ENGLISH Hitler’s love for the British people

by John de Nugent on April 8, 2013

Kudos coming in on the blog below already:

Hitlers admiration of the British is indeed an undeniable fact, but must be kept [by the Jewsmedia] from the goy for obvious reasons. Thank you for another historically accurate and valuable article, John. --- Professor Ray Goodwin, Texas

A British comrade wrote me yesterday, making me grieve:

"It's best not to mention England today ... Oh how the mighty are fallen! All I see is white single mothers pushing prams full of idiotic brown kids. Also, the recent influx of foreigners has caused a massive demand for housing. We're only a small island, but the new homes are going to be built on the countryside -- which will have a terrible impact on our wildlife. Oh, and to feed all the new 'people' we've now become a net importer of food."

As for that:

"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed, lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work instead of living on public assistance." - Senator Cicero of Rome, 55 BC.....

A friend, financial donor and former US Marine officer from Florida wrote me (after visiting an English lady friend near Oxford):

London was a multiculti hell hole, cold, unfriendly and ugly, but the small villages near Oxford were still wonderful.

I can only say this, that the poor English people were the first great white nation to be totally taken over by jews when the Bank of England came in in 1694, but then it was a Dutch king ruling Britain who did it -- and the Dutch were already, via Calvinism, jew-worshippers and usurers.

(One of the secret main motives in becoming Protestant was it allowed you, unlike Catholics or Eastern Orthodox, to lend money at interest just like the Jews. The Protestants always emphasized the very Jewish Old Testament, and even many gave their kids Old Testament jewish names, not Christian names. Hence our "Abraham" Lincoln, for example, or all the early Anglo-American pioneers named Jeremiah, Obadiah, Isaac, etc. No Catholic or Orthodox has EVER named his child "Abraham," not after the supposed father of the Jews! The cursed Jews who had killed Christ and lost the covenant with God via deicide!)

My English grandfather from Yorkshire, John Thomas Colwell, was a wonderful man (see my video about him at the very end of this blog, below; he is seated next to his wife, my late grandmother, Elizabeth Angell, also of pure English stock, and in front of their 1792 house in Glocester [sic], Rhode Island),

...and reminds me of a radio broadcast back to Eire that Conor Cruise O'Brien did about his experiences as an Irishman with the English working class, often very, very decent, honest, punctual, loyal chaps you could count on. And that was the conciliatory gist of what O'Brien said by radio to his countrymen: never be angry at the English common people for what their government does. They have no say; they never have, not since the Norman Conquest!

As my essay here points out, the Normans brought in the Jews in 1066 and the Jews have now completely intermarried with the aristocracy and form almost the entire plutocracy.

We all know that the people in any white nation under jew control have no say in what their government does, and especially not in a jew-manipulated "democracy"!

This blog is really from my heart to the Brits. From all that British comrades write me, it is now, at least in the cities, hell on earth in every way.

For the British theme, here are two important, and I dare say, very INTERESTING videos I recorded in 2011.

For the first, found below, please watch from 18:26 to the end (36:18), a total of 17 minutes 52 seconds. (Click on the player and let it buffer for two minutes, then slide the circle forward to 18:26.)

Here William Joyce is discussed, a Brit who broadcast against Churchill throughout the war from Germany, to which he had fled to avoid arrest by Churchill, and was hanged afterward for stating the truth; the Daily Mail article on bitter British WWII vets who swore they never fought for what the UK has become today, a nation of black and muslim immigrants and "yobs"; and Adolf Hitler, the man who felt deep affection for the British people and for one very special Brit who saved his life, a Victoria Cross winner named Henry Tandy....

In the second video, also found below, please watch from the beginning, 0:00, to 14:34.

