On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:36:30 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile
<chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> Ian suggested that there should be a required frequency for progress
> events, and there was an issue over whether anything has to fire. The
> current draft requires that a loadstart fire, and some kind of event
> that signals an end-condition fire, but there is no requirement that a
> progress event fire in the middle, nor proposed frequency for this.
>
> I propose to leave the specification without further suggestions about
> frequency, and ths close these two issues
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/106
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/107
I would suggest that you explicitly mention that when the events are
dispatched is up to the specifications using the progress events, such as
the hypothetical XMLHttpRequest 2, the WHATWG HTML <video> element
proposal, etc.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>