A crash course on the true causes of “antisemitism”

This is a topic which has had so much written about it that you could fill an entire city library with books entirely dedicated to this topic. Marx took a shot at it. As did Sartre. There were, of course, also plenty of good books written on this topic, but rather than list them all, I want to suggest a few simple common sense points and then go to what I consider an authoritative explanation of this thing we call “antisemitism” and which, of course, has nothing to do with Semites.

So first, let’s dump this silly term and replace it by a simple and straightforward one: judeophobia. Just like any other phobia (say, for example, russophobia) the phobia of X is the 1) fear and/or hatred of X. Some people hate Jews, others fear them (think of the “fear of the Jews” in the Scripture), some do both. So judeophobia seems both logical and uncontroversial to me.

Second, it is a truism to say that everything in the universe has a cause. That includes phobias. Including russophobia and judeophobia. For example, I would be the first person to admit that there are objective characteristics of the Russian people which makes other people fear and hate them. Like the fact that all western attempts at conquering Russia have failed. Or that the Russians have always, and still are, rejecting the Papacy. Just these two factors will create plenty of russophobia in the West, for sure.

So, the next thing we can ask ourselves is what is it in Jews which causes judeophobia. Alas, before I look into this, I need to clarify a number of assumptions I make.

The first one is that Jews are not a race or ethnicity. To prove that, I defer to Shlomo Sand’s book “The Invention of the Jewish People”. As I explained elsewhere, Jews are a tribe: A group one can chose to join (Elizabeth Taylor) or leave (Gilad Atzmon). In other words, I see “Jewishness” as a culture, or ideology, or education or any other number of things, but not something rooted in biology. However, I also fully agree with Atzmon when he says that Jews are not a race, but that Jewish culture/politics/ideology is racist (more about that later).

Next, there is also what is commonly known as “Judaism”. That, by the way, is also a misnomer, at least if by “Judaism” you refer the faith of the Old Testament, the faith of the Ancient Israel, the “God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our forefathers”. Modern “Judaism” which was created well after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70AD. Modern “Judaism” ought be to called “Pharisaic Talmudism” and its true creators are Shimon bar Yochia, Maimonides (aka “Rambam” in the video below), Joseph Karo and Isaac Luria. The reason why this religion ought to be referred to as Pharisaic Talmudism is modern Judaism is the continuation of the sect of the Pharisees (the only Jewish sect which survived the destruction of Jerusalem and of the Temple – all modern forms of “Judaism” trace their roots to the Pharisees) and that it’s main source of authority is the Talmud, a collection of writings based on the ideas of the sect of the Pharisees and complied from the beginning of the 2nd century. To separate them from non-religious Jews, some authors have offered the term “Judaic” to describe a person adhering to this faith. Seems reasonable to me.

Here is the key thing, while many modern Jews are non-religious and really members of a self-described Jewish tribe, there is no such thing in history as a “Jewish culture” distinct from Pharisaic Talmudism. Remember that national categories are recent creations from the 18th and 19th centuries. For most of history people defined them in reference to 1) their place of residence or birth 2) their religious affiliation and 3) the identity of the ruler they were subjects of. In contrast, nationality and ethnicity are largely modern concepts. The only thing common to a Jew from the Middle-East, Central Europe and North Africa would be teachings of Pharisaic Talmudism. It is only logical therefore to look at this unique common characteristic to try to identify the causes of the hatred and fear Jews have inspired pretty much everywhere they have ever resided.

Here is what the Simon Wiesenthal Center writes on the page “Why The Jews? The Patterns of Persecution”

Jewish communities existed continuously in Europe for over 2,000 years. Many of these communities were older than the countries in which they existed. Nevertheless, as the countries of Europe developed, Jews were rarely given complete citizenship status. At best they were tolerated as guests. Their social and religious distinctiveness made them persistent targets for persecution; and such persecution, in turn, intensified the cohesiveness of Jewish communities.

The emergence of Christianity as the dominant religion in Europe intensified the persecution of Jews. Since both the religious and political life of Europe became organized around the Christian faith, Jews were seen as outcasts, the deniers and “killers” of Christ. For millions of European Christians, for over 1600 years, the hatred and persecution of Jews was religiously sanctioned. Antisemitism intensified during the l9th and 20th century industrialization of Europe as Jews participated more directly in European economic and social life.

By 1933, the patterns of economic, social, and personal persecution of European Jews were well established. Nazi racial antisemitism and propaganda amplified and manipulated these patterns, ultimately adding one deadly tenet–that all Jews must be eliminated.

This is the garden variety cop-out: they were older, but never given citizenship, they were tolerated as guests, their social and religious distinctiveness made them targets for persecution, then the Christians accused them of killing Christ, antisemitism was religiously sanctioned, then came the Nazis and added their racist propaganda. But it has a grain of truth buried deep inside the rest of the platitudes: “social and religious distinctiveness”. What are we talking about here exactly?

This sounds interesting so let’s immediately delve into it!

The following is a lecture by Rabbi David Bar-Hayim whose biography, and gently smiling face, you can find on Wikipedia. For our purposes, just the first paragraph will be enough. It says that Bar-Hayim is an “Israeli Orthodox rabbi who heads the Shilo Institute (Machon Shilo), a Jerusalem-based rabbinical court and institute of Jewish education dedicated to the Torah of Israel”. Not a lightweight by any means, and a man with established credentials. Now let’s listen to what he has to say.

