kingcast955@icloud.com -- In the Civil Rights Justice system there are two sets of people: Those who are haters and those who fight back. These are their stories. Blink-Blink.
Movies: KingCast.net and KingCast65 YouTube -- A NENPA member news and information journal.

Hahahaha... after giving me the boot they went back and read some more hahahaaa... now I'm laughing Real Good! I mean, really well. I forget I was an English major, right.This is hootlarious! I wish I had saved some of the comments from being banned at Free Republic after many people wrote in to support my position in NYC: A Family Court Referee has indirectly ordered me to remove evidence of lesbian-based judicial and systemic bias against a straight mother, Sandee Chadee as noted in the movie. There were a couple of asshats who kept trying to knock me down for being a blogger, and I responded in kind by asking them if it would have mattered if I had written the same thing while I worked for the Indianapolis Star. But many many people were applauding my tenacity and saying that civil disobedience is warranted. Anyway, naturally they did not publish what I wrote today:

I am without a clue as to why this story was pulled but I am posting a copy of this page to my own journal page. I can only surmise that the story was pulled because I also attack Republican or allegedly conservative politicians, so the moderators have decided to excise me from the midst. If so, that would be a shallow approach to life, not so free after all, right. These guys are just as bad as Daily Kos and all the other Internet mafia make me laugh -- just a bunch of online hypocrites.

Now here is the same pattern with respect to the so-called "liberals" or "progressives" at Daily Kos who kicked me off because I doth complain too much about NH AG cum U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte's bogus Indictment against me that I defeated using this journal and podcasts and now I've got her all hemmed up in the U.S. Court of Appeals on a serious First Amendment issue because she and her Republican pals and the Nashua Police Department banned me from their happy little publicly-advertised rallies. Funny thing now is that now they too complain about Kelly Ayotte and for some of the very same reasons that I was KingCasting what, six or seven years ago, LOL. But some current kossacks are not sheeple; they get it. And so do others.Then came New England Street Riders, who kicked me off for protesting too much about Triumph's faulty crankshafts in the 2002-2003 955i engines, see KingCast buyer's guide to Hinkley Triples. I am not at liberty to speak about that beyond saying what I just said, but I will say that I continue to support Triumph and will keep on riding them until I can't ride anymore :) And as to NESR, they were nowhere to be found during the Cody Eller motorcycle road rage trial, which is in substantial measure still ongoing because of the Laurie List violation regarding Pelham's Eugene Stahl.The morale of the story is that these chat boards are nothing more than little fiefdoms that are no more into open exchange of ideas than the people and institutions they criticize. And while I will laugh about it in 2013, the truth is that it is more a crying shame.

28 December 2012

Rebecca Resendez, 14 years old at the time of the alleged Statutory rapes and drug dealings of Marina Bay developer William O'Connell died in a fiery car crash just as the trial was finally scheduled. She is reported as stating that "No one would believe me...." Here is the Patriot Ledger story. I applaud their coverage, actually. But remember at noted repeatedly in my courtroom coverage, the cocaine that is at issue in the Statutory Rape case involving babysitter Phyllis Capuano is most likely from the same source as the cocaine in the Quincy Road Rage case with nephew Robert O'Connell. Remember what Jennifer Bynarowicz -- owner of the car in which firefighter Joseph Fasano was riding -- said to the police on hand?"It's my stuff. You won't believe me....(where I got it)." Note that Ms. Bynarowicz and William O'Connell have been linked as well, chummy friends at a minimum. I documented that online but no other media dared to publish that fact. And what I still have a hard time believing is that cocaine charges were not brought for the cocaine that was on firefighter Joseph Fasano's face when Robert O'Connell shot him as he rushed up to O'Connell's Porsche. It was "recreational cocaine," watch the movie. Fascinating. Almost, but not quite as fascinating as the dearth of coverage of this death in the Boston Globe and Boston Herald. Milton is a dangerous place: Death it seems, surrounds William O'Connell and Joseph Fasano recall the untimely passing of William Sanderson down off the Vineyard as well as the death of Joey Fasano's young child. The Ledger also reported on Robert O'Connell's two-month stint on the Attempted Murder case involving Joseph Fasano. He copped a Plea on 25 September, 2012 but I missed all of that as I was busy moving out of State around that time and preparing for an early November trip here to Seattle. In that case my gut tells me that Mr. O'Connell was in legitimate fear of his life. Joey Fasano is built like a walking bicep and he was on cocaine and probably other drugs and moving toward a guy built more like pencil, no offense just sayin'.

