Mayostard:Glad to know that it's perfectly acceptable to maliciously destroy someone's property, then blog about it like you're some hero. biatch might have been annoying, but this guy comes off as a dick.

If the biatch wants to file charges, she knows exactly where to find him. It's not like he's in hiding. He did it, he acknowledged that he did it, and now he's willing to pay the price for doing it.

I get so darn tired of rude folks using cells where they're not supposed to and figuring that it's their right to do so.

My elderly mother used to complain that one 'important' guy in her church used to ignore the preachers request to turn off all cells in the chapel and would get calls during the sermon and answer them.

There are powerful jammers available for commercial use by stores, but few actually use them, apparently afraid they might loose business. Portable jammers are available also, that fit in your pocket, but technically they're illegal. (A real fast and under the table movement apparently by cell companies and congress.) Though, you can still get them from the Internet.

I would think that places like that dinner theater would install the more powerful jammers for the people who are going to inevitably ignore the rules.

Mayostard:Glad to know that it's perfectly acceptable to maliciously destroy someone's property, then blog about it like you're some hero. biatch might have been annoying, but this guy comes off as a dick.

I believe the point the blogger is making can be described, in the modern vernacular, as "come at me, bro".

Mayostard:Glad to know that it's perfectly acceptable to maliciously destroy someone's property, then blog about it like you're some hero. biatch might have been annoying, but this guy comes off as a dick.

No, he doesn't. F*CK YOU, YOU STUPID WHORE AT THE PLAY. Everyone in 21st century America knows you DON'T do that sh*t, and you deserved to be ass-raped by concertina wire for the next 14 years for doing it.

In before some self-important asshole shows up to explain why it's soooooo vitally important for physicians to have cell phones with them all the time in case there's an emergency, because apparently prior to the invention of the cell phone there was no way to get messages to people when they didn't carry their own phones and people were just keeling over dead left and right because of it.

Prank Call of Cthulhu:In before some self-important asshole shows up to explain why it's soooooo vitally important for physicians to have cell phones with them all the time in case there's an emergency, because apparently prior to the invention of the cell phone there was no way to get messages to people when they didn't carry their own phones and people were just keeling over dead left and right because of it.

Check it in the lobby with the house manager and give them your seat number.

Mayostard:Glad to know that it's perfectly acceptable to maliciously destroy someone's property, then blog about it like you're some hero. biatch might have been annoying, but this guy comes off as a dick.

Prank Call of Cthulhu:In before some self-important asshole shows up to explain why it's soooooo vitally important for physicians to have cell phones with them all the time in case there's an emergency, because apparently prior to the invention of the cell phone there was no way to get messages to people when they didn't carry their own phones and people were just keeling over dead left and right because of it.

I never understood that argument. I work with doctos and every single on of them use pagers for emergencies. So assuming a doctor was at a theater and was inconsiderate enough to not have vibrate on, it would be a quick beep and they would get up and leave.

If a doctor is on their cell phone (especially in public) it is almost certainly not an emergency.

Mayostard:Glad to know that it's perfectly acceptable to maliciously destroy someone's property, then blog about it like you're some hero. biatch might have been annoying, but this guy comes off as a dick.

You sound like you want to defend the biatch or something...you two related, ya know, like married siblings?

coeyagi:Was at Star Trek last night. So many god damn cell phones going on right before the movie started, but then everyone actually acted like a decent f*cking meat popsicle for once and turned them off.

**SPOILER**

Because Tyler Perry wasn't in the sequel.

//see, it's funny because people who go to Tyler Perry movies are usually loud and on their cell phones

I was at a movie where a girl a couple of rows ahead of me kept her phone on her lap. It would ring about 3x every 20 minutes. She'd pick it up, see who was calling, and hit end. Normally I'd say something in that situation, but this was when I was in college and my school was right next to a really sketchy neighborhood. The theater had a lot of missing seats that had been ripped up and there were 2 fights before the movie started. I was so relieved when a new, nicer theater opened up across the street later that year.

Mayostard:Glad to know that it's perfectly acceptable to maliciously destroy someone's property, then blog about it like you're some hero. biatch might have been annoying, but this guy comes off as a dick.

Mayostard:Glad to know that it's perfectly acceptable to maliciously destroy someone's property, then blog about it like you're some hero. biatch might have been annoying, but this guy comes off as a dick.

Endorsed vigilantism would lead to a breakdown of the fabric of society.But a few incidents like this where the "hero" gets a pat on the back and all attempts at recourse by the "victim" are twarted would strengthen the fabric.

Mayostard:Glad to know that it's perfectly acceptable to maliciously destroy someone's property, then blog about it like you're some hero. biatch might have been annoying, but this guy comes off as a dick.

If you want to get technical, the performance was the property of those who paid for it, and the woman and her group were maliciously destroying it for the other attendees. Theft of services might be a good countersuit, in addition to the assault charge.

Not assault under New York law, its just Harassment. To be assault you need to cause physical injury or intense pain. A stinging cheek does not qualify as injury or intense pain (a nutshot would, not a slap), so he couldn't charge assault if he tried.