You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum. This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.

I will have a big fat angry cow, if they even seriously interview Mel Tucker for the job.

Seriously.

Mike Nolan wouldn't bother me hugely though.

Tucker has already interviewed. I think.
Maybe Rooney rule. Which, in all honesty, makes me just as angry.

Whatever the case.

That's idiotic. Dismiss Mularkey because it's time for a 'fresh start'...then interview a guy who has been with the Jaguars for a lot longer because...why?

He didn't even do good job getting the defense together this year, and obviously the talent on the field plays into that...but really? I didn't like Tucker as a HC candidate last year, and like him even less this time around.

I will have a big fat angry cow, if they even seriously interview Mel Tucker for the job.

Seriously.

Mike Nolan wouldn't bother me hugely though.

Tucker has already interviewed. I think.
Maybe Rooney rule. Which, in all honesty, makes me just as angry.

Whatever the case.

That's idiotic. Dismiss Mularkey because it's time for a 'fresh start'...then interview a guy who has been with the Jaguars for a lot longer because...why?

He didn't even do good job getting the defense together this year, and obviously the talent on the field plays into that...but really? I didn't like Tucker as a HC candidate last year, and like him even less this time around.

At least Nolan has managed to coach some very respectable defenses.

relax bro, it was only for the rooney rule. Silly I know.

that rule is so freakin stupid

Careful...

Speaking of the Rooney Rule, why hasn't Charlie Strong come up in conversation? Maybe he just doesn't want the NFL grind, but I thought he could have had an opportunity as a DC when he took the Louiville job. He's shown a knack for getting a lot out of a little bit through motivation and an attacking style on both sides of the ball._________________

I will have a big fat angry cow, if they even seriously interview Mel Tucker for the job.

Seriously.

Mike Nolan wouldn't bother me hugely though.

Tucker has already interviewed. I think.
Maybe Rooney rule. Which, in all honesty, makes me just as angry.

Whatever the case.

That's idiotic. Dismiss Mularkey because it's time for a 'fresh start'...then interview a guy who has been with the Jaguars for a lot longer because...why?

He didn't even do good job getting the defense together this year, and obviously the talent on the field plays into that...but really? I didn't like Tucker as a HC candidate last year, and like him even less this time around.

At least Nolan has managed to coach some very respectable defenses.

relax bro, it was only for the rooney rule. Silly I know.

that rule is so freakin stupid

Careful...

Speaking of the Rooney Rule, why hasn't Charlie Strong come up in conversation? Maybe he just doesn't want the NFL grind, but I thought he could have had an opportunity as a DC when he took the Louiville job. He's shown a knack for getting a lot out of a little bit through motivation and an attacking style on both sides of the ball.

Get the impression that Charlie Strong is pretty content to just be a real 'program builder' with Louisville for the time being. He may be capable of making the leap, but i don't get the impression he's interested in it at this point.