BIALOSTOK v. APKER

The opinion of the court was delivered by: RICHARD HOLWELL, District Judge

OPINION AND ORDER

Having received and considered petitioner's motion for
reconsideration, the Court reaffirms its prior holding that
petitioner's CCC placement date was set pursuant to the so-called
"2005 Policy". See Bialostok v. Apker, 2005 WL 1946480, *1 n. 5
(S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2005). The Court also reaffirms its holding
that the 2005 Policy is a valid exercise of the BOP's discretion
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b) and 3624(c). Id., at *4-*5.
Accordingly, petitioner's motion [13] is denied.

Our website includes the main text of the court's opinion but does not include the
docket number, case citation or footnotes. Upon purchase, docket numbers and/or
citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a legal proceeding.
Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.