In five separate matters, Respondent was found to have engaged in a pattern of failing to diligently represent his clients, failing to properly communicate with them, and failing to properly provide fee agreements. In one instance, he charged a contingent fee in a criminal case, which is prohibited. In two others, he failed to return unearned fees. Respondent has a history of two informal admonitions and a private reprimand for similar misconduct.

Rule Violation(s)

1.3, 1.4(a)(2), 1.4(a)(3), 1.4(a)(4), 1.5(b), 1.5(d)(2), and 1.16(d)

Discipline Imposed

Suspension for 3 months, stayed with 1 year probation

Points of Law

Remorse and understanding of problems in practice justifies a stayed, rather than an actual, suspension, even in light of a pattern of misconduct.