Zyklon B is a chemical, it was used as a weapon.
You can try twisting it all you like, Spicer will probably be gone over this, why defend him?

Because you unscrupulous puritans are dogmatic to the point of absurdity. You use minor quibbles and hair-splitting, all of it derived from sources
hostile to the administration, as avenues from which to deflect from their main points, which you neglected to touch on so you could play amateur
historian. You guys are crooks and frauds, who, if you were placed in the same position, would melt under the pressure.

did hitler use chemical weapons on his people? did spicer say that hitler did not use chemical weapons on his people?

The Nazi's under Hitler in WWII did not Use Chemical Weapons on the Battlefield . Corporal Hitler in WWI was a Victim of a British Mustard Gas Attack
, and Suffered Temporary Blindness from it . He developed a Deadly Fear of such an Inhumane Weapon of War . In WWII the Germans refrained from using
them Fearing the Allies would return it in Kind Tenfold . That Fear did not Stop them from using Zyklon-B Poison Gas Pellets in their Extermination
Camps Killing Millions of Men Women and Children , thus Proving how Insane a man like Hitler and his Cronies really were .

Idiocracy rolling in America. I couldn't even understand what he was trying to say until people posted on comment compare to battlefield use and gas
chamber use. Its still count as weapon either way. Hitler just did it by hunting and hording people by secret.

This is getting cliche, but I heard almost the same thing on
NPR a week ago. Stephen Rapp, a former U.S.
ambassador at large for war crimes under President Obama:

No question this is, you know, having won Aleppo and Idlib, area - being an area that's still under opposition control and having gotten away with
mass murder and crimes that weren't even committed in World War II, the regime is ratcheting it up to show that it can get away with essentially mass
atrocities in order to win its war.

originally posted by: sdcigarpig
After seeing that clip and hearing it and watching the video the following can be stated:

Did this man even pass a history class when it comes to World War I or World War II? Does he not understand that the people who were mercilessly
murdered in Germany, were in fact German Jews, and people that the state found undesirable?

And these jews were brought to ‘the Holocaust center’, according to Spicer.
The government of the Divided States is getting more laughable and ridiculous from hour to hour.

You can be as uneducated as hell, stupid like nobody else, you just need money and the right "friends" to get in power. But not a brain, as it
seems!

"You had someone as despicable as Hitler didn't even sink to using chemical weapons."

Except he did, and he done a lot worse than Assad, surely you agree with that.
To somehow suggest Assad is worse than Hitler is quite simply wrong, there have been a number of people you can compare to Hitler, Assad probably
wouldn't make the top 10.

It is obvious he meant chemical munitions. To suggest that Spicer forgot about, is ignorant to, or is denying gas chambers is beyond even my conceit,
but it is the going rate in this thread.

That is likely what he meant since sarin gas was developed expressly as a chemical weapon of
warfare. The end result is the same though and spicer does look ridiculous comparing Assad to Hitler's atrocities.

originally posted by: Swills
Either they're the most incompetent administration already or this is all planned. I don't think it's the latter since Trump has proven time and time
again how incompetent he really is.

Yeah, he's carrying the torch from the previous administration nicely, at least in some regards.

This is getting cliche, but I heard almost the same thing on
NPR a week ago. Stephen Rapp, a former U.S.
ambassador at large for war crimes under President Obama:

No question this is, you know, having won Aleppo and Idlib, area - being an area that's still under opposition control and having gotten away with
mass murder and crimes that weren't even committed in World War II, the regime is ratcheting it up to show that it can get away with essentially mass
atrocities in order to win its war.

Zero outrage noted after the interview.

Gee what a total shocker.

As dumb as this was, I'd just like to point out the irony that some of the people complaining about comparing Assad to Hitler were perfectly ok with
comparing Trump to Hitler. To those people I say, your outrage is fake and political and you should get a life.

It was a real stupid statement but he is not entirely wrong either. Hitler developed a horrific fear from chemical weapons since he was gassed in WW1.
After rising to power he proceeded to make sure that chemical weapons were never used in a conflict again. Of course there is still that one incident
that got already mentioned many times in this thread but it could be possible that Hitler was persuaded by hos generals to use the gas. Himmler and
Mengele acted as shadow figures behind the planned extermination of the unrein(unaryan) population. Mengele did horrific experiments on them and he
allegedly was linked to occult practices too. The Thule group for example.

I only heard and read Hitler and WW2 stories from the german perspective and oh boy are our schools making sure we hate everything what the Nazi
regime did without questioning. Now since i looked into that myself i'm not so sure that what we were told was the absolute truth. I have no idea what
they teach you in other countries about this subject but there are a lot of discrepancies on both sides. I more and more suspect that the worlds
history is not what it seems. Perhaps that's the mother load of consipracies and they still do everything to hide the real truth.

Before people accuse me of being a Nazi and Hitler sympathizer let me stop your right there. WW2 was an absolute mess on both sides and i hope we will
never repeat our mistakes.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.