Feds propose law to ease restrictions on transporting firearms

OTTAWA — The Conservative government is proposing new legislation that would ease restrictions on transporting firearms, make firearms-safety courses mandatory for first-time gun owners and prevent people convicted of spousal assault from legally owning guns.

Under the government’s proposed Common Sense Firearms Licensing Act, gun owners who allow their weapon permits to lapse will be given a grace period to renew them.

While their permits are expired, firearms owners won’t be allowed to buy new guns or ammunition, but would no longer face possible jail time as a result of the expiry.

“We will create a grace period at the end of the five-year licence to stop people from immediately becoming criminalized for paperwork errors,” Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney said as he announced the proposed overhaul at a shooting range in northern Ontario.

“The threat of prison time for something you were legally authorized to possess the previous day is not acceptable.”

The length of the grace period has not yet been specified.

The government also plans to combine two licences currently needed to own and use firearms — the possession and acquisition licences.

Once the law is passed, there will be just one licence required, said Blaney.

“We are intending to announce the merging of those two licences so there’s one single licence in this country for possession and acquisition of firearms,” he said.

The proposed legislation would also see Ottawa to take on powers currently held by some provincial authorities.

Under the proposed law, gun owners would also be permitted to transport weapons as part of their firearms licence.

Currently, gun owners in Ontario, Quebec and P.E.I. have to apply to their provincial chief firearms officer when they want to transport a restricted or prohibited weapon.

Changes being proposed to the Criminal Code would also “strengthen firearms prohibitions for those who are convicted of domestic violence offences,” said the minister.

Blaney also announced Wednesday his department is extending the amnesty for owners of Swiss Arms and CZ 858 rifles until March 14, 2016. The Mounties prohibited the rifles earlier this year, an action that Blaney said turned law-abiding citizens into criminals overnight.

A group that advocates for responsible gun ownership welcomed the proposals.

“This is a good sign for trustworthy Canadian gun owners,” said Pyper Unitt, co-founder and vice chair of the Canadian Firearms Institute. “It means that the Conservative government is beginning to listen to our concerns and (the changes) can be viewed as a small step in the right direction.”

“Blaney said that, once the law is passed, there will be just one licence required.”

He didn’t. He said there would be no Possession Only Licenses (POL) only Possession and Acquisition Licenses (PAL). There are two types of these one for restricted and prohibited firearms and one for only non-registered firearms. To get the former the applicant must take a longer version of the safety course.

He also announced that applicants couldn’t challenge the safety test exam. That seems to mean that cops and soldiers and other people who have received firearms safety training elsewhere will have to take the classroom course. I don’t know why they would do this. It’s a bit like insisting that immigrants who driven for years in their home country must take drivers ed before they can take the road test here,

“Currently, gun owners in Ontario, Quebec and P.E.I. have to apply to their provincial chief firearms officer when they want to transport a restricted or prohibited weapon”

Owners of restricted and prohibited firearms in every province must apply for separate ATTs. Some Firearms Offices are run by the provinces and some by the RCMP but the requirement is the same. ATTs can be issued for single events i.e. (go to gunsmith) or long term to go to ranges.

“Blaney also announced Wednesday his department is extending the amnesty for owners of Swiss Arms and CZ 858 rifles.”

He didn’t. He said he was changing the rules for the amnesty to allow them to be shot. This isn’t good enough. Currently owners of other prohibited rifles may not take them target shooting on approved ranges. That is both unjust and illogical. The entire classification system needs to be scrapped.

Notice: Your email may not yet have been verified. Please check your email, click the link to verify your address, and then submit your comment. If you can't find this email, access your profile editor to re-send the confirmation email. You must have a verified email to submit a comment. Once you have done so, check again.

Sign In / Sign Up

With your existing account from

With an email account

Commenters who signed up before June 26th, 2014 will have to reregister on our new, social-friendly login system. The good news? The process should only take a few minutes, and you're welcome to use the same email address.

Almost Done!

Please confirm the information below before signing up.

{* #socialRegistrationForm *}
{* socialRegistration_firstName *}
{* socialRegistration_lastName *}
{* socialRegistration_emailAddress *}
{* socialRegistration_displayName *}
By clicking "Create Account", I confirm that I have read and understood each of the website terms of service and privacy policy and that I agree to be bound by them.