" Contrary to the claims of "sexual rights" propagandists there is no agreement at the United Nations that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) can be used to create "rights" to abortion, to be a prostitute, to be a child who has sex as they choose or for Men who have Sex with men (MSM) to engage in fisting, felching, rimming, farming, scat, chariot racing, jackhammering , anal penetration etc ".

The European Union is marching at a brisk clip from Christianity into the satanic LGBTTT+ political ideology of sexual nihilism , sexual anarchy and gender confusion.

Many “priests” in institutions such as the Church of England are functional atheists with moral positions indistinguishable from that of Terrance Higgins Trust the produces of the the “Hard Cell Playroom”

It is therefore ironic that islam , which the satanic European atheists and functional atheists support in their (the atheists) intersectional war against christianity, is set to dominate Europe in a few decades so one could expect to see homosexuals being thrown off tall builds in Europe in the not to distant future.

Muslim births to overtake Christian births globally within two decades as Islamic population is expected to grow by 70% in the next 40 years
Islam could overtake Christianity as world’s largest religion by end of century
Christians accounted for 33% global births in recent years but also 37% of global deaths, according to Pew Research Center
Muslim population rose by over 150m in 2010-15 to 1.8bn; as of 2015, there were 2.3bn Christians
‘Christianity is literally dying in Europe,’ said lead Pew researcher
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4383662/Muslim-births-overtake-Christian-births-two-decades.html#ixzz4dRJGMDdT
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Pre-exposure prophylaxis or PreEP is like taking antibiotics which could damage one’s liver and kidney resulting in liver and kidney failure in order to satisfy an addiction for drinking water from sewers.

It is important to tell your doctor about any side effects you experience while taking TRUVADA for PrEP.

Serious side effects

Common side effects
TRUVADA can cause serious side effects:

Too much lactic acid in your blood (lactic acidosis), which is a serious medical emergency. Symptoms of lactic acidosis include weakness or being more tired than usual, unusual muscle pain, being short of breath or fast breathing, nausea, vomiting, stomach-area pain, cold or blue hands and feet, feeling dizzy or lightheaded, and/or fast or abnormal heartbeats.
Serious liver problems. Your liver may become large and tender, and you may develop fat in your liver. Symptoms of liver problems include your skin or the white part of your eyes turns yellow, dark “tea-colored” urine, light-colored stools, loss of appetite for several days or longer, nausea, and/or stomach-area pain.
You may be more likely to get lactic acidosis or serious liver problems if you are female, very overweight (obese), or have been taking TRUVADA for a long time. In some cases, these serious conditions have led to death. Call your healthcare provider right away if you have any symptoms of these conditions.
Worsening of hepatitis B (HBV) infection. If you also have HBV and take TRUVADA, your hepatitis may become worse if you stop taking TRUVADA. Do not stop taking TRUVADA without first talking to your healthcare provider. If your healthcare provider tells you to stop taking TRUVADA, they will need to watch you closely for several months to monitor your health. TRUVADA is not approved for the treatment of HBV.
Serious side effects of TRUVADA may also include.

Kidney problems, including kidney failure. Your healthcare provider may do blood tests to check your kidneys before and during treatment with TRUVADA for PrEP. If you develop kidney problems, your healthcare provider may tell you to stop taking TRUVADA for PrEP.
Bone problems, including bone pain or bones getting soft or thin, may lead to fractures. Your healthcare provider may do tests to check your bones.
Changes in body fat, which can happen in people taking TRUVADA or medicines like TRUVADA.

As is to be expected the sexual nihilists and sexual anarchists who follow the “sexual rights” LGBTTTIQA + ideology are not only dunce they are also diseased.

“Between 2014 and 2015, the number of reported primary and secondary (P&S) cases in the United States increased by 19%, and there were 23,872 P&S syphilis cases reported in 2015. Most (60%) of these cases were among MSM.”

Once nearly eliminated in the U.S., syphilis is increasing, especially among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM).

MSM Fact Sheet | View Images of Symptoms

The content here can be syndicated (added to your web site).

Print Version
Commercial Print Version

What is syphilis?

Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection that can cause serious health problems if it is not treated. Syphilis is divided into stages (primary, secondary, latent, and tertiary), and there are different signs and symptoms associated with each stage..

Should I be concerned about syphilis?

Most cases of syphilis in the United States are among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. (MSM), and syphilis has been increasing among MSM for more than a decade. If syphilis is not treated, it can cause serious health problems, including neuralgic (brain and nerve) problems, eye problems, and even blindness. In addition, syphilis is linked to an increased risk of transmission of HIV infection.

