The Liberal Lies Undermining America

In Order To Stop The Liberal-Engineered National Stagnation And Decline, Americans Desperately Need To Recognize Basic, Undeniable Truths And Return To Honest National Discourse
By Col. Tom Snodgrass (Ret.), Right Side News

The Liberal Lies

‘Wealth Transfer’ is justified and productive, i.e., ‘From Each According to Ability to Each According to Need’

‘Multiculturalism’ strengthens America because all cultures are equal and ‘Diversity’ is necessary for ‘Social Fairness’

‘Institutional Racism’ is rampant in America based on ‘White Privilege’

‘Political Correctness’ is necessary to ensure ‘Civil Discourse’ that doesn’t marginalize the disadvantaged

Wealth Transfer

‘Wealth Transfer’ schemes, which have failed spectacularly from the Plymouth Colony near-starvation to the downfall of Soviet Union, have been erroneously validated and defended by the economically ignorant utopians based on ‘social justice’ and ‘economic development.’ The false premises underlying this deleterious, self-defeating economic proposition are ‘fairness’ and the baseless belief that providing economic security will ‘change human nature’ and inspire commitment to work for the common good of the community instead of personal gain. That neither of one of these premises has proved true has foreordained assured systemic collapses wherever ‘wealth transfer’ has been tried since Karl Marx codified ‘wealth transfer’ in the British Library based purely on theory, not empirical historical evidence.
The American people must wake-up soon and understand that the ever-increasing ‘wealth transfers’ into social welfare programs come at the critical costs of depriving the economy of growth capital and national security of necessary funding. This wake-up call should come without difficulty because it should be common sense, but instead ‘wealth transfer’ has had a narcotic-coma effect on the American body politic.

Climate Change/Global Warming

The climate has been changing constantly and drastically, warming and cooling, for the entire 4.5 billion years of earth’s geologic history, while the earliest evidence of human life on earth goes back just 1.8 million years. Therefore, since man has only been present for just the most miniscule portion of earth’s existence, liberals fail to account for the causes of the constant ‘climate change/global warming’ during more than 99% of earth’s being. This deliberate exclusion of the 4.5 billion years of documented ‘climate change/global warming’ from examination or explanation is justified by liberals because anthropogenic ‘climate change/global warming’ is ‘settled science.’ So, the obvious question that the true believing climate changers/global warmists evade answering like the plague is: Since there was radical climate change and global warming/cooling for 99% of the world’s geologic history before man even set foot on the planet, how do liberals scientifically examine and prove that any change of the climate is just not a continuation of the the climatic forces that have always occasioned change? In other words, what is the proof that man has suddenly become more powerful than the forces of the universe and preempted them? Since ‘Greenland’ was obviously originally named ‘Greenland’ because it was verdant landscape, what caused the tremendous climatic change at that north latitude because the change from temperate to arctic long predated mankind’s introduction of industrial quantities of carbon into the atmosphere?
Unfortunately, instead of the sciences of historical geology and climatology that contradict their unproven and unprovable climate beliefs, liberals accept as gospel the ‘settled science’ pronounced by the ‘world renown climatologists’ Barack Hussein Obama, Albert Arnold Gore, Jr., and John Forbes Kerry. The liberal inexplicable, unquestioning acceptance of man-caused ‘climate change/global warming’ should not even be tolerated in a 7th grade science class, but nevertheless allegedly educated liberal people are ‘true climate change/global warming believers’! A large segment of the liberal American people has apparently lost the ability to reason logically. Again, a wake-up call is desperately needed.

