Maybe it’s just my twitter feed, filled as it is with skeptics and academics for whom sport — the opiate of masses — is of little interest to them. On the other hand, maybe the national pastimes of rampant pessimism and celebration of failure are just getting out of hand. Whatever the reason, I’m getting a little bit pissed off the constant knocking of the Olympics and LOCOG. I for one — though I’m sure I’m not alone — am really looking forward to the games; a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to host the greatest sporting festival in the world.

This week we have had several minor twitter storms over the Olympics, caused by musicians not being paid, chip-gate, the lack of a British real-ale for sale and the email sent to ticket holders outlining the horrific entrance rules which outlaw the taking of weapons, banners and large hats into the Olympic park. First up, the unpaid musicians; It’s a bit shitty, but I’d like to point out that the organisers are hardly holding a gun to the head of those musicians and making them play, those musicians, just like every punter are free to say, “Do you know what? These terms and conditions suck, I’m outta here.”

As for the entrance conditions, well these seem pretty sensible to me. Taking a large hat into the Olympic venue is a pretty inconsiderate thing to do given that no-one behind you will be able to see anything. Similarly the restrictions on what you can eat and drink inside the Olympic venues are no different to those at any Premier League football match or Cricket Test Match. You’re paying for a ticket to watch sport, not take an afternoon 15-course taster menu at The Ivy. Just like at any other sporting event, you will be able to accompany your sporting entertainment with a shitty selection of burgers, fizzy pop and pissy lager, and if you don’t like that you can take some sandwiches.

“But why couldn’t we ask an ethical, organic health food company to provide the food and drink for the games?” Well, because such a company doesn’t exist; certainly not a multi-national with the funds to match the usual corporate giants. Again, you do know you don’t have to do what advertisers tell you, right?

Then there are security issues. Sure the missiles on tower blocks are over-the-top. But, so too are nuclear-warheads in submarines, but that doesn’t mean that the deterrent arguments for Trident or Fred Wigg tower are invalid. And besides, all this appears to have been driven by the government rather than LOCOG. Similarly, the G4S security guards — a situation easily predicted by any Private Eye reader — whilst an undoubted fuck up, has been sorted by LOCOG’s contingency plan to have 3000 military personnel on standby. Why aren’t they being praised for having good contingency plans? Well, because the real issue here is money.

Money – the source of many an argument. There is no doubt that the Olympics are costing a lot of money. Surely therefore, every million spent by the corporates is a million saved for the taxpayer? Exactly how much public money spent will probably never be known, but it’s likely to be upwards of £10bn. This will be difficult to add up properly because there are grey areas in spending such as security (are government or LOCOG paying for those missiles and fighter jets?), and investments in infrastructure and transport, which will last long after the games and were probably a good idea anyway. Whatever the true figure, it’s a lot of money, especially in the current economic climate, but few people were predicting the current economic crisis in 2005 when the games were awarded, let alone in 2003 when the bid was submitted.

Don’t forget, of course, that the public balance sheet will have increased revenue generated by the games, though the increases in VAT receipts, tourist spend and general good-will towards the UK will be even harder to calculate than the cost of the games. I’m under no illusion though; we’ll still be running at a loss. But so what?

The Olympics are worth the money to enrich our lives with this sporting festival. I’ve no doubt there are plenty of people who disagree, they’re not sports fans. That’s perfectly ok, but the Olympics aren’t really for them. They’re for me and the millions of other sports fans in the country. I’m no fan of opera or experimental dance, but does that mean I think that we shouldn’t fund the arts council who fund much of these projects? No, because I recognise the cultural importance of a diverse society where the interests of people other than myself are met and funded by public purse. Just to put the money spent on The Olympics into perspective; despite severe cuts The Arts Council England have a £1.04bn budget for the next 3 years. Hosting an Olympic Games is not something that occurs everyday — The UK last hosted the games in 1948 — so we’re unlikely to host it again in most of our lifetimes, so we’ll have matched funding (and more)* for the arts by the time it comes around again.

In the meantime, relax, grab a Real Ale and healthy snack, sit back and watch the incredible sporting prowess on show, because that ultimately is what the Olympic Games is about.

