Caption The real
face of Secular Humanism. Secular Humanism is the Moral Relativism of
the New Age: Morality derived from Intellect leads to Barbarianism and
Enslavement under the false pretense of Enlightenment!
(http://tinyurl.com/superman-morality)

These
documentaries reveal an on going and concerted effort to subvert
Theism, mainly Islam and Christianity respectively. Since this letter
is addressed to Muslims, its focus is on Islam. However, a universal
truth which applies to all Theism regardless of religion, and which
appears to be a major impediment to the nihilism of the New World
Order, is that only Theism teaches man in absolute moral codes how to
overcome self-interests for higher moral cause; only Theism teaches
man how to break his bonds of servitude to fellow man. And that is
why the genuine practice of Theism and its absolute morality poses a
real impediment to Secular Humanism and World Government which depend
on moral relativism to promulgate their nihilistic agenda for the New
Age.

Moral
codes in Theism are indeed encased in the absolute semantic
strait-jacket so feared by all tyrants across space and time and
therefore, remain forever under attack and subversion. Islam, like
all Theistic religions, has already answered the question of bondage
to fellow man in showing the way to its effective severing. It is
even part of the cryptic formula, the Kalima, recited by the
adherent daily, without evidently understanding any of it:

Islam's
clear prescription of bowing in servitude only to the One God of
Truth is completely pre-conditioned upon first breaking the bonds of
servitude to all other gods of falsehoods. A simple substitution of
“God” with “Truth”, and “god”
with “falsehoods” including the worship of
“self-interests” and “society's gods” in the
above daily declaration of faith makes the all encompassing import
of Kalima self-evident.

As
noted by Brian Gerrish in his Lawful Rebellion talk, all other
major religious and ethnic populations in the West have become so
secularized in the Western culture that only Islam today remains the
effective impediment in its path – even though it is not much
of one, as seen by the subversion of the Muslims and their religion!
I quite agree with the introduction chapter by David Livingstone of
his book “Surrendering Islam – The subversion of Muslim
politics throughout history until the present day”.

What
Livingstone has perhaps missed in his zeal (I haven't read his entire
book), but which does not change his point about the subversion of
Islam today made in that chapter, is that the subversion of Islam
historically was started the day of 'Fatah Mecca', and not just by
the later British empire creating sects harmless to their own
imperial interests through Machiavellian cognitive infiltration. One
can easily judge for oneself which ones are the creation of imperial
psyops, and which ones have profited from their alien benefactors, by
simply looking at the stances of its founding pontiffs towards
British rule: who advocated obedience to the alien rulers by engaging
that most abused verse of the Holy Qur'an for political purposes,
verse 4:59, and went so far as to prohibit rebellion against the
colonizing foreign power which was in direct competition with Muslim
ruling states at the time?

The
logic of that declaration itself mandates this mental substitution
in the proclamation of Monotheism in order to prevent it from
degenerating into an absurdity. Islam, for its followers, is
anything but an absurdity. And yet, their facile understanding of it
directly reduces their practice of their lofty proclamation of
Monotheism to the absurdity of polytheism.

Silence
and apathy in the face of the ubiquitous spread of oppression and
falsehoods in our time, is akin to directly bowing in servitude
before the gods of tyranny. That silence and co-option permits
tyranny to spread unchecked becoming its de facto first-cause
enabler! Islam calls the allegiance to another superpower, or
bowing in servitude before other gods and idols, polytheism. The
abode of polytheists, the Holy Qur'an oft proclaims, is Jahanam.

Each
one of these “imperial Islam” creations still flourishes
today in some variation, and those born into them cannot distinguish
their pedigree anymore than any other longer running Muslim sect can.
Some sects have become important gate-keepers of Islam. Some have
even been given sanctuary in the Jewish state in Palestine in the
name of “freedom of religion”. These latter ones along
with those that advocate strict political neutrality or
apoliticalism, are presented to the world as the perfect model
of “moderate Islam". Their adherents remain among the most
peaceful and docile of all Muslim sects, indistinguishable in their
socialization characteristic of self-righteousness from any other
Muslim sect. So who can ever define who is a Muslim and who isn't?
Which is precisely why this can of worms is periodically
opened with utmost cunning for deriving political gain and
distracting the public mind.

As
an intellectual exercise however, all one has to do is simply apply
that aforementioned criteria and
ascertain for oneself the pedigree of one's own kaaba o
qibla. It constitutes a most
straightforward rejection criterion. It is not a complete acceptance
criterion however, for that is where “militant Islam” and
“warrior Islam” and “fanatic Islam” enter the
theatre of the absurd as the dialectical “imperial Islam”
equally in the service of empire. To appreciate just how difficult
that task of self-examination can be as a self-referential problem,
see Islam
and Knowledge vs. Socialization
where the practical wisdom of the guidance in the Holy Qur'an in its
own words is made apparent (http://tinyurl.com/Islam-Socialization).
One can only surmise that it has stayed a secret from the public mind
because no benefit of its common knowledge and understanding of its
meaning accrues to the exercise of political power that relies on
division and deceit to conquer.

A
dispassionate non-partisan study of recorded history itself shows
that Islam was viewed differently by different peoples, many of whom
converted overnight to the new religion of Arabia after a lifetime of
opposition to it. As one critically examines the most momentous of
times in the early days of Islam in the immediate aftermath of the
death of its Prophet, even when one glosses over the first 25 years
of tumultuous ad hoc political successions and rapid expansion of
territories through their own la mission civilisatrice, the
first dynastic imperial empire was really seeded by Abu Suffian.

The
mighty trader and leader of the Meccans, and the Prophet of Islam's
greatest antagonist, Abu Suffian, standing next to Ibn Abbas (the
Prophet's relative), on the mountains surrounding Mecca on the night
of 'Fatah Mecca' – following the conquest of Mecca
without bloodshed, and the Prophet's blanket proclamation of full
pardon without seeking any retribution for the ten years of imposed
military warfare by the Meccans upon the Muslims – and watching
the vast field of thousands of bonfires dotting the Muslim tents in
the valley below, realized that Islam potentially meant a lucrative
“empire”, and told Ibn Abbas so!

From
Abu Suffian, the harbinger of ill-begotten Muslim dynastic empires,
to Bernard Lewis, the harbinger of fabricated “clash of
civilizations”, spanning the gamut of those 14 centuries
and with all the Muslim empires which David Livingstone glorifyingly
mentions in-between, they all corrupted the Holy Qur'an's designated
“straight-path” of guidance in Islam, the
“sirat-e-mustaqeem” of Surah Al-Fatiha,
into “empire” – one way or another.

In today's
modernity, Islam is principally subverted in the same mold by
introducing “beneficial cognitive diversity”
(sic!) into that original singular formulation of “straight-path”.
See
Islam
and Knowledge vs. Socializationfor
details on how exactly it is accomplished today.

