Monday, October 31, 2011

Joe Nathan told reporters during a
ceremony for the dedication of the baseball field which will bear his name at
Stony Brook University in New York that the Mets “are going to be on my radar”.

Seeing as
this was in New York and covered by local reporters, it is only natural that
the question regarding the Mets’ closer vacancy comes up. I do believe
that his answer is more lip service than a genuine interest in the team. That
said, there will be plenty of teams who should have him on their radar as well. His
second-half
performance suggests that he is capable of providing high-quality work and
his recent injury history coupled with his age likely equates to a bargain
price (in years and dollars). In the TwinsCentric Offseason GM
Handbook, we have him scheduled for a contract for two-years at $7 million
per.In my
personal offseason blueprint, I had encouraged re-signing Joe Nathan for the
$7M but after more consideration – and depending how the market develops for
Nathan – I’m leaning towards giving Glen
Perkins a chance as a close and build the bullpen from the bottom up rather
than the top down. Perkins has the capability
and stuff to be a solid closer and in the small sampling he compiled in
2011, he seemed to work well in high leverage situations (2.83 xFIP). This
would save the team $5 million to address other needs.

Regardless of who assumes the closers role, the Twins bullpen needs plenty of attention this offseason - one way or another.

Newsday’s Ken
Davidoff released his annual MLB free agent rankings and predictions. Among
them, Davidoff
thinks that the Phillies closer, Ryan
Madson, will sign with the Twins for a three-year, $27 million contract.

Madson has
been a very productive reliever in the Phillies bullpen since 2003 but last
season was his first sustained shot at being the team’s closer. He responded
well by working in 62 games while posting a 2.37 ERA with a solid 62/16 K/BB
ratio. He’s armed with a mid-90s fastball that he complements with a devastating
changeup – one that has been baseball’s best since 2009 according the
Fangraphs.com’s pitch value (25.3 runs above average). This past season opponents
missed on 57% of their swings while hitting just .085 off of it.He’s a high
strikeout, low-walk rate type of reliever that the Twins under normal
circumstances would be interested in. The problem is I just do not see the
Twins investing three years in to any one for the bullpen. After all, it was
one of the reasons (for better or worse) they refrained from re-signing either Jesse Crain or Matt Guerrier at the end of the 2010 season.

Again, similar to the Nathan situation, I believe the Twins would be better served not committing that money to a closer but earmarking that payroll towards filling other needs in the rotation, bullpen and middle infield.

One potential
Twins starting pitching target, Hisashi
Iwakuma, made his intentions known regarding his desire to play in the US, saying
he was going to “exercise international free agency.”

The Twins
have had interest in the 30-year-old Iwakuma as recently as last winter so
there will likely be explorations with his agent to see what sort of money he
will be looking for. Last year, he was rumored to have been seeking a high sum
out of Oakland to which the A’s were not willing to pay. Now, without the hindrance
of purchasing his negotiating rights from his Japanese team, Iwakuma figures to
make it to the MLB as a B-level free agent this year.He’s stacked
up inning in Japan and completed plenty of games. So if a better option like
Mark Buehrle is not willing to leave Chicago, Iwakuma shares a similar profile
to Buehrle and could draw attention for other suitors. In theory, he’s got
better stuff (including a splitter that has been compared to Dan Haren’s) but
it is hard to tell if that will play well on this side of the Pacific as those
pitchers making the transition have had mixed results.

"I
spoke with Joe and his agent this morning, and expressed our interest in
re-signing [him]. We will remain in contact with them as we move forward into
the free-agent process.”

In
the TwinsCentric Offseason GM Handbook,
we noted that the closer free agent pool is littered with similar arms to
Nathan and we pegged his as the fifth-best among right-handed closers on the
market. We estimated that his contract would be approximately two-years, $14
million – a very reasonable rate given his performance record, age and injury history.
The question is: Would that be a good investment for the Twins?

Yes, Nathan
came back a bit prematurely last year and was cuffed around (a
fact that was definitely predicted). From April through May, he worked 15.1
innings, allowed 15 runs on 17 hits and posted a sad 15/9 K/BB ratio. In that
time he received swinging strikes on another 8%. That figure was particularly
disheartening considering the lowest rate he held since converting to a closer
with the Twins was a 12% swinging strike rate.

