Changing policies, changing patterns of care: Danish and Swedish home care at the crossroads

Abstract

Despite pursuing the policy of ageing in place, the two Nordic countries of Denmark and Sweden have taken diverse roads in regard to the provision of formal, public tax-financed home care for older people. Whilst Sweden has cut down home care and targeted services for the most needy, Denmark has continued the generous provision of home care. This article focuses on the implication of such diverse policies for the provision and combination of formal and informal care resources for older people. Using data from Level of Living surveys (based on interviews with a total of 1,158 individuals aged 67–87 in need of practical help), the article investigates the consequences of the two policy approaches for older people of different needs and socio-economic backgrounds and evaluates how the development corresponds with ideals of universalism in the Nordic welfare model. Our findings show that in both countries tax-funded home care is used across social groups but targeting of resources at the most needy in Sweden creates other inequalities: Older people with shorter education are left with no one to resort to but the family, whilst those with higher education purchase help from market providers. Not only does this leave some older people more at risk, it also questions the degree of de-familialisation which is otherwise often proclaimed to be a main characteristic of the Nordic welfare model.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Minna Zechner, Gun-Britt Trydegård, Lina van Aerschot and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on an early version of this article.

References

Anttonen A (1998) The welfare state and social citizenship. In: Kauppinen K, Gordon T (eds) Unresolved dilemmas. Women, work and family in the United States, Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 9–32Google Scholar