Scan the news on any given day in America, and you will invariably find multiple stories about race, racism, ethnicity, and race relations. We can’t seem to get enough of this topic, and correspondingly, the media appetite for all things race-related is unquenchable.

Racism is one of the more tragic features of the human condition. Like greed, envy, and other sins, it has been around for thousands of years, on every continent.

So here we are, in the most advanced, successful, and powerful nation in the history of the world, and yet we continue to struggle to get past the color of each other’s skin.

There is no more shallow, hollow, or soulless way to think about human beings than in terms of their skin color. It is completely inane. Under what logic would any intelligent, logical, or decent person give any thought to the pigmentation of a person’s epidermis? It’s nothing short of immoral, not to mention stupid (oops…there’s that word again).

On the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech in August 1963, many are asking the question: Are we in a better place today when it comes to race relations?

Yes and no. On the yes side, consider the following:

My parents immigrated to the United States from India a few years after Dr. King was assassinated. They came looking for an equal opportunity, and they got it, in the Deep South, in Baton Rouge, La. My parents wanted only to be judged based on the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

In 2003, I decided to run for governor of Louisiana, a state where David Duke got 44 percent of the statewide vote in 1990. The pundits said I was insane to even try. Friends worried about my mental stability and begged me not to run. I narrowly lost that first race, but I’ve won every race since then. {snip}

Here’s what I’ve found in Louisiana: The voters want to know what you believe, what you stand for, and what you plan to do, not what shade your skin is. And I think that’s true of the country as a whole: America’s younger generation pays less attention to skin color than the generations that preceded them. {snip}

When I look at America, I see a country that increasingly has lost its way in terms of morality. As a Christian, as I look at American culture over the past half century, I don’t like a lot of what I see. Divorce is through the roof, pornography is everywhere, sexual predators are on the loose and on the Internet, our abortion rate is higher than almost every First World country, vulgarity and profanity are mainstream and commonplace. In general, our culture has become coarser, and I regret that.

I do believe however, that while racism still rears its ugly head from time to time, America has made significant progress in the half century since Dr. King’s incredible speech.

But not all the news is good. In another respect, we have taken some steps backward. We all remember learning in grade school about America as the great “melting pot”—a concept that was completely compatible with Dr. King’s dream of every American being judged on the content of his character and not the color of his skin. You come to the United States and you become an American, regardless of your heritage, your ethnicity, your traditions, or your accent. But now we seem to act as if that melting pot is passé, an antiquated notion.

{snip}

Yet we still place far too much emphasis on our “separateness,” our heritage, ethnic background, skin color, etc. We live in the age of hyphenated Americans: Asian-Americans, Italian-Americans, African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Cuban-Americans, Indian-Americans, and Native Americans, to name just a few.

Here’s an idea: How about just “Americans?” That has a nice ring to it, if you ask me. Placing undue emphasis on our “separateness” is a step backward. Bring back the melting pot.

{snip}

We are all created in the image of God—skinny, fat, tall, short, dark, light, whatever. Who cares? What does it matter? It’s time to get over it. It’s time for the end of race in America. Now that would be progress.

Share This

We welcome comments that add information or perspective, and we encourage polite debate. If you log in with a social media account, your comment should appear immediately. If you prefer to remain anonymous, you may comment as a guest, using a name and an e-mail address of convenience. Your comment will be moderated.

Puggg

If Jindal runs for President, he’ll be touting his Indian-ness during his campaign. Or if he doesn’t, he’ll have his people do it for him all the while not doing it himself.

ThomasER916

Yep. Jindal will find race the moment it wins elections. And blacks are so stupid they’ll think he’s black.

Freedom Hayak

I don’t think they will. Blacks have animosity toward anyone who is not them and they can tell the difference.

ThomasER916

Any proof?

Just once could a Ronulan to give any proof for anything?

Blacks think that Gandhi was black and Cleopatra was black. Blacks believe that Shakespeare was black and Jesus was black. Blacks believe that Socrates was black and Hannibal was black. Blacks believe they built Stonehenge. This is all documented in Afrocentrist college courses, textbooks, and magazines.

I grew up on the South Side of Chicago. I’ve seen it all in schools, in the news, and on the streets. I dated an Irish immigrant named Fiona. Blacks thought she was part black because her name “sounded African.”

dukem1

Well why not? Doesn’t every candidate for anything grasp at any advantage he may have? What’s wrong with being ambitious?
At the the risk of offending all my fellow Am-reners, I like Jindal.
He “gets” what being an American is all about.
Every SOB is just as good as the next SOB.
I don’t really know how good of a Gov. he’s been in LA. ‘Tho I suspect the bar is pretty low down there.
But I would suggest to all here that we must realize that, like it or not, our nation is a melting pot, or a mosaic, or, pick your metaphor…Everyone’s here, and they ain’t goin’ nowhere.
I’m not sayin’ Jindal should be president….just that he’s a smart guy, accomplished, and should not be written off just because of the color of his skin.
In the political arena, we should pick our friends carefully and wisely.
It ain’t a job for sissies,

Sick of it

He hasn’t been doing a good job as governor. His ramblings in this article are rather hypocritical, considering his stint to date. Also – If he’s so post-racial, why does he have an Indian wife? It’s not like Louisiana is filled with people from India. Oops, it may have something to do with his own personal racial beliefs.

dukem1

I’m not gonna argue, ‘tho if he had a white wife, I think some people here would dislike him even more…Maybe he’s like us, and wants his children and grandkids to look like him, rather than a Sharpton or Kardashian.

Sick of it

My point is that, just like his native people in India, he believes in sticking with his own. But he’s trying to lecture us on thinking about race? He’s a hypocrite on a multitude of levels.

NeanderthalDNA

“It’s time to get over it. It’s time for the end of race in America. Now that would be progress.”

So we can look forward to a dismantling of affirmative action under a Jindal administration?

Amen. Do not trust South Asians. They will pull the “I’m kind of white with a darker complexion” play when it suits them, but then they’ll turn around and play the “person of color” card when it suits them. The U.S. did not do too badly when it comes to Indian immigrants, but that was largely because Indian affirmative action analogs denied smart Indian people opportunities because of their caste, so they set out for America under the post-1965 dispensation. (Under the pre-1954 dispensation, they would never have been allowed to become citizens, although I think Piyush (a/k/a Bobby) was actually born here, and might be considered a citizen under the Wong Kim Ark precedent.) They’re smart, crafty people with a strong group identity who will play both sides of the street to advance their interests. As with Jews, there is a substantial discrepancy between their interests and those of the American people as a whole.

WmarkW

How about we start emphasizing how everyone will be judged by the content of their character, and no one gets a bye for the color of their skin.

Dads of ten kids by seven mothers; flash mobs that overrun stores and neighborhoods; and most of all criminals that beat or kill innocents. I dream we start judging everyone by the standards of how well they uphold civilized society.

dd121

I start with the skin then work my way up to content.

Luca

The problem has never been about the amount of melanin in the skin.

It’s always been about the amount of violence, ignorance, crime, illegitimacy, whining, dependency and laziness in the character.

So CAL Snowman

It’s not the skin color we dislike it’s everything else that is not skin that gives us pause.

MerlinV

The only difference is skin color. Race has no meaning according to Jindal. Carefully examine these photos then decide:

MerlinV

Jindal is correct. I can discover no difference.

Winston Merryweather

That is not a fair comparison. The woman in the top photo has makeup on.

Athling

As noted by Vonhauer, the photos you posted did more to emphasize the reality of race than any other comment and was promptly deleted by some moderator.

There was nothing unusual about the photo as anyone who has traveled in Africa can attest. Why the photo was deleted when other photos are not is ridiculous.

Thank you for the post MerlinV.

Vonhauer

Perhaps Ian Jobling has returned to AmRen?

Guest

The African Mursi tribe all look like this typical Mursi woman:

MerlinV

My only guess is that the mod is a troll who cant handle a good dose of reality. There wasnt a damn thing wrong with that photo yet the wimp was somehow offended by it. Nobody else was.

MerlinV

A typical Mursi woman:

HJ11

I repectfully disagree in the sense that we must not accept the premise that skin color (and, thus, skin) is not important. Our skin is our largest organ and White skin is essential to us as Whites for a number of reasons, including the fact that it allows us to make more Vitamin D than those with darker skins,and there’s much more that could be added, but this would then be too long a comment.

White skin is essential to us and our identity. It is not a trifle.

Stay White.

HJ11

Jindal is a pencil necked geek. No, seriously, he is. Did you see him when he was the GOP’s latest non-White in the window on TV when he gave a GOP response speech a couple of years ago? I expected him to bite the head off a chicken.

His views on race are as crazy as he is crazy looking.

Jefferson

I would rather deal with dark skin people who are pencil neck geeks, than deal with dark skin people who beat to death a White World War 2 veteran and shoot to death a White Australian because they were both.

I would not lump Bobby Jindal in the same category as Bantu thugs who Chimp Out at White people because they hate Whites.