Because of
these results, he went on the DL and then the Twins sent him to Rochester to
try to work through some stuff. ESPN1500’s
Phil Mackey reported that during his time with the minor league club,
Nathan was able to work through some scar tissue that had formed on his elbow,
providing him with a great range of motion in his throwing arm. After breaking
up the scar tissue, Nathan’s season got back on track. In his final 31
appearances, he worked 29.1 innings allowing only 11 runs and held a
significantly better 28/5 K/BB ratio coupled with an opponent average of .193
(not to mention, 11 saves in 12 opportunities). What’s more is that in the
season’s final two months, he had increased his swinging strike rate to 11%.

Thanks to dissipated
scar tissue, Nathan was able to turn his season around. First, he was able to
regain velocity on his fastball:

Joe Nathan’s 2011 Fastball Velocity

Month

Miles Per Hour

March/April

91.3

May

91.7

June

92.6

July

93.0

August

93.3

September/October

91.9

(via Fangraphs.com)

As you can
see, Nathan peaked a bit in August before losing some heat on his fastball.
This is perfectly normal. Due to it being his first year back since 2009 as
well as the natural
bell-curve effect of pitcher’s seasonal velocities, a decline at the end of
the season is not unexpected. Still, the improvement in not only his velocity
but also his fastball’s effectiveness in the second-half of the year was
impressive.

Since he no
longer had the build-up on his elbow restricting his motion, Nathan was able to
spin his slider – arguably his best pitch – better in the latter portion of the
year.

In the
first-half of the season, he struggled to locate the pitch where he wanted it.
You can see that visually here:

This
scatterplot of sliders resulted in a whiff rate of 13.3% on this pitch.
Comparatively, this was a pitch that held a 21.3% whiff rate from 2008 to 2009.
Clearly, lacking his velocity combined with a substandard slider, opponents
were able to tee up on the pitches they liked instead of fishing for a slider
darting out of the strike zone or a fastball above it.

Following his
recovery in Rochester, Nathan returned with a much more lethal slider. Over the
course of the next few months, he increased his whiff rate to 24.6% while
spotting his slider down-and-away from right-handed hitters:

This improved
secondary offering complemented his jazzed up fastball which changed hitter’s
line of vision much better than in the season’s first-half. The results were more strikeouts and less solid contact.

At 37 years
old in 2012, he’s no spring chicken but the progress he made in final three
months of 2011 signifies that he is certainly capable of holding down the
backend of the Twins bullpen for the next two seasons.

Friday, October 21, 2011

Twins relief pitcher Glen Perkins let the cat out of the bag through his Twitter account, telling the world before the organization could announce it that he was the recipient of the team’s Pitcher of the Year Award in addition to winning the Most Improved Award.

Perkins put together a phenomenal if unexpected season in the bullpen. After injuries eroded his velocity which was hitting 97 miles per hour in 2007 yet had dropped to 89.7 as of 2009, he was suddenly able to dial it back up again – averaging 94 miles per hour on his fastball. With that solid foundation, he expanded the strike zone with his slider leading to one of the best out-of-zone chase rates of the year (37.8%). He posted solid conventional numbers – a 2.48 ERA and 65-to-21 strikeouts-to-walks ratio in 61.2 innings – and according to Fangraphs.com, Perkins finished the year with the 11th-highest Wins Above Replacement among all relievers.

Without question, his newfound velocity played a significant role in his rebound but it is his slider that was the real weapon. As noted above, Perkins was able to throw his slider out of the strike zone and incite plenty of swings. What’s more is that the majority of those swings on his slider proved fruitless as he held a 40% swing-and-miss rate on the pitch says Inside Edge’s data. All in all, Perkins’s slider was 9.9 runs above average by Fangraphs.com’s measurement. That was the fifth-best among all sliders.

Interestingly enough, it is a pitch that he did not incorporate into his repertoire until he came up to the majors. In 2009, Perkins told Seth Stohs that he was spending time refining the pitch, one that he developed midway through the 2008 season:

“I ramped up my offseason workouts and also spent much time talking to people and also practicing throwing my slider. It is a pitch I started throwing midseason and I am committed to making that a reliable pitch for me.”

But it is clear that his success with the pitch goes beyond just being dirty. Perkins simply knows how to use his arsenal. In a sit-down with Upper Deck Report’s Brandon Warne this summer, Perkins outlined a scenario which explains why he has been so dominating against hitters, particularly when using his slider:

“I find that I’ll throw a fastball or two, and if they’re late, I know that I can throw a slider and that they’re going to have to cheat to try to hit the fastball, and before they can stop themselves, they see it’s a slider. That’s been the thing for me, mixing the fastball and the slider, and throwing them at the right time, whether it’s starting with the slider or finishing with the slider. Throwing those pitches at the right time and recognizing what the hitter is trying to do, and using that to my advantage has gone really well for me.

The other day, McGehee was late on two sliders, and I threw three more. Two were bad, and then the third one was down-and-in where I wanted to put it, and he swung over it. He was probably cheating on the fastball, and had to get his hands ready. It was a situation where I recognized what he was trying to do, and went the other way. I think that’s as much as anything like command, velocity and movement, is trying to realize what a hitter’s trying to do to you, and adjusting from there. But obviously, the harder you throw, the easier those things are to do.”

Here we see that aforementioned slider he threw to the Brewers’ Casey McGehee:

What we see is excellent location of his slider, placed in a spot where a hitter can do nothing but flail over the top of it. Because McGehee is cheating fastball, he is expecting the pitch to be a knee-high fastball and commits to swinging. Halfway home, the bottom drops out on the ball and it darts towards the ground, leaving McGehee unable to hold up his swing. The Brewers’ infielder is not the only one to fall victim to this approach as Perkins had K’d nearly 30% of right-handed opponents faced – a remarkable rate for a left-handed pitcher.

As analyst try to make sense to Perkins’ meteoric rise in the pen, some wanting to believe it was a fluke or the product of a small sample size, being healthy, developing a deadly slider and having keen understanding of his opponents has propelled his 2011 season. He has become a pitcher, not just a thrower.

Perkins is one player the Twins will need to make a decision on this winter but the decision shouldn’t be too difficult. He is arbitration eligible and his salary figures to double however the $1.8 million we have estimated in the TwinsCentric Offseason GM Handbook is a very reasonable cost for a dominating relief pitcher. On the free agent market, his service may have been twice that over three years. So, while the rest of the bullpen personnel remain a mystery, Perkins will be a fixture in the ‘pen come spring.

So, the man
they were willing to commit $9 million to over three years is now destined to
try to earn a job in the spring. For the majority of fans, this suits them just
fine. Better yet, he can go hang out with the center field trees – wherever
they are now.

When he was initially
signed, I broke
down some of the available footage of Nishioka’s Japanese playing days. At
the time, I caution that the video clips, compiled by Beverly Hills Sports
Council (also Nishioka’s stateside agent), were very likely cherry-picked to
serve the purpose of inflating his value. Even with this in mind, the majority
of his swings seemed impressive as the ball was jumping off his bat. Yes, he
pulled off with his front hip on the left-side but overall, Nishioka was
driving the ball on a rope to all fields. The thought was that his foundation
seemed solid enough to support a somewhat smooth transition.

Of course, the
transition was about as smooth as Stearns County bathtub whiskey.

Truthfully, I
was a bit stunned at what showed up in a Twins uniform. This version of
Nishioka resembled nothing of the player that was poking line drives every
which way but loose.

Early in the
season, he struggled to stay in with his front side while batting left-handed
and opponents picked him apart by pitching him away. He constantly made weak
contact. In fact, his .014 isolated power average was the lowest against
right-handed pitching in all of baseball (among those with a minimum of 130
plate appearances). According to Inside Edge’s scouted data, they have Nishioka
marked with a .135 well-hit average against righties – lower than Drew Butera
and Rene Rivera.

"His upper body is not as strong as I think it can be. He
can gain upper-body strength, and that is going to help him with his swing.
Perry has a good program written up for him, and I know Nishioka [already] has
a good program over there."

While adding upper body strength is a good thing (so long as
he doesn’t focus too much on his glamour muscles), Nishioka’s problems at the
plate seem to stem from his legs, not his arms. Take a look at these two side shots of
his swing from the left side, one from his Chiba Lotte days and one from this
past season against New York:

There is a
noticeable difference that stands out to me which may be a source of his
offensive incontinence as a lefty - his launching point. The launch point is
when a hitter’s weight is shifted back before he launches forward towards the
pitch. Let’s take a look at some of Nishioka’s swings from the left-side
throughout the years:

In the first
clip, an image of him from the ‘06 NPB season when Nishioka was a 22 year old in
his fourth year of professional baseball, you see him implementing a very
aggressive leg kick and in position to drive his front leg forward.

