Yesterday, I searched for my 16 December 2014 post about my bike being smashed up by a car of G4S on a Dutch language forum: [url]http://rechtenforum.nl/forum/thread/title/geldtransport+medewerkers+en+vuurwapens/t/42334/[/url]

On 31 October 2014, I parked my bike against a pole on the pavement (in my home town Amsterdam this is not unusual). A few minutes later the front wheel of my bike was demolished by a car of G4S driving on the pavement (this is usual behaviour for the money transport cars of G4S).

The car was parked some 30 meters away at the local Albert Heijn supermarket (for some money transport business).
I walked over there carrying my bike. I shouted at the driver that he had ruined my bike and had driven away. The driver responded by the intercom that he had destroyed my bike, because it was not in the bicycle rack and refused to speak further because I wasn’t “calm”.

Fifteen minutes later, I filed charges with the police, who refused to record this. Not very surprising, because the cops protect the big criminals…

On November 6, I wrote a letter to G4S, asking for compensation for my losses. Not very surprising, they didn’t even respond.
Theoretically I could start a court case to get some money, but the courts (like the cops) protect the big criminals. Even if I win, this would be a maximum compensation of something like 40 Euro to replace by wheel.

I thought that this is a very innocuous post.
I did a search with Google.nl, Yahoo.com, Duckduckgo.com, and Bing.com with the following key words: “[I]G4S fiets paal stoep Albert Heijn bestuurder aangifte politie aangetekende brief aansprakelijk onrechtmatige daad[/I]”.
Google finds my thread, but the others don’t.
See the screenprint of no results with Yahoo.
[IMG]https://s19.postimg.org/daj6hl5vn/Yahoo_blocks_Rechtenforum-1-8-2017.png[/IMG]

Since I bought my new rear wheel on 20 Januari 2017, my sabotaged saddle on 22 January, and the blow out of my rear tire on 9 March, I’ve didn’t have big problems with my bike (that’s almost 4 whole months without bike troubles worth mentioning…).

Then on 4 July, a spoke in my rear wheel broke off; on 7 July I had it fixed.
On 7 July (that’s the same day), another spoke broke; on 8 July got it fixed.
On 11 July (3 days later), another spoke broke; on 14 July it was fixed.
On 17 July (3 days later) another spoke broke, and on 18 July a second one.

Yesterday, I searched for my thread about the Dragon society: [url]http://letsrollforums.com//order-dragon-t32304.html[/url]
I did a search with Google.nl, Yahoo.com, Duckduckgo.com, and Bing.com with the following key words: “[I]Vatican Royal Dragon Families Jacob Rothschild Court City of London Australia Fiona Barnett Bohemian Grove White Dragon Society Eagle [/I]”.
This should find my thread, but doesn’t.

One of the strategies to keep my stories out of the internet search results, is by putting stories with similar keywords on the internet, see for example the following story by Judy Byington of the ICLCJ court, posted on 29 May and 6 June: [url]http://pn.i-uv.com/original-jurisdiction-republic-via-gcr/[/url]
The following words also appear in that story – [I]Vatican; Royal [B]Dragon[/B] Families (the word “dragon” appears very often); Nathan Mayer [B]Rothschild[/B] (the word “Rothschild” appears very often); Masonic; George Soros; [B]Court[/B] (the word “court” appears very often); Netherlands; Satanic (the word “Satanic” appears very often); Kennedy; City of London; Australia [B]Fiona Barnett[/B]; Indonesian President Sukarno; Bohemian Grove; Illuminati; Secret Society; Jacob Rothschild; [B]White Dragon Society[/B]; Eagle[/I].
The Byington story even pops up in the search results in connection with “[B]Lawfulpath.com[/B]”, where I’ve also posted my story on the Draconists, see the following link: [url]http://pn.i-uv.com/category/usa/[/url]

22 June 2012, Supreme Court ([I]Hoge Raad[/I]): [url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BW5695[/url]
This verdict consisted of unique jurisprudence. Since then the whole law on which this was based (the BBA) has been retracted...

