The (false) theory is that the media interviews with parents at Sandy Hook were staged by "crisis actors" who only pretended to be parents, and actually did not even live in Sandy Hook. This is the most common example, Nick and Laura Phelps, who are supposed to by played by a couple called Greenberg/Sexton. Here's the typical image that accompanies this theory:

The upper image is the Phelps being interviewed by CNN. The lower image is supposedly the Greenbergs/Sextons. There's a superficial resemblance, but many people claim it's obviously the same people.

There are some very strange similar ideas floating around out there, mostly originating with the website wellaware1.com, run by Ed Chiarini . One suggests that Sandy Hook parent Robbie Parker is Skateboarder Tony Hawk.

I've met Tony Hawk a few times, as I worked on the Tony Hawk video games. But it's obvious even from the photos used above that that idea is ludicrous. Either Ed Chiarini is simply trolling, or he's got some kind of strange face-blindness.

What's unfortunate is that some people repeat his claims - some are probably just trolling, but some might actually believe it.

Anyone who believes Chiarini's stuff, and checks him out has GOT to think it's nuts. I mean Betty White is the Queen, the Pope is Robert Blake, Dr Phil is David M Axelrod, Steve Martin is James Schlesinger, Peter Lanza is Michael MacDonald from MADTV, the Jackass guys are numerous people, the Columbine killers are the South Park creators, Ron Paul, Neil Armstrong, Jimi Hendrix, all are someone else. Come on now, when is it just TOO CRAZY for some people?

On Chiarini's facebook page, occasionally someone will tell him off. He has gone to their FB page and accused them of being an actor, and seeing other actors in their photos. So yes, he probably would think you are Tony Hawk. Obviously he can't say you and Tony Hawk are played by the SAME ACTOR, which he also says, cause you have a photo of yourself with him. He'd prob say it was photoshopped though!

Even if Laura Phelps was not Jennifer Sexton Greenberg and just happened to look exactly like her with a twin husband, she would still be an admitted actress who stars in the "Expressing Motherhood" show.

Even if Laura Phelps was not Jennifer Sexton Greenberg and just happened to look exactly like her with a twin husband, she would still be an admitted actress who stars in the "Expressing Motherhood" show.

Click to expand...

I belong to a community theatre, I do a couple of shows a year, and I did a couple of films. Does that mean if something happened to me it didn't really happen cause i'm an actress?

This article was originally received via email on March 5 and was posted on March 6. I have since observed enough inconsistencies with the piece and experienced enough disagreements with its author to remove it from the site and issue the following:Memoryholeblog.com / James Tracy are not affiliated with “US Intelligence Information Center.” Nor do they approve of the methods, allegations, findings or conclusions of “Preliminary Investigative Report: Actors Involved with the Sandy Hook Massacre” or “An Independent Investigation Into the Events Surrounding Sandy Hook.”

Photoshopping pics to make them look like 2 different people is also lame. The couple pictured in the interview in Sandy Hook IS Jennifer Sexton and her hubby. I know exactly what they look like, not from just these 2 incidents, this shit has been going on for a long time. It's the Sextons, so photoshop on, it's useless.
She and brother Tony and many other Greenbergs have been playing people for fools since 911.

Photoshopping pics to make them look like 2 different people is also lame. The couple pictured in the interview in Sandy Hook IS Jennifer Sexton and her hubby. I know exactly what they look like, not from just these 2 incidents, this shit has been going on for a long time. It's the Sextons, so photoshop on, it's useless.
She and brother Tony and many other Greenbergs have been playing people for fools since 911.

Click to expand...

The photos indicate otherwise.

Can you produce any evidence of your claim - specifically some high resolution images.

Photoshopping pics to make them look like 2 different people is also lame. The couple pictured in the interview in Sandy Hook IS Jennifer Sexton and her hubby. I know exactly what they look like, not from just these 2 incidents, this shit has been going on for a long time. It's the Sextons, so photoshop on, it's useless.
She and brother Tony and many other Greenbergs have been playing people for fools since 911.

Click to expand...

Do you know them personally? Who told you that? Why would these Greenbergs, who are supposedly filthy rich members of the elite who have multiple homes all over the country and jet set around the world, play grieving parents? Pin money? Kicks?

Hi, I Consider my self a fair minded person.
I believe I have seen some of the theories debunked.. but I still have questions on others.
Just like a Detective who has many theories &/or motives to explore.. we do not call them conspiracy nuts.. do we?
Some prove to be true.. some prove to be false. But just because one or two theories are proven to be false.. does not mean every single one is?

It seems that people will choose one faulty theory to debunk & then not address many others.. that are somewhat convincing.
you have only addressed one or 2 theories here.
This You tube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNz5hdUkW0s
shows 35+ Pictures of Greenburgs or others... linked to Aurora or Sandyhook.
Since you obviously have a lot of research on these photos..
Can you debunk some others contained? Are there some that you can not?
2nd question.. do you believe some pictures could be photo shopped?
Thanks

Hi, I Consider my self a fair minded person.
I believe I have seen some of the theories debunked.. but I still have questions on others.
Just like a Detective who has many theories &/or motives to explore.. we do not call them conspiracy nuts.. do we?
Some prove to be true.. some prove to be false. But just because one or two theories are proven to be false.. does not mean every single one is?

It seems that people will choose one faulty theory to debunk & then not address many others.. that are somewhat convincing.
you have only addressed one or 2 theories here.
This You tube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNz5hdUkW0s
shows 35+ Pictures of Greenburgs or others... linked to Aurora or Sandyhook.
Since you obviously have a lot of research on these photos..
Can you debunk some others contained? Are there some that you can not?
2nd question.. do you believe some pictures could be photo shopped?
Thanks

Click to expand...

Why don't you pick one photo that you think needs debunking, and explain why.

Hi, I Consider my self a fair minded person.
I believe I have seen some of the theories debunked.. but I still have questions on others.
Just like a Detective who has many theories &/or motives to explore.. we do not call them conspiracy nuts.. do we?
Some prove to be true.. some prove to be false. But just because one or two theories are proven to be false.. does not mean every single one is?

It seems that people will choose one faulty theory to debunk & then not address many others.. that are somewhat convincing.
you have only addressed one or 2 theories here.
This You tube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNz5hdUkW0s
shows 35+ Pictures of Greenburgs or others... linked to Aurora or Sandyhook.
Since you obviously have a lot of research on these photos..
Can you debunk some others contained? Are there some that you can not?
2nd question.. do you believe some pictures could be photo shopped?
Thanks

Click to expand...

Temblor,
I hope, as I am sure that Mick does, that when you do what he suggests it will not only spur you to do some self-checking but that it will also teach you something.
Don't expect others to always do for you that which you could do for yourself. You will learn new critical thinking skills etc. and how to protect yourself from misinformation deliberate and inadvertent. Hope you can show us something some day, too!