Originally posted by jfj123
Those images were from an advanced physics model created at Purdue University. Can you disprove the model? Please post your equations that
disqualify the video. I await with bated breath

Please show how the model is valid, if there are no wings or engines pictured?

The model did not use any advanced physics at all. If so, it would have included wings and engines, etc for the plane. Without wings and engines,
basic physics dictates that the plane won't even leave the runway.

Originally posted by WraothAscendant
I have already shown you pictures of the plane's BODY IN THE BUILDING

But the nose, wings and tail did not make it into the building as shown in the photos you posted.

Originally posted by jfj123]
But your own pictures show the body made it into the building???? So you obviously agree with us.

No, it shows the hole left by the plane and that the wings barley made it into the building. The steel where the wings went in are barely damaged, the
wings would have been sheared by the steel beams as stated dozens of times.

Also f you look at the actual photos of the hole i posted you will see the wing tips did not even penatrate the outter steel beams of the building.

Originally posted by jfj123
Those images were from an advanced physics model created at Purdue University. Can you disprove the model? Please post your equations that
disqualify the video. I await with bated breath

Please show how the model is valid, if there are no wings or engines pictured?

The model did not use any advanced physics at all. If so, it would have included wings and engines, etc for the plane. Without wings and engines,
basic physics dictates that the plane won't even leave the runway.

Originally posted by jfj123
We're not watching the same video because the video I watched shows the plane body

No it just shows a piece of the body that just barely made it into the building and as supported by almost all reports the buildings withstood the
planes imapcts.

(ALSO ITS JUST A PIECE OF THE BODY WITHOUT NOSE, WINGS AND TAIL THAT DID NOT MAKE IT INTO THE BUILDING BECAUSE THE THIN ALUMINUM WAS SHREDDED BY THE
STEEL BEAMS AS STATED MANY, MANY TIMES AND PROVEN BY THE VIDEO AND THE ACTAUL PHOTOS OF THE HOLES IN THE TOWERS.)

Here we go again. Hop scotching back to a debate you already lost that led to this one in the first place......................................
Heard of circular logic but circular argumenting?

Yes it withstood the impacts for the gazillionith time.
But the structural damage from the impacts were aggraviated by the fire.

Cumulative damage seeing as to how the building couldn't auto-heal itself after a impact.

And off we go again. Or should I just cut and paste the back and forth fromt he history of this debate? So you can spew the same falsities you spewed
before we moved to this point. And as we have shown you BLATANTLY doing, particularly in the case of this perdue video.

Complete counter-debunking of every single debunked hypothesis that the "Truthers" have put forth over the years. I'm a firm believer in Occam's
Razor--and as ashamed of my country as it makes me to admit it, the idea that they screwed up just makes more sense to me than the idea that the whole
thing was some elaborately staged drama.

I'm beginning to think there might be something to this conspiracy business. Here's why:

Noone could possibly be as obtuse as the most vocal of proponents pretend to be. Ergo, they are pretending to be obtuse. So it's either for personal
financial gain (like they are selling a product), blinding ego (they are the keepers of the hidden knowledge -- smarter than all before them), or --
and here's where it gets spooky -- they are paid by the government to be soooo obnoxious that a real conspiracy would never be noticed because most
people with common sense won't take more than a peak at the "evidence" presented before recoiling.

So take heart, you few, proud, and vocal -- I don't think you're as dumb as you're acting!

I think you misunderestimate human stupidity.
EDIT: And also human egotism. I used to be one of those folks--self-absorbed, whiny teenagers who can't get over how they're Rebels Who Will Not
Stay Silent. Now, I'm twenty, and I finally understand why teenagers can't do certain things--they're freaking morons.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.