Real Science Vs Climate Fraud

Treason against humanity, that’s what the climate change manmade global warming scam is all about. Those foolish enough to believe in their government and in the press, are taken in to the treason. This treason will end up with uncountable people freezing to death because everyone is being led to prepare for warming instead of the cold.

The American government is lying about climate change. Steven Goddard’s US blog Real Science shows how shamelessly manipulated has been one of the world’s most influential climate records, the graph of US surface temperature records published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Goddard shows how, in recent years, NOAA’s US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been “adjusting” its record by replacing real temperatures with data “fabricated” by computer models. The effect of this has been to downgrade earlier temperatures and to exaggerate those from recent decades, to give the impression that the Earth has been warming up much more than is justified by the actual data. Goddard concludes, “This leaves only two realistic possibilities. The freezing point of water has changed since 1967 US winters are getting colder, and the NCDC adjustments are complete garbage.”

Forbes Magazine puts its finger on the global warming scam. “Global warming activists are in full-throttle damage control, desperately claiming global warming causes record snow and cold,” says Forbes. “When global warming alarmists claim winters will become warmer and free of snow, yet their predictions are proven false for 20 years in a row, at some point logical people come to realize that global warming alarmists are selling snake oil.”

Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, chairperson of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, has written a book claiming that global warming is “the greatest hoax” and a “conspiracy.” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, told NASA to concentrate on space and forget about climate change saying, “Stop talking so much about the terrible things we’re doing to our planet and just go away. Far, far away.”

Australian Bureau of Meteorology caught erasing cold temperatures. “Amazing, the power of the media. Lance Pidgeon and Jennifer Marohasy have been watching the automatic weather stations record very cold temperatures, and then astonished when those same readings either got entered into our national raw database as warmer, or simply disappeared. The BOM apparently has a filter set so that super cold temperatures need to be manually checked. Yet the filter is set so high, in Thredbo’s case, nearly five whole degrees warmer than temperatures already recorded.”

It is good to remember that Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s top business advisor went public in May 2015 claiming climate change was a ruse encouraged by the United Nations to create a new authoritarian world order under its control. Maurice Newman, chairperson of the Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council, said the real agenda was “concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook”.

In a column for The Australian newspaper to coincide with a visit by UN climate chief Christiana Figueres, he added that the world had been “subjected to extravagance from climate catastrophists for close to 50 years”. “It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 percent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error,” he said, without providing evidence.

The Washington Times puts it this way, “The U.S. government is at it again, hyping meaningless records in a parameter that does not exist in order to frighten us about something that doesn’t matter. In the final analysis, it is no more meaningful to calculate an average temperature for a whole planet than it is to calculate the average telephone number in the Washington D.C. phone book. Temperature, like viscosity and density, and of course phone numbers, is not something that can be meaningfully averaged. “Global temperature” does not exist.”

Three senior House Democrats went over the deep end on Monday and asked U.S. teachers to destroy a book written by climate scientists challenging the environmentalist view of global warming. Democratic Reps. Bobby Scott of the Committee on Education, Raúl M. Grijalva of the Committee on Natural Resources, and Eddie Bernice Johnson of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology all issued a statement that let the world know that they have lost their minds.

“Public school classrooms are no place for anti-science propaganda, and I encourage every teacher to toss these materials in the recycling bin,” Scott said. Keeping with the anti-science propaganda of ex-president Obama, we now know that Democrats will stop at nothing to promote absurdity wherever they can. The book’s three authors all hold doctorates and taught climate or related science at the university level.

In today’s Democrat influenced world, science is created out of thin air just by saying something. Obama did not know what he is talking about when he says 99.5 percent of scientists in the world say this is a really urgent problem. Here is a list of 169 scientists who challenge the political propaganda on global warming. In addition, here is a list 31,487 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, who also challenge the global warming scenario.

It is terrible to lie about the weather, to convince half of humanity that we are facing danger through global warming even though we are actually facing global cooling because the sun is going through some down time. Just as they hid the truth about 9-11 they hide the fact that the sun is what warms and cools the earth more than any other factor though there are other factors. House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith said during a recent hearing that NOAA “has deceived the American people by falsifying data to justify a partisan agenda. So again, why would president Trump allow the deception to get any airtime?

The narrative of global warming does not make sense, never did really. The widening gap between “definitive” claims and actual evidence is dooming global warming, as is the hard reality that CO2 is not the demon element. It is a plant and human friendly gas that makes life better not worse.

According to Dr. Richard Lindzen from MIT the earth goes through natural periods of global warming and cooling. Natural means human activity has little or nothing to do with these cycles. According to Dr. Lindzen, the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are problematic and limited because they are based on computer models, which Lindzen says are “generally recognized as experimental tools whose relation to the real world is questionable.”

According to the American government we are living through the warmest time in history. Most people today do not believe this, yet many have had their minds so conditioned by the media it does not matter what the truth is or how cold it gets. The truth has been on display for years with this above image taken almost four years ago in July just being one example. No one believed that record breaking heat would lead to ice on Lake Superior in July.

Back in 1974, the National Science Board announced: “During the last 20 to 30 years, world temperature has fallen, irregularly at first but more sharply over the last decade. Judging from the record of the past interglacial ages, the present time of high temperatures should be drawing to an end…leading into the next ice age.”

Apollo 7 astronaut Walter Cunningham says about global warming, “A lot of it is pure nonsense and wishful thinking on the part of the alarmists who are looking for more and more money to fall into their hands.”Lenar Whitney, Louisiana State Representative goes even further stating, “It is perhaps the greatest deception in the history of mankind. Global Warming is designed to give more power to the executive branch, while increasing taxes in a progressive’s dream to regulate every aspect of American life ­ from our light bulbs to our thermostat.”

