Being a proud Atheist, and a freedom loving INFIDEL AKA "KUFFAR", WE are threatened by the primitive pidgeon chested jihad boys in the medieval east.
FRACK YOU!! SAY US ALL!! Don't annoy the Pagans and Bikers,, it's a islam FREE ZONE!!! LAN ASTASLEM!!!!

A mass brawl involving hundreds of people broke out at a refugee
shelter in Berlin on Sunday. Police made a number of arrests after
being called in to restore order. The fight came just hours after a
scuffle at a separate shelter left several people wounded.

The fight, which broke out at a shelter at the disused Tempelhof airport, erupted while lunch was being served.

"There were apparently many hundreds of people involved," a police spokesperson told Reuters.
A
total of 830 refugees and migrants were present at the facility, and
around 20 or 30 people caused the disruption, according to Michael
Elias, who is in charge of the shelter.

"It's
the simple fact that there are a lot of young men traveling alone here.
We withdrew...because the situation simply exploded. It was a complete
blow-out,” Elias said.

An unspecified number of arrests were made after around 100 police officers arrived at the scene to restore order.

It
came just hours after a brawl at a separate refugee shelter in the
Berlin suburb of Spandau forced 500 residents to flee the building in “fear and panic.”
People
smashed windows, threw sofas and emptied fire extinguishers, police
told AFP, adding that several residents were wounded in the violence.

Two
additional disturbances also broke out at other German shelters on
Sunday. Five people were injured in a fight between Syrians in the
showers of a residence in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt, while a
17-year-old was struck on the head with a belt by another youth at a
refugee home in Berlin's Kreuzberg area.

Germany's police union
previously called for refugees and migrants to be separated by religion
and country of origin to minimize the potential for conflict as the
country struggles to handle hundreds of thousands of new arrivals.

The
scuffles come after the police union and women's rights groups accused
authorities earlier this year of downplaying reports of sexual assault
and rape at refugee shelters because they feared a backlash against
asylum seekers from German residents. Interior Minister Thomas de
Maiziere has called on Germans to avoid blanket suspicion of refugees.

Germany
expects to take in one million refugees and migrants this year alone,
and is housing asylum seekers in apartments, army barracks, sports
halls, and tent cities.

Obama's
Religious Test for CompassionMuslims
over Christians

Slightly edited version of article originally published under
the title "Exposed: Obama's Love for Jihadis and Hate for
Christians."

Rather
than welcoming Iraqi Christian asylum-seekers, the Obama administration
has imprisoned many of
them.

Obama recently lashed out against the idea of giving preference to
Christian refugees, describing it as "shameful." "That's not
American. That's not who we are. We don't have religious tests to our
compassion," loftily added the American president.

Accordingly, the administration is still determined to accept 10,000
more Syrian refugees, almost all of whom will be Muslim, despite the fact
that some are ISIS operatives, while many share the ISIS worldview (as
explained below).

Yet right as Obama was grandstanding about "who we are,"
statistics were released indicating
that "the current [refugee] system overwhelmingly favors Muslim
refugees. Of the 2,184 Syrian refugees admitted to the United States so
far, only 53 are Christians while 2,098 are Muslim."

Aside from the obvious—or to use Obama's own word,
"shameful"—pro-Muslim, anti-Christian bias evident in these
statistics, there are a number of other troubling factors as well.

Nearly all Syrian 'refugees'
admitted to the U.S. are Sunni Muslims.

For starters, the overwhelming majority of "refugees" being
brought into the United States are not just Muslim, but Sunnis—the one
Muslim sect that the Islamic State is not persecuting and
displacing. After all, ISIS—and most Islamic terrorist groups (Boko Haram, Al
Qaeda, Al Shabaab, Hamas, et al)—are all Sunnis. Even Obama was
arguably raised
a Sunni.

As for those who are being raped, slaughtered, and enslaved based on
their non-Sunni religious identity—not by Assad, but by so-called
"rebel" forces (AKA jihadis)—many of them are being denied refuge
in America.

Thus, although Christians were approximately 10 percent of Syria's
population in 2011, they comprise only 2.5 percent of those granted refuge
in America. This despite the fact that, from a strictly humanitarian point
of view—and humanitarianism is the chief reason being cited in accepting
refugees, Obama's "compassion"—Christians should receive priority
simply because they
are the most persecuted group in the Middle East.

Obama's policies in the Middle East
have directly exacerbated the plight of its Christians.

ISIS has committed no such atrocities against fellow Sunnis, they who
are being accepted into the U.S. in droves. Nor does Assad enslave, behead,
or crucify people based on their religious identity (despite
Jeb Bush's recent, and absurd, assertions).

Obama should further prioritize Christian refugees simply because his
own policies in the Middle East have directly exacerbated their plight.
Christians and other religions minorities did not flee from Bashar Assad's
Syria, Saddam Hussein's Iraq, or Muamar Gaddafi's Libya. Their systematic
persecution began only after the U.S. interfered in those nations in
the name of "democracy" but succeeding in only uncorking the
jihadi terrorists that the dictators had long kept suppressed.

Incidentally, prioritizing Christian refugees would not merely be an
altruistic gesture or the U.S. government's way of righting its wrongs: rather
it brings many benefits to America's security. (Unlike Muslims or even
Yazidis, Christians are easily assimilated into Western nations due to the
shared Christian heritage, and they bring trustworthy language and
cultural skills that are beneficial to the "war on terror.")

Finally, no one should be shocked by these recent revelations of the
Obama administration's pro-Muslim and anti-Christian policies. They fit a
clear and established pattern of religious bias within his administration.
For example:

When the UN Security
Council held a meeting to
discuss the genocide against Christians and other minorities,
although "many high level delegations from UN member states
addressed the Security Council meeting, some at the Foreign Minister
level, the United States failed to send ... a high ranking member of
the State Department."

Most recently, as the White House works on releasing a statement
accusing ISIS of committing genocide against religious minorities such as
Yazidis — who are named and recognized in the statement — Obama officials
are arguing that Christians "do
not appear to meet the high bar set out in the genocide treaty"
and thus will likely not be mentioned.

In short, and to use the president's own words, it is the Obama
administration's own foreign and domestic policies that are
"shameful," that are "not American," and that do not
represent "who we are."

Yet the question remains: Will Americans take notice and do anything
about their leader's policies—which welcome Islamic jihadis while ignoring
their victims—or will their indifference continue until they too become
victims of the jihad, in a repeat of Paris or worse?

Raymond Ibrahim is a Judith
Friedman Rosen fellow at the Middle East Forum and a Shillman fellow at the
David Horowitz Freedom Center.

[1] Even before the new "caliphate" was
established, Christians were and continue to be targeted by Muslims—Muslim
mobs, Muslim individuals, Muslim regimes, and Muslim terrorists, from
Muslim countries of all races (Arab, African, Asian, etc.)—and for the same
reason: Christians are infidel number one. See Crucified
Again: Exposing Islam's New War on Christians for hundreds of
anecdotes before the rise of ISIS as well as the Muslim doctrines
that create such hate and contempt for Christians who are especially
deserving of refugee status.

The Nov. 20 terrorist
attack at the Radisson Blu hotel in the capital city of Bamako shows
that radical Islamists continue to be active in Mali. Reportedly, the
attack was to thwart the peace accord between the Azawad National
Liberation Movement (MNLA) seeking autonomy, and the Mali government. I
believe the Islamists embedded in the northern region want to hinder the
peace process so they can create an Islamic caliphate.

The Islamists reportedly affiliated with Moktar Belmoktar's
al-Mourabitoune militia killed 18 hotel guests and one local guard. Two of
the Islamist gunmen were also killed. I had stayed at the Radisson Blu
hotel in the past and found it popular with foreign business people,
diplomats, and airline personnel.

In March 2012, Mali's President Amadou Toumani Toure was deposed in a
military coup due to his lack of support for fighting the northern Tuareg
separatists who had become affiliated with radical Islamists and
continually put the Malian soldiers under siege. The Islamists took
advantage of the poorly equipped military and seized control of the towns
of Timbuktu, Gao, and Kidal.

