On May 7, 2012, at 16:00 , Paul Groth wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> It's an interesting comment about modeling the process. It's important
> to remember we don't represent eventualities in provenance only what
> has happened. So we would only model that W3C management agrees and a
> publication occurs.
>
That would be fine. I must admit I got a little bit lost when I tried to do that on where it is correct to put dates, for example...
Ivan
> We mention this somewhere but it's probably not clear enoughâ€¦
>
> Paul
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> I see that the Prov-DM uses the W3C publication process as an example. Some of the terms referred to in the document actually exist, better use those:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.rdf
>>
>> I know it is a bit sketchy, and should be updated, but it is a start. There is at least a class for WD, PR, etc.
>>
>> Challenge: model the whole W3C publication process with Prov-O... looking at this what I tried to describe (and I did not really succeed) is to interpret things like: a some publications occur only when the W3C management agrees, on a transition call, that the document is fine for publication (which is the case for, eg, Candidate Recommendations...)
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
> Artificial Intelligence Section
> Department of Computer Science
> VU University Amsterdam
>
----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf