The Google translation works pretty well.The rigs are interesting. Probably one would have to ask a lot of questions about their data before buying. The TX output seems to be 4W PEP which is sufficient for an amplifier. The TX frequencies are limited to the ham bands but they offer individual adjustments. Some of us will not like rigs without knobs The quality of SDR is pretty much depending on good software in addition to the hardware. With this rig you have no chance to use any other independent software like with many computer linked hardware.

Yeah very expensive and another SDR radio with a junk transmitter with poor IMD performance.Regardless of the ham transmitter manufacturer, its the same old same old lousy TX performance.

Its is very easy too design and build a SDR transmitter that produces very little splatter or IMD. Its also very easy too design a low power PA that is clean.But this is typical what QRP companies do, they build the worlds worst PA in their QRP transmitters.

If they took leaf out of military radio producers and copied what they did they would get some respect for being innovative. Most of the low military transmitters run class A and they are very clean.Once you have a clean QRP driver it then becomes a good foundation for either building a super clean tube or FET PA.

The 1 st law of ham radio physics is that excellent receiver performance is wasted when you have substandard transmitter performances. Unfortunately all ham transmitters are sub standard.The fools are the hams who continue on the road of enlightenment demanding better receiver performance and say nothing about the poor transmitter performance. Idiocy at its best I am sorry too say.

A lot of hams dont get the joke that is being played on them by all the receiver number propagandist. While the objective of the argument was a legitimate one a decade ago, the argument holds no weight nowwhile manufacturers are still selling radios with poor keying sidebands and IMD. Even worst is the terrible ALC designs that by their nature cause excessive splatter. Who is listening ? Unfortunately nobody because hams dont understand the issues all that well and just say nothing and continue to buy the crap.

Yeah very expensive and another SDR radio with a junk transmitter with poor IMD performance.Regardless of the ham transmitter manufacturer, its the same old same old lousy TX performance.....Most of the low military transmitters run class A and they are very clean.Once you have a clean QRP driver it then becomes a good foundation for either building a super clean tube or FET PA.

I wonder if you actually know what you are talking aboutand doubt if you have ever studied and understood the specs of the Reuter.Even if you are not able to understand German you could read what the screenshots are showing:IMD3 products are 56,5dB below PEP @ 5W

Now give us an example of one single "low Military Transmitter running class A" and being"very clean" and tell us its specs regarding IMD3.

Copyright 2000-2018 eHam.net, LLC
eHam.net is a community web site for amateur (ham) radio operators around the world.
Contact the site with comments or questions.
WEBMASTER@EHAM.NETSite Privacy Statement