Decline of religious freedom
in parts of Europe

In the U.S., a wall of separation has been established between church and state. Thus,
the state and its institutions remain religiously neutral. The government promotes neither
religion nor secularism. Church and state try to keep out of each others' path. This is
not the situation throughout much of Europe, where most countries have a two (sometimes
three) tiered religious system. Some denominations and religions are given special
privileges, while others can be actively discriminated against. Many countries have a
single recognized state religion which receives special status for cultural and historical
reasons. A second group of religions, (e.g. Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, etc) are
recognized, but may be given a lower status. The lowest level is populated by small
religious groups, which the state may not recognize as religious institutions. These may
be regarded as cults or sects, and are sometimes allowed few freedoms. 1

European threats to freedom of religion, speech and assembly are very different from
those in North America. In the U.S. and Canada, the main, concentrated attacks on new
religious movements come from:

The anti-cult movement (ACM). These groups target new religious
movements, believing them to be largely criminal, mind-controlling, dangerous cults. The influence of the ACM has been in decline for a few years,
partly because of. recent court rulings which have linked them to criminal activities. Law
suites drove the largest ACM group, the Cult Awareness Network,
into bankrupcy. 2

The counter-cult movement (CCM). These groups are largely
conservative Christian ministries which hold traditional, historical religious
doctrines. They target fellow Christian faith groups whose theology deviates from their
own. Although there are many hundreds of CCM groups, most are quite small and often target
only a single non-orthodox faith group. Their influence is not great outside of the
Evangelical Christianity community.

In much of Europe, there appears to a gradual improvement in religious freedom and
tolerance. New religious movements are largely ignored. However the anti-cult movement
appears to have taken hold in a few countries, notably: Belgium, France, Germany, Greece and Russia. Governments in these
countries are now spreading the ACM message. They have inspired religious hysteria,
mounted economic attacks on faith groups, and spread heavily biased religious propaganda.

Sponsored link:

"The International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights is a self-governing
group of non-governmental, not-for-profit organizations that act to protect human rights
throughout Europe, North America, and the Central Asian republics formed from the
territories of the former Soviet Union. A primary specific goal is to monitor compliance
with the human rights provisions of the Helsinki Final Act and its Follow-up Documents."3 They are based in Vienna, Austria. The IHF supports and provides liaison with
thirty-four member "Helsinki committees" in various European and North
American countries.

They issue annual reports describing human rights abuses in dozens of countries. Their
reports issued in early 1998 discussed a number of abuses directed against new and
minority religions:

Annual Reports: IHF Criticism with respect
to religion

"The Roma [a.k.a. Gypsies] continued to fall victim to
the most flagrant discrimination in all spheres of life and often whole communities were
forcefully relocated."

Media engaged in hate speech, victimizing religious minorities; this was often supported
by the government

On 1998-OCT-23, the IHF issued a statement: "Human Rights Violations in Some
OSCE States at 'Crisis Levels' "4 (OSCE refers to
the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe.) They concluded
that "Virtually no OSCE signatory State conforms completely to its Helsinki human
rights commitments. But some members violate those commitments at crisis levels, which
truly threaten security." Most of the brutal repression by member states relates
to a "...continuing trend of hostility towards immigrants, refugees, and members
of minority groups in most other nations..." with the Yugoslavia being the worse
offender. Some of the infractions of human rights that they noted in their summary report
are in the area of religion:

The Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs of the European Parliament
prepared a report "Resolution on Cults in the European Union" 6It was scheduled to be voted upon by the Parliament during 1998-JAN. It was opposed
by both the anti-cult movement (who felt that it was too weak) and by religious liberty
activists who felt that the topic did not lie within the jurisdiction of the European
Parliament. The report is now in limbo. The report appears to have used the term
"cult" to mean any new or small religious group. Since "cult" is such
a vicious snarl word in North America, we have replaced it with "NRM" (New
Religious Movement).

Some items raised in the report are:

The term "NTM" has no legal definition; the word does not imply a negative
value judgement.

Organizing a "NRM" is a fundamental right derived from the "...freedoms
of religion, conscience, thought and assembly."

People join NRMs because they long for "meaning and purpose in life."

There is a potential danger that some NRMs may damage some individuals' "mental
and physical integrity or their social and financial standing"

Only one state has produced a survey of NRM membership, and it found that the total
membership of all NRMs is very small.

Most states in the Union do not consider NRMs to be a significant problem

NRMs pose no danger to democratic institutions

Specific federal legislation against NRMs is inappropriate

There is no need to develop a common European policy against NRMs.

NRMs are problematic only "when they threaten public order and/or the standard
civil liberties"

NRMs should not be penalized, unless they engage in illegal activities.

Governments should take action against NRMs only if they negatively "...affect
a person's physical and mental integrity or the social and financial standing..."

Some NRMs offer psychological services. ** Legislation should be checked to make certain that it is adequate.

Governments should use the same criteria in dealing with a religious group as with a
secular group.

States should provide support structures for persons who leave NRMs, and their families.

Unbiased information, education, and advice should be available to the public and school
students.

NRM activity may be on the increase. A Europe-wide survey is worthwhile.

The report expressed concern that some states are discouraging or banning NRM members
from the civil service

In the U.S. and Canada, religious discrimination can be fought through the court
system, up to the country's Supreme Court. Among member states of the Council of
Europe cases can be appealed to the European Court in Strasbourg when all attempts at
the national level have failed. There have been some remarkable decisions by that court.
For example, the Greek constitution criminalized religious
proselytizing, unless you are promoting the state religion of Greek Orthodoxy. Anyone
wishing to operate a place of worship had to obtain a permit from the local Greek Orthodox
bishop. Cases have been fought by Jehovah's Witnesses, Evangelical Christians and
Pentecostal Christians to the Greek Supreme Court and finally to the European Court of
Human Rights in Strausbourg. They have been successful in overturning the decision of
the highest court in their own country.