Talk:Wanted Level in GTA V

Contents

Why was this page deleted?

I don't really get why this page is deleted. I know it's just rumors, but you guys should have kept it so when it's released we wouldn't have to type it ALL OVER AGAIN! FernandoMartinezzz (talk) 03:27, August 29, 2012 (UTC)FernandoMartinezzz

As you said , it's just rumours. No matter how real they look there's always a 90% chance of being FAKE. We can't have rumours on this wiki. If it proves to be true, the delete will be rollbacked and we'll have the page again.Dodo8Talk

10:12, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

Does Rollbacking a page return all the edits before it was deleatingZamomblue222 (talk) 15:14, June 30, 2014 (UTC)

Source

Source for three to five star wanted level information: Bradygames Strategy Guide

- Source is realiable and will stay thank you :D.

Military

Please take note, I still need someone to verify I'm not the only one being chased outside of Fort Zancudo. Until then, take the MILITARY section with a grain of salt. Bar27262 (talk) 20:08, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

From now on

Mistaken Error Occured

From Now On, If you are going to add information to the article, you must provide a realiable source rather then just fighting, because some information are fake like the blaine country cops. They ARE THE SAME AS THE LSPD Cops. If no realiable source is provided or it does not happen it will quickly be reverted to its normal position. Stop it now or else someone will get reported and no one wants to happen not even me. Keep in mind im saying before its too late not im an admin, Of Course im not an admin, but i help the article be reaibale User:Actually JPH

GTA Online - does it need to be split from this article?

A lot of the argument and edit warring in this article seems to me to be caused by the difference between law enforcement behaviour in GTA V (aka) "Story Mode" and GTA Online. In my opinion, while there are obvious similarities in the response, there are also enough differences to possibly warrant a new page for Online, particularly given the ever-evolving treatment of Online by Rockstar making it possible that Police behaviour Online will change from update to update, while remaining the same in GTA V. Smurfynz (talk) 05:21, October 2, 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring over 2 or 3 Mavericks needs to STOP now.

Now's the time when I really want an HD capture card instead of my cruddy old PAL format card...

Here are 2 images I just captured at 4 wanted stars showing 3 Mavericks after me in GTA Online sorry they are not HD clear.

FAKE, THE 3RD MARVICK IS LEAVING AND THE 2 ARE CLOSE TO YOU, STOP LYING FAKER SEE THIS SITE: [1] YOU CAN SEE HES A 5 STAR WANTED LEVEL AND THERE IS 2 MARVICKS, STUPID IDIOT WHO SAID 3. (Unsigned by RazorShotter)

Still fake, these reasons may tell you WHY you have 3 police marvicks:
1. You went into the ocean, and the 3 helicopters appear
2. A helicopter was close to you (possibly)
3. You were in the car chase for too long.
4. You were flying a helicopter
5. You were on the celling.

You guys are stupid I have a GTA guide book people and it explains the wanted level It says here "At least 2 police marvicks will be chasing the player, 3 marvicks can be sent, If the player was in the water or was flying a helicopter".

ALSO, I THINK YOU GOT OFF A CAR AND THOSE 2 HELICOPTERS WERE FOLLOWING YOU AND THE 3RD WAS DROPPING 4 NOOSE MEMBERS. (Unsigned by RazorShotter)

I'm getting really sick and tired of this... I will upload the video then. Let me put it this way - a video showing 2 choppers does NOT disprove three choppers. A video showing three choppers DOES disprove 2 choppers. Geddit? Your guide book is wrong. Smurfynz (talk) 22:55, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Don't insult others RazorShotter. Smurfynz is right and he has proven his point. Just because a guide book says something it doesn't mean it's the absolute truth, in fact many of them offer outdated and incorrect info. DocVinewood (talk) 23:03, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

This is fake 2 helicopters are chasing you, One helicopter is dropping 4 NOOSE members to the ground and will be leaving. (Unsigned by RazorShotter)

Proof, or it didn't happen. In this case, it didn't happen. Simple as that. "Don't worry,--File:4-300x216.jpg--it's only collateral damage." 01:09, October 18, 2014 (UTC)

Time to Protect

I think it's time this page be protected. Too many edit wars have happened on this page. () 23:37, October 17, 2014 (UTC)Smashbro8

See my note above from 2 weeks ago about splitting V and Online - I think that may still solve a lot of the warring. But yeah, it's been warred over since it was first published. Smurfynz (talk) 23:49, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Evidence.

Pure and simple. Captured and uploaded by me, not some random youtube search result with unknown video edits, bits of the screen missing or any cheats enabled (or from September 2013 as all other videos being used as evidence have been).

Apologies for the capture quality, not bad for my cruddy, unplayable 10 year old PAL capture card.

Conclusion

Page protection

I do not want the page protected, why does it? It sound stupid. 123johnpaul (talk) 16:29, November 2, 2014 (UTC) 123johnpaul

If you don't want the page to be protected, why do you always cause an edit war if someone reverts your edits? () 21:36, November 1, 2014 (UTC)

You are the reason it needs protection. If English is not your first language, you are NOT in a position to question the English language skill of others. I gave a clear reason in the Edit Summary why "Should the player..." is a valid sentence construction. Smurfynz (talk) 21:41, November 1, 2014 (UTC) Oh please be quiet. 123johnpaul (talk) 21:55, November 1, 2014 (UTC) 123johnpaul

I agree with Smash. The page contains sufficient content, you are currently violating this policy by reverting every edit. Rain - Talk 21:43, November 1, 2014 (UTC)

Im not in edit war Smash and Raining, Smurf is actually, whenever i try to fix stuff he reverts them and says fix your english. He is really annoying me and always insulting me with his damn reports to administrator so yeah, Smash please protect it he will always get into a edit war :( 123johnpaul (talk) 16:26, November 2, 2014 (UTC) 123johnpaul

Please see the edit history and you will see he keeps reverting every one of my edit. 123johnpaul (talk) 16:29, November 2, 2014 (UTC) 123johnpaul

1. Do not remove talk page comments by others. If an admin deems it necessary, they have the rights to do so.

Be quiet Smurf, were both edit warring because you kept reverting other peoples edits. Were both the reason why we need this article protected, not just me. And your english sucks as well. If I was at your house, I would disconnect all of your computers. For real, you should get a job and enjoy life not waste it on video games. So we are both the suspects and victims. 123johnpaul (talk) 21:27, November 2, 2014 (UTC) 123johnpaul.

FYI

123johnpaul and his temporary sockpuppet account have made a total of 80 article (non talk page) edits, 59 of which have had to either be completely reverted or at least re-edited to correct poor grammar. I was the one who reverted or edited a total of 5 of these. Yeah, I'm picking on him (rolleyes)Smurfynz (talk) 05:31, November 3, 2014 (UTC)