Dear White Women: Did You Know How You Walk Can Actually Be ‘Racist’ – No, This Isn’t Satire!

The formerly well-respected newspaper has tossed their reputation for actual journalism aside and decided to attempt to cash in on the Social Justice issues of the day.

Take this column written by Greg Howard, NYT writer, that has decided to air his grievance of the persecution of the black man walking on the sidewalk with white women.

In his rant, he says that only white women don’t move aside for him.

In seven years of living and walking here, I’ve found that most people walk courteously — but that white women, at least when I’m in their path, do not.

Sometimes they’re buried in their phones. Other times, they’re in pairs and groups, and in conversation. But often, they’re looking ahead, through me, if not quite at me. When white women are in my path, they almost always continue straight, forcing me to one side without changing their course. This happens several times a day; and a couple of times a week, white women force me off the sidewalk completely. In these instances, when I’m standing in the street or in the dirt as a white woman strides past, broad-shouldered and blissful, I turn furious.

Bro, maybe you should move.

Instead of complaining about ‘white woman walking privilege’, maybe you could be a gentleman and move aside. It would be the courteous thing to do.

Or did your mama not raise you right?

I turn furious because in these instances I feel small. I always get out of the way, because I was taught at a young age not to bodycheck random people. But I also get out of the way because, as a black man, I’ve learned that bodychecking, bumping or even rubbing against a random white woman can be personally hazardous. So I acknowledge other pedestrians, and reroute. White men and all people of color do the same to me. They offer some form of acknowledgment that we are in each other’s path, that I am there at all.

So, white women enrage him?

Because the big, bad white women make him feel small.

Dude has some real issues here, don’t you think?

Why only and specifically white women? Do they refuse to acknowledge me because they’ve been taught that they should fear black men, and that any acknowledgment of black men can invite danger? Do they refuse to acknowledge me because to alter their route would be to show their fear? Do they not see me? Can they not see me?

Maybe they don’t think you’re a threat. Ever consider that?

Perhaps the fact that they’re not moving out of the way when a black man on the streets of New York City walks past them debunks that whole stereotype that all white people are ‘taught to fear black men’.

Or is it that you want them to be overtly racist?

Seems to me that these ‘white women’ are damned if they do and damned if they don’t.

If they move aside quickly and hold onto their purse, Howard would be writing about the overt racism of the women fearing black men.

But now that they’re not doing that, it’s racism to push him out of his space on the sidewalk?

Puh-leez.

Why haven’t I ever just walked headlong into a rude white woman? What lessons tug at me, force me off the sidewalk, tell me that my personal space is not necessarily mine? Because explicit in every white woman’s decision not to get out of my way is the expectation that I’ll get out of theirs.

Is that misogyny?

Or just plain, old fashioned manners?

I’d like to think it was the latter. Perhaps your Mama did raise you right.

Whenever I ask white women I know why they don’t reroute for black men, they invariably express ignorance. Whenever that happens, another question always arises: Wait, am I crazy? But then I ask black men. Invariably, they know what I’m talking about.

A couple of weeks ago, I asked an Asian friend if he had the same experience of white women not getting out of his way. He said no. For whatever reason, white women see him just fine.
Source: New York Times

This is the New York Times, folks.

I’m not really sure what the ‘white women’ are supposed to do in Howard’s world.

Should they move aside for a black man and be submissive to his ownership of the sidewalk?

Sounds sexist, if you ask me.

Should they clutch their purses and run without making eye contact?

He’d complain that was racism.

Perhaps the problem isn’t with the ‘white women’.

Maybe it’s Howard himself.

Looking for examples of ‘racism’ like this is simply petty and reading into things that really aren’t there.

Doug Giles, best-selling author of Raising Righteous And Rowdy Girls and Editor-In-Chief of the mega-blog, ClashDaily.com, has just penned a book he guarantees will kick hipster males into the rarefied air of masculinity. That is, if the man-child will put down his frappuccino; shut the hell up and listen and obey everything he instructs them to do in his timely and tornadic tome. Buy Now:The Effeminization Of The American Male

There’s one thing that increasingly unites men and women these days. We can both agree that Liberals are losing their ever-loving minds. Now there’s a shirt that says just that.

Conveniently available in Both Ladies…

AND Men’s versions.

Either Liberals just don’t get it, or they are sick in the head. Probably both. Think about it: They want to have all of the blessings that come with living in a capitalist society such as modern medicine and technology. But they believe in socialism, which stifles innovation and progress.

They want to be protected by the police and the military, but they attack and criticize the men and women who protect us. They call conservatives “racists,” but it’s their own identity politics that have created race problems in the first place. After all, Democrats were the party of slavery!

They attack hunters, but have no problem wearing leather shoes or owning cars with leather upholstery! And of course, they believe guns kill people. Not the people that pull the trigger.

Well, here’s a shirt that sums it perfectly. Liberalism is a… MENTAL DISORDER.

And the best part? This shirt is made in the USA, printed in the USA, on an American-Made t-shirt press!

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.