U.N. Ozark Arkansas, Missouri Land Grabs

We've seen the maps of the "wilderness areas" that TPTB want to keep people out of and force them into urban areas to be corraled and controlled with the least amount of effort.

I stumbled upon this article as I was looking for land in the Ozarks (said to be safer for future ELE events, and more recently, having a fortress being built by what I think I read as a Defense Department geospacial big wig.)

Although this process has started years ago, the information contained within is too important to go unposted. Want to know how they start aquiring these things? Read the link below and notice some tricks they use, such as donating $25 to keep the Ozarks beautiful (funds going to the U.N. to further their agenda)

Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government.

Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1223606

"the panties too, boy, take off them panties too....now bend over and squeal like a pig for me, boy".

Speakers at such meetings were a combination of local Biosphere Reserve 'researchers,' seasoned private property rights activists, as well as some national UN/environmental conspiracy experts. The goal of speakers was to share information and interpretations about Biosphere Reserves, the OMAB nomination, and a variety of other pertinent information.

LOL, I don't understand the why the word conspiracy was used. The U.N. is trying to take over many places.

Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1223606

yellow stones supposed to have a sign that says owned by the UN....as a few more "national parks" <--i use that term loosely

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~The Queen Of Mean / VENOMmennonn

*Dont fuck with me; ill jump on my menstrual cycle & run your ass over ;)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Every closed eye is not sleeping, and every open eye is not seeing~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~The universe responds NOT to what you want.....it responds to what you are being.......are you being what you want?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~the karma cafe has no menus. you get served what you deserve~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~when a country is greatly disoriented —as it is currently in America with regards to polarization on many issues— that it’s easy for the Government —and other powers that be— to manipulate the public with lies and deceit. This is not a new strategy, but one that has been implemented in this country —as well as others— for centuries. It’s specifically designed to control the masses by generating and perpetuating confusion. in the past the truth about certain national incidents were not found out and revealed to the public for years. Now, thanks to the internet, it takes only a few months to discover the policies and activities of our Government and mega-corporate empires —that are criminal to say the least.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dear Progressives, Feelings aren't facts. Perception is not reality. We are not responsible for your inability to comprehend the difference.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~FREEDOM OF SPEECH: Alan Isaacman The People Vs Larry Flynt"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you've heard a lot here today and I won't try to go back over it all. But you have to go back in that room and make some decisions and there is one thing I want to make very clear to you before you do. I'm not trying to convince you that you should like what Larry Flynt does. I don't like what he does. But what I do like is... that I live in a country... where you and I can make that decision for ourselves. I like that I live in a country where I can pick up Hustler magazine... read it if I want... or throw it in the trash, if that's where I think it belongs. Or better yet I can express my opinion by not buying it. I like that right. I care about it. And you should care about it, too... because we live in a free country. We say that a lot, but sometimes we forget what that means, so listen again. We live in a free country. That is a powerful idea. That's a magnificent way to live. But there is a price for that freedom, which is that sometimes... we have to tolerate things that we don't necessarily like. So go back in that room... where you are free to think whatever you want to think... about Larry Flynt and Hustler magazine. But then ask yourselves if you want to make that decision for the rest of us... because the freedom that everyone in this room enjoys... is, in a very real way, in your hands. If we start throwing up walls against what some of us think is obscene... we may wake up one morning and realize... that walls have been thrown upin places we never expected... and we can't see anythingor... do anything. And that's not freedom. That is not freedom. So, be careful. Thank you."VIDEO: [link to youtu.be]

According to opponents, the primary symptom of a coming 'green' socialist government is the erosion of private property rights. The loss of ownership and control of private property was equated with the loss of Constitutionally guaranteed individual rights and privileges. Access to property ownership and land use rights are, according to opponents, tantamount to the preservation of democracy and national sovereignty. The trend toward environmental regulation, which threatens property ownership and control, is conceived of as a trend toward socialism or communism. Jane Darcy, a Take Back Arkansas representative, indicated that the Biosphere Reserve issue highlighted growing problems of suppression and control of individual rights and freedoms by government. She commented on the core issue saying:

[T]here isn't one government agency given the opportunity to spread their authority and take rights that won't put this nation in real… I don't know what you would call it… throes of actual communism. I mean, there are two systems of government essentially. The system of government that respects individual rights and the system of government that takes those rights, there's no in between. (Jane Darcy, personal interview)

A variety of extraordinary claims about the OMAB circulated throughout the Ozarks and beyond. Some of the more popular allegations were the following: forced reduction and relocation of the Ozark population and placement of citizens in concentration camps; destruction of homes, businesses, and infrastructure in order to reclaim areas as wilderness; accession of Ozark land and natural resources to the United Nations; and the presence or likely arrival of United Nations military troops in the Ozarks, which explained the alleged black helicopter and white tank sightings in the Ozarks region. One letter to the editor suspiciously reported,

They imply the U.N. is concerned about certain life forms, but is this true? Or just another insult to our intelligence? To be honest, the entire matter reeks of subversion. Rumor has it that the U.N. is to train foreign troops on our soil in the art of warfare, but under the guise of "ecological research," and if the federal government goes through with this U.N. land grab the citizens of the Ozarks region will be left out literally in the cold. (Dean 1996:2)

Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government.

