Wracked with angst over the fate of our beloved and horribly misgoverned Republic, the DiploMad returns to do battle on the world wide web, swearing death to political correctness, and pulling no punches.

Featured Post

We live in a time of government by con men, women, and those of flexible and reassignable gender. In the last few days this bitter truth ha...

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Jihadist Savagery in London: Makes You Feel All Warm and Tingly About Muslim Immigration

The jihadist savagery in London today is yet another reminder of the West's charge for the edge of the cliff; as in those faked Disney nature movies, we are lemmings heading for the rocks below. All this because, under the spell of leftist multicultural claptrap, we refuse to see the world as it is, not as the spell casters wish it. That poor 20-year soldier paid with his life because some idiot multiculturalists decided that Britain needed jihadis roaming its streets; that Britain would be a better place by letting in violent stupid fanatics who hate it, draw public assistance, and enjoy freedoms they don't have in their countries of origin.

I want to pay respect to that brave British woman who, it seems from the video footage, stood up to these two Muslim savages and told them, "You are going to lose." I hope those words are prophetic.

Islam's violent ideology poses the problem. We have no need to import the followers of that violent belief into our democratic countries. I have said it over and over and over: Islam is not like any other major religion. It is a hate-filled, resentful, anti-intellectual, anti-woman, and anti-freedom totalitarian ideology that seeks to destroy the West, and has sought to do so for nearly 1500 years. For almost a century we combatted Communism, Fascism, and Nazism, and, in general, had a pretty clear vision of those threats. We certainly did not hand out visas to the advocates of those totalitarian creeds by the bushel as we do with Muslim immigrants.

Insanity kills. Multicultural insanity killed a young man on the streets of London today.

37 comments:

Some people (Obama being one of them) likes to remind us that we cannot cast blame on the followers of Islam based solely on the actions of a few. I reject that. Until all of those so called peace loving Muslims deal with the savage animals in their midst they are simply part of the herd.The fact that followers of Islam are not out in front with outrage reaffirms that it is not religion but as you correctly say an ideology. They are in a word, evil. They are evil in their actions as well as inaction. And we should not forget that they are people who Obama bows down to.

"kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush."

Sura 9:5

There is no "moderate" Islam. Read the Koran and this will become blatantly apparent. There is no common ground between Christianity and Islam.

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled."

Sura 9:29

It is us or them. The Koran commands Muslims to act in the manner of those beasts that hacked the British soldier to death. There is no common ground.

Bad business Mr. Mad, bad business. It may be the jihadis have decided nows the time to come after us openly and at home. What do people expect of a religion that was carried by the sword for centuries and only subsided when faced by superior military prowess?

And the dominant religion in the West is an arrogant, self-righteous, historically ignorant me-firstism. My guess is that it will continue to be a walk for those folks who've never produced anything other than a slum surrounded by desert without the help of a sufficient number of Dhimmi.

When those who love the seat of the scornful and counsel of the ungodly (Psalm 1:1) attack a religion, it's Christianity. To Islam they are ever deferential. In Maryland, the custody case of Hosein v. Malik saw Sharia applied over the best interests of the child standard that had long prevailed, simply so some silly old ninny in a robe could appear to be "open minded" (so open-minded his brains fell out of his head).

But it's worse. Now that we've given the gummental imprimatur to homosexual "marriage", it will be impossible to say no to the immigration of polygamous Muslim households. In Britain, these have been an enormous drain on the welfare system, among other things. The unwillingness to demand that the Muslim immigrants behave has turned Malmo, Sweden, into the rape capital of Europe--and virtually all are committed by "Middle Eastern" (and I don't mean Armenian, Copt, Maronite, Assyrian, Zoroastrian, Swarthy Evangelical, or Mizrahi) yoots.

I hope those women who told the killers that they'd lose were prophetic, too. But we need a sea change in Western culture and politics for it to be so.

Ah Kepha, I love what you say, and how you say it. Truly. Excellent. BTW, like the youts touch! Big smile, and he won his legal case too."But we need a sea change in Western culture and politics for it to be so" Revolutionary sea change, see my entry on "Best advice yet about the solution to whole problem: http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/uk-muslim-terrorist-on-london-streets-you-people-will-never-be-safe/ "

And more too, necessary wars must not be fought with hands tied, by our warriors.., and must be fought to win, intelligently, in a manner the enemy will understand, and respect. The enemy understood Vlad Tepes, Martel, Sobieski, et al, and yielded.

Jihadis are the foot-soldiers. They seemingly do not have a command structure. With that lack of structure there is a void, a vacuum, if you will. They create chaos... CRISIS. Someone or some ideology will be needed to fill that void.

