Economy Profile 2016 Kuwait

Transcription

1 Economy Profile 2016

2 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC Telephone: ; Internet: Some rights reserved This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 33.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO). Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution Please cite the work as follows: World Bank Doing Business 2016: Measuring Regulatory Quality and Efficiency. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. DOI: / License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO Translations If you create a translation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World Bank translation. The World Bank shall not be liable for any content or error in this translation. Adaptations If you create an adaptation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This is an adaptation of an original work by The World Bank. Views and opinions expressed in the adaptation are the sole responsibility of the author or authors of the adaptation and are not endorsed by The World Bank. Third-party content The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content contained within the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of any third-partyowned individual component or part contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of those third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. If you wish to re-use a component of the work, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that re-use and to obtain permission from the copyright owner. Examples of components can include, but are not limited to, tables, figures or images. All queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to the Publishing and Knowledge Division, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: ; ISBN (paper): ISBN (electronic): DOI: / ISSN: Cover design: Corporate Visions, Inc.

4 4 INTRODUCTION Doing Business sheds light on how easy or difficult it is for a local entrepreneur to open and run a small to medium-size business when complying with relevant regulations. It measures and tracks changes in regulations affecting 11 areas in the life cycle of a business: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts, resolving insolvency and labor market regulation. Doing Business 2016 presents the data for the labor market regulation indicators in an annex. The report does not present rankings of economies on labor market regulation indicators or include the topic in the aggregate distance to frontier score or ranking on the ease of doing business. In a series of annual reports Doing Business presents quantitative indicators on business regulations and the protection of property rights that can be compared across 189 economies, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, over time. The data set covers 47 economies in Sub- Saharan Africa, 32 in Latin America and the Caribbean, 25 in East Asia and the Pacific, 25 in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, 20 in the Middle East and North Africa and 8 in South Asia, as well as 32 OECD high-income economies. The indicators are used to analyze economic outcomes and identify what reforms have worked, where and why. This economy profile presents the Doing Business indicators for. To allow useful comparison, it also provides data for other selected economies (comparator economies) for each indicator. The data in this report are current as of June 1, 2015 (except for the paying taxes indicators, which cover the period January December 2014). The Doing Business methodology has limitations. Other areas important to business such as an economy s proximity to large markets, the quality of its infrastructure services (other than those related to trading across borders and getting electricity), the security of property from theft and looting, the transparency of government procurement, macroeconomic conditions or the underlying strength of institutions are not directly studied by Doing Business. The indicators refer to a specific type of business, generally a local limited liability company operating in the largest business city. Because standard assumptions are used in the data collection, comparisons and benchmarks are valid across economies. The data not only highlight the extent of obstacles to doing business; they also help identify the source of those obstacles, supporting policy makers in designing regulatory reform. More information is available in the full report. Doing Business 2016 presents the indicators, analyzes their relationship with economic outcomes and presents business regulatory reforms. The data, along with information on ordering Doing Business 2016, are available on the Doing Business website at

5 5 CHANGES IN DOING BUSINESS 2016 As part of a two-year update in methodology, Doing Business 2016 expands the focus of five indicator sets (dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, enforcing contracts and labor market regulation), substantially revises the methodology for one indicator set (trading across borders) and implements small updates to the methodology for another (protecting minority investors). The indicators on dealing with construction permits now include an index of the quality of building regulation and its implementation. The getting electricity indicators now include a measure of the price of electricity consumption and an index of the reliability of electricity supply and transparency of tariffs. Starting this year, the registering property indicators include an index of the quality of the land administration system in each economy in addition to the indicators on the number of procedures and the time and cost to transfer property. And for enforcing contracts an index of the quality and efficiency of judicial processes has been added while the indicator on the number of procedures to enforce a contract has been dropped. The scope of the labor market regulation indicator set has also been expanded, to include more areas capturing aspects of job quality. The labor market regulation indicators continue to be excluded from the aggregate distance to frontier score and ranking on the ease of doing business. The case study underlying the trading across borders indicators has been changed to increase its relevance. For each economy the export product and partner are now determined on the basis of the economy s comparative advantage, the import product is auto parts, and the import partner is selected on the basis of which economy has the highest trade value in that product. The indicators continue to measure the time and cost to export and import. Beyond these changes there is one other update in methodology, for the protecting minority investors indicators. A few points for the extent of shareholder governance index have been fine-tuned, and the index now also measures aspects of the regulations applicable to limited companies rather than privately held joint stock companies. For more details on the changes, see the What is changing in Doing Business? chapter starting on page 27 of the Doing Business 2016 report. For more details on the data and methodology, please see the Data Notes chapter starting on page 119 of the Doing Business 2016 report. For more details on the distance to frontier metric, please see the Distance to frontier and ease of doing business ranking chapter in this profile.

6 6 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT For policy makers trying to improve their economy s regulatory environment for business, a good place to start is to find out how it compares with the regulatory environment in other economies. Doing Business provides an aggregate ranking on the ease of doing business based on indicator sets that measure and benchmark regulations applying to domestic small to medium-size businesses through their life cycle. Economies are ranked from 1 to 189 by the ease of doing business ranking. Doing Business presents results for 2 aggregate measures: the distance to frontier score and the ease of doing business ranking. The ranking of economies is determined by sorting the aggregate distance to frontier scores, rounded to two decimals. An economy s distance to frontier score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst performance and 100 the frontier. (See the chapter on the distance to frontier and ease of doing business). The ease of doing business ranking compares economies with one another; the distance to frontier score benchmarks economies with respect to regulatory best practice, showing the absolute distance to the best performance on each Doing Business indicator. When compared across years, the distance to frontier score shows how much the regulatory environment for local entrepreneurs in an economy has changed over time in absolute terms, while the ease of doing business ranking can show only how much the regulatory environment has changed relative to that in other economies. ECONOMY OVERVIEW Region: Middle East & North Africa Income category: High income Population: 3,479,371 GNI per capita (US$): 43,103 DB2016 rank: 101 DB2015 rank: 100* Change in rank: -1 DB 2016 DTF: DB 2015 DTF: Change in DTF: 0.4 * DB2015 ranking shown is not last year s published ranking but a comparable ranking for DB2015 that captures the effects of such factors as data revisions and the changes in methodology. See the data notes starting on page 119 of the Doing Business 2016 report for sources and definitions. The 10 topics included in the ranking in Doing Business 2016: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The labor market regulation indicators are not included in this year s aggregate ease of doing business ranking, but the data are presented in the economy profile.

7 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Figure 1.1 Where economies stand in the global ranking on the ease of doing business Source: Doing Business database.

8 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT For policy makers, knowing where their economy stands in the aggregate ranking on the ease of doing business is useful. Also useful is to know how it ranks relative to comparator economies and relative to the regional average (figure 1.2). The economy s rankings (figure 1.3) and distance to frontier scores (figure 1.4) on the topics included in the ease of doing business ranking provide another perspective. Figure 1.2 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of doing business Note: The rankings are benchmarked to June 2015 and based on the average of each economy s distance to frontier (DTF) scores for the 10 topics included in this year s aggregate ranking. The distance to frontier score benchmarks economies with respect to regulatory practice, showing the absolute distance to the best performance in each Doing Business indicator. An economy s distance to frontier score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst performance and 100 the frontier. For the economies for which the data cover 2 cities, scores are a population-weighted average for the 2 cities. Source: Doing Business database.

9 9 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Figure 1.3 Rankings on Doing Business topics - (Scale: Rank 189 center, Rank 1 outer edge) Figure 1.4 Distance to frontier scores on Doing Business topics - (Scale: Score 0 center, Score 100 outer edge) Source: Doing Business database. Note: The rankings are benchmarked to June 2015 and based on the average of each economy s distance to frontier (DTF) scores for the 10 topics included in this year s aggregate ranking. The distance to frontier score benchmarks economies with respect to regulatory practice, showing the absolute distance to the best performance in each Doing Business indicator. An economy s distance to frontier score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst performance and 100 the frontier. For the economies for which the data cover 2 cities, scores are a population-weighted average for the 2 cities.

10 10 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Just as the overall ranking on the ease of doing business tells only part of the story, so do changes in that ranking. Yearly movements in rankings can provide some indication of changes in an economy s regulatory environment for firms, but they are always relative. Moreover, year-to-year changes in the overall rankings do not reflect how the business regulatory environment in an economy has changed over time or how it has changed in different areas. To aid in assessing such changes, Doing Business introduced the distance to frontier score. This measure shows how far on average an economy is from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator. Comparing the measure for an economy at 2 points in time allows users to assess how much the economy s regulatory environment as measured by Doing Business has changed over time how far it has moved toward (or away from) the most efficient practices and strongest regulations in areas covered by Doing Business (figure 1.5). Figure 1.5 How far has come in the areas measured by Doing Business? Note: The distance to frontier score shows how far on average an economy is from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator. Starting a business is comparable to Getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes and resolving insolvency had methodology changes in 2014 and thus are only comparable to Dealing with construction permits, registering property, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and getting electricity had methodology changes in 2015 and thus are only comparable to The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the best performance (the frontier). See the data notes starting on page 119 of the Doing Business 2016 report for more details on the distance to frontier score. Source: Doing Business database.

11 DB2016 DB2015 Bahrain DB2016 Iraq DB2016 Jordan DB2016 Oman DB2016 Qatar DB2016 Saudi Arabia DB2016 Best performer globally DB2016 Doing Business THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT The absolute values of the indicators tell another part of the story (table 1.1). The indicators, on their own or in comparison with the indicators of a good practice economy or those of comparator economies in the region, may reveal bottlenecks reflected in large numbers of procedures, long delays or high costs. Or they may reveal unexpected strengths in an area of business regulation such as a regulatory process that can be completed with a small number of procedures in a few days and at a low cost. Comparison of the economy s indicators today with those in the previous year may show where substantial bottlenecks persist and where they are diminishing. Table 1.1 Summary of Doing Business indicators for Indicator Starting a Business (rank) New Zealand (1) Starting a Business (DTF Score) New Zealand (99.96) Procedures (number) New Zealand (1.00)* Time (days) New Zealand (0.50) Cost (% of income per capita) Slovenia (0.00) Paid-in min. capital (% of income per capita) Economies (0.00)* Dealing with Construction Permits (rank) Singapore (1) Dealing with Construction Permits (DTF Score) Singapore (92.97) Procedures (number) Economies (7.00)*

15 DB2016 DB2015 Bahrain DB2016 Iraq DB2016 Jordan DB2016 Oman DB2016 Qatar DB2016 Saudi Arabia DB2016 Best performer globally DB2016 Doing Business Indicator (rank) Enforcing Contracts (DTF Score) Singapore (84.91) Time (days) Singapore (150.00) Cost (% of claim) Iceland (9.00) Quality of judicial processes index (0-18) Economies (15.50)* Resolving Insolvency (rank) Finland (1) Resolving Insolvency (DTF Score) Finland (93.81) Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) Japan (92.90) Time (years) no practice no practice Ireland (0.40) Cost (% of estate) no practice no practice Norway (1.00) Outcome (0 as piecemeal sale and 1 as going concern) no practice no practice Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) Economies (15.00)* Source: Doing Business database. Note: DB2015 rankings shown are not last year s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2015 that capture the effects of such factors as data revisions and changes to the methodology. The global best performer on time for paying taxes is defined as the lowest time recorded among all economies in the DB2016 sample that levy the 3 major taxes: profit tax, labor taxes and mandatory contributions, and VAT or sales tax. If an economy has no laws or regulations covering a specific area for example, insolvency it receives a no practice mark. Similarly, an economy receives a no practice mark if regulation exists but is never used in practice or if a competing regulation prohibits such practice. Either way, a no practice mark puts the economy at the bottom of the ranking on the relevant indicator. * Two or more economies share the top ranking on this indicator. A number shown in place of an economy s name

16 16 indicates the number of economies that share the top ranking on the indicator. For a list of these economies, see the Doing Business website (

17 17 STARTING A BUSINESS Formal registration of companies has many immediate benefits for the companies and for business owners and employees. Legal entities can outlive their founders. Resources are pooled as several shareholders join forces to start a company. Formally registered companies have access to services and institutions from courts to banks as well as to new markets. And their employees can benefit from protections provided by the law. An additional benefit comes with limited liability companies. These limit the financial liability of company owners to their investments, so personal assets of the owners are not put at risk. Where governments make registration easy, more entrepreneurs start businesses in the formal sector, creating more good jobs and generating more revenue for the government. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business records all procedures officially required, or commonly done in practice, for an entrepreneur to start up and formally operate an industrial or commercial business, as well as the time and cost to complete these procedures and the paidin minimum capital requirement. These procedures include obtaining all necessary licenses and permits and completing any required notifications, verifications or inscriptions for the company and employees with relevant authorities. The ranking of economies on the ease of starting a business is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores for starting a business. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for each of the component indicators. To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about the business and the procedures are used. It is assumed that any required information is readily available and that the entrepreneur will pay no bribes. Assumptions about the business: Is a limited liability company (or its legal equivalent), located in the largest business city and is 100% domestically owned 1 with five owners, none of whom is a legal entity. Has at least 10 and up to 50 employees, all of them domestic nationals. Performs general commercial or industrial activities. WHAT THE STARTING A BUSINESS INDICATORS MEASURE Procedures to legally start and operate a company (number) Preregistration (for example, name verification or reservation, notarization) Registration in the economy s largest business city 1 Postregistration (for example, social security registration, company seal) Time required to complete each procedure (calendar days) Does not include time spent gathering information Each procedure starts on a separate day (2 procedures cannot start on the same day). Procedures that can be fully completed online are recorded as ½ day. Procedure completed once final document is received No prior contact with officials Cost required to complete each procedure (% of income per capita) Official costs only, no bribes No professional fees unless services required by law or commonly used in practice Paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) Deposited in a bank or with a notary before registration (or within 3 months) Has a start-up capital of 10 times income per capita and a turnover of at least 100 times income per capita. Has a company deed 10 pages long. Does not qualify for any special benefits. Leases the commercial plant or offices and is not a proprietor of real estate. 1 For 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city.

18 18 STARTING A BUSINESS Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to start a business in? According to data collected by Doing Business, starting a business there requires procedures, takes days, costs 2.30% of income per capita and requires paid-in minimum capital of 8.20% of income per capita (figure 2.1). Most indicator sets refer to a case scenario in the largest business city of an economy, except for 11 economies for which the data are a population-weighted average of the 2 largest business cities. See the chapter on distance to frontier and ease of doing business ranking at the end of this profile for more details. Figure 2.1 What it takes to start a business in Paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita): 8.20 Source: Doing Business database. Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation. For more information on the methodology of the starting a business indicators, see the Doing Business website ( For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter.

19 19 STARTING A BUSINESS Globally, stands at 148 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of starting a business (figure 2.2). The rankings for comparator economies and the regional average ranking provide other useful information for assessing how easy it is for an entrepreneur in to start a business. Figure 2.2 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of starting a business Source: Doing Business database.

