The Israelization of America

by James Brooks

Dissident Voice

December 5, 2002

US officials
recently announced the somewhat jarring news that Israeli security forces will
be training American soldiers in the techniques of urban warfare. Apparently
Israel's illegal thirty-five year occupation of Palestine has enabled it to
perfect tactics that our troops will need in a 'possible' war on Iraq.

Most informed
Americans will receive this news with a sense of both foreboding and
dislocation. The brutal tactics of the Israeli 'Defense' Forces have been
denounced for decades by human rights groups, the United Nations, and scores of
foreign governments. Is this how we want our own troops to fight? Our sense of dislocation
(even 'topsy-turvy') in greeting this news traces to something else: the fact
that Israel has always been our client, not the other way around. Why are the
Israelis now teaching us?

Is this really
something new, or is it merely an unusually explicit lesson in the continuing
education of American power by the Israeli vanguard? Who has been learning from
whom in this "special relationship"?

From Covert Crimes to Points of Pride

Over the past
half century, Israel's organized terror against Palestinian civilians has moved
from the relatively secret operations of special Israeli army and paramilitary
units to globally televised depredations wrought with helicopter gunships,
state-of-the-art tanks, and F-16 fighters. In the process, massacres like those
perpetrated in the old days by Israeli army units at Deir Yassin and Qibya have
been dwarfed, in terms of casualties, scope, and property damage, by today's
daily and indiscriminate destruction in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.
Crimes that Israel once felt compelled to hide from the world are now on full
display, vigorously defended by the Israeli government.

Fifty years ago,
America also felt the need to conduct most of its international crimes far from
public view. Interventions in the affairs of uncooperative nations (invariably
conducted to "fight communism") were mostly secretive, CIA-led
actions that made surreptitious use of special military units, typically called
"American advisors" (Honduras, Guatemala, Iran, and Cuba provide a
few relevant examples).

Now, emboldened
by the demise of its only global counterweight, the Soviet Union, and
encouraged by Israel's success in using conventional military forces in a
public and illegal campaign against civilians, the US is increasingly eschewing
the old "secret war" model in favor of direct and open military
intervention with American troops. Witness Somalia, Haiti, Yugoslavia, and
Afghanistan during the past ten years.

Pre-emptive Action

Israel has long
been criticized for taking pre-emptive military action against its perceived
enemies. Two well-known examples are its surprise attack against a
nearly-completed Iraqi nuclear power plant and its protracted, illegal and
bloody occupation of southern Lebanon. Despite worldwide criticism of these and
many other blatant violations of international law, Israel continued, and
continues, undaunted.

The Clinton
administration was noted for its fawning support of Israel's occupation, and
for abandoning a long-standing US commitment (on paper only, of course) to
return Palestine to its pre-1967 borders. Clinton also took a big page out
Israel's book on international relations, when he insisted, against strenuous
objections from the United Nations, that the US has the right to launch
pre-emptive strikes, and that NATO had the right to wage war on Yugoslavia
without UN approval. This year, the Bush administration dropped all pretense of
maintaining security with deterrence and adopted the illegal Israeli standard
of pre-emptive strikes as official US policy.

Militarization of Politics

Our politicians
have also learned much by example from our close and "special"
relationship with the government of Israel. For decades, our pols have used
cant, dissimulation and fraud to excuse Israel's most egregious crimes. In the
process, much has been learned about how to turn acts of wanton destruction
into a noble defense of freedom. Israel's willingness to keep 'pushing the
envelope' of state terror has been invaluable in this process, training both
American pols and media in the arts of propaganda required to justify
ever-larger crimes.

Meanwhile, the
American populace has been steadily learning to accept Israel's gross
violations of human rights, international law, and common decency as 'necessary
for peace and security', justified by 'Israel's right to defend herself'. This
lesson in moral decay and desensitization is proving handy indeed, as the
current US administration seeks to extend American hegemony in the Middle East
by a new war of occupation.

The Terror Card

Following the
tragedy of 9/11, Israel immediately recast its thirty-five-year occupation of
Palestine as an essential front in the "war on terror". To extract
maximum political advantage from our loss and grief, Israeli politicians like
Ariel Sharon suggested, with typical touches of arrogance and
self-satisfaction, that, finally, Americans know how Israelis have felt for
years. We face a common and implacable enemy, they lectured us, leaving
unspoken the message that we Americans had better develop some backbone and put
our shoulder to the anti-terror wheel.

Of course, our
politicians did not really require Israel's instruction to convert our tragedy
into their political windfall. However, they quickly employed several
rhetorical devices that, before 9/11, were most often found in Israel's
political toolbox (domestic and foreign). Suddenly, all kinds of international
and domestic issues were redefined as being part of the "war on
terror", requiring new and drastic solutions that were, of course,
necessary for "security", and often highly profitable for favored
corporate interests.

No doubt our
leaders saw major advantages to this radical simplification of world affairs.
First, they could dispense with even the pretense of negotiation, because
"you cannot negotiate with terrorists". They could neatly sidestep,
or simply dispose of, human rights limitations imposed by law and the
Constitution, because "terrorists have no respect for the rule of
law". The "terror card" also enabled them to bulldoze public
opposition to new and highly intrusive government surveillance, and so on.

