Defending the Christian faith and promoting its wisdom against the secular and religious challenges of our day.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

National Socialism in the First Grade

Totalitarianism requires thought control. Consequently, such
a society has its gatekeepers controlling the flow of information. Adolph
Hitler had a lot to say on the subject:

In
every really great revolutionary movement propaganda will first have to
spread the idea of this movement. Thus, it will untiringly try to make
clear to the others the new train of thought, to draw them over to its own
ground, or at least to make them doubtful of their own previous conviction…The
organization receives its members from the followers in general won by
propaganda. (Mein Kampf)

Hitler understood that propaganda and mind control had to
include the nation’s youngest members. Western mind-controllers understand this
principle:

For a North Carolina first grader who wrote a touching
poem about her grandfather's military service in Vietnam,
everything was fine until she made a reference to God. At that point,
officials at West
Marion Elementary
School deleted the line before the 6-year-old
could read it aloud at a school assembly after a parent complained about
the religious reference. The line read, "He prayed to God for peace,
he prayed to God for strength."

Although this kind of censorship is justified by the concern
to not offend others, this is just a hypocritical ruse. If offending others was
truly their concern, they might have expressed some concern about offending
this first-grader. However, the secular authorities envision this little child
as Hitler had – as the object of indoctrination into the “new train of thought.”

This agenda separates children from their parents and the
child from his childhood, making the State into his primary custodian. After
all, the State knows what’s best about their children, while their parents are
mired by repressive God-myths!

In this case, it’s a matter of raising children for sexual
consumerism – children who would have no objection to any form of sexual
experimentation. I would guess that if this first-grader had instead reported
about his sexual feelings, his paper would have been used as a model for other
first-graders.