Instituting Sharia law, the Islamists brutalized the townspeople,
destroying radios, TV's, musical instruments and modern conveniences not in
accord with their strict interpretation of Islamic tenets. To add to the
instability, massive amounts of weapons came back from Libya with Tuareg
fighters after the fall of Muammar Gadhafi. With the arms also came an
influx of jihadists. Northern Mali, the size of Texas, became the epicenter
for Islamists from as far away as Pakistan and Afghanistan. Some of the
Islamists had been involved in the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks on the U.S.
diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

I first visited Mali in January 2000 with an archeological group,
visiting UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Africa and the Middle East. Mali was
a highlight with its ancient mud mosques in Djenne and Timbuktu. A center
of education and religious learning Timbuktu's importance dated back to the
15th century; home to a vast collection of historical manuscripts which the
radical Islamists tried to destroy.

I was in Mali again on Sept. 18, 2012, shortly after the Benghazi
attack, and chatter indicated al-Qaida affiliates were involved. My visit
was for the dedication of an elementary school that our foundation helped
fund for my friend Yeah Samake, who was the mayor of Ouelessebougou, a town
located 50 miles south of Bamako. Yeah arranged for me to meet with
government and religious leaders, and to visit the Mintao refugee camp in
neighboring Burkina Faso where we met with Tuareg elders. The Malians I met
with were moderate and very concerned about the radical Islamists who had
taken control of the northern region displacing 400,000 ethnic Tuaregs and
Arabs.

In January 2013, acting President Dioncounda Traore called French
President Francois Hollande to ask for military assistance, since al-Qaida
in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) and other Islamists had descended south of
Konna just 300 miles from Bamako. France immediately sent ground troops and
Mirage jets from neighboring Chad to support the Malian military.

Within weeks, the Islamists were driven from Timbuktu, Gao, and Kidal,
scattering them into the vast desert and frontier mountain region near the
Algerian border. The French forces, however, should have destroyed the
Islamist militias when they had the chance since the concern was that they
would return. Today, the French and U.N. peacekeeping forces are still
fighting these radical Islamists, with over 40 soldiers killed since 2013.

AQIM was the outgrowth of a dissident group in Algeria that in the 1990s
attempted to overthrow President Abdelaziz Bouteflika's regime. In 2003,
they moved into Mali and became affiliated with Ansar al-Dine, a terrorist
group composed of Tuareg fighters that had left the MNLA. The region soon
became a safe haven for Islamists including Movement for Oneness in Jihad
in West Africa (MOJWA) and other foreign insurgents.

The Tuaregs were pushed aside in a power struggle with the Islamists. In
a dispute with al-Qaida leaders, Moktar
Belmoktar broke away and formed his own militia, which in January 2013
was responsible for the attack on an Algerian natural gas plant, killing 39
foreign workers.

When I visited Mali in March 2013, the French had driven the Islamists
from the three northern towns. Yeah arranged for me to meet the French
ambassador, who was confident the Islamists would be defeated. French
troops would stay until after the national elections could be safely
undertaken. Planning to visit Timbuktu, I met with Yeah's friend Mahamadou
Alou Toure, the mayor of Bourem Sidi-Amar, a town located 30 miles from
Timbuktu. Knowing the area well, he agreed to travel with us and arrange
for meetings with village elders, and Tuareg dissidents in Timbuktu.

Destruction at former
Islamist base. Photos courtesy of John Price.

Early the next morning, we started our long drive to Douentza, a town
400 miles north of Bamako, where an army escort would take us through the
desolate desert to Timbuktu. Earlier that day we stopped at the Islamist
base in Konna that was destroyed by the French. Burned out gun-mounted
pickup trucks, armored vehicles, and ammunition bunkers indicated a fierce
battle had taken place, with many Islamists being killed.

