Monthly Archives: July 2017

Let us call this the MATTHEW 17:20 INITIATIVE.

I’ll go ahead and get the ball rolling, and anyone else who wants to join in and spread the word about the MATTHEW 17:20 INITIATIVE , please do. Tuesdays and Fridays are the days in which The Church prays the Sorrowful Mysteries of the Most Holy Rosary, contemplating Our Blessed Lord’s Agony, Scourging, Crowning with Thorns, Carrying of The Cross and Crucifixion and Death. It seems appropriate that these two days could be set aside for full fasting, that is NO FOOD WHATSOEVER, and only water and/or zero calorie drinks (this allows coffee and tea).

The intention of the MATTHEW 17:20 INITIATIVE is for a full resolution to the Bergoglio situation. I phrase it like that, and not simply as “Bergoglio’s removal” because I realize that there are still many of you out there who are not morally certain, as I am, that Bergoglio is an Antipope. If I am right and Pope Benedict XVI is, in fact, still the one and only living pope, then the “removal of Bergoglio” could yield yet another Antipope.

At this point, many would say, “Well, Ann, how could it POSSIBLY get any worse?”

Very, very easily. Try on for size another Antipope with Bergoglio’s Satanic-Freemasonic-Sodomitical agenda, except… TWENTY YEARS YOUNGER.

So, the MATTHEW 17:20 INITIATIVE is for the full resolution of the Bergoglio situation.

But this kind is not cast out but by prayer and fasting.

Hoc autem genus non ejicitur nisi per orationem et jejunium.

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

“The enemy is like a woman, weak in face of opposition, but correspondingly strong when not opposed. In a quarrel with a man, it is natural for a woman to lose heart and run away when he faces up to her; on the other hand, if the man begins to be afraid and to give ground, her rage, vindictiveness and fury overflow and know no limit.”
St. Ignatius of Loyola

James Martin, S.J. is like a woman, weak in face of opposition, but correspondingly strong when not opposed.

Thomas Rosica is like a woman, weak in face of opposition, but correspondingly strong when not opposed.

Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia is like a woman, weak in face of opposition, but correspondingly strong when not opposed.

Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio is like a woman, weak in face of opposition, but correspondingly strong when not opposed.

Cardinal Blase Cupich is like a woman, weak in face of opposition, but correspondingly strong when not opposed.

Antipope Jorge Mario Bergoglio is like a woman, weak in face of opposition, but correspondingly strong when not opposed.

(I was reminded at Mass today on this the feast of St. Martha of domestic happiness, and this piece which I wrote for The Remnant Newspaper a while back. It was wildly popular when it was first published, with only a handful of women griping about it. Most women loved it, and for many it brought back happy memories of their own mothers and/or grandmothers, busily and lovingly taking care of the business of the household. We know St. Martha must have been a stupendous hostess, as today’s Gospel specifically states that Our Lord availed Himself of her (and her siblings’) hospitality FREQUENTLY. It also reminded me that I should watch one of my favorite movies tonight – “Marty”.)

I have had this piece in the back of my mind for some time, and have even run the title and general gist of it past a few people, all of whose eyes sparkled like the transporter beam of the Enterprise-A upon hearing it.

Long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away, I lived in a large, shared house built in the 1920s with a male friend. I had the master bedroom suite, and thus my own private bathroom, and everything was completely on the up-and-up. Fear not, gentle readers. I shall not be scandalizing you with tales of ribaldry – no “accompanying body-to-body” going on, to use one of FrancisChurch’s creepier turns of phrase. It was an excellent use of the property, and very frugal and affordable. And, yes, I certainly preferred to live with males, from both the security as well as a domestic tranquility standpoint.

In this particular case, I did, in fact, greatly admire and count as a treasured friend the male housemate, and no matter what great adventure I had been on in those heady days of my youth, when my learning curve was near-vertical, and every day seemed an adventure, it was always a pleasure to simply go home.

I have always been a bit of a “foodie”, and would often eat out, arriving home after the “rush hour” in the relatively large and well-equipped house kitchen was over for the evening. In fact, four out of five dentists surveyed would have guessed that my shelf in the refrigerator, packed with condiments, pickles, recycled glass jars of bacon drippings, and as many bottles of Corona Extra as would fit in the remaining void, was the “man shelf”. And they would have been wrong. But I digress.

