Coke vs. Pepsi

In this writing, we will discuss about WACC, EVA, their uses in evaluate a firm's performance and apply into a particular case of comparing performance of Coca Cola and Pepsi based on the past and forecasted data.

1.Definitions of EVA and its strengths and limitationsEconomic value added (EVA) has been getting plenty of attention in recent years as a new form of performance measurement. An increasing number of companies are relying heavily upon EVA to evaluate and reward managers from all functional departments.

So what is EVA?

EVA is a value-based financial performance measure based on Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT), the Invested Capital required to generate that income, and the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). Quite simply, EVA is the after-tax cash flow a firm derives from its invested capital less the cost of that capital. EVA represents the owners' earnings, as opposed to paper profits. The formula to measure EVA is: EVA = NOPAT - (Invested Capital x WACC). (1)

EVA is a dollar amount. If the dollar amount is positive, the company has earned more net operating profit after taxes than the cost of the assets used to generate that profit, in other words, the company has created wealth. If the EVA dollar amount is negative, the company is consuming capital, rather than generating wealth. A company's goal is to have positive and increasing EVA. However, as companies introduce new tools for managing their businesses, it is required that each manager also develops a working knowledge of those tools by discussing not only their definitions but also their strengths and limitations.

Strengths

In order to understand the strengths of EVA, the limitations of a predecessor called return on investment (ROI) must be discussed first. The intent of ROI is to evaluate the success of a company or division by comparing its operating income to its invested capital. ROI can be measured with the following formula:

ROI = Operating Income / Investment

The appeal of ROI is that it controls for size differences across plants or divisions. For example, assume the managers of divisions A and B earned $1,000,000 and $800,000 in operating income respectively. A naive interpretation of that difference would be that the manager of division A outperformed the manager of division B. This viewpoint is naive because the cause of division A's higher income may be its greater size relative to division B. To control this problem, ROI is used to measure each division's income relative to the asset base deployed, thereby standardizing the computation into a ratio while de-emphasizing the absolute amount. The primary limitation of ROI is that it can encourage managers, who are evaluated and rewarded based solely on this measure, to make investment divisions that are in their own best interests, while not being in the best interests of the company as a whole.

We see the following example:

A division has received a proposal from headquarters expand its activities into alternatives A and B. The company has enough funds to finance both projects and has a 10% weighted-average cost of capital. Projected earning and investment for the division are:

Assuming the division manager is compensated based solely on ROI, he will be motivated to proceed with only the alternative B because it would increase the projected ROI of 15% currently being earned in the traditional activities. He would not accept the alternative A because it would lower his projected ROI and negatively affect his performance evaluation and compensation. Conversely, the company would prefer that he accepts both alternatives because each exceeds the 10% cost of capital. Should the division manager be blamed for not being a team...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...Antonio Cesaro - Strategic Management - Section 1 – Coke and Pepsi’s Case
I pledge that I have neither received nor given unauthorized assistance for the completion of this work.
AC
Coke and Pepsi: a century of war in a “five star” industry
The beverage market includes several products that can be divided into two main categories: alcoholic, such as for
example beer, wine, spirits, and non-alcoholic within which, in turn, we can distinguish carbonated soft drinks (CDSs)
and “non carbs” (like milk, coffee, juices, tea, sports drinks, energy drinks and water).
The aim of this essay is to focus on CSDs, especially on the cola segment, and to explain what are the most crucial
features that make them one of the biggest and the most profitable industries both in the United States and in the
world: indeed, although the soft drink industry is growing more slowly respect to the past, its ROIC (return on
invested capital) remains on a high level, more than 30%.
Firs of all, in agreement with Porter’s model, it’s important to identify and “to measure” the five key competitive
forces of the industry, by considering that the production and distribution of CSDs involve suppliers, concentrate
producers, bottlers and retail channels, substitutes.
- As to the industry structure, we can find very competitive oligopoly: indeed there are two centenarian major
companies, Coke and Pepsi, representing more...

