Section I: Steps Taken to Apply the Presumption of Openness

Please answer the following questions in order to describe the steps your agency has taken to ensure that the presumption of openness is being applied to all decisions involving the FOIA. You may also include any additional information that
illustrates how your agency is working to apply the presumption of openness.

FOIA Training:

1. Did your agency conduct FOIA training during the reporting period for FOIA professionals?

Training can include holding an agency-wide FOIA conference, holding a seminar on a particular FOIA topic, or providing training to FOIA or agency staff during a staff meeting, among other types of training.

The training provided here should be substantive and should cover the application of the law and policy. Conversely, your agency's efforts to provide training on the use of technology or IT tools (such as case management systems) that assist in
the processing of requests should be addressed below in response to Question 4 of Section IV of your Chief FOIA Officer Report.

Yes.

2. If yes, please provide a brief description of the type of training conducted and the topics covered.

In August and September 2015, the EEOC conducted in person FOIA training for all agency FOIA coordinators and processing professionals. The EEOC also conducted training via video conference on May 20, 2015 for all FOIA Disclosure Coordinators and
FOIA Specialists. On November 17, 2015, new FOIA personnel received training via video conference on all exemptions utilized by the EEOC. Topics included exemptions (b)(3)(A)(i), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7)(A) and (b)(7)(C).

3. If no, please explain why your agency did not hold training during the reporting period, such as if training offered by other agencies was sufficient for your agency's training needs.

Not applicable.

4. Did your FOIA professionals attend any FOIA training or conference during the reporting period such as that provided by the Department of Justice?

Such training or events can include offerings from OIP, your own agency or another agency or organization.

Yes. EEOC's Headquarters FOIA staff attended FOIA training and conferences provided by the Department of Justice in addition to in-house training provided by the EEOC. Courses attended include: FOIA for Attorneys and Access Professionals,
Introduction to the FOIA, FOIA Litigation Seminar, Continuing FOIA Education and Best Practices: Customer Service and Dispute Resolution.

5. Provide an estimate of the percentage of your FOIA professionals and staff with FOIA responsibilities who attended substantive FOIA training during this reporting period.

We estimate 100%.

6. OIP has directed agencies to "take steps to ensure that all of their FOIA professionals attend substantive FOIA training at least once throughout the year." If your response to
the previous question is that less than 80% of your FOIA professionals attended training, please explain your agency's plan to ensure that all FOIA professionals receive or attend substantive FOIA training during the next reporting
year.

7. Did your FOIA professionals engage in any outreach or dialogue with the requester community or open government groups regarding your administration of the FOIA?

This question addresses outreach that is conducted outside of the individual request or appeal process. Outreach activities can include engaging with frequent requesters by holding meetings or events which include them, conducting surveys or
otherwise soliciting requester feedback, or participating in any other requester initiative coordinated by your agency or by others, such as OIP.

Example: An agency receives numerous requests from one organization seeking similar types of records. The organization does not know how the agency organizes its records or how its FOIA professionals must conduct searches. When
submitting FOIA requests, the organization often submits broad requests that take a long time to process and that result in the review of a lot of records that are ultimately of no interest to the requester. The agency holds a meeting with the
organization to discuss its record keeping system, search capabilities, and overall FOIA process to assist the organization in the formulation of future FOIA requests. Because of the meeting, the organization now submits more targeted requests that
result in the agency being able to provide the requester the records it is interested in more quickly.

Yes, Stephanie D. Garner, Assistant Legal Counsel, in conjunction with the Philadelphia District office, participated in an outreach session to discuss FOIA processing of EEOC records with Pennsylvania State and Local Fair Employment Practices
Agencies.

Peggy Mastroianni, Legal Counsel, and Stephanie Garner, Assistant Legal Counsel, met with principals from the Center for Effective Government to receive feedback on revised FOIA webpage and to consider comments and suggestions for further
improvement of the webpage.

