Wikeleaks release 36

So, since the election is over (looks around surreptitiously) and these leaks can no longer influence said election, I guess these posts will now go
in to the Breaking Political News forum, eh?

Looks like I was right yesterday morning when I said:

I don't think the election is going to stop the release of information from Wikileaks no matter which way the cookie crumbles.

The count now stands at: (58660 results, viewing 1 to 200)

"Why bother?" You may certainly ask that question, I will excerpt from Julian's announcement yesterday for the answer:

On the eve of the election, it is important to restate why we have published what we have.

The right to receive and impart true information is the guiding principle of WikiLeaks – an organization that has a staff and organizational mission
far beyond myself. Our organization defends the public’s right to be informed.

This is why, irrespective of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election, the real victor is the US public which is better informed as a result
of our work.

Wikileaks mission is to inform the public and that information will continue to flow to us, the public, so that we may choose to educate ourselves
about those who would run our world from the shadows.

So, without further ado, I present this excerpt for your consideration:

I will say this, the types of things that are implied by those pushing the 'secret code,' aspect of the emails does in fact happen on a daily basis,
sorry to say.

And they do happen among the people in circles in which the Clintons et al run.

Whether or not they or anyone directly involved with them participate in these activities is an open question worth considering.

I've read through more of these emails than I can recall and in regards to the oddity of the phrases being discussed, I do believe that some of the
examples do indeed carry other meanings than what would normally be applied to them. Whether or not that meaning is what some are alleging is
certainly debatable, but I do think that something other than the obvious is being discussed in some form or fashion.

More media collusion:

/podesta-emails/emailid/59051

Not that any of it matters any more, unless prosecutions are forthcoming...

I was listening to Mr. Jones last night and he spoke about this. It was said this particular, ongoing release will continue into December and on
December 25th there is supposed to be an extra-special release. I will remember that statement and be looking for it.

I appreciate your effort to pull all of these links together so... thank you!

I want to state: We have never been about "Destroying" a Candidate, we Oppose all corruptions and Hierarchies from all "Political Parties" we Have not
and Do not endorse anyone person, as we will oppose Both, we have been about Transparency and Information to the People, what you do with that
information is on you.

To those that say we have done nothing, Think of Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange, people like Seth Roberts and countless unheralded individuals
risking our life

"We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us."

These threads should prove invaluable for decades to come,
an inside look into the twisted inner workings of some
top lifer operatives in Washington.

These leaks not only shed a light on Clinton, Podesta
worked for Barack Obama and Tony Podesta is still
very much entrenched in the lobbying front of the Democratic
playbook. If anyone cares to end corruption in politics,
these threads are the holy grail.

The DNC leaks no less, 5 operatives out of leadership.

I'll take a moment to say that Donna Brazile should be
ashamed of her lack of ethical backbone.

She needs to go! Hopefully, she can still be sunk,
down with her just as Hillary - off the scene of politics forever.

I posted this morning amidst all the happenings in the world and while enduring personal hardship, so I must beg forgiveness for that typo.

Regards other items of interest which have been mentioned and as anon said above:

At the same time, we cannot publish what we do not have. To date, we have not received information on Donald Trump’s campaign, or Jill Stein’s
campaign, or Gary Johnson’s campaign or any of the other candidates that fufills our stated editorial criteria.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.