This was always decrypted data. I was making tar archives of system
partitions, already decrypted and mounted. So I think, the header can't be
there?
Yves, looking at your e-mail - maybe you can advice me weather and how
should I send some info to debian team? I think some small warning or info
could make a big difference for other people who might try to reattach their
previously encrypted drive to a new debian install.
On 29 October 2011 10:15, Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac at debian.org> wrote:
> On sam., 2011-10-29 at 07:14 +1300, Aleksander Swirski wrote:
> > it's my largest drive, but I will put this one aside and use another
> > computer. i was tired, when i did that, didn't have clear mind. now I
> have
> > no idea, how possibly could I fix this, but it all happened because of
> some
> > mental pressure I felt. so I guess, now it's time to chill out. anyway, i
> > feel bit better because You People :) cared enough to inform me and tried
> to
> > help me. it's greatly appreciated.
>> You said in the initial mail that you had some backup of the system but
> they were a bit old. Are those backup of encrypted or decrypted data? Is
> there a chance you may have the luks header somehwere in your backups?
>> Regards,
> --
> Yves-Alexis
>> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
>dm-crypt at saout.de>http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/attachments/20111030/7f942853/attachment.html>