Many Boomers Expect Their Children To Try Illegal Drugs

Many parents of the baby boom generation who used drugs when they were
younger expect that their teenage children will do the same, and they
believe there is little they can do to stop it, a survey released last
week revealed.

The parents surveyed by the National Center on Addiction and
Substance Abuse at Columbia University expressed little confidence in
their ability to control their children's decisions about whether to
use drugs. Among the study's findings were:

46 percent of baby boom parents surveyed--and 65 percent who said
they used marijuana in their youth--believe their teenage children
will try illegal drugs;

40 percent said they had "little influence" over their children's
decisions about drug use;

Two-thirds said other factors, such as their children's friends
and media images that glamorize drug use are to blame for teenage
drug use;

Only 14 percent of parents in the survey said they were primarily
responsible for their children's use of narcotics.

"What is infuriating about the attitudes revealed in this survey is
the resignation of so many parents and teens to the present mess," said
Joseph A. Califano, Jr., the president of CASA and a former U.S.
secretary of health, education, and welfare during the Carter
administration.

The CASA study is based on telephone interviews with 2,300 teenagers
and parents during July and August. The poll's margin of error is less
than 3 percent.

Its release comes weeks after a federal report that found that
overall illicit-drug use among 12- to 17-year-olds has more than
doubled in recent years, from 5.3 percent in 1992 to 10.9 percent in
1995. ("Increase in Drug Use Raises
Issue of Prevention," Sept. 4, 1996.)

The CASA researchers also found that even the lives of young people
who abstain from drugs are often touched by them. Fifty-eight percent
of teenagers said they had a friend who had used LSD, cocaine, or
heroin. And 62 percent said they had a friend who had smoked
marijuana.

Among 12- to 17-year-olds who had yet to sample drugs, 22 percent
were "very or somewhat likely" to try them in the future, the study
found.

If they do decide to try drugs, the teens said, they won't have much
trouble obtaining them. Nearly 70 percent of 17-year-olds said illegal
drugs were kept, sold, or stored at their high schools; 28 percent of
12-year-olds told interviewers that their schools were not
drug-free.

Gary Marx, a spokesman for the American Association of School
Administrators, called the survey results alarming.

Parents must be held ultimately responsible for their children's
actions, he said. "If parents feel their children's drug use is
inevitable, they are less likely to do something about it, and that
causes all sorts of problems."

Teenagers who live with two parents are less likely to use drugs or
be admitted to substance-abuse treatment programs than those living in
single-parent households, according to a federal study released last
week.

The report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
also analyzed differences between children who live with biological or
adoptive parents and those who live with stepparents.

Adolescents living with a single parent or in two-parent families
where one of the adults is a stepparent, for example, are 50 percent to
150 percent more inclined to use illegal substances or enter a
drug-abuse facility than those who live with two biological or adoptive
parents, the report shows.

The HHS study also found that teenagers who live with a biological
father and a stepmother are more likely to abuse drugs than adolescents
living with a biological mother and a stepfather.

Because fewer children today are living with their biological
parents, society has a greater responsibility to deliver a consistent
message that drugs are dangerous, HHS Secretary Donna E. Shalala said
last week in a statement.

"Parents raise children," she said, "but all of us have an
obligation to give them a helping hand."

Little League baseball is a relatively safe activity with a very low
rate of severe injury, according to a study published last week in
Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

In interviews with the managers of two Little League organizations
in suburban Rochester, N.Y., during the 1994 season, researchers found
that fewer than 3 percent of the players were injured during a total of
more than 140,000 hours of play.

Of the 2,800 Little Leaguers included in the study, 81 required
medical attention, the report says.

About half of the cuts and bruises sustained by the players, whose
ages ranged from 7 to 18, were from being hit with a ball. Twenty-seven
percent of the wounds and strains resulted from collisions with other
players.

The authors say that greater use of safety equipment, such as face
masks, could help reduce the casualty rate even further.

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.