Reflections of a multidimensional sunbaked servant of the Most High. Powered by Loveforce. Emitting Soulforce.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Self-determination- a long and hard road

Last Wednesday, a day before the United Nations Committee of 24 met in Nadi, to discuss - among other issues - the reinscription of
Maohi Nui (French Polynesia) on the list of territories for decolonisation, the
Pacific Conference of Churches again called on regional governments to
support the decolonisation of West Papua, Guam and Rapa Nui. The theme of this regional seminar of the Committee of
24 is regional seminar is to accelerate action on the implementation of the 3rd
International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism. The Pacific is
represented on the C24 by Fiji and Papua New Guinea.

"We recognise that this might be a difficult
position for some governments to take but the Pacific people must betreated
with justice," said PCC Desk Officer Peter Emberson.

The PCC statement read:

For the freedom of our brothers
and sisters in Guam, Kanaky/New Caledonia, Maohi Nui/French Polynesia, Tokelau,
West Papua to chart their own political future, we call on our Pacific peoples
in all walks of life to stand up, speak out and be actively be engaged in their
struggle.The right of peoples in non-self-governing-territories,
whose countries are ruled by colonial administrations, to determine their own
political future is enshrined in international law. Similarly, the duty of the
colonisers or Administering Powers to prepare the indigenous peoples in these
territories to exercise their right to self-determination is also mandated by
international law…Underpinning the legal instruments and administrative
protocols established to ensure and safeguard freedom is a grave moral
responsibility. Lest we forget, many of us who now live and have our being in
independent Pacific countries were once, not too long ago, also governed under
colonial rule. Our freedom was purchased by the commitment, very often the
sacrifice, of entire generations of our forebears and at great cost.

The support of the struggle for the self-determination of
Maohi-Nui, Kanaky, Guam, Tokelau and Tanah Papua is on the PCC member churches’
radar, following the 2013 PCC General Assembly in Honiara, Solomon Islands. In
Fiji the Executive Committee of the Fiji Council of Churches last year resolved
to support the churches and
people of West Papua in their struggle for self-determination.

"We continue to receive reports of torture,
violence and atrocities against the people of West Papua and these actions by
Indonesia must stop," said Emberson at a media conference where the
statement from PCC was issued.

I have shared the story of
West or Tanah Papua before – its colonisation by the Dutch, a brief moment of
independence in 1961, the invasion by Indonesia and the United Nations two
grave sins – allowing the transfer of control of West Papua to Indonesia in
1962, albeit with an agreement of future self-determination; and endorsing the
manipulated plebiscite “Act of Free Choice” in 1969, where, “instead of
overseeing a free and fair election, the UN stood by while Indonesia rigged the
vote.

Declaring that the Papuans were too "primitive" to cope with
democracy, the Indonesian military hand-picked just 1,026 'representative'
Papuans, out of a population of one million, who were then bribed them, and
threatened to kill them and their families if they voted the wrong way. So
strong was the intimidation that despite widespread opposition to Indonesian
rule, all 1,026 voted to remain a part of Indonesia.”

With the advent of the
International Parliamentarians for West Papua (IPWP) and the International
Lawyers for West Papua (ILWP) politicians and lawyers are beginning to engage
with the issue. Through the PCC, churches in the Pacific and by extension their
members will also begin to learn and engage with the case of West/Tanah Papua
and other self-determination struggles.

The issue of Tanah or West Papua weighed heavily on
my soul in my recent visit to Indonesia. I was profoundly affected by the
stories, which I had heard from West Papuans, and videos and pictures of human
rights abuses by Indonesian forces based in Tanah Papua, which I had seen
online. The response I received from a member of one particular Indonesian NGO
when asked about Papua was that it was very large and rural, so working there
was difficult. I was concerned by inferences that the challenge was because the
people of Tanah Papua and indeed much of eastern Indonesia, including Sulawesi,
West Kalimantan and Maluku are “primitive”.

“Bhinneka Tunggal
Ika”, those are the Old Javanese words written on the foot of the Garuda
Pancasila, Republic of Indonesia’s national symbol, which mean “Unity in
Diversity.” However, this is not necessarily the case. I was to learn that there is a level of prejudice towards
eastern Indonesia as it is also the least developed part of the country, thus
people native to that area are viewed as primitive. Ironically it is eastern
Indonesia which provides much of the natural resources for Indonesia’s economic
growth, while the western part receives the profits and development. A 2001
report by Minority Rights Group International, states that the extreme
development gap between the island of Java and most of the outer regions, the
effect of the government’s policy of

transmigrasi or forced
migration, and its political manipulation of religion have been strategies by
the powerful to their commercial interests in these areas, even if has meant
prolonging conflicts.

Self-determination for
West/Tanah Papua in this wider context is therefore not just political
empowerment but also socio-economic empowerment. As I spoke with other
Indonesian NGOs, community workers and activists who were more aware of this
context and great divide between west and east, I became more aware of the
preconditions for self-determination in West/Tanah Papua. The lack of access to
quality education – most children only attend school until they are 10 years
old, according to one source, health-care and infrastructure adds to the
already documented human rights abuses by the Indonesian military. It is a
stark illustration of the MRGI report, quoted above. By keeping the people of
West/Tanah Papua poor and disempowered, unable to become a cohesive movement
for self-determination due to poor communications technology and vast
distances, the status quo remains and the people of West/Tanah Papua will
always be at a disadvantage should any negotiations eventuate.

So how can the playing field
be levelled? Donor agencies need to channel funds to education, healthcare and
infrastructure development. Churches need to not only resound the call for
self-determination but get involved through education, health-care and
communications mission work. These were an important part of our growth towards
our own self-determination.

We must also challenge our
leaders, as constituents on a national level, or within our faith communities
and social groups to step up to the challenge of advocating for
self-determination in its fullest sense to be embraced. After-all, if we were
in the same situation, would we want any less?