Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing
fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Fate Therapeutics, Inc. will be held on Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. local time,
at the offices of Fate Therapeutics, Inc., 3535 General Atomics Court, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121, for the following purposes:

1.

To elect two Class III directors, as nominated by the Board of Directors, to hold office until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

2.

To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and

3.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.

Proposal 1 relates solely to the election of two Class III directors nominated by the Board of Directors and does not include any other
matters relating to the election of directors, including without limitation, the election of directors nominated by any stockholder of the Company.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on Monday, March 21, 2016 as the record date for the determination of stockholders
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or at any adjournments of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

In order to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, you are requested to submit your proxy as instructed in the
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials that you received in the mail. You may also request a paper proxy card at any time on or before April 29, 2016 to submit your vote by mail. If you attend the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and file with the Secretary of the Company an instrument revoking your proxy or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, your proxy will not be used.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

/s/ J. Scott Wolchko

J. Scott Wolchko

President and Chief Executive Officer

San Diego, California

March 30, 2016

Your vote is important, whether or not
you expect to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. You are urged to vote either via the Internet or telephone, as instructed in the Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials that you received in the mail. Voting promptly
will help avoid the additional expense of further solicitation to assure a quorum at the meeting.

This proxy statement (Proxy Statement) is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use prior to or at the 2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) of Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), a Delaware corporation, to be held at 8:00 a.m. local time on Wednesday, May 11, 2016 and at any adjournments or
postponements thereof for the following purposes:



To elect two Class III directors, as nominated by the Companys Board of Directors (Board of Directors), to hold office until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are
duly elected and qualified;



To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and



To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The Annual Meeting will be held at the offices of the Company, 3535 General Atomics Court, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121. On or about
March 30, 2016, we mailed to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice) containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our 2015 Annual
Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report).

Solicitation

This solicitation is made on behalf of the Board of Directors. We will bear the costs of preparing, mailing, online processing and other costs
of the proxy solicitation made by our Board of Directors. Certain of our officers and employees may solicit the submission of proxies authorizing the voting of shares in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendations. Such
solicitations may be made by telephone, facsimile transmission or personal solicitation. No additional compensation will be paid to such officers, directors or regular employees for such services. We will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in sending proxy materials to stockholders.

Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

In accordance with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC), instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each stockholder of record, the Company may furnish proxy materials via the internet. Accordingly, all of the Companys stockholders will receive a
Notice, to be mailed on or about March 30, 2016.

On the date of mailing the Notice, stockholders will be able to access all of the
proxy materials on the website at www.astproxyportal.com/ast/18615. The proxy materials will be available free of charge. The Notice will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy
materials (including the Annual Report) over the internet or through other methods specified on the website. The website contains instructions as to how to vote by internet or over the telephone. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may
request a paper or email copy of the proxy card. If you received a Notice and would like to receive printed copies of the proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice.

Only holders of record of our common stock as of the close of business on March 21, 2016 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote
at, the Annual Meeting. Each holder of common stock will be entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on March 21, 2016, there were 28,861,711 shares of common stock
issued and outstanding.

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to take action at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders representing a majority
of the outstanding shares of our common stock (present in person or represented by proxy) will constitute a quorum. We will appoint an inspector of elections for the meeting to determine whether or not a quorum is present and to tabulate votes cast
by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions, withheld votes and broker non-votes (which occur when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular matter because such broker, bank or
other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote on that matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner) are counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of
business at the Annual Meeting.

Votes Required for Each Proposal

To elect our directors and approve the other proposals being considered at the Annual Meeting, the voting requirements are as follows:

Proposal

Vote Required

Discretionary Voting Permitted?

Election of Directors

Plurality

No

Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP

Majority

Yes

Discretionary Voting Permitted means that brokers will have discretionary voting authority
with respect to shares held in street name for their clients, even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from their client.

Majority means a majority of the votes properly cast for and against such matter.

Plurality means a plurality of the votes properly cast on such matter. For the election of directors, the two nominees
receiving the plurality of votes entitled to vote and cast will be elected as directors.

The vote required and method of calculation for
the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting are as follows:

Proposal OneElection of Directors. If a quorum is
present, the director nominees receiving the highest number of votes, in person or by proxy, will be elected as directors. You may vote FOR all nominees, WITHHOLD for all nominees, or WITHHOLD for any nominee by
specifying the name of the nominee on your proxy card. Withheld votes and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election of the directors.

Proposal TwoApproval of the Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast for and against such matter. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN from voting on this proposal. If
you abstain from voting on this matter, your shares will not be counted as votes cast with respect to such matter, and the abstention will have no effect on the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and
will therefore have no effect on the proposal.

We request that you vote your shares by proxy following the methods as instructed by the
Notice: over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. If you choose to vote by mail, your shares will be voted in accordance with your voting instructions if the proxy card is received prior to or at the Annual Meeting. If you sign and return your
proxy card but do not give voting instructions, your shares will be voted FOR (i) the election of each of the

Companys two (2) nominees as Class III directors; (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm
for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and (iii) as the proxy holder deems advisable, in her discretion, on other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

Voting by Proxy Over the Internet or by Telephone

Stockholders whose shares are registered in their own names may vote by proxy by mail, over the Internet or by telephone. Instructions for
voting by proxy over the Internet or by telephone are set forth on the Notice. The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 10, 2016. The Notice will also provide instructions on how
you can elect to receive future proxy materials electronically or in printed form by mail. If you choose to receive future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to the proxy materials
and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials electronically or in printed form by mail will remain in effect until you terminate such election.

If your shares are held in street name, the voting instruction form sent to you by your broker, bank or other nominee should indicate whether
the institution has a process for beneficial holders to provide voting instructions over the Internet or by telephone. A number of banks and brokerage firms participate in a program that also permits stockholders whose shares are held in street name
to direct their vote over the Internet or by telephone. If your bank or brokerage firm gives you this opportunity, the voting instructions from the bank or brokerage firm that accompany this Proxy Statement will tell you how to use the Internet or
telephone to direct the vote of shares held in your account. If your voting instruction form does not include Internet or telephone information, please complete and return the voting instruction form in the self-addressed, postage-paid envelope
provided by your broker. Stockholders who vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone need not return a proxy card or voting instruction form by mail, but may incur costs, such as usage charges, from telephone companies or Internet service
providers.

Revocability of Proxies

Any proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised by filing an instrument revoking it with the Companys Secretary or by
submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date prior to the time of the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who have voted by proxy over the Internet or by telephone or have executed and returned a proxy and who then attend the Annual Meeting and
desire to vote in person are requested to notify the Secretary in writing prior to the time of the Annual Meeting. We request that all such written notices of revocation to the Company be addressed to Cindy R. Tahl, Secretary, c/o Fate
Therapeutics, Inc., at the address of our principal executive offices at 3535 General Atomics Court, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121. Our telephone number is (858) 875-1800. Stockholders may also revoke their proxy by entering a new
vote over the Internet or by telephone.

Stockholder Proposals to be Presented at the Next Annual Meeting

Any stockholder who meets the requirements of the proxy rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), may submit proposals to the Board of Directors to be presented at the 2017 annual meeting. Such proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and be submitted in writing by notice delivered or
mailed by first-class United States mail, postage prepaid, to our Secretary at our principal executive offices at the address set forth above no later than November 30, 2016 in order to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials to be
disseminated by the Board of Directors for such annual meeting. If the date of the 2017 annual meeting is moved by more than 30 days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous years proxy statement, then notice must be
received within a reasonable time before we begin to print and send proxy materials. If that happens, we will publicly announce the deadline

for submitting a proposal in a press release or in a document filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). A proposal submitted outside the requirements of
Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act will be considered untimely if received after February 13, 2017.

Our Amended and Restated
Bylaws (Bylaws) also provide for separate notice procedures to recommend a person for nomination as a director or to propose business to be considered by stockholders at a meeting. To be considered timely under these provisions, the
stockholders notice must be received by our Secretary at our principal executive offices at the address set forth above no earlier than January 11, 2017 and no later than February 10, 2017. Our Bylaws also specify requirements as to
the form and content of a stockholders notice.

The Board of Directors, a designated committee thereof or the chairman of the
meeting may refuse to acknowledge the introduction of any stockholder proposal if it is not made in compliance with the applicable notice provisions.

Our certificate of incorporation provides for a Board of Directors that is divided into three classes. The term for each class is
three years, staggered over time. This year, the term of the directors in Class III expires. Our two Class III directors will both stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Our Board of Directors is currently comprised of seven members.
If both of the Class III director nominees are elected at the Annual Meeting, the composition of our Board of Directors will be as follows: Class IDrs. Robert S. Epstein and John D. Mendlein; Class IIMr. Mark J.
Enyedy, and Drs. Amir Nashat and William H. Rastetter; and Class IIIMessrs. J. Scott Wolchko and Timothy P. Coughlin.

In
the absence of instructions to the contrary, the person named as proxy holder in the accompanying proxy intends to vote in favor of the election of the nominees designated below to serve until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their
successors shall have been duly elected and qualified. Each nominee is currently a director. The Board of Directors expects that each nominee will be available to serve as a director, but if any such nominee should become unavailable or unwilling to
stand for election, it is intended that the shares represented by the proxy will be voted for such substitute nominee as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The biographies of our directors and their ages as of March 1, 2016 are set
forth below.

Name

Age

Position

J. Scott Wolchko

46

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

William H. Rastetter, Ph.D.(1)(2)(3)

67

Chairman of the Board

John D. Mendlein, Ph.D., J.D.(3)

56

Vice Chairman of the Board

Timothy P. Coughlin(1)(2)

49

Director

Mark J. Enyedy(1)(2)

52

Director

Robert S. Epstein, M.D., M.S.(2)

60

Director

Amir Nashat, Sc.D.(3)

43

Director

(1)

Member of the Audit Committee.

(2)

Member of the Compensation Committee.

(3)

Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Nominees for Director

Class III:

The persons listed
below are nominated for election to Class III of the Board of Directors to serve a three-year term ending at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the following nominees.

Timothy P. Coughlin has been a director since August 2013. He has served as Chief Financial Officer of Neurocrine
Biosciences, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, since September 2006, where he previously served as Vice President, Controller. Since 2015, Mr. Coughlin has also served on the board of directors of Retrophin, Inc., a biotechnology company.
Prior to joining Neurocrine in 2002, he was with Catholic Health Initiatives, a nationwide integrated healthcare delivery system, where he served as Vice President, Financial Services. Mr. Coughlin also served as a Senior Manager in the Health
Sciences practice of Ernst & Young LLP and its predecessors from 1989 to 1999. Mr. Coughlin holds a masters degree in international business from San Diego State University and a bachelors degree in accounting from
Temple University. Mr. Coughlin is a certified public accountant in both California and Pennsylvania.

