Manmade Climate Change Caused by HAARP: NO CONSPIRACY-JUST THE FACTS

I have been wanting to write about HAARP for many years. What held me back? It was fear of being called “Conspiratorial” until now.

My readers know me as a writer of truth. I stay clear of topics which cannot be vetted. I’ve been reading about HAARP for years, but the globalists snicker and mock at anyone who dares to tread on their turf.

The only websites I would find on HAARP – although very thorough in the research, was still speculation without a solid foundation. For every website attempting to uncover the truth about HAARP, there would be ten more insisting that it was simply an instrument used for studying the ionosphere.

The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or HAARP, is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere. source

Sounds pretty innocuous, right? The reader will see that this monstrosity known as HAARP is anything but safe. And I will show proof that the concerns about HAARP through the years have not just come from conspiratorial minds.

Climate Change (Global Warming)

I will also show the reader that HAARP is being used to create not just changes in our climate, but now there are concerns from scientists that the earth’s magnetic field is shifting, and once again we see that this is a result from the harmful effects of HAARP.

HAARP is blowing holes in our ionosphere. Guess what occurs when the ionosphere has holes? CLIMATE CHANGE.

Some Facts about HAARP

***Notice how the “experts” always use the word “study” to preclude any dialogue of the true nature and intent of the HAARP scientists:

From britannica.com (This is what the so-called “experts” want us to believe)

HAARP, in full High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, scientific facility for studying the ionosphere, located near Gakona, Alaska. The main instrument is the Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI), an array of 180 radio antennas spread over an area of 0.13 square kilometer (33 acres).

The ionosphere is the outermost layer of Earth’satmosphere. It begins at about 50 kilometers (30 miles) above Earth’s surface and contains atoms and molecules that are ionized (that is, they lose an electron and become positively charged) by the Sun’sultraviolet light. The ionosphere is of particular importance for radio because low radio frequencies are reflected off the ionosphere, allowing for long-distance communications. At higher frequencies, radio communications with satellites pass through the ionosphere. The ionosphere is also where the auroras occur when solar wind particles collide with oxygen and nitrogen atoms.

The IRI transmits at frequencies between 2.7 and 10 MHz with a power of 3.6 megawatts. It transmits radio waves upward into the ionosphere, where they cause electrons to move in waves. HAARP is an ionospheric heater, so called because the excitation of electrons increases their temperature, and it is the most powerful ionospheric heater in the world. By altering the density of electrons in a specific region, scientists using HAARP can study how the ionosphere reacts to changing conditions.

Because of the ionosphere’s significance for radio communications, in the early 1990s the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy proposed the HAARP project, and the Air Force began construction in 1993. The site near Gakona was chosen because it was an area of flat ground that was in the North Polar region where auroras occur. The HAARP site was near a major highway but isolated enough that there were no nearby sources of electrical or radio interference. Responsibility for HAARP was transferred to the University of Alaska Fairbanks in 2015. source

European citizens are becoming increasingly concerned about the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), in principle a military defence programme run jointly by the US Air Force and Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska.

Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing on HAARP and other ‘non-lethal weapons’ in Brussels on 5 February 1998. In Parliament’s report of 14 January 1999 on the environment, security and foreign policy it was characterised as a weapons system which disrupts the climate. Considerable concerns were raised as to its legality under international law, its far-reaching impact on the environment and its ecological and ethical implications, which should be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing.

Since HAARP could potentially be related to EU policies, namely the environment, the Commission is asked to answer the following:

1.

Is HAARP considered a ‘weapon’? What is its purpose, where has it been installed and what are its powers?

2.

Does the Commission intend to take any measures in this regard to respond to the fears of citizens (impact on the environment, weather, health, etc.)?

Legal aspects of military activities

26. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new ‘non-lethal’ weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also covered and regulated by international conventions;

27. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its farreaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska; (emphasis added)

28. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local and global environment and to public health generally;

29. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the governments of Sweden, Finland, Norway and the Russian Federation, to examine the environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings;

30. Calls in particular for an international convention for a global ban on all research and development, whether military or civilian, which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment of such systems;

31. Calls on the European Union and its Member States to work for the establishment of international treaties to protect the environment from unnecessary destruction in the event of war;

32. Calls on the European Union and its Member States to work towards the establishment of international standards for the environmental impact of peacetime military activities;

33. Calls on the Council to play an active part in the implementation of the proposals of the Canberra Commission and Article 6 of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty on nuclear disarmament;

34. Calls on the Council, and the British and French governments in particular, to take the lead within the framework of the NPT and the Conference on Disarmament with regard to the further negotiations towards full implementation of the commitments on nuclear weapons reductions and elimination as rapidly as possible to a level where, in the interim, the global stock of remaining weapons poses no threat to the integrity and sustainability of the global environment;

35. Calls on the Presidency of the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States to advocate the approach taken in this resolution in all further United Nations meetings held under the auspices of or in relation to the NPT and the Conference on Disarmament;

36. Calls on the Presidency of the Council and the Commission, in accordance with Article J.7 of the Treaty on European Union, to report to it on the Union”s position concerning the specific points contained in this Resolution within the context of forthcoming meetings of the United Nations, its agencies and bodies, notably the 1999 Preparatory Committee of the NPT, the Conference on Disarmament and all other relevant international fora;

37. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Member States of the European Union and to the United Nations. source

It is clear that our government is not only keeping the facts regarding the true nature of HAARP from the American people; but REFUSED to attend a meeting of the EU Parliament in 1998 to answer their questions and concerns about HAARP.

Square Clouds

Never seen before: Square clouds……..a natural phenomenon? Or perhaps a telltale sign of HAARP at work…….

