"the degree of a nation or society's embrace of Multiculturalism and PC is related directly to the amount of equality and even social superiority between women, on the one hand, and men on the other. That the more most women are equal or slightly superior to most men, the more the society will broadly embrace PC and Multiculturalism. And that further, the more the ELITES are equal among genders, or women elites are slightly superior to most (but not all) male elites, the more the elites will whole-heartedly embrace Multiculturalism and PC."

‎"Women are hard-wired to crave dominance. Need it, want, do anything for it. Including import lots of dominant Muslim men, in the hope of transforming the nation into a place filled with dominant, sexy A-holes that women crave."

"Sweden is importing basically, Muslim bad boys, making excuses for rapes and assaults, embracing PC, and loathing its history, culture, and values, because it is run in the main part to appeal to women (if not run by them directly) and there is nothing Women in the West HATE HATE HATE more than a Beta male. Or a Beta Male society. It wasn't always so, but it is today."

Yes, women hate betas for not being alphas. It is racially TRAGIC then that most white men were never told by their useless slut single mums or by their absent fathers that they should make something of themselves or no decent woman is ever going to give them the time of day.

Even the ugliest man will get his end away if he has money to throw around.

So the white working classes think the government is shutting them up by calling them racist every time they complain about immigration.

This is of course common knowledge in nationalist circles. Remember how ex-Prime Minister Gordon Brown described Mrs Gillian Duffy, a life-long Labour supporter as "that bigoted woman" when she complained about immigration?

Those who complain about immigration are the party poopers of liberalism. They are rather like the man who got bitten by the shark in The Beach. The story is about a hippy community on a paradise island led by an Sal, an older woman, whose purpose is to keep the community undiscovered by the outside world.

When the unfortunate Christo got bitten, he did not recover but instead moaned and groaned so demoralisingly and piteously that this community that was supposed to be based on love and mutual respect for each other could not bear his cries of pain any more and took him to the middle of the jungle to die.

And then they partied on.

His life could have been saved by calling for medical assistance but that would have spoiled their fun, so Sal (played by Tilda Swinton) would rather this dispensable man die to avoid inconvenience to herself and her hippy paradise island community.

Sal represents the matriarchy and Christo, the dispensable beta male whom she thinks is not worth curing, certainly not at her expense and inconvenience, is analogous to the white no longer working classes.

Saturday, 26 November 2011

How terribly sad if the poor nations should look to the West and think,

"Oh, look: they have money and they are mostly sluts and bastards who screw around when they are under-aged, become syphilitic in their teens and have variously-fathered feral bastards who will become the next generations of criminals and looters. When more bastards are born than legitimate babies, the politicians are too afraid to condemn the sluts of bastards, because there are so many of them. Let us do like they do and become wealthy and powerful like them."

REASONS WHY UKIP SHOULD ADMIT ME EVEN THOUGH I WAS ONCE A MEMBER OF THE BNP

I used to be a member of UKIP.

My Eurosceptic credentials are impeccable.

I was one of Bill Cash MP’s volunteers during the passage of the Maastricht Bill through the House of Lords at Committee Stage.

I may have said controversial things but never anything racist, for I believe any apparent differences between the races have their roots in environment and culture rather than race and genetics.

The fact that I am non-white should attract non-white voters to UKIP.

I am known to the Muslims and they are by no means hostile even though they are aware of past association with the BNP.

My association with the BNP would help to attract more members to the UKIP, which would be a good thing because it would show that UKIP are not the PC cowards they are who bore and frustrate voters by their fear of being accused of racism.

My legal training would be useful to UKIP.

My communication skills would be useful to UKIP, particularly in my capacity as Press Officer or Director of Communications.

The fact that I am controversial would attract publicity for UKIP. All publicity is good publicity, if managed skilfully.

I have a coherent and worked-out ideology as well as a political strategy on how the Eurosceptic parties can best collaborate to inflict maximum damage on the LibLabCon.

