I know it is a coalition but surely Cameron could have compromised with the Lib Dems in other areas of policy before sanctioning this? He could have given the Lib Dems a REAL referendum on electoral reform ie not the contemptible nonsense of AV which avoided the REAL issue ie that our current electoral system is not proportional in return for not having an increase in foreign aid!

Its a coalition cos it was the best way Cameron could spout & work his toff- style socialist views & ideas. He is an Etonic socialist hiding behind moronic LibDem grubs.

In the 'Save the Black Children' ads most, if not all, the children look pretty well fed and clothed to me! In one ad of lies is shown a black kid with a ticket around its neck; that same picture was shown about 30 yrs ago and the 'kid' would now be of Idi Amins proportions! Most of the donations go to well - fed monster Rolls-Royce driving crooks as do the ship loads of malt whisky- all paid for by the Britons who have to scrape a living and are we asked or given a choice?

Yes, I doubt very much whether anything would be different if the Tories HAD won in 2010. Personally, I think he formed the coalition for two political reasons namely the Tories couldn't really govern Scotland when they have only ONE MP there (the joke about there being 'more Pandas in Edinburgh Zoo than Tory Mps in Scotland' is very true) as Alex Salmond and the SNP would have been moaning about the lack of democratic mandate and also because the Lib Dems are convenient fall guys for the austerity agenda. His hope is that they will take all of the blame from the electorate and NOT the Conservative Party.

There is also the fact he went to Eton College. Now, those boys who attend that most famous of all public schools are fiercely ambitions. Its drilled into them to be like that and that is partly what their parents are paying for. He really wasn't going to let little things like his own party or the British electorate get in the way of becoming Britain's PM. If he hadn't had formed the coalition he would have had to have run a minority government and gone to the country a few months later which could have been risky and not ensured that he remained PM. He did say that he wanted to be PM because he thought, "I think I would be pretty good at it".

He is likely a Jew with a name like Bloom however I can appreciate the sentiment, obviously, as the ringfencing of overseas aid is a kick in the nuts to all hard working, indigenous Britons.

Things like this bring white folk who like to call a spade a spade, closer together.

It certainly is. The fact that a supposedly Tory-led government is now spending more on foreign aid than even the entire British police force is an utter disgrace and they should be ashamed of that fact. Also, this ISN'T just something you can blame on the Liberal Democrats being part of the government. Cameron would be doing this anyway even if he had a majority as he is an upper middle-class toff who clearly thinks foreigners have more of a right to British resources than Britons and he deeply believes in this policy. This is designed to sooth his own personal conscience about the fate of people in the Third World and to be 'right-on'. He has more concern about them than he does about poor, native Britons.

Jew , Jew , Jew , on his own the Jew is nothing , it's all the non Jews that sell their souls to them for 30 pieces of silver and do their bidding that are the danger , and there are plenty of them willing to do so and they are amongst us in all walks of life , work it out .

A UK Independence Party politician has issued a public apology after saying Britain should not send foreign aid to "bongo bongo land".

"In a statement, MEP Godfrey Bloom said he regretted any offence or embarrassment caused by the remark.

He said: "At a public speech in the West Midlands in early July I used a term which I subsequently gather under certain circumstances could be interpreted as pejorative to individuals and possibly cause offence.

"Although quite clearly no such personal usage was intended, I understand from UKIP party chairman Steve Crowther and leader Nigel Farage that I must not use the terminology in the future, nor will I and sincerely regret any genuine offence which might have been caused or embarrassment to my colleagues.

"My aim, successful as it appears, was to demonstrate the immorality of sending £1bn per month abroad when we are desperately short of money here.""

Bloom's "apology" doesn't matter - it's like incriminating evidence being read out at a trial and the judge striking it out and telling the jury to disregard - it can't be - it's been heard - which is why the lawyer did it.

Bloom is right to say his utterance is likely to double his vote. Racially-aware or not (in the sense that SF-ers are), I am fairly sure the majority of Uk citizens who are not libtards or of the ultra-rich elite are very pissed off with the party line hat no-one in the West should be concerned about the billions our governments pour into the Third World on the grounds that "we" are all as rich as Croesus compared to the mud-hutters.

Billions going abroad to countries that hate us and/or don't need it while we see our services cut to danger point? Derr.

__________________

That six-letter silencing spell doesn't work any more - the Ju-Ju broke.