Saturday, September 30, 2006

Both American and Canadian fighters were deployed to intercept & closely follow the Russian bombers.

Russia advised NORAD beforehand that the bombers would be conductind an exercise "in the region".

But the bombers entered the 20-KM buffer zone around US airspace, prompting the interception. The Russian pilots either made a stupid error or were following orders to get too close for comfort, perhaps as a test of NORAD defences.

Too close for comfort. There was no reason to get so close, unless Russia has Cold-War-type plans all over again. I've been watching Russian military developments and am very concerned about Russia's attitude, in addition to their consistent support for and alliance with the Axis nations. I recall early on in the Bush presidency an American Air Force non-attack plane was forced to land in China just because it erred into Chinese airspace, leading to China seizing the plane and detaining its crew.Compare and contrast that aggressive Chinese behavior with that of North America. The Chinese stripped and studied the high-tech American plane whereas we merely "escorted" the Russian bombers and saw them on their way.The left, however, owing to its nonthinking ideological extremism, won't realize the differences and will continue to see America and the Free World as evil and imperialistic compared to the NonFree World despite our civil, if defensive, actions in this incident.

Friday, September 29, 2006

Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore warned hundreds of U.N. diplomats and staff on Thursday evening about the perils of climate change, claiming: Cigarette smoking is a "significant contributor to global warming!"

(...)

"The planet itself will do nicely, thank you very much what is at risk is human civilization," Gore said. After a series of Q& A with the audience, which had little to do with global warming and more about his political future, Annan bid "adios" to Gore.

Then, Gore had his staff opened a stack of cardboard boxes to begin selling his new book, "An Inconvenient Truth, The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It," $19.95, to the U.N. diplomats.

Hey, Al, you talking is also a significant contributor to global warming! All that carbon dioxide and heat you emit just for the purpose of hearing yourself speak!

And what's the matter with you... using the UN as a bookselling opportunity?! Is that distinguished? Is that statesmanlike? Oh, wait... the UN is corrupt anyway. It's been hijacked by money-worshippers and butcherous tyrants, so what's wrong, therefore, with some idiot selling a few fiction novels?

• U.K.: Government workers in West Midlands were told to remove or cover all pig-related items, including a tissue box depicting Winnie the Pooh and Piglet, after a Muslim took offense. An official called it "tolerance of people's beliefs." Meanwhile, a Bristol man had to remove a "porking yard" sign at his pub under a local court's "Anti-Social Behavior Order" for offending Muslims.• France: Police denied anti-Semitism was the motive in the kidnap-murder of a young Jewish man by a Muslim immigrant who demanded the victim's family raise a ransom from a synagogue.• Germany: The EU ordered Oktoberfest barmaids serving beer to stop wearing traditional low-cut blouses with dirndls, as a sunburn protection measure. Outraged locals said it was a bid to appease Muslim sensibilities. The order was later rescinded.• Norway: Norwegians must mount proof of their own innocence if Muslim immigrants accuse them of discrimination in any form, including speech, according to a new Discrimination Act.

The example from Norway is perhaps the worst of all. Apparently in Norway, Kaffirs [non-Muslims] are deemed guilty until they prove themselves innocent when accused by Muslims.Astonishing. How would the Muslims react if an Act were passed deeming Muslims guilty of discrimination until they prove themselves innocent of accusations by Kaffirs of discrimination in any form?We don't have to change to suit any immigrants. Our country, like the ones they came from, is the way it is, to be accepted as is, if one is to be accepted thereinto. If one doesn't like it here, then tough. Either accept your new country, obey its laws and norms, or go home. After all, wherever you came from, that's likely the way it is, too. If I were to emigrate to your country, I'd have to follow its laws and norms or suffer whatever consequences as prescribed by your authorities. For example, if I were to move to Saudi Arabia and was caught with alcohol, there'd be serious consequences. If I was caught stealing a loaf of bread, they'd cut off a hand and a foot of mine from opposite sides... as required under Sharia Law. If someone in your country is discovered to be homosexual, they're executed. Therefore, you can bloody well understand that you are to accept our ways and fit in just like everyone else. You will not impose your values on us, for this is our country and this is the way things are, after all. You don't come here and suddenly have the authority to order us all around!Norway has a discriminatory double standard against non-Muslims, which is proof, therefore, that Norway is a Dhimmi country. Norway will eventually, therefore, be overtaken by Islam. They've already hammered the first nail into the coffin of their national sovereignty, to eventually be surrendered to the rule of the Koran. Shame on Norway!

Members of the Francophonie summit have agreed to a compromise on a contentious resolution after Prime Minister Stephen Harper blocked the original proposal. The original wording of the resolution recognized Lebanon's suffering in this summer's 34-day conflict, but not Israel's. Harper took a strong stance against the Egyptian-proposed resolution which most of the 72 members supported. He urged the organization to recognize the suffering of both nations. (...)"They spent much of the afternoon at the conference table re-drafting a resolution with the wording Harper wanted," said CTV's Rosemary Thompson reporting from the summit.

