The bill also requires a more detailed reporting of expenditures from seized assets, empowers the state auditor to audit and investigate expenditures of seized funds, and instructs the attorney general to initiate court proceedings against an entity in possession of seized assets if they violate the law. The AG may seek a civil penalty up to $100,000 against a "law enforcement agency or attorney representing the state" for such violations.

These additions give some much-needed teeth to the asset forfeiture statute since its provisions until now have basically been unenforceable. As Sen. Whitmire told the Chicago Tribune:

"The law has gotten away from what was intended, which was to take the profits of a bad guy's crime spree and use it for additional crime-fighting," Whitmire said. "Now it's largely being used to pay police salaries—and it's being abused because you don't even have to be a bad guy to lose your property."

Regrettably, the legislation stops short of requiring a criminal conviction before assets may be seized, which would be my preference, but it will at least provide more documentation about seized funds, restrict documented abuses, and create an enforcement provision, erecting new barriers to the kind of shakedowns described in East Texas.

19 comments:

Anonymous
said...

Grits: Reminds me of Rick Roach, the DA from Pampa, who also misused proceeds this way and as far as I know is still in the federal pokey. By the way, DA hot check funds are misused as well. By law, who is charged with auditing these funds and where would one (in county government) go to see where these funds are being spent?

Greg Abbott wants the power that now is in the hands of the Travis County DA department of Public Integrity. Whitmire's bill assumes this transfer of power, proposed by other bills in this session, is a foregone conclusion.

I'm not sure it is a good idea.

WHO is going to police the Attorney General and his HUGE staff?

The Public Integrity Unit of the Travis DA has been ineffective because the Leg has refused to appropriate funding. Only $4 mil a year for an office with statewide jurisdiction over more than 250,000 State Gov employees.

I proposed an INDEPENDENT 'State Integrity Unit' (its not about "public integrity" but integrity of State Gov Actors). Could not find a Legislator to author & sponsor such a bill.

"The law has gotten away from what was intended, which was to take the profits of a bad guy's crime spree and use it for additional crime-fighting," Whitmire said. "Now it's largely being used to pay police salaries—and it's being abused because you don't even have to be a bad guy to lose your property."

Just more grandstanding. Read the law you passed senator. Payment of salaries are permitted.

The bill forbids:• prosecutors as well as police from requesting or inducing someone to sign a waiver of property rights until after forfeiture proceedings have been initiated in court. • using forfeiture funds for campaign contributions, alcohol, judicial training, or donations to nonprofits unrelated to public safety. • a retiring official from spending money (as happened with the Harris County Sheriff) on their way out the door without approval by the commissioners courtAgain senator, read the law you passed, don’t leave it up to some staffer to do it for you. All of the above are already prohibited, just not enforced.

The problem with a lot of the Texas CCP is contains a lot of "do not’s," it just doesn’t have enough "or elses."

"Isn't there a federal Law that covers asset forfeiture and use of funds? Most law enforcement get their drug money from piggy-backing federal agencies cases using money laundering units."

Yes, but all it states is that the forfeited funds be used for a "law enforcement purpose."

Local and state law enforcement agencies have several ways they can get around state forfeiture laws and they do frequently.

First way is to have the FEDS adopt a forfeiture. FEDS keep 20% and the state and local gets 80%. Like state law, all you need is preponderance (51%); it's a civil procedure; and it's easy.

Second way is to have a member of your PD assigned to a FED task force. Most PD's send their TIRD over there; the Federal agency gets help albeit a TIRD; and the agency gets a % of their overall profit.

There are auditors that work for the US Marshal's service but they don't make waves. These accounts generally have very large piles of money in them and they're used at the discretion of the CHIEF.

In summary, drug dealers and the police have the same motive; money. Whether it is or not is left up to the imagination of the officer who takes it. It's more profitable to exaggerate than tell the truth. Scary

In Merrye Olde England, it was unsafe to travel the roads because of the criminal 'highwaymen'. Such 'freelance socialists' would demand that you 'stand and deliver' your valuables, or risk death.

Nowadays, the role has been taken over by The State, whose minions, armed with both a weapon and a badge, are doing the exact same thing to any who are unfortunate enough to fall into their hands. Whether they are actually guilty of a crime or not.

And police have the temerity to wonder aloud at the growing distrust and hatred of them?

There's a good reason why 'asset forfeiture' had remained an unused tool from Revolutionary times to the 1980's, and that was because of the GLARINGLY OBVIOUS POTENTIAL FOR ABUSE. Which opponents of the practice pointed out long before it was so short-sightedly implemented. But thanks to the anti-drug hysteria of the 1980's and the seeming desire to appear 'tough on crime!', those warnings were shouted down. And now we have messes like Tenaha all over the country. All very predictable. So nobody with three brains cells to click together should be surprised.

CNN/360 Anderson Cooper ran a story last week about the racket in Kimble County, Texas, where the DA takes the judge who hears the cases to Hawaii, and gives the judge thousands of dollars. The piece is still on CNN/360's website, titled "Good Cop/Bad Cop." The Texas AG will do nothing. The AG is worthless.

"I always tell people interested in these issues that your blog is the most important news source, and have had high-ranking corrections officials tell me they read it regularly."

- Scott Medlock, Texas Civil Rights Project

"a helluva blog"

- Solomon Moore, NY Times criminal justice correspondent

"Congrats on building one of the most read and important blogs on a specific policy area that I've ever seen"

- Donald Lee, Texas Conference of Urban Counties

GFB "is a fact-packed, trustworthy reporter of the weirdness that makes up corrections and criminal law in the Lone Star State" and has "shown more naked emperors than Hans Christian Andersen ever did."

-Attorney Bob Mabry, Conroe

"Grits really shows the potential of a single-state focused criminal law blog"

- Corey Yung, Sex Crimes Blog

"I regard Grits for Breakfast as one of the most welcome and helpful vehicles we elected officials have for understanding the problems and their solutions."

Tommy Adkisson,Bexar County Commissioner

"dude really has a pragmatic approach to crime fighting, almost like he’s some kind of statistics superhero"

- Rob Patterson, The Austin Post"Scott Henson's 'Grits for Breakfast' is one of the most insightful blogs on criminal justice issues in Texas."

- Texas Public Policy Foundation

"Nobody does it better or works harder getting it right"

David Jennings, aka "Big Jolly"

"I appreciate the fact that you obviously try to see both sides of an issue, regardless of which side you end up supporting."

Kim Vickers,Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and EducationGrits for Breakfast "has probably broken more criminal justice stories than any TX reporter, but stays under the radar. Fascinating guy."

Maurice Chammah,The Marshall Project"unrestrained and uneducated"

John Bradley,Former Williamson County District Attorney, now former Attorney General of Palau

"our favorite blog"

- Texas District and County Attorneys Association Twitter feed"Scott Henson ... writes his terrific blog Grits for Breakfast from an outhouse in Texas."