Roman Zadorov: Judges are the crux of the corruption! Join Tomorrow's demonstration!

Come tomorrow, May 19, 7:00pm, to Tel-Aviv Rabin Square! Join Ilana – murder victim Tair's mother, and Olga – purported “murderer” Roman Zadorov's wife! Together we must demand an end to the abomination! Roman Zadorov must be immediately freed![1]

Request for rendering a decision was filed in the Supreme Court in Zadorov v State of Israel. The request pertains to rendering a decision on the right to inspect the paper decision record (original records) from the Nazareth District Court, which is now held in the Supreme Court. The Regulations say: “Every person is permitted to inspect decisions and judgment, which are not prohibited for publication by law”. And the Supreme Court itself declared that the right of the public to inspect court records is “a fundamental principle in any democratic regime”, “constitutional, supra-statutory”... But the courts are delaying and preventing the exercise of the right to inspect such records in the Zadorov court file for over a aa year now.What are the judges hiding in the Zadorov court file? It is not difficult to guess... The right to inspect was partially exercised in the electronic court file in Net-HaMishpat (IT system of the court) in the Nazareth District Court – and it turned out that the 2010 judgment records (“Verdict” and “Sentencing”) by Judges Yitzhak Cohen, Esther Hellman, and Haim Galpaz are not duly signed - “draft” only... The right to inspect was also exercised in the Supreme Court's appeal court file, and there too, no signed judgments of the Nazareth were discovered, in disregard of the law, which prescribes the filing of signed and certified judgments for the opening of an appeal file... Zadorov's counsel in the appeal, Attorney Avigdor Feldman, explained the situation after the publication of these facts: He too failed in his efforts to discover the judgment records, since they were lost in the howling winds of the Jezreel Valley...

There is no need to recount the crooked conduct of the murder victim's school “friends”... There is no need to recount the crooked conduct of law and justice officers – from the Israel Police investigators, through District Attorney Mirit Stern, to State Prosecutor Shay Nitzan and Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein...

There is no need to detail again the exemplary and courageous conduct of forensic experts Dr Maya Forman and Dr Hen Kugel, Minister of Health Yael German, and the Israeli Medical Association...

As long as the authorities refuse to investigate and establish to whom belongs the abundant physical, scientific evidence – fingerprints, hairs, and DNA samples, which were found in the crime scene (none of which matches Zadorov), one cannot consider them as acting honestly. Suffice is to recall “conviction with no real evidence” (Prof Sangero), and “the justice system is primarily protecting itself” (Prof Kremnitzer)...

Attention must be focused on the criminal conduct of the judges – crux of the corruption in this affair. Already in the Varda AlShech scandal, the judges clarified that the publication of false and misleading “drafts” of judicial records, with intent to harm, is not considered by them criminality. But any reasonable person would consider such conduct organized crime on the bench.

Conditions, where an innocent person is confined for life imprisonment with no valid, enforceable judgment records is incredible!

Figure 1: Thursday, May 19, demonstration in Tel-Aviv in support of Roman Zadorov, who is falsely imprisoned for the murder of Tair Rada z"l. Amongthe speakers will be both Ilana, mother of the murder victim Tair, and Olga, Roman Zadorov's wife. Together we will call: End the abomination! Free Roman Zadorov now!

Figure 2: Judges are the core of the corruption in the Zadorov affair! The judges of the Nazareth District Court - Yitzhak Cohen, Esther Hellman and Haim Glapaz - conducted a sham/simulated trial, and never signed the verdict and sentencing records in 2010. And the Supreme Court jusices - Yoram Danziger, Yittzhak Amit and Tzi Zylbertal - conducted a sham appeal with no judgment records from the Nazareth District Court. Holding a person in life imprisonment with no judgments in incredible!

a. May 9, 2016 Request, which was filed in the Supreme Court, for Rendering a decision on the proforma request to inspect the decision records in the paper court file State of Israel v Zadorov (502-07) from the Nazareth District Court, which is now held by the Supreme Court.

קישור ישיר לבקשה למתן החלטה שהוגשה בבית המשפט העליון:

Direct link to the bilingual Request for Rendering Decision, which was filed in the Supreme Court:

Figure 3:Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) in the Supreme Court - April 21, 2016 Magistrate decision on proforma request to inspect decision records, which have been previously published, from the paper court file State of Israel v Zadorov (502-07) in the Nazareth District Court. The paper court file from Nazareth is today held by the Supreme Court, which is delaying the inspection in the paper court records with no reasonable explanation. The Magistrate's decision says: "Counsel for the Appellant gave notice that they leave the decision to the Court's discretion, and Counsel for the Respondent [State Prosecution - jz] gave notice that they have no objection to the requested inspection. With it, for caution's sake... the Respondent is requested to clarify whether there are any decisions in the paper court file, where inspection should be limited or denied (particularly for any prohibition by law)..." The Supreme Court is inviting objection to the inspection of decisionn records, which have already been published... But the invitation for the objection is addressed to one side only - the State Prosecution. Conduct of the Supreme Court in this matter begs for an explanation...

והשאלה המתבקשת היא: מה מנסים השופטים להסתיר? לא קשה לנחש...

c. Inspection of the electronic decision records in Net-HaMishpat (IT system of the court) in the Nazareth District Court was partially excercised, and documented serious fraud by the district judges - falsification of judgment records!

