Good
guys always win? It usually works that way in the movies, especially
if the hero happens to be Clint Eastwood, John Wayne or Harrison Ford.
But in real life? Often in politics there isn't a choice. Sometimes
you are given the selection between Republican candidate Yuck and Democrat
Burp.

Case
in point: November 6, 2008. The sun shone brightly on Washington DC,
but over the Republican National Headquarters, there hung a little gray
cloud of gloom. "What happened?" asked the “insider”
Republican strategists. "We had the issues, the money and all the
paraphernalia necessary for victory. We thought we had a ‘Big
Tent’ winner but it turned out to be a Big Tent Bust!"

The
Republican Washington, DC insiders thought they had a candidate who
had it all. He was considered a war hero, a maverick, a United States
Senator and a household name – one who was constantly on national
TV and in the mainstream news. His mascot was one of the most powerful
of the African animal species and his opponent’s mascot was a
jackass – a rhino against a donkey – how could the Republican
possibly lose?

And
lose he did, big time.

Could
it be that the sizable conservative base of the Republican Party wasn't
pleased with McCain? The “big tent” theory hadn't worked.
Could it be that the poles that held up the big tent were the conservative
activists? Aren't they the volunteer workers, poll watchers, drivers
of elderly to the polls, and precinct walker activists -- namely, the
ones who turn out the vote?

However,
in the primary selection, McCain wasn't their choice. McCain was picked
by the national media and the Washington insiders.

Somewhat
consoled by Sarah Palin's selection as the vice presidential candidate,
some conservatives got off the couch and voted for McCain as an afterthought
– but, they didn't work for him and didn't tell their friends
if they did.

The
Democrat choice was Obama, the most radical Senator of them all. The
Democrat National Convention had previously selected liberal Senators,
such as Humphrey, McGovern, Mondale, Kerry and Gore – and all
had lost by comfortable margins. Why should 2008 be any different?

Obama
ran a slick campaign around the word "Change!" And then he
changed opponents. Obama forgot McCain existed and campaigned against
President Bush. The mainstream media swooned over Obama's every word
as they had swooned over getting McCain nominated in the primary –
then they forgot he was alive. The race was over before it began. In
fact, can anyone even remember what McCain's lackluster campaign even
stood for?

So,
in all good conscience, many conservatives put two and two together
and figured it was like choosing between two political rashes, some
couldn't vote for Obama and had little itch to vote for McCain. So to
sum it up, some voted for McCain, some stayed home, some didn't care
and that's the total sum.

The
fact is, in 2008 the mainstream media had picked both candidates from
the very beginning -- Candidate Yuck and Burp. The left was organized
in the primaries and the conservatives were not. The fact is, you can't
win something with nothing. Good guys have to win primaries before they
can win in the general election. Winning takes organization, determination
and leadership IN THE PRIMARIES. Over the last fifty years, the radical
left has finally taken over the Democrat Party by winning primary races
first. Therefore, the hard left has been able to gain control of the
leadership of both houses of Congress by 2006 and the presidency in
2008. Is it any wonder the next two years got really ugly?

Many
Americans finally got peeved, organized and downright mad. Little did
anyone realize that Americans of both parties had unintentionally voted
for having a giant tea party. Two years later in the 2010 elections,
both political entities found out that the tea that had been brewing
was really hot ... and not about to cool off! Many of the Tea Partiers
were politically green as grass in 2008, but they were smart enough
to know that two plus two equaled four and that organization was a critical
part of the elective equation, so they organized.

So,
now we're looking at the presidential race in 2012. Obama looks vulnerable
and a number of Republican hopefuls have tossed their hat in the ring.
And, the mainstream media is at it again, trying to tell us that another
candidate Yuck is the best of the Republicans to oppose President Burp.
Surprise, surprise, the Washington Republican insiders seem to agree
with the mainstream media. Isn't he the best debater? Wasn't he the
beloved executive governor of Massachusetts? So far we haven't heard
a real negative note from The New York Times or The Washington Post
on this perennial leader in the polls. And, as an afterthought, we’ve
been told that any conservative in the race don't stand a chance.

Subscribe
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter
Your E-Mail Address:

Conservatives
should know by now that the Republican that's been the most viciously
attacked by the media is probably the best Republican candidate: one
that is pro-gun, pro-family, pro-life, pro-Constitution and pro-God.

We
gunners know that if Republican Yuck wins the primary instead of a rock
solid conservative, we'll be hunting in November and the Republican
conservative base will be back on the couch watching football instead
of turning out the vote. The result will be the same as 2008, and America
will be inundated with teleprompter Burp for four more years, that is,
if America can last that long.

Conservatives
should know by now that the Republican that's been the most viciously
attacked by the media is probably the best Republican candidate: one that
is pro-gun, pro-family, pro-life, pro-Constitution and pro-God.