group are much less healthy than average Americans.
Every year, more than 1.5 million people are released from jail and prison carrying a life-threatening
contagious disease. At least 350,000 prisoners have a serious mental illness. Protecting public health
and public safety, reducing human suffering, and limiting the financial
cost of untreated illness depends
on adequately funded, good quality correctional health care.

Unfortunately, most correctional
systems are set up to fail. They have to care for a sick population on shoestring budgets and with
little support from community health-care providers and public health authorities. Capturing the degree
of failure in California, Dr. Joe Goldenson told the Commission, "There are facilities with four or
five thousand people that only have two or three doctors." Around the country, some physicians are operating
on a license that restricts their work to correctional facilities because
they are deemed not qualified to
provide care in the community. The public has yet to face the broad and
long-term costs of these kinds of
failures.

Finding: Medical neglect and
the spread of infectious disease are not inevitable; there are solutions
to the health-care dilemmas facing
corrections.

Correctional facilities have
a tremendous opportunity to provide health care to people in jail and prison that also protects the public
health. But corrections cannot do this alone. Lawmakers must provide adequatefunding, and health-care providers
from the community must get involved. Together, they can recruit qualified and caring medical staff who
are able to manage contagious and costly diseases. Proper screening and
treatmentof infectious diseases in correctional
facilities makes a difference: Between 1992 and 1998, New York City reduced tuberculosis cases citywide
by 59 percent, and drug-resistant cases by 91 percent, through this kind
of partnership.

Improving correctional health
care requires more than partnerships. Many short-term cost-saving measures imposed by local, state,
and federal legislatures have long-term negative consequences. To drive down the costs, legislators
pressure corrections administrators to require prisoners to make co-payments for their medical care.
While co-payments seem reasonable on the surface, they cost more in the long run by discouraging
sick prisoners from seeking care early on, when treatment is less expensive and more effective and before
disease spreads.

Equally troubling, misguided
federal law deprives correctional systems of desperately needed Medicaid and Medicare dollars to fund
decent health care. Many people in prison and jail qualify for these federal benefits and lose them when
they are incarcerated. Just like any other community health-care provider, correctional agencies should
be reimbursed for the cost of providing health services to people who are Medicaid and Medicare eligible.
Finally, along with committing more funds to care for mentally ill prisoners, states and counties need to
expand treatment in the community. Our jails and prisons should not function as mental institutions.

Provide health care that protects
everyone: recommendations:

1. Partner with health providers
from the community. Departments of corrections and health providers from the community should join
together in the common project of delivering high-quality health care that protects prisoners and the public.

2. Build real partnerships within
facilities. Corrections administrators and officers must develop collaborative working relationships
with those who provide health care to prisoners.

3. Commit to caring for persons
with mental illness. Legislators and executive branch officials, including corrections administrators,
need to commit adequate resources to identify and treat mentally ill prisoners and, simultaneously, to reduce
the number of people with mental illness in prisons and jails.

4. Screen, test, and treat for
infectious disease. Every U.S. prison and jail should screen, test, and
treat for infectious diseases under the
oversight of public health authorities and in compliance with national guidelines and ensure continuity
of care upon release.

5. End co-payments for medical
care. State legislatures should revoke existing laws that authorize prisoner co-payments for medical
care.

6. Extend Medicaid and Medicare
to eligible prisoners. Congress should change the Medicaid and Medicare rules so that correctional
facilities can receive federal funds to help cover the costs of providing health care to eligible prisoners.
Until Congress acts, states should ensure that benefits are available to people immediately upon release.

Summary Of Findings And Recommendations

1.3. segregation

Finding: The increasing use of
high-security segregation is counter-productive, often causing violence inside facilities and contributing
to recidivism after release.

Separating dangerous or vulnerable
individuals from the general prison population is part of running a safe correctional facility.
In some systems around the country, however, the drive for safety, coupled
with public demand for tough punishment,
has had perverse effects: Prisoners who should be housed at safe distances from particular individuals
or groups of prisoners end up locked in their cells 23 hours a day, every day, with little opportunity
to be productive and prepare for release.

People who pose no real threat
to anyone and also those who are mentally ill are languishing for months or years in high-security units
and "supermax" prisons. In some places, the environment is so severe that people end up completely isolated,
confined in constantly bright or constantly dim spaces without any meaningful human contact—torturous
conditions that are proven to cause mental deterioration.

