5.4.2013 22:31, Butch Malahide write:> On Apr 5, 1:24 pm, Kaba <k...@nowhere.com> wrote:>> 5.4.2013 21:05, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote:>>> is "spinor" derived from pinor?>>>> Yes. According to the paper "Clifford Modules" this is a joke due to>> Jean-Pierre Serre. Pinors are to O(V) as spinors are to SO(V). The term>> stuck to use.>> By "yes" did you mean "no"?

I meant no:)

> Aren't you saying that "pinor" is derived> from "spinor" (which is derived from "spin")?