WASHINGTON -- Sure the rich may have to pay more in taxes. But a "fiscal cliff" budget deal could mean pain for nearly everyone else, too: higher airline ticket prices, for example, an end to Saturday mail delivery, fewer food stamps and lower farm subsidies.

Each of those changes would make some powerful constituency angry. And even if approved, they would be only a drop in the bucket toward reducing future deficits by trillions of dollars.

Still, all are being looked to as an immediate "down payment" on a deal to avoid the fiscal cliff, a looming $500 billion combination of automatic spending cuts and tax increases in the first nine months of next year alone.

Every dollar counts, even when the totals are pretty modest compared with a trillion dollars in tax increases and equal or bigger cuts to the huge government health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid that drive the federal budget.

That could mean federal workers, including the military, may soon be contributing more toward their pensions. Republicans may revive efforts to deny child tax credit payments to illegal immigrants. In all, the White House says it can generate $250 billion over coming years, including billions of dollars from selling excess federal property.

At issue are a handful of long-standing options to trim the federal budget. Several of them, such as increasing airline ticket fees to pay for Transportation Security Administration operations, are ideas from the budgets of both Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush.

The ideas have been blocked by opponents -- often powerful lobbying groups like the airline industry or public employee unions. They have come back to life as policymakers struggle for ways to defray annual trillion-dollar-plus budget deficits.

"All this stuff is hard. There's nothing easy here," said Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, a member of last year's failed deficit supercommittee, which sifted through a long roster of budget cuts and new fees. "But if everybody feels like everybody else is contributing, it makes it easier."

The supercommittee developed a roster but never nailed down any agreements, said an aide to a GOP panel member. If the panel had decided to "go big," more could have been asked of, say, federal workers or companies with underfunded pension plans. More controversial approaches such as curbing student loan subsidies also might have made it onto the agenda.

The failure of the supercommittee meant that some of the ideas -- particularly the less controversial ones -- were left vulnerable for plucking by lawmakers, not for deficit reduction but as ways to pay for new spending on things like highways, student loan subsidies and jobless benefits.

Easy-money options like auctioning public airwaves to communications companies ($15 billion over 10 years) or increased fees on mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ($36 billion) have been tapped already.

A long-standing 10-year, $749 million proposal to limit coal mine cleanup payments to states where problem sites have already been addressed -- long blocked by Wyoming senators -- was grabbed this summer to help pay for highway programs, as was a $1.1 billion subsidy for shipping food aid to foreign countries on U.S.-flagged ships.

With the low-hanging fruit already picked, the ideas that remain are generally more controversial.

Take federal workers. They were clipped in February to help pay for extending unemployment benefits for people without jobs for more than six months. Newly hired federal workers now have to contribute an additional 2.3 percent of their pay toward their pensions. That move came after a huge behind-the-scenes battle in which Washington-area lawmakers like Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., succeeded in stifling an effort to make existing workers to contribute more as well.

"Federal employees are the only group in America that's been asked to make a sacrifice with respect to the national debt. They've had their pay frozen for three years in a row. They financed the payroll tax cut extension," said Rep. Gerry Connelly, D-Va., whose suburban district near Washington is home to 58,000 active federal workers. "They've already given."

So what's left?

Lots of things that promise to irritate people while doing little to curb the deficit. But as the saying goes, "a billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money."

A compromise proposal sure to anger airlines and their passengers alike would double from $2.50 to $5 the fee per nonstop flight, meaning that the price of a typical roundtrip ticket would rise $5. It would raise $1 billion a year.

There's a long-standing proposal to raise prescription drug copayments for active duty and retired military and to require some to use a mail order program for drugs to treat chronic conditions.

Cutting farm subsidies and food stamps also is being eyed as an alternative to the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts in January. Members of the House and Senate Agriculture committees are struggling to reach a deal on comprehensive farm bill before the end of the year.

Even if they do, the potential 10-year saving are not that great: between $23 billion and $35 billion, including $4 billion to $16 billion in food stamp cuts.

Efforts to stem losses by the Postal Service by allowing it to cut Saturday delivery and close facilities seem like even more of a long shot, even though the administration proposed last year to claim $16 billion through such postal changes. A Senate-passed bill doesn't generate that much savings.

Those taking a cautious view say that the roster of proposals -- though not as controversial as, say, cuts to Medicare -- can be maddeningly complicated.

During the supercommittee, this was supposed to be the part everyone agreed to, recalls the aide to the GOP member. The aide spoke only on condition of anonymity -- not authorized to speak publicly and candidly about the panel's work, virtually all of it secret.

Follow Us

blue star wrote on Dec 4, 2012 9:29 AM:

" I'm confused... I thought the Post Office was no longer a federal agency. Apparently not, if the feds can cut their hours. Anybody know about this? "

" Yeah, yeah, yeah... I've been hearing that the Post Office wants to cut out Saturday deliveries for over 20 years. I get sick of hearing them cry wolf... Don't bring this subject up any more in the future. "

" Who cares. The post office is irrelevant for most people who are not old. Younger people pay bills, receive pay, correspondents, etc, all through the computer. I have to remind myself to empty all the junk out of my mailbox once in a while. People should have to go to the post office to get their mail and they should end all the junk mail. Mail is so antiquated. "

" That's not true. There are a lot of companies and services that I do not want to have my email address, so I rely on the mail to receive updates and bills. Not to mention the magazines we subscribe to (which I'd cancel before ever reading them online), the local weekly paper, coupons, advertisements for restaurants, fuel oil, and other services, and newsletters from the town, local groups, the kids' schools, etc. And every once in a while we still get letters from people, cards, etc. I agree that we use the internet for the rest, but I'm not willing to give up on having the Post Office, it's a needed service. Should they have to come out 6 days a week? No, not anymore. But a few times a week would be nice. I suggest they do an odd-even week schedule, i.e., Mon-Wed-Fri the first week, followed by Tue-Thus-Sat the following week, and so on. Priority mail would arrive daily as needed and people will still have to pay more for that. There are also businesses that only use certified mail to contact customers, employees, etc. Even if you never use the mail service, other people do. It's an asset to this country and something that could never be replicated if it was disbanded. (And no, I'm not a mail carrier nor do I know anyone who is. I'm someone who used to live in another country and can see how lucky Americans are to have this resource). "

" My mail comes so late that I wouldn't even notice anyway. But, they should NOT cut out Saturday delivery. Jobs are scarce enough in this state. Why doesn't the government pick on someone their own size? How about cutting some of the high paid politicians jobs??? "

Post a reader comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog. Please be civil and respectful.If you're witty, to the point and quotable, your reader comments may also be included on the Around the Towns page of The Sunday Republican. Readers must be registered and logged in to post comments on the site. Registration is free. Click Here to register.
A Subscription is not required to post comments only a Registration.