Unfortunately for the gullible and
this nation’s survival, all the wrong choices that enslave people are
now being disguised as political “rights”. And anybody who doesn’t approve
of their choices is in violation of their “rights;” and labeled as bigots,
homophobes, intolerant, and wrongfully discriminate. And Heaven help us
they convince even governments to approve their “rights” over the “unalienable”
right of “free exercise of religion”!! Canada has just been conned into
doing just that!! There was a maxim in the U.S. Air force that is appropriate
here, (with cleaned up language): “Don’t defecate in your own mess kit!”
A bit gross; but the point is clear. But Canada has done just that; and
free speech and religious freedom is on the way out in Canada. How close
to home can it get??

The real tragedy is that they’re working
their tails off to destroy the most effective way of escaping from their
bondage—which, of course, they refuse to admit they’re in, or accept accountability
for.

Wrong Choices Can’t Live With Truth

For wrong choices to be disguised as
truth, truth must be denigrated and disguised as untrue. As Paul says
in the first chapter of Romans in the Bible, “professing to be wise they
became fools.” But then man deprecates the Bible as “being written by
man,” and, therefore, subject to error and fault. (Isn’t this really an
admission that their belief in the reliability of man is flawed?) But
the truth is that the Bible is a revelation to man, written by men who
heard directly from God, and by those who were contemporaries of Jesus
Christ and eye witnesses to His works.

This rejection of the Bible and its
truths is further validation of a maxim I once wrote on another occasion,
“Attitude is more powerful than truth or reason in determining and explaining
human behavior.” Again, the attitude-based opinion that man has no need
for God is based on the belief that man is sufficient unto himself. As
a wise friend once said, “Ain’t thata crock!!” If this were true no man
would want for anything because he would be capable of producing and acquiring
everything needed to satisfy his every need or want. How many men have
achieved this—and are happy? Ever heard of Solomon? I believe it was the
Durants who stated that the world has been free of wars in less than 400
years of the last 3000. And in the last century alone man has managed
to murder over one hundred and fifty million of his neighbors. Worshiping
idols (man) will getcha every time!

There’s another Scripture men who make
bad choices don’t want to hear, but is most appropriate: Its Jeremiah
17: 5, 6: “Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength.
Whose heart departs from the Lord. For he shall be like a shrub in the
desert, and shall not see when good comes…..”

The Guilty Accusers and Their Real
Agenda

The ACLU and other atheist don’t want
the government involved with God—except to shield them from Him and to
prevent citizens who believe in God from exercising their Constitutional
right to “free exercise of religion.” If they want to be atheists the
Bible gives them that right of free will. But it doesn’t give them the
“right” to prevent the rest of us from choosing life and “loving the Lord
our God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength and our neighbors
as ourselves.” Why would they want to destroy the very basis for a peaceful
and wholesome society? It doesn’t “take a rocket scientist” to see the
answer!

They want their “right” to licentiousness
to supercede all other rights—free speech and freedom of religion in particular—and
be the law of the land. They can’t abide any body of law or religion that
is condemnatory or contradictory of their choices of behavior or beliefs;
and that’s tyranny! As an example, Julian Huxley, Darwin’s “hit man” said,
when asked why he pursued the theory of evolution, “God interferes with
our sexual mores.” (Licentiousness is defined by Webster as, “lewd, lascivious,
and uncontrolled by moral restraint.) They have promoted the theory of
evolution because it “conveniently disposes” of God as the Creator and
Master of the universe. And it equates and lowers man to the level of
rutting animals in heat. That they would put their very souls at risk
just for illicit sex doesn’t show much “smarts,” does it? The Bible, which
they have no regard for, says in Romans I: 18, “For the wrath of God is
revealed from Heaven against all the iniquity and wickedness of men who
unjustly suppress the truth.” A simple conclusion comes to mind: When
they get too old to indulge in their precious “idol and right,” sex, they’ll
be “ridin’ on empty!” That is, if they get to be old enough to be labeled
“dirty old men.” The “wrath of God” can appear in many worrisome and subtle
ways that they chalk up to “bad luck.” Can’t admit that God can be right,
now can they?

An Obvious Conclusion

There’s that law of contradiction again:
If man is really self sufficient he would certainly know that wrong choices
always contain their own punishing consequences—for them and/or their
neighbors, and avoid making such choices. But, the evidence is irrefutable
that not only does man not avoid such choices, he defends them before
other men and expects them to approve or be condemned for their “intolerance!!!”
Ergo, man can’t work against his own self interest and still be self sufficient!!
Self deficient is more apropos. As I have said before, attitude trumps
reason and truth—especially secular attitudes.

A man of faith can stand alone with
God and make good choices; but, men without faith will “go nuts” without
the approval of other secular men. They’ve gotta have acceptance, even
if it is harmful.

