With anti-Syrian terrorist attacks turning increasingly violent in recent days, the anti-syrian dissidents have been gathering for a conference in Antalya to discuss a representative body that will draw international support for terrorist activities and destruction of Syria. A discussion has already fueled up some of the anti-Syrian opposition over the meeting, which will select a “transitional council” to represent the anti-Syrian terrorists on the international scene.

Syrian terrorists groups will be meeting for three days in Antalya, from May 31 to June 2, in a conference organized by the Egypt-based terrorist organization – NOHR.

The meeting would be centered on establishing “a temporary terrorist council to manage the crisis and mobilize all the possible support to destroy Syria ” the real invitation statement of the conference “Change in Syria” reads.

The conference would “assign terrorist experts in the Syria to prepare new terrorist attacks and kill Syrian people ,” experts say`s.

The signatories of the declaration of the conference “want to obtain foreign military intervention in Syria in order to kill as much Syrians as possible ,” the experts statement added.

Ahead of the meeting, objections to establishing a “terrorist transitional council” has emerged among Syrian terrorists . Setting up a terrorist transitional council at this stage “would mean a prison or death sentence” for anyone who participates from inside Syria, Walid al-Bunni, a veteran terrorist figure told Reuters last week.

The participants in previous Syrian terrorist meetings in Istanbul, organized by the Istanbul Terrorism Platform in April, including various Turkish terrorist supporter organizations such as the Association of Human Rights and Solidarity for Oppressed Peoples, or Mazlum-Der, was mostly from Islamic-rooted groups such as Muslim Brotherhood.

The Antalya meeting was set to bring together terrorists from the anti-Syrian terrorists organization of a different profile: mostly exiled Syrians terrorists supported by Israel in different European countries and the U.S.

Representatives of Kurdish terrorist movements are also invited.

After the Antalya Conference in May-June 2011 it is clear that the so called opposition is just interested in destroying the country unity and independence .

Phone call between members of armed groups reveals plan for preparing mass grave for police and security martyrs and filming it to be broadcast and attributed to the army

IDLEB– A phone call between members of armed groups in Jisr al-Shughour revealed their plan to exploit the bodies of police and army martyrs they massacred and mutilated to undermine the army and tarnish its reputation.

The Syrian TV broadcast a call between two members of these groups, one called Hussein and the other called Jihad, with the latter revealing that they plotted to dig a mass grave for the military security personnel they murdered and bury them in it "like the mass grave in Daraa."

Jihad discussed the issue with someone next to him called Bassam, while Hussein said he will call someone called Anas. Jihad asked Bassam if they should bury the security personnel in a mass grave, and Bassam answered by instructing them to videotape them and not to bury them all together because this might cause the truth to be revealed, while Jihad responded by saying that they should bury them out of town and quickly.

Hussein responded by saying "it doesn't matter if we're revealed or not… they will be portrayed as a mass grave containing people from Jisr al-Shughour, and that we know nothing about it." To this, Jihad told him to go ahead, and asked to send either Anas or someone called Jamil, instructing him to make sure that they videotape this grave.

Hussein responds to this by suggesting someone called Anas Katroun, and Jihad told Hussein to call him himself because that person is more likely to obey Hussein. The two ended the call at this point.

The call reveals that not only are these armed groups trained to use weapons, commit massacres, mutilate bodies and steal military uniforms and equipment, but are also trained to participate in the media misdirection against Syria, making the satellite channels that broadcast such videos accomplices in the crimes and massacres committed by armed terrorist groups against civilians, policemen and security and army personnel.

IDLEB, (SANA) – A number of Jisr al-Shughour inhabitants affirmed on Wednesday that armed groups ran rampant in the town, committing horrible massacres and throwing bodies in roads after mutilating them, saying that Jisr al-Shughour became a ghost town where heavily-armed gunmen wander and threaten the remaining population.

The citizen...s called on the army to intervene quickly and save them from these groups, warning against ambushes and landmines prepared by the armed groups in preparation for the army.

Abu Mohammad from Jisr al-Shughour told Syrian TV that he was with a group of 25 consisting of religious, economic and social figures tasked with meeting with citizens and protestors to listen to their demands and relay them to Idleb Governor, adding that many of these demands were addressed.