Prisoners often are released
directly
from solitary confinement and other high-security units directly to the streets, despite the clear
dangers of doing so.

Between 1995 and 2000, the growth
rate in the number of people housed in segregation far outpaced the growth rate of the prison population
overall: 40 percent compared to 28 percent. As lawyer, scholar, and prison monitor Fred Cohen told
the Commission, segregation is now a "regular part of the rhythm of prison life." There is troubling evidence
that the distress of living and working in this environment actually causes violence between staff and prisoners.
And the consequences are broaderthan that: Housing a prisoner
in segregation can be twice as costly as other forms of confinement, and
the misuse of segregation works
against the process of rehabilitating people, thereby threatening public safety.

Limit Segregation: Recommendations

1. Make segregation a last resort
and a more productive form of confinement, and stop releasing people directly from segregation to
the streets. Tighten admissions criteria and safely transition people out
of segregation as soon as possible.
And go further: To the extent that safety allows, give prisoners in segregation opportunities to
fully engage in treatment, work, study, and other productive activities,
and to feel part of a community.

2. End conditions of isolation.
Ensure that segregated prisoners have regular and meaningful human contact and are free from extreme
physical conditions that cause lasting harm.

3. Protect mentally ill prisoners.
Prisoners with a mental illness that would make them particularly vulnerable to conditions in
segregation must be housed in secure therapeutic units. Facilities need rigorous screening and assessment
tools to ensure the proper treatment of prisoners who are both mentally ill and difficult to
control.c ommission on safety and abuse
in america ' s prisons

II. Labor and Leadership

Finding: Better safety inside
prisons and jails depends on changing the institutional culture, which
cannot be accomplished without enhancing
the corrections profession at all levels.

Most corrections professionals
work under extremely difficult circumstances to maintain safety and help prisoners improve their lives.
But because the exercise of power is a defining characteristic of correctional facilities, there
is constant potential for abuse.

In the worst cases, the institutional
culture can devolve into one where, in the words of prison chaplain Sister Antonia Maguire, prisoners
are treated like "animals, without souls, who deserve whatever they get."

Cultivating a positive culture
inside our correctional facilities is more than a "feel good" idea. As
former Minnesota Warden James Bruton
wrote, "Security and control—given necessities in a prison environment—only become a reality
when dignity and respect are inherent in the process."

Today there are efforts to improve
the underlying culture of prisons and jails in places as far apart as Oregon, Arizona, Massachusetts,
and Maryland. Corrections administrators leading those reforms understand that an "us versus
them" mentality endangers prisoners and staff and, over time, harms the families and communities to
which prisoners and staff belong. "We're moving away from having that feeling of being safe when offenders
are all locked up, to one where we're actually safer because we have inmates out of their cells,
involved in something hopeful and productive," explained Mary Livers, Maryland's deputy secretary
for operations.

Efforts at culture change cannot
succeed and bear fruit, however, without recruiting and retaining a highly qualified officer corps and
great corrections leaders. All too often, that is not the case. The rate
of turnover among officers averages
16 percent annually—and is higher where the pay is lower. Directors of systems remain on the job for
no more than three years on average, and their rapid turnover destabilizes entire systems.

State and local governments must
improve pay for officers and find other ways to develop the labor force at all levels. Training for
officers must improve so that they are better prepared to interact effectively
with prisoners from diverse backgrounds.
The skills and capacities of lieutenants, captains, and wardens—staff who have the greatest
influence on the culture of prisons and jails day to day—must be developed. And governors and local officials
must hire the best qualified professionals to lead correctional systems and give them the freedom and
resources to do the job well.

Change the culture and enhancethe
profession: recommendations

1. Promote a culture of mutual
respect. Create a positive culture in jails and prisons grounded in an
ethic of respectful behavior and interpersonal
communication that benefits prisoners and staff.

2. Recruit and retain a qualified
corps of officers. Enact changes at the state and local levels to advance the recruitment and retention
of a high quality, diverse workforce and otherwise further the professionalism of the workforce.

