WEBVTT LALAWYLAWYERLAWYER ALAWYER ANDLAWYER AND ALAWYER AND A PLAWYER AND A PROLAWYER AND A PROSELAWYER AND A PROSECULAWYER AND A PROSECUTOLAWYER AND A PROSECUTORLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PILAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHILAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHINGLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHINGLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHINGLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHINGLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHINGLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHINGLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHINGLAWYER AND A PROSECUTOR PITCHINGTHEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THEIR CASE.THE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADTHE LAWYER FOR FORMER GUN SQUADDETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TODETECTUVE MARCUS TAYLOR TRIED TOPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFPICK AWAY AT THE CREDIBILITY OFTAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICETAYLOR’S FORMER POLICECOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOCOLLEAGUES IN THE SQUAD WHOTESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.TESTOFIED AGAINST HIM.RIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OFRIDICULOUS SHE CALLED A CLAIM OF, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HE, MAURICE WARD, WHO TESTIFIED HETHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN ATHREW AWAY $20,000 TAKEN IN AROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.ROBBERY RATHER THAN KEEP IT.EACH WITNESS, SHE SAID HADEACH WITNESS, SHE SAID HADEACH WITNESS, SHE SAID HADEACH WITNESS, SHE SAID HADEACH WITNESS, SHE SAID HADEACH WITNESS, SHE SAID HAD, BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE., BAGGAGE.REASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERREASONABLE DOUBT IS ALL OVERTHIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.THIS CASE, SHE SAID.IT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THEIT WALKED IN THE FRONT DOOR, THESIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.SIDE DOOR, AND THE BACK DOOR.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.THE LAWYER IS JENNIFER WICKS.DEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSDEFENSE LAWYER JENIFER WICKSSAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCESAYS THAT HE HOPES TO CONVINCETHE JURORS HE COMMITED TO MORETHE JURORS HE COMMITED TO MORETHE JURORS HE COMMITED TO MORETHE JURORS HE COMMITED TO MORETHE JURORS HE COMMITED TO MORETHE JURORS HE COMMITED TO MORETHE JURORS HE COMMITED TO MORETHAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.THAN THEFT.TAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISTAYLOR’S LAWYER ARGUED THERE ISLITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THELITTLE CORROBORATION OF THETESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURTESTIMONY PROVIDED BY FOURFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTFORMER DETECTIVES AND CURRENTAND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.AND FORMER DRUG DEALERS.THE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THETHE GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TO THEAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHAUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFY WITHDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDDEPTH OF THE CRIMINAL UNDERWORLDAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYAND AUTHORIZED THEM TO TESTIFYWITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID.WITH IMMUNITY WICKS SAID., IT IS DEPLORABLE AND, IT IS DEPLORABLE AND, IT IS DEPLORABLE AND, IT IS DEPLORABLE AND, IT IS DEPLORABLE AND, IT IS DEPLORABLE AND, IT IS DEPLORABLE ANDNAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.NAUSEATING.PROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEPROSECUTORS UNDERLINED THEALLEGATIONS AGAINT COPSALLEGATIONS AGAINT COPS............WHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDWHAT IS DEPLORABLE ANDNAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WERENAUSEATING IS NOT THAT THEY WEREEXPOSED, BUT THAT THEY DID THOSEEXPOSED, BUT THAT THEY DID THOSEEXPOSED, BUT THAT THEY DID THOSEEXPOSED, BUT THAT THEY DID THOSEEXPOSED, BUT THAT THEY DID THOSEEXPOSED, BUT THAT THEY DID THOSEEXPOSED, BUT THAT THEY DID THOSEEXPOSED, BUT THAT THEY DID THOSELEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.LEO WISE SAID.THINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZEDTHINGS THE PROSECUTOR CRITICIZED, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLING, DEFENSE LAWYERS GRILLINGWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWITBNESS WHO WERE DRUG DEALERSWHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHO TESTFIED THEY’D BEEN ROBBED.WHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSWHETHER THEY WERE SELLING DRUGSOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISEOR GIRL SCOUT COOKIES, LEO WISETOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTERTOLD JURORS IT DOESN’T MATTER,JAYNE: THE JURORS WILL RESUME,JAYNE: THE JURORS WILL RESUME,JAYNE: THE JURORS WILL RESUME,JAYNE: THE JURORS WILL RESUME,JAYNE: THE JURORS WILL RESUME,JAYNE: THE JURORS WILL RESUMEON MONDAY.ON MONDAY.ON MONDAY.ON MONDAY.ON MONDAY.ON MONDAY.ON MONDAY.ON MONDAY.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.NOT TOMORROW.SOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOSOME EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT TOMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AMEET TOMORROW WOULD BE AHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISHARDSHIP AS THIS CASE ISNORMALLY MET MONDAY THROUGHNORMALLY MET MONDAY THROUGHNORMALLY MET MONDAY THROUGHNORMALLY MET MONDAY THROUGHNORMALLY MET MONDAY THROUGHNORMALLY MET MONDAY THROUGHTHURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THURSDAY.THIS, THEY ARE HERE FIRST THINGTHIS, THEY ARE HERE FIRST THINGTHIS, THEY ARE HERE FIRST THINGTHIS, THEY ARE HERE FIRST THING

