The Abuse Of The Benevolence Of The Courts In 498A Cases

Why is it that as a nation and a race we are able to find a way to abuse any provision made for the common good?

Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code is a non-compoundable offence. This means that once a case is lodged, a case cannot be withdrawn and must be go on to its logical conclusion. However, the Supreme Court of India, with benevolent intentions (Supreme Court in B.S.Joshi and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Anr., AIR 2003 SC 1386), started allowed the compounding of 498A cases. Here is the sound reasoning behind it:

“if for the purpose of securing the ends of justice, quashing of FIR becomes necessary, Section 320 would not be a bar to the exercise of power of quashing. It was also observed that in case of matrimonial disputes it becomes the duty of the Court to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes”.

Here is the issue. These days, false 498A cases are filed to extort money and once that is done, the HC is approached to quash it. Those who choose to fight back and stand up against the extortion racket face years of litigation and running around the trial courts. Their cases can’t get quashed as the High Courts are reluctant to do so. Their is no penalty imposed for filing a false case and it is known that a 498A case, though non-compoundable, can be withdrawn in the guise of a “compromise” by the complainant.

The compounding of 498A cases is thus allowing the extortion racket to grow.

Here are 4 judgments from the same day from the DelhiHC which were quashed and all of them were done as a compromise was reached.

In no way do I mean any disrespect to the honorable judge nor am I questioning the reasoning behind these judgments.

All I am attempting to do is to ask the Judiciary to scrutinize the terms of these “compromises” to verify that they fulfill the intentions of the honorable Supreme Court. I am saying this, as inadvertently, the benevolence of the courts is being abused and leading to the propagation of this extortion racket. Those of us, who stand up to our principles are spending the most productive years of our lives facing persecution for our beliefs and find ourselves defenseless and stripped of our dignity as we had to see our family in jail due to baseless allegations.

If we had “compromised” by paying up, the cases would have been withdrawn. Since we have chosen to fight, we find ourselves entangled in a criminal case for years to come only to be acquitted eventually.

I pray to the courts to look at the effect your benevolence is having on the likes of us and remedy the situation by ensuring that the law remains a law and not a tool for extortion.

Misc

State Police Websites

Top Rated Posts

Some Interesting Stats On Arrests Of Women

In 1930, the British govt arrested 17,000 women for their involvement in the Dandi Yatra (Salt March).
During 1937 to 1947 (10 Years), they arrested 5,000 women involved in the freedom struggle.
From 2004 to 2006, the govt of India arrested 90,000 women of all ages under 498A. On the average, 27,000 women per year are being arrested under this flawed law. These are stats from the NCRB.

Disclaimer:

The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Police in an attempt to extort over a $100,000 by holding them in custody for over a week. The police, in cahoots with the magistrate and the PP, did this due to the ridiculous allegations made in a 498A case by his embittered ex-wife. She filed the case years after he and his family had last seen her. Thousands of 498A cases are filed each year in India by women seeking to wreak vengeance on their husbands and in-laws. Enormous sums are extorted from intimidated families implicated in these cases by corrupt Indian police officers and elements of the Indian judiciary. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of expression – with all the protections this right guarantees.