On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee voted 19-11 to pass Rep. Bob Goodlattes (R-VA) SAFE Act to abolish the Diversity Visa Lottery. The bill will now go before the full House.

Most Americans do not even know that we have a lottery to give out Visas, but the rest of the world knows. In 2009, more than 15 million applications for the Visa Lottery were filled online. The only requirement is a high school diploma or some equivalency. The immigrants are selected by simply put the applications in a lottery. 50,000 Diversity Immigrant Visas are then granted random chance.

John Conyers (D-MI), the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, decried the SAFE Act because the diversity program has always been an important part of our immigration system," noting that it is the major source for African immigration.

In reality, the lottery is only 25 years old, and was never meant for African immigrants. The Lottery was created in 1986 under the guise of giving visas to Irish illegal aliens who were largely ineligible by the 1986 Amnesty. For years it was known as the Irish Program. However, as Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies explains,

Nonetheless, the lottery  like many other federal programs  has taken on a life of its own. It has evolved over the years, and now offers a maximum of 50,000 visas per year to people from underrepresented countries, i.e., all the nations of the world other than the top dozen or so sources of immigration.1 In practice, this means that most visa lottery winners come from the Islamic world and sub-Saharan Africa.

Ultimately, our immigration policy is simply a question of how many people we let into the country and how to choose them. Personally, I believe that we should choose those who are most likely to contribute to American society and assimilate into our common culture. Some argue that we should base it more on humanitarian concerns or those who have family members here. Regardless of your view, simply awarding residency and eventually citizenship by the luck of the draw is absurd.

There are other serious concerns with the Visa Lottery.

First, it is a major national security risk. Terrorist supporting countries such as Iran, Sudan, Syria are among the countries that receive the most visas. Mohammed Atta, the mastermind behind the 9-11 terrorist attacks applied for the visa lottery at least once, and by luck, he was denied. However, we were not so lucky with other terrorists.

Hesham Mohamed Hedayet who shot up Los Angeles International Airport in 2002, killing two people and wounding four others, would not have been allowed into this country had he not won the visa lottery. Other terrorists such as Detroit sleeper cell member Karim Koubriti were allowed into this country on a Diversity Immigrant Visa.

Additionally, the Visa Lottery encourages illegal immigration. Illegal aliens who have already broken into this country can apply for legal citizenship through the diversity lottery without even returning to their nation of origin.

The Diversity Visas Lottery is also ripe for fraud. The Wall Street Journal reported that one man entered the drawing 2,800 times last year. He was caught and denied consideration, but amazingly, he is still allowed to reapply the next year.

Finally, every single immigrant who comes to this country on Diversity Immigrant Visa is given a permanent work authorization. While these visas are less than 5% of the total number of green cards issued each year, that is still 50,000 jobs that could be going to American citizens.

Its long past time that America ends the lottery. I applaud the House Judiciary Committee for taking this important first step and urge the rest of the House and the Senate to follow their lead.

It is no problem in most of these countries to come up with fraudulent, but real documents to support a visa application.
Birth certificates and school diploma’s from the original source, but fraudulent.

The ultimate stupidity of these diversity lotteries is that there is no diversity. I had friends in Japan who had money, skills and pro-American views. They entered this lottery year after year and never won.

There is no attempt to draw winners from areas of the world which are under represented.

A handful of nationalities which we deem over represented (Mexico, for one) are not allowed into the lottery. Every other applicant is thrown into a giant pot for drawing.

Surprise! People from decent pro-American countries like Japan are overwhelmed by turd world applicants. They almost never get drawn. Just about all the winners come from the turd world because they are the overwhelming number of applicants. Some of them might turn out to make decent Americans. Most of them, however, do not. Why do you suppose that it?

3
posted on 07/21/2011 11:01:37 AM PDT
by Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)

John Conyers (D-MI), the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, decried the SAFE Act because the diversity program has always been an important part of our immigration system," noting that it is the major source for African immigration.

I always thought slavery was the major source of African immigration. How could I have been so misled?

5
posted on 07/21/2011 11:18:39 AM PDT
by Mind-numbed Robot
(I retain the right to be inconsistent, contradictory and even flat-out wrong!)

If more Americans knew how this lottery operates they’d be truly outraged. I once talked to an Irish guy who entered and won a green card simply as the result of a Dublin pub bet. The program was the brainchild of Teddy Kennedy to keep his base well-stocked. Some potentially dangerous people from Islamic countries apply and come every year. Yet if you are a Mexican who wants to come legally you aren’t eligible to enter (too many Mexicans here already....not “diverse” enough).

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.