My evening ritual before turning in for the night was, in order, to go into the kitchen, wash and dry any and all dishes and cookware used that day, including the coffee pot, lift the grates off of the gas stovetop and thoroughly clean and polish the stainless steel stovetop, clean the countertops, kitchen table, and stainless steel double basin sink, and finally replace the stove grates and then set upon the perfectly clean stove the small saucepan for my friend to heat his milk for the next morning’s coffee.

Bear in mind, rarely were any of the dishes dirtied by me, as I ate out more often than not. Further, I was almost never the first in the kitchen in the morning, and was not a ritual morning coffee drinker. I cleaned the kitchen and set out the next morning’s accouterment not for myself, but for my friend and housemate. I wanted him to start his day off not with a dirty kitchen, dishes stacked in the sink, and a grease-covered stove, the thought in the back of his mind, “Oh, I’m going to have to clean this kitchen after I get home from work today….”

No. I wanted to give him the smallest of gifts – a little help around the house. And God forgive me, that twenty minutes of quiet, nightly kitchen clean-up, in particular the polishing of the stove and setting out of the saucepan, was the best part of my day. If I were dishonest I would say that something liturgical or some formal prayer was the best part of my day, but it wasn’t. The silent, spontaneous prayer of thanksgiving that flowed out of my soul as I recalled that day’s events, and how happy I was to be where I was, surrounded by friends, recalling past adventures and making plans for future adventures, and praying for my friend and housemate and his intentions, as I scrubbed grease splatter off of the stove with Ajax grease cutting spray and paper towels – that was the best part of my day.

To this day, if asked to pinpoint my zenith of personal happiness, it has nothing to do with my personal accomplishments in business – my first cattle marketing school, the opening of my brokerage firm, or even my first six-figure month. Nor does it have to do with my reception into the Church, which was more a feeling of relief than anything else. If you ask me when I felt happy – truly, truly happy – it was when I was cleaning up for a man. So roll that up real tight in your Virginia Slim cigarette and smoke it, Betty Friedan. It’s almost as if there is some sort of hard-wiring given to us by God – factory-loaded software if you will – nudging us toward our gender-specific vocations that will make us truly happy.

One evening as I was doing the evening tidy-up, my friend and housemate, having eaten his dinner in his room, brought his dishes into the kitchen after I had started cleaning up. I happily reached out to take his dishes to wash, as I was already standing at the sink washing dishes. He said, “No, I’ll do it.” And I happily replied, “No, I’m happy to do it.” Which, as we just covered above, was the understatement of the evening. At this, he angrily handed me the dishes, growled contemptuously, “You’re SO annoying,” and walked out.

Baij claimed that the events of the life of St. Joseph were told to her by Our Lord Himself, and I found the book to be most informative and credible. In it, the Blessed Virgin is described as a meticulous housekeeper, not out of the slightest hint of personal pride, obviously, but out of pure love for Our Lord and St. Joseph.

Further, I was struck by the realization that Our Lord, who could have miraculously “cleaned” the house for His mother, or summoned angels to do it, let her do it. Why? Because He wanted her to be happy, and we can only be truly happy when what we do is motivated by love, and what we are doing is proper to our state in life. She loved St. Joseph because he was one of the finest and most admirable men who has ever lived, and he was her most chaste husband, and she was his wife ever virgin, and she loved Our Lord because He is God, and also her Son. She who was full of grace, and thus capable of such tremendous love, was, in keeping with her state in life of woman, wife and mother, made truly happy in taking care of and cleaning up after her “Boys”.

After thinking on this, I resolved that I would not stop doing my evening clean-up, and I did until the very end. I still remember the last night in that house, crying and crying as I polished the stove and set out the saucepan one last time.

Flash forward to today, wherein one of the main focuses of my writing and lecturing is Diabolical Narcissism. Diabolical Narcissism is the psycho-spiritual driver behind most of the cultural pathologies we see around us today. Diabolical Narcissism is broadly defined as when a human being, like the fallen angels, freely chooses to purge themselves of all charity, leaving them incapable of love or empathy, and capable of only the demonic emotional palate of anger, hatred, jealousy and fear. These people are incredibly dangerous to souls as they, like the demons, literally hunt other human beings, attempting to murder not their bodies, but their souls, out of pure spite.

