The British government has prevented its child citizens being compensated and treated. Money and politics override child health safety. 20 years on children continue to be injured. Starting in 1986 Canada, to 1988 Japan and the UK to the present this previously unpublished account is definitive carefully researched and accessible.

Despite all the lies and deceit by health officials worldwide, the question “do vaccines cause autism” was answered when the Hannah Poling story broke in the USA [see CHS article here]. Hannah developed an autistic condition after 9 vaccines administered the same day. Under the media spotlight numerous US health officials and agencies conceded on broadcast US nationwide TV news from CBS and CNN. Full details with links to the original sources can be found in this CHS article: Vaccination Causes Autism – Say US Government & Merck’s Director of Vaccines. [Blue Text added 10 April 2011]

In the US Federal Court children have been compensated after findings they developed autism and other injuries. If you read nothing else we strongly recommend you read this: PDF Download – Text of email from US HRSA to Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News]. In it the US Health Resources Services Administration [HRSA] state to CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkission

We have compensated cases in which children exhibited an encephalopathy, or general brain disease. Encephalopathy may be accompanied by a medical progression of an array of symptoms including autistic behavior, autism, or seizures.”

The UK’s Department of Health and others appear to have been reckless as to the safety of British children over the manner in which Glaxo company, Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd’s Pluserix MMR vaccine was introduced and used on British Children in 1988

the problems with Pluserix MMR were known to the supplier, Glaxo company Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd from the experience of its introduction to Canada, in 1986, where Pluserix was marketed under the name “Trivirix”

Trivirix (Pluserix) was withdrawn from use in Canada in 1988 because it was dangerous, causing high levels of adverse reactions in children

the high levels of British adverse reactions to the vaccine were apparent and known about at British Ministerial level in 1990, as shown by ministerial correspondence

Pluserix/Trivirx are the identical vaccine manufactured in the identical Smith Kline factory in Belgium and with the exact same component parts and constituents

despite the Canadian position and contemporaneously with the final withdrawal of Pluserix/Trivirix in Canada the UK signed the contract to purchase Pluserix MMR from Glaxo company, Smith Kline & French Laboratories Limited in July 1988, even though it was known by then to be too dangerous for use on our children

SK&F was provided with a blanket indemnity in that contract by the NHS Procurement Directorate

the contract was signed up by the backdoor through the North East Thames Regional Health Authority as agent for the NHS Procurement Directorate rather than being a contract directly entered into with the NHS Procurement Directorate which negotiated the contract or the NHS Executive of the time

there was no Parliamentary scrutiny of this and it seems to have been effected in a manner Ministerially deniable

similar problems were experienced in Japan with the Japanese MMR vaccine which, in common with Pluserxi/Trivirix, contained the Urabe strain of mumps virus

the Japanese MMR was also withdrawn by 1992 on safety grounds having caused high levels of adverse reactions

the British government continued the licence for Pluserix MMR after 1992, which enabled it to be supplied overseas

even today, because it is cheaper than safer alternatives, organisations like UNICEF continue supplying urabe strain containing MMR vaccine to the more adverse reaction vulnerable and less well nourished third world children

since 1998, statistical papers claiming no evidence of an association between the MMR vaccine and autism have been published in a blaze of publicity, but when all the noise has died down, on subsequent careful examination, each one has been found to be flawed. These are the same kinds of statistical studies [epidemiology] used by the tobacco industry in the 1940’s and 50’s to claim smoking did not cause lung cancer

other than the Royal Free’s paper, no clinical studies of the MMR child litigants were undertaken or published

after being put under financial pressure by the British Government, in 2005 the Oxford based Cochrane Collaboration published a systematic review of all prior papers and its authors claimed to conclude the MMR vaccine was safe:-

it was shown the authors had violated the standards of evidence-based medicine [ref] and

and it later was discovered that the British Department of Health had increased the funding for Cochrane’s Oxford administration by £1 million per annum and extended the contracts of its British groups

Legal Aid funded claims by children started as early as 1991 and well before Dr Andrew Wakefield warned the British public about the vaccine. His efforts were met with the full force of the British establishment to discredit him and proceedings before the General Medical Council resumed only yesterday, which have been going on for three years.

The main false accusation levelled in February 2004 was that Wakefield made his disclosures in a medical paper published in The Lancet medical journal because he wanted to make money being an expert witness in Court. But few people know the following [and there is naturally full documentation on this].

Crispin Davis, the Chief Executive of Reed-Elsevier, the owners of “The Lancet”, had a few months earlier in the July [2003] been brought onto the Board of Directors of MMR litigation Defendants’ parent company GlaxoSmithKline.

Brian Deer, a freelance journalist was commissioned by The Sunday Times two months later in September 2003 to write the stories attacking Wakefield.

This was about two weeks before the Legal Services Commission final decision was due on withdrawal of Legal Aid from the MMR children’s UK litigation and which did withdraw legal aid.

The person who commissioned Deer was Paul Nuki, Sunday Times’ sometime Head of Newsroom investigations and “Focus” editor. Paul Nuki is son of Professor George Nuki. Professor George Nuki in 1987 sat on the Committee on Safety of Medicines when the CSM was considering Glaxo company Smith Kline & French Laboratories’ Pluserix MMR vaccine for safety approval. The CSM approved Pluserix MMR but it caused very high levels of adverse reactions and was withdrawn by the manufacturers on very little notice in late 1992 leaving the Department of Health in an embarrassing position.

Large numbers of British children were injured and legal aid claims had already started from as early as 1991, five years before Wakefield became involved and contrary to The Sunday Times’claims that this was all a scam set up by Wakefield and solicitor Richard Barr.

Sitting on the CSM with Professor George Nuki was Professor Sir Roy Meadow and Professor Sir David Hull. Professor Sir Roy Meadow is now notorious for his evidence falsely condemning mothers around the world for killing their children. This includes the Sally Clark case where vaccines are directly implicated in the cause of death, as revealed by Neville Hodgkinson in The Spectator, (What killed Sally Clark’s child? | The Spectator 16 May 2007 ) but which were specifically discounted by Professor Meadow in his evidence, despite sitting on the joint CSM/JCVI vaccine safety sub-committee with the UK Department of Health’s Head of Immunisation Professor David Salisbury and others to approve the MMR vaccine.

It was Professor Sir David Hull in 1998 who, as chairman of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, started the attacks on Wakefield’s work. The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation advises the Department of Health on vaccination issues and the childhood vaccination programme. As Chairman of the JCVI, Professor Sir David Hull could have taken action to deal with the issues over the MMR and protect British children. Despite his attacks on Wakefield’s work, alleging unethical research on children for no clinical benefit, two years later in 2000, it was Professor Sir David Hull who rewrote the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health ethical guidelines to permit research on children where there was no clinical benefit (albeit in The Royal Free’s case all the investigations were clinically justified).

