December 1, 2010

Ready to fight back?

Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week.

You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Support Progressive Journalism

The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.

Fight Back!

Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week.

You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Travel With The Nation

Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.

Sign up for our Wine Club today.

Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?

So far, WikiLeaks have concentrated their efforts on US foreign policy, from wars to diplomacy. Though little concrete action appears to have been taken in response to the leaks, their next target may spark a different reaction.

But we already know there’s been plenty of mismanagement and even fraud on Wall Street, so what could Assange have on the bank that we don’t already know? Given their shameless theft of US assets, what could possibly embarrass them?

Maybe, however, it’s not about what happens after but what happens before WikiLeaks leaks. Ritholtz noted that maybe this is just about "shaking the tree—disturbing the status quo." And Assange has written plenty himself on the subject.

In one essay, Assange notes: "The more secretive or unjust an organization is, the more leaks induce fear and paranoia in its leadership and planning coterie."

So perhaps when we look for action to be taken as a result of the WikiLeaks, we’re looking for the wrong thing. Instead, maybe what we’re looking at is a long-term attempt to provoke a response that reveals the dysfunction within our most powerful institutions and possibly derails it by provoking an over-reaction.

Think lunch-counter sit-ins, updated. If Assange’s cyber invasion is to Bankster Street what the civil rights marchers were to segregation, what are Wall Street’s water cannons? And will they end up, by their reaction, shooting themselves in the foot?

I can hardly wait to find out.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv and editor of At The Tea Party, out now from OR Books. GRITtv broadcasts weekdays on DISH Network and DIRECTv, on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter and be our friend on Facebook.

Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.