Our military escort
consisted of 20 soldiers and four pickup trucks with mounted machine guns.
The route covered 120 miles over the rugged terrain. The concern was that
Islamists could still be embedded in the area, especially near the Niger
River crossing. Mahamadou made arrangements for a ferry to take us across,
arriving in Timbuktu after midnight; encountering only two flat tires in
the twenty-hour trip.

We met the next morning with Col. Keba Sangare at Fort Elbekaye. Sangare
noted security had improved dramatically since a year earlier when Timbuktu
was under siege. More than 1,000 Islamists had been driven out of the area
since January. However, Sangare noted that if the French troops were to
leave it would be difficult to keep the region secure since the Islamists
would return.

With six added military vehicles and more than a dozen soldiers, the
caravan traveled to Mahamadou's village, Bourem Sidi-Amar. Hundreds of
people lined the narrow dirt road waving Malian and French flags and
cheerfully dancing, singing songs, and playing musical instruments which
were not allowed under Islamist control. Sangare told the villagers that
they could count on the military to protect them. The village elders said
they were thankful the Islamists were gone and free of their brutal acts.

Timbuktu felt peaceful, with shops open again and people mingling
around. On a street corner, young boys huddled around a radio listening to
music, which was forbidden under Sharia law. The Hotel Colombe where we
stayed barely managed to remain open, the manager told me. Without the foreign
journalists and government people they could not survive. He was hopeful
that security in the area would continue so tourists could again arrive at
the airport, the main access to Timbuktu.

I was awakened at 4 a.m. the next day by several explosions. At first I
thought it was a dream. Then reality set in as the continuous gunfire
lasted several hours. At daybreak, Mirage jets traversed overhead. A knock
on the door summoned me to meet at the neighboring military base where Col.
Sangare gave us a briefing. He noted that at a checkpoint five miles from
Timbuktu a vehicle drove past without stopping. In the firefight that
ensued, five insurgents were killed and one was captured. An insurgent in
the vehicle detonated his suicide vest, killing one soldier and injuring
six others. At the airport, two suicide bombers were killed before they
could detonate their vests. Timbuktu was under tight security, and leaving
would be difficult since no military escort would be provided.

In the hotel lobby, the next morning a Swedish TV producer alerted me
that a U.N. Humanitarian Air Service plane was coming to pick up 10
journalists. He suggested I call to see if I could get on the flight since
there were no other evacuation plans. With the help of the U.S. embassy in
Bamako, the U.N. dispatcher luckily had a seat available. Under tight
French security, the plane departed mid-morning for the town of Mopti,
where I arranged for an SUV to drive me back to Bamako, a grueling
fourteen-hour journey.

The attacks in Timbuktu were the first in several weeks. A few days
after we left, the Islamists came back and attacked the military base,
coming over the back wall of the hotel where we had stayed. The liberation
of Mali's northern towns may be short-lived since Islamists continue their
hit-and-run attacks. The insurgents' tactics now include suicide bombers
infiltrating the towns and villages, scaring people and their freedom. The
attacks at the Radisson Blu hotel in Bamako, and in Kidal last weekend have
further shaken Malians.

With limited French and U.N. peacekeeping forces and a stretched Malian
military covering such a wide territory, the recent attacks will not be the
last by the Islamists. If France could not stop the Islamists from creating
the carnage on Nov. 13 in their own backyard, then attacks in Mali will be
even more difficult to stop since intelligence resources are limited. If
Moktar Belmoktar was behind the Radisson Blu hotel attack, it could have
been in retribution for the French military incursion in northern Mali, and
to show support for the Islamist attacks in Paris.

Disrupting the peace accord between the Tuareg separatists and the Mali
government could also give the Islamists more time to
reach their goal of an Islamic caliphate in northern Mali.

John Price served as Ambassador to the Republic of
Mauritius, Republic of Seychelles, and Union of Comoros from 2002-2005.

The IPT accepts no funding from
outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or
religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on
Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All
donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The
Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3
organization.

Syria is a terror state. It didn’t become that way overnight
because of the Arab Spring or the Iraq War.

Its
people are not the victims of American foreign policy, Islamic militancy or
any of the other fashionable excuses. They supported Islamic terrorism.
Millions of them still do.

