Friday, 31 August 2007

A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS TO ALL MEDIA OUTLETS STILL USING THE OUTDATED EXPRESSIONS "LEFT WING" AND "RIGHT WING" - IS STONING A WOMAN TO DEATH FOR BEING RAPED "LEFT WING" OR "RIGHT WING"? IS BEHEADING ANYONE FOR LEAVING ISLAM "LEFT WING" OR "RIGHT WING"?

SIOE is an umbrella organisation represented by people from various countries, various religions, various races and various political views. But we have one thing in common. We are peaceful and want to stop the islamisation of Europe.

We think racism is the lowest form of human stupidity, so therefore we don’t understand the media in Belgium calling our demonstration “right-wing”. We are neither right, middle or left wing. We only have one common goal: To stop the Islamisation of Europe.

Therefore racists and violent people or organisations are not welcome to join our demonstration. We have no connection with these kind of people, Stormfront, Blood and honour and if they come to destroy our march, our stewards will take care of them, or we will let the police take them out.

We will not let anyone, minority groups or single persons, whose desire is to glorify their own ego, spoil our march to stop the Islamisation, and if anyone tries to, we will hang them out to dry on our blogs afterwards.

The table of political oppression is a round one and the "left" and the "right" sit just one seat apart while gnawing the bones of freedom's carcase. Between them sits Islamism with an arm around each of their shoulders in a pretend friendly embrace, but all the time with a knife hidden up each sleeve ready to cut their throats.Never trust an Islamist.

We at SIOOz (Stop Islamisation of Oz) are concerned at the attempted Islamisation of Australia. Australia’s tolerance, freedom and laws are being misused in an effort to insinuate and make acceptable Islamic attitudes, practices and laws, contrary to our values and destructive of our open, western democracy.

Our Western democracy depends on freedom of speech to challenge dangerous ideologies such as Nazism and Islam but those critical of Islam are forbidden from speaking! Islam is a totalitarian political system, dressed up as a religion. Islam is racist, supremacist, intolerant, violent and sexist and practices gender and religious apartheid, subjugating all non-Muslims under appalling dhimmitude laws or slavery.

Political correctness, backed by religious vilification laws and fear of Islamic violence, protect Islam and prevent us from stating the truth about this ideology, which threatens our children’s and grandchildren’s freedom, equality and safety. Our media, politicians, educators and some religious leaders are complicit in pushing a rosy picture of Islam, hiding the appalling reality evident worldwide.

The pervasive penetration of Islam and the special favour and protection it receives is evidenced by separate lock-up Muslim toilets, prayer rooms and departments of Islamic Studies (controlled by Muslims) on most university campuses, separate Muslim swimming sessions in public pools, Muslim advisory boards (not to teach Muslims how to live in the west, but to tell us how to change to suit Islam!), hijabs (symbol of Islamic political power) pushed into schools. Our police, government, military, security and educational institutions have been infiltrated and corrupted, backed by huge government and overseas resources for promoting and privileging Islam. This must stop!

We are dedicated to stopping the Islamisation of Australia and have joined with a European group SIOE (Stop Islamisation of Europe). SIOE is staging a demo outside the EU Parliament on 11th September. SIOE is a pan-European movement determined not merely to stop the surreptitious Islamisation of Europe, but to reverse it.

Many Europeans are horrified at the Islamisation of Europe and the violence and threats that accompany it. The rally lets them voice their opposition to Islam, sharia and the destruction of European culture and asserts the right to say ‘enough’ to politicians who connive with Islamists to establish sharia by stealth.

BRUSSELS, Belgium:An appeals court has upheld the ban of an anti-Islam protest planned for Sept. 11 in Belgium's capital, six years after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.

The organizers — an alliance of Europeans opposed to the "Islamization" of Europe — failed to prove the ban causes them "irreparable damage," the Council of State, an administrative appeals court, ruled late Wednesday.

Brussels Mayor Freddy Thielemans banned the demonstration Aug. 9 fearing it would disturb public order and calling the Stop Islamization of Europe alliance an inflammatory group.

In a secular democracy "it cannot be that women and men are ... suspected of having committed the worst crimes" simply because they are Muslims, said Thielemans.

Since 2001, Thielemans has approved more than 3,500 demonstrations in the Belgian capital and banned six, including the one of SIOE which calls itself "an alliance of people across Europe with the single aim of preventing Islam becoming a dominant political force in Europe."

The group's origins lie in anti-Muslim organizations in Denmark, Britain and Germany. It called for the Brussels protest to commemorate the victims of 9/11.

A posting on the SIOE web site Thursday suggested the Sept. 11 protest will go ahead as planned.

"Well! Mayor Thielemans believes he has the final say!" it read. "Thousands of people believe otherwise."

Polish Members of the European Parliament are expressing concern about a pro-Palestinian conference that is to be staged in the European Parliament. In their opinion, this one-sided event could stir up anti-Israeli sentiments.

Joanna Najfeld reports

Polish euro-parliamentarians from all sides of the political spectrum have come together to oppose a controversial pro-Palestinian conference that is to take place in the European Parliament on the two last days of August.

The United Nations committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People is organizing a conference on the European Parliament premises and some MEPs are scheduled to speak at the event. The state of Israel is trying to block the conference, fearing that it might spread anti-Israeli sentiments in Europe.

In response to the touchy issue, Polish parliamentarians have voiced their concern. MEP Konrad Szymanski:

'It is not a question of opposition to the conference, we oppose the official patronage of the European Parliament. We think this conference sends a very unrepresentative and misleading message to our Middle East partners, because as far as we know, the conference organizers have a quite one-sided and biased agenda. This is why we think the public opinion should be aware that this is not representative of the European Parliament position which is clearly described in the official resolutions.'

