Octave Chanute's Diary of his visits
to the Indiana Dunes in the summer of 1896.

Chanute's notes on the two visits to the Indiana dunes in the summer and fall of
1896 are a chief primary source for his experiments, along with reports of the experiments
that he published the next year in James Means' Aeronautical Annual and in the Journal of the Western Society
of Engineers. On this page is the diary along with the footnotes from
the published version by Marvin McFarland.

The two little drawings inserted into the diary are from the original diary in the
original position as published in the McFarland edition.

The 3 plates mentioned in the footnotes are plates in the McFarland publication.
They are lined up at the beginning of the footnote section. Clicking on the thumbnails
will bring the full picture.

Throughout the diary Chanute mentions taking photographs, as he did on both trips
to the dunes. When possible, an appropriate image will be inserted, but it is not
known for sure if that image is the one taken at that time although an effort has
been made towards proper identification.

In all cases, clicking on a thumbnail will bring a larger image or a new page with
more details on the glider and additional images.

Monday,
June 22, 1896

Reached Miller 8 A.M. Took outfit to sand hills and pitched
the tent. Herring1 erected Lilienthal
machine.2 Took several jumps, the
longest about 70 ft. The apparatus is cranky, and falls about 2 or 3 horizontal
to 1 vertical.
Wind N. and steady. Had a number of visitors, one of whom telegraphed to Chicago
that experiments were being made.

Tuesday,
June 23, 1896

Herring erected 12-winged machine3
The wind was gusty and the machine swerved about so that he could not locate center
of pressure. Laid it aside. Practiced with Lilienthal. Got a number of fair jumps.
It is a gliding but not a soaring mach[in]e and little is to be expected from it.
Wind easterly. Had a reporter from Tribune.

Wednesday,
June 24, 1896

Practiced with Lilienthal. Herring got good jumps 80 to 100 ft. Paul tried and was
upset. Avery did better but made only short jumps. Tried the 12-winged. Found it
steady but lifting too much in front. Tied on 12-lb. bag of sand in front. Got a
short flight but machine blew over after lighting and broke. All are afraid because
of its novelty. Wind S. East. Experimented with both kites. Visit from Maxfield.

Thursday,
June 25

Repaired 12-wing machine and reset it as 8-winged.1A Located c. of pressure just under 1st pair.
It proves more steady than Lilienthals and promises to soar. Took a few short runs
but wind too strong and gusty. Experimented with Herring kite, and produced aspiration.2A Took photos of this. Had a reporter
from the [Chicago] Record (Mr. Manley).

Friday,
June 26, 1896

Tried O.C. apparatus with 8 wings, and found it better balanced and easier to handle
than with 12 wings. C.P. about under the center of front wings. Surface was 118
sq. ft. Were afraid to jump with it as the wings seemed too frail to sustain a man
of, say, 150 lbs. and 25 lbs. of machine. Made tests of wind currents with down
and found it was deflected down ward after leaving wings. As a result began the
construction of a kite with circular frame.

Saturday,
June 27, 1896

Rigged up machine with 4 wings in front & 8 behind, the latter superposed to
0.4 their breadth. Found this much easier to handle than Lilienthal & more stable
than any arrangement yet tried. Jumped 27 ft. in wind of 7 to 10 miles an hour.
Broke projecting stick to which wings were guyed. Repaired in 10 minutes. Wind too
light for a full test, but experiment seems promising.

Sunday,
June 28, 1896

At 1 A.M. a wind gust came up suddenly and blew down
the tent, which fell partly over Lilienthal machine, while the tent pole fell over
the 12-wing machine. Both damaged. Avery put up tent again in the rain, and had
both machines repaired by 9 A.M. Monday morning when O. C. & Herring returned
from Chicago.

