The Biggest Box Office Hits and Flops of 2018

The Biggest Box Office Hits and Flops of 2018

It was the revival nobody saw coming. After a dismal 2017, in which the North American box office tumbled to a three-year low, moviegoing rebounded in a big way. And it wasn’t just superhero tentpoles and animated adventures raking in the green. With all due respect to “Avengers: Infinity War” and “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,” the reason grosses are inching toward last year’s internationally fueled $40 billion global record is that breakouts such as “Crazy Rich Asians” and “A Quiet Place” provided an unexpected lift. That’s not to say studios got off scot-free. In between the blockbusters were a number of embarrassing money-losing bombs.

When evaluating a film’s profitability, grosses alone don’t tell the whole story. For instance, “Solo: A Star Wars Story” took in $392 million worldwide. That looks lucrative on paper, but after factoring in a production budget of nearly $300 million and marketing costs upwards of $150 million, getting the movie in the black gets a little … gray. Ancillary markets like DVD rentals and sales, pay-TV deals and internet streaming can help mitigate losses. For this analysis,Varietyfocused solely on how profitable (or not) a movie was at the worldwide box office.

Here are some of 2018’s most notable smashes and flops:

HITS:

Marvel proves time and again that superhero fatigue doesn’t exist if you can serve audiences the right content. Ryan Coogler’s “Black Panther,” the first superhero movie to feature a predominantly black cast, was a cultural touchstone and broke records throughout its theatrical run, becoming the ninth-highest-grossing film of all time. Its comic-book universe cohort “Avengers: Infinity War” may have pocketed more at the global box office, but “Black Panther” has maintained its reign as the biggest movie in North America, with $700 million since it opened in February. Though at $2 billion “Infinity War” brought in quite the bounty for Disney and Marvel, it isn’t included on this list because its P&A costs were twice those of “Black Panther.”

“Incredibles 2”

Production budget: $200 millionGlobal box office: $1.24 billion

As expected, Disney produced more than one monster hit over the past 12 months. The Magic Kingdom has had massive success reviving its classics, and 10 years after “The Incredibles” theaters, the cartoon sequel became one of the year’s highest-grossing titles. It now ranks as the second-biggest animated movie ever, after “Frozen.”

“A Quiet Place”

Production budget: $17 millionGlobal box office: $340 million

We’re betting few expected Jim Halpert from “The Office” to make a horror movie that would turn into 2018’s strongest sleeper hit. But John Krasinski’s studio debut as a director crushed estimates to deliver a stellar bow, and then gained momentum. Though original properties don’t have a built-in fan base, they tend to be less costly to produce. Attribute it to glowing word of mouth or the curiosity of seeing Krasinski and his wife, Emily Blunt, play an on-screen couple, but “A Quiet Place” made some noise for a fraction of what many would-be blockbusters cost.

“The Nun”

Production budget: $22 millionGlobal box office: $365 million

New Line’s “Conjuring” universe draws audiences craving a good fright. The fifth installment in the supernatural moneymaker delivered the best receipts of any entry in the franchise. While sequels can be pricier to make, horror movies are so cheap to produce that in success, they bring outsized returns.

“Halloween”

Production budget: $10 millionGlobal box office: $252 million

Blumhouse, the indie film label from mega-producer Jason Blum, has made a name for itself with its low-budget approach to all things terrifying. For the most part, the horror maestro keeps budgets under $10 million. That means the studio, which has a pact with Universal Pictures, makes out like a bandit when a movie like “Halloween” delivers on the scares. With an assist from Jamie Lee Curtis, who revisits her role as avenging babysitter-turned-grandmother Laurie Strode, the 11th entry in the series was hailed as a return to form. It boasted the best opening weekend for a movie with a female lead over the age of 55, and it’s now the most successful slasher film of all time.

Warner Bros. made a bold bet with “Crazy Rich Asians,” the first studio movie in 25 years composed of an all Asian-American cast. The risk paid off. The acclaimed adaptation of Kevin Kwan’s novel became the highest-grossing romantic comedy in a decade, proving that movies with diverse casting can find mainstream appeal and make a pretty penny. To nobody’s surprise, a sequel is in the works.

