Thursday, December 06, 2018

Even civic nationalist immigrants like Dinesh D'Souza no longer have any use for "neoconservativism" or its evil defenders:

Bill Kristol
A friend called my attention to this tweet, and distasteful though it is, I'm glad. It reinforces my determination, for what it's worth, to try to save conservatism from the alt-right and to advance a conservatism that "gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance."

Dinesh D'Souza
Maybe the owners of the @weeklystandard should hire some Vietnamese guys to run the mag. This would fulfill @BillKristol ‘s own prophecy that when native-born Americans become stupid, lazy, decadent & overpaid they can be replaced by more industrious immigrants.

Trotsky was not a conservative. Neo-bolshevist world revolution is not conservatism. Bill Kristol's Israel First neo-bolshevism is not only bigotry in itself, it is, quite literally, persecution. Notice that the neocons call for government-imposed international sanctions on Iran, but have successfully lobbied for the banning of the free speech of Americans who call for private boycotts of Israel.

If I was an Israeli government official, the first thing I would do is disown all of these corrupt, parasitical creatures. They are much more likely to eventually convince Americans to declare war on Israel than continue to financially and militarily support it. Everyone absolutely should hate Bill Kristol and the neocons, they are the most grotesquely dishonest, and evil people in the United States.

Notice that evil always, always, always reveals itself in its corruption of the truth, beginning with the perverse redefinition of words that already have a clear and coherent meaning.

Bill Kristol. Never has there been a man with a more repulsive smarmy mug. He looks eerily similar to a former work colleague. He was a two faced dick . It took copious measures of God given self control to not beat his face in.

This is becoming quite the snowball. Prayer U put out a video 3 days ago justifying why America sends so much money to Israel. The Dislikes and Comments are not the reaction they were anticipating.10k Likes but 6.3k Dislikes and over 7k comments, nearly all of whom noticing things that they aren't supposed to be noticing.

Yeah we dumb golem of flyover country were really never interested in identity politics, but identity politics is interested in us and what did the morons of the Israeli First mafia do but pile on us dumb golem like a bad pro wrestling event. Yeah eff em, this dumb golem speaking for myself is practically worn out listening to "conservative values, muh principles" idiocy and will now ask "What is in it for me?"

I'll take President Tough Negotiator over the bow tied admiralty of the cruise ship scam any friggin day.

"For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support."

American Jews love to quote the bigotry part of George Washington's letter to the Touro synagogue in Newport, Rhode Island. Heard it quoted on NPR after the PA shooting too. But has Kristol and his ilk lived up to the conditions that Washington attaches to this toleration of Jews in America? I think not. They undermine at every turn the actual American nation & seek its disenfranchisement.

Isn't is beyond amazing how the ascent of the GE surfaces the insanity of so many?

It is, and it's a gift that keeps on giving. If Trump was a comic-book character he would be called The Revealer or Truth Serum or some such. Villains would babble their innermost thoughts whenever he was near.

The other amazing Trump-related phenomenon is the bad fortune that swiftly befalls so many who disrespect the God-Emperor of America. Macron is the latest example.

S1AL wrote:Sending money to Israel is better than stationing troops there, and we get plenty of useful research, Intel, and tech in exchange.

Mohammedans are our enemies, and so as long as Israel is killing mohammedans, I support subsidizing their purchases of our weapons systems.

Israelis are sharp cookies, and they can use our weapons systems effectively and make them look good to the world. That increases sales, and it gives us valuable real-world feedback on their effectiveness. That doesn't make Israel our friend or ally.

38 Billion. Why do Israelis freak out if we just cut that number in half to 17 Billion? Or nothing? They could get donations from their overseas population, same as, you know, the Phillipines, Ecuador, Albania. Since their diaspora has fantastically wealthy people in it, their transfer payments would be correspondingly higher.

After that, we wouldn't need to have an opinion about Israel being good or bad. They would be invisible, in the same way Belize, Bhutan or Mali is invisible to the American gaze.

The first thing I noticed about NeoCons is their tendency to be "former Leftists", as if a person could ever be a former Leftist without retaining elements of Leftism.

The second thing I noticed about NeoCons was how few of them are actually Americans and in spite of their constant flag waving, none of them are actually patriots. It isn't that they are loyal to the US, they just want to borrow a few brigades of US troops to intervene in an on-going war elsewhere in the world. But they instantly gag and choke anytime the suggestion is made to use the US military to defend the US border.

NeoCons love this country like a glutton loves his lunch. They certainly have no affection for the people who live in this country, unless they were born elsewhere.

Kristol has always been one of the worst of the gang of extremely bad actors - the Trotskyites who wrapped themselves in the US flag to promote wars for 'creative destruction'. May he join Juan McStain in a dank corner of hell soon.

