The home of real patriotic British people.
The independent nationalist voice in the UK.
The Red Rose County - Lancashire.
A cummerbund & Griffinite free zone.A blog that supported John Tyndall.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Disabled and elderly campaigners protesting removal of travel concessions ‘kettled by the police’ at Sheffield railway station

Two pensioners arrested and blind woman hospitalised after 'Freedom Rides' demo was broken up

Two pensioners were arrested when violent scuffles broke out at
Sheffield railway station following the latest in a series of so-called
Freedom Rides – named after the US civil rights actions – organised to
highlight changes to the system of free rail travel in South Yorkshire.

Disabled and elderly campaigners have vowed to continue
their protests against the removal of travel concessions after claiming
they were victims of “thuggish” behaviour by police and security staff
during Monday’s demonstration against the cuts.
Protesters – including a blind woman who was taken to
hospital after being injured when she fell over a wheelchair – said they
suffered cuts and bruises as a result of being “manhandled” in clashes
with British Transport Police and members of Northern Rail’s rail
response team.

Another man collapsed and was taken to hospital while a
70-year-old protester was nearly knocked on to the tracks during the
melee.
A number of station staff were also said to have been hurt
during the incident on Monday in which they claimed to have been
physically and verbally abused by elderly and disabled demonstrators.
Tony Nuttall, 65, of the Barnsley Retirees Action Group who
was arrested in the fracas, said campaigners would not stop until
concessionary travel was reintroduced under the old terms.
Mr Nuttall described how he was arrested and charged with
obstructing a police officer as the group of 45 protesters were
“kettled” while staging an impromptu rally on the platform at Sheffield
station after boarding a train from Barnsley and deliberately
over-riding their stop.
“This sort of thuggish behaviour is not acceptable,
especially when used against older and disabled people who cannot defend
themselves,” he said. “It was a cowardly attack.
“I was trying to link arms with people and five officers
grabbed hold of me from behind and forced my head down. They marched me
back and forth with my head bowed down and put me on the floor. I was
handcuffed and taken to a police station.
“It was a peaceful protest by people who are hardly likely
to use violence against blokes who look like they have been brought in
from the local nightclub,” Mr Nuttall said.Police and Northern Rail security staff were involved in scuffles with about 45 protesters
“The fight goes on. We are determined and we think we are in the right.”
Jen Dunstan, of Sheffield Disabled People Against the Cuts,
said: “Dozens of elderly and disabled people have been left with
bruising.”
The old rail concessionary scheme was axed as part of
measures to reduce a £243,000 shortfall in the budget of South Yorkshire
Integrated Transport Authority.
Mr Nuttall will appear at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court on
Monday alongside George Arthur, 65, who is accused of obstructing a
police officer and fare evasion.
A spokeswoman for Northern Rail said it was investigating the incident.http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/disabled-and-elderly-campaigners-protesting-removal-of-travel-concessions-kettled-by-the-police-at-sheffield-railway-station-9560606.html

NWN: At last some people are fighting the austerity cuts!The bloke in the unusual hold by that mob of Police is an OAP apparently. Disgraceful acts by the Police.

