This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our world. Watch and become AWARE!
3.5 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.

Thursday, August 3, 2017

In
response to my solution--- nationalizing the banks and keeping the
account system intact--- I have gotten back no end of palaver about
Glass-Steagall and the evils of investment banks and derivatives and the
corrupt Securities and Exchange Commission, blah, blah, blah.

The people responding in this way are so indoctrinated that they can't read the words on the page and grasp what I said.

In
America, the word "national" means "state". This is because this
country is composed of fifty separate nation-states. Therefore, "First
National Bank of Anchorage" means "First State Bank of Anchorage". And
when I say, "nationalize the banks" I clearly mean that the states---
the actual states--- should take over the banks operating within their
borders and force them to operate in a responsible and honest fashion.

In our case, because of our unique heritage
and foundational structure, every state is a separate nation with its
own statehood compact. In America, the word "international" means
"interstate" and vice-versa. When you cross over a state border, you
are entering another nation--- just like when you cross the border
between Belgium and France.

By agreement, the
states have relaxed their borders to promote trade and transportation
and via the infamous "interstate commerce clause" they even authorized
the federal service provider running the delegated services contract
the responsibility to "regulate" interstate trade so as to expedite it
and ensure free access to goods and services. That does not imply that
the federal government has any special right to meddle with banking
conducted within any state of the Union.

I
said we need to "nationalize the banks" and so the talking heads
naturally assumed that had to have something to do with federal
take-overs and federal legislation------ pardon me?

We
have fifty nation-states. Banking is the business of those states, or
in international "waters", it is the business of their primary
association of states, doing business as the unincorporated United
States of America.

The only banks that the
Congress is supposed to control are commercial banks and they aren't
doing the job. So when I say "nationalize" the banks, I am saying
bluntly and purely that the states need to exercise their actual
statehood compacts and take over the banks within their borders,
including the failed commercial banks which are now bankrupt.

Any
non-existent federated "nation" run by the failed and chronically
corrupt "U.S. Congress" needs to get out of the kitchen. They were dumb
enough and corrupt enough to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act and let
loose the final corruption of the commercial banks, thereby proving
beyond any doubt that they are incompetent to transact any business
related to us and our states. The present situation should be enough to
convince anyone of that.

Every commercial
bank on this planet is bankrupt and subject to its creditors. We, the
American states and people, are the Paramount Security Interest Holders
and Priority Creditors. Those who would "presume" that we abandoned
our assets would be making a self-interested and criminal false claim
on abandonment without any sovereign power or standing to do so.

When
you delegate power, you retain the right to take back that power in
the face of the obvious failure of those delegated to perform.

The
members of Congress, the Presidents, the Judges, the various Generals,
and the whole shebang have been given Due Notice and Due Process for
over twenty years, telling them politely, point-blank, that they are
not getting the job done. Their job performance is either
non-existent, or it is incompetent and inadequate to meet the
requirements of any contract we have with them. So the grounds for the
severance is already there, and in fact, it already exists.

They
have not provided the services they have contracted to provide and
have otherwise messed things up so badly that nobody in their right mind
would continue to pay them for such "service". They have been given
plenty of Notice and Due Process releasing them from their contract,
and that is fortunate, because the federal Municipal government has
been bankrupt and in liquidation since 2015 and the federal Territorial
government has been bankrupt and in reorganization since May.

Read
that---- even if they wanted to do the right thing now, they couldn't,
because they are in receivership all the way across the board.

Now
what? We, that American states and people, are the Paramount Security
Interest Holders and Priority Creditors of both the Territorial and
Municipal United States. Back in November of 2015, we chose new
federal partners in order to preserve the actual Constitution----which
would otherwise be vacated by these federal bankruptcies.

The
American Native Nations have separate federal charters formed by
Treaty, similar to the statehood compacts, and are therefore "federal"
entities without being subject to the federal bankruptcies. They
aren't merely "franchises" like the State of State organizations.

By
partnering with the Athabascans and the Lakota Sioux to be our federal
service providers under the constraints of the actual Constitution, we
have provided the means for a smooth transition of our constitutional
government despite the bankruptcy of the failed despots in Washington,
DC.

The responsibility of government resides
with the unincorporated United States of America and with the
individual sovereign states and in the face of the incompetence of both
the Territorial and Municipal United States, the federal role has been
transferred to the American Native Nations and the responsibility for
the individual state government functions returns to the actual land
jurisdiction state governments.

We are "re-venued" and in position to reclaim all our assets.

We
have issued our renewed Sovereign Letters Patent, we have updated our
National Trust, we have established our International Trade Bank, we
have clarified and established our standing on the public record, we
have a viable international currency -- the American Silver Dollar --
and via our federal partners, the American Native Nations, we have
representation in the United Nations.

We
have placed our non-UCC and agricultural liens upon all the State of
State and STATE OF STATE organizations as well as their parent
corporations. We have established our international private registered
indemnity bonds and we have also established our international payment
bond so that there can be no complaint against us and no suit brought
against our sovereign assets.

We are not
bankrupt simply because our Housekeeping Service goes bankrupt and our
assets are not subject to their bankruptcy, either.

And
this is all possible precisely because in America, "national" means
"state" and because the unincorporated United States of America is and
has always been in control of all aspects of international powers, both
delegated and non-delegated, on land and on the sea, retroactive to
the moment the British Monarch and the then-Pope secretly breached our
national trust in 1822.

We are free to write
our own future and to recoup from past history all the assets that are
owed to us and to our actual land jurisdiction states of the Union.

All
this is possible because in America, the word "nation" means "state"
and because the unincorporated United States of America is still here,
still functioning and still acting under the retained rights of the
American states and people.

I wish to draw
it to everyone's attention, again, that America is not the "United
States". These are two distinct and profoundly different entities each
foreign to the other, and they always have been.

The
bankruptcy of the federal Municipal and Territorial United States in no
way implies any bankruptcy on the part of the Continental United
States--- meaning the actual states and people --- who are in fact the
Paramount Security Interest Holders and Priority Creditors of all
Municipal and Territorial United States holdings and franchises.

Please
support the continuing effort to bring these facts forward. Our team
is working around the clock to make sure that every impacted government
and every American who stands to be swindled otherwise, is made aware
of the circumstance. We need your help and support to spread the word
and pursue the legal and other work necessary to reclaim the
birthrights of our own and many other nations.

----------------------------

See this article and over 600 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

11

Followers

The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.