8. If you did not conduct any outreach during the reporting period, please explain why.

Not applicable.

Discretionary Releases:

9. Does your agency have a distinct process or system in place to review records for discretionary release?

Yes, all components have a process for discretionary release of documents. A higher level official reviews the initial processor's recommendation concerning both exemption usage and discretionary release. This tiered approach ensures both that
discretionary releases occur as frequently as possible, and that exemption usage is both proper and only asserted when disclosure is either prohibited by other legal authorities, or when disclosure will result in foreseeable harm to an EEOC
interest.

10. During the reporting period, did your agency make any discretionary releases of information?

Exemption (b)(5) would have covered the discretionarily closed material.

12. Provide a narrative description, as well as some specific examples, of the types of information that your agency released as a matter of discretion during the reporting year.

With respect to over 17,000 requests for EEOC charge files, EEOC released factual portions of the Investigator's Memorandum, factual portions of the Priority Charge Handling Procedure forms and portions of the Intake Questionnaire.

13. If your agency was not able to make any discretionary releases of information, please explain why. For example, you should note here if your agency did not have an opportunity to make discretionary disclosures because you provided
full releases in response to all requests or the only exemptions that were applied were those that do not lend themselves to discretionary release (i.e. Exemptions 1, 3, 4, 6, 7A, 7B, 7C, 7F).

Not applicable.

Other Initiatives:

14. Describe any efforts your agency has undertaken to inform non-FOIA professionals of their obligations under the FOIA.

The Chief Human Capital Officer and members of her staff and a Commissioner's Special Assistant were briefed on their responsibilities under the FOIA.

EEOC is in the process of having OIP's FOIA for all Federal Employees Learning module converted into an on-line exam that all non-FOIA professionals can be required to take annually. OIP's FOIA training for Senior Executives briefing video will
be made available later in the year to those senior executives who have either not received a personal FOIA briefing, or who request to see the video.

15. If there are any other initiatives undertaken by your agency to ensure that the presumption of openness is being applied, please describe them here.

If any of these initiatives are online, please provide links in your description.

At every opportunity, EEOC FOIA professionals are reminded of their responsibility to review each document with an eye toward disclosure. It is emphasized that records should be redacted wherever possible, not withheld in full. EEOC has also
provided substantive training to FOIA professionals on exemption (b)(5) to help instill the requirement to review each record with an eye toward making discretionary releases and to only withhold records when there is a "real" harm to an EEOC
interest.

Section II: Steps Taken to Ensure that Your Agency Has an Effective System in Place for Responding to Requests

The Attorney General's 2009 FOIA Guidelines emphasized that "[a]pplication of the proper disclosure standard is only one part of ensuring transparency. Open government requires not just
a presumption of disclosure, but also an effective system for responding to FOIA requests." It is essential that agencies effectively manage their FOIA program.

Please answer the following questions to describe the steps your agency has taken to ensure that the management of your FOIA program is effective and efficient. You should also include any additional information that that describes your agency's
efforts in this area.

Processing Procedures:

1. For Fiscal Year 2015, what was the average number of days your agency reported for adjudicating requests for expedited processing? Please see Section VIII.A. of your agency's Fiscal Year 2015 Annual FOIA Report.

Please note here if your agency did not adjudicate any requests for expedited processing during Fiscal Year 2015.

The EEOC's average number of days to adjudicate requests for expedited processing was 2.64.

2. If your agency's average number of days to adjudicate requests for expedited processing was above ten calendar days, please describe the steps your agency will take to ensure that requests for expedited processing are adjudicated
within ten calendar days or less.

Not applicable.

3. If your agency has a decentralized FOIA process, has your agency taken steps to make the routing of misdirected requests within your agency more efficient? If so, please describe those steps.

If your agency is already handling the routing of misdirected requests in an efficient manner, please note that here and describe your process for these requests.

Misdirected requests are electronically forwarded to the appropriate office within 10 days of receipt.