* Yes, yes, I know sports funding will continue, etc. I just wanted to highlight that fact that quite a lot of money is spent on stuff that I’ll get no personal enjoyment from.

Five-and-a-half long years ago I got a job in Cardiff. I had just moved to Bath and academia being what it is ― with one or two employers per city ― I cast a fairly wide net in looking for a job. I got one in Cardiff. It was at the very limit of commute-a-bility. Just over an hour on the train. For about the first two years I used to tell people my commute was an hour. That was until the awful truth dawned on me that my door-to-door commute was twice that. Just over two hours.

If you follow me on twitter you’ll have an idea of how frequently individual journeys are late or cancelled or full and standing. If you’ve been with me since the start, you might also recall my previous blog in which I let off steam about First Great Western (FGW) when it really bothered me. I’ve mellowed a lot, if you can believe that. But I felt it was time to bring some of my train-travelling woes together in a blogpost again. Don’t worry I wont make a regular habit of it; there’s plenty of other places on the interwebs where you can find more regular commuter woes if that is your preferred brand of schadenfreude.

There are the obvious complaints about overcrowded trains, late trains and often late & overcrowded trains. There’s also the cost. Tickets are really fucking expensive. I spend more than £250 per month to travel a route of less than 50 miles. In my opinion a fair price would be around half that. The train companies attempt to wash their hands of any responsibility in the pricing of train tickets, particularly season tickets. Reminding us that these are regulated fares set by the government. Well successive governments have got this wrong and it’s getting wrong-er. Season ticket fares increase by more than inflation every year, meaning these fares are getting more and more expensive in real terms.

But it’s not just season tickets – I need to travel to Edinburgh this summer for a conference and the cheapest tickets are more than £250 – that’s booking four months in advance as we are told we have to do to secure the cheapest deals. If that’s a cheap deal I’d hate to see how much full whack is. Despite wanting to take the greenest possible method of transport I will instead have to fly, since Bristol-Edinburgh flights are almost a quarter of the train price. Madness.

Subsidised Railways

Why do season tickets go up by more than inflation every year? We’re told this is because investments need to be made in the railway. Right, agreed – it’s a Victorian infrastructure that has done incredibly well to last the best part of 200 years. I’ve heard politicians and members of the public say that the railways need to pay for themselves, that the public subsidy has to be removed entirely. This should be the subject of a politically-tinged blog post in its own right, and indeed at some point I may write one, but for now I shall add a quick thought on it; this aim is bollocks.

No-one in their right mind would suggest that road users should pay a fair price for using roads. In fact, a policy of fair road-pricing would probably kill any election campaign stone dead; and quite right too. Roads are an essential part of the infrastructure of this country. They’re essential for business to flourish and for most people to go about their lives without getting on a horse. But so are Railways. The argument that only those that use the railways should pay for them is absurd. No one suggests that they shouldn’t pay for hospitals and schools because they’re not ill or don’t have children. Nor do they suggest that only those whose houses are on fire should pay for the fire brigade. These are vital public services for a modern, happy, safe and productive society. But no, apparently only those that use the railways should pay for them. This is despite railways being much cheaper than roads, which, even with soaring fuel taxes, still command a larger subsidy than railways.

Faceless Corporation

Anyway, back to the faceless corporate bastards who are my Train operator of no choice; First Great Fucking Western. I should give them some credit; their services have improved a lot since they first took over the Wessex franchise. But frankly they were barely offering a service at all back then. But at their core they’re still money grabbing bastards who don’t give a shit about their customers. As a regular commuter I am hugely taken for granted. They take my extortionate fare and offer almost nothing in return.

For example the FGW twitter feed to answer passenger queries is only manned from 8 till 4, when the majority of commuters are already at work and before they leave for home. The cheap deals you see advertised, are not useful to me as a regular commuter. This year FGW made a big deal about how they’d frozen advanced fares, whilst the cost of season tickets increased by 6%. Thanks for rewarding my loyal custom! Those advanced tickets come with seat reservations, my ticket does not. So when the train is crammed with students with their cheap tickets going home for the weekend, it is season ticket holders ― who have paid more for their tickets ― who have to stand. Nice. When a service is severely delayed by more than an hour ― which happens more often than I care to remember ― those whose tickets have cost a fraction of mine are offered a refund. Season ticket holders on these services can go fuck themselves.

