Caught With Our Pants Down in the Gulf

Your bullshit-ometer should be making an awful racket in response to the shifting
explanations given for the twenty-four-hour Iranian hostage scare involving
two US Navy boats intercepted in the Gulf.

First they told us “at least one of the boats” had experienced a “mechanical
failure.” Then they said the boats had run
out of fuel, although it wasn’t clear if they meant both boats. Then they
said “there was no mechanical problem.” Then they claimed that the two
crews had somehow not communicated with the military command, although “they
could not explain how the military had lost contact with not one but both of
the boats.” As the New York Times reported:

“Even as Mr. Kerry was describing the release
on Wednesday morning, American military officials were offering new explanations
about how the two 49-foot patrol boats, formally called riverine command boats,
had ended up in Iranian territorial waters while cruising from Kuwait to Bahrain.”

And they still haven’t explained it – or any of the other distinctly odd circumstances
surrounding this incident.

The best they could do was have an anonymous Navy officer aver “When you’re
navigating in those waters, the space around it gets pretty tight.” However,
as the Times put it:

“But that is hardly a new problem, and the boats’ crews
would almost surely have mapped out their course in advance, paying close attention
to the Iranian boundary waters. And each boat has radio equipment on board,
so it was unclear how the crews suddenly lost communication with their base
unless they were surrounded by Iranian vessels before they could alert their
superiors.”

We are told they were on a “training mission” – but what kind of mission? The
Washington Post adds a helpful detail by telling
us that “The vessels, known as riverine command
boats, are agile and often carry Special Operations forces into smaller bodies
of water.”

Ah, now we’re getting somewhere.

Amid all the faux outrage coming from the neocons
and their enablers in the media over the alleged “humiliation”
of the US – Iran “paraded” the sailors in their media! They made one of the
sailors apologize! The Geneva Conventions were violated! – hardly anyone in
this country is asking the hard questions, first and foremost: what in heck
were those two boats doing in Iranian waters?

And if you believe they somehow “drifted” within
a few miles of Farsi Island, where a highly sensitive Iranian military base
is located, then you probably think there’s a lot of money just waiting for
you in a Nigerian bank account.

Anyone who thinks the adversarial relationship between Washington and Tehran
has turned into “détente” due to the nuclear deal is living in Never-Never Land.
Our close ally, Saudi Arabia, has all but declared war on the Iranians and that
means we are being dragged into the rapidly escalating conflict. In this context,
two US military boats coming a mile and a half away from a major Iranian base
in the Gulf isn’t an accident. This ‘training mission” was a military incursion,
and although we have no way of knowing what mission the US hoped to accomplish,
suffice to say that it wasn’t meant to be a kumbaya moment.

Rachel Maddow is also raising questions about this: after a load of nonsense about how showing the sailors
on Iranian media violated the Geneva Conventions – they didn’t: we aren’t at
war with Iran yet – she pointed out the suspicious nature of the Pentagon’s
shifting story during her January 13 broadcast.

To add another layer to the mystery, the Iranian
government released the sailors after holding them for less than twenty-four
hours – which isn’t the sort of behavior one might expect if those sailors were
on a spy mission. And the Iranians issued an Emily Litella-ish statement,
as
reported by the Los Angeles Times:

“’After explanations the U.S. gave and the
assurances they made, we determined that [the] violation of Iranian territorial
waters was not deliberate, so we guided the boats out of Iranian waters,’ said
Foreign Ministry spokesman Hossein Jaberi Ansari, according to the official
Islamic Republic News Agency.”

So if those two boats were “snooping,”
as the Fars News Agency originally claimed, why would Tehran come out with
this all-is-forgiven statement?

None of it makes any sense, at least not until one realizes that the Iranian
government is hardly
a monolith: power is divided up between various agencies and factions, with
only the loosest sort of unity being enforced by the Supreme Leader. Farsi Island
is controlled by the hard-line Iranian Revolutionary
Guard Corps (IRGC), the hard-line faction of the ruling elite, which wields
enormous political and economic power within the multi-polar Iranian state apparatus.
It was the hard-liners who released the video and photos of the American sailors
with their hands in the air, and their spokesmen demanded an apology from the
US. It was the diplomats, however – the moderates, who negotiated the Iran deal
– whose contacts with the US facilitated the sailors’ quick release.

But it isn’t just the Iranians who are riven with factions and conflicting
lines of authority: the American empire is overseen by a vast national security
bureaucracy involving both military and civilians, and it isn’t monolithic,
either. Although, in theory, civilians are in the drivers’ seat and the military
just follows orders, in reality the Pentagon is an independent power that can
obstruct or even effectively veto whatever diplomatic or military plans the
White House has in mind. And while opposition to the nuke deal was centered
in Congress, the Pentagon
insisted at the last moment that sanctions on conventional arms and particularly
those related to ballistic missiles remain in place. Iran’s recent
testing of medium range ballistic missiles must have the generals in an
uproar, and it could well be that this “training mission” in the Gulf was related
– as either a spying mission, or an outright provocation designed to imperil
relations. Or perhaps both.

We’ll probably never know for sure: but what we certainly can know is that
the official explanation for this latest incident stinks to high heaven. There’s
no denying we were caught by the Iranians with our pants down. The only question
is – how were we trying to f—k them over?

I warned
after the signing of the Iran deal that we are in for a long series of provocations
in the Gulf, and this is only the beginning. In order to keep all this in perspective,
just remember that the long dance between Washington and Tehran involves at
least four partners, including their hard-liners and ours.

NOTES IN THE MARGIN

You can check out my Twitter feed by going here.
But please note that my tweets are sometimes deliberately provocative, often
made in jest, and largely consist of me thinking out loud.

Author: Justin Raimondo

Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of Antiwar.com, and a senior fellow at the Randolph Bourne Institute. He is a contributing editor at The American Conservative, and writes a monthly column for Chronicles. He is the author of Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement [Center for Libertarian Studies, 1993; Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2000], and An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard [Prometheus Books, 2000].
View all posts by Justin Raimondo