What do you all think about that man, Paul Hill, who killed the baby killer? You know the man who killed the abortionist with a shotgun and in turn gets murdered tonight.

Didn't someone "prove" that fetuses actually are alive at three months? I am under the impression that that was the defense of liberals when it came to abortion, "they are not yet alive, so it is OK to kill them".

Please post your thoughts.

Personally I believe that the man has some balls to be on death row and smile about the fact that he killed this man and his friend. If he felt so strongly about it, then maybe he should have killed them.

Abortion is a sore point with a lot of us here, but there are some differences of opinion even among WNists. It's a can of worms best left closed for now, since the only way to change it is to change public policies, which is what we want to do anyway.

As for Paul Hill, I'm sure some people might believe that he did the wrong thing for the right reasons, but it was still a misguided act, nevertheless. You can't stop abortion by killing abortionists or bombing clinics. You can only stop it by changing the law.

All these people who protest at abortion clinics - why aren't they protesting at their federal courthouse or federal office building? That's where the fault lies. The centers of power in this country do not exist at abortion clinics, nor are public policies decided by doctors who perform abortions. So, all in all, what he did was pretty useless and misguided.

Here is some food for thought. My friend has a rope with a noose tied on each end. He proclaims it's his symbol for the irony of capital punishment. He always uses Timothy McVeigh as an example. Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people and the government killed him. Who won? Nobody.

>>>Personally I believe that the man has some balls to be on death row and smile about the fact that he killed this man and his friend. If he felt so strongly about it, then maybe he should have killed them.

That's an em, interesting perspective. Would you apply such logic as a general principle to everyday situations? Like, if blacks feel strongly enough about killing/robbing whites they should do it? If so and so feels strongly enough about having sex with underage kids he should do it?

Abortion is a joke. Abortion is only good if a woman is raped. However, most women don't use it for that reason. They are either young girls that were a little too easy, stupid, or had no right to have sex to begin with.

If abortion was used the right way, I beleive most people wouldn't have an issue with it, but it's misused. Hill killed a cold-blooded killer, big deal.

People shy away from justifying murders of abortionists because it makes one seem cold and maybe even insane.

But I got to be honest, I don't see why I should care less about an innocent human fetus than for a man who devoted his life to the destruction of other human life. I don't really care if abortionists get 'aborted.' But if you make it your decision to kill abortionists, you must know the consequences and accept them. In this case, it was capital punishment.

Paul Hill (right or wrong) believed so much in his cause
that he was willing to risk his life & his freedom to make a difference. For anyone who doubts that he made one, research the time of the killing. How many abortion clinics were closed either temporarily or permanently, immediately after the shootings? Also how many docors got out of the killing business?
How many white babies may have been saved by this?
I lived a short distance from Pensacola at the time of the killing and I know that there were alot more clinics in operation in North East Florida than there are today.

Again, I don't support the killings but you have to respect the commitment. All change requires sacrifice.

I don't support his viewsand I don't support his actions, but I always try to see any argument from both sides. If I were to place myself in this person's shoes and watch the world from his eyes, I would see people killing babies. Would I be able to standby and do nothing?

I'm not justifying his actions and I don't support his cause, but the people trying to paint him as an "evil" man are just as wrong as he is. Neither side is trying to understand the other side's point and that's why they'll probably never resolve their issue.

EDIT: I do believe he's a murderer and should pay for his crime, was in no way trying to make his actions seem noble and right, I just think in order to solve an argument, you need to be willing to see both sides. I can see his side of the argument, doesn't mean I agree with it. Sorry for the edit.

Personally I believe that the man has some balls to be on death row and smile about the fact that he killed this man and his friend. If he felt so strongly about it, then maybe he should have killed them.

I think it is flat out amazing how the guy sits there and says "God will have a very special place for me in heaven for doing this". My mom who is deeply religious starts saying "No he wont" and I just tell her to hush up since she tried giving me the "God doesnt give anyone the right to kill" speech. Well maybe she should have thought about that when I told her then why did you support the Iraq war?

Anyways I wonder what is going to happen to the Abortion doctor killer who bombed the Olympics (1996?) and just recently got caught. He killed one person and it happened to be a black lady.

Did anyone notice that this Abortion killer who just recently faced death, well the abortion doctor actually had a body guard! He murdered both of them. A bodyguard, for petes sakes if these doctors werent wacko then why would they need bodyguards?