Still only a kid but Williamson really needs to step up here. Numbers 4, 5, 6 and 7 donít feel you with much confidence though Flynn has shown he can bat time and Franklin once upon a time scored big here.
Interesting to see how McCullum goes, Captain now, so a loose drive or slog whilst in the twenties wonít do.
Probably a good toss to lose for Smith.

Looks like we're going to be back to three-seamers-and-dan in no time judging by this lineup. So dissapointing, should've dropped frinks for Mitch. Hell, should've dropped frinks for anyone really. shoulda shoulda coulda didn't etc.

You could make a vicious drinking game out of "intent" and "hardworker punch above their weight"

Originally Posted by Athlai

Jeets doesn't really deserve to be bowling.

Originally Posted by Athlai

Well yeah Tendy is probably better than Bradman, but Bradman was 70 years ago, if he grew up in the modern era he'd still easily be the best. Though he wasn't, can understand the argument for Tendy even though I don't agree.

Looks like we're going to be back to three-seamers-and-dan in no time judging by this lineup. So dissapointing, should've dropped frinks for Mitch. Hell, should've dropped frinks for anyone really. shoulda shoulda coulda didn't etc.

I think 7 may suit Franko better so we could see more runs out of him I hope.

Also - just on Doull's definition of world class "a player who can make any country in the world" I prefer that definition. We had a thread here on CW and most people voted for world class = "would make the world's best XI"

Originally Posted by HeathDavisSpeed

I got great enjoyment in going to the game and shouting "WHY THE **** ISN'T THIS GAME BEING PLAYED AT THE BASIN?!>!?!?" to reasonably significant cheers from the sparse crowd

Proudly against the bring back Bennett movement since he is injury prone and won't last 5 days.