Alistair Whyte Ceramics

Saturday, 12 May 2012

I have been collecting wood from a farm for the wood kiln. this involved driving 30 minutes out to a 100 acre farm, cutting trees with the chain saw and then splitting before stacking the trailer and driving home. Three trips in the day and then further splitting and stacking the next day, I have a reasonable stack of split wood now drying beside the kiln. With autumn and the rain on the way it was good timing. The weather gets colder by the day.
The planning for the next trip to Vanuatu is well on the way, now looking at leaving on the 19th of july and returning on the 5th August. I am slowly collecting resources and am currently wanting to collect old "unlocked" mobile phones that I can take and leave with people out there. so If anyone can ask their friends and send them on to me I would be most grateful. Always trying to do that little extra bit of fundraising as well. There is the need for a solar pannel and led lights for the pottery in SW Bay so that some work can be done at night. I can get a good system in Port Vila for around $500 Australian.

Thursday, 26 April 2012

During the last six months I have been building a wood firing kiln so that I can learn about this type of firing. One of the reasons was so that I can consider a wood firing kiln for Vanuatu sometime if the funds become available. I have more or less completed the kiln and now need to collect enough dry wood for a firing and then make the pots. Should be an interesting experience. I have Steve Harrisons book on firing this type of kiln so will not entirely be in the dark.

Monday, 23 April 2012

Lapita marks the beginning of pottery traditions in Vanuatu history.1 At the opposite end of this chronological sequence are the two pottery traditions known on the western coast of Santo: namely, Wusi in the southwest and Olpoi in the northwest (Figure 16.1).2 The well-known Wusi pottery certainly highlights the contemporary Santo pottery culture. In contrast, pottery production stopped almost half a century ago in the northwest, even though people still retain the knowledge of pottery manufacturing. This paper focuses on this latter case, the current situation of the pottery-making tradition among the people of Olpoi Village, based on my field experience in Northwest Santo in 2000–2001.

I first visited the village of Olpoi briefly in 1998, and returned for a year in 2000–2001 to conduct a dissertation research. Although pottery making was not the primary focus of my research, the place of pottery in the cooking system was one of my research questions. My visit was timely because Olpoi villagers had produced about a dozen pots just prior to my arrival in August 2000. They once again made some pots in 2001, and I was able to observe and record the process. This paper thus aims to update the research of Olpoi pottery technology to the beginning of the twenty-first century. By doing so, the place of pottery among the people of Olpoi today, and the impact of interaction with researchers in conceptualising their own understanding of the pottery are reconsidered.

Pespia, Olpoi Village and pottery in Northwest Santo

The place where pottery was once in production in Northwest Santo was reported as Pespia (Speiser 1996 [1923]). Today, Pespia is known as the name of a river running south of the Olpoi Village, and Pespia as a place name refers to a number of old settlements that were located upstream of this river. Pespia River remains the major source of their livelihood, supplying extensive riverine food resources and water for irrigated taro gardens and other daily purposes. Pespia Village might have been once located approximately eight kilometres up into the mountain (Mackenzie 1995), but current villagers do not know the exact location of this old village. Instead, they generally explain that there were many small family hamlets along the river, and that people used to relocate their settlements from time to time. There are no villages or settlements along the Pespia; however, the area is owned by the people of Olpoi Village, who are the descendents of Pespia potters.

Figure 16.1. Map of Espiritu Santo

Olpoi is a Christian village formed after the establishment of the Presbyterian Mission in Nokuku in 1890. Olpoi was likely founded in the early 1920s as a new Christian settlement of about 40 people (Miller 1978: 324). This small settlement was gradually joined by the people who used to live upstream of Pespia River, and eventually became one of the major villages in the northwest. During World War Two, however, villagers returned to the interior to avoid the war. As a result, many of the elderly in the village were born, not in Olpoi, but in the inland territories. They are the people who possess the knowledge of pottery making and retain memories of using pots through their parents. Pottery was frequently used by people until relatively recently. Typically, elderly individuals are familiar with the taste of food cooked in clay pots, and often say, ‘This is what my mother used for preparing food for me.’

Figure 16.2. Schematic drawing of Olpoi-style pottery

(Yoko Nojima, c. 2000)

An old story in Olpoi recounts that pottery was brought about by a legendary man named Taval. According to the story, Taval went to his yam garden and found that a bamboo pole for supporting yam vines was swinging in the strong wind. The bamboo was tilted in all directions and created a round hole in the ground. Taval picked up this hole with curiosity, which became the shape of pottery. Variants of this story can be heard in the entire region of Northwest Santo including the Big Bay side. Interestingly, Taval is also the name of a source where people of Olpoi collect clay required for manufacturing pottery, although clay sources seem to be known in multiple locations in Northwest Santo. At Pesina on the Big Bay, for instance, there once was a known clay deposit. This source, however, is said to have been spoiled by a man contaminating the clay with sea water, and thus the pottery technology has been lost there.

