Tuesday, January 28, 2014

I suspect that Bret Stephens’ column sits behind a paywall. It’s an interesting reductio ad
absurdum of the current debate over inequality.

Obviously, income inequality exists. It has gotten worse
during the Obama administration. In a competitive world outcomes cannot always
correspond to your ideal version of the a diverse nation, but today, the disparities are so gross that something will
have to be done about it. One suspects that the solution does not lie in making
a fetish of equality and trying to produce it by legislation.

Since Stephens wants to demonstrate the absurdity of
worshipping at the altar of Equality, he introduces his column with a prescient
text from a 1961 story, “Harrison Bergeron” by master absurdist, Kurt Vonnegut.

Vonnegut wrote:

The year was 2081, and everybody was finally
equal. They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every
which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than
anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this
equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution,
and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper
General.

Stephens was inspired to push up
the date and show how equality might be legislated:

The
year was 2019 and Americans were finally on their way toward real equality. Not
just equality in God's eyes, or before the law, or in opportunity.

They
were going to be equal every which way.

All
this equality was due to bold new government action. There was the Decent Wage
Act of 2017, which pegged the minimum wage to the (inflation-adjusted) average
hourly wage of 2016. There was the NEW-AMT, which set a 55% minimum federal tax
rate on individual income over $150,000 (or 80% for incomes above $500,000).
There was the Unemployment Insurance Is Forever Act of 2018. There was the 2018
De Blasio-Waxman CEO Pay Act, which mandated a 9-to-1 ratio between the highest
and lowest paid person in any enterprise.

Stephens tries to be even-handed. In his dystopian
vision, Republicans join the anti-inequality party:

Though
most conservatives were resistant to the Equality Movement, some found the new
political environment congenial to their anti-elitist aims.

There
was the Grassley-Amash De-Tenure Act of 2016, which abolished the
"monstrous inequality" of college-faculty tenure. That was soon
followed by the Amash-Grassley Graduate Student Liberation Act of 2017, ending
the "master-slave" relationship between professors and their teaching
and research assistants.

More
controversial was the Grassley-Gowdy De-Ivy Act of 2018, requiring all
four-year colleges, public or private, to accept students by lottery. Besides
its stated goal of "ending elitism and extending the promise of equality
to tertiary education," many conservatives saw it as a backdoor method of
eliminating affirmative action. Liberals countered that it had precisely the
opposite effect.

It is a bad idea trying to make reality march to the rhythm
of a grandiose ideal.