Wicks and prosecutor Leo Wise choked up a bit in their closing arguments.

Taylor is the youngest and least experienced of the former Baltimore police gun squad detectives accused of robbery, extortion and overtime fraud. In asking jurors to exonerate, Wicks argued every witness against him has baggage.

Wicks said "reasonable doubt is all over this case ... walked in the front door of the courthouse, the side door, the back door." Wicks further said that the government went "to depths of criminal underworld " for its witnesses, referencing four convicted gun squad members and drug dealers who testified.

Wicks said of the testimony of former gun squad members Momodu Gondo and Jemell Rayam, "The government has gone to the depths of the criminal underworld and authorized them to testify with immunity It is deplorable and nauseating."

Wicks said Gondo and Rayam each accused the other of murder from the witness stand.

In testimony, Rayam said Gondo had "laid someone out." Gondo said Rayam committed "cold-blooded murder" when he shot a man during traffic stop. He was later cleared.

Wicks argued that they will get rewarded with lighter sentences for their testimony against Hersl and Taylor.

Wicks pointed out that the government presented no cellphone evidence to corroborate a meeting at Taylor's house to split up money after an alleged robbery, which was a critical allegation in the case.

In closing rebuttal, federal prosecutors said of Hersl and Taylor: "They were supposed to be sentinels guarding this city from people who break the law. Instead, they became hunters."

Prosecutors said, "What is nauseating and deplorable is not that it was exposed in court, but that they did those things." Prosecutors criticized defense lawyers for disparaging witnesses who are or were drug dealers, who testified that gun squad detectives robbed them. Prosecutors said that whether they "were selling drugs or Girl Scout cookies, it doesn't matter."

"This case isn't a case against all cops. It is a case against criminals who hid behind a badge," a prosecutor said.

Hersl and Taylor are accused of a racketeering conspiracy involving the now defunct Gun Trace Task Force. Hersl is accused in five robberies and Taylor in four. Both are accused of stealing through overtime fraud.

"These men were not hard at work to rid the city of guns. They were hardly working," a prosecutor said.

"The main question is whether Hersl's activity amounts to robbery," Purpura said. "Is it wrong? It's dead wrong. But it's not extortion, it's not robbery."

Closing arguments lasted total of six hours over two days. Jurors started deliberating around 1 p.m. They will return Monday morning to resume deliberation.

The judge said some jurors indicated it would be a hardship to meet on Friday as the usual schedule in this case was Monday through Thursday. Thus, the decision to reconvene Monday.

Judge says some jurors in BPD GTTF corruption case indicated it would be a hardship to meet on Friday as the usual schedule in this case was Mon thru Thursday. Thus the decision to reconvene Monday. Jurors deliberated about 4 and a half hrs today

Fed prosecutors: "What is nauseating & deplorable is not that it was exposed in court but that they did those things.." part of closing in case against Fmr BPD Gun Squad detectives Daniel Hersl and Marcus Taylor..charged with robbery and extortion and OT fraud

"Nauseating and deplorable" Marcus Taylor def atty said of testimony of Momodu Gondo and Jemell Rayam.."each fingered the other for murder".."biased for the gov't because they don't want to get charged w/murder"

"Reasonable doubt is all over this case..walked in the front door of the courthouse, the side door, the back door." Def Atty for Fmr BPD Gun Squad det Marcus Taylor in closing..said gov't went "to depths of criminal underworld " for its witnesses

In closing arguments fed prosecutors used their final witness, 26 y/o BPD Off James Kostoplis, " K-Stop", as the good cop as he said he rejected Wayne Jenkins' plan to steal from drug dealers. Def used him to try to ding Momodu Gondo's credibility. Pic is from his LinkedIn page pic.twitter.com/CvBCmbosCk