Category: Religion

We are reminded of the importance of “Gender Studies” by the rather serious situations that can develop and quickly escalate for having missed as much as a single lesson in this brave new discipline of study.

Some #LIBTWITS on the TWITTER are generously offering friends Gender Studies “education” on what appears to be a pro bono basis!

The last thing you’d want to do is send someone out to the field in modern day America without a thorough exploration of the rather unforgiving new etiquette. The slightest failing in this grace can have rather immediate and explosive results.

Gone are the days when our greatest social error might be in mistaking a wife for a mother, or asking a lady with a bit of bulge in the belly when she’s “due.” Those minor errors are all “small potatoes” compared to making a bad guess about a man or woman’s current state of mind with respect to their chosen gender.

Note that you probably still shouldn’t ask about due dates unless you’ve already confirmed that the round belly is a pregnancy symptom. And, given what we’ve learned in the above lessons, it would be best to not ever ask any follow-up questions like, “is it a boy or a girl!”

You might have noticed you don’t hear “my body my choice” chants by the left in spite of the success of this simple four word slogan in advancing the abortion agenda. One can only wonder if they find that wording inconvenient to the modern priority to force shots on neighbors and their children for a “greater,” (collective) “good.”

Just as a larger public have long been trained to terminate discussion with shouts of “conspiracy theory” when subjects are broached that suggest that not all in power are entirely benevolent, presently any who dare ask questions about the quality, frequency, effectiveness and even medical choice are readily dismissed as “Anti-Vax” and therefore “ignorant, brainwashed,” or even accused of a dubious longing to see a reemergence of Polio and lives destroyed.

The medical discipline of immunology, the practice of inoculation and modern vaccination protocols and programs are complicated subjects. And whereas most parents are simply too exhausted attending to what seem like other, more pressing matters, will often swiftly discard any apprehension knowing that it’s basically what “everyone does” and for some of these, the absence of choice, makes it emotionally easier to just shrug and accept an ever expanding list of shots that ultimately become a new normal.

Rather than attempting to tackle the very big subject of the science, and health aspects of vaccination here, I’ll stick to an equally (if not more) important philosophical and ethical issue of what most of us know simply as “informed consent.”

With the help of Communists like California Senator Richard Pan, “informed consent” is not longer much of “a thing” and many other States have endured the destruction of patient rights and a institutional betrayal of Hippocratic Oath. As most know that’s what all licensed medical practitioners swear before attending to their first patient and it’s a promise to place each individual patients needs and trust above any external pressures or real or perceived collective good.

I’ll assume some might not immediately accept that mandatory shots and “greater good” collectivism in medicine as a betrayal of that Oath, but the nefarious Rahm Emmanuel has an equally nefarious brother. And that Ezekiel Emmanuel has literally been working on a dubious plot to change the Hippocratic Oath to make “greater good” and “collective” health the priority over individual patients.

As much as collectivism is destructive to economic life and the balance of life’s liberties, putting “greater good” ahead of the individual, the patient sitting in front of and seeking treatment from his or her own doctor, amounts to an utter destruction of the trust that was crucial to any patient doctor relationship. And forcing risky shots with a known collateral destruction of health for some with the notion that it benefits others is more than just a “slippery slope.”

What’s more is that the betrayal of the true Hippocratic Oath represented by mandatory shots has expanded with a network of obstacles to work and education. California Schools now offer NO “informed consent” exemptions to current and ever expanding lists of required vaccinations to attend school. Once those requirements are met, new barriers are set at the 7th grade for often dangerous TDAP shots. And now the University of California forces more shots for students that now are required obscure, scarcely available, expensive, and potentially dangerous meningitis shots. But no worry. These are only required if you’re living in the dorms… oh, and by-the-way, all Freshmen (at least at UC Davis where a family member is enrolled) are in turn forced to stay in the dorm to take their first year classes. Bottom line, some tyrannically inclined school administrator gets to play their own game of #SHOTNAZI.

