Originally posted by Xcathdra
All this bill is is a reauthorization of the Brady bill, which lapsed under President Bush and was not pursued by Democrats when they held the
government.

Yes this the same law that was in place from 1994 until 2004. So if people who managed to live from1994 till 2004 could come forward and tell us
about those dark years of civil war and FEMA camps it might tell us what will happen if this passed again. Those must have been dark days.

And what happened during those years? Columbine. And no, this is not even close to being the same thing. This is an all out assault on the second
amendment and will lead to an eventual ban of ALL firearms.

Originally posted by MrSpad
If people would lay crazy claims like civil war and present infomation as it is and not full of hyperbole it might help
this credibility of this place.

WTF do you mean help the credibility of this place? ATS is more credible than you are, spouting all that BS. Facts are facts, and ATS does a damn good
job, as a whole, of sorting fact from fiction. So show me the fiction, cause what I have presented, as did Drudge, is reality. They ARE INDEED coming
for your guns.

So civil war is coming? Really? They are coming for my guns? With this law? You know the same one we lived with for ten years 1994 through 2004? I
know gun laws are lighter than ever before but to try and make it seem like this is not something gun owers lived with for 10 years and had not
problems is nothing but, hyperbole and foolishness. That is even if it could get passed. Which is unlikely at best.

Originally posted by Xcathdra
All this bill is is a reauthorization of the Brady bill, which lapsed under President Bush and was not pursued by Democrats when they held the
government.

Yes this the same law that was in place from 1994 until 2004. So if people who managed to live from1994 till 2004 could come forward and tell us
about those dark years of civil war and FEMA camps it might tell us what will happen if this passed again. Those must have been dark days.

And what happened during those years? Columbine. And no, this is not even close to being the same thing. This is an all out assault on the second
amendment and will lead to an eventual ban of ALL firearms.

Yes it is one among thousands of bills that go nowhere every year. This of course being ATS of course that fact is changed to all guns are
banned FEMA camps are being filled on friday. It is like the boy who cried wolf, if anything serious ever does come up it will just be chalked up to
the usual crap that spewed here and ignored. If people would lay crazy claims like civil war and present infomation as it is and not full of hyperbole
it might help this credibility of this place.

Hmmmmm, really? So those of us who are vigilant and bring up points and facts that our government officials are doing make this site crazy? However,
not a peep out of you on an elected official who is openly violating our Constitution...................................????

www.feinstein.senate.gov... link to the pdf and no it does not list
any of the guns by name and that is quite ambiguous and i dont like it at all especially this part

Requires that grandfathered weapons be
registered under the National Firearms Act, to include: o Background check of owner and any transferee; o Type and serial number of the firearm; o
Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint; o Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not
violate State or local law; and o Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration

that i think is gonna be another unforeseen consequence of this IF it passes imagine all the insurance claims on "boating accidents" or "theft" or
simply the amount of misplaced fire arms (like what happened after Canada repealed its long gun ban suddenly guns started popping back into existence)

Can someone give me a scenario where you would need more than 10 rounds in a handgun? (Not Zombies etc) unless you are a crap shot.
I think some of you are relishing the chance of a civil war.....we had doom porn now it's civil war porn...

Originally posted by Xcathdra
All this bill is is a reauthorization of the Brady bill, which lapsed under President Bush and was not pursued by Democrats when they held the
government.

Yes this the same law that was in place from 1994 until 2004. So if people who managed to live from1994 till 2004 could come forward and tell us
about those dark years of civil war and FEMA camps it might tell us what will happen if this passed again. Those must have been dark days.

And what happened during those years? Columbine. And no, this is not even close to being the same thing. This is an all out assault on the second
amendment and will lead to an eventual ban of ALL firearms.

No it is excactly the same law. Word for word.

No, it isn't. Go and read the 1994 law and then re-read that summary and note the differences.

Originally posted by boymonkey74
Can someone give me a scenario where you would need more than 10 rounds in a handgun? (Not Zombies etc) unless you are a crap shot.
I think some of you are relishing the chance of a civil war.....we had doom porn now it's civil war porn...

Originally posted by boymonkey74
Can someone give me a scenario where you would need more than 10 rounds in a handgun? (Not Zombies etc) unless you are a crap shot.
I think some of you are relishing the chance of a civil war.....we had doom porn now it's civil war porn...

When you're attacked by more than one person, for example, or when that person is on drugs. I don't know how many people you've shot, but they
don't just magically fall down and die when you hit them once unless you get really, really lucky.. or they aren't moving and you can actually aim
at their head. In which case, I probably wouldn't mention it.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.