Captaincy conundrum for India and England

In reality, the degree of difficulty involved in captaincy lies somewhere between those who believe it's a mystery Sherlock Holmes couldn't unravel and the camp of great Australian leg-spinner Bill 'Tiger' O'Reilly who concluded; "My Collie dog could captain a cricket team."

MS Dhoni (left)and Alastair Cook. Pic/Getty Images

However two international captains, Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Alastair Cook —provided they retain their jobs — will soon face a task closer to the Holmes than the O'Reilly degree of difficulty.

Both Dhoni and Cook will have a return bout with an opposing captain who handed them a drubbing, a whitewash, a hiding — take your pick which terminology you use — but whichever way you perceive the situation, it's the toughest task any captain faces.

The difficult task...The difficulty of the task facing both Dhoni and Cook is created by the style of the opposing captain. As long as Michael Clarke's dodgy back holds out, Australia will commence both those Test series with a huge advantage.

Clarke's style is ultra-aggressive (with an attack to match) so he'll be prodding the opposition from the opening delivery of the series. In contrast Dhoni, at least in the Test arena away from home, is a captain who tends to be reactive rather than pro-active. Clarke's style wins that contest every time.

In Cook's case he's ultra-conservative and during the five-nil drubbing in Australia, even when he had the opposition teetering on the edge of the cliff, he couldn't initiate the final shove.

As much as anything, that's what frustrated Kevin Pietersen; he's an aggressive cricketer who likes to win and he could see England, unconvincingly led by Cook, had little chance of beating Australia.

It may well be that Pietersen had worn out his credits as a match winner but it still makes little sense to cast aside your best batsman to bolster a captain who is out of his depth. At least out of his depth in a head-to-head battle with a captain like Clarke.

Supporters of Cook will say he can improve. While an important part of captaincy is learning on the job from your mistakes, there are certain critical things about the task that can't be learned.Aggressive intent and a positive approach can't be taught and Cook will be hard-pressed to acquire those innate qualities. He's unlikely to match Clarke in a contest where those attributes tilt the scales.

Dhoni is a slightly different case. He does have an aggressive streak as a captain and it stands him in good stead in both shorter forms of the game. However, that trait seems to desert him in a Test series played away from his beloved home turf.

Dhoni's failings could be caused by a combination of things. Firstly, the short forms of the game virtually dictate how you should play whereas in Test cricket, the captain has to establish a pattern and then attempt to impose his will on the opposition.

Secondly, a captain can stay in the job too long; this leads to him becoming stale and adopting a more conservative approach.

Hard for IndiaIt's going to be hard for India to beat Australia away from home; they don't possess the fast bowlers that are crucial to winning on bouncy pitches and there's a question mark over their batting under those conditions.

India may not win under another captain (most likely Virat Kohli) but they have no chance under Dhoni. On the last tour of Australia, India went downhill fast under his leadership and unless the injection of youth has an inspirational affect, I don't see Dhoni reversing that trend.

Advantage Cook, but...In Cook's case he has one advantage; his next meeting with Clarke will be on English soil. Nevertheless, it won't help Cook much, as his team is short on match winners with Pietersen's dismissal and Australia's strong pace attack should be suited to English conditions.

The real problem for England is they have virtually no alternative choice for captain. Neither situation bodes well for India or England in a series where captaincy could make all the difference.