minimoog wrote:Only 2 'regulars' have been banned over the history of CTF, iirc.

One of them for flounce-technical issues, and the other against the wishes of a number of other posters who preferred to treat the banee as some kind of bullyable punchbag amusement for all.

I was just looking here and Isaac "50 couples" Hunt is on her own on a list of people unable to edit.

Did she not try and delete all her records and burn her fingernails or something so she couldn't be tracked all because Tokes wouldn't drive over somewhere and apologise??

I thought that was Firks?

No, Firks got banned from PH for breaching one of their fcuked-up coding things in a post subject.

I only remember Cotty and SexyTed being actually banned.

I got banned form PH about 4 times actually. Once for telling them to grow a fcuking pair to a Mod who was being a dick. the next time because they didn't like the sexual nature of a post I made (it really wasn't that bad s I recall )and the others because they worked out I was a previous banned poster.

Yup, as far as I know anyway. The cnuts didn't even have the decency to email me (or reply to emails ) about why I'd been banned.

Maybe I'm mis-remembering but didn't you also say their families ought to be killed too?

You are right, I'd forgot that.

What I said was any of their family who thought the nutter's actions was justified, along with any friends with the same views should be shot. No point waiting until the next one commits an attack. Goes the same for terrorists such as IRA etc by the way.

Was that what you said? Was it that nuanced?

Or did you say shoot the worthless subhuman bitch in the head & the rest of the family

Damned if I can recall exactly, but it did include the 'if they agree with her' part.

minimoog wrote:Only 2 'regulars' have been banned over the history of CTF, iirc.

One of them for flounce-technical issues, and the other against the wishes of a number of other posters who preferred to treat the banee as some kind of bullyable punchbag amusement for all.

I was just looking here and Isaac "50 couples" Hunt is on her own on a list of people unable to edit.

Did she not try and delete all her records and burn her fingernails or something so she couldn't be tracked all because Tokes wouldn't drive over somewhere and apologise??

I thought that was Firks?

No, Firks got banned from PH for breaching one of their fcuked-up coding things in a post subject.

I only remember Cotty and SexyTed being actually banned.

I got banned form PH about 4 times actually. Once for telling them to grow a fcuking pair to a Mod who was being a dick. the next time because they didn't like the sexual nature of a post I made (it really wasn't that bad s I recall )and the others because they worked out I was a previous banned poster.

My bad, I thought you had deliberately posted a particular character in a subject line which was known to cause problems but that must have been someone else!

Yup, as far as I know anyway. The cnuts didn't even have the decency to email me (or reply to emails ) about why I'd been banned.

Maybe I'm mis-remembering but didn't you also say their families ought to be killed too?

You are right, I'd forgot that.

What I said was any of their family who thought the nutter's actions was justified, along with any friends with the same views should be shot. No point waiting until the next one commits an attack. Goes the same for terrorists such as IRA etc by the way.

Was that what you said? Was it that nuanced?

Or did you say shoot the worthless subhuman bitch in the head & the rest of the family

Damned if I can recall exactly, but it did include the 'if they agree with her' part.

Yup, as far as I know anyway. The cnuts didn't even have the decency to email me (or reply to emails ) about why I'd been banned.

Maybe I'm mis-remembering but didn't you also say their families ought to be killed too?

You are right, I'd forgot that.

What I said was any of their family who thought the nutter's actions was justified, along with any friends with the same views should be shot. No point waiting until the next one commits an attack. Goes the same for terrorists such as IRA etc by the way.

Was that what you said? Was it that nuanced?

Or did you say shoot the worthless subhuman bitch in the head & the rest of the family

Damned if I can recall exactly, but it did include the 'if they agree with her' part.

Yup, as far as I know anyway. The cnuts didn't even have the decency to email me (or reply to emails ) about why I'd been banned.

Maybe I'm mis-remembering but didn't you also say their families ought to be killed too?

You are right, I'd forgot that.

What I said was any of their family who thought the nutter's actions was justified, along with any friends with the same views should be shot. No point waiting until the next one commits an attack. Goes the same for terrorists such as IRA etc by the way.

