Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.

* Seventh graders can now be vaccinated without parents’ knowledge or permission.

Vaccine marketers scored a landmark victory in California in
October 2011 when Jerry Brown fetched the stick and signed into law a
new bill allowing schools to vaccinate 12 year olds without informing
their parents.

That’s right. Kids now choose.

Falling into step with other compliant governors like Rick
Perry and WA state’s Christine Gregoire, Brown demonstrated once more
his allegiance to the bottomless coffers of the drug industry lobby.
Common sense, putting children in harm’s way, running roughshod over
parent’s rights, responsible science – not relevant. Seems the world
just got a little worse.

There can be no doubt that the underlying motive behind the
new law was the promotion of the controversial Human Papilloma Virus
vaccine [see HPV chapter] [1].

But the new law never mentions HPV.

Although this vaccine has been on the adolescent Vaccine
Schedule for 5 years now, many parents are losing confidence in it
lately and have been opting out of the vaccine for their 12 year olds.
The primary reasons are

Lack of demonstrable necessity

Lack of scientific testing

Verifiable and admitted harmful side effects

The
reader is referred to the above chapter [1] for the details of the
confused rationale that has always haunted the marketing of this strange
vaccine, as doctors struggled to justify the vaccine’s necessity at
all.

But with this new law, now they have done something
unprecedented in vaccine promo by allowing the state to come between
parents and their own children.

The whole science discussion is a study in confusion and
misdirection, which is just the way Merck wants it – Merck being the
inventor of the Gardasil HPV vaccine, and the ultimate beneficiary of
the new law. To try and grasp what they have just accomplished by this
bill, the parent must first review some basic facts about

1. cancer of the cervix

2. its relation to Human Papilloma virus

3. the HPV vaccine

.

CANCER OF THE CERVIX

Cancer of the cervix now affects some 13,000 American women,
4,000 of whom die. [1] Most deaths are in the worst living
environments in the US, among the most immune-suppressed groups. But
like with all cancers, the cause of this one remains unknown.

Cervical cancer has been declining dramatically in the
United States, from nearly 15 cases for every 100,000 women in 1975 to
nearly 7 per 100,000 in 2008. [12] Nothing to do with vaccines.

In the 1970s, herpes simplex virus was proposed as a possible
cause, but that hypothesis was soon abandoned after studies proved
inconclusive.

In the 1990s the next candidate suggested was Human Papilloma virus. [2] But the link was never proven.

For this the first cancer vaccine, the PR department at Merck
was hard put to come up with a convincing scientific rationale – how
any HPV vaccine could possibly prevent cancer of the cervix.

The primary obstacle was that HPV could not be proven as the
cause of any cancer. Or any disease at all, for that matter. But is
it precisely this claimed causation between HPV and cervical cancer
that necessitates the vaccine at all, right? Without hard evidence,
the vaccine is exposed as a useless sham.

NO PROVEN CONNECTION: HPV AND CANCER

Here’s the short version of how the HPV supposedly causes cancer of the cervix, according to Merck scientists.

First of all, in any cancer, we’re talking about a normal cell that mutated and then began to make copies of itself, unchecked.

The creators of the HPV/ cancer myth are pretending that the
HPV came along and attacked some normal cells and mutated those cells
and caused them to begin replicating themselves out of control –
cancer. And that this is happening on a mass scale even though we just
discovered it. And worse, that a vaccine can neutralize that type of
attack on normal cervix cells.

Any scientist not on the payroll of Merck will see the
problem with this new ‘hit-and-run’ theory right off the bat. The
simple fact is that viruses don’t replicate in cancer cells. [Duesberg,
3]. Before this marketing campaign for HPV vaccine, no virus was ever
claimed as carcinogenic.

But it gets even worse than that. The HPV vaccine doesn’t
even contain HPV! True. Just some particles from the virus. Look it
up. [1, 2]

Apparently this fact is not considered worth knowing by the
majority of parents, who obediently line up their children for whatever
shots the Vaccinators will command. “They must be good for kids or
they wouldn’t be giving them,” is the standard substitute for thinking,
adopted by the uninformed parent. Don’t bother me with the facts.

More and more parents possessing a bit more refined powers of
intellect however have been looking behind the veil in the last two
years, and realizing the indefensibility of the preposterous ‘viral
particle theory’ which is supposed to explain the Gardasil HPV vaccine’s
mode of action in preventing cancer. (see chapter for details [1])
This steadily growing subset of informed parents began opting out –
signing the forms which exempt their child from the vaccine.

