Electoral institutions shape the incentives of governments to rely on distributive measures and to comply with international obligations because of the misalignment they may engender between the collective objectives of a government party and the individual objectives of its members in the legislature. We use this argument to explain the puzzle of unlawful state aid measures in the European Union (EU). Existing theories of EU compliance and implementation offer no convincing explanation to their persistence and patterns. Using data from 2000 to 2012, we find that an increase of district magnitude improves compliance. However, compliance decreases with higher magnitude where either party leaders have no control over the ballot rank or other electoral rules strengthen the incentives to search for a personal vote. We also provide evidence for the effects of electoral reforms on compliance. These results have implications for the broader literature on compliance with international regimes.

Angelova, M., Dannwolf, T. and König, T. (2012) How Robust are Compliance Findings? A Research Synthesis. Journal of European Public Policy19(8): 1269–1291.

Aydin, U. (2007) Promoting Industries in the Global Economy: Subsidies in OECD Countries, 1989 to 1995. Journal of European Public Policy14(1): 115–131.

Aydin, U. and Thomas, K. P. (2012) The Challenges and Trajectories of EU Competition Policy in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of European Integration34(6): 531–547.

Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (1995) What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.

Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.

Berglund, S., Gange, I. and Van Waarden, F. (2006) Mass Production of Law. Routinization in the Transposition of European Directives: A Sociological Institutionalist Account. Journal of European Public Policy13(5): 692–716.

Börzel, T. A., Hofmann, T. and Panke, D. (2012) Caving in or Sitting it Out? Longitudinal Patterns of Non-Compliance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy19(4): 454–471.

Börzel, T. A., Hofmann, T., Panke, D. and Sprungk, C. (2010) Obstinate and Inefficient: Why Member States Do Not Comply With European Law. Comparative Political Studies43(11): 1363–1390.

Cao, X., Prakash, A. and Ward, M. D. (2007) Protecting Jobs in the Age of Globalization: Examining the Relative Salience of Social Welfare and Industrial Subsidies in OECD Countries. International Studies Quarterly51(2): 301–327.

Falkner, G., Hartlapp, M. and Treib, O. (2007) Worlds of Compliance: Why Leading Approaches to European Union Implementation are Only “Sometimes-True Theories”. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 395–416.

Falkner, G., Treib, O. and Holzleithner, E. (2008) Compliance in the Enlarged European Union: Living Rights or Dead Letters?Aldershot: Ashgate.

Franchino, F. and Mainenti, M. (2013) Electoral Institutions and Distributive Policies in Parliamentary Systems: An Application to State Aid Measures in EU Countries. West European Politics36(3): 498–520.

Kaeding, M. (2006) Determinants of Transposition Delay in the European Union. Journal of Public Policy26(3): 229–253.

Kaeding, M. (2008) Lost in Translation or Full Steam Ahead: The Transposition of EU Transport Directives Across Member States. European Union Politics9(1): 115–143.

Kassim, H. and Lyons, B. (2013) The New Political Economy of EU State Aid Policy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade13(1): 1–21.

König, T. and Mäder, L. (2013) Non-Conformable, Partial and Conformable Transposition: A Competing Risk Analysis of the Transposition Process of Directives in the EU15. European Union Politics14(1): 46–69.