Great Job on the RO releases!
http://www.defendrosie.com/ We could
sure use a 'boycott 'O'Really' sponsors until he is off the
air'.
Outright PC blackmail, real criminal investigations and
charges have
come from his tyrannic criminal incitement of hatred and
reprisals
for Freedom of Speech on questions and facts from a
government that
has done nothing but lie to us for decades. It's a
Constitutional
duty to question government, truth, and information. - IMO.

Dr. Bill Deagle, who I and possibly you based on your
gushing one
page review of his 10 page bio, believe him to be THE
FORMOST EXPERT
for 911 Tactics and Facts ­- Has stated in his radio
interview: 'The
Best 911...', and I can't remember the exact wording after
that, but
it was along the lines of summation of evidence/debris - It
kinda
blew me away, because I, like you, knew of his impressive
inside
knowledge, expertise and credentials. Another follow up
interview is
scheduled for Monday, April 9th.

Physicist Ron Larsen has called the articles "a fresh
perspective"
(6:38), "Dr. Ward thinks like a scientist" (8:28), "can spot
hocum
from yokum", "logical people like yourself" (55:20), "dealt
with
issues that were beyond technical" (in other
articles)(10:26), read
several of my referenced documented facts (over 100 of them
in the
first article) (11:00), read the full quote of his later
partial
quote (12:30), noted the beams thrown upward (1320). "spent
several
hours looking over the research" (16:40), notes the
pyroclastic
flows, their ability to carry fine particles and the
"vaporization of
metals" (25:32), notes the problems with reflectivity of
conventional
heat vs much more powerful neuton (ray) heat (32:17), makes
a
comparison between his, Gspooner and my methods (44:00),
"Dr. Ward is
creating value for me" (45:30), "clearly telling the
truth", "neutrons could do something like this (bend the 8
ton 6 inch
thich beam) (46:08), and notes rare legended LIDAR
documented
evidence of massive craters around WTC 1, 2 and in WTC 6
(46:36).
Although, in what seems to be an interesting reversal, his
more
recent newsletter does not seem to share the same content.

A couple of my Ghost Troop fact finding friends (SiBr)
notified me
that there may have been some theory discussion on the WTC
vehicles
in the vague reference to 2 articles dealing with them.
After
listening to the show with William Rodriguez and his
excellent
information and video,
http://www.infowars.com/listen.html#instructions_ajs and
(video -
help him for his courage by dispersing/buying his
video/information
or making a donation to a True Patriotic American Hero).
http://www.911keymaster.com/store.html and then
listening to the
Steven Jones segment that dealt predominately with 'does not
fit the
evidence of vague specificity space beams' and two unamed
articles -
most likely scenerio - one of which was surely Woods -
dealing with
vehicles at the WTC and up to 7 blocks away. Ted Twietmeyer
has an
excellent - which references my original micro nuke article
- article
that is the best scenerio for all of the distant/close
vehicle
damage - also in talks for an interview on Dr Bill's show
who seemed
very impressed with it when we talked. My article - Update
for micro
nukes - also deals with with discarded government vehicles,
so it is
doubtful either myself or my article was vaguely mentioned
in
either 'two articles about the vehicles', the slur of 'Duffus'
for
not being an 'P' word - Physicist, or the vague inclusion on
micro
nukes. Well if it is going to take alot of complex formulae
to prove
it was an inside job, I want no part of it. There is basic
physical
evidence that is being ignored that must fit within BASIC
physics and
does. I can live with any concept that follows Basic Physics
and
probability. Every step of every formulae calculation must
be 100%
factual, a single supposition anywhere along the process of
every
force required nullifies any final calculation. Again, the
total of
ALL of the evidence of every force must be applied. To do
that in
calculations is nearly impossible or would take forever.
Keep things
basic, fitting Basic Physics and probability to find the
answer.
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop
I try not to 'sweat the little stuff' - "With earnest
prayers to all
my friends to cherish mutual good will, to promote harmony
and
conciliation, and above all things to let the love of our
country
soar above all minor passions , I tender you the assurance
of my
affectionate esteem and respect." Thomas Jefferson - so it
does not
make a difference to me, regarding my perceptions of you,
whether you
ignore, refute, or support the evidence. Naturally, I would
prefer
your support the information... The 'Bottom Line' is you are
extremely active in: 911 was an inside job, exposure of
Dimocrap and
Repugliscam destruction of our Constitutional Rights,
exposure of
quite a few of the physical aspects of this tyrannic,
murderous
government infinite acts and avenues, etc, et al... So, you
can do no
real wrong until you stray from the Consitution (Historical
Background Interpretation) toward the side of Tyranny. Until
then,
you are my CPBAJ.
I do have a few questions for Dr. Jones: I'm sure there is
some exact
position you can place Thermate in order to cause fires or
make doors
fuse and can most assuredly produce calculations to prove
it, since
there are only a few forces involved the calculations would
most
likely be correct too. But, it is more than proving it can
be done
in one setup instance. The method of dispersal/effects must
fit all
and the entire dispersal process/effects consistent with
physics and
in some semi-remote probablility all distances up to 7
blocks. The
entire process must be evaluated, not one aspect of one
instance. It
does not take the derivation of E=MC2 to evaluate evidence
that need
only comply with basic physics, the laws of nature and
probability.
Those are the only 3 credentials required. If you have a
basic
concept of the principles of those 3 areas you are every bit
the
expert of just about anyone, except of course Dr. Bill.
Where did
the 35 to 55 X background Tritium come from? Where did -
after
allowing for dilution of the documented water pumped from
the 'bathtub' (DOE) there appears there could have been as
much as a
Billion Tritium Units in WTC 6 alone, more than 7 Billion
TUs in the
drain water tunnels. There are more, but I believe the
points are
made. The evidence needs to be seen and evaluated, not
ignored, and
passed of falsely as 'safe'. Safe is no where in the realm
of
discussion (which it most certainly is not - no amount of
radiation
is safe - merely within acceptable loss of life statistics).
The
question is "Where did it come from?"

Thank you for all of your efforts, time and consideration.

My Best to You and Yours,

Ed Ward, MD

Rex 84 - USE IT! or LOSE IT! Until the Historical Background
interpretation of the Constitution is restored and
corporations do
not have more rights than any citizen. It's a thing. It's
not a
person.

"Do not separate text from historical background. If you do,
you will
have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can
only end in
a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government."
--- James
Madison.

"On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let
us carry
ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was
adopted,
recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead
of trying
what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended
against it,
conform to the probable one in which it was passed." ---
Thomas
Jefferson