We have always been asked to tolerate other people. That toleration is certainly a virtue of undeserved grace. But I always ask myself, if those we are tolerating had the overwhelming power over us....would WE be tolerated by them?

It really does not matter which minority we are talking about...Jewish, Hispanic, Negro, American Indian, Roman Catholic, or any foreign national. If they commanded the government by virtue of an overwhelming presence in this country, would any of them tolerate US in their midst? If the answer is "NO", then you must be feeling a bit foolish.

I've got an even better idea: don't send them money OR troops. The American government was formed by The American People FOR The American People. It was not formed so we could financially and miltarily support other nations, that was NEVER its intended purpose.

Imagine the billions we send to Israel every year being used to, I don't know, provide homes and food for American veterans, or help out the economically depressed Appalachian citizens.

Crazy thought, I know. Shame about the Jews all getting wiped out if we stopped propping them up, but, hey, if an individual citizen wants to give their money or life in support of Israel, go for it, but that's not the purpose of our government.

Quick idea: easiest way to get rid of Israel-Firsters is to get rid of Israel. Same concept as ridding ourselves of Anti-Semitism by ridding ourselves of Semites (more technically, Semitic behavior, but behavior is biologically intertwined with one's race, so it's the same thing).

No Israel, no Israel-Firsters. Quite simple, logically. In practice, it's as easy as not sending Israel any money, troops, or technology/weapons. Don't even have to get our hands dirty personally.

Solon wrote:Shame about the Jews all getting wiped out if we stopped propping them up ...

If Israel and the Jews are really God's Chosen as the evangelicucks believe, they would not be wiped out. God will protect His own. This business of claiming that Israel depends on us shows a disturbing lack of faith in God. Or, perhaps, it reveals that they really don't think that modern Israel is the fulfillment of prophecy at all.

@20 The Scribe - I notice that VD has the 16 points now linked under the title 'Nationalist Right' on this webpage. I think that is a much better representation of VD's brand of alt-right. Alt-right is now way too nebulous of a descriptor (because there is huge discrepancy of worldview among alt-righters).

I suppose alt-right now basically means - 'uncucked conservative' but then there is this endless argument among alt-righters with regards to what consists of being cucked and uncucked.

With regards to VD now entertaining branding his discourse as Nationalist Right ........ I think it would be even better captured as 'ethnic nationalist right' because there is also such a thing as 'civic nationalist right' (i.e. - Trump, at least as far as what he says - though Trump does play his cards carefully ... he may actually entertain more fondness for ethnic affiliation than he lets on. That is hard to read, partly because emphasized fondness for ethnic affiliations is a component of human nature, and so everybody is more or less predisposed to this in any event. The question becomes - how much is the natural human tendency mitigated by other factors within a person's belief system and identity.)

The first thing I noticed about NeoCons is their tendency to be "former Leftists"

Outside the US, the 'neocon' scheme is commonly known as neoliberalism. Somehow they found their invade the world invite the world credo a tough sell among Dems (in the past, at least), so they re-branded as "cons".

Israel theoretically has nuclear weapons, submarines, and the Masada Plan so it won't be normal for then to be wiped out. The current plan is to pressure them like boiling a frog, the same way the Progs try to incrementally ban firearms and pressure people not to bother with them.

Ron Unz will no doubt be despised as a 'self-hating Jew' by the tribe for the rest of his days, but he really pulled back the curtain to reveal the ugly creature behind admissions to elite universities. So much for the mythologies of meritocracy, superior intelligence, etc.

http://www.unz.com/ishamir/unz-goes-nuclear/WOW. The linked article above is well worth reading.

Dinesh is the voice of the assimilated minority. He's friendly towards Trumpism because his identity is as much under attack from the multicultural expecations and demands that minorities bring with them when the scale of immigration reaches a certain level. Reminds me of the hollywood movie Gangs Of New York, in which the new wave of irish immigrants fight the old irish immigrants. The new immigrants have a completely different agenda - where speaking English isn't even a priority - to Dinesh's generation, or, if it's too much of a generalisation to say the old immigrants were better, at least to the subset Dinesh belongs to.

@28 & @43. - yes - Ron Unz provided a nice overview of the wonky admissions issues at the Ivy Leagues. But Kevin MacDonald already revealed this very dynamic at the Ivy Leagues a few years ago (3 or 4 years ago I think). And as well, KM was very critical of Steven Pinker's whitewashing of this issue at that time.

Steven Pinker (of jewish heritage) had a fairly good reputation as a person trying to be unbiased. I bought that shtick. But here we have the supposedly sincere Steven Pinker trying to lie to everyone's face at the time about this issue. That was the last straw for me. The JQ then became an issue I could no longer avoid by dismissing as quackery, and so since then I have made my own investigations. The investigations are not difficult. Come upon a writer spouting a certain kind of nonsense (like postmodernism for instance, or virulent forms of feminism for instance, or pretty much any ideology damaging to western culture), and look said person up on Wikipedia. Takes 30 seconds. Wikipedia will most usually identify influential jewish people as of jewish heritage in the 'Early Life' section of the bio. Lo and behold, upwards of 50% of writers of bunk that gains mainstream traction that is damaging to western culture are of jewish heritage. Just out in the open, plain as day for anyone to see, by way of Wikipedia.