4. On July 2, 2015, OIP issued new guidance to agencies on the proper procedures to be used in the event an agency has a reason to inquire whether a requester is still interested in
the processing of his or her request. Please confirm here that to the extent your agency may have had occasion to send a "still interested" inquiry, it has done so in accordance with the new guidelines for doing so, including affording requesters
thirty working days to respond.

EEOC has not sent any "still interested" inquiries to requesters.

Requester Services:

5. Agency FOIA Requester Service Centers and FOIA Public Liaisons serve as the face and voice of an agency. In this capacity they provide a very important service for requesters, informing them about how the FOIA process works and
providing specific details on the handling of their individual requests. The FOIA also calls on agency FOIA Requester Service Centers and FOIA Public Liaisons to assist requesters in resolving disputes. Please explain here any steps your agency has
taken to strengthen these services to better inform requesters about their requests and to prevent or resolve FOIA disputes.

If your agency has not taken any steps recently to strengthen these services, either because there has been no need to due to low demand or because these services are already robust, please briefly explain that that here.

The EEOC has established two FOIA Requester Service Centers, one in Washington, DC and one in our Los Angeles District Office, to serve requesters. EEOC has one FOIA Public Liaison located in Washington, DC. In Fiscal Year 2015, some FOIA Liaison
duties such as responding to requester telephone calls and written communications were distributed among FOIA Programs staff to ensure a rapid response to all questions and/or concerns. However, all requesters may continue to contact the FOIA Public
Liaison directly for assistance.

Other Initiatives:

6. If there are any other steps your agency has undertaken to ensure that your FOIA system operates efficiently and effectively, such as conducting self-assessments to find greater efficiencies, improving search processes, eliminating
redundancy, etc., please describe them here.

We have not taken any other such steps.

Section III: Steps Taken to Increase Proactive Disclosures

Both the President's and Attorney General's FOIA memoranda focused on the need for
agencies to work proactively to post information online without waiting for individual requests to be received.

Please answer the following questions to describe the steps your agency has taken to increase the amount of material that is available on your agency websites. In addition to the questions below, you should also describe any additional steps
taken by your agency to make and improve proactive disclosures of information.

Posting Material:

1.Describe your agency's process or system for identifying "frequently requested" records required to be posted online under Subsection (a)(2) of the FOIA. For example, does your agency monitor its FOIA logs or is there some other system
in place to identify these records for posting.

EEOC monitors non-charge file FOIA requests. If the same material has been requested three times or has been requested two times with a strong likelihood of a third request, the material is posted on-line.

2. Does your agency have a distinct process or system in place to identify other records for proactive disclosure? If so, please describe your agency's process or system.

Please note that this question is directed towards proactive disclosure of records that go beyond frequently requested records required to be posted under Subsection (a)(2) of the FOIA.

Almost 99% of the almost 18,000 FOIA requests and 7,000 Section 83 of Volume I the EEOC Compliance Manual requests EEOC receives annually are for investigative charge files. Three of the statutes the EEOC enforces -- Title VII, the ADA, and GINA
-- contain confidentiality provisions that prohibit the EEOC, its officers, and employees from making charge information public under penalty of arrest, fine, and jail. Consequently, EEOC cannot make discretionary releases of this information to the
public. However, EEOC does make aggregated annual statistical data concerning employment discrimination charges available on its website, and discloses non-confidential statistical data arrays requested by the public. EEOC also made its first
quarterly FOIA log available on its FOIA page.

With regard to the remaining 1% of FOIAs, EEOC is proactively disclosing as much of the requested material as is permitted. Examples of some of the proactive disclosures on our website include informal discussion letters, Fair Employment Practice
contracts, and aggregated EEO-1 data predating November 1, 1996, when agencies were required to make records available in electronic as well as paper format.

During FOIA Staff meetings, individuals identify unusual FOIA requests and/or similar requests. These requests are reviewed to determine whether the records requested should be posted online. Another means of identifying frequently requested
records arises when compiling the FOIA request log and reviewing the records requested.