They are not the Jews fleeing a Nazi Holocaust. They are the Nazis trying to
relocate from a bombed out Berlin.

These are the cold hard facts.

ISIS took over parts of Syria because its government
willingly allied with it to help its terrorists kill Americans
in Iraq. That support for Al Qaeda helped lead to the civil war tearing the
country apart.

The Syrians were not helpless, apathetic pawns in this fight. They supported
Islamic terrorism.

A 2007 poll
showed that 77% of Syrians supported financing Islamic
terrorists including Hamas and the Iraqi fighters who evolved into ISIS. Less
than 10% of Syrians opposed their terrorism.

Why did Syrians support Islamic terrorism? Because they hated America.

Sixty-three percent wanted to refuse medical and humanitarian assistance
from the United States. An equal number didn’t want any American help caring
for Iraqi refugees in Syria.

The vast majority of Syrians turned down any form of assistance from the
United States because they hated us. They still do. Just because they’re
willing to accept it now, doesn’t mean they like us.

If we bring Syrian Muslims to America, we will be importing a population that
hates us.

The terrorism poll numbers are still ugly. A poll this summer found that 1 in 5 Syrians
supports ISIS. A third of Syrians support the Al Nusra
Front, which is affiliated with Al Qaeda. Since Sunnis are 3/4rs of the
population and Shiites and Christians aren’t likely to support either group,
this really means that Sunni Muslim support for both terror groups is even
higher than these numbers make it seem.

And even though Christians and Yazidis are the ones who actually face ISIS
genocide, Obama has chosen to take in few Christians and Yazidis. Instead 98.6% of
Obama’s Syrian refugees are Sunni Muslims.

This is also the population most likely to support ISIS and Al Qaeda.

But these numbers are even worse than they look. Syrian men are more likely
to view ISIS positively than women. This isn’t surprising as the Islamic
State not only practices sex slavery, but has some ruthless restrictions for
women that exceed even those of Saudi Arabia. (Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra
Front, however, mostly closes the gender gap getting equal support from
Syrian men and women.)

ISIS, however, gets its highest level of support from young men. This is the
Syrian refugee demographic.

In the places where the Syrian refugees come from, support for Al Qaeda
groups climbs as high as 70% in Idlib, 66% in Quneitra, 66% in Raqqa, 47% in
Derzor, 47% in Hasakeh, 41% in Daraa and 41% in Aleppo.

Seventy percent support for ISIS in Raqqa has been dismissed as the
result of fear. But if Syrians in the ISIS capital were just afraid of the
Islamic State, why would the Al Nusra Front, which ISIS is fighting, get
nearly as high a score from the people in Raqqa? The answer is that their
support for Al Qaeda is real.

Apologists will claim that these numbers don’t apply to the Syrian refugees.
It’s hard to say how true that is. Only 13% of Syrian refugees will admit to
supporting ISIS, though that number still means that of Obama’s first 10,000
refugees, 1,300 will support ISIS. But the poll doesn’t delve into their
views of other Al Qaeda groups, such as the Al Nusra Front, which usually
gets more Sunni Muslim support.

And there’s no sign that they have learned to reject Islamic terrorism and
their hatred for America.

By way of comparison, twice as many Iraqis see Islamic terrorism as a threat
than Syrians do and slightly more Palestinian Arabs view Islamic terrorism as
a threat than Syrians do. These are terrible numbers.

And these are the people whom our politicians would have us believe are
“fleeing an ISIS Holocaust.”

Seventy-three percent of Syrian refugees view US foreign policy negatively.
That’s a higher number than Iraqis. It’s about equal to that of Palestinian
Arabs.

They don’t like us. They really don’t like us.

Obama’s first shipment of Syrians will include 1,300 ISIS supporters and most
of the rest will hate this country. But unless they’re stupid enough to
announce that during their interviews, the multi-layered vetting that Obama
and other politicians boast about will be useless.

It only took 2 Muslim refugees to carry out the Boston Marathon massacre. It
only took 19 Muslim terrorists to carry out 9/11.