While I am aware that there will be UKIP members who will object to my admission, they will not be able to prove that I am racist or cite anything racist I may have said. Their objections are in any case personal (because I have offended them) or personal ambition (how they would hate to see me benefit from having the courage to tell the truth as I see it, instead of cowering and cringing like them with ambiguous non-committal pronouncements designed to avoid giving offence to those who should be criticised) or rooted in an irrational fear of being associated with someone associated with a party known to be “racist”.

I may be able to persuade other experienced and prominent members of the BNP to join UKIP which would demoralize what is left of the BNP, causing yet more defections.

I have devised a method of cleansing such ex-BNP members of the taint of racism.

I have devised a Code of Conduct for Members which I believe would make relations between members more co-operative and comradely.

The prohibition against ex-BNP members joining UKIP is in any case ultra vires.

The only reason to NOT admit me is if you really think UKIP would have fewer votes because I am a member, and that is most unlikely, as I am now already known for thinking the unthinkable, saying the unsayable, telling the truth as I see it and having perfect command of all my arguments.

Foreign-born though I am, non-white though I am, I speak for the British better than the indigenous British politicians can speak for the British, and I am not afraid to say what needs to be said, without fear of favour. If you listen carefully you will hear, up and down the nation, the liberals quaking in their boots and the Vampire of Feminism hissing with rage, for she fears the light of Truth and the revelation of Reason that will demonstrate her dementia, incompetence and the unwarranted burden she places on this country by condoning and sponsoring widespread illegitimacy, whose talents she wastes and whose wealth she squanders on her useless projects to demonstrate her status - the status of being so privileged she is far removed from reality and can defy common sense - and her endless indiscriminate nauseating stinking toxic discharge of compassion and tolerance of all that is evil and destructive in society. Let us now drive a stake through her heart, before night falls again .....

In politics, even the truths you think are self-evident are regarded as lunatic nonsense by your enemies, who will mock, abuse and slander you.

Those who want to be chefs and then complain about the heat making their faces shine are not made of the right stuff.

Women will always have their chastity, appearance, sanity as well as their political views derided, so they need to be four times as tough as men and twice as clever before they even deserve to do well.

Once they have shown that they deserve to do well, they will be loved and hated with greater intensity than a mere male politician.

Thursday, 24 November 2011

If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things.

If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success.

When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish.

When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded.

When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot.

Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect."

(Analects XIII, 3, tr. Legge)

To be a racist is the worst thing to be, but what is a racist and what constitutes racism?

Is complaining about immigration racism and bigotry?

Is BASTARDY a good thing?

Slut Single Mums are mothers of bastards. What is wrong with this definition apart from the fact that this will cause offence to sluts and bastards? Why should we consider the feelings of sluts and bastards anyway? Are they really better than married mothers or the legitimate?

A promiscuous woman is the worst sort of woman to be (and she is also the worst sort of employee), because she breeds bastards.

Why is "bastard" a derogatory term?

Because the stupidity and the low standards of the mother will be passed on to her offspring. Not only that, the bastard will probably have had a deprived childhood and be deprived of the benign influence of a loving male parental figure and his family connections because of the stupidity and promiscuity of his or her mother.

Excuses and allowances will be made for him if one wishes to be compassionate, lowering standards of morality and education.

It is from Sluts and Bastards that the British developed their Culture of Excuses.

If no excuses and allowances are made then we will feel bad for being harsh and illiberal.

Now, we have got to the stage where even a party that is supposed to be promoting the interests of the white race dare not criticise these sluts, because most of their membership consists of sluts and bastards.

The BNP no longer dares to criticise these promiscuous women, who commit the foul sin that is the miscegenation of the unmarried, who are making the white race weaker, more stupid, more degenerate and more cowardly with every bastard born in Britain each minute of the day.

That is why British employers would rather gouge out their eyes than hire British employees, and that is why the government continues to let immigrant labour enter the country to replace the useless bastards of the sluts.

Damned if you are nice to sluts and bastards, and also damned if you are not.

Let us call a spade a spade, a slut a slut and a bastard a bastard, instead of calling them "one-parent families". Then we will know exactly what to do with them.

