If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

OpenBSD is not more secure then Linux, its actually less secure because they do not have anything like AppArmor or SELinux. They rely on the hopes of their OS being bug free so if it isn't, there's no layers of defence.

Also, their third party apps from ports are not audited while linux is. So the more apps you install, insecurity grows exponentially.

Plus like M$, they cover up security flaws and even allow the FBI to plant backdoors

No, idiot. Show me BullShitDaily comparable security mechanism like Linux has. Linux is far more secure than your toy OS. BSD is no way advanced operating system! It's legacy OS that lacks ANY real world security protection. There's a reason why Linux was chosen by National Security Agency. One more thing: even Linux chroot is more secure than bsd jails, so don't compromise yourself further.

One more thing: even Linux chroot is more secure than bsd jails, so don't compromise yourself further.

Thats true, in fact Linux (Not BSD) invented the chroot. BSD cunts manage to lie to everyone that they invented the chroot. No, it was Linux FULL STOP.

BSDs just copied the chroot. Their jails are also apparently copied of a Linux developer except they also removed the code that makes the feature good and secure. So BSD jails are a shitty downgraded copy of an invention from Linux.

Linux didn't implement that feature cos the developer though it didn't mean expectations. So he went on to develop LXC which was implemented in Linux and is far more secure then anything.