The Commission today adopted major regulatory proposals to complete the telecoms single market and deliver a Connected Continent. The overarching aim is to build a connected, competitive continent and enabling sustainable digital jobs and industries; making life better by ensuring consumers can enjoy the digital devices and services they love; and making it easier for European businesses & entrepreneurs to create the jobs of the future

A Connected continent is about: Faster connections. Easier business. Simpler life. Ready for the future Yes to single market; yes to net neutrality; no to roaming premiums; no to red tape

1. Overview

Why is this important for growth?

Europe desperately needs to tap into new sources of growth and innovation. . Since each economic sector today increasingly depends on good connectivity to be competitive, the solution lies in harnessing digital technology and ICT (source of half our productivity growth), to the single market (our crown jewel). We can’t afford to remain trapped in 28 national markets; if this continues, we will fail to feed the digital economy the raw materials it needs: connectivity and scale.

When enabled, the digital ecosystem grows fast (faster than China’s economy) and creates jobs (794,000 in app economy in just five years, while economy was in recession); it stimulates innovation and business activity across the economy, through heightened productivity, efficiency and revenue. The missing cornerstone in this digital ecosystem is a Telecoms Single Market, which would permanently increase GDP (basis: 2010) by nearly 1% every year if delivered.

What about jobs and consumer?

Europeans are struggling with the effects of economic crisis. It is essential to take every enabling action possible to create jobs – and no sector offers better opportunities for employment growth (especially for young people) than the digital sector. It is also essential that citizens have full access to the internet, which they value highly, and that they are protected from unfair charges and practices such as roaming rip-offs and opaque contracts.

What about the EU's industrial and global leadership?

The world envied Europe as we pioneered the global mobile industry in the early 1990s (GSM), but our industry often has no home market to sell to (for example, 4G) consumers miss out on latest improvements or their devices lack the networks needed to be enjoyed fully. These problems hurt all sectors and rob Europe of jobs it badly needs EU companies are not global internet players. Lagos has 4G mobile, but Brussels does not.

Europe still retains global ICT industries in areas like electronics, robotics, and telecommunications equipment. It has innovated in healthcare applications, smart city technologies, electronic public services and open data. But a fragmented market is not fit for global competition. Only a telecoms single market will allow the whole digital ecosystem to be more dynamic and recapture a leading global role.

What has the Commission proposed?

The Commission has proposed legislative changes to complementing the current regulatory framework that would make a reality of two key EU Treaty Principles: the freedom to provide and to consumer (digital) services wherever one is in the EU.

The proposal does this by pushing the telecoms sector fully into the internet age (incentives for new business models and more investment) and removing bottlenecks and barriers so Europe’s 28 national telecoms markets become a single market (building on 2009 Telecoms Framework Directive, and more than 26 years of work to create that single market) The proposal is a package, not a pick -and choose menu, to ensure all stakeholder groups are net beneficiaries.

What is in the proposal?

Simplification and reduction of regulation for companies

More coordination of spectrum allocation – so that we see more wireless broadband, more 4G, and the emergence of pan-EU mobile companies with integrated networks

Standardised wholesale products: encourages more competition between more companies

Protection of Open internet: guarantees for net neutrality, innovation and consumer rights.

Pushing roaming premiums out of the market: a carrot and stick approach to say goodbye to roaming premiums by 2016 or earlier.

No change to definition of electronic communications services provider

No pan-European spectrum license

No ban on differentiated internet products

Why does this matter?

Telecoms networks are the foundation of the wider digital economy. Every sector now depends on connectivity. This means today’s telecoms sector is holding back the rest of the economy.

Networks are too slow, unreliable and insecure for most Europeans; Telecoms companies often have huge debts, making it hard to invest in improvements. We need to turn the sector around so that it enables more productivity, jobs and growth.

As a starting point, the sector needs a single market (an annual 0.9% boost to GDP).This is the biggest single EU-wide macro-economic boost available in the next few years.

