maman

23 October 2017

So here's what i understand in terms of deciphering ideology. Ideology is might as well be called as a fundamental, yet sophisticated, philosophy to hold on to on a civilized society. This philosophy has 3 distinguished general means to be implemented, which are: social, politics, and economy. I don't know whether or not the definition above is written anywhere but that's more or less what i learned, and it comes in very handy whenever i try to root out bottom lines. The ideas require the whole 3 systems to be totally implemented or else the whole system may collapse, being unideal.

The 3 means are the trinity of the ideology, they might not have similar shapes but they're one. The social order is addressing the specific culture of the ideology. The politics is, traditionally, the consensual means to obtain the fully functioning ideal society by maintaining stability, being the catalyst of the social's ideals. The economy is a mechanism, a medium which has the identical aim as of the politics', but is not necessarily as straightforward.

The social order is the Father, the politics is the Son, the economy is the Holy spirit, and the ideology is substantially the God. I'm very bad at making analogy but that's the best i can do, hope no one got offended, you know people these days.

13 October 2017

So i've been reading some books and watching some documentaries ─ though i know it was not enough ─ about libertarianism or of libertarians' for, i don't know, maybe around 2 years. And lately, i'm really going mad.

At first i thought i got the idea, the bottom line, i was pretty sure that i got the bottom line of libertarianism. But after the latest reading and watching, i can officially say that i don't understand a fucking shit about it.

So, i'm not in the capacity of saying that i'm a big fan of Noam Chomsky for i believe that i haven't read enough to state that. But by far, he's been fucking up my head through only 2 books of his. But i hate him cause he fucked my whole understandings about libertarianism, which happened to be something i started to think as something worthwhile to adapt as something equal to life principles. Only after i watched the last 3 documentaries, which were Manufacturing Consent (1992),The Corporation (2003), and Requiem For The American Dream (2015), i found out about the existence of the opposite wing of libertarianism conception i got in my head: something named libertarian socialism, the left wing of libertarianism.

I know that's stupid, i know. I know that's very stupid like after more than 2 years i just found out that libertarianism itself got different stances on viewing. But dude fuck it i really don't understand why things should always be so complicated when it comes to this kind of philosophy.

10 November 2016

ATTENTION! THE WHOLE WRITINGS IS UTTERLY MY PLAIN OPINION TO DEFY TRUMP'S WINNING THROUGH SOME POINTS OF VIEWS WHICH I'M NOT AT ALL AN EXPERT AT, SO PLEASE I'LL BE REALLY GLAD TO BE CORRECTED IF THERE WERE EITHER CONCEPTUAL OR FACTUAL MISTAKES. AND TRUST ME, SOME OF YOU WILL DEFINITELY CLOSE THIS PAGE IMMEDIATELY FOR YOU THINK WHAT I WROTE IS NONSENSICAL BULLSHITS YOU DON'T REALLY GIVE A FUCK AT, BUT TRUST ME, THESE SUCH BULLSHITS LIKE POLITIC, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMY ARE INTERESTING AND NOT THAT HARD TO LEARN, ALTHOUGH IT IS THAT HARD TO COMPREHEND (?)So, the controversial Donald Trump has officially won the president election at 9th of November 2016. Many have been analyzing how could such thing occur, and still trying to look for Trump's flaws, nonetheless he already won, and i'm one of the non-experts who knows no shit who tries to do both.

27 August 2016

Wait, brace yourself. I named this post Voting Flaws #2 yet i don't know whether or not the materials are still relevant, but... yeah you know it's my blog, so fuck it aight.

Now, as what i've written in the previous post, as i can recall, i wrote that our ideology is the root of the problem, now i think i'm gonna elaborate that sentence first in this post before i ever try to explain anything about a new system (since i haven't had it anyway).

26 June 2016

So of course these thoughts came from Brexit referendum a couple days ago and i think the flaws of voting system are placed in the pre event.

Well here are some questions regarding the condition of pre voting, don't we need to know the capacity of the individuals who are going to take the vote? Don't we need to make sure that everyone is seeing the case through the same scope of analysis? Don't we need to make sure that naivety won't win for everything about it will lead into consequences?