Google Reportedly to Enter U.S Mobile Service Provider Market

Google reportedly is considering becoming a full-fledged mobile service provider in the U.S. market, entering the market as a mobile virtual network operator. The rumor is not new. Google has been looking at becoming a mobile ISP for some time.Google might arguably have been motivated to launch Google Fiber to create widespread pressure on other leading Internet service providers to up their speeds. The move into mobile likely has several strategic drivers. Google has to transition to a new role in mobility as the value of its traditional search business is pressured by mobile alternatives for its traditional search-driven advertising business. That might account for the move into mobile operating systems, devices and apps. But Google also benefits from lower Internet access prices, and might believe its own entry could help drive down mobile Internet access price.Following Google's launch of Google Fiber, and its $1 billion investment in SpaceX to support the creation of a huge fleet of low earth orbit satellites to provide Internet access, the move would highlight the increasingly porous boundaries between Internet ecosystem providers, with most of the move into adjacenies happening on the part of application providers.That is characteristic of newly-competitive markets and also of mature markets, as contestants either move to secure adjacencies. Sometimes that is to enhance the core value of the core role, and sometimes is driven by a need to create new revenue streams that compensate for revenue losses in the core business. The boundaries between ecosystem participants tend to become more porous as competition increases. That is why app providers become access providers, or app proviers become device suppliers. In other cases, device suppliers become app providers. In other cases video content suppliers become voice and data providers, while voice and data providers become video entertainment suppliers. We sometimes forget that for the better part of two decades, Internet service providers have worried that firms such as Google, Facebook or Amazon might beome access service providers.That fear already has proven justified. Google Voice, then Google Fiber, and now perhaps Google mobile are initiatives undertaken by Google to directly compete with former partners in the ecosystem, even if the partnerships are functional, and not strictly based on contractural relationships.

Popular posts from this blog

You can see where this is going. Younger users text more than they talk, and though today's users 25 and above still talk more than they text, the usage pattern is uniform: younger age cohorts text more than older age cohorts.

So as each age cohort advances, one might predict that texting behavior will grow over time. How much it grows is the only real question.

Users 18 or younger actually"talk" about as much as users 55 to 64. One suspects an awful lot of "voice" activity is of the coordination and collaboration sort, so that younger and mid-life workers might be in work groups that require more coordination than workers 55 to 64.

By now, telecom executives are well aware of the “disruption” market strategy, whereby new entrants do not so much try and “take market share” as they attempt to literally destroy existing markets and recreate them. Skype and VoIP provider one example. The “Free” services run by Illiad provide other examples. Most recently, we have seen Reliance Jio disrupting the economics of the mobile market in India, offering free voice in a market where voice drives service provider revenues. “Free” is a difficult price point in most markets. But free voice forever is among the pricing and packaging foundations for Reliance Jio’s fierce attack on India’s mobile market structure. “Free voice” does not only lead to Jio taking market share, but reshapes the market, destroying the foundation of its competitor business models. At the same time, Jio hopes to become the leader in the new market, driven by mobile data, with far-higher usage and subscribership, and vastly-lower prices. source: GSMADisruption…

“Take the package” (early retirement) quipped Tony Mosley, Ocean Specialists director of business development, after a review of major trends in the global telecom business at the latest PTC Academy program in Bangkok, Thailand.

Mosley's playful retort came just before students developed a list of key challenges they would face as new CEOs of their own retail businesses.

The work teams came up with a list of six major issues they would have to confront: Margin compression Regulation Over the top services Differentiation Spectrum Convergence As part of the three-day program, students (mid-career telecom professionals) are exposed to the business challenges leaders of businesses confront, and how they work to overcome those obstacles.

As always is the case, there was debate about whether it is possible to “move up the stack,” adding value and perhaps occupying new niches in the business ecosystem, to boost revenue and raise margins. At the concluding session, students were immersed in thinking…

Gary Kim has been a communications industry analyst and journalist for more than 25 years, and currently works mostly as a content developer (marketing copy, white papers, applied research, conference and blog content).

He speaks often at industry events, has written one book and a half dozen major market studies and 14,000 articles.

His work is noted for its examination of business model issues, especially wireless and mobile.

He recently founded the Spectrum Futures conference for the Pacific Telecommunications Council.

He was cited as a global "Power Mobile Influencer" by Forbes; ranked second in the world for strategic coverage of the mobile business.

He is a member of Mensa, the international organization for people with IQs in the top 2 percent.