Time: Thu Dec 11 06:20:39 1997
To:
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLF: IRS is an extortion racket
Cc:
Bcc: GaryArt1 <GaryArt1@aol.com>
References:
[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness,
and Vice President for Legal Affairs
c/o General Delivery at:
2509 North Campbell, #1776
Tucson, Arizona state
In Propria Persona
All Rights Reserved
without prejudice
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
In Re: ) Case No. #93-06051-PHX-GBN
)
New Life Health Center Company, ) 7th SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION
Debtor ) FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT, FOR
) RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY
) AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY
) JUDICIAL NOTICE:
________________________________)
) Rule 201(d), Federal Rules
Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) of Evidence; Rule 4001,
) Local Bankruptcy Rule;
Movant, ) Full Faith and Credit Clause
)
v. )
)
New Life Health Center Company )
et al., )
)
Respondents. )
________________________________)
COMES NOW Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Citizen of Arizona
state, expressly not a citizen of the United States ("federal
citizen"), Federal Witness, Private Attorney General, and
Candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives (hereinafter
"Movant"), to provide formal Notice to all interested party(s),
and to demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable Court,
pursuant to Rule 201(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, of
Movant's arguments, as made herein, why this Court should deny
confirmation of Debtor's First Amended Plan of Reorganization.
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 1 of 17
FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND UPON MOVANT
Fraud has been perpetrated upon this honorable Court, by
virtue of misrepresentations by Mr. Robert A. Johnson, Esquire
("Mr. Johnson"), to wit:
Mr. Johnson does not have a valid oath of office. See
attached Exhibits "A", "B", and "C", which are attached hereto
and incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.
Mr. Johnson does not enjoy any lawful power(s) of attorney
to represent the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic].
Mr. Johnson has fallen totally silent in the face of two (2)
affidavits which implicate Mr. Johnson in barratry, fraud,
extortion, and criminal conspiracy against Debtor.
Said affidavits have now become the truth of the case, for
all time. See exhibits attached.
Moreover, the "Internal Revenue Service" is not an
organization within the United States Department of the Treasury.
It has never been authorized by Act of Congress to exist as such.
The "Internal Revenue Service" is actually an extortion
racket operating as Trust #62, which is domiciled in Puerto Rico
-- a federal "State" -- under color of the Federal Alcohol
Administration ("FAA"), but the FAA was declared unconstitutional
by the Supreme Court of the United States in the year 1935.
DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS
This court has inflicted a financial hardship upon Movant by
abusing discretion and depriving Movant of Movant's fundamental
Right to due process of law, by failing timely to rule upon
Movant's APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT, RELIEF FROM THE
AUTOMATIC STAY, AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS.
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 2 of 17
Movant has thus been arbitrarily and capriciously deprived
of an opportunity to intervene in the instant case so as to
defend the Debtor against certain, specific criminal conduct
being perpetrated upon Debtor by officers, co-workers and agents
of the Debtor. Movant has gone to great lengths to document said
criminal conduct -- by means of pleadings including, but not
limited to, Movant's VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS previously
filed and properly served upon all interested party(s).
The several officers and alleged agents of this Court are
thus implicated in fraud upon Movant, and also in depriving, and
in conspiring to deprive, Movant of fundamental Rights guaranteed
to Movant by the Constitution for the United States of America,
as lawfully amended, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242.
See Exhibit "D", also incorporated herein by reference.
VERIFICATION
I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty
of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America,
without the "United States" (federal government), that the above
statement of fact is true and correct, according to the best of
My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dated: December 10, 1997
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Paul Mitchell
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)
All Rights Reserved without prejudice
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 3 of 17
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under
penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of
America, without the "United States" (federal government), that I
am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of one of the United
States of America, and that I personally served the following
document(s):
7th SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT,
FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY AND
DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE:
Rule 201(d), Federal Rules of Evidence;
Rule 4001, Local Bankruptcy Rule;
Full Faith and Credit Clause
by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first
class U.S. Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to:
Christopher H. Bayley United States Trustees
Todd V. Jones c/o P.O. Box 36170
c/o 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix 85067-6170/tdc
One Arizona Center ARIZONA STATE
Phoenix 85004-0001/tdc
ARIZONA STATE
Cathy Holt Robert A. Johnson, Esquire
Lewis and Roca "Internal Revenue Service" [sic]
c/o 40 N. Central Ave. c/o 3225 N. Central, #1500
Phoenix 85004/tdc Phoenix 85012-2469/tdc
ARIZONA STATE ARIZONA STATE
Brian Feldman, Esquire
Department of Justice
Civil Trial Section -- Western Region
c/o P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station
Washington 20044-0683/tdc
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
[See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.]