The
sophistication of Islam's subversion however that is evidently
running circles around the Muslim mind today, relies in the
employment of complex political theory called Hegelian
Dialectic
(http://tinyurl.com/Hegelian-Dialectic-PSYOPS):
invent two or more opposing and polarized ideologies (or
lies), say one entirely militant, and the other entirely spiritual,
and get them to clash by forcing people to choose between them while
perniciously harvesting each one in the greater service of “imperial
mobilization”. This is the underlying philosophy in the
“good Muslim” vs. “bad Muslim” dialectic, and
in Presidential statements like “either you are with us, or
you are with the terrorists”. The conflict that is
naturally seeded in any clash of the opposites is an opportunity for
birth-panging something far greater from the burnt ashes left
behind.

Tortuous
processes so unleashed upon the unsuspecting public can leave so much
confusion and chaos in its wake that as David Ben Gurion had
explained the purpose of seeding controlled chaos: “what
is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”.
And the Council on Foreign Relations proposed exactly that
same modus operandi to seed world government:

'In
short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built
from the bottom up, rather than from the top down. It will look like
a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion’ to use
William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run
around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will
accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.'

Watch
the fabrication of the Hegelian Dialectic of “militant Islam”
vs. “moderate Islam” in the following two videos. Both
are officially sponsored by the ruling establishment of the Hectoring
Hegemons. In the previous era, “militant Islam” was known
as “mujahadeen Islam” or “Brzezinski's Islam”.
These promulgate their respective asininity among the Muslims for a
purpose so diabolical, that it can only be fully comprehended in the
domains of political theory, game theory, employing dynamic systems
analysis, and not by studying each component separately.

The
face of “Brzezinski's Islam” – 'God is on your
side' “warrior Islam” loved by empire

Caption
Video Face of “Brzezinski's Islam” – Dr.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, America's National Security Advisor, selling the
Carter Doctrine to Afghan Mujahadeen on the Pak-Afghan Border:
“We know of their deep belief in God, and we are confident
that their struggle will succeed. That land over there, is yours,
you'll go back to it one day, because your fight will prevail, and
you'll have your homes and your mosques back again; because your
cause is right; God is on your side.” See Time Magazine,
Monday, Feb. 18, 1980 (http://tinyurl.com/6jqefz).

The
face of “moderate Islam” – “absurd Islam”
loved by empire

Caption
Video The face of “moderate Islam” – “absurd
Islam” waging war on terror against “militant
Islam” – featuring Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri, the
“Ambassador
of Peace”,
who issued the widely promulgated 600
page Fatwa on Terrorism
in the service of empire. BBC News Magazine excitedly reported it as
'A
fatwa they can work with?':
“An Islamic scholar turned up in London last week to deliver
a religious ruling denouncing terrorism in all its forms – but
what was it about him that made everyone sit up and listen? He’s
a man on a mission – a mission to state the obvious.”
This imperial “Islamic scholar” who issued a fatwa that
the empire could work with, was rewarded by empire for his due
diligence in not denouncing the superpower's own state sponsored
super terror when he denounced “terrorism in all its forms”,
with a place-setting
at the massa's table! An even more entertaining version of
Daniel Pipes' choice for “moderate Islam” with its
idiotic leader basking in the adulation of his even more idiotic
prostrating
fans,
is here
(search)

For
those unfamiliar with the name Daniel Pipes who loves “moderate
Islam”, he is the Zionist neo-con Jew in the United States of
America who was recommended by the President of United States no
less, George W. Bush Jr., to head the United States Institute of
Peace, and who has since 9/11 been working assiduously in 'Recruiting
Soldiers Against Radical Islam' claiming that: “It's not
a Clash of Civilizations, It's a Clash between the Civilized World
and Barbarians.” The good Pipes wants to “Defeat
radical Islam, strengthen moderate Islam.” See Open
Letter to Daniel Pipes,
April 03, 2007, inviting the fellow to World Court ala the fate meted
to vulgar propagandists for “Lebensraum” at Nuremberg
where all feigned protestation by the Nazi leadership was denied by
the chief prosecuting counsel for the United States, Justice Robert
H. Jackson, who coldly asserted that it was not victor's justice
but violation of international law “to goosestep the
Herrenvolk across international frontiers” under false
pretenses of false flag operation that was being punished
(http://tinyurl.com/Zahir-to-Daniel-Pipes-Invite
and http://tinyurl.com/Nuremberg-Elephant-in-Bedroom
).

This
sophisticated Machiavelli rooted in the Hegelian Dialectic process of
thesis vs. anti-thesis, is primarily the reason most Muslims, while
knowing that there is something wrong with the 'War on Terror' in
that the way the UK-US-EU imperial axis of evil is going about it
only creates more terror, remain perpetually confused by what is it
that the West really wants when it arbitrarily seems to support
opposites simultaneously. Inextricably caught between suicide bombers
and F-16s on the one hand, and between neo-colonialism and struggle
for daily bread on the other, most clutch at every strawman spun by
any detracting snake-oil salesman in town. Thus we see the
proliferation of conspiracy theories and plausible sounding false
explanations with the concomitant “beneficial cognitive
diversity” which these naturally engender, many of them
deliberately created as red herrings (see Anatomy
of Conspiracy Theory).
And our learned scholars, intellectuals, pious pulpits, news media,
politicians, et. al., all behave like prostitutes or brainless fools.
The reality behind that behavior is in fact this: that they have all
been co-opted; that they willingly lead the Newspeak chorus of
'war on terror', taliban, al-qaeeda, song and dance routine as the
House
Negroes
of the West. Our best minds at best have turned Native Informant.
Those whom we trust most betray us every day. So who is left to
explain Realityspeak to the Muslims? Who is not co-opted? Who can
dare call a spade a spade? None who is a somebody or who commands any
audience, big or small, for all those needed to make the public mind
by empire do make the public's mind in their respective spheres of
influence.

As
any knowledgeable person – who is not entirely deprived of
mental acuity to have largely become a glorified parrot of history,
often with imposing titles stamped upon his turban to lend
respectability before the masses – would straightforwardly
know, there are no empire’s in the religion of Islam itself.
Or, for that matter in any Theistic religion that is intended to be a
way of life for ordinary peoples. Only ‘religions’
of the elite have empires. And empires love such religions for the
masses. Interestingly, one can trivially spot the subversion of any
religion by simply observing the stances of its pontiffs to the
powers under which they flourish. This is true of the religion of
both the Christian and Muslim peoples throughout the ages. The
subversion of Theistic theologies to support empire is empirical. The
truth of these words is beyond doubt. It is self-evident.

