From a cyclists perspective such a 10-cent recycling refund for drink container scheme has the potential to reduce broken glass and other hazards so frequently found on shared paths and in the shallows on roads. I am sure we all are familiar with the good old glass introduced flat tyre.

Such a scheme as the 10-cent recycling refund for drink container has the potential to reduce the risks for cyclists but it also has greater positives for both the environment and the community.

I wish to make comment on theÂ Packaging Impacts Consultation Regulation Impact Statement

I believe that a 10-cent recycling refund for drink containers is the only effective way to tackle Australiaâ€™s growing problem with packaging waste and litter.

The beverage industryâ€™s alternative â€“ placing recycling bins in public places â€“ will not work and cannot take the place of a proven recycling refund solution that is already working in many countries.

Placing recycling bins in public places will do nothing to reduce litter. These bins become contaminated and vandalised and are a huge burden on the finances of local government. On the other hand, a recycling refund scheme will save money for local councils, reduce litter and pay people to do the right thing when they recycle.

For years, under theÂ National Packaging Covenant,Â recycling targets have not been met. We cannot let ineffective solutions and flawed industry schemes distract us any longer.

TheÂ Regulation Impact Statement (RIS)Â makes it clear the main packaging problem is beverage containers with overall recycling well below 50%, and away-from-home recovery at about 22%.Â Beverage containers need to be the priority for action.

A container deposit scheme will cost less than half a cent per container and will generate new sustainable recycling industries, jobs and investments. A recycling refund scheme also has the potential to support a network of recycling drop-off centres that could be used to collect electronic goods and other valuable waste material for recycling.

TheÂ RISÂ says a container deposit scheme is expensive because it requires investment in new infrastructure â€“ but this is investment by the private sector in recycling systems, which should be encouraged instead of treated as a cost.

Itâ€™s important for the community to participate in recycling, but they have to know it will benefit the environment. Only a container deposit scheme delivers clean material for recycling so we can save maximum energy and resources and reduce pollution globally and in our communities.

In the meantime if you see a hazard to cyclists on the road and paths including broken glass, please report it. There are a number of reporting options all documented here. Personally I use NeatstreetsÂ which is an application on my Google Nexus smartphone. Â This means I can report the hazard Â at the time I come across it, without having to remember the details for later on. Only takes a moment or two.

Your Turn To Talk

I hope you liked this post! Please do stop by the comment section below and share your thoughts on the call for a container deposit scheme with the rest of us.

I am always interested in others views so please do share your thoughts by leaving a comment below 🙂

Like this post? Please share ...

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

About Aushiker

Andrew Priest is a bicycle rider and bushwalker and a passionate advocate of cycling and rider road safety. He is mainly a commuter, bicycle tourist and occasional Audax rider. You can find Andrew on Google+, on Facebook and on Twitter