To comply with changing international privacy requirements, ICI informs its visitors that we use cookies on our web site. ICI only uses cookies to allow subscribers and members to more easily use our site and to record site utilization. No personal or private information is gathered or stored. More details, including how to disable cookies, can be found on our privacy and cookie policy page. If you disable cookies, you will see this message on future visits to our site. Please click the enable button to consent to accepting cookies.

Opinion: The Tax Threat to Your Mutual Fund

By Mike McNamee

May 7, 2015

Vanguard Chairman and CEO Bill McNabb sent “an open letter to all mutual fund investors” in the opinion pages of Thursday’s Wall Street Journal. His message: fund investors face a clear threat of higher costs, weaker returns, and a bailout tax to salvage other failing financial institutions—all if regulators get their way in imposing new rules on funds or their managers.

In “The Tax Threat to Your Mutual Fund,” McNabb, who is also chairman of the Investment Company Institute, warns that regulators who were charged with protecting taxpayers from future bailouts are now pursuing a course that “might place that burden squarely back on Main Street mutual fund investors without any solid evidence that the funds or their managers could bring on another panic.”

The reason: the Financial Stability Oversight Council in the U.S. and the multinational Financial Stability Board could declare that funds or their managers are “systemically significant financial institutions” (SIFIs), just like the highly leveraged banks whose failures wreaked financial havoc in the 2008 crisis. Under the Dodd Frank Act, “if one (SIFI) fails, all other SIFIs will be responsible for bailing it out,” McNabb writes.

The result: “the 90 million Americans invested in mutual funds for retirement, education or a new home could be forced to once again bail out ‘too big to fail’ Wall Street firms.”

“Investor returns would suffer even absent a bailout,” McNabb writes. “Mutual fund companies could be required to hold capital reserves, potentially up to 8% of the fund’s assets based on current Dodd-Frank requirements. Such capital requirements would be raised through fees paid by investors. Any capital reserves that are sitting in a mutual fund are not generating returns in the stock or bond markets. According to research from the American Action Forum, capital requirements could trim as much as 25 percent from a mutual fund investor’s returns over a lifetime of investing.”

This drive for SIFI designation ignores simple facts, McNabb says: “Mutual funds and their managers are not banks. They do not impose risks on financial markets like banks do. They have fundamentally different structures with fundamentally different risk profiles. They are organized and regulated in a way that limits risk to the financial system. Designating a handful of mutual funds as SIFIs will not reduce systemic risk in the markets.”

Bill McNabb brings another powerful voice to the chorus protesting regulations that would undermine mutual funds and harm their investors. As he concludes, “Let’s not regulate for regulation’s sake. And let’s not go back to the misguided approach of having Main Street bail out Wall Street.”

GMM Policy Forum: “It Always Comes Down to Trust”

By Todd Bernhardt

May 6, 2015

Over the 75-year history of the modern mutual fund industry, funds have helped to democratize investing, providing a tremendous array of investing options at a reasonable cost for millions of people. And given rapid advances in technology and the efficiencies that they can bring, the future looks even brighter, said Walter W. Bettinger II at the opening session of ICI’s 57th General Membership Meeting (GMM).

By Paul Schott Stevens

Statement of the Investment Company Institute at Senate Finance Committee Hearing on “Retirement Savings 2.0: Updating Savings Policy for the Modern Economy”

By Brian Reid

September 16, 2014

This statement was given on behalf of ICI by Brian Reid, chief economist, at the Senate Finance Committee’s hearing on “Retirement Savings 2.0: Updating Savings Policy for the Modern Economy.” For more information, see ICI’s full written testimony.

Happy Birthday ERISA! Congratulations on 40 Years

By Sarah Holden and Elena Barone Chism

September 2, 2014

Today marks the 40th birthday of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Signed into law on September 2, 1974, ERISA introduced bold steps to safeguard Americans’ employer-sponsored pensions and created the individual retirement account (IRA). Assets earmarked for retirement totaled $0.4 trillion at year-end 1974 (see the figure below). At this modest start, private-sector defined benefit (DB) plans accounted for 35 percent of the total; federal, state, and local plans for 34 percent; private-sector defined contribution (DC) plans for 17 percent; annuities for 13 percent; and there was a mere glimmer of IRA assets by year-end. Currently, total U.S. retirement assets are $23.0 trillion, and their composition has shifted considerably over the past 40 years.

By Miriam Bridges

June 9, 2014

In conversations exploring outcome-oriented investing, the globalization of the fund industry, and the next generation of retirement plans, industry leaders offered their perspectives on serving investors in an evolving world during several insightful sessions at ICI’s annual General Membership Meeting, held in Washington May 20–22.

Industry Leaders Reflect on Serving Investors in an Evolving World

By Christina Kilroy

June 4, 2014

Speaking on the Leadership Panel held Wednesday, May 21, at ICI’s General Membership Meeting (GMM), fund industry leaders agreed that challenges as well as opportunities abound for their businesses in today’s complex world.

By Rob Elson

May 21, 2014

Challenges abound in our increasingly global world, said Tony Blair, former prime minister of the United Kingdom. Yet our future could be brighter than ever, he insisted.

Blair’s stirring words came during a keynote speech at ICI’s 56th General Membership Meeting (GMM). After his opening remarks, Blair sat down with ICI Chairman Bill McNabb, Chairman and CEO of The Vanguard Group, to discuss a range of issues. The session headlined the three-day meeting, which began yesterday in Washington, DC.

