What is it about the Trayvon Martin case that a lot of people just don’t get? I was reading a news story about an old white man who was beaten by a group of 6 black boys after saying to them…Remember Trayvon Martin. And the 6 black youths were arrested and are now in jail awaiting trial.

But, yet people continuously want to point out Al Sharpton’s involvement with the Tawana Brawley fiasco or the Duke LaCrosse case. As if these two incidents are the quintessential equivalents of the Trayvon Martin case. Or somehow because a black person made false claims in these two cases, the case against Zimmerman is either false or somehow irrelevant.

And people are also making other comments about the 6 black youths vs. white man such as “if this were the other way around, it would be seen as a hate crime” or “Were is the FBI? Jesse? Sharpton? and every one else? Rally to take place at the Toledo Police station Monday april 9th at noon to demand justice in this case please be there. Please email me at mikeXXXX@yahoo.com if you plan to attend!”

OK. Who reading this is wondering to themselves at this very moment “what lack of justice are they speaking of that needs to be had in this case?” What exactly is it that is causing a problem for Mike shown above who is looking to go to a rally for justice in a case? It can’t be the fact that the alleged perpetrators are in jail, it can’t be that the wheels of justice are turning and quite quickly I might add. So is the only thing that would spell justice for Mike, would be for black people to rally around this white man and denounce the actions of the 6 black youths? Something he obviously has yet to do for Trayvon.

OK, Mike, for what it is worth…I think that it was horrible for those black kids to beat up this white man for whatever reasons they have. I hope that when all the evidence is revealed that it doesn’t show that they felt threatened when the man said to them to remember Trayvon Martin. Which he claimed was his way to, as he said; to show them we are all on the same side.

Because, unfortunately, if some white man said that to me, I would be fearful he was planning to make ME the next Trayvon Martin. And I would interpret him to mean DEAD. And thus might feel the need to protect myself from this could/would be Zimmerman knockoff. So, I guess that could be an excuse for them. Maybe, but we see there is no lack of excuses for Zimmerman as well.

I guess he (Mike) wants to see hate crime charges brought. That is fine “if” that is what he wants. But, at least he has solace in seeing the wheels of justice moving, the alleged perpetrators in jail and an actual investigation being done. And all this being done WITHOUT the victim’s family going to extreme measures of rallying a public outrage to get the same justice. Somehow this white victim just has the luxury of this justice automatically.

I would love for Mike there to show me the one case where a white person be it man, woman or child who was killed by a black man and that black man was allowed to go home WITH the murder weapon the same night as the killing, and no further questions asked by the police of that case. And the case closed after 7 hours of investigation that did NOT include any forensic, DNA, witness statements nor any other form of evidence outside of the perpetrators lone statement? I would LOVE for someone to dig that case up.

For anyone who is confused as to WHY black people are on board this case, it is because the crime was just set aside and no one wanted to look into it any further. This man whether white or Hispanic or as he classified himself white Hispanic, man killed an innocent unarmed person without any investigation to corroborate his story was allowed to go free. And the police had attempted to force the parents into accepting that the man killed their unarmed son in self-defense without a shred of evidence to back that statement up.

I don’t think that anyone would sit idly by and allow that to go unchallenged if that were their child or if this was some white kid walking in a predominantly black area and the black man were the alleged perpetrator. That is why this is so raw for the black community. This is NOT the first case of an unarmed black person shot dead at the hands of a person who did not get arrested, charged or eventually ruled innocent of any wrong doing.

And it is frankly unbelievable to me that anyone even needs to spell this out to them. I can’t believe that it is so hard to fathom why black people are calling for justice. Why is it so hard for some to identify with an obvious injustice no matter the race of the people? If the people heard this travesty without hearing the race of the people would they have a hard time understanding the outrage then?

Is this a case of willful ignorance in order to justify a group mentality that has always deemed the black man a threat no matter what situation we see them in? We have to keep black people under control no matter what the cost, situation or outcome of that situation. A lot of white people thought Rodney King was in control even though he was surrounded by 7 police officers who were beating him with batons as he lie on the ground. And a jury still believed that he could have stopped them at any moment.

A woman named Tarika Wilson was shot to death THROUGH her one year old baby and the cops who did it were deemed to have acted appropriated because of course this black woman holding a baby was still a threat to the police even though again unarmed. How many times do we need to see this very crime perpetrated upon members of the black community while those from the predominant white community make statements that it was understandable based on the so called fact that the white/non-black person pulling the trigger was in fear of an unarmed black who supposedly had all the control.

