Review of
Strategic Conflicts

An article on Infowars[1]
brings to mind a number of considerations, but arguably
condenses in large part to one question - are we seeing
a bona-fide prelude to World War Three, or is this just
another round of bluff and tuff brinkmanship to
re-affirm who is actually running the world? This
area of discussion has been touched upon before, but
deserves review. Behind this simpler question is
the real quandary - will Putin and his BRIC cohorts
actually break away from the Rothschild dynasty, under a
genuine willingness, if necessary, to use nuclear war,
or is the current military show another round of
expensive origami that will again resolve into the
controlling hand of war - money?

Completely sidestepping considerations
about our society's ability to withstand a nuclear war,
the issue at hand is the likelihood, all other matters
notwithstanding, that we might end up in one.
There is much to suggest that we are about to experience
the complementary analogue to the Cuban Missile Crisis
in Ukraine and elsewhere, but there exist differences
between ethos and technical volatility of today versus
1963. Khrushchev is quoted as saying[2]
that he first heard about development of thermonuclear
explosives when he assumed office and at first he could
not sleep - until he suddenly realized that these
weapons could never be used. No doubt, Kennedy was
not attracted to the idea of such a war.
Technically speaking, Khrushchev is not entirely correct
from two standpoints - first, such a view does not in
all cases preclude an accidental conflagration and full
escalation, and second, in the event that an enemy is
sufficiently sabotaged, a modest number of detonations
could be used for a strategic victory, especially when a
surprisingly small number of deployments can effectively
devastate a nation without producing an overwhelming
amount of physical destruction. Also relevant is
the fact that the number of detonations performed for
atomic testing already number in the thousands[3],
with the implication that a pragmatic post-war strategic
picture could withstand this number from a radiological
perspective. Some theses suggest that certain
prominent families have been of the mindset that a
nuclear war would be desirable[4], but these
families have had underground facilities for many
decades now, and there are a few questions about their
attitude toward mankind. It is arguable that this
attitude had attained dominance in the same stratum of
society under a more generalized concept of eugenics and
population control, expressing itself in such places (I
have mentioned in other discussions) as the Cobden Club
recommendations to the UN in 1991[5].
Such recommendations are not, of course, couched in
their candid terms but are always stated in the cadence
of lofty ideals. So too, did Hitler, and the
current presidential directives laying in wait used the
same carbon paper. These ideals, when
decomposed into their ethical and psychological
components, are the socio-pathology of brilliant minds
operating in existential logic, but immaculately
sterilized of any concept of higher order consciousness
variously referred to as "spiritual," or in any way
inspired from a higher source than themselves. We
see this philosophy in spades in the recent discussion
about the new Illuminati web site [6].
An exception, a hybrid, is the realm of complex
intermediates such as Scientology and Urantinism, that
do appeal to "higher" orders of thought and reality, but
stop short, either in the technical frontier of the
extraterrestrial advancements or in the false ceiling of
half-baked esoterics, of the unlimited world of full
spiritual receptiveness. That the state of
enlightenment and its class of ethos at these higher
realms does not map uniquely and deductively from the
physical experience of our earthly senses is
mathematically evident at elementary levels, and forms
the cornerstone of the argument that this neuvo-Greco
romance with technology will be short-lived, but of
course also possibly catastrophic, as it falls from its
throne.

A curious but relevantly illustrative
physical analogue is the development of the Sloika
(Russian Layer Cake) thermonuclear bomb, an ingenious
design by Andrei Sakharov employing lithium deuteride
layers between fissile shells, producing a deliverable
thermonuclear explosive several dozen times larger than
the existing Los Alamos and German designs used on
Nagasaki and Hiroshima, respectively. It is also
interesting to note that Russia achieved this higher
yield weapon before the United States, that was
struggling over Teller's liquid deuterium Mike shots,
far too heavy and technically impractical to
deliver. Filtered X-ray radiation implosion and
the concept of an unlimited thermonuclear detonation
wave came a little later, offering any yield size would
permit, using lithium and deuterium. The curious
analogue is the state we are in at the moment, in which
there are excursions into the esoteric physical and
socio-spiritual phenomena, but for sure, the "unlimited"
condition has not been achieved. This leaves us in
the most dangerous position of "partial knowledge," the
most dangerous class of weapon.

