The bill weakens protection for minorities and women, Rev. Rodney Williams said, by making it harder to prove discrimination is the cause of an employer’s disciplinary behavior.

If signed by the Governor, the law would require plaintiffs to prove claims of discrimination are “the motivating factor” in an action by an employer. Existing law says the plaintiff has only to prove discrimination was “a contributing factor.”

Williams says the passage of SB 43 would “protect discrimination and foster a new era of Jim Crow in the state of Missouri.”

“This deadly bill has the potential to create a hostile work environment, especially for people of color, Muslims and women," he says.

Attorney Paul Bullman says SB 43 demands discrimination cases meet the “determinative influence” standard, making them exceedingly hard to prove. He says the new law would disproportionately hurt the most vulnerable who are least able to weather a job loss.

“Most folks who get discriminated against are not the ones making six figures who can hire a great attorney or who can pay for three years of litigation,” Bullman says.

The sponsor of SB 43, Farmington Republican Sen. Gary Romine, says the bill would protect businesses from frivolous lawsuits and provide a more hospitable business climate in the state.

Romine owns a rental housing company in Southwest Missouri, Show-Me Rent-to-Own. The business is currently being sued for race discrimination.

In court documents, the plaintiff claims a manager at Romine’s business referred to him on number of occasions by a hostile racial epithet and made derogatory comments about working with and renting to African Americans.

The plaintiff in the case was later fired, allegedly for using profanity, although white employees “routinely use profanity in defendant’s workplace and are not disciplined.”

“There is nothing more corrupt than someone getting elected to go to Jeff City to sponsor a bill that would directly benefit himself,” Bullman says. “That’s the definition of corruption.”

Repeated attempts to reach Sen. Romine were unsuccessful.

Local NAACP representatives today recollected Governor Greitens’ campaign promise to guarantee there is “no discrimination in the state of Missouri.” In an October 2016 Associated Press Q&A with gubernatorial candidates Eric Greitens and Chris Koster, Greitens said “I believe in non-discrimination. I believe that we need to protect everyone’s rights."

The comments were made in response to a question about sexual orientation and gender identity, but the now-Governor went on to say "my commitment is to protect the religious freedoms of all Missourians while also making sure that we practice non-discrimination."

Laura Ziegler is a community engagement reporter and producer for KCUR 89.3. You can reach her on Twitter @laurazig or email lauraz@kcur.org.

Related Content

Kansas City is the largest city in Missouri. But sometimes, it feels like its interests aren't at the forefront of the discussion in Jefferson City. Two former Missouri legislators turned Kansas City council members talk about how the city's priorities fared during the 2017 session and what's on their agenda for the future.

Updated 7:45 p.m. May 22 with number of bills filed Monday – On the eve of his first legislative special session, Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens and his allied nonprofit group are attacking one of the pivotal legislators needed to win approval of the governor’s favored bill.

The nonprofit group is called A New Missouri and can collect unlimited donations from unidentified donors. It is targeting state Sen. Doug Libla, a Republican whose southeast Missouri district includes the now-closed aluminum smelting plant that Greitens hopes to reopen, along with a possible steel mill.

Libla says he supports the projects. But the senator questions some provisions in the expected special-session bill that he says could reduce state oversight over Ameren, which provides electricity to much of eastern Missouri.

Missouri Republicans had a lot to be optimistic about when the General Assembly convened in January. For the first time nearly a decade, the GOP held the reins of power in the executive and legislative branches — giving the party a prime chance to pass longstanding policy initiatives.

That optimism turned out to be warranted, especially when it came to overhauling the state’s labor and legal climate. But the process was anything but smooth.