Abstract

What would happen if cost benefit analysis were applied to disclosure regulations? Mandated disclosure has largely escaped rigorous CBA because it looks so plausible: Disclosure seems rich in benefits and low in cost. This article makes two arguments. First, it previews the thesis in our book More Than You Wanted to Know (Princeton Press, 2014) that disclosure laws do not deliver their anticipated benefits and thus could not easily pass quantified CBA. Second, it describes a previously unrecognized cost of disclosure, one arising from lawmakers’ collective action problem. With the proliferation of disclosures, each new mandate diminishes the attention people can give to other information, including all other disclosures. The problem for CBA is lawmakers’ inability to coordinate disclosure laws across different fields and jurisdictions. The article illustrates this regulatory failure by examining the rigorous cost-effectiveness analysis conducted by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in its recent mortgage disclosure regulation.

Ben-Shahar, Omri and Schneider, Carl E., The Futility of Cost Benefit Analysis in Financial Disclosure Regulation (January 20, 2014). University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 680; U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 395; U of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper No. 14-008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2412688 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2412688

SSRN Rankings

About SSRN

We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content.By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies. To learn more, visit our Cookies page.
This page was processed by aws-apollo5 in 0.219 seconds