Friday, 4 March 2016

Vultures circling

As we
have shown in our past 2 posts, Kate has recently decided that
Madeleine is likely to be in the Praia da Luz area. We have stated the
reasons why we think she has said that.

However, a vociferous and
prolific twitter supporter seems to agree wholeheartedly that she
really means what she says.

The
abductor is a Portuguese paedophile, according to Mr Twitter.

Not only
that, but the authorities and the vile residents of PdL have hidden sex crimes to protect their
tourist industry!

Thanks to Scotland Yard, he says, these crimes have
been uncovered.

Residents of Praia da Luz, do you see vultures circling
overhead? How do you feel about this slur on your community?

2. Kate McCann & the Algarvian paedo

Returning
to our post “Paradise Lost?”, Bill Henderson, former consul, told Kate of a
meeting with tour operators in 2006, sharing their concerns about
paedophile activity, but wanting this to be kept confidential because of
possible repercussions for the trade.

Bill Henderson seemed remarkably
lacking in curiosity or concern about what had allegedly occurred and
didn’t consider the incidents relevant enough to come forward and make a
statement to the PJ.

Kate, on pages 323/4 of her book, describes looking
through the released PJ files. She must have had access to material not
available to the general public because information about sex offenders
was withheld.

“One of the most concerning and upsetting pieces of
information to emerge quite early was the record of sexual crimes
against children in the Algarve… I read of 5 cases of British children
on holiday being sexually abused in their beds whilst their parents
slept in another room. In 3 further incidents, children encountered an
intruder in their bedrooms, who was presumably disturbed before he had
chance to carry out an assault. I guess these were the reports that Bill
Henderson, the British consul at the time of Madeleine’s abduction had
told me about.These incidents had occurred within an hour’s
drive of Praia da Luz over the three years prior to Madeleine’s
disappearance. The PJ had never mentioned any of them to us. In fact, I
gathered from the files, some of them hadn’t even been recorded by the
authorities at the time they were reported (evidently, they were not
considered to be actual crimes). So they might never have come to light
if the parents of these children hadn’t been brave enough to come
forward to the British police after Madeleine was taken… What these
cases do demonstrate, however, is that British tourists in holiday
accommodation were being targeted..”

Kate says “some” of these attacks weren’t even recorded in the “files”, which we gather are the PJ Files. If “some” weren’t, then the others were. And if only “some” weren’t, means most were.

We fail to see any of these attacks registered in the PJ files.

Are they part of the pages that were removed from the files and placed in an Appendix still under the secrecy of justice?

- Category A, relate to people identified during the inquiry whose possible link to the events is extremely unlikely (the most tenuous) and whose right to privacy would be infringed if their personal information were left on file (basically the 'pervy percy' list);

- Category B, relate to crimestopper data with respect to sightings, the TV program having guaranteed anonymity;

- Category C , relate to information from people - often criminals or having a criminal history - that was volunteered by them and they should not be put at risk for having come forward.

If the registry of these sexual assaults were ever in the Files and were removed from them, they would have to be in Category A. Let’s look at the details of the pages removed from this category:

“Taking into account the content of erudite dispatch of fls 4655/4657,
and materialising, comes the MoPo (Ministério Público – Public Ministry)
to make to Your Honour know the following:

A - In the inquiry
there are passages that contain information that can contend with the
right to private life of people, not only British citizens, about which
there was not found the faintest hint of implication in the present
files as presented:Volume I, fls. 211/212: reference to an individual with a past linked to crimes of a sexual nature against children.Volume II- Fls. 293/297: constitutes a list of individuals connected with the practice of sex crimes against minors and teenagers.- Fls. 298/300: reference to an individual linked with the practice of acts of paedophilia and exhibitionism;- Fls. 473/474: reference to an individual linked with the practice of acts of exhibitionism.Volume III, fls. 754/757: information and bibliographic record of a citizen in connection with acts of paedophilia.

Volume
V, fls. 1246/1254: list resulting from the search carried out in the PJ
Database related to individuals of foreign nationality and linked with
child sexual abuse and paedophilia.