In the second
clip –one from Nishioka’s latter Chiba Lotte days – we find that the launch
point is scaled down a bit. Still, what you see from this position is that
Nishioka is driving his front hip forward as a significant amount of his weight
is poised on his back leg.

Meanwhile,
this year, Nishioka seems to have once again refined his mechanics and reduced
the amount of lift in his front leg (or at least varied the angle in which he
brings his front leg back). He also is shifting less weight on his back leg
thus staying tall more throughout his swing. The end result appears to be more
arm and wrist in his swings than engaging his lower half and weak contact
overall.

Now, to
speculate, there are plenty of reasons why Nishioka would pare down his stride.
The first being due to the increased velocity in America versus Japan –
simplifying his swing would aid him in making more contact. The aggressive
approach would also leave a hitter more vulnerable to off-speed pitches as
well. Perhaps he made the adjustments on his own. Another theory is that the Twins encouraged
Nishioka to trim down his lower half for the same reasons listed above. The
club prides itself on putting the ball in play and may have wanted Nishioka to
focus on contact and using his speed (or rather the once projected speed).
Regardless of the why, it has made Nishioka one of the worst offensive producers
the Twins have seen in a long time.

Ideally,
for someone like Nishoka, more effort is needed from his legs and hips in order
to generate some semblance of pop. This is very similar to Alexi Casilla. Dating back to 2010, Casilla had a
pared down swing from the left-side, relying mostly on his upper body to do the
work. Unfortunately, this resulted in more bouncers and slow rollers than
anything else. At some point, Casilla incorporated his legs more and he had
much more success:

“Casilla is able to engage his lower-half much
better. Because of that, despite putting plenty of balls on the ground, we see
the ball jump off his bat much better than it had at the beginning of the
season. So, while grounders still become outs at high percentage of the time,
putting them into play at a greater velocity is bound to turn into hitters more
frequently than thoseof the slow bouncer variety.”

So, is
Nishioka hopeless? Did the Twins just piss away $9.25 million in salary and
another $5.3 in securing his negotiating rights?

One winter
ago everyone assumed Casilla was cooked. His small adjustment proved that he
could compete, posting a 779 OPS from mid-May until his mid-summer injury.
Looking back at the old footage of Nishioka, I can see him capable of having a
much improved season in 2012.

Without
touching upon the atrocious defense – that’s
a whole ‘nother problem right there – if the organization hopes to salvage
some of the investment spent on Nishioka on the offensive side of the ball, the
focus should be on getting him to return to his pre-major league days.

Friday, October 14, 2011

Christensen’s
statement may be based on some internal rumblings or it may be a residual of
the Twins pursuit of him last offseason. Last winter, the Twins came in a
distant second to the Oakland A’s for the rights to negotiate with Iwakuma and
his agent. Minnesota offered $7.7 million to the Rakuten Golden Eagles but was thwarted
when the typically miserly A’s submitted a bid of $19.1 million.

After
Oakland secured the rights, the negotiating part took a wrong turn for the Bay
Area organization. According to reports, Iwakuma and his agent were seeking a “Barry
Zito-like” contract (seven-years, $126 million) while Billy Beane went all Moneyball on them and offered a
four-year, $15.25 million deal. Unable to work out a deal, Iwakuma went back to
the Golden Eagles for the 2011 season.

Iwakuma,
now an outright free agent this winter negating the need for a posting fee, has
hired
a new agent and figures to be one of a handful of talented pitchers on the
market. Outside of CC Sabathia and CJ Wilson, Iwakuma likely falls in the same
category as Edwin Jackson and Mark Buerhle (minus the experience). If he prices
similarly to those two, he could be looking at a contract worth $8-to-$11
million per year.

The
30-year-old right-handed pitcher has some legitimate sink which would incite plenty
of ground balls. Like the rest of the Twins’ cadre of pitchers, he fits the
bill as a pitch-to-contact type with his 89-to-92 mile per hour sinking
fastball. He comes equipped with a variety of pitches and speeds, using a
curve, slider, splitter and a shuuto. The results in his Nippon career have
been solid – a career 3.25 ERA with a 107-69 record while strikeout out 18.4%
of batters faced.

“His
split-finger fastball averaged 86 mph, and he got three inches of hop and eight
inches of tail on the pitch due to spin. Adding in the effect of gravity,
the splitter dropped about nine inches relative to his four-seamer. He
threw the splitter 31 percent of the time to left-handed batters and 20 percent
of the time to right-handed batters. It was his main strikeout pitch,
accounting for five of his nine strikeouts in the last three games of the
WBC. Batters swung and missed at 34 percent of his splitters, which is an
excellent mark.”