WHEREAS affordable housing is a basic Human Right, and;WHEREAS the prevailing economy in 2013 remains depressed, and; WHEREAS citizens who don't own their own homes have the right to responsive landlords and clean, safe living environments;

WE THE PEOPLE of Seattle, Washington hereby proclaim:
That a landlord's failure to respond to a Service of Process by Sheriff, coupled with a failure to respond to same by Regular and Certified U.S. Mail shall immediately, on a showing of non-compliance, vest with all tenants the right to escrow rent monies with the City Treasury until said landlord files a Notice of Appearance in the applicable court.

The Escrow Department shall maintain a list of noncompliant landlords on a public website to be updated daily, all interest bearing﻿ on such account is to be distributed to area homeless shelters... Back story here. Public Craigslist posting, check. Bad landlord, check. Fire Code violations, check. Internet off twice in two months for days on end, check. LL knowledge that Internet was essential for the tenants' workload, check. Broken kitchen appliances and repeated attempts to make YouTube remove the dirt from the Internet, check. Failure to return rent monies owed, no check. The first attempt to remove this information from YouTube was granted but that is under appeal. The second video remains for the reasons noted herein, and this new video, imploring legislation, will remain as well. Here is some back story on legislative attempts that reached the Massachusetts Senate floor in Robert Taylor's Law.
Meanwhile read the Sheriff's notice: Lights on, no answer. Calls made, no answer. Card left, no answer. Whatever the case you will be exposed and another attempt at service will be made via Certified and Regular U.S. Mail pursuant to Washington Rules of Service, then a Judgment will be had against you in Court and all of it will be thoroughly documented online to protect other innocent victims who move to Seattle based on your online misrepresentations. Dance away the heartache my friend.

26 December 2012

New video up before 6p EST -- Traveling and need to find good broadband.2 January 2013 update: NY Courts are reading along:

Perhaps they will next issue an order for the fit mother to undergo psychiatric examinations in order to cover their tracks..... same old, same old. Now then read about the "Free" Republic, LOL:

Hahahaha... after giving me the boot they went back and read some more hahahaaa... now I'm laughing Real Good! I mean, really well. I forget I was an English major, right.

I see the Free Republic has pulled my story about how the government issued an invalid Order for me to remove damaging evidence about how so-called liberal judges are doing bad things in NYC courts. The thread was here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2972619/posts.I am without a clue as to why this story was pulled but I am posting a copy of this page to my own journal page. I can only surmise that the story was pulled because I also attack Republican or allegedly conservative politicians, so the moderators have decided to excise me from the midst. If so, that would be a shallow approach to life, not so free after all, right. These guys are just as bad as Daily Kos and all the other Internet mafia make me laugh -- just a bunch of online hypocrites.

New video coming by 4:30 EST Warner Brother put a global block on it for using music from The Wall... "Best Days of Our Lives." So the album about oppression results in censorship even though I am not for profit on YouTube. Need to make sure I have canceled the ads they keep forcing me into. This movie below is BLOCKED.

Basically, who the hell is this referee and who the hell is said referee to be telling mother Sandy Chadee what my editorial content is going to be without an evidentiary hearing and certain findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with required Constitutional protections awarded to the press?Dear Attorney Mitek:
I have reviewed what appears to be a Court ORDER directed at me by way of a third party who has absolutely no editorial control over what I chose to publish. As the ORDER appears to be in violation of my First Amendment Rights, principles and duties incumbent of the Fourth Estate I am going to respectfully decline to follow any such ORDER unless or until a Court of competent jurisdiction holds an evidentiary hearing that addresses the threshold requirements involved in any Prior Restraint sort of case, i.e. compelling governmental interest, narrowly tailored, least restrictive means, etc.
See my related journal entry and upcoming movie (later this evening) on this matter. Should you wish to actively pursue this issue, please email me here to arrange for a mutually satisfactory time to schedule a hearing on the merits as I am on the West Coast throughout the Holiday Season. We can determine what address should be used for any Subpoenas at that time and we will then go forward with an eye toward protection of any and all Constitutional interests as the Law requires. http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2012/12/child-law-guardian-rita-kaufman-removed.html I will say this: I have never lost a First Amendment defense issue personally or an behalf of any criminal client in years gone by. Further, I am 75/25 W/L on offense. The name of the journal is the name of the game. Respectfully submitted,

Today's feature presentation is loading up now so get your popcorn and truffle butter ready. Here is your back story with prior videos including testimony to the NH Committee on Redress and Grievances on mortgage foreclosure fraud, DCYF and NH Family Court abuse and more. To those of you I didn't have time to include in this short video you may want to call in to Kevin Avard's show in the second week of January, stay tuned.
Meantime I suggest you read NH Const. Article § 32.
[Art.] 32. [Rights of Assembly, Instruction, and Petition.]