That's Canada's new Prime Minister, Stephen Harper. Standing up for Israel. Against majority (Dhimmi) international opinion. And getting Canada's way in favor of Israel.Canada's Stephen Harper is a real leader, both here at home and in the world.This is something Canada hasn't seen in a long time, perhaps not to such an extent, ever.Thanks to Mr. Harper, Canada is once again a real, serious, active player on the world stage. We're leading the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan and winning. We're influencing the world in their views.Canadians can be proud. Very proud. Of their country and their new prime minister.O Canada!

"In Chapter 1 of my book," Kupelian said, "I reported howprofessional broadcast news journalists at a NLGJA event advocated that, when reporting on homosexual issues, journalists shouldn't even bother to interview people holding to the traditional Judeo-Christian viewpoint. That is, rather than dignify the biblical viewpoint as worthy of inclusion by the press, it should be treated the same way the media treat the Ku Klux Klan."

"Some people thought I was exaggerating," said Kupelian. "Well, now the president of the organization is coming out and making it official: According to 'gay' members of the establishment press, when reporting on homosexuality journalists should just stop interviewing people like James Dobson or D. James Kennedy or any other traditionalist espousing a biblical perspective."

The gay organization in question has said even worse about anyone who would dare oppose the gay agenda. Read the whole thing to find out more.I thought gays were supposed to be these very nice, pleasant, minding-their-own-business-not-hurting-anyone sort of people who were tolerant of everyone. Now it seems that increasingly this isn't the case at all. It seems that there are gays in the media who advocate intolerance of anyone, particularly JudeoChristian folks, who just don't happen to believe in homosexuality. So much for "freedom of the press". So much for "fair and balanced".(Interesting that the gays never seem to rip into Muslims, who also are opposed to homosexuality, many of whom so opposed as to firmly believe that gays must be executed simply for being that way. Why don't the gay militants therefore attack Islamists too? Afraid of making them so mad they'll get themselves beheaded? Oh, I see... the gays only go after the peaceful JudeoChristians as they're a much easier target for hate and intolerance which is obviously harbored by some gays, like the journalist ones in question)Hey, gay folks: don't you understand what Islam says about you? Don't you understand what devout Muslims think about you? Why only attack JudeoChristians?! Do YOU discriminate? I see no reason not to believe so.Hypocrites.Which leads us to the matter of a new kind of terrorist: gay terrorists:Gay Activist Starts Fire in Colorado Family's Front YardPolice call it a hate crime

For Christina Sewall, this incident is eye-opening evidence of the appalling lack of "tolerance" among those who advocate the gay agenda. "How is this being tolerant. They set our lawn on fire?" Sewall asked. "We're not preaching hate, but they are the ones doing the violence."(...)"There is some fear and some concern there," she said. "But, it also makes me want to stand up all the more, because we are not the ones preaching intolerance."No part of me believes that we are the only ones who feel this way, so why isn't everybody else who's feeling this way standing up?"

Is this ok? Is it ok for people to commit violence just because they don't like when others have a different point of view?This family's only crime was to speak out in favor of keeping marriage exactly as it has always been: between a man and a woman. They do not deserve to be targeted for violence by such hateful extremists.And a warning to leftists: don't be stupid. You people are infamous for all sorts of intolerance, refusal to open your mind to others' differences and to understand them. You falsely accuse people of "hate" and "bigotry", amongst other slurs, believing that you're right just because you tell each other you're right. You validate each other's delusions and myopic worldviews. Only your views and the views of your favored peoples are valid; all other views are not and are therefore subject to strong, even violent, opposition. So be warned: any sign of intolerance or hatred coming from you will result in automatic deletion of such commentary and in your being banned. I take no lessons from leftist hypocrites.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

The trigger for the explosion of opinion? A decision in the local district that schoolboys must sit on toilet seats when urinating, not stand.

According to the news report, the rule was announced for boys at Dvergsnes School, prompting outrage from Vidar Kleppe, the chief of The Democrats Party.

He's accusing the school of "fiddling with God's work,"(...)

On Kleppe's contentious "stand" on making political waves, no comment was the response from school principal Lise Gjul.

But she did tell Norwegian Broadcasting NRK that the restrooms are used by both boys and girls, and the young boys are not "good enough at aiming" in order to have "a pleasant toilet."

Oh, I see... the principal is a woman. What does she understand about being a boy? And why not install urinals? Too cheap, Madame Principal? Besides, if boys whiz on the seats, boys have to sometimes sit on 'em, too, for nombre deux.

Why doesn't the stupid school instead issue an order that when going weewee, boys must first lift the seat out of the way to avoid giving it the golden-shower treatment, thus alleviating the problem?

