December 21, 2006

I think that Bush's "new" plan has been laid out in various media sources. Whether it comes to fruition remains to be seen. Before trying to piece a somewhat coherent picture together its important to consider some context. First and most importantly, this war was never about the Iraqi people, WMDs, or even bringing Democracy to Iraq. I’m sure Bush and his murderous group of neocons would have been happy if Democracy somehow sprung up in the Middle East as long as it was our kind of Democracy. But it’s not a central point. This is a geopolitical and resource war. Energy supplies are not only important in themselves but also as a means to exerting power throughout Eurasia countering, at least in part, Russia’s use of energy as a political tool and the rise of China as a economic force. Do not underestimate the importance of these points.

Secondly, all the weeping and gnashing of teeth over the violence in Iraq is completely out of touch with the Bush reality. Iraqi deaths mean nothing and never had. Just look at the way the war has been run. Look at Fallujah, the use of cluster weapons etc etc etc. And don’t give me any crap about this is not what America is about. It is exactly what America is and has been about. Americans had no difficulty slaughtering Indians to open up the lands of the West for economic expansion. So killing a few hundred thousand dark skinned Muslims so we can be the great empire and preserve our economic way of life is just a natural manifestation of American superiority and morality.

The big target is Iran. As Alissa Rubin pointed out in the LA Times , so far, Iran has been the big winner in the Iraq war. This is clearly important on many levels. Iran has large energy reserves and has been signing energy contracts with many countries including China and Pakistan. They also pose a threat to Sunni dominated governments in the ME such as Saudi Arabia. Not only have we been fed a constant, daily diet of attack Iran now gruel from the Israelis and their right wing supporters such as Michael Leeden, but it has been reported by Steve Clemmons that the Saudis many not interfere with an attack on Iran. There has also been a rising fear of an Iran-Saudi proxy war in Iraq, with the Saudis backing their Sunni kin. link. And as we have seen, the Iraqi government has been reaching out to the Sunnis. So the trial balloon recently floated about the US taking the side of the Shias against the Sunnis is just not realistic. The other issue that has received media attention recently is the problem posed by al Sadr. There was a report of a coalition that may be willing to bloc Sadr and do so with Sistani’s approval. But as Swopa reminds us this is likely Hakim of the SCIRI pitching the same screw Sadr deal that he put forth in the spring and Sistani vetoed. Let’s not forget that Malki owes his job to Sadr so his willingness to clamp down on Sadr’s activities is pretty thin. So there’s really no evidence that a coalition can be put together that will some how turn things around in Iraq.

A coalition may be formed by those who want to stay out of the impending shit-storm that’s on its way. My guess based on my eternal pessimism concerning our government, its media enablers, and what they feel is at stake is the following. Malki will be out, to be replaced by a Sunni maybe Allwai. All decisions will be based on who is willing to stand with the US (and out of the way of the cruise missiles and/or F18s) and not what makes sense for the people of Iraq. They will go after Sadr or wait for him to come after them, depending on whether they feel they need the added justification to reduce Sadr city to rubble. The surge of US troops is meaningless in terms of fighting Sadr who supposedly has 60,000 militiamen. The extra US troops will be used to protect the Green Zone and other areas deemed important. The heavy lifting for getting rid of Sadr will be left to the Air Force. Iran will be attacked probably with tactical nukes. Whether the US or the Israelis do it makes little difference.

I firmly believe that the US will not get out of Iraq unless literally forced. This administration and their Democratic enablers believe that there is too much at stake for us to leave. The administrartion has outright rejected every common sense idea such as opening a dialogue with Syria and Iran. Its not just stupidity but it also interferes with their plan.

[snip]

There is little doubt in my mind which choice will be made. Further deaths of Iraqis are of little consequence to our leaders and their cheerleaders. Further deaths of Americans will be used to justify the atrocities to be unleashed.

I’ve been trying to see the world through their eyes
Where day is night and black is white
Left is Right
Left is Right
Left is Right for me

Put your head in the sand and you'll never know
What's waiting for you in the depths below (below)
Don't believe everything that you read
Take what you want and keep what you need

I’ve been trying to see the world through their eyes
Where day is night and black is white
Left is Right
Left is Right
Left is Right for me
I said Left is Right
Left is Right
Left is Right for me
For me, For me, For Me!

TWISTED NIXON

Written in 1998 after Johnny Punish who was sitting
at the Las Vegas Hilton Sports Book and was hit by
the absurdity of the place. It absorbed him and he
wrote the phrase "LEFT is RIGHT for me" on a drink
napkin. That night in a studio in the seedy back
alleys of Las Vegas, LEFT IS RIGHT was born when
then lead guitarist, Brian Jay Cline, wrote the
clever verses while Twisted Nixon added the melodies.
Sung by Brian Jay Cline, Left is Right is clearly
Twisted Nixon's best ever in terms of a pop anthem.
This song is the most requested song by fans.
Produced by Paul Hampton of The Skeletones