Addressing threats to health care's core values, especially those stemming from concentration and abuse of power. Advocating for accountability, integrity, transparency, honesty and ethics in leadership and governance of health care.

Thursday, January 30, 2014

A US News and World Report article affirms what we have previously written, that those charged with the stewardship of US hospitals are even more inclined now to hire top managers with little or no health care experience or credentials.

Putting Finance Managers in Charge

They particularly seem to favor executives drawn from the world of finance.

Just to make it really clear, the exposition started with the article title,

Wanted: Hospital CEOs Without Health Care Experience

The article drew on some of the figures about executive hiring which we discussed in December, 2013,

It’s expected that two-thirds of hospital CEOs hired this year will have
little to no health care experience, according to Black Book Rankings,
which last year conducted a poll of 1,404 human resource officers and
board members of health care organizations

However, the new article profiled some examples,

.When Carlos Migoya was hired in May 2011 to run Jackson Health System,
Miami-Dade County’s safety net hospital system, he had no health care
experience. A career banker, Migoya took over.....

Also,

Mike Keating, CEO of Christ Hospital in Cincinnati, previously was an
investment banker.;Robert Meyer, president and CEO of Phoenix Children's
Hospital, came from the consulting world;...

The article stressed that hospital boards think a background in finance is particularly valuable.

Hospital board and HR directors are looking for non-industry
productivity, business development and financial management experts with
heavy technological expertise.

Also,

[executive vice president and managing principle at Cejka Executive Search. Paul] Esselman notes that boards increasingly 'are looking at leaders from managed care, the payer side or from finance or banking.'

Why Hospital Boards Favor Finance Executives

banking, like health care, is heavily regulated and that two decades ago
banking went through significant consolidation, which hospitals today
face.

So,

[ managing partner of Black Book Rankings Doug] Brown says leaders that come from productivity-focused fields and
sectors that have endured consolidation are particularly suited for
running hospitals today. Those in financial services may prove useful in
today’s climate, as 'there are a lot of troubled hospitals,' he says.

As we noted before, the article suggested that those who hire hospital executives think their most important challenges s included -

'Communication is now more important than ever,; says Paul Esselman

the opportunities come in delivering its service or business lines to ever-expanding distribution channels.

says [former investment banker Mike] Keating. 'The key in health care is how you go about executing and executing well.'

[former banker Carlos] Migoya put in place operational reforms, including bringing in 'a lot of people with
for-profit experience' to maintain expense controls, monitor operations,
collect payments more quickly and pay its own bills sooner to gain
prompt-payment discounts. Then, 'we realigned procurement,' he says,
adding 'we motivate our procurement department with incentives,' which 'dramatically improved' Jackson Health’s process, time and costs.
Meanwhile, the system outsourced pharmaceutical management, saving $15
million a year....

Note that these examples are all about management process and financial outcomes, NOT about clinical processes, quality of care, or patient outcomes. (The only mention of anything close to clinical management was a plan to outsource same.)

Left unsaid is that the boards charged with the stewardship of hospitals are now mainly composed of business executives, often heavily weighted with those in finance.

Summary - What Could Go Wrong?

Of course, former bankers, and others from the world of finance may not really know much about clinical work, quality of care, or patient outcomes. They may not have been picked because they care about such issues, nor socialized with the "patient first" mantra which health professionals are supposed to support.

Worse, it seems that those who choose hospital executives may not be thinking about the recent history of finance. True, it shares with health care the presence of regulation and increasing consolidation. However, as we all started to realize in 2008, the leaders of finance helped bring on the worst financial crisis since the great depression. More than five years since the beginning of this new great recession, US median income is dropping adjusted for inflation, while income inequality has tremendously increased. Finance executives have been prime proponents of financialization, the theory that increasing shareholder value, which really seems to translate into increasing organizational short term income and increasing executive compensation are more important than any other outcomes. Thus seems to correspond to the discussion above about financial and management objectives sans any notion of what is good for patients.

Even more disturbing is all the anecdotal evidence that business management, particularly in finance, has been gripped by overarching greed. Pope Francis called it the "idolatry of money." (look here).

In his graphic memoir of his days as a successful Wall Street trader, Sam Polk called it wealth addiction, .

I noticed the vitriol that traders directed at the government for
limiting bonuses after the crash. I heard the fury in their voices at
the mention of higher taxes. These traders despised anything or anyone
that threatened their bonuses. Ever see what a drug addict is like when
he’s used up his junk? He’ll do anything — walk 20 miles in the snow,
rob a grandma — to get a fix. Wall Street was like that. In the months
before bonuses were handed out, the trading floor started to feel like a
neighborhood in 'The Wire' when the heroin runs out.

