Continuing to build on our heritage of innovation in document technology and services, today’s Xerox is now also the world’s leading enterprise for business process and document management. We offer business and IT outsourcing services, including data processing, healthcare solutions, HR benefits management, finance support, transportation solutions, as well as customer care services for commercial and government organizations worldwide. Our technology and expertise enables companies to simplify how work gets done and focus on what matters most: their real business.

Forbes BrandVoice™ allows marketers to
connect directly with the Forbes audience by enabling them to create
content – and participate in the conversation – on the Forbes digital publishing
platform. Each BrandVoice™ is produced
by the marketer.
More on BrandVoice™ here
, or email us directly at
brandvoice@forbes.com.

Out Of Gas: How Can We Save The Nation's Ailing Transportation Infrastructure?

Who pays to maintain the nation’s roads, bridges and tunnels? You do, through state and federal fuel taxes. But revenue from those taxes is declining because we’re driving less and our cars are more fuel efficient.

While the pursuit of efficient energy use is a good thing, the unintended consequence is costly. According to a study by the American Road and Transportation Builders Association, new fuel economy standards will result in the loss of more than $65 billion in the Highway Trust Fund dollars between 2017 and 2023.

High fuel prices on the whole also impact the total vehicle miles traveled, thereby reducing the amount of fuel utilized and the amount of fuel tax collected.

So, while transportation infrastructure needs are increasing – and in some cases exponentially as the nation’s infrastructure ages beyond useful life – there is less revenue being generated for the preservation and upkeep of our roadways, bridges and tunnels.

Where do we go from here?

Some believe a part of the answer exists in tolling – or, a variation of tolling that is based on total miles traveled. There are several names for it – “mileage tax,” “mileage-based user fees,” “vehicle miles traveled fee,” but the concept is simple: you pay based on the amount you drive.

Drivers, whether they are commuters, recreational travelers or freight movers, pay directly to use many of the facilities they travel on (e.g. bridges, tunnels and highways) through existing flat federal, state and local fuel taxes. But tying user fees directly to the miles driven by a vehicle matches a usage pricing model favored and presently utilized by many businesses. For example, each time you turn on a light, you pay for the electricity you use. And the more data your smartphone uses, the more the phone company charges. One of the biggest challenges to the usage model is not the technology to implement such a model but rather the politics involved and public perception. In fact, the technology to switch to a usage model already exists today. It’s in a variation of tolling. It’s in the transponders or a similar technology that we use every day with E-ZPass and other electronic tolling modes. I guess one could say that tolling is the original mileage-based user fee.

Mileage-based user fee models are currently in trial and development in several states and European nations. These trials are proving that existing devices and systems can efficiently collect data on mileage use, communicate the data to processing centers, efficiently analyze and document the data, then collect fees from users.

To be clear, tolling is not the end-all solution to the nation’s transportation funding woes, but it is undoubtedly part of the solution. Someday we will hopefully even see mileage-based user fees that are implemented with variable rates that truly impact driver behavior and allow for smarter congestion management through pricing.

Since transportation funding solutions are not likely to fully emerge at the federal level, local and state entities need to consider and be able to implement all options to meet their needs. While mileage-based user fee scenarios are being considered and developed, tolling is today often one of the only presently available and viable additional funding sources whether funded directly by agencies or through public-private partnerships. And tolling clearly utilizes the user pays philosophy that is at the heart of the mileage-based user fee model. Agencies are already transforming their tolled facilities with traditional electronic and cash toll collection systems to all electronic collection. The Golden Gate Bridge and the Florida Turnpike are good examples.

Paying by the mile surely will have an impact on driver behavior in a way different from traditional fuel taxes. Some consumers, organizations and politicians worry the costs of implementing new technology and doing away with fuel tax legacy systems will be exorbitant. Others believe the “use as you cruise” model is the smart answer to disappearing fuel tax revenue. But what are our real options? What do you think?

Ken has more than 41 years of extensive, direct toll road and public facility management and consulting expertise. At Xerox, he provides transportation thought leadership and facilitates transportation revenue solutions with a primary focus on electronic tolling and intelligent transportation systems.

Post Your Comment

Post Your Reply

Forbes writers have the ability to call out member comments they find particularly interesting. Called-out comments are highlighted across the Forbes network. You'll be notified if your comment is called out.

Comments

In your article, you are making the assumption that we need more money to attend to our roads and highways. The thinking behind this assumption is part of the problem. The government spends approximately 3.8 trillion dollars every year, way too much by most standards. In each area of spend, we talk about raising taxes, new revenue models for government. The main issue of prioritization of government spending never gets talked about. Yes, we need good roads and transportation is one thing that truly affects everybody at some point.

What about programs that only affect relatively small groups of people? I favor reprioritizing government spend to focus only on those things that affect all of us. Subsidies, kick-backs, pay to play and government giveaways to specific groups needs to stop. Freeing up those trillions of dollars would be more dollars than we would ever need for transportation costs.

This is more drivel from Forbes. There are no facts in this article, just a bunch of statements from the author who conveniently sidesteps that fact that very little of the gas taxes presently go to road maintenance. The author seems to have t/an agenda to convince the gullible public into thinking we need to pay more for infrastructure maintenance. How about we hold our political filth accountable for how the waste gas tax revenue.