Iwog is the number one most liked personality on Patnet. He has a ratio of one like for each 3.5 posts he made. Strangely bipolar rentier/liberal at times it is difficult to see where he is coming from. I like him on occasion. He is entertaining but at times a bit vulgar.

Speaking of vulgarity; Apocalypse is the number two most liked and number one most loved personality on Patnet. He has a way of saying things that would make anyone else look like a sick and twisted individual. I suspect he was hurt really bad by a realtor at sometime and it made him snap. I like him for his brutal honesty and succinct way of putting things in perspective.

Dan, at number three most liked has an orderly, well researched style that is often convincing. He sincerely seems to want to help people understand the truth. He is also in the top twenty most disliked.

Capshudup fourth most liked. I have liked him on many occasions but I am not sure he should be encouraged.

Politico? 121212? Who likes them so much?

Roberto is coming up fast. He is in the top twenty most liked on Patnet. I like him. If he could show some humility and have patience, or ignore, those he feels are his inferiors he would be better recognized for his investment decisions. In spite of his personality disorders we like him anyway.

Like ‘em or not you have to appreciate all of the characters on Patnet!

@ellie,
this new nerd turd poster is trying for a particular persona, and obviously it (the persona) must hate femanine personas too. It must be an important perst of the super educated, hertophobic liberal persona the poster is trying for. I would not take anything posted by this persona seriously. It's an obvious joke or ploy.

@CptnShudup,
In America those like you come against on here have chosen bellum internecinum for all that do not agree with them. Load heavy.

"Even higher qualifications" would have mattered if you were referring to something you need to be qualified for... such as a job, or the Miss America Pagent.

But here, in patnet world, your degrees don't matter to us. What would matter is something awesome, such as the ability to effectively communicate your thoughts. You're falling short of this goal in a dramatic fashion.

By the way, "comprehension" isn't a qualification. It's the "capacity of the mind to perceive and understand; power to grasp ideas..." (Dictionary.com). Based on your posts, you are severely lacking in this area - so I believe that I'm speaking for many of us when I say that you might want to change the resume if you've listed it as one of your qualifications.

Frankly, I'm flattered that you've become such a fan of mine that you believe you possess direct knowledge of my ability to "misquote" and "misguide" this forum. Seeing as how I quoted you directly without editorializing, a better description of my abilities might be that I possess the ability to select & quote in such a unique way that you get a little turned on.

But here, in patnet world, your degrees don't matter to us. What would matter is something awesome, such as the ability to effectively communicate your thoughts. You're falling short of this goal in a dramatic fashion.

Ignore really does work.

Since thedaytoday put his "last word" in I have decided to ignore his persona.

His persona was vile. Often profane and adds little to the debate.

I appreciate someone who can debate me, try to persuade me, and show me the error of my ways. Attack my stupid ideas and clear me of my ignorance. Don't call me a stupid A-hole without providing convincing evidence.

But here, in patnet world, your degrees don't matter to us. What would matter is something awesome, such as the ability to effectively communicate your thoughts. You're falling short of this goal in a dramatic fashion.

Ignore really does work.

Since thedaytoday put his "last word" in I have decided to ignore his persona.

His persona was vile. Often profane and adds little to the debate.

I appreciate someone who can debate me, try to persuade me, and show me the error of my ways. Attack my stupid ideas and clear me of my ignorance. Don't call me a stupid A-hole without providing convincing evidence.

No, you don't. You simply delete posts that show you to be wrong as evidenced by your ridiculous 9/11 thread.

I appreciate someone who can debate me, try to persuade me, and show me the error of my ways. Attack my stupid ideas and clear me of my ignorance. Don't call me a stupid A-hole without providing convincing evidence.

No, you don't. You simply delete posts that show you to be wrong as evidenced by your ridiculous 9/11 thread.

And you, Mr Bigsby, just like to argue. I have not ignored you because on occasion you have something interesting to say, you are not vulgar, and... and... you're a good speller.

I don't like to argue. I just don't like bullshit to pass. The simple truth is you set up a new 9/11 thread after one had already been done to death so that you could repeat your points from the former whilst also being able to delete those posts that showed you to be wrong. You did this with abandon.

