If I may beg the indulgences of you for the moment. Oh my this causes much of the concern to be because unlike the person who has posted above from me with the sarcasm I should state that I look at all of the issues from two sides and this is not the situation upon which is the exception to the life rule of two-sided looking of me. One side of this is that we must set them up the bomb and the other side of this is we must not set them up the bomb. I do not wish to be the judge of this but if I was the judge of this I would look at this from these sides.

The first side of this is that we should set them up the bomb. This side says that the concern upon which is noted is that if the nuclear missile silos of the Iranians are allowed to have existence in the pis of hell of fortification then they will use these on the allies such as Israel and Canada and the fallout of the nuclear waste could make the radioactive Wailing Wall or the radioactive Inuit both of which could cause much suffering to others in the world. From this side it seems as though it would be the necessity to set them up the bomb for which they do not cause the destruction. According to the article upon which is currently linked through the Telegraph.co.uk website the US of America has the 30,000 Labrador bomb upon which it can use to destroy these evil Ruskies...I mean Iranians to the oblivion and prevent the massive use of the weaponry.

The other side of this says look they have told us that they only wish to use this for the purposes of electricity and they seem very much legit. Why would these individuals do the lying to we? If we would set them up the bomb then they would not be able to have the electricity to watch the reruns of Maury and this would cause the dramatic decrease in the sale of American paternity tests to Iran. Do you wish to be the job killer, US of American Air Force Academy Football Team? I do not think you wish for this now do you.

One thing that I can be sure of is that this entire thread will be full of well thought out and purely rational postings such as the own of me. LAUGHTER OL who am I giving the jokings to? Of course it will not as I have seen this from two sides but others will see this from only one side. I do not wish to be the judge of this but do you think that we should do this threatening? I am asking you the Fark.com website and will send the results to the Head Airmaster for the consideration.

/f*ck uncle sam//treat us all like terrorists, don't be surprised when some people start acting like terrorists...///i studied terrorists in grade school; their names were Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Jackson...//

I was going to make some lengthy commentary on some of the possible ramifications of that thing and how it represents America's current war-making practices, but I realized that my point basically boiled down to, "Someone's compensating, and because we can."

Here's a thought. What if neocon moles within the high levels of the departments of State and Defense are lobbying for air strikes that will just HAPPEN to take out Iran's oil fields along with their nuclear infrastructure, thereby driving up the price of U.S.-produced natural gas and shale oil, benefiting THIS GUY.

I'm not saying T. Boone Pickens is committing treason to line his pockets; I'm just asking a question.

mbillips:Here's a thought. What if neocon moles within the high levels of the departments of State and Defense are lobbying for air strikes that will just HAPPEN to take out Iran's oil fields along with their nuclear infrastructure, thereby driving up the price of U.S.-produced natural gas and shale oil, benefiting THIS GUY.

[www.boonepickens.com image 217x219]

I'm not saying T. Boone Pickens is committing treason to line his pockets; I'm just asking a question.

Ah so that's Pickens' Plan! I thought it was just trying to convince us to frak the hell out of our water supply so he can die with a few more billion in his pockets.

Eh, if you think of it as 15 tons, or 1/125 of a Hiroshima bomb, it doesn't seem so big. We used to have nuclear artillery shells with WAY more explosive force than that. And depth charges (light fuse and get away fast).

but the thing you must remember is that it's not just a big-ass bomb, but the shape of it, the materials, and the guts inside are what make this remarkable. Any chump can load up a huge bomb casing with tons of high explosives, but they're all going to kaboom either in an airburst and knock over all the soft stuff, or mcBOOM when it hits the ground and make a big crater. Your reinforced concrete bunker, buried many feet below that surface, however, may be shaken but still in business.

But this baby, oh no, THIS baby is designed to punch a starter hole, even explode a bit to open it up and get serious penetration, and only then does it unleash the full majesty and fury of the payload. THAT is the genius of this bomb, the ability to maintain integrity as it pounds deep into the loins of our enemy, ramming deep into the interior, before the glorious and inevitable release. Mmmm.

AngryJailhouseFistfark:But this baby, oh no, THIS baby is designed to punch a starter hole, even explode a bit to open it up and get serious penetration, and only then does it unleash the full majesty and fury of the payload. THAT is the genius of this bomb, the ability to maintain integrity as it pounds deep into the loins of our enemy, ramming deep into the interior, before the glorious and inevitable release. Mmmm.

urban.derelict:Bomb a country for using nuclear power, which you, yourself use?

/f*ck uncle sam//treat us all like terrorists, don't be surprised when some people start acting like terrorists...///i studied terrorists in grade school; their names were Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Jackson...//[lh6.googleusercontent.com image 640x176]