FZ200 Vs whatever

Since the Antarctica trip, I've found myself looking at the Canon SX50HS for its extra reach. It would supplement rather than replace the FZ200. On that trip I had the FZ200, and the Canon S95 and G15. The S95 was in my pants pocket all the time on shipboard; the FZ200 took all the nature and Antarctic landscape shots; and the G15 was hardly used.

In the process of considering that, I've gone back and looked at a bunch of reviews on the FZ200 and SX50HS, as well as a comparison in CameraLabs of the Sony RX10, Olympus Stylus 1, and the FZ200. I found that very interesting, as the FZ200 outpointed the Stylus 1 at ISO 200 and 400. The RX10 was better; but too pricey and too big and heavy.

The SX50HS holds up very well against the FZ200; but at the expense of a much slower lens. So the SX50HS would be a wildlife shooter in good light.

I also have the Canon S95, G15, A720IS, & SX230HS, so there's also the question of how all this stuff fits together on travel. For travel, I can't take it all, and have to decide, based on what I expect to need, which two or three cameras will best fit my needs on that trip.