Chuck Baldwin is a Radio Talk Show host, syndicated columnist, and pastor dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America was founded. I encourage Chuck Baldwin to read and heed Beyond Babylon: Europe's Rise and Fall and share its message with his audience.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann is rocketing up the Obama Administration’s enemies list because she is asking questions no liberal wants asked and making points they certainly do not want made. Yes indeed she isIf Congress Shall Make Any Law?

I only found out about this today, so this is my show of support for such a noble project and pray it affect the hearts and minds of Americans and others worldwide who will become aware of these prayerful life-saving efforts that God will surely bless since, as the Talmud states: "Whoever saves a single life, saves a whole world."

Here are a few pro-life articles I've written, pleading on behalf of the preborn:

Abortion: Blood of Innocents (Jeremiah 7:31)The cult of Choice is the worst symptom evident in society of the Hellenist disease. It sacrifices children upon the hedonistic altars of convenience and irresponsibility in an immoral and idolatrous way. It disguises itself as progressive and enlightened, but it is actually a dark throwback to the pagan rituals performed in the Valley of Hinnom: the holocaust of children that the prophet Jeremiah condemned (Jeremiah 7:31).

Monday, March 23, 2009

“The distraction on Capitol Hill this week has to do with the jackpot bonuses that executives at AIG recently received. The argument is over a relative drop in the bucket. The total amount of bonuses given out was $165 million. The government has put $170 billion into AIG so far. Many now are demanding we get this money back. We ought to be spending our time and effort doing something more worthwhile, like figuring out how the Federal Reserve is handling the trillions of dollars they are creating and pumping into the economy, and how that is affecting the purchasing power of dollars in your pocket…”

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Click text above to read full length version.1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control.”9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.(Read the full declaration here)

Merrell sarcastically gave the judge a "good-for-you.""How dare people use a flimsy thing like the Constitution to darken your sanctimonious door!" he wrote to the judge. "The insane idea that a blue-gum baboon slashing our Constitution has to prove U.S. citizenship – as our silly old Constitution demands – is too absurd to consider in the sacred chambers of the tiny tin gods of the Potomac, adorning the royal purple and sipping Jim Jones Kool-Aid.

"Thanks to smug, slimy shysters like you, Obama gets a free ride – snootily stomping on our foolish Constitution, which supercilious idiots like you have long ago shredded for their own stupid opinions!" Merrell continued in the letter, a copy of which he provided to WND. .. more

Friday, March 20, 2009

Every insidious movement to destroy our constitutional rights will always be couched in slogans and phrases designed to suggest motivation completely contrary to the desired end result. "Fairness" is sought to deny fairness. Gun "safety" is sought to deny the right of "We The People" to safeguard ourselves from tyrannical government.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Hollywood producer, Bettina Viviano, has asked us to try to get the word out about a new documentary they are working on. It deals with how Obama stole the democratic nomination through fraud in the caucuses and primaries. They are trying to raise funds to be able to complete the film (they need at least $250,000), so they are asking folks to donate. Their website contains some pretty startling video clips showing some of the fraud that occurred.

[1] If you are able to do so, please donate to help Bettina raise the funds she needs to complete her documentary film.

[2] Please pass Bettina’s website url and message, on to all your Patriot eMail contacts … you may just have a benefactor in your list.

Your friend and fellow Patriot,

Richard Lawrence

Don’t lose hope … keep the faith … hold fast to your belief in America! You Patriots and I, will continue to fight on; in the blogs, in our eMails and all around the ‘net, until the TRUTH is known ... the usurper is exposed ... the infidel and deceiver is finally punished!

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

"Forced to choose, the poor, like the rich,love money more than political liberty;and the only political freedom capable of enduringis one that is so pruned as to keep the richfrom denuding the poor by ability or subtletyand the poor from robbing the rich by violence or votes."-- Will Durant(1885-1981) American psychologist, philosopherhttp://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Will.Durant.Quote.DEA1

"The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which donot beyond reasonable doubt contribute to the public welfare, is onlya species of legalized larceny. The wise and correct course to followin taxation is not to destroy those who have already secured success,but to create conditions under which everyone will have a better chanceto be successful."-- Calvin Coolidge(1873-1933), 30th US Presidenthttp://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Calvin.Coolidge.Quote.B6B6"

Monday, March 16, 2009

Besides not working, the "bailouts" & "stimulus plans" are also illegal! there is no provision in the US Constitution for giving public funding to corporate and private interests.

