Marc’s upcoming interview with the Scottsdale police chief this Thursday.

Calling out the flipid attitude from what are supposed to be mature, professional adults.

Airing on the side of caution and being cooperative when handling roadside bureaucratic legal attacks conducted by men in costumes who believe they can, and should, use whatever force they deem necessary to gain compliance from their victim.

Steven from CA: if you accept a plea-bargain, then are you actually accepting jurisdiction and that the laws DO apply? <> everybody in court was being offered a plea-bargain deal <> judges says that bringing in phone records proving a phone was not in use “wasn’t enough to prove [the defendant’s] innocence” of violating an “operating-a-vehicle-while-on-the-phone” citation <> complaint letter filed against a judge for their misconduct will be promptly white-washed and “thank you for bringing it to our attention” generic response <> the judge flips the burden of proof from the prosecutor and cop to the defendant <> the cop begins to fabricate a story to present to the court [hiding behind the badge] to obfuscate his wrongful actions <> & the judge reduced the fines of other non-questioners by half.

Al from CA: reply back from the city of Chino Hills on whether there is any empirical evidence to prove the laws apply [possible SoLWT report?] <> the judge says a street sweeping citation is neither civil or criminal, but rather an administrative hearing <> & role-playing to prepare for a court date this week.

Fred from CA: challenging a parking ticket for parking at a faded, barley red, curb <> in the appeals process you are guilty until proven innocent <> if the witness is not present for the court proceeding, should you motion to dismiss? <> using physical evidence that disproves the prosecutor’s assertions as a back-up in case the court steamrolls over jurisdictional challenges <> raising the issue of a fair and impartial hearing when its discovered there’s a conflict of interest <> when to file a motion to dismiss for the prosecution failing to produce evidence by a certain deadline <> requiring the prosecution fully and factually prove standing and a valid cause for action <> & taking the prosecutor to small claims court for hardships and losses.

Jamie from MN: challenging a “temporary handicap parking zone” citation <> court officer laughs the questioning defendant out of court <> prepping for court by doing diligent research and role-playing to be comfortable and capable making objections to their non-responsive and/or fallacious answers <> residual statist conditioned and triggered guilt <> what are the essential elements of a valid cause for action, corpus delecti, and standing to complain? <> using a media-rep and/or assistence, a.k.a. McKenzie friend in court <> & the assertion that appearing as a defendant is accepting the court’s jurisdiction.

Art from NY: challenging roadside bureaucratic attacks from the likes of the “NY limousine and taxi unit” <> faux courts revenue-milling submitizens through the legal-land meat grinder <> & why chauffeurs do not need to comply with the permit and regulatory demands of the STATE.

Ayrlahn from MN: judge dismisses case where the defendant was arrested and mistreated for refusing to submit to fingerprinting on the grounds of “no probable cause” <> confronting county attorney about the multiple points of failure of procedure with enforcement of their laws <> & bureaucrats work for citizens and they must comply with their mandate to produce requested evidence and documents.

10 Comments For This Post

These parking tickets in California are just filed with a private corporation, the one in la is a subsidiary of xerox corp. The tickets are not filed with any California court system. The private corporate kangaroo courts will not tell you specifically who is responsible for the administrative review, they just say it was someone from that department who they wont let you talk to.

The “parking violations bureau” is a privately held for profit corporation “ACS” which they try to hide. They mail out letters with the letterhead caption of the city attorney to give the impression that there is some sort of legal process, but when I called the city attorney the guy I talked to said that department has nothing to do with the letter, and ACS goonsquad aka
“parking violations bureau” admits the letter is from them(it has their phone number on it)

DAMN corruption! It’s EVERYWHERE, I tell you – EVERYWHERE! It’s the devil. I’m sure of it. I was born pure. Pure I tell you. But I can see this corruption all around me. It’s a sin. It’s pure evil. OUT! OUT! OUT!!! (oh. oops. i didn’t think the mic was on. nevermind.)

Marc – Resently I was issued a traffic citation for speeding and I signed it “Without prejudice”. a few weeks later I went to court. I put the officer on the witness stand and asked him if he had proof that he issued me a citatioon. The officer said “yes” and said he had the original copy of the citation with my signature on it. The judge asked for the original citation, to be used as evidence.

I objected to the document being used as evidence, because the term “Without prejudice” was written on the document, and that the Supreme court cases of Ferry v. Taylor 33 Mo. 323, Durgin v. Somers, 117 Mass 55, Molyneaux v. Collier 13 Ga. 406 have all determined that documents Signed “Without Prejudice” are Not Admissible as Evidence. Here is the ruling:

“It may, however, be considered settled that letters or admissions containing the expression in substance that they are to be ‘without prejudice’ will not be admitted in evidence…an arrangement stating the letter was without prejudice was held to be inadmissible as evidence … not only will the letter bearing the words, “without prejudice” but also the answer thereto, which was not so guarded, was inadmissible …”.

The judge wouldn’t allow the citation to be used as evidence. The officer didn’t have any other substantial evidence; (other than his word) that he issued me a ticket.

I moved for dismissal for lack of evidence. The judge dismissed my charge.

Calvin and Marc, At about 1 hour, 20 minutes, Marc explains to Jamie from Minnesota the meaning and elements in a cause of action. This is the best explanation I’ve ever heard from Marc and I suggest you consider making this portion of the show a separate small audio file which might be filed on the website as reference material and which we can link to from the Wiki. I don’t know if there is an appropriate section of the website for this kind of material. If none exists it might be worth creating a place for audio and video reference materials. – NonE

1 Trackbacks For This Post

[…] Art from NY: the effective use of the unsigned plea of guilty to avoid them claiming you are “refusing to enter a plea” <> threatening prosecutors suggesting their victims to cower and follow their orders <> the prosecutor and judge do not like to give grounds for some of their key denials and rulings <> understanding the nature of the collusion between the judge and the prosecutor <> the judge left the building after finishing with the lawyers, leaving the rest of the defendants for the court clerks/staff to extort <> cops pushing for plea bargains and making decisions on behalf of the defendant in court <> and no responses from anyone from the court on the filed paperwork. […]

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Upcoming Events

Saturday, August 8th, 2015, 4-7pm EST: Marc returns for another edition of the No STATE Project radio show. Feel fr33 to call-in with your thoughts on tickets, tyrants, assessments, activism, anarchy, agorism, or, of course; any and all criticisms. If you are being attacked by those with arbitrary titles and shiny badges, or if you have an interesting observation or criticism; then please call into the LIVE show at (218) 632-9399, or we can skype you in during a break. You'll need to contact Marc on Skype by searching for username: frankrizzo3, and we can also add you to the NSP skype group chat where you can engage in some courtroom role-play exercises to refine your litigation skills and boost your confidence if you have a court hearing coming up. Also, here is a comprehensive list of the many ways you can interact with the No STATE Project broadcast and community.

If you want to join the forum, you must email me a username so I can create the account. This is to stop the flood of spambots.