ocean of neutral molecular change, imposed every now
and again when selection casts a stone on the waters of
evolution”. 6

The Neutral Model incorporates not only codon
redundancy, but vast amounts of ‘junk DNA’ as a source
of mutational genetic novelty which forms an inherent
assumption of the model. Negating these Neutral Theory
assumptions and premises are new discoveries in full codon
utility, multilayered embedded codes in and around genes,
and pervasive genome transcription and functionality. In
addition, extensive computational modelling of Neutral
Theory has also revealed that it is defunct as a viable working
evolutionary model, and would be even if the genome were
heavily composed of ‘junk’.

So not only has the Neo-Darwinian Model been disproved,
but the alternative Neutral Model has come up wanting
as well. The evolutionary response by some has been to
reject both evolutionary paradigms along with the obvious
conclusion that living systems were engineered by an
omnipotent Creator. Their alternative, called the ‘Extended
Evolutionary Synthesis’, is really nothing but a position of
blissful ignorance in hopes of discovering some yet unknown
evolutionary process in a variety of research areas that are,
in reality, only proving to be goldmines of opportunity
for creation scientists. Scientific discovery in the area of
molecular biology and genomics is steam rolling forward
and only revealing a picture of nearly infinite cellular and
organismal complexity.