3. Support today's leaders and
cultivate the next generation. Governors and local executives must hire
the most qualified leaders and support
them politically and professionally, and corrections administrators must, in turn, use their positions
to promote healthy and safe prisons and jails. Equally important, we must develop the skills and capacities
of middle-level managers, who play a large role in running safe facilities and are poised to become the
next generation of senior leaders.

III. Oversight and AccountabilityFinding: Most correctional facilities
are surrounded by more than physical walls; they are walled off from external monitoring and public
scrutiny to a degree inconsistent with the responsibility of public institutions.

Summary Of Findings And Recommendations

All public institutions, from
hospitals to schools, need and benefit from strong oversight. Citizens
demand it because they understand what
is at stake if these institutions fail. Prisons and jails should be no exception. They are directly
responsible for the health and safety of millions of people every year,
and what happens in correctional
facilities has a significant impact on the health and safety of our communities.

Corrections leaders work hard
to oversee their own institutions and hold themselves accountable, but their vital efforts are not
sufficient and cannot substitute for external forms of oversight. Former Oklahoma Warden Jack Cowley
cautioned, "When we are not held accountable, the culture inside the prisons becomes a place that
is so foreign to the culture of the real world that we develop our own
way of doing things." Or as U.S. Department
of Justice Inspector General Glenn Fine, who oversees all federal prisons, told the Commission,
"There is tremendous pressure within an institution to keep quiet." Despite increased professionalism within
the field of corrections, there remains resistance to scrutiny by "outsiders" that must be overcome.

The most important mechanism
for overseeing corrections is independent inspection and monitoring. Every U.S. prison and jail should
be monitored by an independent government body, sufficiently empowered and funded to regularly
inspect conditions of confinement and report findings to lawmakers and the public. Today, this
is the case in only a few states and localities.

While independence is a crucial
feature, the relationship with corrections should be collaborative: insiders and outsiders working together
to ensure safe and effective facilities.

The federal courts also have
an important role to play. Federal civil rights litigation ushered in life-saving reforms over the past 30 years.
Several misguided provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act enacted in 1996 must be changed so that
the federal courts can deliver justice to individual prisoners who are victims of rape, excessive use
of force, and gross medical neglect, and compel reform in facilities where prisoners and staff are in danger.
Equally important, the U.S. Department of Justice must step up efforts
to monitor correctional facilities
and, when appropriate, bring civil or criminal actions in response to abusive conditions. States should develop
similar capacities. Finally, every prison and jail should allow the press
to do its job; invite lawmakers,
judges, and citizens to visit facilities; and work in other ways to inform
the public about life behind bars.

Finding: Internal oversight and
accountability is no less crucial than monitoring from the outside. We
need to strengthen the mechanisms
that exist and make more use of them.

The American Correctional Association
(ACA) has developed a solid set of standards governing all aspects of correctional operations
and provides a process whereby facilities can become accredited by complying with the standards.
Yet today only a tiny fraction of the nation's jails and fewer than half
of America's prisons are accredited.

Every prison and jail should
be accredited, and the ACA should raise some standards—pushing institutions to excel beyond
acceptable practice to good practice—and continue to strengthen the accreditation process.

Internal oversight also depends
on listening to those who are incarcerated and to the officers who work the tiers and pods. No director,
warden,or shift commander alone can know all he or she needs to know. In many correctional facilities,
there are inadequate, sometimes wholly meaningless, systems for receiving and responding to
prisoners'grievances and reports by staff about misconduct, and there are failures to safeguard from retaliation
those who speak out. Corrections administrators must encourage prisoners and staff to voice
their concerns and then protect them.

IV. Knowledge and Data

Finding: Uniform nationwide reporting
on safety and abuse in correctional facilities is essential. Incomplete and unreliable information
currently hampers the ability of corrections leaders, legislators, and the public to make sound
decisions about prisons and jails.

All correctional facilities should
be required to record and report to the federal government essential information about safety and
health inside facilities. The data we have today is incomplete and unreliable in ways that make it impossible
to get a complete picture of safety and abuse in correctional facilities, compare levels of safety in
systems and facilities across the country, or dependably track trends over time within a single state or
local system.

There must be public demand for
more and better information about the health and safety of our correctional facilities. Without
it corrections administrators cannot make the best management decisions, legislators cannot
make the best policy decisions, and the public has no way to judge whether those decisions protect or hurt
the community.

