Categories

Meta

Month: June 2016

On April 6, 2009, according to President Barack Obama, “The United States is not and will never be at war with Islam.” He believes, “Islam is a religion that preaches peace.” For an educated man, Obama has had a poor schooling of the history of Islam. He appears to be unaware that after the death of Muhammad in 632 CE, in only 29 years, the fifth Muslim leader, Muawiya ruled a Muslim empire that extended over an enormous territory, stretching from India to Spain.

The first caliph had been concerned only with spreading Islam among the Arabs in Saudi Arabia. Motivated by power and wealth, by 750 CE, the Muslim leaders forced conversion to Islam in all conquered territories by presenting two alternatives: death by the sword or pay a tax. The Islamic Empire extended from the Byzantine and Persian empires, and continued along the Mediterranean as far west as Spain and all of North Africa, including its east coast down to the island Madagascar, and further east to the northern half of India.

The history of Islam verifies that it is a religion that has grown by taking the wealth of other countries, will not tolerate the existence of other religions, and forced conversion to Islam not through peace and love but by the choice of death or pay a tax to survive. History and events in our current world reveals that Islam is not a religion of peace.

All Muslims are taught the Qur’an, which is implemented by Sharia law. The Qur’an has many passages that incite: bigotry against Jews, Christians and other religious groups; hatred for those who worship a god other than Allah; violence and murder of those who slander the prophet Muhammad, and the murder of apostates, homosexuals, or are of another faith. A brief history of Islam and many passages in the Qur’an that cause Muslims to hate and kill people of other religions is provided in Allah, We Our and Uspublished by Hancock Press. It describes how Muslims are taught to believe they have the only true religion and that Islam will prevail over all other religions. In light of the history of Islam and the abominable passages in the Qur’an, we must question why does Obama publically proclaim Islam is a religion of peace?

The unrealistic belief by Obama that Islam preaches peace may be due to his indoctrination of the Qur’an. As a young boy in Jakata, Indonesia, he was registered as a Muslim in elementary school and was taught daily to read and write in Arabic, read and recite the Qur’an, and study the laws of Islam. This early indoctrination has greatly influenced his affinity for Islam and the Muslim people.

Only two weeks after the Benghazi attack in Libya, on September 25, 2012, Obama announced at the UN General Assembly,

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

This threat at an international forum warns all countries that their future is in jeopardy if the prophet of Islam is slandered. Is Obama truly a Christian when he strongly supports an Islamic prophet knowing hundreds of thousands of Christians have been killed by Islamic extremists? It would be expected that a Muslim leader would have made such a pronouncement. It is unconscionable that Obama, a United States President, would issue a threat to all countries on behalf of an Islam prophet.

A lack of Islamic history and Obama’s early indoctrination of the Qur’an may be reason for his arrogance to proclaim Islam is a religion of peace. Such arrogance may explain why he initiated the Obama-Iran Nuclear Deal, which infuses 150 billion dollars into Iran’s economy and allows them to pursue development of a nuclear bomb. This deal was negotiated while Iranian leaders and Muslims chanted, “Death to America and Death to Israel!!” Does Obama care about the security of the United States or the growth of Iran and the acceptance of an Islamic ideology by Americans?

According to Obama, “The United States is not and will never be at war with Islam.” However, WWIII will become a reality by the incessant advance of an Islamic cancer that has already destroyed cities in many countries. Two of many verses in the Qur’an, clearly show how the minds of Muslims are indoctrinated to kill those who do not follow Islam:

Sura 7:5-7: Little is it that you heed. How many a town have We destroyed! Our punishment came upon their dwellers by night or while they slept at noon. When Our punishment came upon them all they could utter was: We are indeed wrongdoers.

Sura 7:97-100:We afflicted them suddenly with chastisement, while they perceived not the cause thereof. If the people of those towns had believed and been righteous, We would surely have bestowed blessings upon them from heaven and earth, but they rejected the Prophets, so We seized them because of that which they did.

War will commence after Iran and militant Islamic extremists have grown to such an extent by aggressive force that many free-loving countries will have to defend their people and land by fighting back. The U.S and its allies will, out of necessity, fight those countries supporting Islamic terror because they will have no alternative.

