The APOEL miracle continues…

The clear outsider in a very strong group coming into the tournament, APOEL now find themselves top of Group G after a 2-1 win over Porto.

There was an element of fortune to their victory over Porto last night. Having deservedly got themselves into a 1-0 lead, they were content to sit on that slender advantage going into the final minutes. A rash challenge and a Hulk penalty later, they look like they’d blown their chance. But APOEL showed character to get up the pitch and score a 90th minute to clinch the win.

Coach Ivan Jovanovic prefers a 4-2-3-1 shape, and in simple terms there is relatively little unusual about the side.

Defence

The back four is as you would expect – the full-backs are converted wingers but not overly attack-minded. With APOEL tending to play quickly on the break, there was often no need for overlapping runs to stretch the play – the front four were left to create chances themselves.

Midfield

The midfield duo were interesting – unlike, say, Uruguay, they didn’t remain particularly close together throughout the game, and pivoted across the pitch to a great extent. When the play went down one flank, the holder on that side would move out a long way towards the wing to assist the play. The other covered in the centre. This isn’t particularly unusual, but it was notable how the movement was always out to the flank, not forward towards the strikers.

Wingers

The wide players were crucial to APOEL’s good attacking moves – but not in the traditional sense. They would start relatively deep, and pull the Porto full-backs towards them, high up the pitch out of position. This created space for their front two to move into down the flanks, and then the ball was played past the wingers, they’d turn and sprint to provide support.

Attack

The movement from Ailton upfront was extremely impressive. He spent the time working the channels (and with the full-backs high up the pitch, the flanks), almost never picking up the ball in the centre. He has a great burst of pace and a good first touch, making him perfect for nipping in ahead of centre-backs and spinning in behind. He tended to pick up the ball in deep positions on the right flank, and then when moving to the left he tried to get on the end of balls over the top.

The reason for that difference was probably because the attacking central midfielder, Ivan Trickovski, tended to move towards the left. Therefore Ailton didn’t need to come short for the ball and could make runs in behind. Trickovski, incidentally, is able to play on either flank or through the middle – having played two games from the right in the Champions League this season, here he started in the middle and then switched with Manduca at half-time.

Ailton can’t be depended on for link-up play – he received 32 passes, but then only attempted 16, of which 8 were completed. In other words, when he gets the ball he only passes 50% of the time, and only keeps a move going 25% of the time. He’s a bit El-Hadji Diouf at the World Cup in 2002. In winning (and scoring) the penalty, however, he did his job upfront well.

The movement of the front two across the pitch, with the wingers moving forward, meant triangles down the flanks formed naturally. Porto struggled to get men over to stop these moves – the central midfielders couldn’t get out in time, whilst the wide forwards stayed up the pitch. None of the Porto backline had a good game individually.

The away side did form a good offside trap, catching APOEL offside ten times. Early on the forwards seemed to be moving too early, but the ball could have arrived much quicker from the centre of midfield – often the passer took an extra touch and allowed the defence to step up. A little more speed in these attacks, and APOEL could have got in behind much more.

Overall strategy

APOEL’s position are the top of the group is down to their attacking efficiency. They average the least possession (43%) in a very counter-attacking group, and average just eight shots a game, compared to Porto’s 22, Zenit’s 20 and Shakhtar’s 14. They don’t attack much, but they attack well.

They were guilty of being too conservative in the second half against Porto, though. They were clearly threatening Porto with pace in behind the defence, and the switch to a more conservative style meant the away side could throw men forward without fear of being exposed on the break. The decision to remove Ailton – who may have been tired – for centre-back Sanel Jahic on 77 minutes was a particularly negative move, and one sensed that APOEL would regret that change. They did – for a brief moment – before the late goal.