Judicial Tyranny Denies Religious
Freedom

So, to continue their quixotic joust
against God and His preferred choices, a bunch of smart, but attitude-afflicted,
Supreme Court justices got together and concocted a doctrine called “separation
of church and state.” There was no Constitutional basis nor precedent
for it—just had to get rid of God in public places where people can see
and hear His Word. The real motive for this assault on the rule of law
is really transparent. This edict puts the State in charge of deciding
and enforcing where, when, and how the “freedom of religion can be exercised.
Is this not a self defeating edict? How can there be “separation of church
and state” if the state is given the power to supervise the exercise of
religion? This is a major contradiction!!! The effort to protect behavior
destructive of society from God’s judgment has indeed corrupted even our
Constitution!! There’s those “Foxes” again. I think it was Ben Franklin
who said (paraphrased) “We have been given a free republic---if we can
keep it.” It looks dangerously as if we are loosing it one “unalienable
right” at a time to justify the “enemies” choices of behavior.

President Johnson also attacked the
churches by silencing them with the 501 (c) 3 laws that disarms them in
the political arena—even though this puts a chink in the “wall between
church and state” by giving the state a controlling influence over church
finances and political freedom. This law prevents churches from “grass
roots” political action in promoting political candidates sympathetic
to their beliefs. What happened to “free speech” and the “free exercise
of religion?”

Unbelievably, this is a similar move
to that made by King George in England, when the churches in colonial
America became so critical of him and his moral turpitude. He tried to
force churches to be licensed under control of the state. The churches
rebelled and became prime movers and facilitators in the revolution, and
the establishment of a free nation where we could worship God without
government intervention. Is history repeating itself? Has the “specter”
of King George’s court invaded our Supreme Court?

A “Clear and Present Danger”

The tragedy is that this “attitude
system” has the power to destroy entire nations, as it did France, Germany,
Russia, the Roman Empire, Greece, and now Canada, ad nauseum. Starting
with one family at a time. It is presently corrupting our judicial system.
Our federal judicial system is now barring the free exercise of religion
in this country by judicial fiat. Some judges have assumed that God should
not be allowed to influence man’s choices in life in governmental venues.
They say that our constitutional right to the “free exercise of religion”
is way down at the bottom on the scale of important “rights”. They’ve
effectively said that man’s right to choose God mustn’t interfere with
the “right to choose” licentiousness! Sound crazy? See Justice Kennedy’s
opinion in Lawrence v. Texas. It really gets “nuts” when the real effect
of all this is seen for what it really is: Judicial fiat is decreeing
that man shouldn’t have the right to encourage other men, in public venues,
to listen to God’s side of the argument and “choose life instead of curses”
Aren’t they saying it’s wrong to try to save one’s neighbors from making
choices that will harm them and their neighbors?! Responsible behavior
in society is made “a bad thing.” No wonder some people in neighborhoods
don’t care who lives next door!

Purported specialists in the law are
actually saying that laws based on morals must not interfere with the
rights of man to be immoral! That’s downright contradictory and dishonest!!!
The “right” to be immoral has been given priority by our government officials,
irrespective of God’s position on the subject. In Stone v. Graham, the
Supreme Court said that if Kentucky schools are allowed to display the
Ten Commandments, children might be induced to “…..read, meditate upon,
perhaps to venerate and obey the Commandments.” And that’s a quote!! It’s
hard to believe that a bunch of our best legal minds could be so damn
stupid! Aren’t they saying that it is wrong for schoolchildren to obey
the Ten Commandments? Somebody should make them take a course in American
History 101 that explains that the founding fathers designed the governmental
structure of this nation to be based on “principles that do not change,”
found in “The Law of Nature and of Nature’s God.” Under the most logical
interpretation of the doctrine of “separation of church and state”, the
Court, being part of the state has no authority to make such a convoluted
decision respecting the “free exercise of religion!!” There is no “enumerated”
right in The Constitution that gives the Supreme Court the power or authority
to regulate, supervise, promote, deny, prohibit, or interfere with a citizen’s
“free exercise of religion”. In fact, such actions are expressly prohibited
in the First Amendment. Only and “enemy” in judicial robes would disagree
with this assertion!

More Corruption of Law

In Canada, a man has been sanctioned
and suspended from his employment for publicizing in a newspaper the Biblical
scriptures against homosexuality, of which there are many and severe.
So in Canada the Bible has become the subject of fascistic censorship.
That’s scary as hell!! That’s happened right next door!!!!! Tyranny is
just over the border and coming this way!!

Don’t be surprised when courts will
force you to say to a burglar who has entered your home, “you shouldn’t
steal and put my family at risk; but, the law says I can’t personally
attack you and stop you? Your right to invade my home and steal my property
trumps my right to protect my home and family.” If you think this is far
out, that actually happened in England. A man was put in jail for shooting
a burglar who broke into his home!!!!! Incredible! And in Chicago, a man
was cited for using a gun to protect his home against a burglar who had
also previously invaded his home. It is apparent that the “enemies” will
go to the extreme to keep destructive behavioral choices from being punished—even
covetousness, theft, and violation of property rights! The attack on the
rule of law is getting more intense every day!

