No Min Woo Loses Lawsuit Opposed to SM Entertainmentjun2yng July 21, 2016 0 No Min Woo’s criminal dispute with SM Entertainment has after all reached an end. On July 21, it used to beprinted that the superstar lost his break suit against SM.

In November 2015, No Min Woo sued SM for repayment of damages incurred because of SM’s deficientcontrolwhilst No Min Woo changed into amongst TRAX — from 2004 to 2006 — as smartly equally afterward. “After I left TRAX, SM Entertainment didn’t do any leadership at all. Now nothandiest did they not be offering me any opportunities to do song or act, they careworngeneratingadministrators and production corporate executives and interfered in my entertainment activities,” acknowledged No Min Woo.

During the trial, No Min Woo claimed, “According to SM’s demands, I agreed to increase my exclusive contract, and the completeduration of the contract comes to about 17 years. After signing an unfair contract in which copyright for any customary compositions or musical productions were SM’s for 10 years, I didn'tget preserve ofanything else in return. As a result, the exclusive contract should be invalid, as it is going against social order.”

No Min Woo also cited mental stress, having had to play the drums even as a guitarist and having his activities interfered with.

However, the court ruling states that, because of theinadequate evidence, they are not able to rule the contract between SM and No Min Woo invalid. The court also said evidence proving SM’s careless management and interference in No Min Woo’s entertainment paintings was insufficient.

Their criminal representative Joon Kyung released an reputableremark on May just 19:

Lee Haein and Lee Suhyun have filed a lawsuit in regards to the invalidity and nonexistence of an exclusive contract against SS Entertainment on Might also 4.

The duration of the exclusive contract is excessively long and the scope of the contract is too extensive that it necessarily affects their freedom referring to economic activity. They did no longerget preserve of an explanation of the contents of the exclusive contract and not even saw the contract.

The verbal promise of debuting Lee Haein and Lee Suhyun inside of a year used to beno longer kept. They failed and not notedto offer vocal and dance education that idol trainees need.

With the ensure of debuting, they persuaded them to sign the unjust contract. We plan on having SS Entertainment lawfully terminate the exclusive contracts via this lawsuit.

Meanwhile, SS Entertainment responded, We learned about Lee Haein and Lee Suhyuns lawsuit in the process the news. We are opening up other channels for discussion. We plan on saying our stance after that.

SM Entertainment has announced that it had won a lawsuit opposed to EXO's former member Tao.

Korean entertainment firm SM Entertainment printed on Tuesday that it had won a Chinese lawsuit against Tao (Huang Zi Tao) for the entertainer failing to pay back the volume he owes his former agency. SM Entertainment published a observation following the finish of the lawsuit.

Tao reportedly gained a "temporary payment" from SM Entertainment following his absence from EXO in April, 2015. The Intermediate People's Court in Qingdao, Shandong, China declared that Tao violated the law by way ofno longer returning the charge to SM Entertainment following his formal departure from EXO.

SM Entertainment explained that the agency acted "sincerely" and gave Tao the transient payment so asto turn its just right intent to stay Tao happy.

Following his absence, Tao filed a freelance nullification lawsuit against SM Entertainment in a Korean court.

SM Entertainment's statement, translated by AllKpop, also declared that Tao "ignored the same old morals as a member of society."

The statement also reiterated the reality that SM Entertainment will continue its quite so much ofcomplaints against Tao and two other former EXO members, Kris ( Wu Yi Fan) and Luhan, who left EXO after filing contract nullification contracts.

All 3 sometime EXO individuals are these days active in the Chinese entertainment industry.

Tamar Herman is a multi-media journalist and the co-founder of KultScene. She is a freelance creator and reproduction editor, and has written for MTV Iggy, Noisey, and Paste Magazine.

SM Entertainment Wins Lawsuit Opposed to Taokokoberry January 4, 2016 0 On January 5, SM Entertainment printed news about their lawsuit against former EXO member Tao (Huang Zitao).

Their legitimateremark reads:

SM has ongoing lawsuits against EXO participants Wu Yifan (Kris), Luhan, and Tao for violating their exclusive contracts and engaging in unlawful promotions in China. Among those lawsuits, SM filed a lawsuit against Tao for failing to pay off SM on October 13, 2015. An intermediate court in Qingdao, China made the verdict that Tao is to repay SM Entertainment in additionhobby for the not on time payment.

After Tao left EXO without realizeclosing April, he asked SM for brief payments. SM supplied the transitoritybillsso as to faithfully satisfy our role as his agency. However, regardless ofobviously knowing the bank account number, he failed to pay back the temporary payments in the promised time. Then he went against commonplace sense and filed a lawsuit to nullify his contract.

SM will now notstayin this ruling and should pursue felony action against all movementswhich areillegal and violate SM and EXOs rights and interests. We canconstitutethe nice intentions of sufferers and paintings to save youwreck toward Korea and Chinas cultural exchanges that used to beled toon account of Kris, Luhan, and Taos illegal activities and breaches of contract.