Thank you for your support and I wish you all the best once "back" in Britain. I never had a chance to visit the land of my ancestors, and now I never shall, because I refuse categorically to go into airports, because I would then have to travel disarmed. Many activists have been arrested by NWO goons in airports; the great French revisionist Robert Faurisson never flies for that one reason. I am armed and ready to fight to the death at any moment. I sleep with a pistol by my side and take it with me even to the bathroom at 3 a.m. This is the one and only reason I have not yet been arrested like countless others.

In America we have no hate-speech laws, but the regime finds ways to trump up outrageous charges regarding supposed ordinary crimes. If they are sure one will not resist, and can be "arrested without incident," then one can be guaranteed that they will come once you start making serious waves.

There is a great karmic settling of accounts going on. We Americans and the Brits (the Germans lumped us together as "die Anglo-Amerikaner") bombed Germany almost back to the Stone Age when it was trying to save the white race and warn it against the Jews. The great industrialist Henry Ford and the great aviator Charles Lindbergh warned America, and the public heard the message -- and ignored it. In Britain many voices also were raised against the pro-Jewish, anti-German madness. What I am saying as the son of a Marine Corps veteran in WWII is that WE knew the war was wrong. In my ancestral house, Roosevelt was LOATHED, and it was said in that home and in many, many millions of others, "Never use that man's name in my house," and Roosevelt was labeled only "that man in the White House," never "President Roosevelt."

Yet off my dad marched to war. WE of British stock, WE did this:

Worst of all is that most American and British officers were right-wing conservatives and anti-Jewish themselves, and they knew that already WWI had been one big, blood-soaked, insane lie.

Canadian soldier's skeleton found in a WWI trench in France

But they knowingly kept their mouths shut as in turn WWII rolled around, and massive crimes and war-criminal orders were carried out under their direction. All they did was have another swig of whiskey, and "obey orders"!

A Canadian of German descent wrote me her heart-rending story.

Our grade 7 teacher was of English descent and used to streak back and forth in front of the class, shouting out, "The English are Supreme." At the beginning of the school year she would ask everyone's nationality and we (our family) said we were Canadian, as that is where we were born. She did not let up on us until we "confessed" we were "German."

We, being of German blood, had to "accuse" ourselves of being German, and could not even identify ourselves as being Canadian, because, as she said, "There is no such thing as a Canadian!" She told us we would not be allowed back in class if we had not "accused" ourselves of being German. Today I would tell her to take her class and shove it --because if that was education, we did not need it. It was a test period to see how much crap we would/could take from the fricken school, church and home as well. They did not break us but it was for much of the time a pure waste of time. We would have been better off learning to swim, dance, ride a horse, and reading good literature and history than being brainwashed to hate our own heritage.

Well, now, God Save the Queen, they are teaching anal sex to our Canadian children in schools, as in your Saturday blog, John [see the link right below], and everything twisted is now "normal"! God help us.

I cannot think of a more worthy cause for Britons today, white brother, than regaining the natural right of self-defense by owning guns again. I would acquire one regardless of the cost and risk, and if you do not, my words may come back to haunt you.

Piers Morgan is infamous in America for shoving British-style gun control down American throats every other broadcast he does on CNN.

Unjust laws must not be obeyed; that is the lesson of WWII. We are in this fine mess now -- utter hell in the RSA and approaching the level of hell in the UK and USA -- because our fathers and grandfathers obeyed wrongful "orders" and carried out vile "laws" to annihilate Hitler and his brave people, who in reality were fighting for us all.

Lloyd George, the British prime minister during most of WWI, wrote in the Daily Express (London), on November 17, 1936 (http://www.zupdom.com/icons-multimedia/ClientsArea/HoH/LIBARC/ARCHIVE/Chapters/Stabiliz/Foreign/LloydGeo.html)

I have now seen the famous German Leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods - and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country - there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvellous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook. He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement has made a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war - broken, dejected, and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and importance. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers. There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change.

