This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

An increasing number of proteins are being shown to assemble into amyloid structures,
self-seeding fibrillar aggregates that may lead to pathological states or play essential
biological functions in organisms. Bacterial cell factories have raised as privileged
model systems to understand the mechanisms behind amyloid assembly and the cellular
fitness cost associated to the formation of these aggregates. In the near future,
these bacterial systems will allow implementing high-throughput screening approaches
to identify effective modulators of amyloid aggregation.

Commentary

The aggregation of proteins into amyloid structures is the triggering event on the
onset of a growing number of human disorders, from neurodegenerative diseases as Alzheimer,
Parkinson, Huntington or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies to non-neurodegenerative
systemic and localized amyloidosis, as senile systemic amyloidosis or type II diabetes
[1]. In addition, it is now clear that different organisms, from virus to humans, exploit
the special architecture of amyloids for functional purposes, such as cellular invasion
or hormone storage
[2]. Therefore, protein aggregation has emerged from a neglected area of protein science
to a central issue in biology and biomedicine.

Many biochemical pathways, from DNA replication to protein degradation, have been
modeled first in bacteria. However, despite it has been long recognized that heterologous
protein expression in bacterial cell factories results often in the formation of insoluble
deposits composed essentially by the target protein
[3,4], only recently some groups have dared to exploit this well-characterized phenomena
to model amyloid formation
[5,6]. This delay resulted mainly from the fact that these aggregates, known as inclusion
bodies (IBs), were traditionally considered unstructured protein particles only useful
to obtain denatured protein for refolding purposes. This old framework has changed
into a new scenario where intracellular aggregation in bacteria is providing important
clues on the molecular determinants of amyloid formation and its remediation
[7,8].

A first inflection in the field came along with early reports describing a selective
molecular structure inside IBs. It has been found a substantial similitude between
the properties of these bacterial aggregates and the pathological fibrils linked to
amyloidosis. On one side, IBs generally bind thioflavin T and Congo Red, the typical
amyloid dyes, and display seeding ability in the fibrillar assembly of homologous
monomers
[9,10]. On the other side, low resolution techniques, such as infra-red spectroscopy, circular
dichroism or X-ray difracction, denote the presence of signals corresponding to tightly
packed intermolecular β-sheets, similar to those in amyloid fibrils
[9-11]. Importantly, these findings come from independent studies using completely different
protein models, not related in sequence or structure, thus suggesting that the amyloid
signature might be a generic feature of bacterial aggregates. Furthermore, high resolution
approaches, such as hydrogen/deuterium exchange by NMR or solid-state NMR have been
used to study different bacterial IBs, defining their molecular structure at the residue
level. These analysis prove that, at least for amyloidogenic proteins, bacterial IBs
and fibrils share the same amyloid core. However, they also show that part of the
polypeptide sequence or, alternatively, a fraction of the molecules remain disordered
and/or in native-like conformations inside these aggregates
[11,12]. Contrary to the previous assumption that IBs were totally inactive, the presence
of native-like structure endorse IBs with a certain degree of biological activity
[13-17]. This observation has opened the door to the use of bacteria as small factories to
produce promising functional materials and catalysts, boosting the investigation of
the structural and functional properties of IBs
[18-23].

It is now clear that they are the oligomeric assemblies populating the fibrillation
pathway and not the mature fibrils that exert the main cytotoxic effect in conformational
disorders
[2]. The structures of these oligomeric intermediates states have been the subject of
debate for many years. The similarity between IBs and amyloids has arisen a critical
question: do IBs exert a cytotoxic effect analogous to that recurrently observed for
fibrils? The answer is: Yes, the addition of purified bacterial IBs to neuronal cultured
cells produces a loss in cell viability equal to that promoted by the same concentration
of amyloid material
[24,25]. Bacterial IBs contain small heat shock proteins (sHSPs), which are highly homologous
to those found in the aggregates of the brains of patients suffering different neuronal
pathologies. It has been proposed that in the brain these sHSPs might break down amyloid
fibril structure, resulting in the accumulation of toxic oligomeric species. The observation
that the neurotoxicity of IBs correlates with the amount of oligomeric assemblies
and chaperones in these aggregates and the possibility to identify at the residue
level the determinants of this effect
[25] are expected to provide new molecular insights on the structures of the deleterious
species in amyloid assemblies. Thus, protein overexpression in bacterial cell factories,
by mimicking the conditions in the cell under stress, will likely allow to address
aspects of amyloid biology that are otherwise technically impossible to study in more
complex contexts.