Stupid, male-bashing, feminazi supremacist principal. Telling boys to sit down for number one?!

It's the nature of boys to whiz standing up. How dare a woman tell us how to go peepee? We're not telling them they have to stand if they don't want to.

"When you make those kinds of decisions as a prime minister, you have to be able to take responsibility for them and stick with them," Harper said in Bucharest."The fact that Mr. Martin is unable to do that, in this and so many other cases, illustrates why he is no longer prime minister of our country."In an interview with the Toronto Star, Martin said he doesn't back away "one iota" from his decision to send soldiers to Kandahar. But Martin said there should be more focus on reconstruction efforts."You can't win the military war if you can't win the hearts and minds of the people," Martin said.

Doesn't Paul Martin sound just like John Kerry? Another leftist politician who once supported a mission and then crapped all over it out of sheer stupidity and caving in to pressure from the left.It's impossible to "reconstruct" when you have the Taliban destroying everything you reconstruct all the time. Therefore you need the military focus to first eliminate the Taliban. Forget about "sitting at a table" with the Taliban. These people aren't even people; they're bloodthirsty monsters with no regard for human life whatsoever. Nevertheless, leftists want to delusionally tell themselves that these "people", the Taliban, can be reasoned with.Leftists... so incredibly stupid and delusional. Stupid, delusional people shouldn't be elected to positions of power in the first place, like Paul Martin was.Thank goodness that poophead isn't prime minister anymore. If he was, two provinces would probably be in the process of separating, unable to tolerate a Liberal-controlled federation any longer. And Canada would've abandoned Afghanistan, enabling the Taliban to retake the country and allow Osama bin Laden to return and continue training more Al Qaeda homicide pilots and shoe bombers. And that'd all be bad, bad, bad! But does Paul Martin understand this? Hell, no!Paul Martin should go back into his hole in the ground and stay there.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Belinda Stronach has not denied having sexual relations with ex-NHLer Tie Domi.

"I'm not going to comment at this point in time whether it's true, it's false or it's just the opinions of others," Stronach said. "I'm not prepared to talk about my personal life at this moment."

Interesting. She doesn't say, "I did not have sexual relations with that man... Mr. Domi". Why? The reasonable person realizes that she can see the folly of such denial, owing to what happened with her other "friend", Bill Clinton, who lied when he denied. Obviously there was some naughtiness going on between Bel and Tie, otherwise they'd both deny it all.

Belinda also claims that if she was a guy, the whole thing wouldn't be made a big deal out of. She claims a "double standard".

Bullshit.

A male politician who commits adultery with a married woman and causes a divorce- she's telling us that it wouldn't be all over the news? That folks wouldn't find it the least bit interesting, despite the fact that he's an elected public official? Yeah, suuuure.

Heeere's Belinda. Trying to weasel and squirm her way out of unethical, immoral conduct which contributed to a divorce... by saying, "hey, I'm a chick... gimme a break!"

Yep, as long as one is a girl, one can do whatever one wants and no one has any right to think anything negative about any personal misconduct on her part at all... and anyone who believes Belinda was wrong to have done such a thing, if indeed she did (looks that way- she doesn't deny it), is therefore a male chauvinist pig or a bigot or a mean-spirited, vindictive something...

Lookit, Belinda, you've been a bad girl. If I was a bad boy, there'd be consequences. Therefore there should be consequences for you, too. And as a politician, you're going to have to put up with the crap you're going to take just like anyone else would, like your good buddy Slick Willy!

I also won't let her off the hook for being a leftist. No longer is it ok to misbehave using one's gonads! Leftists cannot be allowed to make it so that one can go around just fooling around with anyone, anywhere, anytime... else, next thing we know some judge will strike down the age-of-consent law and children everywhere will be victimized by immoral adults. And that'd be a terrible, deleterious thing for society. (Slippery slope, remember? All the pro-gay rulings in the Nineties- it was warned that they'd lead to gay marriage. The left ridiculed such warnings. And then the left forced gay marriage into law. Now it looks like polygamy is the next step...)

Don't think of it on only a case-by-case, individual basis. If folks are going around behaving like Bel and Tie and wrecking Tie's marriage (does he have kids? if so, they'll be hurt, too), then society as a whole will suffer. And it'll just keep getting worse, owing to a general breakdown of morals, norms, discipline, etc...

We should be taking a broad perspective on this stuff. Belinda and Tie are part of a larger problem in society and we cannot just say, "ah, who cares? It's private stuff anyway". But "private" stuff can affect the whole as more and more folks see that it's ok to do that kind of wrong "private" stuff.

And more and more folks will be hurt as a result of such a cavalier attitude towards infidelity in relationships. Especially children!

(Not that the left understands, or cares, about this anyway. That's why they cannot be allowed to be in charge. It's like handing out matches in a kindergarten when putting leftists in charge of society.)

