The Daily Caller(Washington, DC): California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein staged a dramatic press conference Thursday on Capitol Hill with 10 weapons at her side and unveiled legislation instituting a government ban on more than 150 types of firearms, including rifles, pistols and shotguns.

Flanked by other anti-gun liberal lawmakers, including New York Sen. Chuck Schumer and Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, Feinstein announced the introduction of the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2013.”

The legislation being pushed by Feinstein — who has long history of calling for gun bans — would prohibit the sale, transfer, importation and manufacture of certain firearms.

(CLICK IMAGE to ENLARGE)

During the press event at the Dirksen Senate Office Building, the Democrats described these firearms as “dangerous military-style assault weapons.” The bill would also ban high-capacity ammunition feeding devices that can hold more than 10 rounds.

The Left is impervious to logic. They can’t even be bothered to learn the most basicaspects of the items they wish to ban. And yet they persist.

So in the interest of trying to educate the deliberately obtuse, I’ll include the video below. If someone would like to show it to Ms. Feinstein (and help her with the big words), I’d be eternally grateful:

And I’ll say it AGAIN: The Left disguises their true motives behind the “crisis” of Sandy Hook, et al. Their goal is the elimination of ALL types of firearms in the hands of ANY citizen. When you understand the true intent of the Second Amendment, there is really only ONE conclusion to draw from their vehement attack on it……

First, let me thank you for posting the video. I found it very informative and educational (being as unconversant with weaponry as I am).

Having said that, anyone who watched the video and is still pressing for limiting access to semi-automatic rifles is, 1) Either unwilling to admit the facts (in which case they have no business enacting laws); 2) Too stupid to understand the facts (in which case they have no business enacting laws); 3) Deceitfully pursuing their own agenda in conflict with the facts (in which case they have no business enacting laws).