If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Because males have a penis that hardens to the point it can penetrate orifices, it's biological fact.. No matter what a man says about himself,how trustworthy he is,or he would never DO that..regardless of all of this..he has a penis.

A penis can be used as a WEAPON. Any man that has a functioning penis potentally can decide in his own mind to use that penis as a weapon.Why?
Because biologically he CAN.
Biologically any man can potentially be a rapist to anyone with an orifice that is penetrable.

If a person has been assaulted by a penis/weapon because a male decided to use it as a weapon on a victim he chose to rape ,the victim they are scarred,for life .The traumatic scarring causes survivors to become hyper vilagent to avoid another assault.

Why? because rape traumatizes people.A symptom of trauma is hypervilagence and it is a physical and psychological reaction to being traumatized..Survivors want to warn others so others are not victimized. The motive to educate others about rape comes from compassion and desire to heal in the survivor.

If a man does not use his penis today as a weapon to invade another's orifice then today he's NOT a rapist..

Mind reading does not exist in real life. So any potential person possessing an orifice that can be penetrated by a penis/weapon is a potential rape victim.Males and Females both can become rape victims.

Rape is always a CHOICE,a choice to use a penis as a weapon to destroy another person and soothe the ego through a power trip,because rape traumatizes and destroys a person..

So if you have a penis you are male,so all men by default biologically carry a weapon.

Rape is a CHOICE made in the mind of a penis owner to use that penis as a weapon and truth is no one can read minds.

Being unable to read another persons mind means we can never know exactly what they are thinking,or deciding.

So All men who have minds that cannot be read as accurately clearly and perfectly as their own mind by another person's mind, and a penis that can get hard enough to penetrate another's' orifices,could potentially be a rapist should he choose to be a rapist.

Rape because of biology is a choice that only Males can make.

And no one can read his mind to know if he is choosing to rape or not with 100% certainty.

This was Andrea Dworkin's theory as well. Of course, by this "logic," since every woman is capable of PMS, they are all potentially unstable and should not be given any responsibility. I believe that the Saudis base their entire culture on this theory.

Ultimately, there is a kernel of truth to this, but that is the reason that we have evolved societal constraints on sexual behavior, only some of which are codified into law. When those constraints are destroyed by thoughtless Progressives who see themselves as too enlightened for such things, the end result is the unleashing of the worst of those behaviors. For a great example, look at the Occupy Wall Street camps and the permissive culture that refused to judge any behavior, and ended up requiring the establishment of guarded tents where women could sleep with less fear of rape than in the camp as a whole.

This was Andrea Dworkin's theory as well. Of course, by this "logic," since every woman is capable of PMS, they are all potentially unstable and should not be given any responsibility. I believe that the Saudis base their entire culture on this theory.

Ultimately, there is a kernel of truth to this, but that is the reason that we have evolved societal constraints on sexual behavior, only some of which are codified into law. When those constraints are destroyed by thoughtless Progressives who see themselves as too enlightened for such things, the end result is the unleashing of the worst of those behaviors. For a great example, look at the Occupy Wall Street camps and the permissive culture that refused to judge any behavior, and ended up requiring the establishment of guarded tents where women could sleep with less fear of rape than in the camp as a whole.

Or, you could take this to the level of extremist Islam and justify putting women in burkas to allegedly protect them from male lust.

Not every man is a potential rapist just because he has a penis. Rape is not a crime of lust, it is a crime of violence, motivated by a need on the rapist's part to have power over the victim. That's why rapists need to be locked up for long sentences, instead of "chemical castration" or actual castration. A person does not need a penis to rape another person.

Or, you could take this to the level of extremist Islam and justify putting women in burkas to allegedly protect them from male lust.

Not every man is a potential rapist just because he has a penis. Rape is not a crime of lust, it is a crime of violence, motivated by a need on the rapist's part to have power over the victim. That's why rapists need to be locked up for long sentences, instead of "chemical castration" or actual castration. A person does not need a penis to rape another person.

That's certainly the MSW mantra, however it oversimplifies reality by omitting that there is indeed an element of sexual gratification to it for the perp, and the fact that both dominance and submission are involved in some non-pathological level in a vast number of normal, consensual sexual relationships. It's a great social tool for validating victims and marking perps for shaming and casting-out, but it's an incomplete paradigm of reality.