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Gary Oldman
has blasted Hollywood for what he perceives as a double standard —
asserting that Bill Maher and Jon Stewart can get away with politically
incorrect humor while others like Mel Gibson and Alec Baldwin cannot.
The profanity-laced statements are included in an interview with the July-August issue of Playboy.
The most explosive part of the interview includes attacks on Maher,
Stewart and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, following his
declaration that political correctness is “crap.”
“Well, if I called Nancy Pelosi a c*** — and I’ll go one better, a
f****** useless c*** — I can’t really say that. But Bill Maher and Jon
Stewart can, and nobody’s going to stop them from working because of it.
Bill Maher could call someone a fag and get away with it. He said to
Seth MacFarlane this year, ‘I thought you were going to do the Oscars
again. Instead they got a lesbian.’ He can say something like that. Is
that more or less offensive than Alec Baldwin saying to someone in the
street, ‘You fag’? I don’t get it.”
Oldman, star of such films as “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” and the “Dark
Knight” trilogy, also asserted that the culture in Hollywood during the
past awards season was such that “if you didn’t vote for ’12 Years a
Slave,’ you were a racist. You have to be very careful about what you
say.”
He also expressed sympathy for Gibson, who declared in 2006 while
being arrested that “Jews are responsible for all the wars in the
world.”
Gibson later apologized for the remarks.
“Mel Gibson is in a town that’s run by Jews, and he said the wrong
thing because he’s actually bitten the hand that I guess has fed him –
and doesn’t need to feed him anymore because he’s got enough dough,”
Oldman said. “He’s like an outcast, a leper, you know?”
“I don’t know about Mel. He got drunk and said a few things, but
we’ve all said those things,” the actor told Playboy during the
interview, which began with a discussion of Oldman’s role in “Dawn of
Planet of the Apes.”
“We’re all f****** hypocrites,” he added. “That’s what I think about
it. The policeman who arrested him has never used the word n***** or
that f****** Jew?”
“I’m being brutally honest here,” Oldman said. “It’s the hypocrisy of it that drives me crazy.”
Oldman also defended Baldwin’s use of homophobic language: “Alec
calling someone an F-A-G in the street while he’s pissed off coming out
of his building because they won’t leave him alone. I don’t blame him.
So they persecute.”http://variety.com/2014/film/news/gary-oldman-blasts-liberal-hollywood-defends-mel-gibson-and-alec-baldwin-1201243936/

A man who says he was recruited and sent by a covert police
unit to infiltrate the British National party has spent more than a
decade trying to persuade police to publicly clear his name of racism.
Gary Shopland, 51, says he has been unfairly branded a racist because he was persuaded to spend seven years as a BNP member, during which time he helped to protect the party's leader, Nick Griffin, and became one of its regional treasurers.
He says he had no involvement with the BNP before he was recruited by police to act as their mole within the party.
An
evaluation by a psychiatrist concluded that the refusal by the police
to make an unequivocal public declaration that Shopland worked for them
had caused him "considerable and unremitting" damage. It has left him
suffering from chronic stress, suicidal bouts, mood swings, a sense of
hopelessness, weight gain and sleeping problems.
The psychiatrist
said the refusal had also hindered Shopland's attempts to find a job. He
says he has been unemployed and living on disability benefits since
2007.
West Yorkshire police say that a national policy prevents them from confirming or denying
whether they recruited Shopland to work as an informant. However, his
campaign has forced police to make what appears to be a partial
admission.
The force's most senior lawyer told him in a letter
that allegations that he was a "racist and/or Nazi" were "totally
inaccurate and without foundation", but provided no further explanation.
A
senior source within the force has said unofficially that he was an
informant tasked by the police. Another source, asked how the police
could say Shopland was not a racist if they had never had any contact
with him, said: "You have got to read between the lines in that letter."
A former officer said to be involved in supervising Shopland referred questions to West Yorkshire police.
Shopland's
reward for working as an informer within the BNP averaged around £30 or
£40 a week, Shopland says. He alleges that the police in effect
"drafted him off the street to do their dirty work and then befriended
and betrayed" him.
The police's reputation has been damaged by a series of revelations about the undercover infiltration of political groups. The disclosures have led the home secretary, Theresa May, to order a public inquiry into undercover policing.
On
Tuesday, police chiefs are due to make public details of how they have
responded to the damning verdict of an independent inquiry by Mark
Ellison QC, who concluded in March that Scotland Yard had spied on the family of the murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence.
Mick Creedon, the Derbyshire chief constable called in by the Met to conduct an internal inquiry into the conduct of the undercover police unit that infiltrated political groups for four decades, is also due to publish a report.
The
latest allegations relating to the police's handling of spies centre on
Shopland, who was working as a part-time as a nightclub bouncer when he
says he was approached in 1996 to become an informer. An endurance
runner, he had been training in the mountains of Snowdonia with a friend
who was a West Yorkshire police officer. A group of officers met
Shopland in a car park and asked if he would like to work for the
police. Shopland claims he was asked to write to the BNP and become a member so that he could feed back to the police inside information about their activities.
Shopland
says he had never heard of the BNP before then, although he was aware
that another racist party, the National Front, "went around kicking
people's heads in".
One of his handlers told him that he "looked
the part". The handler, who said he worked for a unit monitoring
rightwing political groups, told him: "Someone like you only comes
around every 20 years, someone willing to stick their neck on the line,"
and that "if I was half as good as it says on my CV then I would do
really well".
Shopland says he was thrilled to be asked to help
the police and dedicated himself not only to being the best informant
but also to training himself to behave like a racist. He rose to be
appointed the treasurer of the BNP's Yorkshire region and one of Griffin's
bodyguards. Throughout his seven years in the party, he says, he was
regularly passing on information about the BNP's activities to his
handlers. This included details of meetings such as the names of those
in attendance, personal information about individuals such as their jobs
and vehicle number plates, and warnings about who might be planning
violent acts such as fire-bombings.
Payment, always in cash,
depended on how useful his handlers believed his information to be, he
says. Some weeks he was paid nothing, other times they would wind up him
up by waving the cash in front of him and then snatching it away from
him, according to Shopland.
He says he grew disillusioned as his
handlers failed to support or value him properly. He decided to quit
after he was named as a BNP member in the media, including the Observer. He was angered by his handlers' failure to do anything about his public exposure.
He
says his BNP membership caused problems with family and friends. He
says that his handlers tried to persuade him not to leave, then
suggested he go and infiltrate loyalist groups in Northern Ireland or
"start growing a beard and convert to Islam".
"It was a long
process. They said the BNP won't just let you go, what about going to
join the loyalists over the water, can you do the Muslim thing? They
didn't want to let me go."
Since quitting in 2003, Shopland has
been seeking from West Yorkshire police a public and unambiguous
declaration that he worked for them as an informer, as he has no written
evidence of his clandestine work. He says he has spent £25,000 on
lawyers in his quest, including funding the evaluation by the
psychiatrist.
The most compelling concession he has won came in
2008 when Mike Percival, the force solicitor for West Yorkshire police,
wrote to Shopland's then lawyers: "The West Yorkshire police are aware
of historic media reports suggesting that your client (Gary Shopland) is
a racist and/or Nazi. These reports were totally inaccurate and without
proper foundation."
In a statement, Assistant Chief Constable Ingrid Lee
said: "The question of whether someone is or is not a police informant
is one that the police service is often asked. Many methods are used to
obtain intelligence and that intelligence is vital to keeping our
communities safe.
"There exists strict governance and guidelines
in relation to all intelligence-gathering techniques, many of which are
subject to frequent and independent inspection. It is, however, the
position of West Yorkshire police, and the police and other law
enforcement agencies nationally, neither to confirm nor deny whether
people are, are not or ever have been informants."Shopland's psychiatric
evaluation paints a picture of a man who will continue to suffer
"prolonged" problems until police clear his name. The psychiatrist said
he was "a man of pride" who felt he had been "abused and violated".
Shopland,
who has worked in the security industry, fears that he would be
humiliated if he tries seek a job because his employers would discover
his past membership of the BNP.
A spokesman for the BNP said the
claim that the police had infiltrated the organisation was more serious
than historic allegations of wrongdoing by BNP supporters.
"The more serious thing is the fact that we have the police involving themselves in disrupting legitimate political parties."http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/jun/23/bnp-infiltrator-police-covert-spy

Friday, June 20, 2014

Secret trade agreement covering 68 percent of world services published by WikiLeaks