One of the points of nexus I made early on in researching Diabolical Narcissism was that the subset of Marxism commonly called “feminism” is nothing less than the explicit attempt to turn women en masse into Diabolical Narcissists – whereas women have historically comprised less than 20% of the total of Diabolical Narcissists in western populations. Feminism demands that a woman be totally selfish, and beyond that hate men qua men, hate marriage, and even hate their own children to the point of demanding the state-protected, state-financed ability to premeditatedly murder them.

But where it all began was with the notion that any sort of work performed by a woman around the house was drudgery, a waste of time, an act of patriarchal oppression, even legalized slavery. Many women today in the post-Christian west are shockingly bad housekeepers, and not just because they are working outside the home. Many stay-at-home wives and mothers are content to live in squalor, even proud of the fact that they are “sticking it to the man”, boasting of their refusal to clean or inability to cook.

Are we surprised? As true charity is purged from every corner of our culture, replaced with a self-worshiping narcissistic humanism, is it any wonder that today’s women are simply incapable of understanding how it could possibly be that cleaning the kitchen, doing the laundry, or even that most primordial of caring acts, FEEDING another human being, could possibly make them happy, much less fulfill them as women on this mortal coil?

One of my favorite movies is 1954’s “Marty” starring Ernest Borgnine. A side plot in the film revolves around two widowed sisters, immigrants from Italy, living in the Bronx. One widowed sister has just moved in with her son, his new wife and their infant child. The mother is angry and frustrated with her daughter-in-law because the mother can no longer be the sole housekeeper. While her behavior toward her daughter-in-law is selfish and wrong, she gives a moving speech to her sister, also a widow but still living in her large family home and taking care of her remaining bachelor son, Marty, about the horror of growing old and not having anyone to take care of, not having anything to do.

To today’s women and girls, this sentiment is incomprehensible. How could a woman complain, much less fall into a depression, because she doesn’t have to clean up after anyone, doesn’t have to do anyone’s laundry, doesn’t have to cook? In other words, how can a woman not be overjoyed at having no one to love?

Goodness me, how I do hate feminism with a perfect hatred.

The lesson in all of this is to learn to be animated in our work by the love of God, because then all of our tasks and chores that we perform for others which the world considers menial drudgery at best and horrifically unpleasant at worst, including for perfect strangers, will yield that same happiness that comes from doing something for someone we love personally, be it a spouse, child, family member or friend. This is called, “sanctity”, and is what drove the centuries of religious who took care of the sick and dying, the destitute poor, and orphans. They saw Christ in every face. Even those chores that those of us who are single and live alone do for ourselves can be done for the love of God. And yes, to this day when I clean my own stove I still pray. But what I wouldn’t give for just one more night to clean up for my friend, because looking back at my life, that was the closest I ever came to being a normal woman, which is why I was, in retrospect, so happy.

And so, when I hear a woman, especially a woman with a family, complaining about housework using the standard diabolical narcissist feminist boilerplate that we can all recite, all I can think is, “Go clean up the kitchen, you stupid, stupid woman.”

In this episode we discuss a listener email about the Sacrament of Confession “being too easy” the way we described it in Episode 13, so we dive into the what it means to be sorry for one’s sins in an authentic sense. We also talk about shame: how the loss of it in the moral sense is devastating not just to individuals but society at large.

Feedback: send your questions, comments, or suggestions for growing in sorrow of sin to [email protected]

