I am thinking about my observations seeing the Mexican invasion of Texas, Arizona, California, and Colorado. It seems that when a sizable invasion moves into an area, the community is broken and people withdraw into their subgroups based on where they work, who they grew up with, etc. Since there is no common community anymore, all social cohesion stops and it is virtually impossible to make new connections. At that point, everyone is stuck in the same circle of people they went to high school with. Whites do not simply disengage from the invading horde, they disengage from all others uniformly, including other whites.

Women respond by becoming angry, without really knowing why, and feminism redirects that angers towards white men. Since there is no faith in the men who failed to stop the invasion, or the future of society, women instinctively become barren. They stop going out because they are in fear of aggressive brown men (just like how Turks have killed the nightlife in eastern Europe).

What we are seeing in the "diverse" areas of the country is total social breakdown of whites, as defined below:
-Birth rate falls below level required to sustain population.
-Impossibility to make new romantic and social connections.
-Poor health of individuals (70% overweight, rising death rates due to drugs and suicide).
-Disengagement from society; the community does not come together for fairs, festivals, etc. because the invading force crashes the party and causes trouble. Increasing exclusiveness of private parties and events, in order to keep the undesirables out, but applied equally to other whites who are not yet in the social clique.

We have a generation of young white upper middle class men living on the east and west coasts who are evolutionary dead ends. There is no winning move or way you can self-improve to beat this. The outcome is certain, and the coasts are a place of white death and extinction. Within the United States, the only solution might be to move deep into flyover country, and I mean DEEP. Utah, Colorado, Texas, and other states are getting hit hard with the Mexican zombie horde, so whites there disengage completely and do not talk to strangers.

The key concept here is it isn't enough to have other white people around you to interact with. You need an absence of nonwhites in order for whites to let their guard down and relax. When foreign invasion occurs, whites put their guard up against the incoming invaders, but also against any other whites they are not already intimately familiar with. There is research that supports this theory:https://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/worl ... 86248.html

The map below basically shows, in orange and red, places a white man will have a very hard time making friends or dating women:

Here is another map showing non-hispanic whites. If you are not in one of the dark blue areas your community probably has low social cohesion:

The research sounds interesting. I had a conversation once with a PhD student, now an assistant or associate professor, probably, who was into institutional theory, a subset of sociology. He said there was research that diversity encourages creativity and innovation, which goes along with research I have read. But he had a theory that uniformity led to more efficient organizations. The Nazis might be a good example of this. The military tries to create unity and cohesion through emotionally breaking recruits in boot camp. Recruits to the marines, for exmaple, may be from diverse backgrounds, but the process does give them a common identity as marines.

I wonder if the picture you paint is overly bleak and if there are too many variables just to blame all these ills on diversity and imigration. For example, a lot of people withdrew from normal social interaction as TV become popular. People did not hang out on the front porch, for example, or spend as much time at community events. As much of the population moved to cities and spent time indoors, social networks revolved around work and school, and not who you lived next to. An exception might be children who played outside in the cities, but TV, video games, and now all the online entertainment, combined with crime and safety issues that could motivate parents to keep kids indoors discourage kids from meeting other kids outside. Some of the disconnectedness may have a lot to do with people seeking online social interaction instead of conventional social interaction. Racial diversity may drive people to be more disconnected.

I am also wondering if social disconnect correlates strongly with decline in church participation in some communities.

remember, it was the boomers who said "We NEED brown people to do the jobs that white people won't!" I heard this f***ing bullshit line hundreds of times from white people over the past 3 decades.

Well, I hope you boomers enjoy the retirement homes. Those same brown people make up like 50% of the staff at hospitals and retirement homes. And in almost every case where old white people are getting abused, it's a brown employee doing it.

Godspeed, brown people! You are doing the jobs that we whites are too lazy to do, like punishing the shitty boomers for destroying America.

And oh yea, brown women are awesome.

___________________________________________________________________
i'm literally bulletproof, for real. My friend shot a gun at me and the bullet bounced right off me.

remember, it was the boomers who said "We NEED brown people to do the jobs that white people won't!" I heard this f***ing bullshit line hundreds of times from white people over the past 3 decades.

