Suppes, P. (1969)Studies in the Methodology and Foundations
of Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer. [Papers: ‘A Comparison of the Meaning and
Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences’ and ‘Models of
Data’.]

Laymon, R. (1985)‘Idealizations
and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation’, in Observation Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science,
P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds), Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.

Laymon, R. (1985)‘Idealizations
and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation’, in Observation Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science,
P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds), Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.

* Grünbaum, A. (1966)‘The
Falsifiability of a Component of a Theoretical System’, in Feyerabend &
Maxwell (eds.) Mind, Matter and Method,
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Grünbaum, A. (1971) ‘Can we
ascertain the falsity of a scientific hypothesis?’, in Nagel, Bromberger and
Grünbaum (eds.) Observation and Theory in
Science, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, pp.69-129.

Ayer, A.J. (1957)‘The Conception
of Probability as a Logical Relation’ in Observation
and Interpretation: Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium of the Colston Research
Society, S. Körner (ed.), Butterworth: London.

* Gould, S. & Lewontin, R. (1979)‘The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian
paradigm - a critique of the adaptationist programme’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205, pp.581-598 [Repr.
in Sober (ed.) Conceptual Issues in
Evolutionary Biology.]

Bell, J.S. (1987)‘How
to teach special relativity’, in The
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 67-80.

Brown, H.R. (1993)‘Correspondence,
invariance and heuristics in the emergence of special
relativity’, in S. French and H. Kaminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics; Essays in Honour of Heinz
Post, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 227-260.

Brown, H. (1992)‘Bell's
other theorem and its connection with nonlocality. Part I’, in A. van der Merwe
et al. (eds.) Bell's Theorem and the
Foundations of Modern Physics, World Scientific, pp. 104-116.

Symons, D. (1992) ‘On
the Use and Misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behavior’, in Barkow,
Cosmides, and Tooby (eds) The Adapted
Mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Oxford: OUP.

Habermas, J. (1968)Knowledge and Human Interests, Appendix.
[Also see R. Bernstein (1976) The
Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, and T. McCarthy (1978) The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas,
Ch. 2.]

Hesse, M. (1978)‘Theory
and Value in the Social Sciences’ in C. Hookway and P. Pettit (eds.) Action and Interpretation, Cambridge:
CUP.

Martin, M. (1977)‘The
Philosophical Importance of the Rosenthal Effect’, J. for the Theory of Social Behavior 7. [Also in M&M.]