Second explosion seen at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013. Explosion looks as if it is coming from inside storefront out towards street.

On April 15, 2013, two small explosions were set off near the finish line at the Boston Marathon. The day was Tax Day and also Patriots Day.

On April 18, the FBI stated they had surveillance video of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev placing his bag with the pressure cooker bomb on the street. Yet we see no evidence of this. We were told in the same press conference that the Tsarnaev brothers were hanging out together and speaking with each other the day of the bombings on the Boston streets. We still see no evidence of this.

In the video shown to the public of the Tsarnaev brothers walking on the sidewalk, we see three people with blurred faces, however, all other faces of people are not blurred. Why did the FBI blur out certain faces and not others? Looking at the surveillance video, in the first half, we see a man put what looked like an earpiece into his ear and cover his month as if he was speaking to other agents or operatives in a covert operation.

Then, at another glance at the same video, we see a woman holding three bright yellow balloons. Where these balloons used as a marker for agents and operatives to know where the two brothers were on the street? These balloons would also be a perfect way for the brothers to be found in the thousands of videos and pictures I’m sure the FBI called for in a public announcement.

Furthermore, if the brothers did place the bombs, why would they be near the blast zone and found fleeing close-by? How did the brothers detonate the bombs? Why has not the FBI come forth with information showing receipts and purchases of the bombing making materials?

With no evidence of the Tsarnaev brothers placing the bombs, how can we really believe the U.S. government as telling the truth?

For what we know, these two young men were patsies. True, they probably were Islamic and had some radicalized “mentors” that we do not know about (Today News). Or maybe their real mentors were FBI agents?

The Chase on April 19:

By synchronizing the facts of the events that unfolded on April 19, we can see that the Boston law enforcement and FBI were not forthcoming with what actually happened in Watertown, MA. Allegedly, the Tsarnaev brothers were in the process of fleeing Boston and shot and killed a MIT police officer out of anxiety, thinking that the MIT officer was on the phone and calling in that he had found the two brothers (this shooting was not first linked to the brothers). Then they were found in Waterton, MA robbing a 7-Eleven mart for money because the FBI said that their handlers had not given them any money. It has come forth that 7-Eleven does not have surveillance video of the robbery. Yeah, when does a quickie mart not have surveillance video of a robbery?

Next, the police found the brothers in a chase in a Watertown residential area where there was a large amount of gunfire and the brothers continued to drop pressure cooker bombs from a stolen vehicle. Watertown police chief Edward Deveau came out to say that as Tsarnaev was being handcuffed on the ground, the younger brother drove over the older brother to flee the scene (another lie from the police). Somehow the younger brother is able to evade police and hide himself in a boat in the backyard of a homeowner. As the story goes, the homeowner found blood on the boat and went to investigate and looked inside and saw Dzhokhar. The homeowner did not say anything to Dzhokhar and ran to call police. Do you still believe this story?

Then, once police and SWAT arrive on scene, they drive a SWAT armored carrier up to the boat and police fire tens of rounds into the boat. Dzhokhar only survives by hiding low behind the engine compartment. Over the loud speaker the police call for Dzhokhar to turn himself in and at this moment Dzhokhar shoots himself in the mouth but he should have died. But the bullet missed the mouth and went out the side of the throat. Then, bleeding from the throat for 20 hours (which he should have bled to death), Dzhokhar under his own power, lifts himself up and out of the boat to turn himself in. The authorities have convinced the media that Dzhokhar cannot speak and may never be able to speak again because of the throat injury, how convenient!

I can tell you that most of this story is false. It obvious and follows almost like a movie script pattern like the Sandy Hook incident. A week after this incident, law enforcement admitted that Dzhokhar was unarmed in the 20 hour chase, including unarmed in the boat (The Washington Post). The police had no right to continue to shoot an unarmed victim no matter what heinous crime he may have committed. Every U.S. citizen has the right to the 4th , 5th and 6th Amendments.

Dzhokhar never ran over his brother as a police officer was handcuffing Tamerlan. That is absurd. What police officer would try to handcuff a suspect on the ground when a second suspect is still in control of a vehicle? Witnesses have come forth to challenge this narrative and saw a law enforcement SUV run over Tsarnaev and then police shot him while he lay on the ground.

The authorities have never clarified who the driver of the vehicle was. His role still does not make sense. He drove his own vehicle that the brothers stole yet the brothers did not kill him. They had no problem setting a few bombs at a marathon to kill 3 people and injure over 170 people yet did not have the hatred to kill one man?

Allegedly Dzhokhar Tsarnaev drove his Mercedes SUV towards two police vehicles and sped between them on April 18, 2013.

So if the brothers stole the Mercedes SUV at a 7-Eleven, who’s green Jaguar sedan is it in the street as seen in the pictures during the shootout in the street? The younger brother clearly drove the Mercedes SUV towards the police vehicles in the photos. Where was the driver of the stolen vehicle at this time? Did the driver remain in the vehicle during the gunfight in the street?

The green Jaguar is directly in front of the Mercedes SUV. The car had been driven, lights on and the doors opened. Should we assume that the night chase included two vehicles and more than two suspects? Only the engines of the vehicles provide cover, maximum concealment from the bullets.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev seen firing a handgun as he and his younger brother find cover behind a Mercedes SUV in Watertown on April 18, 2013.

As shown in witness Andrew Kitzenberg’s images from Getonhand.com, Dzhokhar (or someone) drove the SUV down the street and between the cop cars. But at which point did he run over his brother? The witness never confirms the police report that Dzhokhar drove over his brother.

And how did Tamerlan walk towards police and why did he do so? Was it really Tamerlan in the middle of the street as the witness recounts?

Kitzenberg affirms the story that the brothers had another pressure cooker. Was it filled with gunpowder or was it a firework? There doesn’t seem to be any damage from this bomb if it was a bomb. How could any of the brothers get close to set off the explosive? It exploded in the middle of the street. What was its purpose? They would be able together close enough to police to properly detonate it.

During the night firefight, was Dzhokhar and Tamerlan calling out that they did not do it?

I believe these brothers were given a weapon or two and some type of explosives before the Boston bombings so if they would be the patsies and blamed for the weaponry, the FBI would have their evidence and excuse for taking down the brothers. The two patsies kept these weapons as self-defense and used them for the chase in trying to flee from the police.

A day after the April 19 chase in Watertown. Dzhokhar’s blood found only on the outside of the boat, not the inside. Police now admit Dzhokhar was unarmed and did not shoot himself, admitting that police had shot Dzhokhar in trying to kill him.

Second, there are aerial video and photographic evidence showing that Dzhokhar was able to come out of the boat under his own power with no blood or injury to his self. Nor was he carrying a weapon in his possession. Photos in the daylight have shown that there is no blood inside the boat but on the exterior railings of the boat, the side where the police were located. This looks like the police shot at Dzhokhar as he was walking from the boat, this is why there is blood splatter (real splatter and not drips of blood) on the exterior of the boat with the bullet holes in the side of the boat.

A thermal video from the helicopter may also prove this as well. As Dzhokhar was walking from the boat, you can see that his head goes back. If he was shot in the throat at this time, this would confirm he was shot by police when turning himself in and not a self-inflicted wound, which would prove true as Dzhokhar was UNARMED during the entire 20 hour chase. Initially, police tried to state that Dzhokhar put a gun to his mouth and tried to suicide (Daily Mail). This proves that police were lying about the real facts of the chase.

Just as Tamerlan was murdered by police, they tried to murder and silence Dzhokhar like they did to Christopher Dorner.

Over the whole ordeal, over 200 rounds of ammunition were spent by police. We have yet to see proof from a police dash cam that Dzhokhar really ran over his older brother.

The nude male arrested by police in Watertown is not Tamerlan though he has the same muscular built and hairline that is similar to Tamerlan’s. However, one obvious point that is missed is that Tamerlan was about 6’2” at about 200 pounds and had a hairy chest. The nude man arrested does not look to be 6’3” in comparison to the height of the police vehicle and other police officers, nor did he have a hairy chest (Muslim men do not shave the chest hair). The nude man looks to be about 5’10”. Others want to know why police did not disclose this man identity? Well, because it would shoot his reputation in the foot and would be quite embarrassing. CNN local newscast video immediately after the arrest and custody of the nude man.

Dzhokhar arrested after being shot in the throat by police on April 19, 2013.

Really, it sounds like the FBI having been planning to set up these two brothers for a few years now. They did not have a backup plan. Everyone knows you do not return to your normal life without a plan to flee if you just committed a bombing on a very iconic American and international event with tens of thousands of spectators and runners.

If you just committed a major felony and had planned it, would you have your car in the shop and no plan to escape? Besides, would you remain in the area of bombs you have just planted and detonated? No, because you would kill yourself!

Tamerlan photographed after he is brutally tortured to death after he is captured in Watertown on April 18, 2013.

Tamerlan was tortured and killed:

The photograph of Tamerlan shows him on a table, not a hospital table though. Which hospital puts wounded and injured on a table with a wooden bar for the neck to rest on? The room could be part of a safe house. The wood bar is used in torture to force a subject down on the wood to cause intense head and spinal cord pain. A possible cervical collar is laying to either side of the neck and almost matches the same width of blood around his neck. Tamerlan looks brutally tortured before death. It seems his heart rate still monitored by monitors and an IV which is not unusual in torture. However there is the antiseptic? Police have stated that the photograph is 100% authentic (TMZ).

TSARNAEVS WERE TWO OF SEVERAL PATSIES:

Both Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev were just two patsies that were blamed for the Boston explosions.

Infowars.com were able to accumulate a number of images that show several possible suspects with the descriptions the FBI provided for males with a large black backpack and white cap. Anyone one of these men could have been blamed for the attacks.

Once Infowars posted their article concerning the number of different possible suspects from witness photographs, CNN and other news agencies had to retract their story on April 17 that the FBI had in custody the suspect of the attacks.

Dzhokhar and Tamerlan photographed leaving the blast site at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.

Brothers unjustly targeted by FBI and CIA, tracked for 5 years:

In photo showing bother brothers leaving the blast site, the FBI states that it is evidence Dzhokhar committed the attack because he is not wearing is backpack. First, that is not evidence. That is suspicion. Tamerlan can be found 50 feet behind Dzhokhar with his hand on his shoulder as if he is still holding onto his backpack strap as he is running.

Second, the image is very possibly Photoshopped in order to cover the backpack on Dzhokhar’s back. There is a box of white pixels that interrupt the contour of the brick wall and into Dzhokhar’s back.

Backpack on Dzhokhar is Photoshopped out, which is clearly seen by the white box against the brick wall.

Look at the surveillance video the FBI provided the public to view as proof that the two brothers committed the crime, there are several anomalies in the video.

In the first half of the video, there is a man standing in the doorway of a store. Once the two brothers past the man, he inserts an earpiece into his ear and covers his mouth as if he is speaking to other FBI agents. The FBI made the mistake in not blurring this man in the first half of the video but does so in the second.

There are only two people blurred in the video even though there are a good number of other people that could have been blurred. The other blurred individual is a woman wearing a blue jacket and holding three bright yellow balloons. What is significant about this is that these bright yellow balloons could have easily been used as a marker for rooftop operatives to spot and in videos and photographs, these brothers could be later tracked and quickly blamed.

The video shows that the brothers had a dark gray backpack and a white-gray backpack, not two black nylon backpacks that were purported by the FBI and special agent Richard DesLauriers. Even after the explosions, we can see that at least one backpack was black, not gray nor white. Dzhokhar’s backpack did not even seem that heavy (like the weight of a pressure cooker) as it is slung on his right shoulder.

Second, the FBI stated on April 18 that they had video of the brothers placing the backpacks on the ground. Yet, they have not shown this evidence yet to the public. In their press conference, they also coaxed the media and public to only look at these two brothers as suspects and NO ONE ELSE and to receive help from their family members and friends to HELP IDENTIFY THEM.

FBI special agent Richard DesLauriers said only look at certain photos with the two men during a press conference in hope to steer public attention away from other possible suspects (1:20 mark). DesLauriers and the FBI were playing a psy-op game with the American people to send in as many video and pictures as possible but then to say only look for these two suspects now in the images. But what if there were more than two suspects? And of course, the FBI already knew who these two brothers were.

Why did the FBI need the public’s help to identify them when the FBI had been tracking them for the past 5 years? The FBI already knew who they were as the FBI formally interviewed Tamerlan in 2011 (The Telegraph and CBS News).

The FBI had denied these accusations but soon enough they had to admit they were true. What else has the FBI lied about concerning the Tsarnaev’s?

Russia had contacted the U.S. State Department, CIA and FBI several times in regards to Tamerlan’s connection to terrorist groups and on their terrorist watch list (Boston Globe). Russia’s intelligence agency (FSB) feared that Tamerlan was an Islamist militant that would carry out an attack on Russian soil. Russia pushed the CIA to add Tamerlan to the terror watch lists in the fall of 2011 (Washington Post). Tamerlan visited Russia during a seven month long trip seeking counsel from several radical Muslim groups on a U.S. State Department/CIA-sponsored trip. The CIA declined to comment on this story. Russia not only warned the U.S. State Department but told the U.S. they did not want Tamerlan in the region. Tamerlan’s name was listed in the U.S. government’s classified database with lists of terrorists (TIDE) three months before Tamerlan traveled to Russia on January 12, 2012 (Reuters). DHS secretary Janet Napolitano tried to excuse her agency for stating they flagged his departure, but not his return to the United States. The question is: what was the CIA’s role in Tamerlan’s travels to Russia?

The Tsarnaev brothers’ uncle, Ruslan Tsarni, was married to former top CIA official, Graham Fuller (MadCow Morning News). Ruslan was also a Halliburton contractor and aided terrorists from Fuller’s residence (MadCow Morning News). This is also the same uncle who was the only family member who derided and condemned the brothers as the suspects of the bombings (CNN).

First Lady Obama would rather visit Al-Harbi, known Saudi national and terrorist, than any of the Boston Marathon victims.

The Saudi National:

Hours after the bombing in Boston, law enforcement and FBI detained a Saudi national under custodian arrest at a Boston hospital due to his injuries and was a “person of interest” to the FBI as having a strong connection to the bombings. The FBI was so interested in Saudi national Absul Rahman Ali Isa al-Salmi al-Harbi, a 20-year-old on a student visa, they searched his apartment and took out two bags of evidence and was under FBI protect at the hospital. But soon, the authorities announced that it was a mistake and he really was not connected to the bombings, and the Saudi would be deported back to Saudi Arabia (WND).

He was probably the handler of the two Tsarnaev brothers and part of a much larger CIA and Al-qaeda terrorist network than we are told. How do we know this?

Al-Harbi was on the terrorist watch list and was even on the no-fly list but he still had big connections. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal visited the 20-year-old student and President Obama even though the meeting was not on Obama’s schedule (The Global Dispatch). Al-Harbi also has connections to the Saudi royalty and had six members of his family also connected to terrorist groups (The Global Dispatch).

On Thursday, April 19, First Lady Michelle Obama secretly visited the Saudi national at his hospital room without initial public knowledge of the visit. Obama would rather visit this “person of interest”, first thought to be connected to the bombings by the mainstream media, rather than visit any of the victims of the terroristic bomb blasts. How strange!

This news was initially reported on a Saudi Arabian news site, Okaz.com, and the information finally seeped through into the American media. How particular that the Obama Administration did not want its own citizens to know of its connections with the Saudi national.

Al-Harbi was so connected to the White House, he has even made several trips there for several hours at a time. This reminds me of the similar situation of Anwar al-Awlakithe U.S. citizen who had terrorist connections and later bombed in an Obama drone strike, had visited the White House on several occasions.

DHS director Janet Napolitano said al-Harbi was not placed on the terror watch list until after he was detained by the FBI. But if this is true, how is the Saudi national not labeled a “terrorist” and tried as a terrorist but the American government is saying he is innocent as a terrorist and is being deported under section 212, 3B for his involvement in the Boston bombing? Is the Saudi government that powerful and well-connected to the American federal government that we would freely let go a terrorist on the terrorist watch list and deport him back to his home country?

Al-Harbi has visited the White House on several occasions.

Al-Harbi was probably the FBI/CIA handler, or one of the handlers of the Tsarnaev brothers, teaching them in building explosions and probably training them for a future terrorist event. Since the FBI was not able to blame the NRA/right-wing extremist plot on the Boston attacks, they had to shift to Plan B and continue to blame Muslim fundamentalists.

Liberal and Mainstream Media Ready to blame Right-Wing Extremists:

In terrorist attacks, the media only gives themselves two avenues to blame: right wing extremists and al-Qaeda Muslims terrorists.

Immediately after the event, CNN national security analyst Peter Bergen was ready to place the blame on right-wing extremists even though there was no information in regards about who could have been involved in the attacks. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer speculated that it was an anti-tax group or tea party group that set the explosions.

Other news outlets like Fox 25 stated that it could be anti-government government groups and could be right-wing extremists because it was April 15, Patriots Day and also Tax Day but also that Oklahoma City bombing was in April. There is a connotation that Patriots Day is connected to freedom and independence from a tyrannical government (i.e., American revolution and independence from Great Britain) and many extreme conservatives do not agree that it is constitutional to pay taxes to government. The Obama Administration and Axelrod were prepared to blame the terrorist attack in relation to Tax Day.

On April 17, midday on Wednesday, Boston Local News 5 at WCVB.com stated that surveillance video from a Lord & Taylor department storefront has led to the possible identification of the Boston Marathon suspect. A law enforcement official stated that a suspect was in custody at this time and was expected in federal court, as the AP reported. CBS News also affirmed the report that the individual was a young, white male wearing a white baseball hat and gray hoodie and black jacket who quickly flees the blast site. CNN also went with the story but then later retracted it. However, the FBI and U.S. attorney’s office denied that anyone was in custody or was to be brought to court.

Many people believe that this individual in custody was the patsy for the NRA, right-wing extremist role to play the lone wolf narrative.

In all of this, why do people not blame left-wing extremists? To draw attention away from themselves. When the media is ready to blame those who support the Constitution, then we know it was a false flag attack on the American people. Those who are Constitutionalists truly want to help people, not murder them. You shall know them by their deeds.

Craft International and CTC operatives were spotted before and after the explosions at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.

Large Police Presence, CTC Operatives, Craft International Involvement for a DRILL:

There were 400 National Guardsmen, 2,000 policemen, bomb sniffing dogs, men on rooftops and surveillance cameras on every corner, yet they still could not find the bombs or prevent the explosions.

There is also the eeriness that CTC were possibly working alongside Craft International or other private contractor military. We know this as these men were wearing their signature Punisher logo apparel and ball caps. These men were photographed just yards from the bomb blast at the finish line before and after the explosions. The black backpacks holding the explosions looked exactly like the backpacks these Craft individuals were wearing in comparison to the backpacks Tsarnaev brothers had, which looked nothing like the bags used. The Craft backpacks even had a white square on the handle correlating to a white square on the torn bag. Tsarnaev brothers did not have a white square. Yet, the media made no mention of these spooks.

Before the explosions occurred, witnesses recount the fact that it was announced over loudspeakers and the PA system that the presence of bomb sniffing dogs and law enforcement on the rooftops looking down on the streets near the finish line of the marathon were due to the fact that a drill or exercise was taking place.

University of Mobile’s Cross Country coach, Ali Stevenson, told Boston Local News 15 that marathon officials were “making announcements to the participants do not worry, it’s just a training exercise.” Then he said, “Evidently, I don’t believe they were just having a training exercise….I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in.”

A commenter has stated that these quotes by Stevenson were deleted from the original article:

“They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about,” Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

“There was just smoke, another explosion went off,” Stevenson said. “We all started running. There were people crying.”

DELETED: “Stevenson said there was no question in his mind that this was an intentional act”.

Why was Stevenson never interviewed by mainstream media? Why not have media come forward to say it was normal to have this type of police presence at these events or say that law enforcement had prior knowledge of a bomb threat? But no such statement has appeared.

Someone had prior knowledge and someone did want the bomb sniffing dogs near the finish line and have bomb spotters on rooftops. Stevenson did state that marathon officials were saying it was just a training exercise taking place.

Stevenson said that he has run in other marathons before but had never seen “bomb dogs at the starting line of any running event” and that “they kept announcing to runners not to be alarmed, that they were running a training exercise” (AL.com).

Now I am not advocating that law enforcement officers knew that explosions would take place. Though the FBI on scene would know and possibly even the CTC operatives/Craft International. The Boston PD probably only understood that there would be a drill or bomb squad training during the marathon. And this would ring plausible because in the past several Boston Marathon events, there have been bomb drills at each one. These Boston Marathon drills were called “dry runs”, or exercises to test new tactics and technology without the use of real explosives (Boston Globe).

The government and sects of government are highly compartmentalized. This is how an operation like 9/11 can take place with only a few people knowing what they doing and why and others who do their job because they are told to. It creates a great cover story for those who are compartmentalized and just doing their job to say, “Well, we were there right at the scene because we were doing a drill” or “We just happen to be nearby during a training exercise for a similar situation.” These law enforcement officers are simply doing their job and responding to the staged event not knowing that other sects of government have intentionally set a drill to go live.

More than two explosive devices in Boston:

The media, including Boston Globe’s Twitter feed, reported that a third device was exploded as a controlled explosion near the library at 600 Boylston St. about one hour after the initial two explosions at the Boston Marathon. At least, it could be the same location as the two other bombs because the Boston Public Library was directly across the street from the second bomb. But what does not make sense is that media reported a third explosion and fire at the JFK Library (Business Insider and Boston Herald). Authorities were quick to state that the JFK Library fire was due to a mechanical failure but not specific of what cause the fire.

Boston Globe’s Twitter account from April 15, 2013.

It is also very possible the bombs were not made of nails and ball bearings as we were told but only gunpowder. There was no damage to the debris of the pressure cooker that had signs of nail or shrapnel contact. It seems if the federal government had gone to blame the NRA, right-wing patsy, they could use new legislation to attack gunpowder and ammunition.

If gunpowder was used then its use was to injury and harm as few victims as possible (or none). Amputees are used in military training exercises.

Here is a great news story from CNN detailing the role of amputees in military drills:

When the bombs exploded, there was no damage to the blue canopy nor flags above the blasts and no damage to the fence. Gunpowder is used in fireworks. Witnesses stated that it smelled like sulfur after the blasts. Glass from the windows was blown away from the storefronts and buildings, not inside them, meaning the explosions came from inside the store and not from the sidewalks. There were security in yellow jackets surrounding the area right before the bomb exploded, yet they are not injured nor hurt. Only a 78-year-old runner fell to the ground but none of the security nor were runners hurt. Meaning no shrapnel or nails were placed inside the pressure cookers.

News stated there were over 180 injured from the blasts. Another news source stated over 260 people were injured in the attacks. But there has not been one lawsuit filed against the City of Boston or Department of Homeland Security or the FBI for failure to prevent the attacks nor find the bombs in time although there was a massive police force with bomb sniffing dogs at the marathon. Is there any way we can see a list of names to prove this? A recent article stated that One Fund Boston accumulated over $28 million for the victims (The Washington Post). For sure, terrorist attacks are good for charity funds.

Double amputee in a wheelchair after the explosions at the Boston Marathon. Where is all of the blood from his dismemberment?

Amputee Actors for the Drill:

People two feet from the bombs would have been dismembered and killed immediately. If there were real bombs used, first responders would have needed to drive ambulances to the blast site.

Parents and actors pretended their child killed at Sandy Hook when it was a FEMA drill. Amputees have been used during military training exercises as seen in this CNN news report: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSLm_yWqADc.

Man throwing powder on victims? If the man was throwing towels he would not clap his hands together and then throw them. He would not throw towels, he would hand them over for someone to use a dressing for a wound. Victims are covered in dust when they are being rolled on a wheelchair but they are not covered in dust after the blast.

I encourage anyone interested in the Boston Bombings to read the frame by frame analysis and observation of Matt Bauman (possible amputee) from B’Man’s Revolt, Are You Just a Believer or Do You Think?.

In summary, Matt Bauman was a runner at the marathon near the finish line. He had his legs blown clear off from the femoral arteries. In the first minute, someone with this type of trauma would have fainted and after two minutes, there would not have been enough blood in the body to sustain life and he would have died. This is why many people assert that Bauman is actually Nick Vogt, former U.S. Army lieutenant and double amputee.

And you would never carry this type of trauma victim in a wheelchair with no pressure to the wounds and no way could he hold his leg up as he was wheeled away from the blast site. First responders would only use a stretcher for his extraction. He would have fainted and there would have been blood all over his body and those carrying him. There would have been a trail of blood. Carlos Arredondo the man with the cowboy hat hardly had any blood on his arms or sleeves and he was the one who lifted Bauman with legs bleeding on to the wheelchair.

On the ground, there was no one helping him for about two minutes yet other people seemed to be receiving medical attention but not a man with two dismembered legs. An African-American woman, who was lying next to him, with no cuts or blood, deserted him on the ground while he is rolling on his back with missing legs. A few photographs later and we see the woman in a stretcher with blood all over her face and body. REALLY?

There would be blood and flesh all over the ground after the explosion but we see none immediately after the blast. Not until about 30 seconds after the explosion do we see any sort of red blood/liquid on the ground, but still no flesh. There are people with clothing torn to shreds and with holes in them, but there are not cuts, bruises or blood on these people.

There was also a name confusion in the first two days after the blast that Nick Vogt had his legs blown off from the explosions, not Matt Bauman.

What a coincidence, the amputee is also the same man who told police the information that led to finding the suspects of the bombing. When he woke up from hospital bed, he immediately asked his brother for a pen and paper and wrote, “Bag, saw the guy, looked right at me” (News.com.au).

Martial law and door to door searches and evacuations in Watertown, MA.

Reason for the Explosions? Martial Law:

Other than the obvious reasons for the federal, state and city politicians to state they need more surveillance cameras (Bloomberg and CBS News). for public safety (yet no cameras in Boston saved anyone on April 15), higher security and law enforcement, including federal agents and TSA, are needed at sporting events (NBC News), and in general, less rights for the people of the United States. Mayor Bloomberg believes the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution would need to change after the Boston bombings (Politicker).

The Boston Bombings were used to acclimated the American people to martial law and for the federal government see with what it could away with in order to catch two patsy terrorists, one being unarmed. The bombings were also key in drawing attention away from the fact that a nonpartisan House Committee created to review presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama for war crimes (New York Times and PressTV).

Thousands of police including SWAT went door to door questioning residents of Boston and Watertown. With no search warrants, law enforcement and SWAT evaluated residents and homeowners at gunpoint. Boston and Watertown were closed down, no one was allowed on the streets.

Martial law and door to door searches and evacuations in Watertown, MA.

Martial law hits Boston, MA.

Martial law hits Boston, MA.

Police questioned American citizens to show their identification in order to prove their identity that they were not one of the terrorists. Well, even if you looked nothing like one of the Tsarnaev brothers or were female. Essentially, everyone needed to show their papers as if it was Nazi Germany. Papers please!

Just like in Nazi Germany, Boston and Watertown residents were subject to proving their identification on the streets on April 19, 2013.

These people’s rights were violated and the Constitution was suspended for these communities.

In an interview, investigator author Joel Skousen believed since the FBI already knew the identities of the two Tsarnaev brothers and were monitoring them. The authorities only needed a way to flush them out and what better way to do so than to initiate a city-wide manhunt using martial law and door to door searches as the means.

What would set off the chase on April 18? The most ambiguous part of the bombing narrative is the death of MIT police officer Sean Collier. Authorities told the public that Tamerlan shot the officer for a second gun for his younger brother to use (CBS News). How stupid!

On Friday, April 19, Boston Police Commissioner Ed Davis avoided clarifying the nature of the distress call that Collier responded to. This was the same police call that involved the Tsarnaev brothers. Recently, Collier began to volunteer for security at the same gym where Tamerlan boxed (NY Daily News). He was also the only police officer we know who had any connection with the Tsarnaev brothers. Could the FBI/Boston PD had orchestrated Collier’s death to tie-up loose ends to the brothers and also rally the large police force against the patsies?

Other eerie oddities and Remaining Questions:

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev became U.S. citizens on 9/11/2012 (CBS News), the 11 year anniversary to 9/11/2001.

George W. Bush practically says that 9/11 and Boston Bombings were part of a larger “conspiracy”, receiving an astounded look from Laura Bush.

Illuminati Jogger playing card. One of 412 cards produced by Steven Jackson in 1995. These cards have been key in predicting major false flag attacks and world changing events over the past two decades.

The bomb at the finish line was near 666 Boyster St.

Female roommate had a BMW with a fake license plate with Terrorista#1 on it (Daily Mail).

On March 17, Fox aired a Family Guy episode, called “Turban Cowboy”, portraying main character Peter driving over marathon runners at the Boston Marathon with blood, limbs and guts flying through the air, eerily imagery that resembles what happened on April 15. Hulu and Tivo removed the episode from their systems for viewers unable to watch it.

Can the FBI show their video evidence that the Tsarnaev brothers placed the bombs? Show the video and we can at least say they were the bombers, but this does not disregard their role as patsies in a much larger operation.

Can the FBI show any proof that they made purchases of pressure cookers, ball bearings, nails, gun powder and igniters?

Can the FBI show specific communications these brothers were planning the event? And if so, who were they communicating with?

]]>https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/the-boston-bombings/feed/2tsarnaev-suspects-boston-bombingquestionsuntamedSecond explosion seen at the Boston Marathon on April 14, 2013. Explosion looks as if it is coming from inside storefront out towards street.Allegedly Dzhokhar Tsarnaev drove his Mercedes SUV towards two police vehicles and sped between them on April 18, 2013.Tamerlan Tsarnaev seen firing a handgun as he and his younger brother find cover behind a Mercedes SUV in Watertown on April 18, 2013.A day after the April 19 chase in Watertown. Dzhokhar's blood found only on the outside of the boat, not the inside. Police now admit Dzhokhar was unarmed and did not shoot himself, admitting that police had shot Dzhokhar in trying to kill him.Dzhokhar arrested after being shot in the throat by police on April 19, 2013.Tamerlan photographed after he is brutally tortured to death after he is captured in Watertown on April 18, 2013.Dzhokhar and Tamerlan photographed leaving the blast site at the Boston Marathon on April 14, 2013.Backpack on Dzhokhar is Photoshopped out, which is clearly seen by the white box against the brick wall.First Lady Obama would rather visit Al-Harbi, known Saudi national and terrorist, than any of the Boston Marathon victims.Al-Harbi has visited the White House on several occasions.Craft International and CTC operatives were spotted before and after the explosions at the Boston Marathon on April 14, 2013.Neither of the Tsarnaev brothers' backpacks match the destroyed bomb bag. However, Craft's backpacks match the destroyed bag.Boston Globe's Twitter account from April 14, 2013.Double amputee in a wheelchair after the explosions at the Boston Marathon. Where is all of the blood from his dismemberment?Martial law and door to door searches and evacuations in Watertown, MA.Martial law and door to door searches and evacuations in Watertown, MA.Boston-martial-law10bbostonmil10Martial law hits Boston, MA.Martial law hits Boston, MA.Just like in Nazi Germany, Boston and Watertown residents were subject to proving their identification on the streets on April 19, 2013.Illuminati Jogger playing card. One of 412 cards produced by Steven Jackson in 1995. These cards have been key in predicting major false flag attacks and world changing events over the past two decades.Sandy Hook: Pot Holes in the Story, Multiple Gunmen and the Motiveshttps://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-pot-holes-in-the-story/
https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-pot-holes-in-the-story/#commentsThu, 21 Mar 2013 03:48:20 +0000http://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/?p=27…

As the official story developed at Sandy Hook Elementary on December 14, 2012, news reports from mainstream media including CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, The Newtown Bee and other online newspapers continued to change or redact official reports from law enforcement.

Days later, the reason the media could not get their stories right and that the reports were initially wrong, we were told, because in this fast pace day and age of online media, newspapers are in competition with each other and other social sites like Twitter for the newest breaking news.

Many of the news interviews from the shooting were not sourced or named. This allows authorities or media to quickly manipulate or change the narrative of story if they need to and are not liable for the information the “unknown” source provides.

As readers and spectators of news, we should have discernment, not believing immediately everything we see or hear. We need to understand that non-sourced news and un-named witnesses is not credible news. What was occurring at Sandy Hook is that unnamed officials and law enforcement officers were feeding the information to the press.

Officially, media were not making up news on their own. That would hurt their credibility even more. If unnamed and non-sourced officials are giving information, then no one can be liable or responsibility for the truthfulness of that reporting. The story and narrative can be immediately changed an hour later and even instantly. Different media outlets can be giving updated information instantly over the internet from different “officials” at the crime scene. This should not be possible.

First, how could officials and law enforcement inform the media with different reports and information from an incident in the same time frame? There should not be different stories about what happened from law enforcement. Could they not agree on the same script? The left hand did not know what the right hand was doing.

Second, why is the media not doing their job as professional journalists and naming their sources like witness, law enforcement and government officials? Like politicians, law enforcement and other government officials are sworn by the Constitution of the United States under God to serve and protect the American people. We need to hold their feet to the fire, we need to keep them accountable for their actions and what they say. We should be able to trust them because their responsibility is to protect us as the American public and taxpayers and not endanger or harm our lives. We practically entrust our lives in the hands of police, first responders and EMS. It is the job of journalists to inform the American public what we need to know and ask those tough questions to politicians and law enforcement.

