Table 1B shows the results of the same 9 tests simulated on a digital computer.

Table 1C shows the same results as of 1B for 9 more tests.

test

nqbits

Shots

QC

Average

variance

Std dev

1

4

100

6.250

6.813

2.610

2

4

1024

6.256

0.301

0.549

3

4

1024

Y

6.250

0.854

0.924

4

4

1024

Y

6.250

3.628

1.905

5

3

100

12.500

8.000

2.828

6

3

1024

12.500

1.498

1.224

7

3

1024

Y

12.513

3.981

1.995

8

3

1024

Y

12.488

2.324

1.524

9

3

1024

Y

12.500

3.025

1.739

Table 1A

test

nqbits

Shots

Average

variance

Std dev

1

4

100

6.250

5.938

2.437

2

4

1024

6.250

0.755

0.869

3

4

1024

6.250

1.284

1.133

4

4

1024

6.250

0.756

0.869

5

3

100

12.500

5.000

2.236

6

3

1024

12.500

1.388

1.178

7

3

1024

12.500

1.879

1.371

8

3

1024

12.500

0.405

0.637

9

3

1024

12.500

2.096

1.448

Table 1B

test

variance

Std dev

1

5.813

2.411

2

0.371

0.609

3

0.726

0.852

4

0.255

0.505

5

11.750

3.428

6

0.472

0.687

7

1.233

1.110

8

1.261

1.123

9

1.199

1.095

Table 1C

Tests 3 and 4 are QC tests done with 4 Hadamard's
The two standard deviation values 0.924 and 1.905 in Table 1A are on average slightly higher than the corresponding values (1.133, 0.869, 0.852 and 0.505) in the tables 1B and 1C. This means that the QC is not performing as expected.

The test 7, 8 and 9 are also performed on a QC, but now with 3 Hadamard's.
Also in this case the standard deviation values are higher for a QC than in the case when a DC is used.