The Abrahamic Muslim Religion of Peace

It is Islamic dogma that Islam is a ‘religion’ that traces its roots to the Jewish and Christian patriarch Abraham through Abraham’s son Ishmael, who was born of Abraham’s Egyptian slave concubine Hagar. Ishmael’s birth would have occurred circa 2000 B.C. Then in 610 A.D. Mohammad began to concoct the dogma with which he crafted a ‘religion’ that he used to attract, reward, and disciple a mafia-like tribe of cut-throat, desert brigands. So after more than 2,600 years, and with no tangible evidence or even verbal tradition, Mohammad alone in a cave conceived the linkage of Islam’s religious lineage to Abraham in order to tie Islam to the already well-established and respected religions of the Middle East, Judaism and Christianity, for credibility. Mohammad used that credibility to inspire his gang of marauders, which employed pillage, rape, and murder to sustain their ‘religion’ and to recruit more and more new followers to the plunder gained from their caravan raiding banditry.
The entire theology of Islam was purportedly imparted periodically (as Mohammad needed) from Allah to Mohammad through the Angel Gabriel when Mohammad was alone in a cave or alone in other solitary settings. These ‘Allah-dictated revelations’ were supposedly committed to memory by Mohammad and later spewed out to his followers in order to give divine authority to Mohammad’s decisions. Since the ‘Allah-dictated revelations’ were situational and made on-the-fly, there were frequent contradictions from situation to situation. When Mohammad was confronted with these contradictions, he went into solitude, allegedly consulted with Allah and Gabriel, and returned with dictums from Allah to pacify the followers and to explain why the Allah ‘god’ changes his mind.

Quran 2:106 – “We [Allah] do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?”
Quran 13:39: “Allah eliminates what He wills or confirms, and with Him is the Mother of the Book.”
Quran16:101: “And when We substitute a verse in place of a verse – and Allah is most knowing of what He sends down – they say, “You, [O Muhammad], are but an inventor [of lies].” But most of them do not know.”

These three Quranic verses (suras) explain the ‘Law of Abrogation’ that became necessary when the followers of Muhammad realized that Allah’s instructions were conflicting or inconsistent, so purportedly Allah told Muhammad to tell the Muslims that Allah had changed his mind and was just giving the followers better instructions that replaced earlier instructions or suras.
While the theology of Judaism and Christianity evolved from Moses, a long line of prophets, Jesus, and the apostles, the theology of Islam rests solely on the word of Mohammad, Allah’s one and exclusive prophet. Rather than divine inspiration as the basis of Islamic theology, Islam is decidedly anthropogenic in origin. The difference is apparent time and again, for instance, when the Christian Bible’s instructions to Christians are compared and contrasted with the Islamic Quran’s instructions to Muslims. Perhaps no example of the difference of the divine versus the human is clearer than treatment of one’s enemies. Jesus counselled his followers:
Matthew 5:43-45: 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
While according to Mohammad, Allah counselled his followers:

Quran 8:12 [Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, “I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.”

It is at this point that the Islamic dogma proclaiming Abrahamic roots of Islam completely falls apart. One needn’t be a religious theologian or a member of Mensa to comprehend that ‘a god’ cannot be the same ‘deity’ when that ‘divine source’ issues completely contradictory instructions to followers on how to behave regarding one’s enemies in exactly the same circumstances. In order to deter non-Muslims in the U.S. and Europe from discovering and discussing that Islam is an anthropocentrically conceived religious cult rather than the claimed Abrahamic religion, the concept of ‘Islamophobia’ was invented to prevent examination of tell-tail evidence like the ‘Law of Abrogation’ and the obvious disparities between the theology of the God of Abraham and the theology of the god of Mohammad. For instance, to even quote verbatim from the Quran in order to illustrate the contradictions of Islam is immediately decried as ‘Islamophobic’ by Muslims and the liberal defenders of Islam!
The reason why it is imperative to discredit ‘Islamophobia” and rip off the Abrahamic mask from Islam is because the alleged common origin of the religions has provided Muslims with entrée into Western Civilization to conduct stealth jihad undermining Western societies from within. Americans must demand that political, religious, and social leaders educate themselves about the Islamic enemy and begin to formulate national security, religious, and social policies that realistically deal with the existential threat of Islam.

