On May 25, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 09:23 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>> 2010/5/25 Guillaume Marceau<gmarceau at gmail.com>:
>>>>>> but since this is on *meta*stackoverflow, perhaps it requires people
>>>> with reputation there instead. (And if this is the case, then it'll
>>>> be hard to get upvoted enough.)
>>>>>>> Yes, it need reputation points on meta.
>>>>>> I wasn't able to vote despite having 71 points on stackoverflow.com
>>>>> I got 100 reputation points just by creating a new account.
>> This was enough to vote on the ad. If I understand the FAQ correctly
>> no more than 15 points is needed. Whether or not it helped that
>> I already had points on stackoverflow, I don't know.
>>>>> I already had an account on stackoverflow with my google openid and I used that same id to create an account on meta stackoverflow, but I only started out with 1 reputation point. They also gave me some made up username of 'user23842' or something.
>> Maybe you were the 1000th user or something?
I also got 100 reputation points. Used the same ID to create the account, saw this banner at the top:
"You've associated your Stack Overflow Meta and Stack Overflow accounts: +100 reputation"
Was it a Google OpenID?
John
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4669 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20100525/b270a2a0/attachment.p7s>