STORY WITH NO SENSE:

There are too many conflicting accounts from witnesses describing the Sandy Hook incident. One witness says there were two gunmen, another four gunmen, and another man describing a second shooter arrested and sitting in the front seat of a police car.

The parents and children do not seem traumatized after the event and are casually interviewed by reporters. All of the children give similar reports from the incident as if they had memorized a script. None of them speak of the hundreds of gunshots or blood or broken glass.

The story of how Lanza walked through the classrooms shooting anything that moves seems falsified, especially the story about Victoria Soto.

On December 15, The Courant recounts the story that Soto’s students were hidden in a classroom closet and when Lanza demanded to know where the children were, “Soto tried to divert him to the other end of the school by saying that her students were in the auditorium” (A Methodical Massacre: Horror and Heroics). She hid her students in a closet (I have NEVER seen a teacher’s closet ever empty but always fully filled). The story continues to state that Lanza walked up to Soto and demanded to know where the children were and Soto tells Lanza that the kids are at the auditorium as if to divert his attention and trick him. This sounds so mindless. Lanza who has Asperger’s Syndrome and is super shy will demand to know where the children were? Did not Lanza wear earplugs so how could he hear Soto’s answer???? (authorities four weeks after the incident now say he was wearing earplugs).

The article also states that he fired with “deadly accuracy” and only used three magazines from the rifle. This does not make sense because over 150+ rounds were fired.

One brave teacher, Kaitlin Roig, bundled a bunch of children into a bathroom and locked the door. What’s interesting about her testimony to ABC News is that when police arrived and asked her to open the door, she refused, saying that “if they were really cops, they’d know where to find keys to open the door.” In addition, she requested that they slide their badges under the door.

Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and all interactions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either impersonating police officers or were indistinguishablefrom SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building.

This witness account shows us the short time frame from the shooting to police arriving. The shooting appears to have ended minutes before law enforcement appeared on the scene.

Weeks later after the shooting, authorities are now stating that Lanza wore earplugs during the shooting. The earplugs were still in his ears when his body was found. “He wore earplugs to protect his hearing, a curious discovery, because detectives believe he had every intention of killing himself inside the school. The hearing protection was still in his ears when police found his body. Investigators say he shot himself in the head with a handgun when he heard police sirens nearing the school.”

The Daily Mail later deleted these sentences. They were saved in a screenshot of the article.

“We surmise that it was during the second classroom episode that he heard responders coming and apparently at that, decided to take his own life,” [Governor] Malloy said on ABC’s “This Week” (The Huffington Post).

Why did they not say this immediately during the initially steps of the investigation and not four weeks later. May be there was an oops moment and realized that he had Asperger’s Syndrome and that many people with Asperger’s or Autism do not like loud sounds and would be scared of the loud noises of the gun.

They say he wore the earplugs because he would not like to hear the cries and screams of the children. The story does not make sense when we are told that he killed himself when he heard the sirens of police vehicles. But how could he hear the sirens when he was wearing earplugs?

Tracy makes the point: “Why would the school’s administrators run towards an armed man who has just noisily blasted his way in the building?” He also points out that two staff members were hit from a “hail of bullets” but returned to their meeting room to call 911.

The press always made excuses that they need to be continually putting out live updates but do not source their material. But how do you make the mistake saying that the father was killed in New York City or that Ryan Lanza was missing along with his girlfriend in Hoboken, CT. Many early news reports stated that both Ryan and Adam were the shooters. Other reports said that Adam killed his mother and then his father before driving back to Connecticut to shoot the school.

The most recent reported story from authorities state that all three weapons were found next to Lanza’s body (other reports stated four handguns found next to his body, excluding the AR-15). However, they said that all wounds to the victims were from the Bushmaster rifle. So he never used his two pistols, including the Glock and Sig Sauer?

Also, more importantly noted is that the first reports were stated that the rifle was left in the trunk of Lanza’s vehicle but later the sheriffs changed their report to say that the rifle was found next to him. HOW DO YOU MAKE THAT MISTAKE? How was the rifle not found next to his body initially? The major elements of the story that were later changed are very suspicious.

Also, why did Adam supposedly have his older brother’s ID in his pocket when the older brother, Ryan Lanza had not seen Adam since 2010? Did the shady cops make a mistake and make a copy of the wrong Lanza ID? Ryan said he had not seen his brother since 2010 and Ryan lives in New Jersey and works in New York City. Ryan Lanza never claimed that his ID was stolen. The initially reports had stated that there were two shooters, Ryan and Adam Lanza. Did the police plant the wrong ID on Adam as they were trying to use both brothers for the incident?

At the Alabama blog, we can see that Ryan Lanza was questioned as a possible shooter at 2:37 p.m. CST. The article at that time also states that the AR-15 rifle was found in the back of the Lanza vehicle.

At 2:20 p.m. CST, Reuter’s had reported that the entire kindergarten class was not accounted for when it was the first graders that were killed.

At 2:25 p.m. CST, the Associated Press had stated that the individual arrested in the woods in camouflage was “Lanza’s younger brother” (probably Adam).

At 2:15 p.m. CST, the Associated Press reported that Ryan Lanza was the shooter and that Adam Lanza was being held for questioning as a possible second shooter. The “law enforcement official said the boys’ mother, Nancy Lanza, works at the school as a teacher. The official also said Ryan Lanza’s girlfriend and another friend are missing in New Jersey.”

Even the Washington Post at 1:56 p.m. CST had identified Ryan Lanza, 20 years old, as the shooter. CNN also confirmed this information at 1:22 p.m. CST.

At 2:02 p.m. CST, FoxNews had reported that both parents were found dead in their homes.

ABC News had reported that a manhunt was in process for a second gunman and police were searching cars. They had stated that the shooter was a 24-year-old armed man with four weapons and wearing a bullet-proof vest, sources told ABC News. We know that the first shooter (Adam) was dead before police arrived so this second gunman could not be confused for the first.

Tyler Durden of Zero Hedge stated that the second shooting suspect was a 24-year-old man with a bulletproof vest with four handguns and was apprehended and in custody.

The 24-year-old man would be Ryan Lanza, Adam’s older brother.

I don’t know how these instances were possible by law enforcement when Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey and most of the early reports for five hours stated that Ryan Lanza was the lone shooter and confirmed dead on site. And then Ryan’s girlfriend and roommate were also reported missing.

Within an hour of the school shooting being reported to the police, the small town of about 2,000 people already had a SWAT team from another district prepared, equipped and traveled to the school and search and cleared the Newtown Elementary building. There were also five other different tactical teams (distinguished from their uniforms) from various local, state, county and federal assets, including the FBI and ATF. This is also one of the reasons this incident looks more like a district-side emergency service mass casualty drill and not a real shooting.

Also in that first hour, the police had already searched the home of Lanza before they knew who did the shooting and found that that the mother had been shot four times in the head. But how did they secure a warrant from a judge and with travel time involved, already search and clear the Lanza home?

I also want to know how did witnesses see Lanza’s face and his eyes if he was supposedly wore a black face mask? If Adam intention was eventually to kill himself, why did he wear a black mask to hide his face? And how was Peter Lanza, the father of Adam, reportedly found dead in New York City within hours of the shooting but was later found alive? http://www.empowernetwork.com/jsmagnus/blog/peter-lanza/

All witnesses of the shooting reported multiple shooters (2 – 4) and then over time, the officials narrowed down the killers to only the lone gunman story who plays violent video games and is socially awkward and keeps to himself.

A second gunman:

Later in the day, police chased a possible second gunman captured on video by a helicopter that ran into the woods near the school. When reaching the woods, the police in a tactical training maneuver, in the chase slowed down and never took out their guns. It was as if the chase was for a show. At the 0:40 mark, another dark figure appears from out of the woods at the top right corner of the frame.

One witness, Rob Lowe, and one student on camera stated they saw the man arrested. Lowe stated that he was wearing camo pants and a black jacket was arrested and placed in the front seat of the police cruiser. The arrested individual told parents, “I didn’t do it!” Why would an arrested man be placed in the front of the squad vehicle? It is as if the man was used to throw off the public from the real story of what really occurred at the school.

A boy asserts that he saw a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. Again, this indicates that the police took a suspect into custody. If that was Adam Lanza, how did he then kill himself? In that same video, why is there a construction worker with a hammer turning rocks over at an immediate time like this? The important witness is cut off from the news as he is telling his story. WHY???? Because he witnessed a second gunman or a fake gunman?

Another witness student states that he heard someone say, “Put your hands up,” followed by the reply, “Don’t shoot.” This indicates that the police took a suspect into custody inside the school. Was this Chris Manfredonia?

News tried to report that the man in the chase was Chris Manfredonia who was a father of a 6-year-old daughter and was headed to the school to bake gingerbread houses with her. The article only explains that he ran around the building and was then briefly handcuffed. The LA Times article does not detail that this was the man who was chased into the woods. Not many fathers would go to school wearing camo pants and a tactical vest. And if it was a father of a student, he would know that he was innocent and not run into the woods and try to flee.

Before CNN deleted their article from their site entitled, Minutes of carnage lead to lifetime of grief and anxiety in Newtown (I found a cached article of it on the internet), it had stated that the gingerbread house making would be at 2 pm in the afternoon in Victoria Soto’s classroom. If the gingerbread class was to be at 2 pm so why would he be at the school so early? Manfredonia also lived a few houses from Adam Lanza and was an alethic coach at one of the high schools.

The Newtown Bee tries to answer the question about the arrested man wearing camo pants, stating “a man with a gun who was spotted in the woods near the school on the day of the incident was an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town, according to the source.”

But he was seen being pursued into the woods. Why would a SWAT officer be seen at the crime scene with a weapon and from a different district? Only if Sandy Hook was a drill which would likely have many different police teams from different districts training together. It is possible that the police staged this scene to confuse the narrative of the shooting.

State Police Lt. Paul Vance at a press conference the day after the incident gave unsatisfied answers. When asked whether Nancy Lanza had any connection with the school, he replied defensively about something that is both unrelated and arguably the most significant fact that completely undermines the official narrative: the arrest of a second gunman in the woods. Vance implies that the man arrested in the woods was cutting firewood 75 yards from an elementary school during a mass shooting.

A woman had to be corrected by her friend when she mentioned that there had been two shooters at the crime scene. An officer is also seen holding the rifle the wrong way? That fake gun must be light and not loaded. Trained professionals do not hold weapons like that or walk like that.

The D.A. is now stating that there were multiple shooters/suspects involved in the Sandy Hook shooting though Lt. Paul Vance said there was only one suspect. Who are they? Why is the media not talking about this? And why do they not want to reveal the five search warrants and keep the name sealed? Digital Journal

The article states that there were 28 killed at Newtown (20 children and 8 adults). Some other media states 26 people were killed and other sources say 27 killed. Why cannot the media get the number of people killed right?

More than Two Gunmen?

The black vehicle, later identified as Christopher A. Rodia’s and not Nancy Lanza’s, was found with all four doors opened. If Lanza was the only gunmen, why were all four doors of the car opened? It does not make sense.

In the Police Scanner, at the 1:38 mark, a report that gunfire is still being heard, even though the shooting was supposed to have ended by the time police arrived.

Then at 2:35 mark, we hear that the shooting has stopped and the school is “in lockdown”.

At 3:23 mark, the police relay a teacher’s report that she saw “two shadows running past the gym”. This is followed by another officer on the scene who says, “Yeah, we got ‘em, they’re coming at me! … [inaudible] … Coming up the driveway real slowly!” Then at the 5:40 mark, the same officer says that he has the suspects “proned out”, which means he has apprehended them and they are laid out on the ground. Then another officer comes on to say, “Be aware that we do have a second [inaudible] …”

Who are these suspects arrested?

At the 19:10 mark, an officer who sounds out of breath, like he’s just given chase, reports what sounds like “these guys…multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotgun”. If these were found so early on, why were they not included in the initial press reports which stated that three firearms had been found – the Glock, Sig Sauer and Bushmaster AR-15 rifle?

One of the nuns seen at the Sandy Hook incident before Gov. Malloy was to speak.

Two nuns were seen and photographed at the Sandy Hook fire station and were later pursued by police as seen on the Police Scanner. The Chicago-Tribune labeled a story, Elementary school shooting without fully identifying it and posted a picture from Don Emmert (Getty Images) of two official looking nuns wearing a yellow federal ID badge and 511 tactical shoes. The nun on the left looks as if she or he (a possibility) is hiding a weapon under her coat.

Early reports from school staff said that an “organized group of nuns had infiltrated school property”. May be in the real FEMA drill, these nuns were used as the gunmen.

At the 1:35:00 mark of the Police Scanner, an officer pursuing a vehicle states, One may be wearing a nun outfit, headed toward Danbury and Stoney Hill, purple van.” At the 1:34:19 mark, the officer saw “two occupants with possible ski masks”.

Close-up nuns at Sandy Hook. What is she hiding in her coat?

Why are nuns wearing military tactical shoes and a federal yellow card? Is the ID Badge to identify them as part of the FEMA drill? There were also early reports of a van and a car with the back window broken (shot out) driving away from the crime scene.

The alleged weapons from the Sandy Hook incident.

ACCURATE LANZA:

The medical examiner on December 14 stated that most of the victims were shot 3 – 11 times. Some were shot multiple times in the head with automatic gunfire. The shooting lasted about three minutes long and children represent very difficult targets to hit. How did Lanza fire so many accurate bullets of almost 200 rounds with automatic gunfire in such a short timespan? The accuracy with full-auto is near impossible!

The amount of ammunition would have also required Lanza to change his AR-15 magazine of 30 rounds at least 6 TIMES! The young man would require military training. Initial reports said that Nancy Lanza took Adam to the firing range though later reports have stated that Lanza’s mother never took him to the shooting range. The officials say Lanza had taped the magazines together so he could reload quicker, called “jungle-taping.” This technique also requires tactical training. Friends and acquaintances of the Lanza family said that Nancy loved Adam so much and never heard of her taking her son to the range in his condition with Asperger’s Syndrome. Firing range owners said they had never seen Adam at the range.

Adam Lanza also weighed about 115 lbs. How could he carry four handguns and a rifle, not to mention including the 200 rounds of ammunition? With all of the weapons and ammunition on his body at 115 lbs., how was he able to stay mobile and able to move around?

Lt. Paul Vance and other police initially said that Lanza shot up the school with two handguns that were found next to his body. Then hours later at the Carver postmortem, Vance interrupted and answered for Carver to say that Lanza only used the AR-15 rifle for the shooting and was found next to his body with the two handguns. This confused the media because the police had said that the AR-15 was left in the trunk of Lanza’s vehicle. How did the rifle get from the trunk to next to his body in a span of hours after he died? When a reporter asked what did Lanza use to kill himself with, Carver answered that he “did not know”. This is seen at the 5:30 mark of the postmodern on December 15.

So this is very odd. Why did Vance need to interrupt Carver for the proper information that Carver could not answer himself? Was the actor who played Carver not given the key information to set the narrative on its proper course? We were told that Lanza only used handguns for the shooting but now a rifle was found next to his body. How could the police not see the rifle next to him when they reported only handguns was found with him on December 14? Why was this information not relied to the public from the beginning? Why did the police need to change the story to blame the AR-15 rifle? Also, why could the medical examiner not answer how Lanza killed himself? With the pistol or rifle? It is very difficult to point a long, heavy rifle at your head.

With all of the law enforcement at the scene, over 1200 officers deployed, none of them could tell the different between pistol shells and rifle shells on December 14?

NBC news confirmed reports from state officials and police that 4 handguns were used and also confirmed that officials said he left the AR-15 in the trunk of his vehicle. State Officials told MSNBC that four handguns were found in the school and that an AR-15 was left in the car. This news report was from December 15, a day after the shooting.

Then in the cover of darkness, hours after the postmortem press conference, the media show an aerial view of police opening the alleged trunk of Lanza’s vehicle and then taking out what appears to be a pump shotgun. Then the cop handling the weapon un-chambers the shotgun cartridge as it can be seen flying out of the gun. The shotgun appears to be a Russian SAIGA 12.

So what is a shotgun doing in the back of Lanza’s vehicle that the police made no reports to the media about? Why did the police give false reports that the AR-15 was not used in the shooting and was found in his vehicle and then later said only the AR-15 was used and not the 2 or 4 handguns Lanza had, depending on which story you believe?

And still months later after the shooting, we still have not been told by which weapon Lanza used to kill his mother.

The police stated that Lanza drove his mother’s car to the school. However, the mother’s silver 2009 BMW was still found in the garage after the shooting had occurred. The New Haven Register verified that Nancy Lanza drove a silver 2009 BMW. The car Lanza allegedly drove was a black Honda Civic with CT plates (872 YEO). However, this car is registered to Christopher A. Rodia, a drug dealer from Florida, currently residing in Norwalk, CT.

