Thursday, May 28, 2009

Yet another Singapore lawyer steals $68,000.00 from his client.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Yet another Singapore lawyer steals his client's money. This time it is $68,000. The thief this time is lawyer David Khong, aged 42. Singapore really lives it to it's reputation of having the most dishonest bunch of lawyers in the world. For a legal profession in the tiny country of Singapore which only has 4.5 million people and a lawyer population of only 2,500 or so, you read with great regularity of lawyers running away with their client's money. This is tragic since the legal profession is supposed to be noble, and it is most extraordinary to see so many dishonest lawyers in a profession with so few members.

David Khong, the lawyer thief in this case, had absconded with the money after he got possession of it from a purchaser of a property in Singapore worth millions. This story appears in the Singapore state controlled newspaper the Straits Times online edition of May 27, 2009.

Only 4 days ago on May 24, 2008 in the post "Singapore can only hope to be a tourist destination. Nothing more" in this blog, I had written about another lawyer thief in Singapore Udayasurian Sidambaram who had stolen $100,000.00 of his client's money. For that he was suspended from practicing for a year.

The almost clockwork regularity and frequency with which Singapore lawyers are arrested for stealing their client's money is shocking. Almost every other day you read of lawyers running away with their clients money. It has almost become Singapore's signature conduct. Each time you deal with a Singapore lawyer, you get the jitters not knowing whether he too is a crook who will take off with your money.

This unusually large number of cheats in the Singapore legal profession which happens to have only 2500 lawyers in all has made it known throughout the world as a hub for dishonest lawyers. This can only adversely effect Singapore's business competitiveness and reputation. I have heard that foreign companies and individuals operating in Singapore are taking pains to try to avoid dealing with local lawyers for their peace of mind and increasingly they are moving to other more respected jurisdictions such as Sydney Australia or London to settle their disputes. Especially now with the deep recession affecting Singapore, the bad reputation of Singapore lawyers is further compounding the difficulties of this one party state.

You may want to ask yourself why? Why are there so many dishonest lawyers in that small island. I look at it this way. The administration itself has lost all respect. And when the country's rulers themselves are thoroughly unethical, not to mention downright corrupt, how do you expect the citizens to behave? Lee Kuan Yew, whom many refer to as the founder of modern Singapore is in fact the most corrupt human being in that small island. You would already know by now that he pays himself (or steals, which ever way you want to call it), $3.7 million a year. He has the audacity to call this a "salary". Not only that he pays this amount to each of his children, all his family members and everyone else whom he cares to be generous to. And not only that, it is generally believed that he steals even more, but as to how much we do not know. And if any citizen would dare to question him about it, he will use his judges to abuse the law and finish you off.

It is not only him. Every one in his government is, just like him thoroughly dishonest and corrupt.

And mind you, these are the "role models" in Singapore, corrupt crooks like him. So this would explain the great prevalence of dishonesty not only among lawyers but throughout the population. It is easy to know why. Surely, if the very men at the top can be so dishonest and not feel any guilt or responsibility at all, why should not the average man or the average lawyer have some part of the loot? Singaporeans no longer look up to the universal virtues of integrity, honesty and responsibility. These are no longer virtues in that island. What matters is money, no matter how dishonestly you find it. If it is good enough for Lee Kuan Yew the dictator of that one party state, surely it is good enough for others.

The other worrying trend is the increasing numbers of Indian lawyers who have become thieves. In the past they were not that many. Many had some sense of decency. But in the recent past, Indians have joined the other races in having as many dishonest lawyers in them. I guess Lee Kuan Yew's dishonesty rubs off on them crossing racial boundaries.

Singapore now is undoubtedly, to use Singapore's favorite term, a "hub" for dishonest lawyers.

Your letters are welcome. We reserve the right to publish your letters. Please Email your letters to nair.gopalan@yahoo.com And if you like what I write, please tell your friends. You will be helping democracy by distributing this widely. This blog not only gives information, it dispels government propaganda put out by this dictatorial regime.

3 comments:

Anonymous
said...

indeed, i feel sad that the first reaction that my friend received when he said he's gng to law faculty was "oh are you going to run away with money too". it really really is a very serious thing. although there have been statements from the govt that they will increase the number of law school students, this is not enough. too many facets of a society needs lawyers, especially for pro bono work that involves helping out the lower levels of society where they are often deprived of legal aid and advice.

legal knowledge by the public is not encouraged here. i love the example of citing "look at NUS. where are the majority of the faculties. where are the law and public policy faculties. these are faculties that are so "sensitive" to our government." i know it's a slightly far fetched idea, but im uncomfortable with the idea that it is these two facs that are in the bukit timah campus, almost "cut off" from the mainstream faculties. it seems to discourage communication and exchange with the mainstream and inculcate a sense of "elitism" within students who study law or public policy.

According to both the Straits Times Online article and the one in The Business Times (http://www.asiaone.com/News/The%2BBusiness%2BTimes/Story/Lawyer%2B%2527flees%2BS%2527pore%2Bwith%2Bclient%2527s%2B%252468%252C000%2527.html), this incident happened back in August of 2007. This is not breaking news; Singapore has been a "hub" of ocrrupt lawyers for quite a while now.

Followers

About Me

Determined to find the Truth.
Born Singapore, educated Winstedt School 2 (next to Monks Hill in Newton, Singapore) Raffles Institution, National Service, some travel in Europe, then law studies England, return to Singapore, practiced for 10 years, active Workers Party member, stood elections 1988 and 1991 in Singapore, was harassed and persecuted by Lee Kuan Yew for my political beliefs, left for USA, obtained asylum and admitted California State Bar, practice law ever since in Fremont California near San Francisco. Relinquished Singapore citizenship 2005 because I was not prepared to permit Lee Kuan Yew to unjustly retain my CPF funds if I remained Singapore Citizen. On principle, the only correct thing for me to do was to give it up, for my CPF funds. I am an American Citizen as of 2004.