More than 4 out of 10 companies are dissatisfied with the connectivity they are getting. They find services poor and speeds too low. This is a drag on their competitiveness. Consumers are also sick of unfair charges, confusing information, and non-functioning devices. Delivering this package is a matter of political credibility for EU.

Waiting will hurt everyone, with no guarantee that “big bang” approach could be politically negotiated. We have to act now to ensure other economies do not race ahead, in ability to access online content and applications of their choice, and prevent our telecoms companies from creating wider damage through further decline or even bankruptcy.

How have we got here?

The 2013 Spring European Council conclusions called for the Commission to present "concrete measures to achieve the single market in ICT as early as possible" in time for the October European Council. Three years of consultations, public events and private meetings inform these proposals - including two major public events with 1000 participants in June.

One-stop shop: operators operating in more than one Member State will benefit from a single EU authorisation requiring onlyone notification, thereby establishing one reference regulator (NRA) for authorisation issues (including withdrawal/suspension of the authorisation)

Inconsistent obligations for operators operating in more than one MS

One-stop shop for authorisation will provide consistency for companies

Commission will have the power to require national regulators to withdraw draft regulatory proposals which are incompatible with EU law (thus prevent regulatory inconsistency)

Decisions of national regulators must promote investment and consider all competitive constraints (including from OTTs) – which will be crucial for establishing a level playing field with OTTs

The criteria that the Commission and national regulators apply for selecting markets that should or should not be regulated are strengthened by the inclusion of the well-established “3 criteria” test in EU law. This prevents over-regulation of competitive markets.

Full harmonisation of consumer protection rules will remove the need for customising services for every territory, and give consumers extra certainty

Inconsistent fixed wholesale access for service providers operating in more than one MS

Uncoordinated spectrum access conditions for mobile operators make it more difficult to plan long-term investments, operate cross-border and eventually gain scale. Today vital wireless broadband spectrum is released at different moments in the EU, subject to different timing considerations and under different conditions

Common regulatory principles for spectrum authorisation procedures for wireless broadband to support economies of scale

Common best practice criteria for defining the availability and conditions of spectrum for wireless broadband

Harmonisation of timing and duration of spectrum assignments for wireless broadband

Commission's power to organise peer review among Member States and to review national assignment procedures

Congested networks because soaring data demand is outstripping the capacity of existing networks. The need to increase data capacity

Promote infrastructure and spectrum sharing and spectrum trading

Promote incentives and appropriate compensations for timely freeing up of spectrum for wireless broadband

Ensure the least onerous authorisation conditions and revoking of licences if spectrum is not used

Promote the use and the deployment of WI-FI and small / micro cells to increase capacity, by simplifying deployment of small area access points and sharing of wifi capacity.

No EU-wide consumer rules (hurts and confuses both consumer and operator)

Full harmonisation of consumer protection (not only minimums or options as in current Universal Service Directive)

End misleading advertising of Internet speeds (you will get what you pay for).

Users blocked from using full internet, and face different rules in each member state

Guarantee net neutrality across Europe: an end to blocking or throttling of competing or data-heavy services. Freedom to offer higher speeds or guaranteed quality according to user needs (similar to express mail or recommended delivery for postal services) provided open internet is not impaired.

Roaming is an anomaly in a Single Market

Strong incentives for operators to provide roaming at domestic price levels by no later than 2016 throughout the EU. Charges for incoming roaming calls will end in July 2014.

3. EU telecoms sector is in difficulty

There has been massive growth in demand (especially data), however, since last reform of EU telecoms rules, (IP/11/622) this growth has not been monetized. Revenue is declining in real terms (-2.2% in 2011 and -1.1% in 2012) and relative to US & Asian & other markets. Market capitalization is down 22% since 2011. Moreover, Europe’s former telecoms monopolies have a net investment rate of virtually zero, lagging behind competitors (source: HSBC). Wireless investment is half the rate of US/Canada since 2002.

