and depended on in where it would also affect certain other countries, Japan? Philipines? Vietnam?

hoe much inland? and in which province the "predicted" new tsunami will hit?

9.5 would mean the biggest earthquake ever recorded, even bigger than the Indonesian one.

bah

Interesting update though:

10,000 chinese troops have just been rushed to a massive dam 5 km north of one of the cities hit by the quake because 3 huge cracks have been spotted
in the dam, and there are fears it is about to burst!!

I wonder if this could be the 'Tsunami' the OP's friend 'predicted'`???

Haha, excellent point lucid lunacy. How in the world would a soldier benefit this situation? It needs to be fixed not protected...oh maybe that's
why! Maybe they fear a possible attack before unannounced engineers handle the situation!

Have you guys ever the video footage of how the Chinese repair dams? LOL there is a video from years ago where they basically order PLA troops into
the breach with bamboo sticks to slow the flow of water until they get it stopped. I'll try to find the link to the video and post back here!

Sorry, I meant China People Liberation Army. The title of the video is 'China PLA mobilized 300,000 people'

There is a better, full length video out there somewhere documenting how they fixed the breach shown in the youtube video but I couldn't find it. I
actually watched it ages ago in a management subject at university illustrating teamwork strategies and it has always stuck with me

So hang on, are you trying to say that the chinese use soldiers to fix the dam with bamboo sticks rather than engineers? Yeah that just sounds
absurd.

I have a different question though. There's rumor that California will be struck with a megaquake. What are the possibilities that 2 quakes hit, this
predicted Chinese bound one and the other Cali bound on? I just can't see 2 earthquakes hitting two regions of the world around the same time (the
cali one is supposedly coming June-july if i'm not mistaken).

Anyway, in regards to the thread, I was interested to see if there was an article in the magazine devoted to this prediction. I couldn't find one in
what was available for veiwing, or I missed it. I am wondering if there is something in the magazine about this, how the prediction would be handled
at a later date if it turns out not to be accurate, or for that matter if it is?

You mentioned the person who made the prediction has a good percentage of accuracy. Have you published the predictions in the magazine in the
past?

Well, I suppose so, I mean after all, the way it was presented was so that it would be out there in case it came true, or that is what Nexusmagazine
implied, which stumped me, because there was no mention of it being offered as a way to save lives. Cha Ching, is what I thought to myself from the
opening post just based on the user name.

Something this ground shaking (pun intended) should be in the MSM, or shouldn't it? I guess only Nexusmagazine and a few government officials are
privy!

Yes, a very slick way to sell a few rags, in my opinion!

The middle of June (or anytime in June) is still a ways off. Just imagine how many subscriptions might be sold before then........LOL!

Originally posted by masqua
Allow me, please, to repeat my earlier statement and ask that the topic of this thread (a prediction of a massive earthquake off the coast of China)
be the focus of any further posts.

Ok, here is my take on the topic. There will be no massive earthquake off of the coast of China in June. There are no definable sources for this
prediction. There is no history of valid predictions from this source. There is not a single piece of evidence to show that this precognitive seer has
any positive track record of making accurate predictions. If anything there is a long track record of predictions in this forum *not* coming true. The
only thing that would compel any rational thinker that this prediction is going to happen is a desire to believe. Wanting something to be true does
not make it true.

"Deny Ignorance" folks, remember? Who can you trust? No one! Everyone? Think!

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.