Kuwait is taking homeland security to new heights — or, as some see it — new lows.

Later this year, the Persian Gulf nation will require its citizens, temporary residents and tourists to submit DNA samples to a $400 million security database.

Kuwait’s National Assembly passed the law in July, a month after an ISIS suicide bomber killed 27 people and injured 227 in the country’s capital.
“We are prepared to approve anything needed to boost security measures in the country,” Jamal al-Omar, a parliament member, told Agence France-Presse.

The government will collect saliva and blood samples from anyone living there. Tourists will have to submit their own samples before entering the country.

Disobeying the law will cost you. Those who refuse to provide samples can face up to a year in jail and a $33,000 fine; falsifying DNA samples will result in seven years behind bars.

While the Kuwait’s department of criminal evidence insists that the database won’t affect personal freedoms, the law has sparked outrage. Some travelers tweeted that they won’t be returning to the country anytime soon. [Source]

Visitors to Kuwait will also have to provide DNA samples to the government. When arriving by plane, visitors will stop at a center at Kuwait International Airport to have their DNA sample taken. Bruce Schneier, a prominent American privacy and cybersecurity specialist, says that the collection will likely be a standard cheek swab.

For citizens, the Kuwaiti government will have mobile centers to collect samples. Anyone faking the DNA samples faces up to a maximum seven years in prison.

Apr 21, 2016

Related Posts

95 comments, add your own...

It won’t happen. Even if all the MPs approve it doesn’t make it legal. We are not living in some jungle. Western embassies will be the first to oppose its citizens to comply, then it will be followed by international media and communities lobbying against it. I wouldn’t trust 1st world countries in having my DNA sample, so imagine Kuwait!!!

already the big crimes unprosecuted and the little crimes get punished. the classic case of a raped maid you runs away from an abusive home but is forced by law to return to the abuse. Rapists get off scot free in this culture. Do you think NO ONE will be tempted to tamper with DNA in this corrupt system where a good chunk of the babies born out of wedlock will have a Kuwaiti father?

With DNA and wastha – as usual everyone but the kuwaiti will be fucked. We’ll get blamed for shit that we had nothing to do with.

It’s extremely private and invasive, but luckily for you there are people who understand the importance of it and will be fighting the battle to keep it private for your benefit even though you don’t understand it.

Imagine a rookie or messed up government official uses your DNA as evidence?! Imagine a breach in the facility? Who will control what? Do u trust governments in General, so imagine an Arab state in hold of such thing….thats a recipe for a disaster.

Well the main thing I can think of is parentage. Like having 2 people with mismatched DNA who are supposed to be related then making that knowledge public to shame them. Another one could be falsified evidence since now they have everyone’s DNA on record and now suddenly your dna was rubbed off a swab and discovered on some crime scene.

Are you serious?? You’re comparing finger prints with DNA?? Also, this country is already mismanaged, chaotic, and operating on a very primitive system. So you want them to take your DNA and store it God knows where, and then potentially have it in the hands of some douche bag that can use it against you?? Wake up man.

Since you guys seem unable to do your own research, here you go courtesy of google. I suggest reading the pages in their entirety to make sure you get the sections on why and how it could potentially be misused (which has a higher likelihood of happening here seeing as we tend to mismanage even the country’s main and only source of income).

Please let’s not have the discussion along the lines of ‘If you haven’t done anything, you have nothing to worry about’. You do have something to worry about. Privacy is a very hot button issue. So if you don’t understand why people are up in arms try Googling Snowden.

The law will be enforced exclusively on Kuwaitis. The government is issuing a more secure passport for the citizens and they claim that need the DNA info to store it on the passport chip. This will – hopefully – allow the EU to drop the Schengen visa requirement for Kuwaitis and makes it easier to travel through electronic entry gates. I have not heard anything about this law being applied on non-Kuwaitis, residents or tourists.

Ridiculous as expected! Just shows the glaring non-coordination between different entities, and ad-hoc rule creation.

Who is the “advisor” to the Govt here for such stupid laws? Don’t they do a fact-checking or comparison to best practices in other countries? That’s what you should be doing if you have an incompetent lawmaking team – learn from others who have done it successfully.

It’s disrespectful when you’re a foreign worker in someone else’s country, yet have the nerve to bash the government and locals. That’s basic decency especially in the Arab world, we have a saying about this “ياغريب كون اديب”

How about u talk to us about the crap laws being passed on ur side of the world? Like banning acohol which is a PRIME income to the Bahrain economy, we all know Kuwaitis and Saudis go to Bahrain (5alna sakteen a7san 3an al balawi al thaniyah). So habibi keep ur nose out of other country’s business.

Guys,this is from the NY Post, one of the most unreliable sources of information in the world. This will NEVER pass or be implemented in a million years. It was probably a proposal by one guy in parliament or on a talk show, and got picked up by one of the news wires and the rest is history…..

