Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
> OK, I feel like trying this one (call me stupid if you will).
>>> Thanks for your info, this is very helpful.
>>>> So until end 2007 the core2 annihilates any opteron system.
>> No!!!!!!!!! This may be true for your application, but it's not
> true for all applications. I have a couple of applications where
> a 2.6 GHz Opteron with beat a 3.0 GHz Woodcrest.
>> Another example is Fluent, where a 3.0 GHz Woodcrest kills
> the Opteron on a single node or a small number of nodes.
> But as you increase the number of nodes, the Opteron is faster
> than the Woodcrest.
Why is this? Is it the interconnect, PCI-E implementation,
maybe cache effects?
Craig
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
>http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf>
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf