How do you just throw out food and water like that? At least Hungary has some balls.

Quote

“Everything which is now taking place before our eyes threatens to have explosive consequences for the whole of Europe,” Orbán wrote in Germany’s Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. “Europe’s response is madness. We must acknowledge that the European Union’s misguided immigration policy is responsible for this situation.

Germany could see as many as 800,000 migrants arriving this year - four times the number from last year, the country's interior minister has said, citing current trends as a signal for the drastic increase.

What I don't understand is that so many people who are for this massive boom of immigration also seem to hate their own culture. In Sweden a major news paper even published an article called, "Is Swedish culture worth keeping?".Whats so bad about European culture, and whats better with a culture where woman are far beneath men on the social ladder, or where homosexuals are shunned because they love someone with the same gender? Those views are so intolerant, why do you want it into your community?Why should we just give and give while never demanding something back? Isn't it okay to demand that they adapt to us, the host country, the country they felt are better than the one they left, instead of trying to change us to them?And people say, "don't generalise, most of them are cool," and sure thats true, when things go as they want. Does anyone remember what happened when Salman Rushdie wrote The Satanic Verses? It was major uproars in the UK and in other parts of Europe. Have you all forgotten what happens when magazines prints certain cartoons? And I'm not just talking about Charlie Hebdo, there has been incidents before also, where people haven't been killed, but still violent protests.The people who are coming are very vocal, and often violent over things that shouldn't matter, at least not in the civilised world. You can say that multiculturalism is good, but that depends on the cultures you mix, and western culture does not blend well with Islamic culture. When so many people come at once, you're bound to have a culture clash, and that will lead to riots, both started by the natives and the immigrants. And you're going to get fractions inside the different groups as well. Right now it seems like either you are pro immigration, or you will be labeled a right wing neo nazi extremist. Why are you who are pro immigration the superior moralists, while we who want less are evil? There is nothing moral about ruining your own societies. How is it morally correct to import people who hate your way of life? How is it morally correct towards women who will not be able to feel as safe anymore?As of right now Europe as a lot of other problems, internal problems that we should try to fix. We have a huge number of young people who can't find jobs: http://www.statista.com/statistics/266228/youth-unemployment-rate-in-eu-countries/Maybe we should try and help those? Aren't they supposed to be the future of Europe? And lets talk about the fact that many, if not most of the European countries have a boom of elderly people needing aid and assistance, people who have worked their entire lives and paid taxed, many of them who are being treated like shit because "We can't afford better care," its a slap in the face to them spending billions on immigration.We can help those who need help for a fraction of the cost in their native countries. But I know, suggesting something like that is extremely inhumane and makes me literally Hitler.Could we at least put it to a vote? Aren't most European countries democracies? In fact, one party in my country suggested it and was ridiculed. Think about it, the media, and the opposing parties ridiculed a party for wanting a democratic process in a 'democratic' country.So far all I hear is, we have to help we have to help, I'm not hearing anyone coming up with answers to how this 'experiment' will turn out. When people are so tolerant that they tolerate intolerance, its reasonable to be upset. Because thats what a lot of people are doing right now.

A decent post made by a Redditor! To bad the mods of r/worldnews culled the whole thread talking about these refugees.

This is currently causing such a rift in my country and in europe as a whole, it'd be amazing to watch if the personal consequences weren't so terrifying. The goal of the government is clear, bolster the dwindling population numbers. Also the industry shows interest in the cheap and probably very compliant labor. It's crazy that many don't seem to think that this will have any long-term social and cultural consequences and implications, especially since we're already able to see examples of this. (honest hate here though: lots of people will end up being sent back, too - I'm afraid just not nearly enough)

Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait have taken 0 refugees. (Or some classified in other ways)

Quote

"They are worried about disturbing their maybe delicate socio-economic demographics. When they enter any country, they will bring with them all the reasons of why they left Syria," Khatteeb said. "The whole political system does not cater to allowing waves of refugees."

Yet, it only now occurred to me that there is a place that would be ideal for Syrian refugees. I’ve never heard it discussed in the press as a natural refuge for Syrians, but:

- It has great views.

- It has a lovely sunny climate

- Yet the temperatures are mild and there is good rainfall for agriculture due to the moderately high altitude (about 1,000 meters on average).

- This place even has a ski resort! (It doesn’t, however, seem to have any golf courses, but as the picture at the top shows, it has lots of rolling open land ideal for golf.)

