New Study Suggests That Female Fish Get Turned On By Gay Maleshttp://www.businessinsider.com/female-fish-are-attracted-to-gay-males-2012-12/comments
en-usWed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 -0500Sun, 02 Aug 2015 19:01:36 -0400Randy Astaizahttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c89d0eecad040c4600000aRandy AstaizaWed, 12 Dec 2012 10:04:46 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c89d0eecad040c4600000a
It doesn't need any justification in the human case. I was just talking about how it works in the case of these fish. Seems interesting.
At the end of the article I mentioned exclusively gay males are only seen in humans, sheep, and some bird species.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c87e8f69bedda269000002William DeLaneyWed, 12 Dec 2012 07:54:39 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c87e8f69bedda269000002
This reminds me of a song by the Bloodhound Gang....although I am tempted on one hand to agree with artful dodger, I would also point out that this would make bisexuality a very strong trait. As the old (bad) joke says, "they are just greedy." Maybe we ought to think twice before we laugh now!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c819deeab8ea9b0f000009Millie CooperWed, 12 Dec 2012 00:45:02 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c819deeab8ea9b0f000009
You nailed the problem! All the rich and handsome men are already dating each others, leaving nothing to us old-fashioned women!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c80b7869bedd4f59000001Hilmi A.RTue, 11 Dec 2012 23:43:36 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c80b7869bedd4f59000001
This research doesnt really reveal anything lol
And people should've mind their own business and not forced their opinion on other people. There's no real answer to the gay question whether its OK or not, because then it'd be religious/traditionalist vs. LBGTshttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c7d8adecad049051000001artful dodgerTue, 11 Dec 2012 20:06:53 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c7d8adecad049051000001
I have absolutely nothing against gay people but suggesting that simply because it exists means that it may have been evolutionarily advantageous is a stretch. There are plenty of 'negative' traits that have been passed on through the million or so years of human existence. I have absolutely terrible eyesight, for example, and I've been this way since I was a young boy. I can't imagine how terrible eyesight (let alone blindness and deafness) could possibly be construed as a genetic benefit to humanity, yet it's obviously survived over a million years of natural selection. Some traits simply persist; no need to assume they confer any benefits.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c7cb5669bedd9039000001westerneduchineseTue, 11 Dec 2012 19:09:58 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/50c7cb5669bedd9039000001
So do the 'gay' male fish then actually mate with the watching female?
Otherwise this article is nothing but attempting to derive justification for the human case.