The text of a 19-page, international trade agreement
being drafted in secret was published by WikiLeaks on Thursday as the
transparency group’s editor commemorated his two-year anniversary
confined to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
Fifty countries around the globe have already signed on to the
Trade in Service Agreement, or TISA, including the United States,
Australia and the European Union. Despite vast international
ties, however, details about the deal have been negotiated behind
closed-doors and largely ignored by the press.
In a statement published by the group alongside the
leaked draft this week, WikiLeaks said “proponents of TISA
aim to further deregulate global financial services
markets,” and have participated in “a significant
anti-transparency manoeuvre” by working secretly on a deal
that covers more than 68 percent of world trade in services,
according to the Swiss National Center for Competence in
Research.
Touting the deal earlier this year, the United States Chamber of
Commerce said a successful TISA agreement would
benefit America’s services industry and its 96 million, or 84
percent, of the nation’s private sector workers. “As its
chief goals, the TISA should expand access to foreign markets for
US service industries and ensure they receive national and
most-favored nation treatment,” the chamber said of the deal
in February. “It should also lift foreign governments’
sectoral limits on investment in services," “eliminate regulatory
inconsistencies that at times loom as trade barriers” and
“prohibit restrictions on legitimate cross‐border information
flows and bar local infrastructure mandates relating to data
storage.”
WikiLeaks warns that this largely important trade deal has been
hardly discussed in public, however, notwithstanding evidence
showing that the policy makers involved want to establish rules
that would pertain to services used by billions worldwide.
“The draft Financial Services Annex sets rules which would
assist the expansion of financial multi-nationals – mainly
headquartered in New York, London, Paris and Frankfurt – into
other nations by preventing regulatory barriers,” WikiLeaks
said in a statement. “The leaked draft also shows that the US
is particularly keen on boosting cross-border data flow, which
would allow uninhibited exchange of personal and financial
data.”
Additionally, the current draft also includes language inferring
that, upon the finishing of negotiations, the document will be
kept classified for five full years.
In Australia, journalists at The Age reported that experts say the
proposed changes included within the WikiLeaks document
“could undermine Australia's capacity to independently
respond to and weather any future global financial crisis.”
Dr. Patricia Ranald, a research associate at the University of
Sydney and convener of the Australian Fair Trade and Investment
Network, told the paper that the documents suggest the US wants
to “tie the hands” of other governments, including
allied ones, by way of sheer deregulation.
“Amendments from the US are seeking to end publicly provided
services like public pension funds, which are referred to as
'monopolies' and to limit public regulation of all financial
services,” she said. ''They want to freeze financial
regulation at existing levels, which would mean that governments
could not respond to new developments like another global
financial crisis.''
Earlier this week, US Trade Representative Michael Froman said
the TISA deal was already well on its way to being put together.
"The basic framework of the agreement is in place, initial
market access offers have been exchanged, and sector-specific
work in areas like telecommunications andfinancialservices is in
full swing,” Froman said, according to Reuters.
The document published this week by WikiLeaks is dated April 14 —
two months before Froman last weighed in on the progress of the
negotiations and six months after his office hailed previous re-write to the proposal.
Along with representatives from Canada, Israel, Mexico, New
Zealand, Turkey and dozens others, American policy makers will
met in Geneva, Switzerland later this month starting June 23 to
begin the next round of negotiations.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, meanwhile, remains confined to
Ecuador’s embassy in London where two years ago this Thursday he
arrived seeking asylum. Assange, 42, is wanted for questioning in
Sweden but fears his arrival there would prompt a swift
extradition to the US due to his role in exposing American state
secrets.http://rt.com/usa/167088-wikileaks-tisa-secret-trade/

