News and updates on potential cures for type-1 diabetes, that are in human (or clinical) trials.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Diamyd Fails in Phase-III Trial

Diamyd Fails in Phase-III Trial

Diamyd's European phase-III trial has failed. The official quote is "did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint". Basically, the the people who got the drug did not do better than those who did not, in the the most important measurement of success. The primary endpoint for this experiment was C-peptide generation, which is a marker for natural insulin production. Basically, they were hoping that giving this drug would help honeymoon type-1 diabetics generate more of their own insulin, but it did not.

(By the way: if that paragraph sounds familiar, it's because its the exact same paragraph that I used to describe Tolerx's Otelixizumab failure a few weeks ago, and could have been used to describe MacroGenics's Teplizumab failure a few weeks before that. It applies pretty much the same to all three. They all failed in about the same way and at almost the same point in their development cycle. They were all in phase-III clinical trials.)

This is a vaccine like treatment designed to teach the body's own immune system to stop attacking it's own beta cells. You can think of it like the anti-alergy injections that people sometimes get. They give a little of the allergen so that the body slowly becomes used to it. The company's description is this: "with Diamyd® is thought to induce tolerance to GAD, thereby intervening in the autoimmune attack and preserving the capacity to produce insulin in patients with autoimmune diabetes".

Where is Diamyd Now?

The situation for Diamyd is a little more complex than for ToleRx or MacroGenics, because there are more different studies being done with Diamyd's drug than for ToleRx's or MacroGenics's drugs, and those studies are being done by more different people. Diamyd is planning to continue their large phase-III trial in the US, which is basically a twin of this trial that failed. And they are also going to continue following the patients in this trial, just in case there are good results after a longer period of time. I don't hold out much hope for either of those studies being successful.

Additionally, there is at least one study which is using Diamyd to try to prevent type-1 diabetes by giving it to people who have not yet been diagnosed. There is at least one phase-II study being done by academics in the US (so not run by Diamyd). Finally, there is a very small "combo" study being done at the NIH where Diamyd is being combined with two other drugs to try to either regrow beta cells, or get more insulin out of the existing beta cells. The hope is the combination of all three drugs might impact type-1 diabetes. I expect all three of these trials to continue, and they are all a little different from the one that failed, so there still is some hope.

So Where are We Now?

I think everyone needs to understand that these last six months have been disastrous in for human trials designed to lead to a cure for type-1 diabetes. We've gone from having 4 drugs in phase-III trials -- the last phase before market approval -- to having just 1. The remaining one is DiaPep277. On average, a drug which enters phase-III trials should successfully move to the next stage (market approval) about 55% of the time. In fact, for type-1 diabetes we are currently somewhere between 0% and 25% (the higher number only if DiaPep277 eventually gets approved).

Also, it is disturbing to note that no new drugs have started phase-III trials in the last two years. We have gotten new phase-I and phase-II drugs, but nothing has entered phase-III trials to take the place of the three that have dropped out. That's a bad sign as well.

I'm not sure the proper musical background for this blog entry, but definitely something by Nine Inch Nails, maybe "Something I Can Never Have".

You Won't Hear It Here, First
I was talking on the phone to a research analyst months ago, and he as me "how do you know all this research news before anyone else". I was so shocked, I almost dropped the phone. Because it's not true. Almost never am I the first person to publish something in my blog. Why not? First, because I'm in California. That means if something happens in Europe or the East Coast, local bloggers will be posting about it hours before me. But the big reason is that I'm not trying to to be quick; I'm trying to provide context and thoughtful reflection on the news. I'm not trying to be news clipping service. My own goal, is to blog on important events within a week of when they occur, and more minor events within a month. But I don't always succeed even at that.

Joshua LevyAll the views expressed here are those of Joshua Levy, and nothing here is official JDRF or JDCA news, views, policies or opinions.
Blog: http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com
To Get as Email Join here: http://groups.google.com/group/type-1-diabetes-clinical-trials-news

My Most Important Posts

Follow by Email

This blog discusses cures and preventatives for type-1 diabetes that are either in human trials or just about to start. Treatments for diabetes are not generally discussed here, unless they can turn into a cure or a preventative. My definition of a cure is this:1. Blood sugar control without testing and with doctor's visits 4 times a year, or less. Any cure must result in an average lifespan close to normal.2. Does not require a lifetime of immunsuppressive drugs, so it is not trading one treatment for another. (but a couple of operations, or a short course of drugs is OK)Obviously, this is my personal definition of a cure; yours may differ.Because a cure for type-1 diabetes is likely to involve a combination of several different drugs or treatments, I try to follow research into anything which may be an important part of the cure.

My Non-Conflict of Interest Statement

For the first 10 years of running this blog, I did not work for a company doing medical research. In 2018, I started working for Bigfoot Biomedical, which is developing an "automated insulin dosing/delivery solution" (what many call an Artificial Pancreas).

I blog on research aimed at curing type-1 diabetes, and I view Bigfoot Biomedical's work as treating type-1 diabetes (not a cure at all). Therefore, I don't view this work as conflicting with my blogging. However, if you consider the kind of automated insulin dosing/delivery solution that Bigfoot is developing to be an actual cure for type-1, then this would conflict with my blogging. I think they are quite different.

I don't get paid in any way by any company working on a cure for type-1 diabetes; I never have. And that includes free samples, free travel, or free anything. I do sometimes participate in market research studies or focus groups, and they sometimes pay.

None of the hours that I have put into my blog, or the posts that I make to any web site, has ever been paid for. (Except for some very nice and heart felt thank-you emails, and those are worth more than money.)

My daughter has type-1 diabetes and participates in clinical trials. I sometimes report on trials that she participates in, but I do not reveal her participation because I consider her medical history to be private.

I sometimes "beta test" new software or devices involved in type-1 diabetes. When I'm blogging about something where I have been given special access, I say so.

In the past I have volunteered with JDRF and The NIIB Project. I currently am a fellow with JDCA. The JDRF and NIIB work was completely unpaid. JDCA has given me equipment that I use to help my blogging, and on one occasion paid for specific consulting work.