The Board of Directors believes Mr. Coughlin is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors
due to his extensive background in financial and accounting matters for public companies and his leadership experience in the biotechnology industry, including his position at Neurocrine.

J. Scott Wolchko has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2015, and as a director since October
2015. Mr. Wolchko has also served as our Chief Operating Officer since February 2013 and as our Chief Financial Officer since the commencement of our operations in September 2007. Mr. Wolchko began his career in 1994 as an investment
banker with Morgan Stanley & Co., serving in the firms New York City and Menlo Park, California offices. As a member of the firms Investment Banking Health Care Group, he assisted emerging growth companies in the life sciences
sector complete capital-raising and M&A transactions. Prior to joining us, from July 2001 to September 2007, Mr. Wolchko served as the Chief Financial Officer of Bocada, Inc., an enterprise software company that specializes in data
protection management. Mr. Wolchko holds an M.S. in biochemical engineering from the University of Virginia, and a B.S. in biomedical engineering from the University of Vermont.

The Board of Directors believes Mr. Wolchkos extensive leadership, executive, managerial, business and healthcare industry
experience qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Wolchkos day-to-day management and intimate knowledge of our business and operations provide our Board with an in-depth understanding of the
Company.

Class I: Currently Serving Until the 2017 Annual Meeting

Robert S. Epstein, M.D., M.S. has served as a member of our Board of Directors since March 2014. Dr. Epstein is an
epidemiologist and strategic consultant to life sciences companies and serves as a director on the boards of Veracyte, Inc., a molecular diagnostic company, Illumina, Inc., a life sciences company, and Proteus Digital Health, Inc., a
healthcare technology company. From August 2010 to April 2012, Dr. Epstein served as president of the Medco-UBC Division and Chief Research and Development officer of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. (Medco), a managed healthcare
company. In this role, Dr. Epstein was responsible for all of Medcos clinical research initiatives, including the Medco Research Consortium and United BioSource Corporation. Dr. Epstein served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Medical Officer from 1997 to August 2010 at Medco and was appointed President of the Medco Research Institute in 2009. Before joining the private sector, Dr. Epstein was trained as an epidemiologist and held various positions in public health
and academia. He is a past elected President of the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research and has served on the Board of Directors for the Drug Information Association. In 2008, Dr. Epstein was nominated and elected
to the Federal CDC EGAPP (Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice & Prevention) Stakeholder Committee, and the AHRQ CERT (Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics) Committee. Dr. Epstein holds a B.S. and an M.D. from
the University of Michigan and an M.S. from the University of Maryland.

The Board of Directors has determined that
Dr. Epsteins extensive operating, commercial, and senior management experience in the biotechnology industry, as well as his expertise in health economics, qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.

John D. Mendlein, Ph.D., J.D. has served as our Vice Chairman of the Board since November 2011 and a director since April 2008.
He also previously served as our Chief Executive Officer, as well as the founding Chairman of the Board and Chief Science Officer. Dr. Mendlein also serves as a member of the board and as Chief Executive Officer of aTyr Pharma, Inc., a
biopharmaceutical company, positions he has held since July 2010 and September 2011, respectively. From July 2010 to December 2015, Dr. Mendlein also served as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors for aTyr Pharma, Inc. He also holds
board positions with Pronutria Biosciences, Inc., an amino acid biologics company, The BIO (Biotechnology Industry Organization) emerging companies board, Editas Medicine, Inc., a genome editing company, and Moderna Therapeutics, Inc, an mRNA
therapeutics company. Dr. Mendlein previously served from 2005 to 2008 as the Chief Executive Officer of Adnexus Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, which was purchased by Bristol-Myers Squibb

(BMY) in 2008. Dr. Mendlein also served on the board of directors of Monogram Biosciences, Inc., an HIV and oncology diagnostic company that was acquired by Laboratory Corporation of
America Holdings in 2009. Before that, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Affinium Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (acquired by Debiopharm Group) from 2000 to 2005, and board member, General Counsel and Chief Knowledge Officer at Aurora
Bioscience Corporation (acquired by Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) from August 1996 to September 2001. Dr. Mendlein holds a Ph.D. in physiology and biophysics from the University of California, Los Angeles, a J.D. from the University of
California, Hastings College of the Law, and a B.S. in biology from the University of Miami.

The Board of Directors has determined that
Dr. Mendleins extensive business and leadership experience in the biotechnology industry qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.

Class II: Currently Serving Until the 2018 Annual Meeting

Mark J. Enyedy has served as a director since July 2012. Mr. Enyedy is Executive Vice President and Head of Corporate
Development for Shire plc, a biopharmaceutical company, a position he has held since May 2014. He joined Shire in August 2013 as Senior Vice President and Head of the Internal Medicine business unit. Prior to Shire, from September 2011 to July
2013, Mr. Enyedy served as Chief Executive Officer and director of Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Prior to Proteostasis, he served 15 years with Genzyme Corporation, a biotechnology company, most
recently as President of the Transplant, Oncology and Multiple Sclerosis divisions. Before joining Genzyme, Mr. Enyedy was an associate in the business law department at Palmer & Dodge. Mr. Enyedy holds a J.D. from Harvard Law
School and a B.S. in criminal justice from Northeastern University.

The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Enyedys extensive
strategic, operational and business experience with life sciences companies qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.

Amir Nashat, Sc.D. has served as a director since September 2007. He is also a Managing General Partner at Polaris Venture
Partners, a venture capital firm. He joined Polaris in April 2002 and focuses on investments in healthcare, consumer products and energy. Dr. Nashat currently represents Polaris as a director of BIND Therapeutics, Inc. and as a director of aTyr
Pharma, Inc., both biopharmaceutical companies, as well as a director of several private companies. Additionally, Dr. Nashat has served as a director of Adnexus Therapeutics (acquired by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) and other private
companies. Dr. Nashat holds a Sc.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with a minor in biology, and an M.S. and B.S. in materials science and mechanical engineering from the University of California,
Berkeley.

The Board of Directors believes that Dr. Nashat is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors due to his extensive
experience within the field of drug discovery and development, his broad leadership experience on various boards, and his financial expertise with life sciences companies.

William H. Rastetter, Ph.D. has served as Chairman of the Board and a director since November 2011. From February 2012 to
October 2012, he also served as our interim Chief Executive Officer. He is a Co-Founder of Receptos, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Celgene Corporation, where he served as a director and Chairman of the
Board from 2009 to 2015, and was Acting Chief Executive Officer from May 2009 to November 2010. Dr. Rastetter also served as the Chairman of Illumina, Inc. from 2005 to 2016, and as a director of Illumina, Inc. from 1998 to 2016.
Dr. Rastetter currently serves as the Chairman of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., as the lead outside director of Cerulean Pharma Inc., and as a director of Regulus Therapeutics, Inc. and Grail, Inc., a majority owned subsidiary of
Illumina. He also serves as a strategic advisor to Leerink Partners, a healthcare focused investment bank, and as an advisor to Illumina Ventures, a genomics focused venture firm. Dr. Rastetter served as a Partner at the venture capital firm of
Venrock from 2006 to February 2013. Prior to that, Dr. Rastetter was Executive Chairman of Biogen Idec, from the merger of the two companies (Biogen and Idec Pharmaceuticals) in 2003 through the end of 2005. He joined Idec Pharmaceuticals

at its founding in 1986 and served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to Idec, he was Director of Corporate Ventures at Genentech, Inc. and also served in a scientific capacity
at Genentech. Dr. Rastetter held various faculty positions at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University and was an Alfred P. Sloan Fellow. Dr. Rastetter holds a Ph.D. and M.A. in chemistry from Harvard University and
an S.B. in chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The Board of Directors believes Dr. Rastetter is qualified to
serve on our Board of Directors due to his extensive experience in the biotechnology industry, his broad leadership experience with Idec Pharmaceuticals and on several boards of pharmaceutical companies, and his experience with financial matters.

Board of Directors Role in Risk Management

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks,
including risks relating to our financial condition, development and commercialization activities, operations and intellectual property. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks we face, while our Board of Directors, as a
whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, our Board of Directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by
management are adequate and functioning as designed.

The role of our Board of Directors in overseeing the management of our risks is
conducted primarily through committees of the Board of Directors, as disclosed in the descriptions of each of the committees below and in the charters of each of the committees. The full Board of Directors (or the appropriate board committee in the
case of risks that are under the purview of a particular committee) discusses with management our major risk exposures, their potential impact on our company, and the steps we take to manage them. When a board committee is responsible for evaluating
and overseeing the management of a particular risk or risks, the chairman of the relevant committee reports on the discussion to the full Board of Directors during the committee reports portion of the next board meeting. This enables our Board of
Directors and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships.

Compensation Risk Assessment

We believe that although a portion of the compensation provided to our executive officers and other employees is performance-based,
our executive compensation program does not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking. This is primarily due to the fact that our compensation programs are designed to encourage our executive officers and other employees to remain focused on
both short-term and long-term strategic goals, in particular in connection with our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. As a result, we do not believe that our compensation programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on
the Company.

Board of Directors and Committees of the Board

During 2015, the Board of Directors held a total of eight meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of the total number of Board meetings
and all directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of Board committees on which the director served during the time he served on the Board or such committees.

Our Board of Directors has determined that all of our directors, except for Mr. Wolchko, are independent, as determined in accordance
with the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ) and the SEC. In making such independence determination, the Board of Directors considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with us and all other facts and
circumstances that the Board of Directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director. In considering the independence of the directors listed above, our
Board of Directors considered the association of our directors with the holders of more than 5% of our common stock. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee. Each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed entirely of independent directors in accordance with current NASDAQ listing standards. Furthermore, our
Audit Committee meets the enhanced independence standards established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rulemaking of the SEC. Copies of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
charters and our corporate governance guidelines are available, free of charge, on our website at http://ir.fatetherapeutics.com/governance.cfm.

