Trump Says “You’re Fired” to Republicans

It should come as no surprise that President Donald Trump is in outright warfare with the leaders of the Republican Party. He never was a real Republican.

Way back in 2016 when he was running in the primaries, I wrote as reason to not vote for him in the GOP primary:

“He has an identity problem: He was a Democrat from 2001-2009 and before 1987; a Reform Party candidate from 1999-2001; an Independent from 2011-2012; and Republican from 2012 to the present, 2009-2011 and 1987 to 1999. That’s six switches.”

In short, Donald Trump always was and always will be undefined. He is a man of the moment. He is reactive rather than proactive. He knows what he is against — much of what his predecessors put in place. He rescinds; he doesn’t originate. He is a maverick. He is unaligned. He has no loyalties to a creed, a philosophy or the people around him who stand for a consistent point of view. He is a political entrepreneur, always ready for the next political pivot.

So what else to make of him?

Some pundits are labeling him as an independent. That doesn’t work for me. Most independents I know have abiding mix of positions; their views just don’t line up with either of the two parties. Typical is a citizen who is fiscally conservative but flexible on social issues.

To label Trump an independent misses the essence of the man. In reality, no political labels apply,

Foremost, he is an entertainer. He relies on new chapters in his soap opera to hold his audience. That explains his regular use of the line — “You’re fired!” — to members of his White House staff.

Among the casualties was Reince Priebus, former head of the Wisconsin and national Republican Party. This is the guy who gave candidate Trump the ground game to win the general election. Priebus is an operative, but he believed in what the GOP was selling. If you fire the former head of the party as chief of staff, are you a Republican?

Trump has made it clear in recent weeks that he would love to fire just about all the Republican leaders in Congress (Speaker Ryan, Sens. McConnell, McCain, Corker, Graham, Flake). But he is slowly learning that they don’t report to him; they report to their constituents.

Unlike despots in other countries, he can’t fire them. With great foresight, our founders built in checks and balances, so the legislature and judiciary are independent of the White House. That separation of powers must be very frustrating for a president like Trump, who likes to govern by executive order.

On the entertainment front, the president obsesses about the journalists he professes to despise. Their coverage is catnip for him. Most leaders have a mission in mind and forge ahead with their agendas regardless of the critics in the cheap seats. This guy cares more about the commentary than the substance.

He is into ratings, polls and crowd sizes at his unending campaign events. (Note to Mr. Trump: the campaign is over). He did with as a TV personality in the ratings. What he doesn’t get is that ratings assess what people watch, not what they think about your effectiveness. Entertainment is a diversion from life, not real life.

He invariably sees his crowds as bigger than they really were and opposing groups as smaller than they were.

I wake up every morning and close every day wondering what surprise the President riffed off the night before or during the work day. The Tweets are always there. Fascinating to watch, but disheartening on the serious side of life. But I am sure his TV ratings remain high, which explains in part why he gets so much coverage.

At the same time, his polling numbers continue to fall in large swaths of the electorate. The polls measure not his showmanship, but his presidential performance.

On those metrics, this man who claims to be a winner is a proving to be a loser. In a recent poll, he was at exceptionally low in approval ratings with women (23%), college grads (24%) and votes under 45 (29%).

Even chunks of his “base” are eroding, such as men (41%), voters over 45 (37%) and whites without college degrees (38%). That’s the group that will stick the longest with Trump. They show up at his rallies. They will deny the erosion, claiming a not-so-silent majority still exists. But his fall from grace is not fake news.

It seems like Donald Trump has been in office for a decade. Like him or not, he generates sensory overload, even when he is on vacation.

Meanwhile, all of us who are along for the ride should give up trying to label him. He defies any brand.

As for the Republican Party, it’s going to have to figure out how to unwind a bad marriage.

3 thoughts on “Op Ed: Trump Says “You’re Fired” to Republicans”

John, your fourth graph reminds me of Woody Allen in “Love and Death,” as he is about to assassinate Napoleon, he waves his pistol and shouts, “You’re a tyrant, and a dictator, and you start wars!” To which Napoleon asks, “Why is he reciting my credits?” The Right Bauer is down by the reflecting pond where he is live-blogging his reality series, POTUS. “We don’t need a leader!” the anarchists cry. Perfect. Hard to gain any speed in the DC Grand Prix, you just get to 4th gear as you reach the next hairpin curve. Not much fun to watch or drive. The conclusion of a useful analysis always gives a course of action. I give you Slartibartfast: “The chances of finding out what’s actually going on are so absurdly remote that the only thing to do is to say, “Hang the sense of it,” and keep yourself busy.”

Trump is a classic case of arrested development. He is a 12 year old bully who has never been knocked on his ass because of his size and wealth. As to his political allegiances, he is a steadfast member of the party of Trump and his platform is “me and mine, first,only, and always”. He demands loyalty but displays none. Trump is devoid of empathy or sympathy for anyone but himself. Psychologists have many labels for him, but in lay mans’ language he is a simply a miserable failure as a human being.In a radical capitalistic country like the United States has become, individuals like Trump unfortunately can do quite well.

I am likely to criticize Torinus’ pieces due to general disagreement and a dislike of narrow interpretation. However, I agree with much of what he writes here. I was about to leave disappointed, when I noticed the comment from Haering. It starts off well enough with a Woody Allen quote, but quickly declines into a whirlpool of obscurity and incoherence. For those of us who also occasionally seek attention, you might think this would be fine, yet it is painful to read and smells strongly of cheap brandy.