IstvanIN

You are, of course, right, however he doesn’t belong here.

Jefferson

Bobby Jindal is the least of White America’s worries.

IstvanIN

We need to be shed of all of them.

HJ11

Yes, but it’s not a matter of either/or. He’s not White. Period. He is not my kind. He will never be my kind. I don’t care what any non-Whites do or think so long as they don’t affect my kind.

Jefferson

I didn’t say Bobby Jindal is White, because he is obviously not. I am just saying he is not a threat to White America. Now Eric My People Holder, he is a real threat to White America. And he is in a position of power to make White America’s lives a living hell. Eric Holder is constantly violating the civil rights of White Americans.

HJ11

Yes, but this column is about Jindal, not Holder. And, actually, any White in a White land is a threat to Whites because they carry non-White genes that can infect our gene pool.

Sick of it

He’s more dangerous because he does not appear to be dangerous. The not-eskimos should have made that abundantly clear to us by now.

Freedoooom

I am judging them by the content of their character.

[Guest]

>>>On the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech…

Shut up, Bobby.

Thor Bonham

As if that speech was anything but sniveling .. Give it a rest, some of us can see through things that others have a hard time doing ..

[Guest]

Yeah, I’ve heard more than enough about that person and that speech.

To the likes of Piyush “Bobby” Jindal, though, that person is a saint if not a god, and his words (assuming they weren’t plagiarized) are holy writ.

Enough!

ms_anthro

Gosh, why would a non-White child of immigrants want Americans to stop focusing on race when it comes to the future of the country their White ancestors built for them? It makes no sense.

exLibtard

There is no more shallow, hollow, or soulless way to think about human beings than in terms of their skin color. It is completely inane. Under what logic would any intelligent, logical, or decent person give any thought to the pigmentation of a person’s epidermis?

Spoken like a true liberal. As if any significant number of people believe that race is skin color.

Here’s what I’ve found in Louisiana: The voters want to know what you believe, what you stand for, and what you plan to do, not what shade your skin is. And I think that’s true of the country as a whole: America’s younger generation pays less attention to skin color than the generations that preceded them.

Keep telling yourself that. Our youth are probably more racially conscious than their parents. Their peer group is the most diverse of any age cohort. They see the reality of race more frequently than their parents ever did.

I do believe however, that while racism still rears its ugly head from time to time, America has made significant progress in the half century since Dr. King’s incredible speech.

That’s right, Bobby. Pay homage to the black Marxist MLK. Lick his boots if it makes you feel good.

Yet we still place far too much emphasis on our “separateness,” our heritage, ethnic background, skin color, etc. We live in the age of hyphenated Americans: Asian-Americans, Italian-Americans, African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Cuban-Americans, Indian-Americans, and Native Americans, to name just a few.

No, really? I thought opening the flood gates to the third world wouldn’t result in a dissolution of our generic American ethnic identity. Jindal has discovered that non-White, non-Western people can’t seamlessly dissolve into the White American ethnic melting pot.

No wonder the GOP is called the Party of Stupid.

WhitePiney

I can’t speak for everyone else but I’m not judging people by the color of their skin an albino African is still an African.

Romulus

See my comment above. I’ve actually seen one.

Spartacus

Africans don’t call their albinos “African”. They call them “lunch” .

anton drexler

It just goes to show you that you can go to Brown, Harvard, Yale, and be a Rhodes scholar (I’m sorry, I mean a Mugabe scholar, Cecil Rhodes was a racist!) and still be a complete idiot. An education like Jindal’s makes its recipients essentially blind to reality, since it’s essentially ideology, not education, such august institutions are peddling to the privileged and plutocratic. .

Actually it isn’t true that we are all created in the image of God. If that were true than how come only Jacob/Israel and his descendants are the only ones that have the covenant with God. In fact, according to the Bible, Jesus Christ only came for the Lost sheep of Israel, not all races. Adam is the father of the white race, no other. Adam in the Hebrew literally means to be ruddy, to show blood in the face, to blush. Only white people blush. No other race has been created in God’s image.

But it’s true. Jesus Christ stated in Matthew 15:24, “I only came for the lost sheep of Israel.” Only the Adamites sinned not all races. Jesus Christ could only correct the sin made by his people Adam through the line of Israel which isn’t the Jews, but the white race.

NordicHeritage

But jesus also said to go into all the world preaching the gospel to all creation mark 16:15. Paul states in Galatians 3:26-29 You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. You can’t get around the fact that Christianity is a universal religion that teaches no distinctions between the races. And the old testament doesn’t apply here because we all know that as christians you live under grace not the law as paul said in gal 3:25.

Which ending of Mark 16 are you using. There are only at least 3 of them. Mark’s Gospel from Mark 16:9 – 16:20 were added about 300 years after Mark’s Gospel was written. So which one are you using.

No Christianity is not a universal religion. Christianity is for one race and one race only. This is why it is so difficult to preach Christianity to all races. If what you are saying is true, than please tell me. How come missionaries to the American Indians had to bribe the Indians to go to church? and How come the Indians on the east coast seem to accept the Gospel so readily. Evangelist David Brainard was one of the most successful preachers in colonial times. He was just short of his 30th. birthday when he died, and yet he preached the Gospel to the Indians of New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts. Still he was very successful, so successful that missionaries even today take his journal out on the Missionary field to find out how he did it. So how was Brainard so successful. Very simple. He was evangelizing white Indians. That is right. According to new research at least 25% of the American Indians today are direct descendants of white Europeans, and they were the first Indians. White Europeans arrived on the North American continent 6,000 years before the Alaska ice sheet melted to allow the Asians to come across. A classic example of white Indians are Mandan, Iroquoix, Shawnee, Cherokee, Cheyenne, and so forth. Again Jesus Christ only came for the lost sheep of Israel. You can only belong to Christ if you are an Israelite. All of your quotes are for Israel, no other race.

The Bible teaches the distinction between the races. The Bible does not mention any other race except in passing. Everything about the Bible is about the white race only. from Adam (to show blood in the face, to be ruddy, to blush), to Noah (perfect in his generation. In his genome.In other words he was pure blooded, A direct descendant of Adam). to Shem (his oldest son), to Eber (the colonizer), the Abraham (son of the colonizer. Hebrew), to Isaac (A perpetual and everlasting covenant God Yahweh gave to Isaac), to Jacob (name changed to Israel. which means, he or they that walk with God Yahweh), Down through Jesus Christ. Were there any blacks, orientals, and Hispanics in Christ’s genealogy, No there weren’t. Why not? because Christ was pure blooded, a direct descendant of Jacob/Israel, Isaac,Abraham, Shem, Noah, and Adam. he was pure blooded and he had to be. The law has never been done a way with and Paul even says so. How come none of the first century Christians ever evangelized any other race but white?? Show me where they did. The Bible says that God’s spirit is go throughout the world looking for his own. He is looking for Israelties, not all races, Because Jesus Christ only came for the lost sheep of Israel. Only the off spring of Jacob Israel are the lost sheep of Israel. if what you are saying is true,than how come God Yahweh condemns interracial marriage then? he couldn’t do that if he accepted all races into his kingdom now could he.

David Ashton

He meant the sheep of Israel who were “lost” spiritually, not the Ten Tribes as such.

Really, you believe that?? Sorry to bust your bubble, but that isn’t what the Bible says that is what the Jews have been telling you. If what you are saying is true than who is Israel. All races I suppose, right. Israel is what Jacobs name was changed to. it means those that walk with God. Now explain something to me. If what you are saying is true than how come Abraham wanted God to give the covenant to Ishmael. After all Ishmael is the father of the Arabs and God tells Abraham so. Yet, God tells Abraham that he will make a covenant with Isaac and nobody else. It was to be a perpetual covenant, a covenant without end. Does that mean all races? Ah No. Was Adam the father of all races. Now that is interesting when you consider that Adam literally means to blush, to be ruddy, to show blood in the face red. To blacks blush? Ah no. how about Hispanics or Asians. Ah no? who blushes than, white people. Now that brings up another interesting point, The Bible says that God breathed into Adam and Adam became a living soul. So the Hebrew (Gaelic) states that Adam was a white man (to be ruddy, to blush) and he became a living soul. Is this true of blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and so forth. Ah no. How can they be lost spiritually when only Adam (the white man) was given the spirit of God. Does God deal with any other race in the Bible but the white race? No. God does tell his people Israel to separate themselves from other races. So explain this to me? If Adam and Eve were the only people in the Garden that sinned and they were white, which the Bible says they were, than how can any other race be lost spiritually. Only Adam and Eve (or at least Adam) were created spiritually. Was ish used when Adam procreated. NO. the 5th chapter of Genesis states that Adam begat sons and daughters. Only one time is the Hebrew word ish used and that is the beginning of the 4th. chapter.Where Eve states that she has got a man child from God. Why wasn’t Adam used. Because Adam did not sire Cain. A fallen angel did. The book of Enoch even names that angel. the angel was Gadrel. When God deals with nations Adam is used. The Bible is about one race and one race only. No other races are even mention except in passing. In fact it was race mixing that always got Israel in trouble. So please tell me. If Israel is Jacobs seed line, how can other races join in. Especially when God Yahweh condemns interracial marriage. Noah was pure blooded (he was perfect in his generation, genes, bloodline), King David was ruddy (he was white), Jesus Christ was pure blooded. The accounts of both of his ancestries are white. Do you see a black, or an Asian there nobody. I know, your going to say what about Ruth the Moabite. When guess what, Ruth was an Israelite. Basically what I’m saying is that Jesus Christ was pure blooded. Something that the Jews hate because they want to mix everybody up and destroy God’s people Israel. Sorry, but it doesn’t mean Israel spiritually. If it did, than all the other races would have to be Israel and they aren’t.

