Rich And Poor Kids Eat
Same Diet, Poor Get Fatter
By Brad Evenson
The National Post
Part Six Of A Six-Part Series
10-6-3

Children from poorer families tended to be most overweight,
researchers say. But don't blame the parents because how they brought them
up seemed to make no difference at all.

Liz Goodman is part of a growing group of researchers
who believe growing up poor, or feeling poor, makes you fat.

"Over the past 20 years, economic and social inequalitites
have been rising," says Dr. Goodman, an obesity researcher at Brandeis
University in Waltham, Mass.

"And it's interesting that there's this burgeoning
epidemic of obesity at the same time."

As another scientist puts it, "Poverty really does
get under your skin."

In Canada, kids from poor families are twice as likely
to be obese as rich kids. A study published in August in the International
Journal of Obesity found 6.4% of children in the wealthiest quarter of
the Canadian population were obese, compared with 12.8% of those in the
poorest quarter. The heaviest children live in single-parent homes, with
46% either overweight or obese.

It's easy to blame obesity on poor diet and lack of exercise.
But this is overly simplistic, like blaming high unemployment on the number
of people watching afternoon television. It doesn't explain underlying
causes.

Experts say the deeper roots of the obesity problem lie
at the crossroads between social status and biology. Generally speaking,
even if rich kids and poor kids eat exactly the same diet -- from Big Macs
and fries to tofu and granola -- the poor kids get fatter.

"I believe that there's much more biology to this
than what we've been willing to recognize in the past," says Dr. Goodman.

The centre of this poverty-obesity link is a hormonal
pathway known as the HPA axis. This is a loop connecting the hypothalamus,
a jellybean-size part of the brain that governs appetite, and the pituitary
and adrenal glands, which secrete a variety of hormones, including the
stress hormone cortisol.

Cortisol helps the liver convert fat into the lightning
bursts of energy the body needs to escape danger, a vital function. But
it also signals the body to accumulate mounds of fat in the abdomen, building
the "apple" shape that is so hazardous to health.

"When you have too much cortisol, you have Cushing's
disease, which is an illness that causes central fat deposition,"
says Dr. Goodman.

Once this fat builds up, it spews a toxic array of chemical
signals back to the brain and into the body. "It's a vicious cycle,"
she says.

Research shows children raised in low socioeconomic settings
produce greater amounts of cortisol, a stress hormone.

In a 2001 study, researchers from McGill University measured
the hormone levels of 300 children from poor to wealthy families. They
found three times as much cortisol in low-income kids compared with rich
kids.

"The differences are especially big in elementary
school," says lead researcher Sonia Lupien.

Not only does increased cortisol lead directly to a fat
waistline, Dr. Lupien points out it can also trigger depression, which
opens a surprising new chapter in obesity research.

The conventional thinking goes that kids who are fat
get depressed about their plight. But in a 2002 study of 10,000 U.S. teens,
published in the journal Pediatrics, Dr. Goodman and her colleagues discovered
just the opposite.

"We looked at people who were overweight or obese
at the beginning and whether or not that increased depressive symptoms
over time. And it didn't," she says.

"But if you were depressed [but not overweight]
at the beginning, you were more likely to become overweight. In fact, there
was about a twofold increase in risk of becoming obese."

In other words, skinny depressed kids get fat, and fat
depressed kids get even fatter, which explains why some doctors have successfully
treated some obesity patients with the anti-depressant Prozac.

Poverty can lead to obesity in other ways than stress.
Many low-income parents cannot afford to enroll their children in organized
sports. They may also choose less healthy foods at the supermarket and
use TV or video games as babysitters, says Mark Tremblay, senior scientific
advisor for health measurement at Statistics Canada.

This is unfortunate, because kids with elevated cortisol
need the most physical activity to lower it.

