tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26258833469206129272014-10-14T05:27:00.781-07:00A Basketball ThingAbel Ramírezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07573773652906806512noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2625883346920612927.post-58162802042245942682012-01-31T13:36:00.000-08:002012-01-31T13:36:29.018-08:00Destroying the Knicks<span id="internal-source-marker_0.9044046590456174" style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"></span><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Arial; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"></span><span id="internal-source-marker_0.9044046590456174" style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">As everyone and their grandmother knows by now, the Knicks are playing awful basketball right now. Many call for Mike D’antoni’s head, while others blame Carmelo Anthony or team owner Jim Dolan. Theories abound as to what is the cause of this mess and how it can be fixed. The problem with that, though, is that there’s no real solution. Not without some highly unlikely roster changes. The Knicks have dug themselves a hole that they won’t be able to get out of for several years.</span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"></span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">When Dolan forced Donnie Walsh to trade most of the team’s above average players(who also happened to fit well in D’antoni’s system) for Carmelo Anthony, he put the team in a very difficult position. Having lost the only pure point guard he had, D’antoni couldn't &nbsp;find a way to make the offense balanced and effective, and since they had given Denver almost all of their trade chips, they didn’t have enough to offer for Chris Paul or any other pure PG. Without that, D’antoni’s offense just can’t be effective. He has very clear limitations as a coach, but if you give him a roster that fits his offensive system and includes a top defensive center like Chandler, he can make it a championship contender. His current roster’s overall passing skills are very limited, and that goes against the foundation of his system, and that’s certainly not his fault. </span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"></span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">In a very smart move, they signed Tyson Chandler, who is perfect for the team and has helped them make huge strides on defense. As good as he is, however, he can’t do much to solve the team’s issues on offense, and at this point, probably no one can. As everyone should have expected, Baron Davis is in even worse shape than usual, which is saying something. He’s not the solution. Also, their cap space is very limited, so it would be very, very hard for them to get the type of pg they’re looking for via free agency. </span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"></span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">Even if they keep the same roster and coaching staff, they will not be this bad all season. Barring injuries to key players, they can’t miss the playoffs with the talent they have; but they have no chance of getting past the first round without a roster or coaching change.</span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"></span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">The Knicks will not contend for a championship for at least three years. That, however, doesn’t mean that they can’t become a mid-tier team that wins over 45-50 games every year and wins a few playoff series. Firing D’antoni and making Mike Woodson the head coach would improve the offense enough to make this a winning team. His experience in winning with an offense that uses a lot of isolation should help a lot. It might not make them a top 10 offensive team, but it should make them above average at least. </span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"></span><br /><span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">As far as the blame goes, Dolan and Anthony should get most of it. The former, for giving up so much for Carmelo, and the latter for threatening to go to another team if NY didn’t do everything possible to get him. Two men with very limited team-building skills were the main players in the building of this roster, and that has predictably resulted in the mess that the Knicks have become. </span>Abel Ramírezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07573773652906806512noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2625883346920612927.post-21103690356437559332011-12-15T19:18:00.000-08:002011-12-15T20:32:16.644-08:00Chris Paul in Lob City<div class="MsoNormal"><table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/LosAngeles06.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="266" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/LosAngeles06.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr><tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">By Thomas Pintaric, via Wikimedia Commons</td></tr></tbody></table><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span><br /><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span><br /><span lang="EN-US">On Wednesday night, the LA Clippers made a blockbuster trade, acquiring Chris Paul and picks from the New Orleans Hornets for Al-farouq Aminu, Eric Gordon, Chris Kaman and Minnesota’s unprotected 2012 first round pick.