3. When making proactive disclosures of records, are your agency's FOIA professionals involved in coding the records for Section 508 compliance or otherwise preparing them for posting? If so, provide an estimate of how much time is
involved for each of your FOIA professionals and your agency overall.

Please note that this question is directed at the efforts of actually posting the records online once all disclosure determinations have been made. For example, efforts to load the records in your web content platform or making the releasable
documents accessible in compliance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act.

No. EEOC FOIA Professionals are not involved in coding the records for Section 508 compliance.

4. Has your agency encountered challenges that make it difficult to post records you otherwise would like to post?

Yes.

5. If so, please briefly explain those challenges.

The limited number of IT staff increases the amount of time needed to post records.

6. Provide examples of material that your agency has proactively disclosed during the past reporting year, including links to the posted material.

7. Did your agency use any means to publicize or highlight important proactive disclosures for public awareness? If yes, please describe those efforts.

For example, this can be done through social media or with the offering of e-mail subscription services.

Yes. The EEOC issued a press release about our revised FOIA webpage.

Other Initiatives:

8. If there are any other steps your agency has taken to increase proactive disclosures, please describe them here.

No further steps were taken.

Section IV: Steps Taken to Greater Utilize Technology

A key component of the President's FOIA Memorandum was the direction to "use modern technology to inform citizens about what is known and done by
their Government." In addition to using the internet to make proactive disclosures, agencies should also be exploring ways to utilize technology in responding to requests.

Please answer the following questions to describe how your agency is utilizing technology to improve its FOIA administration and the public's access to information. You should also include any additional information that that describes your
agency's efforts in this area.

Making Material Posted Online More Usable:

1. Beyond posting new material, is your agency taking steps to make the posted information more useable to the public, especially to the community of individuals who regularly access your agency's website?

Steps can include soliciting feedback on the content and presentation of posted material, improving search capabilities on your agency website, posting material in open formats, making information available through mobile applications, providing
explanatory material, etc.

Yes. See Twitter and other items on EEOC home page, such as EEOC's Press releases. The EEOC is also in the process of working to update both the FOIA website and the EEOC's website to include Spanish versions of the posted materials.

2. If yes, please provide examples of such improvements.

If your agency is already posting material in its most useful format, please describe these efforts.

EEOC's website is now more user- friendly, and its Twitter feed includes tweets from other agencies. EEOC also launched a new service, Direct Video Acccess, which enables individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing whose primary
language is American Sign Language (ASL) to communicate directly with agency staff about issues of discrimination they may be facing. EEOC information intake representatives who are fluent in ASL will be available to answer questions and guide
callers through the process of filing a charge of discrimination using videophones. Previously, individuals who were deaf and or hard of hearing relied on an interpreter using relay services when they contacted EEOC. This new system provides direct
access to an EEOC employee who can answer the caller's question in ASL over a videophone. EEOC is only the third federal agency-after the Federal Communications Commission and the Small Business Administration-to provide this direct access to the
public.

3. Have your agency's FOIA professionals interacted with other agency staff (such as technology specialists or public affairs or communications professionals) in order to identify if there are any new ways to post agency information
online?

Yes. FOIA professionals interacted with other agency staff in the revision and update of the FOIA page.

Use of Technology to Facilitate Processing of Requests:

4. Did your agency conduct training for FOIA staff on any new processing tools during the reporting period, such as for a new case management system, or for search, redaction, or other processing tools.

Please note that this question is focused on training provided to your FOIA professionals for the use of technology and IT tools that assist them in their day-to-day work of processing requests. Your agency's efforts to provide substantive
training on the FOIA itself and the requirements of the law should be addressed in response to Question 1 of Section I of your Chief FOIA Officer Report.

Yes. In August 2015 the EEOC conducted agency wide training on FOIAXpress, the agency's new processing tool.

