Attention!!! Pro Sports Daily will be down on Wednesday morning from 5:00am - 7:00am eastern time for database maintenance. All Sports Direct Inc. properties will be down during this scheduled outage.
Sorry for any inconvenience that this outage may cause.

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

matt moore had two of the highest QBR posted last year in individual games................

... and posted two of the Highest QB ratings posted for all of last year (147.5; 133.3; and 122.3) in individual games.

Does that now call into question the accuracy of QB Rating for you? NO? Then why does it call into question the accuracy of QBR?

I also find it funny that you've spent about 30 posts preaching about sample size yet are willing to broad-stroke criticize QBR based on 2 games. I guess you only heed your own advice when it goes against Eli

... and posted two of the Highest QB ratings posted for all of last year (147.5; 133.3; and 122.3) in individual games.

Does that now call into question the accuracy of QB Rating for you? NO? Then why does it call into question the accuracy of QBR?

I also find it funny that you've spent about 30 posts preaching about sample size yet are willing to broad-stroke criticize QBR based on 2 games. I guess you only heed your own advice when it goes against Eli

And as for the Matt Ryan stuff, do you consider Matt Ryan average?

im not calling it in to question. it is more contigent on team success than regular qb rating. im not syaing its wrong, i just personally dont like it.

Team stats are the best way to judge individual players? the logic keeps getting better and better.

Compared to your logic any logic whatsoever can be labelled better and better.

I mean, you keep acting like the team has no bearing on individual stats. It's really quite comical to watch you contradict yourself considering every single Peyton vs Brady thread you make it a point to bring up how good Brady's numbers looked with elite talent like Peyton.

Yet when it comes to Eli suddenly it's individual stats are solely accumulated by that person and the team has no bearing on them whatsoever.

Compared to your logic any logic whatsoever can be labelled better and better.

I mean, you keep acting like the team has no bearing on individual stats. It's really quite comical to watch you contradict yourself considering every single Peyton vs Brady thread you make it a point to bring up how good Brady's numbers looked with elite talent like Peyton.

Yet when it comes to Eli suddenly it's individual stats are solely accumulated by that person and the team has no bearing on them whatsoever.

But no, question our logic

When did I say the team don't? And I don't know what your talking about the pm vs TB thread. Considering I'm not a patriots fan and side with Manning. Nice try though. And if team does affect individual stats, like they do, how does that help Eli's case. Considering he has one of the best wrs and another on the verge of being top 10. Way to help your arguemnt.

Team stats are the best way to judge individual players? the logic keeps getting better and better.

In many ways yes.

Lets just look at Eli vs. Romo.

Eli led his team to have a higher ranked passing offense (yards).

Eli also led his team to more offensive TDs on the season and more offensive points overall. The Giants had about 17 rushing TDs (or something like that). Only about 3 or 4 of them were set up by the rushing offense. Eli was basically responsible for setting up the rest. Meanwhile, the Cowboys only had 4 rushing TDs despite having a clearly better rushing offense. So, while Romo threw 2 more passing TDs...Eli led his team to almost 10 more total TDs on the season.

Eli had a lower completion percentage, but at the end of the day he had more yards and more yards per attempt. That tells me that he was better at moving the ball in between the 20s.

And if you look at their red zone play...Eli may have thrown 2 less TDs, but he led his team and set up his team for more total TDs and more total points. Advantage Eli.

The only thing Romo was better at than Eli was interceptions. Having said that, Eli did a tremendous job this season of taking calculated risks. Despite the face that Eli threw 6 more picks, he and Romo had about the same amount of truly detrimental Ints. When its 3rd and long at mid field...an Int has basically the same effect on your team's chances of winning as does an incomplete pass. If you go back and do the research, Eli only had about 4-5 Ints that were inexcusable and costly to the team. Off the top of my head, I can count about 3-4 ints that Romo had that were truly detrimental to his team's chances of winning a given game.

Still though...ok I'll give Romo the win in the TO department. But, this past year there was no question that Eli lead his offense to be more successful than did Romo in the grand scheme of things, despite the fact that he had less balance in his offense.

Team stats told this story. The individual stats in this particular case...hid a good portion of the truth.

Now, if you simply watch the games you can see this with your own two eyes, but team stats cannot be ignored. They are just as, if not even more important than the individual stats when it pertains to evaluating the Qb position.

In the end, you have to look at ALL of these statistics in context to what happens in the game and throughout the season. You also have to look at the qualities these guys possess off the field and in certain big stage moments.

Eli was better than Romo last season, despite have a lower Qb rating by about 7 points or so. Eli was a better and more valuable asset to his team this past season.

Last edited by Wrigheyes4MVP; 03-09-2012 at 03:41 PM.

