The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Abstract

The use of complex statistical models to adjust for confounding is common in medical research.

Objective:

To determine the frequency and adequacy of adjustment for confounding in medical articles.

Design:

Cross-sectional survey.

Setting:

34 scientific medical journals with a high impact factor.

Measurements:

Frequency of reporting on methods used to adjust for confounding in 537 original research articles published in January 1998.

Results:

Of the 537 articles, 169 specified that adjustment for confounding was used. In 1 paper in 10, it was unclear which statistical method was used or for which variables adjustment was made. In 45% of papers, it was not clear how multicategory or continuous variables were treated in the analysis. Inadequate reporting was less frequent if an author was affiliated with a department of statistics, epidemiology, or public health and if articles were published in journals with a high impact factor.

Conclusions:

Details of methods used to adjust for confounding are frequently not reported in original research articles.