Volume XV- Fls.
4085/4100: reference to a Portuguese citizen having physical
similarities to the e-fit, with a police record showing convictions for
robbery, rape and kidnapping.- Fls. 4102/4110: identification of an English individual having physical similarities to the e-fit.-
Fls. 4116/4127: diligences done with an individual referenced with the
practice of one crime of sexual abuse against minors, with a police
record and convictions for that same crime.Volume XVI, fls. 4130/4132: reference to a French citizen with physical similarities to the portrait e-fit.

Regarding
the matter contained in the referred pages and for the reasons given,
because it’s our understanding we believe that it should remain in the
secrecy of justice, thus their removal, replacing them with a summary of
what was contained there [in each removed page] and the constitution of
an Appendix to remain in the custody of an entity considered competent
for its keeping, with the single purpose of demonstrating its existence,
in the terms expressed in Article 86 nº7 of the CPP.”

Is it plausible to believe that PJ would consider “the record of sexual crimes against children in the Algarve… I read of 5 cases of British children on holiday being sexually abused in their beds whilst their parents slept in another room” not having “the faintest hint of implication” to a case involving a girl allegedly abducted from her bedroom? We think it’s not.

Even if they were recorded, and they're not, in these removed pages, Kate wouldn’t be able to see them because they remain in the custody of the Portuguese Public Ministry under the secrecy of justice.

It couldn't have been from the PJ Files that Kate read about these sex attacks. She could be referring to the “Edgar Files”. These were the files shown to Kate by Dave Edgar as can be seen in the 2009 Mockumentary:

It can clearly be seen that a second statement from JW made in April 2007 is shown and there is no such statement in the PJ Files.

Also, it must have been from the “Edgar Files” that Kate has read what she says on page 56 of her book:

“It wasn’t until a year later, when I was combing through the Portuguese police files, that I discovered that the note requesting our block booking was written in a staff message book, which sat on a desk at the pool reception for most of the day. This book was by definition accessible to all staff and, albeit unintentionally, probably to guests and visitors, too. To my horror, I saw that, no doubt in all innocence and simply to explain why she was bending the rules a bit, the receptionist had added the reason for our request: we wanted to eat close to our apartments as we were leaving our young children alone there and checking on them intermittently.”

Kate is getting her files confused, There is no such “staff message book” with such a “note requesting our block booking” in the PJ Files.

3. Scotland Yard & the Algarvian paedo

In our post “Blackmail”, we
wrote about the alleged sex attacks in the Algarve and the role/act
being played out by Scotland Yard in 2014. Not for a minute did we
believe this was a serious attempt to solve the case as the result of
some revelatory moment for Scotland Yard. The fact that Portugal was denied to
right to screen Crimewatch was enough to convince us.

What we failed to
do, however, was revisit old articles, as so much of this case is
recycled and re-spun news. What Kate’s words do demonstrate to us is
that Redwood and his team were highly unlikely to be investigating any
cases, they had uncovered themselves.

Let’s first remind ourselves of the remit of Operation Grange in 2011.

“The focus of the review will be material held by 3 main stakeholders (and in the following order of primacy) - The Portuguese Law Enforcement agencies- The UK Enforcement agencies- Other private investigation agencies/staff and organisations”

The
removal of boxes from Metodo 3 offices in Spain must be related to the
third category. M3 get a positive comment from Kate in her book
- although this was before the recent revelations of Peribanez and
Tamarit and their allegations of fraud by M3.

4. Dave Edgar & the Algarvian paedo

Halligen gets a
very negative review, as would be expected, but of Dave Edgar and Arthur
Cowley… not a single mention by name, unless this counts.

Page 284

“For
the most part though, our experiences with independent investigators
have been good. Our current tried and tested team has more or less been
in place, with a few modifications, since October 2008. It is
spearheaded by a former police officer with input from strategic
advisers and specialists in various fields as required.”

There is
no mention of the embarrassing Victoria Beckham look-alike episode in
Barcelona; which Edgar failed to investigate other than in the most
cursory fashion.

Scotland Yard, however, have a brief to
investigate Edgar and Cowley and Alpha Investigation Group (1). And
therein may lie another clue to the Sex Offenders in the Algarve
episode.

“And despite fresh leads taking his probe to Australia and Barcelona, the east Belfast man insists the golden-haired youngster is being held just 10 miles from where she was snatched in Praia da Luz two years ago.”

