Whatever outreach programs are decided on by DCHAS, please include contacts with the largest teacher organization in NYC, the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) and the New York Section of the ACS.I am sure that these groups will be anxious to work with you in finding a way to prevent this from happening again.

From: DCHAS-L Discussion List [mailto:dchas-l**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU] On Behalf Of Mack PowersSent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:51 AMTo: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDUSubject: Re: [DCHAS-L] CSB statement on High School Laboratory Fire in New York City

As a high school teacher, I'll weigh in. I teach at a 4A school in rural Oklahoma. I teach almost all of the chemistry at our school. My networking with other teachers across the state indicates that yes more chemistry teachers are alligned with NSTA than ACS. Even more are not affiliated with anything.

The week before break one of my classes complained that we never do "cool labs" so I showed them the CSB video. That made them think about labs differently. I teach the same concept using splints. Not as "cool" but just as educationally effective while much safer.

ACS will not reach many teachers by holding seminars espescially if we teachers have to pay for it. And funding is so tight most of us are buying supplies like pens and notebooks out of our own pockets. Try working through the state departments of education. Each state has a science curriculum director. They are all pretty swamped right now with core and testing but an appeal for the safety of our students should be heard.

I would also consider engaging the NSTA, or at least reach out to this organization as we pursue this project. I suspect that many science teachers have a stronger affinity to that organization than to the ACS and we should seek partners that have street credibility with teachers. I'm speculating here; if anyone (such as some high school chemistry teachers reading this?) please weigh in.

If we really want to serve the high school teaching community (and I take that to be the primary motivating here, of course) I'd suggest that we offer workshops for free instead of some per person charge. Many, but perhaps not all, school systems are having budgets slashed in recent years. (And, I'd expect that many teachers would not attend such a workshop unless they get a stipend for attending. Thus, any charge on our part requires "double payment" by a school system.) I'd wager that the amount of money this effort would recover is a tiny, tiny fraction of the ACS budget, and/or corporate sponsorship seems possible. Whether the presenters are volunteers or get paid a nominal stipend is worth discussing; I'd favor the latter.

And: Lots rural and small school systems only have one chemistry teacher. How to reach out to them would be problematic. I mention this only as something to think about, not as a criticism of the main idea. And, surely it is better to have a program that works for some (but not all) rather than trying to design an impossible structure that can effectively reach everyone.

1. Work with Diane and Bill to hold a subject conference on the issue. Attendees should be ACS, CSB, and appropriate K-12 educational leaders and associations2. Develop and offer a 2- 3 workshop on doing HS demonstrations. ACS should offer this to any school districts that want it for a nominal fee - maybe $50 per person. If CCS puts it together as a solid package, we can draw on local CHAS members - and others from ACS - to present it to the school district.

I am afraid that ACS will be embarrassed professionally if the public starts asking why ACS is not doing something about this. This entire initiative will draw on resources we already have and will not be overly expensive.

When I read about this yesterday this was exactly my reaction. It sounds like the same experiment that uses methanol and the demonstrators are just unaware about the conditions that cause fires or they just underestimate the risk of the fire and explosion and don't provide proper protections for their students. I am wondering if CCS should issue some sort of warning about this particular demonstration in high schools - not so to stop the demonstration but rather to explain the risks associated with this and suggestions for steps to prevent these incidents. What do you think? Bob

-----Original Message----->From: "Secretary, ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety" <secretary**At_Symbol_Here**DCHAS.ORG>>Sent: Jan 4, 2014 9:29 AM>To: DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**MED.CORNELL.EDU>Subject: [DCHAS-L] CSB statement on High School Laboratory Fire in New York City>>Statement from CSB Chairperson Rafael Moure-Eraso on Yesterday's High School Laboratory Fire in New York City>>I was distressed to learn once again of a serious high school laboratory accident, this one occurring yesterday at a New York City High School. According to media reports, a flash fire occurred during a demonstration in the high school's laboratory resulting in injuries to two 10th grade students, one severely.>>This accident is all too similar to the one we highlighted in a recent video safety message released by the CSB that specifically focused on potential dangers in high school chemistry laboratories. The CSB&rsquo;s safety message entitled "After the Rainbow," features accident survivor Calais Weber in her own words describing how at age 15 she was burned over 40 per cent of her body during a chemistry demonstration performed by her teacher at a prestigious boarding school she attended in Ohio. That accident occurred on January 23, 2006. Our chemical investigation screening process regrettably regularly reports similar accidents.>>Though information at this stage is very preliminary, media reports indicate the accident that occurred yesterday in Manhattan may have been similar to the type of demonstration that critically injured Ms. Weber in that it attempted to show how chemicals react in different ways giving off different colors. .. The demonstration in the CSB video showed the use of highly flammable methanol to depict how various mineral salts produce different color flames when burned.>>The CSB believes that accidents in high school laboratories occur with alarming frequency. Yesterday&rsquo;s incident is yet another example of a preventable incident and a reminder of the need for exacting safety measures to protect students and school property. As Calais states in the safety message, her accident should never have occurred, and that with better attention to good safety practices, similar accidents can also be avoided. She says, "It feels with this type of injury that you&rsquo;ve had so much taken away from you unnecessarily and to keep reading about other people who have had very similar experiences, it&rsquo;s tragic and shouldn't happen."

The content of this page reflects the personal opinion(s) of the author(s) only, not the American Chemical Society, ILPI, Safety Emporium, or any other party. Use of any information on this page is at the reader's own risk. Unauthorized reproduction of these materials is prohibited. Send questions/comments about the archive to secretary@dchas.org.The maintenance and hosting of the DCHAS-L archive is provided through the generous support of Safety Emporium.