Verdict of 12 June 2015, request denied to replace Judge Van Buitenen for conflict of interests, because she had worked with the head of Labour Affairs of ABN AMRO, Hansma, in a committee ([I]werkgroep[/I]) to replace the BBA law: [url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2015:6796[/url]

Verdict of 23 October 2015, request denied to replace Judge Marres for conflict of interests, because he worked for the same Delta Lloyd that sold insurances in a joint venture with ABN AMRO: [url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2015:8332[/url]

When I spoke to an attorney in 2015, he told me that I shouldn’t complain about all attorneys and judges knowing the corporate lawyers of the ABN AMRO, because: “[I]we all know each other[/I]”...

In short I was fired illegally in March 2004, but according to the Dutch law (at least in theory) a company can only fire somebody with a good reason…
This meant that in September 2014, ABN AMRO was ordered to pay me 10 years in salary.

Naturally I had to use every trick in the book to stop my own attorneys from stabbing me in the back. Including the biggest law firm in the Netherlands, De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek, that has represented ABN AMRO in some legal matters.
In November 2011 my (other) attorney, Christiaan Oberman, advised me to settle for something like 120,000 euro. He explained this deal with that I would have to pay taxes over that (the highest tax rates in the Netherlands are 52%), and from the remaining money would have to pay his salary and De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek.
These wonderful attorneys declared something like 35,000 euro for their copy/pasting/typing skills, which would have made my pay-out something like 25,000 euro net...

There are also 2 other verdicts by the Court of appeal ([I]Centrale Raad van Beroep[/I]) in which I was plaintiff, dated 19 May 2017.
In short I argued that the city of Amsterdam according to the Dutch legislation has the obligation to help me solve problems in getting a job. Notably the attempts to murder me and the not-anonimised publications that shows that I was locked up for half a year in a psychiatric hospital, because I’m oh so “dangerous”.
The corrupt judge simply ignored my complaints.
[url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:CRVB:2017:2160[/url]
[url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:CRVB:2017:2159[/url]

Firing me was part of outsourcing the department of ABN AMRO that I worked for to the Indian company TCS: [url]http://letsrollforums.com//showpost.php?p=270626&postcount=8[/url]
[quote=St Jimmy;270626]In 2002 plans were made to outsource the department of the ABN AMRO bank (in which both Rothschild and the Dutch Royal family owned a large share) for which I worked at the time, to Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) in India. The plan couldn’t fail: Indians receive less wages than the Dutch, and if ABN AMRO makes the same profit with less personnel the metrics improve (the company's profit per employee).
They could have won by doing this in a clean (legal) way, but they should have paid the 1500 Dutch employees they wanted to get rid off, more than a hundred of million euros.
In the summer of 2003 ABN AMRO replaced all the computers in the office where I worked and started the reorganisation “Inspiration” (based on CMM). Changing work processes under the guise of CMM was meant to keep everybody busy with useless activities, while we suddenly had to work in a different way (leading to burn-out mental diseases). The new computers acted strange.
In September 2003 they ordered me to work in 6 ICT-projects in 3 different functions simultaneously. Examples of harassments: stealing my wallet, middle fingers, throwing a cup of coffee over my clothes, toxic thea, yelling, intimidations, calling me names and a reprimand. In February 2004 I noticed that the office building was almost deserted. On March 1 I refused to go to work anymore and was fired. I have proof that ABN AMRO broke into my house in 2004 (also part of the reorganisation?).
On September 1, 2005 (when the reorganisation had already been finished) the outsourcing was made public: [url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4204174.stm[/url]
Labour unions, attorneys, journalists and judges were all cooperating with this ploy to get rid of employees.

The following conflicting interests, make it more interesting.
In 1989 Chatterjee with the help of Rothschildagent George Soros set up The (Soros-)Chatterjee Group (TCG). In 1994 The Chattarjee Group, Tata Group, Indian Oil Corporation and West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation founded the joint venture Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd (HPL): [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haldia_Petrochemicals[/url]
In 2004 Tata Consultancy Services was guided to the stock markets by JM Morgan Stanley, DSP Merrill Lynch and JP Morgan Chase. Member of Bilderberg Robert W. Scully was part of the direction of JM Morgan Stanley, together these 3 banks had some 30 members of the Council on Foreign Relations: [url]http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2004-06-10/news/27417686_1_public-issue-equity-shares-book-built-issue[/url]
In 2005 Chattarjee bought Basell, with the participation of Shell (also connected to both Rothschild and the Dutch Royal family) and Merrill Lynch: [url]http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2005-05-06/news/27472649_1_purnendu-chatterjee-dsp-merrill-lynch-basell-polyolefins[/url]
In December 2006 it became known that Tata Steel was counselled by NM Rothschild and ABN AMRO (!) in the acquisition of the British-Dutch Corus: [url]http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2006-12-13/news-by-company/27449549_1_csn-tata-steel-companhia-siderurgica-nacional[/url]
When in April 2013 Tata Technologies bought Cambric, not only Tata but also Cambric was advised by NM Rothschild (aren’t conflicting interests illegal?): [url]http://www.tata.com/media/releasesinside/chek0XG7M4s=/TLYVr3YPkMU=[/url]
There’s even a connection between Soros-Chatterjee, Winston Partners and Marvin Bush (younger brother of George W.): [url]http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/04-10-05/discussion.cgi.55.html[/url][/quote]

