On Sunday, May 18, 2003, 4:13:40 AM, Steve wrote:
SS> Oh, I understand that. The reason for my post is that the current SVG
SS> spec uses the symbol
SS> <uri>
SS> in two different ways. In other words, you can't have a single grammar
SS> that describes a <uri>, because there are actually two different things
SS> that the spec calls <uri>.
Yes. I understood that, but was seeing how many symbols it had to be
split into. I counted two but wondered if there were others.
--
Chris mailto:chris@w3.org