Friday, January 27, 2017

Bernard Crowe was called as a witness by the prosecution in the penalty phase of the TLB trial. The purpose was to show that Charles Manson was capable committing a violent act that could potentially result in the death of another. In fact Manson did believe that he had killed Crowe at the time he shot him.

Vincent Bugliosi relates in his book Helter Skelter, Part 5 titled "Don't You Know Who You're Crucifying? March 1970" that it was by chance that Manson discovered that he had not actually killed Crowe when the two passed each other in a hallway at either the Hall of Justice or perhaps the LA County jail.

Bugliosi says in the last paragraph that Crowe had been "jailed on a marijuana charge." While doing further research into Crowe I discovered that he was not jailed for a marijuana charge but rather burglary and forgery charges. He was involved with three other people in what was said to be a "$250,000 forgery and burglary ring." To put it into perspective that amount of money in 1970 would be worth a whopping $1,555,109.54 today. Crowe's forgery endeavors were no small potatoes and much more lucrative that what Crowe could have made dealing kilos of marijuana.

Cielodrive provided me with the trial transcripts of Crowe's testimony. I wanted to see what, if anything, was said about the burglary and forgery charges against Crowe or if they had any bearing on his testimony in the penalty phase of the trial. Bugliosi questioned Crowe first and nothing was said about the charges. When it came time for Irving Kanarak, Manson's attorney, to question Crowe it is apparent that Kanarak knew about the charges but due to his ham handed style of lawyering he was not able to present questions to Crowe about the incident in a manner that satisfied the court or prosecutor Bugliosi.

Kanarak broached the subject by asking Crowe if in May of 1970 or earlier that year if he had been charged with forging the seal of the State of California. Objections by Bugliosi ensued and counsel was asked to approach the bench so the matter could be discussed out of the jury's hearing.

This line of questions and objections goes on for pages. What Kanarak seemed to be trying to get at was whether or not Crowe was going to be given leniency or perhaps dismissal of the charges pending against him for his testimony. Bugliosi objected at every turn. Crowe tried to invoke his fifth amendment rights a few times. The judge has him answer a time or two but in the end I think the jury is left with the impression Crowe was arrested for something, they know not what except that it might have involved the Great Seal of the State of California, and he may or may not be relieved of those charges for his testimony.

The question for me was why, in his book, did Bugliosi misrepresent the charges that Crowe was facing when he had that chance meeting in the hallway with Manson? The book came out about three years after all was said and done. There had been testimony that Crowe was facing criminal charges though the jury never quite knew what those charges were.

I drafted all of the above in this post before this post by Dreath was published. Comments made in that post had me rethink a couple of things. Col Scott said that Bryn/Bryan Lukashevsky was present at the Crowe shooting. I could not find any evidence of that in the court testimony where Crowe named the people who were present.

I looked for and found an LA Times article that recounted the day's testimony to see what was reported. I noticed that the person named Steve in the court transcripts of Crowe's testimony had quotes around his name in the newspaper article as if that was not his true name. The person named Del in the transcripts did not have quotes in the newspaper, neither did Rosina or Manson. However T.J. does have quotes around his name and we know T.J. was Thomas Walleman's nick name.

I contacted Dreath to ask if it was possible the court would allow the use of an alternate name in testimony and he told me it was highly unlikely. It is done when minors are involved and if there was some legitimate reason to do so for an adult the name used would be "John Doe".

Manson took "Steve's" shirt after shooting Crowe. I think if "Steve" were Bryn, Manson would have looked like he was wearing a dress if he wore the shirt. Manson was 5'2" and Lukashevsky was 6'1".

Also, the reporter seems to think that the charges pending against Crowe were drug charges. The jury likely had that impression, too.

There was no question that Manson shot Crowe, no one denied it, not even Charlie. The point of Crowe's testifying was to show that Manson was capable of violence that could result in murder. Why did Bugliosi write something that was definitely not true and in court suppress the true charges that Crowe was facing?