Executed on December 10, 1997:
/s/ Paul Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, Sui Juris
Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness
(expressly not a citizen of the United States)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 4 of 17
Exhibit "A":
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND
TO: Mr. Robert A. Johnson
FROM: Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell
DATE: May 27, 1996
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 5 of 17
Certified U.S. Mail c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number #P-899-777-085 Tucson, Arizona state
Return Receipt Requested zip code exempt
Restricted Delivery Requested May 27, 1996
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND
Mr. Robert A. Johnson
3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500
Phoenix, Arizona state
zip code exempt
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This is to inform you that you have been implicated in barratry
and criminal conspiracy because of verified statements of fact
which have been made in EXHIBIT "D" attached to the AFFIDAVIT OF
CAUSES AND OBJECTIONS TO O.S.C. which I executed and filed on
behalf on the Company In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New
Life Health Center Company, U.S. District Court Case No. GJ-95-1-
6, Tucson, Arizona.
You will have at most thirty (30) calendar days, as of the above
date, to file any verified affidavit(s) of rebuttal to this
EXHIBIT "D", a copy of which is attached hereto for your
convenience. Under applicable rules of the Common Law, which
have been formally invoked in this case, your failure to rebut
said EXHIBIT will render it conclusive fact and the truth of the
case for all time. Silence creates estoppel by acquiescence.
Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a
legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left
unanswered would be intentionally misleading. ... We
cannot condone this shocking conduct by the IRS. Our
revenue system is based upon the good faith of the
taxpayers and the taxpayers should be able to expect
the same from government in its enforcement and
collection activities.... This sort of deception will
not be tolerated and if this is the "routine" it should
be corrected immediately.
[U. S. vs Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977)]
[quoting U.S. vs Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 (1970)]
[emphasis added]
Silence is a species of conduct, and constitutes an
implied representation of the existence of the state of
facts in question, and the estoppel is accordingly a
species of estoppel by misrepresentation. [cite
omitted] When silence is of such a character and under
such circumstances that it would become a fraud upon
the other party to permit the party who has kept silent
to deny what his silence has induced the other to
believe and act upon, it will operate as an estoppel.
[Carmine vs Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906), emphasis added]
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 6 of 17
Please be advised that the Company and its officers and co-
workers have explicitly reserved their right to have a jury of
peers resolve controversies of fact and law in this case.
Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation. The clock
is now running.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state
(520) 323-3921 phone/VM
(520) 323-3922 fax/24-hour
email: pmitch@primenet.com
copies: Judge John M. Roll, U.S. District Court, Tucson
Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit, Pasadena
Judge George Nielsen, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix
Albert M. Rau, Chapter 13 Trustee, Phoenix
James J. Everett, Counsel for Debtors, Phoenix
# # #
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 7 of 17
Exhibit "B":
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND
TO: Mr. Robert A. Johnson
FROM: Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell
DATE: June 15, 1996
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 8 of 17
Certified U.S. Mail c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number #P-476-653-250 Tucson, Arizona state
Return Receipt Requested zip code exempt
Restricted Delivery Requested June 15, 1996
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND
Mr. Robert A. Johnson
3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500
Phoenix, Arizona state
zip code exempt
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This is to inform you that you have been implicated in barratry,
fraud, extortion, and criminal conspiracy because of verified
statements of fact which have been made in the JOINT AFFIDAVIT OF
DR. AND MRS. EUGENE BURNS AND DR. AND MRS. SHELDON DEAL, which
was executed and filed on behalf on the Company In re: Grand Jury
Subpoena Served on New Life Health Center Company, U.S. District
Court Case No. GJ-95-1-6, Tucson, Arizona.
You will have at most thirty (30) calendar days, as of the above
date, to file any verified affidavit(s) of rebuttal to this
AFFIDAVIT, a copy of which is attached hereto for your
convenience. Under applicable rules of the Common Law, which
have been formally invoked in this case, your failure to rebut
said AFFIDAVIT will render it conclusive fact and the truth of
the case for all time. Silence creates estoppel by acquiescence.
Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a
legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left
unanswered would be intentionally misleading. ... We
cannot condone this shocking conduct by the IRS. Our
revenue system is based upon the good faith of the
taxpayers and the taxpayers should be able to expect
the same from government in its enforcement and
collection activities.... This sort of deception will
not be tolerated and if this is the "routine" it should
be corrected immediately.
[U. S. vs Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977)]
[quoting U.S. vs Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 (1970)]
[emphasis added]
Silence is a species of conduct, and constitutes an
implied representation of the existence of the state of
facts in question, and the estoppel is accordingly a
species of estoppel by misrepresentation. [cite
omitted] When silence is of such a character and under
such circumstances that it would become a fraud upon
the other party to permit the party who has kept silent
to deny what his silence has induced the other to
believe and act upon, it will operate as an estoppel.
[Carmine vs Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906), emphasis added]
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 9 of 17
Please be advised that the Company and its officers and co-
workers have explicitly reserved their right to have a jury of
peers resolve controversies of fact and law in this case.
Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation. The clock
is now running.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state
(520) 323-3921 phone/VM
(520) 323-3922 fax/24-hour
email: pmitch@primenet.com
copies: Judge John M. Roll, U.S. District Court, Tucson
Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit, Pasadena
Judge George Nielsen, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix
Albert M. Rau, Chapter 13 Trustee, Phoenix
James J. Everett, former Counsel for Debtors, Phoenix
# # #
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 10 of 17
Exhibit "C":
AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT
TO: Mr. Robert A. Johnson
FROM: Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell
DATE: August 5, 1996
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 11 of 17
Certified U.S. Mail c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776
Serial Number #P-332-390-902 Tucson, Arizona state
Return Receipt Requested zip code exempt
Restricted Delivery Requested August 5, 1996
AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT
Mr. Robert A. Johnson
3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500
Phoenix, Arizona state
zip code exempt
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This is my AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT affirming, under penalty of
perjury, that by your total silence you have defaulted in the
face of my two (2) CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICES AND DEMANDS dated May 27,
1996, and June 15, 1996, respectively, copies of which are
attached for your information and recollection.
In said NOTICES AND DEMANDS, you were advised that your
silence in the face of the attached AFFIDAVITS would render them
conclusive fact and the truth of the case for all time, and that
your silence would invoke estoppel by acquiescence.
To repeat, you have completely failed to answer or otherwise
rebut, either verbally or in writing, any of the statements which
have been made in the above mentioned AFFIDAVITS.
VERIFICATION
I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws
of the United States of America, without the "United States,"
that the above statement of fact is true and correct, to the best
of my current knowledge, information, and belief, that it is
materially complete and not misleading, so help Me God, pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Executed on August 5, 1996.
/s/ Paul Mitchell
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness
attachments
copy: Federal Bureau of Investigation
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 12 of 17
Exhibit "D":
PRESS RELEASE:
"Paul Mitchell Wins Civil Verdict
against Accountant for Embezzling $3,000"
November 12, 1997
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 13 of 17
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 12, 1997
Paul Mitchell Wins Civil Verdict
against Accountant for Embezzling $3,000
Tucson, Arizona. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Counselor at Law, federal
witness, and founder of the Supreme Law Firm and Supreme Law
School, was awarded more than $3,000 in actual damages today from
a jury of 8 who agreed that Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock had
embezzled funds entrusted to their care and management.
Mitchell was invited by the Nordbrocks to change plans and
move to Tucson in late February of 1996, when they met at a
conference on common law in Albuquerque, New Mexico. A scheduled
speaker failed to show, and Mitchell was asked to address a full
audience instead. The Nordbrocks were so moved by Mitchell's
lecture, they offered him an office in Tucson, Arizona, to
continue his research there. That office was a single room,
without windows, in the administrative headquarters of the New
Life Health Center.
Soon after arriving in Tucson, Mitchell was invited to
lecture at the Elizabeth Broderick Seminars in Palmdale,
California, where Broderick claimed to have perfected huge
commercial liens against government agencies like the County of
Orange, California. Broderick even took credit for precipitating
the largest municipal bankruptcy in the history of America, when
the County of Orange floundered under Treasurer Robert Citron's
failed financial management of overly leveraged derivatives.
Broderick then issued phony bank checks against these bogus liens
to all attendees of her biweekly seminars. An estimated 5,000
people received her warrants at these seminars.
