* On Tue Jul 18, 2006 at 10:18:14AM +0100, Simon Kenyon wrote:
> > Next time please update the ticket so we'll know it can be closed.
> i did
> please have a look at the comments i added back in march and tell me
> what i did wrong
> so that i can be more useful to the myth community with my bug resports
Your next-to-last comment from the ticket:
> this change has made a dramatic effect on the stability of my
> frontend/backend. i will recompile qt on my other backend and my various
> frontends and report back.
> but for now i think this is worth further investigation.
> if qt 4.1 were supported my myth then it would not require me to hack
> the qt build.
And your last entry:
> i've been just looking at the code and in particular the comments in
> changeset 5683 it suggests that particular combinations of mysql/qt
> will crash if a connection is closed and reopened. have a look at the
> comments in mythdbcon.h however, changset 8856 to mythdbcon.cpp seems
> to do exactly that this was added a month ago (9 days before 0.19 was
> released) - so maybe that is something to look at.
So you used phrases like "further investigation", "require me to hack the
qt build", and "something to look at" and you mention changesets that
were made prior to 0.19 like you're saying it was broken just before
the release. You never really say anything like "I recompiled and it
works now."
Maybe I didn't read into it enough. Anyway, glad it's working for you now.
--
Chris