Traditionally, DNA evidence in kits were tested in order to identify or confirm the identity of suspects in individual cases of sexual violence, or to identify or confirm the identity of suspects across multiple cases in specific situations (for example, if a serial offender was suspected). In addition, DNA evidence may also have been tested to corroborate or confirm other evidence, such as a victim statement or crime scene evidence. When eligible, the DNA profiles obtained in this testing process would be uploaded to the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System, where they could be helpful in matching an offender to other previous or future cases.

However, testing was not performed, for example, in cases where a suspect was identified through better evidence than the kit, such as a confession or evidence collected from the crime scene (this could include DNA evidence), or where corroboration or confirmation of other evidence by testing the kit was not considered necessary. Testing was also not performed in cases where a survivor declined to participate in the case for various reasons.

Historically, testing of kits was further limited by technological, staffing, and funding limitations, and the need to share testing resources with other types of crime cases such as murders.

It is possible to test more kits than it was in the past, with the development of better DNA testing technology and best practices for addressing stored untested kits based on large scale, federally funded studies; the expanded availability of laboratory capacity and funding from both federal and state sources; and a national shift in how sexual violence is addressed.

In the investigation and prosecution of sexual violence crimes, the needs of the reporting survivor must take priority in order to ensure that they are able to come forward and report these crimes without fearing additional, unnecessary trauma. Sometimes survivors may report a sexual assault, but decide against pursuing the case further. This is an important exercise of their rights and should be respected.

Therefore, in a case where a kit was collected and a police report was made but later formally withdrawn, the kit will not automatically be tested. This respects the right of the survivor to decide whether or not to participate in the criminal justice process.

In addition, kits will not be automatically tested in cases where the offender has been found guilty of a felony. The reason for this is that in such cases, felony conviction results in the collection of DNA from the offenders which are uploaded to the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System and are already available for comparison across cases and jurisdictions.

It is important to note that some kits were disposed of in the past due to normal evidence storage and disposal practices. However, if police have retained a kit in storage and it is not going to be automatically tested in the Project Mālama Kākou process, it can still be tested at the survivor’s request.

Survivors who formally withdrew their complaint and would like to have their kit tested, or who would like to discuss possibly reinstating their previous report, are encouraged to contact Project Mālama Kākou to discuss the current status of their kit:

If a survivor had an evidence kit collected in their case but did not make a report to the police, the kit may have been retained in storage, either by the sexual assault center program that performed the forensic medical examination service or by the police.

At a survivor’s request, a report of a sexual assault related to those kits may still be made to the police and the kit, if it was retained in storage, may still be submitted for testing.

Survivors who had a kit collected but did not make a report to the police, and who may be interested in making a police report at this time, can contact Project Mālama Kākou to discuss the current status of their kit: