Posts tagged ibuprofen

There are certain questions that shouldn’t need to be asked. Which, if they come up, are a sign that there is something deeply wrong with the kind of conversation that you’re having. Here’s an example of one, which recently appeared in my Google News feed:

For background on this case, which I’ve discussed here before when it was before the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, see GT 2007-10-02: Public schooling. The story is back in the news because the case has reached the Supreme Court.

If you think that there is any reasonable debate to be had about whether it could possibly be legitimate or appropriate for government school officials to corral an unwilling 13-year-old girl into the school nurse’s office, then force her to undergo a humiliating strip-search, all in order to serve the Compelling State Interest of making sure that she wasn’t covertly carrying any ibuprofen on her person — and, this is, apparently, something that the most distinguished jurists of the government of the United States of America believe — then I will say that there is something deeply wrong with the kind of conversations that you are having about 13 year old girls, their rights, the role of schools in a humane society, and the prerogatives of the State. By the time you get around to trying to answer a question like that, it’s already too late; the fact that it was ever open for you says more than enough about you, and about the masters that you serve.

6 comments on GT 2009-04-23

Nick Manley:
ACLU video, everyone.
https://secure.aclu.org/site/SPageServer?pagename=NatSupportSavanaVideo&s_src=shortcut
Note how intellectually mature this 13 year old is -- was not aware that 13 year olds are …
[2009-04-23 4:28:56 pm]

One of the worst things about so-called public education, i.e. government-controlled schooling, is that students are forced into an institution that they consistently find unpleasant and boring, whether or not the individual student thinks that it’s worth the trouble. That fact, combined with the fact that the victims are all young and many of them are poor or black or otherwise marked as at-risk youth in need of special surveillance and control, naturally and systematically corrupts the way that the school relates to its students. It leads administrators and political decision-makers to focus on restraining the unruly behavior of the coerced students, by making authority, control, security, and discipline top priorities. In practice this means monitoring, intimidation, and coercion. These facts in turn result in attitudes and institutional practices throughout State schools that are often hard to distinguish from those prevailing in a prison camp.

Here are three stories that have come out, just over the course of the past week, about the practices of administrators and uniformed thugs in American public schools. In particular, they are about three separate cases in which one or the other set out to maintain control over their school by physically brutalizing or sexually humiliating young women.

The first case, from Arizona, happened four years ago. It’s in the news today because the famously liberal Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of appeals recently ruled that Safford Middle School officials were within the bounds of their legitimate authority when they forced a strip-search on a 13 year old girl — because a couple of student snitches claimed that she had some unauthorized ibuprofen on her, and the Authorities had to know for sure:

Safford Middle School officials did not violate the civil rights of a 13-year-old Safford girl
when they forced her to disrobe and expose her breasts and pubic area four years ago while
looking for a drug, according to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling.

The justices voted 2-1 in favor of the Safford School District on Sept. 21. The decision
upheld a federal district court’s summary judgement that Safford Middle School Vice Principal
Kerry Wilson, school nurse Peggy Schwallier and administrative assistant Helen Romero did
not violate the girl’s Fourth Amendment rights on Oct. 8, 2003, when they subjected her
to a strip search in an effort to find Ibuprofen, an anti-inflammatory drug sold over the
counter and in prescription strengths.

…

The girl’s mother filed a federal law suit against the district and Middle School officials
because they forced her daughter to strip down to her underwear then move her bra and
panties in such a way that her breasts and pubic area were exposed. The mother also
asserts that she was not notified of the impending search.

In the opinion written by Judge Richard Clifton, Based on the information available to
them, defendants (Safford School District, Wilson, Schwallier and Romero) had
reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search of (the girl’s) person would turn
up evidence that (the girl) had violated or was violating either the law or the rules of the
school.

Clifton wrote that Wilson and the others had reasonable grounds for believing the girl had
Ibuprofen based on conversations with two other students.

The other students said the girl possessed Ibuprofen and had distributed the drug to others,
according to the court report.

The second case is from New York, where — in order to enforce a blanket no-bags policy putatively adopted for the students own health and safety — a member of the school goon squad decided that it was O.K. for him, an adult male ex-cop, to pull 14 year old girls carrying purses out of class and interrogate them about their menstrual cycles:

Grahamsville — Several television news crews from New York City are camped outside the
Tri-Valley Central School following the story in today’s Times Herald-Record about what
question a school security guard asked a 14-year-old female student.

The girl was called out of class by a security guard during a school sweep last week to make
sure no kids had backpacks or other banned bags.

She says he told her she couldn’t have a purse unless she had her period. Then he asked,
Do you have your period?

Samantha was mortified.

She says she thought, Oh, my God. Get away from me. But instead of answering,
she just walked back into class.

At home, she cried, and told her mother what happened.