The Obvious Made Obscure by Bondage

But we don’t have to go outside this
country to view the effects of the attitude that licentiousness is a “liberty”
that has become a political “right.” As has been said, it is fundamental
that for a viable society to exist and prosper it must be regulated by
the rule of law that ignores “political correctness” and dispenses even-handed
justice for all. There are two glaring examples where this rule of law
has been brazenly violated in favor of the “right” to licentious “liberty:”
The first occurred at the highest level of our government. The Senate
refused to convict President Clinton, the nation’s highest law enforcement
officer, who lied under oath in a properly constituted tribunal, and to
the American people, and violated his oath of office. The rationale: It
was “only about sex” and “failed to rise to the level of ‘high crimes
and misdemeanors’”, and, therefore, not an impeachable offense. THE EGREGIOUS
EFFECT OF THIS CORRUPTION WAS TO POLITICALLY AND LEGALLY ELEVATE THE “RIGHT”
TO LICENTIOUSNESS ABOVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RULE OF LAW! There can be no
other conclusion, no matter how hard one tries to rationalize it otherwise.
Tawdry sex was given higher priority than even-handed justice and an orderly
society. This is about as high as one can get on the scale of “high crimes
and misdemeanors!” And what is really frightening is that the majority
of citizens polled agreed with the Senate. Incredible! Is this another
indication of just how many “enemies” are out there? Does this not validate
our Founding Fathers’ use of the term “mobocracy?”

The second example is equally egregious:
The Supreme Court in 1973 decreed that a mother can execute her unborn
child at will. The effect of this has been to give one individual the
absolute right to execute another individual, without due process of law!!!
If anyone doubts this effect one has only to ask, “What will the unborn
child, who is verifiably a discrete individual, become unless it is executed?”
So, again, the rule of law against murder (one of the Ten Commandments)
was corrupted in favor of the “right” to licentiousness. Over 90% of abortions
are for the purpose of birth control. This Supreme Court decision has
resulted in the death of more individuals than all our wars put together.
Is that harmful to society or what!!!! How many “enemies” wear judicial
robes?

A more recent and glaring example of
elevating licentious “rights” over the rules of “The Law of Nature and
of Nature’s God” is the Massachusetts’s Supreme Court’s approving the
“right” to marriage between homosexuals. The rationale was that that state’s
constitution contained no provision for “second class citizens.” This
decision actually elevates licentious genocide over the rules of law that
protects the institution of marriage between male and female essential
to the perpetuation of man himself! What’s good for order in society is
subjected to the behavior that would destroy that order. If man were self
sufficient and the “measure of all things,” he certainly wouldn’t make
such stupid, self-destructive decisions. If this isn’t prima facie evidence
that man needs guidance from a Being much smarter than he is, then there’s
no hope. “They have eyes, but do not see, and ears, but do not hear.”
But there is hope for those who would open their eyes and ears, and their
hearts.

Justifying Guilt Is Futility

The wrong choices make one so attitude-driven
that truth becomes irrelevant; and, therefore no objective examination
to find the truth is even considered. A search for only self serving justifications
is important. Therefore, I will venture to say that those who denigrate
and reject God and The Bible have never tried to talk to Him, other than
curse him, or to read and study His Word. If they’ve opened the Bible
at all it more than likely was an effort to “find and take a text out
of context that can be used as a pretext.” To try to use the Bible and
the Word of God to justify choices of behavior that is destructive of
society makes one a “charter member” of the “enemies” of society. For
example, The Bible clearly condemns homosexuality in several scriptures
as destructive of people and society. But those who choose to continue
to engage in homosexual behavior allege that God “made me this way”. And
they further proclaim that those who believe the Bible, e.g., the Boy
Scouts, “discriminate” against them by refusing to approve of and accept
their behavior. So, they encourage charitable organizations and government
entities to discriminate against the Boy Scouts, who would rather reject
homosexuality than God. The tragedy is that there are a lot of people
who are naïve enough to swallow that contradictory junk!! Those who profess
to be against “discrimination” want everyone else to accept their “rights”
to discriminate. Only “enemies” would think that that’s okay and makes
sense!

Bill Champion is a semi-retired
management consultant who has been active in several fields: Developing
managers from “caretakers” to motivated, result-oriented achievers; Management
team development; Developing and writing management training manuals;
Arbitrator; Negotiator collective bargaining agreements; Active in state
political arena; Contract lobbyist at Nevada State Legislature for Gaming
Industry and private businesses; University Instructor in Labor relations.

A graduate of Case-Western Univ.
Vice president of Human Resources at original MGM Grand Hotel, Las Vegas.
Hobbies: Writing and Golf. Authored several essays on politics and religion.
Now engaged in writing book on history of the “mob” in Las Vegas, and
who really killed Bugsy Siegel. Bill's

For wrong choices to be disguised
as truth, truth must be denigrated and disguised as untrue. As Paul says
in the first chapter of Romans in the Bible, “professing to be wise they
became fools.” But then man deprecates the Bible as “being written by
man,” and, therefore, subject to error and fault.