20 20 STARTING A BUSINESS Economies around the world have taken steps making it easier to start a business streamlining procedures by setting up a one-stop shop, making procedures simpler or faster by introducing technology and reducing or eliminating minimum capital requirements. Many have undertaken business registration reforms in stages and they often are part of a larger regulatory reform program. Among the benefits have been greater firm satisfaction and savings and more registered businesses, financial resources and job opportunities. What business registration reforms has Doing Business recorded in (table 2.1)? Table 2.1 How has made starting a business easier or not? By Doing Business report year from DB2011 to DB2016 DB year DB2014 DB2015 Reform made starting a business more difficult by increasing the minimum capital requirement. made starting a business more difficult by increasing the commercial license fee. DB2016 made starting a business easier by reducing the minimum capital requirement. Source: Doing Business database. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2005), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at

21 21 STARTING A BUSINESS What are the details? Underlying the indicators shown in this chapter for is a set of specific procedures the bureaucratic and legal steps that an entrepreneur must complete to incorporate and register a new firm. These are identified by Doing Business through collaboration with relevant local professionals and the study of laws, regulations and publicly available information on business entry in that economy. Following is a detailed summary of those procedures, along with the associated time and cost. These procedures are those that apply to a company matching the standard assumptions (the standardized company ) used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see the section in this chapter on what the indicators measure). STANDARDIZED COMPANY Legal form: Limited Liability company (WLL) Paid-in minimum capital requirement: KWD 1,000 City: City Start-up Capital: 10 times GNI per capita Table 2.2 Summary of time, cost and procedures for starting a business in No. Procedure Register at the Department of Companies of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry (MOCI) Time to complete Cost to complete 1 To register, the entrepreneur must submit a completed standard application form to the Department of Companies of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry (MOCI), accompanied by the following documents: 1. Copy of the entrepreneur's identity card (ID) 2. Certificate issued by the Social Security Authority attesting that the i partners are not civil servants 3. Lease contract, a receipt of rent payment, and a certificate from the Public Authority for Civil Information (PACI) confirming that the premises are registered with PACI The completed application must include the names of the founding partners and their respective shares; the capital, scope and objective of the company; and the name of the manager. Once the application is approved, it is stamped and signed by the Department of Companies, and allocated a reference number. The MOCI electronically sends an inspection request to the Municipality to proceed with the inspection of the company premises at the relevant point of incorporation process. The MOCI also sends a request to the Ministry of Interior to run background checks verifying that the founding partners do not have a criminal record. 1 day no charge Agency: Department of Companies

22 22 No. Procedure Reserve a unique company name Time to complete Cost to complete 2 The entrepreneur submits a company name reservation application to the Commercial Registry. The Commercial Registry searches the computer database to ensure that the proposed company name(s) does not already exist or resemble other reserved names. The Commercial Registry has certain guidelines to follow with respect to the company name selection, such as: the chosen name must not be in breach of "public morals." Once approved, the Commercial Registry issues a letter confirming the proposed name and reserves it for 3 months. 1 day no charge Agency: Commercial Register Retrieve the letter addressed to the bank from the Department of Companies 3 The entrepreneur must return to the Department of Companies to retrieve the necessary letter addressed to the commercial bank of choice where the paid-in capital of the company will be deposited. The Department of Companies may further issue additional letters addressed to different government authorities depending on the scope and activity of the company in order to obtain their approval of the company formation. For example, for restaurants and food establishments, a letter addressed to the Ministry of Health is issued; for the oil industry, a letter addressed to the Ministry of Oil and Energy is issued, and so forth. 1 day no charge Agency: Department of Companies Deposit the capital at the bank and obtain proof thereof 4 In deference to the Department of Companies' letter, the bank open an account in the name of the company with the term "under formation" annexed to the account. The deposited capital remains frozen until the bank receives the notarized deed of incorporation and the commercial license of the company, following which the term "under formation" is removed and the account is activated. The bank issues a deposit certificate in the name of the company addressed to the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, detailing the amount deposited by each partner against his/her share in the company. 1 day no charge Agency: Bank Receive inspection of the company premises by the Municipality 5 Once the municipality receives the request for inspection of the company premises from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, it contacts the entrepreneur to schedule an inspection date in order to verify that the premises comply with municipal health and safety regulations. This includes an inspection by the Fire Department to check 5 days on average no charge

23 23 No. Procedure for compliance with fire regulations. If the company premises successfully pass inspection, the municipality issues a certificate of no objection in the name of the company, allowing the use of the indicated premises as the company location. This process usually takes 5 to 14 days. Time to complete Cost to complete Agency: Municipality Obtain the approval of the memorandum of association from the Department of Companies 6 The entrepreneur proceeds to the Department of Companies to submit the draft memorandum of association. If the entrepreneur does not use the standard form of the memorandum of association, the amendments or additions to the standard memorandum must be accepted by the MOCI before it approves the company incorporation. Once the final draft is signed, the Department of Companies issues a letter addressed to the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) requesting the authentication of the company incorporation, accompanied by the draft memorandum of association. 1 day no charge Agency: Department of Companies Notarize the memorandum of association before a public notary 7 The entrepreneur submits the draft memorandum of association along with Department of Companies' letter and the bank capital deposit certificate to the Notary Public Department at the Ministry of Justice. The officer verifies that the required documents are complete and schedules an appointment for signing before the notary public at the Company Formation Department of the Ministry of Justice, during which the memorandum of association is signed by the founding partners and notarized on the set date in 3 originals: one for the company, one for the Ministry of Justice, and one to be field with the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. 1 day KWD 2 for the first page of the Memorandum and KWD 1 for every subsequent page Agency: Notary Register with the Commercial Registry 8 The entrepreneur files a signed and notarized copy of the memorandum of association at the Department of Companies of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. A copy thereof is then submitted to the Commercial Registry and a certificate of registration is obtained. The certificate of registration includes the company's full name and commercial registration number. 1 day KWD 7 Agency: Commercial Registry

24 24 No. Procedure Obtain the commercial license from the Department of Companies Time to complete Cost to complete 9 Once the commercial registration certificate is issued, the entrepreneur obtains the commercial license from the Department of Companies. Agency: Department of Companies 1-2 days KWD 150 Register with the Chamber of Commerce and Industry 10 The company must apply for membership at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry by submitting copies of its commercial license and memorandum of association, and filling out a specimen signature form signed by the company's authorized signatories. The membership is a pre-requisite to dealing with other government authorities, banks and participation in public tenders. 1 day KWD 82 for registration and KWD 55 for annual renewal Agency: Chamber of Commerce Register with Public Authority for Civil Information (PACI) 11 The company must register with the Public Authority for Civil Information (PACI) in order to obtain a civil number, which is required in dealing with other governmental bodies. Agency: Public Authority for Civil Information (PACI) 15 days KWD 1 * Register at the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs 12 The Ministry of Labor may inspect the premises to determine whether the size of the company premises and its business scope are commensurate with the number of employees declared at the Ministry. Agency: Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs 15 days (simultaneous with procedure 11) KWD 25 * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database. Note: Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation.

25 25 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Regulation of construction is critical to protect the public. But it needs to be efficient, to avoid excessive constraints on a sector that plays an important part in every economy. Where complying with building regulations is excessively costly in time and money, many builders opt out. They may pay bribes to pass inspections or simply build illegally, leading to hazardous construction that puts public safety at risk. Where compliance is simple, straightforward and inexpensive, everyone is better off. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business records all procedures required for a business in the construction industry to build a warehouse along with the time and cost to complete each procedure. In addition, this year Doing Business introduces a new measure, the building quality control index, evaluating the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes, and professional certification requirements. The ranking of economies on the ease of dealing with construction permits is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores for dealing with construction permits. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for each of the component indicators. To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about the construction company, the warehouse project and the utility connections are used. Assumptions about the construction company The construction company (BuildCo): Is a limited liability company (or its legal equivalent). Operates in the economy s largest business city. For 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city. Is 100% domestically and privately owned. Has five owners, none of whom is a legal entity. Is fully licensed and insured to carry out construction projects, such as building warehouses. WHAT THE DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS INDICATORS MEASURE Procedures to legally build a warehouse (number) Submitting all relevant documents and obtaining all necessary clearances, licenses, permits and certificates Submitting all required notifications and receiving all necessary inspections Obtaining utility connections for water and sewerage Registering and selling the warehouse after its completion Time required to complete each procedure (calendar days) Does not include time spent gathering information Each procedure starts on a separate day. Procedures that can be fully completed online are recorded as ½ day Procedure considered completed once final document is received No prior contact with officials Cost required to complete each procedure (% of warehouse value) Official costs only, no bribes Building quality control index (0-15) Sum of the scores of six component indices: Quality of building regulations (0-2) Quality control before construction (0-1) Quality control during construction (0-3) Quality control after construction (0-3) Liability and insurance regimes (0-2) Professional certifications (0-4)

26 26 The construction company (BuildCo) (continued): Has 60 builders and other employees, all of them nationals with the technical expertise and professional experience necessary to obtain construction permits and approvals. Has at least one employee who is a licensed architect or engineer and registered with the local association of architects or engineers. BuildCo is not assumed to have any other employees who are technical or licensed experts, such as geological or topographical experts. Has paid all taxes and taken out all necessary insurance applicable to its general business activity (for example, accidental insurance for construction workers and third-person liability). Owns the land on which the warehouse will be built and will sell the warehouse upon its completion. Is valued at 50 times income per capita. Assumptions about the warehouse The warehouse: Will be used for general storage activities, such as storage of books or stationery. The warehouse will not be used for any goods requiring special conditions, such as food, chemicals or pharmaceuticals. Will have two stories, both above ground, with a total constructed area of approximately 1,300.6 square meters (14,000 square feet). Each floor will be 3 meters (9 feet, 10 inches) high. Will have road access and be located in the periurban area of the economy s largest business city (that is, on the fringes of the city but still within its official limits). For 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city. Will not be located in a special economic or industrial zone. Will be located on a land plot of approximately 929 square meters (10,000 square feet) that is 100% owned by BuildCo and is accurately registered in the cadastre and land registry. Will be a new construction (there was no previous construction on the land), with no trees, natural water sources, natural reserves or historical monuments of any kind on the plot. Will have complete architectural and technical plans prepared by a licensed architect. If preparation of the plans requires such steps as obtaining further documentation or getting prior approvals from external agencies, these are counted as procedures. Will include all technical equipment required to be fully operational. Will take 30 weeks to construct (excluding all delays due to administrative and regulatory requirements). Assumptions about the utility connections The water and sewerage connections: Will be 150 meters (492 feet) from the existing water source and sewer tap. If there is no water delivery infrastructure in the economy, a borehole will be dug. If there is no sewerage infrastructure, a septic tank in the smallest size available will be installed or built. Will not require water for fire protection reasons; a fire extinguishing system (dry system) will be used instead. If a wet fire protection system is required by law, it is assumed that the water demand specified below also covers the water needed for fire protection. Will have an average water use of 662 liters (175 gallons) a day and an average wastewater flow of 568 liters (150 gallons) a day. Will have a peak water use of 1,325 liters (350 gallons) a day and a peak wastewater flow of 1,136 liters (300 gallons) a day. Will have a constant level of water demand and wastewater flow throughout the year. Will be 1 inch in diameter for the water connection and 4 inches in diameter for the sewerage connection.

27 27 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to comply with the formalities to build a warehouse in? According to data collected by Doing Business, dealing with construction permits there requires procedures, takes days and costs 0.30% of the warehouse value (figure 3.1). Most indicator sets refer to a case scenario in the largest business city of an economy, except for 11 economies for which the data are a population-weighted average of the 2 largest business cities. See the chapter on distance to frontier and ease of doing business ranking at the end of this profile for more details. Figure 3.1 What it takes to comply with formalities to build a warehouse in Source: Doing Business database. Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation. For more information on the methodology of the dealing with construction permits indicators, see the Doing Business website ( For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter..

28 28 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Globally, stands at 133 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of dealing with construction permits (figure 3.2). The rankings for comparator economies and the regional average ranking provide other useful information for assessing how easy it is for an entrepreneur in to legally build a warehouse. Figure 3.2 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of dealing with construction permits Source: Doing Business database.

29 29 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS What are the details? The indicators reported here for are based on a set of specific procedures the steps that a company must complete to legally build a warehouse identified by Doing Business through information collected from experts in construction licensing, including architects, civil engineers, construction lawyers, construction firms, utility service providers and public officials who deal with building regulations. These procedures are those that apply to a company and structure matching the standard assumptions used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see the section in this chapter on what the indicators cover). BUILDING A WAREHOUSE Estimated value of warehouse : City : KWD 613,268 City The procedures, along with the associated time and cost, are summarized below. Table 3.2 Summary of time, cost and procedures for dealing with construction permits in No. Procedure Submit drawings and receive certificate from the Public Authority for Industry (PAI) Time to complete Cost to complete 1 Since the warehouse will be used for storage, BuildCo must submit the project drawings to the Public Authority for Industry (PAI). PAI will then review the drawings and issue an approval certificate. Submission of drawings to PAI is required for any construction that will be used for storage or industrial activities. 30 days no charge Agency: Public Authority for Industry (PAI) Obtain lot plan with site map from the Municipal Authority 2 BuildCo must request a lot plan physically at the municipality. A copy of the government s lease agreement is needed. Agency: Municipality of 3 days KWD 5 Obtain zoning approval from the Municipal Authority 3 BuildCo must request a zoning approval physically at the Municipality. Pursuant to Law 5 of 2005, the Municipality is mandated with the authority to plan the use of land in. This involves designating permitted uses of land based on mapped zones which separate one set of land uses from another (e.g. residential, industrial, recreational, etc). Once an area has been zoned (e.g. for industrial use), the location of an actual project / industry within the zone has to be approved by the Municipality. 12 days KWD 20 Agency: Municipality of

30 30 No. Procedure Time to complete Cost to complete * Request electricity and water plans approval from Ministry of Electricity and Water 4 According to No. 30/2012 issued by Municipality on August 2012, the building permit will not be granted unless the Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) gives its approval on the electric supply. A site inspection must be conducted before the approval can be issued. MEW is understaffed and therefore, it can take anywhere from 1 week to 1 month for the site inspection to happen. Approval of the plans can take 1-2 months after the inspection takes place. 1 day no charge Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water Receive electricity and water inspection from Ministry of Electricity and Water 5 Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water 1 day no charge Obtain electricity and water plans approval from Ministry of Electricity and Water 6 Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water 60 days no charge * Obtain approval of plans from Fire Services Directorate 7 Agency: Fire Services Directorate 30 days KWD 200 * Request sewage plans approval (sanitary certificate) from Ministry of Public Works 8 BuildCo must request approval of sewage plans from the Ministry of Public Works. Upon approval, the Ministry will issue a sanitary certificate. A site inspection must be conducted which takes about 10 days on average from the time of application. It then takes another 2 weeks to issue the certificate. 1 day no charge Agency: Ministry of Public Works

31 31 No. Procedure Time to complete Cost to complete Receive sewage inspection from Ministry of Public Works 9 Agency: Ministry of Public Works 1 day no charge Obtain sewage plans approval from Ministry of Public Works 10 Agency: Ministry of Public Works 24 days no charge * Conduct soil test with private laboratory 11 BuildCo must conduct a soil test with a private laboratory that is certified by the Municipality of. The soil test report must be submitted to the Municipality as part of the building permit application. 3 days KWD 75 Agency: Private Laboratory Request and obtain building permit 12 BuildCo must submit Application Form 1 for a building license and attach the following documents (including the documents described in the procedures above): A copy of the deed of title to the land, allocation decree, or lease agreement. In the case of an allocation decree or lease agreement, a recent rent receipt must be submitted. A copy of the architectural contract between BuildCo and an accredited engineering firm responsible for the architecture of the building Original letter of the zoning approval Third-party liability insurance policy (covering 2 or 3 years, depending on the time required to complete the building) Original copies of plans or blueprints of the building from the engineering firm, including all details of the external facade, internal design, internal and external diameters, calculation of building area and space area around the building Original soil test report Approval from the Safety Department Approval from the Roads Department, if underground parking is included (which does not apply to the warehouse project) Form 2, Undertaking of compliance of the plans with the buildings codes and cadastres, which should be signed and submitted (by an engineering firm) Form 3, Undertaking of compliance with the construction plans, 30 days KWD 200