We allow the dominant predominantly white community to cry that blacks are so scary it is understandable that they pull the trigger when facing a black person in any type situation even if the story sound as outlandish as Zimmerman’s tall tales. When does the opposite occur in that blacks become so fearful of white people that we jump the gun in defense of ourselves against them?

Would this new reversal of fear be acceptable and we can then justify doing nothing at all or hearing about nothing being done and have so many members of society agree that it was justifiable to do nothing. Would we ever then see the members of predominantly white society see a case where Zimmerman is black and Trayvon is white and then tell the outraged people to just have a look at whatever case is out there at the moment which shows a white person killing or harming a black person and ask them why they aren’t outraged over that as well; even when the cases are ridiculously different.

It won’t happen because somehow we are again under a group mentality that white people are NOT a monolith. If one commits a crime, doesn’t mean I must fear them ALL. Yet, blacks do not, and have never gotten that same consideration. And in fact we deem blacks as negative actors even when the perpetrators are white. We have so many Susan Smith’s, Bonnie Sweeten’s, Ashley Todd’s, Bethany Storro’s, Michael Daragjati’s, Mary Turcotte’s, Charles Stuart’s and Brian Wells’ out there to feed this very stereotype for the masses like crack addicts scurrying for the last rock of crack.

How do we stop this? How do we back away from the precipice that we see ourselves on at this very moment? We all need to take a step back and understand that it is beyond time to start seeing things through the eyes of our black citizens as we already do those of our predominantly white majority.

Governor Perry is so desperate he’s pulling a Michelle Bachman. Now saying that a poor, poor lady with cancer told him that if someone doesn’t get rid of Obamacare that she will surely die. Somehow Obamacare will kill her. Now my question is exactly how will Obamacare kill her? Did it “give” her the cancer she is dying from? Will it stop her from continuing her current health plan IF she has one? Will it stop her from getting Medicare or Medicaid if she is getting that? Of course not!

What is it about the Obama healthcare plan that causes so much angst? Only a small part of the plan is even enacted and the rest doesn’t come into play until 2014. So, out of what IS enacted could any of these be killing this poor cancer ridden lady?

Could it be that the plan forces insurance companies to cover recommended preventive services without charging out of pocket costs: Services like mammograms, colonoscopies, immunizations, pre-natal and new baby care are now covered, and insurance companies are prohibited from charging deductibles, co-payments or co-insurance?

Do you think that making insurance companies cover preventative services and the like are killing her, is it stopping her care? Probably not, so let’s keep looking.

How about this one:

Give her an opportunity to appeal coverage decisions by her insurance company: Consumers are guaranteed the right to appeal insurance company decisions to an independent third party.

Well I am sure as hell if her insurance company says they don’t want to pay for any new treatments her doctor feels will help her cancer, that she would think having the RIGHT to appeal would be very much needed. In fact it COULD be the one thing that saves her life. Well, let’s keep looking, since we know for a fact this ain’t it.

The last one, could it be this:

It guarantees enrollees their choice of primary care provider: Consumers have their choice of provider within the plan’s network of doctors, including OB-GYNs and pediatricians, without a referral, as well as out-of-network emergency care.

I doubt very seriously if having her choice of primary care providers is killing her or hurting her in any way. If she doesn’t want to choose a doctor and would be more comfortable letting her insurance company choose, I am more than sure they would have no problem steering her to her cities equivalent of the Simpson’s Doctor Nick in Springfield.

These are the only things that are going on right now, and nothing that I have seen in the bill coming up would kill her either. So what the hell is she or is Perry talking about. What are any of these idiots posing as Republican presidential candidates talking about when screaming they wish to end this bill.

Do they wish to ensure poor autistic children and their families have their healthcare cancelled the minute they get the diagnosis, as that is one of the things that this bill stops. Or are they hell bent on ensuring that people who don’t have healthcare stay that way? What is it that these people DO want? They never tell the alternative, all they say is they want to stop socialized medicine. Why? Every one of the top nations in the world with the better life expectancies and beating us on the best places to live has socialized medicine. Is it killing them? Maybe we should start thinking about that.

