Few Physicians Report Using E-mail to Communicate Clinical Issues with Patients, Despite Strong Interest Among Some Patients and Policy Makers

WASHINGTON, DCOnly about one in four physicians (24%)
reported that e-mail was used in their practice to communicate clinical issues
with patients in 2004-05, up from one in five physicians in 2000-01, according
to a national study released today by the Center for Studying Health System
Change (HSC).

The American Health Information Community (AHIC), a recently formed federal
commission, has identified secure online communication between physicians and
patientsespecially those with chronic conditionsas one of a limited number
of "breakthrough" information technologies targeted for rapid development.
Moreover, 80 percent of online Americans would like to communicate with their
doctors via e-mail, according to a March 2005 HarrisInteractive Health Care
Poll.

"Despite strong interest among policy makers and the public, most physicians
are not rushing to embrace e-mail communication with patients," said Joy
M. Grossman, Ph.D., study coauthor and a senior researcher at HSC, a nonpartisan
policy research organization funded primarily by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Based on HSCs nationally representative Community Tracking Study Physician
Survey, the studys findings are detailed in a new HSC Data BulletinPhysicians
Slow to Adopt Patient E-mailavailable here.
The 2000-01 survey contains information on about 12,000 physicians and had a
59 percent response rate, and the 2004-05 survey includes information from more
than 6,600 physicians and had a 52 percent response rate.

"While some health plans are testing payment for e-mail consultations,
reimbursement remains limited, and thats likely a major barrier to physician
adoption," said coauthor Allison B. Liebhaber, an HSC research assistant.

Physician-patient e-mail is most common in larger practices. Physicians in
staff/group-model health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and medical school
faculty practices reported the highest rates of adoption (47% and 43%, respectively),
followed by physicians in group practices of more than 50 physicians (29%).
In contrast, only about 20 percent of physicians in practices with nine or fewer
physicians reported adopting e-mail use, the study found.

However, growth in e-mail adoption essentially stalled in larger practices
between 2000-01 and 2004-05. At the same time, smaller practices with nine or
fewer physicians did have statistically significant growth in e-mail use.

"The stagnant growth among large practicestraditionally early IT adopterssuggests e-mail use is not progressing rapidly," Grossman said.

While some patients are eager to communicate with their physicians via e-mail,
not all patients have access to e-mail. Rural, low-income, elderly and African-American
consumers are among those less likely to have Internet access and, if they have
it, to use e-mail, according to the Pew Internet and American Life Project.

Practices with higher proportions of such patients may move more cautiously
to offer e-mail consultations because of more limited patient demand and capability.
Indeed, physicians in practices in nonmetropolitan areas, practices with high
Medicaid and/or Medicare revenue and practices with a high percentage of African-American
patients are less likely to report e-mail is used to communicate with patients,
according to the HSC study.

The study cautioned that the findings be considered an upper bound on the proportion
of physicians regularly using e-mail in their practices because physicians were
asked about e-mail availability in their practice but not whether they actually
use the technology or the frequency or intensity of use.

### ###

The Center for Studying Health System Change is a nonpartisan policy research
organization committed to providing objective and timely research on the nations
changing health system to help inform policy makers and contribute to better
health care policy. HSC, based in Washington, D.C., is funded principally by
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and is affiliated with Mathematica Policy
Research, Inc.