I have been reading this website and am confused about the definition of a liberal. Quite frankly, I consider myself a liberal because I prefer that the government not be involved in a citizens life any more than necessary. Necessary to me means to provide protection from crime and protection from invasion by a foreign force. I am against gun control, excessive taxes and ridiculous laws-smoking laws, seatbelt laws etc. That said, I always wear a seatbelt and smoke only in my personal space-at home and in my car. My problem is that I don't really care what anyone else does and this is why I think you consider me a liberal. I don't care if my neighbor is gay or if a co-worker is engaged in an inter-racial marriage. I think drugs should be legal because I don't care if someone wants to kill themselves with excess. It isn't my business what anyone else does so long as their behavior does not hurt or infringe on anyone else's rights. I am sincere when I ask why this sort of thinking is seen as threatening-I must be missing something....

Definitely confused about the "liberal" moniker--liberals yearn for government intervention into every aspect of ones "conservative" life yet promote "free-thinking" in matters such as drugs and "marriage". They tend to legitimize deviance under the guise of "rights"--this is why I view that sort as corrosive to society. Are you still a "liberal"? Hope that helps with your confusion.

Liberals use to be people who believed in liberty, now they are anything but that. Just like main-stream conservatives aren't really conservative, and we call them Neocons. Some people who are traditionally conservative try to make the distinction between the two just like people who are now libertarian would have been liberals at an earlier time.

It's a shame the jews have twisted words so much that bad means good, and gay no longer means happy. To me these days, I don't make the distinction between liberal and conservative, I just call myself a White Nationalist.