The state government does not seem to expect much from the meeting, Mitra called it “part of a routine”.

“Yes, I will be in Delhi, meeting the Union finance minister on September 6 and 7. But we are not really hoping for a breakthrough this time,” Mitra said.

“There have been at least ten such meetings, if you include the number of times the chief minister or I have met the Prime Minister and the erstwhile finance minister (President Pranab Mukherjee). We are yet to see anything concrete,” he said.

The meeting is in line with what chief minister Mamata Banerjee had announced in the capital on August 23 after meeting Chidambaram over FDI.

Mamata had said the meeting had nothing to do with a financial package for Bengal and that she would send Mitra to meet Chidambaram to discuss the state’s financial situation.

“Parliament is in session. The meetings have to be scheduled according to his (Chidambaram’s) convenience. The timings (of the meetings) are yet to be finalised. But they will take place on September 6 and 7,” Mitra said at Writers’ Buildings.

Mamata echoed Mitra on expectations from the meeting. “It’s part of a routine process…”

According to Union finance ministry officials, Bengal was earlier offered a package of Rs 16,000 crore to be paid in four tranches over three years. The package was to have been in the form of grants for various projects, with most of the money going to backward and border districts.

Bengal’s debt burden is Rs 2.03 lakh crore, a large part of which, the present government says, is because of the previous Left regime.

“What this government wants is a moratorium on interest payouts for three to four years. This will mean a write-off of nearly Rs 20,000 crore annually by the Centre. The Centre is wary because if it somehow manages to meet the demand, it will… pave the way for many more such demands…,” a source said.

Asked if the state would push for the moratorium or settle for the package, Mitra said: “You know well what our main demand is, what we have been asking for since we came to power in the context of the debt burden, which is not our fault. Let’s see.”