previously I worked on sorting an integer sequence with no identical numbers (without loss of generality, let's assume the sequence is a permutation of 1,2,...,n) into its natural increasing order (i.e. 1,2,...,n). I'm think of how to swap the elements (regardless of the positions of elements; in other words, a swap is valid for any two elements) with minimal number of swaps. I guess the following is a feasible algorithm:

Swap two elements with the constraint that either one or both of them should be swapped into the correct position(s). Until every element is put in its correct position.

But I don't know how to mathematically prove if the above algorithm can lead to the optimal solution. Anyone can help?

1 Answer
1

I was able to prove this with graph theory. Might want to add that tag in :)

Create a graph with n vertices. Create an edge from node n_i to n_j if the element in position i should be in position j in the correct ordering. You will now have a graph consisting of several non-intersecting cycles. I argue that the minimum number of swaps needed to order the graph correctly is

M = sum (c in cycles) size(c) - 1

Take a second to convince yourself of that...if two items are in a cycle, one swap can just take care of them. If three items are in a cycle, you can swap a pair to put one in the right spot, and a two-cycle remains, etc. If n items are in a cycle, you need n-1 swaps. (This is always true even if you don't swap with immediate neighbors.)

Given that, you may now be able to see why your algorithm is optimal. If you do a swap and at least one item is in the right position, then it will always reduce the value of M by 1. For any cycle of length n, consider swapping an element into the correct spot, occupied by its neighbor. You now have a correctly ordered element, and a cycle of length n-1.

Since M is the minimum number of swaps, and your algorithm always reduces M by 1 for each swap, it must be optimal.