Find
a word for “empire” for me in the Holy Qur’an as a
commandment to seek it – as distinct from finding it in the
history of the despotic Muslim rulers who did indeed build vast
dynastic empires with the help of their own doctrinal scholars, from
historians to narrators, no different than has been done since time
immemorial. There is no basis for such dynastic imperialism in the
Holy Qur’an. Indeed, Muslim civilizations, its arts, letters,
and sciences, all flourished during those first 700 years after the
Prophet of Islam. And these dominant Muslim civilizations also
defined the “modernity” of their epoch. But so have many
other civilizations of history including the present modernity of the
Americans – the Classical Greeks arguably flourished even more
than the Muslims, and for a lot longer period. But what does that
have to do with a religion? The Muslim rulers of all these Muslim
empires espoused as much moral gravitas as any other preceding or
succeeding rulers in recorded history, ancient and modern. Who can
deny that? The empirical fact that these Muslim empires were long
running family dynasties acquired by bloodshed, and often maintained
and perpetuated by the same sort of intrigues and bloodshed as
Shakespeare’s Henry the whatever, is not hidden from anyone,
except perhaps the Muslims.

Whereas,
Islam defines itself rather precisely in the Holy Qur'an, and it is
entirely about moral existence along a divinely defined path –
the “sirat-e-mustaqeem” noted in its very first
Chapter. Islam's unequivocally stated aim is to give mankind the
free-will of elevating itself to “Ashraf-ul-Makhlooq-aat”
– the best among all creations – while fully engaged in
the vicissitudes of this life as commanded in its Surah Asr.
And furthermore, to also be equally free to go the converse route, be
the worst of all creations. The twain, Islam the religion, and
Muslims (with their concomitant histories, narratives, cultures,
civilizations, and good and evil choices throughout history which has
ultimately led us to our present), are not the same thing. Only
Bernard Lewis is confused about it. He even opens his formidable
thesis titled: “Crisis of Islam – Holy War and UnHoly
Terror”, redefining “Islam” in precisely that
way (which evidently has also confused David Livingstone like many
other Muslims):

'It
is difficult to generalize about Islam. To begin with, the word
itself is commonly used with two related but distinct meanings, as
the equivalents both of Christianity, and Christendom. In the one
sense, it denotes a religion, as system of beliefs and worship; in
the other, the civilization that grew up and flourished under the
aegis of that religion. The word Islam thus denotes more than
fourteen centuries of history, a billion and a third people, and a
religious and cultural tradition of enormous diversity.' (page 1,
Bernard Lewis, Crisis of Islam)

That
Machiavellian redefinition of the word “Islam” is
deconstructed in Report
on the Mighty Wurlitzer - Architecture of Modern Propaganda for
Psychological Warfare.
Suffice it to note here that the Holy Qur'an has given a very precise
meaning to the word “Islam” to exclusively designate a
divine religion, a “deen” ( الْإِسْلَامَ
دِينًا ),
and not a civilization, not a people (for which a separate word
“Muslim” is used in the Holy Qur'an), and not an empire
(for which there is no word in the Holy Qur'an):

This
day have I perfected for you your religion and completed My favor
on you and chosen for you Islam as a religion; Holy Qur'an, Surah
Al-Maeda verse fragment 5:3

As
corrupted, subservient, powerless, and mentally colonized the two
billion Muslims are today despite our vast piety and full mosques,
and as convoluted and tortuous the understanding of Islam and what
passes as its history has become, still, according to Brian
Gerrish in his aforementioned video, Islam and Muslims are evidently
the single biggest social impediment to Secular Humanism!!

In other words,
Islam is the last wall to breach in order to usher in the full
1984-like Orwellian New World Order, and all the details of
enslavement which it portends, including, the elimination of
religion, of family, and the big-Brother big-State birthing and
owning the kids and raising them according to the new precepts of
Secular Humanism. (See What’s
the truth about modern medicine?,
http://tinyurl.com/Modern-Medicine
)

Hollywood movies
like Logan's Run and Aldous Huxley's fable A Brave New World, while
offering fun futuristic entertainment to the masses, have also been
psychologically priming the Western public to this state of voluntary
servitude wherein, a combination of Orwellian-Huxleyan worlds coupled
with full mind-body control and total social engineering will simply
make human revolt against the communist-style regimentation of the
oligarchy as unthinkable as the revolt of sheep against the habit of
mutton eating! That phraseology is borrowed from Bertrand Russell.
Aldous Huxley had (perhaps self-servingly) observed in his talk
at UC Berkeley in 1962, that eliciting such voluntary compliance from
the plebes has remained the focus of all social engineering
throughout the ages, “to get people actually to love
their servitude” in what could only be called the
“ultimate in malevolent revolution”:

'Today,
we are faced, I think, with the approach of what may be called the
ultimate revolution. The final revolution where man can act directly
on the mind-body of his fellows. Well needless to say, some kind of
direct action on human mind-bodies has been going on since the
beginning of time. But this has generally been of a violent nature.

The
techniques of terrorism have been known from time immemorial and
people have employed them with more or less ingenuity, sometimes with
the utmost crudity, sometimes with a good deal of skill acquired by a
process of trial and error, finding out what the best ways of using
torture, imprisonment, constraints of various kinds.

But,
as, I think it was Mettenif, said many years ago, you can do
everything with bayonets except sit on them! If you are going to
control any population for any length of time you must have some
measure of consent. It's exceedingly difficult to see how pure
terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly
long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an
element of persuasion. An element of getting people to consent to
what is happening to them.

Well,
it seems to me that the nature of the Ultimate Revolution with which
we are now faced is precisely this: that we are in process of
developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the
controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably always
will exist, to get people actually to love their servitude!

The
dystopic fables are piece-meal encroaching on reality space in
baby-steps. What stands in the path of fully realizing that dystopia?

The Nineteen
Eighty-four style full spectrum thought control paradigm being
enacted in the US--UK is portentous of what's to come to all of
Western civilization as a very visible force. Its signs are already
visible all around us, thus far only disguised as the “war on
terror”. See this article
“War
on Terror is not about Islamofascism – get with the agenda you
people”
for how it is perniciously making its way into the very fabric of
American and European society where the “terrorists” now
“look
Western”.
And with this latest Times
Square bombing plot,
I just heard (on May 07, 2010) Retired General Michael Hayden, the
terrorist “tickling”
specialist as the former director of the CIA, now with the Chertoff
group selling all those body-scanners to the United States, on MSNBC
News
describing the new Al-qaeeda threat. Soon new laws will be enacted or
enforced to deal with those. Already we are being conditioned
to obey orders by forcing us to take our shoes off at airports, and
compelling us to exhibit our anatomical perfections to the perps
manning the FAST scanners. Hollywood entertainment in “Total
Recall” had presaged full body scanners at airports with people
going through them without a second thought a full two decades ago
(Arnold Schwarzenegger, 1990).
And we are doing exactly that today. The RFID
implants
are next. Zbigniew Brzezinski, like his intellectual confrere
Aldous Huxley before him, had also predicted with matching chutzpah
in his seminal 1970 book Between Two Ages : America's Role in the
Technetronic Era, that:

'In
the technetronic society scientific and technical knowledge, in
addition to enhancing production capabilities, quickly spills over to
affect almost all aspects of life directly. Accordingly, both the
growing capacity for the instant calculation of the most complex
interactions and the increasing availability of biochemical means of
human control augment the potential scope of consciously chosen
direction, and thereby also the pressures to direct, to choose, and
to change.

