Proven by thousands of temperature datasets, the earth’s climate fluctuated cyclically in the past, and there’s an overwhelming body of evidence showing a close correlation with solar activity and other powerful natural factors. If the IPCC had truly examined past temperature developments and compared them to solar data, they’d have seen there is something remarkable there.

Yet in the IPCC AR5, Working Group 1 takes only a cursory look at solar activity and its possible impacts on climate in IPCC AR5 before simply dismissing the sun altogether. The Earth’s sole supplier of energy, the sun, and all its dynamism, in fact gets only a couple of pages in a 2200-page report, about 0.1%. That alone is a monumental scandal. It’s incompetence and negligence on the grandest of scales.

This will certainly go down in the books as one of the greatest scientific debacles of human history.

If the IPCC had directed the same energy and resources to make the sun and natural factors the culprit for climate change as it has with CO2, they’d certainly have a far more convincing case today,and many of the questions it claims are still open would be closed. But obviously the IPCC’s sole intent is to frame mankind and its CO2 emissions as the culprit for something that stopped happening 16 years ago. This is fraud, not science.

The IPCC took the same negligent approach with sea levels: dismissing non-alarmist science in favor of nutty, doomsday scenarios.

I spent half a day searching for papers that provide evidence of a significant impact on climate by the sun and natural factors, and another full day sorting through them. I limited the scope of the search to 2008 – 2012, i.e. papers since the last IPCC report. There are many more papers of course prior to 2008.

What follows is a list of papers I found in just a few hours that the IPCC should have taken a much closer look at instead of just dismissing. The list of course is not complete.

65. Temperature prognosis based on long sunspot cycle 23, Solheim et al, 05/2011, read more here. “…We find that for the Norwegian local stations investigated that 30-90% of the temperature increase in this period may be attributed to the Sun. For the average of 60 European stations we find !60% and globally (HadCRUT3) 50%.”

84. Why Hasn’t Earth Warmed as Much as Expected?, Schwartz et al, 05/2010: read more here. “…The observed increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST) over the industrial era is less than 40% of that expected from observed increases in long-lived greenhouse gases…”

Thank you sir for this great treasure trove list of solar climate papers. I see some favorites in this list… You just saved me a lot of time!!

The real flat-earthers have more than doubled-down on their absurd notion that a paltry percentage of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere has more power to influence daily weather and hence climate than the protons, electrons, and photons Earth is immersed in from the sun, solar system, galaxy, and universe.

The real climate tipping point is right around the corner – the day when a majority of scientists see that Earth weather patterns and climate are ruled by electric and magnetic mechanisms caused by outside forcing from solar, lunar, and cosmic sources. I think an electric and magnetic weather effect climate paradigm is inevitably going to replace failed greenhouse gas effect climate theories.

[…] causes of climate change and misattributes natural climate change to greenhouse gas emissions. Here is a list of 123 peer-reviewed papers published from 2008 to 2012 on the solar influence on climate […]