Timestamp Outline:
0:11 Intro remarks
1:29 Big Scary Steve’s email pointing up how confession is useless and even harmful in you’re not truly sorry
5:15 Sorrow for sin and firm purpose of amendment
8:23 Ann is a “Kennedy convert” to Catholicism. That scandal of Catholics trying to game the system and sinning without true remorse is repellent and keeps people from entering The Church.
10:20 The Lutheran heresy – all people are “piles of shit”, so don’t even bother trying to be anything other than a pile of shit. In fact, “sin boldly” to prove how much faith you have!
12:16 Antipope Bergoglio is functionally Lutheran
13:03 Shame is a gift and grace from God, and is the Fruit of the First Sorrowful Mystery of the Rosary – Christ’s agony in the Garden. We should all desire an increase in shame for our sins, both present and past.
17:03 Common examples: people who contracepted, got divorced, etc. Thank God that they now feel shame!
18:50 Do the words of “Pastor Brad” at Superfun Rockband church override that words of Christ Almighty? Really?
21:13 Nothing is more attractive to fallen man than someone who will ratify them in their sins
22:09 The gift of tears, understanding that Christ suffered and died for you personally and for your sins specifically
24:55 The Satanic nature of “FrancisNewMercy”: your sins aren’t sins, they don’t matter, God wants you to sin, following the Law is too difficult, so don’t bother. Antipope Bergoglio casts himself and “his new mercy” as greater than Christ’s mercy, which is rigid and might lead to personal sacrifice
30:18 “I’m the Pope, and I don’t believe any of that Catholic bullshit, so neither should you, and you were right not to all along.”
32:33 Shame as an essential component of a healthy culture/society
33:48 Shame and subsidiarity: personal, family, neighborhood levels should be a sufficient self-policing mechanism. Government or law enforcement should rarely be needed.
37:08 Shame still exists, but on a completely morally inverted plane. It is an act of violence to suppress a healthy conscience.
39:33 Effeminacy and the suppression of conscience, shame
43:10 Anarchy is bad – healthy self-policing is good.
44:08 WILDLY POLITICALLY INCORRECT CONTENT ALERT! Sodomy is exploding partly because boys who act like sissies are no longer “recalibrated” by their peers – rather they are celebrated and lauded as “heroes”. Boys acting faggy, i.e. like girls, should be shamed and punished corporeally if necessary.
49:39 Anecdote about drunk guy at Threshing Bee 25 years ago – healthy Christian self-policing.
52:53 NovusOrdoism/Bergoglianism is all-in on the agenda of eliminating shame for true sin
53:57 The phenomenon of the “non-apology apology”. Diabolical Narcissists, when they issue apologies, will invert the fault onto the victim – “I’m sorry if you were offended…”
58:38 Preview of next Podcast and general housekeeping

In this inaugural Barnhardt Financial Podcast, we address two main topics. First, we discuss the wisdom of the 7 year mortgage as a maximum loan term on a home, and walk through examples and consequences of the responsible use of debt. Next, we delve into the use of interest rates as literal weapons of mass destruction, the silent and extremely coercive “nuclear weapon” being held over every economy by the Deep State via central banks. Specifically, we look at the current threat of economic Armageddon being held over Italy as it is being coerced via threats of interest rate manipulation into importing and quartering the very islamic invasion force that was repelled at Lepanto in 1571 and Vienna in 1683.

In this episode we discuss the crisis resulting from a lack of fatherhood and how it can be observed in the Church and in Japan. In the Church: the anti-Papacy of Jorge Bergoglio is dividing and scattering the sheep as perennial Truths are being diminished, ignored, and even contradicted. In Japan: the crisis of narcissism manifested through immature males who only think of themselves is threatening to bring about extinction through a lack of procreation.

Latin word of the week: Munus. As it was used in this episode it means “an official office” (eg: The Papacy).

Timestamp Outline:
00:00 Introduction, 300 days of Dubia!
01:16 False premise alert! To expect a man who is not the pope to do things expected of a pope is irrational and leads to Protestantism or insanity.
06:09 Discussion of “Letter From an Absentee Father”
09:07 Discussion of Ratzinger’s lifetime of error and responsibility for the failed Vatican II council and the Bergoglian antipapacy
10:50 *Correction Ann misspoke and said “when Ratzinger was pope”. She meant, “when Ratzinger was fully exercising his office.”
14:49 False base premises and logical errors lead to errors in morals.
19:54 False premise of Bergoglio as “pope” very quickly leads to to the question, “Did Our Lord lie?”
21:26 Why the Divine Providence has allowed the Bergoglian antipapacy
24:38 Explanation of the only possible course of action based on a true premise with regards to removing Bergoglio
28:16 People are losing their faith due to scandal of Bergoglio, some descending into Diabolical Narcissism
32:02 Japanese culture committing auto-genocide by NOT having sex. Japan as historical lead indicator of human depravity.
38:24 Explosion of sex doll/robot technology led by Japan.
39:58 Eventually, the ultimate exotic sex act will be sex with another human being – but only for the purposes of hurting or killing the other person. Sex dolls/robots can not be hurt.
41:59 Discussion of “relationships” between demons and between the damned.
50:15 The Novus Ordo is valid. Discussion of supplied jurisdiction.
55:38 SuperNerd clarifies how the Novus Ordo tends to reduce a person’s disposition and ability to receive the infinite grace of the Sacraments
57:35 Should one receive Holy Communion at a Novus Ordo Mass, or just make a Spiritual Communion?
60:34 The historical and contemporary importance of Spiritual Communion
65:10 Wrap-up, discussion of possible “Financial Friday” podcasts