Several operators struggle with high debt, as much as three times as high as company stock-market value (Telecom Italia) and upwards of €30bn (Telefonica) Telecoms underperformance is holding back the rest of the economy. In particular, it harms sectors such as equipment manufacturers, internet entrepreneurs, cars, smart objects, wholesale, retail and logistics, health care and creative industries.

What caused this?

The telecoms sector has been slow to reform (e.g. responding to Skype, data revolution, ditching cash cows like roaming)

Cultural and regulatory differences mean Europe is not seen as place to start or / grow a global internet business (compared to Silicon Valley

Fragmentation of European market and regulation along national lines prevents efficiencies and scale

The short term interest of national government maximising revenue from spectrum auctions sapped large sums from many telecoms companies, eating away at investments in network built-out.

Companies cannot procure crucial "raw materials" such as internet connectivity or access to harmonised frequencies under coherent and competitive conditions from a single provider in several Member States (because we lack single market for these "materials").

DIVERGENCE IN EUROPE’S MARKETS

Operating license fees range from €0 to €3000

Some countries even specify which font needs to be used in consumer contracts

Administration fees for holding a license range from €5,000 to €15,000 Between EU countries there is 774% revenue differential per call minute.

The price of spectrum rights varies by up to a factor of 50 (2600Ghz band)

There is a different approach to regulation of wholesale broadband markets in virtually every member state

International mobile calls vary from €0.35 to €1.19 per minute across the EU.

In five years this will mean that ….

WHO

WHAT

TELECOMS OPERATORS

Operators are not stuck in small national markets: can easily plan/work across multiple countries, bid for spectrum or access networks in multiple countries according to predictable timeframe and conditions.

They offer services across borders, focused on modern needs, which consumers value and are prepared to pay for.

With fewer barriers and more economies of scale, they are more efficient, and can compete against global players.

EQUIPMENT MAKERS

World leading equipment suppliers once again focussing their R&D investments in Europe, where they have access to one of the richest and most digitalised customer base, back from today's focus on Asia / US

Services optimised for the European market instead of cutting out at border

Huge opportunities to build all kinds of devices from connected cars to fridges

START-UP

Part of a bigger start-up ecosystem; can plan to go global from day 1.

Supported by fact / have no fear that network owners will block or throttle their new service, means greater innovation and opportunity

Opportunity to develop services that depend on enhanced quality connections

CITIZENS / ORDINARY INTERNET USERS

Every European enjoys availability of 30Mbps or more broadband, fixed+mobile.

More choice of phone and internet providers, including from other countries

No unfair roaming premiums; full access to the full open internet

BUSINESSES IN A DIGITAL ECONOMY

Can have a single phone + internet contract even if spread over several countries.

Easier to stay connected with branches, suppliers, customers.

New services like cloud computing, videoconferencing, 3D printing will work, including to guaranteed quality of service if that is needed.

OVERALL ECONOMY

More productive, leading to additional growth and jobs.

As more sectors go online they become greener and smarter

4. Delivering sustainable jobs

A Connected Continent will provide a foundation for sustainable jobs with good pay

PROBLEMS Unemployment levels are unacceptably high. Europe is in a digital transition. There are millions of new digital job opportunities – literally a million vacancies in 2015 predicted because of skills gap - and also a series of necessary reforms that are not yet complete.

Today companies relying on the digital economy find it difficult to expand and invest, they find it difficult to employ more people. Because of underinvestment in networks, associated industries (from apps to telecoms equipment makers) don’t achieve full potential and do not create the demand for better networks. We need to break this vicious circle.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

Make the digital sector, which has a very young workforce, a jobs priority as a way to address youth unemployment in Europe.

Help start-ups grow by giving them the world’s biggest market to sell to from Day 1. (for example, after a policy battle, French tech-start-ups achieved 24% employment growth in 2012).

Support labour force changes in telecoms companies which have not adapted to new digital, data-driven business models

Work with companies in a Grand Coalition for Digital Skills and Jobs, to train individuals and to improve the overall digital ecosystem.

