We needn’t dismiss the studies published in recent years that seem to suggest circumcised males are somewhat less at risk for certain STDs than are uncircumcised males. It just strikes me as a procedure that an adult male can choose to have done to himself, should he wish.

We needn’t dismiss the studies published in recent years that seem to suggest circumcised males are somewhat less at risk for certain STDs than are uncircumcised males. It just strikes me as a procedure that an adult male can choose to have done to himself, should he wish.

Baptism is much more harmful than circumcision.
Males can function fairly well without a foreskin.
When one’s critical thinking is surgically
removed and the brain is doused in magical thinking
the person is condemned to a fantasy nether-world composed of
hope, fear and delusion.

We needn’t dismiss the studies published in recent years that seem to suggest circumcised males are somewhat less at risk for certain STDs than are uncircumcised males. It just strikes me as a procedure that an adult male can choose to have done to himself, should he wish.

Baptism is much more harmful than circumcision.
Males can function fairly well without a foreskin.
But when one’s critical thinking is surgically
removed and the brain is doused in magical thinking
the person is condemned to a fantasy nether-world composed of
hope, fear and delusion.