Having said that, I think it would be a waste given the depth on the DL the browns would have.

I also don't know how athletic he is since I havnt watched him. Kam, cold you update me on him quickly?

If he's more wilfork than Suh, and we drafted him, id say we may be better off rnning a 2 gap 34. BB thought it was worth 3 first rounders to run it, and that worked well for him.

Hey I was just trying think outside the box. I have seen a lot of Ngata comparisons made about star for what it's worth. I have also scene him ranked the top DT forever and the top DL in the draft a lot.

Joeckel, Geno will go before us. Hopefully some other randoms as well.

I'm still not convinced that we go to a 3-4 though.

SD isn't letting what's his name leave for Cleveland. I think Tucker is the front runner and will PROBABLY run the 4-3.

At least i'm praying

I tell you what if they did draft Star just about any linebacking core would effective with those guys in front of them. _________________The Dawgpounds new three headed monster!
Adopt a Brown: QB Brandon Weeden
247/433 57% 2820yds 6.5avg 13 TD 15 Int

Having said that, I think it would be a waste given the depth on the DL the browns would have.

I also don't know how athletic he is since I havnt watched him. Kam, cold you update me on him quickly?

If he's more wilfork than Suh, and we drafted him, id say we may be better off rnning a 2 gap 34. BB thought it was worth 3 first rounders to run it, and that worked well for him.

Sorry I can't. Like you I haven't watched any DTs. Even when Utah was on and I had no one else to watch I was watching Joe Kruger. I will say in all the games I have watched he never once made a pop the way Ngata and Suh did in college the guys he is compared to most often._________________

nugpimpenJoined: 18 Feb 2006Posts: 28099Location: 10 Miles South of Cleveland

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:15 pm Post subject:

KamTrus20 wrote:

bulldog wrote:

To be completly honest, I havnt watched much of star.

DT is so low of a need for us I've never paid attention.

Having said that, I think it would be a waste given the depth on the DL the browns would have.

I also don't know how athletic he is since I havnt watched him. Kam, cold you update me on him quickly?

If he's more wilfork than Suh, and we drafted him, id say we may be better off rnning a 2 gap 34. BB thought it was worth 3 first rounders to run it, and that worked well for him.

Sorry I can't. Like you I haven't watched any DTs. Even when Utah was on and I had no one else to watch I was watching Joe Kruger. I will say in all the games I have watched he never once made a pop the way Ngata and Suh did in college the guys he is compared to most often.

If Star is there and we're switching to a 34 I'm hoping to trade down and try to get a first to get a OLB like Dion Jordan and a 2nd to get a CB\FS like David Amerson. Our D-line looks great to be put in a 34 only question is really if Sheard can cover and I think he'll be able to with the way Belicheck wanted him coming out of Pitt.

I still feel like OLB would be the biggest need. I like star, but the position he plays isn't exactly a huge need of ours. Obviously you can't have enough good DLmen, but we need a pass rusher badly. I think they'd be foolish to go with a DT