Newspapers and news sites in the Netherlands today extensively broke the news of the findings of a research team led by Professor Jaap Sinninghe Damste — a leading molecular paleontologist at Utrecht University and winner of the prestigious Spinoza Prize — about the melting icecap of the Kilimanjaro, the African mountain that became a symbol of anthropogenic global warming.

Professor Sinninghe Damste’s research, as discussed on the site of the Dutch Organization of Scientific Research (DOSR) — a governmental body — shows that the icecap of Kilimanjaro was not the result of cold air but of large amounts of precipitation which fell at the beginning of the Holocene period, about 11,000 years ago.

The melting and freezing of moisture on top of Kilimanjaro appears to be part of “a natural process of dry and wet periods.” The present melting is not the result of “environmental damage caused by man.”

Professor Damste studied organic biomarker molecules in the sediment record of Lake Challa, near Mount Kilimanjaro, and reconstructed the changes and intensity of precipitation in this part of Africa over the last 25,000 years. They observed an 11,500 year cycle of intense monsoon precipitation.

In the dry period between 12,800 and 11,500 years ago, Kilimanjaro was ice-free.

At the end of this period, a dramatic climate change from very dry to very wet took place — driven by changes in solar radiation — resulting in the creation of an icecap. At the moment, this part of Africa seems to be at the end of a similar dry period, resulting in the disappearance of the famous icecap.

DOSR calls Al Gore’s iconic use of the melting cap of Kilimanjaro “unfortunate” — since it now seems to be mainly the result of “natural climate variations.”

The most telling phrase in the article:
“…driven by changes in solar radiation.”

This is why I have absolutely no faith in climate prediction models. The amount of energy radiated by the sun is neither constant nor predictable. Perhaps most shockingly, the sun’s radiation cannot be controlled by Al Gore, Barack Obama, The United Nations, the CRU, the IPCC or the Screen Actors Guild.

7. Paul from Hamburg: “This is why I have absolutely no faith in climate prediction models. The amount of energy radiated by the sun is neither constant nor predictable. Perhaps most shockingly, the sun’s radiation cannot be controlled by Al Gore, Barack Obama, The United Nations, the CRU, the IPCC or the Screen Actors Guild.”

My understanding of the history here is that there was widespread DENYAL of Solar Energy Variation by Climateologioliars…

Heretofore when someone in politics started pushing an agenda and they stood to become a gazillionaire from it that person would have been shoved out the door. Al Gore is a snake oil salesman with a Nobel Prize. Decency and integrity would have pointed out this vile conflict of interest and called him on it. Why did it not happen with a deafening chorus of outrage? Because he is a red winger with a lot of flacks covering his fraud and his swindle? If you are an international socialist like Mr. Gore you get a free pass to pull off the biggest con game of the century. He should be stripped of the prize and indicted. What did he know and when did he know it.

Why don’t these folks spend some of their time and energy on environmental problems we can all see and agree upon? Industrial waste in China or cleaning up the million square miles of trash in the middle of the Pacific? That isn’t as glamorous, but at least they can explain the cause and effect without resorting to cooking the books.

Also, the amount of ice and snow on Kilimanjaro right now is about the same as it was when Ernest Hemingway wrote his short story “The Snows of Kilimanjaro” in 1935. There is some annual variation, but the overall size of the snowcap hasn’t changed noticeably since before World War Two.

This sort of calls into question the whole “sudden decrease in the last quarter of the 20th Century” thing.

Of course, there’s nothing like getting the facts straight from the horse’s mouth. As regards Al Gore, this series of statements sums it up succinctly;

“Al is a radical environmentalist who wants to change the very fabric of America.”

“He criticizes America for being America- a place where people enjoy the benefits of an advanced standard of living.” (Notably himself- ed.)

“He has no sense of proportion; He equates the failure to recycle aluminum cans with the Holocaust.”

“He believes our civilization, itself, is evil (because it is, in his words, ‘addicted to the consumption of the earth.’)”

A screed from a Cato institute fundraising letter? A statement from Senator Inhofe?

No.

These statements are from a 1992 Democratic National Committee memo by Jonathan Sallet to the Clinton campaign, explaining why Gore would be a poor choice for Clinton’s running mate.