In addition to the U.S., Israel, Germany, France, Canada, Spain, Australia, Russia, China, United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, Finland, Bulgaria, and even Egypt and Jordan may become part of the coalition force to combat Islamic aggression. Many countries have already felt the threat and loss of their sovereignty as Muslims migrate into their lands and refuse to integrate and accept their laws and cultural values. This outcome has been documented in the October 2015 publication of Obama, Islam and Benghazi.

Islam Ideology may cause World War III.

War is the alternative if Islamic religious and political leaders do not acknowledge that it is their ideology taught from The Qur’an and implemented with Sharia law that must be revised. No scripture should exist that teaches it is the only true religion, the religion of truth, and will prevail over all religions (Qur’an 9:29 and 9:33).

Islam will never be a peaceful nation as it is bound by The Qur’an and Sharia law to spread its ideology to all people. Americans are ignorant of what the Qur’an actually contains. It is a manual used by religious leaders to indoctrinate Muslims to commit bigotry, hate, violence, and the killing of innocent people who do not believe in Islam.

People in America and many countries need to learn why Muslims will never assimilate the cultural values of another country. They need to learn how Islam grew to be a Theocratic Empire by 750 CE through use of the sword and not by love and respect for the beliefs of other people. Only by reading Iran’s history will people understand Islam’s despicable past and its objective for world domination. Figure 1 illustrates the effect of an ideology that transforms people to advocate Islam will dominate the world.

Figure 1. Islamic terrorists advocate Islam will Dominate the World.

An opportunity exists for people to benefit from the knowledge scholars have provided by their objective critique of The Qur’an. A good recommendation is to read Obama, Islam and Benghazi, which may be read as a free read on the following website:

Obama, Islam and Benghazi describes why Obama has a strong affinity for Islam and the Muslim people; provides a history why Islam is the source of discontent in many countries; reveals portions of the Qur’an that incite terror and violence; describes how Muslims are indoctrinated by Islamic religious leaders with the belief that We, Our and Us is Allah; presents details of the Benghazi attack, and contains thirty-seven questions that should be addressed by the Select Committee on Benghazi. Knowledge is a wonderful gift and much of it is presented in this book.

How should the U.S. deal with Iran’s expansionist objective to develop a nuclear weapon and dominate the world? There is no alternative: either live with an enemy that seeks to destroy the U.S., its ally Israel, and dominate countries around the world or, conquer Iran by war or starve it economically.

The Obama-Iran Nuclear Deal has made it easier for Iran to pursue their development of a nuclear bomb, infuse $150,000 billion dollars into their economy, and support terrorist operations. Why would the U.S. make such a stupid move? Actually, it was not the U.S. Congress representing the American people, it was Obama who has an affinity for Iran and the Muslim people, whereby he facilitated the nuclear deal, which was endorsed by the United Nations Security Council (http://www.voanews. com/content/un-security-council-expected-to-approve-iran-nuclear-deal/ 2870048.html).

The American people, due to a liberal or politically corrupted media, has not been informed that Obama has been indoctrinated in the Qur’an as a young boy and it has, in his adult years, affected his reasoning to think objectively for the safety of the United States. One must never forget the failure of the U.S. media to inform Americans and many countries about the threat announced by Obama at the U.N. General Assembly, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” Obama stated this Islamic threat two weeks after the Benghazi attack. Regardless of the context in which he stated this threat, one would expect a Muslim Leadernot a U.S. President to make such a statement.

A Realistic and Practical Approach by America.

Iran will pursue a nuclear bomb with or without the Obama-Iran Nuclear Deal. There is no other recourse for America but to stand up to Iran with a strong position that they STOP all development of a nuclear weapon or allow, anytime and anywhere, 24/7 inspections by American scientists. Failure to do so will mean no ‘snapback sanctions’ or war but a military strike on all known nuclear sites. To not take this position, the U.S. will gamble the lives of its people, destruction of its land, and world-wide pollution of the earth because Iran will eventually initiate a nuclear bomb first. He who hesitates is lost.

There is a peaceful solution.

There must be a stop to the destructive cancer infecting free countries around the world with an ideology taught by Islamic religious leaders. This ideology is driven by the Qur’an and Sharia law, which indoctrinates Muslims with an intolerance of the religious beliefs of others as demonstrated by their objective to dominate the world and publically chant, “Death to America and Death to Israel.” Islam is a cancerous growth that insidiously affects many countries around the world because Muslims will never integrate with other people and assimilate their cultural values and laws.

