That all looks about right. Your work utility is about 10 times higher than your utility and variance will be much greater at difficulty 10 which is why it isn't exact. Furthermore your efficiency is at 86% despite the 10x difficulty, which would be about 860% at normal difficulty. All in all you're getting a lot less work from the server since it supports rolltime, and submitting a lot less shares since it's diff10. Assuming the calculations for rewards are correct, this is good news for the server. The efficiency with cgminer will go up the faster the rig is.

If anyone wants to play around with 10Diff shares: diff10.eclipsemc.com port 8337

Give it a shot and see if anything breaks!

Thought I'd give it a shot.Usually my 2 cm1's using the hashvoodoo175 bitsteam (very stable) give a combined U rating (cgminer) of 19.1-19.2So I figured moving to diff10 at best will give me 1.9 and put less pressure on EMC servers, overall it's a win, even if not for me.I've been mining for a while and it's bouncing between 2.0 and 2.1, so I consider this to be a nice win-win.

So moving to diff10, has given me a nice boost in average hashing power per minute and theoretically diff10 should be less strain on the server than diff1. I won't be trying diff1 on my laptop, It only just manages u rating of 1.

Usually my 2 cm1's using the hashvoodoo175 bitsteam (very stable) give a combined U rating (cgminer) of 19.1-19.2So I figured moving to diff10 at best will give me 1.9 and put less pressure on EMC servers, overall it's a win, even if not for me.I've been mining for a while and it's bouncing between 2.0 and 2.1, so I consider this to be a nice win-win.

So moving to diff10, has given me a nice boost in average hashing power per minute and theoretically diff10 should be less strain on the server than diff1. I won't be trying diff1 on my laptop, It only just manages u rating of 1.

There is no boost in hashing power. Utility has always been proportional to hashrate x luck. If it's high at the moment, that's luck.

Usually my 2 cm1's using the hashvoodoo175 bitsteam (very stable) give a combined U rating (cgminer) of 19.1-19.2So I figured moving to diff10 at best will give me 1.9 and put less pressure on EMC servers, overall it's a win, even if not for me.I've been mining for a while and it's bouncing between 2.0 and 2.1, so I consider this to be a nice win-win.

So moving to diff10, has given me a nice boost in average hashing power per minute and theoretically diff10 should be less strain on the server than diff1. I won't be trying diff1 on my laptop, It only just manages u rating of 1.

There is no boost in hashing power. Utility has always been proportional to hashrate x luck. If it's high at the moment, that's luck.

That all looks about right. Your work utility is about 10 times higher than your utility and variance will be much greater at difficulty 10 which is why it isn't exact. Furthermore your efficiency is at 86% despite the 10x difficulty, which would be about 860% at normal difficulty. All in all you're getting a lot less work from the server since it supports rolltime, and submitting a lot less shares since it's diff10. Assuming the calculations for rewards are correct, this is good news for the server. The efficiency with cgminer will go up the faster the rig is.

Yep, it's looking good as long as the rewards are really correct. Hopefully it's just an issue with the reporting in the email alert.

1) I'm using MPBM.2) Sending tens of thousands of shares to MaxBTC, MPBM report zero to 0.03% rejects. (Similar results previously seen with Ozcoin.)3) MPBM is currently reporting 6.38%, 5.15% and 1.83%, to Eclipse us1, 2, 3 after about a hundred shares sent to each server4) The Eclipse "My Workers" page currently shows xxx (0) for all three workers/servers where xxx == total number of shares submitted. I.e., what MPBM is counting as a 'rejected' share EMC is showing as valid.

So, it appears that I'm not seeing a 'true' higher reject rate with EMC than with other pools, but for whatever reason the mining software, MPBM, 'thinks' the pool has rejected shares. Which pretty much never happens on MaxBTC or Ozcoin.

I just kicked the servers.. .specifically US1 was behaving poorly, it should be working now.

The DC last night was suppose to deploy two more servers, but they are still not available to me. They are suppose to be available today, and as soon as they are, I will move US2 and US3 over to those servers to lessen the load on everything, including the network.

With regards to 1diff and 10diff, no, only one server accepts one type of difficulty share, so you can't send a share from diff10.eclipsemc.com to us3.eclipsemc.com for example, it would just be rejected (and vice versa).

LazyOtto - let me get the new server(s) online and I will be curious as to see if the problem fixes itself. The servers are pretty overloaded at the moment, but they should be relieved of the stress by the end of the day.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.

"The botnet tag has been removed from the 'eclipsemc.com' domain. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.

Vinny LaRizaCommunity ModeratorOpenDNS"

Images are not allowed. As your member rank increases, you can use more types of styling in your signature, and your signature can be longer. See the stickies in Meta for more info. Max 2000; characters remaining: 1781