Prion proteins are a particularly interesting and dangerous type of amyloids, since
their aggregated states have self-perpetuating ability and thus become infectious.
Het-s, from the fungus Podospora anserina, was the first prion protein whose bacterial IBs were shown to display amyloid-like
properties
[12,26]. The differential trait of these aggregates emerged when they were transfected into
prion-free fungal strains, as they promoted prionic conversion at levels comparable
to those induced by homologous amyloid fibrils
[12]. This result has been later corroborated in the case of the yeast prion Sup35. The
IBs of this protein have been used to induce the prion phenotype in prion-free yeast
strains, with the novel evidence that the infectivity rate can be easily modulated
by tuning the environmental conditions during the formation of IBs
[27]. When instead of being expressed intracellularly, this protein is directed to the
secretory pathway, the aggregates are formed in the cell surface of bacteria, but
they are also able to template the conformational prionic change
[28]. These recent observations provide perhaps the best confirmation that the IBs molecular
structure highly resembles to the fine architecture of amyloid fibrils, in such a
way that even the infectious properties of amyloids, which depend on very specific
conformational properties, are conserved in the two type of aggregates. This evidence
bears important implications for the use of bacteria to model amyloids, since prion-like
behaviour is currently receiving preferential attention in the field, due to the growing
realisation that protein-based infection may be behind frequently occurring neurodegenerative
disorders such Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases
[29].

The increasing medical and economic impact of aggregation-linked diseases in our society
has fueled the development of methods to identify chemical compounds that can interfere
with amyloidogenic pathways, having thus therapeutic potential to treat or prevent
these disorders. Generally, these assays, used by many biopharma companies, are cumbersome,
lack reproducibility, use expensive synthetic peptides and are performed in physiologically
non-relevant contexts. Several labs are focusing their efforts towards bacterial systems
to overcome these limitations. In this context, fluorescent tag reporters of aggregation
have been employed in bacteria to measure in a straightforward manner the amyloid
assembly rate, as the final fluorescence of the aggregate is the result of a kinetic
competition between folding and aggregation
[15,30,31]. Any compound that enhances or inhibits one of these two competing reactions can
be easily detected by spectrofluorometry. This property has been exploited recently
both in living bacteria and in vitro, using purified IBs, to implement high-throughput, 96-well-plate based, assays able
to identify and characterize novel amyloid modulators in large compound libraries
[32,33]. As stated above, the amyloid nature of bacterial aggregates can be assessed using
dyes such as Thioflavin-S (Th-S), whose spectroscopic properties change upon binding
to amyloid structures. This characteristic, together with the ability of the dye to
enter intact cells can be used to detect in vivo the formation of amyloid structures inside bacteria. The application of flow cytometry
to detect (Th-S) fluorescence has been shown to be a fast, robust, quantitative, non-invasive
method to screen for the presence of in vivo intracellular amyloid-like aggregates in bacteria as well as for monitoring the effect
of amyloid inhibitors in intact cells, skipping the need for a genetically encoded
reporter
[34]. Although still in an early stage, it is clear that, apart from its academic interest,
modeling amyloid formation in bacteria might render important economic revenues. The
above examples illustrate how bacterial cell factories can be easily adapted to develop
screening tools for amyloid aggregation inhibitors that will outperform the conventional
screening procedures used by the industry.

Acknowledgements

Work in our lab is supported by grants BFU2010-14901 from Ministerio de Ciencia e
Innovación (Spain) and 2009-SGR 760 from AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya). SV has
been granted an ICREA ACADEMIA award (ICREA).