You might want take a look at this method, is not conventional. Is mostly positional digits play based on 'assumed' movement in sample space 0-9:

draw set range pairs/ triads combo (digits are positional)

0 thru 3 8679

4 thru 6 1327

7 thru 9 5124

So in a draw set 125, you inclined to choose 8679 as BASE since the draw 125 is within range 0 thru 3, you best pair is 86-87 -89 (positional) over 67-69. the priority of positions reduces your picks and level of str8 bets increases. Just take a glance of your state results, no harm in backtesting. X is draw range.

NY DATA

Pick 3

Pick 4

Midday

Evening

Midday

Evening

Mon, Jul 8, 2013

9-5-4

7-9-3-4

Sun, Jul 7, 2013

1-0-0

6-8-1

2-5-3-7

6-9-7-4

Sat, Jul 6, 2013

7-8-7

7-5-4

0-5-5-6

3-5-4-7

Fri, Jul 5, 2013

6-4-6

2-4-4

2-4-6-2

0-2-1-5

Thu, Jul 4, 2013

7-3-5

6-4-2

6-7-9-6

8-0-9-4

Wed, Jul 3, 2013

7-7-3

8-3-5

8-6-7-1

0-7-6-6

Tue, Jul 2, 2013

0-4-8

0-4-6

1-3-0-3

4-3-8-9

Mon, Jul 1, 2013

7-2-8

0-7-1

6-0-6-2

4-2-7-9

Sun, Jun 30, 2013

9-6-2

1-8-1

6-7-7-7

5-0-7-5

Sat, Jun 29, 2013

7-6-4

1-6-5

3-7-0-7

9-7-2-5

Increasing the 'degree of pair/triad certainty' using Draw set range> Base keys :0-3>8679>4-6>1327 and 7-9>5124. Base keys are positional, lets start with date 6/29 with draw set 764, which falls in set range 7-9 and 4-6 , now form a simple box following the sequence of draw set 764(positional):

7 6 4(draw set)

5 1 1

1 3 3 > this is 3*3*3*3 picks, but that's not our scope, our intent is reduce this box observing the trend

2 2 2 of digits in position 1, so reduce the box by sequent draw(Day of 6/30) 962

Increasing the 'degree of pair/triad certainty' using Draw set range> Base keys :0-3>8679>4-6>1327 and 7-9>5124. Base keys are positional, lets start with date 6/29 with draw set 764, which falls in set range 7-9 and 4-6 , now form a simple box following the sequence of draw set 764(positional):

7 6 4(draw set)

5 1 1

1 3 3 > this is 3*3*3*3 picks, but that's not our scope, our intent is reduce this box observing the trend

2 2 2 of digits in position 1, so reduce the box by sequent draw(Day of 6/30) 962

next draw of 7/1(day draw) 728, with base key info the digits 5,then 1(pos 1 is your best pair) or reduced

it further with next of 7/2 048 (day) , now your reduced box is 511 and 133, the pair 51,53 has edge over

11-13. Your final picks should be waged for day and night. X, the draw set was from range 7-9 and 4-6,so

x is mostly 7,8,9 or 4,5,6 for 12 picks or less (stats for singles higher than doubles reduces picks further).

Is best to test 2 set draws (764,964) following the steps illustrated.

Thank you, this illustration is great because I was giving myself a headache ... but my question to you is why are we ignoring the eve draw for stats yet the forward play is for both mid & eve? Also why is there no digit 0 in the base keys? And I realize that hot & cold digits don't factor in your workout because the digits are just members of a set but if you'll notice from the data above "7" repeated quite a bit in the first position in the midday draws and that's probably because it was missing in action from that position for most of June (the last time it played before 6/29 was 6/8). I bring this up because using those base sets the best I would have done is a box hit because I wouldn't have necessarily factored the 7 in the first position ...

Increasing the 'degree of pair/triad certainty' using Draw set range> Base keys :0-3>8679>4-6>1327 and 7-9>5124. Base keys are positional, lets start with date 6/29 with draw set 764, which falls in set range 7-9 and 4-6 , now form a simple box following the sequence of draw set 764(positional):

7 6 4(draw set)

5 1 1

1 3 3 > this is 3*3*3*3 picks, but that's not our scope, our intent is reduce this box observing the trend

2 2 2 of digits in position 1, so reduce the box by sequent draw(Day of 6/30) 962

next draw of 7/1(day draw) 728, with base key info the digits 5,then 1(pos 1 is your best pair) or reduced

it further with next of 7/2 048 (day) , now your reduced box is 511 and 133, the pair 51,53 has edge over

11-13. Your final picks should be waged for day and night. X, the draw set was from range 7-9 and 4-6,so

x is mostly 7,8,9 or 4,5,6 for 12 picks or less (stats for singles higher than doubles reduces picks further).

Is best to test 2 set draws (764,964) following the steps illustrated.

I want you to observe or just glance positions of digits when a set is drawn(day or night ), lets take 165 of 6/29, look at digit 1 > key 8679, 8,6,7 fell in position 1 from 7/3 to 7/7. Take draw 071, digit 0>key 8679, 8,6,7 , pos 1 confirmed. Take digit 7 of draw 071(7/1), with key 5142, 5,4 is confirmed at pos 2 (7/2 to 7/6), pretty much for digit 6 of draw 165 with key 1327.

