As you’ve probably anticipated, in the actual experiment, the group leaders proved to be no more competent than anyone else. They became leaders by force of personality rather than strength of ability. Before starting the group task, the participants completed a short questionnaire designed to measure how “dominant” they tended to be. Those people with the most dominant personalities tended to become the leaders. How did the dominant individuals become the group leaders even though they were no better at math? Did they bully the others into obeying, shouting down meek but intelligent group members? Did they campaign for the role, persuading others that they were the best at math, or at least the best at organizing their group? Not at all. The answer is almost absurdly simple: They spoke first. For 94 percent of the problems, the group’s final answer was the first answer anyone suggested, and people with dominant personalities just tend to speak first and most forcefully.

Recent research in the area of embodied cognition confirms you can improve how you think and behave by changing how you sit, stand and move.

Harvard professor Amy Cuddy explains her research on the subject in this TED talk:

To a degree, we may all be method actors — like it or not.

In fact, not faking it can be a problem. Not acting confident and friendly in social situations can create a downward spiral where you make others think you don’t like them. Can you operate in society without faking?

But do you want to be a faker?

There is a danger when faking. You can be caught. And if you’re not, successful faking can be a double-edged sword. Do you really wish to be who you are pretending to be?