Location: Against fed law to use my religion W.There's no reason to suppress a viewpoint unless it's true,cause a false viewpoint can easily be combated w/facts and logic,while truth cannot be combated except by lies which are vulnerable to refutation.

"I used to vote Socialist, to tell you the truth," he confides. "But now the mainstream parties just can't bring themselves to admit that immigration is the main cause of our problems." People like him, who have turned to the extreme nationalist Hellenic Front "are not Nazis or fascists," he says. "They just have problems and they think that immigration has something to do with them."

That is a message that the leaders of Europe's dominant centrist parties have been reluctant to hear, or to counter. Fortuyn and his counterparts elsewhere "articulated problems with immigration that other politicians refused to address," explains Hans Wansink, a commentator with the liberal Dutch daily De Volkskrant.

Europe's rising right

Across Europe, far-right parties have used concern over rising crime and a growing immigrant population to gather support. Voters are supporting these parties, say analysts, because centrist parties have been unwilling to address these concerns. (See Map.)

Austria: Freedom Party

The anti-immigrant party of Jörg Haider joined Austria's coalition government in 200O. Support has eroded from 27 percent to 16 percent.

Britain: British National Party

The BNP is small and marginal. It won 3 local government seats in municipal elections this month.

Denmark: Progress Party and People's Party.

When it was founded in 1972, the Progress Party called for all Muslims to be expelled from Denmark. The breakaway People's Party holds 22 seats in the 179-member parliament and is the country's main rightist party.

Belgium: Vlaams Blok

It favors independence for Flanders, Belgium's Dutch-speaking half, advocates an end to immigration, and promotes the expulsion of immigrants who fail to assimilate into Belgian culture.

Germany: National Democratic Party

Although the party is electorally insignificant, Chancellor Gerhard Schröder has tried to ban it, contending it promotes neo-Nazi ideology.

Italy: National Alliance and Northern League.

The National Alliance is a member of the ruling coalition government. It finished third with 12 percent of the vote in last year's national elections. The Northern League recently supported legislation to deport jobless immigrants.

The Netherlands: Pim Fortuyn's List

The rightist political party whose leader was slain this month could win some 25 seats in the 150-seat parliament in today's election, according to early polls. This would make it the second-largest party in parliament. Fortuyn opposed new immigration, called Islam "backward," and advocated "zero tolerance" of crime.

France: National Front

The party of extreme nationalist Jean-Marie Le Pen, who founded it in 1972, advocates France for the French. Immigrants are often targeted and blamed for French ills, such as high unemployment and violence. It won 18 percent in the second round of the presidential elections this month.

Norway: Party of Progress

The party known for its anti-immigration views won 25 seats in the 165-seat parliament in last September's elections

I think that the problem for US WN is thier electoral system that aren't good for WN.
Haider,Danmark nationalists,Fortuyn's party are not very strong electorally,because they haven't 40 or 51%,but thanks to the proportional electoral system of their countries that wants that at governement goes not a single party,but a coalition of parties,they can go at goverment.

The irony of it all is Americans love to brag about their "democracy", but ultimately we only have two viable parties and the lines of distinction between them have rapidly blurred. From my point of view, one might as well toss a coin in the air as opposed to wasting any real time considering for whom to vote.

The most bizarre aspect of this rigid American adherence to our two-party system is the ferocity with which partisans defend their respective parties, despite the scandalous behavior of them both. There are people that certainly must spend the better part of the day arguing on message boards over who is better --- republicans or democrats. There are people that defend every action of Clinton, and there are those that defend Bush with equal enthusiasm, and neither ever really stop to think that a president is really only a figurehead whose administration lasts 4-8 years. They never realize that whoever is pulling the strings has ensured that every promising politician with presidential potential is already firmly within their realm of influence. Any such person with even a mere scrap of individuality is not be tolerated (i.e., Pat Buchanan) no matter how popular he may be with the electorate. Since the pullers of the strings also control education and media, well you can imagine how easy it is to groom candidates into simple puppets.