You may notice, it didn’t stop Clinton from taking him on. Or the DNC pulling out all the stops in 200 to try to “sue” him into the Oval Office.

It isn’t just Gore’s judgment or contact with reality that is questionable. It’s exactly how devoted the “progressive” movement as a whole is to the facts, as opposed to their dogmas and apparently limitless lust for power.

From all indications, in this race, the facts consistently finish dead last.

Don’t let anyone get away with this. CO2 plus H2O does make carbonic acid H2CO3 but this is a very weak acid. Partly neutralized it and you get baking soda NaHCO3. Hard water will fully neutralize it to CaCO3 and MgCO3 better known as limestone.

The GW people will tell you that carbonic acid endanger coral. Coral excretes limestone to protect it’s self and “acidification of the oceans” endager them. But Limestone that forms in salt water is resistant to HCl. The Stone under Niagara falls is made from oceanic limestone and is very strong. Sea shells are also oceanic limestone. The HCl is your stomic can’t brake sea shells down.

In addition corals are in the fossil record going back before flouring plants evolved. It was flouring plants that lowered the CO2 levels below 1000ppm. Corals have lived with CO2 in the air for a long time and in-fact need it just as all life on earth does.

Let’s say the truth:
the right-wing-nuts have given BILLIONS to HALLIBURTON to transport millions of tons of snow to the top of the Kilimanjaro. BLACKWATER is taking care of the security and no witness can survive to tell us the truth.
And BUSH is building a sky resort there, to finance his library.

AND
if I don’t put a
SARC tag
some troll will agree with this post !!!

You may be right but I think the fallback for the AGW proponents will be the “precautionary principle.” “Aw–the data might not be valid but we must act as if it was, because if AGW is real we must act now.”

Amazing it is that we must use the precautionary principle when it comes to technology but no thought is ever given to it when it comes to the field of “social engineering.”

There is no dought those still supporting AGW after the release of these emails depise this country. This group includes obama and the socialist democrats. We now have the ammunition from the emails to challenge and defeat these non-americans in debate and then send their commies asses packing in the next elections. Gore is toast.

At this point does anyone with even two brain cells that function think that fat Al is anything other that a hypocritical—and very, very successful–con artist?

Hello! Check fat Al’s humongous 20 room, 8 bedroom house that last year used the electricity equivalent to that used by 232 average sized houses, his large, luxurious house boat, his travel arrangements with fleets of gas guzzling SUVs and private jets, the fifty fold increase in his net worth since 2000–$2 million to $100 million, and his ownership of the “carbon offset” trading company that will be a major beneficiary if governments take drastic steps to limit “Man-Made Climate Change,” which, incidentally used to be “Anthropogenic Global Warming,” which used to be the “Hole in the Ozone Layer,” which used to be the “Coming Ice Age,” etc., etc.

But, unfortunately, when people fall for a load of crap so completely, there are embarrassed to be exposed as fools and very reluctant to readily admit their mistake, so be prepared for lots of, “yeah the Kilimanjaro example was wrong, but what about those Polar bears?

You may be right but I think the fallback for the AGW proponents will be the “precautionary principle.” “Aw–the data might not be valid but we must act as if it was, because if AGW is real we must act now.”

To which I’d respond:

Well then perhaps we need to start putting stakes through the heart of our dead, beheading them and then burying the head and body separately; because if vampires are real we have to prevent them from rising again.
While we’re at it a bullet to the brain might be prudent as well, because you know zombies might be real too.

How about “Now, published in the December 1 issue of Geology, comes a remarkable—and remarkably courageous—study from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution that shows many denizens of the oceans benefit hugely from that increased CO2.” as discussed at: http://www.climateconversation.wordshine.co.nz/

I guess it is a real comedown when you discover that–instead of saving Mother Gaia, the Polar Bear, and the three toed Squongee in Thailand–you are really just a “cash cow,” milked to pay for fat Al’s livin’ large, and handing him and others on the Left–who think you are dumb, that they are way smarter than you are, and that they know much better than you what’s best for you, and how to run the lives of all the “little people” like you–your freedom in the process.

