Before The Battles Resume in Washington: A Reminder About What’s Really At Stake

Congress will reconvene shortly. That means more battles over taxes and spending, regulations and safety nets, and how to get the economy out of first gear. Which means more gridlock and continual showdowns over budget resolutions and the debt ceiling.

But before the hostilities start again and we all get lost in puerile politics and petty tactics, it’s useful to consider what’s really at stake for our economy and democracy.

For much of the past century, the basic bargain at the heart of America was that employers paid their workers enough to buy what American employers were selling. Government’s role was to encourage and enforce this bargain. We thereby created a virtuous cycle of higher living standards, more jobs, and better wages. And a democracy that worked reasonably well.

But the bargain has been broken. And until it’s remade, the economy can’t mend and our democracy won’t be responsive to the majority.

First, a bit of history. Back in 1914, Henry Ford announced he was paying workers on his Model T assembly line $5 a day – three times what the typical factory employee earned at the time. The Wall Street Journal termed his action “an economic crime.”

But Ford knew it was a cunning business move. The higher wage turned Ford’s auto workers into customers who could afford to buy Model T’s. In two years Ford’s profits more than doubled.

Yet in the years leading up to the Great Crash of 1929, employers forgot Henry Ford’s example. The wages of most American workers stagnated even as the economy surged. Gains went mainly into corporate profits and into the pockets of the very rich. American families maintained their standard of living by going deeper into debt, and the rich gambled with their gigantic winnings. In 1929 the debt bubble popped.

Sound familiar? It should. The same thing happened in the years leading up to the crash of 2008. The lesson should be obvious. When the economy becomes too lopsided – disproportionately benefiting corporate owners and top executives rather than average workers – it tips over.

It’s still lopsided. We’re emerging from the depths of the worst downturn since the Great Depression but nothing fundamentally has changed. Corporate profits are up largely because payrolls are down. Even Ford Motor Company is now paying its new hires half what it paid new employees a few years ago.

Employee pay is now down to the smallest share of the economy since the government began collecting wage and salary data sixty years ago; and corporate profits, the largest share.

This is a losing game for corporations over the long term. Without enough American consumers, their profitable days are numbered. Europeans are in no mood to buy. India and China are slowing dramatically. Developing nations are in trouble.

Republicans claim rich people and big corporations are job creators, so their taxes must not be raised. This is baloney. In order to create jobs, businesses need customers. But the rich spend only a small fraction of what they earn. They park most of it wherever around the world they can get the highest return.

The real job creators are the vast middle class — whose spending drives the economy and creates jobs. But as the middle class’s share of total income continues to drop, it can’t spend as much as before. Nor can most Americans borrow as they did before the crash of 2008 — borrowing that temporarily masked their declining purchasing power.

As a result, businesses are still reluctant to hire and pay decent wages. Which is why the recovery continues to be so anemic.

As wealth and income rise to the top, moreover, so does political power. Corporations and the rich are able to entrench themselves by keeping low tax rates and special tax breaks (such as the “carried interest” loophole that still allows private equity and hedge fund managers to treat their incomes as capital gains), and ensuring a steady flow of corporate welfare to their businesses (special breaks for oil and gas, big agriculture, big insurance, Big Pharma, and, of course, Wall Street).

All of this continues to squeeze public budgets, corrupt government, and undermine our democracy. The issue is not and has never been the size of our government; it’s who the government is for. Government has become less responsive to the needs of most citizens and more responsive to the demands of the monied interests.

The Republican response is to further reduce taxes on the rich, defund programs for the poor, fight unions, allow the median wage to continue to drop, and oppose any limits on campaign contributions or spending. It does not take a great deal of brainpower to understand this strategy will lead to an even more lopsided economy, more entrenched wealth, and a more corrupt democracy.

So as Congress reconvenes and the battles resume, be clear about what’s at stake. The only way back to a buoyant economy is through a productive system whose gains are more widely shared. The only way back to a responsive democracy is through a political system whose monied interests are more effectively constrained.

About Robert Reich

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as Secretary of Labor under President Bill Clinton.

Subscribe To The Free Social Europe Podcast

Comments

I count myself a Republican, and I do recognize it’s a party with flaws – you note some. But their flaws don’t come close to outweighing the outright fear I have of the Democratic party. Maybe it’s unfounded, maybe not, but as it states in scripture “By their fruits ye shall know them” I see Democrats as folks only willing to spend, spend,
spend. There is no fiscal restraint. That scares me. To me they exemplify the
party of political greed – who will do, say or spend whatever it takes to
maintain and expand that power. The Republicans on the other hand do try to
brand themselves as fiscal responsible and their greed is focused more on
money. I can deal with a guy who is driven by money, but a guy who is driven by
power is so much more dangerous. Of course there are exceptions and there is no
perfect party, but that is why I lean the way I do. BTW – If I was involved
with brokering a deal on this issue – I think I’d like somebody like you across
the table, you have a voice of reason (without all the passion).

Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung AD

Change Through Convergence?
Reform Measures Of European Welfare States In Comparison

The six welfare states under examination – Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom – changed incrementally between 1998 and 2014. These changes led, overall, to the gradual transformation of the welfare states in these countries. In the three policy areas under examination – labour market policy, family policy and pensions policy – the dominant focus is on the labour market and recommodification. This is topped off, besides the self-responsibility already mentioned, increasingly by elements of privatisation and marketisation. In the past two decades there has thus been a substantial restructuring of welfare state social security systems with the predominant aim of encouraging labour market participation.

S&D Group Ad

The Sustainable Shift

The latest edition of the Journal for a Progressive Economy is the first to cover issues around sustainability, and features articles from French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, leading climate activist Bill McKibben and First Vice-President of the European Commission Frans Timmermans, all discussing one of the biggest challenges facing our society; the shift to a sustainable economy.

ETUI Ad

Production networks in many sectors have become increasingly fragmented. Cutting labour costs by lowering pay, increasing work intensity and/or shifting flexibility costs to workers are just some of the motivations for outsourcing. But it can also be used to circumvent employee representation and collective bargaining systems within companies, and labour market regulations in general. Though such intentions may not drive the bulk of outsourcing decisions, any change in company boundaries is likely to impact employment, working conditions and industrial relations in the value chain.

This book focuses on the dynamics of outsourcing in Europe from the perspective of employees. In particular, it considers one insufficiently studied aspect: the impact of outsourcing on working conditions and employment relations in companies. The book also collects lessons learned from the efforts of employees and trade unions to shape outsourcing decisions, processes and their impact on employment and working conditions.

Eurofound Ad

Europe has begun to emerge from the prolonged slump caused by the global financial crisis in 2008 and exacerbated by the euro zone single-currency crisis in 2010–2011. In the last year, aggregate employment levels have risen faster than at any time since 2008. This, the fourth annual European Jobs Monitor report, looks in detail at shifts in the employment structure at Member State and aggregate EU level over 2011–2014.

Hans Böckler Stiftung Ad

This study assesses the ECB's crisis management performance and potential for crisis resolution. The study investigates the institutional and functional constraints that delineate the ECB's scope for policy action under crisis conditions and how the ECB has actually used its leeway since 2007; or might do so in the future. The study finds that the ECB may well stand out positively when compared to other important euro or national authorities involved in managing the euro crisis but that in general the bank did "too little, too late" to prevent the euro area from slipping into recession and protracted stagnation, ending up in its current predicament.