A Universe of Anti-American
Treachery, concealed amid Many, Many Layers of Lies.

Purposeful mal-education
from academia, treacherous disinformation from the media and political lies of
politicians have stacked the deck against Truth in the minds of the American
voters. When bold lies permeate text
books from elementary school through advanced universities, and when every
source of journalism has a devious agenda, and when popular music, art, drama
and comedy openly attacks Truth and props up falsehood, it’s hard to blame the
contemporary American voter for voting Liberty out of existence. He simply doesn’t know what he’s really
doing. He has been made into a fool.

Religious layers of
lies.

The World, which is to say,
Satan, insists that God does not exist.
Indeed, even that Satan does not exist.
Satan is never happier than when people do not even believe that evil
exists. There is no good; there is no
evil; there is no sin; there is nothing to feel guilty about. All of those Church-goers and their preachers
are religious whackos and ignorant, unscientific and not very bright people who
need our sympathy. But they bear close
watching, because they may oppose the purely scientific agenda to save the
planet and the universe and nature itself from man. This is especially true of religious man, who
may pose a threat to the planet and the universe and nature itself.

When one has been educated
and raised on this lie he doesn’t recognize that it is stating that everything
is natural except man, who is somehow outside of nature, and therefore is in
need of being controlled. Controlled by
whom? By other men, who somehow became
superior, if not natural, and therefore “authorized” to control the activities
and lives of all other men. (It’s
scientific; don’t question it.)

The very minute the Creator
was denied, men began to try to put themselves in charge of creation. This lie says that matter – material itself –
is all there is, all there ever was, and that it always was and always will
be. Somehow life scientifically emerged
from matter, and then scientifically “evolved” to eventually produce man, who
is now no longer natural. See?

This is, of course, pure
crap; but many, many generations have been educated in this crap, and it is now
inculcated into the thinking of a major segment of the whole culture. It doesn’t matter so much that this education
didn’t “take” with a lot of people – what matters is that it “took” with a lot
of people, to the detriment of American society.

Note, first of all, that
before any denominations of Christianity existed, there was only one Christian
religion, which worshiped Jesus Christ as the Second Person of the Holy Trinity
of the one and only Triune God. After
the Reformation, there were multiple denominations of Christianity, all
associated with nations and rulers. It
was in the USA,
after the American nation was “Constituted” that the religion of Christianity,
in all of its diverse denominations, was treated as “Our American Religion” as
Benjamin Franklin put it.

“It can not be emphasized
too strongly or too often that this great nation of ours was founded, not by
religionists, but by Christians … not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus
Christ.” –Patrick Henry.

While the most devout among
believing Americans pay most attention to matters of evangelization and/or
ecumenism, and discuss, analyze, debate and argue over which denomination is
the true faith, many of them miss the point that the new ascendant denomination
in America
is Secularism, which is a determined enemy of all faith in general and
Christianity in particular. There is
nothing neutral about Secularism; it is a political and legal movement aimed at
the destruction of Christian faith, ostensibly for the good of the planet. The first goal of the Secularism movement is
to eliminate all Christian influence and participation in politics, government
and law.

Most people don’t know that;
they haven’t even thought about it. In
opposing Christianity as any kind of authority, Secularism opposes Christian
representation in government, and thus Secularism opposes the very idea of representative
government itself.

Secularism opposes
Christianity as being unscientific, thereby revealing its own ignorance of
material science, which can only address matter. God is not mere matter, and He may not be
scientifically studied. Secularism
therefore attacks the Bible, which it can see and feel and touch. And it ridicules the various stories in
Genesis and elsewhere, particularly miracles, as being “obviously”
un-scientific.

Most who hold these ideas
came to them via mal-education and disinformation; but some are more malevolent
manipulators of ideas. That is, after
all, how all the mal-education and the disinformation programs began.

National layers of
lies.

These are the lies about the
nature of America as founded
and constituted; we will talk about the falsified history of America
later. The educational and journalistic
liars here would tightly link American nationalism
to the terrible forms of nationalism that arose in Europe
in the 20th century. I’m
speaking of the Fascism of Spain and Italy, the National Socialism of
Germany, and the “International” Communism of Russia. All were born of and inspired by the writings
of Karl Marx. Once the German variant
broke the secret pact it had with the Russian variant and invaded Russia, Marxist
International Communism and the various forms of Marxist Nationalism or
National Socialism became open enemies instead of secret allies.

Since that split, the world
of convinced Marxist idealogues – which includes American academia, the
Democrat Party and American journalism – divides the whole world, politically
speaking, into Right versus Left, with Right being Nationalism of some form,
and Left being Internationalism, which is to say, Communism. And they put America in the Right column,
because of American nationalistic pride, interpreted as nationalism as it existed in the Marxist nations.

And that is a lie.

American nationalism is a
completely different animal than that of Franco’s Spain,
or Mussolini’s Italy, or
Hitler’s Germany, or even
Lenin’s Russia.

Every single one of these
was a government of men; each example was ruled by dictatorial power exercised
with an iron fist. The government was
the law, and the government was ruled by one strong man. No exceptions. They may have looked a little different from
each other, but they were all the same.
Their public claims of future utopia or the betterment of man or the
betterment of their own population were all, always, false. When you strip away
the public picture they painted of themselves, each Marxist-inspired nation was
an absolute dictatorship, pure and simple.
Of course, Marx’s Communist Utopia was and is and will always be quite
impossible. Of course, Hitler’s dream of
a purified race enslaving the rest of the world was the ranting of a madman. Economically and socially, all of these
“Socialisms” were the same: rigidly controlled markets, economies and
populations, whether they called themselves nationalist or
internationalist.

International Communism is,
in truth, Socialism; real Communism has never existed and cannot exist, because it is quite impossible. National Socialism is, in truth,
Socialism. All twentieth century forms
of Socialism were inspired by Marxism, and all involved dictatorial rule by
man. Current “Democratic Socialist
Republics” and similar governments of Europe
and elsewhere are purposely being guided toward economic failure, social
breakdown and eventual revolution ending in dictatorship, however long that may take.

