Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on December
13, 2010. Newcomers look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com
web site and help yourselves, there are hundreds of audio talks you can
download for free. All the sites you’ll see listed there are the official
sites that I have. They all carry transcripts in English of a lot of the talks;
you can download them as well and print them up, pass them around to your
friends. If you want to get transcripts in other languages, you can go
into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
and you will find a variety of languages to choose from there. So help
yourselves. Remember too, you have to keep me going. Please buy the
books, CDs and DVDs that I have for sale on my web sites. That’s the way I get through.
I don’t ask the advertisers for money, or they don’t ask me anymore –actually,
I have had a few offers recently but I’d have to bring them on as guests and
I’d be fooling you with an hour’s ad. The ads you hear on this show are
paid by the advertisers directly to RBN to pay for the air time, and their
staff and equipment and the broadcast and their bills. So help me out
with mine and purchase the items you will find at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.]
Donations are accepted, just straight donations. It doesn’t matter if
it’s a dollar or two dollars, whatever a month, because if everyone, or even
half of the folk, even a quarter of the folk who listen sent in that every
month I wouldn’t have the worries I have now with all these sites I’ve got up
and so on, and the costs and bills, etc. It’s up to you if you want to
keep me going.

This
is alternate news. I go into the mainstream too but I break it down and
show you what they are really meaning, by adding additional information which
the media happens to cut out so that you don’t get the full picture. Of
course you think you are informed but in reality you’ve just been conned by
getting half a story or half the facts to do with any particular story. The
media is an essential arm of government. That’s why media barons get
knighted… for doing a darn good job in going along with the big world
agenda. Not the world agenda that most folk think; it’s not just sort of
Marxist and so on. It’s a new system where the big banking boys and their
minions underneath them, all countries' minions, all tops of the minions I
should say, are on board. They fill their own pockets, naturally, for
their families, for here and ever to come, with a lavish lifestyle as they
bring down not just the working classes, the middle class too must be
eradicated. They have said in this new age of global managers.
That’s really what we are living through right now, is the age of global
management. The UN was set up to do this task with all the help from the
non-governmental organizations, set up and funded by you the taxpayer –
that’s where a lot of the money comes from. Basically, it's your own
demise you are paying for. You don’t know you are doing it because your
governments won’t generally tell you. But you can find out how much your
own government gives to the radical groups. And they must be RADICAL, for
radical change. That’s how you get their big grants, for these tax-free
NGOs. I'll be back with more after this break.

Hi
folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking
about the real world. The real world is very hard to get a hold of
because it’s so elusive and the job of mainstream media is to make it
elusive and to give you simplistic, nondescript answers on any particular major
topic. They want you to float through life, without objection, causing your
masters the least problems as possible. Their job is also to misinform you so
you think you are informed, and all of you and your friends will chat
about misinformation, and that’s how it really works. People think if we
are all chatting the same data we are all sane and it must be true. Of
course it never occurs to you that you are being told maybe half the facts on
anything so that you will come to the desired conclusion. So technically,
you are insane. [Alan laughing.] Technically you are insane.

This
con at Cancun is quite something else because it’s just one of many world
United Nations meetings they have had before. Remember, the UN was set up
by bankers and the big foundation boys like Rockefeller and the Milner Group in
London, England, which became the Royal Institute of International Affairs,
which has the American branch called the Council on Foreign Relations.
They have literally run the whole last century and they are running this
century as well. They draft up the treaties for amalgamations of countries into
blocs, like the European Union; they drafted it up. They also drafted up
the one for the North American amalgamation as well; they came on television in
2005, as the Council on Foreign Relations and told us that. The
guy who led them off then was Axworthy, I think his name was. He had been
the assistant or vice Prime Minister of Canada, who also was a member of the
CFR; no conflict there of course. No conflict at all, is there?

That’s
how you are run, by stealth and deception because this is a big old, old
plan. Carroll Quigley went through it. He said eventually the parallel governments will run
the world. It has been already. The parallel government
consists of non-governmental organizations which consist of armies of
followers and a bunch of high paid people at the top, who live in skyscrapers,
they have full-time pensions, and they call themselves charities. They
are run by the foundations and the foundations are part of the big parallel
government that Quigley talked about. They don’t have to ask permission
to do anything that they want to do. It’s always under the guise of charity,
you see, and doing good, for the world,
and no one questions them. They’ve got a form of immunity. But
remember, their members are members of the Council on Foreign Relations.
And the Council on Foreign Relations also put politicians in, at the top, of
ALL parties as well. That is explained in Tragedy and Hope and The
Anglo-American Establishment by Professor Carroll Quigley, who was the
official historian for that group.

