If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Bush Administration Impeachment Push! (Everyone Must View!)

Akamu's Shakedown: (FINALLY SOMETHING!) Very important news! Today (07/25/08) Republican Senator, Dennis Kucinich of Ohio will present the 35 articles of impeachment against: (There is A LOT more then 35 but that is what he is presenting)

Today will be the first case to be presented to congress against the Bush Administration. The MEDIA is trying to ignore this and does not want to air or report on it!

It's extremely noticeable that Bush, Cheney and the entire Bush Administration have committed a ridiculous amount of crimes against the American people. Senator Dennis Kucinich is risking his life and his job to present these articles of impeachment for every single American in this country, I thank Dennis Kucinich and pray for his life.

The Hidden Government is pushing HARD for war with Iran, and a lot of people do not even have a clue. This is insanity. Understand this...they will do anything they can do to debunk, toss up a non-impeachment as a counter, lie, rig, or even kill this man! This guy is brave! Another thing...other people, MANY people are setting up to take the Bush Administration down, with documented evidence, e-mails and etc. (PROOF) to put Bush in jail. A lot more people are involved but whatever they can get done would be something.

Why impeach Bush now when he is about to leave office?

/_1_) The reason is because Bush and the people that control Bush (Globalist) want to attack Iran, and they want to plan another terrorist attack on the American people SOON! Also to possible bring MARTIAL LAW TO THIS COUNTRY! People who give a FU*K about this country are trying to stop this! Maybe if we impeach Bush it might help to stop the war with Iran.

/_2_) Now Iran is a much larger country with more people and if we DARE attack Iran it can result into World War 3. Iran has ties with China, and Russia to name the bigger countries doing business with them and that could offset them to do something to us.

/_3_) The Bush Administration stated, IF IRAN ATTACKED IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM THEY WILL USE NUCLEAR FORCE! The US Government is going to FORCE IRAN into war with us either through Israeli OR some other form orchestrated by the US government.

/_4_) Ask yourself this, why have the richest people in Israeli and some even in our country (United States) have moved to other places? Because THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN!

/_5_) Iran has done nothing and they are doing everything in their power not to get into War. Iranian PresidentMahmoud Ahmadinejad stated that there will be no war. (We better hope not!)/_6_) Iran was trying to sue the US because The US government keeps trying to find ways to go to war with Iran, they keep trying to pick a fight.

==============================================

Dennis Kucinich Thanks the people for support!:

If the US bombs iran, you get drafted:

The 35 articles of Impeachment introduced to congress:

Articles of Impeachment for Bush (Part 1):

Articles of Impeachment for Bush (Part 2):

Articles of Impeachment for Bush (Part 3):

Articles of Impeachment for Bush (Part 4):

Articles of Impeachment for Bush (Part 5):

[UPDATED! 7-25-2008 Follow up]:

Dennis Kucinich - 7-25-2008:

7/25/08 #35 Nadler 'Misrepresentation of Impeachment":

Dennis did well, and the hearing was kinda shaky at times, you had people defending Bush and saying it's not a big deal that the president broke laws, wow how much money did he get paid to shove his face in Bushes azz?

There is many more videos from the hearing, if you would like to see them all go to this youtube channel to check 'em out: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Excellent thread. I've watched debates of Dennis Kucinich, and he's one of the few politicians out there that at least doesn't seem corrupt. A lot of what he says makes sense, and it doesn't sound like if he's trying to manipulate the public. Ron Paul is similar to Kucinich, and that's why it would have been better if he had won the Republican nomination, instead of John McCain(one of the most full of s#!t politicians out there). George W. Bush is a criminal, hands down. The 1.1 million Iraqis that died and the 4,000 Americans that died are proof. I know Bush's term is almost up, but I would love to see George Bush get impeached and put on the top 5 worst U.S. Presidents of all time list.

The reason why the United States is thinking about going to war with Iran is, because Israel has problems with Iran, and the United States and Israel are allies. It's also because Iran, like Iraq, has oil. The United States is desperately trying to lower the cost of oil, and the corporations are desperately trying to make more money, so they want to rape all oil rich countries of their resources. The only oil rich country that the United States won't try to attack is Saudi Arabia, because they have 25&#37; of the world's oil. They don't want to risk losing business with them, but they'll take their chances on countries that the they feel are weaker. Unfortunately, Barack Obama has not said that he's against going into Iran, even when he's been asked this question, so there's a chance that he'll go to war in Iran. John McCain said that he'll do whatever it takes to win the war in Iraq, so you already know he's just crazy about wars.

