Suppressed Wikinews investigative article about pornography on Wikipedia from the week of May 12, 2008. The article was deleted immediately prior to publication after a call from the Wikimedia foundation head office. It is believed the article was deleted because it did not promote Wikimedia, although the excuse used to do so, by Wikimedia counsel Michael Godwin was that it might be defamatory towards the Eric Moeller, the Foundations own deputy director.

Wikinews and Wikipedia are legally and physically controlled by the "Wikimedia foundation" (no relation to WikiLeaks or most other "Wiki's").

A 78 message thread on the Wikimedia Foundation Mailinglist appears here. The most important message of which follows:

Re: Fwd: [WL-News] Wikimedia Foundation in danger oflosing immunity under the Communications Decency Act Click to flag this post
by Brian McNeil-2 May 20, 2008; 03:24am
I deleted the article.
Cary contacted me via Skype late at night and said Mike [Godwin, WMF counsel] wanted to talk to
me. I forwarded my cellphone number. When I saw the article in question,
there was no doubt in my mind that it could readily be construed as
actionable libel. Thus, I deleted it.
The Bauer case is more complex. Her article was removed from Wikipedia - as
I see it - in a good faith move to encourage the court to throw out her
action against WMF. Wikinews reported on this, and that article was quashed.
Everyone will be able to see why when - hopefully - the court throws out her
allegations against the WMF. In this case the EFF is championing the cause,
but rules and guidelines are needed; both to retain S.230 protection and to
maintain Wikinews' impartiality.
Brian McNeil
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list

An easy to read text version of the suppressed article follows this summary at the end of the page.

A scandal erupted on the website of Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, after it was discovered that a CD cover with an image of a nude underage girl was uploaded to the site. As a result of recent media coverage surrounding the incident, the FBI will be stepping in to investigate Wikipedia for possibly violating United States federal pornography laws.

The cover is from a 1976 album of the Scorpions titled 'Virgin Killer' and has the image of an underage girl, posing nude, with an crack crossing over her genitals, but nothing blocking out her breasts. The girl appears to be around 10-years-old. The U.S. banned that cover, and the band later replaced the image with one of the group. The cover was uploaded in 2006, but Wikinews has learned, that on May 9, (21:17 UTC) despite a result of 43 to 12 in favor of 'keep' on a deletion request, the image was deleted from Wikipedia by an administrator known as Angusmclellan. The administrator states that the image was deleted because "outside pressure should never influence us, not to do what the pressure group want, nor to do the opposite just to spite them. We should base our decisions on Wikipedia's policies and values. Those policies and values say that we should only use non-free content under stringent conditions. This image didn't and doesn't meet those conditions and should be deleted. If it does meet them in the future it should be undeleted."

"Children use Wikipedia all of the time for reports for school, and this stuff is not just pornography, this is hard-core pornography. Much of it may even be in violation of our nation's obscenity laws," said Concerned Women for America's policy director for cultural issues and attorney, Matt Barber.

According to a report by WorldNetDaily, Deputy Director of the Wikimedia Foundation, Erik Möller, endorsed child pornography and even alleged that Möller was posting it on his website humanist.de. The image, since deleted, depicted two children, one male and one female, who appear to be much younger than 18, naked with the female giving the male a 'handjob'. The image can be seen in a cache of Google, and is clearly marked as having been posted to Möller's website.

"If there was any doubt, yes, I am defending that children can have sex with each other. Not only adolescents, but also children of earlier ages -- whenever they want to," stated Möller in 2001, although denies that he supports pedophilia saying "I have pondered putting a disclaimer into the article ("I am not a pedophile. I am a 22-y-o heterosexual white male") but I see no reason to give this concession to the child sex hysteria."

Wikinews has contacted Möller regarding the allegations, but has not yet received a response.

Child pornography is not the only concern, but also images depicting what some could label as 'hardcore pornography'. Several articles on Wikipedia, such as Autofellatio, which is self oral stimulation of the penis, and shows an image of a male applying oral sex to himself. The article fluffer, which is when a member of the crew who is filming a pornographic film is to sexually arouse the individuals performing in the movie, and shows an image of two males having anal sex, while a cameraman hands them a towel.

Wikipedia is not the only project to host questionable material. Wikimedia's 'Commons', a wiki dedicated to hosting images that could potentially be used on other projects, also has a variety of nudity and sexually explicit material. On the category of Striptease, dozens of photographs show females in total nudity on the front page, with some photos having several females posing nude. Through our investigation, Wikinewshas learned that most of the images are not used in articles on Wikipedia, but are used only on user pages.

Commons policy on what images are considered to be within the "projects scope" states that "files uploaded to the Commons have to be useful for some Wikimedia project. Media files that are not useful for any Wikimedia project are beyond the scope of Wikimedia Commons." This includes, but is not limited to "private image collections and the like. Wikimedia Commons is not a web host for e.g. private party photos, self-created artwork without educational purpose and such."

This raises the question as to whether or not Wikimedia should ask for age verification when looking at material which contains sexually explicit material. Wikinews spoke to ... who stated ....