generallyso:This just sounds like justifying murder with "he used to beat me! No I don't have any evidence, why do you ask?"

If this is the case I think it is there is also no way to justify self defense by stabbing the guy thirteen times in the back while he is showering and then shooting him in the head while he is bleeding out./Or the other way around. Either way.

This very well could be the 4th installment of 50 shades of Grey. I haven't read the other 3 but could see the conclusion being grey trying to shove the ladies panties in her mouth at wich point she stas him 27 times, slits his throat, the shoots him in the head.

Of course you would have to add the part where he ties her to a tree and sticks it in her a...

If there's a case for Law and Order: SVU to 'rip from the headlines', it's this one. Last I heard, her defense was that she caught him looking at little boys on the computer so he beat her. And then he deleted the little-boy-photos so well that absolutely no trace of them can be found. Basically, her defense is that the man she murdered was a Holocaust-denying 9/11 pedophile.

Accusing a dead man of pedophilia without evidence (in a scenario where evidence would be easy to obtain, easy to hide, easy to keep and easy to give to the authorities for a serious crime). Is that the lowest thing someone can do besides actually being a pedophile? Is it worse? At least pedophilia is a disease and the pedophile probably feels bad about it.

ScouserDuck:This very well could be the 4th installment of 50 shades of Grey. I haven't read the other 3 but could see the conclusion being grey trying to shove the ladies panties in her mouth at wich point she stas him 27 times, slits his throat, the shoots him in the head.

Of course you would have to add the part where he ties her to a tree and sticks it in her a...

She looks like a cross between Octomom and that Texas woman who drowned her kids years ago. The reason she's going on about the sex is to have it recorded in court, then all she has to do is print it out and voila, best-seller.

I was listening about this on the radio. As she was delivering her testimony, the defense displayed -- on all the evidence video screens that surrounded the room, -- a picture of her ex-boyfriend's erect penis.

thatboyoverthere:generallyso: This just sounds like justifying murder with "he used to beat me! No I don't have any evidence, why do you ask?"

If this is the case I think it is there is also no way to justify self defense by stabbing the guy thirteen times in the back while he is showering and then shooting him in the head while he is bleeding out./Or the other way around. Either way.

Yup, this is that case. Except he stabbed was over 20 times, shot in the forehead, AND had his throat slit from ear to ear nearly decapitating him in the process.

She first claimed that she didn't know who killed him. Then she claimed that it was two people(a man and a woman) who came into his apartment and killed him while she was there and she fled scene even though she still managed to take her purse with her while all that was happening and she never called the cops. Then she claimed that she killed him in self defense after he abused her and/or she found child porn. This was after she said on some tv show that no jury would ever convict her since she didn't do it. She has since admitted killing him(in self-defense) and hopefully the jury is about to prove her wrong about not convicting her crazy ass. If her defense lawyer had an ounce of competence he would have been going for deminished capacity to begin with. So far I haven't been impressed with him though and she's about to go away for a long time.

draa:thatboyoverthere: generallyso: This just sounds like justifying murder with "he used to beat me! No I don't have any evidence, why do you ask?"

If this is the case I think it is there is also no way to justify self defense by stabbing the guy thirteen times in the back while he is showering and then shooting him in the head while he is bleeding out./Or the other way around. Either way.

Yup, this is that case. Except he stabbed was over 20 times, shot in the forehead, AND had his throat slit from ear to ear nearly decapitating him in the process.

She first claimed that she didn't know who killed him. Then she claimed that it was two people(a man and a woman) who came into his apartment and killed him while she was there and she fled scene even though she still managed to take her purse with her while all that was happening and she never called the cops. Then she claimed that she killed him in self defense after he abused her and/or she found child porn. This was after she said on some tv show that no jury would ever convict her since she didn't do it. She has since admitted killing him(in self-defense) and hopefully the jury is about to prove her wrong about not convicting her crazy ass. If her defense lawyer had an ounce of competence he would have been going for deminished capacity to begin with. So far I haven't been impressed with him though and she's about to go away for a long time.

One of the things she stated was she had caught her guy fapping to pictures of small boys in their underwear. So why hasn't anything like this been found during the investigation? The crazy biatch is using the time honored defense of "he hit me" and following it up with a pinch of "he's a a pedo". This used to work, but the general public has started to get sick of this shiat and now want evidence.

Really, nothing in this trial is particularly kinky. I guess this is the Mormon idea of kinky? This is regular old sexy time for most people, but it's being inflated into something OMG STRANGE because she murdered the guy, so he must have traumatized her with his OMG STRANGE activities. Geez, my husband and I were having phone sex as young teens thirty years ago, but no one heard about it because, oddly enough, we love each other and one of us didn't murder the other. It's pretty disgusting of the defense to be trotting all this stuff out, and probably making up half of it, like the little boys in their underwear thing, just to trash the murdered man.

She is stone cold guilty, because she was the "girl you fark but won't take home to mother" and she didn't like it so she killed him while he was in the shower.

thatboyoverthere:Man if that's true she should go away for the rest of her life.

I agree completely and that's the main reason she's facing the death penalty. And I've been following it on Court TV and it's correct. At least according to all the hosts they have covering it and from the evidence that's been presented during the trial so far. Plus, she seems to have zero remorse about what she did to that fellow so I'm sure she'll be gone soon enough.

FTFA: "He used her for sex in the bedroom and then when it came out in public he didn't even want to hardly acknowledge her."

I'd be happy to use her for sex and to acknowledge that in public. I've done far worse and lived to tell the tale (or not). But whether I go public with it or not would depend on who I was using for sex: if the particular Farkette wanted to keep it secret I might not even tell myself.

Unfortunately some woman might still stab me for something, like my "singing," which is justifiable. Can I help it if I'm hard of hearing, tone deaf and love to make up parody lyrics?

Well the first thing ya know Ol' Jed's a-turnin' gayAnd Jethro can't keep his paws off Ellie MayAnd poor ol' Granny she did not know what to doTill she took to smokin' crack and practicin' voodoo.