The vaccine industry freaked. But first they had to deal with a more obvious PR problem.

WHAT ABOUT THE BOYS?

Why has a vaccine claiming to be for cancer of the cervix –
why has this vaccine been routinely given also to boys ever since it
came out?

Excellent question. It is answered completely in our June 2011 Newsletter

Short answer: A spurious shotgun ‘study’ was hurriedly done for New England Journal of Medicine
which provided the required rationale. Serendipitously, we just found
out that boys need the same vaccine as girls, but for genital warts.
[4,5]

What a coincidence.

So with the spotlight suddenly on HPV after 5 years, with the
vast majority of kids routinely getting the shots, people were finally
starting to take a look at the vaccine. The warts thing, even though
ridiculous, satisfied the undiscriminating silent majority.

But that wasn’t enough to cover up all the bad press. After
the Sept 2011 Michelle Bachman ambush of Rick Perry on CNN, [6] where
his well known financial connections with Merck were yet again aired on
national TV, HPV vaccine looked really suspect. More people began
opting out.

Vaccine industry double freaking now.

SEX, BLOOD, AND RACISM

In today’s version of E.L. Bernays journalism [7], new life
can be injected into virtually any story by framing it in one of the
Holy Trinity issues. If the underlying facts are unclear, boring, or
just inconveniently true, no problem – we can forget about those
details. We’ll just hide the underlying story and make it about sex or
blood or racism. Now it pops. Better yet, we buried the lead.
Framing the issue is everything; substance is but a passing myth.

For HPV, they chose Sex. Obscure the main facts of the issue, which are:

- HPV virus has never been proven as the cause of any disease

– HPV virus has never been proven as the cause of cancer of the cervix

– HPV vaccine has never been proven to have the slightest effect on any

cancer at all

– By no stretch of the imagination can cancer of the cervix be regarded as an STD

Let’s
ignore these worrisome facts and bury them behind an emotional
smokescreen under Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Wow. Now we have a
story about teenage girls and STDs – fantastic. Now that’s newsworthy!

And that’s precisely what they’ve done. Read any story about
HPV in mainstream media, and even in some of the websites and health
sites that are appalled by the political issue of having parent’s
rights obliterated ¬ – even they accept as real the erroneous fiction
that cancer of the cervix is an STD. It isn’t! STD’s are infectious!
Remember? Sexually transmitted

infections. No cancer is infectious.

So much for background on the vaccine. Now, about that new bill.

CALIFORNIA BILL AB 499

“This bill would allow a minor who is 12 years of age or
older to consent to medical care related to the prevention of a
sexually transmitted disease.

“The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.- Section 6926 of the Family Code is amended to read:

(a) A minor who is 12 years of age or older and who may have come into

contact with an-infectious, contagious, or communicable disease may

consent to medical care related-to the diagnosis or treatment of the

disease, if the disease or condition is one that is-required by law or

regulation adopted pursuant to law-to be reported to the local health

officer, or is a related sexually transmitted disease, as may be determined

by the State-Director of Health Services Public Health Officer.

- – (b) A minor who is 12 years of age or older may consent to medical care

related to the prevention of a sexually transmitted disease.

- – (c) The minor’s parents or guardian are not liable for payment for

medical care provided-pursuant to this section.”

Whew!
So much dissimulation, so much deliberate misrepresentation, so much
not saying what they really mean. Where does one begin?

OK, let’s roll up our sleeves and just do it.

All the uproar we see against this new bill correctly relates
it to the HPV vaccine, which is given to 12 year old girls. The bad
press the vaccine was getting, loss of confidence, the lawmakers’
financial entanglements with Merck, etc. – this bill was the response
to all that. Without HPV vaccine, this bill would have never been
drafted.

But lawmakers funded by huge drug cartels can employ the most
elegant techniques of Bernays PR ever conceived. They can spin
anything. In this case, the new law never mentions HPV vaccine itself,
distancing itself from that entire discussion – as though this is not a
law to sell HPV vaccine for Merck but rather a way to better protect
our defenseless teenage girls against the ravages of STDs. Who would
argue with something like that?

SIDE EFFECTS OF HPV VACCINE

The reader by now, it is hoped, will start to doubt HPV vaccine’s efficacy – why it cannot do what it claims to do.