I like the solar radiation link hypothesis, but I’m more inclined to accept other, simpler explanations. I live at 7,000 ft above sea level in the mountains of the southern Rockies. Snow and ice will sublimate at low pressure (i.e. high altitude) and low humidity (like we experience here in the high mountain desert). In bright sun roads covered in snow and ice will clear and become dry even if the temperature doesn’t get above freezing. They don’t necessarily melt…the snow and ice pass from solid form to gaseous form (like dry ice or moth balls). I never witnessed this while growing up in Michigan (about 300 ft above sea level) but I see it every year here.

Changes in land use around Kilimanjaro (i.e. deforestation) resulted in a lower humidity climate. Kilimanjaro, I believe, is over 19,000 ft in elevation at its peak and the snowfield is never above freezing. Snow and ice have been sublimating from its peak since long before the industrial age. In fact, most of the snow cap had disappeared many years before Hemmingway wrote The Snows of Kilimanjaro in 1936.

If they get it there quick enough, the Committee could have it re-engraved real quick so they can pass it off to Barack Obama. Better still, when it comes time to take it away from Obama, they’ll only have to re-engrave one letter to give it to the probable next recipient.

# 31 marsouin:
The early ’90s were also about the hole in the ozone layer. Two German scientist friends of mine were doing work in labs at my school on new refrigeration systems that would prevent the depletion of ozone from the atmosphere (something to do with freon).

Anybody here knows what’s happened to that ozone layer since? I haven’t followed the issue … been too busy workin’ to pay my rent and for the perfectly good fridge that comes with the apartment and meets my modest needs.

Here’s the thing. Every link you posted is in Dutch. And the one link you posted in English is in the LETTERS PAGE OF NATURE! Unless I misunderstand what they mean by letters–and its quite possible–they did not publish an article, but rather a letter.

You haven’t even tried to be credible here. It makes me wonder if you are writing to an audience already convinced of certain ideas; anyone else would be embarrassed to publish something so poorly sourced.

Btw, what no one seems to have noticed yet is this quote from Georg Kaser:

“All studies which investigate tropical glacier retreat and climate show the dominance of changes in energy and mass balance terms which are related to the atmospheric moisture content rather than locally measured air temperatures. Both increased and reduced moisture can lead to negative mass balances and it has done so in most cases studied (Cordillera Blanca, Peru, Cordillera Real, Bolivia, Antisana, Ecuador, Rwenzori, Mt. Kenia, Kilimanjaro)”

PLease excuse my ignorance, but isn’t CO2 released when the oceans warm? I could swear I read in The P.I.G. to climate change and environmentalism, (I loaned it out so can’t refer to it) that the oceans hold CO2 when cooler and release it when it warms, and the claim in the book was that this was a source of CO2, more so than AGW.
eon, can you confirm that for me please?
I, too would like more info from ruebecca @17. I’m a complete sceptic, always have been and always will be, but I like having my facts straight.
over

Interesting stuff on solar cycles including the Maunder Minimum. Maybe it helps explain how some of the past temperature changes have been accompanied by the movement of the magnetic poles. I never could see what the connection might be but maybe difference in the charges of the solar radiation mentioned in the article may contribute to that.

The AGW folks do build some of the possibilities for solar forcing into their models and can answer you (apparently) on why condition x can’t be just solar-caused. The skeptics, or is it the deniers? stand accused by te AGWers of being interested only in disproving AGW, not really caring about what IS going on. Does Steve McInintyre really care about climate, or just proving that Jones and Co are wrong? Beats the hell out of me.

The ice cap on Kilimanjaro cannot be “melting” because temperatures there have remained well below freezing. Consequently, the ice is disappearing because of sublimation, a phenomenon wherein, under certain conditions of pressure and temperature, a substance changes from its solid state (ice) directly to its gaseous state (water vapor) without ever assuming its liquid state (water). This phenomenon is responsible for the shrinkage and eventual disappearance of ice cubes in your freezer – and contributes to the shrinkage of glaciers and other exposed ice when there is insufficient snow to replenish. (It is also why frozen CO2 is called “dry ice.”)

