If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Here it is, what everyone anticipated was right on the heels of the Weistec M156 superchargers, the Weistec Mercedes SLS AMG 750 Supercharger Kit. This supercharger is the same 2.3 liter twin screw unit used on the M156 motors however the setup on the SLS is much stronger. 638 wheel horsepower for a Weistec M159 SLS 750 supercharger vs. 538 for a Weistec Stage I+ M156 supercharger. A 100 wheel horsepower difference is nothing to sneeze at and anything over 600 wheel is simply incredibly powerful.

The changes the M159 sees versus the M156 account for the majority of the difference between the two. No doubt people will also notice the difference in price between the M156 and M159 supercharger setups and that is to be expected with different tuning, a smaller market, and necessary hardware changes to accommodate the SLS. 638 wheel horsepower, a curb weight in the 3600 range (lighter than any factory Mercedes with the M156), and a dual clutch transmission make for one of the strongest performance platforms in the Mercedes world today. Oh, and yes, CARB approved.

The features for the SC were listed in the same manner here as the features were listed in the post for the M156 NA tune.

Actually in the thread for the M156 NA Tune, the details of the package were listed only on the dyno graph image - namely the aftermarket filters and what not. There was no other text outside the image that detailed what type of filters, charcoals, etc... So in that thread, I suggested that you should list the package details in some type of text outside the dyno graph image, maybe somewhere in a text area in the first post of the thread so that it looks more organized and provide more details. Then you said in your opinion having all the details of the package listed only on the graph is sufficient. However, in this thread you did exactly what I requested. You listed all the details of the package in a text area outside the dyno graph image altogether. LOL, for a minute there I thought you did it as a joke for what we did in the other thread

Actually in the thread for the M156 NA Tune, the details of the package were listed only on the dyno graph image - namely the aftermarket filters and what not. There was no other text outside the image that detailed what type of filters, charcoals, etc... So in that thread, I suggested that you should list the package details in some type of text outside the dyno graph image, maybe somewhere in a text area in the first post of the thread so that it looks more organized and provide more details. Then you said in your opinion having all the details of the package listed only on the graph is sufficient. However, in this thread you did exactly what I requested. You listed all the details of the package in a text area outside the dyno graph image altogether. LOL, for a minute there I thought you did it as a joke for what we did in the other thread

No, what was done was the features as provided by the tuner were listed and this was done in the exact same manner as before if you read the product pages. There was no difference in listing anything on my part.

The dynograph still lists important details I hope people do not miss like the octane quality of the fuel and that the baseline is with a completely stock car which has nothing to do with features of the kit that were listed.

No, what was done was the features as provided by the tuner were listed and this was done in the exact same manner as before if you read the product pages. There was no difference in listing anything on my part.

So they must've changed their style on their end then because it is definitely different. They must've read some of the comments and acted upon them. I really hope they weren't reading the rest of the gibberish we created in their other thread, as I feel bad that the whole thread was ruined in the midst of all the different arguments back and forth. I think 99% of the posts were not even about them.

Originally Posted by Sticky

The dynograph still lists important details I hope people do not miss like the octane quality of the fuel and that the baseline is with a completely stock car which has nothing to do with features of the kit that were listed.

And that was exactly my opinion from the other thread: list a small summary on the graph but always provide a list of details in a nice organized structure outside the graph