An even more ominous situation exists
in the leadership of our country, not only in its
incongruent priorities that routinely tear through the
Pentagon, but by the normalization of corruption, the
new "corporate culture"[7] of every agency in
our government. This "culture" does not originate
with the Obama administration, but is the outgrowth of a
long term emasculation off the United States that spans
far beyond military matters to include a broad
conditioning of America's population for retirement from
dominance in world military and economic power, and from
their role as dominant consumers. The baby boomer
demographics only worsen the sociological equation, with
the immigration dilemma being nothing but backfill to
compensate for loss in collateral birthrate to support
monetary growth and the debt structure that feeds upon
it[8]. In their own turn, all notable
events of the last two-plus decades, whether 911, Sandy
Hook, Ferguson and its terrible sequelum, are controlled
cultural demolition of the U.S., as socio-psychological
manipulations to implement a massive realignment of
world industrial power and the role of the general
population relative to the controlling families.
Most relevant to this discussion is the willingness of
the perpetrators, themselves historical prodigies
of the most dreadful pedigrees of carnage, have not the
slightest qualm about killing several thousand in two
tall buildings, but carry the systemic philosophy that
genocide, most often with a chocolate coating, is not
only acceptable, but desirable. For
such reasons I am concerned that a limited thermonuclear
war is modestly likely. But far worse, there are
mechanisms to achieve the same result or greater through
more subtle avenues. Ebola, and its cousins, are
examples. The grid-failure scenario is complicated
by several opposing views. A conventional
"us-versus-them" situation would suggest an attack on
our grid using EMP, coordinated sabotage. or possibly
cyber, which both Russia and China are particularly
capable of. The latter argument may not,
ironically due to its archaic structure, render our grid
as vulnerable as some may think, but the first two,
especially an attack on several hundred points of the
grid using conventional methods, offers the prospect of
the most efficient genocidal operation in history.
That the American people are highly cultivated sitting
ducks for this is no accident. That they are
sitting ducks for a good many things is no
accident.

Manipulation of oil prices appears to
be a significant indicator of polarization of major
world players, with Russia on the receiving end of an
effort to limit its ability to finance projection of
power[10]. The Saudi family, a long
standing member of Western geopolitical power, has
drastically lowered oil prices, forcing other nations
with higher cost bases of oil production to become
unprofitable, notably including Russia.
Interestingly, this also includes North American shale
oil, and it is arguable that the executive branch
foot-dragging with the Keystone pipeline project could
be a reflection of a strategic plan to drop oil prices
in order to limit Russia's influence, during which time
period the Keystone project would not be
profitable. Such a theory would also
indicate that oil prices will stay low for a significant
time-frame. This is also consistent with the
prevailing consensus among financial analysts that we
are entering a substantial deflationary period, but the
new term in this equation would then be that this
deflationary turn is being driven by a strategic
depression of oil prices in order to prostrate Russian
military expansion. If this is indeed the
case, then the pressure for military conflict increases,
both from the urgency of the Russian need to resolve the
fiscal imbalance, and also from the perspective that the
power struggle between Russia and the West is quite
real, and not simply an anecdote riding on a controlling
horse. Putin must, of course, patronize Western
banks and their world order to receive payment, but if
the basis for such payment reaches a defacto end, then
the potential for military resolution increases
dramatically. Such a conflict does not
necessarily have to resolve into general world war, as
the potential to sabotage oil flow using clandestine
operations to disrupt oil commerce will logically become
high - by far the cheapest solution for Russia.
Any operation that destabilizes the Middle East will
achieve this effect, including serious provocation of
Israel. It is best to again consider the
initial conflict in Syria[12],[13],[14],[15],
and the gas pipeline issue, that was a proxy conflict
between Russian gas interests and Western control in the
area. In the background remains the greater
strategic plan for North Africa and Lower Asia that has
been on the Langley drawing boards for decades -
the destabilization of these areas, leading to the
ultimate conquering of the ancient Persian Empire and
Babylon. Secret occult rationales and economic
pressures have favored this operation by the West, and
it is well to consider that the primary target of
acquisition during the first Iraq war was an
archaeological site. The capture of Saddam
Hussein, the ostensive icon of pretext, was left
untouched, to become another pretext, two-in-one, for a
second invasion after the 911 operation, also on CIA
drawing boards as early as the seventies[11].
The chief question now is whether the long established
power struggle, in particular the containment of Russia
by the Inner City of London, will remain in a perpetual
state of arrested brinkmanship, or whether we are
entering a qualitatively new state of world power,
becoming inherently unstable. It is arguable that
the shift from America's industrial dominance to cheaper
lab our in the Far East did not occur as a natural
happenstance, and that the world's financial elite have
a plan to preserve their positions. Despite the
Rothschild doctrine of periodically destroying nations
and peoples, and then profiting from them, the risk of a
global thermonuclear conflict is not a logical
option. But we do have the eugenics philosophies
so evident at many levels as well as written literally
in stone. The overtly destructive programs
of genocide must then be replaced with more precise
ones, either biological weapons, mortality from
destruction of critical infrastructure, or with advanced
weapons such as directed energy. There is
little evidence to suggest that the world view from the
top includes the enlightenment and welfare of the
population at large, but rather very much the
converse. Putin's position in all of this,
while having the superficial patina of a rogue champion,
is scarcely a Saviour, as he is a fully vetted don of a
most treacherous family of organized crime. What
we appear to have at the moment is a contest between the
traditional world class crime families, but now without
all of the technical and philosophical constraints of
previous decades. The relative potential for
nuclear war can be argued both directions, but the
potential for unconventional war on humanity, in many
ways already well underway, would appear to approach the
realm of inevitable. The point of greatest
leverage between risk and effect appears to be the
disruption of oil supplies to the West.

