Moreover accurate and perfect knowledge with no
fallacies and errors, hell bigger than god’s: Omniscience in all its majesty.

One would say ok what will you do with it?

Nothing! Just baste and bathe in it! Know with a capital K.

Obviously, as well explained by Rod Serling or
Charles Beaumont rather,

this kind of knowledge should never ever be
passed down to other humans.

Would it help me? Would it serve me well?

More than likely it would destroy me completely
but the Icarian ascension would be the rush of all times though.

Epistemologically we are still retards in so many
ways.

The best minds are only bought by beasts.

We are suffocated by financial need and political greed.

We all travel in the dark, more than likely
statistically as blind and stupid as our ancestors

who also thought they were
la crème de la crème: the ultimate in all scientific knowledge.

We were and are so far advanced in lobotomy
and the many ways of putting an animal or a human to death, smart weapons and
all.

Still one can only dream. Every time I read anything in this age of Wikipedia
I sigh wishing I was younger, smarter, different, more disciplined, more this
and more that and less me.

I have always been extremely curious but I was
raised in the wrong environment with a stack of emotional and mental baggage
that made sure I would never be good for anything.

I think Flowers for Algernon did to me what LSD
did to Syd Barrett: fucked me up forever! J

“If the operashun werks
good Ill show that mouse I can be as smart as.”

(on a side note, it hasn't helped the biggest minds of this planet at all mind you, maybe because exactly that their knowledge was far from being perfect)

Can one have Knowledge that passeth all understanding AND

Peace that passeth all understanding at the same time?

Or is one asking too much?

I saw a beggar leaning on his wooden crutch, he said to me, "You must not ask for so much." And a pretty woman leaning in her darkened door, she cried to me, "Hey, why not ask for more?"

~Leonard Cohen

Edward O. Wilson, referring toants, once said that "Karl Marxwas right,socialismworks, it
is just that he had the wrong species",[28]meaning
that while ants and othereusocialspecies
appear to live incommunist-like societies, they only do so because they are
forced to do so from their basic biology, as they lack reproductive
independence: worker ants, being sterile, need their ant-queen in order to
survive as a colony and a species, and individual ants cannot reproduce without
a queen and are thus forced to live in centralised societies. Humans, however,
do possess reproductive independence so they can give birth to offspring
without the need of a "queen", and in fact humans enjoy their maximum
level of Darwinian fitness only when they look after themselves and their
offspring, while finding innovative ways to use the societies they live in for
their own benefit.