This may seem like a trivial distinction, but to use “melting” implies temperatures above freezing, and the hoopla is all about rising temperatures (when they are not).

I just saw a Finnish documentary on this, and MacIntyre was interviewed. He says he began by listening to a few of the AGW types making proclamations that seemed sloppy to him, so he decided as a mathematician to ‘audit’ them, to get their data and perform their experiments and confirm their assertions.

He didn’t start out ‘trying to prove them wrong’, but only suspicious and wanting to be SURE of what they were saying.

Their subsequent vile and deceptive behavior, of course, made him into an adversary of theirs, but it was their fault. He did not begin as an adversary, only as a curious scientist.

Now they’re in ‘full a$$h0le mode’, and he has his back up, as would any sane person. But his math is beyond reproach, and their data is now confirmed to be so sloppy as to be useless in reaching any repeatable conclusion, in spite of which the AGW people INSIST LOUDLY that there is only ONE conclusion possible.

and it involves worldwide taxation and permanent diminishment of America… quel surprise.

“CO2 Causes Warming; Except when it doesn’t. As noted above, temperature increases preceded CO2 increases (often by substantial periods of time); over s few periods the lines cross, such that when temperature is rising, CO2 levels are falling or vice versa.

“In 2005 testimony to Canada’s Commons Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, Carleton University paleoclimatologist Professor Tim Patterson noted that ‘There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth’s temperature over this (geologic) time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half-billion years.’

“Devastating to Gore’s claim (in the movie-ed.), during the movie’s June 2006 opening his temperature chart appeared in ‘Science’ magazine, the abstract of which began ‘During the early Pliocene, 5 to 3 million years ago, ‘”

The basic mechanism is, as you state, that seawater “holds” CO2 better when it’s cold, and releases it when it warms up. Which means to get the CO2 out of solution something else has to heat the seawater first. Saying that the CO2 causes the warming when the warming has to precede the CO2 release is a classic example of putting the cart before the horse.

“During the early Pliocene, 5 to 3 million years ago, globally averaged temperatures were substantially higher than they are today, even though the external factors that determine climate were substantially the same.”

This is just another way to take the money from one groupe and give it to another. Someone should do a freedom of information look at all of Al’s Emails during this time when he was The Vice Pres. I bet you would find lot’e of emails from him to these un- scientist who are in the middle of this. I think that these so called scientist should be stripped of their jobs and any thing they published about this topic should be retracted from these jurnals the published in.

eon @50 Thank you very much for that entry. I’m sorry to have you expend so much time and effort on the computer, perhaps I can give you my fax# and we can exchange hand-written stuff! (lol)
Seriously, though, thanks.
techgm @48, Good info, also. Thanks. I always wondered why there was so much frost in my freeezer, even in winter with low ambient humidity. Is that what causes freezer-burn then?
over

If even the hash-head Dutch have figured it out then there might be hope after all.
The wheels are off and the global warming jalopy is smoking in the ditch.
This has been a good week. But don’t for a minute think that this is going away. Anything that has John Holdren and Van Jones working on it will have to have a stake driven through it.

Apparently, professor Damste’s work has not been adequately “peer-reviewed.” If it had been, it would certainly confirm Al Gore’s conclusions.

I still don’t understand how Al Gore can spend millions building a huge home/office, not employ a single green technology in its construction, and still be taken seriously by the green community.

If there are any warm-mongers out there, please explain this to me and don’t tell me about his solar panels because he only installed those after conservative talk radio hosts started pointing out his hypocrisy.

#55 Tammy
The correct saying is from First Timothy 6:9-10
9People who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin and destruction. 10For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.

I’d say this describes the global warning gang. They simply ignore that big yellow ball in the sky. Days without sunspots for 2009 is among the top five since measuring sun activity.

But at least the Dutch economy will be positively effected by Copenhagen. The wonderfully moral people and government officials that are concerned about climate change (according to Dutch news services) greatly increase the demand on the city’s legal prostitution service. So much so they have to bring in more workers. Now that’s a stimulus plan Obama didn’t think of – yet? I wonder where Bill Clinton will be?

