Consumer TechConsumer technology is going to exist indefinitely, perhaps for as long as the human species exists. At CleanTechnica, we try to feature consumer technologies that help to reduce global warming pollution and other types of pollution. For example: electric cars, solar panels, bikes, energy efficient appliances and electronics, and green smartphone apps. Keep an eye on this category for all sorts of fun and cool, helpful consumer technology.

The World Just Got Back 13 Terawatt Hours of Spam-Wasted Electricity!

Billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates hasn’t done much for the environment, for a billionaire who’s put real money behind other urgent global problems. But that just changed. Microsoft has just essentially given back to the world about 13 terawatt hours (TWh) of electric power that has been wasted every year – on spam!

Switched.com is reporting that Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit, working with federal law enforcement agents, has just brought down the world’s largest spam network, Rustock.

“At its peak, it was a botnet of around 2 million spam-sending zombies capable of sending out 30 billion spam email per day. Microsoft’s wholesale slaughter of Rustock could reduce worldwide spam output by up to 39%.

Rustock was taken down, piece by piece, in a similar way to the Mega-D botnet. First the master controllers, the machines that send out commands to enslaved zombies, were identified. Microsoft quickly seized some of these machines located in the U.S. for further analysis, and worked with police in the Netherlands to disable some of the command structure outside of the U.S”.

Spam is not only a big waste of your time, but it is a much bigger waste of a simply staggering amount of global electricity supplies. Transmitting, processing and filtering spam has been estimated by McAfee at taking an astonishing 33 billion kilowatt hours – that’s 33 terawatt hours (TWh) – of the global energy supply, every year!

Enough power, according to McAfee, in their “The Carbon Footprint of Spam” study, to “power 2.4 million homes” – in the first world.

In the third world – where Bill Gates does humanitarian work – that would go much further, and likely be enough to at least power some lighting for the last 2 billion people in the world that currently do not even have any electricity all.

About the Author

Susan Kraemer writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today, PV-Insider , SmartGridUpdate, and GreenProphet. She has also been published at Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American.
As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.
Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.

Please avoid the use of terms such as “First World” and “Third World” in the future – the nomenclature of their use is inappropriate.

Terms such as “Developing Countries” is far more appropriate.

Thank you
D

http://cleantechnica.com/author/susan Susan Kraemer

OK

http://juliekinnear.com Julie K.

It is good when somebody is just even thinking green (= not wasting energy sources, etc). It is not Gates duty to support any of green projects. He is doing that because he is willing to do that. Let’s just agree with any kind of support for environmental programmes.

Hmmm. It’s certainly good to get this juice ‘back’, but Bill’s ‘generosity’ here is only a by-product of defending M$ interests.

Also, if you look at the Gates’ Foundation investments – which include ExxonMobil, BP, Peabody Energy, Caterpillar, Goldman Sachs, Daimler, McDonalds, Coca Cola, Walmart and Monsanto – he’s about as far away from “climate hero” as anyone… especially when you consider the massive good he could do with all those billions of $$$s he’s sat on.

http://cleantechnica.com/author/susan Susan Kraemer

But what a humongous byproduct! Let’s hope Microsoft (and the Feds, who helped) now take out the other 41% of spam too!

BlueRock

True enough – although I haven’t seen spam in a long time since I started using Gmail.

I should be grateful, but I’m just not a fan of Bill’s – to put it mildly – after suffering the effects of his vicious business practices in years gone past.

> …humongous…

That word just doesn’t get the limelight it deserves!

http://cleantechnica.com/author/susan Susan Kraemer

Yes, me too. I thought spam had been eliminated by now, so these figures were a shock

Adam

Well done Microsoft.

By the way you’re wrong about Gates not giving money towards environmental causes. He is working to find a solution to global warming, he just believes that to actually be accepted by the general public it needs to be a business solution that works economically as well as cutting CO2. He is investing billions in a number of projects that try to produce energy without generating CO2. See his TED talk on the subject.

http://cleantechnica.com/author/susan Susan Kraemer

Well he has certainly done it by taking down Rustock! I’ll have to check your TED talk for evidence of some action – so far I’ve not encountered any evidence of Gates’ investment in any of the many many viable (and worthy of investment) businesses that are reducing CO2 emissions, and saving money too.

Adam

Thanks for the reply and nice article by the way.

If you would like some examples just google Bill Gates green investments or Bill Gates Khosla

http://cleantechnica.com/author/susan Susan Kraemer

After googling through it more – I see that his approach is not very well informed.

I really think if he sticks to what he knows, he can do the most. If he takes out the other 41% of spam, that saves the rest of the 33 TWh that it wastes – absolutely gigantic.

http://cleantechnica.com/author/susan Susan Kraemer

Adam, you are totally right, I see there are announced investments in the last few months in several green investment vehicles, like Vinod Khosla’s greentech fund, and $50 million (gardeners money) in Sapphire (algae). Thanks for the catch.

BlueRock

Susan,

I’d be wary of viewing Gates with anything other than suspicion re. climate change – or many of his humanitarian claims. He invests in some of the most polluting, unethical companies on the planet.

He’s in the Bjorn Lomborg mould for climate change: denial of the severity and fix what problem there is by growing the economy, making more money and finding a magical techno-fix, such as geoengineering. He recommends we need to “research” clean tech instead of urgently deploying what already clearly works now.

I think Gates thinks that all the world’s problems will be solved when everyone is buying stuff from American corporations.

Adam

Completely admitted Bill Gates fan back.

You’ve been receiving misinformation Bill Gates has publically stated geoengineering isn’t a suitable solution. He has also been directly investing billions in companies that combat climate change.

This is all verifiable and easily checkable. I’m not asking you to take my word for it. Unlike the rather dubious conspiracy theories you appear to be indulging in.

He has 30-40 billion dollars invested by professional investors so I’m sure if you really went through it with a fine tooth comb you could find one or two investments you would disagree with, but I bet you can’t find anything significant in terms of the amount he actually has invested when you take into account the size of his portfolio. Unlike the huge amounts he is putting into green investment.

http://cleantechnica.com/author/susan Susan Kraemer

I saw $50 million in Sapphire – yes. What else, that is green?

http://www.cleantechnica.com Zach

Thanks for the info, Adam. From what I have seen of his ideas for addressing global warming, they are pretty nascent and more based in let’s just pump money into R&D continuously than along the lines of what is needed and promoted by those more invested in the matter..

But nearly anything is a plus these days… (though, he could be doing a ton more)

Adam

Maybe. I’ll be brutally honest and admit I don’t know much about the subject either. I stumbled onto this article because I’m a bit of a Gates fan due to his philanthropy work.

I do my bit in my personal life though, recycling and using public transport rather than driving.

This site looks quite interesting I may visit in the future to educate myself a bit.

Wind Energy

Search the IM Network

The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by, and do not necessarily represent the views of Sustainable Enterprises Media, Inc., its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.