I do not recall you "show"ing me wrong on the 911 thread. I don't remember you posting any convincing evidence. Please post any proof you have to the appropriate discussion.

Thanks

Then you have a very poor memory. Your stark errors were pointed out by a good number of posters. It would be difficult to post the proof from your thread as you deleted it all, but people just need to go to the original 9/11 thread and see what people posted in response to you. You're one of those tin foil hat conspiracy believers (controlled demolitions FFS) who no matter what evidence they are shown continue to hold on desperately to their beliefs. As your arguments became more laughable and repetitive I recall you changed your name to The Professor, presumably in an effort to try and instill your arguments with a sense of gravitas. It didn't work.

My posts led you to The professor moniker? How exactly do you figure that?

You're just a 9/11 conspiracy quack who has now posted that ridiculous image how many times exactly? And which thread is the appropriate one? The one where you can delete any responses that refute your views or the one where the arguments have already been done to death? I imagine you are probably just looking for yet another opportunity to post exactly the same images and videos from your go to crackpot conspiracy websites that you have already done multiple times. Count me out from your mind numbing stupidity.

The one where you can delete any responses that refute your views or the one where the arguments have already been done to death?

I could delete your comments here.

Go ahead see if you can refute my views and see if I delete them. I just keep posting that image because it disproves your "theory" and you cannot refute it.

You make my point for me. Why should I give even more oxygen to your conspiracy theories? Pretty much everything has already been covered in the original 9/11 thread and yet here you are trying to kickstart it once again in a completely unrelated thread. Why not just go back and reread that thread, or do you, perhaps, simply want to have a rerun of the thing that seems to get your juices flowing the most? You'll have to forgive me for not wanting another run through of your conspiracy website go to videos. Enough brain cells died watching the videos/reading your posts last time.
And no, that image doesn't disprove the facts (or my theory as you put it). That image, where it came from, and how ridiculous it is has already been explained to you multiple times. If you choose to ignore that because it doesn't confirm your bias, then that is your prerogative.

Number one on the list is Apocalypse. Some people just can't handle his kind of wisdom.

Once again CapShudup makes the top ten. He really gets a reaction.

How did Dan make the top 10?

All 3 of the people I ignore are in the top twenty. This unnamed trio is obnoxious, combative, and annoying. They hurl personal attacks and will never admit to being wrong.

Also never wrong, in the top twenty most ignored, and noteworthy for their anoyingness is Bigsby at number 7, Roberto at number 14, and Iwog at 19 (Barely made the top 20 Iwog). I would not ignore these three because they are often entertaining and occasionally educational. Just don't try to change their minds. They are so smart that your own ignorance may force you to ignore them.

Number one on the list is Apocalypse. Some people just can't handle his kind of wisdom.

Once again CapShudup makes the top ten. He really gets a reaction.

How did Dan make the top 10?

All 3 of the people I ignore are in the top twenty. This unnamed trio is obnoxious, combative, and annoying. They hurl personal attacks and will never admit to being wrong.

Also never wrong, in the top twenty most ignored, and noteworthy for their anoyingness is Bigsby at number 7, Roberto at number 14, and Iwog at 19 (Barely made the top 20 Iwog). I would not ignore these three because they are often entertaining and occasionally educational. Just don't try to change their minds. They are so smart that your own ignorance may force you to ignore them.

So what? 11 of those came as a consequence of my flame war with DarrellinPhoenix (and his numerous aliases) over the space of a couple of days. Before he appeared on the scene, I hadn't been put on ignore by anyone. Number 12 is Underwaterman, which needs no explanation.

And I'm perfectly happy to change my mind. I do so frequently, but posting daft images and videos from conspiracy websites is not generally the way to change someone's mind if they have any kind of critical thinking skills. You claim to be a professor, so you should understand that, or are you now admitting you were telling a porkie pie in that regard?

I'm still a professor Bigsby. I have been teaching computer science, applications, and programming at the college level for almost 25 years now.

I know I never convinced you against the official conspiracy story around 9/11. We'll have to let history decide. Remember for many decades the official story was that the Spaniards blew up the Maine which launched our colonial excursions into Cuba and the Phillipines.

