How Tourism Affects China's Current Account Surplus

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Thinkstock/Domus

China has been a net lender to the rest of the world for many years. However, the relative size of this current account surplus has declined significantly from its peak in 2007. A big factor behind the decline? A rise in Chinese tourism.

The Rise and Fall of China’s Current Account Surplus

Since 2000, China has been running a current account surplus. It reached a high of 10 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2007 before declining to 1.8 percent in 2011. It has remained relatively stable since then and was about 3 percent of GDP in 2015.

Santacreu said the current account comprises three main categories:

Trade balance, or net earnings on exports of goods and services minus payments on imports of goods and services

Net income to foreign factors, such as compensation of employees and investment income

Transfers, such as remittances and donations

She said that the main factor in the smaller current account surplus has been a decline in China’s trade surplus. The trade surplus rose to a high of around 9 percent of GDP in 2007 and was 3.5 percent of GDP in 2015, almost mirroring the rise and fall of the current account surplus.

Goods vs. Services

Santacreu explained that this decline in China’s trade surplus has been driven by both a decline in the surplus of traded goods and an increase in the deficit of traded services. She noted, however, that the surplus of traded goods has increased again since 2011, while the deficit of traded services has become more pronounced.

“Interestingly, trade in services was roughly balanced between 2000 and 2007 and later became a deficit, reaching around –1.7 percent of GDP by 2015,” Santacreu noted. “Thus, even though the value of China’s exported goods has exceeded the costs of its imports, China has been importing more services than it has been exporting.”

She added, “Even more interesting is the fact that the increase in China’s services deficit has prevented its current account surplus from rising despite the increased trade surplus in goods.”

The Effect of Chinese Tourism

Santacreu did a deeper dive into the composition of China’s trade in services as a percentage of GDP. She found that “China’s increasing services deficit has been driven mainly by overseas tourism-related consumption.” (For a figure showing trends in services categories as a percentage of GDP, as well as how travel compared with other categories, see the Economic Synopses essay “The Rise in Chinese Tourism and Its Effects on the Balance of Payments.”)

She cited a recent report that showed how the increased tourism has been fueled by two main population groups in China: millennials and the growing middle class.

“On the one hand, young people travel for exposure to overseas experiences,” Santacreu noted. “On the other hand, Chinese travel for shopping, which accounted for 30 percent of overseas Chinese spending in 2015.”

What Might Affect the Trend?

She concluded, “Overall, the increasing trade deficit in services, spurred mainly by the rise in tourism, seems to be an important factor in the recent trend in China’s current account. As a result, the current account surplus is increasing only slightly despite a larger increase in net exported goods in recent years.”

This trend could be affected by exchange rate fluctuations that make it more costly to travel, she said.

“For instance, a depreciation of the yuan could slow the increase in the travel services deficit while concurrently increasing the earnings in exports of goods—all of which could generate a larger current account surplus,” Santacreu explained.

Previous Post

Next Post

Commenting Policy: We encourage comments and discussions on our posts, even those that disagree with conclusions, if they are done in a respectful and
courteous manner. All comments posted to our blog go through a moderator, so they won't appear immediately after being submitted.
We reserve the right to remove or not publish inappropriate comments. This includes, but is not limited to, comments that are:

Vulgar, obscene, profane or otherwise disrespectful or discourteous

For commercial use, including spam

Threatening, harassing or constituting personal attacks

Violating copyright or otherwise infringing on third-party rights

Off-topic or significantly political

The St. Louis Fed will only respond to comments if we are clarifying a point. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters,
so please edit your thinking before posting. While you will retain all of your ownership rights in any comment you submit, posting
comments means you grant the St. Louis Fed the royalty-free right, in perpetuity, to use, reproduce, distribute, alter and/or display them, and
the St. Louis Fed will be free to use any ideas, concepts, artwork, inventions, developments, suggestions or techniques embodied in your comments
for any purpose whatsoever, with or without attribution, and without compensation to you. You will also waive all moral rights you may
have in any comment you submit.

The St. Louis Fed uses Disqus software for the comment functionality on this blog.
You can read the Disqus privacy policy. Disqus uses
cookies and third party cookies. To learn more about these cookies and how to disable them,
please see this article.

About the Blog

The St. Louis Fed On the Economy blog features relevant commentary, analysis, research and data from our economists and other St. Louis Fed experts.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or of the Federal Reserve System.

Subscribe to
On the Economy

Get notified when new content is available on our On the Economy blog.