America, however, is a nation of laws, and not just of
men. The government is not the law; no
man is the law; no Party is the law; the law is a written in a fixed legal
document, which stands separate from man.
In America,
the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and every man, including the
President, is subject to it. All men,
including the President, stand equal before the law. The government is not the law; the
Constitution is the law, and even the government is subject to the law.

Here, the Constitution is a
fixed legal document, written in English, that says very specific legal
things. It is the supreme law of the
land, and no other law from any source may be superimposed above it. The Constitution describes the organization
of the government and provides its operating rules, its limitations on
authority, and the legal rights of the American citizens.

We Americans are free to
move about and make our way as we see fit; we protect the Constitution, and the
Constitution protects us. The USA is the
first government ever formed for the protection of the citizenry from its own
government. The Declaration of
Independence fixed forever the very purpose for the American government – to
protect the God-given Natural Rights
of citizens to equality before the law, life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness.

Thus the unique American national pride represents a
completely new form of nationalism,
if you want to call it that. Marxist
governments – which is to say, Fascist, Nazi and Communist – all involved a
people being ruled by a man. But here in
America
it is different, for we are Americans, and we will not be ruled by any
man.

America is a land of free individual operators; that is what
she was conceived and founded to be, and there are still more than enough of us
around who will never be herded into any social collective.

We will have no worldly
rulers.

Moral layers of
lies.

American morality has been,
from the birth of the nation, the morality that springs from the
Judeo-Christian religion. In it’s
simplest form, the Judeo-Christian religious rules for the living of life are
broken down into two areas:

Love of God

Love of Neighbor

Love of God
springs from the first group of Commandments of God dealing with man’s
relationship with God; recognition of His supremacy, recognition of any other
gods, rules of His Sabbath and so forth.
These Commandments are richly elaborated upon in the field of Theology, and it is here that the
divergent denominations of Christianity and various strains of Judaism differ
from each other. It is differing views
on Scriptural points and historical teaching that make denominations.

Love of Neighbor springs from the second group of Commandments of God dealing with man’s
relationship with his fellow man, which form the nucleus of the field of Morality, and it is here that Americans
of various Judeo-Christian teachings or interpretations find common
ground. These are the Commandments that
tell us how to behave and get along with each other.

Now, Christians and Jews,
and even different denominations of Christians, may differ so radically in theology as to point the finger of
heresy at each other; and that’s OK, because our strong theological views are
tempered and held back by our common morality,
which makes of us reasonable and decent men capable of self control. However radical our theological differences
may be, we have this common morality that binds us together and enables us to
do business together and deal with each other properly as neighbors. Let’s look at these moral Commandments.

Implicit in Honor Thy father and Thy
mother is the sacredness of the normative family, and the presumptive right
of parents to first authority over their own children, and to special social
protections for the family.

Implicit in Thou shalt not kill is
the inalienable right of all innocent human beings to continue to live.

Implicit in Thou shalt not commit
adultery is the sanctity and inviolability and protected nature of the
marriage covenant, and, again, the sanctity and protected nature of the family.

Implicit in Thou shalt not steal is
the inalienable right to private property: the right of an individual to
actually own something.

Implicit in Thou shalt not bear false
witness is the protected and sacred nature of truth, and the moral
requirement to protect it and to profess it fully and without distortion.

Implicit in Thou shalt not covet is,
again, the sanctity of marriage, and, again, the protected right to own private
property.

This forms the core of our American
ethos. This is how we tell right from
wrong. This is what makes of us, as
Tocqueville described us, a “good people.”
This is at the core of our civil law, and it underlies all
representative law.

Secularism
has been actively attacking all Truth and advancing falsehood among men since
the Garden of Eden. It may have made
its greatest advances with the birth and growth of Marxism in its many forms. Here in America Marxism advances under the
sly title of Progressivism, but it
can change course on a dime, and it could quite suddenly transform back into
traditional Marxist violent revolution at any random opportunity. It constantly works to make such opportunities.

Lucifer asked the woman, Did God say you may not eat of the fruit of
the trees in the Garden? which was a leading question, intending to lead
the woman into believing God said something He did not say, since God forbade
only one tree in the garden. Then, when
the woman didn’t follow his lead, he lied, saying You will not die, making God to be a liar, and You will be like gods, knowing good and evil.

And that is the ultimate
temptation of Satan: for men to be like gods.
Satan himself wanted to be like God, and above God; he tempts men to
want to become lesser gods. The whole
secular movement is to do away with God, to put man in God’s place as custodian
and controller of all human society, of nature, of the earth, and of the whole
universe. To plant the seed in your mind
that says This world would be so much
better If only I were in charge of it.

This is the exact opposite
of humility. It is the thinking of the
revolutionary and the would-be ruler; of one who would be like God.

Marxism and subsets of
Marxism such as Progressivism and the UN’s Agenda
21 are rapidly promoting lies and accelerating secularism throughout the
world, and in America,
at warp speed. And what is the morality
underlying Marxism? Well, there isn’t
any. Marxism is immoral. Marxism is Godless, and ungodly; Marxism was
thoroughly secularized before it became Marxism. I have spoken elsewhere in this site of a
Marxist ethos of sorts, which was begun by Satan, with inputs from Machiavelli,
Hegel, Marx, Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Mao and others. It is a progressive sort of ethos, with
steps. First, there is

The ends justify the means

which, once adopted, will
progress to

You can’t make an omelet
without breaking eggs

which, once adopted, will
progress to

Shut up and get on the
cattle car.

History proves it. Untold millions were killed outright,
collectivized into industrial communes, labor camps, farm communes, prison
gulags and even death camps, just because someone thought This world would be so much better If only I were in charge of it.

Today, in America, this kind
of guiding ethos, whether you want to call it Marxism, progressivism,
collectivism, redistributionism, global villageism, new world orderism, agenda
21-ism, or whateverism, is in
absolute control of the Democrat Party, education, upper academia, journalism,
show business and pop culture, and a significant fraction – the controlling
fraction – of even the Republican Party.