Cancun
is about the redistribution of wealth, one of the planks of The Communist
Manifesto. If you didn’t know, read The Communist Manifesto.
It’s not difficult to read; it’s very simplistic, written by an idiot called
Karl Marx, at least he got the credit for it – many years after it was out he
then actually put his name on it. He was funded by Mr Rothschild in
Britain and other big bankers as well. It’s the redistribution of wealth
that was their main objective here and they have been successful.
Everybody has heard, I’m sure, how much money that YOU will all have to fork
out to what they claim is to the poorer nations. So the bankrupt nations
have to fork out cash to the poorer nations to bring them up to a higher living
standard, as you go down. I told you that years ago, that was always what
they’d said at the United Nations. One of the people who attended it was
Christopher Monckton. You have all heard of him of course, who broke
ranks with the aristocracy and came forward and talked about it. In this
article he said…

It is democracy, that will perish from the Earth
unless this burgeoning nonsense is stopped

I usually add some
gentle humor when I report. Not today. Read this and weep. Notwithstanding the
carefully-orchestrated propaganda to the effect that nothing much will be
decided at the UN climate conference here in Cancun, the decisions to be made
here this week signal nothing less than the abdication of the West. (Alan:
It’s over.) The governing class in what was once proudly known as the
Free World is silently, casually letting go of liberty, prosperity, and even
democracy itself. No one in the mainstream media will tell you this, not so
much because they do not see as because they do not bl**dy care.

The 33-page Note
(FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/CRP.2) by the Chairman of the “Ad-Hoc Working Group on
Long-Term Co-operative Action under the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change”, entitled Possible elements of the outcome, reveals all. Or,
rather, it reveals nothing, (A: See, they write in such obscure
language. It’s all bureaucratese… and it’s always a deception. He
goes on to explain this here.) unless one understands what the
complex, obscure jargon means. All UNFCCC documents at the Cancun conference,
specifically including Possible elements of the outcome, are drafted with what
is called “transparent impenetrability”. (A: …so you can’t see through
it. Transparent, it’s an oxymoron, you see.) The intention is
that the documents should not be understood, but that later we shall be
told they were in the public domain all the time, so what are we complaining
about?

Since the Chairman’s
note is very long, I shall summarize the main points:

Finance:

Western countries
will jointly provide $100 billion a year(A: …a year… the
ones that are all bankrupt, have to borrow money to give to this organization,
$100 billion…) by 2020 to an unnamed new UN Fund. (A: They
won’t even tell you what it’s called yet.) To keep this sum up with
GDP growth, the West may commit itself to pay 1.5% of GDP to the UN each year.
That is more than twice the 0.7% of GDP that the UN has recommended the West to
pay in foreign aid for the past half century. Several hundred of the provisions
in the Chairman’s note will impose huge financial costs on the nations of the
West.

The world-government
Secretariat:

In all but name, the
UN Convention’s Secretariat will become a world government directly controlling
hundreds of global, supranational, regional, national and sub-national
bureaucracies. It will receive the vast sum of taxpayers’ money ostensibly
paid by the West to the Third World for adaptation to the supposed adverse
consequences of imagined (and imaginary) “global warming”. (A:
It’s amazing. This is the coldest winter we have had for years; they’ve got the
troops out on the streets in Britain to help with the snow. I woke up
this morning to 4 feet drifts on my back door and had to dig my way out; it was
15 below last night with an arctic wind coming from the north.)