The federal Bureau of Justice
Statistics, the Association of State Correctional Administrators, and others are working to standardize the
data collection process. Congress should pass legislation that builds on those efforts by funding uniform,
nationwide reporting, and state legislatures should mandate compliance with the national reporting
requirements.

Congress also should enact legislation
that provides incentives for states to track the success of former prisoners, using the most sophisticated
measures, and then analyze the outcomes alongside conditions of confinement, including levels
of violence. This is a tremendously difficult task, but it is work that policymakers should embrace
as it will contribute directly to public safety.

Finally, we cannot hold corrections
administrators accountable for the safety of prisoners and staff, and for public safety, if we do
not provide the resources necessary to effectively manage their facilities.
Every criminal statute, every sentencing
policy, and every policy related to probation and parole has consequences for the conditions
inside our prisons and jails and for the health of communities. Legislators should be required
to confront the potential consequences of the laws they are considering and publish impact statements
before voting.

Increase oversight and accountability:
recommendations

1. Demand independent oversight.
Every state should create an independent agency to monitor prisons and jails.

2. Build national non-governmental
oversight. Create a national non-governmental organization capable of inspecting prisons and jails
at the invitation of corrections administrators.

3. Reinvigorate investigation
and enforcement. Expand the investigation and enforcement activities of
the U.S. Department of Justice and
build similar capacity in the states.

4. Increase access to the courts
by reforming the PLRA. Congress should narrow the scope of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

5. Monitor practice not just
policy. Ensure that American Correctional Association accreditation more accurately reflects practice
as well as policy.

6. Strengthen professional standards.
Improve and support American Correctional Association standards.

7. Develop meaningful internal
complaint systems. Corrections managers should strengthen the systems that allow them to listen to
those who live and work in prisons and jails.

8. Encourage visits to facilities.
Create opportunities for individual citizens and organized groups, including judges and lawmakers, to visit
facilities.

9. Strive for transparency. Ensure
media access to facilities, to prisoners, and to correctional data.c ommission on safety and abuse
in america ' s prisons

In Conclusion

We all bear responsibility for
creating correctional institutions that are safe, humane, and productive.
With so much at stake for our citizens'
health and safety, with so many people directly affected by the conditions in our prisons and
jails, this is the moment to confront confinement in the United States.

Improve Knowledge And Data: Recommendations

1. Develop nationwide reporting.
Federal legislation should support meaningful data collection, and states and localities should fully
commit to this project.

2. Fund a national effort to
learn how prisons and jails can make a larger contribution to public safety.
The federal government and states
should invest in developing knowledge about the link between safe, well-run correctional facilities
and public safety.

3. Require correctional impact
statements. The federal government and states should mandate that an impact statement accompany all
proposed legislation that would change the size, demographics, or other pertinent characteristics of
prison and jail populations.

This morning there are at least
95 articles at www.google.com (click on news tab and enter prison, California) along the same lines
as the three below. Those people who answered my call to open up
your lives last year and submit
a chronology to this Commission are not mentioned in these articles except
as part of the permanent, recorded
results.

But the results are the most
important part and this international hard-hitting exposure of inhumane prison conditions would not
have been possible without you. The mentally ill are suffering the
worst of the abuses and you can write about
that in your ten sentence letters to editors but overall the press coverage does a fantastic job.
I thank the journalists who have followed with us via this newsletter for
the past seven years and brought out
our other stories as well.

There must be millions of dollars
in media time and space about your suffering. When we started the UNION in 1998, only three or
four newspapers carried an occasional story. Had everyone related to a prisoner gotten together and
raised money, we could have purchased this exposure before the election but it's all still good.

Those prison guards who have
tortured my son, Nora's son and others, called us liars and tried to prevent this type of news coverage from
ever being exposed to the public, the Department of Corrections who named us by numbers (instead
of our names) when 40 of us begged for those in ad segs and SHUs to be released are unveiled.

Without the intelligence, risk-taking
courage of the UNION people who took the time to tell the details of their own suffering, the world
would never know about the oppression under which we live, or about the absolute hell we've endured
for the past fifteen years, all of it for no reason. All of
this inhumanity, none of it a solution to crime.

I thank everyone who responded
to this call to action to participate and today, I am very relieved that
we have this much news coverage
about torture in America, but especially in California's prisons.