Pottery in Northwest Santo is called welep, meaning ‘a saucepan of ground’. There are four major forms in Olpoi-style pottery (Figure 16.2): 1. a pot with neck and an outcurving rim (wepran); 2. a pot similar to 1., but with a narrow neck relative to the large diameter of the body (weaotot); 3. a tall, bowl-like pot with a straight rim (weanlan, wepatpat, orwepatmot depending on the decorative motifs on the rim); and 4. a shallow dish or bowl (ov). Among them, the first three are used for boiling, and are associated with the preparation of crops, cabbage and meat respectively, although the same pots are often used for any kind of food (Nojima 2010). Based on my observation, a particular fish called maj (a kind of freshwater goby) was the food most commonly cooked when pottery was used for cooking. This fish is frequently eaten in the western coast of Santo, usually boiled. When cooking this fish in pottery, sea water is used and boiled until all the water is evaporated (Figure 16.3). This cooking method, called waktos (wak=dry; tos=sea water), works better with a clay pot than with common metal pots, probably due to the different evaporation rate of water content. The preference towards the taste and texture of food cooked in pottery is recognised by the people. The major reason people do not use pottery for this cooking, they say, is a shorter cooking time and the easy handling of metal pots. Some informants in Northwest Santo mentioned that pottery was needed for cooking small portions of food, notably in relation to the grade system in which high-ranked individuals possessed their own fireplace to be separated from the others of lower status. This does make some sense because some pots found in old settlement sites in the bush are relatively small (with a maximum diameter of 15 centimetres or less), and some pottery employing the decorative motif of a boar’s tusk is described as ‘a pot for the chief’ (Figure 16.4).

Pottery has been in intermittent production for at least half a century. Villagers remember that some pots were produced sometime in early 1980s,3 although this seems to have been a one-time event. The major explanations provided by the Olpoi people for not making pottery today are twofold. First, the people’s shift from the interior to the coastal settlement distanced them from their clay sources so that it is now much harder to obtain materials for making pots. Second, it is often expressed that the current village environment is extremely dry, which is not good for making pottery. It seems most likely that the needs for clay pots have diminished to a great extent as the lifestyle of the people has been transformed as a result of Christianisation and increased Western influences. However, the availability, durability and expediency of metal pots rarely came up from the villagers as a reason for not making pottery; instead, they are the reason for not using pottery.

Figure 16.3. Maj Cooking

(Yoko Nojima, photographer, 2000)

Figure 16.4. Olpoi Pottery

(Yoko Nojima, photographer, c. 1998)

Pottery making in 2001

Ethnographic accounts in the early twentieth century attest that pottery was made only by females (Harrison 1936; Mackenzie 1995). Some elders in Northwest Santo also explained that pottery used to be made by females, while males helped them in the first step of clay preparation. Today in Olpoi, pottery is made by both men and women, although the majority of potters seems to be male. There is also an old man in a small settlement of Ravlepa to the south of Nokuku, who occasionally makes pots, because he used to observe his mother making Olpoi style pots.

The pottery making events in the years 2000 and 2001 were both organised by the Presbyterian Youth Group of the Olpoi Village, more or less as a project to learn their kastom of pottery making. Making pottery in 2001 was also a promise villagers made to me when I arrived in Olpoi in August 2000. However, when the season for pottery making came closer, the village youth became somewhat reluctant, saying that there was no time to go to the mountain to dig out clay and that they were too busy doing other work such as preparing copra. In the end, pottery making was carried out on a somewhat smaller scale than the previous year (pots were made by seven individuals, one piece each). Three of them were village elders who already had some experience making pots, and they helped others to learn how to make pots.

The basic process of pottery making remains the same as that recorded by F. Speiser, M.E. Shutler (1971), and more recently by Jean-Christophe Galipaud (1996). The following description summarises the pottery making carried out in 2001.

Preparing clay and bamboo platform

The clay is spread on a large flat board made of nakatambol wood (Dracontomelonvitiense).4 Before pounding a lump of clay, gravels contaminating the clay must be removed. Some water is added while pounding to attain ideal plasticity (Figure 16.5).