Well, I hope you boomers enjoy the retirement homes. Those same brown people make up like 50% of the staff at hospitals and retirement homes. And in almost every case where old white people are getting abused, it's a brown employee doing it.

Godspeed, brown people! You are doing the jobs that we whites are too lazy to do, like punishing the shitty boomers for destroying America.

And oh yea, brown women are awesome.

No, it wasn't. "The Silent Generation" and "The Greatest Generation" are the ones who passed that. Now it's the socialist Millennials who keep parroting that line.

I think it's more of a stupidity type thing, although I find in general young white women to be the most attractive for wanting to bond and form families but from my reading it has been established if you want to live in a first world country you need an IQ average of around 100.

Take the Ashkenazi Jews for instance, the real ones with the genetic markers going back a ways on average have an IQ of around 110. I do not know whether to trust this information or not because these people have also warped all the information we have been fed but it seems they have checked out from other groups and it could be because they have little in common with them mentally.

I find as America becomes stupider and stupider and more socialist because socialism caters to stupidity there are very few people I can communicate with and the ones I can realize to really watch their behavior so they do not offend the idiots in their daily dealings.

I don't think people with an IQ of say 110 or 120 will have much in common long term with people who have an IQ of say 85. I think this is all being done on purpose to lower the IQ dramatically in white countries so the inhabitants are easily controlled by the people who created socialism the Ashkenazi Jewish financial class.

I just find the intelligent people isolate themselves and most by far are white males.

Last edited by Moretorque on October 16th, 2018, 10:55 pm, edited 4 times in total.

I am thinking about my observations seeing the Mexican invasion of Texas, Arizona, California, and Colorado. It seems that when a sizable invasion moves into an area, the community is broken and people withdraw into their subgroups based on where they work, who they grew up with, etc. Since there is no common community anymore, all social cohesion stops and it is virtually impossible to make new connections. At that point, everyone is stuck in the same circle of people they went to high school with. Whites do not simply disengage from the invading horde, they disengage from all others uniformly, including other whites.

Women respond by becoming angry, without really knowing why, and feminism redirects that angers towards white men. Since there is no faith in the men who failed to stop the invasion, or the future of society, women instinctively become barren. They stop going out because they are in fear of aggressive brown men (just like how Turks have killed the nightlife in eastern Europe).

What we are seeing in the "diverse" areas of the country is total social breakdown of whites, as defined below:
-Birth rate falls below level required to sustain population.
-Impossibility to make new romantic and social connections.
-Poor health of individuals (70% overweight, rising death rates due to drugs and suicide).
-Disengagement from society; the community does not come together for fairs, festivals, etc. because the invading force crashes the party and causes trouble. Increasing exclusiveness of private parties and events, in order to keep the undesirables out, but applied equally to other whites who are not yet in the social clique.

We have a generation of young white upper middle class men living on the east and west coasts who are evolutionary dead ends. There is no winning move or way you can self-improve to beat this. The outcome is certain, and the coasts are a place of white death and extinction. Within the United States, the only solution might be to move deep into flyover country, and I mean DEEP. Utah, Colorado, Texas, and other states are getting hit hard with the Mexican zombie horde, so whites there disengage completely and do not talk to strangers.

The key concept here is it isn't enough to have other white people around you to interact with. You need an absence of nonwhites in order for whites to let their guard down and relax. When foreign invasion occurs, whites put their guard up against the incoming invaders, but also against any other whites they are not already intimately familiar with. There is research that supports this theory:https://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/worl ... 86248.html

The map below basically shows, in orange and red, places a white man will have a very hard time making friends or dating women:

Here is another map showing non-hispanic whites. If you are not in one of the dark blue areas your community probably has low social cohesion:

Hispanics are pretty chill and the women are far easier to date than the average non-Hispanic white. They also tend to have a solid proportion of more attractive women that are willing to date down, opening up a lot of opportunities if you're not a bigot or racist

Yes. The proper way to state this is as "dumb and dumber" ("no pun intended" to the 1994 U.S. movie nor to you, Mr.MoreTorque or is it "Mr. Torquer N' Torquer") as it is a comparative ONE syllable thay deserves the "-er" gerund in lieu of a TWO syllable comparative that deserves "more". In addendum, if a person must use "stupid" as a comparative, then "more stupid" would serve the late Queen Elizabeth justice in her grave. Toast.