Bureaucracy:

Hundreds of new
interlocking bureaucracies answerable to the world-government Secretariat will
vastly extend its power and reach. In an explicit mirroring of the European
Union’s method of enforcing the will of its unelected Kommissars on the
groaning peoples of that benighted continent, the civil servants of nation
states will come to see themselves as servants of the greater empire of the
Secretariat, carrying out its ukases and diktats whatever the will of the
nation states’ governments. Many of the new bureaucracies are disguised as
“capacity-building in developing countries”. This has nothing to do with
growing the economies or industries of poorer nations. It turns out to mean the
installation of hundreds of bureaucratic offices answerable to the Secretariat
in numerous countries around the world. (A: So we are paying for
a massive bureaucracy. This is what it’s really about, to be set up in
all of these different countries, all answerable to the United Nations.
This is the takeover, folks. This is the official implementation of what
the United Nations was set up to do. This private organization, remember,
this United Nations, this corporation, this place without a country, that has
special status, is going to be, at least the initial name, for this world
government empire.) Who pays? You do, gentle taxpayer. Babylon,
Byzantium, the later Ottoman Empire, the formidable bureaucracy of Nazi
Germany, the vast empire of 27,000 paper-shufflers at the European Union: add
all of these together and multiply by 100 and you still do not reach the sheer
size, cost, power and reach of these new subsidiaries of the Secretariat.

In addition to
multiple new bureaucracies in every one of the 193 states parties to the
Convention, there will be an Adaptation Framework Body, a Least Developed
Countries’ Adaptation Planning Body, an Adaptation Committee, Regional Network
Centers, an International Center to Enhance Adaptation Research, National
Adaptation Institutions, a Body to Clarify Assumptions and Conditions in
National Greenhouse-Gas Emission Reductions Pledges, a Negotiating Body for an
Overall Level of Ambition for Aggregate Emission (A: That’s very
transparent, eh?) Reductions and Individual Targets, an Office to Revise
Guidelines for National Communications (A: So all of your
national communications are going to be under the United Nations folks.), a
Multilateral Communications Process Office, a Body for the Process to Develop
Modalities and Guidelines for the Compliance Process (A: That
will be fining and laws and all the rest of it.), a Registry of Nationally
Appropriate Mitigation Actions by Developed Countries, a Body to Supervise the
Process for Understanding Diversity of Mitigation Actions Submitted and Support
Needed, a Body to Develop Modalities for the Registry of Nationally Appropriate
Mitigation Actions, an Office of International Consultation and Analysis; an
Office to Conduct a Work Program for Development of Various Modalities and
Guidelines; a network of Developing Countries’ National Forest Strategy Action
Plan Offices; a network of National Forest Reference Emission Level And/Or
Forest Reference Level Bodies;

…and
it goes on and on… I can’t read it all. There are SO many of them. You
are looking at a WHOLE MASSIVE WORLD BUREAUCRACY… who will live high on the
hog; they don’t pay these guys peanuts. And you are paying for it
all. All of you who were told will owe, I don’t know, about half a
million dollars to a million dollars each, in debt, supposedly because of the
bank crashes and the government’s borrowing, have to pay for all of this.
And it’s nothing to do with greening the
planet as they say. It’s building up an incredible, massive army
for a government to control the whole world. I'll be back with more after
this break.

Hi
folks. We’re back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I’m
reading an article by Christopher Monckton who is laying it on the line as to
what this is all about. Remember it’s really set up by the same guys who
brought you the European Union, an idea of course that Karl Marx came up with
in the 1800s. He also wanted a United American bloc as well and a Far
Eastern bloc. Of course the Council on Foreign Relations have been
working quietly for over 100 years to make all of that happen. For those
who don’t know it, read Carroll Quigley’s books – I have mentioned them so many
times before. He was the historian for this organization, with unlimited
funding; that’s how these guys run, the big foundations. Eventually these
blocs were to be run by a super world government. Well this is what’s
happening now. You are seeing the rise of the phoenix, right in front of
you. It was designed a long time ago and they are overjoyed that it’s
coming up to its full power. They have all the departments that you have
in your own country. A department of agriculture and so on, they have a
separate one there that will be dishing out all of your laws on food and
eating, and consumption of energy and so on. He goes on to say in the
article…

The world
government’s powers: (A: The WORLD GOVERNMENT’S POWERS…
for the hard of thinking… )

The Secretariat will
have the power not merely to invite nation states to perform their obligations
under the climate-change Convention, but to compel them to do so. (A:
They will have legal force.) Nation states are to be ordered to
collect, compile and submit vast quantities of information, (A:
That’s on all of you too, every one of you.) in a manner and form to
be specified by the secretariat and its growing army of subsidiary bodies.
Between them, they will be given new powers to verify the information, to
review it and, on the basis of that review, to tell nation states what they
can and cannot do.

