There is nothing in it that violates a rule. I quoted a portion of a previous post by a member and said I liked his post. I changed nothing in the quote. The member alledges that I am trying to make it appear that he is the author. He is in fact the source, since it is taken verbatim from his post. I was careful to preserve the original quote within quote format of his original post to clearly show that he had originally presented it as an unattributed quote. My quote contains the proper link back to his post which you can follow to verify. This is simply a matter of frivolous reporting by one or more individuals who have an axe to grind.