One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic, dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, a resolute will and a dauntless heart. He is not merely in name but in fact the national Leader. He has made them safe against potential enemies by whom they were surrounded. He is also securing them against that constant dread of starvation, which is one of the poignant memories of the last years of the War and the first years of the Peace. Over 700,000 died of sheer hunger in those dark years. You can still see the effect in the physique of those who were born into that bleak world.

Scenes in color of the 1936 visit of Lloyd George to Berchtesgaden and Hitler's mountain home

The fact that Hitler has rescued his country from the fear of a repetition of that period of despair, penury and humiliation has given him unchallenged authority in modern Germany. As to his popularity, especially among the youth of Germany, there can be no manner of doubt. The old trust him; the young idolise him. It is not the admiration accorded to a popular Leader. It is the worship of a national hero who has saved his country from utter despondency and degradation.

It is true that public criticism of the Government is forbidden in every form. That does not mean that criticism is absent. I have heard the speeches of prominent Nazi orators freely condemned. But not a word of criticism or of disapproval have I heard of Hitler. He is as immune from criticism as a king in a monarchical country. He is something more. He is the George Washington of Germany - the man who won for his country independence from all her oppressors. To those who have not actually seen and sensed the way Hitler reigns over the heart and mind of Germany this description may appear extravagant. All the same, it is the bare truth.

This great people will work better, sacrifice more, and, if necessary, fight with greater resolution because Hitler asks them to do so. Those who do not comprehend this central fact cannot judge the present possibilities of modern Germany.

You might be interested also in this video I did regarding my late grandfather from Yorkshire. It has an astounding theme: a voice from the dead.

We who have woken up here in Britain are waiting to see if our "poser" Nigel Farage has the courage of his "convictions" as his Party, UKIP [United Kingdom Independence Party], rollercoasters towards a credible defeat of the evil, corrupt, and duplicitous, Lib-Lab-Con [Liberal Democrats, Labor and Conservative]parliament in Westminster.

If he lets us all down then the ballot box may as well be buried, and lawful rebellion commence. I pray that a genuine leader identical to you springs out of the fog to lead us to a victory over Cameron & Co! They are but puppets of the Rothschild Zionists.

God bless you and all true patriots in the USA.

Doug L.

***

I replied:

***

Dear comrade,

Thanks for this encouragement.

You know what is great about this oppression and genocide?

It is on the other hand causing such a feeling of white unity!

It is the blacks, Jews, Chinese and Muslims who are making us realize how much we have in common!

I stay very aware of happenings in the UK, land of my ancestors. In New England, so many of our place names are just like yours in southern England. My aunt and uncle lived in Plymouth, in Massachusetts. I often went to Newport in Rhode Island, and on the way was Portsmouth, R.I., my grandparents lived in Gloucester, R.I., and I grew up in Barrington, R.I., named after yours in Cambridgeshire. Our region was called "New England."

But what I see now appalls me: Lord Feldman, chairman until Sept. 2012 of the Tories; David Cameron, part-Jew PM (Norman name); and Speaker of the House John Bercow, openly Jewish. Beyond that, both Prince William and Kate are part-Jewish, as my blog proved when they wed.

It is not just his nose, either.

Kid William

Look at the nasty jewboy thugface of Pippa's brother....

And evidence suggests Princess Diana was really the offspring of Lord Goldsmith, albeit with peroxide tresses.

Then I read about your Lord "Ahmed" and Baroness "Warsi" ("Im a woman; Im not white").... Good grief!

I note that Nigel Farage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Farage) is the son of a City of London stockbroker and then worked in the City. "In 1982 he joined the London commodity brokerage firm Drexel Burnham Lambert.[11] In 1986, he joined Credit Lyonnais Rouse.[11] He joined Refco in 1994, and Natixis Metals in 2003."

