Overview: We experimentally compare two modes of in-service professional development for South African public primary school teachers. In both programs teachers receive the same scripted lesson plans, aligned to the official literacy curriculum. Pupils exposed to two years of the program improved their reading proficiency by 0.12 standard deviations if their teachers received centralized Training, compared to 0.24 if their teachers received in-class Coaching. Classroom observations reveal that teachers were more likely to split pupils into smaller reading groups, which enabled individualized attention and more opportunities to practice reading. Results vary by class size and baseline pupil reading proficiency.

The information provided on this Web site is not official U.S. Government information and does not represent the views or positions of the U.S. Agency for International Development or the U.S. Government. This Web site is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID - contract number AID-OAA-M-14-00007) and the contents of this Web site are the sole responsibility of Education Development Center, Inc. USAID Education in Crisis and Conflict Network (ECCN) is implemented by Education Development Center, Inc.