Gossip Cop has obtained a strongly worded letter from Rachel Uchitel’s legal team to the New York Post demanding a retraction and apology for publishing comments Uchitel says were taken completely out of context.

As we reported yesterday, Uchitel claims a Post story quoting her on the subject of her fiancé, 9/11 victim James Andrew O’Grady, twisted her words to make it seem as though she were grateful he had died.

Uchitel’s legal team struck back today, alleging that a “crude and malicious juxtaposition of words” represented “abuse” toward her and a “disservice” to O’Grady’s memory.

Rachel Uchitel is furious with comments attributed to her about the death of her fiancé, James Andrew O’Grady, in the September 11 attacks, which she says the New York Post took out of context.

In the controversial Post piece, Uchitel is quoted as saying, “I believe Andy was meant to die because he was too good. I’m almost happy it ended the way it did because I’ve learned so many lessons from him. It would have been tragic if we got into fights and then divorced.”

The Post then has her saying that had O’Grady lived, “I would be a fat housewife with three kids in Sands Point, Long Island.”

Dingman, a super-rich investor/son of a billionaire, was supposedly living with Uchitel in Miami when the Woods scandal broke in 2009, according to TMZ.

In fact, claims the site, onetime Playboy model and Woods infidelity whistleblower Jennifer Lee Madden reportedly used information she overheard at Dingman’s house about the golfer and Uchitel to give the bombshell story to the press.