Joseph: I think your concerns are essentially with the issue resolution
adopted by the WG, and not primarily with the minor wording changed
introduced by my editing of that result. Accordingly, I think that
consideration of your concerns is beyond what I can undertake
independently as an editor, and I have asked the WG to advise on how they
would like to respond to your remaining unease with the specification.
Obviously, we will let you know when any further decisions are reached.
Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
09/09/2002 03:09 PM
Please respond to reagle
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'"
<xmlp-comments@w3.org>
cc: "Hoelzing, Gerd" <gerd.hoelzing@sap.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: Re: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed
I'm not sure if my question has been answered. I'm looking at [3] and the
text reads, "Each SOAP intermediary and the ultimate SOAP receiver MUST
act
in this role and MAY additionally assume zero or more other SOAP roles." I
think the change is that this is supposed to be a definition of the "role
name" instead of the (previous) "role". But it still doesn't seem that
useful a definition to me unless the definition of the NEXT role is that
it's the thing which all SOAP nodes are. However, I suspect the difficulty
here is that there's not a specific location in the specification that
defines what a NEXT agent does, instead it's distributed throughout the
spec...?
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 10:27 pm, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> If the members of the WG believe this does not reflect the intended
> resolution, please let the editors know ASAP. xmlp-comments should be
> deleted from the distribution of any replies to this note. Thank you.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues#x250
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Aug/0034.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part1.xml#soaproles