Friday, September 10, 2010

9/11 Liar of the Day: Barack Obama

On the eve of the 9/11 anniversary, what does the president do to reinforce the lies? He has a press conference to repeat the lies ad nauseam.

This is not really news. It is what Obama always says and just documents the continuing cover up and evidence of treason from the highest office in the land. Anyone who lies about 9/11 also must be assumed to be lying about everything else.

From the 9/10/10 press conference Q & A:

Anne Kornblut.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. Nine years after the September 11th attacks, why do you think it is that we are now seeing such an increase in suspicion and outright resentment of Islam, especially given that it has been one of your priorities to increase — to improve relations with the Muslim world?

One of the things that I most admired about President Bush was after 9/11, him being crystal-clear about the fact that we were not at war with Islam. We were at war with terrorists and murderers who had perverted Islam, had stolen its banner to carry out their outrageous acts.

Helene Cooper.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. Two questions. One on Afghanistan. How can you lecture Hamid Karzai about corruption when so many of these corrupt people are on the U.S. payroll?

THE PRESIDENT: Okay. On Afghanistan, we are in the midst of a very difficult but very important project. I just want to remind people why we’re there — the day before September 11th. We’re there because that was the place where al Qaeda launched an attack that killed 3,000 Americans. And we want to make sure that we dismantle al Qaeda, and that Afghanistan is never again used as a base for attacks against Americans and the American homeland.

Ed Henry.

Q Mr. President, you were talking about some of the al Qaeda leaders that you have captured. One that you have not is Osama bin Laden. Tomorrow is going to be nine years since he was the mastermind of 3,000 Americans being killed. And what you said — obviously, the last administration had seven years and couldn’t do it. But what you said as President-elect to CBS is, “I think capturing or killing bin Laden is a critical aspect of stamping out al Qaeda. He is not just a symbol. He is also the operational leader of an organization planning attacks against the U.S.”

Do you still believe it’s a critical part of your policy to capture or kill him? And do you think — isn’t it a failure of your administration that here it’s almost two years in — you campaigned saying you were going to run a smarter war on terror than the Bush administration. You haven’t captured him and you don’t seem to know where he is.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, Ed, I think capturing or killing bin Laden and Zawahiri would be extremely important to our national security. It doesn’t solve all our problems, but it remains a high priority of this administration.

One of the things that we’ve been successful at over the last two years is to ramp up the pressure on al Qaeda and their key leaders. And as a consequence, they have been holed up in ways that have made it harder for them to operate. And part of what’s happened is bin Laden has gone deep underground. Even Zawahiri, who is more often out there, has been much more cautious.

But we have the best minds, the best intelligence officers, the best special forces, who are thinking about this day and night. And they will continue to think about it day and night as long as I’m President.

Was the American public lied into every major war except for Iraq and Afghanistan? Were the same type UBC, Prescott Bush, war corporation, and intelligence type thugs pre-Hitler up to the same crap then, as they were now? Check my link, others have already connected the dots quite well.

Interesting picture at beginning of this post. If one measures from the right side of the building, the collapsing portion (presumably from above) actually extends outwards from the building a distance (apparently) almost equal to the width of the building.

Do you see how the building is "flowering" out as the "collapse" has been initiated? Doesn't take an expert to reason that there is some force acting in outward direction from the center of the building. the ONLY force that would direct its energy outward would have to be an explosion.

I could understand the "flowering" effect towards the base of the building during a collapse.

The evidence is staring us all right in the eye. There should never be any doubt in anyone's mind about the lies and cover-up by the USA Government.

A picture is worth a thousand words. Take a long look at the picture. Imagine that you accept the gov theory, and the building collapsed due to stressed steel girders. Does that picture show a collapse? Wouldn't a collapse be, more or less, inward folding...especially towards the top?

I have no doubt in my mind and have no allegiance to the leaders of this country.

We cannot allow this to become another JFK. We must demand answers. We must demand investigation. We must demand that all evidence be publicly available. And we must demand that due punishment be served for any treasonous activity upon this country.

How Dare I - Collected Essays On The Destructive Force Of Judaism

Les Visible - The Curious Tale of Ash and The Whine: A Novel of the Unnatural and Supernatural

Follow by Email

Subscribe To

Search This Blog

Translate

Just in case there is a misunderstanding - Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. in our efforts to identify humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.