The ‘Meat’ Imam and the Qur’an

Once again, the ‘moderate’ Muslims are in the
damage control. They are twisting, falsifying, sweet talking and
using convoluted logic to frame that what the ‘meat’ Imam of Lakemba
mosque in NSW, Australia said regarding the exposed ‘meat’ of
infidel (I mean the white Australian women in particular) was just
the Imam’s personal opinion and has nothing to do with Islam.

To gauge the deception and canard propagated by these ‘moderate’
Muslims let us search the Qur’an.

Let us read verse 33:59 from the Qur'an:

33: 59. O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the
women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their
bodies (i.e.screen themselves completely except the eyes or one eye
to see the way). That will be better, that they should be known (as
free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed. And Allâh is Ever
Oft¬Forgiving, Most Merciful.

The most eminent tafsir writer, ibn Kathir comments on this
verse:

Here Allah tells His Messenger to command the believing women --
especially his wives and daughters, because of their position of
honor -- to draw their Jilbabs over their bodies, so that they will
be distinct in their appearance from the women of the Jahiliyyah and
from slave women. The Jilbab is a Rida', worn over the Khimar. This
was the view of Ibn Mas`ud, `Ubaydah, Qatadah, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
Sa`id bin Jubayr, Ibrahim An-Nakha`i, `Ata' Al-Khurasani and others.
It is like the Izar used today. Al-Jawhari said: "The Jilbab is the
outer wrapper. `Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said
that Allah commanded the believing women, when they went out of
their houses for some need, to cover their faces from above their
heads with the Jilbab, leaving only one eye showing. Muhammad bin
Sirin said, "I asked `Ubaydah As-Salmani about the Ayah: (to draw
their Jalabib over their bodies.) He covered his face and head, with
just his left eye showing.'' (That will be better that they should
be known so as not to be annoyed. ) means, if they do that, it will
be known that they are free, and that they are not servants or
whores.

Please read the last sentence once again. It reads:

[If they do that, it will be known that they are free, and that
they are not servants or whores—ibn Kathir]

Infidel women who do not hide their 'meat' inside Jilbab and
Hijab are either maid servants or whores.

The white Australian women who do not dress Islamically are
maidservants or whores.
In Islam, Muslim men are allowed to have unlimited sexual
intercourse with maid servants and/or sexual slaves. A Muslim man
commits rape if and only if he has sex with a Muslim woman out of
wedlock. Having forced sex with an infidel woman does not at all
constitute rape, Islamically speaking.

The natural conclusion is that Muslim men are completely free to
Islamically rape these infidel women, if these whores fall in Muslim
men's hands.

There is no point in accusing this grand Imam of misrepresenting
Islam. He knows Islam inside out. He is confident what he said is
Islamically correct. The Qur'an backs him up one hundred percent, as
explicated by none other than ibn Kathir. Blame the Qur'an before
you blame this Sheik of Islam.

In fact, this ‘meat’ Imam, candidly explained his speech by
saying that his reference of ‘meat’ was directed towards whores and
prostitutes.

What he meant was very clear: white Australian women who dress
scantily and provocatively (un Islamically) and venture into an
Islamic territory, such as Lakemba, Auburn, Punch bowl, Granville
(the Muslim suburbs of Sydney) are truly sluts and prostitutes and
are perfectly suitable for Islamic rape. The Qur’an allows Muslim
men to sexually molest these women, as they are no better than maid
servants or prostitutes.