rickynews
Sure, how about this Fact...There wouldn't even be a discussion on Hobby Lobby's employee health insurance plan coverages if they...
" liked their current plan, then they could keep it"

Well, actually it would still be an issue because up until 2012 their "current plan" covered Plan B and Ella. Although until 2012 they didn't seem
to care about it. Seems to me like once they were backed up by some "Political Think Tanks and their Money" to go against the ACA, they didn't
mind paying for contraception.

However, as far as your statement about "liked their current plan, then they could keep it" obama lie. I agree that was a big fat lie that he got
caught red handed on. But like I pointed out, that still changes nothing.

To your point then (regarding my Michelle Obama example), can you provide evidence that Hobby Lobby has bought products specifically from Chinese
companies or individuals that force abortions in China? If not, then accusing Lobby of that is pure conjecture and speculation and not
based on any evidence or facts.

rickynews
To your point then (regarding my Michelle Obama example), can you provide evidence that Hobby Lobby has bought products specifically from Chinese
companies or individuals that force abortions in China? If not, then accusing Lobby of that is pure conjecture and speculation and not
based on any evidence or facts.

edit on 7-4-2014 by rickynews because: (no reason given)

The China connection wasn't ever my argument so I'll let someone else field that one, although I'm pretty sure that has already been covered in
this thread if I remember correctly.

My argument has been the hypocrisy about them paying into companies manufacturing those drugs and allowing them in their insurance plans up until
2012. The china connection never really interested me much and I haven't looked into it all that closely so I'm not really the one who should be
answering your question about that.

"We're Christians, and we run our business on Christian principles. I've always said that the first two goals of our business are (1) to run our
business in harmony with God's laws, and (2) to focus on people more than money.

LOL!

Being Christians, we don't pay for drugs that might cause abortions, which means that we don't cover emergency contraception, the morning-after
pill or the week-after pill. We believe doing so might end a life after the moment of conception, something that is contrary to our most important
beliefs. It goes against the Biblical principles on which we have run this company since day one."

What biblical principles?

Apparently,when it comes to purchasing cheap goods from Chinese slave labor, Hobby Lobby's "Christian values" are nowhere to be seen. Yet when
it comes to telling its employees how to run their private lives, suddenly, it's "Christian values" time!

Last time I checked, there is no Constitutional right to have Health Care, nor is there a right to get birth control paid for by your employer.

First of all, for the umteenth time, health care insurance coverage isn't free. It's part of a compensation package that the employer pays into,
all well as the employee in payroll premium deductions and through their co-pays. So please stop conflating the issue.

Secondly, you are wrong, birth control, in this situation, is protected by the US Constitution.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and subsequent legislation also declared a strong legislative policy against discrimination in public schools and
colleges which aided in desegregation. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in federally funded programs. Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act prohibits employment discrimination where the employer is engaged in interstate commerce. Congress has passed numerous other laws dealing
with employment discrimination. See Employment Discrimination. www.law.cornell.edu...

In December 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that companies that provided prescription drugs to their employees but didn't
provide birth control were in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prevents discrimination on the basis of sex.

Yeah, because that is why it is before the supreme court and not dismissed, because of the 2000 ruling.

One would think....but no. This is before the SCOTUS because of Barack Obama hatred and the ACA he spearheaded. The ACA incorporates the already
existing precedent established in 1964, in Tittle VII and the subsequent 2000 ruling.

This whole argument is about religious people thinking that their beliefs give them the right to break established codes and laws in order to
discriminate against certain groups of people, whether it be the LGBT community, women, or whoever. It's a very sad sign of the last throes of an
ignorant and bigoted mindset that will be shown to have been on the wrong side of history.

macman
The whole premise is that birth control be provided for "free", regardless if it is over the counter or not.

That's not true. If the company offers prescription coverage (not over the counter), that must include birth control or else it's sexual
discrimination.

In 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that companies that provided insurance for prescription drugs to their employees but
excluded birth control were violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Effective for all new private health plans written on or after August 1, 2012, plans must now cover, without out-of-pocket costs, all FDA-approved
birth control options (to include the pill, Ortho Evra Patch, NuvaRing, IUDs, Implanon and Depo Provera) as well as sterilization procedures
(vasectomies, tubal ligation, Essure, and Adiana). Plans will also allow for patient education and contraceptive counseling for all women of
reproduction age.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.