Resumen (otros idiomas)

In ancient times the correlation between written language and spoken language cannot be interpreted as in contemporary society. Neither the literary sources nor the epigraphic information reach to reflect linguistic reality in a direct and faithful way. We must therefore assume that we know only a part of the total information. This premise, clearly generalizable, becomes a challenge to the study of the palaeohispanic languages, where one of the most exciting problems that arise is, without doubt, the identification of their signarios and the decipherment of their language. Although much progress has been made in the identification of the Iberian signs, the truth is that it is still more what we do not know that what we know with certainty. The creation, adoption, and formation of the Peninsular writings are the result of a voluntary decision, and therefore they take place by a certain motivation or need, even though it is now difficult to us to apprehend them. This motivation could be discerned in good measure from the documents themselves, but above all from the context in which they appear, and that has to do with the type of individuals that possess such knowledge. On this basis, the work establishes two fundamental goals: on the one hand, to analyze in depth one of our most serious problems in the study of all these phenomena, which is the lack of appropriate contextualization for the different findings. On the other hand, to analyze the anthropology or sociology of writing, and consider who, how and where someone spoke, or rather, wrote in the different palaeohispanic signarios in the area of peninsular Southeast. This thesis therefore transcends the object to try to respond to the premise: who writes what for whom...