Why don't you ever report on the Labor Party's, the dems', or the unions' criminal legacy?

Oh, I forgot again. Propagandists try to twist the truth, mainly by posting alaming images to incite the low-information voters.

He has crossed the foul line, jumped the fence, and is playing in the bleachers. If he were anymore left, he would be right. I am a left leaning republican, but his propaganda has such a slant it de-values the purpose. I don't think he realizes he defeats himself.

People with erroneous preconceived notions frequently descend into ad hominem attacks when they have no logical argument against points made, as you just did.

No doubt you are capable of committing many other logical fallacies while avoiding real debate.

My statement was based on observations over the last year, there was nothing preconceived about it, nor was it an attack. Take it for whats its worth, or not. I am very open to debate, but your radical stance positions you out of the real world of negotiation.

Why don't you ever report on the Labor Party's, the dems', or the unions' criminal legacy?

Oh, I forgot again. Propagandists try to twist the truth, mainly by posting alaming images to incite the low-information voters.

He has crossed the foul line, jumped the fence, and is playing in the bleachers. If he were anymore left, he would be right. I am a left leaning republican, but his propaganda has such a slant it de-values the purpose. I don't think he realizes he defeats himself.

People with erroneous preconceived notions frequently descend into ad hominem attacks when they have no logical argument against points made, as you just did.

No doubt you are capable of committing many other logical fallacies while avoiding real debate.

My statement was based on observations over the last year, there was nothing preconceived about it, nor was it an attack. Take it for whats its worth, or not. I am very open to debate, but your radical stance positions you out of the real world of negotiation.

I present verifiable facts in support of my position. Those can be found in a quote box with the source attribution. How do you "negotiate" with verifiable or historical facts?

A difference of opinion is one thing. That's what makes for a good debate. If you can't handle the truth, that's not my problem. For example, "The South Lost." No getting around that fact.

You can debate opinions; you can negotiate positions; but facts are immune to debate or opinion, and you won't get anywhere by attempting to negotiate either one of them.

“See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda.”― George W. Bush

Bobby Scott wrote:..and to add to that, Gerry Adams of Sinn Fein, had very harsh words for her as well stating "She caused so much suffering and turmoil to the Irish people"

I wonder if Gerry Adams, Sinn Fein, and the IRA caused any suffering and turmoil for the English people?

I stand corrected and misquoted Gerry Adams. Here is a statement from him.

"“Margaret Thatcher did great hurt to the Irish and British people during her time as British Prime Minister.

"Working class communities were devastated in Britain because of her policies.

"Her role in international affairs was equally belligerent whether in support of the Chilean dictator Pinochet, her opposition to sanctions against apartheid South Africa; and her support for the Khmer Rouge.

"Here in Ireland her espousal of old draconian militaristic policies prolonged the war and caused great suffering. She embraced censorship, collusion and the killing of citizens by covert operations, including the targeting of solicitors like Pat Finucane, alongside more open military operations and refused to recognise the rights of citizens to vote for parties of their choice.

"Her failed efforts to criminalise the republican struggle and the political prisoners is part of her legacy.

"It should be noted that in complete contradiction of her public posturing, she authorised a back channel of communications with the Sinn Féin leadership but failed to act on the logic of this.

"Unfortunately she was faced with weak Irish governments who failed to oppose her securocrat agenda or to enlist international support in defence of citizens in the north.

"Margaret Thatcher will be especially remembered for her shameful role during the epic hunger strikes of 1980 and 81.

Bobby Scott wrote:..and to add to that, Gerry Adams of Sinn Fein, had very harsh words for her as well stating "She caused so much suffering and turmoil to the Irish people"

I wonder if Gerry Adams, Sinn Fein, and the IRA caused any suffering and turmoil for the English people?

Gerry Adams, Sinn Fein, and the IRA aren't there for the support of the English people.

They are there for the support of the Irish people.

The Irish who haven't yet broken free see the English as conquerors and oppressors, and that feeling goes back centuries since the English cast their covetous eyes toward the lovely Emerald Isle Eire.

Ask an Irishman. He'll tell you, "Screw the English. It's not like they can't take care of themselves. And now they want to keep us under their heel, too?"

The Potato Famine was so deadly because the English were stripping Ireland of all the foodstuffs and shipping it back to England, like the Romans used to do to conquered territories. Potatoes were the only thing left for the Irish to eat because they could hide those underground.

Remember Scarlett O'Hara in Gone with the Wind eating the last remaining root out of a field and vowing never to be hungry again? O'Hara -- pure Irish spunk.

“See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda.”― George W. Bush