Audit Committee

Mr. Coughlin, Mr. Enyedy and Dr. Rastetter currently serve on the Audit Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Coughlin. Our
Board of Directors has designated Mr. Coughlin as an Audit Committee financial expert, as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC. The Audit Committees responsibilities include:



appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm;



approving auditing and permissible non-audit services, and the terms of such services, to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm;



reviewing the internal audit plan with the independent registered public accounting firm and members of management responsible for preparing our financial statements;



reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures as well as critical accounting policies and practices
used by us;



reviewing the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting;



establishing policies and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting-related complaints and concerns;



recommending, based upon the Audit Committees review and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, whether our audited financial statements shall be included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K;



monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to our financial statements and accounting matters;



preparing or overseeing the Audit Committee report required by SEC rules to be included in our annual proxy statement;



reviewing all related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations and approving all such transactions; and



reviewing quarterly earnings releases.

During 2015, the Audit Committee held four meetings.

Compensation Committee

Mr. Coughlin, Mr. Enyedy, Dr. Epstein and Dr. Rastetter currently serve on the Compensation Committee, which is chaired by
Mr. Enyedy. The Compensation Committees responsibilities include:



reviewing and approving, or upon the request of the Board of Directors, reviewing and recommending for approval by the Board of Directors, the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer and our other executive officers;



evaluating the performance of our Chief Executive Officer in light of such corporate goals and objectives and recommending the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the Board of Directors for approval;

reviewing and approving the compensation, including with respect to any cash compensation (including severance), incentive compensation plans, equity-based plans, perquisites and other benefits, of our other executive
officers;

evaluating and assessing potential and current compensation advisers in accordance with the independence standards identified in the applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules;



retaining and approving the compensation of any compensation advisers;



reviewing and approving our policies and procedures for the grant of equity-based awards; and



reviewing and making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to director compensation.

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of
executive and director compensation. The Compensation Committee engaged Radford as a compensation consultant to perform compensation advisory services during 2015. The Compensation Committee instructed the consultant to conduct an independent
evaluation of the Companys existing peer group of companies and provide recommended changes to the peer group to assess the competitiveness of the Companys executive, equity and Board of Directors compensation programs and to review the
Companys equity program and broader equity practices. Our Compensation Committee plans to retain a consultant to provide similar information and advice in future years for consideration in determining annual cash, equity and other compensation
for our employees, executive officers and directors. We do not believe the retention of, and the work performed by, Radford creates any conflict of interest.

Pursuant to our 2013 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has delegated to our Chief Executive Officer the authority to
approve grants of stock options or restricted stock units to new hires, subject to certain limitations for each level of employment and an annual aggregate maximum amount of awards that can be granted pursuant to such delegated authority.

During 2015, the Compensation Committee held five meetings.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Drs. Nashat, Rastetter and Mendlein currently serve on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is chaired by
Dr. Rastetter. Dr. Mendlein joined the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in March 2016. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees responsibilities include:



developing and recommending to the Board of Directors criteria for board and committee membership;



establishing procedures for identifying and evaluating Board of Director candidates, including nominees recommended by stockholders;



identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors;



recommending to the Board of Directors the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to each of the boards committees;



developing and recommending to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance guidelines; and



overseeing the evaluation of the Board of Directors.

During 2015, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting.

The positions of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are presently separated at Fate. Separating these positions allows our
Chief Executive Officer to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead our Board of Directors in its fundamental role of providing advice to and independent oversight of management. Our Board of Directors
recognizes the time, effort and energy that the Chief Executive Officer must devote to his position in the current business environment, as well as the commitment required to serve as our Chairman of the Board, particularly as our Board of
Directors oversight responsibilities continue to grow. Our Board of Directors also believes that this structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of our Company and active participation of the independent
directors in setting agendas and establishing priorities and procedures for the work of our Board of Directors.

While our Bylaws and
corporate governance guidelines do not require that our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions be separate, our Board of Directors believes that having separate positions and having an independent outside director serve as
Chairman of the Board is the appropriate leadership structure for us at this time and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance. Our separated Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions are augmented by the
independence of six of our seven directors, and our three entirely independent Board committees that provide appropriate oversight in the areas described above. At executive sessions of independent directors, these directors speak candidly on any
matter of interest, without the Chief Executive Officer or other executives present. The independent directors met three times in 2015 without management present. We believe this structure provides consistent and effective oversight of our
management and the Company.

Director Nominations

The director qualifications developed to date focus on what our Board believes to be essential competencies to effectively serve on the Board
of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must reassess such criteria annually and submit any proposed changes to the Board of Directors for approval. Presently, at a minimum, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
must be satisfied that each nominee it recommends has the highest personal and professional integrity, demonstrates exceptional ability and judgment and shall be most effective, in conjunction with the other nominees to the Board of Directors, in
collectively serving the long-term interests of the stockholders.

In addition to those minimum qualifications, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee recommends that our Board of Directors select persons for nomination to help ensure that:



a majority of our Board is independent in accordance with Nasdaq standards;



each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee be comprised entirely of independent directors; and



at least one member of the Audit Committee shall have the experience, education and other qualifications necessary to qualify as an Audit Committee financial expert as defined by the rules of the SEC.

In addition to other standards the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may deem appropriate from time to time for
the overall structure and compensation of the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider the following factors when recommending that our Board select persons for nomination:



whether a nominee has direct experience in the biotechnology or pharmaceuticals industry or in the markets in which the Company operates; and



whether the nominee, if elected, assists in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background and experience.

Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider whether nominees assist
in achieving a mix of Board members that represents a diversity of background and experience, which is not only limited to race, gender or national origin, we have no formal policy regarding board diversity.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee adheres to the following process for identifying and evaluating nominees for the Board of
Directors. First, it solicits recommendations for nominees from non-employee directors, our Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, third-party search firms or any other source it deems appropriate. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee then reviews and evaluates the qualifications of proposed nominees and conducts inquiries it deems appropriate; all proposed nominees are evaluated in the same manner, regardless of who initially recommended such nominee. In reviewing and
evaluating proposed nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider, in addition to the minimum qualifications and other criteria for Board membership approved by our Board from time to time, all facts and circumstances that
it deems appropriate or advisable, including, among other things, the skills of the proposed nominee, his or her depth and breadth of business experience or other background characteristics, his or her independence and the needs of the Board.

If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee decides to retain a third-party search firm to identify proposed nominees, it has sole
authority to retain and terminate such firm and to approve any such firms fees and other retention terms.

Each nominee for election
as director at the 2016 Annual Meeting is recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and is presently a director and stands for re-election by the stockholders. From time to time, the Company may pay fees to third-party search
firms to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees, although no such fees have been paid in connection with nominations to be acted upon at the 2016 Annual Meeting.

Pursuant to our Bylaws, stockholders who wish to nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors at an annual meeting must be a
stockholder of record at the time of giving the notice, entitled to vote at the meeting, present (in person or by proxy) at the meeting and must comply with the notice procedures in our Bylaws. A stockholders notice of nomination to be made at
an annual meeting must be delivered to our principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting. However, if an annual meeting is more than
30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, the notice must be delivered no later than the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which the first public
announcement of the date of such annual meeting was made. A stockholders notice of nomination may not be made at a special meeting unless such special meeting is held in lieu of an annual meeting. The stockholders notice must include the
following information for the person making the nomination:



name and address;



the class and number of shares of the Company owned beneficially or of record;



disclosure regarding any derivative, swap or other transactions which give the nominating person economic risk similar to ownership of shares of the Company or provide the opportunity to profit from an increase in the
price of value of shares of the Company;



any proxy (other than a revocable proxy given in response to a public proxy solicitation made pursuant to, and in accordance with, the Exchange Act), agreement, arrangement, understanding or relationship that confers a
right to vote any shares of the Company;



any agreement, arrangement, understanding or relationship engaged in for the purpose of acquiring, holding, disposing or voting of any shares of any class or series of capital stock of the Company;



any rights to dividends on the shares that are separate from the underlying shares;

any performance related fees that the nominating person is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of any shares of the Company;



a description of all agreements, arrangements or understandings by and between the proposing stockholder and another person relating to the proposed business (including an identification of each party to such agreement,
arrangement or understanding and the names, addresses and class and number of shares owned beneficially or of record of other stockholders known by the proposing stockholder support such proposed business);



a statement whether or not the proposing stockholder will deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of, in the case of a business proposal, at least the percentage of voting power of all shares of capital
stock required to approve the proposal or, in the case of director nominations, at least the percentage of voting power of all of the shares of capital stock reasonably believed by the proposing stockholder to be sufficient to elect the nominee; and



any other information relating to the nominating person that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement filed with the SEC.

With respect to proposed director nominees, the stockholders notice must include all information required to be disclosed in a proxy
statement in connection with a contested election of directors or otherwise required pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such persons written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to
serving as a director if elected).

For matters other than the election of directors, the stockholders notice must also include a
brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in such business of the stockholder(s) proposing the business.

The stockholders notice must be updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that the information required to be provided in the notice is
true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten business days prior to the meeting.

The Board of
Directors, a designated committee thereof or the chairman of the meeting will determine if the procedures in our Bylaws have been followed, and if not, declare that the proposal or nomination be disregarded. The nominee must be willing to provide
any other information reasonably requested by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in connection with its evaluation of the nominees independence. There have been no material changes to the process by which stockholders may
recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders may send correspondence to the Board of Directors c/o the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices at the address
set forth above. The Secretary will review all correspondence addressed to the Board, or any individual Board member, for any inappropriate correspondence and correspondence more suitably directed to management. Such items may not be forwarded to
the Board or individual Board member, but will be made available to any non-management director upon request. Stockholders may also communicate online with our Board of Directors as a group by accessing our website (www.fatetherapeutics.com) and
selecting the Investors & Media tab.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

Directors are encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting. Three of our directors attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

None of the members of the Compensation Committee is, or has at any time during the past fiscal year been, an officer or employee of the
Company or had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of the members of the Compensation Committee, other than Dr. Rastetter, has formerly been an officer of the Company. Dr. Rastetter served
as our interim Chief Executive Officer from February to October 2012. None of our executive officers serve, or in the past fiscal year, have served as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of any other entity that has one or
more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

Director Compensation

In August 2013, our Board of Directors adopted a non-employee director compensation policy, which became effective upon the completion of our
initial public offering in October 2013, that is designed to provide a total compensation package that enables us to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high-caliber non-employee directors. In April 2014, our Board of Directors adopted
amendments to the policy with respect to the equity component of compensation to our non-employee directors. Under this policy, as amended to date, all non-employee directors are paid cash compensation for service on the Board of Directors and
committees of the Board of Directors as set forth below, prorated based on days of service during a calendar year.