Like the Shinto religion, circa 1945, they must be forced to accept a separation between government, and religion.

I not Dip, but for brevity, I may remind, that islam is all wrapped into one, absolutely no void to fill. It is all wrapped into one, command, structure, laws, religion(not)politics, at the very top is clerics, and the rest all is answering to the clerics, complete and total, right down to when men should have sex and how and how to wipe yourself on the toilet and how to go to the toilet. I mean literally tightly covered and controlled, top to bottom.

When you study deeply all of islam, you see revealed the most pagan, barbaric, evil, and complete system for living as a perfect criminal, under satan, that is unimaginable. You owe it to yourself to see my other entry, and to go study under Jihadwatch.com, and others, to see the totallity of evil all of us are facing. And I mean all of us, including many muslims, whom they kill plenty as well, because they do not believe in each others beliefs and the correction is always death, no matter which set of beliefs, and there are dozens of split off sects, beyond the two big ones, sunni, shia. That's why is is called a death cult, under satan as evil. It is essentially a "spiritual nazism", as someone else said today, if you need a quick concept, perspective to wrap around.Jack

Well, this is my go at it, the Woolrich barbarac pagan sunnah style butchery. Just a part of the long mahoundian war, of 632CE onward. Best factual coverage yet: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d0f_1369235265

Best advice yet about the solution to whole problem: http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/uk-muslim-terrorist-on-london-streets-you-people-will-never-be-safe/

Without doing above, and operating deprogamming centers for any who remain, it will eventually be Afghan, Paki, and Bangladesh, and India blood in the streets, daily, at the least, in time. Just more muslim rape, pillage, and raiding from the old days, brought into today.

And, to review history of islam's eternal war, validly, go to a beautiful lecture; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y and here for America's first being attacked by mahoundians; http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=4574

Please believe me, I understand all that. Yes, it is evil. But this evil can only operate where there is a vacuum: The mullahs fill that void. The mullahs take political power from the religion. Before Nazi-ism surfaced they were pretty much pirates and assorted other thieves who could steal with impunity from non-believers. Some would say we have been at war with these cretins since the Khobar Towers, or the first World Trade bombing, or (hold on to your tin hat) even the Oklahoma bombing. When actually, you could go back as far as the USS Philadelphia. Whichever, it doesn't matter. The current crop is feeling frisky enough to take on the most powerful country the world has ever seen. What gives them the idea that they could possibly succeed? Liberalism. Liberalism is their protection, in return they create the 'crisis' that liberalism needs to thrive. (See Rules for Radicals) Once the liberals (Read: Communists) are done with them they will all be lined up and shot. That's how Communists work. (See Yuri Besmanov: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fQoGMtE0EY )

Thus, the real evil is the liberalism that supports Islam, although it is a symbiotic relationship, for now.

Until we are prepared as a society to kill every last one of them, or at least as many as it takes to get the point across, we will never be rid of this scourge. We first must rid ourselves of that other scourge: the liberalism that enables them.

Phew, that's a relief. Principle is right on, give or take a couple phrases. Commies and nazis and others did the ssme, of lining up the early ones, like the brown shirts and murdered them. However, this one is slightly different, being a marxist, radical socialist MUSLIM. A sunni whahabi by sympathy, to be pretty specific. He is on the side of muslims, period.

Vacuum is to me perhaps a lack of God, a belief, a faith in the success of good, a belief in a figure of exemplary value, that echoes the best that humanity can aspire too, and provide a rich image of goodness to emulate, or try to, given how short of such, most of us, including me, manage to not well emulate.

Liberalism is essentially Godless, a self conained spirit of universalism, a stunning naivette on life as the simplistic life as it ought to be by man's imagination-a kind of co-conspirator of atheism.

"Until we are prepared as a society to kill every last one of them, or at least as many as it takes to get the point across, we will never be rid of this scourge" This is plain correct, i and many believe, although, it is hoped we will find a way, that we will not have to resort to that, which is historically all they are programmed to respond to. They exist as a scourge to humankind, as more a kind of software of the mind, viral program infection, a kind of Stuxnet of the mind, that makes them zombies under the control of ala programming. Much more than the medical virus infection model (I'm intimately familiar with both models).

I don't know about the last sentence, liberalism enabling. But watching the people of Jesse Waters World on OReily, who are the very bottom of the pyramid of information that we here, happen to be on the top of, as high info people, the gap seems awfully wide at the moment. Time and circumstance to come, which I'm certain of, hopefully will change that, sooner than later.Jack

Interesting that you speak of a lack of God. I'm also of the mind that the crisis is ultimately theological.

