Just a theory.. The sun could, objectively, be looked at as organism, or cell. Could there be a slow splitting process happening? One in which a
smaller sun is spawned and fed (for a time) by said parent, sol? Perhaps we cannot always see this? Just s theory. Which I don't want to be
attacked for presenting. Thank you.

Originally posted by WanderingThe3rd
It even has different coloured rings too it, are you guys blind rofls, let me go photoshop it for some of you, sheesh

and what? someone said something on the lense? ok sure bud, thats why its the exact same thing in that video from last year but now in a different
spot? it also looks like its shiney, reflecting like, has some gloss too it.

the more i look at it, the more dull i think you guys are that are denying it

edit on 23-3-2012 by WanderingThe3rd because: (no reason
given)

Troll much?

The position of this fiber on the detector is fixed, and always shows up in the same position in the raw images. However, the processed images on
the website include a correction for the spacecraft roll angle so that solar north always points straight up. This causes the position of the fiber to
change slightly over the course of the year, or whenever there's a spacecraft roll maneuver.

Hey Bonch. I just spent the last 15 minutes searching for images that would prove a theory of mine but I could use some help finding them. Here's the
premise: If the "fiber" is fixed on the CCD, then even when the spacecraft rolls, the fiber should still maintain it's orientation correct? The
"fiber" has a unique crescent shape, being denser on the right edge than the left. A roll manouver would put the fiber on the opposite side of the
Sun, but the open end of the crescent should still point towards it, at the same angle as before.

See what I'm getting at? Think you can find a couple of examples of that? Thanks in advance.

but its still sketchy and perfect looking in my book, even though the shadow is on the wrong side but meh sketchhhhhhy

You need to be objective, quit trying to see what you want to see and dismissing the evidence because it doesn't agree with that particular view.
Instead, seek the truth regardless of where it takes you. Evaluate the evidence impartially. Use deductive reasoning instead of emotions to try and
solve this. If this was a spaceship, roque planet, asteroid, etc. then why has it not moved in all the years the satellite has been sending photos?
Why does it not show up in any other satellite or telescopic photos, why only those from this one particular satellite? Does the shading and
highlighting match that of a spherical object in that location relative to the sun? Arguing that it just can't be a fiber on the lens because it
looks too "perfect" is no argument at all, because in fact it does NOT look perfect. It looks vaguely crescent-moon-shaped, but it's nowhere close
to the shape of a perfect sphere.

Originally posted by WanderingThe3rd
It even has different coloured rings too it, are you guys blind rofls, let me go photoshop it for some of you, sheesh

and what? someone said something on the lense? ok sure bud, thats why its the exact same thing in that video from last year but now in a different
spot? it also looks like its shiney, reflecting like, has some gloss too it.

the more i look at it, the more dull i think you guys are that are denying it

edit on 23-3-2012 by WanderingThe3rd because: (no reason
given)

Troll much?

The position of this fiber on the detector is fixed, and always shows up in the same position in the raw images. However, the processed images on
the website include a correction for the spacecraft roll angle so that solar north always points straight up. This causes the position of the fiber to
change slightly over the course of the year, or whenever there's a spacecraft roll maneuver.

Hey Bonch. I just spent the last 15 minutes searching for images that would prove a theory of mine but I could use some help finding them. Here's the
premise: If the "fiber" is fixed on the CCD, then even when the spacecraft rolls, the fiber should still maintain it's orientation correct? The
"fiber" has a unique crescent shape, being denser on the right edge than the left. A roll manouver would put the fiber on the opposite side of the
Sun, but the open end of the crescent should still point towards it, at the same angle as before.

See what I'm getting at? Think you can find a couple of examples of that? Thanks in advance.

Great idea! But to be totally conclusive don't we also need to show that it is not an actual C shaped object, it needs to have moved during the years
and not be in the same spot or something if it were not on the lens?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.