Murder for Hire In Santa Cruz – The Curious Career of Irwin Joseph

Many in Santa Cruz, California refer to
Commissioner, Irwin H. Joseph as, “Junk Justice Joseph.” On a
local forum his many errors, omissions and habits are discussed, the
details striking the reader as simple sloppiness.

Those who complain about the rulings
coming from Joseph also note that he seems completely ignorant of the
Constitution, ignoring the rights secured to individuals through the
documents that, presumably, every American should understand. In a
recent case involving the rights of the homeless in Santa Cruz Joseph
ignored the law suit brought by local civil rights attorneys Paul
Sanford and Kate Wells announcing that he had, “made
up his mind,” regarding the rights of homeless to free
expression, ignoring the previous opinion of the appeal court.

That issue was thrown into high
visibility in Santa Cruz when one homeless man, Robert Wagner, died
sitting up in his wheelchair, unable to lay down and so save his own
life. While the onlooker is tempted to lay all of the blame on Irwin
Joseph that is a condemnation that should be more carefully
apportioned.

Irwin Joseph is only a Commissioner.
The role of commissioner has been described by one judge slightly
south of Santa Cruz as, “a rent a cop; sort of like comparing real
police to the guy who walks around the parking lot.” Additionally,
Irwin Joseph, formerly a real estate attorney, has no oath on file at
the Courthouse, unlike those elected to judgeships. This was
ascertained just today. All other such officials had their oaths on
file. Without that oath, signed and dated, the person on the bench
is outside the law. Regrettably, there is no reason to believe that
will bother those who control the courts in Santa Cruz either.

Why do real judges, the local council
and others, presumably better informed, tolerate the presence of
Joseph on the bench acting in all ways as one of them? That is one
question that needs answering. But one answer immediately suggests
itself.

Greed explains many things.

In Santa Cruz, where Robert Wagner died
on the street, another man is locked in a struggle involving Irwin
Joseph. The second man may well be murdered through the active
participation of Joseph.

Joseph managed to acquire the position
of Commissioner in Santa Cruz not through his demonstrated excellence
but through his willingness to do as he is told. His lovely home and
comfortable life style mean everything to him. He let Wagner die,
one kind of murder for hire. Now his comforts and status are
threatened if another man is able to invoke the protections of the
Constitution and stay alive.

Clive Boustred headed a company that
challenged the grip held by the Federal Reserve Bank on money.
InfoTelesys, the company he founded, threatened the perpetual profit
machine that has for over a century pumped unearned trillions into
the bank accounts of a small group of people, fewer than 100,000
individuals. It surprised Boustred to learn after their satellite
based system was launched, that the FED is a private corporation that
issues money that mortgages the lives of Americans through fractional
reserve banking. Then it began to sink in. He learned the facts
after the first murder attempt, carried out by Santa Cruz's Sheriff
Department in 2002. Unarmed and in the act of driving up to his home
with his children in the car, Boustred was targeted by a
sharpshooter. The shooter missed; taking aim from 7 feet away the
deputy sheriff put the bullet through the car, missing Boustred and
his small son who was seated beside him. In the daylight of a sunny
afternoon the situation did not go unnoticed. The deputy sheriff,
preparing for a second shot, stopped only when his supervisor
intervened having noticed neighbors watching.

Today, InfoTelesys is on hold. Over
the last years Boustred has warded off two more assassination
attempts and now faces another that may well take place as planned
this Friday. In each instance the attack came through the legal
system, using the personnel paid for by tax payers but arrayed
against him by the local judicial system through the collusion of
Joseph, among others.

This Friday Boustred faces eviction
from his home, an event timed to coincide with a long awaited court
date aimed at taking Commissioner Irwin Joseph off his case. The
eviction is unwarranted and illegal, taking place through edicts
issued by Joseph and unsupported by law. Billions of dollars are at
stake.

Boustred has not been idle. Law suits
that awarded Boustred, by default, funds of 60 billion dollars in
restitution from Santa Cruz, The State of California, and the United
States government wait to be paid. Joseph and his cronies know that
new legal action by Boustred is in the works.

Irwin Joseph and others found the
perfect weapon in Boustred's former wife. Anamaria stands to profit
from a life insurance policy worth a million dollars if Clive
Boustred dies next Friday in a rain of bullets. If he lives and
manages to force compliance with the original settlement agreement
she will owe him hundreds of thousands of dollars. Anamaria, who
later married the man, her lover, who helped her empty the family's
bank accounts has motive. To save herself Anamaria wants Boustred
dead.

Those who are taking aim at Boustred in
Santa Cruz are, themselves, felons, traitors to the Constitution.

The question that is beginning to
confront Americans, right, left, and never thought about it, is the
agenda behind the actions undertaken by those who, to serve in public
office, are obligated to uphold the Constitution and our rights.
Across America today the Constitution along with Boustred, is under
attack.

In the measures passed by Congress as
H.B. 1955 and S.B. 1959, The
Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
was written, passed, and signed into law for a purpose. Since the
weight of evidence from a broad range of sources now give the lie to
the idea that there has been any terrorism not initiated by those in
power, Americans would be well advised to consider the reasons behind
this measure along with the militarization of police across the
country.