FLOPS:

“Robin Hood”

Production budget: $100 millionGlobal box office: $65 million

“Robin Hood” may still be in theaters, but when we take off our rose-colored 3D glasses, it doesn’t look good for the swashbuckling thief in green. Lionsgate’s big-budget take on the folk tale is shaping up to be the dud of the year by a landslide. It seemed to have everything working against it — a competitive Thanksgiving release date, a hefty price tag and savage reviews. It’s safe to say studios won’t be returning to Sherwood Forest anytime soon.

“The Nutcracker and the Four Realms”

CREDIT: LAURIE SPARHAM

Production budget: $120 millionGlobal box office: $138 million

Even Disney can make a misstep at the multiplexes. The Burbank entertainment giant commands nearly 30% of the domestic box office, double that of its nearest rival. Yet “The Nutcracker and the Four Realms” proves that not even the top studio can make it through 2018 unscathed. Marvel and Pixar have been reliable moneymakers, but beyond that, Disney has stumbled when it comes to making live-action movies that don’t involve branded IP. The studio shelled out for the family-friendly fantasy, but “The Nutcracker” simply couldn’t pirouette its way into audiences’ hearts.

Not even the powerhouse trio of Oprah Winfrey, Reese Witherspoon and Mindy Kaling, plus acclaimed director Ava DuVernay, could save the film adaptation of Madeleine L’Engle’s classic novel. The advertising budget propelled costs above $250 million, meaning Disney lost a sizable chunk of cash on the sci-fi epic.

“The Girl in the Spider’s Web”

Production budget: $43 millionGlobal box office: $31 million

“The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo,” Hollywood’s first take on the hit book series by Stieg Larsson, was such a success, it makes perfect sense that Sony would come back for seconds. But without David Fincher at the helm and Rooney Mara as computer hacker Lisbeth Salander, “The Girl in the Spider’s Web” was ignored at multiplexes. To be fair, “Dragon Tattoo” was twice as expensive to make, but that doesn’t mean a miss like this is any less painful.

“Happytime Murders”

Production budget: $40 millionGlobal box office: $27 million

We can’t help wondering who this R-rated gonzo black comedy was made for. STX coughed up $40 million to produce a bizarre take on “Sesame Street” that answered the question: What would happen if the Muppets did a lot of coke and frequented prostitutes? That family-unfriendly premise, coupled with brutal reviews, didn’t help sell a movie featuring plush toys gone wild. Star Melissa McCarthy — working live alongside the puppets — didn’t earn her rumored $17 million salary on this one.

“Sisters Brothers”

Production budget: $38 millionGlobal box office: $9 million

Sisters Brothers” is the only bust on this list that critics actually seemed to enjoy. That wasn’t enough to garner audience interest and salvage Annapurna’s dark Western comedy starring John C. Reilly and Joaquin Phoenix, the first English-language movie for French auteur Jacques Audiard. The movie grossed a disastrous $3 million in North America and $6 million overseas. “Sisters Brothers” was also more expensive than the average indie, costing $38 million to produce. Oh, brother.

Crazy Rich Asians should teach H’wood that movies about contemporary life, when well done, are what interests audiences more than yet another Western or rehashed fairy tale, or ancient IP.let’s also not forget how King Arthur bombed last year

Most viewers (at least those who never read the book in fourth grade) didn’t know a thing about the story EXCEPT that Oprah was in it, and stayed away in droves.That, like Hillary’s ’08 campaign, should be early enough indication of Oprah’s popularity with the masses.

As for Disney’s “fantasy failure” with the Nutcracker, that was just as weird-looking, but at least Wrinkle had an existing book to make it relativelysane.

Venom, like Halloween, came out in an empty October front-loaded by an opening-weekend fan pilgrimage that was wishfully expected WAYYYY more from the movie than they got.There’s “Hits”, and then there’s “Hits” that are actuallypopular.

And why was it “surprising” to find out that China didn’t want to see other countries’ movies about Chinese people?As “Fantastic Beasts 2” proved, we Americans didn’t want to see other countries’ ideas of what American people were like.