I strongly encourage you to take the time to carefully listen to his entire lecture (1h47m) to not only convince yourself that my chosen excerpts are not partial or taken out of context, but also to get an emotional “feel” for the man who not only is an articulate speaker who is clearly used to teaching, but who also conveys a coherent picture of a man who gave these topics a great deal of thought and who has to courage to call things by their names rather than to “remain silent” like so many of his “politically correct” colleges.

So here is this lecture:

also, and just in case this lecture would “mysteriously” disappear from YouTube following the publication of my article, I decided to re-upload it here:

Next, here are a key statements from the beginning of this lecture posted along their time-stamp so you can check for their authenticity:

09:20 The Torah teaches that the life of a Jew is more precious than the life of a non-Jew.

10:00 God (HaShem) prefers Jews to non-Jews and gives them a special status.

11:00 The notion that Jews and non-Jews are equally precious to God contradicts the spirit of the Torah from beginning to end.

16:40 According to Shimon bar Yochia (aka Rashbi) “the best of non-Jews should be killed in warfare” because just as Jews cannot know if a snake approaching you is venomous or not, Jews cannot know which non-Jew is a danger to then.

25:16 Jews must assume that it is likely that any non-Jew they meet does not live by the Noahide Laws.

Here an explanation is needed about the so-called “Noahide Laws”. According to Wikipedia (I use it as the hyper-politically-correct source) the Noahide Laws “are a set of imperatives which, according to the Talmud, were given by God as a binding set of laws for the “children of Noah” – that is, all of humanity”. Here are these laws as listed by Maimonides himself:

Prohibition of Idolatry

Prohibition of Blasphemy

Prohibition of Homicide

Prohibition of Sexual Immorality

Prohibition of Theft

Prohibition of Limb of a Living Creature

Imperative of Legal System

Sounds “kinda not modern”, but hey, that is no “worse” than the 10 Commandants, right? Wrong! Wrong for two crucial reasons. First, the penalty for breaking any one of these laws, at least according to Rabbi David Bar-Hayim, is death (listen to the lecture for yourself!). Second, this list uses a euphemism when is speaks of “idolatry”. What is meant here is not some pagan blood ceremony to sacrifice babies to some god of thunder, but “Avodah Zarah”. How do I know that? Listen to the lecture again, the Rabbi is very clear about it. And what exactly is “Avodah Zarah”? It is “foreign worship” or, to put it simply, the religions of the aliens, the others, the nations, the goyim. This is exactly the accusation made by Pharisaic Judaics against Christianity: making “That Man” (the typical Talmudic reference to Christ) into an idol. True, during the Middle-Ages overt references to Christianity were obfuscated and even today to the question whether Avodah Zarah is applicable to Christianity the official answer is wonderfully hypocritical: Christianity is a “special type of avodah zarah is forbidden to Jews but permissible to gentiles, so that a non-Jew who engages in Christian worship commits no sin”. First, this is an explicit modern Jewish admission that those Jews who convert to Christianity are committing a crime deserving the death penalty. But, more importantly, this is clearly a cop-out as this “special type of avodah zarah” has no basis in traditional Pharisaic Talmudic teachings. So this might come as a shock to many, but according to Pharisaic Talmudists, all Christians deserve to be killed for the sin of idolatry. Feel the love…

Now here is the sad part, in the USA these rabidly anti-Christians laws have been proclaimed as the “bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization” by both President Reagan and Congress. And to think that these guys fancy themselves as “Christians”…

I am sure that there are those who are absolutely convinced that what I wrote above is a gross misrepresentation of fact, that there is no way “Judaism” would really teach any such horrors. Think again, and listen to the Rabbi himself:

25:33 Those who do not keep the Seven Noahide Laws are all therefore guilty of a capital offense

25:49 “Avoda Zara”, i.e. idolatry meaning Christianity was the most common offense.

Of course, for those who know anything about Pharisaic Talmudism none of the above will come as any surprise. After all, did the Rabbi not also clearly state that:

16:40 According to Shimon bar Yochia (aka Rashbi) “the best of non-Jews should be killed in warfare” because just as Jews cannot know if a snake approaching you is venomous or not, Jews cannot know which non-Jew is a danger to then.

Non-Jews are explicitly compared to snakes! He also says something similar later in the lecture:

26:15 since you cannot bring a perishing non-Jew to court to establish his guilt, you take a neutral position by neither helping him nor killing him.

You got that? Since, like with snakes, it is impossible to tell a dangerous non-Jews apart from a safe one, you cannot just kill him. For that you need a ruling by a rabbinical court. But saving him is no option either, because he most likely deserves the death penalty (say, for being a Christian). So you do nothing when you see a non-Jew in danger or even perishing. Interestingly enough, the Rabbi is also asked if that kind of non-assistance to a person in danger could not negatively impact the reputation of Jews and he immediately replies:

1:22:00 if not saving a non-Jew makes Jews look bad, then the Jew ought to lie about his motives

So it is okay to let a non-Jew die and, if challenged, just lie about it!

The key concept here is simple: Jews are more important to God and, therefore, to themselves than non-Jews. This is why

1:00:30 there is no requirement to return a lost object to a non-Jew

1:17:40 Jews can brake the sabbath to save a Jew but not a non-Jew because Jews do not consider all lives to be equal

I will stop the examples here. The Rabbi clearly says that the humanistic notion that all humans are equal is contrary to the entire spirit of the Torah. If after that you don’t get it….