32 32 No. Procedure which should be signed and submitted (by an engineering firm) Undertaking to provide specific plans (done by an engineering firm) that meet the requirements of: 1. The Ministry of Electricity and Energy for the electric supply. 2. The Ministry of Public Works for the sewerage system. 3. The Public Authority for Civil Aviation for the height of the warehouse. 4. The Ministry of Communications for the telephone lines. Time to complete Cost to complete While the application can be submitted online, BuildCo must follow up with hard copies of the supporting documents in order to have them stamped by the Municipality. Agency: Municipality of Obtain site take-over letter (supervision commitment license) 13 BuildCo must submit an application for the site take-over letter and attach the following documents: A copy of the construction license An undertaking from BuildCo that it shall carry out the construction work on the warehouse or, alternatively, that it has a construction contract with a contractor. In case of a construction contract with a contractor, a copy of the performance bond should be submitted. An undertaking from an accredited supervising engineer to supervise the construction approved by the municipality. 20 days KWD 10 The Municipality will then issue a site take-over letter, which essentially allows BuildCo (or the contractor) to take over the site and begin construction. Agency: Municipality of Submit final report and the file of cadastral measure of the structure to the Municipality for approval 14 BuildCo prepares the end of supervision commitment report with the supervising engineer's signature and the file of cadastral measure of the structure and submits them to Municipality. The file will be reviewed by the Engineering Supervisor (an employee of the Municipality) to ensure it contains all the required documentation and information. Municipality will then conduct a final inspection to ensure that the construction has been carried out to the necessary specifications (as per the building plans submitted and approved) and complies with the relevant constructions regulations entirely. Once the Municipality is satisfied with the information and documentation concerning the building s specifications and construction works, it will grant the necessary approvals. 1 day KWD 10

33 33 No. Procedure Time to complete Cost to complete Agency: Municipality of Receive final inspection from the Municipality 15 The municipality inspects the buildings to ensure compliance with the drawings. Agency: Municipality of 1 day no charge Receive final approval certificate from Municipality 16 Once the final inspection is carried out, BuildCo typically receives the final approval certificate from the Municipality within a week. The Municipality then forwards the certificate of no objection to the Ministry of Electricity and Water, the Fire Services Directorate and the Ministry of Public Works. 18 days no charge Agency: Municipality of Obtain commercial license from Ministry of Commerce 17 BuildCo must obtain a commercial license from the Ministry of Commerce certifying that building is for commercial use. Without this license, the warehouse cannot become operational. Agency: Ministry of Commerce 7 days no charge * Obtain water connection 18 Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water 7 days KWD 750 * Obtain sewage connection 19 Agency: Ministry of Public Works 7 days KWD * Receive inspection from the Fire Services Directorate Upon conducting a final inspection, the Fire Services Directorate will issue a certificate of fire and panic safety. Agency: Fire Services Directorate 1 day KWD 5

34 34 No. Procedure Time to complete Cost to complete Obtain certificate of fire and panic safety from the Fire Services Directorate 21 5 days no charge Agency: Fire Services Directorate Register building with the Real Estate Registry 22 Agency: Real Estate Registry 1 day KWD 10 * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database. Note: Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation.

35 35 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Building Quality Control Index The building quality control index is the sum of the scores on the quality of building regulations, quality control before construction, quality control during construction, quality control after construction, liability and insurance regimes, and professional certifications indices. The index ranges from 0 to 15, with higher values indicating better quality control and safety mechanisms in the construction permitting system. The indicator is based on the same case study assumptions as the measures of efficiency. Table 3.3 Summary of quality control and safety mechanisms in Answer Score Building quality control index (0-15) Quality of building regulations index (0-2) 1.00 In what way are the building regulations (including the building code) or any regulations dealing with construction permits made available? (0-1) Available online; Free of charge. 1.0 Which requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified by the building regulations or by any accessible website, brochure or pamphlet? (0-1) List of required documents; Fees to be paid. 0.0 Quality control before construction index (0-1) 1.00 Who is part of the committee or team that reviews and approves building permit applications in the relevant permit-issuing agency? (0-1) Licensed architect; Licensed engineer. 1.0 Quality control during construction index (0-3) 2.00 What types of inspections (if any) are required by law to be carried out during construction? (0-2) Do legally mandated inspections occur in practice during construction? (0-1) Inspections by in-house engineer. Mandatory inspections are always done in practice Quality control after construction index (0-3) 3.00 Is there a final inspection required by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and regulations? (0-2) Do legally mandated final inspections occur in practice? (0-1) Yes, final inspection is done by government agency; Yes, in-house engineer submits report for final inspection. Final inspection always occurs in practice Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) 2.00 Which parties (if any) are held liable by law for structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use? (0-1) Architect or engineer; Professional in charge of the supervision; Construction company. 1.0

36 36 Which parties (if any) are required by law to obtain an insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use? (0-1) Answer Construction company; Owner or investor. Score 1.0 Professional certifications index (0-4) 2.00 What are the qualification requirements for the professional responsible for verifying that the architectural plans or drawings are in compliance with existing building regulations? (0-2) What are the qualification requirements for the professional who supervises the construction on the ground? (0-2) Source: Doing Business database. University degree in architecture or engineering. Minimum number of years of experience; University degree in engineering, construction or construction management; Being a registered architect or engineer; Passing a certification exam

37 37 GETTING ELECTRICITY Access to reliable and affordable electricity is vital for businesses. To counter weak electricity supply, many firms in developing economies have to rely on selfsupply, often at a prohibitively high cost. Whether electricity is reliably available or not, the first step for a customer is always to gain access by obtaining a connection. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business records all procedures required for a local business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the time and cost to complete them. These procedures include applications and contracts with electricity utilities, clearances from other agencies and the external and final connection works. In addition, this year Doing Business adds two new measures: the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index (included in the aggregate distance to frontier score and ranking on the ease of doing business) and the price of electricity (omitted from these aggregate measures). The ranking of economies on the ease of getting electricity is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores for getting electricity. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for each of the component indicators. To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions are used. Assumptions about the warehouse The warehouse: Is owned by a local entrepreneur. Is located in the economy s largest business city. For 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city. Is located in an area where similar warehouses are typically located. In this area a new electricity connection is not eligible for a special investment promotion regime (offering special subsidization or faster service, for example). Is located in an area with no physical constraints. For example, the property is not near a railway. Is a new construction and is being connected to electricity for the first time. WHAT THE GETTING ELECTRICITY INDICATORS MEASURE Procedures to obtain an electricity connection (number) Submitting all relevant documents and obtaining all necessary clearances and permits Completing all required notifications and receiving all necessary inspections Obtaining external installation works and possibly purchasing material for these works Concluding any necessary supply contract and obtaining final supply Time required to complete each procedure (calendar days) Is at least 1 calendar day Each procedure starts on a separate day Does not include time spent gathering information Reflects the time spent in practice, with little follow-up and no prior contact with officials Cost required to complete each procedure (% of income per capita) Official costs only, no bribes Excludes value added tax The reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index Sum of the scores of six component indices: Duration and frequency of outages Tools to monitor power outages Tools to restore power supply Regulatory monitoring of utilities performance Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages Transparency and accessibility of tariffs Price of electricity (cents per kilowatt-hour)* Price based on monthly bill for commercial warehouse in case study *Price of electricity is not included in the calculation of distance to frontier nor ease of doing business ranking

38 38 Assumptions about the monthly consumption The warehouse (continued): Has two stories, both above ground, with a total surface area of approximately 1,300.6 square meters (14,000 square feet). The plot of land on which it is built is 929 square meters (10,000 square feet). Is used for storage of goods. Assumptions about the electricity connection The electricity connection: Is a permanent one. Is a three-phase, four-wire Y, 140-kilovoltampere (kva) (subscribed capacity) connection (where the voltage is 120/208 V, the current would be 400 amperes; where it is 230/400 B, the current would be nearly 200 amperes). Is 150 meters long. The connection is to either the low-voltage or the mediumvoltage distribution network and either overhead or underground, whichever is more common in the area where the warehouse is located. Requires works that involve the crossing of a 10-meter road (such as by excavation or overhead lines) but are all carried out on public land. There is no crossing of other owners private property because the warehouse has access to a road. Includes only a negligible length in the customer s private domain. Will supply monthly electricity consumption of 26,880 kilowatt-hours (kwh). Does not involve work to install the internal electrical wiring. This has already been completed, up to and including the customer s service panel or switchboard and installation of the meter base. It is assumed that the warehouse operates 8 hours a day for 30 days a month, with equipment utilized at 80% of capacity on average, and that there are no electricity cuts (assumed for simplicity). The subscribed capacity of the warehouse is 140 kva, with a power factor of 1 (1 kva = 1 kw). The monthly energy consumption is therefore 26,880 kwh, and the hourly consumption 112 kwh (26,880 kwh/30 days/8 hours). If multiple electricity suppliers exist, the warehouse is served by the cheapest supplier. Tariffs effective in March of the current year are used for calculation of the price of electricity for the warehouse.

39 39 GETTING ELECTRICITY Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to obtain a new electricity connection in? According to data collected by Doing Business, getting electricity there requires 8.00 procedures, takes days and costs 52.20% of income per capita (figure 4.1). Most indicator sets refer to a case scenario in the largest business city of an economy, except for 11 economies for which the data are a population-weighted average of the 2 largest business cities. See the chapter on distance to frontier and ease of doing business ranking at the end of this profile for more details. Figure 4.1 What it takes to obtain an electricity connection in Source: Doing Business database. Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. For more information on the methodology of the getting electricity indicators, see the Doing Business website ( For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter.

40 40 GETTING ELECTRICITY Globally, stands at 128 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of getting electricity (figure 4.2). The rankings for comparator economies and the regional average ranking provide another perspective in assessing how easy it is for an entrepreneur in to connect a warehouse to electricity. Figure 4.2 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of getting electricity Source: Doing Business database.

41 41 GETTING ELECTRICITY What are the details? The indicators reported here for are based on a set of specific procedures the steps that an entrepreneur must complete to get a warehouse connected to electricity by the local distribution utility identified by Doing Business. Data are collected from the distribution utility, then completed and verified by electricity regulatory agencies and independent professionals such as electrical engineers, electrical contractors and construction companies. The electricity distribution utility surveyed is the one serving the area (or areas) in which warehouses are located. If there is a choice of distribution utilities, the one serving the largest number of customers is selected. The procedures are those that apply to a warehouse and electricity connection matching the standard assumptions used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see the section in this chapter on what the indicators cover). The procedures, along with the associated time and cost, are summarized below. OBTAINING AN ELECTRICITY CONNECTION* Name of utility: Price of electricity (US cents per kwh): 1 City: Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) City *Price is calculated as a monthly consumption of 26,880 kwh for business customers, based on a standardized case study adopted by the getting electricity methodology. Doing Business measures the price of electricity but does not include these data when calculating the distance to frontier score for getting electricity or the ranking on the ease of getting electricity. Table 4.2 Summary of time, cost and procedures for getting electricity in No. Procedure Hire licensed electrical engineer to prepare study of electrical load and power requirement Time to complete Cost to complete 1 The client hires an engineering consulting firm that is approved by the union of engineers and that has a Supervision Engineer licensed by MEW. The consulting firm (i.e. contractor), will then study and estimate the electrical load and power requirement of the project so as to obtain MEW's approval/authorization for availability of electricity supply (see procedure below). The fees vary depending on the prices set by the contractor. 2 calendar days KWD 1,250 Agency: Electrical engineer licensed by the Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) Submit application to Ministry of Electricity and Water and await estimate 2 The client submits an application to the Distribution department of MEW to get the approval/authorization of electricity supply. The client needs to submit: - The study and estimate done by the consulting firm in Procedure copies to the concerned governorate engineer of the electrical 17 calendar days KWD 0

42 42 No. Procedure distribution network (EDN) department requesting approval/authorization for the electricity supply - Copy of the application after necessary approval duly signed and stamped by the governorate engineer - Licenses of construction Time to complete Cost to complete Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) * Receive site inspection by Ministry of Electricity and Water 3 The client obtains a site inspection from the Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) and awaits the estimate of connection fees. After the inspection is done, MEW hands the client a stamped approval and authorization 1 calendar day KWD 0 Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) Obtain "no objection" letter from municipality 4 After completing the building works and obtaining the approval of the municipality, the applicant will need to apply for a no-objection letter from the municipality. The municipality will then send the letter by mail to the Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) so the latter can install the meter and turn on supply of electricity to the project. 22 calendar days KWD 0 Agency: Municipality * Submit application for electrical installation 5 The client submits an application to the Installation Department of MEW for electrical installation. The client needs to submit the stamped approval and authorization obtained after the inspection. This procedure can be done online. However, the online system is not widely adopted yet. 13 calendar days KWD 0 Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) 6 * Submit final electrical drawings for approval and obtain inspection of internal wiring During or after execution of the internal wiring the client s licensed engineer will need to submit the final electrical drawings related to the internal wiring for approval to the Electrical Installation Department of 16 calendar days KWD 0

43 43 No. Procedure the Ministry. These drawings include air-conditioning, lighting and all other electrical equipment, electrical mains, switches, cable sizes, circuit breakers and fuses. The client will also need to submit a load form in order to obtain inspection of internal wiring and final connection. The load form will then be handed over to the applicant themselves. If the applicant is a company, the form will be handed over to an authorized staff of the company. The approval itself is granted after a couple of weeks, but is obtained in parallel with the external works. The inspection however, happens only after the Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) has obtained the letter of no-objection from the municipality. If the drawings meet the Ministry s specifications, then inspectors from the Electrical Installation Department of the Ministry will inspect the internal installation (size of cables, type of fuses, cable connection process and installation of main panels and sub-panels inside and outside the warehouse). The engineer also needs to submit approvals from the Municipality and the Fire Department. The Municipality will also check that plans are actually corresponding to latest drawings. Time to complete Cost to complete Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) Obtain external works from Electrical Installation Department 7 Once the drawings are approved, the client needs to pay the fees of the project to Ministry of Electricity & Water (MEW) for the power supply connection. This cost is for the equipment supplied by the ministry. The payment is done at the estimation department of MEW. The estimation department then gives the green light to the Electrical Distribution Networks Department so that external works can be started. External works are designed and carried out by the Electrical Distribution Networks Department of MEW. A 140-kVA load can be supplied from an existing distribution sub-station in the area, if capacity is available. In the absence of the infrastructure facilities, the holder of the license can allocate a space on the plot not exceeding 5x5 m2 for the MEW to install an electrical transformer to provide additional power to the plot. Having the transformer installed will not result in additional cost to the customer. The former scenario is however, the more likely one for the assumed case. 21 calendar days KWD 0 Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) Obtain meter installation and final turn-on of supply 8 The client needs to show a receipt of payment to one of the nearest emergency departments of the Ministry of Electricity and Water to obtain final supply. The meter is handed over to the client directly by the Consumer Affairs Department, and the installation is carried out by the Electrical Installation Department. 2 calendar days KWD 5,152.92

44 44 No. Procedure Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water (MEW) Time to complete Cost to complete * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database.

