Breadcrumb Trail Links

Opinion: Short-term rentals: Secondary suites aren’t secondary

Author of the article:

Lis Pimentel, Ulrike Rodrigues

Publishing date:

July 21, 2017 • 3 minute read

FILE PHOTO The New York Apartments at 2341 York Ave. which the City of Vancouver investigated because the owner was illegally operating 17 Airbnb units out of 29 apartments, in Vancouver, BC., September 28, 2016.NICK PROCAYLO/ PNG

Article Sidebar

Trending

Article content

If you could run a pharmacy in the basement of a single-family home, it’d probably help you pay down the mortgage. Ditto a car dealership, or a diner, or cocktail lounge. But you can’t. Not in Vancouver, or in most other Canadian cities. So why should you be allowed to run a ghost hotel in a basement zoned for stable residential housing?

Twice this month, The Vancouver Sun has published editorials critiquing Vancouver’s proposed short-term rental bylaw. An editorial called for “a light touch” when regulating Airbnb. Then, Toronto-based Airbnb lobbyist Alex Dagg had her own editorial published, calling for “flexibility.”

Flexibility is one of the new talking points for Airbnb lobbyists. But here’s the thing: cities are already flexible. Airbnb is doing best in markets where rental accommodation is scarce and housing prices are sky-high. Excessive flexibility is what allowed the short-term rental industry to grow in cities with a housing crisis in the first place.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

Flexibility meant that investors were allowed to buy up multiple condos, renting them out as “ghost hotels” to guests they’d never meet in buildings that were supposed to be secure for long-term residents. Flexibility meant that landlords have got away with evicting long-term tenants so that they could earn more renting to visitors. Flexibility meant cities didn’t hold short-term rental sites accountable for a litany of preventable problems that are always blamed on overzealous “hosts” instead.

Despite all this, Vancouver is considering a bylaw to legalize the short-term rental business, as long as it happens in a person’s principal residence. Under the circumstances, that’s flexible.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

Too often, this debate is framed as being open to new technology. But as Airbnb itself admits, bed and breakfast tourism has been around for centuries. Long before Airbnb arrived in Vancouver, this city had a thriving B&B industry, with licenses, inspections, proper zoning and online bookings.

The technology hasn’t changed. What has changed: corporate chutzpah, financed by commodification. As Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson rightly noted, by distributing its hotel rooms through residential areas, Airbnb has become the largest hotel in Vancouver, as it is in many other cities. You can be sure how we’d react if the second, the fifth, or the fiftieth largest hotels asked for a “light touch” to expand without legal review or permission into condo towers or quiet streets simply because a few residents invited them in.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

Which brings us to the most controversial part of Vancouver’s draft bylaw: the proposal to restrict short-term rentals in secondary suites. In her editorial, Dagg argues it’s no loss to the rental market to let a secondary suite owner rent it on Airbnb if they never intended to rent to a long-term tenant. She insists doing so will help residents pay high mortgage costs. It’s a clever effort to reframe Airbnb from an enemy of home renters into a friend of home buyers.

There’s two problems with these claims. First, secondary suites (and their laneway home cousins) are separate units, with certain rights attached. A key reason Vancouver made them legal in traditional neighbourhoods in the first place was to add affordable long-term rental housing supply. If the goal had been to make it easier for people to run home-based businesses, the city would have legalized a dozen other disruptive commercial uses in homes, too. They didn’t.

Advertisement

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

If Vancouver exempts secondary suites from the new bylaw, homeowners will face the same temptation they face in other cities already. Owners will all claim they no longer want to rent to the long-term market. And why would they, when they can make three times as much churning tourists through their suite instead? Investors will sweep in to buy homes with suites for their hotel value, not their housing value, driving up the cost of housing even more.

The City of Vancouver should flip Airbnb’s argument around. Since these suites were legalized to increase the stock of affordable long-term rental housing, if the owner wants to take their unit out of that market, then the suite should lose its status completely, and all the privileges that come with it.

The proposed Vancouver bylaw is already flexible — and that’s fair. But let’s not make it so flexible that it reorganizes the legal, residential foundation of entire neighbourhoods simply to help one giant multinational to attract a few more customers.

Lis Pimentel is the chair of Canada’s Fairbnb.ca coalition for fair regulations for short-term rentals, based in Toronto. Ulrike Rodrigues of Homes not Hotels, is a Vancouver supporter of the coalition.

Share this article in your social network

Trending

Related Stories

This Week in Flyers

Article Comments

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Notice for the Postmedia Network

This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.