With that
vast repertoire and an out-pitch like his splitter, his ceiling could be like
that of the Angels’ Dan Haren, who has average velocity but throws a variety of
pitches and has a devastating split-finger fastball.

The
question is: Would he be a good fit with the Twins?

Without
a doubt, the Twins need to address the depth of their rotation. Last year’s
team floundered when several members were sidelined over long periods of time
(Baker, Blackburn and Liriano) and were hurt even further when those who were
expected to perform simply did not (Liriano and Duensing). This put a lot of stress
on a weak bullpen. In theory, Iwakuma, who has worked deep into games in Japan,
throwing 48 complete games in his career, would be a decent solution.

But
that doesn’t necessarily make him the ideal solution either.

The
second concern is regarding targeting another pitch-to-contact arm. While I
have no qualms with the method, it only works provided the right infrastructure
is in place. Last season showed that when the infield defense is substandard,
those types of pitchers who allow balls to be put into play suffer heavily. If
the team is not willing to upgrade defensively around the diamond, pursuing an
arm that is capable of missing bats is likely a better investment at this
point.

Finally,
how much does the Twins front office trust their scouting staff when it comes
to pulling talent out of Japan? The ballad of Tsuyoshi Nishioka should already
give them pause. Sources say that the scouting department was none too thrilled
by Nishioka’s skills overseas but yet the staff signed off on his ability
before handing him a $9.25 million deal. Would they actually return to that
well so soon after Nishioka’s disastrous year?

In
the end, the Twins will likely be looking for another starter and Iwakuma will
be a name you hear repeated again this offseason.

Friday, October 07, 2011

Much like Festivus on
Seinfeld, the conclusion of the Twins
season always brings forth the “airing
of the grievances” – most of them center on the big ballpark downtown.

This year, Delmon
Young, fresh off of punishing the Yankees, took time to explain his recent
outburst (6-for-19 with 3 HRs including the game-winner in Game 3) and why he
underperformed in the season’s first-half. According
to Young:

“Target Field changed my whole field of hitting.
I usually tried to use the middle of the field, and if I pulled, I pulled, and
if I went the other way, I went the other way.

At Target Field, when those balls turn into
can-of-corn outs and I was fighting for playing time over there, I couldn’t
afford to have a flyout to deep right field. I had to try to pull the ball to
get a base hit.”

This is not the first time Young sounded off
about his former team’s configurations. Last year, Young groused about the same
issues, telling reporters that if he tried to hit the ball to left or
left-center the ball would die.

When you review the 2011 home run hit chart by
right-handed batters at Target Field, you will notice that Young was absolutely
correct in his observation:

Just three balls were hit by right-handed batters
that cleared the fence to the opposite field and another five to center field.
Comparatively, in 2009 the Metrodome had 20 home runs by right-handed bats which
went out to right and center fields. Clearly, if you are going to have
right-handed power in Minneapolis, it needs to be as a pull hitter.

Reviewing his batted ball splits, it is no small
wonder that Young suffered at Target Field and felt the need to turn on the
ball. In the past two seasons, Young has held the lowest line drive rate to the
middle of the field (14.1%) among qualified hitters. While he was successful at
sneaking those grounders back through the box, plenty of his fly balls were
likely stood up in center field.

JJ Hardy, who struggled offensively at Target Field,
last year hitting .252/.313/.340, had told reporters in the spring following his trade to the Orioles that in
2010 he was trying to “stay on top of the ball and go the other way more.” The
Orioles hitting instructor took one look at this approach and said – to
paraphrase – “aw HELL no.” In Jim
Presley’s eyes, Hardy was a power-hitting shortstop, one that he witnessed
first-hand while coaching in Florida and Hardy was crushing for the Brewers. So
Hardy made some adjustments and began turning on pitches ferociously.
The end results would make any Twins fan sick to their stomachs as the castoff
shortstop popped off for 30 home runs and a .491 slugging percentage.

Would simply having Hardy pull the ball more have
paid off for the Twins? It is hard to say but this method does not always bear
fruit at Target Field as Danny Valencia proved.