David Ashton

The comment deleted was largely an incorrigible repetition of what “isaiah 14” has said already, including the “actual name” (mispelled, of course) of the wicked angel he claims was real father of Abel’s blood-brother Cain (Genesis 4). Ezra and Nehemiah used the terms Jews and Israel for the same people. These were largely the same folk among whom Jesus later deliberately preached. When he sent his disciples to the “lost sheep” (Matthew 10.6) they did not go immediately abroad to find the missing tribes but operated among the local population, clearly confirming that the adjective “lost” referred to sinfulness, not physical disappearance to Wales or Iceland.

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Did god want sin or is he a failure? Free will does not explain away the lack of moral sense that a sociopath represents. Did god want children molested or did he fail when he creates some men to have a sexual attraction to little children? Does god value the free will of the child molester over that of their innocent victims? If we are made in god’s image, then god is a morally bankrupt failure for you can’t just deny all the bad god has created and only look at the good. Looking at the world around me, why should I ever think an eternal god can do better in some other world then he has done in this one?

Your failure is not knowing God Yahweh and what he is trying to do. You forget that Satan is the god of this world and that sin was found in him. God Yahweh is not a failure, Satan is. When Satan fell and released sin into the world that is when God Yahweh had to establish his own people in order to counter the evil that Satan unleashed. You cannot blame God Yahweh for what is happening in the world. You must remember that Satan has his own children in the world. Most church’s don’t want to believe this because they preach the universal man. That is far from the truth. God Yahweh has a specific people in the world today. They are Israelites. The Jews are masquerading as Israelites when in fact they are the seed line of Satan. They are doing their fathers will. Even Harold Wallace Rosenthal, the Jewish adviser to the Jewish Senator Jacob Javits, stated so in an interview in 1976. He stated that the Jews are God’s chosen people, but what most people don’t realize is that the god of the Jews is Lucifer (Satan). The problem is DNA. God Yahweh ordered his people Israel to destroy the other races because of their debauchery. Moses,Joshuah, King David and others did a good job. However, Many Israelite Kings were to influenced by greed and by the Edomite, and Canaanite Jew. Such as Saul and Ahab. God Yahweh has to finish the job himself. That is what he is doing. The parasites (Jews) are starting to be revealed, and they will be dealt with very harshly.

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

And you obviously forget that Satan was created by your god who apparently chooses to keep him around since you believe Satan exists. What could possibly be more immoral then to create a torture facility called hell, designed to torture the imperfect objects of your own creation? Your creator god, were he to exist, would be the epitome of evil. The only thing lower than a devil worshiper is one who worships the one who created the devil and keeps him around.

By the way, you dodged every one of my questions – like a typical dishonest theist protecting his cherished delusion.

You are so misinformed. I can understand why you spue so much hate for God Yahweh’s people NO, God Yahweh did not create Satan. God created the angels and Satan was one of them, but Satan created himself. Every individual has his own ability to accept or reject God Yahweh’s plan. Satan, when he was known as Lucifer, refused to accept God Yahweh’s plan. Satan began a rebellion amongst the angels and he took a third of them down with him. You are so misinformed. What does hell mean?? It is the transliteration of the Greek word Hades which is synonymous with the Hebrew (Gaelic) word Sheol. Sheol literally means,”the place of the dead, or where the dead abide in.” There is nothing fiery about Hell. It is the place where the departed stay until the judgement day. After the crucifixion Jesus Christ went to hell and preached to the people there. When he rose from the dead he took the people that he preached to with him. The Bible says that the graves were opened and those that were dead came a live and visited relatives. OK what questions do you have, since you never asked any questions. Psalm 14:1 and 53:1 states, “The fool says in hims heart that there is no God Yahweh.” So ask me your questions so I can further destroy your doctrine.

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Bla bla bla, I could go on about Mother Goose like you do about your fictional god too. You reason like a well trained theist. In one sentence you write god did not create Satan and then in the next “God created the angels and Satan was one of them”. You can’t have your cake and eat it too pal. Your version of a creator god means god is the root of all sin. Don’t argue with me, argue with your own dogma.
Then you lie and claim I did not ask any questions. You will stoop to anything to protect your cherished delusion won’t you death denier?
It’s not about god and it never was. It’s about you being too afraid to face your own mortality honestly, like an adult.

No God Yahweh created Lucifer, not Satan. Satan means adversary, and God Yahweh changed Lucifer’s name to Satan. Lucifer was created perfect with free will. He had the ability to choose right or wrong good or evil. He chose wrong and evil. Sorry to destroy your idea again. No God Yahweh did not create Satan; Lucifer did, by his rebellion, and God Yahweh changed his name to fit Lucifer’s rebellious character. I guess you don’t know how to read. It was because of Lucifer’s rebellion that God changed his name to Satan. Lucifer like Adam and Eve had a freedom of choice. God Yahweh created him as a free thinker. He chose evil. OK what are your questions??? You seem to be full of them. There is an eternity waiting for you, it is but a breath a way, you don’t want to blow it.

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Having the ability to choose good or evil is not the issue, your moral IQ is and if your failure of a god didn’t create people with a low moral IQ, there would be no sin because they would choose good over evil so again, your god is the root of all sin, not his imperfect creations.
There is an eternity awaiting you too, eternal death. All you prove is that fear drives your faith.
So what other creatures do you believe in blindly with no proof? Leprechauns? Bigfoot? You theists are all hypocrites living in la la land because you’re too scared to face your own mortality honestly like adults.

Why do you hate God Yahweh so much. God Yahweh did not create sin. Sin was created in the heart of Lucifer and God Yahweh changed his name to Satan. You must be black right. Well if you are, your IQ isn’t very high. Why would God Yahweh be the root of evil?? He doesn’t produce evil your god Satan (Lucifer) does. Fear doesn’t drive my faith. That doesn’t even make any sense. The opposite of faith is fear. So in other words your saying fear drives fear. What does that mean”. God Yahweh made a covenant with Isaac and his seed line. That covenant is perpetual everlasting. The Jews want to have that covenant, but they can’t. They have been waging war against true Israel for 3,000 years, and they are losing. My thesis is Scripturally based. You don’t have a defense so you have to use slander. I have eternal life. I offer it to you. Only you have to stop your bitching against God Yahweh and bring him into your life.

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Why do you lie so much? Hating your fictional god would be like hating Mother Goose. Though I do admit that I have contempt for you dishonest fools who go around claiming there is a god. You are no different from some fool insisting there are aliens on Pluto so if anybody here has a low IQ it is you. Blind ignorant faith is no virtue, it’s the lack of it. There is no knowledge of any gods and that is a fact, so you can stop lying now you clown.

“It is an established maxim and moral that he who makes an assertion without knowing whether it is true or false is guilty of falsehood, and the accidental truth of the assertion does not justify or excuse him.”
— Abraham Lincoln

I don’t lie, and I am not dishonest. I guess you don’t believe in what Abraham Lincoln. I am an Israelite, I know Jesus Christ. You will stand before Jesus Christ to give an account of your life. Eternity is but a breath a way, and you don’t want to blow it. I am different simply because I know the truth and I am ready for eternity. What you need to do is stop being foolish and to start knowing the truth. I have told you the truth, now it is up to you. Remember, “The fool says in his heart that there is no God Yahweh.” Psalm 14:1 and 53:1

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Since when can a corpse stand before anything? You are a delusional dishonest death denier, nothing more. You can’t even comprehend the word truth you are so out of touch with reality.

Well you might have a point there. Only white people have spirits,the other races have souls. However, the Bible does say that there is going to be a judgement day and that God Yahweh will separate the sheep from the goats. The truth is that every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is lord (Yahweh). You can have a blessing, but you can’t have the covenant.

David Ashton

Why “must” someone who disagrees with you be “black”? And if so, why do you offer him/her “eternal life”. Your mind seems out of control and yet you quite happily insult other people.

