Top Opinion

The President swears to "preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution. Giving up our sovereignty is an aid and comfort to the enemy. And using this new treaty to take our guns away is an act of war against the people. Those are the definitions of treason.

"Over the last 10 years law-abiding citizens have been stripped of their right to own some or all types of firearms in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and New Zealand among others. New regional and international agreements have been made by governments of various countries in which civilian possession and sales of other types of firearms are to be restricted, registered, or completely prohibited."

This was all accomplished by? "Progressives".
They did it by way of "international agreements"

What are we facing now? "international agreements"

I don't want to see Americans take up arms, I just want to see them vote Progressives out of office instead.

Only if the government does. Take Obamacare for instance, The Court admitted that the measure was unconstitutional, and the liberal with the help of one turncoat, made it a Tax which saved the unconstitutional Obamacare barnicial. However, the Constitution states in Article 1; Section 7; "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives;"

Therefore, Roberts supported a crime because the Supreme Court cannot pass Bills for raising Revenue, which includes taxes of any kind. He oversteped his bounds, and did the liberals a service by further weaking the Constitution. And while we are at it, consider Article 4; "Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"

Obama, of late, AND the Congress, for decades now, is a epic fail in this article and section.

The attempt is being made to circumvent the US Constitution by signing a treaty that will relinquish our right to bear arms. The Senate must ratify this and it must be done by a Super majority if I am correct. This should be a wake up call to ALL of us to rid ourselves of Progressives in ur government before they sell us down the river of tyrrany!

Oh yes, Lee. What a wonderful world it would be be if no matter what any of us do we all have the same income. Better still, let us all have the same kind of house, the same amount of children, drive the same car, Let's all have the same hobbies too. Oh! I know! Let's all be the same color, speak the same language and have the same dreams. We'll have to have a good dictator to lead us on our journey.

Yeah, say that when you can't have a gun for protection. This is no distraction, it's taking away one of your rights. If you are that out of touch with the real reasons behind this, then you are part of the problem here.

Learn how to use the simple slingshot. A good aim will crack a "face mask" and then some. They will not know what hit them the 1st time. It is all a matter of getting under of all that Armour ...That stuff makes them slow and dependent on firepower. .......... Like the old Vietnamese "Gorilla" tactics. Take the firepower and ........ well, you know........Just a suggestion concerning a fantasy day that will never come.

Sure! That's what I want! I want to become poor and dependent, rather than a industrious middle class American. Do you ever realize how utterly ridiculous your statements are since most "right wing" people are middle class?!

It's a stealth way of getting around our Constitutional rights. When Progressives in England and Australia have ban the rights to bare arms and Liberal Democrats here in the United States sign a treaty like this, WATCH OUT!
This is entirely a back door maneuver. By signing this treaty, it will forbid businesses and citizens to sell guns over seas. People don't realize that it is the Government that sells arms to other nations. This includes hand guns, rifles and machine guns. Our Government buys them from private companies. Once they do this, the Government is responsible for them, not the citizens.
With this treaty, it will be left to every nation, including the United States to develop a national registry for fire arms. What Obama and Hillary Clinton are out to do, is round up every gun on paper so that the Federal Government knows of every gun you own. There for, when the times comes, the Government will say, hand em over. Be careful folks. This treaty in it self is not to take away your guns tomorrow, but it is clearly the foot work to do it in the future.

He is already guilty of treason. I have come to realize the only safe guard against a president who is a traitor is we the people. There is no law, no branch of the government, no judge, attorney, policeman, nobody in the military, absolutely no person or entity which protects us from this. We're on our own. Just We The People.

You've moved past gullible directly to stupid if you actually buy into this.

The right to keep and bear arms is guaranteed in the Constitution. In 1957 the Supreme court decision in Reid vs Covert established that the Constitution supersedes any International treaty, even one ratified by a two thirds majority in the Senate.

There is no "legal way around the second amendment" other than a new amendment to the Constitution or a new Supreme ct. decision that radically reinterprets how the second amendment is applied.

You mean the time the Supreme Court ruled that the mandate in the ACA law was indeed Constitutional?

I love it when you tea party types keep bragging about how you know more about the many complexities and nuances of our Constitution than our Constitutional scholar/professor president and five Supreme court justices...you guys kill me. I bet you probably carry around a pocket sized version like Larry the Cable guy.

SC said the mandate is unconstitutional. Roberts said for it to stand it had to be a tax. Well, duh, Bubba what do you think Obama is peeing in his pants about now? He's ticked that it is on the books as a tax. Repeal is only a simple majority away.

You're right and what does that have anything to do with the price of tea in china? the treaty deals in the trafficking of military arms, not individual weapons purchased by citizens. the ONLY country that wanted the tracking of individual weapons was Norway. Still practicing smoke screens on your side of the fence I see.