IMPACTS AND EXAMPLES

794,000 jobs created by app economy, including nearly 600,000 in the app economy directly in last five years. This is what happens when a borderless environment exists.

Those industries need good networks. According to Analysis Mason and Tech4i2 (2013) even "modest" intervention to build fast broadband infrastructure, 447,000 new jobs are expected to be created in the first 3 years and two million new jobs by 2020.

For telecoms: A real telecoms single market will support growth and counter the trend of 10% drop in direct telecoms labour force expected in next few years.

For other businesses: Cloud computing can only work at EU-scale or greater, and demand for it will drive further investments in better networks.The cloud is the “killer app” for superfast broadband. Standardised inputs, bigger markets, reduced market distortions (like blocked services), and greater digital skills combine to it easier for businesses like cloud providers to generate new jobs.

Vice President Neelie Kroes said "We add to unemployment, especially youth unemployment, every day we don’t deliver a telecoms single market "

5. Less red tape for companies

#1 Single authorisation

PROBLEM: There is no pan-EU mobile or fixed telecoms company In theory it is possible to operate in all Member States and yet no-one does, because the system does not work You must comply with different registration requirements in each Member State where services are provided. Operators face extra costs and lose time dealing with different and inconsistent nationally enforced rules, with varying market outcomes.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

Learn and copy from other sectors in EU single market,(such as banking) by offering operators the chance to operate in all countries through a single EU authorisation, and the chance to deal with that one authority on other licensing issues.

Pan-EU legal certainty & the right to equal regulatory treatment

IMPACTS

More companies operating with ease across borders.

For business: Lower entry barriers for new companies, lower costs for service. provision and new opportunities to expand into additional EU member states.

For consumers: Benefit from new offers from new competitors in their MS.

For the future: real basis for a wider digital single market in Europe.

Vice President Neelie Kroes said “The right to operate everywhere is not real unless you can enforce it. The best way to do that is a single authorisation, because it is a guarantee. This is for tomorrow’s companies as well as existing companies.”

#2 New Criteria for Regulating Markets

PROBLEMS: National regulators are over-regulating or under-regulating specific telecoms (sub) markets, which they define differently.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

Strengthening, by inclusion in the Regulation, of the well-established "3 criteria" test that the Commission applies to select markets that should be regulated in its “Recommendation on Relevant Markets”, and that national regulators must apply if they wish to regulate markets that are not in that Recommendation . This will now be legally enforceable.

In order to regulate three criteria would need to be met:

Presence of high and non-transitory structural, legal or regulatory barriers to entry;

Market structure does not tend towards effective competition within the relevant time horizon, having regard to the state of infrastructure-based and other competition behind the barriers to entry;

PROBLEMS: The business-to-business market (around half of whole EU telecoms market) suffers from a lack of consistent design of products and connectivity, meaning that potential demand is not tapped.

New entrants to consumer broadband markets are hampered by the wide variation in regulated network access products, making common business models and technical choices impossible for multiple Member States.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

In cases where dominant operators with significant market power are obliged to offer competitors virtual access to their networks, both buyer and seller should face harmonised conditions and features across EU.

Common criteria for assured service quality connectivity negotiated between operators on commercial terms.

IMPACTS

For telecoms businesses: Easier to expand into additional European markets.

For other businesses: key for non-telco companies such as eHealth providers, cloud computing service providers, videoconference companies – it means they can be sure to meet contract and service level commitments.

Vice President Neelie Kroes said “European standardised virtual access products, with assured Quality of Service, will help expand the business-to-business market. The new obligations will replace rather than add to national obligations”

For the future: your mobile will be free of dropped calls and pages that don’t load. Efficient use and coordinated access to spectrum will lead to more network investment. Short-termist high fees policies that are not consistent with good spectrum management will be constrained, favouring capital investment in networks.