No they are the same. Hebrew is a people. It means sons or daughters of the colonizers. The people called Hebrew spoke Gaelic. Welch and Icelandic are the two languages that are the original languages of the Old Testament and icelandic is unchanged for 2,500 years. If you were to take Gaelic and Hebrew and put them side by side, they would be the same.It is the Jews that confused the issue because they want Christians to believe that they are Israelites and that Hebrew is their language. They did this so people would think that they are Hebrew when in reality they are hybrids. They are Edomites, Canaanites, and Khazars. 95% of the Jews in Israel today never originated from there. The largest group of Jews are Ashkenazi. They are from Noah’s middle son Jephtha. Noah’s middle son and his descendants moved east and south east into China. The white mummies that were found in northern to central China are probably their ancestors. They were originally of the white race. the Sephardic Jews are the Spanish Jews. They are Edomites from mount Seir. The Jews do not speak Hebrew (Gaelic) they speak yiddish. A corrupted German dialect.

David Ashton

If you cannot do this personally, with a sample such as (say) Deuteronomy 23.1-11, would you kindly refer me to a source that provides parallel passages (say a dozen verses) from the Old Testament Hebrew alongside their Icelandic and Welsh equivalents for comparison?

Why don’t you do some research. I guess you don’t know how the Jews operate. They hide everything, and it is difficult to find the information. I guess you are no your own. It is up to you to do the research. All I can do is tell you what I know.

David Ashton

What I shall do, when I find time, is to get a Hebrew-Welsh and a Hebrew-Icelandic dictionary to see if there more than a few accidental similarities apart from Biblical names or loan-words caused by ancient contact between “Aryans” and “Semites” (as linguistics have used these terms).

May I ask whether Yahweh and Yashua are persons in a Trinity in your view? And whether Yahweh literally is the image of a man who walked in the literal Garden of Eden? And why he created non-white peoples? And why you, along with Ethiopans, regard the “Enoch scriptures” as divinely inspired and/or completely inerrant?

Why?? There’s no such thing as a Hebrew-Welsh or Hebrew-Icelandic dictionary. Hebrew is a people. Hebrew comes from Abraham’s great great great great grandfather Eber. Eber means the colonizer and Hebrew means sons and or daughters of the colonizer. The Jews call Hebrew a language, and they control our government, media, printing presses, and so forth. Gaelic is what the Hebrews spoke. They didn’t speak Hebrew because they are Hebrews. They were/are Shemites or Semites. The Jews want to hide this fact because they want people in general to believe that they are Hebrew; when in fact, they are Edomites, Canaanites, and Khazars. A mixed people that are rejected by God. Hebrew was a dead language at the time of Christ because it actually didn’t exist at the time. There is a problem with the Trinity. It sounds good, but it is actually a roman catholic invention. There is much that was added to and taken out of the Bible. The Trinity is one of them. I’ll have to check, but I don’t think that the Trinity is actually in the Bible. Yahweh isn’t an image. Some think that it was actually Jesus Christ that walked in the Garden of Eden. This is possibly true since Jesus Christ states that he was with the father. He said that he was one with the Father but yet separate. Like a different entity. First of all, most of the non white people were created by us, not by Yahweh. How do I know this? because most of them are hybrids. If God Yahweh condemns Hybridity (Deuteronomy 7, Deuteronomy 23:2) He would have created them. Many of these people could have come from the first creation before Lucifer fell and his name was changed to Satan. The Bible isn’t the Enoch scriptures even though the prophet Enoch did write books. It is suggested that he may have written up to 300. I have the first book of Enoch. Ethiopia should not be confused with the Ethiopia of today, which is a black nation. At one time Ethiopia was a vast empire that extended from Mesapotomia to Africa, and the Ethiopians were white people. Ethiopia means sun burnt faces. Blacks don’t get sun burnt faces. Also, the country of Ethiopia was established about 1904. So the Bible isn’t Enoch or Ethiopian. You have to be careful now a day. Ethiopians now are considered black when they weren’t in the time of Enoch. The Bible is backed up by science and Archaeology. Historical records have proven the Bible time and time again. The problem is that there is much hidden history, and there are a lot that is taken out of the Bible and added to the Bible. So now you have to be careful. the Bible condemns those that add to the scriptures that isn’t already there or take out of the scriptures that is already there. This is why the Bible tells you to study to show yourself approved. A good example of course is the Apocrapha. At one time there were close to 100 books in the Bible. Now there is only 66.

David Ashton

Thank you for clarifying your position on several issues on which I shall reserve comment for the time being.

I understood you to say that the Old Testament language was Gaelic and similar to Welsh and Icelandic. If so, the text, its grammar and vocabulary should closely resemble these Indo-European languages. That is what I proposed to verify.

What was the language spoken by Jesus Christ in his normal daily discourse?

I believe that it is possible to obtain a Gaelic Bible. I would love to get one, but I don’t speak Gaelic. However, I would love to since I am an Israelite. Languages change through out the years. That is why when I was in Iceland, I was surprised to find out that icelandic is the only language that has not changed in over 2,500 years. Of course the Jews don’t like this. They want everybody to be hybridized like they are. To obtain a Bible in the original language is probably very hard to come by. It seems that many scholars use their own opinions without knowing what the people were like at the time of the Old Testament and New Testament. In order to know the truth of what the scriptures say, you have to think the way the people back then thought. You cannot put them into our way of thinking.

So what did Jesus speak. Well, probably several languages. He no doubt knew Arabic, Hebrew, Latin, Aramaic, and Greek. Since Jesus and the Apostles quoted the Greek Septuagint all the time, the primary language he spoke was Greek. However, you must remember again the type of situation he was living in. The Jews throughout their history have never assimilated. Sort of like the blacks, Hispanics, and Asians in our own country. This is one of the main reasons why God Yahweh told his people Israel to separate themselves from other races (Deuteronomy 7, and 21:2) At the time of Christ Palestine was actually occupied by two nations or diverse people. I hesitate to call the Jews a nation because technically they aren’t.Palestine was occupied by Rome and they spoke Latin. Of Course the Latin Vulgate was used. Many believe that Latin could also possibly have been derived from Gaelic. In our day and age it is considered a dead language; but in Christ’s time, it was the language of the Roman world. He spoke Latin, or had a working knowledge of Latin. Aramaic is a Hebrew or Gaelic dialect, as well as Arabian. Aramaic is considered street Hebrew, and replaced Hebrew (or Gaelic) Hebrew (or Gaelic) was a dead language in Palestine. However, probably not in other parts of the world. Such as Ireland, Scotland, England and so forth. The Prophet Jeremiah took the daughters of the last King of Israel, King Zedekiah, to Ireland. Jeremiah is buried in Ireland, just southwest of Dublin. You can visit his tomb. Tea Tephi is buried at Tara which is west of Dublin.Tara in Gaelic is actually Tora. So Gealic was probably spoke there at the time of Christ. Tara was the capital of Ireland at that time and Tea Tephi married the King of the Irish. I’d say his name here, but I can’t spell it. When she married the King of the Irish Israel and Judah were joined together again just like the Bible says they would. Jesus primary language was Greek. The New Testament was written in Greek, not Aramaic as Lamsa says. Many think that the Greek Septuagint is false and corrupt, when actually it is the other way around. The Massoretic text is actually corrupt. This has been proven through the Dead Sea Scrolls, which actually support the Greek Septuagint over the Massoretic text. The King James uses the Massoretic text plus the Great Bible, the Geneva Bible, and I believe Wycliffe. King James also employed Jewish scribes, and this is why there are so man errors in the King James. So Jesus Spoke Greek because it was the primary language at that time. He probably also spoke Latin because that was the language of the Romans, he probably spoke or had a working knowledge of Hebrew (dead language except in certain areas such as in the priesthood. This may be one of the reasons why the Jews call themselves Hebrews, because they usurped the priesthood when Herod the great assassinated John Hyrcanus II and killed the true Judahite priesthood). He probably also had a working knowledge of Arabic. I think that both Aramaic and Arabic are similar, and are of the Syriac dialect..

David Ashton

PS – August 28. 20 PM GMT. Your long answer to my question about the laguage spoken by Jesus has been deleted, but I have seen it. With respect, I find some of what you say interesting, but as a linguist, and student of the Bible, Christian origins and European prehistory myself, I disagree with much of what you say, and I can assure you that it is not because I am under “Khazar” or “Satanic” control! In fact, other BI and CI groups would also disagree with you on this or that point. It is true that Aramaic and Arab belong to the same family of languages but also along with what is correctly known as Hebrew.

