The theme is cute, but I think it would have been funnier if it had aggressively misrepresented Kant (really, who could be easier to attack with quotes out of context?) rather than blandly repeating vague versions of his doctrines in a hostile tone.

“hullo Mrs Jones, we represent Party Associates, a polling firm employed by the Committee of Re-elect Immanuel Kant. We’d like to ask you the following question; If you received information that Friedrich Nietszche was a syphilitic anti-Semitic madman, would that make you more or less likely to vote for Immanuel Kant”

If the Gestapo knocked at your door and asked if your mother was home, would you tell them that she was? Of course you wouldn’t, but Immanuel Kant believes you should tell them that she is–even though you know they want to torture her.

Why does Kant not disavow the campaign contributions and statements of support of the Kantian nihilists? One of them was even seen to perform at a Kant campaign event!

I think there can be basically amoral people who justify their own behavior in the name of a very severe morality. The foreign fighter in Iraq who blows up 50 of his fellow Muslims because he is told to would be an example of a “religious nihilist” in this sense.