The Supreme Court had earlier put a poser as to why there was no objection from lawmakers on the Centre’s decision to make Aadhaar mandatory for making PAN cards.

The apex court is hearing three petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 139 AA of the Income Tax Act which was introduced through the latest budget and the Finance Act 2017.(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)

The government defended in the Supreme Court its decision to make Aadhaar mandatory for issuing of PAN cards on Tuesday, saying it was done to curb the use of fake PAN cards across the country.

Attorney general (AG) Mukul Rohatgi told a bench comprising Justice AK Sikri and Justice Ashok Bhushan that the programme of PAN had become suspect as it could be faked even as Aadhaar is a “secure and robust” system by which the identity of an individual cannot be faked.

The AG said due to Aadhaar, the government has saved over Rs 50,000 crore on the schemes to benefit the poor as well as the pension schemes.

He said around 10 lakh PAN cards have been cancelled, while out of the 113.7 crore Aadhaar cards issued no case of duplication has been found by the government.

He also said Aadhaar was an effective tool to check the menace of terror funding and circulation of black money.

“The idea behind Aadhaar is to make a secure and robust system by which the identity of a person cannot be faked,” the attorney general told the court, which would continue hearing the arguments on Wednesday.

The apex court is hearing three petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 139 AA of the Income Tax Act which was introduced through the latest budget and the Finance Act 2017.

Section 139AA provides for mandatory quoting of Aadhaar or enrolment ID of Aadhaar application form for filing of income tax returns and making an application for allotment of PAN number with effect from July 1 this year.

Senior counsel Shyam Divan, representing the petitioners, had earlier argued that section 139AA was unconstitutional and was in “direct collision” with the Aadhaar Act.

He had also contended that there was no question of forcing a person to give his consent for Aadhaar and this was an issue which “alters the relationship of Republic of India with its citizens”.

The petitioner had also argued that a law-abiding tax payer cannot be forced to give his Aadhaar number while filing income tax returns and this was like an “electronic leash” as government would be able to keep a tab on its citizens.

“Nowhere in the world there is such a biometric system which can track a person 24X7. They (government) are doing it even before the age of consent,” he had said during the arguments.

The apex court had earlier put a poser as to why there was no objection from the lawmakers on the government’s decision to make Aadhaar mandatory for making PAN cards.

Rohatgi had also clarified that nowhere in section 139AA of IT Act, was it mentioned that it would be effective with retrospective effect.

The government had earlier told the apex court that fake PAN cards were being used to “divert funds” to shell companies.