Finnish Trade and Development Minister Paavo Väyrynen Says Finland Should Decrease Its Share of Refugees…….

NOTE: [The number of “8 million” refugees is highly inflated, when one considers that it includes the 4+ million fake refugees called the Palestinians. Their actual number hovers around 200 000, the rest are just relatives and distant kin to the remaining number of actual Arab refugees that left their homes for a number of reasons.]

Watching last nights news on TV, it was interesting to hear the EU’s official policy on getting its member states to increase their quota of refugees they take in yearly. Really, it was quite an amazing appeal by MTV3, the ‘report’ carried with it the same feel of a Jerry Lewis telethon. But not all are buying it, like for example, Minister of Trade and Development, Paavo Väyrynen, who stated on the same station’s morning channel that:

Paavo Väyrynen: Finland has a different interpretation of immigration than other member states. We have received a great number of wrongful applications for refugee status, and since there has been these wrongful expenditures, the Ministry of the Interior plans to count these funds, even more so than before, as a part of developmental aid.

MTV3: Well in practice, can’t this be understood that you believe that too many refugee applicants are coming to Finland?

Paavo Väyrynen: Yes. The whole government last Spring looked at it in that way, that there were too many false applicants, who have no excuse for coming here and have created financial burdens. The Finnish policies are too slack.

MTV3: In the newspaper Aamulehti, the whole front page was about the EU pressuring member states to increase the fixed number of refugees, what do you say about that?

Paavo Väyrynen: You can say that pressure on Finland will grow to increase the fixed number of refugees, and it’s an incredible claim to say that most EU member states don’t have a fixed number for refugees. Finland’s fixed number of 750 refugees a year is one of the highest in the EU when calculated proportionally, so we don’t have any reason to increase the fixed number of refugees, on the contrary, the fixed number should be reduced, then it would be in line with other EU countries.

MTV3: How much of aid is really for humanitarian reasons, caring for the needs of others?

Paavo Väyrynen:Some look at this as “some kind of social welfare that goes on endlessly”, in my opinion, the right understanding is for a lasting development that lifts people from poverty that will eliminate the need for this kind of aid.

Sanity found in the ranks of the Central Party. KGS

NOTE: Contrary to what the MTV report stated, it is indeed a matter of sovereignty to determine who, and from where, and how many, will enter the borders of the state. This recent initiative by Brussels should be viewed in light of its traditional strong arm tactics to get the member states to come into step with the offical line. So MTV3’s ‘assurances’ need to be taken with a grain of salt.

Britain will be asked to accept thousands more refugees a year as part of moves by Brussels towards a single immigration and asylum policy across the EU.

Many will come from war zones such as Somalia and Sudan under plans for a ‘Joint EU Resettlement Programme’.

In an attempt to reduce public concern about the cost, Britain will be offered 4,000 euros (£3,500) for every refugee it accepts.

The project, launched by European Commission vice-president Jacques Barrot yesterday, is widely seen as the first part of a Brussels blueprint to roll out a common immigration and asylum policy across the EU.

Later this month the Commission will publish plans for immigration ‘burden sharing’, which could see asylum seekers who land in EU countries such as Italy and Malta moved to the UK.

A spokesman said yesterday that this was a ‘pressing issue’ for the EU.

[…]

Conservative immigration spokesman Damian Green last night said it was vital that the UK kept control of the total number of immigrants entering the country, rather than handing power to Brussels.

He said co- operation on dealing with refugees should depend on other EU countries helping to stop the flow of illegal immigrants to Britain.

Mr Green said: ‘There is nothing wrong with trying to plan the numbers of successful refugees – anything would be better than the chaos Britain’s system has suffered in recent years.

‘But Britain could only take part if we had control of the numbers arriving here under the scheme, and if other countries co-operate more in preventing the build-up of asylum seekers at Calais.’

Stephen Booth, of think-tank Open Europe, said handing over control of immigration and asylum policy risked creating a public backlash.

