Inflation: When You’re In the Government’s Sights

What stopped the global financial crisis of 2008 from getting completely out of hand? Governments did. They bailed out, merged, financed, guaranteed, and handed out ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ cards for anyone who found themselves in trouble. Without government intervention, the financial system would’ve failed.

But what if the financial system failed because of the government’s own dodgy finances? Who would do the bailing out then? Who would save us? The answer is nobody.

The scary part is the world is nearing that point. Governments around the world are in dire financial straits. We’re going to find out the hard way what the world looks like when governments struggle to make ends meet. There are already some interesting signs of what’s to come.

But we’re in Australia. And our government doesn’t have much debt. In fact, we are going to run a billion dollar surplus, aren’t we? Was that a pig flying past your window? Australians need to keep a few things in mind when it comes to our government debt-to-GDP.

Cyprus got into trouble because its financial sector is enormous relative to its economy. The same thing happened in Iceland and Ireland. In each case, debt to GDP before the government bailout of the financial system wasn’t a major problem. But now that the governments are liable to bail out the banks, debt to GDP is really much higher.

The thing is, Australia’s financial sector is way too big as well. Bank assets are around 340% of GDP. That’s more than Spain or Italy, although estimates vary wildly. If the Australian government had to bail out the banks like in America and Europe, our debt-to-GDP would be through the roof.

For now it’s at the same level as Ireland’s was before the crisis. But our banks lend out one and a half times our GDP, about the same as Greece. In other words, we’re by no means outside the firing line.

Correction: You are by no means outside the firing line.

Governments that are cash strapped turn to anyone with wealth to finance themselves. Typically, they go straight to where you keep your money – the bank. Banks hold vast amounts of sovereign bonds.

One big reason for this is the rules and regulations you have to follow when running a bank. You have to set aside capital (like reserves) when you make loans. But when you make a loan to the government by buying its bond, you don’t have to set aside that capital, because loans to government are considered ‘risk free’. We’re not making this up, it’s in any finance textbook.

One reason governments covet high ratings on their debt is that their debt is no longer considered ‘risk free’ if it receives a low rating. Banks can no longer hold their debt without setting aside precious capital.

Of course, when the first country fails, a domino effect starts. One of the main reasons Cypriot banks failed is because they held so many Greek government bonds. The three largest banks in Cyprus lost about €4 billion on the Greek defaults, about six and a half thousand Australian dollars per person in Cyprus.

Now that the governments in Europe have run the banks dry, causing them to fail in the process, where will the politicians turn to next to get their cash fix? They’ll turn to people with savings, like you.

The French tried their millionaires tax. In Cyprus, things took a surprisingly direct route. They’re just confiscating deposits. This method of wealth confiscation has a very bad history, but that’s another story.

So what might Australian politicians come up with to raid your wealth in the name of preserving the government’s accounts?

Believe it or not, much of this is already taking place in Australia. For example, it’s difficult to run your own retirement savings. The government has made it difficult for you to take responsibility over the money you put away during your working life.

The aim here is for you to keep your finances ‘in the system’…to use the default option like everyone else. That way, when the government wants to access an enormous pool of funds to sell its government bonds to, the pool is sitting there waiting.

But the most likely source of theft, not just here in Australia, but everywhere, is going to be the government’s old favourite – inflation. Inflation is a form of wealth theft because of the effects it has.

When the government prints up money and buys things, prices rise. But the government gets to purchase at the price before it goes up. As the new money ripples through the economy raising prices, those who receive it last are left paying the higher prices. Wealth is transferred from those who get the cash last (you) to people who get the cash first (the government).

There’s something important to understand about inflation. Let’s say the price of everything would’ve fallen 20% during the financial crisis if the government didn’t rescue everyone and everything.

You would’ve become 20% wealthier because your cash would buy 20% more. Your assets would still be exactly the same assets, even if their price falls. A house is still a house, whether it’s valued at $500,000 or $400,000. The people who would’ve suffered are borrowers. Their debts wouldn’t have shrunk 20% along with everything else.

Now, most economists would say that there was no inflation as a result of the government interventions during the financial crisis. But what if they engineered 20% inflation, bringing the overall change in prices to 0, because the deflation and inflation offset each other? In that case, you would’ve missed out on a 20% gain in your wealth.

Now it’s impossible to know how much deflation there would’ve been if the government hadn’t intervened. Economists call this kind of hypothetical scenario the ‘counterfactual’. But the point is that inflation can steal wealth in unnoticeable ways. You’ll never know how much wealthier deflation would’ve made you.

The easiest way to opt out of all this is to think and deal in real values. Never mind prices, cash and interest rates. These are now tools of the government to make their finances appear reasonable. Instead, think in terms of something you know the real value of because you use it.

Petrol might be a good example. How has your family’s financial status performed adjusted for the rise in petrol prices? How are your retirement investments performing in terms of how many litres of petrol you could buy? Are you wealthier or poorer?

For this month’s issue of the Money for Life Letter we’ve investigated a rather odd way of investing in tangible assets you can instantly know the value of, regardless of their price. Ironically, the asset has outperformed the stock market many times over these last few years.

But, best of all, it’s difficult for the government to get their hands on this way of investing your wealth. The issue is due out tomorrow. In the meantime, you could find out about another way you might end up hundreds of thousands of dollars better off here.

Nick Hubble is a feature editor of The Daily Reckoning and editor of The Money for Life Letter. Having gained degrees in Finance, Economics and Law from the prestigious Bond University, Nick completed an internship at probably the most famous investment bank in the world, where he discovered what the financial world was really like. He then brought his youthful enthusiasm and energy to Port Phillip Publishing, where, instead of telling everyone about The Daily Reckoning, he started writing for it.
To follow Nick's financial world view more closely you can you can subscribe to The Daily Reckoning for free here. If you’re already a Daily Reckoning subscriber, then we recommend you also join him on Google+. It's where he shares investment research, commentary and ideas that he can't always fit into his regular Daily Reckoning emails.

Comments

Re your question – How are your retirement investments performing in terms of how many litres of petrol you could buy?

This question could be worded a more meaningful way in terms of the cost of travel in a private car. Mine has gone down considerably in the last three years. My latest car consumes half the fuel per kilometer of the one it replaced. About 50% of my own purchases are made from home over the internet so I do not need to travel to make purchases. I refuel my car about 6 times per year.

I use solar energy to produce electricity for household use. My exported electricity also pays for my gas. Solar panels are now 30% of what they cost 5 years ago. My solar panels are helping all electricity users because it contributes to the current glut in power generating capacity in Australia thereby lowering prices for all. I use predominantly LED lights that use 10% of the electricity for the same illumination of incandescent lights.

My last TV cost 10% of the same size unit it replaced that was purchased 6 years ago. The new set uses half the power.

My telephone and internet costs have halved in the last year while service has improved. I still do not take advantage of VOIP opportunity though.

You could do better with this daily letter by providing useful investment advice on investments that reduce individual consumption rather than just going on about the inevitability of inflation due to government debt. There are many opportunities to do more with less. This is a mindset that needs to be encouraged.

Leave a Reply

Testimonial

Just thought I would let you know that whilst I receive countless financial emails daily I view yours as something special. I am not looking for the same old humdrum I am looking for news that is out of left field. Now you guys would be off the planet if you went any further left but it is refreshingly different. I get through the humdrum first and get my mind sorted and save you for last as a check. It is certainly an insane moment in time but I am still finding investment opportunities. Thanks for your comments