Multiculturalism/Diversity’s Debilitating Effects On America

‘Multiculturalism’ is a social weapon conceived by the Cultural Marxist ‘Frankfurt School’ to undermine and destroy Western societies because, in order for a new Marxist culture to take root (see ‘wealth transfer’ above), the existing Western cultural must be destroyed. Under the multicultural rubric that all cultures are equal, Cultural Marxism is attacking:

Liberal Democrats have used ‘multiculturalism’ to defend their ‘open border/ illegal alien amnesty’ policies by accusing their rational opponents of ‘bigoted, hateful racism’ for disagreeing with the Democrat stratagem to import a large, low-information, low-skilled population that will become a permanent, welfare-dependent Democrat Party voting constituency. For liberals, ‘multiculturalism’ is all about changing U.S. voting demographics in their favor. The Democrat Party needs a permanent underclass to support its big government welfare.
An equally deleterious conceptual social weapon for undermining Western societies along with ‘multiculturalism’ is ‘diversity.’ The alleged purpose of mandating ‘diversity’ throughout the U.S. and the wider Western world is ‘social fairness’ to give all people equal access to the public arena. However, ‘diversity’ of skin color and/or gender is essentially used as a diversion to preclude ‘diversity’ of opinions, specifically conservative opinion is excluded from idea forums by the liberal forces of so-called ‘diversity.’
The pretenses of ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘diversity’ must be challenged and exposed as false each time they are employed to undermine Western culture and exclude conservative ideas from the public forum.

‘Institutional Racism’ born of ‘White Privilege’

‘Institutional racism’ and ‘white privilege’ are two more deleterious conceptual social weapons that have no basis in fact, but they are constantly given lip-service by the forces of liberalism working against traditional America. Barack Obama as president, along with Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch as attorneys general, whose positions at the top of the U.S. Government should make those charges preposterous, but instead these three individuals fed the ‘institutional racism’ and ‘white privilege’ narratives during the ‘Skip Gates’/ ‘Trevon Martin’/ ‘Ferguson’/ ‘Baltimore’ fiascos. Growing from those fiascos the baseless ‘hands up-don’t shoot’ and ‘black lives matter’ memes perpetuate the groundless ‘institutional racism’ and ‘white privilege’ charges.
When three blacks have held the two most important U.S. law enforcement positions for six plus years, one would think that common sense would smash the ‘institutional racism’ and ‘white privilege’ slander, but liberals repudiate common sense whenever common sense invalidates their unsubstantiated, venomous agitprop. Since liberals are obviously immune to common sense, discrediting the ‘institutional racism’ and ‘white privilege’ calumnies will be difficult, so all the practical forces of traditional America can do is to continually proclaim the truth and do the right thing, while directing their common sense message to those Americans that are not low-information, knee-jerk liberals.

‘Political Correctness’ is necessary to ensure ‘Civil Discourse’ that doesn’t marginalize the disadvantaged

‘Political correctness’ is the Cultural Marxist social weapon that makes possible the widespread, unquestioning acceptance of ‘wealth transfer,’ ‘climate change/global warming,’ ‘Abrahamic Muslim religion of peace,’ ‘multiculturalism/diversity,’ and ‘Institutional racism/white privilege.’ ‘Political correctness’ in the U.S. today is self-censorship that is eerily reminiscent of the politically-sterilized life described in George Orwell’s ‘1984.’ The effect of ‘political correctness’ is that:

genuine moral discourse on difficult social issues can become impossible when the risks of upsetting some portion of one’s audience are too great. Reliance on euphemism and platitude should be expected in this strategic climate.

When a problem cannot be honestly and correctly identified, resolution of the problem is impossible.

Conclusion

Since ‘political correctness’ self-censorship is the fundamental reason why all of the liberal lies are succeeding in undermining America, it is the first obstacle that must be removed. Not until honest discourse is returned to the American political, intellectual, religious, and social idea-marketplaces can Americans break the liberal death-grips of ‘wealth transfer,’ ‘climate change/global warming,’ ‘Abrahamic Muslim religion of peace,’ ‘multiculturalism/diversity,’ ‘Institutional racism/white privilege’ and ‘political correctness’ that are inhibiting America’s progress by stifling or misdirecting national efforts.]]>