What about the so-called Golden Rule about “do unto others”?

What about these:

You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your kinsfolk. Love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD (Leviticus 19:18 )

What is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow: this is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn. (Shabbath folio:31a, Babylonian Talmud)

Did you notice the key caveats “your kindsfolk” and “your fellow”. Pharisaic Talmudism interprets these passages are referring only to fellow Jews and not to the semi-bestial goyim! It is laughable to a Rabbi when he hears a non-Jew saying that all humans were created in the image and likeness of God. Pharisaic Talmudism explicitly contradicts that (and the Kabbalah even more so!). Still don’t agree? Which part of “ the humanistic notion that all humans are equal is contrary to the entire spirit of the Torah” don’t you get?!

The simple truth is that Pharisaic Talmudism (aka modern “Judaism”) is the only religion which teaches a God-revealed racism.

This is hardly a new discovery of mine. Just read Michael Hoffman’s superb magnum opusJudaism Discovered (available on Amazon and on his on his website). In fact, there have been thousands of books already written on this topic, and many are available online for download in various file formats. What makes the video by Rabbi David Bar-Hayim so interesting is that it is 1) official 2) recent 3) that he really confirms it all. But for those who, like myself and, I am sure, many readers here, have known about it for decades, this was absolutely nothing new.

A couple of crucial caveats here: there are many Jews out there (most, I would say) who are totally unaware of all this. Even “Conservative” and “Reform” synagogues don’t preach that too overtly (though sometimes even they do). This kind of religious racism is mostly taught in Orthodox Yeshivas and, of course, in various Haredi institutions in Israel. For these ignorant Jews any such explanations of the causes of antisemitism in world history are not only offensive (blaming the victim) but also completely unfair (“my family never said any such things!”). Second, while this kind of, frankly, demonic teachings have only been taught in religious circles, they nevertheless also have had a deep impact upon the outlook of many (but not all!) secular Jews many of whom might never have been told that all Christians deserve to be executed, but who still will have a profound and almost knee-jerk repulsion towards Christianity. The distance between Rabbi David Bar-Hayim and Sarah Silverman and her famous quote “I hope that Jews did kill Christ, I’d do it again in a second” is very, very short.

Finally, for all the (alas many) bone-headed racists out there, none of that Pharisaic ideology is transmissible by genes so please don’t give me that “all Jews” nonsense. Some Jews do espouse these views, others don’t. Remember, Jews are not a race or ethnicity, they are a tribe. A Jew who completely rejects all this religiously-sanctioned racism about goyims does not somehow still mysteriously carry in himself some “Talmudic bacillum” which can flare up and turn him overnight into a hate-filled racist.

[Sidebar: For whatever it is worth, in my life I have seen more kindness and compassion from (secular) Jews than from my fellow Orthodox Christians. Very often in my life I have had secular Jews being like the Good Samaritan from the Gospel (Luke 10:25-37):

And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?

And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.

Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?

And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

Notice two things: first, Christ frontally debunks the racist interpretation of the words “thy neighbor” and, second, He also clearly commands us how we should treat all of our neighbors.]

So now we have it: the root causes of antisemitism are not to be found in some weird cause-less aberration common to every single nation on earth, but in the teachings of Pharisaic Talmudism. What is exceptionally pernicious is that by what could be referred to as cultural-osmosis non-religious Jews find themselves raised in a secular culture which still holds this kinds of beliefs, minus their external religious trappings.

Furthermore, there are many non-Jews who, when seeing both religious secular Jews equally hostile to their religion and traditions, come to the conclusion that “all Jews” are bad. Throw in enough politicians (on both sides) to bring a flame to this toxic mix and you end up with an inevitable explosion. Hence all the persecutions.

Judeophobia has its roots in the demonic teachings of the sect of the Pharisees whose religiously-sanctioned racism has, unfortunately, permeated the worldview of many secular Jews. As long as Orthodox rabbis will stick to their demented self-worship (this is real idolatry, by the way!), “antisemitism” will continue to “mysteriously” rear its ugly head.

Brecht was right, “’The belly is still fertile from which the foul beast sprang”. He just got the ‘belly’ wrong.

The Saker

The Essential Saker III: Chronicling The Tragedy, Farce And Collapse of the Empire in the Era of Mr MAGA

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to get more info on formatting

(1) Leave the name field empty if you want to post as Anonymous. It's preferable that you choose a name so it becomes clear who said what. E-mail address is not mandatory either. The website automatically checks for spam. Please refer to our moderation policies for more details. We check to make sure that no comment is mistakenly marked as spam. This takes time and effort, so please be patient until your comment appears. Thanks.

(2) 10 replies to a comment are the maximum.

(3) Here are formating examples which you can use in your writing:
<b>bold text</b> results in bold text
<i>italic text</i> results in italic text
(You can also combine two formating tags with each other, for example to get bold-italic text.)
<em>emphasized text</em> results in emphasized text
<strong>strong text</strong> results in strong text
<q>a quote text</q> results in a quote text (quotation marks are added automatically)
<cite>a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited</cite> results in:a phrase or a block of text that needs to be cited
<blockquote>a heavier version of quoting a block of text...</blockquote> results in:

a heavier version of quoting a block of text that can span several lines. Use these possibilities appropriately. They are meant to help you create and follow the discussions in a better way. They can assist in grasping the content value of a comment more quickly.

and last but not least:
<a href=''http://link-address.com''>Name of your link</a> results in Name of your link

(4)No need to use this special character in between paragraphs:&nbsp;You do not need it anymore. Just write as you like and your paragraphs will be separated.The "Live Preview" appears automatically when you start typing below the text area and it will show you how your comment will look like before you send it.

