David Axelrod appeared on This Week and acknowledged that the Administration has little chance of getting anything beyond an extension of unemployment benefits through Congress between now and the election. That extension would appear to have 60 votes whenever Robert Byrd’s replacement gets into the Senate. But that jobs bill that had all the tax extensions and infrastructure funding and summer job money? Forget it. Aid to state Medicaid programs? Isn’t going to happen. Extending the COBRA subsidy to keep the jobless covered? Nope.

In his February budget proposal, the president requested $266 billion for additional stimulus for the economy. And just a month ago, the President called for $50 billion in emergency aid to states alongside the extension of unemployment benefits. This morning Axelrod called again for extension of unemployment benefits, but aid to states was not on his list.

“It’s true that there is not a great desire” on Capitol Hill to spend more money, Axelrod said, “even though there is some argument for additional spending in the short-run to continue to generate economic activity.”

“There’s not a great appetite for it, but I do think we can get additional tax relief for small businesses – that’s what we want to do – additional lending for small businesses,” the President’s senior advisor said.

This comes at a curious time, when other members of the Administration, including the President, are pushing certain stimulative activities. Obama called for $5 billion in clean energy tax credits to create 40,000 jobs in Nevada this week. Education Secretary Arne Duncan stressed the urgency of the education jobs funding to save at least 140,000 teachers from layoffs, a measure the Administration threatened to veto because it was paid for in part with a sliver of Race to the Top money. (Duncan said that Congress would have to “find a way” to pay for the teacher fund. They already have!)

But Axelrod, according to published reports, has been out front in stressing spending reductions in internal meetings with the President, believing that the public has shown concern about deficits. So his fallback to small business measures and wiping stimulus off the table should come as no surprise.

However, as Duncan Black says, there’s more than one way to make that shift, especially if the economic team understands the importance of more stimulus to support the economy.

So let’s say Obama’s people have correctly deduced that there’s no chance in hell of getting anything through Congress. They have two basic options. First, they could get on the teevee every day and say, “This is my plan to help. Republicans in Congress won’t pass it.” They could hold rallies in Maine. Allies could run ads. At least people would know who is for and who is against…and just what it was that people are for or against.

Option two is back off proposals you’ve previously made and have Axelrod get on the teevee and say, “there is some argument for additional spending in the short-run to continue to generate economic activity.”

Surely the lead political strategist in the White House recognizes the political importance of assigning blame?

Duncan Black misses the better third option. Have Senate Democrats say they are determined to help people and if Republicans don’t stop obstructing they will pull the nuclear option and be down with filibuster in the course of 20 minutes.

If you give a man a fish you will feed him for a day. If you give the man access to the lake they have the power to support themselves without coming to you. Think about that. We need unemployment extensions, yes. But that’s the immediate problem. Wake up people they are restructuring who we are and the power of the rich.

IT is nothing more than good cop bad cop working for the same corporate masters. It’s time to pass off to REpubs because the Dems can’t justify serving the corporations to the degree they already have. Time to look like it’s our of their hands. Kubuki Theater for droolers.

Like the discussion of long-term debt vs. short-term economic stimulus you say ‘history’ (long-term) will be unkind, but the Obama administration and most people in positions of government or business believe it is the PRESENT which is being unkind and it is this which must be conquered before we have to worry about any kind of history.

But then, those who have aren’t worried about either are they?

Go back to Bush-era policies and the bust or go forward with Obama’s policies and some hope of success.

Wrong! There is NO hope with this current administrations agenda. November can’t come fast enough and 2012 is unfortunately very far in the future. Liberalism is a disease that must be excised like the cancer that it is. We don’t have to go back to bush but we sure as hell can’t afford as a nation even one more day of this socialist agenda.