I have written a series of article on who and what the "skeptics"
(pseudo-skeptics) actually
are. The articles are not flattering, for there is nothing good about the
skeptic organization. Hence, there is nothing good about individual
skeptics.

Nothing at all. They are all about "hate."

The best example of the reality of the skeptics is the one explained in
my
The "Skeptics" Are An Organized "Hate Group"... article about their October
2012 campaign to stop the Australian Vaccination Network and its leader Meryl
Dorey. You can read the whole article by clicking on the article title (in
red) above. See an excerpt, below, of my article, on what they did:

"The
rape, mutilation and death threats against Meryl Dorey, President of the
Australian Vaccination Network. (AVN) make a very clear statement about the
reality of the international "skeptic"
organization. The activities of Australian Skeptics, with their Stop the AVN
subsidiary attacks, took the lid of off their formally secret plans.

Tracing the
Die in a Fire” and “Just
burn” phone calls back to top Australian skeptic leader, shoe
salesman Daniel Rafaelle, the Stop the AVN head's home telephone, brought
everything out into the open. Remember, the Australian Skeptics, at their own
"Amazing meeting" in 2010, gave Rafaelle their Top Award for his activities
against Meryl Dorey and the AVN.

Nice people, huh?

History...

The skeptic organization has been around for quite awhile. But, for
most of its history it was just a bunch of ne'er-do-wells whining together over
their common rejection by society.

But, for the last several years the skeptics have supplanted the original
group calling itself the "quackbusters,"
since the demise of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF).
And, they have found significant, mostly secret, funding sources.

The important thing to know about the skeptics in 2012 is their efforts to
control the search engine placement of certain kinds of articles; health care
and other things that interest them, and their control of those same subjects on
Wikipedia. They receive
training, and are networked, for this activity at organized meetings.

The articles on the right will give you a very clear picture of how the
skeptics operate. Click on the title to go to the actual article.

In short...

The so-called "skeptics" are a misinformation campaign run by angry male
homosexuals masquerading as atheists whose management has a significant
interest in pedophilia, its promotion and protection. They have replaced
the old "quackbuster" operation.

Lower level "skeptics," I believe, are recruited young homosexual men, who as
female skeptic Dawn Z, after refusing to attend the biggest "skeptic" annual
meeting "The Amazing Meeting" this year in Las Vegas, said:

"Unfortunately it
seems atheism (skepticism) has drawn many trashy young men with poor and limited
social skills who are plain haters any which way you talk to them. I hope its
fair to assume smart polite atheist have a non virtual life and wouldn’t run
rude post betraying intelligence 24/7. The typical stats on these bullies
making atheism look bad is American male, 21 years of age, living in parents
attic, few if any real friends and limited social interactions or connections
off of the Internet, living in the South. They put woman like me off from
participating or taking part."

Skeptic work is little more than employment of young homosexual men whose
anger, self-loathing, and bitterness at the Judeo/Christian world and its
handling of homosexuality issues normally makes them virtually unemployable in
society. So, they have available time - and a computer. They are taught to
use that time to focus their self-loathing outward, Using anonymity,
lashing out viciously at those targets they are organized to attack, by "Skeptic
Central" on the internet.

Not truly skeptics, but pseudo-skeptics. Not truly atheists, but anti
Judeo/Christian ethic. Easily manipulated by the management and funders of
"Skeptic Central."

Skeptic Central...

James.
D. J Grothe. and the James Randi
Educational Foundation sued in Federal
Court over "Bogus Million Dollar
Challenge."

There are TWO main "skeptic" organizations - the
James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) and the
Center For Inquiry (CFI). Both are well funded
from secret sources.

JREF reported, in 2010, a total income of $999,971.00
and a Total Asset claim of $1,736,101. Click
here to see the available JREF Income Tax Form 990.

Just so we all understand exactly who, and what, James
Randi is, listen, perhaps once again, to the audio tape,
here, of James Randi soliciting sex
from a young boy, and all will be
revealed to you.

The Center For Inquiry, Inc (CFI), based in Amherst, New
York shows on their Form 990 that they took in $5,242,304 in Total 2009
Income, and they had, that year, Total Assets of $3,017,144. Their
Schedule B ANONYMOUS contributions totaled $2,318,652.

More, CFI claimed that they received, in 2009, in
addition to their anonymous contributions, a so-called "Management Fee Income"
of $2,458,156. What do you suppose they managed? And who paid them to manage
it? Maybe they manage Wikipedia health care articles? How about Search Engine
Optimization (SEO) bringing skeptic, including
Stephen
Barrett's, articles to the first page of Google?