5. Beyond using technology to redact documents, is your agency taking steps to use more advanced technology to facilitate overall FOIA efficiency, such as improving record search capabilities, utilizing document sharing platforms for
consultations and referrals, or employing software that can sort and de-duplicate documents? If yes, describe the technological improvements being made.

We are not taking such steps at this time.

6. Are there additional tools that could be utilized by your agency to create further efficiencies?

The EEOC is looking at purchasing de-duplicating equipment. The EEOC is also considering whether moving to electronic processing of charge files is feasible. Electronic processing of charge files would reduce response time by removing the need
for an individual to scan the charge file into FOIAXpress to be processed.

Other Initiatives:

7. Did your agency successfully post all four quarterly reports for Fiscal Year 2015?

Please see OIP's guidance for posting of quarterly reports to ensure that your agency is following all required steps (including using the correct file type and URL structure) so
that your quarterly reports are properly appearing on FOIA.gov. (If your reports are posted to your website, but not appearing of FOIA.gov, please contact OIP in order to resolve the issue.)

Yes. The EEOC successfully posted all four quarterly reports.

8. If your agency did not successfully post all quarterly reports, with information appearing on FOIA.gov, please explain why and provide your agency's plan for ensuring that such reporting is successful in Fiscal Year 2016.

If decentralized, please indicate whether all components use email or other electronic means to communicate with requesters.

Please note that this includes all types of communications throughout the FOIA process.

EEOC communicates with requesters electronically by e-mail, fax, and Internet. Each FOIA component has its own FOIA e-mail address that is published on the EEOC website.

10. If your agency does not communicate electronically with requests as a default, are there any limitations or restrictions for the use of such means? If yes, does your agency inform requesters about such limitations? Seeid.

If decentralized, please indicate whether any of your agency's components have specific limitations or restrictions for the use of such means and if those components have informed requesters of such limitations.

The EEOC communicates with requesters electronically.

Section V: Steps Taken to Improve Timeliness in Responding to Requests and Reducing Backlogs

The President's FOIA Memorandum and the Attorney General's 2009 FOIA Guidelines have
emphasized the importance of improving timeliness in responding to requests. This section of your Chief FOIA Officer Report addresses both time limits and backlog reduction. Backlog reduction is measured both in terms of numbers of backlogged
requests or appeals and by looking at whether agencies closed their ten oldest requests, appeals, and consultations.

For the figures required in this Section, please use the numbers contained in the specified sections of your agency's 2015 Annual FOIA Report and, when applicable, your agency's 2014 Annual FOIA Report.

Simple Track: Section VII.A of your agency's Annual FOIA Report, entitled "FOIA Requests - Response Time for All Processed Requests," includes figures that show your agency's average response times for processed
requests. For agencies utilizing a multi-track system to process requests, there is a category for "simple" requests, which are those requests that are placed in the agency's fastest (non-expedited) track, based on the low volume and/or simplicity
of the records requested.

Does your agency utilize a separate track for simple requests?

Yes. The EEOC transferred to a multi -track system in late September, 2015. Prior to the transfer the EEOC utilized two tracks: simple and expedited. Therefore, the overwhelming majority of its FOIA requests were placed on the simple track
system.

If so, for your agency overall in Fiscal Year 2015, was the average number of days to process simple requests twenty working days or fewer?

Yes.

Please provide the percentage of requests processed by your agency in Fiscal Year 2015 that were placed in your simple track.

One hundred percent of EEOC's non-expedited requests were placed in our simple track.

If your agency does not track simple requests separately, was the average number of days to process all non-expedited requests twenty working days or fewer?

N/A

Backlogs: Section XII.A of your agency's Annual FOIA Report, entitled "Backlogs of FOIA Requests and Administrative Appeals" shows the numbers of any backlogged requests or appeals from the fiscal year. You should refer
to these numbers from your Annual FOIA Reports for both Fiscal Year 2014 and Fiscal Year 2015 when completing this section of your Chief FOIA Officer Report.

