President Barack Obama scuttled an Asian trip in favor of last-minute lobbying at the White House on his signature issue, playing host to a procession of wavering Democrats.

“It will make history and we will make progress by passing this legislation,” predicted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Republicans disagreed.

“We are in the midst of a real battle to make sure we put into place our common sense alternative to this health care plan,” said Rep. David Dreier, R-San Dimas. “Right now the idea that they (Democrats) are trying to avoid accountability, as they are, is just beyond the pale.”

Democrats unveiled final alterations to a bill – 16 tumultuous months in the making – meant to expand health care to 32 million uninsured, bar the insurance industry from denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions, and trim federal deficits by an estimated $138 billion over the next decade.

The bill would affect early every American and remake one-sixth of the national economy.

Beginning in 2014, most Americans would be required for the first time to purchase insurance, and face penalties if they refused. Millions of families with incomes up to $88,000 a year would receive government help to defray their costs. Large businesses would face fines if they did not offer good-quality coverage to their workers.

As Democrats trumpeted their bill, particularly its potential impact on the deficit, Republicans attacked it relentlessly as a government takeover of the health care industry financed by ever higher Medicare cuts and tax increases.

Said Dreier: “The people whom I represent are calling in and overwelming telling me, just as they have in the town meetings I’ve had… that we have to make sure we start over and recognize that there is a problem that needs to be addressed, because we are tackling it… but the idea of having a trillion dollar government takeover ain’t the answer.”

“The American people are saying, `Stop’ and they’re screaming at the top of their lungs,” said House GOP Leader John Boehner of Ohio. Citing reports that Obama had told members of the Hispanic caucus that his presidency depends on the bill’s passage, he added, “I’m sorry, Mr. President, this isn’t about you.”

Democrats set a Sunday showdown in the House, and while Pelosi and others expressed confidence about the outcome, Obama’s decision to put off a scheduled Asian trip until later in the year was a confession that the votes were not yet secured.

In Washington’s time-honored tradition, the conversations with the president ranged widely. Rep. Luis Gutierrez of Illinois said he agreed to vote for the health care overhaul on the understanding that Obama and congressional Democrats would begin attempts quickly to pass comprehensive immigration legislation. Within hours, Senate Democrats unveiled a bill, and the president praised it in a written statement.

Obama and Democratic leaders focused their lobbying on two overlapping groups of Democrats, 37 who voted against an earlier bill in the House and 40 who voted for it only after first making sure it would include strict abortion limits that now have been modified.

After weeks of secrecy-shrouded meetings, Democrats unveiled 153 pages of last-minute changes that fell generally into three categories.

To address concerns of House Democrats, subsidies were raised for consumers who would face a first-ever requirement to purchase coverage. To ease concerns among governors, more money was added for a dozen states that already provide the level of Medicaid coverage that is required under the bill.

Seniors who experience a gap in coverage in the Medicare prescription drug program would receive a $250 rebate this year – an election-year bragging point for Democrats as they look toward the fall campaign with control of Congress at stake.

Beginning in 2011, pharmaceutical industry discounts would cover 50 percent of the costs of drugs that seniors buy once they enter the gap in coverage. That share would rise to 75 percent over a decade. That would bring it into line with the program’s basic benefit, in which Medicare recipients generally pay 25 percent of their costs and the program picks up the rest.

To help pay the cost of increased benefits, the legislation now calls for a 3.8 percent Medicare payroll tax on dividends and interest once an individual’s overall income reaches $200,000, or a couple’s reaches $250,000.

The measure also erased a Senate-passed provision to give Nebraska a greater share of Medicaid funds than other states would receive under an expansion mandated under the bill.

In a gesture to public sentiment as well as the sensitivities of moderate members of the rank and file, Democrats and Obama sought to focus public attention on the deficit reduction they said would result from the revised legislation. The Congressional Budget office put the 10-year savings at $138 billion, but Democratic leaders said that would be dwarfed by a projected $1.2 trillion in the following decade.

But Republicans countered quickly, pointing out that the revisions raised the levels of planned Medicare cuts and would mean higher taxes, as well.

“The Senate bill that Speaker Pelosi said Democrats are so afraid to take a vote on cut Medicare by $465 billion. This latest bill increases those cuts by about $60 billion more,” said the Senate Republican leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

“How about taxes? The Senate bill that Democrats are so afraid to take a vote on raises taxes by $494 billion. This bill increases those tax hikes by at least $150 billion.”

The package of changes released during the day involves the second of two bills that Obama hopes lawmakers will send him in coming days.

Sparking outrage by Republicans, Pelosi and other House Democratic leaders are likely to try to pass both bills with a single vote in hopes of avoiding a stand-alone roll call on the unpopular Senate measure.

Passage in the House would send the first bill to the president for his signature, and the other measure to the Senate for a final vote expected by the end of next week. Over GOP objections, it will take place under rules that bar a filibuster, meaning Democrats will not be required to post a 60-vote majority.

Join the Conversation

We invite you to use our commenting platform to engage in insightful conversations about issues in our community. Although we do not pre-screen comments, we reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We might permanently block any user who abuses these conditions.

If you see comments that you find offensive, please use the “Flag as Inappropriate” feature by hovering over the right side of the post, and pulling down on the arrow that appears. Or, contact our editors by emailing moderator@scng.com.