U.S. Department of Labor Announces New “PAID” Program for Settling FLSA Claims

Thursday, March 8, 2018

On March 6, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (“WHD”) announced a new pilot program through which employers may settle potential overtime and minimum wage claims under the FLSA by paying back pay owed to the affected employee(s), but without paying civil penalties or liquidated damages. The Payroll Audit Independent Determination (PAID) program will be available for six months, after which the Department will evaluate the viability of the program. This program is purely voluntary, both for employers, in that they would need to self-disclose the violation(s) to the WHD, and employees, who may choose to accept the back pay being offered by the employer as full settlement of the potential claim, or decline the offer and file suit, thus preserving the right to recover liquidated damages if successful. If the employee chooses to accept the back pay, and thus settle the potential claim by signing a release of that claim, the WHD will only approve a release if it is tailored to the identified violations and the time period covered by the back wages payment. Employers are not eligible for the program if they are already under investigation by the WHD, involved in litigation or arbitration regarding the particular claim, or the employee has already communicated an interest in litigating or settling the issue. Claims that could be resolved through this program include misclassification of employees as exempt from overtime or failure to pay for “off the clock” work.

In announcing the PAID program, the Wage and Hour Division provided some general guidance as to how the program will work and what steps need to be taken in order for eligible employers to participate. The first step in that process is for the employer to conduct an internal audit to determine which employees are affected by the violation, the time frame at issue, and how much back pay would be owed to the affected employee(s). The employer would then submit those calculations to the WHD, with supporting documentation and a concise explanation of the scope of the potential violations. The employer must also certify that it has reviewed the WHD’s compliance assistance materials; that it is not presently litigating the particular violation; that it has not been contacted by the employee or his/her counsel expressing an interest in litigating or settling the same issue; and that the employer will adjust its practices to avoid future violations. At that point, the WHD will evaluate the back pay calculations and prepare release agreements, which, as noted above, an employee can refuse to accept. Assuming the employee accepts the payment, the employer must pay the agreed upon amount to the employee within the time frame set by the WHD.

The announcement of this new program has left employers with a lot of questions about what effect the program will have on potential state law claims and whether self-disclosing violations could be worse than the risk of making necessary corrections themselves and then waiting as the statute of limitations runs. Indeed, if an employer self-discloses a violation affecting a group of employees – e.g., a potential misclassification under the FLSA’s overtime rules – and the employee chooses not to accept the back pay being offered by the employer, this same employee could find an attorney who would jump at the chance to bring a collective action under the FLSA, which, if successful, allows for the recovery of attorney’s fees. And even if the employee accepts the payment for that particular violation, the WHD may find other violations by the employer or put this employer on its radar for future audits. Accordingly, the risks of participation are not inconsequential, but the reward – clearing up potential liability – may be worth it for some employers. As with so many things, this business decision is best made after consulting with good legal counsel. Stay tuned as more details become available about the PAID program.

Kelly A. Petrocelli has more than 10 years of experience assisting mid-market to Fortune 500 companies to manage and resolve employment disputes, including those involving compliance with the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), Fair Labor and Standards Act (FLSA), Title VII, and similar state employment laws. Serving as lead and co-counsel, she appears regularly before state and federal courts in Illinois and Michigan, as well as administrative agencies including the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,...

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558 Telephone (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.