The people have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer.

21 December 2012

NY Courts are reading along!Perhaps they will try to order the fit motherto undergo psychiatric exams next.Try to cover those tracks any way they can, right.

Dear Attorney Mitek:

I have reviewed what appears to be a Court ORDER directed at me by way of a third party who has absolutely no editorial control over what I chose to publish. As the ORDER appears to be in violation of my First Amendment Rights, principles and duties incumbent of the Fourth Estate I am going to respectfully decline to follow any such ORDER unless or until a Court of competent jurisdiction holds an evidentiary hearing that addresses the threshold requirements involved in any Prior Restraint sort of case, i.e. compelling governmental interest, narrowly tailored, least restrictive means, etc.

See my related journal entry and upcoming movie (later this evening) on this matter. Should you wish to actively pursue this issue, please email me here to arrange for a mutually satisfactory time to schedule a hearing on the merits as I am on the West Coast throughout the Holiday Season. We can determine what address should be used for any Subpoenas at that time and we will then go forward with an eye toward protection of any and all Constitutional interests as the Law requires.

I will say this: I have never lost a First Amendment defense issue personally or an behalf of any criminal client in years gone by. Further, I am 75/25 W/L on offense. The name of the journal is the name of the game.

Respectfully submitted,

Preamble: $85K is no princely sum, particularly in NYC and especially to deal with the heartache and headache that a Family Court deals with. However, that being said there is no reason for the Court, by and through Sr. Court Attorney Jennifer N. Mitek, to make it harder on itself than it has to be, and trying to truncate my First Amendment Rights without Due Process and an evidentiary hearing is one way certain to make your life a living hell, just ask Senator Kelly Ayotte (First Cir. Ct. App 12-1891) who has $120K in her defense fund according to a Sunlight Foundation reporter who interviewed me at length last week. Now I will gladly attend an evidentiary hearing that countenances the principles enunciated below, and where I can remind the Court that Carlos Pena issued a false police complaint against Sandy Chadee and Yours Truly......

Video and details later but there is no way in hell I am removing anything from my web journals.Dear Ms. Chadee: I am in receipt of your email with a Court ORDER directing you to somehow take control of my editorial content such that I remove any and all postings relative to Carlos Pena and his family. I will not entertain any such notion.The things that Mr. Pena have said and done, and the directives and omissions of the Court are a matter of public interest. As such all of my work will remain online barring a showing of a narrowly-tailored, compelling governmental interest as adjudicated by a Court ORDER after taking testimony from me. 25 Dec add-in: Least Restrictive Means, can't forget that too or I will sue the living snot out of that Court for Injunctive Relief at a minimum.The Court seems to have forgotten that Mr. Pena falsely accused me (and you) of unlawful harassment in front of a Police Station while police were standing right next to him. He filed such charges with the Police under Oath and at some point I intend to take civil and criminal action against him based on those false and defamatory statements.As such, you can take this email straight to the Court and advise them of my contact information so that the Court can subpoena me for a hearing. The Court should of course be aware of my history as a First Amendment trial attorney and of the fact that Prior Restraint is unlawful unless I am divulging information about the child himself. I will forward my address to you under separate cover.Best regards,Christopher King, J.D.http://KingCast.net -- Reel News for Real Peoplehttp://MortgageMovies.blogspot.com -- Documenting Deceit617.543.8085/m 866.215.1207/f

Those of you who follow this journal page know that the Rajdulari Music project from Harlem is one of my more important lifestyle pieces, and the Cody Eller motorcycle road rage trial with courtroom footage and analysis is one of my more important court features. Well there are going to be massive updates on both of them.First The Good: The Rajdulari movie should be up by tonight; just need final review by the artist. It is a wonderful production made relatively simple because of the quality of the singer and her band and the love that was present that fine autumnal evening at Billie's Black. The top video is a placeholder.Then the Not-so-Good CT DSS wonk Roderick Bremby and Cody Eller trial:

There is a huge delay in Title XIX programs in Connecticut. DSS Commissioner Roderick Bremby and his lawyers are flat out liars, claiming that we did not complete our Title XIX application on behalf of our mother on 15 Dec. 2011 last year, but we did. Anyway in a companion case Briggs v. Bremby he got slammed on his Motion to Dismiss and on the legal theory itself, i.e. the Court found that there is an independent legal right under 42 U.S.C. §1983 how about that.Next, whatever happened that fateful night between Cody Eller and William Hawksley -- right now standing as a Second Degree Assault and Reckless Conduct conviction -- may be about to be re-examined: First you saw the conviction, then you saw me discuss possible creative sentencing with Garage 71 while most (all) of the other biker websites sat around and watched me. Well there is certain to be a pothole in the road coming up soon:

Defense Counsel Jeffrey Kaye (seen next to Judge Colburn) on opening day at the Jury View informs me that there is now a Gag Order imposed such that his Motions to Set Aside the Verdict and for New Trial cannot be discussed. I describe the problem in the first link: Essentially Pelham Officer Eugene Stahl's name appears on a Laurie List because there is something in his background that is exculpatory in nature such that defense counsel may be permitted to inquire. Mr. Eller's lawyers were unlawfully denied that opportunity.I found one case that indicates less-than-perfect conduct such that the DUI/DWI trial was thrown out. Prior to the gag order Attorney Kaye told me that case was not the reason; there is more.... and it may not have to do with the shooting that happened the week before the Cody Eller trial in which some kid ran from the cops and struck their cars with his. Time will tell, but time would tell better if the big money major press and their lawyers would get off their duffs and file suit to open this case.Your Honor: Gag Orders are Unconstitutional, particularly in a case involving the public interest. This is not a divorce or child custody case so for Pete's sake let the public know what the hell is going on here. As a former Assistant State Attorney I cannot fathom why you have done this. As someone who faced a wrongful and hate-filled First Amendment beat down prosecution at the hands of former NH AG Kelly Ayotte I beat her and her attempted gag order (Oct 2005) because my case as NAACP Legal Chair was a matter of public concern so yah, I kind of think I tend to know what I am talking about, with all due respect... even though it sure did tie former NH AG John Arnold up in knots before he resigned amidst his ethics issues LOL.

"County Attorney Albrecht has withdrawn his request to amend the bail conditions so as to prohibit the publication of information about the potential witnesses in this case. He has sent the court a letter indicating that the facts in this case are insufficient "to find that the defendant's prior web site postings constitute a danger to a person or the community or are of such nature to be intimidating to a potential witness to warrant the condition in question."

KingCast: Finding fault in NH Law Enforcement is kind of like shooting fish in a barrel... because they are perpetually making mistakes that violate the public trust. But don't get mad at me I'm just Your Humble Narrator. Here are all of the KingCast Cody Eller videos. More videos at the links and below the fold, including the courtside tussle between Cody Eller's counsel and me before we smoothed things out. Do I still think that Cody Eller did something wrong? Yes I do. But do I think that there is something fishy going on as well? Yes I do even if it is only the failure to notify opposing counsel of Officer Stahl's predicament. Life gets interesting, doesn't it?

A privacy complaint from a woman who publicly advertises her rental space? I think not.Christopher King
3:23 PM 20 hours ago
to support, ciudadflamenco, sheriff, kcso.recruiter 12:20 pm update
19 Dec. 2012: Verified: Four attempts were made to serve her by way of KingCounty Sheriff/Detectives and she dodges ALL OF THEM, even though she clearly knows of the lawsuit, because it is a) Noted in email correspondence I sent to her and; b) Mention in the movie of which she complains. Call for Susan Dranek(sp?) at the King County Sheriff's office number I previously supplied.
Now then, you clearly see what is going on here: You have a valid, newsworthy issue involving an illegal property with no written leases, illegal and potentially dangerous to deadly egress matters and a landlord dodging service and attempting to make me look like the proverbial Bad Guy.
I'm not having it, nor should you. The movies stays up. Sincerely, Christopher King, J.D.