One of the big things about Islam is that it tries to fob off its Qur'an as an adequate replacement for the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments, on the grounds that the People of the Book corrupted the Bible (with no answer for why Jews and Christians quarrel over the same Tanakh and the various sects of Christians have the same 27 books of the New Testament).

Christianity, in contrast, has never excused itself from reading the Old Testament (the source of so much in Christian ethics and devotion!). Hence, it knows the Babylonian Exile and the hazards of divine election (I come from the Reformed, or "Calvinist" tradition). Islam expects only triumph and goes into an insane rage when it has neither triumph nor the firm hand of a Kufr conqueror.

I suspect that it's somewhat the same for the Left--Marx's prophetic-Augustinian view of a history progressing somewhere--with the disruption of its triumphant march by the Reagan-Thatcher Revolution.

As another Calvinist, I see the war within the former mainline churches as a related front. Liberal christianity has been a subversive force for 100 years. It claims there are no fundamentals that must be believed. Orthodox christians, who agree to the words of the Apostles creed represent true Christianity. Much of our problems stem from allowing heresy to pervert true faith.

I now realize to my horror I have more in common with a Mormon who believes Jesus died on the cross, than a Presbyterian who thinks the only gospel is a social one, and it does not matter if Jesus died, or rose from the dead. A local Presbytery approved a minister for a church who admitted he did not believe in the resurrection. Liberal christians who think faith is only doing the "right" things, and Jesus was just a nice guy who taught good things, are closer to islam than they are to orthodox Christians of any denomination.

Ha. While not raised Presby we have been attending members of our local Presby church for 15 years. We are orthodox Christians if you will and is the vast majority of the congregation. Things have rather come to a head because key people in the session and general membership are in total agreement with the filth coming out of the GA. We have decided that we are going to seek to worship elsewhere. The congregation as a whole is not even biblically astute enough to realize that the national group is apostate and why it matters. They figure as long as things are good on the ground here it matters not what they do at the national level. We have been fighting this for about 18 months and the end is not even remotely in sight. Many, not all, of the elders on the current session by and large think the fuss is much ado about nothing and see no reason for any action. Sigh.

Wow, Jib, that's pretty sad. Meanwhile here in Puget Sound country, among the fairly evangelical churches in a fairly evangelical corner of the PCUSA, a number of the larger churches have left for more hospitable associations, and those (like ours) that have stayed for now are active in The Fellowship. Sorry to hear it's not like that where you are; best wishes as you search for the right place for you.

Yea it is sad. My church has also joined the Fellowship but that still leaves a back door open to the garbage coming out of the GA imo. A recent poll regarding a recent sermon on Romans 1 shows that 80% of those responding think the sermon was spot on and we need moer of that, 16% of those responding thought the sermon was either too judgmental or (the larger part) that the intpretation of the passage was wrong. 4% were non committal. Wish the all of the 80% understood why the PCUSA is not a good thing. Well we shall see. GA 2014 ought to be interesting given what I just read at the laymen online.

"This is plain correct, i and many believe, although, it is hoped we will find a way, that we will not have to resort to that, which is historically all they are programmed to respond to. " -Jack

That is why I made reference to Shinto circa 1945. This isn't the first time we have had to deal with zombies that would die for their religion and their god, (Hirohito). That didn't end well for them. It took nuclear arms to end the war and still there were some that wanted to sharpen sticks for the children to use during the inevitable invasion. MacArthur separated religion from politics after the war. The same needs to be done with sharia or we will be faced with the same decision.

As for Obama being a Muslim, I don't necessarily believe that. Although he is reported to have said “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” and when asked by ABC news about people questioning his faith, "...my Muslim faith." (Corrected by thew interviewer.) But I think the guy drinks the RED kool-aide. Which means he doesn't believe in God. Well, a god other than himself.

I think the connection between leftism and Islamism was apparent when Hugo Chavez and Imadinnerjacket were playing kissy-face in Teheran.

He was raised first as a muslim, went to mosk, never has renounced the shahada, much less islam, attended an anti Christian hate church of Wright for 20 years, who reportedly was a muslim before being a hate preacher, non Christian IMO. He has done the islam apology tour, did the ABC interview saying my muslim faith, supports muslims in every manner, has removed all traces of islam in all training manuals, and practices of military, and security agencies, etc. and more. Including praising much of islam, and speaking perfect arab, of the clerics. And much much more examples of his behavior. And all his paperwork sealed, no one has come forth with it yet, and his official documents are totally up to many questions, to boot. Only his musselmanism is clear.

