The funny thing is, Obama and Company used Cambridge Analytica's analytics during his run as well. It wouldn't surprise me if Hillary / Bernie /
everyone else did so too!

Why isn't the MSM calling Obama out for it now, or even back then? Because it's a non-issue. Everyone needs data to target their platforms
demographics. If it isn't Cambridge Analytica, it'll be another source.

No. It's not. Having spent the last 5yrs at a senior-level with one of the largest CRM firms in the country and one of the first Facebook partners,
I assure you it does NOT work this way. A company can upload keyed data TO Facebook and they will model a target population (Custom Audience) against
that data. Facebook will then serve approved content to that audience. Under no circumstances does FB allow data to be downloaded.

You better hope your boss(es) don't see your post, because they will then know that you don't know what you are talking about - common for senior
managers, but most opt to hide their ignorance.

Sure that's what they supposedly do. But this firm seemed to take it a step further in profiling voters and how they think. And then through the trump
campaigns Michael Flynn share their findings with Russia so that they could target their campaign on social media to interfere with our election and
get trump elected.
Know what that is ?
Remember Flynn is now a witness.

Sure that's what they supposedly do. But this firm seemed to take it a step further in profiling voters and how they think. And then through the trump
campaigns Michael Flynn share their findings with Russia so that they could target their campaign on social media to interfere with our election and
get trump elected.
Know what that is ?
Remember Flynn is now a witness.

It's all coming together .

Eh? Profiling voters and how they think has bee a mainstay of political campaigning since elections began, facebook is just another tool for a common
practice. It might all be coming together in your mind (which seems to a very long process of coming together), but I can't see any evidence that data
was sent to Putin's Russia by Trumps campaign to coordinate ad buys and social media posts... can you post the link to that?

The evidence is there if you look.
Lots of trump Russia contacts. Lots of secrets. Lots of deals and lots of loose lips.
Remember Peter Smith. He is a link. As is Roger Stone. I can see where Mueller is likely going with stories published over the past year. Here a
link, there a link. Some stories are behind paywalls. The New York Times and Washington Post for instance. I have them bookmarked. But it's nothing
that wasn't also covered by the news. The secret is not paying attention just to what's happening today.

"Cambridge Analytica was founded by Stephen K. Bannon and Robert Mercer, a wealthy Republican donor who had put at least $15 million into
Cambridge Analytica.

Less noticed has been the work that Cambridge Analytica and its parent company, the SCL Group, has done outside the United States. The operations of
the two companies were set up with a convoluted corporate structure and are deeply intertwined."

The evidence is there if you look.
Lots of trump Russia contacts. Lots of secrets. Lots of deals and lots of loose lips.
Remember Peter Smith. He is a link. As is Roger Stone. I can see where Mueller is likely going with stories published over the past year. Here a
link, there a link. Some stories are behind paywalls. The New York Times and Washington Post for instance. I have them bookmarked. But it's nothing
that wasn't also covered by the news. The secret is not paying attention just to what's happening today.

Then it should be easy for you to source your claim... looking forward to the link.

Let's look on the bright side - Facebook are getting hammered. Their influence is going to shrink...hopefully to the point they go out of business
(we'll see). Quite handy given they were doing their best to censor conservative voices after the 2016 election.

It can't be done. POTUS must be able to fully discharge his office and duties 24/7/365. Nothing, including legal processes, takes precedent over
that.

You can remove him from office then indict him, sure. But it has already been determined that COG is the first and only priority as it pertains to
POTUS. Nothing matters more than President Trump being able to fully discharge the office at all times. It is a national security matter.

Either way, if you'd be happier with President Pence by all means.

I don't think you'd like him very much though..... Get ready for a "Christofascist" government (as you all call him...)

There are no scandals, unlike Obama's term. Just BS made up by bitter clingers like you

Proof? Or it never happened...........

Furthermore, Trump has survived all your "scandals" thus far and will continue to do so for the rest of his Presidency. How's it feel knowing you have
and will fail to end his term early? I put the odds at least 60:40 that he serves year 5, 6, 7 and 8 as well.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.