tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post5356273862902818215..comments2015-07-30T13:44:51.403-07:00Comments on Cybermetrics: Are The White Sox Really A Bunch Of Underachievers?Cyril Moronghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07148864847009186694noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-9922116062941675642009-08-18T20:36:41.172-07:002009-08-18T20:36:41.172-07:00The Sox have a .675 OPS in close and late situatio...The Sox have a .675 OPS in close and late situations and their pitchers allow a .696 OPS. For the Tigers those numbers are .782 and .693.Cyril Moronghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07148864847009186694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-54861073707031456002009-08-18T18:15:57.740-07:002009-08-18T18:15:57.740-07:00From regression analysis, an equation for winning ...From regression analysis, an equation for winning pct is<br /><br />Pct = .5 + 1.21*OPSdifferential.<br /><br />The Sox should have .530 and the Tigers should have .490. So the Sox should be 4-5 games ahead of the Tigers based on that.Cyril Moronghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07148864847009186694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-75250268733385905622009-08-18T18:06:54.028-07:002009-08-18T18:06:54.028-07:00Fan graphs has the Sox at -.69 wins in clutch hitt...Fan graphs has the Sox at -.69 wins in clutch hitting and +.06 in pitching (using WPA). For the Tigers, it is 1.45 and 1.73. So the Tigers have been 3.81 wins more clutch. That is, they are more timely in their pitching and hitting.Cyril Moronghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07148864847009186694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-18507702337869841252009-08-18T18:00:59.795-07:002009-08-18T18:00:59.795-07:00Anon
You make some good points. Just to underscor...Anon<br /><br />You make some good points. Just to underscore what you are saying, the Sox have an OPS differential of .025 while it is -.008 for the Tigers. The Sox pitchers are 2nd lowest in OPS allowed but that drops to 4th with runners on and 9th with runners in scoring position. But I think that is just bad luck, not underachieving.<br /><br />CyCyril Moronghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07148864847009186694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-85695029877107248372009-08-18T17:34:39.845-07:002009-08-18T17:34:39.845-07:00Kenny presumably has his own projections, ones tha...Kenny presumably has his own projections, ones that are probably better than anything commonly available. Though really, why take him at his word there?Colinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08174892535497307347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-52049145727183187852009-08-18T17:23:10.455-07:002009-08-18T17:23:10.455-07:00Seriously though, the projections systems hardly e...Seriously though, the projections systems hardly even can figure out the Sox.<br /><br />However, the Sox have a FIP nearly .4 runs better than the Tigers and a wOBA 3 points higher and yet are two behind. By those measures sure, they are underachievingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-58858583274540591272009-08-18T16:11:51.892-07:002009-08-18T16:11:51.892-07:00Yes, I grew up in the Twin Cities, but went away f...Yes, I grew up in the Twin Cities, but went away for college and haven&#39;t quite made it back yet (though I&#39;m inching closer). I&#39;ve been up to Brainerd on little vacations many times. We live on the north side, within (longish) walking distance of Wrigley.Billhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07840958382433052735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-79469772595694059722009-08-18T15:37:01.395-07:002009-08-18T15:37:01.395-07:00Thanks. So you live in Chicago, but you are a Twin...Thanks. So you live in Chicago, but you are a Twins fan? I grew up near Oak Lawn (went to Oak Lawn high school). But I live in San Antonio, TX now. In the 1970&#39;s my family took vactaions near Brainerd.Cyril Moronghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07148864847009186694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-10530373154941140342009-08-18T15:32:24.738-07:002009-08-18T15:32:24.738-07:00Thanks, Cy. I actually found this site through you...Thanks, Cy. I actually found this site through your comment to that effect on wezen-ball. Great work here, and you were obviously way ahead of the curve on Pujols. :)Billhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07840958382433052735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-17704246753905377202009-08-18T15:08:05.769-07:002009-08-18T15:08:05.769-07:00Bill
Thanks for dropping by and making such good ...Bill<br /><br />Thanks for dropping by and making such good points. In case you are interested, I posted something on Pujols winning the triple crown on 7-4. Here is the link<br /><br />http://cybermetric.blogspot.com/2009/07/albert-pujols-has-good-chance-to-win.html<br /><br />CyCyril Moronghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07148864847009186694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-608528753722196209.post-89076393548095582972009-08-18T15:00:07.566-07:002009-08-18T15:00:07.566-07:00Kenny Williams opened his mouth and was wrong? Who...Kenny Williams opened his mouth and was wrong? Who could&#39;ve guessed? ;)<br /><br />The James projections are kind of notoriously optimistic, too (not to say they&#39;re wrong, but they&#39;re generally sunnier than ZiPS, PECOTA, etc.), so I&#39;d say if anything, they&#39;re overachieving...Billhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07840958382433052735noreply@blogger.com