SM Entertainment had released an professionalremarksayingthat they've won a lawsuit opposed to former EXO member Tao. The firm has won the lawsuit referring to Tao failing to pay back the volume he owes the company.

The following is the public statement made through SM Entertainment:

SM Entertainment is lately in complaints against EXO participants Kris, Luhan and Tao for violating their exclusive contracts by enjoyingunlawful promotions in China. Among the ones is the 'temporary charge claim' lawsuit against Tao made on October 13, 2015, where Tao violated the obligation to repay. It's beengoverned by the Intermediate People's Court in the Qingdao, Shandong, China that Tao will have topay off SM Entertainment for the transient payment that he has not on time to pay back.

Last April, after Tao left EXO without notice, he asked for a transitority payment from SM. SM Entertainment sought after to sincerely do the total lotthey might equally his agency and gave him his temporary payment.However, even if Tao obviously knew the bank account of the involved party, he failed to pay back the quantity in the promised time. And he went against commonplace sense and went to the Korean court to report a lawsuit to nullify his contract.The Chinese competent court ruled that Tao violated the law and had a breach of promise, leading to 'right prevailing in the end'.As a public figure, Tao did anything elseyet act morally and informally had illegal entertainment activities below a other Chinese company.He clearly violated the 'sportsmanship of a contract' and 'God's theory of integrity' which China emphasizes. He unnoticedthe same old morals as a member of society.SM Entertainment will now not just remain with this ruling, but will take prison measures to confront all action in regards to the lawful interests of SM and EXO.We might bein a position toconstitutethe great intentions of the victims, and save you any breaktaking place between Korea and China's cultural replaceon account of Kris, Luhan and Tao's violation of the law and behaviour of breaching their promise.

Breaking: Tao Officially Submits Lawsuit Opposed to SM Entertainment to Finish Exclusive Contractcrystalcove August 24, 2015 0 The respectablefelonyprocedure has began for Taos departure from EXO and SM Entertainment.

According to local news source Kookmin Ilbo, Tao has officially submitted via his legal rep a lawsuit to contest his exclusive contract with SM Entertainment to the Seoul Central District Court today, August 24 KST. His legal rep is reportedly the similar Luhans and Kriss.

Until now, Tao has simplestnicely been out of his group and SM Entertainment after his father announced this beyond April the singers choiceto leave the group. He has since started his solo activities in China with the unlock of a mini album.

SM Entertainment has issued an official response. It acknowledged IT will firmly respond to all of Taos unlawful activities through proceedings and other legal means, either in China and in Korea.

A university’s fall festival poster with a photo of a woman organization member has been posted online and is being sued for violation of rights.

The poster encompasses a undies pictorial photo of a girl group member beneath the heading of “Adult Bar,” and is accompanied with suggestive captions reminiscent of “flip your position” and “I would like to take the pig skin off.”

The head of the coed council and the student frame who posted the poster explained, “This is a menu that we made to take benefit of in a bar. We didn’t understand it would purpose trouble. We ask for forgiveness to the entertainment agency.”

The acknowledged entertainment agency, however, did no longer settle for their apology and is making plans to take prison action against promotion of lewd activities.

An associate of the agency stated, “We will sue for defamation and violation of symbol rights. We plan to file a lawsuit a while this week.”

The police branch responded, “The lawsuit hasn’t been filed yet yet we will pass forward with the investigation once it's miles filed.”

SM Entertainment has announced that they've now filed a lawsuit against Tao and the production corporate that produced Tao"s solo album.

The firm released a commentary similar to the former statements they've got released against Kris and Luhan, announcing, "Our lawsuit against Tao and the album production visitors that aided in Tao"s illegal superstar activities have officially been registered in the Beijing Court on September 18."

The agency also said, "Tao had already been in touch with a other agency in April, 2015 and began celebrity activities and proceeded with album production, leaving the team and the agency without notice. In this way, Tao used the status he completed from EXO to look on adverts and broadcasts, and on August 24, 2015, he filed a lawsuit against us at the Seoul court. till the court makes its ultimate decision, the contract between SM and Tao is still in effect, and Tao will have to uphold the contract and can't elevate out illegal celebrity activities."

The agency also wired that the illegal activities of Kris, Luhan, and Tao are negatively affecting the colourful cultural change between Korea and China, and that Sm will do whatever they are ready to to additional advance the cooperation and cultural exchange between the 2 countries.

Singer Son Dambi has lost her repayment case against a cosmetic brand for which she become once a fashion between 2010 and 2011.

Son Dambi become once active as the fashion for the emblem for approximately a year, between 2010 and 2011. at the contract, she specified that she best sought after her photographs for use domestically.

However, in 2013, photographs of the singer were hung up in 8 places in China to look the brand’s products. Subsequently, she sued the cosmetic brand for breaching their outdated contract and demanded compensation.

The brand denied the allegations of distributing the selling subject matter to the China stores, claiming that they simply sold their products to those stores.

The court governed in choose of the cosmetic brand, stating, “It is tricky to resolve that the emblem dispensed those photographs in China. These photographs of Son Dambi had been widely dispensed since she become once a fashion for the company, without problems available by way of internet.”