Studying history is a waste of time because it prevents us from focusing on the challenges of the present. People live in this present. They plan for and worry about the future. History, however, is the study of the past. Given all the demands that press in from living in the present and anticipating what is yet to come, the speaker concludes that studying history is a waste of time because it distracts us from current challenges. However, I do not agree with this opinion because history is essential to individuals and our society. In the first place, history helps us understand people and societies. It offers a storehouse of information about how people and societies behave. Understanding the operations of people and societies is difficult, though a number of disciplines make the attempt. An exclusive reliance on current data would needlessly handicap our efforts. How can we evaluate war if the nation is at peace—unless we use historical materials? How can we understand genius, the influence of technological innovation, or the role that beliefs play in shaping family life, if we don’t use what we know about experiences in the past? Some social scientists attempt to formulate laws or theories about human behavior. But even these resources depend on historical information, except for limited, often artificial cases in which experiments can be devised to determine how people act. Major aspects of a society’s operation, like mass election, missionary activities, or military alliance, cannot be set up as precise experiments. Consequently, history must serve, however imperfectly, as our laboratory, and data from the past must be served as our most vital evidence in the unavoidable quest to figure out why our complex species behave as it does in societal settings. This fundamentally, is why we cannot stay away from history: it offers the only extensive evidential base for the contemplation and analysis of how societies function, and people need to have some sense...

...Some may say that studying humanities, namely degrees like Philology or History, is not as useful as studying more pragmatic degrees like Economics or Engineering. Humanities are thought to be good for general knowledge, but unpractical and more often than not leading to poorly paid jobs the hundreds of students who enrol in these degrees year after year believe that humanities are not only useful and enriching on a personal level, but also essential to society as a whole.
The contribution of humanities is subtle and often goes unnoticed. For instance, successful communication, both written and oral, depends on the shared knowledge of certain rules and words. It is a philologist’s job to put together dictionaries and grammar books which are used in schools for the study of language. People would not be able to understand each other, were it not for the laborious work of the philologist.
Moreover, humanities give us a sense of identity. We would not be able to know who we are today without studyingHistory. Historians are the ones who keep track of all the events that have shaped a nation’s past. Not only do we need them to understand where we come from, but also to make sense of where we are going.
Finally, in spite of often being seen as disconnected from the real world, humanities ensure that society remains humane. We tend to forget that Ethics, which is a branch of Philosophy, provides...

...An Unforgettable Way of StudyingHistory
Hi! This is Sherwin Ang, a student from the University of the Philippines. At this point, I’m taking up History I, which tackles about the history of the Philippines in different aspects-political, social, cultural and economical. You may think it’s just like any other history class that just lets you memorize certain dates and events. Sometimes, we tend to ask," Why do we have to study history, the past is already the past?" But you know after you attend this course, you sure can have different perspectives of how important our history is to our lives.
Well, during the first few weeks we discussed three essays of Mr. Renato Constantino. These three works are one of my most favorite essays because it has opened my mind to the truth. I have realized how distorted our history and how miseducated most of us are.
The Origin of a Myth was written to object about our deep trust and belief to the false ideas and fallacies of our Western colonizer, the Americans. This was evidential when the Filipinos allowed the rule of the Americans in our country. They believed the Americans that we cannot govern ourselves so they have to help us do it. The essay also shows us how the Filipinos, even up to today, give no importance to our own revolution. I guess the Americans were successful in the their plan not only for the Philippines...

...Why Study History?
The introductions for the topic “what is history”, one written by Edwin Fenton and the
other by Peter N. Stearns each depicts why history is something essential and worth
studying and the significance of history as how events from the past impacts
the behaviour of individuals and changes in society. From the point of view of the
introduction written by Peter N. Stearns on the importance of history, he demonstrates
examples such as how history allows us to understand change and the society we live in
developed, the importance of history in our own lives, and how history contributes to
moral understanding. He provides numerous examples regarding the benefits of history
such as demonstrating how rates of alcoholism from the past allows us to realize
why the variations of rates for alcoholism to change and occur and establishes trends in
alcoholism as how addiction evolved into a social problem. He also signifies how history
can be of great importance in our own lives as discovering the ways people constructed
their ways of life previously contributes to another perspective human life and society.
He also suggests reasons on which why history proves identity, contributes to good
citizenship, and individual skills a student can develop when learning...

...﻿Sorayah Vuningoma
Professor Scott
English 101
Rough Draft
College is a waste of time and money
In Caroline Bird, “College is a waste of time and money,” Bird discusses why college is not necessary for everyone. She states that many college students are in college not because they want to but because they have to. Bird came to realize that college students don’t feel needed. They are led to believe that getting a college degree is important because it’s a way of getting higher chance of financial success which from Bird’s point of view is not always true. She gives examples of college students who have graduated and came to realize that college was a waste of time and money.
Bird says that if students think that college is not good for them then they shouldn’t be expecting them to respond positively to it. She states that college that doesn’t really bring social equality. She points out that parents send their children to college thinking that they will have financial benefits from the education they get but Bird thinks that it is the worst investment. Bird says that Americans are looking for a job where they “contribute”, “express themselves” and “use their special abilities,” and that colleges can help them find it. She says that there are colleges don’t prepare their students for the job market. She states that college have of little impact on things and/or people. Bird came...

