Lets just face this fact first. The recent photo shoot of Kim Kardashian isn’t about Kim and her ass, its about the magazine called Paper, who I’m willing to bet that other then myself no one knew about outside of the New York City. The Kardashian shoot was the first I had ever heard of this magazine. So it is obvious that Paper is trying to keep itself relevant and they have done a great job by posting a semi-nude spread of one of Generation Y’s favorite whores.

I came upon this revelation as i looked at a variety of these pictures and the comments. Quite literally every American generation and every American Decade going back to the 50’s and maybe even the 40’s had their own whore. A woman who defied conventional stereotypes of women and how they should behave by acting sexy or being very sexual. Madonna and Ally McBeal were the ‘whores’ of my generation and now Gen Y has a slew of them; Miley Cyrus, Brittany Spears and so on. Hell we’ve even divided them by race, with Nicki Minaji as Black Gen Y’s ‘whore/slut’. They all have the same MO though, show as much flesh, talk about having as much sex, and create as much controversy as possible. And while we revile, marvel, and lust after them one thing will never change, they are all doing it for money, not for a cause, which is what makes them what I call them, whores, not icons of the cause of femininity or female sexuality.

P.S. The picture of the black female in the same pose as Kim is actually the original idea for the pose that Kim is doing. The pictures was taken back in 1985-86. And the photographer of Kim just rehashed his masterpiece with Kim for this shoot.

Gentlemen, you are a part of a new era, the era of the emotionally unavailable woman. These women are fierce; they are the pervasive norm among your 20-something female counterparts. Let’s take some time to understand them.

The Millennial woman is different from the women of former generations. We’re extremely career-driven, goal-oriented and independent. Since we tend to gear towards this path in life — to make our mark and leave the world with a legacy –, we also are inevitably emotionally unavailable.

So basically the millennial woman is a selfish workaholic like their father, who divorced their mother, and left them emotionally bereft. Good going ladies you’ll be like men in no time.

Thanks to the lady for writing this article. I now know i need to go out and find a woman from the ghetto or the nearest trailer park.

Hi there. Black Gamer here (more on this later). I’ve spent my entire life playing games. I’ve played as Black dudes, White dudes, Black girls, White girls, and all colors in between. I’ve never been the type to look into a deeper meaning with games (for the most part) simply because they’re an escape from real life and an opportunity to visit worlds that were once impossible to visit. From saving the Galaxy as Commander Shepard, advancing on the enemy nexus on Summoners Rift, to constantly getting C- teammate scores in NBA 2K, I’ve played all sorts of games.

Growing up, I was primarily a Nintendo gamer. I was subscribed to Nintendo Power and would wait eagerly for the next great issue to come into the mailbox. It might have been my impressionable mind as a kid, but I always had the idea that Nintendo made the best games and make…

I’m in a coffee shop reading a book. I look up. A beautiful young lady has entered the store. She’s wearing very short shorts (they used to be called Daisy Dukes, but that dates me). The zipper is pulled down revealing bikini bottoms. Her shirt only barely covers her breasts, leaving her abdomen uncovered. She’s blonde to the roots. Her lips are painted a luscious shade of dark red. The tops of her breasts are revealed down to her nipples.

She looks around as if expecting to find a friend. She sees me looking at her. I probably have a stunned look on my face. She can probably see the pulse throb in my neck. I am astonished by her beauty and easy sexuality. Her lips twist in a snarl. She sniffs in derision and heads toward the counter. I can hear the thought running through her mind. “Creep!”

I have had those reactions before, and not just with people. I’ve reacted that way to the sight of the Grand Canyon. A brilliant Aurora Borealis. An elegantly designed car can get my pulse racing. A passage in a book. I’ve been moved to tears by a particular interpretation of Henry V performed in the round. I have had the same expression on my face while holding a child born not more than an hour before in my arms. I’ve had that look while watching a painter bringing a beautiful landscape out of a white canvas (happy little trees!). People understand these reactions. They nod their heads and say, “Yeah, it’s beautiful.”

When I look at that young lady with her zipper down, revealing bikini bottoms, the half-shirt, and the gloriously painted lips, I am a creep.

I bet it’s not because of my gender. If Brad Pitt or Johnny Depp or some guy from One Direction looked at her that way, she’d probably go into paroxysms of joy. Or at the very least she’d be flattered. Unfortunately I am not gifted with fame, good looks, or youthful demeanor. I’ve had to take “glamor shots” for marketing purposes. I’ve had to do interviews. In both of those cases the hair and makeup people try heroically to make me look somewhat pleasing to the eye. Of course it’s like tying a bow onto a pig. Sure, the bow is pretty. It’s around the pig. But that’s about all you can say about that.