Abu Mohammad said that after three weeks, protests degenerated into verbal abuse, transgressions against public and private property, arson, demolitions and threats, and that a black list was posted on mosque doors, calling for shedding the blood of fourteen people including 4 mosque preachers and 10 citizens.

Abu Mohammad's car was burned during the events, along with two fire engines, police cars and other official vehicles, with the groups running rampant for a month and a half without security or police intervention.

He went on to say that violent protests erupted in Idleb last Friday, staying uin the street to late times and terrorizing people, rejecting calls by preachers and religious figures to end it for the sake of students who have exams.

Abu Mohammad said that some weapons and drugs smugglers attacked police stations in various areas and stole weapons from them, with one of the attackers killed in a dispute over "spoils."

"At 6 AM last Saturday, these people attacked the army recruiting department and took the personnel's weapons, then they attacked the telephone and post office at 2 PM and killed two security personnel, mutilating their bodies, cutting off their heads and crucifying them on a silo… they also used RPG rounds and blew up a detachment building with dynamite," he said.

Abu Mohammad said that the area director was wounded and removed from the area, and then the military security detachment was besieged with all kinds of weapons including grenades, RPGS and "weapons I never saw during my military service, all of which came from Turkey."

He pointed out that religious figures begged these groups to let them remove and bury eight bodies they dumped into Orontes River, but these groups refused and said they will execute anyone who moves them, adding that the armed group retrieved the bodies later, dug a large hole and buried them in it using a bulldozer.

Abu Mohammad went on to say that these groups demolished the security detachment with a bulldozer and slaughtered the 82 detachment personnel, cutting off their heads, disemboweling them, and ripping out their eyes, and stealing their personal belongings and possessions like common thieves.

He pointed out that these groups intend to reveal the mass graves later and claim that the security forces and the army committed these massacres, adding that all the people buried in them are security personnel who have families and children, and that none of them are civilians.

Abu Mohammad voiced his deep shock of the savagery of this rabble, saying that called for a "peaceful demonstration" and then had people fire the cannons used in Ramadan in the background while some of the protestors screamed that they are being bombed by airplanes while other filmed them to send the footage later to certain channel.

Another occupant of Jisr al-Shughour called Abu Khaled said he abandoned his house with his children to save them from the horrors he witnessed, saying that he saw hair-raising sights with bodies strewn in streets, some of them beheaded and naked.

Abu Khaled said that he went out in a protest until 5 PM without incident, but later that night they were woken by intense and random gunfire on homes and houses by armed men who were stationed across the empty city.

He said that the armed men threatened anyone who came out of their houses and fired at anyone who appeared, saying that the remaining people are prisoners in their own home.

Abu Khaled said that people were waiting for security forces to come and play their role, but were surprised to find out that all security and police stations were ransacked and its personnel massacred, as the armed men encircled them on the second day and blew them up, killing most of the people in them while the survivors were gunned down by the armed men.

He added that he pretended to be with the protestors to help the wounded, managing to transport 25 wounded people to the hospital, but on the next day the armed groups killed them and took them to a place where they buried them with a bulldozer.

Abu Khaled affirmed that the gangs are armed with automatic weapons, machineguns, grenades, RPGs and other unusual weapons.

In a similar testimony, Abu Ahmad said that what happened on Saturday and Sunday cannot be described, with the armed men terrorizing the entire town even children, attacking police stations in the area, the popular army guar post near the railroad tracks, the recruitment center and the post office.

Abu Ahmad, who lives near the post office, said that the armed men laid siege to the military security detachment used all kinds of weapons and explosives from quarries and dynamite stolen from the nearby dam, adding that the armed groups mutilated the bodies and buried them near the detachment to tell the media later that they are mass graves.

He said that the armed groups used mosque loudspeakers to terrorize the townspeople by saying that the army poisoned the town's water.

Abu Ahmad said that the city is full of weapons and besieged from all sides, and that its inhabitants are calling for the army to save them, warning them that the areas is surrounded by heavily-armed groups and that there are landmines everywhere, particularly in bridges and roads.

He said that all the weapons being used by the armed groups came from Turkey through a village called Kherbet al-Joz, adding that he saw firsthand the armed groups pretending to protest at night, filming their actions and claiming that the army is attacking them while in fact they were attacking the security detachment and using explosives against it

The World is at a critical crossroads. The Fukushima disaster in Japan has brought to the forefront the dangers of Worldwide nuclear radiation.Coinciding with the onset of the nuclear crisis in Japan, a new regional war theater has opened up in North Africa, under the disguise of a UN sponsored "humanitarian operation" with the mandate to "protect civilian lives".