Continuous
expansion:

The verb “enhance”,
in its various forms, occurs at least 28 times in the Chairman’s note, Similar
verbs, such as “strengthen” and “extend”, and adjectives such as “scaled-up”,
“new” and “additional”, are also frequently deployed, particularly in relation
to funding at the expense of Western taxpayers. If all of the “enhancements”
proposed in the note were carried out, the cost would comfortably exceed the
annual $100 billion (or, for that matter, the 1.5% of GDP) that the note
mentions as the cost to the West over the coming decade.

Intellectual
property in inventions:

Holders of patents,
particularly in fields related to “global warming” and its mitigation, will be
obliged to transfer the benefits of their inventiveness to developing countries
without payment of royalties. This is nowhere explicitly stated in the
Chairman’s note, but the transfer of technology is mentioned about 20 times in
the draft, suggesting that the intention is still to carry out the explicit
provision in the defunct Copenhagen Treaty draft of 15 September 2009 to this
effect. (A: What it will be too, as they get us all off
the road over here – and that is part of Agenda 21/Millennial
Project/sustainable development to get you off the road – I guess we can give
our cars to the third world countries so that they can scoot around a bit and
have fun, while the gasoline lasts.)

Insurance:

The Secretariat
proposes, in effect, to interfere so greatly in the operation of the worldwide
insurance market that it will cease to be a free market, with the usual
severely adverse consequences to everyone in that market.

The free market:

The failed
Copenhagen Treaty draft stipulated that the “government” that would be
established would have the power to set the rules of all formerly free
markets. There would be no such thing as free markets any more. In Cancun,
the Chairman’s note merely says that various “market mechanisms” may be
exploited by the Secretariat and by the parties to the Convention: but
references to these “market mechanisms” are frequent enough to suggest that the
intention remains to stamp out free markets worldwide. (A:
That is the intention. It’s like ‘free trade’ that comes from the United
Nations too, set up by the Royal Institute of International Affairs,
London. It’s not free at all. They decide who gets to trade and who
doesn’t. Of course it’s always the big internationals, because they are
all members of the same organization.)

Knowledge is power:

The Chairman’s note
contains numerous references to a multitude of new as well as existing obligations
on nation states to provide information to the Secretariat, in a form and
manner which it will dictate. The hand of the EU is very visible here. It
grabbed power from the member-states in four stages: first, acting merely as a
secretariat to ensure stable supplies of coal and steel to rebuild Europe after
the Second World War; then as a registry requiring member states to supply it
with ever more information; then as a review body determining on the basis of
the information supplied by the member states whether they were complying with
their obligations on the ever-lengthier and more complex body of European
treaties; and finally as the ultimate law-making authority, to which all
elected parliaments, explicitly including the European “Parliament”, were and
are subject. Under the Cancun proposals, the Secretariat is following the path
that the plague of EU officials here have no doubt eagerly advised it to
follow. (A: It’s the same format, they are telling you, that set
up the EU super parliament, the super soviet parliament. That’s how they
are doing it. They never change something that works, you see. Why
change it, it worked the last time, on that group.) It is now taking
numerous powers not merely to require information from nation states but to hold
them to account for their supposed international obligations under the
climate-change Convention on the basis of the information the nations are now
to be compelled to supply.

Propaganda:

The Chairman’s note
contains several mentions of the notion that the peoples of the world need to
be told more about climate change. Here, too, there is a parallel with the EU,
which administers a propaganda fund of some $250 million a year purely to
advertise its own wonderfulness to an increasingly skeptical population. (A:
This is just the Soviet Union folks.) The IPCC (A:
Whose chairman is a train engineer…) already spends millions every year
with PR agencies, asking them to find new ways of making its blood-curdling
message more widely understood and feared among ordinary people. The
Secretariat already has the advantage of an uncritical, acquiescent,
scientifically illiterate, economically innumerate and just plain dumb news
media: now it will have a propaganda fund to play with as well. (A:
Back with more of this incredible piece after this break.)

Hi
folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. I let the
guitar wail on there because it’s kind of a wailing night. It’s one thing
to know this stuff coming down, and you have studied it for so long, nothing
takes you by surprise. Nothing at all, unfortunately, takes you by
surprise; you know what’s coming up. You have read all their papers, all
their agendas, and these guys mean business. They have never ever gone
back on any particular agenda, especially the big important ones to do with
world government and the planned society. I’ll put all these links up of
the articles I mention up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the
show, once I start uploading.

