Post-Darwinist

This blog provides stories that Denyse O'Leary, a Toronto-based journalist, has found to be of interest, as she covers the growing intelligent design controversy. It supports her book By Design or by Chance? (Augsburg 2004). Does the universe - and do life forms - show evidence of intelligent design? If so, Carl Sagan was wrong and so is Richard Dawkins. Now what?

Enter your search termsSubmit search form

Custom Search

Monday, December 07, 2009

Evolutionary psychology: If they are going to chase their tails anyway, why don't they stick to origin of life?

British physicist David Tyler discusses recent evolutionary psychology speculations about the origin of religion:

the "potential answers" Culotta mentions at the outset have the word potential in bold and the rest is in the imagination. What is strikingly lacking in these studies is any questioning of the materialist mindset of the researchers. The most significant way they follow Darwin is in excluding any thought that intelligent design issues need to be addressed before we can properly understand humanity. Indeed, the researchers set up a culture that portrays teleology as anti-science. Culotta reports on the findings of cognitive psychologists working with some undergraduate students: "When the undergrads had to respond under time pressure, they were likely to agree with nonscientific statements such as "The sun radiates heat because warmth nurtures life." "It's hard work to overcome these teleological explanations," says Kelemen, who adds that the data also suggest an uphill battle for scientific literacy. "When you speed people up, their hard work goes by the wayside." She's now investigating how professional scientists perform on her tests. Such purpose-driven beliefs are a step on the way to religion, she says. "Things exist for purposes, things are intentionally caused, things are intentionally caused for a purpose by some agent. ... You begin to see that a god is a likely thing for a human mind to construct.""

These attitudes are deeply worrying, because the researchers have started with the premise of philosophical naturalism. If a teleological perspective is correct, these researchers have no way of discovering the truth. When we look at the radiation that life needs to be sustained, and then look at the radiation emitted by the sun, the match is superb. It is perfectly reasonable to make design inferences and to test teleological hypotheses.

Yes, but it doesn't lead to a society in which a scientific elite can emit any piffle or bafflegab and be both supported by the taxpayer and wholeheartedly believed - even if the piffle or bafflegab changes next year.

Intellectual freedom in Canada: American journalist detained and searched at border - for fear she'd criticize the Olympics

As if there wasn't a lot to criticize about the Olympics ...

Canadian border guards detained and interrogated American journalist Amy Goodman, host of Democracy Now on US public radio, because border agents feared she would criticize the 2010 Olympic Winter Games, according to CanWest.

CBC reported that she was asked repeatedly what subjects she would cover at her speaking engagements in Vancouver and Victoria.

Goodman said her car was searched and the officials demanded to look at her notes and her computer," reported the CBC. "I am deeply concerned that as a journalist I would be flagged and that the concern – the major concern – was the content of my speech," said Goodman.

American journalists are apparently in a "tizzy", now that they have had a taste of where their wonderful new "hate speech" laws really lead.

“I could see any country in the world doing this, except Canada,” Lucy Dalglish, head of the Washington-based Reporters' Committee for Freedom of the Press, said yesterday. “I was stunned by what happened.”

I wasn't.

And the vast, online social media network south of the border, much of it spawned by the Barack Obama presidential campaign, is feasting on the story.

- Rick Mickleburgh, Globe and Mail, December 5, 2009

US journalists, if any are listening: Here is what anti-hate legislation does: It is a huge moral hazard. It attracts to the government payroll a whack of busybodies, social engineers, shakedown artists, bounty hunters, pipsqueak Torquemadas, snoops, sneaks, spies, and fascists. People you would not ever wish to know have unaccountable power over you.

Slowly but surely, we are taking out that trash here. But it takes time, and brave, committed citizens.

And Amy, I would love to have more sympathy for you. But if you can't take it, please don't go home and dish it out, crowing over "anti-hate" laws. I am glad to think that your experience will help you to be a free speech journalist and fight back, as many of us are doing here, despite many obstacles.

On behalf of The Writers’ Union of Canada, I wish to record our strong objection to perceived attempts to censor and stifle the right to express dissenting views regarding the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics.

On November 26, 2009 U.S. reporter Amy Goodman was detained by Canadian Border Services Agency, Pacific Region, while attempting to enter Canada to give a book promotional speech at the Vancouver Public Library. Ms. Goodman was repeatedly interrogated as to whether she was planning to speak about the Winter Olympics. She was photographed, control documents were stapled to her passport, and her vehicle and computer were searched.

This treatment of a distinguished American journalist has damaged Canada in the eyes of the world.

Earlier this year I was compelled to write with regard to intimidating behaviour on the part of the Integrated Securities Unit (ISU) while interviewing Dr. Chris Shaw, the author of Five Ring Circus: Myths and Realities of the Olympic Games. Now, as then, The Writers’ Union of Canada requests a formal assurance that the freedom of writers and journalists to criticize the Canadian Olympics will be respected, as befits the guarantees outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Erna ParisChairThe Writers’ Union of Canada

Oh sure. This all sounds very fine, but when Canadian journalists and magazines were under assault last year from extraordinary "human rights" commissions, I heard nothing from the Writers' Union. Which is why I dropped out. If they had to wait till an American was targeted before they noticed, they sure won't get my membership dollar ever again.