Monday,
June 29, 1896

Tested 12-winged machine with 4 wings front and 8 behind. Found it better balanced
when standing still in wind than with any previous arrangement, but found that the
front was insufficiently sustained when in flight (59 sq. ft.). The rear held up
better than with wings as previously staggered. Next tested with 8 wings front (118
sq ft ) and 4 behind. Found machine nearly as easy to control when standing still
and sustaining much better in flight. Both Herring & Avery made glides of 76
ft against a north wind and pronounced the machine more stable in its present shape
than that of Lilienthal. This seems the proper arrangement to adopt, i.e., the supporting
surfaces at the front with the load (operator) directly under the center of those
wings, and about 1/2 or less surface in the rear to steady the flight and act as
a tail. The grouping was as shown below. Got no photograph.
Got several good flights out of the Lilienthal-one of 116 ft. Found it out of balance
and tried to remedy this by cutting away part of one surface. This made it worse.
Had a flight of about 40 ft. at end of which it turned over after alighting and
was broken beyond repair. Glad to be rid of it.

Tuesday,
June 30 1896

Raised top wings in 0.C. to test whether the increased leverage of wind would make
machine more difficult to control, and whether the increased distance between wings
would make the lift greater. Total weight machine 37 lbs., a 5-lb. bag of shot in
front. Got these alterations done by noon, but the wind having fallen off to 7 to
9 miles per hour could not test the arrangement in actual flight.

Wednesday,
July 1, 1896

Got a photograph.3A Wind light all
day, so could not try the machine fully. Got flights of 30 ft. and found it apparently
as easy to handle as with the top wings lower down. Thought it sustained the weight
better, but could not be sure as wind was 5 to 10 miles an hour. After waiting till
5 P.M. for more wind, took off the upper back wing and inserted it in the wide space
under front top surface thus having 5 sets wings in front (148 sq.ft.) and having
1 set at bottom in rear (29 sq.ft.). Called this the "Katydid."

Thursday,
July 2, 1896

Took photo of Katydid, 37 lbs. Found machine quite
as steady and manageable. The lift was greater and the head resistance apparently
less. Took scores of glides. The best by Herring-69 ft. at a descent of 171/2o
or 1 in 3 1/2. Took one photo in flight. Wrapped gunny sacks around the wires crossing
above the shoulders, so as to rest thereon and found this a great improvement. The
rear wings flex up behind in flight and preserve the fore-and-aft balance. They
seem to be in the right place. The machine swings itself into the wind but would
be improved by keels. I am well satisfied that this is the type to adopt for rebuilding.
Machine can be arranged so as to slip in intermediate wings when the wind is light.

Points to observe.

Put man directly under the supporting surfaces.

Make the man comfortable.

Place lower wing 2' 6" above ground.

Provide a running board.

Provide variable extent surfaces.

Set wing 7o above horizon.

Set top wing o " "

Friday,
July 3, 1896

Wind still in N.W. some 8 to 12 miles an hour, or same direction & speed as
day before. Made no trials with machine, as we could have done better than the day
before. A storm slowly gathered all day, and it rained heavily in the evening &
night. Stayed over in hope of a brisk north wind the next day.

Saturday,
July 4, 1896

Northerly wind, 6 to 13 miles an hour. Made a few jumps in forenoon-best one 55
ft. Wind freshened about noon and made a number of excellent jumps. Best one, Avery,
78 ft.; Herring, 82' 6". Quit at 2 P.M.. Packed up and went to Miller. Left
on 6:41 P.M. train, sending tent material home by express. Winged machine is more
compact and handy than Lilienthal's and it promises to be safer & steadier.
Left at Mr. Card's

Thursday,
August 20, 1896

Loaded the two O. C. machines on Scorpion at Peshtigo dock, then went to 71st St.
pier and loaded Paul's machine. The boat laid up at South Chicago that night.

Friday,
August 21, 1896

Scorpion arrived off experiment hill at 12:30 P.M. Card's flatboat at hand. Lightered
and got unloaded al 1:45 P.M. Pitched the tent and got settled. A fearful storm
came up from S.W. at 3 A.M. Blew the tent down and rained very hard. All the party;
got very wet and provisions were damaged. Herring's wings blown away and smashed.
Camp equipage scattered & damaged.

