You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum. This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.

Last year Chicago was tied for 19th most sacks in the league and Green Bay was tied for 27th.

Hardly what I would call "Very good pass rushing teams."

Sorry I thought this was 2012.

You're right, lets say definitively how good they are with only a game and a half to judge them by.

Judging it by the years prior too

GB was 2nd in 2010. 2011 was a down year in terms of pass rushing for them

2009 they were like 10th isn

2008 was last time they were both bad before last year.

They are good on annual basis.

You criticize me using last years stats (two games ago) then bring up stats from three years ago (10th still isn't VERY good btw) to try to strengthen your argument? Your hypocrisy is once again unmatched._________________

Last year Chicago was tied for 19th most sacks in the league and Green Bay was tied for 27th.

Hardly what I would call "Very good pass rushing teams."

Sorry I thought this was 2012.

You're right, lets say definitively how good they are with only a game and a half to judge them by.

Judging it by the years prior too

GB was 2nd in 2010. 2011 was a down year in terms of pass rushing for them

2009 they were like 10th isn

2008 was last time they were both bad before last year.

They are good on annual basis.

You criticize me using last years stats (two games ago) then bring up stats from three years ago (10th still isn't VERY good btw) to try to strengthen your argument? Your hypocrisy is once again unmatched.

You are obviously wrong and simply wont admit it.

You probably thought Russell Wilson was going to Pro Bowl after 1 pre-season game too.

Last year Chicago was tied for 19th most sacks in the league and Green Bay was tied for 27th.

Hardly what I would call "Very good pass rushing teams."

Sorry I thought this was 2012.

You're right, lets say definitively how good they are with only a game and a half to judge them by.

Judging it by the years prior too

GB was 2nd in 2010. 2011 was a down year in terms of pass rushing for them

2009 they were like 10th isn

2008 was last time they were both bad before last year.

They are good on annual basis.

You criticize me using last years stats (two games ago) then bring up stats from three years ago (10th still isn't VERY good btw) to try to strengthen your argument? Your hypocrisy is once again unmatched.

You are obviously wrong and simply wont admit it.

You probably thought Russell Wilson was going to Pro Bowl after 1 pre-season game too.

This whole OP is overreaction 101

What am I wrong about? Until tonight, there hasn't been anything in the last 17 regular season games to say these teams were "VERY good pass rushing teams" like you claimed they were.

I never thought Russell Wilson was going to be a Pro Bowler after one preseason game, way to put words in my mouth, but I'm excited to see what he can do.

You're so delusional on all topics you talk about I'm just going to do my best to give you the same treatment I gave Go_LiOnS. I'm gonna try to skip reading your posts and try to avoid responding to them. You don't bring any value to any discussion._________________

I don't think they are very good pass rushing teams- they both have great individual pass rushers, but the rest of both lines leave a lot to be desired (BJ Raji is probably the best after Clay and Peppers, he isn't bad but certainly leaves a lot to be desired IMO). Last years stats are the most relevant stats to cite this early in the season.

They looked better tonight because of the OL's_________________

detfan782004 wrote:

diehardlionfan wrote:

When I die I want the Lions to be pallbearers so they can let me down one more time.

Last year Chicago was tied for 19th most sacks in the league and Green Bay was tied for 27th.

Hardly what I would call "Very good pass rushing teams."

Sorry I thought this was 2012.

You're right, lets say definitively how good they are with only a game and a half to judge them by.

Judging it by the years prior too

GB was 2nd in 2010. 2011 was a down year in terms of pass rushing for them

2009 they were like 10th isn

2008 was last time they were both bad before last year.

They are good on annual basis.

You criticize me using last years stats (two games ago) then bring up stats from three years ago (10th still isn't VERY good btw) to try to strengthen your argument? Your hypocrisy is once again unmatched.

You are obviously wrong and simply wont admit it.

You probably thought Russell Wilson was going to Pro Bowl after 1 pre-season game too.

This whole OP is overreaction 101

What am I wrong about? Until tonight, there hasn't been anything in the last 17 regular season games to say these teams were "VERY good pass rushing teams" like you claimed they were.

I never thought Russell Wilson was going to be a Pro Bowler after one preseason game, way to put words in my mouth, but I'm excited to see what he can do.

You're so delusional on all topics you talk about I'm just going to do my best to give you the same treatment I gave Go_LiOnS. I'm gonna try to skip reading your posts and try to avoid responding to them. You don't bring any value to any discussion.

Was GB not 2nd year before last? Just run away with tail between legs for being wrong._________________