If you choose Anarchy that means people can break in your house and take whatevee tf they want or people can kill anyone they want without getting in trouble im going based off the comments but if there's no government or laws or pretty much rules people can do whatever they want which if you think about it it's kinda bad

No actually people who chose anarchy are not stupid 12 year old kids, they are people who actually know what anarchy really means, well some of them, (it means no laws nor government nor national leaders) and feel as if they could handle it rather than live in a society even worse than it is now.

Anarchy can lead to a new, and better developed country. It may fail pretty bad as well, but it can be escaped too. Authoritarian government would have the resources to ensure you have no hope of escaping and the very name is practically a decision that they will do it.. unlike random people that, although likely filled to the brim with maniacal concepts, only can challenge you so far in their limited resource scenario... if they even want to -for that is a question for them. That said... I do think a lot of people over-estimate the value of anarchy. Complete freedom does still mean complete exposure. If anything, I think secession is the best choice. I just hope someone actually figures out what the new nation should be in their case if they attempt such for their sub-population.. and no I don't support the choices of the CSS except for secession itself.

Anarchy means complete freedom. Neither of these choices are good, but when there is more freedom there is more than one mind in power, when only one person, or union controls everything they can destroy everything. If everyone lives by their own rules, then some would fight for the good, and some would fight for the bad, but either way that's what would happen. No matter what type of government, or non-government you have there will be conflict. So to the people who said for choosing the second option I must be a twelve year old kid, know that I made a choice, and that defines me, but it is my opinion, and does not make me anything other than what I am. I simply see what I want to see, and I see more hope in anarchy.

no goverment doesnt neccessarily mean civil war or that everybody kills each other. just stay away from big cities and have people you know around you. its also an opportunity for a better new country.

At least in an authoritarian nation some or most people (it depends on who you are) are safe, but with anarchy, somebody could enter your house and brutally kill you if they feel like it, and not one person would question them, because they would be too busy running for their own lives. NOBODY would be safe from that.

I don't really want a government that is constantly monitoring me and could come knocking at my door without good reason. I admit, I did have to look up anarchy, but I am a naive person and I think the small amount of people in my immediate rural area would not be too troubled. People in more densely populated areas are screwed, though.

being forced to be part of a country that killed 11million people, and probably having to go to war, and die, or if i didnt be forced to watch over the genocide of an entire race vs. having no government(no rules) and chance people breaking into my house/murdering me. i think i'll take my chances