(05-31-2013, 02:03 AM)JayRodney Wrote: Told a congressional committee that, the ATTORNEY GENERAL apparently just misunderstood the phrase under oath.
I wonder what would happen to me if I lied under oath.

He didn't say "He" misunderstood, he said the Office of the Attorney General did.

A corporation cannot be prosecuted for crimes. Only individuals who had knowledge of the crime.

(05-31-2013, 02:03 AM)JayRodney Wrote: Told a congressional committee that, the ATTORNEY GENERAL apparently just misunderstood the phrase under oath.
I wonder what would happen to me if I lied under oath.

He didn't say "He" misunderstood, he said the Office of the Attorney General did.

A corporation cannot be prosecuted for crimes. Only individuals who had knowledge of the crime.

Is he not the main human representation of that office? If you get away with "LOL IDK" on that post maybe the people who hired him are to blame. Because seriously, who hires an idiot?!

(05-31-2013, 02:03 AM)JayRodney Wrote: Told a congressional committee that, the ATTORNEY GENERAL apparently just misunderstood the phrase under oath.
I wonder what would happen to me if I lied under oath.

He didn't say "He" misunderstood, he said the Office of the Attorney General did.

A corporation cannot be prosecuted for crimes. Only individuals who had knowledge of the crime.

Is he not the main human representation of that office? If you get away with "LOL IDK" on that post maybe the people who hired him are to blame. Because seriously, who hires an idiot?!

No wait, that was a rhetorical question

Yes, but by placing blame on the office, he may not get prosecuted if he claims "HE" had no knowledge of the act.

It's an illusion. The difference between a private person and a corporation, since the Govts. of the world can only deal with you as a Corporation. they cannot do business with a flesh and blood human being without consent.