I am actually listening right now to a podcast of Dennis Kucinich on the Gary Null Show (7/23/2008). I love Dennis he is my hero! I wish I could have voted for him only 17 and he dropped out before the New York primary.

This dude is a republican? Looks like he's supporting Democrats more than anything...if he can prove his information then it wont be ignored by the media this news would be too much to ignore. I'm gonna watch the news to see if this comes up. If Bush did have a plan to get oil and that was the only reason for Iraq then he's gonna get screwed. I give him props for the protection we have had against enemy countries that we havent been attacked since 9/11. The Oil and Iraq thing have been his main problems. But if Bush can show more proof in the future that he is making Iraq a better country Democratically, then he wont be looked at as bad. And if for example this guy does prove Bush did all this just for Oil than Bush will have to show as much proof as he can to show Iraq has been a slow but steady proccess of success over the years. If Bush cant prove any positives with Iraq then an Impeachment would be on a rise. But this guy might be ignored so two possibilites here.

This dude is a republican? Looks like he's supporting Democrats more than anything...if he can prove his information then it wont be ignored by the media this news would be too much to ignore.I'm gonna watch the news to see if this comes up. If Bush did have a plan to get oil and that was the only reason for Iraq then he's gonna get screwed. I give him props for the protection we have had against enemy countries that we havent been attacked since 9/11. The Oil and Iraq thing have been his main problems. But if Bush can show more proof in the future that he is making Iraq a better country Democratically, then he wont be looked at as bad. And if for example this guy does prove Bush did all this just for Oil than Bush will have to show as much proof as he can to show Iraq has been a slow but steady proccess of success over the years. If Bush cant prove any positives with Iraq then an Impeachment would be on a rise. But this
guy might be ignored so two possibilites here.

How blind are you Paul?

Listen son, this is not about republican vs democrat, toss that shyt out the window, this is about America IN GENERAL, he is trying to DIVERT the US from FURTHER DISASTER.

The MEDIA is CONTROLLED by PEOPLE WITH MONEY, higher influence, which CONNECTS them to the scams and the Bush Administration, THEY DO NOT WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW THIS, or to give it anymore popularity.

Stop! JUST PLEASE STOP giving this moron props when you have no idea what you are talking about, or who you are admiring. Trust me I use to think he was doing good for this country until I did my homework. You are also wrong about us not getting attacked after 9/11, anthrax among other things were brought out by the US Government against the American people! The 4th Amendment is pretty much GONE! This is a tyrannical government.

I supported Bush for YEARS until I found out about everything he has done, is doing and WHO is controlling him, HE WILL NEVER BE LOOKED ON AS A GOOD PRESIDENT unless your brain is malfunctioning!

Might be ignored? he has been STRUGGLING to get noticed he has been ignored for a very long time and the only.....THE ONLY REASON HE GOT TO WHERE HE IS NOW IS BECAUSE PEOPLE OPENED THEIR MOUTH AND DEMANDED THAT CONGRESS RECOGNIZE HIM!

I seriously think they might kill him for doing this, or bring war with Iran sooner ..or many other hectic possibilities for our country!

This dude is a republican? Looks like he's supporting Democrats more than anything...if he can prove his information then it wont be ignored by the media this news would be too much to ignore. I'm gonna watch the news to see if this comes up. If Bush did have a plan to get oil and that was the only reason for Iraq then he's gonna get screwed. I give him props for the protection we have had against enemy countries that we havent been attacked since 9/11. The Oil and Iraq thing have been his main problems. But if Bush can show more proof in the future that he is making Iraq a better country Democratically, then he wont be looked at as bad. And if for example this guy does prove Bush did all this just for Oil than Bush will have to show as much proof as he can to show Iraq has been a slow but steady proccess of success over the years. If Bush cant prove any positives with Iraq then an Impeachment would be on a rise. But this guy might be ignored so two possibilites here.

Why do you support George W. Bush? You do know that in a recent poll, he was found to have a 19&#37; approval rating, don't you?

Here's the link: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

The attack on September 11 was not by the Iraqis, so I don't know how you could give George Bush credit for the United States not getting attacked.

The people that bombed the WTC were mostly from Saudi Arabia, and a few of them were from countries in Northern Africa. That was what the U.S. originally said. I'm going by what they originally said, because the media is full of people who twist the truth.

Here's the link: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

As you can see, none of the people accused of blowing up the World Trade Center are Iraqi.