These two seemingly unrelated events are of crucial importance in understanding both the nuclear issue as well as the ongoing US-NATO sponsored war, which has now extended its grip into Libya. The crisis in Japan has been described as "a nuclear war without a war". Its potential repercussions, which are yet to be fully assessed, are far more serious than the Chernobyl disaster, as acknowledged by several scientists.

The crisis in Japan has also brought into the open the unspoken relationship between nuclear energy and nuclear war. Nuclear energy is not a civilian economic activity. It is an appendage of the nuclear weapons industry which is controlled by the so-called defense contractors. The powerful corporate interests behind nuclear energy and nuclear weapons overlap. In Japan at the height of the disaster, "the nuclear industry and government agencies [were] scrambling to prevent the discovery of atomic-bomb research facilities hidden inside Japan's civilian nuclear power plants".[1] The media consensus is that the crisis at Fukushima's five nuclear power plants has been contained. The realties are otherwise. The Japanese government has been obliged to acknowledge that "the severity rating of its nuclear crisis ... matches that of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster". Moreover, the dumping of highly radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean constitutes a potential trigger to a process of global radioactive contamination. Radioactive elements have not only been detected in the food chain in Japan, radioactive rain water has been recorded in California:

"Hazardous radioactive elements being released in the sea and air around Fukushima accumulate at each step of various food chains (for example, into algae, crustaceans, small fish, bigger fish, then humans; or soil, grass, cow's meat and milk, then humans). Entering the body, these elements - called internal emitters - migrate to specific organs such as the thyroid, liver, bone, and brain, continuously irradiating small volumes of cells with high doses of alpha, beta and/or gamma radiation, and over many years often induce cancer".[2]

A New War Theater in North Africa

The War on Libya was launched within days of the Fukushima disaster. As we go to press, a dangerous process of military escalation is ongoing. NATO warplanes are hitting civilian targets in Libya including residential areas and government buildings in violation of international law.

The war on Libya is an integral part of the broader military agenda in the Middle East and Central Asia which until recently consisted of three distinct areas of conflict : Afghanistan and Pakistan (the AfPak War), Iraq, Palestine. A fourth war theater has opened up in North Africa, which raises the issue of escalation over a vast geographical area. These four war theaters are interrelated. They are part of a broader region of conflict, which extends from North Africa and the Middle East, engulfing a large part of the Mediterranean basin, to China's Western frontier with Afghanistan, and Northern Pakistan.

How does the war on Libya relate to this broader US-NATO military agenda?

Is a World War III scenario unfolding?

Is the use of nuclear weapons contemplated in North Africa?

With regard to nuclear doctrine, the concept of a US sponsored pre-emptive nuclear attack applies to a number of countries or "rogue states" including Libya. An all out war against the Qadhafi regime has been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than 20 years, Moreover, Libya was the first country to be tagged for a preemptive attack using tactical nuclear weapons.[3] The Clinton administration's plan to nuke Libya had been announced in no uncertain terms in a 1996 Department of Defense press briefing:

"[The] Air Force would use the B61-11 [nuclear weapon] against Libya's alleged underground chemical weapons plant at Tarhunah if the President decided that the plant had to be destroyed. 'We could not take [Tarhunah] out of commission using strictly conventional weapons,' Smith told the Associated Press. The B61-11 'would be the nuclear weapon of choice,' he [Assistant Secretary of Defense Harold P. Smith] told Jane Defence Weekly.[4]

Clinton's Defense Secretary William Perry had confirmed in a statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that "the U.S. retained the option of using nuclear weapons against countries [e.g. Libya] armed with chemical and biological weapons."[5] The Department of Defense's objective was to fast track the "testing" of the B61-11 nuclear bomb on an actual country and that country was Libya: "Even before the B61 came on line, Libya was identified as a potential target".[6]

While the 1996 plan to bomb Libya using tactical nuclear weapons was subsequently shelved, Libya was not removed from the "black list": "The Qadhafi regime" remains to this date a target country for a pre-emptive ("defensive") nuclear attack. As revealed by William Arkin in early 2002, "The Bush administration, in a secret policy review... [had] ordered the Pentagon to draft contingency plans for the use of nuclear weapons against at least seven countries, naming not only Russia and the "axis of evil" Iraq, Iran, and North Korea but also China, Libya and Syria.[7]

Operation Odyssey Dawn. Nuclear Weapons against Libya? How Real is the Threat?

