What Is the Proper Way to Interpret Mold Reports

Mold Reports

What Is the Proper Way to Interpret Mold ReportsBy Dr. Harriet Burge, EMLab P&K’s Director of Aerobiology

When samples are sent to the lab for analysis, the recovered data is presented to you in a report that provides concentrations or presence/absence information for the organisms of interest. Figuring out what all of the columns mean can be a challenge. However, some of this data can be very helpful in interpreting the data.

Most spore trap reports include columns for the amount of air sampled, the number of spores counted, an extrapolation of this count if only part of the slide was counted, and a calculation of spores/m3 of air for each type of spore. In some cases only the extrapolation count is presented. Let’s assume that the entire sample was counted and the actual number of spores seen is recorded on the report.

The amount of air sampled is usually listed in liters. The number of liters sampled is derived from the flow rate of the sampling device (often between 10 and 15 liters/min) and the length of time the sampler was operated. So if you collect a 5 minute sample at 15 liters/minute you have collected 75 liters of air.

Concentrations are listed on the report in terms of spores/m3 of air. Therefore, the number of spores counted is converted to spores/m3 by dividing the spore count by the amount of air sampled in cubic meters.

So how does this information help you? Let’s say the report lists a concentration of 13 Stachybotrysspores/m3 of air. How many actual spores were counted to reach this number? We look at the spore count for Stachybotrys and see that only a single spore was seen. With only a single spore captured on a sample there is a significant chance that that one spore was the only one present in the entire room. It could also represent the calculated concentration, or it could be a gross underestimate of the actual number. These situations have similar probabilities. Note that if you had collected a 10 minute sample at 15 liters/minute you would have collected 150 liters or 0.150m3, and if only one spore were seen, the calculated concentration would be about 7 spores/m3.

Statistically, the probability of a calculated number representing the actual concentration becomes significant at an actual count of about 10 spores. This represents a concentration for a 5 minute sample at 75 liters/min of 133 and for a 10 minute sample 67. This explains, in part, why we tend to consider spore counts less than 200 of little quantitative importance, regardless of the taxon.

Of course, concentrations are not the only aspect of the data that are important. The consistent presence of even low levels of some taxa is likely to indicate growth somewhere in the space. For example,Stachybotrys tends to be found in very low levels and infrequently in outdoor air. If it is consistently present in indoor air then an indoor source is probably present. Remember, however, that as far as exposure is concerned, low concentrations of these fungi are not of concern.

Now let’s consider a dust sample analyzed quantitatively for culturable fungi or bacteria. On the dust sample report will be columns that indicate how much dust was actually used in the assay, how many colonies were recovered, and the calculated colony forming units/gram of dust. So you send in a sample that weighs 1 gram.

In the laboratory the dust is sieved, then a small portion is separated for analysis. This small portion we will say for simplicity’s sake is 100 milligrams. The sample is suspended in liquid (let’s say 1ml) and 0.1 ml of this suspension is placed on a culture plate. This is a simplification of the process but should suffice for this discussion.

As an example, let’s assume you recover 10 fungal colonies on the plate. What does this mean in terms of cfu(colony forming units)/gram of dust? In order to discover this concentration we have to account for the small amount of dust actually used in the analysis and for the small amount of the suspended sample we used for plating. If we used 100mg of dust (0.1g, and 0.1 ml of the suspension then we have to multiply the 10 colonies by 100 (or divide by 0.1×0.1=0.01. Thus, our result is 1,000 cfu/gram of dust. Actually, we would report cfu/gram of dust for individual taxa.

So if we had 1 Stachybotrys spore on the culture plate, the final concentration of Stachybotrys colony forming units would be 100 per gram of dust. This sounds like a significant number, but note that it is based on a single Stachybotrys colony.