If Tie likes Belinda and not his wife, then he should've gotten a divorce before screwing the bimbo!

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Story here. h/t: BreitbartUS National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice contradicts Bill Clinton's claim, made when he went moonbatshit during a recent Fox News interview.

Clinton said he had "battle plans" drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban and launch a full-scale search for bin Laden.But Rice, who was national security advisor at the time of the September 11 attacks, strongly disagreed with Clinton's version of events during an interview on Monday with the New York Post."We were not left a comprehensive strategy to fight al Qaeda," Rice said in a transcript of her comments released by the State Department."For instance, big pieces were missing, like an approach to Pakistan that might work, because without Pakistan you weren't going to get Afghanistan," Rice said.

Sounds like yet another example, amongst countless others, of typical liberal incompetence and cavalier indifference towards real, critically serious matters.Ms. Rice refused to call Mr. Clinton a liar, but she did allude to Billy's perhaps-contrived lost-mind fury, perhaps intending to highlight the forcefulness which liberals are infamous for utilizing to attempt to, via Machiavellian psychological manipulation tactics, impress upon people that they're telling the truth even when they're either exaggerating, embellishing, telling half-truths or just plain old lying .Bill Clinton is a walking shadow, a poor player who struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more. It's a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.Bloody liberals...

Monday, September 25, 2006

Above: Former Democratic U.S. President Bill Clinton, left (in every sense of the word), and some other guy pissing away a chance to kill Al Qaeda head Osama bin Laden

Moving back in time, two days after 9/11, this article appeared:Story here. h/t: NewMediaJournal

Military strikes were aimed at bin Laden once before. After U.S. embassies were bombed in Africa three years ago, Washington retaliated with a missile attack in August 1998, sending more than 70 Tomahawk cruise missiles into eastern Afghanistan targeting training camps operated by bin Laden.

But they didn't get Bin Laden.Then in December 2000, Clinton had the opportunity to "try", as he furiously swore he did in a recent interview on Fox News which has the media and bloggers saying he basically lost his cool, to put it mildly.But then he chose not to even "try".

Officials said the December meeting was the most pointed in a series of discussions over several months. Several officials familiar with the debate said top military and national security officials convened in the White House to discuss the options.

One individual familiar with the discussions, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the meeting was prompted by "eyes-on intelligence" about bin Laden's whereabouts — a term used to indicate a human or satellite spotting.

Military officials presented a possible military strike option, and the pros and cons were debated.

Among the concerns voiced was whether the intelligence wasn't already stale given bin Laden's tendency to move quickly and go into hiding. There also was discussion of possible collateral damage if such an attack occurred.

Ultimately, the president and aides decided not to strike. Berger and one other official said military officials never made a formal recommendation to proceed with the attack.

"What's human sacrifice," he asked, "if not sending guys off to Iraq for no reason?"

"No reason"? That's it; I'm saying Mel's lost it for sure! I thought he was going to see a shrink or something after his crazy utterances about Jews when he was picked up for drunk driving? Did he have a few before saying such a dumb thing?

Sigh... celebrities...

But I bet leftists will suddenly like him all over again... if they had stopped at all. After all, leftists are mad, too...

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Former Liberal prime minister of Canada Paul Martin, above, has been sighted and photographed by a Canadian hiking in the woods. This is significant because Canadians haven't seen hide nor hair of him since he ignominiously lost power and resigned as Liberal leader.

Rumors are abuzz in the media about his latest wardrobe. Why is he dressed like that? How much weight did he put on? How did he lose so much of his hair so quickly?

What a mysterious sighting.

Below, a reader sent in this photograph believed to be another Paul Martin sighting:

What's that he's wearing? Fur jammies?

Below: a photograph believed to be of Paulie taking a swim...

Er... that appears to be his arm... his head is apparently underwater... but the boater who sent in the photograph swears it looked just like Paulie himself...

"(Canada's support) means a lot to us," Karzai told a slightly bemused woman. "For the taxpayers' money that you send, for the soldiers that you send, your sons and daughters - they help us immensely."

"Merci mille fois," he added, using the French expression for "thank you, a thousand times."

(...)

Several thousand people rallied on Parliament Hill on Friday, shortly after Karzai addressed the House of Commons, to show their support for the 2,300 Canadian soldiers serving in Afghanistan.

But, on the other side: the left:

It was a somewhat different scene outside the downtown hotel where Karzai was staying. About 35 anti-war protesters staged a demonstration and at least one person was arrested.

Some of the demonstrators wore masks, one burned an American flag, and there was some pushing and shoving between police and protesters.

The Canadian leftists might've reminded President Karzai of the Taliban or supporters thereof. Oh, well, every country has its moonbats, after all...

