Humm, that got ugly fast, looks like it's settled now at least. Do agree with THBK that the shine shouldn't be taken off anyones achievements here in the feds, it's just not a respectful thing to do. That said, people can and should share their opinions in an appropriate and well mannered way. HWA vs Clique was voted the feud of the year, and rightly so in my opinion, it was fantastic.

Humm, that got ugly fast, looks like it's settled now at least. Do agree with THBK that the shine shouldn't be taken off anyones achievements here in the feds, it's just not a respectful thing to do. That said, people can and should share their opinions in an appropriate and well mannered way. HWA vs Clique was voted the feud of the year, and rightly so in my opinion, it was fantastic.

That's another thing I don't like on this forum, particularly n the feds section. When things get blown out of proportion.
Things hardly got ugly here. We just had 2 sides voicing an opinion on a topic, which is exactly what a discussion board is for.

Let me use an example (only those who take an interest in UK politics will get this, but you'll get the gist I'm sure):
It's like when they have a debate in the House of Commons. If you watch it, it often seems to get 'ugly', but in reality, all it is is 2 sides voicing an opinion, which is FAR from things 'getting ugly'. I hate, HATE it when simple discussions where different opinions clash on EWN gets painted as 2 people or 2 sides arguing or having a 'fight' over something.
This is a forum people, if you're going to look at any discussion where 2 different opinions clash and take it as 'things getting ugly' or people 'fighting', or people 'not getting along' or whatever, then stick to the non topical tea spot section of the forum. 32