I am completely blown away that the date of the Crowe shooting was misrepresented in court, too.﻿

Monday, January 23, 2017

“In the late spring of 1968, Wilson had twice picked up the
same pair of female hitchhikers while driving through Malibu. The second time
he took the girls home with him. For Dennis, home was 14400 Sunset Boulevard, a
palatial residence formerly owned by humorist Will Rogers. The girls— Ella Jo
Bailey and Patricia Krenwinkel— stayed a couple of hours, Dennis said, mostly
talking about this guy named Charlie. Wilson had a recording session that night
and didn’t get home until 3 A.M. When he pulled into the driveway, a strange
man stepped out of his back door. Wilson, frightened, asked, “Are you going to
hurtme?” The man said, “Do I look like
I’m going to hurt you, brother?” He then dropped to his knees and kissed
Wilson’s feet— obviously one of Charlie’s favorite routines. When Manson
ushered Wilson into his own home, he discovered he had about a dozen uninvited
house guests, nearly all of them girls. They stayed for several months, during
which time the group more than doubled in number. (It was during Manson’s
“Sunset Boulevard period” that Charles “Tex” Watson, Brooks Poston, and Paul
Watkins became associated with the Family.)

The experience, Dennis later estimated, cost him about$ 100,000. Besides Manson’s constantly
hitting him for money, Clem demolished Wilson’s uninsured $ 21,000
Mercedes-Benz** by plowing it into a mountain on the approach to Spahn Ranch; the
Family appropriated Wilson’s wardrobe, and just about everything else in sight;
and several times Wilson found it necessary to take the whole Family to his
Beverly Hills doctor for penicillin shots. “It was probably the largest
gonorrhea bill in history,” Dennis admitted. Wilson even gave Manson nine or
ten of the Beach Boys’ gold records and paid to have Sadie’s teeth fixed.

[** It actually was a 1966, Ferrari GTB/6C, silver grey, vin # 08501GT, California tag #VAM559, like the one pictured top, right. One site claims the second picture is the car after the wreck. I can't verify that.]

*****

However, in August 1968, three weeks before his lease was to
expire, Dennis moved in with Gregg [Jakobson], leaving to his manager the task
of evicting Charlie and the girls.

From Sunset Boulevard the Family moved to Spahn Ranch.
Although Wilson apparently avoided the group for a time, he did see Manson
occasionally.”

I have even heard it explained that Wilson left his Sunset
Boulevard residence because he was afraid of Manson. After they split company
by the official accounts Wilson had very little contact with the Family except
for three occasions when Bugliosi says either Wilson or Jakobson told him
Wilson had been threatened.

But that may not be completely accurate…..

In the December 21, 1968 British publication The Record
Mirror a story appeared about Dennis Wilson. It briefly mentions Manson and the
Family, “Dennis Wilson: I Live With 17 Girls” by David Griffiths. It can be
found, here.

One interesting aspect of the article is the quote
attributed to Wilson that seems to suggest that he was having an ongoing
relationship with Manson in December, 1968.

“I live in the woods in California near Death Valley with 17
girls.”

The Death Valley reference is at least interesting as that
is far from Sunset Boulevard.

Wilson also appears to mention his lodgings with Greg
Jakobson:

“Now I live in one small room with one candle and I’m happy,
finding myself.”

Given the ‘present tense’ language used by Wilson (that he
‘is’ living with 17 girls) and given the official timeline the only time the
interview logically should have taken place was sometime between say
late May and early August 1968, the timeframe when Wilson was officially connected to the Family. Then the explanation for the use of present tense might be simply that the interview wasn’t
published until December.

The problem is that during that timeframe Wilson was not in
England. While the Beach Boys toured during the period they never left the
United States. ‘Never Learn Not to Love’ was not recorded until September
11-18, again, after Wilson allegedly broke with Manson.

From the same source (ESQ) Wilson et al were in England (and
on the Continent) in December 1968. They were specifically in London on
December 1st, 8th and 18th and were in England
from December 1st to the 8th returning on the 18th.
It appears, then, that at least the logical conclusion is that Wilson gave the
interview during one of the December dates when he was in London in December
1968.

But then why use the present tense language if he split with Manson in August ’68?

It is arguable that the reference is misquoted. Wilson may
have been talking of ‘back then’ and the author may have simply turned them to
the present tense to sell the story, especially since the band was touring
England.

But why did that happen three times?

The December ’68 story is not the only time after August '68 when Wilson proclaims
his present tense friendship with Manson or that he is living with the Family.

The Beach Boys started their 5th European Tour on
May 30, 1969. They toured with Paul Revere and the Raiders and Joe Hicks from
May 30th until June 22nd.

They were in London on May 31st and June 22nd.
They were at other locations in England and Scotland June 6-9th.

In May 1969 this article appeared in Rave magazine, a London
based pop magazine.

The Beach Boys
concert in Berlin, mentioned in the article occurred on May 14th
which means this interview could have occurred when the Beach Boys were in
London on either May 31st or June 22nd.

But that isn’t
all. Lon Goddard for the Record Mirror (again) caught up with Wilson for an article
that appeared July 5, 1969.

