How about we have a "no-confidence" vote on Chuck Schumer. Since they spent 6 months investigating this and can't produce any evidence they decide to take this route which is entirely based on opinion. "We don't like the guy" is not good enough for me. How about a "no-confidence" vote on William Jefferson or Jack Murtha or Nancy Pehosi. Now you're talking.

The President talks big on loyalty, but he puts loyalty to his friends like Shady Gonzales ahead of any loyalty he might have to the American people. And if Alberto Gonzales had any guts, he would just man up to what he did and resign. The Pres didn't save Scooter and he won't save AG either.

An unbinding vote of no confidence? That's really stupid. Why bother? It will mean nothing to The Decider, and it will mean even less to Gonzales.

How bout instead, going for a conviction on the War Crimes Act of 1996...which in this case would carry a maximum of the death penalty...I quote...

Sec. 2401. War crimes

(a) OFFENSE- Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

This man, before he became the nations most nefarious Attorney General, was perhaps the main facilitator of Bush Torture-World, and many deaths are known to have resulted from the torture techniques that Gonzales and others codified with their "legal" opinions.

The only question to ask regarding these evil men is, are they beyond the law? Do the president and all of his people get a pass on not only upholding and defending the law, but also on obeying the law? If they do, give them a no confidence vote so they can get on with their "righteous" work of torturing and murdering "bad guys" for the American people. But, if they don't get a legal pass, give them all trials for the crimes they are accused of, and if convictions are achieved, let the penalties be meted out according to the law. I am NOT an advocate for the death penalty, but considering Bush's record of death penalty punishment in Texas (which was consistently supported by Gonzales), I'd make an exception in this case.

God help this country if these evil men are not held to the standard of law. This country will never be whole and right until men like these answer to the law. And only then will the US Constitution again be in effect.

Gonzo's politization of the justice, unamerican torture policies, divisiveness, evasiveness of the truth, etc.. has undermined democracy and good throughout. We must eject this evildoer and his band of theives in the the name of all the good that the United States formerly stood for in hopes of returning our nation back from the direction of Evil and Greed the Bush Administration has a set course on.

I wish he had more to say about China poisoning our food and hygeine products. We sure owe them a lot of money and somehow the Founding Fathers never said we should be so indebted to a communist country. Strangest thing. i'm sure he could find it to be legal.....and just an oversight of the Founders. Owing money to communist countries is one thing, but shouldn't our currency have to be gaining value to keep it legal? Mr. Gonzales, any thoughts?