There has been a lot of talk across the UK legal sector recently about the legal aid changes that have now come into force. As part of their cost saving strategy, the government is aiming to significantly reduce the amount spent on legal aid each year. Their target is to reduce the previous figure of around £2.2 billion a year by £350 million.

The government's stated aim is to safeguard legal aid for those who really need it by ensuring there isn't wastage elsewhere. They have therefore made reforms to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO).

There will be a number of areas of law that will be hit the most, namely family law, employment law, clinical negligence law and immigration law. Those going through divorce or separation are no longer able to claim legal aid in most cases. This includes separations that impact children, something that has been highly criticised. Those taking legal action against a former employer, for example those claiming unfair dismissal, will also be impacted. An area of law which is often referred to when discussing wastage is negligence and these changes will make it more difficult for many to gain compensation in situations of clinical negligence. Another area where there will be an impact is immigration where a person is not detained.

There will be some areas where legal aid will still be available within family law and immigration law. Some involved in family law cases where domestic violence can be proven, child abduction has occurred or someone has been forced into marriage will still be entitled to legal aid. It will also still be available in asylum cases.

There are fears amongst many in the legal sector that these cuts could have a major negative impact on certain areas of law. According to the Guardian, research has suggested that 25 percent of lawyers and advisors fear the knock-on effect will lose them their jobs. Another concern is that many will be unable to afford good legal advice and will take the law into their own hands as a result; that more people will attempt to represent themselves.

A general consensus is that vulnerable people will suffer, with some claiming it is an attack on the poor. While wealthier members of society will always be able to afford legal representation, some cannot, and this could mean that those without the necessary funds will not be able to carry out justifiable legal action in certain circumstances. For example, those impacted by medical negligence might not be able to begin proceedings for compensation which they may be fully entitled to. There has clearly been wastage in this sector, and it is right that this is looked at, but the danger is that it will lead to people not getting the compensation they are entitled to. These changes could lead to people remaining in unhappy marriages, and children remaining in unhappy households, as divorce becomes unaffordable to some. There are suggestions that there will be instances where one party in a separation will be able to afford legal representation while the other will not be able to, meaning the wealthier party is more likely to come out of a divorce better placed.

There certainly is the opportunity to save costs within the legal sector, but is ending legal aid in certain legal sectors really the best way of saving money? When looking to save on costs it is difficult to get the balance right. The reality is that money can be saved in legal aid and there are circumstances where legal aid isn't required. Rather than targeting whole areas of legislation, though, would it not make more sense to reduce the amount people are entitled to or the number of people who qualify? For example, the threshold of those who can receive financial assistance could be changed. It is important to support those who need it, while not using tax payer's money unnecessarily. If the government is attempting to safeguard legal aid for those who really need it, why are they taking its availability completely away from certain sectors?

In some occasions, other persons, named third parties, may offend or injure you mentally or physically. In some occasions, it can be a firm or an institution that hurts you, and not an individual, such as schools, or the government. The majority of these injuries come from broken products, falls, work accidents or car accidents, so they aren't caused deliberately; to stay safe make sure to contact a personal injury lawyer.

When this happens, the law will blame the guilty party for injuring the other individual. Whenever you are physically injured or you experience emotional pain as a result of a deliberate action or carelessness of a third party, you have the right to be compensated. You have to address to a Personal Injury Lawyer, because he/she is familiar with the actions that have to be taken in order to for you to be compensated.

A lawyer who is an expert in Tort Law is actually a personal injury lawyer, so he knows how to deal with civil wrongs. This kind of lawyer knows how to support his clients and to aid them obtain positive compensation from the other parties that are also involved. If there isn't an agreement between the parties, the personal injury lawyer will contact an injury attorney to get this case to trial. Remember that if the incident gets to court, your representative has to be at the same level as the one that the other party has. You have to know that insurance companies have great representatives who are very good when it comes to personal injury laws, so your representative has to be the same, if not better. Lawyers must be aware of all the modifications in the law prior to pleading in court in order to support their clients. This way, they specialize in a particular domain which allows them do their job avoiding the risk of not being in touch with the current adjustments or rules.

A reliable lawyer will keep taking legal courses to enhance his knowledge in this field, being aware of the fact that his clients depend on his capacity to understand and arrange laws for their advantage. Prior to choosing a personal injury lawyer, you should check whether he has faced related cases before. In most of the cases, you can find on the internet information about lawyers' experiences, so use it when you are searching for a great lawyer. If you set an appointment with a personal injury lawyer, which will probably be for free, you will be told if you can receive a financial recompense. For example, if you were involved in a car crash and you demonstrated your innocence, the lawyer will work really hard to get you a financial reimbursement which will pay you back the hospitalization bill or will compensate your lost salaries. A personal injury lawsuit takes a lot of time, so you won't get your compensation in two days. More than this, since several lawsuits involve excellent acquaintance of the law, there are personal injury lawyers who specialize in specific types of cases, such as mal praxis.

It is very important to be aware of how to react when you suffer an accident; for this reason a personal injury lawyer might help. For instance, there are states that demand car crash victims to declare what occurred in a specific period of time, generally of 60 days. These rules are different in all countries, but since you are a citizen, you need to know how to react if there is an accident.