Shaping pottery

A bamboo cylinder is planted upright in front of the potter who is seated on the ground, on which clay, made into coils, is placed to form the body of the pots. Bamboo cylinders are occasionally rotated, serving as turntables for pottery making. After placing several layers of clay coils, it is smoothed and adjoined with wet fingers. Then the coiling process is repeated until the bottom half of the body of the pot is finely shaped (Figure 16.6). Then a flat disk of clay about the size of a palm is placed inside to create the bottom of the pot. The upper body of the pot is then shaped in the same manner of coiling. When making a weanlan, one or two sets of handles (anlan=ear) are attached. Handles are created by applying 3–4 short clay strings of about the length of a finger. This style is considered easier to form because of its simple vessel shape and open profile, and is often chosen by young people in their pottery-making practice.

Figure 16.5. Preparing clay

(Yoko Nojima, photographer, 2001)

Figure 16.6. Coiling the clay

(Yoko Nojima, photographer, 2001)

Decoration

It seems that the systematic decorative patterns or motifs are no longer in practice and that much knowledge regarding the decoration of pottery has vanished. While Shutler (1971) notes that Olpoi potters at the time of her visit possessed precise names for each decorative motif, I was unable to hear any explicit explanations. As a knowledge base for the decoration of pottery, the application of clay ropes and the use of fingernails, coconut midribs or citrus thorns for creating incisions are commonly shared (Figure 16.7). These are identical to the set of techniques recorded by Speiser. A motif employing a series of semi-circle clay ropes around the rim, known as patpat or ‘a boar’s tusk’, is an exceptional case of well-known pottery design.5 When decorative patterns are applied to the surface, the pottery is finally removed from the bamboo base, and its exterior bottom surface is smoothed with fingers.

Figure 16.7. Decorating the pot

(Yoko Nojima, photographer, 2001)

Applying red slip

Red clay (ta’me) is applied to the entire surface of the pot after a week of production, and pots are subsequently dried in a cool place for about a month. This process took longer than the case recorded by H. Mackenzie in which red paint is applied after two days and pots are dried for only five days (Mackenzie 1995: 69). Red clay is mixed with water inside a bamboo container, and softened fibre from a coconut husk made into an application brush is used for painting pots. When pots are dried and ready to be fired, extra red clay is scraped off and the scabrous surface of the pot is smoothed with large, disk-shaped seeds of snakerope (Entada phaseoloides) (Figure 16.8). A sharp bamboo edge recorded by Mackenzie (1995) was not used in my observation.

Figure 16.8. Smoothing the surface of the pot

(Yoko Nojima, photographer, 2001)

Figure 16.9. Placing firewood against the pots on the hearth platform

(Yoko Nojima, photographer, 2001)

Figure 16.10. Fired pots are left outside until next morning

(Yoko Nojima, photographer, 2001)

Firing pots

Firing was done at midnight (some villagers mentioned that it should be before dawn). Some stones are lined on the ground to create a hearth platform to place pots ready for firing. This hearth is first pre-heated by making a fire on top. The pot surface is rubbed with specifickastomleaves before firing. This magic ensures a successful firing without any cracks. Pots are then placed upside down on top of the pre-heated platform, and firewood is set against pots to cover them from the surroundings. Firewood for this purpose is supposed to benavenu(Macaranga), although people usedburao(Hibiscus tiliaceus) at the time of my observation. Only two to three pieces of pottery were fired at once, but a larger platform could accommodate more pots. Firing takes only about 25 minutes. Although Shutler (1971: 82) writes that ‘the pots are fired in a slow smouldering fire and left in the ashes until completely cold,’ I observed firing done with a strong, flaming fire. Fired pots are immediately removed from the fireplace with wooden tongs. Fired pots are believed to be as strong as iron, so they could be picked around without any particular attention. These pots are then left outside until the next morning, with some charcoal pieces placed inside.

There are some taboos and magic (or what villagers also callkastom) associated with pottery making. It is said to be taboo for a potter to eat salt when he/she is making a pot (Shutler 1971). This is generally taken literally and even consuming food containing salt is avoided. ‘To eat salt’ in fact is a connotation of sexual intercourse, and this is what has to be avoided before making pottery. The red colour symbolises Olpoi pottery as a product of strongkastomblessed by their ancestors. The red colour is a metaphor for the blood of ancestors. When villagers dig red clay, the names of the clan members who were deceased or killed are called, so that the blood of the dead will redden the soil. Digging sticks must be cut from a tree nameda’a(Myristica fatua), whose sap is also red. When pots are fired, they have to be left outside so that spirits of the dead will come around to decorate them with their blood.