Polish MEP Bogusław Sonik has written an official letter to the European Parliament President Hasn-Gert Poettering, but it is not just Polish parliamentarians who share the disapproval of the European Parliament President's decision to cooperate with the partisan conference organizer. Konrad Szymanski again:

'When the President of the European Parliament decided to do it, it was his free will and it was in his competence to do it. But we would like to voice the opinion, that this is not shared by the whole European Parliament. A lot of parliamentarians were shocked by the fact that this committee is an official partner of the European Parliament. We think that it is a mistake of the President of the European Parliament, Hans Gert-Poettering who decided to invite this committee to the Parliament. Two years ago, we had a similar situation, but Mr. Borrell refused to cooperate with this committee.'

The issue of pro-Islamic sentiments in Brussels has a wider angle, says European Union policy analyst Piotr Bonisławski:

'In 2005, upon hearing the news of the death of John Paul II, the socialist mayor of Brussels, Mr. Thielemans was quoted as saying "Champaign for everyone". Now the same controversial mayor of Brussels has banned the demonstration of the "Stop the Islamization of Europe" paneuropean organization that wanted to demonstrate against introducing the Sharia Law in Europe. According to the organization, the march would end in front of the European Parliament building with one minute of silence for the victims of September 11 terrorist attacks in America. But, according to the mayor, it would be racist and xenophobic to demonstrate on September 11 in Brussels against introducing Sharia Law in Europe.'

The controversial pro-Palestinian conference in the European Parliament will go ahead as planned, as is too late to prevent it from taking place. Polish parliamentarians hope, however, that the public opinion will notice that the views presented in the conference are not shared by all MEPs.

An appeals court has upheld the ban of an anti-Islam protest planned for Sept. 11 in Belgium's capital, six years after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.

The organizers - an alliance of Europeans opposed to the "Islamization" of Europe - failed to prove the ban causes them "irreparable damage," the Council of State, an administrative appeals court, ruled late Wednesday.

Brussels Mayor Freddy Thielemans banned the demonstration Aug. 9 fearing it would disturb public order and calling the Stop Islamization of Europe alliance an inflammatory group.

In a secular democracy "it cannot be that women and men are ... suspected of having committed the worst crimes" simply because they are Muslims, said Thielemans.

Since 2001, Thielemans has approved more than 3,500 demonstrations in the Belgian capital and banned six, including the one of SIOE which calls itself "an alliance of people across Europe with the single aim of preventing Islam becoming a dominant political force in Europe."

The group's origins lie in anti-Muslim organizations in Denmark, Britain and Germany. It called for the Brussels protest to commemorate the victims of 9/11.

A posting on the SIOE web site Thursday suggested the Sept. 11 protest will go ahead as planned.

"Well! Mayor Thielemans believes he has the final say!" it read. "Thousands of people believe otherwise."

Wednesday, 29 August 2007

Stephen Gash's address to SIOE supporters. Read by Anders Gravers on 25th August in Demark

Brussels Mayor Thielemans banned the Stop Islamisation Of Europe (SIOE) demonstration scheduled for 11th September because he said he feared a violent reaction from the "foreign" community. He reportedly said a similar SIOE demonstration in Britain led to violence. This is a complete falsehood as no SIOE demonstrations have taken place in Britain.

If "Kalifascist" Freddy (as he is now known by SIOE supporters) allows the Arab Europe League (AEL) demonstration to take place on 11th September (hurriedly arranged so as to negate SIOE's appeal against Mayor Thielemans's ban) then he will merely confirm our accusations of the hypocrisy and double standards with which our politicians plague European governance.

This would also show that violence and intimidation now prevail in Europe’s political capital whereas peaceful democracy fails. In other words the Islamisation of Europe is in control.

If Mayor Thielemans had shown any kind of leadership he would have allowed SIOE's demonstration to take place and then permitted the AEL event to happen on another day, or at a different time on 11th September.

We urge all the political parties in opposition to Thielemans's socialist "kalifate," within the Brussels council, to openly support SIOE in Stopping Islamisation Of Europe.

AEL describes SIOE as "extremist and racist". I would like to remind readers that SIOE's motto is"Racism is the lowest form of stupidity! Islamophobia is the height of common sense!"

I would also ask AEL if stoning a woman to death for being raped is normal or extreme behaviour? Under Sharia law women are literally dying to know.

There is a march coming up, a march towards the capital of Europe – Brussels. This march is a march for freedom - and on the way, we will obtain that freedom, take it from the central power of the European Union - that has stolen it from us.

SIOE declared a demonstration in the name of freedom of speech – this demonstration was a calling to the persons of power. A statement, stating the fact that the islamization of Europe has undermined the first freedom of a democratic state. Symbolically we were banned, we were told not to go to Brussels, because we were racists and islamophobes. This sounds a hollow – how can these stupid curse words ban the most precious freedom of all?

Because it is so, the politicians do not even have to put forward any real reasons for the foul conduct – they can just ban and tyrannize.

We have a living proof of the loss of our freedom, due to the corrupt and weak politicians of Brussels.

Now how long are we going to accept this? How long are we going to let our freedom be taken away? When is it time to put that line in the sand, say enough is enough, we will not accept anymore!

I say now, right now, to that occasion we have so successfully prepared, the march to Brussels at the 11th of September – supporting our American friends in their struggle against the radical islam.

Europe is at a crossing point right now, we know our politicians as old but incompetent leaders of a worn out and unusable democratic system – and we have choose whether to cross, or stay put – to fight ourselves for our democracy, or leave it to politicians.

Rousseau, the philosopher of the French revolution beaconed on us, with the simple truth of power: He said: Man is born free but everywhere he is in chains.The chains we have borne have been the chains of democracy and law – we have deposed our free will to the leaders of our society - trusting them with the task of upholding the security and freedom of every citizen of every country. By doing this, we have freed ourselves from the rule of the strongest.

