Secretary Kerry is right that climate change needs to be tackled like a "weapon of mass destruction"

Secretary Kerry got it right when he identified climate change as one of the most urgent issues facing the world in a February 16 speech in Jakarta. Kerry got it right on the science, the urgency, and the opportunity to be found in clean energy solutions. He ranked climate change right up there with “terrorism, epidemics, poverty, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.” He also got it right that we have the clean energy ability to tackle climate change and that American leadership and action is critical as part of the global solution. The US government is moving ahead to reduce carbon pollution at its source from our cars, trucks and power plants. We also need to reject major new infrastructure projects for dirty fuels starting with denial of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline permit. The US can do this without Congressional action, but strong public support is still critical in standing up to the fossil fuel industry and climate deniers. History will remember our actions – and our inactions. It is actions such as these at home that send the strongest message to the world that the US is serious about climate change.

In a time when we still regularly hear tired, old, polluter-generated talking points questioning climate change, Kerry called on us to trust the 97 percent. That is the 97 percent of scientists who say that climate change is real and largely due to our dependence on oil and coal. Making the rapid pace of climate change real, Kerry pointed out that “all 10 of the hottest years on record have actually happened since Google went online in 1998.”

We know that climate change is causing sea rise, end of species, ocean acidification, water shortages, fundamental transformation in agriculture, and extreme weather events. Kerry pointed out that the economic costs of climate change are massive – both from the cost of rebuilding and the “potentially catastrophic effects on the global supply chain.” And he urged us not to waste time debating whose responsibility it is to act. Although with this Kerry was calling on countries around the world to step up, I would add that this should also be a call to corporations and especially to the fossil fuel industry. Just as some countries such as the United States “contribute more to the problem and therefore must also contribute more to the solution”, some industries also contribute more to the problem and need to change their way of working if we are to reach solutions to climate change.

Pushing back against those who questioned the cost of a transition to clean energy, Kerry said it is an opportunity and reminded that the “devastating human toll pollution takes comes with a hefty price tag.” He urged governments around the world to “look further down the road” and factor in “the long-term cost of carbon pollution” and “the cost of survival.” And he turned the cost complaints on their head reminding us that “If the worst case scenario never materializes, the steps that we are urging will still leave our air and water cleaner, our food supply more secure, and our populations healthier. Meanwhile, if 97 percent of scientists happen to be correct, and the naysayers are wrong, then we will have thwarted one of the gravest threats to our planet.”

Kerry himself noted how appalling it is that so little has changed since the international agreement to tackle climate change in 1992 and blamed lack of political resolve. He noted that “as a result of this complacency, last year the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere reached the highest point in human history – despite all of the warnings.”

So, does this speech herald a change in US diplomacy? The launch of this “series of discussions” on the urgency of climate change comes as we have seen climate change more and more integrated into President Obama’s speeches at home and Secretary Kerry’s foreign policy meetings around the world. Kerry said that he is instructing Chiefs of Missions at US embassies around the world to “make climate change a top priority and to use all the tools of diplomacy they have at their disposal to address this threat”. Beyond that, Kerry pointed to the actions that the US is taking including curbing carbon pollution at its source in our cars, trucks and power plants. He talked about using bilateral discussions such as those with China to strengthen climate action and to lay a better groundwork for the international climate negotiations. He said that we need to stop incentives to climate polluting coal and oil. Kerry’s speech should also mean putting a stop to dirty energy infrastructure projects such as the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would drive expansion of the carbon-intensive tar sands oil production.

We know what we have to do. And hopefully this speech and others like it will herald additional strong leadership and action from the US on climate. Kerry certainly paints the vision of what we can achieve in tackling climate change: “If we come together now, we can not only meet this challenge, we can create jobs and economic growth in every corner of the globe. We can clean up the air our families breathe and make our neighborhoods healthier places to live. We can help ensure farmers and fishers can still make a sustainable living and feed our communities. We can avoid disputes and even entire wars over oil, water and other limited resources. And we can make good on the moral responsibility we all have to leave our children a planet that is clean and healthy and sustainable for decades to come.” That’s the right vision. Now let’s keep moving ahead to put the action into place to make this happen with American leadership and international cooperation.