Wouldn’t be so bad if it were ineffective and harmless. But this vaccine is also very dangerous, as the manufacturer states.

Additional
side effects discovered later include loss of consciousness, loss of
vision and seizures. (Lopes, [8]) And oh yes, paralysis.

By 2008, the British media began to report still other
effects of Gardasil among young girls, like the 30 deaths, which
American media never mentioned. [10]

An additional symptom from the HPV shot is Guillain Barre
syndrome, an autoimmune condition resulting in paralysis. There have
been several such cases both in the UK and the US, including a high
profile case in Oct 2008 of a 12 year old British girl who collapsed 2
days after the Gardasil shot and was subsequently paralyzed from the
waist down. [10] Her first symptoms came on within 30 minutes. Again, no
US media.

American media missed the followup story a year later when
England suspended HPV vaccine altogether after another 14 girls died
from the vaccine.[9]

26 AMERICAN GIRLS DEAD FROM GARDASIL: OCT 2011

Newer data just released from the VAERS database – the
government tracking system for vaccine injuries since 1991 – this data
makes public the 26 American girls who died from the Gardasil shot in
2010. Believe me this has never been in any mainstream media source.
But you can easily find these documents [11], although scrolling
through them to find the 26 deaths will require that you do a search for
the word ‘death’.

Or you can take the word of Judicial Watch, the group that recently unearthed the data through Freedom of Information.

Again, mainstream media is not allowed to run stories like
this, even though the data is right there in the VAERS files where
anyone can see it.

Is this story newsworthy?

WRAP UP

Show any parent the Vaccine Schedule and ask what any given
vaccine is. What is DPT? What is H. influenzae? What is HPV? What is
Rotateq? Why are you taking your kid in for these shots? They have
no idea, most of them. And they are reassured that they don’t have to
know – it’s not their job. Trust your doctor.

From now on when you read anything about HPV vaccine,
Gardasil, or the new CA bill that allows 12 years olds to be vaccinated
without parental knowledge, keep this little checklist of facts in
front of you:

– HPV virus has never been proven as the cause of any disease,

– HPV virus has never been proven as the cause of cancer of the cervix.

– HPV vaccine has never been proven to have the slightest effect on any cancer at all.

– By no stretch of the imagination can cancer of the cervix be regarded as an STD.

This chapter then is for 2 groups:

1. Parents of 12 year olds who think they should have more say
about what their kids are injected with than the politics of state
government

2. Parents who are sending their kids to get the HPV vaccine.

With media solidly in the pocket of their biggest
advertiser – the drug industry – the parent who gets all the
information about HPV vaccine from Fox News, Yahoo News, Newsweek
magazine, or the local newspaper is going to be told some untrue
mantras, over and over. It only takes a little bit of reading to
demythologize these issues and learn the truth.

So for the small percentage of parents interested enough in
their child’s future to actually do that, their progeny will be immune
enhanced. Natural selection will favor them. And the human race will
have some small advantage for the next generations over the majority of
children who are being immune suppressed by ingredients in the 68
vaccines now mandated. [13]

WHAT YOU CAN DO

As you might suspect, this chapter is only the tip of the
iceberg. HPV vaccine is much more dangerous than presented here, the
underlying science is much weaker, and the economic entanglements
between drugmakers and political entities are much more complicated.
So the first thing a parent can do is to find out a little more.

Rather than doing a blind google search on HPV which is going
to turn up 100,000 hits in .5 seconds, most marketing the safety of
the vaccine, instead follow up on some of the references below. See
if they make sense. Vet this chapter. Get enough information on your
own to make an informed decision whether or not your teenager’s blood
should be the battleground for this political wordgame. Satisfy
yourself that the vaccine meets 3 criteria:

safe

effective

necessary

If you then decide that this vaccine is a bit
too experimental for your child, and you wish to opt out, first of all
sign the standard Exemption Form and turn it in to the school.

Next, click to the Parents Letter To the School. [14] Follow
the directions and send the certified letters letting the school know
who’s really in charge of your kids, them or you.

I think most of us would agree that many horrifying things
are taking place every day in the world today. But we do have the
power to keep at least some of them out of our homes. So obviously the
first step is education from sources not vested in the wholesale
marketing of vaccines.