Boy you have really been deceived. How are they distinct?? Please tell me. You say your a Christian but yet you believe in Jewish lies. How come German Icelandic Gaelic Welsh English Latin Greek all come from the same family. Why is it that Hebrew (Gaelic) is in Englis, Welsh, Latin, Greek, and so forth. Stop listening to Jewish nonsense like the Apostle Paul told you to do. You can’t be much of a linguist if you believe your fables. Indo-European languages came from Adam. Who was Adam. The first white man in this creation. There was only one language until the tower of babel fell right. What was that language. It couldn’t have been Hebrew because Hebrew wasn’t around. What language was that?? Welsh and dialects of Welsh. In other words Gaelic. So where did Aramaic come from Hebrew (which isn’t a language), Greek and so forth come from. You have Spanish which is a European language that comes from Ibernia which means the land of the Hebrews. Mexicans don’t speak Spanish they speak Hispanic which is a hybrid language. Mexican’s are hybrids. It doesn’t come from Spanish, It is part of Spanish. Where in the world do you think Hebrew (which isn’t a language, Aramaic, and Greek come from? It has to have a source, it just doesn’t pop up on its own. All European languages come from Indo-Europeans. THEY WERE WHITE PEOPLE —-WHITE PEOPLE. Greek Aramaic (street Hebrew) and Hebrew (which isn’t a language) came from the same source. Adam means white man, blood in the face red. Jesus Christ only came for Israel which are the white Caucasian, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred people.They are of the family of Noah. Ham and Jephtha who are Indo-European are from the same family. Boy the street light in your family isn’t to bright.

David Ashton

Yes, the Indo-Europeans were white people.
No, Adam and Noah did not speak Welsh!!
I shall not get into a discussion as to whether these were real people who lived a few thousand years ago.

You can see an extensive vocabulary match between Hebrew, Arabic and Aramaic, but not a comparable match between these similar languages and any Indo-European languages.

I see no point in further response to arrogant abuse from someone who cannot even write English correctly.

Well stupid you don’t write English correctly either. Why should I take abuse from you. I never said that Adam and Noah spoke Welsh. Welsh comes directly from the Hebrew you moron. I think you better go back to school. I can see you haven’t had much learning. Where in the world did Hebrew (Gaelic) Arabic and Aramaic come from?? Did it fall out of the sky. They are not different. Hebrew (Gaelic) is in English, French, German, and so forth. The reason, these are Israelite countries where the twelve tribes of Israel abide in.Your arrogants and the lack of English understanding, and the lack of correct English usage is laughable. Before you start cricizing me, maybe what you need to do is to turn your life over to Jesus Christ. something you haven’t done, and the reason is because you would have to get out of your Judeo-Christian nonsense and get into Christian Identity which is true Christianity. You have no defense. Nothing you have said has been proven true.There is to much proof to prove that you are wrong.

David Ashton

PS – Isaiah 14’s contribution which implied that Noah spoke Welsh seems to have disappeared (by his own hand, not by moderation). Anyhow, he definitely thinks the “two languages of the Old Testament” are “Welch [sic] and Icelandic”!

As he combines gross insults with historical drivel, I understand why his ravings could be considered just a bit OTT for sensible debate on this website.

No there is no such thing as black Hebrews. That is another false doctrine. However, the Hebrews and Israelites were white people. Hebrew means the sons and daughters of the colonizer. There are several marks to prove who Israel is, and blacks do not fit any of these marks and neither do the Jews. These marks are:

1) Israel to be great and mighty nation Gen 12:2, 18:18, Deut. 4:7-8
Only the white race has ever been great and mighty nations.Not true of blacks

2) Israel to have multitudinous seed. Gen 13:16 15:5 22:17
This is only true of the white race, not true of blacks

3) Israel to spread abroad to the West, East, North and South Gen 28:14 Isaiah 42:5,6 This is only true of the white race, not true of blacks

4) Israel to have a new home 2nd. Samuel 7:10 1st. Chron. 17:9 This is only true of the white race, not true of blacks.

5) Israels home to be north-west of Palestine Isa 49:12 Jer. 3:18.
Only true of whites, not true of blacks.
The Black Hebrew doctrine doesn’t fit any of the marks of Israel, and the Jews don’t fit any of the marks of Israel. Only the white race. Who have the covenant with God. No other race does.

David Ashton

Are you saying that Harold Rosenthal himself stated that Satan was the god of the Jews? If so, can we have the quotation or a reference?

This booklet contains the text of a most revealing and shocking interview of a Jew by the
name of Harold Rosenthal, which was conducted in 1976, by a concerned patriot, a Walter
White, Jr.. Mr. Rosenthal, an influential Jew learned in the Jewish ways and involved in the
workings of government in Washington, D.C., explained the Jewish involvement and cause of
the major problems we face today.

Rosenthal, in exposing certain aspects of the ‘inner invisible world of Jewry’, revealed the
modes and tactics Jews have used in destroying Christian civilization and covertly attaining
control over our lives and governments. The result has been a ‘hidden tyranny’ upon us like
the tyranny waged against the Saints by the red beast system of Revelation referred to as
‘Mystery Babylon’.

But how could such a small number of Jews enslave so many people and gain such an
overwhelming control over their governments, especially without their being aware of it?
The answer to this may be found in Christ’s parable of the unjust steward, which represents
Jewry. They are able to prevail in the world despite their ungodly ways because of their
cunning and shrewd ways. As Christ said “For the children of this world are in their
generation wiser than the children of light.” (Luke 16:8)

In other words, the Jew, with his worldly mind set, is wiser than God’s Christian people.
When you read the words of Mr. Rosenthal the reality of this statement will come to light.
This problem was so prevalent and important for us to overcome that Christ had instructed
us to “be wise as serpents”. (Matthew 10:16)

America and the world is now covered in political, economic, moral and social problems
which need to be acted upon by Christian people. As Edmund Burke stated: “The only thing
necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” But before we can properly act
we need a proper (not just a superficial) understanding of the problem. This booklet will help
provide the reader with that understanding.

Charles A. Weisman June, 1992

David Ashton

Rosenthal seems to have been referring to the behavior of Jews not the theology of Judaism.

One other thing, The Bible states that God Yahweh breathed into Adam and Adam became a living soul. In other words, Adam and his descendants have the breath of God Yahweh in them, or are God breathed. This is no doubt one of the main reasons why the Adamites (white people) are less violent than other races. However, that shouldn’t make anybody believe that white people are wimpy. When they go by God Yahweh’s commandments and stay true to their heritage, they become a might force to be reckoned with. In fact, they are the most courageous, and formitable advisory that anybody can have. The battle of Blood River in 1838 is a very good example. 30,000 Zulu’s attacked 430 Boers. When the battle was over, over 15,000 Zulu’s were dead and one Boer was slightly injured. White people are starting to get angry. Black people better watch out. Have we forgotten that Samson took the jaw bone of an ass and slew 300 Philistines. Jonathan and his armor barer killed 20 Philistines. When God Yahweh finally unleashes his people, blacks better run for the hills. They will be destroyed. Watch, look, and listen, you will see it happen.

NordicHeritage

Evolution explains this much easier than some fairy tale. No need to use the god stuff when it can easily be explained by plain old science.

If evolution explains it, how come it has already been debunked by science. Tut Tut now, no need to try to explain it with plain old science when that plain old science actually supports the Bible. Have you ever seen evolution?? of course not, it doesn’t exist. If it did, you would see evolution right in front of you. You would see animals that looked like they were half fish and half mammal, but you don’t. Even Darwin stated that evolution was nothing more of a theory. Communism is a Jewish government system that advocates evolution, and is actually their religion. Without a belief in a higher being, a creator, you have to resort to a belief in something else. That something else is you. If there is no God Yahweh, then you must be God Yahweh. However, the Bible states that God Yahweh will not share his glory with anybody. Maybe it is about time to get back to good old common sense. After all Psalm 14:1 and Psalm 53:1 states, “the fool says in his heart that there is no God Yahweh.” For how long are you going to continue to be a fool.

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

The only ones left who deny the overwhelming proof of evolution are religious fundie fruitcakes like you. You are a coward who can’t cope with your own mortality so you stay drunk on Jesus 24/7.

Have you ever seen evolution? you should, but you haven’t because it doesn’t exist. God Yahweh created everything, and it has been proven. The real cowards are those that believe in the evolution nonsense. I have eternal life because I know that there is an eternity.Considering that Jesus Christ tells me to seek the kingdom of heaven and to keep my eyes on him (Jesus), it is good to stay drunk this way. Remember, Psalm 14:1 and Psalm 53:1, “The fool in his heart says that there is no God Yahweh.

E_Pluribus_Pluribus

Jindal is calling for an end to pattern recognition.

BonusGift

If “brevity is the soul of wit”, then that is one heck of a comment.

Franklin_Ryckaert

Pattern recognition is called “prejudice” by liberals, but in reality it is postjudice, which in many situations can save your life.

Spartacus

“There is no more shallow, hollow, or soulless way to think about human beings than in terms of their skin color.”

———————————————————————————————————————

Someone should inform this idiot that race is not just about skin color :

skara_brae

Never mind a thousand, your comparison pictures are worth a million words. Well done.

Romulus

Thank you, my friend. Your pics speak volumes!

Lee_CPA

That picture isn’t complete without Detroit…..

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Skin color is as relevant as the color of your socks, it’s all about behavior and dishonest Jindal knows it.