In actual practice, most labs dilute the original suspension by factors of 10 and incubate all of the plates. Then the plate with the most appropriate number of colonies for each taxon is chosen for calculating cfus. If the most concentrated dilution (which is essentially 1:10) is overloaded, then the 1:100 plate (or a higher dilution) is chosen. This procedure sometimes leads to low counts for individual taxa, especially if there is an abundance of one fast growing fungus. In these cases, as discussed above, it is important to consider the low colony counts if quantitative assessments are being made.

The bottom line: it is important to note the number of spores or colony forming units on which the reported concentrations for any type of quantitative sampling are based. If the number of spores or colonies (by taxon) is less than 10, then extreme caution should be used in interpreting the data quantitatively.

This article originally appeared in the January 2010 issue ofIndoor Environment Connections. Reprinted by permission.

About Dr. Harriet Burge
Dr. Harriet Burge is EMlab P&K’s Director of Aerobiology and Chair of EMLab P&K’s Scientific Advisory Board. Widely considered the leading expert in indoor air quality (IAQ), Dr. Burge pioneered the field more than 30 years ago. She has served as a member of three National Academy of Sciences committees for IAQ, including as Vice-Chair of the Committee on the Health Effects of Indoor Allergens.View Dr. Burge’s Curriculum Vitae.

The data and other information contained in this newsletter are provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. EMLab P&K hereby disclaims any liability for any and all direct, indirect, punitive, incidental, special or consequential damages arising out of the use or interpretation of the data or other information contained in, or any actions taken or omitted in reliance upon, this newsletter. Images included in this newsletter are property of EMLab P&K, unless otherwise specified.

Mold Reports What Is the Proper Way to Interpret Mold Reports By Dr. Harriet Bur...

Ratings

Not Cheap but Allied was very fast in showing up and getting the cleaning job done even on a Sunday.

4.0 rating

December 30, 2018

Allied was very fast in showing up and getting the cleaning job done even on a Sunday.
The pricing of the service may be a little steep if you get the fans for several days, you may want to check the contract accurately to avoid misunderstandings. Support responds very promptly.

stefano g

This folks are real pros !. Quick,Careful,efficient and tremendously considerate.

5.0 rating

December 30, 2018

This folks are real pros !. Quick,Careful,efficient and tremendously considerate.
They left everything like new and helped me deal with the insurance reviewer!
I would not go anywhere else.

Raul G

5 stars to the team at Allied. Geronimo and his partner saved the day when they came to my home after a severe leak had damaged my closet and bedroom.

5.0 rating

December 30, 2018

5 stars to the team at Allied. Geronimo and his partner saved the day when they came to my home after a severe leak had damaged my closet and bedroom. They acted quickly and professionally to dry the rooms out and prepare them for being restored. I was so pleased and relieved to work with this team. This includes the professionalism of Misty who took my initial call. She knew how stressed I was and was right there to help me with a plan of action – all leading to a great result! Thanks so much! Sarah in Santa Rosa

sarah G

ur 370-unit property uses Allied exclusively. The entire team is very responsive and informative. Prices are competitive.

5.0 rating

December 30, 2018

Our 370-unit property uses Allied exclusively. The entire team is very responsive and informative. Prices are competitive. Moreover, Allied’s workmanship is excellent and thorough.
Allied also works seamlessly with our insurance adjusters on larger projects

Michael G

BRAVO - job well done! Discovered a flood at home in San Francisco - water had been over flowing a 2nd floor sink for 15 hours

5.0 rating

December 30, 2018

BRAVO – job well done! Discovered a flood at home in San Francisco – water had been over flowing a 2nd floor sink for 15 hours. Contacted Allied, signed work order on line and workers were at the house within 15 minutes. They brought a truck load of equipment to mitigate the damage. Drying fans were installed, heating pads were placed on hardwood floors, walls and ceilings were opened and drying and dehumidifying tubes installed. Excellent, professional care. Very pleased with their swift delivery of emergency service AND their attention to detail to ensure the water damage was dried out completely.