Secession of at least some states, would immediately put the federal government in its right place, and permit the People of the several states to regain their sovereignty.

Gary, what you write I have no problem with - we are on the same page - it is widespread public corruption.

But the piece below, again gets into "Activist", "socialist", etc, etc, as if corruption has an ideological bent. It also defeats your purpose to attribute the corruption to particular segment of the judiciary, or government in general, when the corruption is widespread and systemic.

I do not believe that there is any workable solution for the corruption of the US government, absent secession of at least some states, which would immediately put the federal government in its right place, and permit the People of the several states to regain their sovereignty.

Unfortunately, I do not believe that California is likely to be a leader in such initiative. Montana, Vermont, New Hampshire, or Texas are likely to lead the way.

The above statements are not only true, but they are self evident. Although the judiciary is only one of the 3 independent co-equal branches of government - each branch has its own province and particular task - separation of powers, the so-called checks & balances. The judiciary's particular task is to act as the gatekeeper, the final backstop; to properly and honestly interpret the law and uphold the Rule of Law and our Constitution, so that our government actually has integrity and actually represents and serves the People.

Unfortunately, the judiciary, like the other 2 branches has fallen down on the job, and has come to serve someone, somethings, other than the People and has made a mess of things. Here is an old Latin quote that sums up much of what has gone wrong:

Corruptisia republica plurimae leges - The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. Cornelius Tacitus [55 -117 A.D.].

Below is a 12/29/11 wnd.com - World Net Daily article, showing in greater detail how things have gone wrong and
how - JUDGES HAVE GONE WILD!GLZ.
____________________________________________ WHISTLEBLOWER MAGAZINE

JUDGES GONE WILD!

How to stop activist courts from destroying America

Still reeling from the Obama administration's ongoing socialist makeover of their country, most Americans have understandably focused their outrage on the executive and legislative branches of government, watching a rogue president and radicalized Congress wreak havoc on the freest, most prosperous nation on earth.

Yet, the branch of government arguably most responsible for the "fundamental transformation of America" is neither the executive nor legislative. As the Januaryissue of WND's monthly Whistleblower magazinedramatically shows, the most arrogant, unaccountable andtransformationalbranch of government today is the judiciary, which, virtually unshackled from the Constitution, has declared itself the supreme branch of government.

Unquestionably, the most consequential downward changes America has suffered in recent decades – corruptions of law, foundational values and core institutions so radical that no president, no Congress, no governor or state legislature, could conceivably implement them – have been forced on Americans by a rogue judiciary.

Wantonly irrational and unconstitutional judicial decisions are now the norm – from the California judge who overruled the will of millions of voters and single-handedly legalized same-sex marriage in that state (only to later reveal he himself is a homosexual in a long-term relationship with another man – a gross conflict of interest); to the Ninth Circuit ruling that schoolchildren can't say "under God" when reciting the Pledge of Allegiance; to the Texas judge who threatened to throw students in jail for praying or even uttering words like "prayer" or "amen" at a graduation ceremony; to the Supreme Court's notorious 2005Kelodecision allowing local governments literally to confiscate a citizen's property and award it to another party if that "taking" increased their tax revenues; to the 1973Roe v. Wadedecision that invented the "constitutional right" to kill preborn children – 50 million and counting.

And for every high-profile case like these, there are a multitude of others – like that of the Vermont judge who took a little girl away from her loving, Christian, biological mother and awarded full custody instead to the mother's one-time lesbian partner who reportedly gives the child nightmares – decisions that, over time, have degraded Americans' basic freedoms, faith, institutions and values.

Worse, Americans have long been deceived into believing there's nothing they can do – that once a judge rules, it's "game over," especially when the Supreme Court decides a case. Only a constitutional amendment can trump a Supreme Court decision, we've been taught.

Wrong.

As "JUDGES GONE WILD"reveals, though America's judiciary has usurped power it does not constitutionally possess, it is only the cowardice and complicity of the other two branches of government – executive and legislative – and the ignorance of state governments and the general public that keep the modern myth of "judicial supremacy" alive.

