Amnesty International Condemns Chinese Government for Refusing Accurate Account of Tiananmen Square Protest

Share

Share

Amnesty International Condemns Chinese Government for Refusing Accurate Account of Tiananmen Square Protest

Human Rights Organization Decries Country for Continuing Repression More Than Two Decades Later

Contact: AIUSA media relations, 202-509-8194

(Washington, D.C.)– It’s been 22 years since the People’s Liberation Army fired on peaceful protesters in Beijing and other cities, killing hundreds, if not thousands, of students and other ordinary people who gathered to demand a more open and responsive government.
In the two decades since the harsh crackdown on the unarmed protestors, the Chinese government has deflected any calls for an open and honest accounting of what happened in and around Tiananmen Square on June 3 and 4. What many call a massacre, the Chinese Communist Party now calls a mere “political disturbance.”

This week, China opened up its secret national archives but justified keeping any of the historical documents on Tiananmen Square under wraps, citing concerns over “privacy” and “reputation.”

But the brutal tactics and ensuing crackdown employed by the government to suppress the student-led democracy movement of 1989 are not only history, but a continuing tool used to suppress even the possibility of a challenge to the Communist Party’s monopoly on power. Their use regularly undermines freedoms of expression, association and assembly enshrined in China’s own constitution.

Recently, the government has responded to the popular uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa by intimidating, threatening or detaining anyone it deems a potentially outspoken critic.

Since late February, Amnesty International has documented more than 130 cases of activists, bloggers, lawyers, and others who have been detained by police, subjected to monitoring and intimidation by security forces, or who have disappeared. Some are veterans of the 1989 student democracy movement who have once again found themselves the victims of persecution. Many face vague, potentially catch-all charges of “inciting subversion” used so liberally in the 1989 crackdown. They include:

Chen Wei: Sichuan activist taken away by police on February 20, since charged with “inciting subversion of state power”.

Ding Mao: Also a Sichuan activist, and founder of the Social Democratic Party, denied legal recognition. Police detained Ding Mao on February 19 and he has also been charged with “inciting subversion”.

Li Hai: Police arrested Li Hai on February 26 [where] on suspicion of “provoking trouble” for publicizing the Jasmine Revolution in the Middle East. He is currently under surveillance and awaiting trial. Li Hai was imprisoned in the mid-1990s for “divulging state secrets” after compiling a list of people imprisoned after the 1989 Tiananmen protests.

Wang Lihong: A former doctor, Wang Lihong was placed under surveillance on February 20 and detained the following day. She has been charged with “gathering a crowd to disturb public order”.

The Chinese government increasingly uses the charge of “inciting subversion of state power” to jail critics. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Liu Xiaobo and activist Liu Xianbin, both of whom helped to draft Charter 08, the political manifesto that calls for peaceful political change in China are serving prison sentences of 11 and 10 years respectively for inciting subversion. Both previously served prison time for their role in the 1989 student movement.

Other activists who have recently been charged with inciting subversion include activist Hu Jun and writer Ran Yunfei.

Amnesty International is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning grassroots activist organization with more than 3 million supporters, activists and volunteers in more than 150 countries campaigning for human rights worldwide. The organization investigates and exposes abuses, educates and mobilizes the public, and works to protect people wherever justice, freedom, truth and dignity are denied.