Urban revitalization does not at first glance relate to the
growing national interest in fresh fruits and vegetables. But the
Pennsylvania-based Food Trust views the supermarket as the
perfect starting point for improving the commercial viability of a
neighborhood. When the group launched back in 1992, it was originally dedicated
to expanding farmers' markets throughout Philadelphia. Today, the group is
working tirelessly to eliminate food deserts--areas
without any access to "real" food.

To accomplish this goal, the Food Trust is working with
Pennsylvania lawmakers to develop a series of public/private partnerships that
address food access problems. One such program is the Fresh Food Financing Initiative, a
grant and loan program that encourages supermarkets to open in underserved
areas. The group is also working on nutrition policy for Philadelphia schools
and is helping corner stores improve their produce offerings. Yael Lehmann, The Food
Trust's executive director, spoke with
The Atlantic about what supermarkets can accomplish for cities
nationwide.

How did The
Food Trust start?

Duane Perry, the founder of The Food Trust, used to manage the
Reading Terminal market in Philadelphia. It's a really cool market, with every
kind of food you could possibly want. Right around 1992, he had a light bulb go
off: "Reading Terminal Market is such a great asset to Philadelphia, but I
really wish there could be Reading Terminals all across the city." He'd
heard from people at the market that they'd taken two buses to get there--he
knew that in most of the neighborhoods outside Center City, people had to
travel vast distances to find fresh produce.

So he founded The Food Trust, and first thing we did was open
farmers' markets in low-income areas that had no access to fresh and affordable
food. We still run about 30 farmers markets, and we accept food stamps at all
of those markets.

Nearly 20
years after The Food Trust was founded, how has our understanding of food availability
changed?

It's certainly new for people to be aware of what we now call a
"food desert." When I first began working with Duane Perry, we had to
spend a lot of time showing people maps, showing them the evidence. Of course,
when we spoke to the folks who actually lived in those neighborhoods, they were
acutely aware that there was no fresh food available.

Beginning around 2002, we put a lot of effort into showing people
how serious the problem was in Philadelphia, and showing that it had serious
health consequences. The areas where there was no access to fresh food also had
the highest rates of diet-related deaths. After we launched our first report, showing a
connection between health and food access, people started to pay attention
here. City council members and state representatives were surprised. They
hadn't seen anything like that. So we started to feel some movement and some
mobilization.

Has
increased national awareness of nutrition, discussed most prominently by
Michelle Obama, factored into your work?

We're thrilled that the First Lady has embraced this approach as
part of her campaign to end childhood obesity. As part of her Let's
Move program, she includes something called the Healthy Food Financing Initiative, which has the goal of eliminating food deserts in seven years.
This national initiative will invest $400 million the first year, and it will
be based on our Fresh Food Financing Initiative here in Pennsylvania. We
started our program in 2004, and six years later, there have been 83 projects.
The results are so exciting: half a million people who didn't have access to
fresh food now do. We brought grocery stores into neighborhoods that hadn't had
them for 20 years. When the First Lady and other folks at the White House saw
that this could really work, they got excited. They can see that the investment
really pays.

Is there
something unique about Philadelphia's food access problems that make The Food
Trust especially significant there?

There truly was a crisis in that so many people lacked access to
fresh food. For change to occur, there has to be that urgency, that feeling of
"We can't wait on this anymore. We have to do something." Along with that, we have a few
different visionaries here, like Representative Dwight Evans. Another thing
that's great about this area--and this is crucial--is that we were able to engage
the grocery operators themselves. That wouldn't necessarily be the case
everywhere. So all of these things converged with a remarkable result.

Lately
you've been working on improving healthy offerings in the iconic corner store.
How are you going about this?

We truly feel that this has to be a comprehensive approach. It's
really about trying to make it as easy as possible for people to eat healthy.
You try and hit it from multiple angles. So we work in schools, improving the
food choices; our school programs have been shown to reduce childhood obesity
by 50%. But one of the things the teachers told us was that kids just went and
shopped at the corner store after school. They could buy a ton of calories for
not a lot of money. The baseline results from one of the research studies that
we're doing right now shows that kids get more than 600 calories every time
they go to the corner store.

There's a lot of interest across the country on what we can do
with corner stores, especially those located near schools. We just received
stimulus funding to work in 1000 stores in Philadelphia. Before that, we were
working with just 40. The level of intervention ranges from transforming a
place top to bottom to just making sure it has at least one unit of
refrigeration that can hold fresh fruit salads.

Is providing
access enough? For people who haven't ever learned how to cook, do you also
need to provide outreach?

We've also started doing supermarket tours. It can be pretty
complex for anybody, including me, to make sense of food labels, especially
since there's a lot of misleading marketing. We have started doing nutrition
education at supermarkets. For foodservice folks, there has been a need to do
some education. We recently arranged a knife skills class.

But I don't want to perpetuate the stereotype that somehow I can
teach other people how to eat. This is really an equity issue. I think we all
deserve some of the basic things in life. I think we all deserve to be able to
get food from the grocery store in our neighborhood.