In reality, as Whistleblowercomprehensively demonstrates, there are a host of powerful, constitutionally prescribed remedies a right-thinking Congress and president can readily employ to stop an out-of-control judiciary in its tracks. Whistleblower even shows how some of America's most popular presidents, from Jefferson to Jackson to Lincoln, have used these very tools to neutralize judicial tyranny and re-establish the balance of power the founding fathers ordained.

"Jefferson's urgent warning" by David Kupelian, who shows just how prescient the third president was in warning future generations to prevent judicial tyranny

"Too many unlawful 'laws'" by Joseph Farah, who notes that while Americans represent only 5 percent of the world's population, they boast 70 percent of the world's attorneys

"Anatomy of an extremist on the high court" by Aaron Klein, who documents how Justice Elena Kagan's record of radical activism severely threatens an impartial review of Obamacare

"'Gay' Prop 8 judge 'direct beneficiary' of ruling" by Bob Unruh, exposing the ultimate conflict-of-interest case of the homosexual judge in a long-term same-sex relationship overruling 7 million California voters to legalize gay marriage in that state

"Not judicial activism – judicialtyranny" by Patrick Buchanan, who shows how rogue judges are succeeding in imposing "a social and moral revolution on America"

"How Mitt Romney enabled 'gay marriage'" by Amy L. Contrada, who asks: When pulled in two opposite directions, should governors – and presidents – follow the court or follow the Constitution?

"Bringing the courts back under the Constitution" by Newt Gingrich, on exactly how the next president and Congress must reign in America's out-of-control judiciary

"Ron Paul's 'We the People' Act would limit federal courts" by Art Moore, who points out that Congress already has the power to stop judicial activism in its tracks

"Don't trust Supremes with Obamacare" by Bob Unruh, explaining how the 10th Amendment permits states to reject the administration's healthcare takeover, regardless of what the Supreme Court rules

"Voters oust justices who established same-sex marriage" by Art Moore, on how Iowans sent an "overwhelming message to the rest of the nation that judges can be held accountable"

"Yes, the feds have created a tyrannical prosecutorial state" by William L. Anderson, who notes that judges and prosecutors don't want citizens to know about their power to nullify unjust laws

"The rights of juries to judge the justice of the laws" by Lysander Spooner

"Three cheers for jury nullification" by Vox Day, who says that since the Magna Carta, there's been one easy way to stop judicial tyranny

"Term-limit justices, let Congress veto court rulings" by Mark R. Levin, on why the Supreme Court is just too broken to be fixed solely by "naming seemingly good candidates"

"Reagan upheld the rule of law" by Edwin Meese III, in which the Reagan attorney general says the 40th president held that "originalism" was the only proper philosophy for a judge

"In 1820," WND Managing Editor David Kupelian notes, "Thomas Jefferson issued a dire warning to future generations of Americans. He said, 'To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.'

"This issue of Whistleblowerexposes this 'dangerous doctrine' as the naked power grab it is," says Kupelian. "And it reveals how America can – indeedmust– reestablish the constitutional balance of powers and end the tyranny of the judiciary, which too long has served as the cutting edge in remolding America into the image of the political and moral left."

Adds WND founder and Editor Joseph Farah, "If readers truly want to find out how to stop an out-of-control judiciary that is operating way outside the bounds of the Constitution, they really need to read this particular issue of Whistleblower."

As a first step: I adopted the habit of adding at the end of any Request, Motion, etc, a standard statement, along the following lines:

Request for Access to the US Courts and safeguard of Federal Due Process rights

The undersigned asks that instant Request/Motion, duly filed, be duly entered, and duly adjudicated by a US Judge(s), holding all required credentials, and that a decision on instant Request/Motion, signed by such Judge(s), be duly served and noticed and authenticated by a Clerk/Deputy Clerk holding all required credentials.

If I receive an unsigned / unauthenticated judicial record on my first paper, there simply is no sense in going on, and I just walk away from the charade.

As a second step: I ask for a certified copy of any decision, order, judgment. If the clerk of the court refuses to provide such certified judicial records, the court is certified corrupt.

I find no sense in subjecting myself to the abuse by any court of my own free will.