<o:p></o:p></span><br /><br />Contrary to what most bloggers/analysts are saying, the Hornets might have won this trade. Yes, they gave up a superstar, who also happens to be a top-3 point guard, but they probably got the best return any small market team has ever gotten when trading a superstar. Right now, the Hornets are in position to have two, and maybe three future all-stars by the start of next season. One of those is Eric Gordon, who is probably the best young shooting guard in the game right now. The other two are the two very likely lottery picks New Orleans will have in the next NBA draft, which is considered one of the best in years. As many others have already said, the Hornets are going to be awful this season. That means their first round pick is very likely to be in the top 5, and might end up being the number one pick. They also have Minnesota’s first round pick, which is very likely to be in the top 10. The odds are that in five years, the Hornets will have as many all-stars as the Clippers, and a third player that, if not an all-star, will likely end up being better than anyone on the Clippers’ roster besides Paul and Griffin at that point.</div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The Clippers would have been better off not making this trade. They had a realistic chance to become an elite team in three years. With the development of Griffin, Gordon and Jordan, and the player that came from Minnesota’s first, they were on their way to having a young nucleus similar to Oklahoma City’s. Now, they have a very good team, but not a title contender, and it might be a few years before they reach that level, if they ever do.<o:p></o:p></span><br /><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The current Clippers roster is probably a 6<sup>th</sup> seed in the West. Their offense will probably be much better, with the addition of Paul and Billups and Griffin’s improvement. The defense, however, is likely to remain bad. Thanks to Paul, and to the strides Jordan and Blake are likely to make on that end of the floor, the team will probably do better, but unless Jordan can become a real stopper, it won’t be good enough to make them a contending team. And those who point to what the Hornets accomplished last season with a mediocre team led by Paul are not taking into account enough the impact Monty Williams and Mike Malone had in improving the team’s defense. Paul and David West (before his injury) carried the offense, but the coaching staff improved the defense. Vinny Del Negro doesn’t have a good defensive system, if he has one at all. That’s why the Clippers were so horrible on D even with a very athletic shot blocker in the middle. Until they hire a new coach or find a way to improve their roster, the Clippers will not be championship contenders.<o:p></o:p></span><br /><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">In the next few years, Griffin, and to a lesser extent, Jordan, will get better on both ends of the floor. At the same time, Caron Butler will get worse, as will Billups if he remains with the team. Because of that, the Clippers can only become a contender by acquiring players through free agency and making some trades. The two great players they have right now were pretty easy to get. Blake Griffin was considered the best player in his draft class, and was a no-brainer with the number one pick. Chris Paul is a top 3 point guard, he was available, and after the trade with the Lakers was vetoed and Lamar Odom was traded to Dallas, the Clips were the team that could offer the most assets for Paul. Getting to this point was relatively easy for them, and while it required some perseverance, it didn’t take too much intelligence. Of course, they drafted well when they selected Gordon and Aminu, but that’s pretty much it. The rest has been mostly luck and making easy decisions. Because of that, I don’t trust that their front office will be able to work around the limitations of the new CBA and make this a real championship-caliber roster. The only realistic hope I see for them is that they fire Del Negro after failing to reach the WCF for the first two or three years of the CP3 era and sign a good coach that fits the team’s personnel and has a reliable defensive system. For the time being, though, the Clippers will remain the second-best team in LA. They’ll be very competitive, but not elite. And it could be that way for the rest of Paul's prime.<o:p></o:p></span></div>Abel Ramírezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07573773652906806512noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2625883346920612927.post-81436377014088712842011-10-23T18:38:00.000-07:002011-10-23T18:38:20.765-07:00The Westbrook Situation<div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">During and after last season’s playoffs, Russell Westbrook received a lot of criticism. He was accused of playing selfishly and not deferring enough to Kevin Durant. Many singled out his play as one of the main reasons why the Thunder lost some postseason games and ended up being eliminated by Dallas. Some took it a step further and said he should be traded.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">In response to this, several NBA writers defended him, saying that his mistakes were due to his young age and lack of experience at his position, and that the Thunder would be crazy to trade him. According to them, all he needed was time to mature as a point guard.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">The truth is, Westbrook did play selfishly and he did take too many bad shots. He disrupted the offense at key moments of games. In some plays in which a pass was obviously the right thing to do, he shot the ball himself. All this hurt the Thunder’s chances, and while his play wasn’t the only reason they lost, it certainly was among the most important ones. