The irony in all this, of course, is that there’s absolutely JACK known about any figure in history who could have ACTUALLY been King Arthur. The closest we have is a ruler from well BEFORE the time the Arthurian legend is usually set in. As in, war chieftain native to “Britain” who fought against the ROMANS. Hell, some theories have it that the famed “Arthur” was really a female ruler.

But then, this is Dreamland. Not only do I risk Felicity’s life by pointing this out (dragging real information into fantasy discussion means God kills a catgirl), but myth ought to hold at least as much sway as proper truth, if not more.