2030 Warnings from U.N. and Globalists Everywhere

We have been hearing warnings that if we don’t get “Global Warming” under control by 2030, there will be catastrophic results for our planet. We were warned by a freshman member of Congress. We are being warned by the fake news media outlets. Why are they using a specific year?

I believe that they are giving a specific year as a way to intimidate the public. They know that HAARP is causing “Climate Change” and they also know that it is HAARP which is causing the shift/flip in the earth’s magnetic field.

When the Global Warming (Climate Change) people are demanding that all nations must adopt the U.N. 2030 resolution on regulations for every nation; and claim that the Climate Change is “manmade” – ironically, this is now truth. But it’s not companies or fossil fuel emissions or automobile emissions causing the changes.

IT IS HAARP and the scientists who oversee it. Well planned, wouldn’t you say? Deceptive and immoral, but that is how they operate.

On 5 February 1998 Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the subject of which included HAARP. NATO and the US had been invited to send representatives, but chose not to do so. The Committee regrets the failure of the USA to send a representative to answer questions, or to use the opportunity to comment on the material submitted.(21)

HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is run jointly by the US Air Force and Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Similar experiments are also being conducted in Norway, probably in the Antarctic, as well as in the former Soviet Union.(22) HAARP is a research project using a ground based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of ionosphere with powerful radio beams.(23) The energy generated heats up parts of the ionosphere; this results in holes in the ionosphere and produces artificial ‘lenses’. (emphasis added).

HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system.

The project would also allow better communications with submarines and manipulation of global weather patterns, but it is also possible to do the reverse, to disrupt communications. By manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one’s own. Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities. Over-the-horizon radar is another application, looking round the curvature of the earth for in-coming objects.

From the 1950s the USA conducted explosions of nuclear material in the Van Allen Belts(24) to investigate the effect of the electro-magnetic pulse generated by nuclear weapon explosions at these heights on radio communications and the operation of radar. This created new magnetic radiation belts which covered nearly the whole earth. The electrons travelled along magnetic lines of force and created an artificial Aurora Borealis above the North Pole. These military tests are liable to disrupt the Van Allen belt for a long period. The earth’s magnetic field could be disrupted over large areas, which would obstruct radio communications. According to US scientists it could take hundreds of years for the Van Allen belt to return to normal. HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions.

Another damaging consequence of HAARP is the occurrence of holes in the ionosphere caused by the powerful radio beams. The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. The hope is that the holes will fill again, but our experience of change in the ozone layer points in the other direction. This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us. (emphasis added)

With its far-reaching impact on the environment HAARP is a matter of global concern and we have to ask whether its advantages really outweigh the risks. The environmental impact and the ethical aspect must be closely examined before any further research and testing takes place. HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.

HAARP has links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes, including the Star Wars project, to control the upper atmosphere and communications. This kind of research has to be regarded as a serious threat to the environment, with an incalculable impact on human life. Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have. We have to beat down the wall of secrecy around military research, and set up the right to openness and democratic scrutiny of military research projects, and parliamentary control.

A series of international treaties and conventions (the Convention on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, the Antarctic Treaty, the Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies, and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) casts considerable doubt on HAARP on legal as well as humanitarian and political grounds. The Antarctic Treaty lays down that the Antarctic may be used exclusively for peaceful purposes.(25) This would mean that HAARP is a breach of international law. All the implications of the new weapons systems should be examined by independent international bodies. Further international agreements should be sought to protect the environment from unnecessary destruction in war.

Impact of military activities on the environment

Not only military weapons systems but, by and large, all military activities, including peace-time exercises, have some form of environmental impact. However, when environmental destruction has been discussed, the role of the military has not in general been touched upon, only the impact of civilian society on the environment has been criticised. There are at least two explanations for this.(26) Owing to its secrecy, military activity is more difficult to discuss and it is difficult to set the nation’s top priority – its security and defence – against the environment. At the present time, however, when environmental and natural disasters constitute a serious threat to security, these arguments are more dubious. The armed forces endeavour to prepare themselves in peace time for operations in war in as realistic conditions as possible. They therefore carry out their exercises under warlike conditions, which involves subjecting the environment to great stress. This is illustrated, for instance, by the withdrawal of Soviet troops and the abandoned military bases in Eastern and Central Europe which have left deep scars on the local environment. Military exercises entail widespread damage to the landscape and animal life. Troop exercises subject large tracts of land to extensive environmental destruction. Test sites for artillery and tactical missiles tend to require larger surfaces for military purposes. Likewise, production of munitions and the industry that manufactures military equipment cause widespread environmental problems.

The military is responsible for emissions of several gases affecting the climate, primarily carbon dioxide, but also incineration of fossil fuels and emissions of freons, which results in the depletion of the ozone layer.(27) Consumption of aviation fuel is a major source of emissions of acidifying substances such as nitrogen oxides and sulphur oxide. The armed forces account for much of all consumption of aviation fuel and are responsible for a very large proportion of all aviation emissions.(28) High-flying planes and rockets have a particularly damaging impact on the environment, both in the form of noise and fuel emissions. All rockets using solid fuel emit large quantities of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust emissions and every flight of a space shuttle injects around 75 tonnes of ozone-destroying chlorine. Likewise, noise from military exercises using heavy calibre ammunition may bring about environmental disruption.

Metal pollution is dispersed into the environment through shooting practice; often large quantities of small calibre ammunition containing lead is used and large quantities of lead are dispersed into the environment. Unfortunately, there is no comprehensive information about consumption of metals.

Consequences in the form of environmental problems caused by disarmament is only a recently observed phenomenon. Every year, large quantities of explosive substances are destroyed, mostly through industrial processes. Some ammunition cannot be destroyed in this way for various reasons but must be detonated. Obviously, scaling down is a necessary and positive process but it must be carried out in environmentally acceptable ways. Environmentally sound technology must be developed for the purpose of destroying weapons.