Additional steps: Boycott the Vote, Secede!Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
________
P.S.
1. As demonstrated by Judge Virginia Phillips, walking away from a case and failing to oppose a Motion to Dismiss is no guarantee that the case would be dismissed either. Corrupt judges like to prolong the abuse of the People for as long as possible and maximize the income of corrupt attorneys.
2. Media, who honestly perform their duties, should not report on any decision, judgment, decree of any US court, unless they are provided with a certified copy of the judicial record.

Boycott the vote! It only legitimizes the illegitimate... 11-12-10 Where Should #Occupy Go Next? Civil Disobedience in the Footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http://www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/Secede!____Human Rights Alert (NGO)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______ Flag Counter:128http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/Total Reads: 686,060Followers: 1,239http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://twitter.com/inproperinlahttp://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345Total Item Views:585,338http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/____________________________As part of efforts for the preservation of our civilization for future generations:

Ron;
What can we all do to help?
This must be stopped.
The federal courts around the country are dishonest and way out of control.

Cordially,

JG ___________

On My Way To Get Justice, I Just Got Mugged!

By Ron BransonNational J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief

REQUEST FOR EN BANC DETERMINATION
Docket Number 11-56857
D.C. No.: 2:11-cv-00565-ODW-JEMQuestion Presented To The Ninth Circuit For Determination En Banc:Is Appellant Required to Present His Questions on Appeal
at the Time of Filing His Notice of Appeal?

INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises out of a federal suit involving fraud engaged in by the underlying state court, County of Los Angeles, wherein a 11/24/2009 Minute Order was fraudulently created alleging Plaintiff was present and arraigned on criminal charges, a fact contradicted by declaration of the very court reporter noted within the 11/24/2009 Minute Order, which declaration is entered into evidence in this federal action, and unopposed by all Defendants within this case!
This fraud question passed through the hands of four federal judges who recused themselves from the case, and was passed on to a fifth federal judge who dismissed the case 10/17/2011 without dealing with the issue of fraud within the complaint or fraud within the state court system, County of Los Angeles.
Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal, and paid the $455 fee three days later on 10/20/2011, EXHIBIT A. On 10/25/2011, five days later, Appellant was sent a notice of intent to dismiss the appeal, stating â€œA review of the record demonstrates that this appeal may be appropriate for summary disposition because the questions on which the decision in the appeal depends may be so insubstantial as not to justify further proceedings,â€ EXHIBIT B. This was followed up by a second notice informing Appellate that the appeal was dismissed dated 12/8/2011, EXHIBIT C.

ARGUMENT RE QUESTION:Is Appellant Required to Present His Questions on Appeal
at the Time of Filing His Notice of Appeal?

All that had been filed in the appeal was a Notice of Appeal. Immediately thereafter, Appellant received an Order of intent to dismiss the appeal due to â€œinsubstantialâ€ questions presented in the appeal. The Order cites 9th Cir. Rule 3-6, but such rule cannot apply by virtue of its own wording, as the only time it can only apply, if applicable at all, is prior to the conclusion of a briefing, not before briefing begins. It is impossible to conclude what has not started. In fulfillment of the Order stating intent to dismiss, Appellant received an Order of Dismissal dated 12/8/2011 citing United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (1982), which is inapropos. The Hooton case states, â€œAlthough it is difficult to formulate a precise standard, not every case in which appellant files an unimpressive opening brief is appropriate for summary affirmance. Motions to affirm should be confined to appeals obviously controlled by precedent and cases in which insubstantiality is manifest from the face of appellantâ€™s brief.â€ Twice the Hooton case states to its determination as based upon the questions presented in an opening brief. But here there is no â€œopening brief,â€ only the filing of a Notice of Appeal.
It is manifest that the intent is to dismiss this appeal at the Notice stage before the appeal started. Since the standard set forth in the Order is case precedent, the question is whether there exists case precedent within the Ninth Circuit, or any of the U.S. Circuit, to dismiss an appeal upon the filing of a Notice.
The appropriate standard to be applied here is Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 3(c)(4), to wit, â€œAn appeal must not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, or for failure to name a party whose intent to appeal is otherwise clear from the notice.â€ The filing of a Notice of Appeal is jurisdictional, and Rule 3(c)(1) states the minimum required. â€œThe notice of appeal must: (A) specify the party or parties taking the appeal by naming each one in the caption or body of the notice… (B) designate the judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed; and (C) name the court to which the appeal is taken.â€ Appellant followed the prescribed form articulately as provided within the Rules. Having so provided all the necessary information in the Notice of Appeal, â€œAn appeal must not be dismissedâ€ based upon reaching inadequacy. The Order of 12/8/2011 finds the â€œquestions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district courtâ€™s order of dismissal. AFFIRMED.â€ The logical question is, what questions are we talking about? There are no questions presented in this appeal, either insubstantial, or otherwise, only a Notice of Appeal!

