We have had badges without the Castle before so it does make sense to drop it but there is indeed history there. For those who haven't seen images, have a look at some of the work by Del Deacon on Twitter. He has managed to propose images which look like the new badge but have a feint version of the castle - almost 'ghost' like as a nod to the past - personally like that.

As for Leeds .. awful badge - off the scale !! .. well done to fans for protest

If we stayed at the LS for a hundred years and it becomes something everyone thought was a cherished part of our history, there would be a case for incorporating it into the crest.

The main thing is, the crossed hammers represent our origin and should remain even if we are no longer iron working shipbuilders, and as the castle represents the Boleyn Ground, which was our home for just about all our history, it justifies being in our crest, even if we no longer play there.

"They removed the castle as it represented the Boleyn and we aren't there anymore so fans realised it made sense."

You say that, but by the same logic, we are no longer iron working shipbuilders either, so the crossed hammers are no longer relevant.

In other words, the ironworks are a massive part of our history we all want to hold onto, and I can't see a good reason not to apply the same sentiment to the castle, which represents the BG, which is also a massive part of our hsitory.