The president is protecting our freedom of religion, not interferring with it. The employer has no right to interfere in what goes on in your bedroom than the government does. Just because you work for a catholic organization does not mean you agree with all its teachings. My hat goes off to the president for protecting the individuals rights, not the employers

We have yet to hear an intelligent discussion on the purposes and benefits of the original electoral college system as designed by the Framers in the Constitution. Do we really want the best president money can buy or a president that cannot be bought at any price? For an in-depth analysis see: "The Evolution and Destruction of the Original Electoral College".

The U.S. government has spent nearly $1.8 million defending prosecutors from allegations that they broke the law in the botched corruption case against former Alaska senator Ted Stevens, Justice Department records show.

The case against Stevens fell apart three years ago when the Justice Department admitted its attorneys had improperly concealed evidence that could have helped his defense. A court-ordered investigation concluded in November that prosecutors had engaged in "significant, widespread, and at times intentional misconduct," but that they should not face criminal contempt of court charges.

The State of Lousiana has passed a law that effectively prohibits buying, selling, or trading by any of its citizens more than once a month unless the transaction is recorded and a check, money order, or electronic payment is used as tender for the debt. This blatantly infringes on people's privacy rights, in addition to violating the legal tender provisions of Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibit the states from making anything other than gold or silver coin legal tender.

Dear Judge: Considering, as I believe and having read it several tomes before, that every newly seated President's first agenda is to sign, as Abe did, a National "Declaration of Emergency", thereby 'temporarily' suspending the Constitution (but which?, there are two?), thus being able to function in the nature of a "dictator" without congressional approval, that every one is wondering about, why it never gets invoked anymore. This factual setting supports then all the judicial failures against B. Obama's with respect to his background flaws, because, as a judge you know, the courts cannot entertain any such litigation in the absence of an ineffective suspended Constitution.
Please, your comment!

Dear Judge: Considering, as I believe and having read it several tomes before, that every newly seated President's first agenda is to sign, as Abe did, a National "Declaration of Emergency", thereby 'temporarily' suspending the Constitution (but which?, there are two?), thus being able to function in the nature of a "dictator" without congressional approval, that every one is wondering about, why it never gets invoked anymore. This factual setting supports then all the judicial failures against B. Obama's with respect to his background flaws, because, as a judge you know, the courts cannot entertain any such litigation in the…

I've been in the field of radiology for more than 2 decades..one of the core principles of radiation safety is that " There is no known safe level of exposure to radiation"...is the equipment being tested routinely by a radiation physicist? ...the TSA personnel should be wearing radiation film badges(dosimetry) to record there daily exposure...radiation is cumulative...what is the dose a person receives during a TSA scan?...thanks for your time, gerard

Please start connecting the many dark/foreboding dots: too much evidence everywhere of the descending totalitarian police state. army getting rid of surplus weapons , giving them to city goon squads, downsizing armed forces, not going to dump these people onto the unemployment rolls , they will therefore find employment in the national police force, new NDAA law feeds into this nefarious picture perfectly. We've been set-up Judge and you're most aware of the colossal danger. Most people subscribe to a consensus of indifference! You've got the only national platform around!

I hope you will help get the word out about this candidate if you agree he's worthy of your support. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz He has an impressive bio.
WE NEED RON PUL TO BRING UP THIS SUBJECT AT THE NEXT FEW DEBATES.

Fox calls themselves fair and balanced when they shun Ron Paul. I thunk they are as bad as the MAINSTREET media if not worse. The other medias are a democrate media while Fox is a republican media as long as it is who they want, to me this is not even close to fair and balanced. I will only tune into Fox for your show. Keep up the good work and thank you for standing up for FREEDOM and LIBERTY.

The premise of both books is that national sovereignty is an outdated concept. The books call for the complete repeal of the US constitution. It envisions a world wide technocracy run by multi-national corporations and NGOs.