My own thoughts? Writing on the Internet while not disclosing who you really are is extremely risky behavior. If I found out one of my employees was doing that it’d really piss me off. John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, for instance, posted lots of stuff anonymously and I believe he should be fired for doing so.

I will say that the guy who wrote the Fake Steve Jobs’ blog is a brilliant writer. He always made me laugh, even when attacking me personally. I just would never counsel my friends to do such a blog. It’s a very bad idea to do one in an industry that’s getting smaller and smaller every day and that relies on personal relationships so much.

By the way, congrats to the New York Times who wrote well about both of these “fakesters.” It’s real interesting that such stories are broken by journalists, not bloggers. Of course I sorta didn’t want to know who Fake Steve was. Now everytime I deal with someone from Forbes I’m gonna be thinking of Daniel. Sigh.

Published by

Robert Scoble

As Startup Liaison for Rackspace, the Open Cloud Computing Company, Scoble travels the world looking for what's happening on the bleeding edge of technology for Rackspace's startup program. He's interviewed thousands of executives and technology innovators and reports what he learns in books ("The Age of Context," a book coauthored with Forbes author Shel Israel, has been released at http://amzn.to/AgeOfContext ), YouTube, and many social media sites where he's followed by millions of people. Best place to watch me is on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/RobertScoble
View all posts by Robert Scoble

Comments

Why do you say “was?” He’s STILL a brilliant writer, and I’ll read FSJ no matter where it’s hosted.

I’ve already seen a number of posts dissecting Daniel’s writings. He blasted Newsweek but said little about Forbes. Well, Duh! Didn’t everyone know there was a human being behind that writing, and that we’d eventually find out who it is and (surprise!) FSJ would have the same opinions? Daniel didn’t even try hard to hide himself.

As for publishing anonymously, FSJ could never have happened without it, and that’s proof enough (if any were needed) that it can be a very useful technique. (Hey, it worked for The Federalist Papers.) Forget the anonymity for a moment, FSJ doesn’t take off unless the writing kicks ass. How many people know or care about all the other “fake” sites?

In this day and age we’re all too quick to kill the messenger and ignore the message. In FSJ’s case it was only the MESSAGE we discussed. That was a very good thing. Now that he’s been unmasked some “messenger killing” has already begun by those with, in my opinion, very small minds. We’ll see a lot more of it in the days to come (there are a lot of small minds out there).

Why do you say “was?” He’s STILL a brilliant writer, and I’ll read FSJ no matter where it’s hosted.

I’ve already seen a number of posts dissecting Daniel’s writings. He blasted Newsweek but said little about Forbes. Well, Duh! Didn’t everyone know there was a human being behind that writing, and that we’d eventually find out who it is and (surprise!) FSJ would have the same opinions? Daniel didn’t even try hard to hide himself.

As for publishing anonymously, FSJ could never have happened without it, and that’s proof enough (if any were needed) that it can be a very useful technique. (Hey, it worked for The Federalist Papers.) Forget the anonymity for a moment, FSJ doesn’t take off unless the writing kicks ass. How many people know or care about all the other “fake” sites?

In this day and age we’re all too quick to kill the messenger and ignore the message. In FSJ’s case it was only the MESSAGE we discussed. That was a very good thing. Now that he’s been unmasked some “messenger killing” has already begun by those with, in my opinion, very small minds. We’ll see a lot more of it in the days to come (there are a lot of small minds out there).

I disagree. Anonymity kept us talking about the writing and avoided the ad hominem attacks so common nowadays, but it provided nothing to the writing itself. That can go on.

In the blog posts I’ve seen in the few hours since the story broke there’s primarily cynicism. Heck, Groklaw says he’s a Microsoft shill! How sad, and I don’t think it reflects well upon bloggers at all.

Maybe this cynicism is why it took an “old school” journalist to create something like FSJ in the first place.

As for looking over your shoulder, there is no indication that Daniel did that. The fact is he didn’t even try hard to keep it a secret. It remained so because few people tried to identify him, and Valleywag is little more than the Keystone Cops. But when an “old school” publication decided to bust the guy, it took about a week.

I disagree. Anonymity kept us talking about the writing and avoided the ad hominem attacks so common nowadays, but it provided nothing to the writing itself. That can go on.

In the blog posts I’ve seen in the few hours since the story broke there’s primarily cynicism. Heck, Groklaw says he’s a Microsoft shill! How sad, and I don’t think it reflects well upon bloggers at all.

Maybe this cynicism is why it took an “old school” journalist to create something like FSJ in the first place.

As for looking over your shoulder, there is no indication that Daniel did that. The fact is he didn’t even try hard to keep it a secret. It remained so because few people tried to identify him, and Valleywag is little more than the Keystone Cops. But when an “old school” publication decided to bust the guy, it took about a week.

I think if it’s serious posting like the Whole Foods guy, I agree with you. In the case of FSJ, I don’t. But, he did run the risk of being in trouble with his bosses, doesn’t sound like he is though. But, it was brilliant writing and he just got Forbes a bunch of publicity and since they’re going to host it, they’ll get more if he can still pull it off after being outed.

I think if it’s serious posting like the Whole Foods guy, I agree with you. In the case of FSJ, I don’t. But, he did run the risk of being in trouble with his bosses, doesn’t sound like he is though. But, it was brilliant writing and he just got Forbes a bunch of publicity and since they’re going to host it, they’ll get more if he can still pull it off after being outed.

Even if it works out in FSJ’s case, it still is extremely risky behavior. Keep in mind what I mean by “risky.” Gambling is “risky.” You might win a ton of money. On the other hand you might lose it all, too.

Even if it works out in FSJ’s case, it still is extremely risky behavior. Keep in mind what I mean by “risky.” Gambling is “risky.” You might win a ton of money. On the other hand you might lose it all, too.

Fake Steve Jobs admitted he has been busted in his post Damn, I am so busted, yo. If you have been living under a rock, The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs is a great satire of the daily life of Steve Jobs. It contains daily posts on trivial things that mi…

Thomas Hawk is not anonymous. I know his real name. So does anyone who really wants to know who he is. Just call him up and ask him. He also shows up at many events and is even on my videos. That’s a long way from someone like Mini or FSJ. Well, actually, now that FSJ is out of the closet he’s clean like Thomas is.

Thomas Hawk is not anonymous. I know his real name. So does anyone who really wants to know who he is. Just call him up and ask him. He also shows up at many events and is even on my videos. That’s a long way from someone like Mini or FSJ. Well, actually, now that FSJ is out of the closet he’s clean like Thomas is.

Anonymity cuts both ways. It has been used to hide the sources of disinformation and personal attacks too. In the end, the value of anonymous writing is the value of the writing itself, which is the point that was being made. I don’t see anonymity as a virtue or a vice, just a tool that appears to have been used constructively in this case.

I haven’t read the article yet, were his bosses unaware of his activity?

Anonymity cuts both ways. It has been used to hide the sources of disinformation and personal attacks too. In the end, the value of anonymous writing is the value of the writing itself, which is the point that was being made. I don’t see anonymity as a virtue or a vice, just a tool that appears to have been used constructively in this case.

I haven’t read the article yet, were his bosses unaware of his activity?

An article tells that when Forbes actually published their own article asking for tips, etc. on who FSJ was, Lyons felt bad so he immediately confessed to his boss and others. He said they took it well and were cool with it.

An article tells that when Forbes actually published their own article asking for tips, etc. on who FSJ was, Lyons felt bad so he immediately confessed to his boss and others. He said they took it well and were cool with it.

@12 You’re not sure? God, man! Do you ever read beyond first few sentences of blog posts in your Google Reader? Daniel himself said he told his bosses once Forbes began offering bounties for anyone who discovered the identity. So Forbes knew well before anyone else did. In fact they had planned to move the blog to Forbes.com in Sept. Those plans were being discussed well before this story came out. Jesus, man! Read more than the first sentence of a story!

