Thursday, July 21, 2016

THE REAL GOD PARTICLE

“LET
THERE BE LIGHT”

Is
the Photon the Real God Particle?

The
Higgs Boson was first called the “God Particle” in a book by that name written
by physicist Leon Lederman and science writer Dick Teresi. In an interview, Teresi explained that Lederman
had used “The God Particle” as a working title for the manuscript as a joke,
not as a serious title suggestion, and that he and Lederman were actually both
atheists. In the beginning, the title didn’t even refer to the Higgs boson, and
they were a bit embarrassed when the publisher saw it and wanted it as a title.
To their surprise, and the dismay of most physicists, the name was picked up and
promoted by other science writers and the media to generate interest in the search
for traces of the particle that physicist Peter Higgs and others predicted
based on mathematical analysis of the standard model.

So
the scientifically uneducated media and the general public liked the name God
particle and the Higgs boson and physics got stuck with another popular
misnomer much like the big-bang misnomer. The words “Big-bang” were first used
by astronomer Fred Hoyle to ridicule the idea on a radio program interview. He actually
opposed the idea of an explosive beginning to the universe, and was appalled when
the name stuck and became the accepted popular description of the theory. So “big
bang” and “God particle’, arguably the most misleading and inappropriate
descriptors associated the current scientific paradigm, originated as tongue-in-cheek
off the record remarks taken out of context and promoted by people who have
little understanding of the theories of particle physics and cosmology.

Concerning
the term God particle, it would be much more appropriately applied to the photon
and/or the electron, because together, the photon and electron are the wave-particle-field
phenomena that actually make up the physical universe. And they have far greater ratios of TRUE units
of gimmel to TRUE units of mass and energy than any other quantum entities.

To
truly understand the nature of light, is to understand the nature of reality.

Let’s start with Maxwell’s wave equation, which describes the
propagation of light as the alternating expansion and contraction of electric
and magnetic forces in three dimensions. Imagine an expanding, pulsating
sphere. Then move on to de Broglie’s particle/wave equation:

Next, we see that Schrӧdinger’s wave equation for light is the quantum
mechanical form of Maxwell’s wave equation interpreted as a probability
function; that is, it describes the distribution of probable locations of the light
as its fluctuating energy moves through space-time. Quantum mechanical
experiments show us that it does not exist as a localized particle or wave
until it makes an impact upon a receptor. And a choice made by a conscious
observer determines whether a particle or wave phenomenon will be recorded.

Finally, application of the Calculus of Distinctions and dimensional
extrapolation to the electron spinning in nine dimensions, suggests that, under
certain conditions described by the appropriate Conveyance Equation, an
electron may be transformed into light, spreading throughout all dimensional
domains, creating the nine-dimensional structure of space-time and consciousness.
Finally, the energy of this radiation appears to be a localized phenomenon
(wave or particle) as it is reconnected with Consciousness when the associated
electromagnetic pulse is received in the consciousness of an observer.