Wilson in both
articals from 1969 refers to his ongoing relationship with Manson and the
Family and even suggests he is living with the Family at Spahn Ranch During May-June ‘69. The
question is ‘why’?

I think one
answer is that Wilson was still interacting with Manson in May-June 1969. From
ESQ you can see that he didn’t have a lot of time between August ’68 and July
’69 to be in Los Angeles but that could have allowed him to live a day here and
there in a room at Jakobson’s and at Spahn.

If that is the case then where did the official story come
from?

I think it might have to do with some old-fashioned PR 'damage control'. While
their career was ‘fading’ in 1969 the Beach Boys were still one of the top
bands (mostly on reputation). They also had, even with the drugs, more of a
‘good boy’ persona. Having Dennis hanging around Spahn Ranch a month before the
murders, it seems to me, would not have been very good PR. Remember, after the
murders in late August or early September Manson went looking for Wilson to get
money (the bullet visit) which may suggest at least Manson still thought there
was a relationship there. Since he did ‘abandon his home’ in August ’68 it
would be easy to say ‘at that point I split from them’.

It also provides an excuse to not testify. If Wilson was
close to Manson in May-June ’69 I think Bugliosi would have been even more
eager to interview him. Backing his exit up to August ’68 and refusing to
testify drops Wilson down Bugliosi’s witness list to ‘unnecessary’. He had
Jakobson and Melcher to fill all that in. Dennis is off the hook and the band
is out of the headlines.

That also made me wonder what might have scared Wilson away
shortly after the May- June '69 interviews.

[An old law school professor of mine used to have a saying
about innacurate or false testimony: “you will find that with some witnesses misstatements or lies are as numerous as the grains of sand on a beach but remember there is
always a grain of truth there somewhere.” ]

And that led me to the Mike Love story.

Wilson
allegedly told Love: "I just saw Charlie take his M16 and blow this black
cat [man] in half and stuff him down the well."

We
know this never happened. But we also know that on August 1, 1969 Manson
confronted and shot Bernard Crowe, a “black cat”. We also know Manson thought
Crowe was dead. Could the Love statement be Dennis embelishing a story he heard
while at Spahn? Or perhaps it was Mike Love embellishing a story Dennis embellished
that also got garbled after 45 years.

Wouldn’t the delivery of a bullet to Jakobson for Wilson be a far more effective as a threat if Wilson knew that
Manson had shot a ‘black cat’?

The timing, at least, is interesting.

There is a reference to the possibility Wilson was still
entangled with Manson in Helter Skelter. While discussing the murder of Darwin
Scott Bugliosi says this:

“On May 22, 1969, Manson telephoned his parole officer,
Samuel Barrett, requesting permission to travel to Texas with the Beach Boys.
Permission was withheld pending verification of Manson’s employment with the
group. In a letter dated May 27, the same day as Scott’s murder, Manson said
that the group had left without him and that he had moved from Death Valley
back to Spahn Ranch. To categorize Barrett’s control over Manson as minimal
would be an exaggeration. Barrett did not again talk to Manson until June 18.

Barrett did not note the postmark on the letter. He did note
that he didn’t receive it until June 3, seven days after it was supposedly
written. It is possible that Manson was using the letter as an alibi; it is
also possible that he sent one of his killers to murder Scott. But both
possibilities are strictly conjecture. The murder of Darwin Scott also remains
unsolved.”

However, a check of esquarterly.com reveals there was
no tour of Texas in May 1969. There was a tour of Oklahoma and a couple
appearances in nearby states earlier in May 1969 but these predate May 22nd.
In fact the first tour date after May 22nd is the European tour.

This contact with Barrett is one of the small curiosities of
this case. Barrett likely was referring to his file so his information would
have been from that file. He might have noted the wrong location for the tour (Texas instead of Europe) but that seems like a strange mistake.

It could also mean Manson lied to Barrett claiming to have
such a ‘gig’ and then dropped the request when Barrett asked for verification. Manson
may have thought he could pull a fast one: get permission for Texas and just go
to England. But Manson would need a passport and while a convicted felon can
get a passport there is no evidence I have found that he had one and getting
one on a few days’ notice is impossible. On the other hand he may have made up the story to get permission to go to Texas but why would Manson
want to go to Texas in May, 1969.

Regardless, it does appear to me that Dennis Wilson didn’t
sever his connection to Manson and the Family until early July 1969 (or perhaps
even later since the 'bullet visit is late August or early September '69).

