The max refresh rate of the human eye is about 50-60 for the average joe schmoe, there are about 4/100 on average that see at about 85-100 and 90-100 for avid gamers. Although at anything higher than 30 it really doesnt make too much of a difference as long as it is smooth at the fps and not jumpy.

Cheap marketing material isn't exactly the best way to prove your point....

Fixed that for ya. and yes it's true bad marketing stills don't really prove a point, the tv will never actually draw a literal new series of frames. Unless it's working with source material that it just found in some dumpster.

I don't get why people get so amped for everything to be as the marketing material states. When I saw Public Enemies I wasn't that hyped about the digital scenes at all, it felt sloppy and it lost a sense of class to it all. :/ going from traditional modes to what felt like someone with a DV.

...Cheap marketing material isn't going to help you. Got an actual source video? I mean really, even if those are accurate I'm not sure I want to see garbage rendered frames being generated by a program that aren't part of the original source.

The max refresh rate of the human eye is about 50-60 for the average joe schmoe, there are about 4/100 on average that see at about 85-100 and 90-100 for avid gamers. Although at anything higher than 30 it really doesnt make too much of a difference as long as it is smooth at the fps and not jumpy.

Still images arent exactly the best way to prove your point....

Edit: I really don't think that this is true. Namely because if you took 100 people and made them stare at a spinning blade, and each were told to raise their hand when the blade appeared to stop spinning, all 100 would raise their hands at the same time.

the tv will never actually draw a literal new series of frames. Unless it's working with source material that it just found in some dumpster.

Oh yeah?

Thanks I needed the laugh. hahaha glad you proved my original point on both of your posts. Instead of citing marketing material maybe you can actually dig up something worthwhile?

I think I was pretty clear but you never know, maybe you'll go ahead and find a nice Samsung or Sony or Philips ad to shove in my face going "omg why would they lie?!?! they only want people to buy their units!"

It's not actual new material (which was my point) they're doing frame doubling merging images together and then padding it (Frame/Motion Interpolation). I'd love to see the source capture at 24/30/60/120hz so it would actually be viewable. Also the PowerDVD demo ruled, nice of them to readjust the levels on the video as well and claim it's an HD upgrade.

Do you realize what "upscaling" really is? It is NOT an HD upgrade. All it does is stretch the image to fit your screen instead of making the screen change its resolution to that of the video source. Motion interpolation is not as great as you're trying to make it sound. The buffed frames in between offer little to nothing as far as quality goes and the actual image quality of those frames is degraded compared to the others.

I actually vouch for the interpolation technology here. I have a 120 hz TV. I don't know if it's just me and a few others but I definitely notice the difference in the smoothness of the motion picture and I never see any degradation. Now I dont see why anyone would not want it. I think it's the awesomest part of my TV. I actually favor the fact it has that more than it being 1080p. I dont see why people wouldn't like this.

-------------------

If I ask you for sex, will your answer be the same as the answer to this question?

Actually that is just your LCD having a higher refresh rate to decrease motion blur. You may not realize this, but plasmas have a screen refresh rate between 800 and 1200 Hz, which is why they have no motion blur.

TVs that use motion interpolation are actually the 240Hz "TruMotion" TVs, and it looks like garbage.

Edit: I really don't think that this is true. Namely because if you took 100 people and made them stare at a spinning blade, and each were told to raise their hand when the blade appeared to stop spinning, all 100 would raise their hands at the same time.

Really? Have you had a test group do this or are you pulling assumptions from thin air? My guess is the latter since there is no evidence presented.

The thing is though, it doesnt stop. Do you happen to know how fast it is spinning or even if the films refresh rate is limited at 30?

I have used the 1080p upscaling in it and it works ok, it adds alot to the faces and bodies but the backgrounds still look just as crappy to me.

Obviously the video was for example purposes only... And it appears to stop.

An obvious example of you not bringing anything other than weak backing for your asinine arguments.Anyone with half a brain should realize that it doesn't stop and really didn't help prove your point. Yes, it appears to at some point but it could be moving at too fast a pace for even a 100 refreshes per second.You dont even know how fast it is spinning and you are trying to make a point from a guess.

Please bring something worthwhile to the table. Or at least something with a little thought.

Note to Guests: Advertising of any kind is not allowed in these forums!If you fix your problem on your own, please post a message describing how you fixed the issue so that others with a similar problem can use your method to fix their issue.