All of this income, they claim on their form 990 Mission
line is for the purpose of "Held world congress and training session,
conducted seminars, and secured grant for library expansion."
Note that they never said what the "world congress" was for, what the "training
sessions" trained people to do, what the "conducted seminars" were for, nor
mentioned what "the library" was for.

More - and you are going to love this part - I found
more than one CFI non-profit corporation based at the same New York address.
I found, in addition to CFI, the "Center
For Inquiry Development Fund," and the "Center
For Inquiry Holding Corporation." You can look at sample of their Form
990's by clicking on their blue-highlighted name. In short, the Amherst, NY
operation apparently brings in about seven million dollars a year.

Below you will find much more information about CFI, its
founders, and management.

The Definition of a "quackbuster/skeptic..."

The health care system in the US is junk. Why? Because
patient care is selected, not on what is best for the patient, but what is most
profitable for the provider. The system is focused ONLY on dealing with health
issues that have a highly profitable, patented, and approved by the FDA
medication, or an equally mega-expensive surgery available for them. ALL of the
rest are virtually ignored.

All of them. For instance:

(a) In the United States alone
there are 800,000 victims of
Cerebral Palsy - and the official mantra is that "nothing can be done for
them. They should be institutionalized."

(b) There are 2,000,000 victims
of Autism
Spectrum Disorder - and the official mantra is that "nothing can be done
for them. They should be institutionalized."

(c) There are 3,400,000 victims
of Traumatic Brain Injury - and
the official mantra is that "nothing can be done for them. They should be
institutionalized."

(d) I could go on almost
endlessly leafing through the facts and figures of US health care and where it
fails: Autoimmune diseases and disorders, diabetes, stroke, heart disease,
mitochondrial disorders, and of course the heartbreak of cancer.

Why? Because our status quo system of health care has
little, or nothing, to offer these people towards resolution - and, with our
current health care thinking - never will. Because the US health care system
is profitable, there is no point - for there is no profit in resolving health
issues. And, we the people have let this happen.

It is the "quackbusters"
job to do two things: (a) discourage or make certain that no innovation is
allowed that would change this paradigm. They need to make sure that none of
these health issues are ever fixed, nor even properly addressed, especially with
health paradigms that compete for health dollars generated by drugs and surgery,
and (b) demonize those that criticize the status quo (anti-vaccinations,
fluoride, mercury amalgam, aspartame, GMO, dental root canals, etc.).

The questions that arise, of course, are: "What kind
of people would create this horror for Americans and others around the world?
Who would do this to other humans?. Are they sociopaths, psychopaths,
sub-humans with pervasive personality disorders?

Let's paint the picture...

Lets answer that question I proposed above, "What kind of people would
create this horror for Americans and others around the world? Who would do
this to other humans?. Are they sociopaths, psychopaths, sub-humans with
pervasive personality disorders?

I'm going to show you, from their own words and actions, who the "Skeptics"
(pseudo-skeptics) really are. You are not going to like what I show you.
Unfortunately what I show you is very real.

(1) I want you to take a brief look at a video on Youtube. It is of James
Randi and
Steven Novella. Novella is a close associate of Randi's, and as the
video dialogue explains, they work closely together. Novella is the head of
the New England Skeptics and they are, I believe, the center-point for the
Wikipedia and Google SEO projects. You don't have to watch the whole
video. The first few minutes will give you all you need about "the close
relationship" between these two - and, most importantly, you will be
able to recognize James Randi's voice. I will give you access to that video
in a minute.

(2) Then I want you to listen to an audio tape, one of seven I have
involving James Randi. All of these tapes circulate through the internet,
and they have been talked about for years. The Canadian news media mentions
them prominently. I have talked about them before. But here, from the
Toronto Star:

February
11, 1996, Toronto Star:"What I had hesitated to mention is that
the colorful Randi has been involved in a number of lawsuits.
Part of the evidence brought against Randi was a tape
of his telephone conversations, of explicit sexual content, with teenage
boys. Randi has at different times claimed that the tape was a hoax
made by his enemies to blackmail him, that he made the tape himself, and
that the police asked him to make it. Whichever version is true, it's
amazing indeed that such a person could be taken seriously as a scientific
adviser in an organization dedicated to denying claims of child sexual
abuse." This tape was played during a trial in which Randi was
accused by Eldon Byrd, a good friend of Uri and a former Naval Surface
Weapons Center researcher, of defamation by claiming he was known pedophile.
True or not, during the trial Byrd and his team played a tape on which Randi
was speaking to a small boy about sex and how much it would cost. Randi
claimed it was all a setup by Byrd and the boys on the tape were prank
callers. The judge wasn't so sure about that, especially because Randi
voluntarily called back one of the boys after the latter told him his money
was running out." To read the whole piece, click
here.

