This is what the inside of my head sounds like

You have to choose; is it hokum, or is it glamour? Fritz Leiber wrote a short story about it that poked at the dark forces lurking in those Southland canyons, murky in the canals of Venice. And Leiber was there, intimate with that early mix of California Black: cults (Crowley, Parsons, LaVey, Hubbard), fantasy, horror and science fiction. I choose glamour, the old sense of it, a deceitful, glittering lure. Was KENNETH ANGER (born 1927) the Changeling Prince in A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1935)? Apocryphal, doubtful and glittering true. Watching Anger’s films you tick off his influence: “Oh, that’s where Scorsese stole that. That’s that thing that Guy Maddin does. Kustom Kar Kommandos is David Lynch in three minutes.” What Anger took from Maya Deren was film as the dream of self. What he took from Crowley was film as a magickal art, in fact, a curse. In this wise, he is kin to Grant Morrison and Alan Moore, other practitioners who mold popular forms into ritual. More Babalon Workings. And what do you see in Scorpio Rising, Fireworks, Rabbit Moon, Inauguration of the Pleasure Dome, Lucifer Rising and Puce Moment? Beauty — rapturous sexy sexy, glorious abandon at war with ethics. You cannot in the presence of his films deny their beauty, but how to reconcile these unfortunate truths? How did he get that fucking shot in front of the Sphinx? That volcano, those fireworks, those dresses — all so alluring. Can it be that truth pales before beauty? Is it hokum, or is it glamour?