A liberal douchebag showed how brave he was to harrass a Chick-fil-A employee

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Smith refers to having shown up at CFA to talk to Rachel again, and said that she refused to see him. Does that constitute stalking? Where's the restraining order?

Smith claimed that Vante had received death threats against employees. If so, there clearly would have been police reports filed, as such threats constitute criminal acts. If that had happened, the media would have been all over it, and we'd be seeing headlines about antigay hatemongers threatening Vante's innocent employees. NBC or one of their affiliates would have presented an edited version of Smith's video, without the gutter language, and followed it up with audio of the death threats from the voice mails at Vante, if they existed. So, where's the media report? Sounds like a video bouncy to me.

Smith seems to be sorry that he lost his job, but he doesn't really seem to be very sorry for his actions. He makes a number of excuses and continues to claim that CFA brought it on by not toeing his approved line on gay marriage. That's not remorse, it's calculation.

Smith's voice and mannerisms seem a bit... shall we say, effeminate. He claimed to be straight in his video bullying, but the more that I see of this guy, the less I believe it.

Well news reports I've read about this so-called apology, and some of them even go as far as saying it seemed disingenuous, stated he had a "Wife and children".

But it does seem like he does go out of the way to make it clear. "No gay in him". As if he's ether afraid some one might think he's gay. Or he's trying to re-assure him self he's not.

He's queer as a three dollar bill. He's fairly good at hiding his lisp, but it's there. If not gay, he has some effeminate qualities. I watched him "apologize" and it seemed contrived. His eyes were darting toward his visual creation corner where he dug up what he thought was an awesome apology. Still, if he is remorseful, it was big of him to attempt the apology.

Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.C. S. LewisDo not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:Ayn Rand

He's queer as a three dollar bill. He's fairly good at hiding his lisp, but it's there. If not gay, he has some effeminate qualities. I watched him "apologize" and it seemed contrived. His eyes were darting toward his visual creation corner where he dug up what he thought was an awesome apology. Still, if he is remorseful, it was big of him to attempt the apology.

I think he's bi and in a big way and he's trying to convince him self he there is no gay in him when there is. Why in two videos go to length to cover it?

Far as remorseful? I don't think so. I think he's more remorseful the entire world has turned on his "Moment of purpose". He's seen the late night comedians mock him. As well as read the web.

“That message: We’re sick and tired of being bullied — forced to adopt speech codes and politically correct policies and practices insisted upon by activist elites and lefty pols,” the Post wrote.

“Galvanized by social media (which the Left once thought it owned),” the editorial said, “they lined up for blocks all across the country to buy sandwiches at Chick-fil-A restaurants, intending to make their point quietly, politely — while taking care to bag their trash as they left. (Unlike some protestors we could name.)”

“Chick-fil-A sales set an all-time record . . . Take that, Orthodoxy Enforcers!”
Even across the border, editorial pages weighed in. The Globe and Mail of Toronto, Canada compared the Chick-fil-A uproar to the Boston Tea Party. “. . . the United States has found ways to turn common pantry items and luncheon meats into polarizing touchstones,” the paper wrote. “As always, the real issue is personal freedom.”

“Odd as it seems,” the Globe and Mail wrote, “there is a shared underlying theme to these American food wars. For the British subjects of pre-revolutionary Boston, the issue was the right to be taxed only by their elected representatives, not by the Parliament across the sea. For people on both sides of the Chick-fil-A war, which may not achieve the historical resonance of the Boston Tea Party, the issue is the right to live your beliefs without fear of sanction or discrimination…These are fundamental American values.”

And Linda Devore, writing in an op-ed in the Fayetteville Observer of North Carolina, said disagreeing with gay marriage doesn’t equate to hate speech.
“We all prefer to live in a world where offensive words and conduct are discouraged, but increasingly it seems that merely speaking the truth of one's beliefs is being labeled ‘hate speech’ by those looking for an offense,” Devore wrote. “Cathy's words and support of organizations promoting traditional family values don't even come close. He is a soft-spoken man who knows what he believes, and understands that others may disagree and live their lives otherwise,” she wrote, referring to Cathy.

Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.C. S. LewisDo not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:Ayn Rand

An Adam Smith of Tuscon, Arizona, donated $250 to Obama For America on May 10, 2012. This Smith listed his address as “Engineering and Research Associates Inc.” Engineering and Research Associates Inc. is the full business title of Vante. Is America’s most unpleasant Chick-fil-A customer also an Obama supporter? It’s interesting to note that the FEC records the donation as coming in on May 10 – that's one day after the President issued his formal support for gay marriage on May 9.