DUDA

Originally Posted by VendettaRed07

noah is gonna be a beast man.

with him and harvey, its like were gonna have Goku and Vegetta in the same rotation

Eli also led his team to more offensive TDs on the season and more offensive points overall. The Giants had about 17 rushing TDs (or something like that). Only about 3 or 4 of them were set up by the rushing offense. Eli was basically responsible for setting up the rest. Meanwhile, the Cowboys only had 4 rushing TDs despite having a clearly better rushing offense. So, while Romo threw 2 more passing TDs...Eli led his team to almost 10 more total TDs on the season.

Eli had a lower completion percentage, but at the end of the day he had more yards and more yards per attempt. That tells me that he was better at moving the ball in between the 20s.

And if you look at their red zone play...Eli may have thrown 2 less TDs, but he led his team and set up his team for more total TDs and more total points. Advantage Eli.

The only thing Romo was better at than Eli was interceptions. Having said that, Eli did a tremendous job this season of taking calculated risks. Despite the face that Eli threw 6 more picks, he and Romo had about the same amount of truly detrimental Ints. When its 3rd and long at mid field...an Int has basically the same effect on your team's chances of winning as does an incomplete pass. If you go back and do the research, Eli only had about 4-5 Ints that were inexcusable and costly to the team. Off the top of my head, I can count about 3-4 ints that Romo had that were truly detrimental to his team's chances of winning a given game.

Still though...ok I'll give Romo the win in the TO department. But, this past year there was no question that Eli lead his offense to be more successful than did Romo in the grand scheme of things, despite the fact that he had less balance in his offense.

Team stats told this story. The individual stats in this particular case...hid a good portion of the truth.

Now, if you simply watch the games you can see this with your own two eyes, but team stats cannot be ignored. They are just as, if not even more important than the individual stats when it pertains to evaluating the Qb position.

In the end, you have to look at ALL of these statistics in context to what happens in the game and throughout the season. You also have to look at the qualities these guys possess off the field and in certain big stage moments.

Eli was better than Romo last season, despite have a lower Qb rating by about 7 points or so. He was a better and more valuable asset to his team this past season.

Eli also led his team to more offensive TDs on the season and more offensive points overall. The Giants had about 17 rushing TDs (or something like that). Only about 3 or 4 of them were set up by the rushing offense. Eli was basically responsible for setting up the rest. Meanwhile, the Cowboys only had 4 rushing TDs despite having a clearly better rushing offense. So, while Romo threw 2 more passing TDs...Eli led his team to almost 10 more total TDs on the season.

Eli had a lower completion percentage, but at the end of the day he had more yards and more yards per attempt. That tells me that he was better at moving the ball in between the 20s.

And if you look at their red zone play...Eli may have thrown 2 less TDs, but he led his team and set up his team for more total TDs and more total points. Advantage Eli.

The only thing Romo was better at than Eli was interceptions. Having said that, Eli did a tremendous job this season of taking calculated risks. Despite the face that Eli threw 6 more picks, he and Romo had about the same amount of truly detrimental Ints. When its 3rd and long at mid field...an Int has basically the same effect on your team's chances of winning as does an incomplete pass. If you go back and do the research, Eli only had about 4-5 Ints that were inexcusable and costly to the team. Off the top of my head, I can count about 3-4 ints that Romo had that were truly detrimental to his team's chances of winning a given game.

Still though...ok I'll give Romo the win in the TO department. But, this past year there was no question that Eli lead his offense to be more successful than did Romo in the grand scheme of things, despite the fact that he had less balance in his offense.

Team stats told this story. The individual stats in this particular case...hid a good portion of the truth.

Now, if you simply watch the games you can see this with your own two eyes, but team stats cannot be ignored. They are just as, if not even more important than the individual stats when it pertains to evaluating the Qb position.

In the end, you have to look at ALL of these statistics in context to what happens in the game and throughout the season. You also have to look at the qualities these guys possess off the field and in certain big stage moments.

Eli was better than Romo last season, despite have a lower Qb rating by about 7 points or so. Eli was a better and more valuable asset to his team this past season.

Or how about this. The giants.longest rush att was 37 yds. That's tells me most of their rush tds were in the redzone. So maybe they don't trust Eli in the red zone
Prolly afraid his interceptionitis will show up again.

In fact all 17 came in the red zone. 15 pass in the red zone. With Manning's 50% comp and 75.9 rate in the red zone, I could see why they would run in the red zone.

Or how about this. The giants.longest rush att was 37 yds. That's tells me most of their rush tds were in the redzone. So maybe they don't trust Eli in the red zone
Prolly afraid his interceptionitis will show up again.

In fact all 17 came in the red zone. 15 pass in the red zone. With Manning's 50% comp and 75.9 rate in the red zone, I could see why they would run in the red zone.

More bologna

DUDA

Originally Posted by VendettaRed07

noah is gonna be a beast man.

with him and harvey, its like were gonna have Goku and Vegetta in the same rotation