I’ve had this conversation about language and identity time and again with Africans I meet on my travels. My Afropolitan (read: world citizen) accent throws them off – a mix of American, Nigerian, and what’s often mistaken for British diction, simply because I enunciate my Ts. (Perhaps it’s the remnants of attending a British-run primary school; not likely though.)

Bread-breaking usually comes to a halt until the matter of my accent (origin) is cleared up. They simply must know which language I speak so that they can place me in one of two boxes: one of us, or one of them.

When I tell the cultural gatekeepers that I’m from Nigeria, and my accent is the result of living in the states for the past 12 years, they’re still not satisfied.

“Are you sure you weren’t just born there?” they ask, “You don’t sound like you grew up in Nigeria.” I usually respond by asking them what a Nigerian who grew up in Nigeria sounds like, then hear some variation of “Like the people in Nollywood movies.”

And when I tell them, I’m sorry to disappoint, I’m not an actress but an activist, I’m Nigerian through and through – I just went to the states for university, they deliver the kicker, “Well, prove it. What language do you speak?” The minute I respond with English (“Oh…”), it’s all downhill from there.

Yet, ironically, immigrant parents in the US are less likely to teach their children their native languages, for the purpose – or rather, the sake – of easing their assimilation into English-speaking culture.

The latter scenario resonates deeply with me. I grew up with a father who wasn’t fluent in his mother tongue, Agbor (a region-specific dialect of Ika), because his father had outlawed the language being spoken in the house.

Hence, my mother’s desire to see me succeed meant equipping me with tools to ensure I could thrive outside of the country I called my home.

For instance, I would attend an international British-run private school, where white teachers would single out the only other black kid in the class for not pronouncing “stomach” correctly (“stuh-muck”, not “stoh-mack” apparently); only an American or British university would do; I would not learn my native tongue until I spoke English “perfectly” and no longer risked picking up a “bad, Nigerian accent” that would make it harder for me “over there.”

You see, both my parents studied in Los Angeles in the 70s; on top of the (incomprehensible to me) racism of the time, they also faced American imperialist views and discrimination against “foreigners.”

My mother was repeatedly rejected by employers for speaking too “harshly”, eventually forcing her to give up pursuing her dream career in television. It’s no wonder that every morning in my early childhood, my parents would wake up at 5 am to tape Satellite episodes of Sesame Street …They believed (or hoped) that watching British and American English programming would teach their children to speak “properly,” so they wouldn’t have to give up on their dreams.

For a long time, I resented my parents for robbing me of learning both my native languages. Later, I resented Nigeria for being so poorly-run that my parents couldn’t see me thriving anywhere but outside of it.

Now, as I think about the players who created the environment I was raised to escape – who concocted a system so cruel it culturally orphans children for its own purposes, it’s become much harder to keep directing anger at my own family, and my own people.

My parents shouldn’t be crucified for acting in full awareness of the unjust systems that police indigenous cultures: the colonialist rubble left behind in Nigeria by the British Empire, and the resentment of Britain’s imperialist younger brother, the US of A, towards foreigners.

Their fears were rational; my Puerto Rican partner, who manages a Spanish-speaking client support team at work, comes home at least once a week to vent about some caller’s rude reaction to a supervisee’s accent, dismissing them as un-educated, or ill-equipped to perform their jobs because they perceivably don’t speak “proper English.”

Still, while many immigrants are forced to sacrifice native language fluency, it’s important to note that similar negotiations around language, identity, and yes, accents, don’t just play out within the context of the migrant Diaspora. Many Africans living on the continent don’t speak their native languages, either. And, their reasons aren’t so different from their estranged brethren.

In Nigeria, for instance, as a Delta-Igbo person living in a state dominated by Yorubas, I experienced much discrimination at school: regular tribalist diatribes from Social Studies teachers, punctuated by stereotypical Igbo impersonations from classmates.

The ethnic tensions that permeated my school dated back to when Igbo people had attempted to gain independence from the political mess the British left in Nigeria post-independence.

These attempts, the result of colonial powers leaving certain ethnic groups in power over others, led to the Biafran war and genocide.

