The economics and politics of instability, empire, and energy, with a focus on Latin America and the Caribbean, plus other random blather and my wonderful wonderful wife. And I’d like a cigar right now.

The argument: English is widely-spoken and pretty much all you need for business. Add that to the ever-increasing efficiency of machine translation, and the case for expending mass resources to teach foreign languages disappears. Thus, we should cut back.

(1) The author points out that most of the world does not, in fact, speak English. Since Summers never argued that they did, it is hard to see the relevance of this point.

(2) The author then points out that a lot of immigrants to the United States speak a language other than English. Of course, their children lose those languages super-fast. Moreover, Summers never claimed that there were no non-English-speakers in the United States, and I have never anybody justify the resources spent on foreign-language teaching by saying that we need to communicate better with immigrants. If that is the author’s argument, then she needs to make it explicitly.

(3) Finally, after two non sequiturs, the author states that machine translation is imperfect. This is perfectly true. Some students of mine recently presented me with a Pemex integrated service contract machine-translated from Spanish: it was so incomprehensible that we went back to the Spanish and translated it ourselves. But ...

First, machine translation is getting better all the time. Summers’ argument is about the future. I want to know why the author of the Geocurrents post believes that translation will be as bad in 2050 as it is now! And I am superlatively annoyed that she does not tell me.

Second, the author then presents a frighteningly good and clear machine translation of a Russian poem. No, it isn’t as poetic as the human translations. But it is completely comprehensible. And since Summers is talking about “doing business in Asia, treating patients in Africa or helping resolve conflicts in the Middle East,” she needs to explain why the level of machine competence shown by her own example is not sufficient to those tasks.

At which point she also needs to explain why machine translation won’t become good enough by 2050. (Or, heck, by 2015!) But I repeat.

In short, the riposte does absolutely zero to grapple with Summers’ contention. It is an example of how not to construct an argument, because it doesn’t actually construct an argument.

Comments

You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

>The argument: English is widely-spoken and pretty much all you need for business.

This isn't answering *your* question, Noel, but I'm thinking of my daughter's Chinese teacher's growing language program at two high schools, and of many universities' expansion into China, predicated on the same (simplified by me) conclusion: it'll be good for global business. That said, my kid is always asking her Chinese teacher how to say words like "murder" and "poison." I feel like he got into this to teach leaders of tomorrow and he's ended up working with some future assassin.

Rather than argue against Summers I would modify his argument: language learning is a worthwhile activity, but it doesn't necessarily have to take place in a university setting. Self-teaching through various means is a viable option in many cases.

Is the point of a university education teaching students what they need to know to conduct business effectively? If we accept that as the purpose of a university, than I'm not sure how I would refute Summers's argument. I'm pretty sure, however, that we then have to start looking quite critically at a number of other departments -- I'm not sure how learning music theory, about feudal Japan, or about Freud help you do business, but I'm pretty sure they all have a place in the mission of a university.

I think learning a new language is a fantastic idea. I struggled with it in high school and never really tried again. Then I came across Berlitz and all of their helpful services. It really helped me learn a lot and showed me I could learn a language