Search This Blog

Thursday, August 21, 2014

A New Surprise Benefit of Cutting Lead Pollution

a guest post by the awesome Green Miles ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Studies have shown a strong connection between the phase-out of lead in
gasoline starting in the mid-1970s and a plunge in violent crime in the
following decades. As Kevin Drum reports at Mother Jones, a new study is connecting lower levels of childhood lead exposure to a later drop in the teen pregnancy rate:

For years conservatives bemoaned the problem of risky and violent
behavior among children and teens of the post-60s era, mostly blaming it
on the breakdown of the family and a general decline in discipline.
Liberals tended to take this less seriously, and in any case mostly
blamed it on societal problems. In the end, though, it turned out that
conservatives were right. It wasn't just a bunch of oldsters complaining
about the kids these days. Crime was up, drug use was up, and teen
pregnancy was up. It was a genuine phenomenon and a genuine problem.

But liberals were right that it wasn't related to the disintegration of
the family or lower rates of churchgoing or any of that. After all,
families didn't suddenly start getting back together in the 90s and
churchgoing didn't suddenly rise. But teenage crime, drug use, and
pregnancy rates all went down. And down. And down.

Most likely, there was a real problem, but it was a problem no one had a
clue about. We were poisoning our children with a well-known
neurotoxin, and this toxin lowered their IQs, made them into fidgety
kids, wrecked their educations, and then turned them into juvenile
delinquents, teen mothers, and violent criminals. When we got rid of the
toxin, all of these problems magically started to decline.

Today, we're debating whether to cut the toxic heavy metal and carbon
pollution from coal by shutting down the oldest, dirtiest coal-fired
power plants. But the benefits aren't hidden - we know coal kills thousands of people every year and causes thousands more asthma attacks in children.

Electricity rates and jobs are obviously important, but why do reporters
talk almost exclusively about those, and hardly at all about these very
real impacts on our lives? When did human health become a sidebar
story?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crossposted at The Green Miles