Here’s another common, ie not super brilliant climatologist, guy’s take on temperature & Kilimanjaro. He’s a numbers cruncher who’s been intrigued by the temp data supporting climate change, and like many, is usually disappointed.

I can’t believe the number of people I have spoken too (in the USA) who don’t have any knowledge of “Climategate”. It’s like we are living in alternate universes. We must spread the word to the unwashed and not just preach to the choir because the major media outlets are going to continue to stonewall on this in order to save the progressive agenda.

The use of Kilimanjaro by alarmists has long been a yardstick for measuring their scientific integrity or, more appropriately, the lack of it. Many earlier works are consistent with the new study and show that the Kilimanjaro snow cap variations have nothing to do with global temperature changes.

More music-”hide the decline” set to 1968 song by Tommy James and the shondells
“drawing the line”
Making up data along the way
fudging the numbers day by day
ig noring the cold and the snow in a downward line
hide the decline(repeat)
Michael Mann thinks hes so smart
with his phony hockey stick chart
ignoring the cold and the snow in a downward line
hide the decline(repeat)hide the decline(repeat)
climate change, youve seen your better days
its about the time
to face your crime
hide the decline(repeat)hide the decline(repeat)

I hope that every doctoral student who had their legitimate thesis work crushed by the AGW zealots and every scientist who was shut out of their “peer review process” is dusting off their data and reports and begin an avalanche.

If “climategate” doesn’t get legs and run off, at least it’s opened the door for real scientists to get the real science out.

Get ready for the big revival, c’mon everybody get in the van
There’s a little hut on Eagle Mountain, it’s called The Blood of the Eco Man
If your faith ain’t strong enough child, you might wind up dead
Praise the Al Gor and pass me a carbon credit

Reverend Gore, he struts and dances while the guitar plays “We are the World”
He testifies in tongues of fire, with tears of joy runnin’ down his face
He ain’t sure and we ain’t sure what exactly he said
Praise the Al Gore and pass me a carbon credit

You won’t find many hypocrites that’ll take a chance on gettin’ bit
But a true believer can survive CO2 and the big lie

When you hold that deadly CO2, keep the Al Gore in your mind
Do not lose your concentration or that CO2 is bound to strike
Either way you won’t forget the first time that you said
Praise Al Gore and pass me a carbon credit
Praise Al Gore and pass me a carbon credit
Oh that’s right
Praise Al Gore and pass me a carbon credit

8 wancow
You are aware that the link you site is the “Global Climate Change Student Guide.” That Guide buys into AGW hook line and sinker, so referencing it is a bit self serving, oh sorry, forget I said that.

Am I wrong, or did I not read that the prediction is for a rise of .7 of 100ths a degree rise in the next 100 years? What’s the rush? We could delay any action for ten years and not risk too much nor it be too long a delay.

We have time to check and recheck, first the sources, second, their figures, then their computations, then to verify the interpretations of their computations, then for various authorities to repeat and duplicate these experiments, so that there is a greater concensus that gives us more assurance, or that the dissenters are able to prove the reasons for their doubts and stop us from making a huge error that greatly affects the international community.

We’ve been rushed into the Chicken Little approach to a huge scientific problem, THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING. There are 11,588,545 square miles in Africa, for example, but the sparcity of true data to base conclusions on seems inane. How many souces of reliable information, how many recording stations, and for what period of time, do we have for covering 11 million square miles of African mountains, deserts, cities, coastal areas, and deep forests?

The other fable is THE KING WHO HAD NO CLOTHES!

Have you heard the story of Alarmist Al Gore,
The phony film-maker and international bore?
He jets around the world, dispensing hot air,
One his way to becoming a Billionaire,
Methinks that the man is a scienctific whore.

Have you heard the story of the liar, Al Gore,
Phoney film-maker and Internation bore?
Jetting around the world dispensing his hot-air,
Screwing the public, while becoming a Billionaire,
He’s the world’s biggest pseudo-science whore.

There are people in this world who are starving due to a lack of food to eat. Plants are the most basic edible food. Therefore: people are starving due to a lack of plants to eat.

CO2 is plant food. In order to grow, plants require CO2. Less CO2 means less plants or smaller plants. Therefore: people are starving due to a lack of CO2 to support growing the plants they need to eat.