On Thursday 5 June and Friday 6 June 2014, the main issues in a case
against the Metropolitan Police over undercover relationships will be
laid out for the first time in open court. The High Court will hear an
application to require the Metropolitan police to drop their “neither
confirm nor deny” (NCND) stance. NCND has been one of many delaying
tactics used by the Met to maintain secrecy over the legal action
against them, despite the very serious allegations that have been made
by the Claimants.
Eight women are bringing common law claims of assault, deceit,
negligence and misfeasance in public office; this hearing concerns five
of the women. The officers’ deployments were part of the Special
Demonstration Squad (SDS), which was infiltrating environmental and
social justice campaign groups. Several officers entered into long-term
relationships, causing lasting disruption and psychological damage.
Despite widespread public outcry over what appears to be a systematic
pattern of abuse, the Metropolitan Police have not entered a defence
against the claims, instead resorting to a series of delaying tactics
and bids for secrecy, including their so-called Neither Confirm Nor Deny
“policy” (NCND). The Met police withdrew their application to strike
out the Claimants’ claims last March after the Home Secretary announced a
public inquiry.
Harriet Wistrich, solicitor for the eight women said: “This will be
the first hearing in open court when the main issues will be set out in
the case against the Metropolitan police over the deployments of SDS
officers. We will be providing detailed evidence of what the Claimants
have discovered and what is already now known about the four undercover
officers in the case which undermines the MPS’ reliance on NCND. NCND
appears to be a smokescreen to cover up the extent of wrong-doing, and
should not be permitted.”
For press enquiries, contact Susanna Thomas of Birnberg Peirce and Partners on 020 7911 0166.
NOTES:
1. Full background on this hearing is at http://policespiesoutoflives.potager.org/ncnd-5-6-jun/
2. Further background on NCND can be found at: http://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/the-case-overview/legal-battles/neither-confirm-nor-deny/
3. Delaying tactics from the police included a strike-out claim on
the basis of NCND – which was dropped at the last minute in March of
this year. Two large files of evidence were submitted to the Court by
the women’s lawyers to counter the strike out claim. These files
detailed instances where the police had confirmed the identities of
undercover officers; commented on operational tactics of these political
policing units; show the identities of the undercover officers reported
in the media; and where the women had meticulously compiled evidence
demonstrating that they can show the true identities of the officers.
4. This hearing concerns five of the eight women; the other three
women are also bringing claims under the Human Rights Act, including
suffering “inhumane and degrading treatment” and disruption of their
“private and family life, including the right to form relationships
without unjustified interference by the state”. They are fighting a
separate battle to stop their claims being sent to a secret court, the
IPT.

An IRA man linked to the Birmingham pub bombings has been given a paramilitary style funeral.
Shots
were fired over the tricolour-draped coffin of Seamus McLoughlin at a
relative’s home in the Ardoyne district of North Belfast on Wednesday
night.
It was claimed on Thursday that dissident republican group Oglaigh na hEireann fired the shots.
A
picture posted on Twitter showed two masked men in paramiltary style
clothing aiming two pistols over the coffin while another man similarly
dressed stood at the head of the casket.
Sources close to the
masked men told the Daily Mirror that McLoughlin was a “native of
Ardoyne” and one-time “OC [officer commanding] of the IRA in England”.
They confirmed a “volley of shots” was fired over the coffin at around 9pm on Wednesday.
A
number of sources said that McLoughlin had been on the run since the
Birmingham bombings in which 21 people were killed when devices went off
at two bars in the city in 1974.
The IRA denied the attack at the time and the real bombers have never been brought to justice.
Six people were arrested immediately after and in 1975 were given life sentences for the bombings.
But after 16 years in prison the convictions of the Birmingham Six were quashed after their "confessions" were ruled unreliable.
It is understood McLoughlin died in Dublin at the beginning of the week before being brought North for the wake.
Sources
claimed on Thursday that McLoughlin had not been tied in with any
so-called dissident groups. It was further claimed that he had not asked
for a paramilitary style send-off before his death.

