I have to agree with ZEN here, as my instincts are telling me similar. Why else are the ARBs waiting to make their announcement of their decision on Floyd Landis. Have they found themselves caught between a rock and the cliff's edge?

We know that many experts from scientific and legal backgrounds had contacted Floyd Landis and his defense team in providing their input to his case. So, I wonder how many may have contacted USADA and slammed them with similar input, not to mention just how many cycling fans who may have slammed them with their input as well.

EXACT: If I were an attorney on the USADA list of arbitrators, I'd make it known through the secretary's office that my own 'read' of the testimony indicates ACQUITTAL, and any other outcome would force me to dis-associate myself.

"Professional Credibility" does mean something tween attorneys (if not the rest of the world)...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.