The prophetic words of this article should be sufficient to wake people up around the globe. Figure 2 substantiates the indoctrinated mind-set of Muslims to eliminate the democratic freedoms countries have fought for. When Muslims are willing to behead people who disagree with their religion it verifies they are unable to use logic to compare, analyze, and scrutinize other religions. They are unable to assess how their own religion has limited their ability to think and reason constructively. Chapter 5.2, Indoctrination of the Muslim Mind, presented in Obama, Islam and Benghazi provides an excellent understanding how Muslims become gullible and easily ruled by their Muslim leaders.

Figure 2. Muslims inciting hate, terror and violence.

The people of Iran and perceptive Islamic religious leaders must initiate a religious revolution of The Qur’an. However impractical and unrealistic this endeavor is, they need to revise its many verses that infect the Muslim mind with bigotry, hate, violence, and the killing of innocent people who have other religious beliefs. It is The Qur’an that is the source of discontent in many, many countries. If Islamic religious leaders are reluctant to revise The Qur’an with God’s greatest command, “love one another” then a revolution by the Muslim people becomes necessary. Failure to revise The Qur’an with God’s greatest command will initiate an inevitable solution – the U.S realistic and practical approach cited above.

Comments to this article are welcomed. A press release for this article appears on:

In a speech given in Orlando Florida on June 14, 2016, Barack Obama gave his response to the 49 people killed and 53 injured inside a gay nightclub by an Islamic terrorist. In his speech he played down the Islamic international threat by specifically indicating it was a single killer with the availability of a powerful assault weapon instead of identifying the attack by an Islamic terrorist by saying, “Now, those who were killed and injured here were gunned down by a single killer with a powerful assault weapon.”

Again, Obama will not associate the killer was motivated by Islamic indoctrination. Instead, he tries to convince the American people it was committed by a lone gunman that has no ties to terror organizations. He referred to the attack as terror and hate without associating the killer with Islam.

Obama used deceptive words to the American people by emphasizing it was a lone gunman acting out of hate and he couched the Islamic attack as being due to propaganda. It is provided below:

“So whatever the motivations of the killer, whatever influences led him down the path of violence and terror, whatever propaganda he was consuming from ISIL and Al Qaida, this was an act of terrorism, but it was also an act of hate. This was an attack on the LGBT community.”

Obama ended his speech by hoping God will reduce hatred and curb violence by saying, “May He give us resolve to do what’s necessary to reduce the hatred of this world, to curb the violence. May He watch over this country that we call home.”

Obama’s speech was anemic in identifying the cause of the terror attack and then hopes that God, not American resolve, will eliminate the threat of terrorism.

Americans are beginning to question Obama’s approach to secure the country from Islamic terrorism. They realize that he has not worked with our military commanders to propose a plan that will effectively eliminate the terror organizations. Instead, his speech confirms he will not associate terror attacks as being motivated by Islamic beliefs.

Obama has already revealed his propensity to be weak in defeating Islamic terrorism as demonstrated with the Benghazi attack in Libya that took the lives of four Americans. His response to excuse his ineffectiveness was to blame the September 11, 2012 Benghazi terror attack on a YouTube video.

Even if President Obama did not originate the YouTube story, he approved it and publically lied to the American people. Two weeks after the Benghazi attack, Obama continued denouncing the distasteful YouTube video about the prophet Muhammad. On September 25, 2012, at the UN, President Obama announced a threat to representatives and governments around the world by stating,

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

As president of all Americans from many different ethnic and religious persuasions why should he state there is no future for those who slander the prophet of Islam?

One would expect a Muslim Leader, not the President of the United States, to state a threat to those that slander the prophet of Islam. This announcement by Obama reveals he has a strong affinity for Islam and the Muslim people. Obama’s affinity for the Muslim people and the Islamic religion continues today as he will not associate Muslim terrorism with Islamic ideology. Instead, Obama publically states to the American people that, “Islam is a religion of peace.” The American media will not show the photo that illustrates the Islamic objective is to have Islam dominate the world. The photo was provided via http://iranpoliticsclub.net/islam/islam-ww3/index.htm; the largest website that informs people world-wide of the Islamic threat.