We have been moved from government in
the hands of the people to government for the profit of those who
hold power. The Constitution interferes with that agenda.

Today in America as few as 10% of those
holding public office fulfill the Constitutional and legal obligation
to sign the written oath promising they will uphold the foundations
of American law. Around the same percentage post the bond also
required. Instead, you, the taxpayer pay the costs when they are
found culpable.

The failure to sign the oath, which is
then kept on file with the Secretary of State and the County
Recorder, is a misdemeanor until the fact is called to attention.
When the individual is noticed the offense becomes a felony.
Officials guilty of the crime of failing to sign the oath may never
again legally serve in a position of public trust. They are to be
ejected from office, according to law. They are also liable for
damages, including the cost of relitigating and the costs of
decisions made while they were illegally occupying the office.

As much as 90% of those presently
occupying offices of public trust are therefore criminals aside from
the corruption that is also endemic.

Why would so many fail to carry out a
requirement that is so simple? The answer is easy. Displacing the
Constitution makes them arrogant and so their arrogance makes them
sloppy, as sloppy as Irwin Joseph is himself

The Constitution, easily understood,
short, and focused on the rights of individuals, is not open to
manipulation. The Constitution mandates accountability; the concept
of sovereign immunity for those in power is alien to its precepts and
absent from its text.

From cases involving the rights of the
homeless to agencies that take children out of homes to be cycled
into a system that first generates income from their presence in that
system and then sells children into adoptions, the porn industry and
as sexual slaves, every point that could be converted to unearned
income has been covered. Through a family law system, through the
whole regulatory grid the potential for moving money from the hands
of those who earned it to those who hungered for the means to steal
without having to lift a gun in honest theft, every base has been
covered.

When there is that much money at stake
it was a natural extension to use the same system, tuned for taking,
into the means to keep the money rolling in.

To be a Constitutionalist, to affirm
the foundation of American thought and government is being converted
from the ultimate patriotism to a form of terrorism according to
those in Congress and the president now in office. By those standards
every single one of our Founders was a Home Grown Terrorist. When
you understand the agenda of those in power, to strip Americans of
their fortunes, their lives, and their freedom, it is painfully clear
why they view the Constitution with such ceaseless hostility.

Despite what those in control say the
Constitution remains the tool that keeps America free. But to do
that it must be used. Those in positions of public trust must
understand their obligation and be bound to keep their oaths. How to
change the present trajectory and return America to government by the
people, using the Constitution, Common Law and Common Law courts, is
the challenge we now face. The statute that made signing the Oath
mandatory was the first measure passed by Congress after the
Constitution was ratified. It was one of the bricks in the
foundation of law they built for a free people.

Many are now taking up the work that
must be done. Ensuring that those allowed to remain in positions of
public trust affirm and uphold the Constitution must become an
immediate concern, calling Americans to action.

Don Rogers, former California State
Senator, known to his many supporters as, “Mr. Real Conservative,”
commented that there needs to be a reawakening, that, “Most of
those in office today hate and fear the Constitution.” Former
Senator Rogers has founded a Committee to Restore the Constitution.
The group is urging that no candidate for office receive support
without having passed a test on the Constitution and Common Law,
demonstrating that they understand how it works in the hands of the
people. Without that certification no voter, Rogers said, should
vote for any candidate.

Knowing the Constitution is an
essential for anyone employed by the public. For a commissioner or
judge it is more. It is the law. California Code Of Civil Procedure
CCP Section 170.6, (a) are explicit. They state, “Any
party to or any attorney appearing in any action or proceeding may
establish this prejudice by an oral or written motion without notice
supported by affidavit or declaration under penalty of perjury or an
oral statement under oath that the judge, court commissioner, or
referee before whom the action or proceeding is pending or to whom it
is assigned is prejudiced against any party or

attorney or the interest of the party or attorney so that the party or attorney cannot or believes that he or she cannot have a fair and impartial trial or hearing before the judge, court commissioner, or referee.”

On the same day that Irwin Joseph is
scheduled to 'hear' the issue of an illegal eviction against Boustred
Joseph faces a judgment in the case Boustred won by default, cited
above, for billions of dollars. If there was ever a conflict of
interest that defines it. Boustred has tried to recuse Irwin Joseph
every single time he has heard this ongoing case; every time Joseph
and his 'associates' in Santa Cruz ignore the law. No commissioner,
even if he has signed the oath, can, by law hear a case when one of
the parties objects.

And today Jackie, the assistant in
Judge Ronald White's office in the U. S. District Court called to
tell Boustred, “as a courtesy,” that Irwin Joseph had not been
properly noticed when the noticing had taken place in court by a
third party. White, according to Jackie, wants to decide the outcome
of the hearing on Friday in advance of a hearing taking place. One
might expect that their next move will be to decide to simply
transfer the title of Boustred's 19 acre estate into their own names
after they shoot him to death and Anamaria collects the million
dollars.

There are many reasons that the powers
that be in Santa Cruz, and elsewhere, want Clive Boustred dead. He
threatened their con game; he will not shut up. Having lived a life
free of graft and corruption they have nothing they can use to
blackmail him into silence. Remember this and arm yourself with the
Constitution. It works when enough of us understand and come
together.