Available Case Documents

Order granting in part denying in part 135 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Mazda Motor Corp. All claims against Ford Motor Company are dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Ford as a party defendant. The 138 MOTION to Preclude Certain Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert, Troy Cottles is moot. The 149 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Summary Judgment Affidavit is granted & portions of the affidavit are stricken as set out. The 156 MOTION to Strike the 155 Notice of Filing Supplemental Authority is granted. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 4/3/2013. (tgw)

ORDER granting 133 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by defendant Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC as further set out. Count II of the Amended Complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff's claims against this defendant will proceed to trial with respect to Counts I and III. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 2/8/2013. (jlr)

Order re: 48 MOTION to Dismiss for insufficient process and insufficient service of process filed by Mazda Motor Corp. The motion is granted insofar as service was defective and is due to be quashed, but is denied as to the dismissal of plaintiff& #039;s claims for insufficient service. Plaintiff's purported service of process on Mazda Motor Corporation via its American subsidiary is quashed. Plaintiff is ordered to file monthly status reports re: service on Mazda Motor Corp. on the fourth Tuesday of each month, beginning in August 2011. First status report due by 8/23/2011. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/15/2011. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.