Thanks for the comments Eric.
On 6 Jul 2011, at 13:20, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>> ISSUE: Why two classes rr:PredicateMap and rr:RefPredicateMap? They behave exactly the same, we could drop the second
>
> I thought they had different properties (ref* vs. a smaller set of direct properties) and that the class differentiation was a didactic tool for the spec. There may be better ways to explain this. (ericP)
>
>> ISSUE: Why two properties for rr:predicateObjectMap and rr:refPredicateObjectMap? Better to have just one, and spot the difference by looking at the (ref)objectMap contained within
>
> I presume the same motivation and outcome as for the RefPredicateMap.
Ah, you're right; I was confused.
A RefPredicateMap can only be what is now called a â€œconstant-valued term mapâ€