Accepted:University of Iowa (26)University of Cincinnati (52)Case Western Reserve Univesirty (55) $10,000Louisiana State University (75)University of Buffalo-SUNY (87)Catholic University (94) $10,000Florida International University (Tier 4)Nova Southeastern University (Tier4)Florida Coastal ( Tier 4) $15,000

Waitlisted:

William and Mary (28)University of North Carolina (30)Washington and Lee (30)American University (45)Tulane University (45)University of Florida (51)Villanova Law (61)Penn State University (65)University of Miami (71)DePaul University (87)Loyola Chicago (87)

Do you maybe think the reason for so many waitlists is people applying to 50 schools like this??? You were accepted to almost the same amount I applied to.

You are correct. However, in order to give themselves a "snowball's chance in hell", people have to apply to many schools. It has continued to the point that an average applicant is applying to 20+ schools, and it's not unusual for people to do 30-40. That was unheard of just a decade ago. The irony is that the applications have "snowballed" out of control.

Maybe the ABA should consider imposing a limit of, say, 15 schools per applicant within a cycle. That's plenty. And maybe there should be a 3-strikes rule, where you can only apply to any first-year JD program twice in a lifetime. And maybe there should be a 2 in 5 rule for taking the LSAT. That is, 2 times within 5 years. That would get everything back under control by making people choose judiciously when they take the LSAT and what schools they apply to. But the LSAC would hate that b/c it makes so much money in the current system.

Last edited by PDaddy on Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I got a UCLA waitlist (which took almost half a year to send me) after being accepted to Chicago, Michigan, Duke, NW and Cornell.

I mean, if Columbia and Berkeley want to waitlist me (and believe me, they did) ok, I get it. If Harvard wants to keep me on perpetual hold until hell freezes over, that's fine too. But seriously, what did I ever do to these guys?

Now it's got me worried that the other acceptances are nothing more than an elaborate flame on the part of LSAC and that UCLA was the only one too classy to play along...

<edit for sp>

Last edited by stopscreaming on Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I got a UCLA waitlist (which took almost half a year to send me) after being accepted to Chicago, Michigan, Duke, NW and Cornell.

I mean, if Columbia and Berkeley want to waitlist me (and believe me, they did) ok, I get it. If Harvard wants to keep me on perpetual hold until hell freezes over, that's fine too. But seriously, what did I ever do to these guys?

Now it's got me worried that the other acceptances are nothing more than an elaborate flame on the part of LSAC and that UCLA was the only one too classy to play along...

<edit for sp>

I have seen this kind of thing before. Oftentimes schools that you are applying for as safeties, if they are aware of your other prospects, don't want to waste their offer on you because you are unlikely to attend, and just push some other likely attendee onto a wait list. Usually this happens when you apply later in the cycle, but for whatever its worth...

Unitas wrote:Do you maybe think the reason for so many waitlists is people applying to 50 schools like this??? You were accepted to almost the same amount I applied to.

You are correct. However, in order to give themselves a "snowball's chance in hell", people have to apply to many schools. It has continued to the point that an average applicant is applying to 20+ schools, and it's not unusual for people to do 30-40. That was unheard of just a decade ago. The irony is that the applications have "snowballed" out of control.

Maybe the ABA should consider imposing a limit of, say, 15 schools per applicant within a cycle. That's plenty. And maybe there should be a 3-strikes rule, where you can only apply to any first-year JD program twice in a lifetime. And maybe there should be a 2 in 5 rule for taking the LSAT. That is, 2 times within 5 years. That would get everything back under control by making people choose judiciously when they take the LSAT and what schools they apply to. But the LSAC would hate that b/c it makes so much money in the current system.

I got WL'd by Virginia, Texas, Georgia, and American, rejected by BU, and accepted by Emory, Illinois, and UNC. Now how the hell does that make any sense? I'm glad I applied to as many schools as I could afford; who knows what the hell adcomms must be thinking.

If you limit people to applying to only 15 schools, who's to say that there wouldn't be a glut of people applying to a narrow band of the same schools, for strategic reasons?

11 rejections2 acceptances1 waitlist. I wish I had more waitlists, that way I could at least take the LSAT again to have a chance THIS fall! ugh. Rejections = automatic wait until next year to have another shot.

ehhh, pretty close:Cornell - still waiting after EA deferralUCLA - WLVandy - WLBU - WLUIll - WLCardozo - HeldU Cincy - HeldApplied late to these last two, but still..Oh yeah, and still waiting on WUSTL after applying in Oct.Stiill waiting on GW as well

This is what I've been thinking. I don't stay around these boards too much, but I applied to 10 schools and was waitlisted by 7 of them (Columbia reserve, Duke, UVA, UPenn, Vanderbilt, Georgetown, GW). In at William and Mary thankfully, but I will do anything to go to any of the schools where I'm waitlisted. Still waiting on USC and UCLA.

With the number of applicants staying about the same and the number of applications up about 15-25% on average, do you all think these schools will be pulling from the waitlists more than usual?

Most people seem to think that with such a giant swell in applications (including an increase in the avg # of schools each applicant applies to, as well as an increase in the number of "less committed" applicants), the waitlists are going to see a lot of movement this year.

gdane5 wrote:That is one reason why. These schools are not dumb. They are well aware that students, especially the ones with good numbers, apply to many schools. When a 175/4.0 person applies to Penn State and Depaul, these schools know they are safties. Hence why schools have ED and EA programs.