If only 1 percent of those 1,300 Syrian ISIS supporters put their beliefs
into practice, they can still kill thousands of Americans.

And that’s a best case scenario. Because it doesn’t account for how many
thousands of them support Al Qaeda. It doesn’t account for how many of them
back other Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas that had widespread support
in Syria.

While the media has shamelessly attempted to exploit the Holocaust to rally
support for Syrian migrants, the majority of Syrians supported Hamas whose
mandate is finishing Hitler’s work. The Hamas charter
describes a “struggle against the Jews” that culminates in another Holocaust.
Bringing Hamas supporters to America will lead to more Muslim Supremacist
violence against Jews in this country.

But all of this can be avoided by taking in genuine Syrian refugees.

While Obama insists on taking in fake Syrian refugees, mainly Sunni Muslims
from UN camps who support terrorism and are not endangered in Jordan or
Turkey, both Sunni countries, he is neglecting the real refugees, Christians
and Yazidis, who are stateless and persecuted in the Muslim world.

Instead of taking in fake refugees who hate us, we should be taking in real
refugees who need us.

Obama and Paul Ryan have claimed that a “religious test” for refugees is
wrong, but religious
tests are how we determine whether a refugee is really fleeing
persecution or is just an economic migrant.

The Sunni Muslims that Obama is taking in do not face persecution. They are
the majority. They are the persecutors. It’s the Yazidis and the Christians
who need our help. And these real refugees, unlike the fake Sunni Muslim
refugees, are not coming here to kill us. They truly have nowhere else to go.

Syria is a disaster because its rival Muslim religious groups are unable to
get along with each other. Bringing them to this country will only spread the
violence from their land to ours. Instead of taking in the religious majority
that caused this mess through its intolerance, we should take in their
victims; the Christians and Yazidis who are being slaughtered and enslaved by
ISIS.

Syrian Muslims are a nation of terrorist supporters. They destroyed their own
country. Let’s not let them destroy ours.

It’s time that we kept our nation safe by doing the right thing. Let’s take
in the real Christian and Yazidi refugees and let the fake Sunni Muslim
refugees and terrorist supporters stay in their own countries.

Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger
and a Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
(the Supreme Leader of Iran) has published a new 416-page book called
"Palestine." So far, the only place the book is available is in
Iran. Khamenei's position is, of course, that Israel has no right to exist.

"Khamenei claims that his strategy for the destruction of Israel is not
based on anti-Semitism," writes Amir Taheri in the New York Post, "which he
describes as a European phenomenon. His position is instead based on
'well-established Islamic principles.'

"One such principle is that a land that falls under Muslim rule, even
briefly, can never again be ceded to non-Muslims. What matters in Islam is
ownership of a land’s government, even if the majority of inhabitants are
non-Muslims."

Khamenei is well-versed in Islamic doctrine,
including advanced levels of Muslim education, and he was an Islamic teacher
and cleric before he started his political career.

"Dozens of maps circulate in the Muslim world showing the extent of
Muslim territories lost to the Infidel that must be recovered," writes
Taheri. "These include large parts of Russia and Europe, almost a third
of China, the whole of India and parts of the Philippines and Thailand."

http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and its Role in Enforcing Islamic Law

We need to get off Saudi Barbarian OIL!!!!!Support the Canadian OIL Sands,,, and visit,, Ethicaloil.org

The gravity of the existential threat we face from Islamic Jihad is truly of epic proportions. It is essentially a battle pitting free-civilized man against a totalitarian barbarian. What is at stake is the struggle for our very soul - namely who we are and what we represent. The lives that were sacrificed for individual rights and freedoms that we've come to cherish are being chiseled away from right under our noses by the stealth jihadists. And many of us are in denial and totally clueless.

The left's appeasement and pandering to evil is nothing new. What makes their utopian delusions so infuriating and unpardonable is that it is not only they who will have to pay the consequences, and deservedly, so, they are thwarting and undermining our best efforts at resistance and are thus dragging us down in the process as well.