If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Most of what's posted in these threads seems to be suggestions as to acquisitions that would make the Raiders a better team. Then there are tons of replies that cut down any idea, trade, signing, etc. If Reggie Bush, for example, isn't a player that would help make the Raiders better offensively, then what move should this organization make in order for that to happen? Anything Raider fans can collectively agree upon? I assume all Raider fans have good intentions and want this team to succeed, but where does it all begin for the team and us as fans?

STORK said it best he is unproductive Cap weight id rather spend 12 mil / 16 games for Bush than 8 million for less than 8 games for McFadden. SOMEONE will give a 3rd round for him and we can use the 2 3rds on a gaurd and a CB

We`re loaded with not worth it players, this franchise has gone in a direction I`ve never imagined possible.

Reggie isn`t gonna fix this mess, he`ll be sitting up in the sky box the next 5 years as Oakland retreats 20 more years. My friends we are in big trouble, this is why Al hid Mark Davis from the world, he made a bad choice you mark my words.

The Packers were once a mediocre team, at best, from the 1970s through the 1980s. Look at their history: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/. Every team has their struggle years; it's inevitable. If you visit the website I just listed you'll notice much better overall records since McKenzie became a scout in 1994 and moved up the ranks as the Packers' director of player personnel and the team's director of football operations. Reggie made a positive impact on that organization due to his ability to spot and sign talent. During Reggie’s time in Green Bay, there were only two seasons where the Packers had more losses than wins, and two 8-8 records. If the goal for the Raiders is to have continuity, consistency, and successful seasons, then how is Reggie not the right guy for the Raiders' GM job? He’ll restore this franchise and make them a contender again. Look at the last 20 years when Reggie was with the Packers: there were only 4 head coaches as opposed to Al Davis' 10 head coaches in Oakland’s last decade.

If there is neither consistency nor continuity in the head coach position, then erratic and unsuccessful seasons will be the result due to lack of time for any coach to implement their scheme. Don't find this to be true? Look at the last 10 years for the Raiders. Al Davis wanted things done his way. Unfortunately, he thought his way was the only and best way. He held the Raiders back from achieving success ever since he traded Gruden because he wouldn’t tolerate Al’s micromanaging methods and stronghold grip. Who replaces a coach that never had anything worse than two 8-8 records along with a 10-6 and 12-4 record in the span of 4 years? Al Davis. Your argument is mere speculation with no validity. If Reggie's impact in Green Bay isn't enough proof, then you're the lone wolf in this thread. There's every reason to believe and have faith in Reggie & Co.

Bernard most likely will be a 2nd rounder. Considering alot of boards have him at the top of the RB prospect list. Talented, but we need defense bad. We can find a serviceable RB later that can run in this scheme. I am not a big fan cuz some say he is 200 lbs and some say 205. We have a guy on this team who is 200 lbs and is faster(TJ).