45 45 GETTING ELECTRICITY Reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index The reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index encompasses quantitative data on the duration and frequency of power outages as well as qualitative information on the mechanisms put in place by the utility for monitoring power outages and restoring power supply, the reporting relationship between the utility and the regulator for power outages, the transparency and accessibility of tariffs and whether the utility faces a financial deterrent aimed at limiting outages (such as a requirement to compensate customers or pay fines when outages exceed a certain cap). The index ranges from 0 to 8, with higher values indicating greater reliability of electricity supply and greater transparency of tariffs. Doing Business uses the system average interruption duration index (SAIDI) and the system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) to measure the duration and frequency of power outages in the largest business city of each economy (for 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city). SAIDI is the average total duration of outages over the course of a year for each customer served, while SAIFI is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. Annual data (covering the calendar year) are collected from distribution utility companies and national regulators on SAIDI and SAIFI. Both SAIDI and SAIFI estimates include load shedding. Table 4.3 Reliability of Supply and Transparency of Tariff Index in Answer Score Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) 3.00 Total duration and frequency of outages per customer a year (0-3) 2.00 System average interruption duration index (SAIDI) 3.1 System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) 0.8 Mechanisms for monitoring outages (0-1) 0.0 Does the distribution utility use automated tools to monitor outages? No Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) 0.0 Does the distribution utility use automated tools to restore service? No Regulatory monitoring (0-1) 0.00 Does a regulator that is, an entity separate from the utility monitor the utility s performance on reliability of supply? No Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages (0-1) 0.00 Does the utility either pay compensation to customers or face fines by the regulator (or both) if outages exceed a certain cap? No Communication of tariffs and tariff changes (0-1) 1.00 Are effective tariffs available online? Yes Link to the website, if available online

46 46 Answer gov.kw/?com=co ntent&act=view& id=92 Score Are customers notified of a change in tariff ahead of the billing cycle? Yes Source: Doing Business database. Note: If data on power outages is not collected or if the SAIFI index or SAIDI index are above the threshold of 100, the economy is not eligible to obtain a score in the Reliability of Supply and Transparency of Tariff Index. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 12 (equivalent to an outage of one hour each month) or below, a score of 1 is assigned. If SAIDI and SAIFI are 4 (equivalent to an outage of one hour each quarter) or below, 1 additional point is assigned. Finally, if SAIDI and SAIFI are 1 (equivalent to an outage of one hour per year) or below, 1 more point is assigned. Doing Business measures the price of electricity but does not include these data when calculating the distance to frontier score for getting electricity or the ranking on the ease of getting electricity. The price of electricity is measured in cents per kilowatt-hour. On the basis of the assumptions about monthly consumption, a monthly bill for a commercial warehouse in the largest business city of the economy is computed for the month of March. As noted, the warehouse uses electricity 30 days a month, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., so different tariff schedules may apply if a time-of-use tariff is available.

47 47 REGISTERING PROPERTY Ensuring formal property rights is fundamental. Effective administration of land is part of that. If formal property transfer is too costly or complicated, formal titles might go informal again. And where property is informal or poorly administered, it has little chance of being accepted as collateral for loans limiting access to finance. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business records the full sequence of procedures necessary for a business to purchase property from another business and transfer the property title to the buyer s name. The transaction is considered complete when it is opposable to third parties and when the buyer can use the property, use it as collateral for a bank loan or resell it. In addition, this year Doing Business adds a new measure to the set of registering property indicators, an index of the quality of the land administration system in each economy. The ranking of economies on the ease of registering property is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores for registering property. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for each of the component indicators. To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about the parties to the transaction, the property and the procedures are used. The parties (buyer and seller): Are limited liability companies, 100% domestically and privately owned and perform general commercial activities and are located in the economy s largest business city 2. Have 50 employees each, all of whom are nationals. The property (fully owned by the seller): Has a value of 50 times income per capita. The sale price equals the value and entire property will be transferred. Is registered in the land registry or cadastre, or both, and is free of title disputes. WHAT THE REGISTERING PROPERTY INDICATORS MEASURE Procedures to legally transfer title on immovable property (number) Preregistration (for example, checking for liens, notarizing sales agreement, paying property transfer taxes) Registration in the economy s largest business city 2 Postregistration (for example, filing title with the municipality) Time required to complete each procedure (calendar days) Does not include time spent gathering information Each procedure starts on a separate day. Procedures that can be fully completed online are recorded as ½ day. Procedure considered completed once final document is received No prior contact with officials Cost required to complete each procedure (% of property value) Official costs only, no bribes No value added or capital gains taxes included Quality of land administration index (0-30) Is located in a periurban commercial zone, and no rezoning is required. Has no mortgages attached, has been under the same ownership for the past 10 years. Consists of square meters (6,000 square feet) of land and a 10-year-old, 2-story warehouse of 929 square meters (10,000 square feet). The warehouse is in good condition and complies with all safety standards, building codes and legal requirements. There is no heating system. 2 For the 11 economies with a population of more than 100 million, data for a second city have been added.

48 48 REGISTERING PROPERTY Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to complete a property transfer in? According to data collected by Doing Business, registering property there requires 8.00 procedures, takes days and costs 0.50% of the property value (figure 5.1). Most indicator sets refer to a case scenario in the largest business city of an economy, except for 11 economies for which the data are a population-weighted average of the 2 largest business cities. See the chapter on distance to frontier and ease of doing business ranking at the end of this profile for more details. Figure 5.1 What it takes to register property in Source: Doing Business database. Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation. For more information on the methodology of the registering property indicators, see the Doing Business website ( For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter.

49 49 REGISTERING PROPERTY Globally, stands at 68 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of registering property (figure 5.2). The rankings for comparator economies and the regional average ranking provide other useful information for assessing how easy it is for an entrepreneur in to transfer property. Figure 5.2 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of registering property Source: Doing Business database.

50 50 REGISTERING PROPERTY What are the details? The indicators reported here are based on a set of specific procedures the steps that a buyer and seller must complete to transfer the property to the buyer s name identified by Doing Business through information collected from local property lawyers, notaries and property registries. These procedures are those that apply to a transaction matching the standard assumptions used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see the section in this chapter on what the indicators cover). The procedures, along with the associated time and cost, are summarized below. STANDARD PROPERTY TRANSFER Property value: KWD 613,268 City: City Table 5.2 Summary of time, cost and procedures for registering property in No. Procedure Apply for the Cadastral Description Certificate (Shahadat Al-Awsaf) from the Municipality Time to complete Cost to complete 1 The seller must request a Cadastral Description Certificate from the Municipality providing the details of the property in question (i.e. its size, the developments on it, the zoning, etc) and confirming that the property is in compliance with all the Municipality regulations. This document is prepared following an inspection of the property by an architect of the Municipality. The warehouse is likely to be in one of the following areas; Shuwaikh, Sulaibiya, Sabhan, Al Rai, Anghara and Ardiya. This is however not an exclusive list. The Municipality, which is the authority responsible for zoning, may authorize the construction of a warehouse in an area that is not ordinarily used for warehousing. The documentation shall include: Application from the seller on the selling company's letterhead Copy of the deed of title of the property provided by the seller Documents proving the authority of the person submitting the application on behalf of the seller The Cadastral Description Certificate will also include among other things; any violations that the property has incurred (e.g. non-maintenance of the property, or encroachment of the property borders on neighboring plots), any violations of the structure (e.g. if the building does not meet the fire regulations), usage of the plot (e.g. for commercial or residential purpose). Any licenses granted to the plot (e.g. license to have machinery brought onto the property to be used on the plot) and drawings of the plot and structures approved from the Municipality showing the areas and utilization of the plot. 1 day KWD 5 Agency: Municipality

51 51 No. Procedure Inspection of the property by an architect representing the Municipality Time to complete Cost to complete 2 The Municipality will send out an inspector/architect to inspect the property in question and collect the relevant information; after which the Municipality will issue the Cadastral Description Certificate and transfer the same along with a letter of no objection to the transfer to the Ministry of Justice to continue the process of the property transfer. It ordinarily takes between 7 12 days for the inspection of the property that is located within the Capital Province by an architect/engineer representing the Municipality. For properties located in the other provinces, the process may be shorter or longer depending on the work load of the Municipality officials. The process is typically as follows: the seller will go to the Municipality (with jurisdiction over the location of the warehouse to be sold) to submit an application for an allocation letter (specifying the size of the plot and the buildings on it if any) and a description certificate (description of the existing buildings if any on the plot and size/use of such building). The fee to be paid for these documents is KD10. The seller concurrently delivers the warehouse's title deed to the Municipality against a receipt thereof. The engineer/architect responsible for the area then fixes a date to meet with the seller at the warehouse to carry out the inspection, or may alternatively carry out the inspection on his own. Generally, this Procedure may take 10 working days (two weeks). Meanwhile, the seller should obtain clearance from the utility authorities (i.e. electricity, water and telephone). When the Municipality engineer completes the inspection and the Municipality has issued the descriptions certificate and the allocation letter for the property, the seller will be issued with a receipt with a reference number from the Municipality with which the seller will receive the original title deed, the allocation letter and the descriptions certificate from the General Registry Division at the Ministry of Justice days (simultaneous with Procedures 3, 4, and 5) KWD 10 Agency: Municipality * Obtain clearance from the Ministry of Communications 3 The Seller must obtain a clearance from the Ministry of Communications (necessary for all types of properties both commercial and residential). The clearance is to confirm that the previous owner/seller has settled all related utility bills. Agency: Ministry of Communications 1 day (simultaneous with Procedures 2, 4, and 5) no cost 4 * Obtain clearance from the Ministry of the Electricity regarding outstanding electricity bills Parties obtain a certificate of Ministry of Electricity and Water that there are no outstanding electricity bills or other dues to the Ministry. 1 day (simultaneous with Procedures 2, 3, and 5) no cost

52 52 No. Procedure Agency: Ministry of Electricity and Water Time to complete Cost to complete * Obtain a certificate from the Minister of Commerce and Industry evidencing the signatory authority of the legal representative of the parties 5 Parties obtain a certificate from the Minister of Commerce and Industry evidencing the signatory authority of the legal representative of the parties who will sign the sale agreement, together with copies of their civil identification cards. They obtain Form I "Undertaking & Acknowledgement" and Form IX "Acknowledgement of the Representative" from the Department of Commercial Companies at the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, that must be submitted for registration in Procedure 6. Form I shows that the parties exist and have the power to conclude the sale/purchase transaction in accordance with their own Article of Association. Form IX confirms the authority of their representatives who follow up the Procedures with the Department. This procedure takes place because the Buyer and Seller do not usually appear in person at the Ministry of Justice to proceed with the transaction; they send legal representatives instead. This is also to check that the companies are authorized to buy/sell property in their Articles of Association. 1 day (simultaneous with Procedures 2, 3, and 4) KWD 12 Agency: Minister of Commerce and Industry File an application requesting a transfer of title with the Contracts Control Department of the Real Estate Registration Office of the Ministry of Justice 6 Once the No Objection letter is received from the Municipality, the parties receive an SMS to come to the Ministry of Justice to complete the transaction. The seller must prepare an application requesting a transfer of title to be filed with the Contracts Control Department of the Real Estate Registration Office of the Ministry of Justice. The Contracts Control Department reviews the application and the attached documents internally (3-7 days). After reviewing the application, the Contracts Control Department will take an extra days to check all the documentation and approve the transfer. If approved, the form of the sale agreement is transferred to the notarization department for review. Once approved, the same is printed on the official green papers used by the Ministry and becomes ready for signature. The 0.5% registration fee is paid to the Department of Real Estate Registration & Authentication (Ministry of Justice) upon the completion of the registration Procedures, who approves the submitted documents before parties sign the notarized sale contract. The documentation shall include: a) Form of the sale agreement (available at the Real Estate Registration Office) b) Form I 15 calendar days 0.5% of property value (registration fee)

53 53 No. Procedure "Undertaking & Acknowledgement" signed by parties (obtained in Procedure 5) c) Form II "Immediate Sale Form" signed by parties (available at the Real Estate Registration Office) d) Form IX "Acknowledgement of the Representative" signed by parties (obtained in Procedure 5) e) Original deed of title of the property; f) A recent certificate from the Minister of Commerce and Industry evidencing the signatory power of the legal representative of the parties (obtained in Procedure 5). g) Copies of the articles of association of both companies. h) If powers of attorneys are used, copies thereof must be attached i) Municipal certificate of no objection (obtained in Procedure 3) Time to complete Cost to complete Agency: Real Estate Registration Office of the Ministry of Justice Legal representative of the parties must appear in person to sign the sale agreement before the notary public 7 The parties must appear in person or through their attorneys to sign the sale agreement before the notary public. The notary public verifies the contents of the written agreement (a form commonly prescribed by the Ministry of Justice), authenticates the required signatures, and satisfies all other related matters. The notary public is a governmental employee in providing public service and is part of the Ministry of Justice. The process may however take a longer (two working weeks at most) or shorter time frame depending on characteristics of the transaction (i.e. if it is a contentious issue) or the work load in the Ministry at the time of application. The duration of the process may also be affected by the identity of the entities or people involved (i.e. the process is relatively shorter and more straight forward for individuals while companies will likely take a longer period of time as more documentation is required e.g. board resolutions, minutes of meetings, etc). Furthermore, if the warehouse price reflected in the sale agreement is considered to be below the market value/price, the Ministry in such case may dispatch an expert to carry out a valuation of the warehouse to avoid any loss that may be incurred by the Ministry when it collects the transfer charges that are 0.5% of the property value. The process of the valuation of the warehouses may take approximately 5-10 days (one to two working weeks). The parties must either appear in person or send an attorney authorized to act on their behalf (holder of a Power of Attorney). The parties or their legal representatives have their IDs checked and are given an appointment 3 days later to come back for payment and final signing of the deed. 3 days no cost Agency: Notary public of Ministry of justice

54 54 No. Procedure The sale agreement is recorded under the name of the buyer by the Contracts Control Department Time to complete Cost to complete 8 The notary public delivers the notarized sale agreement to the Contracts Control Department for it to be recorded under the name of the purchasing company. The sale agreement is used as the deed of title. An original of the sale agreement, proving title, is delivered to the buyer thereafter. The actual registration process when the transaction is allocated a registration number occurs at the time the parties sign the agreement before the notary public who issues a registration number under which the agreement will be registered under the purchaser s name. The process is initiated when the parties receive the documents from the General Registry Division at the Ministry of Justice and fill in the application to register the transfer of title based on the sale agreement (i.e. registration application) and enclose all relevant documentation and submit it before the notary public at the Department for Real Estate and Registration. The notary public automatically delivers a copy of the notarized sale agreement to the Department of Real Estate and Registration. The buyer will receive a registration number on the notarized sale agreement (which is the new title deed for the property) at the time of signing the agreement before the notary public. The notarized sale agreement received on the date of signing the agreement will reflect the registration number under which the agreement has been registered. Agency: Contracts Control Department 20 days no cost * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database. Note: Online procedures account for 0.5 days in the total time calculation.

