Yes, completely and utterly. There's no denying that they're both talented, but Adele's voice and music in particular leaves me completely cold. That, coupled with the press putting her across as someone who can do no wrong and is 'above' everyone else because they think she is 'private', gets on my nerves a bit. I call her 'Saint Adele'.

I don't mind Emili Sande's music too much(I find it more diverse and catchy then Adele's), but overexposed isn't the word. There has been no avoiding her over the last year.

Yes, completely and utterly. There's no denying that they're both talented, but Adele's voice and music in particular leaves me completely cold. That, coupled with the press putting her across as someone who can do no wrong and is 'above' everyone else because they think she is 'private', gets on my nerves a bit. I call her 'Saint Adele'.

I don't mind Emili Sande's music too much(I find it more diverse and catchy then Adele's), but overexposed isn't the word. There has been no avoiding her over the last year.

Haters gonna hate

what is wrong with people these days? Can't they be happy for people achieving success.
How is it her fault if she is nominated for things, is all over the papers when she claims these awards etc...? How does she think she is above everyone?
There is no way you can call Adele a media w**e, in the same way like the Kardashians are.

what is wrong with people these days? Can't they be happy for people achieving success.
How is it her fault if she is nominated for things, is all over the papers when she claims these awards etc...? How does she think she is above everyone?
There is no way you can call Adele a media w**e, in the same way like the Kardashians are.

I didn't say she thinks she's above everyone, and I don't think she's a media **** like the Kardashians. I just think she's a normal person with talent, but people(especially the media) act like she's some perfect god-like person on a sky-high pedestal.

In my opinion the difference between the two is that Adele was 'overexposed' in 2011 because the demand for it was well and truly there. At least it was natural progression.

Emeli on the other hand.... yes, she is talented. And yes she has been successful, but not at the insane levels Adele has reached. It's like she is being pushed down our throats as 'the next Adele'. It's all so forced. And her music isn't as good either imo.

In my opinion the difference between the two is that Adele was 'overexposed' in 2011 because the demand for it was well and truly there. At least it was natural progression.

Emeli on the other hand.... yes, she is talented. And yes she has been successful, but not at the insane levels Adele has reached. It's like she is being pushed down our throats as 'the next Adele'. It's all so forced. And her music isn't as good either imo.

The Olympics closing ceremony was the highlight of the forcing. She was out of tune ther and most people didn't know who she was.

They are both talented but their music is played to death so I tend to avoid them as best as I can.

I agree, for me its a case of familiarity breeds contempt. I like both but they are far too overplayed. I think it's the lack if new material, particularly in Adeles case. Nothing against either of them but there is only so many times you can hear the same songs over and over again before you get sick of them.