I’m done pretending that this is science, or that the “data” presented here is scientifically valid. If this were an undergraduate science experiment, I’d give the kids an F, and have them see me. There’s no valid information contained here, just the assumption of success, the reliance on supplied data, and ballpark estimates that appear to be supplied “from the manufacturer.”

This is not a valid way to do science at all. And this is certainly not even close to meeting the criteria required for extraordinary evidence to back up such an extraordinary claim.

Sounds like a product in which the Department of Energy should invest.Follow up investments behind Solandra, et al.And just because the assumptions are faulty, the data rigged, irrelevant or just downright false doesn't mean its not a great idea what for social justice, equality and the like. Might even make a good addition to the EBT card program and like the initial justification for Obama-Phones, it'll create jobs, much like Cash for Clunkers and Fast and Furious.So let's not go way off the deep end and demand some form of logical overly justified, rational, proven, tested treatment for the disease, we as a society are vastly more comfortable with the application of multitudes of band-aids to symptoms.

Forward.

E-Cat forever.An E-Cat in every pot E-Cats for the Children If it saves just one E-Cat it's Hunkie Dorey by me!E-Cats all around

Hey, If we can make money from nothing at all, not even paper, don't tell me we can't get energy for free too. How long is it going to take for you to catch on to modern trends anyway? The really, really smart people will figure everything out for us. We just need to go back to the TV and relax.

Members of tea party claim the movement springs from and promotes basic American conservative principles such as limited government and fiscal responsibility.

But new research by University of Washington political scientist Christopher Parker argues that the tea party ideology owes more to the paranoid politics associated with the John Birch Society — and even the infamous Ku Klux Klan — than to traditional American conservatism.

“Tea party conservatives believe in some conservative principles, to be sure, but they are different from more mainstream conservatives in at least one important respect,” Parker said. “True conservatives aren’t paranoid; tea party conservatives are.”

Asked flat-out if they think President Obama is “destroying the country,” only 6 percent of non-tea party conservatives agreed, a number that rose to 36 percent among all conservatives regardless of tea party affiliations. By contrast, 71 percent of self-identified tea party supporters thought this extreme statement true.

... Parker called the tea party a continuation of what political scientist Richard Hofstadter in the 1960s described as “the paranoid style in American politics,” characterized by exaggeration, suspicion and conspiratorial fantasy.

"down from record highs." top calling is as bad as calling the bottom. a correction would be healthy...but only insofar as entry points are being created for more buying. if you've been short (and nothing more) this thing you died a LONG time ago. that includes "the worst recovery in post World War II history" amazingly enough which to date we are now 5 years into. hm. "long tea party activists too." obviously i didn't see the SIGNIFCANCE of the "Japan thing" and blew off the SIGNIFICANCE of the whole "Korean guy who called the G-line" vis a vis the Fed "winding down their free money for banks program." or at least not giving them so much. or whatever it is. hmmm. contagion? "chickens coming home to roost."? we shall see...