Here
is another one too that I’ll put up, from The Guardian. Now, the
Guardian, it’s almost an arm of the United Nations. It’s comprised really
of the Trotskyist communist group and that’s what really runs a lot of this at
the bottom level, the working groups. They are Trotskyists in nature,
what they call non-ceasing revolution
is what they are really saying, speeding up the evolution of where the planet
would go if it was left to its own devices. So they are just taking
shortcuts and forcing on the evolution into a society with little sustained
communities, communitarian living, and all under the super government of the
United Nations. They go on with their usual dripping stuff and lies and
so on, this particular bunch in this article on climate change.

They
are also going into depopulation, because behind the whole environment
movement… You’ve got to remember in the 70s and the 60s they never talked about
the weather. It hadn’t hit them then. I was the Club of Rome, one
of their think tanks, that came up with the idea of global warming. They
said, that would fit the bill, to
make the world change in their direction. So they did lie and they keep
lying about it, as the world is freezing. It doesn’t matter as long as
they get it all through. So they are now back to their REAL goal, the
real goal, again, is massive depopulation. This article really praises Malthus
and so on, and it says, my God, look at
all the people on the planet. Then they go on to the Western
nations, whose home populations have been dropping, plummeting for many, many,
many years, and the United Nations itself has to admit that. But they
also want massive immigration to give you the appearance that you are
overcrowded. That’s how they have been doing that for years too.
I’ll put that one up as well for you to peruse.

Climate change: human numbers don't add up

Peter Preston / guardian.co.uk / Sunday 12 December
2010

For
those in America who think nothing much is happening and they haven’t heard
much more about the free trade negotiations into the amalgamation part of it at
least, with the amalgamated Americas. No, not true at all. They
haven’t mentioned they had their 5th meeting this year, a very
important one. They have been signing agreements with the President of
the US, the Prime Minister of Canada and Mexico for the last 5 years, openly,
in public now. They had dozens of them done in secrecy leading up to 2005
but the latest one is to do with really amalgamation. It says here, if
you really understand what they are saying…

Tories (A: That’s the conservative
party, in power at the moment, at least the front men.) to announce deal forming North America
'perimeter'

Jason Kryk/Postmedia News / nationalpost.com /
nationalpost.com

(A: Now,
they had that out in 2005 too; they called it Fortress America. From that
deal, that signatory when they all got together at Waco and signed the deal,
they started integrating even the taxes on imports, with the two countries
sharing them. They also said that high-level bureaucrats in Canada could
apply for high-level bureaucratic jobs in Washington DC and vice-versa.
We are integrating you see. The FBI, CSIS in Canada, and the RCMP, could
share the same crime databases and the same immigration databases at the
borders and so on. In other words, they are sharing all the data
together. We ARE integrated. When they integrate economics, and
your privacy laws go out the window, and you are all sharing the same
computers, on every citizen of the three countries, you are amalgamated.
So here is the latest one.)

Tories to announce deal forming North America
'perimeter'…

(A: So just
like the UN, they give you doublespeak, they give you obscure language – which
always means a lot more than what they are telling you.)

A
soon-to-be-announced security and trade deal between Canada and the United
States is designed, in part, to allow people and goods to flow more freely
within the continent. (A: So that’s for the general people at
the bottom: Oh, that’s nice, you
know, that’s pretty good eh... how’s the Jays doin’ eh.
Anyway… then they go on to the real story.)

"The
Conservative government is set to announce a landmark security (A:
It’s “a landmark security”, remember…) and trade deal with the United
States, designed to create a perimeter around North America and allow people
and goods to flow more freely across the border.

Sources suggested
that Prime Minister Stephen Harper and President Barack Obama will sign
the broad-ranging agreement in Washington as early as next month. (A:
See, they are doing this the same as Britain always did it. They give you
the press release in advance of it happening, because you see, it’s a done
deal. All they turn up to do is have a big feast, just like they do at
Cancun, and sign the deals. All the bureaucrats have been working for a
year before; they call them ‘Sherpas’ by the way, the guys who go back and
forward for a year or two, arranging all the deals, drafting up the stuff they
all agree on, and then they have their big parties and that’s the ones you hear
about, where they stuff themselves with 14-course meals, have lots of brandy,
they hire prostitutes male and female to serve the dignitaries of the various
countries. That is a fact; it’s been in the paper. Back to the
story.)

