On 26/02/20 2:40 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:> Hi Marc,> > On 21/02/20 2:01 pm, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:>> On 2/21/20 9:31 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:>>> Hi Rob,>>>>>> On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote:>>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:>>>>> Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted>>>>> before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional>>>>> fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same.>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>>>>>> --->>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)>>>>>>>> This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend.>>>>>> Ok.>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt>>>>> index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt>>>>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode:>>>>> that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt>>>>> for details.>>>>> +>>>>> +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver.>>>>>>>> The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node.>>>>>>>>>> Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this?>>>> I'll look into the details later today.>>> > Sure. Be sure to take another look at my attempt to use the transceiver> with a phy driver some time ago.> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1006238/>