Fact: the word “child” nor “toddler” can be found at all in the Heller decision. It was about whether a 66 year old security guard was allowed to keep a firearm in the home and ready for self-defense. Hillary Clinton has said she is opposed to the Heller decision. When she claims that this is about the children, she is out-and-out lying.

The truth doesn’t matter any more in politics than it does in court. IT matters who can be swung to your side for enough time to cast a vote. branding the restrictions DC had and some places still have despite heller as toddler protection is sheer brilliance and the fact that someone didn’t have a coached counter to that is sheer stupidity.

I don’t know why everyone is surprised. The coordination between Clinton and anti-gun organizations goes back decades. Remember the 2000 Million Mom March, supposedly organized by a regular mom? Started by a woman named Donna Dees-Thomases, sister-in-law to Susan Thomases, who happen to be Hillary Clinton’s personal attorney at the time. I’m *SURE* that’s purely coincidence.

“Child” or “children” appear a half dozen times, in Breyer’s dissent. Of course, anyone with a modicum of sense knows that the dissenting arguments are not the decision, and have no relevance other than to document arguments against the decision.

Now, Hillary, being a lawyer, knows all this. She’s counting on the American people NOT knowing it so that she can perpetrate her lie. Unfortunately, for the most part, she’s not wrong.