The Sunday Times’ freelancer was assisted in his efforts with free advice and assistance from the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry funded and controlled company Medico Legal Investigations Limited. Medico Legal Investigations Limited speciality was in getting medical doctors on charges before the General Medical Council. So we know that before a single word was published by The Sunday Times, it was already being planned with the involvement of interested parties that Wakefield and colleagues were to be taken before the GMC.

Another free of charge helper to Sunday Times’ journalist Deer was Glaxo Wellcome funded Fellow and active British Medical Association member, Dr Evan Harris MP.Harris has advised and assisted Deer up to the present, including attending the Wakefield GMC hearings with Deer.

The Sunday Times’ freelance journalist was also assisted by The Royal Free’s Strategic Health Authority which in early 2004 passed Deer confidential documents ‘in the spirit of openness’. These included documents relating to the confidential medical treatment of the MMR child litigants. The SHA at first denied providing documents until it was pointed out the fact was disclosed by Dr Evan Harris MP, in Parliament on 15th March 2004.

In 2003 and later the freelance journalist was also being given illegally unofficial access [by a currently unconfirmed source] to confidential internal Royal Free documents. Deer had also by 2003 been provided illegally [by another currently unconfirmed source] with copies of documents from the British MMR litigation including detailed medical notes and histories and expert reports [text added 24/Jan/2010].

On Saturday 21 February 2004, Lancet Editor Richard Horton pre-empted the Sunday Times’ stories. Horton was reported in The Times claiming he would not have published the MMR part of The Royal Free’s Lancet paper had Wakefield’s paid involvement in the MMR litigation been disclosed. The Sunday Times had waited until Sunday 22 February 2004, 5 days before judgment in the MMR child litigants’ High Court challenge to the withdrawal of legal aid, to publish its stories attacking Wakefield. Prime Minister Blair was reported in the press on the issue as was Health Secretary Reid.

As Dr Horton records in his book [“MMR Science and Fiction: Exploring the Vaccine Crisis,“], he was the next day exchanging notes over dinner and liqueurs with a member of the UK’s medical regulatory body, The General Medical Council on possible bases for GMC proceedings against Andrew Wakefield: [“The confusion”: Richard Horton – a remarkably frank passage‘ John Stone BMJ 2 November 2004]. Despite being consulted on the charges to be brought Horton was also later to be called as a witness for the GMC prosecution. [Added 25/1/2010]

After years out of government it was politically important to UK Prime Minister Tony Blair’s New Labour government to have become and to remain electable to demonstrate it’s new credentials as friendly to UK business and commercial interests and “pro science”. The British drug company and vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline was also significant economically achieving annual worldwide drug sales by 2005 of £18.5 billion. Over one third of sales was for vaccines [£1.4 billion] and respiratory drugs [£5 billion] for treating asthma a chronic allergy condition which vaccines play a large part in causing [see further below onVaccines, Autism and Your Child’s Allergies]. [Added 24/1/2010]

That MMR is solely a political and money issue was given away by journalist Jeremy Laurance’s The Independent’s story of 24th February 2004. Laurance reported there was “delight” in Whitehall as “Ministers temper their triumphalism” and that “joy” was “unconfined at the discrediting of Andrew Wakefield“. [“Ministers temper their triumphalism but delight spreads at Whitehall” The Independent – Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor Tuesday, 24 February 2004 ].

This was bizarre if the issue was just which measles vaccine might be given to children. There was an acceptable, cheaper and more effective measles vaccine. This was hardly stuff for Prime Minister Blair to involve himself in but even he jumped in with both feet.

However, in the light of the British government’s financial indemnity to Glaxo, the potential damage to billion pound sterling Glaxo’s financial interests from a scandal over the vaccine and the British government’s liability in negligence to large numbers of children, it starts to make sense. This also puts into clearer perspective why the choice of which measles vaccine children received became a major political issue. It had and has nothing to do with protecting your children from disease or child health safety. [blue text 15/Jan/09]

Legal aid was withdrawn on 27th February 2004 in a secret judgment by High Court Judge Nigel Davis. The reasons remain unpublished today. Evidence given in open court at a different hearing included the allegation from a parent that an official admitted to her that legal aid was withdrawn after government pressure.

It was discovered in 2007 that Judge Sir Nigel Davis is the brother of Lancet owner’s CEO and main Glaxo board member Sir Crispin Davis. When challenged a statement was issued on Judge Davis’ behalf to The Telegraph newspaper’s legal correspondent Joshua Rosenberg and stated “The possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother’s position did not occur to him.“

The outcome of an investigation by the Office for Judicial Complaints found no impropriety and resulted in no action taken regarding the relationship between Judge Davis and his brother Crispin Davis’ GlaxoSmithKline board position.

On 15th March 2004 Dr Evan Harris launched an unprecedented and defamatory Parliamentary attack on Wakefield and his Royal Free colleagues and to which not one of Harris’ Liberal Democrat colleagues contributed. This was based on material in documents Sunday Times’ freelancer Deer had obtained and passed to Harris. Harris used the opportunity to raise the allegations The Sunday Times chose not to publish after being dismissed by Lancet Editor Dr Richard Horton. This occurred following a meeting at The Lancet’s offices on 18 February 2004 at which Harris was present with Brian Deer and attended by Andrew Wakefield, John Walker-Smith and Simon Murch. Horton wrote of this in his book “The tension had been heightened…. by the shadowy presence of Evan Harris, a Liberal-Democrat Member of Parliament” and “Evan Harris, the MP who had mysteriously joined Brian Deer at the Lancet’s offices …” [Richard Horton,’MMR: Science and Fiction – Exploring the Vaccine Crisis’ Granta Books 2004, pps 3 & 7] [added 25/1/2010].

Harris later attended with Deer at the subsequent GMC hearings [added 27/Jan/2010].

Crispin Davis was awarded a knighthood June 2004.

Sunday Times’ freelance journalist Brian Deer confirmed numerous times on his website [later removed as reported in The Spectator online by journalist Melanie Phillips] that it was he who had made the submissions to the GMC which led to the present GMC proceedings against Wakefield. Wakefield’s lawyers had reported in November 2004 that Deer had made a statutory complaint to the GMC and freelancer Deer reported in the Sunday Times in December 2004 that the General Medical Council was investigating the complaints against Wakefield. In 2004 The Sunday Times journalist wrote three letters of complaint to the GMC: 25 February, 12 March and 1 July 2004 [added 24/Jan/2010].

