Gohranson et al v. Snohomish County et al

Filing
86

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
JOHN T. GOHRANSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
9
NO. C16-1124RSL
v.
10
11
12
ORDER RENOTING MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
On December 5, 2017, the defendants in this matter filed five separate motions for
15
summary judgment, all noted for consideration on December 29, 2017.1 Defendants submitted
16
over 1250 combined pages in support of their requests for dispositive relief. Given the
17
intervening holiday, it is unreasonable to expect plaintiffs to respond within the normal briefing
18
schedule. The Clerk of Court is directed to renote the pending motions for summary judgment
19
(Dkt. # 72, 74, 76, 80, and 82) on the Court’s calendar for Friday, January 12, 2018.
20
Dated this 6th day of December, 2017.
21
A
22
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
1
Defendant Snohomish County filed two motions, each aimed at discrete claims, in violation of
LCR 7(e)(3).
27
28
ORDER RENOTING MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.