Reliance
on these new techniques of calculation and communication enhances the
social importance of human intelligence and the immediate relevance
of learning. The need to integrate social change is heightened by the
increased ability to decipher the patterns of change; this in turn
increases the significance of basic assumptions concerning the nature
of man and the desirability of one or another form of social
organization. Science thereby intensifies rather than diminishes the
relevance of values, but it demands that they be cast in terms that
go beyond the more crude ideologies of the industrial age.' (page 10)

This re-casting
of values that “go beyond the more crude ideologies of the
industrial age” with “biochemical means of human control
[which] augment the potential scope of consciously chosen direction,”
is the incontrovertible flag of scientific totalitarianism we see
rapidly being unfurled today. While much less biochemical in its
present state of deployment than in Aldous Huxley's narrative (but
not for the want of it, for example see RFID
Implants),
it is no less coercive than in George Orwell's narrative. Brzezinski
went on to prognosticate the “trend” in his book,
and mind you with a foresight so uncannily accurate that he could
only have been sitting at the same oligarchic dinner tables when the
future that is already here today, was being planned into existence:

'In
the technetronic society the trend seems to be toward aggregating the
individual support of millions of unorganized citizens, who are
easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities, and
effectively exploiting the latest communication techniques to
manipulate emotions and control reason.

Reliance
on television—and hence the tendency to replace language with
imagery, which is international rather than national, and to include
war coverage or scenes of hunger in places as distant as, for
example, India—creates a somewhat more cosmopolitan, though
highly impressionistic, involvement in global affairs.' (page 11)

'Life
seems to lack cohesion as environment rapidly alters and human beings
become increasingly manipulable and malleable. Everything seems more
transitory and temporary: external reality more fluid than solid, the
human being more synthetic than authentic. Even our senses
perceive an entirely novel “reality”—one of our own
making but nevertheless, in terms of our sensations, quite “real.”

More
important, there is already widespread concern about the possibility
of biological and chemical tampering with what has until now been
considered the immutable essence of man. Human conduct, some argue,
can be predetermined and subjected to deliberate control. Man is
increasingly acquiring the capacity to determine the sex of his
children, to affect through drugs the extent of their intelligence,
and to modify and control their personalities. Speaking of a future
at most only decades away, an experimenter in intelligence control
asserted, “I foresee the time when we shall have the means
and therefore, inevitably, the temptation to manipulate the behaviour
and intellectual functioning of all the people through environmental
and biochemical manipulation of the brain.” ' (page 12)

'Another
threat, less overt but no less basic, confronts liberal democracy.
More directly linked to the impact of technology, it involves the
gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society. Such a
society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power
would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how.

Unhindered
by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not
hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern
techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under
close surveillance and control.' (page 97)

Zbigniew
Brzezinski's elite have already embarked on achieving their political
end “by using the latest modern techniques for
influencing public behavior and keeping society under close
surveillance and control” as witnessed today. The
culmination of this path of engineered social control, the “tampering
with what has until now been considered the immutable essence of man”
– a tortuous combination of Orwellian and Brave New World in
which “Human conduct [is] predetermined and subjected to
deliberate control” – will hit the developed West
the hardest.

Westerners
were the most used to living in free societies, and thus, by the
necessity of management of the masses by the controlling oligarchy,
had been given the illusions of freedom more than us in the East
where we were long conditioned to god, kings, and dictators. As
Goethe had observed: “None are more hopelessly enslaved
than those who falsely believe they are free”. I do
believe that mentally, as colonized the East has been physically, it
is has been far freer than the West. In the East, we don't trust our
elite, nor our government. In the West, most even refuse to believe
that there is even an elite which runs their elected governments, and
the vast majority “United We Stand” as is evident from
911.

The
Orwellian-Huxleyan social engineering presently in the works takes
away even those freedoms and those illusions – because, the
West is headed towards full-spectrum dominance, but not just of the
world, but of its peoples. I.e., totalitarianism the likes of which
have not been seen in history. The East is not targeted for such
mind-controlled totalitarianism, because, for one thing it is
difficult to implement. We are
too backwards as a scientifically controlled modernity. But not to
fear, we are a direct target of population reduction and all the rest
of Malthusian crap. See my deconstruction of NSSM-200,
and Bertrand Russell's “Impact
of Science on Society”.

But,
as is the truism of life, we all have to go some day of course. So,
arguably, at least let's live with a mind that isn't enslaved, even
though the body may be in chains and under the constant threat of
physical “shock and awe” from both the pirate suicide
bombers working for the emperor as patsies, and the emperor's drones
once again bringing us the white man's burden, its renewed la
mission civilisatrice.

The only place
left today to seek to make a home to raise one's family, appears to
be back in the East – yes, where we are under constant “shock
and awe”. The psychological attacks and sophisticated social
engineering transpiring in the West, coupled with its scientific
modernity, make surviving outside the “matrix” of thought
control a rather challenging if not outright impossible task in the
West. Crazy, isn't it? But crazy or not, choosing lesser of two evils
has become part of the calculus of life's decision making –
whatever the decision. Only fools and ignoramuses will ignore these
parameters though – for ignorance is surely bliss. Taking the
“blue-pill” does have its rewards. In the evergreen
Platonic
fable Simile of the Cave
depicted in the Hollywood movie Matrix, the “red-pill” is
the bitter pill of reality that is hard to swallow. (See dialog in
side bar)

“(Morpheus)
The matrix is everywhere, it is all around us. Even now in this very
room, you can see it when you look out your window, or when you turn
on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go
to church, when you pay your taxes. It is the world that has been
pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.

(Neo)
What truth?

(Morpheus)
That you are a slave Neo. Like everyone else you were born into
bondage, born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch.
A prison for your mind. Unfortunately no one can be told what the
matrix is. You have to see it for yourself. This is your last
chance. After this there is no turning back. You take the blue-pill,
the story ends, you wakeup in your bed and believe whatever you want
to believe. You take the red-pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I
show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Remember, all I am offering
is the truth, nothing more.” (Dialog from Matrix)

Before hearing
Brian Gerrish's evidence last year and reflecting upon the matter
ever since, I did not really believe Islam, the last of the great
Theistic religions, to be anything other than a diabolical instrument
of hegemony in the minds of hectoring hegemons in the pre and post
9/11 world – just like Communism of the USSR was before it was
dismantled. Something they brilliantly subverted to create a
boogieman for seeding “doctrinal motivation, intellectual
commitment, and patriotic gratification” in order to
sustain “Imperial mobilization” on Zbigniew
Brzezinski's Grand
Chessboard.
But something they had only utter contempt for.