As far as weaknesses go, the way to get at APOEL would probably be to try and flood the centre of the pitch, forming a 3 v 2 against the two holding midfielders – Trickovski doesn’t look as if he wants to do much defensive work. That said, Zenit would be the perfect side to create triangles around those two players with their fluid midfield trio, and they too lost 2-1 in Nicosia. The return fixture between the sides, in St Petersburg, takes place in three weeks.

Great piece. Porto’s shots were totally threatless. Most of their shots were weak from far outside the box. Especially (the now blonde) Hulk would shoot from just about anywhere causing no real trouble to the keeper. Apoel on the other hand was causing chaos everytime they went in front especially with Ailton’s runs.

They have the potential to perform great and be at least in the final 8 of the CL. The proof of that is last season’s spectacular run.

NOTE: I don’t mean to disrespect APOEL. They have a very good team. They are quite organized and i’m not surprsied with their performenaces so far. What surprises me is the horrible performances of Porto, Shaktar and Zenith and the fact that they underestimated the cipriot champions
But they are slow (very slow)in buil-up play and make far too many defensive mistakes.

I don’t think it’s a tactical problem, neither the lack of good players and the staff is almost the same. But somehow they suck.

Can the absence of a single player (Radamel Falcao) affect an entire team and its build-up process, even though we’re talking about a CF?? I remember last season that when he was injuried in January and February Porto struggled to perform well and I also remember you saying that the main problem of the 4×3x3 is that the teams struggles when they lack its main CF.

Do you think Falcao’s absence is the origin of Porto’s lack of form? Or is it the absence of André Villas Boas motivation that is putting the likes of Hulk, J.Moutinho, Rolando, Varela, Belluschi and Guarin out of form?

What do you think ZM? I’d like to hear your opinion about this subject.

Fred on November 3, 2011 at 7:00 am

I think they may have lost their offensive focus. Hulk is trying to force the issue too much now that he doesn’t have Falcao to pass to.

Granted, if AVB was still their he might have been able to mitigate that issue… We can’t know for sure

Tbh I think this has more to do with porto not controlling the game like they should have done. They played 3 CM’s yet didnt really dominate the midfield. While they also didnt deal with the threat of ailton well enough, they just really had to let him have the ball, he wasnt going to cause much harm, it was more his movement, so porto should have just stayed in position, with ailton constantly moving outwide, this would have stopped the threat.

Yeah why would one want to write about the only vague surprise story of the competition? Should have done Barca or Real thrashing someone

sibelkacem on November 2, 2011 at 10:17 pm

Hi! I think there is really no need to respond to such irrational arguments as presented by hutman, because they beat themselves up . Cheers.

snowman on November 2, 2011 at 11:03 pm

Cinderella stories are one of the things that make people love sport. Review the reasons behind unexpected success is fascinating and you do very well.

Now speaking of Real Madrid, I noticed that you did not cover much of their game recently (or maybe its just an impression because I’m a fan), is it mostly because they are a fairly unspectacular team tactically (ie: 4-2-3-1 and use the technical and physical qualities of the player to win) or because you expect most of their game not be competitive? This is by no mean a complain but I was wondering.

In any event, keep up the good work, I really enjoy your reviews.

Anonymous on November 3, 2011 at 1:30 am

To be perfectly honest the Champions League group stage is kind of a waste of time.

Bring back the 70s format!! (But with runners-up as well)

Anonymous on November 3, 2011 at 1:32 am

and also, I was wondering when ZM would take notice of APOEL’s strength this season.

Who cares about Barcelona humping Valladolid 8-0 ? Seriously, I don’t get Spanish league fanboys, its just the SPL writ large

ryan on November 9, 2011 at 5:51 am

Your a fucking retard mate,your obviously a brainwashed EPL fan who thinks his league is the best.

Valladolid haven’t been in La Liga for years so it’s obvious you don’t even watch La Liga and just copy what the sky pundits say.

I too, was waiting for an acknowledgement of this underrated Cinderella team’s surprising results. Documenting one team’s thrashing, another team’s draw, and yet another team’s near miss are all entertaining. Keep up the good work.