I wish to take exception to the article entitled, “The crown crisis that could tear Thailand apart”, by Jonathan Manthorpe, published online in iPolitics on 13 April 2016. Not only is the story sensational and largely unsubstantiated by evidence, but there is also much to it that Thais would find offensive and unacceptable.

Right from the beginning, the writer shows his inclination to produce a work of fiction by alluding to the works of Shakespeare. As a play or novel, the article might make for some enthralling drama, but one would hope that a news article written about real-life persons and situations would bear some semblance to the truth.

Much of the article touches upon the institution of the monarchy in Thailand which, rather than “tear(ing) Thailand apart” as the writer maintains, has actually been the core spiritual pillar of Thai society dating back more than 700 years. It remains a unifying force that binds all Thais together regardless of their political beliefs. The monarchy has always remained above politics and has never taken sides in any political conflict. Any attempt to suggest otherwise is therefore totally misleading.

In an effort to back up his own somewhat misguided preconceptions, the writer relies on hearsay published elsewhere but unsupported by any evidence. One cannot help but wonder whether the principles of responsible journalism in Canada would allow a similar piece to be written freely about any political figures in this country.

While seemingly a subject of fascination to many foreigners, the Royal succession is not an issue in Thailand. His Royal Highness Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn has been proclaimed Heir to the Throne since 1972. There are clearly stipulated rules and procedures to govern succession, should the need ever arise. To speculate on how the issue would unfold or make any prejudgements based on rumour is therefore highly inappropriate.

With regard to political developments in Thailand, the article also paints a misguided picture. The political process remains in compliance with the roadmap towards a return to elected government announced by the current administration. At the end of March 2016, the Constitution Drafting Commission completed the final draft of a new constitution which took into account the proposals submitted by the people and government agencies in an inclusive manner. The underlying principles of the constitution are, among other things, to protect the people’s public interests and safeguard the rights and liberties of the people. A national referendum on this draft constitution is scheduled to be held on 7 August 2016 and, regardless of the outcome, the Prime Minister has affirmed that a general election would be held sometime next year.

In making my case to the (iPolitics) editorial board, I am aware of the disclaimer at the end of the article which indicates that the views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists are the author’s alone and do not reflect those of iPolitics. However, if iPolitics intends to stick to its guiding principle of being a venue where “the country’s unique political personalities and policy issues are reported fairly”, one would hope that the same yardstick also applies to reporting about other countries.