The 4000 BCE Origins of Child Abuse,
Sex-repression, Warfare and Social Violence,
In the Deserts of the Old World

Evidence for a Worldwide,
Climate-Linked Geographical Pattern
in Human Behavior

James DeMeo, PhD

If you like big data, then consider "It employed standard cross-cultural correlation tables on over 60 different variables, plus geographical mapping and quadruple blind research procedures to insure objectivity, and all the basic starting assumptions are clearly elucidated in advance."

You certainly don't have to have a top secret clearance to know what's been happening for the last 6000 years. Radiating waves of misery.

If you like big data, then consider "It employed standard cross-cultural correlation tables on over 60 different variables, plus geographical mapping and quadruple blind research procedures to insure objectivity, and all the basic starting assumptions are clearly elucidated in advance."

You certainly don't have to have a top secret clearance to know what's been happening for the last 6000 years. Radiating waves of misery.

Is Demeo the latest stand-up comedian? Do you actually believe that you could possibly quantify such a thing? He's a moron.Arguing how many angels that can dance on the head of a pin.
You do need a top-secret security clearance to know what's really behind 'officialdom.'
Carbon dioxide from forest fires and volcanoes is nothing compared to anthropogenic emissions.

Forest fires happen every year, and if left alone the same amount of carbon gets trapped by trees growing in clearances caused by fires in the previous years. So in essence forest fires do not add to the carbon in the atmosphere.

Unless the fires are used to clear land for other purposes, as sadly happens on a large scale. Then the land won't recapture the same amount of carbon in the coming years.
But that carbon addition is caused by human activity and should be accounted as such.

So if half the forest fires are to clear land, 4B of CO2 should be added to the 45B tally for human activuity, and the other 4B can be wiped as it is compensated by reforestation.

Poor leadership concerns 26% of people most.
But I wouldn't say that problem is 6.5 times as bad or as important as the effects of man-made climate change.

People react to what they see and hear all the time on the media. Climate change gets relatively low coverage.
So the poll only measures news coverage, not what the people think, or at least not what people would think if they weren't subjected to highly biased news coverage.