If you’veSEENthe movie, that’s seriously debatable.Most credited Nutcracker as “Based on an overexposed Disney Tim Burton movie that so lost its trendy popularity eight years ago, that even the sequel tanked at the B.O.”

Solo is a flop. A very big one considering it’s a movie from the successful until now Star Wars franchise.The budget of Solo was $300M, check IMDb. It gained $392M.With the advertising, promotion etc Disney spent about $500M and got in return $392M.It is a flop.

The Sisters Brothers is an interesting film, but how did anyone think this small, strange, meandering Western would make a profit off a $38m budget? It should have cost a quarter of that. (And it would have still lost money!)

“True Grit” cost just as much, but was the biggest hit of the Coen brothers.(Megan Ellison was involved as an exec producer)“Hostiles” cost as much as “The Sisters brothers”, too, but was released wide.

The budget was maybe too high, but not excessive.

And this article is wrong, when it suggests that Annapurna paid for everything.They only bought North American rights for $ 7.5 mill., I read, which is a reasonablenumber, because it might make money through other platforms, since the westerngenre, Audiard’s name and the excellent reviews promise a longer shelf-life.

The $ 9 mill. number is also NOT the final worldwide number:That’s only the combined box-office of the USA and France.(In France it did respectable business.)

“Though at $2 billion “Infinity War” brought in quite the bounty for Disney and Marvel, it isn’t included on this list because its P&A costs were twice those of “Black Panther.”

And the extra 700 MILLION it made worldwide didn’t EASILY more then compensate for those costs likely between 100M – 200M. A pretty ridiculous omission based on a justification that doesn’t make much sense put under a magnifying glass.

Some thoughts. Robin Hood is still a viable story. Try doing it straight up. Stop dumbing it down or updating and fixing it.When has Milissa McCarthy ever been worth $17 million?Sisters Brothers, a truly terrible name.

It was the revival nobody saw coming. After a dismal 2017, in which the North American box office tumbled to a three-year low, moviegoing rebounded in a big way. And it wasn’t just superhero tentpoles and animated adventures raking in the green. With all due respect to “Avengers: Infinity War” and “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,” the reason grosses are inching toward last year’s internationally fueled $40 billion global record is that breakouts such as “Crazy Rich Asians” and “A Quiet Place” provided an unexpected lift. That’s not to say studios got off scot-free. In between the blockbusters were a number of embarrassing money-losing bombs.

When evaluating a film’s profitability, grosses alone don’t tell the whole story. For instance, “Solo: A Star Wars Story” took in $392 million worldwide. That looks lucrative on paper, but after factoring in a production budget of nearly $300 million and marketing costs upwards of $150 million, getting the movie in the black gets a little … gray. Ancillary markets like DVD rentals and sales, pay-TV deals and internet streaming can help mitigate losses. For this analysis,Varietyfocused solely on how profitable (or not) a movie was at the worldwide box office.

Here are some of 2018’s most notable smashes and flops:

HITS:

Marvel proves time and again that superhero fatigue doesn’t exist if you can serve audiences the right content. Ryan Coogler’s “Black Panther,” the first superhero movie to feature a predominantly black cast, was a cultural touchstone and broke records throughout its theatrical run, becoming the ninth-highest-grossing film of all time. Its comic-book universe cohort “Avengers: Infinity War” may have pocketed more at the global box office, but “Black Panther” has maintained its reign as the biggest movie in North America, with $700 million since it opened in February. Though at $2 billion “Infinity War” brought in quite the bounty for Disney and Marvel, it isn’t included on this list because its P&A costs were twice those of “Black Panther.”

“Incredibles 2”

Production budget: $200 millionGlobal box office: $1.24 billion

As expected, Disney produced more than one monster hit over the past 12 months. The Magic Kingdom has had massive success reviving its classics, and 10 years after “The Incredibles” theaters, the cartoon sequel became one of the year’s highest-grossing titles. It now ranks as the second-biggest animated movie ever, after “Frozen.”