Olpoi pottery in transition

Archaeological evidence attests that pottery was once used almost everywhere in Vanuatu until about 2000BP in the south, 1200BP in the centre, and in Northern Vanuatu the pottery tradition lasted much longer and persisted in some regions to the ethnohistoric period (Bedford 2006, Bedford and Spriggs 2008). In the past 200 years, however, Santo was the only place in which pottery was produced and documented in ethnographic records. Geographical marginality and relative isolation of the west coast of Santo would have contributed greatly to the survival of pottery technology, without being heavily entangled in the wave of post-contact cultural transformations. Accordingly, this process made pottery an item more closely and distinctively associated with the people in this region.

The production and use of pottery among the people of Santo has been recorded in major ethnohistoric and ethnographic accounts. The earliest remarks on Santo pottery come from the accounts related to the voyage of Pedro Fernandes de Quirós in 1606. Regarding the people of Big Bay, Quirós’ journal says, ‘the natives make from a black clay some very well-worked pots, large and small, as well as pots and pans and porringers in the shape of small boats’ (Markham 1904: 269). Fray Martin de Munilla also writes, ‘In this land was found something that has not been seen in any of the islands already discovered—namely many pots and pans of very good baked clay, and many wooden dishes and spoons’ (Kelly 1966: 215). These records suggest the uniqueness and richness of pottery culture throughout the island of Santo. In the early seventeenth century, pottery could have also been in use on the other islands in northern Vanuatu (Bedford and Spriggs 2008: 110–12).

During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, missionaries and ethnographers left some records on Pespia and its pottery (Mackenzie 1995; Rannie 1912). F.A. Campbell, a Presbyterian missionary who visited the area in the late nineteenth century, noted that pottery was made only in Santo (Campbell 1873). Steel (1880: 332) also left a brief remark on Santo pottery, saying ‘they make a kind of unglazed pottery, which they use for culinary purposes; but they all say that their fathers made a far superior kind.’ Acknowledging the existence of pottery in the region, it is noteworthy that a certain degree of technological limitation has already been mentioned.

Speiser was the first ethnographer to have left an in-depth documentation of pottery making in Pespia and Wusi. He records that pottery was made only in these two villages at the time of his visit, indicating the pottery production was no longer ubiquitous in the western coast of Santo. He also writes, ‘the quality of the pots has sadly deteriorated. The examples of the older production which are still to be seen are markedly superior to modern wares in general shape, in the thinness of their walls, and in the delicacy of the ornamentation’ (1996: 231–2). About 25 years later, T.H. Harrison (1936) notes that a female he saw at Pespia was the last potter. These statements point out that there was considerable transformation in pottery production during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, probably in association with increased western influence upon their lifestyle. The spread of western cooking ware might have reduced the demand for hand-made pottery, which would have also lessened its value in exchange.6 Epidemics induced through Western contact causing population decrease might also have had considerable impact in transmitting the knowledge of pottery technology.7

It was also in the early twentieth century that Santo pottery became the focus of ethnographical and anthropological research as a part of Melanesian pottery traditions (MacLachlan 1939; Schurig 1930). Since the 1950s, as archaeological investigations in the Pacific progressed with the discovery of Lapita and other traditions such as incised and applied relief potteries (Gifford and Shutler 1956) and the long-term history of pottery traditions in Melanesia became evident, ethnographic Santo pottery became the subject of researches, particularly by archaeologists. Shutler, who visited Santo in 1967, recorded pottery making in Wusi and Olpoi (Shutler 1968; 1971). While Wusi pottery technology was also recorded by Guiart (1956) in the 1950s, Shutler’s brief article (1971) is the only source from which we can learn about the state of Olpoi pottery making during this time. She notes for Olpoi pottery that ‘an admiring audience surrounds the potter and especially good pots are treasured as pieces of art,’ whereas Wusi pots were made in haste for sale (Shutler 1971: 82). This statement would indicate that pottery making was no longer a common practice at Olpoi, while at Wusi pots seem to have been produced in quantity. The time of Shutler’s visit probably marks the demise of pottery production at Olpoi, at least on an annual basis.

More recently, in the 1990s, Galipaud in association with Vanuatu Cultural and Historic Site Survey (VCHSS) did extensive surveys on surface pottery collections in the west coast, and recorded pottery making by an old man in Ravlepa (Galipaud 1996). This Ravlepa potter occasionally makes pottery as his mother who was from Olpoi used to do it. The same could be said for an old man in Olpoi who is also well-known as a potter. He principally learned how to make pottery by watching his mother making pots, rather than being trained to be a potter. Pottery making for them is a means of remembering their kastom. Some other Olpoi villagers also try making pottery from time to time most likely for similar reasons: because pottery is their kastom and an object reflecting their memories of the past.