55 55 REGISTERING PROPERTY Quality of land administration The quality of land administration index is the sum of the scores on the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage and land dispute resolution indices. The index ranges from 0 to 30, with higher values indicating better quality of the land administration system. If private sector entities were unable to register property transfers in an economy between June 2014 and June 2015, the economy receives a no practice mark on the procedures, time and cost indicators. A no practice economy receives a score of 0 on the quality of land administration index even if its legal framework includes provisions related to land administration. Table 5.3 Summary of quality of land administration in Answer Score Quality of the land administration index (0-30) Reliability of infrastructure index (0-8) 4.00 What is the institution in charge of immovable property registration? In what format are the majority of title or deed records kept in the largest business city in a paper format or in a computerized format (scanned or fully digital)? Real Estate Registry at the Ministry of Justice Computer/Scann ed 1.0 Is there an electronic database for checking for encumbrances (liens, mortgages, restrictions and the like)? Institution in charge of the plans showing legal boundaries in the largest business city: No 0.0 Municipality In what format are the majority of maps of land plots kept in the largest business city in a paper format or in a computerized format (scanned or fully digital)? Computer/Scann ed 1.0 Is there an electronic database for recording boundaries, checking plans and providing cadastral information (geographic information system)? No 0.0 Is the information recorded by the immovable property registration agency and the cadastral or mapping agency kept in a single database, in different but linked databases or in separate databases? Different databases but linked 1.0 Do the immovable property registration agency and cadastral or mapping agency use the same identification number for properties? Yes 1.0 Transparency of information index (0 6) 1.00 Who is able to obtain information on land ownership at the agency in charge of immovable property registration in the largest business city? Only intermediaries and interested 0.0

56 56 Answer parties Score Is the list of documents that are required to complete any type of property transaction made publicly available and if so, how? Link for online access: Is the applicable fee schedule for any property transaction at the agency in charge of immovable property registration in the largest business city made publicly available and if so, how? Link for online access: Does the agency in charge of immovable property registration commit to delivering a legally binding document that proves property ownership within a specific time frame and if so, how does it communicate the service standard? Yes, online gov.kw/sites/ar/r ealestate/pages/ MOJServices.aspx Yes, online gov.kw/sites/ar/r ealestate/pages/ MOJServices.aspx No 0.0 Link for online access: Is there a specific and separate mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the agency in charge of immovable property registration? No 0.0 Contact information: Are there publicly available official statistics tracking the number of transactions at the immovable property registration agency? No 0.0 Number of property transfers in the largest business city in 2014: Who is able to consult maps of land plots in the largest business city? Only intermediaries and interested parties 0.0 Is the applicable fee schedule for accessing maps of land plots made publicly available and if so, how? Yes, in person 0.0 Link for online access: Does the cadastral or mapping agency commit to delivering an updated map within a specific time frame and if so, how does it communicate the service standard? No 0.0 Link for online access:

57 57 Is there a specific and separate mechanism for filing complaints about a problem that occurred at the cadastral or mapping agency? Answer Score No 0.0 Contact information: Geographic coverage index (0 8) 8.00 Are all privately held land plots in the economy formally registered at the immovable property registry? Are all privately held land plots in the largest business city formally registered at the immovable property registry? Yes 2.0 Yes 2.0 Are all privately held land plots in the economy mapped? Yes 2.0 Are all privately held land plots in the largest business city mapped? Yes 2.0 Land dispute resolution index (0 8) 4.50 Does the law require that all property sale transactions be registered at the immovable property registry to make them opposable to third parties? Is the system of immovable property registration subject to a state or private guarantee? Is there a specific compensation mechanism to cover for losses incurred by parties who engaged in good faith in a property transaction based on erroneous information certified by the immovable property registry? Does the legal system require a control of legality of the documents necessary for a property transaction (e.g., checking the compliance of contracts with requirements of the law)? If yes, who is responsible for checking the legality of the documents? Does the legal system require verification of the identity of the parties to a property transaction? If yes, who is responsible for verifying the identity of the parties? Is there a national database to verify the accuracy of identity documents? For a standard land dispute between two local businesses over tenure rights of a property worth 50 times gross national income (GNI) per capita and located in the largest business city, what court would be in charge of the case in the first instance? Yes 1.5 No 0.0 No 0.0 Yes 0.5 Registrar; Notary. Yes 0.5 Registrar; Notary. No 0.0 Court of First Instance How long does it take on average to obtain a decision from the firstinstance court for such a case (without appeal)? Between 1 and 2 years 2.0 Are there any statistics on the number of land disputes in the first No 0.0

58 58 instance? Number of land disputes in the largest business city in 2014: Answer Score Source: Doing Business database.

59 59 GETTING CREDIT Two types of frameworks can facilitate access to credit and improve its allocation: credit information systems and borrowers and lenders in collateral and bankruptcy laws. Credit information systems enable lenders rights to view a potential borrower s financial history (positive or negative) valuable information to consider when assessing risk. And they permit borrowers to establish a good credit history that will allow easier access to credit. Sound collateral laws enable businesses to use their assets, especially movable property, as security to generate capital while strong creditors rights have been associated with higher ratios of private sector credit to GDP. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business assesses the sharing of credit information and the legal rights of borrowers and lenders with respect to secured transactions through 2 sets of indicators. The depth of credit information index measures rules and practices affecting the coverage, scope and accessibility of credit information available through a credit registry or a credit bureau. The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. Doing Business uses two case scenarios, Case A and Case B, to determine the scope of the secured transactions system, involving a secured borrower and a secured lender and examining legal restrictions on the use of movable collateral (for more details on each case, see the Data Notes section of the Doing Business 2016 report). These scenarios assume that the borrower: Is a private limited liability company. Has its headquarters and only base of operations in the largest business city. For the 11 economies with a population of more than 100 million, data for a second city have been added. WHAT THE GETTING CREDIT INDICATORS MEASURE Strength of legal rights index (0 12) Rights of borrowers and lenders through collateral laws Protection of secured creditors rights through bankruptcy laws Depth of credit information index (0 8) Scope and accessibility of credit information distributed by credit bureaus and credit registries Credit bureau coverage (% of adults) Number of individuals and firms listed in largest credit bureau as percentage of adult population Credit registry coverage (% of adults) Number of individuals and firms listed in credit registry as percentage of adult population Has up to 50 employees. Is 100% domestically owned, as is the lender. The ranking of economies on the ease of getting credit is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores for getting credit. These scores are the distance to frontier score for the strength of legal rights index and the depth of credit information index.

60 60 GETTING CREDIT Where does the economy stand today? How well do the credit information system and collateral and bankruptcy laws in facilitate access to credit? The economy has a score of 6.00 on the depth of credit information index and a score of 2.00 on the strength of legal rights index (see the summary of scoring at the end of this chapter for details). Higher scores indicate more credit information and stronger legal rights for borrowers and lenders. Globally, stands at 109 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of getting credit (figure 6.1). The rankings for comparator economies provide other useful information for assessing how well regulations and institutions in support lending and borrowing. Figure 6.1 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of getting credit Source: Doing Business database.

61 61 GETTING CREDIT One way to put an economy s score on the getting credit indicators into context is to see where the economy stands in the distribution of scores across economies. Figure 6.2 highlights the score on the strength of legal rights index for and shows the scores for comparator economies as well as the regional average score. Figure 6.3 shows the same for the depth of credit information index. Figure 6.2 How strong are legal rights for borrowers and lenders? Economy scores on strength of legal rights index Figure 6.3 How much credit information is shared and how widely? Economy scores on depth of credit information index Source: Doing Business database. Note: Higher scores indicate that collateral and bankruptcy laws are better designed to facilitate access to credit. Source: Doing Business database. Source: Doing Business database. Note: Higher scores indicate the availability of more credit information, from either a credit registry or a credit bureau, to facilitate lending decisions. If the credit bureau or registry is not operational or covers less than 5% of the adult population, the total score on the depth of credit information index is 0.

62 62 GETTING CREDIT What are the details? The getting credit indicators reported here for are based on detailed information collected in that economy. The data on credit information sharing are collected through a survey of a credit registry and/or credit bureau (if one exists). To construct the depth of credit information index, a score of 1 is assigned for each of 8 features of the credit registry or credit bureau (see summary of scoring below). The data on the legal rights of borrowers and lenders are gathered through a survey of financial lawyers and verified through analysis of laws and regulations as well as public sources of information on collateral and bankruptcy laws. For the strength of legal rights index, a score of 1 is assigned for each of 10 aspects related to legal rights in collateral law and 2 aspects in bankruptcy law. Strength of legal rights index (0 12) Index score: 2.00 Does an integrated or unified legal framework for secured transactions that extends to the creation, publicity and enforcement of functional equivalents to security interests in movable assets exist in the economy? Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in a single category of movable assets, without requiring a specific description of collateral? Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in substantially all of its assets, without requiring a specific description of collateral? May a security right extend to future or after-acquired assets, and may it extend automatically to the products, proceeds or replacements of the original assets? Is a general description of debts and obligations permitted in collateral agreements; can all types of debts and obligations be secured between parties; and can the collateral agreement include a maximum amount for which the assets are encumbered? Is a collateral registry in operation for both incorporated and non-incorporated entities, that is unified geographically and by asset type, with an electronic database indexed by debtor's name? Does a notice-based collateral registry exist in which all functional equivalents can be registered? Does a modern collateral registry exist in which registrations, amendments, cancellations and searches can be performed online by any interested third party? Are secured creditors paid first (i.e. before tax claims and employee claims) when a debtor defaults outside an insolvency procedure? Are secured creditors paid first (i.e. before tax claims and employee claims) when a business is liquidated? Are secured creditors subject to an automatic stay on enforcement when a debtor enters a court-supervised reorganization procedure? Does the law protect secured creditors rights by providing clear grounds for relief from the stay and/or sets a time limit for it? Does the law allow parties to agree on out of court enforcement at the time a security interest is created? Does the law allow the secured creditor to sell the collateral through public auction and private tender, as well as, for the secured creditor to keep the asset in satisfaction of the debt? No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No

63 63 Depth of credit information index (0 8) Credit bureau Credit registry Index score: 6.00 Are data on both firms and individuals distributed? No Yes 1 Are both positive and negative credit data distributed? Yes No 1 Are data from retailers or utility companies - in addition to data from banks and financial institutions - distributed? Are at least 2 years of historical data distributed? (Credit bureaus and registries that distribute more than 10 years of negative data or erase data on defaults as soon as they are repaid obtain a score of 0 for this component.) Are data on loan amounts below 1% of income per capita distributed? By law, do borrowers have the right to access their data in the credit bureau or credit registry? Can banks and financial institutions access borrowers credit information online (for example, through an online platform, a system-to-system connection or both)? Are bureau or registry credit scores offered as a valueadded service to help banks and financial institutions assess the creditworthiness of borrowers? Yes No 1 Yes No 1 Yes No 1 No No 0 Yes Yes 1 No No 0 Note: An economy receives a score of 1 if there is a "yes" to either bureau or registry. If the credit bureau or registry is not operational or covers less than 5% of the adult population, the total score on the depth of credit information index is 0. Coverage Credit bureau Credit registry Number of firms 0 15,426 Number of individuals 867, ,873 Total 867, ,299 Total percentage of adult population Source: Doing Business database.

64 64 PROTECTING MINORITY INVESTORS Protecting minority investors matters for the ability of companies to raise the capital they need to grow, innovate, diversify and compete. Effective regulations define related-party transactions precisely, promote clear and efficient disclosure requirements, require shareholder participation in major decisions of the company and set detailed standards of accountability for company insiders. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business measures the protection of minority investors from conflicts of interest through one set of indicators and shareholders rights in corporate governance through another. The ranking of economies on the strength of minority investor protections is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores for protecting minority investors. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for the extent of conflict of interest regulation index and the extent of shareholder governance index. To make the data comparable across economies, a case study uses several assumptions about the business and the transaction. The business (Buyer): Is a publicly traded corporation listed on the economy s most important stock exchange (or at least a large private company with multiple shareholders). Has a board of directors and a chief executive officer (CEO) who may legally act on behalf of Buyer where permitted, even if this is not specifically required by law. The transaction involves the following details: Mr. James, a director and the majority shareholder of the company, proposes that the company purchase used trucks from another company he owns. The price is higher than the going price for used trucks, but the transaction goes forward. All required approvals are obtained, and all required disclosures made, though the transaction is prejudicial to Buyer. Shareholders sue the interested parties and the members of the board of directors. WHAT THE PROTECTING MINORITY INVESTORS INDICATORS MEASURE Extent of disclosure index (0 10) Review and approval requirements for related-party transactions; Disclosure requirements for relatedparty transactions Extent of director liability index (0 10) Ability of minority shareholders to sue and hold interested directors liable for prejudicial related-party transactions; Available legal remedies (damages, disgorgement of profits, fines, imprisonment, rescission of the transaction) Ease of shareholder suits index (0 10) Access to internal corporate documents; Evidence obtainable during trial and allocation of legal expenses Extent of conflict of interest regulation index (0 10) Simple average of the extent of disclosure, extent of director liability and ease of shareholder indices Extent of shareholder rights index (0-10) Shareholders rights and role in major corporate decisions Extent of ownership and control index (0-10) Governance safeguards protecting shareholders from undue board control and entrenchment Extent of corporate transparency index (0-10) Corporate transparency on ownership stakes, compensation, audits and financial prospects Extent of shareholder governance index (0 10) Simple average of the extent of shareholders rights, extent of ownership and control and extent of corporate transparency indices Strength of investor protection index (0 10) Simple average of the extent of conflict of interest regulation and extent of shareholder governance indices

65 65 PROTECTING MINORITY INVESTORS Where does the economy stand today? How strong are minority investor protections against self-dealing in? The economy has a score of 5.70 on the strength of minority investor protection index, with a higher score indicating stronger protections. Globally, stands at 66 in the ranking of 189 economies on the strength of minority investor protection index (figure 7.1). While the indicator does not measure all aspects related to the protection of minority investors, a higher ranking does indicate that an economy s regulations offer stronger minority investor protections against self-dealing in the areas measured. Figure 7.1 How and comparator economies perform on the strength of minority investor protection index Source: Doing Business database.

66 66 PROTECTING MINORITY INVESTORS One way to put an economy s scores on the protecting minority investors indicators into context is to see where the economy stands in the distribution of scores across comparator economies. Figure 7.2 highlights the scores on the various minority investor protection indices for. A summary of scoring for the protecting minority investors indicators at the end of this chapter provides details on how the indices were calculated. Figure 7.2 Summary of the various minority investor protection indices for and comparator economies. Source: Doing Business database.

67 67 PROTECTING MINORITY INVESTORS Economies with the strongest protections of minority investors from self-dealing require detailed disclosure and define clear duties for directors. They also have wellfunctioning courts and up-to-date procedural rules that give minority shareholders the means to prove their case and obtain a judgment within a reasonable time. As a result, reforms to strengthen minority investor protections may move ahead on different fronts such as through new or amended company laws, securities regulations or civil procedure rules. What minority investor protection reforms has Doing Business recorded in (table 7.1)? Table 7.1 How has strengthened minority investor protections or not? By Doing Business report year from DB2011 to DB2016 DB year Reform DB2014 strengthened investor protections by making it possible for minority shareholders to request the appointment of an auditor to review the company s activities. Source: Doing Business database. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2006), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at

68 68 PROTECTING MINORITY INVESTORS What are the details? The protecting minority investors indicators reported here for are based on detailed information collected through a survey of corporate and securities lawyers about securities regulations, company laws and court rules of evidence and procedure. To construct the six indicators on minority investor protection, scores are assigned to each based on a range of conditions relating to disclosure, director liability, shareholder suits, shareholder rights, ownership and control and corporate transparency in a standard case study (for more details, see the Data Notes section of the Doing Business 2016 report). The summary below shows the details underlying the scores for. Table 7.2 Summary of scoring for the protecting minority investors indicators in Answer Score Strength of minority investor protection index (0-10) 5.70 Extent of conflict of interest regulation index (0-10) 5.70 Extent of disclosure index (0-10) 4.00 Which corporate body can provide legally sufficient approval for the Buyer-Seller transaction? (0-3) Is disclosure by the interested director to the board of directors required? (0-2) Is disclosure of the transaction in published periodic filings (annual reports) required? (0-2) Is immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public and/or shareholders required? (0-2) Must an external body review the terms of the transaction before it takes place? (0-1) Shareholders excluding interested parties 3.0 No disclosure obligation 0.0 Disclosure on the transaction only 1.0 No disclosure obligation 0.0 No 0.0 Extent of director liability index (0-10) 9.00 Can shareholders sue directly or derivatively for the damage caused by the Buyer-Seller transaction to the company? (0- Yes 1.0 1) Can shareholders hold the interested director liable for the damage caused by the transaction to the company? (0-2) Liable if unfair or prejudicial 2.0 Can shareholders hold members of the approving body liable for the damage cause by the transaction to the Liable if unfair or prejudicial 2.0 company? (0-2) Must the interested director pay damages for the harm caused to the company upon a successful claim by a Yes 1.0 shareholder plaintiff? (0-1) Must the interested director repay profits made from the transaction upon a successful claim by a shareholder No 0.0 plaintiff? (0-1) Is the interested director fined and imprisoned or disqualified upon a successful claim by the shareholder Yes 1.0 plaintiff? (0-1) Can a court void the transaction upon a successful claim by a shareholder plaintiff? (0-2) Voidable if unfair or prejducial 2.0 Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) 4.00 Before filing suit, can shareholders owning 10% of the Yes 1.0

