From beginning to end a MUST WATCH video. FULL ENGLISH TRANSLATION - Maddie McCann O Mistério Gonçalo Amaral - CMTV April 23rd 2016

Thanks to Joana Morais for English translation but she is not responsible if the text placement is not perfect. I know one word of Portuguese.. Window... so was a challenge but hope that anyone that knows Portuguese will not be looking at the translation captions and any mistakes should go unnoticed

I'm so happy to see Dr Amaral at last speaking freely and as always, completely honestly.

I found the content sobering and ultimately depressing as the reality hits home again how the HO and latterly Op Grange, combined with the woeful UK media, have endlessly mislead the public and attempted to pervert the truth and the facts of this case.

On a positive note, I feel certain that Dr Amaral will continue to educate the public in his own, eloquently truthful way.

I will be releasing a McMinute vid focusing on the forensic report that changed, but unfortunately, that is a postion of the video that I am not confident on the exact timing for captions..

If anyone can correct them for me I would appreciate it.

I have to judge where the little text box goes for each caption and try to rely on words I recognise... In this case I didnt recognise any words :)

Captions from video wrote:0:20:39.740,0:20:55.240So, indicia and some evidence, evidence in inverted commas, concerning the vestiges that were collected and sent to the English forensics laboratory for analyses,

0:20:55.240,0:20:59.760it is said that there could have been a manipulation of all that data, it's still not clear what happened.

0:20:59.760,0:21:13.080I recall that before we had the official report, we had a preliminary report which indicated that the fluids found in the car rented a month after the disappearance belonged to Madeleine McCann.

0:21:13.320,0:21:17.880And when the report arrived, it was no longer like that.

0:21:17.900,0:21:31.660It was said at the time that the profile with a series of alleles matched Madeleine's, yet they said that anyone in that laboratory could have contributed to that profile.

0:21:31.700,0:21:40.340So, why did it match to Madeleine's, and not, say to the US president profile?

0:21:40.340,0:21:47.160There's something very strange about that analysis, something that should be questioned, verified, investigated.

0:21:47.340,0:21:48.900I believe that when forensic analyses are done, the laboratory technician has to keep a record of what he is doing.

0:21:48.900,0:22:03.000I don't know if that was destroyed or not, but it should exist along side the report.

--------------------------------------------------

(...)

Manuel Rodrigues

1:01:44.880,1:01:51.220We've already talked here about the direct assistance given to the couple by English governmental aids...

1:01:51.220,1:01:54.620Anchor - The English government and the English police, is that what you are trying to say?

1:01:54.620,1:02:04.580- Obviously. I cannot say anything else differently. I cannot have a different interpretation when in a first exam that was done in an English laboratory,

1:02:04.580,1:02:11.160because the Portuguese had the honesty of sending them the evidence, they weren't even analysed here - '

1:02:11.160,1:02:14.920let's send it to England so they can carry out the tests so no doubts remain', in a first moment...

1:02:14.920,1:02:16.120Anchor - Honesty or naivety?

1:02:16.120,1:02:25.740Pure naivety. In a first moment 15 alleles of a series of 19 appear, that constituted Maddie's DNA,

1:02:25.740,1:02:33.580and in a second report those 15 alleles had completely vanished, there was no longer any DNA of the girl present in there.

1:02:33.580,1:02:38.140Anchor - So, what you are saying is that the probabilities for the "Guilt to die single" (Portuguese saying, no one get's blamed for it) are high.

Yes it was well worth the watch . Does anyone feel that this can go any further? If only they all would have gone back and done what jp needed to see and even try to be faithfull to madeleine. .joyce1938

The only salvation is that after all this time, all those lies, all those xenophobic rants, all those heavy hitters telling us black is white, all that bullying, all that misinformation and pink spin, all those interviews, and trips, and papal visits, we really are virtually back where we started... with the McCanns firmly in the frame!

Hi NickE,perhaps someone could openly ask Gordon Brown,"What was his involvement" now he is once again trumpeting the remain cause in the EU Referendum,he might squirm or wriggle if the question is asked?

@pennylane wrote:I'm so happy to see Dr Amaral at last speaking freely and as always, completely honestly.

The issue that I find to be confusing on this this forum is the fact that, perhaps with some justification, Goncala Amaral, sustains deification status, yet most would appear to be diametrically opposed to his hypothesis as to when and how Madeleine McCann met her fate, particularly the founding forefathers.

@pennylane wrote:I'm so happy to see Dr Amaral at last speaking freely and as always, completely honestly.

The issue that I find to be confusing on this this forum is the fact that, perhaps with some justification, Goncala Amaral, sustains deification status, yet most would appear to be diametrically opposed to his hypothesis as to when and how Madeleine McCann met her fate, particularly the founding forefathers.

Many agree and many disagree with Dr Amaral's hypothesis. I personally agree!

That's the beauty of a forum that allows varying opinions, as long as they don't come with a disruptive agenda.

@Cmaryholmes wrote:@Realist...the abduction story may be absurd, but it has been believed by millions for years.

Presumably, the same millions who believed Saddam Hussein possessed 'weapons of mass destruction,' there is a god who created the universe in 7 days, a Jesus who managed to feed around 5000 people with a couple of fish and a few loaves of bread , not to mention Freddie Starr eating his hamster for breakfast.

@pennylane wrote:I'm so happy to see Dr Amaral at last speaking freely and as always, completely honestly.

The issue that I find to be confusing on this this forum is the fact that, perhaps with some justification, Goncala Amaral, sustains deification status, yet most would appear to be diametrically opposed to his hypothesis as to when and how Madeleine McCann met her fate, particularly the founding forefathers.

Many agree and many disagree with Dr Amaral's hypothesis. I personally agree!

That's the beauty of a forum that allows varying opinions, as long as they don't come with a disruptive agenda.

The issue that I find to be confusing is the precise meaning - and point - of verbiage and circumlocutions, such as "sustains deification status", "the founding forefathers" and other grandiloquent or over-categorical turns of phrase, when plain, basic English would far better serve the advancement of genuine debate... if that is what is intended...

Very impressed by this. Thank you for translating it. Very powerful indeed. Just compare this to the garbage they put out on the "Crimewatch Special" UK in October 2013 - there really is no comparison. If only we could get professionals talking frankly like this on British TV. Instead we get Andy Redwood talking to Crimewatch presenter in a totally staged interview. I hope this video can achieve a large viewing audience on Youtube in the UK.