[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489540
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-834:
----------------------------------------
Would it be so bad if memory consumption was proportional to posting list size? True, special
consideration might be necessary for large documents if payloads were large, and if you have
any Query subclasses that rewrite themselves to a zillion subqueries, each of which maintains
its own TermPositions subclass instance, that could pose difficulties. What are some other
problematic scenarios?
> Payload Queries
> ---------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-834
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assigned To: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: boosting.term.query.patch
>
>
> Now that payloads have been implemented, it will be good to make them searchable via
one or more Query mechanisms. See http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/Payload_Planning for
some background information and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755 for the issue
that started it all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org