Was that what you said? Was it that nuanced?

Or did you say shoot the worthless subhuman bitch in the head & the rest of the family

Damned if I can recall exactly, but it did include the 'if they agree with her' part.

minimoog wrote:Only 2 'regulars' have been banned over the history of CTF, iirc.

One of them for flounce-technical issues, and the other against the wishes of a number of other posters who preferred to treat the banee as some kind of bullyable punchbag amusement for all.

I was just looking here and Isaac "50 couples" Hunt is on her own on a list of people unable to edit.

Did she not try and delete all her records and burn her fingernails or something so she couldn't be tracked all because Tokes wouldn't drive over somewhere and apologise??

I thought that was Firks?

That was me. Bedford rascal did it too but wasn't banned because he didn't embarrass them over the lotus debarcle. Different times!

No, Firks got banned from PH for breaching one of their fcuked-up coding things in a post subject.

I only remember Cotty and SexyTed being actually banned.

I got banned form PH about 4 times actually. Once for telling them to grow a fcuking pair to a Mod who was being a dick. the next time because they didn't like the sexual nature of a post I made (it really wasn't that bad s I recall )and the others because they worked out I was a previous banned poster.

My bad, I thought you had deliberately posted a particular character in a subject line which was known to cause problems but that must have been someone else!

Yup, as far as I know anyway. The cnuts didn't even have the decency to email me (or reply to emails ) about why I'd been banned.

Maybe I'm mis-remembering but didn't you also say their families ought to be killed too?

You are right, I'd forgot that.

What I said was any of their family who thought the nutter's actions was justified, along with any friends with the same views should be shot. No point waiting until the next one commits an attack. Goes the same for terrorists such as IRA etc by the way.

Was that what you said? Was it that nuanced?

Or did you say shoot the worthless subhuman bitch in the head & the rest of the family

Damned if I can recall exactly, but it did include the 'if they agree with her' part.

CJ+ wrote:Let's wrap this up and kick you out into the forums instead of turning this into your own private thread, yeah?

This isn't PH. No-one cares what you post. Our fraise blondemoderator and tinned-chicken-eating admin will delete anything that's excessively cnuty (but this is an astonishingly high bar to get over - in fact I don't know if a regular (i.e. not-a-spammer) poster has ever managed it)

If you're a massive -ist, then you will be called out for it, but you won't be moderated just for that - otherwise hooli and ID would have a terrible time here, and they seem to do OK

Welcome (back?). Just post things that are interesting or funny or whatever. If you want to see what this looks like, just look at DDD's posts and do that, because as I may or may not have already mentioned, he is Fcuking fantastic, and my idol, if only everyone was as fantastic as him >swoon<

Clown Ice Skater #4 wrote:My bad, I thought you had deliberately posted a particular character in a subject line which was known to cause problems but that must have been someone else!

As I remember it it went like this:

Someone on PH put a bra in the subject line and the rest of the page went kerfooey. This caused comment, which made it over here.I then went to have a look and worked out that they weren't filtering HTML tags in subject lines, and said "ha, the dicks, just imagine if someone posted a thread with a title of </td></tr></table></div><div style="display:none;"> (or something like that)".Someone here and I think it was Firks then only bloody went and did it. So nobody could read any threads in P&P and PH went ballistic.

Clown Ice Skater #4 wrote:My bad, I thought you had deliberately posted a particular character in a subject line which was known to cause problems but that must have been someone else!

As I remember it it went like this:

Someone on PH put a bra in the subject line and the rest of the page went kerfooey. This caused comment, which made it over here.I then went to have a look and worked out that they weren't filtering HTML tags in subject lines, and said "ha, the dicks, just imagine if someone posted a thread with a title of </td></tr></table></div><div style="display:none;"> (or something like that)".Someone here and I think it was Firks then only bloody went and did it. So nobody could read any threads in P&P and PH went ballistic.

Wasn't me as computer speak makes no sense to me and wouldn't know a div from a tldr but maybe I should stop denying it and just take the glory

Edited to add. Sure it wasn't Frik?

Last edited by Firkin on Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.