In other news, Venezuelan Scientists are more along the lines of Dr. Krieger from Archer, and have no understanding of how cancer works, or why the US wouldn't use that if they wanted to regime change a political dickbag anyway - they'd use a bullet or a bomb into his daughter's quincenera.

Why does CNN reprint Agitprop from Venezuela anyway? It's stuff like this that should make you go "Huh. Those people really are batshiat insane."

hardinparamedic:In other news, Venezuelan Scientists are more along the lines of Dr. Krieger from Archer, and have no understanding of how cancer works, or why the US wouldn't use that if they wanted to regime change a political dickbag anyway - they'd use a bullet or a bomb into his daughter's quincenera.

Why does CNN reprint Agitprop from Venezuela anyway? It's stuff like this that should make you go "Huh. Those people really are batshiat insane."

I know i know it's not like America has a history of trying to remove heads of states they don't like with poisoned or exploding cigars or anything.

Norfolking Chance:I know i know it's not like America has a history of trying to remove heads of states they don't like with poisoned or exploding cigars or anything.

Because if America wanted Chavez removed with poison, or exploding Cigars, they wouldn't have done it by causing cancer. They'd have done it with poison, or explosives. You know, things guaranteed to kill people?

You don't really get the fact that poisoning someone doesn't work like that, right? Giving someone cancer is hard to do, even with exposure to carcinogens. It's not a sure-fire thing. And it's not even a sure-fire way to get rid of someone. Cancer is treatable. In addition to that, a poison would have caused something along the lines of a Leukemia. Chavez had a solid tumor. In fact, he had it removed and debulked SEVERAL times before his eventual death from metastasis.

hardinparamedic:Norfolking Chance: I know i know it's not like America has a history of trying to remove heads of states they don't like with poisoned or exploding cigars or anything.

Because if America wanted Chavez removed with poison, or exploding Cigars, they wouldn't have done it by causing cancer. They'd have done it with poison, or explosives. You know, things guaranteed to kill people?

You don't really get the fact that poisoning someone doesn't work like that, right? Giving someone cancer is hard to do, even with exposure to carcinogens. It's not a sure-fire thing. And it's not even a sure-fire way to get rid of someone. Cancer is treatable. In addition to that, a poison would have caused something along the lines of a Leukemia. Chavez had a solid tumor. In fact, he had it removed and debulked SEVERAL times before his eventual death from metastasis.

Doesn't matter. They want to believe, strongly enough to die for their belief, and certainly strongly enough to kill their designated enemies for it. Worst of all, their belief doesn't handicap their ability to kill those that dare question their belief as much as the more logical people want to believe, especially since the UN has decided the people who anger the believers are more at fault for the violence directed against them than the believers committing the violence.

hardinparamedic:In other news, Venezuelan Scientists are more along the lines of Dr. Krieger from Archer, and have no understanding of how cancer works, or why the US wouldn't use that if they wanted to regime change a political dickbag anyway - they'd use a bullet or a bomb into his daughter's quincenera.

Why does CNN reprint Agitprop from Venezuela anyway? It's stuff like this that should make you go "Huh. Those people really are batshiat insane."

You'd turn it off when I was halfway across:I think my favourite batshiat conspiracy of this type was Robert Mugabe's claim that the British government weather control was the cause of drought in Zimbabwe.

... because if any country has weather control technology it's clearly going to be a country where it rains >250 days a year.

We just love it when it drizzles.

I remember when I lived in Belgium (pretty identical to England in climate) it wasn't so bad. The rain and lack of light, I guess.

hardinparamedic:In other news, Venezuelan Scientists are more along the lines of Dr. Krieger from Archer, and have no understanding of how cancer works, or why the US wouldn't use that if they wanted to regime change a political dickbag anyway - they'd use a bullet or a bomb into his daughter's quincenera.

Why does CNN reprint Agitprop from Venezuela anyway? It's stuff like this that should make you go "Huh. Those people really are batshiat insane."

President of an oil rich nation who doesn't bend over and kiss America's asshole= political dickbag

Cream of Meat:hardinparamedic: In other news, Venezuelan Scientists are more along the lines of Dr. Krieger from Archer, and have no understanding of how cancer works, or why the US wouldn't use that if they wanted to regime change a political dickbag anyway - they'd use a bullet or a bomb into his daughter's quincenera.

Why does CNN reprint Agitprop from Venezuela anyway? It's stuff like this that should make you go "Huh. Those people really are batshiat insane."

President of an oil rich nation who doesn't bend over and kiss America's asshole= political dickbag

Got it.

Isn't there a bridge you should be under, waiting on some goats to go tripping by?

hardinparamedic:Norfolking Chance: I know i know it's not like America has a history of trying to remove heads of states they don't like with poisoned or exploding cigars or anything.

Because if America wanted Chavez removed with poison, or exploding Cigars, they wouldn't have done it by causing cancer. They'd have done it with poison, or explosives. You know, things guaranteed to kill people?

You don't really get the fact that poisoning someone doesn't work like that, right? Giving someone cancer is hard to do, even with exposure to carcinogens. It's not a sure-fire thing. And it's not even a sure-fire way to get rid of someone. Cancer is treatable. In addition to that, a poison would have caused something along the lines of a Leukemia. Chavez had a solid tumor. In fact, he had it removed and debulked SEVERAL times before his eventual death from metastasis.

I know it doesn't but how many times in the last 60 years have people opposed to US backed interests in Central and South America died in ways that have been traced back to the CIA or their "friends"?

Norfolking Chance:I know it doesn't but how many times in the last 60 years have people opposed to US backed interests in Central and South America died in ways that have been traced back to the CIA or their "friends"?

Norfolking Chance:hardinparamedic: In other news, Venezuelan Scientists are more along the lines of Dr. Krieger from Archer, and have no understanding of how cancer works, or why the US wouldn't use that if they wanted to regime change a political dickbag anyway - they'd use a bullet or a bomb into his daughter's quincenera.

Why does CNN reprint Agitprop from Venezuela anyway? It's stuff like this that should make you go "Huh. Those people really are batshiat insane."

I know i know it's not like America has a history of trying to remove heads of states they don't like with poisoned or exploding cigars or anything.

Sure, America has a history of trying to remove heads of states they don't like. But they're usually a lot more important than Hugo Chávez ever was.

And on another note, could we please spell his name correctly? It's Hugo Chávez, not Hugo Chavez . There's an accent mark.