The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Judge J. Leon Holmes. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before the District Judge, you must, at the same time that you file your written objections, include the following:

1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.

2. Why the evidence proffered at the hearing before the District Judge (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge.

3. The detail of any testimony desired to be introduced at the hearing before the District Judge in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the hearing before the District Judge.

From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing, either before the Magistrate Judge or before the District Judge.

Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to:

DISPOSITION

I. INTRODUCTION

Michael Simpson is a federal inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Forrest City, who initially filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction on March 4, 2014 (Doc. No. 1). Pursuant to the Court's May 16, 2014, Order, the Motion was filed as a Complaint and served against the Bureau of Prisons (Doc. No. 8). The Court then granted Plaintiff's Motion to Amend his Complaint, to assert a claim of denial of adequate medical care and treatment against Defendants Charles Miller, M. Wingo, and B. Wooten, pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (Doc. No. 40).[1]

Pending before the Court is the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, a Brief in Support, and a Statement of Facts (Doc. Nos. 65-67), to which Plaintiff filed ...

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.