Based on basic physics, the Boeing 777 ‘skin’ problems became my most likely scenario based on the very limited evidence. But, the exact specifics require aviation expertise, which is not in my specialties. Confirmation of that theory is included in this article. Based on the quote “A spokesman for Malaysia Airlines had confirmed on Tuesday that the missing aircraft had been serviced on February 23, with further maintenance scheduled for June 19.”, the most likely scenario is routine maintenance check with another one scheduled 4 months later.)

Senior official claims missing Boeing 777 was “airworthy” but Malaysia Airlines chief executive admits he does not know if it had been checked for signs of a potentially devastating structural issue raised by US authorities last year

By Tom Phillips, and Nick Collins 6:55PM GMT 12 Mar 2014

(Transporters Note: Based on basic physics, the Boeing 777 ‘skin’ problems became my most likely scenario based on the very limited evidence. But, the exact specifics require aviation expertise, which is not in my specialties. Confirmation of that theory is included in this article. Based on the quote “A spokesman for Malaysia Airlines had confirmed on Tuesday that the missing aircraft had been serviced on February 23, with further maintenance scheduled for June 19.”, the most likely scenario is routine maintenance check with another one scheduled 4 months later.)

A Boeing 777 which went missing after taking off from Malaysia was “airworthy”, officials have insisted as questions emerged over whether warnings about potential safety problems had been heeded.

Airlines around the world were warned by the US Federal Aviation Administration last year that all Boeing 777s should be checked for signs of cracking under the skin of the fuselage which “could lead to rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity of the aeroplane”.

But although the chief executive of Malaysia Airlines insisted the carrier had received and acted upon the directive, he was unable to confirm whether the safety check had yet been carried out on the missing aircraft.

Ahmad Jauhari Yahya told reporters on Wednesday: “We ensure that all our aircraft are airworthy and comply to all the ADs [Airworthiness Directives] and the SBs [service bulletins].”

But asked whether the missing Boeing 777-200ER had been checked for the specific problem following the FAA’s November directive, he admitted he would have to “check on the record” whether tests had taken place yet.

“Generally, every aircraft…has to comply,” he told The Telegraph on Wednesday. “But you must understand that certain directives have a time-line to be complied [with].”

A spokesman for Malaysia Airlines had confirmed on Tuesday that the missing aircraft had been serviced on February 23, with further maintenance scheduled for June 19.

A commercial airline captain who trains pilots to fly Boeing 777 aircraft, who did not want to be named, told The Telegraph that a “catastrophic failure” caused by a fault such as a crack in the fuselage was the most likely explanation for the disappearance.

“This was obviously a catastrophic failure or break-up at some stage where the pilots had no time to send out messages or alerts or anything like that,” he said.

What is now being looked at “is the integrity of the aircraft and its systems,” he added. “The “All aeroplanes will have little cracks somewhere from wear and tear, but it is how they are managed that we are talking about.”

James Healy-Pratt, an aviation lawyer who has represented bereaved families in other air accidents, claimed that Malaysian Airlines had declined to buy Boeing’s advanced “Airplane Health Management” system which monitors systems and parts in real time and could have alerted it to any potential problems with the fuselage.

“That sort of information could have been invaluable for the [bereaved] families and investigators,” he said. Malaysian Airlines was unable to confirm whether it was using the system.

Alastair Rosenschein, a former British Airways captain, told Sky News that the aircraft’s disappearance could have been caused by a rapid loss of pressure which caused the crew to lose consciousness.

The situation has occurred before, on a Helios Airways flight in 2005, and would have resulted in the plane continuing on autopilot for up to 3,000 miles before its fuel ran out over the middle of the Indian Ocean, he claimed.

But despite the host of theories being proposed as to the fate of the aeroplane Steve Landells, a flight safety specialist at the British Airline Pilots Association, said none had yet offered a convincing explanation.

“It is a very safe aeroplane, it has had very few hull losses over the years and when they have gone down the reasons have been discovered,” he said, adding that it is common for the FAA to issue directives for all aircraft models.

“There are plenty of people speculating on the news and some of the theories have some credibility but there seem to be holes in every single theory that has been put out so far,” he said. “We have discussed it within our expert groups and nothing fits…it is the most bizarre situation we have ever come across”.

A good general rule: The temperature at 35,000 feet: The International Standard Temperature (ISA) at 35,000′ is approximately -55 degrees C. Remember, 2 degrees per 1000′ 35,000 x 2= 70 degrees ISA at Sea Level= +15 15-70= -55 degrees C (or about -67 degrees F). Confirmed by http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/standard-atmosphere-d_604.html , which also gives density and pressure at 35,000 feet. Pressure is only 23.6% of sea level pressure, density of the air/oxygen is 31% of sea level.

When Humans Fly High: What Pilots Should Know About High-Altitude Physiology, Hypoxia, and Rapid Decompression

“At 25,000 feet the oxygen saturation is only 55% and consciousness is lost. (Note that the partial pressure of oxygen in alveolar air at 25,000 feet is 14% of 281.8 mm Hg or 39.5 mm Hg — slightly less than that normally found in venous blood returning from the tissues. Which way do you think the oxygen will diffuse at altitudes above 25,000 feet?)” Now that’s just oxygen, there are several more factors that need to be considered and they are all deadly. A well referenced and easily understood article with just basic science as a background for the reader. http://www.avweb.com/news/aeromed/181893-1.html?redirected=1

What Is Wrong With the US government and all its accessories before and after the fact? Nothing that Work Strikes, Boycotts, Trials*, Accountability, and a quick dance at the end of a rope won’t fix. * Constitutional Trials: Based on all ‘laws’ and ‘rights’ granted or denied by the Original Intent Interpretation of the Constitution and in particular the Bill of Rights – The only interpretation allowed by the Constitution.

Dr. Ed Ward MD, AS, BS, MD – Reporting and investigating Constitutional abuses of the US government for almost 2 decades. AS, BS in Medical Technology – Minor in Organic Chemistry and Physics, volunteer during the Viet Nam war 6 years stateside active duty ‘med tech’ ‘US Air Farce’ – a decade experience in Medical Technology. MD degree from LSU, New Orleans – 2 decades in the field of General Practice. (My) Articles are also referenced by valid experts in their field.

About: Ed Ward, MD’s Blog of Referenced Facts, and Me, Dr Ed Ward, MD Congratulations! If you’ve made it here, you’ve made it through a MASSIVE Maze of government propaganda, censorship, and Psyops. To the Best of my Knowledge and Evaluation, You will only find the referenced, pertinent facts for the ID and Remedy of Our governments fascism, as well as world wide government fascism here… Continues http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/about/ Dr Ed