The Sad Reality of Today. It is sad to learn that democrats and republicans cannot work together to identify that Islamic ideology is driven by the Qur’an and implemented with Sharia law. Because of party allegiances to President Obama, Islamic ideology is not defined. This inability to define the problem prevents Muslims and Americans to solve the fanatical terrorism problem.

It has become evident that many top representatives in government will discard truth and integrity to protect their interests and jobs to fall in line with Obama’s weak response to the Islamic threat both in America and countries around the world. The morality and truthfulness that is needed to keep America strong and be the greatest country on earth has reached a new low. The lack of integrity stems from the poor education provided to our youth whereby respect and honor for the truth is not taught.

Have Americans come to accept lies by their leaders or are many poorly educated and can easily be made fools of? Will Americans continue to accept:

>>> Obama not identifying the threat as Islamic in such instances as the Fort Hood and the Orlando massacre terror attacks?

>>> The fabricated YouTube lies by Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton? Their lies were fabricated to divert any culpability for the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya. This is well documented in the novel, Obama, Islam and Benghazi.

>>> Obama propaganda to the American people that “Islam is a religion of peace?” This claim is false as clearly documented in the novel Allah, We, Our and Us.

>>> Obama’s release of five top Islamic military terrorists from Guantanamo for a U.S. deserter ?

>>> The Obama-Iran Nuclear Deal? It allows 150 billion dollars to be injected into Iran’s economy and continued development of a nuclear weapon. Is Iran, a Shiite regime, being supported by a Shiite Muslim?.

>>> Obama’s statement two weeks after the Benghazi attack to the United Nations? At this international body, Obama stated that “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” These are the words expected from a Muslim leader NOT the president of the United States.

>>> Obama is an African-American? In reality, Obama is a Muslin-American by birth. His father and brothers are all Shiites. To denounce his Islamic faith, he would be an apostate, which will make him a target for death according to Sharia law.

>>> Obama is an American citizen? This is true, but it does not exclude the fact that he is a Shiite Muslim. As a Shiite, it is plausible to see that Obama supported the Shiite terrorist regime of Iran by facilitating the Obama-Iran Nuclear Deal. The American media would not inform the American public of these facts. Integrity and truth based upon facts are no longer the standard of honest and objective reporting by the Liberal Media of today.

The above list is but a small sample that confirms Obama compromises the safety of the United States with his affinity for the Muslim people and belief in the Islamic faith; a belief inculcated into his mind with his indoctrination of the Qur’an as a young boy. This fact has not been revealed by the liberal media and government representatives who may be too embarrassed to admit Obama, a Shiite Muslim by birth, was not vetted properly to be president of the U.S.

A Press Release was issued on June 24, 2016 and may be viewed via the link:

Will our Government representatives permit the Obama-Clinton Benghazi deception to go unpunished? Will Americans accept Hillary Clinton’s continued run for president even though she deleted classified e-mails placed in an unauthorized server? These violations far exceed the violation of General Petraeus.

America may be losing its most beautiful heritage as the land of opportunity for all people because its moral structure and high regard for truth has deteriorated; and it all begins with the president of America.

WorldNetDaily (WND) on June 12, 2016 posted an article, Orlando shooter a ‘lone wolf’? Not so fast!The following passages with a two-path solution to resolve the Islamic threat was written after reading the astute thoughts by Clare Lopez, vice president for research and analysis at the Center for Security Policy. She spent two decades in the field as a CIA operations officer, was an instructor for military intelligence and special forces students, and has been a consultant, intelligence analyst and researcher within the defense sector.

She objected to the term “lone wolf” term, “because, while individual jihadists may not have a formal connection to a recognized terrorist organization, there is still an essential link: a common ideology.” Lopez went on to state, “Their allegiance is to Islam and to Shariah, to Islamic law, and, of course, under Islamic law homosexuality is a capital crime. It is one of the crimes called illicit sex, addressed both in the Quran and in the hadiths. The death penalty typically is supposed to be stoning, but bullets will do.”

Lopez described something else that all individual jihadists have in common with such groups as al-Qaida and ISIS: a religious obligation. In fact, it is something that binds all Muslims, at least, in theory.

“Under Islamic law and doctrine, there is something called ‘enjoin the good, forbid the evil,’ and this derives, again, from the sunnah, which is an account of the life of Muhammad, and the hadiths,” said the scholar and former spy.