BACKLOGGED REQUESTS

5. If your agency had a backlog of requests at the close of Fiscal Year 2015, did that backlog decrease as compared with the backlog reported at the end of Fiscal Year 2014?

No. The Fiscal Year 2015 backlog increased.

6. If not, explain why and describe the causes that contributed to your agency not being able reduce its backlog. When doing so, please also indicate if any of the following were contributing factors:

An increase in the number of incoming requests.

A loss of staff.

An increase in the complexity of the requests received. If possible, please provide examples or briefly describe the types of complex requests contributing to your backlog increase.

Any other reasons - please briefly describe or provide examples when possible.

The backlog increased for the following reasons: increase in the number of incoming requests, loss of staff, and transitioning to FOIAXpress. All of the FOIA professionals attended training in Washington, D.C. and have experienced issues arising
from placing a new system on the computers.

7. If you had a request backlog please report the percentage of requests that make up the backlog out of the total number of requests received by your agency in Fiscal Year 2015.

To calculate your agency's percentage, you must divide the number of backlogged requests reported in Section XII.A. of your Fiscal Year 2015 Annual FOIA Report by the number of requests received in Fiscal Year 2015, which can be found in Section
V.A. of your Annual FOIA Report. Once divided, you can multiply that number by 100 to get the percentage.

EEOC's request backlog equals 2.52% of the total number of requests received in Fiscal year 2015.

BACKLOGGED APPEALS

8. If your agency had a backlog of appeals at the close of Fiscal Year 2015, did that backlog decrease as compared with the backlog reported at the end of Fiscal Year 2014?

No. The appeal backlog remained the same.

9. If not, explain why and describe the causes that contributed to your agency not being able reduce backlog. When doing so, please also indicate if any of the following were contributing factors:

An increase in the number of incoming appeals.

A loss of staff.

An increase in the complexity of the requests received. If possible, please provide examples or briefly describe the types of complex requests contributing to your backlog increase.

Any other reasons - please briefly describe or provide examples when possible.

The backlog remained the same due to the appeals' complexity and the transition to FOIAXpress.

10. If you had an appeal backlog please report the percentage of appeals that make up the backlog out of the total number of appeals received by your agency in Fiscal Year 2015. If your agency did not receive any appeals in
Fiscal Year 2015 and/or has no appeal backlog, please answer with "N/A."

To calculate your agency's percentage, you must divide the number of backlogged appeals reported in Section XII.A. of your Fiscal Year 2015 Annual FOIA Report by the number of appeals received in Fiscal Year 2015, which can be found in Section
V.A. of your Annual FOIA Report. Once divided, you can multiply that number by 100 to get the percentage.

Our appeal backlog equals 1.1% of the total number of appeals received in Fiscal year 2015.

Backlog Reduction Plans:

11. In the 2015 guidelines for Chief FOIA Officer Reports, any agency with a backlog of over 1,000 requests in Fiscal Year 2014 was asked to provide a plan for achieving backlog
reduction in the year ahead. Did you agency implement a backlog reduction plan last year? If so, describe your agency's efforts in implementing this plan and note if your agency was able to achieve backlog reduction in Fiscal Year 2015.

The EEOC did not have a backlog of over 1,000 requests in Fiscal Year 2014 and therefore did not implement a backlog reduction plan in Fiscal Year 2015.

12. If your agency had a backlog of more than 1,000 requests in Fiscal Year 2015, what is your agency's plan to reduce this backlog during Fiscal Year 2016?

The EEOC did not have a backlog of over 1,000 requests in Fiscal Year 2015.

13. In Fiscal Year 2015, did your agency close the ten oldest requests that were reported pending in your Fiscal Year 2014 Annual FOIA Report?

Yes.

14. If no, please provide the number of these requests your agency was able to close by the end of the fiscal year, as listed in Section VII.E of your Fiscal Year 2014 Annual FOIA Report. If you had less than ten total oldest requests to
close, please indicate that.

