On August 7, a researcher at Queen’s University Belfast, Robert Elwood, announced that there is strong evidence that crustaceans—lobsters, crabs, shrimp, and other sea creatures—are quite capable of feeling pain. Hitherto, researchers have considered these animals to have only “nociception,” that is, a reflex that causes them to avoid a noxious stimulus of some sort. Writing with colleague Barry Magee in the Journal of Experimental Biology, Elwood instead holds that they learn from painful experiences, exhibiting learning behaviors that are “consistent with key criteria for pain experience and are broadly similar to those from vertebrate studies.” In other words, unless we’re prepared to throw a live cow or chicken into a stock pot, then we need to rethink our approach. continue reading…

Countless millions of people use anti-anxiety medications that, in the main, make daily life a bit more palatable. But where do those medications end up? Too often, in streams and other freshwater bodies, where, as you might imagine, they interact with the local fish populations.

And are the fish relaxed in the bargain? It turns out, Swedish researchers report, that in the case of European perch, at least, they’re not; writes Pam Belluck in The New York Times, they instead “became less social, more active and ate faster.” The implications remain to be seen, but given that the use of such medications has quadrupled in the last 20 years, they’re likely to be seen soon.

* * *

Adélie penguins live far away from sources of pharmacological pollution, but their world is changing, too. And, according to researchers at the National Science Foundation, the penguins are highly sensitive to that change, especially in sea ice conditions in Antarctica. Ironically, perhaps, whereas the wildlife of the Arctic is having to cope with too little ice, for the time being the penguins’ problem is that there is too much of it, since 12 years ago a huge iceberg broke off from the ice shelf and grounded against Ross Island, where it has since disrupted the summer meltoff of sea ice. Before the event, there were some 4,000 pairs of Adélie penguins in the region, whereas four years after that number had fallen by half. The scientists are now studying the behavior of “super breeders” that successfully produce offspring in consecutive years, which may shed light on future adaptations to environmental change.

There’s good reason for it to rest within our bones and brains. Writes science blogger Ed Yong in the latest number of Discover, a quarter of the men in the Agta tribe, a pygmy people of the Filipino rainforest, have been attacked by reticulated pythons, the world’s largest snakes. One poor fellow had had two encounters with the giants, which can extend to nearly 25 feet in length.

In fairness to the reticulated pythons, however, the Agta are, as Yong says, “proficient python-killers in their own right.” Yong provides a lively look at the science behind ophidian/primate encounters, eventualities that may just have sharpened our eyesight, evolutionarily speaking. You need good vision, after all, to spot a snake in the grass—or jungle. continue reading…

— Our thanks to the ALDF Blog, where this post originally appeared on November 21, 2011.

It’s about time, right? The Los Angeles Times recently reported that Allergan, the maker of Botox, had a process approved earlier this year by the Food and Drug Administration that will allow Allergan to test its product on cells in a lab dish, instead of having to test every batch on live animals.

Lab rat---courtesy ALDF Blog.

It took Allergan 10 years for its scientists to develop the test, but its success may allow Allergan to stop at least 95% of its animal testing within three years if the process is approved by all the other countries in which Botox is sold. According to the Times article, “The government says that every new compound people might be exposed to — whether it’s the latest wonder drug, lipstick shade, pesticide or food dye — must be tested to make sure it isn’t toxic. Usually, this requires animals. Allergan’s new test is one of several under development, or already in use, that could change that.” continue reading…

So it was when, a couple of weeks ago, the owner of a small game park in Ohio, recently freed from prison, decided that it would be a good idea to free his charges before killing himself. He did, and 17 lions, 18 Bengal tigers, bears, and wolves wandered out into the fields of Muskingum County, most remaining well within a quarter-mile of the property on which they had once been held captive. The county sheriff failed to read this seemingly not-to-be-missed sign that the animals were both confused and compliant, and he ordered his deputies to gun the animals down. Of the 56 animals that left the confines of the park, 44 animals were shot dead, while a wolf, a bear, and a tiger were later killed along nearby Interstate 70.

For reasons best known to himself, Jack Hanna, the former director of the Columbus Zoo, has defended the killings. Meanwhile, critics have pointed out that Ohio’s laws about the keeping of exotic animals had hitherto been virtually nonexistent. The dead man was known to have a history of animal neglect and cruelty, and yet somehow he managed to amass that doubly unfortunate menagerie. Ohio Republican governor John Kasich allowed an emergency order restricting the ownership of exotic animals signed last year by his Democratic predecessor to lapse precisely, it appears, because his predecessor was Democratic. He has hurried another executive order into existence, reports the New York Times directing state agencies to “increase inspections of places that may be housing exotic animals.” For the dead animals of Muskingum County, that’s much too little, and much too late. continue reading…

"Service Animal" Scammers (New Yorker): An increasing number of your neighbors have been keeping company with their pets in human-only establishments simply by claiming that the creatures are their licensed companion animals and are necessary to their mental well-being.