Looking at these candidates and looking at my fellow American’s who are choosing from this gang of clowns, makes Finland, Canada, France, Germany, Sweden and Norway look really good right now. I think it is time to invest in Rosetta Stone and call it a day.

I have to argue a point with what I am sure is a well-meaning columnist who believes in the sanctity of family and thinks that more often than not children should be with their parents. I do as well…up to a point. What is this all about you wonder? Well, an article I read on CNN by Ruben Navarrette Jr. called “Taking Obese Child from Mom is Wrong.”

Is it really? Is it really wrong to say that to a mother whose child is morbidly obese, weighing more than 200 pounds at 8 years old? Well, according to Ruben it is, because he feels that the child protective agency (CPS) overstepped their bounds. They should have done some other form of intervention besides placing the kid in foster care.

But, Ruben and all who may be reading, there is a problem with what that line of thought. He admitted in his article that the state gave this “mom” a full year to get her ass in gear to start feeding her kid with some sense. They gave her the tools such as pediatric input on what and how to feed her child appropriately and instead of following the guidelines SHE MADE THE CHOICE to continue his 4,000 calorie a day junky, eat what you damn well please, garbage can lifestyle.

How the hell is this not abuse? It tells me that she didn’t care enough for the life of her child when the doctors and everyone else informed her of the life threatening issues that were imminent if she failed to help him. And she did just that, FAILED to help him by choosing to continue allowing him this garbage in system she created.

No one would have a problem if this mom were consistently feeding her kid a meager sustenance of 400 calories a day and doctors called CPS and alerted them that a kid was being starved and that health concerns were imminent. But CPS was called when in this case when the “mom” took her son to the emergency room with trouble breathing. That should have told the dingbat that he had some serious issues coming down the road. Wouldn’t Ruben and everyone else say that the mom was neglectful for not allowing her child to eat healthy?

So, why is it okay for this fool to abuse food just as the starvation mom abuses food, to harm her child? Whether you starve them or stuff them, you are doing something with food that has dire medical consequences for the child, all of which are bad with some being particularly life threatening. We are not talking about a case of a couple snack cakes here and there or a cookie before dinner. We are all guilty of that or something similar. Hell, we are talking about a lady who allowed her kid to eat 4,000 calories of food in a day.

Does anyone know what it takes to eat 4,000 calories a day? Most athletes don’t eat that much, save for the swimmer Michael Phelps. And look how he exercises. She was negligent just as much as the starvation mom. She needed her kid taken so that he may have a chance at health. And she still has a chance to get herself together enough to learn the proper way to feed children, herself and her family.

Let’s stop looking the other way on things like this. He would be up in arms if the story wasn’t about the boy being taken for obesity, but being the youngest kid to die of a heart attack due to obesity. No one would say, it was no one’s fault that an 8 year old died due to his cholesterol filled arteries. We all would be beside ourselves with disgust as we all should be now. And allowing anyone to blame it on ignorance is just plain ignorant. There comes a point in time when all of us know that eating ten big macs a week just isn’t a good thing. Consuming two boxes of cereal every morning is ridiculous.

So Ruben’s attempt at sympathy for a stupid mother isn’t going to fly in my book. Just as sympathy for a stupid mother who didn’t realize that reusing dirty diapers was a bio-hazard that would cause flaming diaper rash, or the stupid mother who didn’t think that playing video games instead of feeding her kids was a big problem, would be unthinkable. So should sympathy for this unfit, unhealthy, unthinkably dumb mother.

This is my ode to Halloween. I just want to clear up one misconception that bugs the hell out of me every year since the movie appeared on the scene. When people vote on the best zombie movie made, it is inevitable that some ding dong will always want to include 28 days later. 28 days later is NOT a zombie movie. A zombie is a person who has been killed and rises from the dead to consume the flesh of the living.

In 28 days later, the people were INFECTED with a virus that was pure rage. They weren’t trying to eat the living, they were trying to kill the living from the rage they were feeling. That is a big difference. These infected people were alive and could be killed in any number of ways that didn’t have to include destroying the brain. I love the horror film genre and zombies being my ultimate favorite. I love Max Brooks’ book the Zombie handbook, it is hilarious and a lot of it is true if zombies were running amok. I just had to vent this fact as I am a purest when it comes to zombies whether in movies, books or television.

