"Obama's
black supremacist church is not off-limits, and every conservative site
you draw arguments from handily uncovers its anti-American creed."

I draw arguments from my brain. Yes, sometimes I remove it and hold my breath so people like you can keep pace.

MSN, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and other media outlets, during news reports not opinion shows, demonized a Romney super pac for suggesting ads involving reverend Wright. They have aired hosts attacking the idea that someone would mention Wright. "That's old news," they shriek.

The fact is most major news outlets constantly harp on the "racism" involved in calling out Obama on Wright. They haven't run breathless exposes on Obama's relationship with domestic terrorists. The same reporters going back to the 1800's for dirt on Romney tell people a month ago is old news as far as Obama is concerned.

Fact is, the most popular cable news network is Fox, so I see plenty of mud-slinging in both directions. And I regularly read magazines that do more than their job in exposing the dark side of Obama's past associations with domestic militants; there's no shortage of research weaponry on the Right, as it should be. Further, the most popular radio news shows, like Rush, are doing their part for the upcoming campaign.

What imbalance are you talking about? What conservative blog, anchor, commentator, or critic is actually following the "rule" about not going into Obama's prior background?

I'm sorry if MSNBC or the LA Times bother you, but you shouldn't be watching such horse manure in the first place. You stoop to the level of liberals, now you stink up the whole joint. Thanks for that.