What factors contribute to make a successful leader, how might your style of leadership vary to be successful when involved in individual, racket and team activities

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What factors contribute to make a successful leader, how might you style of leadership vary to be successful when involved in individual, racket and team activities The three basic leadership styles are: -Autocratic -Bureaucratic -Laissez-faire Autocratic Leadership Style This is often considered the classical approach. It is one in which the coach retains as much power and decision-making authority as possible. The coach does not consult performers, nor are they allowed to give any input. Performers are expected to obey orders without receiving any explanations. Creating a structured set of rewards and punishments produces the motivation environment. This leadership style has been greatly criticized during the past 30 years. Some studies say that organizations with many autocratic leaders have higher turnover and absenteeism than other organizations. These studies say that autocratic leaders: -Rely on threats and punishment to influence performers -Do not trust performers -Do not allow for performers input Yet, autocratic leadership is not all bad. Sometimes it is the most effective style to use. ...read more.

Middle

This style can be effective when: -Performers are performing routine tasks over and over. -Performers need to understand certain standards or procedures. -Performers are working with dangerous or delicate equipment that requires a definite set of rules to use the equipment. -Safety or security training is being conducted. -Performer is performing tasks that require handling cash. This style is ineffective when: -Work habits form that is hard to break, especially if they are no longer useful. -Performers lose their interest in their sports and in their fellow teammates. -Performers do only what is expected of them and no more. Democratic Leadership Style The democratic leadership style is also called the participative style as it encourages performers to be a part of the decision making. The democratic coach keeps his or her performers informed about everything that affects their work and shares decision making and problem solving responsibilities. This style requires the leader to be a coach who has the final say, but gathers information from staff members before making a decision. ...read more.

Conclusion

-It's easier and more cost-effective for the coach to make the decision. -The business can't afford mistakes. -The coach feels threatened by this type of leadership. -Performer safety is a critical concern. Laissez-Faire Leadership Style The laissez-faire leadership style is also known as the "hands-off� style. It is one in which the coach provides little or no direction and gives performers as much freedom as possible. All authority or power is given to the performers and they must determine goals, make decisions, and resolve problems on their own. This is an effective style to use when: -Performers are highly skilled, experienced, and educated. -Performers have pride in their work and the drive to do it successfully on their own. -Outside experts, such as staff specialists or consultants are being used -Performers are trustworthy and experienced. This style should not be used when: -It makes performers feel insecure at the unavailability of a coach. -The coach cannot provide regular feedback to let performers know how well they are doing. -Coaches are unable to thank performers for their good work. -The coach doesn't understand his or her responsibilities and is hoping the performers can cover for him or her. ...read more.

Related AS and A Level William Golding essays

watch TV, this means that they are less aware of the fast food industry and so might choose to eat more healthily. Media try to influence people to eat more healthily by making people aware of the advantages of being healthy.

* Holiday entitlement In the UK employees can expect around 4 weeks' paid holiday per year. In the public sector more holiday is often given, but this may be balanced against lower pay. * Pension schemes A good pension scheme can act as an incentive for many people who are concerned about security in retirement.

Normally the panel consists of the team leader of the department the job is for, the HR manager there is a set very specific process that is followed for each candidate and every applicant has to go through the process so everyone gets a fair chance.

Then, finally, performing, where they are working together and achieving their objectives. Good relationships will be formed which would not normally have been possible within their normal working environment as they would not have had the contact to allow them to be established.

We naturally direct our effort toward outcomes that help us fulfill our needs. The most important factor in the expectancy theory is effort- which is an individual's actual exertion of energy. The amount of effort people put forth depends on three factors: effort-to-performance (E-to-P)

Main justification is cost and living cost will be varied to other and main places. * Budget availability: To pay salaries to employee's available budget is also taken into consideration. Salary levels must be in limit of available funding. Salaries paid to staff are reflected by other organization paid salaries for same job.

We placed them here as they were places that many people drove by regularly, therefore, they will remember when, where and what event is taking place. However, in order for us to do this we have to get hold of the Hertfordshire Highway Agency.

Team leaders and supervisors can look back to a Gantt chart to make sure they are on track and not falling behind as well as making sure all the tasks are complete. Without the constant monitoring of a team, it is very unlikely that a team would be successful at achieving their objectives and can very quickly head off rails.