Even the most moe-addled gamers have been forced to admit that newly released trailers of impending blockbuster Grand Theft Auto V show some of the most impressive graphics of any video game to date, even if it does seem they will be restricted to laughably low resolutions on the PS3 and Xbox 360.

Really? CryEngine 2 tech demo from 5 years ago looked better to me, as it did Unreal Engine 3 tech demo from a couple years back… to me it just looks like another game who overcompensates low-poly with high-def textures…

Graphics aren’t everything, though the game looks impressive and very detailed.
Can’t wait to get my hands on the game, ride some cars/bikes like I stole them, crush/kill some pedestrians, do some crazy stunts, being an asshole and enjoying it, etc etc…

I’m a PC gamer, I have quite a rig and I play all games on maxed out settings…but god “PC gamers” piss me off. By which I mean the idiots here immediately dismissing this incredible looking stuff just because it’s on a console. You need look no further as to why developers and publishers interact with you assholes as little as possible. What’s worse is you make the rest of us look like dicks by association.

Show your love on the posts you like and keep your hate to yourselves. This is not about technical graphics and effects. Crysis is nowere near this graphics wise. You just complain and moan about everything….even godlike anime like SOA or great western graphics artstyle like GTA fall under this community HATE. Worst community ever, i must learn to read sankaku posts and refrain from reading the coments…its almost 2 years reading your crap.

The PS3, and 360 are already graphically appealing as need to be. And they employ multilayer/social-networking aspects on the FPS genre, which a lot of American/Gringoos(Americanophiles)enjoy.

What they really need are innovative games on the platform. Story and/or character intensive games with innovative features/side-quests to reward your gaming efforts(and no, I’m not talking about “tropheys or any of that sort). Very few American/Japanese/European games have this.

The only fun thing about GTA is crashing into random things and killing civilians enough to have a huge army going after you and lasting as long as possible. Everything else is so overrated and gets boring quickly with the ever so corny storyline… Besides, everyone I know who absolutely loves the game are all wanna be gangsters. Lol.

It is all shit.
The textures are going to be shit.
The console rez is going to be shit.
The models are going to be shit.
The draw distance and res will be laughable.
The AA and filtering is going to be shit.
The framerate is going to be shit.

Everything in that clip is done with uncompressed prerenderings on a PC.

Lol who the fuck would want to play skyrim at 720 on high with 4x AA. Oh people who didn’t buy a PC in the last 5 years. I’ll stick with 1080p and everything on high/ultra in my games MSAA/HDAA w/e available, etc.

I get the feeling that a big group of people just read the title and felt the need to post a comment based solely on that. While of course consoles do not match high-end PCs(and don’t say even cheap ones can get it done, because you’ll be spending over 700$), GTAV may be the best to date.

Now granted of course Crysis was a massive and beautifuly done game, I consider it a PC game first, but even there my 4-yo 700$ pc can only handle medium graphic settings, but at 1080res. Considering that Rockstar does a proper installment on PC, many will be seeing superior graphics on PC compared to consoles.

To end this, I will quote, “show some of the most impressive graphics of any video game to date.” This does not claim it the best, the title of this article was meant to catch the reader’s eye, which I believe it did quite smashingly.

Only in Sankaku an ignorant fanboy like you can achieve a positive reaction with a comment like this one,even Sony executives have stopped to tell this retarded crap that storage space makes graphic!!!For your information uncompressed texture are too heavy to be read from the slow speed of the PS3 Blu-Ray(even slower than 360’s DVD drive)that’s the reason because games need to be installed,so more space is totally useless unless you want to put in thousands of FMVs or a game plus film like it happened for Macross Frontier

1 you’re retarted fanboy
2 you’re not reading my posts
It’s impossible for PS3 to elaborate high definition texture in real time reading directly from disc simply because blu-ray is too slow(like your brain),so the only solution is to install everything on HD and also manage everithing from disc require a lot more memory and processing power!!!Please next time learn before instead of voting down what you can’t understand!!!

Troll are you indecent and ignorant!If you are more informed you should already know that PS3 BD drive read at maximum 72 Mbps per sec so the equivalent of 9 MB per sec(cause Megabit are 1/8 of Megabyte)…So shut up your mouth stupid Sony fanboy ang go out to learn something!!!

Also what can you expect from a console like x360 which has more than 7 years, 512 mb RAM, GPU ATI xenos with 10mb!

The only thing holding this junk is the fact that three core!
The PC version will be better if not in DX9 port. But while this generation of consoles is not scrapped, fans of better graphics will keep complaining until his death.

Probably this GTA will be a mix of the most popular options for older versions to please a bigger slice of players.
That or the franchise will end up dying ..

Maybe because they’re risc and dedicated chips,that’s,for your information,8X faster to the PC counterparts,an example:imagine to run Uncharted 3 or Halo 4 on a computer with the same specifics,you will play maximum at 3-4 frame ps!!!

Funny when people use the “controller” argument against PC gaming…because I use an XBOX controller connected to my laptop gaming rig (full compatable with Windows of course). My laptop is connected to my HDTV via HDMI cable. It is the exact same setup as my PS3, except my laptop is smaller in profile than my gaming console, but much more powerful.

@ Anon 1:08
Some games are just better when you use a controller. 2D side scrollers, mostly. Controllers are often better for fast-paced control schemes like Mario or fighting games, while keyboards are better for more detailed control schemes like MMOs, and especially RTS.

I bought a controller for my computer, but I only use it for old ports.

“Grand Theft Auto V show some of the most impressive graphics of any video game to date” – Artefact, Sankaku Nov 15, 2012.
I’m sorry, but in which does he state it’s only the GTA franchise?
But of course, he’s an idiot it’s probably only his own opinion.

No infact Uncharted 2,Halo 4,Gears Of War 3,and Battlefield 3 are faaaaaaaaaar better!!!And my dear PC fanboy,Crysis has been ported on consoles too and,surprise surprise,has a better lightining and a lot better framerate compared to the best computer counterparts!!!

Did you actually ever look at a PC/console comparison of the Crysis port? They’ve massively scaled down the graphics in practically every way. The console port may feature some “altered” lighting effects, but they are hardly “better”, and in most cases the changes look considerably less realistic, with blown highlights and oversaturated colors attempting to oscure the lack of detail. The foliage is far more sparse and less detailed, and tons of objects are missing from the the environment or simplified. Crysis on the PC looks nearly photorealistic, while Crysis on consoles looks like its running on the old Far Cry engine. They look like totally different generations of games.

I suspect you haven’t actually seen any comparisons between the two, so here’s a video comparison between the 360 and PC. It’s probably best to view the video at 1080p, but even at low resolution the differences should be like night and day…

It’s certainly better than San Andreas, but I was just playing Halo4 an hour ago, and hell, you can’t compare them. Halo4’s graphics are just in a completely different league.
To be honest, I didn’t expect Halo4 to be this good. Bungie was never top notch with graphics, but 343 Industries made Halo4 absolute eye candy.

u cant really compare GTA gfx with Halo gfx. It’s like ur comparing an apple with a tomato. GTA has to load more Object and view distance is higher, more AI elements has to be loaded and and and… this all puts more stress to ur machine cos all of this the gfx has to surfer.

1st person shooter games can focus on eyecandy gfx cos the gfx load isn’t so high as in GTA