But contrast the thousands who supported the troops with the 35 who made absolute fools of themselves... Masks? Flag-burning? Violence against police? In the street? In the city? In Canada? Par for the course for moonbats anywhere on the planet. A fact of life... and it's unfortunate that they, in the Free World, fail to appreciate that, unlike in the non-Free World, they don't get shot, hanged, tortured, raped or beheaded for speaking their minds in public, however messed-up they may be.

Forget about all the babble in the mainstream media over the controversy stemming from a claim by somebody from Saudi Arabia that Al Qaeda head Osama Bin Laden has died of some illness. It has all the look and smell of yet another hoax about OBL's death.Well... here's an exclusive, via the Northeast Intelligence Network and the Canada Free Press.Story here. (Emphasis mine)

You can’t believe all the news that’s originated from Saudi sources, printed in French newspapers, and broadcast on major news outlets throughout the U. S., Canada, and Europe.That’s the word from Hamid Mir, Osama bin Laden’s official biographer and the only journalist to interview the elusive al Qaeda emir in the wake of 9/11.(...)In an exclusive release to the Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press, Mr. Mir called the report was “rubbish” and said that it represented “old wine in an new bottle,” an apparent allusion to Congressman Curt Weldon’s statement last March to The Philadelphia Inquirer that bin Laden had died in Iran.Mir maintains that bin Laden is alive, well, and living the lawless frontier of Pakistan. He says that the al Qaeda leader completed his plans for an “American Hiroshima” - - a nuclear attack on major metropolitan areas throughout the U. S. and has gained the approval of some Muslim scholars to kill millions of American civilians.

Ominously:

Mir says that Adnan el Shukrijumah, the al Qaeda agent who has been singled out by bin Laden to commandeer the American Hiroshima, has been given orders “to increase the level and the scope” of the attack.

Same report is at Canada Free Press.You know, many folks criticize the Bush administration, the FBI, CIA, etc. for having "ignored" all sorts of signs that something like 9/11 was going to happen.Well, guess what? I'm not ignoring any signs. I'm blogging about them all the time. To hell with my critics, who could care less for national security.Many more are also not ignoring the information we're hearing that there's going to be an attack on the United States, worse than 9/11, and that it's expected to be nuclear in nature.On the other hand, there's plenty of folks who believe that there's no chance whatsoever of such a thing happening. These folks are pure ideologues and are delusional. They ignore reality.But if this "American Hiroshima" or another attack happens inside the USA or Canada, which have been spared any major attack since 9/11, those same folks will deny that they were ignorant of the signs of imminent jihad. They'll do a complete about-face and blame the authorities for not doing enough to prevent it. Incredible... these folks, who, since 9/11, have demanded that the authorities do effectively nothing at all (no "profiling", no wiretaps, no arresting clearly-would-be jihadists, no imprisoning captured jihadists, no taking the war overseas to where the jihadists are and so on) will blame the attack, again, on the victim.Oh, and a reminder: I have declared a "war on trolls", have, in my mind, expanded the definition of what is a troll and will use my own, rightful judgement with extreme prejudice in dealing with trolls. So anyone with malicious intent or anyone who merely wishes to issue criticism against me right here on my blog rather than on their own... can expect what they bring upon themselves, like deletion or even worse.After all, this is NOT a forum for Dhimmitude nonsense.

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Related: Clinton points finger back at Bush on non-capture of Bin Laden.Heh... them moonbats hate it when the truth about them comes out! Getting mad as hell on TV isn't going to impress anyone.He blames "right wingers" for everything being said about him these days. Heh... just like his wife: "Vast, Right-wing Conspiracy" Hillary.Oh, yeah... dismiss all critics as "right-wing". That'll really impress reasonable folks... suuure!He claims he "tried" and "failed". Oh, did he really try? I guess we'll never know, unless the Senate "Intelligence" Committee musters the intelligence to find any proof that Slick Willy ever "tried". All I hear is that he didn't care about Al Qaeda. He was more interested in his willy and some bimbo in a blue dress with a white spot on it.He can make all the claims he wants... but why should we believe a man we know to be a liar?Oh, please, Billy... just put that little thing back into your pants and zip up! Geez... what a pervert! What a moonbat!Hmm... shades of Saddam... always doing the same unhinged-liar thing in court... blaming Bush, too, for his troubles... oh, and Slick Willy didn't have the balls to remove Saddam. Did he try to? Betcha he'll claim yes!But Willy didn't get Saddam. Bush did. At least Bush got somebody. He got a lot of Al Qaeda bigwigs, too, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (the planner of 9/11), Al-Zarqawi, etc...

Billy merely whipped out his willy and lied about it...heeeeere's Billy!

