Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

Re: Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

If normal contrails can't form clouds, then how do you think natural clouds form?

Quoting: The Guy

This ^

None of you chemtrail believers will answer this simple question? Why?

Quoting: Menow 1394150

Menow/Guy this question about normal contrails forming clouds, etc. was addressed in the video. As I have and many others here have mentioned before this is a discussion topic and we are not professing to be atmospheric scientist like some of you profess to be.

We're here to discuss what could be and at this point most likely is going on. The informational material listed here is very helpful as well as a lot of other useful resources we use.

We are not obligated to prove anything to any of you who wish to believe otherwise. So, you can bully all you want to no avail.

Watch the documentary! You might learn something.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

Maybe Minnow should go to Contard Science and do a refresher course...

Re: Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

...

So you imagine that all of the scientific knowledge about cloud formation is inaccurate or a "falsehood"? After all, the absolute foundation of "chemtrail" beliefs is that there is no such thing as persistent contrails. THAT notion is the falsehood being perpetrated on the public.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

There are those of us who don't think visible persistence is a perquisite for an Intentional Covert Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program (ICAAIP) to exist . . .

Quoting: George B

I realize that. However, that doesn't change what I said. 99% of chemtrail believers think that persistence is THE proof that a line in the sky is a 'chemtrail'.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

POLL: Do you believe in Chemtrails?Yes, and they are all over the sky . . . 36.7% (945)No, I do not . . . 23.4% (603)Yes, the TPTB is trying to crowd control, and other agendas 18.1% (466)Yes, they include cloud seeding, Chaff, insecticides, etc. 10.3% (265)Yes, but most are persistent trails from High Efficiency Jet Engines 6.0% (155)Yes, but they are rare . . . experimental geo-engineering, etc. 5.5% (143)Blank (View Results) (465)

Re: Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

If normal contrails can't form clouds, then how do you think natural clouds form?

Quoting: The Guy

This ^

None of you chemtrail believers will answer this simple question? Why?

Quoting: Menow 1394150

Menow/Guy this question about normal contrails forming clouds, etc. was addressed in the video. As I have and many others here have mentioned before this is a discussion topic and we are not professing to be atmospheric scientist like some of you profess to be.

We're here to discuss what could be and at this point most likely is going on. The informational material listed here is very helpful as well as a lot of other useful resources we use.

We are not obligated to prove anything to any of you who wish to believe otherwise. So, you can bully all you want to no avail.

Watch the documentary! You might learn something.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

Maybe Minnow should go to Contard Science and do a refresher course...:banana2:

Re: Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

Watch the documentary! You might learn something.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

I started watching it. Couldn't stand more than a few minutes of the delusional fantasizing.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

And there is the problem. You don't want to believe so now you have become pointless for further conversation.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990

"Want to believe"?? Is this a religion? If I listen to something and what I hear doesn't make any sense... yes, I rationally choose not to "believe" it. Now, how is that a "problem", exactly?

Go tell your boss that the chemtards are not buying it today and don't really give a shit.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990

So If I listen to something and it doesn't make any sense, that can only be because I have "boss" telling me what to think and say? Seriously? ]

In the vid, the guy is showing his home video and freaking out over everything he sees in the sky- He appears to have little reasoning ability- just paranoid over-reaction. Sorry, but that is not something/someone I choose to "believe".

Re: Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

Watch the documentary! You might learn something.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

I started watching it. Couldn't stand more than a few minutes of the delusional fantasizing.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

And there is the problem. You don't want to believe so now you have become pointless for further conversation.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990

"Want to believe"?? Is this a religion? If I listen to something and what I hear doesn't make any sense... yes, I rationally choose not to "believe" it. Now, how is that a "problem", exactly?

Go tell your boss that the chemtards are not buying it today and don't really give a shit.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990

So If I listen to something and it doesn't make any sense, that can only be because I have "boss" telling me what to think and say? Seriously? ]

In the vid, the guy is showing his home video and freaking out over everything he sees in the sky- He appears to have little reasoning ability- just paranoid over-reaction. Sorry, but that is not something/someone I choose to "believe".

Clearly shown at 1:50 of that vid, claiming to show "chemtrails" being "sprayed" from an EasyJet airliner, it shows a contrail materializing well behind the engines- not being "sprayed" from the engines. Why the gap?

Why show something which proves you wrong? I guess you just don't know any better.

Re: Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

...

There are those of us who don't think visible persistence is a perquisite for an Intentional Covert Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program (ICAAIP) to exist . . .

Quoting: George B

I realize that. However, that doesn't change what I said. 99% of chemtrail believers think that persistence is THE proof that a line in the sky is a 'chemtrail'.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

POLL: Do you believe in Chemtrails?Yes, and they are all over the sky . . . 36.7% (945)No, I do not . . . 23.4% (603)Yes, the TPTB is trying to crowd control, and other agendas 18.1% (466)Yes, they include cloud seeding, Chaff, insecticides, etc. 10.3% (265)Yes, but most are persistent trails from High Efficiency Jet Engines 6.0% (155)Yes, but they are rare . . . experimental geo-engineering, etc. 5.5% (143)Blank (View Results) (465)

Clearly shown at 1:50 of that vid, claiming to show "chemtrails" being "sprayed" from an EasyJet airliner, it shows a contrail materializing well behind the engines- not being "sprayed" from the engines. Why the gap?

