... to spread the cement of brotherly love and affection, that cement
which unites us into one sacred band or society of brothers, among whom no
contention should ever exist, but that noble emulation of who can best
work or best agree ...

Masonic quotes by Brothers

MASONIC PENALTIES

Many Masons believe that the penalties of our
obligations are land-marks handed down from antiquity. This is not so. The Old
Charges or Manuscripts, the first being the Regius Poem written in 1390 A.D.,
all contain Charges or "land-marks" that we use today, but not until the
Edinburgh Register House Manuscript of 1696 was there any mention of a
penalty.

Most of the books written about Masonry
between 1696 and 1750 were exposures. Of the thirteen written before 1726,
none mention a penalty; the seven written after that do.

In 1727, ten years after the formation of the
Grand Lodge of England, "A Masons Confession" was published in Scotland and
contained the first penalty to be found within an obligation.

The Wilkinson Manuscript was written in 1727,
and included all three penalties and an early version of the Entered
Apprentice Lecture. The unique thing about that is that there still may
have been only one degree at that time.

The most famous Masonic exposure, "Masonry
Dissected," was written in 1730 by Samuel Prichard, and in it, for the first time ever, three degrees are
mentioned. A ritual is given for each degree, but all three penalties were
again listed with the Entered Apprentice Degree.

Then, in "Three Distinct Knocks", published
in 1760, a separate penalty was given with each degree, each quite similar to
those we use today. And, interestingly enough, when the two main Grand Lodges
of England merged in 1813, a non-physical penalty was added to the Entered
Apprentice obligation and went like this:

" . . . or that being branded as a willfully
perjured individual, void of all moral worth, and totally unfit to be
received into this or any other worthy and warranted Lodge, or the society
of men who prize honor and virtue above the external advantages of rank and
fortune . . ."

It is obvious that
the penalties have never been etched in stone. They have gone from an
obligation without a penalty, to one with one penalty, to three obligations
with a separate penalty for each, to a non-physical penalty in 1813, and
to many changes in the wording through the years. Some Grand Lodges have
changed them in recent years. In 1986, the Grand Lodge of England removed them
from the obligations and put them in the lectures. The same has happened in
the majority of the Grand Lodges in Europe, two in Canada, Australia, New
Zealand, and several Grand Lodges thus far in the United States. Most Grand
Lodges have moved them to the lectures; none so far have completely
removed them. It is known that quite a few American Grand Lodges are
considering such a move.

The questions are these: Should we retain a
form of punishment that, Masonically, has never been inflicted as far as
anyone knows and would be against the law if we did? In the obligation, should
we simply bind a candidate symbolically to "the ancient penalty
as stated in the lecture to follow?" Should we continue to threaten a
candidate with bodily harm for revealing secrets that long ago ceased to be
secrets? These are questions for thought, Brethren.

This site is not an official site of any recognized Masonic body in the United
States or elsewhere.
It is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the views
or opinion
of Freemasonry, nor webmaster nor those of any
other regular Masonic body other than those stated.