Several nations have already begun to exploit the opportunities for using military-related resources to restore the environment destroyed by the armed forces. All other sectors in society have to take responsibility for the environment and the military sector should also do so. As in other sectors of society, environmental issues must form an integral part of the armed forces’ activities and be incorporated in the decision-making and budgetary processes.

In May 1993, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) took a decision – ‘application of environmental norms to military establishments’ – to encourage national governments to enact national laws for the military sector. Finland, for example, has drawn up a green paper to regulate the impact of military activities on the environment. Sweden has followed suit.(29) In June 1996 Sweden, in conjunction with the USA, also drew up environmental guidelines for military activities.(30) The military should establish environmental targets and proposals for measures to help reduce the impact on the environment in accordance with Agenda 21 and the Rio Declaration.(31) They should also submit reports identifying factors affecting the environment within the armed forces. Environmental impact assessments must be drawn up before new projects commence and when procuring material for civilian and military use.

Every government should take stock of its environmental requirements and identify the military resources which are available for environmental purposes, draw up national environment plans and report their experience to an appropriate body within the European Union and the United Nations.

All military personnel, including conscripts, should receive basic training in environmental matters. The US armed forces are considered to be quite advanced in this respect, particularly in terms of equipment, but also in regard to training. The European Union should cooperate and exchange experience in this sector with the USA to a greater extent.

Strategies for using military resources for environment-enhancing purposes

Prevention of environmental crises requires infrastructure, organisation and increased resources. These are available in the armed forces. Many resources within the military sector could be used to protect, improve and restore the environment. Essentially, this would be based on two stages: a stocktaking stage to assess the suitability of the military resources and a political action plan to guarantee their availability.

Obviously, military-related resources vary a great deal from one country to another but they comprise skilled personnel, engineers, sophisticated hi-tech equipment, organisational ability and military research and development. In many ways, the military sector is in a unique position to strengthen international civilian capacity to implement environmental strategies. Military personnel are wellequipped to intervene in the event of disasters. As distinct from civilian forces, the military are trained to carry out missions under extreme conditions. They can also be called out in the event of environmental accidents and to clear up and destroy high-grade toxic, radioactive and other hazardous substances.

The armed forces also possess a great quantity of information which can help in detecting changes in the atmosphere, the sea and in the earth’s surface and thereby provide an early warning and forestall environmental disasters. Military satellites, aeroplanes, surface vessels and submarines are capable of collecting further information on climate changes and on currents and temperature changes in the sea. Radar, which was developed for military purposes, can be used for environmental objectives. Infrared radar can detect temperature changes in the earth’s surface. For example, American military satellites have been used to establish the number of whales, classify them and save them.

Environmental problems are global in nature and international cooperation is therefore crucial to prevent future environmental disasters. Joint international work can also serve a ‘dual’ purpose; it can build confidence for the very reason that it is carried out jointly – countries assist each other. It can also enable countries to shoulder a reasonable amount of responsibility for the environment in proportion to their strength.(32) Some important areas for joint undertakings might be technology transfer, joint training and education.

Environmental strategies might comprise monitoring the earth’s environment, evaluating the data collected, coordinating scientific work and disseminating information. As a special form of international aid, national resources should be made available to the EU and the UN so that they may be used on request by a country stricken by an environmental disaster. Environmental strategies must also include a global stocktaking of resources suitable for environmental protection.

A disaster force composed of both civilian and military personnel could be set up for deployment in emergency situations. Taking part in international peace-keeping and humanitarian missions is already an important task for the military. However, a distinction must be made between such missions within national boundaries and within another state’s jurisdiction. Lessons can be learned from UN experiences in this respect and, clearly, exercises or deployment on the territory of another nation must take place in accordance with international laws. We should consider which resources can be made available to the UN or the European Union, temporarily, long-term or on a standby basis as instruments for joint cooperation in the event of environmental disasters and environmental crises.

Military bilateral and multilateral cooperation has increased tremendously. Within NATO, a DanishGerman-Polish force is being developed which it will also be possible to use for civilian disaster aid, in addition to having traditional tasks. It is expected to be operational by spring 1999.

Technological resources within the military establishment

The military sectors of the EU Member States tend to be research and development-intensive. In the case of the major military powers, technological capacity is not only extensive but has also largely remained unaffected by budget cutbacks in comparison with conventional weapons. The process of developing new sophisticated weapons is ongoing. The military sector will probably be a leading consumer of advanced technology in the immediate future.

Most modern technologies are double-edged, i.e. they can be used both for military and civilian purposes. This means that military-related technologies can be transferred to the civilian sector without expensive modifications. However, it must be borne in mind that the highly complicated military systems which are based on advanced technologies are not designed for environmental purposes but require certain adjustments.

The technological capacity of military organisations in most developing countries is not a match for the environmental problems they face. The CIS and African countries have tremendous shortages of technology and environmental know-how. In an international perspective, therefore, transfer of technology and know-how is an extremely important task for the military.

Collection of environmental data and observations can be facilitated by the use of vessels, aeroplanes and spacecraft to identify and trace environmental abuse such as the dumping of waste and oil or natural hazards such as forest fires.

Another possible application of military-related resources is to use military capacity to monitor activities which are potentially damaging to the environment. Military resources can also be used to monitor agriculture, drought, afforestation and other forms of land conservation. Other areas of application might be as aid in developing countries, e.g. in the form of transport and disaster work, liming of lakes and forest with the aid of military aircraft and vessels but also combating of oil discharges and research and development resources for global environment work.

Military personnel on environment duty – an example

The Swedish Parliament decided on 13 December 1996 to make environmental protection a special part of its defence policy and, in the long-term, to train 10 000 conscripts per year within the civil defence.(33) The decision has not yet been implemented but formed the basis for a proposal put forward by a group of officers.(34) The proposal was presented to a hearing of the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament on 19 May 1998 and is summarised in brief below.(35)

It is entirely possible during compulsory military training to train soldiers in environmental protection and it is also necessary in order to have the resources and capacity to deal with environmental problems. Introducing military training in environment duty makes use of society’s existing resources and creates a new resource for international environment work.

