Astronomers claim that the Spitzer infrared telescope has found
distant black holes hiding behind dust clouds. More likely Spitzer
has found the standard signature of electric discharge in space.

We hear a lot
about the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR): Big
Bang astronomers proclaim that it proves the Ultimate Truth
of the Big Bang theory. But there’s also a cosmic x-ray
background radiation (CXBR) that in the Big Bang universe
can only come from black holes: No other object can
concentrate the weak gravitational force enough to produce
the quantity of x-rays observed. The problem has been that
there aren’t enough black holes to account for the observed
quantity.

Now the Spitzer
infrared telescope has found a lot of hot dust clouds, and
the Big Bang astronomers are seizing on the discovery as
proof that many black holes are hiding their optical light
behind the dust. Under the astronomers’ theoretical
assumptions concerning redshift (the stretching of light
toward red on the spectrum), they believe they know
the distance to the hot dust clouds. So it’s a simple
calculation to determine the energy output required to make
the dust appear as hot as Spitzer sees it: Voilà—all the
black holes astronomers need (if not more).

The trouble is
that these black-hole wanna-be’s are identified as quasars.
In the image above, blue and green spots represent Spitzer’s
observations at two infrared wavelengths, red spots
represent radio observations, and the yellow spot represents
an object radiating in both infrared and radio—the signature
of a quasar. But quasars are observationally and
statistically linked to relatively
nearby galaxies.
This means that astronomers have been deceived by the
quasars’ redshifts. They have assumed that redshift is an
indicator of distance, despite the admonition from a growing
number of critics that the quasars’ redshifts are largely
intrinsic to the objects themselves. If the quasars are not
at the farthest reaches of the universe, their energy output
is
much less than the
math indicates, so much less that they can’t be black holes.
And the Big Bang again can’t account for the CXBR.

Plasma cosmology
easily steps over this line in the sand over which the Big
Bang stumbles. Electrical
double layers
associated with active galaxies and quasars generate copious
amounts of x-rays, and they do it “the easy way”, by
accelerating electrons through an electric field, just like
your dentist does. There are no black holes lurking in his
x-ray machine.

Double layers
also emit a lot of microwave and radio radiation. They don’t
need to be hot to do it (although they can be). They don’t
need to squeeze a lot of matter into the mathematical
abstraction of a black hole to do it. They merely radiate
some of the electrical energy coursing through the circuit
that lights up the parent active galaxy and the
next-generation quasar.
___________________________________________________________________________

Authors David Talbott and Wallace
Thornhill introduce the reader to an age of planetary instability
and earthshaking electrical events in ancient times. If their
hypothesis is correct, it could not fail to alter many paths of
scientific investigation.

Professor
of engineering Donald Scott systematically unravels the myths of the
"Big Bang" cosmology, and he does so without resorting to black
holes, dark matter, dark energy, neutron stars, magnetic
"reconnection", or any other fictions needed to prop up a failed
theory.

In
language designed for scientists and non-scientists alike, authors
Wallace Thornhill and David Talbott show that even the greatest
surprises of the space age are predictable patterns in an electric
universe.