Edgar proposes 2 years before Operation Grange was put in place that Madeleine is being held in a dungeon or cellar, just 10
miles from where she was snatched, in a sprawling wilderness. Very
specific, but based on what information?

Andy Redwood’s
introduction of Crèche-Dad on Crimewatch undermines Edgar’s other
assertion that Madeleine was taken by the man seen by Jane Tanner, seen carrying a little girl in a blanket. Dave says this in the article:

“Jane is a very reliable witness and there were other sightings of this man, who Jane saw carrying a little girl in a blanket, in the days leading up to the disappearance.”.

According to Redwood on Crimewatch, the man was taking his daughter home from the night crèche, albeit seen
walking in a different direction to that which would be logical by someone coming from said crèche (Discrepancy 11 of our post “UK Crimewatch - Discrepancies II”).

Edgar
also adds a touch of xenophobia by referring to the “lawless villages”
in the area, as if the Algarve was the equivalent of the Wild West. No
investigation would be complete without a negative inference directed
towards the PJ.

He then gives two very different scenarios: a
paedophile or a desperate family. So desperate they were willing to risk
taking a child and then hiding her in a cellar! Even daft Dave must
have realised how absurd that must have seemed, so he elaborates on the
paedophile angle.

“He added there were as many as nine child sex attacks in the area round Praia da Luz from 2005 to 2007 and the victims included British kids.

Some happened as close as 20 miles from Praia da Luz, and six of them were on girls between the ages of three and 10”.

5. Conclusion

When Redwood mentioned investigating sex
attacks on girls, was this merely following the “leads” Scotland Yard
found in the “Edgar Files”? If it was, then why hadn’t Edgar report these
attacks to the PJ, if not already reported?

Scotland Yard announced their
investigation into the sex attacks as if they had discovered this spree
themselves. Someone on Twitter should stop being lazy and do some research.

Given Kate’s description of what she found in the files and
Edgar’s investigation, did they really find anything that hadn’t been
known up to 2009?

Mr Twitter will, of course, assert that they
did. He knows it was a Portuguese Paedophile wot did it!

Scotland Yard
circled Praia da Luz in 2014, in helicopters. Do the vultures now detect
their prey in Praia da Luz? Mr Twitter and Kate are certainly pointing
in that direction.

Our opinion, and we’re sure shared by many;
it’s not a Portuguese paedophile in a lawless village the vultures
should be circling.

They should instead circle some so called normal people, not paedophiles who don’t exist, of that small beach village in Portugal and many locations throughout the UK.

We have said up to now that there were only 2 options for the conclusions of Operation Grange. However, we have come to realise that there’s a third option. We will speak about that option next week.

(1) actually called Alphaig
and dissolved in November 2011. Only Cowley’s name was given as a
director. Edgar’s company we believe was Emerald Investigations Sept
2009- July 2014.

Post Scriptum 07Mar16:

Our post “Carman” explained how private forensic tests were allegedly
done in the property of John Garaghty, someone who had been confused to
be another man all these years.

This was followed by our “A Triumph of Tycoons” in which we showed how “Mr [Stephen] Winyard
revealed he has already paid for DNA tests carried out on the Renault
Scenic hire car used by the McCanns.”

Stephen Winyard was one of 3 tycoons which we referred to in that post. The other 2 were Sir Richard Branson and Brian Kennedy:

“The businessman agreed to offer an initial sum of £100,000 - a figure matched by Virgin tycoon Sir Richard Branson.Double-glazing magnate Brian Kennedy is also donating money to help the McCanns clear their name.Mr
Winyard said the three were sharing the costs between them. "I think
the McCanns are entitled to the best legal defence they can muster to
refute these scurrilous allegations.”

In our post “Tide Change”
we spoke again of Mr Winyard, this time because Kate McCann received an
award with his name given by Missing People.

On this post we added a Post
Scriptum because an Anonymous reader provide us with a link
that took us to a swingers website page where a swinger asked the
following: “A swinger, saying the following “Hi we are staying at stobo
castle 19th feb looking for some company. Anyone around or can point us
in the right direction? Cheers”

As we all know by now, Stobo Castle is owned by Stephen Winyard.

Today,
we received another comment from another (or maybe the same one?)
reader sending a link to an article from The Independent.

