I am a plastic surgeon in Little Rock, AR. I used to "suture for a living", I continue "to live to sew". These days most of my sewing is piecing quilts. I love the patterns and interplay of the fabric color. I would like to explore writing about medical/surgical topics as well as sewing/quilting topics. I will do my best to make sure both are represented accurately as I share with both colleagues and the general public.

Followers

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Negative-pressure wound therapy probably does not promote healing. This is the conclusion of Frank Peinemann and Stefan Sauerland's meta-analysis in the current edition of Deutsches Ärzteblatt International (Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011; 108[22]: 381-9).

The press release actually contained a link to a pdf file of the article (full reference and link below).

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), also known as vacuum assisted closure, involves covering the wound with an an airtight film and an adjustable negative pressure is applied using an electronically controlled pump. The vacuum or negative pressure drains wound exudate. NPWT is used for chronic persistent wounds and complicated wounds.

The article by Peinemann and Sauerland is a systematic review of the literature (English and German), aimed at evaluating wound healing and adverse events following NPWT in comparison to conventional treatment in patients with acute or chronic wounds. From the beginning summary:

We found reports of 9 RCTs in addition to the 12 covered by earlier IQWiG reviews of this topic. Five of the 9 new trials involved NPWT systems that are not on the market. The frequency of complete wound closure is stated in only 5 of the 9 new reports; a statistically significant effect in favor of NPWT was found in only two trials.The results of 8 of the 9 new trials are hard to interpret, both because of apparent bias and because diverse types of wounds were treated.

Data analysis used complete wound closure as the primary endpoint. This was based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) 2006 Guidance for Industry definition for complete wound closure as “skin closure without drainage or dressing requirements.”

The following dependent variables were used as secondary endpoints: ● Adverse events, such as death, secondary amputations, fistula formation, and wound infection ● Time to complete wound closure ● Reduction in wound size ● Health-related quality of life.

In the discussion section of the article, some key summaries:

Regarding the primary endpoint of “wound closure” – results were not homogenous. The authors notes it is currently impossible to be sure that NPWT performs better than control treatments.

Regarding the secondary endpoints

– Most articles reported “time to wound closure” occurred quicker in NPWT groups. The authors note “However, there were considerable differences between trials in terms of the methods used to measure and evaluate wound closure; particularly problematic is the fact that no blinding was used when this endpoint was measured.” So for now, as with the primary endpoint, it remains undecided.

-- The results on adverse events were not homogenous and varied depending on the specific complications. For a number of other adverse events no statistically significant difference was detected.

The authors note that most trials of NPWT were conducted in hospitals. They make this point in regard to the FDA report (3rd reference below):

The FDA recently issued a report on six deaths and 77 other complications that were reported within a two year period in connection with NPWT . All the deaths were caused by acute hemorrhages, and known contraindications for NPWT (e.g. a large blood vessel exposed) had clearly been overlooked. Many of the deaths occurred in outpatient care or care homes, which highlights the need to monitor therapy.

The authors conclusion:

Although NPWT may have a positive effect on wound healing, there is no proof that it is either superior or inferior to conventional wound treatment. Further RCTs of good methodological quality are required.

No comments:

Disclaimer

My purpose in writing my blog is to attempt to provide good solid medical information on topics of my choosing. It is a way to educate myself, my colleagues, and the general public. References will be provided on medical posts, but not on opinion essays or poetry posts. An additional purpose is to share my interest in quilting topics, a way to show my human side.

Any medical information provided by this site is not a replacement for medical diagnosis, treatment, or professional medical advice. It should not be used to treat or diagnose any medical condition. Always seek professional medical consultation by a licensed physician for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions - please, do not ignore your doctor's medical advice based on information written by the author or commenters of this site. Please do not ask me for medical advice, but instead contact a healthcare provider in your area. Anything written about office/hospital situations/events are fictional examples to get a point across. No patient is/will ever be a specific patient (unless given written permission), but a fictional one. To know more about how I handle medical information about patients please link here. Unless, I am praising a colleague, even those will be fictional. Any similarities to you or people you know is purely coincidental. My husband and I, and our dogs are fair game.

In early 2009 I joined the Better Health Network. As part of that Network, I will occasionally be paid for my writing. Those posts will be clearly noted. I will strive to maintain my high ethical standards. If I add any advertising, it will be clearly marked as such.

Comments are moderated by me (Dr. Ramona Bates). The opinions expressed by the commenter is their own. The blog posts and my comments are my own. Please, remember this is a public blog and as such all comments are also public and visible to everyone. If you leave and comment and later wish to delete it, blogger allows you to do so.

Comments are welcome. If it is one not based on your personal experience, please, note a reference to any medical knowledge you are presenting.

Privacy Principles

I do not intend to use this blog to collect or dispense private health information on patients. If any patient is used as an explicit example for a posting, I will get that patient's consent in writing to use their story and/or photo. The office is permitted by federal privacy laws to make uses and disclosures of your health information for purposes of treatment, payment, and health care operations. However, that is not the intent of this blog. I intend to share information on medical/quilting topics with the general public and my colleagues. This web site does not share or sell any personal information, including your name, address, or email addresses with third parties. Have a blessed day!