Pottery, Olpoi people today, and us

Two ethnographically-known pottery-making villages have followed contrasting paths in the last century. The Wusi pottery tradition, despite the danger of its demise when devastating epidemics in the early twentieth century killed almost the entire Wusi population (Baker 1929), has been inherited and revived by the inland population who migrated to the coast and founded a new Wusi village (Galipaud 1996).8 Pottery is produced annually by Wusi women and sold to tourists in Luganville and Port-Vila, rather than being used for cooking by the local people. In contrast, Olpoi pottery gradually shifted to decline as its practical value in food preparation and exchange became diminished. Nevertheless, up to the present day, throughout the entire west coast, Olpoi pots are regarded as excellent cooking vessels.

The quality of pottery manufactured today is not as refined as pieces from older times. This would point to the current state of pottery technology among the Olpoi people, in which considerable knowledge has been lost. Considering that the diminishing quality of pottery was recognised almost a century ago, it is notable that the knowledge somehow endured this period of critical transformation and survived up to this century. The reason behind this would be the people’s attachment to their own kastom, culture and history, all of which are symbolically materialised in pottery. At the same time, the westerners’ admiration of their pottery and occasional visits of researchers who were interested in their pottery would have influenced the local people’s perception of pottery as an item representing their history.

It is noteworthy that pottery was made in 2000 and 2001. In 2000, Olpoi people did it principally on their own initiative, although brief visits of researchers such as Galipaud and myself in the late 1990s might have indirectly encouraged their decision making. Nonetheless, it seems that people are facing difficulties in deciding how they should handle the situation. A person in the village noted that pottery making is a very important kastom for them, but he doesn’t know how keeping this tradition would benefit their lives. Due to the geographical isolation, people often face considerable economic difficulties. The income of the people comes almost entirely from copra and cacao plantations; the produce from both can be sold only when a cargo ship passes through the west coast of Santo, a few times a year. For the Olpoi people, improving their economic situation is the most critical issue. Such economic hardship in turn is limiting their appreciation of traditional knowledge and time spent for making pottery. After 2001, pottery making in Olpoi did not continue into the following years to fully revive the practice. However, there was an unsuccessful attempt in 2007, suggesting that at least some people still possess a will to make pottery. Also, there has been some news from Ravlepa where families of the deceased old man who used to make pots have started learning and producing pottery in the past few years (Pascal, personal communication).9

Archaeologists tend to view the contemporary pottery technology overlaid on a chronological timeline relating to the prehistoric pottery sequence, and as a clue to understanding the history of the Pacific people, rather than evaluating it within a contemporary sociocultural context. Similarly, local people themselves seem to regard pots as objects that embody their history. As long as it is regarded as something of the past and distanced from their contemporary lives, it will be difficult to keep pottery alive. What is critical is to establish a solid foundation where pottery could be embedded in the lives of people in Northwest Santo. Finding a commercial route would be a way to do this—like the Wusi people are doing. It would also be possible for pottery to be developed again for culinary purposes. In any case, pottery making could be effectively used as a means of learning about kastom, as some Olpoi youth tried about a decade ago. Whether this art of pottery making will be carried through to the next generation depends on the people’s decision and efforts today. Encouragement and support from researchers and the Vanuatu Cultural Centre are certainly beneficial in this critical process, as evidenced by the success of revitalising the kastom mat production on Ambae through the Women’s Culture Project and the active involvement of researcher L. Bolton (Bolton 1994, 2003).

Left Melbourne on Wednesday 12th and
transited in Brisbane to Port Vila Vanuatu where I stayed overnight before
catching a domestic flight to Norsup in the morning.

Met up with Fremden Shadrack in Vila from TVET (Technical
Vocational Education and Training), and traveled with him. Fremden was to come
on to South West Bay to have talks and oversee the developments in this project
and is wanting to recommend Ken for training as a trainer of pottery. After
arrival in Norsup, I took a truck across the Island to Lambooboo bay and then a
boat orgainzed by Ken Naki along the coast to South West Bay. (It makes it a
long day of travel)

Quite against my expectations, this time I was met on
the beach by quite a few and given a formal welcome with flowers round the neck
and a short speech. I was also given my own hut to stay in (One that had been
built for the Peace Corps visitor who had been based there for the last two
years). The hut had been built by Ken. I was also very well looked after by the
women of the village who kept me well fed, and decorated the hut each day with
beautiful flowers. Every morning one is woken up by singing in the church at 4am
by the women of the village. Then breakfast turns up at 6am. Besides this the
roosters make sure you don’t sleep in.

