FAMILY LAW MEETS ATTACHMENT
SCIENCE CONFERENCE:
MAKING BETTER DECISIONS FOR CHILDREN
HOUSE OF COMMONS, LONDON
SEPTEMBER 25, 2014
RECENT DISCOVERIES IN DEVELOPMENTAL
NEUROSCIENCE:
LEGAL AND POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS
ALLAN N. SCHORE
UCLA DAVID GEFFEN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
• Leckman and March, Developmental neuroscience
comes of age, J. Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
2011: Describe “the phenomenal progress of the
past three decades in the developmental
neurosciences.”
• “Over the past decade it has…become abundantly
clear that…the dyadic relations between child and
caregivers within the first years of life can have
direct and enduring effects on the child’s brain
development and behavior.”
• “The enduring impact of early maternal care and
the role of epigenetic modifications of the genome
during critical periods in early brain development
in health and disease is likely to be one of the
most important discoveries in all of science that
have major implications for our field.”
• Brain development not just genetically encoded;
needs epigenetic social experiences. Not one or other
but gene-environment interactions, mother nature
and mother nurture combine to shape human
nature.
• Here briefly review my ongoing work in developmental
neuroscience and attachment theory, then offer
implications for family law and policy.
• Schore (Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self,
1994): interpersonal neurobiological model of
attachment. Integrate early child development and
brain development to emotional development.
• J. Schore & A. Schore (Modern attachment theory:
The central role of affect regulation in development
and treatment, Clinical Social Work J., 2008):
• “We suggest that in line with Bowlby’s fundamental
goal of the integration of psychological and
biological models of human development, the
current clinical and experimental focus on how
affective bodily-based processes are nonconsciously
interactively regulated…has shifted attachment
theory to a regulation theory.”
• Schore (Science of the Art of Psychotherapy, 2012):
• “Attachment theory, first created by…John Bowlby
over 50 years ago, is now revitalized, particularly
by its deep connections with neuroscience. At this
point in time, we have in attachment theory a coherent
theory of development that is grounded in both
psychological science and neuroscience, and thereby
is on a much firmer ground than it used to be.”
• Schore (1994-2014): interpersonal neurobiological
model of attachment mechanism; relational, socialemotional attachment experiences shape
developing “social,” emotional” right brain and
thereby emotional well-being in later stages of life.
• Schore (Science of the Art of Psychotherapy, 2012):
• “There is now agreement…that the essential task of
the 1st year of human life is the co-creation of a
secure attachment bond of emotional
communication between the infant and his/her
primary caregiver.
• The baby communicates its burgeoning positive
emotional states (e.g., joy, excitement) and negative
emotional states (e.g., fear, anger) to the caregiver so
that she can then regulate them.
• The attachment relationship shapes the ability of the
baby to communicate with not just the mother, but
ultimately with other human beings.”
• Bowlby (1969): mother-infant attachment
communications are “accompanied by the strongest
of feelings and emotions, and occur within a context
of facial expression, posture, tone of voice…”
• Bowlby (1991): “Emotion is nonverbal
communication of basic but very powerful attitudes in
mind and potential action.”
• Schore (1994): in episodes of right brain-to-right
brain visual-facial, auditory-prosodic, and tactilegestural emotional transactions, sensitive attuned
primary caregiver is receptive to infant’s bodilybased nonverbal attachment communications.
• Attachment emotional facial communications between
infant’s right brain and mother’s right brain.
• Infant: “The right hemisphere can be considered
dominant in infancy, for the type of visual and
acoustic communication which is relevant for the
prelinguistic child.” (Brown and Jaffe,
Neuropsychologia, 1975).
• Adult: “The neural substrates of the perception of
voices, faces, gestures, smells, and pheromones,
as evidenced by modern neuroimaging techniques,
are characterized by a general right-hemispheric
functional asymmetry” (Brancucci et al., Proc. Royal
Soc. London B, 2009).