So the first question becomes - why do so many jews hold positions of cultural influence?, (which looks to me to be about 20x more than one would expect based on demographics).

And the second question becomes - why do these influencers want to wreck western culture?

I still don't really know the answers to these questions. I speculate that it has something to do with a psychological pathology (akin to borderline personality disorder) that this group is perhaps predisposed to. Probably some innate group tendencies magnified by something occurring in the socialization process perhaps. But that is just speculation. What is telling (to me) is that nearly all jews will tend not to disavow these psychopaths (of the BPD femmy bent) in their midst. I think the group probably has a greater preponderance of psychopathy than European ethnicities, and furthermore, the group is much more likely to close ranks around their psychos compared to European groups. But like I said only speculation. But what are the alternative explanations? A conscious jewish conspiracy towards world domination? No - more likely there are unconscious or subconscious elements at play here that uphold this dynamic.

But nevertheless, I would not underestimate the weight of the 'god's chosen people' belief creating havoc within the jewish subconscious. It is beyond retarded that elements within the Christian west uphold this belief. No self-respecting Christian should entertain such nonsense.

Israel is very useful tu us.First, it's a good example of an ethno state. Mainly in that it exists at all, and consists of The Special People. Diversity for thee and not for me is a powerful meme. Second, they defend their borders in such matter that tells every liberal American Jew that they best STFU on the subject of borders.And finally, because of Israel, any American Jew clamoring for any taxes, gun control, or anything on how America ought to be, can be reminded that their concern is not so critical seeing that they do in fact "have their own country to go live in" and their ideas for running ours have the weight of a tourists opinion on our weather.

Heartiste has an essay on "Ashkepathy" which cites ¡SCIENCE! as well as Unz and Pinker (small world). Some of his comments at the end:

The Hoaxin’ have on average a much higher incidence of both the genes which predispose to paranoia and the genes which predispose to psychopathy and aggression.

This gene combination appears to be stunningly effective at boosting IQ test scores and presumably the material success (and possibly sexual success, at least for the males — any reader have a study I could cite here?) of the people possessing it, but it comes at a great cost to the society in which this kind of person is numerically and socially significant.

The personality trait combination of high anxiety with high aggression/psychopathy is rare among human groups, and really deserves its own categorization: ashkepathy. On the B5 inventory, a person with ashkepathy would score high on Neuroticism and low on Agreeableness....

This will come as no surprise to anyone who's spent a lot of time rubbing shoulders with Ashkenazi.

I generally don't like to punch right-- the right is too small and already face down in the dirt culturally to add my damage to those who are statists. I look at them along the lines of "will they help convince the moderates or the middle to come toward my way or not or are they too toxic?" The neocons, which I always thought were dangerous, tended clearly to reveal themselves as not of the right or even republican in the era of Trump. Trump was such a challenge to their leftist world view that they went Never Trump. They went so far as to show that they never really left their beginnings as statists/dems. Hopefully they will leave the repubs without a militant wing-- I mean look at Bush the younger-- elected on "I will not nation-build abroad" and he became a bigger idiot in messing up the international scene than anyone since Roosevelt (imho even more than O! O was merely incompetent and didn't realize the mess he was making, or was trying to let Islam run free).

@49 One of the more fantastic theories of jew-gentile conflict is that it's the continuation of a prehistoric conflict between Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon proto-humans.

On first glance that kind of a theory wouldn't merit much attention except that if you look at pictures of jews in side profile, their skull shape does tend to resemble the Neanderthal phenotype more then the Cro-Magnon phenotype.

Whether it's true or not, one could probably make an interesting sci-fi / alternate history story out of it.

@53 and @55 - thank-you for the link. Food for thought there. The only jewish people I have known personally have been professionals (in academics or medicine), whom I have only known very casually (dinner parties and such) and these individuals have always struck me as thoughtful, mild, sincere, and interesting conversationalists with vigorous minds, (like Steven Pinker comes across). So this whole JQ thing is still very confusing to me. Sometimes I feel like a jerk for the above mentioned speculations (which I mainly keep to myself in my social circles).

Perhaps I should try to make friends of some jewish people, to get to know them better, to make better judgements. For instance - Ron Unz - quite a likeable fellow it seems. This whole thing is so confusing. That's why I think it might be an unchecked minority within the group that causes most of the trouble.

