Sometimes we can't help but laugh at the way our little "Watchy"
goes off on tangents which s/he hopes will convince the reader that something is
wrong with those whom s/he opposes.

As but one example - The Jewish Press whine:

In early 2001, "Watchy" found an online 'book'
(not available in printed form, it appears) titled The
Rainbow Swastika (subtitled 'A Report to the Jewish People about New
Age Antisemitism' <sic>) by Hannah Newman. This work by someone who openly
admits that she has "...no academic degree even remotely related to this
field. No list of published books, teaching stints...." attempts to
link New Age beliefs (whatever they are) with anti-Semitism. Some of her work
focuses on Madame Blavatsky and the Theosophical Society which "Watchy"
wants desperately to believe are somehow intimately related to Freemasonry. With
breathless prose, a newsgroup message was posted heralding this work which
"Watchy" seemed to think was of great importance to the world. When we
read it, we found Ms. Newman's 'report' to prove that she had no academic degree
even remotely related nor did she have anything but a bunch of wild theories
thrown together in which she conveniently mixes Freemasonry with a bunch of
other groups but even then, she manages to throw in a back-handed and
parenthetical compliment: "[This would imply another reason
why Steiner and the Freemasons, as "humanitarian" strains of
occultism, were ruthlessly attacked by both Thulists and Nazis: they were
considered too compassionate to do what was needed to usher in the New
Age.]"

Now before we get too far afield in this
(succumbing to "Watchy's" standard modus operandi of 'diverting the
discourse'), let's focus on the current whine. In a reply to "Watchy's"
breathless prose about this, I replied that Ms. Newman's work was far from
definitive (something which should be readily apparent from her own bona fides)
and that I hadn't noticed this work receiving any attention in the Jewish Press.

"Watchy", who was roundly criticized for anti-Semitic
behavior in his other guise as 'St. John the Sublime Reformer', immediately
began ranting about my use of the words "Jewish press" and demanding
that I define exactly what "Jewish press" I was referring to.
There were strong intimations - and more than a couple of outright libelous
statements - that there was no such thing as a "Jewish press" and that
my suggestion that there might be anything of the kind to be somehow
anti-Semitic. Typically, however, these baseless charges
are a ruse. One need only have even a passing familiarity with Jewish life to
know that the 'Jewish Press' is a strong and vibrant part of the Jewish
community with the first Jewish newspaper being published in Amsterdam in the
1600s! Hundreds of websites are available (including, for example, the Institute
for the Study of the Jewish Press and Communications at Tel-Aviv University
and the listing of membership available at the American
Jewish Press Association which even includes Canadian Jewish Press members
for "Watchy's" benefit) to see just how ludicrous these claims of a
non-existent Jewish press really are. It's all just part and parcel of the web
of deceit fabricated to defame Freemasonry.... Sad, really!

Search this Site

Related Topics:

In addition,
don't miss these:

Just
click on "Prince, the Search Dog" to find things on our site. He's on every page
and he'll take you directly to our search form where you can see if we've
written about whatever it is you're interested in. Prince has a great memory; he
always remembers where things are!