Why has Cochran never released his Survivor college paper to open critique?

Why has Cochran never released his Survivor college paper to open...

Cochran proudly touted his paper as evidence that he was a "student of the game" in pregame Survivor South Pacific, and then proceeded to make a flip blunder. Probst orally cited Cochran's Survivor paper in a recent tribal council, adding to the mystique of this awesome, never openly published paper. Why has Cochran not released this college paper to his fan base? As I recall, he shied away from his paper post South Pacific as if he wanted to sweep it under the rug.

Is his much touted college paper full of logic holes and naivity? Did Cochran and Probst make a mountain out of a mole hill regarding his paper? Does it reflect instead a lack of understanding of Survivor? If his story one of growth in Survivor, why not release the paper to his fan base for open critique? He could say, "Look, I was a naive Harvard undergrad, but now I am an experienced Survivor who won the game. Probst over hyped the paper and I cited it at the time because my resume was weak. Here is the original, here is the grade I got, and here is what I now think about the paper topics"

I believe Cochran made the flip because he was more about making a name for himself in Survivor lore than winning. Or at least I think he realized he wasn't going to win, so felt he might as well make a big move and be memorable. He was about branding/marketing himself from the very beginning when he requested he be "Cochran", realizing that there has been how many John's over the years.

If you can't win, be memorable. You won't get any air time if you don't make any moves that effect the outcome of the game in some traceable way. If Cochran never made that move, and just voted with his tribe and was booted when his time was up or carried to the F3 and got no votes his edit would have been much different and he never would have played again.