wether its 2012 ,government cover ups,Anonymous,reptile people ,illuminati,monsters yellowstone national park,yellowstone hotel the doomsday clock ,adolph hitler + a lot more (never let the truth get in the way of a good conspiracy)Please Donate and Help me Maintain this Blog to Enable me to Dig Out More and better Theories
................(Also Incorporating Spirit2009)

'Near-miss' for us all? Giant asteroid is set to pass within 28,000 miles of Earth TODAY

An asteroid the size of a double-decker bus is set to skim past Earth today - but the good news, according to Nasa, is that it has no chance of colliding with the planet.The space rock, labelled 2010 TD54, will reach its nearest point to Earth - approximately 28,000 miles away - around midday, although it is unclear what its exact course will be.However scientists have said that despite its close proximity to the planet it will not enter the Earth's atmosphere and, if it did, it would be most likely to burn up before reaching the ground.

First sighting: The Kitt Peak National Observatory Solar Telescope in Arizona spotted an asteroid the size of a double-decker bus which will skim past Earth today

'Small space rocks this size would burn up in our atmosphere and pose no ground danger,' Nasa's Asteroid Watch said on Twitter.

'Fortunately it seems this one will miss us,' Emily Baldwin of Astronomy Now told The Times. 'But it is a reminder that the Earth is still in the middle of a cosmic shooting gallery and we need to keep constant watch for incoming asteroids.'The rock was detected on Sunday by the Nasa-backed Arizona Kitt Peak National Observatory Solar Telescope. The space agency added that a 'moderate telescope' would be needed to view the asteroid which at times would be closer to Earth than some satellites, and 'significantly near' the Moon.

Near miss: The asteroid will be 28,000 miles away from Earth when it flies past - in space terms, that's very close indeed

The TD54 is the latest in a string of asteroids that have been discovered to be passing close to Earth recently.In late September astronomers spotted a 'potentially hazardous' space rock - the 2010 ST3 - which will pass within four million miles of the planet in mid-October.The object, which was reported to be 150 metres in diameter, was the first Potentially Hazardous Object (PHO) to be discovered by the Pan-STARRS survey, which uses a new telescope to look for dangerous asteroids.And two smaller rocks, which were discovered by by the Nasa-funded Catalina Sky Survey in Arizona, flew harmlessly past Earth just over a month ago.

Congested: This image taken in 2010 shows just how many asteroids there are within our solar system

Asteroid 2010 RX30, which was estimated at between 32 and 55 feet long, passed within 154,000 miles of the planet, followed on the same day by the 2010 RF12, which was 20-49 feet long and just 49,000 miles away.Although none of these objects hit Earth, scientists have suggested that a ten-metre long asteroid passes as close to the Earth as the Moon on a daily basis.It is thought one of these might strike Earth's atmosphere every ten years on average. Smaller asteroids enter the atmosphere around once a year but usually explode before impact.

Chicken McHalal: McDonald's denied using halal meat... now it admits meat IS in one of its most popular meals

Fast-food giant McDonald's has admitted selling halal chicken without telling its customers. The poultry was used in popular menu items such as Chicken McNuggets and the McChicken Sandwich in its 1,200 British outlets.
The admission comes three weeks after the company categorically denied to this newspaper that it used any halal meat. Now McDonald's has revealed that the firm that supplies its poultry, Cargill, produces halal chicken at one of its abattoirs.
In a statement to The Mail on Sunday, McDonald's said: 'As a result of your enquiries, our investigation has confirmed that some halal chicken has entered our supply chain without our knowledge, and we apologise to our customers for this.

Food chain: Halal poultry has been used in popular menu items such as Chicken McNuggets and the McChicken Sandwich in its 1,200 British outlets

'While is it not a quality issue, halal chicken is outside of our specification. We have received assurances from Cargill that halal meat production from this abattoir has now stopped.'
McDonald's says all the chicken in its restaurants comes from poultry which has been stunned before slaughter. Meanwhile, Asda, Britain's second-largest supermarket chain, has admitted that much of its lamb and chicken is slaughtered according to Islamic ritual.
A company source said: 'It's fair to say that most lamb is halal and I would say half of the chicken is halal.' Islamic law requires Muslims to slaughter animals by slitting their throat while reciting an Arabic prayer which translates as: 'In the name of Allah, who is the greatest.'

