tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post1692517426221467804..comments2016-12-09T14:27:37.462-07:00Comments on Genealogy's Star: Even more important developments with FamilySearch Family TreeJames Tannerhttps://plus.google.com/111292106004869462088noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527613590529958801.post-75304587639486755732012-10-04T20:34:08.264-07:002012-10-04T20:34:08.264-07:00James
How big do you need to be considered &quot;...James<br /><br />How big do you need to be considered &quot;unusual&quot;? <br /><br />I was moved by your earlier post to try to merge my most intractable ancestors. <br /><br />7xgreat grandmother was represented (at least) six times. I was able to complete one merge. All others failed. I suspect the issue is that she has five versions of the same spouse. After some hours of frustration, I believe that I cannot merge her until I tidy him and vice versa.<br /><br />Knowing there is a fix but being unable to apply it is worse than the mess we had before.Bob McAllisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14003807527131487216noreply@blogger.com