He was not the first to describe wealth addiction:

Wealth addiction was described by the late sociologist and playwright
Philip Slater in a 1980 book, but addiction researchers have paid the
concept little attention. Like alcoholics driving drunk, wealth
addiction imperils everyone. Wealth addicts are, more than anybody,
specifically responsible for the ever widening rift that is tearing
apart our once great country. Wealth addicts are responsible for the
vast and toxic disparity between the rich and the poor and the
annihilation of the middle class. Only a wealth addict would feel
justified in receiving $14 million in compensation — including an $8.5
million bonus — as the McDonald’s C.E.O., Don Thompson, did in 2012,
while his company then published a brochure for its work force on how to
survive on their low wages. Only a wealth addict would earn hundreds of
millions as a hedge-fund manager, and then lobby to maintain a tax
loophole that gave him a lower tax rate than his secretary.

Physicians swear oaths to put patient care ahead of all else. While we may be far from perfect in our adherence to these oaths, I would like to think that when health care organizations were lead by health professionals, many tried to put patient care first Yet professional managers, not health care professionals now lead health care.

.In 1988, Alain Enthoven advocated in Theory and Practice of Managed Competition in Health Care Finance,
a book published in the Netherlands, that to decrease health care costs
it would be necessary to break up the "physicians' guild" and replace
leadership by clinicians with leadership by managers (see 2006 post here).
Thus from 1983 to 2000, the number of managers working in the US health
care system grew 726%, while the number of physicians grew 39%, so the
manager/physician ratio went from roughly one to six to one to one (see
2005 post here). As we noted here, the growth continued, so there are now 10 managers for every US physician.

The managers who first took over health care may have had some health care background. Now it seems that health care managers are decreasingly likely to have any health care background, and increasingly likely to be from the world of finance. Can anyone seriously believe that finance managers taught to put short-term revenue first, and who may often be wealth addicts who practice the idolatry of money in charge of health care is going to improve anything other than those same managers' wealth?

As I have said before, true health care reform would put in place leadership
that understands the health care context, upholds health care
professionals' values, and puts patients' and the public's health ahead
of extraneous, particularly short-term financial concerns. We need
health care governance that holds health care leaders accountable, and
ensures their transparency, integrity and honesty.

But this sort of reform would challenge the interests of managers who are getting very rich off the current system. So I am
afraid the US may end up going far down this final common pathway before
enough people manifest enough strength to make real changes.

1 comment:

I agree. When these executives start seeing the "person" in their "personnel" as well as the "person" in "personal care," then employees and patients alike should start to see that the executive actual "care" about their customers' "health" in the "healthcare" industry.

Our Tenth Anniversary

The tenth anniversary of Health Care Renewal was December 10, 2014. During our anniversary year, please help Health Care Renewal continue to challenge concentration and abuse of power in health care. Donate to FIRM, the Foundation for Integrity and Responsibility in Medicine, a US 501(c)3 non-profit. All contributions are US tax deductible as provided by US law. Our address is 16 Cutler St, Suite 104, Warren, RI, 02885. Email info at firmfound dot org for questions or comments.

FIRM welcomes support from individuals and non-profit organizations. If you are interested in donating to FIRM, please email info at firmfound dot org, snail mail us at 16 Cutler St, Suite 104, Warren, RI, 02885, USA, or see our web-site

Note that FIRM is a 501(c)3 that researches problems with leadership and governance in health care that threaten core values, and disseminates our findings to physicians, health care researchers and policy-makers, and the public at large. FIRM advocates representative, transparent, accountable and ethical health care governance, and hopes to empower health care professionals and patients to promote better health care leadership.

Health Wonk Review

Policies: Blog Roll and Comments

Our blogroll is meant to include blogs that provide interesting content relevant to what we write. It is not an endorsement in any way of any specific blog.

We accept comments, especially from registered Blogger users. If you do not wish to register with Blogger, we will accept anonymous comments, although prefer that they contain identification of the commenter.

We encourage thoughtful comments relevant to the issues brought up by the posts on Health Care Renewal.

All comments are moderated. We will reject spam, profanity, advertising of products or services not directly related to the content of this blog.

We will reject any unsubstantiated accusations or allegations.

Nonetheless, all comments represent only the opinions of those making them. The appearance of comments does not imply endorsement by the Health Care Renewal bloggers.

Please email general comments about the blog, other concerns, or questions to info AT firmfound DOT org