I am not taking anything from Djokovic, he truly deserved the whole tournament, pretty much destroying everyone in straight sets.
From Murray's part I expected him to play more aggressively, but Djoker was the one who since the first ball was being more aggressive. Murray played like He always does, pushing the ball waiting for his opponent to make mistakes and the way Djoker played this whole thing it didn't happen, but at least He should have mixed up all the variety He is supposed to have.
Murray is said to be a genius, this and that. He isn't, if He were He would've changed his tactic of trying to make it physical and long, which actually back fired on him, since after this one point on the first set that he almost stooped during the rally looking for some oxygen, He was never the same, then Djoker broke him, served out the set and won 6 games in row.
He isn't a tactician. If He were He would have tried something different, and I am not saying He would've won, but it could have been a try, you don;t win a lottery without playing right?About the US Open, Djoker played better against Fed than VS Nadal. That final was awful, was never interesting.

You are wrong about just about everything related to tennis and you are wrong here as well.

The way Djokovic played, there is nothing Murray should be ashamed of. Murray didnít beat himself, and most players would have lost to this Djokovic by much more embarrassing scores.
I donít think anyone would have beaten Djokovic here. It took Nadal the very best tennis he has ever played so far (on hard courts) to beat him in the USO final. But Nadal was not at that level in this tournament. Djokovic was, or at least pretty close.

Iíve just watched a set of excellent HD highlights from that USO final to compare. About 30 minutes in total. I still think that match was the best tennis I saw all year. If the near future can bring more of that, it should be wellcome. This is a truly awsome display by both:

That was a great match. Anyone who says it wasn't "because it wasn't a classic 5-setter" doesn't have a clue. The end of the second set, Djokovic went into God-mode, unfortunately he was unable to sustain it for the remainder of the match.

Novak was virtually unplayable last night. From seemingly lost positions he would throw up sliding full-stretch defensive lobs that would land right on the baseline.

What you guys are forgetting is that Murray served in the low 60's and He normally is on low 50's and Djokovic has been returning like I've never seen before. He saw a basketball when they served, anything they threw at him came back, there were some first serves He was stretched, gave a 360 lap around himself and still won points, not mention that He was sliding on the court as if it were clay.
Absolutely amazing performance throughout this tournament.

Yeah, as much as I dislike the Djoker, I totallya gree. He returned so well (and backed everything up so well) that Roger and Murray both looked weak on serve. Even weaker on 2nd serve.

As a *******, a Fedophile, a practicing Baghdatist, a J-Block-er and a bit of a Murr-on, I feel this two weeks could've been better, but.....
Bravo, Djoko. Well played. Playing like the World no. 1 at the moment. Davis Cup champ, two GS finals in a row. Aus Open Champ. Well deserved.

Damn, I didn't expect Murray to be destroyed by Baghi man.
Murray already reached his prime, is only down hill now.

I think it's more that Baggy is playing back to form after a series of problems.

AndyM hasn't been the only one to do a post-AO wipeout. Simon just got knocked out today by a qualifier, after taking Roger to 5 and before that, winning the Sydney championship. Ferru got knocked out in his 1R -- I was hoping for a final between them, AMOF -- and has withdrawn from BA as well, where he was a finalist last year.

People are tired. It takes a lot to get through the AO and do well and then go on to do well somewhere else, especially on back to back hardcourts. It takes a lot out of you.

(Interestingly, the guys playing on clay right now that also did fairly well at the AO - Tommy, Sasha - seem to be doing okay.)

But then, you do frequently have a tendency to be a little negative.

__________________
"Before and after the match you are the same, no?" - RN
"Pain is only temporary. Victory is forever." - RF

I think it's more that Baggy is playing back to form after a series of problems.

AndyM hasn't been the only one to do a post-AO wipeout. Simon just got knocked out today by a qualifier, after taking Roger to 5 and before that, winning the Sydney championship. Ferru got knocked out in his 1R -- I was hoping for a final between them, AMOF -- and has withdrawn from BA as well, where he was a finalist last year.

People are tired. It takes a lot to get through the AO and do well and then go on to do well somewhere else, especially on back to back hardcourts. It takes a lot out of you.

(Interestingly, the guys playing on clay right now that also did fairly well at the AO - Tommy, Sasha - seem to be doing okay.)

But then, you do frequently have a tendency to be a little negative.

Tommy understand that it his time to shine....He allways does well during that Early Clay Season! Sasha....well he needs more ranking points! He is young and feeling of that postive result is pushing him!

Ferrer must be really dissapointed....his second chance to get to a final and bid for a win! Murray...Enuff Said! Don't know about simon...I guess he wants to see daughter!

__________________
Why fight over who is G.O.A.T., when the world is just an abstract of reality~ http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/525347

Terrible loss for Murray. He really needs to get that Australian Open final loss out of system and then he goes and loses to Baghdatis like that. A repeat of his woeful 2010 post-AO period is not what he needs.

Damn, I didn't expect Murray to be destroyed by Baghi man.Murray already reached his prime, is only down hill now.

Good luck to Baghi. He's a great player.
No shame for Murray. Reaching three slam finals and two slam semis and winning 6 Masters titles, reaching a career high ranking of number 2 in the world, beating two of the greatest players ever along the way.
That's not a bad prime by most people's standards wouldn't you say.
What would you give to have that record?
Especially for a British player.
And who knows, there may be more left in the tank?
The future is unknown. Hindesight on the other hand.
Who's that in your avatar Buckethead?

It was a despicable performance. He is in a position with respect to ranking and opportunity that so many less fortunate/less talented tennis players would envy; yet he finds a way to squander his chances and disgrace the sport at every turn.

It was a despicable performance. He is in a position with respect to ranking and opportunity that so many less fortunate/less talented tennis players would envy; yet he finds a way to squander his chances and disgrace the sport at every turn.

Well said.
How can a top 10 lose to that guy, Murray just proved He is a genius.