Too often, we lawyers seem to search for lofty ways to express
our thoughts. Instead, we should be striving for simplicity. Simplicity often
brings clarity, which is the real key to good legal writing. Compare the
following options:

Option 1: Wherefore it
behooves members of the bench and bar to scribe their tomes utilizing
utterances of utmost lucidity, hereinafter follows a discussion of
how best to achieve said utterances.

Achieving simple writing is, well, simple. Use simple
words, simple phrases, simple verbs and simple structure. At the same
time, prefer short sentences and paragraphs. Keep your writing short
and sweet, and you’ll likely be a better legal writer.

Simple WordsWe lawyers tend to prefer fancy words, even when simple
words would work better. This preference for fuzzy-sounding, clarity-squelching
big words is rooted in our history. Our forebears from England brought
with them not only the common law, but also its pompous language. We
can make the same lofty ideas clearer by using short, simple words.

Complex:

Simple:

aforementioned

previously stated [or nothing]

automobile

car

elucidate

explain

expedite

hurry

inasmuch as

since / because

said

this / that

termination

end

utilize

use

An occasional fancy word isn’t a tragedy in your
writing. But watch what happens when fancifiers crowd into one sentence.

Complex example: Inasmuch
as I am an enthusiastic women’s basketball fan, I will utilize
my vacation days to maneuver my automobile to Corvallis next winter
with great repetition, and in the aforementioned city I will observe
said sport as performed by the OSU team.

Simple example: Because
I love women’s basketball, I will use my vacation days to drive
to Corvallis frequently next winter to watch the OSU team play.

The use of fancy words is now called a "Shift-F7" — the
link to the thesaurus feature in Word. A writer who is trying to look
smart can hit Shift-F7 a few times and change from a perfectly clear
sentence to a perfectly obtuse one.

Simple example: The
lawyer’s use of the evidence was risky for all the reasons
discussed earlier.

Shift-F7 example: The
legal representative’s utilization of the evidence was perilous
for all of the aforementioned rationales.

Simple PhrasesWe lawyers also tend to prefer long strings of words,
even when one or two words could get the job done. Do your clients
pay more for fluff? Your writing will likely be clearer if you ax the
excess.

Some of the most commonly used wordy phrases can be split
into three categories: those dealing with time, those addressing causation
and those showing significance. The lists below show how to simplify
your writing by replacing wordy phrases with single words.

Time Phrases:at the
present time now

at that point in time then

during the time that during

in many instances often

in the event that if

prior to before

subsequent to after

Causation Phrases:because
of the fact that because

despite the fact that though

for the purpose of to

in order to to

Significance Phrases:it
is certain that certainly

it is important to note that significantly

there is no doubt that doubtless

Simple VerbsWe add fluff — and excess baggage — when
we dress up simple verbs as nominalizations. ("Nominalization" is
a fancy word for a noun that started its life as a verb.) When you
use a nominalization in place of a verb, you need a new verb to prop
it up. Thus, you could act (simple verb) or take action (nominalization).

If you typically use the following nominalizations, give
consideration to — no, just "consider" — using
their simpler verbs instead.

Nominalization:

Simple Verb:

take action

act

make an assumption

assume

have a collision

collide

draw a conclusion

conclude

give consideration to

consider

raise an objection

object

make a statement

state

Short SentencesWhat’s
true for words is also true for sentences. Short sentences are often
clearer than their hefty alternatives.

The average sentence in your writing should be 25 words
long. Depending on your margin width and your favorite font, 25 words
will fill no more than two or three lines of standard-sized paper.
So when a sentence spills over to a fourth, fifth or sixth line (gasp!),
pull out your hoarded periods and place them appropriately.

Of course, you don’t want a string of sentences
that are exactly 25 words long. Your writing should flow like water,
not stand rigidly like a brigade of soldiers at morning muster. Sentences
with different purposes require different lengths. But remember to
balance the occasional sentence of 37 words with a pithy statement
of 13.

Simple StructureSimple sentence structure generally makes writing easier
to understand. The standard structure in English is subject — verb — object.
The subject is the actor in the sentence; the verb is the action; and
the object receives the action. We sacrifice simplicity when we tinker
with the order of this basic structure, perhaps by putting the recipient
of the action first.

Complex structure:The complaint was filed by Melissa.

By the judge an order was issued. (Is anyone thinking
of Yoda?)

Litigation was avoided by other parties.

Of course, that structure creates passive voice. Don’t
get me started on the potential evils of passive voice! Just review
my colleagues’ essays: "Finding and Fixing the Passive Voice" (July
2007) and "The Beauty of the Verb" (October 2007).
Then note how nicely the following sentences use the standard subject — verb — object structure.

Simple structure:Melissa filed the complaint.

The judge issued an order.

Other parties avoided litigation.

Another challenge to simple sentence structure is what
I call the embedded insight. While writing a perfectly lovely sentence,
the writer has a brain spark that he must insert immediately. Frequently,
that insertion interrupts the flow of the sentence and separates the
subject from the verb. Both results defeat clarity. Consider moving
the insight to its own sentence. The following examples show a complex
sentence of 42 words broken into two sentences that average 21 words.
One sentence has just seven words; the next has 34.

Complex structure:The
librarian, who had extensive experience dealing with members of the
public who tried to research issues without using the online explanations
the staff had prepared, was running out of patience with the current
patron who refused to listen to her suggestions.

Simple structure: The
librarian was running out of patience. Although she had extensive
experience dealing with members of the public who tried to research
issues without using the online explanations the staff had prepared,
the current patron refused to listen to her suggestions.

Short ParagraphsYou can further simplify your writing by using short
paragraphs. One-half page each is a good baseline. As with sentences,
a variety of paragraph lengths will help keep the reader riveted to
your prose. When you see a whole page without a paragraph break, have
pity on the reader and break the big chunks into more accessible bits.

ConclusionLawyers should write clearly and concisely. Doing so
is as simple as a KISS: Keep It Short and Sweet.

Sources:The New Oxford American Dictionary (2d ed. 2005).

Richard C. Wydick, Plain English for Lawyers (5th
ed. 2005).

ABOUT THE AUTHORSuzanne E. Rowe is an associate professor at the University of Oregon
School of Law, where she directs the Legal Research and Writing Program.
Her email is srowe@law.uoregon.edu. She is grateful to Amy Nuetzman
and Harvey Rogers for comments on this article.