Training of ‘environment soldiers’ can take place in cooperation with the various authorities responsible for overall defence, local authorities, county councils, universities and colleges but also environmental organisations, industry (e.g. the petro-chemical industry, the power industry, the mining industry and other processing industry) and international bodies.

Conscripts on environmental service should primarily be trained to deal with the greater environmental threat existing in war but also be used as a rescue and relief force in peace time and war. Under the proposal, the training would, in its final phase, comprise six companies per environmental brigade in two batches, i.e. a total of 12 companies per brigade per year. Training would be led by an instructor, an officer in charge of reconnaisance and information and a commandant. Under the overall command, there would be six environmental companies comprising a company commander, an environmental engineer, company engineers, an adjutant and 12 instructors. The environmental engineer would also be in close contact with the emergency and rescue services and with researchers. As backup, they would have a unit for finance, personnel, a material division, catering and conscripts on environment and defence duty. At the initial stage, the group commanders are given training in leadership and some basic training in environmental protection work.

In the introductory phase of training, soldiers should be given basic training in soldiering and environmental protection with the emphasis on military training and physical fitness. This is followed by environmental training and training in the use of equipment relating to the soldiers’ respective duties. The final phase of training will be used for predetermined environmental projects. During basic training, environment conscripts may also be used in serious environmental disasters – apart from the planned environmental projects – to assist in the event of forest fires, snowstorms, landslides etc.

Had environmental brigades been operating, they could have intervened swiftly and effectively during the floods in Poland, the Czech Republic and Germany in 1997 and during the dam disaster in Spain and the landslides in Italy in 1998.

Following basic training in peace time and under war conditions, and for five years afterwards, trainees should be called up for 24 to 48 hours in the event of environmental disasters or any other emergency situation. This could be mandatory or on a voluntary basis.

In an operational context, the environmental protection company is a mobile unit whose main duty is to respond, within and beyond the nation’s borders, to requests from Swedish local authorities or other nations for relief operations. (In Sweden alone there are 10 000 ‘environmental bombs’ of various kinds in need of ‘defusing’.) The company is to carry out its duties independently or in cooperation with other companies and units from the emergency and rescue services under the command of those services and/or the local authority requesting their intervention. Using its own transport resources the company should be able to perform various missions within the country for a duration of 72 hours. source

This carefully documented article on Weather Warfare was first published by Global Research on August 1, 2010.

Some small edits have been made. The CBC, History Channel and Trutv.com (removed) documentaries quoted in the article can now be viewed. They by no means can be considered as “conspiracy theorists”. Morever, the US Air Force has referred to “Owning the Weather for Military Use”.

Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally… It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, … and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide substantial increase in US, or degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power. (US Air Force, emphasis added. Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report,

*** I would strongly encourage the reader to print out this article. As you will see, many links, quotes and articles have already been scrubbed from our Internet.

“It isn’t just conspiracy theorists who are concerned about HAARP. The European Union called the project a global concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its health and environmental risks. Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility.”

— Quote from a TV documentary on HAARP by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC).

HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a little-known, yet critically important U.S. military defense program which has generated quite a bit of controversy over the years in certain circles. Though denied by HAARP officials, some respected researchers allege that secret electromagnetic warfare capabilities of HAARP are designed to forward the US military’s stated goal of achieving full-spectrum dominance by the year 2020. Others go so far as to claim that HAARP can and has been used for weather modification, to cause earthquakes and tsunamis, to disrupt global communications systems, and more.

Major aspects of the program are kept secret for alleged reasons of “national security.” Yet there is no doubt that HAARP and electromagnetic weapons capable of being used in warfare do exist. According to the official HAARP website, “HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.” The ionosphere is the delicate upper layer of our atmosphere which ranges from about 30 miles (50 km) to 600 miles (1,000 km) above the surface of the Earth.

The HAARP website acknowledges that experiments are conducted which use electromagnetic frequencies to fire pulsed, directed energy beams in order to “temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere.” Some scientists state that purposefully disturbing this sensitive layer could have major and even disastrous consequences. Concerned HAARP researchers like Dr. Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa and Alaska’s Dr. Nick Begich (son of a US Congressman) present evidence suggesting that these disturbances can even cause tsunamis and earthquakes. ****to the reader: if you click on the link to Dr. Chossudovsky, you will see that what he had to say has been scrubbed from the Internet. But the Begich link is partially operational.

Two key major media documentaries, one by Canada’s public broadcasting network CBC (see below) and the other by the History Channel (below), reveal the inner workings of HAARP in a most powerful way. The very well researched CBC documentary includes this key quote:

“It isn’t just conspiracy theorists who are concerned about HAARP. In January of 1999, the European Union called the project a global concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its health and environmental risks. Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility.”

The actual wording at bullet point 24 in this telling document states that the EU “considers HAARP by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing.” This reveling document further states that the EU regrets the repeated refusal of the U.S. government to send anyone to give evidence on HAARP.

For an even more detailed and revealing 45-minute History Channel documentary on HAARP and other secret weapons used for electromagnetic warfare, click here. Below are two quotes from the History Channel documentary: *** this also has been scrubbed. Are you seeing a pattern here?

“Electromagnetic weapons … pack an invisible wallop hundreds of times more powerful than the electrical current in a lightning bolt. One can blast enemy missiles out of the sky, another could be used to blind soldiers on the battlefield, still another to control an unruly crowd by burning the surface of their skin. If detonated over a large city, an electromagnetic weapon could destroy all electronics in seconds. They all use directed energy to create a powerful electromagnetic pulse.”

