Assessing the opposition ahead of May’s crucial elections

CAPE TOWN — The real question this analysis begs is whether the main opposition parties, once riding high on ANC corruption, have enough time to re-tie their shoe-laces in time for the May elections next year. The recently done-up bootlaces of the DA, (until recently identified as the Patricia DA-tripper Party) have rendered it more fit to hit the electoral road, freeing it to hobble the ANC with fact-driven claims of incapacity and an inability to rid itself of intrinsic cadre-deployment patronage and corruption-inducing practices. Although the Zuma Voodoo Doll has been effectively removed from the battlefield by Ramaphosa, the DA’s needles remain out for the intrinsic conditions that allow corruption to flourish and the economy to tank – which the ruling party have yet to tackle effectively. The EFF on the other hand has its shoelaces whipping around its ankles, threatening to trip it up just when its populist rhetoric reaches election fever pitch. Who can forgive a party for allegedly stealing from the poorest of the poor while championing their cause? Whether the electorate will allow the ANC another chance remains to be seen. The high-level Zuptoid sleepers will surely show their hands in a shootout at a theatre near you next year. – Chris Bateman

By Mike Cohen

(Bloomberg) – As South Africa’s ruling party battles to bounce back from a succession of scandals and extend its quarter-century monopoly on power in next year’s elections, it has a key advantage: a wounded opposition.

By forcing the unpopular Jacob Zuma to stand down as president in February, the African National Congress deprived the Democratic Alliance and Economic Freedom Fighters of their biggest electoral asset. The DA has also been dogged by infighting in its Cape Town stronghold, while the EFF is facing allegations that it received funds illicitly diverted from a failed bank.

A man casts his ballot during South Africa’s local government elections in KwaMashu, north of Durban, South Africa, August 3, 2016. REUTERS/Rogan Ward

“In the current political context, many investors would probably consider a strong mandate for the ANC – in the 55 to 60 percent range – an optimal outcome,” said Anne Fruhauf, vice president at New York-based risk adviser Teneo. “The assumption being that this will help President Ramaphosa to strengthen his mandate and policy clout within the ANC and contain the EFF’s influence.”

Polls commissioned by Ipsos, the Institute of Race Relations and the ANC itself all show the party maintaining its grip on parliament, though down on the 62 percent it won in 2016.

Corruption backlash

Just two years ago, the ANC appeared at risk of losing the majority it’s held since the first multiracial elections in 1994 when its support tumbled to a record low of 54 percent in a 2016 municipal vote – a backlash against endemic corruption during Zuma’s almost nine-year rule.

The DA secured control of several big cities, while the EFF’s populist policies bolstered its support among young, urban voters disenchanted with rampant poverty and an unemployment rate that now stands at 27.5 percent, one the world’s highest.

The ANC began to claw back ground after Ramaphosa, a former labor union leader who helped negotiate an end to apartheid and led the drafting of the country’s first democratic constitution, edged out Zuma’s ex-wife and preferred successor, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, to win control of the party in December.

But the 106-year-old ANC isn’t completely out the woods. Its leadership battle caused deep and enduring divisions in its ranks and Zuma allies continue to occupy key positions in the cabinet and party, including Secretary-General Ace Magashule, limiting Ramaphosa’s room to maneuver and restore public trust.

“The clean-up that he is leading is not being taken lightly by the people in the ANC who were benefiting from corruption,” said Mpumelelo Mkhabela, a political analyst at the University of South Africa in Pretoria. “They would want to fight back.”

While the president said his mistake was inadvertent and the money would be returned, the opposition called for a judicial probe.

At the same time, the DA has been rocked by a fallout between its national leadership and former Cape Town Mayor Patricia de Lille. She was forced to resign after she was accused of interfering in a management appointment and blamed for the city obtaining a qualified audit report because two tenders were found to have been irregularly awarded.

De Lille, who denies any wrongdoing, now plans to start a new political party. That could cost the DA support in the Western Cape, the only one of the nine provinces it controls, because De Lille remains popular there particularly among fellow mixed-race residents.

The EFF has been stung by reports that it and some its top leaders received millions of rand looted from the failed VBS Mutual Bank. While the party says it has uncovered no evidence of wrongdoing by its officials, law enforcement agencies and parliament are investigating the allegations.

“All of the main parties appear to be in a state of flux, they are suffering internal divisions and some reputational damage,” said Daryl Glaser, a politics professor at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. “There are no perfect choices. For those who like Ramaphosa, I think they will wait and see and give him another chance.”