Know Thy Enemy, Know Thyself, For War Is The Art Of Self-Deceit

Another interview here. Please listen to my host Eric’s sourced citations as we travel through the construct, where he calls out just who’s really behind everything. I was honestly taken by surprise by his continuous, poignant references to the hidden hand behind it all. Amusingly, the comments on Youtube suggest I was avoiding the subject, as if I didn’t want to talk about the “Order.” If I’m not being censored I’m being falsely or fallaciously judged. I was even called a “new age gnostic mystic!” LOL! I’m not even sure what that is, but it let’s me know that most of us are so offended by the truth that if our rhetoric doesn’t fall into some category or already established belief system, that when an original thinker comes along we simply can’t handle it because we can’t classify it. And so it’s easier to dismiss the information by dismissing its speaker, ad hominem, by categorizing him (me) into a nonsensical thing like this. In my defense, though I don’t really feel like I need one, I was listening and learning to Eric like everyone else in the process. So I say, well done Eric. But my lack of response was honestly one of admitted ignorance to the facts stated, meaning I simply didn’t know these facts. I didn’t really understand how powerful this Order is because it’s not been my main area of study for the last 8 years, and so my comments are more generalized to what I do know. Shocking. That must mean I’m a Jesuit agent as well as a Gnostic mystic new age what-ever-the-fuck I could be. My lack of commentary is not a covering up or protectionism of the Jesuits, but rather my own ignorance on the subject. Sorry to disappoint. But now my suspicions on the subject are certainly confirmed. And I invite you to learn as well, for here we find not only the lies and liars but the source of them. And to Eric, I say WOW, great research, and thank you.

We had a few audio issues on the recording, an echo, etc. that were addressed by the end, getting a bit worse in the middle. Par for the course. It’s worth sitting through though, me thinks, as quality does get better…

JUDAIZE – verb intransitive – To conform to the religious doctrines and rites of the Jews. They–prevailed on the Galatians to judaize so far as to observe the rites of Moses in various instances.

JUDAIZER – noun – One who conforms to the religion of the Jews.

JUDAICALLY – adverb – After the Jewish manner.

JUDAISM – noun – 1.The religious doctrines and rites of the Jews, as enjoined in the laws of Moses.Judaism was a temporary dispensation. 2.Conformity to the Jewish rites and ceremonies.

DOCTRINE – noun – [Latin , to teach.] 1. In a general sense, whatever is taught. Hence, a principle or position in any science; whatever is laid down as true by an instructor or master.The doctrines of the gospel are the principles or truths taught by Christ and his apostles.The doctrines of Plato are the principles which he taught. Hence a doctrine may be true or false; it may be a mere tenet or opinion. 2. The act of teaching. He taught them many things by parables, and said to them in his doctrine.Mark 4:2. 3. Learning; knowledge. Whom shall he make to understand doctrine? Isaiah 28:9. 4.The truths of the gospel in general. That they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior in all things. Titus 2:1. 5. Instruction and confirmation in the truths of the gospel.2 Timothy 3:10.

–=–

Now we may really grasp here not only the concept of why we should be taking no other doctrine (truth/false truth) than that the scripture, but that we already have done so according to our status in society (personhood), our memberships to false corporate religions (artificial persons), and by our legalistic, secular, antichrist works. We cannot move forward, and we certainly cannot quit this legal matrix system, without first understanding how these false doctrines (truths) have been institutionally (corporately) forced upon us through our status (legal persona). The truth (God) will never be found in the legal systems and corporations (church and state) of man, for they are not of God’s realm, which is Truth, which is never built by the hands of men.

–=–

“…that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine(Law/Truth),Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith (truth) unfeigned: From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.”

—1 Timothy 1: 3-7, KJB

–=–

“But refuse profane and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness.”

—1Timothy 4:7, KJB

–=–

“For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s (gain, advantage) sake. One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable (idolotrous), and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.”

—Titus 1: 10-16, KJB

–=–

Strong’s #G2041 – ergon (ἔργον) – WORKS – From a primary (but obsolete) ergo (to work), used in the scriptures 176 times as the following words:work(152x), deed(22x), doing(1x), labour(1x).

Outline of Biblical Usage:

1. Business, employment, that which any one is occupied.

A. That which one undertakes to do, enterprise, undertaking.

2. Any product whatever, any thing accomplished by hand, art, industry, or mind.

3. An act, deed, thing done: the idea of working is emphasized in opposition to that which is less than work.

–=–

What is your job, your employment. How are you being used by the legal matrix? What is your occupation inside the evil, and what is the product of your labour? What art (lie) holds your mind? How are your actions in any way in tribute or worship of God? The Law, the Doctrine is clear that all of your works must be put forth to God. In other words, all that you do should be toward and in support of Truth, of Nature and Its Law, toward the charity and good will of and to all men. This not only defines but proves a true son of God, a follower (not idol worshiper) of the doctrine (truth) of Christ.