“And
we could take as our text for worrying about it no less an authority
than that Sixties marvel, Richard Branson himself. As his wife Joan says
about him, the Virgin boss has always had weaknesses for "sticky cake
and beautiful women" (with Bill Clinton it is, of course, the other way
around).In his autobiography Branson tells how he lost his first
wife, Kristen, to the rock star Kevin Ayers, as the result of a
wife-swapping party. Described, inevitably, in yesterday's Adultery
News, the setting was his "romantic houseboat in London's Little Venice.
Cushions were scattered on the floor. The scene was set for swapping
and seduction." And, apparently, alliteration. Nevertheless, all readers
of Adultery News now know to avoid houseboats with floor cushions.”

Like we did with our Post Scriptum on “Tide Change” post we will simply ask readers: what do you make of this?

28 comments:

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

You refer to Crimewatch not being allowed a screening in Portugal. I can state, categorically, that Redwood promised the Crimewatch material to an RTE programme in Ireland, which was not his gift as it was owned by the BBC. The BBC itself resented being pulled into this/these promises by Redwood, and wouldn't allow their footage to be used, or edited. Instead Redwood did an interview in studio.

Yes, that is a problem. No matter how much we trust the site, that is just a site saying that John Hill is the manager.

"JOHN HILLJOHN HILL (Manager of the Mark Warner Ocean Club)the manager at the Mark Warner resort, John Hill, said there was no definite physical evidence that the girl had been abducted. "It's still questionable as to whether it's an abduction," he said. "We are hoping that Madeline is found as soon as possible and safe and well." Mr Hill said the police had been doing all they could. He said around 60 staff and guests at the complex had searched until 4.30am while police notified border police, Spanish police and airports. "There is a criminal investigator here in charge of the situation and around 20 officers but unfortunately there is still no information,"

However, the documentation handed over by the Ocean Club to the PJ, in which all their employees are listed (even one in handwriting) John Hill is not in it.

"John Hill says he “works in the Ocean Club since March 2006” and is identified in his statement as manager of the “Ocean Club - Praia da Luz - Lagos” and yet he doesn't appear on the Ocean Club staff list.

Some witnesses refer to him being the MW manager in Luz. Yet he doesn't appear in the Mark Warner staff list.

Anyone know why?

Maybe for the same reason as why his wife, Donna Hill, doesn't appear in either list too. Donna who we remind readers, says on May 4 2007 that she is the MW Childcare coordinator."

What you are telling us, we already knew.

However you haven't answered our question, what is the professional link between John Hill and the Ocean Club?

While we wait for you to answer our question, let us answer yours which was "why did John hill say there was no sign of a break in if the OC wanted to participate in the cover up ?"

Well, we don't know what you are talking about.

On the SIC report at 20:00 of May 4th, John Hill can be seen and heard saying the following 01:08 – 01:22 of the vídeo):

“Nothing is missing in the apartment, one of the windows at the back here into the chidrens’ room was left ajar with a blind had been risen up where previously the window was closed and the blind was down.”

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id121.html

Isn't that describing a break-in?

Are you saying he later changes his mind about this? Why would he? He was one of the first on the scene, he certainly saw the window with the "blinds risen up"...

Your comment got caught up in the "debate" about John Hill. We have taken the liberty to delete it there and place it here:

"Anonymous 4 Mar 2016, 15:03:00

I haven't really understood what you are trying to say in this post. I'm an avid reader in your blog and certainly subscribe to your theory but other than feeling very disheartened today at what I've read, I probably have not understood the message.. my lack of brain not yours!So other than truth (or partial truth) or archive there is another feasible option for OG. That doesnt sound encouraging. If the vultures are back circling PdL re sex offenders then do you mean to say that OG is now fixated on finding closure with a dead body and putting it down to a paedophile attack? Please lift my spirits if you can..."

Yes, we have seen a third option forming and growing some legs. Obviously it's neither archival or truth.

We are currently working on detailing it and on debunking it.

We can show something that will be in next week's post:

"As we have repeatedly said, we think there are only 2 realistic options for the conclusion Operation Grange can come to: truth or archival.

But that doesn’t mean there aren’t other options. Obviously there are, but for us all of them have varying degrees of fantasy and some even go over the scale but are options nonetheless. An option may be ridiculous but is never stupid. Stupidity is an exclusive of those who chose to take ridiculous options."