Vice President Neelie Kroes said “We need a new approach to spectrum so that Europeans can enjoy the latest mobile developments. This is a sensitive issue for national governments, so we are treading carefully but purposefully. It’s just a fact that demand for data is soaring and the current spectrum system cannot cope. Networks face congestion or breakdown under the status quo – disrupting citizens and business – and mobile companies have no chance to build a pan-EU company.”

Connected Continent means spectrum for wireless broadband

PROBLEMS

Europe is not a developing continent, but you would never know it from our level of 4G coverage. 4G/LTE reaches only 26% of the European population. In the US one company alone (Verizon) reaches 90%!

Increase capacity through right to share access to WI-FI access points.

Operational improvements such as the common use of active and passive infrastructures, spectrum sharing and spectrum trading will make it easier and cheaper to deploy and/or renovate wireless networks with new technologies.

Common regulatory principles for spectrum authorisations, common criteria for the availability and conditions of spectrum.

IMPACTS

Mobile network operators will be able to use small area access point technologies (4G or Wi-Fi) to increase the capacity of the networks.

Fixed line network operators will be able provide complementary wireless broadband connectivity services through public access to Wi-Fi networks, that may - depending on consent - be located in the consumer's or business' premises.

End-users will have more choice for wireless broadband connectivity easier possibility to offer Wi-Fi based access to the internet to others.

Vice President Neelie Kroes said “Operators need to expand the capacity of their wireless broadband networks in cost-efficient ways. Consumers and businesses want to wirelessly use their fixed lines: Wi-Fi or 4G small cells will do the trick. We are not forcing end-users to share their Wi-Fi, but giving them choice .”

8. Stable copper network access prices

A Connected Continent means .stabilising copper network access prices

PROBLEMS

Copper network owners need stability of income from renting out their networks to competitors, to enable investment in faster “next generation” networks.

Alternative operators do not have a sufficiently consistent basis for planning pan-EU business operation, based on stable and consistent access prices.

National regulators apply up to six different ways of calculating wholesale copper access prices (for example by choosing to apply different asset lifetimes and the depreciation methods).

This means the price of copper access ranges from 4 to 14 euros per month for the copper LLU (local loop unbundling) monthly wholesale rental.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

Long-term price stability and more aligned prices across the single market.

No imposition of price regulation on access to high-speed next generation networks where demonstrable constraints against anti-competitive behaviour exist in the retail markets, and strengthened non-discrimination obligations to ensure that competition is strong.

IMPACTS

For telecoms businesses: today’s network owners will have greater certainty over their income allowing them to plan further network upgrades. Today’s alternative operators will share the risk of network upgrades where price regulation is not imposed. No artificial subsidy to copper network access to undercut next generation network deployment.

For consumers: fair pricing and improved quality and range of services as a result of improved wholesale conditions at the wholesale level.

For the future: Europe will enjoy better networks

Vice President Neelie Kroes said “We aim to stabilise prices over a six year period to give the industry certainty. This allows further network investment and more rational business decisions. In order to stabilise prices over the medium-term it is obvious that there must be some initial price adjustments order to improve convergence of costing approaches.”

9. An end to Roaming and intra-EU call premiums

A Connected Continent means an end to premiums for roaming and intra EU calls

PROBLEMS

High premiums for roaming and intra-EU calls are an excessive irritant to business and leisure customers; they are a market distortion with no rational place in a single market – they teach users to fear their phones instead of using them.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

Create a true European communications space by fading out and eliminating the difference in charges paid for domestic, roaming and intra-EU calls.

ROAMING:

Operators will lose the right to charge for incoming calls while a user is travelling abroad in EU, and additionally face a choice between a carrot and a stick.

The carrot is that they can be largely free of European regulation, if they extend their domestic plans/bundles so that by July 2016, customers throughout the Union are able to use their phones and smartphones while travelling throughout the Union at domestic rates. There will be a glidepath from July 2014, allowing operators to adapt either the number of plans they offer or the number of countries they cover at domestic rates.

The stick is being subject the 2012 roaming regulation which forces companies to offer their customers the possibility to roam with new competitors (alternative roaming providers). A customer will have the right to leave their domestic operator when travelling and take cheaper roaming services from a local company or a rival company in the home country, without changing their SIM card.

