Juvenile Delinquency

September 30, 2011

Today marks the last day of business for the Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court at its current facility on East 22nd. The Court is in the process of moving into the new Cuyahoga County Juvenile Justice Center (CCJJC) located at 9300 Quincy Ave. in Cleveland, Ohio. The building will be fully open to the public starting on October 11, 2011, but filings will be accepted at the CCJJC beginning on October 3rd, when the court will also begin to hear emergency custody, detention arraignments, adult jail, and civil protection matters at the new facility. For questions, you can call (216) 443-8400 for more information. Click here for a video tour of the new facility.

October 26, 2009

The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports that Cuyahoga County has approved $29 million in contracts for construction of a new Juvenile Justice Center. Approval had been delayed based on allegations of corruption in the bidding process, but some of the work on the Center has already begun, with the hope of opening in 2011. The PD indicates that the County postponed its vote until receiving a clean bill of health from a former federal prosecutor the County hired to review all of the bid, appraisal and contract documents. Interestingly, the PD column ends by stating that the County changed its bid process in the last few weeks despite the fact that the contracts were also cleared as part of a large federal investigation.

April 03, 2008

The Plain Dealer reports that Cuyahoga County has awarded $40 million in contracts for the construction of a new Juvenile Justice Center on the East side at East 93rd and Quincy Avenue. The project is slated for completion by 2010 and will include space for judges and a juvenile detention center. Although the location was purchased in 2000, the Plain Dealer reports that Juvenile Court Judges did not want to move from their present location until the issue was resolved in late summer 2006. The County's existing juvenile detention center, which has been plagued with issues of over-crowding, is located on Central Avenue in Cleveland.

May 07, 2007

The official text of amendments to Cleveland Codified Ordinance 605.14, which imposes stricter curfews on minors can be viewed in The City Record, May 2, 2007 at page 746, page 34 of the pdf document. The official text of new Cleveland Codified Ordinance Nos. 623.101 and 623.102 which restricts spraypaint sales to minors can also be viewed in The City Record, May 2, 2007 at page 746, page 34 of the pdf document. For more details, see our prior post: Cleveland Passes Stricter Curfews, Bans Spray Paint Sales to Minors.

April 30, 2007

Cleveland City Council voted for stricter curfews for minors. According to a Sun News article,

"Currently, the nightly curfew for children is darkness to dawn for ages 12 years and younger, 11 p.m. to 5 a.m. for children 13 to 16 years old, and midnight to 5 a.m. for 17-year-olds.

The biggest change will be for 13- and 14-year-olds, who will have to remain indoors from 9:30 p.m. to 6 a.m. The curfew is 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. for 15- and 16-year-olds; and midnight to 6 a.m. for 17-year-olds. Police can cite parents and legal guardians with a minor misdemeanor, punishable by a $100 fine."

Curfew Law Could Help Provide Quiet by Ken Prendergast, West Side Sun News, Apr. 26, 2007. There are some exceptions to the law, including when the minor is accompanied by a parent or guardian, when the child is en route from a job or when the parent has initiated juvenile court proceedings against the minor. See City Record, April 25, 2007 at page 685, page 13 of the pdf document. The official text of amended Cleveland Codified Ordinance 605.14 has not yet appeared in the City Record, but will be posted on this blog when it does so appear.

City Council also passed new ordinances 623.101 and 623.103, which prohibit the sale of spray paint to minors. See City Record, April 25, 2007 at page 685, page 13 of the pdf document. The official text of these new Cleveland Codified Ordinances has not yet appeared in the City Record, but will be posted on this blog when they appear.

April 27, 2007

A mother charged under the Maple Heights parental responsibility ordinance, Ordinance No. 648.20, moved to have the ordinance declared unconstitutional. Thelma Ephraim was charged under the ordinance because her son was charged with carrying a concealed weapon, resisting arrest and failure to comply with a police order. In her motion to dismiss the charges against her, Ephraim argued that the law is vague and overbroad. Additionally, she asserts that the law violates her due process rights because it interferes with a parent's right to raise their children and the law fails to pass the strict scrutiny test. She also argues that the ordinance violates due process because it preempted by state laws, specifically ORC 2151.03 pertaining to neglected children and ORC 2919.22 creating the criminal offense of child endangering.

April 15, 2007

The following changes are underway in order to make sure juveniles are detained pending trial if they are at risk of committing crimes:

*The court administrator has asked that an empty cottage at the Youth Development Center in Hudson be opened, to allievate overcrowding in the juvenile detention center.

* Assessments which include more variables are proposed. The current assessment test only considers prior offenses. New tests would consider other factors, and would get input from the alleged victims.

*Administrative Judge Russo told his fellow judges that they must strictly adhere to the rule requiring detained juvenile's cases to be heard in 90 days.

*Prosecutor Bill Mason pledged to call victims to notify them if an accused juvenile has been released.

March 18, 2007

While the Attorney General's e-SORN database states that by law, it can not include juvenile sex offenders, Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann plans to look into whether this information can be included. Butler and Clermont counties decided to wait to hear from the attorney general as to whether they can include juvenile offenders in their sex offender database. Other counties, like Hamilton County, are including juvenile offenders in their on-line sex offender database. Source: OH AG Marc Dann on Juvenile Sex Offenders by Liz Foreman, WCPO.com. See our prior post: Can Sex Offender Databases Contain Info on Juvenile Sex Offenders?

Recently, a juvenile, while on release pending trial for rape, shot his victim. The case spurred prosecutors and court administrators to make changes. A new magistrate will be hired to handle all juvenile arraignments. The criteria for release will be reviewed. Several other changes are proposed. A system should be created to notify the victim of the juvenile's release. Probation officers should be on call overnight to handle reports that a juvenile with an electronic monitoring bracelet has left his home. The legislature should pass a statute which would give juvenile courts the power to issue protection orders. H.B. 95 , passed in the last general assembly, which allows victims of sex offenses to obtain protection orders from a criminal court or domestic relations court, may not apply to juveniles. Source: Cracks in Justice System, Part I, Cracks in Justice System, Part II by Rachell Dissell, The Plain Dealer, Mar. 17, 2007; Juvenile Court to Get Full-time Magistrate by Rachell Dissell, The Plain Dealer, Mar. 14, 2007; Pressure is on Juvenile Court The Plain Dealer, Mar. 15, 2007.

March 04, 2007

A lawsuit filed in Franklin County alleges that youths were held beyond their minimum sentences because rehabilitation programs required as a condition for their release were not available. The Children's Law Center filed the lawsuit along with the Ohio Justice and Policy Center. Suit: Youths Held in Violation of Rights, Associated Press, The Plain Dealer, Mar. 3, 2007.