Now run along and go play with santa, the easter bunny, the tooth fairy, and the herd of unicorns they all raise together as one happy family.

I, along with several other people, directly refuted your evidence.

No. You gave up and didn't realize that meant you lost, then wanted to come back to prove it and I wouldn't let you. You can't possibly refute something you give up and refuse to address.

And you have to be delusional to believe you won a debate arguing on the side of a young earth.

It isn't difficult to win any debate when your opponent gives up.

I'm sure you wish you would have directly addressed the evidence the first time instead of playing games and trying to twist what I said. If you had done that, you might have gotten the debate you beg for now. Instead, because you refused to deal with the real post and wanted to play games and twist things, you lost any chance you had to have a real debate on the matter.

Now you have two choices: You can let that be a lesson learned and actually grow from this experience, or you can continue in your ignorance. I know you'll probably go for the latter as it is entirely your style in these situations, but for your sake I hope you may reconsider and actually learn from this.

Learning from this would mean that the next time you debate someone, you don't play games - you actually read what they have to say and respond to it.

Why does bis go a few days without posting, then return for more abuse?

Mommy revoked computer privileges.It's hard to type while wearing a straight jacket.He spent the weekend entertaining imaginary friends.He had an important conference with Institute for Creation Research "scientists' in a booth at Denny's.It takes a few day to soothe his spirit and talk himself into believing he's not the one getting slapped around in this thread.He ran out of tin foil. Can't get on the computer without tin foil hat. Not safe. Gub'mint gonna steal his brain waves.Spent the weekend shooting a video of a lefty 2B trying to turn a double play.

I'm just having fun pointing out bad_luck's failing to win the debate (he gave up), and failing to get what he wants (another debate with me).

I can stop any time I want, and I have done for several days on multiple occasions already, including one which I used to successfully prove bad_luck wants attention and is, in fact, the only one here who simply must have the last word.

Now run along and go play with santa, the easter bunny, the tooth fairy, and the herd of unicorns they all raise together as one happy family.

I, along with several other people, directly refuted your evidence.

No. You gave up and didn't realize that meant you lost, then wanted to come back to prove it and I wouldn't let you. You can't possibly refute something you give up and refuse to address.

And you have to be delusional to believe you won a debate arguing on the side of a young earth.

It isn't difficult to win any debate when your opponent gives up.

I'm sure you wish you would have directly addressed the evidence the first time instead of playing games and trying to twist what I said. If you had done that, you might have gotten the debate you beg for now. Instead, because you refused to deal with the real post and wanted to play games and twist things, you lost any chance you had to have a real debate on the matter.

Now you have two choices: You can let that be a lesson learned and actually grow from this experience, or you can continue in your ignorance. I know you'll probably go for the latter as it is entirely your style in these situations, but for your sake I hope you may reconsider and actually learn from this.

Learning from this would mean that the next time you debate someone, you don't play games - you actually read what they have to say and respond to it.

If you don't want the debate to continue, you are free to stop responding. But as long as you do, the debate continues.

RECAP:
Bis argued that a young earth was equally as likely as an old earth. When asked for evidence he provided it here (I had to link to dahs' post, bis has deleted the original "evidence" post, luckily dahs quoted it) on December 24th.

On December 27th I directly responded to bis' "evidence." Here's that. I provided bis' "evidence" in block quotes above each response.

Bis never responded directly to that.

So I wait. He claims he can bury me with his research. He just doesn't want to...because...he doesn't like arguing or typing or something. I don't know.

If you don't want the debate to continue, you are free to stop responding. But as long as you do, the debate continues.

The debate hasn't existed at all for weeks, so it can't possibly continue. There is no debate going on except in your delusional mind.

So while you keep thinking a debate is going to happen, back in the real world, I just keep pointing out your failures in this thread.

You gave up on the debate and lost - massive fail for you.

You tried to get me to debate again and failed to do that.

You failed to convince me (or any thinking person on here) that you and genghisxcon aren't the same individual.

I conclusively proved you have to have the last word and are basically an attention seeking child.

I can point out your failures until I get bored if you'd like. If you don't want me to keep pointing those things out, you are free to stop responding. But as long as you do, I'll have fun pointing out those failures until I'm bored with it.

I'm just having fun pointing out bad_luck's failing to win the debate (he gave up), and failing to get what he wants (another debate with me).

I can stop any time I want, and I have done for several days on multiple occasions already, including one which I used to successfully prove bad_luck wants attention and is, in fact, the only one here who simply must have the last word.

"I can stop any time I want"

Yet you do not, which can only lead us to believe that:

1) You cannot stop, because you obsessively crave the attention that you keep bringing to yourself by returning and posting

2) You CAN stop anytime you want, but you choose not to because you crave the attention that you keep bringing to yourself by returning and posting.

Either way you cut it, you're an attention-whoring troll. The only question is whether it's because of a psychological disorder or by choice.