«Jake, to adjust the walkpath (to avoid the letterbox) scrub along the timeline, and when the actor is half-way along the path you can shift click then drag him. You'll see the walkpath change. You can do this as many times as you like to get him walking around obstructions.I found the story a little confusing - did the guy get shot because he was having an affair with the other guy's wife? Some more closeups of the characters in order that we can tell them apart would be useful.With a title of "Prison Love", I was half-expecting the After Dark pack to have been put to use! LOL! Anyway, my advice to you is look for the positives in the feedback and work on that.»

«unfortunately i have to echo the comments others have left. im sure you can put a better movie together than this jake. as mac said, some of the stuff left in here really should have been dealt with in editing. interesting to see how you follow up from here. sorry to put a downer on it!»

I'm sorry Jake, I'd usually try to give positive or constructive feedback in my review but in all honesty this film has no redeeming features. It may sound harsh but you clearly put very little time and effort into producing this film. It's probably the most sloppily produced film I've seen on TMU, and that's no exaggeration. Now I never give a film less than 3 stars, but for such lack of care and effort in a project, I feel I have to make an exception. The only reason this isn't getting 1 star is because the camerawork did show everything it needed to show and the scenes went together to produce a film that had a story.

I seriously think you should be ashamed of this Jake. It's clear you put very little care or effort into this and it doesn't come off well. I hate to sound harsh but in my opinion this film deserved a harsh review, in the hope you might try a little harder next time.

Also, there are so many technical problems, for a 2 minute film it's kinda shocking. He seems to go out of his way to walk THROUGH the letterbox on his way home, and the animations were extremely robotic once he got in the house and was kissing his wife. I didn't get the fact that he hugged here, then stepped back, then forward again before he kissed her. Why not do it all in the same movement?

And then came the big blunder, which turned out as more comedy than anything else. You had the policeman walk into the house, turn back towards the door, turn towards the prisoner and his wife again, then back to the door again, then very slowly back towards the prisoner and his wife! I don't have a clue how you managed to do it, and am even more amazed that you left it in! It's such an obvious mistake...

And then after that, the policeman gets his gun out and shoots the guy! What the hell? He was unprovoked, the prisoner didn't try to attack him... why did the policeman feel the need to shoot him? »

Ok Jake... I'm sitting here now wondering just how much work you put into this, because the results are suggesting not a lot. This movie was strewn with signs of downright laziness and to be quite honest I don't even know why you uploaded the film in the state it's in.

Firstly, the music, which was the very first thing I noticed. Little Drummer Boy? Not just the fact that it was that song, but the fact that it was the karaoke version Monk sent you for the Christmas karaoke with the show hosts. So you didn't even bother to search for suitable music, but instead found this on your hard drive and placed it in, it's only purpose seemingly to cover up for the fact you did almost no sound design whatsoever. Like I said, laziness is written all over this.