IT's a big debate really. Union requiresthe Team-play, set tactics and all round balanced areas of play on the field, such as a big pack with fast backs.But Leagues about being incredibly fit and still being able to make a hit.

League is a bunch of brainless bufoons?! yeah great grammar and great argumument from yourself. Both codes are great and both have their advantages and disadvantages. Also both produce great players with it being interesting to note that both tries in the 2003 WC final were scored by ex rugby league players. Also there are more tries per game in rugby league which means ots largely more enternaing to watch, despite being yers behind in terms of development.

i agree with the comment one above me, anonymousboth have their highs and lows in the gamei think league is a fairer encounter because you cant really kill the ball using the forwards as easy as in union, but then again union requires the skill to be able to beat an opposition holding the ball so tight, thats just one comparison, and i think is a good one because the two games are good shows of fitness, skill, strength and brains. (brains comment directed at Zimunya, both games show a degree of it not just one), its all down to personal preference and im in the middle so its easy to see the good and bad of bothpersonally i would watch a union game rather than league but i still really love league