Private Security Guards Repel Somali Pirates

No background on this clip from liveleak.com showing private security guards using ye olde M4 to discourage Somali pirates from boarding a commercial vessel going about its business off the coast of Africa. Methinks it’s only a matter of time before the pirates alter their strategy. And the guards end-up paraphrasing Bullwinkle J. Moose: I gotta get me a bigger gun. [h/t Bryan]

I forgot who wrote it, but there’s a pretty neat short story called “to repel boarders” about a different sort of modern-day pirate.
Another take on piracy: Seized, by Max Hardberger – ships seized by thieves changing ships registry paperwork with the help of corrupt third-world magistrates.

Funny this came up. The other day when the “mega whatever” lottery was so high my buddy told me if he won he’d love to buy an opulent, very gaudy yet armored yacht just to sail those very seas to draw in pirates. He was thinking M2’s all around but I told him to hell with those and get a few 25mm Bushmasters. Beautiful weather, calm seas, endless beers and plenty of deserving targets – my kind of vacation.

Please remember that the pirates used to be fishermen, but illegal harvesting by international fishing boats (no central government to protect their waters) and illegal dumping of toxic wastes have destroyed their livelihood. What they are doing is wrong, and they should be repelled, but let’s not be gleeful of their deaths.

Actually the corruption and collapse of their entire country has more to do with it. Sure illegal fishing and dumping has to do with it, but there is only so much you can blame others for. If that is the case, why don’t they go blast commercial fishing boats and barges?

Their circumstances suck no doubt, but piracy should not be tolerated.

Unfortunate circumstace does NOT excuse piracy. It’s unfortunate that, in the eyes of some, seeking out and confronting evil is now murder in their minds. A weak and flawed ideology that ensures evil will thrive forever.

Its not about evil… These guys are desperate and dangerous. Do they need to be stopped? Hell yes… but killing them isn’t something I’d celebrate… its the same thing as getting attacked by a wild animal. No malice.. but I’ll kill to defend.
The folks who really need killing? The pirate warlords who sit comfortably back on the coast while they send drugged up teenagers and assorted low-men on the totem pole to do the boarding. The boarders are totally expendable.. there were plenty of cases of boats breaking down and the pirate bases not even bothering to send another boat to rescue… just let them fend for themselves and die of thirst.

Ain’t murder if they’re sailing up to take over any ship. They’re playing a dangerous game and have displayed no problem killing innocent crew members. They are cruel people and cruelty just might beget cruelty. If turning the tables on murderers is murder then so be it.

It’s murder – regardless of circumstance – to, with malice aforethought (as APBTFan described), “he’d love to buy an opulent, very gaudy yet armored yacht just to sail those very seas to draw in pirates. He was thinking M2′s all around[…]”

That’s premeditated murder by any definition – moral, legal, biblical, or otherwise – knowingly putting yourself into a life or death situation with the intent of killing another human being for sport.

The response he left me is all too telling:“Ain’t murder if they’re sailing up to take over any ship. They’re playing a dangerous game and have displayed no problem killing innocent crew members. They are cruel people and cruelty just might beget cruelty. If turning the tables on murderers is murder then so be it.”

In fantasizing about taking another person’s life – under any circumstance – you’re clearly not playing with a full deck, and you’re the type of gun enthusiast that makes the rest of us look bad.

If you’re the _good_ “type of gun enthusiast,” does that mean you refrain from concealed carry, or in fact ANY plan to use a gun to defend yourself? Any preparation to use force falls under premeditation, as you use it.

Self defense is neither legally or morally wrong, whether or not you are prepared for it. Otherwise, why is it that the courts acknowledge “justifiable” homicide?

And biblically, it’s not wrong either. The commandment usually translated as not to “kill” is not easily translated from the original Hebrew. A lengthier and closer translation might be “to kill without justification, or unrighteously.

God certainly demonstrates the very real distinction between justifiable and unjustifiable homicide, since he commands law violators to be killed, while punishing unrighteous killing.

The friend fantasizing about his boat is going to an extreme to demonstrate his frustration with the state of war that exists but that our leaders refuse to prosecute. If that makes us the “bad” type of enthusiast so be it. I’m not going to constrain my choice of word or idiom to that which will not disturb a leftist.

Put down the can of beer, spit out the tobacco plug, and pay close attention.

