How many times does Neil Armstrong lie to us in this 1970 BBC interview.

Actually, the interview with Patrick Moore was one of the most focussed interviews I have ever seen between two pretty innocent parties for the time,
it was a discourse about the experience.
We know they went to the moon, that is not in dispute.

I think this thread should have been titled "I think Neil Armstrong is lying because what he says goes against my warped world view for which I have
no evidence" but that's just me and my desire to deny ignorance, not read about it in detail.

Originally posted by PsykoOps
It's hilarious how well this thread demonstrated the moon hoaxer crowds. It attracts 2 types of people. The liars who make up the claims in their YT
vidoes. After that the believers who dont even bother to check any facts see that and go around the web repeating the claims. When they are proven
wrong they yell "NASA lies, We've proven it!" like a child with a temper tandrum and they claim victory. Never mind reality or anything like that

c'mon,...i mean people that question something the government did....that's never done here on ATS...the moon landing and 9/11 are never, ever,
supposed to be questioned. only retards and idiots would do that.
now....anything said or done by Obama...those are always called into question...

It's not questioning that's the problem, it's the people that, no matter what the evidence, believe what they want to believe, even after being
shown without any shadow of a doubt, that they are wrong. Trying to prove the moon landing happened to a hoax believer is the same as trying to prove
evolution to a creationist. They don't care what the evidence shows because their belief system is faith based, not evidence based.

Originally posted by captainpudding
I think this thread should have been titled "I think Neil Armstrong is lying because what he says goes against my warped world view for which I have
no evidence" but that's just me and my desire to deny ignorance, not read about it in detail.

Originally posted by Raffles
I've been a follower of the moon landing threads on ATS and other sites for years.

What i find strange is why would these so called debunkers come to a conspiricy site in the first place, and spend year upon year defending nasa ?

Quite simple really. The motto of this site is to "deny ignorance" the motto of hoax believers is "be ignorant". We come here to deny
ignorance. Conspiracy theories need evidence, if you don't present any evidence it's not a theory. A real conspiracy theorist actually looks at
the evidence and makes a conclusion, the hoax believers make a conclusion then look for evidence.

Why would a said poster spend 4-5 years posting on the same topic and nothing else for year upon year, it doesn't make any sense unless he has an
agender.

I've been a member of this site longer than most and it this topic intrigues me more than any other, the amount of hatred that comes from the pro
nasa side against the hoax side is amazing and also very telling.

What i want to know is why do you guys care so much about what I THINK ?

If i wanna think the moon landings are fake so be it, what does it matter to you ?

I'm happy to talk about the moon landings with posters like jra but not with the rest of the nasa defenders that have shown up in the past few years
most are bunch of nasty posters imho, and i don't blame jarrah white for not showing up here, it would have been great if he did turn up and debated
jra a class act imho

Guess what i've even had lunch at the kennedy space center with charlie duke, a moment i will remember for the rest of my life but having said that i
now believe they where fake. and yes charlie was asked if the moon landings where fake, you can guess what his answer was

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.