By Todd Bernhardt

May 21, 2014

The fund industry needs to stop focusing on the moment and start focusing on outcomes when advising investors on their resources, said Laurence D. Fink, chairman and CEO of BlackRock, at ICI’s Annual Policy Forum, part of the Institute’s 56th General Membership Meeting (GMM).

Washington: Put Your (Retirement) Money Where Your Mouth Is

By Mike McNamee

March 4, 2014

When President Obama announced a new effort to expand access to retirement savings opportunities, ICI was among the first to applaud. The Administration’s “myRA” looks to provide a new option for Americans who want to put money aside for retirement, but who might not have access to a retirement plan through their workplace. These accounts would complement the wide array of investment options already available to these workers.

America’s Retirement System Is Strong

By Sarah Holden

December 18, 2013

One year ago, ICI released its landmark study, The Success of the U.S. Retirement System, a compilation of research from a wide range of sources, which found that the country’s retirement system is fostering economic security in retirement for Americans across all income levels.

ICI’s Guide to Avoiding a Common 401(k) Tax Trap

By Mike McNamee

December 9, 2013

A tax trap for retirement savings is catching many smart people unaware. If allowed to go unchecked, it could harm the retirement savings of millions of Americans. A columnist for the Washington Post was just the latest in a long list of victims.

Marginal Tax Rates and the Benefits of Tax Deferral

By Peter Brady

September 17, 2013

Second in a series of posts about retirement plans and the policy proposals surrounding them.

In a previous Viewpoints post, I discussed the difference between tax deferral—the tax treatment applied to retirement savings—and tax deductions and exclusions, such as the mortgage interest deduction or the exclusion of employer-paid health insurance premiums from income. The difference is often overlooked or misunderstood, leading to inaccurate analysis and harmful policy proposals.

Retirement Plan Contributions Are Tax-Deferred—Not Tax-Free

By Peter Brady

September 16, 2013

First in a series of posts about retirement plans and the policy proposals surrounding them.

In today’s fiscal and political climate, taxes are never far from politicians’ minds. Whether to achieve comprehensive tax reform or to raise revenue to meet budget deficits, members of Congress are now considering changes to a range of tax code provisions—including those governing retirement policy. Any comprehensive effort to address fiscal policy or tax reform should examine every option, but some discussions of retirement policy have been misguided. The tax treatment of retirement savings—tax deferral— too often has been lumped together with tax deductions (such as the deduction from income of mortgage interest expense) and tax exclusions (such as the exclusion from income of employer-provided health insurance premiums).

Key Points to Remember on Fund Fees

By Sean Collins and Bob Grohowski

Americans Support Their 401(k)s

By Mike McNamee

April 25, 2013

It’s pretty obvious to anyone who reads ICI Viewpoints that we believe 401(k) plans are a successful part of an overall retirement system that is working for working—and retired!—Americans. But we’re far from the only ones who think so. Surveys show that Americans share this confidence in the 401(k) and support the key features of 401(k)s and other defined contribution (DC) plans.

The Facts on Fees and 401(k)s

By Mike McNamee

The Facts on Limited Access to Retirement Funds Before Retirement

By Mike McNamee

April 22, 2013

One of the many strengths of the 401(k) system is its flexibility. Policymakers have built into 401(k) plans a careful mix of incentives that help workers save and preserve their savings for retirement—while still allowing limited access to their funds, in case of need, through hardship withdrawals and loans.

401(k) Plans Work in a Balanced Approach to Retirement Security

By Mike McNamee

No Accident: The Strengths of the 401(k) System

By Mike McNamee

April 18, 2013

Americans have saved $5.1 trillion dollars in 401(k) and other defined contribution (DC) retirement plans—plus another $5.4 in individual retirement accounts (IRAs) that are funded largely by assets rolled over from DC and other employer retirement plans.

IRA Rollovers Serve Investors Well

By David Abbey and Sarah Holden

April 12, 2013

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is preparing to reintroduce its controversial proposal to revise the long-standing definition of “fiduciary” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

Facts and Common Sense Undercut Distorted Demos View of 401(k)s

By Brian Reid

Article in The Week Misrepresents Americans’ View of 401(k)s

By Sarah Holden

April 26, 2012

Contrary to recent reporting by The Week (“401(k)s Are Failing Millions of Americans,” April 22, 2012), American workers both value their 401(k) retirement savings plans and are confident that 401(k)s will help them meet their retirement goals.

An Important Step in the Process of Enhancing 401(k) Fee Disclosure

By Ianthé Zabel

February 3, 2012

On February 2, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued final regulations concerning 401(k) disclosures. The rule requires companies that administer defined contribution plans to disclose administrative and investment costs to employers who sponsor the plans.

By Sarah Holden

November 16, 2011

According to a comprehensive new study, primary factors driving fees in 401(k) and other defined contribution retirement plans are the number of plan participants and average participant account balance, as well as the allocation of plan assets to equity investment options.

Let’s Set the Record Straight on 401(k)

By Paul Schott Stevens

April 13, 2011

As states and localities struggle to control their budgets, more and more policymakers are considering fundamental changes in the retirement plans offered to public employees. This year, at least eight states have taken up legislation to change part or all of their public retirement plans from traditional defined benefit (DB) pensions to defined contribution (DC) plans similar to the 401(k)s that that are now the most common plans in the private sector. Many more public employers are likely to consider such changes in coming years.

By ICI Viewpoints

November 22, 2010

The average 401(k) retirement account rose 31.9 percent in 2009, according to a report released today by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) and the ICI analyzing a group of consistent participants.