Evidently,
they also find Islam to be a genuine impediment to achieving their
ultimate agenda of Secular Humanism. An impediment reaching outside
of their direct ability to eliminate or even control. An empire in
its own statecraft of hegemony never holds genuine impediments to its
primacy ever in contempt. Rather, it always deals with them as a real
enemy to subdue and dominate with “military-style
objectivity” and “avoidance of preconceived
value assumptions”. That amoral phraseology is from the
Report
from Iron Mountain.
The myriad Pentagon and think-tank documents such as the Joint
Vision 2020
and PNAC
which blithely strategize for “full spectrum dominance”,
afford a glimpse into that primacy mindset of empire.

Incredible!
Muslims today, despite our pathetic servile condition slaving under
the yoke of both mental and physical colonization, still potentially
have something that is perceived as a real obstruction by the
hectoring hegemons in their nihilist calculus of world government.

That alone is an
excitement I cannot contain! I have something they can't control nor
take away from me if I don't let them. Indeed, the pithy Surah
Al-Asr of Islam, is perhaps the most potent political-spiritual
weapon system in the Muslim possession if we can only learn to use it
effectively. It can straightforwardly achieve what Etienne de La
Boétie could not bring about in his “The
Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude”!

Islam's
prescription to end man's voluntary servitude to tyranny, one which
escaped Etienne de La Boétie's commonsensical Discourse, is
Jihad-un-nafs. Contrary to what many are led to believe
as just an “inner struggle” with no outward
manifestation, its true import is nothing less than revolutionary.
Jihad-un-nafs principally directs us in our inner struggles to break
our bonds of servitude to fellow man, to overcome our fears, apathy,
and silence. It is the reservoir from which saying 'No' to the
banality of evil springs from. It is the principal fount of
moral integrity, not ritual or selfish piety seeking Heaven.
Jihad-un-nafs enables us to deny our own petty as well as existential
self-interests when they conflict with morality and 'higher purpose'.

For, indeed, it
is only self-interests that trump morality. Self-interests co-opt us
and perpetually enslave us to any tyrant. Once such inner-struggle to
break free of self-interest is underway, when fears and allegiances
to falsehoods start melting away, when determination sets in which no
denigrating labels may circumvent, when the fear of the loss of
paycheck or confinement to state hospitality centers can no longer
preempt moral stance, then, and only then, doors automatically open
up, feet automatically start marching in the streets, mouths
automatically come un-stitched, and in the limit, one fearlessly
stands-up before the D9-Caterpillar bulldozer like Rachel Corrie, and
before the armies of tyrants like David before Goliath, Imam Hussein
before Yazeed, Rosa Parks before the white man's bus driver, Viva
Palestina before Israel, …. As the late George Bernard Shaw
had trenchantly observed: “We are made wise not by the
recollections of our past, but by the responsibility for our future.”
That responsibility becomes easier to shoulder when our
self-interests can no longer trump our moral callings. The forces
which preempt such wholesome goodness from percolating widely in
society are examined in The
Art and Science of Co-option
(http://tinyurl.com/Art-and-Science-of-Co-option).
Even the more resourceful ones bow before these existential forces as
can be seen in The
Aga Khan's Doctrine of Neutrality
(http://tinyurl.com/Doctrine-of-Neutrality).

Pious peoples
continually ask me what can they do as the justification for their
silence and apathy. As consummate victims of the banality of evil,
evidently they are so saddled with self-interests that they either
pretend to not see the clear path as they rather stay busy in their
various ritual acts of seeking Heaven instead of stand-up to
wrong-doings, or, suffer from a myopia characteristic of
self-absorption and/or indoctrination. Well, Heaven, if there
is one in the future, is surely denied to those who help create hell
on earth today – for, evil only flourishes when
well-intentioned people remain silent spectators and do nothing to
stop it. Often times they even directly collaborate in it as part of
their daily grind, collectively culminating in horrendous evils –
the banality of evil! Jewish
scholar Hannah
Arendt
had already explored that aspect of it in copious detail in the
context of the Third Reich in 1963. Just two score years later, I too
had dwelled upon it in my very first piece of public
writing
in the context of the Fourth one. For our purposes here however,
let's briefly examine this idea of apathy logically within the
Theistic beliefs of the Muslims themselves. I have examined
indoctrination and the reigning twisted epistemology which blinds one
to it elsewhere.

Do pious Muslims
filling their mosques in relative comforts while humanity everywhere
is oppressed at the altar of the lusts of the Hectoring Hegemons,
think that Jahanam will be the abode of only the few tyrants
and their soldiers of fame and fortune who directly inflicted the
evils? That their own souls are spotless since they stayed busy in
ritual piety waiting
for Allah?

If
it is true that tyrants flourish only with the assistance of the
majority who silently comply, and empiricism and history both lend
substantial evidence to this view (Etienne de La Boétie almost
500 years ago gave a compelling description of it in his Discourse
cited above), then, it logically follows that the first-cause
enablers of tyranny and its spread throughout the lands is the
silently spectating apathy of the peoples! Those who enable crimes
are no less culpable than those who commit crimes.

The
inescapable logic of this condemns the first-causers to be the
backbone fuel of the very inferno they so wish to escape with their
obsession with ritual piety while Creation burns. If the god whom
pious Muslims worship is a rational god, then this must be true –
for, only in courageously rising to break the bonds of servitude to
fellow man is Islam's “Ashraf-ul-Makhlooq-aat”
birth-panged into existence. If however, their god is irrational, as
many learned scholars proclaim when they attribute arbitrariness to
god's justice due to its self-proclaimed omnipotence, then is such a
god anything more than Zeus, the anthropomorphic god of ancient
Greece? Why fall in prostration to Zeus 5 times each day?

Even
Nuremberg, as fallible as that Military Tribunal was in its
administration of 'victor's justice', focussed on the first-cause
(self-servingly) ignoring the Allied bombings of civilian population
centers and dropping of atomic bombs. Nuremberg called the Nazi
aggression the first-cause of war, “the supreme
international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it
contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

When
the first-cause is always held more culpable even in our fallible
courts on earth, do Muslims think that in the Court of the Most
Just the first-cause enablers will get a free-ride?

Many
thinking Muslims presume that the god they worship is absolute in its
Justice. Otherwise, they feel that the whole notion of
Accountability on the Day of Judgment in the Hereafter
becomes meaningless gibberish, devoid of substance. Indeed, were that
not the case, God's Justice would be reduced to the whimsical moral
relativism that is already being thrust upon us in these times as
propositioned by a US Supreme Court Justice:

“Nothing
is more certain in modern society than the principle that there are
no absolutes, that a name, a phrases, a standard has meaning only
when associated with the considerations which give birth to
nomenclature. To those who would paralyze our Government in the face
of impending threat by encasing it in a semantic strait-jacket, we
must reply that all concepts are relative.” Justice
Vinson, U.S. Supreme Court, 1951

Moral
codes in Theism are indeed encased in the absolute semantic
strait-jacket so feared by all tyrants across space and time
and therefore, remain forever under attack and subversion. Islam,
like all Theistic religions, has already answered the question of
bondage to fellow man in showing the way to its effective severing.
It is even part of the cryptic formula, the Kalima, recited by
the adherent daily, without evidently understanding any of it: “La
ilaha ilallah” (Arabic: لا
إله إلا الله‎
)
– “there is no god but God”.

