tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post4914421764547168684..comments2018-08-10T11:38:26.479-06:00Comments on The Jeff Crank Show: Jeff Crank's Ballot RecommendationsJeff Crankhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02643797538496443365noreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-65468187532434714242017-10-16T10:55:51.424-06:002017-10-16T10:55:51.424-06:00Will you be making any recommendations for Novembe...Will you be making any recommendations for November, 2017 for local Colorado?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-12364365212036590772017-09-25T06:54:27.786-06:002017-09-25T06:54:27.786-06:00Here you can find great essay writer service if yo...Here you can find great <a href="https://pro-essay-writer.com/" rel="nofollow">essay writer service</a> if you are looking for oneDung Mauricehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04236634701560566792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-35465467488146459262017-06-10T04:32:01.782-06:002017-06-10T04:32:01.782-06:00Earning a good education is a lifelong investment....Earning a good education is a lifelong investment. This could mean wide range of career opportunities, and job options. However, not everyone has the privilege to continue studies at colleges and universities due to financial constraints. It is the foremost reason that impedes a person to pursue a good education. For this reason, grant for education has been established and has become available to provide assistance for underprivileged individuals in their pursuit of having equal opportunity in obtaining good education.<a href="http://www.how-todo.xyz/" rel="nofollow">http://www.how-todo.xyz/</a>Sowpath dashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00357933460302060158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-86948213781263014782016-11-08T15:24:30.555-07:002016-11-08T15:24:30.555-07:00Excellent write-up. Was not having any luck resea...Excellent write-up. Was not having any luck researching where the judges fall on the conservative/liberal spectrum until i found this article. Many thanks!Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14204290055483357534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-87454713024978604432016-11-07T10:38:47.660-07:002016-11-07T10:38:47.660-07:00Good for you. We&#39;ve had over 6,000 people loo...Good for you. We&#39;ve had over 6,000 people look at the list online in the last two weeks. So if we get 6,000 good votes to your one, it was time well spent.Jeff Crankhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06896175268538245638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-49476470529032208772016-11-07T10:02:56.899-07:002016-11-07T10:02:56.899-07:00Oh man this is incredibly helpful! All I have to d...Oh man this is incredibly helpful! All I have to do is vote the opposite of you and we&#39;re good to go :DAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-45462039564048187442016-11-04T09:37:25.572-06:002016-11-04T09:37:25.572-06:00Yes I can. Political parties are private organiza...Yes I can. Political parties are private organizations that people choose to affiliate with or not. Government has no business telling private entities who should vote in elections for their leadership. I compare it to members who choose to join the NRA - and then having the government step in and tell the NRA that they must allow people who chose not to join the NRA vote in their elections. It is wrong. If people want to choose a Republican or Democrat nominee, they should affiliate with that political party. If they don&#39;t, they have no business voting in their primary. I don&#39;t have any expectation to vote in a Libertarian party primary or a Green party primary because I have chosen to not affiliate with them. This is big government forcing private organizations to change their rules. People opposed to big government should oppose. Those are my reasons.Jeff Crankhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06896175268538245638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-54612816267254654352016-11-03T23:49:27.379-06:002016-11-03T23:49:27.379-06:00I was able to look it up. The judges in question ...I was able to look it up. The judges in question are Hawthorne and Terry. Here is a link to the case: https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_of_Appeals/Opinion/2016/15CA0990-PD.pdfWriterOfMindshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03848533877998707168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-22381103926104752042016-11-03T23:28:21.155-06:002016-11-03T23:28:21.155-06:00I was able to look it up. The judges in question ...I was able to look it up. The judges in question are Hawthorne and Terry. Here is a link to the case: https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_of_Appeals/Opinion/2016/15CA0990-PD.pdfWriterOfMindshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03848533877998707168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-84743471152101139362016-11-03T22:13:58.918-06:002016-11-03T22:13:58.918-06:00I agree with you on 108 and 107. I have my Dad and...I agree with you on 108 and 107. I have my Dad and Brother here with me and they were leaning towards yes on these propositions. Can you give more insight on why you went with no. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-61969159389076371062016-11-03T07:26:54.605-06:002016-11-03T07:26:54.605-06:00Amendment 71: Good goal, bad details. As written, ...Amendment 71: Good goal, bad details. As written, this amendment would &quot;ratchet in&quot; existing amendments that were passed with lesser requirements. Any change to amendment requirements should also state that existing amendments are to be removed with the same requirements that put them in to place. Also, if you really want representation from some minimum percent of the districts, this should be done at the vote stage, not the signature stage.Dave Johnsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-80772170926616784092016-11-02T14:17:59.973-06:002016-11-02T14:17:59.973-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.Joann Middendorfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03599496152489802470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-56828370340997775142016-11-01T15:05:56.108-06:002016-11-01T15:05:56.108-06:00Justice Hood, along with other Supreme Court justi...Justice Hood, along with other Supreme Court justices (minus Eid) denied the petition of Jack Phillips (owner of Masterpiece Cake). On the Appeals Court, Judge Taubman ruled and Judges Loeb and Berger concurred. I based my recommendations on reviewing cases, who they were appointed