BonusGift

It’s a bit like saying that possessing blue (or green) eyes or being male are not critical to being a good fighter pilot. They may not be but men with those traits have significantly greater odds of being aces, while those without those traits are almost guaranteed to be victims of those that they have them. In short, it not skin color per say but the traits associated with various shades and colors that is the issue.

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Obviously what you write is true. My point was that Jindal likes to pretend it is the color of ones skin that is causing the bias and not the antisocial behaviors that so often go along with it. Jindal quote – “So here we are, in the most advanced, successful, and powerful nation in the history of the world, and yet we continue to struggle to get past the color of each other’s
skin.” Jindal does not want to face racial differences in behavior, namely criminal behavior, honestly. He is your typical dishonest politician. He would literally have to be retarded to honestly believe that skin tone differences cause any kind of issues at all between racial groups. So since I know he is not retarded, he is then by default being dishonest.

BonusGift

I agree, yet I cannot help but think that many like him would pass a lie detector test on the issue. I just get the sense that the brainwashing is so strong for some (although possibly not him) and/or they need to push the lie(s) to maintain or improve their position that they believe things that are contrary to simple observable facts.

serious123

Another excellent post based on logic. Hit me like brick, the man is indeed not retarded.

pcmustgo

And cultural differences.

serious123

Well put.

Tim_in_Indiana

Funny how this guy talks about how his parents came to America to be given a chance, then does nothing but bash America throughout the rest of the piece. Where is his criticism of India, with its heavy caste system and unwelcoming attitude towards non-Indians? Once again, being anti-racist is something only whites are expected to do.

In 2003, I decided to run for governor of Louisiana, a state where David Duke got 44 percent of the statewide vote in 1990.

Speaking of David Duke, some of the best words he ever wrote are the following:

__________

Race is real.

It is flesh and blood; brain and hormones.

It is in every cell, in our DNA and in every particle of our being.

It creates poverty or wealth; crime or community; superstition or science; ignorance or education; tyranny or freedom. It composes the melodies of Mozart or the obscenities of a rap song.

It creates glittering cities of promise or disease-ridden slums.

It slashes and burns the Amazon or plants a million trees.

It gives birth to Aphrodites or crack babies.

It carries mankind to the moon or casts him into hell.

It not only colors our skin, it colors the world.

It expresses itself in millions of ways overt and subtle; hateful and sublime; raw and refined.

And it rules us whether or not we want to acknowledge its power.

It is like the tide.

It will have its way.

Romulus

Any body ever see an african devoid of pigment? I have! Still an african.
This speech is garbage. Teddy roosevelts nightmare is realized. America is nothing more now than a tangling squabble of nationalities and ethnicities.
This speech coming from a guy whose people have 3.5 times the amount of people in america. Whites only make up anout 9% of the global population.

Antipodean WN

Actually our numbers are actually still strong compared to other races. We are second after North Asians like the Chinese, Japanese etc.

I did a count – there are 1.2 to 1.3 billion of us, which is more than blacks and more than Indians.

The problem is not the absolute numbers though. The problem is our proximity to other races which could lead to dilution.

Even if our numbers were small, like say the Japanese (who consider themselves a race apart from even Koreans and Chinese), that would not matter as long as there is geographical separation. Geographical separation will of course also eliminate the possibility of miscegenation, and other social pathologies associated with non-whites.

Romulus

That’s about the same number friends at the census bureau shared. Although, IMO there are a few that I would exclude from the total.
More than a few suspect groups are counted as white and 1.2 out of 7.3 billion total humans is not such a large percentile. Considering a large portion of the total number are AARP members and birthrates are below replacement levels for the majority, it obviates the problem.

Aside from the fact that he’s not white, he’s not acceptable as a Presidential candidate for another reason:

Would you expect a President Piyush Jindal to sign a bill to reduce the number of H-1B visas?

The Republican Party nominating him would be enough of a clue that they’ve totally surrendered on the H-1B issue, and we already know most of the Republican establishment and even some of the non-establishment have already.

Vonhauer

It isn’t merely the color of one’s skin, Mr. Jindal, much as you would like it to be. No, race goes far beyond skin color. Racial differences often have profound consequences in terms of intelligence, tendency to commit crime, lack of empathy, treatment of women, and more. I am afraid race is here to stay, Mr. Jindal.

Nice play on white altruism though. Many whites will fall for it.
.

anew

Every thing this guy says or writes is like nails on a chalkboard.

This man went to good schools, presumably he’s not an idiot; doesn’t he hear himself (I presume that the Indian-American governor outsourced—hehe— this writing assignment to an underling, but he must have at least read it.)? Doesn’t he see that he has nothing to say, and doesn’t say it very well either?

He must. He’s just out for political power for the sake of it. Indeed, he has been a politician he’s whole adult life. And there is no more shallow, hollow, or soulless life than that.

Funruffian

“Divorce is through the roof, pornography is everywhere, sexual predators are on the loose and on the Internet, our abortion rate is higher than almost every First World country, vulgarity and profanity are mainstream and commonplace. In general, our culture has become coarser, and I regret that.”
Does Mr. Jindal care to evaluate why these factors are so prevalent? Does he care to research which race is the most interested in profanity, rape and pornography? He asks the valid questions without attempting to answer them. I am so glad he was never chosen to run on the Vice-Presidential ticket. In lieu of this article I would never support him. The late Dr. King, who Jindal so admires, was a philanderer, adulterer, prostitution pimp and was very involved in pornography of his own.
This proves that a state Governor is ignorant to the truth.

IstvanIN

This proves that a state Governor is ignorant to the truth.
Like all good Republicans.

sbuffalonative

Maybe he attended that speech Joe Biden gave.

dukem1

Politics is his profession….so be it…what do you expect? He’s gonna come out and say MLK was a dirty dog? Like some New Yorker running for office is gonna say the Yankees are a bunch of losers?
Our culture demands that fealty be paid, deserved or not…Most of us leave a tip regardless of how lousy the waiter was.
It is the glue that holds civilization together…the little – or big- white lies that prevent an absolutist inertia from stopping everything dead in it’s tracks.

sbuffalonative

There is no more shallow, hollow, or soulless way to think about human beings than in terms of their skin color.

Skin color is an excellent proxy for behavior and future outcomes in life.

c684570

Article: “There is no more shallow, hollow, or soulless way to think about human beings than in terms of their skin color. It is completely inane.”

I’m slightly more concerned with the fact that a group that is 3% of the American population commits 51% of all homicides. It has little to do with skin color.

skara_brae

The ludicrously named “Bobby” (like those call-centre drones that talk like Gunga Din but introduce themselves as “Jason”) can host all the southern barbecues he wants and toss the pigskin with Drew Brees ’til the sacred cows come home but do not be fooled America.
His bunch have utterly changed the fabric of the UK, flooding tiny picturesque villages and turning formerly neat, tidy, working class neighbourhoods of all cities into squalid mirror images of Delhi/Mumbai etc.
He’s a trojan horse. Beware.

newscomments70

He named himself after the Bobby Brady character on the Brady Bunch. He was a fan as a a child, he made that his American name.

skara_brae

A hilarious and all too transparent attempt to further weave himself into the American fabric.
As previously stated: He’s a trojan horse. Beware.

Richard

I remember feeling micro-aggressed by the subtle racism implicit in the Tabu episodes.

White Mom in WDC

When blacks, Asians, Indians, Latinos stop being racist towards whites and when they leave the US, then race will not matter. Until then, I am a white NW European living in Amurkistan

IKantunderstand

Mr. Jindal, once upon a time, and it does now seem a very long time ago, we were called Americans. It meant a white person. Period. Because, you see, Mr. Jindal, it was Whites who carved this country out of wilderness. It was Whites who introduced a new form of government. And, finally, it was Whites, who created the most prosperous country ever in the history of the world. Aren’t you lucky that you were allowed to emigrate to what used to be the greatest country in the world. And, frankly, from one of the most color conscious nations on the face of the earth! The Indian caste system, leaves the European class system in the dust. But, hey, appreciate the advice from a relative newcomer, who, as they say, has had absolutely no skin in the game. Hey, why don’t you take your political savvy and inclusiveness to India, you know, where it has never existed.

pcmustgo

They blame the Indian caste system on the British colonization.

IKantunderstand

Well, than “they” would be wrong. The caste system existed well before the British showed up. Oh, and the British never “colonized” India. That would imply thousands of British moved in and took over. Never happened. Tell me please, how many British ever settled in and lived in India, as in, you, know, made their home there and never wanted to leave? The British who occupied India were there on assignment. When there assignment was over, they gladly went home. Other than a good excuse to drink quinine and gin all day long, the Brits were not much interested in living in India permanently.

