School Homosexualization in Ontario – Straight from Queen’s Park

May.13,2012

Davina: get the gay alliances into the Catholic schools!

Yesterday I went to Queen’s Park (the location of the Ontario Parliament building) to cover a rally organized by the Ontario GSA Coalition, an organization, which is trying to push the so-called “Gay-Straight Alliances” on our schools.

According to some of the websites, which promoted the event, they expected several hundred people to attend, but the turnout was low – most likely well below 100.

The GSA crowd

Before going into details about the rally itself, let me give you some background. It will help you understand why that initiative is so bizarre.

I learned about the event from an e-mail sent to me by the Centre for Inquiry. Years ago, that was an organization supposed to promote free thinking and rationalism. Later they deteriorated into becoming one of the numerous lefty groups, which support strange fringe causes. Last year, after the Mosqueteria scandal erupted at Valley Park Middle school, it took CFI’s director Justin Trottier over a month to make a statement about the case.

While Justin is reluctant to condemn the Islamic school invasion, he and his colleagues have no problem bashing the Catholic schools. In the e-mail they wrote:

“RIGHT NOW the fundamental rights of students are being violated in Ontario.

Catholic schools are denying students the right to form Gay-Straight Alliance groups (GSAs)

This denies LGBT students the right to create groups which work to:

Create safe environments in schools for students to support each other and learn about homophobia, transphobia, and other oppressions,

Educate the school community about homophobia, transphobia, gender identity, and sexual orientation issues, and

Fight discrimination, harassment, and violence in schools.

Research shows three-quarters of LGBTQ students feel unsafe at school and that GSA clubs are one part of the solution. Supporting GSAs is not treating one group differently. Those who oppose GSAs are guilty of doing just that.”

Before CFI was a place where you could listen to and debate with witty and creative people (like Dr. Robert Buckman, John Robert Colombo, etc.) – now you see them talking about “transphobia”, “gender identity” and other weird concepts, which make sense only within the walls of OISE. And now they want to force the Catholic schools to accept homosexual organizations.

I am well aware of the potential wrath of the militant gay lobby when I discuss those issues. That’s why I always put in the text my standard disclaimer: I have absolutely nothing against homosexuals, provided they keep their sexual activities within bedrooms, bathhouses, gay bar toilets or other confined spaces and don’t make children part of those activities.

And this is the problem here – GSA’s are organizations, which will be promoted among children, and “learning about homophobia” would inevitably include “education” about gay sex.

Further down in the message, CFI quoted some of the opponents of GSA, probably with the purpose to show what unenlightened bigots they are:

“Here’s what the opponents of the Bill are saying

“I was bullied in school. I don’t believe sexual orientation is a cause of bullying.”- Rabbi Mendel Kaplan

“This Bill 13 smacks of social engineering. As a mom I don’t want my children taught there are six genders.” -Kim Galvao (Chair of Concerned Catholic Parents of Ontario)

“Are our children second class? This creates a tiered system… This Bill 13 embraces the teaching of a radical sex ed.” -Charles McVety (President, Canada Family Action Coalition)

“Many congregations rent space in schools for their Sun worship. Bill is a Trojan horse to promote an agenda. Has nothing to do w bullying.” -Rondo Thomas (Executive Director of the Evangelical Association)”

What is wrong with a mother who says that she is disturbed by the concept of “six genders”? Apparently CFI has abandoned the scientific thinking and accepts as gospel the “gender identity” ramblings of mentally disturbed people.

Ironically, two of the people, quoted as “enemies” of the anti-bulling bill, are themselves victims of homosexual bullying. The Jewish community knows quite well how Rabbi Kaplan was dragged through the mud for months for expressing his religion’s views on homosexuality. Dr. Charles McVety went through a similar ordeal for the same reason – his TV show was censored and eventually cancelled. It takes quite a nerve to attack two religious leaders on the bullying issue, when they have been silenced by the mighty gays.

After reading the enemy quotes, I was left with the eerie feeling that something is missing. Of course! Where is the Islamic opinion?

I happen to remember the statement on homosexuality of Abdullah Hakim Quick, a prominent Canadian imam and Islamic scholar:

“They said, what is the Islamic position on “homosexuality”? And I told them: Put my name in the paper. The punishment is death. And I’m not going to change this religion.”

The quote is much worse than any other in the list and it is very well known, but it is not included and no other Muslim opinions are included either. Why is that? The reason is actually very simple – Rabbi Kaplan and Dr. McVety are a very easy target. What can a Rabbi do to you? The worst thing he can do is to curse you in Yiddish. And the Christian Minister can say something similar, but he still won’t go beyond words.

At the same time, a Muslim barbarian has a wide array of tools, which could put you in your rightful place if you don’t behave – he can shoot you; he can bomb you; he can set you on fire; he can spray acid in your face. The possibilities are endless… None of the CFI cowards, Justin and his buddies, would take the risk of enraging a bearded savage.