Muslims have however reintroduced the rule of strongest into Europe again. The trust we have put in our democratically elected rulers, have hereby been breached. Our leaders were supposed to uphold the democratic law - and now they are bending over to the might of the strong muslim ummah. We have now neither the freedom of ourselves because we respect law - or the freedom of law, because roman law is not respected by the islamists.

According to Freddy Thielemans SIOE are racists, and islamophobic – basically SIOE represent evil in its most simple and horrendous form. But is it so? What is it really SIOE is trying to get through to politicians, and other people of power?

SIOE presents a fight for the very core of European civilization.

The two main elements in European state are: Democracy and Roman Law. Combined, these two ideas give us a system that is stable and well functioning - in short it gives us freedom, peace and prosperity. These two organizational cores of our states are now under pressure.

Democracy, Roman law and muslim law are described in detail by prominent philosophers as Socrates, Aquinas, Al-Ghazali – science in its most eloquent form. Therefore it seems a little weird to be called a racist and islamophobe, when all you really do is demonstrating against a system of civilization that is utterly foreign to you. A system that has always led to disintegration and absolutely no development in any sense – as you can see in the middle east countries.

Now SIOE is blamed by the Arab-European League to be insensitive of the Arabian culture – well, we do not have anything against Arabian poetry or dance, we do however have something against the law system of the middle east – especially when it is imposed on areas of European soil without the consent of the citizens, and often with a violent and very insensitive methods. Bombing things, raping and killing is exactly the sign of insensitivity – and we are worried by this development, because it shows lack of sensitivity towards Roman law – a law system based on public vote.

Freedom of speech, democracy and Roman law are all virtues of a state envied by people around the globe. And we want to keep them.

Now the march is important because that will be the first barricade Europeans have put up against the tyranny of the islamists. It will not be a fascist demonstration, it will be a march by a community of Europeans who put the freedom of democracy to their heart. It will be blacks, jews, gays, protestants, catholics, high and low wandering to Brussels to demonstrate - to fight for the first freedom, for human right to speak out on issues that concerns them – Freedom of speech. Hereby rebuffing the politicians - standing up: Democracy and Roman law.

Some decades ago, a tiny Indian, Mahatma Ghandi, wandered against the sea, to break the monopoly of salt trade – the salt march. Now it is time to make our salt march – and be proud and happy to be part of generation, with something to fight for. We may take a beating, but it is worth taking – because this is the defining moment of our generation.

Let us show to whole of Europe that there are some people who will NOT cease their freedom because they lack the courage to stand up to their country and culture – let us march.

This may start a ravine tearing on bit of ice with the other, growing, finding momentum – and in the end it will make a river of resistance blowing all the occupiers and tyrants of our freedom away. Giving us the Europe back that we have lost right now, the secure, peaceful, prosperous Europe, the Europe we will be able to hand over to our children with pride.

Let this be the calling of our generation to commence what the brave have always been fighting for: Freedom.

Brussels, the capital of Belgium, prides itself on being the capital of Europe and of the Atlantic Alliance. The city, where the European Union and NATO headquarters are located, has no fewer than three U.S. ambassadors: one to Belgium, one to the EU and one to NATO. Like Washington, Brussels hosts hundreds of protest demonstrations each year. During the past six years Freddy Thielemans, the mayor of Brussels, allowed 3,500 demonstrations. He banned only six, including, last year, a march of Kurdish nationalists belonging to a terrorist organization. As a rule everyone — except criminals — is allowed to demonstrate in Brussels.

Two weeks ago Mr. Thielemans issued his sixth ban. "Stop the Islamization of Europe" (SIOE), a pan-European organization led by a Dane, an Englishman and a German, was denied permission to demonstrate on September 11 against the introduction of Shariah law in Europe. Many European countries are introducing elements of Shariah law, such as granting welfare benefits to polygamous families, prohibiting private soup kitchens from distributing pork, banning Muhammad cartoons and organizing separate swimming hours for Muslim women in public pools.

SIOE planned to bring 20,000 to 50,000 participants to Brussels from 26 European countries. The march would end in front of the European Parliament building with one minute of silence for the victims of the September 11 terror attacks in America. According to the mayor, however, the latter is an indication of SIOE's criminal nature.

"I decided to forbid the September 11 demonstration," the mayor wrote, because "First and foremost the organizers have chosen the symbolic date of 9/11. The intention is obviously to confound the terrorist activities of Muslim extremists on the one hand and Islam as a religion and all Muslims on the other hand... Such incitement to discrimination and hatred, which we usually call racism and xenophobia, is forbidden by a considerable number of international treaties and is punished by our penal laws and by the European legislation. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly pronounced judgments condemning this type of acts."

Today, Dr. Ulfkotte Sioe’s representative met with lawyer Senator Hugo Coveliers, of the Raad van State (Council of State) the only Belgian institution that can annul Mayor Thieleman’s ban on the SIOE demonstration.

The meeting got underway at 12.00 today, Tuesday 28th August.

SIOE has appealed about Mayor Thielemans’s decision and has received help from Belgium’s most respected lawyer, Senator Hugo Covaliers, who has taken up the case in the Raad van State.

Senator Hugo Coveliers expects an 80% chance that the Raad van State will support SIOE and declare Thielemans’s prohibition illegal.

Not least, this is because the SIOE demonstration is absolutely non-violent and the Mayor was fearful of violence from illegal counter-demonstrators.

It is unreasonable to disallow European citizens to assemble in the EU’s capital for the purpose of demonstrating against EU initiatives, simply because counter demonstrators might be violent.

We will publish up-to-date news from Belgium on this page during the day.

Monday, 27 August 2007

The Right to Assembly By Daniel Schwammenthal Word Count: 1,109 Brussels

"I'm a free thinker," says Freddy Thielemans. Really? Many critics now doubt it after the socialist mayor of Brussels banned a demonstration under the slogan of "Stop the Islamization of Europe" (SIOE).