“It’s big on ideals
but maybe not so great on details,” (A: No, it won’t. You won’t
hear the details until, just like the Cancun and Christopher Monckton said,
about 1 year, maybe 5 years later.) said one person familiar with the
negotiations. “But it does use the word ‘perimeter’ many times...The question
is, will it reduce the compliance burden at the Canada-U.S. border?” (A:
No. We’re all one now, really. You see.)

The New Border
Vision is being billed as a 21st century border management system that will include
new common consumer product regulations (A: That’s where all your ID,
the Smart ID comes in; they’ve got them in all the other countries in Europe
already.), a pre-clearance agreement for goods crossing the border to
expedite waiting times and the use of advanced technology to utilize biometric
data for travelers at airports and land crossings, according to people familiar
with the plan. (A: Now, the British government tried to
introduce this same ID card before 9/11 happened, a couple of years before
it. It was stated on the show, that it contains all of your biometric
data, medical records, stuff that you are not allowed to know as well, that the
government has on you, whatever it happens to be. It’s also to be your
bank card eventually. They are already using this system in a few
countries in Europe. So it’s a banking card, total ID card, and
everything, and it’s got an active chip in it by the way, for tracking.
That was explained in Canada, when they did the trial of this particular card
in 2008 on a CBC, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation show called, As It Happens,
on radio. They used Burnaby BC as a testing ground for it. They always
test it out first in an area or a city.)

The new framework
will likely be discussed when the U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton,
visits Ottawa this Monday but government sources said the announcement will not
be made by Ms. Clinton. A spokesman for the Public Safety Minister, Vic Toews, (A:
Vic Toews… I wonder if he can stretch down?) said: “No such announcement is
planned. We don’t comment on hearsay or speculation.” A spokeswoman for the
U.S. Embassy in Ottawa refused to comment. (A: It’s all public
relations. We can’t get straight answers from anybody; it all goes
through public relations.)

Colin Robertson, a
senior research fellow with the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute,
said the agreement is an attempt by the Canadian government to link security to
improved access to the U.S. for Canadians. (A: That’s what he’s
telling you. But this guy belongs to a military contractor. So, who
are you going to believe?)

“‘Perimeter’ is a
vital word because back in the Chrétien government days we couldn’t use it
because we would get caught up in the sovereignty allergy we too often have,” he
said. (A: So, we’re okay to accept loss of sovereignty
now, he’s telling you. The “sovereignty allergy”?... People fought
world wars to keep their sovereignty. Now it’s an allergy. It’s so last century to believe in a nation
isn’t it? So this character goes on to say…) “It makes a lot of
sense.” (A: …to have it.)

The U.S. announced a
similar deal with Mexico in March. (A: What a coincidence, eh?) It
included moves to expedite travel and commerce such as secure transit lanes for
pre-cleared rail and truck shipments, as well as passenger pre-clearance for
individuals.

The U.S. and Canada
have taken piecemeal steps to coordinate their efforts against common threats
like terrorism. Last year, Canada signed on to the NEXUS membership card and Free
and Secure Trade (FAST) trusted traveller programs as a valid means of
identification at the border. However, more sweeping agreements have foundered
in the past, notably the Security and Prosperity Partnership (A: Well,
that went down with the bankers, eh, when the banks went down.) agreement
signed in 2005 by former Prime Minister Paul Martin, ex-U.S. President George
W. Bush and former Mexican President Vicente Fox.

So,
that’s the end of sovereignty folks, if you can’t figure that out. You
have to do a little more digging to find out what they are really on about
because it’s the loss of sovereignty. We already know that US police can
come across the border in Canada now to arrest people and vice-versa
apparently. Just like Europe. Just the Europol in Europe. The
same thing. I tell you, what can you do? You are not run by
governments that represent you. They’re all shows owned by the same guys
who own the foundations, because they’ve had this in the works for over 100 years,
this amalgamation. They set up the House of the Americas in Washington DC
in 1912 I think it was, whose goal it was to amalgamate the Americas.
Massive buildings, you should have a look at it on the internet.

