Notice that it is showing such "triggers"
as stance.Sitting, stance.Standing?

Testing these triggers some times has no effect in peer review
but in some scenes it can make the avatar stretch crazily out of frame
or suddenly your avatar is tipped sideways under the floor of the scene
or shaking...

Some people may think the pose is broken.

Varsha, this comment needs to be directly answered.

I agree this needs to be addressed. Non content creators will not understand these basic standing or sitting nodes and try to activate them. This will cause mass confusion when the avatar suddenly morphs into an odd pose.

We are planning more improvements to the Peer Review process in the upcoming weeks. Stay tuned for details!

Scrap it and replace with something worthwhile?

This!

Honestly, I don't see how this is a great improvement. UFI content was passed by choice in most cases, and you know this because the stuff was bought. Only your careful voters will take real advantage of this, and the way PR has been working, shows that many don't care. When you have ToS following products constantly getting fail votes for false reasons and UFI passing with no fails at all . . . I think that speaks loudly of the PR voters. And it happened all the time, and for a long time, that it made it appear imvu did nothing about those false voters. Sure you had that moment of people being banned from voting, but it didn't stop UFI, did it?

Now this new PR system of 'random' products going directly to CS and taking 24 hours to pass . . . is this taking products out of the hands of voters and into imvu's? Is imvu finally taking some responsibility of what's going in the catalog? And with CS allowing UFI content in the catalog under loophole reasoning, it's still a failed system.