The Jew rules through proxy, that's always been their MO.
They do not want a Jewish leader, such as a U.S. President, as that would make their game too obvious.
All the U.S. presidents are subject to the rule of the Jew.
Read this thread, and check out the videos:https://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...ou-456382.html

"Give me control of a nations money, and I care not who writes it's laws."
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Well, since you brought it up, I would put laws against "hate language" in the same category as laws against "Holocaust denial."

[/b]

True, it doesn't specifically prove that there was no "Holocaust," but it does indicate that if there ever was specific proof that the "Holocaust" didn't happen, such proof would never see the light of day.

Stormfront doesn't seem to have a problem having members talk about it. I have yet to see proof it did not happen. The only thing you have proved to me is that the internet is full of websites denying the holocaust, which makes those laws moot. The proof is that their are a lot of internet geeks with nothing better to do then post bile. Guess they got tired of looking at explicit anime. If it wasn't for all the bile I have to sift through, I would probably be able to find some of the pictures and film clips I have seen over the years. The footage shot by the Nazis themselves. They used to document everything.

So why the need to "micromanage", as you put it, this one, and only this, specific episode of history?

I personally don't feel the need to micromanage anything. If I had to guess why some folks feel the need, I would say it is because they think that will stop it from ever happening again.
Me I like things out in the open. This way I can show it to be false and move on without being sucker punched.

One claim holocaust accepters make is the the Nazis kept extensive records, and these records prove that the holocaust happened. I want to know from anyone, WN or not, what are these records, what are their implications, and how legitimate are they?

All the evidence of the hoax is available at the various hoax trials, including those above. Or even the hoax trails of Nuremberg, or Eichmann.

There is no evidence for, and plenty of evidence against, the hoax as it currently exists. Were Jews mistreated? Sure. Were some jews murdered unjustly? In some large number? Absolutely.

Did the German government want to holyco$t all Jews? No. Did the German government kill Jews in the millions with bug spray? No. Did the Germans have goolie gnashing dogs, Jew-masturbation machines, dogs with poison teeth, bone crushing machines, Jew skin lampshades, Ash Commanders, burning experts that could catch dead jews on fire by wrapping them in the proper combination, or other such nonsense?

No.

So, by what passes for modern understanding of the holyco$t, it never occurred. I hope this does not contribute to your sufferink.

One of the reasons I'm not swayed by the arguments denying the holocaust is because they always seem to be coming from the mouth of a White Nationalist or an extreme Muslim. In fact, I dont think I've ever heard of anybody who isn't a supposed anti-Semite denying the holocaust. Both White Nationalists and extreme Muslims tend to be anti-Semitic and politically motivated. Can it really be that WNs are one of the few groups of people who can see past the big conspiracy. Is everybody else really brainwashed?

Thanks,
Alex.

It's a fair question.

I believe the fundamental reason is that WN's are by nature skeptics. They question the prevailing orthodoxy not just on race, but in a number of other fields as well. The received version of events during the War is by its very nature one of the largest and easiest of the targets in the large field of modern Conventional Wisdom.

Why? Simply because logic and ordinary common-sense tells us that the victors write the history books, and that therefore a history of WW II written by a victorious Axis would read very differently from the one we have today.

Obviously, both versions cannot be correct. Bringing history into accord with the facts, in the words of Harry Elmer Barnes, is the job of honest historians, otherwise known as Revisionists, as opposed to shills for the State, otherwise known as Court Historians.

From Waaay Out West,

--HLM

__________________

As Serenity walked along the avenue, he saw many Functionaries that he recognized, but he didnĺt dare say anything to, salute, or even look at them directly. Any such behavior could be interpreted as sexual harassment by the woman in question, and if a complaint were filed against himŚwell, that could mean weeks or months in a Rehabilitation Center.