Now I do like watching the show The Walking Dead. My only problem with the series thus far is that the people are extremely stupid. I have an ongoing dialogue with the Mr that you CAN do a zombie movie where the people do everything right and still have a crazy good show. Because no matter how much you do right, zombies are relentless. They will chase the human population to the end of time. Everyone doesn’t always have to be the idiot.

In the show everyone seems to be doing everything wrong most of the time. Think about the episode where the group was out searching for the little girl Sophia. Well the dingbat Andrea somehow gets so far from the group that when “Forest Walker” the zombie jumped her, she screams and the group actually had a good trek to get to her. And her actions when the zombie jumped her were classically stupid. She stabs him in the stomach. HE IS DEAD YOU IDIOT THAT WON’T WORK!!!

Anywho, they all seem to do some classically stupid things which are supposed to get us all worked up. I think that if they just scream and ran away looking for the others would be better than backing up over a tree limb. But, hey that’s here nor there. I do like the show and think that for a television drama; it has hit a spot that was being totally ignored. And I believe that it has created a larger zombie fan base than was previously there. Or maybe I just wasn’t aware of just how many zombie fans were lurking around out there.

I just want to give a shout out to all my zombie lovers out there on a great day for being one.

People such as Rose Marie Belforti pictured above, the town clerk in Ledyard NY decided that she just can’t give out marriage licenses to gay couples due to her religion so she did just that, told a lesbian couple they will need to come back and get that license when one of her subordinates could do it for them.

Now, unfortunately I don’t believe that she was hired to a job in government due to her religion or based on her religion. Her religion is her religion and that is something for her to keep to herself at her home. She actually has no right to bring her philosophical beliefs to the workplace and infringe on others rights. Belforti says state law “protects my right to hold both my job and my beliefs.”

Where state law DOES protect her right to hold her beliefs, it DOESN’T protect her from failing to do her job. That right there should have this fool kicking up dust all the way to the unemployment office where someone there should deny her service because their god says only pretty people need be served. And you know what I’m talkin’ bout’, just look at her. And my god says it is my right to call it like I see it!

The bible says in Genesis 3:16 – “I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. So me being a nurse, would she be in support of me denying her or her daughter’s call for pain medication during the delivery of a child. Should I say that in good Christian faith, I can’t get her any pain medication nor call an anesthesiologist due to my Christian beliefs which says that women should be in extreme pain during childbirth? And that her or her daughter will have to wait eight hours or more until my shift ends before they can have their pain alleviated due to my beliefs, is that acceptable to her.

People are so hypocritical. It is becoming much more prevalent these days. I want to deny people rights they have under the law based on my fucked up views of religion etc. All the while expecting others to respect their rights not only to do everything they want to do that complies with the law. She would never understand a teacher at her daughter’s school saying that he can’t teach her because his religious views say that women shouldn’t be allowed to be educated. And that her daughter will need to wait until she can get into another teacher’s class who will tolerate females being educated. She would expect this male teacher be fired, or disciplined in some way.

This woman should be fired. It is not her place to bring her religion to work. It is not her right to force her beliefs on anyone else. It IS her job to hand out marriage licenses not to administer religious teaching. And it is high time that we put a stop to these people who feel that their rights trump everyone else’s rights. There is nothing written in the constitution placing anyone person’s rights above another. Well except when we are dealing with black folks, but that’s another story isn’t it.

Where does it stop? Do we have to be subject to others views of the bible which can be pretty damaging? When does the stoning start? Do I get to tell my boss that even though I am required to work on the Sabbath, I won’t and I should not only keep my job but be paid because they can’t infringe upon my religious rights? And then should I be able to stone people to death for working on the Sabbath? Because we all know that in Numbers 15:32-56 it does say that Moses was told by god to stone a man to death for gathering sticks on the Sabbath. Hey, it’s my right under the bible and the state can’t stand in the way of my religious rights!

We have to set precedence or there is no stopping the things that one can do under the guise of bible worship. I can stone my son to death for being insolent as it gives me full right to do in Deuteronomy 21:18-21. This crap is going way too far and it is infringing on the rights of other humans to live their lives as the constitution said We hold these truths to be self–evident, That all men are created equal, That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, That among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.– That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, Deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

It clearly says that the government and I would assume the workers there in, derive their powers from the consent of the governed NOT from the bible, god nor Christian churches or any other churches. So it is about time to knock some sense into these people. Kick her butt out of that position and place someone there that understands that the power they possess are given by the people who consist of gays, blacks, Asians, whites, Muslims, Hispanics and every other race, religion or creed. Come on people get over your petty discrimination already! And that means you Rose Marie Belforti!

