Legal weed: An accidental solution to the opioid crisis?

. . . The opioid overdose epidemic is . . . [the] gravest public health crisis since the emergence of HIV in the 1980s. With its roots in the over-prescription of high-potency painkillers, sparked by the contamination of the illicit drug supply with fentanyl and related drugs, the crisis has reached across demographic divides. Experts agree on the need for creative responses based in scientific evidence.

Could cannabis legalization be a part of this solution? Increasingly, this is what the latest scientific research indicates.

We know now that these drugs carry an extremely high risk of dependence and fatal overdose. Despite this, more than 20 million opioid prescriptions are filled each year in Canada. Drug overdoses are now the leading cause of death among Americans under the age of 50. And prescription opioids are involved in nearly half of these deaths. It is also becoming apparent that opioids might be less effective than initially thought in treating certain types of chronic non-cancer pain (e.g. neuropathic pain).

Cannabis, derived from the Cannabis sativa plant, contains several compounds. These include tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, the primary psychoactive component of cannabis) and cannabidiol (CBD). Beyond the well-known psychoactive effects of cannabinoids, new research has shown that they also interact with systems in the body involved in the regulation of pain.

This discovery has led researchers to investigate the potential for cannabis to treat various pain conditions for which opioids are currently first- or second-line therapies. High-quality clinical research involving cannabis has been stunted by its prohibited legal status. But a recent review of clinical studies involving cannabis-based medicines (including smoked or vapourized cannabis) found strong evidence for relief of chronic non-cancer pain.

Ground-breaking findings

The substitution effect is an idea from behavioural economics that describes how the use of one product might decrease when the availability of another increases. Substance use researchers have recently adapted this theory to understand the substitution potential between cannabis and opioids. In other words, does the use of opioids decrease with increasing access to cannabis?

In a landmark 2014 study, a team of researchers analzyed data from across the United States over a 10-year period. They found that states that had legalized medical cannabis saw 25 per cent fewer opioid-related deaths compared to states where medical cannabis remained illegal.

These findings broke ground for others in the field to find associations between U.S. medical cannabis laws and reduced state-level estimates of opioid use and dependence. But, because these population-level studies cannot observe individual-level changes in cannabis and opioid use, a closer look at these trends among different sub-populations of people affected by the opioid crisis is needed.

Not surprisingly, findings from surveys conducted among patients using medical cannabis across North America demonstrate a clear preference for cannabis over opioids. For example, roughly one-third of a sample of patients enrolled in Health Canada’s Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations (MMPR) program in B.C. report substituting cannabis for prescription opioids.

For chronic pain patients, this substitution effect appears even more pervasive, with cannabis substitution occurring in roughly two-thirds of a sample of former prescription opioid patients in Michigan who started using medical cannabis.

In the most recent study, 80 per cent of medical cannabis patients in California reported that taking cannabis alone was more effective at treating their medical condition than taking cannabis with opioids. More than 90 per cent agreed they would choose cannabis over opioids to treat their condition if it were readily available.

Illicit opioid use

But what about the relationship between cannabis and opioids among some of those most affected by the opioid crisis — people with long-term experience using illicit opioids?

Untreated pain and substance use have a high degree of overlap. Pain was reported by almost half of people who inject drugs surveyed in a recent San Francisco study.Research from our colleagues in Vancouver found that under-treatment of pain in this population is common. It results in self-management of pain by obtaining heroin or prescription opioids on the street.

This means there could be a role for cannabis even among individuals with extensive experience using illicit opioids. A study from California of people who inject drugs found that those who used cannabis used opioids less often. It’s still unclear if this difference is directly due to cannabis use and more research is needed.

Potential as anxiety treatment

Even without chronic pain, cannabis may prove an effective alternative among individuals wanting to reduce or stop their opioid use. There is growing evidence for the use of cannabis in treating opioid addiction. CBD, the non-psychoactive component of cannabis, is known to interact with several receptors involved in regulating fear and anxiety-related behaviours. It shows potential for the treatment of several anxiety disorders.

Research is also investigating CBD’s role in modulating cravings and relapses — behaviours that are tightly linked to anxiety — among individuals with opioid addiction. Recent preliminary studies suggest that CBD reduces opioid cravings. A larger clinical trial is now underway in the United States.

A bold response?

Canada will soon be the first country in the G-20 to introduce a legal framework regulating the use of cannabis by adults for non-medical purposes. This will create a country-wide natural experiment for the world to observe. Legalizing cannabis will break down traditional barriers to understanding the clinical and public health impacts of the drug.

This massive drug policy change could not come at a more desperate time. By increasing access to the drug for therapeutic and recreational purposes, we will have the opportunity to investigate substitution effects within different populations of people who use opioids.

Protection of youth and removal of organized crime aside, the Cannabis Act may just be the unintentionally bold government response to the opioid crisis that our country so desperately needs.

I have theorized that a new Mason-Dixon line will spring up over legalization; it will be made to appear to be about “values”, but it will be more true to say that it is a line between the states that still aspire to democracy and the states that are run by a rising prison-labor oligarchy that indeed needs to keep the “Negro” drug illegal as part of its racist narrative. Note that Prohibition was foisted by Protestants on America under fearmongering that alcohol was the Catholic/immigrant drug, that to criminalize the drug was to pressure “those people” into assimilation. When those Protestants drove America into the ditch in 1929 and opened the way for FDR’s heavily Catholic & immigrant coalition to storm into power, Prohibition was immediately repealed… yet only three years later, the Federal government outlawed marijuana. It’s as if we can’t function without an ethnically-coded drug threat to tie different forms of oppression into a single narrative.

While the rich historical perspective cited is interesting to ponder. The salient facts show enforcement of crimes without specific victims are pure profit in fines and private-prison incarceration fees to States and Counties and easy pickins’ for local law enforcement to fake. Pot smokers are generally passive, so it’s a safer bust to make.

I’m looking forward to seeing Canada’s results. I hope you, as a nation, can stay on the program solidly enough that the outcomes are clear to the world.

Here in Massachusetts USA the population voted to legalize cannabis a year ago. However, our legislatures and town governments are stalling on implementation. Why? “Reefer madness.” A century of systematic demonization of marijuana users has made governments reluctant to implement the will of the people. Of course, law enforcement people here also oppose drug decriminalization; it threatens their livelihoods.

(There’s a fine book, Chasing the Scream by Johann Hari about this topic.)

In MA, our legislature is messing up this transition. They’re talking about a 20% tax on stores; that’s high enough to keep the black market alive. They’re letting towns refuse to allow retail outlets, which has the same effect. It’s a shame.

Colorado and MA voters legalized cannabis with the “recreational” approach: a libertarian assertion that it does little harm and the state has no business prosecuting people for using it. Washington (state) legalized it with the “juridical” approach: a utilitarian assertion that the state should not waste law-enforcement resources on cannabis.

The juridical approach is much more likely to prevail when governments get around to decriminalizing opiates and other currently illegal substances: few people think opiate addiction is harmless or fun. But the experience in Portugal and Switzerland, as well as experiments elsewhere, show that decriminalization is a far better path than the current one.

Imagine a world where guys with names like El Chapo have to get jobs.

Comments are closed.

Donations

Thank you to all of my supporters for your generosity and your encouragement of an independent press! Checks to