> >>>>> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
> >> No objections. Maybe a footnote in section 2.2 "Defined EAPIs"?
>
> > Yes, that would be a good place. Could you please prepare a new
> > patch?
>
> Attached. Only change to previous version is addition of a footnote:
>
> \footnote{Another inofficial EAPI `kdebuild-1' was a series of
> extensions to EAPI `1' formerly used by the Gentoo KDE project.
> Some of its features have been included in EAPI `2' or later.}