...called by-products, as well.
Eg In the production of NaOH from NaCl the following reaction takes place:
2NaCl + 2H2O  2NaOH + H2 + Cl2
The atom economy of a reaction is the percentage of the total mass of reactants that can, in theory, be converted into the desired product. It can be calculated as follows:
% atom economy = mass of desired product x 100
total mass of products
Assuming we start with 2 moles of NaCl and 2 moles of H2O, we will make 2 moles of NaOH, and 1 mole of H2 and Cl2.
So % atom economy = (2 x 40) x 100 = 52.3 %
(2 x 40) + (1 x 2) + (1 x 71)
The remaining 47.7% of the mass is converted into less useful products and is hence wasted.
So the higher the atom economy, the less waste and the more efficient the product process (assuming the reaction does actually go to completion).
All reactions which have only one product have an atom economy of 100%
Atom economy is an important consideration when considering how to make a particular useful product.
SOLUTIONS
A solution is a homogeneous mixture of two or more substances in which the proportions of the substances are identical throughout the mixture.
The major component of a solution is called the solvent and the minor components are called the solutes. In most cases water is the solvent.
The amount of solute present in a fixed quantity of solvent or solution is called the concentration of the solution. It is usually measured in grams...

...of the Times from the 1850s and the turn o
f the century. How do you explain the changes and continuities in the Times
between these years?
The role of newspapers in society to comment on and help shape cultural
change has been evident since the first newspapers came into publication. The
ability of the papers to adapt these changes quickly and effectively goes hand in
hand with the longevity of the publication. This discussion will compare and
contrast two issues of the Times newspaper with the first one from the 1st of
January 1855 and the second from the 3rd of July 1899. The changes and
continuities in the Times between these years will be highlighted and explained.
A brief history on the development and implementation of the newspaper will be
discussed, along with the analysis to establish the need for some of the changes
made within the publication and the reasons for some of the continuities.
Established in 1785, the Times was founded by publisher John Walter in
1785 under the original name of The Daily Universal Register and converted to
the name of Times in 1788. Walter acted as owner and editor of the paper for
the next 17 years. Through Walker and the succession of the ownership and
editorship to his son, also named John Walker, the newspaper established and
enjoyed a reputation early on as an important and influential...

...to achieve. However, not all are successful in reaching what they aim for. This is what separates the true leaders from those who just say that they are one. The ability to be a catalyst for change is the determining factor of one being able to be a leader. Leaders such as Anna Hazare and Mohandas Gandhi used this skill to create a movement to ultimately meet their goals.This ability is the sole reason why our society was able to progress where it is today. From the phrase, “leadership as a catalyst for change in society,” it is safe to assume that it means a person rising to a leadership position in order to overcome injustices for the benefit of society.
A leader will rise to the occasion as a catalyst for change during desperate times, such as Anna Hazare during his anti-corruption strikes. The Indian government had repeatedly performed corrupt acts concerning the public so he decided that enough is enough. The Government corruption needed to be put to an immediate end. In the article, “Anna Hazare’s Anti Corruption Protest Sees Delhi Signal Compromise,” by Jason Burke (2011), Burke displays the effectiveness of Anna Hazare’s hunger strike by writing about how the strikes have escalated to a point of compromise. After providing information on previous protests, the author reveals Anna Hazare’s motives by stating, “Anna Hazare wants the government to create an anti-corruption ombudsman with sweeping powers.” (Burke) His dedication to end corruption in...

Study Tools

Company

Follow

{"hostname":"studymode.com","essaysImgCdnUrl":"\/\/images-study.netdna-ssl.com\/pi\/","useDefaultThumbs":true,"defaultThumbImgs":["\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_1.png","\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_2.png","\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_3.png","\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_4.png","\/\/stm-study.netdna-ssl.com\/stm\/images\/placeholders\/default_paper_5.png"],"thumb_default_size":"160x220","thumb_ac_size":"80x110","isPayOrJoin":false,"essayUpload":false,"site_id":1,"autoComplete":false,"isPremiumCountry":false,"userCountryCode":"US","logPixelPath":"\/\/www.smhpix.com\/pixel.gif","tracking_url":"\/\/www.smhpix.com\/pixel.gif","cookies":{"unlimitedBanner":"off"},"essay":{"essayId":33443884,"categoryName":"Periodicals","categoryParentId":"17","currentPage":1,"format":"text","pageMeta":{"text":{"startPage":1,"endPage":2,"pageRange":"1-2","totalPages":2}},"access":"premium","title":"Studying History Is a Waste of Time","additionalIds":[19,3,9,52],"additional":["Natural Sciences","Business \u0026 Economy","Entertainment","Business \u0026 Economy\/Organizations"],"loadedPages":{"html":[],"text":[1,2]}},"user":null,"canonicalUrl":"http:\/\/www.studymode.com\/essays\/Studying-History-Is-a-Waste-Of-230008.html","pagesPerLoad":50,"userType":"member_guest","ct":10,"ndocs":"1,500,000","pdocs":"6,000","cc":"10_PERCENT_1MO_AND_6MO","signUpUrl":"https:\/\/www.studymode.com\/signup\/","joinUrl":"https:\/\/www.studymode.com\/join","payPlanUrl":"\/checkout\/pay","upgradeUrl":"\/checkout\/upgrade","freeTrialUrl":"https:\/\/www.studymode.com\/signup\/?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.studymode.com%2Fcheckout%2Fpay%2Ffree-trial\u0026bypassPaymentPage=1","showModal":"get-access","showModalUrl":"https:\/\/www.studymode.com\/signup\/?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.studymode.com%2Fjoin","joinFreeUrl":"\/essays\/?newuser=1","siteId":1,"facebook":{"clientId":"306058689489023","version":"v2.9","language":"en_US"}}