State takes cautious approach to freight hub proposals

A dizzying number of transportation-related proposals centered on Detroit's mid-continent location are floating around Michigan. They have funny names (Aerotropolis), links to faraway locales (Halifax, Nova Scotia) and impressive engineering goals (a rail tunnel tall enough to handle double-decker cars). One common thread through most of these proposals is a need for investment. The ideas are outracing the dollars.

Peter Anastor is director of policy for the Michigan Economic Development Corp.

A: Michigan is working to leverage and promote all our significant assets in order to become a global transportation, distribution and logistics gateway. To accomplish this, we will need to prioritize the opportunities and identify barriers associated with various types of infrastructure and (Transportation, Distribution and Logistics) projects. Any project that strengthens our assets is certainly important to Michigan and will receive consideration for support as we further develop our vision.

Bridge: A major rail expansion was just announced in Toledo -- $160 million for rail yard improvements that could lead to 275 jobs. Does this announcement make it more or less likely that proposals for SE Michigan will move forward?

A: One of Michigan’s assets is our connection to global infrastructure networks. We will make decisions on projects based on the capability to extend our connections to global markets or to make our system more efficient. Key to this will be ongoing efforts to form partnerships that can bring about a successful and efficient TDL system for Michigan.

Bridge: What are the principal hurdles to attracting more freight business through southeast Michigan?

A: The greatest hurdle currently is a lack of a clear, coherent and unified vision to leverage our TDL assets. In addition, we need to ensure an inter-connected TDL system that efficiently links to global connection points in order to increase freight volume and reduce costs.

Bridge: The NITC project has drawn the lion's share of transport attention in Lansing in recent years. Why do you think the Michigan business community has not taken to the airwaves to counter the Moroun family's opposition to NITC?

A: We have overwhelmingly widespread support for the NITC from the business community, with all significant business stakeholders (except DIBC) backing the NITC.

Bridge: Would MEDC favor the creation of a "super" transportation board to oversee the existing entities in southeast Michigan -- Detroit Airport Authority, Port of Detroit -- and focus efforts on a broader multimodal freight strategy? Why or why not?

A: For Michigan to become a global transportation, distribution and logistics hub, we will need to find ways to leverage our assets and develop an efficient system to move goods and people. The specifics of how to create the most efficient system have not been developed, but all options will be explored to ensure we are well-positioned for success.

Bridge: Can Michigan successfully pursue multiple freight hubs? MEDC has given support to the I-69 corridor effort -- is the Flint/Port Huron area a better fit for a freight hub than SE Michigan? Why or why not?

A: The I-69 corridor effort is one of four Next Michigan Development Corporations that have been approved by the state. The Next Michigan Development Corporations are important because they provide additional tools that are clustered around significant TDL assets in Michigan. The other three are in the Lansing region, Traverse City region and Detroit/Wayne County region.

Bridge: If you could communicate only one idea about freight economics to Michigan taxpayers today, what would it be?

A: Michigan has an array of existing assets that can be leveraged to develop our state as a global transportation, distribution and logistics hub. This will lead to more jobs and greater investment in our state. The key will be to develop a unified vision and efficient TDL system that will connect our businesses to the global economy.