“What it means is that every single Muslim is individually responsible in a personal way for upholding Shariah. In other words, that doctrine makes of every single Muslim a potential, a possible, vigilante. They are obligated to enforce Shariah on an individual basis.”

She contrasted Muslim and Christian attitudes by observing, “Christians are obligated to live by the 10 Commandments, but each individual Christian isn’t obligated for enforcing them. But in Islam, it’s the other way.” Clare emphasized, “Each Muslim is obligated to enforce it. They are supposed to start by speaking and trying to persuade somebody, or show them the evil of their ways, or whatever they can. But if that doesn’t work, then they are obligated to take physical action.”

Clare Lopez should have noted that ‘enjoin equity and forbid evil’ is stated in the Qur’an itself as follows:

Sura 3:105:Let there be from among you a party whose business it should be to invite goodness, to enjoin equity and to forbid evil. It is they who shall prosper.

That party consists of Islamic religious leaders who enforce the commands and abominations of hate, bigotry, violence and murder of people who have beliefs other than Islam. The book, Allah, We, Our and Usconclusively reveals that ‘We, Our and Us’ is not the all-forgiving and compassionate God Allah but a group of fanatical religious men who act using the name of Allah. We see these fanatics surface in the following Qur’anic verse (one of many):

Sura 7:5-7:Little is it that you heed. How many a town have We destroyed! Our punishment came upon their dwellers by night or while they slept at noon. When Our punishment came upon them all they could utter was: We are indeed wrongdoers.

In his comments on the Orlando gay-killing atrocity, Obama called it an act of terror, but importantly, he never once mentioned the words Islam, Islamic or Muslim. Americans have been insulated by the liberal media from the knowledge that Obama was indoctrinated in the Qur’an as a young boy for several years. It is why he has an affinity for Muslims and fervently protects the accusation that Islam is the cause. However, Obama revealed his zeal for Islam two weeks after the September 11, 2012 Benghazi terror attack that took four American lives.

On September 25, 2012, Obama announced a threat to world members in the United Nations General Assembly by stating,

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

This threat was in reference to a YouTube video as having stimulated the attack in Benghazi. It was Obama’s attempt to blame the terror attack on a distasteful video that initiated a spontaneous reaction rather than admit it was a preplanned attack by Islamic terrorists. Obama’s response reflects the years of Islamic indoctrination that does not leave the inculcated mind even though he had the benefits of an education received at such American universities as Harvard and Columbia. As one carefully reads the above threat, one deduces that these are the words of a powerful Muslim leader – not the President of the United States.

It compromises the security of the American people for Obama to be reluctant to define Islam as a real threat. Instead, he is willing to compound the Islamic threat by inviting thousands of Muslims into America without any background checks. Obama traded 5 high ranking terrorist prisoners from Quantanamo for an American traitor with the lame excuse that by keeping terrorists in Quantanamo causes more Islamic converts. Regarding the Orlando massacre, Obama blames the terrorist attack on availability of guns and refuses to identify the terrorist with an inculcated Islamic ideology, which was ingrained by his parents from a Muslim country with strong Islamic and Sharia law beliefs. Indeed, Obama is not fit to be President of the United States and should resign for lies and inaction that caused the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya. The facts that reveal Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton as being culpable for the Benghazi deaths are documented in Obama, Islam and Benghazi, published in 2015.

This book was sent to every member of the Select Committee on Benghazi to surface the answers of 36 questions presented in the last chapter. It is available as a Free Read on

All people around the globe need to be informed about what drives the fanatical behavior of Muslims to kill those who do not follow Islamic law. It is necessary for all people to try to understand the problem in order to solve the problem. There is a well-known axiom, “You must first define the problem before you can solve the problem.” The problem that needs to be defined is – Islam. And yet, the First Muslim-American President of the United States, Obama, cannot even say the words Islamic terrorism or Islamic extremists. Read the post, Obama, the First Muslim-American President provided on this website.

With Islam, there are two paths to solve the Islamic threat:

(1) Muslims must all recognize that the Qur’an must be revised to eliminate the abominable verses that advocate bigotry, hatred, violence and the killing of people who do not follow Islam – they must force their religious leaders to have the Qur’an proclaim the greatest command by a Man of God, Love one another.