The rally was scheduled for Sept. 11, and the organizers from Germany, Britain and Denmark had planned to bring about 20,000 people from all over Europe to protest not just Islamist terrorism but what they call the "creeping" introduction of Shariah law in their societies. The march would have ended in front of the European Parliament with a minute of silence for the victims of the 2001 ...

Sunday, 26 August 2007

email the BBC at news@bbc.co.uk and say this kind of thing is exactly why you do not want Sharia law in Europe, Islamisation of Europe nor hypocritical politicians like Mayor Freddy Thielemans who use their own double standards to promote Islamist values over those of the majority population, or indeed over all non-Muslim sections or our societies.

Fight back now and change the media's attitude. Say you are going to Brussels on 11th September.

Saturday, 25 August 2007

The guy pulling at the victim's strides is giving a bit too much away as well.

In fact I think the local Mullah needs to make some serious investigations about all of the dudes crowding around the lashing bench. The upholding of Sharia law is paramount in Iran (and Brussels seemingly), and homsexuality is likely to demand some serious stoning.

As Mayor Freddy Thielemans banned the demo in Brussels protesting against the Sharia by stealth taking place in Europe, one might reasonably assume that he supports this kind of punishment for drinking.

Of course Kalifascist Freddy thinks that such punishment would not apply to socialist city mayors, like him, who toast with champagne, the death of a Pope. Think again Freddy! Yours will be the first wobbly arse to be whipped if Islamists actually do take control of Brussels. Nobody, even an Islamist, likes a quisling politician.

One day Freddy will wipe his fearful brow and say "thank goodness for SIOE and those people who showed up on 11th September shouting 'no Sharia here' "

I'm not worried about being sued for libelling the "man in black" by saying he's gay - he has his face covered with an executioner's burkha, so anybody can say what the hell they like about the tosser.

Friday, 24 August 2007

As we have experienced difficulty with Kalifascist Freddy Thielemans, the Brussels Mayor - perhaps we should show solidarity with American students and stage events in Europe.

During the week of October 22-26, 2007, the nation will be rocked by the biggest conservative campus protest ever – Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, a wake-up call for Americans on 200 university and college campuses.

The purpose of this protest is as simple as it is crucial: to confront the two Big Lies of the political left: that George Bush created the war on terror and that Global Warming is a greater danger to Americans than the terrorist threat. Nothing could be more politically incorrect than to point this out. But nothing could be more important for American students to hear. In the face of the greatest danger Americans have ever confronted, the academic left has mobilized to create sympathy for the enemy and to fight anyone who rallies Americans to defend themselves. According to the academic left, anyone who links Islamic radicalism to the war on terror is an "Islamophobe." According to the academic left, the Islamo-fascists hate us not because we are tolerant and free, but because we are "oppressors."

Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week is a national effort to oppose these lies and to rally American students to defend their country.

Thursday, 23 August 2007

in which the journal writes "Despite many warnings against this extreme right wave, it seems hard to stop the train, one that is leading to an "enlightened" Kristallnacht (the night on which the German parliament was put on fire, beginning the Holocaust)."

Then look at these images of the democratically elected Islamist parties Hezbollah and Hamas that receive economic aid from European taxpayers

Presumably, those who criticise SIOE wish to allow Sharia law into Europe. Perhaps such people inhabiting Western chattering classes think they will be able to pick and choose which parts of Sharia law suits them? Think again!

The article in the Brunei Times was penned by Eva Vergaelen in Brussels.

SIOE welcomes this article and welcomes any discussion about what it stands for. It is called democracy, a concept that seemingly escapes Mayor "Kalifascist" Freddy Thielemans.

This notion also apparently escapes Eva Vergaelen who has not yet contacted SIOE to my knowledge.

In her article Eva Vergaelen correctly scribes "According to SIOE, there are no moderate Muslims and Islamophobia is not a result of racism, but of "the height of common sense".

If "Kalifascist" Freddy Thielemans permits the Arabic Europe League (AEG) to demonstrate in Brussels on 11th September against Islamophobia and racism,

instead of SIOE's Stop Islamisation Of Europe, no doubt we will see many "moderate" Muslims on Brussels streets. Whether some of these will be people whom Mayor Thielemans feared would be violent against SIOE's supporters is now a rhetorical question.

In any case these "moderate Muslims" have not yet demonstrated against the many real (not imagined) Kristallnachts being perpetrated in Islamic countries on a daily basis.

Krystallnachts which see non-Muslims killed and displaced in their thousands every year in Islamic countries and which go unreported by holier-than-thou reporters like Eva Vergaelen.

Therefore, the logical conclusion is that "moderate Muslims" are perfectly happy to see infidels persecuted in the name of their relgion. As this is obviously the case, SIOE rightly identifies such people as being immoderate.

I notice the Brunei Times says Eva Vergaelen has "embraced" Islam. Yes: to embrace Islam means to have said: Ashadu ahn illa illahi hua Muhammad rasul Allah - I hereby testify that there is no other God than Allah - that is to"embrace" Islam...no wonder she opposes freedom of speech!

And finally, as if anyone with half a brain needs reminding, Islamism is not a race, it is a particularly nasty form of oppression.

Wednesday, 22 August 2007

SIOE believes that many who call themselves moderate Muslims are in fact closet apostates and are people desperate to leave Islam, but are too afraid to say so.

This is why we have seen no mass demonstrations against the Sept 11 World Trade Centre Islamist terrorist attacks, the July 7 Islamist terrorist London bombings nor the March 11 Islamist terrorist Madrid bombings.

Therefore, we conclude that "moderate muslims" either support the Islamist terrorists or are in fact apostates who are too afraid to declare they have rejected Islam (Irtidãd).

People leave Islam at an already phenomenally high rate, but SIOE reckons that more would do so, especially in the West, if they felt they were not alone.