(5) If you now think that this is too confusing then just ignore the code above and write as you like.

A long and difficult video to sit and quietly watch. The Rabbi speaks softly. This I worry about. His smirk is like that of the average Roman Catholic when caught out in a religious discussion. Since he asserts, asserts and asserts no serious comment can be advanced in the public arena. Since he seems to be the only Rabbi speaking on the topic then no Israeli position, backed by Rabbinic authority exists ergo. Israel is ALL for peace with Hamas and will be opening borders, ports etc. Tomorrow Gaza is cleansed by all Jews. GREAT NEWS.

In practice Zionism can’t work unless everyone is classified as Jewish or not. Of course there is no scientific basis for such a classification. It is done according to arbitrary religious “laws” as interpreted by a religious establishment.
These “laws” could also be considered as political doctrines since there is not much of a theological nature in them.

I am Muslim and I must admit this article made me uncomfortable.I am anti-Zionist but not anti-Jews.Let me give some points we find in our holy Quran.
-Prophets Abraham,Isaac,Jacob,Joseph,Moses,Aaron etc are also prophets in Islam !
– the Torah is a holy Book we believe in (as for the Gospels).Of course,the contents are partially different from our Quran because we do think some mistakes were made by scholars of that times.
-We believe in one God wheter you call Him Yahve,God or Allah.
Moreover,it is not a good idea to chose an israeli rabbi as a Jew scholar of the Torah.As for the Talmud that seems to be an awful text I thought it has forbidden the return to the Holy Land BEFORE the arrival of the Messiah.So even though the Talmudists are racist,they do oppose Zionsim.
For all these reasons,I agree with the Saker for his political analysis but I have hesitation when he mentions Jews.

With all due respect I must correct your assertion that Muslims believe in the Gospels (the authentic ones and not the Gospel of their fantasies – the Injil) which they consider forgeries.
If their contents are partially different from your Quran is not because ‘some mistakes were made by scholars of that times’, but because the mistakes made by Judaizing scholars of the time who were denying the divinity of the Christ were introduced in the Quran.
To wit: Waraka (or Waraqah) ibn Nawfal ibn Asad ibn Abd-al-Uzza ibn Qusayy Al-Qurashi, a Nestorian priest, who studied the Bible under Jews and Christians and allegedly ‘wrote the New Testament in Arabic’. Actually the hadiths say that ‘he used to write the writing with Hebrew letters and ‘would write from the Gospel in Hebrew as much as God wished him to write’. Muslims are at great pains to refute the claim that Waraka was the teacher of Mahomed and the real composer of the Quran.

The thing that bothers me the most about “Pharisaic Talmudism” is its two-tiered ethical system. As I understand it, it endorses any and all forms of deception, fraud, theft, violence and murder as long as the victim is Goyim and the perpetrator Jew. To pick but one example, the “kill the snake before it kills you” doctrine provides jews with a solid religious rationale for murdering their neighbors and seizing their possessions at will.

Events in Palestine over the last 7 decades illustrate this point nicely. The brutality of their methods and the complete lack of mercy or remorse is absolutely chilling.

