Yes, you read that title correctly. According to the Associated Press, the Obama administration is close to changing course on Syria and supporting the removal of Bashar Assad from power.

The decision has not yet been made — and this is likely a calculated leak meant to deliver a last warning to Assad — but this is nonetheless a huge change in policy. An official has told the AP: “we are getting close” to demanding the Syrian dictator’s resignation. Apparently the language is already being crafted, with the report stating: “The first step would be to say for the first time that President Bashar Assad has forfeited his legitimacy to rule.” This will be coupled with language supporting a transition towards democracy — a softer way of saying two words the Obama administration is so reluctant to utter: “regime change.”

Earlier this month, the French foreign minister publicly predicted Assad would fall if his regime continued its methods: “If the regime perseveres down this path, it will fall one day or another, but it will fall.” An advisor to President Sarkozy also said: “The crimes of the Syrian regime are on the same level as the crimes in Libya.”

The Israeli defense minister contradicted reports that Israel fears the fall of Assad, saying: “I don’t think Israel should be alarmed by the possibility of Assad being replaced,” and that he is “approaching the moment in which he will lose his authority … the more people are killed, the less chance Assad has to come out of it.” Israeli President Peres said in April: “I believe finally that a democratic system in Syria is our best bet for the future.”

This change may be partly due to Secretary of Defense Gates, who boldly said: “The Egyptian army stood on the sidelines and allowed people to demonstrate and in fact empowered a revolution. The Syrians might take a lesson from that.” Senator John Kerry, who has met with Assad, now says attempts to engage Assad must now come to an end. “The chance was lost and that’s the end of it,” he said.

Only this January, Ambassador Robert Ford arrived in Damascus hoping to initiate a new era in Syrian-American relations. As the uprising began and innocents were slaughtered in the streets, the U.S. was slow to react and offered only condemnations of human rights abuses without any substantive change in policy. Secretary of State Clinton even said on March 27: “Many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe he’s a reformer.”

Now, the State Department spokesman is saying the “window is narrowing” and the condemnations on the Syrian regime have gotten harsher. The administration is also wisely pointing out the Iranian hand involved in the oppression. The White House has said it is working with the international community to respond to the violence. The U.S. has sanctioned three senior officials — which is a small but significant start — and is seeking access to a detained Al-Jazeera reporter covering the revolution.

The European Union has imposed an arms embargo and sanctioned 14 officials, leaving Assad out for the time being in the hopes the threat will change his behavior. The UN Human Rights Council approved a U.S.-sponsored resolution condemning the Syrian government and will investigate the brutal suppression, potentially paving the way for indictments. The UN also tried to deploy a humanitarian team to Dara’a that was denied access by the regime on May 10, and the UN Development Program has suspended operations in Syria.

At the same time, the International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that the site destroyed in September 2007 — in an operation everyone attributes to Israel — was indeed a secret nuclear reactor. Syria is still refusing to grant access to other sites suspected of being part of a covert nuclear weapons program. The IAEA’s report is due next month, adding another layer of pressure on the Assad regime. And all of this is happening as the UN Special Tribunal investigating the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri has prepared indictments for Hezbollah officials and quite possibly Syrian officials.

The pieces are falling together for tough international action against the Assad regime at precisely the time it is most vulnerable.

It is imperative that the West move fast, as the Interior Ministry has given protesters until May 15 to turn themselves in.

Senator Joe Lieberman has offered multiple good suggestions on how the U.S. can support regime change in Syria. There should be more sanctions on Syrian officials, including Assad himself, and those overseeing the violence should be publicly warned that they face prosecution through the International Criminal Court. An international coalition should deliver humanitarian aid to the cities under siege and equipment to help restore severed communications from the information blockade.

Congress should immediately propose a bill similar to one just introduced designed to support the Iranian opposition. It forbids any company from selling equipment that can be used for repression, from batons to internet filtering software, and threatens them with sanctions. Additional measures can also be taken, including pushing for sanctions for Syria’s lack of cooperation with the IAEA, and pressing the UN Special Tribunal to release its indictments. American and European officials should meet with Syrian dissidents that are secular liberals and calling for their release, especially those from the Allawite minority that the Assad regime draws its ranks from.

If Mubarak and Gaddafi deserved to fall, then Assad — who has the blood of American soldiers on his hands and is a major support of terrorism — certainly does as well.

According to the Tehran Bureau at PBS Dorothy Parvaz has been deported to Iran (so she can die of head trauma like the last poor Canadian/Persian reporter).

Everyone was worried that Obama was a pacifist. We are going to end up head to head with the Iranians over Syria. Are we ready for that? He is turning into Wilson whom he likes to believe he emulates. Too damn weak to have a position so he and we are pulled into a giant freaking conflict that will turn into global warfare.

Iran and China and Russia are best buds. barring that, they won’t mind sitting back while we get bloody and they take what’s left.

Can we really afford to lose our “partner for peace” in solving the most important conflict in the Middle East? Aren’t we forgetting that the Zionists are behind all the troubles in the region?

Can’t wait to see posters of Assad with Jewish stars drawn on his forehead. As in Egypt and Libya, the Arab Spring has exposed another pawn of the Jews. Oh Allah, will the betrayal of the Arabs never cease?

When will Obama and Gates admit this is exactly the Neocon’s plan enfolding? This is a once in 1300 year opportunity for peace and prosperity for billions of miserable people and Obama withdrew all support of democracy in the ME upon inauguration.

We should simply drop a bomb on Assad and send in the same experts who set up Chile.

“moving toward a decision”
Translation: “A few more rounds of golf, a game of pick-up or two and several celebrity dinners and I’ll be ready to announce that I have formed a committee to STUDY the situation.”

When Assad is gone the Christians in Syria will be persecuted and driven out. They still speak Aramaic in some places and have been there for almost two thousand years. There’s probably a biblical prophecy that will be fulfilled when that happens.

Yes! With all the criticism of the Bush administration regarding the fact that WOMD were never found in Iraq, I always wondered if anyone at all had paid attention to the fact that tons of materiel were trucked across the border into Syria in the months before the war. Want to guess what was included? It wouldn’t surprise me if Syria’s relations with NK nuclear advisors began shortly after importing technology from Saddam; why not chemical weapons, etc. as well?

Sorry, that should have read “WMD”, but hopefully my typo won’t offend too many. Still think the Bush admin got the short end of the stick on that issue – “lied to the American people” indeed. Remember all the print and talk time wasted on that, as though it were a conspiracy?

Here’s what’s going to happen. Iraq will succeed. Iran and Syria will undergo regime change due to the rot endemic to their systems. The info that will become available as a result will fully vindicate the Bush admin aka “neocon” view of ME politics. The Obama admin will then take credit for any positive developments.

Besides weak Jordania there are three strong influentional Israel`s neighbours:
Egypt with 1 mlllion strong army,Syria,controlling Lebanon with Hisballah`s tens of thousands of rockets,Syria being controlled by Iran,busy with his Bomb.
Is it strange that Obama tried to make friends with Israel`s enemies-Lebanon,Syria,Iran till the last moment,while the loyal Mubarak was thrown out by the president at once?
I think the answer is simple: Obama search the pressure lever for his ally!