originally posted by: whatnext21
This relating the 'whatever' to this woman being on her period is a very literal rather than figurative response by the PC crowd. This phrase was
around long before Trump offended every woman on US soil.
There was a song written by Bob Dillon that has the phrase 'blood in eyes'. It means: anger toward someone that one would want to see harm come to
them, not bleeding from whereever. He is guilty of a poor choice of words. He should have said daggers, not blood or he should have Google instead
of twitting.
'

Right he should have said daggers, and he didn't say where the blood was coming from everyone assumed.

As I have mentioned elsewhere, I think Trump has been a bit exposed. It's one thing to talk a foul-mouthed game with substance to back you up. Patton
was a good example, although there is suspicion that he might have been bumped off. Winston Churchill would be another.

However, I have seen little of substance from Trump that I would expect to see from a candidate and plenty of foul.

So far, all I see is plenty of angry Internet comment and no real substance to balance it. I can forgive a good deal in terms of lack of polish if I
can feel assured the person in question is actually a darn good leader and effective. I've seen nothing to re-assure me.

What if the "News Bimbo" were an intelligent brunette instead, could she then decide the candidate for you? Or are we using made up words that don't
mean anything in the real world to score points against somebody that you don't like because she has ideas that go beyond agreeing with and fellating
you (which sounds rather unlike these mythical mindless toy blondes that you sometimes hear about from chauvanists by the way).

You do realize that she was HIRED to ask these guys contentious and often BS-based political questions and that everyone was practicing in advance for
exactly that right? It wasn't unfair. Stuff like this is gonna happen to Trump if he becomes president, and he has now shown that he will not be able
to respond with composure and reason. He will make America look stupid and weak with his lightweight emotional issues the first time he sits down
across the table from Putin and gets asked a loaded question.

originally posted by: AlexJowls
Misogynism is a veritable job description prerequisite to becoming rich in today's world. Just do the math on how many boardroom heads are female,
compared to male, and you'll see how phallocentric society is. The ironical offshoot is, this very insular attitude is what has given rise to SJW's
and 'feminazi' movements -- something that adds further fuel to the she-hate fire.

The filter-less Donald Duck trumpeting such sentiments is merely a peek through the looking glass into the historical disdain for the weaker sex that
still underpins society today.

NB: The mere act of poking one's pecker into a warm hole and calling it "hetero" =/= respect for women.

There is no such thing as Misogyny really. It' only a term cooked up by jealous, hateful feminists who blame all men for their shortcomings. With
all of the ignorant things feminists have been plastering the internet with lately, it's a safe bet to say that the government/media is really behind
the movement of feminism, because feminists have proven well, that they are not smart enough, not organized enough, and waaaaay to emotionally
imbalanced to spearhead a movement, that would be anything but laughable.

originally posted by: AlexJowls
Misogynism is a veritable job description prerequisite to becoming rich in today's world. Just do the math on how many boardroom heads are female,
compared to male, and you'll see how phallocentric society is. The ironical offshoot is, this very insular attitude is what has given rise to SJW's
and 'feminazi' movements -- something that adds further fuel to the she-hate fire.

The filter-less Donald Duck trumpeting such sentiments is merely a peek through the looking glass into the historical disdain for the weaker sex that
still underpins society today.

NB: The mere act of poking one's pecker into a warm hole and calling it "hetero" =/= respect for women.

I work in a call center and there are 15 female managers and only 4 male managers on the floor, many more female managers all the way to the top...in
fact the VP is even a female. In 4 years, I have seen females promoted to all kinds of different positions....we still have the same 4 male managers
that were there when I started working there. In fact, one of the male managers is actually the fiance' of one of the female managers (she's actually
referred to as "acting technical manager") as she is also my boss.....and she doesn't know jack $*it compared to all of the guys on our team. We
actually have to teach her everything she knows as we go along. I recall a recent article about how Taylor Swift was complaining about how men have
held her back and that she just because a feminist. I think I see how this works. Feminists complain about not getting opportunities, and that men get
everything, however the reality is that the media helps feminists basically just piss on the backs of everyone, and then tell them it's raining. I am
sure Taylor Swift is really suffering. Yeah...misogyny is a big problem. Here is a list of the top 100 Forbes women (many who call themselves
feminists). I see feminism as nothing more than grown women who are spoiled by the government, just as a mother would spoil a child. Buy them a BMW
car....and they complain about the color or the lack of amenities.

Stop making up for your shortcomings. Women are winning in the market place. Be a Republican and suck it up.

I have no idea what you're talking about. I was not complaining or alluding to any perceived shortcomings that your overactive imagination cooked up.
I was describing feminists....those who say they suffer from misogyny, while the proof all around us tells a different story. You said "Women are
winning in the marketplace"...if this is true, (which it is, because of the sheer amount of support groups, government assistance and child support
cases that contribute to an over 70% divorce rate, where women are awarded everything a man owns), if this is true...then why is there still a
feminist movement and all this talk about misogyny and how women are underpaid? BTW....I will not be a Republican or a Democrat, they are both
brainless automatons.

Here is the real reason why we still have a feminist movement, while you say they are already winning the game.

as she is also my boss.....and she doesn't know jack $*it compared to all of the guys on our team. We actually have to teach her everything she
knows as we go along.

Your boss is your boss because she's better than you and you are the one who wants to whine and make excuses and complain that you want what somebody
else has. I'm sure you're a good white collar republican but you sound like some homeless kid from Berkley.

Of course your workplace is not the entire world and does nothing to disprove that women are at a disadvantage. It just proves you're that much less
competitive in a free market, that you can't boss her around even in a country where it a candidate for president enjoys support for answering a
serious political question with "bleed out your whatever" as if he got in a school yard fight with a girl the same day he got the sex talk.

Edit to add: (see how that works?) Rather than spam on a third post I will add an explicit explanation here that when I said women were winning I was
referring to your workplace and not the big picture. I was turning your BS around on you, not accepting it as fact. If you didn't get that... well...
it's the mark of a great mind to be able to entertain an idea without accepting it.

If you are going to keep editing your posts after the fact it is common courtesy to label the "edit to add" section.

By the way, I can get a girl to hold a sign that says you are the leader of the national organization for women, and then I can photoshop it to say
you also have sexual shortcomings, but it wouldn't prove a thing.

OP you must be a feminist by that logic.Had it been a male id doubt you would be here bitching and moaning. Megan Kellys blatant attacks on The Don
go ignored. But please continue , the more you attack him the more support he gets. Keep on keeping on with the MSN narrative. You only galvanize the
trumpster.

And he may speak before he thinks like Joe Biden but at least he makes no apology and reads from a teleprompter.

as she is also my boss.....and she doesn't know jack $*it compared to all of the guys on our team. We actually have to teach her everything she
knows as we go along.

Your boss is your boss because she's better than you and you are the one who wants to whine and make excuses and complain that you want what somebody
else has. I'm sure you're a good white collar republican but you sound like some homeless kid from Berkley.

Of course your workplace is not the entire world and does nothing to disprove that women are at a disadvantage. It just proves you're that much less
competitive in a free market, that you can't boss her around even in a country where it a candidate for president enjoys support for answering a
serious political question with "bleed out your whatever" as if he got in a school yard fight with a girl the same day he got the sex talk.

Edit to add: (see how that works?) Rather than spam on a third post I will add an explicit explanation here that when I said women were winning I was
referring to your workplace and not the big picture. I was turning your BS around on you, not accepting it as fact. If you didn't get that... well...
it's the mark of a great mind to be able to entertain an idea without accepting it.

Of course your workplace is not the entire world and does nothing to disprove that women are at a disadvantage.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.