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

And their excuse is that they are too busy working until they are 67 to look after their elderly relations.

It is these feminists who thought it would be a good idea to give nurses degrees so they now think they are too good to wash bottoms and change bedpans and minister to the - yuck! - sick and dying.

It is the feminists who think mothers should work thus making British mothers crap and British children crap.

It is the feminists who refuse to criticise female promiscuity and who condone and encourage the existence of Slut Single Mums.

It is the feminists in the teaching profession who keep dumbing down standards to accommodate the unteachable bastards whose mothers' sluttery they dare not criticise.

Feminism is shitting and pissing on the heads of men, decent women, the elderly and the next generation of poor stupid bastards who will be fit for nothing but SLAVERY while the men of Britain dither like women, wring their hands and wonder what to do.

Speak up, you mice of Britain. You have nothing left to lose but your CHEESE. You will not have a pleasant old age, your childrens' futures are fucked, so you might as well tell it like you think it is.

Slut Single Mums are beyond criticism. (We know who is in power by whom we cannot criticise.)

Feminism, which promotes female promiscuity, is beyond criticism.

It has become advantageous for men to behave like women.

Male politicians are without exception unashamed of exhibiting the female characteristics of hypocrisy, prevarication and cowardice, believing them acceptable and even necessary for their survival, even as they prate on about democracy, free speech and liberty.

Use their family (by this they really mean their female partner) as an excuse for not doing the necessary thing.

Men privately agree with you about the evils of Slut Single Mummery and admit they are afraid.

Men who are supposed to be promoting the interests of the white race dare not criticise SSMs.

Free Love AKA Sexual Liberation has become a political orthodoxy AKA a Sacred Cow.

There are more bastards being born than legitimate babies, which means that most mothers in Britain are SLUTS who will turn their bastards into useless criminal BASTARD adults. (The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world, which means that in the West, the morals of the Slut Single Mum rule)

The government is stupid and the people are mad, and vice versa.

The Unholy Trinity of Welfarism, Slut Single Mummery and Free Love reigns supreme.

It doesn't matter that women are cowards because they will still be useful as bearers of children (for the enemy race who will spare their lives).

Indeed, it is in the interests of the race that women do not act recklessly in case they provoke violence which may lead to death.

For men, though, it is necessary for the survival of their race that they are not cowards. What the invader tends to do is kill the men and enslave the women and children. So it is in their own interests that they do not behave like women. Cowardice would suggest weakness leading to exploitation by their women or by an unscrupulous, corrupt and weak leader leading ultimately to exploitation by an external enemy.

These are the simple principles of group survival, but which will sound like rocket science even to the current and practising members of the BNP.

How SHAMEFUL that they need a female and foreigner to point this out.

How SHAMEFUL that even now they are still looking the other way and saying I am mad and pretending they don't know what I am on about.

How SHAMEFUL that even now they dare not criticise their Slut Single Mums, whom they know are ultimately stupider, weaker and more cowardly than they, who are making the white race weaker, more stupid, more degenerate and more cowardly with every bastard born in Britain each minute of the day ....

Do they even know why bastardy is considered a bad thing? Bet they don't know and are too scared and stupid to find out, those useless, shiftless, gutless witless cunts, or already know (because they are themselves illegitimate) ...

Maybe they just don't want to be expelled from their social club (there is no point calling it a political party any more).

But the men of Britain are too stupid to notice or too scared to say anything, having had their brains and balls and guts sucked out through the blow-jobs they keep getting from the sluts they love so much and dare not criticise.

Anyway, these gutless men (or shall we call them drones?) have female friends who are Slut Single Mums they are hoping to get a blow-job from, or whose mums are Slut Single Mums, whose female relations are Slut Single Mums and who probably knocked up a Slut Single Mum or two themselves. Why, they may even have grandchildren whose mothers are Slut Single Mums.

Or they are elderly men no longer up to much.

You can insult these witless, shiftless, gutless drones all you like. Nothing will happen because these fuckers actually feel no SHAME.

