The recent events in nodes to consider call for some action.
People have been considering nodes anonymously with crude reasons, or no reason at all.
I suggest adding the considerer to the reason automatically.I hope that people will quit unnecessary considering when they know, that everybody will see who it was.

Another problem isn't addressed by this measure:
If someone considers a node saying: "delete, dup", the node is deleted in extremely short time. The short time span suggests that nobody (including myself) checks if that really was a duplicate.
Perhaps we should be a bit more attentive.

To repeat myself and others one more time again (: we should also require a non-blank reason for consideration and should allow a node to be "reconsidered" so someone who notices that a "delete, duplicate" isn't really a duplicate can add a "keep, isn't duplicate" line. This last feature also prevents the "denial of service consideration" which I have used a couple of times (consider a node with a misleading reason and noone can consider it for the right reason).

A big ++ on identifying the considerer! (I picture a meeting in which
one monk stands and offers a motion, then the rest vote on it).

On the topic of duplicates, the considerer should always provide a link
to the suposed "original" node so that voters can check
for themselves. Often "duplicates" aren't exactly the same and
a bit of judgement is required to decide which one to keep (e.g. newbies
who ignore the preview then re-post to correct formatting). So
while we're giving poor idle vroom suggestions, maybe the
consider nodelet could have a button (& box?) for "alleged duplicate of node"?