Has the project to nuke Libya been definitively shelved or is Libya still being contemplated as a potential target for a nuclear attack? (This preface serves as an update on the potential dangers of a nuclear war against a defenseless non-nuclear State). The air campaign directed against Libya commenced on March 19, 2011. America deployed its Bat-shaped B-2 Spirit Stealth bombers operating out of the Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. Described as "deadly and effective", the B-2 was used as an instrument of "humanitarian warfare".

Barely two weeks after the commencement of the war, the Pentagon announced the testing of the B61-11 nuclear bomb using the same B-2 Stealth bombers which had been deployed to Libya at the very outset of Operation Odyssey Dawn. The B-2 Spirit Stealth bomber is the US Air Force's chosen "carrier" for the delivery of the B61-11 nuclear bomb. These timely tests pertained to the installed equipment, functionality and weapon's components of the B61-11 nuclear bomb. The tests were conducted by the B-2 bombers operating out of the same Air Force base, from which the B-2 bombing raid on Libya were conducted.[8]

Is the timing of these tests in any way related to the chronology of the Libya bombing campaign?

The U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command was in charge of both the JTA tests of the B61-11 as well as the deployment of three B-2 Spirit Stealth bombers to Libya on March 19 under operation Odyssey Dawn. Both the deployment of the B-2s to the Libya war theater as well as the tests of the equipment of the B61-11 (using the B-2 bomber for delivery) were coordinated out of Whiteman Air Force base.

America's Long War: The Global Military Agenda

The US has embarked on a military adventure, “a long war”, which threatens the future of humanity. The first two chapters of this E-book focus on the "Cult of Death and Destruction" underlying this global military agenda. US-NATO weapons of mass destruction are portrayed as instruments of peace. Mini-nukes are said to be "harmless to the surrounding civilian population". Pre-emptive nuclear war is portrayed as a "humanitarian undertaking". Nuclear war has become a multibillion dollar undertaking, which fills the pockets of US defense contractors. What is at stake is the outright "privatization of nuclear war".

US nuclear doctrine is intimately related to "America's War on Terrorism" and the alleged threat of Al Qaeda, which in a bitter irony is considered as an upcoming nuclear power. Under the Obama administration, Islamic terrorists are said to be preparing to attack US cities. Proliferation is tacitly equated with “nuclear terrorism”. Obama's nuclear doctrine puts particular emphasis on “nuclear terrorism” and on the alleged plans by Al Qaeda to develop and use nuclear weapons.

Chapter III focusses on America's Holy Crusade and the Battle for Oil. The “Global War on Terrorism” requires going after the terrorists, using advanced weapons systems. US foreign policy upholds a pre-emptive religious-like crusade against evil, which serves to obscure the real objectives of military action. In the inner consciousness of Americans, the attacks of September 11, 2001 justify acts of war and conquest against evil-doers. The Global War on Terrorism is presented as a “clash of civilizations”, a war between competing values and religions, when in reality it is an outright war of conquest, guided by strategic and economic objectives. The lies behind 9/11 are known and documented. The American people’s acceptance of this crusade against evil is not based on any rational understanding or analysis of the facts. "The American inquisition" purports to extend Washington’s sphere of influence. Military intervention is justified as part of an international campaign against “Islamic terrorists”. Its ultimate intention, which is never mentioned in press reports, is territorial conquest and control over strategic resources. Ironically, under the Global War on Terrorism, these plans of conquest are instrumented by covertly supporting Islamic paramilitary armies, which are then used to destabilize non-compliant governments and impose Western standards of "governance" and "democracy".

World War III Scenario

The contours of a World War III scenario are discussed in Chapter IV. The Pentagon’s global military design is one of world conquest. The military deployment of US-NATO forces is occurring in several regions of the World simultaneously. Militarization at the global level is instrumented through the US military's Unified Command structure: the entire planet is divided up into geographic Combatant Commands under the control of the Pentagon. According to (former) NATO Commander General Wesley Clark, the Pentagon’s military road-map consists of a sequence of war theaters: “[The] five-year campaign plan [includes]... a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.”

