Singing accurately
So that the notes mount straight up out of the well of
Dim noon and rival the tiny, sparkling yellow flowers
Growing around the brink of the quarry, encapsulizes
The different weights of the things . ..

The poems title authorizes us to surmise that the "sparking yellow
flowers" are syringa, which is a form of saxifrage. As its name suggests, saxifrage
is a flower that breaks rocks, which it does here at the brink of the quarry. But
Orpheuss lament breaks rocks, too; and the connection invests the lament with a
sense of fecundity. The flower breaks rocks with its beauty, affirming life on a desolate
terrain, which is the traditional burden of elegiac song. When song rivals the flowers, it
turns the "fissure" of quarry into a generative source, "the well of dim
noon." The poem presses the point by another play on "syringa," which is
derived from "syrinx," the Greek word for panpipe. True, the meditative voice
may make this generous acknowledgment of the power of song only in order to get beyond it,
to say that "it isnt enough / To just go on singing." But that voice says
so, precisely, as it does go on singing, making a poem, "Syringa," that is named
for the rock-breaking flower and prompted by loss.

From Lawrence Kramer, "Syringa: John Ashbery and Elliott Carter"
in David Lehman, ed. Beyond Amazement: New Essays on John Ashbery (Ithaca: Cornell
U P, 1980), 262-263.

James McCorkle (1989)

Poets and critics share in the necessity of invention. Ashberys artes poeticae
[Latin: "poetics" in the sense of a poets concept of how poems are made]
are emblems of invention and reinvention of the poet and poetry. In "Syringa,"
Ashbery explicitly invokes the myth of Orpheus, particularly the aspect focusing on
renewal or re-membering after fragmentation or dismemberment. The poems title points
to still another emblem of poetry, the reed, or what Syrinx was transformed into so as to
escape being raped by Pan. The narrative of Syrinx is displaced by the story of Orpheus
 her story is alluded to only at the end of the poem. Ashbery, thus, suggests there
are two modes of poetry. On the one hand there is the Orphic whose

music passes, emblematic
Of life and how you cannot isolate a note of it
And say it is good or bad.
You must
Wait till its over.

Ashbery, however, regards Orpheus with some approbation, depicting him as a comic-book
figure in the opening lines and questioning the culture that allows the elitism and
self-serving endeavors of the artist who acknowledges that "Stellification / Is for
the few." On the other hand, there is the music of Syrinx, of whom only a name
remains  the signature of both the poet and her new fragmented and dispersed poems
that leave only these "hidden syllables" of her name. Or does Syrinx represent
the demand that art transcend its artifice, to move from something loved to life itself?
To invoke that utter tyransformation, as Syrinx did before Pan could seize her,

Is to become the tossing reeds of that slow,
Powerful stream, the trailing grasses
Playfully tugged at, but to participate in the action
No more than this.

Though these grasses appear now as passive elements in nature, as David Bromwich notes,
they are all that is left of an apocalyptic encounter. Ashbery locates a pastoral idyll on
each side of the catastrophe. Syrinx, but for her name, has disappeared. This
moment of transformation is what the poet must write toward. Disappearing with the rise of
the Apollonian mind and Orphic natural histories, Syrinxs music represents the
juncture of the sacred, violent metamorphosis, and of violence forestalled by invocation.

From James McCorkle, "John Ashberys Artes Poeticae of Self and
Text" (Chapter 2) in The Still Performance: Writing, Self and Interconnection in
Five Postmodern American Poets (Charlottesville: U Virginia P, 1989), 81-82.

Donald Revell (1991)

"Syringa" sends an Orpheus entirely its own into "the nature of things
to seen only once, / As they happen along, bumping into other things." This Orpheus
proves most adaptable, shifting and changing his songs to extol and then to exhaust many
measures of art, nature, love, and time. And in the end, he is not torn apart; rather, he
is simply used up, burned out like a star, and the poem continues to its finish without
its Orpheus and yet with something of the beauty of his example, his fatal trajectory.
Orpheus "is no longer ? Material for a poem," and so the poem finds other
material. The reckless economy of poetry teaches that "stellification / Is for the
few," that out of many figures, only a handful resonate with enough life in enough
time to set us the kind of example, that is, an exemplary self, in search of which we
originally resort to the writing and reading of poems. In order to find these, the
imagination tries and squanders a great deal, living carelessly off its only capital: the
real and real time. Th compact measures of bad poetry are niggardly; they refuse to waste
words and try to pass off such parsimony as a virtue. Ashbery has taught me that I must
waste words, lots of them, trying them against and upon one another, allowing them and
their syntaxes to fall apart sometimes in order to find, not the true ones, but the ones
that seem true at the time, the ones whose example I am willing to follow to their
ultimately silent ends. The wasting and the falling apart are the circumstances, the
medium of poetry.