I don't think too many people would fault someone for having Orr over Gretzky, but how do you end up with Orr AND Mario over Gretzky? Mario had bigger holes in his game, so that can't be it.

It's not about who is more complete. To me Mario was more dominant the moment he stepped foot on the ice. I've seen too many games where Wayne was like one of the other players and the night would end and he would have 3 points. Oh he had great vision and was creative but he had to work at it. While Mario was more visibly superior to everybody else and he was more naturaly gifted.