Country Trends

Curious about the Footprints ofindividual countries?

Solomon Islands

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Solomon Islands since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Solomon Islands in the upper-right corner of the graph.

New Caledonia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in New Caledonia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for New Caledonia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

French Guiana

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in French Guiana since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for French Guiana in the upper-right corner of the graph.

British Virgin Islands

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in British Virgin Islands since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for British Virgin Islands in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Russian Federation

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Russian Federation since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Russian Federation in the upper-right corner of the graph.

World

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in World since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for World in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Tonga

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Tonga since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Tonga in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Sao Tome and Principe

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Sao Tome and Principe since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Sao Tome and Principe in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Saint Lucia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Saint Lucia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Saint Lucia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Samoa

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Samoa since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Samoa in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Saint Kitts and Nevis

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Saint Kitts and Nevis since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Saint Kitts and Nevis in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Montenegro

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Montenegro since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Montenegro in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Martinique

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Martinique since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Martinique in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Guyana

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Guyana since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Guyana in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Guadeloupe

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Guadeloupe since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Guadeloupe in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Grenada

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Grenada since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Grenada in the upper-right corner of the graph.

French Polynesia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in French Polynesia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for French Polynesia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Fiji

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Fiji since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Fiji in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Djibouti

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Djibouti since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Djibouti in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Cyprus

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Cyprus since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Cyprus in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Cape Verde

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Cape Verde since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Cape Verde in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Barbados

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Barbados since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Barbados in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Dominica

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Dominica since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Dominica in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Czechoslovakia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Czechoslovakia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Czechoslovakia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Côte d’Ivoire

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Côte d’Ivoire since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Côte d’Ivoire in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Comoros

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Comoros since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Comoros in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Zimbabwe

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Zimbabwe since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Zimbabwe in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Zambia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Zambia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Zambia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Yemen

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Yemen since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Yemen in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Viet Nam

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Viet Nam since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Viet Nam in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Uzbekistan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Uzbekistan since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Uzbekistan in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Uruguay

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Uruguay since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Uruguay in the upper-right corner of the graph.

United States of America

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in United States of America since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for United States of America in the upper-right corner of the graph.

United Kingdom

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in United Kingdom since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for United Kingdom in the upper-right corner of the graph.

United Arab Emirates

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in United Arab Emirates since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for United Arab Emirates in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Ukraine

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Ukraine since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Ukraine in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Turkmenistan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Turkmenistan since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Turkmenistan in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Turkey

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Turkey since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Turkey in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Tunisia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Tunisia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Tunisia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Uganda

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Uganda since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Uganda in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Togo

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Togo since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Togo in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Thailand

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Thailand since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Thailand in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Tanzania

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Tanzania since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Tanzania in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Tajikistan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Tajikistan since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Tajikistan in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Syrian Arab Republic

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Syrian Arab Republic since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Syrian Arab Republic in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Switzerland

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Switzerland since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Switzerland in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Sweden

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Sweden since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Sweden in the upper-right corner of the graph.

SriLanka

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in SriLanka since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for SriLanka in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Spain

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Spain since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Spain in the upper-right corner of the graph.

South Africa

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in South Africa since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for South Africa in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Somalia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Somalia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Somalia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Slovenia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Slovenia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Slovenia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Slovakia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Slovakia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Slovakia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Singapore

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Singapore since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Singapore in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Sierra Leone

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Sierra Leone since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Sierra Leone in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Serbia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Serbia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Serbia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Rwanda

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Rwanda since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Rwanda in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Senegal

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Senegal since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Senegal in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Romania

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Romania since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Romania in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Portugal

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Portugal since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Portugal in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Poland

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Poland since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Poland in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Philippines

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Philippines since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Philippines in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Peru

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Peru since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Peru in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Paraguay

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Paraguay since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Paraguay in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Papua New Guinea

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Papua New Guinea since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Papua New Guinea in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Panama

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Panama since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Panama in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Pakistan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Pakistan since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Pakistan in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Oman

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Oman since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Oman in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Norway

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Norway since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Norway in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Nigeria

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Nigeria since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Nigeria in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Niger

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Niger since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Niger in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Nicaragua

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Nicaragua since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Nicaragua in the upper-right corner of the graph.

New Zealand

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in New Zealand since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for New Zealand in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Netherlands

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Netherlands since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Netherlands in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Nepal

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Nepal since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Nepal in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Myanmar

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Myanmar since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Myanmar in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Mozambique

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mozambique since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mozambique in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Morocco

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Morocco since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Morocco in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Mongolia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mongolia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mongolia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Moldova

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Moldova since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Moldova in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Mexico

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mexico since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mexico in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Mauritius

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mauritius since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mauritius in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Mauritania

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mauritania since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mauritania in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Master

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Master since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Master in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Mali

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Mali since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Mali in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Malawi

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Malawi since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Malawi in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Madagascar

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Madagascar since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Madagascar in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Macedonia TFYR

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Macedonia TFYR since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Macedonia TFYR in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Malaysia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Malaysia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Malaysia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Lithuania

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Lithuania since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Lithuania in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Libyan Arab Jamahiriya since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Libyan Arab Jamahiriya in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Lebanon

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Lebanon since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Lebanon in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Latvia

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Latvia since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Latvia in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Lao People's Democratic Republic

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Lao People's Democratic Republic since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Lao People's Democratic Republic in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Korea, Republic of

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Korea, Republic of since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Korea, Republic of in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Korea, DPR

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Korea, DPR since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Korea, DPR in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Kenya

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Kenya since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Kenya in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Jordan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Jordan since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Jordan in the upper-right corner of the graph.

Japan

This graph tracks the per-person Ecological Footprint and biocapacity in Japan since 1961.
Both are measured in global hectares.
Biocapacity per person varies each year with ecosystem management, agricultural practices (such as fertilizer use and irrigation), ecosystem degradation, and weather, and population size.
Footprint per person varies with consumption amounts and production efficiency.
Where a dotted line is shown, interpolation estimates have been used in place of highly unlikely outliers in the results.
While most input data for the Footprint accounts come from UN statistical sources, the quality of country results varies.
The quality of the assessment is scored on a 1-6 scale, and is provided for Japan in the upper-right corner of the graph.