69 69 company s share capital inspect the transaction documents? (0-1) Can the plaintiff obtain any documents from the defendant and witnesses during trial? (0-3) Can the plaintiff request categories of documents from the defendant without identifying specific ones? (0-1) Can the plaintiff directly question the defendant and witnesses during trial? (0-2) Is the level of proof required for civil suits lower than that of criminal cases? (0-1) Can shareholder plaintiffs recover their legal expenses from the company? (0-2) Documents that the defendant relied on 1.0 No 0.0 No 0.0 Yes 1.0 Yes if successful 1.0 Extent of shareholder governance index (0-10) 5.70 Extent of shareholder rights index (0-10) 4.00 Does the sale of 51% of Buyer s assets require shareholder approval? No 0.0 Can shareholders representing 10% of Buyer s share capital call for an extraordinary meeting of shareholders? No 0.0 Must Buyer obtain its shareholders approval every time it issues new shares? Yes 1.0 Do shareholders automatically receive preemption rights every time Buyer issues new shares? No 0.0 Must shareholders approve the election and dismissal of the external auditor? Yes 1.0 Must changes to the voting rights of a class of shares be approved only by the holders of the affected shares? Yes 1.0 Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, does the sale of 51% of Buyer s assets requires shareholder approval? No 0.0 Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, can shareholders representing 10% of Buyer s share capital call for an No 0.0 extraordinary meeting of shareholders? Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must Buyer obtain its shareholders approval every time it issues new Yes 1.0 shares? Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, do shareholders automatically receive preemption rights every time Buyer No 0.0 issues new shares? Extent of ownership and control index (0-10) 6.00 Is the CEO prohibited from also being chair of the board of directors? Yes 1.0 Must the board of directors include independent and nonexecutive board members? Yes 1.0 Can shareholders remove members of Buyer s board of directors without cause before the end of their term? Yes 1.0 Must Buyer s board of directors include a separate audit committee? Yes 1.0 Must a potential acquirer make a tender offer to all shareholders upon acquiring 50% of Buyer? Yes 1.0 Must Buyer pay dividends within a maximum period set by law after the declaration date? No 0.0 Is a subsidiary prohibited from acquiring shares issued by its parent company? No 0.0

70 70 Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, can shareholders remove members of Buyer s board of directors without Yes 1.0 cause before the end of their term? Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must a potential acquirer make a tender offer to all shareholders upon No 0.0 acquiring 50% of Buyer? Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must Buyer pay dividends within a maximum period set by law after the No 0.0 declaration date? Extent of corporate transparency index (0-10) 7.00 Must Buyer disclose direct and indirect beneficial ownership stakes representing 5%? Yes 1.0 Must Buyer disclose information about board members other directorships as well as basic information on their Yes 1.0 primary employment? Must Buyer disclose the compensation of individual managers? Yes 1.0 Must a detailed notice of general meeting be sent 30 days before the meeting? No 0.0 Can shareholders representing 5% of Buyer s share capital put items on the agenda for the general meeting? Yes 1.0 Must Buyer's annual financial statements be audited by an external auditor? Yes 1.0 Must Buyer disclose its audit reports to the public. Yes 1.0 Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must a detailed notice of general meeting be sent 30 days before the No 0.0 meeting? Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, can shareholders representing 5% of Buyer s share capital put items on the No 0.0 agenda for the general meeting? Assuming that Buyer is a limited company, must Buyer's annual financial statements be audited by an external auditor? Yes 1.0 Source: Doing Business database.

71 71 PAYING TAXES Taxes are essential. The level of tax rates needs to be carefully chosen and needless complexity in tax rules avoided. Firms in economies that rank better on the ease of paying taxes in the Doing Business study tend to perceive both tax rates and tax administration as less of an obstacle to business according to the World Bank Enterprise Survey research. What do the indicators cover? Using a case scenario, Doing Business records the taxes and mandatory contributions that a mediumsize company must pay in a given year as well as measures of the administrative burden of paying taxes and contributions. This case scenario uses a set of financial statements and assumptions about transactions made over the year. Information is also compiled on the frequency of filing and payments as well as time taken to comply with tax laws. The ranking of economies on the ease of paying taxes is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores on the ease of paying taxes. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for each of the component indicators, with a threshold and a nonlinear transformation applied to one of the component indicators, the total tax rate 3. All financial statement variables are proportional to 2012 income per capita. To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions are used. TaxpayerCo is a medium-size business that started operations on January 1, The business starts from the same financial position in each economy. All the taxes and mandatory contributions paid during the second year of operation are recorded. Taxes and mandatory contributions are measured at all levels of government. WHAT THE PAYING TAXES INDICATORS MEASURE Tax payments for a manufacturing company in 2014 (number per year adjusted for electronic and joint filing and payment) Total number of taxes and contributions paid, including consumption taxes (value added tax, sales tax or goods and service tax) Method and frequency of filing and payment Time required to comply with 3 major taxes (hours per year) Collecting information and computing the tax payable Completing tax return forms, filing with proper agencies Arranging payment or withholding Preparing separate tax accounting books, if required Total tax rate (% of profit before all taxes) Profit or corporate income tax Social contributions and labor taxes paid by the employer Property and property transfer taxes Dividend, capital gains and financial transactions taxes Waste collection, vehicle, road and other taxes Taxes and mandatory contributions include corporate income tax, turnover tax and all labor taxes and contributions paid by the company. A range of standard deductions and exemptions are also recorded. 3 The nonlinear distance to frontier for the total tax rate is equal to the distance to frontier for the total tax rate to the power of 0.8. The threshold is defined as the total tax rate at the 15th percentile of the overall distribution for all years included in the analysis up to and including Doing Business 2015, which is 26.1%. All economies with a total tax rate below this threshold receive the same score as the economy at the threshold.

72 72 PAYING TAXES Where does the economy stand today? What is the administrative burden of complying with taxes in and how much do firms pay in taxes? On average, firms make tax payments a year, spend hours a year filing, preparing and paying taxes and pay total taxes amounting to 13.00% of profit (see the summary at the end of this chapter for details). Most indicator sets refer to a case scenario in the largest business city of an economy, except for 11 economies for which the data are a population-weighted average of the Figure 8.1 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of paying taxes 2 largest business cities. See the chapter on distance to frontier and ease of doing business ranking at the end of this profile for more details. Globally, stands at 11 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of paying taxes (figure 8.1). The rankings for comparator economies and the regional average ranking provide other useful information for assessing the tax compliance burden for businesses in. Source: Doing Business database.

73 73 PAYING TAXES What are the details? The indicators reported here for are based on the taxes and contributions that would be paid by a standardized case study company used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see the section in this chapter on what the indicators cover). Tax practitioners are asked to review a set of financial statements as well as a standardized list of assumptions and transactions that the company completed during its 2nd year of operation. Respondents are asked how much taxes and mandatory contributions the business must pay and how these taxes are filed and paid. LOCATION OF STANDARDIZED COMPANY City: City The taxes and contributions paid are listed in the summary below, along with the associated number of payments, time and tax rate. Table 8.2 Summary of tax rates and administration Tax or mandatory contribution Payments (number) Notes on payments Time (hours) Statutory tax rate Tax base Total tax rate (% of profit) Notes on total tax rate Employer paid -Social security contributions gross salaries Employee paid - Social security contributions 0 withheld 0.08 gross salaries 0 not included Totals Source: Doing Business database.

74 74 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS In today s globalized world, making trade between economies easier is increasingly important for business. Excessive document requirements, burdensome customs procedures, inefficient port operations and inadequate infrastructure all lead to extra costs and delays for exporters and importers, stifling trade potential. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business records the time and cost associated with the logistical process of exporting and importing goods. Under the new methodology introduced this year, Doing Business measures the time and cost (excluding tariffs) associated with three sets of procedures documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The ranking of economies on the ease of trading across borders is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores for trading across borders. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. To make the data comparable across economies, a few assumptions are made about the traded goods and the transactions: Time Time is measured in hours, and 1 day is 24 hours (for example, 22 days are recorded as = 528 hours). If customs clearance takes 7.5 hours, the data are recorded as is. Alternatively, suppose that documents are submitted to a customs agency at 8:00 a.m., are processed overnight and can be picked up at 8:00 a.m. the next day. In this case the time for customs clearance would be recorded as 24 hours because the actual procedure took 24 hours. WHAT THE TRADING ACROSS BORDERS INDICATORS MEASURE FOR IMPORT & EXPORT Documentary compliance cost (US$) & time (hours) Obtain, prepare and submit documents: -During transport, clearance, inspections and port or border handling in origin economy -Required by origin, transit and destination economies Covers all documents by law and in practice Border compliance cost (US$) & time (hours) Customs clearance and inspections Inspections by other agencies Port or border handling Obtaining, preparing and submitting documents during clearance, inspections and port or border handling Domestic transport* Loading and unloading of shipment Transport between warehouse and terminal/port Transport between terminal/port and border Obtaining, preparing and submitting documents during domestic transport Traffic delays and road police checks while shipment is en route * Although Doing Business collects and publishes data on the time and cost for domestic transport, it does not use these data in calculating the distance to frontier score for trading across borders or the ranking on the ease of trading across borders. Cost Insurance cost and informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. Costs are reported in U.S. dollars. Contributors are asked to convert local currency into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate prevailing on the day they answer the questionnaire.

75 75 Assumptions of the case study For each of the 189 economies covered by Doing Business, it is assumed that a shipment travels from a warehouse in the largest business city of the exporting economy to a warehouse in the largest business city of the importing economy. For 11 economies the data are also collected, under the same case study assumptions, for the second largest business city. The import and export case studies assume different traded products. It is assumed that each economy imports a standardized shipment of 15 metric tons of containerized auto parts (HS 8708) from its natural import partner the economy from which it imports the largest value (price times quantity) of auto parts. It is assumed that each economy exports the product of its comparative advantage (defined by the largest export value) to its natural export partner the economy that is the largest purchaser of this product. Precious metal and gems, live animals and pharmaceuticals are excluded from the list of possible export products, however, and the second largest product category is considered as needed. To identify the trading partners and export product for each economy, Doing Business collected data on trade flows for the most recent four-year period from international databases such as the United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database (UN Comtrade). For economies for which trade flow data were not available, data from ancillary government sources (various ministries and departments) and World Bank Group country offices were used to identify the export product and natural trading partners. A shipment is a unit of trade. Export shipments do not necessarily need to be containerized, while import shipments of auto parts are assumed to be containerized. Shipping cost based on weight is assumed to be greater than shipping cost based on volume. If government fees are determined by the value of the shipment, the value is assumed to be $50,000. The product is new, not secondhand or used merchandise. The exporting firm is responsible for hiring and paying for a freight forwarder or customs broker (or both) and pays for all costs related to international shipping, domestic transport, clearance and mandatory inspections by customs and other government agencies, port or border handling, documentary compliance fees and the like for exports. The importing firm is responsible for the above costs for imports. The mode of transport is the one most widely used for the chosen export or import product and the trading partner, as is the seaport, airport or land border crossing. All electronic submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the export or import process. A port or border is defined as a place (seaport, airport or land border crossing) where merchandise can enter or leave an economy. Government agencies considered relevant are agencies such as customs, port authorities, road police, border guards, standardization agencies, ministries or departments of agriculture or industry, national security agencies and any other government authorities.

76 76 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS Where does the economy stand today? The Trading across Border indicator refers to a case study scenario of a warehouse in the largest business city of an economy (except for 11 economies for which the data are a population-weighted average of the 2 largest business cities) trading with the main import and export partner through the economy s main border crossing. Globally, stands at 149 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of trading across borders (figure 9.1). While not included in the distance to frontier or ease of doing business ranking, data on domestic transportation is also recorded for all economies and provided in Table 9.3. Figure 9.1 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of trading across borders Source: Doing Business database.

77 77 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS What are the details? The indicators reported here for are based on a set of specific predefined procedures for trading a shipment of goods by the most widely used mode of transport (whether sea, land, air or some combination of these). The information on the time and cost to complete export and import is collected from local freight forwarders, customs brokers and traders. LOCATION OF STANDARDIZED COMPANY City: City The details on the predefined set of procedures, and the associated time and cost, for exporting and importing a shipment of goods are listed in the summary bellow, along with the required documents. Table 9.2 Summary of export and import time and cost for trading across borders in Middle East & North Africa Time to export: Border compliance (hours) Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) Time to import: Border compliance (hours) Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) Source: Doing Business database. Table 9.3 Summary of trading details, transport time and documents for trading across borders in Product Export HS 29: Organic chemicals Import HS 8708: Parts and accessories of motor vehicles Trade partner India Japan Border Shuwaikh port Shuwaikh port Distance (km) Domestic transport time (hours) 2 2 Domestic transport cost (USD) Domestic transport speed (km/hour) Domestic transport cost per distance (USD/km)

78 78 Source: Doing Business database. Note: Although Doing Business collects and publishes data on the time and cost for domestic transport, it does not use these data in calculating the distance to frontier score for trading across borders or the ranking on the ease of trading across borders. Documents to export Bill of lading Certificate of origin Chemical license from Ministry of Industry Commercial invoice Customs Export Declaration Delivery order EPA certificate Export license Packing list Documents to import Bayan Bill of lading Cargo release order Certificate of conformity Certificate of origin Commercial invoice Packing list Terminal handling receipt Trade license Source: Doing Business database. Note: Doing Business continues to collect data on the number of documents needed to trade internationally. Unlike in previous years, however, these data are excluded from the calculation of the distance to frontier score and ranking. The time and cost for documentary compliance serve as better measures of the overall cost and complexity of compliance with documentary requirements than does the number of documents required.

79 79 Figure 9.2 Summary of on the ease of trading across borders Export Import Source: Doing Business database.

80 80 ENFORCING CONTRACTS Effective commercial dispute resolution has many benefits. Courts are essential for entrepreneurs because they interpret the rules of the market and protect economic rights. Efficient and transparent courts encourage new business relationships because businesses know they can rely on the courts if a new customer fails to pay. Speedy trials are essential for small enterprises, which may lack the resources to stay in business while awaiting the outcome of a long court dispute. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business measures the time and cost for resolving a standardized commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. In addition, this year it introduces a new measure, the quality of judicial processes index, evaluating whether each economy has adopted a series of good practices that promote quality and efficiency in the court system. This new index replaces the indicator on procedures, which was eliminated this year. The ranking of economies on the ease of enforcing contracts is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for each of the component indicators. The dispute in the case study involves the breach of a sales contract between 2 domestic businesses. The case study assumes that the court hears an expert on the quality of the goods in dispute. This distinguishes the case from simple debt enforcement. To make the data comparable across economies, Doing Business uses several assumptions about the case: The dispute concerns a lawful transaction between two businesses (Seller and Buyer), both located in the economy s largest business city. For 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city. The buyer orders custom-made goods, then fails to pay. WHAT THE ENFORCING CONTRACTS INDICATORS MEASURE Time required to enforce a contract through the courts (calendar days) Time to file and serve the case Time for trial and to obtain the judgment Time to enforce the judgment Cost required to enforce a contract through the courts (% of claim) Attorney fees Court fees Enforcement fees Quality of judicial processes index (0-18) Court structure and proceedings (0-5) Case management (0-6) Court automation (0-4) Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) The value of the dispute is 200% of the income per capita or the equivalent in local currency of USD 5,000, whichever is greater. The seller sues the buyer before the court with jurisdiction over commercial cases worth 200% of income per capita or $5,000. The seller requests a pretrial attachment to secure the claim. The dispute on the quality of the goods requires an expert opinion. The judge decides in favor of the seller; there is no appeal. The seller enforces the judgment through a public sale of the buyer s movable assets.