I am issuing another call to
action for us to protest in Sacramento to draw attention to and object
to the appropriation of $600 million
with which to build bogus mental hospitals which will be nothing but ad
seg and SHU units. We certainly
need such facilities but completely outside of the control of CDC.
Please give me a date Mon. through Thurs
when you can bring ten people to back me up at a protest in
Sacramento. The other citizen's groups outside
of prison reform are out doing protests at the Capitol right now, so we need at least 500 committed
before I call it as small protests do not count.

My calls to action have always
resulted in positive results, not as quickly as we would like, but if we
listed out every win we've had since
1998 by taking group action, the results are impressive and indisputable. This type of press coverage
tells the voters they are wasting tax dollars and at risk of a system that chews up lives. It is worth
far more than purchased advertising because the truth rings through in
every article I've read so far.

I am very proud of you for what
you did here, and grateful to the National Prison Commission for
this work and for listening and for caring.
The politicians know of the suffering and dying but make no effort to respond to individual complaints
and that is why we must continue to fight until our screams are not only heard but acted upon.

Give me a count - you writers
and protesters who are heard today far and wide. Thank God for the
people of the UNION who have carried
everyone in these battles. This is a big one that you who participated caused to happen for the good
of every prisoner and their family in the nation.

Good luck came through discipline
and your action. If you didn't participate when I called
to you, it is possible you are a part of the
problem instead of the solution. I'm too happy over this today to
scold the list sitters, but reform comes
much faster when more participate.B. Cayenne Bird

The U.S. spends more than any
other nation -- $60 billion a year -- to house inmates, but sees little
good as a result, a bipartisan panel
says.

By Jenifer Warren, Times Staff
WriterJune 8, 2006

SACRAMENTO — Americans spend
$60 billion a year to imprison 2.2 million people — exceeding any other nation — but receive a dismal
return on the investment, according to a report to be released today by
a commission urging greater public
scrutiny of what goes on behind bars.

The report, "Confronting Confinement,"
says legislators have passed get-tough laws that have packed the nation's jails and prisons to
overflowing with convicts, most of them poor and uneducated. However, politicians have done little
to help inmates emerge as better citizens upon release.

The consequences of that failure
include financial strain on states, public health threats from parolees with communicable diseases,
and a cycle of crime and victimization driven by a recidivism rate of more than 60%, the report says.

"If these were public schools
or publicly traded corporations, we'd shut them down," said Alexander Busansky, executive director
of the Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons, established by a private think tank in New
York. Rather, the commission said, Americans view prisons with detachment or futility, growing
interested when a riot makes the news and then looking away, "hoping the troubles inside the walls will
not affect us."

With 20 members representing
diverse perspectives, the bipartisan panel urges Americans to ignore the costs of incarceration no longer.
Launched in early 2005 amid what panelists called "accumulating doubts about the effectiveness and
morality of our country's approach to confinement," the commission will deliver its findings to a Senate
subcommittee in Washington today.

Crowding is one cause, with most
lockups so packed that they feature a "degree of disorder and tension almost certain to erupt in violence."

Idleness also compromises safety.
"But because lawmakers have reduced funding for programming, prisoners today are largely
inactive and unproductive."

Family ties — another proven
factor in promoting safety and successful paroles — are strained by prisons' location in remote
areas and by a culture that does not welcome visitors. There are even barriers to receiving phone calls, with
the cost of a collect call from prison far higher than what is charged
in the free world, amounting to "a
tax on poor families."

• High rates of disease
in prison, coupled with inadequate funding for healthcare, endanger inmates,
staff and the public, with staph infections,
tuberculosis, hepatitis C and AIDS among the biggest threats.

In California, healthcare has
been deemed so bad — claiming one inmate life in an average week through incompetence or neglect — that
a federal judge seized control of prison medical care from the state and recently handed it to a receiver.

• The rising use of high-security
segregation units is counterproductive, often causing violence inside prisons and contributing to
recidivism.

Although designed to isolate
the most dangerous inmates, segregation units increasingly house those who may appear unmanageable
but who pose no danger to others or are mentally ill. Prisoners are often released from solitary confinement
— where they experience extreme isolation from human contact for long periods — directly to the
streets, despite the proven risk of doing so.

The commission recommends more
rigorous screening, an end to conditions of severe isolation and proper treatment for the mentally
ill.

