Main menu

Post navigation

Nevertheless, the authors advocated a greater role of ablation in

Nevertheless, the authors advocated a greater role of ablation in the management of solitary liver metastases given that it

is less invasive and requires a shorter hospital stay. More recently, Hammill and colleagues (27) demonstrated a 5-year survival of 49% in 64 patients treated with RFA who satisfied “resection” criteria, although resectability status was determined retrospectively. In contrast, 5-year survival was only 18% in the “unresectable” group. Overall, however, despite notable exceptions, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the majority of published series support the use of HR as the primary treatment option in patients with limited disease. Perhaps the most important role for ablation is in the management of patients with advanced, unresectable disease. Although number Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of lesions is no longer a definitive criterion for unresectability in the contemporary era, many clinicians remain reluctant to offer surgery to patients

with high tumor number (9,13). Ablative techniques, either in isolation or combined with surgery may be appropriate in these cases, although reluctance to offer these treatments to patients with higher tumor number also exists. Our study demonstrates encouraging outcomes in patients Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical with ≥5 lesions JNK-IN-8 mw independent of which treatment modality was used. The median survival was not significantly different in patients who underwent HR, combined Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical HR and ablation or ablation alone at 29, 32 and 26 months, respectively. Similar trends have been observed elsewhere. Rivoire and colleagues (17)

analyzed the outcomes of 57 patients treated with HR or combined HR and cryoablation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There were no major differences between the two groups and 4-year survival was similar for both Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical HR and combined HR and ablation at 37% and 36%, respectively. Interestingly, however, 59% of patients who underwent the combined procedure had ≥5 tumors compared to 27% in the HR resection group. In this regard, concomitant HR and ablation was shown to not only achieve comparable outcomes to HR alone but effectively expand the criteria for resectability. An earlier series by Wallace and colleagues (31) evaluated the outcomes of 77 patients of which 47 underwent cryoablation. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology The authors showed that ablation was associated with a similar 3-year survival to HR (37% vs. 36%) and specifically allowed the surgical treatment of patients previously deemed unresectable because of number of lesions. The authors concluded that incorporating cryoablation into the armamentarium for the treatment of advanced CLM extends the indication for resection and improves outcomes. Our findings are consistent with these findings. However, it must be pointed out that for ≥5 lesions, ablation with or without a resection had a higher overall and liver specific recurrence rates.