(2) Failing to revise the Qur’an, then there will inevitably be a Third World War to eliminate Islam in all countries where their culture and values are being threatened. Islam is an ideology that does not aspire to raise people to emulate truth, integrity and love of all people. Rather, Islam is taught by fanatical religious leaders who indoctrinate and mislead unsuspecting minds with abominable verses contained in the Qur’an and implemented with Sharia law.

To learn about the history of Islam, an objective analyses of the Qur’an, why Muslims are taught that Islam will dominate the world, and recommended actions for Islamic, Judaic, and Christian leaders to achieve unity in the belief in God, read Allah, We, Our and Us. It is available as a Free Read by clicking on:

All people, be they Americans or not, have a responsibility to educate themselves about a threat that could someday day take their lives. Read Allah, We, Our and Us and be informed. To not educate yourselves, you invite death upon yourselves.

Has this article given you a clearer understanding why the Islamic threat must be defined? Why the Orlando massacre is not a ‘lone wolf’ terrorist inspired action but rather an ingrained Islamic ideology inspired by the Qur’an and Sharia law? Do you believe Obama is the first Muslim-American president that is sympathetic towards Muslims, harbors Islam as his faith, and is willing to transform America to accept the values and culture of Muslims and Islam?

The book, God, Us and the Universe by Nicholas Ginex contains a compilation of 51 articles posted on an Internet forum. The author shared his thoughts with many discerning and intelligent people who exhibited extraordinary depth with their comments. The interaction between them and the author opened many avenues of thought whereby together they gained perspectives about God, religion, philosophy, politics and ethics. A portion of this article was extracted to enlighten people that the Scriptures of the Judaic, Christian and Islamic religions need to be revised.

Will Science and Religion Be Compatible?

At a very young age, I was not immersed in the biblical Genesis account of the Creation because both my parents had to work for a living while my brother and I were raised by our Sicilian grandparents, who spoke very little English. It was not my parents but my religious Catholic instruction that acquainted me with the belief in God. At that stage of religious development, I had no real appreciation of the Creation account except that Adam was the first man and that Eve was created from Adam’s rib.

Fortunately, I received a public education and in high school enjoyed learning biology and was introduced eventually to the theory of evolution. I admired Darwin’s work and courage to document his research efforts that had, in my mind, much credibility. For even I, at a tender age, realized that man has many of the same organs and functions of dogs, cats, and our closest relatives, monkeys and apes. Funny, I thought, these animals have the same two eyes, ears, nose to breathe, arms, legs, and sexual and breathing apparatus as humans. Wow, we have so much in common. So even then, I found it difficult to believe man was independently created by God but was a more complex and fortunate creature to have had a greater brain, a voice to develop language, and hands to build and eventually write what he had learned in life.

Regarding God, very few people discount the belief in God. Those that do discount God as taught by a religion believe in God from a personal point of view. Even atheists and agnostics, as well as scientists, have no idea how the first atom was created and how billions of atoms came into existence to form matter. It boggles the mind to learn that there are billions of galaxies with billions of stars and billions of planets that make up our universe. Until scientists are able to answer how matter was created that eventually gave birth to living organisms, mankind will always believe in God. I do. The God I believe in has no form; He is incomprehensible, mysterious, and yet responsible for initiating the universe. So I believe in a force that pervades the universe. That force has found its way to conceive life, and all things are made from the same stuff that started the universe.

After receiving my indoctrination in Catholicism, I ventured into many different types of Christian churches and even attended Greek Orthodox and Jewish houses of worship. I was always impressed listening to the radio, with the talks given by rabbis, in fact, more so than sermons given by priests. So I had an open mind seeking to understand who was God. All my life I was interested in philosophy, sociology, and the humanities because I loved learning about the accomplishments of mankind and some of their greatest thoughts that I might embrace.

Well, into my forties, I read books by many religious scholars and became engrossed in learning more about what Egyptologists had to say about the past history of an almost forgotten civilization. Egyptologists such as Henry H. Breasted and E. A. Wallis Budge brought to life great works of beauty revealed within Egyptian temples, pyramids, and monuments. More importantly, upon reading their deciphered hieroglyphics, I learned how man first conceived one universal God; that God existed for over two thousand years before the birth of Jesus Christ. Having acquired quite a bit of knowledge from men who dedicated their lives to unearth and reveal history of a very spiritual people, I unintentionally started to write, upon my retirement as an engineer, to produce Legacy of a Fatherfor my children.