• Prison culture — the
"us-versus-them" mentality — endangers inmates and staff and harms the
families and communities to which convicts
return. Many states are pursuing a new approach, which the commission called more than
a "feel-good idea."

"Security and control — necessities
in the prison environment — only become a reality when dignity and respect are inherent in the
process," said former Minnesota Warden James H. Bruton, one of scores who provided testimony. Change will
require recruitment and retention of high-quality officers and leaders,
so the field — which employs 750,000
people — is not viewed as one of "knuckle-draggers in dungeons."

In California, the Office of
the Inspector General acts as a watchdog, investigating reports of abuse, assaults and fatalities. But
the media are limited in their access to the state's 33 prisons, and legislative efforts to overturn such restrictions
have been vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and his predecessor, Gray Davis.

The commission includes members
who run correctional systems and attorneys for inmates, as well as lawmakers and others from the
criminal justice field. The panel spent a year exploring problems — the first comprehensive, national
effort of its kind in three decades.

Its co-chairmen are former U.S.
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge John J. Gibbons and former U.S. Atty. Gen. Nicholas deB. Katzenbach.

State Sen. Gloria Romero (D-Los
Angeles) also served on the panel, which was staffed and funded through the Vera Institute of Justice.

All 20 members supported the
report's findings, concluding that "we should be astonished by the size
of the prisoner population, troubled
by the disproportionate incarceration of African Americans and Latinos, and saddened by the waste of
human potential."

The report can be found at http://www.prisoncommission.org
.------------------------respond to the above article
letters@latimes.com-----------------------http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/14768433.htm

SACRAMENTO - Abuse and neglect
in California prisons is so bad that it has brought condemnation from national experts and forced
a federal judge to seize control of inmate health care.

Now a federal commission says
in a 126-page report made available in advance to the Associated Press that similar problems exist
in many prisons and jails across the nation.

California has become known as
a national leader in areas such as environmental protection and energy efficiency. In this case, it's
leading by bad example, said state Sen. Gloria Romero, D-Los Angeles, a member of the national Commission
on Safety and Abuse In America's Prisons.

The first national prison commission
in three decades is presenting its findings and recommendations today to the U.S. Senate Judiciary
subcommittee on corrections and rehabilitation in Washington, D.C.Also today, federal judges from
Sacramento and San Francisco will hold an unusual hearing in the state capital to consider expanding
federal control of inmates' medical treatment to cover mental health care.

The review stems from an ongoing
dispute between a non-profit inmate rights group that filed class-action lawsuits against state officials
over how the prison system should operate. The suit was settled shortly after it was filed in 2001,
but the two sides have been sparring since over implementing the details.Problems that have made headlines
in California echo in other lockups for 2.2 million inmates nationwide, the commission said in its report.
They include:

• Medical care so poor that inmates
often die of neglect.

• A ``code of silence'' that
protects wrongdoers while punishing whistle-blowers.• Crowding and underfunding
that leaves inmates with living space the size of a twin bed.

• An emphasis on punishment,
including mentally damaging periods of isolation, instead of on programs that could help convicts prepare
for a return to society.

``If you want to know anything
that's wrong with prisons, come to California,'' said Romero, the Senate majority leader who has held
many hearings into prison problems. ``How not to run a prison -- that's
what California has been about for
decades.''

Elaine Jennings, representative
for the newly renamed California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, said the department
is making progress but the national report shows the challenges it faces.

The adult and juvenile prison
systems were combined nearly a year ago to give top corrections administrators more control
over individual prisons and allow better coordination. Jennings said there
is better security, separation
of inmates, and employee discipline than before.

New interim Corrections Secretary
James Tilton promises to restore education and vocational programs that failed under his two predecessors.

The commission's findings that
more prison rehabilitation was needed found an unusual ally in Chuck Alexander, executive vice president
of the California Correctional Peace Officers Association.

``We're going to have `rehabilitation'
stenciled on our badges, but that's as far as it got. The educational and vocational programs have
been virtually shut down,'' Alexander said.

Such programs are needed to keep
ex-convicts from quickly returning to prison, he said.

Far from locking society's problems
safely behind bars, poor treatment virtually guarantees that most inmates will eventually get
out and cause more harm, the national commission said.