That is why it is hopeless. If only there were a collective gun to blow out the what might pass for the collective brains of this country. Their guts are all over the floor anyway, but for some reason they won't die ....

If these women want a C-section then they should be made to pay for it, or get their husbands pay for it, if they have one.

Or else you will soon have Slut Single Mums demanding C-sections to breed the next generation of sluts and bastards at the expense of the British taxpayer, who is usually male.

Too bad then that the typical British male is too stupid and scared to say anything now. Too busy at work or jerking himself off to Internet porn or screwing some slut in council accommodation who will become a Slut Single Mum demanding a C-section at the expense of other patients of the NHS, especially if they are male and elderly.

So Frank Zimmerman is going to be charged next month, and we have no idea what he said.

Bet he didn't say anything particularly scary.

Bet a man would not have gone to the police, but because she is a WOMAN ....

And this is why most women shouldn't be in politics. They just degrade the level of debate and silence their opponents by claiming they have been offended or frightened or upset by their detractors who must therefore be evil for upsetting them.

We should know now what Frank Zimmerman described as "an unemployed recluse" - said that made her shop him to the coppers. If it turns out that it is not in fact a credible threat, or a threat that any red blooded male in British politics (well, a hypothetical one anyway) would have dismissed and not lost sleep over.

But no, we have to wait a whole bloody month before we discover what an elderly man said that might have caused this female politician to go crying to the coppers.

The questions the court should consider are:

"Would a male politician of reasonable firmness have considered the communication a credible threat justifying the involvement of the police?"

"Was this female politician using her gender and her children to facilitate the punishment and intimidation of her detractor in a way that would not have been open to a male politician?"

"Should this woman be charged with wasting police time if the answer question 1 is NO and the answer to question 2 is YES?"

Strangely, she is now describing herself as a "single mother".

"As a single mother, it's a job I try not to delegate,"

she tweeted.

Has she already divorced the second husband she married in June? She seems to be going through husbands at the rate of knots.

"It seems a perfect example to me of 'black on black crime'. They are obviously drunk or on drugs. At least they didn't attack the women."

Why? The women are more likely to be slut single mums. The old man, even if his mother was as slut, was not responsible for his bastardy.

Did this woman think the mothers of the young man and his gang members who punched the old man for no reason were married when they were born?

Are there any white liberal women who want to cuddle these young black men who have had bad slutty mothers and slap them on the wrist after a compassionate heart to heart about the errors of their ways?

If these women get gang-raped by these young black men, should we feel sorry for them?

Maybe it would be less distressing to witness if these young black men only practised hunting liberals ie those who are soft on crime, sluts and bastards and the causes of crime, sluts and bastards.

Those who are soft on crime, sluts and bastards and the causes of crime, sluts and bastards tend tend to be white middle class liberal feminists ie women, who may be slut single mums themselves, or have daughters who are slut single mums, or who have female friends who are slut single mums.

Clearly, it was the reproductive choices of WOMEN and their bad mothering who created these young black thugs.

Should we even blame these young black thugs for behaving the way they do when most of their peers behave like that anyway?

Perhaps the white race are indeed to blame because it is white people's liberal feminist governments who refuse to get tough on this sort of behaviour nor the slut single mums and their bad mothering who produce the kind of young black men witnessed on the happy slapping video you just saw.

If you ask anyone in the liberal political establishment (and this includes the liberal media) if criminality is related to Slut Single Mums they will pretend they do not know what you are talking about and perhaps suggest you are mad and silly, when really they are probably thinking of the following:

female relations who are slut single mums

their female friends who are slut single mums

the mother of their illegitimate child (if they are male eg Ed Miliband and Justine Thornton now Mrs Miliband)

their mother or

even themselves (if they are female)

who fall under the category of being a Slut Single Mum ie a mother of a BASTARD.

Is it true then that WOMEN are to blame for most of the ills of this world?

