Provost Marshalls to Serve Notice To Governors of All 50 States? Restore America

The woman in this video IS from a previous hoax or false event. I'm still trying to find the original thread and video, however, it was similar to
this thread in terms of style and period of time. www.abovetopsecret.com...

I'm doing a search for certain keywords like "military" "soldier" "warning" "attack" and I want to say that it was within 10-8 months ago.
still digging.

Hold off on any overly emotional responses guys. This has hoax, scam, disinfo written all over it.

But you still need to understand that "big" government is a reflection or the consequence of people's greed, intolerence and aphaty.
What you're proposing, however right it is, will seem like new-age nwo illusion to some of the so called freedom fighters. Don't ever count them
out.

usual alarmist crap by the so called "Christian" RIGHT militia.
They scream for FREEDOM, but only if it is delivered by the GOP, and if its not, then the usual threats of revolution are uttered.

It's funny but I made a similar point above but was told that support for this wasn't a Republican or a Democrat issue. However, how often do you
hear of a Christian 'LEFT' militia in America? How often do you really get the 'left' talking about armed insurrection or either backing the
military or actually mimicking the military?

Wow. I watched all the videos and read the first five pages and needed to comment. I don't know if anybody has brought this up in later pages
but... I have a feeling that this could be a message being put out there by the TPTB. The idea would be to trick groups into reacting and gearing up.

It’s a lot like when the USA flew that passenger jet over Russian territory to light up their nukes sites so we knew where they were. This would be
the perfect trick to stir up and identify any people who are highly disgruntled with the state of things. If people actually acted on this
information TPTB would point to it as a reason to further limit civil liberties.

I’m going to be keeping my eye on this much more so than any former pronouncement (like Discloser) on ATS! If this is a hoax then I’m sure I
know who put them up to the hoax. It’s so obvious! If this is real, well then… I we will all know soon enough!

Looks more like a disclaimer to me. Kind of like how you see naturopaths professing the fact they aren't "doctors" so they don't get sued for
giving "medical advice"

edit: also just found this .pdf. At the very end of page 2 (scroll) you see the same "disclaimer". I'm not sure what to make of that, other than to
assume he is not a lawyer and wants to make sure he doesn't get prosecuted for practicing as one. ??

The concept of this is serving notice of return to common law and has been done before, although in the UK. the article for return to common law
exists within the Magna Carta -

And yes this applies to the US, as the constitution was based on commonlaw as follows from the the Magna Carta - precedent of a Texas Man citing the
MC for revocation of his citizenship.

Anyway, the notice basically states that any adherance or enforcement on legistlation on a man or woman cannot be done, only on a person, and that
such departure from the protected rights under commonlaw, if a failure on the part of the head of state to protect the said rights under common law.
This therefore is a demand to return, otherwise the heads and government are deemed to have commited treason.

its the same concept, and has been done. So far I see no change in the stance of the UK govt or the queen. So I can only assume that TPTB have no
interest in upholding commonlaw even if the result is illegal. As at the end of the day, they have the army

This woman was the same one that came out a few months back speaking of RFID chips/transmitters and some grand plan to chip us all. Complete with
truck routes and secret helicopters with"strange marked cargo".

None of which came true.

She has also claimed to have inside knowledge and work in some capacity for law enforcement.

She has a following on YouTube ever since. Her YouTube user name denotes 'end times' rhetoric.

She's a "Christian" who seems very interested in doomsday scenarios, and she claims to get emails from 'insiders', who know the master plan. I
looked at the links on her video and they show nothing to back up what she said.

Why is this woman speaking as if she confirmed or validated anything? Better yet, where is ANY source for the claims she is making?

Umm.. yea in 2 days we will see yet another B.S. crap posting... Hello were on ATS...
There is no sub government over throw...lol
that is just insain I wish they would just so I can be told I was wrong...but lets get real..lol

Mr. Kennedy (sorry, but there is NO proof or evidence he even has a college degree) advocates the OID and BIC process. He claims Judges run away,
Sheriffs resign from office, attorneys are scared to death of the process, yet I can not find one VERIFABLE case where it has worked. I am talking
about the cause number, plaintiff, court, state, etc. Everytime he discusses a case, he refuses to provide this information to "protect" the person
using the process. This does not make sense. If it works why does he need to protect the person using the process??? He/she won. What can the courts
do to them? If the courts "mess" with them again then the BIC process will be used again against the court. What is it I do not understand?

What I am concerned about is that they did not win. . I have heard that several people attempting to use his processes are in jail, which is now
why he says his show is for entertainment purposes only. This really concerns me for why would I want to use a product which the seller of
(Kennedy) can not endorse. If you were facing a civil or criminal lawsuit, would you take the advice of an attorney which he qualifed with "my advice
is for entertainment purposes only'? That what it sounds like coming from Kenney.

(emphasis mine)

So it seems there is a method to his madness.

Having people who attend your seminars sign affidavits so he can confirm your identity... that coming from a person who by all accounts, seems to be
using an alias himself??

I can see bringing the womans credibility into this, but not focusing on it. She merely reported something that has been confirmed to exist by other
valid links. Why continue to bring her into this, do you guys believe that she not only reported this, but also created all the other information
presented to support it? Forget about the lady, lets get to the bottom of the actual information, shall we?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.