And I'm perfectly happy to change my mind. I do so frequently, but posting daft images and videos from conspiracy websites is not generally the way to change someone's mind if they have any kind of critical thinking skills.

Here is another "daft image" from a conspiracy website. Do you recognize this one? It shows how a building can destroy itself.

And I'm perfectly happy to change my mind. I do so frequently, but posting daft images and videos from conspiracy websites is not generally the way to change someone's mind if they have any kind of critical thinking skills.

Here is another "daft image" from a conspiracy website. Do you recognize this one? It shows how a building can destroy itself.

Yes, I recognize it as you are again posting the same stuff that has already been posted a number of times before. And as before, you seem to have totally failed to take note of the rather glaring differences between the Bazant image and your 9/11 conspiracy theory one, 'professor.'
And your moving on from all this doesn't seem to have lasted very long, has it?

In numerology, the expression number "7" means:
"You are gifted with an analytical mind and an enormous appetite for the answers to life's hidden questions. "

That's from one numerology site. However, another one owned by someone who can't spell worth a shit says it's more about the spiritual and threw out a bunch of words like "chakra" in an attempt to impress me... then they wished me a "Woderful day." (hey - at least they spelled "day" correctly). But these two numerologists disagree with each other, and I'm thinking someone got to one of them in order to have me thrown off the scent.

Please note that I would provide links to these sites, but I truly don't give a shit and will now pour myself a glass of wine. Is it a conspiracy that I've been driven to drink at 1:30p? Hmmm...

"You are gifted with an analytical mind and an enormous appetite for the answers to life's hidden questions. "

I am certain that the video sticking is a conspiracy. The oligarchical technocracy (Or is it technocratic oligarchy? I get confused) does not want you to see the evidence of the truth. Instead they just want you to take your SOMA (Wine in your case) and watch reality TV.

But seriously, if the government did not have evil factions there would not be conspiracy theories.

I want to go back to sleep now, forget my history, and live in a world where America is good and strong, the bastion of democracy fighting for a free world where the terrorist (boogie man) cannot hurt us.

Instead they just want you to take your SOMA (Wine in your case) and watch reality TV.

For you in the Generations that have not read Huxleys "Brave New World" SOMA is The imaginary "ideal pleasure drug" in Aldous Huxley's 1932 Novel. Its chemistry and pharmacology are undefined. As described, the drug resembles a hangoverless tranquilliser or an opiate.

All of the sudden this thread became about whether or not you are a liar

Really? When did that happen?

Truth be told, I am only a college instructor. I do not have a Phd. Having said that, my students call me professor, Bigsby calls me professor, all of Patnet knows me as "The Professor", and I profess to know a lot about computers and history.

All of the sudden this thread became about whether or not you are a liar

Really? When did that happen?

I didn't say that you are a liar - and my use of the word "liar" was incorrect. Actually, Bigsby used the words "biased" and "wrong." I have no opinion on those either, and I stopped reading that conversation. Hell, he might even have called you a poopy head for all that I know (again, I gots no opinion).

The thing about conspiracy theories is that most of the time they're hard to prove, and even harder to disprove. IMHO, as long as they cast some doubt on the subject, they can't be proven or disproven. I've read some of the 9/11 theories and while I don't believe them, I don't disbelieve them either. I don't know what to believe but I don't spend a lot of time on it either.

Truth be told, I have no problem with you or whether or not you are an actual "Professor." Silly me, though - I just looked up the description of "professor" and you meet it.

I've read some of the 9/11 theories and while I don't believe them, I don't disbelieve them either. I don't know what to believe but I don't spend a lot of time on it either.

Their have been conspiracies ever since 2 men plotted to take a lone hunters kill...

I don't spend much time on conspiracies either. I just found out about the 3rd WTC tower collapsing last year here on Patnet and never would have found out about it had I not been researching the housing market.

When you get down to it it is all a conspiracy. Shadow inventory, TARP, HAARP, AARP, silver manipulation, second amendment elimination, Ron Paul, Obama, Bush, the Clintons,... where do the conspiracies end?