When someone is a crass liar, you tell what they are by their works and by the company they keep. He is a muslim by any measure. And a radical socialist, marxist, and not as bright as billed, by half. He is not a Jew, he is not a Christian, he could have been a lapsed muslim for a time, but not anymore, that is clear. He is a full blown muslim.

However, everyone haa a right to their own opinion, or beliefs, except when their belief says they must kill or maim or otherwise hurt me, or everyone else, just to please or fulfill their crazy imaginary god's command, especially to have sex with over 72 virgins in a whorehouse, plus all the other BS they are stupid enough to get suckered into.

Until I see hussein renounce the shahada, and islam, he is a muslim. Lan astaslem!! I'd say more, but you know, time, space, and not my blog!!!Jack

I'm also of the mind that these United States are now headed by a person with a very insecure identity. However, I do not think he is a child of Islam.

Barry Soetero shows no indication that he knows anything about Islamic doctrine (less than someone with a good college comparative religions course, for example); and as for his Indonesian childhood, he does not seem to have learned a word of that language (for the learning of which the State Department will not give you language incentive pay, indicating it's apparently not all that hard). Being a "Muslim" child in Indonesia at that time seems to me an insecure kid's attempt to fit in.

I think the O is what the Silly 'Sixties is imposing on us. He is a boy who scarcely knew a real father and he apparently had a real flake for a mother. He swore fealty to the idea of being black, but the people who raised him were white.

And, perhaps, this POTUS putting more energy into golf (a gentleman's game; something that a kid from the outside might aspire to having, like a Porsche or a mansion) is a blessing in disguise for us. If the O really tried to govern, we'd be in a much bigger mess.

Upon reflection one must come to proper reason. They only murdered a commoner. We should not forget the value of a commoner's life in Britain is so low they are not worth the allowance of defensive carriage of a firearm for self-protection.

Europe's elite and well-bred know full well that commoners will be murdered by the occasional Jihadi. Better the commoner remained disarmed and denied the opportunity for lethal force on behalf of self-protection. There is the greater good that must be preserved by their forced defenselessness.

What is most important? That commoners remain at their proper place and station in society; disarmed and submissive; obedient to their betters and official members of the government family.

And more, British royals need to learn their own places, which is anti islam, not pro. Same applies with the commoner's government, starting, surprize, with Cameron, who is a Class A dimwit dummy of the first order, witless and witness this, and many other sites: http://sheikyermami.com/2012/08/25/david-cameron-wants-british-people-to-integrate-more-with-the-muslim-way-of-life/Jack

Ecce ego, et me, et venio. "I think the O is what the Silly 'Sixties is imposing on us", Yep what that (my) generation has been desperate for to fill that hole in their soul they've carried around since the 60's. I also don't think Obama is a crypto Islamist. Instead he's a production of time and circumstance being used by 60's generation to carry out long held dreams. What they can't see is someone using THEM! For O has only one idol to worship and no other.

Without getting into the whole 'lying to the kafir is ok' argument, I think we can all agree that a person either is a Muslim or he is not. There are no shades of grey. They kill apostates. Was his father a Muslim? My guess is we will never know. We do know Vernon Jarret, Valerie Jarrett's father-in-law, wrote that the Saudis were going to finance the Black Panthers and others to spread Islam to the states. ( http://www.dailyinterlake.com/opinion/columns/frank/article_7924e4f0-0468-11e2-8da2-0019bb2963f4.html#user-comment-area ) we know that Dr. James E. Bowman, a Tuskegee airman and Valerie Jarrett's father, worked in Iran after the war and discovered:

"Favism fit with Bowman’s lifelong focus on inherited blood diseases and led to a series of important discoveries about the genetics of these diseases and the populations they affect, especially in the Middle East, Africa and America. It enabled him to travel all over the world collecting blood samples for DNA testing. It also led to frequent contacts and collaborations with University of Chicago researchers, who had first described the enzyme deficiency (Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, or G6PD) and its connection with antimalarial medications."

Yes, that University of Chicago hospital where Michelle Obama also worked, albeit a no-show job.

The Tuskegee airmen painted the tails of their planes RED. The Tuskegee Institute where the airmen were trained was a communist hotbed. Many southern blacks served in the Spanish Civil War on the side of the communists.

We know the housing project in Chicago, Robert Taylor Homes, was named for Robert Rochon Taylor, a civic leader and former Chairman of the Chicago Housing Authority. Taylor's granddaughter, Valerie Jarrett, is a Senior Advisor to President Barack Obama.Robert Rochon Taylor's father was the architect of the 'project' as well as the Tuskegee Institute.

