Re: Import Question

In article <fdeaab$vc0$1_at_news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com says...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----> Hash: SHA1> > hjr.pythian_at_gmail.com wrote:> > On Sep 26, 4:35 am, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor..._at_gmail.com>> > wrote:> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----> >> Hash: SHA1> >>> >> not produce errors != constraint violations> >> but more generic than that> >> - --> >> Regards,> >> Frank van Bortel> >>> > > > Bearing in mind that the original question was, "is Oracle smart> > enough to import things in an order that will not produce errors?",> > give me an error, Frank, that will be caused by changing the order of> > import of tables which ISN'T a constraint violation.> > > > Creating indexes before the tables on which they're supposed to be> > built doesn't count, because import has never been that stupid.> > > You miss the point.> > It's not just about constraints or the order of tables.> The original question was more generic, and yes, sometimes> you'll get errors because dependent objects do not> (yet) exist: procedures, functions, packages and views to name> a few, can either be invalid and need to be recompiled, or are> not created at all, which can happen with views.
>

Woaw ! When is a view not created at all, Frank ?
Received on Wed Sep 26 2007 - 12:59:18 CDT