Board of Directors

AnnualRetainer

All non-employee members

$

35,000

Additional retainer for Chairperson

$

35,000

AdditionalAnnualRetainer

Audit Committee:

Chairperson

$

15,000

Non-Chairperson members

$

7,500

Compensation Committee:

Chairperson

$

10,000

Non-Chairperson members

$

5,000

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:

Chairperson

$

7,000

Non-Chairperson members

$

3,500

In addition, under the policy, each new non-employee director who is initially appointed or elected to our
Board of Directors will receive an option grant to purchase up to 20,000 shares of common stock, which will vest in equal annual installments during the three years following the grant date, subject to the directors continued service on our
Board of Directors. Thereafter, on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, each continuing non-employee director will be eligible to receive an annual option grant to purchase up to 10,000 shares of common stock, which will vest in full
upon the earlier of the first anniversary of the date of grant or the date of the following annual meeting of stockholders. All of the foregoing options will be granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the
date of grant.

We have agreed to reimburse all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by non-employee directors in attending Board
and committee meetings.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the compensation earned by our non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015. Mr. Wolchko and Dr. Weyer did not receive compensation for service on the Board of Directors, and the compensation paid to Mr. Wolchko and Dr. Weyer as employees of the Company is set forth under the
heading Compensation of Executive OfficersSummary Compensation Table below.

Name

Fees Earned orPaid in Cash ($)

OptionAwards ($)(1)

All OtherCompensation

Total ($)

William H. Rastetter, Ph.D.(Chairman)(2)

$

84,500

$

47,241

$



$

131,741

John D. Mendlein, Ph.D., J.D.(3)

$

35,000

$

47,241

$

20,000

$

102,241

Timothy P. Coughlin(4)

$

55,000

$

47,241

$



$

102,241

Mark J. Enyedy(5)

$

52,500

$

47,241

$



$

99,741

Amir Nashat, Sc.D.(6)

$

38,500

$

47,241

$



$

85,741

Robert S. Epstein, M.D., M.S.(7)

$

40,000

$

47,241

$



$

87,241

(1)

In accordance with SEC rules, this column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the option awards granted during 2015 computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718 for stock-based compensation transactions (ASC 718). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. These amounts do not reflect the actual economic value that may be realized by the directors upon the vesting of the stock options, the exercise of the stock options or the sale of the
common stock underlying such stock options.

(2)

Dr. Rastetter held stock options to purchase an aggregate of 48,461 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2015.

(3)

Fees earned in cash by Dr. Mendlein in 2015 consist of (i) $20,000 in fees paid pursuant to a consulting agreement with Dr. Mendlein unrelated to his service as a director and (ii) $35,000 in fees
paid to Dr. Mendlein in connection with his service as a director. Dr. Mendlein held stock options to purchase an aggregate of 80,023 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2015.

(4)

Mr. Coughlin held stock options to purchase an aggregate of 43,076 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2015.

(5)

Mr. Enyedy held stock options to purchase an aggregate of 50,769 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2015.

(6)

Dr. Nashat held stock options to purchase an aggregate of 20,000 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2015.

(7)

Dr. Epstein held stock options to purchase an aggregate of 40,000 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2015.

Required Vote

The nominees receiving the
highest number of affirmative votes of all the votes properly cast shall be elected as director to serve until the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote FOR the election of the nominees listed above.

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for
2016. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will attend the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Companys organizational documents do not require that the stockholders ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as
the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, and stockholder ratification is not binding on the Company, the Board or the Audit Committee. The Company requests such ratification, however, as a matter of good corporate practice.
Our Board, including our Audit Committee, values the opinions of our stockholders and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we
will consider our stockholders concerns and evaluate what actions may be appropriate to address those concerns, although the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may still retain Ernst & Young LLP.

The following table shows information about fees billed to the Company by Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP

2015

2014

Audit Fees(1)

$

372,179

$

294,804

Audit Related Fees





Tax Fees

$

59,232

$

65,031

All Other Fees





Total

$

431,411

$

359,835

(1)

Includes fees associated with the annual audit of our financial statements, the reviews of our interim financial statements and the issuance of consent and comfort letters in connection with registration statements.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, retention and termination, and for determining the compensation, of the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee shall pre-approve all auditing services and the terms thereof and non-audit services (other than non-audit services prohibited under Section 10A(g) of the
Exchange Act or the applicable rules of the SEC or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board), except that pre-approval is not required for the provision of non-audit services if the de minimus provisions of Section 10A(i)(1)(B)
of the Exchange Act are satisfied. The Audit Committee may delegate to the chairperson of the Audit Committee the authority to grant pre-approvals for audit and non-audit services, provided such approvals are presented to the Audit Committee at its
next scheduled meeting. All services provided by Ernst & Young LLP during fiscal year 2015 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the pre-approval policy described above, and all audit-related fees, tax fees and
other fees during the fiscal year 2015 were approved by the Audit Committee.

Required Vote

The ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the
proposal at the Annual Meeting.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

The names of the executive officers of the Company, their ages as of March 1, 2016, and certain other information about them are set
forth below (unless set forth elsewhere in this Proxy Statement).

Name

Age

Position

J. Scott Wolchko

46

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Daniel D. Shoemaker, Ph.D.

48

Chief Scientific Officer

Stewart Abbot, Ph.D.

49

Chief Development Officer

Cindy R. Tahl, J.D.

43

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

The biographies of our executive officers, other than Mr. Wolchko, whose biography is set forth above,
appear below.

Daniel D. Shoemaker, Ph.D. has served as our Chief Scientific Officer since May 2015 and oversees our
discovery and preclinical research efforts. He previously served as our Chief Research Officer from January 2015 to May 2015, and as our Chief Technology officer from February 2009 to January 2015. From 2005 to 2009, Dr. Shoemaker was Chief
Scientific Officer of ICxBiosystems, a biotechnology firm that develops advanced detection technologies for use in biodefense, cancer and prenatal diagnostics. From 2003 to 2005, he was Chief Scientific Officer of GHC Technologies, a biotechnology
company. From 1998 to 2003, Dr. Shoemaker held several positions at Merck Research Laboratories, including Director of Target Discovery, Senior Director at Rosetta Inpharmatics and research fellow in the Department of Molecular Neurosciences,
where his main focus was on target identification and biomarker discovery. Dr. Shoemaker received his Ph.D. in biochemistry from Stanford University and his B.S. in biochemistry from the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Stewart Abbot, Ph.D., has served as our Chief Development Officer since October 2015. Prior to that, Dr. Abbot served as
our Vice President of Translational Research from July 2015. Previously, Dr. Abbot was Executive Director of Integrative Research at Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (CCT) from January 2013 to July 2015, where he led research
activities for CCT that encompassed technology and product scouting, alliance identification and business development activities, including initiation of engineered T cell programs. He was Executive Director of Research at CCT from January 2010 to
January 2013, and Senior Director of Research at CCT from June 2007 to December 2010. In these roles, Dr. Abbot led a group that developed novel therapeutic candidates based on hematopoietic stem cells and human placenta-derived cells and
initiated clinical trials for placental cells. Prior to CCT, Dr. Abbot led General Electrics Molecular and Cellular Biology research laboratory at its Global Research Center in Albany, NY. Dr. Abbot received his Ph.D. in pathology
from the University of London, his M.Sc. in biomedical engineering from the University of Strathclyde, and his B.Sc. in biological sciences from the University of Edinburgh.

Cindy R. Tahl, J.D., has served as our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2015. She previously served as our
Vice President, IP and Senior Corporate Counsel since December 2013. From 2009 to 2013, Ms. Tahl served as our Senior Director, Intellectual Property and Corporate Counsel. From 2007 to 2009, Ms. Tahl was a technology transactions attorney
at the law firm of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, P.C, and from 2004 to 2007 practiced intellectual property law in the New York office of Kenyon & Kenyon, LLP. Ms. Tahl received her J.D. from Boston College Law School and her
B.S. in biology from the University of California, San Diego.

The biography of our former President and Chief Executive Officer,
Dr. Weyer, appears below.

Christian Weyer, M.D., M.A.S. served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a
director from October 2012 until November 2015. Dr. Weyer joined us after a 12-year tenure with Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Amylin), a biopharmaceutical company, where he most recently served as Senior Vice President of
Research and Development until the completion of Amylins acquisition by Bristol-Myers Squibb in August 2012. During his tenure with Amylin, Dr. Weyer also served as Vice President of Medical Development and Vice President of Corporate
Development. Prior to joining Amylin, he spent three years, from 1997 to 2000, with the National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, in Phoenix, Arizona, where he conducted clinical research on the pathogenesis of obesity and Type 2 diabetes.
Dr. Weyer holds an M.D. from the University of Düsseldorf, Germany, and a postdoctoral M.A. in clinical research from the University of California, San Diego.

The following
table presents information regarding the total compensation earned by each individual who served as our chief executive officer at any time during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and our two other most highly compensated executive
officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2015. We refer to these officers in this Proxy Statement as our named executive officers. The following table also sets forth information regarding total compensation awarded
to, earned by and paid to each of our named executive officers during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

Name and Principal

Position
as of

December 31, 2015

Year

Salary($)

StockAwards($)(1)(2)

OptionAwards($)(2)

Non-EquityIncentive PlanCompensation($)(3)

All OtherCompensation($)

Total($)

Christian Weyer, M.D., M.A.S.,

2015

366,027



341,020





707,047

Former President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(4)

2014

350,000

26,250

510,080

78,750



965,080

J. Scott Wolchko,

2015

351,795

451,344

(5)

238,714

54,944



1,096,797

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

2014

310,000

13,950

433,568

41,850



799,368

Daniel D. Shoemaker, Ph.D.,

2015

317,555

349,965

(6)

238,714

50,563



956,797

Chief Scientific Officer

2014

265,000

11,923

433,568

48,510



759,001

Stewart Abbot, Ph.D.,

2015

145,260

206,803

(7)

567,182

20,806

80,000

(8)

1,020,051

Chief Development Officer

2014













(1)

Annual incentive compensation awarded in 2016 for performance during the year ended December 31, 2015 was paid in the form of cash and stock issued under the Companys 2013 Stock Option and Incentive Plan,
with such stock being subject to certain transfer restrictions. Such incentive compensation paid to each of the named executive officers (except for the Chief Executive Officer) for performance during the year ended December 31, 2015
consisted of 65% paid in cash and 35% paid in restricted stock at a price equal to $2.90 per share, the closing price of our common stock as reported on NASDAQ on January 8, 2016. The incentive compensation paid to the Chief Executive
Officer for performance during the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted of 65% paid in cash and 35% paid in restricted stock at a price equal to $2.70 per share, the closing price of our common stock as reported on NASDAQ on
January 12, 2016. Details regarding these bonus payments are described below under Bonuses. The amounts of these awards were determined based upon the achievement of performance metrics related to the Companys 2015
corporate objectives, including objectives pertaining to the Companys advancement of its clinical and preclinical programs and achievement of its corporate development and financing initiatives. Amounts in this column include (a) the
portions of the above-described incentive compensation paid in the form of restricted stock and (b) the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted to each individual in 2015.

