1.CO2 is good for plant life
2. The Earth is greening
3. For significant periods of earth’s history there have been significantly more CO2 in atmosphere which did not come from burning fossil fuels.
4. For 18 years both balloon and satellite data show no warming
5. That satellite and balloon are the best evidence of whether the earth is currently warming
6. That seas were increasing more in 1st half of 20th century
7.That the computer models – that say we have to raise cost of living of all and make it harder to make ends meet – are profoundly wrong and inconsistent with the data and evidence.
(there should be eight – I’ve either missed one or doubled up)

Go Tony!!!!
While the climate criminals are all sipping champagne in Paris, the real politicking, with the likely new VPOTUS if not POTUS, is happening in DC. Well done mate! Couldn’t be happier for you.

I wish he would. It’s a shame Admiral Titley didn’t ask Cruz for the source of that graph.
Admiral Titley: “From Steve Goddard’s blog you say? So if you are elected President, will you use claims from blogs as a source of reliable science information Senator?”

You just don’t understand. Facts get tainted when they pass through impure hands. By the act of reprinting it, Tony has completely invalidated that graph. Truth isn’t objective. It’s a team sport. And Tony is on the wrong team.

Hey Ted! Yes, I think you nailed it. CAGW enthusiasts look at “climate science” as a team sport. You are either with them or you are the enemy. Some years back, my brother (who happens to be an alarmist) was stunned when I explained to him (at his request) why I did not think that CAGW was real. Did he attempt to refute either my data or my logic? No! His deep and heartfelt response was “Why, you are on RUSH LIMBAUGH’S side!”

So you have no issue with annual revisions to data by “the team” for “the cause”, and no issue with “the team” making up fake data for “the cause”, but when Tony posts actual data you throw a fit. Nice!

Another moron who doesn’t understand that you can enter data into excel or any other program that presents it graphically, and it doesn’t change the data. So, making a graph of data is misrepresenting it? You are an imbecile.

Only a complete moron would average absolute temperatures instead of anomalies and ignore the history of non-climatic changes to weather stations. It’s a moronic as adding up and averaging the times in a bus timetable and expecting anything meaningful. 😀

Even better, we have a US President who uses imaginary data from junk-science conspiracy grantologists to frighten citizens into giving up liberties.
He makes military decisions based on how he feels about fairness and white privilege.

Well, sure, Gail, why would ceist8 want to trust charts of original NOAA data when he can just as easily get predigested opinions from a website operated by a cartoonist who thinks that Nazi-dress-up is a great lark?

Yes, I can see you prefer swallowing the lunatic junk-science rantings of someone who fraudulently pretended to be a climate scientist called ‘Steve Goddard’ before he got exposed as a fraud. You prefer to gullibly swallow the moronic ideas of someone who thinks adding up and averaging absolute temperatures makes any sense. He could add up the numbers in your local bus timetable and tell you it was an average temperature and you would believe him 😀

ceist8 You would represent a “head in butt syndrome” as presented above, but you’re “butt” is that of a troll.! I gather, you’re one of the gullible morons that also believes the history of Global Warming Predictions came true..?
…………..
Like the Seas have flooded the World’s harbors & Children won’t experience Snow ; plus Ice free Arctic Summers & all the Warmist BS papers that failed spectacularly.
…………..
The Warmist “tampered Data” doesn’t correlate with outcomes… think about it.!
From there , work backwards and you will find the missing link ; your mindset.