Today I am going to give you real stories from real people about
their experiences with the dangerous wonder drug Gardasil. The reason
that I am doing this is because I can give you all the data that I can
find but reading actual accounts will help in making the decision to
vaccinate or not. Here are some of them because they are too numerous
to use them all.

Comment by Kate-
2007-09-19 12:49:02
My mother made me get this shot.
The first one was awful. I have never felt such pain from any
vaccination before. No one likes getting stuff poked into them, but the
year before I entered college I received 5 shots at my checkup and none
of them were as bad as Gardasil. I had intense pain in the injection
site for about 2 weeks after receiving it.
My second shot was so bad my body temperature rose, I had the most
massive headache I have ever felt, blacked out and then fainted. After that shot I had severe pain in my arm for 2 months.
I am refusing to get the 3rd shot.
I've been doing a lot of research on this lately and it does not seem
worth it to me when they do no even know how long this will last. There
are no long-term case studies to find out how effective it will be. If
you are not having unprotected sex right now then what is the problem?Today I recieved my 2nd Gardasil shot. I am 18 years old. After the
injection, I sat around for 10 minutes to make sure no breakout occured
on my arm. Once the nurse told me I could leave, I walked to make my
next appointment for the shot, and as the receptionist was talking to me
my vision became darker and darker and I could not hear anything. I ended up fainting and bumping my head on the floor pretty hard,
as well as getting a nice big scratch on my arm. I woke up and there
were nurses all around me giving me juice and crackers. Has anybody else
heard of situations like this with the vaccine? I was only passed out
for a few seconds, but still very very scary.

Comment by Tiffany
I just got my Gardasil shot today, and I NEVER have problems with shots.
I have never passed out because of shots or seeing blood, or anything
like that. This time, however, I got the Gardasil shot and hit the floor HARD.
I felt fine after the shot for about a minute, and even told the nurse
"that wasn't so bad!" Then I got paint in my arm, and my muscles
tightened. Before I knew it, I was waking up to doctor's calling my
name. Not sure what happened!

Comment by Katie
I've always been good with shots — I actually don't mind watching them
go into my arm or seeing my blood drawn or anything. In fact, when I got
my shots for Kindgarden I didn't cry, and the nurse said I was the
first kid that age she'd ever had that didn't cry. My first shot of
Gardasil was the only shot I've ever received that actually made me cry.
It was injected in a closet supply room (where they keep the vaccines.
Weird, I know). As I was talking to my doctor later I felt as if I was
going to faint. I didn't actually faint, but I wobbled around for
about five minutes. It was really scary, and I think it disproves the
"people only faint because they're apprehensive about shots" theory.
Sure, I'd rather be getting a painful shot than cervical cancer or
genital warts, but the Gardasil shot is not fun.

Comment by Lisa

My daughter had the three shots, the third being over 3 months ago. She still has a lump and increasing pain in her arm.
We are now considering surgery, after having mri and other tests. Has
anyone else had this problem, and had it resolve!! If I could do it all
over again, I WOULD NOT have her have these shots.
Comment by Nancy
My daughter is 23 got the 2nd shot on 8/8/07 and has had a terrible reaction to the shot. One week after the shot all of her lymph nodes were swollen. She could not open her mouth, her right arm was retracted.
We went to the hospital 3 days in a row before any one would agree that
she experienced an adverse reaction to the shot. She has tingling in
her right fingers off and on. She has to take Valium and Percocetts so
she can open her mouth and function. Her voice is very high pitched
when she first wakes up. This has been happening for 2 weeks. We are
going to an ENT, rhumatologist and a nueruologist in the next month.
It's been 2.5 months and she is no better.

(Note: These accounts have not been edited for any spelling or
grammatical errors. They have been taken as is from the website.)

I have used this site in a previous article. It seems that the
reactions to this vaccine just keep pouring in. It seems that the most
common long-term side effect is the injection site pain. One of the
postings mentioned the possibility of surgery to remove the painful
lump. Some of the posts mention how this pain has hampered their
ability to do normal tasks like pulling up their pants or raising their
arm.

One of the concerns mentioned was about fertility. I did my due
diligence and wanted to see if there was anything reported. Once again,
unfortunately, this is what I found.

