Obama reportedly considering 2-day strike on Syria

White House officials say the United States may launch a limited military strike on Syria as early as this Thursday as the intelligence community prepares to release a report justifying action and allies are rallied.

Senior officials in the Obama administration told the Washington
Post for an article published on Tuesday that the White House is
weighing a limited strike on Syria and said on condition of
anonymity that “We’re actively looking at the various legal
angles that would inform a decision.”

According to the Post, the likely response from Washington would
be a sea-to-land strike from the Mediterranean that would last no
longer than two days and would not be directed towards targets
where the chemical weapons arsenal is believed to be stored.

But while an attack is all but imminent and will likely be
launched from warships already mobilized in the Mediterranean by
the week’s end, public support in the US has teetered towards nil
as of late. The Obama administration says there is undeniable
proof that chemical weapons were used on civilians outside of
Damascus on August 21, but a five-day-long Reuters poll taken
during that time concluded only nine percent of Americans favor
intervention.

Notwithstanding that lack of support, US Secretary of State John
Kerry hinted Monday at a response which will jolt Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad and ideally worsen the odds that his
regime will implement chemical warheads again.

Despite insistence from Assad and allies in Russia that the
Syrian government is not guilty of using chemical weapons, Sec.
Kerry said during a press conference on Monday that “our
understanding of what has already happened in Syria is grounded
in facts, informed by conscious and guided by common sense.”
Kerry called Assad’s reported attempt to cover-up the alleged use
of chemical weapons “cynical” and said, “President
Obama believes there must be accountability for those who would
use the world’s heinous weapons against the world’s most
vulnerable people.”

One day earlier, Sec. Kerry admitted that Pres. Obama was
considering his options with regards to a strike and was to meet
with lawmakers in Congress as well as with international leaders.
According to the Post article, however, the president may forego
getting approval from Capitol Hill and will instead rely on
striking Syria due to “undeniable,” as the White House
puts it, war crimes.

“The administration has said that it will follow international
law in shaping its response,” Karen DeYoung and Anne Gearan
wrote for the Post, adding, “But much of international law is
untested, and administration lawyers are also examining possible
legal justifications based on a violation of international
prohibitions on chemical weapons use, or on an appeal for
assistance from a neighboring nation such as Turkey.”
Additionally, the US has already received assurance of support
from Britain, France and Turkey.

According to senior administration officials who spoke to CBS
News on condition of anonymity, Pres. Obama met with his national
security team this past weekend and has ordered that a
declassified intelligence report showing the rationale for any
attack on Syria be released before it occurs.

While only nine percent of the respondents polled in the Reuters
survey between August 19 and 23 said they want the White House to
respond to Assad’s reported use of chemical weapons immediately,
25 percent said they would favor intervention if the US concludes
with certainty that those warheads were illegally used. A
Reuters/Ipsos poll from earlier in the month found that 30.2
percent of Americans would support intervention if Assad is
linked to using chemical weapons.

Sec. Kerry said the indiscriminate slaughter of women and
children apparently being carried out by the Assad regime
constitutes a “moral obscenity.”