What privacy are you talking about, this is done for security measures. You should be more worried about your emails and photos online that co’s have access to ! Not ur DNA, it’s pathetic that you’re worried.

Once again, what a stupid, invasive, and impractical law to put in place. This is an extreme breach of privacy, and has several severe consequences if put in place. Collecting everyone’s information and storing it digitally in one place is never a good idea; especially at a time when the Panama Papers leak and San Bernardino shooter issue have shown us the downfall, or importance, of cyber security.

To help explain, let’s look at two scenarios that could occur if this law were to be enacted. Let’s say there two individuals: Al and John. John has been digging up dirt on the government/powerful company’s shady dealings and he needs to be “dealt with” before the people really see what’s going on. Al is a criminal, whose DNA was recently identified at a crime scene. Because they have both these individual’s DNA on record, the government could theoretically swap the names on the two DNA records, making it seem John’s DNA was the one found at the crime scene, and frame him for that crime and take him to jail – effectively “shutting him up”.

Now let’s assume the government is less sinister, and does not use the information in this way.. very possible as well. DNA records can show lineage and ancestry information of each individual. Now say an extremist group has an agenda against people with a certain background and believe they shouldn’t even be alive, or that they need to “pay” for something that happened thousands of years ago. The extremists manage to hack the system giving them the information of every person currently in the country. With that information they can go around killing these people, because they’ll have their names, addresses, phone numbers… pretty much everything they need to track them down.

Obviously these are extreme examples, but everything in between is also possible. When thinking about a law like this all possibilities need to be evaluated because these examples will seem “unlikely” until they happen, and that’ll be too late.

The US and UK have a similar programs in place used to aid forensic science; however, the DNA records they have are of convicted criminals, suspects, and volunteers – which makes sense, as volunteers can do what they want, and criminals forfeit their civil liberties once they break the law. To put it into perspective, the US has a population of about 300 million people, and only 15 million people have registered DNA records – just 5% of all the people there!

There’s a reason Kuwait is the first country to put forth a law like this, and it’s because the law doesn’t make sense! The government needs to stop treating everyone here like criminals. If this does in fact go through, we’re one step away from having cameras and microphones installed in all houses under the guise of “security”.

Oh certainly! Actually they have enough data and scientific reasoning that the CIA and Secretary of State in the US are holding a world congress in Kuwait trying to acquire the learning and take it be to North America and the Europe. Kuwait is starting a global phenomena and who knows, maybe instead of aiming to become a food capital they could become the word geneticists security capital! :) Seriously!

The bottom has fallen out of Brent crude and it won’t be rising anytime soon. Isn’t
this truly bordering on a foolish extravagance, far more than even the megalomaniac designs of Dubai and Abu Dhabi?
Oil at $100 or even $80 a barrel makes sense to have but not like this.

I don’t agree at all with this law being implemented (both for residents and tourists), but I have a feeling that it will never be, as this seems to me to be a typical governmental spur-of-the-moment thing and they will revoke/forget it in a matter of weeks.

They said the database would cost $400 million and I don’t know if that includes other costs like collecting it. Doesn’t seem like something they just forget about. Unless because it costs too much then great.

As a foreign worker I already have to submit to a medical which includes a blood test and x-ray to get a work visa here. They take my fingerprints every time I leave the country. What difference does it make if they also take my DNA?

I haven’t seen any credible explanations yet, just people spouting knee jerk reactions and going on about their right to privacy and worrying about some mythical agency using their DNA against them like we are characters in a movie.

Get with the real world. Most countries have security services that can access your emails, mobile phones and basically track your location and know everything they want to know about you. If someone really wanted to cause you problems there are a lot of other sources of information already on-line that could be used against you much more effectively than your DNA.

Even without the database you could be framed for a crime by putting your DNA at the crime scene. It won’t make any difference either way.

Privacy! Anyone who uses a smart phone, especially any cloud services, gave up their right to privacy a long time ago. Your DNA should be the least of your worries.

If taking a cheek swab is an invasion of privacy.. Why isnt everyone complaining about the security cameras in every street in London? Its okay for the british government to make sure their country is safe by tracking you every where you go, but not the Kuwaiti government? Thats as much as a security measure as the DNA testing. If Kuwait did the same thing and had security cameras in every corner, everyone would jump and cry about their “privacy”. Its sad how there are always people ready to complain whenever something that will only benefit the society is being introduced. حلال على الاجانب، حرام علينا! This DNA collection idea will help solve crimes, determine inheritence (a problem Kuwait has in the past due to forging names or children born to another father), help discover people who got their citizenship illegaly or have 2 (Mojdawajeen)

How is taking a cheek swab any different than taking your blood type info or fingerprints?

