2. Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Elective

Required

2.0

3

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

3 (100%)

3. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

5.0

3

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

3 (100%)

4. The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.67

3

0.58

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (33%)

2 (67%)

5. The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

3.33

3

1.53

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

1 (33%)

1 (33%)

0 (0%)

1 (33%)

6. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

Planning, the use of the map room in Hamilton library, making a site
plan, what to research before developing on a site, learning from artists
rather than only architects, architecture is not only built on land,
architecture and the environment.

Site analysis and evaluation of key elements in design.

7. The instructor was available for consultation with students.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.67

3

0.58

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (33%)

2 (67%)

8. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.

4. I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.5

2

0.71

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (50%)

5 (38%)

5. I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.0

2

1.41

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

1 (7%)

1 (50%)

0 (0%)

5 (36%)

6. I developed a greater sense of personal responsibility.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

3.5

2

0.71

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

1 (7%)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

0 (0%)

7. I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

3.0

2

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

7 (50%)

0 (0%)

8. I performed up to my potential in this course.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.29

14

0.73

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

6 (43%)

0 (0%)

9. I felt that this course challenged me intellectually.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.54

13

0.66

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

0 (0%)

10. Which aspects of the course were most valuable?

Learning about styles from different architects

The pictures and slide shows really helped me learn and understand.

The lectures slides were very informative and provided good visuals when
professor kazi taught. The research paper was also good to actually allow
ourselves to learn more about the architecture history.

The research paper and study model.

The lectures were the most valuable.

Expanding our architecture minds.

I definitely thought that his way of teaching was very informational and I learned a lot from it.

The lectures were enjoyable and I believe to be beneficial to my learning.

Kazi is an excellent teacher, the slide shows were valuable.

lecture

the information given about the history of architecture

11. Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

Doing models when we already have models due for studio.

all good :)

I think the analytical model required towards the end of the semester.

Nothing

Straight, monotone lectures.

I feel that the model project was not beneficial to my learning. It seemed like more of a
nusiance than an educational project.

final research paper

the models

12. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.79

14

0.43

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

13. The instructor stimulated me to think about the subject matter.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

3.5

2

0.71

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

0 (0%)

14. The instructor broadened my understanding and grasp of the subject.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.0

2

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (14%)

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

15. The instructor was enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.0

2

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

16. The instructor maintains an atmosphere of good feeling in class.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.0

2

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

7 (50%)

17. The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

3.0

2

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

1 (8%)

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

18. The instructor suggests specific ways students can improve.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.0

2

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

19. The instructor was available and willing to help with individual problems outside of class.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

3.5

2

0.71

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (50%)

7 (50%)

0 (0%)

20. The instructor uses class time well.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.57

14

0.65

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

21. Work requirements and grading system were clear from the beginning.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

3.5

2

0.71

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

0 (0%)

22. The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.5

2

0.71

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

23. The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.0

2

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

24. The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

4.0

2

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

8 (57%)

25. The instructor makes the course difficult enough to be stimulating.

Mean

N-Size

Std Dev

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

3.0

1

0.0

Freq(%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

26. What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?

Able to help outside of class hours.

love and and enthusiasm about the subject

He set a good classroom/lecture environment. His lectures were very
informative especially in the powerpoint slides he provided as visuals and
key phrases to note down. He was eloquent in teaching that it was easy to be
engaged in listening to his lectures. The amount of topics to study before
having a midterm was a reasonable amount.

How knowledgeable he is.

Kazi's powerpoints as well as his handouts were very helpful.

Very knowledgable

he definitely knew his facts and architecture. Also the pictures, handouts all combined together well along with his descriptions

Kazi offered help outside of the class, which i found helpful .

the lecture covers very good information

27. What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?

This could have been a writing intensive class due to the amount of writing that we did and all of it was due around the same time as studio work.

n/a

It was hard to tell what was going to be on the test or not.

Kazi assumed that we already had an extensive knowledge about famous architects as well as
their buildings. However, we are only in our second year of architecture school and to assume
that we all have this knowledge is unfair. Also, he used very complicated and long vocabulary
throughout his lectures which made it difficult for me to understand. Why not use plain words so
that everyone can grasp the concept and not get confused by a word they have not heard before.
Again, many of us are still young and although some may be able to understand him, everyone
will be able to understand simpler words. I truly believe this is why students have a hard time
grasping concepts and remembering information.

Not willing to talk in person

sometimes he would assume that we knew something and it would get confusing for some people to understand. we would have to

I dont think the analytical model should be required. The research paper and
having the ability to choose our topic was good enough for us to go on in
further research about the topics you have taught.

Better communication (one on one talking) rather than through emails.

find a way to make this class more interesting and lively

I feel that Kazi did not take into consideration the deadlines for other architecture classes
when assigning the model and research paper. Granted, we were given a month to work on
both, it would've helped us out a lot more to have these assignments given at seperate times,
preferably one that's assigned near the beginning of the semester. Also to have the deadlines
for this class to be far away enough from studio deadlines.

make the test a little easier

maybe giving a few more assignments over the semester instead of nothing, and then two huge projects right when finals are due

29. Global appraisal: Considering everything how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?