Abstract

A computerised version of the Silly Sentences task developed for use with children
(Baddeley et al, 1995) is found to be equivalent to the pencil-and-paper version from the
SCOLP Test (Baddeley et al, 1992) with UK undergraduates, and is usable by a sample of
young UK children. Because the sentences are presented aloud instead of being written, the
computerised test is not affected by literacy skills. Translated into Kiswahili, the task was
used in Tanzanian schools, despite the absence of an electricity supply and a very different
cultural background. The decision latencies had a test-retest reliability of 0.69 over 5
months, and were independent of age and baseline decision speed. The task appears
appropriate for longitudinal studies, including those in developing countries. Given its
simplicity and the correlations with the original SCOLP version of the task, it may also
be useful in studies on literate adults.