Warren_Baird at cimmetry.com writes:
> 1. submit smaller patches periodically between snapshots, but possibly
> patches made against out-of-date code.
>> 2. submit larger patches every time a new snapshot comes out, including all
> the changes I've made since the last snapshot.
>> Option 1 has the advantage that I can submit smaller patches, but 2 has the
> advantage that the patches are more likely to be up-to-date.
>> My inclination is towards option 2, but I thought I would ask on the list and
> see if there was a preference here...
Smaller patches are always better; and if they are small enough it
doesn't really matter if they are not up to date, I can merge them
easily. So option 1 is the best choice.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.com