Change Details

Right now filters are executed in ascending order, using their ID. At the moment this doesn't really cause much problems, apart from the ones exposed in T132846 and other minor stuff. However, we'd better be able to manage execution order so that we can start working on bugs like T120740 and T186960. I'll try to work on this, but I think the real problem is to find a nice interface to show, while coding it shouldn't be too hard (although it'll require a new DB column).

Right now filters are executed in ascending order, using their ID. At the moment this doesn't really cause much problems, apart from the ones exposed in T132846 and other minor stuff. However, we'd better be able to manage execution order so that we can start working on bugs like T120740 and T186960. I'll try to work on this, but I think the real problem is to find a nice interface to show, while coding it shouldn't be too hard (although it'll require a new DB column).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