Chapter V focusses on war preparations pertaining to Iran, including the launching of a pre-emptive nuclear attack on the Islamic Republic. While Iran remains on the Pentagon's drawing board, a fundamental shift in the sequencing of military operations has occurred. The US-NATO-Israel alliance realizes that Iran has significant capabilities to respond and retaliate. With the onset of the US-NATO led war in North Africa, Washington and its allies have chosen to wage war on countries with lesser military capabilities. This factor in itself has been crucial in the decision by the US and its allies to put "the Iran operation" on hold, while launching a "humanitarian war" on Libya.

How to Reverse the Tide of War

Chapter VI focusses on antiwar actions directed against this diabolical military agenda. Central to an understanding of war, is the media campaign which grants it legitimacy in the eyes of public opinion. A good versus evil dichotomy prevails. The perpetrators of war are presented as the victims. Public opinion is misled: “We must fight against evil in all its forms as a means to preserving the Western way of life.” Breaking the "big lie" which upholds war as a humanitarian undertaking, means breaking a criminal project of global destruction, in which the quest for profit is the overriding force. This profit-driven military agenda destroys human values and transforms people into unconscious zombies.

The holding of mass demonstrations and antiwar protests is not enough. What is required is the development of a broad and well organized grassroots antiwar network, across the land, nationally and internationally, which challenges the structures of power and authority. People must mobilize not only against the military agenda, the authority of the state and its officials must also be challenged. This war can be prevented if people forcefully confront their governments, pressure their elected representatives, organize at the local level in towns, villages and municipalities, spread the word, inform their fellow citizens as to the implications of a nuclear war, initiate debate and discussion within the armed forces.

The object of this E-Book is to forcefully reverse the tide of war, challenge the war criminals in high office and the powerful corporate lobby groups which support them.

Break the American Inquisition.

Undermine the US-NATO-Israel military crusade.

Close down the weapons factories and the military bases.

Members of the armed forces should disobey orders and refuse to participate in a criminal war.

Bring home the troops.

Notes

1. See Yoichi Shimatsu, Secret Weapons Program Inside Fukushima Nuclear Plant? Global Research, April 12, 20112. Helen Caldicott, Fukushima: Nuclear Apologists Play Shoot the Messenger on Radiation, The Age, April 26, 20113. See Michel Chossudovsky, America's Planned Nuclear Attack on Libya, Global Research, March 25, 2011.4. Federation of American Scientists, The Nuclear Information Project: the B61-115. Ibid, See also Greg Mello, The Birth Of a New Bomb; Shades of Dr. Strangelove! Will We Learn to Love the B61-11? The Washington Post, June 1, 19976. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists - September/ October 1997, p. 27. For further details see Michel Chossudovsky, America's Planned Nuclear Attack on Libya, Global Research, March 25, 20017. See William Arkin, "Thinking the Unthinkable", Los Angeles Times, March 9, 2002.8. In late March or early April (prior to April 4), the B-2 Spirit Stealth bomber from the 509th Bomber Wing operating out of Whiteman Air Force Base, was used in the so-called "Joint Test Assembly" (JTA) of the B61 Mod 11 nuclear bomb.The announcement of these tests was made public on April 4; the precise date of the tests was not revealed, but one can reasonably assume that it was in the days prior to the April 4 press release by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA. Press Release, NNSA Conducts Successful B61-11 JTA Flight Test, April 4, 2011. For further details see Michel Chossudovsky, Dangerous Crossroads: Is America Considering the Use of Nuclear Weapons against Libya? Global Research, April 7, 2011

Armed men assault popular delegation at a camp near the Turkish borders

Jisr al-Shoughour, north west- Armed men who dominate a camp for the displaced people on Friday assaulted a popular delegation which were heading for the camp along with the Syrian Red Crescent in Jisr al-Shoughour to ask the displaced to come back home. "We have received phone calls from the families, women and children of the camp asking us to rescue them from the hunger, thirst and to bring them back to Jisr al-Shoughour… so we have formed a delegation and went to the village of Kherbat al-Jouz along with the Red Crescent," Sheikh Adnan al-Khateeb told the Syrian TV in an interview.

He added "Upon arriving at the Camp, armed men threw us heavily with stones from all directions, I was injured and the car window was broken, later I heard fire sounds."

