Ella's post has thrown up what could be seen as a potential problem. Do we limit the initial interviews to active members or do we allow any one to be interviewd? Personally I think we should stick to staff and those others that have been active over the last year or so. This will give less active posters a chance to make themselves known before going thorough the grill. Your thoughts would be appreciated.

_________________________Reality is an illusion brought about by lack of alcohol

That's a good idea. To interview say, a relatively new and fairly inactive person woudn't be interesting to the majority of members.

However, there have been at least 2 or 3 people that have registered since I have been here that have made an immediate impression. Within the first 2 months of posting they felt like old family. I think it should be left to a gut feeling, after following vague guidelines.

There is one person I don't see on the list: Terry. That is the person I would most like to see interviewed. I know he's the owner and pillar of this site, and probably won't, but I always wonder things like: What prompted you to even start Fun Trivia? How gratifying is it to work with so many wonderful volunteers? etc.

_________________________
If you can't sleep, then get up and do something instead of lying there worrying. It's the worry that gets you, not the lack of sleep.-Dale Carnegie