On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:57:16PM +0000, James Blessing wrote:
> On 12 November 2010 12:47, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote:
> > You can find the full proposal at:
> >
> > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-10.html> >
> > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> > <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> before 10 December 2010.
>> Initial thoughts...
>> So what happens to 'orphaned' resources? Are RIPE NCC the 'sponsoring'
> LIR in this circumstance?
If you think in terms of business logic, then answer is: the same as
right now. If you think in terms of db logic, then answer is: special
object.
> Does the NCC have the resources to deal with the increased level of
> avuse complaints that may be targeted at them with this change?
In my opinion, there will be no problem. Orphaned resource is temporary
situation.
> Who would be responsible for maintaining the relationship, the
> sponsoring LIR or the End user? Does this have an implication for mnt
> objects?
LIR. But to be honest - proposed new prototypes would make this easier,
and move this responsibility to automatic robot.
Piotr
--
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl

The RIPE NCC uses cookies. Some of these cookies may have been set already. More information about our cookies can be found in our privacypolicy. You can accept our cookies either by clicking here or by continuing to use the site.