“Directed energy is such a powerful technology it could be used to heat the ionosphere to turn weather into a weapon of war. Imagine using a flood to destroy a city or tornadoes to decimate an approaching army in the desert. The military has spent a huge amount of time on weather modification as a concept for battle environments. If an electromagnetic pulse went off over a city, basically all the electronic things in your home would wink and go out, and they would be permanently destroyed.”

History Channel Documentary

For those who still doubt that such devastating secret weapons have been developed, here is an intriguing quote from an article in New Zealand’s leading newspaper, the New Zealand Herald: **** the link has been scrubbed but you can read a quote from the original article here:

“Top-secret wartime experiments were conducted off the coast of Auckland to perfect a tidal wave bomb, declassified files reveal. United States defence chiefs said that if the project had been completed before the end of the war, it could have played a role as effective as that of the atom bomb. Details of the tsunami bomb, known as Project Seal, are contained in 53-year-old documents released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.”

If the military secretly developed a weapon which could cause a tsunami over half a century ago, what kind of advanced deadly weapons might be available now?

And why is it that the general public still doesn’t know about secret weapons developed over 50 years ago?

To understand why the media isn’t covering these highly critical issues, click here. Clearly the military has the capability to cause a tsunami and likely to cause earthquakes and hurricanes, as well. It’s time for us to take action to spread the word on this vital topic.

Having interpreted to four top generals in my work as a language interpreter with the US Department of State, I learned that military planners are always interested in developing the most devastating weapons possible. Yet these weapons are kept secret as long as possible, allegedly for reasons of national security. The many layers of intense secrecy both in the military and government result in very few people being aware of the gruesome capabilities for death and destruction that have been developed over the years. There are many examples of major defense projects kept successfully out of the public’s eyes for years and even decades.

The massive Manhattan Project (development of the first atomic bomb) is one such example. The building of an entire city to support the project in Oak Ridge, Tennessee was successfully kept secret even from the state’s governor. The stealth bomber was kept top secret for many years, and the public still has no way of knowing it’s full capabilities. It is through the use of the highly organized military and intelligence services that the power elite of our world, working in cooperation with key allies in government and corporate ownership of the media, are able to carry out major cover-ups and secret operations like those involved with HAARP.

Some researchers have raised questions about the possible involvement of HAARP in major disasters like the earthquake in Haiti, Indonesian tsunami, and hurricane Katrina. Could these have been HAARP experiments gone awry? Might they even have been caused by rogue elements which gained control of this devastating technology. Of course disasters like this happen regularly on a natural basis, yet if you begin to research, there is some high strangeness around some of these disasters. The evidence is inconclusive, yet with the known and unknown major destructive capabilities of this weapon, serious questions remain.

European citizens are becoming increasingly concerned about the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), in principle a military defence programme run jointly by the US Air Force and Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska.

Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing on HAARP and other ‘non-lethal weapons’ in Brussels on 5 February 1998. In Parliament’s report of 14 January 1999 on the environment, security and foreign policy it was characterised as a weapons system which disrupts the climate. Considerable concerns were raised as to its legality under international law, its far-reaching impact on the environment and its ecological and ethical implications, which should be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing.

Since HAARP could potentially be related to EU policies, namely the environment, the Commission is asked to answer the following:

1.

Is HAARP considered a ‘weapon’? What is its purpose, where has it been installed and what are its powers?

2.

Does the Commission intend to take any measures in this regard to respond to the fears of citizens (impact on the environment, weather, health, etc.)?

“Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its farreaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska;

“military research is ongoing on environmental manipulation as a weapon

“HAARP – a weapons system which disrupts the climate

“On 5 February 1998 Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the subject of which included HAARP.

“Legal aspects of military activities

“Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the governments of Sweden, Finland, Norway and the Russian Federation, to examine the environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings;

The European Parliament required the EU Commission to help setup an independent body to examine this low to high frequency weapon and also required the EU commission to work with the Russian Federation along with others to examine HAARP and report back. The EU Commission’s actions are referenced later on in this article but let’s get back to this EU document for now:

“HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is run jointly by the US Air Force and Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Similar experiments are also being conducted in Norway, probably in the Antarctic, as well as in the former Soviet Union. HAARP is a research project using a ground based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of ionosphere with powerful radio beams. The energy generated heats up parts of the ionosphere; this results in holes in the ionosphere and produces artificial ‘lenses’.

“HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter.

“The project would also allow better communications with submarines and manipulation of global weather patterns, but it is also possible to do the reverse, to disrupt communications.

The non-military HAARP work done by the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska is published and released. We will aslo look at some of that data later. Back to the EU document:

“Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities. Over-the-horizon radar is another application, looking round the curvature of the earth for in-coming objects.

“HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions.

“The environmental impact and the ethical aspect must be closely examined before any further research and testing takes place. HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.

“HAARP has links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes

“We have to beat down the wall of secrecy around military research”

Let’s jump back to the 1998 EU Security hearing on HAARP. The EU’s press archives from 09/02/2008 state the following:

“Electromagnetic waves can cause earthquakes or tidal waves. Mr SPENCER pointed out that, under international conventions, any actions leading to climate change were prohibited.”

The ionosphere like a lens redirects HAARP’s enormous amounts of energy and when pointed back down to penetrate the earth effects the rock-bed, which given a short amount of time (at maximum no more than a few days) has proven in laboratory experiments to build up vibrations and cause rocks to shift. Rock-beds shifting or sliding in the earth causes earthquakes. People seriously concerned about ionosphere, atmosphere, and climate change should look more deeply into HAARP’s other applications.