Know this first: the current
American leadership does not believe in God, or opposes God. All of the politicians, journalists,
teachers, respected academics, etc., who constitute or support the current
regime could not possibly be believers and followers of God. They play-act at religious belief for purely
political and deceptive purposes only, to fool the public. To deceive us. No true believer could champion the agendas
they champion, sponsor the programs they sponsor, or defend the subjects they
defend. They have become deceivers and
liars. Some of them deceive even
themselves with their lies. They know
what they say is a lie, and they say it anyway, for the good of the planet or
something – the ends justify the means. But the whole larger premise, about which
they lie, is itself a lie.

Some of them erroneously
believe that they are advancing mankind, or nature, or something worldly; but
what they are advancing is the larger original agenda of pure falsehood.

They don’t know right from
wrong. And they look down their noses at
us.

They have become evil, and some
of them don’t even know it.

The New Freedom. In the new secularized view,
God is no more, and so God-related morality is no more. In the previous Godly view, freedom meant
freedom from sin and freedom from enslavement to this world. In the previous Godly American national view,
freedom meant the liberty that was enshrined
in the Declaration of Independence, with a few other specific rights firmly
established in the Constitution. But
now, in secularized America,
freedom means something else, and it certainly looks like the old fashioned
enslavement to the world that Judeo-Christian religion was supposed to lift man
out of.

Younger generations talk of
free sex; many think they have a “right” to recreational use of illegal drugs,
and Libertarians agree with them. The
Court has unconstitutionally established a new “right” to unlimited abortion,
and many consider that to be such an important right that any interference with
it is interference with freedom. We hear
demands for freedom of homosexual marriage in civil law, and in Churches. Now, thanks to the media, since the last
election campaigns many think they have a right to free, government-funded
contraception, and any opposition to that right is seen to be an attack on
freedom. The UN has a list of citizen
rights it seeks to impose upon the world that is virtually unlimited, and is
based upon Marxist collectivism and redistribution, meaning equality of
stuff. Equality of everything.

Without God, everything has
to be redefined. We have rights and
wrongs defined for us by academics, scientists, psychologists, lawyers, the
courts, the news media, celebrity, various politicians and pundits, and nobody
even looks at anything that is supposed to be fixed and stable, like Scripture,
or our Constitution. Whatever you do, do
not consult any priest, minister or rabbi, and do not refer back to the
writings of the Founding Fathers.

Here’s
the interesting thing about the new American morality: generations who have
been mal-educated and propagandized into believing that they are special, the
world revolves around them and they have a right to everything and anything,
including all kinds of drugs and substances, will wind up running afoul of the
law. Increasing crime rates induce
government to hire more cops to crack down on crime. It’s a never ending cycle that ends up in a
virtual police state, with huge
armies of cops in constant contact with ever more selfist, selfish,
self-centered and sociopathic citizens.

A police state is the opposite of a free state.
They don’t even see it coming, as they push for more and more new kinds
of freedom.

When God was in charge of
our lives everything was a lot more simple and straightforward.

Psychological layers of
lies.

The root, cornerstone, foundation
block and whole central point of modern psycho analysis, psycho therapy and
related psychologies and psychiatric treatment is the theoretical subconscious mind. I submit that the subconscious mind not only
cannot be studied or manipulated or “healed” of anything, but it cannot even be
observed; indeed, it cannot even be detected. I could make the exact same statement about
the repressed memory. Subconscious minds and repressed memories are
not things that may be laid out on the table to be examined by peers, or by anyone.
The very idea that anyone, including Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung, could
“scientifically” know anything at all about their own or anyone else’s
subconscious mind or repressed memory is simply ludicrous.

The whole subject is a lie. Through the power of suggestion the founders
of this whole genre of pseudo-science, and past and current practitioners, have
induced memories of events that never occurred into the minds of “patients”
much as the carnival hypnotist gets the sweet, dignified little old lady to
bark like a seal.

But the whole world has
bought into it. Courts have sent people
to prison because of “crimes” discovered in someone’s previously repressed
memory, with no other evidence at all, other than the expert testimony of a
psycho therapist. Such testimony would,
if the truth were known, be the equivalent of the testimony of a carnival
huckster.

Psychology today is a
secularizing influence on society. It
seeks to make people feel good about themselves, to get them to become more
self centered. It seeks to strip away
inhibitions and free the patient from guilt; to have them not feel guilty about
anything. It therefore denies sin, and
evil. The idea of sin is inhibiting and
guilt-inducing, and psychology seeks to eliminate inhibition and feelings of
guilt.

I’m sure this pleases Satan
to no end.

Scientific layers of
lies.

It was not Charles Darwin,
but his peers, who turned Darwinism, which began life as an untested
hypothesis, into a gigantic lie. It was
never tested and never verified; it was never even subjected to the scientific
method. It was simply embraced and
elevated to the level of a scientific theory, with absolutely nothing
supporting it, other than popular consensus.

Thomas Henry Huxley, a contemporary
and peer of Darwin, who might have invented the
religion of agnosticism (he was the first to use the term, describing himself,)
became famous as “Darwin’s
Bulldog” because of his ferocious defense of Darwinism. From the fossil record, Huxley knew full well
that Darwinian “gradualism” was quite impossible, but he championed the overall
hypothesis anyway, because it provided a good path to further the agenda of
secularism. His strongest (and only) supporting
argument for Darwinism was the loud challenge “What’s your alternative
theory?!!!” to which the response was always stunned silence; most men of
science, already, were too
embarrassed to publicly associate any real world phenomena with God, in the
newly “enlightened” field of science.
What might their peers think of them?
Much of academia and the whole field of material science had already
undergone quite a religious cleansing by that time, with more to come as time
went on.

Huxley invented biogenesis, the “science” of how
one-cell life forms evolve into other life forms, and abiogenesis, the
“science” of how life itself originated and actually came to be alive. Like any evolutionary event, in which a new
species begins life, capable of reproducing within itself but no longer capable
of reproducing or interbreeding with its parent species, no event of biogenesis
or abiogenesis has ever been so much as observed, and not from lack of
experiment. No speciation event has ever
been observed, or ever recorded in the fossil record. In all of world history, the only place any
speciation event every happened was in the mind of Darwin, and other Darwinians. In all of world history the only place any
biogenesis or abiogenesis event ever happened was in the mind of Huxley or any
of his disciples. It doesn’t matter. All of
this is formally taught as scientific fact today, and that there are no other viable
alternative possibilities. People believe it.

