Five Myths About Breast Cancer

Cancer experts hope that this October, which is National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, brings more than just awareness about breast cancer but real facts, too.

While pink ribbons are everywhere as a means to raise awareness and show support to cancer patients, a survey commissioned by the National Breast Cancer Coalition reveals that most women know only half-truths about breast cancer, which will claim more than 40,000 lives in 2007.

The majority of the 1,000-plus women surveyed thought that heredity is the cause of most breast cancers. In reality, only 5 to 10 percent of those diagnosed with breast cancers have a family history. More than two-thirds of women with breast cancer have no known risk factors.

There is a strong genetic component. Women with certain mutations within the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have a 60- to 80-percent chance of developing breast cancer. Fortunately, this mutation is rare.

Obesity and alcohol are two other known risk factors, behind about 20 percent of breast cancers. Obesity nearly triples the risk of breast cancer, according to the Women's Health Initiative study of 85,917 postmenopausal women. And consuming four alcoholic drinks a day raises the risk by 1.5 times, according to the National Cancer Institute.

Yet, tragically, most women are developing breast cancer while leading relatively healthy lives.

Myth 2: One in eight women will get it this year

Most women in the survey thought that one in eight women will be diagnosed with cancer this year. Fortunately, no. That "one in eight" number tossed around refers to the lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Fewer than 200,000 women will be diagnosed this year. With approximately 150 million females in America, that translates to about one in 750 women.

Survival rates are quite good these days, too. The lifetime risk of dying from breast cancer for women is about one in 35, or 3 percent, according to the American Cancer Society.

Not to minimize breast cancer, but the greater cancer scourge—and utterly preventable—is lung cancer from cigarette smoking, constituting about a quarter of all cancer deaths and nearly 70,000 U.S. female deaths yearly. [Men can get breast cancer , too.]

Myth 3: Breast cancer is preventable

Most women surveyed thought that breast cancer can be prevented, particularly by eating fruits and vegetables. But when the biggest risk factors are being female and getting older, there's not much a woman can do. You can reduce but not eliminate the risk.

Studies have not shown convincingly that fruits and vegetables ward off breast cancer. However, the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study and other studies have revealed that lowering dietary animal fat lowers the risk of breast cancer, consistent with the notion that breast cancer rates are highest in regions with meat-heavy "Western" diets.

Myth 4: Self-examination is the solution

Early detection and treatment is key for breast cancer survival. Yet most survey respondents placed too much faith in self-examinations and mammograms . Mammograms are among the best diagnostic tools we have, but they are imperfect, revealing too many false positives and thus leading to worry and to unnecessary procedures. Mammograms also miss a surprising number of real, malignant cancers.

Similarly, self-examinations can be useful if done properly, but they do not reduce deaths due to breast cancer and they greatly increase the number of benign lumps detected, resulting in increased anxiety and unnecessary biopsies.

Myth 5: Abortions cause breast cancer

A persistent myth that the survey did not address is that abortions can cause breast cancer. This is based on real science—studies of rats in the 1980s indicating a possible correlation between hormones and breast tissue growth. But the issue was thoroughly resolved by the 1990s.

Nevertheless, the Bush Administration revisited the issue in 2002, gave equal weight to the earlier, smaller studies showing a correlation, and told the National Cancer Institute to state the possible abortion-cancer connection in its fact sheets and Web site. It took Congressional action and a three-day conference on the topic to remove this erroneous information by 2003.

Christopher Wanjek is the author of the books “Bad Medicine” and “Food At Work.” Got a question about Bad Medicine? Email Wanjek. If it’s really bad, he just might answer it in a future column. Bad Medicine appears each Tuesday on LiveScience.

Author Bio

Christopher Wanjek,

Christopher Wanjek is the Bad Medicine columnist for Live Science and a health and science writer based near Washington, D.C. He is the author of two health books, "Food at Work" (2005) and "Bad Medicine" (2003), and a comical science novel, "Hey Einstein" (2012). For Live Science, Christopher covers public health, nutrition and biology, and he occasionally opines with a great deal of healthy skepticism. His "Food at Work" book and project, commissioned by the U.N.'s International Labor Organization, concerns workers health, safety and productivity. Christopher has presented this book in more than 20 countries and has inspired the passage of laws to support worker meal programs in numerous countries. Christopher holds a Master of Health degree from Harvard School of Public Health and a degree in journalism from Temple University. He has two Twitter handles, @wanjek (for science) and @lostlenowriter (for jokes).