Islam's
clear prescription of bowing in servitude only to the One God of
Truth is completely pre-conditioned upon first breaking the
bonds of servitude to all other gods of falsehoods. A simple
substitution of “God” with “Truth”, and “god”
with “falsehoods” including the worship of
“self-interests” and “society's gods”, in the
above daily declaration of faith makes the all encompassing import of
Kalima self-evident. The logic of that declaration itself
mandates this mental substitution in the proclamation of Monotheism
in order to prevent it from degenerating into an absurdity. The Holy
Qur'an admonishes not to make a mockery of its teaching:

“That
this is indeed a Qur'an Most Honourable, In a Book well-guarded,
Which none shall touch but those who are clean: A Revelation from the
Lord of the Worlds. Is it such a Message that ye would hold in
light esteem?” Holy Qur'an, Surah Al-Waqia, 56:77-81

And
the Holy Qur'an unequivocally equates lies and falsehoods before
which one bows, in fear or in expectations, with false gods –
as commonsense would dictate:

Islam,
for its followers, is anything but an absurdity. They'd sooner die
than mock their religion. And yet, their facile understanding of it
directly reduces their practice of their lofty proclamation of
Monotheism to the absurdity of polytheism. Silence and apathy
in the face of the ubiquitous spread of oppression and falsehoods in
our time, is akin to directly bowing in servitude before the gods of
tyranny. That silence and co-option permits tyranny to spread
unchecked becoming its de facto first-cause enabler! Islam calls the
allegiance to another superpower, or bowing in servitude
before other gods, polytheism. The abode of polytheists, the
Holy Qur'an oft proclaims, is Jahanam (the metaphorical abode
in the Hereafter where accounts are to be settled for
creating, aiding and abetting, the hell on earth).

Q.E.D.

The
invitation to break bondage to all false gods and idols is the first
Abrahamic creed of Islam. Without it, there is no Islam – only
hypocritical pretensions. This Qur'anic similitude was well
understood by previous generations of Muslims. This is even evidenced
in the twentieth century poet-philosopher of Muslims, “Sir”
Muhammad Iqbal's*
attempts at liberating the Muslim umma from the shackles of
mental servitude. In Zarb-E-Kaleem, “Sir” Allama
Iqbal went on to most eloquently explain the meaning of the first
sentence of the Kalima: “there is no god but God”
(see famous poem below and footnote on “Sir” Allama Iqbal
at the end).

But
Muslims in our present age of Jahiliya have been deftly
indoctrinated into believing that polytheism is only about
worshiping the stone statues like the ones which inhabited the
Kaaba before the advent of Islam and its latter day variants,
both physical and abstract, seen among peoples of many faiths. Such
as, the Holy Trinity of the Christians (the Father, the Son, the Holy
Ghost), and the physical representations of the many gods of the
Hindus!

While
loudly decrying those gods of others, Muslims daily reaffirm their
own allegiance to all the false gods of pelf and power to advance
their own petty livelihood and ephemeral station. Indeed, most among
us bow before empire in full ablution!

“Sir”
Allama Iqbal's Poem in Zarb-E-Kaleem explains “there is no
god but God”

خودي
کا سر نہاں لا
الہ الا اللہ

خودي
ہے تيغ، فساں
لا الہ الا اللہ

Khudi
ka sirr-e-nihaaN La ilaha il Allah

khudi
hai tegh-e-fasaaN La ilaha il Allah

The
secret of the Self is hid, In words "No god but He alone".

The
Self is just a dull-edged sword, "No god but He," the
grinding stone.

يہ
دور اپنے براہيم
کي تلاش ميں ہے

صنم
کدہ ہے جہاں،
لا الہ الا اللہ

Yeh
daur apne 'Braaheem ki talaash mein hai

Sanam-kadah
hai jahaaN La ilaha il Allah

An
Abraham by the age is sought To break the idols of this Hall:

The
avowal of God's Oneness can Make all these idols headlong fall.

کيا
ہے تو نے متاع
غرور کا سودا

فريب
سود و زياں ،
لا الہ الا اللہ

Kiya
hai tu ne mataa'-e-gharoor ka sauda

fareb-e-sood-o-ziyaaN
! La ilaha il Allah

A
bargain you have struck for goods Of life, a step, that smacks
conceit,

All
save the Call "No god but He" Is merely fraught with fraud
and deceit.

All
those signature prostrations on the prayer-mat and the
circumambulations around the Kaaba leaving their indelible
mark of piety on the forehead of silence to the hell on earth, may
yet turn out to be the key evidence for the eternal purgatory of Hell
for polytheism in the Hereafter. For Islam to make any
rational sense at all, that is the only logic of justice which falls
out. And that logic has been reaffirmed in Surah Al-Asr of the Holy
Qur'an, in the second most misunderstood formulaic daily rehearsal by
Muslims: “Wa ta wa so bil haq” (Arabic
103:3 وَتَوَاصَوۡا
بِالۡحَقِّ
)
– “and those who strive for haq” (see
exposition of Surah
Al-Asr).
What is “haq” but another synonym for truth, justice –
the exact antithesis of silent collaboration with tyranny? 2 + 2
still equals only 4, even when the pious might insist upon 5!

It is surely the
most ironical of empirical paradoxes that it is not the theists by
and large, but the moral atheists who have courageously risen to
shoulder that “responsibility for our future”!
See Islam
and Knowledge vs. Socialization
for why, contrary to popular belief, even the atheist is not without
an inner moral compass (see Bertrand Russell's formulation cited
therein). Perhaps the pious living for the Hereafter in
obliviousness to the tyranny around them, might strive to learn from
the godless to value the here and the now more than Hereafter;
to endeavor to make the present less hellish in order to avoid it in
the Hereafter; to be more concerned with affairs of the here
than of the Hereafter; and in doing so perhaps come to learn
the real intent of Theism – “Wa
ta wa so bil haq” – from these moral
atheists!

It would be a
well-deserved divine irony if moral atheists who stood by their
fellow man without fear of hell or favor of heaven, come to
constitute the largest citizenry of any Heaven if God does
turn out to exist! They will end up with the last laugh in either
case! That’s all I can say to the pious silent bystanders of
modernity prostrating daily in ritual prayers. Once again, poet
laureate “Sir”
Allama Iqbal*,
the Indian Knight of The Round Table of the British Empire, said it a
bit more trenchantly in Bang-e-Dara to unveil the secret face
of Musalman's Islam (see his famous verse below, perhaps staring at
himself in the mirror).

