In the event that the Sykes-Picot Agreement created the modern Middle East, it is also at the heart of several intractable problems in the region. Despite how it was signed 100 years ago, the debate and controversy surrounding it are ongoing. It can be revised. As no genuine global agreement was reached among the 3 countries on that specific issue, a legal vacuum arose over time and caused many disputes or even babble of conflicts. A second Sykes-Picot agreement would want to redraw national borders in the area according to the realities in the floor and the interests of the main parties. The old Sykes-Picot agreement has to be addressed again.

Within my book, foreign policy is not an academic subject but, rather, an essential part of human history. In addition, it has been shown that the government in Baghdad is agonizingly weak. In four countries of the region, supposedly, it does not control significant portions of the state’s territory. The Iraqi government has no control over not less than a quarter of its territory.

America prevailed. The United States certainly does not. The United States and the United Kingdom are also pushing for Iraq to continue to maintain its territorial integrity in order to focus on the nation’s financial growth. The Islamic State does not accept different states, much less at the same level. The Arab state is crumbling in many cases.
Macmillan does a fantastic job considering the many things that made some of the decisions made during the Conference seem more reasonable. He also readily admits that the peacemakers made many mistakes. In addition to discussing the Council, it is important to provide the reader with descriptions of meeting places and how they are presented today.

The area of ??Palestine was supposed to be a world territory below the Agreement. Predicting the conclusion of the Arab state system became a favorite pastime. The end of the proxy war at the same time was the beginning of chaos. This passage helps define that theme, and offers a useful springboard from which to explore some contemporary geopolitical difficulties concerning territorial change.

At present, the invention of a cohesive Kurdish state is apparently a set of snakes and ladders. Similarly, Brexit practice is now about acquiring a deal, rather than relying on a shared rule framework. The aim of any new framework in international politics should be to reduce tensions and the likelihood of conflict. Understanding the Sykes-Picot agreement is important in identifying IS’s mission. Knowing that it is not likely to get international recognition, it is likely that the KRG will continue to maintain the fiction that it is part of Iraq, despite the fact that the majority of the Kurds would prefer to have an independent state. Only recognition of the presence of a Jewish state will result in real peace.

The human price of the First World War was terrible. The order based on rules seemed to be working so well that it could almost be taken for granted. Each time a new Sykes-Picot order is made, it is probably also related to that problem.