I’ve long been saying to anyone who will listen that as a Ham radio operator I pay a lot of attention to sunspot cycles since they strongly influence radio propagation. This past eleven year cycle, which coincidentally corresponds to the lower average temperatures recorded on earth was one of the least active on record. Before that we experienced much more active cycles which was when the global warming craze started. The sun may not be the only determinant in global warming, but it sure makes sense to me that is the biggest. Of course the enlightened ones can’t get research grants, Noble Prizes, Oscars, trips to Copenhagen, or your tax dollars from trying to control the sun’s behavior.

64. Dan: “But at least the Dutch economy will be positively effected by Copenhagen. The wonderfully moral people and government officials that are concerned about climate change (according to Dutch news services) greatly increase the demand on the city’s legal prostitution service. So much so they have to bring in more workers.”

So you’re saying there are not enough prostitutes in Copenhagen so they have to import reinforcements from the Netherlands?

This whole mess isn’t about global cooling…..warming or climate change. It’s about the leftist idea of global social justice. Global redistribution of wealth from advanced countries to third world countries. In other words 500 billion-900 billion in reparations due to the advancements of Western civilization.

#79ExPat wrote:
I’ve long been saying to anyone who will listen that as a Ham radio operator I pay a lot of attention to sunspot cycles since they strongly influence radio propagation. This past eleven year cycle, which coincidentally corresponds to the lower average temperatures recorded on earth was one of the least active on record.
————

One of the things I have learned in my recent AGW putterings is that their models DO try to account for sunspot cycles, whether accurately, or not, who can say? I think that they put sunspot influence at about 2%. But the underlying question that is becoming more clear to me is: what will happen when the sunspot cycle goes back to normal, or normal high? CO2 is accumulating and the higher it gets the higher we can expect temperatures to be, all things being equal and they never are.

Frankly, I can’t see how we can avoiding burning most of the petro carbon which is readily available for at least the next 20-50 years, because it is just not cost-effective to go any other way. That means that the underlying potential for greater warmth will always be increasing and we’d better hope that whatever “natural” influences caused the MWP do not return full force ON TOP OF our accumulated CO2. I don’t see any way in which we can sequester all the carbon we are releasing which has been stored for millions of years, so I am somewhat fatalistic about the whole thing. Irony of ironies, it turns out that sulfites, which we have been killing ourselves to take out of the atmosphere and they are noxious pollution, actually to some degree offset the greenhouse effect of CO2. Maybe technology can eventually figure out a way to recapture carbon from CO2 on a massive scale, faster than plants can do it, but that is hard to imagine right now.

He in all that time has a very big conflict of interest,with his many investments,that would greatly benefit from his misleading,twisted and just plain lying scaremongering of the state of the climate.

$10 Billion Dollars & More per Year For a Fraud?
Canadians are interested in results of what is going on about Climategate in Canada! As it has to do with our lives,lifestyle whether or not we are going to be living in a Democracy or under a Dictatorship?
Jim prentice has stated & PM Harper advocates this as well otherwise Prentice wouldn’t be uttering it”Canada will be paying it’s fair share of Carbon Emmissions! To the tune of $10 Billion per year!” Really, we are already $70 Billion in debt thanks to Michael Ignatieff & the Liberals who up’ed the anti to the Canadian debt load on stimulus!
This begs the question where Jim Prentice plans to dig the $10 Billion per year out of? Did somebody say more Tax?
What is so disheartening about that is the fact that now it’s been found that the whole Climate Emission scam has been proven to be Fraudulent as credible Scientests around the world who were previously locked out of putting their work and findings forth by Jones of East Anglia University and the CRU,were pushed out of the picture with thier observations and experiment results on Climate Change found that not only is the earth not heating up in reality it has been cooling since the 1960’s!
How much more fraudulent can this Scientific Data be? The United Nations and the Globalists are using this false Data at Copenhagen, to transfer our wealth to third world countries? Yet Environment Minister Jim Prentice and Prime Minister Stephen Harper feel so generous with Canadian Tax payer dollars that they are willing to toss in $10 Billion per year on the “hot air” that Ban Kai Moon and Pompus PM Gordon Brown and the rest of the Criminal Rogues that are involved in this bogus Carbon Emission Treaty! As the Bible says,”A Fool and his money are soon parted”! To request that PM Harper doesn’t sign the Copenhagen Treaty, causing Canadians to lose their Sovereignty and Freedom email the PM at: pm@pm.gc.ca,Protest Copenhagen Treaty http://www.gopetition.com/online/32485.html