WHY DO THE LEFT BELIEVE SHOTS SHOULD BE MANDATED?

The prevailing argument is that “some people CANNOT tolerate vaccination” because of poor health, and therefore those presumed in “good health” must accept whatever risks of their own loss of health to protect those the shots are guaranteed to harm. And this is purported to provide those sickly subjects protection indirectly via the theory of “herd immunity.”

Not all immunologists nor doctors fully buy into the “herd immunity” theory, but many do. However, nobody that’s not sneaking pills out of the pharmacy after hours could be so inane as to believe “herd immunity” could be expected to work without a periodic closing of the “barn gates.” And when you combine the leftist’s other passion, namely Open Borders with Shot Mandates, you’re simply trading Hippocratic Oath, doctor patient relationship, and the health and even lives of health men, women and children for an imaginary benefit to a neighbor’s sickly children.

On what level does that make any sense? (Not a rhetorical question… please offer whatever you might to the comments below.)

So now the latest of a stream of Whores for Hillary has announced she has “the dirt” on Trump. Whereas she acknowledges that she “technically did not have sex with Trump” she’s prepared to ride a wave of attention by showing she can’t be trusted to do the one thing that whores are really paid to do when it comes to their celebrity involvements, namely keep their mouths shut.Continue reading “Democrats’ Selective Moral Outrage”

An absurd declaration made in support of the left’s favorite “oppressed minority.”

At first glance one might dismiss this as another empty bleat by a practitioner of the Nihilist denomination of that Democrat Religion. But then we realized poor Alvin was serious, and was prepared to deliver the musings of an “Actor. Comedian. Activist.” as “proof!”

See, poor George was so full of his dogma, he felt inclined to write a multi-part serious for the very “serious” Huffington Post to prove “there is no sin!” There’s no point in perusing his long winded musings since they are devoid of logic, discernment, and evidence to support his central claim.

But to best attend to Alvin’s #FREEEDUCATION we’ve made the investment in offering logical refutation to his silly notion that the comedian “proved” his core belief.

We will start with the actual dictionary definition of “sin.”

Now since by one definition “sin” is “a transgression against divine law” or “God,” one might say it could not exist without “divine law” or “God.” So if one were to, in turn, prove “there is no God” we could agree that there is no “divine law” and thus no way to perform “transgression” against it.

There is no way to prove or disprove the existence of God, so it boils down to dogmatic belief and, as such, strong assertions like “there is no sin” cannot be “proven” even if we ignore the more general secular definition of sin as “an act regarded as a serious or regrettable fault, offense, or omission.”

If George and his newest groupie Alvin successfully prove “there is no God” then we can give half credit to the notion that “there is no sin.”

The End.

PS: ODP is a secular brand, and for more on our own thoughts as it pertains to religious dogma you can consult this writing that recounts my own evolution of understanding on such matters: My Early Understandings as a “Realist.”

Ordinarily a Papacy runs like that old fashioned idea about marriage. “Until death do we part!” The last legitimate Pope is, contrary to typical Vatican protocols, very much alive. Pope Benedict is literally the first to resign since Pope Gregory XII in the year 1415.

Due to indirect exposure to a Secular Humanist education delivered by my elder siblings enrolled in government school, seeds of doubt on the existence of “God” were planted rather early in my childhood.

From the 4th grade I clearly remember that I was seriously questioning all those lessons I had learned in Sunday school. Well, not so much the “love thy neighbor” ideals, as much as the whole question of whether God made man or man made “God” as means to answer, or at least as a “place” to neatly store away those that couldn’t be satisfactorily answered.

Posts navigation

Follow ODP via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Find us on Facebook, Mind and Gab

Thanks to your support we maintain 33,000 likes, and our most popular posts have reached 3.4 million.
We have been REMOVED by Twitter and hope you might support us in our efforts to fight the evil empire.
Tweet "Mr. #TWITLER, please #FreeODP" to support us in our battle for FREE SPEECH.
We are now on MIND... a BETTER kind of "Twitter" that supports FREE SPEECH.