Do you
confront criticism that you're not doing enough when it comes to sustainable,
organic foods?

We are increasingly trying to see how we can incorporate local
food into grocery stores and corner stores. I think there's a lot of potential
there. But not everyone can grow eggplant in the backyard. If you're going to
try to solve the problem of food deserts across the country, there has to be a
large solution to a large problem.

Have you
seen neighborhoods change as a result of introducing supermarkets?

There are numerous examples. Progress Plaza is the nation's oldest
African American -owned and -developed shopping center. Until recently, the
Plaza had a Radio Shack and a dollar store and that's about it. The area hadn't
had a supermarket in over 10 years. But then this new Fresh Grocer came up. And if you saw the plaza now, you wouldn't recognize it.
Supermarkets really do serve as anchors. Now there are all these gorgeous
stores on the plaza, and it looks amazing.

We're about to launch a city program in New Orleans. There was
already a food access problem there before Katrina, but afterward, the city
lost about half of its grocery stores. And when talking to city council, the
only thing that has worked to bring residents back to a neighborhood is bringing
in a supermarket. It makes people happy to live in the neighborhood, and it
also brings confidence. It brings shoppers and therefore other businesses, and
pretty soon you get into this really great cycle where everybody's winning.
More people are shopping, more businesses are opening, and nobody has to take
buses anymore to get a bag of groceries.

About the Author

Most Popular

The former California governor called President Trump’s attacks on the late Arizona senator “absolutely unacceptable.”

Arnold Schwarzenegger and John McCain saw in each other a willingness to buck the Republican Party and became fast friends and political allies. Mindful of McCain’s legacy, the former California governor said on Wednesday that he couldn’t stay silent in the face of President Donald Trump’s recent spate of attacks on the late senator.

He told me that Trump’s swipes at McCain are both disgraceful and destructive. “He was just an unbelievable person,” Schwarzenegger said. “So an attack on him is absolutely unacceptable if he’s alive or dead—but even twice as unacceptable since he passed away a few months ago. It doesn’t make any sense whatsoever to do that. I just think it’s a shame that the president lets himself down to that kind of level. We will be lucky if everyone in Washington followed McCain’s example, because he represented courage.”

Two years ago, Desmond Hughes heard so many of his favorite podcasters extolling AirPods, Apple’s tiny, futuristic $170 wireless headphones, that he decided they were worth the splurge. He quickly became a convert.

Hughes is still listening to podcasters talk about their AirPods, but now they’re complaining. The battery can no longer hold a charge, they say, rendering them functionally useless. Apple bloggers agree: “AirPods are starting to show their age for early adopters,” Zac Hall, an editor at 9to5Mac, wrote in a post in January, detailing how he frequently hears a low-battery warning in his AirPods now. Earlier this month, Apple Insider tested a pair of AirPods purchased in 2016 against a pair from 2018, and found that the older pair died after two hours and 16 minutes. “That’s less than half the stated battery life for a new pair,” the writer William Gallagher concluded.

A plant virus distributes its genes into eight separate segments that can all reproduce, even if they infect different cells.

It is a truth universally acknowledged among virologists that a single virus, carrying a full set of genes, must be in want of a cell. A virus is just a collection of genes packaged into a capsule. It infiltrates and hijacks a living cell to make extra copies of itself. Those daughter viruses then bust out of their ailing host, and each finds a new cell to infect. Rinse, and repeat. This is how all viruses, from Ebola to influenza, are meant to work.

But Stéphane Blanc and his colleagues at the University of Montpellier have shown that one virus breaks all the rules.

Faba bean necrotic stunt virus, or FBNSV for short, infects legumes, and is spread through the bites of aphids. Its genes are split among eight segments, each of which is packaged into its own capsule. And, as Blanc’s team has now shown, these eight segments can reproduce themselves, even if they infect different cells. FBNSV needs all of its components, but it doesn’t need them in the same place. Indeed, this virus never seems to fully come together. It is always distributed, its existence spread between capsules and split among different host cells.

Just because some people allegedly cheated the system doesn’t mean the system is defensible.

Like most other college presidents, R. Gerald Turner, the head of Southern Methodist University, where my son is a student, sends correspondence only when something goes terribly wrong. When I received a mass email from his office this week, I assumed the school had gotten caught up in the fallout of Operation Varsity Blues, the college-admissions cheating and bribery scandal that came to light last week.

But Turner’s missive turned out to be preemptive instead of apologetic. The scandal offered SMU “an opportunity to add to the ongoing review of our process,” he wrote. The university, he explained, must rely on the accuracy of materials submitted by students, including SAT scores. Turner announced that the university intended to review the records of any students associated with “The Key,” the college-counseling firm run by William Singer, the alleged fixer who is accused of paying bribes, facilitating cheats, and creating fraudulent materials to help wealthy parents get their kids into elite schools such as Stanford, Yale, and the University of Southern California.

