Wanggaard will not challenge recall loss

Wisconsin state Sen. Van Wanggaard said Tuesday he will not challenge his loss in last month's recall election, effectively conceding the race to his Democratic rival.

Wanggaard, a Republican, lost to John Lehman by 819 votes, or about 1 percent of the nearly 72,000 ballots cast in the June 5 recall. Wanggaard demanded a recount, which affirmed his loss.

That left Wanggaard with two choices: Concede the race or file a challenge by Tuesday. His campaign chose not to challenge, clearing the way for state election officials to certify the race Wednesday morning and make the outcome official.

“Unfortunately, I only have 5 days from the end of the recount to develop a case tochallenge the count of the election," Wanggaard said in a statement. "A challenge would also be extremely costly to taxpayers, who have already been forced to waste $20 million on the recall election.

"Despite pleas from around the state to challenge the election, it is not in the best interests of Racine, or Wisconsin, at this time," he said. "Now is the time to focus on gaining the state senate back in November, winning Wisconsin's U.S. Senate seat and electing Gov. (Mitt) Romney as president."

Wanggaard said he will challenge Lehman for the seat when the term ends in 2014.

The win hands Democrats their lone victory out of last month's six recall elections, and gives them a 17-16 edge in the state Senate.

However, their majority may be short-lived. Sixteen senators are up for elections in the fall, and those races will determine which party has control over the next two years. Thanks to a Republican-friendly legislative district map passed last year, the GOP have reason to be confident about their prospects for future control.

Democrats organized the recall against Wanggaard, Gov. Scott Walker and four other Republicans as payback for supporting Walker's push to strip most public workers of nearly all their collective bargaining rights.

Hillary Clinton's office said "nothing nefarious was at play" when the former secretary of state used her personal email address, rather than one provided by the State Department, during her four years as America's top diplomat.