“A Quiet Place”

Production budget: $17 millionGlobal box office: $340 million

We’re betting few expected Jim Halpert from “The Office” to make a horror movie that would turn into 2018’s strongest sleeper hit. But John Krasinski’s studio debut as a director crushed estimates to deliver a stellar bow, and then gained momentum. Though original properties don’t have a built-in fan base, they tend to be less costly to produce. Attribute it to glowing word of mouth or the curiosity of seeing Krasinski and his wife, Emily Blunt, play an on-screen couple, but “A Quiet Place” made some noise for a fraction of what many would-be blockbusters cost.

“The Nun”

Production budget: $22 millionGlobal box office: $365 million

New Line’s “Conjuring” universe draws audiences craving a good fright. The fifth installment in the supernatural moneymaker delivered the best receipts of any entry in the franchise. While sequels can be pricier to make, horror movies are so cheap to produce that in success, they bring outsized returns.

“Halloween”

Production budget: $10 millionGlobal box office: $252 million

Blumhouse, the indie film label from mega-producer Jason Blum, has made a name for itself with its low-budget approach to all things terrifying. For the most part, the horror maestro keeps budgets under $10 million. That means the studio, which has a pact with Universal Pictures, makes out like a bandit when a movie like “Halloween” delivers on the scares. With an assist from Jamie Lee Curtis, who revisits her role as avenging babysitter-turned-grandmother Laurie Strode, the 11th entry in the series was hailed as a return to form. It boasted the best opening weekend for a movie with a female lead over the age of 55, and it’s now the most successful slasher film of all time.

Warner Bros. made a bold bet with “Crazy Rich Asians,” the first studio movie in 25 years composed of an all Asian-American cast. The risk paid off. The acclaimed adaptation of Kevin Kwan’s novel became the highest-grossing romantic comedy in a decade, proving that movies with diverse casting can find mainstream appeal and make a pretty penny. To nobody’s surprise, a sequel is in the works.

FLOPS:

“Robin Hood”

Production budget: $100 millionGlobal box office: $65 million

“Robin Hood” may still be in theaters, but when we take off our rose-colored 3D glasses, it doesn’t look good for the swashbuckling thief in green. Lionsgate’s big-budget take on the folk tale is shaping up to be the dud of the year by a landslide. It seemed to have everything working against it — a competitive Thanksgiving release date, a hefty price tag and savage reviews. It’s safe to say studios won’t be returning to Sherwood Forest anytime soon.

“The Nutcracker and the Four Realms”

CREDIT: LAURIE SPARHAM

Production budget: $120 millionGlobal box office: $138 million

Even Disney can make a misstep at the multiplexes. The Burbank entertainment giant commands nearly 30% of the domestic box office, double that of its nearest rival. Yet “The Nutcracker and the Four Realms” proves that not even the top studio can make it through 2018 unscathed. Marvel and Pixar have been reliable moneymakers, but beyond that, Disney has stumbled when it comes to making live-action movies that don’t involve branded IP. The studio shelled out for the family-friendly fantasy, but “The Nutcracker” simply couldn’t pirouette its way into audiences’ hearts.

Not even the powerhouse trio of Oprah Winfrey, Reese Witherspoon and Mindy Kaling, plus acclaimed director Ava DuVernay, could save the film adaptation of Madeleine L’Engle’s classic novel. The advertising budget propelled costs above $250 million, meaning Disney lost a sizable chunk of cash on the sci-fi epic.

“The Girl in the Spider’s Web”

Production budget: $43 millionGlobal box office: $31 million

“The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo,” Hollywood’s first take on the hit book series by Stieg Larsson, was such a success, it makes perfect sense that Sony would come back for seconds. But without David Fincher at the helm and Rooney Mara as computer hacker Lisbeth Salander, “The Girl in the Spider’s Web” was ignored at multiplexes. To be fair, “Dragon Tattoo” was twice as expensive to make, but that doesn’t mean a miss like this is any less painful.