While I stayed in Labo Village this trip we made quite
a few significant steps forward with this project. We mixed up a few different
clay bodies that people brought to us from the bush to trial. I was also able
to obtain some very fine black volcanic beach sand from the Southern Malakula beaches
that I had been told about on a previous trip, to mix in with the clay. This,
because Sailon Silas from Lembinwyn village paddled his canoe two hours round
the coast and then walked for four hours to get some for me.

We also used the ceramic fiber I had sent out on a
yacht from Australia and lined a forty four gallon metal drum to create a small
kiln to fire pottery in. We created a firebox from local volcanic stone using
local clay mixed with beach sand as mortar. We built this kiln base inside the
building that Ken has been making for the pottery down on the beach front. In
the week after I return home he intends to put on the thatch roof and the woven
bamboo walls, that will largely complete the building.

Over the period of my visit we made a variety of pots
including beads using a variety of techniques to further test the local clay
bodies. The pottery kick wheel that I had shipped out on a previous occasion
was also transported up outside Ken’s kitchen where we set up a base for the
duration. We did complete what I consider to be a successful first, historic
firing in Malakula, achieving 1000 degrees Celsius firing on wood. The result
being some very vitrified pots. Ken will need to continue to practice wood
firing to master the skill and achieve a high success result, however this
first firing achieved all we set out to do and more. It has certainly sparked
further interest among the locals in the possibilities of fired pottery. In
December there is a cruse ship due so here is a further incentive for Ken to
make some more pottery in preparation for that visit.

I have also managed this time, to take back to
Australia a couple of types of local clay and some of the black beach sand for
further testing. I am interested to see what will happen if I blend in some
kaolin and mix the clays in different ways.

On one occasion Ken and I walked to the local primary
school in Lawa village and talked to the local school children and teachers
showing them some of the basics of pottery and making a coil built pot for
them.

There is a local project building tourist
accommodation down by the sea and this building was continuing while I was
there. This ties in with my aims to bring a small group of potters mid next
year for workshops to help boost the local pottery skills, and provides a good
incentive for the completion of that project because this is where they intend
to put us up. There are also other bungalows being built or planned around the
bay, so the locals are clearly thinking ahead to the time when the local
airstrip is complete and people can visit more readily apart from those on
yachts who already come. While in South West Bay this time I had the
opportunity of a day in a canoe, paddling from near Lolow village to Lembinwyn
and then up to the end of the lagoon before returning tired and a little
sunburnt, but with a much better understanding of the local geography. There
are many village gardens around the lagoon on the slops of the hills. I was
very fortunate with the weather experiencing next to no rain and while it was
hot some days it was not oppressively so. There was, also almost no signs of
mosquitoes at night despite having the protection of a net, which I only used
on two occasions. Mostly there was a cool onshore breeze which made sleeping
most pleasant.

When I traveled back to Port Vila I stayed with David
Sherar, an expat Australian with a particular interest in pottery as a hobby.
He is taking part in a trade fair from the 17th of Novemberfor four
days on the water front in Vila, at which time he will be holding Raku firings
to demonstrate pottery and glazing. I helped him mix up some glazes and do a trial
firing at his home before I returned to Australia. This was most successful and
should prove to be very popular when it is demonstrated. David has invited Ken
to come and be part of these proceedings and I can only recommend highly that
Ken be assisted in attending this as he would learn a lot of valuable knowledge
from the experience as well as demonstrating the local interest in the revival
of pottery in Vanuatu. It is also an opportunity to make some glazed pottery.

While in Vila I also met Sylvester another Ni Vanuatu
man from Penticost Is. who is building a pottery Studio and actively looking
for local Vanuatu clay that he can use.

Erik who teaches art at the local Teachers college is
another man actively involved in making and selling pottery though I do not
think he is using local Vanuatu clay. I also went with David to visit Won Smal
Bag , who are interested in setting up a pottery studio in Vila that can be
accessed by any visiting Ni Vanuatu and be a place where visiting potters can
give brief workshops. Before I left I made sure I visited the Live & Learn
Office in Vila and talked with Tracy with whom I shall continue to correspond.
I showed her the fired pots from Malakula and gave her a breakdown on what we
had achieved this time, which was a significant move forward.

I am very thankful to Live & Learn for their
assistance this time in getting to SW Bay so that we can progress many aspects
of this project.

I also discovered this time that if you have 24 hours
before departure in Vila and can put this in before 3pm there is a service at
quarantine (for a small payment) to fumigate any woven mats and baskets, which
makes it much easier to take things back to Australia. They provide a
certificate to state what has been treated and with what.