EUROPEAN FIXED CALLS:

Operators will have to charge no more than a domestic long-distance call for all fixed line calls to other EU member states. Any extra costs have to be objectively justified.

EUROPEAN MOBILE COMMUNICATION:

Operators will have to charge no more than the euro-tariffs for regulated voice and SMS roaming communications for mobile communications to other EU member states. Any extra costs have to be objectively justified.

IMPACTS

Consumers:No fear, more convenience, reasonable prices. This benefits those that travel and those who never leave home; those who love their mobiles and those who only have landlines. Consumers and businesses alike.

For telecoms businesses: A direct impact of around 0,5% revenue decrease due to elimination of price differentiation between national and intra-EU calls, compensated by higher consumption volume in the medium term. The proposed roaming regime is optional and is expected to be beneficial to operators in the medium term.

For other businesses: further savings in addition to the €1100 a year already saved by a moderate business traveller in the course of year (compared to 2009 prices), The abolition of roaming charges will promote the cross-border use of connected devices and services (e.g. M2M solutions), and boost the evolution of mobile data applications, thereby contributing to a more favourable business environment

For the future: proof that real reform is possible in telecoms, and that the EU can make direct tangible improvements to citizens lives.

Vice President Neelie Kroes said: "Our proposal on roaming builds on the existing rules by offering operators the incentive to gradually introduce retail offers in which domestic service rate applies both to domestic services and roaming services. (Roam-like-at-Home). It also puts an end to unjustified price distinctions between the price of national and "international" (intra-EU) calls."

EU consumers should not pay more for calling abroad or when they travel abroad.

The current roaming rules are designed to reduce the problems of national markets but they don’t build a real single market. The current rules were written before the economic urgency of establishing the telecoms single market was apparent.

The current rules provide a safety net and a stick to complement the new opportunities and ‘carrot’ contained in this package.

Domestic mobile prices have consistently fallen alongside the previous three reductions in mobile roaming price caps. There is no evidence to suggest that eliminating roaming premiums will push these prices up."

10. Consolidation in the telecoms sector

A Connected Continent means consolidation in telecoms sector

PROBLEMS

There are hundreds of telecom operators in Europe, but none active in all Member States.

Several major companies (e.g. Vodafone, France Telecom) have begun to withdraw from certain Member States’ markets. Where they expand it is often outside the European Union.

An average European can only choose among 3 or 4 alternative providers.

Telecom operators need bigger scale to become more competitive global players and increase their ability to invest and expand at a time when consumers increasingly value faster networks and EU-wide convenience.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

There is no reason to change competition rules. Those rules pose few problems for cross-border mergers.

In addition, by creating the conditions for a real single market (such as a single space for calls and data, and harmonised consumer rights, and the possibility to make pan-EU investments), we create the conditions for a different way to look at markets from a competition perspective.

IMPACTS

For telecoms businesses: greater opportunities to consolidate and become pan-European businesses with the necessary scale to compete globally

For other businesses: greater access to pan-European services offered by pan-European operators

For consumers: benefit from a larger choice of alternative operators, better networks and other services than pan-European businesses can provide

For the future: a market structure and market offers that compare favourably with our global competitors

Vice President Neelie Kroes said: “Creating a single market is our policy objective. Consolidation, on its own, cannot be a policy objective. Why? First, mergers are never an end in themselves. Second, we cannot put the cart before the horse.

“Creating a Single Telecoms Market would allow operators to expand more easily to other European markets and change way in which consolidation is looked at under applicable EU competition control rules. But creating a single market is the pre-condition for changes in the competition law analysis.”

11. Yes to Net Neutrality!

A Connected Continent means an open internet

PROBLEMS

There are no clear rules on net neutrality today at EU level, leaving 96% of Europeans without legal protection for their right to access the full open internet.

National regulators do not have the power to intervene against blocking and throttling under current EU rules.

