Did Wolves and Dogs make us Human?

I just read the highly recommended Animals in Translation: Using the mysteries of Autism to decode animal behavior by Temple Grandin and
Catherine Johnson (Bloomsbury, 2005).

The most interesting argument for me concerns the relationship between humans and dogs.
We often hear about how humans changed the wolf into dogs, but it seems this was not a one-way process.
Humans not only impacted the shape and behavior of domesticated dogs, but wolves also impacted human evolution!

The authors point out that the first archeological evidence of a dog burial by humans dates back 14 000 years, but genetic research has shown that
domesticated dogs diverged from wolves 135 000 years ago (Grandin and Johnson, p. 304).

That's a very long time, and certainly significant in evolutionary terms.
So perhaps the Australian aboriginal saying, "Dogs make us human", conveys a great truth.
(Grandin and Johnson, p. 306.)

The human domestication of dogs (or the dog domestication of humans?) happened at a time when our ancestors had barely evolved from Homo Erectus.
Gradually they changed from more ape-like behavior to a culture that is also highly typical of wolves and dogs:

Going over all the evidence, a group of Australian anthropologists believes that during all those years when early humans were associating with
wolves they learned to act and think like wolves. Wolves hunted in groups; humans didn't. Wolves had complex social structures; humans didn't
... wolves were highly territorial; humans probably weren't - again, judging by how non-territorial all primates are today. ... When you think about
how different we are from other primates, you see how dog-like we are.

(Grandin and Johnson, p. 304.)

The authors illustrate this further, and more astoundingly suggest that our relationship with wolves changed the structure of our brains. In humans
the mid-brain (which handles emotions and sensory data) shrank, as did the olfactory bulbs that handle smell. To conclude on the unique relationship
between wolf and mankind:

Dog brains and human brains specialized: humans took over the planning and organizing tasks, and dogs took over the sensory tasks. Dogs and people
co-evolved and became even better partners, allies and friends.

( P. 306.)

I think it's entirely plausible, and without wolfy we'd still be living in caves, like the Neanderthals, who, as the authors mention (p. 305), never
domesticated wolves.

I now wonder how the kitty cats may have influenced humans, although it seems like a somewhat different relationship. Nevertheless, for agricultural
peoples they were an organic form of pest control.

In any case, what does ATS think on the theory that dogs made us humans?
Are we "dogmen", or "wolfmen"?

However for tens of thousands of years humans and dogs would have lived in the wild where neither species had a flush toilet, and despite some
civilizations that had a form of sanitation, the vast majority of people also lived without it until fairly recently, and they still do in some
countries.

I think there's a good argument to say that humans might not have made it without our partnership with dogs.

We're naturally vulnerable at night with our poor sight, average hearing and habit of sleeping too. Having dogs would make up for those disadvantages
in at least two ways. The first being their superior senses for alerting us to human attackers as well as nocturnal predators. The second being their
ability to scare away or deter those same predators. Another underestimated bonus would be how they kept vermin away and lowered the risk of catching
whatever diseases they might carry.

Put another way, try and imagine how we would have managed without these benefits?

Even as we turned toward animal husbandry and farming, dogs would be very useful in the same way guard dogs and sheepdogs are today.

Cats on the other hand, if they could spell better, would probably write something like the above about us. 'Yeah humans keep us safe from larger
predators and allow us to doss about licking our coats. They give us food and keep us warm. In return we infect massive numbers of them with microbes
that can drive them to suicide. meowlol'

Good point, but it fails to explain why not all hominids lost their enormous eyes for night-vision, even when they had fire.
The Neandethals are believed to have never lost their night-vision, and yet they had fire, but they never had dogs.

Indeed, it fails to explain why dogs never lost their night-vision, even when their ancestors lay by man's fire for a very long time.

It's believe oxytocin caused this change in them by feeding camp wolves human breast milk. Oxytocin I believe oxytocin is unqiue amongst mammals. Builds a bond between mother and child during
breastfeeding, also they say it makes you feel good, the hug drug as it's been called.

Also there is a nice documentary called And Man Created Dog. Worth watching if you love dogs, and it's from NatGeo I believe and they always make well
produced documentaries.

I'd say dogs were vital to our early survival, and are still extremely useful to this day, plus whats more loyal than a dog?

I also find it fascinating how dogs are used in therapy, saw a video of an ex-soldier who suffered from PTSD and the dog was trainer to reassure him
whenever he felt nervous or discomforted, truly a symbiotic relationship for our two species for quite some time

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.