News Precautionary debating

"Can you imagine one thing: Somebody will/or trying to kill your "GOD" who you trust forever, then what you will do then?"

My point exactly! Their religion and God is holy to them, even if it doesn't exist! Many of them are filled with hate, but I doubt they would commit suicide if they weren't also convinced that they'll get paid in Paradice for doing these horrible things.

I cannot see anything here, that would indicate kasse believing the muslims being the only terrorists. Still, the responses to kasse where these:

evo said:

Are you are inferring that only Muslims are terrorists? If so, there is no need to continue this thread.

DaveC426913 said:

Are you suggesting Muslims are the only ones who give their lives for their beliefs?

To me these look quite reasonable opinions, presented appropriately. The response to kasse was this:

DaveC426913 said:

You have so many presuppositions and personal biases that it's difficult to call this a discussion. It's really you asserting your personal (and, arguably, blind) beliefs.

Math Is Hard said:

This thread appears to have been created for targeting a specific religion for criticism rather than discussing the roots of terrorism generally.

And locking.

This looks like some kind of precautionary debating. If you have a reason to assume, that the opponent could try to say something bad, accuse him of it and make him silent, before he actually says it.

Are you guys in United States? I'm not. I have a wild guess for all this. You have probably more experience with propaganda that attempts to make all muslism look dangerous group of people, than I have (I'm in Finland, far away from the war against terror), so could this be the reason why kasse's posts appeared different to you than they appeared to me?