Why did not one report from the media run these license plates and report this evidence?

Rodia is a 42-year old white male from Florida. As a criminal, Rodia was charged with third-degree larceny, conspiracy to commit third-degree larceny, first-degree criminal mischief, third-degree criminal trespass, possession of narcotics and failure to carry prescription drugs in prescribed container.

On the full 2 hour police scanner at the 30:20 mark, we can hear a police officer running the 872 YEO license plate number and R-O-D-I-A’s name. Joe Quinn has tried to debunk the theory that Rodia was in a traffic stop elsewhere in the state and that Nancy Lancy once owned a Honda Civic. However my concern is if it was true that Rodia was in a traffic stop elsewhere in the state of Connecticut, why is his vehicle photographed and seen in front of the Sandy Hook school? Why is his car seen with four doors open in the front of a major crime scene????

Rodia’s car is similar to Gene Rosen’s car in his driveway but the license plates are not the same.

RED ALERT: CT ST POLICE LT PAUL VANCE & SCHOOL SHOOTING DRILLS Sandy Hook Elementary: shows that Vance has taken several roles in shooting drills in Newtown. The video shows several adults posing as parents waiting around the fire station. Several of these “parents” were interviewed by other reporters that day. The video also shows that at 10:06 am the police scanner is silent and then a police officer states that Christopher A. Rodia is the operator. Rodia’s car with the plates 872 YEO was found in front of the Sandy Hook school.

Rousseau’s car hit by gunfire.

Only One Car Hit with Gunfire?

The authorities found that Canadian substitute teacher Lauren Rousseau’s car was hit by gunfire. We are to believe that only her car was shot among the dozens of vehicles in the parking lot and that Lanza supposedly shot from towards the parking lot from inside the classroom. We have seen no evidence of other vehicles hit. The bullet holes that struck the vehicles look larger than 9mm or .223 caliber rounds and look as if they had penetrated the vehicle at close range.

How could only her car be hit from that distance? Why her vehicle? Most of the violence that occurred was mostly isolated to her classroom and Soto’s classroom. Since Rousseau was a substitute teacher hired only a few weeks before the incident, she was not given a key to her classroom and the only teacher not able to lock her room. Are we to believe that in Lanza’s crazy rage shot from the school to the parking lot and why was only her car hit by gunfire?

Another anomaly is that Rousseau’s father was not given permission to view her body to identify her. It seems that none of the parents were able to view their children either and all 27 victims had closed caskets for the funeral. Hotspring had an open casket. Not one parent was able to view their dead child and all of the victims were buried within 3-4 days after the incident (burying the evidence if there were any dead).

The coroner did not permit the father to view her because of the “severity of the damage.” Can a coroner stop a parent from confirming the identity of their child?

The father seems so matter of fact and indifferent towards his dead daughter in his interview to a reporter just a few days after the incident and then suddenly acts as if he is sad by breathing heavily and looking at the ground in the interview.

Bullet shot outward from inside vehicle or from wrong direction from school?

Bullet hole in Lauren Rousseau’s car already has rust.

The angle of her car facing the school, the bullet holes do not make sense. The holes look like they are shot perpendicular to the vehicle, not from the angle of the car facing the school. There is even rust one of the bullet holes. Would a car’s metal really rust in a day? One of the bullet holes is actually formed from a bullet exiting from inside the vehicle! The weather stripping and molding are pointed outward, not inward if the bullet was fire from the outside and into the car. The holes also seem larger than .223 round and may be as big as a 45 slug caliber.

Rousseau’s boyfriend believes he will see her again and hold her again as he stated in a CNN interview. He is practically smiling and looks like he wants to laugh as he is talking about seeing her again.

Principle Dawn interviewed day before the shooting about the shooting by Newtown Bee?

Principle Dawn was one of the first people killed at the school and spoke to Lanza face-to-face before being gunned down by him. However, The Newtown Bee interviewed Principal Dawn the day of the shooting and the story was published on December 13, 2012—a day before the shooting! How did a dead person give an interview and why was the story published before the shooting occurred?

Principle Dawn is a witness to the Sandy Hook shooting to a Newtown Bee article that was published on December 13, 2012.

The newspaper later retracted that story but James F. Tracy of memoryholeblog.com was able to capture a screenshot of the story. The beauty of online newspapers is that information and articles can be retracted or changed immediately. Now the story is not found on the Newtown Bee website.

From memoryholeblog.com:

Original December 14 Newtown Bee story with interview of deceased Sandy Hook Elementary Principal Dawn Hochsprung. Captured by Bing web spider on 12/13/12.

From Bingj.com: “Below is a snapshot of the Web page as it appeared on 12/13/2012 (the last time our crawler visited it). This is the version of the page that was used for ranking your search results. The page may have changed since we last cached it. To see what might have changed (without the highlights), go to the current page.”

Three days later the paper issued a retraction and revised the story further. No additional explanation was provided concerning what party Volkert interviewed and quoted at the crime scene, suggesting a conflicted attempt to establish the storyline.

The Newtown Bee retracts its story from December 13 about the shooting with Principle Dawn as a witness.

Nurse Sally Cox changes her story over several interviews and even states that the shooter’s mother was a teacher at the school. She is smiling very happily and shows no personal connection to any murdered students at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

Second Nurse says Teacher’s Son was Gunman and Mother was Fine:

Why were there such persistent reports that Nancy Lanza was a kindergarten teacher (or a substitute teacher, depending on which news source) and that she was killed at Sandy Hook Elementary when in fact she was never a teacher nor ever volunteered at any Connecticut school?

Nancy Lanza never had a public record of school certificate or teaching credential in the state of Connecticut. Peter Lanza was worth millions of dollars for working in the insurance department of General Electric. She had no connection to the Sandy Hook school so why did the “school nurse” mention that she worked there as a teacher? Why did the “school nurse” lie about Lanza being a kindergarten teacher and worked at the school for 15 years?

The “school nurse”, Sally Cox, is not a registered nurse but there is one under the name of Sarah Cox. Sally is a nickname for Sarah.

Her story changes from the fact that she saw Lanza’s eyes and saw him face to face and then dropping below her desk to the fact that she was already under the desk and could only see his knees and feet. The nurse seems to stutter or close her eyes when she mentions “my computer desk”. In one interview she states that she only heard five loud banging sounds, not hundreds of gunshots. She also mentions that she was hiding in a room closet for four hours even after the police had secured and cleared the school hours previously. And she stated how nice it was how “Lanza closed the door behind him” when he left her office.

And if she had been in her closet for four hours, there would have been some video footage of her being escorted out of the school by then (1:15 pm EST).

In her interview with ABC News interview with George Stephanopoulos, Sally Cox had great composure for the interview with a nice sweet smile and did not seem like she just went through a shooting and took care of young children who were just murdered in front of her eyes.

Once the argument that Nancy Lanza was never a school teacher at Sandy Hook, the officials started to change their story that she was a prepper who owned guns for an economic collapse, portraying her as weird and paranoid.

Others have done research and found that Scott Vollmer , events director for Bloomberg Media, has a mom (Janet Vollmer) who works at Sandy Hook Elementary as a kindergarten teacher. Vollmer lives in Hoboken only 1.6 miles from Ryan Lanza and was in Newtown two weeks before the shooting.

The nurse never named Nancy Lanza and was probably referring to Janet Vollmer.

If an eyewitness identified the suspect to be a son of a kindergarten teacher, who they referring to Vollmer and his mother? The narrative had stated that the shooter had specifically sought out his mother’s classroom first. This was never reported by the mainstream media or any news agencies.

Ridiculous and falsified motives for the shooting:

NBC and investigators said that Adam Lanza went on December 13 that there was an altercation between Lanza and four staff members at the Sandy Hook school. Later Vance said there was no such altercation between staff members and Lanza. Mainstream media and government are changing their story again and seemed to have falsified the motive early on.

As ridiculous as it seems, finally two months after the Sandy Hook, investigators have stated that Lanza was obsessed with the Norwegian mass murderer, Anders Breivik, and in direct competition with him as he wanted to exceed his death toll of 77 people killed set two years ago. They also stated that Lanza was motivated by violent video games but we have not yet been told which video games. But how would police know this if Lanza totally destroyed his hard drives and the FBI is not able to recover any data on him and Lanza had no electronic footprints?

Threat to the First Amendment for those who do not Trust the Government:

The Sandy Hook incident not only brought a threat to the second amendment but also to the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Lt. Paul Vance threatened to prosecute those who question the official story of Sandy Hook or give out “misinformation” that authorities do not agree with.

“There has been misinformation coming from people posing as the shooter in this case, using other IDs, mimicking this crime and crime scene,” Vance said, adding that some of the posts are of a “threatening manner.”

“It’s important to note that we have discussed this with federal authorities. These things are crimes. They will be investigated and prosecuted.”

The Connecticut Governor, Daniel P. Malloy said something very curious in his press briefing. He said that they were “spoken to” and told to be ready for something like this in their state.

He said the following…

“Lt. Governor and I have been… spoken to, in an attempt that we might be prepared for something like this playing itself out in our state.”

He was also in a previous active shooting drill with two shooting gunmen who took hostages at a high school. The second video also shows some of the video footage of the morning of Sandy Hook with a SWAT team standing around and EMS pulling a gurney with no person on it.

Americans and every single human being have a right to self defense and the right to defend themselves from tyranny.

While I do not want to make my disposition hinging on the point that the federal government and banker globalists helped plan the Sandy Hook incident years in advance for the repeal of the 2nd Amendment, while I believe this to be true, I did not want to concentrate on this point.

For years, the U.S. government and politicians have been working towards the ending of individuals the right to own weapons and the right to defend oneself from tyranny. Not only are American politicians working to ban guns in the U.S. but also from the help from unelected bureaucrats and international governments, including the United Nations. In 1960, the United States signed an international agreement with the U.N., called the Iron Mountain Report that would eventual bring an end to all personal-owned guns in America. And the U.S. has incrementally been working towards this goal ever since.

National and international bodies of progressive government have been working towards this goal for decades. President Obama and many other progressive liberals like Piers Morgan have been trying not to waste a good crisis for their political gains towards total socialism. Obama lashes out at the American people by using guilt and blame in this forceful speech if they had forgotten about the children at Sandy Hook and that they should feel ashamed of themselves if they cannot enact gun control and ban guns. Eerily enough, the man who headed Operational: Fast and Furious (shipping military grade weapons to Mexican drug cartels in order to blame the 2nd Amendment), Eric Holder, met with first responders in Sandy Hook in a meeting that was not publicly announced by the news media.

Even Communist China supports American gun control and gun registration, and then eventually after gun registration (because the government would know who owns guns from this), the elimination of all weapons (including handguns) in America. And we all know what happened in Communist China under Mao Zedong in the 1960s, a tyrannical and ideological dictator who banned all weapons in China and then slaughtered 60 million of his own people.

It is merely inevitable for the 2nd Amendment to be repealed in due time under the current political pressures by both the media and government.

It was very difficult for President Obama and CT Governor Malloy to cry with no tears running down their faces in their national televised press conferences on December 14. Their crying, with no actual tears, are represent to the whole Sandy Hook incident of trying to sell to the world an event that never happened and not one child was murdered. And then, using their fake crying to sell gun control to the populace.

Their crying faces were representative of the parents of the Sandy Hook victims where no tears were actually presented for their children. More than anything, Sandy Hook was full ofsmiles!

President Obama crying with no tears

Governor Malloy crying with no tears at his press conference.

Parents smiling as they walk from Sandy Hook Fire Station.

Parents smiling as they walk from Sandy Hook Fire Station.

Grace McDonnell’s parents laughing and smiling two days after she was murdered. They are wearing makeup, nice hair and no grief on their faces, no red eyes.

Jessica Reko’s mother smiling and laughing two days after her daughter was brutally murdered.

Daniel Hockney’s parents smiling at his funeral.

McDonnell’s living it up and smiling happily at their daughter’s funeral three days after she was murdered.

For Those Who Say, Impossible to Keep Sandy Hook a Secret:

When starting to investigate any major massacre or criminal event, I am as skeptical as possible when I hear the news reports and what conspiracy theorists say. Meaning, I make my own conclusions based on the evidence I see and not those I am told to believe.

Looking at the Sandy Hook incident, it would be difficult for all of the children and parents and relatives to keep silent if the whole event was fake and falsified. Think of all of the operatives that would be needed to be involved.

However, when you get down to it, the official story of 9/11 was falsified. A large backlash was created against people who do not believe in the government’s version of what happened, reporters threatened to lose their job for asking questions and people searching for the truth are ridiculed as “truthers”. Through the media, the government was able to manipulate the event to portray Arabian-Muslim terrorists under the command of Osama bin Laden as the culprits when there was a much more sinister plan underway. If the government and other globalists steer their version of 9/11 through the media and deceive tens of millions of Americans, what else could they do? Even the radio drama The War of the Worlds in 1938 showed the power of media manipulation through the radio could be powerful enough to deceive millions that Martians from planet Mars were attacking earth. People are like sheep, believing what they are told to believe.

Well, they could get away with the Sandy Hook incident. Easy enough, I have already shown evidence that most families and people involved as victims moved into the Sandy Hook, CT area within the last two years, with a large portion of those victims in the last few months. Those families involved would believe in gun control, in the name of peace for the whole world, anyone with no moral or godly values would agree to be involved to be against the 2nd Amendment, the government’s solution to Sandy Hook. In the name against the right for people to bear arms, how far could one go to take away that right? The families could agree to sign a contract for monetary and security gains, the government could offer millions of dollars for their silence plus full scholarships for college, medical, political and job opportunities, and new identities.

Fools like Robbie Parker pretending to be sad hours after his daughter was murdered would do anything for money as even friends of the family set up an Emilie Parker fund on Facebook even before the police released the victims’ names and the school was still on lockdown.

But how could those relatives not speak out that their nephew or niece was not killed? Most of the funerals were said to be closed casket. Many other relatives not close to the immediate family would really do believe that the children were killed and were not in on the conspiracy. Those families involved would simply move away from their life in Sandy Hook and retire on some far out island. Also, remember Allison Wyatt’s family never spoke out against the photos of Cathy Gaubert’s daughter used for Allison but it was Gaubert who spoke out! Monroe News still has Gaubert’s daughter’s portrait in the place of Allisons! And the relatives of Allison in Monroe County do not speak out!

But wouldn’t the children speak out and say it was a drill? Well, fortunately, this 3rd grader remembered the drill before being cut off by talk show host Dr. Oz. How many K-4th graders watch the news or would know how to communicate their story to the media? Many were probably told not to come to school on December 14 for some reason which is why we do not see 500 students evacuating the campus. At home these students were probably told that some awful shooting happened by their teachers and parents, and they were lucky to be home on that day. The children we see interviewed immediately after the event do not have expressions of trauma or crying and are very calm and seem to repeat the same script, hearing a few bangs but no gunfire. Compare those casual parents of Sandy Hook to the frightened and emotional parents of Atlanta shooting in January 2013.

And what could reporters do? Even after investigating the story and not just reporting what the government wants reported, they would not be able to publish their work. They would be fired by their editors and lose their job. Mainstream reporters are simply puppets, helplessly living off the system and repeating government talking points in order to survive. They have no real power to question or report the truth. Those investigative journalists smart enough to see through the fraud and seek to publish the truth, drop out from the mainstream media to become independent journalists, only to be ridiculed as “truthers” and wackos. Truth-seekers are made out to be criminals and terrorists by the very corrupt system that is ran by criminals and terrorists.

Miscellaneous Reports and Questions:

Joanne Didonato, the principle’s secretary, called in sick on Friday—something she rarely does. So presumably, she must have been awfully ill. Yet she then felt well enough to give an interview. “Of all days,” she said, emphasizing the strange coincidence.

Where are the all of the witnesses months after the shooting? Why has no witness recounted their story or any of the teachers and students months later?

Early reports also stated that a body was found near a family home in Newtown: Channel 3 Local News.

Local news stops stating which Lanza did the shooting because they could not trust the information given to them from the police. Were law enforcement officials trying to get their story in line? A fake FBI agent is on the site (0:55 mark and 3:20 mark). Odd: doctor at the hospital has no information or will not GIVE any information about the patients at the hospital no matter how many questions the reporters ask (2:40 mark). Parents walking causally with daughter. Again, no crying and no screaming by parents (5:40 mark).

Hartford Courant published a Googlemap of where Nancy and Adam Lanza resided three hours (EST) before Lanza’s name was released to the public:

0:44 mark = who is the teacher shot in the foot that was taken to the hospital? We were told that there were no survivors.

1:25 mark = local news needs to stop saying who the shooter was (because there was so much conflicting interviews from “witnesses” and police reports). The police did not know how to go about the story of the shooting.

2:11 mark = fake FBI actor just walking around in a FBI jersey.