"The child from the poorer background with the altered
hormone profile would benefit to a greater extent from exercise, because
that's what exercise does," says Dr. Tremblay. "It helps get
cortisol and other hormones under control. It blunts future stress responses
to that. So the lower [socioeconomic status] child would have more to gain."

Dr. Tremblay does not believe poverty leads inevitably
to a high body mass index -- it's not destiny, he says. Lack of exercise,
too much TV and video games are more potent factors. But he agrees biology
plays a big role in the obesity of the underclass.

"Clearly, it's at the cellular level that the calories
are used up and the energy liberated," he says. "So the biology
has a huge impact."

While many people blame mothers and fathers for the obesity
of their children, research shows parenting styles -- strict, abusive,
lax or indifferent -- make little difference. A Duke University study published
this year in the journal Pediatrics tracked nearly 1,000 white North Carolina
children aged nine to 16 for a period of eight years. Young boys -- but
not girls -- seemed especially vulnerable to dual cases of depression with
obesity. And researchers found kids from poorer families tended to be most
overweight. But how their parents brought them up, strict or lenient, seemed
to make no difference.

"My biggest surprise was that ... almost none of
the [parenting styles] were significant in predicting obesity," says
lead researcher Susan Mustillo, of Duke University Medical Center.

Anyone doubting the links between stress, poverty and
fat need only look at Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

After the reunification of Germany in 1990, the body
mass indexes of East German children and young adults rose sharply compared
with those in West Germany. German public health officials say class inequalities
rose after reunification, leading to poverty and unemployment, which had
powerful health effects.

An even more stark example of the connections between
chronic stress, social dislocation, abnormalities of the HPA axis and cortisol
secretion comes from a 1998 study done in Sweden and Lithuania. Researchers
from Link°ping University compared 150 randomly sampled men, aged 50,
from the cities of Vilnius and Link°ping, to assess their risks of
heart disease. At the time, Lithuania was struggling to adjust to a Western
style economy.

"They reported more job strain, more social isolation,
less effective coping strategies, lower self-esteem, more depression and
vital exhaustion."

Perhaps the most remarkable finding was the stress response.
When the researchers subjected the Swedish men to a stress test, the subjects'
cortisol levels jumped sharply. But the levels in the Lithuanians barely
budged -- they were already high. While levels soon dropped to normal in
the Swedes, they ebbed much more slowly in the Vilnius men.

"This attenuated stress response has earlier been
shown in states of chronic stress," reported Dr. Kristenson.

Health researchers say Canada is starting to look more
like Lithuania than Sweden these days. They blame the shift to conservative
governments.

"In Ontario, the risk of diabetes is four times
higher in low-income women than high income," says Dennis Raphael,
an associate professor in the School of Health Policy and Management at
York University in Toronto.

Diabetes mellitus, a common complication of obesity,
is twice as common among middle-aged Canadians with household incomes less
than $30,000 than those living in households with incomes of $60,000 or
higher. And rates have increased sharply since the mid-1980s. By 2010,
an estimated four million Canadians will have diabetes.

Dr. Raphael says the shift to more conservative governments
around the world is a big factor.

"If you're serious about population health, and
if you're serious about heart disease and diabetes, then you don't want
to create the kind of policy environments we've been creating in Ontario
and in Canada," he says.

"You don't want to increase housing insecurity,
you don't want to increase income insecurity, you don't want to increase
food insecurity, and you don't want to go out of your way to make life
difficult for people."

Source: The National Post. Part six of a six-part series.
For more information please contact <mailto:bevenson@nationalpost.com>bevenson@nationalpost.com

http://procor.healthnet.org/archive/200309/msg00004.php

Comment
From Liz
10-6-3

Hi Jeff -

This is interesting...seems as though poverty effects
more than heart disease.

There is some research suggesting that even when richer
kids have the fat genes, they do not get as fat as the more impoverished
children. So, I'm guessing it's a little of both, genes and environment.
I'm not suggesting it's the parents, what I am saying, is that it's the
child's perception of being poor that causes the psychological reaction,
which in turn causes a physical reaction.