Therefore, to encourage people wishing to leave Islam the:-

ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL ISLAM APOSTASY DAY IS THE SECOND FRIDAY IN OCTOBER!

In 2007 this is Friday October 12

Those wishing to leave Islam on the ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL ISLAM APOSTASY DAY should congregate in the central square of their state capital on Friday October 12 wearing a plait of green, yellow and blue ribbons for mutual identification.

Strength in numbers is the key. Be brave, be bold, be free!

Better coordination may be achieved by using forums on websites such as:-

Please keep all ativities legal. It is best to contact local police first. Be prepared for delaying tactics, however.

In England Islamists seem able to demonstrate at a moment's notice. SIOE doesn't know whether this is because Islamists receive more favourable treatment from the authorities than other people, or whether Islamists just show up at a venue and get away with it.

Just such a demo happened outside Westminster Roman Catholic Cathedral the day after Pope Benedict's observations on a Medievil text

Tuesday, 21 August 2007

An anonymous Biased BBC reader notes that people at the BBC have made somewhere in the region of 7,000 anonymous Wikipedia edits (i.e. not including those Beeboids who have their own Wikipedia accounts), including this BBC edit of George W. Bush's entry, changing his middle name from Walker to the Beeboid's own name. How amusing. Of course the real joke is that we telly-taxpayers are paying these morons to sit on their backsides and indulge in their petty personal political prejudices whenever they think they can get away with it.

Update: Lots more BBC Wikipedia edits have been uncovered by Biased BBC readers, (see the comments), including this one, where a BBC Wikipedia editor has changed 'terrorists' to 'freedom fighters'. What a surprise. Lots more Wikipedia edit-o-rama drama to come I'm sure!

Meanwhile, The Grauniad has picked up on this story too (from where they don't say - unlike Biased BBC they don't credit their sources) - but of course, they don't make any mention of their BBC bedfellows penchant for er, 'revising', Wikipedia!

Wednesday, 15 August 2007

Is anybody up for a Freedom of Speech demo outside the Belgian embassy in London?

I don't know about you, but I'm passed caring about seeking permission anymore.

Abiding by the law and obeying rules is seemingly pointless.

Whenever law abiding citizens ask for details about to whom they should apply for permission to hold a peaceful demonstration they are confronted with obfuscation and dilatory behaviour or an outright ban.

However certain sections of our community are able to descend on a particular spot and protest about others having the supposed freedom to question their religion, at a moment's notice.

Perhaps people should spontaneously saunter up to the Belgian embassy and voice their concerns.

Regarding your decision to ban the “Stop Islamisation Of Europe” demonstration on 11th September outside the European Parliament in Brussels, I would like to remind you that there are many communities, other than Muslims, who have settled in Europe.Many of these communities have chosen Europe for their home because of its tolerance, democracy and free speech.

Some of these have had to flee Islamic persecution.

Whatever the reason these people certainly do not wish to see Islamic culture, practices and doctrines being imposed upon them or placed above Western values, in other words they do not wish to see Sharia Law or Islamisation in any form taking hold in Europe. I am therefore, dismayed that you have unilaterally decided to ban the demonstration which has declared itself to be peaceful, non-racist and pro-democracy, merely to protect the sensitivities of, but one section, of the Brussels population, namely Muslims.

This goes against the principles of the European Union, which has its Parliament in the city where you are Mayor and in fact, reveals that you are yourself culpable in the Islamisation of Europe, the very reason why the demonstration was organised in the first place.

I would like to remind you that your duties and responsibilities encompass the needs and sensitivities of all the communities of Brussels and not just those you choose to side with.Your action exposes both your favouritism towards the Muslim community and double standards unworthy of your important office.

In a mature democracy I am astounded that you ban a demonstration because Muslims might become violent towards the demonstrators expressing their democratic rights.

It would have been far better if you had advised your Muslim constituents to either ignore the demonstration or better still to hold a peaceful counter demonstration on the 11th, or at some other time.

If you fear violence from your Muslim citizens you would be far better employed in educating them as to Western values the rest of us enjoy and uphold.Therefore, I urge you to reverse your decision and to allow the Stop Islamisation of Europe demonstration.

Tuesday, 14 August 2007

A demonstration planned for 11th September in Brussels and entitled “Stop Islamisation Of Europe” has been banned by the Brussels Mayor Freddy Thielemans.

The demonstration was intended to commemorate the victims of the 2001 terrorist attacks against the USA with a minute’s silence, on the 6th anniversary of those attacks.

It was also intended to show that it was Islamist terrorists who carried out that mass murder and nobody else.

SIOE considers that conspiracy theories blaming American and Israeli authorities for the atrocities actually dishonour the victims and their families.

The demonstration was also to protest against the growing Islamisation of Europe whereby Islamic practices and sensitivities are increasingly placed above those of non-Muslims.

In a meeting on 7th August with the Brussels police SIOE organisers, Anders Gravers, Stephen Gash and Udo Ulfkotte were informed that policing the demonstration would be no more difficult than for any other similar event.

However, on 9th August Mayor Thielemans (now known as Caliphate Freddy the Grand Mufti of Brussels) declared he banned the demonstration because he could not guarantee public safety.

The mayor's spokesman Nicolas Dassonville said: "The danger to public order is too high," to allow the Brussels protest to go ahead. The sizeable foreign community living in the area could react to the action.”

SIOE was started to combat exactly this kind of attitude expressed by our politicians.

The city of Brussels authorities receive between 500 and 600 requests to hold protests each year. In the last five years only six have been banned, said Dassonville.

The SIOE protest was remarkable in that the organisers had firm agreement from political parties, religious groups and others, that they would stand shoulder to shoulder, united against Islamisation of Europe and would forget any differences they had on other matters!

It would, therefore, have been a truly multi-ethnic, multi-cultural and diverse event, in the spirit of what the European Union purports to promote.