The website is Vaccination Information Service, located in Australia.
Here is an excerpt from an article called "Cervical Cancer Vaccine" "A
vaccine that is claimed to prevent cancer is causing damage that is a
precursor to cancer?" written by Bronwyn Hancock 20 August 2007

Naturopath and Iridologist Michael Blake, of Natures Cure Pty Ltd in Dandenong, Melbourne (web site http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/6025)
is very concerned at what he has seen in the irises of four girls
recently and his conscience will not allow him to stay silent.

In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three
of the girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug
residue. In each of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient
what he was observing, he was informed that the girl had recently
received the cervical cancer vaccine. All were virgins.

Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such
things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It
can also cause infertility — as it can prevent the embryo from being
able to hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of
sensitivity with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent
discharges.
Note that it has already been observed that one of the ingredients in the vaccine, polysorbate 80, has been observed to cause infertility in mice. Add to that borax, which is used to kill ants, add neurotoxic immune system sensitizer aluminium hydroxyphosphate,
and directly inject all of that and any viral material (which is not
proven to be in a harmless form) past the very important natural lines
of defense in the immune system, then what do you think we are asking
for, trouble or protection? I can't tell you what to do — you must
figure it out for yourself.

When I read the above excerpt that states borax, I had an OH MY GOD
experience. What if borax is an ingredient in this vaccine??? I had to
find out immediately.

In her first article dated February 6, 2007, she listed the ingredients of this vaccine.

***sorry I cant read all the posts .. this is not stuff I made up nor is it stuff I've written the main goal of my post was to show people how dangerous the HPV shots are..
my kids 14, 5, 9, 5, & 3 get most there shots.. but thise shots
have been studied, reasearched & aactually can do some good.. unlike
the HPV shot thats supposed to prevent cancer. First of all shots are
for virsus cancer is not a virus, there is no reasearch linking HPV to
cancer, too many people have suffered or died from this shot to make me
feel comfortable allowing my kids to get it. again didnt write the artilces thats why I post websites********

where did i say that? as far as i know, i put up a link to a valid CDC website our own gov trusts..i'm sorry if the truth on the links offends you.

Quoting nikabear:

You have your opinion and I have mine......your post stated that we are killing our children or hurting them by giving this vaccine correct which means I have every right to comment....my daugther and cousin had the vaccine and are fine....no problems so your information is really not valid in my situation....i did my research and the pros outweighed the cons........

Quoting emmy526:

then you really have nothing to compare them to, since they are not of childbearing age...don't just assume everything is or will be peachy keen for them in their conceptual future.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther will be 16 in december and my cousin will be 15 in february so having babies is not on their minds! The only thing that they should be concieving are plans for college!!!.....the only side effect they experienced was a sore injection site

Quoting emmy526:

how old are they? Have they been able to conceive? That is one of the biggest complaints i have heard about this vax as well...trouble concieving in the years following the shot.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther recieved the series of shots and was fine. The only reaction that she had was her arm was sore. My cousin also got the series and is fine as well. No problems.....

Oh yeah certainly 3 people being ok negates studies of thousands who received the vaccine. Wow

Quoting nikabear:

Thank you!!! More proof that this post is not valid......my daugther and cousin are fine, you had three beautiful children and so did your friend after the vaccine! Sounds great to me!!!

Quoting lacyleanne:

I got all three and still conceived a beautiful baby boy. My ovaries are still working. My friend got all three of hers too and conceived. If I have a daughter she will get them too. I've done my research most likely more than you so I'm good to go.

Quoting emmy526:

then you really have nothing to compare them to, since they are not of childbearing age...don't just assume everything is or will be peachy keen for them in their conceptual future.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther will be 16 in december and my cousin will be 15 in february so having babies is not on their minds! The only thing that they should be concieving are plans for college!!!.....the only side effect they experienced was a sore injection site

Quoting emmy526:

how old are they? Have they been able to conceive? That is one of the biggest complaints i have heard about this vax as well...trouble concieving in the years following the shot.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther recieved the series of shots and was fine. The only reaction that she had was her arm was sore. My cousin also got the series and is fine as well. No problems.....

Oh yeah certainly 3 people being ok negates studies of thousands who received the vaccine. Wow

Quoting nikabear:

Thank you!!! More proof that this post is not valid......my daugther and cousin are fine, you had three beautiful children and so did your friend after the vaccine! Sounds great to me!!!

