Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.

Paranoid delusion. We have guns too. It's NOT our goal. Now would you rather listen to Wayne La Pierre or me tell you what I think? He has an agenda to sell more firearms and doesn't know me. I have no agenda or ultimate goal and know me pretty well.

If you all would just stop with the over the top hyperbole about how you know what I think even when I tell you I don't think that, we might actually have a discussion. 170 million of your fellow Americans (+-) have an issue with the level of firearms that are available in this country because people are getting killed at WalMart. It's a reasonable concern. They matter too no matter how badly you hate them and make up stories about what they believe. Work with them or they will see you as an uncompromising, recalcitrant, head in sand, ideologue whose opinion can be discounted. And then you won't have any say in the compromises that are to come. Cause they're coming.

Paranoid delusion. We have guns too. It's NOT our goal. Now would you rather listen to Wayne La Pierre or me tell you what I think? He has an agenda to sell more firearms and doesn't know me. I have no agenda or ultimate goal and know me pretty well.

If you all would just stop with the over the top hyperbole about how you know what I think even when I tell you I don't think that, we might actually have a discussion. 170 million of your fellow Americans (+-) have an issue with the level of firearms that are available in this country because people are getting killed at WalMart. It's a reasonable concern. They matter too no matter how badly you hate them and make up stories about what they believe. Work with them or they will see you as an uncompromising, recalcitrant, head in sand, ideologue whose opinion can be discounted. And then you won't have any say in the compromises that are to come. Cause they're coming.

Pelosi, Clinton, Feinstein and several other prominent Democrats have said publicly that they would like to ban ALL guns. The link has been posted numerous times. CD won't let me post it again.

Pelosi, Clinton, Feinstein and several other prominent Democrats have said publicly that they would like to ban ALL guns. The link has been posted numerous times. CD won't let me post it again.

Pandering to their base. Just like Trump said we would have cheaper healthcare for everybody and Mexico would pay for a wall. Too many people don't want it, including other branches of government. Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows this. La Pierre and the manufacturers love the gullible. Are you a noobie to politics or what?

170 million of your fellow Americans (+-) have an issue with the level of firearms that are available in this country because people are getting killed at WalMart. ...

No, 170 million of our fellow Americans have an issue with the level of firearms that are available in this country because they have been continuously lied to and terrorized into hysteria. Terrorized with the mistaken idea that the number of guns has anything to do with the number of times people are getting killed in Walmart, Dayton, Georgia, Gilroy, and other such mass shooting sites. Something that happens less often than people getting struck by lightning.

The other 175 million know better than to listen to the hysteria spreaders and liars who keep proposing various gun-grabbing schemes which have a 100% record of failure.

Pelosi, Clinton, Feinstein and several other prominent Democrats have said publicly that they would like to ban ALL guns. The link has been posted numerous times. CD won't let me post it again.

What they would like to do and what is actually possible are, in the case of those few, polar opposites.

No one would believe banning with a view to possible confiscation as being even remotely possible. Going back to the prohibition era as a "Coles notes" exercise in research as to how the banning would work out in reality would show it being a fools errand.

Actual attempts to put any confiscation legislation into place would result in anarchy.

They all now this. They are simply talking heads maintaining the political practice of keeping their faces in the news.

Does anyone actually think that anything to come out of Washington by way of addressing firearm carnage would be possible to enact without co-operation from the firearm owners, freedom advocates, constitutional scholars or the firearm lobby?

Nothing will be done of any note that does not include discussions spanning months if not years taking place with all parties having those dogs in the hunt sitting at the table. To attempt otherwise, even those most arrogant of pols know would be futile and end very badly if done with disregard for common sense.

Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.