The Controversy of Zion: Occupation... Colonization... Killing is Good!

The “up and coming” well-known and much admired
Israeli politician and parliament member Ayelet Shaked of the
ultra-nationalist Jewish Home [political party] has again branded Palestinians as
terrorists, declaring as the 4th Zionist invasion of Gaza in the past
ten years was being unleashed: “Mothers of all Palestinians should also
be killed” she told the Daily Sabah, as she called for the slaughter of
Palestinian mothers who give birth to "little snakes."

In a call for Genocide, she added, “They have to die and their houses
should be demolished so that they cannot bear any more terrorists,"
Shaked said, adding, "They are all our enemies and their blood should be
on our hands. This also applies to the mothers of every dead terrorist
we eliminate."

On 7/7/14 Shaked wrote on her Facebook page:

Israeli MP Ayelet Shaked

"Behind every terrorist stands dozens of men and women, without whom he
could not engage in terrorism. They are all enemy combatants, and their
blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of
the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should
follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as
should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise,
more little snakes will be raised there."

The development comes as many officials from various countries have
slammed Israel's air strikes on the Gaza Strip. Many have condemned the
offensive diatribe, accusing Israel of massacring the Palestinians and
have lashed out at Israel, saying it is committing state terrorism
against the Palestinians in the region. Reacting to Shaked's remarks,
the Turkish premier said Israel's policy in Gaza is no different than
Hitler's mentality. "An Israeli woman said Palestinian mothers should be
killed, too. And she's a member of the Israeli parliament. What is the
difference between this morality and Hitler’s," he said speaking in
parliament, as he also questioned the world's silence toward Tel Aviv's
ongoing atrocities.

As the Zionist regime busies itself "Mowing the lawn," the obscene
phrase used in Israeli military circles to describe how, every couple of
years or so, Gaza is subjected to massive international crimes against
humanity is a massive display of firepower to “trim back Hamas’s
military capabilities and ambitions” in the words of its allies in the
US Congress. Its US funded armed forces are yet again attacking and
invading Gaza in violation of international and U.S. law. As former US
Congressman Dennis Kucinich reminds us, its construction of settlements
violates the Oslo agreement. Its Central Bank dries up the Gaza economy
and blocks payments to Gazan civil servants. Its total control brings
the Palestinians to utter subjection and total despair. Israel can kill,
injure, and humiliate Palestinians at will, with impunity, which is
exactly what gave rise to Hamas and strengthens Hamas’ hold in Gaza.

As journalist Rami Khoury reminds us, military assaults against Gaza
cause Israel to lose ground in three vital respects inasmuch as they
enhance Palestinian military resistance, intensify global condemnation
and pressure due to Israel’s disproportionate military savagery, and
“deepen the nationalist identity and will to struggle for justice among
all Palestinians, especially those children in Gaza who will grow up
with a single aim in life: to vanquish colonial Zionism”.

Meanwhile,
on 7/22/14 one of Americas largest airlines, Delta, has announced it is
canceling all flights to Israel citing reports that a rocket landed near
Tel Aviv's airport. This against the backdrop of a growing BDS [Boycott Divestment Sanctions] campaign
increasingly similar to the one that destroyed the pro-Zionist Apartheid
regime in South Africa. The developments come as the UN agency for
Palestinian refugees has recently said women and children make up a
sizable number of Palestinian fatalities caused by Israeli attacks on
the besieged region.

Undeterred, the US Senate, while claiming to be overworked, did find
time to pass (100-0) an AIPAC-drafted resolution supporting the Gaza
invasion. There is not one word of compassion for Palestinians killed or
injured, not a word calling for peace, not a word indicating that the
Senate would perhaps prefer to see the invasion end. On the other hand,
it calls for dissolution of the Palestinian unity government which has
been Netanyahu's goal since it was established.

“Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding United States support for
the State of Israel as it defends itself against unprovoked rocket
attacks from the Hamas terrorist organization. Whereas Hamas is a United
States-designated terrorist organization whose charter calls for the
destruction of the State of Israel; Whereas Hamas continues to reject
the core principles of the Middle East Quartet (the United Nations, the
United States, the European Union, and Russia)--recognize Israel's right
to exist, renounce violence, and accept previous Israeli-Palestinian
agreements; whereas Hamas has killed hundreds of Israelis and dozens of
Americans in rocket attacks and suicide bombings.”

The same kind of Resolution that AIPAC sends more than 80 to Congress
each year to make sure Congress does the right thing by the Zionist
regime still occupying Palestine.

U.S. Senate vote supporting the killing of Palestinians by Israel passes unanimously, 100-0. Wow! What does that even mean?

On 7/22/14, Israel's ambassador to the U.S. to the media [said] that Israeli
soldiers should be given the Nobel Peace Prize for the "unimaginable
restraint" they are showing in fighting Hamas, backing his
country's right to self-defense. Ambassador Ron Dermer made the comments
at an event hosted by the Christians United for Israel group late
Monday, according to a text of the speech posted on his Facebook
page. Comparing Hamas rocket fire on Israel to Germany's bombardment of
London during World War II, Dermer slammed those "shamelessly accusing
Israel of genocide and (who) would put us in the dock for war crimes. The
truth is that the Israeli Defense Forces should be given the Nobel
Peace Prize... a Nobel Peace Prize for fighting with unimaginable
restraint."

As for the truly pathetic Ms. Shaked, whose psychotic words and deeds
not only trumpet savagery against Palestinians and praise those who
would undertake a genocidal mission such as today being witnessed and
documented in Gaza, but have also become a clarion call corrupting
further the minds of Israeli youth and colonial squatters. May the
sick woman live to see the dismantling of the last of the 19th Century
colonial enterprises which she calls to slaughter those whose land it
still criminally occupies.

About This Site:

Color revolutions are, without a doubt, one of the main features of global political developments today. Should the casual reader immediately wonder what a "color revolution" is, keep reading, our view here is unique, but we most certainly have some answers.

Let us first begin with the Wikipedia definition. That website introduces the concept by stating the following:

"Color revolution(s)is a term used by the media to describe related [political] movements that developed in several societies in the CIS (former USSR) and Balkan states during the early 2000s. Some observers have called the events a revolutionary wave.

"Participants in the color revolutions have mostly used nonviolent resistance, also called civil resistance. Such methods as demonstrations, strikes and interventions have been [used to] protest against governments seen as corrupt and/or authoritarian, and to advocate democracy; and they have also created strong pressure for change. These movements all adopted a specific color or flower as their symbol. The color revolutions are notable for the important role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and particularly student activists in organizing creative non-violent resistance.

"These movements have been successful in Serbia (especially the Bulldozer Revolution of 2000), in Georgia's Rose Revolution (2003), in Ukraine's Orange Revolution (2004), in Lebanon's Cedar Revolution and (though more violent than the previous ones) in Kyrgyzstan's Tulip Revolution (2005), in Kuwait's Blue Revolution (2005), in Iraq's Purple Revolution (2005), and in Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution (1989), but failed in Iran's Green Revolution (2009–2010) . Each time massive street protests followed disputed elections or request of fair elections and led to the resignation or overthrow of leaders considered by their opponents to be authoritarian."

What the Wikipedia article fails to mention is the massive foreign funding, and at least any notion that color revolutions are psychosocial operations of deception.

It's a fact that Western governments (especially the US government) and various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) spend millions of dollars to co-opt and "channel" local populations of targeted countries against their own political leadership.

Empty democracy slogans and flashy colors aside, we argue that color revolutions are good old-fashioned regime change operations: destabilization without the tanks.

The secret ingredient is a sophisticated science used to manipulate emotions and circumvent critical thinking. History shows that, to much of the power elite, humanity is seen as a collection of nerve endings to be pushed and pulled one way or the other, sometimes made to tremble in fear, sometimes made to salivate like Pavlov's dogs. These days the manipulation is so pervasive, so subtle, so effective, that even critical individuals at times must necessarily fail to recognize how often--or in what context--they have fallen prey.