@12 You’re not sure? God, man! Do you ever read beyond first few sentences of blog posts in your Google Reader? Daniel himself said he told his bosses once Forbes began offering bounties for anyone who discovered the identity. So Forbes knew well before anyone else did. In fact they had planned to move the blog to Forbes.com in Sept. Those plans were being discussed well before this story came out. Jesus, man! Read more than the first sentence of a story!

Do you remember when Da Ali G show first started in early 2003? Some of the guests didn’t know it was fake. They thought he was a real “journalist” from England. It was so funny – I recall sitting in my apartment on 50th between 8th and 9th in NYC, laughing uncontrolably.

Then – eventually – people caught on. And Ali G was still funny, but not quite as much b/c the guests gamed it.

Then – Sacha Baron Cohen did the same thing with Borat and real people (vs. celebrities and statesmen/women).

And it was funny, till people got mad. But.. many still laughed b/c some of it was funny.

I’m going to keep reading Fake Steve Jobs because the parody is wonderful. And I’m not going to focus much on the person behind it b/c it’s a character, a brand and just entertainment! We’ll see if it gets less funny…now that we all know.. but I hope not.

Do you remember when Da Ali G show first started in early 2003? Some of the guests didn’t know it was fake. They thought he was a real “journalist” from England. It was so funny – I recall sitting in my apartment on 50th between 8th and 9th in NYC, laughing uncontrolably.

Then – eventually – people caught on. And Ali G was still funny, but not quite as much b/c the guests gamed it.

Then – Sacha Baron Cohen did the same thing with Borat and real people (vs. celebrities and statesmen/women).

And it was funny, till people got mad. But.. many still laughed b/c some of it was funny.

I’m going to keep reading Fake Steve Jobs because the parody is wonderful. And I’m not going to focus much on the person behind it b/c it’s a character, a brand and just entertainment! We’ll see if it gets less funny…now that we all know.. but I hope not.

Robert, I think I am going to read FSJ just because he is simply hilarious and also that he’s become a habit.

Yes, I do get bored of it sometimes, but I get bored of you too and other bloggers like Dave Winer – I simply stopped visiting Amit Agarwal’s blog (the guy from Agra, India) because of his cheap, linkbait blogging and discovering I was doing nothing but wasting my time and making money for him by visiting his blog – but eventually find myself coming back to read you raving about Facebook or promoting Cocomment innovatively.

Yes, with FSJ, there was an intrique factor but seriously I wasn’t waiting for FSJ to be unmasked. He was making me giggle from the gut once in a while. Can you beat his top class labeling like Beastmaster, Squirrel Boy, Freetards etc?

The fact that he was a “writer” and not a blogger was so apparent from the beginning. Bloggers waste too much time thinking about internet as a world of links and not people, and how to make money from this medium that they largely fail to worry about the most important thing – “blogging is writing (expressing) too” and how well you express determines your readership after a time.

Robert, I think I am going to read FSJ just because he is simply hilarious and also that he’s become a habit.

Yes, I do get bored of it sometimes, but I get bored of you too and other bloggers like Dave Winer – I simply stopped visiting Amit Agarwal’s blog (the guy from Agra, India) because of his cheap, linkbait blogging and discovering I was doing nothing but wasting my time and making money for him by visiting his blog – but eventually find myself coming back to read you raving about Facebook or promoting Cocomment innovatively.

Yes, with FSJ, there was an intrique factor but seriously I wasn’t waiting for FSJ to be unmasked. He was making me giggle from the gut once in a while. Can you beat his top class labeling like Beastmaster, Squirrel Boy, Freetards etc?

The fact that he was a “writer” and not a blogger was so apparent from the beginning. Bloggers waste too much time thinking about internet as a world of links and not people, and how to make money from this medium that they largely fail to worry about the most important thing – “blogging is writing (expressing) too” and how well you express determines your readership after a time.