~ “I hope we once again have reminded people that man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: as government expands, liberty contracts.” Ronald Reagan.

CNN actually published an op-ed that puts blame on THE ONE, Barack Obama. CNN contributor Scott Jennings pointed out that the Mueller report looks bad for Obama. It’s hard to believe but we heard the network is preparing a nice place in Elba for him.

All of the Russia interference did happen under Obama’s watch.

THE ARTICLE

The partisan warfare over the Mueller report will rage, but one thing cannot be denied: Former President Barack Obama looks just plain bad. On his watch, the Russians meddled in our democracy while his administration did nothing about it.

The Mueller report flatly states that Russia began interfering in American democracy in 2014. Over the next couple of years, the effort blossomed into a robust attempt to interfere in our 2016 presidential election. The Obama administration knew this was going on and yet did nothing. In 2016, Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan Rice told her staff to “stand down” and “knock it off” as they drew up plans to “strike back” against the Russians, according to an account from Michael Isikoff and David Corn in their book “Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump”.

Jennings asked THE question: Why did Obama go soft on Russia?

My opinion is that it was because he was singularly focused on the nuclear deal with Iran. Obama wanted Putin in the deal, and to stand up to him on election interference would have, in Obama’s estimation, upset that negotiation. This turned out to be a disastrous policy decision.

Obama’s supporters claim he did stand up to Russia by deploying sanctions after the election to punish them for their actions. But, Obama, according to the Washington Post, “approved a modest package… with economic sanctions so narrowly targeted that even those who helped design them describe their impact as largely symbolic.” In other words, a toothless response to a serious incursion[…]

It hit me, “Why are we all pretending this is politics…when it’s revolution?”

Their media, our media, their talk-show people, our talk show people, all have to pretend to be matter-of-fact about a situation that is probably the most significant series of events in American history since the southern states seceded in 1860…

…all because a solitary man was elected with a solitary purpose, but which had to be postponed until he could complete the new mission his election forced on him, to win a civil war and restore the Union.

Out of the mouths of babes Beto O’Rourke, three term congressman from Texas, near-miss (by some accounts) senator from Texas, and sure fire presidential candidate for 2020, (assuming there will be a contested one) let it slip this week the dirty little secret that every one but the most self-delusional on his side knows to be true:

“The Constitution of the United States is no longer a fit foundation for a modern government. It is no longer relevant.”

For what it’s worth, I first heard this same concept in the classroom in 1968, as a lecture by a political science professor, his argument being that the structure of our society and economy was too complex for a ham-fisted Congress to manage or, or for the general population to have anything more than a ceremonial say in it.

He was of course echoing the thoughts of Wilsonian Progressivism from around 1910, and slashed me a letter grade for disagreeing with him on the final exam.

In other words, all the elements of disavowing the Rights of Man on the one hand, and keeping academic students in line on the other, were fully in place in the academy 50 years ago. Had I wanted to go on to pursue a masters and PhD, he would have insured I couldn’t. I’d been tagged[…]

In the meantime, while New York City is on its way to becoming a bigger shithole than Detroit, Chicago and parts of California, corrupt bureaucrats and the State’s judiciary are plotting to indict President Donald J. Trump.

A former federal prosecutor and Fox News contributor Andy McCarthy said Sunday that “it’s clear” President Trump is the target of a Southern District of New York investigation and prosecutors will indict him.

“The Southern District of New York case on Cohen, They are clearly going after the president on campaign finance violations, and I think if you read the sentencing memo the Southern District filed in Cohen’s case, it’s clear that Trump is the target and he’ll be indicted eventually,” McCarthy said on ‘Fox & Friends Weekend’.

McCarthy wrote in an op-ed that the DOJ guidelines say they can’t indict a sitting U.S. president. The statute of limitations will run out if he serves two terms, McCarthy said.

The Democrats made certain Republican Dinesh D’Souza was put in prison but when Barack Obama had a violation of $2 million, all his campaign had to do was pay a fine. The violations were arguably minor, however.

Barack Obama, envious of President Donald J. Trump’s legacy after just one year in the White House and the elimination of his unconstitutional and anti-American executive orders attacked Fox News and its viewers again.

According to the malignant narcissist, viewers of Fox are “living on a different planet.” Obama wants to keep Americans in their dark about his criminal cabal and activities during the time that he besmirched the Oval Office. If only Fox viewers would watch NPR instead.

NPR, like CNN, is part of the Communist media complex who along with their comrades spews anti-Trump propaganda and lied to Americans for two years about the 2016 presidential election claiming until the final moments that Hillary Clinton would become the 45th president of the United States. Fakes news, propaganda, smear campaigns and espousing deep state talking are what Obama ordains real news. It’s not.

Look at it this way, Americans who do not watch Fox are in the dark about Obama’s unmasking, members of the Trump campaign and one only knows how many Americans.

The likes of NPR hides the sins of Hussein Obama from his body count to Uranium One, Operation Fast and Furious to his role in the non-existent Trump/Russia collusion narrative.

Yesterday, a new meme magically made its way into the 24/7 news cycle. What would we do without at least one new story a day pushing the, “But Russia, but Russia interfered” election narrative?

Reality Winner, yes, that’s her name, and I’m not concerned if she was born with it or not – it’s obviously her choice to go forth in life with being unconventional; fits everything else in her young life’s resume. Ms. Winner is of the millennial generation. A generation of young people (20-30+yr olds) who think they own the world and can run it. If you watch any of the cable news channels, and then hang in there for viewing the old standbys of NBC, ABC, and CBS, they’re mostly populated by this age group. The old folks are being driven out.

So, this generation of young people produces a woman named Reality Winner, an Air Force veteran, speaker of several Iranian based languages, and at 25, she made it into a very high level security clearance level. Not too much unusual in that these days – FBI starts them young, and the military certainly has their fair share of young people in incredibly responsible positions.

But how did Ms. Winner get her security clearance? That’s the most important question that should be addressed.

Her background: military? check, foreign language capabilities? check, and supposedly being bright and intelligent made her marketable in the workplace. But in a high level security position? Now that is the box that shouldn’t have been checked. The red flags were all over this individual as regards her sentiments about loyalty and patriotism toward America.

This is where the only question I can ask is, “How in the world did she pass the background checks?” We have two scenarios to consider: 1) Incredibly sloppy work on the part of whomever was hired by the contracting firm she worked for to do these background checks, or 2) This was deliberate, ie. we’ll give her security clearances anyway because it suits our purposes. These days one has to consider the devious as well as the more simple explanation. On this, the Left is going to go with Occam’s Razor. Many of us fighting the Left will be open to much more serious analysis of why and how she did what she did[…]

Interesting discussion. And yes, no wonder Fox News’ ratings are sinking, they’re as bad as the alphabet channels and other cable media stations.

Senator James Risch, member of the Select Committee on Intelligence puts it on the line. President Donald Trump has not broken any laws. “The President has the right to do this and even the duty to do this.”

The problem here is that the D.C. elites of both parties they object to President Trump fulfilling the duties of the Commander-in-Chief.

When it comes to the leaks, the person leaking is committing which as far as I’m concerned, the media outlets who set up the drop boxes are complicit. All should be held accountable and not permitted to hide behind the first amendment. Treason is treason.