You seem to be missing my point here. It's not that unusual for a team not to score a touchdown from within the red zone and have to settle for a field goal.

What is unusual is for a game to have 3 touchdowns resulting from interceptions.

The total never looked like going over and in the end only just went over, and you were extremely unlucky to lose your bet.

Dont agree m8 Philly should of had another 14 points on the board at h/t they had great chances- when a team has 1st and goal and has the likes of Westbrook in their offense playing a shit team like Cleveland you shouldnt think a FG is good from that position also to throw a couple of interceptions when 1st and goal or around the redzone means 0 points so i was lucky i guess in that way to keep the score down to a minimum going in at h/t, , so for me to still be in with a good chance with my bet was lucky, obviously it didnt matter in the end, i hate to lose bets and money and blame myself when i lose not luck

lol
first of they were only 2 interceptions directly returned for touchdowns

and it may be not unusual to settle for Fgs in the redzone but to turn the ball over twice (one on a trick play) inside the 5 yard line in back 2 back posessions definitely is unusual

that total looked like going over with Phillys scoring ability alone and the pace wasnt slow, it was unlucky how things ended up with a 0.5 loss, INT Tds made up for bad plays which should have resulted in Tds and points, it evens it out... thats the nature of a football game, Special Teams and Defense are there for a reason in American Football..they can score points and win games, you see this week in and week out, nothing unsual with that