DID YOU KNOW THAT in the U.S. POLICE ARE UNDER NO....NO...LEGAL OBLIGATION TO "PROTECT" ANYONE......?.

LET THAT SINK IN.

[And so NOW I want to know if any of this event in FL was REAL.......Was anyone actually killed or wounded? Have there been any funerals? Any death certificates or deaths reported to any government authority? OR IS THIS ONE JUST LIKE SANDY HOOK, WHERE NOT ONE REAL DEATH TOOK PLACE? Is this FL shooting another HOAX?]

So, the sheriff's deputies who stayed behind cover, outside the school, and refused to try and take out the shooter, were following the procedures laid out by this FBI instructor. They were putting the responsibility on the shooter and letting the public (students and teachers in the school, in this case) take the "risk"”and protecting themselves "first".

So, when the American people assume that it is the policeman's job to protect them from an armed aggressor, they are completely mistaken. It is NOT the responsibility of policemen to protect us.

Whitehead elucidates this subject: According to the U.S. Supreme Court, police have no duty, moral or otherwise, to help those in trouble, protect individuals from danger, or risk their own lives to save 'we the people'.

In other words, you can be outraged that cops in Florida did nothing to stop the school shooter, but technically, it wasn't part of their job description.

Let that sink in too, folks.

"Exactly, and too further add more awareness to this gem; ALL law enforcement in this country, including, and especially the entire military, are task with securing the interest of Their primary benefactor, 'The Bank', first and foremost, but may elect from time-to-time, as extenuating circumstances arise, exercise discretionary interest in favor of the public, providing that those interest do not conflict with that of 'The Banks', whether having been disclosed to the public previously, or not."