Seth Abramson. Following up with Proof of Conspiracy. And it's scaring him.

I'm writing the sequel to PROOF OF COLLUSION, and what I'm researching and writing is shocking and terrifying me even more than PROOF OF COLLUSION.

The book's working title is PROOF OF CONSPIRACY.

If PROOF OF CONSPIRACY is a book that'd interest you, I hope you'll retweet this.

2/ As the subject of PROOF OF CONSPIRACY is pre-/post-election multi-state collusion (Trump-Russia-Saudi Arabia-UAE-Egypt-Israel), I'm building a timeline of events only lightly reported here or exclusively reported in foreign media. This timeline creates...harrowing revelations.

3/ There are also events in the book that were lightly reported even in *foreign* media, meaning there's been no effort to link them to the broader Trump-Russia narrative. What I'm saying is, what we thought was the whole (public) story on Trump-Russia is 33% of a bigger picture.

4/ I keep saying that as a former criminal defense lawyer and investigator I'm accustomed to even solid "theories of a case" producing some seemingly contrary evidence. This...isn't that. Everything I find is inculpatory. *Everything*. I've never seen anything like it in my life.

5/ I've done the deepest dive into George Nader's life that I think anyone has—reading scores of articles from media around the world. And *everything's worse* than I imagined. The only thing that keeps me on course is knowing that Nader has been forced to cooperate with Mueller.

7/ And apparently I need to say this sometimes, as people do "forget": I love my country and I want to be wrong about all of this. I want to find contrary evidence. I want nothing bad to have happened. It'd be better for America. Those just aren't the facts we have—and I hate it.

8/ I did an 11-hour interview with @Playboy—yes, you read that right; fortunately, only 4+ hours was recorded, as it was almost ridiculously wide-ranging—two days ago. I was asked if I wake up in sweats worried I'm wrong. I said no because being wrong is the *best-case scenario*.

9/ That's something I hope folks like @KenDilanianNBC will remember: those of us who did *not* think we'd be doing what we're doing now, and didn't ask for it but wanted to help, love America and *never* forget that our research/writing being *wrong* would be *great* for America.

10/ When someone asks me whether I'd rather none of this had happened—even if it meant no one ever read my Twitter feed, or had any idea who I was—I write back to them YES even before I've finished reading the question. What a *dead heart* one would have to have to say otherwise.

2. Why is it scaring him? Fear has no place in what we're facing.

3. It's scaring him because

It crosses so many national boundaries, involves so many powerful players, and there is no body or organization that has the capability or jurisdiction to sort it out. This conspiracy is effectively beyond the reach of the law.

4. Our country is asleep. It needs to wake up and fast.

6. I think he's aghast, the way we should all be . . .

aghast by the very nature of the breach and the wide scope of the betrayal. This is global in its reach. From everything I've read it includes many, many powerful people across the world. Influential people, those with wads of money. There are strong, deep mobster links, an international cartel of criminality, the worst humankind has to offer.

Yeah, it should scare the bejesus out of everyone. And make us all even more determined to do everything we can to excise the cancer in the White House and all others involved in the treachery.

7. I don't believe any of this...

why I was just over at FoxNews.com and I couldn't find a word about the NY Times story except for an opinion piece by former speaker Newt Gingrich saying how the FBI members were betrayers of the Constitution for investigating the pResident. You people are just making this up if Fox News doesn't even have a single news story about it for their readers.