The Associated Press, Reuters and many other news organizations reported that a few thousand people took part in a protest against the war in Iraq near the United Nations headquarters on Wednesday.But the mainstream media ignored another, much larger rally taking place outside the U.N., with an estimated 35,000 people expressing their support for Israel and condemning Iranian President Mamoud Ahmadinejad.The main speakers at the rally in Dag Hammerskold Plaza included U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton, who told the cheering, flag-waving crowd that the Bush administration "would not hesitate” to pursue financial sanctions against Iran if it proceeds with its nuclear program.Noble laureate Elie Wiesel chastised the U.N. for welcoming Ahmadinejad, saying: "A man who brings shame to the world has no place anywhere. He must be excluded from all groups of international nations,” according to the New York Sun, one of only a handful of newspapers that gave the rally any coverage at all.

Read it for yourself.Screw the UN, which has become a stand-up comedy club for murderous fascists like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez. They put on a ridiculous, hateful performance for the entertainment of those representing other evil, non-human-rights-respecting regimes (which the left insanely loves so much) which have hijacked the UN and its agenda and direction, rendering it not merely utterly useless, but also a harmful entity.And screw the MSM. Need I say why? They're without a doubt anti-America, anti-Israel, pro-Islamofascism, pro-communist, etc, etc.And screw the left, too! The leftists just don't like me and my blog. Good! That inspires me to continue doing what I do as The Canadian Sentinel! Hear me roar!Who would you rather be listening to and having a dialogue with, the UN/MSM or folks like me with these honest, hard-hitting blogs which carefully scrutinize the real world and don't hold back on posting what we find and giving our uncensored, unfiltered point of view thereon?Oh, yes... of course: Hey, moonbat leftists (you know bloody well who you are; don't play dumb [oh, wait- you are dumb!]): you ugly, malevolent crapheads can go screw yourselves!Finally, but most critically, screw the Islamofascists, the communists and their Axis bum buddies!

Now here's some cartoons to help put forth my point just in case I wasn't clear:

No, the lady with the finger isn't me. I just got 'er off the internet. I'm a thirty-something guy. I just like her attitude. She would know how to deal with the kind of unruly, spoiled brats I'm talking about when I mention "leftists".

Joseph Bagley, 26, was arrested Friday morning at his apartment in Indianapolis. Police say they found chemicals, equipment, gas masks, air purification masks and unlabeled jars of chemicals and powders in Bagley's apartment. Police also saw soldering equipment in plain view, as well as batteries taped together, wires and putty material attached to a metal tube.

(...)

The apartment complex manager told police that a carpet cleaner contractor had written a note saying that Bagley's apartment looked like a "terrorist cell." Police say they found literature about Al Qaeda in Bagley's apartment, as well as books on Muslim names, understanding United States documents and about Saddam Hussein's bomb maker.

Maybe racial profiling is becoming less useful over time, as white moonbats like this crazy/evil carrot-topped kid seem to be following in the shadow of the Al Qaeda beast...

Authorities will have to continuously adapt to the changing threat environment. Guess us white-looking folks are going to be targeted now... oh, well, that's equality... all kinds of folks are now fecking jihadists, so nobody's immune to racial profiling... so the left can just shut up... because as long as white folks get profiled, anybody can be profiled!

Next thing we hear, some albino lesbian Hare Krishnas will be arrested for wearing bomb belts in a Pizza Hut in San Francisco...

Friday, September 22, 2006

Let's go over to Rebekah's Placewhere Rebekah tells us about her interview (well, it could've happened) with a crazed Islamofascist named Ahmed about his rage and the Pope's recent speech.I'm sure you'll find Ahmed to be a rather pleasant fellow...

Ahmadinejad said Annan had told him Iran could ignore a Security Council resolution requiring the country to cease enriching uranium by Aug. 31 or face economic sanctions.(...)A spokesman for Annan said that was not the case, though, and Annan "did not tell Iran to disregard" the resolution.

Story here.Wow! Excellent! Now that's better!And the MSM was trying to brainwash Canadians into believing that there wasn't any support for Canada's military, particularly those serving in Afghanistan in the cause of freedom, democracy and the rule of law.What a staggering, devastating, humbling blow to the left, who are dead set against Canada doing anything to fight for freedom, democracy and the rule of law, all things enjoyed (and abused) by leftists, who think they somehow magically preexisted humanity and are as natural as the air, the ground and the sea, never for a moment thinking that freedom, democracy and the rule of law actually only exist because those who want to have these things fight wars against those who start or will start them in attempts to take them away from us.Oh, those leftists... incredibly stupid, astonishingly deluded... may God bless those pathetic wretches!God bless Canada!

