Monday, April 20, 2015

Sunday, April 12, 2015

We don't put up much on 9/11 theses days because there are not that many in the alternative media we trust but Randy Maugans is an exception. Here he interviews flight attendant Rebekah Roth on her book Methodical Illusion, a novel that addresses the problems with the hijacker scenario. Worth a listen.

Friday, April 03, 2015

Documentary by Edmund Matthews. It would make a lot of sense given it's all about keeping us in fear and certainly those drills in school accomplished nothing but putting the fear of nuclear destruction in our receptive little skulls. Here's a comment about the science of nuclear weapons in regards to another poster stating that if weapons are a hoax then so are nuclear reactors.

Incorrect. Nuclear reactors work. Nuclear bombs are a hoax because the notion of "critical mass" or an exponentially growing fission reaction is not achievable.
If you know your nukes then you would observe that little boy supposedly worked merely by colliding two sub-critical masses of U-235 together. In other words, the propaganda is suggesting that merely by having a certain mass of U-235 in one place will spontaneously create an uncontrolled explosion. This is false and as evidence you can witness the Fukushima meltdowns where massive piles of fissile material still react to this day but obviously have not resulted in any huge nuclear explosions.
The other false premise, as seen in Fat Boy using Pu-239, is that by compressing a sub-critical mass using perfectly timed implosion you can reduce the distance between nuclei and achieve an exponential fission reaction. This is nonsense since as you may or may not have been taught in school; metal is nearly impossible to compress due to the extreme electromagnetic repulsion of electrons and protons. And as also stated in the video; the first testing of the trigger device failed to simultaneously trigger all lenses in the same instant. Even if it could trigger instantaneously, it still would not compress solid plutonium much more than a fraction of a micrometer.

Atomic bombs are a complete hoax, therefore any question oftheir morality is a non-sequitur.

The huge mushroom cloud you see is thecarbonized residue of hundreds if not thousands of tons of Trinitrotoluenewhich has a chemical structure of C6H2(NO2)3CH. As with all forms of combustionand the resulting carbonized residue left over, a hydrocarbon is required toreact with atmospheric oxygen. The distinct lack of oxygen in the immediateatmosphere to instantaneously react with such a large quantity of TnT is theprime reason so much dark smoke rises so high and burns for so long. Thisprocess is similar to the black smoke from a propane kitchen stove with the airvent closed or the heavy exhaust from generators with choke on.

Atomic fission releases energy primarily in the form of pureheat, without any residue. Because of this fact, many conspiracy nuts (whobelieve in the existence of such a 'weapon' merely on the premise of televisionand newspapers) have turned to the faulty logic that all the"impurities" in the atmosphere and surrounding area are the cause ofthe black smoke. This is an unfounded and rather weak argument since theseexplosions have been done in barren deserts without very much carbon or organiccompounds to begin with. One conspiracy nut went as far as to propose that thepaint coating on the bomb and electrical components were the cause of all thesmoke. l.o.l.

If you take lightning as an example, it heats the atmosphereto 54,000 degrees Fahrenheit which is about 10 times hotter than the surface ofthe sun. But you never see black smoke left in the sky afterwards do you? Heatof such magnitude excites the air to the stage of plasma, thus illuminating thesky. Plasma has a very distinct look and lighting effect. Thus if there weresuch a thing as the atom bomb it would be a brief yet intense flash of heatwith a rather beautiful blue or purple glowing effect (from excited nitrogen).What you see in these videos (taken questionably at night to enhance thelightning effects of the TnT no doubt) are typically orange or yellow flashes.These are the most obvious and immediate answers to your moral dilemma (and nodoubt the moral dilemma of many others as well). But there are indeed many morefacets that unfortunately need to be addressed because people have learned tostop thinking for themselves a long, long time ago.For instance, Hiroshima and Nagasaki has long been touted asabsolute evidence of an atomic explosion. After all, look at all thedestruction. But in fact, it looks exactly like Tokyo after it had beenfirebombed. Major Alexander P. de Seversky said, after visiting Hiroshima in1945, that:

"In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically differentsights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the otherburned-out cities in Japan. It was obvious that the blast could not have beenso powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather thanintensive.I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedentedheat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more,topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raidprecaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.At the T-bridge, theaiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the "bald spot" whereeverything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn'tthere or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama orOsaka, or the Tokyo suburbs - the familiar residue of an area of wood and brickhouses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred andleafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intenseenough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava- just as in other Japanese cities..."Of course the notion of human bodies "instantlyvaporizing" is absolute nonsense.The photos of the mushroom cloud over ground zero also showsigns of tampering, namely the same fore-image with different backgrounds seenin two different photos.

The flash burns and burn marks of clothes designs being"imbedded" in people skin is a common effect of incendiary explosions.

As for Wilfred Burchett's sensational "AtomicPlague", I am sure in the history of the world a journalist has never onceexaggerated in his entire life to become famous. Here it is an excellent timeto point out that the people of the world would believe that the United StatesGovernment is capable of outright lying and covering up radioactive fallout andyet somehow incapable of staging the entire hoax to begin with. Hypocrisy, orlaziness? It should be known that the locals originally thought that the bombsdropped contained a poisonous gas. Burchett claimed it smelled something likeSulphur but unlike anything he ever smelled. Sounds like a sensationalreference to Brimstone of the Bible. He then, after being exposed to thisconcentrated Atomic Plague gas, went on to live a luxurious life for another 38years. I smell something but it isn't sulphur.

So in conclusion, there is no moral issue surroundingnuclear weapons because they simply don't exist. Hurray! This is great news foreveryone. You should be jumping up and down with joy. It has been a hoax usedto create fear and with that fear, control. Nothing more. The government lies.People lie. It's obviously TNT being exploded.