The idea of next week's post is to show how ridiculous other options outside truth or archival are.

Why would John Hill be manager? A manager deals most with staff (great deal Portuguese) and suppliers (Portuguese). The resort manager was the Portuguese Silvia Baptista. She was called for questioning wasn't she?

Hi Textusa, thank you for the latest post,it is quite remarkable that Mr and Mrs John,Donna Hill references of their roles at the Ocean Club Complex were altered so quickly after the disappearance of Madeleine McCann?Another point to consider is the mysterious Twitter blogger the same"Michael Walker" who was so helpful to the McCann family in their moment of support since Madeleine's reported disappearance 3 May 2007?Was that you on the beach near the rocks with Gerald, as per the photographs from the news papers, eh Michael,official scrutineer of the internet, paid from the "Find Madeleine Fund"?

Hi Textusa, I have just read the post scriptum,this is not proof of "Swinger Activity"as nontextusa would ascribe,but it has inclinations that Elite Members of Society do wish to partake in their own predlections of their choice and not wishing for it to be broadcast to the publics knowledge?

Like we did with the Post Scriptum of our post "Tide change", in which we made no allegation against Stephen Winyard, with this one we are also not making any allegation against Sir Richard Branson or anyone else.

We have limited ourselves to publishing 2 paragraphs of an article.

Our intention is for readers to ask and then answer their own questions.

Well done Textusa there had to be a link between all these people who immediately jumped to the macs defense.

I wonder if you also noticed that " rent a Bob" geldof who was linked to the gala for the presentation of Kate's missing people's award was one of the few names disclosed as having attended the Murdock marriage blessing

Hi Textusa,there seems to be some collusion of knowledge between Resonate and Bell Pottinnger with regard to the access they were able to control photographic SD/CD discs, cards to the PJ Authorties with proof of three persons having knowledge,handling thsese items,one likes Green ink,"Ask the Dogs, Sandra and one who claimed to have arrived on the 5 May 2007 but was their as a PR man on the 4 May 2007?

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Total Pageviews

As of Jan 19 2019 we're waiting for Jules to own the blog.

MESSAGE to NEWCOMERS

This blog believes that concerning the MADDIE McCANN case the following happened:

- Maddie McCanndied in the early evening of May 3rd, 2007, in the Apartment 5A. We believe the death to have been accidental.

- At the time of Maddie's death the Praia da Luz's Ocean Club was hosting a large swinging holiday (which we believe took place in various locations in and around Praia da Luz - from Lagos to Sagres) in which the McCanns and friends were part of among many others.

- After Maddie's death a cover-up of unseen proportions and scope took place not to hide Maddie's death but with the main purpose of hiding the presence of swinging. To achieve that, Maddie's death had to be hidden.

- We don't believe there was any sort of negligence involved in the Maddie affair. We don't believe that T9 dined at Tapas Bar from Sunday to Wednesday. We think that on those nights they left their children with professional nannies - as did other guests - to go dine downtown PdL. On Thursday night they did use Tapas but that was simply part of what was to be "negligence"that was required to allow Maddie to be "abducted."

PJ Files

Anonymity

A MAJOR MINORITY

TRUTH is Self-Sustained

Think for yourself

Luz - THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

Maybe because you can always enjoy an ice-cream in the rain?And a dip in an icy pool on arrival always attracts a crowd.Textusa 11Nov 2013 12:28:00

I like the Tapas fragile chairs and tables. They wobble nicely when cutting thick grilled steaks spilling the drinks all about! It's fun for the whole family!Anonymous 11Nov 2013 13:08:00

And how about the number of men seen carrying little blond girls in the street in the middle of the night?Anonymous 11Nov 2013 14:04:00

PdL - where families take it in turn to vomit each night, dog packs pursue and bite joggers, guests fall off catamarans, damage tendons playing tennis, have shaving accidents and stagger around apartments bleeding, domestic appliances need repair, shutters jam, baby monitors won't function at restaurants, travel cots can't be assembled.. sounds like THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED.Anonymous 12 Nov 2013 12:37:00

Child Catcher

Algarve - THE REGION OF THE DAMNED

“Algarve – Where Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’s Child Catcher found it ideal to roam the streets with his GYPSY-wagon:“There are children here somewhere. I can smell them. Come along, kiddie-winkies!”Algarve, the REGION OF THE DAMNED.”