Quoting lacyleanne:

I got all three and still conceived a beautiful baby boy. My ovaries are still working. My friend got all three of hers too and conceived. If I have a daughter she will get them too. I've done my research most likely more than you so I'm good to go.

Quoting emmy526:

then you really have nothing to compare them to, since they are not of childbearing age...don't just assume everything is or will be peachy keen for them in their conceptual future.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther will be 16 in december and my cousin will be 15 in february so having babies is not on their minds! The only thing that they should be concieving are plans for college!!!.....the only side effect they experienced was a sore injection site

Quoting emmy526:

how old are they? Have they been able to conceive? That is one of the biggest complaints i have heard about this vax as well...trouble concieving in the years following the shot.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther recieved the series of shots and was fine. The only reaction that she had was her arm was sore. My cousin also got the series and is fine as well. No problems.....

I didn't receive the vaccine but I have been in treatment for cervical cancer for the past year (I was diagnosed June 8, 2011). There do appear to be SOME people having nasty side effects to the shot but I can tell you first hand that cancer is no walk in the park either.

Read your title post........most parents are know do their research.....the pros outweigh the cons with this vaccination and I did what was best for my daugther. When my youngest gets that age she will get the vacine as well

Quoting emmy526:

where did i say that? as far as i know, i put up a link to a valid CDC website our own gov trusts..i'm sorry if the truth on the links offends you.

Quoting nikabear:

You have your opinion and I have mine......your post stated that we are killing our children or hurting them by giving this vaccine correct which means I have every right to comment....my daugther and cousin had the vaccine and are fine....no problems so your information is really not valid in my situation....i did my research and the pros outweighed the cons........

Quoting emmy526:

then you really have nothing to compare them to, since they are not of childbearing age...don't just assume everything is or will be peachy keen for them in their conceptual future.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther will be 16 in december and my cousin will be 15 in february so having babies is not on their minds! The only thing that they should be concieving are plans for college!!!.....the only side effect they experienced was a sore injection site

Quoting emmy526:

how old are they? Have they been able to conceive? That is one of the biggest complaints i have heard about this vax as well...trouble concieving in the years following the shot.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther recieved the series of shots and was fine. The only reaction that she had was her arm was sore. My cousin also got the series and is fine as well. No problems.....

Sorry but anyone can have a reaction to anything
Just like getting stung by a bee. Some people will have a reaction and some wont, you dont know until you get stung.

Just like putting nair on your legs. Some can get a reation and some wont
Or eating peanuts, some will have a reaction and some wont
Until its in your body you wont know how it will react and if it will not have a negative reaction to some, why shouldnt they take the shot if it will help them. The others are what you call shit out of luck

Read your title post........most parents are know do their research.....the pros outweigh the cons with this vaccination and I did what was best for my daugther. When my youngest gets that age she will get the vacine as well

Quoting emmy526:

where did i say that? as far as i know, i put up a link to a valid CDC website our own gov trusts..i'm sorry if the truth on the links offends you.

Quoting nikabear:

You have your opinion and I have mine......your post stated that we are killing our children or hurting them by giving this vaccine correct which means I have every right to comment....my daugther and cousin had the vaccine and are fine....no problems so your information is really not valid in my situation....i did my research and the pros outweighed the cons........

Quoting emmy526:

then you really have nothing to compare them to, since they are not of childbearing age...don't just assume everything is or will be peachy keen for them in their conceptual future.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther will be 16 in december and my cousin will be 15 in february so having babies is not on their minds! The only thing that they should be concieving are plans for college!!!.....the only side effect they experienced was a sore injection site

Quoting emmy526:

how old are they? Have they been able to conceive? That is one of the biggest complaints i have heard about this vax as well...trouble concieving in the years following the shot.

Quoting nikabear:

My daugther recieved the series of shots and was fine. The only reaction that she had was her arm was sore. My cousin also got the series and is fine as well. No problems.....

sorry I cant read all the posts .. this is not stuff I made up nor is it stuff I've written the main goal of my post was to show people how dangerous the HPV shots are.. my kids 14, 5, 9, 5, & 3 get most there shots.. but thise shots have been studied, reasearched & aactually can do some good.. unlike the HPV shot thats supposed to prevent cancer. First of all shots are for virsus cancer is not a virus, there is no reasearch linking HPV to cancer, too many people have suffered or died from this shot to make me feel comfortable allowing my kids to get it. again didnt write the artilces thats why I post websites

Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.