East
or West, theist or atheist, being aware of the real challenges for
those who choose to not merely exist in a dream-state, I believe,
will prepare one to meet them more effectively. Self awareness
however is the key to the awareness of reality. Edward Bernays stated
the reality of modern social engineering bluntly in the opening
passage of his 1928 book titled Propaganda:
“We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes
formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”
The videos cited at the top of this letter empirically show that a
formidable totalitarian system is being engineered even as we speak,
and we are being convinced to accept it. Why are they succeeding? How
are they able to control our perceptions? I am afraid that most
Muslims remain unaware of all this concerted social engineering as
many continue to sing the empire's 'War on Terror' song against the
Islamofascists. Soon, Muslims might be surprised to find their own
religion banned in the West and their very identity as Muslim being
associated with “terrorism”. In a generation or two,
there won't be any overt Muslims. A far cry?

“Hussain
immigrated to the United States in 2003 and said his children had
once even asked if they could change their names due to the image of
their homeland in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks.”

The
headline screaming in today's
Dawn,
May 07, 2010, is even more revealing, even if perhaps mainly as
Mighty
Wurlitzer's
psyop to get others to follow suit:

“Pakistanis
pose as Indians after NY bomb scare: NEW YORK: Pakistani
merchants and job seekers in the United States, still reeling from
economic hardship since the Sept. 11 attacks of 2001, are posing as
Indians to avoid discrimination in the wake of the Times Square bomb
attempt.”

The
systematic demonization of Islam and Muslims is being conducted not
merely by the vile ignoramuses and the agents provocateurs in burning
the Holy Qur'an (see Hijacking
the word 'Islam' for Mantra Creation
), but officially by the State itself as evidenced in what the FBI is
teaching its agents even in the tenth year of 9/11 (see
Wired.com “FBI
Teaches Agents: 'Mainstream' Muslims Are 'Violent, Radical'”
and “7th-Century
Simpletons”,
September 14, 2011, and July 27, 2011,
respectively,cached).
And who is teaching this theology to the FBI? See the face of “Jews'
Islam” graph below that is being used for training the FBI.
The graph is self-evident and speaks to the identity of its authors
itself. Mother Jones magazine September/October
2011 issue
reports that the FBI has built a massive network of spies to
prevent another domestic attack (sic!), “The bureau now
maintains a roster of 15,000 spies, some paid as much as $100,000 per
case, many of them tasked with infiltrating Muslim communities in the
United States.” Teamed up with the University of
California-Berkeley's Investigative Reporting Program, the author of
that Mother Jones report
gallantly asked – perhaps to add a measure of chutzpah after
carefully omitting to challenge the core-axiom of the State that 9/11
was the work of Muslim terrorists – “But are they
busting terrorist plots—or leading them?”

The
concept that this synthetic 'war on terror' is being used as the
pretext for ushering in one-world government is completely absent in
these (yawn) narratives!

One
hopes that one might be forgiven if its authors remind one of the
three wise monkeys:

The
face of “useful idiot's Islam” – the “dissent
Islam”

Caption
The three wise monkeys: hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil
(image via wikipedia)

Perhaps
these otherwise brilliant academic pundits are poorly read only in
certain impermissible scholarship. Being “innocent of
knowledge” does appear to keep them gainfully employed
as “useful idiots” in the service of empire. Or, the ever
more likely case, the more respectable looking academic scholars and
award-winning journalists are the Mighty Wurlitzer's assets. This is
not just an opinion but actual public fact of the intelligence
apparatus of the United States planting its stooges and assets both
in the news media and in the academia. Which is what the term Mighty
Wurlitzer means --- please see the Report on Mighty Wurlitzer if one
is unfamiliar with the techniques of perception management. Whatever
the case, willfully ignorant useful idiots, or vulgar propagandists
who lie by omission, these dissent con-artists prima facie convey
both, the empire's opprobrium of “Militant Islam”
necessary to lend fuel to its “doctrinal motivation”, and
what the empire considers permissible dissent to corral the
recalcitrant public mind. Note how dissent is made permissible and
why it is necessary in democratic societies which constitutionally
permit dissent, for it also sells to the world and to their own
public the superiority of Western democracy which looks awfully good
in words:

By
retaining the axiom of “Militant Islam” as a
presupposition while critiquing the reactionary excesses of the
superpower in response to 9/11.

The
face of “Jews' Islam” – the “violent Islam”,
“militant Islam”, “radical Islam”,
“Clash of Civilizations Islam”, “Clash of
the Civilized World and Barbarians Islam”

Caption
Video face of “Jews' Islam” – “violent Islam”
As reported by Wired on September 14, 2011, an FBI training
presentation titled “Militancy Considerations” measures
the relationship between piety and violence among the texts of the
three Abrahamic faiths [ the god's chosen people obviously coming
out on top!!! ] As time goes on, the followers of the Torah and
the Bible move from “violent” to “non-violent.”
Not so for devotees of the Koran, whose “moderating process has
not happened.” The line representing violent behavior from
devout Muslims flatlines and continues outward, from 610 A.D. to
2010. In other words, religious Muslims have been and always will be
agents of aggression. Click on the graph to watch the FBI
Presentation Video artfully Hijacking Islam. See its full
deconstruction in FBI
Muslims and Militancy Considerations --- Heads up.
(Image source wired.com)

It's
a pretty slick game of full spectrum assault on all human senses,
cognitive as well as subliminal, which tickle both the primordial
fears and anxieties for self-preservation on the one hand, and
emotional attachments to the relevant political and religious
ideologies on the other for seeking safety. Hollywood has already
interjected that thought of banning the Holy Qur'an into Western
consciousness in the movie “V for Vendetta”. Soon –
that demand might actually be heard on mainstream television in the
many choruses of the Mighty Wurlitzer. It ought not to surprise
anyone if Muslim faces are presented as Hegelian counterpoint,
demanding a “moderate” Islam instead of banning the
Qur'an outright! (See Hijacking
the word 'Islam' for Mantra Creation).
Muslims have plenty of House Niggers and cultivated agents and assets
in the West who will be harvested for this purpose. (See FAQ:
What is an Intellectual Negro)
Such a demand simply cannot be plausibly made, or effectively
implemented, in the East! Judging from the riots that break out on
the “mere” cartooning of the Prophet of Islam – O
yes, we are surely slated for population reduction, the “useless
eaters” of humanity, while we apathetically wait for
Allah to change our condition:

“For his
sake there are angels following one another, before him and behind
him, who guard him by Allah's commandment; surely Allah does not
change the condition of a people until they change their own
condition; and when Allah intends evil to a people, there is no
averting it, and besides Him they have no protector.” (Holy
Qur’an, Surah Al-Ra'd, 13:11)

“That
which is left you by Allah is best for you, if ye (but) believed! but
I am not set over you to keep watch!” (Holy Qur’an,
Surah Hud, 11:86)

“Surely
We have shown him the way: he may be thankful or unthankful.”
(Holy Qur’an, Surah Al-insaan 76:3)

Evidently,
depending on whether or not one believes these verses are the God of
Islam's categorical admonishment to Muslims on how to conduct their
worldly affairs, the God of the Muslims says different from what a
lot of Muslims have been led to believe (vicariously and from the
pulpits) that Allah
chala raha hai (God is running the world)!

