[Gnu-arch-users] Re: robin's per-directory regexps

From:

Robert Collins

Subject:

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: robin's per-directory regexps

Date:

Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:34:44 +1100

On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 07:47, Tom Lord wrote:
> If using `explicit'. Otherwise a name tag is used.
Doesn't that fall back to the not-supporting tree delta problem?
> And if explicit is used, untagged source is a hard (commit preventing)
> error. So there's no need for a special tree-lint case, is there?
untagged-source precious overrides this - and most users of explicit
whose configuration I know, are using untagged-source precious.
> > If a) untagged-source precious is in use, and b) no tag has been
> > created, won't the .arch-inventory file in queston NOT get added to the
> > archive ? And won't it /still/ perform it's overrides during the
> > changeset creation?
>
> > Tla get on the result will then give you a tree that iimmediately fails
> > tree-lint.
>
> That would be true except that, unless I'm overlooking something
> stupid, you can't commit (in any tagging method) without including all
> control files (because they automatically classify, by name, as
> source). In names-method trees, inline, and tagline -- you'll get a
> names tag "for free". With inline or tagline and --strict to commit
> you'll get an error. With explicit, you'll get an error even without
> --strict.
See above.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.