In science, anecdotal evidence has been defined as: "information that is not based on facts or careful study"[4][verification needed]
"non-scientific observations or studies, which do not provide proof but may assist research efforts"[5] "reports or observations of usually
unscientific observers"[6] "casual observations or indications rather than rigorous or scientific analysis"[7] "information passed along
by word-of-mouth but not documented scientifically" Anecdotal evidence can have varying degrees of formality. For instance, in medicine, published
anecdotal evidence is called a case report, which is a more formalized type of evidence subjected to peer review.[8] Although such evidence is not
seen as conclusive, it is sometimes regarded as an invitation to more rigorous scientific study of the phenomenon in question.[9] For instance, one
study found that 35 of 47 anecdotal reports of side effects were later sustained as "clearly correct."[10] Anecdotal evidence is considered the
least certain type of scientific information.[11] Researchers may use anecdotal evidence for suggesting new hypotheses, but never as validating
evidence.

Did you get that?? Can you comprehend that?

"study found that 35 of 47 anecdotal reports of side effects were later sustained as "clearly correct."

Sure - side effects of medicines......nothing at all to do with "cjemtrails".

Let's have a look at he anecdotal evidence for "chemtrails" and how accurate it has been founf to be shall we, since "c hemtrails" are the matter
under discussion, and not medicines!!

KSLA "Barium" trails - false (mis-read micro for milli)
Mt Shasta aluminium in water - false (tested sludge, not water)
Mohave barium levels - false - measured levels were well within the norm
Photos, videos & written accounts of "chemtrails" - not one ever actually found correct
"Connect the dot" hysteria to monsanto aluminium resistent gene in plants - never actually established any link betwen monsanto & any "spraying",
& ignores almost 100 years of known published history of the study fo aluminium toxicity in acidic soils
"Accounts" & stories of "chemtrails" being used to "help" conceal the sun, change the weather, hide niburu & miscellaneous other theories - none
ever actually shown as anythign except someone's unsupported imagination

I would say me and the "believers" are on to something.....

well of course you would - else you'd have to admit you've been sucked in and fallen for one of the most stupid hoaxes ever - I would say
this one will be right up there with Piltdown Man - and I havethe evidence to support my contention - you are still imagining fairies.

your logic, not mine, is what's failing you

"My" logic isn't failing anyone - it is also not "my" logic - logic os not "owned" by anyone.

It is, however, ignored by the likes of you who prefer to believe something that has no verifiable evidence supporting its existance. For some reason
you prefer to fear the fantasy ratehr than accept that it doesn't exist.

It may be as simple as this; has this Serbian gentleman brought something new to the table that adds to the understanding of 'ChemTrails?

I watched the whole video and I saw nothing of the sort. So it is going to end up being the same old run down.

Why is it more interesting because it comes from Serbia?

I know you are not asking me, but i have to reply.
It may be nothing, or it may...its simply something i think everybody on ats should be aware of, also i didnt seen this posted so i thought many
people will appreciate this information, thats why i posted it here and i dont see why it should be more interesting than anything

Maybe it will end up in nothing, so what? What you think you or anybody else arguing about chemtrails will change with this argue? Its just spam,
which is...well...almost in every single thread that has anything to do with chemtrails. Also:

P.S. None of these threads will ever stay on topic; we are way beyond that. Plus; stay on topic for what? So we can pick this Serbian guy's pitch
apart only to discover that it all comes from the same misunderstandings? No thanks.

Hmmm. I am not sure if I get the part where the troll reveals themselves and then you call them a troll but OK.

I hope you have read my posts and that you get their meaning. I really feel as though I have touched a nerve here and I am looking more forward than
ever to finishing up my final post for my own ChemTrail thread and getting it posted.

Have a good one and take care.

I dig your righteousness, FreeSpeaker.

Oh and what I meant to say is; sorry for causing you to perceive that we have derailed the thread. Better?

Originally posted by Frater210
Hmmm. I am not sure if I get the part where the troll reveals themselves and then you call them a troll but OK.

They don't normally and thats why you're post struck a nerve in me. Why bother staying on topic? Becuase only trolls, or disrespectful people, will
derail a thread and not give a damn about doing so. Guess how you're post came across?

Originally posted by Frater210
I hope you have read my posts and that you get their meaning. I really feel as though I have touched a nerve here and I am looking more forward than
ever to finishing up my final post for my own ChemTrail thread and getting it posted.

I did read you're posts and didn't have one problem with them untill the one we are discussing was posted.

Originally posted by Frater210
I dig your righteousness, FreeSpeaker.

Its not about righteousness, its about respect and manners. ATS used to, and I hope it still does, take both seriously.

Just want to say that I found the video riveting and would love to hear one like it from an American icon speaking out for not only our environment
but the environment of the planet. If you have any more information about the video and can share then please do - things like what law prompted it,
how is it being received, how was it disseminated etc.

Just want to say that I found the video riveting and would love to hear one like it from an American icon speaking out for not only our environment
but the environment of the planet. If you have any more information about the video and can share then please do - things like what law prompted it,
how is it being received, how was it disseminated etc.

I dont have more info than what is in the source, but i will try to keep an eye on any progress. Will post links when(if) i do.

There's no point in feeding immature trolls. Just ingore the posts and carry on.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.