CONCLUSION

1.) The Order of Dismissal dated 12/8/2011, EXHIBIT C, runs contrary to opinion of United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982).
2.) The Order of 12/8/2011 runs afoul of the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3 governing appeals as a matter of Right, and treats this appeal as permissive under Title 28 U.S.C., Sec. 1292(b), which statute is limited only to bankruptcy and interlocutory appeals.
3.) The Order of 12/8/2011 is in conflict with Title 28 U.S.C., Sec 1291, which statute, passed by Congress, governs the right of appeal, and the jurisdiction of this Ninth Circuit.
4.) This Order of 12/8/2011, being in violation of the Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedures, is in conflict with every other Circuit within this nation subject to Rule 3 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
5.) Lastly, the Order of 12/8/2011, EXHIBIT C, presents a major shift from basic due process of the First Amendment right â€œto petition government for a redress of grievances,â€ and requires a faithful en banc determination by this Circuit as to whether substantial appellate questions must attend with, or immediately thereafter, the filing of all Notices of Appeal, and failure to do so shall constitute â€œautomatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute,â€ Order of 10/25/2011, EXHIBIT B.

Bet Tzedek's President, Sandor Samuels - former Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide, and former Associate Counsel of Bank of America - a person who was central to one of the largest frauds in the history of mankind, against homeowners, shareholders, and taxpayers, is now being koshered as Mr Jewish Justice...Los Angeles, December 31 - "Sandor Samuels, President of Bet Tzedek ("The House of Justice") is the Scarlet Letter of the Los Angeles Jewish/Legal community under the current crisis," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "and recently he has been repeatedly, cynically exploiting the memory of the holocaust to kosher himself as Mr Jewish Justice."

In the latest episode, Mr Samuels is sponsoring a symposium, to be held at the University of California, Los Angeles, Faculty Center, under the title "Law, Justice, and the Holocaust".

Indisputable evidence was repeatedly produced of criminality by SANDOR SAMUELS, former Chief Legal Counsel of Countrywide and former Associate General Counsel of Bank of America:

Massive fraud on the US tax payer, on shareholders, and on homeowners - as the key architect of Countrywide's "streamlining" of banking regulation.

Corruption of the courts and the legal profession - as part of the ongoing epidemic of fraud in the courts in real estate, mortgage and banking matters.

As Chief Legal Officer of Countrywide Financial Corporation and later Associate General Counsel of Bank of America Corporation, Sandor Samuels was:

Starting at least in the early 2000s - key figure in establishing corrupt organization practices in Countrywide, with an unprecedented fraud on the US tax payer, on shareholders, and on homeowners nationwide;

Starting in the early 2000s – key figure in corruption of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles and the US District Court, Central District of California;

\Starting March 2007 – central figure in conduct amounting to racketeering in the Los Angeles Superior Court, on the grounds of Bet Tzedek, as President of Bet Tzedek; [[i]]

In January 2008 – directly responsible for the collapse of Countrywide, following the publication of news of fraud through the filing of “Recreated Letters” as evidence in the US Bankruptcy Court in PA by Countrywide’s attorneys. [[ii]]

In March 2008 – directly responsible for the fraud in the US District Court, TX by attorneys for Countrywide, and a Memorandum Opinion by the Hon Judge Jeff Bohm, documenting similar conduct by Countrywide in courts throughout the United States. [[iii]]

Starting July 2008 – directly responsible for implementing similar conduct in Bank of America. [[iv]]

2010 – key figure in Human Rights Alert’s report, which was incorporated into the United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report, with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”. [[v]]

The Los Angeles Jewish Federation and Bet Tzedek have been repeatedly requested, since 2007, to initiate grievance procedures against Samuels and others in Bet Tzedek. [[vi]] Both refuse to respond.

