At first glance, I thought it same technology as LittleRP/DropLit, the hype was just marketing, nothing new. Indeed, it is A LOT of marketing

BUT, also, the "only" new idea I can see, is using what they call "liquid oxygen window", instead of the "glass window". Simplifying, what I understand is that they created a oxygen layer in the bottom of the vat, permeable. So, it is possible to cure the resin on top of that oxygen+liquid resin layer, without having the cured resin stuck in the vat. Hence, they eliminate the need of up and down Z axis move. Did I get it right? see the picture below.

The consensus from those who've looked at the patents appears to be the novelty is using the relatively new PTFE AF 2400 sheet tensioned as what hobbyists call a stretch vat. This alleviates the need to break the surface seal so you can print continuously. That's the bulk of the speed win, the rest is in resin formulation.

Note the current cost of PTFE AF2400 from Dupont is $1800 per 25g, so not a very hobbyist friendly material to experiment with.

The PTFE allows air to permeate into the lower levels of the resin and you end up with a tiny <20 micron layer where the resin will not solidify.The patent also suggests using pressure to force the gas through the membrane and increase the depth of this layer.

Polygonhell wrote:The consensus from those who've looked at the patents appears to be the novelty is using the relatively new PTFE AF 2400 sheet tensioned as what hobbyists call a stretch vat. This alleviates the need to break the surface seal so you can print continuously. That's the bulk of the speed win, the rest is in resin formulation.

Note the current cost of PTFE AF2400 from Dupont is $1800 per 25g, so not a very hobbyist friendly material to experiment with.

The PTFE allows air to permeate into the lower levels of the resin and you end up with a tiny <20 micron layer where the resin will not solidify.The patent also suggests using pressure to force the gas through the membrane and increase the depth of this layer.

Well ... at a such price tag, I think I prefer my prints to take more time (hour vs minutes, they say); While I wait for the prints to finish, with the money saved and time to spare, I can do a lot of things, for instance, build a new droplit or a rostock