Nonboi is a name in the language of people in South West Bay Malakula , Vanuatu that has not been in current use in a long time. It means pottery.

I recently travelled with my wife to this out of the way part of Vanuatu at the request of the villagers, to investigate the possibility of reintroducing something that they have long ago had a tradition for but have lost over time. They know they had it partly due to the existence of the name and also because they have been digging up small shards in their bush gardens over many years. One old retired Church elder in the village of Lolow named Masing Venivil, gave me a small piece that had surface decoration on it. I also visited the museum in Port Vila when I was passing through, and saw the collection of shards and old pots collected from around Vanuatu, which included pots from Malakula that had similar colouring to the shard I had received.

My history with this part of the world goes back over 50 years to when my father, the Reverent Nielson Whyte was a missionary in South West Bay, and I was just a small child. While my memories are not strong of this period, the stories and pictures of those times were part of my upbringing.

Just over 12 months ago I received an invitation to return and take a potters wheel (Some years ago my mother had visited and taken some of my pottery, so they knew that I was a potter).

When I got this invitation I put a lot of thought into what might be possible. I also took the time to purchase a book on the traditional pottery techniques of Papua New Guinea and did some serious reading. This is an area that, in the last few hundred years, has not had a pottery tradition, but may have traded for pottery made further north in Santo. This is also a part of Vanuatu that is seen as quite rural. It is a part of Vanuatu famous for its warlike tribes and cannibalism until the missionaries came. They also do not have electricity apart from the local high school generator that is only run from 6 to 9 at night, so an electric wheel would not be so useful. I finally decided to have a kick wheel based on the Leach potters wheel made by a local craftsman and fitted out by a local blacksmith. Towards this end I found plans of the Leach Kick wheel and also bartered some of my pots for an original J.H. Wilson made kick wheel I found in Geelong, which we used as a model to base the new wheel on. I fundraised and also received donations towards this project. This wheel was made, disassembled and then shipped out on a yacht that was sailing that way in July, along with a box of pottery books collected from Australian potters,

I travelled to Vanuatu in late July and spent 2 weeksin South West Bay, which meant flying from Port Vila to Norsup in the North of Malakula Island where we found a truck (4wheel drive ute) to take us across the Island on very rough bush tracks to Lambubu, where a boat had been sent up from South West Bay to meet us. After a three hour trip in increasingly rough wet weather we finally arrived. The next day was spent reassembling the potters wheel that had to be flat packed to go on the boat and chasing down parts that had been left at the Pastors house to complete this task. My next need was to look for clay and make pots. I asked the local villagers to bring me in samples of clay as they knew best where to find it. Due to a sudden death in the Village this process was delayed because of a traditional 5 day mourning period, and the first week also included their 30 year celebrations of Vanuatu’s Independence, so serious workshopping in clay was delayed till the second week we were there. I spent my time looking for clay and collecting black volcanic beach sand that I could mix with the clay to make it better to fire. My aim was to introduce a variety of basic techniques of making pottery, and see what other needs and possibilities there were.

I began with traditional hand-building techniques, and, had made a variety of tools suitable for this purpose based on my research into pottery making techniques of Papua New Guinea which are similar to Vanuatu.

My main aim this trip was to ascertain the viability of making pottery and, the possibility on a future visit, of making a kiln for more sophisticated wares made using local materials.

The response of the Villagers was extremely positive and they soon realised that there was economic potential in making pottery and that it could also fulfil a local need of wares to eat and drink from. I came away with a letter of support from the chiefs, church and School leaders for me to seek further funding and support to set up what can be a self sustaining local industry using only local materials that are free for the taking. Their big need is for further training and a wood-firing kiln.

My vision is to make this an ongoing project where other potters could be part of the development of a viable local pottery. I know there is a lot of interest among the pottery community in Australia in this project and I am sure there are other potters who would be interested in spending time in Vanuatu helping with this work at a later stage. Having been there for two weeks I could clearly see that there is potential for a pottery workshop in South West Bay. I am hoping they can learn to make cooking pots and other items that could be traded or sold. When tourists visit the area, this would be another source of income from pottery and they can send their product to the markets in Port Vila.

I have also over many years collected many sand drawings from Vanuatu. Some my father collected while he was a missionary there. This is a rich source of design that belongs in the area. These designs could be used as decoration on the surface of pottery. I left quite a lot of these drawing with the Pastor for the area.