Obviously, if they are not in charge, you cannot blame them, but they are in charge, and the attitude of this particular white middle class woman was quite clear - it was a mixture of racism and indifference to the victim because not only was he black, he was also a mere man.
And this is the reason why feminism must be challenged. The liberal media all know about me and who I am, and their policy is to IGNORE me, hoping that I will get tired and eventually go away.

Don't look to the BNP to challenge feminism because they are all stuffed with sluts and bastards too. They are also trying to court the female vote (have you seen their new love heart BNP logo?) so they won't be saying anything about

the MISCEGENATION OF THE UNMARRIED

the principles of racial health and hygiene ie their promiscuous women who make bad reproductive choices and who often have illegitimate and disabled offspring who grow up to become either welfare-dependant NEETs or criminals (whom British employers do not want as employees)

the female-dominated teaching profession that refuses to condemn slut single mummery

why white men would rather let their women remain sluts because otherwise they wouldn't be getting any "action" because no woman would want to marry a man with a lifetime of welfare dependency in front of and behind him or a McJob (unless she were a stupid slut gagging to pass on her genes )

In fact, the BNP even expelled me for saying that it is not a good idea for the white race for white women to copy the behaviour of Riven Vincent (who knew 13 years ago that she had Multiple Sclerosis and then went on to have her severely disabled daughter Celyn, who is blind, cannot lift her head nor move any of her limbs who cannot be criticised).

We know who are in charge by whom we cannot criticise, and we cannot criticise SLUT SINGLE MUMS or women who make bad reproductive choices and whose existence and their offspring are a burden on others who are not their husband.

Would you rather be afraid of an Evil Dictator or the Secret Police, or would you rather be known as being a citizen of a nation whose government and its dishonourable opposition are all afraid of Slut Single Mums, whose numbers are greater than the mothers of legitimate children?

Would you rather your nation be known as a nation of sluts and bastards?

If you are an effeminate man feminised by years of feminism you will probably have no principles and feel no shame, and have no idea what I am on about. In any case, you will be too busy jerking yourself off to Internet porn to be reading this.

And even if you did read this and understood what I am saying, you won't be doing anything about it, because the next thing you will do is find some Internet porn to jerk yourself off to, to take your mind off things, and then you will go to the pub to find some slut to fuck and give you a blow-job, which, fortunately for you, ain't too hard, because there are lots of stupid sluts around gagging to be the mother of your illegitimate children, which you won't have to pay for, because the taxpayer is made to pick up the tab ....

Friday, 18 November 2011

It would be a job creation scheme for slut single mums who will need a source of income after the welfare state is dismantled.

It would stop men from thinking there is such a thing as no-strings sex.

It would allow us to digest the idea that it is possible to be lower than a whore if you are a slut single mum. By this I mean a prostitute tells the punter the price in advance, while a slut pretends its free and then contacts the CSA when the illegitimate baby is born, and then the man will find himself paying for the child he never intended to have with a woman he would never dream of marrying.

It would discourage sluts from exploiting vulnerable men who cannot say NO to a woman who offers them what they think is no-strings sex.

Is it because most of these women are sluts or bastards (because their mothers are sluts)?

I bet there is a direct correlation to mental illness with sluttery and bastardy that is endemic in the West. It is so endemic that most people now think it is NORMAL to either be a slut or a bastard, and you can get expelled from a white nationalist party just for pointing out that sluttery and bastardy is not good for the white race.

" ... the social conditions faced by black Americans--poverty, racism, unemployment, female-headed households, illegitimacy, and the increasing divorce rate [fuelled by FEMINISM]--place blacks at high risk for 'mental disorder, crime and family and community breakdown.'

It is not a matter of being black or white, it is a matter of what you do.

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

The miscegenation of the unmarried should be a hot topic amongst nationalists, but I see no sign of this.

We all know why black people are mostly criminal. It is because black people are mostly illegitimate. Now that white people are mostly illegitimate, they have become like black people, as David Starkey says.

Rude though he is, he is not rude enough to criticise Slut Single Mums which really would be lese majeste.