...the fierce competitor Pepsi-Cola entered into the market. These 2 companies are the two major players that dominate the consumer beverage (soft-drink) industry. Coke and Pepsi have since been competing to rein the global market in consumer beverages. The market of drinks in the United States alone is valued at more than thirty million dollars annually. With the growth of these two companies, PepsiCo has developed and acquired additional products outside the scope of just the consumer beverage industry, these products have helped the company to increase their exposure and position in the global market. This has not been the case for the Coca Cola Company; they have tried and have failed numerous times at expanding their product and marketing capabilities. Below is a list of key products offered by both Coca Cola and PepsiCo:
PepsiCo Coca Cola
Frito-Lay Brands Gatorade Brands Coca-Cola Brands
Lay's potato chips Gatorade Thirst Quencher A&W
Ruffles potato chips Gatorade Frost Thirst Quencher Coca Cola
Doritos tortilla chips Propel Fitness Water Canada Dry
Tostitos tortilla chips Tropicana Brands Dasani
Fritos corn chips Tropicana Pure Premium juices Diet (varieties)
Cheetos cheese flavored snacks Tropicana Pure Tropics juices Evian
Rold Gold pretzels & snack mix Dole juices (License) Fresca
Cracker Jack candy coated popcorn Quaker Brands Hi-C
Pepsi-Cola Brands Quaker Oatmeal Minute Maid...

...cola giants, Pepsi and Coke, entered the Indian market, they brought with them the cola wars that had become part of global folklore. This case study details the various battles fought in India by the two rivals with its focus on the publicity campaigns where the two sought to steal each other fizz.
The case also outlines battles fought on other fronts - conflicts with bottles, product modifications, attempts to steal the rival's employees and other mini wars. On the whole, the case attempts to provide a comprehensive perspective regarding the dimensions of the cola wars and the direction in which they are heading. One solution to increasing market share is carefully follow consumer wants full fill the consumers’ needs. The next step is to take fast action to develop a product that meets the requirements for that particular region. Both companies cannot just sell one product; if they do they will not succeed. Pepsi have to always be creating and updating their marketing plans and products. The company must be willing to accommodate ‘target markets’. Gaining market share occurs when the company stays one-step ahead of the competition by knowing what the consumer wants. My recommendation is to make sure the company is always doing market research. This way they are able to get as much feedback as possible from consumers.
Problem Statement
While Coke was creating more market channels using their brand...

...When it comes to Pepsi and Coke many people have a preference and most will be able to acknowledge the distinct taste difference. In this taste test however I decided to not simply test whether or not a person could distinguish one cola brand from the other, but instead see if people with a preference could still distinguish a difference even if everyone around them was giving a different answer. I decided to test false consensus along with self-efficacy, self-concept, self-serving bias, hindsight-bias, and attributions.
I chose six participants to help me with this study. Three were labeled confederates and did exactly what I told them to do. The other three each had different roles. One was a Pepsi drinker, one a Coke drinker and the last person did not have a preference nor did they drink pop on a regular basis. The first participant, who was a Pepsi drinker came into my experiment under the assumption that the experiment was simply a taste test in which I had gathered four people to taste one type of cola and say whether it was Coke or Pepsi. The confederates all knew it was Coke but I had already told them to say it was Pepsi. Before the tasting all the “participants” discussed whether or not they thought they could distinguish the difference. The Pepsi drinker seemed to be hesitant saying “well I don’t know for sure if I can...

...Financial Management: Cokevs. Pepsi
BUS 508 – Business Enterprise
June 11, 2011
Financial Management: Cokevs. Pepsi
The purpose of this paper is to analysis companies Coke and Pepsi and determinate (a) which company is better able to pay current liabilities (debt), (b) explain what profitability ratios can tell about a company’s performance and how that information would influence investing decisions, (c) discuss which financial ratios to utilized while examining the company’s most satisfied stockholders, (d) create a list of financial-based guidelines that individuals should follow when selecting to invest and (e) evaluate the single piece of non-financial data most important when deciding to invest or not in a company.
In the world Coke and Pepsi have towered as the two leading brands of beverages. According to Dickinson 2011, Coke and Pepsi were both created before 1900. Coke was invented in Atlanta by pharmacist John Pemberton in 1886. Pepsi also was created by a pharmacist--Caleb Bradham from New Bern, North Carolina, in 1898. Over the years, both companies have seen worldwide expansion of their markets, which include varying lines of beverages, apparel and paraphernalia with their respective logos. Both have grown into longstanding global and social...

