Fasullo v. Fasullo

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Murphy, Chief District Judge

ORDER

On June 21, 2007, the Court entered an order directing the Clerk of Court to return unfiled any additional motions submitted by Plaintiff challenging the dismissal of the action (Doc. 51). Nonetheless, Plaintiff thereafter filed a motion "to inquire into the detention of any per" (Doc. 52) and a document entitled "Judicial Notice" (Doc. 53).

Plaintiff attempts to evade the Court's order with both of these motions. In the first (Doc. 52), he asks that the Court "inquire into the detention of any per," which the Court construes as a motion to again look at the merits of his case. In the second (Doc. 53), he asks the Court, "does the honorable see fraud or mistake," which is clearly an attempt to have the Court review the merits of his complaint. Despite what Plaintiff calls these filings, both are barred by the Court's June 21st order. Therefore, these filings (Docs. 52 and 53) are STRICKEN from the docket.

Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.