Additional Links

New Zealand says no evidence NSA spied on reporter

Jul 29 2013 10:05 pm

In this Sept. 1, 2011 photo, author Nicky Hager attends a press conference in Wellington after the release of his book Other People's Wars. A report in the Sunday Star-Times newspaper said that the New Zealand military, assisted by U.S. spy agencies, collected phone metadata to monitor New Zealand's journalist Jon Stephenson. The story by journalist Hager said the military became unhappy at Stephenson's reporting on how it treated Afghan prisoners. New Zealand said Monday, July 29, 2013, there is no evidence that either the U.S. or the New Zealand military spied on journalist Stephenson in Afghanistan who was freelancing for American news organization McClatchy. (AP Photo/New Zealand Herald, Mark Mitchell) NEW ZEALAND OUT, AUSTRALIA OUT

New Zealand says no evidence NSA spied

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — New Zealand said Monday there is no evidence that either the U.S. or the New Zealand military spied on a journalist in Afghanistan who was freelancing for American news organization McClatchy.

But Prime Minister John Key said it’s theoretically possible that reporters could get caught in surveillance nets when the U.S. spies on enemy combatants.

The comments came in response to a report in the Sunday Star-Times newspaper that the New Zealand military, assisted by U.S. spy agencies, collected phone metadata to monitor journalist Jon Stephenson, a New Zealander. The story by journalist Nicky Hager said the military became unhappy at Stephenson’s reporting on how it treated Afghan prisoners.

“We have identified no information at this time that supports Mr. Hager’s claims,” Maj. Gen. Tim Keating, the acting defense force chief, said in a statement.

U.S. surveillance programs have become the focus of a global debate since former defense contract worker Edward Snowden leaked classified information about the National Security Agency in June. The U.S. said the NSA programs are necessary to avert terror attacks, while critics have called it unregulated spying.

Also Monday, New Zealand Defense Minister Jonathan Coleman acknowledged the existence of an embarrassing confidential order that lists investigative journalists alongside spies and terrorists as potential threats to New Zealand’s military. That document was leaked to Hager, who provided a copy to The Associated Press. Coleman said the order will be modified to remove references to journalists.

He also said the New Zealand Defense Force (NZDF) had conducted an extensive search of its records over the weekend and had found no evidence that either it or any other agency had spied on Stephenson.

“The collection of metadata on behalf of the NZDF by the U.S. would not be a legitimate practice, when practiced on a New Zealand citizen,” Coleman said. “It wouldn’t be something I would support as the minister, and I’d be very concerned if that had actually been the case.”

Metadata is the information associated with a phone call or an email, such as the location of the caller or sender, or the length of the call. It is analogous to the information available on the envelope of a letter sent by regular mail.

Keating, the defense chief, said the military officers responsible for operations in Afghanistan had assured him there had been no unlawful monitoring of Stephenson by New Zealand or foreign spy agencies.

Key, who is traveling in South Korea, told a reporter from The New Zealand Herald newspaper that “if you rang a member of the Taliban that the Americans were monitoring because they believed them to be a threat, then in theory that’s how you could show up.”

“I’m not saying that’s happened. I’m just saying that we don’t go and monitor journalists,” he added.

On Monday, Hager said he stood by the story.

“Direct denials are always unsettling, but I would not have published unless I had a really good source,” he said.

Hager, a freelance journalist who has written several books on New Zealand military intelligence, declined to elaborate on his sourcing. He said he’s faced unwarranted denials before.

The confidential order he obtained states under the heading “The Threat”: “Organizations with extreme ideologies may try to acquire classified information, not necessarily to give to a potential enemy, but because its use may bring the government into disrepute. There is also a threat from certain investigative journalists who may seek to acquire and exploit official information for similar reasons.”

The revelation has angered journalism advocates in New Zealand.

Coleman said the order, first issued a decade ago and reissued in 2005, was heavy-handed and inappropriate, and that he’d asked the defense force to rewrite it to remove the references to journalists.

The story on Stephenson came after the journalist sued the defense force for defamation. Stephenson had sought $405,000 in reparation after claiming the defense force had damaged his reputation by implying he fabricated an interview with a unit commander. During the trial this month, the defense force acknowledged the interview may have taken place. The trial ended with the jury unable to reach a verdict.

Stephenson, who is on vacation in Europe, could not be reached Monday.

The White House and the AP’s intelligence sources in Washington, D.C. did not respond on Sunday to requests for comment on the Sunday Star-Times story.

McClatchy said it had not yet spoken with its former freelancer, nor with the U.S. or New Zealand governments.

“We don’t have much information on this. We really have learned about it this morning from the Star-Times report,” said Anders Gyllenhaal, McClatchy’s vice president for news and Washington, D.C. editor.

The company based in Sacramento, California, hasn’t lodged a complaint with U.S. officials because it is still trying to figure out what exactly happened and when, Gyllenhaal added.

The U.S. National Security Agency sometimes shares intelligence information with New Zealand agencies under a long-standing arrangement known as “Five Eyes.” In addition to New Zealand and the U.S., the alliance includes Britain, Australia and Canada.

Snowden’s leaked information exposed the reach of the U.S. programs that monitor millions of telephone and Internet records inside and outside the U.S. Officials have said the surveillance tracks only metadata and not specific details like the contents of telephone calls. They say the surveillance programs have averted multiple terror attacks.

Enlarge In this Sept. 1, 2011 photo, author Nicky Hager speaks during a press conference in Wellington after the release of his book Other People's Wars. A report in the Sunday Star-Times newspaper said that the New Zealand military, assisted by U.S. spy agencies, collected phone metadata to monitor New Zealand's journalist Jon Stephenson. The story by journalist Hager said the military became unhappy at Stephenson's reporting on how it treated Afghan prisoners. New Zealand said Monday, July 29, 2013, there is no evidence that either the U.S. or the New Zealand military spied on journalist Stephenson in Afghanistan who was freelancing for American news organization McClatchy. (AP Photo/New Zealand Herald, Mark Mitchell) NEW ZEALAND OUT, AUSTRALIA OUT

In this Sept. 1, 2011 photo, author Nicky Hager speaks during a press conference in Wellington after the release of his book Other People's Wars. A report in the Sunday Star-Times newspaper said that the New Zealand military, assisted by U.S. spy agencies, collected phone metadata to monitor New Zealand's journalist Jon Stephenson. The story by journalist Hager said the military became unhappy at Stephenson's reporting on how it treated Afghan prisoners. New Zealand said Monday, July 29, 2013, there is no evidence that either the U.S. or the New Zealand military spied on journalist Stephenson in Afghanistan who was freelancing for American news organization McClatchy. (AP Photo/New Zealand Herald, Mark Mitchell) NEW ZEALAND OUT, AUSTRALIA OUT

Comments

Notice about comments:

Aiken Standard is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point.

We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click the X that appears in the upper right corner when you hover over a comment. This will send the comment to Facebook for review. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full terms and conditions.