Paolo,
I can confirm that we accept the proposed resolution.
Thanks,
Petr
On 1.6.2010 16:51, Baggia Paolo wrote:
> Petr,
>
> We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to re-publish the CCXML-IR in a short term.
> Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider implicitly accepted the resolution. If you need clarification, please ask them very soon.
>
> Paolo Baggia
> Author of CCXML-IR Plan
>
> ISSUE-687:
>
> Proposed Resolution: Reject
>
> The spec considers all URI to adhere to [URI], see Appendix J.4
>
> =================================
> This is tracked as ISSUE-687.
> ---
> RJ Auburn
> CTO, Voxeo Corporation
> tel:+1-407-418-1800 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting +1-407-418-1800 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>
> Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit, June 21st - June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel, register today for your All Access Pass:
> http://www.voxeo.com/summits/customer
>
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Petr Kuba wrote:
>
>> 5) Relative target URI in<send> using basichttp.
>> Script 9_2_5_B.txml.
>>
>> The CCXML specification, Appendix K.4 states:
>>
>> The target attribute MUST be set to the access URI of the external
>> component.
>>
>> The script assumes that the target URI is relative to the processed CCXML document:
>>
>> <send targettype="'basichttp'" target="'9_2_5_B_500.jsp'"
>> name="'user.ass_570'" sendid="send_id_1"/>
>>
>> However, it is not stated anywhere that the target in basichttp should be relative to the CCXML document. Is this desired feature? Then it should be stated in Appendix K.
>>