George W. Bush's Legacy is Darker Than Some Would Have You Believe

As George Bush opens his presidential library, many have been quick to revisit the former president’s legacy. The good, the bad, and the ugly parts of the Bush administration have been reassessed once again and among the re-hashers is Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer. In his article aptly titled "The Bush Legacy," Krauthammer starts off by plainly stating that President George Bush’s legacy isn’t that “he kept us safe.”

I nod my head in agreement and continue to read, already knowing in my mind where the rest of this article go – an assessment of how terribly the Bush administration handled the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, how those said wars were basically fought on a credit card, prevalence of torture as an official U.S. policy, etc. Which is why it came as a total shock to me when Krauthammer argued pretty much the opposite of everything I was thinking he would say, instead arguing that not only did Bush keep us safe in the eight years he was president, but that he “created the entire anti-terror infrastructure that continues to keep us safe” today.

“Indefinite detention, rendition, warrant-less wiretaps, special forces and drone warfare, and, most notoriously, Guantanamo” – all things we, as a nation, are so proud of – Krauthammer argues we owe endless praises to Bush for creating.

Krauthammer, however, doesn’t believe that Bush’s achievements end at just creating the anti-terror infrastructure – because, of course, how could we forget to thank Bush for the two wars that were left inconclusively and will cost America somewhere between $4 trillion to $6 trillion?

Worse, Krauthammer attempts to argue that Bush had successfully overthrew the Taliban, decimated Al-Qaeda and drove both of them away from their safe havens. Well, if that’s the case, would someone care to explain to me what we’re still doing striking drones in Pakistan and Afghanistan?

In other words, Krauthammer has got it wrong and this rosy picture he is attempting to paint of George Bush’s presidency is simply not his legacy.

Bush’s legacy something dark and horrible – something even members of his own party want to distance themselves from, as seen from his absence in the 2012 presidential election campaign process.

Bush’s true legacy is his decision to invade Iraq under the pretense of finding purported weapons of mass destruction and freeing the Iraqi’s from the perils of living under the harshest of dictators, Saddam Hussein. The WMDs have yet to be found, and the only way he was successful in freeing the Iraqis is if, by free, you mean dead.