Chancellor Gordon Brown last night stood accused of hypocrisy over the scandal of
Britain's vaccine-damaged children.

The Daily Express can reveal that while Mr Brown was an Opposition MP he joined a
campaign supporting fairer compensation for youngsters who have suffered terrible
disabilities. But he is now blocking moves to introduce the scheme because the Treasury
fears it would be too costly.

The mother of one of the children he promised to help said last night that she had been
"betrayed". Caroline Forrest, whose son Scott was left severely brain-damaged by
a reaction to routine vaccinations as a baby, said: "All these years I have believed
Gordon Brown was supporting us and I was grateful. Now I have learned he is blocking any
chance of better compensation.

"It is quite disgraceful that he should behave in this way and I am planning to
write to him asking him to explain his behaviour."

Olivia Price, of the Vaccine Victims Support Network, said: "We feel as though Mr
Brown has turned his back on us after promising he would do his utmost to get compensation
for our children. It is scandalous. I say Mr Brown should put his money where his mouth
is."

The Daily Express has learned that while in opposition Mr Brown urged the Tory
government to replace the current compensation scheme which he believed was "grossly
inadequate for a lifetime of severe disability".

He called for the "few tragic and unwitting casualties" of the Department of
Health sponsored national vaccination programme to be given compensation "comparable
to that given to industrially injured people, or that awarded by the courts to those
similarly disabled".

Today, compensation awarded to people brain-damaged by medical blunders regularly runs
into millions of pounds.

Yet the most that the families of vaccine-damaged children can hope to get from the
official payment scheme is a one-off sum of £40,000. Most of the unfortunate casualties
of the vaccination programme only ever received £10,000.

Hope of proper compensation was held out by a 1978 Royal Commission report, but a
recommendation for court action to be allowed for vaccine damage has been blocked by
Labour and Conservative governments ever since - for fear that the damages would be too
costly for the Exchequer.

This month, Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker was told by the Lord Chancellor's
Department: "The Government has no plans to make changes to the liability rules that
apply to compensation claims through the courts for these cases."

That means Mr Brown has rejected the call to foot the bill for proper compensation, and
the Treasury is refusing to fund any significant and substantial increase in cash paid out
under the 1979 Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme.

Under that scheme, put in place to blunt the impact of demands for proper compensation,
families are entitled to a payment only if they can prove their son or daughter is 80 per
cent or more brain-damaged or disabled.

The rest - four out of five people who apply - get nothing at all. Round-the-clock care
for a severely disabled person costs in the region of £80,000 a year.

Other MPs who have given their support to these families include the Government's
Solicitor General Ross Cranston, Trade and Industry Secretary Stephen Byers, Defence
Secretary Geoff Hoon, Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott, Labour MP Ian Stewart, and
Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy.

Two junior ministers, Hugh Bayley at the social security department and Yvette Cooper
at health, are currently carrying out a low-level review of the limited payment scheme.
But Cabinet ministers Alistair Darling, Secretary of State for Social Security, and Health
Secretary Alan Milburn have agreed to meet representatives of a cross-party campaign
group, probably before a Commons debate on the issue next week.

The ministerial review was launched in July 1997, but its results have been delayed by
an approach made by Mr Bayley and Ms Cooper to drug companies for help in setting up a
compensation fund. The drug companies rejected that plea.

Mr Bayley told the Daily Express this week: "I know the pressure on parents is
enormous. Now that the pharmaceutical industry has made its position clear, I want to
conclude the review as soon as possible."

Mr Brown pledged his support for proper compensation for vaccine-damaged children in
1986 after being contacted by Mrs Forrest, one of his Dunfermline East constituents.

Her son Scott was left severely brain-damaged by the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping
cough vaccinations he received as a baby.

Today Scott is 30. He cannot sit up unaided, talk or feed himself and is doubly
incontinent.

The family received just £10,000 from the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme in 1980. When
Mrs Forrest, 54, contacted Mr Brown asking for his support she wasn't sure what his
reaction would be.

But she was pleasantly surprised when he sent a reply supporting her and signed an
early day motion for proper compensation for vaccine- damaged children.

"I was very happy," said Mrs Forrest. "I thought he was backing us.
Labour was in power when we accepted the original £10,000 payment in 1979. They said it
was to be an interim payment until they could figure out a proper amount of compensation.

"In the meantime, Margaret Thatcher got into government and she said it wasn't
interim, that was the compensation. Labour was siding with us at the time and we
automatically thought that when they got in they would do something to rectify the
situation. It is definitely very disappointing."

She added: "I feel that most politicians when they are not in power will say what
they think people expect should be their views.

"But when they get into power they change. I feel dreadfully disappointed. It is
like a betrayal. Many of the families who have been affected thought a Labour government
would try to put things right. We have been very badly let down."

Mrs Price, of the Vaccine Victims Support Network, said: "Politicians think they
can say anything while they are canvassing for votes in order to be elected.

"The point is that Gordon Brown has got constituents going back a long time and he
should be looking after them.

"MPs seem to reach a position and then it doesn't matter about individuals - they
get to be too big."

Allies of the Chancellor last night claimed he was "very sympathetic" to the
plight of vaccine-damaged children and denied he was blocking progress in Whitehall. They
said his signature on the 1986 early day motion should be taken as evidence to demonstrate
his support. "Gordon has taken a long-standing personal interest in this subject and
will respond to any proposals on it in that context," said one friend.

It is understood that the Department of Social Security is drawing up proposals for a
package of new money totalling between £15million and £20million to help the parents of
vaccine-damaged children.

But that would be many millions short of the amount they would be entitled to were they
allowed to claim compensation through the courts.

These jabs have sentenced my son to life as a baby

SCOTT Forrest has been frozen in time since he had the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping
cough vaccinations as a baby.

Although he is now 30 he cannot sit up unaided, he can't talk or feed himself and he is
doubly incontinent. His mother Caroline first realised something was wrong with her
perfectly healthy son after the first vaccination when he was four months old.

"He was delirious, screaming and very hot. I got the doctor out and he didn't even
examine him. He said there was a flu epidemic around and that's what it was," said
Caroline.

"After the second vaccination, when he must have been 10 months old, that is when
I really noticed the difference.

"His arms and the top half of his body just jack-knifed. He wouldn't stop
screaming and then later the seizures started to develop."

A tribunal for the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme awarded Scott £10,000 in 1979.

Mrs Forrest, 54, from Fife, who has three other children, added: "Scott has stayed
at the same stage he was at as a baby before he had the vaccination. It is like time has
stood still for him."

Her husband Sam, 63, was forced to give up work to help care for Scott many years ago
and has recently been diagnosed with lung cancer. The family now rely on benefits to pay
for Scott's care.

"When you have such a severely, profoundly handicapped son, you can't give your
full attention to the other children," she said. "Financially it is hard and we
are living on income support. It is not what we wanted to ever do and it would be lovely
to get everything Scott needs."