The Constitutional Court announced the legal
background for its decision to revoke the headscarf amendment designed to allow wearing
of the Muslim headscarf in universities.

The 20 page legal background,
which was published in the Official Gazette, stated the following:

"This regulation which is
based on covering one’s self according to one's religious principles may lead to
clashes and mutual pressures between believers and non-believers, Muslims and
non-Muslims, when religiously worn clothing are turned into political
symbols. Individuals may feel forced to wear the Muslim headscarf and this is
not compatible with the principle of freedom of religion and conscience. In a
state system where sovereignty lies with the people, formation of a relationship with a
divine will cannot be allowed.”

The Constitutional Court had revoked the
amendment following the lawsuit filed by the People’s Republican Party (CHP) and the
Democratic Left Party (DSP).

The revoked amendment had
an additional subclause added to the 42nd article of the
Constitution, which regulated the Right and Duty of Education. It said “Unless
it is stated in the laws explicitly, no person can be deprived of the right to
education. The limits of the use of this right will be defined by a law.”
(EZÖ/TB)

The Constitutional Court announced the legal background for its decision about not allowing wearing of the Muslim headscarf in universities. It stated that such a an act might lead to clashes in the society.

This website is published within the framework of "Journalism for Rights, Rights for Journalists" -dubbed as BİA3 - project implemented by the IPS Communication Foundation with the financial assistance of the Swedish International development Agency (SIDA). The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of IPS Communication Foundation and under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the EU and SIDA and IFEX.