The head of Natixis Metals, headquartered in Paris, is François Pérol, (http://www.natixis.com/natixis/jcms/ala_5372/board-of-directors) "secrétaire général adjoint de lÉlysée sous Sarkozy. Cest un associé-gérant de la Banque Rothschild." (= "Deputy Secretary General of the Elysee [presidential palace] [under Nicolas Sarkozy]. This is a Managing Partner of Rothschild Bank.")

In his favor, barely, is that he has been married to a German woman since 1999, which is rather non-judeophilic, actually, and he did also run for Parliament against John Bercow, the first open Jew in Britain ever in 600 years to become Speaker of the House of Commons.

Also, Farage could have been killed in a plane crash, and the pilot was subsequently indicted for making death threats against him. That might mean Nigel is (was?) sincerely anti-NWO, or it might mean that he did start out sincere -- and yet perhaps no longer is -- after this possible assassination attempt which may have terrified him.

In the USA, let me assure you, the FBI constantly kills people via small-plan accidents. IMO Franklin Roosevelt had Joseph Kennedy's oldest son murdered in WWII in a plane "accident." (FDR's own son, Col. Elliott Roosevelt, was in fact piloting by amazing coincidence the US plane directly behind Kennedy's when it mysteriously exploded in mid-air. As FDR once admitted: "In politics there are no coincidences. If something happened, it is because someone wanted it to happen that way.")

My sense of Farage is like my view of PM Neville Chamberlain -- a more or less good man who under fire has not enough spine to stand up to the Jews when-push-comes-to-shove.

Chamberlain worked for peace in 1938 at the Munich conference between Germany and Britain, waved a signed document from Hitler and the British crowd loved him when he proclaimed "Peace in our time!"...... BUT by 1939, to keep his prime ministership though the tide shifted, he too tended toward the war party, and cravenly gave Poland's ultra-nationalists the infamous "guarantee" which directly caused WWII.

(When Poles began massacring German civilians, all summer long, of the huge German minority in western Poland in 1939, what exactly was Germany supposed to do? Would Britain have sat idly by if thousands of its civilians were being murdered by Poles, or Mexicans, or the French? OF COURSE NOT!)

Yet Chamberlain (always these Norman names, Farage, Chamberlain, de Nugent ;-)) told US ambassador Joseph Kennedy (father of the future US president) that it was "the Jews" who forced Britain into the war.

The real issue, British comrade, is that WHEN, not IF, Nigel Farage betrays you (and it is said in the US that "all politicians let you down") how on earth CAN you carry out any sort of "Lawful Rebellion" of which you wrote?

You have instead, literally (and I say this after decades of studying my beloved ancestral country) not a democracy, and not a monarchy either, except on paper, but instead in reality one of the most wicked, sinister, brutal, ruthless and monstrous secret governments on earth, a Jewish-led London pedophilocracy that will stop at nothing to crush you and all rebels. Look how they covered up for decades the vile pedoswine Jimmy Savile. These people are beyond the word evil. They are SATANIC.

This is why I very honestly and sincerely believe that the best way to save Britain is, ironically, to support me in America, where we still have 1) guns 2) free speech, and 3) a tradition of violent and successful revolution.

And let me go into our common national karmas. All true British nationalists must for one moment put aside their pride (which, as with all white nations nowadays, relates mostly to a glorious past, not to the abject present), and may each true lover of Britain pray a real prayer to our heavenly Father and say:

I am proud to be British, but I am also ashamed of this, that we destroyed Germany when it was fighting under Hitler to save the whole western world from the Jews and the tidal wave of third-world races.

I ask God's forgiveness that in February 1945 over Dresden, Saxony, Germany we the Anglo-Saxons killed 500,000 of our brothers, the German-Saxons.

We roasted and blasted our own kin -- for the Jews. The smoke and flames went up for days, then the stench of a half-million dead bodies. We holocausted with the RAF and its Lancaster bombers the Germans when THEY were fighting desperately against bolshevik jewry for US.

