Dear all,
I'll suggest we have have a quick call tomorrow to discuss how we can address the points that sandro mentions below.
i.e.
1) contacting AC Reps
2) next steps forward for CR docs, i.e. contacting implementers, completing test suites
For those at ISWC, if you could gather there and in case you can't dial in let us know any ideas
you have to proceed on these points on the mailinglist, that'd be great.
Dial-in data as usual.
Thanks,
Axel
________________________________________
From: Sandro Hawke [sandro@w3.org]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:48 PM
To: SPARQL WG
Subject: SPARQL publications done
BTW, the publications happened, as planned:
Eleven SPARQL 1.1 Specifications Published<http://www.w3.org/News/2012#entry-9624>
http://www.w3.org/News/2012#entry-9624
Next steps?
1. Circulate news of the Proposed Recommendations to any AC Reps you know. We need their feedback. In the "Status of the Document" section there's a link to their "review form". So far, four days into the four week review period, we have reviews from Lex Machina and Garlik. (Thanks Gavin and Steve!)
2. Circulate news of the Candidate Recommendations to anyone who might be implementing, asking for their feedback.
1. SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes<http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/> - defines the semantics of SPARQL queries under entailment regimes such as RDF Schema, OWL, or RIF.
2. SPARQL 1.1 Protocol for RDF<http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol/> - A protocol defining means for conveying arbitrary SPARQL queries and update requests to a SPARQL service.
3. SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol<http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/> - As opposed to the full SPARQL protocol, this specification defines minimal means for managing RDF graph content directly via common HTTP operations.
I'm at ISWC this week, so regrets for tomorrow, if there's a meeting.
-- Sandro