"We went to the camp upon the request of the women who called us for help to get rid of the saboteurs who threaten them not to return back to their home," Sheikh Adnan said.

Crime has had on major media and traded with blood as theoldest Syrian terrorists killed the Syrian civilians were kidnapped and theirimage that the Syrian Arab Army of killing them to be pressure on the UNSecurity Council to pass a resolution condemning the SyrianState

The Syrian leadershiphasAmong other reforms and radical political change, including theconstitution of the country's transition toDemocratic political life as shehas invited all shades of opposition to dialogue andParticipation in thepolitical life of the opposition responded with more bloodshed andkillingTargeting of civilians and themilitary

The countries that pay lip service toprovide advice to the State of Syria to establish freedom and democracy ascountries Gulf are the same does not have in their countries parliaments and noelections but is a property laws dictatorship and do not give the minimum rightsof its citizens, if that in these countries but not limited to violating therights of women and not allowed to participate in political life and are notallowed to drive or attendfootball

That what is happening in Syria is not the demands of popularreforms and change, but it is an insurgency supported by the outskirts of itsterritory and global, that feed the Islamist extremist groups with money andweapons and are the groups most horrendous kinds of crimes against Syriancitizens in order to put pressure on the Syrian state to relinquish theirpositions to support the resistance movements in all of occupied Palestine, Iraqand South Lebanon

Some politicalforces in Lebanon and Turkey, which have been linked to the project the U.S. aggression against Syria, the smuggling of all kinds of weapons to terroristgroups in Syria and the evidence for that is that most of the trouble spots youget the military in the border areas, both in Idlib or inHoms............................................................................................................................

What the Al Jazeera and Arab is asystematic policy of Qatar and Saudi Arabia by order of the United States andWestern countriesDozens of reports from correspondents of foreign agenciesand stations and documented video and audio entry of armed groups by theborder.........................................................................................................................

AlJazeera English correspondent yesterday published a report on the orders of theinside diameter to expand the pumping media session before the Security Council, What is this but a hostile policy and a clear effect on the decisions of somecountries in the SecurityCouncil............................................................................................................................

Press reports Western portrayed and confirmed the entry of armedgroups, terrorist extremists of different nationalities is Syria are supportingextremist groups in Syria and this is conclusive evidence of the involvement ofthird parties to kill systematic happens in Syria against civilians, and themovements get in Syria is not for repair and not to change but is a hit and therhythm of the Syrian state sedition among the shades of itspeoplePoor intellectual and political thought of thefact that he knows what he wants policy-makersin the WestJust because heattends to hear the news bulletins and the Arab Peninsula, or other media, justlike the thought that he could have known the reality of the situation in Syria, through the fierce follow up to channel this life and the Syrian Arab Television

Channels of media incitement broadcast on the clock and sincethe morning what pretend that the massacre of the forces of the Syrian armyagainst civilians in Homs .. But the answer was clear and at all levels, andevidence that the bodies of the victims are people civilians, and some elementsof the maintenance of order was liquidated at the request of Qatar to show itbefore hours of the Security Council meetingAnd of course has beenliquidated by the armed terrorist gangs Support from the West and some Gulfstates to drop rapidly Syria in response to the desire of the West andZionism

[font="[font="Cambria"]What the Al Jazeera and Arab is a[/font] [font="Cambria"]systematic policy of Qatar and Saudi Arabia by order of the United States and[/font] [font="Cambria"]Western countries[/font][font="Cambria"]Dozens of reports from correspondents of foreign agencies[/font][font="Cambria"]and stations and documented video and audio entry of armed groups by the[/font][font="Cambria"]border[/font]

Yes please, do tell us about the "democracy/demVORcracY"** of the above mentioned, including Saudia and its islamic sattelites,like the gulf "princedoms", Qatar, Kuwait, UE/United Emirates and more.Whwn is the last time thy had "democratic" elections, grant the women equal rights?Not to forget that "demvorcracy" in the region aka "moshestan". When is the last time they had non-jew PM or president? You mean the ones they spit on?**An old Armenian adage- Քուրտը /արաբը որ շատ իւղ գտնէ ՈՌին կը քսէ .Այո ՈՌին կը քսէ համայն աշխարհը.Շունշանորդիներ -Kelb ibn klebگلب ابن گلاب

