Does the advanced attachment data table reflect all final changes from the Spring patch?

The advanced attachment data page shows the compensator and muzzle brake still have a penalty to SIPS, but the Spring patch notes showed those being removed (modifier set to 1 instead of 1.3/1.125 respectively). Which one is accurate?
Links:Spring patch notesAdvanced attachment data table

The advanced attachment data page shows the compensator and muzzle brake still have a penalty to SIPS, but the Spring patch notes showed those being removed (modifier set to 1 instead of 1.3/1.125 respectively). Which one is accurate?
Links:Spring patch notesAdvanced attachment data table

Yes, it comes in last so far, but that is mostly because I'm making it shoot at 100m ADS - Not Moving as one of the criteria. Even then, between 50-100m Not Moving, when you include Useability, it is only 1.37% worse than the MTAR-21. Within 50m then it even beats the A-91.

Have a look, vs. the A-91 Carbine:

Using it with Muzzle Brake and Compensator is a wash in terms of overall performance. Comp is SLIGHTLY more accurate, while MB is SLIGHTLY more easy to use. Their overall scores are basically tied, with MB just ahead. I guess either can be recommended.

Comparing a PP2K with HB and an A-91 with comp and stubby (as you suggested in an earlier post), at 50m not moving, the A-91 is only better by 4 damage per hitrate. While at 75m and 100m, surprisingly the PP2K does better than the A-91 (I'm pretty damn surprised as well).

And 10m and 50m moving the PP2K also does more damage per hitrate than the A-91. At 25m the A-91 is only better by about half a bullet's damage as well.

In addition, the PP2K has a much larger mag size and substantially less recoil. And it looks hella awesome. So comparing the A-91 to a PDW is of some worth after all, as the PP2K is better (technically, not practically) than the A-91.