Facts speak louder than statistics

Monday, 17 November 2014

The warmist version of climate change eventually found its
way onto the agenda of G20 and it need to be asked why. The whole carbon based deal
the warmists are selling is nothing more than a scam, why give it the slightest
hint of legitimacy? What will they do next year, discuss giving money to people
who have sent Advance Fee scam emails? Actually give them money and pretend it’s
for legitimate reasons? After all they’re advocating giving money over to
warmists, if they give money to them for their make believe reasons where will
they draw the line?

The whole carbon line pushed with this scam
with its taxes, pricing and subsidies does not help the environment in the
slightest, it never has and never will. Australia’s own venture into carbon taxing
proved that. What the carbon deal really achieves is that it makes a select
group of warmists rich, sucks money out of economies for expensive ‘studies’ and such like and gives the rest of the warmists a feel-good moment while they pretend they
are doing something real.

They cry the science is settled and you can’t question it amongst
other things but given how many times their story has changed to match what’s
really happening there’s nothing settled in what they are pushing. Science is
never settled and can always be questioned by anyone and no real scientist
would have any problems with questions. Scammers on the other hand don’t want what
they are presenting questioned, usually it’s because it can’t stand up to any
real scrutiny.

Do we have to care for the environment? Of course we do but
all the claims of the carbon scam being for the environment has potentially
tarred real environmental issues with the same brush, it certainly has pushed
them out of the public eye while everyone is distracted by all the climate
nonsense being presented.

And are the people who don’t buy into the carbon line ‘climate
change deniers’? Nope, they are climate change realists. Everyone I speak to
has acknowledged the climate changes and that it has constantly been changing
throughout history. There have been ice ages, warmer periods and ice ages again and
no amount of taxes or pricing etc. back then would have stopped any of it any more
than it would stop it now.

Friday, 14 November 2014

Climate change has reportedly been added to the agenda at
G20, it would seem they added it to avoid upsetting the people who believe
climate change is driven by carbon dioxide emissions. Doing this to avoid
upsetting someone is like avoiding having to tell an adult there is no Santa
Claus or answering an Advance Fee scam email in order to avoid upsetting the con artist who sent the email to you.

Speaking of email scams, the way some warmists
present their climate change nonsense is similar to how the email scammers present
their scam. First of all the whole thing is obviously a fiction but of course that fact
is ignored as the scam is put forward.

They use key comments in an attempt
to give their story credibility. Email scammers will say things like ‘100% safe’ and ‘no risk
to you’, the warmists say things like ‘peer reviewed’ and ‘the science is
settled’. Both groups use capital letters to emphasis certain points and both present a prize
at the end of it all. The email scammers say you will receive lots of money and
the warmists say you’ll have a peaceful pollution free world.

Just as you take the bait both groups hit you with the
catch, you have to give some money first and lots of it to get the prize and the
only real difference between the two groups’ surfaces here. You can tell the
email scammers to get stuffed and keep your money but if the warmists have
their people in government then you can kiss your cash and the nation’s economic
wellbeing goodbye.

The final results for both scams are the same, despite all
the money that gets paid out there is nothing to show for it. The email
scammers never had millions to give you and the warmists can’t give you a
better environment. You’re simply out of pocket and others are richer at your
expense.

Saturday, 27 September 2014

The recent Scottish independence referendum has brought out
a group of people from outside of Scotland and the UK who thought they were
somehow entitled to dictate to Scotland how they should vote. These outsiders
then believed they are entitled to throw insults (from the safety of being many
miles away) at the Scottish people when the result did not go the way some of those
outside the UK wanted it to go.

When called out on their insulting behaviour they claimed to
be exercising their right to free speech while trying inhibit that same right
in the people calling them out.

Fact is their insults are not free speech, they are lame
comments from people sulking that things go how they wanted.

Did people outside of Scotland have the right to say whether
they believe Scotland should have voted yes or no? They did and that’s free
speech. Did they have the right to say they felt the choice made by Scotland
was right or wrong? They did, that’s free speech.Did they have the right to insult the people
of Scotland? No, insults are not in the category of free speech.

No one outside of Scotland has the right to try and dictate
to the Scottish what they should do. Whatever reason Scottish people had for
voting to remain in the United Kingdom is not up for the approval of others.
Whether they voted to remain out of loyalty, history or whatever reason is
solely their choice, after all they are the ones who actually live there and
will be continuing to live there, not the people throwing the insults (from the
safety of being many miles away).

Regarding the vote though it is a shame that final vote
wasn’t more decisive but at least the people of Scotland were given an opportunity
to vote on the independence issue. As far as the people who are insulting
Scotland are concerned, they’re showing their true colours. People genuinely
concerned with Scotland and its future would be wishing Scotland the best for
the future and possibly offering their opinions on the impending restructure of
the UK.

And with little concern for the little hissy fits from the
people who throw insults (from the safety of being many miles away) Scotland
the Brave will continue as a free nation within the United Kingdom, Scottish
soldiers will continue to stand alongside all of their comrades in the UK,
Scottish culture will still be a part of the UK and the Scottish people in
general will continue helping to keep the United Kingdom united and the great
country that it is.

About This Page

Welcome to World Central, an independent page presenting straightforward news, views and attitudes. Looking for what's right as opposed to just looking right and presenting the facts, not the fantasy and certainly not the ideology. This page is not designed to offend, the intent is to find the facts and present them to the world.The opinions expressed here are the editor’s and do not represent any other persons, company, organisation etc. The opinions posted in the comments section are the opinion of the person posting them.