This is my approach, is not conventional, is not based on historical data, but 'assumed' behavior of digits in Space Sample (0-9). The methods is self-induced, you don't need to count skips/frequence etc, but rather recurring behavior of the digits. Your filter is reduction by sequent draw set/s. The Scope is to get 2 or 3 digits which gives a high degree of certainty as a base. I suggest you keep workout for day and eve separate till targeted 2 or 3 digits and wage selections combined or separate, you avoid distraction and cost (optional). Lets form a box for draw 165

8 1 1 now observe pos 1 and 2 from dates 6/30 to 7/7 to get reccurring pos of digits of the keys, since our

I want you to observe or just glance positions of digits when a set is drawn(day or night ), lets take 165 of 6/29, look at digit 1 > key 8679, 8,6,7 fell in position 1 from 7/3 to 7/7. Take draw 071, digit 0>key 8679, 8,6,7 , pos 1 confirmed. Take digit 7 of draw 071(7/1), with key 5142, 5,4 is confirmed at pos 2 (7/2 to 7/6), pretty much for digit 6 of draw 165 with key 1327.

This is my approach, is not conventional, is not based on historical data, but 'assumed' behavior of digits in Space Sample (0-9). The methods is self-induced, you don't need to count skips/frequence etc, but rather recurring behavior of the digits. Your filter is reduction by sequent draw set/s. The Scope is to get 2 or 3 digits which gives a high degree of certainty as a base. I suggest you keep workout for day and eve separate till targeted 2 or 3 digits and wage selections combined or separate, you avoid distraction and cost (optional). Lets form a box for draw 165

8 1 1 now observe pos 1 and 2 from dates 6/30 to 7/7 to get reccurring pos of digits of the keys, since our

x22 now first pos are 6 and 9 (be mindful of priority of digits in key, eg 8679 in this case).

9xx the pair 63-62 is more certain than 92-93, so you work your selections around 62-63

Okay Adobea78, this illustration makes it even easier to see and get what you're talking about... Now why is the 62-63 pair more certain than the 92-93 pair ... is it because sequentially 6 comes before 9 (I know you've mentioned the sequence thing before) or is it because a 9 just appeared in the first position yesterday's midday draw?

Okay Adobea78, this illustration makes it even easier to see and get what you're talking about... Now why is the 62-63 pair more certain than the 92-93 pair ... is it because sequentially 6 comes before 9 (I know you've mentioned the sequence thing before) or is it because a 9 just appeared in the first position yesterday's midday draw?

Yes, priority of each member(digit) of a key is sequential, the formation of BOX is sequential, final selection from reduced box is sequential (Left>Right/ Top/ Bottom), this info reduces your picks. See ,with the draw set 165 workout, I did not invert the key for digit 1>8679 to 9768 or 6789 , but rather maintained their positional sequence, why? because 8 >6>7 recurs most often when digit 1 is drawn.

Yes, priority of each member(digit) of a key is sequential, the formation of BOX is sequential, final selection from reduced box is sequential (Left>Right/ Top/ Bottom), this info reduces your picks. See ,with the draw set 165 workout, I did not invert the key for digit 1>8679 to 9768 or 6789 , but rather maintained their positional sequence, why? because 8 >6>7 recurs most often when digit 1 is drawn.

I tried this method for 1 month.It did not work for me.Maybe it will work for you............

A good method is to play several 50 cent box bets to offest taxes you will pay at the end of the year on a 1099. Also, save ALL scatch off tickets and losing mega, numbers, lotto etc, tickets, they can be written off towards what you won with the 1099.

You just can't write off more than you lost. If you get a 1099 for $10,000 but have $4543 in losing receipts, you only pay taxes on the balance ($5457).

Hitting a pick 4 with the same numbers eg: 1000 2004 3333 is great.

I've hit the pick 4 3 times, nothing huge, I sit out a lot, then WHAM!!

GOD is great, beer is good and people are crazy!

"I don't look for the numbers, the numbers look for and sometimes find me..."

Yes, priority of each member(digit) of a key is sequential, the formation of BOX is sequential, final selection from reduced box is sequential (Left>Right/ Top/ Bottom), this info reduces your picks. See ,with the draw set 165 workout, I did not invert the key for digit 1>8679 to 9768 or 6789 , but rather maintained their positional sequence, why? because 8 >6>7 recurs most often when digit 1 is drawn.

I will give this a closer look going forward draw by draw. Backtesting something like this doesn't really do any good (in my opinion) because one might stretch or skew the results in a way that isn't possible to do before a draw. This way when I pick the possible pairs/triads if they don't show, then they just don't as opposed to some other combination showing that doesn't give the straight but in backtesting mode I'd like to think that I WOULD have picked it and PLAYED it/MIRRORED it or some other variation that chances are wouldn't have happened!

Unfortunately can't play online in Pennsylvania. But I have had two really big hits. 25,000 and 20,000 on big 4 here in pa. Both on quads. 4444 in 2010 and 1111 this year. Im looking for 100k on 1234 midday. Its never hit str8.

Yes that's exactly it....i got something but unfortunately i decided to keep it for myself cause i have asked a couple of members here for help on their systems and they refused !...also i worked hard on this not sleeping at all !!!! so i said you know what ....i can come up with things like that too...and in fact i did ! God is soooooo good !i'm lovin' it !!! lol !!! The power of belief !!!

Hey there Whatzup. I'd really love to learn your new pick 4 system, so, would you consider a trade? I'll PM you my system and vice versa...interested?