If you've ever spent any time in or around the military, you know that ammo dumps are placed far away from humans, for the VERY REASON that an accident could happen, or a stray round could go in there, and they could blow sky-high .... which is exactly what did happen.<br><br>When they decide where to put an ammo dump, they take into account that this sort of accident could happen.<br><br>You can bet a few guards got obliterated, but it's doubtful anybody else did.<br><br>But I do know, also from experience, that the military will lie about HOW people are killed. If they are killed in any kind of top-secret or embarrassing circumstances, the military will simply change the "facts" about how they were killed. They've been doing it forever and will continue to do so. <p></p><i></i>

what I was just saying:<br><br>This from DemocraticUnderground.com:<br><br>AZDemDist6 (1000+ posts) &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Mon Oct-23-06 10:11 PM<br>Response to Original message<br>104. my DH worked in high security guarding big MOABs and other high<br>explosives during most of his tour in the Army. I had him watch this video and he says it's highly unlikely it was a nuke. First of all, nukes don't go off from blasts around them, they have to be carefully exploded. he says that looks like a 2000 lb bomb going off. <br>he also said the chance of no casualties is also pretty high. the Army constructs their ammo dumps especially to minimize any outward explosion of the ordinances. He said SOP is to dig a big hole and surround it with 10 foot (usually) earthen berms so all the explosives go UP and not OUT. He also said they wouldn't be anywhere near where the guys live for that very reason (to minimize injuries and damage)<br>While I don't doubt the Administration put the brakes on the news orgs showing the tapes, my DH says the tape would look like all hell was breaking loose while on the ground it is loud and scary as hell but he says it looks like the dump exploded just like it was supposed to as all the explosives went UP<br>He knows this from personal experience when his base's dump went up to the tune of 126K pounds of explosives including Daisy Cutters. It shredded double thick steel doors. He said a couple guys got hit with some shrapnel but nobody died and most injuries were minimal.<br>I figured since I am sitting next to someone who has actually witnessed such an event, I'd share what he had to say.<br>We both are interested to see what Sy comes up with though.<br><br>Link:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2460228&mesg_id=2464506">www.democraticunderground...id=2464506</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

WHO* REALLY IS TO BE BLAMED FOR THE CAMP FALCON EXPLOSION?<br><br> Monday, 23 October 2006<br><br>In Response To: AMMO DUMP EXPLODES <br><br> I am starting to have doubts about whether it was really the Iraqi "resistance" that blew up Camp Falcon's ammunition depot South of Baghdad on Tuesday, Oct.10 - as it was announced proudly - allegedly by the "resistance" itself...<br><br> So, who is this "resistance" in Iraq really? Read on and wonder together with me!<br><br> You can read the following at Jihad Unspun: (Emphasis added) <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=94840">www.rumormillnews.com/cgi...read=94840</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br> One interesting aspect of the video that Jihad Unspun showed. They show a satellite of Camp falcon and zooming in on detail. Now try any online satellite system (Google Earth) go to Iraq and you will find that yes it is blocked and not available to us. So by inference the resistance has their own spy satellite, I think not. This has the fingerprints of the propogandist arm of the Pentagon.<br> <br> Thank you very much. As I wrote, I refused to login on that "JUS"-site. Thank you for your find. Indeed, telling... <p></p><i></i>

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=94818">www.rumormillnews.com/cgi...read=94818</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Question although remains why the U.S.Govt. leaves the troops on ground with an obvious lacking support, low number of ground forces and insufficient material, as old body armour.<br><br>Seems to be clear by now that the "Neoconnonists" didn't want to "win the war", "democratizising Iraq" or anything similarly at all. In a desasterous "pas des deux" with Israel those both Administrations are sacrifizing their own citizens - for the goals of the NWO, the "bad" Globalists.<br><br>In the case of Israel the EU-troops had to be drawn into the theatre - possibly merely for the sake of desperately verifying weird prophecies of 'coming' Armageddons. Same in Iraq, where a similar goal has to be reached as experienced in Afghanistan already, where NATO has taken over the mess - deliberately created by the U.S.Admin.. The NWO-masters have to create a scenario where European (aka Christian) troops are being sucked in against Islamic forces directly - giving way to 'error-attacks on European soil - and opening the "Grande Finale" by an orchestrated "clash of civilizations".<br><br>But you've heard my voice on the wall already before...<br><br>Was the WashingtonPost-headline from July even more "farsighted"? -<br><br>'Waiting to Get Blown Up'<br>Some Troops in Baghdad Express Frustration With the War and Their Mission<br><br>The whole American people are being "blown up" right now: By their own Admin and by their "owned" Media...<br><br> War on 'error, Part 1913: "Blown Up Expectations"<br><br>--If this fails to prompt an immediate exit from Iraq, I cannotimagine what it will take.<br><br>This debacle has all the markings of another Mossad 'false flag'operation....<br><br><br>"Exit from Iraq"? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> Possibly - perhaps that's why the huuuuge new U.S.embassy is being built in Baghdad: If there will be an "exit" - the aerea of an embassy is regarded as extraterritorial space - so you can do "magic" - by "leaving Iraq" and at the same time staying in Baghdad - on "U.S. soil".. <p></p><i></i>