Mail on Sunday series of stories about halal meat in British stores

The animal is required to be conscious but moderate Muslim groups allow it to be stunned before the throat is slit. Both McDonald's and Asda made their admissions after our investigation traced the abattoirs where they source their meat.

A puzzling discovery has raised a question mark over the Sun's impact on climate change and could provide ammunition for sceptics, it was revealed today.
Until now it has been assumed that less activity from the Sun equates to less warming of the Earth.
But the new research, which focuses on a three-year snapshot of time between 2004 and 2007, suggests the opposite may be true.
As solar activity waned at the end of one of the Sun's 11-year cycles, the new data show the amount of energy reaching the Earth at visible wavelengths rose rather than fell.

Several giant sunspots crossing the face of the Sun. The amount of solar activity may have negligible effects on the Earth's climate

Scientists believe it may also be possible that during the next up-turn of the cycle, when sun activity increases, there might be a cooling effect at the Earth's surface.
A further twist arises from the fact that over the past century, overall solar activity has been increasing.
If the new findings apply to long as well as short time periods, this could translate into a small degree of cooling rather than the slight warming effect shown in existing climate models. It would effectively turn received wisdom on its head.
Sceptics are likely to say the results further undermine the reliability of climate change science, especially with regard to solar effects.
Professor Joanna Haigh, from Imperial College London, who led the study, said: 'These results are challenging what we thought we knew about the Sun's effect on our climate.
However, they only show us a snapshot of the Sun's activity and its behaviour over the three years of our study could be an anomaly.
'We cannot jump to any conclusions based on what we have found during this comparatively short period and we need to carry out further studies to explore the sun's activity and the patterns that we have uncovered on longer timescales.

The rising sun lights up the sky as low-lying clouds sit along the horizonin Wyoming. Researchers have warned against jumping to any conclusions based on what the have found during this 'comparatively short period'

'However, if further studies find the same pattern over a longer period of time, this could suggest that we may have overestimated the sun's role in warming the planet, rather than underestimating it.'
Speaking at a news briefing in London, she denied that it would fuel scepticism about climate change research.
'I think it doesn't give comfort to the climate sceptics at all,' she said.
'It may suggest that we don't know that much about the Sun. It casts no aspersions at all upon the climate models.'
The research, published in the journal Nature, is based on data from a satellite called SORCE (Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment) that has been measuring the Sun's energy output at X-ray, ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared wavelengths.
Prof Haigh's team found that, above an altitude of 28 miles, concentrations of ozone in the atmosphere increased as total solar output decreased.

How global temperatures have risen steadily since records began in 1880

How Surface and satellite temperatures have varied over the past 35 years

The ozone rise accompanied a steep fall in levels of ultraviolet radiation.
Closer to the ground, an increase in visible radiation caused heating of the lower atmosphere.
'At face value, the data seem incredibly important,' Michael Lockwood, a space physicist at the University of Reading, told Nature.com.
'If solar activity is out of phase with solar radiative forcing, it could change our understanding of how processes in the troposphere and stratosphere act to modulate Earth's climate.'
'The findings could prove very significant when it comes to understanding, and quantifying, natural climate fluctuations,' he added.
'But no matter how you look at it, the Sun's influence on current climate change is at best a small natural add-on to man-made greenhouse warming.'
'All the evidence is that the vast majority of warming is anthropogenic. It might be that the solar part isn't quite working the way we thought it would, but it is certainly not a seismic rupture of the science.'

Love Actually director Richard Curtis gave his permission for the film to be withdrawn

Love Actually director Richard Curtis has withdrawn a climate change viral video that shows schoolchildren being blown up.
The gruesome four-minute video also shows X-Files actress Gillian Anderson and ex-footballer David Ginola being blown apart for not caring about climate change.
It appeared on climate change group 10:10's website after sparking controversy. and ends with the caption: 'Cut your Carbon by 10%. No pressure.'
Curtis, who also wrote Blackadder, Notting Hill and Four Weddings and a Funeral, directed the video for the campaign as it nears its first anniversary.
Tottenham footballers Peter Crouch and Ledley King also make an appearance, though he is not blown up.
A spokesman for the campaign organisers said: 'We have discussed our decision with Richard and he is happy for the film to be withdrawn.
'We wanted to find a way to bring this critical issue back into the headlines while making people laugh.
'Many people found the resulting film extremely funny, but unfortunately some didn't and we sincerely apologise to anybody we have offended. As a result we've taken if off our website.'