3:25 mark = doctor gives no information about the three patients taken to the hospital except that they are being cared for. Doctor is gives very vague answers.

3:47 mark = doctor states that “I have no further questions…” Oops, you mean, “answers”.

5:00 mark = the doctor hesitates and gives an odd scripted response as if he remembered it how it was the “most tragic event I have ever experienced or considered…”

8:00 mark = local news retells the story of a second shooter found in the woods and witness saw him sitting in the front seat of the squad car.

15:40 mark = local news trying to say that dead body found in Newtown.

16:14 mark = USA News, the school nurse said she knew the suspect’s mother who was kindergarten teacher at the school.

The Sandy Hook Bizarro Show:

2:55 mark = ABC News Chris Cuomo interview shows a child from Sandy Hook laughing and smiling with no expression of fear or trauma after going through a mass shooting hours before at her school. Cuomo barely interviews the girl about the incident for a sound bite and mostly talks to her about the Nutcracker and her two front teeth and Santa Claus.

4:20 mark = Daniel Hockley’s relative as happy as can be after his funeral. Hockley may have been spotted at the funeral.

5:20 mark = nuns with yellow ID badges same as other FEMA/federal operators at the site.

In Arlington, Ohio, the Arlington school district put out a webpage on December 10, 2012 about children seeking help in dealing with the trauma to the Sandy Hook incident. Now the webpage, states an ERROR 404 – document not found. But we are lucky enough to have a screenshot of the article and date of creation.

The Arlington school district in Ohio uploaded a web page for children dealing with the aftermath of the Sandy Hook incident days before the event occurred.

Lily Gaubert’s image is used in place of Allison Wyatt’s photo.

Cathy Gaubert, an unrelated person of Sandy Hook, had to announce to mainstream media and social media sites to stop using her daughter’s likeness as a victim from the Sandy Hook incident. Her daughter Lily Gaubert’s pictures were stolen from the mother’s Flickr page and used as Sandy Hook victim’s Allison Wyatt’s images. What is strange is that family members (even the mother and father) of Allison Wyatt did not speak out that her photo was wrong, yet it was Gaubert who spoke out!!! Monroe News

Cathy Gaubert had to speak out that her daughter’s likeness was used for Sandy Hook victim. Why did not the victim’s parents speak out that it was not their daughter’s image?

Lily Gaubert’s image is used in place of Allison Wyatt’s photo.

There are only a few photos circulating of the children killed and the parents of the victims hold these same pictures in frames at the memorials and funerals and for national interviews on camera. After the 9/11 event in 2001, many of the alleged parents of the victims did the same thing by holding a frame of the only portrait of the victim released to the public as they did press conferences and interviews. Though I believe that people did die in 9/11, I believe the federal government used actors to impersonate reliable witnesses and manipulate the narrative of the incident for the government’s own agenda.

The Illuminati globalists always use a predictive programming and use symbolism to before their events (including false flags) take place. This is their way to say, we are the ones who did this and brand it as their work. These marks can be seen in tens of movies over the past 20 years showing that a 9-11 event had been planned. You can watch videos on YouTube about how 9/11 was portrayed in movies for years before the event took place.

The same idea occurs in the movie, The Dark Knight Rises. Before the movie premiered, the James Bond movie Skyfall showed a building named, “AURORA”, the same name that the Aurora, CO shooting took place the day the movie came out in theaters. The most condemning evidence is that the movie shows Police Chief Gordon pointing at a town on a map named, “SANDY HOOK”. He then says, “Get a GPS on it so we can start to figure out how to bring it down.”

Before it was called Sandy Hook on Harvey’s map, the movie had actually named the location, South Hinkley. Why was it changed before the movie was released to theaters?

There are also still images of the Sandy Hook name from the movie here.

Sandy Hook – Batman Map Comparisons-Google Earth:

The night The Dark Knight Rises premiered in theaters, the Aurora, CO theater shooting occurred during the movie. Before the shooting, the movie had previewed a trailer for “Gangsta” which showed a theater being shot up by four mafia members. Yes, this was not a coincidence. Also, a few days before the movie was out in theater, a Lil Wayne music video, “My Homies Still”, showed 23 skeletons dancing in a movie theater. Again, no coincidence. After the Aurora shooting, witnesses stated they saw two gunmen. Also, James Holmes probably never shot a gun before in his life. You cannot shoot from the hip and expect to hit a target, especially in darkness and especially over 70 people who were struck. What is also suspicious about the shooting is that two face masks were found at the scene and who can open up the Exit doors from the outside at a theater? Holmes looks drugged out of his mind on pharmaceutical drugs and his psychologist is a top ex-Air Force psychiatrist.

Anyone heard of MK-ULTRA? If not, look it up. Both the CIA and KGB mastered techniques to program assassins through torture, drugs, hypnosis, brainwashing and psychological conditioning. The drug LSD was created during the CIA program. Robert Ludlum wrote the Bourne Identity books from knowing about MK-ULTRA. Even Orwell’s 1984 displays some of the program’s brutal techniques on its operatives.

On July 20, 2012, the same day the Aurora shooting occurred, a random review for Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre was posted online though the movie was published in 2000. The movie starred Debbie Rochon, which looks like the mother of one of the Sandy Hook students, Ella Seaver, as seen in this interview with ABC News Chris Cuomo. A review of the movie is very “cryptic”:

A random review for Sandy Hook Lingerie Massacre was released the night of the Aurora, CO shooting, July 20, 2012.

“So here we have Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre. Let’s say that again, SANDY HOOK LINGERIE PARTY MASSACRE! What do you think of when you see that combination of words? What’s in a title anyway? Does it have a cryptic meaning? Who is Sandy Hook? What on earth am I writing about? Let’s move on…”

A random review for Sandy Hook Lingerie Massacre was released the night of the Aurora, CO shooting, July 20, 2012.

Can the Sandy Hook incident become even clearer that it was planned years in advance by the few in power over governments and money?

The 2011 movie Dream House that took place in Sandy Hook, CT about 1/2 mile from the school used predictive programming to help set up the Sandy Hook incident.

ILLUMINATI PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING IN DREAM HOUSE:

The 2011 movie Dream House, featuring Daniel Craig and Naomi Watts, featured Sandy Hook, CT as its main focus. The movie is about a father and his family relocating from Manhattan to Sandy Hook but “as they settle into their new life, they discover their perfect home was once the murder scene of a mother and her children” (Amazon.com). Normally when people watch movies, they identify and connect with the characters of the movie emotionally and mentally. Those who watch the Sandy Hook incident on television and read about it, subconsciously recognize that this event must be true and children were actually murdered. It is pure psychology and behavioral conditioning.

The girl who died at the Gifford shooting was born on 9/11/2001. Another symbolized calling card. All events most be connected and linked back to a secretive globalist plan.

The address on the business card show the where the house is located where the children were murdered. From the movie, the address is 1103 Riverside Road, Sandy Hook, CT (but does not exist). If the address did exist, it would be about 300m from Sandy Hook Elementary.

1103 is 11 * 3 = 33 master number in masonry.

The news media loved showing images of the Sandy Hook families with the beast sign. Victoria Soto and her possessed uncle.

Victoria’s Secret:

The R.I.P. Victoria Soto Facebook page was created on December 10 but the shooting took place on December 14. The page now says that it was created on December 15, 2012. Why did they change it? Also, why is there a script injector that triggers and lags the Facebook page once loaded? Many people have commented that anyone can change the title of the page after an account has been created, still, it would be weird that Soto would create a page or someone else on December 10 and then change the title for “R.I.P. Victoria Soto”.

Another anomaly is that Victoria Soto, one of the teachers killed at the school, appears to have had an “in memoriam” Facebook page created in her name four days before the shooting.

Not one individual cries for Vicki Soto except her younger sister days after the shooting. Why did not even her parents shed a tear?

Anderson Cooper interviews the Soto family. Mom trying to think of the lines, looks away from Cooper. Said many years at the classroom yet she was an intern the year 2010-2011. No one is seen crying, a few days after she was killed. Brother is wearing Soto school badge at the CNN interview (3:40 mark), same picture of Soto that is splashed everywhere. School badges require a headshot with a white background.

The news stated that Victoria Soto had worked at Sandy Hook Elementary School for five years as teacher when in fact she began working there as an intern during the 2010-2011 school year.

Victoria Soto was an intern at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2010-2011 and did not start working as a teacher five years ago.

There are a number of discrepancies and anomalies in Victoria Soto’s photographs.

who thinks of creating an account fund the same day as the shooting? A bank account quickly was linked up in the time of the shooting.

“Alan Prothero and I have set up an account at America First Credit Union to help Robbie Parker and his family with their immediate needs due to their loss of their beautiful girl in the shooting this morning in Conn. You can put funds in the account or give them directly to me or Alan. Please contribute what you can and spread the word: Emilie Parker Memorial Account at America First Credit Union. Account #9056862.”

… and the SEVERAL posts later…

“We’ve had an update. The school is still on lock down, I assume pending investigations. Robbie and Alissa have very limited information. They haven’t been able to see Emilie, and they do not know if she is still in the school or if she was one of the ones rushed to the hospital. We apologize for the misinformation that we gave you earlier. But we know still that sweet Emilie was a victim. We just don’t know any detail about what exactly happened to her.”

SANDY HOOK “BUSTED WIDE OPEN!!!” = Sandy Hook is also about soliciting money. Google found a cache of a webpage from the United Way of Western Connecticut from Dec. 11, 2012 asking for money.

In this video at the 6:40 mark, we see a photograph taken from the Obama photo shoot with the Parker family (two days after the incident), the Emilie Parker character is overlaid perfectly with the portrait of the family.

Google Search cache for United Way of Western Connecticut was dated on December 11, 2012. Now the shooting occurred on December 14, 2012. A cache date means the last time Google updated its search results for the United Way page.

The Owl Painting:

Grace McDonnell’s owl given to President Obama for his remembrance of the Sandy Hook incident.

Starting at about 1:55 mark of this video, we see two very happy parents of Grace McDonnell (Lynn and Chris) talking about their daughter. The parents do not seem real. Two days after their daughter was killed in one of the worst school shooting massacres, the parents have perfect smiles, perfect hair and perfect white eyes. Not one tear shed, no breaking of the voice. It was as if Grace had died years ago or never died at all.

More odd, is that at the 5:25 mark of the video, CNN shows a painting of an owl that allegedly Grace had made. The paintings shown are very well colored that you would expect to see from a children’s book, not made by a first grader. I have never known a young child to ever draw or paint an owl before. The owl is a very silent and mysterious bird and usually eludes people’s minds.

But two days after the shooting, CNN had already made lithographs of Grace’s paintings and both CNN’s Anderson Cooper and President Obama asked for a copy of the owl. The owl has many occult meanings, not just a figure for wisdom or knowledge, but for transformation and mysticism. The owl is sometimes represented as the Babylonian god, Moloch and was greatly worshipped in the Babylonian and Assyrian empires. Today, the owl is worshipped by international and American politicians and corporate CEOs at Bohemian Grove near San Francisco. Many former US presidents are known Masons and have taken part in many occult rituals. For Obama to accept the owl is an understatement, it is his way to publicly accept his role in the Illuminati satanic circle and show his side in the Sandy Hook incident.

For the Parents, Gun Control is the Agenda, Not their Child:

The mother and uncle of Noah Pozner never cry for him as they are interviewed by CNN and other news agencies even just a few days after the event. More than anything, the mother of Noah Pozner only talks about gun control!

The CT Post reports that Pozner’s mother, Veronique, is one of the parents to get heavily involved in the politicized gun control debate.

The Pozner mother also got a tattoo near her wrist in remembrance of her son 24 hours after the shooting incident. This is odd because she is Jewish, and according to the Jewish religion, it is wrong to have marks or tattoos on the body.

By her “own, original thought”, Natalie Barden sister to victim Daniel Barden wrote a letter to Obama saying that guns should be used for sport and should only be used by the police and military and if for sport, guns need to stay at a shooting range. This same letter was given to CNN’s Anderson Cooper to read live on air. It is such an oddity that such a little girl knew what gun control was and the letter was written a week before?

When the family was interviewed by CNN/MSNBC, not once did they shed a tear for their daughter or speak about her, only politicized their daughter’s death for gun control.

The McDonnell parents have also come forward in the name of gun control.

Sandy Hook Hair Salon uses a red, bloody hand for its logo.

Sandy Hook got a “new town” of Newtown, CT around 2010.

In 2010, a new hair salon was leased where an older hairstylist was kicked out unexpectedly from their storefront by the owner even when a new contract was being considered. An article was written about this in the Stamford Advocate. The barber shop that came into town was named, “Shh…co.” The hair salon’s symbol is a red, bloody handprint with white heart in its center. Handprints are universal symbols for kids and children. It is very odd that a hair salon wants to be known as Shh…co. as if to say, “Shh…be quiet. Keep silent about what you know.”

The heart in hand is a masonic symbol and symbolizes human sacrifice and even the cutting out the victims’ hearts.

Shh…we have pledged to keep quiet about the Sandy Hook incident…

There was an ongoing beautification project in Sandy Hook starting in at least 2005 by LRM Landscapes. The Newtown Bee mentioned that it was unclear if the lampposts would even be illuminated, meaning have lights! The Newtown Bee actually later deleted this article but you see the article in this video. The Newtown Patch also showed great interest in the $1.7 million beautification progress of Sandy Hook streets, lighting, extending the sidewalks and other pedestrian walkways in 2010 for the 2,000 person population. This is the Truman Show in reality!

Several of the victims’ families moved to the Newtown area between 2010 and 2012. Many homes in the town have closing dates of 12/25/2009 (same day as the Nigerian Christmas bomber).

The Parker family just moved to Sandy Hook eight months before the incident.

Lauren Rosseau took her job at Sandy Hook only a few weeks before the shooting.

Noah Pozner moved to Newtown a few months before shooting.

Rachel D’Avino was hired weeks before shooting and started two days before December 14.

Ana Marquez-Green moved to Newtown two months before shooting.

Charlotte Bacon moved to Newtown from Chicago a few years before shooting.

Dawn Hochsprung hired as principal for Sandy Hook in 2010. Husband George taught Rousseau when in middle school.

Though Newtown has only a population of about 2,000 people, the Church of Satan has made Newtown one of its headquarters. The first headquarters is located in San Francisco. Research has found that the Church of Satan also has a P.O. Box and headquarters in Newtown. While I cannot find concrete evidence that Newtown is an official site, which I am not surprised because the religion of Satanism is a shadow and not talked publicly, others do find hints of the occult in Newtown:

One of the oldest Masonic temples reside in Sandy Hook since the beginning of the foundation of the country. Called the Hiram No. 18 Sandy Hook, the Hiram Lodge was chartered on January 14, 1791. Like all secrecy surrounding the Mason religion, not much information is given about the duties and rituals or beliefs the Sandy Hook lodge is active in. But one of the oldest lodges in America, I’m sure it has something to do with the Church of Satan and the Sandy Hook incident.

]]>https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-illuminati-pre-scripted-analomies-and-dark-knight-rises/feed/0sandyhookmap1212-batmanquestionsuntamedSandy Hook Tribute - VimeoUnited Way of Western Connecticut uploaded a fundraising website for families of Sandy Hook days in advance of the shooting. A Google cache of the webpage states December 11, 2012.Timeline CNN December 10The Arlington school district in Ohio uploaded a web page for children dealing with the aftermath of the Sandy Hook incident days before the event occurred.Lily Gaubert's image is used in place of Allison Wyatt's photo.Cathy Gaubert speaks outLily Gaubert's image is used in place of Allison Wyatt's photo.The_Dark_Knight_Rises___Sandy_Hook_1288600d7ba553d0add8fcbc0a1e4f74d-darkknightA random review for Sandy Hook Lingerie Massacre was released the night of the Aurora, CO shooting, July 20, 2012.A random review for Sandy Hook Lingerie Massacre was released the night of the Aurora, CO shooting, July 20, 2012.Dream House predictive programmingSoto and the BeastVictoria Soto was an intern at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2010-2011 and did not start working as a teacher five years ago.Victoria Soto digital manipulationVictoria Soto ID BadgeActually looked like after Soto funeralSoto funeral composite imageOwl to ObamaSandy Hook Hair SalonSandy Hook Hair Salonmap-sandy-hook-mason-lodge-firehouse-rosenSandy Hook: Rosen and the Parkerhttps://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-rosen-and-the-parker/
https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-rosen-and-the-parker/#commentsThu, 21 Mar 2013 03:37:19 +0000http://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/?p=15…

Rosen’s story is that he lives right behind the fire station that is approximately 30 feet from his house. After the shooting, 6 – 11 students walked to his house (depending on the interview because he changes the number of children). In one interview, they were escorted by a man and a unidentified female bus driver. Rosen says that the children were calm. He took them into his house to play with his toys and then they began to cry how their teacher (Victoria Soto) was killed. In some interviews, he says that he took the children to the fire station, in others, the police station and in another he kept the kids and got each child’s phone number to call the parents. Not once does he think to call the police (911) which he probably should have if there was gunfire at the school down the road and had children at the front door.