When Valencia put up his impressive rookie
numbers in 2010, he had demonstrated that he was able use the big part of the
field – hitting line drives to center at a 22.5% clip. This aided him at home
where he hit .386/.418/.561. This year, Valencia was called out by his manager for trying to “swing for the fences” and abandoning the technique that had him
producing well. Valencia wound up pulling the ball more and hitting line drives
to center at a significantly lower clip (15%). He ended up hitting more home
runs at home (9) but hit .257/ .307/.400 at Target Field overall. In this
instance, focusing on pulling the ball was an obvious detriment to his game.

Young is far from the only Twin to make this
observation about the right field region. Justin Morneau made a fairly public spectacle by ranting about the fencing to the
Star Tribune almost
immediately after the Twins were bounced from the playoffs a year ago. When he
returned to action this season following his concussion, part of his issue at
the plate was that he was pulling off on the ball with his front hip. Although I attributed it to rust back in
May, perhaps this was an ill-fated attempt to try to yank the ball down the
line more where lefties have had more home run success.

Jason Kubel said that he changed his approach in
2010 too, attempting to pull the ball down the line but ultimately wound up
going back to his previous method when all he had to show for it was a few
extra home runs. This season, he said he worked on hitting more line drives
(which he did to some extend) and this resulted in more doubles rather than the
long fly outs in the fly-killing power alleys. Through his first 102 plate
appearances he was hitting .351/.392/.511 with nine doubles to just two home
runs but then his numbers leveled off as he started to elevate more fly balls for long outs:

"That's why when I started out this year, I was more
contact-oriented, focusing on hitting line drives all over the place. It was
working out. But now I'm starting to get balls in the air, and I've hit 'em
good. But they're outs. So it's tough. I'm not as big or as strong as Jim
Thome; I can't just do that."

Kubel’s first two months of the season showed that the key to
having success is simply keeping the ball on a rope. Now, as an impending free
agent, there is a strong chance that he will not be with the team in 2012 and
once again, the Twins will have to have someone new decipher how to hit in this
ballpark.

What does this mean for the Twins and their offseason
shopping list?

If the Twins are looking for power this offseason
that needs to come in the form of hitters who have shown pop as pull hitters
but mostly have had success using the middle of the field. As we have seen the
past two seasons, players who have a tendency to drive fly balls to the power
alleys and deep center are likely going to be demoralized for 81 games a year. Target
Field can reward dead-pull hitters or those who hit line drives to the middle
of the park (one of the reasons Valencia had strong numbers in ’10).

One such free agent that may fit that bill is
Derrek Lee. True, in his first foray into the American League he appeared
overmatched when hitting .246/.302/.404 in 364 plate appearances in Baltimore.
However, his second-half with Pittsburgh was fairly strong. Plus, he
exemplifies the attributes that just might play well at home: Dating back to
2009, Lee has the sixth-highest line drive rate up the middle (22.9%).

Another name on the free agent list that may be
intriguing is Magglio Ordonez. While he has suffered a rash of injuries and is
aging quickly, he showed life at the end of the season as he hit .385/.397/.477
in his final 19 games. Similar to Lee, Ordonez has a high line drive rate in
the middle of the field (22.6%) since 2009.

Most teams target players whose skill set will
play to their home-field advantage. The Red Sox gave Adrian Gonzalez a butt-ton
of money because of his ability to drive the ball the other way. As a
left-handed hitter, this meant that he could punch double-after-double off of the
Green Monster. The Yankees traded for Curtis Granderson who they felt would
perform well with the extremely short porch in right field. The Twins should
recognize that their home field advantage – while not as performance-enhancing as
Boston or New York’s – is the spacious center field. By targeting up-the-middle,
line drive hitters the Twins will position themselves well to combat opposing
teams who remain flustered by the home stadium’s frustrating effects.

Monday, October 03, 2011

Carl Pavano allowed 262 hits this year – which is
the 169th time someone has allowed 262 hits or more since 1961. None
too impressive, right? Yet it is just the fifth time since 2000 that someone
has allowed 262 hits or more – mostly because of the inning allotment necessary
in addition to the patience required by the front office to allow that sort of
punishment to continue. The others on that list are Sidney Ponson (265 , 2004),
David Wells (266, 2000), Livan Hernandez – twice (266, 2001, 268, 2005) and
Tanyon Sturtze (271, 2002). Excellent company.

