I was asked to sign a non-competition agreement. I ...

I was asked to sign a non-competition agreement. I terminated my contract with this company because I was un-happy working for them. The agreement states, for a period of twenty-four (24) months following the termination of this agreement I can not call on ,service or solicit business from any customer I had contact with or that for twelve months I can not work for a company that competes in business with this company. It also states that this agreement is governed by the laws of the state of Connecticut. I live in West Virginia and the work I done for this company was in West Virginia and Ohio. What do you think? I the work contract on March 14 2011

4 Answers

The Inca Trail is by far the most famous trek in South America and is rated by many to be in the top 5 treks in the world. In just 26 miles (45km) it manages to combine beautiful mountain scenery, lush cloud-forest, and subtropica of course, a stunning mix of Inca paving stones ruins and tunnels.

Gratitude as a discipline involves a conscious choice.....* Victims of circumstance owe it to fate. Victims of choice owe it to themselves.*One of the widest gaps in human experience is the gap between what we say we want to be and our willingness to discipline ourselves to get there.

An agreement not to compete may not be enforceable, but you would need a lawyer to tell you how that applies in your state, and how it would apply in a Connecticut court. California does not allow enforcement of a non-compete agreement (with a few exceptions), but there has been no court decision if another state rules that it is enforceable.

More Questions

It's possible that only one of you will sign the lease the problem would then lie between the two of you if something goes wrong along the road and both of you want to separate ways the one who signed the lease would be sole responsible in the signed contract that is if the other one wouldn't want ...

Rick - i dont have an answer although that's what i'm looking for. It seems as if AOL/HP doesn't want us to make comments when it goes against them. Reminds me of the Crimean vote where you can vote only YES.

That has happened to me twice. I went to sign on using my AOL 9.7 software and it got hung up and nothing happened. So I exited and signed on again. Then about 2 minutes later it bumped me off saying that another person with my screen name signed on. I'm pretty sure what happened is my first attempt ...

It can be in competition but in general from the stand point of profit the private company will almost always come on top. This is because private companies aren't bound to regulations and restrictions that public companies need to deal with. On the other hand public workers usually have small perks ...