Latest

Featured Shows

Weekday

Weekend

Museum visitors study "Adele Bloch-Bauer I," a 1907 painting by Austrian artist Gustav Klimt at the Los Angeles County Museum in 2006. Los Angeles resident Maria Altmann won the return of the paintings from the Austrian government following a lengthy legal dispute over the rightful ownership of the paintings.

Photo by Chris Pizzello/Reuters

The last prisoners of war: Inside the battle to recover Nazi-stolen artwork

In 2006, I was very fortunate to win an eight-year legal battle to recover five Gustav Klimt paintings taken by the Nazis, which is the basis for the film “Woman in Gold,” opening today. (Ryan Reynolds plays me in the film, and Helen Mirren plays my client, Maria Altmann.)

At the screenings I have attended, I have been repeatedly asked whether there are still other paintings yet to be returned to their rightful owners. The answer is, unfortunately, yes. Below are just three of the cases I have worked on.

Adam and Eve, Lucas Cranach the Elder (1528)

If you ever watched the opening sequence for “Desperate Housewives,” then you’ve seen the diptych “Adam” and “Eve,” by the famed German artist Lucas Cranach the Elder, which presently hang in the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, California. These two paintings were owned by a Dutch Jewish art dealer named Jacques Goudstikker, who fled with his wife and young son as the Nazis invaded the Netherlands in 1940.

This image provided by the Norton Simon Art Foundation shows the diptch entitled, “Adam and Eve,” by artist, Lucas Cranach the Elder.

Norton Simon Art Foundation/AP

Sadly, Jacques died in a shipboard accident while the family was crossing the Atlantic. His entire art collection was seized by the Nazis, and “Adam” and “Eve” were ultimately taken by Hermann Göring, the number two Nazi after Adolf Hitler.

Some of Jacques’ paintings were recovered by the Allies at war’s end by the so-called Monuments Men (portrayed in George Clooney’s film) and dutifully returned to the Netherlands. But the Netherlands failed to return them to Jacques’ surviving family.

In, 2006, the Dutch Government finally returned the works to Jacques’ sole surviving heir, after determining that the family had been treated unfairly after the war. Unfortunately, “Adam” and “Eve” were not returned, because the Dutch Government in 1966 improperly sold them to George Stroganoff-Scherbatoff. Stroganoff later sold the paintings to foundations associated with the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena.

Rather than return these paintings, which the Norton Simon Museum does not dispute were looted by the Nazis, the museum has spent years in litigation posing procedural objections instead of doing the right thing and returning the paintings to their rightful owners. Last year, one of Norton Simon’s grandsons also called for a “just and fair solution” to the case.

Portrait of Amalie Zuckerkandl, Gustav Klimt (unfinished, 1918)

In the film “Woman in Gold,” Helen Mirren (playing Maria Altmann) stops to marvel at this painting hanging in the Belvedere Gallery in Vienna, noting sternly that Amalie was murdered by the Nazis. What the film doesn’t mention is that this painting hung until 1938 in the bedroom of Maria’s uncle, Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer. Ferdinand fled when the Nazis invaded Austria in the infamous Anschluss of March 1938, and died in exile in Switzerland in 1945, shortly after the war ended. By that time the painting had made its way into the hands of an Austrian art dealer, who ultimately donated it to the Belvedere when she died in 2001.

Portrait of Amalie Zuckerkandl by Gustav Klimt

Imagno/Getty

Rather than return this obviously looted painting, an Austrian arbitration panel concluded that it should stay in the Belvedere. The arbitrators said they were not certain exactly how the painting left Ferdinand’s home, and believed (despite a mountain of evidence concerning the Nazi liquidation of Ferdinand’s entire estate) that Ferdinand might have decided to give the painting to Amalie’s family. How this could have been accomplished while Ferdinand was in exile, the arbitrators did not explain.

The panel refused to apply long-standing Austrian restitution laws, finding that a newer art restitution law enacted in 1998 did not incorporate them. The Austrian Supreme Court upheld the decision, finding that the arbitrators’ construction of the law was “plausible.” However, Austria’s art restitution advisory board has since clarified that the old restitution laws should continue to be applied. And yet, so far the Austrians have refused to reconsider the case. The looted “Portrait of Amalie Zuckerkandl” continues to hang in the Belvedere to this day.

Artist in his Studio, Johannes Vermeer (circa 1665-1668)

This famous Vermeer, which currently holds pride of place in Austria’s Art History Museum (Kunsthistorisches Museum), was long owned by the aristocratic Czernin family in Austria. Jaromir Czernin was trying to get permission to sell it abroad when the Nazis invaded. Although not Jewish himself, Czernin was married to a woman with Jewish background (a descendant of the Oppenheim banking family), and his sister was married to deposed Austrian chancellor Kurt Schuschnigg, who had opposed Hitler and was imprisoned in Sachsenhausen concentration camp.

In 1939, Czernin’s proposed sale of the painting to a friend of Hermann Göring was quashed by Hitler, who nine months later purchased it for himself for a signifanctly lower price. Hitler’s agent, Hans Posse, told Czernin that Hitler would get the painting “one way or another,” and so Czernin felt he had no choice.

The Artist in His Studio by Johannes Vermeer

DeAgostini/Getty

Just days earlier, the Gestapo had declared his wife “Jewish and an enemy of the state.” Earlier in the year, the Nazis had interfered in her child custody case with her former husband, arguing that she was an unfit mother because she was Jewish. Even following the sale, Czernin was imprisoned by the Nazis and lost his entire estate. After the war, Austria nationalized the painting and placed it in the museum. The authorities rejected Czernin’s claim for restitution, finding that he had not been under any duress.

The claim was reviewed again by the Austrian art restitution board in 2011 and rejected on the grounds that Czernin’s wife was only one quarter Jewish and therefore should not have been persecuted by the Nazis. Once again, the great value of the painting had blinded the authorities to the indisputable facts of the case.

These few cases are of course not the only ones. Thousands of important artworks still remain to be located and recovered. Millions of Jews lost their lives and property in the Holocaust, and so it is not surprising that in the immediate aftermath of the war, the recovery of valuable artworks was not the first order of business.

And yet, seventy years later, this is one of the few areas where we can still correct the wrongs of the past and provide families with a certain amount of restitution. I was very fortunate that I was able to recover the paintings once owned by Maria Altmann’s family, including two portraits of her aunt, Adele Bloch-Bauer. Many others have been less fortunate, and still struggle with seemingly endless roadblocks and obstacles to recovery set forth by people who value the artworks more than they value justice. It is time for these last prisoners of war to be returned.

Randy Schoenberg, whose life is part of the focus of the new film “Woman in Gold,” is a Los Angeles-based attorney and President of the Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust.