Law Firm Cybersecurity: Ethical Issues in Wireless Networks

Thursday, February 7, 2019

When considering technology and its implications, there are a number of ethical issues in wireless networks that arise. Even though some American jurisdictions have made it unlawful to access wifi without permission, there are wide discrepancies between what one can and cannot do.

For a time, people filched cable. A major movie was even produced on this premise. While streaming movies and television shows illegally are rampant, people are now more likely to attempt stealing internet access than cable TV, whether from a neighbor or by physically driving around until an unsecured network is discovered. What individuals do while on these wireless networks varies as widely as the legality of their actions.

The Ethical Issues of Attorneys and Wireless Networks

Attorneys’ relationship with technology in general and wireless networks more specifically is equal to, if not more complicated than, that of the general public. Attorneys are ethically bound to adhere to best practices in their dealings with wireless networks, especially when communicating with clients and protecting their personal information. Attorneys also have to ensure that they accurately represent and/or litigate their clients’ activities vis-a-vis wifi as well. With the constantly changing technological landscape, maintaining standards involving ethical issues in wireless networks is no easy task.

The legal and ethical issues and implications themselves are broad. Whose responsibility is it to establish and maintain the security of wireless networks? Should that rest on the shoulders of the internet service providers, hardware manufacturers, or the private end-users? Is there something that local authorities can do to assist with this as well?

Keep in mind, this little matter of unsanctioned access is only one issue. There are countless others, like net neutrality (a hot button issue in recent months and years), or the near-constant use of mobile devices, which are by and large always connected to a wireless network. In 2011 (nearly a decade ago at this point), Forbes asked these questions: “Why is this worrisome? What is it about mobile devices that trigger myriad ethical duties?” They go on to quote the journal Security Week’s answer to that very inquiry: “Mobile devices in most circumstances are the antithesis of control. And thus the antithesis of security.”

The Control of Security and the Security of Control

It is these two principles on which so many of the ethical issues in wireless networks arise and hinge: security and control. The law should work to provide safeguards for the public as they engage with wireless networks at all times of the day and night, for personal and professional purposes. At the same time, attorneys have the obligation to both understand the legal aspects of control and security and implement them to the best of their ability in their own dealings.

On this, the state of California is ahead of many. At the time of the Forbes article, “The California Formal Opinion forth six factors that attorneys ‘must’ evaluate before ‘using a particular technology in the course of representing a client.’” That is good news indeed because the ethics of wireless networks is also largely speaking a practical matter. California’s committee recognized that functional and sensible efforts like the use of a secure firewall, complex passwords for accounts, and, perhaps above all, the encryption of data, can do much to prevent the unauthorized seizure and transmission of personal and private data.

Attorneys are employing wireless technologies and mobile devices more and more as an integral part of their workflow, connecting with potential and actual clients, other attorneys, members of the court, and others. There is an unfathomable amount of data being produced, generated, collected, or stored on wireless devices and others that are connected to wireless networks. The ethical implications can seem just as endless.

Conclusion

Whether attorneys are dealing with ethical issues in wireless networks on their own behalf or that of their clients, there is much to consider and no one answer to the multitude of questions that this particular area of concern can generate. Given the breadth and depth of the matter in question, it is vital for lawyers to gain a wider understanding of what is at stake and how to act ethically for themselves, their clients, and the integrity of the judicial system more generally.

Jaliz Maldonado is an eight-year Army Veteran and is currently in graduate school at the University of Miami where she is studying for her MBA. When she's not working at PracticePanther as the Operations Manager or studying, she's hanging out with her English Bulldog named Dumbell, painting, or reading. Jaliz is also strong with the force and belongs to House Slytherin. Make sure to connect with her via Linkedin and follow her on twitter @JalizMaldonado.

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558 Telephone (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.