Speed Racer was just fun stuff, it wasn't trying to be over the top with its message. V for Vendetta barely counts as a Wachowski movie, as McTeigue directed it and it was from a graphic novel anyway. Still was a bit full of itself, too.

Went and saw The Master last night. Sexy as ****. I love seeing how insane people operate n Phoenix n Hoffman both did an incredible job of portraying that. Even Adams was very convincing in her role. You're right about the lack of a plot Brody but I still loved it regardless of that. That part where Joaquin was going back and forth across the room was just fantastic.

Pretty much every film with any sort of message is full of itself. If it's not oppressive to the story it's only a problem if you're an asshole, nothing I've seen from them/in trailers leads me to believe it's going to be Crash-bad message wise, to the point where it actually detracts from the story or purty visuals. Or do you ***** about Casablanca, Clockwork Orange, Pi, City of God, Wag the Dog, Z, motherfuckin every great movie ever, being too full of itself to?

__________________
BK

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcheTen

JPP is a better and more productive player than Brandon Graham

Quote:

Originally Posted by abaddon41_80

Is Shaun Hill a top 10 QB? Definitely not. Is he a top 20 one? Almost certainly.

Damn. A reboot for Fantastic Four by Fox is happening. Of course they wouldn't let those rights get away.

Quote:

A 'Fantastic Four' reboot has been confirmed by Fox creative consultant Mark Millar, who insists director Josh Trank will be staying true to Stan Lee and Jack Kirby's original comics when he helms the movie.

A 'Fantastic Four' reboot has been confirmed.

Fox creative consultant Mark Millar revealed a remake of the Marvel comic book movie will stay true to Stan Lee and Jack Kirby's original comics, and insists he has complete faith in 'Chronicle' director Josh Trank to ensure he doesn't detract too much from the original material when he helms the film.

He said: ''You can tell from 'Chronicle' that it was a new way of looking at superheroes, and I think he's going to apply that same slightly skewed way of looking at heroes to the 'Fantastic Four', but do it in a way that feels incredibly reverential to the Kirby and Lee stuff.''

But Mark has warned fans of the franchise - which saw Jessica Alba, Kerry Washington and Chris Evans star in 2005's action film 'Fantastic Four' - not to expect a ''grim and gritty'' production in the same style as some of the more recent superhero movies.

He added to SFX magazine: ''I don't think you could do 'Fantastic Four' and try and make it grim and gritty.''

I really, really hated the new spiderman. And would like Fox to lose those rights so we could see these characters in Marvels universe in future projects.

Yeah I watched it on the plane last week and thought it was awful. Just a completely unnecessary remake that brought nothing new to the table. As much as I enjoy Rhys Ifans, he's not a villain, and Garfield was just sort of...there.

Is anyone actually upset that the Fantastic 4 won't be rejoining Marvel? I'm not. They kind of suck, even in the comics.

And that Iron Man 3 trailer was all sorts of interesting. Shane Black is the man.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Goosemahn

The APS is strong in this one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by killxswitch

Tears for Fears is better than whatever it is you happen to be thinking about right now.

Yeah I watched it on the plane last week and thought it was awful. Just a completely unnecessary remake that brought nothing new to the table. As much as I enjoy Rhys Ifans, he's not a villain, and Garfield was just sort of...there.

Is anyone actually upset that the Fantastic 4 won't be rejoining Marvel? I'm not. They kind of suck, even in the comics.

And that Iron Man 3 trailer was all sorts of interesting. Shane Black is the man.

The development of any storyline or character was non existent in the new spiderman.

Interesting you feel that way. I thought the movie was at least better than the first Spiderman released in 2001. Especially with the depiction of Peter Parker, which seemed a lot better than it was done back then. The same with Uncle Ben's death. A lot better played out.

Interesting you feel that way. I thought the movie was at least better than the first Spiderman released in 2001. Especially with the depiction of Peter Parker, which seemed a lot better than it was done back then. The same with Uncle Ben's death. A lot better played out.

I do really like Garfield alot, and think he could even be a better fit for Parker than Toby was. But his character development was just so ehhhh. He went from chasing down and ruthlesly looking for his Uncle's killer to all of a sudden just stopping for no real reason. We got more conclusion to that whole storyline in like the first half hour of the first spiderman than we did in the whole movie of the reboot. Plus, why bring up this whole storyline of his parents being involved in something super top secret but barely do anything with it. Sure they are going to focus on that aspect more in the sequels but it just made no sense the way they went about it.

Also don't even get me started on the god damn Lizard.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by WMD

Jesse realizing Walt was Santa Claus could really shake things up.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gpngc

I don't know how old you are, but if you can get to 24/25 without getting arrested or killed, you've done well for yourself lol.