In February 2011, police in Canberra raided a major multicultural festival and closed down a stall that was serving kava to reportedly hundreds of visitors.Police were acting on orders from the Chief Minister banning kava from the Australian Capital Territory.

How did it come about that kava – a highly ritualised and essential part of ceremonies for welcoming, respect, farewell and peace-making in many Pacific cultures – could be banned?

Chequered history

Kava has long been used in Pacific cultures to relieve anxiety and stress. Its properties were recognised by German scientists as early as 1860 and kava-based medicines became popular in Europe from 1890 to the late 1990s.

In Australia, two Fijian missionaries introduced kava to certain Aboriginal groups in the Northern Territory in the early 1980s as a substitute for alcohol. At first it was successful and alcohol sales to some communities plummeted, but by the mid-1980s medical reports emerged suggesting liver damage in some individuals.

In 2001, the German government announced it too had received reports of liver damage (and one death) possibly related to the intake of kava extract or tablets. In both Australia and Europe, a media outcry was followed by restrictions on the availability of kava. Germany and France both banned sales of the very popular kava extract and tablets in 2002. Australia declared kava a ‘prescription only’ medicine in 2004 and banned its commercial importation in 2007.

Puzzle

Pacific kava drinkers were puzzled and angered. There is no history of liver damage from kava in Oceania despite centuries of kava-drinking, suggesting that any problems were from the modern tablet extraction or production processes, or its abuse with alcohol.

In fact, the medical basis for banning kava has always been sketchy and controversial. A recent review of the evidence published in the journal Drug and Alcohol Review has found no association between kava and cognitive impairment, liver toxicity or permanent liver damage.

Response

Pacific communities have now formed the Australian Kava Movement. The group held an international conference at ANU in August and submitted a report to the federal government in September calling for a review of the restrictions on kava.

Should natural kava be allowed once again to be widely enjoyed in multicultural Australia as a relaxing, natural social drink? Or should Australian governments continue to legislate against kava, acts that many Pacific islanders consider to be discriminatory?

1 comment

The difficulty we have with our brothers and sisters of one of the seven sisters of Eve is that they try to experiment things too much to the point where they mix kava with fermented drink: this is surely far too much for human liver to cope resulting in the collapse of the liver.
We have the ceremonial kava drink in the Pacific and it has stood the times of no liver collapse. Are we much tougher than the other descendants of the seven sisters of Eve? No. We are not. We do not have the use of alcohol culture. So keep them in distance.
Kava ceremonial drink is associated not only with according high ranking on an individual visitor regardless of colour, race or religion but we also allow them a place within our inclusive culture of Pacific communities. It must never be mixed up with the Pub Culture of Europe.
I do hope that Australia, which is a multicultural society, can allow ceremonial kava drink of the Pacific Island Communities practised.
Mali Voi, OBE
Former head of UNESCO (Pacific Office, Apia)