I am working on thesis where are debating about taking homeopathic medicine without prescription as an OTC and getting results vs generic prescription medicines which are quite hard to get and often leads to death if medicine is delayed. What are your views about it. You can always email me or we can keep contact on ibrahimpasha63@gmail.com

]]>By: Dr. Nancy Malikhttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-11043
Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:26:38 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-11043Thank You Dr. Anmol. Regards
]]>By: Dr.Anmol Dhawanhttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-10751
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:18:02 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-10751excellent work
]]>By: Dr. Nancy Malikhttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-4942
Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:22:50 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-4942Dear Homeopath
Thanks for your kind words.
Feel free to quote papers from this page to whosoever demands evidence.
The next iteration to improve this page will come by the year end.
Regards
]]>By: potentised practitionerhttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-4924
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:38:18 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-4924Thank the lord that someone has finally found the time to produce a well organised and comprehensive list of research to help us combat all those negative and clueless souls who keep trying to knock homeopathy down. No doubt some quantum physicist will eventually prove once and for all what we’ve known to be true through our many years as practitioners – that homeopathy is a powerful and highly effective medical treatment for a wide range of health conditions
]]>By: Dr. Nancy Malikhttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-4703
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:57:33 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-4703Thank You Nathalie for your appreciation. I am going to give this page a facelift by this year end. Regards
]]>By: Nathalie Parmentier, Klassiek Homeopaathttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-4666
Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:06:28 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-4666Thnaks a lot for this wonderful work, I use it very often when people ask if homeopathy is scientifically proven.
]]>By: Great Ape Thoughtshttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-4209
Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:26:33 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-4209On the off chance that you have missed my recent responce on my blog, which you have debated, I just thought that I would inform you that I have finally managed to look over the data you sent me and would like to start the debate again.

I would also like to thank you for your patience in my delayed responce. I was dealing with some matters in my personal life and could not take the time to worry about my blog until recently. We can continue this debate on my post about homeopathy.

]]>By: Jakehttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-3278
Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:39:00 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-3278Homeopathy is bunk, even when dressed up in scientific terms with cherry-picked, methodologically-flawed studies picked in support of it.
]]>By: Dr. Nancy Malikhttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-3038
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:42:12 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-3038Fournier, I am grateful for your corrections. Regards
]]>By: Dr. Nancy Malikhttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-3037
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:41:13 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-3037Thank You Fournier for your keen observation. Changes would be made in the next edit. Regards
]]>By: Fournier Denishttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-3036
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:22:39 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-3036Oh! I forgot the URL (Google Books) to the first publication of the “Archiv” in 1822: http://books.google.ca/books?id=LJUYAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:0QA_3KqcKt_WVylawQ&hl=de&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
]]>By: Fournier Denishttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-3035
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:19:00 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-3035May I suggest a correction about “Significant Dates”:
First number of Stapf’s “Archiv…” was published in 1822 and not 23.
I also suggest to translate the name of the magazine (Archiv für die homöopathische Heilkunst) as “Archive for homeopathic healing art”. Hahnemann would endorse…
]]>By: Dr. Nancy Malikhttps://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/#comment-2812
Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:54:51 +0000http://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy-pocy7w49ru14-2/#comment-2812Thank You John. In many of the links, the crux of the paper is included in the title for those who do not have time to delve into details. Evidence for homeopathy is for all to see.
]]>