While other MediaPost newsletters and articles remain free to all ... our new Research Intelligencer service is reserved for paid subscribers ...

Subscribe today to gain access to the every Research Intelligencer article we publish as well as the exclusive daily newsletter, full access to The MediaPost Cases, first-look research and daily insights from Joe Mandese, Editor in Chief.

Commentary

FilmOn Joins Rival Aereo, Asks FCC For Help Getting Cable License

Online video distributor FilmOn is joining its rival, Aereo, in asking the Federal Communications Commission for help in obtaining a cable license.

FilmOn revealed in an FCC filing that company
executives recently met with regulators, in hopes of convincing them to redefine “multichannel video programming distributor” to include online services like itself and Aereo.

“FilmOn intends to offer TV stations the right to elect must-carry or retransmission consent,” the company wrote in
its filing, which was uncovered last week by Politico. “FilmOn will also provide program exclusivity, emergency alerts and information, closed captioning, equal employment opportunity and to
otherwise comply in good faith with all of the rules and regulations that govern MVPD service.”

If the FCC redefines MVPDs, companies like Aereo and FilmOn will stand a better chance of
qualifying for a compulsory cable license -- which would enable them to transmit television shows online, providing they pay retransmission fees to the broadcast networks.

advertisement

advertisement

FilmOn says in its
letter to the FCC that a change in rules will “create regulatory parity between similar services, and promote competition to entrenched legacy video providers that will benefit consumers by
giving them more choices.”

Both Aereo and FilmOn offered services that allowed people to stream over-the-air television shows in real time to smartphones, tablets, and other devices.

Broadcasters said that both services infringed copyright because they “publicly” performed TV shows.

A legal battle between the broadcasters and Aereo went to the Supreme Court,
which ruled in June that Aereo doesn't have the right to stream shows in real time.

Aereo suspended operations soon after that decision. FilmOn still streams some programs, but no longer
appears to offer real-time streams from any of the broadcasters that sued the company.

But both companies have indicated that they'd like to stay in business, even if that means paying
retransmission fees. It's not clear whether the FCC intends to open the door for online-only companies to obtain cable licenses. But if the agency does so, it wouldn't be surprising for more startups
to join Aereo and FilmOn in competing to offer video content online.

For its part, FilmOn told regulators that it is engaging in “good faith negotiations” with broadcasters
“to provide fair compensation for the right to provide consumers with its innovative new online video distribution service.”

makoto saito from http://www.reencryption-tv.jp/,
October 28, 2014 at 9 p.m.

Judge Alison Nathan in New York - Oct. 23, 2014 - has split the Aereo Case into Two Legal Choices, One is Real-Time Service with Compulsory License i.e. Section 111 and Other is Time-Shift Service with Fair Use for Consumers, not for Compnany i.e. Section 107.

In Final Stage, Judge Nathan will answer the Question of whether Companies like Aereo could offer DVR-Style Tools without a License from the Broadcasters.

Meanwhile, the FCC is weighing whether to extend Real-Time Service for Satellite and Cable to OVD (Online Video Distributor) like Aereo and FilmOn.

The FCC could regulate the OVD's "Facility" like Cloud License Server in order to realtimely retransmit the Free OTA broadcast over the Internet.