I'm not lying when I say this. I was 11 years old, when the U.S. was attacked, and I knew that Iraq wasn't involved in 9/11, because it was said on the news that the people that hijacked the WTC were from other countries in the middle east, not Iraq. A lot of people got confused, though, because the United States kept changing their stories over and over again. First, we were attacked by people in Saudi Arabia and northern Africa. Then we were attacked by Afghanistan. Then we were attacked by Iraq. Then Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Now we're fighting a war on terror.
Do you honestly believe this propoganda?

It is a fact that the last time the U.S. was attacked on their land was in World War II. That's over 60 years ago. All of the wars after that were faught on other country's soil until September 11th. And even now, the Afghanis and Iraqis aren't fighting the U.S. on their territory. The U.S. is going to Iraq to kill them, and the U.S. has military bases in Afghanistan.

George Bush doesn't deserve any credit for protecting this country.
There are documents that prove that the United States knew there was going to be a terrorist attack, and Bush's cabinet did nothing to stop it.

Here's the link: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Akamu is right. Nobody should be supporting George W. Bush, because he's corrupt. I'm not just saying this. 81% of Americans that don't approve Bush are saying this.

Listen son, this is not about republican vs democrat, toss that shyt out the window, this is about America IN GENERAL, he is trying to DIVERT the US from FURTHER DISASTER.

The MEDIA is CONTROLLED by PEOPLE WITH MONEY, higher influence, which CONNECTS them to the scams and the Bush Administration, THEY DO NOT WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW THIS, or to give it anymore popularity.

Stop! JUST PLEASE STOP giving this moron props when you have no idea what you are talking about, or who you are admiring. Trust me I use to think he was doing good for this country until I did my homework. You are also wrong about us not getting attacked after 9/11, anthrax among other things were brought out by the US Government against the American people! The 4th Amendment is pretty much GONE! This is a tyrannical government.

I supported Bush for YEARS until I found out about everything he has done, is doing and WHO is controlling him, HE WILL NEVER BE LOOKED ON AS A GOOD PRESIDENT unless your brain is malfunctioning!

Might be ignored? he has been STRUGGLING to get noticed he has been ignored for a very long time and the only.....THE ONLY REASON HE GOT TO WHERE HE IS NOW IS BECAUSE PEOPLE OPENED THEIR MOUTH AND DEMANDED THAT CONGRESS RECOGNIZE HIM!

I seriously think they might kill him for doing this, or bring war with Iran sooner ..or many other hectic possibilities for our country!

I know some media sources sway to one person over another but to say EVERY media source goes to Bush's side and his administration? Akamu, you have some points in some of your views but to think that EVERYTHING about the media is corrupt is just nonesense there are many media sources including most of the national newspapers that hate Bush. They try to exploit him as best they can. If Bush had controll of all Media sources then no one would hate him, hence, he doesnt so the entire country basically hates him becuase of freedom of speech and everyone says what they want.

When i meant attacked I meant a disaster like 9/11 that completely turned our country upside down...anthrax didnt have an effect like 9/11 did. And this is not a tryraniccal goverment if it was Bush would be killing everyone...you sound like a radical, honestly. I'm not educated enough on politics to debate many people but i know that if you ever debated some good republican debators such as Sean Hannity or Mark Levine theyd disprove your remarks on the spot. Ill listen to what this guy has to say so that he's not ignored by me atleast. And about Bush i said THE ONLY WAY he can be looked at as a better president is IF he can show progress in Iraq that it will be a democratic coutry eventually...IF HE CANT then he will always be hated.

Why do you support George W. Bush? You do know that in a recent poll, he was found to have a 19% approval rating, don't you?

Here's the link: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

The attack on September 11 was not by the Iraqis, so I don't know how you could give George Bush credit for the United States not getting attacked.

The people that bombed the WTC were mostly from Saudi Arabia, and a few of them were from countries in Northern Africa. That was what the U.S. originally said. I'm going by what they originally said, because the media is full of people who twist the truth.

Here's the link: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

As you can see, none of the people accused of blowing up the World Trade Center are Iraqi.

I'm not lying when I say this. I was 11 years old, when the U.S. was attacked, and I knew that Iraq wasn't involved in 9/11, because it was said on the news that the people that hijacked the WTC were from other countries in the middle east, not Iraq. A lot of people got confused, though, because the United States kept changing their stories over and over again. First, we were attacked by people in Saudi Arabia and northern Africa. Then we were attacked by Afghanistan. Then we were attacked by Iraq. Then Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Now we're fighting a war on terror.
Do you honestly believe this propoganda?

