I do. I apologize if I made a mistake, and thank those who took the time to write me a compliment. As for those who call me out for mistakes/transgressions I didn't commit, I'm as snarky and sarcastic as I can be without calling them fucking retards.

I ignore those who come hard with profanity, and those who are asking "fantasy league" questions. Then there are some folks who clearly are just venting or sharing their "expertise" and don't really want a reply. But if someone asks a legit question or makes a valid challenge, I write back. If they are complimentary, especially in some specific way about a piece, I write back. If they attack me without the #*%!#&@! words, maybe I respond, maybe I don't.

Most of my feedback lately, though, has been from folks trying to sell me cheap Viagra or offering me ways to earn $800 a day with a home-based business. They must know how tough this business has been on us lately.

I do respond, unless it's a tirade. If they dispute the point I'm trying to make, I usually try to clarify my position further or point out the reasoning which I used to present my opinion. If it's complimentary, I thank them for their interest and taking the time to write. It doesn't take long to acknowledge people. Even at their rudest, I usually thank people for reading it.

A recent column received a lot of feedback — 50/50 in terms of agreement and disagreement with my point/opinion.

Do you respond to those who take the time to write you? Why or why not?

I usually do.

Click to expand...

I never respond in the 'comments' section of the Web site -- nothing good can come of that.

If people actually have a valid point/grievance and leave some form of contact information (instead of anonymous phone messages, which are apparently the medium of choice around here), yeah, I'll respond to them. They probably won't like what I say, but I'll certainly tell them why we did what we did.

Two or three times, we have had e-bombs go off where I have gotten a lot of traffic on a particular issue. On a couple of those – one was an overwhelmingly positive response to a column I wrote, one was a campaign to get us to provide more coverage for a college team – I wrote lengthy, carefully composed responses on the basic topic and send that in response.

Technically, it is company policy that we have to respond to all emails we get, so long as they are civil and warrant a response.

I don't have to respond to "you fucking idiot douchebag" and I don't have to respond to "I really love Bumfuck and want them to win! Yay!"

But anything else, positive or negative, we're required to respond, and I try to. This policy is completely unenforceable, but it's a decent policy. If someone takes the time to write a civil email, I should take the time to respond, if only a sentence or two. People actually seem to appreciate it.