[quote=St Jimmy]Law firm 3, Cleerdin & Hamer - Represented me in January 2008. He pleaded that I must be locked up in a psychiatric hospital, because I’m dangerous because of a mental disorder. When I asked about representation to get damages from the police that had their dog take a few bites out of my leg, said that they didn’t have any attorney with this kind of expertise (Cleerdin & Hamer is one of the bigger law firms in the Netherlands).[/quote]
Specially requested by Truthissweet...

Here are 4 photos of the 4 scars on my legs from being attacked by police dogs on 1 January 2008.

The scar on the backside just above my left ankle (in a high fidelity photo you could see that this has left a hole).
[IMG]https://s19.postimg.org/th5y28v0j/Pic-_L-ankle-back.jpg[/IMG]

Two pictures of the 2 scars on the front just above my left ankle (you can see the black sock that I’ve pushed down for the photo).
[IMG]https://s19.postimg.org/51xq16w3n/Pic-_L-ankle-front-1.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://s19.postimg.org/ik4mdh88z/Pic-_L-ankle-front-2.jpg[/IMG]

The scar high on my right leg; this was the most painful of the dog bites and literally made me scream out (you can see the black underwear that I've pushed up for the photo). This wasn’t bleeding like the wounds on my right ankle, it remained red coloured for a long time, but has healed up nicely; only the white discolouring is visible.
[IMG]https://s19.postimg.org/yjn9x14ar/Pic-_R-_Upper_leg.jpg[/IMG]

One of the few things on the internet that I’m proud of, is that I’m co-author of the following article: [url]http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885397007312?via%3Dihub[/url]

I searched for my thread about the Destruction of Syria: [url]http://letsrollforums.com//destruction-syria-t32259.html[/url]
I did a search with the following key words: “[I]Syria bombs thrown civilians war crime unfortunate accident water supply Sarin Peter Ford Brussels pipelines Afek Rothschild Graham Fuller hammerlock Theodore Postol[/I]”.
This should find my thread, but doesn’t.

Since April 4, the Dutch language website Rechtenforum is unreachable. The threads that I had started on Rechtenforum, since November 2013, were viewed several hundreds of thousands of times.

This is the second forum that has been taken off the internet (besides Davidicke.com)
This was the link to one of my threads about the government stealing over 200,000 euros from me in taxes (with over 100,000 views): [url]http://rechtenforum.nl/forum/thread/title/Verjaring+belasting+t//m+2008/p/224917/[/url]

This time I specifically searched for threads started by others, which I’ve replied to, that are blacklisted by Google, Yahoo, Duckduckgo, and Bing.

I searched for my post of February 22 in the “DNA evidence” thread, started by GL69M: [url]http://letsrollforums.com//showpost.php?p=272582&postcount=77[/url]
When I replied the number of views was something like 4000, in only a couple of days this went to 8000 (on February 26), to 10,300 (on February 27), to 12,583 (on March 1). More than 1000 views a day...
Today (March 19) the amount of views for this thread is 12,789. That’s 206 views in 18 days.

I did a search with Google.nl, Yahoo.com, Duckduckgo.com, and Bing.com with the following key words: “[I]DNA September 11, 2001 complete lie 1594 2749 victims plant human remains Ground zero Hennessey administrative process negative identification Holland STR profiles loci Amplification Cash M-FISys program mtDNA protocols were invented[/I]”.
This should find that post on Letsrollforums.com as well as the similar threads I started on Ronpaulforums.com and Lawfulpath.com, but none of these threads is found by these search engines.