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">As I said before, some people have guaranteed that he will not play like that forever, and that he only needs experience as a point guard to correct those issues, but there’s no reason to be sure of that. There has been a fair share of NBA players that have played selfishly throughout their whole careers. Why couldn’t Westbrook be one of them? Why should we assume that he will change? Contrary to popular opinion, he has already proved he is <i>capable </i>of playing like a point guard should. He did it in the regular season by averaging over 8 assists per game. He never stopped being a shoot-first PG, but that didn’t prevent him from getting his teammates involved or letting Durant be the focal point of the offense. As he gets more experience, he might be able to further improve his passing abilities, but that is not the problem. He has the ability. He just doesn’t seem to have the willingness to be a team player at all times. It looks like he feels that in important games or moments, he needs to take over offensively. That would explain why he played that way in the playoffs, but not in the regular season.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">If Westbrook is not willing to change his style of play, the team might be better off trading him if the right offer comes along. If he just needed to improve his point guard skills, as they say, then it wouldn’t make any sense to trade him, but he needs to change his mindset, and that is unlikely to happen anytime soon, if it ever does. The Thunder can’t afford to have one of their stars hindering their chances every postseason. If they do choose to explore trade options, though, they should be careful, as trading Westbrook without getting a good enough return would be worse than keeping him. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">Another option would be to find a different head coach with more offensive knowledge who would tell Westbrook not to hog the ball in crunch time and at the same time improve the team’s late game offensive repertoire. That coach would have to be a good fit for the team though, and Russell might not listen to him either, so it wouldn’t be a guaranteed solution to the problem. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">Since there isn’t any one move that would solve the problem for sure, the Oklahoma City front office needs to consider all its options. They shouldn’t decide against trading him or making a coaching change yet, but after the lockout ends, they need to take some time to evaluate their options and see whether or not it is smart to make a change of some kind. However, if they can’t find a good trade or a better coach for the team, their young, potential-laden team might lose out on a chance to win multiple championships, all because of a star point guard with a selfish style of play.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>Abel Ramírezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07573773652906806512noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2625883346920612927.post-58151206134836831672011-10-07T20:31:00.000-07:002011-10-07T20:31:43.048-07:00How far could the Jazz have gone?<div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">The Utah Jazz had a very disappointing season. Most people, including the team’s players, expected at least a playoff spot, and some even expected a top 4 seed. Instead, they wound up losing their longtime coach, their franchise player, and not making the playoffs. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">The Jazz were very unfortunate, and if some things had been different, they would’ve had a chance to go deep in the playoffs. Most people wouldn’t agree with me, but looking at all the circumstances that affected the Jazz 2010-2011 season, it seems to me like that was a legitimate possibility.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">The real reason why the Jazz never really had sustained success, even with Deron Williams, was their offensive issues. Those affected the team’s motivation, and frustrated several players, including, of course, the team’s star and leader, Williams. That situation had a negative effect on the Jazz defense, which unlike others such as Boston’s or Chicago’s, didn’t have an ironclad system and relied heavily on each player giving his best effort on every possession.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">The causes of Utah’s offensive problems were diverse, and they changed as the season advanced. At first, the main causes were the unfamiliarity with the team’s new players, the fact that Deron Williams hadn’t found his long-range shot yet and Al Jefferson’s knee injury, which he later admitted was still affecting his play at that point. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">After that, D-Will was able to find his shot, and the team’s players began to get more and more used to each other, but Al was not 100% healthy yet. The team’s play was improving, but the offense was starting to suffer from starting SG Raja Bell’s lack of production. He wasn’t making three pointers consistently, and his defense wasn’t as effective as it had been in the past, but Coach Jerry Sloan kept playing him for over 30 minutes a game. This reduced the team’s spacing on offense, which was extremely important for Sloan’s offensive system to work. Every night, the team started a lineup that included only one player who could make three pointers on a consistent basis, and that was Deron Williams. When he injured his wrist, that number was reduced to zero. On a system that needs shooters to have opposing defenders’ attention in order to free up space for easy shots in the paint, this was a big problem. Teams began to pack the paint against the Jazz, and there was nothing they could do about it. Other teams’ defenders cheated on Utah’s shooters because they were not a big threat to make long range shots. This made the offense stagnant, frustrated the team and reduced the players’ motivation. Even with all of this, Jerry Sloan didn’t make many changes in the lineup. Raja Bell’s playing time was a lot more than it should have been for a long time, and Gordon Hayward had to wait too long to be given a chance to show his skills and, most importantly, his ability to make three pointers. Jerry Sloan is one of the best basketball coaches of all time, but he made some very important mistakes that in a way led to the situation that caused his resignation. But even with all of that, the Jazz probably would have been able to salvage their season if only Deron Williams had been healthy. For one thing, that would have kept an efficient, consistent shooter in the starting lineup, and would have prevented the team’s offensive issues and frustration from getting that bad. It also would’ve allowed the team to improve substantially towards the end of the season. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">In late February-early March, Al Jefferson’s knee fully healed, and for the first time in the season he was 100% healthy. Around that time, Raja Bell and Andrei Kirilenko got injured, opening a spot for Gordon Hayward. With Deron there, Hayward’s insertion in the starting lineup, coupled with Al Jefferson’s noticeably improved play (due to his healing) would have solved the Jazz offensive problems, and with Jerry Sloan at the helm, the team might have gone pretty far in the playoffs. With a healthy Williams and an effective Hayward, the team would’ve had enough shooting, and that, in turn, would have further improved Al Jefferson’s efficiency down low. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">The Jazz offense could’ve become one of the best in the league from that point on, and the morale lift would’ve gotten the defense back to being around the league average. That would have given the Jazz a great offense and a good enough defense, similar to the Spurs and Nuggets, but with a star that can make clutch plays in crunch time. And, given the number of offensive weapons the Jazz had, that could’ve been enough to reach the Conference Finals, and maybe even the NBA Finals. That may seem like a crazy thought, but I think it would have been possible. In my opinion, there were three main reasons why the Thunder lost to the Mavericks. The first one was Scot Brooks’ lack of creativity on offense, especially in crunch time. The second one was Russell Westbrook’s selfish plays at critical points in several games. If he had made the right, obvious choice in most of those situations, the Thunder might have won one, or even two more games. The third one was Kendrick Perkins’ ineffectiveness on both ends due to him not being 100% healthy. Jerry Sloan is one of the best offensive coaches the NBA has ever had, and I don’t think it can be argued that he has more than enough creativity to make effective half-court plays at any point in a game. No one in that Jazz team would have played in such a selfish and hard-headed way, especially if the offense was working. The Jazz’s frontcourt might or might not have been completely healthy by that point, but there are still clear advantages the Jazz would have had over the Thunder had they reached the WCF. They probably would have lost to the Mavericks anyway, but they might have given them a tougher fight. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><br /></div><div class="Standard" style="text-align: justify;"><span lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">I say all of this to emphasize the potential the Jazz had and how far they could have gone if their best player hadn’t gotten injured. And while some might say that a late-season improvement wouldn’t have been enough for the Jazz to go that far, I think the Memphis Grizzlies are proof that it is possible, and if they had Rudy Gay in that series vs. OKC, I believe they would have gone as far as I think the Jazz could have gone. Utah had a legit chance to become part of the NBA’s elite, but a few unfortunate events prevented that from happening and turned them into a lottery team.&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>Abel Ramírezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07573773652906806512noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2625883346920612927.post-70204704674340670332011-10-05T20:28:00.000-07:002011-10-05T20:37:07.675-07:00The Lakers are not going away<div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: inherit;">Since the Lakers lost to the Mavericks in the second round of the 2011 playoffs, many doubts have been raised about them, their drive, their ability, and their future. Many have suggested that they need to trade one or more of their core players, that they’re too old, and that they can’t win again.