Why: To grab the weekend headlines and pile the pressure on the Rt Hon Owen Paterson MP, Secretary of State for Environment and Rural Affairs, ahead of a vital EU vote banning neonicotinoid pesticides on Monday 29th April. Even the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee has concluded certain neonicotinoids are harmful to bees and The March of the Beekeepers will show Mr Paterson the full weight of public, expert and Government opinion and persuade him to now support a European ban.

It is truly extra-ordinary that it is taking this much effort to get the message through to the FUCKWITS that are running this country. This 2013, not 1965. We know these pesticides are killing bees and other invertebrates that are essential to the proper functioning of the ecosystem, not to mention the ECONOMY OF THE UK. We still have farms, right?

Owen Paterson is currently heading for a special place in the history of ECOLOGICAL FUCKWITTERY.

It is truly extra-ordinary that it is taking this much effort to get the message through to the FUCKWITS that are running this country. This 2013, not 1965. We know these pesticides are killing bees and other invertebrates that are essential to the proper functioning of the ecosystem, not to mention the ECONOMY OF THE UK. We still have farms, right?

Owen Paterson is currently heading for a special place in the history of ECOLOGICAL FUCKWITTERY.

Given the blatantly obvious danger these pesticides pose to pollinators one can only suspect the powerful hidden lobbying hand of big-pharma behind the UK government's current intransigence.

Well, now, you may be surprised to learn I'd already reasonably surmised they might be related B. My question was whether they are the same. Whilst you have answered that question with the first part of your post (though a little more expansion on "no" would have been welcome) the second part of your post is, as usual, unnecessarily patronising.

That's a fairly hefty ego you're lugging around with you there B. Either that, or you really do need to work on your communication skills.

There were three bits to my response.
1. the 'No', was just a neat statement of fact, answering your question.
2. I then qualified that by pointing out that there was a reason why the two words had a similarity.
3. I then posted a link that explained what that similarity was and how it arose.
I was trying to be helpful, giving you a short answer to your sensible question and pointing you in the direction of a longer answer should you want it. What more could you have wanted?_________________http://biffvernon.blogspot.co.uk/

There were three bits to my response.
1. the 'No', was just a neat statement of fact, answering your question.
2. I then qualified that by pointing out that there was a reason why the two words had a similarity.
3. I then posted a link that explained what that similarity was and how it arose.
I was trying to be helpful, giving you a short answer to your sensible question and pointing you in the direction of a longer answer should you want it. What more could you have wanted?

Fair enough B. My mistake was in assuming that it would be blindingly obvious to you I was not so unutterably thick as to not already realize that "neonocotinoid", being linguistically very similar to "nicotine", would be obviously related and that my question was, therefore, about whether or not they were essentially synonymous terms.

Bee forages on tobacco-plant flowers. What happens next? Does the bee snuff it (or get lost, or whatever)? And if so, is this a rather serious evolutionary drawback for said tobacco plant?_________________Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
StoriesThe Price of Time

Bee forages on tobacco-plant flowers. What happens next? Does the bee snuff it (or get lost, or whatever)? And if so, is this a rather serious evolutionary drawback for said tobacco plant?

That's exactly what I was wondering about. If true, then one might surmise that the flowers do not contain nicotine. Either that, or nicotine, though a related substance, is not the same as nicotinoids. Nevertheless, I am sure you will have heard of using nicotine from a packet of rolling tobacco as a very effective insecticide, so I'm not sure at all.