The paramilitary style funeral given to a man with alleged links to
the Birmingham pub bombings has been branded “sickening” by a justice
campaigner.
Shots were fired over the tricolour-draped coffin of Seamus
McLoughlin at a relative’s home in the Ardoyne district of North Belfast
on Wednesday night.
It was claimed that dissident republican group Oglaigh na hEireann fired the shots.
A picture posted on Twitter showed two masked men in paramilitary
style clothing aiming two pistols over the coffin while another man
similarly dressed stood at the head of the casket.
Sources close to the masked men claimed McLoughlin was a “native of
Ardoyne” and one-time “OC [officer commanding] of the IRA in England”.
McLoughlin was also alleged to have had links to the Birmingham pub bombings which killed 21 people in 1974.
Brian Hambleton, who lost his sister Maxine in the atrocity, said he
was “shell-shocked” when he saw the funeral picture in a newspaper
report.
“It sickened me when I saw the picture,” he said.
“When I first saw it I had to look at the comments next to it because I thought I was looking at a picture of the past.
“It was like I was being whisked back to the 1970s.”
Mr Hambleton, who runs the Justice for the 21 campaign group
alongside his sister Julie, added: “McLoughlin was absolutely a major
player in the IRA.
“Here we are with his coffin being celebrated with an IRA style send-off with guns.
“All this was supposed to have been banned decades ago yet they’ve allowed it to happen.
“It’s as if the police have turned a blind eye for this to happen so there is no further trouble.”
It is understood McLoughlin died in Dublin at the beginning of the
week before being brought North for the wake. Sources claimed on
Thursday that McLoughlin had not been tied in with any so-called
dissident groups.
Six men, known as the Birmingham Six, were given life sentences for
the bombings and spent 17 years in jail before their convictions were
quashed by the Court of Appeal in 1991.
The IRA denied the attacks on The Mulberry Bush and The Tavern In The Town at the time.
The real bombers have never been brought to justice.

NWN: This wasn't in the 1970's,80's or 90's.............this was this week ! They have not gone away. They should have all been hung.This blog has always said the 'Birmingham 6' and the 'Guildford 4' were probably all guilty .

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Obama: 275 US forces deploying to Iraq

Interactive

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama is notifying Congress
that about 275 U.S. military personnel could deploy to Iraq.

Obama
says the forces are going to provide support and security for U.S.
personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. He says the forces are
equipped for combat and will remain in Iraq until the security situation
becomes such that they are no longer needed.

About
160 troops are already in Iraq, including 50 Marines and more than 100
Army soldiers. Some of those soldiers have only recently arrived.

Under
the authorization Obama outlined, a U.S. official says the U.S. will
put an additional 100 soldiers in a nearby third country where they
would be held in reserve until needed.

Friday, June 13, 2014

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: So when will being 'white British' become a crime?

Amid all the furore about
Islamist infiltration of schools in Birmingham, another story involving
the education watchdog Ofsted has received rather less attention.Inspectors
have criticised a rural school in Devon for being insufficiently
‘diverse’. Although they concede that Payhembury Primary is a ‘happy
place’, it has been denied an ‘outstanding’ rating because all 68 pupils
are of ‘white British heritage’.Well,
they would be. Small villages in Devon tend not to be melting pots of
multiculturalism. In fact, outside the big cities, most people in
Britain are of ‘white British heritage’ even though the mass immigration
of the past 15 years is changing that demographic rapidly.

+4

Inspectors have criticised rural Payhembury Primary School in Devon for being insufficiently 'diverse'