Did you know that leading up to the Declaration of Independence, the founding fathers had been enacting a 'Redress of Grievances' clause within the Magna Carta? Here is an excerpt from the 1215AD document:

[61] ... any one of our servants offend in any way against anyone or transgress any of the articles of the peace or the security and the offence be notified to four of the aforesaid twenty-five barons, those four barons shall come to us, or to our justiciar if we are out of the kingdom, and, laying the transgression before us, shall petition us to have that transgression corrected without delay. And if we do not correct the transgression, or if we are out of the kingdom, if our justiciar does not correct it, within forty days, reckoning from the time it was brought to our notice or to that of our justiciar if we were out of the kingdom, the aforesaid four barons shall refer that case to the rest of the twenty-five barons and those twenty-five barons together with the community of the whole land shall distrain and distress us in every way they can, namely, by seizing castles, lands, possessions, and in such other ways as they can, saving our person and the persons of our queen and our children, until, in their opinion, amends have been made; and when amends have been made, they shall obey us as they did before.

Did you know our US Constitution also has an Accountability Clause in the First Amendment? it's also known as the "forgotten clause", but Americans are just beginning to remember. Here it is:"... and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This part of the First Amendment is known as the "Accountability Clause", by which We the People can legally and peacefully demand accountability, and redress (remedy) of grievances (oppression) from a corrupted governing authority. This clause is also known as the "forgotten clause".

The founding fathers knew that it was possible for the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of government to someday begin to fail in their duty to uphold the Constitution and protect people's liberties by violating unalienable rights without cause.

They desired a process by which, should the election system become corrupted, the people could peacefully demand justice and accountability. Thus, the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment, was included and ratified into law... and it stands until this day, albeit largely forgotten.

Regarding this Accountability Clause, in an act of the Continental Congress in 1774 the founding fathers said:

"...If money is wanted by Rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, [the People] may retain [their money] until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility."

History proves that the unalienable right of a free people to petition their governing authorities for redress of grievances and oppression is completely moot unless there is a method by which redress of said grievances and oppression can be accomplished.

The American founders made it perfectly clear that this peaceful method of holding a oppressive government accountable is to simply withhold any and all monies claimed to be owed by the people being oppressed to the oppressing governing authority, thus removing support of a runaway tyrannical government.

For more information about the details of Federal Government Constitutional infractions, and We the People's Right to Petition for Redress of Grievances as guaranteed by the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment, listen to this 80 minutes audio presentation by Bob Schulz of We the People:

CC2009_Asheville_1.29.09.16.mp3Continental Congress 2009 Promotional Tour with Bob Schulz of We the People, recorded in Asheville, NC on Thursday, Jan 29 (80 minute audio file). It covers the history of our unalienable Right to Petition for Redress of Grievances as guaranteed by the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment, the recent lawsuits including the failure of Federal Government response in all three branches, and the apparent need for a CC2009 to determine a strategy to mandate a Constitutionally limited government accountable to the rule of law.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Those Jews to whom God has given this responsibility, who have preserved this holy knowledge, do know where the Temple stood and will stand and the exact location of the Holy of Holies. Satan knows it too, which is why he has stirred up the Nazi Muslim hornets to covet the Temple Mount, as well as the accursed Roman Catholic Cult. That ought to be evident to any with even very little spiritual discernment.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Wikipedia, the online "free encyclopedia" mega-site written and edited entirely by its users, has been deleting within minutes any mention of eligibility issues surrounding Barack Obama's presidency, with administrators kicking off anyone who writes about the subject, WND has learned.Find out the latest right now at WND.com.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

A U.S. senator has suggested that voters have made Barack Obama eligible to occupy the Oval Office, whether or not he meets the constitutional mandate of being a "natural born" citizen.

The comments from Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., came in an e-mail sent to a constituent shortly after the election, which just now was forwarded to WND.

The constituent had asked about Martinez's perspective on the issue on which WND and others have reported: claims made by dozens of lawsuits around the country that Obama might not meet the constitutional qualification for various reasons.

"Presidential candidates are vetted by voters at least twice – first in the primary elections and again in the general election. President-Elect Obama won the Democratic Party's nomination after one of the most fiercely contested presidential primaries in American history," Martinez responded.

"And, he has now been duly elected by the majority of voters in the United States. Throughout both the primary and general election, concerns about Mr. Obama's birthplace were raised. The voters have made clear their view that Mr. Obama meets the qualifications to hold the office of president," he wrote.

