Share this Article

Author:

Tags:

Carry Prejean, the Miss America beauty pageant contestant who defied Perez Hilton\’s question of \’Is it ok to have gay marriage?\’ by stating her Christian beliefs, is now once again being attacked by the left wing media.

As if it wasn\’t bad enough that she was persecuted for being a Christian, all at the hands of bigoted liberals, they have now gone through the trouble and dragged up on old photo of her from a model shoot, when she was 17. In the image, the side flesh of her bosom is exposed and liberal media says because of this, Carrie Prejean is obviously an immoral person.

I think such accusations are petty, sick and unwarranted. It is not fair to demonize a Christian woman in this way, just because she chooses a life of faith and morality. The hypocrisy of the liberals is quite rich.

Claire, what are you talking about? And the problem with Michelle’s current dresses is that first ladies should dress a certain way. They not only represent America to the world, but should be the pinnacle role model for any young woman.

Wretched, there is no way Bruce would have taken Chuck Norris. Chuck is a trained fighter first, with EARNED titles, and only an actor as a side job.

Why do you keep trying to change the subject, Claire? I’m talking about one young woman here who is being attacked unfairly by the left wing media.

The sin of homosexuality has been a point of contention since ancient times and is a big item today, namely due to the issue of gay marriage. Those matters need to be discussed.

What isn’t needed is ridiculing this innocent young woman for espousing her beliefs. Why are they still putting her to the pyre! I don’t see countless articles demonizing Perez Hilton for asking her the question and saying it’s ok to be gay!

If you can find proof to the contrary, please post it. No, better yet, submit it as an article (click the Submit A Link) and hopefully the media staff here will allow it to publish if you can find contrary.

I’m 100% confident hat you will not find Christian sites demonizing Perez Hilton over this issue TODAY yet weeks after all is said and done, the Christian victim is being dragged through the mud. Horrible.

I would not have a problem with a gay site saying “Boo, the Christians do not like gay marriage.” That is fine. Many groups of people do not like gay marriage and if someone has a problem with that, fine, talk about it. That’s my point.

That’s the discussion that’s been going on for centuries.

What is NOT FINE is trying to demonize why young woman for being an advocate for same sex marriage. They are trying to ruin her reputation just because she has Christian values and believes in a nuclear family.

That’s bigotry against one person. It would be the same as if each and every day, Christians were stalking Perez Hilton and trying to find every single picture of him that showed him in a negative light, then harping on it for weeks on end just because he is gay and did what he did during the Miss America competition.

As you admitted, this is not being done. Yet, the liberal media is attacking one woman for not agreeing with same sex marriage on national tv. That’s sick and twisted.

“all at the hands of bigoted liberals””I think such accusations are petty, sick and unwarranted. It is not fair to demonize a Christian woman in this way, just because she chooses a life of faith and morality. The hypocrisy of the liberals is quite rich.” Irony WIN!

I don’t see any place where Mrs. Obama was called a ‘dirty whore’. I do say that the dress was immoral and inviting premarital relations, which is not the thing a young woman should be doing on a prom night.

Sure, it doesn’t directly say “dirty whore” but that’s what the author of the article was implying. All I’m saying is that Tyson Boners III did the exact same thing that you’re accusing liberals of doing—digging up some harmless picture from someone’s past in order to hurt them.

For all I know flussy is not even a word, so I have no idea what Tyson was talking about. What I do know is this was a big conversation piece in my office today. Why on Earth is Carrie Prejean still being demonized for simply saying that as a Christian, she thinks marriage should be between a man and woman.

She even preambled it by saying it’s great that America gives the right to choose, despite her beliefs to the contrary. She is still being hounded and ridiculed, and it’s pretty ugly in my opinion.

I’m not changing the subject at all. I’m simply pointing out that you are being very hypocritical for accusing liberals of trying to demonize this woman when you’ve done nothing on this site except demonize homosexuals.

You said:

“I’m talking about one young woman here who is being attacked unfairly by the left wing media.”

And I’m talking about millions of homosexuals who are being attacked unfairly by the right wing, Christian media.

“The sin of homosexuality has been a point of contention since ancient times”

So what? Just because people in the “ancient times” demonized homosexuals doesn’t mean that today, in the 21st Century, we should continue to demonize them. That’s like saying that because they had slavery in “ancient times”, slavery is therefore OK, and we should continue to have slavery.

“What isn’t needed is ridiculing this innocent young woman for espousing her beliefs.”

Just like what isn’t needed is ridiculing millions of innocent homosexuals for being in love with someone of the same gender.

“I’m 100% confident hat you will not find Christian sites demonizing Perez Hilton over this issue TODAY yet weeks after all is said and done, the Christian victim is being dragged through the mud. Horrible.”

No, but what you will find are Christian sites, such as this one, posting article after article of how “evil” homosexuals are. Homosexuals have endured much, much worse ridicule than this woman, from people like you, Adam, who write such hateful things as “they’ll burn in the lake of fire”.

Next time, perhaps you should take a look at yourself and consider the hateful things you have said, before posting about liberals saying hateful things towards someone.

Now we have such thing as Christian Bashing, as opposed to Gay Bashing, except in Gay Bashing people die. In Christian Bashing people bring up old embarrassments and poke an angry stick built up from a long history of Gay Bashing. Good your side finally has a notable victim, be proud. But it still doesn’t compare to the hundreds of thousands of homosexuals who have been spit on, beat on, murdered in cold blood, shunned by family, ruined by others, or demonized in the name of false Christianity. Remember, Jesus was accepting of people, and he instructed his followers to practice the same. He didn’t say turn them into pillars of salt, or imprison them, or enslave them, or to throw the first stone at them. He said to accept them and to love them. Christianity is a beautiful thing. You people make it look ugly.

Style familiarity can be an advantage, sticking to one style can fuck you up now a days. That’s why I’m training in Muay Thai and Apache Knife Fighting. Even though I’ll only have two styles, I can throw off my opponent by switching it up. Here’s a list of Bruce Lee’s styles.
1. Wu Shu
2. Kung Fu (Jun Fan Gung Fu and Wing Chun)
3. Boxing
4. Jujitsu
5. Jeet Kune Do
It was Bruce Lee who influnced one of Street Fighter’s characters Fei Long.