I live just outside Detroit, Michigan. I have to drive through Detroit five, sometimes six, days a week to get to/from my place of employment. This is one of several reasons I carry a pistol with me everywhere I go. I think of possibilities, calculate odds, imagine possible scenarios, and otherwise do my best to mentally prepare for a life-or-death situation that may or may not ever arise.

Suppose, for an instance, I change up my tactics. Let’s say that on my way home at 3:30 in the morning (I work an oddball shift), I decide to take my car into a crime-plagued neighborhood, turn on the hazard lights, and park on the side of the street with the full intent of shooting potential carjackers or robbers as they appear. A carjacker is just a pirate on land, after all. Same methodology, same process, same goals.

Would that make me some kind of hero? Or just some armchair commando with masturbatory, superhero fantasies of ridding the biggest hellhole in America of its crime problem, one scumbag at a time?

Would I be doing my fellow gun owners any favors by publicly announcing my intentions? Would others, apparently with necks of varying degrees of redness, be doing anybody in the Gun Enthusiast community any favors by jumping in the middle of the circle-jerk and offering up their own adolescent fantasies?

Bit of a legal difference in that this is on the high seas in international waters. In theory (and I emphasize the theory part) there is a government in Detroit with deputized officers of the law whose job it is to keep the peace, investigate crimes and incarcerate offenders. At sea, not so much. There, you’re on your own, legally and literally.

None of that changes the fact that people who call themselves responsible gun owners and imagine themselves to be stand-up, law-abiding citizens are little more than barely-restrained killers.

They’ve already mentally dehumanized the enemy, and now are formulating “what if” and “how to” scenarios for going out, initiating contact (or baiting a trap, however you want to put it) and taking the life of another human being, supposedly in the name of upholding justice, but with the caveat that it’ll be some good, down-home fun. ‘Merka – F*** Yeah!

It’s sick, and that’s more non-human than anything Somali pirates may or may not be up to.

And, again, back to the carjacking scenario: DPD? Seriously? Upholding law & order? Get real. DPD is a patch of bubble gum over a crack in a crumbling dyke. The justified homicide rate is 2900% above national average. Unjustifiable homicide (read: murder) rate is legendary, and has been for decades. Rape and robbery, too. All the violent crimes, really.

So again, the question stands: Would that make me a hero of some sort? Laying in wait for some drug-addicted robber and ridding society of a problem?

Would you be terribly opposed to baiting murders out of the woodwork and killing them before they kill you? Could you be saving the lives of potential future victims? Would I do this? NO. Would I really care if someone is killing off murderers? That’s also a no.

There are plenty of yachts and other small water craft that are taken by pirates and the crew killed or sold into sexual slavery. The vessel is used for a couple of dope or human cargo runs and then sunk. I have ZERO issue with anyone killing any of the folks doing this.

“Put down the can of beer, spit out the tobacco plug, and pay close attention.”

Nice! Thanks for the Huffington Post generalization. Just to be clear I drink my beer from green bottles, don’t chew and have a very short attention span. Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe we should waste hundreds of millions of dollars to fix a broke ass country so we hopefully don’t have to shoot at druggie pirates. I wonder how much us taxpayers spent to have a SEAL team make head shots on them to save Captain Richard Phillips. Or how about the SEAL team that rescued an American and a Dane held captive by them. Lotta money compared to open season on pirates. That part of the world only understands and operates by force. Meet force with force. Call it ugly or immoral but that’s the currency there.

That’s not entirely true – killing other people is basic human nature. We have layers of socialization and morality that make us feel bad about doing that, but the basic instinct remains. You can go ahead and call me a sociopath, but why do you think zombie movies are so popular, and all these folks would love to shoot these pirates? It’s justified, guilt-free murder, and it appeals to our deepest, darkest most primitive instincts while neatly circumventing all the neat societal rules we’ve been raised to follow.

It’s not murder. These “pirates” are armed and come with hostile intent. If someone comes at you with clearly hostile intent, gets on your premises, breaks into your home, will you wait for him to shoot you or will you shoot him first?

I will shoot him first. Simple as that.

He doesn’t want to get shot? Then don’t come at me armed with hostile intentions.

Warning shots are too good for these buggers. Sink them, put the survivors on trial and hang them from the yard arm. That’s how the Royal Navy took care of the pirates in the past. And it worked.

There’s an entire fleet operating in that area and their success, despite the massive load of boats, has been barely worth mentioning this far. These “pirates” are nothing else but terrorists, they are not protected by any convention. Sink them without warning. Simple as that. They want to live? Well, then don’t go pirating.

