Forums

Battle of the Brands (Current battle: pg. 183)

The WC was shown in almost all nations worldwide. The Superbowl has a viewership of around 170 million, the WC last had a viewership of more than 600 million.

*Divides 600 million over 30 days* That's 20 million a day on average. The Super Bowl has 170 million for just a few hours.

(Previous battle has ended, so all discussion must be taken to user profiles to avoid confusion with the new battle.)------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Battle ends in 5 days! (Oh yeah, one vote for HP. Much better support, good products, and my cheap computer is still running strong!)

[quote]The WC was shown in almost all nations worldwide. The Superbowl has a viewership of around 170 million, the WC last had a viewership of more than 600 million.[/quote]\r\n\r\n*Divides 600 million over 30 days* That's 20 million a day on average. The Super Bowl has 170 million for just a few hours. \r\n\r\n(Previous battle has ended, so all discussion must be taken to user profiles to avoid confusion with the new battle.)\r\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n\r\nNext Battle:\r\n\r\n[b]Hewlett[/b]-[b]Packard[/b]:\r\n\r\n[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/29/HP_New_Logo_2D.svg/500px-HP_New_Logo_2D.svg.png[/img]\r\n\r\n[b]Vs.[/b]\r\n\r\n[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Dell_Logo.svg/500px-Dell_Logo.svg.png[/img]\r\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n\r\nBattle ends in 5 days! (Oh yeah, one vote for HP. Much better support, good products, and my cheap computer is still running strong!)

*Divides 600 million over 30 days* That's 20 million a day on average. The Super Bowl has 170 million for just a few hours.

(Previous battle has ended, so all discussion must be taken to user profiles to avoid confusion with the new battle.)

''Unsurprisingly the competitionÃ¢s most-watched match was the final between Spain and the Netherlands, which reached 619.7 million in-home viewers.''

I vote HP, because the computers I've always been using, and hence trusting, are made by HP.

[quote]*Divides 600 million over 30 days* That's 20 million a day on average. The Super Bowl has 170 million for just a few hours.\r\n\r\n(Previous battle has ended, so all discussion must be taken to user profiles to avoid confusion with the new battle.)[/quote]\r\n\r\n\r\n[i]''Unsurprisingly the competitionâ€™s most-watched match was the final between Spain and the Netherlands, which reached 619.7 million in-home viewers.''[/i]\r\n\r\nI vote HP, because the computers I've always been using, and hence trusting, are made by HP.

''Unsurprisingly the competitionÃ¢s most-watched match was the final between Spain and the Netherlands, which reached 619.7 million in-home viewers.''

Did you not notice that I requested any further discussion be taken to profiles?

[quote]''Unsurprisingly the competitionâ€™s most-watched match was the final between Spain and the Netherlands, which reached 619.7 million in-home viewers.''[/quote]\r\n\r\nDid you not notice that I requested any further discussion be taken to profiles?

Did you not notice that I requested any further discussion be taken to profiles?

No I didn't, nor do I see the need to, given the large symbols of computer companies that adorn half the page.

[quote]Did you not notice that I requested any further discussion be taken to profiles?[/quote]\r\n\r\nNo I didn't, nor do I see the need to, given the large symbols of computer companies that adorn half the page.

Look, Dapro turned over control of the thread to me. I expect you to at least be courteous enough to abide by any guidelines I set, even if you don't agree with them.

given the large symbols of computer companies that adorn half the page.

Don't blame it on them that you were failing to read my post, especially since they are before the logos.

[quote]No I didn't, nor do I see the need to[/quote]\r\n\r\nLook, Dapro turned over control of the thread to me. I expect you to at least be courteous enough to abide by any guidelines I set, even if you don't agree with them.\r\n\r\n[quote] given the large symbols of computer companies that adorn half the page.[/quote]\r\n\r\nDon't blame it on them that you were failing to read my post, especially since they are before the logos.

I would make a comment on your latest statements xeano, but, apparently I'm not allowed according to you.Can't even reply to statements on the last page of a thread.Looks like someone has a power craving.

Anyhow; I vote for HP, I've used more computers from them, and they seem like they're more durable.

I would make a comment on your latest statements xeano, but, apparently I'm not allowed according to you.\r\nCan't even reply to statements on the last page of a thread.\r\nLooks like someone has a power craving.\r\n\r\nAnyhow; I vote for HP, I've used more computers from them, and they seem like they're more durable.

