Danger: When Hydrogen Embrittlement Strikes

On an assembly line, high-strength screws are precisely tightened using DC drivers. Once installed, each screw holds more than 6,000lb of pre-load. After coming off the assembly line, the assembled products are placed in boxes for shipping. Suddenly, inside the shipping boxes, the heads of the screws begin to pop off, one by one. When the boxes are opened, about 10 percent of the screws are found to have failed in this way. The rest of the fasteners are intact. What happened?

The scenario described is most likely an example of hydrogen embrittlement. This failure mode can affect fasteners, as well as other metal components. Usually, but not always, the components involved are plated. While most often associated with high-strength carbon and alloy steels, it can also affect other materials, including stainless steels, aluminum, titanium, and copper alloys. Typically, failure occurs without warning, under stresses well below the yield strength of the material, and within a relatively short period (anywhere from a few hours to a week or more). The risk of hydrogen embrittlement can be mitigated by switching to a lower-hardness material, minimizing exposure to hydrogen, or by heating to a temperature that allows the hydrogen to diffuse out.

Hydrogen embrittlement can occur when a metal absorbs atomic hydrogen. Hydrogen atoms are small enough to squeeze in between the atoms of the metal. The presence of hydrogen reduces the cohesive force between the metal atoms. This allows the metal to fracture under stresses it would normally be able to withstand. (Exactly what happens at an atomic level continues to be a topic of research and a source of debate among metallurgists, but the decohesion theory I have just explained is one of the most widely held views, as well as being the easiest to explain.)

The most common source of hydrogen in metals is electroplating. Acid cleaning processes performed prior to plating, as well as the electroplating process itself, can cause metals to absorb hydrogen. Hydrogen can also be produced during the arc welding process. Galvanic corrosion is another possible source of hydrogen; hydrogen is produced at the cathode (i.e. the more noble of the two metals). Service exposure to strong acids or to hydrogen gas can also introduce hydrogen into the metal.

The materials most commonly affected by hydrogen embrittlement are carbon and alloy steels, with hardness above around 35 Rockwell C. Steels with hardness below this value are rarely affected. One widely repeated myth about hydrogen embrittlement is that stainless steels are immune. Actually, precipitation-hardenable and 400-series stainless steels are very susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement. It's rare, but not impossible, for hydrogen embrittlement to occur in 300-series stainless steels.

The fact that hydrogen embrittlement is not often seen in 300-series stainless steels is partly due to the fact that these steels are seldom plated, and seldom have a hardness above 35 Rockwell C. However, severe cold work (such as cold heading) can produce a hardness this high, which will make the steel subject to embrittlement if exposed to hydrogen. Aluminum alloys, titanium alloys, and copper alloys can also be affected by hydrogen embrittlement. Again, the highest-strength alloys are the most susceptible.

Derating is not a good option for dealing with hydrigen embrittlement due to the unpredictability of potnetial failure. The problem must be controlled/eliminted in process. I know of circumstance in which a critical flight control component fialed due to hydrogen embrittlement under strictly vibratory loading - no compression or tensile load at all. Reuslt was the death of a number of individuals.

Well, hydrogen embrittlement is a long known issue that has played havoc with metals at nuclear power plants and has lead to fuel rod cadding failures along with reduction of the rating of some containment vessels.

@TJ McDermott: I would strongly recommend against derating hydrogen embrittled parts, if by derating you mean using the affected parts in a lower-stress application. The problem is that it's extremely difficult to predict what level of stress a hydrogen-embrittled part will fail at. Even residual stresses from the forming process may be enough to produce microcracks, which may propagate later in fatigue. If I knew that a part was likely to be hydrogen embrittled, I wouldn't recommend using it in any application.

The same line of argument applies to baking parts as a re-work method after a problem has been found. As I mentioned, it's important to bake parts as soon as possible after plating or welding. Some aerospace specifications require that this be done within one hour. The more time passes, the less effective baking will be. This is not so much due to the hydrogen being any more difficult to remove (although you will hear this claim), so much as the fact that microcracks may have already formed as a result of residual stress. Obviously, once cracks have formed, no amount of baking will heal them.

As naperlou pointed out, prevention of process-induced hydrogen embrittlement depends on having a good quality system in place. If you're plating or welding high-strength parts, you need to ensure that they are always baked at the proper temperature within the specified length of time.

This is an interesting example of a failure mode that is not going to be easy to predict. It seems that, short of testing a sample of the parts after each process, one can only track the parts after production and remedy situations as they occur. This requires a detailed tracking of the products after delivery and detailed reports of problems. In general, quality control systems do this. By linking those databases with design data in a PLM system, another big theme of Design News lately, one can avoid the problem in the future.

The standards electrical machines and components are required to meet in the food processing industry are far more stringent than those in traditional plant construction. For specialized production environments such as these, components must not only resist thermal and physical stresses, but they must also be resistant to the chemicals used to sterilize equipment.

The word “smart” is becoming the dumbest word around. It has been applied to almost every device and system in our homes. In addition to smartphones and smart meters, we now hear about smart clothing and smart shoes, smart lights, smart homes, smart buildings, and every trendy city today has its smart city project. Just because it has a computer inside and is connected to the Web, does not mean it is smart.

Was Steve Job’s signature outfit of a black turtleneck, jeans, and sneakers the secret behind his success? Maybe, or maybe not, but it was likely an indication of a decision-making philosophy that enabled him to become one of the most successful innovators of all time.

Focus on Fundamentals consists of 45-minute on-line classes that cover a host of technologies. You learn without leaving the comfort of your desk. All classes are taught by subject-matter experts and all are archived. So if you can't attend live, attend at your convenience.