Subscribe: You can subscribe for free to the podcast through any of the podcast links and services below:

In this episode we discuss the economic scam that is “Obamacare” and how it necessarily leads to concentration of government spending and power — and that now Jorge Bergoglio is calling for a “United States of Europe” to supplant the sovereignty of independent nations (in contrast to Catholic social teaching which favors subsidiary and smaller political entities). We also talk about a recent news article involving Cardinal Mueller which further demonstrates a recurring theme: “they” — including “Call me Jorge” — simply don’t believe the Truths of the Catholic Faith.

Quote to ponder: “The Economy of Grace can be compared to the power grid, and we’re dealing with constant rolling brown-outs and black-outs these days.”

Feedback: You can email Ann and her co-host at [email protected] with your questions, comments, non-bloody ideas for rebooting our republic, etc.

Timestamp outline:

1:00 President Donald Trump: WWE Hall of Fame member
2:55 Something nice about the Trump Administration: Melania Trump puts the dignity of a Lady back in the position of First Lady
5:51 Does the Vatican need to be exorcised and reconsecrated?
8:44 Geological events as a precipitator for the Muslim Invasion Force
15:00 Divine Justice as a solution to an otherwise unsolvable problem
16:06 The historical precedent of the sufferings of a few gaining mercy for the many: the martyrdom of the French Carmelites to end the Reign of Terror
19:30 Congressional Republicans: Obamacare cannot be undone now
24:05 Medical costs should be falling with technology
27:00 Is it health care or money laundering?
31:33 Centralization of resources: what could possibly go wrong?
32:13 Explosion of mental illness
38:00 Demonic activity is magnified by pornography
40:45 Bergoglio calls for a centralize, federal Europe
45:45 Tribalism versus the Truth
49:25 A centralized, Federal Europe contradicts the Christian Principle of Subsidiary
54:00 Sacrilege and Hubris: Cardinal Mueller pulled off the altar during Mass to have a conversation with Bergoglio
1:05:00 Effeminacy and driving to the Traditional Mass: have you considered moving?
1:14:30 Masses, prayers for the dead, and the Economy of Grace discussed
1:19:58 An idea for localized Catholic action: pray the Leonine Prayers as a group after Mass

Subscribe: You can subscribe for free to the podcast through any of the podcast links and services below:

Know also this, that, in the last days, shall come dangerous times. Men shall be lovers of themselves, covetous, haughty, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, wicked, Without affection, without peace, slanderers, incontinent, unmerciful, without kindness, Traitors, stubborn, puffed up, and lovers of pleasures more than of God: Having an appearance indeed of godliness, but denying the power thereof. Now these avoid.

2 Timothy 3: 1-5

In the first installment of this series, we isolated what effeminacy is NOT, namely femininity or faggotry. So, what is effeminacy? St. Thomas Aquinas uses the words “softness” and “delicacy” as his main descriptors. By “delicacy”, Thomas means a man who cannot endure any toil or anything that diminishes pleasure. In our contemporary parlance the word “wimp” might be a more illuminating choice. If we look at St. Thomas’ words in the Summa in Article 1 of Question 138 of the Second Part of the Second Part, we see that at the core of the vice of effeminacy is a pathological aversion to a lack of pleasure, that is to say, an aversion to anything even remotely unpleasant, most especially any sort of exertion (work) or voluntary suffering.

Check those last two words: voluntary suffering. Do you see why effeminacy is pretty much the existential antipode to Christianity? Do you see why the weapon satan has used in this the “Battle of the Pelennor Fields” against the Church has been an infiltration of effeminate men who have spent the last 50 years preaching a “new gospel” wherein the cardinal false virtue is EFFEMINACY? Effeminacy simply cannot be reconciled to Christianity. It is contrary to the very foundations and core of the Truth of Christ. To wit:

Matthew 16: 24-25 Then Jesus said to His disciples: If any man will come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me. For he that will save his life, shall lose it: and he that shall lose his life for My sake, shall find it.

Matthew 5: 5 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.

Matthew 5: 10-12 Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for My sake: Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. For so they persecuted the prophets that were before you.