After reading one of my comments I of course felt a post coming on. This person I am about to respond to is just like all the others that made the very reason why I went on hiatus. Too much stupidity in one place is a dangerous thing. So, let’s just jump right in and get this party started, shall we?

My new friend Stephen Conklin asks: “First of all, what do black people not have in this country that white people do? You are showing your racism right there.”

Really, I am showing my racism by pointing out that there is disparity between races? This is a real question? Well I guess some people really are clueless. OK Stephen I’ll bite. How about we just list it out with reference so that you will be happy to have it backed up. But then you can’t really complain.

Wealth – The median wealth of white households is 20 times that of black households according to a Pew Research Center analysis of newly available government data from 2009. (Boy, what is it now after this recession? Do you think it grew or shrank?)

I guess you really can’t argue with that one unless you are going to tell me that black people just don’t want wealth, so they go about trying to ensure they have none. Or there is a real system of inequality in this country. Hmmm?

Jobs – Blacks are unemployed right now at a rate of twice that of whites. Black unemployment surged to 16.7% in August, its highest level since 1984, while the unemployment rate for whites fell slightly to 8%, the Labor Department reported. Black unemployment has been roughly double that of whites since the government started tracking the figures in 1972

And I guess you are going to say that black people just don’t want to work. But somehow they want to complain about unemployment for blacks. Hmm, doesn’t make sense, because if we didn’t want to work, we would all be happy about the numbers of unemployed blacks versus whites and then ask why more aren’t unemployed. Or can we look at the study by Devah Pager which showed that black men with NO criminal record and a 4 year college degree got far less job offers than white men with a felony record. Stephen, how do we explain this? Is it *GASP* disparity? Is it something that white men have – the fallacy that they are somehow better than black men, even when they have a criminal record? OH MY, what exactly could this study be showing us? Who knows right?

But people such as you will deny that this has anything to do with racism, it is just a side effect of something else. Why don’t you enlighten us as to why black unemployment is always double white unemployment? Because if blacks have everything whites have and every opportunity whites have then we should have similar unemployment rates. So what is the problem here? Lazy blacks, illegal immigrants taking black jobs or maybe it is just another example of how blacks are the last hired and the first fired as most blacks in the workforce already know.

Home ownership – Home ownership rates for African Americans is 48% (compared to 75% for Whites) according to newly released U.S. Census data from 2009. (Boy, I wonder what those rates are since this recession. Stephen, they sure as hell didn’t get better after 2009, you think?)

Now why is this? It can’t be that blacks just decided, “Hey, we don’t want houses or a way to build wealth for our families.” In fact we don’t want houses or jobs. That’s it right Stephen? Or maybe the redlining, racist lending practices and last hired, first fired is making a showing in the housing market as well. But of course this doesn’t mean that white people have something black people don’t have. This just means that blacks don’t have stuff white people DO have. LOL.

Education – According to The Maynard Institute more than 25 years after Brown v. Board of Education integrated the public schools, schools remain segregated. Studies establish that segregation perpetuates racial inequality. Teachers assigned to minority schools are more likely to be inexperienced or teaching outside their fields of expertise. Schools serving minority communities receive less financing and fewer schools are constructed in minority communities. Black and brown children are disciplined more harshly and frequently for the same offenses as white children.

But of course this is because black children don’t want to learn right? Everything showing disparity between the races proving that whites DO have things blacks don’t, can always be summed up as just a byproduct of blacks lack of desire for these things. Not that the American system is inherently set up to create these disparities. You see Stephen after slavery was abolished, Jim Crow reared its ugly head, then after Jim Crow we now have a supposed underground system even if highly blatant disparity that people like you pretend not to see. Even though it is glaring in your face like the pretty lights blinking on any of the casinos littering the strip in Las Vegas.

But, please don’t let me open your eyes. Just continue to sleep and pretend that its all equal and all black people have to do is pull themselves up by these non existent boot straps and just have what whites have. Because we black people never contemplated doing that at all. In fact we just never thought of just having these things. Hey, I am going to go and tell all the blacks, “Just have exactly what whites have!” Now, we can just do it. Thanks Stephen, you really showed me and the rest of black America that it was in our hands the whole time and all we had to do was do it. That college degree holding black man can now say, I’ll get that job no matter what felony wielding white man comes in for the position too. I will just TAKE that job. Thanks, Stephen you opened up all of our eyes!