Scroll down for video (warning, graphic content)

A scene from the shocking video posted on the climate change campaign group 10:10's website

Children react after two youngsters are 'blown up' by their teacher for failing to show any interest in reducing global warming

Former Tottenham Hotspur star David Ginola chats to Peter Crouch, Ledley King, Wilson Palacios and Giovani Dos Santos, seconds before he is blown up

The 10:10 campaign is designed to encourage people, business and government to cut their carbon emissions by 10 per cent.
It is an independent organisation founded by film director Franny Armstrong and backed by a range of organisations including Comic Relief.
The 10:10 campaign was launched in the UK in September 2009 and has already spread to 41 countries. In Britain, 91,000 people, 3,500 businesses and 4,000 councils, school and other organisations have signed up so far.
The coalition government has also committed to cut the government’s carbon emissions by 10% in a year, to help combat global warming. On October 10 - 10.10.10 - the campaign will hold a Global Day of Doing, involving 180 nations.

The true face of the green movement. Total intolerance to any opposing point of view, however reasonable. Suggesting that people, especially innocent children, be brutally, sadistically killed if they disagree, is a view that must never ever be tolerated -- it's not something to ever joke about. History has taught us that the hard way.

Eco-fascism must never be tolerated.

On the plus side, this is a massive own-goal by the eco-movement. This is a stark warning to us all. We nwo know what they are really thinking.

It's also interesting to note how much money that ad must have cost -- it must be at least a million. Where did the money come from? These NGOs, pressure groups and charities need much more investigation.

The eco-facists -- and BBC tax-payer funded eco-facist Richard Curtis -- jumped the shark big-time with this nasty little piece. Unfortunately for them, the public have tumbled their crooked game, so they are resorting to shock tactics.

Wow. I mean really, wow! I have seen some unmitigated tripe in my time, but this takes the biscuit and is truly frightening, as our favourite socialist crusader Mr Curtis is behind it.

If I had not known better, I would have thought this film was made by the camp who dares to have some question marks and doubts regarding the claims made by the man-made climate warming camp. It really is how the latter group behaves, they and they alone know the truth, anyone who disagrees or simply has some questions or doubts must be annihalated. Is this not a rather astonishing own goal?

When many people have lost their lives to terrorism in the last decade, by groups who feel non-submission must be punished with cold-blooded and cowardly death, this really is pathetic and just downright nasty. Who in their right mind could possibly have thought this was either funny or a good idea?

I won't be patronised or threaten by this ECO NAZIS.
Franny Armstrong and her Eco cronies are no better than the Taliban beheading Infidels.

Of course Mr Curtis only have Holydays in Britain, and he doesn't promote his films abroad, all his food is source locally, he doesn't drive, and if he needs to travel to New York he swims across the atlantic ...Hypocritical patronising champaigne socialist git!!!

Death of the office joke: Coalition enacts Harriet's PC equality law which means ANYONE can sue for ANYTHING that offends them

New equality laws masterminded by Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman have come into force today, threatening to create a political correctness minefield for recession-hit businesses.
Under the Act, vegans, teetotallers and atheists are to be given the same protection against discrimination as religious groups while gipsies and travellers will get special favours because of the 'many socio-economic disadvantages' they face.
There is also a provision which extends protection from third party harassment, meaning employers have a responsibility to shield their staff, where possible, from abuse by customers.
This has led to fears that bosses could be sued for jokes or comments that staff overhear and find offensive - even if it is not directed at or about them.
The Act, which ministers claim will help stamp out pay discrimination, have been slammed by employer groups who claim it will cost £189million to implement.