US officials, too, have expressed backing for those intent on toppling Assad, and senior lawmakers including Senator John McCain have said it's time to consider arming the rebel groups.Clinton poured cold water on such action."We really don't know who it is that would be armed," the top US diplomat told CBS News during a visit to Morocco, as she noted that Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri has expressed support for the Syrian rebels."Are we supporting Al-Qaeda in Syria?" she said. "Hamas is now supporting the opposition. Are we supporting Hamas in Syria?"…."Sometimes, overturning brutal regimes takes time and costs lives. I wish it weren't so," she said.….Clinton said US officials have met some leaders of the Syrian National Council, but they are not inside Syria proper."You're not going to bring tanks over the borders of Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan. That's not going to happen." She said she expected some groups would find ways to smuggle in automatic weapons, but delivering them effectively to rebel fronts would be difficult.While the US and other Western powers have called on Assad to step down, Clinton said the Syrian strongman has "very, very strong friends, if you look at Russia, China and Iran**, who are in there determined to keep Assad because he does their bidding, he buys their arms, he sells them oil."Moscow and Beijing have vetoed two United Nations resolutions condemning Syria, which is Tehran's principal ally in the Middle East.Clinton also appeared to signal to everyday Syrians that it was time to rise up against the regime."What about the people in Damascus, what about the people in Aleppo "

** See how she describes Iran a “very, very strong friend”.

PS. Some people will never learn from history, like you know who. They forget the fiasco of those so called crusades when those idiotic Europeans returned from the Middle East with their tails between their hind legs, bloodied noses an broken legs.

A major crime has happened on media channels today, resulted in cheaply selling the Syrian blood and destroying the reputation of the Syrian Arab Army, those channels have shown pictures of citizens kidnapped by terrorist individuals and claimed that the Army has done so, simply to pressurise and urge the UN Security Council for a resolution condemning Syria.

Great means of reform procedures and radical political changes have been taken by the Syrian leadership, the main of which is the new constitution of the country which aims to transfer the political life in Syria into a democratic one involving all the opposing parties and called them to dialogue.. However, they have strongly rejected any form of participation and responded by more killing of citizens and targeting military forces.

Those 'caring' countries of the Arab league lecturing us on how to establish freedom and democracy, do not even have them themselves, they lack the primary means of communication with their people such as Parliaments or even elections for a new president. All they have is a dictatorial regime based on the King and his laws... women in those countries are not allowed to vote or to be elected to high political positions, they can't even drive or watch a football match!!!

What is happening in Syria is not a demand for reforms and political changes; it's a group of extremist Islamic rebels supported by regional and global parties which support them with political, financial and military support. These armed gangs have committed horrific crimes against Syrian citizens to pressurise the Syrian leadership to stop supporting resistance movements in occupied Palestine, Iraq and South Lebanon.

Some political forces in Lebanon and Turkey, known to be linked to the aggressive American project against Syria, have facilitated the smuggling of all kinds of weapons to terrorist groups in Syria, the evidence is that most of the military tension is happening in areas at the borders, i.e Idlib and Homs.

What Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya are doing is a systematic policy lead by Qatar and Saudi Arabia and directed by orders from the United States and Western some countries

Dozens of reports done by correspondents of foreign agencies and tv channels have approved the presence/entry of armed groups into Syria across the borders, and these documents are supported with video tapes.

Al Jazeera English correspondent has published a report revealing some orders given by the government in Qatar to expand the misleading media war against Syria just before the Security Council meeting, this clearly shows the obvious, aggressive policy used to influence the decision taken by the participating countries.

Western press reports have approved the entry of some terrorist, extremist armed groups of foreign nationalities (other than Syrian) sent to help the already-existing armed groups inside the country. And this proves the involvement of external parties in the systematic killing happening in Syria against civilians and that the so called 'uprising' has nothing to do with reforms and changes.

It is important for the observer who is looking for the truth about what is happening in Syria to look at both sides of the argument and consider all the involved parties, watching Aljazeera alone or Addounia alone will only shine the light on one part of the truth with a lot of exaggeration.

Misleading, inciting media channels broadcast 24/7 what they call 'massacres of the Syrian Army against civilians in Homs' although there have been many clear evidences that the dead bodies belonged to some Security Force members, killed based on orders given from Qatar and shown hours before the security council meeting claiming the responsibility of the army for their death