It appears that at least a few other girls were also asked the same question.

On Sept. 21, Martin and other girls were called to the office of Principal Robert Worden. Lisa
Raymond, the assistant superintendent for business, was also there, Martin said.

They just asked me what he (Bunce) said. I told them, and they said thanks for
coming, she said.

The small Sullivan County school has been in an uproar for the last week. Girls have worn
tampons on their clothes in protest, and purses made out of tampon boxes. Some boys wore
maxi-pads stuck to their shirts in support.

After hearing that someone might have been suspended for the protest, freshman Hannah
Lindquist, 14, went to talk to Worden. She wore her protest necklace, an OB tampon box on
a piece of yarn. She said Worden confiscated it, talked to her about the code of conduct
and the backpack rule — and told her she was now part of the problem.

Tri-Valley Superintendent Nancy George, who has refused to meet with any reporters today,
yestedar said that when Worden, Bunce and another staffer did the bag check, they were
telling students to put the bags in their lockers. The administration is investigating whether
they said anything more to some girls.

I have had some parents talk to me personally, and they gave me the names of some
students who were asked, she said. We’re certainly not going to make light of this.
It’s a very sensitive issue, but it needs to be handled. Parents with more information
should call her directly, she added.

Raymond and Worden failed to return calls yesterday for comment. Bunce was not working
yesterday, and his home phone number is unlisted.

Bunce was forced to retire from the Monticello Police Department in 2002 after he and the
former chief were caught running their process-serving business on village time.

School board President Lori Mickelson declined comment.

The school banned backpacks in the halls this year for two reasons, George said: Student
health, because heavy bags could hurt the kids’ backs or people could trip on them; and for
security concerns, felt nationwide, about concealed weapons.

Clearly the Authorities concerns about small purses and their contribution teenagers’ back problems outweigh minor considerations like the dignity and sexual privacy of 14 year old girls.

The third case comes from Palmdale, California, near Los Angeles, where a member of the school goon squad slammed Pleajhai Mervin, a young black woman at Knight High School, down on a table, twisted her arm behind her back, and broke her wrist — after she refused to follow his bellowed orders to make a fourth try at cleaning up the last bits of a slice of cake that she had accidentally spilled on the lunchroom floor. According to Mervin, the uniformed thug yelled hold still nappy head at her during the course of the attack. The fifteen-year-old young woman was then ticketed for littering, expelled from school, and arrested for battery against the beefy uniformed security thug who was breaking her wrist while other security goons hovered around. Two other black students — a 14 year old boy and his 16 year old sister — were tackled, held down, shoved around, handcuffed, and arrested for daring to film what was going on using their cell phone cameras.

School security guards in Palmdale, CA have been caught on camera assaulting a
16-year-old girl and breaking her arm after she spilled some cake during lunch and left some
crumbs on the floor after cleaning it up.

… The girl, Pleajhai Mervin, told Fox News LA that she was bumped while queuing for lunch
and dropped the cake. After being ordered to clean it up and then re-clean the spot three
times, she attempted to leave the area out of embarrassment but was jumped on by
security who forced her onto a table, breaking her wrist in the process.

Mervin says a security guard slammed her against a table at a lunchroom at the high school
and twisted her arms behind her back so violently, he broke her wrist. Her wrist is in a cast.

He put my arm behind my back and he started raising it until it hurt, so I told him,
Stop, it hurts. He had slammed me on the table and told me to hold still. He called
me a nappy-head, and that’s when I just started crying, said Mervin.

Mervin claims she was roughed up simply because she failed to pick up every crumb of a
birthday cake she accidentally dropped on the floor of the lunchroom during a lunch-hour
birthday celebration for a friend. She says she thought she cleaned up the mess, but the
security guard thought otherwise.

He said, You have to come pick the rest of this cake up. So I said, I picked
it up. He gets on his walkie-talkie, he got a call, so I just started walking to class, and
that’s when he grabbed me, said Mervin.

Mervin says when the security guard realized he was being videotaped, he tackled the
student shooting the video. She says another student captured photographs of that
incident. She says the whole incident was unnecessary.

One security guard twisted the arm of 16-year-old Pleajhai Mervin behind her back and
slammed her against a lunch table, fracturing her wrist, parents said.

I want justice, said Mervin’s mother, Latrisha Majors, who also was arrested. I
want justice for my daughter. I want the guards to be held accountable for their
actions.

Majors and her daughter were arrested in the Sept. 18 lunchtime incident, along with Joshua
Lockett, 14, who videotaped the fight, and his sister, Kenngela Lockett, 16, who also
suffered a fractured wrist.

Both Mervin and Kenngela Lockett attended the protest with their arms in slings.

Joshua Lockett, who was on probation for robbery, remained in juvenile custody on suspicion
of violating his probation, sheriff’s deputies said.

