Men are generally more reluctant to try vegetarian products and a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research says that is influenced by a strong association of meat with masculinity."We examined whether people in Western cultures have a metaphoric link between meat and men" write the authors. And they concluded there was a strong cultural connection to meat - especially muscle meat, like steak.

Evolutionary psychologists would likely disagree, as do unbiased dietary scientists.In a number of experiments that looked at metaphors and certain foods, like meat and milk, the authors found that people rated meat as more masculine than vegetables. They also found that meat generated more masculine words when people discussed it, and that people viewed male meat eaters as being more masculine than non-meat eaters. Most of the studies took place in the United States and Britain, but the authors also analyzed 23 languages that use gendered pronouns. They discovered that across most languages, meat was related to the male gender."To the strong, traditional, macho, bicep-flexing, All-American male, red meat is a strong, traditional, macho, bicep-flexing, All-American food," the authors write. "Soy is not. To eat it, they would have to give up a food they saw as strong and powerful like themselves for a food they saw as weak and wimpy."

No loaded, emotional verbage in that quote, right? Soy is also associated with harmful hormonal changes in men, so it may be that males simply understand that is a not a good thing.If vegetarian marketing and advocacy groups want to counteract associations like meat and masculinity, they need to address the metaphors that shape consumer attitudes, the authors explain. For example, an education campaign that urges people to eat more soy or vegetables would be a tough sell, but reshaping soy burgers to make them resemble beef or giving them grill marks might help cautious men make the transition.

Veggie Burgers actually taste pretty good and they look a lot like hamburgers, they are just dry. The authors may not have been in a grocery store in the last 20 years so they don't know vegetable burgers already have the qualities they are recommending in 2012."In marketing, understanding the metaphor a consumer might have for a brand could move the art of positioning toward more of a science," the authors conclude.

Comments

In Steven Pinker's recent book, "The Better Angels of Our Nature", there is an interesting section on the history of vegetarianism. Some of his main points (my two cents in brackets):

(1) Historically, what on the surface seemed like a compassion for animals was often an expression of the observer's sensibilities. ( I'm certainly guilty of that at times.)(2) Prior to the 1840's, a diet abstaining from meat and fish was the "Pythagorean diet". The Pythagoreans were a cult that believed souls moved into humans if they ate animals.(3) Nazis, who had animal protection laws and whose leader practiced vegetarianism, put a dent in the idea that abstaining from eating meat makes one more compassionate. (The myth lived on in a Star Trek episode when Spock turned aggressive after steering away from his vegetarian diet.)(4) Vegetarianism has been boosted in recent decades because it's supposedly healthier and better for the environment. (In cases like gout, excess meat consumption is a definite risk factor. Red meat increases colon cancer risk by about 20%, but with many other claims, the evidence is hazy.)

Of course, returning to the article, what helps shatter the "must have meat to build muscle" myth is that star athletes like Martina Navratilova, Prince Fielder, the "Chief" (Parrish of the Celtics), and wide receiver Tony Gonzalez don't eat red meat.

This is what the Harvard Family Medical Guide recommends:

You don’t have to give up red meat to be healthy, but the evidence suggests that you’d be wise to limit your consumption. Two 4-ounce portions a week should be safe; even then, choose lean cuts, trim away excess fat, and avoid charring your meat on a grill. Limit processed, cured, and salted meats as much as possible.

Most of these macho men will have to learn about Erectile Dysfunction (watch the national evening news ads to see just how prevalent the condition is). There is a direct correlation to consumption of animal products and diseases of the circulatory system, which includes heart disease and stroke!

Your correlation-causation arrows are all messed up. Per capita American male consumption of animal products are far lower than in the past and erectile dysfunction is up. What has increased in a curve with erectile dysfunction are (a) marketing campaigns and availability of drugs to cure a problem men did not know they had, it was considered 'natural' in the past and (b) the estrogen influences of more soy being consumed by men.

Sorry, but ED is a lifelong disease process and closely associated with a Western diet. Autopsies of almost all American soldiers during the Korean War should visible signs of atherosclerosis (what causes ED) in men in the prime of life. None of the North Korean soybean eaters showed this condition.

Erectile dysfunction- Will erectile dysfunction reverse with plant based nutrition?
We have seen erectile dysfunction reverse on multiple occasions. Those who follow the program most closely have the best results. How long it takes varies.http://www.heartattackproof.com/qanda.htm

hank, political or ideological metaphors (which under-gird most marketing and advertising efforts) do not subscribe to the laws of scientific causality (even though, yes, you are right in that correlation, time-order, and non.spuriousness are its precepts). language does not work in that way ;-)