It is a fact that the last time the U.S. was attacked on their land was in World War II. That's over 60 years ago. All of the wars after that were faught on other country's soil until September 11th. And even now, the Afghanis and Iraqis aren't fighting the U.S. on their territory. The U.S. is going to Iraq to kill them, and the U.S. has military bases in Afghanistan.

George Bush doesn't deserve any credit for protecting this country.
There are documents that prove that the United States knew there was going to be a terrorist attack, and Bush's cabinet did nothing to stop it.

Here's the link: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Akamu is right. Nobody should be supporting George W. Bush, because he's corrupt. I'm not just saying this. 81% of Americans that don't approve Bush are saying this.

I never said that 9/11 was linked to Iraq it never was. I believe it was Osama Bin Laden who was head of the attack and if it wasnt then he should still be in jail. Bin Laden has been on the run so you will never get your anwer if Osama was "really" behind it or not unless he is caught and says something. In his videos he talks about how glad he was seeing the twin towers fall this guy was anti american on all levels and wanted us to be in chaos finacially and literally. And i do believe he was behind it...no one questioed Bush to not go into Afghanistan did they! NO! everyone wanted him to take revenge on Afghanistan, even people that hate Bush now. Americans will say anything to get their way especially people that hate Bush. Saddam then threatened us on national television that he had chemical weapons so since he doesnt have them its not our fault for trying to protect the USA. If someone says i have gun and im gonna use it, are you gonna wait untill he uses it? Or are you gonna stop him from using it or possibly getting it? We all know that if we never went to Iraq than Saddam wouldhave gotten a nuclear weapon.

I never said that 9/11 was linked to Iraq it never was. I believe it was Osama Bin Laden who was head of the attack and if it wasnt then he should still be in jail. Bin Laden has been on the run so you will never get your anwer if Osama was "really" behind it or not unless he is caught and says something. In his videos he talks about how glad he was seeing the twin towers fall this guy was anti american on all levels and wanted us to be in chaos finacially and literally. And i do believe he was behind it...no one questioed Bush to not go into Afghanistan did they! NO! everyone wanted him to take revenge on Afghanistan, even people that hate Bush now. Americans will say anything to get their way especially people that hate Bush. Saddam then threatened us on national television that he had chemical weapons so since he doesnt have them its not our fault for trying to protect the USA. If someone says i have gun and im gonna use it, are you gonna wait untill he uses it? Or are you gonna stop him from using it or possibly getting it? We all know that if we never went to Iraq than Saddam wouldhave gotten a nuclear weapon.

Lol. Saddam didn't have **** and we knew it. He need to feign power or Iran would have attacked Iraq again. Actually do some research before you run your mouth and please, just get off G. W.'s dick.

I never said that 9/11 was linked to Iraq it never was. I believe it was Osama Bin Laden who was head of the attack and if it wasnt then he should still be in jail. Bin Laden has been on the run so you will never get your anwer if Osama was "really" behind it or not unless he is caught and says something. In his videos he talks about how glad he was seeing the twin towers fall this guy was anti american on all levels and wanted us to be in chaos finacially and literally. And i do believe he was behind it...no one questioed Bush to not go into Afghanistan did they! NO! everyone wanted him to take revenge on Afghanistan, even people that hate Bush now. Americans will say anything to get their way especially people that hate Bush. Saddam then threatened us on national television that he had chemical weapons so since he doesnt have them its not our fault for trying to protect the USA. If someone says i have gun and im gonna use it, are you gonna wait untill he uses it? Or are you gonna stop him from using it or possibly getting it? We all know that if we never went to Iraq than Saddam wouldhave gotten a nuclear weapon.

No weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq, so I don't know what you're talking about. Sadam Hussein never threatened to attack the United States. Osama Bin Laden did, but the last time I checked, Bin Laden and Hussein are two different people.

It is a fact that the United States gave weapons to Iraq, in the 1980s, to help them fight Iran. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

The U.S. were just hoping that Iraq still had some of those weapons, so that they could make up a fake reason for why they went to Iraq.

Afghanistan didn't blow up the World Trade Center. Read my bbc website, if you want. I posted it as one of the links.

Your analogy makes no sense, because Iraq never said they were going to fight the United States. Iraq, like many countries, fear the United States. Why do they fear the United States? Because the United States has a lot of allies, and they actually are the ones that have nuclear weapons.

