On 10/17/07 5:46 PM, in article , "Jer"
<> wrote:
> George Kerby wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/17/07 4:16 PM, in article ff5ur4$7qq$, "Marcin"
>> <> wrote:
>
>>> These are my favorite photos: http://www.pbase.com/abulafia/image/51810643
>>> and http://www.pbase.com/abulafia/image/51810644
>>>
>> Yeah. The blonde on the right has a nice body. Bet she works out regularly.
>>
>
>
> Really? You using that new x-ray scanner at the airport to see through
> all that clothing?
>
Naw. New Radeon special beta version video card. You should get one!

"Annika1980" <> wrote:
> Chris Savage wrote:
>> On 2007-10-17, Jorge san Jose <> wrote:
>>
>> >http://www.pbase.com/image/51810616
>>
>> I thought it was the 1DmkIII that had the focus issues?
>
> I also would have expected more from that equipment. The guy's got a
> f/1.0 lens and ISO 3200 yet the indoor pics are still too dark.
> Must've been a dark room.

All the ones I saw were at ISO 400. He should have shot at 1600 unless he
needs really enormous prints.

But using a 1DsII with the 50/1.0 as a snapshot camera is rather overkill.

Hey, if those galleries are yours, then thishttp://www.pbase.com/abulafia/cyprus
is in Cyprus, not Greece (my browser here doesn't like greek fonts, so
maybe that's what it says; in which case, ignore this).

David J. Littleboy wrote:
> "Annika1980" <> wrote:
>> Chris Savage wrote:
>>> On 2007-10-17, Jorge san Jose <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/image/51810616
>>> I thought it was the 1DmkIII that had the focus issues?
>> I also would have expected more from that equipment. The guy's got a
>> f/1.0 lens and ISO 3200 yet the indoor pics are still too dark.
>> Must've been a dark room.
>
> All the ones I saw were at ISO 400. He should have shot at 1600 unless he
> needs really enormous prints.
>
> But using a 1DsII with the 50/1.0 as a snapshot camera is rather overkill.

Those pix were two years ago; hopefully he's learned something since
then. I esp. like http://www.pbase.com/abulafia/image/51810623 My theory
is if you're going to ignore the horizon, do it up big! And what was
that one about anyway? I mean, it's an o.k. derriere, but hardly stunning.

On 10/18/07 10:00 AM, in article, "David J. Littleboy"
<> wrote:
> "Annika1980" <> wrote:
>> Chris Savage wrote:
>>> On 2007-10-17, Jorge san Jose <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/image/51810616
>>>
>>> I thought it was the 1DmkIII that had the focus issues?
>>
>> I also would have expected more from that equipment. The guy's got a
>> f/1.0 lens and ISO 3200 yet the indoor pics are still too dark.
>> Must've been a dark room.
>
> All the ones I saw were at ISO 400. He should have shot at 1600 unless he
> needs really enormous prints.

I was going to say the same thinjg. However, toward the end (dancefloor), he
was using 1600 and 3200 ISO. Overall, I would have Cced to less yellow/green
though. But I do like the idea of not overpowering with strobe.
> But using a 1DsII with the 50/1.0 as a snapshot camera is rather overkill.
>
Lotsa dinero, maybe?
> David J. Littleboy
> Tokyo, Japan
>
>

Share This Page

Welcome to Velocity Reviews!

Welcome to the Velocity Reviews, the place to come for the latest tech news and reviews.

Please join our friendly community by clicking the button below - it only takes a few seconds and is totally free. You'll be able to chat with other enthusiasts and get tech help from other members.
Sign up now!