Who Is A Better Recruiting Tool for ISIS? Hillary or Trump?

Add one more lie to the long list of Hillary’s best. The candidate that said she was named for Sir Edmund Hillary, got turned down for an astronaut gig with NASA, wanted to join the Marines, was shot at by sniper fire, started the birther movement, consulted the NFL when she bonked her noggin, didn’t have classified emails on her server, and told Americans that a YouTube video caused spontaneous mobs to sack the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, now claims that ISIS is showing Donald Trump videos to people and instantly transforming them into radical jihadists.

That’s right. The “religion of peace” — which by definition must be populated be peaceful people – is made up of people who at the mere mention of Donald Trump become inspired to commit maniacal acts of violence. Almost like The Walking Dead. So says Hillary.

Which begs the question, which candidate is the better recruiting tool for ISIS?

If you’re a radical jihadist and you are hunkered down in whatever bombed out building you’ve been instructed to hunker down in, with Donald John Trump you know what you’re going to get – a one way ticket to the seventy-two virgins you foolishly believe await you in the next world. Sure, seventy-two virgins sounds pretty good in the theoretical sense. But when you’re hunkered down and it’s just you, some guy named Abu, and a couple of guns you don’t know how to operate, a little rethinking of the whole martyrdom thing might be in order.

Besides, there’s a caliphate to resurrect. Wouldn’t Hillary Dianne Rodham Clinton be the better of the two in order for you to do your part in caliphating across the globe?

After all, she’s got Obama’s fecklessness down pat. Weeks go by and no one sees or hears from her. She has a plan – she always says “I have a plan” – but she’s always short on details. Even when she’s participating in a televised debate she doesn’t mind going AWOL, literally waltzing up to her podium as the entire process waits for her return. Fecklessness is good. It means her attention span is short. Wouldn’t want her devoting too much attention to the caliphate. With Hillary as President, she might bomb you on a Tuesday and then spend the rest of the week chasing after climate change and whatever other pink unicorns westerners believe in.

She’s reckless too. She’s chomping at the bit to disarm average, law-abiding Americans. And she’s adetp at using divisive class-warfare rhetoric. Not to mention her affinity for #BlackLivesMatter. How does the old saying go, “united they stand, divided they fall”? Much easier to advance the caliphate upon a divided west than a united one. With Hillary, she isn’t just dividing them up — she’s slicing and dicing her way to the most hyphenated society in human history.

And mean too. She’s in Mean Girls territory when she wants to be, which is usually when she’s dealing with her domestic enemies. Donald Trump simply asked her for an apology, to which she rasped “hell, no!”, even after ALL media outlets called her out as a liar. And poor Bernie Sanders. He’s felt the “bern” big time.

During the lead-up to the Democrat’s debate on December 19, Hillary’s campaign was aghast at the possibility the Sanders campaign had improperly accessed proprietary (Hillary) campaign data when NGP VAN took it’s firewalls down allegedly for maintenance. Yes, it’s ridiculous that a woman who played fast and loose with an email server has the nerve to go there, even if “there” is Bernie Sanders. The DNC’s knee-jerk response was to ban the Sanders campaign entirely from using databased voter information.

What kind of access the Hillary campaign had to proprietary Sanders campaign data both when firewalls were down, and while Sanders campaign access was barred, remains unknown. So do the details of whatever deal Hillary cut with Bernie to convince him not to sue the DNC.

NGP VAN is of course the vendor that nets around $26 million per year running databases that support major league progressive candidates, labor unions, and other left-wing causes. The company was founded by Mark Sullivan and Nathaniel Pearlman.

Pearlman is no stranger to a Hillary campaign. He served as Chief Technology Officer (CTO) for her 2008 White House bid. In that role, he directly supervised Bryan Pagliano. The name Pagliano might not be familiar but the current scandal he’s connected to should be. He was the State Department employee Hillary paid under the table to run her private email server. When called upon to testify before Congress about it, he pled the fifth. Hillary is one client of NGP VAN. So is Emily’s List, the legendary fundraising machine for progressive female candidates, Hillary included. Michelle Stephenson used to work for Emily’s List. She’s now the Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) for NGP VAN.

In other words, she saw an enemy – Bernie Sanders – and she probably called in some favors try and get rid of him. It wouldn’t be a first for someone named “Clinton”. More importantly, name one example from her tenure as Secretary of State in which she used her position to advocate the same sort of thing with terror-leaders abroad. Can’t? Of course not. There aren’t any.

So, which one of the two serves as a better recruiting tool for ISIS – the guy that’s promised to remove the Islamic State from the face of planet earth, or Hillary? Which one gives your caliphate a better shot at success?

Share if you think Hillary might be more of a draw for ISIS than Trump.

About the author, Andrew Allen: Andrew Allen (@aandrewallen) grew up in the American southeast and for more than two decades has worked as an information technoloigies professional in various locations around the globe. A former far-left activist, Allen became a conservative in the late 1990s following a lengthy period spent questioning his own worldview. When not working IT-related issues or traveling, Andrew Allen spends his time discovering new ways to bring the pain by exposing the idiocy of liberals and their ideology. View all articles by Andrew Allen

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.