And the last point they were making in the message was about Bill 13, so I had to check it out and here is what I found quoted on the Ontario Parliament site:

“Bill 13 2011

An Act to amend the Education Act with respect to bullying and other matters

The people of Ontario and the Legislative Assembly:

… Believe that students need to be equipped with the knowledge, skills, attitude and values to engage the world and others critically, which means developing a critical consciousness that allows them to take action on making their schools and communities more equitable and inclusive for all people, including LGBTTIQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, transsexual, two-spirited, intersexed, queer and questioning) people;”

It is funny that McGuinty and his stooges adhere to the idiotic gay terminology (maybe the spirit of Smitherman is still floating around the building). The homosexual alphabet soup describing the queer universe had a few more letters added to it. What in the world does “questioning” mean? Is that some kind of an insecure homosexual or a tranny, who at any moment may return to his/her/its original state? And what’s the difference between “gay” and “queer”? Wasn’t it supposed to be the same thing? Maybe if Justin Trottier has kept the humanistic and rational nature of his organization, he could’ve given me the answer.

So CFI was one of the major forces behind the GSA drive. However, the rest of the organizers and speakers were even more remarkable. For example, the unions were there as well, like the Canadian Autoworkers union and its queer division (with the rainbow flags in the picture):

The queer unions...

Correct me if I’m wrong, but weren’t the unions created to defend the labour interests of their members? After all, that’s how they make their money – from collecting members’ dues. Instead they are fighting transphobia.

The main speaker was Fred Hahn, the president of the notorious CUPE Ontario.

Comrade Fred Hahn

He kept rambling about how important was to get that anti-bullying bill going. From his words it appeared like the only purpose in the lives of his union’s 50,000 members is to get that law passed.

The fiery union rhetoric of Comrade Hahn paled when compared with the quiet, but vile passion of the next speaker. That was Davina Hader, the tranny whom McGuinty handpicked to deal with the stubborn resistance of the Catholic schools to his government’s intention to destroy them.

Davina with Martine Stonehouse

When Davina was appointed a few months ago to take a major part in our Premier’s campaign to ensure homosexual diversity in Ontario’s education, he/she/it was quoted as saying:

“The problem the Liberals have been up against with regard to GSAs is the separate school board,” Hader says. “Boards have been saying ministry policies are not enforceable because Catholic schools have special rights. Well, they can’t use that card anymore. This is a push for equality in education right across the board. With this we are teaching the people at the top, and they’re going to have to listen. It will be mandated as part of their curriculum. They won’t have a choice. Queer youth are being bullied and some are killing themselves, this is something that will go a long way to help our youth and effectively change the way the next generation looks at queer people.”

What a feisty tranny – those damn Catholics won’t have any right to be different and would be forced to listen. The speech at the rally wasn’t that different. He/she/it stated that Bill 13 has already past second reading. Additionally, Davina has already been working on including the “gender identity” in Ontario’s Human Rights Act.

Then we heard three more speakers – students, who were going to be the foot soldiers, destined to implement the homosexual alliances in Ontario’s schools.

Even more speakers

Although the crowd wasn’t that big, the people showed clearly what they stood for:

Too bad he is not on the run...

It’s nice to have the Sexual Intellectuals on the Run in the forefront of the fight against what’s left of the Christian religion in our country. I am curious how those pansies are going to introduce their point of view in Muslim schools.

And of course, there was no way to avoid the lie that promoting homosexuality in schools would make everything in them fine and dandy:

Care to provide any proof?

And I had no idea that GSA’s are simply an innocent support group (it looks like the sex club option would be more appropriate):

It's more like a residential sex club...

Take a look at the next picture:

It's all Catholics' fault!

It is clear that the tiny “right-wing” phrase was added after the sign was completed and somebody noticed that saying “Catholics don’t like gays” might not be the best generalization they can come up with.

And I am not sure how safe would this hijab girl would be after attending a gay rally:

Hijabs and gays - what is her imam going to say?

It was an interesting experience to observe all those people –the deluded, the Marxists, the freaks – and think how they are united by the frightening idea of destroying the world around them. The scariest part is the ease with which they are ready to ruin traditions and ideas that have sustained our civilization for hundreds of years.

Morality doesn’t mean anything anymore – the most important part is to get rid of all institutions that maintain it. They make it look like those gay alliances are just innocent kids’ groups, while in reality they are opening the floodgates to more destruction, because the groups will need homosexual councillors and guides, who, once inside the Catholic schools, would start to erode them methodically.

Recently that repulsive faggot Dan Savage (he called himself a faggot in his column years ago, so that’s good enough for me) attacked religion and the Bible in particular during an appearance at a high school. There is no reason to think that anything different would happen here when the perverts who run the gay parade take control over the GSA’s. Then we may see the TNT men in schools:

However, this so-called “toolkit” does not seem to advocate much “respect” for parents who don’t want schools promoting same-sex marriage, cross-dressing and public nudity to children, against their will. The GLSEN toolkit encourages terachers to look at opportune moments to introduce their proaganda to kids. For example, when teaching maths, bring in “Rosa”and her two Dads who are out shpping for three boxes of pasta (yes, really). It also advises teachers to start using laguage that does not distinguish between the sexes. It goes on….“A hetero-normative viewpoint is one that expresses heterosexuality as a given instead of being one of many possibilities. … The assumption (reinforced by imagery and practice) that a boy will grow up and marry a woman is based on such a viewpoint,”

This obviously ignores the reality that, when given the opportunity to make their voices heard, the majority of voters (in the USA) have affirmed marriage as the union between a man and a woman via individual state votes. Obasma would dearly love to overrule the states via the Supreme Court, but we’ll see what happens during the presidential elections.

Having said that, we in Canada sit by and watch our democracy slowly fade into irrelevance as radical organizations and special interest groups continue to make inroads into every facet of our society (including our public school system) with the help of useful idiots like Dalton Mcguinty.