Of course fear is the most obvious emotion played upon to effect massive social change. One need only to reflect upon the last ten years, since 9/11, to know that fear is a primary instrument used to initiate and justify dangerous shifts in public policy.

But as humanity has been physiologically equipped with a range of emotions, and is not merely arrested and controlled by fear alone, a strata of behavioral and political science also found it useful to master the flip-side of the emotional spectrum, and by that we mean desire, and all that drives groups of individuals to act, even in the face of fear, in pursuit of something worthwhile.

Many are the professions that utilize this type of understanding, including (but not limited to) marketing, advertising, public relations, politics and law-making, radio, television, journalism and news, film, music, general business and salesmanship; each of them selling, branding, promoting, entertaining, sloganeering, framing, explaining, creating friends and enemies, arguing likes and dislikes, setting the boundaries of good and evil: in many cases using their talents to circumvent their audiences' intellect, the real target being emotional, oftentimes even subconscious.

(Legs for educational purposes only)

Looking beneath the facade of the color revolutionary movement we also find a desire-based behavioral structure, in particular one that has been built upon historical lessons offered by social movements and periods of political upheaval.

It then makes sense that the personnel of such operations include perception managers, PR firms, pollsters and opinion-makers in the social media. Through the operational infrastructure, these entities work in close coordination with intelligence agents, local and foreign activists, strategists and tacticians, tax-exempt foundations, governmental agencies, and a host of non- governmental organizations.

Collectively, their job is to make a palace coup (of their sponsorship) seem like a social revolution; to help fill the streets with fearless demonstrators advocating on behalf of a government of their choosing, which then legitimizes the sham governments with the authenticity of popular democracy and revolutionary fervor.

Because the operatives perform much of their craft in the open, their effectiveness is heavily predicated upon their ability to veil the influence backing them, and the long-term intentions guiding their work.

Their effectiveness is predicated on their ability to deceive, targeting both local populations and foreign audiences with highly-misleading interpretations of the underlying causes provoking these events.

And this is where we come in: to help deconstruct the deception.

But we will not just cover color revolutions here, as color revolutions are bound up in the larger geopolitical universe. A color revolution is only an instrument of foreign policy--only a tool--the ultimate object being the geopolitical advantages gained by powerful financiers and the brain trust they employ. It follows that understanding geopolitical context (and motive) is necessary to understanding the purpose of the color revolution.

Toward that end, we will discuss and analyze relationships of global power in great detail. We will highlight specific institutions of power; identify what their power rests upon; draw attention to the individuals that finance and direct their activities; speculate upon some of their motives; and get to know the broad range of tools they use to achieve them, tools which include the color revolution.

As in-depth studies into the color revolution are far too rare, and as the issue itself is far too obscure, we hope to draw more attention to it; to spark discussion and even debate.

It is an issue that takes time and patience. And it is for those that are willing to provide this time and patience that we offer this site.

“Never utter these words: 'I do not know this, therefore it is false.' One must study to know; know to understand; understand to judge.” --Apothegm of Narada

Geopolitical Writers and Critics:

Webster Tarpley: based in Washington D.C., Dr. Tarpley is an author, economist, historian, and expert in geopolitics, covert operations and false-flag terror.

Tony Cartalucci: based in Thailand, Mr. Cartalucci writes primarily about color revolutions, globalism, and Thai politics on his site, Land Destroyer.

F. William Engdahl: US-born author, economist, and historian, Mr. Engdahl is based in Germany, and publishes new online material usually on his own site, or at globalresearch.ca.

News Sites:

Global Research: website of the Centre for Research on Globalization, edited by Michel Chossudovsky, featuring multiple perspectives on globalism and geopolitics, including some of the most factual news perspectives regarding all geographical regions around the globe.

Infowars: the primary website of radio host and documentary filmmaker Alex Jones, based in Austin, Texas.