We know who is in power by those we cannot criticise - the matriarchy who protects and encourages the Slut Single Mum, the woman who makes poor reproductive choices eg Riven Vincent and the Bad Mother eg Fiona McKeown who brought the disgraceful quality of British motherhood to international notice. (Why do the footmen of the matriarchy - men of the Left like Paul Lewis of The Guardian - refuse to see this and admit this? Probably because they have taken on the feminine characteristics of denial, prevarication, hypocrisy and cowardice because it profits them to behave more like women than like men. http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/11/orwell-prize-writing-riots-my-encounter.html)

Yet, even then, the degenerate British felt no shame about Fiona McKeown who had cast British motherhood in such a bad light, and only cast around to see whom they could blame for the easily preventable misfortune that befell her late sexually active under-aged daughter.

The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world and the hand that rocks the cradle of the illegitimate British baby is a SLUT SINGLE MUM. It is she who is responsible for the DEGENERACY of the White Race and, very soon the fall of Western civilisation.

Sadly, degenerate white men no longer have the courage to criticise their women and will expel anyone from their nationalist party anyone who criticises their Slut Single Mums (whom they have now in effect deified), especially if they have Disabled and Illegitimate Offspring.

Tragically for them, they have made a god of their appetites and now worship it slavishly.

While I hoped (but did not expect) that David Starkey would be on the WRITING THE RIOTS panel, I was disappointed that no reference at all was made about his comment that whites have become black, despite much talk about the racial disadvantage being suffered by blacks, especially by Nicolas Kent.

Aware that Paul Lewis is doing research into the causes of the riots, I wondered what he thought about the possibility of illegitimacy being the common factor. To this the arrogant young pup responded haughtily that the remark was so stupid it did not deserve an answer. (I might have taken it personally had I not heard him say exactly the same thing to a pretty young lady who was playing at being journalist with her mother, when she asked him a very good question: Should social media be closed down during riots if it is that which is facilitating in their rioting? To this the arrogant young pup said that the British cannot be like the, yuck, Arabs or any of those non-Western peoples who do sensible things to keep the forces of chaos at bay, or words to that effect.)

I asked Paul Lewis why it was stupid to suggest that illegitimacy was a factor as there was much evidence to suggest that illegitimacy was a factor, particularly as I remember politicians talking about telling parent(s) on the radio, during the riots, to give their children a call to see where they were, as well as blaming the riots on "bad parenting" and "absent fathers". Still the Arrogant Young Pup maintained that there was no evidence to suggest that this was so.

I asked if there were any statistics being compiled to link illegitimacy with rioting, and he said there was no evidence to suggest that.

I asked if there were any statistics being compiled to discover if there is such a link and was not given a proper answer.

I asked if not, why not, but did not receive a proper answer either, and was dismissed from his presence when he told me that we would have to agree to disagree.

Oh, it was because they are the ones with the shops to loot, she answered.

Why, I asked, was it that brown people were the ones with the shops while white and black people were the looters of those shops? Was she not concerned for her fellow-Muslims?

A white man died in Ealing, she said, and there were Asian rioters too. Nevertheless, there were fewer Asian rioters and more Asian men died as a result of the riots, but she would not accept this point, for some reason. (I had thought she would be concerned about her fellow Muslims having shops being looted and their sons killed in defence of their shops, but I could see no hint of this.)

I then mentioned David Starkey whom I thought seemed to have put his finger on it: black people are known to be mostly illegitimate and white people are these days mostly illegitimate too. There was the connection, surely, even if David Starkey did not himself specifically mention illegitimacy?

"David Starkey knows nothing!" she said, angrily.

"David Starkey knows nothing about anything except Tudors," she added, before walking off and ending the conversation.

I had better luck with Mary Riddell though, whom I felt just had a hint of integrity and journalistic standards despite my suspecting her to be a bit of a Lefty, and I warmed to her and liked her in spite of my suspicions. I think it was actually she whom the late Susan Crosland (whose funeral is blogged at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/03/susan-croslands-funeral-4-march-2010.html) said she did not wish to be interviewed by because she was feeling fragile after the death of Auberon Waugh and opted for an interviewer whom she felt would be gentler and perhaps less penetratingly sharp. (If I have got this wrong and am confusing her with another female journalist who asked to interview Susan but did not get to, no doubt Mary will correct me.)

