Comments on: In the wake of SEC/Goldman, the must-read Appendixhttp://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/04/19/in-the-wake-of-secgoldman-the-must-read-appendix/
Option ARMageddonTue, 14 Oct 2014 13:06:34 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.3By: reallifenowhttp://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/04/19/in-the-wake-of-secgoldman-the-must-read-appendix/comment-page-1/#comment-5500
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:29:00 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=5973#comment-5500The SEC isn’t finished with their (our) indictments. They indicted GS to give notice. There are many more civil and eventually, criminal, indictments to follow. Stay tuned!
]]>By: REDruinhttp://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/04/19/in-the-wake-of-secgoldman-the-must-read-appendix/comment-page-1/#comment-5499
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:28:57 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=5973#comment-5499Heh. What that tells me, is what the historical lasseiz-faire attitude of the SEC for the last 15 years has missed. This problem was actually so big they managed to catch it…so what have they REALLY missed?

==Bob

]]>By: Storyburncom_ishttp://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/2010/04/19/in-the-wake-of-secgoldman-the-must-read-appendix/comment-page-1/#comment-5491
Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:00:21 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/rolfe-winkler/?p=5973#comment-5491Nobody has more proof than the SEC and they only found ONE problem. ONE.
]]>