(b) if he so requests, the competent authorities of the receiving State shall, without delay, inform the consular post of the sending State if, within its consular district, a national of that State is arrested or committed to prison or to custodypending trial or is detained in any other manner.

During the course of the hearing, a board psychiatrist asked Dr. Klassen, vice-president of medical affairs at Ontario Shores, why he was recommending putting Mr. Kachkar on anti-psychotic drugs at this time, 30 days after the NCR verdict, keeping in mind that this was not done in the previous two years that Mr. Kachkar was in custody, pendingtrial for Sergeant Russell's death.

As regards the detention of persons subject to criminal proceedings, there is a risk of different treatment between those who are resident in the trial state and those who are not: a non-resident risks being remanded in custody pendingtrial even where, in similar circumstances, a resident would not.

525 (1) Where an accused who has been charged with an offence other than an offence listed in section 469 and who is not required to be detained in custody in respect of any other matter is being detained in custodypending his trial for that offence and the trial has not commenced

(4) If, following the hearing described in subsection (1), the judge is not satisfied that the continued detention of the accused in custody is justified within the meaning of subsection 515(10), the judge shall order that the accused be released from custody pending the trial of the charge on his giving an undertaking or entering into a recognizance described in any of ...[+++] paragraphs 515(2)(a) to (e) with such conditions described in subsection 515(4) as the judge considers desirable.

(ii) where the accused is, at his trial, determined to be guilty of the offence, until a sentence within the meaning of section 673 is imposed on the accused unless, at the time the accused is determined to be guilty, the court, judge or justice orders that the accused be taken intocustody pending such sentence.

As regards the detention of persons subject to criminal proceedings, there is a risk of different treatment between those who are resident in the trial state and those who are not: a non-resident risks being remanded in custody pendingtrial even where, in similar circumstances, a resident would not.

14 The presiding trial judge, or a trial judge of the court in which a person is tried, may, during or after the trial, make a special order as to the custody or conditional release of a document, exhibit or other thing produced at the trial as the circumstances or their nature make desirable and proper, including an order that narcotics under the Narcotic Control Act (Canada) or restricted or controlled drugs under the Food and Drugs Act (Canada) and regulations be released ...[+++] to the custody of police officers to be held by them pending a possible appeal.

14 The presiding trial judge, or a trial judge of the court in which a person is tried, may, during or after the trial, make a special order as to the custody or conditional release of a document, exhibit or other thing produced at the trial as the circumstances or their nature make desirable and proper, including an order that narcotics under the Narcotic Control Act (Canada) or restricted or controlled drugs under the Food and Drugs Act (Canada) and regulations be released ...[+++] to the custody of police officers to be held by them pending a possible appeal.

(Where the party seeks to obtain or terminate a release from pre-trialcustody or pending an appeal, or to vary the conditions of such release, the party should, and in other applications may, here set out in convenient paragraphs, designated (a), (b), (c), etc., concisely and precisely, the grounds or reasons why the order sought should be made).

Also, there are the creation of an offence for the breach of a non-communication order imposed on an accused who is remanded to pre-trial custody and a new election right for the accused as to his or her mode of trial where a preferred indictment has been filed against him or her where the Supreme Court of Canada orders a new trial.

(Return tabled) Question No. 1305 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to Bill C-10, in the year after it received royal assent: (a) broken down by offence, how many people have been charged for offences created by the bill; (b) broken down by offence, how many people have been convicted of offences created by the bill; (c) broken down by offence, what sentences have been issued to people convicted of offences created by the bill; (d) broken down by offence, how many people have been charged under the provisions of the bill; (e) broken down by offence, how many people have been convicted under the provisions of the bill; (f) broken down by off ...[+++]ence, how many people have been sentenced under the provisions of the bill; (g) broken down by offence, what sentences have been issued to people sentenced under the provisions of the bill; (h) in how many of the cases in (d) was a constitutional argument raised by the offender (i) at trial, (ii) on appeal; (i) broken down by geographic jurisdiction and instance, how many cases in (d) are pending (i) at the trial level, (ii) on appeal; (j) how much money has the government spent on prosecutions under the provisions of the bill; (k) how much money has the government spent defending the constitutionality of the bill; (l) in what cases, if any, did the bill provide for punishment where none was provided for under previously-existing provisions of the Criminal Code; (m) broken down by offence and length of sentence, in what cases, if any, did an offender sentenced under the provisions of the bill receive a longer sentence than what was allowed for under previously-existing provisions of the Criminal Code; (n) in what ways has the bill made streets and communities safer; (o) in what ways, if any, has the government reviewed the effectiveness of the bill; (p) what were the results of any such reviews; (q) what reviews of the effectiveness of the bill, if any, are ongoing; (r) when will the results of any such reviews be made available to P ...

Question No. 980 Ms. Françoise Boivin: With regard to Bill C-10, An Act to enact the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act and to amend the State Immunity Act, the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, the Youth Criminal Justice Act, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and other Acts: (a) what has the Department of Justice identified as the policy objectives or desired outcomes of Bill C-10 and what indicator has been identified to measure progress; (b) what has the Department identified as the overall legal costs for defending Bill C-10 from legal challenges; (c) when ...[+++]assessing the compliance of Bill C-10 with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms under section 4 of the Department of Justice Act, what measures were used to assess whether delays in trial processes and prison overcrowding would violate Charter-guaranteed rights; (d) what is the measure of post-sentence recidivism rates used now by the Department of Public Safety, and how is the success of Bill C-10 to be defined and measured; (e) what are the numbers of Aboriginal, women, addicted, cognitively-impaired or mentally-ill offenders in remand or federal custodyfacilities that are being used as a base against which to assess whether Bill C-10 increases or decreases those numbers; and (f) how is the government assessing benefits to victims of crime resulting from Bill C-10?

In view of the fact that Mr Alyaksandr Barazenka is being held in custodypending his trial for the January demonstration, despite his voluntary appearance at the Minsk city police department on 27 October for questioning, and is not allowed to face the charges without being kept in custody, which would be a common practice in democratic countries;

In view of the fact that Mr Alyaksandr Barazenka is being held in custodypending his trial for the January demonstration, despite his voluntary appearance at the Minsk city police department on 27 October for questioning, and is not allowed to face the charges without being kept in custody, which would be a common practice in democratic countries;

The ministry's adult institutional services division is responsible for the safe, secure custody of all Ontario adult inmates held on remand, awaitingtrial or other proceedings, as well as adult male and female offenders serving sentences of up to two years less a day.

All information and content displayed on this site (“Content”) is the property of their respective owners. This “Content” is provided to you “as is” and you agree to use it at your own risk. We assume no liability for the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of this information. For any matter concerning the site or its use, including any dispute, only Belgian law will apply, and only the courts of Brussels will have jurisdiction. By using the site, you thereby accept all the conditions of use.