Chase systems absolutely can work. There are systems that have been back tested for years which either have one loss or do not have a loss at all. As long as you're willing to put up the juice, you can make a decent amount of coin from it.

Chase systems absolutely can work. There are systems that have been back tested for years which either have one loss or do not have a loss at all. As long as you're willing to put up the juice, you can make a decent amount of coin from it.

It's just data mining. Again, show me a chase that can win in the future,not the past. And when the chase loses then someone puts in another rule that will make it win another 10 years in the past.

You willing to put up the juice. Wager 20 units to win one in some cases.

I am currently following a variation of 8 systems. 7 of which have made me money. The one that has not I have changed to limit the risk (limits profit as well). I am up around 50units even though 5 systems have had losses (2 just started).

Every MLB season I hope to be +100u. This year will probably fall short of that, but it should be my 7th straight profitable MLB season. All thanks to chase systems.

I am currently following a variation of 8 systems. 7 of which have made me money. The one that has not I have changed to limit the risk (limits profit as well). I am up around 50units even though 5 systems have had losses (2 just started).

Every MLB season I hope to be +100u. This year will probably fall short of that, but it should be my 7th straight profitable MLB season. All thanks to chase systems.

If you look through Barts & Ciscos spreadsheets and results for their systems U470 5 run tally etc. most hit on Games 1 & 2 some up to 90% running a (2) game chase to gain one unit is extremely profitable if you quit and that point. you can average the losses on the next one or start again and take the loss. That's the way it worked out in the Past since these methods appear to be very sound.

It's the language of teenage boys trying to mop-up losses in their recreational bid to show a successful so called 'chase system' as you can clearly see, all 5 systems that have been brought to the forefront of discussion have been altered to include additional parameters, not even resembling the original version, nor including any form of backtesting concerning the 'perimeter' version, however, the author of this thread used absurd techniques in his approach to gain a momentary winning edge..

It's the language of teenage boys trying to mop-up losses in their recreational bid to show a successful so called 'chase system' as you can clearly see, all 5 systems that have been brought to the forefront of discussion have been altered to include additional parameters, not even resembling the original version, nor including any form of backtesting concerning the 'perimeter' version, however, the author of this thread used absurd techniques in his approach to gain a momentary winning edge..

Oh, I undestand.

I'm looking for a MLB systems to use in these final weeks but many people change or add or modify parameters and it get so confused to me.