Needless to say, when argumentation runs thin, the cuss words have to fill in.
It's horseshit btw. here too, another stereotype.. Tries using insults, fails spelling them correctly.
Bad at debating, bad at English. And you say you are/were in the military?
Scary thought..

"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."

You're officially lapped the number of times I've seen someone weaponize "I'm in the military!" in MMO-OT. In my experience, the actual military people I know here and IRL NEVER do this.

My bullshit-o-meter is going nuts.

You're thinking Stolen Valour?

'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

Don’t take it from Hillary Clinton. Don’t take it from the media. Take it, instead, from 50 leading Republicans who have all worked directly with Republican presidents or their main advisers on national security and foreign policy:

Donald Trump “would be the most reckless President in American history.”

In an unprecedented move, 50 of the nation’s leading Republican foreign policy experts issued a statement Monday denouncing their party’s nominee as singularly unfit for the office. Their language was unconditional, spelling out the many ways Trump would be a dangerous commander in chief.

“In our judgment, Mr. Trump has none of these critical qualities” required of a president, they wrote. “He is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood. He does not encourage conflicting views. He lacks self-control and acts impetuously. He cannot tolerate personal criticism. He has alarmed our closest allies with his erratic behavior. All of these are dangerous qualities in an individual who aspires to be President and Commander-in-Chief, with command of the U.S. nuclear arsenal.”

Right on cue, Trump acted impetuously, saying at a Wilmington, N.C., rally on Tuesday that “2nd Amendment people” could stop Hillary Clinton from picking judges, which many took as an incitement to violence.

Almost no one is better positioned to know what’s required of a president than the group that issued the statement. It includes former Homeland Security chiefs Michael Chertoff and Tom Ridge; Dick Cheney’s national security advisor, Eric Edelman; former CIA Director Michael Hayden; former Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte; and others who served Republican administrations, from Nixon to Bush 43.

These people are not running for office. They don’t need the limelight. They are not pundits on the sidelines who haven’t been there. These individuals have been in the national-security trenches. They know what’s required of a president, and they have no incentive to criticize Donald Trump other than out of genuine concern for the country.

That so many key players in the Republican national-security establishment feel this way raises the question of who a President Trump would have as foreign policy advisers. It would not be people with a tremendous amount of experience.

It raises another question as well: How does the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman reconcile his embrace of Trump with what these experts have to say? That would be North Carolina’s Richard Burr, who is seeking reelection and who has supported Trump’s campaign.

The signatories to the letter made clear they are not necessarily supporting Clinton. But they know what they think of Trump.

Trump “has demonstrated repeatedly that he has little understanding of America’s vital national interests, its complex diplomatic challenges, its indispensable alliances, and the democratic values on which U.S. foreign policy must be based,” they write.

We understand why people are frustrated with government, and the appeal of an outsider. But this letter is a different animal than the typical back-and-forth of politics, and should make voters consider if this is really the outsider they want.

So according to Hillary Clinton today the people who own guns can't vote only kill people. Her paranoia is concerning. Is she going to react the same way to foreign leaders?

Yeah take this to the Clinton thread.

What are we gonna do now? Taking off his turban, they said, is this man a Jew?
'Cause they're working for the clampdown
They put up a poster saying we earn more than you!
When we're working for the clampdown
We will teach our twisted speech To the young believers
We will train our blue-eyed men To be young believers

When Crooked Hillary says that she'd put coal workers out of work and attempt to chain them to the government and says that she'd put criminal invaders ahead of US citizens you don't hear a peep out of the "news" media. When Donald Trump calls upon Constitutionalists to unite behind him what he says is misinterpreted by the "news" media.

Politifact is already on the "Second Amendment" thing. You'll note in the very same paragraph, he adds three more lies about Clinton, and the article also has a Trump senior communication translator advisor spinning the comment.