Multiple WND calls to Martinez's offices in Washington and Florida today asking for comment did not generate a response from the senator.

But he admitted the "federal government has the responsibility to make certain that the Constitution of the United States is not compromised. We must fight to uphold our Constitution through our courts and political processes."

He cited the constitutional provision requiring a president be "natural born."

But Martinez noted the Constitution does not provide for an enforcement mechanism, and he cited a federal court opinion that a taxpayer and voter in Pennsylvania didn't have standing to force Obama to provide documentation of his eligibility.

"The District Court dismissed Mr. [Philip] Berg's suit and held that the question of Obama's citizenship is not a matter for a court to decide. The court further noted that voters, not courts, should decide whether a particular presidential candidate is qualified to hold office," he wrote.Martinez did not respond to the issue of the actual requirements in the Constitution for the president to be "natural born."

The WND reader who forwarded the e-mail was alarmed.

"This is frightening in its implications and should alarm every freedom-loving American and military member. I myself am a veteran of the U.S. Air Force (1979-84). Senator Martinez has said, in essence, that it doesn't matter what the laws are or what the Constitution says. If the people elected him, Obama is president – period."

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

WND reported just a day ago when a lawyer organizing a challenge to Obama's presidency confirmed one of the plaintiffs, a soldier who is required to take orders from the commander in chief and would have a need to know his authority for being in office, was ordered by commanders not to talk to the media about his concerns.

Attorney Orly Taitz, the California activist who through her DefendOurFreedoms.us foundation is assembling the case, told WND of the military's order for the officer's silence.

The officer's identity was withheld to prevent further actions against him.

However, Taitz confirmed to WND there would be no lack of plaintiffs in her action, which challenges Obama to prove by what authority he operates as commander in chief.

John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution now working with the Foundation on Moral Law, an organization founded by former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, said the demand is a legitimate course of action.

"She basically is asking, 'By what authority' is Obama president," he told WND. "In other words, 'I want you to tell me by what authority. I don't really think you should hold the office.'"Eidsmoe said it's clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents that "he does not want the public to know."

According to the online Constitution.org resource: "The common law writ of Quo Warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents."

Although Obama officials have told WND all such allegations are "garbage," here is a partial listing and status update for some of the cases over Obama's eligibility:

New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed a case on behalf of Charles Kerchner and others alleging Congress didn't properly ascertain that Obama is qualified to hold the office of president.Pennsylvania Democrat Philip Berg has three cases pending, including Berg vs. Obama in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a separate Berg vs. Obama which is under seal at the U.S. District Court level and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, brought on behalf of a retired military member who could be facing recall to active duty by Obama.

Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.

Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.

Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.

In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.

Also in Ohio, there was the Greenberg v. Brunner case which ended when the judge threatened to assess all case costs against the plaintiff.

In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.

In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injunction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.

California attorney Orly Taitz has brought a case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, on behalf of Gail Lightfoot, the vice presidential candidate on the ballot with Ron Paul, four electors and two registered voters.

President Usurper ObamaHave you no fear of God? Do you consider yourself greater than Nimrod? Don't you know the Tower of Babel fell? That Satan was cast down from Heaven as a reject after lifting himself up so high?

Shame on conservative cowards!Shame on Ron Paul, Glen Beck, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh - and all the other hypocritical "conservatives" - who have FAILED to demand proof of Obama's alleged American citizenship!

Obama's African Coup in AmericaHow will the president usurper act when they come to take him away? When the Constitution is again upheld and the laws of this land he has shown contempt for enforced?

It is not in Germany's mind today, or its present peaceful people, to wage war against us, but that will all change overnight, after a head-on collision with the Islamic leader of a confederation of Muslim states, their mahdi, whetting Europe's appetite for more blood and morphing the EU into THE BEAST. They will destroy all Muslim opposition with a vengeance.

Whereas most Germans are not aware of vile intentions of influential Germans under Jesuit influence to revive the unholy Roman Empire of the German Nation, the Fourth Reich, to embark on a new crusade into the Middle East, Beyond Babylon: Europe's Rise and Fall bares their grand design before the world: the German-Assyrians will strike again!

The Atlantic Times, regardless of whether or not they believe any of this prophetic scenario possible, owes it to their readers to address this issue that is most serious to a growing number of Bible-believing Christians and many Jews. Can we trust them to deliver?