In the meanwhile, Samuels continues to serve on the boards of other Los Angeles Jewish institutions as well:

Adat Ari-El Synagogue

American Jewish University, Los Angeles

Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies

Shalhevet School

The synergistic corruption of the US justice system and US financial institutions is at the heart of the current crisis. [[vii]] Sandor Samuels, one of the key architects of the corruption, is now re-inventing himself as Mr Jewish Justice.

“Public corruption is properly reserved for describing corruption in full public view. Sandor Samuels is a fine example,” concludes Dr Zernik.Note: All releases, pertaining to Bet Tzedek and the Los Angeles Jewish Federation are copied to the Anti-Defamation League, to Bet Tzedek, and the Los Angeles Jewish Federation, as a request for comments. No comments were returned so far.

LINKS[i] 10-06-11 Call for Accountability by the Jewish Community for Rampant Fraud at Los Angeles Superior Courthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/32918651/
10-10-05 The Los Angeles Jewish legal community again asked to assume accountability for conduct of Bet Tzedek “The House of Justice”http://www.scribd.com/doc/38696210/
10-10-11 Holly Fujie and Bet Tzedek the Los Angeles Jewish Legal Community Again Asked to Assume Accountability for Conduct of Bet Tzedek The House of Justicehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/39099300/
11-03-17 No shame left in the Los Angeles Jewish Community; Countrywide’s Sandor Samuels is again President of Bet Tzedek - “The House of Justice”http://www.scribd.com/doc/50960691/
11-06-06 PRESS RELEASE: Bet Tzedek – the Los Angeles “House of Justice” - a Jewish Justice Celebration!http://www.scribd.com/doc/57205711/[ii] 08-01-08 Case of Borrower Hills (01-22574) - in the US Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh. Countrywide's Three "Recreated Letters" and a Transcripthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/25003494/[iii] 08-03-05 Case of Borrower William Parsley (05-90374), Dkt #248: Judge Jeff Bohm's Memorandum Opinion, rebuking Countrywide's litigation practices, Countrywide's false outside counsel scheme - appearances by counsel who are not Counsel of Record, with "no communications with clients" clause:http://www.scribd.com/doc/25001966/[iv] 10-05-05 Countrywide, Bank of America [NYSE;BAC], and its President Brian Moynihan Compilation of Records Evidence of Racketeeringhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/30975368/
10-05-05 Chairs of US Congress Committees of the Judiciary and Banking Are Requested to Join Senator Feinstein's Inquiries on Comptroller of the Currencyhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/30979882/
10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office Los Angeles Against Moynihan Bank of America [NYSE:BAC] Bryan Cave LLP Alleging Racketeeringhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/
10-07-06 Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, Against Brian Moynihan, Bank of America [NYSE:BAC], Bryan Cave LLP, Alleging Racketeering and Large Scale Financial Institution Fraudhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/33971099/[v] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/[vi] See [i], above.[vii] 11-08-08 PRESS RELEASE: Fraud and Corruption in the US Courts are Tightly Linked to Failing Banking Regulation and the Global Economic Crisis – presentation in the 16th World Criminology Congress, Japanhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/62153608/___________Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______Flag Counter:128http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/Total Reads: 686,060Followers: 1,239http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://twitter.com/inproperinlahttp://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345Total Item Views:585,338http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
* Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continueCNN (April 7, 2011)* About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 millionby 2013Bloomberg (January 2011)
* "...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California." United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE CONDITIONS IN THE PRISON IN MONROE COUNTY, TENESSEE?* "What goes on there is more like gulags of centuries ago."ACLUhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/72546279/_____________________________WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?* "More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/_____________________________WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* "The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/_____________________________WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/____________________________As part of efforts for the preservation of our civilization for future generations:

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/