I guess they are the regular thirties cut. That outfit is brilliant. Pretty much everything about it is what I like in a casual outfit. Well done (both to Simon for the clothes and Nik for the presentation).

Yeah, Simon's come a long way getting that look right. I'd call them regular 30s cut, too. Eric, I guess you're free to call them whatever you like. It's all relative, they would have been bags in the late 20s, but they're not crazy wide enough to make them too different from mid/late 30s trousers.

Nik is right, when people discuss Oxford Bags they tend to think of the comically exaggerated versions we see in the most famous photos. In reality, in most cases genuine 1920s Oxford Bags were actually no wider than standard 1930s flannels. For example, in March 1925, 22 inch hems were considered noteworthy and extreme and filled column inches of newspapers as being a revolutionary style. For much of the 1930s 22 inch hems were just identified as ordinary trousers, and nothing to be of note. Hence the whole notion of what might be considered 'Oxford Bags' is a rather tricky issue.