As EU representative Mr Spencer pointed out there are old treaties on such weapons. In the European Parliament’s motion for a resolution document it mentions the following, “A series of international treaties and conventions (the Convention on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, the Antarctic Treaty […] the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) […] The Antarctic Treaty lays down that the Antarctic may be used exclusively for peaceful purposes.” Although government treaties are signed and published on weather modification the general public are in the dark on these issues. These treaties do not prohibit the use of environmental weapons in any regions a military has jurisdiction over or for uses that can go under the spectrum called peaceful purposes (which can also mean ‘tests’). Seemingly unrelated treaties that give other governments airspace jurisdiction in new regions, such as the UN’s Open Skies treaty, can allow military tests to take place legally. Some tests are made public while tests of national security are confidential. The U.S. military has and does work with other nation’s militaries and the HAARP electromagnetic facility in Alaska can be used in conjunction with other militaries’ electromagnetic facilities.

Carnegie Endowment lists The United Nations 1977 ENMOD treaty on weather modification. Here is a paragraph from that UN treaty:

“It is the understanding of the Committee that the following examples are illustrative of phenomena that could be caused by the use of environmental modification techniques as defined in Article II of the Convention: earthquakes, tsunamis; an upset in the ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones of various types and tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ocean currents; changes in the state of the ozone layer; and changes in the state of the ionosphere.” (emphasis added)

The European Parliament motion for a resolution on HAARP took place on January 14, 1999. In 2004 MEP, Paul Lannoye, asked the following question to the EU Commission (using the EU’s online question/answer program):

“In paragraph 26, Parliament called on the Commission to examine the possible environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings. Five years later, I am not aware of the existence of any such report.

“Would the Commission explain what initiatives have been taken regarding this affair?”

The MEP’s EU Commission never answered his question. However, the EU have a journal that is released every single working day. There are thousands of these published. MEPs are not given enough time to read all the legislation going through the EU let alone have time to read every EU Journal printed every working day. A year earlier one paragraph in one of the thousands of EU Journals answered that question. Keep in mind that the EU has a long history of setting-up investigational bodies in all ranges of fields and praising those bodies’ paid experts, that HAARP is so important with regards to changing the climate, and how the EU harp on about CO2 taxes to combat extreme climate changes. As printed in the Official Journal of the European Union here is the action the EU Commission decided to take on HAARP, four years after the European parliament voted to adopt the resolution by 127 votes in favour to 21 against:

“The High frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP) for Arctic Europe is a military programme. The Commission has no competence, nor indeed the expertise, to carry out the examination requested by the Parliament in paragraph 26 of its Resolution.”

Even setting up a group just to investigate from the outside and publish reports, even if whitewashed, would raise public awareness of the weapon which of course would be negative for the United States who has a “special relationship” with the European Union. The other reason the EU Commission stated for the EU not looking at the environmental and public health implications of this weapon is because it’s a “military programme”. The EU Commission are telling the truth on that account, legally parliaments/congress are not allowed to examine what branches of their own government, that go under the umbrella called national security, are currently doing in confidence (and the public don’t get to choose who runs national security governance). The United States “Iran-Contra Affair”, which is listed in all encyclopaedias for at least the past 16 years, shows a clear incident of this which was somehow exposed so much that it could not be suppressed and court proceedings took place (unfortunately for the National Security Council and others involved). Normally confidential documents are declassified decades later when all participants are dead, which means no one can be charged and brought to court, unlike what happened with the “Iran-Contra Affair” when it was exposed, and by the time it’s declassified nobody cares (”that was in the old corrupt days”). It’s defiantly worth getting out the old dusty encyclopaedia, even for an overview.

“President Chavez said the US was “playing God” by testing devices capable of creating eco-type catastrophes, the Spanish newspaper ABC quoted him as saying.

“Chavez said the killer earthquake followed a test of ‘weapon of earthquakes’

“Venezuelan media have reported that the earthquake ‘may be associated with the project called HAARP, a system that can generate violent and unexpected changes in climate.’”

Like the EU Chavez knows about HAARP, but were branches of the U.S. prepared for a natural disaster to strike Haiti on Tuesday the 12th of January? A reliable source of information, reliable on what the U.S. government say they are doing, is from a publishing company that provides reading material to congress and the Federal government. On the 15th of January 2010 “NextGov – Technology and the business of government” published the following paragraph in one of their articles:

“On Monday, Jean Demay, DISA’s technical manager for the agency’s Transnational Information Sharing Cooperation project, happened to be at the headquarters of the U.S. Southern Command in Miami preparing for a test of the system in a scenario that involved providing relief to Haiti in the wake of a hurricane. After the earthquake hit on Tuesday, Demay said SOUTHCOM decided to go live with the system.”

The U.S. Southern Command were all set to travel to Haiti for a natural disaster scenario when a natural disaster hit. Odds greater than a psychopathic husband getting life insurance on his wife and right after it’s approved she dies in an accident. The general public, who don’t know of the very existence of HAARP, such a connection would not occur. For anyone who knows and cares to check, the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska has a HAARP monitoring system which shows when electric currents are in the ionosphere and at what levels. The HAARP Induction Monitor shows another “just happened to be” connection. It shows at 4pm UTC (which is the same time as London) on Sunday January 10th the electrical currents in the ionosphere jumped a massive amount, remained throughout Monday at this high level, continued on Tuesday at the same high level for 15 hours and ceded just less than seven hours before the earthquake was unleashed upon the surface of Haiti’s heavily populated capital. Certainly that would confirm Venezuela’s government information that the earthquake followed a U.S. HAARP test.

