five rules for intellectuals

Not that we pay any attention to rules in the first place, but we’ve got to start with some kind of thesis statement before we can argue about it, right?

So here are five pieces of advice for intellectuals from steve fuller‘s book the intellectual, and yes, the lowercase is his, or at least his publisher’s. All true intellectuals respect one another’s case preferences.

First, learn to see things from multiple points of view without losing your ability to evaluate them. Always imagine that at some point you will need to make a decision about what to believe of these different perspectives.

Second, be willing and able to convey any thought in any medium. There would be little point in being an intellectual if you did not believe that ideas, in some sense, always transcend their mode of communication.

Third, never regard a point of view as completely false or beneath contempt. There is plenty of truth and error to go around, and you can never really be sure which is which.

Fourth, always see your opinion as counterbalancing, rather than reinforcing, someone else’s opinion.

Fifth, in public debate fight for the truth tenaciously but concede error graciously.

Now, these seem like pretty sensible guidelines overall (although I hope we won’t see dancing about architecture any time soon) but he loses me and all other absolutists on #3, not that I expect it would bother him. What, you have to wonder, is the point of discussing ideas or attempting to determine truth if one ultimately doesn’t believe it is knowable? While it’s surely a good idea to develop the ability to argue effectively with anyone, no matter how moronic (an ability which, you may have noticed, escapes me utterly) it should never be believed that there is no reason to believe one idea rather than another; the last man who went that far was Beckett, and while he may indeed have been right, I fervently hope not. And, of course, if you are a #3-ist, you cannot disagree with me without rendering your own opposition absurd.

But then, we already know that if you disagree with me you are, by definition, absurd. I await your comments…

I find it difficult to muster enough energy or passion the energy to argue with anyone about most things. However, there are times that I do wish to take a stand and make an effective argument in favour of my own point of view. The points you have presented are excellent guidelines and I will be bookmarking them for future use. Thank you.

Number three basically means for you to keep your mind open to every and all(or as many as you can possibly absorb, comprehend) things. Truth is a constantly evolving element, do not forget that you need to evolve along with it…

See, now, that’s where we disagree. To me, truth is an eternal value, and things which are true in the past will be true in the future: it is not context-dependent. Relativism can tempt one to believe that because knowledge can never be absolute, truth is not absolute, but this is not the case. It’s simply that we can never know 100%, not that something can never be 100% wrong or right.

Recent Comments

book me as a speaker!

Have netbook, will travel. Book one of Canada's most experienced social media stewards as a speaker at your next meeting or retreat, or contact me to arrange a media appearance. Learn the world of social media from an internationally recognized authority with a street-smart presentation style like no other!