AVAILABILITY: Copies of the OMB Circular A-76, its Revised Supplemental Handbook and
currently applicable Transmittal Memoranda may be obtained at the OMB Home page. The
online address (URL) is http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/circulars/index.html#numerical.

In last year's Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act (FAIR) guidance (OMB Circular A-76
Transmittal Memorandum No. 20), OMB stated that the statutory 30-day and 28-day challenge
and challenge response periods would be calendar days, while the 10-day appeal period would be
working days. OMB is aware that the 30-day deadline for filing challenges was very difficult to
meet in 1999. OMB therefore proposes to change, Appendix 2, paragraph g.3., of the Revised
Supplemental Handbook to provide for 30-working days. It is likewise proposed that Appendix 2,
paragraph g.4., be changed to reflect 28-working days.

When asked what, if any, other changes are needed to the Supplemental Handbook, the
Department of Defense expressed only one concern - that Part 1, Chapter 3, paragraph K.1.e.,
which requires appellants to "demonstrate that the items appealed (in an A-76 cost comparison)
individually or in aggregate, would reverse the tentative decision," appears to be in conflict with
the statement at Part 1, Chapter 3, paragraph K.7., that provides that sequential appeals are not
authorized. It has been suggested that these two statements create an inappropriate standard for
the initial winner of the tentative decision. We agree. All concerns regarding the conduct of a
cost comparison should be brought forward to the appeal authority within the single appeal
period. Therefore, to ensure that all relevant concerns with the conduct of a cost comparison are
brought forward, it is proposed that Part 1, Chapter 3, paragraph K.1.e. be voided.

Recently, the General Accounting Office expressed concerns regarding the inclusion of Federal
employees, whose jobs are included in an A-76 cost comparison study, as members of a related
A-76 Source Selection Team. As a result, OMB has decided to strengthen its long standing policy
limiting such participation, as a better business practice. Individuals who hold positions in an A-76 study should not be members of the Source Selection Team, unless an exception is authorized
by the head of the contracting activity. Exceptions may be authorized only in compelling
circumstances and, in such cases, the head of the contracting activity will provide a written
statement of the reasons for the action. OMB has also been concerned that serving on a Source
Selection Team develops certain important skills among the employees that the Government
could be in greater risk of losing, if this "workforce investment" became subject to being
outsourced. OMB has, therefore, determined that restrictions on source selection evaluation or
advisory team membership should be clarified. OMB proposes to revise Part 1, Chapter 3
paragraph H. 3.b. of the Revised Supplemental Handbook as follows:

b. "The Government should establish a source selection evaluation or advisory team. Individuals
who hold positions in the function under study should not be members of the team, unless an
exception is authorized by the head of the contracting activity. Exceptions will be authorized
only in compelling circumstances and, in such cases, the head of the contracting activity shall
provide a written statement of the reasons for the action."

Sylvia M. MathewsDeputy Director

Circular No. A-76 (Revised)
Transmittal Memorandum No. 22

TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

SUBJECT: Performance of Commercial Activities

This Transmittal Memorandum implements changes to the OMB Circular A-76 Revised
Supplemental Handbook in furtherance of the requirements of the Federal Activities Inventory
Reform Act ("The FAIR Act"), Public Law 105-270 and to clarify other issues of concern. The
March 1996 Revised Supplemental Handbook was issued through Transmittal Memorandum 15,
published in the April 1, 1996, Federal Register at pages 14338-14346. The March 1996
Revised Supplemental Handbook was further revised to implement the requirements of the FAIR
Act on June 14, 1999, Federal Register at pages 33927-33935.

The Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act (FAIR) provides that there shall be a 30-day
administrative challenge period available to interested parties who might wish to challenge and
agency's decision to include or omit an activity from the list of potential commercial activities.
As a part of OMB Circular A-76 Transmittal Memorandum No. 20, dated June 14, 1999, OMB
stated that the statutory 30-day and 28-day challenge and challenge response periods would be
calendar days, while the 10-day appeal period would be working days. OMB is aware that the 30-day deadline for filing challenges was very difficult to meet in 1999. Appendix 2, paragraph g.3.,
of the Revised Supplemental Handbook is, therefore, revised to reflect 30-working days.
Appendix 2, paragraph g.4., is also changed to reflect 28-working days.

Concern has been expressed that Part 1, Chapter 3, paragraph K.1.e., may be in conflict with the
statement at Part 1, Chapter 3, paragraph K.7., that provides that sequential administrative cost
comparison appeals are not authorized. It is OMB's view that all concerns regarding the conduct
of a cost comparison should be brought forward to the designated appeal authority within the
single appeal period. Therefore, to ensure that all relevant concerns with the conduct of a cost
comparison are brought forward, Part 1, Chapter 3, paragraph K.1.e. is hereby voided.

And finally, OMB has been concerned that the use of Federal employees on Source Selection
Teams, when those employees are subject to losing their jobs or otherwise being adversely
affected by the award of the contract being reviewed by that Source Selection Team, is a poor
business practice. OMB is also concerned that such a practice puts certain important skills that
are developed by participating on a Source Selection Team at Risk. Therefore, OMB revises
Part 1, Chapter 3 paragraph H. 3.b. of the Revised Supplemental Handbook as follows:

b. "The Government should establish a source selection evaluation or advisory team.
Individuals who hold positions in the function under study should not be members of
the team, unless an exception is authorized by the head of the contracting activity.
Exceptions will be authorized only in compelling circumstances and, in such cases, the
head of the contracting activity shall provide a written statement of the reasons for the
action. As a result, OMB has decided to strengthen its long standing policy limiting
such participation, as a better business practice. Individuals who hold positions in an A-76 study should not be members of the Source Selection Team, unless an exception is
authorized by the head of the contracting activity. Exceptions may be authorized only in
compelling circumstances and, in such cases, the head of the contracting activity will
provide a written statement of the reasons for the action."

All changes in this Transmittal Memorandum are effective immediately and shall apply to all cost
comparisons in process where the Government's in-house cost estimate has not been publicly
revealed before this date. Current A-76 guidance can be accessed at OMB's home page at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/circulars/index.html#numerical.