``It's based on a false premise
that you lock people away and they somehow get rehabilitated. And they really don't get rehabilitated
at all,'' Romero said. ``Seven of 10 parolees will come back, most after committing new crimes.''-------------------------------------------respond to this one letters@mercurynews.com--------------------------------http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.prisons08jun08,0,4350855.story?coll=bal-local-headlines

U.S. prisons called risk to livesReport lists overcrowding, few
constructive activities as conditions that cause inmate violenceBy Greg Garlandsun reporterOriginally published June 8,
2006

Overcrowding, cruel conditions
and a lack of constructive activities for inmates fuel violence in America's prisons and threaten public
safety because most inmates return to their communities ill-prepared for
daily life, according to a report
to be presented to Congress today.

"Few conditions compromise safety
more than idleness," says the report by the Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons,
a nonpartisan group that has studied conditions inside the nation's correctional facilities for
the past year. "But because lawmakers have reduced funding for programming, prisoners today are largely
inactive and unproductive. Highly structured programs are proven to reduce misconduct in correctional facilities
and also to lower recidivism rates after release."

The report highlights issues
that have emerged in Maryland as state officials struggle to control prison violence that records show has
turned increasingly deadly in recent years.

"It sort of validates what we've
been saying," said Frank C. Sizer Jr., the state's prison chief. "You can't continue to lock people up and
not do anything with them and put them back into society with no tools
to be able to cope."

Some correctional officers have
been critical of Sizer and his boss, Public Safety and Correctional Services Secretary Mary Ann
Saar, for focusing what they say is too much of their attention on inmate rehabilitation. They say it
has come at the expense of safety and security of prison staff.

"There is a balance between security
and treatment," Sizer said. "A good treatment program only serves to improve safety and security."

The report being released today
is the product of a yearlong study by a 20-member commission that held hearings around the country
and was staffed by the New York-based Vera Institute of Justice, a nonprofit group that researches criminal
justice issues. The commission was co-chaired by former U.S. Attorney General Nicholas de B. Katzenbach
and John J. Gibbons, former chief judge of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The report says there is far
too much violence in America's prisons and cites "other serious problems that put lives at risk and cause
immeasurable suffering."

The problems include "too many
facilities that are crowded to the breaking point, too little medical and mental health care, unnecessary
uses of solitary confinement and other forms of segregation, a desperate need for the kinds
of productive activities that discourage violence and make rehabilitation possible, and a culture in many
prisons and jails that pits staff against prisoners and management against staff."

Among other things, the commission
recommended that policymakers eliminate crowded conditions at prisons and jails, invest in
programs proven to reduce violence and change behavior in the long term
and substantially reduce the use
of physical force in dealing with the inmate population.

"The majority of prisons and
many jails hold more people than they can deal with safely and effectively, creating a degree of disorder
and tension almost certain to erupt into violence," the report says.

The country spends about $60
billion a year on corrections, said Alexander Busansky of the Vera Institute. He said 2.2 million people are
in prison or jail. Maryland operates 27 jails and prisons that house about 27,000 inmates at any given
time, according to state corrections officials.

Maryland prisons and jails, like
many others around the country, have long suffered from overcrowding, state officials say.

The problems are particularly
severe at two state-run facilities in Baltimore, the Central Booking and Intake Facility and the Baltimore
City Detention Center. Both have a history of violent incidents.

The report says a variety of
factors fuel violence.

Besides overcrowding, unnecessary
or excessive use of force can provoke broader violence, the report says. And the increasing use
of high-security segregation at prisons "is counterproductive, often causing violence inside facilities and
contributing to recidivism after release."

An inmate placed in segregation
is kept locked in an isolation cell for 23 hours a day, sometimes for months at a time and often with
little human contact, the report notes.

The commission also called for
a change in federal rules to shift health care costs for eligible prison inmates to Medicaid and Medicare
programs, which would ease some of the burden on the states.Maryland Deputy Secretary of
Public Safety and Correctional Services Mary L. Livers, who testified before the commission, said the report
should lead to positive discussion about changes that are badly needed
in the field of corrections.

She said it is "vitally important
to staff safety and to inmate safety" for inmates to be involved in productive activities while they are incarcerated.

Livers said administrators have
been trying to move Maryland's correctional system more in that direction, calling it "a major
culture shift" from the way business has been done in the past.