How does the world look at Israel’s operation in Gaza?Interview with Jonathan Rynhold

The Editorial BoardJuly 24th

“Israel, the Palestinian Authority, the European Union and the United States are all on the same page. Everybody thinks that Hamas shouldn’t win or come out of this looking well.”

Dr. JONATHAN RYNHOLD is educated at London School of Economics, and currently works as Director for the Argov Center for the study of Israel & the Jewish People at Bar-Ilan University in Israel.

TQT: Why is Israel attacking Gaza now?
Rynhold: Israel does not want to fight this war. It started with Hamas firing rockets. The Israeli government will stop if Hamas stops. The final trigger was when there was an attempt by Hamas to come through a tunnel and attack Israeli cities in the south. At that point, the prime minister made a decision to go into Gaza, to deal with the tunnels. And because Hamas posed a direct threat to Israeli civilians in the south of Israel around the border, there was wall-to-wall consensus for the ground troops to enter Gaza.

TQT: Has Hamas been successful in any attacks?
Rynhold: Due to the success of the Iran Dome, rockets killed no Israelis, but the tunnels represented a direct threat to Israeli civilians, which can only be dealt with by ground troops.

TQT: What categorizes the developments that have taken place the last 24 hours in the conflict between Israel and Gaza?
Rynhold: On the Israeli side, the Israeli military has concentrated on finding and destroying the tunnels in Gaza that lead into Israel. The goal of Hamas has been to lead their people to kill Israeli civilians. Stopping that is the prime Israeli objective. Hamas has laid down Gaza as a battlefield, and what they are attempting to do is drawing IDF, the Israeli soldiers, into an urban battle, because that is their home territory. One of the things that has changed in the last 24 hours, according to a report from Israeli officers in the field, is that Palestinians are now fleeing, maybe a hundred thousand or more, which means that they are not listening to Hamas, who are apparently offering payment to civilians for staying in the areas.

TQT: What do you mean when you say that Hamas offering payment to Palestinians who stay?
Rynhold: A report from a senior Israeli army officer, Uri Gordin, Commander of the Nachal Brigade, verified that Hamas was offering money to Palestinian civilians if they stay in the areas in which there is combat .

TQT: In your opinion, what will it then take to end the conflict?
Rynhold: The Egyptians came up with a proposal for a ceasefire and Israel said yes, but Hamas said no. For Israel it is clear that Hamas is not prepared to stop fighting. Hamas started raising the demands during the ceasefire, which clearly indicates that Hamas is not interested in a ceasefire in the first place.

TQT: John Kerry continuously meets with the Egyptian government, in order to discuss the ceasefire proposed by the Egyptian government. But the Egyptian government is notoriously against Hamas, due to the relationship between Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. Taking that into consideration, is it not a given that Hamas refuse to participate in the ceasefire agreement?
Rynhold: No. In the very beginning, the political leaders of Hamas were actually willing to go along with some version of that ceasefire, but the actual decision-making is being done by the military wing of Hamas, who are in the bunkers. They simply do not care what is happening to their population, because it gains them sympathy throughout the world.

TQT: In line with your previous answers, we can agree that Hamas was weakened before this escalation of the conflict. But has the invasion, however, increased the popular support of Hamas and aided them in general recruitment?
Rynhold: Before the current conflict, Hamas were on a political low; they faced an economic crisis and did not have much political support. I think that it is simply too early to say what the consequences will be at this point. Right now, I am sure that hatred of Israel is very, very high. But the real question should be, who will get the credit if the situation improves and if the situation deteriorates?
I think that European governments are unusually supportive of Israel in its conflict, unequivocal almost, because everyone understands – given what is going on in Iraq, that it is critical that the Islamists do not make more gains anywhere. I think that the chief objective that Israel shares with Egypt, the United States and Europe is that Hamas should not get the credit for any gains the Palestinians make in Gaza as a result of a ceasefire agreement.

TQT: Hamas has been working with people in Turkey and Qatar in order to create their own terms for a ceasefire. Do you think that Israel would be interested in participating in such talks? And should they participate in such talks?
Rynhold: The answer to that is quite easy. No, they are not and no, they should not. Basically Egypt has worked very hard the last months to shut down the tunnels through which Hamas imports weapons. Egypt is a close ally of the US and the West. Turkey and Qatar, on the other hand, support the radical islamists. They have compared Israelis to the Nazis. Qatar is just playing a cynical game to gain influence. But I think the question which is more to the point, is if the US can get the Qatari leaders to drop out of the game or to move close to the Egyptian proposal, and through this push Hamas away from the only real international support is has.