(2)

In accordance with SEC rules, this column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock units or option awards, as applicable, granted during 2015 computed in accordance with ASC 718. Assumptions
used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. These amounts do not reflect the actual
economic value that may be realized by the named executive officer upon the vesting of the restricted stock units or stock options, as applicable, the exercise of the stock options or the sale of the common stock underlying such restricted stock
units or stock options, as applicable.

(3)

The amounts in this column represent the portion paid in cash of the annual incentive compensation for performance during 2015, as described in footnote (1) above.

Dr. Weyer voluntarily resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer (including his role as the Companys principal executive officer) effective November 30, 2015, and his salary was pro-rated
accordingly. The amount disclosed for Dr. Weyer under Stock Awards represents the portion paid in cash of his annual incentive compensation for performance during 2014.

(5)

Mr. Wolchko received $29,581 of restricted stock and $421,763 of restricted stock units.

(6)

Dr. Shoemaker received $27,225 of restricted stock and $322,740 of restricted stock units.

(7)

Dr. Abbot received $11,203 of restricted stock and $195,600 of restricted stock units.

(8)

Consists of (a) a sign-on bonus of $60,000 paid to Dr. Abbot upon the commencement of his employment and (b) $20,000 in relocation expenses paid to Dr. Abbot in 2015.

Bonuses. In January 2015, the Board of Directors adopted the Companys Amended and Restated Senior Executive Incentive Bonus
Plan (the Bonus Plan), which applies to certain key executives (the Executives), that are recommended by the Compensation Committee and selected by the Board of Directors. The Bonus Plan provides for bonus payments based upon
the attainment of performance targets established by the Compensation Committee and related to scientific, operational and financial metrics with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries (the Performance Goals), which may
include, among others, revenue; expense levels; business development and financing milestones; total shareholder return; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; net income (loss) (either before or after interest, taxes,
depreciation and/or amortization); changes in the market price of the Companys common stock; economic value-added; sales or revenue, developmental, clinical or regulatory milestones; acquisitions or strategic transactions; operating income
(loss); cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow); return on capital, assets, equity, or investment; stockholder returns; return on sales; gross or net profit levels; productivity; expense efficiency; margins;
operating efficiency; customer satisfaction; clinical trial results; publications; reimbursement decisions; working capital; earnings (loss) per share of the Companys common stock; sales or market shares; number of customers or units of
products sold; and operating income and/or net annual recurring revenue, any of which may be (i) measured in absolute terms or compared to any incremental increase, (ii) measured in terms of growth, (iii) compared to another company
or companies or to results of a peer group, (iv) measured against the market as a whole and/or as compared to applicable market indices and/or (v) measured on a pre-tax or post-tax basis (if applicable). Further, any Performance Goals
may be used to measure the performance of the Company as a whole or a business unit or other segment of the Company, or one or more product lines or specific markets. Any bonuses paid under the Bonus Plan will be based upon objectively determinable
bonus formulas that tie such bonuses to one or more performance targets relating to the Performance Goals. The bonus formulas will be adopted in each performance period by the Compensation Committee and communicated to each Executive. No bonuses
will be paid under the Bonus Plan unless and until the Compensation Committee makes a determination with respect to the attainment of the performance objectives. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may adjust bonuses payable
under the Bonus Plan based on achievement of individual performance goals or pay bonuses (including, without limitation, discretionary bonuses) to Executives under the Bonus Plan based upon such other terms and conditions as the Compensation
Committee may in its discretion determine. The bonuses payable under the Bonus Plan may be paid in equity or cash.

Equity Incentive
Compensation. We generally grant stock options to our employees, including our named executive officers, in connection with their initial employment with us. We also have historically granted stock options on an annual basis as part of
annual performance reviews of our employees. During 2015, the Company granted restricted stock units to certain employees and executives. The restricted stock units vest 50% after two years of continuous service from the date of grant, and the
remaining 50% vest after four years of continuous service from the date of grant.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2015 with respect to our
named executive officers.

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Number ofSecuritiesunderlyingUnexercisedOptions(#)Exercisable

Number ofSecuritiesunderlyingUnexercisedOptions(#)Unexercisable

OptionExercisePrice($)

OptionExpirationDate

Number ofshares orunits ofstock thathave notvested (#)

Market valueof shares orunits of stockthat have notvested ($)(9)

J. Scott Wolchko,

31,637

(1)



(1)

1.63

2/8/2022

86,250

(2)

290,663

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

26,400

(1)



(1)

1.63

2/8/2022

3,376

(3)

2,992

(3)

1.37

7/23/2022

5,174

(4)

4,672

(4)

7.87

8/11/2023

46,041

(5)

38,959

(5)

6.62

1/8/2024

16,041

(6)

53,959

(6)

4.84

1/4/2025

Christian Weyer, M.D., M.A.S.,

110,338

(1)



(1)

1.37

2/29/2016

Former President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

190,885

(1)



(1)

1.37

2/29/2016

52,083

(1)



(1)

6.62

2/29/2016

20,833

(1)



(1)

4.84

2/29/2016

Daniel D. Shoemaker, Ph.D.,

31,784

(1)



(1)

1.63

2/8/2022

66,000

(2)

222,420

Chief Scientific Officer

19,200

(1)



(1)

1.63

2/8/2022

17,302

(3)

2,992

(3)

1.37

7/23/2022

5,174

(4)

4,672

(4)

7.87

8/11/2023

46,041

(5)

38,959

(5)

6.62

1/8/2024

16,041

(6)

53,959

(6)

4.84

1/4/2025

Stewart Abbot, Ph.D.,



(7)

70,000

(7)

6.90

8/2/2015

40,000

(2)

134,800

Chief Development Officer

2,916

(8)

67,084

(8)

4.89

10/15/2025

(1)

All outstanding options were fully vested as of December 31, 2015.

(2)

50% of the restricted stock units vest on October 12, 2017, and the remaining 50% vest on October 12, 2019. This grant is subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control of the Company and in the event
of termination of employment under certain circumstances following a change of control of the Company.

(3)

The shares underlying this option vest in equal monthly installments over four years from July 3, 2012 through July 3, 2016. This grant is subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control of the Company
and in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances following a change of control of the Company.

(4)

63% of the shares underlying this option vest in equal monthly installments over four years from October 4, 2013 through October 4, 2017 and 37% of the shares underlying this option vest in equal monthly
installments over two years from December 15, 2014 through December 15, 2016.

(5)

The shares underlying this option vest in equal monthly installments over four years from October 4, 2013 through October 4, 2017.

(6)

The shares underlying this option vest in equal monthly installments over four years from January 5, 2015 through January 5, 2019.

(7)

25% of the shares underlying this option vest on July 13, 2016, while the remaining 75% of shares underlying this option vest in equal monthly installments from August 13, 2016 through July 13, 2019. This
grant is subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control of the Company and in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances following a change of control of the Company.

(8)

The shares underlying this option vest in equal monthly installments over four years from October 12, 2015 through October 12, 2019. This grant is subject to accelerated vesting upon a change of control of the
Company and in the event of termination of employment under certain circumstances following a change of control of the Company.

(9)

This amount reflects the closing market price of a share of our common stock of $3.37 as of December 31, 2015, multiplied by the amount shown in the column Stock Awards  Number of shares or units of stock
that have not vested.

We have established a 401(k) plan to allow our employees to save on a tax-favorable basis for their retirement. We do not match any
contributions made by any employees, including our named executive officers, pursuant to the plan. We also pay, on behalf of our employees, a portion of the premiums for health, life and disability insurance.

Employment Arrangements with Our Named Executive Officers

We consider it essential to the best interests of our stockholders to foster the continuous employment of our key management personnel. In this
regard, we recognize that the possibility of a change in control may exist and that the uncertainty and questions that it may raise among management could result in the departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of the Company
and our stockholders. In order to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of certain key members of management, we have entered into written employment agreements with certain of our named executive officers that, while
at-will, contain certain change in control and severance provisions. A summary of such provisions is below.

Christian Weyer, M.D.,
M.A.S.

Dr. Weyer entered into an at-will employment agreement with us on October 2, 2012 and commenced employment with
us on October 8, 2012. Dr. Weyer voluntarily resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer (including his role as the Companys principal executive officer) effective November 30, 2015. Beginning with the calendar year 2013,
Dr. Weyer was considered annually for a bonus target of up to 50% of his then-current base salary, as determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee.

Payments Provided upon a Change of Control or Termination for Good Reason or Without Cause

Dr. Weyers employment was at will. In the event of termination for good reason or without cause, Dr. Weyer was entitled to
receive (i) the amount of his accrued but unpaid salary, earned but unpaid bonus, and any accrued but unused vacation as of the date of termination, (ii) reimbursement of any expenses properly incurred on behalf of the Company prior to any
such termination and not yet reimbursed, (iii) continuation of his base salary for a period of twelve months after the effective date of termination, provided that such payments was to be reduced dollar-for-dollar by any amounts received from
employment or self-employment during the severance period if such termination occurs before a change of control, and (iv) to the extent authorized by and consistent with COBRA, continuation of group health plan benefits, with the cost of such
benefits shared in the same relative proportion by the Company and Dr. Weyer until the earlier of (x) twelve months after termination and (y) the date Dr. Weyer was to become eligible for benefits through another employer or
otherwise becomes ineligible for COBRA. Entitlement to the benefits set forth in each of (iii) and (iv) above were subject to the execution and non-revocation of a separation agreement, including a release of claims against the Company and
related persons and entities, resignation from any and all positions with the Company and our affiliates and return of all Company property.

