Forum rules
1. Nothing obscene.2. No advertising or spamming. 3. No personal information. Mostly aimed at the posting of OTHER people's information.4. No flame wars. We encourage debate, but it becomes a flame when insults fly and tempers flare.

Try to stick with the forum's topic. Threads that belong to another forum will be moved to that forum.

I'm not sure what the issue is, but acrobat really doesn't like the file you guys sent me. The only thing I've seen act similar is a ten year old computer trying to display a 200mb file, which considering that I've got a new machine running a very small file is weird.

The comp had to think about it for well over fifteen seconds before displaying the cover page picture.

It's still readable, just reporting an odd experience.

TAG: As I understand it, he sought to avoid turning one-point-six trillion Terran sophonts into undead, war-mongering super-soldiers.Captain Tagon: It it wrong for me to think that would be pretty cool to watch?

Club wrote:I'm not sure what the issue is, but acrobat really doesn't like the file you guys sent me. The only thing I've seen act similar is a ten year old computer trying to display a 200mb file, which considering that I've got a new machine running a very small file is weird.

The comp had to think about it for well over fifteen seconds before displaying the cover page picture.

It's still readable, just reporting an odd experience.

I had that happen with the original image... it's huge. Maybe it got uncompressed or something? I'll look into it.

wievil wrote:Wasn't expecting a link with a time limit. Never was sent anything other than an attachment before.

I've only recieved the one order reply last Friday. Nothing seen since.

Hmmmm. Ok, well I'm sending you another here in a minute or two. Just remember to check your email

This is kind of embarrassing. How do you figure out which version of SSF you have? The Credit section of my copy has the line "Special Credit for SOLAR STARFIRE version 6.02.201301", and each page has the footer "SSF-201307".

During production we ended up using two different identifiers for the versions of the rules. The main one is 6.02 and represents the version. The SSF-201307 is more of a build version of 6.02 and shows roughly when it published.

dazrand wrote:During production we ended up using two different identifiers for the versions of the rules. The main one is 6.02 and represents the version. The SSF-201307 is more of a build version of 6.02 and shows roughly when it published.

One is the version including the date we stopped adding new stuff to the rules, and the other is the release date.