TQT: What would the consequence be of pushing Qatar into being more critical of Hamas?
Rynhold: It would isolate Hamas still further. I think that the interesting thing is that Israel, the Palestinian Authority, the European Union and the United States are all on the same page. Everybody thinks that Hamas shouldn’t win or come out of this looking well. That is why the Egyptian ceasefire proposal is the one to go for. It is good and unopposed all over, except for Hamas and Turkey.

TQT: Netanyahu and others have defined Hamas as a terrorist organization on equal terms with Boko Haram and Al-Qaeda. Is this a fair comparison? After all, they are democratically elected.
Rynhold: You can debate the stuff about them being democratically elected and whether that is really the case. They took power in Gaza by throwing people of the Palestinian authority out of the windows and shooting them. Terrorists are groups that target civilians and terrorize the civilian population – that is what Hamas is. They are openly anti-Semitic, not only anti-Israel. That is what their charter is about. And they make no compunction about it. They use their citizens as shields. They are a terrorist organization and are detrimental to the well-being of Israelis and Palestinians. The difference between them and other groups, is that they are controlling a certain territory, through the use of pressure, they can be made to be pragmatic and restrained.

TQT: How would Israel go about changing the nature of Hamas?
Rynhold: Israeli policy is designed to deter and to impose costs. Even with a terrorist entity, it is possible to manage the conflict, however not possible to resolve the conflict, but Hamas’ raison d’être is not to resolve the conflict. It is on possible to manage the conflict, though in an imperfect way. It is a modest strategy in the conflict and that has really been Israel’s strategy in dealing with Gaza. Netanyahu is simply trying to point out, that when Israel is trying to fight this war, there is a very clear moral distinction between a democracy and a terrorist organization. In other words, we have a just cause to fight this war. We are in the right.

TQT: Where do the civilian casualties stand in this equation?
Rynhold: It is just very difficult, when you are fighting this kind of war not to hit civilians, even if you are not aiming for civilians. Hamas shields themselves in hospitals and it puts you in an impossible situation. Netanyahu is trying to clarify to the Western public, that this is the kind of war we are fighting. We are not saying that the rules of morality doesn’t apply to us per say, it is just too difficult of a situation.

TQT: Touching upon rules of morality and just war, the blockade of Gaza has been in place since 2006, and is according to several human rights watchers and NGOs illegal under international law. Are these accusations substantial?
Rynhold: The blockade against Gaza has not been the same blockade as it was. It was only put in place when Hamas took over. In other words, when Israel withdrew from Gaza with all the settlements and all 8.000 settlers, it didn’t impose a blockade. The blockade came as a result of Hamas using Gaza to launch missiles at Israeli civilians. However, the blockade also had another purpose, to create a situation in Gaza that is sufficiently unpleasant, yet not a humanitarian disaster, in order to turn the population against Hamas. This has failed, and in my personal opinion it would never have worked. The idea is demilitarizing Gaza in exchange for a very large package of international aid and to that the Palestinian Authority will presumably say yes and Hamas will presumably say no. And the point of that is to show that Hamas does not have the best interests of its population at heart. I think that it is widely accepted in Israel now that if you could guarantee that what goes into Gaza would not be used in a military capacity, then it would be worth opening the borders. The idea is that if you can get rid of the security problem, you can get rid of the blockade.

TQT: We see demonstrations all over the world against the blockade and the invasion of Gaza. Do you see a scenario in which the international community would react against Israel?
Rynhold: We need to start by recognizing distinctions between government and public. Two groups, radical Muslims and the radical left, largely carry out these demonstrations against Israel. If one looks at consistent polling, the overwhelming majority of the public is indifferent. This is not representative of a massive opinion for boycotting Israel. Technically, the EU would also have enormous difficulty in implementing any kind of collective policy. Only if Israel was to do something very stupid and annex the West Bank tomorrow, I could see the scenario happening

TQT: Is it possible for the Israeli military to fall back from Gaza in a foreseeable future?
Rynhold: They don’t want to stay there. What they would like to do is to destroy those tunnels and then get out. I don’t know how many levels they can go up without taking over Gaza, but to evict Hamas who is very deep in the ground would take six months. That is not something that is desirable for Israel.

