In a tweet storm, Benjamin Wittes made several points rebuffing the president’s suggestion that Comey acted inappropriately with respect to the Hillary Clinton email investigation. But one of Ben’s tweets stands out.

The people who think Comey was out to save Hillary really should have a cage match with those who think he was out to defeat her. /2/

In October, after Comey announced in a letter to Congress that the FBI was reviewing additional emails, Trump affirmed that he thought Clinton should be investigated and praised the director for standing up to the system at a rally. He said: “It took guts for Director Comey to make the move that he made in light of the kind of opposition he had where they’re trying to protect her from criminal prosecution.”

Then, in his letter dismissing Comey on May 9, the president “accepted [the] recommendation” of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s memo and suddenly joined the ranks of those who believed that Comey had mistreated Hillary Clinton in his handling of her investigation.

But if his comments to Lester Holt and Russian diplomats that the Russia investigation played a role in his decision didn’t manage to cast doubt on the sincerity of that rationale, today’s tweet certainly should: The President is now once again–as before he discovered Comey’s unfairness to Clinton–arguing that he treated her too leniently.

Matthew Kahn is an associate editor at Lawfare and a research assistant at the Brookings Institution. Previously, he was a research assistant at the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law and a research intern at the Network Science Initiative at the National Journal. He holds a bachelor's degree in government from Georgetown University.