Pages

Monday, January 18, 2016

Douglas Groothuis out of Denver Seminary talks about how we should go about Christian apologetics:

After the dust
of a good argument settles, we may err by either understating or overstating
the force of our conclusions. If we understate, we are not being humble but
timid. If we overstate, we may be too proud to admit the limits and weakness of
the argument. The ideal is neither timidity nor grandiosity. Honest and
rational truth seeking should set the agenda….Certainty is no vice, as long as
it is grounded in clear and cogent arguments, is held with grace, and is
willing to entertain counterarguments sincerely. [1]