Equal measures: Home Secretary Theresa May has pushed ahead with 90 per cent of the Equality Act championed by Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman

The Coalition has pressed ahead with 90 per cent Ms Harman's Equality Act, including a measure to stop pay secrecy clauses being used to hide unfair differences between what men and women are paid.
From today the law - which was first passed by Parliament in April - will be changed so that men and women in all firms are allowed to discuss and compare their salaries.
But employer groups warned the new laws will cause a red tape nightmare at a time when businesses are already struggling with the recession.
In other measures, new powers for employment tribunals will mean those found guilty of discrimination can face sweeping orders to change their policies, rather than just being hit for compensation in individual cases.

More...

And firms will be banned from asking job applicants about their health, while new protections for disabled people will make it easier for staff who have taken a large number of sick days or who look after elderly relatives to win unfair dismissal cases.
The Act will also make is easier for staff to claim they were discriminated against because of disability because they no longer have to prove they were treated less favourably than a non-disabled colleague.
David Frost, the director-general of the British Chambers of Commerce said: At a time when the Government is trying to create jobs in the private sector, this legislation will put people off for fear of getting it wrong'.
Home Secretary Theresa May, who is also minister for women and equality, said: 'In these challenging economic times it's more important than ever for employers to make the most of all the talent available.

SOME OF THE EQUALITY ACT PROVISIONS...

Vegans, teetotallers and atheists given the same protection against discrimination as religious groups

Churches forced to hire homosexuals and transsexuals against the tenets of their faith when employing staff under planned Labour equality laws

Gipsies and travellers to get special favours because of the 'many socio-economic disadvantages' they face

Fire chiefs forced to prioritise the poor when drawing up fire fighting plans as poorer areas need better cover because they tend to suffer from a greater number of fires owing to the worse state of their homes and a lack of smoke alarms

Fears that bosses could be sued for jokes or comments that staff overhear and find offensive under 'third party harassment' provisions

What's still being discussed....

Plans to force local authorities to discriminate in favour of the poor in order to narrow income inequalities

'When a company reflects the society it serves, it's better for the employer, the employees and the customers, so being a woman should never be a barrier to being treated fairly at work.
'From today the gagging clauses that stop people discussing their pay with their colleagues will be unenforceable, allowing women and men to find out if they're being paid unfairly.'
One employment lawyer warned that many large firms would find the ban on pay secrecy clauses 'unpalatable'.
Alex Mizzi, a solicitor at Dawsons LLP, said: 'Setting aside the fact that companies will view this as yet more red tape, bonuses and salaries are hugely sensitive for the vast majority of businesses.
'We know full well that a bonus can differentiate wildly from person to person, irrespective of seniority, and employers will have to be mindful of that when the Christmas bonus season gets into full swing.'
Tory and Lib Dem ministers are still arguing about whether to implement Miss Harman’s notorious plans to force local authorities to discriminate in favour of the poor in order to narrow income inequalities.
The plans were hailed as ‘socialism in a single clause’ when Miss Harman unveiled them last year.
But a Whitehall source said: ‘The Tories felt they went too far and the Lib Dems believed they didn’t go far enough. Discussions are continuing on whether to implement the clause.’
Also still up for discussion are Labour plans to allow firms to explicitly discriminate in favour of women and ethnic minority candidates - the kind of ‘affirmative action’ which has proved a political hot potato in the United States.
A Home Office source said the Act brings together nine different laws into a single piece of legislation, 'simplifying the law and reducing the administrative burden on businesses'.
The Government will announce 'in due course' its plans for the remaining parts of the Act, he said.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission welcomed the Act. Its interim chief executive, Helen Hughes, said: 'It's more than just an Act.
'Simplifying equality legislation and extending protection to a wide range of groups that face discrimination will help Britain become a fairer society, improve public services, and help business perform well.'
Banning the use of pre-employment questionnaires under the new Equality Act could make it easier for veterans who have been recently disabled in the line of duty to get work, she said.
And protecting young mothers from discrimination in school or college could mean they finish their education rather than drop out'
Ms Hughes added: 'It is also a reminder that treating people fairly protects organisations from costly discrimination claims.'

I think they should bring in a law only one person in a household can stand for parliament There are so few seats available so why do we allow a husband & wife to be in Parliament having so much say
I see the Kinnocks have made sure that their daughter is with them on the gravy train as she is now working for Ed Milliband
It would be interesting to know how much this family cost the tax payers with EU pensions, Lords fees and expenses old age pensions and many perks
Is this what socialism is about keep it in the family