You could also be an audiophile, but you recognize trifle pertaining to digital technologies. The manufacturing unit copies a significant DVD to extra. Whats the distinction between you doing it and them? nicely ripping it to an MP3, and enthusiastic it again could establish a difference, but if you are cloning the , OR are ripping it to an ISO feature, and burning it again, it will likely be exactly 1:1. should you ration an MP3, and than that particular person portions that MP3, does it be unable to find high quality over years? No! you're copying the MP3, however it is DIGITAL! it's hashed! while , vinyl, and anything analogue, this can be incomparable, but for digital recordings class MP3s, FLAC, AAC, or one thing like CDs, they are digital, and if achieved right, can be copied. Hell, you could start a replica of a copy of a replica, and rerun a hundred instances, and still racket the identical, because every 1sixth bit's a hash of the ones earlier than it for error-Correction. this is the reason really circles wont horsing around, but hairline scratches, or tons of a small number of ones, it wont build a distinction in clamor high quality. There are redundancy, and inappropriateness correction bits inside the audio brook, so smashed s wont miss clatter quality.