We didn’t. Our only attendants were our sisters — one on each side. His sister carried one ring, and my dad carried the other and gave it to my sister to hand the officiant (my sister couldn’t be trusted not to lose it! :)).

We didn’t. In my opinion, you don’t need them at all, and only do this if you have very close children (like nieces or nephews) who you really want to include. Our oldest niece/nephew was 2 and we decided she was too young.

The best man kept the rings in his jacket pocket. In fact I’ve always thought that was the traditional thing to do anyway.

We’re seriously considering having a ring bearer but no flower girl. My FI’s cousin (who travels in for all big family holidays, so is really very close to his nuclear family) has a son who will be around 3 at the time of the wedding and would be a super precious addition. I’d also like to legitimize her family’s inclusion in the wedding and acknowledge how important they are to us. However, we just not as close to any little girls and I don’t want to include someone just so we have a set.

We wouldn’t be having any if my FMIl didn’t want them. I don’t know any children on my side to use for it but Fiance has a ton of small cousins. It would be so much simpler without worrying about wrangling children that day!

We didn’t and it was fine 🙂 Our wedding was child free and we didn’t know any kids we were close enough to that warranted being in the wedding party. I did have my dog in the wedding as the “flower dog” with a dog collar with flowers on it

Were not having a flower girl or ring bearer. We decided on a child free wedding and just felt like it wasn’t necessary, plus we don’t have any young children were close with. No friends or close family members have little ones yet.

We had two FGs that were literally the only children at the wedding. They were more for the cuteness value than anything else since we didn’t have them toss anything. We didn’t have a Ring Bearer and we just gave our officiant the rings prior. It worked out fine.