TQT: What happens next?
Rynhold: To be honest with you, I really don’t know. We are moving towards an attempt to deal with the Qatar issue and to solidify the Egyptian proposal. In the military arena, it is about Israel destroying those tunnels and I think that those two things are central. I don’t see a ceasefire in the next 24 hours but these things are so fluid. I will seriously watch inter-Arab diplomacy. The Arab League has backed the Egyptian proposal, and I would expect to see the Americans and the Arab League twisting Qatar’s arm. That would leave Hamas in a very difficult position.

THE AUTHORS: JOHAN GREVE PETERSEN (f. 1991) Johan has previously studied at the United World College of the Pacific in Canada, but is now his final stages of receiving a BSc in anthropology from University College London. Beside his studies, Johan is active in the UWC movement and on the board of Danish Students Abroad. SAHRA-JOSEPHINE HJORTH (f. 1985) is the CEO of hjorthGROUP and a PhD fellow in migration and social media. Sahra-Josephine also holds a MA and a BA in International relations. ILLUSTRATION: Prime Minister Netanyahu visits President Obama at The White House, 2011 [photo: The White House]

Andrew L. Peek on Syria:

There is really no element of the fight that seems to be going well

“For the last two, probably three years, the deal we have been willing to settle for has grown significantly less good” Andrew Peek was a strategic advisor to the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan and foreign affairs advisor to two U.S. Senators. He is currently a professor and director of Claremont-McKenna College’s Washington […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 8. Aug, 2015

“Americans are so hung up on the democracy thing. Get over it.”

Roby Barrett on the Middle East

“Americans are so hung up on the democracy thing; I think they have got to get over it. You have to look at the region, not just over the past 20 years, and not just for what you want to see, but how it has functioned over the past. That is where we have been […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 4. Aug, 2015

Why does Turkey hesitate?Interview with Nick Danforth

By Troels Boldt Rømer TQT: Why has Turkey decided to join the anti-IS coalition now? And why did Turkey accept an influx of fighters and weapons through Turkey and to the Syrian battlefield for so long? Danforth: Turkey’s involvement in Syria has left Erdogan in a position where he has a great deal at stake […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 12. Oct, 2014

“The way I see it, there are actually serious contradictions between democracy and liberalism”

REFLECTIONS: Chua Beng Huat

By Jelis Bosse and Helle Asbjørn Sørensen BACKGROUND. In less than 50 years, Singapore has evolved from a poor, colonial outpost without natural resources to an economically successful hub of international trade. Today, 5.4 million people reside in the city-state and with a tenfold rise in GDP per capita, the average Singaporean is now wealthier […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 13. Aug, 2014

Gaza. What would a ceasefire deal look like?Interview with Prof. Robert Brynen

“Clearly the American vision of a ceasefire is not identical to the Israeli one. I think that the United States accepts that the blockade of Gaza is excessive and that the demands that the blockade be relaxed are appropriate, regardless of where they come from, Hamas or otherwise, and that it should probably be part […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 1. Aug, 2014

Gaza. “The blockade is legal but not smart”Interview with Dr. Natan Sachs

“The blockade is legal but not smart. The effects on the civilians are terrible. Israel could have allowed civilian life in Gaza to continue. But the fundamental key to change is not in the hands of Israel. It’s in the hands of the Palestinians. At the end of the day, if the Palestinians are ruled […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 27. Jul, 2014

Gaza. “Any peaceful settlement has to include Hamas and I think it is important for the EU and the US to realize this”.Interview with John Dugard

“I think it is wrong to portray the present conflict as self-defense on the part of Israel. Israel is taking military action in order to maintain and enforce its occupation of Gaza. It is an occupying power that wishes to remain an occupying power and it is taking enforcement action to maintain that occupation”. JOHN […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 26. Jul, 2014

How does the world look at Israel’s operation in Gaza?Interview with Jonathan Rynhold

“Israel, the Palestinian Authority, the European Union and the United States are all on the same page. Everybody thinks that Hamas shouldn’t win or come out of this looking well.” Dr. JONATHAN RYNHOLD is educated at London School of Economics, and currently works as Director for the Argov Center for the study of Israel & […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 24. Jul, 2014

Gaza. What does Israel hope to achieve?Interview with Daniel Levy

“The Israeli establishment says: “How would anyone else respond to having rockets fired against them?” And the answer is: Well, no one else is maintaining this kind of an occupation”. DANIEL LEVY is an Israeli political scientist. He has previously served as a special advisor to the Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and as a […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 22. Jul, 2014

