Institute for Information Transmission Problems of Russian Academy of Sciences conducts a survey of cruncher's opinions about Distributed Computing projects. Please rate the projects in questionnaire in one of the following languages:

Good initiative but *please* you have a first page with 9 criteria to rate for the chosen project (Ok...) and next page are the same 9 criteria to rate again with a different notation scale !!! So what, we have to try to "convert" the notation we put in the first page into the 2nd different one ??

This is a nonsense and you are going to loose 90% of the people who made the effort to go for that pool already at this page.

Good initiative but *please* you have a first page with 9 criteria to rate for the chosen project (Ok...) and next page are the same 9 criteria to rate again with a different notation scale !!! So what, we have to try to "convert" the notation we put in the first page into the 2nd different one ??

Questions on page 3 are about how good a selected project by several characteristics, but on next page you can indicate weight of this characteristics, by your opinion.
For example, some crunchers may "say" that "Scientific component of the project" is more important than "Design of the project" and set larger weight, but other crunchers - not. :)

OK I understand the idea but I think it's then quite complicated to answer, it would mean I have to write down the answers I made on the first page and rethink them with the other perspective on the other page... at least all should be presented on one single page so I can answer all together ...

Also having 9 levels of answer for each question is not realistic, 3 or 4 should be a maximum.

After month of poll, colleagues from Institute for Information Transmission Problems summed up the interim results. Figure below shows the averadged opinion about RakeSearch project. May be some funny, but objective!
Also poll was modified - explain smiles added. And the voting continues!