To this girl I am a creep because I am looking at her in appreciation while being old and ugly. Some older feminists might say that the simple act of looking “objectifies” her. That I’m simply appreciating meat and not a personality. They say that I have no right to be astonished by beauty. They say that I have no right to look at a woman unless it’s with total objective detachment. And I begin to wonder what kind of world these women want me to live in. There are movements in feminism that believe we should call the great artists of the past and their works misogynist, since they mainly dealt with the female nude form. Why not more male nude paintings? Certainly the Renaissance had a surfeit of nude males in sculpture and painting? Why are the painters of the 1800’s and beyond almost solely painting female nudes? It must be exploitation. It must be objectification.

They’re saying that I can not have my breath taken away by the curve of a woman’s buttocks. Or appreciate the gently sloping V from the tops of her hips down to the depths of her groin. Or appreciate the gentle slope of a breast in repose. If I do appreciate these things, then I’ve reduced her to only those things. As if by appreciating the view of the Colorado River from the lip of the Grand Canyon that I cannot then go on and understand its ecology and importance as a geographic structure.

The appreciation of beauty as a goal in itself is now a sin. If I’m awestruck with beauty, I am a beast.

There is a movement in feminism that says if a man and a woman make love while drunk, she can wake up and press rape charges. You see, she couldn’t possibly consent to sex if she was inebriated. It doesn’t matter that the man is in a similar state of mental dysfunction. It doesn’t matter that he had no indication whatsoever that she’d find the sex objectionable if she was sober. In fact, it doesn’t matter that she never said “no” or “wait” or “I’m too drunk to have sex”. She might have had a very pleasant time of it. But if she’s drunk while having her orgasms, he is a rapist. Please understand, I’m not talking blackout drunk or being drugged or otherwise incapacitated to the level of not being able to even SAY “no”. I’m talking about fully consented sex that is regretted later. Yet some feminists think that it’s okay to level the rape charge.

There are laws on the books that say that a woman’s past history can not be introduced at a rape trial. If she’s made false rape allegations in the past, the defense attorney for the man can not bring that up during trial. If the defendant was man #4 in a six man gang-bang, the defense attorney cannot ask her about the other five. Without any context, without the ability for the defense attorney to provide context, it comes down to her word against his. And even if the jury sides with him, he’s still tarred in his community as a person who was accused of rape.

The situation where a wife accuses her husband of molesting the kids during the divorce proceedings is so common it’s almost become cliche. Even if that accusation never makes it to court, it can be used in private to make the husband back off on demands for joint custody. The husband will back down because he doesn’t want that accusation to cause him to lose his job, his friends, his family, and possibly his freedom. The wife in this situation can get away with it because the courts are predisposed to believe accusations of fathers molesting their children.

And I don’t even want to talk alimony. I’ve seen too many friends destroyed financially because of it. They’re willing to pay child support, but then on top they have to pay ex-wife support as well. It’s an archaic marriage law concept from a time when women did not have careers, nor really the possibility of one. It’s out of date, but feminists fight against its removal tooth and nail.

If I sound like some sort of Mens Rights Activist and misogynist bastard to you, I understand. This kind of talk is typical of the MRA platform. Not surprisingly, MRA is considered to be a haven for pedophile men by feminists.

The fact is I love women. I love strong, opinionated women who fight to be heard and respected. I love watching movies where the female lead kicks ass and is her own woman. I’ve had girlfriends who frighten other guys with their assertiveness.

I think women should be allowed into every job and role in society that they are qualified for. I think they should be paid as much as men for doing those jobs. I’m a huge proponent of Title IX. I think Gina Carrano (did I spell that right?) is one of the sexiest women alive. In my romances I want a 50/50 partnership where neither person takes more than they give.

In the times I’ve had to employ women, I’ve treated them as professionals and promote or fire them because of their actions, not their gender. I believe in total equality between the sexes, not the kind of equality that “grades on a scale”.

But nah, I’m probably considered some drooling Men’s Rights knuckle-dragger by feminists…

What I object to is the feminist desire to go beyond the scope of being treated as total equals. A lot of rape shield laws were enacted due to the notion that women would feel attacked on the witness stand and thus would refuse to testify. This is odious to me. This assumes that women need protection because they are “weak”. Rape shield laws enshrine the inequality of women in this society by presuming their weakness.

When Monica Lewinsky was in the news for fellating Clinton, feminists were outraged. Their reasoning? Even though Lewinsky said many times she pursued Clinton and that the acts were completely consensual, the feminists say that she could not consent due to being helpless against her attraction to a man of great power. It shocks me to this day that feminists basically said that women are incapable of self control in certain circumstances.