Rosen having an interview the morning of the Sandy Hook incident at the Fire Station when he should be at his house playing with children, or so, he had stated as his alibi to tens of national news networks internationally.

However, Rosen’s story continually changes, and as an actor, he cannot get his script right.

Someone also leaked Rosen’s Audition Video that was shot while a helicopter is heard hovering in the air over school (probably after the incident).

In this video, Rosen sounds like he is trying to get his lines correct. He is probably looking at his phone to get the lines correct from the script. A helicopter is heard overheard hovering the school. At the 2:06 mark, a person is heard saying, “CUT”. Then Rosen looks at his phone to go over his lines.

Rosen wears shaded glasses depending on the light, his eyes will be shaded which helps comfort him if he is trying to sell a false story to the audience. Rosen tries to wear sunglasses to hide his eyes or not look directly at the camera. One of the tail-tale signs of a liar is that he will not want to look you in the eyes. He keeps trying to tell the same story from his script while wearing the same blue jacket and shirt that he wore when he was practicing his lines.

Rosen continues to change his story throughout the many interviews he served. He says that he called the parents (and not the police probably because he can’t say it because there is no police record of a phone call), and got the numbers from the kids and the woman with them. In other interviews, Rosen states that the kids are from Soto’s class.

Some real questions for Rosen:

Gene Rosen’s driveway is about 30 feet from the Sandy Hook Fire Station. Why did the children not walk there as they would have had to walk further to his house? Second, how did the children leave the school in lockdown and walk all the way to Rosen’s house? How did the police not stop these children from walking to Rosen’s house on the way to the school because it would have probably taken them at least 15 minutes? Third, if a female bus driver did escort them to Rosen’s house, why did she leave them with him and immediately not tell him to call 911 because there was a terrible shooting at the school? Why did Rosen not walk the children to the fire station 30 feet away but instead brought them into his house to play with toys? Even after he heard about children and teachers being shot, why did he not call 911 immediately? If he lived so close to the school and fire station, he would have heard the police sirens. Why did he not call 911 immediately when children showed up at his front door?

Why did Rosen not immediately ask what the children were doing? Why did the children take over 30 minutes to tell Rosen that their teacher was killed and their friends were shot? A real child, at least one of them, would have been frightened and scared and would have told Rosen what happened immediately. Kids may be young but they are not stupid or retarded. They are well-aware of their surroundings and environment and their feelings in any traumatic event.

You can view Rosen’s house from Google Maps and spot the house right behind the fire station. You can see Rosen’s detached house, yellow with two upper windows with green panes right next to the Fire Station. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2GmNfcttKc

Rosen’s house is right next to the Sandy Hook Fire House. Why didn’t the bus escort not drop the children off there instead?

According to People Magazine, the children that ran from the school were picked up from the police station and not Rosen’s house or the Fire Station, as he had stated. His original story is that six children were at his house. Interviews state that six kids were escorted by a female bus driver from the school and then left at Rosen’s house, past the Fire Station and let free at Rosen’s house? 11 kids may have ran from Mrs. Soto’s class but 10 survived (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRGPyM9NdyQ). She only has 15 students and allegedly 5 were killed. Also, how did the children run to his house and not the Fire Station and did not encounter any police?

On Fox News, Rosen stated that he got the children’s home numbers, and the female bus driver called their supervisor, somehow called all of the parents. He did not say he took them to the police station or fire station (as he did in other interviews). He shakes his head when he says that the bus driver must have had the contact list (as if he was thinking of information to make up). If the bus driver was there, why did it take so long to find out that there was a school shooting!?!

CT State Representative John Frey seems to have some personal connection to the Sandy Hook incident. Is gun control the answer, Mr. Representative?

From the News Times of Connecticut, an article titled, Someone is trying to kill us, repeats a similar story like Rosen’s told by a parent of a child from the school how she saw five children running away from the school, picked them up and took them to the police station. There, she sang to them and tried calling their parents. Then at the station, she received a text that her three children were safe at the school. Does this story sound very much like Rosen’s or what? And the article seems to account that she cared more about the children she found than her own three children? And why is there no formal interview of this parent? She could be a hero like Rosen. And why is this news article only four short paragraphs and buried below all the other news from that day?

This parent’s story is very similar to Gene Rosen’s heroic story. CT State Representative seems to be the only witness to this story and the culprit?

Rosen saw the Sandy Hook casualty list two days before the list was released to public at the 1:50 mark of the video.

Rosen was supposed to be a psychologist with only two years of community college from North Texas College. Further research shows that he provides a Pet Sitting Service. Here is his website from Newtown: http://genespetservice.com/.

The WHOIS shows that the web domain was registered in 2004 and last updated on December 20, 2012.

Boys screaming down the block in front of Rosen’s house then a black car drives by and then police arrive and then there are gunshots in this video. This is the most real witness at Sandy Hook. What is the incident they are referring to? Were these two boys shot?

Like Gene Rosen, the Parkers did many national and live televised interviews. Like the other parents of the victims, Robbie and Karen Parker failed to shed a tear for their beloved daughter in all of the interviews days after the shooting. In many of the interviews, the parents seem dislocated from their son/daughter and seem as if they were not killed.

Robbie Parker is said to have been the father of Emilie Parker. It is very difficult to confirm that Emilie ever existed because the family portraits she is in are falsified and she looks like a red herring. She seems to be an older version of Madeline Parker from her previous pictures and even her “aunt” thinks Emilie was the youngest of her sisters when she is allegedly the oldest.

Robbie Parker smiles and laughs before giving a sad speech on national television about Emilie without tears, hours after she was murdered.

At a press conference in front of the cameras within hours after the incident, Robbie Parker is seen happily laughing and smiling. Parker then asks someone off camera before speaking, “So I just read from the card?” Some others state he says, “Are we ready to start?” I’m not sure which line is better for his position. Who was Robbie Parker talking to and why did the father need a que-card to speak about his daughter and who was he speaking to? Why was he laughing and smiling so happy when his daughter was just murdered and then why did he need to pretend to be sad when he spoke?

He was like any actor hyperventilating and breathing deeply to change his facial complexion, trying to get a sad face.

Robbie Parker smiles and laughs before giving a sad speech on national television about Emilie without tears, hours after she was murdered.

Two Parker daughters are smiling with President Obama two days after the Sandy Hook incident.

Emilie Parker’s family (including aunt) smiling happily with President Obama two days after Emilie was fatally murdered. Shouldn’t they be sad?

Even two days after the shooting, the Parker family is laughing and smiling with President Obama. There is no grief and no trauma in their faces.

If Emilie was murdered two days previously, why is everyone so happy and smiling with President Obama and not filled with sadness and grief? What do they know that we don’t?

In the portrait with the family, Emilie’s face is sharpened greatly. The other two daughters are giving Baphomet signs with their hands. The girl named Emilie is always to the left and behind the father with no shadows on her in all of the portraits of the family shown to the media. In the age of digital cameras, why would the parents choose this one for their family portrait out of the 20 – 30 images they could probably choose this one?

Another photo with a stroller in the park makes Emilie with a pen and paper look Photoshopped about a CNN story about Emilie’s creativity. The lighting on her is different and the pose is very odd if she was in front of her father and he is not holding her as a father would in an image like this. The photo for the story seems overblown. It was not enough to talk about Emilie’s artistic characteristics, it had to be sold to us as a family photo was taken in a park with her holding a paper and pen, not noticing that a photo being taken.

Digital manipulation to Parker family portrait. If Emilie existed, why go through so much effort to manipulate her?

Digital manipulation to Parker family photograph.

Parker Portrait issues detected:

It is very possible that there are only two daughters of the Parker’s family ever existed in the first place. While this a first plausible assertion, new evidence shows that this may not be true. I recommend checking out the It’s Madeline with the President, Not Emilie article at Nodisinfo.com. New images have appeared online that give good credence that Emilie does exist. The issue I have is why someone would go through so much trouble putting out a few poorly Photoshopped family portraits with Emilie? Was it to throw off truth-seekers or was it to make a point to show how that truth-seekers look ridiculous and create a media limelight?

Emilie Parker does not show up in any of the class photos from 2012. The family had just moved to Sandy Hook eight months previously.

Emilie Parker’s aunt thinks Emilie was the youngest of the three daughters.

Sandy Hook Aunt Of Emilie Parker Confused? The aunt of Emilie thinks she is the youngest of her sisters:

At the 2:35 mark, the aunt of Emilie Park states, “Emilie was an example not only to her BIG sisters but to her family, to all her little friends, and now she has become an example to the world about purity, innocence, tragedy and forgiveness.” However, Emilie was the older of her two sisters. How does the aunt not know? She claims to be a Family Law Attorney.

I can understand if some parents may mourn without tears falling on the cheeks, but I have yet to a t.v. interview with one parent with tears coming down their face two days after the shooting. What the…? Did not their 6-year child just die? Or did their child die? Certainly Mr. Robbie Parker does not shed a tear. He even gives a great big smile at his daughter’s funeral in a car.

Whose dad smiles like this after leaving from a funeral of their murdered daughter? Is he happy about the gig he just pulled off faking his daughter’s death?

After the unspeakable loss he and his family have experienced in the past 24 hours, Parker told reporters that he’s not mad. “I’m not mad because I have my agency to make sure I use this event to do what I can to do whatever I can.”

The Parker mother looks as if she is on drugs. Robbie says that there is no anger towards Lanza and that he just had his own struggles like I have my own. That is so weird to say. He does not have any anger for Lanza but empathy when his daughter was just murdered by him? Mother just said she felt sadness, no anger towards someone that took her daughter’s life and that she felt “bad for him” and she could not “imagine how hard that would be”. At the end she says “the only way to move forward is to think about these beautiful children and their lives and to be so thankful that we all had them because each one of those children were so beautiful” and “all those families had amazing children” and “how inspiring they are to all of us”. Why did she not mention her own DAUGTHER? The mother’s reaction is just really weird with her eyes continually going up. At the 4:58 mark, there is a weird mouth gesture she makes. Whatever drugs they are on, they are red and acting weird and sweating like crazy. And not one tear was shed for Emilie.

]]>https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-rosen-and-the-parker/feed/2121712neighbor_dngnk-rosen-housequestionsuntamedRosen pretending to cry and be alarmed by the Sandy Hook incident while walking around the Fire House in the morning of December 14.Rosen having an interview the morning of the Sandy Hook incident at the Fire Station when he should be at his house playing with children, or so, he had stated as his alibi to tens of national news networks internationally.GeneRosen-FireStationRosen's house is right next to the Sandy Hook Fire House. Why didn't the bus escort not drop the children off there instead?CT State Representative John Frey seems to have some personal connection to the Sandy Hook incident. Is gun control the answer, Mr. Representative?This parent's story is very similar to Gene Rosen's heroic story. CT State Representative seems to be the only witness to this story and the culprit?Robbie Parker smiles and laughs before giving a sad speech on national television about Emilie without tears, hours after she was murdered.Robbie Parker smiles and laughs before giving a sad speech on national television about Emilie without tears, hours after she was murdered.Two Parker daughters with ObamaParkers smiling with Obama94977b24e3Digital manipulation of EmilieDigital manipulation to Parker family photographEmilie Parker's AuntParker smiling at Emilie funeralSandy Hook: Terrible Actors for Media Attentionhttps://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-terrible-actors-for-media-attention/
https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-terrible-actors-for-media-attention/#respondThu, 21 Mar 2013 03:34:48 +0000http://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/?p=13…

If Sandy Hook was a drill, real actors would need to be used to play the role of the parents, the children, the firefighters and first responders and may be even the police. This is not just Hollywood on the big screen, this is a real-time event that must look as real as possible for the live cameras of national and international media. I do think that most parents played themselves and the children did not die. Though there is enough photographic evidence to state that Emilie Parker never existed.

Luckily for us, we are given just enough video feed and photographic footage to distinguish this fake event from a real life incident. We see FEMA/federal operators with yellow card identification badges directing parents. Parents and children and public servants are seen casually walking around with no destination after 20 children were just murdered in 3 minutes!

All of the victims’ families are seen coming from behind the fire station. We can see Carlee Soto when she was on her cellphone, the Soto mom on her cellphone, we see the times when Jessica Reko’s parents and Noah Pozner’s parents walked out, they fake cry and then act normal immediately after. There is a man in a blue jacket. We can see half of the parents and families in this video, pretending to breakdown and cry at the same place but no person stops to look, they just keep minding their business and walk casually around them. All of the parents walk from around the Fire Station. An operator with a yellow ID badge is always around them, telling them what to do next. Others have noticed that only those parents involved are wearing tube jackets while those other parents with a child walking away are wearing casually clothing (it was warm on the day of the shooting). Sandy Hook Newtown Actors Watch 3:20 Onwards

Carlee Soto seen in the staging area behind the Firehouse while the McDonnell’s are seen acting.

In the footage seen from the ground in front of the fire station (not the school), nothing is coordinated. Firefighters are seen walking around aimlessly and not doing anything. In some videos, they are seen in groups talking casually and joking around. Also, why are all of the firefighters wearing fire gear complete with a hard hat when it was a shooter and no fire anywhere?

In many of the news reports, militarized police are seen walking around in circles holding weapons the wrong way. Do real police carry their sidearm like this?

In this video we see a man at the Sandy Hook Firehouse covering his mouth while he was on the phone.

Video from the police helicopter only captures the Sandy Hook scene after the police arrived at the school. The police are only seen running once (following a tactical-dressed man off-duty officer into the woods). They are continually seen casually walking or standing around. There are no SWAT vehicles, police cars, ambulances or fire trucks at the school. There are only a few blocked ambulances at the fire station, which is illegal because the first responders would not be able to leave.

Parents casually walking around with stroller like a stroll in the park (0:15 mark). At the 3:30 mark, the reporters state the Lanza home was down the street, but it was actually about 5 miles away. Why are all of the firefighters wearing fire gear complete with a hard hat when it was a shooter and no fire anywhere?

As stated previously, the crime scene is clean, the ambulances and fire trucks are blocked, no real medical personnel were allowed near the school, the bodies were removed during the night under the cover of darkness. There are no visual images of a large evacuation of children and families like seen in Atlanta’s shooting on January 31, 2013. Last but certainly not least, there are no parents or children traumatized or in shock, there aren’t any children crying or red in the face immediately after the event. Parents are more than happy to let their children be interviewed on national television following an event where their child was in danger to be killed as if it was casual Friday.

In all of the child interviews, a pattern emerges. We only see a few children of the 500 or so total students of the school. They seem happy and not distressed about the shooting. The children follow the same lines of a script about hearing a few bangs and then the police arriving to escort them out of the school. One child states it was like person banging a door. We do not hear about the hundreds of bullets and chaos the media told us about. We do not hear about the blood and screaming, loud noises or crying.

In all of the parents of a victim interviews, a pattern emerges. There is not one parent crying or tearing out of the dozen or so parents that did accept national interviews. They seem very happy and relaxed with happy smiles two days after the event. But the script is all the same. There is a little talk in the beginning of the interview about the son/daughter. Then the conversation moves on to what the son/daughter liked to do. And then about the last half of the interviews are about the parents feeling good that their son/daughter died with their friends and at their school. They say how they are okay that their young son/daughter was killed and not angry. The parents feel sorry for Adam Lanza and what he had to live through and how they feel sorry for the other victims’ families. Finally, the interviews end on what could have prevented the massacre like gun control. More than anything, the parents act like they are pretending to be someone they really are not.

Some of the parents and witnesses were pulling off dozens of national interviews after the incident. Why?

Sandy Hook staff member Shari Burton gives two different stories in her interviews. One of the stories is similar to Kaitlin Roig’s story.

3:59 mark = In her interview with Glenn Beck, someone is heard whispering, “Yes”, when she was talking about the terrible things in the world and how something so awful could happen at an elementary school.

4:00 mark = Burton has a Freudian slip, said “military” in the place of “elementary”.

9:00 mark = Burton’s story sounds similar to the Kaitlin Roig’s school story of someone trying to open the door, and she found out it was the police. In another interview, she said it was Rick, the janitor, who was checking the doors.

Wayne H. Carver during the Sandy Hook postmortem on December 15, 2012.

THE MEDICAL EXAMINER’S POSTMORTEM:

I also did a brief synopsis of the postmortem report with the Medical Examiner Wayne H. Carver (not the chief medical examiner) from December 15. His personality is probably naturally awkward however his discernment and attention to detail as a medical examiner is shallow and unprofessional. He fully seems like someone who would go along with what the authorities/cops wanted him to say. As a medical examiner (pathologist), I would expect from his 30+ years of experience in his profession that he would be a lot more proficient and knowledgeable of the explicit details of such an important incident.