I dont dispute the information in this article, but despite having coined the expression anglozionism, Saker still hasnt realized how appropriate the expression is. Zionism other than in a very marginalized degree, was never a jewish project. And the antisemitism when Herzl became a zionist, was not the old antisemitism/judeophobia but reflected a new element.
As the Rothschilds rose to great wealth and established themselves in England, the British aristocracy began undermining the conditions ELSEWHERE for the jews. Not in England because all the way back to Oliver Cromwell the intention was to exploit the advantages attainable from the jewish networks and their special talents in finance. But on the same time to prevent that they would see anyone but the British as their primary ally. An overlapping reason to undermine the jews in Britains rival countries was to encourage the establishing of a buffer state in Palestine. This already emerged in the minds of the British elites during the Napoleon era. Napoleon was thinking of encouraging jews to help develop Egypt. The British ridiculed Napoleon for being ‘a Lebniz plagiarist’.
Britain had no interest in developing anything they just wanted to employ the jews as a weapon against France. Leibniz thinking was however based on a positive view of science and human creativity and his philosophy was of an entirely different nature than the British malthusianism. So following him was no reason for ridicule but rather admiration.
Saker like the majority of the commenters seems to have little grasp of 19th century history, which is caused by the British elites obfuscation of the historical science.
I realize it may sound like an insult to Saker but nevertheless it is true. The purpose is to raise his awareness of the missing factors without which later events become misinterpreted.
That said the British had deep knowledge about the jews which they were able to exploit for their geopolitical aims.
They would in my view probably have felt at home in Sakers account.
They also developed deep insights into Islamic history and likewise exploited it to manipulate the muslim countries in an unfavorable manner. I think most of you would agree that had the nominally secular regimes in the ME not been undermined by the anglozionist empire, and had the AZ empire not supported and encouraged radical islamism, the ME would have been much better off today.
The British aristocracy permeaded and largely controlled freemasonry. The Grand Orient was supposed to be revolutionary but the mere fact that the term freemasons is a common denominator for all lodges should make us suspicious against seeing them as independent.
That illuminati came from a jesuit German university is probaby just a deception. Britain used them for the French Revolution but it was the leading British elite figures who organized it from London.
The Protocols of the elders of Sion, which Oleg Platonov discusses in the series Russias Crown of Thorns, he finds to exist in 24 versions. The analysis of which according to Platonov points to freemasons both as creators and as intended audience.
One might add that the text clearly points to the aristocrats as the only party which could save the world from the plotters (who are supposed to have written it!!).
The latest version which the British registered in British Museum and was supposed to have been translated from the next latest version from Russia (where anglophile officials were involved according to some) The translator was a friend of the British monarch who was the top freemason. So where the original really came from ought to be viewed as an unknown while who benefitted is obvious. The large number of variants looks like misdirection.
The aristocrats nomatter of what ethnicity hated the financiers but wanted to retain the advantage of possessing the dominant financial centre. So they needed to make all Britains rivals hate the jews. Since jewish bankers assisted Bismarck and therefore Germany’s unification, the intrigue intensified and the British now were in a hurry to prevent the jews to assimilate in Germany and force them into Zionism.
Houston Chamberlain and Edward Bulwer Lytton strengthened the cultbased strand of German nationalism which became nazism and the Dreyfuss-affaire proved to Herzl that Europe was rising against the jews for reasons assumed irrational and not suspected to have anything to do with Britain despite it being a British plot. Not only directed against the jews but also intended to twart the constructive plans of the Hanotaux regime who wanted to assist development of Africa. To Herzl who was a complete dupe for the British this meant the end of assimilation for the jews. And as you may know he later offered them ten million agents in return for their support for the Israel project. A project already started in Britains interest by Lord Palmerston in 1840. There is much more and goes back to the 1600s but I skip that now. But even the infamous Zabbatai Tsvi had a British connection. You may interpret that in different ways but you cant prove that there was since the 1600s ever a genuinely jewish zionism where there were no other powerful entities involved. The Venetians, so influential in Britain, may or may not have had jewish ancestry way back but if so they already belonged to thecaristocracy and had little in common with the jews Herzl represented.
Going back to the 1830s:The Young Europe could be viewed as a sort of network of NGOs to get a parallell with current phenomena. Branches were in many countries, like Argentina the US, Germany, Italy and several other countries. Established History omits the fact that this was all a British effort to undermine Britains rivals. At a young age Richard Wagner was recruited to young Germany and his career was early on influenced by the already mentioned Bulwer Lytton, whose novel Rienzi became the source for an opera which much later meant a lot to Hitler.
In parallell with the rise of communist ideas also supported by the British elites seeking to direct the main efforts for regime change in Russia, there was a related British support for antijewish sentiments in Germany and a support for nihilistic apocalyptic themes. Both in Germany and in the US. Aimed for the US there emerged from British freemasonry so called evangelical revival a British 19th century concocted version aiming at the evangelicals and which became Christian Zionism. Add the British freemasonic origin of the B’nai B’rit in order to take back control over the runaway colonists of the US. This later spawned the other currently running zionist organisations, so annoying for many anglosaxons who are still ignorant about their origin.

@Wizoz
I wish you meant that you already knew and that what I told you was already clear to you.
But since I believe you mean that you dont feel comfortable with this revision of your ingrown worldview, you hope it aint true. You want it simple. Since the jews are so annoying it couldnt be the case that someone else who felt like you, actually outsmarted them and created the current mess which threatens to bring about the apocalyptic war expected by the Christian Zionists.
This hasnt been understood neither by influential jews nor by their critics.
The British from those eras have gotten away with it and the present generation is not to blame. But the simple worldview upheld by the majority of honest truthseekers at least judging from comment sections doesnt offer much hope for change. The AA empire will be able to retain the jews as their proxies if people dont get it.

Saker, on item #6 of Noachide laws you omitted the verb “eating.” It is needed for understanding.

I want to add my two cents of history to help the understanding of the identity of the contemporary Jews and how they might be different from the biblical Judeans.

Once upon a time there were Judeans who were from the tribe of Judah and lived in the mountains and hills of Judeah which is the land allocated to the tribe of Judah. Benjamites lived there also and so were called Judeans too. As the people became more numerous they populated other fertile areas to the North like the Galilean hills by-passing Samaria which was left to the Samaritans. All these people who spoke a Western form of Aramaic were called Judeans.

A couple of hundred years before Messiah came, the Macabbees warrior priests fought against the Syrian Greek tyrant named Antiochus “Mad” Epiphanies and won. Then they also conquered the Edomites to the South who had settled in Hebron and forced them to circumcise and assimilate into the Judean nation. But these Edomites always conspired together with the Romans to have the upper hand over the Judeans. Two examples prove this point. Herod the Great, the son of an Edomite father and a Nabatean mother, marries Maryam the heiress of the Hasmonean ( Maccabees) dynasty and usurps the throne of Judah in collusion with the Romans. He is guilty of attempting to snuff the Royal seed of Judah in Bethlehem after the visit of the Magii kings to the new born King Messiah. The mention in the scripture by the Pharisees in the gospel of John that they are of Abraham seed but have never been enslaved to anyone betrays their Edomite origin ( not from Judahite stock). Finally, the Encyclopedia Judaica readily admits that Esau (or Edom) is no more because they became assimilated in the Judean nation from the first century BC.