“Happytime Murders”

Production budget: $40 millionGlobal box office: $27 million

We can’t help wondering who this R-rated gonzo black comedy was made for. STX coughed up $40 million to produce a bizarre take on “Sesame Street” that answered the question: What would happen if the Muppets did a lot of coke and frequented prostitutes? That family-unfriendly premise, coupled with brutal reviews, didn’t help sell a movie featuring plush toys gone wild. Star Melissa McCarthy — working live alongside the puppets — didn’t earn her rumored $17 million salary on this one.

“Sisters Brothers”

Production budget: $38 millionGlobal box office: $9 million

Sisters Brothers” is the only bust on this list that critics actually seemed to enjoy. That wasn’t enough to garner audience interest and salvage Annapurna’s dark Western comedy starring John C. Reilly and Joaquin Phoenix, the first English-language movie for French auteur Jacques Audiard. The movie grossed a disastrous $3 million in North America and $6 million overseas. “Sisters Brothers” was also more expensive than the average indie, costing $38 million to produce. Oh, brother.

Crazy Rich Asians should teach H’wood that movies about contemporary life, when well done, are what interests audiences more than yet another Western or rehashed fairy tale, or ancient IP.let’s also not forget how King Arthur bombed last year

Most viewers (at least those who never read the book in fourth grade) didn’t know a thing about the story EXCEPT that Oprah was in it, and stayed away in droves.That, like Hillary’s ’08 campaign, should be early enough indication of Oprah’s popularity with the masses.

As for Disney’s “fantasy failure” with the Nutcracker, that was just as weird-looking, but at least Wrinkle had an existing book to make it relativelysane.

Venom, like Halloween, came out in an empty October front-loaded by an opening-weekend fan pilgrimage that was wishfully expected WAYYYY more from the movie than they got.There’s “Hits”, and then there’s “Hits” that are actuallypopular.

And why was it “surprising” to find out that China didn’t want to see other countries’ movies about Chinese people?As “Fantastic Beasts 2” proved, we Americans didn’t want to see other countries’ ideas of what American people were like.

If you’veSEENthe movie, that’s seriously debatable.Most credited Nutcracker as “Based on an overexposed Disney Tim Burton movie that so lost its trendy popularity eight years ago, that even the sequel tanked at the B.O.”

Solo is a flop. A very big one considering it’s a movie from the successful until now Star Wars franchise.The budget of Solo was $300M, check IMDb. It gained $392M.With the advertising, promotion etc Disney spent about $500M and got in return $392M.It is a flop.

The Sisters Brothers is an interesting film, but how did anyone think this small, strange, meandering Western would make a profit off a $38m budget? It should have cost a quarter of that. (And it would have still lost money!)

“True Grit” cost just as much, but was the biggest hit of the Coen brothers.(Megan Ellison was involved as an exec producer)“Hostiles” cost as much as “The Sisters brothers”, too, but was released wide.

The budget was maybe too high, but not excessive.

And this article is wrong, when it suggests that Annapurna paid for everything.They only bought North American rights for $ 7.5 mill., I read, which is a reasonablenumber, because it might make money through other platforms, since the westerngenre, Audiard’s name and the excellent reviews promise a longer shelf-life.

The $ 9 mill. number is also NOT the final worldwide number:That’s only the combined box-office of the USA and France.(In France it did respectable business.)

“Though at $2 billion “Infinity War” brought in quite the bounty for Disney and Marvel, it isn’t included on this list because its P&A costs were twice those of “Black Panther.”

And the extra 700 MILLION it made worldwide didn’t EASILY more then compensate for those costs likely between 100M – 200M. A pretty ridiculous omission based on a justification that doesn’t make much sense put under a magnifying glass.

Some thoughts. Robin Hood is still a viable story. Try doing it straight up. Stop dumbing it down or updating and fixing it.When has Milissa McCarthy ever been worth $17 million?Sisters Brothers, a truly terrible name.

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Published by Kreative Npresssions

Kreative Npressions is a Lifestyle Blog of Living, Loving, and Enjoying the Journey of Life with Fashion,Entertainment,Travel, Food, Family “The Things that Really Matter”! Kreate Your Own Happiness, Life is Too Short to Live Unhappy, You Only Get “ONE TRIP” "ENJOY the JOURNEY" www.kreativenpressions.org
View all posts by Kreative Npresssions