I also did a search for a thread started by Thunkerdrone, about the conspiracy theory that the Trilateral Commission rules the USA: [url]http://letsrollforums.com//barney-millertv-sitcom-pulled-t32169.html[/url]
I did a search with Google.nl, Yahoo.com, Duckduckgo.com, and Bing.com with the following key words: “[I]sitcom Barney Miller Dr. Strangelove Trilateral Commission 1981 ridiculing conspiracy theories Antony Sutton Patrick Wood[/I] “.
This should find that thread, but doesn’t.

I’ve again done a little internet search (with Google.nl and Yahoo.com) for some of “my” threads; ironically now that the Davidicke.com forum is off the internet, some of those threads pop-up.

When I search for “[I]quarter prisoners world locked up United States more African American men prison provisional release black slaves 1850 civil war prohibiting drugs Texas Three Strikes law slave labour company Unicor[/I]”; it doesn’t find my thread on Amount of US prisoners: [url]http://letsrollforums.com//mass-incarceration-slavery-t32167.html[/url]
It also doesn’t find my similar thread on Ronpaulforums.

Google and Yahoo block my threads

There are a lot more of my threads that are simply blocked by Google.nl and Yahoo.com - not only on Letsrollforums.com, but also on Davidicke.com.
DO NOT READ MY POSTS, IF YOU DON’T WANT TO KNOW SECRET INFORMATION.

Google blocks Letsrollforums.com

[FONT=&quot]Most people in the “civilised” world know that in totalitarian states like China and Iran the internet is censored.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Regularly when I post information on forums my profile gets blocked and threads are removed...[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]I’ve started 3 threads on the following topics right here on Letsrollforums.com: 1) AIDS/HIV hoax; 2) 9/11 was an inside job; 3) Gulf of Mexico oil disaster of 2010.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]These threads contain hard evidence on genocide; none of them pop-up in the search results from Google.nl.[/FONT]

Censorship – Ron & Rand Paul, David Icke

Once again one of “my” threads has been removed from ronpaulforums.com and placed in the members only “Hot topics”; so I decided to put the corrupt Ron Paul (Texas representative from 1976-1977, 1979-1985 and 1997-2013) and son Rand Paul (Kentucky Senator from 2011 till now) in the spotlight.

LIBERTARIAN – JOHN BIRCH, TEA PARTY
The family Paul calls their flavour of politrics not Democrat/Republican, but “Libertarian”. I won’t try to explain how all of these names for politrics don’t mean a thing.
Both Ron and Rand Paul are strongly affiliated with the Libertarian movement. Libertarianism is an offshoot of the John Birch society that was founded in 1958 as an opponent to Communism. Fred C. Koch (founder of Koch industries) was among its founding members: [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society[/url]
Rand Paul and Ron Paul are also members of the Tea party of the brothers Koch (the owners of Koch industries). In November 2010, Joshua Green described Paul as the tea party's "intellectual godfather": [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_politicians_affiliated_with_the_Tea_Party_movement[/url]
Here’s Ron Paul addressing the Tea party patriots.
[IMG]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d0/Ron_Paul_at_Tea_Party_Patriots.jpg/300px-Ron_Paul_at_Tea_Party_Patriots.jpg[/IMG]

KOCH INDUSTRIES – GREG PALAST
Charles and David Koch are the sons of Fred Koch, who ironically made his fortune in the communist Soviet Union, who effectively own Koch industries.
According to Palast Koch industries practically owns the Republican Party; see the following excerpts from Greg Palast’s great 2002 book “The Best democracy money can buy”: [url]http://www.chemtrails911.com/books/The%20Best%20Democracy%20Money%20Can%20Buy%20by%20Greg%20Palast%20.pdf[/url]
“[I]Koch Industries is the biggest company you’ve never heard of—and their owners like it that way. Estimates of its annual turnover, at $35 billion a year, make it bigger than Microsoft or Boeing Aircraft. We can only estimate because Koch [pronounced “coke” like the cola] is a private corporation, second largest in the US. David and Charles Koch, who own nearly all of it, are reported to have a combined net worth of $4 billion.
The Koch clan’s fortune originated in Russia where daddy Fred Koch built oil refineries for Stalin’s regime. In 1946, Koch returned from the Soviet Union to Wichita, Kansas, and founded the ultra-right John Birch Society. David and Charles have rejected their father’s politics, preferring to back ultra-ultra rightwing causes. In 1980, as a Libertarian Party candidate, David campaigned against Ronald Reagan.
(…)
Passage of the legislation depended upon the Republicans holding their majority in Congress. In the 1996 election cycle, Republican control was in jeopardy. Crucial to their ultimate narrow victory in that campaign was a multi-million dollar television advertising blitz in key districts paid for by the Coalition for Our Children’s Future, a registered charity. The action was extraordinary for a child protection society—as was their choice of candidates to assist, Only weeks before CCF purchased the adverts, every one of the incumbent congressmen they helped, all Republicans, voted to abolish food stamps for children of the poor.
The politicians supported by the “Children’s” fund had something in common besides an antipathy to free meals for youngsters. Their districts contained Koch operations.[/I]”

