Launceston's heritage is a great asset which is reflected in the large number of original buildings and features

Recently a poll was conducted on elaunceston regional portal to determine whether we should allow signage on heritage buildings, eg the proposed neon sign for Postreos cafe in the old post office?

Early polling is leaning towards allowing the signage,however each application must be considered on it's merits.

I believe that all signage and additions to heritage buildings should be open for public representation.

We can not expect our local government representatives and employees to be totally correct in their approaches every time a development or building application is submitted to Council.

The neon sign for Postreos may be able to be accommodated on the old post office without detracting significantly from the building's heritage character,but by placing it there are we are creating a possibility that further intrusions will be made easier?

The National Trust and Heritage Council, similarly may not always get it right.

The approach that ought to be taken by the Launceston City Council when receiving representations on the various issues that it has to consider on a daily basis should be to allow maximum access to Officers and Aldermen of Council to all , regrettably the Launceston City Council actually takes the minimal approach and constantly refers to "The Local Government Act" as if it is "The Bible and can not be varied upon or amended.

However when it suits the Launceston City Council, it does overlook the act, pity they are not able to when the public interest can be advantaged.