Gayle of My Republican Blog has an extremely funny post up today about cows and what would be done with them by different political/economic systems all over the world.Go check it out.Heh.But if leftists plan to troll into the comments there, don't even bother. Gayle moderates comments and deletes moonbatty ones without batting an eyelash.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

...but things will be a bit different from now on.The Sentinel has just recovered from being Pearl Harbored by the enemy and has learned some very valuable lessons, which will be applied when dealing with comments.Y'all know what? The whole thing doesn't cost me a cent, after all, so why should I worry about a few ugly, forked-tongued trolls? They can be ignored, deleted and sometimes blocked. No need to let it get to me. Trolls will always be around. Much like jihadists and leftists. Even banned trolls will likely return with new, phony identities and new IP addresses (not everyone has a fixed IP address) in order to get their rocks off by trying to annoy and disrupt the sites of people they don't like. I wish they'd get a freaking life and leave me and my readers alone to enjoy this site.Though I'll continue to have dialogue with commentors, I can be expected to be a bit tougher, more curt, less babbly... and have a much more eager delete-key-finger. That which does not kill one makes one strong.

While most of the reporting and analysis of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's speech at the U.N. focused on what he had to say about the West and specifically the U.S., his chilling closing remarks were lost on most listeners – and apparently all reporters.

The last two paragraphs of his remarks revealed his steadfast and driving conviction, as previously reported in WND ,that a messianic figure, known as the "Mahdi" to uslims, is poised to reveal himself after an apocalyptic holocaust on Earth that leaves most of the world's population dead. "I emphatically declare that today's world, more than ever before, longs for just and righteous people with love for all humanity; and above all longs for the perfect righteous human being and the real savior who has been promised to all peoples and who will establish justice, peace and brotherhood on the planet," Ahmadinejad said. "Oh, Almighty God, all men and women are your creatures and you have ordained their guidance and salvation. Bestow upon humanity that thirsts for justice, the perfect human being promised to all by you, and make us among his followers and among those who strive for his return and his cause."

Read it all.I wonder if leftists, once they read what I just excerpted above, are the least bit alarmed or even mildly concerned with this totalitarian monster's theocratically insane rantings. I doubt it, and that's the ironic thing, for leftists, I find, usually express trepidations, at the very least, about devout Christians and Jews and even sometimes illogically, stupidly, prejuducially declare they're "more afraid of devout Christians than they are of devout Muslims".Do realize that Ahmadinejad was speaking in code. Don't be fooled by the words he speaks, for he necessarily speaks with a forked tongue: what he actually means is what he's said before, in terms of Islam dominating the world, wiping Israel and America off the face of the earth and even wiping out the entire "Anglo-Saxon race". Now, if that doesn't conjure visions of another historically-significant monster, one named Hitler, in the minds of leftists, then I'd consider that further proof that leftism is a form of insanity.Then again, how do we explain why the left isn't afraid of Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? They're one , two or three of the following: ignorant, stupid and insane. Period. And that could've as easily applied to Neville Chamberlain for his not seeing the incipient dangers to the world posed by Adolf Hitler.History should be paid attention and its lessons applied to the present.At this time I will continue to keep comment moderation on. For my saying these things above will no doubt anger the left, as the Pope's speaking the truth has angered Muslims (perhaps with a little push from the MSM- see post below). Therefore I believe it necessary to maintain the current level of security to prevent enraged, malicious leftists from launching another attempt to take over and mess up the comments section with their stupid crap. Again, I thank all good readers and commentors for their patience.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Read this examinationof the timeline involving the events following the Pope's recent speech about Mohammed and Islam. Pay particular attention to what it says about the behavior of the BBC.

The BBC, the New York Times and the Guardian are examined for their behavior, which could be seen as the cause of international Muslim unhingedness and murderous violence.

It begins by describing how quiet it was following the Pope's speech. Seems no one really knew or cared... until the BBC did its thing... and then the whole thing exploded from then onwards.

The way I see it from this examination, everything was fine until the BBC decided to pursue a course of action whose result was to forge an unnecessary problem. The problem may not have happened of its own accord; could it be a case of MSM manipulation of populations? Planting a seed and watering it...?

Draw your own conclusions. Is this the MSM deliberately creating international, interfaith incidents... perhaps to boost its bottom line? Would the MSM want to somehow hurt the Pope?

Maybe accidentally start a jihad? Would the MSM do such a terrible thing?

Was there malicious aforethought, or was it merely pure, unadulterated stupidity?

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - Iran's nuclear activities are "transparent, peaceful and under the watchful eye" of United Nations inspectors, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday.

Oh, really? Yep, sure, and I'm having the wildest sex on a daily basis with all the Playboy Bunnies! *Hey, stop that, Tiffany! I'm blogging here, ok? Just give me a minute and I'll get back to you and Jennie...*Heh... That Mahmoud... did he used to do standup Islamofascist comedy before becoming the figurehead of a big, totalitarian, world-domination-hellbent machine called "Iran"?PLEASE NOTE: COMMENT MODERATION IS NOW ACTIVATED TO MAINTAIN ORDER FOLLOWING PROBLEMS WITH NOW-BANNED, AGGRESSIVE LEFTIST TROLLS WHO PLAN TO RETURN UNDER NEW IP ADDRESSES AND WITH ALTERNATE PHONY IDENTITIES. I THANK MY LOYAL READERS/COMMENTORS FOR THEIR PATIENCE.I'LL BE CHECKING THE COMMENTS AS FREQUENTLY AS POSSIBLE TO RELEASE THEM FROM THE "WAITING ROOM". PLEASE CONTINUE COMMENTING AS BEFORE.THANK YOUCS