God does not exist has been established as a scientific fact in the hearts, minds and
souls of men of science. Therefore,
evolution of species, biogenesis and abiogenisis must be true, simply because
there is no alternative strictly scientific theory. See?

Acceptance of the new
religion of Darwinism provided a great foundation stone, and a springboard from
which to advance secularism and lead mankind into whole new areas of
falsehood. (That foundation stone is
really just sand; but note well how Darwinism still stands strong everywhere, simplybecause it is not and has never been opposed.)

Today we are all told that
the world is running out of fossil fuels (a lie), that burning fossil fuels is
destroying the planet and modifying the climate (a lie), that man is causing
climate change (a lie), that man can change the climate for the better (a lie),
that some species or other may go extinct if not protected (so what?), that
every single event of extinction harms man (a lie), that man is a cancer on the
earth (a lie), that food production is going down (a lie), that man is
overpopulating the earth (a lie), and even that the planet would be better off
without man (a lie).

Note that every government
action to alleviate any of these lies involves gigantic expenditures of
treasure, radical infringements on the liberty of citizens to act in their own
self interest, and radical growth of the government and increase in government
power over the citizenry. All of these
lies, and many more, are perfectly aligned with, number one, the goals of
secularism, and number two, the goals of Marxism, which are to bring God down
and elevate the world in the estimation of man, and to bring down
Constitutional America and replace the rule of law with absolute rule by
man. Which is to say, the end of
liberty.

Economic layers of
lies.

I’m sure you have heard the old
saying there ain’t no free lunch. But I’m not so sure all of us understand that
there ain’t no free money. Multiple generations of the new Marxist
created “dependent class” of Americans, brought into being by Marxist-Democrat
sponsored government entitlement programs, have learned to game the system and make their living by applying for various kinds
of government grants, food stamps, welfare, disability, etc., in a seemingly
never ending train of government programs.
There are government programs that pay you to start a business, run it
until it goes bankrupt, and then start another one. Many, many generations of single parent (mom)
families exist in the now long established tradition of being paid by the
government to have more illegitimate babies.
Many of these use prostitution to supplement their government income
between pregnancies. Need some money,
sell yourself for cash. Get pregnant
again, get another raise. Or, get a job
with the government and get higher pay and better benefits than your private
sector contemporaries, and become a government paid teacher or petty bureaucrat
of some kind.

If you ask any recipient of
any of this government largess or government worker pay where they think all that
money comes from, for the most part, they won’t know. Just from the government. The government just has money. They have no idea where the government gets
it.

Under this regime the
American government is now spending well over a trillion dollars more than we
take in in taxes, every single year. The
spending exceeds the income by more than a trillion dollars every year. And the Marxist-Democrat answer to this
problem is, always, that they need to increase taxes. They need to squeeze blood out of a
turnip. The new underclass needs to be fed,
and that underclass is now a political force to be reckoned with. They will always vote Marxist-Democrat.

They have no idea what will
happen to them when the economic system fails, the government support system
collapses, and all of their government payments suddenly stop, and even
government worker pay stops. They don’t
even see it coming. They have been
raised and educated and trained to be dependents, and they don’t know how to
not be dependents. They – at least some
of them – may be incapable of becoming independent thinkers. After all, the dependent class pays no taxes,
and they are told by the Marxist media, the Marxist Democrats and the Marxist
regime that you are not paying your fair share.
And that’s what they believe. And
that’s how they will vote.

They don’t even see it
coming.

History related layers of
lies.

Marx’s great masterpiece,
the Communist Manifesto, contained a truly ingenuous albeit evil and false revision
of history, which would become the foundation for instigating class warfare everywhere. It represents the masterfully divisive idea
of:

Falsely establishing bogus “classes” of
citizens;

Alienating and angering these bogus classes
against each other;

Falsely promising to save the “underclass” from
exploitation by the “overclass.”

Marx’s Manifesto successfully set employees against their own employers,
the poor against the rich, the owners of less property against those with more
property, the less successful against the more successful, and succeeded in the
Communist organizing of the first labor unions, with a view toward eventual
revolution. The year it was published it
actually inspired some 50 violent revolutions in Europe,
none of which succeeded, but all of which gained committed new followers of
Marxism.

The bitter seed of
alienation, divisiveness and class envy was planted. The most ingenuous part of the Manifesto is that it creates a bogus
problem and then provides a bogus solution, and the solution favors the lower
invented classes over the upper ones; it’s a numbers game. There are always more workers than bosses;
there are always more poor than rich; therefore, even during periods when
popular revolutionary takeover is not yet possible, Marxists politicians will
likely get more votes, gain political power, and purposely prod the system
toward failure and eventual complete takeover, whether by revolution, or – God
help us – by free election.

Since Marxism completed its
“long march” through American teaching institutions, world history and our own
American history have been being continuously rewritten to display Western
Civilization in general and America
in particular falsely colored by the Marxist class exploitation paint
brush. All historical Western colonizing
was bad and exploitative; nothing good ever came out of any of it. All (and only) Westerners were and are
racist; no one else on earth was ever (or is) racist. Only evil “Capitalists” are greedy; no one
else on earth is greedy; especially not any Marxist dictators or any Socialist
politicians. Greed itself is centered in
the “system” of Capitalism. It was
Westerners (not Moslems) who invented the slave trade.

Similar social wedges have
been driven between the sexes, between parent and child, between homosexuals
and heterosexuals, between drivers of big cars and small cars, between those
who believe the new twinky florescent bulbs will save the planet and those who
prefer the semi-illegal incandescent bulbs, between those who recycle and those
who don’t – the list is now endless. “Political
Correctness” is even modifying the public use of the English language. Marxism even seeks to control how we dare to
speak in public.

Children tend to believe
what they are taught in school. Under or
mal-educated citizens tend to believe whatever the media says, if they pay
attention to the news at all. The
schools and the media are thoroughly Marxist, and – here we are.