Saturday,
August 22, 1896

Gathered up and dried things. Sent for another tent and got it that night. Another
storm in the evening but cleared up by 9 P.M. O.C went to city.

Sunday,
August 23, 1896

Party slept at fisherman's and did not put up tent till afternoon. This being Sunday,
did no work.

Monday,
August 24, 1896

Began erecting Paul's machine and framing trestle. Herring went to city for new
spars for machine (fixed winged).

Tuesday,
August 25, 1896

Began erecting trestle. Work progressing on Paul machine.
O. C. went to city.

Wednesday,
August 26, 1896

Work progressing on Paul machine and trestle. Herring got back in evening.

Thursday,
August 27, 1896

O. C. returned in morning. Work progressing on Paul machine and on fixed wing machine
as well as on trestle. Got boat to Dune Park, but could not get it hauled.

Friday,
August 28, 1896

Work progressing on Paul & fixed winged and trestle. Still no team to be got.
Carried over step ladder and some provisions.

Saturday,
August 29, 1896

Trestle completed. Also Paul machine, except the last touches. Herring set up 3-winged
machine and tried it, but found it unstable. O.C. went to city with Paul & Jim
and Herring went to Michigan City.

Sunday,
August 30, 1896

No work done.

Monday,
August 31, 1896

All parties returned but Jim. Herring cut down 3-winged
machine to two surfaces-135 sq. ft.5A
Took a number of leaps, the longest 97 ft., and found machine stable and well able
to support weight in a 15-mile northerly wind. O.C. called to city by telegram.

Tuesday,
September 1, 1896

Paul found he had been hurt by a branch in the woods and came to city to get a truss
to support hernia. Practically no work done in camp this day.

Wednesday,
September 2, 1896

Paul & O.C. returned to camp. Wind S.E. and gusty, so that no experiments could
be made. Opened box to begin erecting O. C. machine but delayed proceeding on account
of the threatening weather. Bad blow and rain from the north at night.

Thursday,
September 3, 1896

Gale from north, 60 to 67 miles an hour. Paul called to city by wife's illness.
Wind turned to S.E. in afternoon and began erecting O. C. machine.

Friday,
September 4, 1896

Wind back in north and 15 miles an hour. All conditions favorable.
Paul returned from city. False alarm. C.D.C. and Jo Card came down. Also Mr. Macbeth
of Times Herald from Miller by buggy. Wheeler came from city on his bicycle. Got
out Herring machine in forenoon. Took 10 or 12 beautiful glides.
Best:
Avery 10 1/2o----253 ft.
Herring 11o ----239 "
O.C. machine completed. Took it out for the test but it would not lift; needs balancing
& overhauling. Paul machine virtually completed. Put on cloths and took it to
launching ways to try the fit. Found it bound on edges and shoes did not bear alike.
Made alterations. Tested one of the wings with the new angle for guys. Found it
crippled with 65 lbs. and spilled the wind. Needs an additional strut. A windstorm
coming on; put machine near tent.

Saturday,
September 5, 1896

Wind N.W. Tried O.C. machine but results not satisfactory. Tried Herring machine
3 short glides, but wind veered 90oat noon. In afternoon two storms from
N.W. 60 miles an hour. Had to make all snug. Paul's wing strengthened but could
not be tested on account weather. Ricketts went to city in A.M. & returned in
P.M. O.C., Paul, & Avery went to city, leaving Herring & Ricketts in camp.

Sunday,
September 6, 1896

No work done in camp. Avery came to O. C. house at 10:30 P.M. to say his girl was
sick with typhoid fever and he would be unable to come down next day ($20).

