The "C" word: An American taboo
By Steve Farrell
web posted April 22, 2002
In journalism, some subjects are strictly taboo. Here's one:
Politicians, pundits, and professors can talk about capitalists
conspiring together to form monopolies and cartels -even to the
point of rigid regulation and prosecution of such activity via the
Justice Department.
Politicians, pundits, and professors can talk about right wing
religious fanatics conspiring together to form terrorist
organizations - even to the point of waging worldwide "open-
ended" wars - in hopes of "rooting them out."
Politician, pundits, and professors can talk about "vast right wing
conspiracies" burning down black churches, bombing abortion
clinics, beating up on gays, and blowing up federal buildings -
even to the point of radically reigning in our freedoms in order to
insure such activities never occur again.
And politician, pundits, and professors can talk about rich and
greedy Enron executives conspiring together to deny the little
man his fair share of a sinking ship's booty - even to the point of
moving the government ever closer to the elimination of all
private economic activity so as to guarantee worker and investor
security.
But never, oh never can the "The Three P's" dare talk about,
dare regulate or eradicate conspiring men o the left. This is why:
Such men on the left don't exist, and have in fact, never existed,
except in the minds of Art Bell fans.
Admit it. The left (I include globalists) accuse and regulate the
right for conspiracies. The right, however, is forbidden from
counter-accusing, counter-regulating the left for conspiracies.
Yet, clearly, the left involves itself as principals, provocateurs,
participants, and partisans, in the same activities, meaning in
monopolies, terrorism, bombings, and persecuting employees.
Moreover, the left has a history of orchestrating protests,
boycotts, parades, editorials, lawsuits, violence, and revolution,
with but one goal in mind, eradicating "the Four Corrupt C's:
Colonialism, Constitutionalism, Capitalism, and Judeo-
Christianity.
But never mind. The right must keep their peace. The right must
concede that the right, because it is the Capitalist, always
exploits, bullies, and conspires to sustain its profitable, ruling
class position; and that the left, because it is the victim, always
"spontaneously" arises in loose temporary groupings and
alliances, which of necessity, step forward to correct social,
economic, and political injustice wherever it is found.
If you believe that, I've got some white sand, palm tree-laden
property to sell you in the tropics of Antarctica.
But then again, this politically correct thinking prevails.
And so, in honor of such thinking, this weeks "Leftist, Globalist
Apologist, There-Ain't-No-Such-Thing-as-a-Left-Wing-
Conspiracy Award" goes to David Rockefeller, founder of the
Trilateral Commission, for his – "Hah! Hah!, Hee! Hee!" - retort
in the April 6, Washington Times, in reference to conspiracy
theories persistently besieging the Trilateral Commission.
Before proceeding, for those unfamiliar with the Trilateral
Commission, here's a quick synopsis: As the name Trilateral
reflects, their mission is to divide the world into three regional
trade regimes, or three regional super-governments, as an interim
step toward world government.
David Rockefeller, at the time of the commission's creation,
confessed that Zbigniew Brzezinski's book "Between Two Ages,
" gave him the inspiration for the commission, and thus, the
appointment of Brzezinski as its first director, was a natural. Yet,
in that book, Brzezinski called Marxism, "the best available
insight into contemporary reality," and outlined the goal of the
Trilateral Commission as being: "[the forging of a] community of
the developed nations that would embrace the Atlantic states, the
more advanced European communist states, and Japan" as a
stepping stone to world government. Dub them, as did Orwell,
Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia.
I'm not sure what could be more clear, other than to add that an
upfront call for world government was deemed too bold, too
likely to arouse suspicion among America's sleeping
conservatives. Progressive regionalization was thought better,
hence the Trilateral Commission.
All this being true, though known by too few Americans, yet Mr.
Rockefeller, in the aforementioned Washington Times article,
responded to "conspiracy/shadow government" charges as being
"absurd . . . but, to some extent, . . . amusing," as did the
commission's press officer, Francois Sauzey.
The "afraid to say the "C" word," Washington Times, let the two
dismiss the "loonies" on the right, without a thoughtful
counterbalance.
OK fine. That's my point.
What matters is intent. So, of course, when leftist globalists plan
on regional government, leading to world government, leading to
a world Marxist order, it is only like-minded individuals coming
together, only non-politically aligned progressives planning
ahead, it is only realists coming to grips with growing
interdependence and widespread injustice, and it is only
capitalists stabilizing world markets. Intent is everything. And
when it comes to the left - you can rest assured - intent is always
pure.
Contact Steve at cyours76@yahoo.com
Enter Stage Right - http://www.enterstageright.com