So here we have a leech company living off the debt difficulties of others.

And guess what, Gereld Celente, that ‘Knight of the little people”, had investments in this company. So Gerald, your lovely man of the people’s image – rather like your rather questionable investment – has crumbled.

haha.

I don’t give a monkey’s if you say Farmers invest in futures. That sounds like spin to me. Don’t try and put yourself in with Farmers. Somehow, just somehow, I doubt it’s the same kind of futures your investment with MF Global involved.

You can see some footage of these alleged snipers (murderous assassins is a better description I feel) at Information Clearing House: Who Are These Snipers In Syria? (Video) These videos are said to show devastating head shots by snipers in Syria.

If you read the comments, you will see suggestions that these snipers are Israyhelli snipers. The more I think about that, the more annoyance I feel, No, not because I have any sympathy for that filthy murderous imposter of a once magnificent God fearing state (thousands of years ago), because I don’t. I want to see Israyhell wiped from the political map and those Zionist activists hung from a slowly constricting rope.

What I find annoying is something I’ve seen in “alternative view” holding people for some time now [note: it hasn’t escaped me that this could be a result of manipulation]. These people can only think in binary. They can only entertain one of two views. Anything more than that and well… meltdown.

In their minds, those Israyhelli snipers can just march into Syria and do anything they want. Of course there is no Syrians who ever have had this training. Oh no! Never. There are no forces; military/paramilitary/police that have long harassed the people. That tanks are mobilised right now against the people protesting isn’t in fact a sign that these snipers being Syrian is wholly consistent.

Stupid idiots.

Bipolarised fools in denial of a tyrannical regime trying to retain its grip onto power. Power which has seen the anti-human actions of the Israyhell pass with impunity. Syria has been struck my Israyhelli missiles a numbr of times. Syria did nothing. Assad is probably paid to do nothing. The guy’s a schmuck as some NY Jew might say.

Over the years, credible stories about Syrian collusion in the USUK’s ‘extraordinary rendition’ program, e.g. Maher Arar. Oh, but don’t let your bipolar disorder switch off here, please, label him as a CIA agent or something crap like that. Go on, deny his torture. Tell you what you enter those Syrian torture dungeons or Egyptian dungeons, or Tunisian totrure dungeons and get yourself beaten black and blue, lashed with shredded cables.he was a US plant right? Then come out (if you are lucky enough) and say it never happened.

Who is saying all this Israyhelli agents are on the streets of the Arab countries? Who knows, but it looks well connected to the ACLU. That homosexual ‘tolerance’ promoting body that strangely seems to be speaking out against most instances of USUK fascism than anyone else(good) therefore denying others a voice of opposition groups like Muslims, thereby benefiting from the bipolarisation of people minds and preventing, say, an real Islamic voice from emerging.

Clever sods, and Muslims support them like fish eating the hooked worm.

Mind you, where are the Muslim voices to challenge this homo-foisting ACLU ‘opposition’ group? It’s not like there are actually many Muslims standing up for an equal say. The Muslims are being told to and/or being encouraged by their leaders to shut the hell up and accept whatever crap ges lobbed at you.

These so called self proclaimed leaders are truly miserable. Islamic leadership has never been so utterly crap. And as for these western Imams, oh boy. An arm band float in a pool of lava would be more useful than these people. Well, maybe not. These western Imams who refuse to criticise the hideous acts of their government or these tryants in places like Tunisia, Egypt or Syria etc etc. are actually useful, but not to Muslims or Islam.

It was hilarious to hear one of them issue statements of support to the unarmed ordinary people fighting oppression on the strret of Cairo, while they cowered in the US Embassy: I propose this is used as the new definition of Islamic leadership. Leading you to…

Dear oh dear.

