Forum Help

If you want to ask about changing your username, have login problems, have password problems or a technical issue please email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com

Posting help:

If you want to ask why a word can't be typed, your signature's been changed, or a post has been deleted see the Forum Rules. If you don't find the answer you can ask forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com though due to volumes we can't guarantee replies.

Login to MSE Forum

Join the MSE Forum

Skimlinks adds tracking to some, primarily retailers' links, to show they come from this forum. For some retailers, instead of using Skimlinks to turn the link into a tracked link, we use affiliated links set up through other third parties. Then if it generates revenue from that, this site is paid. The links don't change the content, or what you see or track individual data ? but they do help fund this free forum. So we hope you choose to switch it on. See the full Skimlinks factsheet for more.

Is there anyone around MSE that is clued up with regards to release of medical data without consent to an employer? It isn't a public interest/harm of patient situation, basically a screw up by a secretary.

Is there anyone around MSE that is clued up with regards to release of medical data without consent to an employer? It isn't a public interest/harm of patient situation, basically a screw up by a secretary.

Did you make the mistake or was it your records which were disclosed
Had the patient not given consent, or had they ticked the box saying I want to see the report first and wasn't given the chance to do so
What was the nature of the info disclosed
Why did the employer request the info

There may be a valid complaint to ICO here though not if for example the employer was querying the contents of a fit note and the doctor was confirming the patient had altered it! If it was you who made the error, then the employment consequences may depend on the circumstances.

You had another thread some time ago about your MIL unlawfully accessing your husband's medical records didn't you? As a consequence of that saga are you not already quite well versed in what is and isn't allowed and who you can complain to?

Same trust, but a different situation entirely, hence my query if anyone does have a grasp of it. =)

Employer requested medical report, patient asked for sight of it prior to it going to employer, medical report contain incorrect information and has been sent direct. Consultant has attempted to say wasn't patients right to see it.

Does consultant agree the info contained in the report was inaccurate? Or is this something which is or could be the subject of interpretation. E.g. (And just an example) the report says the patient is an alcoholic and the patient agrees they do drink alcohol but doesn't agree this is to excess or are addicted?

I think this is complicated by the fact that the patient did give consent albeit he wanted to see the report first. So it's not as clear cut as the consultant writing to the employer with no signed consent at all from the patient. You could take it to ICO but they may not take it particularly seriously particularly as no harm resulted to the patient. Possibly there are internal NHS complaints procedures you can use but as I said you are probably already familiar with these due to your previous experiences.

Edited to say: the rules are here (https://www.bma.org.uk/-/media/files/pdfs/practical%20advice%20at%20work/ethics/accesstomedicalreportsjune2009.pdf). Consultant may have been entitled to send the report if the patient didn't object within 21 days of a draft being sent, or if anything in the report might have been harmful to the physical or mental health of the patient, or if it included info about a third party. There is no right on patients part to have info corrected as such but he can ask for the doctor to put a note in the report to say that something is disputed. Patient can't ask for relevant info to be omitted from the report.

Personally I'd be concentrating on getting the inaccuracies corrected and on ongoing medical care.

Same trust, but a different situation entirely, hence my query if anyone does have a grasp of it. =)

Employer requested medical report, patient asked for sight of it prior to it going to employer, medical report contain incorrect information and has been sent direct. Consultant has attempted to say wasn't patients right to see it.

She wanted to see the records first, to try and prevent misinformation from being forwarded to a potential employer, by the sounds of things.

Yes, something has gone awry. I think you can only learn by the mistake - FIRST you ask to see your records, THEN (when you have established that all is correct) you give permission to the employer to see them.

Yes, something has gone awry. I think you can only learn by the mistake - FIRST you ask to see your records, THEN (when you have established that all is correct) you give permission to the employer to see them.

on the NHS website, the doctor must offer to send the report to the patient first and must not send it to the employer if the patient refuses after having sight of the report. If the information on the linked page is correct, then it appears the consultant has lied to the patient in saying the patient had no right to see it, when in fact legislation guarantees the patient not only had the right to see it but the right to forbid it being sent.

There's also this page with guidance for employers which says much the same thing:

How this site works

We think it's important you understand the strengths and limitations of the site. We're a journalistic website and aim to provide the best MoneySaving guides, tips, tools and techniques, but can't guarantee to be perfect, so do note you use the information at your own risk and we can't accept liability if things go wrong.

This info does not constitute financial advice, always do your own research on top to ensure it's right for your specific circumstances and remember we focus on rates not service.

We don't AS a general policy investigate the solvency of companies mentioned (how likely they are to go bust), but there is a risk any company can struggle and it's rarely made public until it's too late (see the section 75 guide for protection tips).

We often link to other websites, but we can't be responsible for their content.

Always remember anyone can post on the MSE forums, so it can be very different from our opinion.

MoneySavingExpert.com is part of the MoneySupermarket Group, but is entirely editorially independent. Its stance of putting consumers first is protected and enshrined in the legally-binding MSE Editorial Code.