(Disgustingly, our American P-51 Mustangs of the US Army Air Force came on the last day of the Dresden holocaust and strafed the Elbe riverbanks where refugees, many of them hospital patients, had huddled ----- so to kill even more innocents, and our US warplanes machine-gunned Saxon civilians who had jumped into the Elbe River. They did this after dropping leaflets urging Germans to move to the riverbanks as a safe area.)

I do not believe, comrade Douglas, that God will let Britain survive, or my own nation of America, the great offshoot of yours, unless you and we come to this same confession:

Nostra culpa, nostra maxima culpa!

And then this too:

Solutreanism is the realization we are not merely "white" of skin. We are ARYANS, the noblest and mightiest race of mankind! Only defeatism can defeat us!

JdN

==============DONATE BECAUSE DESPITE PERSECUTION WE HAVE GUNS, FREE SPEECH AND A WINNABLE ELECTION FOR SHERIFF HERE

The problem is that even the many anti-Obama congressmen lack the guts to go all the way and say this skinny negro isn't even a US citizen, he was not born on US soil, he cannot therefore under the US Constitution be the President -- and he cannot sign any bills into law or order any troops to go anywhere!

Someone (me) has to stop the whole show, turn up the lights, lower the curtain, bring out the hook, and pull the fraud offstage. ;-) We must attack the fundamental issue first that Barack Hussein Obama of Kenya is not the President of the United States. Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona established this after a massive investigation of the fraudulent "long-form birth certificate" that Obama put up on the official presidential website, whitehouse.gov.

For this crime alone of publishing a fraudulent document, Obama is guilty of a crime punishable by five years in prison. (Photoshop professsionals were debunking the birth certificate within hours of it going online. In fact, they said it was lousy counterfeiting, not even skilful fraud. ;-))

Because this man in the White House, Obama (real name Barry Soetoro) is capable of great evil as long as people think and accept that he is the president -- when he is a lowdown fraud, a con man and blackmailable as such -- debunking his presidency itself must be Job One.

I am extremely busy running for sheriff, as you seem to not have noticed….or cared about, however:

1) political correctness. Aryans are nordic. From Ireland to Iran to Aryavarta (India) the upper caste was very blond nordic conquerors.

2) Yes, As a result of the 1930s German Ahnenerbe expeditions the Reich elite knew the Antarctic was perfect for the survival of secret military bases. The Reich certainly knew after the mega-catastrophe of Stalingrad that it needed a Plan B so that the regime would survive the war — even if Germany itself were to be occupied.

The SS especially knew it was never about ONLY Germany, but the fate of the whole Aryan race. Their mission was Germany, but more than just Germany. Germany was also a powerful but inadequate means 1933-45 to a higher end, the salvation of the nordic race.

I used to doubt all this Antarctic theme as pure, wishful fantasy, but no more.

It is no different from Marx escaping to London, or Trotsky going to New York, or Lenin to Zurich, or the Ayatollah Khomeini to Paris.

Like them, the National Socialists young elite in 1945 had to âget out of Dodge.â

And they took the finest tech they had, and are planning a huge comeback â but when THEY are ready with the quantity of materiÃ¨l needed for victory. The Reich lost in 1945 because of insufficient production quantity only.

This time must be different.

What this means is twofold:

1) there was no peace treaty between the Allies and the Reich because the shooting war was still going on, as seen by the sudden end of Operation Highjump, and it continues now, though sporadically;

2) the Reich will NOT intervene until they decide the time is right. Right for the Reich!

Meanwhile, the white race in the Jew-occupied countries will have to continue to suffer and resist until then, with no magic rescue by Third Reich UFOs planned for the day after tomorrow.

The Reich has not been building up their armadas for 67 years to throw it away in a precipitate move just because WE are suffering, because WE want THEM to throw all caution to the wind and save US now because life is tough — while we ourselves do NOTHING.

Look at the average white person: a fat, cowardly, beer-drinking, football-watching oaf who KNOWS his nation is being destroyed and yet rejects all our WN facts, no matter how tactfully we present them.