Some EU Member States (NL, SI) have adopted laws, other countries are reflecting on measures, but without EU action this could further fragment the European market, and significantly complicate the integrated management of multi-territorial networks.

The blocking and throttling of P2P and VoIP is the most common example of unacceptable traffic management by operators: around 21% of fixed Internet access subscribers and around 36% of mobile subscriptions are affected by restrictions.

This causes problems for: consumers who can’t enjoy full internet; content and application providers who do not have a guaranteed access to consumers, and are prevented from innovating in the long term; operators who face different approaches regarding traffic management practices in different Member States and who are not encouraged to create new business models, but simply protect past/current territory and traditional revenue sources like voice calls.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

This proposal will end discriminatory blocking and throttling and deliver effective protection of the open internet. It sets out clear rules for traffic management on the Internet, which has to be non-discriminatory, proportionate and transparent.

Companies would however be allowed to differentiate their offers (for example by speed) and compete on enhanced quality of service. There is nothing unusual about this – postal services (express mail) and airlines (economy/business class) have done this for decades. But this is subject to a vital pre-condition: that the quality of open Internet must not be impaired.

To meet end-users' demand for better service quality, content providers may agree deals with internet providers to assure a certain quality of service ("specialised services"). Such offers will enable telecom operators to generate additional revenue streams from OTT actors, content providers as well as from consumers, who are willing to pay for better or faster services. These revenues, in turn, will enable operators to finance investments into network upgrades and expansion.

Specialised services must not lead to quality degradation of the "normal" Internet. National regulators will monitor quality of service and may impose minimum quality requirements, under Commission coordination.

IMPACTS

For business: Stepping stone for innovators, who will not see their applications and services blocked and who will be able to choose to pay for a guaranteed quality of service (ex: videoconference businesses, cloud computing, e-health).

European operators can develop new business models on a pan-European scale.

For consumers: Will be given new rights that they do not have today. Will be able to access all contents and applications of their choice on any device they choose (within the limits of any contracted data volumes or speeds and subject to existing laws) They will also benefit from a greater range of high-quality services on offer. They will have access to an open internet, vital for freedom of expression and debates, as well as the entry point for innovative online start-ups.

For the future: A real basis for providing and enjoying services everywhere in the EU. It will allow innovative companies to launch services without fear of blocking or throttling and design new services requiring a guaranteed quality of service. Operators will have access to additional revenue streams to finance investments into network upgrades and expansion.

Vice President Neelie Kroes said: "We do not have protection of net neutrality in Europe today. This proposal will ensure it. The proposal will optimise the outcome for end-users, content providers and Internet service providers.

12. New consumer rights

A Connected Continent means new rights for consumers: #1 Quality of Service

PROBLEMS

Today operators are often not sufficiently transparent on their traffic management practices as well as on the quality of service actually provided.

94% of consumers think that ISPs do not provide clear information on their website on blocking/throttling of specific applications or services.

There are major discrepancies between advertised speeds and actual speeds on fixed networks. On average, EU consumers receive only 74% of the advertised headline speed they have paid for.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

Operators required to supply (both public and contractual) information on the average speeds they actually provide to their customers during normal and peak times, data volume limitations, and on traffic management practices.

National regulators required to monitor quality of service and may impose minimum quality requirements, under Commission control.

Consumers can terminate their contract or claim damages if there is a significant and non-temporary discrepancy between what they were promised and the service they actually get (e.g.: speed).

IMPACTS

For business:Increased chances for price and quality competition as consumers are more aware of services received and can more easily change providers if they are unsatisfied or seek a different type of service.

For consumers: Will be protected against misleading offers and will have a real understanding of the service they are entitled to expect and the right to leave if they are not happy with it.

For the future: Better informed consumers can properly choose the service provider and offers that suit them best and obtain the services they paid for.

Vice President Neelie Kroes said: "These measures will achieve real transparency and enable consumers to give informed consent. You need to know what you are getting, and not getting, before you sign and pay. These EU-wide requirements are necessary to make European single consumer space work.”