Broderick's checks were collected at FBI headquarters in Los
Angeles, California. From there, the checks were handed to a
property forfeiture team, with headquarters in the Department of
Justice. Mitchell has recently filed a formal OFFER TO PROVE
RACKETEERING in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona,
alleging that DOJ aided and abetted Broderick's racket, by using
the phony checks to entrap Broderick's naive seminar attendees.
Broderick has since been convicted of 26 counts of bank fraud and
mail fraud. All her co-defendants were likewise convicted.
While Mitchell was beginning to build an early foundation
for Broderick's defense, his efforts were quickly scuttled when
the Colton office rented by Adolf Hoch, a Broderick associate,
was gutted of all computer and related equipment, leaving only
the carpets and empty desks. At the same time, Mitchell was
loaned a car with tampered front brakes. A Colton auto mechanic
invited him to inspect the car, while it was on the rack and the
brake assembly was at eye level. Adolf Hoch was asked to pay for
the repairs, but he complained that the mechanic was gouging him.
At that time, Hoch was driving a new Buick Riviera worth $35,000,
and the estimated brake repairs cost less than $500.
A related case was also heating up while Mitchell was in
Colton, attempting to assemble a major defense strategy for
Broderick and her co-defendants. The New Life Health Center in
Tucson, Arizona, was served with a grand jury subpoena for all
business records. The general manager of New Life, Eugene A.
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 14 of 17
Burns, had used several Broderick warrants, "flushing New Life
with much needed cash," as Adolf Hoch had confided to Mitchell,
on one of several trips from Broderick's San Bernardino office to
the Essex Hotel in Palmdale, California. En route to Palmdale,
Hoch was speeding at 90 mph, and nearly missed a small car as it
crossed the highway, failing to anticipate the high speed of
Hoch's new Buick in the dark desert. Hoch made a habit of
holding the wheel with one hand and a cell phone in the other,
while weaving recklessly through rush hour traffic.
Mitchell returned to Tucson and turned his attention to an
aggressive attack on the grand jury subpoena, and on the Internal
Revenue Service which had initiated DOJ's attempt to obtain New
Life's records. With strong encouragement from Neil Nordbrock,
Mitchell conceived a powerful defense which was recently
published in the Supreme Law Library, an Internet-based archive
of all key cases Mitchell has litigated as a Counselor at Law.
That library is available at Internet URL http://supremelaw.com.
To facilitate court appearances, Mitchell was appointed to
the office of New Life's Vice President for Legal Affairs, at the
recommendation of New Life's accountant, Neil Nordbrock, and that
appointment was recognized, and placed into evidence, by United
States District Judge John M. Roll in Tucson. With this
authority, Mitchell wrote a flurry of 25 pleadings which
overwhelmed the federal judge and sent the IRS and DOJ running
for cover.
One of those pleadings exposed, for the first time, what
Mitchell now calls "The Kick-Back Racket," a defunct federal
program called Performance Management and Recognition System,
which awards illegal cash payments to prosecutors and judges, for
getting indictments from grand juries against tax protestors.
Mitchell all but proved that a perjury racket was, and still is,
rampant within the DOJ. On a motion by the corrupt prosecutor,
Robert L. Miskell, the federal judge then struck all of
Mitchell's 25 pleadings, after obstructing their delivery by the
U.S. Postal Service to the federal grand jury convened in that
case. Mitchell even used Registered U.S. Mail, but the return
receipts were signed by Judge Roll's secretary, instead of the
grand jury foreperson.
During the course of studying New Life's records, Mitchell
also discovered that his appointment to the office of Vice
President had been faked by a rubber stamp trustee. In a very
confidential memo to Neil Nordbrock, long-time accountant for New
Life, Mitchell predicted that a fictitious trustee would cause
enormous legal problems for New Life, if it was not corrected
immediately. Nordbrock never answered Mitchell's memo on this
subject, and observed passively as Eugene A. Burns, a former
racketball champion, fell into a full blown panic when the FBI
put pressure on Burns to jettison Mitchell from the case.
Mitchell was abruptly terminated from New Life one month after
Nordbrock received this confidential memo. Mitchell concluded
from this that Nordbrock had conceived and/or maintained the
fictitious trustee, from the beginning.