Our parting farewell from Vanuatu was in the form of a 7.5 rated earthquake while we were in Port Vila, followed by over 20 aftershocks. As we were leaving in the airport there was yet another 6.4 earthquake. So our time in Vanuatu was not without some excitement.

August 2010

Vanuatu pottery project stage two. 2011

Ken Naki came from Vanuatu in early March and stayed with us for just over a month leaving on the 10th of April. His visit has resulted from my visit to South West Bay Malakula last year in late July~ early August, and was enabled by the generous support of ‘Live and Learn’ environmental education, who paid for his ticket to come. The Uniting church in Queenscliff/Point Lonsdale, who raised funds to support his studies while in Australia, also supported him.

The purpose of this visit was for someone in South West Bay to come and learn pottery from me in my studio on an intensive basis for a month. The idea being that this would provide the groundwork to begin setting up a pottery back home and begin teaching local people the skills needed to make hand made pots from locally dug clay.

Ken spent nearly a month in Port Vila getting his passport and applying for a visa to come to Australia, so in all he was away from home for over two months. This was also his very first trip outside Vanuatu, and has been full of culture shock and new experiences. (His first hot bath; new food most days; cold weather; cars and big buildings; seeing the inside of a working pottery).

In his home village of Labo, Ken is a skilled craftsman and an artist in his own right making traditional masks, as well as looking after the gardens, dogs and pigs. In his youth he spent twelve years in Port Vila making shoes, but eventually chose to return to his village to live and bring up a family.

In my studio we began by exploring various hand building techniques and he soon showed that he has a good deal of aptitude to adapt his skills to new tasks. He produced quite a few very interesting coil pots in the first week or so. We also looked at making slabs and draping these over moulds that he had carved with native designs. We also determined that he will need to begin collecting sand drawings from his part of Vanuatu because it is not culturally permissible to use designs from other areas. Basic mould making was another task we explored so that simple shapes could be easily repeated.

The clay we have been using is earthenware terracotta and white earthenware. These being the closest to what he will be able to use back in Vanuatu, though back home he will need to mix in some of the black volcanic beach sand to open out the clay body which is very fine and sticky, much like a bentonite clay. I found a sieve from the top of a water tank in a hardware for him to take back with him for this purpose.

After we had progressed through a variety of different hand building techniques we moved on to the kick wheel, which Ken found the most challenging, though he persisted, and before he left to go home, was beginning to get the idea. There is one kick wheel for him to practise on back home that was taken out last year.

One weekend we travelled to Beechworth in central Victoria to visit Ric and Judy Pierce at One Tree Hill pottery, where we learnt more useful techniques and were introduced to the clay extruder, though it may be some time before we are able to get a hand extruder out to Vanuatu, Ken was able to see the potential in the machine.

After nearly three weeks of making pots we embarked on a project to make a simple wood-firing kiln out of a 44-gallon drum lined with ceramic fibre. We got some assistance in this from Gerry, the kiln maker in Monbulk who helped cut the drum and ordered in the fibre, after which we put it all together and had a trial firing using wood. Mark Brabham, at Australian Combustion Services Melbourne, also graciously came to the rescue providing a raku burner to assist with the firing. This burner will also go to Vanuatu for use in firing kilns.

We achieved over 800 degrees C just on wood and I finished off the firing with the gas burner. I hope to be able to get up to Earthenware temperatures just on wood so will try to rebuild the base once more and try firing again sometime soon. However having the gas burner as a back up was invaluable.

Our results were surprising, as it turned out that we had over fired somewhat and well and truly melted the earthenware glazes, though not to their detriment. The results were on the whole a great success and most encouraging for the kiln design which may be a good low cost solution to building kilns in Vanuatu. They have a ready supply of 44 gallon drums and mainly need to source the fibre. After this we concentrated on decorating and glazing the rest of the work we had made over the month to fire in my large gas fired kiln. This proved to be a very good firing with great results, which came out of the kiln the day before Ken was due to return to Vanuatu. He was most impressed with the results and has returned home inspired to get on to making pottery in his village. Still he has his work cut out for him. He must start by building a pottery building and then teach some local people to help him.

His visit has inspired some Victorian potters to consider a visit next year in the winter for two weeks to hold workshops, hopefully build a kiln and of course have a holiday in a tropical paradise. I hope to be able to take back a small group of potters next year as a follow up to what has happened this year. Ken and the villagers in SW Bay will need some ongoing support for the next few years until the have reached a level of self sustainability. However, I firmly believe that this is a project that has a high potential for success. The desire to do this has come from the villagers themselves and most of the needed resources are locally available.

I would be happy to hear from any experienced potters who would consider a working holiday visit to Vanuatu next year.