- It’s quite under-populated relative to its carrying capacity. It’s hard to find exact numbers, but this region appears to be about 500 square miles in size with a present day population of somewhere around 40,000.

- The population today seems to be less than half of what it was a half century ago.

- It’s conveniently, even extremely close to Syria.

- And yet, this region is an island of peace and law & order under a strong, sophisticated government in a state with a prosperous economy.

- If there is any government in the world hardnosed enough to keep Syrian Sunnis and Shi’ites from killing each other, it’s this government.

- In fact, a fair number of Syrians are descended from people who used to live there. Some of the middle-aged and elderly Syrian refugees even lived here themselves before being driven out.

- Indeed, this place is still recognized as Syria’s own national territory by almost all the countries of the world.

Golan Heights

Quote

The sophisticated reasoning of 2015 is that if you and your countrymen blow up your own country through your sheer mutual bloodymindedness, you therefore have an unassailable moral claim to inhabit the nicest countries on other continents. If you are a young fellow in your prime, why should you have to settle for a refugee camp in neighboring Turkey when there are Swedish girls unmolested in Malmo and English girls unpimped in Rotherham?

theres this BS only 25% of migrants are economic. When you get to a non civil war country like turkey, greece, etc you are an asylum seeker. If you go further you are 100% an economic migrant. Theres people fleeing fucking france to go to the UK because the gimmes are less dried up there. Same deal for Germany.

A fucking men. If European leaders were actually trying to protect refugees and not flood the country, they would copy Australia's policy:

Poztralia has the same issues as Europe is having 5 years ago. Tons of third-world hordes sailing in on boats, and whiny shitlibs demanding that they be settled. The response? Put them all in camps in Papua New Guina and Nauru.

Anyone who doesn't agree with this policy is acting in bad faith. If someone is a genuine asylum seeker fleeing unbearable conditions, then they should be perfectly fine being house where-ever to escape the mistreatment. If they demand settlement in a first-world country, they are just trying to get those gibmedats.

People who insist that these camps are no good, and that these migrants need be settled in normal towns in first-world countries are just trying to replace the native population. They are either ignorant, or committing treason honestly. Absolutely sickening, and a sane society would not tolerate the shreaking from those idiots.

Logged

White folks was in the caves while we was building empires!

We built pyramids before Donald Trump even knew what architecture was…

We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it

Seems to me like the great question of our time will not be about terrorism but ultimately about multiculturalism and immigration. Clearly the elites seem more in favor of immigration but the popularity of certain political groups such as UKIP and the Front National along with Trump show that the silent majority are starting to be less enthusiastic about unchecked immigration.

Terrorism and war will simply hasten the current migrations since it provides a good excuse for economic migrants and the media (kikes) cozying up to the elite tries to sell the concept to the proles but the general population are starting to see through the bullshit.

The only ones "subverting" the forum here are the swole cru/wn/alt rightards who, by their own admission, want to change this forum from what it was, was intended to be, and what the former and current owners want it to be.

One of the more worrying things about this all is when it ends up being a complete and total fucking disaster, nobody will have learned anything.

People are learning, as we see with the rise of anti-immigration parties in Europe. The issue is that people learned about 20 years too late. Bringing on Turks or Moroccans in the 60s/70s were handled much better than 2000/2010s. The reason is that there was greater pressure to assimilate with the former and the latter is thoroughly steeped in poz.

OK, why did the media choose to refer to them as migrants instead of asylum seekers or refugees?The BBC has now started putting up a disclaimer saying they use the term to include the above, as well as people who are just looking for a better quality of life or a job.

The whole thing wouldn't bother me if laws were followed and these people went through the process of registration, but the self-entitlement of 'I'M GOING TO GERMANY!!!' is pissing me off. A refugee camp in Europe is better than one in Turkey or Syria no?

The only ones "subverting" the forum here are the swole cru/wn/alt rightards who, by their own admission, want to change this forum from what it was, was intended to be, and what the former and current owners want it to be.

Chancellor Angela Merkel has said the "breathtaking" flow of migrants into Germany will "occupy and change" the country in the coming years.She said Germany would speed up asylum procedures and build extra housing, but called on other EU states to help.French President Francois Hollande said quotas for EU countries to relocate 120,000 migrants were being planned and that France would take 24,000.Meanwhile, the flow of migrants across Europe shows no sign of easing.

It's like they read the shemitah and blood moon stuff and decided to run with it.