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Both George and I had travels through the Metroplex within a month of each other. My foray to Copeville was only for an afternoon. George had the good fortune to be able to spend more time. The first part of this post is mine. The majority is George. Hope you enjoy it:

Matt

In October I was in Austin, Texas on business. As long as I was there I decided to make a side trip to Copeville to check out the Watson homestead. From Dallas you can make it in about a half hour or so. I did so with a heavy heart as it was the day after learning of our own Robert Hendrickson's death.

I was met there by my friends Cielo and Tom H. Most of you know of Cielo from his top-notch TLB site cielodrive.com. Tom H has been a silent contributor to the blog over time and is well versed in TLB, Tex Watson and the East Texas area surrounding Copeville. There have been a few times during my TLB-related journeys when in retrospect I wished we had had a video camera recording the conversation. One of those was that day in Copeville outside a convenience store, leaning against cars while Cielo explained all of the tribulations, government stalling and doublespeak surrounding the Tex Tapes. Tom talked about the area's history, the Watson/Montgomery families and Collin County. It was a terrific hour or so...

We checked out the house:

I was surprised to see that the house is occupied. There were children's toys lying around and kittens pouncing about. It's much smaller than I had anticipated. Really small for the family of five that were the Watsons.

The building that served as Denton Watson's gas station/grocery store is locked up. The pumps are gone and grass grows through the cracked & broken concrete. There is a security fence surrounding the rear portion of the former store and the metal building adjacent to it. Inside the fence was a large dog. We could hear music coming from within the metal building, but no one responded to our knocks. It was a tad spooky.

Tom says that the street was once a happening place with cafes, stores and other businesses. Copeville is surrounded still to this day by thousands of square miles of farm land. Farm vehicles roll slowly on the streets and everyone you pass gives that forefinger salutation from the steering wheel.

Copeville is located in Collin County. The county seat of which is McKinney, where Watson was held while fighting extradition to California. When he was arrested, his second cousin Tom Montgomery was the County Sheriff. Another cousin, Bob King was the jailer who oversaw him for nine months. Mr. King is still alive and was recently interviewed by Tom H. Here is the sound file. Nothing earth shattering but it's another piece of the story that's now documented. Enjoy:

George

Inspired by Matt's post above about his recent trip
to Copeville, Texas I decided to visit some locales relevant to Charles
"Tex" Watson's life in the area on my own during a Thanksgiving-time
trip to Dallas.

The
first place I stopped was at the Thompson Cemetery in Lavon, Texas.
This is the final resting place of Watson's parents, Clarence Denton and
Mary Elizabeth Watson. I was really surprised by what I found there.
Rose bushes have been planted by the graves in such a way as to almost
totally obscure the two headstones on them. No other graves in the
800-plus graves cemetery had such a landscaping feature, and I've never
seen such an arrangement at any other grave in any other cemetery. I can
only speculate on what the presence of the bushes means, but it's
almost like the parents didn't want to be found and recognized in death.

The Thompson Cemetery in Lavon, Texas

The
names of the families buried in the cemetery have been rendered in the
metal fencing surrounding it. Charles Watson's parents are the only two
Watsons buried there, although there are numerous Montgomeries (Mary
Watson's family). The parents' grave site is visible left of center.

Rose bushes have been planted in front of the graves,

almost totally blocking the names on the headstones.

Another view of the rose bush planting

Looking back towards Texas Highway 78

You can only read the headstones by approaching them from the far side

and reading them upside down.

Charles "Tex" Watson and his parents during a post-conviction prison visit, from

Will You Die For Me? His father looks very pained.

Water tower near Copeville

The
next place I went was to the Copeville Community Methodist Church, the
site of Watson's early religious training. As we poked around the
property, took pictures, and tried the locked front door, a Collin
County sheriff's deputy pulled up and parked in an adjacent parking lot.
But just as I was going over to him to introduce myself he drove away.

Above, the Copeville Community Methodist Church as pictured in Will You Die For Me?

Below, the church today

A painted rock on the front stoop of the church

The church is within easy view and walking distance of the former Watson residence and gas station.

View from the church to the former Watson home and gas station/store

The Watson gas station/store in December, 1969 (Thank you Tom H.!)

"By late the next day [after Watson's arrest],
the story had hit the wire services, reporters had started calling my
parents at home, and photographers and newspeople were descending on
McKinney in droves. My parents had to fight their way through a large
crowd to get into the jail.