Can ISIS hold what it has conquered?Interview with Reinoud Leenders

“I think the success of ISIS might be the source of its downfall. From that perspective, it is only a matter of time before the Iraqi armed forces can launch an effective counterattack” Troels Boldt Rømer of TQT speaks to Dr. Reinoud Leenders, Kings College London TQT: Many people have been surprised that ISIS – […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 28. Jun, 2014

What stokes sectarianism in the Middle East?Interview with Fatima Ayub

QUOTES: – A lot of what we call sectarian politics is purely cynical manipulation in times of crisis for the purpose of preserving and extending power – Lighting a match in the forest is easy, but putting out the fire is very difficult. In Iraq and Syria it’s the task of a generation to deal […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 2. Dec, 2013

Has Russia become more powerful? Interview with Steven Pifer

“The increase in Russian power, in the case of Syria, is due to a series of poor decisions made here in the US and not an actual increase in Russian power” By Sahra-Josephine Hjorth og Nadja Arøe Simonsen Is the world we live in unipolar, bipolar or multipolar? PIFER: In references to nuclear weapons it […]

“The United States has shown a great deal of public deferrence to Saudi anxieties and positions, but I also suspect that the United Stated will be willing or able to live with an aggravated or aggrieved Saudi Arabia if it means that a settlement with Iran on the nuclear issue is a potential political outcome. […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 30. Oct, 2013

Will Iran and the US make a deal?Interview with Rouzbeh Parsi

“[Rouhani] wants a deal but he is also going to stick to Iran’s red lines. We are dealing with a greater flexibility on the part of Iran on the modalities of reaching a goal which everyone is familiar with by now: Iran is going to have enrichment of uranium on their own soil. Anything else […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 16. Oct, 2013

The Middle East: How does Israel look at the crises in Syria and Egypt?Interview with Eldad Beck

“Whatever illusions the Israeli public had about reaching peace with its Arab neighbours are really fading away. Many Israelis asks themselves why Israel should make more compromises in a situation where everything around them is burning.” Eldad Beck is Middle East correspondent for the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, ynetnews.com and author of the 2009 book […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 29. Aug, 2013

Afghanistan: Is the Taliban ready for change?Interview with Ahmed Rashid

“The peace-lobby in Taliban don’t want an ongoing civil war. They know perfectly well that if they continue fighting after the Americans and the other Western countries leave, then there will be a civil war that will go on and on and continue indefinitely. And this time the government, the Afghan army, the Northern Alliance, […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 13. Jul, 2013

From Snowden to Syria: How does Putin look at the world?Interview with Steven Pifer

QUOTE. “If you flipped the situation around, and we had a Russian version of Snowden stuck at Dulles International airport, we would not turn him over either” – Pifer. Interview by Sahra-Josephine Hjorth with Steven Pifer, Director of the Brookings Arms Control Initiative. Pifer is senior fellow with the Center for 21st Century Security and […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 10. Jul, 2013

Will Iran change its nuclear policy? Interview with Matthew Kroenig

“The supreme leader Ali Khamenei has been facing this choice between having a nuclear program or having a healthy economy since at least 2005, and every time he has chosen to opt for a nuclear program. I do not see any reason to think that Khamenei will change this course”. Interview by David Jano with […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 1. Jul, 2013

Ask the question today

To join our team of global volunteers, write us at: redaktionen@raeson.dk. Include a brief CV plus a relevant short piece of writing (in English)

Artiklen blev bragt den 30. Jun, 2013

We Are The Question Today

CLEMENT BEHRENDT KJERSGAARD (born 1975) is the founder and editor-in-chief of TQT. Bilingual IB from the United World College of Hong Kong (1992-1994), MA in Philosophy, Politics and Economics from the University of Oxford (1994-1997) and BA from the University of Copenhagen (1998-2003). Since 2004 he has been a broadcaster with the Danish Broadcasting Corporation, […]

Artiklen blev bragt den 30. Jun, 2013

This is the Question Today

The Question Today is a world politics magazine aimed a global audience. Totally independent, based in Copenhagen, Europe but aimed at a worldwide audience, financed by advertising and – in time – subscriber content. For TQT a global network of interviewers will interview experts and decision makers in a Q&A-format, focusing on those issues that […]