The past few years have seen their cherished cause of global warming crumbling on all sides. The Copenhagen climate conference, planned to make carbon slaves out of humanity, collapsed in disarray. The Climategate emails scandal confirmed that scientists at the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had distorted key data. The IPCC’s own authority was further rocked by revelations that its more alarmist claims about global warming were based not on science but on the inventions of environmental activists.

The Wall Street Journal reported, “The assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction.” Most scientists are not into fantasy like politicians tend to be. In fact more than 31,000 scientists believe “there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”

Physicist Vladimir Paar has already been predicting a time when most of central Europe will be covered in ice again. It is inevitable—a coming Ice Age—it’s Nature, it’s a cycle, it’s the sun doing what it always does and it probably also has something to do with orbital cycles and other complicated stuff.

“Most of Europe will be under ice, including Germany, Poland, France, Austria, Slovakia, and a part of Slovenia,” said the professor Paar from Croatia’s Zagreb University, who has spent decades analyzing previous ice ages in Europe and what caused them. The freeze will be so complete that people will be able to walk from England to Ireland or across the North Sea from Scotland to northern Europe.

Vladimir Paar said, “They might migrate to the south, or might stay, but with a huge needed increase in energy use.” The Ice Age “could happen in five, 10, 50, or 100 years, or even later. We can’t predict it precisely, but it will come. The reality is that mankind needs to start preparing for the ice age. We are at the end of the global-warming period. The ice age is to follow. Paar says it will still be possible for man to survive in the ice age, but the spending on energy will be enormous. “Food production also might be a problem. It would need to be produced in greenhouses with a lot of energy spent to heat them.”

We are told on a daily basis that “97 percent” of climate scientists agree that manmade climate change will doom the world within a generation. Politicians and the media have made it their business to lie about global warming.

Four institutions, the Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos (PMOD), the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG), ETH Zurich and the University of Bern, all have come out admitting that the sun dominates the earth’s climate. They say that burning fossil fuels is less important than computer models first suggested.

“After decades of research with billions of research funds spent, there is less scientific evidence than ever before of any linkage between carbon dioxide levels in the air and the global mean temperature, or the proclaimed “catastrophic” ocean level rise. Au contraire, increasingly the evidence points to CO2 as a global atmospheric cooling agent and some sea levels are even falling,” concludes Dr. L.E. Kaiser.

Professor Valentina Zharkova at Northumbria University is just one example of a scientist being attacked by global warming proponents for publishing research suggesting there could be a 35-year period of low solar activity that could usher in an “ice age.” Zharkova and her team of researchers released a study on sunspot modeling, finding that solar activity could fall to levels not seen since the so-called “Little Ice Age” of the 1600s. She is just one of many scientists who have warned us but presidents and Popes have just chosen to ignore them.

Professor Khabibullo Abdusamatov

The head of the Space Research section of the Russian Academy of Science, Professor Khabibullo Abdussamatov, in 2006 issued a press release, warning that the world should prepare for imminent global cooling. He predicted that the next ice age would start in 2012 – 2015, and would likely peak around 2055. He was looking to the most obvious reason global cooling is happening—the sun.

Astrophysicists have been aware for years of what is going on in the sun and their predictions are for cooling not warming. “We can expect the onset of a deep bicentennial minimum of total solar irradiance (TSI) in approximately 2042±11 and the 19th deep minimum of global temperature in the past 7500 years – in 2055±11. After the maximum of solar cycle 24, from approximately 2014 we can expect the start of deep cooling with a Little Ice Age in 2055±11,” states Abdussamatov.

By 2041, solar activity will reach its minimum according to a 200-year cycle, and a deep cooling period will hit the Earth in 2055-2060. It will last for about 45-65 years. “By the mid-21st century the planet will face another Little Ice Age, similar to the Maunder Minimum, because the amount of solar radiation hitting the Earth has been constantly decreasing since the 1990s and will reach its minimum approximately in 2041,” Abdusamatov said.

Solar cycle 24 continues to rank among the weakest on record, which continues the recent trend for increasingly weaker cycles. The current predicted and observed size makes this the smallest sunspot cycle since Cycle 14, which had a maximum of 64.2 in February of 1906. Going back to 1755, there have been only a few solar cycles in the previous 23 that have had a lower number of sunspots during its maximum phase. For this reason, many solar researchers are calling this current solar maximum a “mini-max”. Solar cycle 24 began after an unusually deep solar minimum that lasted from 2007 to 2009. In fact, in 2008 and 2009, there were almost no sunspots, a very unusual situation during a solar minimum phase that had not happened for almost a century.

“Global warming is nowhere to be found. The mean global temperature has not risen in 17 years and has been slowly falling for approximately the past 10 years. In 2013, there were more record-low temperatures than record-high temperatures in the United States. At the end of the first week in January, a brutal spell of cold weather settled over most of the country. Multiple cold-temperature records were shattered across the country. Some sites experienced frigid conditions not seen since the 19th century. Chicago and New York City broke temperature records set in 1894 and 1896, respectively. These extremes were not singular, but exemplary of conditions throughout much of the continent. Temperatures in Chicago were so cold that a polar bear at the Lincoln Park Zoo had to be taken inside,” wrote David Deming, a geophysicist, professor of arts and sciences at the University of Oklahoma, in early 2014.