PETER THIEL
Billionaire Peter Thiel is a huge sponsor of both Ron and Rand Paul.
In 2011 Thiel was the biggest donor to the Ron Paul super PAC “Endorse liberty” with a whopping $900,000: [url]http://www.cbsnews.com/news/super-pacs-reveal-big-donors/[/url]
Here’s a video where Rand Paul is asked about the Bilderberg group (of which Thiel is a member) and answers that he only knows what he heard from Alex Jones: [url]https://youtu.be/k9sctUOlOw8[/url]
Peter Thiel was also a major contributor to Donald Trump’s successful presidential campaign. More interesting is his support for human blood drinking. In the 21st century drinking blood by the elite isn’t called vampirism, but parabiosis (which sounds almost scientific and medical): [url]http://www.inc.com/jeff-bercovici/peter-thiel-young-blood.html[/url]
I think it’s out of the question that Peter Thiel supports any politician that is against blood drinking, while this also confirms that Bilderberg members are vampires

RAND PAUL – EXXON, BP
Now I finally get to the most damaging facts to explain why my thread on the BP oil disaster has been removed from the Ron Paul forum. Rand Paul is on the take from the oil corporation (Koch has high stakes in oil). Why else would he defend ExxonMobil and BP?
In August 2012 Rand Paul strongly advised President Obama to not punish Exxon (that played a part in this oil disaster), because when punishing “[I]the rich, the jobs that are lost are those of the poor and middle class[/I]”.
Rand Paul even pledged his support for the Keystone pipeline “[I]When you block the Keystone Pipeline, you punish the welder who works on the pipeline[/I]”: [url]http://grist.org/politics/mr-rand-paul-wants-you-to-be-nice-to-mr-exxon-mobil/[/url]
Here’s a story by Greg Palast (him again) that explains how the Keystone pipeline is destined to stab the US people in the back to make the brothers Koch even richer: [url]https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/koch-brothers-hugo-chavez-and-the-xl-pipeline[/url]

Then it gets even better.
Rand Paul actually defended BP after President Obama dared to criticise BP for the 2010 oil disaster! Rand Paul actually said that it was an unfortunate accident "[I]And I think it's part of this sort of blame-game society in the sense that it's always got to be somebody's fault instead of the fact that maybe sometimes accidents happen[/I]": [url]http://www.nbcnews.com/id/37273085/ns/politics-decision_2010/t/rand-paul-obama-bp-criticism-un-american/[/url]
Surely an “accident” sounds much better than premeditated...! And we really don’t want to punish the rich for their (corporate) crimes, do we?

BLOCKED ON INTERNETFORUMS
I’ve already wrote earlier about being blocked on the David Icke forum: [url]http://letsrollforums.com//showpost.php?p=271790&postcount=5[/url]
In April 2012 I went to the local office of Amnesty International (in Amsterdam) for help. Amnesty told me that they don´t provide any help for the “type” of human rights violations I described and advised me to put information on the internet.
Since then I´ve put some texts on several internet forums. Most of my texts have been removed. All of the following forums have removed information and/or blocked my profile:
rechtenforum.nl, radartv.nl, eerstehulpbijrecht.nl, ouders.nl, indymedia.nl, viva.nl, schulden-vrij.info, denk.onsgeld.nu, internationalskeptics.com, projectavalon.net, educationforum.ipbhost.com, thefreedictionary.com, davidicke.com, madinamerica.com, thescienceforum.com, secure.gn.apc.org, rationalskepticism.org, ronpaulforums.com.