If you have ever talked to people with a weight problem,
you will discover, that many of them have tried changing their diets and
exercised themselves to death and they are still overweight.

Hmmm... My opinion on the whole matter is this, the human
body reacts to mental states and environmental toxins in many different
ways. Some folks get cancer, others heart disease, some get gout or arthritis
and some people gain weight. With a growing body of evidence that suggests
that it's not ALL in the diet, I think many people are going to have to
change theri attitudes about overweight people. There is just to much evidence
available fro a variety of sources. Too many results from studies carried
out in the last 20 years to claim, it's all in the overeating!

Love:) Liz

Comment

From Dian Nicholson

comehome@sympatico.ca

10-6-3

Dear Jeff,

I'm a metaphysician... that is to say I am a person who
assists people who suffer symptoms to identify the emotional issues behind
physical symptoms.

The science mentioned in this article is lagging way
behind those of us, like Louise Hay (You Can Heal Your Body - Hay House),
who have long seen the connection... the very SPECIFIC connection... between
the mindset and the body's health.

The issue of obesity has never been about diet. It has
ALWAYS been an issue of self-protection, fear, and self-rejection. Specifically,
"oversensitivity; often represents fear and shows a need for protection.
Fear may be a cover for hidden anger and a resistance to forgive."
Where the fat accumulates will tell me instantly exactly what fear the
person is dealing with. How much and how long it has been there will tell
me roughly when the problem started... as well as how little has been done
about it.

Fat arms: Anger at being denied love

Fat belly: Anger at being denied nourishment

Fat hips: Lumps of stubborn anger at the parents

Fat Thighs: Packed childhood anger. Often rage at the
father. ( And how many women complain of 'saddlebags'? )

You get the drift.

The research that is now showing the mind-body connection
for what it truly is.... REAL.... is only now addressing the obvious facts
that come out anytime statistics on any group with the same condition are
gathered. For example, it is no surprise that married men live longer
than single ones... married men are (although fewer and fewer couples know
how to have good relationships) more likely to be nurtured, cared for,
appreciated and loved.

Here's one example of the Louise Hay list of connections
between mind and body:

Menopausal problems: "Fear of no longer being wanted;
Fear of aging; Self-rejection; Not feeling good enough." Indications:
The organs involved are located in the area of the second chakra, or energy
vortex on the subatomic level of the body. The second chakra is totally
involved with matters of putting into action those dreams, ambitions and
desires we have. When the mind stops creating new things, the body just
follows along on that line of thought....and this works because at the
subatomic level, all energy is thought-responsive, and proven to be so!

And another:

Cancer: "Deep hurt; Longstanding resentment; deep
secret or grief eating away at the self. Carrying hatreds." And
the attitude, directly connected with that specific pain, of "what's
the use, it'll never change"..

In dealing with patients who have healed and stayed clear,
we find that they changed their minds along with the 'treatment' they received.
In those who do not heal, we find that their mind is in lockstep with
the original wound or grief.

Just as in the article you posted, where women felt supported,
needed and loved, they recovered from their breast cancers much more fully
and quickly than those who did not, who worsened and in many cases, died.

Louise Hay and Caroline Myss are two leaders in the field,
which has been nicknamed

"Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI)" by researchers.
What I have found in my practice of nearly 15 years is that in no case
has their lists of conditions and their connected attitudes ever let me
down in exposing a causative factor.

Exposing the issue is NOT the whole solution, however.
One cannot affirm anything one does not completely believe, inside and
out. Therefore one must examine the generation point of the emotions involved,
and truly resolve those issues... and that is where my work hits the ground
running.

I am most grateful to you for showing this cutting-edge
information about what healing really consists of, because it leads folks
like me, who do not have enough of a forum to teach what should be taught,
to comment and share the truth about our health with those who wish to
have it.