A Connected Continent means new rights for consumers: #2 better contracts and more transparency

PROBLEMS

Today contracts are hard to understand, do not include critical information for the consumer, and are difficult to enforce or leave. Consumers are frequently locked in to internet and phone contracts. Barriers to switching include length of switching time, loss of the email address, high termination fees and long notice periods.

Almost half (44%) of the respondents experienced problems of some kinds when switching (study "The Functioning of the Market for Internet Access and Provision from a Consumer Perspective").

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

Extra information to be included in contracts including:

data volume limitations,

the actual data speeds,

how to monitor consumption and

an explanation of the practical impact of the service characteristics on the use of content, applications and services;

Contract periods:There can be no initial commitment exceeding 24 months, and a 12 month-only option must be provided

Contract roll-over: warning provided at least one month in advance, with an option to oppose tacit extension of the contract; in case where a contract rolls over the contract can be terminated without any costs with a 1 month notice.

Contract termination: consumer to gain right to terminate any contract after 6 months without penalty with a one-month notice period; reimbursement due only for residual value of subsidised equipment/promotions, if any. Any restriction on the use of the terminal equipment on other networks must be lifted free of charge once any due compensation of subsidies and/or promotion is paid.

Switching:

Explicit right to port within the shortest possible time. Direct charges to end-users, if any, should not act as a disincentive to change provider;

Explicit prohibition of switching users to another provider against their will;

Automatic cancellation of old contracts with losing providers after the switch without end-users having to contact their losing provider;

Right of pre-paid subscribers to obtain a refund of any remaining credit when switching;

Provision of email forwarding for customers from old ISP to new one (where this ISP previously provided an email address);

Non-allocation of the initial email address to another end-user at least before a period of two years.

TRANSPARENCY:

Provision of information on volumes, tariffs and quality of service provided, actual performance of service;

Mandatory availability of comparison tools provided by national regulator or accredited third parties to allow users to know the actual performance of electronic communication network access and services and the cost of alternative usage patterns;

For business: Increased chances for competition as consumers are more aware of services received and can change operators more easily. This leads to new opportunities for provides with attractive offers which meet consumer demands..

For consumers: Can hold service providers to account over service parameters offered; and can better enforce their rights if they are not respected. It becomes easier to change their provider. They can control their consumption and are protected against bill shocks.

For the future: Better informed consumers that can more easily enforce their rights. Satisfied consumers are more likely to increase their consumption. Netter service quality thanks to more switching and competition

Vice President Neelie Kroes said: “These measures will empower consumers to claim what they pay for. It will help you leave your provider you are aren’t getting what you pay for, or simply want a different type of service. You would have the same rights no matter where you are in Europe and who your provider is.”

"The new provisions on transparency and switching will substantially reinforce consumer rights and encourage competition between providers. These EU-wide requirements are necessary to make European single consumer place work.”

13. Rules fit for a telecoms single market

PROBLEMS

The current EU rules are not sufficient to deliver a telecoms single market.

SOLUTIONS OFFERED

Keep institutional changes to the minimum necessary to enable the single market including a full-time chair with a 3 year mandate to provide greater consistency and direction to work of BEREC (Body of European Regulators of Electronic Communcations).

This means greater co-ordination between national regulatory authorities with a key focus on identifying and then applying best practices, additional EU supervision of national regulatory decisions affecting companies that benefits from a single authorisation in the EU.

IMPACTS

For regulators: minimal changes to BEREC functions, more coordination between national regulators and Commission.

For businesses: simpler dealings with government

For consumers: easier to know who is in charge when you have a complaint

For the future: enables a full telecoms and digital single market

Vice President Neelie Kroes said “The proposal focuses on users rather than structures. The proposal affects co-ordination, but not the balance of competences between the European Commission and the Member State. There would therefore no shift of powers from Member States to Brussels. We are not, building new institutions. We are not abolishing bodies like BEREC.”