Trump made Putin the bait. Bite if Russia friendship?

Formally, the meeting of the presidents of Trump and Putin – a summit on neutral ground in helsinki, but in fact is Trump's visit to Putin. The initiative comes from Trump, he agreed to have long made mr Putin's proposal about the meeting at the highest level. Agreed to meet in helsinki. Scientists say that this summit was a personal initiative of the Trump, although it is better to say, it is an initiative of the Trump, because the solution of this visit was made clearly in the "Holy of holies" of the white house, and not just Trump. The fact that the us and Russia need to discuss not only the situation in "Hot spots" of the world, of which a minimum of four (it could be done at the level of foreign minister and chiefs of general staff of the parties that are done out of necessity).

The issue is globally: how to live, when Russia has regained military parity with the United States, and China and other global players on the way?
visit TrumpPutin is a reaction to the proposal of Vladimir Putin "Talk", made march 1 in his famous speech in an arena with a demonstration of the neWest Russian strategic weapons: "We didn't want to listen before, listen now. "
somewhere in america, appreciated the arguments of Putin and agreed to contain Russia could not militarily or economically, since a technological breakthrough in the arms Russia has made under the pressure of the sanctions. And was accepted Putin's proposal to "Talk" about the problems of world security, too. That is not the case only in the long-standing desire of DonaldTrump to meet with Vladimir Putin – this meeting is required both superpowers to discuss global problems of the future coexistence and not just "Hot spots" of the world who are more a background for hiding the main themes. Here you need to remember that behind Trump are his advisers former U.S. Secretary of state and one of the founders of the bilderberg henry kissinger, nobel laureate in economics joseph stiglitz, and probably many more other advisers, which we do not know.

But kissinger and stiglitz we know and imagine the circle of their interests. Therefore, we can assume that the main theme of this summit will be a global problem, we can discuss possible policy changes of parties in some areas. The current political agenda at such meetings are not solved — they are solved, if not solved, before. Global issues between the U.S.

And Russia today can be seen two: Europe, China and trade war of the USA with them. Therefore, by the way, the summit in helsinki destined for success in words and certainly signed the returns, although in reality it may not be: understanding main problems may not be achieved. However, in the security field new strategic weapons of Russia provide opportunities to minimize us missile defense bases in romania and Poland: they have lost america its relevance. That is, the us can remove these missile defense base in exchange for some limitations of the neWest Russian strategic arms. Everyone is well clear that the us is looking for ways to affect relations between Russia and China. For this, the us is able to offer its friendship or russia, or China.

Or both countries at once, and wait to see who the first will fall for her. In what may be a us proposal about the friendship of russia? it is appropriate to recall kissinger. He said in 2014 about events in Ukraine: "Putin sees this as a dress rehearsal for what we would like to do in Moscow. "
it seems, from kissinger are supposedly "Pro-russian" statements Trump, although in reality they are backed by the political realities of today's global and us interests. Failed strategy of the United States since obama, about which he said in his book: to establish american control over Russia and to create a Western outpost against China. The us is now looking for a new strategy. And Russia could be interested in, perhaps only one sentence on Ukraine, namely: the unconditional cancellation of the us's "Special operations" (which Putin) in Ukraine.

Behind the scenes Moscow may even claim damages their interests. And Trump can do it, and without great loss of face: it is enough to "See" Ukraine neo-nazi manifestations bandera and angry. And to put all the responsibility on barack obama, as he has already done in crimea. However, Trump needs to show his "Holy of holies" of some concessions in return from russia. Here may be seen Europe in light of the economic views of joseph stiglitz.

Russia may please the stiglitz and revise its energy policy in Europe in favor of the us and its shale lng, would like to share with us energy market of Europe. Moscow can do it physically, can compensate for financial losses in the asian energy markets, which means that you can go for this option. In other words, Putin may help Trump in the trade war with Europe. The obvious gifts of cnn in the form of concessions, including the Ukraine, from Trump should not wait, we are talking about changing policies. Usa – Ukraine, Russia – in Europe.

But to protect against a general policy of assaults Trump is gaining the hawks is able to peck any media if necessary. The newly acquired Trump hawk John bolton has spoken about this in the following way: they Trump well know which of them loves america.

Facebook

Twitter

Google+

Pinterest

Comments (0)

The article is based on what they have seen and meaningful by the author in various hot spots. It accumulated the experiences of soldiers who fought in Afghanistan, Georgia, Dagestan, Chechnya and participated in other local confl...

Slavyansk fighting bravely stood still until the beginning of July, and behind him, in the Donetsk and Lugansk again began negotiations for surrender of the republics. The oligarchy could not calm down and was looking for a way to...