After 30+ years of experience, he could not describe where the bullet entry injuries were or the positions of the bodies. Even more extreme, he did not know how many boys and girls were killed and he was the director of the medical examination team! He did not know how many bullet shells were recovered or presumably what weapons were used or how. For a medical examiner he seemed dull on his intel and appeared as if he never examined the bodies. He needed to defer to the state police for most of his information.

By the way, there is also a photo of Carver from December 14 wearing a firefighter uniform and directing vehicle traffic. Drill of this size and secrecy would require casting to play multiple parts because not enough people would be able to fill them, actors could be used for playing different parts in different scenes. And when was the last time you saw a medical examiner give a press conference in his lab coat?

On December 14, Wayne H. Carver directed actors and cars as a firefighter. The next day, he was the medical examiner for the postmortem.

I have placed count marks for Carver’s peculiar and Freudian statements at the December 15 post mortem conference:

3:24-4:16 mark = “I’ve been at this for a third of a century, and my sensibilities may not be the average man’s but this probably is the worst I have seen….And I hope they and I hope the people of Newtown don’t have it crash on their head later.” It is odd that Carver needs to justify his information by his experience. We would already have expected him to be the best of the best. What does Carver mean by having all of this “crash on their head later”? Would the truth come out later that the official story was a hoax? Also interesting is that Carver says one third of a century which is exactly 33.3 years and 33 is a master number for masons.

4:30 mark = Carver could not answer the question about which caliber was used in the incident. If he had 30+ years of experience and after looking at the bodies for 24 hours, he should have answered it. He says strangely, “It’s a good thing there’s not be a prosecution ‘cause then I couldn’t answer that.”

4:50 mark = Carver refuses to answer the question on the caliber used, “And I know I probably know more about firearms than most pathologists but if I say it in court, they yell at me and make me answer. So I’ll let the police deal with that for you.”

5:02 mark = The heads of the state troopers to the left of the pathologist suddenly looked straight down at the question about the AR-15 rifle. When people know when something is not the truth, they cannot give a straight face. It is easier to hide a smile and the truth this way, hiding their eyes and faces. Then, the state troopers look up to see if the pathologist gives the correct information and they smirk. This is very odd. They know they fed the pathologist false information and they wanted it to get to the journalists in an unquestionable manner.

-State troopers look at each other at 5:28 mark.

5:28 – 5:40 mark = Instead of the medical examiner answering the question if the long rifle was used in the incident, the Lt. Paul Vance interrupts to answer the question because it was a discrepancy from what the police initially reported. Why couldn’t the medical examiner answer it? Why did he not have such important information especially after looking at the bodies?

-The reporter catches the discrepancy in the official story, asking, “But was not the long rifle found in the trunk of the vehicle?” Vance answers, “That’s not correct, sir.” However, the day before Lt. Paul Vance and law enforcement stated that the AR-15 was left in the trunk of the vehicle and Lanza only used handguns in the shooting.

5:40 mark = The medical examiner does not know how many bullet casings were found at the crime scene, which would give evidence to how many bullets were used in the shooting. Carver does not know what to say. He seems very speechless, looking to get through the question any way he can. The medical examiner’s answer does not make sense as he looks around aimlessly, “I’m looking—I can tell you how many I found. I don’t know…there were lots of them, okay”. Hmm, not okay. You just said you could say how many and then you said you did not know…

–At this, the state troopers look down again. The trooper on the right nods his head and then puts his head down again immediately as if to say, “Good job getting through that question…”

6:17 mark = At the question about if the children died quickly, the state trooper nods his head and smirks. Carver could not answer the questions about the children.

7:00 mark = A reporter asks how the families identified the bodies. Carver replies, “We took pictures of them of their facial features” but how could this be reasonable if many of the children were shot in the face multiple times and no facial features would remain. Besides, in some cases, parents still want to see their son/daughter a last time. He ends saying, “We felt it would be best to do it this way, and you can sort of—you can control the situation, depending on the photographer and I have very good photographers.” What did Carver mean by controlling the situation with photography, everybody knows you can change a story by change the camera’s perspective. This would be true with the media in this event.

7:30 mark = The state troopers thought the medical examiner’s photography statement was funny and almost laughed (changing your photography perspective and what to show of an event has an impact on the story you wish to tell, the police understood this as any photographer would).

7:50 mark = Carver acts weird to answer a question on the time of deaths of the children and Lanza’s mother.

8:10 mark = Did Carver cover his tracks? He said that Lanza did not kill himself with the long rifle and then he said “I don’t know”.

At this point, Carver seems like he is answering the questions to get them over with.

9:00 mark = A reporter asks if the gunfire was aimed or spread randomly. Carver oddly sighs and smirks, “Both. It’s a very difficult question to answer. It’s really…You’d think after the thousands of people I’ve seen shot I could answer that question but I – if I attempted to answer it in court, there’d be an objection and they’d win.” Why could not Carver answer the question and why does he keep saying that he would lose in court if this investigation went to trial?

9:45 mark = Carver says that the children were wearing “cute kid’s stuff. It’s the kind of stuff you’d send your kids…your grandkids out the door in.” Why could not Carver be more descriptive?

10:12 mark = Carver could not answer where the wounds were on the children. “All over. All over.”

10:25 mark and 11:00 mark = Carver could not answer if the children were running away or sitting at their desks when they were killed, which he should be able to recognize if he examined the bodies. It is as if he never went inside the school! He again defaults to the police to answer about the medical examinations, “I’ll let the guys – the scene guys address that issue. Obviously, I was at the scene. Obviously, I’m very experienced in that. But there are people who are the number one professionals in that. I’ll let them go over…”

11:30 mark = Carver skipped an easy question he should have been about to answer immediately after the incident much less 24 hours later, “How many boys and how many girls [were shot]?” Carver with strange smirk: “I don’t know”.

12:30 mark = Carver says this is only his second press conference he has ever given in 31 years in the field. Why did not the Chief Medical Examiner give the presser especially for such an important case?

12:45 mark = Carver oddly talks about how his father and how he was named in an upmost tragic event where 26 people were killed. This is quite weird.

13:00 – 13:30 mark = “It wasn’t a tent, it was a magnificent thing…” Why does Carver give a better and happier explanation about the field tent in the parking lot than about the children killed in the school?

14:15 mark = Carver says he tries to make the examiner’s transport vans as “nondescript and unmarked as possible” and smirks, “To foil you guys.”

14:35-14:45 mark = Carver could not answer another scene question and looks at Vance for approval saying he will let the police handle that question.

15:00 – 15:28 mark = Carver says, “It was just my weekend [to examine the bodies]” and then smirks. He acts weird when answering that he could not determine how Lanza shot himself. He says he won’t “favor the obvious” and “in terms to my fishery responsibilities, I have not executed them yet.”

Why was Carver going to wait to view Nancy’s and Adam’s bodies? Why would he save the most important bodies until the morning and then the police move the bodies on the night of December 14?

A reporter asks, “Were [the students] sitting at their desks or were they running away when this happened?” Carver responds, “I’ll let the guys who—the scene guys talk—address that issue. I, uh, obviously I was at the scene. Obviously I’m very experienced in that. But there are people who are, uh, the number one professionals in that. I’ll let them—let that [voice trails off].” Shortly thereafter another reporter asks, “How many boys and how many girls [were killed]?” Carver shakes his head slowly, “I don’t know.”

And if you do not get the pun by now, his last name is CARVER and he is a medical examiner and cuts up dead bodies!

In September 2011, seven months after sending his letter to the State of Connecticut in reference to Bill 1054, Carver threatened to resign from his position. After the State of Connecticut passed his bill through the state legislature, Carver withdrew his resignation. Bill 1054 would prevent the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner “from unilaterally disclosing autopsy reports on pediatric homicides to the general public”, essentially allowing Carver to falsify or refuse to disclose any pediatric homicide cases. Pediatric cases would include the Sandy Hook incident and he does not need to provide any evidence that any autopsies were performed.

]]>https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-the-medical-examiners-postmortem/feed/0121215-medicalexaminer_620x350-carver-croppedquestionsuntamedWayne H. Carver during the Sandy Hook postmortem on December 15, 2012.On December 14, Wayne H. Carver directed actors and cars as a firefighter. The next day, he was the medical examiner for the postmortem.Sandy Hook: After-Incident Interviewshttps://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-after-incident-interviews/
https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-after-incident-interviews/#respondThu, 21 Mar 2013 03:30:58 +0000http://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/?p=9…

In video footage, sporadic groups of wandering parents and children are seen walking casually, some of whom are curious and far from traumatized or the grief-stricken or hysterical attitude you would expect from the parents and children that were just involved in one of America’s worst school shootings. There seems to be just actors walking around a movie set.

After the shooting, CBS and other news agencies interview children and parents. Other children are interviewed twice and parents are just casually waiting around without emotion as their children are interviewed. Parents do not look uneasy and are not rushing away. For example. Tracy notes, “The frequent hesitancy with specific words in this [sic] children’s [sic] deliveries, combined with a parent allowing their child repeatedly recount such an event and the unemotional, almost identically-worded delivery, suggests how they have been coached to present memorized lines.”

In this video, we see people walking around causally. No one is shocked by a school shooting. Parents do not mind the risk and no one is watching the incident. Reporter states police vehicles were left at neighbor’s house. Was it Gene Rosen’s house? Because that was where Rodia’s vehicle seems to have been stashed.

In many of the witness interviews, none state hearing hundreds of rounds of gunfire. The adults and the children say they heard a few bangs and like someone kicking the doors and the janitor knocking something down. Let’s Ask the AR-15 What Happened-Sandy Hoax!

This father and son do not seem frightened at all while his son just experienced a murdering scene. The son is smiling on a camera and the father talks slowing, thinking of which words to use. This interview is definitely not representative of the parents who spoke rapidly after the Atlanta school shooting.

Happy Alexis Wasik, apparently she did not hear any gunshots. She heard an ambulance and a police officer. She is smiling and looks pretty happy, not traumatized or red in the face.

Also, if there was a real shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, why were parents told, “If you haven’t been re-united with your child by now, it’s already over” at 22:45 (17:45) The Telegraph. Why were parents told this if this was a shooting? It sounds more like drill or exercise or staged event.

Media has gone to great lengths showing this image as Adam Lanza. But this was really Ryan Lanza’s image from his Facebook page.

FEW RECORDS OF ADAM LANZA, BUT HE DIED DECEMBER 13:

Adam was very shy. He did not have a Facebook page and no electronic footprints on the Internet. Police and FBI said he destroyed his computer hard drives beyond repair and could not trace his information. How did this happen? The police never told us how Lanza destroyed his equipment which is very difficult to do unless he shot them or burned them but we are given no information on this.

If he did destroy his computer, how do we know he spent hours looking at violent videos, military photos and obsessed with violent video games. Why do we not know which video games he played?

Who home schooled him? We have not seen any recent photos of Adam Lanza? We only know that he was homeschooled after 2009 after a 3.92 GPA at high school. His yearbook stated that he was “Camera Shy” in place of a photo. Then at age 16, he was taking college courses at Western Connecticut State University. Friends of Adam Lanza were not allowed to come into Nancy Lanza’s home. Friend’s of Adam Lanza say they have not seen him after 2009. No Record Since 2009

Other conflicting news stories about Lanza was that he lived in the windowless house basement with violent videogame posters on the walls or that he lived in neat and tidy two bedrooms of the large five bedroom house.

If Lanza really had Asperger’s Syndrome, he would have a huge medical record. Who is his clinical psychologist? Who was his counselor at school? Who diagnosed him?

If Lanza was on prescription pharmaceutical drugs, then who was his physician? Did he have a clinical psychologist? Why have these important people not come forward? It took six months for the police to confirm that James Holmes was on pharmaceutical drugs but we still do not know which ones.

At this point, it is very difficult to state that he even existed the past three years! We see no recent photos, he does not have a photo in the yearbook, he has no electronic footprints on the Internet, no Facebook, no Twitter. He is not mentioned in Nancy Lanza’s obituary or appears as a relative to Nancy, the Social Security Department states he died on December 13.

Genealogy sites are finding Adam P. Lanza’s Social Security Death Index (SSDI) records linking his death to December 13. This seems like a silly mistake to make especially since everyone knows that the school shooting was on December 14. What is also odd is that Nancy Lanza is stated as having died on December 14 but not him.

Why is Adam Lanza’s death certificate dated one day before Sandy Hook incident? Source material from SSDI office.

Intellius does not link Nancy Lanza to Adam Lanza, though Ryan and Peter Lanza are stated as relatives.

On Intellius/ZabaSearch, the site states that Nancy Lanza lived in Newtown, CT with relations with Peter Lanza and Ryan Lanza but no Adam Lanza. Why does Intellius not have Adam Lanza as a relative to Nancy Lanza?

Nancy’s obituary has no mention of Adam Lanza or how she died, though it mentions her ex-husband Peter Lanza.

Here is a slide-by comparison of two images of Ryan Lanza from his Facebook page. The media tried saying the image on the left is Adam Lanza but this is not true.

Even Peter Lanza had no picture of Adam Lanza in his Picasa picture album from 2006 to 2009, only Ryan Lanza. All of the photos of Ryan Lanza look like the Adam Lanza the news media showed us!

Could Ryan Lanza really be Adam Lanza? Ryan Lanza does not have any pictures of himself with Adam or just Adam Lanza. Even the aunt of Ryan/Adam Lanza was confused between Ryan and Adam. The aunt of Adam Lanza stated that it was the right age that Ryan would be 24 years old and was quiet and has some issues. Watch the 2:50 mark of this interview with Ryan Lanza’s aunt.

Ryan is only listed as a child in the divorce papers of Nancy and Peter Lanza though Ryan was the first son. Adam was stated to be given a vehicle when he would receive his driver’s license. Could Adam had changed his name to Ryan Lanza at age 16?

Transformations from Adam to Ryan & How It Happened:

Ryan is Adam and Photos So Fake – The Lanza Saga:

A man using the same large databases available to the news media, tax and financial accountants has found many discrepancies that Adam Lanza may have never existed. With his information, it brings in the idea that the news media found that Adam Lanza never existed and had said it was Ryan Lanza! This would also make sense because the police said that Ryan Lanza’s photo ID was found at the Sandy Hook Elementary School. May be the police were planning to pin Ryan Lanza to the crime but he quickly saved himself by returning home from work, going to Facebook and stating that he was alive and it was not him who did the shooting!

Several of the photos, even those showing Lanza at different ages, are from 2005 as seen in the files metadata. The metadata even sources Photoshop CS5 Macintosh, which confirms evidence of digital manipulation. Who is Kateleen Foy?

This video shows the very detailed comparison between three Foy photographs of Lanza as a teenager that were released to the media and the discrepancies between them, including manipulations to the arm, hand, table, motion blur and shadows. Why even go to the length to show the digital manipulations on three photos that are supposed to be just one?

The scene at Sandy Hook looks like a carefully crafted emergency drill. All of the emergency vehicles were lined up perfectly for photography shots. A helicopter is used for an aerial view of police chasing another law enforcement officer (later turned out to be an off-duty SWAT officer from another district wearing camo pants and dark jacket, Newtown Bee) as if to throw people off and confuse the story with the amount of gunmen involved. Again for a night scene, there is a helicopter used for the night scene showing a cop taking a shotgun (SAIGA 12) out of the trunk of allegedly Lanza’s vehicle but there were no aerial shots of children being escorted out of the school to the fire department except for the one photo showing about a dozen children.

This is the only photograph of children escorted from Sandy Hook Elementary School. Where are the 500 other children?

There is no photography or video footage of the actual weapons used, no bullet casings on the ground, no bullet holes, no hundreds of children being escorted to the fire station, no broken door and or glass of the school, and no surveillance video of military-garbed Lanza shooting up the front of the school! In all of Newtown, there were no residents or parents who took pictures or videos of the school itself?

The media loves showing videos or imagery of blood and broken glass and shell casing but we have seen anything yet one month after the Sandy Hook incident. The scene was supposed to be so bloody but we see no images of survivors in blood, no bloody footprints from all of the children walking out of the school. There is no photography or press footage of the weapons used. In most after-crime reports, police like to show off the shooter’s personal weapons used for the crime but we see none of this. There is no evidence whatsoever. If Lanza had lived after this incident, what evidence would there be to convict him in a court of law?

There is one blown window shown to the public by the mainstream media.

In one newscast, a blown window can be found at the school. This could be caused by a canister or smoke canister used in a drill. I am not too experienced in this field so I do not know for sure.

