For the money, get a Soviet SKS. Accurate and deadly to 500 yards and they will fire with 10 pounds of mud in the action. The Soviet SKS also has a
chrome lined barrel. The AK gives up accuracy for rate of fire.

The Second Amendment and it's explicit language demands and insists that citizenry have ownership of firearms in order to function as a militia
(military) when necessary. It does not preclude other functions such as hunting and self defense. Another consideration is that our Founding Fathers
were blessed with an interesting advantage over our English tormentors... That the firearms used by the colonist militias and Continental Army were
vastly superior to the king's army; a distinction that the Framers clearly understood, and would embrace current civilian ownership of military issue
weaponry without equivocation, as the Second Amendment is the only thing that stands between what little liberty we have left, and the tyranny that
those in power wish to impose.

When it comes time to refresh a certain parched tree, the citizenry must have the very finest instruments to accomplish that task...

originally posted by: Mirthful Me
That the firearms used by the colonist militias and Continental Army were vastly superior to the king's army; a distinction that the Framers clearly
understood, and would embrace current civilian ownership of military issue weaponry without equivocation...

Where is the line drawn? Nukes? Bio weapons. Or just something with gunpowder? Like a huge bomb? Military stuff Bro.

.... as the Second Amendment is the only thing that stands between what little liberty we have left, and the tyranny that those in power wish
to impose.

Man, those last two lines of the Star Spangled Banner really don't play today. Land of the free? Home of the brave? Looks like fear to me.

The Second Amendment and it's explicit language demands and insists that citizenry have ownership of firearms in order to function as a militia
(military) when necessary. It does not preclude other functions such as hunting and self defense. Another consideration is that our Founding Fathers
were blessed with an interesting advantage over our English tormentors... That the firearms used by the colonist militias and Continental Army were
vastly superior to the king's army; a distinction that the Framers clearly understood, and would embrace current civilian ownership of military issue
weaponry without equivocation, as the Second Amendment is the only thing that stands between what little liberty we have left, and the tyranny that
those in power wish to impose.

When it comes time to refresh a certain parched tree, the citizenry must have the very finest instruments to accomplish that task...

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.