Please Reconstruct I:

PJ's Declaration for Reopening Process:

"Madeleine McCann

As is the case with any situation in which a child goes missing, notwithstanding formal dismissal of the inquiry into her disappearance, and just as has always been publicly stated, the Polícia Judiciária never stopped paying close attention to any and all information that might possibly shed light on the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and the identity of the perpetrator(s).

It was with this goal in mind that in March 2011 the National Director of the Polícia Judiciária entrusted a team of investigators from the North Directorate with the mission of reassessing, as a whole, the vast amount of information gathered during the inquiry, aimed at identifying data for which a more in-depth investigation might be useful and possible.

The reassessment which took place over the last two years and a half suggested new evidence to have surfaced, which, requiring the investigation to proceed, meets the requirements set out by section 279(1) of the Portuguese Code of Criminal Procedure for reopening of the inquiry.

Accordingly, a request for reopening was made to the Public Prosecutor for the jurisdiction of Portimao, and approval granted by the latter. "

The Anne Guedes Transcriptions

Permanent Suggested Reading

Quote

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Mark Twain

Revelations

"For the righteous, a revelation is a joyous event, the realization of a divine truth but for the wicked, revelations can be far more terrifying, when dark secrets are exposed and sinners are punished for their trespasses." Quote from the TV Series "Revenge" (T2 - Ep9)

Truth

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.Arthur Schopenhauer

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.Winston Churchill

The Revolution

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.George Orwell

The Revolution Goes Viral

"Once information networks become social, the implications are massive: truth can now travel faster than lies, and all propaganda becomes instantly flammable. Sure, you can try to insert spin, but the instantly networked consciousness of millions of people will set it right: they act like white blood cells against infection so that ultimately the truth, or something close to it, persists much longer than disinformation"The Guardian (04Jan12)

We must build dikes of courage to hold back the flood of fear. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts Winston Churchill

PRECIOUS, SO TRUE, WORDS

“One coincidence, two coincidences – maybe they’re still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence.”

Kate McCann

(in MADELEINE, by Kate McCann, published in 2011 by Bantam Press, pg. 328)

Imagine...

"This says it all, Ms Loach hit the nail on the head!

"Ms Loach replied: “Imagine the public believing that you covered up your child’s death and then sought to make money out of it. They feel shame, humiliation and anguish."

Yes, that's exactly what we, the public, believe, because that's exactly what they did! And, their "shame, humiliation and anguish" are because they know we know!"

Comment posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Sep 16, 2013, 8:36:00 AM on "McCann vs Amaral Libel Trial" post referring to Mockumentary maker Emma Loach's testimony on the 1st day of said trial as one of McCann's defense witness.

Legal Disclaimer

This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and of opinions, between WHITE HATS, so is not responsible for the use, misuse or any form of interpretation (mainly misinterpretation) of its content, as although it uses a public medium, as is the internet, it's of PRIVATE nature, very much like any other conversation that takes place in a restaurant, pub or any other public location, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised.

Sound Explanation for Viciousness

Compliments from the Maggots' Lair:

- “…all the others pale into insignificance when compared to textusa.”

- “I think she should be on the streets and off the internet"

Chinagirl):

- “Disgusting piece of slime.”

(Raptor):

- “Yikes ! That's disgusting.”

(preciousramotswe):

- “You are right. It's a shambolic mess of vitriol and obtuseness. But then they always are. The one that some claimed finally 'proved' who was carrying who during the Smith sighting is a masterpiece of deliberately confused arguments in which labrynthine plots are used to cover how empty the central thesis is”

Out of the Blue (or... Black?)

Hey textusa How are you? well I hope,just thought I would tell you that there are videos about you on youtube, claiming you are an internet predator who stole her daughters identity and prowls the forums for young boys, they say you are welsh!! I think its a case of mistaken identity because are you not portuguese and male? Anyway great blog. keep it up.(Anon., Nov 13th, 05:43)

Conversation from the "Lightless Zone"

sabot:

“Wot Round Table?”

bonnybraes1:

“He/she/it invented a barking mad 'theory' about no-one actually having eaten in the Tapas, because he/she/it couldn't grasp the table arrangements.”