If someone fires upon me no matter where I am at, that is justification enough for me to end the threat. If it’s international waters and someone fires or attempts to board me with ZERO legal authority to do so; I will do my best to end that threat as well.

Deck-mounted “hardware” would be lead to problems as soon as you hove into the view of the harbormaster’s field glasses. Best to stick with shoulder arms with punch that can be stowed well below deck as you leave international waters.

The next bigger stick beyond Bushmasters would be Javelins. Lock onto the IR sig of the outboard motor and away you go. Keeps the local shark population healthy, too.

As far as sympathy for the pirates goes, I got none. They know the risks they’re taking, and I’m sure James and karlb, while clearly more advanced than the rest of us Neanderthals, are not quite so enlightened as to offer himself as replacement hostages so the crews of the captured ships can be repatriated to their families.

I think NATO needs to standardize a gallows, mount them to the backs of their ships and start using them. This has been the historical response to pirates, we really only got pirates back once we started excusing their behavior. I am not interested in WHY these people want to steal, murder and threaten lives, I am interested in discouraging the behavior. If SF/Marines have to go onto a ship to get you off and you’re not the crew or owners, you get a short drop, a sudden stop and a free burial at sea.

5.56×45 at long distance sucks as has been demonstrated in Afganistan. I can see having m4’s for close range like in the video, but you would think a .50cal to fire some warning shots at 1000+ yards would be a lot better then letting them get that close and even crash into the side of the ship while opening up with F/A.

I don’t know the range of a RPG but I would want a weapon that can beat its range by 2x or 3x in case they decide to shoot back.

I can hit black at 500 with my civvy M-4 clone, but I’ve never tried it when the target is moving and bobbing up and down.

What would effective range be for the .50 in that scenario? The snipers that took out the pirates with the .50 did it when the pirates were in tow, very close. Even then they were quite concerned about getting immediate hits, due to the bobbing.

At what point is it legal to kill someone just for approaching your boat in their boat? How can we say for sure that they were blood thirsty pirates? Isn’t it a bit like racial profiling to say that skinny black guys in beat up skiffs are always pirates and can be shot on sight? There’s common sense and then there’s the law. I know what common sense says, but what does the law say about this stuff? Maybe they were just out cruising around and wanted to ask the guys on the big ship if they had any Grey Poupon?

Maritime law still calls for requests of permission to approach within _____ feet of a ship on the high seas. (Don’t remember the figure.) At such an approach, after “adequate warning”, hostility may be presumed.

Up arming is not option for the pirates. Their motherships are low profile fishing craft and dhows displacing a few hundred tons at most. Anything larger and they become easy targets for patrolling naval vessels. The pirate boarding parties use inflatable zodiacs which can at best mount a 50 cal/12.7 MG. The average modern merchant displaces more tonnage then an Iowa class BB. The armament options for merships are virtually unlimited. I would recommend the Oto-Melara 76 mm used on FFG-7 class frigates.

Lovely thought. But those Italian jobs cost a pretty penny. I agree that something in the area of a Barret and/or .308 to reach out and touch someone before they get within ak-spray range. But looking at it from their point of view, shooting at a 40,000 dwt freighter going 16knots while riding an inflatable skiff doesn’t sound very productive.

During my last deployment in 2010, we saw a variety of dhows and wooden skiffs used by pirates. We didn’t see any zodiacs or inflateable rafts anywhere. Some of the dhows were good size. The pirates are not concerned with Naval vessels. There is a strict set of criteria and procedures that must followed before a boarding is allowed. The pirates know this. We would follow them for days before permission from leadership was granted. Most of the time it was not granted unless it was believed that vessel had actually comitted an act of piracy.

Even if we boarded and found contriband, they would be detained for a bit. They would eat and sleep better than before. Then transported to land and turned over to one of the local Coast Guards. We would leave and the pirates would be set free. Very few have ever been tried in a court much less convicted of piracy.

You wouldn’t see the Zodiacs because they aren’t going to be boarding you. Most of the attackers I know about have used fast boats operating from dhows and fishing boats. You aren’t going to catch a mership with a mothership.

I’m currently deployed under 5th fleet and am right there with you. Never seen zodiacs but the shui’ dhows can get quite large and may be used as mother ships but the majority of attacks published are perpetrated by multi outboard skiffs. All said and done no matter who you’re up against I’d put NY money on an M-240B and an adequately trained operator any day!