In Which It Is Shown That All of Western Philosophy

Is Merely a Preamble to Winnie-the-Pooh

by John Tyerman Williams

This is a hilarious book for readers of sophisticated taste, the sort
of book that gets me laughing out loud and reading bits to innocent bystanders.
John Tyerman Williams writes the book with a completely straight-faced
tone.

Mr. Williams explains the book well in the first paragraph:
“A. N. Whitehead told us that the European philosophical tradition ‘consists
in a series of footnotes to Plato.’ And he was partly right.
All we need to do is to delete ‘Plato,’ insert ‘Winnie-the-Pooh,’
and change ‘a series of footnotes’ to ‘a series of introductions.’
This work will demonstrate beyond all reasonable doubt that the whole of
Western philosophy—including, of course, Plato himself—is best considered
as a long preparation for Winnie-the-Pooh. Philosophy since Winnie-the-Pooh
does naturally consist of footnotes to ‘that sort of Bear.’”

The amazing thing is that, although he may be keeping his tongue in
cheek, Mr. Williams does show us the principles of the philosophers clearly
(well, sometimes slightly hidden) presented in the stories of Winnie-the-Pooh.
He takes us through the ancient Greek philosophers, the Seventeenth Century
rationalists, the British empiricist tradition, the German philosophers,
and the existentialists.

Besides entertainment, this book is also a great introduction to philosophy.
Do you want to know the basic ideas of the philosophers throughout history?
This book tells you those ideas and show you how Winnie-the-Pooh expounds
on them. My sixteen-year-old son said that reading this book was
a great help in keeping straight different philosophers who turned up in
Brain Bowl questions.

It’s hard to pick out any one example without giving you the whole
chapter and the train of thought that so delightfully make the author’s
case. Here, for example, is a passage showing how Pooh demonstrates
the teachings of Kant:

“‘You never can tell with bees,’ said Winnie-the-Pooh.’ We have
previously looked at this dictum from a Cartesian point of view.
But it is also a clear reference to Kant’s basic teaching that things in
themselves (noumena) are unknowable.”

In another passage:

“However anxious we may be to avoid the charge of ethnocentrism, we
can hardly deny that Winnie-the-Pooh is a very English bear. It
is therefore natural to find him, in every sense, a stout supporter of
the British Empiricist tradition, which maintains that all statements
must be testable by experience. Here we have an excellent example
of the empirical approach in this investigation and final confirmation
of the hypothesis that the honey jar did in fact contain honey and nothing
else.”

Those who, like me, have long loved and treasured the books about
Winnie-the-Pooh will be astonished by how blinded their eyes have been.
After reading this book, I can’t help but wonder how I could have possibly,
all this time, actually believed that Pooh was a Bear of Very Little Brain,
when all along Pooh was “merely continuing the tradition of Socrates, who
constantly professed to be an ignorant enquirer.”

Still, John Tyerman Williams gives me consolation on his last page:

“As we should expect, Winnie-the-Pooh himself puts it in perspective.
He clearly foresaw the gradual emergence of his intellectual reputation
when he invented the game of Poohsticks. Rabbit saw the point when
he said, ‘They [previous Ursinian scholars] always take longer than you
think.’”

There are many of you out there who Need to buy this book. You
know who you are.