Look at the average WN. I am clearly running a vital campaign for a winnable office, and yet over 99% of WNs who read my blog send no money or support of any kind, and prefer to continue ad infinitum and ad nauseam to “inform themselves” even more, mouse-clicking for thousands of hours around the Internet to read more and more and more and MORE about the Jews, or the blacks, the muslims, the Chinese, and the gays, and then they release their frustration only by discussing with other WNs just how bad our enemies are, and wishing Hitler would come back.

Should the Reich hurry up all its military planning against ZOG to rush in and save âBubbaâ and his equally fat daughter who was knocked up by a negro??

Should the Reich, from the Antarctic, attack the Allies before they are fully ready because WNs refuse to support their own leaders or do anything at all but moan?

I have been reading Gustave Le Bon, whom Hitler read as a teen in Vienna, and I wish I had read him years ago. His Psychology of the Masses has proven all too true. (I can say this after five years of trying to get something serious going on the basis of a good blog and I hope, good videos as well, which I imagined would lead to actual financial support to run for office.)

People do things only because they see other people doing things. If no one makes the first move to 1) lead or 2) follow the leader who steps forward, then nothing happens.

I wrote an admirer of the Finn Kai Murros:

Murros is all about how the masses will rise up because the cornered beast in us will come out. No, the white masses absolutely will not rise up.

The White South Africans — whose ancestors mostly were the extremely brave Boers — are being murdered, raped and burned alive every single day — and yet they are not rising up, and there is no worse fate than what they are undergoing RIGHT NOW.

I asked Murros to respond and got only silence. Some of his insights are really great â but the greatest insight is that without a leader white people do absolutely nothing except drink beer and watch football. The priority then becomes identifying that leader,supporting that leader, defending that leader and fighting for that leader.

Since 1994 Murros has been preaching the masses will rise up and so far zip. There must be a second Hitler for us.

Unfortunately, the other side of the coin is that he and his first brought the Jews in, as brutal and rapacious tax farmers, squeezing the money out of the Anglo-Saxons, and as long as Jews caused the Normans no trouble, just their enslaved Saxons, they allowed the Jews to ritually murder English children for decades, and through usury to take over much of the English economy.

It was only when riots broke out, decades of riots, and the people protested violently that his sheriffs were taking bribes from Jews to do nothing about this foul crime of ritual murder of English children, that he finally acted.

And when he expelled the Jews, all their property became his. So much for the purity of his motives.

From Wikipedia, which reveass many interesting things in the passage below, though of course whitewashed with politically correct remarks and wording:

***

Norman England, 1066â1290
Main article: History of the Jews in England (1066â1290)

There is no evidence of Jews residing in England before the Norman Conquest. The few references in the Anglo-Saxon Church laws relate to Jewish practices about Easter. William of Malmesbury states that William the Conqueror brought Jews from Rouen to England. William the Conqueror’s object may be inferred: his policy was to get feudal dues paid to the royal treasury in coin rather than in kind, and for this purpose it was necessary to have a body of men scattered through the country that would supply quantities of coin.[5]Status of Jews

At first the status of Jews was not strictly determined. An attempt was made to introduce the continental principle that Jews and all their possessions were the king’s property, and a clause to that effect was inserted under Henry I in some manuscripts of the so-called Leges Edwardi Confessoris (“Laws of Edward the Confessor”). Henry granted a charter to Rabbi Joseph, the chief Rabbi of London, and his followers. Under this charter, Jews were permitted to move about the country without paying tolls, to buy and sell, to sell their pledges after holding them a year and a day, to be tried by their peers, and to be sworn on the Torah rather than on a Christian Bible. Special weight was attributed to a Jew’s oath, which was valid against that of twelve Christians. The sixth clause of the charter was specially important: it granted to Jews the right to move wherever they wanted, as if these were the king’s own property (“sicut res propriÃ¦ nostrÃ¦”).[6]Attitudes of the kings
Jewish communities in Medieval England