Funruffian

Mr. Jindal, I never think about skin color. Skin color is harmless and is less than 4 millimeters of fragile flesh. We here at AMREN could care less about someone’s skin-tone regardless.
What we do care about is crime, rape, flash mobs, riots, theft, murder, assault and battery and a host of other social ills that are the core persuasion of a particular race. Race has very little to do with skin-tone.
What I find offensive about Governor Jindal’s statement is that he fails to see the complexity of the issue. His parents come to America to reap all the riches and opportunities America has to offer that their native India could not offer. Yet, in the same vein, he has the gall to bash America and its history.

pcmustgo

I care about East Indians who want to “get revenge” on “whites” for “the british colonizing India” too… I worry because I’ve randomly been treated to racist comments from East Indian strangers and people I worked for, multiple times. I also worry about the cultural alienation unassimilated asian and east indian immigrants bring. Love their food though!

Major

Who’s Jindal kidding? I’ve never met a more biased and race conscious people than Indians…his kind of Indians. I know quite a few of them ( most own a donut shop, gas station of a convenience store ). Not one of them married outside of their skin or tribes. Everyone of them married another Indian…why? To keep their “race” pure, that’s why. They’re kids are the right color / shade of brown. They all converse in their native language..and 99% of them use the name..”Patel”. Look in the phone book…there’s zillions of them. Some of them escaped Kenya, where they had done pretty well until the locals took notice and made life tough for them.

They all miss “home and the mother country” and every summer take a very expensive trip back to Bombay or Mumbai to see mom and pop…who by the way rule their entire lives. Thus the made in the “kitchen” marriages between cousins of neighbors or friends.

Gotsumpnferya

The Caste system is alive and well in India , as well as at the “S” . *grins*

rightrightright

The low caste Indians are the ones with darker skins. Funny, that.

Major

Yo..wise guy..I get ya.

Gotsumpnferya

You speak truth . First hand experience .

pcmustgo

Most East Indians are computer programmers, work in finance, or sometimes design. Regardless, they are boring immigrant types.

Bossman

That is the only kind of East Indian that is allowed into the USA. In Canada and the UK, there are all kind of East Indians but they are all indeed very boring people; same goes for East Asians.

“Under what logic would any intelligent, logical, or decent person give any thought to the pigmentation of a person’s epidermis?”

The logic of survival Jindal…and the skin color is used as a flag to warn us of the real potential of barbarous and savage behavior due to our skin color. To me..it’s a clear warning sign…danger, danger. One is either so naive or a moonbeamed liberal to think that they’re not a target…cause they just love diversity.

Time to stop thinking 145,000 years separation from a common ancestor on completely different continents and selective environments only effected skin color. Evolution was not that politically correct. It is highly, HIGHLY unlikely that we developed such different measurable physical traits yet somehow our brains retained the same default ability as a constant through all of that time and selection.

Bossman

No matter how different people look, they are still human and have the same hopes and dreams. Time, distance and geography differentiated them into separate races but they do have a common origin.

Franklin_Ryckaert

Well yes, but why not try to fulfill their “hope and dreams” in their own countries? Why should always the white man’s achievements be the “hope and dreams” of the non-whites?

Frans

Maybe you’re right, but why should productive citizens in the US (or any where else) be forced by government to support the ones who for whatever reason will not or cannot support themselves? The US taxpayer has paid trillions and made gigantic sacrifices to help with ‘hopes and dreams’, to no avail. Yet the whining and blaming of whitey continue and we whites are the ones who are asked, required, actually, to make all the sacrifices and concessions to “get over it” as Jindal says. Race most assuredly matters and obviously we’re sick of being preached to by these pin-headed politicians!!

Franklin_Ryckaert

If you look at it, the whole “race problem” is actually a gigantic parasite problem.

Dave4088

Funny coming from a man who hails from a nation (India) with a racial caste system. I might be dreaming, but 2-3 yrs ago I also thought I read an article where Jindal was in favor of stronger economic ties to India and higher levels of immigration of people with red dots on their foreheads. Sure Bobby, race doesn’t matter. Only a white person would fall for that.

This article was intended for a white audience since they are the only ones who, despite all evidence to the contrary, fervently cling to the belief that a post racial America is just a tax cut, set aside, and Republican or two away from realization.

John Ulfsson

-I also thought I read an article where Jindal was in favor of stronger economic ties to India and higher levels of immigration of people with red dots on their foreheads.

And people wonder why whites would be against immigration. It seems like 99% of the time they get in office and immediately pursue the interests of “their” group over the white majority.

ThomasER916

There’s nothing more suicidal than the mass immigration of violent, low IQ, blacks and browns in a Welfare State.

And there’s nothing more soulless than the Leftists and Jews who are deliberately making this happen.

Nick A Siggers

It’s not the melanin content that is the issue it’s the genetic content that causes certain races to commit homicide, rape, and other violent crime at 8 to 14 times the European rates.

jackryanvb

“So here we are, in the most advanced, successful, and powerful nation in the history of the world, and yet we continue to struggle to get past the color of each other’s skin.”

Jack responds: never let these brown affirmative action, fake conservatives get away with using fake patriotism to support race denying treason.

America is no longer the best, most prosperous, powerful country in the world. And mass immigration of Jindal’s 3rd world immigrants is big reason for our decline.

Just come back that Switzerland and Finland and Norway are doing much better than the USA now.

Gotsumpnferya

The cumulative effect of diversity in the human race will ensure the devolvement and dilution of values .

IstvanIN

Governor Jindal believes this because Fair and Handsome didn’t work for him.

WR_the_realist

The last people in the country who really want to ignore race are the leftists. They insist upon the existence of white skin privilege, a racial concept if ever there was one. And they also insist upon doing racial bean counting in every aspect of our lives, whether it’s which racial groups are hired or which racial groups have friends of which other racial groups. And nobody has been encouraging the rise of the hyphenated American more than the multiculturalists. And even Bobby Jindal, an Asian Indian, knows, or ought to know, that it would be very unwise to move into a black neighborhood.

John Ulfsson

Our politicians believe in fairy tales because they’re more pleasant than reality.

Funny time we’re living in,

Luca

Politicians repeat fairy tales because it gets them votes and keeps them in power.

My best friend from Australia called just now. Even I can barely understand his accent. He’s Scottish, Russian and Aborigine, and has red hair and blue eyes, so like me, he’s “passing”. I miss him and his Ockerese “Strane” already.

He might as well be my brother. I’m so happy he called.

pcmustgo

My best friend has a tiny bit of American Indian in her… she’s probably 1/8th or so…

Bossman

Is she pretty and vivacious ? From my experience, white women with a slight touch of the native are usually prettier and act more alive.

Yes, the whole problem can be summed up as “skin color”. I become violently ill and full of “HATE” whenever anybody white gets a deep tan. It makes me feel like they are beneath me, you know?
No Jindal we all know that bullshit ploy that we are haters and racists because of a color. It has nothing to do with it.
I saw a number of anti-white racist crimes reported on mainstream news, and the words “black male suspect” were actually uttered. I guess that they’re starting to see you can’t keep a lid on it forever….

pcmustgo

Bobby doesn’t get it- Race OVERLAPS WITH CULTURE, almost to a T. Non-whites come from adversarial cultures that are angry at and want to get revenge on white/european cultures. Blacks especially so. Many East Indians have treated me horribly in life, especially when I was in service positions in their homes, in overtly racist ways. Also, most East Indians are boring immigrant types who haven’t picked up our culture yet. There is nothing wrong with admitting that. It’s called honesty.

Totally tired of the “skin color” conversation.

pcmustgo

And might I add, non-whites are under incredible societal/cultural pressures to resent whites… American culture totally revolves around white bashing now.

pcmustgo

They’re encouraged to hate whites.

MikeofAges

I think you’ve hit on one of the problems of American society under the constitution. Anything that gets started metasisizes and finally turns into a cancer that can only be expiated by some great convulsion.

The way we got into our present situation was that after the World War ended, the government and the establishment behind the scenes decided they did not want large numbers of World War II vets to end up permanently unemployed and underemployed. Had that policy not been followed, what happened after 1970 might have happened much sooner. But it might not have been as virulent. So what you see is American society reeling from extreme to extreme. This time around, the demographics have been so altered that there may be no going back.

MikeofAges

Bobby can be one of us because in his quirky way he is one of us, able to adapt to our tenets because he came here preadapted and willing to see his issue assimilated entirely into our system.

Mark Hillyard

1{A Song or Psalm of Asaph.} Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.

2For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.

3They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones.

4They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.

ShermanTMcCoy

Politico needs your comments, folks.

MikeofAges

The end of race, only for the people it has ended for. No end of race for the people who have kicked off the island, including the whites who need not apply. The people who are living in the post-racial subculture are few, and have no stable future because they have no transmittable identity. Like all affinity based subcultures, they can live only by recruiting from the outside, largely. The only exceptions, on the left side of the political ledger, are the hereditary “red diaper babies” and the “hippies”, two groups identifiable by persistent family formation, a transmittable culture, and, actually, racial and ethnic homogeneity

jeffaral

The Christian white conservative people of Louisiana are showing their true colours supporting their fellow indian Christian, Mr Bobby Jindal. Crazianity at its best!

