The only thing I would consider a "fetish" is hands. A person MUST have sexy hands for me to have sex with them. I can't have sex without that being the case, so I consider it a fetish. Everything else I consider a kink because while I much prefer to have those things, not having them won't stop me from being at least somewhat satisfied with the sex.

I don't consider activities to be fetishes (to me they are "kinks"), only body parts or objects. My view is that it doesn't have to be present for sexual arousal, but does result in it. By that definition I have a leather fetish.

The only thing I would consider a "fetish" is hands. A person MUST have sexy hands for me to have sex with them. I can't have sex without that being the case, so I consider it a fetish. Everything else I consider a kink because while
...

The only thing I would consider a "fetish" is hands. A person MUST have sexy hands for me to have sex with them. I can't have sex without that being the case, so I consider it a fetish. Everything else I consider a kink because while I much prefer to have those things, not having them won't stop me from being at least somewhat satisfied with the sex.

Same here! I love sexy hands on men. I think it ties along with having to have sexy hands to spank me during my spanking play! haha

I don't have any fixations (as in, absolutely mandatory for arousal), but in the fetish realm of "not mandatory, but very much appreciated" I like the idea of a guy pinning down my wrists with his hands. Not harshly - gently with just enough force to keep me still.