Do we only have #1, #2, #3 and #4? Or are there more numbered humans in the same series involved? Is the numbering in itself relevant or is it just used instead of names, to confuze us? Would anything change if we would have, for example: Man kills three. The next day he kills two. Four survived, and so one disappeared.

If there is any such combination which would yeald a relevant (or different than the majority) answer, could you spare me the listing of all the arrangements and say it?

Do we only have #1, #2, #3 and #4? Or are there more numbered humans in the same series involved? IrrIs the numbering in itself relevant Yesish or is it just used instead of names, to confuze us? YesWould anything change if we would have, for example: Man kills three. The next day he kills two. Four survived, and so one disappeared. Yes

If there is any such combination which would yeald a relevant (or different than the majority) answer, could you spare me the listing of all the arrangements and say it? The following sentences would work perfectly for the riddle as well and would give the same (or at least, very similar) answer: Man kills one. The next day, he kills four. Three survived, and so two disappeared. Man kills one. The next day, he kills three. Four survived, and so two disappeared. Man kills three. The next day, he kills one. Four survived, and so two disappeared. Man kills four. The next day, he kills one. Three survived, and so two disappeared. Man kills four. The next day, he kills three. One survived, and so two disappeared.

Would it also work if you changed it to: Man kills Charlie. The next day he kills David. Adam survived, and so Bob disappeared? Is "two" the Man? Is the one who survives the same as anyone of the two who were killed? The first or the second? Man?

Hmm....so the total always comes up to ten? YesDoes each number identify one single individual?YesWould it also work if you changed it to: Man kills Charlie. The next day he kills David. Adam survived, and so Bob disappeared? YesIs "two" the Man? YesIs the one who survives the same as anyone of the two who were killed? No Man? NoIs the numbering base on some sort of ranking? No

were they part of an organization? Noish did someone give them those names? Yes

was killing "One" his only original intention? Nowere Three or Four involved in One's survival? Nodid the man intend to kill himself? NoWas "one" the number one target? NoWere they all part of the same group? YesWere they prisoners? NoWas he ordered to kill the others? No

So do the men in question wear numbered jackets? Or numbered vests, like Olympic sprinters? And he was number 2? indeed sir!

***SPOILER***

The men are sprinters. The Two knew that he didn't stand a chance against the other, so he wanted to kill the others so that he would be the one who gets the medal. But when he tried to kill One, he failed, and One called the police to arrest Two.