Mike Flynn Reprieve

I'm confused. I thought Trump was all about law and order and draining the swamp. Why would it be a good thing for a guy like Flynn, who has admitted
to breaking the law, to not only get off on a technicality but to also potentially receive a cash pay out as well?

At least with this FISA issue they actually have evidence to run with. Let's see if they are talking about the President's weight in a few
weeks...LOL.

And yes, there has been investigation into Trump for 18 months...when you include the intelligence agencies and FBI under Obama investigating and
eavesdropping. Heck...the fake Dossier was started by the Republicans during the primaries but took an illegal turn once it got into Hillary's and
the Democrats hands. So don't tell me Trump hasn't been under investigation for 18 months...he has, just some of it was illegal.

Because it was illegal how it was obtained. That is what makes our country so do different from dictatorships, basic rights. Well it did make us
different....until about 9 years ago when we became a banana republic.

Because it was illegal how it was obtained. That is what makes our country so do different from dictatorships, basic rights. Well it did make us
different....until about 9 years ago when we became a banana republic.

How do you know it was illegal? Has there been an indictment, trial? It's just your opinion and you know what they say about opinions.

I think they should be held to the letter of the law and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Them and their fearful leader. Can't happen fast
enough for me.
I wonder what trump is worth in rubles don't you?

good point.

i hear so many saying mueller has been investigating for SO LONG and they have nothing.

Because it was illegal how it was obtained. That is what makes our country so do different from dictatorships, basic rights. Well it did make us
different....until about 9 years ago when we became a banana republic.

How do you know it was illegal? Has there been an indictment, trial? It's just your opinion and you know what they say about opinions.

That said, I am not a legal expert.

A separate trial is not required for a judge to determine that a particular piece of evidence was illegally obtained.
Surely you are familiar with cases that have been thrown out because a suspect was not read his Miranda rights and subsequently said something that
was used against them? In those cases, the cop is not arrested for not reading the Miranda rights to a suspect.... in fact, no law was broken.
But the tainted evidence does not count.

This will be the first time Hillary will be investigated when she wields absolutely zero power. LOL...most of her friends aren't in power right now
either. And the ones that are still left? They are in more doo doo than she is. Oh how the mighty have fallen...and we haven't even gotten to
Uranium One yet.

Oh but they will. The Dems are now trying to bury this story with a government shutdown.

But it's not the fact that the last administration did this that surprises me. Obama was a dictator from the get go. Obama using the intelligence
agencies most potent weapons to spy on a political opposition campaign is none surprising. What is surprising is the number of American's that
support it and want this story buried. It is scary how many Marxist's make up the American population these days. The Democratic party is full of
them now. My word...the government spying on private U.S. citizens and political opponents was something 99.9% of American's would have never
supported prior to Obama. Now it is not only shrugged off...but many secretly are actually supporting it by wanting this story buried.

If this goes unchecked than you now have Trump with the same powerful tools Obama had to do exactly what the Obama administration did. So if you are
a democrat right now, I would be really careful what you wish for.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
I'm confused. I thought Trump was all about law and order and draining the swamp. Why would it be a good thing for a guy like Flynn, who has admitted
to breaking the law, to not only get off on a technicality but to also potentially receive a cash pay out as well?

Its totally lawful to exonerate someone due to illegally obtained evidence even if they did commit a crime. Thats how evidence works when you use if
from the posionious tree.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.