Across the globe, economists and politicians continually debate the pros and cons of minimum wage. Among the many arguments, leaders express concern over encouraging outsourcing, ensuring workers can make a living, keeping market prices low, interfering with natural supply and demand, and the ability of new workers to gain experience. Each of the issues presented have varying affects on the global economy, the gross domestic product of individual countries, and regional job growth.

Supporters of minimum wage laws often default to citing labor abuses and concerns over living wages. Workers must make enough to support themselves and their families, they argue. If left unchecked, businesses and corporations might take advantage of unskilled laborers, young or migrant workers, as well as immigrants. These workers typically only have enough skills to qualify them for minimum wage positions, leaving them vulnerable to businesses that capitalize on a lack of government regulation.

Opponents of a minimum wage typically point to the potential disadvantage of outsourcing work to lower-paying countries, job growth statistics based on supply and demand, new workers, and the effects of wages on prices. According to opponents, countries with high minimum wages cannot compete with other nations on price, owing to the increased cost of production. As such, these countries often outsource low-paying work to other countries with lower wage standards, taking jobs and tax revenues away from the local economy.

Ad

Theories about the pros and cons of minimum wage in relation to supply and demand expound the virtues of allowing the demand for and interest of workers to determine wages. Should a business offer exceptionally high wages, the number of people competing for the job rises, while interest often decreases the lower wages go. The same principle means young or otherwise inexperienced workers have the ability to gain experience at a lower wage level without as much concern over experience, according to minimum wage opponents. Companies benefit by hiring more workers at a lower pay, increasing production and service quality without increasing prices, while simultaneously providing valuable work experience to new workers.

Every generation debates these pros and cons, using slightly different examples and current economic concerns. Issues become more or less of a concern, and resulting debates gain proportionate media attention, based on the overall economic health for each generation. When economic conditions are strained, the debates typically gain more attention, with less attention gained during strong economic conditions. Although specific examples change, the core arguments remain constant across eras and generations.

Discuss this Article

croydonPost 3

@pleonasm - I know a lot of people where their sole income comes from minimum wage jobs and they have trouble making ends meet as it is. If they weren't protected by minimum wage laws and earned even less than they do now, they might end up on the street.

To be honest, my view is, if you can't afford to pay people a decent wage, you can't afford to do business here, so get out. It makes me angry that we allow people to outsource so much work as it is, because you know most of the money they save is just going into some rich person's pockets.

pleonasmPost 2

@Fa5t3r - Most of the time though minimum wage applies to part-time jobs, or very low skill jobs, or entry level jobs, and either the company isn't making something expensive in the first place (because that takes skill, which generally requires higher wages) or the person in the job isn't dependent on the job for all their income.

So it's kind of a moot point. When you look at a fast food restaurant, all their workers are making minimum wage, but if they were making less they would still be buying from that restaurant. The extra money makes no difference.

Fa5t3rPost 1

To me, it's a simple matter of economics. Yes, I know it's possible that companies may outsource if they can't find cheap labor in their own country. But doing so, or paying their local workers poor wages, is actually undermining their own business.

Most of the time a business is selling something and most of the time their customers are the ones who are actually working for them. The more money they have, the more money they have to spend.

I think the clear example of this was Ford, who started paying decent rates to all their workers and suddenly began selling more cars, because they were giving their workers the money to put back into the company.

Post your comments

Please enter the code:

Login

Register

Make changes/additions/deletions to the article below, and one of our editors will publish your suggestions if warranted.

Optional: Explanation of your recommended changes

Thank You!

One of our editors will review your suggestion and make changes if warranted.
Note that depending on the number of suggestions we receive,
this can take anywhere from a few hours to a few days.
Thank you for helping to improve wiseGEEK!