[Council] JEP-0029 (JIDs)

+1
A random note (which should be intuitive) : Normalization other than
normalization form 'C' (Canonical Composition) may cause a previously
valid JID to become invalid due to growth beyond the size constraints
specified by this JEP. In the case of compatibility normalization forms,
this might not be possible to undo.
-David Waite
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>The Last Call that I announced in the Standards JIG for JEP-0029
>(Definition of Jabber Identifiers) has expired. In other words, it's time
>to vote. Please review the JEP if you have not already done so and vote
>accordingly:
>>http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0029.html>>I have cc'd the JEP author on this email, so please reply to all if you
>have issues with this JEP.
>>Thanks!
>>Peter
>>--
>Peter Saint-Andre
>email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org>weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/>>_______________________________________________
>Council mailing list
>Council at jabber.org>http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/council>>