John 15: 18-20 If the world hate you, know ye, that it hath hated Me before you. If you had been of the world, the world would love its own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember My word that I said to you: The servant is not greater than his master. If they have persecuted Me, they will also persecute you.

Matthew 24: 9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall put you to death: and you shall be hated by all nations for My Name’ s sake.

2 Timothy 3: 12 And all that will live godly in Christ Jesus, shall suffer persecution.

Let me now put up a list of bullet points of how effeminacy manifests, and we will then go down the list in future installments discussing in depth each example and how they are manifesting in today’s post-Christian, Modernist world and in AntipopeBergoglioNewWorldOrderChurchOfMan.

~ Effeminacy is the vice of softness that is opposed to perseverance. ~

But let’s expand on that so that you can understand what exactly that means.

First two things that effeminacy is NOT:

Effeminacy is NOT femininity. In modern parlance, “effeminate” is often used to mean “feminine”. This is flatly incorrect. Femininity, the quality of being female, is a good thing. We know this from the great “Hubba-hubba!” of Adam when he first saw Eve in Genesis 2. Also, from Our Lady, who is the pinnacle of femininity.

But femininity is the exclusive asset and domain of females, and men who claim it and manifest it are deluded, mentally ill perverts. Like Bruce Jenner. Further, since effeminacy is a vice, it can be manifested by both men and women.

Oh yeah. Effeminacy in women is just as wrong as in men, the difference being that the sight of effeminacy in men is so much more disturbing that it tends to be magnified in our minds. It is more disturbing because it is more contrary to masculine nature. The best example in reverse that I can think of is drunkenness. Which is a more jarring sight: a man that is s___faced drunk, or a woman in that condition? Drunkenness in a woman is more jarring to see because it is more contrary to her feminine nature, but drunkenness is equally wrong in both men and women. Also the use of coarse language. (Cough cough, I resemble that remark.)

Effeminacy is also NOT a synonym for faggotry. If we were to draw a Venn Diagram of effeminate males in a given population compared to sodomitically-oriented males, which for brevity’s sake we will henceforth refer to as “fags”, in that population, first, the effeminate domain circle would be at least 50x larger than the fag circle, because in this post-Christian culture there are way, way, way more effeminate heterosexual (straight) men than dudes who lust after other dudes. (I know you don’t buy this right now, but stay with me.)

Second, we would see that the Fag circle would NOT exist entirely inside the Effeminacy circle. This is a very important point, especially in terms of history, tyrannical governments, wars and genocides. It ain’t no coinkydink that the biggest murdering, genociding, evil tyrant bastards in history have been enthusiasts for the butt___ks.

Y’all have read “The Pink Swastika” and know that the core founders of the Nazi Party, including Herr Hitler himself, were all raging sodomites, right? But here is the distinction: they were butch and not effeminate. In fact, the homosexuals that ended up being purged in the Night of the Long Knives or sent to concentration camps were the feminine, swishy, flaming fags. The Nazis were not “soft”, effeminate men and were thus extremely aggressive and effective at implementing their satanic agenda. The same could be said for the fags that have been running the islamic political system since day one. Likewise for the Samurai culture and Sparta. History hath shewn time and time again that the most dangerous fags to civilization on a macro level are the fags that present as masculine and are, in fact, NOT effeminate.

In the next installment, we will discuss what effeminacy is, how St. Thomas Aquinas defines it, what its opposite is, and we will begin to discuss how effeminacy manifests itself in our culture today, both in men and women.

When my email box started filling up yesterday with the reportage of the sodomite orgy that the police broke up in the Vatican, I was reminded that many of you are not checking Canon212.com regularly. Canon212.com is the Drudge Report equivalent news aggregator of Traditional Catholicism. The editor, Frank Walker, does a fantastic job of finding straight journalism and reportage, editorial content, and interesting blogs. He generally updates the site twice per day. The reason I mention this is because the Vatican gay orgy news broke a week ago. I made a post on it titled, “When I Say the Vatican Is A Bathhouse, I’m Not Exaggerating” on June 28th. It is just that it took the real Drudge a week to pick up the story and publicize it to the mainstream. As I write this, it is a top headline with three links on Drudge.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. The past two years or so have been EXTREMELY illuminating on this topic. The sodomites are EVERYWHERE in the Vatican, transcending all “right-left”, “liberal-Traditional” and all other categories and spectra. In fact, many of the most diabolical and sacriligious sex perverts inside the Vatican, of which actual, real, practicing Satanists are a subset, hide not only amongst leftist groups such as the Jesuits, but so many are hiding among what are branded as “conservative” groups such as Opus Dei and the Legionaries of Christ, which are actually two of the most powerful and wealthy organized crime syndicates today. There are also, as we have discussed, many sodomites amongst people, both clerics and laity, attached to the Traditional Rites, both the Roman Rite and the Byzantine Rite in Rome. Remember folks, for sodomites, the top priority is the sodomy. For them, sourcing sex partners/victims and the code of silence, or “omertà” which perpetuates the paradigm, trumps everything, including politics, and certainly any liturgical paradigms or preferences. This is why “tribalism” is so spectacularly dangerous.

