A press of business has hitherto prevented me from replying to your letter of the 10th.

“The Vestiges of Creation” I have not yet seen; and it is always unsafe and unwise to form opinions
of books from reviews of them. The extracts of the work which have fallen in my way, abound in inaccuracies of fact: — still
these may not materially affect the general argument. One thing is certain; that the objections of merely scientific men
— men, I mean, who cultivate the physical sciences to the exclusion, in a greater or less degree, of the mathematics, of
metaphysics and of logic — are generally invalid except in respect to scientific details. Of all persons in the world,
they are at the same time the most bigoted and the least capable of using, generalizing, or deciding upon the facts which they bring to
light in the course of their experiments. And these are the men who chiefly write the criticisms against all efforts at
generalization — denouncing these efforts as “speculative” and “theoretical”.

The notice of my Lecture, which appeared in the “New-World”, was written by some one grossly
incompetent to the task which he undertook. No idea of what I said can [page 2:] be gleaned from
either that or any other of the newspaper notices — with the exception, perhaps, of the “Express”
— where the critique was written by a gentleman of much scientific acquirement — Mr E. A. Hopkins, of Vermont. I
enclose you his Report — which, however, is inaccurate in numerous particulars. He gives my general conception so, at
least, as not to caricature it.

I have not yet published the “Lecture[”], but, when I do so, will have the pleasure of mailing you
a copy. In the meantime, permit me to state, succinctly, my principal results.

GENERAL PROPOSITION. Because Nothing was, therefore All Things are.

1 — An inspection of the universality of Gravitation — of the fact that each particle tends
not to any one common point — but to every other particle — suggests perfect totality, or absolute unity, as
the source of the [p]haenomenon.

2. Gravity is but the mode in which is manifested the tendency of all things to return into their original unity.

3. I show that the law of the return — i.e the law of gravity — is but a necessary result of the
necessary and sole possible mode of equable irradiation of matter through a limiter space.

4. Were the Universe of stars — (contradistinguished from the universe of space) unlimited, no worlds could
exist.

5. I show that Unity is Nothingness.

6. All matter, springing from Unity, sprang from Nothingness. i e, was created.

7. All will return to Unity; i e — to Nothingness. I would be obliged to you if you would let me know how far
these ideas are coincident with those of the “Vestiges”.