Story here. h/t: NationalNewswatch.comCBC chairman Guy Fournier has resigned after controversial comments he made about bestiality and bowel movements.(...)Fournier, 75, became the target of anger and criticism in recent days after falsely claiming in a French-language magazine article that Lebanon permits bestiality, and for granting a lengthy interview on the joys of bowel movements.Oh, man... talk about liberal moonbats! The big guys in the white pajamas are a-comin'... off to the rubber room it is...Well, I really don't know what to say about that. But I'll note that he was appointed to the post by the previous Liberal regimeless than a year ago.Now... I'm sure the Liberal "Minister of Canadian Heritage and Minister for Status of Women" who appointed him scrupulously checked him out beforehand for competence and all that... and didn't appoint him just because he was, say, a Liberal...Yeah, suuuure.Anyway, I still believe the CBC sucks. It should be either privatized or scrapped. Why should we pay for something we hardly ever watch and don't like anyway if and when we do?All in agreement say "aye".

Ok, so the New Brunswick Liberals won yesterday's election. So be it.Four more years of high taxes and economic stagnation. So be it.Just watch them mess up. They have no idea what they're going to do, anyway. Nor did those who voted for them. Oh, well...Well, National Newswatchhas received information from NB Tory insiders about Tory leader Bernard Lord's options for the future (emphasis mine):

Our insider tells us on the condition of anonymity that Mr. Lord will consider three options.Option number one: A run for a seat in the next federal election for the Conservative Party of Canada. Our source indicated that the key to Lord's jump into federal politics will depend on the timing of the next federal election. If the rumours are true and the Tories are planning for a 2007 spring election, the likelihood of Lord sticking around and running federally becomes a greater reality.However, Lord's second option: which our insider says is the preferred option, is a ambassador posting in France.Option number three: Stay on as leader of the opposition. This is one option that our insider insists is not on the table.

Looks like the Lord has better things to do than waste his time yelling across the aisle at rookie premier Shawn Graham, who'll likely just do pretty much as he pleases anyway. Myself, I don't see much coming out of another Liberal regime in NB, but I'd invite Shawn to prove me wrong. Most important of all is to turn the province into a "have" province, no longer requiring "equalization" transfers from Ottawa (Oh, wait... I mean from Alberta, of course! Ottawa is merely the middleman). Failure to take meaningful steps towards this goal (and achieve it, too) will mean failure of the Liberal regime, period, for self-sufficiency for the province is the only real goal now.Of course, I'll have to concede that New Brunswick didn't become a "have" province under Lord's premiership. I'll leave it up to Mr. Lord to deal with the inevitable questions about that for himself.Good work getting the story, National Newswatch!

Monday, September 18, 2006

Story here. h/t: BourqueI'd like to highlight some statements from that article from prominent Muslims, members of the so-called "Religion of Peace"TM. Just the facts, folks, about the unforgiving reaction of the Islamic World to the Pope's speaking of the truth and subsequent apology for any hurt feelings it caused. (Emphasis mine):

"Al-Qaida in Iraq" and its allies issued a statement addressing the Pope as "a cross-worshipper" and warning, "You and the West are doomed, as you can see from the defeat in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya and elsewhere. "You infidels and despots, we will continue our jihad (holy war) and never stop until God avails us to chop your necks and raise the fluttering banner of monotheism, when God's rule is established governing all people and nations," said the statement by the Mujahedeen Shura Council, an umbrella organization of Sunni Arab extremist groups in Iraq.

Ah, there's the imperialism... consistent with the dictates of the Koran. These folks are certainly quite devout, aren't they?

Another Iraqi extremist group, Ansar al-Sunna, challenged "sleeping Muslims" to prove their manhood by doing something other than "issuing statements or holding demonstrations." "If the stupid pig is prancing with his blasphemies in his house," the group said in a web statement, referring to the Pope, "then let him wait for the day coming soon when the armies of the religion of right knock on the walls of Rome."

My, my, my, what a tolerant, respectful thing to say. What a peaceful thing to say. Yep, folks, devout Muslims are definitely peaceful, reasonable folks. Can't handle the truth being spoken. Can't accept an apology and forgive.What are the "good", "moderate", "peaceful" Muslims saying/doing? Let's hear from them. Are they going to speak up? What will they say?Anyone heard from any? If you have links, drop them in the comments, please. I would like to know.In contrast:Sister Leonella, 65, muttered the words'I forgive, I forgive' in Italian after being targeted by gunmen in an apparent execution-style killing, father Maloba Wesonga told The Associated Press at the nun's memorial mass in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, on Monday.