One of those conditions is "organ transplant". It does not distinguish between donor and recipient which is odd, considering one has to be checked out extensively to donate a kidney. I fail to see why that should be regarded as a risk factor - recipient yes of course, donor no.

Please note: if the applicant has previously held a CAA medical certifcate and informs you that they have been made ‘unft’ at any time, you must refer the applicant to an AME.

A literal interpretation of this would suggest that a temporary grounding on an existing valid certificate (whilst for instance any possible side effects of a new medication are assessed) would prevent issue of an LAPL medical by a GP?This must apply in many instances, although presumably if the applicant did not so “inform you” then issue would be permissible.