Speaking of
Pavano, his fastball was the second-worst in baseball last year. According to
Fangraphs.com’s pitch value statistic, his fastball was 24.5 runs below average
(or approximately two and a half losses). Interestingly, his regularly battery
mate, Drew Butera, also proved to be quite inept when it comes to fastballs. He
found himself at 23.9 runs below average when hitting against fastballs (or
approximately two and a half losses). This was the worst mark in the American
League.

Pavano’s 42%
chase rate on his offspeed pitches was the best in the American League and
second in baseball behind some guy named Roy Halladay (45%).

Ben Revere led all of baseball in grounders with
a 68.5 percent ground ball rate. This has been the highest rate of bouncers hit
(outside of Roadhouse of course) in Fangraphs.com’s batted ball warehouse. Fangraphs.com’s data starts in 2002.
Likewise, Revere also holds the lead for fewest fly balls hit (11.6%) as well.

What’s more
is that his strength was not pulling the ball this season: Revere’s .389 OPS on
balls that he pulled is the lowest in baseball. Part of the reason for this is
because he was terrible at making solid contact when being pitched inside.
According to Inside
Edge, Revere’s well-hit average on pitches inside was .036 – the
fourth-worst in baseball.

Revere put
60% of the fastballs thrown to him in to play – the second-highest rate in
baseball behind San Francisco’s Jeff Keppinger (61%).

Don’t throw
Cuddyer a change-up (like many left-handed pitchers did), he crushed them to
the tune of 9 runs above average (roughly one win). Overall, his .341 batting
average on offspeed pitches was the fifth-best in baseball.

Nobody
squared up on right-handed pitching like Joe
Mauer did. His 27.7% line drive rate against righties led the majors. On
the other hand, his backstop mate, Drew Butera, held baseball’s lowest OPS
against righties at .403.

If you threw
anything to Mauer over the midsection of the plate (horizontal), the chances
are that it was thwacked pretty hard. The often-injured catcher/DH/first
baseman/right fielder held a .273 well-hit average on pitches in the zone. The
next closes was Boston’s David Ortiz at .217.

Drew Butera’s .449 OPS narrowly missed being the
worst in Twins history thanks to a 4-for-8 outburst in the final week of the
season. The honors for worst offensive season with a minimum of 250 plate
appearances still belongs to Jerry Zimmerman and his .436 OPS in 267 plate
appearances. For what it’s worth, Butera joins the blessed Twins hall of
sub-.500 OPS members including Houston Jimenez (1984), Danny Thompson (1970),
Ron Clark (1968), Al Newman (1991) and, of course, Zimmerman (1967).

The Twins had
two of the three worst hitters for pitches down in the zone. Butera led all players
with a .032 well-hit average while Tsuyoshi
Nishioka was the third-worst at .040.

Butera’s .142
batting average on fastballs was the worst in baseball.

Battle of the
soon-to-be free agents: Jason Kubel
had the fifth-highest batting average on line drives in play (.817) while
Cuddyer had the eleven-lowest batting average on line drives in play (.603).
One thing this could tell potential suitors is that Kubel’s 2011 season was on
the lucky side while Cuddyer was not nearly as charmed.

Denard Span and Jim Thome both chased after just 10% of non-competitive pitches
(those well out of the strike zone) – tied for third-best in baseball.

Francisco Liriano’s ability to get strike one was
horrendous this year. His 49.4% first-pitch strike rate was the sixth-worst in
a season since 2002. He also threw his fastball for a strike just 53% of the
time – the worst among starters.

Nearly 30% of
the batters Liriano faced went to three ball counts (27% vs 20% league average).
That was the highest mark among qualified starters.

When Liriano
does hit the strike zone, he’s clearly hard to hit. Liriano’s 21%
swinging-and-miss percentage on strikes was the second-highest in baseball
trailing only Atlanta’s Brandon Beachy in that department.

Just 16% of
runners Scott Baker put on base
scored. That was the third lowest rate among starters.

Kevin Slowey lost 8 starts in a row. The most recent
time that happened was by Boof Bonser in 2007. Oddly enough, in their
respective losing streaks, they both worked 44.2 innings, allowed 59 hits each
and had 36 runs scored on them.

About OtB

"Parker Hageman is the Michael Cuddyer of Twins bloggers -- not the flashiest guy out there, but a solid everyday player. Hageman produces spot-on analysis ... relying on in-depth stats and lots of charts. He takes a sober, performance-based view of players, letting others fall for a player's heart or his leadership skills in the clubhouse. Hageman is one of the four pillars holding up the Star Tribune's TwinsCentric blog."