The fulfillment of the Daniel 9 70th week prophecy ended with: the stoning of Steven, the persecution of the messianic Judeans and the Roman destruction of the temple in 70 AD and all the genealogical records were destroyed. After the Bar Kockba rebellion in 135 AD most of the remaining Judeans were dispersed through the lands of the Roman Empire including Judah. However, at the council at Yavne before the disastrous end of the Bar Kochba rebellion, Judaism was born. It is important to understand that Judaism as it exists today results from the irreconcilable split with Messianic Judeans, aka Netzri, at Yavne in 135 AD. [the usage of “Notzri” is reserved for non Judean Christians]

Among other things that puts doubts in the legitimacy of any bloodline claims of the contemporary Jews being the legitimate descendants of the original Judeans, sans the Edomite infiltrators and Trojan horse, is the cultural tradition innovation that Jewishness is inherited through the maternal lineage. This is contrary to what we see in the scriptures. Therefore, it is very questionable to argue for the present Jews as being the bloodline descendants of the biblical Judeans.

Fast forward to Middle Ages, where a very large kingdom of Turkish, Kurdish people converted politically to Judaism. This kingdom was formerly pagan and phallus (fertility) worshippers. Because they were being squeezed by Islam to the South and Christianity to the North they elected to import hundreds of Rabbis from Babylonia to teach the ways of the Babylonian Talmud. These people were so warlike that they extended their dominion to Ukraine and Crimea. Eventually they settled in Russia and Germany and are known as Ashkenazim. Reading from Genesis 10 we find out that these are descendants of Japheth and not of Shem. These are the so called European Jews or white Jews sometimes also called red Jews for their red hair.

Among the most wealthy of these white or red Jews, a family of Bankers arose. Their patriarch’s name was Mayer Amschel. He adopted the name Rothschild for his dynasty which means Red Shield. This Red Shield is the Star of Remphan, Chiun, Moloch, Chemosh, Saturn aka the Star of David, which is not of David but could be the Star of Solomon as it is known in witchcraft and Kabbala. Think of the Rothschild dinasty as a re run of the Herod the Great Dinasty. Think of him as someone that like the king of Tyrus (the fallen angel named Heylel aka HaSatan) and Solomon after him, enriched himself exceedingly by selfish trading.

It is important to mention him because the Balfour declaration promising a home in the lands of Israel, then known as the land of Palestine was written to him. It was written to him by the British who had the mandate over Palestine after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, because Rothschild promised to get the USA involved in WWI to defeat Germany. Therefore the flag of Israel flies the Star of Remphan, Chiun, Saturn, Chemosh, Moloch aka the Star of David.

These Jews started the Bolshevik revolution and massacred the family of the Czar, the Romanov, and tens of millions of Christian Orthodox in the USSR. They declared war on Germany and of course Germany retaliated against them killing a very large number as well. That is part of the reason Germany went to war against the Red Bolsheviks in the USSR.

Finally, the end result was the invasion by Gog in Ezekiel where it says that the invasion is from those originally from the land of the North, Turkey, Kazharia and Kurdistan via Europe to the lands of Israel. Notice that the invasion by Gog takes place when there are no walls and gates and security checkpoints. Therefore the invasion by Gog, Turkey, Ashkenazi and Magog has already happened.

90% of the Jewish in Israel are from Ashkenazi extraction. Some if not most discriminate against Sephardic Jews or any non Ashkenazi Jews. The names and last names that appear to us to be “Jewish” are nothing more than Yiddish a form of German spoken by the Ashkenazi. But these have deceived the world into believing they are the chosen ones and deceived the Christian world into believing that you have to bless them to be blessed.

Rev 3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

If Yeshua says that those of the synagogue of hasatan are fake Judeans and liars who am I to don’t and think otherwise?

On the other hand, Love conquers everything and we know that God is love,. But how can you love your neighbour “Jew” and not tell him that he needs Yeshua as Redeemer and bridegroom? That is hatred! The opposite of love! Some of the Christian Zionists New Pharisees are saying that you can’t know God if you don’t support and subscribe to the Jewish state that calls itself Israel. But Yeshua says those of the synagogue of HaSatan are fake Judeans although they falsely claim to be of such origin.

Wow. Scholarly and logical piece. I did not need to study so deeply to know who is trying to dismantle the US by killing Christianity and promoting One World Governance: The Federal Reserve Board, ACLU, ADL, SPLC, NAACP, Military/Industrial Complex/Deep State, Hollywood, Creators of Las Vegas, pushers/creators of pornography, Banksters of EVERY stripe. These are owned and operated by Jews. Oh did I mention the NFL? Need I say more? Oh, yeah and let’s vindicate the poor Spanish Catholics who, having gotten their country back after kicking out the Muslims, had to fight for their existence with an Inquisition against the Jews.

Please post more such articles with links to videos of Jews expressing their racial genetic superiority etc. The problem is not a few racist Jews like this guy with such views. The problem is about 90% of Jews are racists just like this guy and they have been this way for centuries committing multiple holocausts shoas, against slavs, blacks etc killing and enslaving hundreds of millions in the past 300 to 400 years.

Even though the Saker and I differ profoundly–he is a passionate Orthodox Christian, I am a passionate agnostic, Arcadian, Slavonic Neo-Pagan (still only a partial description)–I can always appreciate a well-crafted argumentative-expository essay and am glad and eager to recognize its author for a job well done.

