Link List

Friday, December 9, 2016

The Evolution of Buttfaces Explained

While I was very very pregnant about two years ago, I posted something on this blog and then took it down the same day.

It was a labor of love and admiration for BAHfest. I didn't believe it was worthy of submission to the judges, but I thought it was worth sharing here.

But then, even given all the silliness I've posted here over seven years of mermaid-hood, seeing my b.a.h. in print was too much for me to bear and bare. Hence the embarrassment and why I took it down.

Because rear ends serve a big purpose in the chimp world. Female chimps’ buttocks grow redder and swollen when they are ovulating, signaling to males that it’s business time. And it’s important to know whose bottom it is, in part to prevent inbreeding. The buttocks have, in scientific parlance, a “high socio-sexual signaling function.”

But when we began walking upright, our bottoms became fleshier and no longer broadcast our ovulation status, possibly to discourage casual hookups in favor of pairing up and sticking together for the children’s sake. On the other hand, humans — “especially females,” the researchers write — developed ruddier and thicker lips, as well as fattier faces.

So not only are chimpanzees better at recognizing butts and worse at recognizing faces than we are, which is interesting in its own right. But this suggests that our faces function like our ancestors' butts!

Bummer? Yes and no. On the one hand, this makes my "bad ad hoc hypothesis," re-posted below, worthy of sharing without any more embarrassment. Butt on the other hand, it means it's no longer bad enough to make BAHfest. So, instead of working on this one some more, I need to come up with an entirely new one from scratch if I'm going to have a shot at ever participating.

Butt before I go back to the drawing board (with my hot glue gun, see below), here's that old post. Like that recent news story, it's about butts driving the evolution of primate faces. In this case we're focusing on rainbow-colored monkey butts, but the theories may be liberally applied to this idea that human faces are functionally ancestral hominin butts. OK! Enjoy?

***

“No
other member in the whole class of mammals is coloured in so extraordinary a
manner as the adult male mandrill.” ~ Charles
Darwin, The Descent of Man, 1874

Darwin was famously
astonished by the extraordinary coloration of the mandrill monkey, Mandrillus
sphinx. Because males are more striking than females, evolutionary
explanations have focused on the adult male. And, as the thinking goes, it's
the adult male face that's been the primary focus of selection, with duller
female faces and the colorful rumps of both sexes being secondary, in
evolutionary terms.

One explanation for the colorful male mandrill face is sexual selection. Males
with healthy, robust physiologies capable of building and maintaining that
rainbow visage are the sexiest. And because coloration isn't as pronounced in
females, that's an indication that it's less crucial for their reproductive success.
But their ability to choose male mates based on good looks is, and the
particular genetic mechanism which beautifies the male carries some of that
beauty along in females. So that sufficiently, albeit vaguely, explains the
mandrill face.

But for many of us an
even more urgent question is, Why did the mandrill rump evolve to
resemble the face?

And there are a few
possible answers.

There's the more-is-better explanation: those with colorful faces are
seen, socially and sexually, as all right, but those with colorful faces and butts
are all that. They're the real peacocks of the troop.

There's also a potential social benefit to being visible and, better yet,
identifiable, both coming and going in the dark dense forests
where mandrills live.

Then there's a strength-in-numbers sort of idea, where other groups or
predators, even, will see twice as many of you.

Alternatively, the development of rump color could be genetically linked
to face color, so it could simply be an accidental byproduct of selection on
the face.

But what if we flip our view around and assume that the monkeys' rainbow hinies
are the primary focus of selection? After all, we find
colorful bums and privates across the primates, and in both males and females,
and in species without much to match on the face. (Yet.) This alternative
perspective could free us to arrive at the real explanation for mandrill
coloration.

And this means we should ask, Why did the mandrill face evolve to
resemble the rump?

Dear Reader, I'm sure you can think up all sorts of advantages to having a face
that looks like a butt.

For instance, by appearing to groom your ass, rather than eat food, you might
not attract competitors to your precious food source.

And there's always the Handicap Principle: He’s got a face
like a butt, but he’s still got it going on. And if males are choosy
(it's possible!) it could go the other way too.

It's possible that having basically two rear-ends causes confusion, on the part
of the male, during copulation, that can accidentally lead to some innovative,
pleasurable positions that strengthen social bonds.

Relatedly, having a face like a bum could be a nice way for females to test
male intelligence and choose procreative partners accordingly: If he
can't distinguish which end is the business end, then no way am I making this
transaction.

There's great possibility that this coloration is a sort of
menage-a-trompe-de-l'oeil. Females are more attractive if they're not one but
two! And to any onlookers, this threesome is quite impressive.

