This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our world. Watch and become AWARE!
3.5 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.

Thursday, May 25, 2017

The latest Muslim terrorist attack ripped apart little girls at a
concert in Manchester, England, on Monday, killing 22. The death and
body-part count is still rising.
This is not a game. When young British girls are the targets of a
suicide bombing, can we take a short break from the posturing, political
correctness and Russia conspiracy theorizing? Won’t the hatred of Trump
keep for a few weeks?
Channel-surfing on Monday night was like watching broadcasts from
different countries. While Fox News and CNN covered the terrorist
attack, MSNBC concentrated on the real news of the night — TRUMP’S
COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA — as children screamed in the background in
footage from Manchester.
It was a big enough step for MSNBC to stop claiming that the
“explosion” was just popping balloons. The hosts reasoned, We know that
Islam is a religion of peace, so what else could it be?
CBS and NBC News finally produced the name of the suicide bomber —
the next day. (After any terrorist attack, the media like to keep us in
suspense for as long as possible about whether it was a Muslim or a
Christian.)
Even then, the answer was difficult to find on either network’s
Twitter feeds, which were bristling with minute-by-minute updates on
former CIA Director John Brennan’s congressional testimony about Russia
and Trump: Yes, collusion was investigated. No, Brennan is not aware of
any evidence to support the theory. BREAKING NEWS!
The media didn’t gaudily broadcast the bomber’s name, religion or
ethnicity in their headlines, but at least they finally coughed up the
information. He was Salman Abedi, son of Libyan “refugees.”
Apparently, the media think you can’t be trusted with that
information. You might notice that the West is deliberately importing
people who enjoy killing kids.
According to ABC News, the bomber’s father, Ramadan Abedi (not to be
confused with Huma Abedin) was a member of an al-Qaida-linked Islamic
group in Libya. For this, he was accepted as a “refugee” by the British
government.
Liberals’ main reaction to the attack was not to demand the toppling
of the terrorist-friendly British government, but to worry about an
upsurge in Islamophobia. They say there’s nothing we can do about
terrorism and we probably shouldn’t do anything anyway, because we
deserve it.
These were teen and preteen girls! Is there any fuel left in the gas tank of humanity, or are we just running on fumes now?
While liberals are impatient to get back to their murderous
immigration policies, conservatives are pining for war. And really, who
wouldn’t want to send ground troops to Syria after our tremendous
successes in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Why do we need to fight ISIS in Syria again? I forget. How about we
NOT send U.S. troops to some godforsaken nation of primitives?
My reasoning is: It will cost us trillions of dollars; we will
sacrifice the lives of an untold number of our best young men in combat
(and little girls — thanks, liberals!); and we will accomplish
absolutely nothing, apart from creating a new stream of “refugees” and
making the primitives even angrier with us, if that’s possible.
Historically, starting wars in the Third World has not proved salutary.
Trump was elected for one reason: Because he promised to put
Americans’ interests first. If only he’d stuck to his campaign promises,
he’d be a hero right now.
The one promise Trump has kept is the so-called “Muslim ban” — and
he’s looking prophetic on that. The Ninth Circuit was probably just
about to release its opinion affirming a Hawaii judge’s revocation of
Trump’s travel ban, but after Manchester, they’ll have to sit on it for a
few weeks.
Wouldn’t you rather be defending Trump for imposing a travel ban,
building a wall and deporting “Dreamers,” than for idiotic leaks about
nothing? If Trump started removing undesirable foreigners, liberals
would rush back to the airports, en masse, and forget all about Russia.
The most humane response to terrorist attacks in the West is to kill a
bunch of them for revenge, and then concentrate on our own problems.
Instead of sending ground troops to Syria, we should be sending them to
San Diego.
Our policy following every Islamic terrorist attack anyplace in the West should be the following:
1) We drop a nuke on some majority-Muslim city involved in terrorism.
2) We add six months to the immigration moratorium (which Trump
promised us in his Aug. 16, 2015, immigration policy paper, the greatest
political document since the Magna Carta).
3) We deport one Ninth Circuit judge.
Since Trump, politics has become a game to liberals. The media is a
game. Hollywood is a game. Islamic terrorists are killing little girls
in England. This isn’t a game.

4 comments:

Agree, Don't send our troops - our young men to Syria to fight ISIS! ISIS is like a fungus that just keeps growing. Russia knows how to get rid of them apparently, and Obama knows how to "play" pretend wars by keeping our men from having the proper military ammo and gear to actually go in and get the job done and then get out ALIVE! Donald Trump needs to run the country and not the main stream media propaganda spinners, and him being a military man, I'm pretty sure he knows how to keep ISIS out of America. The Deep Underground Secret govt. should not be running our country. The globalist agenda should be obliterated.

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

11

Followers

The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.