If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Chris Henry a Bengal again?

When this topic was brought up before, I stated that I really wish Chris Henry turns his life around and finds success in the NFL, just not with the Bengals. Now it appears he will be back with the Bengals.

Re: Chris Henry a Bengal again?

Originally Posted by SteelTorch

Washington? That's a laugh. Come on, even you have to admit Henry is better than Washington.

Miller? Most definitely. He's a pro-bowl calibur TE who never gets any love.

If you compare Washington and Henry's number for 2006 and 2007 (Combined), Washington had more yards, more receptions and only 2 less TD's than Henry (Their Yards Per Average is about the same as well). It's great that Henry does well ever so often when he's not suspended but he is not a pro bowl receiver.

There are a lot of players in the NFL with "Pro Bowl" talent, but unless you can consistently get it done you are not a pro bowl player.

So like I said if Henry is a pro bowl receiver than so is Washington. IF Henry can ever show consistency than I will concede the argument, but do you want to take that bet on Henry?

Re: Chris Henry a Bengal again?

Washington? That's a laugh. Come on, even you have to admit Henry is better than Washington.

Miller? Most definitely. He's a pro-bowl calibur TE who never gets any love.

If you compare Washington and Henry's number for 2006 and 2007 (Combined), Washington had more yards, more receptions and only 2 less TD's than Henry (Their Yards Per Average is about the same as well). It's great that Henry does well ever so often when he's not suspended but he is not a pro bowl receiver.

There are a lot of players in the NFL with "Pro Bowl" talent, but unless you can consistently get it done you are not a pro bowl player.

So like I said if Henry is a pro bowl receiver than so is Washington. IF Henry can ever show consistency than I will concede the argument, but do you want to take that bet on Henry?

Hmm...I can't seem to find Henry's stats on the NFL website. But I'll take your word for it.

I guess I just assumed the idea because I'm so used to Steelers fans ragging on Washington and Bengals fans hyping Henry.

Re: Chris Henry a Bengal again?

Hmm...I can't seem to find Henry's stats on the NFL website. But I'll take your word for it.

I guess I just assumed the idea because I'm so used to Steelers fans ragging on Washington and Bengals fans hyping Henry.

And no, stats still aren't everything. Shut up.

Try googling "Chris Henry nfl.com". That will bring up his player card.

And stats aren't everything but calling a player who can't put up better numbers than Nate Washington a pro bowl receiver is laughable...

No, I agree. I shouldn't have called CH pro-bowl in the first place. (I was just using a generalized statement to make a point)

And I only said that last part because to admit that another player is better based on stats alone violates a personal code of mine. It'd be the same as JFF or sls admitting that fewer attempts does not equal better performance. My head would probably explode if I did.