It DESENSITIZES that area ... it's like wearing a condom during sex , which also desensitizes .

This is not rocket science ... All our sensations come through nerve endings , which are under a layer of skin .. the thinner the skin the more sensitive that area is.

The thickness of skin is dependent on how much rubbing , scuffing it has. If you dig your garden for a few days the skin on your hand gets thicker ... Walk with no shoes for a week the skin on the soles of your feet gets thicker , the feet become insensitive , you can soon walk on broken glass!

And if you have your fore skin removed , the sensitive end of your dick scuffs and rubs around in your underpants all day and the layer of skin gets thicker and that area becomes less sensitive !

You become an insensitive lover! and the love bond with your partner never really forms .... It destroys love

Of course ALL the Illuminati are circumcised (it helps to screw them up and make them evil) 90% of the Illuminati are jewish ...
But even the supposedly non jewish aristocracy and royalty are circumcised ... By a Rabbi !!!

"It is one of the oddities of the Royal family -- shared by the majority of the English upper classes -- that for many generations they have circumcised their male sons, invariably using a Mohel (Rabbi) , the Jewish word for a circumcision practitioner. It was rarely done on medical grounds, nor on religious ones, but was a matter of class...."https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...al-Family.html

Prince charles and the man with the blade ... lack of anesthetic of any kind maximized the trauma and helped make charles into the shape shifting rep hybrid he is today

"The World Health Organisation back in 2007 estimated that around 30 per cent of males aged 15 and over are circumcised around the world, with almost 70 per cent of these being Muslim..."

Yes the main practitioners of this are Muslims ... A culture renown for it's troubled male/female interactions ... dominating males , treating women in a barbaric fashion ...
That's what happens as a natural consequence of this practice.

A child doesn't form memories as we understand them until something like 18 months old, if i remember rightly

prior to that they build a memory that is more of an impression. Its an impression of whether or not reality is going to fulfill their needs or not

If a child is well cared for they develop the impression that the world is a positive place in which they can gain what they need and this is more likely then to lead to the person having a positive outlook which in turn can affect how they interact with the world as they grow up

if a child is neglected they build an impression of the world as a hostile place that won't meet their needs and they may become morose and more depressive

If you start sticking vaccine needles into babies and chopping off parts of their body then you are contributing to an impression of the world as a place of pain, trauma and danger. this is likely to lead to a more insular and aggressive and paranoid outlook

Also if you alter a person by putting things inside them or chopping bits off their body you are robbing them of their own free will choice of what they want to do to their body. You are stealing from them a fundamental human right and declaring that you have no regard for the sovereignty of their body

If you are against female genital mutilation then under the same principles you MUST be against male genital mutilation.

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

All sexual stuff should be consensual.(that means done by persons, over an age where people are seen to understand what consent means.) This normally in most 1st world countries is 16 or 17. Rightly so.

Biting of a foreskin of a baby boys penis, and sucking blood from it, and passing stds to that baby boy, is not consensual.

Shows you judaism, is a darkside religion.

If people want to remove there baby boys foreskin, like germany says, it should be done by a doctor. Not by a sexual deviant called a rabbi, whom likes biting of baby boys foreskins and sucking blood from it.

Disgusting.

Imagine some tool back long ago, thought in some state, that god must of told him, that its ok to bite of babies foreskin.

The only person whom benefits from circumcision, done the old way, is the rabbi, whom is a deviant.

__________________
"You put 10 tonnes of proof in front of people, if they are not ready to accept an idea, they will not accept the proof. No amount of evidence will suffice to prove anything, it is the jury that will decide, and you are the jury."
William Cooper - behold a pale horse video
^^
So true

Its the fact this is done when they are still infants and have no choice in the matter. When they turn 18 its up to them if they want to mutilate there bodies.

Yes, poor little babies! The "operation" is so agonising and terrifying- it is wicked abuse of a little human who is helpless. If an adult wants to pay to get this "operation" that is up to him, but to do it to a helpless baby ( where they use no anesthetic) should be illegal!!! The NHS will not carry out this operation as routine as it is rightly considered as unnecessary with no "medical benefits."

It started in 19th century America by that Kellog bloke who said it would stop boys playing with their genitals:

Quote:

In the United States, circumcision wasn't popularized until Victorian times, when a few doctors began to recommend it to prevent children from masturbating. Dr. Kellogg (of Corn Flakes fame) advocated circumcision for pubescent boys and girls to stop masturbation: "A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anæsthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment... In females, the author has found the application of pure carbolic acid to the clitoris an excellent means of allaying the abnormal excitement" (Kellogg 1877). Circumcision caught on among the sex-negative Victorians, but only wealthy parents could afford it. In 1932, only 31% of men were circumcised; this peaked around 85% in 1980, and has been dropping ever since (Laumann 1997, Wallerstein 1980). Far from an ancient tradition, it was only popular in post-war America; think of it as "your parent's body mod."

All sexual stuff should be consensual.(that means done by persons, over an age where people are seen to understand what consent means.) This normally in most 1st world countries is 16 or 17. Rightly so.

Biting of a foreskin of a baby boys penis, and sucking blood from it, and passing stds to that baby boy, is not consensual.

Shows you judaism, is a darkside religion.

If people want to remove there baby boys foreskin, like germany says, it should be done by a doctor. Not by a sexual deviant called a rabbi, whom likes biting of baby boys foreskins and sucking blood from it.

Disgusting.

Imagine some tool back long ago, thought in some state, that god must of told him, that its ok to bite of babies foreskin.

