This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – Canadian Luke, DavidPostill, Nifle, Kevin Panko, mdpc

Looking at Mendy's answer, looks like you would be better off heading back to Firefox.
– UrdaFeb 17 '10 at 19:41

4

@Urda: nah..I guess I will just stick with Chrome (long-time Firefox converted to Chrome). Have you tried its speed recently? It really is faster than Firefox (based on my experience).
– sivabudhFeb 18 '10 at 0:10

a poor program if you want do download lots of files to the same folder (which is usually the case)
– GirardiMay 4 '12 at 3:31

2

Not as slick as DownThemAll - I will just launch FF for the occasions when I need mass downloads. However, after a few tests, it works pretty well (in spite of the Chrome Store reviews suggesting otherwise).
– brichinsJun 12 '15 at 17:27

Much better answer as of Feb-2013. Still no DownThemAll for firefox though :(
– Andrew BurnsFeb 25 '13 at 18:16

1

I just installed DownloadAll (based on this post) and was initially very impressed - looks like exactly what I want. However I immediately began seeing very odd behavior. Downloads are completing but showing as incomplete, pausing without cause and unable to restart, completing but not removing their temporary .da_ file, etc. Not ready for prime time. Version 1.7.2.
– gibberishMar 13 '13 at 18:48

As of March 2013 - this does what I want, but definitely still needs some polish.
– amicitasMar 26 '13 at 12:49

1

Yes, It got a very similar look but lacks expected functionality
– LifeH2OApr 23 '13 at 7:52

3

Download All currently not in the Chrome Store
– brichinsJun 12 '15 at 17:16

Currently we don't have something like that to chrome, and according to this we won't going to see such add-on in the near future.

While support for some types of extensions was added to Chrome just recently, the extension system in Chrome simply doesn’t cut it. It is only very limited in what you can do. Right now there is no way to port dTa over without loosing the majority of functionality.

@Mendy: thanks for your answer. I shall wait until one day Chrome will improve extension enough that something like dTa can be created.
– sivabudhFeb 18 '10 at 0:09

7

@ShaChris23: (in response to the up comment, I can't comment there as I don't have enough rep) Just use them two. when you want fast browsing use Chrome. and when you want power browsing use Firefox.
– Fitzchak YitzchakiFeb 18 '10 at 0:35

Yup, I agree with you. That's what I think I will do for now. =)
– sivabudhFeb 18 '10 at 18:07

However I didn't like it as you cant filter for file names (at least I couldn't find such an option) and the folder-layout is horrible. You cant even read complete links if they are to long since the window is too small (I used a netbook with a rather small screen though). May do if there are only few links to download, otherwise I cant recommend it due to missing filtering options and miserable layout.