(3) Then I want you to watch one more video - this time,
in its entirety. A sub-group of the "skeptics" (pseudo-skeptics) calling
themselves the "Skepchicks," who it looks to be, are primarily employees of
"skeptic" organizations, host their blogs with a webmaster named "Steve"
who, I believe, is the POSTER BOY for "skepticism."

I have had a lot of experience dealing with "skeptics"
most of which hide behind anonymity. If "skeptics" could be stereotyped
"Steve" would be the mold. I have the strong impression that every
"skeptic" sub-group is made up, primarily, of "Steves," in various shapes
and colors.

And, they want to manage your children, and your
healthcare.

(4) Before you watch and listen to the recordings I want to reiterate
something important - all of the skeptic sub groups were organized and
are/were managed by Paul Kurtz and James Randi.

Like recruits like...

CSICOP (CSI) (CFI), the current "skeptic" flagship has a three million two
hundred thousand dollar ($3,200,000) annual budget - from anonymous
sources. Read carefully the text below, about
Paul Kurtz, CFI's founder..

"Prometheus Books is the leading publisher
of pseudoskeptical, materialist, secular humanist and atheist books in U.S.
According to wikipedia "Prometheus Books is a publishing
company founded in August 1969 by
Paul Kurtz, who also founded the Council for Secular Humanism and co-
founded Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. He is currently the chairman of all
three organizations. Prometheus books publishes a range of books, including
many about science, especially those of a skeptical nature"

Well, if you enter to the
website of Prometheus Books,
and see the section on "Human Sexuality", you'll see titles explicitly or
implicitly endorsing, promoting and
justifying (with pseudo-scientific and "rationalistic"
jargon) pornography, prostitution, paedophilia, sado-masochism, zoophilia,
and other sexual aberrations and pervertions. In other sections you'll see
titles supporting abortion and infanticide, or weird behaviours like
transvestism.

The original "Human Sexuality" section of
Prometheus Books catalog was edited by CSICOP/CSI
Fellow and International Academy of
Humanism Secretariat Dr. Vern Bullough, who according to wikipedia
was "a member of the editorial board of
Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia."

This pseudo-scientific and immoral journal
(Paidika) was a pro-paedophilia
journal. According to
wikipedia "Paidika: The Journal of
Paedophilia (1987–1995) was a journal published by the Stichting Paidika
Foundation. Articles drawn from it are available from a number of
pro-pedophile activist
websites. Its editor was Joseph Geraci and the editorial board included
articles by writers Frits
Bernard,
Edward
Brongersma,
Vern L.
Bullough, and D.
H. (Donald) Mader, some of whom campaigned as pro-pedophile
activists"

(2) One of the James Randi sex with young boys audio tapes
- several few minutes long, but long enough for any parent of a young child,
realizing that that youngster on the other end of that conversation could have
been theirs. This recording was from a telephone answering machine - so
there are a few unrelated messages before you get to the boy. Listen to what
the boy says about where he got Randi's phone number - the Arcade where the
children go on the boardwalk. Click
here.

(3) Listen to "Steve" tell you about his position. Take
what he says literally. Want this guy as your next-door-neighbor? The head of
your local Boy Scout Troop? Working for the local Child Protective Services?
Park Patrol? Click
here.

The Core of the skeptics...

To
understand the core of the "skeptics" you have to understand the role of Loren
Pankratz PhD in the "skeptic" scheme of things. Pankratz describes himself
as a forensic psychologist from Oregon Health Sciences University. He is a
fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) division of the Center For
Inquiry (CFI), a board member of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF),
and a board member of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF). It's that
last group that makes him really interesting.

Pankratz is joined
on the FMSF board by James Randi and a man named Ralph Underwager (you'll see
more about Underwager just below).

Pankratz has made a
career out of testifying on behalf of accused child molesters, claiming that he,
as an expert psychologist, knows that the children are lying, or that they have
"False Memory Syndrome," whatever that is. In a famous federal criminal court
case in South Dakota, Pankratz, along with another FMSF goofball Ralph
Underwager, teamed up to try to get a new trial for four extended family tribal
males who had been convicted of the sexual abuse of five adopted female
children, ages 20 months to seven years old. Underwager, according to the
court documents,
had "interviewed" the children, by himself, getting them to recant their
testimony so as to get a new trial. Pankratz had given the small children a lie
detector test, which, supposedly showed that they had lied in court the first
time. But the Federal Appeals Court didn't buy it and disqualified both
Underwager and Pankratz as expert witnesses.