Political layers of
lies.

The main problem with
conservative politicians, meaning those who most favor America as
founded, and who most strongly support the Declaration of Independence and the
Constitution, is that even they will
not speak the truth boldly and in a straightforward way. They will not call a lie a lie. They will not call a liar a liar. They will not refer to treachery as
treachery. They will avoid the word
treason at all costs. It wouldn’t be good politics. They will not even identify an obviously
anti-American opponent as an anti-American, an opponent of the American
Constitution and a clear-cut, died-in-the-wool Marxist. No; it wouldn’t be nice.

They use weasel-words, like disingenuous, or untrue, or mistaken. They identify Comrade Obama, peace be upon
him, as a nice guy, a good father, a family man, decent and all that; but just
wrong in his policies, or maybe just in over his head. Those of them who are not really some variant
of Marxist in disguise have been fooled by their highly paid consultants into
thinking that’s the only way to win elections in America. Really?
When was the last time any of those consultants was right about
anything?

Obama is not a nice
guy. He has our Constitution in his gun
sights. He is a menace to America and to
the world.

The leadership of the
Republican Party is simply disgusting.
Over time it becomes more and more difficult to tell the difference
between them and the Democrat Party, which went completely Marxist and
anti-Constitutional America
long ago. They constantly talk of
seeking bi-partisan solutions, of reaching across the aisle, of compromising
with the opposition.

That implies that they
either do not know who the opposition is, or, they are in cahoots with the
opposition. The opposition seeks to
bring Constitutional America down. Why
would any American in his right mind want to cooperate in or compromise in any
way with that clear and obvious mission?

What would a negotiated
compromise with Satan bring you to?

Comrade Obama, peace be upon
him, and the leadership of his Party, all having sworn in their oaths of office
to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and
domestic, violate the Constitution, ignore the Constitution, bypass the
Constitution, and work assiduously in direct opposition to the Constitution, all
to the loud praise, applause, celebration and congratulations of the media, and
no one, anywhere, even thinks to use the word traitor. Oh, heavens
no. That would be extreme.

The Republican Party
leadership, which is supposed to represent the opposition, all of whom have
sworn in their oaths of office to protect and defend the Constitution against
all enemies foreign and domestic, takes turns at the microphones explaining how
we need to cut entitlements, but then express heartfelt support for a federal
level “Safety Net” for the true unfortunates.
But, you say, there is no mention of any Safety Net in the Constitution
where the powers of the federal government are limited and enumerated, which is
in Article 1 Section 8; and there is no mention of any federal expenditures for
charity. Well, harrumph’s the RNC, so
what? Neither is Social Security, Welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, CHIP,
Obamaphones or any of the other myriad entitlements the federal government is
currently handing out.

Well that is exactly the freaking problem.

They don’t even see it. The Constitutional limitations on government
authority and power have been being ignored and bypassed ever since Teddy
Roosevelt first attempted it, and Woodrow Wilson first accomplished it. Over the last century, both Democrat and
Republican Congresses and Administrations have done violence to the limitations
in Article 1 Section 8. Multiple
generations of both Parties have participated in increasing the numbers, sizes
and unconstitutional regulating authority of gigantic Unconstitutional federal bureaucracies,
so that now, at this point, having a radical Marxist revolutionary elected to our
highest office, a second time, the
Constitution itself may well be un-salvageable.

And Republican Party
leadership is actively participating in this process. Considering or compromising on amnesty for the
criminal aliens is not beyond them; they actually believe they might gain some
Latino votes from the Democrats by favoring amnesty. It just doesn’t get any dumber than
this. They think they might get some of
the feminist vote away from the Democrats by going wobbly on abortion; they
think they might get some homosexual votes from the Democrats by lightening up
on homosexual marriage.

What can I say?

Long before the 2008
election, indeed long before the primaries, I said that all of the very best
Republican men running for office at that time were women. That remains the case. Current Republican leadership is either
actually a bunch of Democrats masquerading as Republicans, or, they are a bunch
of downright stupid, gutless, chickafied, feminized and politically corrected
nutless wonders.

Now they’re even using Dem
language; they’re promoting raising taxes under the title of increasing
revenues. They claim it won’t really be
raising taxes, because it will be closing loopholes. The word loophole is a Democrat politician’s
word for a legal deduction, such as any business expense, like payroll. What would be the effect of eliminating tax
deductions for expenses? Raising
taxes. Boehner and the rest of the
establishment Republicans have just proved that they can lie just like
Democrats. They’re not raising taxes;
they’re raising revenue, by closing loopholes.
See?

The whole thing is a damnable
lie.

Raising taxes, however you
do it, does not raise revenue; it lowers revenue. The way to raise revenue, meaning
government’s income, is to lower taxes.
This lie has been being repeated so often and for so long that not only
do the mal-educated and the indoctrinated and the propagandized believe it, but
many of the liar politicians who say it have come to believe it. Look up the Laffer Curve if you don’t believe
me.

Laffer’s curve is a
bell-shaped mathematical curve that shows the relationship between a tax rate
and the government revenue it produces.
At the beginning point, where tax is zero, revenue is also zero. At the opposite end, where tax is 100%,
revenue is again zero. When people
cannot keep what they earn, they stop earning it. Why work?
As the tax rate increases from zero, revenues go up, hit some point at
which they begin going down, and eventually hit zero again.

Historical applications of
the Laffer Curve, where certain historic periods of time were plugged into the
model, the general rule seemed to be that maximum revenue peaked at or around
38%, but not perfectly so. It’s not a
perfect predictor, but there is no question that raising taxes beyond some
point will always result in revenues going down. The thing is, income tax is not the only kind
of tax; there are a blue million other kinds of taxes out there, and thus
raising the income tax just 1% might be enough to slow or stop business, even
when the rate is well below the magic 38%.
It is almost a rule; raise tax to lower revenue; cut tax to increase
revenue.

The reason is that when it
stops being profitable for a business to keep running, it will shut down, or it
will cut back, or it will move somewhere where it is still profitable to do
business. Jobs go with it. When employees are laid off they no longer
contribute taxes because they no longer have earnings to tax. The whole tax base shrinks. Conversely, when taxes go down business
becomes more profitable, business expands, more employees are hired, and these
new employees pay taxes; the whole tax base is broadened.