The Air Force Times, part of the The Military Times Media Group, published (text below) that it just happened to be that 7 United States Southern Command members arrived in Haiti on January 12th the very day of the Earthquake and 6 of them survived who just happened to be standing outside the hotel when it collapsed. The one who got trapped inside the hotel was normally just a desk officer for Southern Command headquarters in Miami, formerly a pilot. He should have been standing outside on the street with the other SOUTHCOM members but he decided to send his wife a quick email and got caught in the collapse. Here is the text from The Air Force Times:

“Bourland, 37, had flown into Haiti from the Dominican Republic the morning of the earthquake with Lt. Gen. Ken Keen, deputy director of U.S. Southern Command. He sent his wife an e-mail with “Wow Haiti” in the subject line just minutes before the earthquake hit

“The airman, whose name Peggy Bourland couldn’t remember, was one of the five other members of U.S. Southern Command traveling with Keen and Bourland. All five, also staying in the hotel, escaped. Keen, outside the hotel at the time of the earthquake, is now overseeing U.S. military aid as commander of Joint Task Force Haiti.”

SOUTHCOM had ships prepared and their personnel were told they were going to Haiti for natural disaster training when the command informed them a real natural disaster hit Haiti, the United States SOUTHCOM including it’s deputy director who is now overseeing the military arrived in Haiti on the day of the earthquake, the United Nations in 1977 stated earthquakes can be created by militaries, the EU stated HAARP can create earthquakes, the Venezuelan government said the U.S. used an environmental weapon before the earthquake, and the ionosphere was full of massive amounts of electrical currents right before the earthquake hit as measured by the HAARP monitor. Would the military branches of the U.S. be shy to kill poor Haitians resulting from a HAARP earthquake? If Iraq or Vietnam is anything to go by that answer would have to be no. Over one and a half million citizens have died in Iraq because of the United States invasion. The death toll in Haiti is not that high, but so far over 150 thousand have died. SOUTHCOM and other branches of the United States government now have real hands on experience for their scheduled Haiti test. As the European Parliament put it about HAARP in the 1999 EU document:

“The armed forces endeavour to prepare themselves in peace time for operations in war in as realistic conditions as possible. They therefore carry out their exercises under warlike conditions, which involves subjecting the environment to great stress.”

Haiti, located in North America, is a member state of the Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) which has U.S. Caribbean territory Puerto Rico as a participant. The United States have no qualms of entering poor Haiti’s jurisdiction, it’s not the first time the United States military have been there. In 1915 the United States invaded Haiti and began a military occupation. The occupation was resented by the Haitians and it was not until 19 years later (1934) that the last U.S. marines left, lets hope it’s sooner this time around and not another Afghanistan or should I say another Haiti.

Chemtrails are bad news. They contain barium and aluminum, which have the potential to destroy ecosystems around the world. But what if this destruction is merely an inevitable and acceptable consequence of a much larger program? A program intended to be part of an all-in-one solution to global control and manipulation?

What is the purpose of HAARP? To understand this, we can look to information in the patent:

This invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential future developments. As alluded to earlier, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection, or confusion could result, particularly when relativistic particles are employed. Also, large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection of same.

Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles, which will act as a lens or focusing device.

Also as alluded to earlier, molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased. Similarly, environmental enhancement could be achieved by causing the breakup of various chemical entities such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrous oxides, and the like.

Transportation of entities can also be realized when advantage is taken of the drag effects caused by regions of the atmosphere moving up along diverging field lines. Small micron sized particles can be then transported, and, under certain circumstances and with the availability of sufficient energy, larger particles or objects could be similarly affected. Particles with desired characteristics such as tackiness, reflectivity, absorptivity, etc., can be transported for specific purposes or effects. For example, a plume of tacky particles could be established to increase the drag on a missile or satellite passing therethrough. Even plumes of plasma having substantially less charged particle density than described above will produce drag effects on missiles which will affect a lightweight (dummy) missile in a manner substantially different than a heavy (live) missile and this affect can be used to distinguish between the two types of missiles.

A moving plume could also serve as a means for supplying a space station or for focusing vast amount of sunlight on selected portions of the earth.

Surveys of global scope could also be realized because the earth’s natural magnetic field could be significantly altered in a controlled manner by plasma beta effects resulting in, for example,improved magnetotelluric surveys.

Electromagnetic pulse defenses are also possible. The earth’s magnetic field could be decreased or disrupted at appropriate altitudes to modify or eliminate the magnetic field in high Compton electron generation (e.g., from high altitude nuclear bursts) regions. High intensity, well controlled electrical fields can be provided in selected locations for various purposes. For example, the plasma sheath surrounding a missile or satellite could be used as a trigger for activating such a high intensity field to destroy the missile or satellite.

Further, irregularities can be created in the ionosphere which will interfere with the normal operation of various types of radar, e.g., synthetic aperture radar.

The present invention can also be used to create artificial belts of trapped particles which in turn can be studied to determine the stability of such parties.

Still further, plumes in accordance with the present invention can be formed to simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by the detonation of a “heave” type nuclear device without actually having to detonate such a device. Thus it can be seen that the ramifications are numerous, far-reaching, and exceedingly varied in usefulness.

Create high intensity, well controlled electrical fields in selected locations for various purposes

Create irregularities in the ionosphere, which will interfere with the normal operation of various types of radar, e.g., synthetic aperture radar

Create plumes to simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by the detonation of a “heave” type nuclear device without actually having to detonate such a device. source

Does any of this send chills up your spine? Well, it should. But this did not start with the HAARP patent. Ten years earlier, a patent was obtained which contained a “method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes.”

There is disclosed method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in ionospheric characteristics of the earth and measuring certain selected characteristics of the earth. Substantial energetic particle precipitation is triggered through injection of low energy ionized gas, such as hydrogen, in the region of large fluxes of energetic particles in or near the magnetic equator. The loss process is known to occur naturally but a triggered change is achieved through injection of larger amounts of low-energy ionized gas than are naturally present, preferably in the cusp region, which usually extends inside the synchronous orbit for several hours about local midnight.

