Forget the four horsemen

VCs need to stop blaming their IPO woes on the decade-old loss of four banks. Instead, they should look in the mirror.

FORTUNE — Ask most venture capitalists about the recent dearth of tech IPOs, and they’re liable to talk despairingly about the “Four Horsemen” — a quartet of boutique investment banks that underwrite a large number of such offerings both before and during the dotcom boom.

“No one has really stepped up to replace the Four Horsemen and we’re all suffering for it,” a veteran venture capitalist said to me this week. “It’s a fundamental problem that persists through both bull markets and bear markets.”

Unfortunately, it’s also a delusion.

The problem today isn’t that there aren’t enough banks willing to take smaller tech companies public. It’s that venture capitalists are too narrowly focused on getting three premier names on board, sometimes at the exclusion (or at least delay) of other possibilities.

Morgan Stanley MS, J.P. Morgan JPM, Goldman Sachs GS or wait. Not because those three banks know more potential investors or provide better coverage, but because they give VCs bragging rights at cocktail parties.

There have been 38 IPOs for VC-backed tech companies since the beginning of 2012, according to Thomson Reuters. And one of those three banks was “left lead” on 29 of them (76%).

The remaining nine offerings were split among seven different left leads, proving that there are plenty of alternate underwriters that can get the job done. In fact, one could argue that “the others” could be better hires, given that they’d have fewer distractions.

“There are as many, if not more, banks willing and able to take VC-backed tech companies public today than there were back in 1997 or 1998,” says a source who focuses on public listings. “But where you used to have all the bulge-brackets and the boutiques, now all VCs want is a small subset of the bulge bracket. If the Four Horsemen returned, VCs would probably still hold out for Goldman or the Morgans to take their companies public.”

Sign up for my daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com

VCs need to stop blaming their IPO woes on the decade-old loss of four banks. Instead, they should look in the mirror.

FORTUNE — Ask most venture capitalists about the recent dearth of tech IPOs, and they’re liable to talk despairingly about the “Four Horsemen” — a quartet of boutique investment banks that underwrite a large number of such offerings both before and during the dotcom boom.

“No one has really stepped up to replace the Four Horsemen and we’re all suffering for it,” a veteran venture capitalist said to me this week. “It’s a fundamental problem that persists through both bull markets and bear markets.”

Unfortunately, it’s also a delusion.

The problem today isn’t that there aren’t enough banks willing to take smaller tech companies public. It’s that venture capitalists are too narrowly focused on getting three premier names on board, sometimes at the exclusion (or at least delay) of other possibilities.

Morgan Stanley MS, J.P. Morgan JPM, Goldman Sachs GS or wait. Not because those three banks know more potential investors or provide better coverage, but because they give VCs bragging rights at cocktail parties.

There have been 38 IPOs for VC-backed tech companies since the beginning of 2012, according to Thomson Reuters. And one of those three banks was “left lead” on 29 of them (76%).

The remaining nine offerings were split among seven different left leads, proving that there are plenty of alternate underwriters that can get the job done. In fact, one could argue that “the others” could be better hires, given that they’d have fewer distractions.

“There are as many, if not more, banks willing and able to take VC-backed tech companies public today than there were back in 1997 or 1998,” says a source who focuses on public listings. “But where you used to have all the bulge-brackets and the boutiques, now all VCs want is a small subset of the bulge bracket. If the Four Horsemen returned, VCs would probably still hold out for Goldman or the Morgans to take their companies public.”

Sign up for my daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com