Nevertheless, equating tax
increases with “revenue” increases is such an old and overused Democrat lie
that even the liars themselves have come to believe it. Every time Republicans recommend a tax cut,
Democrats ask “how are you going to pay for it?” It doesn’t have to be paid for; it will pay
for itself. Reducing tax rates increases
government revenue; it has worked every time it has been tried. Raising taxes decreases government revenue;
that, too, has worked every time it has been tried.

We wouldn’t even be talking
about the Laffer Curve and Democrat lies if any political leaders anywhere had
the guts to begin championing the Fair Tax and eliminating all other taxes,
including especially the income tax, and getting back to basics. But no; they won’t even talk about it. Not possible, they say. Let’s just tweak this 70,000 page monstrosity
of a tax code a little more, add a few more pages to it, and lie some more, and
smile for the cameras.

Currently Republicans are in
a lose-lose situation. Whatever happens
in the “fiscal cliff” negotiations, the Republicans will be blamed for it. If we go over the cliff, which is what Obama
wants, Republicans will be blamed for that .
Taxes will go up on everyone.
Then some time down the road, Obama will propose a tax cut for the lower
earners, and he will take credit for cutting taxes, and he will gain votes. His media will help him do that.

Every single thing that
happens – no exceptions – will hurt the economy. Industry will shrink, jobs will be lost, and
new members will be added to the Democrat-dependent entitlement class of
voters.

The Final Layers of
Lies?

As I have said many times
elsewhere, American voters get one and only one opportunity to vote for the
most highly principled candidate in view, who might become the voting public’s
choice, and that one opportunity is in the primary election. Now it appears that we have to study
candidates and then put on blinders and earmuffs and ignore the establishment
types and the Republican leadership, because they will, invariably, do all in
their power to help the Democrats and the Media to destroy the best candidates
before they even get started.

Once we get to a general
election, there are only two choices; if you go for a third, or if you sit it
out, you have, in effect, voted for the opposition. Only one of the two major Parties is going to
win. That’s why I voted for Romney; he
wasn’t my choice candidate, but he was my candidate, and I voted for him. He was running against an Alinskyite, who had
appointed another Alinskyite to be Secretary of State. Alinskyites do what Alinsky said to do: get
into the system and destroy it from the inside.
The whole Alinsky agenda involves putting on the uniform of the enemy,
getting deep inside, and, using deceit and treachery, destroy the system from
within.

Now, some of you took me to
task for supporting a Mormon, of all things.
And some of you had good theological points. But this was not a theological contest, it
was a political one. He wasn’t coming
into my Church, or yours; he was coming into our civil government. If we would consider George Washington,
Thomas Jefferson, and others among the Founders and Framers, to be worthy of
high office, and they were Deists, then why should a Mormon be precluded from legitimate
candidacy? I think the Democrats and
other Marxists – atheists all – succeeded in demonizing Romney in the eyes of
some Christians; some of you have proved that right here in this website.

Romney’s morality is the same as ours. What is the morality of Obama and
company? The ends justify the means; you can’t make an omelet without breaking
eggs; shut up and get on the cattle car.

But, Romney is a heretic, one of you charged.
Mormons are not heretics, any more than Lutherans are heretics, although
Martin Luther was a heretic. Later
followers raised in false traditions are seekers, like us. If they seek the truth in accordance with the
light they are given, in the tradition in which they are raised, they are not
heretics. Joseph Smith might have been a
Protestant heretic, but since he was never a Catholic, I doubt he was ever condemned
by the Church. People raised as Mormon
are, to me, no different than people raised as Lutheran. No one can deny that Romney is a thoroughly moral,
decent and upstanding man, as are most Mormons.

My problem with Romney has
nothing to do with his religion; my problem with him is that he is just another
big government progressive. But, you
see, his opponent was and is a radical Marxist revolutionary who is out to
bring America
down, and to promote world instability.
He cooperates with the UN Agenda 21, and he participates in George
Soros’ project of “Managed Decline” of the US dollar and of the US economy, and
of the world economy. Obama is a direct
enemy of the American Constitution.

If you didn’t vote for
Romney, you helped put Obama back in office, and you should be ashamed.

Obama means to bring the
American economy down, and he shouldn’t need another whole term in office to do
it.

We cannot pay back the debt
he is putting us in. We will wind up in
default somewhere down the line, or, if we simply print money to pay it off,
then we will destroy the value of the dollar and send the USA and the whole
world into truly radical depression. Preventing
all that will mean cooperating in Soros’ managed
decline.

Republicans and Democrats
will be forced to cooperate in the “managed” economic decline, in which much
existing wealth will be destroyed. It’s already going on. The goal is not what Marxism promises, which
is equality in wealth; it will be a destruction of wealth and property in the
upper and middle classes. The currently
poor will remain poor. (Redistribution
always was a lie.) We will become more
“equal” not by lifting the lower class, but by lowering the upper class. Eventually, the lower class will be
completely cut off from all entitlements and benefits, and then they’ll learn
what poor really means.

Purposeful regulation and strangling
of energy (for the good of the planet) will cause people to not be able to
afford gas and electric, let alone fuel for transportation. When you have no electric, you have no
electric stuff, including things that need to be charged. Making electricity unaffordable, or shutting
down the grid, would be the surest way of killing the internet.

I’m sure you agree that
civil war seems unthinkable. However, I
am at the point where I cannot see any decent way out of this mess. If you do, then speak up about it.

What’s the answer? I haven’t got one. Previously, I thought the answer was for Tea
Partiers and strict Constitutionalists to take charge of the Republican Party,
once we took the Senate and the Presidency.
But we didn’t take the Senate, or the Presidency, and we didn’t gain
anything in the House. And now the
establishment Republicans seem stronger than ever. Can we do a repeat of 2010 in the 2014 mid
terms, if America
lasts that long? If we can’t take
control of the Republican Party, then all may be lost. Starting a whole new Party with all that
entails is no short term project.

