Microsoft Kinect vs. Playstation Move: Which Will Prevail?

Now that some of the dust has settled from this year’s (rather uninspiring) E3, it’s time to step back and think about the prospects for Microsoft Kinect and Playstation Move.

After all, these products are like mini- console launches mid-generation – and that’s not something we’ve seen before (unless you count something like Sega’s 32X0.

So what does the future hold for these two peripherals – other than you waving your arms around like an idiot?

Wii Are Not Threatened

First, it’s important to note that neither Move nor Kinect can, in terms of sheer numbers, pose a real threat to the Wii. The Wii has already sold 70 million units worldwide. In terms of scope and dollars, it’s clear the Wii will remain dominant in the near-term.

But that doesn’t mean that either Move or Natal couldn’t theoretically be more influential for what’s coming next or that ‘hardcore’ gamers might not respond to them more favorably than they have the Wii.

So in some sense, both Move and Kinect are experiments; partial attempts to keep the PS3 and 360 relevant for longer than a normal hardware cycle, while at the same time setting up the Playstation and Xbox brands as being ‘for the whole family’ in the future.

Which One Will Yo Momma Play?

Regardless of any of the rhetoric coming out of Sony or MS, one thing is clear: they, like Nintendo, are looking to broaden the demographic of who plays games. Put another way: it’s all about your mom.

So which of the two will appeal to a more mainstream player? Hands down, Kinect. Yes, the initial games seem little more than Wii evolved – simple, cartoony and best consumed in short spurts – but that’s exactly what the mainstream gamer finds compelling. With Kinect Adventures and Dance Central, Microsoft has the type of game that is far more likely to attract a family crowd – or, for that matter, drunken college students looking for some fun.

On the other hand, while Sony have Move Party and Eyepet, the simple fact that they require the Move controller puts Sony at a disadvantage. After all, the kind of people for whom the Wii was their first video game experience ever have never held a controller, right? In fact, it seems Sony is more intent on appealing to hardcore gamers than the Wii crowd. So…

Advantage with casuals: Microsoft

Hardcore Potential

However, when it comes to traditional action games, there’s just no way around it: Sony looks to be in a better position than Microsoft.

The problem for Microsoft lies in the technical constraints of Natal. The camera technology at the heart of the tech introduces lag into gaming that make it less suited to the frenetic pace of the 360’s key franchises like Halo or Gears of War. Furthermore, Kinect can’t be backported into existing titles.

What we haven’t yet see, however, is how Kinect may be used to provide compelling, secondary functions in games that still mainly use the standard 360 controller. (Sorry folks, walking around a car in Forza doesn’t count.) It might be interesting to see how someone like CliffyB works Kinect into whatever Gears spinoff we spin next.

Move, on the other hand, seems better poised for ‘hardcore’ games, since its relative lack of lag and superior precision allow for its implementation in titles like SOCOM 4 and Killzone 3, which will obviously appeal more to the traditional action-gaming demographic. Furthermore, Move can be backported to older titles, and is in games like Heavy Rain and Resident Evil 5. Based on what we’ve seen so far, Move is of more interest to fans of shooter and action games.

Hardcore advantage: Sony

Media: Overlooked Path to Success?

These days, the HD consoles are clearly used for more than gaming. So you have to wonder: to what extent will Microsoft push Kinect as a new way for people to interact with their media?

See, the thing is, my elderly parents – and less tech-savvy friends – are often baffled by remote controls. If Microsoft could market this as the device that lets you access Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, video and music and other services with a simple swipe of the hand, they could open access to technology in a way that even Apple haven’t been able to yet. The E3 demo certainly looked compelling.

Of course, a potential¬† problem here is that Kinect may not work while sitting down – which would be a giant fly in the proverbial ointment, and render everything I’ve said above null.

As for Move? Sony have demonstrated using the controller to scroll through the XMB, but it’s definitely nowhere near as ‘noob-friendly’ as Kinect. Assuming that Microsoft can work out their issue with sitting vs. standing, it looks like they’ll be better off.

Media Advantage: Microsoft

Marketing Muscle

Yet, despite all the chatter about which gamers think is better, a lot of this will come down to marketing. After all, other than Wii Fit – a product that successfully targeted a pretty specific demographic – few video game peripherals have ever succeeded.

So the question is, who is better suited to sell a message to a mainstream audience? To my mind, Microsoft. This generation, they’ve just been better at crafting a comprehensive message. Whether Xbox Live, Halo or Gears, the folks at Redmond have been more successful at making their platform the one people associate with gaming this generation.

While Sony has now found success and a compelling marketing figure in the Kevin Butler ads, it’s unlikely it’s a campaign that they will be able to extend to a mass market. This means they’ll need to find a new way to sell Move in a new way, and Sony haven’t always been able to nail marketing campaigns off the bat.

So, unless Sony do something really surprising in terms of marketing…

Marketing Advantage: Microsoft

Conclusions?

At the end of the day, if we’re talking about ‘which will prevail’, then this comes down which will sell more. And as to that question… well, if I had to venture a guess, I’d say Microsoft.

Why? With a larger installed base, a better track record of marketing this generation and a line-up more suited to a broader demographic, it seems like Microsoft are more poised to sell more units.

