The twofer construct, transposed to
circumvent the 22nd Amendment, is now poised
to retake power. A self-replicating,
Constitution-specific pathogen, the clinton
nano-presidency, post-9/11, is a danger that
we cannot -- we must not --
abide.

elete
hillary:
a simple purpose, but hardly simple to achieve. And
yet it is critical that we do.

These are not
ordinary times. America is waging the global War on
Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric
netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is
brutal, subhuman; the threat of global
conflagration
is real.

It
isn't that they can't see the
solution. It is that they can't see
the problem.

G.
K. Chesterton

...
While America appears not to be ready for a female
president under any circumstances, the post-9/11
realities pose special problems for a female
presidential candidate. Add to these the problems
unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the
mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic
female presidential candidate running during
ordinary times.

These are not
ordinary times. America is waging the global War on
Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric
netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is
brutal, subhuman; the threat of global
conflagration
is real.

Defeating the
enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she
must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset.
To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is
essential that the collective patriarchal islamic
culture perceives America as politically and
militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this
requirement presents an insurmountable
hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and
especially missus clinton, historically
antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is
only enhanced today by her clumsy,
termagant parody of
Thatcher),
forever
the pitiful victim,
and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in
the clinton administration."

Hillary
Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living
history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that
light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on
this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on
Pearl Harbor.

The context
of our concern today--regardless of political
affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the
larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the
requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat
the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the
will?

In
particular, do we have the will to identify and
defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to
no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving
in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this
insidious new threat to our survival.

What we
decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much
about what awaits us in these perilous new
times.