Professor Denis McDevitt was due in July 2007 to chair the unprecedented British General Medical Council hearing of the case of Doctors Wakefield, Murch and Professor Walker-Smith. McDevitt and the GMC failed to declare McDevitt’s personal involvement in approving the dangerous Pluserix MMR vaccine in 1988. He only stood down after Jamie Doward of the Observer, Martyn Halle, freelance journalist for the Sunday Express, Andy Wilks of the Mail on Sunday, Jenny Hope of the Daily Mail and Heather Mills of Private Eye challenged the GMC over the matter. [“MMR Conflict of Interest Zone” Private Eye – June 2007]

A British Medical Journal post suggests more troubling conflicts of interest of the current panel Chairman Dr Surendra Kumar. Kumar sits on two committees of the authority which licences the MMR vaccine (MHRA), the Independent Review Panel for Advertising and the Independent Review Panel for Borderline Products. Dr Kumar is also a shareholder in MMR defendants GlaxoSmithKline. “Re: Financial conflicts – shock horror” John Stone – British Medical Journal – 2 October 2008″ [Blue text 15/Jan/09]

Contrary to Lancet Editor Dr Richard Horton’s evidence to the GMC that he did not know of Wakefield’s paid involvement in the MMR litigation, Horton had detailed correspondence in 1997 disclosing that involvement The correspondence was with Richard Barr, the solicitor who was working on the MMR litigation with Wakefield to help all those seriously injured British children. This correspondence was considerably in advance of Horton’s February 1998 publication in The Lancet of the Royal Free’s paper containing the interpretation that MMR vaccine is associated with autism cases involving inflammatory bowel disease.

Notwithstanding this, the alleged non disclosure of the legal aid funding to Lancet Editor, Dr Richard Horton and the publication of the 1998 Royal Free paper was the nub of Deer’s The Sunday Times’ February 2004 attacks on Wakefield where it was claimed:-

“The investigation has found that when [Wakefield] warned parents to avoid MMR, and published research claiming a link with autism, he did not disclose he was being funded through solicitors seeking evidence to use against vaccine manufacturers. “

Now we know from this that Horton’s claims do not stand up and with them, those of The Sunday Times fall as well. But of course, not a word in the UK media.

Another key allegation in The Sunday Times’ journalist’s complaints to the GMC was that The Royal Free’s treatment of seriously ill autistic children with serious bowel disorder reported in the 1998 Lancet paper was simply research carried out without ethical approval. But the journalist was referring to the wrong ethical approval granted in December 1996 reference 172-96 when the applicable ethical approval was granted in 1995 reference 162-95. Ethics approval 162-95 was produced by Professor Walker-Smith’s defence team lawyers in the GMC. The production of this evidence contradicted numerous of the GMC’s allegations of professional misconduct against the doctors. In the 90 pages of GMC charges there are 113 references to 172-96.[added 25/Jan/2010].

It seems had it not been for the complaints by The Sunday Times’ freelance journalist or the claims of Lancet Editor Dr Richard Horton, there may never have been any GMC case brought: [“Wakefield unlikely to be charged over MMR scare” – By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor Sunday, 29 February 2004]. [added 25/Jan/2010].

Horton has not returned to the GMC Wakefield hearing this week [13/Jan/09] to clarify his evidence and face cross-examination. It seems only his statement will be read out.

As for the Legal Aid money, for months in 1996 the Royal Free Medical School prevaricated accepting it because “Clearly, this could lead to a case against the Government for damages.” wrote Dean Zuckerman privately to the British Medical Association Secretary on 11th October 1996.

What no one knows and disclosed here publicly exclusively worldwide for the first time is that when The Sunday Times published its allegations against Wakefield in 2004 their journalist already had the documents showing Wakefield – a man accused of doing what he did for the money – was fed up with this and had arranged in May 1997 for all the legal aid monies to be sent back and that he had intended to raise the money himself for the injured children [see copy Freedom of Information memo below – added 17/Jan/09].

It was the Royal Free which instead then reversed its position, decided to accept the money and arranged in July 1997 for it to be paid to special trustees. Wakefield was never going to and never did receive a cent.

Writing recently in the Autism File magazine [July 2009] Andrew Wakefield summarised the position regarding the allegations in The Sunday Times’ journalist’s complaints to the General Medical Council:-

Myths: The Lancet paper

was funded by the Legal Aid Board (LAB)

False – Not one penny of LAB money was spent on The Lancet paper. An LAB grant was provided for a separate viral detection study. This study, completed in 1999, does disclose the source of funding. The Lancet paper had been submitted for publication before the LAB grant was even available to be spent.

my involvement as a medical expert was kept ‘secret’

False – At least one year before publication, my senior co-authors, the Head of Department and the Dean of the Medical School7, and the CEO of the hospital were informed by me. This fact was also reported in the national press months prior to publication.

children were ‘sourced’ by lawyers to sue vaccine manufacturers

False – Children were referred, evaluated, and investigated on the basis of their clinical symptoms alone, following referral from the child’s physician.

children were litigants

False – At the time of their referral to the Royal Free – the time material to their inclusion in The Lancet paper – none of the children were litigants .

I had an undisclosed conflict of interest

False – The Lancet’s disclosure policy at that time was followed to the letter. Documentary evidence confirms that the editorial staff of The Lancet were fully aware that I was working as an expert on MMR litigation well in advance of the paper’s publication.

did not have Ethics Committee (EC) approval

False – The research element of the paper that required such an approval – detailed systematic analysis of children’s intestinal biopsies – was covered by the necessary EC approval.

I ‘fixed’ data and misreported clinical findings

False – There is absolutely no basis in fact for this claim and it has been exposed as false.

findings have not been independently replicated

False – The key findings of LNH and colitis in ASD children have been independently confirmed in 5 different countries.

has been retracted by most of the authors

False – 11 of 13 authors issued a retraction of an interpretation [that MMR vaccine causes autism]. This interpretation is not provided in the paper. While it remains a possibility, a possibility cannot be retracted.

the work is discredited

False – Those attemping to discredit the work have relied upon the myths above. The findings described in the paper are novel and important.

[Blue added 15/Jan/09]

In February 2008, award winning best selling author David Kirby broke the story of the case of Hannah Poling and how the US Department of Health and Human Services secretly conceded [ie. there was no need for a hearing] in a US Federal Court case that Hannah’s symptoms of autism were caused by the nine vaccines [ie. not just MMR] which she received in one day [The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read – David Kirby – Huffington Post – February 26, 2008].

The official HHS position is that they conceded [whether frankly or spin] that vaccines caused Hannah’s autistic symptoms by exacerbating an underlying mitochondrial disorder. The case put the issue high up the US political agenda and continues to receive coast-to-coast media coverage in the USA [but almost total silence in the UK]. CNN lists the autism issue in its top ten US health stories of 2008:-

#2 – Autism – “Debate over the causes of autism continued to rage after a court decided to compensate a family whose daughter developed the disorder after receiving childhood vaccinations” – Autism in CNN’s 2008 top ten US health stories

But Hannah’s case is not isolated and her “underlying” mitochondrial dysfunction appears not to be as rare as the US HHS would like us to think [Explaining Vaccines Autism & Mitochondrial Disorder]. And other cases have been made public [see below for details of another three involving MMR – but we do not know how many cases have been settled quietly, as Hannah’s case was before it became coast-to-coast news in the USA throughout 2008].

