News

Culling The Herd
by Sheila SamplesIn 1974, a year after orchestrating a mass terror bombing of Cambodia -- after being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize -- Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and his National Security Council completed â€œNational Security Study Memo 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.â€

This document, whose sharp edges are dulled by page after leaden page of how to reduce over-population in the Third World through birth control and "other" population-reduction programs, was classified until 1989, but was almost immediately accepted as US policy, and remains the US blueprint for ethnic cleansing today.

"Everything you can imagine is real"

- Pablo Picasso

It is difficult to imagine the staggering number of innocent
humans who have perished through war or famine as a direct result of
Kissinger's half-century obsession with, and lust for, genocide. It's
even more difficult to imagine the cruel indifference with which
Kissinger, and those like him in positions of political and corporate
power -- the elite -- continue to plan the elimination of millions,
even billions. All under the guise of national security, or to spread
freedom...democracy...

Kissinger targeted a number of "key
countries" whose populations, he said, must be curtailed and controlled
lest they gain economic, political and military strength, and thus
threaten US strategic interests. "Depopulation should be the highest
priority of foreign policy towards the third world," Kissinger said,
"because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of
minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries.â€

Then,
as now, any nation refusing to surrender its natural resources was an
ominous threat to our national security and was dealt with initially
through birth control and other population- reduction programs such as
food rationing.

But that was too slow for Kissinger, for Brent
Scowcroft who replaced Kissinger as national security adviser and was
put in charge of thinning out the Third World population, and for his
eager enabler, CIA Director George Bush who trotted like a love-starved
puppy at Kissinger's heels for decades.

At first, they used
food as "an instrument of national power" to coerce the dumb masses to
stop copulating and populating, and then as a deadly weapon because
widespread famine not only dealt death quicker, but it was
cost-effective. And it made more sense.

Like Kissinger said, "To give
food aid to a country just because they (sic) are starving is a pretty
weak reason."

If we could imagine the suffering endured by
victims of such perverse inhumanity, we might feel a twinge of outrage
or, as George Washington so succinctly put it -- a "little spark of
celestial fire called conscience." Or not. Perhaps we are so far
removed from reality because our minds cannot grasp the horror of that
reality. Those who seek to destroy the denizens of this planet are
totally without compassion or remorse. They are grotesque mutants who
kill indiscriminately in their relentless drive for world conquest and
domination.

It's naive to think the carnage will stop once
predators such as Kissinger, Alexander Haig, Robert McNamara, George
H.W. Bush, and other One World advocates, many of whom are in their 80s
or 90s, are no longer in our midst. With the release of thousands of
tons of Depleted Uranium in both Bush Gulf Wars and Afghanistan, they
have poisoned food, water and air, and turned the entire region into
massive radioactive death camps. Without fear of accountability, they
have ensured the slow, agonizing extermination of entire populations,
to include the American military, whom Kissinger views as "dumb, stupid
animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy" -- and their families
-- that will continue for many generations.

We're like herds of
cattle, grazing placidly, unable or unwilling to imagine that we might
share the same fate as the millions throughout the Third World targeted
by the elite as "bottom feeders," contributing nothing -- eating into
their profit -- gluttons who must be dispensed with.

Any rancher or
farmer will tell you that it's good business to cull the herd for a
variety of reasons, such as market outlook, cash flow, or just to
maintain a healthier, more easily controlled mass of cattle. It makes
no sense to keep problem cows, the elderly, the ill or non-productive
around. There comes a time when you must cut your losses -- and cull
the herd.

There are those who, unlike Kissinger and his
co-conspirators, are not interested in profit or power, but believe
fervently that human population is destroying the planet. Perhaps the
most outspoken is University of Texas evolutionary scientist Dr. Eric
R. Pianka, who gave a speech in March 2006 advocating the elimination
of 90 percent of Earth's population.

According to Forrest M.
Mims III, Chairman of the Environmental Science Section of the Texas
Academy of Science, and the editor of The Citizen Scientist, Pianka
shrugged aside war and famine -- too slow -- and said "the most
efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die" is
disease. Pianka advocates airborne Ebola because, he explained, "it is
highly lethal, and it kills in days, instead of years."

Pianka
drew rounds of enthusiastic applause throughout his speech, and a
standing ovation when he threw in the Bird Flu for good measure, and
quipped gleefully, "We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth."

Five
hours later, the University presented Pianka with a plaque, not for
winning hands down as "Mad Scientist of the Year," but in recognition
of his being named 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.

It
doesn't take a wild imagination to know that genocide is real, and it's
underway in America. The most blatant example is the barbaric response
to Hurricane Katrina victims -- withholding food, blocking aid,
ignoring those clinging to rooftops while crying out in vain for help,
leaving corpses to float in the flooded streets or to rot in the
Superdome.

If you start with the poor, minorities, elderly, the
ill or non-productive, the culling becomes much easier the next time
around. Those who wait become inured to the inhumanity and, rather than
rise up against it, breathe sighs of relief that it's others and not
them who are rounded up and herded to the slaughterhouse.

Imagine
what life would be like if the Food and Drug Administration did not
ensure the safety of our food chain...if our creeks and rivers were
polluted by sewage and industrial waste...if vaccines forced on our
children caused mental deficiencies, even death...if mothers were
afraid to breast-feed their babies because the environmental toxin
perchlorate present in our food and water supply accumulates in
mother's milk...if our air was contaminated...if we had a government
cold-hearted enough to withhold food and aid from the needy and health
care from poor children...if we were spied upon and incarcerated,
tortured, disappeared without charges...

Oh yeah. I forgot. That
is what our life is like. All that, and more, is grinding relentlessly
away at our safety, our health and our lives.

The culling must stop, even if we are forced to stampede. They must be impeached. Go here, here, and here and take action.

Sheila
Samples is an Oklahoma writer and a former civilian US Army Public
Information Officer. She is a regular contributor for a variety of
Internet sites. Contact her at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.