Humiliating Internal Data Shows The NY Times Was Overtaken By Online Rivals 'Years Ago'http://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-times-digital-statistics-2014-5/comments
en-usWed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 -0500Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:33:20 -0400Jim Edwardshttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/537577cd6bb3f7493adc9062Truffle PigThu, 15 May 2014 22:28:29 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537577cd6bb3f7493adc9062
If by "HP" you mean Huffington Post, it's about 4,000 times more liberal than The New York Times.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537577216bb3f7153ddc9063Truffle PigThu, 15 May 2014 22:25:37 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537577216bb3f7153ddc9063
*Times'http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537576acecad04fe11dc9062Truffle PigThu, 15 May 2014 22:23:40 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537576acecad04fe11dc9062
The NY Time's website is one giant Rube Goldberg machine. Way too busy and way too much stuff going on, and the interesting content to uninteresting content ratio is terrible. That's why I don't read the site aside from a random article every now and then. The paywall is laughably easy to circumvent. Just turn on private browsing, or use any of the other methods, but the average person doesn't know about these and who the hell wants to pay for online news when there are 14 billion free sites?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537530b0eab8ea487a03fe4aPetuniaThu, 15 May 2014 17:25:04 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537530b0eab8ea487a03fe4a
I stopped caring about the NYT when they stopped printing the news and became a propaganda machine for the liberals. I can read that crap for free on HP.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5375129feab8eaa305360e2dtom1295Thu, 15 May 2014 15:16:47 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5375129feab8eaa305360e2d
"He has been wrong about nearly every 'Prediction' he makes." Do you have statistics to back up this statement? It is a little dated now but this study shows the opposite: <a href="http://www.hamilton.edu/news/story/pundits-as-accurate-as-coin-toss-according-to-study" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.hamilton.edu/news/story/pundits-as-accurate-as-coin-toss-according-to-study</a>http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537510e8eab8eaa305360e25eilonwyThu, 15 May 2014 15:09:28 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537510e8eab8eaa305360e25
The NYT implemented its paywall in mid-2011, and the homepage view decline starts within a matter of months. This was predictable -- indeed, I'm pretty sure that at the time, management was on about how there'd be fewer views, but that didn't matter because the online subscriptions would pay more than online advertising did. From the handwringing in the internal report, I take it that didn't work quite as planned.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53750b7d69bedd5e4191670eAntiKenyesianThu, 15 May 2014 14:46:21 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53750b7d69bedd5e4191670e
It is obviously Paul Krugman's fault, the man is a complete moron. Why is he even famous? He has been wrong about nearly every 'Prediction' he makes. If he were to write an article that the sky would be blue tomorrow it would somehow by green by sunrise. Either he is just the dumbest man alive or the entire universe is conspiring against him. Either way he should have his credentials stripped and be sent to Cuba where his actually could not possibly make things worse.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537509136bb3f7f32f360e2aAre we surprised???????Thu, 15 May 2014 14:36:03 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/537509136bb3f7f32f360e2a
The NYT has devolved into a high-class tabloid filled with the same old left-wing talking points and cherry-picking of facts. No surprise here.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53750745ecad04f00891670eDean WormerThu, 15 May 2014 14:28:21 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53750745ecad04f00891670e
And this is news because........Virtually all traditional media companies failed early on to truly embrace the digital revolution, instead clinging to old ways. remember go.com? ABCs brilliant strategy to link all of its digital operations together to build a massive unified online presence.......broken into bits by internal political fighting. News corps dismal loss of what $800 Mil on Myspace?
The sad part is that the NYTimes was an early leader in digital, but politics, and paywalls doomed them....and even while their very existence is threatened, they cling to liberal editorial which has been shown over and over to be rejected by the majority.