If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

WE TRUST V4LB!!! HE IS THE GREATEST GUY IN OUR FOURM.
WITHOUT HIM OUR FOURM WOULDNT BE EXCITING.
HE GETS ALL THE WOMEN!!!!
HE IS NEVER WRONG!!!
WE TRIED TO VOTE FOR HIM FOR PRESIDENT BUT HE IS SO GREAT THAT HE WOULDNT RUN FOR OFFICE

WE TRUST V4LB!!! HE IS THE GREATEST GUY IN OUR FOURM.
WITHOUT HIM OUR FOURM WOULDNT BE EXCITING.
HE GETS ALL THE WOMEN!!!!
HE IS NEVER WRONG!!!
WE TRIED TO VOTE FOR HIM FOR PRESIDENT BUT HE IS SO GREAT THAT HE WOULDNT RUN FOR OFFICE

No they aren't terrible! However, Manning has more to do w/ there success than them being the best thing since sliced bread. Oh and now stokely is a great wideout? So I guess if Ponder was on Denver and Manning was on Minny Ponder would be throwing for 300 and 3 td each week and Manning wouldn't be able to pass for 100 yards?

Stokley has always been a solid wideout. Idk where you have been but he is a guy every team needs. Some one that is dependable.

With Ponder on the broncos, he would probably be putting up similar numbers to Dalton. With Manning on the vikes, he would probably be putting up similar numbers to brett favre's last year with the vikes.

No they aren't terrible! However, Manning has more to do w/ there success than them being the best thing since sliced bread. Oh and now stokely is a great wideout? So I guess if Ponder was on Denver and Manning was on Minny Ponder would be throwing for 300 and 3 td each week and Manning wouldn't be able to pass for 100 yards?

GAME,SET MATCH. I think that agument is now over. Best post all day. Congradulations jhood!!

here we go again when you are cornered start to call names. How old are these guys? Next I'll respond w/ "I'm rubber your glue" lol

Uhh I didn't call you a name, I called you ignorant (which is an adjective) because you were, and are being IGNORANT.

Ignorant
adjective
1. lacking in knowledge or training; unlearned: an ignorant man.
2. lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact: ignorant of quantum physics.
3. uninformed; unaware.
4. due to or showing lack of knowledge or training: an ignorant statement.

What this boils down to is you trying to pick a fight with me and others on here which speaks a great deal towards your level of immaturity.

WE TRUST V4LB!!! HE IS THE GREATEST GUY IN OUR FOURM.
WITHOUT HIM OUR FOURM WOULDNT BE EXCITING.
HE GETS ALL THE WOMEN!!!!
HE IS NEVER WRONG!!!
WE TRIED TO VOTE FOR HIM FOR PRESIDENT BUT HE IS SO GREAT THAT HE WOULDNT RUN FOR OFFICE

Stokley has always been a solid wideout. Idk where you have been but he is a guy every team needs. Some one that is dependable.

With Ponder on the broncos, he would probably be putting up similar numbers to Dalton. With Manning on the vikes, he would probably be putting up similar numbers to brett favre's last year with the vikes.

I gotta disagree there. No question about it he'd be playing better than Ponder, however if he was here we'd be hearing all about how he's not the same QB and never will be as good again.

Favre didn't magic anybody into being a good WR. He had a great rookie in Harvin and Sidney Rice ready for a break-out year. Obviously Favre was good enough to be able to capitalize on their talent (no doubt Manning could have accomplished the same or more had he been a Viking in 2009) but there was something to work with too.

I don't see anyone on this roster with the possible exception of Wright (and Harvin of course) as being capable of that kind of potential.

WE TRUST V4LB!!! HE IS THE GREATEST GUY IN OUR FOURM.
WITHOUT HIM OUR FOURM WOULDNT BE EXCITING.
HE GETS ALL THE WOMEN!!!!
HE IS NEVER WRONG!!!
WE TRIED TO VOTE FOR HIM FOR PRESIDENT BUT HE IS SO GREAT THAT HE WOULDNT RUN FOR OFFICE

Stokley has always been a solid wideout. Idk where you have been but he is a guy every team needs. Some one that is dependable.

With Ponder on the broncos, he would probably be putting up similar numbers to Dalton. With Manning on the vikes, he would probably be putting up similar numbers to brett favre's last year with the vikes.

By Favre numbers. do you mean cell ph. nubers . Like that chick in NY cell ph. number.joke! I think Manning is way to professional to play as bad as Brett that last year. But to be fair he was hurt most of it.

I gotta disagree there. No question about it he'd be playing better than Ponder, however if he was here we'd be hearing all about how he's not the same QB and never will be as good again.

Favre didn't magic anybody into being a good WR. He had a great rookie in Harvin and Sidney Rice ready for a break-out year. Obviously Favre was good enough to be able to capitalize on their talent (no doubt Manning could have accomplished the same or more had he been a Viking in 2009) but there was something to work with too.

I don't see anyone on this roster with the possible exception of Wright (and Harvin of course) as being capable of that kind of potential.

Originally Posted by iowavike

By Favre numbers. do you mean cell ph. nubers . Like that chick in NY cell ph. number.joke! I think Manning is way to professional to play as bad as Brett that last year. But to be fair he was hurt most of it.

I totally read that wrong. I thought we were talking Favre 2009 not Favre 2010. In that case yeah, iowavike is right, Manning now is better than Favre in 2010, but the talk would be similar, we'd be hearing how he shouldn't have come back and how he should retire after this year because he just doesn't have it anymore.

WE TRUST V4LB!!! HE IS THE GREATEST GUY IN OUR FOURM.
WITHOUT HIM OUR FOURM WOULDNT BE EXCITING.
HE GETS ALL THE WOMEN!!!!
HE IS NEVER WRONG!!!
WE TRIED TO VOTE FOR HIM FOR PRESIDENT BUT HE IS SO GREAT THAT HE WOULDNT RUN FOR OFFICE