Feminists, especially the #yesallwomen kind, think that every compliment is an assault. “You look hot in that outfit” is verbal assault in their minds. Hearing a wolf-whistle on the street is, to feminists, a precursor for sexual assault rather than some immature jerk being rude. They think that an older man gaping at the sudden appearance of an enormously sexually charged woman is a sign that he wants to rut with her regardless of her personality.

The unfortunate fact is that women are raped. A lot. They are sexually assaulted in breathtaking numbers. They are generally smaller and less able to fight back against an assault by a man. They go out jogging in a sports bra and shorts and get catcalled by men passing in cars. They are still sometimes called upon to engage in sexual favors for a promotion (or simply not losing their job). They have some very legitimate grievances and concerns. I just learned last week that a woman I know was raped by a client of hers in the course of her duties. The fact that she’s still doing the same job today is amazing.

I have no problems with any woman who stands up and says that she’s sick of being manhandled and harassed. I’m with her 100%. I am a flying buttress of support.

What makes me dislike feminism is their prescriptions for improvement. Their agenda will take us back into the sexual dark ages of courtly manners and Victorian era stodginess. They have set up such a minefield of restrictions, conditions, and legal protections that it’s amazing anyone is getting laid. And it’s only getting worse. Ministraw complained about “consent contracts” in one of her posts earlier. I can’t agree more. We’re headed for a situation in which the only way to have safe sex is with a condom in one hand and a pen in the other. But the fact is, it’s not working. In fact, while feminists are trying to control all of the variables of sexuality, the #yesallwomen movement shows that not much progress is being made in stemming the problems.

Feminism has become an anti-sex movement. They’ll never admit it, but they are. By treating all men as pigs with no self control they are demonizing half the populace (except gays, who have no interest in them). We have PSAs now that young boys have to sit through in the theater where they can see Obama and other hollywood stars implore them to not rape women, as if raping women is something that is present in every boy. Men are treated as creeps because they appreciate beauty without having to go through a ten hour crash course in that specific woman’s history and psychology.

So what is the answer? If not feminism’s minefield, what else can be instituted to make this a more pleasant society.

Glad you asked. Make society a sex-positive one!

1. The easiest change to make is to legalize prostitution. Not only that, but make it something you need to get licensed for. Taxed. Regular health checkups. Labor law protections. Unions. If you need hints, just go to Denmark or Germany. Look at how their red light districts run. If someone needs sexual gratification, there is an entire industry set up to sate it. A safe, regulated, taxed industry that protects the prostitutes.

2. Regularize societal acceptance of alternative sexual lifestyles like swinging, or open marriages, or polyamory. Make it okay to bring home the husband and the boyfriend for Thanksgiving. Monogamy is an enforced condition and not a human condition. We crave sexual novelty. We have the capacity to love more than one person with all of our hearts (just ask a parent of multiple children).

3. Repeal all nudity laws. There is no such thing as indecent exposure. It’s just flesh. Demystify the human body. Stop treating flesh as something so valuable that it must be hidden, or alternatively so damaging and horrible that it must be hidden. Nudity with no other action is harmless. If a man runs down the street with an erection flapping in the breeze, it’s just an erection, not toxic waste.

4. Teach children that sexuality is a wonderful thing to have. Much like everything else in life it needs to be used with maturity. Help the children attain that sexual maturity. Teach them from a young age about consent and respect for another person’s body. Teach that sexuality is a gift that can be given to another (or multiple others). It’s not a horrible burden or a damaging activity as long as all parties agree to participate. Teach about protection against sexual disease and unwanted pregnancy much like you’d teach them to look both ways before crossing the street.

5. Make rape about “sex without consent” again. There’s enough shades of gray in those three words. We don’t need any more gray. Make sexual assault about imposition of genitalia on another person’s body instead of just “viewing someone’s junk”. An erect penis pressed on a person’s buttocks in a deliberate way on a busy bus is sexual assault. Seeing someone’s penis while on the bus is not. If a person is masturbating in your view, it might be rude, but it’s not assault. If that person happens to be a man and he ejaculates onto you, then it is.

6. Stop hiding affection in the home. I’m not saying there should be no privacy. I’m saying that the parents should not hide the fact that they are sexual beings from their children. That love and sexuality is a wonderful part of being a couple. Physical contact in a sexual context is not something that is dirty or forbidden.

7. Stop judging anyone for the number of sexual partners they’ve had. Treat it as you would handshakes or friendly hugs. Don’t turn sex into a special class of “apex” experiences. We’re still holding on to the ideals of medieval morals that imply that sex is for procreation and thus can only be performed in a very specific kind of relationship under certain kinds of conditions. Birth control is cheap. Condoms are plentiful. Pregnancy is no longer an inevitable consequence. And a hymen is a piece of skin, not a bartering chip.