US Autism prevalence was put on the US presidential political agenda by all US presidential candidates in 2008:-

US President Barak Obama: “We’ve seen just a skyrocketing autism rate. Some people are suspicious that it’s connected to the vaccines. …. The science right now is inconclusive, but we have to research it.” “Obama Climbs On The Vaccine Bandwagon” – April 22, 2008 – David Kirby, Huffington Post]

“You do not want to bring your children into the world where we go on with the number of children who are born with autism tripling every 20 years, and nobody knows why,” Bill Clintonsaid.

In addition to the Hannah Poling case, the US Court also ruled last year in favour of a little boy Benjamin Zeller, deciding that as a result of the MMR vaccination received on 17 November 2004, Benjamin, suffered persistent, intractable seizures, encephalopathy, and developmental delay [US Court Rules In Favour Of Family In MMR Vaccine Case Ben Zeller J].

the judgement states the US Department of Health and Human Services had no alternative explanation beyond “Unconfirmed speculation by a few treating doctors, as with Dr. Wiznitzer’s hypothesization“

the standard of proof being applied in this US Court is identical to that in the English Court.

just like the English Court, these cases are decided by judge alone sitting without a jury [and that means better decisions on fact and evidence – no decisions from jury sympathy for the claimant]

In Banks v. HHS (Case 02-0738V, 2007 U.S. Claims LEXIS 254, July 20, 2007) MMR vaccine administered in March 2000 and the child was diagnosed with Pervasive Development Disorder [ie. Autistic Spectrum Disorder] secondary to acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). There have also been other reported cases. Michelle Cedillo’s case was one of the first three test cases. Michelle’s was a test case of whether Thiomersal and/or MMR vaccines were the cause of her autism and panapoly of other disorders.

The three test cases were unsucessful with judgements given in early 2009. Michelle Cedillo’s MMR case is under appeal. Just as The Sunday Times Journalist Brian Deer published stories in the UK immediately before the English Court judgment by Judge Davis [brother of Glaxo Director and Lancet CEO Crispin Davis] Deer published again, visiting the USA the week of the US Court decision. He had been also selectively passing documents about the UK litigation to the attorneys for the US defendant the Department of Health and Human Services. [Amended red 18/Jan/10].

New figures from the US show a doubling of autism in 5 years [ie. 2002-6 – see Table 1]. This represents US government tax dollars paid out.

TABLE 1 – USA SOCIAL SECURITY AUTISM FIGURES 2002-6

SSI RECIPIENTS

COUNTS FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN

RECEIVING BENEFITS

FOR AUTISTIC & OTHER PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS

AS OF DECEMBER IN 2002 – 2006

As Of December In Year

Children 21 and under

Adults 1/

All Recipients

2002

38,324

7,360

45,684

2003

44,076

9,282

53,358

2004

51,581

11,450

63,031

2005

59,479

13,647

73,126

2006

68,050

16,190

84,240

1/ INCLUDES PERSONS AGE 65 AND OVER WITH CLAIM TYPE = DISABILITY.

The US Inter-Agency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) has voted to recommend earmarking millions of dollars in research funds from the Combating Autism Act of 2006 to study the possible role of vaccines in the causation of autism – [“Top Federal Autism Panel Votes For Millions in Vaccine Research” – David Kirby – The Huffington Post – January 5, 2009].

Further recent news from the USA indicates US President Barak Obama is serious on the vaccines-to-autism issue [“TV’s Gupta Chosen for US Surgeon General” – By Ceci Connolly and Howard Kurtz – Washington Post Staff Writers – Wednesday, January 7, 2009].

And what is the British Department of Health doing about this? It seems nothing whatsoever, even though at the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee 17th June 2008 MPs and Peers heard Cambridge autism expert Professor Simon Baron-Cohen concede to a questioner that more research into the vaccine/autism connection is needed and that a recent study indicates autism costs the UK £28 Billion pa. The £28 billion figure includes hidden costs, like costs of people taken out of the economy, whether those affected or their carers. [LSE “Economic Consequences of Autism in the UK” – Study by team led by Professor Martin Knapp [Executive Summary] [NB. The main defect in the research is the assumption there are 433,000 are adults (aged 18 and over) who have autistic spectrum disorders. We have the research to show there are approximately 107,000 children but there is not such a number of adults, the 433,000 being a projection based on the numbers of children.]

Here are some of the politics and cronyism of Labour’s approach to burying the autism problem. Surprisingly, we do not have any official “body count” of autistic children and adults. All we have is the “first ever” prevalence study commissioned by the DoH in 2008 [announced by Ivan Lewis] but seemingly involving “Tony’s Cronies”. “Department of Health announces adult autism strategy” – Thursday, 8-May-2008.

The study is to find all the adult autistics who should exist [to prove autism has always been this high] and is not due to report until this year. Minister Tessa Jowell’s first husband and New Labour stalwart, Roger Jowell’s old company, NatCen is involved. NatCen (The National Centre for Social Research) is billed as a “not-for-profit” company and works almost exclusively for government and governmental organisations. : [“University of Leicester to lead audit of adults with autism” Eurekalert - 9-May-2008].

To prove autism has always been this high the authors must find approximately 400,000 adult autistics in the UK and their assumed approx 400,000 carers. But there cannot be that many. Office for National Statistics figures show the total number of adults caring for a dependent adult or relative in September 2001 for any reason was 326,000: [Data source: “Census figures Table 1-7 “The economically inactive who look after the family or home“]

Measles Comparison

See here how the risk to children in Western economies from measles is now insignificant for the vast majority MEASLES MORTALITY UK & USA.

[New Exclusive Worldwide Revelations 22/Jan/2009]

In addition to the new MMR vaccine, in 1990 infants were also “hit” with the “accelerated” DTP vaccine schedule – receiving three DTP shots – one each at 2, 3 and 4 months. Prior to this the intervals were 3, 5 and 9 to 12 months of age. The DTP vaccine contained a highly neurotoxic ingredient. The ingredient was an organo-mercury excipient called “Thiomersal” [“Thimerosal” in the USA]. Thiomersal is toxic in parts per billion – in extremely small dilutions. The vaccine was The Wellcome Foundation’s Trivax AD DTP vaccine. The Wellcome Foundation is now GlaxoSmithKline.Thiomersal was first introduced by pharmaceutical company Merck in the 1930s and was not clinically trialled for safety in use in vaccines.

Research shows that children with autism appear to have deficient mechanisms for expelling toxins like mercury and it accumulates in the body.

Revealed here exclusively worldwide for the first time, information obtained under the UK’s Freedom of Information law confirms the British MHRA [Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency] has no data on how much Thiomersal was in Trivax AD DTP vaccine. Although the British DoH [Department of Health] claimed publicly to have known, that claim therefore appears incorrect.

Your Child’s Allergies and Vaccines

Thiomersal is also known to induce allergy. Many children, in particular those with regressive autism, have serious problems with allergies. Some have exceptionally high levels of IgE, [the allergic antibody immunoglobulin E].

