-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| | Andy Green wrote:
| |> Werner sorry I am confused now. Elsewhere you are recommending against
| |> using rfkill for WLAN?
| |
| | No, I'm not recommending against using rfkill. If you want to
| | suppress RF transmission in a reliable way, e.g., because you're
| | on a plane or about to enter an ICU, rfkill is a good choice.
| |
| | I'm only saying that there are better choices than rfkill if
| | you're looking for a power saving mechanism.
|| Ah fair enough.
|| So to be clear we have rfkill as RF kill and pull the module as power
| management.
Thanks for the patch, sent it on stable-tracking.
- -Andy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAklwbzwACgkQOjLpvpq7dMqVrgCbBz1/bu8eOBx4e7m6TJtk0FvY
ZC8AnjSCg/8NaRfhDKmfSGnClURlL+9o
=YIhI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----