1.Read
in isolation, youth's assignment of error--that the court "erred by
entering a juvenile judgment ordering the youth to pay $4565.26 to the victim,
when the victim had only $250 in out-of-pocket costs, and the rest was paid by
her insurance company"--appears to frame the correct issue. Youth's
argument in support of that assignment, however, is directed exclusively to the
question whether an insurance company is a "victim" for purposes of
ORS 419C.450.