Monday,
September 7, 1896

Paul met O.C. at depot to say his wife had been confined of a boy and was very feeble
so that he would be unable to come down that day. Went on to camp. Wind from south
25 to 40 miles an hour & gusty. No experimenting can be done. Tribune reporter
(Bunting) arrived about 6 P.M. Got account of past experiments & telegraphed
them from Dune Park. Returned to tent at midnight.

Tuesday,
September 8, 1896

Paul arrived in A.M. with Maxbeth, Times Herald reporter, the latter chagrined that
the Tribune had "scooped" him. Wind still south, 20 to 40 miles an hour,
so that no experimenting can be done. Both reporters; left in evening. Avery telegraphed
in P.M.and arrived at 5 P.M.

Wednesday,
September 9, 1896

Wind still in south, 20 to 30 miles per hour, and gusty. Tried to test O.C. machine
for wing movement. Suspended it between two trees. Found that by throwing wings
forward an ascending pressure was obtained. Herring raised by a wind gust, in which
post of rear wings was broken. Chronicle reporter came and went back to Miller.

Thursday,
September 10, 1896

Wind still in south. An absurd article in Chronicle leading to a press report that
party had been tossed up into the air. No testing could be done. Made some changes
in O.C. machine. Paul called to city in P.M. by a telegram about his baby's eyes.

Both machines make steady flights. Herring once raised suddenly & turned out
of course. Laid this to stop cords and cut them. Machine seemed to work better thereafter.
Paul telegraphed that he was coming down but did not arrive.

Saturday,
September 12, 1896

Wind N.E, but veering. Put plane further back on O. C. machine but did not test
it. Worked with Herring machine in A.M. but made no great progress. Wind set to
north about noon. Paul returned 9 A.M., worn out with two sleepless nights. Made
him lie down. When wind turned to north told him he might proceed with erection
of machine. This was completed by 4 P.M. by which time a heavy fog had settled on
lake & land. Wind 25 miles an hour & gusty. Deemed experiment unsafe and
took off sails from machine. Herring went off, instead of helping in preparations
and used his machine. Got a number of very good glides, the longest being 359 ft.
and 10o. O. C., Paul, & Avery went to Chicago. Charles was out and
tried machine.

Sunday,
September 13, 1896

Ricketts & Herring in camp. Mr. Manley of the Record came out to make sketches.
Met at hill by Mr. Herring who told him his story of a disagreement with O.C. for
publication. Took the photo from plate holder and another photo of the ground over
which he had glided and got them developed on a steam launch stranded in the vicinity.
Then he packed in with his effects and took away next morning.

Monday,
September 14, 1896

A very wet stormy day. Paul and Avery went to camp but O. C. stayed in town till
afternoon. Was called on at the house at 1 P.M. by Mr. Herring who said that he
disbelieved Paul's story of having flown with his machine, that he considered it
highly- dangerous, and sooner than be a party to its testing, he preferred to withdraw.
O.C. let him go. Went to camp and took reporter into his confidence, who thought
Mr. Herrings action prompted by egotism and jealousy. O.C. however gave orders for
further tests of Paul machine as a kite and in ballast before permitting its launching
with Paul in it. Paul demurred on the ground that the machine might be broken in
such tests but acquiesced in them in view of the new situation created by Mr. Herring's
action. Avery and Ricketts then gave various incidents and remarks going to show
unfairness on Mr. Herring's part in the tests of all the machines except the one
which he called his own. 7A

Tuesday,
September 15, 1896

Wind east in A.M. changing to northerly (28 miles per hour). Got Paul's machine
up the hill and into the ways. Tested it for fit and tallowed the ways. Took it
out and staked it on plain while at lunch. Put it in the ways again in P.M. Paul
got in it and tested its balancing. Was lifted 2 1/2 ft. above ways and determined
that the machine was under control. Concluded the center of gravity was about where
he wanted it and the lifting power ample. Got main rope and guy lines out to launch
it off in ballast from the ways and test it as a kite about 5:30 P.M. but having
discovered a small rip in one wing and a buckling of a brace thought it more prudent
to take machine from ways & anchor it for night on the plain.

