The US Supreme Court (with the backing of the corporate lap dogs in Congress) have decided that corporations have the same rights as individuals.

Some of the further-to-the-right posters on this forum have stated that there should be "no infringement" whatsoever upon individuals' right to bear arms.

Given that arms certainly don't stop with assault rifles, wouldn't that line of logic support the concept of corporations mounting their own armies? Then "Stand Your Ground" could be taken to a whole new extreme.

But again, if the "people's right to bear arms shall not be infringed" means no limits (ever) and Citizens United means that corporations are people, then what's to stop corporations from mounting their own "personal" armies?

After all, it's all in the interest of free enterprise. The arms manufacturers would LOVE it. Their market opens up exponentially. They're not left selling only to a handful of superpowers, second-rate dictators and rebel factions anymore.

And come on, if you've got an assault rifle, you KNOW you want a shoulder-to-air missile.

But again, if the "people's right to bear arms shall not be infringed" means no limits (ever) and Citizens United means that corporations are people, then what's to stop corporations from mounting their own "personal" armies?

After all, it's all in the interest of free enterprise. The arms manufacturers would LOVE it. Their market opens up exponentially. They're not left selling only to a handful of superpowers, second-rate dictators and rebel factions anymore.

And come on, if you've got an assault rifle, you KNOW you want a shoulder-to-air missile.

I'm convinced you are nothing but a troll and a poor one at that. Nice dodge around saying private corporations are the ones supplying the military might to this nations Military. But you knew that already

You also know more about the ramifications of the judgement the SCOTUS in the Heller case. But you like to fire for effect, as it were, in order to get a rise out of people. You even us insults on folk, like myself, that have not disrespected you in the least. By the way, ghat can change and may if you continue.

And being a truly informed of the Heller case you also know that the SCOTUS in it ruling preserved the right to place restrictions on individuals when connected to the ownership of firearms.

But you knew that and now we all know that you did. Of course. Now please pla nicely in future conversations and play fair or you might just find yourself ....... Well, let's leave it like that for now.

In other words, for your simplistic understanding fake as it is, stop trolling.