Dipersilakan untuk Like Facebook Page T. Besi

Search Malaysiawaves

Monday, May 11, 2009

The BN will file an appeal with the Courts of Appeals tommorow and they will apply for a stay of execution. That means, Nizar may not be the MB anymore in the nxt 19 hours.

We must never forget that the same Federal Court five-member panel that overturned Zambery and his exco's suspension, was headed by Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, the Appeals Court President.

There's very little justice we can expect from our judges, the higher they go. And, just like the way Federal Court handled the Zambery + Exco's suspension. Can we expect anything different from the Court of Appeals this time around?

I DON'T THINK SO. Our judges are appointed by a drunk lawyer who is stupid enough to have his boasting be recorded.

Then, what is so great about them?

Lastly, before anyone start calling me a Monkey's uncle, u may want to investigate where the phrase comes from.

It is an idiom commonly used by Americans. A detailed explanation of the saying can be read here.

Allow me to quote the explanation:

I'll be a Monkey's Uncle.

Definition: Expression of disbelief.

Origin Pig Players were certainly creative on this one. I particularly enjoyed rnf850’s story about stodgy Winston or Winny as he hated to be called and the story about the demise of Felix DeMont and his love for his only friend Albert the monkey submitted by warpt_princess brought a tear to my eye.

But the truth of the matter is that the origin of this phrase has more to do with scientific inquiry than with a monkey being part of the family. In 1871 Darwin published the Decent of Man outlining his theory of evolution, sparking controversy that continues today. It seems Darwin’s scribblings not only added yet another excuse to snipe and name call, but also contributed to our English lexicon. I’ll be a monkey’s uncle was originally a sarcastic remark made by non-believers of Darwinism.

27 comments:

The next course of action is to bring Hee Yit Foong to court for her illegal usurpation of the Speaker's position. The fact that Hee cites Article 36(A) without understanding its contents shows how worthless Hee Yit Foong has become.

Pray tell, how did Hee Yit Foong have the power to convene a mini dewan and assume the position of speaker when Sivakumar was still the Speaker of the House, Sivakumar was not ordered by any court of law to relinquish his position and by the very fact that Sivakumar at the time was still physically occupying the Speaker's chair. So on what constitutional basis did Hee Yit Foong claim her power to usurped the Speaker and pass motions in the state assembly?

The entire proceedings of the state assembly starting from Hee Yit Foong's illegal act has rendered subsequent events in the state assembly as null and void. And Hee Yit Foong had better learn to shut up fast and stop provoking the rakyat.

Article 36(a):“During the absence of the speaker from a sitting of the legislative assembly, such members as may be determined by the rules of procedure (standing orders) of the assembly, shall act as speaker"

Hee Yit Foong, when you took power illegally the Speaker was physically present not "absent" as Article 36(a) states. It is you Hee Yit Foong that has gone against the Perak State Constitution and for your earlier betrayal of Jelapang voters, your serial lies on your sickness and pepper spray, and your constant provocations against the peoples of Malaysia...we hereby demand that you resign with immediate effect as the ADUN of Jelapang. You can go and contest in Pekan, then maybe you would have a chance of winning!

I highly suggest Pakatan Rakyat immediately launch legal proceedings against Hee Yit Foong to stop BN from convening an illegal vote of no confidence. Haste is required, time is running short!

I think people should not be too quick to think that the judge in question is on the people's side. For all we know the judge may have been following orders from opposing camps (cough cough SIL), or they could be doing wayang kulit to make us think he is free and fair and then later use the same judge to send Anwar to jail.

Then at that time UMNO will paint us a hypocrites for only saying the judge is fair when his decisions are for us and unfair when against us. Please be aware of the many dirty tricks employed by UMNO.

One swallow does not make a summer. I will reserve judgement on the judiciary until I see a clear pattern of neutrality and not base it on a one-off case.

BN trying to convene an illegal sitting of the state assembly officiated by the illegal speaker Ganesan. FRU needed to block the state assembly from the people whom the state assembly is supposed to serve.

Since Zambry has now been declared the illegal MB, therefore the entire May 7 State Assembly was also illegal because the state assembly was not called by the Speaker of the House but cloaked as a royal emergency sitting approved by the Sultan of Perak on advice of the MB of Perak.

And since the MB of Perak has been declared illegal, logic dictates that the emergency sitting of the state assembly was also illegal. This means that all motions passed in the House on May 7, 2009 is illegal. Sivakumar is still the legal Speaker of the House. Any motion has to be approved by the Speaker.

So it’s basically game over for BN but of course you didn’t think that BN will just sit down and let Perak slip from their grasp again do you? So they have deployed the FRU and possibly thousands more police and goons to Perak. The final showdown is yet to be witnessed.

I agree with monkey's uncle but PR have the slightest reason to celebrate for short while as of now.

Dear PR Leaders and PR supporters,

Congratulations to DS Nijar and PR Leaders for they who won the 1st half battle of the constitutional issues but don't be too carried away for this moment.

UM-No/BN (Najis/Zombie) not going to just let off the current political developments of the court ruling as they would appeal soon. It might be a strategy of getting the Rakyat thought that the judiciary commisssion was acting justifiably in the 1st half of this battle but on the 2nd half, the court may ruled otherwise. Be reminded that this agency (JC) is still the UM-No/BN horse.

Once this happen, PR will have a major set back and cry fouls of the JC's integrity and therefore any objections by PR of the court ruling that cannot be accepted by PR would be seen as uncivilised or "KIASU" !! (The 1st half UM-No/BN can accept court ruling but 2nd half court ruling cannot be accepted by PR).

PR just have to be very careful and strategizing the next course of action.Anyway, as supporter of PR, I still believe in people's power and the best solutions to end the whole episode is to dissolved the assembly and go for a fresh elction.

I think this time it's gonna be true and good for PR. But the DUN won't be dissolved. Instead the 3 frogs Jamal, Othman and Hee are being made to resign "voluntarily" and PR leaders will agree to have PRKecil at these 3 DUNs only which BN guarantees its lost. Give-face-to-BN way out which otherwise will lose 59-0. Probably......