How could I get syphilis?

Any sexually -active person can get syphilis. Syphilis can be transmitted during anal sex and oral sex, as well as vaginal sex. Syphilis is passed from person to person through direct contact with a syphilis sore. In men, sores can occur on or around the penis, around the anus, or in the rectum, or in or around the mouth. These sores can be painless, so it is possible to have them and not notice them. Correct use of condoms can reduce the risk of syphilis if the condom covers the sores. However, sometimes sores occur in areas not covered by a condom. It is still possible to get syphilis from contact with these sores. You cannot get syphilis through casual contact with objects such as toilet seats, doorknobs, swimming pools, hot tubs, bathtubs, shared clothing, or eating utensils.

What does syphilis look like?

Syphilis is divided into stages (primary, secondary, latent, and tertiary), and there are different signs and symptoms associated with each stage. A person with primary syphilis generally has a sore or sores at the original site of infection. These sores usually occur on or around the genitals, around the anus or in the rectum, or in or around the mouth. These sores are usually (but not always) firm, round, and painless. Symptoms of secondary syphilis include skin rash, swollen lymph nodes, and fever. The signs and symptoms of primary and secondary syphilis can be mild, and they might not be noticed. During the latent stage, there are no signs or symptoms. Tertiary syphilis is associated with severe medical problems and is usually diagnosed by a doctor with the help of multiple tests. It can affect the heart, brain, and other organs of the body.

A detailed description of each stage of syphilis can be found on CDC’s syphilis fact sheet.

How common is syphilis among MSM?

Between 2014 and 2015, the number of reported primary and secondary (P&S) cases in the United States increased by 19%, and there were 23,872 P&S syphilis cases reported in 2015. Most (60%) of these cases were among MSM.

Members of Vancouver’s Christian community and city officials are furiously trying to stop controversial Christian evangelist Franklin Graham from speaking to thousands of people at an event next week at Rogers Arena.

Graham is speaking at the Festival of Hope event that’s being organized by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.

“This is unusual for us to deal with in Vancouver – this kind of individual and this kind of hate rhetoric,” said Councillor Tim Stevenson.

Graham is a polarizing figure who has drawn attention for comments that denigrate minorities. He’s been quoted calling on the U.S. “to use weapons of mass destruction if need be” and referring to Islam as “a very evil and a very wicked religion.”

Most recently, the son of famous televangelist Billy Graham took the spotlight for reading a passage of scripture at the inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump.

In the past, he’s made disparaging remarks about homosexuals, once praising Russian President Vladmir Putin for his oppressive stance toward members of the LGBTQ community.

“We live in a country that has free speech, but there’s a difference between free speech and hate speech” said Stevenson, who is also an ordained minister of the United Church of Canada.

Stevenson said the worry is that Graham will incite hate speech and that’s concerning in light of the recent attack at a Quebec mosque that left six dead.

“The city has an issue of safety here and we’re really concerned about it.”

On Feb. 10, Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson was part of a meeting of 14 local leaders from evangelical, Anglican, Roman Catholic and other Christian groups.

They’ve now penned a letter to organizers pushing for Franklin to be removed from the event.

“We have no problem with someone coming to preach the gospel. But it can’t be such a divisive figure that’s so anti-Muslim, anti-gay, anti-black,” said Tom Cooper, a minister and the president of the City in Focus Group.

A petition has also been launched calling for Franklin’s removal.

Both Stevenson and Cooper said if the situation was reversed, there would be an uproar.

“If there was a fiery imam that came to Vancouver and held a rally with 30,000 Muslims and his rhetoric had been of the same nature — the hatred toward Christians — we know we’d have people tramping into city hall saying: ‘What are you doing about this imam?'” said Stevenson.

Organizers not backing down

“With every Festival of Hope we do in every city around the world there’s always going to be some opposition to what we’re doing,” said Frank King of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association of Canada, who are organizing the festival.

King said the association acknowledges the opposition, but said it has no plans to remove Franklin Graham from the event, which he said has taken years to plan.

“To even entertain any kind of thought of changing any event … we simply would not do that.”

The three-day event is meant to spread the message of Christianity and invites non-Christians to attend.

“He’ll be inviting people to become Christians at each of these events – that’s his sole purpose for being here in Vancouver,” said King.

Local groups helping organize the event echo that view.

“Franklin Graham is not coming to present an American political situation or his perspectives politically,” said Giulio Lorefice Gabeli, a pastor with the Westwood Community Church.

