AMD packages up another sub-£160 graphics card, this time calling it the Radeon R9 270. We expected a Radeon HD 7850 replacement, but received something quite different. Is it a worthwhile step up, or just a familiar piece of hardware with a paint job?

Particularly after the excitement of Radeon R9 290X, 290, and GeForce GTX 780 Ti, it's hard to get excited about re-branded products from previous-gen GPUs. Yet, from time to time, both AMD and Nvidia have been guilty of the recycling old processors and giving them new names. The worst cases of this are when a card with the same exact specifications, shader count, clock rates, and all, gets repackaged, adding confusion to the marketplace. Not everyone jumps online to read graphics card reviews, leaving a lot of people vulnerable to an "upgrade" they didn't need.

Re-branding is a little easier to accept if it's accompanied by performance increases along the price band. Nvidia did this with its GeForce GTX 770, upping speed and dropping cost. AMD's Radeon R9 280X similarly improved performance versus the Radeon HD 7970 and made Tahiti more affordable at the same time.

Today, AMD introduces another re-branded graphics card: the Radeon R9 270. Apparently, the company felt it wasn't enough to rename the product itself; it also started using Curacao to refer to the GPU we know as Pitcairn. We're not sure why. It's still calling the R9 280X's processor Tahiti, after all. But here's Curacao/Pitcairn again, in all of its glory:

"Pitcairn hosts 20 compute units, each with four vector units made up of 16 stream processors and a single texture unit. In an uncut GPU, those numbers multiply out to 1280 total shaders and 80 texture units. AMD shears off four compute units from Pitcairn to create the Radeon HD 7850, resulting in 1024 shaders and 64 texture units.

The GPU’s back-end is made up of eight render partitions, each with four full-color ROPs, totaling 32 ROPs. Four 64-bit memory controllers yield an aggregate 256-bit memory bus."

So if the Radeon R9 270X replaced the Radeon HD 7870, then we should expect its R9 270 to displace the cut-down Radeon HD 7850, right? But the comparison gets interesting when we look at the specs, clock rates, and prices of AMD's current line-up.

Radeon HD 7850

Radeon HD 7870

Radeon R9 270

Radeon R9 270X

Shader Cores

1024

1280

1280

1280

Texture Units

64

80

80

80

Color ROPs

32

32

32

32

Fabrication process

28 nm

40 nm

28 nm

28 nm

Core (Shader) Clock

860 MHz

1000 MHz

925 MHz

1050 MHz

Memory Clock

1200 MHz GDDR5

1200 MHz GDDR5

1400 MHz GDDR5

1400 MHz GDDR5

Memory Bus

256-bit

256-bit

256-bit

256-bit

Memory Bandwidth

153.6 GB/s

153.6 GB/s

179.2 GB/s

179.2 GB/s

Idle/Max Thermal Design Power

130 W

175 W

150 W

180 W

Power Connectors:

1 x 6-pin

2 x 6-pin

1 x 6-pin

2 x 6-pin

I was surprised to find that the Radeon R9 270 is not an overclocked Radeon HD 7850, as I expected. Rather, it's essentially a Radeon HD 7870 with a 75 MHz-slower core, 200 MHz-faster GDDR5 memory, a 25 W-lower TDP, and a £160 price tag.

First, let's consider those clock rates. The slower core frequency and faster RAM seems designed to deliver performance on par with the old Radeon HD 7870. This doesn't really make sense, though. Why down-clock Pitcairn and spend more on pricier GDDR5? The only hypothesis I have is that AMD wanted the 7870's performance, while ducking under the limit of one six-pin auxiliary power connector. As you can see, the Radeon R9 270 has a 150 W TDP compared to the Radeon HD 7870's 175 W ceiling. Both the Radeon R9 270X and HD 7870 require two of those connectors.

As for the price, that's around £10 cheaper than the recently-released Radeon R9 270X, a card with the same 1400 MHz memory clock, but a 125 MHz-higher core frequency (1050 MHz). Assuming boards really sell for £160 at launch, the Radeon R9 270 will end up a bit below the street price of a GeForce GTX 660, its main competitor from Nvidia. That also pushes the 270 below the average price of Radeon HD 7870, an offering we've seen heavily discounted over the past few months. This was only temporary as retailers sought to clear out inventory. We already know from AMD that the Radeon HD 7870 and 7850 are expected to disappear soon.

It's also worth noting that leveraging the Pitcairn/Curacao processor means the Radeon R9 270 and 270X do not support AMD's new TrueAudio feature. You'd need a Radeon R7 260 or Radeon R9 290 series card for that. AMD's Mantle API is supported, as it is with all GCN-based parts, but it remains to be seen how successful that will be.

Be warned that the new Radeon R9 series (270, 270X, 280X, 290, and 290X) are not part of AMD's Never Settle bundle. The good news is that AMD teamed up with DICE to provide a copy of Battlefield 4 for anyone buying one of those cards starting today. Picking up a Radeon R7 260X won't get you Battlefield 4, but you will get to choose two game titles from AMD's Silver tier of the company's Never Settle bundle program.

So the big question now is: how does the Radeon R9 270 perform compared to AMD's Radeon HD 7870? And is the newer board a good value compared to the GeForce GTX 660? We have a lot of benchmarks on the way to help answer that question. First, let's have a look at our test sample.

Sapphire's Radeon R9 270 has two dual-link DVI connectors, HDMI, and DisplayPort outputs. Because this board's power ceiling is 150 W, it only has one six-pin auxiliary power input. AMD dictates that the R9 270 only feature one CrossFire connector, limiting you to dual-card configurations.

to be honest i would say not worth it .. its gunna cost around £150-£170 for the R9 270 .. but also costs the same for 2gb HD 7850 so if you have the 2gb edition my opinion would be to crossfire that bad boy .. try to get the exact same edition of the one you had .. as i didnt .. and had to reflash bios for stability .. Im quite impressed with the R9 270's single card performance .. on avg my crossfire 7850s get 85-120fpsoverall very good review Thanks