Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Did the trial court err when it determined that the "wishes" of LIK to not have visitation with Gregory was sufficient to deny the Motion To Amend Judgment?
Did the trial court err in its determination of determination of Greg's child support obligation?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I: Was the district court's decision on visitation concerning a 16 « , now 17 year old young man clearly erroneous?
II: Did the Court commit reversible error by modifying Gregory Krueger's child support obligation?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the District Court erred in its determination of Gregory Krueger's child
support obligation?