We may wind up voting on
ballots with lists of stand-alone, unaligned individual candidates. If we do, it is almost certain that the most
organized Party – the Democrats – will win big.
Again.

I still think our best hope
is to take over the Republican Party and throw the leadership and the
establishment types out. We are not ever
going to get back to Constitutional America with them running the show.

Do nations have souls?

When you go into the
confessional, and the priest slides open the little sound-proof barrier, you
make the sign of the cross and say “Bless me Father, for I have sinned; it has
been umpty-ump days since my last confession.”
And you begin. It is a regular
experience of humility, contrition, confession, repentance and absolution. It is both humbling and cleansing; the ending
Act of Contrition presents a new
determined pledge to sin no more, and to avoid the near occasion of sin. The reward is spiritual renewal; a regular
outpouring of Grace.

How does a nation do that?

[29] If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it
away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body
be thrown into hell.
[30] And if your right hand
causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away; it is better that you lose one
of your members than that your whole body go into hell.
- Matt. 5:29-30.

The whole teaching involves,
after confession and absolution, doing whatever it takes to avoid returning to
sin. I submit that a good beginning
point for the American nation might be to remove and expunge “leaders” like
John Boehner and John McCain from office and from the political Party that is
supposed to represent the best interests of our Constitutional Republic. They have shown no interest in protecting us
from our own government. They cooperate
in increasing government control of us.
They cover this treacherous cooperation in the lie that says “we know
how to get things done and make things work in Washington.”

They are either enemies of
the Constitution in disguise, or they are incredibly stupid, easily manipulated
political hacks with neither the intent or the ability to stand against
evil. They may not even recognize
evil. That kind of “leadership” is
taking us to hell.

It all began with the first
lie. It then progressed to the point
where someone who recognized the lie as a lie would not clearly identify it as
a lie, for purely political reasons. And
then we began to be ruled by “politics” rather than truth.

And then the lie metastasized
and spread throughout the culture.

===

Pray for America; hope
for the best; prepare for the worst.

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click a footnote link to see the gory details.)

Comments

This is just so wrong on so
many points it’s hard to know where to begin.
The biggest thing that stands out is opposition to any social safety net
for the unfortunates. How can you call yourself
Catholic if you walk past the person in need and just ignore the plight of the
needy?

How does your American nationalism
square with Jesus’ instruction to the rich young man to sell all he had and
give it all to the poor? How do you
argue around Acts where the disciples sold all their possessions and together
held all things in common?

Date: Sat Dec
08 08:09:09 2012 From: Vic Biorseth Comment:

Arlene:

Re yours of Fri Dec 07 11:28:19 2012:

The American Constitution is
not a Catholic document; it is a legal document, fixing the supreme civil law, not ecclesial law, of the
land, at the federal level. Charity is
not the proper business of the federal government. If anyone wanted to make it the business of
the federal government, the process of Constitutional Amendment is present and available
for that purpose.

Charity is your job, and
mine; not the government’s. The natural safety net rests with the
citizenry, and so long as the citizenry is, as Tocqueville once described us, a
good people, there will be no lack of
Good Samaritans in the population.

The natural and normal and,
once upon a time, automatic safety net
was a multi-tiered support system consisting of family, friends, neighbors,
church congregation, charitable organizations, and ending with township or
county work houses and poor houses. Most
of those are no more. The Democrat Party
has destroyed them all, or is working to destroy whatever remains of them. The current federal government even works to
eliminate lower government support systems, because they compete with citizen
dependency on the federal government alone.

Some of this has been
orchestrated from the bottom up, through mal-education. Here is the nucleus of the Revolutionary Man formal education has
been developing to oppose the invented horrible straw villain Authoritarian Man:

"The revolutionary is the man who has emancipated himself from ties of
blood and soil, from his mother and his father, from special loyalties
to state, class, race, party, or religion." --Eric Fromm & Abraham Maslow

This mal-educated person
will refuse help from the normal
social network, because he has been educationally alienated from it and he
hates it. He will, instead, demand help from the government, which
means, from you and me – the tax payers.
And he won’t necessarily be in real need when the demands begin.

The Prodigal Son demanded
his inheritance early, was granted it by his father, and left the family
support system. He squandered it and
began the process of slow starvation. (Was
this somehow not natural?) He repented
and returned to the family fold in humility, and was accepted back home. (Was this somehow not natural?)

If we are to enjoy true
liberty, we must recognize that true liberty includes the liberty to make bad
decisions and suffer the consequences.
See the Rule of Subsidiarity page.

Re yours of Sat Dec 08 00:12:43 2012:

The Rich Young Man had his
answer before he pressed the issue: keep
the Commandments. That was all he
had to do. But he felt called to do
more, and he asked what more he should do.
He was unusual, among his peers.
This was the call to the priesthood, or to complete religious life. The close disciples you refer to in Acts
formed the first primitive religious order.
They – not the general population, and not all the followers of the Lord
– voluntarily and willingly gave up all, and lived only for the Lord. Selling all they had and sharing in the
proceeds was, of course, a one time shot.
After that, they had to live off of the tithes and charity of others,
who had not given up all.

The Rich Young Man, and Acts
of the Apostles do not describe any governmental or non-governmental organization
for all people. It was how the Apostles
and the closest disciples lived in close communion with the Lord and with each
other.

When our Lord became
incarnate to live, suffer and die as man, he “emptied Himself of Godliness” to
become fully man, to show us the Way, and to show us our ultimate destination.

When the members of any
vowed religious order took the final vows of chastity, poverty and obedience,
they “emptied themselves of worldliness” to become totally divorced from the
world and live in close communion with the Lord and with each other.

That’s how I square it. Our Constitution is not for any religious
order, but for a civil government.

Regards,

Vic

Date: Sun Dec 09 23:21:42
2012 From: BennyEmail:Location:Comment:

You said all the best republican men running are women. Does that mean you still prefer Sarah Palin?

Date: Mon Dec 10 05:51:36
2012 From: Vic Biorseth Comment:

Benny:

It does.