But back to the REAL world, WHY is it that I have to consistently implore you to do a little research before coming to my blog and talking crap? Second time you haven’t listened and again the second time you look like an idiot. And yes, I called you a name. It is how we label someone when they are behaving in a manner that calls for their behavior to be explained to many people.

If you feel that my calling you what you come here and showing me you must be, then by all means don’t come here. I didn’t come to you and call you a name, you came here and acted in a fashion that warranted a name. If it talks like a moron, writes like a moron and thinks like a moron, then the chances are overwhelming that it IS a moron. Sorry.

Good luck next time. But, again, do some research before bringing your tripe. I don’t like stupidity for the sake of stupidity. Oh, and I will answer the rest of your tripe in due time.

Waaahhh, I only have 400 thousand dollars left over after feeding my family! Is what Tea Party congressman John Fleming’s cried on Jansing & Co. this morning about Obama’s plan to tax the wealthy as much as the middle class. Can this idiot be for real?

We have people and a lot of them in this country as well as in the Tea Party who have to “get along” with more like 40 thousand dollars or less a year and he is crying over 400 thousand. That just pisses me off to the core. This is the selfish bullshit that we are dealing with in some of the worst economic times ever.

Not only is this Tea Party sucker bitching and moaning about paying more taxes, but he and his cohorts are also saying that we need to cut spending on programs for the poor as well as “raise” taxes on those same poor folks. Because lord knows those poor suckers who after feeding their families are left with a good 200 dollars for the year as income should be forking out at least a hundred and fifty of that to pay down the deficit consisting mainly of tax cuts for John Fleming and those like his selfish ass.

Poor John Fleming sitting there in his million dollars or better home with his family just trying to survive and here we are trying to create class warfare with his kind by taking more of those 400 thousand dollar crumbs of his is after his businesses brought in 6.3 million dollars for the year. I guess when he said 400 thousand; he totally forgot the 173 thousand a year he also gets by being a congressman. But, why split hairs, we know he is just on the cusp of the poor house; and with that kind of money coming in every year, who can remember it all.

The class warfare is that the Republican and Tea Party believes that not only do the rich need to pay less into the society that is putting the money in their pockets, but somehow the poor should be paying more to ensure that they have the means to pay less. How sick is that? This has been a long time coming and people better start looking at the writing on the wall before it’s too late.

Even Jansing told the idiot that he position to the majority of America isn’t very sympathetic. He could care less because his answer was the “class warfare never created one job.” But, you know what Mr. Fleming, a tax cut for a selfish wealthy bastard never created one job either. In fact the years that we had all these tax cuts for the rich, the only thing that happened was that we started losing jobs faster than ever.

Because what Fleming doesn’t understand is that he has the whole economic structure backwards. He believes that those at the top or company owners create jobs when in fact it is those at the bottom who create jobs. It probably sounds nuts but hear me out. If I open a lemonade stand, I have to have a demand for my lemonade from the thirsty people looking for a good deal on a cold drink on a hot day.

Neither Mr. Fleming nor his cohorts are cruising the streets looking for lemonade as these people only make up one percent of the population anyway. It is the hard working people that are my customers. And any kid with a paper route, lemonade stand or girl scout selling cookies understands that you aren’t going to do any business if you have no customers or your customers have no money to spend.

Mr. Flemings owns a lot of Subway sandwich shops and he isn’t going to tell me that somehow if he has lower taxes and the poor have higher taxes he is going to do some brisk business. In fact we all know that he will do very poorly. If the people have no money or less money frivolous spending at sub shops will decline. Those moneyless people will be better off buying a loaf of bread and a package of baloney at the super market for the price of one sub sandwich. So, who is fooling who here?

But, you see it doesn’t just stop there. He and his cohorts want to cut all government programs so that those poor folks won’t even get food stamps to buy their bread and baloney. But, unfortunately for Mr. Fleming, they won’t have money for food, but they damn sure won’t have money for his stupid submarine sandwich.

I guess we’ll see his stupid face in the soup kitchen line right along with the rest of us. You can’t build a business with moneyless customers. And if your customers have no money, you my friend will eventually have no money either.