Remote Funding

Just as Israel
depends on billions of dollars annually from a compliant US government to
maintain its military occupation and indifference to UN resolutions and
international law, America's power axis also thrives on a steady flow of wealth
from a similarly remote and supine source -- the American people. And just as
Israel makes it a point to occasionally disobey the orders of its US sponsors,
so American politicians at the pinnacle of power pointedly disregard the many
voices of the people that call for justice and peace. During consideration of
the recent Congressional resolution supporting war on Iraq, Democracy Now reported that
citizen messages to Congressional offices of both chambers and both sides of
the aisle were running 10 to 1 against the resolution. Naturally, both the
House and Senate passed the measure by overwhelming margins. The reply to the
American public was clear; "We watch our push-polls. Pay your taxes and
shut up."

Injustice at Home

Even within its
own pre-1967 borders, Israel's human rights record is abysmal. Twenty percent
of Israel's population is now comprised of non-Jewish Arabs who, by law, are
systematically rendered second-class citizens in their own homeland. Special
hells in Israel's complex legal and social caste system are reserved for
Bedouins and African Jews. Israel's stubborn insistence on the primacy of the "Jewish
state" and its institutionalized discrimination against non-Jews have set
poor examples for America, where Israel is routinely hailed as a shining
example of "Western democracy". We cannot quantify the debasing
effects of this mass fantasy, but we can see that while America's own system of
minority repression becomes increasingly severe, the public is told that pride
in America's "liberty and equality for all" is at an all-time high.

Something like
Israel's state-heavy and racist system of state capitalism could plausibly be
the goal of a nation that resegregates its cities and public schools, enforces
draconian drug laws sentencing statutes, dramatically increases its prison
population, systematically profiles people of color at all levels of law enforcement,
institutes military tribunals and denies due process to those it declares
'enemies of the state', and corrupts its legal system so thoroughly that the
poor and colored have little hope of obtaining justice. Meanwhile, both
countries continue to set new records in the gap between rich and poor, and in
both nations the proportion of the poor and lower middle class has been
steadily growing for over twenty years. An Israeli might argue, however, that
in the classroom of social inequality, Israel is the student and America the
teacher. A committee of the Israeli Knesset has just reported that Israel is now "rated second in the Western world . . .
in terms of social gaps in income, property, capital, education and spending,
as well as in the extent of poverty". The United
States was number one. (1)

Occupation

Israel's long war of attrition against
the Palestinians has proven to America's power elite that it is possible to
indefinitely occupy the land of another people, even in the face of nearly
global opposition -- if you're backed by enough raw power. The West Bank and
the Gaza Strip constitute a kind of open-air laboratory and lecture hall, in
which Israel demonstrates the advantages of occupation to its dutiful American
pupil. These advantages include a dirt-cheap labor pool that can be turned on
and off at will, the ability to emasculate and/or decapitate any effort at self-rule
within the occupied lands, the utility of occupation as an object lesson and
divisive thorn-in-the-side of neighboring enemies, and so on. Israel has also
demonstrated the usefulness of sustained occupation for increasing a nation's
overall military might. The constant war-footing, and the need for violent
repression of a restive and disenfranchised people, create never-ending
opportunities for the purchase and use of the latest military equipment, and
for the containment of domestic politics.

One Lesson Not Learned?

While American
power has in general been a very attentive student of Israeli policy and
practice, there is one crucial lesson at the back of Israel's textbook that
remains unlearned: Israel's approach will never create peace or achieve a just
solution. Of course, that suits its purposes. The point of Israeli strategy is
to grind the Palestinians into dust until they just blow away, and the last
shreds of Palestine can be swept up into Eretz (Greater) Israel, always the
goal of the military Zionists and their Laborite alter egos.

Unless forced to do otherwise, Israel, driven by a tragic and
fundamentally racist ideology, will fight on for a hundred years to dispose of
the "Palestinian problem". But American attempts to apply the localized
Israeli model (designed to acquire land the size of Rhode Island) to a
"global war on terror" are rewriting the definition of
"over-reach". By following Israel's lead (which is constitutionally
averse to just solutions) in the "war on terror", we ensure that the
war will never be won and will never end. Increasingly, we suspect that our
leaders may understand this lesson, too. And they're getting ready to send
another 14 billion dollars in shiny red apples (disguised as new loan
guarantees and military aid) to their beloved teachers in Jerusalem.

James Brooksof
Worcester, Vermont is former marketing director of Vita-Flex Nutrition and was
founding vice-president of the National Association of Equine Supplement
Manufacturers. Past articles have been published on the NileMedia Web
site (www.nilemedia.com).
Currently Mr. Brooks serves as webmaster for Vermonters for a Just Peace in
Palestine/Israel (www.vtjp.org) and
publishes News Links, a daily e-mail digest of Middle East news and commentary.
Brooks is also a member of the national Al-Awda Co-ordinating Committee.
Contact at 802-223-0877, jamiedb@attglobal.net.

________________________________________

(1)Israel No. 2 in
West in social inequality, Ha'aretz English Online Edition, December 3, 2002