[gnso-sti]

Re: [gnso-sti] RE: Draft STI Report - V3 for your review

To: "'GNSO STI'" <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>

Subject: Re: [gnso-sti] RE: Draft STI Report - V3 for your review

From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:47:30 -0500

Well those words were actually mine, so I do support them, but I note
that my preference was to delete all of the minority opinions in the
right column as including some but not others gives them a level of
relative importance that I do not think is appropriate. In the case
of At-Large, we will not have an approved minority report for several
days, and I would like to think they will not be treated as
second-class comments because of their placement.

Your comment about making it more difficult to focus on the substance
of the report is also true.

Alan
At 08/12/2009 08:21 PM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:

Margie,
....

I think you had it right when you wrote the following statement
"Those minority opinions that were know at the time this Report was
written are included. Others may be appended by Stakeholder Groups
prior to the vote of the GNSO Council"