Gentile-Jewish relations in England were disturbed under King Stephen, who burned down the house of a Jew in Oxford (some accounts say with a Jew in it) because he refused to pay a contribution to the king’s expenses. In 1144 came the first report in history of the blood libel [what rot: Jews WERE murdering Christian children and draining their blood for use in dried matzoh crackers to eat; see Israeli professor Ariel Toaf’s terifying Blood Passsover book! http://bloodpassover.com] against Jews; it came up in the case of William of Norwich (1144).[7] Julius finds that the English were endlessly imaginative in inventing anti-Semitic allegations. He says that England became the “principal promoter, and indeed in some sense the inventor of literary anti-Semitism.”[8] Julius argues that blood libel is the key, because it incorporates the themes that Jews are malevolent, constantly conspiring against Christians, powerful, and merciless. Variations include stories about Jews poisoning wells, twisting minds, and buying and selling Christian souls and bodies. [All true!]

While the crusaders were killing Jews in Germany, outbursts against Jews in England were, according to Jewish chroniclers, prevented by King Stephen.[9]

With the restoration of order under Henry II, Jews renewed their activity. Within five years of his accession Jews were found at London, Oxford, Cambridge, Norwich, Thetford, Bungay, Canterbury, Winchester, Newport, Stafford, Windsor, and Reading. Yet they were not permitted to bury their dead elsewhere than in London, a restriction which was not removed till 1177. Their spread throughout the country enabled the king to draw upon them as occasion demanded. He repaid them by demand notes on the sheriffs of the counties, who accounted for payments thus made in the half-yearly accounts on the pipe rolls (see Aaron of Lincoln). Strongbow’s conquest of Ireland (1170) was financed by Josce, a Jew of Gloucester; and the king accordingly fined Josce for having lent money to those under his displeasure. As a rule, however, Henry II does not appear to have limited in any way the financial activity of Jews. The favorable position of English Jews was shown, among other things, by the visit of Abraham ibn Ezra in 1158, by that of Isaac of Chernigov in 1181, and by the resort to England of Jews who were exiled from France by Philip Augustus in 1182, among them probably being Judah Sir Leon of Paris.[10]

In 1168, when concluding an alliance with Frederick Barbarossa, Henry II seized the chief representatives of Jews and sent them over into Normandy, while tallaging the rest 5,000 marks.[11] When, however, he asked the rest of the country to pay a tithe for the crusade against Saladin in 1188, he demanded a quarter of Jewish chattels. The so-called “Saladin tithe” was reckoned at Â£70,000, the quarter at Â£60,000.

In other words,

the value of the personal property of Jews was regarded as one-fourth that of the whole country.

It is improbable, however, that the whole amount was paid at once, as for many years after the imposition of the tallage arrears were demanded from the recalcitrant Jews.[12]

In this period, Aaron of Lincoln is believed to have been the wealthiest man in 12th century Britain, it is estimated that his wealth may have exceeded that of the King.[13] The king had probably been led to make this large demand on English Jewry by the surprising windfall which came to his treasury at Aaron’s death. All property obtained by usury, whether by Jew or by Christian, fell into the king’s hands on the death of the usurer; Aaron of Lincoln’s estate included Â£15,000 of debts owed to him. Besides this, a large treasure came into the king’s hands, which, however, was lost on being sent over to Normandy. A special branch of the treasury, constituted in order to deal with this large account, was known as “Aaron’s Exchequer”.[14]

In this era, Jews lived on good terms with their non-Jewish neighbors [oh, really? After all., what is a little ritual murder of children among friends?], including the clergy. They entered churches freely, and took refuge in the abbeys in times of commotion. Some Jews lived in opulent houses, and helped to build a large number of the abbeys and monasteries of the country [ =) lent money for construction at interest!].