The only forums that allowed me to place information without problems are: lawfulpath.com and letsrollforums.com

Last January 20 - again - I bought a new rear wheel for my bike (my 6th since I bought this bike in 2008).
Yesterday (January 22) my saddle was – again – sabotaged, which almost caused me to fall off my bike. While a broken saddle is more dangerous than a sabotaged rear wheel, it’s fortunately easier and cheaper to replace; today I got a new one.

Rainbow and 3D

One of the strangest things about the human brain is that it can be used as an antenna for radiosignals.
Besides voices in head, it can also make you “see” things. Here’s a report from 1968 about an experiment where pigeons got visual input in their eye - Siegel “A Device for Chronically Controlled Visual Input”: [url]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1338526/pdf/jeabehav00153-0059.pdf[/url]

One of the known visual illusions is (seeing) a “rainbow”, which is already described in the Tenach (Old Testament) - Ezekiel 1, 28:
“[I]As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the LORD. And when I saw it, I fell upon my face, and I heard a voice of one that spake.[/I]”

I do not know what “bow” in the clouds when it rains this is supposed to be. This description is obviously not the rainbow we are made to believe in. There is no mentioning of the sun (at the time of the rain) or the diffracted colours and the rainbow I have “seen” is not “in the cloud”, but is more like a coloured arch on the ground at a distance of less than a mile.
There are a number of paintings of a rainbow from the 19th century, by artists influenced by Christianity. Where are the paintings of the old Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Chinese, Indians and Native Americans of the rainbow?
These paintings are obviously not the same as the rainbow we “see”, but fantasy. See for example Koch - Noah's Thank Offering (c. 1803) where the rainbow is in the cloud, where we “see” a rainbow on the ground
[IMG]http://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/download/file.php?id=314[/IMG]

When light travels from one medium (like air) to another medium (like glass or water), the direction is changed (refraction). Light of different colours (wavelengths) are refracted in a different direction, leading to diffraction. You can see this effect for example with a prism, where at the edges of the seen object the diffracted colours (of the rainbow) appear. Millions of raindrops do not diffract the light of the sun, but only dim the sunlight. Even if rain would cause diffraction, this would not be seen as the rainbow we are made to believe in. If this could be the result of the rain, we would see the diffracted colours at the edge of the sun. Theoretically this could lead to a (rainbow) coloured ring around the sun, but NOT the rainbow we “see” as a coloured arch on the ground.

I have still never seen a “shooting star”.
I never “saw” a rainbow before I was in my mid-twenties in the 1990s.
The first time I saw a 3D-movie when was something like 10 years old, maybe this was in 1984. I put on a stupid pair of coloured glasses and saw a flat screen with part of the same image in red and the other in a green colour – no 3D-effect.
The next time I saw a 3D-movie was in 1998 in Disneyworld California. This time I definitely got the 3D-effect. After the 30 miniute movie my eyes felt worse than after staring at a computerscreen for 9 hours (that was actually my working time at the time).
This 3D-effect was not caused by the movie on the screen but by vision-2-skull technology.

The following quote is from the Nineteen eighty-four of George Orwell:
“[I]'But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach for ever.'
'What are the stars?' said O'Brien indifferently. 'They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.'
Winston made another convulsive movement. This time he did not say anything. O'Brien continued as though answering a spoken objection:
'For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometres away. But what of it? Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that? Have you forgotten doublethink?'[/I]”

When they control what we see and hear, they can make us see things that aren’t there.
Maybe some of the witnesses of 9/11 really did “see” and “hear” planes.

Confiscation lifted

After careful examination of the Dutch law I found out that one month after the bailiff of attorney Eisenberger sent me the court order (October 31); the confiscation is lifted (art. 722 Rv).
On November 16 I asked the court to send me the (original) of the decision of the court that I never received; which I (finally) received on November 26. On December 5 I sent the original legal documents to a bailiff with the request to sign this and send it to Rabobank (betekenen).

On December 6 suddenly the bailiff of attorney Eisenberger sent me a mail that he would take the more than 7000 euro (for 1 letter) in accordance with the court order, which would lift the confiscation of the rest of my savings.
I should have done this earlier. Last December 16 I checked my accounts with “internet banking” and found out that since December 7 I can use my own savings (with more than 200,000 euro) again. I surely got some attention by asking at the bank office how to transfer 200,000 euro as the transaction limit is only 50,000 euro...