The legislation, introduced today with the backing of Police Chief Greg Suhr and Supervisor Mark Farrell, creates a clear timeline for permit applications and for police to notify event organizers in advance how many officers will be required for the event and how much it will cost, Campos said.

“We will be ensuring that festival organizers aren’t hit by unforeseen costs a few days before the event, thereby making it impossible to put on that event,” Campos said.

The legislation also creates a process for permit applicants to appeal decisions to the chief of police and a data collection process through the Entertainment Commission that will document the number of police officers and associated costs paid by city festivals.

Current city ordinances require festival organizers to pay for off-duty officers to provide security. Entertainment industry officials today said last-minute security cost estimates can spell “disaster” for event budgets and even lead to cancellations.

“For decades, San Francisco’s event producers have been stumbling around in the dark,” Robbie Kowal, a music producer and festival organizer said in a statement today supporting Campos’ legislation. “These guidelines turn the lights on, and will reward applicants who practice foresight, empathy, communication and timely planning.”

Suhr said he was committed to a positive working relationship with the entertainment industry and remained open to suggestions on how to improve.

“I view this legislative amendment championed by Supervisor Campos as a win on both fronts,” Suhr said today. “This legislation establishes expectations and timelines for all parties. That’s a good thing.”

Campos today said that festivals for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community alone, such as San Francisco’s annual Pride event, drew $68.9 million in spending in 2014, according to city data. That amount rose to $259 million when hotels, restaurants and local transportation were taken into account.

Sara Gaiser, Bay City News

Please make sure your comment adheres to our comment policy. If it doesn't, it may be deleted. Repeat violations may cause us to revoke your commenting privileges. No one wants that!