Monday, 13 August 2007

Paul is a regular contributor to anti-Islamist sites and his letter below sums up the feelings of many who have phoned or emailed SIOE----------------------------------------------------------------------------------It had to happen. It was just a matter of when. Writers on sites such as Gates of Vienna have spent years detailing the totalitarian impulses of the European Union and the associated apparatchiks riding on their coat tails.

And now it is out in the open. A peaceful democratic protest, organised by people with no trace of historically violent behaviour is banned because the Mayor of Brussels, a Mr Freddie Thielemans, believes he cannot guarantee the safety of the public, and perhaps more pertinently, does not wish to upset the delicate sensibilities of Brussels’s large resident Muslim community.

What a sense of relief! Those hours spent researching, reading and writing up on the European Union and it’s dastardly plans for it’s “community” of citizens were not in vain. No matter how right we may have thought we were, there was always that nagging doubt in the back of one’s mind that perhaps it was all too fantastical to be true; is it really possible that white Western European leaders (unelected, but surely that too could not be true, after all we live in a democracy do we not?) were intent on betraying and sacrificing their own people, all half a billion of them, in their pursuit of power and a seat at the never ending trough of financial swill?

But now the face of Europe’s totalitarian New Order has exposed itself in all of it’s slippery, devious, treacherous, lying, naked ambition. If they are prepared to deny free speech and freedom to demonstrate, then what else will they deny us? Could those scarcely believable tales, spun across the “right wing” web sites, making outrageous claims that the EU wanted to incorporate old Christian Europe into a new Islamic entity called Eurabia possibly be true?

And if that is the case, what of the threat of arrest by Europol, (whose headquarters is rather fittingly the ex-Gestapo headquarters) followed by transportation and trial before Eurojust, with both organisations taking precedence over and above the judicial and police departments of national countries. Can it really be the case that such an arrest can take place for mere criticism of an EU institution, a criticism subsequently identified as a criminal act of xenophobic hatred?

These must just be rumours; it is too Orwellian, too Big Brotherish to possibly be true. But these plans are already in the EU pipeline, waiting for the day to come, and come it will before the next two years are out, after which the EU will have total control of it’s subject peoples. No more elections, no more sovereignty, no nation states, no freedom, just an imminent minority status of jizyah paying Dhimmitude.

Will you be able to leave the EU? I doubt it. A gigantic experiment in “social justice” coupled with an ageing population will require an ever-increasing tax burden on its working population. If you think you will be able to jump ship and leg it to Australia then think again buddy boy; without the taxpayer the EU will implode. They need your tax euros’ and you ain’t going nowhere.

As is often the case in history, world-changing events spring from nowhere. If the mayor of Brussels had given his approval to the 11th September demonstration, it is likely that a few thousand would have turned up, waved a few flags and gone home again. The media would have ignored it and the EU would continue on its merry way to full totalitarian rule.

But now the gloves are off. By showing his totalitarian hand before the EU has total power, mayor Thielemans has allowed us a vision of our future, and that vision is of jackboots, flags, gulags, servitude, secret police, religious police, and “mental institutions” for those not toeing the political/religious line.

We may be unable to stop the EU doing anything it wishes to do in a couple of years time - the internet will be blocked, dissidents imprisoned and telephones tapped - but we can do something about it now.

And that something is to be in Brussels on Sep 11th. This may be your one and only chance to make an impression on our EU masters before they make your protest impossible.

By outlawing a democratic demonstration, mayor Thielemans has laid down a marker that will be studied closely by the Brussels politicians. He has slapped our face with his glove, issued a challenge, fired the FIRST shot in a new war. If you run away and hide after the opening salvo then we are finished as a people, a culture, a race and a civilisation.

Don’t let Thielemans and his EU cronies’ notch up a victory after just one act of aggression. Do your duty. Book that ticket for Brussels. In years to come we may well look back and note that 10th August 2007 saw the beginnings of resistance or the beginning of the end.

Sunday, 12 August 2007

The STOP ISLAMISATION OF EUROPE demonstration in Brussels on 11th September would have been the first of its kind in the world.

It would have brought together people from different races, religions, political parties and countries in a common purpose to STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF EUROPE.

All participants agreed to bury their differences on other matters and unite to STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF EUROPE!

This would have been a unique multicultural, multiethnic and diverse event, principles that the European Union allegedly espouses, but clearly Caliphate Freddy, the Grand Mufti of Brussels (the seat of the European Parliament), does not.

SIOE does not believe in “right wing” and “left wing” preferring to use the expressions “free” and “oppressive.”

History has shown that “left” and “right” oppress and that only democracy, imperfect as it is, allows freedom.

Freddy the "Fascist" has chosen to discriminate in favour of the few at the expense of the rest – a truly fascistic decision.

Naturally, SIOE is contesting Freddy Thielemans’s decision and Udo Ulfkotte is meeting with lawyers to have the legality of the STOP ISLAMISATION OF EUROPE demo assured.

Until that time SIOE cannot endorse anyone going to Brussels to demonstrate against the Islamisation of Europe.

SPONTANEOUS ACTIVITIES

Christians going to Brussels

It has been made clear that many thousands of Christians intend to go to Brussels on 11th September to tour the cathedral and churches of the city.

They will be singing the human rights song “We shall overcome” as they walk through the streets and religious buildings.

Tourists going to Brussels

Many thousands of tourists are going to Brussels on 11th September and visiting many sites such as the famous Grote Markt or Grand Place before moving on to other sites of interest, including Brussels boroughs where Muslims live. Curiously, we have been told that these tourists will also be singing “We shall overcome”.

The silent majority

Many thousands of people are SO angry at Mayor Freddy Freedomkiller’s decision to ban the STOP ISLAMISATION DEMO that they plan to walk the streets of Brussels in small groups on 11th September with blank white banners and placards. SIOE is informed that these are symbols used in Belgium to protest against the removal of free speech.