“It really has nothing to do with the Festival of Hope. It has nothing to do with him coming here. To me, I feel there’s a lot of fear that’s being generated that is unfounded.”

Garth Rattray | The Incongruity Of Jamaican Rape
Published:Monday | February 20, 2017 | 12:00 AM
I am not pushing or facilitating anyone’s agenda, but we cannot legislate sexuality. How people feel and what they do privately is beyond our control.

As long as someone’s sexual programming does not involve the participation of another human being who is incapable of having consensual sexual intercourse, what two consenting adults do in private is between them and their God. I won’t dignify bestiality with a comment. Interestingly, though, there’s a growing controversy regarding robots manufactured and programmed to give sexual pleasure to humans.

Our country is saddled with the impossible task of objectively redefining ‘rape’. I am opposed to the currently accepted general definition because it employs the use of the word ‘intercourse’. The dictionary definition is, ‘Forced sexual intercourse; sexual assault; sexual intercourse between an adult and a minor. Rape may be heterosexual (involving members of opposite sexes) or homosexual (involving members of the same sex). Rape involves insertion of an erect penis or an inanimate object into the female vagina or the male anus. Legal definitions of rape may also include forced oral sex and other sexual acts.’

I take exception because sexual ‘intercourse’ suggests mutuality – ‘lovemaking, making love, sex act, act of love, sexual relations, intimate relations, intimacy, coupling, mating, going to bed with someone, sleeping with someone’. Rape has nothing to do with love or intimate relations. It’s a frightfully brutal act of unspeakable violence and the demonstration of power over another, and should be on par with homicide.

In Jamaica, our definition of rape fails to mention anal or oral penetration. It is constrained by a law dating back to January 1, 1864 – that was not very long after slavery was officially abolished. That was also the year before the Morant Bay Rebellion and about 80 years before full universal adult suffrage. That is 153 years (more than six generations) ago.

RESOUNDING DENIAL

The wording of the law betrays blatant naivety or resounding denial of human sexual practices. It erroneously assumes that peno-anal intercourse only occurs between homosexual males. That is very far from what obtains in reality. It also makes no mention of other orifices used during sexual intercourse.

Even our ‘modern’ Sexual Offences Act skilfully uses wording that does not mention ‘insertion’ of the penis into the anus. It confines ‘sexual intercourse’ as the penetration of the vagina of one person by the penis of another person and ‘rape’ as a man having sexual intercourse with a woman under certain specified circumstances.

The Church is perfectly right to adhere to its religious beliefs, but society has come out of the closet. The reality is that individuals have been engaged in sexual practices that do not conform to what most people choose to view as ‘normal’.

Therein lies the dilemma in Jamaica. Since peno-anal ‘sex’ is so illegal that it cannot exist, peno-anal rape (of a male or a female) also cannot exist. As some have painstakingly pointed out, the range of possible punishment for rape and for grievous sexual assault are very different. So, if an offender forces his penis inside a female’s vagina, he will be charged for rape and risks extremely long incarceration.

But, if he forces his penis inside her anus/rectum (which must be far more brutal, painful, degrading, far more physically dangerous, far more likely to transmit any disease, and far more likely to cause permanent psychological damage/devastation), he could receive a far lighter sentence!

Seems to me that the law gives despicable sexual predators the green light to force their victims into anal and/or oral penetration. The suggestion to equate ‘rape’ (from the Latin, rapere – to seize or take by force all pride, privacy, dignity, self-determination and sometimes, sanity) and ‘grievous sexual assault’ significantly diminishes the horror and trauma experienced by rape victims and is terribly unfair to them. The language and, therefore, psychological impact of ‘rape’ and ‘sexual assault’ are vastly different.

Is this what we want? Young and old women and men, boys and girls violated by dangerous, sadistic, perverted, cruel monsters, who could receive relatively light sentences simply because they choose to torture and mercilessly violate their victims by forcefully penetrating their mouths, anus/rectum? Or do we need to separate Church from State?

Published:Friday | February 10, 2017 | 12:00 AM
A parliamentary committee has been tasked to come up with a ‘perfect definition’ of rape, and the lobbyists are lining up, sensing the high stakes.

Rape is sexual intercourse which, if mutually performed, would be legal, but which lacks the consent of one of the partners. At the moment, the definition of rape is limited to a man placing his penis into a woman’s vagina without her consent, because, in law, only penis-vagina penetration is recognised as sexual intercourse.