I’m
also putting up a link to do with TSA scanners…

Inside TSA scanners: How terahertz waves tear apart
human DNA

Terrence Aym / helium.com

…for
anybody who cares. I think that most folk don’t really care these days… if they
are going to end up with cancers and so on and how it’s literally disrupting
the DNA in the cell itself, as they go through them. I’ll put this link
up as well for you perusal. Also I want to touch on another that I’ll put
up as well. It’s called…

Navy Research Paper:

‘Disrupt Economies’ with Man-Made ‘Floods,’ ‘Droughts’

By Noah Shachtman / wired.com / February 11, 2008

(A: This is
an old Wired document actually, 2008.)

A recently-unearthed
U.S. Navy research project calls for creating mad-made floods and droughts to
"disrupt [the] economy" of an enemy state. (A: That’s
weather warfare. I’ve touched on weather warfare before and the treaties
that were signed back in the 70s at the United Nations by the United States,
Britain and a whole bunch of other countries. They already HAD it then,
that’s why you SIGN an agreement and a treaty because you’d already got them
back then.)

"Weather
modification was used successfully in Viet Nam (A: That’s true.
That was an easier way of doing it then, a more primitive way.) to (among
other things) hinder and impede the movement of personnel and material from
North Viet Nam to South Viet Nam," notes a Naval Air Warfare Weapons
Division – China Lake research proposal, released last month through the
Freedom of Information Act. But "since that time military research
on Weather Modification has dwindled in the United States." (A:
Well, it’s not dwindled; we see the skies getting sprayed every day.)

The proposal
suggests a study of the latest weather manipulation techniques, to "give
the U.S. military a viable, state-of-the-art weather modification capability again."
(A: …that means, more of…) With that in hand, American
forces would be able…

To impede or deny
the movement of personnel and material because of rains-floods, snow-blizzards,
etc. (A: Amazing, this morning, as I say, you dig out
under 4 feet of snow and 15 degrees below freezing, and you see all these
contrails, these CHEMtrails up in the sky, all across the sky, and they kept
doing it all day. Once the clouds disappeared that’s all you saw.
But I guess that’s just a coincidence. That’s just paranoid thinking
connecting those two, isn’t it?)

(2) To disrupt
economy due to the effect of floods, droughts, etc.

The proposal is
undated. But it’s pretty clearly from the Cold War.

Not only is
"the Soviet Union (Russia)" mentioned. The money is also
relatively small, by today’s standards — less than a half-million dollars, over
two years. (A: It will be getting billions now.)

A military in-house
newspaper calls "weather modification" an "area of China
Lake preeminence. Between 1949 and 1978, China Lake developed
concepts, techniques, and hardware that were successfully used in hurricane
abatement (A: By the way, they can also CREATE hurricanes with it,
because that’s also in the treaty at the United Nations. Look up all the
different treaties they have signed since 1970 on this.), fog control, and
drought relief (A: They can give you floods. They can also cause
droughts.). Military application of this technology was demonstrated in
1966 when Project Popeye was conducted to enhance rainfall to help interdict
traffic on the Ho Chi Minh Trail." (A: That’s what they
did. They flooded it so much that the cong couldn’t get through; they were
squandering in the mud.)

In 1980, the United
States ratified a treaty banning military weather manipulation. (A:
But they can do it on their own folks. Every treaty you sign at the
United Nations excludes that; you can use it on your own people. For
instance in warfare, they all agreed years ago not to use hollow point bullets;
from even the days of the League of Nations into the United Nations they’ve had
that on the books. But you can use hollow point bullets on your own
citizenry, by the police. Same thing, you can use weather warfare on your
own people but not abroad they say.) But every once in a while,
someone in the armed forces floats the idea of doing it again. "Our
vision is that by 2025 the military could influence the weather (A:
They’ve had that ability on a long scale.) on a mesoscale
[theater-wide] or microscale [immediate local area] to achieve operational
capabilities," a 1996 Air Force-commissioned study reads.

They’ve
had that for years folks. They’ve had that for years on the go and we see
the effects of it too. They hoped to initially cause global warming by
putting out the polymer stuff that you were seeing back in 98, 99, up to about
2003. That was that hazy blue stuff; it was like looking through
polythene. Of course what it did was really act like a magnifying glass,
intensify the sun’s rays. Then they started spraying the other stuff,
which has even worse effects on the lungs, etc, for those who are underneath
it, but that’s just the way it goes.

