Seriously. They already make a 15mm, an 18mm and a 21mm. Definitely no need for something in between, as most companies only make a 14mm and a 24mm prime

Canon 24-70 II is sharp as is the 14. Weak spot is the 16-35. I normally don't use too many primes (I have 14, 180 macro and long glass) but really no experience with the 18 vs 21. If you had to recommend on to complement my 24-70 and 14, which would you pick.

canon rumors FORUM

I think the ONLY reason Zeiss needs to update their lenses is for the new, high MP sensors. Well, their 50mm can be refreshed. But their 35mm and 85mm are fantastic for anything less than 30MP.

For fashion and portrait work, it's hard to beat Zeiss. I hope they have two different lines for the immediate future. Until I get a camera above 30MP and A LOT more paid work, there is no reason for me to get these uber-lenses.

canon rumors FORUM

Meh....hard to get excited over these. I have and love the Zeiss 21, 25, 50mp and 100mp and love them all. IF this lens is like the 55 1.4 then it will cost the same too which means 3000 Euro or even more dollars. Unfortunately Zeiss seems to have completely turned their backs on the enthusiast market.

I have a feeling Zeiss lens announcements will be like when car and driver magazine shows a new Ferrari. I look at the picture, say wow that is really cool, and then forget completely about it.

Meh....hard to get excited over these. I have and love the Zeiss 21, 25, 50mp and 100mp and love them all. IF this lens is like the 55 1.4 then it will cost the same too which means 3000 Euro or even more dollars. Unfortunately Zeiss seems to have completely turned their backs on the enthusiast market.

I have a feeling Zeiss lens announcements will be like when car and driver magazine shows a new Ferrari. I look at the picture, say wow that is really cool, and then forget completely about it.