In addition, (i) in the event of a change of control, 50% of any unvested shares underlying options subject to time-based vesting granted
pursuant to the terms of Dr. Weyers employment agreement shall vest immediately prior to such change of control and (ii) in the event that Dr. Weyers employment was terminated without cause or for good reason at any time
following a change of control, all unvested shares underlying options subject to time-based vesting granted pursuant to the terms of Dr. Weyers employment agreement were to immediately vest. In the event that Dr. Weyers
employment was terminated without cause or for good reason at any time after the earlier to occur of the transaction milestone (as defined in Dr. Weyers employment agreement) or a change of control, all unvested shares
underlying the option that is subject to vesting upon a transaction milestone or change of control granted pursuant to the terms of Dr. Weyers employment agreement were to immediately vest. Any portion of the options granted to
Dr. Weyer pursuant to the terms of his employment

agreement that was (i) unvested but eligible for continued or accelerated vesting and (ii) not assumed or substituted on substantially the same terms by the acquirer in connection with
such change of control, was to be converted into the right to receive the consideration payable to holders of common stock of the Company in connection with such change of control, which right will be subject to the vesting and acceleration
provisions applicable to such option. Upon the closing of a change of control, Dr. Weyers performance-based option were to terminate with respect to the number of performance-based option shares for which each applicable exit value is not
achievable.

Under Dr. Weyers employment agreement, the terms below were generally defined as follows:

cause means: (i) embezzlement, misappropriation of material assets or property of the Company; (ii) the
conviction of, or plea of guilty or no contest to a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude, theft or securities laws violations; (iii) ongoing and repeated failure or refusal to perform or neglect of the employees lawful duties and
responsibilities to the Company, which continues after receiving written notice from the Board of Directors and which has not been cured within 30 days of such notice; or (iv) the employees uncured breach of the employment agreement
or related agreements with the Company, which breach, if capable of being cured, is not cured within 30 days of receipt of written notice thereof or within the applicable notice and cure periods, if any, provided in the applicable agreement;

change of control means (i) the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company; (ii) the
acquisition of the Company by means of any transaction or series of related transactions in which the Companys stockholders immediately prior to such transaction hold less than 50% of the voting power of the surviving or acquiring entity; or
(iii) the sale, conveyance or other disposal of all or substantially all of the property or business of the Company; provided that a change of control will not include (x) a merger or consolidation with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, (y) a merger effected exclusively for the purpose of changing the domicile of the Company or (z) any transaction or series of related transactions principally for bona fide equity financing purposes in which the Company is the
surviving corporation; and

good reason means that the employee has complied with the appropriate notice
procedures following the occurrence of any of the following without the employees express prior written consent: (i) the material diminution in the employees responsibilities, authority and function; (ii) a material reduction
in the employees base salary that is not pursuant to a salary reduction program affecting substantially all senior level employees of the Company that does not affect the employee to a greater extent than other similarly situated employees; or
(iii) a change in the employees workplace location of more than 50 miles except for required travel on Company business.

J. Scott Wolchko

Mr. Wolchko entered into an at-will employment agreement and commenced employment with us on September 17, 2007. The employment
agreement was amended on November 11, 2008. On January 12, 2016, in connection with his appointment as President and CEO, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Wolchko (the CEO Employment Agreement), which
superseded his prior employment agreement with us. Pursuant to the CEO Employment Agreement, Mr. Wolchko is eligible to receive annual incentive compensation, for which the initial target annual incentive compensation will be 50% of his
then-current annual base salary, as determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee.

Payments Provided upon a
Change of Control or Termination for Good Reason or Without Cause

Mr. Wolchkos employment is at-will. Upon
any termination of his employment, Mr. Wolchko will be entitled to receive (i) the amount of his accrued but unpaid salary and unpaid expense reimbursements and any accrued but unused vacation as of the date of termination, (ii) any
vested benefits Mr. Wolchko may have under any employee benefit plan, which shall be paid in accordance with the terms of such employee benefit plans, as of the date of termination, and (iii) any earned but unpaid incentive compensation
from the prior calendar year.

In the event that Mr. Wolchkos employment is terminated by the Company without Cause
or by Mr. Wolchko for Good Reason (as such terms are defined below), subject to his execution of a separation agreement and release, Mr. Wolchko will be entitled, in addition to the amounts described in clauses (i) through
(iii) of the third paragraph hereunder, to (i) a cash payment equal to the sum of twelve (12) months of Mr. Wolchkos then-current base salary and his annual target incentive compensation in the year of termination,
(ii) full acceleration of the vesting provisions of all outstanding stock options or other stock-based awards containing performance-based vesting conditions, if such performance-based vesting condition has been satisfied as of the date of
termination, and (iii) payment of the premiums for Mr. Wolchkos and his familys participation in the Companys group health care plans, subject to Mr. Wolchkos copayment amount, for up to twelve (12) months
after termination.

In the event that Mr. Wolchkos employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Wolchko
for Good Reason within three months prior to and eighteen (18) months after a Sale Event (as such term is defined below), subject to his execution of a separation agreement and release, Mr. Wolchko is entitled, in addition to the amounts
described in clauses (i) through (iii) of the third paragraph hereunder, to (i) a cash payment equal to the sum of eighteen (18) months of Mr. Wolchkos then-current base salary and 1.5 times his annual target incentive
compensation in the year of termination, (ii) full acceleration of the vesting provisions of all outstanding stock options or other stock-based awards; provided, that for any stock options or awards that include a performance-based vesting
condition, no acceleration will be provided unless the performance-based vesting condition has been satisfied as of the date of Mr. Wolchkos termination, and (iii) payment of the premiums for Mr. Wolchkos and his
familys participation in the Companys group health care plans, subject to Mr. Wolchkos copayment amount, for up to eighteen (18) months after termination.

Under the CEO Employment Agreement, the terms below are generally defined as follows:

Cause means, (i) conduct by the employee constituting a material act of misconduct in connection with the
performance of the employees duties, including, without limitation, misappropriation of funds or property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates other than the occasional, customary and de minimis use of Company
property for personal purposes; (ii) the commission by the employee of (A) any felony; or (B) a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, deceit, dishonesty or fraud; (iii) any conduct by the employee that would reasonably be
expected to result in material injury or reputational harm to the Company or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates if the employee were retained in the employees position; (iv) continued material and substantial non-performance by the
employee of the employees material responsibilities hereunder (other than by reason of the employees physical or mental illness, incapacity or disability) which has continued for more than 30 days following written notice of such
non-performance from the Board; (v) a material and substantial breach by the employee of any of the employees confidentiality, noncompetition, nonsolicitation or other similar restrictive covenant obligations to the Company; (vi) a
material and substantial violation by the employee of any of the Companys written employment policies; or (vii) failure to cooperate with a bona fide internal investigation by or on behalf of the Board or an authorized committee thereof
or an investigation by regulatory or law enforcement authorities, after being instructed by the Company to cooperate, or the willful destruction or failure to preserve documents or other materials known to be relevant to such investigation or the
inducement of others to fail to cooperate or to produce documents or other materials in connection with such investigation.

Sale Event means (i) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company on a consolidated basis
to an unrelated person or entity, (ii) a merger, reorganization or consolidation pursuant to which the holders of the Companys outstanding voting power and outstanding stock immediately prior to such transaction do not own a majority of
the outstanding voting power and outstanding stock or other equity interests of the resulting or successor entity (or its ultimate parent, if applicable) immediately upon completion of such transaction, (iii) the sale of all of the common stock
of the Company to an unrelated person, entity or group thereof acting in concert, or (iv) any other transaction in which the owners of the Companys outstanding voting power immediately prior to such

transaction do not own at least a majority of the outstanding voting power of the Company or any successor entity immediately upon completion of the transaction other than as a result of the
acquisition of securities directly from the Company; and

Good Reason means that the employee has complied with
the appropriate notice process following the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) a material diminution in the employees responsibilities, authorities, powers, functions or duties; (ii) a material reduction in the
employees then-current Base Salary or target annual incentive compensation, except for across-the-board reductions based on the Companys financial performance similarly affecting all or substantially all senior management employees of
the Company; or (iii) the relocation of the employees principal place of business to a place that is more than twenty-five (25) miles from the employees current location of employment as of the effective date of the employment
agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the following shall be considered good reason: (x) the mere occurrence of a Sale Event; (y) any change in the identity of the surviving corporation in the event of a Sale Event; or
(z) any change in the status of the surviving corporation after a Sale Event as a public or private Company.

Daniel D.
Shoemaker, Ph.D.

Dr. Shoemaker is a party to an at-will employment offer letter with us, dated February 11, 2009 (the
Shoemaker Offer Letter). Pursuant to the Shoemaker Offer Letter and the Bonus Plan, Dr. Shoemaker is eligible to receive annual incentive compensation at a target percentage of his then-current annual base salary, as determined by
the Board or the Compensation Committee.

Payments Provided upon a Change of Control or Termination for Good Reason or
Without Cause

Dr. Shoemakers employment is at-will. Pursuant to the Shoemaker Offer Letter, if, within twelve
(12) months after a Change of Control (as defined in the Companys 2007 Equity Incentive Plan), Dr. Shoemakers employment with the Company is terminated at any time without Cause or for Good Reason, he is entitled to receive
(i) a cash payment equal to six (6) months of his then-current base salary and (ii) reimbursement for six (6) months of COBRA benefits.

Under the Shoemaker Offer Letter, the terms above are generally defined as follows:

Cause means (i) conviction of any felony or any crime involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude under the
laws of the United States or any state thereof; (ii) attempted commission of, or participation in, a fraud against the Company; (iii) material violation of any contract or agreement between Dr. Shoemaker and the Company or any
statutory duty owed to the Company, unless such violation is cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the Company within ten (10) days after the delivery to Dr. Shoemaker of written notice specifying such violation; or (iv) repeated or
habitual drug or alcohol use that materially and adversely interferes with the performance of Dr. Shoemakers services to the Company.

Change of Control means (i) the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company; (ii) the acquisition of the
Company by means of any transaction or series of related transactions (including, without limitation, any reorganization, merger, share exchange or consolidation) provided that the applicable transaction shall not be deemed a Change of Control
unless the Companys stockholders constituted immediately prior to such transaction hold less than fifty percent (50%) of the voting power of the surviving or acquiring entity; or (iii) the sale, conveyance or other disposal of all or
substantially all of the property or business of the Company; provided that a Change of Control shall not include (x) a merger or consolidation with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, (y) a merger effected exclusively for the purpose of
changing the domicile of the Company or (z) any transaction or series of related transactions principally for bona fide equity financing purposes in which the Company is the surviving corporation.