The only person whom benefits from circumcision, done the old way, is the rabbi, whom is a deviant.

It is vile agreed Andy, but not even a doctor should do this to a helpless baby. I'm an atheist but it seems to me a god that created the male body, then commands its followers that they cut off a part of a very sensitive part of the body when newly born is sadistic and crazy. This "religious tradition" makes no sense at all.

__________________Imagination... its limits are only those of the mind itself.

It may be said with a degree of assurance that not everything that meets the eye is as it appears.

Is it like that to make sure dirt and stuff doesnt get in there?? (I mean in your main shaft)

Are you asking why all male mammals evolved to have foreskins?

Quote:

Medical Ignorance

Few doctors really understand what they are doing when they amputate the foreskin, for they have never studied how the penis develops before birth.1

Foreskin growth and Development

The penis begins its development as a microscopic protuberance in the male fetus 6 weeks after conception. As it grows outward, a thick layer of epithelial cells, which will become skin, piles up at the base in folds during the next two weeks. At this stage, the tube within the shaft, the urethra, has developed only part of the way down the shaft.

Then, at the 10 week horizon, the glans, seen head on, begins to develop two downward growing folds of tissue, like the twin hulls of a catamaran. By the 15th week these fold have fused at the bottom creating a tube within the glans. Now the urethra is extended to the tip. If this step fails to take place, a condition known as hypospadias, where the urethra opens short of the tip, will be present at birth.

With further growth of the shaft and of the glans penis, the skin comes forward to completely cover it by the 15th week.

>From the 15th week on, the skin covers the glans completely, with a small opening at the tip. A distinct layer of cells attaches the skin most firmly to the entire surface of the glans. This skin is the skin of the glans penis. It has not yet separated to create two distinct organs, the glans and the foreskin.

Beginning around the 15th week and continuing gradually for as long as 17 years, a process begins which ultimately separated the foreskin from the glans. This fascinating process begins with the flattening of some cells in the area between the glans and the foreskin. These flattened cells round up into a ball, containing many layers of cells. The central cells are necessarily cut off from nutrients, and dies, forming a space filled with the products of dead cells. Many such whorls of cells form in this area between the glans and the foreskin, and create spaces; these spaces coalesce, and eventually create the preputial space, permitting full retraction of the foreskin from the glans.

The Newborn Condition

At birth, virtually all males have a glans penis covered with skin. In almost all of them (96%), this skin is still attached to the glans like normal skin. Only 4% have a fully retractable foreskin at birth.2

The implications of this finding are enormous. Any doctor or other person who inserts a probe into this space between the foreskin and the glans thinking that he is breaking adhesions is mistaken. Anyone who attempts to forcibly retract the skin is tearing the skin off an extremely sensitive organ. This person is literally skinning the penis alive. The facts of penis development tell us so.

It is not until the 3rd year of life that 90% of young boys have fully retractable foreskins, and it is not until 17 years of age before virtually all boys have fully retractable foreskins.3

The facts of penis development demonstrate to us that an unusual process separates the foreskin from the glans in its own good time, covering the infant glans tightly to protect it from fecal contamination; covering the glans to protect it when, while its owner is a child, it is not required for procreation; and finally, freeing up the cover when it is needed for reproduction. There is no reason to interfere with this natural process.

What is another important function of the foreskin? To answer that, it is first necessary to look at the function of another organ, namely the penis. The penis has two obvious main functions. It is used for urination and for procreation. But the penis is not required for urination. Witness the female of the species. She does not have a penis, and yet she is perfectly capable of urination. The penis may be a convenient organ for urination, but it is certainly not required.

Functions of the Foreskin

We can then say that the major function of the penis is procreation, that is, the perpetuation of the species. Without the penis, there would be no more humans.

The penis cannot procreate in the relaxed or flaccid state. It must erect, engorging with blood, to perform its major function. With this change in condition, from being relaxed to being erect, comes an increase in length of approximately 50%. Now where does this enlarged erect penis obtain skin to cover its significantly elongated shaft? >From the foreskin.

In the relaxed state, the tip of the penis of the intact adult male is covered by the foreskin, which consists of a fold of skin overlying a complex mucous membrane. As the shaft of the penis elongates with erection, this double layer becomes a single layer which covers the longer shaft.

In spite of these self-evident functions, some people have tried to argue that the foreskin does not have a function. When I was a medical student, several decades ago, it was thought that the appendix was the one organ without a function. I was taught that the appendix was a vestigial organ, left over from the remote past. We now know that this is not true. The appendix functions as part of the immune system, producing large numbers of lymphocytes. Since the known parts of the body have a function, the probability of the foreskin no having one is virtually nil.

The foreskin covers the elongated shaft of the penis during erection; at other times it protects the sensitive glans penis. The foreskin contains many minute muscle fibers which give it tone. It covers the glans snugly, and helps to prevent the glans from developing a thick, many layered epidermis, which happens in the absence of the foreskin. This thickened epidermis reduces sexual sensitivity.

Since the penis is used for procreation only a few times in the entire life of the individual, sexual pleasure must also be a major function, and the foreskin is an integral part of that pleasure. Many anthropologists believe that sexual pleasure with an available mate contributes to the stability of the pair bond. Surely it is not the aim of ethical doctors to interfere in matters of such vital importance.

It is vile agreed Andy, but not even a doctor should do this to a helpless baby. I'm an atheist but it seems to me a god that created the male body, then commands its followers that they cut off a part of a very sensitive part of the body when newly born is sadistic and crazy. This "religious tradition" makes no sense at all.

well it makes you wonder which 'god' told them to do that...

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act