Behavior has consequences! This applies both to individuals and to societies. Learn how most of the crises presented by politicians and the media can be traced to the cumulative effects of our own behavior in 5 key areas: Economic Understanding, Discipline, Responsibility, Critical Thinking, and Perspective. Ignoring behavior leads to failure; using this new model leads to real answers.
New examples every MONDAY and FRIDAY!

Popular Posts

Friday, May 5, 2017

Fake Advertising

When you say something inaccurate about a product, it’s
considered false advertising.What about
when you say something that is technically true for all products, yours and all
your competitors, but you say it in a way to imply your product is
superior?That is not technically false
advertising, but it can be as deceptive, trying to take advantage of uninformed
shoppers.

A recent example came
from the bottle of orange juice labeled as Non-GMO.After a little research I found that GMO
oranges have not yet been developed, so all orange juice is non-GMO.The development of the modified oranges is an
effort to save the industry from a devastating disease while reducing the use
of insecticides.This brand is just
trying to prey on those naïve shoppers who are automatically scared by the term
GMO and lured in by the opposite.(Actually, some non-GMO products contain fewer vitamins than their GMO alternatives.)

This orange juice incident came on the heels of Hunt’s Company likewise claiming that their tomatoes were non-GMO when that is also
true of everyone else.You can even buy
non-GMO salt! – Although where they would find genes in NaCl to modify is a
mystery.

Now I find, proudly announced on my favorite store-brand ice
cream carton, the words, “NO artificial hormones in our cream and milk.” Are they trying to rely on my lack of
scientific knowledge or disinclination to look things up to scare me into
buying their brand?It seems they are.

When I look up artificial hormones in cows and milk (usually
abbreviated rbGH or sometimes BST), I find a host of information.Most of it is negative and scary.The words cancer
and Monsanto are prominent with lots
of discussion of organic superiority.But these are the emotional arguments obviously written to promote the same knee-jerk negative
reactions to anything not pure and natural.

In one of these from the Sustainable
Table, they explain that hormone-treated cows give milk with an elevated level of
IGF-1, but add:“Although no direct
connection has been made between elevated IGF-1 levels in milk and elevated
IGF-1 levels or cancer in humans, some scientists have expressed concern over
the possibility of this relationship.”What,
no direct link, only a concern about the possibility?

The FDA approves the practice of treating cows.They found “that the available
data confirm that biologically significant amounts of rbGH are not absorbed in
humans following the consumption of milk from cows treated with rbGH.”

More detailed scientific information comes from a Utah State University posting.“There are no
differences in milk composition from cows treated with BST and from cows which
were not treated. All cows produce BST and all milk contains BST.”“The synthetic form of BST cannot be
distinguished in the milk from the natural form.”

They also point out that “BST is digested by humans just
like any other protein…one would not obtain the active hormone by drinking milk
or eating cheese.”

This contradicts the common idea found
in the scarier articles tell you concern for your family should lead you to choose from their list of brands that are safe, where in reality they are all safe.

Finally, a site billing itself as “Science-based
information & resources on agriculture, food and technology” has quite a
bit to say about the real science behind the artificial hormone panic.“Extensive studies of rbGH safety have
been conducted worldwide and reviewed by the FDA, after which both milk and
meat from rbGH-injected cows were deemed safe. Separate reviews of the data by
the National Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization, the Office of
the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, and
reviews by the Journal of the American Medical Association and the Journal of
the American Dietetic Association all independently concluded that milk from
rbGH injected cows is safe.”They
explain that the reason for the bans in the EU and Canada were driven by
consumer concerns but primarily “based not on human health concerns but on
animal welfare issues.”

Each time one of these false arguments wins, we pay more for an unnecessary difference. I have found another brand of ice cream, but don't expect my individual action will stop the tsunami of bad science.Each one of these trigger words on the package is an indirect insult to us all, playing on unsubstantiated
consumer fears.Ironically, the most artificial parts of our food supply seem to be the
myths promulgated by advertisers to manipulate so many credulous consumers.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

is highly qualified to comment on the connection between our behavioral choices and the results we get. His formal education and training in observing and classifying behavior is supported by more than 40 years of practical business experience and 10 years of personal research. He is a West Point graduate with two Master’s degrees in business.
He is also a published author, Master Gardener and RYT200 yoga teacher.