I must be a complete novice here Frank, that looked like a legitimate tackle to me. I don`t think he led with his head. Just my opinion of course

The low tackles are something else

Click to expand...

That's what I said!
The ACL-hits are the only ones I hate..... those are dangerous, puzzy tackling and I'd like Goldson's head cracked the next time he does that.
Hits to the chest area are fine with me even though the league flags them.

That's what I said!
The ACL-hits are the only ones I hate..... those are dangerous, puzzy tackling and I'd like Goldson's head cracked the next time he does that.
Hits to the chest area are fine with me even though the league flags them.

That's what I said!
The ACL-hits are the only ones I hate..... those are dangerous, puzzy tackling and I'd like Goldson's head cracked the next time he does that.
Hits to the chest area are fine with me even though the league flags them.

Is there a thread or link to explain the Rating system. Sorry don't mean to offend. Removed the rating.

Click to expand...

Check out your member profile. On the left hand side if you scroll down a little there is a brake down of the ratings you have both given and received. The type of "feedback" the rating gives is color coded. basically everything is positive except that "disagree" and "optimistic" is neutral, and "old" is the only negative. I got no problem with negative feedback as long as it is warranted. And yeah I saw that you changed it. You didn't have to, but thanks none the less.

Not sure about other fans, but on this forum we double check our facts when trolls try to make up stuff

Click to expand...

Right. Which is exactly what I did, providing the evidence of the numbers. You probably ought to make sure that posters on "this" forum, like LargeRon, do not provide bogus numbers like he did in his response to mine. A good source for you to see that my data was correct is profootballreference.com. If you go there, instead of assuming that I was "making up stuff," you would see that my claim was correct. If you were even more diligent, and went to nfl.com/replay (after paying a small fee, of course), and watched the four games the 49ers lost, you would find quite convincing evidence that in each of the 49er loses with the exception of the Rams, their opponent played a BALANCED and PHYSICAL offensive game.

With the Vikings, they ran the ball enough to keep the defense honest, but it was Ponder's play that gave the Viking offense balance (they are usually a run heavy team, but in this game they played more of a traditional balanced west coast offense, with a physical running attack to keep the defense honest).

With the Giants game, CONTRARY to LargeRon's claim, they were able to run the ball very well against the 49ers (while normally they are a pass first offense). Instead of passing the ball all over the field like they normally did, Bradshaw broke more than 100 on us, and Eli didn't even break 200 yards passing on us.

The Rams game was a physical, defensive match. This one shouldn't have been a loss, if not for a freak turnover, but the 49ers defense shut them down.

The final loss, against Seattle, Russel Wilson was held to less than 180 passing yards, but Lynch got 111 (very hard to do against our defense). The Seahawks ran AND passed the ball. They used a power running game mixed with a quick, short passing attack. The offensive attack was BALANCED.

In the three losses which a great deal of the blame fell on the defense, the opposing offense was BALANCED.

Now contrast that with some of the teams that were one dimensional against us:

Well, LargeRon here was factually incorrect about his response to me (and so was. The games the 49ers lost were against physical, balanced offenses.

Right. Which is exactly what I did, providing the evidence of the numbers. You probably ought to make sure that posters on "this" forum, like LargeRon, do not provide bogus numbers like he did in his response to mine. A good source for you to see that my data was correct is profootballreference.com. If you go there, instead of assuming that I was "making up stuff," you would see that my claim was correct. If you were even more diligent, and went to nfl.com/replay (after paying a small fee, of course), and watched the four games the 49ers lost, you would find quite convincing evidence that in each of the 49er loses with the exception of the Rams, their opponent played a BALANCED and PHYSICAL offensive game.

With the Vikings, they ran the ball enough to keep the defense honest, but it was Ponder's play that gave the Viking offense balance (they are usually a run heavy team, but in this game they played more of a traditional balanced west coast offense, with a physical running attack to keep the defense honest).

With the Giants game, CONTRARY to LargeRon's claim, they were able to run the ball very well against the 49ers (while normally they are a pass first offense). Instead of passing the ball all over the field like they normally did, Bradshaw broke more than 100 on us, and Eli didn't even break 200 yards passing on us.

The Rams game was a physical, defensive match. This one shouldn't have been a loss, if not for a freak turnover, but the 49ers defense shut them down.

The final loss, against Seattle, Russel Wilson was held to less than 180 passing yards, but Lynch got 111 (very hard to do against our defense). The Seahawks ran AND passed the ball. They used a power running game mixed with a quick, short passing attack. The offensive attack was BALANCED.

In the three losses which a great deal of the blame fell on the defense, the opposing offense was BALANCED.

Now contrast that with some of the teams that were one dimensional against us:

Anyone watched the week one game recently?
PM me if you want to.
A lot of changes since then.
I think both teams are better, but I wish we still had Nick Perry and Bryan Bulaga.
And Desmond Bishop (who was already done for the year 4 weeks before that week 1 game %^*#*@#)

A lot of changes since then.
I think both teams are better, but I wish we still had Nick Perry and Bryan Bulaga.
And Desmond Bishop (who was already done for the year 4 weeks before that week 1 game %^*#*@#)Also Nick Collins, who had his career abruptly shortened.

I have been a 9er fan my hole life with greenbay as my second this will be 1 hell of a game if we can get to rodgers we have a chance it depends on witch defenses shows up u guys have the best qb in the leauge so we better bring are A game well we have a young qb who can nake mistakes I say gb 28 ..31 sf it will be a hard game the best team will win