The crumbs from the master's table, in other words less than 50 percent
of the West Bank or a viable state based on a return to the 67 line with
land swaps and, East Jerusalem as its capital. If it is the latter you
want, than we might achieve a 2-state solution. If it is the former,
who knows what will happen and what will be ignited when the talks
collapse and - as is highly likely - most of the world blames Israel.

They had that opportunity in 1967, and blew it. They could've had a
state at any point they wanted. Rather, they wanted our state. Now, they
get nothing. Who says they have the first clue HOW TO run a state. Their
enterprise is built on fiction. From 1948-1967, when Jordan ran the
show, don't you think their state was there for the asking. Why didn't
they want their state while Jordan ran the show? Do you see in this day,
how they act and vilify Israel, with lies and disgusting references. No,
Liz, No State. Let them do whatever they please, let them go to Jordan.
They had countless chances for a state, instead, they killed thousands
of innocent civilians. Millions of people just in the past century have
relocated from their areas, how about we try to incentivize the
Palestinians to relocate, and have a better life. Clearly, they cannot
and will not live with the Jewish people in peace. Israel has given,
given and given, without an iota of reciprocity. They act as if we
"owe" them something, in reality, we owe them zero.

Actions speak louder than all Netanyahu's rhetoric. Expanionism has
grown by 124%. Ma'ale Adumim is a city that splits Palestine into two
and separates East Jerusalem from the rest of Palestine. You hsave a
majority in the Knesset that believes secular democracy is a gentile
sickness that weakens the Jewish character of the state. So, on we go
into building a more and more internationally isolated ghetto and
Zionism will have proven to be an interesting 19th century experiment
but like most colonial movements one which contained the seed of its own demise.

Palestinians don't accept any Israel that leaves it with a Jewish
majority. So, idiots think that having rejected a genuine 2 state
solution Palestinians will now be offered a one state solution in which
they are the majority. The option for the Palestinians is Jewish and
Palestinian states or the status quo. Most Jews are not idiots and they
won't agree to anything else no matter what anyone says.

Palestinians Moving Forward Wisely Give the Palestinians a fair state
now. Kosovo, East Timore, Montenigro, South Sudanese have all become
independent, and with far less international recognition, and gained
independence before the Palestinians, something went seriously wrong.
Zionist occupation looks unique in the World history.

Palestinians want a state in return for nothing so that they can move up
alongside Israel and start attacking Israel from there. The Liberal
Jewish fools around the world encourage Palestinians to believe they can
actually get this. Mainstream Israel will not allow it. Either
Palestinians negotiate an acceptable 2 state solution or they can expect nothing.

What Palestinians will get are more settlers and Israel will neither
annex the territory nor give them citizenship. They can choose between
that and a 2 state solution that is acceptable not only to themselves
but to Israel too.

I like giving Florida to Cuba and Texas to Mexico. Mighty nice of you to
give up the multiple choice. Took us all of two seconds to respond.
Nope. In fact, we can ignore foolish people who are truly clueless in
issues of Israel. Why don't you concoct a multiple choice for Syria and
Russia. I do agree with your once state solution, the state for Israel
and the Jewish people. The Palestinians have dozens of Islamic states,
none of which will put up with them.

But, Mexico is welcome to Arizona. I also agree with the one state.
That's good, because that's exactly what both sides are going to get.
BTW-- The Spanish speakers have most of the Western Hemisphere. Should
we take some of it away from them? And, do you have a point? Israel HAS
a state. She wants the region. No. Just no.

What will you do than, Brad. It's the end of the road for you and a
whole host of your colleagues. Where will you immigrate to soak brains
up in ideas that dispossessing someone for living 500 meters East of
what you approve punishable by dispossession.

Coddling Isareli right-wingers won't get Kerry anywhere, a backbone will
If Kerry voted with Israel 100% despite the growth of settlements over
the years, then he is responsible for the grave situation and should be
the one to remove the settlers from the occupied territories. Settlers
would not even be there were it not for the lax US attitude towards
them. Uncritical support for Israel got us in this mess, and so those
responsible should make sure Israel withdraws from the occupied
territories pronto. Abbas should stop these concessions. Palestinians
have already conceded on Israel proper, Zero concession on the West Bank
which includes E. Jerusalem.

Or we can close the checkbook and see how Bibi manages to pass a budget
without our 3 billion dollars, If he is having serious problems with
taking care of social needs now, wait until it has to balance a budget
without that money.

actually $12,000,000,000 to $15,000,000,000. So.. where'a it all going?
Israel would not last a month without it. UNLESS, she chose to live on
the assets of well-funded zionist orgs. She might be able to get by on
those funds.

Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, and analysis from Israel and the Middle East.
Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict,
the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip,
the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.