At any rate, Mary admitted that she had forgotten about David Starkey's remarks and agreed that they should have been discussed. She too rushed off though - perhaps made uneasy by the subject - or really because she did have a dinner date. She was nicely dressed for it anyway, and I hope she enjoyed her evening.

I trust she will, if her time and her journalistic integrity permits, consider the correlation between illegitimacy feminism and the chaos that will end Western civilisation if Western governments in conspiracy with Liberal Feminist journalists of the Left continue to ignore, deny and suppress the evidence that tolerance of slut single mums that breed their variously fathered feral bastards at taxpayers' expense will destroy their nation.

Our politicians are afraid of offending Slut Single Mums because too many of them now have the vote.

Do liberals really want to be governed by a government afraid of Slut Single Mums?

Do liberal journalists really hate their own children so much they don't care if they grow up in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland and become unemployable welfare-dependent Paedos, Bastards and Sluts, and are known as such by other nations?

Oh, and don't anyone dare call me racist when writing about me or I will sue. You can call me "Slut Single Mum-ist" or Sluttophobe, if you like, but I don't think there is a law against this ... yet ....

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

This lifestyle became possible with the invention of the contraceptive pill, but women still have unwanted pregnancies and illegitimate children all over the place. This shows that women are not really that clever even with something apparently as fool-proof as the pill.

The pill entices them into extramarital sex with the promise of protection yet, through negligence, recklessness and incompetence, they continue getting knocked up, suffer from unwanted pregnancy something chronic and have their variously-fathered feral bastards all over the place the behaviour of whom bring the white race into disrepute.

I therefore propose withdrawing the pill from any woman who does not declare herself to be a prostitute. While regular tax assessments will be sent to her by HMRC, no further action will be taken even if she declares her earnings to be nil.

If she is really a working prostitute then of course she would be obliged to declare her earnings.

If she is merely a fornicatress she would enjoy the benefit of being regularly reminded that her fornication has not earned her anything.

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

Men (or should I say "Cubs"), if you are young and charming and patient enough, with coachman-like good looks and don't mind being treated as a servant, you can always shack up with a cougar AKA sugarmummy who will have fertility issues or who doesn't want children. After all, if you are low enough to do this, you don't deserve to breed or don't want to anyway.

This is about young men who are low enough to sleep with older women for their money, but who give up the chance of being a father of legitimate children and having a normal family life. These men are no better than male prostitutes, because we all know men really prefer to shag younger women but can shag older women if they are given the right financial incentive.

If all younger men became cubs, then the human race would die out, but I guess this would suit younger men with no self-respect who want to sleep their way into money rather than earn it themselves, who use environmental concerns to avoid having the responsibilities of taking a wife and being a father of legitimate children.

The cub will of course have the option of divorcing the cougar and moving on to a younger cougar. He may even get half her stuff and her house.

I have been told by aspiring "cubs" that older women are more interesting and sexually experienced. Perhaps this is only to be expected when women are protected by employment legislation that allows them to compete unfairly with men.

It is not about whether these cougars are still shaggable, but the morality and long term societal consequences of enticing younger men to shag women who are past child-bearing, when they could be working and maintaining families of their own with legitimate offspring.

Perhaps affluenza means a declining birth rate and is as inevitable as night following day, old age, arthritis, illness and death.

Perhaps there is nothing you can do with civilisations who are at this particular part of their cycle.

So, perhaps it will be the end of Western civilisation as we know it, when it will become Muslim civilisation in the West, because at least Islam tells Muslims to have legitimate children and to respect the institutions of marriage and family, to think about posterity and future generations, while cubs are thinking of which cougars to shack up with, in a childless but financially advantageous relationship.

Two interesting facts: When you hit 60 you are called a jaguar. Also, Khadija, the Prophet Muhammad's first wife, was a cougar and he a cub. The marriage was not however childless and she had four daughters by him.