We had one here a while back, a king. Got a bit uppity and out of order, so we chopped the bugger's head off.

The French did something similar a little over 200 years ago, but they did their beheading wholesale.

I sometimes think we should have done a few more while the axe was still sharp.

But the possiblity of a population uprising is always present, and that's what scares people like Bush and co. so much.

There's a reason that education systems are proving to be rubbish, and governments are lowering pass grades. That is to keep the people stupid. A stupid population is far easier to control than an educated one.

Nemo, I would not kill you, but the only thing I would ask is to gubr:

Might you change the title name to: forum post number 1000000045 of unhappy humans against evil politicians, rich humans, pandas, etc..

Listen, do you really think that posting on the internet will make something different? I highly doubt so. For the ideas, there will NEVER have anywhere a perfect living place, where everyone is happy, have enought things, etc..

The only few things I would say is that I think that humans are not meant to live into towns villages, or too complex ubran area. I'm myself often feeling oppressed in a ubran area, while in a more 'natural' area, you feel better. I suppose humans should never tried to group themselves too much.

Besides, for peace, I hope there will never have one that would last. Killing is not nice, but if not enought humans die, what do you get? Surpopulation. There need to have a natural selection, if not, what are you going to do? Live into the group, or, into the sky?.. The zone is a good example of reducing demographics.

controlling birth rate is a bit more reasonable way of controlling the number of ppl... don't you think? Wars are not only wasting unaware or their pathetic position ppl but also enormous amounts of resources which are at least in nowadays not unlimited...

"Basicly, kind of a big deal(...)Grass grows, birds fly, sun shines, and brother, I hurt people(...) If you were from where I was from, you would be fu**ing DEAD, WOO-O!"

Well nemo, think about it.I think that the most possible thing is that some armed forces, or paramilitary armed forces start to riot, or rebel. During a long time, soldiers were well payed, and had most of the time advantages, if ever there is a huge problem on that.. then.. there will have wars, or civil wars.

And I doubt you can stop violence by saying that it would be better to control birth rate to reduce surpopulation.

Also, you might have misinterpret my point of view on "war", for war, I mean that human show directly the fact that they like another one, or not. I don't mean precisly armed forced, but use of force between human.

At last, I would say, if I am wrong, why the best seeked videos games, books , movies etc... etc.. are mostly related to violence? It's a basic instinct. It would be the same than pornography, which can be seen in the same way. Internet is a exellent example to prove my words.

Yes, violence for humans is a natural thing. We have had to be at one with nature and join in with the 'red in tooth and claw' stuff.

But we also have consciousness and intelligence. Weapons we can use in the fight against those violent instincts.

Not too long ago was the big fuss over 'video nasties', triggered by someone murdering someone else then blaming it on having seen a horror movie.

Well, maybe. Maybe not.

But how many murderers were kept from their evil deeds by having watched that same movie, and others such, during the times when they could have been on the streets with homicidal intentions?

The same can be said of computer games. A lot of aggression is poured into defeating non-existent enemies on computer screens instead of into street violence and muggings.

And it isn't really population shrinkage that was the point. Control is the main target, and the more that can be controlled, the more work is done, the more wealth is produced for the NWO. Basic slavery.