“Life began with waking up and loving my
mother’s face”
George Eliot
• Mother not only receives infant’s right brain emotional
communications, but then interactively regulates them.
• Attachment = interactive regulation of emotion.
• Baby becomes securely attached to psychobiologically attuned caregiver who minimizes
negative affect (e.g., fear, in soothing) and
maximizes positive affect (e.g.,joy, in play).
• “It is the emotional availability of the caregiver in
intimacy which seems to be the most central growthpromoting feature of the early rearing experience.”
• Winnicott (1986): “The main thing is a communication between the baby and the mother in terms
of the anatomy and physiology of live bodies.”
• Ovtscharoff & Braun (Neuroscience, 2001):
• “The regulatory function of the newborn-mother
interaction may be an essential promoter to
ensure the normal development and maintenance
of synaptic connections during the establishment
of functional brain circuits.”
• Human brain growth spurt. Brain doubles size 1st year.
• Lagercrantz & Ringstedt (2001): prenatal and
postnatal periods rate of synaptogenesis estimated at
40,000 new synapses every second.
• Schore (1996): “The self-organization of the
developing brain occurs in the context of a
relationship with another self, another brain.”
• Schore (1994): infant’s early developing right brain
circuits are shaped by attachment experiences.
• Minagawa-Kawai (Cerebral Cortex, 2009): nearinfrared spectroscopy study of infant-mother
attachment, “our results are in agreement with that
of Schore (2000) who addressed the importance of
the right hemisphere in the attachment system.”
• Ratnarajah et al. (NeuroImage, 2013): [I]n early life
the right cerebral hemisphere could be better able
to process…emotion (Schore, 2000; Wada and
Davis, 1977). …These neural substrates function
as hubs in the right hemisphere for emotion
processes and mother and child interaction.”
• Schore (1994): subsequent to child’s attachment to
mother in 1st year, forms another to father in 2nd
• Herzog (2001): “The biorhythmicity of man with infant
and woman with infant” affords infant to have
“interactive, state-sharing, and state-attuning
experiences with two different kinds of
caregivers.”
• Schore (2003): father later critically involved in
male and female toddler’s aggression regulation
[vs. earlier mother and fear regulation]
• Braun’s laboratory in Germany (2006): paternal care
affects synapse formation of the developing brain.
• Abraham et al., Father’s brain is sensitive to child
care experiences. PNAS USA, 2014.
• Study parental brain response to infant stimuli using
fMRI. Measure “primary caregiving” mothers and
“secondary caregiving fathers.” Mean age of
infants – 11 months.
• Describe a “parenting caregiving” expressed in two
different brain systems: “subcortical-paralimbic
structures implicated in emotional processing and
cortical areas involved in social understanding.
Mothers showed greater activation in the
emotional processing network and fathers in the
social cognitive circuits.”
• Schore (1994): attachment source of right brain
functions of emotional well-being over life span.
• Sullivan & Dufresne (2006): “right hemispheric
specialization in regulating stress - and emotionrelated processes.”
• Decety & Chaminade (2003): “Mental states that are
in essence private to the self may be shared
between individuals... self-awareness, empathy,
identification with others, and more generally
intersubjective processes, are largely dependent
upon...right hemisphere resources, which are the
first to develop.”
• Schutz (2005): “The right hemisphere operates a
distributed network for rapid responding to danger
and other urgent problems. It preferentially
processes environmental challenge, stress and
pain and manages self-protective responses such
as avoidance and escape.”
• Hecht (2014): “[T]he right hemisphere has a relative
advantage over the left hemisphere mediating social
intelligence – identifying social stimuli,
understanding the intentions of other people,
awareness of the dynamics in social relationships,
and successful handling of social interactions.”
• Schore (2012) models of psychopathogenesis:
“Essentially, interpersonal neurobiology explains
how early social-emotional experience indelibly
influences later experience—by impacting and
altering the developing brain…The emotional
relational environment provided by the primary
caregiver shapes, for better or worse, the
experience-dependent maturation of the brain systems
involved in attachment functions that are accessed
throughout the life span.”