The date of the rise can be tracked back to 1990 using publicly available data. This increase has occurred in parallel with significant increases in other disorders like autism, asthma and childhood diabetes.

Thiomersal is a well recognised cause of allergies: [The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products – Medicines Evaluation Unit – Safety Working Party Assessment of the Toxicity of Thiomersal in Relation to Its Use in Medicinal Product SCPMP/SWP/I898/1998 – 8 September 1998].

Thiomersal is not the only component of vaccines which causes allergy. Adjuvants are an ingredient in almost all vaccines and cause allergy. US biotech company BioSante’s CEO, Steve Simes said on the launch of their new adjuvant:-

The problem with most adjuvants is that they can cause allergies,” said Simes. “Ours might not be as potent as others, but it is safer.”

And again revealed here exclusively worldwide for the first time is the recent British 2006-7 Parliamentary session House of Lords Science and Technology Committee Report “Allergy” [6th Report of Sesssion] makes no mention whatsoever ofany vaccine or of Thiomersal in vaccines or as being a cause of the exponential rise in childhood allergies which has occurred since 1990 in the UK [Amended 18/Jan/10].

The use of Thiomersal in other pharmaceuticals [eg. contact len cleaning fluid] has been strictly controlled in Europe: CPMP Position Paper on Thiomersal – Implementation of the Warning Statement Relating to Sensitisation. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products London, 21 October 1999 CPMP/2612/99]

Thiomersal contains 50% by weight of mercury. There is no safe limit – only a “permitted daily/weekly tolerable” limit. This is measured in parts per million per kilogramme of body weight. Those limits apply when ingested in food]. This neurotoxic organo-mercury compound was injected directly into infants’ bodies at a time their bodies and nervous systems were developing the most rapidly at any time in their lives. The amount of thiomersal claimed to be in Trivax AD DTP vaccine was 50 millionths of a gramme injected directly into the body.

A 4 kilo weight 2 month old baby would have received in one injection 63 times higher than the permitted tolerable daily intake in food set by the US Environmental protection Agency and the UK’s Committee on Toxicity.

To protect infants the PTWI set by the UK Committee on Toxicity for intake of mercury compounds in food for women who are pregnant, or who may become pregnant within the following year, or for breast-feeding mothers is one tenth of a millionth of gramme per kilogramme of body weight per day – for a 9 stone woman [57 kg] that is 5.7 millionths of a gram per day.

Calculation of an infant’s daily and overall body burden of toxic mercury must also include the burden from environmental pollution. [Sources include mercury in the air from power station emissions and in fish as a result of oceanic pollution by anti-fouling applied to ships’ hulls. Mercury is liquid at room temperature and evaporates forming a toxic vapour in the air].

Also revealed here worldwide for the first time under Freedom of Information is that the British Government also had no data on Thiomersal content of many other vaccines around that time and some had more than claimed by the British government was in DTP. Examples are Duncan Flockhart’s DTP vaccine – 130 millionths of a gramme thiomersal per millilitre and Lister Institute Pertussis vaccine – 120 mcg/ml Thiomersal. Accordingly, this brings into question how much was in Trivax AD DTP vaccine.

The British Government also hid this lack of knowledge from Parliament. A further revelation made here exclusively worldwide for the first timeis that British Health Minister Hazel Blears MP misled the English Parliament in 2001 when she said in a Parliamentary answer that“All childhood vaccines licensed since 1986 which have ever contained thiomersal as an excipient are listed in the table” [to the answer]. [House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 3 Jul 2001 (pt 19)]. The table contained no such details and listed only those vaccines granted a licence in the UK since 1993.

Julie Kirkbride MP had asked for the “vaccines …. licensed since 1986 which contain thiomersal“.

If you are asked have you been licensed to drive your car since 2006, you will answer “yes” even if you have held a licence since 1980. Blears’ answer was in fact the answer to the question of the “vaccines granted a licence since 1986 which contain Thiomersal”.

The British Government claims Thiomersal was phased out of its childhood vaccines in October 2004 [but vaccine stocks may have taken longer to run down and how safe is what has replaced it?].

A previously confidential 1991 internal Merck memorandum published by the USA’s Los Angeles Times shows the UK authorities had then known about the problem and were privately expressing concern to the vaccine manufacturer about the presence of mercury in vaccines. This was along with Sweden, Japan and Switzerland: [‘91 Memo Warned of Mercury in Shots – By Myron Levin – LA Times – February 08, 2005].

So why did they take 13 years to do something about it and why did they and do they continue to tell the British public there is and was no problem when they knew there was and is? And as vaccines also alter the functioning of the immune system, the removal of Thiomersal may well not be the only factor affecting the increases in autism, asthma, allergies and childhood diabetes. [see above – US Court Decisions and Other Recent Developments].

On 7-8 June 2000, a confidential private meeting without public scrutiny took place between vaccine manufacturers’ representatives, 51 US scientists, and a representative of the World Health Organization. This was to discuss a study by US Centers for Disease Control expert Dr Thomas Verstraeten of increasing doses of Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders in children. Verstraeten used US Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data, an official US governmental data bank on the children from US health maintenance organizations (HMOs).

Verstraeten’s study showed a dose-response relationship between Thimerosal in vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders in children that held up to rigorous statistical analyses. This means Verstraeten’s study showed a causal association between the amount of Thimerosal in vaccines a child received and the extent to which the child developed the symptoms of impaired brain development . These ranged from tics, speech impairment to symptoms of and full autism. The discussions can be read in the transcript of the Simpsonwood Conference obtained by US organisaton SafeMinds under Freedom of Information.

The IOM committee held closed meetings to discuss the report’s content and before considering the evidence. A transcript of a meeting on 12th January 2001 was disclosed in Court proceedings [US District Court of Texas, Eastern District; Case #5:03-CV-141].

Here are some quotes from the transcript:-

[the Centers for Disease Control] “wants us to declare, well, these things are pretty safe on a population basis.” [p33]

“We said this before you got here, and I think we said this yesterday, the point of no return, the line we will not cross in public policy is to pull the vaccine, change the schedule. We could say it is time to revisit this, but we would never recommend that level. Even recommending research is recommendations for policy. We wouldn’t say compensate, we wouldn’t say pull the vaccine, we wouldn’t say stop the program.” [p74]

“we are not ever going to come down that it is a true side effect,” [p97]

“Chances are, when all is said and done, we are still going to be in this category. It is just a general feeling that we probably still are not going to be able to make a statement,” [p123]

UK Residents – Write To Your Politicians – Do It Now!

Write to your Member of Parliament with the link to this page. If you do not write to your MP, and do not keep on writing them, then don’t complain when politicians do nothing. Write to your Member of Parliament with the link to this page. It is their job to represent you.

Ask your MP to ask the UK’s Secretary of State to explain why the British Government allows officials of the UK’s Department of Health to cause the human rights of children to be violated.