Targets & Triggers

Instead season ticket holders only get a refund based on performance figures. FGW, like all train companies have two figures against which their performance is measured. They have a target, and a trigger. For my route to work the target is 92% of trains run on time, whilst the trigger value is several percent lower at 89%. They’re already given magic goalposts which mean that arriving up to 10 minutes late doesn’t actually count as late. Whilst, if you, the passenger are only 30 seconds early for your train, and “the doors are already locked ready for departure” then tough shit; you’re late.

Given they have this erroneous definition of “late” on their side, why isn’t the target to run 100% of services on time? Would you have a have an operation in a hospital that only targeted success in 92% of operations? If that’s a little bit extreme, consider; would you buy a pizza from a company that only aimed for 9 out of 10 of its pizzas to meet quality control standards? No, neither would I, there’s an 8% chance you’ll end up eating broken glass.

We all understand that mistakes happen and things don’t always go to plan, but in no other industry could a company survive when it only targeted 92% of its products to pass quality control. But the railway industry can survive because regular commuters have to turn up and pay their money no matter what manky cold pizza is served up. I asked FGW why the target wasn’t 100%. They said;

the target value is based on expected levels of performance each 4 weekly period irrespective of the cause of delay

Any idea what that means? No, me neither. But it is staggering that not even lip-service is paid to the notion that they aim to run all their trains on time. So, do FGW use the target as their “target”? Fuck no. It gets worse.

Season ticket holders don’t actually receive a discount if the target is missed. They only receive a 5% discount when the rolling annual average drops below the lower trigger value. I asked FGW what happened if the miss the target. They said;

The target is used in the calculation of the compensation arrangements as explained above and First Great Western pays out to customers under the terms of its Passengers Charter

Which is wrong, since as the Passenger Charter clearly outlines the discount applies when the trigger is missed, not the target. As far as I can tell, if the target is missed then absolutely fucking nothing happens, it is a completely pointless number. Is it any wonder that half of FGW performance targets are missed but their triggers are not? They’re using the trigger as their target in order to not incur any financial penalty.

So, to summarise this situation for the commuter; only if more than 11% of ALL services over A WHOLE YEAR are late ― including the quiet evening and middle of the day services which commuters don’t use ― do we get a 5% discount. 11% late = 5% discount. Does that sound fair? And that is irrespective of the length of the delay; I’ve been on several services more than 2 hours late in the last 6 months, for which no pro rata refund was forthcoming. Meanwhile the occasional traveller, who has paid less for their ticket, is sitting in a guaranteed seat, gets a full refund if their journey is delayed by an hour. Basically, commuters are a guaranteed source of income which rises above inflation every year, swelling the profits of this faceless corporation irrespective of the quality of the service.

Customer Service

All train companies are fairly similar in most of these regards. I have friends and twitter followees who experience similar problems all over the country. Most other train companies do at least pretend to treat the cash cow, sorry, I mean season ticket holders with some respect. Some train operators give their season ticket holders “perks” such as free network-wide travel at weekends, discounts on other services, cheap kids tickets and cheap weekend first class upgrades. Yet the only “perks” FGW have ever offered me are free first class travel at weekend on my season ticket route. Three problems with this; a) They’ve now withdrawn this offer, b) there is no first class on my route and c) I don’t want to go to fucking work at the weekend.

But look at it from a business perspective – all of these perks would cost money to give away. So what’s the point? In a proper market they would have to offer these perks otherwise commuters would take their business elsewhere. But this isn’t a proper market. There is no alternative.

And that surely is the final and most definitive argument as to why the railways are a public service. The simple fact is that commuters have no choice but to use it and there is only one company providing the service. Private corporations should not be allowed to use a public service to line the pockets of their executives and shareholders at the expense of commuters.

Thanks to the sterling work of Jo on the fgw twitter feed in relentlessly badgering her paymasters, the fgw twitter feed is now manned during all commuting hours.

FGW are extremely lucky that the majority of their ground troops like Jo are incredibly diligent but the organisation is not fit to run public services. Season tickets are still expensive and will go up by 6% in January despite protestations that nothing has been decided yet. They still don’t give shit about their captive market and the trains are still often late.