The suggested approach ‘to be fair to the boys’ is to change the definition of sexual intercourse to include other activities, such as anal intercourse, penetration of the mouth, or penetration by non-sex organs and objects. Therefore, any of these activities performed without the consent of one of the parties would now be called rape, and would attract the same penalty as forced penis-vagina penetration.

Placing all these other activities under the category of ‘sexual intercourse’ puts them on equal footing with penis-vagina penetration, and normalises them. Changing the definition of rape to include forced anal sex will imply that consensual buggery should be legal, and is a samfie attempt to legalise buggery through the back door. That is why J-FLAG and the pro-gay public defender support the redefinition.

But what is the injury that the redefinition is supposed to redress? Currently, men who sexually impose themselves upon other men can be charged with ‘grievous sexual assault’, which carries a maximum penalty on summary conviction in the parish court of a prison term not exceeding three years, and on conviction in the circuit court, to imprisonment for life or other penalties in the discretion of the judge, but not less than a 15-year prison term.

Buggery itself carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. The crime of rape (forced vaginal penetration), as currently defined, carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for life.

DISPARITY IN PENALTIES

Quite correctly, the commentators are pointing out the present disparity between the penalties for rape and grievous sexual assault tried in the

parish court, although, as you can see, the disparity is not great. Their call, they say, for the redefinition of sexual intercourse – and therefore rape – will equalise the penalties for the offences, and will be ‘fair to the boys’.

But it is not hard to see the ginnalship. What it will really do is provide the grounds for an argument to equalise and legalise and normalise all forms of sexual intercourse, including buggery, as long as there is consent of all the parties, and that is why the LGBTQI activists and all the libertarians have taken to the airwaves and the print media to support it.

And it is no surprise that the Jamaica Coalition for a Healthy Society and other Christian groups have quickly come out against this attempt to normalise what they consider to be abnormal, unnatural and bestial acts; and predictably, this has drawn the fire of anti-Christian elements in the media. We have our culture wars here in Jamaica, too!

If the goal is to equalise in law the punishment of forced anal sex and forced vaginal sex, the obvious and easiest approach is to equalise the penalties for rape (forced vaginal sex) and grievous sexual assault (which includes forced anal sex and many other things besides). This much simpler solution to the imbalance is much more elegant than going through a redefinition of sexual intercourse, which carries with it so many contentious implications.

But, of course, if the real intention is to provide a route to legalise buggery, rather than any sympathy for the plight of buggered boys, the lobbyists will simply continue to press for redefinition.

The news reports state that Minister Delroy Chuck has tasked the parliamentary committee to come up with a “perfect definition” of rape that will satisfy the “United Nations and also the public at large”. One might ask, why is the United Nations pushing this gay agenda on us? And why is the Government seeking to satisfy the United Nations rather than the citizens of Jamaica?

I believe that Minister Chuck has given the parliamentary committee an impossible task, for I do not see how one can satisfy both those who wish to normalise LGBTQI sex, and the Church (and the wider Jamaican society), at the same time.

As the USA comes to its senses and seeks to overturn the legal ‘victories’ of their LGBTQI forces, it would be unwise for us to depart from the traditional values that have served us well for so long.

Texas Southern University is ending Kim Burrell’s radio show “Bridging the Gap” after publicity gained by her anti-gay comments, KTRK reports.

The weekly show debuted in June 2016 and promised listeners Burrell’s “unique take on music, life and society” in a station press release. The show aired Sunday afternoons on the university’s radio station KTSU.

The Houston Chronicle also reports that Burrell’s television talk show “Keep It Moving with Kim Burrell” on CW is no longer listed on the station’s log. The show was started in September.

The controversy started when video of Burrell giving a virulently homophobic sermon surfaced last week. “I came to tell you about sin. That sin nature, that perverted homosexual spirit, and the spirit of delusion and confusion, it has deceived many men and women. You as a man, you open your mouth and take a man’s penis in your face, you are perverted. You are a woman and will shake your face in another woman’s breast, you are perverted.”

After the video surfaced, Burrell said on Facebook that she does not hate LGBT people. “I came on because I care about God’s creation. And every person from the LGBT and any other kind of thing that is supporting gay, I never said LGBT last night, I said S-I-N.”

Several other artists who appeared on the Hidden Figures soundtrack with Burrell have spoken out against Burrell, including Pharrell who wrote, “I condemn hate speech of any kind.”

The singer was scheduled to perform a duet with Pharrell on “The Ellen Show” today, but was dropped as a guest after the video of Burrell’s homophobic comments surfaced.