To email your MP, all you need to know is your MP’s name. MP’s email addresses are in the form:-

In the US the official diagnostic definition of what we call “Autism Spectrum Disorders” or ASD are instead called “Pervasive Development Disorders” or PDD for short. That is under the “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn)” or “DSM IV” for short.

“Autistic Spectrum Disorder” is the term applied internationally under the “ICD” or “International Classification of Disease”

Many refer to ASD and PDD as “autism” but “autism” is a subset of the spectrum and is often referred to also as “childhood autism”, “typical autism” and “Kanner autism”. [The common behaviours like hand flapping, loss of eye contact and suchlike in young children are unmistakable, whereas other spectrum disorders like mild Aspergers Syndrome can be more difficult to diagnose.]

96 Responses

The truth that vaccine policy is not about science or safety but about money and politics is finally seeing the light of day.

We have a choice to make about not only holding responsible parties accountable for destroying the lives of untold children around the world, but whether we want to destroy the human genome by the continued injection of dirty vaccine that punches holes in our immune systems.

The history of vaccine in littered with horrible mistakes and skulduggery – from the SV40 virus given to millions in the polio vaccine to the continued use of mercury and other heavy metals. The fact is even the best MMR vaccine is contaminated with avian retro virus and reverse transcriptase. This is criminal!

Anent Dr Stoller’s comment: The MMR can also be contaminated with Myelin Basic Protein (MBP) from the chick embryo cells that the measles virus component of it is, or at least used to be, cultured on. (Singh, et al.) MBP is what also makes up the myelin sheathing protecting the human cranial nerve systems. Thus the body’s immune system recognises it, in the vaccine, as something to be inflammatory to, and attack – and thus also the body’s own MBP. Result: conditions like MS. Another of the autoimmune diseases/conditions associated with vaccines.

The MMR also contains a substance called glutamic acid/glutamate, which acts as a stabilizer for the live viral components. Bad move. Glutamate is a neurotoxin; thus exacerbating the danger of the vaccine to the body. There’s more: It also lowers the child’s levels of glutathione, which is the body’s chelator for heavy metals/toxins – like the mercury and aluminium in some vaccines. (Yes, they are also in foodstuffs: but they are here in an inflammatory setting, therefore particularly hazardous to the body.) Thus, especially when the MMR is given at the same time as other vaccines which have either Hg or Al in them – whammo.

All of which is to say that the extreme pressure by the public health authorities to deny the dangers of the MMR is essentially political. Not scientific. Hopefully, that awareness is beginning to show through the coverup that has been going on, for far too long now. Keep up the good work in this regard.

Also noteworthy is that the episode was officially investigated from the clinical point of view by the father of Ben Goldacre – [the latter is a psychiatrist and medical journalist who attacks the parents of MMR damaged children in the Guardian newspaper and elsewhere]:

‘Cases of aseptic meningitis associated with measles/mumps/rubella vaccine were sought in thirteen UK health districts following a reported cluster in Nottingham which suggested a risk of 1 in 4000 doses, substantially higher than previous estimates based on cases reported by paediatricians (4 per million). Cases were ascertained by obtaining vaccination records of children with aseptic meningitis diagnosed from cerebrospinal fluid samples submitted to Public Health Laboratories or discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of viral meningitis. Both methods identified vaccination 15-35 days before onset as a significant risk factor and therefore indicative of a causal association. With both, half the aseptic meningitis cases identified in children aged 12-24 months were vaccine-associated with onset 15-35 days after vaccine. The study confirmed that the true risk was substantially higher than suggested by case reports from paediatricians, probably about 1 in 11,000 doses. However, the possibility that the aseptic meningitis induced by vaccination was largely asymptomatic and a chance laboratory finding in children investigated for other clinical conditions, particularly febrile convulsions, could not be excluded. Comparison of national reports of virus-positive mumps meningitis cases before and after the introduction of this vaccine indicated that the risk from wild mumps was about 4-fold higher than from vaccine. Altogether, 28 vaccine-associated cases were identified, all in recipients of vaccines containing the Urabe mumps strain. The absence of cases in recipients of vaccine containing the Jeryl Lynn strain, despite its 14% market share, suggested a higher risk from Urabe vaccine. A prospective adverse event surveillance system using the study methods is currently being established to assess the risk, if any, from the Jeryl Lynn strain which is now the only mumps vaccine used in the UK.’

(Note by convention the most important authors listed are the first two and the last.)

If this does not hit mainstream media in a big way then I will be disgusted-along with the news of the mumps component of the MMR in U.S. being quadrupled in 1990 and now in 2007 being reduced by almost half. Why?
My respect to all the truth-seeking reporters with some integrity out there.

Nothing surprises me anymore about the corrupt world of Pharma. I’ve just wrote to the Japanese Embassy regarding GSK’s current recruitment push for 7 to 17 year olds. The clinical trial they are recruiting for?

“To compare the efficacy of paroxetine versus placebo administered once daily (after evening meal) for 8 weeks in children and adolescents…”

Having read the history of all vaccines, this does not surprise me at all. The first smallpox vaccine was never shown to decrease smallpox incidence or deaths and hundreds of people were injured by the vaccine. Yet this nonsense has gone on now for over 150 years. When are people going to realise that injecting a toxic brew straight into a child’s bloodstream is voodoo medicine. The wonder is that so many children survive.

re smallpox vaccine. This is the vaccine, PR wise, that props up the rest, along with all the other drugs.

Tens of thousands more like. “Another Parliamentary return (No. 443, Session 1877) demonstrates that 25,000 babies are yearly sacrificed by diseases excited by Vaccination.”–NAVL 1880. Population in 1880 was 26 million. Easy seen and proven in Leicester (maybe the second biggest city then), which rejected vaccination for 30 years.

So you can see the mentality of the vaccinators, been dissembling big time for 150 years, at least, while at the top of the bodies of a million or so vaccine deaths, not to mention vaccine disease like autism. While vaccination hasn’t saved one single life. So suppressing the vaccine autism connection is to be expected.

Jennifer you say “…If this does not hit mainstream media in a big way then I will be disgusted…”

do you mean UK media?

well…. Hannah Poling ruling did not get a single mention in UK media.

MIND study confirming that 600-700% increase in autism rates in California was NOT due to better and earlier diagnosing and widening of criteria (those accounted for a mere 50-70%) was not reported by any major UK media.

if those two didn’t not make headlines I don’t see how anything else would. There must be are some very powerful forces behind the silence.

On the other hand pharma-funded worthless Italian study that claimed to prove that thimerosal in vaccines was not linked to autism, by excluding individuals with autism from the study, is reported all over as a final ‘nail in the coffin’.

Even if all future US vaccine court cases go to plaintiffs, I would be extremely surprised if any of it ever gets reported.

I seem to remember that there was an almost comically inept report of the Hannah Poling case in the Daily Mirror or The Sun – not prominent either, of course. It did actually get a toe hold in the national press thanks to the good work of Cassandra Jardine (with the help of Sally Beck):

While there are journalists who have balanced eye on these issues, what, of course, is keeping this in check is the intimidation of editors by lobby organisations, as well as their patronage of certain journalists.

clicked on the link to the Japanese study and ASD and meningitis – there is nothing there – do you have a link to this study – our child 14 years – hospitalised 10 days after MMR – viral infection in spinal fluid – regressed into ASD – all kids I have seen like ours are very severe compared to kids who did not crash into ASD – nothing surprises me re the cover ups – what do we call it “The Cigarette Wars” – just seems like there is so much money being made that really that is what is at the bottom of it – now that ASD is so prevalent there have to be family members who are working in big companies that know this is going on – only takes a few to speak out –
– would appreciate the article so I can keep this on file etc.
Great article and so so wish Andy Wakefield well – so many of our kids are leading painfree lives because of his work.

[Ed’s note: sent personal email to Mary Henderson re the Japanese story – it is pending and will be published in due course]

It is incredible that Annex I, part 3 of Directive 2001/83/EC on the community code relating to medicinal products for human use makes it a legal requirement to submit animal toxicity data with respect to human medicines, but only a voluntary requirement to submit pre-clinical human toxicity data (e.g. toxicogenomics). It is time to put the horse before the cart and make human cell tests a legal requirement before proceeding to clinical trials for any drugs or vaccines intended for human use.

Excellent publication which shows the vested interests which come before what was once a “Vocation”.

A similar expose of the FLUORIDE issue would be good whereby our so called MP’s abbrogated their responsibility and gave water companies carte blanche indemnification against criminal prosecution if they were required to dump this toxic waste into out water systems..
NB VACCINATION = GENOCIDE
Chris

[…] In the UK Brian Deer’s first attacks in The Sunday Times on Wakefield [Sun 22/Feb/04] was also made just days before a crucial Court decision [Fri 27/Feb/04] which took away legal funding from the British MMR vaccine damage children’s case. The Judge who took the money away, Judge Nigel Davis, is the brother of Glaxo board director Crispin Davis who had been hired onto the Glaxo Board only 2 months before The Sunday Times hired Deer to trash Wakefield. Crispin Davis was conveniently for Glaxo, the CEO of the owners of The Lancet. Judge Davis later claimed that it had not occurred to him there might be a conflict of interest. Read more about it all here: British Government & Establishment’s Efforts to Deny Compensation to MMR Vaccine Child Victims. […]

[…] dd too. Crazy that they don’t allow for ANYONE to opt out, even with family history of problems. Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action Child Health Safety This link is very enlightening re: the press, vested interests and cases against the MMR. […]

[…] Under the new law the Secretary of State can only object to a JCVI recommendation if it is insufficiently backed by evidence of cost-effectiveness. There is no requirement to ensure the vaccinations are safe or to object to or reverse a JCVI recommendation on safety grounds. Freedom of Information documents show that in 1991 the known dangerous Pluserix MMR was withdrawn from supply by the supplier, a GlaxoSmithKline company and the vaccine was not proposed to be withdrawn by the JCVI, Medicines Control Agency, health officials or Government. The Medicines Act licence was continued instead and supply of the proven dangerous vaccine was thereby allowed to be continued to the third world [British Government’s Reckless Disregard for Child Health Safety]. […]

Most people assume that a vaccine is composed of selected viruses in a sterile fluid to which preservatives have been added. Not so.

Vaccines are suspensions derived from the manufacturere’s ‘incubation tanks’ in which the viruses are produced from substrates of mashed bird embryo, minced monkey kidneys or cloned human cells. These suspensions are filtered before use but only to remove particles larger than viruses. The point of the vaccine is that it contains viruses, so these must not be filtered out. Therefore, anything smaller than a virus remains.

How to remove contaminating DNA has caused some concern to the Authorities, which is comforting. In 1986, the US government recommended a weight limit of 100 picograms of contaminating DNA per vaccine dose. However, this has proved so impossible a standard to achieve that they now allow one hundred times that amount, i.e. 10 nanograms per vaccine dose.

In other words, the vaccines we inject into our children are liquids filled with unknown particles, most of which come from cells of non-humans: from chickens, monkeys, and even from cancer cells. Plus the DNA of other species. No wonder so many of them are chronically sick.

firstly, thank you for this excellent journalism that connects the dots.
much of this information is new to me & i intend to talk to my GP & provide him with a link.
i would like to point out Dr Leonard Horowitz’s (In Lies We Trust & Pirates Of The Sacred Spiral) work in this area which is even more shocking & provides damning evidence of a eugenics/ depopulation agenda using vaccinations as a bioterrorist weapon against unsuspecting citizens.

Recently, Jane Burgermeister,http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/04/
an investigative health journalist (BMJ, Reuters Health, The Guardian, Nature) has filed charges with the FBI & Austrian Police against Baxter Pharmaceuticals, U.N. WHO, as well as Barack Obama who has intimate financial links with vaccine companies & has pursued legislation that allow forced vaccination as well as removing any responsibility of vaccine companies to pay damages.
My son was a perfect, healthy happy boy who sang songs & counted to ten at the age of 1 & developed ASD after a vaccination which caused him to have a fever later that day.
Research the science & funding behind vaccination propaganda. I have & it is clear vaccinations are now being used to make people sick, sterile, & as a means of slow burn population reduction. Whatever the intention originally behind them, they are now a weapon of mass destruction used in a crime against humanity unequaled in history. Furthermore, that it can be demonstrated that whoever is behind this, has power to develop, first the virus, distribute & release on populations,control WHO policy, & enforce a media blackout on the true facts regarding swine flu. This kind of power rests only in the highest political & corporate global elite & I ask people to research the claims that I & others are making. Please.

WHERE is the actual paper?? I certainly can’t find it. I undestand if its in japanese, but I still require a link to the actual paper, cause there is no point in debating without concrete evidence.

As an autistic, Im tired of getting bashed by naysayers and defenders of big pharma.

I thought I found a break here.

[ED: Not sure what paper you are asking about You have posted this comment against the story headlined “Secret British MMR Files …….. “. Was this meant to be posted to the “Japanese Data Show Vaccines Cause Autism” story?]

…and I now understand how this result can be achived. Deeply sorry for my impatient comments.

I have demostrated this causality to some in a finnish scince forum, and all I get in response is “no no, thats definetly not causality, just random correlation” or “sales of ice cream raise number of deaths by drowning too.”

So Im back to square one with them. But no matter, the smart ones, ones with actual interest in something else than debunking, and ones with autistic offspring, have now been informed of this. The debunkers can be observed as hostile towards analyzing any causes of ASD, other than genetics, and interested only in upholding official points of view.

Good job on this, thank you kindly.

[ED: You are welcome. These people are causing great harm to children and families with their denialism.]

