The latest in a string of damning information now indicates that the State Department even rejected embassy staff’s request for additional security prior to the attack and that securityÂ threats were present in Libya for months prior to September 11, when U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, two Navy SEALs and another American civil servant were killed.

“You cannot vote in November without knowing…just how malicious, and just how reckless this administration has been with the truth and the lives of Americans…”

The coup de grace for the Obama administration, however, was in blaming a YouTube video for the attacks on U.S. embassies in Cairo and Benghazi when they were in fact premeditated. Watch below as Beck goes point for point through a powerful timeline of events â€” both in the administration and across the Middle East â€” that remove any shred of doubt that, as Beck put it, a cover-up far exceeding the Watergate scandal is at play.

AÂ chronology of crucial moments leading up to and in the aftermath of the attacks is provided below courtesy of theÂ Heritage Foundation:

April 6: IED thrown over the fence of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

April 11: Gun battle erupts between armed groups two-and-a-half miles from the U.S. Consulate, including rocket-propelled grenades.

April 27: Two South African contractors are kidnapped by armed men, released unharmed.

May 1: Deputy Commander of U.S. Embassy Tripoli’s Local Guard Force is carjacked, beaten, and detained by armed youth.

May 1: British Embassy in Tripoli is attacked by a violent mob and set on fire. Other NATO embassies attacked as well.

May 3: The State DepartmentÂ declines a requestÂ from personnel concerned about security at the U.S. Embassy in Libya for a DC-3 plane to take them around the country.

May 22: Two rocket-propelled grenades are fired at the Benghazi office of the International Committee of the Red Cross, less than 1 mile from the U.S. Consulate.

June 6: A large IED destroys part of the security perimeter of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. Creates hole “big enough for 40 men to go through.”

June 10: A car carrying the British ambassador is attacked in Tripoli. Two bodyguards injured.

Late June: The building of the International Red Cross attacked again and closed down, leaving the U.S. flag as the only international one still flying in Benghazi, an obvious target.

August 6: Armed assailants carjack a vehicle with diplomatic plates operated by U.S. personnel.

September 28: Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper, Jr.,Â issues a statement backingÂ the Obama Administration’s changing story about the Libyan attack. Says facts are evolving.

October 2: CarneyÂ declines to commentÂ on reported requests from diplomats in Libya for additional security, citing the State Department’s internal investigation.

Beck went on to ask why the embassy was denied their repeated requests for additional security and why Stevens was even still present in Benghazi when the British embassy and Red Cross were “smart enough to leave.“ He also wondered why the FBI were not deployed to the scene until last week and spent a mere ”three hours” on the ground there.

“Whose idea was it to make up the video excuse?” Beck asked. He added his theory that Stevens “was our broker tasked with arming the Libyan rebels” and thatÂ eventually, whenÂ he “needed to get the weapons back,“ the deal ”went bad.”

“This is a massive institutional cover-up bigger than Watergate,” he slammed. It may be just “massive incompetence but you have been lied to in a massive and coordinated fashion.”

Beck suggested that the reason Obama is so focused on “Big Bird” currently is to detract attention away from this scandal and that the president is pandering to the Muslim Brotherhood byÂ condemningÂ the “slander of Islam.”

Imagine, pre-9/11/12, that you were responsible for arranging the defense of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Would you have considered American interests and personnel best protected by bringing in a local security outfit called the February 17 Martyrs Brigade?

The question has yet to come up in House hearings, but I think it holds the key to the Obama administration’s betrayal of the American people in “Benghazi-gate.” To an American with common sense not subverted by advanced degrees, the thought of putting Islamic “martyrs” in charge of American “infidels” in Benghazi â€“ which, fun fact, literally means “city of holy warriors” â€“ would trigger the inevitable “heck, no.” And that’s without even knowing what is significant about Feb. 17.

Imagine, pre-9/11/12, that you were responsible for arranging the defense of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Would you have considered American interests and personnel best protected by bringing in a local security outfit called the February 17 Martyrs Brigade?

The question has yet to come up in House hearings, but I think it holds the key to the Obama administration’s betrayal of the American people in “Benghazi-gate.” To an American with common sense not subverted by advanced degrees, the thought of putting Islamic “martyrs” in charge of American “infidels” in Benghazi â€“ which, fun fact, literally means “city of holy warriors” â€“ would trigger the inevitable “heck, no.” And that’s without even knowing what is significant about Feb. 17.

Imagine, pre-9/11/12, that you were responsible for arranging the defense of the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Would you have considered American interests and personnel best protected by bringing in a local security outfit called the February 17 Martyrs Brigade?

The question has yet to come up in House hearings, but I think it holds the key to the Obama administration’s betrayal of the American people in “Benghazi-gate.” To an American with common sense not subverted by advanced degrees, the thought of putting Islamic “martyrs” in charge of American “infidels” in Benghazi â€“ which, fun fact, literally means “city of holy warriors” â€“ would trigger the inevitable “heck, no.” And that’s without even knowing what is significant about Feb. 17.

With all due respect, I think there should be a recognition of distinction between the pro-Islam traitorous Obama Administration and the US. The vast majoriaty of Americans, who do not share the neo-Communist views in the WH. Or his actions.

Agree – I take that for granted. When I state that the US has joined alQaeda, it is the government of the US that has done so. It uses all the force available to it. This arises from the fact, that the the power of the US government arises from good, decent and loyal Americans.

One carry this even further. Not all the Congress, civil servants, Senate, or the Armed forces of the USA have joined alQaeda. But yet, as the Obama administration has the power to order the Armed forces to give assistance to alQaeda, it is in effect the USA that is doing so.

I hope and pray that Americans have sense enough to remove Obama from office. If they vote for him again, then anything that happens after – such as the US siding with the MB and Iran against Israel, it will then be quite fair to state that it is America that is the enemy of Israel and the West.

On one level, I know and get your meaning. IMHO, it is utterly disgusting that the US govt. would work with Al Q. and the Taliban.

You and I, both know that there is only one way to deal with these savages and there is only one thing they understand. These are not civilized people where diplomacy works. In fact we see, what they do to western symbols of diplomacy -RIP Christopher Stevens.

In the last three months, I have come across many Americans, that have told me that they regret voting for Obama. The only way I see the Manchurian candidate get reelected is through voter fraud and Soros owned company Scytl. I also, include in my interactions with many members of the American military, who do not like, nor trust the current president.

If Obama is reelected. I sincerely believe that for the first time in American history, there will be a Military Coup and a second Civil War in America.

If reelected, watch for a more aggressive push for gun control and the formation of a new personal army of the future Tyrant in chief, with his new “militia”. Mostly composed of angry black men, via the new black panthers.