There is another design possibility using the Townsend Brown dielectric approach, sandwiching two utron halves together with a di-electric in the middle. The utrons can be constructed with some power-cell / capacitor aspect, actually having some guts to assist in the self-regeneration wiring of the OTC-X1, while employing the di-electric electrogravity aspect of what Townsend Brown had discovered.

This is a design alternative.

This is such a great idea in fact! I honestly wasn't the first to conceive of this. But this is great. Multiple stages of di-electric and electret plate stacks made to hold some capacitance and generate a gravity force when electrically charged is a more known approach than mercury-plasma, and perhaps a more simplistic approach that could even be safer.

I love this concept!

Plus .. I just realized this .. the vertical core inductively collides positive and negative energy in the engine because of the rotating magnetic fields. So ... we may just have a winning design for a warp drive ship. Otherwise the vertical core will have to be replaced with a different design which uses only negative energy from an exotic generator, but I'm hoping it won't come down to that. Regardless, this perhaps "maxes out" the design capacity; or rather we have reached the full spectrum of this engine configuration design, ready to build and to test, able to test multiple gravity drive technologies all in the same essential configuration of the LAU-X3.

Rotational, gyrating, spin dynamics of the di-electric in the utrons are taken into consideration in an overall energy field construction, created electro-mechanically mainly. The Brown di-electric used in the utrons could very well provide a safer energy field than using mercury. This should be enough to convince others of the proposal to construct such a marvel, in that it is very likely to work. And if not, there is more than enough information now, including knowledge of the exotic negative energy power source, to put this project well beyond the scope of mere speculation. ​

​

I'm adding to this article (9/12/17)

Mercury Plasma has given us results. Nassim Haramein had experimented with magnetically contained mercury toroid - donut shapes, spun at high velocity and charged at certain frequencies. It is said that he warped the walls of his house from doing this. Mercury-plasma type of systems have demonstrated levitation ability, and the TR-3B (the patent was just released not too long ago, also) uses mercury-plasma systems.

Mercury plasma is more unknown, but the physics have been around since the 1930's used in Die Glocke created by Dr. Schumann, of which the Schumann resonance of Earth was named after. Dr. Schumann said "The energy should flow like water (hydrodynamics) over the hull." You know he literally means the energy physically feels like electrical water (chi) running over the hull.

That is why it is called "magnetohydrodynamics" -- the magnetic energy flowing like water over the hull of the ship -- negative ion particles, or rather negative energy chi.

It becomes pointless after a time to try to "explain the physics" of something that was done in the past on multiple occasion (just covered up), and we have a pretty good understanding of how to duplicated it, regardless. Understanding how a mercury-plasma system can work in conjunction with negative energy opens up a lot of doors to a rediscovery of possibilities.

Mercury-plasma systems have been discussed throughout this website on pages like "warp drive engineering" and "warp drive news." It's almost as good as metalized hydrogen, something that has metalic properties, but is a gas/vapor OR liquid medium to be put into motion. It is the electrical motion (and acceleration) of mass involved which is what gives mercury-plasma (or metalized hydrogen) its favorable properties in antigravity / hyperdrive / warp drive applications.

It is accepted that Otis T. Carr used mercury in his utrons. There is a design alternative to use di-electric plates instead. Both systems are somewhat compatible, and similar.

Application of mercury-plasma in an utron is to note: The mercury spins inside the spinning utron, moving in spirals and vortex flows, and has fluidic properties that allows for that type of negative energy electrical vortex motion.

​The utron with mercury would have a hollow spherical cavity, not filled completely with mercury so the liquid will take a toroid shape when the utron spins and revolves. Most likely, Carr pulled a vacuum on the mercury in the utron (which is why he reported a pressure leak in an utron which sent him to the hospital for mercury exposure).

​​The new upcoming release of the Tesla-tower Ley-line active vacuum negative energy power production system will shed a lot more light on what we're working with, as far as an understanding and identification and duplication of negative energy power generating systems.

Indeed the simplest of all electrogravity warp drive designs is just using a negative energy generator in an aerodynamic saucer-shaped hull that charges the hull with energy (di-electrostatic propulsion), inducing its own motion and spacetime frequency field (warp drive bubble). My mentor had achieved this in Oregon years ago with just an aeroframe, and a MEG-style negative energy generator. He hooked up LED's and flew it via remote control around over the skies of three nearby small towns. It made the newspapers, too. That's all the Outer ring assembly on the LAU-X4 is in essence -- just a modified version of multiple MEG (motionless electromagnetic generators) arranged around in a circle for power. The MEG uses a tuned magnet (made so the magnet's frequency matches the Schumann resonance) instead of a di-electric material, but it doesn't mean a di-electric can't also be used along with a permanent magnet material. That's the whole idea of the outer ring, really nothing too complex.

​

How negative energy applies to the utrons, is that the faster their acceleration frequency, the more negative gravity they generate -- mass reduction. Gravity is electromagnetic.

The utrons separate an exotic (negative-energy) vacuum charge to their points, building up tremendous energy through the vacuum collapse of magneto-static energy.

An interesting aspect about negative energy is that it can only be just one pole -- monopolar energy. Negative energy can be transformed to positive energy (having polarity -- a cathode and anode), and back to negative polarity. In it's negative state, it is a longitudinal wave (and traveling over the surface of the utron), traveling superconductively and simultaneously, so needless to say its frequency is naturally much higher than electromagnetic waves. Also it will pull more energy from the universe (from the active vacuum), traveling faster and with much more energy.

The tight rope analogy is important. If you tug on one end of a tight rope, the person at the other end feels it instantly (longitudinal and parallel waves). Otherwise, if you shake your end of a loose rope, it takes time for the ripple to travel to the other end (electromagnetic waves).

Also, negative energy can have zero polarity, and yet have electrical voltage.

There are multiple wave shapes associated with negative energy however, to be released in the future as downloadables.

​The utrons are not unlike radio-wave transformer shapes. How they are shaped is how the energy is directed, in perfect paradox. Mono-polar energy can be sent along a wire in either polarity of positive or negative; but the negative polarity of energy is the other side of energy as we know it, behaving exactly the opposite as ordinary electricity, as the universal natural form of electricity that is abundant and touches all life.

​As far as electrogravity produced with a di-electrostatic is concerned, The negative of energy builds up much more energy through the vacuum, not in consuming energy, but pulling energy from the vacuum, through the "eye" so to speak. More energy is built up but in negative amps, even with positive voltage; the amount of energy generation exceeds the ratio of mass that creates the field of energy. Mass is transferred through energy wave shapes as a paradox. The less dense the energy is, the more amount of voltage and amps there are, making the energy more dense, but because it is so tiny (the vacuum collapse state), the universe gives so much energy to it, so it's a real paradox.

The energy becomes just as strong as the mass that creates it; and yet paradoxically it is not the mass that creates it, because the energy comes from the vacuum, from the non-physical. But to simplify, it is the energy that has the strength, not the mass. The energy can move the mass into negative density through its negative energy field. The utrons merely direct that energy, and the di-electrostatic plates and electromagnets have their functions. So as long as the physics of negative energy are understood, the OTC-X1 can be built correctly.

​Using negative energy is the key. Just charging the di-electrostatic plates on the accumulator frame with negative energy alone is going to move the craft. The utrons however . . . they are specifically for the use of negative energy.

A lot of likes on this article. One might think vaporized mercury in a vacuum would be hard-pressed to conduct magneto-electrostatic current with the air pumped out, but a plasma jar can do it. The Townsend Brown dielectric approach might be safer. No matter how the electro-inertial utron is designed, don't let those details limit your understanding otherwise of how everything works overall.

The general consensus appears to favor the Townsend Brown approach, which was what I originally had in mind.

Reply

LAU

12/1/2016 01:41:36 pm

Thank You. Unity.

Reply

Leave a Reply.

LAU

Updates and Design Improvements; Further Understanding and Applicability