Parents have been told that they must
pay £35 to send their children on a ‘sleep-over’ at a school in
Isleworth, West London, where three-quarters of pupils are from ethnic
minority backgrounds.Headteacher
Penny Hammett wrote: ‘The purpose of this trip is to build up a
relationship with a school in a very different community to ours. This
will enable our children to gain a better understanding of multicultural
Britain, which was identified in our last Ofsted as being an area for
development.‘Through our
topics, visitors and discussions we have been developing multicultural
awareness in both Britain and throughout the world, but this visit will
help us to experience in real life a school where there is a wide mix of
children with different ethnic backgrounds and almost 50 per cent of
the children do not have English as their first language.’The
Rev Cate Edmonds, chairman of the governors at Payhembury, said: ‘We
are fairly mono-cultural as an area in Devon and we don’t want children
growing up thinking the whole world is full of trees and cows.’But
one mother objected: ‘I’m astounded by this idea. Just because the
children go to a small school in the country does not mean they aren’t
aware of people with different-coloured skin to them. It’s very
patronising — and for the school they are visiting, too.’ Let
me make it absolutely clear before the usual excitable suspects start
bouncing up and down screaming ‘racism’ that it’s commendable for kids
to learn about different cultures. Exchange
visits for schoolchildren have been going on since the Sixties,
initially introduced to help them develop their foreign language skills.I’m
fortunate to live in a part of North London where friends and
neighbours from all kinds of ethnic and religious backgrounds rub along
well together.Even 25 years
ago, my children’s school photo looked as if it had been plucked
straight from the pages of a United Colors of Benetton catalogue. But I
despise the officially sanctioned cult of separate development
masquerading as multiculturalism.

+4

Parents have been told that they must pay £35 to
send their children on a 'sleep-over' at a school in Isleworth, West
London, where thre-quarters of pupils are from ethnic minority
backgrounds

Just as it is appalling
that Muslim children in the Midlands are being taught that all white
women are prostitutes and Western values are dangerous, so it is only
right and proper that pupils growing up in the Devon countryside are
made aware of the wider world outside their immediate vicinity.No,
what bothers me about all this is the language being used and the
element of compulsion — as well as the frankly sinister revelation that a
school can be marked down by Ofsted not because of the standard of
education it provides but because there are too few black and brown
faces in the playground.Why should a school be penalised because its pupils are from a ‘white British heritage’ background?It
all smacks of Labour’s deliberate policy of opening the immigration
floodgates to ‘rub the Right’s noses in diversity’. And although the
trip is voluntary, you know perfectly well that any parent who protests
and refuses to cough up £35 will be categorised as a knuckle-scraping
Neanderthal.In some schools
in London, the roll call is similarly mono-cultural, but 100 per cent
Muslim rather than exclusively C of E. Are devout Islamic parents in
Tower Hamlets going to be told they must fork out £35 for their
children to be sent on a sleep-over in Devon so they can meet people of a
‘white British heritage’ and learn all about the Anglican faith?What do you think?If
country folk wish to visit the inner city, they are free to do so — and
vice versa. But the State is obsessed with ‘celebrating diversity’, our
new officially-enforced religion.

...Just as it is appalling that Muslim
children in the Midlands are being taught that all white women are
prostitutes and Western values are dangerous, so it is only right and
proper that pupils growing up in the Devon countryside are made aware of
the wider world outside their immediate vicinity

We are quite capable of celebrating anything we like, thanks very much, without Government intervention.Millions
of pounds are frittered away each year nagging, cajoling and compelling
us to embrace different cultures. Great effort goes into persuading
people from an immigrant background to make more use of the British
countryside.For instance, a
few years ago the Environment Agency announced that fishing was
horribly white, male and middle-aged. It decided to splash out £100,000
to attract more women and ethnic minorities to the riverbank.To
demonstrate the Government’s commitment, a pilot scheme was launched in
Swansea, which involved taking Muslim women and children to a lake and
teaching them to fish for trout.It
was headed by Nica Pritchard, the international president of the
Ladies’ Fly Fishing Association, who said: ‘A couple of hours out in the
countryside and you come back a new woman. If you could just see their
faces when we’re teaching them, you’d know we’re really on to
something.’ Talk about
patronising. It made them sound like special needs children. But what
struck me about the accompanying picture of these poor women was that
they were forced to wear goggles over their traditional Islamic
headscarves on the insistence of elf’n’safety officials.You couldn’t make it up.Let’s
hope the children of Devon have a whale of a time in Isleworth. They
should make the most of it before possession of a ‘white British
heritage’ is made a criminal offence.