So, because textusa doesn't understand stuff like that, all the Tapas group, the staff, everyone, were lying.

OMG - you don't suppose textusa is actually Gonc, do you?”

sansouci:“Could be Bonny.

The 'theories' about the table and the watersports are really so far beyond bizarre, that I get the feeling that 'textusa' could actually be 'pisstaka'.”

BLACK BUT TRUE WORDS

“Because no-one is more vicious in their search for payback that those who realise they have allowed themselves to be taken for a fool” (A "boomerang" comment left by an Anonymous (Insane?) at Sep 22, 2012 2:06:00 PM)

Insane's IMPORTANT Comments

“…How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment”

Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM

“…Where is your sense of shame or decency in accusing innocent witnesses of being involved in covering up the death of a child?

I see no shame or decency on here - just an utter indifference to the rights or feelings of others.

I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - if you were a witness to a crime and some deranged cow on the internet accused you of being involved. You are all a complete disgrace.”

Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM

FOOT IN THE MOUTH DISEASE

Insane (Nov 14, 2012 11:37:00 PM):

Oh look here - amazing what one can find out by means of a couple of emails to Mark Warner.

You are toast, lady. Finished.

I am going to enjoy this more than is actually decent.

Textusa (Nov 15, 2012 8:50:00 AM):

Well it seems that you're quite privy with the Ocean Club aren't you?

Them giving YOU the information about their own mails?

And you threatening us based on information that YOU apparently got from the Ocean Club.

That's really interesting, isn't it?

Insane (Nov 15, 2012 10:47:00 PM):

One thing I really like about Mark Warner is how helpful their staff are. Really go the extra mile for someone needing information. IYKWIM

:)

Textusa (Nov 16, 2012 11:17:00 AM):

Thank you for confirming that Mark Warner Staff are supplying YOU with information pertaining the Maddie Affair.

Insane's Moment of Rare Beauty

“It would be more suspicious if every account tallied. Police expect to find contradictions, don't tell me you did not know this?” (Nov 22, 2012 3:38:00 PM), when providing an opinion on contradictions from various statements in the PJ Files.

“I don't give a rat's arse about the statements which tally too closely - of course some of them tally too closely, there is an in depth analysis of them on my blog, the one you are not invited to.” (Nov 22, 2012 4:08:00 PM), when, exactly 30 minutes later, provides an opposite opinion, in this case about the fact that some of Tapas' Staff's statements tally too closely.

Insane the Entrepeneur?

"I'd love to stay, but I have a report to write, and it won't do itself, will it?" (Nov 29, 2012 8:14:00 PM)Insane the Disruptor, a new profession shown inNew Career Opportunities

Insane's Proposal for a New Legal Disclaimer

Textusa's new disclaimer. Please ignore all previous versions

''This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and opinions between people who have sniffed WAY too many solvents, and the imaginary people who live at the bottom of their garden, and so is not responsible for the enormous fines, possible imprisonment, or lifelong incarceration in a mental hospital which may result from it's content, as although it is on the interclickyweb, it is of a private nature, accompanied only by the voices in their heads, very much like any other conversation which takes place in a psychiatric ward between people rocking backwards and forwards in their seat and eating the wallcoverings, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised in the half hour per day of free association which the inmates are allowed.''Comment NOT published but submitted on Aug 22, 2011 10:17:00 PM

Kate's Round Table

INSANE'S BLOG

We waited so long for the link...

A possible explanation for the wait: "As I have made perfectly clear, you and your sort will never have access to my blog. We are particular about who we invite, and would not include screaming harpies and riff-faff like yourself."unpublished comment from Insane at Nov 23, 2012 10:55:00 AM

Then, a glimmer of hope?“Publishing elsewhere the posts Textusa refuses to publish is also appropriate - and also gives you fools a chance to read what she withholds from you, knowing that you would desert her if you were aware of how much trouble she leads you into.” (Nov 29, 2012 12:40:00 PM)

No, it wasn’t to be so… :“For the last time, you will never be provided with a link for my blog - you are not welcome there and will never be given access”(Nov 29, 2012 1:38:00 PM)