"the panties too, boy, take off them panties too....now bend over and squeal like a pig for me, boy".

For example, the West Plains Daily Quill (1997b:1) reprinted a St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial that stated:

It's one thing when the black helicopter crowd gets together in paranoid little klatches to talk about an imminent invasion by the United Nations. It's another when the Missouri Department of Conservation and the National Park Service cancel worthwhile programs to placate the conspiracy buffs.

Final designation of the Ozarks, or perhaps just parts of the Ozarks such as the Current and Jacks Fork Rivers, as a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve, and ultimately a World Heritage Site and Biosphere Reserve "in danger," will remove control of the Ozarks from even the US Government and place the land under control of United Nations World Government.

yellow stones supposed to have a sign that says owned by the UN....as a few more "national parks" <--i use that term loosely

I remember seeing U.N. signs and I don't see them now. I wonder if they took those down. Now it is under the heading of "International Biosphere Reserve". It does have the word "international" in the title-what else would that mean?

"Sunday, November 28, 2010Ozark Schools Going Down Wrong Path With United Nation's International Baccalaureate (IBO) ProgramResidents of Ozark, Missouri, and taxpayers of Christian County should be outraged that officials at Ozark High School have taken $9500 of your money to apply to become a member of the United Nation's International Baccalaureate education program. As well, if the school continues down this path the cost to taxpayers will continue to increase as the sovereignty of our school district continues to be transferred from our community to a world government authority. Those who understand the pathetic job the federal government has contributed to public education in the United States must surely be alarmed to know the United Nations is about to have a say in your child's education.

While school officials are selling the IB program to parents as something that will help prepare kids for college, there is a globalist agenda connected to the IB and it's all part of the corrupt United Nations. In other words, the promise of a better education comes with a liberal globalist agenda. One wouldn't think the conservative community of Ozark would allow this to be taking place in its district, but it's happening very quickly. School officials are stuck on talking points of using IB so kids can get better placement in colleges, but once you peel away the layers of the IB agenda, IB is the last organization you want educating your kids.

If parents are worried about the quality of education, they need to work locally to improve education to better prepare children for college. Looking outside at larger governing bodies such as the federal government has produced years of failures including No Child Left Behind. Now the school officials at Ozark are looking towards the United Nations to educate your children. I don't know if you pay attention to the UN or not, but the anti-American sentiment runs too think for my comfort. So let's look at what the Ozark School Board isn't telling you about the International Baccalaureate.

The International Bureaucratically has a global political mission to produce good little world citizens. I don't believe this is an American idea, especially at a time when so many things that are American are being attacked and withdrawn from our schools. Dr. Ian Hill, Deputy Director of IBO, has said that the goal of IBO is the promotion of world citizenship. Wouldn't our country be better off if our students focus on being good Americans and learning the principles of freedom and the founding fathers over the agenda of the IBO that focuses on a global human rights agenda.

The IBO supports a Earth Charter, a document that opposes many American ideas and a document the United States refuses to ratify. When you start looking into IBO's endorsement of Earth Charter, you will see that it is tied into Marxism and socialism. Surely, that's not what Ozark residents want for their children.

The following statement was issued by IBO:

We, the undersigned, endorse the Earth Charter. We embrace the spirit and aims of the document. We pledge to join the global partnership for a just, sustainable, and peaceful world and to work for the realization of the values and principles of the Earth Charter. We pledge to join the Global Partnership in Support of the Earth Charter Initiative for a sustainable way of life AND urge all governments to endorse the Earth Charter.

The following is a few items of interest parents may want to know before Ozark High School continues spending your tax dollars to enter this Marxist education program:

The Earth Charter is housed in the Arc of Hope and is correctly identified by the World Pantheist Association as a Pantheistic document. Besides Pantheism, the Earth Charter advocates:

1. The redistribution of wealth between nations and within nations [Art. 10.a.]2. Same-sex marriage [Art. 12.a.]3. Spiritual education [Art 14.d.] which means education in Pantheism.4. Military disarmament [Art. 16.d.&e.]5. Creation of an international agency to make the Earth Charter binding on all nations [in The Way Forward action-plan.]"

I'm curious if this is happening elsewhere as well. I read in the 3rd link they are, of course, for gun control. Can't believe Ozark let these people in. (Ozark is the name of a city in the region called the Ozarks, fyi for anyone not from here).

I guess they realize it will take at least a generation to subvert this place. Much harder here for them to push agendas than on the coastal areas.

and more recently, having a fortress being built by what I think I read as a Defense Department geospacial big wig.)

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1223606

more info about that Defense Contractor's fortress that's being built with "concrete and bulletproof glass" ($7 million in materials) - except that it's being built with a new technology they are not willing to reveal: