Thread Tools

Two "professional" writers sound more like insecure teenagers, instantly penning articles that the Ravens have no chance and will be blown out by Denver. It was almost like they were simultaneously having wet dreams about Peyton Manning when the phone rang, telling them the Ravens won, causing both to furiously light up cigarettes and slam open their laptops.

Fox takes a buzz quote by Pollard, where he called Manning a MacBook, and uses the quote about 47 different times to describe Manning's amazing awesome greatness while explaining why the Ravens should not even travel to Denver because of the impossibility of bearing this Manning squad. She then reminds us that Manning may very well be a 5x league MVP and 2x SB MVP in just a few weeks. In fact, it seems more like a sworn confession than a stab in the dark. Read the last paragraph for a real laugh. She may actually believe that Manning is superhuman and must have missed the earlier 15 years of his postseason career.

Banks is slightly less crazy. He existentially ponders the meaning of life for an inevitably losing team who will get slaughtered next week by Peyton Manning. The best quote is this:

Lewis, playing with a brace on his injured right triceps area, wasn't exactly instrumental in the Baltimore defensive effort, but he did get credit for a team-best 13 tackles

Yeah, the scorekeeper just gave him credit for those tackles, but in reality, he was on the sidelines. The whole tone of the article is to dump water on faces of anyone who thinks Manning can be beaten by the Ravens. The Ravens are frauds and their emotional ride is about to come to an end (Baltimore's emotion has a one week expiration date, while Denver's Manning SuperEmotion) will last for eternity.

The article seems angry in its tone, how dare the Ravens celebrate when they are about to play the mighty Peyton Manning? This article is also hilarious for its one-sided fanboy chest thumping for Manning.

Over the last few years, much better teams have flopped in the driver's seat, including the 14-2 Patriots, 13-3 Falcons, and 15-1 Packers. All three of those teams lost to teams they'd already beaten late in the year. The Ravens clearly showed today that they turned the corner and are back to playing their type of football. If I were a betting man, I'd take the Broncos, but I would not be surprises if the Ravens came in and made the MacBook pee his pants for the 11th time in 20 chances. It's amazing how obviously emotional (and apparently scared) these two writers are at the thought of a team spoiling their annual Peyton Manning worship-fest yet again.

How do I say this without sounding sexist? Ah screw it. Ashley Fox only got a job as a writer at ESPN because ESPN needed more female writers. She is yet to produce anything worth reading. It's ironic that her column is titled "Between The Tackles" and she almost never talks about anything happening on the actual field.

Two "professional" writers sound more like insecure teenagers, instantly penning articles that the Ravens have no chance and will be blown out by Denver. It was almost like they were simultaneously having wet dreams about Peyton Manning when the phone rang, telling them the Ravens won, causing both to furiously light up cigarettes and slam open their laptops.

Fox takes a buzz quote by Pollard, where he called Manning a MacBook, and uses the quote about 47 different times to describe Manning's amazing awesome greatness while explaining why the Ravens should not even travel to Denver because of the impossibility of bearing this Manning squad. She then reminds us that Manning may very well be a 5x league MVP and 2x SB MVP in just a few weeks. In fact, it seems more like a sworn confession than a stab in the dark. Read the last paragraph for a real laugh. She may actually believe that Manning is superhuman and must have missed the earlier 15 years of his postseason career.

Banks is slightly less crazy. He existentially ponders the meaning of life for an inevitably losing team who will get slaughtered next week by Peyton Manning. The best quote is this:

Lewis, playing with a brace on his injured right triceps area, wasn't exactly instrumental in the Baltimore defensive effort, but he did get credit for a team-best 13 tackles

Yeah, the scorekeeper just gave him credit for those tackles, but in reality, he was on the sidelines. The whole tone of the article is to dump water on faces of anyone who thinks Manning can be beaten by the Ravens. The Ravens are frauds and their emotional ride is about to come to an end (Baltimore's emotion has a one week expiration date, while Denver's Manning SuperEmotion) will last for eternity.

The article seems angry in its tone, how dare the Ravens celebrate when they are about to play the mighty Peyton Manning? This article is also hilarious for its one-sided fanboy chest thumping for Manning.

Over the last few years, much better teams have flopped in the driver's seat, including the 14-2 Patriots, 13-3 Falcons, and 15-1 Packers. All three of those teams lost to teams they'd already beaten late in the year. The Ravens clearly showed today that they turned the corner and are back to playing their type of football. If I were a betting man, I'd take the Broncos, but I would not be surprises if the Ravens came in and made the MacBook pee his pants for the 11th time in 20 chances. It's amazing how obviously emotional (and apparently scared) these two writers are at the thought of a team spoiling their annual Peyton Manning worship-fest yet again.

Click to expand...

I don't know enough about the writers to comment on what appears to be an example of mediot hot air. But I disagree with your wrap up paragraph. One win against a rookie QB that plays for a team that is arguably just as much in rebuilding mode as playoff caliber confirms what the Ravens are? Not in my book. One performance is far too small a sample to declare the old Ravens are back.....

I don't know enough about the writers to comment on what appears to be an example of mediot hot air. But I disagree with your wrap up paragraph. One win against a rookie QB that plays for a team that is arguably just as much in rebuilding mode as playoff caliber confirms what the Ravens are? Not in my book. One performance is far too small a sample to declare the old Ravens are back.....

Click to expand...

Key to the game will be the Ravens offense. Manning will get his points but the Ravens D will hit 'em and hard. Key will be the running game/no TO's for the Ravens. Ray Rice fumbled twice yesterday. That's not happening again.
Ball control/clock control/no TO's = Ravens win.
John Harbaugh should find the old film on the Patriot/Colt games of 2001 - 2004.
When you don't have a high powered offense the key to beating Manning is to limit his touches. The Ravens can do that with a smart gameplan.
Despite some of the mediot spin, the Denver Broncos are not the second coming of the Greatest Show on Turf. They can and will be beaten. Only question is will it be the Ravens or the Patriots that take care of business.

Much as I hate the Ravens, they're a scrappy bunch you can never count out. I don't think they'll win, but I think they go into Denver and do a great job on Manning, they won't shut him down of course but they will contain him. I believe the key will be Flacco he's going to need a similar performance from yesterday and CANNOT turn the ball over.

That's OK. Let them build up the MVP as much as they want. Just means a harder fall.

I would not be surprised to see Baltimore go in there and give the Broncos some trouble. Unless Flacco plays like an idiot again, it should be a ballgame. Let's not forget, if not for one of the stupidest throws I saw all year, that's a 10-7 game at halftime, with Manning and the Broncos struggling to move the ball much of the first half.

The Ravens did nothing yesterday to make me believe that they can hang within 3 TDs of the Broncos though, dropped room-service INTs, unforced fumbles by Ray Rice, Flacco throwing balls to Vontae Davis twice that he dropped.