Good Reason means compliance with the Good Reason Process
(as defined below) following the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) a reduction by fifteen (15) or greater percent by the Company or any successor thereof of Dr. Shoemakers then-current base salary (provided however,
that in the event that the base salary of all senior management are similarly reduced, such material reduction will not constitute Good Reason); (ii) a material reduction by the Company or any successor thereof in Dr. Shoemakers kind
or level of employee benefits with the result that his overall benefits package is significantly reduced (provided however, that in the event the benefits of all senior management are similarly reduced, such material reduction will not constitute
Good Reason); or (iii) Dr. Shoemakers relocation to a facility or a location more than fifty (50) miles from the Companys headquarters as of the date of this letter. Notwithstanding the above, none of the following shall
be considered Good Reason: (x) the mere occurrence of a Change of Control; (y) any change in the identity of the surviving corporation in the event of a Change of Control; or (z) any change in the status of the surviving corporation
after a Change of Control as a private or public company.

Good Reason Process means that
(i) Dr. Shoemaker determines in good faith that a Good Reason condition has occurred; (ii) Dr. Shoemaker notifies the Company in writing of the occurrence of the Good Reason condition within sixty (60) days of
the occurrence of such condition; (iii) Dr. Shoemaker cooperates in good faith with the Companys efforts, for a period not less than thirty (30) days following such notice (the Cure Period), to remedy the condition;
(iv) notwithstanding such efforts, the Good Reason condition continues to exist; and (v) Dr. Shoemaker delivers to the Company notice of termination of his employment within sixty (60) days after the end of the Cure Period. If
the Company cures the Good Reason condition during the Cure Period, Good Reason shall be deemed not to have occurred.

Stewart
Abbot, Ph.D.

Dr. Abbot is a party to an at-will employment offer letter with us, dated June 29, 2015 (the Abbot
Offer Letter). Pursuant to the Abbot Offer Letter and the Bonus Plan, Dr. Abbot is eligible to receive annual incentive compensation at a target percentage of his then-current annual base salary, as determined by the Board or the
Compensation Committee.

Payments Provided upon a Sale Event or Termination for Good Reason or for Cause

Dr. Abbots employment is at-will. Upon a Sale Event (as such term is defined in the Companys 2013 Stock Option
and Equity Incentive Plan), Dr. Abbot is entitled to receive acceleration of the vesting provisions of 50% of the then-unvested shares underlying the outstanding stock option to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock that was initially
granted to Dr. Abbot pursuant to the Abbot Offer Letter (the Abbot Option). In addition, if within twelve (12) months after a Sale Event, Dr. Abbots employment with the Company is terminated without Cause or for Good
Reason, he shall receive full acceleration of the vesting provisions of all remaining unvested shares underlying the Abbot Option.

Under
the Abbot Offer Letter, the terms above are generally defined as follows:

Cause means (i) embezzlement,
misappropriation of material assets or property of the Company; (ii) the conviction of, or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony, or any crime involving moral turpitude, theft or the violation of applicable securities laws;
(iii) ongoing and repeated failure or refusal to perform or neglect of Dr. Abbots lawful duties and responsibilities to the Company; or (iv) Dr. Abbots breach of the Abbot Offer Letter or any other agreement with the
Company which breach, if capable of cure, is not cured within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice thereof or otherwise within the applicable notice and cure periods, if any, provided in the applicable agreement.

Good Reason means the occurrence of any of the following actions undertaken by the Company without
Dr. Abbots consent: (i) the material diminution in Dr. Abbots responsibilities, authority and function; (ii) a material reduction in Dr. Abbots base salary, provided, however, that Good Reason will

not be deemed to have occurred in the event of a reduction in Dr. Abbots base salary that is pursuant to a salary reduction program affecting substantially all of the senior level
employees of the Company and that does not adversely affect Dr. Abbot to a greater extent than other similarly situated employees; or (iii) a change in the geographic location of the Companys headquarters of more than fifty
(50) miles.

Sale Event means (i) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company on a
consolidated basis to an unrelated person or entity, (ii) a merger, reorganization or consolidation pursuant to which the holders of the Companys outstanding voting power and outstanding stock immediately prior to such transaction do not own a
majority of the outstanding voting power and outstanding stock or other equity interests of the resulting or successor entity (or its ultimate parent, if applicable) immediately upon completion of such transaction, (iii) the sale of all of the
Companys common stock to an unrelated person, entity or group thereof acting in concert, or (iv) any other transaction in which the owners of the Companys outstanding voting power immediately prior to such transaction do not own at least
a majority of the outstanding voting power of the Company or any successor entity immediately upon completion of the transaction other than as a result of the acquisition of securities directly from the Company.

The number of shares of stock available for issuance under the 2013 Stock Option and Incentive Plan will be automatically increased each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2014, by 4% of the outstanding number
of shares of the Companys common stock on the immediately preceding December 31 or such lesser number as determined by the compensation committee of the Companys Board of Directors.

Other than the compensation agreements and other arrangements described under Compensation of Executive Officers and the
transactions described below, since the beginning of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, there has not been and there is not currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were, or will be, a party in
which the amount involved exceeded, or will exceed, $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of five percent or more of any class of our capital stock or any member of the immediate family of, or entities affiliated with, any of
the foregoing persons, had, or will have, a direct or indirect material interest.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with or have contractual obligations to provide indemnification to each of our directors and
intend to enter into such agreements with certain of our executive officers. These agreements require us, among other things, to indemnify these individuals for certain expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and settlement
amounts reasonably incurred by such person in any action or proceeding, including any action by or in our right, on account of any services undertaken by such person on behalf of the Company or that persons status as a member of our Board of
Directors to the maximum extent allowed under Delaware law.

Restricted Stock and Stock Option Awards

For information regarding stock option awards and other equity incentive awards granted to our named executive officers and directors, see
Election of DirectorsDirector Compensation and Compensation of Executive Officers.

Procedures for Approval of Related
Person Transactions

The Audit Committee conducts an appropriate review of all related party transactions for potential conflict of
interest situations on an ongoing basis, and the approval of the Audit Committee is required for all such transactions. The Audit Committee follows the policies and procedures set forth in our Related Person Transaction Policy in order to facilitate
such review. The Related Person Transaction Policy is written.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by (i) each
director, (ii) each named executive officer, (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group, and (iv) each person who we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock as of March 15, 2016.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities
to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities and include shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable within
60 days after March 15, 2016, but excludes unvested stock options. Except as otherwise indicated, all of the shares reflected in the table are shares of common stock and all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with
respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.

In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed
outstanding shares of common stock subject to options or warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2016. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Shares beneficially owned include restricted shares of common stock acquired upon any early exercise of stock options granted under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

Percentage ownership calculations for beneficial ownership for each person or entity are based on 28,861,711 shares outstanding as of
March 15, 2016.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)

Number ofSharesBeneficiallyOwned as ofMarch 15,2016

Number of RestrictedStock Units VestingorStock OptionsExercisableWithin60 Days ofMarch 15, 2016

Based on Schedule 13D/A filed on June 24, 2015, the ownership of ARCH Venture Fund VI, L.P. (ARCH Fund VI) consists of an aggregate of 2,473,188 shares of common stock. The sole general
partner of ARCH Fund VI is ARCH Venture Partners VI, L.P. (ARCH Partners VI), which may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by ARCH Fund VI. The sole general partner of ARCH Partners VI is ARCH Venture Partners
VI, LLC (ARCH VI LLC), which may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by ARCH Fund VI. The managing directors of ARCH VI LLC are Keith Crandell, Clinton Bybee and Robert Nelsen, and they may be deemed to
beneficially own the shares held by ARCH Fund VI. Each of Messrs. Crandell, Bybee and Nelsen disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. The mailing address of the beneficial owner
is 8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 290, Chicago, IL 60631.

(3)

Based on Schedule 13D filed on October 11, 2013 and consists of: (i) an aggregate of 2,386,464 shares of common stock held by Polaris Venture Partners V, L.P. (Polaris Ventures),
(ii) an aggregate of 46,511 shares of common stock held by Polaris Venture Partners Entrepreneurs Fund V, L.P. (Polaris Entrepreneurs Fund), (iii) an aggregate of 16,347 shares of common stock held by
Polaris Venture Partners Founders Fund V, L.P. (Polaris Founders Fund) and (iv) an aggregate of 23,864 shares of common stock held by Polaris Venture Partners Special Founders Fund V, L.P. (Polaris
Special Founders Fund). Each of the funds has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares held by such funds. The general partner of Polaris Ventures, Polaris Entrepreneurs Fund, Polaris Founders Fund and
Polaris Special Founders Fund is Polaris Venture Management Co. V, LLC (Polaris Management), and Polaris Management may be deemed to have sole voting and investment power over such shares. Director Amir Nashat is one of
six members of Polaris Management. He has shared voting and investment power over such shares and may be deemed the indirect beneficial owner of such shares. Dr. Nashat disclaims beneficial ownership over such shares, except to the extent of
any pecuniary interest therein. The members of North Star Venture Management 2010 LLC are also members of Polaris Management, and as members of the general partner, they may be deemed to share voting and investment power over such shares. The
principals of North Star Venture Management 2010 LLC disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares, except to the extent of their proportionate pecuniary interest therein. The mailing address of the beneficial owner is 1000 Winter Street,
Suite 3350, Waltham, MA 02451.

(4)

Based on Schedule 13D filed on October 11, 2013 and consists of: (i) an aggregate of 2,231,558 shares of common stock held by Venrock Associates V, L.P. (Venrock Associates), (ii) an
aggregate of 189,198 shares of common stock held by Venrock Partners V, L.P. (Venrock Partners) and (iii) an aggregate of 52,431 shares of common stock held by Venrock Entrepreneurs Fund V, L.P. (Venrock
Entrepreneurs). The sole general partner of Venrock Associates is Venrock Management V, LLC (Venrock Management V). The sole general partner of Venrock Partners is Venrock Partners Management V, LLC (Venrock
Partners Management V). VM5, VPM5 and VEFM5 disclaim beneficial ownership over all shares held by Venrock, Venrock Partners and Venrock Entrepreneurs, except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. The sole general partner of Venrock
Entrepreneurs is VEF Management V, LLC (VEF). Director William H. Rastetter, Ph.D. was formerly a partner of Venrock Associates, but does not have voting or investment control over the shares held by the Venrock entities. The
mailing address of the beneficial owner is 3340 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304.

