It's always difficult to come to an agreement regarding when something is still aiding a big picture, and which issues are dealbreakers, assuming that we're not going for utter perfectionism.

Therefore, I'll avoid speculation on where Trump's heart resides and when someone's stances align sufficiently with WN, as that's a bit murky, and instead ask the OP and other people not voting for Trump:

While Trump has ties to powerful Jews, how many of his stated policies and goals (policies that no other Dem./Rep. candidates have put forth) align with the anti-White policies of these Jews, and how many powerful Jews--who've supported every Dem./Rep. candidate, in part--in media, business, and politics, have given him the stamp of approval?

Yep, more childish insults. I will ignore you, because everything you said is full of bovine excrement. You say I'm doing nothing, but you're voting for the Jew lover. At least I'm standing by my principles and not coming up with disgusting justifications for voting for the Jew's puppet

The fact is that the 'Jew lover' is by far the best option given the scale of your demographic problems. The only viable objection to him would be that people need acceleration on the decline to wake up, but for one thing, you do not have that luxury, true ideological change needs economic collapse or at least it usually has needed it throughout history and for another thing, look at Germany, full blown invasion has made nex to no difference. Like others have said, it is only self-gratification to abstain, in reality it is simply inactivity and archives nothing.

The question for me is why would he say these things? He knows he will lose money and business deals because of these positions. He knows people will hate him for it. He knew they weren't popular positions to take. So why enter the race with such issues? He really had nothing to gain from taking these positions, he had everything to lose.

I believe he is genuine. Just my two cents.

Ego? Perhaps Trump tower, tv show, etc, isn't enough. Some say that if he had not run any of his businesses and simply had put his father's money in the bank, he'd be richer than he is now.

Personally I'm not the greatest fan of the guy but I'd vote for him, just in case. He does make some of the right noises and there doesn't seem to be a better option.

__________________

We thought that one can only liberate a people from limitless slavery if one can overcome the slavery inside oneself and prepare the path to the internal freedom that is the precondition for the external.

I am skeptical of Trump, but others pointed out that its his rhetoric that is benefit to us! If a man saying what he says gets elected that will send a strong message to rest of politicians. And this message goes something like "Whites are pissed, Back off!!" Even if he acomplishes half of what he promised, that would be huge!! His victory will pave the way for other politicians to use similar rhetoric. We just might see some real WNs win in politics. The way I see it if Trump wins nomination, that will give me 2 people I will feel comfortable voting for! Trump or Whitaker.

If you refuse to vote as a WN, one you have no right to complain and two you are essentially casting a vote for Hillary.

If you don't vote for Trump, essentially you're giving a vote to Hillary.

Absolute bullcrap. That's such a nonsensical fallacy that both sides spew every election cycle to shame people into voting for their worthless candidates. I could just as easily say not voting for Hillary is giving a vote to Trump. It goes both ways.

And you're wrong; I do have a right to complain. Not voting for Trump doesn't mean I won't vote at all. I'm just not voting for any of these pro-Jew race traitors whose boots some of you are so quick to lick.

And even if I didn't vote at all, I'd still have a right to complain. Why? Because I'm a free white man. You don't get to tell me I can't complain just because I don't do what you want me to do. Just because I refuse to vote for Turd 1 or Turd 2 doesn't mean I can't complain when a Turd gets in office and ruins this country further.

It's divide and conquer because I refuse to vote for your Jew-loving candidate? And you call me a "supposed WN"? That's laughable. You're too stupid to insult. But, as usual, when one WN can't handle that another WN disagrees with them, they try to accuse them of not being a WN. *eyeroll*

You start a thread on a public global forum with some really astute people here and you preface it by saying you don't want a discussion or argument.

And if you could read you'd see I said I have no problem with a discussion. I just won't get into an insult fest with morons like you. No point in going into a battle of wits with someone unarmed, like yourself.

So far, Trump mostly has only his "words" also. Much of what he's advocated and 'promised' is very far from being a reality. Though I do agree that he's presented some entertaining (pissing off anti-Whites) and supportable positions so far.

That's exactly my position. Everything he has said is [empty] promises. He won't be able to deliver on them, and probably doesn't even want to. He's just pandering to get elected to feed his ego. I agree with what he has said about illegal Mexicans, about Muslims, and about the BLM crowd (especially the violent troublemaker who got "roughed up" at a Trump rally). But I'm not gonna support him just because he speaks the truth about Mexicans, but is still in bed with the Jews. The Mexicans don't make decisions in this country. The Jews do. He won't be deporting the Mexicans, he won't be closing down Mosques, unless his Jew handlers say he can.

And the reason I wouldn't support him until after the election is because I want to see if he follows through on his promises. If he gets elected and doesn't follow through, he will not get my support. If he does, then he will. I'll say, "I was wrong; he's a man of his word." But if he doesn't, then all these WNs will jump on the "Trump's a traitor" bandwagon, and I'll be here like, "I told you so." Not sure why it's wrong for me to be a post-election supporter, but not for them to become post-election critics.