Large scale migration tasks require automated quality assurance to ensure migration was successful, e.g. PDF to PDF/A, or DOC to PDF/A migration. Quality Assurance could be performed by comparing relevant properties from the before and after documents, to ensure these are unchanged. Appropriate properties need to be identified for such comparisons, probably on a "per format" basis. Such properties should be quantifiable, although obvious candidates may not always be suitable, e.g. word counts may differ due to migration tools adding headers/footers (indicating file is a migration, copyright statement, etc.)

Any other parties who are also interested in applying Issue Solutions to their Datasets. Identify the party with a link to their contact page on the SCAPE Sharepoint site, as well as identifying their institution in brackets. Eg:Schlarb Sven(ONB)

Details of the institutional context to the Issue. (May be expanded at a later date)

Lessons Learned

Notes on Lessons Learned from tackling this Issue that might be useful to inform the development of Future Additional Best Practices, Task 8 (SCAPE TU.WP.1 Dissemination and Promotion of Best Practices)

Training Needs

Is there a need for providing training for the Solution(s) associated with this Issue? Notes added here will provide guidance to the SCAPE TU.WP.3 Sustainability WP.

Datasets

Reference to the appropriate Collection page, by hyperlink. Note that all IssuesMUSTbe linked to at least one Dataset!

Evaluation

Describe the success criteria for solving this issue - what are you able to do? - what does the world look like?

Automatic measures

What automated measures would you like the solution to give to evaluate the solution for this specific issue? which measures are important?If possible specify very specific measures and your goal - e.g. * process 50 documents per second * handle 80Gb files without crashing * identify 99.5% of the content correctly

Manual assessment

Apart from automated measures that you would like to get do you foresee any necessary manual assessment to evaluate the solution of this issue?If possible specify measures and your goal - e.g. * Solution installable with basic linux system administration skills * User interface understandable by non developer curators