Ellen Page and Toni Collette Are Feminists, But Susan Sarandon Is Not?

This month has been a mixed one for the F word in Hollywood. Just as Ellen Page and Toni Collette showed us what feminists look like, Susan Sarandon baffled many of her women fans by refusing to claim the term.

How could it be any more obvious that we still live in a patriarchal world when feminism is a bad word?

Page even went so far as to admit a problem with Juno, the movie in which she plays a pregnant teenager who decides not to have an abortion after a protestor tells her that the fetus has fingernails. The actor didn’t stop there: She laments the lack of films about women, says she’s writing her own feminist movie, and openly disses Hollywood for its sexism:

It’s constant! It’s how you’re treated, it’s how you’re looked at, how you’re expected to look in a photoshoot, it’s how you’re expected to shut up and not have an opinion … If you’re a girl and you don’t fit the very specific vision of what a girl should be, which is always from a man’s perspective, then you’re a little bit at a loss.

Toni Collette, whose new show Hostages premiers on CBS this fall, went off in an interview with Refinery 29 about the ways Hollywood enforces a narrow code of appropriate appearance and behavior:

Some of the characters I’ve played have not felt comfortable in themselves, and so there’s a physical counterpart to that. That’s what happens in life, you know? We do things to protect ourselves, to deny ourselves, or to present something we’re not, or to hide something we are. … Now, the media has other agendas: It’s not about reflecting humanity, it’s about dictatorship and being dogmatic in telling people how to dress, how to look, what to say, what to do with your life, how to spend your time, everything.

Collette’s embrace of the term feminist is new, but she no longer hesitates to call her philosophy what it is:

For years people would say to me, ‘You are [a feminist]! You are! You really are!’ And I’d say, ‘No, I’m not. I’m a humanist. I think it’s sexist to say I’m a feminist.’ Now, I see a great imbalance not only in my industry, but also in the world at large. I want to change it. … It needs to be varied and real.

Unfortunately, Susan Sarandon is still playing the humanist card. Despite being a frequent speaker on reproductive rights, Sarandon told The Guardian that she thinks “feminist” is “a bit of an old-fashioned word. It’s used more in a way to minimize you.” But unlike when Katy Perry, Taylor Swift, and Marissa Mayer declared their lack of allegiance to the sisterhood, Sarandon has suffered little backlash for her statement, a fact that Lizzie Crocker at The Daily Beast attributes to her longstanding and outspoken support for feminist causes.

No doubt for some, Sarandon’s activist cred warrants giving her a pass. But the response may also have been muted because, unlike Perry, Swift and Taylor, who stated categorically that they do not believe in feminism, Sarandon did not reject feminist beliefs, she simply said that she does not call herself a feminist. In fact in the same interview she intimated that she does “want everyone to have equal pay, equal rights, education and healthcare,” all of which are feminist ideals.

Whereas Swift rejected feminism because she thinks it’s a “guys versus girls thing,” Sarandon seems to understand both the philosophy of and need for feminism. She frames her rejection of the label as strategic: Feminist is a word that is used to dismiss women. She’s right, of course. The more progress feminists make in achieving parity, the harder opponents have to work to discredit them, and redefining feminist to mean man-hater has proven to be a very successful strategy.

What feminists disagree with Sarandon on is whether this foreswearing of the name constitutes a good strategy or not. Sarandon may very well be tired of having to justify her beliefs to haters—no doubt she’s had to do so many times. The constant demand that we defend ourselves is a big part of what has made some feminists so quick to take offense at anyone who rejects the term. But are we really at the point where we need to cede authority over the meaning of the word entirely?

Yes, feminism has taken on some negative connotations. But those connotations are not accurate; they’re the product of years of backlash. I don’t know a single feminist who sees what they do as “guys versus girls.” None of them have, as Melissa Mayer claimed, a chip on their shoulder. Most of them don’t even share the exact definition of feminism. What they do share is a conviction that action is needed in order to make our world a more peaceful and equitable place. Sarandon’s activism indicates that she shares this conviction, though she will only call herself a humanist.

Collette, on the other hand, recognizes an important distinction: Humanism is not really an alternative to feminism. Humanism is a cultural and educational philosophy that defines mankind as capable of betterment through study and reason. In this case, a rose by any other name does not smell as sweet: Though there are various definitions of feminism, there really is no synonym, no other word that accurately describes our beliefs.

Perhaps Sarandon sees activism as something more appropriate to rallies and fundraisers than to Hollywood. That Page and Collette — women who have far more to risk from being openly political than the long-established Sarandon — are not afraid to call themselves feminist is heartening. That they are actively engaged in using their positions to change the equation in Hollywood is more than heartening. It’s inspiring.

Comments

I reject the labels. While my actions and philosophy are aligned with the feminist perspective, I resent anyone trying to slap a label on me as a way to wrap me up in some sort of neat, little package.

When women (and men) run from this word, they are running from a whole history of women’s rights. They are running from Susan B. Anthony and Gloria Steinem. They are running from bell hooks and Charlotte Perkins Gilman. They are running from Angela Davis and Bella Abzug. They are running from a legacy that we cannot afford to run away from. We all need to embrace feminism, claim it, and move it forward so that we can finally be equal. There is no reason to shy away from a term at the expense of an entire movement. Silly.

I think it’s worth recognizing that when you have any movement or philosophy that comes with a label, there’s going to be negative baggage attached to it. Feminism is no different. There are tendencies in feminist thought (and action) that I personally do not agree with. And I know that there are critiques of aspects of feminism even within the feminist movement (for instance critiques of the fact that Western feminism can entail white privilege and paternalism towards non-white cultures). So when I see women who for all practical purposes are feminist rejecting the “feminist” label, I imagine they may have legitimate reasons for doing so. I know that this is not exactly what this article is focusing on, but it’s been on my mind for a while and I just wanted to put my thoughts out there.

I don’t have a problem with Susan Sarandon’s declaration. I think a person’s actions speak louder than their labels. I grew up in the US women’s movement and have met a lot of self proclaimed “feminists” whose practice was nothing like what I understand the word feminist to mean. Malpractice of feminist principles is the dirty secret in feminism, so let’s judge a person by their actions and whether they wrap themselves in the label. I found a great saying that didn’t have attribution, but it is perfect: “Don’t talk, just act. Don’t say, just show. Don’t promise, just prove.”