I like that. Then you have a nice three way between Lois, Batman, and Bruce, and can lead to a lot of character moments. I like the idea of Lois knowing Bruce is Batman without telling Clark her knowledge.

Like she's keeping it just to have some kind of leverage in case something happens. I'd also like it if in a Justice League movie she throws it in the garbage or shredder and some criminal pieces it together but dies mysteriously.

This sounds like a scenario from Pirates involving Jack Sparrow, Elizabeth, and Will.lol

(Batman jumps out, punching Lex out of the way, then carries Clark and Lois to safety)

That sounds too uniform, but I like it overall.
(Batman jumps out, punching Lex out of the way, who gets knocked back toward Lois, and he grabs her, holding her by her throat as a human shield. Superman strains and manages a tiny bit of heat vision near Lex. Lex taunts him for missing, then Batman sneaks behind Luthor. Luthor raises his gauntlets up to hit Batman, but Lois headbutts Luthor and knocks him out. Batman calms Lois, and puts the Kryptonite back into to the lead box.Superman thanks him, and then flies an unconscious Luthor near a tv station, in order to publicly humiliate him (like Luthor has tried to do earlier).

That's a nice three way attack. Supes isn't a total wimp, Batman is spared a walloping by Lois, and Superman is saved by Batman, but he also returns the favor by distracting Lex.

But I liked most of that description. It had a real sense of energy to it.

That sounds too uniform, but I like it overall.
(Batman jumps out, punching Lex out of the way, who gets knocked back toward Lois, and he grabs her, holding her by her throat as a human shield. Superman strains and manages a tiny bit of heat vision near Lex. Lex taunts him for missing, then Batman sneaks behind Luthor. Luthor raises his gauntlets up to hit Batman, but Lois headbutts Luthor and knocks him out. Batman calms Lois, and puts the Kryptonite back into to the lead box.Superman thanks him, and then flies an unconscious Luthor near a tv station, in order to publicly humiliate him (like Luthor has tried to do earlier).

That's a nice three way attack. Supes isn't a total wimp, Batman is spared a walloping by Lois, and Superman is saved by Batman, but he also returns the favor by distracting Lex.

But I liked most of that description. It had a real sense of energy to it.

Thanks I'm no script-writer but something like this would be great and introduces something new.

WF is two characters, who have each had successful movies in the recent past (or three in Batman's case). Thor and CA had never had movies and TA had six heroes (plus Fury, Hill, Coulson, Loki, etc). WF has two.

However, with the world's finest thing, I just think it's bad timing. It's like having the Avengers released right after "The Incredible Hulk" was shown.

It's true, I think Snyder needs to say more in interviews until we are eased into this. If Snyder/Goyer says that Batman won't interfere with Superman's own individual story and that we get a decent follow-up story to MOS+the presence of a one Lex Luthor then we would be more comfortable.

It doesn't change the fact that Superman should have gotten a sequel that didn't require Batman to be a part of it.

And the last time that Superman had a successful film was back in 1980 (before MOS I mean).

No matter how well some may word it on how Batman can serve the story better, that doesn't change the fact that Superman will not be getting a trilogy that's free of other major DC heroes.

After Batman is done here, he'll go on to have his own new trilogy once more and I can bet that he won't be having Superman drop by or any other major DC player that isn't a part of his own given universe and mythology.

MOS came out a month ago, that's pretty recent. Batman was in 2005, 2008, and 2012 respectively. There were never not going to be appearances by other heroes, Snyder made that clear. It was the same for the MCU.

It doesn't change the fact that Superman should have gotten a sequel that didn't require Batman to be a part of it.

And the last time that Superman had a successful film was back in 1980 (before MOS I mean).

No matter how well some may word it on how Batman can serve the story better, that doesn't change the fact that Superman will not be getting a trilogy that's free of other major DC heroes.

After Batman is done here, he'll go on to have his own new trilogy once more and I can bet that he won't be having Superman drop by or any other major DC player that isn't a part of his own given universe and mythology.

"Doesn't change the fact that Superman will not be getting a trilogy that's free of other major DC heroes." That's actually.. not as bad as you are making it out to be.

Comics tend to have heroes go in and out of the stories quite a bit. Sure, Batman will still have the nepotistical advantage on WB. But when one thinks about it, Superman can be more significant in the long run for laying new groundwork FOR more adaptations of OTHER heroes in the DCU.

Once MOS2 and or WF is out, DC will have pretty much maxed out the big two. I'm looking forward to the Flash, though I would STROoongly prefer a Wonder Woman movie first.

Just because they're kind of heavily touting a 'Batman vs. Superman' vibe and have registered the domain name BatmanVs.Superman.Com doesn't automatically mean that the film will be have that phrase in its title.

how does he lose w/o dying if you want to be all realism if a superman gut punch to a fellow kryptonian wearing kryptonian armor who has been used to the earth's sun would send him flying 10 feet into a car