On 09 Nov 2010 14:03, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2010, at 11:50 AM, John Curran wrote:
>> 2004: 29.00 /16s
>> 2005: 14.61 /16s
>> 2006: 14.01 /16s
>> 2007: 30.50 /16s
>> 2008: 8.45 /16s
>> 2009: 8.37 /16s
>> 2010*: 5.84 /16s (*through Oct 31, 2010)
>>>> Total: 110.78 /16s
> So in almost 7 years, we've reclaimed less than we gave Comcast last week.
>> Looks like a pretty small problem with minimal gain to me.
Keep in mind that's how much ARIN has reclaimed passively, i.e. based on
reports of fraud, or due to non-payment of annual fees.
There seems to be a fairly strong consensus that the numbers would be
significantly larger if ARIN were actively looking for abandoned or
unjustified resources.
Also, keep in mind that the goal is _not_ to reclaim a significant
amount of space, e.g. to extend the lifetime of IPv4, so how the
reclamation rate compares to the allocation/assignment rate is irrelevant.
S
--
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3646 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20101109/9633fda7/attachment.bin>