I’d like to follow up with a few comments after I read all the comments, not an easy task.

Most of my direct experience with Jews has been negative. The one’s I’ve dealt with were intensely arrogant and rabidly racist against any non-Jew, and always playing the victim card when in fact THEY were the victimizers. I was amazed at how they would openly try to steal from myself and others every payday – and revel in it when they managed to be successful. In the military, I found them to be lazy, arrogant … and utter cowards. At the time, however, I never made the connection between their behavior and their tribe – that came much later.

I DO have a number of Jewish heroes: Dr. Henry Makow, Aaron Russo, Brother Nathanael, Myron Fagan, and Benajmin Freedman, to name a few. I don’t have a problem with good Jews who are Warriors for Truth and Freedom.

Who I despise with all my soul are the Zionists and their unrelenting hatred of – and desire to destroy/enslave – everything non-Jewish. It’s almost comedic when you finally notice that pretty much ever piece of legislation, every organization, or proposal to further enslave humanity … has a Jew championing it. Any time you see a person or organization slowly twisting a knife in the soul of our nations and cultures – rotting it from within – the handle of that knife is held by a Jew (a fact they are very proud of – as to them it shows their “superiority” over the goy).

Jews are not hated because of their success (one of their favorite claims); they are hated because they prosper at the *expense* of their host cultures – mainly through theft, corruption, and deception. Jews aren’t producing $1000 flying cars and curing cancer – they are NOT creators – they’re pushing porn, drugs, debauchery, debt serfdom, war, political corruption, cultural corruption, and debt slavery on the populations of the world. Antisemitism is a *learned* response – the more you know about them, the more “anti-semitic” you become.

I find it interesting that when it comes to the Noahide laws, it’s Jews that push pretty much every one of these sins on the “goy”

Prohibition of Idolatry – Television and Music industries – pure Idolatry
Prohibition of Blasphemy – Just look at Hollywood and the anti-God crap that comes out of it
Prohibition of Homicide – That would be Jew-on-Jew – because killing goy is fine
Prohibition of Sexual Immorality – The “affair” website – Ashley Madison – created by two Jews
Prohibition of Theft – The parasitic Banking system IS Jewish – nothing more needs to be said.
Imperative of Legal System – our disastrous switch from Common Law to Mercantile Law

It’s great to see that people are finally starting to wake up to these truths. The question is, “Is it too late?”

” We Jews, we the destroyers, , will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy, because we need a world of our own, a God-World, which it is not in your nature to build.”
— Maurice Samuel
You Gentiles (p. 155)

I am a person who reads occasionally your geopolitical analysis.
I am also a Jew by choice as I converted a few years ago to the Haredi version of Orthodox Judaism.

First of all, although many things this Rabbi is saying is based on theological texts, It is worthwhile mentioning that he belongs to the jewish orthodox zionist (or nationalist) orientation which is not speaking for all orthodox jews. Most Orthodox Jews consider this Rabbi as scholar who cannot be compared to the pillars of the generation (the most outstanding Rabbis) and as a matter of fact, no Religous zionist rabbi belongs to this upper echelon of jewish theologians. They are a new orientation, like there were many in the past that disappeared.

Second, all these laws are applicable when jews are sovereign and when the Halakha is the law of the land. These laws are not applicable in diaspora neither in the present state of Israel. The Haredi version of judaism is of the opinion that only when the Messiah will rule, will it be possible the reinstate these laws and anyway, once the messianic times will arrive, war laws will be obsolete. There are also several laws according to which jews should be put to death but no sensical rabbi advocates for the application of theses laws like these laws that Bar Haim is speaking about. I did not see the full video (I barely have the time) but from what I saw, it was not clear that he is explicitly advocating the application of these laws.

Another thing: in Judaim (halakha) there is no death penalty for maltreating animals of for theft. Not for Jews, and not for non Jews. The death penalty he is talking about does not mean that when you cross a non Jew in peaceful period you can kill him without due process. It’s preposterous. It means that from a spiritual point of view, their judgement is death penalty (if they do not respect the Bnie Noah laws in general, and nore specifically those like avoda zara, murder etc, not simple theft) so in case of war, in Biblical times, Jews were not supposed to be so careful like the IDF today by sending thousands of flyers to save people by notifying in advance where they are going to strike (something I never heard of from any other army). For the sake of the example, for most Jews of the world, also, the spiritual judgement is death as they are transgressing some of the most important jewish laws. But it does not mean that they should be put to death. It means that unless they repent, they will probably die earlier (from disease, accident etc..) that their initially judged.

That being said, I can fully understand that having these rules, even without applying them, make us despicable and explains judeophobia in your eyes. (specially if you were secular and atheist…)

However:

1) There are countless cultures and religions which see themselves as elected or above others. Islam, japanese, brahamins in the indian caste system to name just a few. You can argue that muslims are hated for that, OK. But who hates the Japanese because they feel superior? Asians who hate them do it exclusively because of the 19th and 20th century military aggression. Who in the western world hates the brahamins?
So having an ideology or religion that you perceive as discriminating is not enough to justify hate from the others. There must be something else. If the pigmees, the Mongols (like one of your commentators answered on UNZ) or the Ainus in Japan, had the same belief, nobody would care less.
The “something else” in the case of the Jews is that, if there is a people whose narrative of election most closely matches the Historical facts, they are the most relevant candidates. At least, most people recognize that there is something exceptional in the Jewish history, for the good (judeophiles), or for the bad (judeophobes).
I my opinion, that’s what bothers the most. Many people simply can’t bare that in the Western and Islamic world. Interestingly, in Asia and Sub-Saharan africa (apart the South-African politicians), most people are not bothered by that.

