Search This Blog

Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

My First Large Scale Model

This is my build of Georges Guynemer's SPAD S.VII. I made it some years ago, and it was my very first large scale kit; 'large' scale nowadays means 1:32 or bigger. It's a Roden kit, one of the series of large scale kits they produced which kicked off the current enthusiasm for large scale in the admittedly niche field of WWI aircraft modelling. And these kits certainly gave me the push I needed to get back into making models, models of any kind. Roden have felt obliged to give up this series since the renowned Wingnuts Wings kits have appeared, which is a pity since the Roden models still stand up well, and Wingnuts Wings certainly haven't covered all possible subjects. I am going to criticise the model, but please don't think I have a downer on it. I'm still proud of it, and it was quite a success, considering it had been so long since I had done any serious modelling.

I knowingly cheated in certain regards, and one is a biggie. The biggest challenge with a kit of one of the classic SPAD fighters is the rigging. They look like two-bay wings, don't they? Look more closely, and you'll see that the rigging is single-bay, sort of - it meets the first set of struts half way up. Not easy to manage, when Roden's moulding is so thin. Accurate, but you can see how those middle struts are bowing, especially on the port wing. And I thought I would make it easy on myself by giving the plane single rigging. Unfortunately, the SPAD had double rigging on its flying wires (those are the ones running from lower down on the fuselage, rising up to the upper wing towards the tip; the other wires crossing them are known as landing wires, usually single because they don't carry so much tension). I suppose I was nervous about the complication of that, but it's a distinctive part of the look of the plane, and I've since managed it okay on other models, notably my S.E.5s. It's a double pity that I didn't do it, because I'm soon going to build another SPAD VII, this a Russian one on skis, and it won't look right with the different rigging. Not that many people will notice - I usually have to point out the faults to them first.

Possibly more noticeable to some people is the propeller. I didn't think much about this at the time, and painted it a plain 'wood brown'. But soon afterwards I saw that modellers were managing to depict a much more realistic wood effect on propellers and elsewhere, and I learnt how to do it. The technique involves successive layers of a pale base, then some careful streaking with artist's oil paints, then something like transparent orange. I actually had my niece admire that once, without any prompting! She's usually very hard to impress :)

Another annoying detail is the lack of the faired fuel lines down from the upper wing. The parts came already broken, they were very fiddly and I gave up on them. I felt they wouldn't matter, but it still bugs me because I always spot them when I look at pictures of the real thing. It's not only my imagination, they do stand out more than I assumed.

And we can make a direct comparison. Only a small handful of famous planes from the Great War survive, but this is one of them. Georges Guynemer was already famous and beloved when he moved on to other planes (the SPAD XII and the SPAD XIII), and his SPAD VII was preserved straight away. Here it is, at the Musée de l'Air in Paris. And I bet you've seen the major visual difference before I even mention it. The real thing is filthy, isn't it? I believe in reality it has received some restoration, but they've certainly held back from cleaning it up. It looks like what it is, a warplane which had been through a lot of combat. I haven't got into weathering and all that yet. You don't absolutely need an airbrush for that, but the experts on weathering do use them. So all the planes I've built so far look factory-fresh. Another aspect of the plane's appearance is its colour. There are two main colours, one of the bare varnished fabric, the other a similar colour of paint shade applied to plywood and metal surfaces. Photography is partly to blame for the different looks of model and real plane, but I would still say the tint of the theoretically correct colour I used for that second paint is somewhat off.

Here's a picture of the final model, as currently displayed. I added a nice figure of Guynemer to it, to go along with that goose (it may seem a bit overscale, but I've just come back from a trip to France and saw some geese at one point; really big b---ers they were). One irritating detail is that his principal decoration, Legion d'Honneur I assume, went flying off towards the floor here and there was no hope of finding it. The sculptor had provided it as a separate part, you see!
When I present my Russian SPAD, I want to retire this one. I'll extract Georges, though not the goose, and wait for a decent model of his XII or his XIII to come out.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

A Fairey Swordfish, and not as you usually see these famous old planes.
I bought this kit a very long time ago; on my very long to-do list is a vague project of making a group of the planes a certain uncle flew. I never met him, he was killed in WWII. Basil was a pilot and an observer in the Fleet Air Arm from around 1929 onwards, serving principally in HMS Glorious, whose aircraft sported distinctive yellow stripes in peacetime. Although the Swordfish is very well known, the others aren't, and ideally I'd still like to pick up kits of two other aircraft. One, the Fairey IIIF, doesn't seem to have ever been kitted by anybody. A shame, because it was a very elegant looking machine. But it never went to war, and that's what attracts kitmakers.

So. My uncle left behind a number of photos, some taken by himself, and the Swordfish featured in them all have the classic silver dope, and the Glorious' yellow markings. A very different appearance to this one. I've buil…

This is a Blackburn Shark, a torpedo-spotter-reconnaissance plane which served onboard an aircraft carrier for only a few years in the mid-1930s until replaced by the Fairey Swordfish (see previous post). The blue markings signify that this particular plane served aboard HMS Courageous. The odd thing, to me at least, is that except briefly aboard HMS Furious, it mainly did only serve aboard that one carrier; I'd be curious to know why. The broad picture is of an extraordinary variety of different types serving in the Fleet Air Arm in the Twenties and Thirties, often for only a few years at a time, and when the Royal Navy had a mere 5-6 carriers for them to fly from. And yet, there were a few hundred of these planes built. I imagine most ended up operating from land bases, for training purposes.

This is another of my quick builds, and I wouldn't have troubled this blog with it, except for some model making points, and that, like with the Swordfish, there's a connection to …

I've just had a spell of vehicle building. These are all in 1:72 scale, and destined for various dioramas or layouts. From left to right, they are: a WWI Mack AC fuel truck; a WWI FWD 3-ton truck, those two both US; a British Daimler armoured car, late WW2 & post war; and an American post war Dodge truck, 1950s but used as recently as the First Iraq War. And there's loads of international feel with this group: the kitmakers are RPM (Poland), Roden (Ukraine), Hasegawa (Japan) and Academy (South Korea).

What have I learnt... For one thing, the early vehicles of the Great War seem to have had really complicated machinery underneath. See the chain drive of the Mack truck? And the FWD truck is interesting. This was the Four Wheel Drive company which did indeed produce the first such vehicles, initially for agricultural use. I've built it as an American vehicle, but it was procured in very large numbers by the British. The fuel truck is curious, to my eyes, for having that …