Hi Michael, Olemis,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:30 -0500, Olemis Lang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Michael Foord
> <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
> > On 10/02/2010 14:02, holger krekel wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This year i plan to work a lot on testing and Python - and one of my plans
> >> is to build up some collective computing resources for testing. Not tied
> >> to
> >> any particular testing tool or practise but rather to Continous
> >> Integration
> >> methods.
> >>
> >> Here is the practical start of this effort::
> >>
> >> http://testrun.org> >>
> >>
> >
> > The hudson output looks nice. Good work.
> >
>> And has intermittent green thingies (I like it !!!)
>> :P
thanks :)
If you two like to integrate dutest and unittest-ext own tests
you are very welcome :) You just need some junitxml output generating
mechanism and a way to checkout things with svn, hg or git to get
started. I believe (but haven't tried) that using "parametrized" builds
one could instrument it to test against different Python interpreter
versions - currently i do this rather manually.
What i like about hudson is that it's rather straight forward to setup and
configure TTW and can also be tweaked directly on the server from
the command line.
holger