There are four reasons the UN and IMF, Global Elitist Members Re: Ban Kai Moon ( Who has openly expressed his stong desire for Global Governance ), PM Gordon Brown, Bilderberg Member Henry Kissinger, Senior Bilderberg Member David Rockefeller as well as an unprecedented number of Dictators that run various countries who are members of the United Nations this Copenhagen Treaty that was designed to acquire four goals, the least of them being climate improvment or protection as Lord Moncton has stated!
(1.) To de-industrialize Sovereign Countries ( No Jobs keep you dependant on State ) ( 2.) Take your money and assets – Hence, Fraudulent Carbon Emmissions and Carbon Gases for Carbon Credits and Carbon Taxes! (3.) Take away your property (4.) Take away your Sovereignty and Freedom!
Check out what Government is doing behind your back at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

They were right in believing that they could get the majority of the gullible, herd following, lemmings on the left to believe their fake science as long as it was blamed on the evil Western world, especially the United States. They were right that their leftist supporters would never ask for proof as long as the right crowd at the top of the leftist world was promoting their lies. They were right in thinking that the average liberal in this country believes anything that the leftist media propaganda machine tells them without even thinking about it.

Basically, they were right on matters concerning the limited intellect the average liberal applies to their beliefs and even their daily life.

Let’s see here: 3/4 of your “readers” believe the world was only created 5,000 years ago, when Jesus was riding around on dinosaurs. And this should be a compelling thesis to them?

And, new research that suggests that the mountain was “ice-free” only 11,500 years ago is now, somehow indisputably, part of some “natural cycle” that you all readily, wholeheartedly agree upon – why, there could be no other reason, none whatsoever!

Suck on that, Al Gore! It was release by a dutch scientist! And even though every single one of the 1,000′s of scientific articles you’ve ever referenced is (again, somehow indisputably) wrong, this one is certainly right!

One wonders, what were the living conditions for, ummmmmm, I don’t know, how about humans?, during that warm spell 11,500 years ago?

BTW – When you hear left say “the stupid, it burns”, that’s not referencing sun spots that created “Decade of 2000s was warmest ever, scientists say” (even Dutch ones!!)

When will the Carbon Bubble crash? Europeans have had this frenzy before, but not quite on a scale like this since Dutch Tulip craze. Now that they are locked down under one corrupt Euroregime in Brussels who knows what crazy scheme they might come up with next? Remind me again why we’re supposed to emulate them?

As it has been for a long time the science shows the whole thing to be a hoax, but then it’s never been about science, or the climate. It’s about moving money and it’s about power. What saddens me is the number of lemmings who are willing to run off the cliff with only the knowledge they glean from a 30 second TV or radio spot. Most people are too lazy to bother.

Clear-Eyed Visionaries Of The Truth, Unite! While you wholeheartedly endorse this single “scientific finding” and you trash the thousands of other scientific findings as not merely wrong but the product of a huge Conspiracy Theory, you ignore a canary in the coal mine that most of the real money in the world simply refuses to ignore. The insurance industry. Insurance companies live or die by the financial risks they take. Take a look at what the insurance companies are DOING. Not saying, but DOING. The increased ferocity of storms in an altered climate does not fit actuarial tables, and the insurance industry doesn’t care whose gums are flapping about whether Al Gore is a criminal or not. The insurance companies are simply adjusting. To What? To a changing climate that refuses to be predicted. Get right with the world, all you Clear-Eyed Purveyors Of Truth! Start hating the insurance industry with as frothy-mouthed a frenzy as you have reserved for Gore and that massive non-Dutch scientific community. The insurance industry makes money. Must, therefor, be a conspiracy. And that is oh so wrong.