An analysis of the second amendment freedom and the threat of gun control

My hope is that history can be our guide this time, too. The Virginia Declaration of Rightsthough it mentioned the militia, did not mention a right to bear arms — the right might be implied, since the state did not furnish weapons for militiamen.

Revamping our drug and incarceration policies to keep kids in school and out of jail, and to remove the market incentives for illegal drug trafficking, would likely make a big dent in the percentage of young minorities living in cities who possess firearms.

We already see a heavy-handed government building under the leadership of Obama… the illegal and unbridled targeting of anyone who opposes them… wow, does that sound like something we would expect in Russia or what.

Discipline, Patience, Intelligence Using a mil-dot scope to figure out how far away an object is requires only a little simple math. You can buy illegal drugs on virtually any street corner, despite very aggressive drug laws… so what is the chance, for anyone following along with an ounce of common sense, is there that making firearms illegal is going to curb gun violence at the expense of citizen rights?

Places to Shoot Where do city-dwellers go to shoot their rifles? Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses.

If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens.

Instead, we must wonder whether the urge to own a gun for personal security rests more on a different, less concrete understanding of what constitutes a threat, and how best to handle that threat, whether it is imagined or real. That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law.

Are we engaging the youth of today? Notwithstanding the lengthy opinions in Heller and McDonald, they technically ruled only that government may not ban the possession of handguns by civilians in their homes. So the real question seems to be, can we have the a constitutional freedom to bear arms, and still allow restriction and regulation?

We are all united as citizens. These interpretations tend to lean in one of two ways. But at the same time, I hope it gets Second Amendment advocates who read it to stop and take a look around and ask themselves: Two years later, in McDonald v.

Republicans, democrats, libertarians… I appeal to you to evaluate the direction of our nation, the good and bad that candidates offer, and to vote according to the good of our nation, not the good of ANY party.

The statement in the English Bill of Rights concerning the right to bear arms is often quoted only in the passage where it is written as above and not in its full context. Learning about mil-dot, MOA, optics, shooting stances, trigger control, breathing, target acquisition, reloading, concealed carry laws, self-defense laws, hunting laws, etc.

The Supreme Court, in permitting the United States to apply a stamp tax to sawed-off shotguns a move, it was argued, that was intended to make such weapons de facto illegalessentially said that if a weapon does not contribute to the maintenance of a militia, and has no use in ensuring the common defense, it can be regulated United States v.

This will not only lessen the call for military establishments, but if circumstances should at any time oblige the Government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the People, while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights, and those of their fellow-citizens.

Gun ownership is indeed a right — but it is also a grand responsibility.

Some in the United States have preferred the "rights" argument arguing that the English Bill of Rights had granted a right. But as always, feel free to weigh in and articulate what worries you.

When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Instances of the licentious and outrageous behavior of the military conservators of the peace still multiply upon us, some of which are of such nature, and have been carried to such lengths, as must serve fully to evince that a late vote of this town, calling upon its inhabitants to provide themselves with arms for their defense, was a measure as prudent as it was legal: If we decide to do nothing, and allow unrestricted gun ownership, we run the risk of creating a society of the gun, a risk that seems too great to take.

For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

As for our right to own guns being God-given, well, maybe we should let God speak for herself on this matter. In fact, as if to show spite, the drug trade has increased exponentially since our war on drugs began… so much for the argument that laws solve moral issues. To find out more about Super PACs read my hub here.

More young people will grow up in an environment where there is no functional need to own a gun and where the idea of owning a gun seems alien. Miller, US [].Gun Rights FAQ Frequently Asked Gun Rights Questions: A Quick Primer on the Second Amendment How big of a threat is gun control?

In addition to these books, the Second Amendment Foundation possesses a library of many other gun-related books. In Indiana and Connecticut, after "red flag" laws to remove guns from people who may pose a threat were enacted, gun suicides Gun ownership is an American tradition older than the country itself and is protected by the Second Amendment; more gun control laws would infringe upon the right to bear arms.

freedom of religion and the. There are no gun control pros and cons guns do not kill people, sick people do.

Guns do protect people, and nations, that much is clear. Gun Control Facts – Statistics. Let us remove the veil of scare tactics and inflated nonsense. A discussion of the Constitutional Topic of the Second Amendment. Skip to Navigation; Skip to Content; U.S.

Constitution. The Constitution. gun control advocates began to read the 2nd Amendment one way. On the other side, firearm enthusiasts saw the attacks on gun ownership as attacks on freedom, and defended their interpretation of. Apr 28, · The 2nd Amendment Versus Gun Control: Stakeholders Analysis.

Updated on October 4, I gave you facts, not opinions. The murder rate is at its lowest when Gun Freedom is at its highest. The numbers don't lie.

We need to re-write the second amendment to make it appropriate for modern times and we need a way Reviews: We all know the threat that gun-grabbers pose to the Second Amendment. If Bloomberg and Co. succeed in passing more laws that disarm or subarm America, then the right to keep and bear arms will no longer be a right; it’ll be a European-style privilege reserved for a select few, mainly those with.