Cliff Woolley wrote:
>I was going to make the same suggestion... my only other thought would be
>maybe instead of "Pointer size" have it say something a little more
>non-programmer-friendly, but since I'm a programmer, I don't know what
>that would be. =-) "Architecture"? (If so, it would be "%d-bit" rather
>than "%d bits".)
>
+1
--Brian