<o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: inherit;">I believe none of that is true. <o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: inherit;">This Lakers’ team is very capable of winning more championships, or at least one more. The main issues that caused their loss to the Mavericks won’t necessarily exist in the future. <o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: inherit;">In my opinion, the main reason why the Lakers lost was Gasol’s horrible performance, which he admitted was caused by off the court personal problems. If those problems can be fixed, I don’t see a reason why Gasol can’t go back to being his usual self, and that player is at least a top 5 big man in the NBA. <o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: inherit;">Many people criticized Kobe, who wasn’t healthy, for not being as productive and clutch as in the past, but he was much closer to his usual production than Gasol, the team’s 2<sup>nd</sup>&nbsp;best player, was to his. Gasol’s struggles, paired with Kobe’s physical limitations, made it difficult for the Lakers to score. That affected the team’s motivation, which wasn’t that good to begin with. The team’s lack of motivation affected their play on defense, and without a good enough offense <i>or</i> defense, they couldn’t handle the Mavericks. That’s why they were swept. If Kobe had been healthier and Gasol had not been struggling, the Lakers would’ve won that series. Of course, Dirk was unstoppable, and it probably would’ve taken seven games for the Lakers to beat Dallas, but they were the better team. The main reason why the Mavericks scored that much is the fact that the Lakers were not defending the way they were capable of. Dallas is a great offensive team, but they shouldn’t get as much credit as they have gotten.&nbsp; They didn’t figure out the Lakers’ defense. They took advantage of the Lakers’ defensive issues. The Lakers might not have been capable of stopping, or even slowing Dirk, but they were capable of slowing everybody else, and they didn’t. That’s why I believe that, in different circumstances, they would have won. That is also what makes me think they can win another championship.<o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></div><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: inherit;">If by next season’s playoffs Kobe and Gasol are healthy enough and don’t have any off-court issues bothering them, and most of the team (especially Bynum) is also healthy, the Lakers will have a very good chance at winning another championship. Their team is still capable of beating anyone in a seven game series and with Mike Brown at the helm, their defense should go back to being one of the best. As of right now, there’s no reason to believe that, barring more injuries, the Lakers will get back to being the dominant team they have been in past playoffs.</span>Abel Ramírezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07573773652906806512noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2625883346920612927.post-18057197026751983592011-09-29T21:41:00.000-07:002011-09-29T21:41:14.257-07:00Rajon Rondo Is Better Than You Think<div class="MsoNormal"><br /></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Since the Celtics made their first NBA Finals run with the Big 3, and until the middle point of last season, most people’s opinion about Rajon Rondo seemed to be very positive. Many compared him to the league’s very best, and both during and after the 2010 playoffs, some people argued that he was the best point guard in the NBA. This past season, Rondo started off playing like he was just that, generating talk about the possibility of him breaking John Stockton’s assist average record for a season. Then, he got injured. That first injury, coupled with the other ones he had throughout the season, hindered him and diminished his level of play. His scoring and his passing were both diminished, and, as a result of that, the number of people who counted him among the league’s best at his position decreased rapidly.<o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">That, however, doesn’t mean they were right to change their minds. Actually, the facts indicate that they were, and still are, wrong. In the 2009 and 2010 postseasons, Rajon Rondo showed a level of versatility that only Jason Kidd might have had at the time, and no one else has now. The fact that he started the 2010-2011 season playing as well or better than he had in the previous postseason, and that he never reached that level again after the injury are proof enough that he wasn’t 100% healthy and that if he had been, he probably would’ve had the best season of his career. And if he had had that type of season, people would still be talking about how great he is. That’s why it makes no sense to say that Rondo has declined or that he hasn’t or won’t fulfill the potential he seemed to have.<span>&nbsp; </span>I don’t believe he was going to break Stockton’s record, but I do believe he could’ve averaged over 12 assists, and given his limited offensive game, that would’ve further bolstered the argument that he is the league’s best distributor. <o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">If Rondo had stayed healthy, he would be viewed by many as one of the league’s best point guards, and arguably its best distributor. But he didn’t, so instead, he is seen as a good-but-not-great player, one or two steps below the top tier. <o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">When healthy, Rajon Rondo is one of the best point guards in the league, and if there’s an NBA season and he can stay healthy, he’ll show that he deserves to be called one of the top point guards in the league.<o:p></o:p></span></div><br /><div class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></div>Abel Ramírezhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07573773652906806512noreply@blogger.com1