Wednesday,
September 16, 1896

Wind changed in night and blew from S.W. Mended the machine and got it ready to
fly as a kite on the plain when a threatening squall at 2 P.M. determined taking
it down the hill to the tent. In afternoon tried O.C. machine with plane placed
further back of wings; found this an improvement. Then tried plane with the convex
side down and found this diminished the lifting power, but increased the steadiness.
Wings are too much racked, however, to exhibit what the machine will do. It is now
arranged with fixed wings and does not display what can be done by hinging them
on a vertical pivot.

Thursday,
September 17, 1896

Wind from north 17 m. per hour at 8 A.M., decreasing to 12 m. per hour at noon.
Got Paul machine up the hill and into the ways. Tested it for fit and rigged it
as a kite with a bridle lead ing down to a long rope to a post 25 ft. from chute,
thence at right angles through a swivel, to serve as line, with two side guy lines
fastened to the wings, and with loose rope hanging from front and rear machine to
change the angle if required. All being manned, O.C. cut rope at 12:35 P.M. Machine
slid down the ways and took the air fair & level. Went horizontally 15 or 20
ft. and then (being checked by friction of main rope in the sand, which the crew
did not haul in fast enough) it settled down squarely forward and westward to the
ground, landing on its keel about 100 ft. from end of chute. One wing struck the
ground and was not broken. Found 4 broken stanchions (at keel) but so little damage
done that all was repaired in 2 hours, by which time wind had become so light that
machine could not be sent off again. Took it back to tent.
This experiment seems to indicate that the apparatus is stable, and will not come
down so as to endanger the operator. It was loaded with 130 lbs. of sand in bags,
and got into a region of comparative calm as soon as it dropped beyond the brow
of the hill. The experiment should be tried again in a wind of 25 miles per hour.
(O.C. went to city.)

Friday,
September 18, 1896

O. C. returned in A.M. Rainstorm set in and poured all day. No work could be done.
Stayed in tent.

Saturday,
September 19, 1896

Wind rose from N.W. at 2 A.M. This is the equinoctial. Blew 31 to 38 miles an hour
at 8 A.M. and 56 to 61 miles an hour at 11 A.M. Machine stood at back of tent with
all sails spread and was tossed by wind which broke the midrib in left wing (the
one which struck the ground) and broke two sticks in aeroplane. Took off the sails
in order to repair damages.
O.C. & Avery went to Chicago and Paul & Ricketts stayed in camp.

Sunday,
September 20, 1896

Paul repaired his machine.

Monday,
September 21, 1896

No wind, an Indian summer day. Paul finished repairing his machine, which is now
stronger than ever before. O.C. & Avery returned from city in A.M. but no tests
can be made for lack of wind.

Tuesday,
September 22, 1896

A violent gale from the north began in the night and blew all day-60 miles an hour
at 9 A.M. and 45 miles an hour at noon. Nothing can be done. Reporters of Sunday
Times Herald and of Boston Herald with an artist called to get data for articles.

Wednesday,
September 23, 1896

Gale blew itself out in the night, and turned to a south wind by morning, 8 to 17
miles an hour. Got Paul machine up the hill and tried to raise it as a kite, first
from the sand and then from the trestle. Found the wind not strong enough, although
when on the incline the machine raised in front so that only the rear shoes remained
on trestle. Then tested machine the whole length of chute for fit of sliding shoes
which proved all right, and took machine back to camp. In afternoon tested keels
on both 2-winged & 10-winged machine, but the exposure was bad for the south
wind and no good results were obtained.

Thursday,
September 24, 1896

Wind from S.W. a gale. Blew all day and no work could be done.

Friday,
September 25, 1896

Wind from S.W. a gale with rain. No experimenting can be done.