81 81 ENFORCING CONTRACTS Where does the economy stand today? How efficient is the process of resolving a commercial dispute through the courts in? According to data collected by Doing Business, contract enforcement takes days and costs 18.60% of the value of the claim. Most indicator sets refer to the largest business city of an economy, except for 11 economies for which the data are a population-weighted average of the 2 largest business cities. See the chapter on distance to frontier and ease of doing business ranking at the end of this profile for more details. Globally, stands at 58 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of enforcing contracts (figure 10.1). The rankings for comparator economies and the regional average ranking provide other useful benchmarks for assessing the efficiency of contract enforcement in. Figure 10.1 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of enforcing contracts Source: Doing Business database.

82 82 ENFORCING CONTRACTS What are the details? The data on time and cost reported here for are built by following the step-by-step evolution of a commercial sale dispute within the court, under the assumptions about the case described above (figure 10.2). The time and cost of resolving the standardized dispute are identified through study of the codes of civil procedure and other court regulations, as well as through questionnaires completed by local litigation lawyers (and, in a quarter of the economies covered by Doing Business, by judges as well). ECONOMY DETAILS Court name: City: City Court of First Instance, Commercial Circuit City Figure 10.2 Time and cost of contract enforcement in and comparator economies Source: Doing Business database.

83 83 Table 10.2 Details on time and cost for enforcing contracts in Indicator Middle East & North Africa average Time (days) Filing and service 26 Trial and judgment 420 Enforcement of judgment 120 Cost (% of claim) Attorney fees (% of claim) 15.0 Court fees (% of claim) 2.6 Enforcement fees (% of claim) 1.0 Source: Doing Business database.

84 84 ENFORCING CONTRACTS Quality of judicial processes index The quality of judicial processes index measures whether each economy has adopted a series of good practices in its court system in four areas: court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The score on the quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the scores on these 4 sub-components. The index ranges from 0 to 18, with higher values indicating more efficient judicial processes. The scores reported here show which of these good practices are available in. This methodology was initially developed by Djankov and others (2003) and is adopted here with several changes. The quality of judicial processes index was introduced in Doing Business The good practices tested in this index were developed on the basis of internationally recognized good practices promoting judicial efficiency. Figure 10.3 Quality of judicial processes index in and comparator economies Source: Doing Business database.

85 85 Table 10.3 Details of the quality of judicial processes index in Answer Score Quality of judicial processes index (0-18) 8.00 Court structure and proceedings (0-5) Is there a court or division of a court dedicated solely to hearing commercial cases? Yes Small claims court a. Is there a small claims court or a fast-track procedure for small claims? 2.b. If yes, is self-representation allowed? Yes Yes 3. Is pretrial attachment available? Yes Are new cases assigned randomly to judges? Yes 0.5 Case management (0-6) Time standards a. Are there laws setting overall time standards for key court events in a civil case? 1.b. If yes, are the time standards set for at least three court events? 1.c. Are these time standards respected in more than 50% of cases? Yes No Yes 2. Adjournments a. Does the law regulate the maximum number of adjournments that can be granted? 2.b. Are adjournments limited to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances? 2.c. If rules on adjournments exist, are they respected in more than 50% of cases? 3. Can two of the following four reports be generated about the competent court: (i) time to disposition report; (ii) clearance rate report; (iii) age of pending cases report; and (iv) single case progress report? 4. Is a pretrial conference among the case management techniques used before the competent court? 5. Are there any electronic case management tools in place within the competent court for use by judges? 6. Are there any electronic case management tools in place within the competent court for use by lawyers? No No n.a. Yes 1.0 No 0.0 No 0.0 No 0.0 Court automation (0-4) 0.0

86 86 1. Can the initial complaint be filed electronically through a dedicated platform within the competent court? 2. Is it possible to carry out service of process electronically for claims filed before the competent court? Answer Score No 0.0 No Can court fees be paid electronically within the competent court? No Publication of judgments a Are judgments rendered in commercial cases at all levels made available to the general public through publication in official gazettes, in newspapers or on the internet or court website? 4.b. Are judgments rendered in commercial cases at the appellate and supreme court level made available to the general public through publication in official gazettes, in newspapers or on the internet or court website? No No Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) Arbitration a. Is domestic commercial arbitration governed by a consolidated law or consolidated chapter or section of the applicable code of civil procedure encompassing substantially all its aspects? 1.b. Are there any commercial disputes aside from those that deal with public order or public policy that cannot be submitted to arbitration? 1.c. Are valid arbitration clauses or agreements usually enforced by the courts? Yes No Yes 2. Mediation/Conciliation a. Is voluntary mediation or conciliation available? 2.b. Are mediation, conciliation or both governed by a consolidated law or consolidated chapter or section of the applicable code of civil procedure encompassing substantially all their aspects? 2.c. Are there financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation or conciliation (i.e., if mediation or conciliation is successful, a refund of court filing fees, income tax credits or the like)? Yes No Yes Source: Doing Business database.

87 87 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY A robust bankruptcy system functions as a filter, ensuring the survival of economically efficient companies and reallocating the resources of inefficient ones. Fast and cheap insolvency proceedings result in the speedy return of businesses to normal operation and increase returns to creditors. By clarifying the expectations of creditors and debtors about the outcome of insolvency proceedings, well-functioning insolvency systems can facilitate access to finance, save more viable businesses and sustainably grow the economy. What do the indicators cover? Doing Business studies the time, cost and outcome of insolvency proceedings involving domestic legal entities. These variables are used to calculate the recovery rate, which is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors through reorganization, liquidation or debt enforcement (foreclosure or receivership) proceedings. To determine the present value of the amount recovered by creditors, Doing Business uses the lending rates from the International Monetary Fund, supplemented with data from central banks and the Economist Intelligence Unit. In addition, Doing Business evaluates the adequacy and integrity of the existing legal framework applicable to liquidation and reorganization proceedings through the strength of insolvency framework index. The index tests whether economies adopted internationally accepted good practices in four areas: commencement of proceedings, management of debtor s assets, reorganization proceedings and creditor participation. The ranking of economies on the ease of resolving insolvency is determined by sorting their distance to frontier scores for resolving insolvency. These scores are the simple average of the distance to frontier scores for the recovery rate and the strength of insolvency framework index. The Resolving Insolvency indicators do not measure insolvency proceedings of individuals and financial institutions. The data are derived from questionnaire responses by local insolvency practitioners and verified through a study of laws and regulations as well as public information on bankruptcy systems. WHAT THE RESOLVING INSOLVENCY INDICATORS MEASURE Time required to recover debt (years) Measured in calendar years Appeals and requests for extension are included Cost required to recover debt (% of debtor s estate) Measured as percentage of estate value Court fees Fees of insolvency administrators Lawyers fees Assessors and auctioneers fees Other related fees Outcome Whether business continues operating as a going concern or business assets are sold piecemeal Recovery rate for creditors Measures the cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors Outcome for the business (survival or not) determines the maximum value that can be recovered Official costs of the insolvency proceedings are deducted Depreciation of furniture is taken into account Present value of debt recovered Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) Sum of the scores of four component indices: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) Management of debtor s assets index (0-6) Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) Creditor participation index (0-4)

88 88 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY Where does the economy stand today? According to data collected by Doing Business, resolving insolvency takes 4.20 years on average and costs 10.00% of the debtor s estate, with the most likely outcome being that the company will be sold as piecemeal sale. The average recovery rate is cents on the dollar. Most indicator sets refer to a case scenario in the largest business city of an economy, except for 11 economies for which the data are a population-weighted average of the 2 largest business cities. Globally, stands at 122 in the ranking of 189 economies on the ease of resolving insolvency (figure 11.1). The resolving insolvency indicators are based on detailed information collected through questionnaires completed by insolvency experts, including lawyers, practitioners (administrators, trustees), accountants and judges. Data on the time, cost and outcome refer to the most likely incourt insolvency procedure applicable under specific case study assumptions. Data on provisions applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization is based on the current law governing insolvency proceedings in each economy. Figure 11.1 How and comparator economies rank on the ease of resolving insolvency Source: Doing Business database.

89 89 Figure 11.2 Efficiency of proceedings - time, cost and recovery rate in and comparator economies. Source: Doing Business database. Note: The recovery rate is calculated based on the time, cost and outcome of insolvency proceedings involving domestic legal entities and is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors. The calculation takes into account the outcome: whether the business emerges from the proceedings as a going concern or the assets are sold piecemeal. Then the costs of the proceedings are deducted. Finally, the value lost as a result of the time the money remains tied up in insolvency proceedings is taken into account. The recovery rate is the present value of the remaining proceeds, based on end-2014 lending rates.

90 90 Table 11.1 Details of data on efficiency of insolvency proceedings in Indicator Answer Explanation Proceedin g foreclosure Security documents relating to collateral (Hotel) located in would be enforced before the Court of First Instance. After Mirage's default, BizBank would initiate foreclosure by enforcing its security interest over Mirage's assets. Other unsecured creditors will file petition at the Court attempting to convert the foreclosure proceeding into liquidation which however won't stay BizBank to proceed with actions against the property securing their rights according to Commercial Law Article 597. Outcome piecemeal sale The hotel will stop operating and Mirage assets will be sold piecemeal in a public auction upon the completion of the proceeding. Time (in years) Cost (% of estate) The foreclosure procedure takes approximate 4.2 years until BizBank is repaid some or all of the money owed to it. The delay is largely due to the difficulty in scheduling a court hearing to resolve appeals from relevant parties to BizBank's foreclosure attempt, as well as the preparation and implementation of the auction. It takes at least half a year (probably 8 months) for the Court to review BizBank's initial foreclosure request. If appeals arise from unsecured creditors, the Court will hold hearings and make the decision, which can take up to 3 years. The costs associated with the case would amount to approximately 10% of the value of the debtor's estate. Cost incurred during the entire insolvency process mainly include court or government agency fees (1%), attorney fees (5%), fees of accountants, assessors, inspectors and other professionals (1%), and fees of auctioneers (1%-5%). Recovery rate: Source: Doing Business database.

91 91 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY Strength of resolving insolvency index The strength of insolvency framework index is the sum of the scores on the commencement of proceedings index, management of debtor s assets index, reorganization proceedings index and creditor participation index. The index ranges from 0 to 16, with higher values indicating insolvency legislation that is better designed for rehabilitating viable firms and liquidating nonviable ones. s score on the strength of insolvency framework index is 6.00 out of 16. Figure 11.3 Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in and comparator economies Source: Doing Business database. Note: Even if the economy s legal framework includes provisions related to insolvency proceedings (liquidation or reorganization), the economy receives 0 points for the strength of insolvency framework index, if time, cost and outcome indicators are recorded as no practice.

92 92 Table 11.3 Summary of data for the strength of insolvency framework index in Answer Score Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) 6.00 Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) 2.00 What procedures are available to a DEBTOR when commencing insolvency proceedings? Does the insolvency framework allow a CREDITOR to file for insolvency of the debtor? What basis for commencement of the insolvency proceedings is allowed under the insolvency framework? (b) Debtor may file for liquidation only (b) Yes, but a creditor may file for liquidation only (a) Debtor is generally unable to pay its debts as they mature Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) 3.00 Does the insolvency framework allow the continuation of contracts supplying essential goods and services to the debtor? Does the insolvency framework allow the rejection by the debtor of overly burdensome contracts? Does the insolvency framework allow avoidance of preferential transactions? Does the insolvency framework allow avoidance of undervalued transactions? Does the insolvency framework provide for the possibility of the debtor obtaining credit after commencement of insolvency proceedings? Yes 1.0 No 0.0 Yes 1.0 Yes 1.0 No 0.0 Does the insolvency framework assign priority to post-commencement credit? (c) No priority is assigned to postcommencement creditors 0.0 Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) 0.00 Which creditors vote on the proposed reorganization plan? (c) Other, please specify 0.0 Does the insolvency framework require that dissenting creditors in reorganization receive at least as much as what they would obtain in a liquidation? Are the creditors divided into classes for the purposes of voting on the reorganization plan, does each class vote separately and are creditors in the same class treated equally? No 0.0 No 0.0 Creditor participation index (0-4) 1.00

93 93 Does the insolvency framework require approval by the creditors for selection or appointment of the insolvency representative? Does the insolvency framework require approval by the creditors for sale of substantial assets of the debtor? Does the insolvency framework provide that a creditor has the right to request information from the insolvency representative? Does the insolvency framework provide that a creditor has the right to object to decisions accepting or rejecting creditors' claims? Answer Score No 0.0 No 0.0 No 0.0 Yes 1.0 Source: Doing Business database.

94 94 LABOR MARKET REGULATION Doing Business has historically studied the flexibility of regulation of employment, specifically as it relates to the areas of hiring, working hours and redundancy. This year Doing Business has expanded the scope of the labor market regulation indicators by adding 16 new questions, most of which focus on measuring job quality. Over the period from 2007 to 2011 improvements were made to align the methodology for the labor market regulation indicators (formerly the employing workers indicators) with the letter and spirit of the International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions. Ten of the 189 ILO conventions cover areas now measured by Doing Business (up from four previously): employee termination, weekend work, holiday with pay, night work, protection against unemployment, sickness benefits, maternity protection, working hours, equal remuneration and labor inspections. Between 2009 and 2011 the World Bank Group worked with a consultative group including labor lawyers, employer and employee representatives, and experts from the ILO, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), civil society and the private sector to review the methodology for the labor market regulation indicators and explore future areas of research. A full report with the conclusions of the consultative group, along with the methodology it proposed, is available on the Doing Business website at: regulations as well as secondary sources are reviewed to ensure accuracy. To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about the worker and the business are used. The worker: Is a cashier in a supermarket or grocery store, age 19, with one year of work experience. Is a full-time employee. Is not a member of the labor union, unless membership is mandatory. The business: Is a limited liability company (or the equivalent in the economy). Operates a supermarket or grocery store in the economy s largest business city. For 11 economies the data are also collected for the second largest business city. Has 60 employees. Is subject to collective bargaining agreements if such agreements cover more than 50% of the food retail sector and they apply even to firms that are not party to them. Abides by every law and regulation but does not grant workers more benefits than those mandated by law, regulation or (if applicable) collective bargaining agreements. Doing Business 2016 presents the data for the labor market regulation indicators in an annex. The report does not present rankings of economies on these indicators or include the topic in the aggregate distance to frontier score or ranking on the ease of doing business. Detailed data collected on labor market regulation are available on the Doing Business website ( The data on labor market regulation are based on a detailed questionnaire on employment regulations that is completed by local lawyers and public officials. Employment laws and

95 95 LABOR MARKET REGULATION Employment laws are needed to protect workers from arbitrary or unfair treatment and to ensure efficient contracting between employers and workers. Many economies that changed their labor market regulation in the past 5 years did so in ways that increased labor market flexibility. What changes did adopt that affected the Doing Business indicators on labor market regulation (table 12.1)? Table 12.1 What changes did make in terms of labor market regulation? DB year Reform DB2011 Source: Doing Business database. increased the number of days of paid annual leave and increased the notice period applicable in case of redundancy dismissals.

96 96 LABOR MARKET REGULATION What are the details? The data reported here for are based on a detailed survey of labor market regulation that is completed by local lawyers and public officials. Employment laws and regulations as well as secondary sources are reviewed to ensure accuracy. Hiring Data on hiring cover five areas: (i) whether fixed-term contracts are prohibited for permanent tasks; (ii) the maximum cumulative duration of fixed-term contracts; (iii) the minimum wage for a cashier, age 19, with one year of work experience; (iv) the ratio of the minimum wage to the average value added per worker (the ratio of an economy s GNI per capita to the working-age population as a percentage of the total population), and (v) the availability of incentives for employers to hire employees under the age of 25*. Hiring Fixed-term contracts prohibited for permanent tasks? Data No Maximum length of a single fixed-term contract (months) 60 months (Art. 13) Maximum length of fixed-term contracts, including renewals (months) Minimum wage applicable to the worker assumed in the case study (US$/month) No limit Ratio of minimum wage to value added per worker 0.0 Incentives for employing workers under age 25? No Source: Doing Business database. *A new question introduced in the Doing Business 2016 report for the first time.

