Fialho: Stop State-Sanctioned Sexual Assaults in Santa Ana

ByChristina Fialho |February 2, 2016

Gloria Hernandez came to the United States after suffering a brutal gang rape in her home country of Honduras. Now, Hernandez is in an immigration detention facility in Santa Ana, forced to relive her past sexual trauma in unlawful and routine strip searches at the Santa Ana City Jail.

Women who are civilly detained at the Santa Ana City Jail are strip searched after each in-person visit with an attorney, after each court hearing, and upon booking. These searches occur even when the officers have no specific reason to suspect concealment of contraband.

During these strip searches, no special provisions are made for the elderly or women with chronic physical pain. No special provisions are made for women who are on their menstrual periods. Sometimes they bleed directly onto the floor.

Hernandez twice attempted suicide because her trauma, exacerbated by these illegal searches, was too much to bear. Hernandez is one of 31 women in the custody of U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) at the Santa Ana City Jail.

They are parties to a civil rights complaint against the City of Santa Ana and ICE, filed on their behalf by Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement (CIVIC), a national organization that visits and monitors immigration detention facilities.

CIVIC along with a coalition of other organizations is calling for a federal investigation and an immediate end to this misguided policy and practice.

Women who try to challenge the strip searches are threatened with deportation or transfers to facilities farther away from their attorneys and support networks. After Nicole Albrecht, the lead complainant, resisted an unlawful strip search in late December, Santa Ana officers threatened to have ICE transfer her to Arizona.

Less than 72 hours later, Albrecht was transferred first to a holding cell in Arizona, then to the LaSalle Detention Facility in Louisiana and finally to the Chautauqua County Jail in New York. Less than 24 hours after CIVIC filed the complaint, ICE deported Albrecht with no warning to her attorney or her husband, a U.S. citizen.

Approximately half of the women included in this complaint have been forced to undergo strip searches by male officers.

One transgender woman was mocked by male officers when she was included in a mass strip search. When male officers were unable to find a piece of a broken plate in early January, they put an entire 64-person cellblock on lockdown for approximately three hours and performed a strip search on most of the women. There was no female officer present and the transgender women were not given the option to have a female officer perform the strip searches.

The policy and practice also violates California law, which prohibits strip searches without reasonable suspicion that the person is concealing weapons or contraband. The strip searches may also violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and may amount to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.

Illegal strip searches, which do nothing to improve safety and much to encourage abuse, have cost taxpayers millions of dollars in lawsuits.

In 2003, Los Angeles County revised its strip search policy after settling a suit for $2.7 million. San Bernardino County paid $25.5 million in 2007 to settle a class-action lawsuit against jailers who conducted illegal strip searches, sometimes in front of inmates and deputies of the opposite sex.

The women CIVIC has interviewed explain that the strip searches are humiliating and degrading. They are forced to expose vulnerable parts of their bodies to people who exercise power over them in nearly every way imaginable.

Studies have shown that strip searches exacerbate mental illness and make reentry into society more difficult. Strip searches cause psychological damage, such as sleep disturbance, recurrent and intrusive recollections of the event, inability to concentrate, anxiety, depression, and development of phobic reactions. Some victims of strip searches have developed Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and others, like Hernandez, have attempted suicide.

CIVIC hopes to see an end to immigration detention entirely. Meanwhile, we need to ensure that government officials do not continue to violate the law.

Christina Fialho is an attorney and co-executive director of Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement (CIVIC). She also is a board member of the ACLU of Southern California.

FILED UNDER:

RELATED STORIES

The unanimous decision came after more than three dozen public commenters spoke against the expansion and none supported it. Sheriff Sandra Hutchens said the expansion will bring an additional $5 million in revenue to the county without requiring more staff.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

While I don’t share Mr. Lucas’ assertion that we have lost our national identity by not being as big of a-holeys as we used to be, I still don’t buy into Ms. Fialho’s concerns about strip searches being inherently damaging to the psyche. To classify a properly done strip search as a sexual assault is more than a little ridiculous. It is also infuriating and belittling of women who actually HAVE been sexually assaulted. Properly done strip searches are done for the safety of inmates and staff. Like it or not, people hide weapons, drugs and other contraband in orfices. Happens all of the time. Strip searches can be done privately, respectfully and without a bunch of drama. Women who have their periods can be escorted into a bathroom, remove their tampon, conduct the search and be given a new one. While we, as Americans, do uphold the innocent until proven guilty stance, the fact remains that those who are in this country illegally have already committed a felony. They have violated the law. They knowingly, willingly and without any regard for the sovereign rights of this nation and it’s citizens, chose to break the law. When you break the law, you go to jail. When you go to jail, you get strip searched. When you go to jail, you eat what you are told, get up when you are told and do what you are told. This is why it is called JAIL, and not the Hyatt Regency. If you don’t want to have the government and its employees having “control over your life in every way imaginable”, then don’t break the law. What really chaps my hide is that the writer is a board member of the ACLU, an organization that has no interest WHATSOEVER in preventing the rape, abuse, robbery and killing of actual citizens, who are elderly and disabled, but they can get their knickers in a knot for people who are here, illegally. Absolutely ridiculous, and I will definitely stop my support and donations to the organization. The fact is, strip searches exist for a very good reason. They protect the inmate and the employees from violent offenders who would hide weapons or contraband where the sun don’t shine, so that they can keep breaking the law. The mere fact that a female, educated attorney, representing the ACLU (a group that once actually worked to help the citizens of this nation), can equate any kind of strip search with sexual assault? I find it deeply, inexcusably offensive, both as an educated woman and a survivor of REAL assault and abuse. Get a grip, lady.

Mstully00

If all is true as Ms. Fialho asserts why hasn’t she or the individuals’ attorneys not brought these alledged grievances before the courts? A first year law student could win punitive damages against any organization that allowed cross gender strip searches. Its easy to make unsubstantated assertions if wrong doing.

Paul Lucas

We, as a Nation, have lost our collective souls on civil rights and liberties issues. this type of behavior would not be as prevalent in the 1960s. People simply had a higher regard for the individual and were loathe to violate others in a way that is inconsistent with the values of America. We have lost a large piece of our National identity when we allow this to occur without intervention.