WHERE IS THE SURVEILLANCE CAMERA FOOTAGE? The school had a new security system for their front door with video surveillance cameras and would alert the authorities of a break-in. It was a fully closed-in campus that even parents would need to show a photo ID at the front door and then be buzzed into the school after an administrator identified the person. According to the official story, Lanza shot through the glass door to get into the school. Why have we not seen any of this damage or the surveillance video of this? We have seen a lot of graphics and diagrams and aerial footage of the school, but no real photography of the damage. We saw many graphics and diagrams of Sandy Hook Elementary like we did after the Osama bin Laden raid on May 1, 2011.

If Lanza had blown open the front entrance of the school, why did police chief “Kehoe” say the school was completely locked down and needed to break into the school? He was one of the first police officers on the scene, within minutes of a 911 call. Interview available at CBS News:

Why did they not see the front door glass BLOWN OUT if Lanza shot through the door?

There is no video coverage from the Lanza house or neighborhood. Most importantly, no surveillance footage was shown to the public from the school hallways or classrooms. There is no video or photography evidence that Lanza was the shooter. NONE!

It is also odd that there are no recorded 911 calls revealed to the public. Why were there no 911 calls when Lanza supposedly shot the security door open or began shooting through the classrooms? How did the police know that the school was taken over by a shooter and arrived at the scene? If there is a 911 call to the police department, why was it not given to the media and shown to the public for disclosure?

James F. Tracy at memoryholeblog.com makes a great point that there are no “routine eyewitness, photo or video evidence of the crime scene’s aftermath—broken glass, blasted security locks and doors, bullet casings and holes, bloodied walls and floors—all of which are common in such investigations and reportage.”

There is no photography of the almost 600 students (459 to be exact) or all of the parents that would have been needed to come to pick up the kids. There would have been over a thousand people (adults and students) easily in this one area of the fire station. But there are no photos of this. The media loves showing these images repeatedly of crime scenes but we see none of it. At least Columbine showed the children leaving the campus in escorted lines around the buildings.

A real school shooting looks like this in Atlanta. There are hundreds of parents waiting anxiously to know if their child is safe with real feelings of fright and worry in this news interview. In the interview, parents are anxious, cannot stand still and have quick speech and emotion in their voice.

Lt. Paul Vance stated that there were no survivors from the shooting. Even medical personnel and first responders found it strange that there were no wounded from the shooting, all were found dead. Medical personnel were not even allowed to go near the school and were restricted at the fire station though the police made calls for all medical personnel to arrive at the school.

There was 100 % dead of 26 people. I have never heard of a mass shooting where every person shot was pronounced dead. Even in bomb explosions and other massacres, there are usually a higher number of casualties and wounded versus those killed. This means, no victim can talk because dead bodies do not talk.

The way the vehicles were parked at the fire station, it would be absolutely impossible for cars to leave or enter the school because the road was fully blocked. The few ambulances and fire trucks that were situated at the fire station could not move because the road was blocked. This is illegal under federal law. However, with all of the vehicles crowded in looked great on camera to sell the story.

The medical personnel were directed to set up at the fire station 1/3 of a mile away from the school. Medical Responders were not allowed into the school while the police allegedly used golf carts to transport the injured and dead bodies to the responders. Why were the first responders not allowed near the school? Was it to hide evidence that even a shooting occurred.

“When the call came over the radio a little later in the incident saying release the ambulances except for Newtown.”

“Mr. Folan also remembers and sends his thoughts to the dozens of hospital trauma and triage workers also stationed to receive victims who never came.’ I have never seen anything like it. You’d think it was an exercise drill,’ he said.”

This article like many others has been deleted out of fear that the public will research this incident and find the truth about it.

EMTs are loading up equipment on a gurney to an ambulance at 0:35 mark:

Who were the qualified medical practitioners who pronounced the victims dead? It seems as if Carver and his staff were the only medical personnel to attend the victims hours later in a postmortem that seems to have never occurred. The medical examiner seems to not have seen any of the dead children or how they were killed. He seems to wing the postmortem press conference and run out of his lines to say.

Apparently two wounded survivors that do not exist:

Sandy Hook teacher Natalie Hammond finally identified as a victim from the incident two months later.

Carver says that there were no survivors but there were two survivors. May be. Natalie Hammond, one of them, once existed, at least on script. She was the lead teacher at Sandy Hook Elementary School and supposedly shielded a student from Lanza’s shooting. President Obama mentioned her in a speech and she was to be at the State of the Union.

If this person really existed, she would be a hero! Where is the media attention about her? Vance mentions about the two wounded victims days after the shooting but never identifies them! He states that he can’t identify witnesses yet others like Sally Cox were identified!

The two victims were shot in the hand and foot and were expected to recover very quickly. Why do we not hear their side of the Sandy Hook incident? The media could get tons of coverage by revealing their stories and interviewing them. But nothing!

In this newscast and this one, almost three months after the Sandy Hook incident, we see a woman said to be Natalie Hammond with straight, brunette hair. Why did it take so long for us get a view of Hammond? What is her story? Why has she not done any interviews yet? Wher was she at the State of the Union address? Where is the media attention? Can we see her wounds?

A shot victim at Newtown is seen being place in an ambulance but this female victim has short, blond hair and not straight, brunette hair? This woman at the 1:00 mark? It looks like Janet Vollmer. Is there really an empty gurney at 4:10 mark?

Janet Vollmer, mother of Michael Vollmer from Bloomberg LP, is seen on a gurney, not Natalie Hammond.

From Youtube, user danp5648 has been able to put together four different stories told about Natalie Hammond and how her narrative changed over time.

ABC News did a story that there is one female student survivor from one of the first graders’ classrooms we later learned was from Rousseau’s. Police declined to give such information to identify her or her picture. Yet she was not wounded or shot but covered all in blood from head to toe as a pastor said. We do not see an interview with the mother or father of the student, only an interview from a pastor. Why do we only hear second-hand information from a pastor about this story? Is she considered a survivor if she was not wounded and pretended to be dead?

The Courant did a story on Rousseau and how one of her students survived the incident. On December 31, the CT Post also did a story about the little girl who was found alive but then was later taken to the hospital and was pronounced dead.

“The room is full of the bodies of children. But one child, a little girl, still shows signs of life.
A tall, muscular man, Chapman scoops the child into his arms and runs out to find an ambulance. He tells the little girl she is safe, that the police are there to protect her and that she is loved.”

Later in the same article:

“The little girl she and her crew rushed to the hospital is pronounced dead.”

Again, no identity of who this female student was or why there is one story that she survived and another that she was killed.

What is also mysterious is that the medical examiner stated that the most important bodies would be looked at a day later on Saturday. Lt. Paul Vance said that the bodies would be moved on Sunday. However in a surprise, the authorities took the bodies in the middle of the night. The Atlantic Wire reported CNN’s Soledad O’Brien speaking to Vance that the bodies would remain where they were until Sunday.

WordPress user, “More Coffee”, questions the reasoning for lying to the public and then taking the bodies at night: “Why were the bodies removed late at night? Why wasn’t there coverage of a bio-hazard cleaning crew? Why does it seem that every first responder or community member interviewed relates to third party information rather than first hand [sic] information? Why did the police investigator, Lt Vance, issue a gag-order and threaten legal action specifically to those outside the official narrative? Lastly, why did Nancy Lanza have a variety of tactical weapons especially since she is being portrayed as a socialite, and why did she make them accessible to a special needs adult? Why aren’t there updated photos of the alleged gunman and his slain mother?”

Just as oddly, the investigators have decided to not interview the children involved in the incident. “Investigators have decided not to formally interview the children, based on advice from Yale child psychologists” (Sandy Hook Shooter’s Pause May Have Aided Students’ Escape). May be because there was no school shooting and the children would tell the investigators the truth.

]]>https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/sandy-hook-the-clean-crime-scene/feed/60000ab9a_medium-escortquestionsuntamedThere is one blown window shown to the public by the mainstream media.Natalie HammondJanet VollmerHurricane Sandy was a Forewarning, Sandy Hook was a Drillhttps://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/hurricane-sandy-was-a-forewarning/
https://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/hurricane-sandy-was-a-forewarning/#commentsThu, 21 Mar 2013 03:24:48 +0000http://realquestionsnow.wordpress.com/?p=3…

In the later months of 2012 in October, Hurricane Sandy approached the northeastern seaboard. Though downgraded in its strength ranking, the storm pounded New England and devastated thousands of residents in New York, Staten Island and New Jersey. The New England residents were stranded and relied on their community for support as the government, both federal and state, left thousands homeless, cold and wet as many homes were destroyed and swept away by huge ocean swells and leaving them with no electricity for weeks.

Hurricane Sandy was a forewarning for the evil events that would occur at Sandy Hook, CT on December 12, 2012.

Port-o-potties were already set up for the Sandy Hook incident even before the school day started on December 14.

On the surface, the authorities and the mainstream media portray the Sandy Hook incident on December 14, 2012 as the worst massacre in American history by a lone gunman, a 115-pound Asperger’s kid who carried four handguns and a rifle, 200+ rounds of ammunition, SWAT body armor and a black mask, taking a vengeance from his dark and lonely lifestyle on defenseless first graders at Sandy Hook Elementary. He was able to kill 26 adults and children with no survivors and with accuracy as that of a special operations military soldier. According to the official story, he knew how to reload his weapon at least six times in a period of a few minutes.

This narrative has been played out for the past 15 years for mass shootings and bombings in American history. The story goes…a lone gunman on psychotic drugs, a loner with no friends and is addicted to violent video games and hates life.

But this pattern is being long-winded; everyone has heard it all before—beware of the quiet ones. The media, authorities and politicians can say anything and draw the story out, and we are supposed to believe everything that is told to us. However we are the audience. We are the evaluators and analyzers of what is presented to us. Our job is to question and not take everything as point blank truth. How can we believe the politician as if they were the truth seekers that were appointed righteously to rule us?

During the aftermath and wake of the Sandy Hook incident, the media went hyena, supping the solution as gun control. Guns are evil and guns need to be destroyed. The media dropped the entire Sandy Hook shooting incident; it was no longer in the news five days after the incident. It was about gun control officially. They made it as sensational and evoking as many emotions as possible. They splashed that black and white grainy photo of Adam Lanza, the alleged shooter, on every front page rather than better portraits of the young man, and using red, bold key words like “evil killer” and “bloody massacre” in the headlines and pictures of grieving and public support for Newtown. But the entire sensational subject was suddenly dropped like a rock without attachments.

Post-its from Sandy Hook memorial are with the same handwriting, Sharpie pen, and with repetitive phrases.

The media went for gun control as the solution and subject to pounce on although there are thousands of laws on the books for owning guns. Or the fact the framers of the US Constitution, the foundation of the United States and reason why this country is still sovereign under its own rights by God, that the 2nd Amendment shall never be infringed.

There was never once a debate about psychological drugs or the huge pharmaceutical companies. A child with Asperger’s Syndrome with personality imbalances will most likely be on psychological drugs. Why does the media and government protect the medical drug companies?

There were no tough questions to authorities why they kept changing the story on the incident. The media protected the authorities saying it was their fault that there was misinformation about the incident—because news and social media are too fast now and facts cannot be checked within the timely matter. However, in all of the reports, the facts and statements sourced came from unidentified law enforcement officers and authorities. So the media really did not get the information wrong. How could the police get the information wrong when they were the ones telling the story?

But there should be no slack cut for the media. In their reporting, the media never tried to get video or photography coverage of the halls of the school and no surveillance camera footage. We did not see any images of the shooter in the school like at Columbine High School. There were no tough questions to the police about why a drug dealer’s vehicle was at the crime scene or why it was said to be Lanza’s car when the plates were registered to Christopher A. Rodia from Florida. There was no follow-up reporting about why witnesses reported 2-4 gunmen the day of the shooting but the authorities the next day pronounced only one gunman.

Do you see 500 children in the Sandy Hook Firehouse?

In this day and age, it is very easy for the media to manipulate a story or emergency situation. We see it in our movies and t.v. shows. Change the camera angles, don’t show that perspective, say this, don’t say that, skip that information, they don’t need to know about that. When we read the newspaper, we have our trust in what we read as if this was actually what happened and journalists are doing their job asking those tough questions. But in the past decade, the government is more and more telling reporters what to say, giving out press releases with the facts and information to use, and portraying lies and half-truths as real truths and reality. In today’s status quo, if a journalist or reporter tries to question authority and what the government says, they will be fired from their job. This is why there are so many independent journalists today. They want to tell the truth and question known liars and corrupt politicians, the job of the reporter!

And if guns were so bad, in the heat of the gun control debate, why did the media rarely cover the high school shooting on Thursday, January 10? There was a high school shooting at Taft Union High School in Kern County, yet where is all of the media attention? The shooting only received local attention when a student used a 12-guage shotgun on a classmate and teacher. Student, teacher shot at Taft High School

Only those events staged by the government (false-flag attacks) receive the most media attention and hype. The event in Kern County was only received by local news even though a student shot a student and teacher with a shotgun. To my knowledge, no national news organization picked it up in the middle of gun control debates!

My hypothesis, like many others, is that the government, the state troopers and Newtown Police Department and the media are not telling the truth nor did they try to. The incident at Sandy Hook Elementary on December 14 was not a massacre by a lone gunman but a FEMA and State Exercise drill at the Elementary School. The incident was a staged false-flag ran by Homeland Security and ordered by the US Federal Government.

An event like Sandy Hook would be called a FSE (Full Scale Emergency) drill with the coordination by Homeland Security and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). FEMA runs shooter drills and evacuation training at schools in select towns and schools. They are called HSEEP (Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program).

During a t.v. Interview, Gene Rosen is standing in front of a sign for all the actors to sign in at the Sandy Hook Firehouse. If it was not a drill, wouldn’t it say, “Parents please check-in first”?

Within FSE drills, FEMA will use trained actors and volunteers from the local population to simulate a real-world situation for trained military personnel, police officers and first responders to practice their training. The exercise needs to be as close to reality as possible. Seconds count in timely emergencies when minutes kill.

Training exercises and drills will simulate terrorist events, bombings, shot down airlines, mass shootings in malls and schools, and nuclear, chemical and biological attacks. The trained actors and volunteers will pretend to be police, medical personnel, firefighters, construction workers, the hurt, injured, hostages or victims, and maybe even the terrorists and attackers in these events.

An acting group called, Crisis Actors, is used in association with FEMA and must be qualified under FEMA requirements as stated on their website, http://crisisactors.org/. The group’s moto is, “Trained Players and Actors Making It Real”. These are the exact type of groups of actors that FEMA employs for their drills and exercises.

Oddly enough, FEMA ran a course for protecting children in emergencies at Bridgeport, CT only 20 miles from Newtown and during the same hours as the Sandy Hook incident (9:00 am – 4:00 pm EST). The drill was called, “Planning for the Needs of Children in Disaster”. The course’s emphasis was to enable participants improve and prepare their community’s responses to emergencies and help provide assurance and protection to children crises.

This is actually an eerie coincidence that there was a training exercise for FEMA the same day and time in Bridgeport as a shooting 20 miles away. There seems to be a pattern of this occurring continually in mass shootings and bombings. In Aurora, CO, the same day James Holmes had allegedly shot up the Aurora movie theater, a medical school 16 miles away practice emergency and disaster drills, including how to respond if a shooter attacks a movie theater with guns and bombs. Real life shooting imitates training exercise at Parker medical school

In nearby Putnam County, CT, an Emergency Response Team (ERT) was already assembled for regular training in Carmel and was engaged that very moment in a mock drill of an active-shooter at a school as the Sandy Hook incident. Southeast-BresterPatch

In London on 7/7/2005, there was also a training exercise about terrorists bombing the Tube stations. However, this actually occurred during when the drills were taking place. The drills were the same as the bombings and the same metro trains were targeted! On 9/11/2001, FEMA also set up on New York Harbor a day before the attack on the World Trade Center. The Pentagon was also running the same drills with the military that airliners had crashed into the WTC and had called NOMAD down so the Air Force response was slow to the attacks during the same time as the real planes crashed into the towers!

At the 3:10 mark of this video, when the police are checking the shed, the police were not speaking English, it sounds like Russian or Hebrew. FEMA drills will also incorporate different international military teams and police officers.

The school was a perfect place to center a false-flag staged event—it is isolated, no streets or houses around it, only trees and fields. The town is small with a population of about 2,000 people with a lot of sparse land and forests between neighbors. The school was very isolated, surrounded by hills and forests. The closest neighbor, Gene Rosen, lived a mile away. This means the local population would not be able to easily record the events at the school and the news media was restricted at the fire station, a 1/3 mile away from the school. No one would be able to take pictures or video record any of the activity at the school.

It is also weird that not one family or any Sandy Hook Elementary parents have come forward with a lawsuit against the school district or state of CT for the lack of security or that the $500,000 newly installed security at the school failed to protect the children.

This means the school would be fully secured and the government and law enforcement could keep the public and media from seeing what was happening. We would be at the mercy of the police and media, our only option to believe what they would tell us.