LACK CONFIDENCE IN BALFOUR; MANY BRITISH UNIONISTS BELIEVE THAT JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN WOULD HAVE MADE A STRONGER PREMIER -- PROBABLE CABINET APPOINTMENTS.

LONDON, July 19 -- Cabinet making is the absorbing subject of discussion here. During the week the public was regaled with more or less shrewd prophecies, but no intimations were given out by the inner circle of the intentions of the Premier. A. J. Balfour, regarding the successors of the Ministers who have already resigned, or as to how far the changes in the Ministry may be expected to extend. View Full Article in Timesmachine »

We are continually improving the quality of our text archives. Please send feedback, error reports,
and suggestions to archive_feedback@nytimes.com.

A version of this archives appears in print on July 20, 1902, on Page 4 of the New York edition with the headline: LACK CONFIDENCE IN BALFOUR; MANY BRITISH UNIONISTS BELIEVE THAT JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN WOULD HAVE MADE A STRONGER PREMIER -- PROBABLE CABINET APPOINTMENTS. Order Reprints|Today's Paper|Subscribe