Sony’s Move will have some success – and to be entirely honest as an owner of both systems, it’s the one I’m more personally interested in – but Microsoft just seem better at selling experiences to a mass audience than Sony, and with a head start in the numbers, it seems that MS is the horse to bet on.

Still – what’s clear to anyone concerned with video gaming as more than just entertainment is that neither company has shown much in the way of true innovation. What we’ve gotten is largely rehashes of Wii games. We’ve seen small glimmers of new ideas, such as the above video for Echochrome 2, that uses the PS Move as a flashlight so that players can use the shadows to solve puzzles.

But other than that, this will likely be a marketing game for now, with each company doing their best to push their product on hype for now and hoping that the truly compelling titles are ready for 2011.

Nonetheless, anything that expands gaming to more people is a good thing. Let’s just hope that neither Microsoft, Nintendo nor Sony are content to rest on their laurels and give us something truly groundbreaking and revolutionary in the way of games soon.

Microsoft has the greater potential for success but if they both fail, Microsoft has put more into it than Sony and will have to take more of a hit. It sounds like Kinect will be sold at a loss too so all the more pressure is on Microsoft to succeed.

Your point about the Wii not being threatened is the most important. It’s still the casual king and I don’t think either system will make much of a dent overall. Microsoft has such a mountain ahead of them in changing the perception of the Xbox 360 as the hardcore gaming machine and Sony just won’t be able to market Move well enough – even with the Coca-Cola cross promotion.

In the end, I hope they’re both successfull enough to hold off the next real generation of systems but not so successful that motion controls will end up in all MY games. Keep that crap out of the Fables, Halos, Uncharteds and inFamouses.

Kinect is better than move in so many ways. Even though move had shooter games, i’m sure kinect will have them too. You are the controller. Fighting games will teach you how to fight. Shooter games will teach you or give you a head start in training if you want to be in the military.

#3

luis

December 28th, 2010 at 1:55 pm

Your right if you are athletic or the kind of person that works out and have fun at the same time go with the kinetic.Up to know the only thing that we have seen for the kinetic is sport game and fighting game which involve movement.Looking at the the way the kinect functions there provably wont be any shooting games on the future. As you can see there no way the camera can track your finger they only track your body so in other words the camera sees you as a stick figure not a high detail painting.

#4

andrew

June 30th, 2010 at 4:21 pm

every point brought up is a very good one

As potential for hardcore gaming comes it looks like Sony has the upper hand on that for now. however that is for now…give Microsoft a chance they could shock us all

However I still would prefer to use a controller for hardcore shooter games cause there is so much involved in shooter games that standing there without a gun in my hand won’t feel right to me(because I am a gun owner).

also I disagree on one point about that Nintendo should be scared because they are still stuck on the controller world and Microsoft took away the control. I had played a Wii the other day for the first time and played the wii bowling game, the only problem I had with that was I was all excited about being involved with the game and I was standing up going through the motions and all. My friend was sitting on the couch playing with just the controller because the wii is still controller base so you could fool their motion sensor.

At the E3 conference if you saw the brief interview(G4 interview) with actor Billy Crystal, City Slickers, he commented about how the kinect is controller free, because he said he likes video games however he is more caught up with what buttons he has to push. good news billy the kinect is controller free you see the controller. So as Microsoft says, “Jump in”

Also for a game to be released at the beginning of next year is a Star Wars game for the kinect, which puts you as the jedi which will gain a huge fan base, it is star wars every will be playing old(that grew up with episode IV, V, VI, then young will play because of episode I, II, III, so that Ga.e alone will bridge the age gap, youtube search Star Wars Kinect, come on everyone wants to fight Darth Vader

You may think I am wrong however Microsoft has been known to make a great product and make it better, nd they have done something that neither the Nintendo nor Sony has done, Microsoft made a controller free device, wait we are the controller

I am so tired of reading articles that question your ability to sit down while usinge the Kinect. Come on people lets be real,If your are able to control the apps with hand swipes and voice controls why is it so hard to believe that you wouldn’t be able to do that sitting down. Who spends millions of dollars developing a 3-D mapping system that can track dance moves, excersie routines, and game movements but as soon as you sit down it looses you!!!! Why would they do that?

#7

jdigitalseven

July 21st, 2010 at 8:15 am

I love how bias this article is. Bluetooth technology has no equal and is why the Move will be a decent success, probably not overthrowing the Wii, but still decent. MS’s Kinetic has yet to be proven to be reliable at all, and has been said to be mandatory to have many lights on. Its suppose to have trouble picking up people w/darker skin as well. I dont know why anybody would drop $150 on something that has barely been shown in a live demo….The move was successfully shown to work from even early models last year.

#8

jdigitalseven

July 21st, 2010 at 8:22 am

LOL @ all the sheep putting faith in an overly unproved camera from MS. The voice command menu thing is really cool, but other than that Kinetic just hasnt been proven. Sony/Nintendo aren’t afraid to prove their tech…yet MS has been very shady proving Kinetic…probably because just like the 360 release they just want people to buy it and worry about problems later. There will probably have to be a 3-5 year warranty in a couple years just like they had to do with the console.