Which brings us to the sad truth. I have very high-level and unimpeachable sources in Rome who have recently said that among the handful of remaining Catholics in the Curia, including senior-level officials (that category could literally be counted on one hand – do the math), there is now a resignation to the fact that the infiltration of sodomites and Freemasons (that Venn Diagram has a massive overlap) is so severe that it is not humanly possible to remove the infiltration. This can ONLY be solved by supernatural means, which all understand means a Sodom and Gomorrah type event, except on a much, much larger scale. Massive destruction, with many, many people dying on a level never before seen by mankind, just as the Blessed Mother has warned so many times, particularly over the past century.

Think about it. If there are literally just a handful men in the Vatican, which is a massive, bloated, corrupt bureaucracy, that are NOT Freemasons and/or sodomites, that implies that in order to purge the infestation well north of NINETY PERCENT of the people in the Vatican would have to be permanently expelled. And what of the entire college of bishops? FAR North of 90% of them would need to be fired and purged. And what of the priesthood? Same. And what of the staffs in the chanceries all over the world? Same.

FACE IT: NO ONE, AND I MEAN NO ONE, IS COMING TO SAVE THE DAY. NOT CARDINAL BURKE, NOT CARDINAL SARAH, NOT BISHOP SCHNEIDER.

ONLY SUPERNATURAL INTERVENTION WILL BE EFFECTIVE. PERIOD.

Bottom line, start praying for the Blessed Virgin to hold back the arm of her Son no longer. Let the supernatural purge and cleanse come, even if that means that most of us will die in it. This spitting in the face of Christ and the raping of His Holy Church must stop. We’ve heard enough about the rights of men. Let us now return our focus to what we should have been focused on all along: the rights of God – to paraphrase Pope Leo XIII.

In the mean time, we must focus on INDIVIDUAL SOULS. Explain what is happening. Tell people the truth – the blunt, clear, unvarnished truth – no matter how “ugly” it may be. First and foremost we should be explaining to people that Bergoglio is an Antipope, and that Pope Benedict XVI remains the one and only living pope. That true premise is essential to building the rest of the case on a valid logical truth table. The truth of Catholicism falls flat on its face if a man who is not the pope is called the pope, which then necessitates the secondary false premise that the papacy is irrelevant, and that Christ’s promises to Peter, and thus to all of mankind, were either lies, or had an unknowable expiration date. BLASPHEMY!

Remember, nothing is as “ugly” as Christ Crucified, and Christ Crucified is the most beautiful thing that has ever happened because it is Christ’s total outpouring of Love for man. Good luck explaining Christianity without ever mentioning Our Blessed Lord’s Passion and Death.

What I would personally like to see, and what I think could go a LONG WAY in helping people to understand what is going on, and thus help people either revert or convert to the One True Church, are hidden camera stings such as what James O’Keefe at Project Veritas and David Daleiden at the Center For Medical Progress have been doing. I would hasten to mention that taking any sort of recording device into a confessional under any circumstance and for any motive is grave sin and can never, ever, ever be done. It would be aping the Sacrament, and that is grave sin, no matter your motive. However, I would like to see hidden cameras taken into the Vatican and have the real words and deeds of these wretches splashed all over the internet. I would like to see hidden camera tapes of sacriligious sexual propositions publicized. Good grief, it wouldn’t be difficult. The Vatican is a de facto BATHHOUSE. They aren’t playing checkers and polishing the silver in there all day. The same with local chanceries and even seminaries. Let’s get video out of seminarians sitting on the Bishop’s or the seminary rector’s lap. Let’s get hidden camera footage of clerics and laymen flirting in the sacristy.