What is the point in being a member of a conspiracy site while having contempt for conspiracies.

While I wouldn't say you should be contemptuous, I do think its necessary to have a healthy dose of skeptictism when dealing in conspiracies. You
almost need to debunk yourself, debunk what you believe until you're left with only the most objective and quantitative evidence. Without doing so
you end up believing in everything and looking foolish. You have to be your own skeptic.

Originally posted by ipsedixit
It is interesting that the 2007 inquest was into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayad only.

Just why do you think the UK would hold a inquest for someone who was a Frenchman, working in France

There were two British inquests into a traffic related incident in France. Britain doesn't hold inquests into every traffic fatality of a British
citizen overseas. Clearly these British inquests were related to the uproar over Princess Diana's death and its causes. But the inquest was an
obvious cover-up for a number of reasons, one being that it neglected to look into the cause of death of driver Henri Paul.

Surely the death of the driver of the vehicle in which others died would be considered related to the deaths of passengers in the car
and could conceivably have been the actual cause of the other deaths.

The fact that Paul was French is all the more reason to hold an inquest in and of itself. He was French for God's sake! A Frenchman with a driver's
license!!!!

Originally posted by SecretFace
MI6 operate world wide, its not unusual for them to be distributed throughout Europe. I think the pressence of MI6 proves nothing. The style in which
the accident occured is not something I would link to a secret service hit, as there is no 100% gurantee of success, they operate in the realms of
total success not "yeah that should be enough to do it". Besides, if you knew how many foreign agencies operate in this country, you would be
shocked, as well as just how many murders take place on British soil by foreign agents, again they're easy to spot but the government don't want you
to know that what they action abroad actually happens just as much here on our own soil so the general public never get to know the true reality of
"spy world hits". Not saying Princess Di was not a hit of sorts, but the reports of MI6 agents in Paris at the time, in my mind and experience,
proves nothing.

I'm not sure if you have seen Unlawful Killing. From the sound of your post, I would guess that you haven't.

There is testimony in the film from a former SIS operative that the exact scenario alleged to have been involved in Princess Diana's death, the
speeding car in the tunnel, the bright flash of light, the crash, was featured in an MI6 document related to a plan to assassinate an official of
Slobodan Milosovic's government.

The plan is in the books, so to speak, as MI6 approved tactics.

Everything related to the car is an area of interest to people trying to solve the problem. According to the video, Henri Paul's blood may have been
switched out of the loop when tests were conducted. It is possible that Paul was not inebriated and that the car was not in Paul's control when it
sped into the tunnel.

The speed and direction of the car could be controlled from outside the vehicle. It has been done before to commit well financed murders and not just
in recent computerized times. An SAS veteran was knocked off in the 70s by such a tactic paid for by a Yemeni political leader and carried out by
contract killers. The book, The Feather Men mentions the incident.

To really understand the conspiracy point of view one has to see the video. The simple fact that the medical people who performed the autopsy and that
did the blood tests were not permitted by the French government to go to London to testify at the inquest, where their findings were criticized by
experts, is suspicious in the extreme.

Originally posted by ipsedixit
Surely the death of the driver of the vehicle in which others died would be considered related to the deaths of passengers in the car
and could conceivably have been the actual cause of the other deaths.

Well, he was the main cause of the deaths of the others, but again the UK would not hold a inquest into the death of a frenchman in France.

Royals always look to the past and they didn’t want a repeat of what happened when Catherine of Valois, Princess of France and wife of English King
Henry V was widowed. Look it up. Rumors were the Diana was pregnant by Dodi Fayed, a muslem billionaires son. This was directly tied to the Catherine
of Valois situation historically and Diana was killed for it.

Completely agree - there was a lot of speculation that Di was indeed pregnant, and if i remember correctly, there were even eyewitness accounts of her
being very much alive at the scene, but Im not sure about the credibiity of either claim.

Excited to make my first post on a thread!

( newbie here)

What is strange is the removal of her uterus after she was embalmed in France.

Here is a better theory...she went for a meal with her boyfriend and on the way home a drunk driver tried to speed away from the press and hit a
concrete pillar and they all died.
Just because she is famous etc it doesn't mean she can not die in an accident.

Seeing the documentary is helpful in discussing the subject. Henri Paul's blood tests were completely inconsistent with his behavior on surveillance
tape just prior to leaving the hotel. He appeared alert and steady on the tape and yet a few minutes later he died, completely inebriated and with a
more than lethal concentration of carbon monoxide in his blood. According to the blood tests.

The results of these tests were incomprehensible to medical experts at the inquest with a suggestion that the tests had been botched or that the blood
of Paul was not tested. When Fayad's legal representatives asked for more tests, they were told the blood samples had been destroyed.

The inquest was not permitted to question the French doctors who did the autopsy or the tests under a French law which protects state secrets. It is
believed that the doctors in question must have known "state secrets".

The only "state secret" that the doctor who did the blood tests could possibly have known is that the blood was not Henri Paul's. It's a small state
secret but it would lead to other bigger ones.

Yes, and isn't it funny how the Queen's secretary testified and was later promoted to the House of Lords as well as others who participated in the
inquest? People becoming Lords is a concrete example of how these psychopaths view themselves and end up believing they have reached god status. What
do gods do? They give and take life.

That's exactly correct. I did watch the documentary last night after Christian Jihad posted it. I thought it was very well made and I'm happy that
the producer/director discussed how the royals are psychopathic murderers.

I liked how it also stated that Diana had always been fearful of dying in a car accident and would always wear her seatbelt. It's certainly possible
that her seatbelt had been tampered with as the car was being worked on right before she and Dodi were picked up. If I had been Dodi, I think I
would've switched seats with her, so she could use the working seatbelt if indeed his was working. The documentary only stated that hers was found to
be faulty.
I also liked how they focused on the ambulance involved. It sure did take it's time getting to the wreck and the hospital when the streets were
clear. It's also shocking how long it took to get Diana out of the car when the car's damage was not that bad on her side. Why did it take so long
to get her from the car into the ambulance? From what the film states, her injuries weren't so bad that she couldn't have been saved if they'd
gotten her to the hospital in a timely manner.

Originally posted by JasmineG
I read a book awhile back that made the assertion that the car she was driving in had the seatbelt clasp pins filed down so that when pressure was
applied the seatbelts would fail and spring open.

Apart from the fact that the only person to survive was the only one actually wearing a seatbelt.... Just goes to show being driven at speed by a
drunk driver whilst not wearing a seatbelt is not safe.

About 1 million people die on the roads every year, and some people think that as Diana was a "princess" she could not be one of them!

I think you`re being very naive.
She told people she had been threatened that she`d die in a car crash and it happened.
That`s no coincidense.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.