4 comments:

Its like discussing the Geoff Hurst goal in 1966 - was it over the line or not?

The fact remains, the Welsh Lib Dems don't even deserve office.

To have any of them in WAG would be doing Wales a total disservice.

Burham, Bates and Black with their mitts on the levers of power, should send a shiver down anyone's spine - they are in most part bonkers and are typical of the piss-poor Regional AM calibre, that currently blights the Assembly.

Please let's move on this Huw Lewis inspired wet-dream drivel. Does the Welsh taxpayer really have pay for his office to come up with juvenile stuff like this?

Where is Sir Roger Jones when you really want him to really sort out AMs' staffing arrangements?

Bethan is right. I don't think anyone except the lib dems believe they were not responsible. To be honest I think even the Lib Dems know they did this but given the rainbow wreaker Kirsty is their leader they have to oppose that view extra hard.

The sad thing is that Peter Black has perpetuated his lies on the matter so much i think he is starting to believe them.

The fact remains the lib dem national exec did not endorse it. After that the rainbow was done.

In a way they're both right. Obviously the lib dem exec tied vote changed the game but Black is right to say that the lib dems then voted for the rainbow, and Plaid continued to negotiate rainbow implemnetation and the One Wales deal with labour in the weeks after. Perhaps Bethan wasn't told about the continuing rainbow discussions by pladi leadership?

We are broadcast journalists reporting on Welsh politics. If it's in Wales and it's to do with politics then we're on it. We're completely impartial and totally frank. Please let us know what you think.