WeAreChange Confronts Dick Cheney On 9/11 Standdown Order

“Thank you Mr. Cheney for all you’ve done”

The testimony of Norman Mineta before the 9/11 Commission leaves compelling questions about former Vice President Dick Cheney’s actions on the day of 9/11. Then Transportation Secretary Mineta witnessed Cheney refuse to contradict an apparent standdown order as an aide warned of something incoming at the Pentagon. Cheney has given conflicting reports about what time he entered the PEOC bunker. Mineta later confirmed his suppressed 9/11 Commission testimony and refuted Cheney’s account of arriving later.

During the CPAC conference, WeAreChange.org confronted Cheney about these questions, which he refused to address.

“Hey Mr. Cheney, what did you do in the underground bunker on 9/11? Dick Cheney we know what you did on 9/11 with the standdown order. Norman Mineta testified against you on the 9/11 Commission report. What happened on 9/11?”

When he was being forced out, WeAreChange.org founder Luke Rudkowski calmly asked security not to push him; security backed off after asking him, ‘Are you being polite?’

Luke Rudkowski and James Lane of We Are Change confront Dick Cheney in Wahsington D.C. at CPAC 2/10/2011.

Cheney dodged the continuing questions by exiting with his entourage into an elevator. As a woman started repeating “Thank you Mr. Cheney for all you’ve done,” Rudkowski interjected that he was a ‘terrorist.’ Certainly, the use of admittedly elevated terror alerts throughout the Bush administration to stoke the fear card and score political dominion alone is reason to justify this label. The implications of what really happened on 9/11, and in relation to Cheney’s apparent standdown order, is even more compelling. Notably, a change in the standard operating procedure for the chain of command during the event of a hijacked aircraft was changed in June 2001, including subjecting NORAD’s response to DoD approval (SEE BELOW).

(Click each document for a larger image)

The former Vice President’s re-entry into the public limelight, after years of dealing with heart issues, is what appears to be an attempt to re-brand the Bush Administration in time to retain neo-con power in the coming GOP presidential primary field, where tea party politics and candidates like Ron Paul have obviously taken root with conservative voters in the years of the Obama administration. This confrontation occurred during the same CPAC convention where Ron Paul won the presidential straw poll and Dick Cheney was heckled and called a “war-monger” during a pep rally where Donald Rumsfeld was given the “Defender of the Constitution Award.”

“During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President…the plane is 50 miles out…the plane is 30 miles out….and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president “do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said “Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!?

“During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who[…] the plane is 50 miles out…the plane is 30 miles out….and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out,”

I know you and Steve have done tons more research into all of this than I have, and have not come to your beliefs lightly, and I’m not contradicting that. But I am confused. The Pentagon one – I did try to look up some stuff on that one, and I kept coming across stuff that was saying there was no plane at the Pentagon, it was a bomb. I thought I saw pics of a plane crashed into the Pentagon that day, but in all that was going on, perhaps I only assume I saw that – I am willing to concede that. But now there’s this guy saying he kept reporting, or hearing a man reporting, that the plane was approaching the Pentagon. So, if there was no plane in the Pentagon and it was a bomb that knocked part of it down, why was this guy reporting that the plane was approaching? If there was no plane, why would anyone be upset that Cheney didn’t rescind a stand-down order for a plane that didn’t exist?

DF,
I believe it was possibly a missile that struck the Pentagon. Eyewitnesses said they saw a commuter plane in the area at that time. The damage done appears to be along the lines of a missile. What else could cut through to the inner rings of the Pentagon so cleanly?

Don’t know if you’ve seen this video. It does a good job of showing the interior damage & it highlights some serious flaws in the official story. Pentagon Strike

The first eyewitness report on record was from a Mexican grounds-
keeping crew that were all standing right there and watched the whole
thing transpire. They had front-row, ringside seats.

They all agreed to the last man that it was a commuter jet, like a Gulfstream or a Lear. They were the first ones on the news, because
they were all standing out in the yard when it happened. Plenty of
other people came forward later to corroborate their story. But then
that whole thing just kind of “went away”, as usual, and shills like
Tim Timmerman (doesn’t exist) who discounted the initial eyewitness reports quickly became the focus of all media coverage.

What’s the difference between a modified “business” jet and a cruise missile?

These last articles on 9/11 are great. Very
timely and informative. Thank you!

I’m thinking I may have mentioned this to
you before — and you might have already
seen it before, regardless — but if you
haven’t seen “Was extra equipment attach-
ed to flight 175?” it is an authentic “must”.
It may well be the best 9/11 mini-documen-
tary I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen plenty.
I have it on my home page 9/11 article, or
you can just hit YouTube and google it.
That is the exact title…

The control of information is something the elite always does, particularly in a despotic form of government. Information, knowledge, is power. If you can control information, you can control people.

Tom Clancy

If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.

George Washington

POLICE STATE USA

You learn that you either are going to have a police state where you don't have any freedom left, or you're going to build a world that doesn't create terrorists, and that means a whole different way of getting along.