Again, (it must be collective subconscious) these protestors will be singing “We shall overcome”.

SIOE HAS NO CONTROL OVER WHAT INDIVIDUAL PERSONS DO, BUT UNLESS AND UNTIL THE LAWYERS OVERTURN MAYOR FREDDY THIELEMANS’S DECISION TO STOP THE DEMONSTRATION ENTITLED “STOP ISLAMISATION OF EUROPE,” SIOE HAS NO AUTHORITY TO ORGANISE ANY DEMONSTRATION IN BRUSSELS ON 11TH SEPTEMBER.

One spurious reason he gave was that he could not “guarantee public safety”.

Around 247 demonstrations happen in Brussels each year and Mayor Thielemans feels he is able to “guarantee public safety” for each of these.

So what is the difference with this demonstration Mayor Thielemans? What factor in the Stop ISLAMISATION Of Europe demo renders it so unsafe when compared to other demonstrations which happen on a regular basis?

It was suggested to SIOE that policing this particular demo would be no more difficult than any other event, so why does Mayor Thielemans consider that Stop ISLAMISATION Of Europe is any less safe?

Anybody have any ideas?

What is so dangerous about a protest about stopping Sharia by stealth and insiduous ISLAM that a DEMOCRATIC freedom must be curtailed?

Can anyone think why ISLAMISATION as the reason for a demo makes it anymore dangerous than, say “globalisation”?

A prominent rallying cry for the planned protest is (not was) “DEMOCRACY NOT THEOCRACY”

Obviously, Major Freddy Thielemans believes that protecting theocracy is the way forward for the European Union – or more accurately the European Caliphate.

Even more obviously, to “CALIPHATE FREDDY” at least, ONLY MUSLIMS MATTER !!!

What SIOE will not tolerate is any group, especially a political party, using the demo merely as a vehicle for its self-promotion.

ANY POLITICAL PARTY TRYING TO HIJACK THE DEMO OR USE IT FOR SELF-PUBLICITY WILL BE EXPOSED AND DERIDED BY SIOE AND SIOE WILL URGE PEOPLE NOT TO VOTE FOR THAT PARTY IN FUTURE ELECTIONS!!

We are extremely serious about this. After the demo SIOE will produce videos and articles on the web and will be merciless in exposing any organisation that has attempted to undermine the demo in any way.

Stopping Islamisation of Europe is far too important for it to be used for personal promotion.

There was a meeting between the SIOE organisers and the Brussels authorities.

The details of the 11th September Brussels demo “Stop Islamisation Of Europe” were decided and included

1 Times for the assembling of demonstrators and start of the demo2 Assembly point3 Route4 End of march speakers (subject to change)5 Delegates to the EU Parliament with petitions etc6 Official end of demo

Additional information to be provided included

a) Coach parksb) Toilet facilitiesc) Security and safetyd) Meeting up points for different groups for network buildinge) Any other matters

Agreed details were sent to the Brussels Mayor Freddy Thielemans who banned the demo.

Belgians must surely make up the largest number attending the rally - remember Utrecht! People turned out to protest against Islamisation, while the media turned a blind eye. Well remind the media that you have a voice!

Dutch people - remember Theo Van Gogh and use the free speech he died for!

So all those living in or close to Belgium simply must come to the Brussels demo - if you love your liberty!

We also want to see

PhillipinosThailandersAssyriansArmeniansCoptsBiafrans

And other nationalities persecuted by Islamists

SikhsHindusBuddhistsChristiansJewsZoroastrians

And other religions persecuted by Islamists from around the world.

So contact your blogs and spread the word

Bring your national flags with you!I have been told by some non-European groups that they will be flying the flag of the European country they now live in. That's fine! JUST BE THERE!

SIOE was founded to be a conduit for action against insidious Islamism and Sharia by stealth.

The only way to tackle Islamists and our quisling, Judas-like politicians, is by being brave and by being bold.

AS WE HAVE ALWAYS SAID, SIOE is not competing with any other anti-Islamism organisation.

However, we find it more than a tad irksome when KEYBOARD WARRIORS hiding behind KEYBOARD BURKHAS of pseudonyms keep trying to change the aims and rules for the Brussels demo. http://siad.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/aims-of-the-march-911/

Anti-Islamism blogs and websites are an invaluable source of information, but the time for ACTION is NOW!

SO, if you want a demo protesting about another aspect of Islamism (other than stopping it) then throw off your keyboard burkha, reveal your identity to the world and organise one - don’t just write and talk about it and try to change the efforts of those actually doing something.

When you do that, you will find that SIOE will not try to change the rules, but will be fully supportive of your efforts.

It's a complicated world out there, which is why we have kept the Brussels demo simple.

