In this Discussion

Do doubt there would of been a topic similar to this but last night made me wonder.

What's the positives and negatives for either technique? And can 'Do Nothing' lead to a Super-O?

For a while I've been trying to work contractions but it just never seems to work (aside possibly from PC muscles) - no sensations whatsoever. When doing nothing however, everything seems to go into automated control for building sensation. This morning however, I realised a similar thing can occur without the Aneros anyway - albeit isn't pleasurable per se.

The bottom line is "do what works for you". Yes, the super-O can be achieved with just relaxation. Dont feel that you should change your method just because others don't do it or you haven't read about it.

I make far more progress and experience dozens and dozens of p-waves with the "do nothing" method and letting contractions happen spontaniously, when I concentrate and do manual contractions my p-waves diminish drastically.

Walnut - good question. With my Helix, I tend to jut let things happen. With the Eupho, a little PC contraction can move it around to hit the right spot and really get things going. A lttle pressure seems more effective than a lot.

I do both depending on how I feel generally with great success both ways. I used to do the "do nothing" technique in most situations but now I feel I can deeply relax and loosen pretty easily so I will stay still and breathe for 10-15 mins then start contractions. The contractions will then loosen me more and start generating other contractions and it escalates from there. With the helix I will often use gentle sustained contractions and play with it like that (involuntaries will produce some really strong contractions however) while with the progasm I like to use stronger "contract-release" or strong sustained contractions - at points the prograsm gets verrrry mobile and is so nice :D . i treat the tempo similar to the helix though even subtler, the outer ball on the sphincter is awesome