With this information in hand, the inventor of HAARP was ready to reveal technology that contains one of the most dastardly plans for global manipulation possible – selective weather modification.

HAARP is utilized for many clandestine missions, of which weather modification is a fundamental objective. Microwave, Extreme Low Frequency (ELF), Very Low Frequency (VLF) and other EMR/EMF-based systems are transmitted into the atmosphere and reflected by the ionosphere back through the Earth’s Stratosphere/Atmosphere where various airborne chemical particulates, polymer filaments and other electromagnetic frequency absorbers and reflectors are used to push or pull the prevailing jet-streams to alter weather patterns. In many instances, drought inducement technologies have been found in patented systems. Drought inducement occurs, according to reviewed technologies, by heating the stratosphere with microwaves, placing airborne chemical particulates in the airspace and thereby changing the base-line moisture gradients via microwaves from HAARP and desiccating regions chemically with barium titanates, methyl aluminum and potassium mixtures.

In a nutshell:

Jets spray chemtrails consisting of barium titanates, methyl aluminum and potassium mixtures in the stratosphere. These chemtrails are used to reflect and absorb radio and electromagnetic frequencies that are induced by HAARP, and reflected back from the ionosphere. This activity is used to push or pull jet streams, which alter weather patterns. This manipulation can result in all sorts of different weather patterns, including storms, drought, extreme cold, heat, etc.

In the late 1950’s, it was discovered that naturally occurring belts exist at high altitudes above the earth’s surface, and it is now established that these belts result from charged electrons and ions becoming trapped along the magnetic lines of force (field lines) of the earth’s essentially dipole magnetic field. The trapped electrons and ions are confined along the field lines between two magnetic mirrors, which exist at spaced apart points along those field lines. The trapped electrons and ions move in helical paths around their particular field lines and “bounce” back and forth between the magnetic mirrors. These trapped electrons and ions can oscillate along the field lines for long periods of time. (HAARP patent)

HAARP technology for weather modification, in conjunction with chemtrails, use the ionosphere and particulate matter in the stratosphere (chemtrails) to reflect energy back and forth in order to control jet streams, which in turn cause the desired weather patterns.

The global warming scam

So what to do? Well, like any good entrepreneur, you can take advantage of disaster capitalism to make a few bucks. Want to make a bit of money by creating a global warming scam? Spray a few chemtrails, melt a bit of ice, take a picture of a polar bear surrounded by water, and WALLA! a global warming crisis that can be used to manipulate the public into accepting a carbon tax for breathing. Or how about creating storms that wipe out cities that can be rebuilt in a more pleasing manner for the rich and powerful? You could wipe out local farming communities by creating drought in certain areas, declare a particular fish endangered, then take the farmers’ water in the name of ecology, and allow them to go bankrupt. The land could then be used for a more suitable purpose such as a wildlife preserve so that the rich and powerful can have a playground.

The possibilities are endless, and the cost? Well, the American people can pay for it with their tax dollars. The ramifications? What are a few billion deaths from chemical poisoning, starvation, malnutrition, and disease? Why, a much needed benefit, of course. After all, according to the Georgia Guidestones, the population needs to be reduced to 500 million in order to maintain the earth in the manner that the rich and powerful New World Order mafia would like it to be.

(C) 2010 Barbara H. Peterson

Conclusion

My Deep Concern about 2030

Okay, now we know that the U.N. and globalists worldwide have depended on HAARP to create climate change and severely affect the earth’s magnetic field. What do these mad scientists plan to happen on or right after 2030? Are we being set up for a global catastrophe?

Do we truly understand the power that is harnessed in HAARP? I believe that we have only seen the “Tip of the iceberg” (pun intended) of the capabilities of HAARP. If the U.S. and other nations who will not comply with the U.N. and implement the regulations which the U.N. is demanding – what is the fate of the earth when the powers that be give the order to unleash the full power of HAARP upon the earth?

The reader must understand that most of the people on the earth believe that mankind is responsible for these dramatic changes in weather and the earth’s magnetic field; and that HAARP is completely harmless and is just for “studying” the ionosphere.

I believe that the MSM is schooled by the powers that be (which own them) to laugh and disparage any person who even insinuates that HAARP is a dangerous weapon. They are told to label those who question this as fanatics and conspiracy theory nutjubs. I believe that these people would be hard pressed to call the “facts” which I have presented in this article “conspiratorial” or “hysterical.”

Brethren, I hope that this article has convinced you that HAARP is a weapon and is being used to create Climate change and now even the coming “flip” of the magnetic poles of the earth. HAARP can create weather, earthquakes, and they are inadvertently (or maybe purposely) causing holes in our ionosphere.

The People of Earth have been duped and the media once again is a vehicle by which misinformation is disseminated to the public.

Again, PLEASE print out this article. The information which I have supplied may be scrubbed from the Internet at any time.

Brethren, once again I remind the reader that God is in Full Control. He allowed HAARP and even CERN to be developed. He knew about these dangerous systems before the foundations of the earth were laid.

The natural man (unsaved) is quite ignorant. They have no understanding that God created the heavens and the earth; and He created them perfectly. If we were any closer to the sun, we would burn; any further – we would freeze. Our Creator God makes no mistakes.

4 thoughts on “Manmade Climate Change Caused by HAARP: NO CONSPIRACY-JUST THE FACTS”

I am so very thankful that you have so thoroughly covered this topic. Once again, Jesus said, “ Be not deceived.” The weather and wind we are now experiencing are unlike any we have ever had. We witness clear skies totally covered by chemicals and then covered in with masses of solid slate gray that last for days. There are hardly any “ normal” clouds anymore. Clear skies and stars are a rarity.
Our Canadian govt is so believinb the lie and our PM is pushing globalism to the max.
Every aspect of life is being or trying to be manipulated by man. Praise God, He, He alone is our Creator and He is in control! Maranatha