Career Summary

MLB Statistics

Historical (past-seasons) WARP is now based on DRA..
cFIP and DRA are not available on a by-team basis and display as zeroes(0). See TOT line for season totals of these stats.Multiple stints are are currently shown —Click to hide.

YEAR

Team

Lg

G

GS

IP

W

L

SV

H

BB

SO

HR

oppTAv

PPF

H/9

BB/9

HR/9

K/9

GB%

BABIP

TAv

WHIP

FIP

ERA

cFIP

DRA

DRA-

WARP

1949

BRO

MLB

38

31

244.3

17

8

1

223

73

149

17

.000

8.2

2.7

0.6

5.5

0%

.270

.000

1.21

3.15

3.17

0

0.00

0.0

0.0

1950

BRO

MLB

40

35

267.3

19

11

3

258

75

130

22

.264

105

8.7

2.5

0.7

4.4

54%

.270

.236

1.25

3.42

3.70

81

0.00

90.6

0.0

1951

BRO

MLB

40

36

272.0

20

9

0

235

91

164

19

.270

105

7.8

3.0

0.6

5.4

49%

.256

.234

1.20

3.15

3.28

74

2.70

75.4

7.5

1954

BRO

MLB

29

25

144.3

9

8

0

158

49

82

24

.267

103

9.9

3.1

1.5

5.1

45%

.279

.283

1.43

4.57

4.55

97

4.01

96.6

1.8

1955

BRO

MLB

34

31

233.7

20

5

0

222

38

143

35

.259

106

8.6

1.5

1.3

5.5

42%

.258

.237

1.11

3.53

3.20

70

2.80

73.3

6.5

1956

BRO

MLB

38

36

268.0

27

7

0

219

46

139

33

.253

103

7.4

1.5

1.1

4.7

44%

.224

.217

0.99

3.34

3.06

84

3.19

79.9

6.5

1957

BRO

MLB

28

28

198.7

11

12

0

199

33

90

28

.264

104

9.0

1.5

1.3

4.1

41%

.258

.251

1.17

3.95

3.49

99

4.00

98.6

2.5

1958

CIN

0

20

18

133.3

7

7

1

159

28

53

20

.268

107

10.7

1.9

1.4

3.6

45%

.296

.274

1.40

4.31

3.85

0

0.00

116.1

0.0

1958

LAN

0

11

8

34.3

0

6

0

53

8

16

11

.261

106

13.9

2.1

2.9

4.2

29%

.328

.346

1.78

6.44

7.86

0

0.00

107.4

0.0

1959

CIN

MLB

30

29

222.0

13

8

1

216

27

100

25

.264

103

8.8

1.1

1.0

4.1

47%

.257

.233

1.09

3.62

3.16

86

3.50

87.8

4.4

1960

CIN

0

16

15

82.7

4

6

0

99

14

36

12

.257

103

10.8

1.5

1.3

3.9

44%

.301

.295

1.37

4.28

4.57

0

0.00

103.4

0.0

1960

CLE

0

20

2

54.0

2

3

1

61

8

27

6

.256

98

10.2

1.3

1.0

4.5

39%

.306

.257

1.28

3.29

4.33

0

0.00

102.3

0.0

1958

TOT

MLB

31

26

167.7

7

13

1

212

36

69

31

.266

107

11.4

1.9

1.7

3.7

40%

.303

.290

1.48

4.75

4.67

104

5.42

114.3

-0.6

1960

TOT

MLB

36

17

136.7

6

9

1

160

22

63

18

.257

101

10.5

1.4

1.2

4.1

42%

.303

.280

1.33

3.89

4.48

101

4.22

103.0

1.3

Career

MLB

344

294

2154.7

149

90

7

2102

490

1129

252

.233

92

8.8

2.0

1.1

4.7

46%

.264

.219

1.20

3.64

3.56

77

0.00

0.0

0.0

Statistics for All Levels

'opp' stats - Quality of opponents faced - have been moved and are available only as OPP_QUAL in the Statistics reports now.Minor league stats are currently shown —Click to hide.

BP Chats

In a Washington Post letter to the editor yesterday, a reader scoffed at Dave Johnson limiting Strasburg in his second start of the season to only 6 innings and 100 pitches. The reader brought up Don Newcombe's very amazing September 6, 1950 performance of pitching a complete game and then throwing another 7 innings to start the second game of a double header. The reader wondered what Newk would think about Strasburg.
So what are the Process' current thoughts on pitch counts?
And what would be a snappy response should I ever have the "Newk" card thrown at me in a baseball debate?(Paul from DC)

Piitch counts are useless without context, and I think they're a little overblown in the MSM (though not as much as innings totals). We all know that Roy Halladay throwing 120 pitches isn't the same as Max Scherzer throwing 120 pitches, but the reasons *why* they aren't equivalent can't be gleaned from simply looking at a box score. (Bradley Ankrom)