STOP ISLAMISATION OF EUROPE (SIOE) DEMONSTRATION 11th SEPTEMBER OUTSIDE THE EU PARLIAMENTSIOE saysRACISM IS THE LOWEST FORM OF STUPIDITYISLAMANNULMENT IS THE HEIGHT OF COMMON SENSEThe Swiss Group “Against the building of minarets” and the Stop Islamisation group FOMI Norway join the coordination of the Brussels demonstrationFOMI Norge (Forum against the Islamisation of Norway)We support the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (UDHR) of the United Nations and the Norwegian Constitution.We consider Islam as an ancient political programme for dividing the community into classes. The supreme class is the Muslim men with wide-ranging rights, then follows Muslim women with lower rights, then Jewish and Christian men, Jewish and Christian women with minor rights.At the bottom of the society are believers of other religions, atheists and the slaves of the Muslims with no rights at all.We will fight against such a classification of the community.We consider the religious part of Islam as a tool for introducing Islamic imperialistic politics just like the prophet Mohammad utilized it when he as a warlord conquered the Arab peninsula in 622-632 and killed thousands of innocent people.We remind people that 45 Muslim states have not signed upon UDHR, but have adopted their own “Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam” (CDHRI) confirming Islam’s Sharia law to be superior to UDHR.We will never give up our freedom! We will never give up our principles! We will never give up our condemnation of Islamic politics!Contact: (for organisers see bottom)FOMI Norway stopislamisering@hotmail.comThis is just a temporary email address while a new website is being constructed.Dr. Ulrich Schlüer (Switzerland SVP member and spokesperson for “Against the building of minarets”)The peoples of all countries in Europe have throughout hundreds of years of political struggle won fundamental rights of freedom, which are central in the constitutions of all countries in Europe. The rights of freedom are an unalterable part of every western democracy.Also in Europe Islamists are increasing their efforts to establish so-called “parallel societies”, where Islamic law shall rule, in contrary to the unalterable western right of freedom.In Switzerland - as the only country in Europe - there exists a possibility for the people to form the constitution in what is called a “people’s initiative”. A committee has now introduced a “people’s initiative”, which demands a prohibition against minarets. If 100.000 electors sign this initiative within 18 months, the Swiss people will have a vote on a minaret prohibition. The collection of signatures has taken place since May the first 2007. The Swiss Peoples Party (SVP), which is the largest party in Switzerland, has already formally decided to support the initiative.A minaret does not in it self have a religious content, but it is the symbol of the political demands for power, which will help the breakthrough of Islamic law in Europe.Islamic law denies personal inviolability. It denies equality between boys and girls in education. Islamic law will remove the basic equality before the law. Islamic law distinguishes between pure and impure - between privileged and outcasts. This is in fundamental contrast to democratically based constitutional rights in all of Europe.Because compromise between Islamic and western law is impossible the Swiss people’s initiative demands full recognition of the fundamental rights of freedom from all who have settled and from all who exercise authority in the country. The Swiss people’s initiative is a signal to everybody to maintain the western rights of freedom for the generations to come.Long live equality before the law.Long live democracy.Long live liberty (freedom).Contact:Dr. Ulrich SchlüerInitiativekomiteeGegen den Bau von MinarettenPostfach 238416 Flaach ZHTel. +41 52 301 3100info@schluer.chschluer@schluer.chhttp://www.schluer.ch/http://www.minarette.ch/

These are the rallying cries that people all over Europe are shouting far and wide to Islamists both within Europe and in other countries who seek to impose Sharia law upon European citizens.

It is not only to Muslims, who seek to expand Islam across the whole of Europe, that Europeans are saying “Enough” it is also to our politicians who connive with Islamists to establish Sharia law by stealth.

From building regulations to burial rights, the majority of Europe’s population is increasingly expected to adhere to Sharia law.

“Hate” laws now make it a crime to speak out against Islam even though it is just another totalitarian political system.

Our free speech, which has been gained over many centuries by defeating tyrannical regimes through many bloody wars, is now being removed solely to protect Muslims from being offended. Nobody has the right to not be offended.

SIOE is a Pan-European movement determined to not merely stopping the surreptitious Islamisation of Europe, but reversing it.

The first step in this reversal is a march comprising people, from many European countries, all demanding that all non-Islamic European nations remain non-Islamic and a halt to encroachment of Sharia law.

Anders Gravers (Founder of SIOE Denmark and leader of the political party SIAD) said: “We do not believe in the concept of ‘moderate Muslims’. The evidence points to Islam being the opposite of moderate. The heart of Sunni Islam is Saudi Arabia and the centre of Shia Islam is Iran. No rational person can describe these two countries as ‘moderate’; at least not when compared to European values. We now have children in Danish schools being forced to eat Halal meat so that Muslim pupils are not offended. What next? Are Danish women to be stoned to death for being raped as they are in Iran? Or are people to be beheaded for leaving Islam as they are in Saudi Arabia? No! We will not allow Europe to become a huge Saudi Arabia or Iran”

Dr. Udo Ulfkotte (Founder and president of the non-profit charity "Pax Europa") said: "We clearly feel the pressure of Islamisation in Germany. German police and courts are more tolerant to Muslims than to non-Muslims. One of the highest German courts (Bundesgerichtshof) has just downgraded the punishment for Islamists who publicly declare and ask for violent Jihad in Europe. Unacceptably, some judges have quoted the Quran and not German law in court cases. Polygamy, once illegal in Germany, is now permitted only for Muslim men, who may even claim state benefits for their wives.

German life is changing to appease Muslims. For example, Christian crosses in our public institutions are being removed and there are separate swimming times for Muslims in supposedly public pools (which non-Muslims’ taxes pay for).

German Muslims demand a quota for "positive reports" from the German media, but they kick out the religious group Bahai from an inter-religious conference because they refuse to accept them within the "dialogue".

All this was once described as hypocrisy, but is now actually promoted by our feeble politicians.

Stephen Gash (Founder of SIOE England) said: “Appeasement of Islamists has become ridiculous. Non-Muslims are expected to be buried facing Mecca and to sit on toilets facing away from Mecca because cemeteries and new homes have to conform to Muslim sensitivities. Toy pigs are banned from offices and Christmas lights must now be called ‘Winter Festival lights’ so as not to offend Muslims. None of these oppressive measures were even contemplated when Jews were the only ones who could possibly be offended by pigs and ‘Merry Christmas’.Absurdly, to criticise Islam results in accusations of ‘racism’. Well, I’ve always considered racism as being the lowest form of human stupidity, but Islamophobia to be the height of common sense.”

Charlotte Westergaard (SIAD board member) said: “The biggest danger comes from our own politicians who promote Islamic values at the expense of our own values. The way things are going all European non-Muslim citizens will be paying the Jizzya tax to Muslims as they did during the days of the Ottoman Empire. Of course the politicians believe they will be exempt – until the local Imam knocks on their door.”