Me too. Might be the fattest, heavier and hungriest but it's also the premium looking.

TA-pa-TA-pa-taPAtalk

09-21-2012

MonkeyClaw

Quote:

Originally Posted by MATRIX 2

Why would sony spend more money on an improvement when they can get away with using outdated tech.

It's all about the cost savings.

The cost difference between having wireless N on the new system would of been pennies, and would have made many people happy. I personally use Ethernet, but it would have definitely benefited a lot of people being that there are so many download/streaming options on the PS3 now compared to when the system launched!

09-21-2012

keefy

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonkeyClaw

The cost difference between having wireless N on the new system would of been pennies, and would have made many people happy. I personally use Ethernet, but it would have definitely benefited a lot of people being that there are so many download/streaming options on the PS3 now compared to when the system launched!

And using the PS3 as a media centre streaming movies form your computer to your PS3 If using wireless you get max 54Mbit and can have issues streaming high encoded 1080p video but using wired even at 100Mbit there are no such problems which is why I began to use wired.

09-21-2012

MATRIX 2

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonkeyClaw

The cost difference between having wireless N on the new system would of been pennies, and would have made many people happy. I personally use Ethernet, but it would have definitely benefited a lot of people being that there are so many download/streaming options on the PS3 now compared to when the system launched!

Pennies across millions of consoles add up. And people don't give a shit anyways (I've complained about it since launch), so why should sony bother. If they cared they should have put this in the pipeline as soon as MS put wifi (which is n) in the 360 slim.

Besides anybody that is serious about gaming uses a wired connection, unless you actually want latency.

Sony needs to save as much money as possible if they want a good start to the next generation.

09-21-2012

MonkeyClaw

Quote:

Originally Posted by MATRIX 2

Pennies across millions of consoles add up. And people don't give a shit anyways (I've complained about it since launch), so why should sony bother. If they cared they should have put this in the pipeline as soon as MS put wifi (which is n) in the 360 slim.

Besides anybody that is serious about gaming uses a wired connection, unless you actually want latency.

Sony needs to save as much money as possible if they want a good start to the next generation.

While it would add up to something over millions of consoles, that amount is still insignificant when you look at the bigger picture. Also, I agree with you 100%, if you have a wired connection available then definitely use it over wireless, but some people don't always have that option and using wireless is the only way to go for them. If they really wanted to cut cost they could have completely removed wireless from the system and sold it separately as a wireless module that plugs into the back of the console, or they could have removed the optical port and analog connection on the back and left it HDMI only as well. I am pretty sure the majority of televisions in people's homes now are HDTV's, does anyone seriously know someone who doesn't own at least one HDTV? If you don't, then you have bigger issues you need to be putting your money on than a PlayStation...

Alright. So the new PS3 uses the "thinner" 2.5" HDDs instead of the traditional 2.5" HDDs, interesting.

At least the old 2.5" HDDs are still compatible, which is good news for people looking to replace the HDD.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

09-24-2012

TGO

Quote:

Originally Posted by MATRIX 2

Based on the unboxing video, I say the new disc load system sucks. Long live slots.

And the price went up by $20.

That's the 500gb?
how much is the current 500gb slim compared to this 500gb super slim?

Sent via Codec

09-25-2012

MacP

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronSOLDIER

Can't believe you still don't get a HDMI cable with the PS3...

Just buy it from Ebay. Which did a comparison between the expensive cables and the cheap ones, and there was no conclusive winner.

This new slim wasn't as big of a bargain as I expected it to be. I thought they would of done 160GB version for like £180 or something accross those lines.

In fact I got my slim before this new one for £188 in Tesco which was 160GB.

09-25-2012

AaronSOLDIER

Quote:

Originally Posted by MacP

Just buy it from Ebay. Which did a comparison between the expensive cables and the cheap ones, and there was no conclusive winner.

Thats not the point, is it? It should be HD right out of the box and it isn't.

09-28-2012

Merchant

HDMI has become the new coaxial, I have too many of both laying around my place then I could ever use.

09-28-2012

Omar

They likely save a lot of money not including those cables.

09-28-2012

Marcsony

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kakihara_Anjo

HDMI has become the new coaxial, I have too many of both laying around my place then I could ever use.

This my friend is very true, got way to many now.

09-30-2012

TOM2x

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonkeyClaw

Just wondering why they would put an eject button or emblem along with no lip on that door if it was made to open manually...

Probably as a locking mechanism, so you can't accidently open it while the disc is spinning.

09-30-2012

mickice

Is it 3D HD out of the box? No. Is this a fail move? Yes.

09-30-2012

DarkVincent07

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickice

Is it 3D HD out of the box? No. Is this a fail move? Yes.

I agree. The WiiU comes with an hdmi out of the box which I noticed and thought was brilliant. I'm sure ps4 will follow... But my god why wouldn't you want people experiencing your content in HD :/

Via Tapatalk :)

09-30-2012

Soldier 95B

My guess is that there are still millions and millions that don't have HD tvs. They are catering to the entire population as opposed to a portion.

Sent from my PB99400 using Tapatalk 2

09-30-2012

Lethal

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soldier 95B

My guess is that there are still millions and millions that don't have HD tvs. They are catering to the entire population as opposed to a portion.

Sent from my PB99400 using Tapatalk 2

I know that does not stand in the US seeing how SD tv's have not been sold in stores in the last decade.

10-01-2012

Lefein

You know guys, you can connect a PS3 using the same component HD cable you hooked your PS2 up with if you really want to cry about it some more..

10-01-2012

snooper71

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lefein

You know guys, you can connect a PS3 using the same component HD cable you hooked your PS2 up with if you really want to cry about it some more..

And you can connect the same composite cables from the PS2... So really, still a sorry excuse from a company that claims to be THE solution for HD and 3D content not to include HDMI that gives you both out of the box.

At this point most people have moved from SD to units that have HDMI inputs and I don't see where the extra cost is for them considering those cables are probably more mass produced than their proprietary AV output offerings

10-02-2012

TDbank24

The super slim PS3 looks nice overall but i just hate that top loading disc tray. Seems like such a step backwards and those ridges are just ugly looking.

Oh well, it plays games right? :eek:

10-02-2012

Soldier 95B

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lethal_NFS

I know that does not stand in the US seeing how SD tv's have not been sold in stores in the last decade.

I am willing to bet that at LEAST 30% of the US population is still using SDTVs in homes.

SDTVs were still in stores in the US AT LEAST until 2008.

10-02-2012

Nitey

Saw it in person on the weekend. It's nice looking, nothing spectacular. The size compared to the fatty is crazy