Bush administration
misled U.S. on wars

You claim that the Bush administration has committed no wrongdoing by invading Iraq and Afghanistan.

Consider this: The most significant reason for invading Iraq in 2003 was because Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, and supposedly posed a direct threat to the United States.

While the United Nations suggested giving inspectors more time in Iraq, the Bush administration instead jumped the gun and, after giving horribly erroneous intelligence to Congress, went to war.

I'm not sure how well-versed you are in military tactics, but one would expect that Hussein, possessing a large stockpile of supposedly devastating weapons, would have used them as soon as the war had started. No such biological or nuclear attacks came.

Eventually, it was discovered that there was no credible evidence that weapons of mass destruction ever existed in Iraq at all. The biggest reason for the war in Iraq was debunked.

While it may not be exactly correct to say that Bush himself lied to go to war, I don't see any doubt that the president and his administration certainly misled Congress and the American people into going into a second war.

You also claim that the U.S. military has defeated the Taliban, which is utterly false. According to very recent military and Pentagon reports, the Taliban are stronger than they have been since the wars began, and may even possess the power to strike inside the U.S. with deadly force.

The Taliban, as well as the Iraqi insurgency, are hardly destroyed. While you may blame the "liberal media" for any failures in the morale of our troops, consider that it could be ineffective commanders, lies from the government and unreasonable demands from the military that are dragging U.S. morale down.