I’ve
talked about them getting people off the land, Agenda 21/Millennium
Project/Sustainable Development, all these terms used for the same thing.
Here is an article from Detroit.

In an interview with
the Free Press, Bing stressed that no resident would be forced to move, but
that those who remain in areas outside the population centers (A: See,
they are creating population centers for us all to be crammed in to.) "need
to understand that they're not going to get the kind of services they
require." (A: In other words, if you don’t move into
these areas they are not going to maintain your roads, they are not going to
maintain your water supply, your electricity. They will say it’s
‘unsustainable’.)

"We're going to
be encouraging them to move and put themselves in a better situation. (A:
Crowded amongst everybody else with their late night parties, and you’re up at
7 in the morning and all that stuff.) ... They are much better off moving
into a more dense area so that we can provide them with the services they need:
that would be water, sewer, lighting, public safety -- all of that," Bing
said. "We think that getting our city to be more dense with its population
is the right route." (A: Can you imagine the crime and the
shootings, and you are supposed to put up with that, and as I say, the nightly
parties and all that kind of stuff? Well, they know what it’s going to
cause. That’s why the cops are really just a battalion to go in there and
sort out all the rioting that will be happening inside of it, and all the
crime.)

The neighborhoods
targeted for investment, which the administration will identify by spring as
part of the Detroit Works Project, are relatively stable with some vacant and
foreclosed property. (A: Mind you, they can’t maintain it all
now, since all of your tax money, what’s left of it, is going abroad to help
the global warming crew and their massive bureaucracy for the world. I'll
be back with more after this break.)

Hi
folks. We’re back, Cutting Through The Matrix. We’ll go to the
callers and there is Jay from Ohio. Is Jay there?

Jay: Exactly, you know, coincidently, I’m trying
to make my own newsletter and weather modification is part of it. If you
just go and… the information is all there. It’s ridiculous.

Alan: Yes. It has been.

Jay: I listen to you every night and sometimes I
just feel like it’s just so hopeless. But then again I think… I like G
Edward Griffin’s description that you’ve got to take the long view of it
because the powers that be have taken hundreds of years to set this up.

Alan: This is the whole thing to it. It was
on the go before you were born, this agenda for the world government and all
the things that were to come with it too. Right down to even weather
modification to alter the planet, this was discussed way back in the 50s.
They used to have school subjects on this kind of stuff. The
Soviets put out stuff as well on weather modification, even putting solar
panels in the sky, in space, that would reflect sunlight back in some areas.
They even talked eventually they could have a great working population where
there would be no nighttime, and that was just a fantastic thing they
thought. It’s just astonishing we are living through it all and being
deceived, again, at the same time as they do it. Even when they are
telling us, oh we are going to do
geoengineering. Like they haven’t been doing it? You
know. It’s just such a joke. Sure.

Jay: It is. I know you work tirelessly to
get the information out. Do you think at some point, maybe, I don’t know,
in a few generations that by planting the seeds that you do, that a change can
at some point come? Because it seems like over all these years, hundreds
of years, these guys are unstoppable.

Alan: They’re unstoppable only because they’re
backed by the same guys who are international money lenders. These
characters, literally, can break an economy overnight; just two or three of
them like Soros. He’s done that in Britain before and boasted about it in
the newspaper how he did it. They can also raise nations up into higher
status and that’s what they are doing with India and Brazil. They are
going to make them higher, from third world countries up to first world
countries, or what used to be called first world, simply by putting our money
into their countries as we go down the tubes. That’s how you build
countries up, or sink them. You either put money in or you take it
out. That’s what they are doing now. It might take a long
time. It might take your back to the wall before people will start to ask
the right questions. When they are out of their comfort zone and they
can’t afford to live, or eat, or they are under the new Gestapo of
environmentalism, all of those things it might take before they start to talk
about these subjects seriously and do something about it.

Jay: I think that’s what it’s going to
take.

Alan: That’s what it would take. Yeah.
They’re just too comfortable right now. They haven’t had the effects
yet of what’s coming down and will be coming down, with massive taxes on
everything shortly. Thanks for calling in.

From
Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or
your Gods GO with you.