I felt you were looking for something to point out as scummy; but then the two things you pointed out contradicted each other.

not that scum hunting is wrong, but I find the two things you pointed out; Burbank aligned and voting for someone who hasn't posted yet, very minuscule; but amplified by you.

But they didn't contradict each other. They're different issues, how are they contradictory? You wouldn't say to someone who wanted someone to serve more time for rape and another person less time for a minor crime that they're contradicting themselves? They're talking about 2 different issues. How are they [the 2 things I talked about] even remotely being close to similar? It wasn't Ziggler's lack of specifity I had a problem with originally, anyway. it was the weirdness of the vote - then his lack of answering a question no matter how dumb you think it is.

And yes, of course I amplified them? Why would I not make things seem more serious than they are in an effort to start the serious phase of the game?

Well I don't think I particularly don't agree with Skyfall reasons specially the one which voted you I treat it as him getting confused

You ask ziggler why did vote for fitz before even fitz posted what did you expect him to say its quite obvious its random vote or maybe he irritated him some time in previous , and maybe you asked get reaction from him and for same you voted Mclovin but zigglers reaction was perfectly fine what did expect him react when asked for a reason he probably that it was obvious it was random vote

But then when more votes from nov , kenny started you started get defensive calling their play stupid and undermine their play

Exactly.

Concerning the gif: Yes I am posting it every post, no it's not a PR. Street Fighter has nothing to do with Chuck.

CLICK THE SIG TO ENTER THE SUMMERSLAM POSTER COMPETITION

2014 Winner of Best Signature & 2014 GFX Poster of the Year2013 Winner of Best Signature &2013 GFX Poster of the Year2012 Winner of Seabs' Heart&2012 GFX Poster of the Year

And yes, of course I amplified them? Why would I not make things seem more serious than they are in an effort to start the serious phase of the game?

because they were minuscule things. a random vote, a mention of alignment? I find you made yourself look [artificially] like you're scum hunting and giving possible insights.

Perhaps they aren't contradictory. You still used those 2 instances to draw peoples attention to something commonly done; and like I said, you amplified their meaning. I find that to be a scummy trait.