FROM

Do not make a truce with “humane” animal abuse.
Vegan is the only solution.

“The one good thing the ballot did was raise more awareness of animal
suffering, but the energy and time and money spent on welfare issues has got
to stop. This is such a glaring example of where it leads.”
— Cynthia Cruser, email to United Poultry Concerns on October 11, 2017,
regarding a slaughterhouse for cows, pigs, sheep and birds that is under
construction in Westport Massachusetts, where activists are peacefully
protesting.

UPC says:

Many animal activists are uncomfortable with farmed animal “welfare”
initiatives because of their tendency to suggest that an acceptable
alternative to “factory farming” is “ethically-sourced,” “locally-sourced,”
“humanely-raised,” or “responsibly caught” animals. This approach to
gathering support for an animal welfare initiative seeks ominously to
sweeten the pot by offering the public a compensatory group of animals as
bait for their support for an “anti-factory-farming” initiative. People are
tacitly or overtly given permission to hurt this group of animals
(“humanely-raised”), if only they will leave that other group
(“factory-farmed” animals) alone.

The fact is that all animal farming is factory-farming, a business like
any other – only the precursors of the final products, instead of being
inanimate, are conscious beings like ourselves. What’s happening now, in the
factory farming versus “humane” farming rivalry, is a version of George
Orwell’s parable, in 1984, of how the revolutionary Brotherhood
rises up to challenge Big Brother, only to become indistinguishable from its
evil “opposite.” Turns out there is no real rivalry between them, because
they are, at bottom, cut from the same cloth.

Animal rights activist, Cynthia Cruser, explained to UPC this month that
the Massachusetts ballot, in 2016, “passed by a wide margin in favor of the
animals. I don't think one person I talked to did not want to sign it, so it
didn't surprise me. One man said he hadn't voted for years but he was going
to go out and vote for the animals, and another young girl, who said she had
never registered to vote because she didn't think it was worth it, said she
was going to register so she could ‘vote for the animals.’ The Ultimate
Betrayal is sickeningly true for these animals, but it is also true of the
people who love animals in their hearts and are led to believe that somehow
someone is on watch making things okay. Time to end the sabotage.”

Cynthia’s Letter, “Show compassion, and reject new Westport
slaughterhouse,” was published in The Herald News on October 10, 2017:

Letter to the Editor:

Show compassion, and reject new Westport slaughterhouse

A few years ago I helped gather signatures for a ballot initiative in
Massachusetts. It prohibited animal products from being sold in the state if
the animals had been kept in “extreme confinement” situations. The
initiative eventually passed, easily. I love animals. It makes no sense to
me to love a kitten and eat a little lamb or a piglet. So of course I don’t
want to see them suffer in any way, and clearly neither do a large majority
of the residents of Massachusetts.

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics — the world’s largest organization of
nutrition professionals — states that, when appropriately planned, vegan
diets (diets containing no animal products) are “healthful, nutritionally
adequate, and may provide health benefits for the prevention and treatment
of certain diseases.” It further says that a vegan diet is appropriate for
all stages of life including in pregnancy and for athletes.

The Herald News reported on Sept. 12 that there is a new slaughterhouse
under construction on State Road in Westport. If this killing of animals, in
fact, is unnecessary, then it follows that it is inhumane and morally wrong.

Carnism, a term defined by Melanie Joy, professor of psychology and
sociology at the University of Massachusetts, is a lifestyle that revolves
around the domination and consumption of animals and their excretions. This
slaughterhouse will add to carnists’ convenience and enjoyment.

If the residents of Massachusetts really care about animals, I ask them to
consider the fact that cows, pigs, sheep and chickens — the beautiful,
sentient creatures to be “processed” in Westport — are individuals with
lives of value, worthy of our respect and love. They are not commodities to
be owned and killed at our whim. Because we think something is traditional
or natural does not make it morally right.

Let’s not drive by these animals on the way to their death, as our children
sit beside us in the car. Instead let’s show our children what compassion
and empathy look like.

Fair Use Notice: This document, and others on our web site, may contain copyrighted
material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners.
We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use
of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).
If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use,
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.