Thor Bonham

Another idiot ..

MBlanc46

So, this is Bobby Jindal trying to cash in on the anniversary of “The Speech”. If he wrote this incoherent bundle of cliches, he needs a speechwriter. If a speechwriter wrote it, he needs a new speechwriter. Every time Jindal opens his mouth, he looks less like a viable presidential candidate.

Frans

MBlanc, I was thinking similar thoughts while reading his essay. I believe that European-Americans have made EVERY effort to help the negro race assimilate, but for the most part they either refuse or are incapable. It would be devolving into disaster if we went in their direction and adopted their vulgarity, violence, victim attitudes, indolence, and, well, you get my point. So what does Jindal propose we do? Negroes aren’t going to change. The social engineering with its affirmative action and egalitarianism that the US government has foisted on a civilized society for 50 years has destroyed it! As you said Jindal only spouts clichés, not solutions. Come to think of it, though, MBlanc, that’s all politicians ever do.

MBlanc46

Blather and lies are the tools of the trade of politicians, especially in a two-party system. I follow party politics the way other people follow horse-racing: as a handicapping exercise. But I believe that the parties are an obstacle, not a vehicle, to resolving the social situation in the US.

Mark Hillyard

Foreigners should not rule over us.

Vonhauer

MerlinV posted a photo of a Mursi woman (found at any national geographic type site) and a photo of a European woman, both with their children. The point of the photo was to highlight the visual differences between two people of opposite races in their natural settings.

Those photos did more to emphasize that race does in fact go beyond skin color more than any other comment on this thread. The photos were not in any way vulgar, obscene, or misleading, yet the MODERATOR REMOVED THE PHOTO!

WHAT IS THAT ABOUT?!

MerlinV

I noticed the wimp never gave a reason. Does Jared hire high school kids to stay up all night and watch the website?

Thor Bonham

Yeah and who would you vote for ? Let me guess Ron Paul ?

NordicHeritage

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”
― Winston Churchill

Oh, dear gawd! Who would attend something such as this? This useless puke’s not even literate, so I know he can’t write a book! Twilight Zone, indeed. This is just another symptom of the end of civilization—-that anyone would PAY to see and hear this worthless-excuse-for-human. So disheartening!

Frans

“Race is biological, which is precisely why it can’t be overcome. This revolt against the natural is America’s undoing.” Well said, DJ2!

Franklin_Ryckaert

I call liberalism a jihad against reality (and that includes of course nature).

Young black males are about 3% of the population and commit more than half of the crime.

Freedom Hayak

You didn’t hear it from him juts his roommate – sounds like what Tom Wolf would call radical chic, just putting a poster up of someone he thought was cool, but knew nothing about

Evette Coutier

Jindal’s essay in a nutshell: I’m a minority. Vote for me.

Mark Hillyard

This is not a new thing. Different magazines over the years have
had advertisements re: The Future. One, in a news magazine before the
internet, had a Tower of Babel, another showed a picture of The
Future Look of Mankind which showed a mixed bred person with Oriental
eyes, brown skin and black hair. I remember vividly because I said
bull-stuff. I am sure all this racism stuff is a result of this
form of attack on the Caucasian.

I firmly believe that we are the direct blood of Abraham, Isaac
and Jacob/Israel. I’ve studied this for decades now and there is
everything to prove me (and those I learned from) correct except for
the ‘blessing’ of the Roman Church and her daughter churches. This is
also one of the “Mysteries of the Kingdom”. Most preachers
will tell you that the Northern Kingdom of Israel is gone, it isn’t,
Jesus called them The Lost Sheep of Israel. Those same preachers
will throw you out of their little church if you dare to talk about
this, they’ve done it to me and others.

Abraham was shown that his children through Isaac and Jacob would
spread out…Gen 28:14 “And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt
spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to
the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the
earth be blessed.” We are destined to lead the World to a peaceful
situation by God and in due time.

All this we see today is the Worlds effort to eradicate Israel from the
face of the Earth by mixing the races and or by war in all it’s
forms.

“The Prince of Darkness Grim, we tremble not for him; His rage
we can endure, for lo, his doom is sure, One little word shall fell
him.” Martin Luther 1529

“And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and
thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and
to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed
shall all the families of the earth be blessed.” We are
destined to lead the World to a peaceful situation by God
and in due time.

All this we see is the Worlds effort to eradicate Israel
from the face of the Earth by mixing the races and or by
war in all it’s forms.

“The Prince of Darkness Grim, we tremble not for him;
His rage we can endure, for lo, his doom is sure, One
little word shall fell him.” Martin Luther 1529

Mark Hillyard

1{A Song or Psalm of Asaph.} Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God.

2For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.

3They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. (Lost Sheep of the House of Israel, that is US.)

4They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.

David Ashton

One Jindal would be OK, even a curious asset, but hundreds of Jindals would create a “problem”.

We are having some “fun” as thousands of “untouchables” are currently complaining about “discrimination” by thousands of caste Hindus in — Britain! The Equalities Ministry (shades of “1984”) is perplexed.

Orion_Blue

We can’t seem to get enough of this topic, and correspondingly, the media appetite for all things race-related is unquenchable.

The reason we can never get enough of it is because it is never discussed openly and honestly and of course, there are all those narcissistic libtards waving their anti-racism credentials around.

I find it patronising that another sharp-elbowed Asian would presume to lecture a White European built nation on what is good for it. These sharp elbowed grasping Asians remind me of other highly cohesive and self-serving ethnics who bedazzle us with fancy worm tongue chatter whilst deftly concealing their own long term agenda. In some ways, this Bobby Dazzler poses more of a threat with his emollient saccharine chatter than the average recognisable Bantu thug peddling dope on a street corner.

dean53

To me, racism is GOOD — because racism preserves my people and keeps me safe in a hostile world. To me, Jindal will never be “just” an American. He’s an interloper; someone who doesn’t belong here & is alien to me and my heritage. I do not believe in the I-have-a-dream BS “equality” that Jindal celebrates. This Marxist ideology is anathema to me. But Jindahl is here — and unfortunately, he’s superior to most Louisiana whites — including my idiotic all-white siblings who voted for Obama. It’s not his fault that his parents came to America. The fault lies with Yankees who defeated the Confederacy in the Southern War for Independence and modern day “Christians.” One hundred & fifty years later we are now being trampled underfoot by foreigners — and too many brainwashed white Americans in the North & South seem to think this is a good thing. We have become eunuchs in our own country. Too bad “Give me liberty or give me death” has become nothing but an inspirational slogan from a bygone era instead of a way of life for white America.

pcmustgo

Hmmm, whites are taking over many black hoods here in Brooklyn.

ThomasER916

By constantly ignoring race we’re ignoring things that really exist. What’s even more dangerous is when you’re the only one ignoring an entire group you’ll find yourself outnumbered when they militate against you.

Carney3

Well now. India wallowed in socialism for a few decades but has made great strides since then. It will probably never catch up to China because of lower average IQ, but it’s got a big enough population for a critical mass of smart enough people to prop up a functioning civilization. India’s per capita income is rising very fast, and extreme poverty, while certainly still in existence, is falling as a proportion of the population. Beginning in the late 1960s, at the insistence of Western donors including LBJ, India implemented a far reaching and even harsh population control regime, which only relatively recently has been relaxed. India has also formally outlawed the caste system and has gone so far as to have an extensive affirmative action program for the untouchables.

I do agree they should not be allowed to come here and undermine our engineers, doctors, etc. for work. But I’d rather have that than low IQ mestizos.

David Ashton

Japan is a nation.

David Ashton

Of course, you can always claim that bits of the Bible you don’t like were put in or altered. You have to prove it with textual evidence.

Romulus

Well, hello there astral brother. The barbarians herein have forgiven me the transgressions of our forbears and I enjoy great comfort sharing their wisdom. Welcome!

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

All you do is prove you have a malfunctioning brain. Blind faith is for blind cowards. God is your booze bottle. You never grew up and stopped playing make believe.

“The inner defenses are unconscious. They consist of a kind of magic aura which the mind builds around cherished belief. Arguments which penetrate into the magic aura
are not dealt with rationally but by a specific type of pseudo-reasoning. Absurdities and contradictions are made acceptable by specious rationalizations.” — Arthur Koestler

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

You have no understanding period “guest” which is exactly why you cling to ignorant superstitions and beliefs of magic.

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Yeah, in your comic book reality pal. Magic magic magic!

disqus_Xz3UA6obwj

Dogma is not truth, it’s the exact opposite of truth and that’s the TRUTH!

Jack Burton

This idea of Americanism being nonracial, not be associated with Whites has only existed since the end of WW2 and the civil rights movement. Just like how slavery was ended and blacks got to vote after the Civil War, blacks fighting in our wars gets them favors. Fight in a war against the South? Okay you’re free, you can vote. Beat the nazis? Okay, we’ll invade the South again, ban segregation, integrate the schools at gunpoint and completely remove all White association with Americanism.