...Coke and Pepsi in Russia: In 1972, Pepsi signed an agreement with the Soviet Union which made it the first Western product to be sold to consumers in Russia. This was a landmark agreement and gave Pepsi the first-mover advantage. Presently, Pepsi has 23 plants in the former Soviet Union and is the leader in the soft-drink industry in Russia. Pepsi outsells Coca-Cola by 6 to 1 and is seen as a local brand. Also, Pepsi must counter trade its concentrate with Russia's Stolichnaya vodka since rubles are not tradable on the world market. However, Pepsi has also had some problems. There has not been an increase in brand loyalty for Pepsi since its advertising blitz in Russia, even though it has produced commercials tailored to the Russian market and has sponsored television concerts. On the positive side, Pepsi may be leading Coca-Cola due to the big difference in price between the two colas. While Pepsi sells for Rb250 (25 cents), Coca-Cola sells for Rb450. For the economy size, Pepsi sells 2 liters for Rb1,300, but Coca-Cola sells 1.5 liters for Rb1,800. Coca-Cola, on the other hand, only moved into Russia 2 years ago and is manufactured locally in Moscow and St. Petersburg under a license. Despite investing $85 million in these two bottling plants, they do not perceive Coca-Cola as a premium brand in the...

...Marketing Strategy Analysis of Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola
Two famous beverage companies exist in the market today, Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola. Each competes intensely to distribute their beverage and food products to a global market for higher profits for the last several generations. In the free market, it can be difficult to determine which company uses the best practices in their marketing strategy as both use similar strategies to expand their local and global markets. In this paper the subjects to describe are the products, prices variations, target demographics, promotion mix, sales, relationship building strategies, unfair predatory marketing, technology, and marketing campaign successes and failures for Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola.
Product
Both Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola offer a variety of drinks and brands. Pepsi offers brands such as Starbucks, Sobe, Ocean Spray, Aquafina, and Lipton, to name a few. Coca-Cola has a list from A to Z on their website including well-known brands such as A & W, Dasani, Dannon, Minute Maid, Nestea, and PowerAde. Each company primarily sells the basic products listed below.
Coca-Cola
• Energy drinks
• Juice and juice drinks
• Soft drinks
• Sports drinks
• Tea
• Coffee
• Water
(Coca-Cola Company, 2011).
Pepsi
• Waters
• Soft drinks
• Energy drinks
• Ready to drink teas
• Juice and...

...Coke Versus Pepsi : Differences in Cultural History Rather than Taste
Posted by Nicole Smith, Jan 16, 2012 Food And Drink No Comments Print
For many years, Coca Cola and Pepsi have enjoyed the position as the two most enjoyed soft drinks in the USA, as they have maintained their popularity over the past several decades. One can divide soft drink fans into two major camps: Coke-lovers and Pepsi-lovers. Each of the camps substantiates its favoritism not only on flavor, but also on ideas, facts, and preferences that justify its choice and allow it to stay true to its selection. The following analysis of the history of Pepsi and Coca Cola explores Pepsi and Coke with an emphasis on advertising and cultural significance of these efforts, discovering what makes these soft drinks so popular and what differentiates them from each other. What emerges is that there is little in the way of differences between Coke and Pepsi outside of different cultural histories.
There are many similarities between Coca Cola and Pepsi and the history of Coca Cola is nothing like the history of Pepsi outside of the fact that both companies were advertising soda. Both were intended to serve as recreational drinks associated with parties, fun, sex, and entertainment. The two drinks have just about the same color, the same amount of...