they have platforms in their boots to make them look taller. all of them. the big show has been advertised up to 7'5'' back in wcw as the giant... now he is 7'2'' somehow. why? because their heights are all a bunch of ****.

so if kane looks nearly as tall as the big show but kane is really 6'9'' then the big show is probably really around 7'0'' not 7'2'' or whatever the hell they say.

wow, i bet you guys really believe yokozuna was 700 pounds too. sorry to tell you this, but the weight is also lied about too...

i dont know why you guys cant just accept their real size. they're still bigger than anyone you've ever seen walking down the street i bet. and even if someone matched their height, i bet he didnt have the same amount of musclemeat on him. they are still the biggest athletes in the world BY FAR.

I've met quite a few of them...

I used to go to just about every wrestling show, wcw or wwe, when i was in college. They came to NC alot, so I'd see quite a few shows and get good seats. Taker is about 6'8" or 6'9" and Kane is about an inch shorter or so. Kane sometimes uses boots with lifts depending on who he is in the ring with.
If you look back to old tapes you will see when he first arrived he was bigger than Taker, but in their last match taker was slightly larger.

Big Show is the biggest man I have ever seen in my life. I have a picture of him next to one of my friends from the wake forest basketball team and he dwarfs him. I'd say 7'1" or more easily. As for weight, if you don't think he weighs 450, you are smoking crack. Ronnie weighs 300 and Big show makes him look like Napolean Dynamite.

Oh, just to explain, we use the word pimp alot. You gotta understand what pimp means. We pimp iron here, see, so it's not the traditional pimp word. We pimp iron, we're iron pimpers. All right? Holla, Pg's, Pimp Guards for life. West side

undertaker is 6'6 in real life...when he was standing next to shaq shaw towered over him.....kane is about 6'6 and big show is about 6'9 he is huge so he looks of 7ft...

i read a non wrestling article years ago where it was reported that Paul Wight aka Big Show wasn't 7'2" but only 6'10.5" in height. hence, i can't comprehend Foley's claim. However, years ago they said Hogan was 6'8. well we all saw rodman (6'6") and karl Malone (6'9") put that claim of Hogan straight into the toilet. Now if Foley wants us to believe that UT is taller than Malone, then i reitierate, he took too many chairshots.

I am a Stunt Cock

Arsenal!!! the Gunners of Emirates Stadium!

"Viva La Raza" - Eddie Guerrero (1967-2005)

"They should make the ring 8-sides, put a red canvas on it, and write STOP really big in white letters. Then they should listen to the ring."- ricanarab (referring to TNA)

i read a non wrestling article years ago where it was reported that Paul Wight aka Big Show wasn't 7'2" but only 6'10.5" in height. hence, i can't comprehend Foley's claim. However, years ago they said Hogan was 6'8. well we all saw rodman (6'6") and karl Malone (6'9") put that claim of Hogan straight into the toilet. Now if Foley wants us to believe that UT is taller than Malone, then i reitierate, he took too many chairshots.

Well according to several sources, Paul is actually about 6'8.5"!

I would not have believed this until I talked to big Noah Steere, and he told me that he has met the Bigshow, and that The bigshow was only an inch or two taller than himself.

Sure enough, if you see videos of Hogan and Rodman, Rodman towers over Hogan.

Rodman looked about the same difference as the Undertaker and Hogan, maybe even Kevin Nash's height.

Also If the Bigshow is nothing over 6'8.5", then that would mean that Hogan would be about 6'3" or 6'4", tops. Then again, we are talking barefoot height. If you ever meet Hogan, I doubt he will be barefoot. You put a 6'4" guy in boots, and now he looks 6'6".

You put boots even WITHOUT lifts on a 6'8.5" guy and he is now easily 6'10", maybe even 6'11".

The WWE now lists the Bigshow at only 7 feet, NOT 7'2" anymore. It is pretty well known that they exaggerate heights.

When Noah was wrestling, he was being touted as 6'10" sometimes 7 feet, and about 380 pounds, and he will tell you he is 6'6" barefoot, just shy of 6'7".
When you put a 6'6" guy in wrestling boots he now "looks" 6'8" and who can really tell the difference between 6'8" and 6'10" unless you actually have a tape measure handy?

You can safely asume that pretty much every Pro Wrestler is exaggerated by at least 2 inches, and the really tall ones are often padded by about 4 inches.

Now if Paul Wight is really about 6'8" without shoes on, that would put guys like Kane, Sid, Undertaker, Nash, Matt morgan at about 6'5.5" - 6'6.5" barefoot. Keep in mind that shoes visualy add about 2 inches to these guys, and some even have lifts in them. Glen Jacobs AKA Kane has admited this before.

LOL, I remember when they used to anounce Paul Wight as 7'4" in his WCW days. They also used to say that Nash was 7'1" tall. Then in the WWE both guys just shrank 2 inches. They were anouncing Paul, now Bigshow at 7'2" and when Nash had his short return to the WWE after WCW was bought out by WWE, Nash was "only" 6'11". Well, if Paul is really exactly 6'8.5" barefoot, then the barefoot height of Nash would not be much over 6'6" because Paul has always visually TOWERED over Nash.

Nash and the Undertaker are about the same height, and so is Kane. Heck, for a while Glen Jacobs actually WAS the fake Diesel.

Re

Why do these same questions keep coming up?? I stood beside Undertaker at a mall signing and he was maybe 3-4 inches taller than me. I am 6"2. Don't forget they wear lifts in their shoes that give them about 2 more inches.

Why do these same questions keep coming up?? I stood beside Undertaker at a mall signing and he was maybe 3-4 inches taller than me. I am 6"2. Don't forget they wear lifts in their shoes that give them about 2 more inches.

Its an old thread been bumped, read my post above yours.

Behold the King, the King of Kings
All hail...
bow down to the, bow down to the King