Quick idea: easiest way to get rid of Israel-Firsters is to get rid of Israel. Same concept as ridding ourselves of Anti-Semitism by ridding ourselves of Semites (more technically, Semitic behavior, but behavior is biologically intertwined with one's race, so it's the same thing).

No Israel, no Israel-Firsters. Quite simple, logically. In practice, it's as easy as not sending Israel any money, troops, or technology/weapons. Don't even have to get our hands dirty personally.

That would work just fine for Kristol (who really does have a permanent sneer that is just made for a 12-guage at point-blank range) and the likes of Frum, Max Boot, Wolfowitz, Perle, Mr. Reversion-to-the-Mean (Podheretz), Uncle Sheldon (Adelson), etc. - assuming the Israelis would be stupid enough to accept such a gang of evil cretins into the country. (There so seem to be a few of them over there who have some sense.)

The far bigger problem in terms of Israel-firsters are the 'Evangelicucks' (as someone above termed them). They are far greater in number and still cling to their corrupted bibles annotated by Cyrus Scofield when they go to church to worship their idol the Judeo-Christ (yet another skin of Satan). The whole story of how this bizarre edition of the KJV Bible, having been authored by a half-literate individual with an essentially criminal background, ended up being issued by the then very picky (but not picky enough) Oxford University Press is quite remarkable. No doubt the generous encouragement of the Lotus Club in NYC - an invitation-only organization to which the 'Rev.' Scofield was invited - particularly that from the very wealthy Zionist shyster (((Samuel Untermeyer))) was of sufficient quantity to overcome whatever reservations the Oxford folks might have had about issuing such an edition of the King James bible.

Sunni and Shia would get along peacefully, along with that sect the Assads belong to? The Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928, wouldn't be stirring up trouble? The Saudi royal family would rest securely on their thrones?

Is it? It strikes me as basically a form of "Dems are the real racists.""

I agree that it is another Dems are the real racists. Who are the target audience? The Right and the uncuckable middle might respond to it. The Left would brush it off: of course diversity is for your neighborhood. They know that.

We need memes to encourage ourselves, memes to sway the Normies, memes to dismay and terrify the Left. They probably won't overlap much.

i would like to welcome our Brother Dinesh D'souza as the newest White Supremacist in the NAZI Party of America.

"This opportunist is trying to smear a brown-skinned immigrant who wrote for his own magazine and served as a policy analyst in the Reagan White House with the nasty epithet “alt-right,” all to prove his political usefulness to his new friends on the left"

If you don't police/suppress/exile/kill the members of your own population that act out, you've got no gripe when another, more responsible population decides it is necessary to rid themselves of the lot of you by whichever one of the above means they deem most expedient.

Discipline yourselves, or someone else will. Rule yourselves, or you will be ruled by others.

If I was an Israeli government official, the first thing I would do is disown all of these corrupt, parasitical creatures. "I am a Bolshevik." -- Ben Gurion, 1st Prime Minister of Israel, Defense Minister during JFK assassination (resigns shortly thereafter.)

-- One is either nescient of Russo-Bolshevist convergence in combination with the usual banking suspects from its inception to the present (Promis/INSLAW and 9/11), or actively pulling weight for for the Likudniks with these kinds of statements. Delineate and make discrete Zionism -- which is a primary stake in the legacy 'deep state' -- from whatever 'native' Pharisee nationalism you have in mind: the conflation itself subversive and Petersonian. "You don't have to be a Jew to be a Zionist." -- Joe Biden, and the entirety of the Fake Right Richard Spencer types. There is no 'Israeli nationalism' as long as the Zionist State exists, as it serves the world dominion of a chosen few.

And this is all in the context of appearing on the Alex Jonestein show, whose host (married to two jewesses) has been 'visted & threatened at home by Mossad', is 'texted personal congratulations by BiBi Netanyahu' on Trump's election, and cannot say the word Zionism to save his life (only MUH CHICOMS -- whom are using the Israeli high tech backdoors.) The notion of Zionism being a strictly alien, Diaspora (or secular, communist one) is the quintessence of blue pill shabbossery; Jews that reject Rabbinic, Pharisaical Talmudism/Sabbateanism & the Zohar are an impotent schismatic splinter with miasmic political presence/agency. Dunning–Kruger is also fractal, and this Zionism-As-A-Nationalism is a recapitulation of the antimonies within American Libertarian thinking that led to an exodus toward more Right-thinking alternatives. Zionism cannot be both a Deep State bete noir for over 100 years at this moment, and salt of the earth frenulum deficient LARPer 'nationalism' in the Levant that has to be defended on first self-determination principles, or even alluded to rhetorically speaking to the Fox News Ziocucked Churchianity crowd. Zionism/Talmudic Judaism is the antecedent to Bolshevism in the Synagogue of Satan order of operations. The assassination of the Romanovs is being investigated as a ritual killing for a reason.