Comments

Would love to think that Kerry got the idea of comparing climate change to WMDs by reading my EcoOptimism post last month:

"We should really think of [remaining fossil fuels that we leave in the ground] … as neutralized WMDs since burning them would, in the words of Columbia environmental science prof and former NASA scientist James Hansen, 'make most of the planet uninhabitable by humans.'”

What a fool John Kerry is. Anyone who believes this nonsense has probably signed the Petition to Ban Di-Hydrogen Monoxide more than once.

Global air temperatures have been flat for over 16 years, directly falsifying the CAGW hypothesis and the claims of the catastrophe-mongers. The whole of CAGW rests upon the claim that the Earth's climate is dynamically unstable - that it responds to temperature perturbations with positive feedback. Yet in all of recorded and geologic history, that has never happened.

Real scientists (like Steven McIntyre and Anthony Watts) follow the Scientific Method. "Climate Scientists" like James Hansen, Michael Mann, Keith Briffa, Phil Jones, and the rest of the IPCC 'establishment" REFUSE to do so. Their data and code and algorithms are secret. One should wonder why...

"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow - even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !"
- Phil Jones, one of the Guadians of the Flame of Catastrophe...

In past Switchboard comments 10 years ago I said that CC/GW would work as a WMD. I also said that we HAVE TO MAKE THE SUN OUR SOLE ENERGY-POWER SOURCE. Otherwise we end up having CC/GW wiping out our kids' futures. And by using the SUN, we can also be rid of all problems from using fossil fuels and from N-energy.
OUR SUN CAN PROVIDE ALL THE ENERGY WE NEED!!!

We just need to use it much more effectively, and recently, work shows a catalyst using sunlight to split water to get hydrogen, THE CLEAN FUEL. Many environment-nature groups including NRDC seem not to have registered to this report made iin "Science" from AAAS, Dec. 7, 2012. Vehicles are running on hydrogen, but NRDC and others seem to be stuck on CAN'T Canting against bad energy with no viable programs being proposed for clean energy. J.A.Singmaster,III, Ph.D., UCDavis, 76, Environmental Chemist, Ret
I challenge NRDC and its leaders to report on making the SUN OUR SOLE ENERGY-POWER SOURCE and stop CAN'T Canting.

Mr. Singmaster, with all due respect, there is no such thing as a catalyst that reduces the amount of energy required to split water into H2 and O2. It takes a certain amount of energy to break an atomic bond, and catalysts do not change that.

The "catalyst" you are talking about is always some sort of metal that is consumed (oxydized) during the creation of hydrogen. Doing this on a large scale to create hydrogen "fuel" would consume the world's supply of that metal, meaning we'd have to then build facilities to convert that metal oxide back into metal and oxygen. The energy consumed to do that, taking all inefficiencies into account, results in a net energy loss for the whole process.

Hydrogen is just a "battery". And not a very efficient one. There is no reason to convert sun to hydrogen and then hydrogen to electricity. You simply use the sun to make electricity, store the electricity, and then use it to drive motors.

Secretary Kerry needs to look around and tend to the increasing crises overseas instead of making sensationalist , over dramatic, and useless comments about the weather that serve no purpose. He needs to come to our state and get a feel of "global warming": like the 8 inches of it in the back yard and some of the coldest temperatures on record this winter, in an area where 45 degrees used to be cold. If Secretary Kerry is more interested in the weather, maybe he should resign and get a job at a local tv station.
"Snow in 49 of 50 states"
"All Great Lakes completely frozen"
"Scientists see mini ice age ahead"
"Climate is cyclical scientists report"

About

Switchboard is the staff blog of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the nation’s most effective environmental group. For more about our work, including in-depth policy documents, action alerts and ways you can contribute, visit NRDC.org.