The Pima County Justice Court, in which Mitchell sued
Nordbrock, refused to allow this confidential memorandum into
evidence, in addition to four full boxes of other documents. The
judge in that case, Walter U. Weber, also decided to disallow
Mitchell's claim that the Nordbrocks had breached a contract for
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 15 of 17
legal services Mitchell performed for them after his wrongful
termination from New Life. Weber ruled that Mitchell had
practiced law by providing legal services to the Nordbrocks.
Mitchell plans to appeal that portion of the case, to make
precedent based in part on the original 13th Amendment, and the
Contract Clause in the U.S. Constitution. Mitchell also
maneuvered Weber into a bona fide controversy over the provisions
invoked by Weber's oath of office to support that Constitution.
Neil Nordbrock had retained Mitchell to commence a quiet
title action against the IRS, but Mitchell referred that case to
Vern Holland in Tulsa, Oklahoma, a recognized quiet title expert,
after Mitchell was invited to defend the Montana Freeman on
location in Billings, Montana. Mitchell highly recommended
Holland to the Nordbrocks, who did retain Holland to prepare the
initial complaint to quiet title to a business office once owned
by the Nordbrocks, but now forfeited to the IRS for unpaid
federal income taxes. Neil Nordbrock had tendered a bogus
Montana Freeman warrant to the IRS for the sum of $398,000,
during the month before the Albuquerque conference.
Upon returning from Montana, Mitchell learned that the
Nordbrocks were about to switch attorneys once again, and retain
a local Tucson bar member, after complaining bitterly and often
to Mitchell about the bar monopoly practices. The Nordbrocks
then paid the new attorney's retainer with money they embezzled
from Mitchell. That $3,000 was all the money which Mitchell had
in the world, at that point in time, and the embezzlement put
enormous pressure on Mitchell just to survive. A private
mediator even had to loan Mitchell money, just to buy food.
Other generous Americans have quietly helped Mitchell climb out
of the deep hole caused by DOJ's outright economic retaliation.
Neil Nordbrock has already been convicted on two felony
counts of falsifying federal income tax returns, and a lifetime
injunction prevents him from preparing tax returns. Evelyn
Nordbrock, his wife, makes a living doing tax returns for Neil's
former clients, despite their low opinion of the IRS. Clearly,
they have mixed feelings about Mitchell's admitted plans, and
highly successful efforts thus far, to dismantle the IRS. Evelyn
Nordbrock will need to find other work, if Mitchell succeeds.
Mitchell also plans to sue Eugene A. Burns for wrongful
termination, and a host of other claims arising from his practice
of refusing Mitchell's frequent legal mail, and defaming Mitchell
with obnoxious insults on the outside of refused envelopes.
Under pressure from Mitchell to subpoena Eugene A. Burns for
additional testimony, however, Walter U. Weber explained that
Burns was no longer available. Why, he did not say.
Weber had also threatened Mitchell with prison and hard
labor, during the first day of trial, because of all the
sensitive issues raised by Mitchell's voluminous pleadings.
Mitchell types 140 words per minute, and shares huge quantities
of email on the Internet. A motion to change judge was denied.
Mitchell has filed a criminal complaint against Weber anyway,
because Mitchell is a recognized federal witness under 18 U.S.C.
1513, the federal law which prohibits retaliating against any
federal witness. The penalties for violating this criminal
statute are quite severe.
Mitchell is now awaiting a ruling from a federal bankruptcy
court in Phoenix, Arizona, to lift the automatic stay on
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 16 of 17
litigation against Burns and his company, and to issue a
declaratory judgment on the validity of Mitchell's appointment to
the office of Vice President for Legal Affairs. Mitchell's
research has already uncovered numerous irregularities in the
original bankruptcy petitions by Burns and New Life, including
false appraisals of 4 rare South American macaw birds which Burns
regards as his special pets. Magoo and the other macaws
accompany Burns to and from work every day, and daily screech at
high decibels, while people are trying to work, and talk on the
telephone, in the same office space.
Burns paid Mitchell $100 per week initially, upping that to
$500 per week during the height of the grand jury litigation, but
stiffed Mitchell for over $2,000 in back pay, when Mitchell
discovered that "Sheryl Smith" is a fictitious trustee. Burns
routinely paid New Life's former attorney, James J. Everett, at a
rate of $175 per hour, before Everett upped that rate to $200 per
hour. Burns is now reported to have sued Everett for fraudulent
invoices; this report remains unconfirmed.
Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay:
Page 17 of 17
# # #
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13