DCD wrote:if ken makes any money from this site it is peanuts.. the only ad ive ever seen on here is testmasters and it is by no means intrusive. the traffic, while impressive for a site dedicated to a bunch of law school nerds, is not the type that advertisers kill for. Also, I would say whatever he makes is quid pro quo for the time he/the mods put/puts in.

As I said, there are ads on the top and bottom of every page when you are not logged in. It is irrelevant how much Ken makes though, the point is that this is probably the reason that LSAC can enforce their copyright against him.

what the f are you guys talking about? You know Ken's rich via real estate, right? Whatever money he makes from this site, he's probably willing to burn it for fuel while laughing at those of us discussing his "cashflow" through this site.

bakemono wrote:what the f are you guys talking about? You know Ken's rich via real estate, right? Whatever money he makes from this site, he's probably willing to burn it for fuel while laughing at those of us discussing his "cashflow" through this site.

What are you talking about? Nobody claimed that this site makes a lot of money. The point is that it does generate revenue, however small an amount it may be, and this is probably relevant to the discussion of copyrighted LSAC material.

DCD wrote:right.. but movies are copyrighted too but you are still allowed to talk about them in broad strokes no? we are not reproducing, verbatim, any LSAT questions. Once again.. not being difficult.. Im happy to comply for the sake of the site.

they really should let people print the certifying statement instead of forcing people to write in cursive. i spent more time trying to figure out if i was drawing the letters correctly.

Q's and Z's are a real bitch. I am pretty sure I oversquiggled on some of my letters.