... it's looking like "ice pellets" are in the forecast .... still early yet, but ....

does anyone know when the call is made for a change?

Let's be honest, nobody really expects the Redskins to do well. The Redskins average under 8 wins a season It's not the players or the coaches fault. It's time to get rid of Bruce Allen & change the way we manage this franchise

Weather is a fickle thing. It's about as easy to predict as the stock market. So no surprise, Monday brings a much different viewpoint for the weather during Super Bowl XLVIII than the weekend did. Now all of a sudden "mostly clear" is in play.

The Weather Channel, with less than a week remaining until the game kicks off, has SUN showing on Super Bowl Sunday and -- unlike this past Sunday -- a very minimal chance of precipitation for the game.

Even the winds are looking kind of wimpy at 5 mph.

It's unlikely the Seahawks actually care about what the weather is, although their style of play would theoretically work better in the elements, at least against the Broncos. Peyton Manning should be jumping up and down, though. This sort of forecast favors him tremendously.

Weather Underground is featuring a similar forecast. Highs of 37 for Sunday along with a low (20 percent) chance of rain or snow? The 10 mph winds are a little different from above but that's still basically nothing.

which QB do I want 'managing the game' no matter what the weather is, Peyton Manning or Russell Wilson?

that's a really hard choice

no matter what the weather is on Sunday, which QB is going to be able to make the right call at the line of scrimmage, Peyton Manning or Russell Wilson?

that's another really hard choice

If one team is trailing in the 4th quarter, which QB has the best chance of taking the offense down the field, Peyton Manning or Russell Wilson?

hmmm, let me think about that for a while ...

Let's be honest, nobody really expects the Redskins to do well. The Redskins average under 8 wins a season It's not the players or the coaches fault. It's time to get rid of Bruce Allen & change the way we manage this franchise

Patriots v Giants - another example of the better team losing - it happens

the Seahawks could win the game but they are not 'better' than the Broncos - If the Seahawks were the better team they would be 'favored'

most every analyst is looking for ways that the Seahawks could 'upset' the Broncos - almost nobody thinks the Seahawks win this game if they both play well

the weather is looked at and 'analyzed' from the aspect of how does it hurt the Broncos and help the Seahawks - why not the other way around?

Let's be honest, nobody really expects the Redskins to do well. The Redskins average under 8 wins a season It's not the players or the coaches fault. It's time to get rid of Bruce Allen & change the way we manage this franchise

SkinsJock wrote: If the Seahawks were the better team they would be 'favored'

Well that couldn't be more untrue.

that's interesting - explain how "it could not be more untrue" for the better team not to be 'favored' to win the game

Let's be honest, nobody really expects the Redskins to do well. The Redskins average under 8 wins a season It's not the players or the coaches fault. It's time to get rid of Bruce Allen & change the way we manage this franchise

I'll agree that the betting lines have nothing to do with which team is better but I do not agree with the statement that my post "could not be more untrue" - that's just typical BS from you ... it might not be the case, but to overstate the point with the words "more untrue" is so 'over-the-top' typical of you trying to make a point

and

if you think the majority of NFL fans (outside the bookies) really believe that the Seahawks are a better team than the Broncos, you are wrong

Let's be honest, nobody really expects the Redskins to do well. The Redskins average under 8 wins a season It's not the players or the coaches fault. It's time to get rid of Bruce Allen & change the way we manage this franchise

SkinsJock wrote:I'll agree that the betting lines have nothing to do with which team is better but I do not agree with the statement that my post "could not be more untrue" - that's just typical BS from you ... it might not be the case, but to overstate the point with the words "more untrue" is so 'over-the-top' typical of you trying to make a point

If you know anything about logic or math, then you would know that true/untrue(false) are boolean values. Either 1 or 0, yes or no, true or untrue. So no, it could not be more untrue.