I love the hitler version. Made me laugh in tears. _________________There is, a not-born, a not-become, a not-made, a not-compounded. If that unborn, not-become, not-made, not-compounded were not, there would be no escape from this here that is born, become, made and compounded. - Gautama Siddharta

With the possible exception of 9/11, that would probably be mostly friendly fire wouldn't it? Unless you count casualty US soldiers as victims, which is arguable.

I suppose that depends on the proportion of civilians in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq, Somalia, and Libya that one counts as "friendly" to al Qaeda. The most accurate way to break that down would probably be 'militant Islamist fundamentalists, Jihadi sympathizers and drug dealers' in the "friendly" camp, and "everybody else" in the "just trying to survive" camp. So yes, I think the bulk of what you seem to think of as "friendly fire" (apparently for ethnic reasons) are indeed "victims".

However, why would you make 9/11 an "exception"? I don't see the logic is writing off 3,000 horribly murdered innocent civilians. What is your thinking behind that?