On 27 Feb 2008, at 14:43, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Inter-op would argue for an XSLT 1.0 transform that probably can be
> done, but it may be easier to have an XSLT 2.0 transform.
Thinking about it, the trickiest bit will be dealing with URIs and
CURIEs. Having to write a relative URI resolver will be annoying (but
it's been done...there are RDF/XML parsers in XSLT)
> I tend to agree with Bijan's judgement that in principle this is
> possible (although I would expect corner cases which don't work,
> e.g. a property http://example.org/000)
[snip]
Well, this is a case where the RDF/XML can't rep it anyway, so that's
fine (or, rather, an instance of a known limitation of the target
format).
Cheers,
Bijan.