Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider
registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Here’s more important fundamental changes happening right now. Nassim Haramein’s paper on the The Schwartzschild Proton has just been approved and published in the American Institute of Physics magazine a few days ago! This means his radically different physics theories are now entering mainstream science. This marks the end of Quantum Physics and Classical Physics. We’re now entering a new realm of physics that contains it all with the Unified Field Theory.

Nassim Haramein’s paper on the The Schwartzschild Proton has just been approved and published in the American Institute of Physics magazine a few days ago!

Not true. The AIP (American Institute of Physics) has a press. If you are having a conference, you can staple together all of the conference talks and the AIP will print it. This is not the "AIP magazine" (that's called Physics Today), it is not a scientific journal, it is not peer-reviewed. It's just the proceedings from a conference.

Not true. The AIP (American Institute of Physics) has a press. If you are having a conference, you can staple together all of the conference talks and the AIP will print it. This is not the "AIP magazine" (that's called Physics Today), it is not a scientific journal, it is not peer-reviewed. It's just the proceedings from a conference.

Looking over the AIP site the word networking hub I think would better identify it's purpose. Looking at the magazine Physics Today the articles look sound. I searched for Nassim Haramein within the magazine no results. He does appear on the home site under this *link . However, I'm unable to find the article on that page. But like Ben said they will list your conferences etc. without stated or implied endorsement. AIP also lists a number of other publications none of which have even the slightest whiff of woo about them. Thanks Ben for the help.

Not true. The AIP (American Institute of Physics) has a press. If you are having a conference, you can staple together all of the conference talks and the AIP will print it. This is not the "AIP magazine" (that's called Physics Today), it is not a scientific journal, it is not peer-reviewed. It's just the proceedings from a conference.

My guess at what's going on: it looks like there's some subfield of computer science/dynamical systems modeling, that ostensibly runs this conference. For some reason this subfield also attracts sort of woo "deep thoughts about the emergent nature of consciousness, whoa, dude" people who are happy to venture into the pseudo-relativity and pseudo-quantum speculations. However, I think that one or two of the conference organizers are outright physics crackpots in their spare time, and I think that they sent the call-for-papers email out to the European crackpot community. This results in such papers as the following:

Purcell is a philosopher; I don't know whether her work is credible in a literary-theory context, but it sounds completely nuts from where I stand. She's also a member of the Telesio Galilei academy (the one that's given its annual award to, among others: Wal Thornhill, Reg Cahill, Florentin Smarandache, Myon Evans, and Wladimir Guglinski)

Quote:

Scientific Consensus
Otto van Nieuwenhuijze (The Netherlands)

From his web page http://sites.google.com/site/ottovan...nhuijze/papers, "What we need is a Science of Life, integrating Body, Mind, Souls & Spirit; thesep papers describe how this works. The papers all are expression of the underlying 4D D logic, in which Space-Time_Energy-Consciousness are all united."

"My interest in relativity theory originates from my work in cognitive science, which calls for a fundamental integration of space and time. I expected to find a philosophical basis for my arguments in special relativity, but was rather disappointed by the way Einstein’s theory is being taught and interpreted. However, I developed an alternative interpretation that much better supports my ideas on space and time."

Quote:

Generalised Relativistic Hamiltonian in an Alpha Field
Branko Novakovic (Croatia)

From someone who has never published a physics paper. An author of the same name has several robotics/cybernetics publications.

Quote:

How Many Dimensions are Required in Physics?
Dieter Gernert (Germany)

Entanglement in Living Systems
Dieter Gernert (Germany)

Has written five articles complaining about Occam's Razor and peer review; two of these articles are published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration (alongside articles including "Scalar Wave Effects according to Tesla and Far Range Transponder, "Proposed Criteria for the Necessary Conditions for Shamanic Journeying Imagery", and "Thematic Analysis of Research Mediums’ Experiences of Discarnate Communcation", to give you the flavor)

Breakthrough in the Newtonian Gravitation with a Schwarzschild Potential: Fast Incursive Simulations of the Mercury Planet, the Emergence of a Black Hole and Naked Singularities
Daniel M. Dubois (Belgium)

Dubois edits the CASYS proceedings, and appears to have no physics background whatsoever.

Yarman: yet another telesio-galilei member! These authors have a long, long list of unpublished preprints in the "physics" archive. The first one I clicked on was following up on the work of Tom Van Flandern.

Quote:

Particles of High Bessel Order: a new Candidate to Dark Matter Problem
Gilles Nibart (France)

Author: on the board of Noetic Press, co-organizer of this conference. No identifiable physics publications.

This is great stuff http://www.padrak.com/ine/ELEWIS3.html . "Tornadoes and ball lightning are identified, and described as plasmoid phenomena. Certain anomalous characteristics of tornadoes and ball lightning are described and shown to be similar to the behavior of the plasmoid phenomena produced by electrolysis and discharge apparatus; in part, as evidenced by certain kinds of micrometer sized traces in nuclear emulsions and marks in materials.

I suspect that all phenomena is plasmoid phenomena, and that galaxies, atoms, and particles are plasmoids. Plasmoids seem to be basically an electrical-magnetic phenomena. In other articles(1,2), I've described plasmoids and plasmoid behavior extensively, and shown that plasmoids are responsible for the excess energy and transmutation effects observed in various kinds of "cold fusion" apparatus."