I'm thinkin' 5-12-16-15-21-4-11 PL. Not enough ST for a WS, could maybe go PS but his size is taking away from points already. Another option is 7-12-16-17-17-4-11 then raise ST to 9, or some kind of burner, 8-12-16-14-20-4-10 or something along those lines. I'd just as soon go with the first design and raise WT if I'm gonna do that.

I'm thinkin' 5-12-16-15-21-4-11 PL. Not enough ST for a WS, could maybe go PS but his size is taking away from points already. Another option is 7-12-16-17-17-4-11 then raise ST to 9, or some kind of burner, 8-12-16-14-20-4-10 or something along those lines. I'd just as soon go with the first design and raise WT if I'm gonna do that.

I'm thinkin' 5-12-16-15-21-4-11 PL. Not enough ST for a WS, could maybe go PS but his size is taking away from points already. Another option is 7-12-16-17-17-4-11 then raise ST to 9, or some kind of burner, 8-12-16-14-20-4-10 or something along those lines. I'd just as soon go with the first design and raise WT if I'm gonna do that.

My thoughts are take the 17/21

7-12-16-17-21-4-7 LU

I am in agreement it has good bases, 11/2/12/1/5/8, and it should be fairly easy to train up to the SS and a remote shot at Tremendous damage at 9 ST. Hopefully it will pick up RIP at a fairly good pace to make up for that lacking area but it has enough INI to hopefully take the offensive if it gets jumped. You will also be able to see +4 ATT if it starts Ex and +2 or more DEF if it gets Incredibly Quick. There's also a quick RIP and DEF skill, if you don't mind a few burnt skills at 5 SP.

_________________A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

Thomas Jefferson

The ConsortiumArchMaster Poster

Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 9509
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting

Posted:
Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:01 am

gentleben wrote:

_Buri_ wrote:

5-12-16-11-16-4-6:

I'm thinkin' 5-12-16-15-21-4-11 PL. Not enough ST for a WS, could maybe go PS but his size is taking away from points already. Another option is 7-12-16-17-17-4-11 then raise ST to 9, or some kind of burner, 8-12-16-14-20-4-10 or something along those lines. I'd just as soon go with the first design and raise WT if I'm gonna do that.

My thoughts are take the 17/21

7-12-16-17-21-4-7 LU

The 7-12-16-17-21-4-7 is what we'd do.
The LU is the most probable design, but we just might make it a ST.

I'm thinkin' 5-12-16-15-21-4-11 PL. Not enough ST for a WS, could maybe go PS but his size is taking away from points already. Another option is 7-12-16-17-17-4-11 then raise ST to 9, or some kind of burner, 8-12-16-14-20-4-10 or something along those lines. I'd just as soon go with the first design and raise WT if I'm gonna do that.

My thoughts are take the 17/21

7-12-16-17-21-4-7 LU

The 7-12-16-17-21-4-7 is what we'd do.
The LU is the most probable design, but we just might make it a ST.

You got me thinking WS doesn't look that bad and with 2 ST trains you get BS slightly unsuited, and you might get decent damage and play with the WF.

Decent PAR good ATT and INI and is deceptively quick with 7 DEC - and the 17 WT. If it learns right look out! Maybe even a Hatchet carrying SL (12/2/10/-1/3/8 )

_________________A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by Street_Legal on Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:26 pm; edited 2 times in total

AssurnasirbanipalArchMaster Poster

Joined: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 1682
Location: San Jose, CA

Posted:
Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:23 am

Looks like a burner/bust out warrior to me, since I can't get what I 'want' out of this guy:

6-12-16-16-20-4-10 or 8-12-16-14-20-4-10

TerminatorArchMaster Poster

Joined: Jul 18, 2006
Posts: 1168

Posted:
Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:29 am

This screams hatchet wielding 7-12-16-17-21-4-7 ST or SL to me. I had a ST very close to this graduate at something like 20-11-3 not too long ago.

_________________We don't get mad, we get even!

Vanek, Manager of the Warmasters (DM-81)

KidArcaneGrandmaster Poster

Joined: Apr 26, 2003
Posts: 674
Location: San Antonio, TX

Posted:
Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:29 pm

Too much con and will to die quickly or easily; not enough strength or dexterity for my taste. Probably a long, generally losing, career.

Dark Arena and hope for something better.

_________________"Don't make me destroy you." -- Darth Vader

One Armed BanditArchMaster Poster

Joined: Apr 15, 2004
Posts: 2789

Posted:
Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:21 pm

The best I can come up with:

5-12-16-11-16-4-6 --> 11-12-16-17-17-4-7 WS

A fine looking arena warrior, but a poor tournament warrior.

Street_LegalArchMaster Poster

Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Posts: 3535
Location: The Big D (etroit) area

Posted:
Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:06 pm

KidArcane wrote:

Too much con and will to die quickly or easily; not enough strength or dexterity for my taste. Probably a long, generally losing, career.

Dark Arena and hope for something better.

What the Fast? Who turned you to the jaded side already? I bet it was that dastardly manager named Manager! This is at least a fine LU, maybe not great but any 17/21 warrior is hardly DA material!

Wayne who do you think jaded this fine young man? Does it seem to be the work of Dwayne to you?

In all seriousness Kid Arcane I don't want you to think just because we differ in opinions that I think there's a single thing wrong with you in my mind, heck in all likelihood you could be a better manager than I!

_________________A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

Thomas Jefferson

_Buri_ArchMaster Poster

Joined: Nov 07, 2010
Posts: 1002
Location: Asgard

Posted:
Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:50 am

As you guys know, I'll DA a LOT of rollups, especially on my tourney teams, I DA 17 WTs all the time. Not if I think it can win, however... this is an arena fighter, and so I went with the 7-12-16-17-21-4-7 SL. I like the idea of using something other than a SH, and I have already graduated a similar LU out of the same arena. It will come up good or better damage, can take a lot of damage, and good endurance. Should be a killer!

I'm thinkin' 5-12-16-15-21-4-11 PL. Not enough ST for a WS, could maybe go PS but his size is taking away from points already. Another option is 7-12-16-17-17-4-11 then raise ST to 9, or some kind of burner, 8-12-16-14-20-4-10 or something along those lines. I'd just as soon go with the first design and raise WT if I'm gonna do that.

BTW 11 WT with that ability to take damage and having a 10 attack is a very nice combo. He will still learn. I have found that the difference in skill learns between 11 and 13 to be almost negligible. Obviously you learn a tad more with 13 but not enough for me not to use the positives of leaving it at 11 and getting the takes tremendous and other benefits.