97 97 LABOR MARKET REGULATION Working hours Data on working hours cover nine areas: i) the maximum number of working days allowed per week; (ii) the premium for night work (as a percentage of hourly pay); (iii) the premium for work on a weekly rest day (as a percentage of hourly pay); (iv) the premium for overtime work (as a percentage of hourly pay)*; (v) whether there are restrictions on night work; (vi) whether nonpregnant and nonnursing women can work the same night hours as men*; (vii) whether there are restrictions on weekly holiday work; (viii) whether there are restrictions on overtime work*; and (ix) the average paid annual leave for workers with 1 year of tenure, 5 years of tenure, and 10 years of tenure. Working Hours Data Maximum number of working days per week 6.0 Premium for night work (% of hourly pay) 0.0 Premium for work on weekly rest day (% of hourly pay) 50.0 Premium for overtime work (% of hourly pay) 25.0 Restrictions on night work? 0.0 Whether nonpregnant and nonnursing women can work the same night hours as men Restrictions on weekly holiday? 1.0 No Restrictions on overtime work? Yes Paid annual leave for a worker with 1 year of tenure (working days) 30.0 Paid annual leave for a worker with 5 years of tenure (working days) 30.0 Paid annual leave for a worker with 10 years of tenure (working days) 30.0 Paid annual leave (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years of tenure, in working days) 30.0 Source: Doing Business database. *A new question introduced in the Doing Business 2016 report for the first time.

98 98 LABOR MARKET REGULATION Redundancy rules Data on redundancy cover nine areas: (i) the length of the maximum probationary period (in months) for permanent employees; (ii) whether redundancy is allowed as a basis for terminating workers; (iii) whether the employer needs to notify a third party (such as a government agency) to terminate one redundant worker; (iv) whether the employer needs to notify a third party to terminate a group of nine redundant workers; (v) whether the employer needs approval from a third party to terminate one redundant worker; (vi) whether the employer needs approval from a third party to terminate a group of nine redundant workers; (vii) whether the law requires the employer to reassign or retrain a worker before making the worker redundant; (viii) whether priority rules apply for redundancies; and (ix) whether priority rules apply for reemployment. Redundancy rules Data Maximum length of probationary period (months) 3.0 Dismissal due to redundancy allowed by law? Yes Third-party notification if one worker is dismissed? No Third-party approval if one worker is dismissed? No Third-party notification if nine workers are dismissed? No Third-party approval if nine workers are dismissed? No Retraining or reassignment obligation before redundancy? No Priority rules for redundancies? No Priority rules for reemployment? No Source: Doing Business database.

99 99 LABOR MARKET REGULATION Redundancy cost Redundancy cost measures the cost of advance notice requirements and severance payments due when terminating a redundant worker, expressed in weeks of salary. The average value of notice requirements and severance payments applicable to a worker with 1 year of tenure, a worker with 5 years and a worker with 10 years is considered. One month is recorded as 4 and 1/3 weeks. Redundancy cost indicator (in salary weeks) Data Notice period for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 1 year of tenure 13.0 Notice period for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 5 years of tenure 13.0 Notice period for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 10 years of tenure 13.0 Notice period for redundancy dismissal (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years of tenure) Severance pay for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 1 year of tenure 2.1 Severance pay for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 5 years of tenure 10.7 Severance pay for redundancy dismissal for a worker with 10 years of tenure 32.5 Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years of tenure) Source: Doing Business database.

100 100 LABOR MARKET REGULATION Job quality Doing Business 2016 report presents, for the first time, data on 12 job quality areas: (i) whether the law mandates equal remuneration for work of equal value; (ii) whether the law mandates nondiscrimination based on gender in hiring, (iii) whether the law mandates paid or unpaid maternity leave; (iv) the minimum length of maternity leave in calendar days (minimum number of days that legally have to be paid by the government, the employer or both); (v) whether employees on maternity leave receive 100 % of wages; (vi) the availability of five fully paid days of sick leave a year; (vii) the availability of on-the-job training at no cost to the employee; (viii) whether a worker is eligible for an unemployment protection scheme after one year of service; (ix) the minimum duration of the contribution period (in months) required for unemployment protection; (x) whether an employee can create or join a union; (xi) the availability of administrative or judicial relief in case of infringement of employees rights; and (xii) the availability of a labor inspection system. If no maternity leave is mandated by law, parental leave is measured if applicable. Job Quality Data Equal remuneration for work of equal value? No Gender nondiscrimination in hiring? No Paid or unpaid maternity leave mandated by law? Yes Minimum length of maternity leave (calendar days)? 70.0 Receive 100% of wages on maternity leave? Yes Five fully paid days of sick leave a year? Yes On-the-job training? No Unemployment protection after one year of employment? No Minimum contribution period for unemployment protection (months)? n.a. Can employee create or join union? Yes Administrative or judicial relief for infringement of employees' rights? Yes Labor inspection system? Yes Source: Doing Business database.

101 101 DISTANCE TO FRONTIER AND EASE OF DOING BUSINESS RANKING Doing Business presents results for two aggregate measures: the distance to frontier score and the ease of doing business ranking, which is based on the distance to frontier score. The ease of doing business ranking compares economies with one another; the distance to frontier score benchmarks economies with respect to regulatory best practice, showing the absolute distance to the best performance on each Doing Business indicator. When compared across years, the distance to frontier score shows how much the regulatory environment for local entrepreneurs in an economy has changed over time in absolute terms, while the ease of doing business ranking can show only how much the regulatory environment has changed relative to that in other economies. Distance to Frontier The distance to frontier score captures the gap between an economy s performance and a measure of best practice across the entire sample of 36 indicators for 10 Doing Business topics (the labor market regulation indicators are excluded). For starting a business, for example, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and New Zealand have the smallest number of procedures required (1), and New Zealand the shortest time to fulfill them (0.5 days). Slovenia has the lowest cost (0.0), and Australia, Colombia and 103 other economies have no paid-in minimum capital requirement (table 14.1 in the Doing Business 2016 report). Calculation of the distance to frontier score Calculating the distance to frontier score for each economy involves two main steps. In the first step individual component indicators are normalized to a common unit where each of the 36 component indicators y (except for the total tax rate) is rescaled using the linear transformation (worst y)/(worst frontier). In this formulation the frontier represents the best performance on the indicator across all economies since 2005 or the third year in which data for the indicator were collected. Both the best performance and the worst performance are established every five years based on the Doing Business data for the year in which they are established, and remain at that level for the five years regardless of any changes in data in interim years. Thus an economy may set the frontier for an indicator even though it is no longer at the frontier in a subsequent year. For scores such as those on the strength of legal rights index or the quality of land administration index, the frontier is set at the highest possible value. For the total tax rate, consistent with the use of a threshold in calculating the rankings on this indicator, the frontier is defined as the total tax rate at the 15th percentile of the overall distribution for all years included in the analysis up to and including Doing Business For the time to pay taxes the frontier is defined as the lowest time recorded among all economies that levy the three major taxes: profit tax, labor taxes and mandatory contributions, and value added tax (VAT) or sales tax. For the different times to trade across borders, the frontier is defined as 1 hour even though in many economies the time is less than that. In the same formulation, to mitigate the effects of extreme outliers in the distributions of the rescaled data for most component indicators (very few economies need 700 days to complete the procedures to start a business, but many need 9 days), the worst performance is calculated after the removal of outliers. The definition of outliers is based on the distribution for each component indicator. To simplify the process two rules were defined: the 95th percentile is used for the indicators with the most dispersed distributions (including minimum capital, number of payments to pay taxes, and the time and cost indicators), and the 99th percentile is used for number of procedures. No outlier is removed for component indicators bound by definition or construction, including legal index scores (such as the depth of credit information index, extent of conflict of interest regulation index and strength of insolvency framework index) and the recovery rate (figure 14.1). In the second step for calculating the distance to frontier score, the scores obtained for individual indicators for each economy are aggregated through simple averaging into one distance to frontier score, first for each topic and then across all 10 topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. More complex aggregation methods such as principal components and unobserved components yield a ranking nearly

102 102 identical to the simple average used by Doing Business 4. Thus Doing Business uses the simplest method: weighting all topics equally and, within each topic, giving equal weight to each of the topic components 5. An economy s distance to frontier score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst performance and 100 the frontier. All distance to frontier calculations are based on a maximum of five decimals. However, indicator ranking calculations and the ease of doing business ranking calculations are based on two decimals. The difference between an economy s distance to frontier score in any previous year and its score in 2015 illustrates the extent to which the economy has closed the gap to the regulatory frontier over time. And in any given year the score measures how far an economy is from the best performance at that time. Treatment of the total tax rate The total tax rate component of the paying taxes indicator set enters the distance to frontier calculation in a different way than any other indicator. The distance to frontier score obtained for the total tax rate is transformed in a nonlinear fashion before it enters the distance to frontier score for paying taxes. As a result of the nonlinear transformation, an increase in the total tax rate has a smaller impact on the distance to frontier score for the total tax rate and therefore on the distance to frontier score for paying taxes for economies with a below-average total tax rate than it would have had before this approach was adopted in Doing Business 2015 (line B is smaller than line A in figure 14.2 of the Doing Business 2016 report). And for economies with an extreme total tax rate (a rate that is very high relative to the average), an increase has a greater impact on both these distance to frontier scores than it would have had before (line D is bigger than line C in figure 14.2 of the Doing Business 2016 report). The nonlinear transformation is not based on any economic theory of an optimal tax rate that minimizes distortions or maximizes efficiency in an economy s overall tax system. Instead, it is mainly empirical in nature. The nonlinear transformation along with the threshold reduces the bias in the indicator toward economies that do not need to levy significant taxes on companies like the Doing Business standardized case study company because they raise public revenue in other ways for example, through taxes on foreign companies, through taxes on sectors other than manufacturing or from natural resources (all of which are outside the scope of the methodology). In addition, it acknowledges the need of economies to collect taxes from firms. Calculation of scores for economies with 2 cities covered For each of the 11 economies in which Doing Business collects data for the second largest business city as well as the largest one, the distance to frontier score is calculated as the population-weighted average of the distance to frontier scores for these two cities (table 13.1). This is done for the aggregate score, the scores for each topic and the scores for all the component indicators for each topic. 4 See Djankov, Manraj and others (2005). Principal components and unobserved components methods yield a ranking nearly identical to that from the simple average method because both these methods assign roughly equal weights to the topics, since the pairwise correlations among indicators do not differ much. An alternative to the simple average method is to give different weights to the topics, depending on which are considered of more or less importance in the context of a specific economy. 5 For getting credit, indicators are weighted proportionally, according to their contribution to the total score, with a weight of 60% assigned to the strength of legal rights index and 40% to the depth of credit information index. Indicators for all other topics are assigned equal weights

103 103 Table 13.1 Weights used in calculating the distance to frontier scores for economies with 2 cities covered Economy City Weight (%) Bangladesh Brazil China India Indonesia Japan Mexico Nigeria Pakistan Russian Federation United States Dhaka 78 Chittagong 22 São Paulo 61 Rio de Janeiro 39 Shanghai 55 Beijing 45 Mumbai 47 Delhi 53 Jakarta 78 Surabaya 22 Tokyo 65 Osaka 35 Mexico City 83 Monterrey 17 Lagos 77 Kano 23 Karachi 65 Lahore 35 Moscow 70 St. Petersburg 30 New York 60 Los Angeles 40 Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Urbanization Prospects, 2014 Revision. ROM/Default.aspx. Economies that improved the most across 3 or more Doing Business topics in 2014/15 Doing Business 2016 uses a simple method to calculate which economies improved the ease of doing business the most. First, it selects the economies that in 2014/15 implemented regulatory reforms making it easier to do business in 3 or more of the 10 topics included in this year s aggregate distance to frontier score. Changes making it more difficult to do business are subtracted from the total number of those making it easier to do business. Twenty-four economies meet this criterion: Armenia; Azerbaijan; Benin; Costa Rica; Côte d Ivoire; Cyprus; Hong Kong SAR, China; Indonesia; Jamaica; Kazakhstan; Kenya; Lithuania; Madagascar; Mauritania; Morocco; Romania; the Russian Federation; Rwanda; Senegal; Togo; Uganda; the United Arab Emirates; Uzbekistan; and Vietnam. Second, Doing Business sorts these economies on the increase in their distance to frontier score from the previous year using comparable data. Selecting the economies that implemented regulatory reforms in at least three topics and had the biggest improvements in their distance to frontier scores is intended to highlight economies with ongoing, broadbased reform programs. The improvement in the distance to frontier score is used to identify the top improvers because this allows a focus on the absolute improvement in contrast with the relative improvement shown by a change in rankings that economies have made in their regulatory environment for business. Ease of Doing Business ranking The ease of doing business ranking ranges from 1 to 189. The ranking of economies is determined by sorting the aggregate distance to frontier scores, rounded to 2 decimals.

104 104

105 105 RESOURCES ON THE DOING BUSINESS WEBSITE Current features News on the Doing Business project Rankings How economies rank from 1 to Data All the data for 189 economies topic rankings, indicator values, lists of regulatory procedures and details underlying indicators Reports Access to Doing Business reports as well as subnational and regional reports, case studies and customized economy and regional profiles Methodology The methodologies and research papers underlying Doing Business Research Abstracts of papers on Doing Business topics and related policy issues Law library Online collection of business laws and regulations relating to business Contributors More than 11,400 specialists in 189 economies who participate in Doing Business Entrepreneurship data Data on business density (number of newly registered companies per 1,000 working-age people) for 136 economies repreneurship Distance to frontier Data benchmarking 189 economies to the frontier in regulatory practice and a distance to frontier calculator Information on good practices Showing where the many good practices identified by Doing Business have been adopted Doing Business reforms Short summaries of DB2016 business regulation reforms and lists of reforms since DB Historical data Customized data sets since DB2004

Public Disclosure Authorized Doing Business 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2 2016 The International Bank for Reconstruction

Public Disclosure Authorized Doing Business 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2 2016 The International Bank for Reconstruction

Doing business in PREFACE This is one of a series of guides published annually by the World Bank as part of its Doing Business project. Doing Business is intended to shed light on how easy or difficult

Public Disclosure Authorized Doing Business 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2 2016 The International Bank for Reconstruction

Public Disclosure Authorized Doing Business 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2 2016 The International Bank for Reconstruction

Doing business in PREFACE This is one of a series of guides published annually by the World Bank as part of its Doing Business project. Doing Business is intended to shed light on how easy or difficult

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile: 2 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The

Public Disclosure Authorized Doing Business 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2 2016 The International Bank for Reconstruction

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile: 2 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile: Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile: 2 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Regional Profile: OECD High Income 2012 The International Bank for Reconstruction and

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Regional Profile: OECD High Income Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile: 2 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The

Doing Business 2016 Data notes The indicators presented and analyzed in Doing Business measure business regulation and the protection of property rights and their effect on businesses, especially small

Regional Profile: Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) 2012 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone 202-473-1000

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile: Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 2 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economy Profile: 2 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The

Doing Business 2018 Data Notes The indicators presented and analyzed in Doing Business measure business regulation and the protection of property rights and their effect on businesses, especially small

Region Pro le of Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Doing Business 2018 Indicators (in order of appearance in the document) Starting a business Dealing with construction permits Getting electricity Registering

Region Pro le of Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) Doing Business 2018 Indicators (in order of appearance in the document) Starting a business Dealing with construction permits Getting electricity Registering

Region Pro le of European Union (EU) Doing Business 2018 Indicators (in order of appearance in the document) Starting a business Dealing with construction permits Getting electricity Registering property

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Hong Kong SAR, China 2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /