PlayStation 4 and Xbox One have recently been release in the United States, and consumers have been lining up at the doors to get their hands on the latest and greatest of the video game consoles. It is an exciting time in the gaming world. These systems bring enhanced graphics, smoother animations, and other great features (i.e., remote play, enhanced television, etc...).

Both of these systems have been out for a few weeks now and my question to you as a gamer is "should we be excited and jump on the bandwagon?", also "is it worth it?". I'm extremely optimistic that these consoles will continue to bring amazing offerings to the plate. They have already shown they can do so. Graphics/Animations in titles such as Killzone: Shadowfall, Ryse: Son of Rome, and Forza have easily shifted my confidence that these both are great products. But, why can I not bring myself to buy the product (assuming there were any available)? Honestly, I believe that the better offerings will come in the next few years. Games such as The Division, Uncharted, Titanfall, The Order: 1886, etc. will not come out until the latter half of 2014 and beyond. The launch titles definitely display stellar quality and workmanship, but I cannot bring myself to be set back $400-$500 for such a miniscule library of offerings.

All things set aside, I am still satisfied with my PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. They're extremely great consoles and I am continuing to enjoy what they have to offer. Games such as Beyond: Two Souls, Gears of War Judgement, etc. have continued to keep my attention and enjoy what I already have.

What do you think? Do you believe that these are systems that you should be an early adopter of? Do you think that we should continue to savor what we have before upgrading? Give me your thoughts and opinions in the comment section below. Thanks for reading!

Is there such thing as a true gamer? I may be hitting a few nerves when I say no. Instead, may I suggest there are different tiers of "gamers". This is separated between the casual gamers and hardcore gamers. Non-gamers are the people who do not have any interest in video games whatsoever. Casual gamers may occasionally play a game on the console, but tend to stick with the mobile and online PC games. They are fairly self-explanatory with what they do. They play games casually.

Now, something that definitely strike a nerve is "what makes a hardcore gamer"? Is it someone who strictly dedicates his/her time to a single game become near pro? Is it a player who is plays anything and everything? Or, is it a person who plays games hours on end in the basement of their mothers house? In my opinion, I think that all of the above qualify as a "hardcore gamer". I believe that there are "hardcore gamers" of all ages, shapes, sizes, and genders. I believe that "hardcore gamers" can focus on everything from consoles, PC's, Macs, and even mobile games.

Games are games. They are meant to be played by anyone and everyone. Yes, even mobile games can be for everyone assuming you enjoy that particular game. For example, The Walking Dead was a great experience on the iPad. That's definitely a stretch from the Angry Birds norm.

Give me your opinions. What do you think separates the non-gamers, casual-gamers, and hardcore-gamers?

The other day I went through my library of games and decided to write down the list of games that I have not played completely through as far single player is concerned. I came across I'm assuming about 22 different games! Oh man, did that make my heart break. Not only have I not experienced at least 22 of my own games, but on top of that, think of all the magnificent games that are out on the shelfs that I have not tapped the potential of either?! I hope I am not the only one with this problem, but I think I may be Video Game ADD!