3) Idealization

All of us love to put other human beings up on a pedestal where we can imagine that they have the solution to all our problems, but it’s not real. Your mom may be wonderful, but she’s not a saint. That model may be hot, but you might not like her very much if she were 20 pounds heavier and had a bigger nose. If you were actually around your favorite musician or actor for a week, you might very well conclude that he is a self-centered jerk. It’s easy to think otherwise, but there’s a reason people say, “Familiarity breeds contempt.” That doesn’t necessarily mean that the more you get to know people the less you’ll like them, but it does mean that the idealized vision you have in your head is going to prove to be wrong in a number of ways that will make them less attractive than you had anticipated.

19 Comments, 12 Threads

Projection is the natural state of the leftist. Think of a Bill Clinton voter who accuses a generic Republican of sexism or someone who supported Robert Byrd as Senate Majority leader accuses a conservative of racism.

Or the Obama voter who thinks Mitt Romney is arrogant and untrustworthy, or the anthropogenic global warming advocate who thinks global warming skeptics are anti-science, or the left’s endless blaming of Bush.

I heard this a few days ago.
Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?
A: It’s Bush’s fault AND you’re a racist!!
It sure makes it easier if you don’t have to actually think about anything.

The people who most need to read this article, probably won’t read it at all; owing to defense mechanism 1, denial, the whole idea that they might need to improve is foreign to them. Alternatively, they will read it and immediately rub somebody else’s nose in the article, thereby implementing defense mechanism 2, projection.

The people who will take it the most to heart are those who already have made much progress in overcoming their personal failings.

There’re no such things as “instincts”. That’s just a fancy word used in place of the phrase “they just do it”. It tells us nothing about behavior – human or animal – and stops further investigation by giving the illusion of knowledge.

Indeed, biologically speaking, “instinct” refers to behaviors that ANY organism manifests that were not “learned” from interaction with other organisms of the same species. The list of such behaviors(including MANY in humans) is grand. Intelligence in nature is a self evident Truth, the fact that it often can not be “understood” by humans does not detract from it’s reality. Appreciating that organisms behave largely instinctually does not deter “further investigation” of anything.

I guess you never woke up from a nightmare then? Were never scared of the dark as a child? Never jumped when a sudden loud noise was introduced into your existence? The concept of the brain being reflexively protective of the body without predisposition is precisely the concept (if not a precise definition) of an instinctive response.

Newsflash, Cochise: all of these things are instinctual, and all serve to provide the human creature with the longest possible lifespan.

Incredible: give somebody access to a computer and suddenly they’re Yoda, Jesus, and every other icon of wisdom rolled into one package….

That’s how the left operates: compensation (changing the subject; “oh, but we’re soooo compassionate), denial (the economy is doing just fine; our social programs work), projection (often in the form of simple name-calling as well as outright libel, slander, and perjury), idealization (of their leaders and of their protected victim classes), and displacement (less obvious as a rhetorical tactic, but you can see government bureaucrats as well as teachers taking out their frustrations on the public and on their charges).

I figure most of them will use this as a how-to guide rather than as an avenue to self-improvement.

Me? Thirty years ago. I was the most ignorant and biggest fool who ever came down the road…and I didn’t know it. Everyone else, however, knew that I was an ignorant fool, except for myself. I was also as impatient a man as you’ve ever seen. I ued to hang around with people who were just like I Was. Always reinforcing one another’s ignorance, arrogance and foolishness, never learning anything new.

These days, I know that I’m the biggest fool who ever came down the road. …and after reading a lot of books, and attending a lot of classes and seminars in a variety of fiels and disciplines, I’m fairly sure that I’m as ignorant as they come. The more I learn, the more I learn that there is more to be learned than any man can learn in a thousand, thousand lifetimes. That, my friends, is a humbling thought. otoh, my friends now think that I’m one of the wisest and most intelligent people they’ve ever known. They also accuse me of being the most patient man they’ve ever known. That’s what they say, anyway.

That sort of thing happens when you stop blaming everyone and everything else for your own problems and start examining your own motivations, emotions and reactions…and start learning how to deal with them. It will change your world-view. No. It isn’t easy, especially at first. It’s damned uncomfortable, actually.

I’m still the biggest fool I’ve ever known…and I know that I’m as impatient as anyone I’ve ever met.

Examine yourselves, first. Mote. Log. Eye. That sort of thing. Which is what young Mr. Hawkins is really saying, here. (He seems to be very wise for such a young man.)

It’s not a matter of beating yourself up. It’s a matter of learning the true extent of your own weaknesses and the limitations of your many and varied strengths. ‘Know thyself and you’ll know others better,’ as the old saw goes.

Yeah, the lefties are a mess, causing all sorts of problems. The question at hand isn’t about where the lefties are screwing up. The question is: What are you righties doing wrong – where, when and why – as individuals and as a group?

I think that contrary to the image of the average man as un-self-aware, most people of average intelligence are well aware that they are flawed beings. That they lose sight of the defense mechanisms mentioned in this article from time to time in the heat of battle so to speak doesn’t mean they’re dim bulbs that have to be managed by puffed up experts. All it means is that they know their weaknesses but momentarily forget them or can’t overcome them. With the exception of psycopaths, a distinct minority, most people muddle through flaws and all and are a lot better off without the supervisor class.

My personal favorite is denial and its two sides: When denial leads you to ignore some unpleasant reality, you may regret the existence of such a terrible handicap to reason. But when you exercise your power of abstraction, which may be seen as a precious asset in your intellectual arsenal, you are also shutting whatever reality might derail the present creative train of thought.

So, is denial a bad thing or a good thing? Both? Neither? It’s one of these things we have to deal with, whether we recognize it or not. Adam and Eve originally did not recognize it, and they wound up showing what happens after you do! Arrrrgh…

Legarto, would you list some of those many behaviors that you say are instincts in human beings? I can’t think of any that could be proven to be unlearned. The fact that “instinct” is loosely used, or used connotatively, to describe some human behaviors, doesn’t prove a thing. By definition an instinct is “an inborn pattern of behavior common to a biological species.