Figure 4: Judges of the Nazareth District Court - Yitzhak Cohen, Esther Hellman, and Haim Galpas - perpetrated serious fraud from the bench by conducting a sham/simulated trial, and never duly signed the 2010 judgments - verdict and sentencing records.

Figure 5: State of Israel v Roman Zadorov (502-07) in the Nazareth District Court - sham/fake/simulated trial. The signature boxes on the judgment records, which were discovered during inspection of the electronic court file in Net-HaMishpat - IT system of the court - in January 2016: a. The September 14, 2010 "Verdict"; b. The September 14, 2010 "Sentencing"; c. The February 24, 2014 "Supplemental Judgement. The 2010 records are missing any form of signature by one of the three judges of the panel - Judge Haim Galpaz. For the other two judges of the panel - Yitzhak Cohen and Esther Hellman - only "graphic signatures", which are negative images are seen. Such signatures have never been discovered to this date on any of the numerous decisions and judgments in Net-HaMishpat, which have been inspected.

In view of its conduct in the Zadorov case, the Nazareth District Court at best should be deemed an incompetent court.

Figure 6:The “Judgment Docket” in Net-HaMishpat in the Roman Zadorov court file in Nazareth fails to show entry of the 2010 unsigned “Verdict” and “Sentencing” records. With it, the 5 year long appeal in the Supreme Court purpotedly originated in such judgment records... The 2014 "Supplemental Judgment" was docketed as "Instruction to file Certificate of Counsel for Defendants"...

At the same time, Presiding Judge Avraham Avraham of the Nazareth District Court,Chief Clerk Oshrat Avichezer, and the Administration of Courts refuse to answer: a. Who is lawfully charged with the duty and authority to enter judgment records under the “Judgment Docket” in Net-HaMishpat in the Nazareth District Court? b. Does the entry of a court record as a “Judgment”, “Verdict”, and/or “Sentencing” under the “Judgment Docket” in Net-HaMishpat indicate that it is indeed a lawfully made, valid and effectual judgment in the respective court file? c. Does the failure to register a court records as a “Judgment”, “Verdict”, and/or “Sentencing” under the “Judgment Docket” in Net-HaMishpat indicate that it is indeed not a lawfully made, valid and effectual judgment in the respective court file?

Needless to say, the matter is addressed in great detail in the British Mandate period Regulations of the Court – Registration Office(1936), but Israeli Regulations of the Courts – Office of the Clerk (2004) are entirely silent on this matter.

A court, where there is no valid and honest entry of judgments, and instead - vague and ambiguous judgment records are maintained, would no doubt be deemed incompetent and/or corrupt court!

Figure 7: Hairs (photograph from the evidence material), dozens of fingerprints (schematic figure), and DNA samples (schematic figure), which match neither the victim Tair, nor Roman Zadorov, were discovered in the crime scene. As long as the authorities continue to refuse to investigate and determine to whom these samples belong, one cannot see them as acting honestly.

g. Inspection of the appeal court file in the Supreme Court was excercised, and docuemnted serious failure - conduct for 5 years of a sham/fake/simulated appeal process, originated from no authentic judgment records of the Nazareth District Court.

Figure 9: Roman Zadorov v State of Israel (7939/10) in the Supreme Court - records that were discovered in inspection of the paper court file (original records) in the Supreme Court: a. September 14, 2010 "Verdict" - an unsigned printout from an unknown source, which is patently not a valid court record. b. September 14, 2010 "Sentencing - a printout from "Nevo Publishing, LTD", which is patently not a court record. The Supreme Court purported to conduct for five (5) years an appeal in a murder case wiht no valid court judgments of the Nazareth District Court, in disregard of explicit provisions of the law. In view of its conduct in the Zadorov case, the Supreme Court should at best be deemed an incompetent court.

11-12-10 Where should Occupy go next? Civil Disobedience in the footsteps of Thoreau and Gandhi!http:// www.scribd.com/doc/75348301/12-06-08 Courts and Judges as racketeering enterprises under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) - key element in the current financial crisishttp://www.scribd.com/doc/96504009/Secede! The US in its current form is simply unmanageable...

What did the experts say?

* דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח התקופתי של האו"ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013), בלוויית ההערה: "חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Humnan Rights in Israel, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel."

The United States

* "...it's difficult to find a fraud of this size on the U.S. court system in U.S. history... where you have literally tens of thousands of fraudulent documents filed in tens of thousands of cases." Raymond Brescia, a visiting professor at Yale Law School

* Los Angeles County is"the epicenter of the epidemic of real estate and mortgage fraud."FBI (2004)

* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."Prof David Burcham, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)

* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted.”Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Irvine Law School (2000)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/239647129/The HRA submission was incorporated into the 2015 HRC Professional Staff Report on the United States with the note: :“HRA NGO recommended restoring the integrity of the IT systems of the courts, under accountability to the Congress, with the goal of making such systems as transparent as possible to the public at large.”

[2] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2013 UPR of the State of Israel was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Lack of integrity in the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees' courts in Israel".

2012-06-04 Human Right Alert's Submission; 2013 UPR of the State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the

[3] Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the 2010 UPR of the United States was incorporated into the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report with the note: "Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."

2010-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the

2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:

[1] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Records for 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, where Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission was incorporated with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/http://www.scribd.com/doc/108663259/