If
someone were to ask me, I'd suggest that obsessive immoral devils,
the Übermensch social Darwinians, are running the world.
Because, Allah has unequivocally proffered all human beings to stand
up to these devils; to not wait for Allah to change their condition;
to manage their own affairs with justice “Wa ta wa so bil
haq”, and with perseverance “Wa ta wa so
bis sabr”, if their life is not to be a total loss
despite all its material as well as “spiritual”
advancement. This kind of modern advancement, if it continues, will
spell the death knell for mankind as we once knew it as a new
totalitarian global police state emerges from the ashes of Muslim
dust. The side that belongs to the naturalists, meaning, the
predatory social Darwinian side, is thus far winning the battles on
all fronts. Both the religion of Islam and Muslims appear to be
impediments to its quest for total Secular Humanism. Muslims need to
prepare ourselves beyond our present commendable asininity despite it
plausibly being a nuisance speed bump to World Order. The
religion of Islam can take care of itself. Its Guardian has taken
explicit responsibility for it:

We
have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly
guard it (from corruption). (Holy Qur'an, Surah Al-Hijr 15:9)

Instead,
the God of Islam has given mankind a universal prescription plan, as
in Surah
Al-Asr, leaving it timelessly up to the believing man
and believing woman in every epoch to choose to fill it, or to not
fill it. It is stated pretty categorically. And time invariantly ---
meaning, the God of Islam swears by the passing time in the very
first verse of Surah Al-Asr, and one undeniable property of time is
time invariance. Time only marches forward, and past time cannot be
brought back. It is, in a sense, “lost”. There is an
opportunity cost to not following that prescription is what the Surah
is warning mankind in its own unique and incomparable style. The
veracity captured in these words of the Holy Qur'an is beyond doubt.
The matter is self-evident even for those who have no belief in the
supernatural or Divine origin of these words. Solon for instance, the
ancient Athenian lawmaker of the Hellenic Civilization a millennium
before Islam, asserted similar principles but in a much reduced
ambit. When asked which city he thought was well-governed, Solon
stated: “That city where those who have not been injured
take up the cause of one who has, and prosecute the case as earnestly
as if the wrong had been done to themselves.”

It
is the Muslim public that needs to defend itself by all means that
will be effective as the first victim of World Order, instead of
asininely waiting
for Allah, or the Last Days of Gog and Magog and the
arrival of Imam Mahdi in an Eschatology that is as absurd as the
Christians'. And for good reason. It is arguably derived from Pauline
Christianity and holy scribes laboring for Muslim empires to get the
public mind to accept its own servitude in the here, for the
promise of a better tomorrow in the hereafter. Muslims have
been conned by the Übermensch
who have persistently hijacked the pulpit of Islam since its
early rise as world power and world ruling state. They, virtually
without exception, singularly abused and distorted 4:59 to achieve
that aim. Muslims today, comfortable resting at the bottomless pit of
their trough, are still taught by their intellectuals, scholars,
pulpits, books after books, in poetry, in proverbs and parables, and
in their public as well as private education systems that “Islam's
domination” of the world for over 700 years, and its dynastic
empires lasting close to thirteen centuries, is something to gloat
over. The most idiotic are even encouraged to dream about bringing
the “good times” back. A pound of flesh has been
extracted for the privilege of that has-been gloat. We have
lost the meaning of the religion of Islam; kept the shell and thrown
away the fruit.

We
have no friends and helpers among the elite, among the pulpits, among
the establishments, and among the seasoned intellectuals. The rest of
the world will follow on our heels based on what happens to us.
Unfortunately, we are hoi polloi,the unwashed masses,
whose fate routinely hangs in the balance of pawn sacrifices on the
Grand Chessboard. If only we can alter that calculus to the delicate
balance of survival between two scorpions trapped in a bottle.
The social Darwinians can never be licked for Übermensch
shall always exist just as they have always existed from time
immemorial. At best they can be held in perpetual check. Since
the first order battle that is being waged for World Order by the
Übermensch is
with the power of intellect, it is a great equalizer if only we can
learn to use it. Its first baby-step is to actually try using it –
sort of like learning to ride a first bicycle; no amount of reading
the instruction manual, or getting a college degree, or a doctorate,
or acquiring a high position in the Technetronic society, can
create that skill. And it can even be virtually impossible to acquire
in the age of universal deceit when all the forces of social
engineering are arrayed against it. Especially when hear
no evil, speak no evil, and see no evil is amply
rewarded in both prestige and pecuniary gain on the one hand, and not
being conformant with the mantras du jour is punished on the other.
Minimally, one is socially and professionally outcast, and its fear
alone puts one in shackles of conformity.

So
now one understands the challenges on all fronts. The enemies in
front and those behind and sideways. We also understand that we are
slowly dying as humanity in a surfeit of deceit for the want of an
ounce of mental acuity to understand what is happening to us. The
fact that we display a total disdain for any moral courage to revolt
against what is happening to us, merely follows in its wake. The fact
that we have been house niggers for centuries, far longer than
the poor black slaves brought to the shores of America for cotton
picking in physical chains, always echoing the core axioms and
presuppositions of the ruling class in every epoch, equally follows.
Very soon, we shall surpass even the sheep who can never think of
revolting against the habit of mutton eating.

Are
there any He Mans among the Muslim men and women in the West
and the East to rise to these challenges before it is all a fait
accompli? It does not need to be many, but a tad more than zero to be
effective in becoming the first cause of its butterfly-effect. If we
stay at count zero, the superman among us winning our trust
will continue to harvest us for fodder. Muslims and non-Muslims
alike. It is that other fellow over there today... tomorrow it will
be you!

If
you got this far, thank you for reading.

– End
Letter –

Date
of Letter: Friday, May 07, 2010

Updated
Friday, April 17, 2015

About
The Author

The
author, an ordinary justice activist, formerly an ordinary engineer
in Silicon Valley, California (see engineering patents at
http://tinyurl.com/zahir-patents
), founded Project Humanbeingsfirst.org in the aftermath of 9/11. He
was, mercifully, most imperfectly educated in the United States of
America despite attending its elite schools on both coasts. This
might perhaps explain how he could escape the fate of
“likkha-parrha-jahils” (educated morons) mass produced in
its technetronic society with all his neurons still intact and
still firing on all cylinders. He is inspired by plain ordinary
people rising to extraordinary challenges of their time more than by
privileged and gifted people achieving extraordinary things. He chose
his byline to reflect that motivation: The Plebeian Antidote to
Hectoring Hegemons. Bio at http://zahirebrahim.org.
Email: humanbeingsfirst@gmail.com.
Verbatim reproduction license for all his work at
http://humanbeingsfirst.org/#Copyright.

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.