The statement that says there is no death by natural causes and the two Ascertained Facts listed in Message 81 are not claims but simply deductive reasoning and clues based on the message that comes from the first instruction of Genesis as originally written.

The statement that says there is no death by natural causes and the two Ascertained Facts listed in Message 81 are not claims but simply deductive reasoning and clues based on the message that comes from the first instruction of Genesis as originally written.

Ok, so you don't necessarily think those things are true? Because if that is the case, you totally didn't make that clear at all.

If you do think they are true, then its on the order of claiming that "Hobbits exist and like to eat," is simply a logical deduction from reading the first chapter of "The Hobbit".

CrazyDiamond7 writes:

When a person does not know about the proposed new experiment then (s)he has the option of seeing the clues from the contents of Message 81 and the two ascertained facts which stand still intact up to this day; these facts had not been proven wrong by the evolutionist belief in death by natural causes.

I have always had trouble parsing your posts, but it seems you have several things wrong here.

For one, "death by natural causes" isn't an "evolutionist belief". It is simply an observation by all of sane humanity that people die both from injury and ailment, and simply from age or malfunction.

Second, most people don't think that Genesis actually says what you interpret it to say. The story doesn't say that the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was poisonous, it says that it was *forbidden*. Adam and Eve dying after eating from the tree was a punishment, which was conveyed to their offspring no matter their behavior. Their children even if allowed to stay within the garden and obeying all God's commands (including avoiding the tree) would still have died based on this concept of "Original Sin".

Finally, so what if people have the option of making this wild interpretation and imagining an experiment that hasn't ever been performed? Even if its proposal of an immortality diet hasn't been disproved by anyone (mainly because nobody knows that the diet would possibly be, and the conditions of a positive test would take an infinite period of time) that doesn't lend it any credence.

CrazyDiamond7 writes:

When a person drinks the right wine then the digestive system will produce a lower level of acidity during the digestion of regular food which contributes to longevity.

THERE! Thats a claim. Cite your sources, provide your data, and provide your testing criteria. If you had any of that you would probably be able to say what the "right wine" actually is, rather than just making crap up.

CrazyDiamond7 writes:

And when one eats solely fish rather than red meat then that person tends to live longer since the comsumption of red meat does require the production of a gastric juice with a higher level of acidity and therefore more nutrient compounds that are properly Human being released and decomposed.

Same as above, but also define what you mean by "properly Human". You seem to think that people can be depleted of "human essence" or something.

hehe in slovenija we have a song that is sung on many occasions moslty birthdays the title is Kolker kaplic tolko let (as may drops as many years), our national anthem has a verse prijatli obrodile so trte vince nam sladko ki nam oivlja ile srce razjasni in oko ( friends the vines gave us sweet wine, that revitalise arteries, clears the hart and eyes) so you can assume we drink a lot of wine still we have a life expetancy of 69.1 for men and 78,2 for women (why there is such a big diference is debatable most probably because women never worked in mines, factories that had to do whit azbestus..... on a large scale if it is true than the life expectansy should increase when we get to the generations that did not worke in helth hazzerdus enviorments)

conclusion we drink wine and we still die at normal ages and by the way the french do to although the french women do have a life expectansy of 84 the men are still screwed

still there are people who we call fructarians they eat only fruit and they still die, sometimes sooner do to lack of some vitamins or elements that our body needs. There are also people who eat tones of fruit my father was one of them and they also eat other stuff and he still had age related problems (he died in a car accident though). Im not saying eating fruits is not healthy im saying eating only fruits is not healthy and eating tones of fruits whit other foods will not stop aging or we would know a few people who are over 200 years old . Im aslo not saying drinking a bit of wine a day is not healthy most studies show that it is, as long as you dont over do it though it still does not stop aging. I also know a woman who is 93 years old and never had health problems she drinks 0.2 of nops (moonshine) every morning, do i think nops is the only cause i doubt it i also think her dna, style of life, nutritional habits, had loads to do whit it do i think she will be immortal NO.

Hello,everyone!I'm new here.For World of Warcraft players can not only enjoy some fun from the game, more of which can realize some truth.Hundreds of players realize the philosophy of life in this wonderful game.Do you agree with me?