• Best current description of path of infant brain
development is that it is “malleable” (not “resilient”).
• Knickmeyer et al. (J. Neuroscience, 2008):
“The large increase in total brain volume in the first
year of life suggests that this is a critical period in
which disruption of developmental processes, as
the result of innate genetic abnormalities or as a
consequence of environmental insults, may have
long-lasting or permanent effects on brain structure
and function…the first year of life may be a period of
developmental vulnerability…”
• Infants-toddlers have unique social emotional
needs that are dependent on attachment. Critical
role in later right brain emotional well-being.
• Implications of modern attachment theory and
developmental neuroscience for family law
• Schore & McIntosh. (2011). Family law and the
neuroscience of attachment, Family Court Review.
• Interpersonal neurobiological perspective of modern
attachment theory used to address family law
decision about divorce in the first year directed
towards “the best interest of the child.”
• Pruett, McIntosh, & Kelly. (2014). Parental separation
and overnight care of young children: Consensus
through theoretical and empirical integration: Part
l. Family Court Review.
• Describe “broad eras within the first 3 years; “the
first 18 months of life, the second eighteen months
of life (18-36 months), and year of being three” (3-4)
• Work of developmental neuroscience described
previously primarily on the first year and earlier:
prenatal, perinatal and postnatal periods of infancy.
• Emotional communications of primary attachment
relationship indelibly impact infant brain
development during human brain growth spurt from
last trimester pregnancy through 18-24 months.
• Key point: The rapidly developing brain of an
infant is quantitatively and qualitatively different
from not only adults but 3-4 year old children.
• 0-18 months, period of attachment, also critical
period of right brain maturation.
• Schore (1994): mother-infant right brain-to-right
brain attachment experiences shape maturation of
infant’s developing right brain.
• Howard & Reggia (Brain and Cognition, 2007):
“Earlier maturation of the right hemisphere is
supported by both anatomical and imaging evidence.”
• Chiron et al. (Brain, 1997): “The right brain
hemisphere is dominant in human infants.”
• Allman et al. (Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2005):
“The strong and consistent predominance for the
right hemisphere emerges postnatally.”
• Enormous body of research over numerous
scientific and clinical disciplines (pediatrics, child
psychiatry, developmental psychology etc.) also
highlights centrality of mother-infant relationship
to later social-emotional functions.
• Both attachment researchers and clinicians, as well as
neuroscience uses the term “primary caregiver,”
equating term with mother.
• Key point: separation from primary attachment
object, mother in first year is qualitatively different
from separation at 3-4, and from separation with
father in first year. Research show long-term
neurobiological effects of separation are
profound.
• Parallel studies in developmental neuroscience
indicate critical role of mother on infant brain
development. Only handful of studies on father,
who impacts different, later forming areas than
mother.
• Separations from mother and father in first year not
equivalent in terms of impact on social/emotional
development. Essential communications - mother’s
right brain and infant’s developing right brain.
• Key point: Developmental neuroscience can offer
“evidence-based” information on infant separation
in overnight care policy. Modern attachment theory
offers pragmatic model of both neurobiological and
psychological “best interest of the infant.”
• Few studies on specifically overnight separations
in infancy vs. 3-4 years.
• Solomon and George (1999): 12 and 30 months,
regular overnight arrangements, one night per week.
Report greater propensity for anxious, unsettled
behavior on reunion with primary caregiver in regular
overnight group of infants, and a greater propensity
for the development of insecure and disorganized
attachment with the caregiver by age 30 months.
• Tornello et al. (2013): 1 vs. 3 year olds. More
frequent overnights were significantly associated
with attachment insecurity among infants.
• Most relevant current research on overnights
integrates modern attachment theory and
developmental neuroscience.
• McIntosh et al, Overnight care patterns following
parental separation: Associations with emotion
regulation in infants and young children. Journal of
Family Studies, 2013.
• Studies 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 year old groups.