(5)

Based on Schedule 13G/A filed February 16, 2016, the ownership of Redmile Group, LLC (Redmile) consists of an aggregate of 2,371,001 shares of common stock owned by certain investment limited
partnerships, pooled investment vehicle(s), separately managed accounts, etc. for which Redmile serves as the general partner and/or investment manager. Redmile, as the general partner and/or investment manager to the limited partnerships, pooled
investment vehicle(s), separately managed accounts, etc. and Jeremy Green, as the majority managing member and owner of Redmile, may therefore be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned by such investment limited partnerships, pooled investment
vehicle(s), separately managed accounts, etc., insofar as they may be deemed to have the power to direct the voting or disposition of those shares. Each of Redmile and Jeremy Green disclaims beneficial ownership as to the shares, except to the
extent of his or its pecuniary interests therein. The mailing address of the beneficial owners is One Letterman Drive, Bldg D, Ste D3-300, San Francisco, CA 94129.

Based on Schedule 13G/A filed on February 12, 2016 and includes: (i) an aggregate of 1,800,706 shares of common stock held by Fidelity Growth Company Fund, and (ii) an aggregate of 1,760,366 shares
of common stock held by Select Biotechnology Portfolio. Abigail P. Johnson and FMR LLC, through its control of Fidelity Management & Research Company, and the funds each has sole power to dispose of the 4,307,485 shares owned by the
funds. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Vice Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the President of FMR LLC. Members of the family of Abigail P. Johnson are the predominant owners of FMR LLC and may be deemed to form a
controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment
Company Act (Fidelity Funds) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management &
Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds Boards of Trustees. The mailing address of the beneficial owner is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210.

(7)

Consists of 168,084 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2016.

(8)

Consists of (i) 83,333 shares of common stock held by The Investment 2002 Trust dated November 11, 2001 (the Investment Trust), (ii) 118,360 shares of common stock held by The Rastetter Family
Trust, dated September 2, 2010 (the Rastetter Family Trust), and (iii) options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2016 held by Dr. Rastetter. William
Rastetter is the sole trustee of the Investment Trust and has sole dispositive power over the shares held by this entity. William Rastetter and Marisa Gard Rastetter, as co-trustees of the Rastetter Family Trust, share dispositive power over the
shares held by this entity.

(9)

Of the 156,744 shares of common stock owned of record by Dr. Mendlein, 26,270 shares are subject to the Companys right of repurchase as of March 15, 2016; of the 51,562 options to purchase shares of
common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2016, 683 shares, if exercised, would be subject to the Companys right of repurchase as of March 15, 2016.

(10)

Consists of 167,607 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2016.

(11)

Consists of 22,608 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2016.

(12)

Includes the number of shares beneficially owned by the executive officers and directors listed in the above table, as well as (i) 53,509 shares of common stock owned of record by Cindy R. Tahl, our General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary and (ii) options to purchase 69,672 shares of common stock that are exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2016 held by Ms. Tahl.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our
equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership (Forms 3, 4 and 5) with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required to furnish us with copies of all such forms which they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on our review of such reports or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all of
the filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors, greater than 10% beneficial owners and other persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act were complied with during the year ended December 31, 2015.

The following Audit Committee Report is not considered proxy solicitation material and is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Companys filings made under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act that might incorporate filings made by the
Company under those statutes, the Audit Committee Report shall not be incorporated by reference into any prior filings or into any future filings made by the Company under those statutes.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the Audit Committee) has furnished this report concerning the independent audit of
the Companys financial statements. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the enhanced independence standards established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rulemaking of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and
the NASDAQ Stock Market regulations. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on the Companys website at http://www.fatetherapeutics.com.

The Audit Committees responsibilities include assisting the Board of Directors regarding the oversight of the integrity of the
Companys financial statements, the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent registered public accounting firms qualifications and independence, and the performance of the Companys internal
audit function and the independent registered public accounting firm.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee
reviewed and discussed the Companys financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 with the Companys management and Ernst & Young LLP. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with
Ernst & Young LLP, with and without management present, their evaluation of the Companys internal accounting controls and overall quality of the Companys financial reporting. The Audit Committee also discussed with
Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114 (formerly SAS 61), as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1 AU section 380), as adopted by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. The Audit Committee also received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526 and
the Audit Committee discussed the independence of Ernst & Young LLP with that firm.

Based on the Audit Committees
review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Companys Annual Report for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015.

The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors have recommended the selection of Ernst & Young LLP
as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.

We have made available a procedure approved by the SEC known as householding. This procedure allows multiple stockholders residing
at the same address the convenience of receiving a single copy of our Notice, Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy materials, as applicable. This allows us to save money by reducing the number of documents we must print and mail, and helps
protect the environment as well.

Householding is available to both registered stockholders (i.e., those stockholders with
certificates registered in their name) and streetname holders (i.e., those stockholders who hold their shares through a brokerage).

Registered
Stockholders

If you are a registered stockholder and would like to consent to a mailing of proxy materials and other stockholder
information only to one account in your household, as identified by you, we will deliver or mail a single copy of our Annual Report and proxy materials for all registered stockholders residing at the same address. Your consent will be perpetual
unless you revoke it, which you may do at any time by contacting the Householding Department of American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (AST), at One Embarcadero Center, Suite 530, San Francisco, CA 94111.

Registered stockholders who have not consented to householding will continue to receive copies of Annual Reports and proxy materials for each
registered stockholder residing at the same address. As a registered stockholder, you may elect to participate in householding and receive only a single copy of Annual Reports or proxy statements for all registered stockholders residing at the same
address by contacting AST as outlined above.

Street Name Holders

Stockholders who hold their shares through a brokerage may elect to participate in householding or revoke their consent to participate in
householding by contacting their respective brokers.

We are not aware of any matters that may come before the meeting other than those referred to in the Notice. If any other matter shall
properly come before the Annual Meeting, however, the persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote all proxies in accordance with their best judgment.

Accompanying this Proxy Statement is our Annual Report. Copies of our Annual Report are available free of charge on our website at
www.fatetherapeutics.com or you can request a copy free of charge by calling Investor Relations at (858) 875-1800 or sending an e-mail request to Investor Relations by accessing our website (www.fatetherapeutics.com), selecting the
Investors & Media tab and then selecting Contact Us. Please include your contact information with the request.

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .  0FATE THERAPEUTICS, INC. Proxy for Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 11, 2016 The undersigned hereby Solicited appoints on Behalf Cindy of R the . Tahl Board as
proxy, of Directors with the power to appoint her substitute, and hereby authorizes her to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side hereof, all the shares of common stock of Fate Therapeutics, Inc. held of record by the undersigned at
the close of business on March 21, 2016 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 11, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time at 3535 General Atomics Court, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92121, and at any adjournment
thereof.(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.)1.1 14475

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OFFATE THERAPEUTICS, INC.May 11, 2016GO GREEN e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent,
you can quickly access your proxy material, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.amstock.com to enjoy online access.NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS:
The Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and proxy card are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/18615/ Please sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as
possible. Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided.  20230000000000000000 0 051116THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A
VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND FOR PROPOSAL 2.PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN FOR HERE AGAINSTx ABSTAIN1. Election of two class III
directors: 2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our NOMINEES: independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year FOR ALL NOMINEES O J. Scott Wolchko ending December 31, 2016.O Timothy P. Coughlin 3. To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any FOR WITHHOLD ALL NOMINEES AUTHORITY adjournments or postponements thereof.FOR ALL EXCEPT In her discretion, the proxy is authorized to vote upon such other business as may
(See instructions below) properly be voted come as directed before herein the Annual by the Meeting. undersigned This Stockholder. proxy, when If properly no direction executed, is made, will this proxy will be voted FOR ALL NOMINEES in
Proposal 1 and FOR Proposal 2.INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark FOR ALL EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:To indicate changes
change your to the the new address registered address on name(s) your in the account, address on the please account space check above. may not the Please be box submitted at note right and that via this method.Signature of Stockholder Date:
Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note: Please title as such. sign exactly If the signer as your is a name corporation, or names please appear sign on full this corporate Proxy. When name
shares by duly are authorized held jointly, officer, each giving holder full should title as sign. such. When If signer signing is a as partnership, executor, please administrator, sign in attorney, partnership trustee name or by guardian,
authorized please person. give full

FATE THERAPEUTICS, INC.May 11, 2016PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONSINTERNETAccess www.voteproxy.com and follow the on-screen
instructions or scan the QR code with your smartphone. Have your proxy card available when you access the web page. TELEPHONECall toll-free 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437) in the United States or 1-718-921-8500 from foreign countries from any
touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. Have your proxy card available when you call.Vote online/phone until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before themeeting. COMPANY NUMBERMAILSign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope
provided as soon as possible. ACCOUNT NUMBER IN PERSONYou may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.GO GREENe-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material,
statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.amstock.com to enjoy online access.NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS: The Notice of Meeting, proxy statement and
proxy card are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/18615/ Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided IF you are not voting via telephone or the Internet.
20230000000000000000 0 051116THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND FOR PROPOSAL 2.PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN FOR HERE AGAINSTx ABSTAIN1. Election of two class III directors: 2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our NOMINEES: independent registered public accounting firm
for our fiscal year FOR ALL NOMINEES O J. Scott Wolchko ending December 31, 2016.O Timothy P. Coughlin 3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any FOR WITHHOLD ALL NOMINEES AUTHORITY adjournments or
postponements thereof.FOR ALL EXCEPT In her discretion, the proxy is authorized to vote upon such other business as may (See instructions below) properly come before the Annual Meeting. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as directed
herein by the undersigned Stockholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR ALL NOMINEES in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposal 2.INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark
FOR ALL EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:JOHN SMITH 1234 MAIN STREET APT. 203 NEW YORK, NY 10038To indicate changes change your to the the new address registered address on name(s)
your in the account, address on the please account space check above. may not the Please be box submitted at note right and that via this method. Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date: Note: Please title as such. sign exactly
If the signer as your is a name corporation, or names please appear sign on full this corporate Proxy. When name shares by duly are authorized held jointly, officer, each giving holder full should title as sign. such. When If signer signing is a as
partnership, executor, please administrator, sign in attorney, partnership trustee name or by guardian, authorized please person. give full