Saturday,
September 26, 1896

S.W. gale ceased in night. Very still in morning, with indications of a north wind.
This set in at 8 A.M. 3 miles per hour, increasing to 10 m. by 10 A.M. Got all ready
to test Paul's machine. Got it up to the slide in the afternoon. By 3 P.M. wind
18 m. an hour. Paul in machine and all ready. Cut the rope at 3 P.M. Wind turned
to N.E. Machine slid down slowly on the chute and stopped on level portion, the
two forward shoes clear of slide. This must be due to friction on slide consequent
on side wind. Fastened a rope at once to back of machine, and hauled it back to
top of slide. Told Paul to get out before hauling back. Substituted 90 lbs. ballast.
Fastened ropes to front and rear of machine & manned them so as to give initial
velocity. Sent machine off again at 3:30 P.M.
As soon as the front of machine had fairly left the chute, the side wind blew the
head around and the apparatus took a descending S.W. course, describing a curved
path. The left wing struck the trees west of chute, the tip struck the sand and
the wing was broken, this being chiefly in the main center arm. The machine fell
to the ground and a number of ribs and stanchions were broken. The rattan did not
break. If the man had been in the machine, he would have not been hurt, but this
trial determines clearly that the machine will not perform soaring flight, that
it will glide downward only, probably at a maximum angle of 1 in 4 as shown by calculation,
and that the head resistance & drift must be reduced so as to give a descent
of 1 in 10 (6o) before it can be hoped to raise on the wind higher than
the starting point. This has not been accomplished with any of the 3 machines.
Determined to break up camp to terminate the experiments for this season. O. C.,
Avery, and Ricketts came into town, leaving Paul.

Plates that appear in the McFarland publication:

Footnotes by Marvin McFarland from the original publishing of this diary:

The persons who figure in this diary as assistants of Chanute's are: Augustus M.
Herring, formerly one of Langley's assistants at the Smithsonian Institution; William
Avery; Paul Butusov, a young Russian aeronautical enthusiast who had built a gliding
machine from which he claimed to have had rather extraordinary results; and James
Ricketts, a young Chicago physician who according to Chanute, "had a slack
practice and a taste for aviation. "

A reproduction, built for Chanute by Herring, of Lilienthal's best-known glider
- a single pair of birdlike wings with an adjustable tail at the rear. Pilcher,
the English experimenter, used the same type.

Usually referred to as the "multiple wing" machine. As will be noted,
the number and arrangement of the surfaces varied. Also called "O. C. apparatus"
to distinguish it from the "three surface" (later "two-surface")
glider built for Chanute by Herring and referred to as the "Herring machine."

See Plate 10.
[ed. note: McFarland's Plate 10 was identified in Chanute's 1897 article as the
'seventh form of the multiple-winged machine". The image located at the second
entry of this diary - June 23 - is the first form of the multiple-winged machine.]

In Progress in Flying Machines, p. 9, Chanute defines aspiration as "a
mysterious action . . . by which a body acted upon by a current may actually draw
forward into that current against its direction of motion." This phenomenon
is illustrated in Plate 23.

In the Chanute Papers in the Library of Congress there is an album containing prints
of all the photographs taken during the experiments of 1896 and 1897. Most of the
better ones were published by Chanute as illustrations to his aeronautical articles.
The view of the two surface glider shown in Plate 11 and the
multiple wing machine shown in Plate 10 are the only examples
of the Chanute photographs of 1896-1897 reproduced in this work.

This marks the emergence of the Chanute two-surface apparatus with the familiar
Pratt-truss construction which the Wrights later adapted for use in their early
gliders. (See Plate 11.) The structure of this machine is
responsible for the widespread impression that Chanute invented the biplane. Actually,
the reduction to two surfaces was hardly more than a momentary expedient, for in
his next machine, the oscillating-wing, Chanute went back to the three-surface design
he preferred. This preference is stated by him in a letter to Samuel Cabot, Sept.
29, 1897: "Mr. Herring says he built a two-decker, instead of a three-plane
machine, for Mr. Arnot because it is cheaper.. . . I would advise a 3-plane machine
rather than a double-decker...."