2) My understanding, from other articles you wrote, is that you are a Christian and Orthodox. If my assumption is correct, there is something I do not understand in your main argument. (By the way, this is an argument only intended for believers and, more particularly, Christians)

I can totally understand that a secular atheist considers the Jews as being racist/discriminating/tribal for considering themselves as a “light onto the nations”, for having a book that called for genociding the Canaanites and the Amalekites, for having a book that explicitly mentions that when you go to war there are no Geneva conventions (although it is not applicable today).

But if you are a Christian, the ancient/old testament (I am not talking about the Talmud) has some value, as I learned when I was myself following catechism lessons in my childhood. It’s the word of G.od for you, even if you think that it was replaced by the new testament. So, basically, if you’re a Christian and you are arguing along your lines, you are criticizing the word of God, even if something had replaced it afterwards.

And even if the Talmud nuances or goes a further than what is written in the Old testament, the core is from the ancient testament.

By the way, regarding your critic of the Pharisaic judaism, the ancient testament has clear prophecies that mentions the people of Israel at the end of History (for example, that they will return to they land, the nations of the world will turn against them). Even if you don’t like Pharisaic Judaism, there is no other heir of the ancient jewish faith and people who is realizing these prophecies so, by “people/sons of Israel” the text meant the current jews in these prophecies.

Again, this second argument is intended for Christians like I assume you are, not for seculars who have plenty of arguments against the scriptures.

A Quotation from “The Israeli Origin of 9/11 and the War on Terror” (The Israeli war on
Terror): “The war of Terror is basically an Israeli stratagem developed in the 1970s to de-
ceive the American public into thinking that Israel’s enemies are America’s enemies.”

capital letters shouting. Your call, sorry! Hmm
PROsemitic ——- what is it?
If there is an “antisemitism” you must ask: “What is PROsemitism?”
PROsemitism must be a supporter of “semitism”, which really means Judaism (though most Moslems are SEMITIC and most JEWS are NOT). So what are you supporting if you are a PROsemite? Well first of all we must define Judaism:
Judaism is neither a race or a religion, it is Xenophobic Tribalism.
XENOPHOBIC: n.
A person unduly fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or foreign peoples.
TRIBALISM: n.
1. The organization, culture, or beliefs of a tribe.
2. A strong feeling of identity with and loyalty to one’s tribe or group.
So right off the get-go you hate all NON-Jews, NON-members of YOUR group(TRIBE).
You “bundle together” for support and safety, the very definition of Fascism
THAT means, that if I am not one of the TRIBE, you do not like me.
Since Jews BRAND all NON-Jews “gentile” automatically denigrating them, to be PROsemitic one must by definition be ANTI-GENTILE.
They hate all NON-Jews so fundamentally, that they have to SPECIFICALLY name “RIGHTEOUS GENTILES”.
Those are NON-Jewish HUMANS that went so far out of their way to help/save Jews that the Jews were FORCED to ACKNOWLEDGE the humanity of that specific ‘gentile”. You see, PROsemites do not acknowledge the EQUALITY of spirituality and humanity of “gentiles”
What the Jewish Rabbis think of JESUS “As for Christianity, there is a dispute among Halachic authorities, but the vast majority consider it idolatry as well. Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.” Read that last bit again VERY SLOWLY so the “christianzionists” can follow: “ISLAM, on the other hand, is NOT considered idolatry.” ………..

According to the SPLC & ADL an organization is a “HATE GROUP” if it has
“beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people”.
Jews have HATED Egypt for 3,500 years.
Jews have HATED Babylon for 2,500 years.
Jews have HATED CHRIST and his followers for 2,000 years.

David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel, described Zionist aims in 1948: “A Christian state should be established [in Lebanon], with its southern border on the Litani river. We will make an alliance with it. When we smash the Arab Legion’s strength and bomb Amman, we will eliminate Transjordan too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo… And in this fashion, we will end the war and settle our forefathers’ account with Egypt, Assyria, and Aram “………….. read that again
“and settle our forefathers’ account with Egypt, Assyria, and Aram”
They are STILL HATING and planning deadly attacks after 3,500+ YEARS .
How do you think they feel about JESUS CHRIST whom they HATE most of ALL.
Israel’s MOTTOES:
(1) NEVER forgive & NEVER forget.
(2) By Way of Deception you will Do War.
Their ONLY(monotheistic) “god” is a WAR god
PROsemitism is ANTI-HUMANism

“…the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel. ” Bernard Lazare (1894)

The real reason for global ant-Semitism is economic predation. I live in America where no one really cares a great deal about the religious beliefs of others. They mostly judge people on their behavior. People who engage in behavior which results in the exploitation of people financially are always resented and often hated. All the other reason mentioned have merit, but none more than that of economic predation.

Sitemap

Saker Android App

An Android App has been developed by one of our supporters. It is available for download and install by clicking on the Google Play Store Badge above.

All the original content published on this blog is licensed by Saker Analytics, LLC under the Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 4.0 International license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0). For permission to re-publish or otherwise use non-original or non-licensed content, please consult the respective source of the content.