San Francisco Dangerous Premises Injury Lawyers

Pedestrians Are at Risk for Many Potential Hazards

Property owners must maintain property conditions that are reasonably safe
for the public. This means that any owner of property, including an individual,
a business, or a municipal entity, must uphold its duty to the public.
If the property owner is negligent in maintaining the property and that
negligence results in an injury or accident, an injured victim can seek
compensation for the damages that they have suffered. If you were injured
because of negligent property maintenance, our San Francisco premises
liability lawyers can represent you through your pursuit for financial
compensation.

Accidents Caused by Property Defects

The city of San Francisco is known for its beautiful architecture and historical
buildings. To ensure the safety of the public, the city imposes specific
building codes with which property owners must comply. When a negligent
property owner fails to comply with the safety regulations, hazards can
pose serious risks for unsuspecting passersby and
pedestrians.

Cracked walkways or unmaintained lanes designated for pedestrians and cyclists

Call The Matiasic Firm Today!

If your accident was caused by a dangerous condition, we can help you hold
property owners, municipalities, or other parties responsible for the
damages. We are skilled at determining who has the primary responsibility
for addressing defective property conditions.

In some cases, we are able to establish that multiple parties can be held
liable for your injuries. This has helped our past clients maximize the
amount of compensation they can obtain after an accident. Our unique ability
to achieve noteworthy settlements has earned one of our lead attorneys
inclusion in the
Super Lawyers® listing of Rising Stars℠.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only.
Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual
case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt
or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.