Visualizing Wisconsin's Voter ID Lawsuits So Far

Republish this content

WisContext serves the residents of Wisconsin, providing information and insight into issues as they affect the state. We report on these issues, drawing upon the resources of our project partners: Wisconsin Public Radio and Wisconsin Public Television. We want to share what we've learned, and you are welcome to republish our articles online and/or in print subject to the following guidelines:

Only articles credited to WisContext or its partners Wisconsin Public Radio and Wisconsin Public Television may be republished. If an article is credited to another organization, it is not available for republishing from our website under these guidelines.

Articles may not be edited, except to fit a publication’s house style requirements or to shorten it. If an article is shortened, please add the note "This item was edited for length." If republishing online, please try to retain links that are already included in the article.

Please credit the article to the original author(s) and WisContext. Please use this style: [Author name], WisContext (or any of the three partner organizations if the item is originally credited to them). Please also link to wiscontext.org in the credit.

When republishing any WisContext article, this credit must be included: [Article Title] was originally published on WisContext, which produced the article in a partnership between Wisconsin Public Radio and Wisconsin Public Television.

By republishing articles under these guidelines, you agree to immediately remove our content from your site if we contact you and request that you do so.

Photos, graphics and data visualizations may be republished with articles if they are credited to WisContext or its partners: Wisconsin Public Radio and Wisconsin Public Television. They may not be published separately from articles. If photos, graphics or data visualizations are not credited to WisContext or its partners, they may only be republished per their original copyright restrictions. (WisContext often uses Creative Commons-licensed images, and follows their republishing guidelines.)

WisContext articles may not be sold. Please do not sell advertising against WisContext articles, but they may be republished online or in print with existing ads.

If you republish our articles, please send us a note with a link to where it appears. Thank you for sharing!

Wisconsin's voter-ID requirements, signed into law in 2011 as Act 23, is a signature agenda item for Gov. Scott Walker and the state legislature's Republican majority. But its passage set off more than five years of wrangling in the courts — a struggle that has yet to be settled.

The state's voter ID law has faced two state-level lawsuits and multiple federal suits since 2011. These lawsuits have challenged the law on constitutional grounds.

At the state level, those challenges ended in July 2014, when the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in favor of the law in two cases, League of Women Voters v. Walker and Milwaukee Branch of the NAACP v. Walker. In federal court, the status of those three suits are far more tangled, with different levels of circuit and appellate judges batting the constitutionality of Act 23 back and forth, affirming some components of the law while invalidating others, alternately enjoining and upholding the law.

To make things even more complicated, one federal lawsuit, the American Civil Liberties Union-backed Frank v. Walker, died and came back to life. The United States Supreme Court declined to hear the case in March 2015. That usually spells the end of a lawsuit, but the ACLU succeeded in petitioning lower courts to revisit a more narrowly focused version of the Frank challenge. Another federal suit, One Wisconsin Institute v. Nichol, also remains up in the air.

As a result, Wisconsin's voter ID law hasn't actually been in effect for many elections. When voter ID has been required — most notably in the record-turnout presidential primary and state supreme court election on April 5, 2016 — it has been with different conditions and exceptions in different elections.

The Voter ID law will be in effect on Nov. 8, when Wisconsinites vote for president and decide a bitterly fought rematch between Sen. Ron Johnson and former Sen. Russ Feingold. One thing that's new: As a result of the legal battles over Act 23 and other election laws in Wisconsin, at least some voters will experience the earliest early-voting dates in state history. (Residents who haven't voted early before can learn about the process in a Wisconsin Public Radio guide).

In Wisconsin and nationally, more voters and commentators — and more importantly, judges — have become increasingly convinced that voter ID laws are a Republican-supported ploy to suppress voters in college, among communities of color and others more likely to support Democratic candidates. Meanwhile, people supporting ID requirements continue to insist there's a widespread problem with voter impersonation, but have yet to turn up strong evidence of it happening. A onetime staffer for former Republican state senator Dale Schultz explosively asserted in April 2016 that GOP lawmakers openly talked about targeting minority and college-aged voters while crafting Wisconsin's voter ID law. Meanwhile, North Carolina's voter ID law, seen as one of the most stringent in the nation, was struck down in August by the divided U.S. Supreme Court.

The future of Act 23 is in the hands of federal appellate and circuit court judges in Frank v. Walker and One Wisconsin Institute v. Nichol. The visualization at top and an interactive timeline explain how Wisconsin and its voters arrived in this position.

Commenting Policy

WisContext welcomes civil, on-topic comments and opinions that advance the discussion from all perspectives of an issue. Comments containing outside links (URLs) will only be posted after they’ve been approved by a moderator. WisContext will delete comments that violate our guidelines. Visit our social media guidelines for more information about these policies.