8. If a child is curious about their bodies or yours, don’t turn them away like it’s a verboten thing. To be sex-positive means that sex and sexual organs are just items on a continuum of human experience. Sex can be done in the context of deep and abiding love, or it can be done because it’s fun. Don’t put it, in of itself, on a pedestal without context.

There are probably dozens more. But the key to a pro-sex society is making sure that children are raised in an environment where sex is commonplace, everyday, available if needed (through a friend, a loved one, or if all else fails a prostitute), and most of all not this secret, hidden, dirty act that damages a person’s worth in society. If anyone wonders why I call myself a “philosophical pedophile”, it’s because I think that the only way to get to a pro-sex society is to raise a couple of generations of children in it, not because I have a particular sexual attraction to children.

This has got to be the stupidest fucking shit i have ever seen in my goddamn fucking life! Now i spent a hour debating this with myself and what my thoughts and opinion on this matter should be. Going topless is not a fucking social justice ideal! If you want to walk around with yer tits hanging out then go to a nudist resort or topless beach! But this dumb idea of going topless for a day to support gender equality is just fucking stupid! It has no merits, does not support the equality between males and females and does not help society grow or function any better!

There is a reason women wear bras and 90% has to do with the laws of physics and comfort! It has nothing to do with patriarchy and women being oppressed! Now if you are one of those grown women with the bust size of a 10 yr old Asian schoolgirl then by all means don’t wear a bra but keep a fucking shirt on! Just like no one wants to see a 85 yr old man with liver spots walking around with his shirt off, no one wants to see most women of any age, IN PUBLIC, with their shirts off!

The social justice warriors/advocates (SJWs) who support this garbage apparently do not understand why we have certain social norms. We have them because it helps society function with efficiency on a day to day basis. The reason we ask women to cover up is the same reason we ask men to cover up, to keep society flowing smoothly, to keep social conversation and decorum polite and decent, and most of all to keep people from distractions, and encouraging those with less common sense, morals, and sanity from acting out in negative ways!

I guess what really irks me with this Go Topless Day is that it doesn’t actually help the cause of gender equality, societal evolution, helping those in need, or even just making the world a better place. GTD is a exercise in futility which not only wastes time that could be spent truly helping people, but also shows how selfish and immature the so-called gender equality movement is. It seems that the gender equality movement or GEM is run by a bunch of 20 yr old party girls who are trying to make up for the fact that they were late bloomers in high school, instead of helping women have better life in this nation and across the world.

In the end i don’t think we’ll have as many women participate as the GEM hope. Too many people have common sense, and it seems the GEM wants to throw out common sense along with the bathwater and baby we call human civilization. And to what end? So you can feel equal to the guy walking down the street with his shirt off?

And finally i should say this. We as nudist should not get involved in this clusterfuck of a movement.

I have been out of America for years, now. I can honestly say that when you leave American society, your mind and emotions began to heal. Your actions and thoughts begin to correct themselves. When you don’t watch the bs on TV, eat fast food, or listen to brain dead music on the radio, slowly, your “negro” programming wears off. Your taste buds change. Even the smell of your skin.

I met a rasta a few years ago at a bar. We sat for a while, had a few drinks, and in the middle of the conversation, he told me that I had the mind of a white man.

What the hell!?

I’m the most militant, pro-black person I know. How could he say that? I was offended. Years later, I understand what he meant. Before I get into that, let’s talk about MOST black people in America.

Niggas love being niggas, So much so, that they strive to be REAL niggas. They take pride in saying,”I am a real nigga”. Really? That was your goal in life? To be a real nigga?

I hope my followers will read this with intelligence and discretion. I don’t agree with everything the author said but i agree with a lot of it.

I’ve not been contributing much lately. If you’re an SL regular, you’ll know that feeling. Sometimes RL simply swamps you. And ‘swamp’ is an appropriate word!

You might have read Ella’s postings on the storms that have battered the UK in recent weeks. I was ‘victim’ to them, although I thankfully got off much lighter than many others. Our garage, set on the hill to the side of our house, was flooded, and we did lose electricity to our house for several days and some of our ‘white goods’ (our freezer, washing machine and tumble drier) were all lost to the water, alongside much of the remainder of the contents of the garage…lawnmower, etc.

Anyway, life goes on.

The house is largely back to normal now, and SL time can return 🙂 Hoorah!

The only ‘upside’ to the flooding around us (we’ve not been affected this last, awful week) is…