Thank you Eric, for clearing up the source behind it all!

Here’s an interesting lecture on the subject as well:

“John McGreevy helps us to understand the remarkable rebirth and flourishing of the Jesuits as a global order in a very short time in the 19th century, showing how the Jesuits in the United States, many of them refugees from expulsions in Europe, nurtured a Catholic modernity that served as a disciplined counter-cultural force operating through parishes, schools, and associations… He places the Jesuits at the center of a worldwide clash between Catholics and Liberal Nationalists…”

12 Comments

tony tee

It’s a lifelong perpetual battle going on where Sun Tzu’s “Art of War” has a taken on an awakened relevance and meaning. Level 2 mental comprehension comes into play with a new and different outlook from a deeper rabbit hole.

I don’t want to say I’ve given up on the radio circuit… or perhaps they on me? Either way, I don’t find myself contacting much of anyone anymore. It feels pretty empty out there. I am always open for any interviews, but more importantly anyone to talk heart to heart, and I find my personal (off-air) conversations much more beneficial and spiritual. No money or advertisements, no other ears to please, and no idiots trying to box me into some false paradigm group or category so they can pretend what I say isn’t true.

And by the way, as with a few examples, I’ve no problem with Joe except his demonization of the Bible, that is, throwing the Bible out with religious history, as if the Bible didn’t come first. Whatever else I might have felt came from that a-hole Jan Irvin, who assassinated Joe’s character as much as my own, in that order. If anything, I may very well owe Joe an apology for believing Irvin’s bullshit. I may owe an apology to more than one. And I’m sure I’m not the only one whose chain was yanked in this way by Jan to do his dirty work.

Maxx

I wasn’t much for Saul from Tarsus, until Titus 1 . That pretty much somes it up. The definition I use for jews is John 8:44-48 by Jesus. Jews are sa Sums it all up in a tidy package. Jews are anti Christ. Jews are satanists. Judaism is satanism.
The day the jews killed the Christ, was a declaration of war against God.

Luke 19:27 King James Version (KJV)

27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.

(1Peter 3:21-22) Jesus Christ… Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made SUBJECT unto him.

(This word SUBJECT was a Greek military term meaning “to arrange [troop divisions] in a military fashion under the command of a leader”. In non-military use, it was “a voluntary attitude of giving in, cooperating, assuming responsibility, and carrying a burden”.)

The Law (Christ) must be voluntarily followed and obeyed, and only then is the power (and burden) of Christ on your side, for you are under God. He that rules without Christ at his right hand has no authority to rule in God’s Name (Jehovah). Jesus Christ translates to “Jehovah is salvation.” Thus, according to the Law, the strongest must serve the weakest in humility, the burden of strength in God.

How can anyone mistake this self-evident truth for religious nonsense, unless you consider Jesus Christ as just a man in history instead of Logos (Law) of God? The answer, English (dog-Latin) has no soul.

Maxx

sorry for the type os eyes are getting fuzzy.
My friend works in a church playing music and she said that ALL churches, regardless of denomination, these so called “universalist” churches receive the same “lectionaries” meaning specific chapter and verse on which to base their sermons on Sunday mornngs. I’m looking thru their hymnals, and they are quoting Ignatius Loyola which tells me the judeo-catholic church is controlling all sermon content and avoiding the controversial content of the KJV.
My one goombah friend said he would go to a sermon at one church, go to another church and hear the same sermon. I wasn’t sure how this was being done. I think most “Christian” colleges are Jesuit controlled.

MikeV

Clint have not watched it yet but read the idiot fan-boy comments, everyones looking Yes to label but to also call out the fucking “agents”, my response is the best “agents: are the ignorant assholes diminishing information and corrupting the acceptance by others, simply because it doesnt mesh with their limited perspectives. “Eric” funny because one the best authorities is Eric John Phelps on the Jesuits, him and Micheal Collins Piper debated about which came first the Jesuits or the Zionists many years ago, fact is doesn’t matter their all factions of Masonic orders rooted in Pagan/Judiasm at their core.
Great series I just re-listened to, check out Bill Cooper’s 5 part “Scarlet and the Beast” shows #457-461 their on Youtube.

PS – do the Gnostic Mystics get a crystal ball or that a different order?

1. A seed-plant; ground where seed is sown for producing plants for transplantation…. furnishing matter for the formation of animal or vegetable bodies…. 4. [A] Source of propagation…. –the continuance or multiplication of the kind by generation or successive production.