Here's a link: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

The United States have killed 1.2 million Iraqis, since the war started in 2003.

Here's the link: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

George Bush was wrong for starting wars period. If you can't see that, then ignore all the facts that I presented. That's the only way you could possibly have anything good to say about Bush.

This is all I really have to say. I'm not going to go back and fourth on an issue about George W. Bush.
It's a shame that people still have support for him, after all the people that died, as a result of his evil ambitions.

I didnt want to argue anyone cuz im basically solo on this site with my political views, just tellin everyone my views, idc if you dont like them....and by the way Bush is gonna be out soon so everyone will be happy seeing Obama "change" America. And as of now Mccain is only a few points behind Obama...so you might see Mccain in there. It's gonna be a tight race and i think when they debate each other Obama will rape Mccain basically because Obama's main attribute is his speaking and Mccain's worst attribute is his speaking. So if Obama wins by alot it will be when they debate which im waiting to see.

I never said that 9/11 was linked to Iraq it never was. I believe it was Osama Bin Laden who was head of the attack and if it wasnt then he should still be in jail. Bin Laden has been on the run so you will never get your anwer if Osama was "really" behind it or not unless he is caught and says something.

Paul dear, just forget about bin laden, al-qaeda, the talibans, etc. Bush gave you 9/11 so he can offer you protection, and take your liberties. Just like in school, when you get bullied and then the bully offers you protection in exchange of money. The situation is basically the same. Terror is the greatest fear, so he gave you that because that's what unites people. And by 9/11 he got all the USA around him which allowed him to start the war with iraq. Afganistan was just a fluke. A "war" that was never intended to be won, or for bin laden to be captured, just a pretext to go for oil in Iraq. Why do you think bin laden wasn't found yet, after almost 10 years now? Because he hides so well? Or because he is not supposed to be found? You are aware that he has collaborated with the CIA for decades, and that his family is in close connection with the Bush family, right? Trust me on this, he will be captured when he needs to be captured, not when the american people want. And when that will happen, no one will care anymore.. Similar with the karadzic case, which was such a big joke for me.. Who the **** believes that story??

FYI: [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] | [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] | [Only registered and activated users can see links. ][Only registered and activated users can see links. ][Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Paul dear, just forget about bin laden, al-qaeda, the talibans, etc. Bush gave you 9/11 so he can offer you protection, and take your liberties. Just like in school, when you get bullied and then the bully offers you protection in exchange of money. The situation is basically the same. Terror is the greatest fear, so he gave you that because that's what unites people. And by 9/11 he got all the USA around him which allowed him to start the war with iraq. Afganistan was just a fluke. A "war" that was never intended to be won, or for bin laden to be captured, just a pretext to go for oil in Iraq. Why do you think bin laden wasn't found yet, after almost 10 years now? Because he hides so well? Or because he is not supposed to be found? You are aware that he has collaborated with the CIA for decades, and that his family is in close connection with the Bush family, right? Trust me on this, he will be captured when he needs to be captured, not when the american people want. And when that will happen, no one will care anymore.. Similar with the karadzic case, which was such a big joke for me.. Who the **** believes that story??

You still cant deny the fact that almost every poll after 9/11 had the American people wanting to attack someone in revenge so no matter what u feel is was gonna happen. You really think we were gonna wait untill the smoke settled and try to figure out if it was an inside job? NO, democrats, republicans and even independents wanted to attack someone in revenge and the evidence pointed us to Bin Laden and Afghanistan at the time. I watched every news channel when it occured and every poll was saying to attack, attack and attack. If Bush didnt attack somewhere do you know how pissed the American people would be?? HOLY SHYT theyd be calling Bush a ***** untill his death and then their would be an uproar from the American people that he isnt a real president for just letting this happen. Go back in history, everyone wanted war to happen at that time and it happened so to complain about it now when everyone wanted it to happen back then is why i find it ridiculous by many to be against it. People saw this attack as Pearl harbor part 2 and no one was gonna let Bush sit back and make peace.LOLOL peace? that fukin ridiculous you cant make peace with countries that want to annihilate you an your allies, all you can do is max out your national security, hence the patriot act, and try your best so this shyt wont happen again and that any terrorist cant infiltrate AMerica so easily. Look at London, i think most of their population now consist of Muslims and then you see back then that there were terrorist planning a huge attack that they caught thank god. To say there arent terrorist wanting to kill us is a foolish overlooked statement just watch some of the Al-Queda, Hamas videos for example they arent joking.