• “Developmental studies have linked prolonged
and/or frequent separation from primary caregiver
with increased potential for emotional
disorganization.”
• In addition to psychological studies “the field of
interpersonal neurobiology suggests a neurodevelopmental vulnerability of infants in the first
year of life to prolonged separation and
unpredictable care.”
• Findings: “Greater number of shared overnight
stays for the 0-1 year old and 2-3 year old groups
predicted less settled and poorly regulated
behaviours, but none for the 4-5 year old group.”
• Body of evidence now suggests a “dys-regulating
influence for the infant of repeated, lengthy or
unpredictable absence from a primary-caregiver,
despite being in the after care of others.”
• Divorce in first year is both a significant
psychological and biological stressor to all infants
• Now well established that stress, especially
interpersonal stress between mother and infant
impacts specifically right brain growth in critical
periods of first year, with long term consequences
on emotion and social development over life span.
• Overnight care patterns, which include
separations from primary caregiver are an
attachment stressor for infants that negatively
impacts the developing right brain, which for rest
of lifespan is dominant for processing stress.
• Schore & McIntosh (2011): “Any type of human
behavior which opposes the way that wellregulated biological systems optimally function
should be viewed as interfering with and not
promoting the psychological and biological
development of the infant.”
• Conclusion: recent developmental neuroscience on
the right brain and attachment now suggests negative
impact of shared-time parenting arrangement
following separation and parental overnights in
first (and second) year, when brain doubles in
size. Family Law policy about infants needs to
incorporate this recent knowledge.
• Broader cultural and political implications:
• Schore, Infant Mental Health Journal, 2001:
• “The earliest stages of humanhood are critical
because they contain within them the representation
of our possible futures – they model the potential
developmental extension of our individual and
collective identities…When and where shall we place
our current resources so as to optimize the future of
human societies?...How much should we value the
very beginnings of human life, in tangible social
program dollars.”
• UNICEF report, “Child Well-Being in Rich Countries,
2013: (UK 16/29; 2007 21/21; US 26/29)
• “It is perhaps no longer necessary to argue the case
for the importance of the early years. Advances in
both neuroscience and social science have
repeatedly confirmed that it is at this time that genetic
potential interacts in infinitely complex ways with early
experience to construct the neural pathways and
connections that quickly become both the foundations
and the scaffolding for all later development.”
• “It is therefore at this time that the child’s
wellbeing, health and development are most in
need of society’s concern and protection.”
• Science weighs in: Archives of Diseases of
Childhood, 2014, “Disproportionate disadvantage
of the young: Britain, the UNICEF report on child
well-being, and political choices,” I. Wolfe.
• “We are at a pivotal moment in UK child health, when
recent gains are likely to be lost. The Unicef report
strikes right to the heart of a defining question for our
times: what is the duty of the State in protecting
and providing the best conditions for nurturing
our children? Government policy can foster or
hinder children’s health, development and wellbeing.”
• Science, July 20, 2014: Editorial, “A focus on child
development,” K.L. Silver & P.A. Singer (Canada).
• Speak to role of the policy goals of the United Nations.
• “Investing in child development is the foundation
for improved health, economic, and social
outcomes. Not getting the early years ‘right’ is linked
to violent behavior, depression, higher rates of
noncommunicable disease, and lower wages, and it
negatively affects a nation’s gross domestic product.”
• Emphasis on child development “would put the focus
where it belongs: on the end beneficiary, the child,
and her or his potential for development.”
• Refer to “the fundamental importance of early child
development to overall sustainable development.”
• “Recent advances in neuroscience indicate the
importance of healthy brain development in the
early years to human capital formation…A society
only reaps the full benefits of a child’s survival if that
child becomes a productive individual as an adult.”
• “An increase in thriving children over the next 15 years
would lay a stronger foundation for healthy,
prosperous, and peaceful societies.”
• “Healthy brain development” = enduring effects of
optimal right brain development, secure attachment,
and relational origins of emotional well-being.