Black Triangle UFOs and an Alleged Breakaway Civilization- Discuss

At least one of the "Doritos" sightings was a documented authorised military tip off but dropping 2 seperate projects in a general conspiracy forum
and providing a narrative with photographic evidence does surely qualify as unprecedented- authorised or not.

Which were the "Doritos" sightings? Over Texas? I wonder if Bassplyr's craft was also one of these.

So here we go... back to the meat of the matter... obvious "insider" knowledge of where/when classified craft could be seen along with a more than
merely plausible explanation of how they operate.

Yes, far above other internet "disclosures" of it's ilk... thus the reason a few of us are running in tight circles over this incident.

I'm still leaning in the "Huh, wow... maybe it IS true" camp... with amending it to "partly true" when around sane people.

I am still running thought trains about how it fits with the narrative IF true... and it fits pretty well, excepting those pesky older UFO sightings.

But his pre-RK stuff is, so far, solid as it gets in UFOland.

EDIT: and a thought occurred to me... IF it's a tall tale, why did he spoil it with the hard-to-swallow RK- no aliens stuff? He could have said we got
it from Roswell and been done with it and he would have had more adoring fans swallowing it completely... my own wrestling is over what I thought I
knew about "aliens" after all, and I cannot be alone...

2 different types of aircraft (probably)
2 separate sightings
1 one of the sightings as a result of a "tip off"
Article bizarrely suggests the flurry of black triangle activity in 2014 was timed to co-incide with a law suit relating to the "cancelled" A12...

Bassplyrs sighting was low level silent so cant see anything to suggest those craft would have that capability given the pics....
Astr0 was NOT connected to the "Dorito" sightings ( as far as I know!)

I keep forgetting is Kansas or texas the big white colored one that everybody thought was a B2? Cause that one is in my opinion a huge development
strategically. I could see that never coming to light any time soon.

There is a well confirmed pattern historically
where nearly ALL people who get too close
to genuine high strangeness self-destruct..
going from sem-credible to complete loony
tunes. There must be a thousand documented
cases in Vallees files alone.

Now I'm not saying that is what happened
to the original original poster. ..I don't
know and even if I did it would be against
the T & C to say that.

I don't see any mystery here at all, of
any kind whatsoever. Just more
rinse repeat that has been going on
for centuries/millenia. IMHO
of course.

Agreed... it could very well be... and trust me, I know all about the destruction of those poor souls who get a glimpse out of Plato's Cave.

And this could very well be one of those instances where someone shows up with an outlandish claim, makes some minor miracles, and then scurries back
to dimension X or whatever strange rock they dwell under... the lore IS full of them... the guy in Chicago with the water as fuel source in the 70's
comes to mind, and the long line of alchemical jesters who turned lumps of lead into gold and melted away into fantasy land.

Now that's interesting. The prototype for the Red October. I thought they just tried adding MHD to the propulsor area like a sheath that surrounded
it of a few Ohios. That's a story worth sharing if you can. PM is cool too if not on the public boards. That's pretty sweet if you got to tour
the inside of a SSBN.

Now that's interesting. The prototype for the Red October. I thought they just tried adding MHD to the propulsor area like a sheath that surrounded
it of a few Ohios. That's a story worth sharing if you can. PM is cool too if not on the public boards. That's pretty sweet if you got to tour the
inside of a SSBN.

I can't really talk about it. It's not a huge secret by any means..
heck, it might be in Janes Fighting Ships by now. But at the
TIME, it got me a high clearance.

All I will say, is that the prototype for that type propulsion
system sat right next to the one I was trained on, that
wasn't as whoopedy doo.

I was a nuclear engineroom supervisor for 7 years.. I was
on two nuclear cruisers and one nuclear aircraft carrier,
however, not on a boomer or fast attack sub.

2 different types of aircraft (probably)
2 separate sightings
1 one of the sightings as a result of a "tip off"
Article bizarrely suggests the flurry of black triangle activity in 2014 was timed to co-incide with a law suit relating to the "cancelled" A12...

Bassplyrs sighting was low level silent so cant see anything to suggest those craft would have that capability given the pics....
Astr0 was NOT connected to the "Dorito" sightings ( as far as I know!)

I do remember a comment from Astr0. One of the pictures of high-altitude aircraft (I think Kansas) showed a significant lighting on the leading edge.
I wrote that I wonder if it is not merely a result of sunlight. Astr0 said something which implied it was quite important. My default explanation
was leading-edge plasma but that was not confirmed (and i'm not sure, as the glow was pretty bright, and white; for plasma one expects fairly dim and
blue-purple).

This is the one I wonder if it's the same as Bassplyr's. LA triangle. Bass, does that look like yours? The semi-internal white-lighting, though not
at each corner, is the connecting factor. Maybe a variant?

It could be due to an ablative skin. A hypersonic vehicle, or close to hypesonic vehicle would compress the air in front of it, causing the heat to
rise. The lighting across the leading edge and nose of the vehicle could be a result of the ablation. That's just a guess, though.

Hate to do this to you, but nope. Don't look alike. Wrong color. Mine was a matte grey and I believe much smaller. I think I know what that one
is you are referring to. I believe it's relatively large and has a different although very important roll.

In regards to that light in the front. Didn't he who shall not be named say something in a different thread in regards to something else where he
said "And now with light!" Might be a good avenue to explore.

Nope doesn't look like that either. That could be something using similar tech. Mine didn't have the center light. The outer lights were pale blue.
Triangle was not black but matte grey. Same size thou. More sleek from what I can tell.

Hate to do this to you, but nope. Don't look alike. Wrong color. Mine was a matte grey and I believe much smaller.

I wouldn't quite be so hung up on the color---actually it seems the color might be a matte grey if on the ground but the intensity/brightness
different. In the picture, it's clearly at a high altitude in daylight, and as a result there would be substantially more air between the camera and
the craft, and thus more blue light scattering in front of the craft, changing it's apparent color/blending it with "blue sky". The pic looks like
a 'merge' between blue sky + grey which would be accurate in this scenario.

Of course matte grey is hardly distinguishing air craft, for the very reason above most military aircraft are by default colored matte grey (at
typical cruise altitudes it blends in best).

im positive the two are not the same craft. I am pretty sure the craft in that photo is much bigger and has a different roll. A cool roll but not
the same at all. I think Lockheed even put a CGI psudo version of it in their commercials.

But that leading edge and its light. Surely light can do more than help blend things in. remember the quote "and now with light!!!" that he who
shall not be named made.

On a separate note. if that was the craft I saw then why'd the camera man see it? Get it? Here's one to mess with you. Maybe it's not the
aircrafts fault one wouldn't be able to see it. it's all in the mind of the beholder.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.