Harrington, like many players already on the Warriors' roster, needs a good passing player to get him the ball. That is alright with Baron, if he plays alot that is, but otherwise he would be less effective. I like how Harrington scraps, that is a good trait but he is nothing more than anyone on the team. Dunleavy is crap but if he can not be traded then no to getting Harrington

HARRINGTON IS MORE PHYSICAL AND MORE ATHLETIC THAN DUNLEAVY. DUNLEAVY HAS SHOWN TO BE A DECENT PLAYERS AT TIMES BUT NOTHING MORE THAN A ROLE PLAYER...WHICH ULTIMATELY WILL PUT HIM ON THE BENCH UNTIL HE CAN PROVE OTHERWISE. HARRINGTON BRINGS THE SAVVY NASTY PLAYER WE'VE BEEN NEEDING.

murphy is slow as a slug. he can shoot which is nice. but he's no starter. good role player indeed.

"Losing is inevitably close to winning," Guber said. "They're inches apart. Drama. If you have drama, you've got a ticket to sell." "They're not real fans," Lacob said. "They don't have season tickets."

Anonymous wrote:HARRINGTON IS MORE PHYSICAL AND MORE ATHLETIC THAN DUNLEAVY. DUNLEAVY HAS SHOWN TO BE A DECENT PLAYERS AT TIMES BUT NOTHING MORE THAN A ROLE PLAYER...WHICH ULTIMATELY WILL PUT HIM ON THE BENCH UNTIL HE CAN PROVE OTHERWISE. HARRINGTON BRINGS THE SAVVY NASTY PLAYER WE'VE BEEN NEEDING.

True that Harrington is an upgrade from dun but dun would have to be traded or the salaries would mount up and possibly impede the signing of the young guys

Harrington would definitely be an upgrade at our 3 position. I know he played power forward in Atlanta but I doubt he would get the starting nod at that position w/ the warriors. If there aren't any more acquistions after supposedly acquiring Harrington --which I would doubt and dread--the starting 5 would look like this: