Abstract

In the last decade, the field of consumer neuroscience, or neuromarketing, has been flourishing, with numerous publications, academic programs, initiatives, and companies. The demand for objective neural measures to quantify consumers' preferences and predict responses to marketing campaigns is ever on the rise, particularly due to the limitations of traditional marketing techniques, such as questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews. However, research has yet to converge on a unified methodology or conclusive results that can be applied in the industry. In this review, we present the potential of electroencephalography (EEG)‐based preference prediction. We summarize previous EEG research and propose features which have shown promise in capturing the consumers' evaluation process, including components acquired from an event‐related potential design, inter‐subject correlations, hemispheric asymmetry, and various spectral band powers. Next, we review the latest findings on attempts to predict preferences based on various features of the EEG signal. Finally, we conclude with several recommended guidelines for prediction. Chiefly, we stress the need to demonstrate that neural measures contribute to preference prediction beyond what traditional measures already provide. Second, prediction studies in neuromarketing should adopt the standard practices and methodology used in data science and prediction modeling that is common in other fields such as computer science and engineering. This article is categorized under: Economics > Interactive Decision‐Making Economics > Individual Decision‐Making Psychology > Prediction Neuroscience > Cognition

Desmedt,, J. E. (1962). Auditory‐evoked potentials from cochlea to cortex as influenced by activation of the efferent Olivo‐Cochlear bundle. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34(9B), 1478–1496. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918374

Dijksterhuis,, A., Aarts,, H., & Smith,, P. K. (2005). The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Oxford series in social cognition and social neuroscience. The new unconscious (pp. 77–106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Johansson,, P., Hall,, L., Sikström,, S., Tärning,, B., & Lind,, A. (2006). How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(4), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONCOG.2006.09.004

Lee,, N., Chamberlain,, L., & Brandes,, L. (2018). Welcome to the jungle! The neuromarketing literature through the eyes of a newcomer. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1–2), 4–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2017-0122

Levy,, D. J., & Glimcher,, P. W. (2012). The root of all value: A neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(6), 1027–1038.