However, by the end of Henry’s reign they had incurred the ill will of the upper classes. Anti-Jewish sentiment, fostered by the Crusades, during the latter part of the reign of Henry, spread throughout the nation.[15]Persecution and Expulsion
Main articles: Edict of Expulsion and Statute of the Jewry

Persecution of England’s Jews continued, with massacres at London[16] and York[17] during the Crusades. [Now, the English are well-known to be a calm and understated people, Whatever CAUSED these massacres?] This antipathy eventually culminated in the expulsion of all Jews from the country in 1290. Most were only allowed to take what they could carry. [Longshanks took the rest, all ill-gotten gains squeezed out of the Anglo-Saxon people!!] A small number of Jews favored by the king were permitted to sell their properties first. Almost all evidence of a Jewish presence in England would have been wiped out if it had not been for the efforts of one monk, Gregory of Huntingdon, who purchased all the Jewish texts he could to begin translating them.[18]

From then until 1655, there is nearly no official record of Jews in England.

***

Longshank’s criminal invasion of Scotland (see the fate of the heroic William Wallace, and ask yourself how a Scot absurdly can be defamed as a rebel against England, and then to boot hideously torturing and executing him, as the famous Mel Gibson film “Braveheart” vividly showed), you can see from that alone what a wicked man the Norman ruler Longshanks was.

And I say this being of distant part-Norman blood myself. The Normans were a perfect example of how Nordic and Scandinavian blood does NOT preclude a man becoming a monster. Norway, Denmark and Sweden today are full of blond race traitors who bring in more muslim gang rapists daily to torment their own people,.,to harm their own womenfolk and destroy the lives of blond children.

I would rather have a beer any day with Brother Nathanael Kapner, or Gilad Atzmon, full-blooded Jews, than with a blond traitor. As Cicero said, the traitor among our own countrymen, who looks and acts like us, and lowers our guard, is far more dangerous than the obvious racial stranger.

As long as the Jews tax-farmed the English, squeezing them dry to fund more Norman castles and more unprovoked wars of conquest, the Normans were fine with the Jews. It took decades of unrest and outrage before Edward I. finally acted, and then he did so to line his own pockets.

In regards to Roosevelt I have heard older Americans refer to this political criminal as “that gimp in the white house”. And world war 2 as “a war for the Jews”. Since when did a pre war prime minister of Britain take orders from a US president? Why didn’t Chamberlain tell FDR that it was a European matter and had nothing to do with him? Was Chamberlain being blackmailed or did Roosevelt have dirt on him the same way he had dirt on Joseph Kennedy so that JFK’s father would not protest the imprisonment of Tyler Kent? Your father like so many others went and did the bidding of people who hated his guts. It would be interesting to find out the number of conscientious objectors during WW2 – men who had the courage of their convictions and refused to fight for the Jews as opposed to those who were pacifists or refused to fight for religious reasons eg Jehovah’s Witnesses.

There was a huge war party in Britain, led by the sellout traitor Churchill, called “the Focus.” Historian David Irving has written and spoken extensively about it. Of course, what made their already existing cause more effective was the knowledge ithat IF Britain went to war with Germany, eventually FDR would get the US involved on the British side.

Churchill himself said that when Germany began trading by barter, no longer exchanging reichsmarks for pounds to buy foreign products, that was when the City of London became radically anti-German. Until then the Reich had been seen as a bulwark against communism that had to be preserved, and this also was the view of many on Wall Street in the USA. (The Street had on fact invested heavily in the German economy in the Weimar Republic days.)

As for my father, he, like many others, chose to fight the Japanese in the Pacific with the US Marines rather than kill Germans as a soldier in the US Army.

There was a strong feeling in America about the “yellow peril” back then, and some Japanese atrocities against white prisoners (British, American and Australians) after Pearl Harbor made rightwing, racially conscious Americans absolutely furious at the “little yellow bastards,” as was said back then.