Yeah, this offend some people. At times, ones slumber needs a sharp slap on the face. This is it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIpiXJW3dYE
Generally, when I see a worshippers of Marx proselytising, visions of my old Student Union president appear before my eyes and is coupled with a strong feeling of wanting to say to him ‘grow up’. Zizek’s ‘thinking out of the Marx (match)box’ is refreshing, taking those bits Marxism (which by the way Marx likely rehashed cum swiped from Socrates) that are sensible but leaving off the “I ♥ marx” underpants.

It’s going to be interesting to see the atheists expressions of denial morph to horror should they ever have the aptitude to see that their own predictions of turmoil map onto eschatology, but then again, fantasy is deadly seductive.

There is certainly a case for music/movie/software companies to get payment for their goods. In that context, pirated electronic media has an element of ‘wrongness’ about it – especially if you can afford to pay a fee for its use. But this, in todays ‘commercial porn’ world – were it seems, every human action must now be accompanied by a financial transaction – is just about the only side of the story you hear.

What about the poor, why should they be denied access to this stuff – by what moral force can they be denied something (that they may find useful) simply because they don’t have money? Instead of money-making the world go around, shouldn’t morality make the world go around instead? Strongly connected to that is altruism accompanying morality.

And what about these companies who demand extortionately high prices for their goods e.g. the very pants Nightmare On Elm Street (Original) “JUST £6.99″, or companies trying to force people to essentially buy a new copy of their software (/licence) for every HDD it’s installed on or every CPU that accesses it? My opinion is if you buy the software, you are entitled to use it wherever you are, or once you’ve bought it, allow anyone you choose to use it or see it, much like your kitchen scales, or radio or padlock or whatever.

Then of course we have big companies, e.g. Micro$oft, who make newer products which have compatibility issues with older versions, e.g. Microsoft Office 2007 and 2004 {Note the .< >x ‘reader patch’ for software that only understood ‘non-x’ed’ .< > is a minimalist attempt to quell anger. The minimalism gives annoying layout differences which of course could easily be negated should the correct level of effort and sophistication be provided by the patch, but the patch HAS to be minimalist because it would otherwise have negative economic consequences on the latest version – sly sods}. Pulling the plug of ‘technical support’ on older versions of software has some effect of ‘fear-ing’ large institutions into going for the upgrade which of course then puts the squeeze on individuals to have the same upgraded system that their work place has. Having said that, it is true that things like Windows 98 has large publically available information of tweaks/bugs/patches/troubleshooting and so on, but with information spam and in effect growing phishing-like sites on the web, increasingly often good information is difficult to find.

All that sucks!

A long time ago, I purchased Netscape Navigator. A week or two after I did that, it was announced that it was to become open source – i.e. free. I cannot imagine that the decision to do this only came in period from when I bought the software up until the time they made the announcement. I felt very cheated. I seem to remember complaining but they didn’t return any money. I suspect they wouldn’t return money of anyone who bought it 3 minutes before the announcement either.

Software and media companies are a bit like pharmaceutical companies. The economic balance is WAY TOO SKEWED IN THEIR FAVOUR. So If people pirate their stuff, they shoulder some of the blame.

Why not regulate what a media/software/pharmaceutical company can charge based upon the number of people who use it? And if these companies over charge, as most of them greedily do, then allow others to tap into the otherwise protected intellectual property of the product involved. A bit like South Africa threatening to make anti-HIV drugs outside patent laws?

The near-total commercialisation of life is horrible. In that sence It gives me a certain pleasure when I hear of (poor)people using pirate software/media.

Well one of the most disgusting megalithic companies in the world (that controls much of the US’s food supply amongst other things) can pimp their GM foods into you without safety tests.

Hourray for humanity.

Monsanto GM seed ban is overturned by US Supreme Court

age last updated at 21:55 GMT, Monday, 21 June 2010 22:55 UKAlfalfa is mostly used for cattle feed The bio-tech company Monsanto can sell genetically modified seeds before safety tests on them are completed, the US Supreme Court has ruled. – source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_and_canada/10371831.stm