Why show something which proves you wrong? I guess you just don't know any better.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

There are loads of articles and videos in that thread, but the only thing that's quoted time after time is: Contrails disappear in 20-30 seconds, and that is an undeniable fact.

Well, for your information it says: Contrails disappear in 5-30 seconds, and that is an undeniable fact.

I saw a contrail today - 29-08-2012 - that took 22 seconds to disappear, and I suppose it could take a little longer sometimes.

Re: Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

If normal contrails can't form clouds, then how do you think natural clouds form?

Quoting: The Guy

This ^

None of you chemtrail believers will answer this simple question? Why?

Quoting: Menow 1394150

Menow/Guy this question about normal contrails forming clouds, etc. was addressed in the video.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

Then you should have no trouble answering the question. Why hasn't anyone?

As I have and many others here have mentioned before this is a discussion topic and we are not professing to be atmospheric scientist like some of you profess to be.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

Yes, this a discussion topic. There is plenty of info available on cloud formation and such has been posted on about every thread on this topic. Can't any of you absorb any of it?

We're here to discuss what could be and at this point most likely is going on.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

Why doesn't that include scientific data on normal cloud formation?

The informational material listed here is very helpful as well as a lot of other useful resources we use.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

But not readily available science on normal cloud formation?

We are not obligated to prove anything to any of you who wish to believe otherwise.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

Believe otherwise than what? Is this sort of thread about belief or information?

So, you can bully all you want to no avail.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

Asking an obvious and relevant question is "bullying"?

Watch the documentary! You might learn something.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1611462

Study some atmospheric science. You might learn something.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

Menow, do you have a reading comprehension problem? You took a lot of time and pains for something you do not even believe in to make this silly post.

You decided not to finish watching the documentary. You made your judgement that it wasn't for you. Well, I directed you there to get answers to your questions from a professional. Someone better qualified to give concise, accurate information.

Why are you still here if you don't believe in Chem Trails?!

However, if you still need professional help, I saw one posted for you by 990 that should be pretty simple to understand.

Don't know what else to tell you lady. Read the post of mine that you dissected a few more times.....maybe it will come to you.

Clearly shown at 1:50 of that vid, claiming to show "chemtrails" being "sprayed" from an EasyJet airliner, it shows a contrail materializing well behind the engines- not being "sprayed" from the engines. Why the gap?

Why show something which proves you wrong? I guess you just don't know any better.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

There are loads of articles and videos in that thread, but the only thing that's quoted time after time is: Contrails disappear in 20-30 seconds, and that is an undeniable fact.

Well, for your information it says: Contrails disappear in 5-30 seconds, and that is an undeniable fact.

I saw a contrail today - 29-08-2012 - that took 22 seconds to disappear, and I suppose it could take a little longer sometimes.

So 5-30 seconds is a reasonable estimate.

Quoting: RoXY

Yeah, 5-30 seconds is reasonable. I've seen those all my life.

It's those long drawn out persistent ones I question. Especially when you see them down low in all kinds of weather conditions on a frequent basis and they spread out to make clouds.

I saw my first rainbow trail last week on the way to the ocean. (Had to throw that in here...but, it's true, pretty but strange).

Clearly shown at 1:50 of that vid, claiming to show "chemtrails" being "sprayed" from an EasyJet airliner, it shows a contrail materializing well behind the engines- not being "sprayed" from the engines. Why the gap?

Why show something which proves you wrong? I guess you just don't know any better.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

There are loads of articles and videos in that thread, but the only thing that's quoted time after time is: Contrails disappear in 20-30 seconds, and that is an undeniable fact.

Well, for your information it says: Contrails disappear in 5-30 seconds, and that is an undeniable fact.

I saw a contrail today - 29-08-2012 - that took 22 seconds to disappear, and I suppose it could take a little longer sometimes.

So 5-30 seconds is a reasonable estimate.

Quoting: RoXY

Yeah, 5-30 seconds is reasonable. I've seen those all my life.

It's those long drawn out persistent ones I question. Especially when you see them down low in all kinds of weather conditions on a frequent basis and they spread out to make clouds.

I saw my first rainbow trail last week on the way to the ocean. (Had to throw that in here...but, it's true, pretty but strange).

Clearly shown at 1:50 of that vid, claiming to show "chemtrails" being "sprayed" from an EasyJet airliner, it shows a contrail materializing well behind the engines- not being "sprayed" from the engines. Why the gap?

Why show something which proves you wrong? I guess you just don't know any better.

Quoting: Menow 18943200

There are loads of articles and videos in that thread, but the only thing that's quoted time after time is: Contrails disappear in 20-30 seconds, and that is an undeniable fact.

Quoting: RoXY

The ONLY thing? What about this: Clearly shown at 1:50 of that vid, claiming to show "chemtrails" being "sprayed" from an EasyJet airliner, it shows a contrail materializing well behind the engines- not being "sprayed" from the engines. Why the gap?

Well, for your information it says: Contrails disappear in 5-30 seconds, and that is an undeniable fact.

I saw a contrail today - 29-08-2012 - that took 22 seconds to disappear, and I suppose it could take a little longer sometimes.

So 5-30 seconds is a reasonable estimate.

Quoting: RoXY

You saw *A* contrail(or even several) dissipate within 30 seconds and conclude that *ALL* contrails should do the same. Seriously?? I'll resist the temptation to call you what you are. It starts with an "I".