He added: ‘Asylum policy is a sensitive issue for the public and national governments therefore need to be clear and open about where EU asylum policy is heading in order to avoid a backlash from their citizens.’

Britain is one of only ten EU countries to operate a formal refugee resettlement programme.

Over the past five years the UK has accepted 2,500 refugees on top of the number coming in through the wider immigration and asylum system

Post navigation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign me up for the newsletter!

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Melting pot societies are the only way to secure the individual…

Multiculturalism is a gross failure. Assimilation, where celebrating one’s own heritage but as a full member of the dominant culture, wins.

There Is No Such Thing As White Cultural Heritage. The West’s Legacy Is Open To All…

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

Trending Israeli News…

IDF prepares to demolish Jerusalem terrorist's house
Army units make initial preparations for demolition of terrorist's house, following murder of Adiel Coleman in the Old City of Jerusalem.Man murdered in Jerusalem attack: Adiel Kolman
Jewish man who was murdered in attack in the Old City of Jerusalem identified as Adiel Kolman, a resident of Kochav Hashahar.Murderer of Rabbi Itamar Ben Gal caught
Israeli forces arrest Israeli Arab responsible for the murder of Rabbi Itamar Ben Gal near Ariel last month.ISRAELI AIR FORCE STRIKES HAMAS TERROR TARGET IN GAZA STRIP
"The attack was carried out in response to the placement of explosive devices on the border fence."

SECULARISM AND RELIGION: THE ONSLAUGHT AGAINST THE WEST’S MORAL CODES

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

Middle East expert Mordechai Kedar: To talk of peace in the Middle East is akin to begging to keep your head connected to your shoulders…

What mainstream Islam really teaches, what they believe…

Trending European News..

SAS sniper kills senior ISIS fighter with 'one in a million' night-time headshot from a mile away close to the Syrian border
SAS sniper kills senior ISIS fighter with 'one in a million' shot
The marksman is said to have killed the terrorist with a 'head shot' close to the Syrian border having been given a window of just 15 seconds. He is understood to be a sergeant with the SAS G-Sqaudron and a veteran of operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan, where he is understood to have recorded as many as 100 kills.Rees-Mogg’s Ultimatum to May: If Britain Bends to EU on Trade Policy It Will Become ‘Joke Nation’Report: Czechs Mulling Moving Embassy to Jerusalem
TEL AVIV – The Czech Republic has begun investigating the possibility of following the U.S.’s lead and moving its embassy to Jerusalem as a result of a diplomatic campaign waged by Israel, Channel 10 reported on Saturday.Danish Social Democrat leader faces criticism after 'using ethnicity' in Facebook debate
Mette Frederiksen has been criticised after she appeared to suggest a commenter was less entitled to take part in debate because of her immigrant background.

Daniel Greenfield explains Islam 101:

"Every devout Muslim is an "Islamist". Islam is not a personal religion. It is a religion of the public space. A "moderate" Muslim would have to reject Islam as a religion of the public space, as theocracy, and that secularism would be a rejection of Islam.

Nothing in Islam exists apart from anything else. While liberals view culture and religion as a buffet that they can pick and choose from, it is a single integrated system. If you accept one part, you must accept the whole. Once you accept any aspect of Islam, you must accept its legal system and once you accept that, you must accept its governance and once you accept that, you lose your rights.''

Trending Middle East News…

Republican Senator expects Trump to pull out of Iran deal
Senator Bob Corker says he expects Trump to pull out of the Iran nuclear agreement in May.Greenblatt: Hamas is burying Gaza's future
Trump’s envoy condemns Samaria terrorist attack, blasts Hamas for welcoming it.Analysis: Here's how to deal with the barbaric Syrian regime
Electrocuting children, turning hospitals into slaughterhouses, using chemical weaponry - how long can this be allowed to continue?(Thanks to Obama for giving a time date for US departure)
Analysts: Iraq War Legacy Marked by Failure, Some Success

Jenin: Massacring Truth (This documentary was made long before the term #FakeNews got started…