[quote]No I didn't, nor do I see the need to\r\n\r\nLook, Dapro turned over control of the thread to me. I expect you to at least be courteous enough to abide by any guidelines I set, even if you don't agree with them.\r\n\r\ngiven the large symbols of computer companies that adorn half the page.\r\n\r\nDon't blame it on them that you were failing to read my post, especially since they are before the logos.[/quote]\r\n\r\nI follow the rules of the Forum, and tweak them to where I deem them to be applicable. I don't just follow any user laid down rule. \r\n\r\n\r\nMy old schools have always used Dell computers, old, sturdy, slow beasts of burden, hence my dislike of them.

I would make a comment on your latest statements xeano, but, apparently I'm not allowed according to you.

Where did I say that? I simply requested that users do not continue to reply to discussions on previous battles, but rather take the discussion to user profiles if you would like the discussion to continue. I requested this to avoid any confusion which might develop. What is wrong with that, may I ask?

Can't even reply to statements on the last page of a thread.

I didn't say you can't reply to stuff on the last page of the thread. I would say what I meant, but I would just be repeating the last paragraph.

Looks like someone has a power craving.

Are you kidding me? I request one thing, and all of a sudden I have a power craving? ha... Ha... HAHAHAHA!!!

I follow the rules of the Forum, and tweak them to where I deem them to be applicable. I don't just follow any user laid down rule.

Where did I lay down a rule? I'll say it again, I am merely requesting that you take discussion from previous battles to the profiles to avoid confusion! A simple request, and you guys are getting all upset.

If you must have a rule, I would think this request would be covered by paragraph 11 of the forum rules. The topic changes when I post a new battle, thus any discussion of previous battles would take the thread off topic. Am I not mistaken?

[quote]I would make a comment on your latest statements xeano, but, apparently I'm not allowed according to you.[/quote]\r\n\r\nWhere did I say that? I simply requested that users do not continue to reply to discussions on previous battles, but rather take the discussion to user profiles if you would like the discussion to continue. I requested this to avoid any confusion which might develop. What is wrong with that, may I ask? \r\n\r\n[quote]Can't even reply to statements on the last page of a thread.[/quote]\r\n\r\nI didn't say you can't reply to stuff on the last page of the thread. I would say what I meant, but I would just be repeating the last paragraph. \r\n\r\n[quote]Looks like someone has a power craving.[/quote]\r\n\r\nAre you kidding me? I request one thing, and all of a sudden I have a power craving? ha... Ha... HAHAHAHA!!!\r\n\r\n[quote]I follow the rules of the Forum, and tweak them to where I deem them to be applicable. I don't just follow any user laid down rule. [/quote]\r\n\r\nWhere did I lay down a rule? I'll say it again, I am merely requesting that you take discussion from previous battles to the profiles to avoid confusion! A simple request, and you guys are getting all upset. \r\n\r\nIf you must have a rule, I would think this request would be [url=http://armorgames.com/page/Forum-Rules]covered by paragraph 11 of the forum rules. [/url] The topic changes when I post a new battle, thus any discussion of previous battles would take the thread off topic. Am I not mistaken?

Flip a Coin...

Play free online games at Armor Games!

We strive to deliver the best online games experience on the internet, with thousands of free online games for kids, access to free mmorpg games, free online games for girls, online rpg games, fun online flash games, and more. We offer free flash games in many different genres: online shooting games, online puzzle games, online war games, free online car games, free online hidden object games and dozens more. This is the best place on the web to play online games for free... play on Armor Games! No matter what game style you prefer, we've got it here.

As one of the biggest free gaming websites, we offer thousands of new game reviews and ratings, making it easy for gamers to find new games every day. We offer only the best games from developers Jmtb02, Krin, ConArtist, Joey Betz, Tony Lavell, Louissi, Gameinabottle and of course Armor Games develops some of the best games around.

About Armor Games (ArmorGames.com, Armour Games, or Armored Games)

We are dedicated to providing our players the best online gaming experience on the internet! Visit every day to discover new games, achieve high scores, and participate in one of the most active gaming communities.

Submit a Game

Have your game played by millions of gamers! Armor Games welcomes game submissions from talented game developers. Not every game makes the cut, but if it does, we'll promote it on Armor Games and give you all the credit and link back to your site. Submit your game here and good luck!