Now, just to cross-pollinate this, Stanley Dunham, (Gramps) has a sister Virginia. Her daughter married a Saudi:

Virginia [Dunham] and Cecil met at the Boeing plant in Kansas. The two married in Wellington and had three children: One child died at the age of three and a half to cancer. That left daughter Debi, known as Laya,” and son, Kevin. Cecil and Virginia moved to Arkansas with Cecil job after the children had finished school. The Goeldners’ describe Debi as an honor student who attended the same college that her grandfather did in Lawrence, KS.

A linguistics major, Debi worked as a professor at the college in Lawrence, teaching foreign students English. “One of the students Debi taught became her husband, an Engineering student from Saudi Arabia on scholarship. He graduated a year before she did,” Virginia said. “Debi’s main emphasis was the Arabic language. She moved to Saudi Arabia with her husband after graduation, where she lives today with their five children.

Her husband, Abdullah Al-Ahmadi is a Civil Engineer and a manager with Saudi Aramco.

See photos here: http://rottie-refugees.com/2013/04/22/family-ties/

The picture becomes clearer once you see the relationship between the communists and the Islamists. They both wish to spread their ideology and they are not mutually exclusive. Communists harbor no hated for Islam because it fits their belief system- the same is true for Islamists. It's a match made in....hell.

As the mother of one serving down range today my blood curdled as I read that the Prez is planning on turning out hard core jihadis back to Yemen and AFGHANISTAN! That is a disaster and will result in more deaths.Is serving over there not dangerous enough?????Enough....of this man, his REGIME and his henchmen who dirty everyone's family and intrude into all American's. Enough. Congress has no ability, it seems, to do one single thing. They are as bad as this regime.Hot, tired, and angry.......ETR

ETRPrayers for you and yours. Can't imagine how frustrating and scary this must be for all the military families. Those poor Border Patrol guys if on lower levels don't fare well at the hands of the adniminstration either. Thank those if your family who have served and are currently serving on behalf of my husband and myself. We are ever grateful.

And the British response is to tell their soldiers not to wear uniforms in public. Not imprison every radical. Not deport the Clerics who preach this hatred. But to diminish the Pride of the soldier who defends his Nation.Britain is a lost cause.

Do your homework, boys and girls. Learn exactly what Islam is and how it came about. The Muslims will talk about Mohammed's army, but it really wasn't an army. Mostly, the army were bands of thugs roaming the region, killing those who would not bend down to Mohammed, sacking the cities and giving Mohammed a cut of the take, much like Mafia henchmen paid to the Godfathers. It was decades later that the Islamic hoards crossed over into Europe, taking Spain, Turkey etc.

Do your homework. Understand that each action is symbolic. Ever ask yourself why ObL chose Sept. 11? It was 1683. The Muslim hoards had marched across Europe, sacking and killing as they went. But some Westerners decided to stop them, or die trying. They took a stand at the Gates of Vienna, where the Muslim hoards were dessimated, and defeated. That was on September 11th in the year 1683. Osama bin Laden simply reinstated a centuries old war.

Now we are allowing the same radical Islamists to enter our nation, obviously with no questions asked by this Administration. Add to that number, the Pan American communists/socialist infiltrating our nation from countries south of the border.

I think that Leftists feel that they are superior and that they are the natural owners of the world. Like us all, they see problems and conflicts. Their solution is to put themselves into power to control the populace and end the problems.

They plan to impose the proper ideas and correct bad thinking. They don't restrict themselves to the truth while doing this. They assume that people don't think well enough to direct their own lives. So, they don't try to persuade people in an intellectual way. Their arguments are more like advertising slogans, working on the assumptions of their audience and taking advantage of flawed thinking.

It is impossible to have an informed discussion with a Lefty, because their "facts" are chosen to be persuasive, not because they are true. They will never admit an incorrect fact, because persuasion is more important than the truth. They will change the discussion to another fact when pressed on the truth of a first fact.

They see autocratic societies as half-way to the goal of imposing good rule, regardless of any anti-liberal policies of that society. Control first, good policies second.

So, they defend the right of a society to be autocratic. They admire Muslim societies because of the autocratic control, despite some lack of freedom. They assume they will have a preferred position, and will not be subject to the objectionable parts of autocratic control.

They cater to Muslims within our society because they are the ideal, subservient citizens of the New Autocratic Order.

Thank You for above information this is very useful for UK immigration and i have also some information for share about UK immigration visa. Global Migrate is the leading consultant company which provide best information about ilr visa.http://global-migrate.com/uk-immigration-visa.html

About Me

W. Lewis Amselem, long time US Foreign Service Officer; now retired; served all over the world and under all sorts of conditions. Convinced the State Department needs to be drastically slashed and reformed so that it will no longer pose a threat to the national interests of the United States.