The war had a lasting legacy: many Igbo students at my school didn’t speak their language (openly) for fear of being socially ostracized. Speaking, or at least understanding even broken Yoruba was a way of appearing more socially acceptable, to assimilate and survive.

Policing Africanness: Language, Globalization, and Cultural Access

As is the case with many other colonized African countries, in South Africa, for example, the 12 official languages are the result of white men sitting down at a table, drawing squiggly lines around the region they wished to claim.

They didn’t care about the diversity of peoples living there: not when they declared Afrikaans the official language of schools during apartheid, and not now when discussing the “under-achievement” of black youth while ignoring the impact apartheid’s indifference to Africa’s diverse cultures and languages has had on the struggle to reform education.

By the way: Afrikaans is not an indigenous African language, its origins date back to Europe settlers who spoke Dutch. Yet, there are South Africans (coloureds and blacks) who only speak Afrikaans or English due to similar circumstance e.g. migration, globalization, interracial adoption, etc.

Are they less African than the South Africans who speak Xhosa? Or Zulu? What about white people who migrate to Africa and learn to speak local languages? Are they now more “African” than Africans who do not, yet have been living there since birth?

During a recent trip I was told by a white American woman in Botswana that the locals would be more accepting of her than they would of me; like many white people in Africa, she’d been living there for a year and supposedly understood the local language. I didn’t, therefore it didn’t matter that I was Nigerian, or even black.

She smugly insisted that she’d be perceived as more African than me, a ludicrous perception in my view, but one hinged on the same idea that keeps other Africans second-guessing my Africanness: language as the ultimate litmus test for claiming any “real” connection to our home countries.

Chill Out: Language is Just One Aspect of Culture

My purpose isn’t to debate who is more African than whom based on language. On the contrary: I don’t understand how anyone can cherry pick a single aspect of our culture as the arbiter of “authentic” African identity: Language.

For sure, it’s important. But so is indigenous spirituality, traditional garb, family values, the arts.

I am also not using colonialism as an excuse to lessen the importance of learning our native tongues; language offers us a very obvious, easily detectable signal that someone is either part of our community, or not. You know this if you’ve ever walked into a Dominican bodega and had to ask for something in English, then watched as the eyes computed, instantly: “not one of us.”

Furthermore, in many African cultures, the parts of our history that haven’t yet been erased or revised are passed down to younger generations, orally.

Perhaps that’s why we stubbornly stick to fluency in “the mother tongue” as the yardstick for “Africanness,” “our-ness,” “us-ness.”

Perhaps the tune about real Africans being able to speak their mother tongues is only sung in protest against the hegemony of our colonizers’ languages.

But is spiting them reason enough to spite each other? By perpetuating the use of a single cultural marker to create a hierarchy of Africanness, aren’t we simply deploying the same tools colonizers used to divide and conquer? Aren’t we essentially continuing the work the British Empire started?

We can do better.

There are a myriad of other identity markers that reveal the extent of both our sameness and uniqueness and make up the diverse African cultures that span the globe.

Africa is complex – Africans, even more so. Let’s not trade in our shared heritage for the exclusivity of an unjust social hierarchy. Let’s not, as our colonizers did, draw borders around poorly constructed monoliths.

Our just protest for an Africa with linguistic agency must not turn us into the same masters of imperialist dogma we’re still yet to hold accountable.

Spectra is a Nigerian writer, activist, and social commentator. She writes about gender, culture, identity, and digital storytelling as relevant to the African diaspora at www.spectraspeaks.com. Follow her on Twitter @spectraspeaks

2 comments

“Language is just one aspect of culture…” I don’t agree with that statement and I don’t think it’s a fair statement to make either. You did rightly acknowledge the importance of language, and that’s good,but we could forgive anybody who thinks language is the sum of most cultural expressions. What you speak says a lot about who you are, what you are, your history/background. Although English is the official language of most African countries, it’s a disgrace for anyone who calls themselves African to not understand or speak any African language. Such African is a victim of colonialism, even if not their fault.