We come to get an education, not to be hurt by security guards, said Kenngela,
who said she tried to pull guards off her brother and was hurt while being handcuffed.

One guard, whose name has not been publicly released, has been placed on leave with pay
pending an investigation by the Antelope Valley Union High School District. Attempts to
reach the guard were not successful.

Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies said the guard told them he felt threatened by
Mervin.

There was resistance by her, Sgt. Darrel Brown said. He went to control
her.

Mainstream media sources such as the Los Angeles Times, KABC in Los Angeles, KSN (a local NBC affiliate), and the LA Daily News have repeatedly described what happened as a tussle … between a security guard and three students, as a scuffle with security guards,a melee with security guards,mayhem, etc. This apparently is what passes for accurate description of a professional uniformed security goon battering two high school girls and a fourteen-year-old boy, while he’s backed up by another security goon hovering around the area and clearly outweighs all of his victims. You can watch part of Joshua Lockett’s video of the scuffle at MyFox Los Angeles (2007-09-26) and MyFox Los Angeles (2007-09-28).

Oh No A WoC PhD (2007-09-30) has a YouTube montage of more photos and videos from this so-called melee, and also the contact information for school and city officials.

State schooling, institutional racism, blanket zero-tolerance policies, and increasing police and security presence in schools have ensured that many if not most American schools are no longer primarily places of learning. They are guarded institutions whose primary focus is on command and control.

This isn’t to say that Australia’s EC situation is advanced over that of the United States in every respect. One major difference is that whereas the medical community in America largely supports the FDA’s move towards OTC availability, the medical community in Australia is at best nervous about the move, and in some cases directly opposed. The main issue for them, though, seems not to be the sort of religious Kulturkampf that flares around the American side of the debate. Rather, Australian doctors just seem to be more accustomed than American doctors to controlling the medical lives of their patients, and more jealous at giving up that power. For example, consider this Foucaultian bit of paternalism:

But Australian Medical Association president Bill Glasson said he was concerned that pharmacists were not legally required to record a woman’s visit.

I think that they really need to rediscuss how it is going to operate in the interest of good medical care, Dr Glasson said.

The pharmaceutical society’s national president, Jay Hooper, said many pharmacists would take it upon themselves to record each time a woman wanted the pill.

Not that American doctors don’t also sometimes engage in this tracking and scummy hectoring. At the Auburn University Student Health Center, for example, you could obtain EC—but they’d note when you got it, throw a bunch of red tape in your way, and if I recall correctly, they’d only let you have it once a semester. (The idea in both cases is for doctors to be able to lecture women that they decide are making unhealthy lifestyle choices. I am all for encouraging women to make healthy lifestyle choices, but I can’t imagine that an emergency situation to prevent a pregnancy is the appropriate time to do it, or that forcing women to listen by restricting access to EC until you’re done lecturing them is the appropriate way to go about it.) But the American medical community does not seem particularly squeamish about giving up that control if it means that women are more able to prevent unwanted pregnancies: the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists both lobbied for, and strongly supported, the FDA advisory panels’ decision. In Australia, however, the Australian Medical Association seems nervous and is ready to develop their own house guidelines to try to minimize the freedom it will offer women.

I don’t think, incidentally, that the attitude is a matter of misogyny, exactly. But it is directly connected to patriarchy—it’s a matter of the authoritarian sense of entitlement that modern doctors have always felt and acted out vis-a-vis their patients. The condition exists in Australia and America both, but with regard to over-the-counter pills the Australian medical community seems to have divorced itself from it less than their American counterparts. Consider: at the same time as EC becomes available over the counter for the first time in Australia, so will ibuprofen. And this has caused no small degree of consternation for the Australian Medical Association:

Also from Thursday stronger pain relief medication will be available in supermarkets, a move that has angered and confused doctors and pharmacists. Dr Glasson said the pain killer ibuprofen, contained in products including Nurofen, should only be sold under the supervision of pharmacists. It’s a dangerous move and it’s a backward step.

Patients have to look at the medical aspects of these drugs and get good advice that only the friendly pharmacist can give. Paracetamol is much kinder on the stomach.

Ibuprofen, an anti-inflammatory drug, was only available in pharmacies until the Government ratified the new regulations in October.

…

Products containing ibuprofen have been available in supermarkets in the US since 1984 and in Britain since 1996.

The teeming masses of Ozzies will now be able to buy Advil without a doctor’s learned advice! O tempora! O mores!

But however the doctors and pharmacists may whine, the women of Australia have every reason to celebrate. A happy New Year’s to the reproductive rights community in Australia — good show!

Coalitions of the Willing

This site is designed to be accessible for any web device, including text-only browsers and browsers with aids for users with visual or motor disabilities. For details, see the accessibility statement for radgeek.com.