For example, if you only had seven requests listed as part of your "ten oldest" in Section VII.E. and you closed six of them, you should note that you closed six out of seven "oldest" requests.

Not applicable.

15. Of the requests your agency was able to close from your ten oldest, please indicate how many of these were closed because the request was withdrawn by the requester. If any were closed because the request was withdrawn, did you
provide any interim responses prior to the withdrawal?

None

TEN OLDEST APPEALS

16. In Fiscal Year 2015, did your agency close the ten oldest appeals that were reported pending in your Fiscal Year 2014 Annual FOIA Report?

Yes.

17. If no, please provide the number of these appeals your agency was able to close by the end of the fiscal year, as listed in Section VII.C.(5) of your Fiscal Year 2014 Annual FOIA Report. If you had less than ten total oldest appeals
to close, please indicate that.

For example, if you only had seven appeals listed as part of your "ten oldest" in Section VII.C.(5) and you closed six of them, you should note that you closed six out of seven "oldest" appeals.

The EEOC closed its ten oldest appeals.

TEN OLDEST CONSULTATIONS

18. In Fiscal Year 2015, did your agency close the ten oldest consultations that were reported pending in your Fiscal Year 2014 Annual FOIA Report?

There were no pending consultations at the end of FY 15..

19. If no, please provide the number of these consultations your agency was able to close by the end of the fiscal year, as listed in Section XII.C. of your Fiscal Year 2014 Annual FOIA Report. If you had less than ten total oldest
consultations to close, please indicate that.

For example, if you only had seven consultations listed as part of your "ten oldest" in Section XII.C. and you closed six of them, you should note that you closed six out of seven "oldest" consultations.

21. If your agency was unable to close any of its ten oldest requests because you were waiting to hear back from other agencies on consultations you sent, please provide the date the request was initially received by your agency, the date
when your agency sent the consultation, and the date when you last contacted the agency where the consultation was pending.

Not applicable.

22. If your agency did not close its ten oldest pending requests, appeals, or consultations, please provide a plan describing how your agency intends to close those "ten oldest" requests, appeals, and consultations during Fiscal Year
2016.

Yes, the EEOC provides responses on an on-going basis as responsive records are received and reviewed.

24. If your agency had a backlog in Fiscal Year 2015, please provide an estimate of the number or percentage of cases in the backlog where a substantive, interim response was provided during the fiscal year, even though the request was
not finally closed.

2. If so, please provide the total number of times exclusions were invoked.

Not applicable.

Success Story

Out of all the activities undertaken by your agency since March 2015 to increase transparency and improve FOIA administration, please briefly describe here at least one success story that you would like to highlight as emblematic of your agency's
efforts. The success story can come from any one of the five key areas. As noted above, these agency success stories will be highlighted during Sunshine Week by OIP. To facilitate this process,
all agencies should use bullets to describe their success story and limit their text to a half page. The success story is designed to be a quick summary of key achievements. A complete description of all your efforts will be contained in the body of
your Chief FOIA Officer Report.

Providing the first annual FOIA training for all agency FOIA professionals at a single venue --EEOC's Washington, DC headquarters offices.

Having the Director of the Office of Information Policy at DOJ, Melanie A. Pustay, EEOC's Chief FOIA Officer, Peggy R. Mastroianni, and the Director of the Office of Field Programs, Nicholas M. Inzeo, personally speak to the participants about
the importance of their jobs as FOIA professionals. Director Pustay discussed with participants best FOIA customer service practices, such as the importance of interim contacts with requesters during the pendency of a delayed response to a request,
as opposed to the disfavored approach of sending requesters "still interested" letters.

Culminating a year-long process to configure FOIAXpress to the requirements of EEOC FOIA processing.

The in-person FOIAXpress training provided to the participants by the contractor (AINS) and the substantive FOIA training provided by EEOC headquarters FOIA professionals was a resounding success.