This was the first book I ever wrote and I say unintentionally because I never planned to write a book. Sitting at my computer, the book unfolded itself into a logical sequence of who were the Egyptian people, their history and beliefs, and how their beliefs were imitated by the Hebrews who developed their religion based upon the beliefs in a soul, a hereafter, a morality based on truth and righteousness, and a belief in one universal God. Upon writing about the beliefs of the Egyptian people, I naturally was obligated to read the Torah, the Gospels and Revelation, and the Koran. This education allowed me to provide an objective critique of the Judaic, Christian, and Islamic scriptures. Of greater worthiness, I was able to reflect on what I wrote and provide recommendations to the religious leaders and followers of these faiths, which would be helpful in bringing their beliefs into a more unified version.

I have said enough about why I believe the idea of God will always prevail as long as science has not learned where the first atom came from. Those who desire to pursue how man first conceived God and how that God has profoundly influenced the development of the Judaic, Christian, and Islamic religions are encouraged to do an Internet search on the title Future of God Amen. As a man of optimism and love for the human race, I do believe that there are many men and women in this world who are intelligent enough to recognize that changes must be made in our religious beliefs about God.

It is easy to rant and rave why people should or should not believe in God and that it has been religious people who have caused the deaths of millions upon millions of innocent people. But there is a solution whereby science and religion can advance in parallel in our quest to know God by revealing the truth of our past. I recommend people read Future of God Amen to understand that the truth of the past can complement our scientific advancements. Perhaps this book will motivate daughters and sons of God to emerge and assist religious leaders to undertake a revision of their holy scriptures so that all people will not only accept each other’s religion, but also learn to love one another.

After much research and writing about God and the development of the major religions, it became clear that Scripture was inspired by men of God. They put in writing the commands that would help their people to live in harmony under a given set of rules of conduct. Such rules of conduct were developed by the first formal religion of the world that existed in Egypt. Long before Abraham and Moses, the Priesthood of Amon developed the belief in one-universal God, the Creator of all there is. It was this belief that cemented rules of conduct that, if followed, would allow the righteous to join their God upon death.

During many hundreds of years, the Egyptian priesthood revised their beliefs many times. They eventually replaced their beliefs in many gods with one-universal God. That God is announced by name today by many people – Amen. The Priesthood of Amon wrote, Amon as the Sole God. It was composed during the reign of Ramses II after accepting many of the ideas first composed by Amenhotep IV (reigned 1375-1358) who wrote, The Hymn to the Aton. Both hymns are provided in the book Future of God Amen.

Through many centuries, the major religions have fought to establish their God as the true God. We see today, extremist Muslims killing Jews, Christians, Buddhists and people of other faiths because their Scripture, The Qur’an, states they have the true religion (Sura 9:29), it is the Religion of Truth, and that Allah will make it prevail over all other religions (Sura 9:33). Hence, on the world stage we have a “bully religion” whereby Islamic leaders indoctrinate their followers to eliminate the religious beliefs of other people and kill them to achieve their objective.

To stop the insanity of killing people in the name of God, the Muslim people themselves must pressure their religious leaders to wake up and revise the Qur’an to reflect the greatest command given by a Man of God – love one another. If the Egyptian priesthood were intelligent enough to update their Scriptures many times until they arrived at the belief in one universal God, so can Judaic, Christian, and Islamic religious leaders. It is foolish to believe that Scripture is encased in concrete never to be changed. Will religious leaders of these faiths be perceptive, compassionate, and wise to revise their Scriptures with the objective to teach all people to love one another?

A cooperative response to this challenge by religious leaders and their followers will steer mankind into the realm of knowledge where science and faith are compatible in man’s quest to know God. Such an effort is based upon truth of the evolution of God and religion that is obtainable from our past history.

The following assessment of the author was given by Dr. Ahreeman, a college professor.

“Nicholas Ginex is a valuable author, scholar and philosopher. His writings are enlightening and informing to the open minds. His views are about universal love and peace for the mankind and all creatures throughout the universe. Reading Ginex books are essential for the philosophy, history and science buffs and enthusiasts.

Ginex is an explorer in time and space, travelling with the warp speed throughout the universe, seeking for the truth of the universe. Can you catch up with Ginex? The only way you can, is if you have an open mind!”