I’m a medical herbalist and have always been interested in the vaccination debate. It makes me weep that some humans can be so callous towards their fellow humans and inject them with a concoction of poisons. It makes my job as a herbalist very difficult when my patients are casually telling me that they are off to have their flu jabs and cant wait for the swine flu jab. I am trying to offer a holistic and natural approach to their healthcare and am feeling that every step we make forward, the NHS make my patients take two steps backwards. Can we really make a difference? I will try my hardest to help.

[Ed: Good for you. There are many involved in the mainstream pharmaceutical industries who hold herbalists in high regard whilst we have at the same time the efforts made to denigrate what you do. Herbal medicine can be highly effective and has an unrivalled safety record particularly when compared to the high rates of adverse reactions the pharmaceutical industry products have.]

I am appalled at the danger I have put my three children in not knowing ALL the facts on their vaccines! The pamphlet I recieved for MMR had no reference at all to a link with autism or any other disease. I have copied web addresses for a friend whos son regressed at 18 months into autism shortly after his routine booster shots. I an also looking up a local medical herbalist and discontinuing my children’s routine booster schedual! I live in the U.S. I am sickened that my government has harmed children ON PURPOSE just to make a buck.

makes for very interesting reading, how many of these experts saying there isnt a link have had their children vaccinated with the single mmr, or did they opt to have them as separate vaccinatons? my son was a normal, happy child developing brilliantly until 6 months after he had his 1st mmr jab, when he regressed overnight into autism. I refused the 2nd mmr jab, and still have never had it explained to me why my son now has autism, along with language delay and severe challenging aggressive behavioural problems. We put our trust in our health professionals, why cant they do the same?

This has opened my eyes a little bit, only a little though. i’d need more evidence, because as things stand right now, i’m fairly pro-vaccinate. simply on the basis that deaths go down when vaccines go up. I’d rather be autistic than dead mate, sorry if that offends anyone. Would you like to tell the readers of your article how much the death rate from measles/mumps/rubhella has sky-rocketed since the media began the whole ‘anti-vax crap. Last time i checked, the death rate had shot up to 500% more in the last 10 years thanks to your scaremongering stories.

[ED: There is no need to choose between death or autism.

Readers can read all about how the UK death rate from measles etc fell dramatically before the introduction of the vaccines and continued to do so after at the same rate by going here:-

Hello Gentlemen, -and Ladies,
Very Interesting. Very good material and arguments.
..It also is very scary!
The vaccination program by health boards, the Flouridation (medication?) of humans water sources, the FDA grab to control natural foods worldwide coupled with DNA ‘research’ and GM (mutated) food DNA is I am afraid, an indication of the very advanced state of the population reduction program!
(The main elements in this are the Israeli/American/ Bilderberg group.) The Queen was very correct in her statement of “there being dark forces at work!”
With the perpetual war mentality of the corporate masters of the usa who now have free rein now and this so called “global warming” and FIAT currency “Ponzi” scams you can begin to see the organisation behind the complexity of their efforts.

“..Oh if we could perceive the evil web that they do weive!” …Almost akin to the “Matrix”
God Bless.

a very informative website, with good sound information, that every parent, school principal, teacher need to know and to discourage. Here in South Africa, only the polio vaccination is compulsory. In townships where poor sanitation and poor hygiene are problems, the government insists on the MMR… But off course one cannot fight poverty with medicine… same as trying to solve poverty with ARVs in Africa…

It is perhaps the time for truth to told as to the deceit and misinformation that has surrounded this aspect of the drug industry. We are in the miiddle of a public investigation over phone hacking which although outrageous and disgusting has not caused the loss of lives or damage that vaccines have wreaked over the past years. Perhaps too many high ranking people are involved and too much commercial risk is at stake to permit full and accurate disclosure of this scandal.

[…] was answered after the Hannah Poling story broke in the USA in February 2008 [see CHS article here]. Hannah developed an autistic condition after 9 vaccines administered the same day. Under the […]

[…] was answered after the Hannah Poling story broke in the USA in February 2008 [see CHS article here]. Hannah developed an autistic condition after 9 vaccines administered the same day. Under the […]

If you follow Louise L.Hay’s philosophy, that we are all responsible for all of our experiences. Every thought we think is creating our future. The point of power is always in the present moment.
You do not vaccinate your children and do what is good for you !!!!

“I am sickened that my government has harmed children ON PURPOSE just to make a buck.”

Now that we rational humans can agree we have been INTENTIONALLY harmed by “vaccinations” pushed by governments who knew they were harming us, be prepared for a much bigger shock.

The governments who intentionally harmed us with “vaccination”, continue to harm us and will fight forever for the right to keep harming us, were not harming us just to protect a profitable Vaccine Industry. No what is driving this whole “vaccination” debacle is the UN Agenda 21 Depopulation Mandate. “Vaccination” is playing and is slated to keep playing, a LARGE role in depopulation.

You actually make it seem so easy along with your presentation but I to find this topic to be really one thing which I think I would by no means understand. It sort of feels too complicated and extremely huge for me. I’m taking a look ahead on your subsequent submit, I’ll attempt to get the hold of it!

You’d be laughed at in the UK for quoting the Daily Mail as a source for anything. the Mail’s motto is never let the truth get in the way if a good story. Next you’ll be telling us that Aliens are conducting medical research on the back of a Daily Mail article.

[ED: Heh. This troll has popped up elsewhere on CHS telling us all how “scientivally literate” he is. Notice that aside from his inability to spell and his poor grammar, he comes to CHS to disparage and abuse [“You’d be laughed at”, “you’ll be telling us that Aliens are conducting medical research”]. His poor literacy shows in that he clearly has not read this CHS article.

My comment that could not be posted took you to task for the way you are needlessly insulting and also committing exaggerations and things that aren’t correct — I am the 4th generation in my family to be Asperger’s. My great grandfather was never vaccinated, and my grandfather only when he came to this country as a teenager. So please — stop saying there’s no genetics involved. The diagnosis didn’t exist back then (and has been removed from American “medicine”) but the syndrome itself certainly did! All of us are classic Aspies.

There is certainly neurological damage occurring with vaccines — but those are the product, most likely, of the neurotoxic metals used. And the MMR may or may not be causative of something resembling autism; what we know is that the MMR affects those of us with autism in certain ways. Likely it’s a genetic predisposition, because we already know that some people are genetically susceptible to developing autism upon exposure to mercury. Genetics keeps popping its head up, so you are foolish to claim that it’s all vaccine and no genetics. That’s just as wrongheaded as their claim that it’s all genetics and no vaccine.

[ED: The term genetic is inappropriate for any disease because all disease is “genetic”. Diseases are disorders of organisms which are genetic. But that does not mean disease is caused by genes. The use of the term “genetic” is wholly misleading.

The more appropriate terms are “internal” and “external”. Haemophilia as a disease is “internal”.

Your individual case history may be relevant but does not establish the predominant position.]

[…] was answered after the Hannah Poling story broke in the USA in February 2008 [see CHS article here]. Hannah developed an autistic condition after 9 vaccines administered the same day. Under the […]