This glide was made on September 12 (see below) but was added to the list of glides
made on September 11, perhaps at a later date. The data for these glides were included
in Chanute's letter to Wilbur Wright, Aug. 17, 1903.

The quarrel recorded here is important because it marks a definite break in the
Chanute-Herring collaboration and bears on the main subject of this work as background
for the latter controversies in the much-controverted history of the invention of
the aeroplane.However trivial this incident, there was a fundamental issue between
Chanute and Herring. After the three-surface glider had been changed to a two-surface
machine and tried with more or less success using the low-set Penaud-type tail in
combination with Herring's "regulator" (an elastic hinge for attaching
the tail to the main framing and for operating it, by cords, on the universal joint
principle), Herring concluded that the problem of stability was solved and that
the moment had arrived to mount a motor and win the credit for achieving dynamic
flight. Chanute was not thus convinced and wished to experiment by other methods
to achieve "automatic" stability and solve the problem of soaring flight.
As a result, when Chanute the next summer proposed that Herring make some center-of-pressure
experiments for him with bird-wing models, Herring demurred. When Chanute insisted,
Herring quit and went off to experiment on his own. First he thought of an association
with Maxim but before long he had elicited the support of Matthias E. Arnot, of
Elmira, N.Y., and in 1897 built for Arnot a larger version of the two surface glider
which he tested at Dune Park in September of that year. Arnot and, it seems, Chanute
witnessed these tests, and at least Arnot-whom Herring privately did not scruple
to dismiss as an "amateur"-was impressed, for he continued his support.
These tests of the Herring-Arnot machine and an additional week of experimenting
(September 13-17) paid for by Chanute are often erroneously referred to as the "Chanute
glides of 1897." James Means of Boston, was present on September 16 and 17,
and the situation immediately thereafter was well described by Chanute in a letter
to Means, Sept. 29, 1897:
". . . I heartily agree to your proposal [to build a power machine based on
Chanute's two-surface and oscillating-wing glider designs] . . . but you are mistaken
in assuming that I control the whole of the machine which you saw in gliding flight.
I originally made the general design, it is true, but Mr. Herring supplied the automatic
regulator, and I should not feel justified in using it without his consent.... He
is so sensitive, and has so many illusions as to the value of the device, that the
praise which you unduly bestow upon me, and the hint that he might be left out,
might cause him to boil over; more particularly as you propose to use the Langley
engine. He was here this morning; told me that the Patent Office had again rejected
his application and that he thought to withdraw it and trust to secrecy to guard
his interests; that he had proposed to Mr. Arnot to give him a half interest in
the profits from exhibition if he would defray the cost of putting on a compressed-air
motor, and he contemplated making an offer to Mr. Hearst of the N. Y. Journal .to
give him exclusive advance accounts of the experiments if he would defray the expense
in ease Mr. Arnot does not come to terms. He reserves [his] gasoline motor for further
terms...." Arnot apparently came to terms, for by the fall of 1898 the compressed-air
motor and machine were reported to be ready for test. Prof. A. F. Zahm, of Notre
Dame University, saw both during the third week of September, and on October 10
Herring wired Chanute to come and see a trial to be made that day or the next. Chanute
went to St. Joseph on the boat that night. Herring informed him on arrival that
a flight of fifty feet had already been made, but when Herring attempted to get
the machine into the air on October 11 all efforts failed. Chanute returned to Chicago
disillusioned; certainly he was not much disposed to credit Herring's later claim
to have made a longer hop-seventy feet. In the following months, correspondence
between the two men was virtually at a standstill, and Chanute firmly resisted the
various proposals put forward by Herring in the few letters that were written. Then,
on October 31, 1900, at a moment when Herring had convinced himself he was on the
verge of solving the lightweight-engine problem, he visited Chanute and made a proposition
in person. Chanute was not interested (by that time Huflaker and Spratt had become
his proteges), but in conversing he must have mentioned that he had in preparation
an article on "Flying Machines" for the London Times Supplement of the
Encyclopedia Britannica. Herring, judging from the passing mention his work had
received in Chanute's recent McClure's article (June 1900), in which a photograph
of the Herring-Arnot glider was labeled a Chanute machine, and fearing that he might
again be "left out," communicated with his patron, Arnot. Arnot responded
with a high toned letter, dated Venice, November 29, 1900, to the editors of the
Britannica suggesting that they review Chanute's essay and make sure that the labors
of Herring, who "risked his life to attain 'the first flight known in history,'
" had not been slighted. When Chanute learned of Arnot's action, he wrote the
following letter, March 24, 1901, rebuffing Herring's rather overheated explanation:

"I have your letter of 17th, and much regret to find that, upon reflecting
on the subject, you think that I have not done you sufficient justice in my writings.
"It is natural for every man to overvalue his own achievements. I do it myself,
but the following is my own understanding of the facts.

"lst. While we were still in camp I made and gave you, on cross-section paper,
a sketch of the two-surfaced machine with a Penaud tail to serve in building the
1896 machine. This you assigned as a reason why I should join you in applying for
a British patent at the time that I disclaimed any share in the design of the propelling
arrangements.

"2nd. You applied an elastic attachment to the Penaud tail. This at the first
trials proved a failure, whereupon Mr. Avery, as he says, proposed the present arrangement,
which proved a success. You have not given Mr. Avery credit for this; neither have
I.

"3rd. It is my understanding that the 1897 machine was similar to that of 1896,
so that the photographs may be used indiscriminately.

"4th. I do not claim to have made any invention at all, but simply designs
to study automatic stability. This I hold not to be fully secured in the two-surfaced
machine as the operator has to move during the glide.

"5th. Upon partial success you left me three years ago, as I then believed,
to be alone in reaping future rewards, and this scarcely entitles you to having
me blow the trumpet for you.

"6th. Notwithstanding this, I have given you more credit than any other person
ever did. I modified my own article in the Aeronautical Annual of l897, so that
you could tell your own story, and dissuaded you from withdrawing your article when
Mr. Means edited it. I invited you to a joint talk to the Chicago Engineers, and
when I was asked by McClure to write of my own experiments, I mentioned your name.
I did not mention Avery or Butusov.

"7th. You invited me to St. Joseph to see you repeat the flight of 50 ft which
you had previously made, but you were unable to do so. You now say that you have
privately made another of 72 feet, but such performances must be repeated many times
to be convincing. Lilienthal made 2,000 glides, Pilcher and ourselves perhaps half
that number each; Tatin, Hargrave, and Phillips each made many.

"8th. I scarcely think that what you have accomplished during the last three
years would warrant me in setting your work above that of Tatin, Hargrave, Ader,
Langley, and others, as you seem to desire. It is a question of judgment. Go on
and demonstrate some important results and there will be no lack of appreciation
in my writings."

Notes, source and credits

Throughout these web pages, and in Chanute's writings, the location of the second
experiments is called 'Dune Park'. It is difficult to locate the exact location
of these experiments on the lake, but I'm pretty sure that they were on land now
occupied by Midwest Steel just east of Odgen Dunes. The name 'Dune Park' was the
name of a stop on the now extinct Lakeshore and Michigan Southern Railroad. It should
not be confused with the current day Dune Park stop on the South Shore Railroad
that is just east of the Indiana Highway 49.

This diary was originally published in:
The Papers of Wilbur and Orville Wright, Including the Chanute-Wright letters, Edited
by Marvin W. McFarland (New York, c1953, reprinted by Arno Press 1972)

McFarland was the head of the Aeronautics Division of the Library of Congress when
he edited and published the 'Papers' in two volumes, Volume 1 covering 1899-1905
and Volume 2 the years 1906 to 1948. The Chaunte Diary appears in the first volume.

Thanks to Ms. Simine Short for transcribing the diary into a digital file and helping
with the images.