It could be as simple as mandrills getting along better with mandrills with
faces that look like butts because that's just, pure and simple, the very best
part of a mandrill, to a mandrill. This applies beyond the sexual and into the
general social realm.

One, some, or all of the above hypotheses, and many others that I'm sure you've
already thought of, could easily explain mandrill face coloration. But I now
offer what I think is the best rump-first-then-face explanation of them
all.

When it comes to
infants, selection pressures are on hyper-drive, so our adaptive hypotheses
about babies are essentially iron-clad. Nature’s got to get infancy right for
evolution to continue and nature’s got a genius way to get it right in mandrills
and it’s why mandrills are colored the way they are.

Mandrill face coloration is an adaptation to infant perception.

As mandrill neonates slowly emerge from their mothers’ bodies during
parturition, they are gobsmacked by the electric coloration of her rump.

Photo of mandrill birth was unavailable.

Sure, female mandrill
rump coloration is not as striking as males', but imagine if it's the first real color you ever saw... ever.
So, from a neonate's perspective, this welcome to the world is probably as
striking as the healthiest mandrill males' tookus is to other mandrill adults,
and to us.

Think about how much we as primates love colors. If you saw that booty upon your earthly arrival, you'd be
enchanted. You'd want to keep looking at it, wouldn't you?

And if it weren’t for the mother’s colorful face proximal to her teats,
mandrill infants would be dangerously inclined to literally hang around at the gorgeous yet abysmal end of their only source of food and social development. Food
and social boding are, of course, requirements for primate life.

The colorful bum, alone, is just too distracting. So, mothers with colorful faces to match their butts have more success nursing their infants, and thus
have more surviving offspring, that go on to have surviving offspring, than
others. They can even get away with those plain whitish nipples because their
faces are so enticing.

So that explains mandrill female faces but what about the male rumps and
faces? Especially since they’re even more colorful?

This crucial and intense early experience, which selects for colorful mother’s
faces, affects mandrill phenotypic preference throughout their lives.

All social and sexual realms are better with color because of the experiences of these individuals
born to colorful bums and raised by moms with colorful faces. Colorful
males are adaptive in this situation because youngsters fall in love with how
they look too, ingratiating themselves with what could be a killing machine,
softening his heart and preventing him from ending lineages of mothers with
colorful faces who birth babies through their colorful places.

And this could explain,
in turn, why male faces look so much like male genitalia but also why male faces look so much like female genitalia, especially at their
peak attractiveness. (See photo of fertile female's rump,
above.) Males with these features are attractive to other males, which promotes group cohesion and reduces tension and competition. Likewise males with these
features are attractive to females because it makes them more like their mothers and sisters, that is, not just beautiful but less threatening.

So that first splash of color that neonatal mandrills experienced is such a
technicolor Oz, that they grow up preferring not just color but the most
electric adults out there… Runaway selection at its finest!

To test whether the rump or the face is the driving phenotype…

Dye the butt fur of
all the mandrills to match the rest of their olive-colored bodies. All future
mandrill babies will be born to a mother's dull rump. And then if selection is
relaxed on the face coloration, as predicted by the rump-first
approach, mutations should take over and remove the color from the face.
Then next, stop dying the butt fur of the mandrills and selection should
bring back the colorful face again. Unfortunately this will only answer the
question as to which end, the face or the bum, is driving the appearance of the
other.

But remember, one of the
most compelling aspects of the Perinatal Imprinting hypothesis is that it
cannot be proven wrong, even if other explanations are better supported.

Concluding Remarks

Not only is adaptive
coloration of the mandrill face secondary to the primary adaptive value of the
coloration of the butt, but the adaptive coloration of the males is actually
secondary to the primary adaptive value of the coloration in the females!

Colorful female rumps, and the infants who love them, are responsible for the
extraordinary coloration of mandrills, not competitions for sexiest male. Everyone, especially Darwin,
was thinking about this all wrong!

***

P.S.

I recently donated
to Arkive because I heavily rely on it for teaching,
writing, and learning. I hope that if you use it like I do, that you'll do the
same so that it continues to thrive as a resource.

My infantile hypothesis follows in the tradition of the wonderfully infantile ones to be born at Bahfest exemplified by this one from organizer Zach Weinersmith and also last year's winning hypothesis from Tomer Ullman. (2016 note: Dates are off because this note was written in 2014)

Comments

We always welcome comments, but we moderate them to reduce spam, gratuitous unkindness and so forth. Because we moderate comments, they won't appear on the blog until one of us publishes them, but we try to do that in a timely way.

We've had to make a change to the commenting page. People had told us that Blogger was eating their comments, so now, rather than embedding comment editing with the posts, it has to be done on a separate, full page. Unfortunately, the 'reply' option has disappeared so comments will just follow one another. We'll see how this goes.