I have added 1 point to the scores of Hopper and Shank as given in Reichhelm, since this makes it consistent. As it stands, the scores Reichhelm gives cannot be correct, since if Hopper and Shank played one game less each, then the opponents in those games would have had to play one game less each too, but all other players have all games accounted for. If the game between Hopper and Shank were not played, that would only account for 1 missing point, not 2.