Nils wrote: But then Rick writes "Why would you assume that people aren't qualified to determine right from wrong?" I agree with Rick. Even if there is no authority we can refer to we all have an intuition of what is right and wrong. FYI Nils, I wasn't saying that there is no authority. R...

If you understood, you wouldn't have said what you said. In your opinion, is it possible to disagree with you on this issue and still understand? Ken Is it possible that you are conflating ontology and epistemology? No. Then could you explain the difference between ontology and epistemology, as the...

All kids like toys and I have decided to give some unique toys to my kids on this new year :) I bought some soft toys for them but one of my kids told me he wants an electronic car, So could anyone of you please suggest me from where I can buy and which type of electronic car should I buy?? I don't...

Before we continue, with all of your post, can we address this first? You said: Kenny wrote: Okay; lets assume morality is objective, and people aren’t qualified to determine right from wrong (morality), thus we need something else superior to us to determine such complicated issues; like God. Why ...

Before we continue, with all of your post, can we address this first? You said: Kenny wrote: Okay; lets assume morality is objective, and people aren’t qualified to determine right from wrong (morality), thus we need something else superior to us to determine such complicated issues; like God. Why ...

Even if there is no authority we can refer to we all have an intuition of what is right and wrong. In most cases my feelings about right and wrong can be related to my intellectual understanding of what is best to me, to my family, and to the society. No further reference to a God is needed. Your i...

Before we continue, with all of your post, can we address this first? You said: Kenny wrote: Okay; lets assume morality is objective, and people aren’t qualified to determine right from wrong (morality), thus we need something else superior to us to determine such complicated issues; like God. Why ...

Before we continue, with all of your post, can we address this first? You said: Kenny wrote: Okay; lets assume morality is objective, and people aren’t qualified to determine right from wrong (morality), thus we need something else superior to us to determine such complicated issues; like God. Why w...

https://www.livescience.com/13002-7-absolutely-evil-medical-experiments-tuskegee-syphilis.html Evil is so subjective. And Pathos, without Logos, is intellectually dishonest. I don't think you'd like me to list the evils done by all cultures, in the name of Theism or Deism? But you are correct evil ...

Very few people have the balls to take subjective morality to it's natural conclusion and those that do are, typically, viewed as psychopaths or sociopaths. But they are at least honest. What about the problem of taking Objective morality to it's natural conclusion? Ken Which conclusion is that Ken...

Rick: Ed, The question I would have as a followup to your article, is it possible for Rockefeller to be for a one world govt, while being pro boarders? I don't get it, what do pro boarders have to do with global government? http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QimRnl8k37E/VTbUbO-VrrI/AAAAAAADVkU/bLLwiwTx_Pw/s...