I think you are attempting to split hairs. There is no journalistic integrity in america, or even europe for that matter, so viewer preference falls
on liberal or conservative bias. Then how good looking the reporters are, how many sports are televised, etc.

When you have a choice for "a turd sandwich" and "a turd sandwich with mustard" most people will opt for the second. You get what you can...

CNBC reported the $43 trillion lawsuit against the nwo and the vp children got brutally murdered. Then cnbc took the lawsuit off their site/database.
Evil rich people wish to stay out of the limelight and they have enough money to do so.

At least fox news has pretty women compared to the dogs on the other networks. That is a plus!

I don't watch a lot of fox, but which pretty women do they have? I guess Megyn Kelly is decent but not my type. I don't know their others hosts beside
grechen and greta but I doubt you're talking about them.

CNN has Robin Meade and Brook Balwin, and MSNBC's Tamron Hall could get my lovin.

If sexy was the most important thing in choosing news the Spanish networks have the hottest hosts by far.

discussions on sexy hosts > discussions on which network is less bias.

Well I thinks its the motivation of the news that is the main difference. Normal news(cbs,nbc, etc) will report/comment on things that increase
viewership whether it's true or bs for increased ad revenue. Fox is motivated to influence your vote in the interest of big money/republican.
Fox is propaganda, other news is money grubbers.

I just wanna know why people think liberals and their media networks controlled by rich people, just as much as the conservative media is, is somehow
a better choice than the second.

Has anyone proved 9-11-2001 was a false flag? Have the democrats gone after bush and cheney who perpetrated the attacks? In fact clinton was making
fun of the "inside job" folks during the DNC rally 4 years ago and even makes fun of bohemian groove, as though only republicans go there.

Common people, we need progressive media and progressive parties in government. Until then there isn't much to discuss. If I want news "made in
america" I will stick to alex jones. If I want beauty pagents I will stick to fox news.

Fox, and MSNBC are both pretty bad in their obvious leaning towards the right, and left, respectively. It isn't that hard to figure out watching 5
minutes of each...but...whatever. It's not like CNN is much better. We need a real news station that reports news, and not just report political
views.

The difference there being that the former represents a clear and present danger to people, the latter does not.

That doesn't mean I condone lying. Hell, call them on it! Hold their feet to the fire so people can see the lies for what they are. But, to make
it a criminal act to tell a lie on TV is going way too far.

Correct.
I don't want their filthy spins and interpretations and agendas, just report the facts, is that too much to ask?
They are all filthy liars and I think this country would be better suited without them.
The US News Media and their FILTHY Propaganda makes Russian and North Korea News outlets etc blush.

Originally posted by Catacomb
Fox, and MSNBC are both pretty bad in their obvious leaning towards the right, and left, respectively. It isn't that hard to figure out watching 5
minutes of each...but...whatever. It's not like CNN is much better. We need a real news station that reports news, and not just report political
views.

Perhaps I was being a little extreme but I want to emphasize how dangerous allowing fear mongering liars free reign on major stations. I believe
other civilized countries have laws to stop this. Maybe just warning and shutting down a station would be enough.

Fox is huge with huge money and huge clout in our government.
It would be impossible in today's environment to even slow them down legislatively. Unless of course if the Republican party goes away.

I don't disagree that liars and fear mongers should be called out. The media, as the Fourth Estate, was supposed to be the guardians of the public
interest, holding the three branches of the government accountable for their actions. Instead, too many media outlets (including Fox News) have
decided to simply act as an arm of their respective political party. People, whether private citizens, news figures, or politicians, should be held
accountable for their lies. But, I think the best way to combat lies is with more speech. Fight fire with fire, so to speak.

Perhaps I was being a little extreme but I want to emphasize how dangerous allowing fear mongering liars free reign on major stations. I believe
other civilized countries have laws to stop this. Maybe just warning and shutting down a station would be enough.

Fox is huge with huge money and huge clout in our government.
It would be impossible in today's environment to even slow them down legislatively. Unless of course if the Republican party goes away.

Why should the government have to shut them down? That would be a direct violation of the first amendment and sets a slippery slope precedent. I
mean here we are trying to defend an open internet from the UN and the american government itself that censors things like crazy...and people like you
are making the tyrant's arguement.

Theoretically it is easy to "shut down" Fox News. Be better than them! Actually I see Democracy Now and Infowars shutting down ALL THE NETWORKS
and both the liberals and conservatives "soiling their underwear", for lack of a better analogy.

Free speech is good but unfortunately big money/corporations control politicians(and government),, courts(via politicians, govern through unelected
judges),bringing us to media which can spin reality any way they want. You can talk(free speech) all you want but if no one hears or believes you
does it really mean anything.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.