Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
It was reversible error when Olson was denied 1) his statutory and constitutional right to present an affirmative defense through medical doctors that he lacked the capacity to comprehend the harmful nature or consequences of his conduct, or that he
unwittingly or unknowingly violated the law, or that his conduct was innocent or mistaken, or in the alternative, 2) his constitutional right to present a defense of lack of criminal responsibility due to insanity.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the matter should be dismissed as moot.
2. Whether the Defendant is entitled to a mental disease or defect defense on a strict liability offense, contrary to statute.