“I design for real women like Kristen Stewart and Anna Kendrick.” Oooh…so easy to take out of context. I’m sure he meant that he designs for real women for award shows and other things like that. But how much do you want to bet that a tabloid is going to report that he’s now designing Kristen’s wedding dress for an “impending marriage” with Rob?

Don’t know if his comments were taken out of context or not, but you have to be very careful with Twitter. If you only have a few words, they can be taken the wrong way sometimes. But taken just in the context they were given, he sounds kind of put off by it. It makes me wonder…why didn’t he come out a week ago and deny it? Was it because he was being considered and didn’t get chosen? Makes me wonder….

I think he didn’t think before he tweeted. The Sex and the City characters he designed for are not real women. They are characters. So was he trying to say he wouldn’t design for the character of Bella specifically without actually saying that? His first tweet (without Kristen or Anna’s names) sounds like an insult to Kristen, the second sounds like an insult to the character of Bella. He could have just said, “no I’m not involved in the film.”

I am delighted, now he can go back to designing stuff for those anorexic popsicle sticks on Americas next top model. I am curious if he thought that Bellas character was going to be portrayed by a cartoon character or what? Pretty sure the sex in the city gals are fictional characters too, hello! I hope when the truth came out it turns out that his crap was turned down by Stehanie, now that would be funny, lol.