- - - Updated - - -

Originally Posted by Barnabas

So according to Hillary Clinton today the people who own guns can't vote. They only kill people. Her paranoia is concerning. Is she going to react the same way to foreign leaders?

You want to link this? Because without a link, I'm just going to say "no she didn't".

Yeah, whatever. Go to AR15.com, go to general discussions, and see what other military people are saying about you. My names Jinxsters on there. In order to have a tank you have to prove by showing your DD214. I have a tank next to my name dipshit. I just come on here to see what my enemies are thinking/saying.

You certainly make the forums more entertaining. I have to agree though, I'm not sure how people can't believe you, I mean a tank next to your name and all. Maybe put a blanky round your shoulders and call it a cape and name yourself superman while you're at it.

Violence is wrong but authoritarianism and diminishing citizens rights is wrong too.

What rights are being taken away? If Hillary gets in office, NONE. But if Trump gets in office, he would appoint fascist judges that will repeal Roe V Wade and get rid of gay marriage. If you are saying that Hillary will "abolish the 2nd amendment" like Trump says, then you are fucking gullible and deserve to have your right to vote taken away.

When Crooked Hillary says that she'd put coal workers out of work and attempt to chain them to the government and says that she'd put criminal invaders ahead of US citizens you don't hear a peep out of the "news" media. When Donald Trump calls upon Constitutionalists to unite behind him what he says is misinterpreted by the "news" media.

You sound like you swallow literally everything Trump has to say.

That being said, I'm confused at to why some on the Right are so concerned about coal and manufacturing jobs. Coal is a dirty energy source and the work is still, to this day, quite hazardous. We are moving forward as a country and jobs are forming in new industries. Most business people will tell you that it is not in our interest to keep these jobs here; the US simply can't compete with cheap labor abroad.

What we should be advocating for are job training programs for a displaced workforce.

Will be even more fun when he actually wins. Will probably beat Brexit tears of "Remainers".

This latest remark "If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks... Although, Second Amendment, people, maybe there is, i don't know..." being painted as "OMG, Trump told to shoot Clinton and her judges!!! OMG!!!" ... really? Is that really what you hear? Second amendment being mentioned means you have to shoot everyone?

I am sorry you didn't get his meaning of telling gun owners to assassinate Hillary. But then again, what do you expect from a Putin apologist.

- - - Updated - - -

Originally Posted by PrimaryColor

Yes ideas like the first and second amendment are worth far more than safety. Living in a free society with hundreds of millions of people means that occasionally a small amount of people get hurt.

Funny, Trump wants to limit the First amendment, I don't see you whining like a little child about that.

I have an observation -- both about Trump's campaign as well as the MMO-C posters here.

There is a lot of talk about how the PC movement has gone out of control and we're a nation of crybabies who can't handle adversity. Blah blah safe spaces blah blah.

And yet...it seems the second they get any criticism they immediate jump to a persecution complex mentality. Isn't that the very thing they are complaining about?

Trump claims it's unfair media twisted what he says. Shouldn't the conservative response be that he needs to grow a thicker skin and own his words? Personal responsibility and all that?

And the people defending him....at worst he dog whistled for someone to shoot Clinton. At best he chose his words really poorly --- after all it's not like this mistake wasn't made before.

Given that Trump has claimed he has "all the best words" why isn't anyone just up and stating that he screwed up? You don't even hint at "second amendment solutions" in this political era. That's a known no-no.

I specifically didn't say that. I said she wants a hoop jumping circuit that amounts to coercion against gun ownership via bureaucracy.

Originally Posted by Orbitus

But if Trump gets in office, he would appoint fascist judges that will repeal Roe V Wade and get rid of gay marriage. If you are saying that Hillary will "abolish the 2nd amendment" like Trump says, then you are fucking gullible and deserve to have your right to vote taken away.

Yes Trump also has some authoritarian ideas such as banning gay marriage. I see no problem with calling out authoritarian ideas where ever they come from.