The
Appeal Decision
is sickening reading. It shows a depth of depravity most people don't even want
to think could happen to children. You can read the whole document by clicking
on the blue highlighted text just above. But, if you are short of time, just
below, is ONE of the examining MD's reports on the children. I give you this so
there is NO MISTAKE here about what we are talking about:

"The trial testimony of Dr. Kaplan
and Dr. Farrell established that the children had been sexually abused. The
children described the abuse to Dr. Kaplan shortly after they were removed from
their home. The government concisely summarized some of the pertinent medical
testimony in its Post-Hearing Brief:

Dr. Kaplan testified that on
January 15, 1994, he examined [J. R.], who was four-and-a-half years old at the
time. Trial Transcript (hereinafter referred to as TT) 202. [J.R.] told Dr.
Kaplan that Uncle Jess hurt her “privates.” TT 203. While Dr. Kaplan was
completing the genital examination of [J.R.]., she told him “Uncle Jess hurt me”
and when asked where, [J.R.] pointed to her left labia. TT 205. Dr. Kaplan found
redness and signs of recent trauma, including a bruise or contusion. TT 205. As
Dr. Kaplan examined [J.R.’s] anal opening, [J.R.] said that Uncle Jess has used
his hand in her butt. TT 206. Dr. Kaplan found that his physical findings were
consistent with sexual abuse. TT 208.

Dr. Kaplan also examined [L.R.],
who was six years old at the time. [L.R.] told Dr. Kaplan to “check my peach”
because it hurt. TT 213. [L.R.] told Dr. Kaplan that her uncles hurt her. TT
213. Dr. Kaplan found a large bruise and redness on [L.R’s] labia majora on the
right side and found that [L.R’s] hymen was somewhat disrupted. TT 213. He
determined that the injury was fairly acute and had occurred within the last few
weeks. TT 214. He testified that his findings were consistent with child sexual
abuse. TT 214.

Dr. Kaplan also examined
[R.R.], who was five years old at the time. While examining [R.R’s] genitalia,
she volunteered spontaneously, “ I have a bruise where my uncle put his private
spot. TT 219. [R.R.] volunteered that her uncle Garfield did this at her
Grandma’s house. TT 219. [R.R.] also stated that her uncle put his private “in
my butt.” TT 220. Dr. Kaplan found a readily open hymen and a midline scar on
the anus at six o’clock. TT 221.

Dr. Kaplan also examined [T.R.], who was seven years old at the time. He found
obvious trauma and contusion on her inner labia majora. [T.R.] told Dr. Kaplan,
“Uncle Jesse hurt me there.” TT 224. Dr. Kaplan found [T.R’s] hymen to be
disrupted and determined that his findings were consistent with sexual abuse. TT
225.

Dr.
Farrell conducted further examinations of [R.R, T.R, F.R, L.R, and J.R.] in
February of 1994. Dr. Farrell found evidence of tearing and scarring of the anal
mucosa on [F.R.] TT 387. In examining [R.R.], Dr. Farrell found obvious damage
to the hymenal ring and a scar at six o’clock. TT 390. [R.R.] also had a tearing
at the seven o’clock position in the anal area. TT 389 [should be TT 393]. Dr.
Farrell found a fusion at the six o’clock position on [L.R.] TT 396. He also
found evidence of anal trauma at the twelve o’clock position on [L.R.] TT 398.
Dr. Farrell further noted a tag or scar on the hymen at the six o’clock position
when he examined [J.R.]. TT 399. Dr. Farrell also found that the anterior
portion of he hymenal ring was essentially gone on seven-year-old [T.R.] TT 400.

At trial, even the defendants’
medical expert, Dr. Fay, found that the injuries to [L.R., R.R., and J.R.] were
very suspicious and may have been acquired through sexual trauma. TT 1023. Dr.
Fay also found that the labial injuries to [T.R, L.R, and J.R.] were only seven
to ten days old. TT 1016.

Pankratz, it was
shown, had no idea how to conduct a polygraph examination. Underwager, Pankratz
and Randi's FMSF buddy, went on to be disqualified in a stream of cases, shown
here,
throughout America. At the time this happened these little girls were
respectively, 20 months old, four-and-a-half, six, and seven years old.

Are the "skeptics" credible?

It was Martin Luther King, in his famous "I have
a Dream" Speech that said:

"I
have a dream that my four little children will one
day live in a nation where they will not be judged
by the color of their skinbutby the content of
their character."