by, and discussions with conservative lawyers that I trust. Clear the Bench has some good information but they typically only review three cases - and I&#39;m not willing to make recommendations on three cases alone. I don&#39;t have the time to link all of my background research on judges. Rather, I put my information out there for people to see. If they trust me, they can use the information, if they don&#39;t that is alright too -and they can do their own research.Jeff Crankhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06896175268538245638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-30539295292549419202016-11-01T11:26:39.146-06:002016-11-01T11:26:39.146-06:00Jeff, I need some clarification. I thought I heard...Jeff, I need some clarification. I thought I heard on your radio program that Justice Hood had ruled in the Masterpiece Cake vs. Craig case (forcing a Christian baker to create a cake for a same-sex marriage). I cannot find that Justice Hood ruled in that case, but rather Appellate Court Judge Taubman ruled in that case. Please correct me if I heard wrong. I can&#39;t find your reasons for your judge retention votes and lacking that supporting info, I&#39;m having a problem with using your recommendations. One good website I used in 2014 also has info for judges in 2016: http://www.clearthebenchcolorado.org/evaluations-2016/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-15735938374727836732016-10-31T21:31:57.437-06:002016-10-31T21:31:57.437-06:00Evie&#39;s Mama, don&#39;t know who you&#39;re ref...Evie&#39;s Mama, don&#39;t know who you&#39;re referring to. If you gave more information, I&#39;d be happy to reconsider but it seems you&#39;d just rather act as though you know better. I did the best research I could on the judges. If you have thoughts bring them forward -or maybe you&#39;re just too conscientious for us less virtuous.Jeff Crankhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06896175268538245638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-63078321761832219482016-10-31T13:53:15.385-06:002016-10-31T13:53:15.385-06:00Curious why you would vote for Amendment U? While ...Curious why you would vote for Amendment U? While it would save *some* administrative costs, it also gives an unfair tax break to one group, which means the rest of the taxpayers will have to make up the difference. <br /><br />Regarding Amendment 71, I&#39;m voting YES. It would not require more signatures, but does require a better sampling from across the state vs. only the more liberal areas. There are other positives as well that far outweigh current opposition. Also see: http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20160305/OPINION01/160309756/0/SEARCH/Initiative-reform<br /><br />Several of your judicial recommendations are puzzling as well. Further research into individual performance reviews reveals weaknesses, such as bias in favor of prosecution, general understanding and application of law, overall demeanor with attorneys and non-attorneys, as well as sub-par reviews from attorneys, witnesses, jurors, etc. In my opinion, just because they were appointed by a Republican governor doesn&#39;t mean they&#39;re fit to serve on the court.<br /><br />Agree with everything else you recommended. Thanks for the guidelines; very helpful.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-54743648080258330182016-10-29T23:15:30.502-06:002016-10-29T23:15:30.502-06:00A vote for any third part candidate is a vote for ...A vote for any third part candidate is a vote for Clinton. One of these two, Trump or Clinton will be the next president whether we like it or not. In my opinion, based on most of the big issues, specifically the Supreme Court picks, Trump is the lesser of two undesirables.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-44367650091291847842016-10-29T23:12:05.339-06:002016-10-29T23:12:05.339-06:00This is definitely a hold-your-nose-and-vote elect...This is definitely a hold-your-nose-and-vote election. I&#39;m actually voting for Mike Pence!! Hillary is a &#39;go ahead, you have the right to kill your unborn baby&#39; believer. So...no. I would NEVER vote for her.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-90563313261956713892016-10-29T23:06:42.258-06:002016-10-29T23:06:42.258-06:00Hilarious may be better than utterly deceptive, un...Hilarious may be better than utterly deceptive, untruthful, dishonest, careless, liberal, pro-abortion, liberal Supreme Court choices, need I go on?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-53773615355383622452016-10-29T23:02:51.454-06:002016-10-29T23:02:51.454-06:00Then in essence, you are voting for Hillary Clinto...Then in essence, you are voting for Hillary Clinton. Very unfortunate.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-28120491127977113992016-10-27T22:38:37.805-06:002016-10-27T22:38:37.805-06:00Trump, hilarious. Utterly hilarious. The man is a ...Trump, hilarious. Utterly hilarious. The man is a woman hating pig. so....no.Stacie Pearmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00038259708873977194noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-49340461964240360082016-10-27T12:36:28.587-06:002016-10-27T12:36:28.587-06:00Who are the two judges you are referring to?Who are the two judges you are referring to?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-66063421380228501632016-10-26T22:18:51.777-06:002016-10-26T22:18:51.777-06:00So, just to be clear: you are voting YES on two ju...So, just to be clear: you are voting YES on two judges who voted to destroy frozen embryos of a divorcing couple when the mother was fighting to keep those embryos alive?? As a conscientious voter with true conservative (as opposed to blindly Republican) values, I cannot in good conscience keep reading these recommendations.Evie's Mamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06593089838266174081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-49241357455457073202016-10-26T17:28:10.331-06:002016-10-26T17:28:10.331-06:00Jeff nice chatting with you earlier this morning. ...Jeff nice chatting with you earlier this morning. Appreciate your recommendations. Please say hello to Joel for me.<br /><br />Don SpanoDonald Spanohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00780899641372429501noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3418870907025168328.post-61659737506525007682016-10-24T17:59:34.905-06:002016-10-24T17:59:34.905-06:00Thanks Jeff, Always listen in the AM, always nice...Thanks Jeff, Always listen in the AM, always nice to see you. I went the other way a la Kervorkian...not sure why....<br /><br />- Ragnar DanneskjöldAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com