Sunday, June 08, 2014

Sunday, June 08, 2014
At 8 am on Thursday June 5 revisionist publisher Simon Sheppard,
of North Yorkshire, was woken up by a group of police threatening to
break down the door of his house unless he opened it immediately, even
refusing his request to be allowed to put on some clothes first.
Once inside, they arrested him on "suspicion of
distributing racially inflammatory material, under section 19 of the
Public Order Act 1986", allowed him to dress, handcuffed him and took
him away.
Soon afterwards a search team arrived on the
premises to prowl through his materials, confiscating two computers and
some books (he does not know which).
Sheppard’s friend Paul Ballard explains
" … it seems that some sourpuss at the Post Office opened an outgoing package, saw something about Anne Frank,
deemed it 'anti Semitic' and reported it to the police. This was enough
for the special 'anti racist' task forces to spring into action."
Suspect Sheppard was detained until 1 pm, then
bailed for three months, during which time he may or may not be charged
with having committed an as yet unspecified act.
His activity as a revisionist publisher is well
known to the authorities: in 2008 he was tried and convicted for
distribution of "racist" tracts and imprisoned for three years. But he
is unbowed, having no intention of giving up his life's work merely
because the arbitrary ruling power disapproves of it.
Today the offence of "distributing racially
inflammatory material" carries a sentence of up to seven years. So much
for freedom of expression in England.

David
Irving comments:
WE have to ask who were the traitors
who allowed this to happen to Britain. In
1962 finally an act was passed restricting
coloured immigration into England -- too
late, and not strict enough even then.
Lord Hailsham was one such traitor, as I
reported on Day
15 in the Lipstadt Trial, cross
examined about a
speech I made in 1990 to my Clarendon
Club.In
1954 Lord Hailsham (right) said
that only 100,000 immigrants had so far
arrived and he did not expect many more.
Rather like Tony Blair last year with the
influx from East Europe, only far more
deadly. I am glad to say that The
Times reported my swipe at Hailsham
the next day.
The cowardly newspapers
always allow others to take the heat --
they are too frightened to say these
patriotic things themselves -- and if
others say them, the newspapers call them
"racist." Nobody has dared pin that label
in Churchill, yet.

Day
15 of the Lipstadt trial, 2000:MR RAMPTON: Could
you turn to -- this is the
Clarendon
Club in
1990?
Can you turn to page 9 of 12, please? I am
going to read the whole of
this.You say: "Thus, we
follow this tangled thread. At the end of
the war in 1945, the British Empire was at
its greatest ever extent in history. Our
armies straddled the globe. We were
beginning to get back the territories that
we had lost in the Far East through
Churchill's foolish military and naval
strategy. And suddenly the Empire
went.Groping around in
the darkness, we look for", capital G,
"Guilty", capital M, "Men. Partly I think
that we must blame sins of omission. If we
look back from where Britain is now, with
just a handful of people of true English,
Irish, Scots and Welsh stock -
apprehensive, furtively meeting in dinners
like this, exchanging our own shared
sensations and sorrows - then we can see
where some of the worst errors have been
made."In 1958, for
example, we find Lord Hailsham saying at a
Cabinet meeting, 'I do not think this
Coloured Immigration is going to be much
of a problem in Britain.We only have
100,000 of these immigrants so far, and I
do not think the numbers are likely to
grow much beyond that! So on balance I am
against having any restrictions imposed".
. . Then you close the
quote from Lord Hailsham and you say:
"Traitor No. 1 to the British cause". What
do you mean by that?IRVING. Lord
Hailsham, these were records that were in
1988 just released from the Public Record
Office, Cabinet records, and they reveal
Lord Hailsham, who later became a Lord
Chancellor, I believe, having said at a
Cabinet meeting in 1958 in a totally
negligent manner that he did not think
that immigration into Britain was going to
be a problem and that so far only 100,000
had arrived, and he thought it would not
go to more than that.