Detecting Lung Cancer – Thinking Outside the Tumor

Scientists in Anant Madabhushi's computational imaging lab at Case Western Reserve University have started thinking outside the box--or in their case, looking outside the tumor.

They're hoping that this novel computerized approach represents a historic leap in diagnosing cancer using just routine CAT scans.

If proven successful, it would be a new, non-invasive way to more easily, accurately and inexpensively identify whether certain tumors--especially nodules frequently found on lung CAT scans, for example--are cancerous or harmless.

Currently, lung-cancer screenings involve a radiologist identifying suspicious-looking nodules on a CAT scan. Patients are then subjected to invasive and expensive surgical biopsies or other procedures to analyze the nodules.

So far, however, Case Western Reserve researchers have used a computer to analyze the regions outside the tumor and the blood vessels nearby to successfully predict whether those nodules are cancerous--not through deeper examination or by cutting into them.

The latest research was highlighted in a pair of recent publications in which Madabhushi, the F. Alex Nason Professor II of Biomedical Engineering at the Case School of Engineering, was the senior author.

Niha Beig, a PhD candidate in biomedical engineering, was the lead author on research published Dec. 18 in Radiology which demonstrated that a combination of computer-extracted patterns of heterogeneity within and outside the tumor could distinguish benign from malignant nodules on CAT scans with 80 percent accuracy--compared to 60 percent accuracy by a radiologist.

Earlier this year, Mehdi Alilou, a senior research associate in biomedical engineering, was the lead author on a study showing that computer-extracted patterns of "vessel tortuosity"--or twisted blood vessels--in lung nodules could distinguish between malignant and lung nodules with 85 percent accuracy.

"The number-one reason I'm excited about these papers is that we are in truly uncharted territory," Madabhushi said. "We've all been trained that 'the money is in the tumor,' but what these papers demonstrate unequivocally is that there is a lot of signal outside the tumor, too."

Looking outside the tumor

"We're now doing something that radiologists do not typically tend to do," said Madabhushi. "Radiologists have been looking at CAT scans for 40 or 50 years, but they have never looked in these locations or found what we've found."

Madabhushi and his team, which published a paper today on one aspect of the research, are using "deep-learning" diagnostic computers to examine the shape of blood vessels feeding a nodule found on a lung CAT scan and in regions surrounding the tumor. They're finding previously unrecorded changes in those blood vessels--or otherwise healthy surrounding tissue--which accurately predict a cancer growth nearby, in this case, lung cancer.

That simple and inexpensive diagnosis from an existing CAT scan could then determine whether a patient needs more invasive and expensive procedures, Madabhushi said.

"A lot of these nodules show up on a scan as 'indeterminate,' but 98 percent turn out to be benign, but only after more tests are done," he said. "So there's the economics of it, but also the anxiety for the patient.

"We don't really do a great job of lung-cancer screening because we don't have better tools. This would be a far, far better tool."

This article has been republished from materials provided by Case Western Reserve University. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.

A research team has found that whether you store your fat around the trunk or in other parts of your body is highly influenced by genetic factors and that this effect is present predominantly in women and to a much lower extent in men.

Organizations looking to benefit from the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution should be cautious about putting all their eggs in one basket, a study published in Nature Machine Intelligence has found. Researchers found that contrary to conventional wisdom, there can be no exact method for deciding whether a given problem may be successfully solved by machine learning tools.