There is a huge delay in Title XIX programs in Connecticut. DSS Commissioner Roderick Bremby and his lawyers are flat out liars, claiming that we did not complete our Title XIX application on behalf of our mother on 15 Dec. 2011 last year, but we did. Anyway in a companion case Briggs v. Bremby 12-CV-324 he got slammed on his Motion to Dismiss and on the legal theory itself, i.e. the Court found that there is an independent legal right under 42 U.S.C. §1983 how about that.This movie is the same as the top movie but without the Rule 11 Sanctions.Roderick Bremby up shit creek without a paddle pt. 1 -- Shafer v. Bremby 2012-CV-0039 Supplemental Memo Con...You remember how I've been telling Connecticut Federal Court Judge Alvin W. Thompson in Shafer v. Bremby, 2012-CV-00039 that Roderick Bremby was full of shit, right? You know, he and his lawyers are facing Rule 11 Sanctions for claiming that we did not complete our Title XIX Medicaid application for our mother on 15 December, 2011 when in point of fact all of the emails and logical inferences support our contention. Monsieur Bremby and lawyer Jennifer Callahan, having sold us down the river, declined to respond to the Rule 11 Safe Harbor notice so I filed our Motion two days ago. But meanwhile the shit is rising from a companion tributary: In Briggs v. Bremby, 2012-CV-00324 the Court firmly rejected his contention that the Statutory timelines to complete food stamp applications were merely guidelines and that they did not grant a private remedy. So now at this point we may not have res judicata but we do clearly have stare decisis, enough so that lead counsel in Shafer v. Bremby cited Briggs as supplemental authority. Meanwhile we are still awaiting a final determination on the fact that we are entitled to Intervene in this case because we have suffered palpable harms as a result of the malfeasance running rampant within the Bremby Administration. As a former government lawyer I tend to know when they are full of shit; I can smell it a mile away. This case stinks to high hell, but thus far instead of everyone owning up to it I got banned from attending a settlement conference and told that I could not run video on a public sidewalk.

Sorry folks but I know my rights, and we are talking about my mother here so I'm just not going to back down from any of you. I will go where I go and say what I say because I know that I'm right. And that my friends, is all that matters. If more citizens knew their rights and stood firm perhaps our beloved Country wouldn't be in the shambles it is in right now. And with that, watch for the movie soon. Happy Holidays to All. Related:The D-Snap debacle.

Today's feature presentation is loading up now so get your popcorn and truffle butter ready. Here is your back story with prior videos including testimony to the NH Committee on Redress and Grievances on mortgage foreclosure fraud, DCYF and NH Family Court abuse and more. To those of you I didn't have time to include in this short video you may want to call in to Kevin Avard's show in the second week of January, stay tuned.
Meantime I suggest you read NH Const. Article § 32.
[Art.] 32. [Rights of Assembly, Instruction, and Petition.]

The people have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer.

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:18 PM, David johnson <dwjoae@yahoo.com> wrote:Greetings,These videos clearly demonstrate that this Magistrate, BAR Attorney M. Wageling, is operating routine violations of trust law. The fact that she does so with such regularity and impunity requires some inquiry to see what the accepted procedure is in New Hampshire. It appears as if those who oppose the redress of grievances process in the General Court stand as a boundary between the people and law. This is simply not going to happen. The "mortgage" fraud occurring with this Magistrate has reached the point of null and void for her rulings. She is part one of the fraud and felony. The next part is the recent overthrow of the New Hampshire Constitution by the rogue faction within the House Committee on Rules. Almost all of the Petitions under Articles 31 & 32 are against a legislative process to have the Circuit Court Family Division operate as an equity court, which does not have rules, see Family Division Rule 1.2, and many abuses of Article 73-a. Combined abuses result in routine violations of law. Both together are not lawful. The existence of the framework is one aspect of the unrest. The one in play is usually the abusive and unlawful practice of this scenario as an excuse to run government outside the law. This is simply not allowed under constitutional law.The videos provided by Chris King create a very unique and urgent requirement. The Wageling crimes implicate corruption in the rules of the NHSJC. I'm affected by the fact that the most pressing issue at hand is for those testifying for the House Committee, to re-present the audio and video content accompanied with affidavits from those present and those making statements. These videos are indicative of crime and treason. One cannot defend such. This is a sign that New Hampshire is run by that which is not constitutional law.The Democrats are damaging their credibility by siding with the courts. That hurts their own families and constituents. Worse yet, the Democrats have chosen to aid the side of treason. They are throwing the Constitution out as if they are allowed. This is not allowed.David

*************

I did my tour of duty in New Hampshire as NAACP Legal Chair and Citizen-at-Large, winning several First Amendment battles and earning a Mayoral Commendation from the longest-sitting member of the Governor's Executive Council. I will say this: So much of what I learned in law school is complete hogwash when it comes to how the courts and government really operate and I am not afraid to publicly say it. The amount of lies, deceit and outright corruption on the mortgage side and in family courts is enough to make you sick. And who is behind this nonsense? Democrat Teri Norelli, whom I sued [snip] (that's how they do it at Daily Kos, right)....