As other social networks wage a very public war against misinformation, it’s thriving on Instagram.

When Alex, now a high-school senior, saw an Instagram account he followed post about something called QAnon back in 2017, he’d never heard of the viral conspiracy theory before. But the post piqued his interest, and he wanted to know more. So he did what your average teenager would do: He followed several accounts related to it on Instagram, searched for information on YouTube, and read up on it on forums.

A year and a half later, Alex, who asked to use a pseudonym, runs his own Gen Z–focused QAnon Instagram account, through which he educates his generation about the secret plot by the “deep state” to take down Donald Trump. “I was just noticing a lack in younger people being interested in QAnon, so I figured I would put it out there that there was at least one young person in the movement,” he told me via Instagram direct message. He hopes to “expose the truth about everything corrupt governments and organizations have lied about.” Among those truths: that certain cosmetics and foods contain aborted fetal cells, that the recent Ethiopian Airlines crash was a hoax, and that the Christchurch, New Zealand mosque shootings were staged.

Donald Cline must have thought no one would ever know. Then DNA testing came along.

Updated at 5:23 p.m. ET on March 18, 2019.

The first Facebookmessage arrived when Heather Woock was packing for vacation, in August 2017. It was from a stranger claiming to be her half sibling. She assumed the message was some kind of scam; her parents had never told her she might have siblings. But the message contained one detail that spooked her. The sender mentioned a doctor, Donald Cline. Woock knew that name; her mother had gone to Cline for fertility treatments before she was born. Had this person somehow gotten her mother’s medical history?

Her mom said not to worry. So Woock, who is 33 and lives just outside Indianapolis, flew to the West Coast for her vacation. She got a couple more messages from other supposed half siblings while she was away. Their persistence was strange. But then her phone broke, and she spent the next week and a half outdoors in Seattle and Vancouver, blissfully disconnected.

Year after year, Stuyvesant High has abysmal enrollment rates for black and Latino students. But the debate over admissions reform is brimming with misunderstandings.

On Monday, another admissions scandal injected a new dose of disillusionment into the already disillusioned world of elite education. This time the revelations concern not higher education, but Stuyvesant High and New York City’s other elite public high schools. Of the 895 current eighth graders who secured a spot in next year's Stuyvesant freshman class, just seven identify as African American.

Every year, reports show abysmally low numbers of black or Latino students at all eight of the city’s elite specialized high schools whose admissions rely solely on a standardized exam. City officials including Mayor Bill de Blasio have led an ongoing, multifaceted effort to solve the problem through recruitment initiatives and a summer enrichment program designed to shepherd low-income youth into the rigorous institutions, but enrollment numbers remain disappointing.

When the two strangers accosted Chelsea Clinton, she was attending an NYU vigil for the Muslims murdered by a terrorist in Christchurch, New Zealand. “This right here is the result of a massacre stoked by people like you and the words that you put out into the world,” one declared as the other recorded the encounter. “I want you to know that, and I want you to feel that deep down inside. Forty-nine people died because of the rhetoric you put out there.”

The accuser’s blend of callous indignation and extravagant nonsense brought to mind charges that Chelsea’s parents murdered Vince Foster or that her mother committed treason when the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was attacked. But these critics weren’t right-wingers parroting talk radio. They were leftist NYU students.

The camera flies high above the palm trees of Hollywood, soaring north and west, all the way to the suburb of Simi Valley, where it slows down to seek out a certain street, and then slows some more until it finds a particular house. It hovers above it, and then swoops down, pushing in all the way to the doorstep, where it rests, impatient. It is the house where James Safechuck, one of the two men at the center of Leaving Neverland, an HBO documentary, grew up, but in a way it might as well be the Darlings’ house: “Peter Pan chose this particular house because there were people here who believed in him.”

But the Safechucks are not the only people who believe, because here is another suburban house, and here again is that seeking, searching intelligence, the camera pushing closer and closer. It is the house in Brisbane, Australia, where the other subject of the documentary, Wade Robson, grew up. The implication is clear: Michael Jackson could have any little boy in the world; all he needed were parents who would serve up their sons to him.

Lots of American families fight, but most are unlikely to fight about politics: In a study released last month on the extent to which Americans live in “bubbles,” 39 percent of respondents said they see political diversity within their families, as my colleague Emma Green reported. Meanwhile, “roughly three-quarters of Americans’ interactions with people from another political party happen at work,” and “less than half of respondents said they encounter political differences among their friends.” In other words, though the Thanksgiving Day family political argument is a beloved media trope, it’s not a reality for many families.

That said, some Americans do have political divides within their family—Kellyanne Conway and her husband, George, for example, have recently made headlines for having a spousal disagreement over politics on a very public stage. And for such families, the disagreements that result can be all the more painful, placing siblings or parents and children at odds with one another. In recent years, as political temperatures have risen, this has only become more common. In 2019, 35 percent of Republicans and 45 percent of Democrats said they would be unhappy if their child married someone of the opposing political party—a sharp increase from attitudes 50 years ago.