The mechanics of global power
brokerage is arguably opaque, leaving us with some
uncertainties over the degree to which instabilities
from global polarization may exceed the intended order
of its masters. Indeed, historically, the Cold
War, as discussed elsewhere, was a carefully balanced
control of technological power by the Nazis and their
cohorts in the U.S., dispensing advancements to keep
both the Soviets and U.S. from monopolizing power.
If such a stabilizing factor has been vestigilaised or
is absent, then we are faced with the question of
whether the Rothschild group has enough leverage,
infiltration and secret collateral in Russian and
Chinese interests to persuade Putin&Co to play along
with the prima facie NWO game. It is unsettling to
consider that such a situation should not be expected to
garner such huge Russian and Chinese military
investments, which are rather obviously coordinated now,
an historic anomaly. It is notable that the
Germans sent the Auschwitz uranium to the U.S. to keep
their arch enemy, the Russians, from holding too much
post-war power, and that the cooperation between Russia
and China has a similar flavor. It is arguable
that there is no singular overwhelming center of control
over the developing economic and war theatres, and that
a departure from historical norms may occur.
In addition, we are aware of the predilection of the
ruling families for genocide, and that they certainly
have not been opposed to massively destructive wars in
the past. Arguments suggesting that they would not
want to damage physical collateral are moderated by this
situation. The financial simile is well understood
under the Rothschild principle of war and profit, and JP
Morgan's deliberately crashing markets and sweeping up
control of vulnerable parties, as we saw in 1907, and
also more recently in the MF Global, the Comex, and
elsewhere yet to be seen. Emblematic and endemic
to this arena is the most excrable, unsavory and
functionally superficial commander in chief in our
nation's history, coupled with a pathetic and so
ironically fawning public comprehension, and an
attendant and flagrant emasculation of original nation
and principle and the mechanisms to defend
them. The final appraisal of these
considerations will reside in improved information on
the status of control over the world power shift now
well underway, but such seems devoid of the restraint
that may have saved the world in 1963. One
remaining avenue awaits - extraterrestrial involvement
in avoiding world war in the Mid-East in the early
seventies, and its implications now. With such
considerations are questions about a more novel hand in
the future of mankind's affairs, and also the existence
of weaponry well beyond the power of nuclear
explosives. With this we must also consider the
role of a "false ET" event specifically predicted by the
late Werner Von Braun. Apart from the nebulous
picture these additions create, there remains the common
denominator of gross manipulation of the public mind,
and its departure from genuinely enlightened avenues
that inspire virtue and sovereignty in every individual
as the general sociological solution, rather than
submission to necessity, centralized power, and the
offering of yet another Volkswagen.

[4] I cannot recall the source a the moment, but a
discussion about the Rockefellers' close ties with Fidel
Castro and other players in the shade included the
distinct statement regarding their sentiments toward the
usefulness of such a war.

[5] See Val Valerian, "Matrix III," copy of
letter of recommendations by Cobden Club meeting to UN
Security Council, 1991.

[6] SK O'Neal on RuralSurvival,com, Illuminatius, 29 Nov
2014

[7] The term "new corporate culture" has been
visibly resident in the DOD since the nineties, and
places defence work more fully in the hands of
corporations, and very little at the more secure level
of vetted federal custodians.

[8] See the work of Michael Maloney, "The Death of
Money."

[9] I refer again to the excellent work of Carter
Hydrick, "Critical Mass," discussing the real German
atomic bomb programme and the brokerage of world power
from its appointments in the southern hemisphere, and
secret continuities within the U.S. government.