I am an evil giraffe. Who no longer blogs about politics.

Anyway, I take a detached view of the subject – I’m both monogamous, and happily married to a woman with sufficient self-respect to be disdainful of the idea of dehumanizing her body enough to make it into a domestic policy tool – but I do have one observation to make. You see, the last time I checked one common argument against promoting abstinence programs was that you cannot realistically expect young people to voluntarily and consistently refrain from having sex… and at this point some people reading this post are laughing, and some people are scratching their heads.

Either way, no need to go further down that line of thinking, yes?

Moe Lane

PS: We need to start teaching logic in high school… ach, well, let me not start on that particular rant.

9 Comments

Number of times I’m apparently going to have sex with these women during Access Denied week: zero. Number of times I’ve had sex with these women before Access Denied week: zero. Difference between the two numbers: zero. So, amount I care about this sex strike? Even Ron Roach can do THAT math.

So, let’s see if I have at least a meager grasp of this action: Liberal women are going on a Sex Strike. Is this against Men? REAL Men? Not likely. So These Liberal Women are going on strike against EACH OTHER?

What could they POSSIBLY hope to gain by this?

And for those Liberal Women who might be having sex with actual Men (as defined by a strict medical/anatomically correct definition of the word) how will their lives DURING the strike actually differ from the Before and After?