I personally believe if you have nothing to hide, theres nothing to worry about.

National security is more important than anyones fear of having their lineage or whatever they want hidden revealed.

Why worry about the minority that will be safe and unprosecuted without the DNA collection, and think about how this will benefit and protect millions.

Mark instead of insulting the man for having an opinion, explain why you think it will be an invasion of privacy. You proceed to call everyone who disagrees with you as naive, but you don’t actually provide valid points. So why do you think its an invasion of privacy?

Hey I didn’t insult anyone, I was just stating a fact. If a guy has blue eyes I’m not gonna say he has brown eyes. The guy is naive because he’s uninformed and I told him that. I didn’t call anyone naive because they disagreed with me or because they had a different opinion.

Then just because you don’t read the comments doesn’t mean that I haven’t been providing valid points. This is the third time I post about this subject, check the previous two posts if you want my view in case what me and the other readers here have written isn’t enough. Then if you don’t believe us you could always use google.

But better yet, just ask yourself, if capturing and storing everyone’s DNA is not a big deal, then why are human rights organizations and the west making a big deal out of this?

Mark, you should understand that taking DNA could benefit the public in ways you don’t understand. And if you believe no good could come from it, that means one of two things, 1- you have facts prove your point. Or it just means you believe the Kuwaiti gov will cause harm because “كلمن يرة الناس أب عين طبعة”. One cannot speak of invasion of privacy without having basic freedoms, and one of those freedoms is freedom of expression, by disagreeing with this women you have proved you don’t respect other people basic right and opinions. Once you learn how to respect other, you should think of educating yourself in this matter. And FYI, if the scary government was out of get you, wouldn’t they already have gotten your fingerprints all over a crime scene? Next time do us all a favor and educate yourself on this topic or just understand there are two sides to every argument.

You’re wrong though, when you disagree with someone it doesn’t mean you’re encroaching on their freedom to express. I’m not stopping anyone from expressing themselves and I also have the right to disagree with people.

Storage of DNA is not an invasion of privacy because if it was, then what stops you from submitting your fingerprints for the visa.. The world has a database of you with your passport and your fingerprints along with it. In the end, its for identifying the perpetraitor and bringing him/her to justice. Nothing to do with privacy mate

this would be such a huge mess. “they” can barely handle routine govt. processes on a daily basis. can you imagine when they have hundreds/thousands/millions of samples to take/process/store/organize. dna processing is not like on CSI tv shows, it takes time and precision, both things that we are not good at. they would be so far behind on processing samples that it will be broken before it has a chance to work.

and dna does contain a lot of private information that could be misused if someone wanted to.

Handling of tourist samples is fraught with uncertainties since contam of DNA samples is always a worry and unless KWI international moves to a Chek Lap Kok its own there is no use pursuing it in the chabra market of an airport it currently operates from.
Peace

If it weren’t considered an invasion of privacy, most governments wouldn’t require a warrant to obtain it. Then again, most countries have freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly etc etc. Just another day in Kuwait. I do concede, however, that they can enact whatever bizarre legislation they want.

I am not going to give my opinion on wether I agree with this or not since I am not a citizen. If I don’t like it I can always leave. That said, I believe that countries like the US, UK and Russia will more than likely let Kuwait be the guinea pig for this and then follow suit after words. While the US does not have an “official” dna database it would not be to surprising if they have an unofficial one. During the Watergate scandal it was found that Nixon was recording citizens illegally. Still, i think that in the end the Kuwaiti MPs will fight the DNA database once people start losing their citizenship due to what some of the DNA results will show.

the problem here isn’t about is it right or wrong.. as i am kuwaiti i dont trust the government, they can play with it according to their need as they do with citizenship lately..

most of people here doesn’t understand whats DNA and what they can do with it and what information can get from it.
if they approve this law.. i am sure we will hear many divorce and maybe even killing cases soon.

In my opinion I think this is international politics seeping its way into our country. As someone else put it in the comments above, Kuwait will be a guinea pig in this matter.

Due to human error, a lot of mistakes can happen at a DNA database. So if the database is used for security/criminal reasons, false matches are inevitable due to the sheer size of the proposed database. This would be problematic in the case of incomplete DNA evidence at a crime scene and false matches between people, especially relatives. No to mention human “error” in the lab and at court.

What is also worrying, is that samples will be stored. Misuse of smaples is a huge issue, considering Kuwait’s geopolitical location and the threats that face the country.

According to the law that has pssed in this regard, they will be using International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). Why don’t they apply ISO to our current ministries’ structure, observe the results and then consider this 400 million dollar investment?

“The best way to take control over a people and control them utterly is to take a little of their freedom at a time, to erode their rights by a thousand tiny and almost imperceptible reductions. In this way the people will not see those rights and freedoms being removed until past the point at which those changes can be reversed.” by Unknown