Professors to students – Drop class if you dispute man-made climate change

31 Aug 2016 – In an email describing their course “Medical Humanities in the Digital Age” at the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs, professors advised their students that man-made climate change is not open for debate, and that those who think otherwise have no place in their course.

“The point of departure for this course is based on the scientific premise that human induced climate change is valid and occurring,” the email states.

Colorado is Satan’s Winter Get-a-Way, and contains some of the most evil of Mankind so “never” expect anything truthful out of Colorado, they love the lie/lies, they embrace them and for anyone who seeks an education in Colorado, they’re NUTS !

As much as I hate the climate Nazis, I can kind of agree with the prof in this case. A prof has the right to set the terms of his course. If you don’t like his/her terms, then don’t sign up.

Too many students think they are on equal terms with the prof. Contesting a prof’s opinion might make sense if you have the trained mind of a grad student. But underclassmen need to realize their academic thinking is still little more than untrained, uninformed opinion.

I don’t agree. This professor is basically saying that AGW is true, and they do not want anyone on their course that disagrees with that belief. So they are actually telling their students how they should think. Students should have the right to debate with their tutors. And it’s up to the tutor to prove them wrong. In this case it’s the tutor who has the ‘untrained, uninformed opinion’, Gene, and they’re trying to force that uninformed opinion on future students! It’s a disgrace.

If that were to be so Gene we would have never left the “Dark Ages”.
Through correspondence and open dialog more than once I argued a good case and won against my instructor while in first and second term college. Even won an arguments resulting in the rewording of a couple of equations. The arguments presented gave all respect in the forwards and closing arguments to the instructors asking for consideration of my proposals.
On a point that may make the professor look foolish in front of the class it would be more appropriate to construct a written correspondence so as not to publicly humiliate one. Especially yourself lol.

Quote:
31 Aug 2016 – In an email describing their course “Medical Humanities in the Digital Age” at the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs, professors advised their students that man-made climate change is not open for debate, and that those who think otherwise have no place in their course.
Comment:
When Human Induced Climate change is finally exposed for the junk it is. The entire faculty in charge of this course “Medical Humanities in the Digital Age” tenured or otherwise need to be fired without compensation or notice.
If necessary the entire faculty staff from the Dean downwards need to go for teaching fairy tales as truth.

University of Colorado?
I see! Looks as though the professor has been smoking too much “Mary-Wana”.
Obviously, our education system forgot to teach students to think for themselves rather than gather a flock behind some religious fairytale.

Free Speech and Free Thought are heartily encouraged by the Progressive Left,………………just as long as that speaker, or thinker, agrees with the Progressive “Global Warming” ideology. Otherwise, a dissenter is totally out of bounds and must be excluded. Arguing the merits of the premises is not open to debate. So much for Freedom of Thought.

The paradox of unanimity
The closer one gets to a 100%
consensus, the more likely the data producing the consensus is wrong.
Especially when dealing with a system or situation where disagreement is
expected.

The degree to which you should trust consensus is in direct proportion
to the level of uncertainty involved, which in itself is directly
related to the complexity of the system or question.

As someone who has progressed through several institutions I assure you it is about the uneducated “initiate” proving they can comprehend the “gospel” and demonstrating they can solve problems using the “ordained’ methods.

As the global warming paradigm falls apart, we will see hard core supporters like these “progressive” college professors clinging desperately to their beliefs and becoming more and more intransigent, insistent and irrational about AGW. This kind of nonsense is just symptomatic of the fact that public support of AGW will soon disappear.