Regards,

Vic

Date: Mon Dec 10 12:00:14
2012 From: AhmetEmail:Location:Comment:

Would not bailout of citizens fix everything. Take bailout
of bank and company and give to everyone. When everyone have bailout they spend
and economy go better.

Date: Mon Dec 10 20:13:33
2012 From: Vic Biorseth Comment:

Ahmet:

I’m sorry, but it just doesn’t work that way. The money that you use to bail anything out
has to come from somewhere. The government
can only get money from the citizens in the first place, unless they print it
or borrow it. If you take money out of the
private sector – which means from the citizenry – and then you give it to the
citizenry, it’s a wash. What you pay the
citizens equals what you took from the citizens, and the net result is
zero.

FDR began the lie that you could put the population back to
work with the population’s money with his big make-work projects during the
Great Depression. He pretended that the
new government workers on large government projects paid taxes to increase
revenue. What he neglected to say was
that all the government pay these workers made (and paid taxes on) came out of
the private sector in the form of taxes in the first place. Government workers are thus a net loss to government revenue, because they
never pay enough taxes to equal the original tax dollars taken out of the
system to pay them with.

Nancy Pelosi continues in that old traditional Democrat lie
by telling the mal-educated and heavily indoctrinated Democrat voters that things
like unemployment checks boost the economy.
Obviously, if that were true, everyone should go on unemployment so that
we would experience a great economic boom.
Obviously, it is false.

Beneath it all is a basic error, which Democrats and other
Marxists feed. This lie says that if you
put money (disregard the source of the money for the moment) into the hands of
the citizenry, they will spend it and cause expanding ripples of economic
activity that will boost the economy. But
what the citizenry will do with windfall money is not quite that
predictable. Some will save it; some in
banks, some may bury it in the back yard.
Some will squander it. Some will
party with it. Some will gamble with
it. Some will be charitable with
it. Some will pay debts with it. At any rate, it will soon be gone.

The approach is the opposite of Reagan’s so-called supply side economics, which doesn’t
seek to falsely or temporarily create a demand
for goods or services. Demcrats believe –
or would induce others believe – that “free” money in the hands of citizens is
what drives the economy. But all “free”
money drives is irresponsibility, laziness and dependency. Each time it is tried, it is a very temporary
fix, and it is an addicting fix. It does not fix the economy; all it fixes, in an ever increasingly temporary way, is the citizen's feeling of well being, until the money runs out again.

Regards,

Vic

Date: Sun Aug 31 2014From: Vic BiorsethComment:

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic
Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option
June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .

Regards,

Vic

Language and Tone Statement

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to just stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our high Roman Catholic and Constitutional American standards of Truth, logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, obscene, blindly & doggedly anti-Catholic, anti-American, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, be prepared to back it up, keep it clean, keep it civil, and it will be published. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the Hard Left is what it always was, the New Leftist Liberals are what they are, and the Internet is what it is.

"Clickbait" advertising links are not acceptable for posting here.

If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elitist Culturally Marxist Pure Authoritarians cannot and will not tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their rigid authoritarian, anti-equality, anti-life, anti-liberty, anti-property, hedonistic, anti-Constitution, pro-Marxist, pro-Islam, anti-Catholic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-male, sexist, pro-homosexual, anti-heterosexual, anti-white, racist, anti-Western, anti-American, Globalist, anti-Nation, blatantly immoral, totally intolerant and bigoted point of view.

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Silence in the face of evil is speaking. "We've had enough of exhortations to be silent!
Cry out with a hundred thousand tongues. I see that the world is rotten
because of silence." Saint Catherine of Siena

“An
error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is
suppressed…. He who does not oppose an evident crime is open to the suspicion of
secret complicity.” – Pope Felix III

“Do not forget your purpose and destiny as God's creatures.
What you are in God's sight is what you are and nothing more”—Justice Clarence Thomas

"Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, then, is the sin committed by the person who claims to have a 'right' to persist in evil-in any sin at all-and who thus rejects redemption." Pope Saint John Paul the GreatDOMINUM ET VIVIFICANTEM

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it, and, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men-when we can do it-is no less a sin than to encourage them." Pope St. Felix III

If a purposeful violator of the Constitution who is a sworn officer of the governemt is not a domestic enemy of America and a traitor, then
there is no such thing, and the Constitution itself is without meaning,
and America has lost its grounding and its very purpose for being. Anti-American-Court

Live Interviews

"All the evils of the world are due to lukewarm Catholics." Pope Pius V

"All the strength of Satan's reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics." Pope St. Pius X

Click the image above topublish your essay or article here,to be included among those below.

Submitted Articles andReprinted Articles

(Note: copyrights on these articles wherever present will supersede the WebSite copyright at the bottom footer of every WebPage)

Still Time To Get It Right. “Once you understand the role of energy in everything, you can begin to appreciate why there's simply nothing more important to get right. Energy is at the root of everything. If you have sufficient energy, anything is possible. But without it, everything grinds to a halt.” Chris Martenson

The Heresy of Chrislam. Those claiming that the “Allah” of Islam’s Qu’ran and Yahweh or God of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are one and the same are missing one glaring point: GOD NEVER CONTRADICTS HIMSELF.

Never be lukewarm.Life itself demands passion.He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input. Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.

NewsletterCatholic American ThinkerFree E-zine Subscription

Email

You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you theCatholic American ThinkerNewsletterand absolutely nothing else.

Treachery and Treason PagesAll the sneaky, underhanded ways that Evil undoes natural goodness, by convincing good men, first that nothing is black and white; second, that there are many, many shades of gray; and third and finally, that bad is good, and good is bad.

"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII

"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi

Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance
may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston
Churchill

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who
deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

“ … for I have sworn upon
the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind
of man.” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush in
the year of our Lord 1800. The context
involved resistance to any form of Christianity or Deism legally imposing
itself throughout the USA. We must wonder what he might say
about our current government's forced imposition of strict secularism – i.e.,
anti-theism – throughout the USA. I submit that legally enforced secularism of society, like theocracy, like Marxism,
and like Islam, is, precisely, a form of tyranny over the mind of man.Nothing good can come from the religious cleansing of Judaeo-Christian society. Government imposed secularism is just another form of theocracy.