"It
was front-page news. Los Angeles Police Chief Edward Davis gave a press
conference to announce that warrants had been issued for the arrest of
Patricia Krenwinkel, Linda Kasabian, and Charles Watson (Charlie, Susan
and Leslie would be named later) for the murders of Sharon Tate, Jay
Sebring, Abigail Folger, Voytek Frykowski, Steven Parent, Rosemary
LaBianca and Leno LaBianca. He told the two hundred reporters from
around the world that the crime of the decade had been solved.

"A few days later my father painted over the WATSON on the front of the store he'd taken half a lifetime to build." -- Charles Watson in Will You Die For Me?

The gas station area today

View from the gas station area to the church

The Watson house in Will You Die For Me?

The Watson house today. The front door was ajar, but I didn't knock.

(Notice how much the tree in the front yard has grown.)

Watson
attended high school in Farmersville, just under eight miles to the
north. Farmersville High is where Watson's infamous theft of four
typewriters occurred during a fraternity initiation when he attended the
North Texas State University in Denton, Texas, another 20 miles to the
west. I knew that the old high school had been completely torn down, so I
made no effort to locate or photograph the new school. But I did want
to see what the town and surrounding countryside looked like, so we went
through there on the way to McKinney. On the way we passed Lavon Lake.
Watson took a girl there for an afternoon of recreation on the day that
he was arrested for the Tate/LaBianca murders.

Lavon Lake near Copeville, where Watson spent his last hours of freedom

"On
November 30, I took a drive with my rediscovered girl friend. We had a
quiet day at a nearby lake, sitting on a blanket, talking. For some
reason, I felt I could relax around her, and we even wove fantasy plans
of running away to Northern California together. She was very bored with
Texas, and California had the same allure for her it had once held - it
seemed like an eternity ago - for me. It almost seemed possible that there might be a future.

"When
I got home that afternoon, my father and my mother's brother, Maurice
Montgomery, were waiting for me. As soon as I walked into the dim, musty
light of the store and saw the two of them together, my father's
weathered face staring at me in pain and disbelief, I knew what had
happened. The running was over." -- Charles Watson in Will You Die For Me?

The approach to Farmersville from Copeville

Although there is much post-1969 sprawl in greater Farmersville the downtown hasn't

changed much from when Watson attended high school in the town.

The closed movie theater features movie posters from the town's favorite son,

World War Two hero and B movie star Audie Murphy.

After Watson's arrest he was taken to the county seat of Collin County, McKinney, where he was housed in the old county prison.

The Collin County Prison, where Watson was held during his fight against extradition to California

"When
we got to the sheriff's office in the big stone jail, just off the main
square where the Collin County Courthouse punctuates the low-slung
town, my second cousin, County Sheriff Tom Montgomery, called California
again for more information but was told nothing except that I was to be
held until Los Angeles detectives got to McKinney and that I was
dangerous. As he led me to a cell with an embarrassed, apologetic
grin, my cousin Tom said, “I think we'll be able to clear all this up
quick enough. We know for sure you didn't commit no murder.” I walked
into the cell without answering him." -- Charles Watson in Will You Die For Me?

Plaque on the old Collin County Prison

The building has been completely remodeled inside to accommodate an accounting firm,

Watson
successfully fought extradition to California for nine months. He
attended his legal proceeding in McKinney at the courthouse in the
center of the old town square.

The old Collin County Courthouse. It now houses the local Center for Performing Arts.

Although artwork now decorates the interior, the building still has very much of a courthouse feel.

Sign indicating the way to the former courtroom, now converted into a theater

The courtroom/theater today, complete with segregation-era balcony al la To Kill A Mockingbird.

A theater troupe was having a rehearsal while we were there.

Charles
Watson also spent several years in Denton, Texas, attending the North
Texas State University. While there he tooled around in a 1966 Dodge
Coronet 600 until he totaled it while running a yellow light during one
of his nightlife forays into Dallas.

A 1966 Dodge Coronet 600

Watson
had hoped to pledge the Epsilon Delta chapter of the Pi Kappa Alpha
fraternity at NTSU when he stole the typewriters from Farmersville High.
Fate intervened however (he got caught) and he never made it into the
frat. Today PKA still has a chapter at the former North Texas State
University (now called the University of North Texas). The fraternity's
website declares that "Pi Kappa Alpha’s members at the University of
North Texas strive to be Scholars, Leaders, Athletes, and Gentlemen, and
they seek excellence in everything they do." "Tex" Watson certainly
excelled at what he did.

I was
not able to determine whether PKA currently had a frat house, so we
didn't drive the additional 30-some miles from McKinney to Denton to
check it out.