Friday, March 29, 2013

FOR YEARS, there have been efforts by
hard-working and seriously-dedicated city officers to document the
myriad hazards at 66 Franklin Street. Over the last DECADE the City’s
files are filled with Code Violations, negative Engineering Inspections,
warnings from Fire Officials, and urgent Complaints from Public Safety
experts.

There were SO MANY SAFETY CONCERNS that a DEMOLITION HEARING
was requested...BY THE CITY... and the Hearing was held on SEPTEMBER 3,
2010 before Judge James DOERN.

On that day, Judge Doern ISSUED a
SIGNED DEMOLITION ORDER and presented it to THE CITY... as per the
CITY's request. VICTORY for THE CITY!!!!!

As expected, SSPF challenged the Demolition Order with an
Appeal. So a Hearing was held before Judge JEFF WAIT on OCTOBER 6, 2010. Now,
just like you see on TV, THE CITY was certain to DEFEND their HARD-WON
DEMOLITION ORDER by bringing in a bevy of important WITNESSES-- Code
Enforcement & Building Inspectors & Engineers & Fire Officials
& Public Safety Spokesman and City Attorneys...right?

And like the Charter Change fight, the Mayor would surely
not hesitate to hire OUTSIDE legal expertise to DEFEND the Demolition Decision
that was celebrated by TWO offices—The MAYOR’s Building Inpectors AND the PUBLIC
SAFETY officers. If ever there was a time for a VIGOROUS defense of a city
VICTORY, THIS was the CASE…right?

Well guess what--
On the Hearing date, only ONE person showed up from the City.... and that was
Assistant City Attorney Tony Izzo. All alone.

JUDGE WAIT was so stunned by the one-man turnout that he remarked on the
transcript that he thought the CITY’s move was

“a little odd.”

The
REASON that no City Official showed up is that they had all received orders
from HIZZONER to NOT SHOW UP. They were all TOLD to sit in their offices and
offer no testimony, to make ZERO EFFORT to defend the City's valid DEMOLITION
ORDER.

This made for many happy SSPF blue-bloods who vociferously support the Mighty
Mayor. And it made for a VERY happy SSPF attorney who faced no certified
experts. The Owner has been forced to spend THOUSANDS in the two-year fight to
RESTORE the original VICTORY for the Safety-Oriented city.

That victory came onMarch 12, 2013 when Supreme Court Justice Thomas Nolan ruled "Here, the
administrative record compiled was extensive, if not massive, and
contained substantial evidence and provided reasonable basis for the
conclusion that 66 Franklin Street's structural failure and overall
deterioration posed a danger to public health, safety, and welfare."
So did the Mayor choose to leave City Residents at risk from an unsafe
structure that would be gone if not for the Mayor's interventions? So was the
Mayor/Lawyer… who spends freely to contest every legal LOSS… was he actually
WALKING AWAY from a legal VICTORY???
Here's a link to help navigate the file of the Legal Process--http://nowherethisnews.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=3

...sadly without ONE SINGLE memo from the man who meekly lets
Deputy Mayor Shauna do his talking for him.

COULD the mayor have intervened inappropriately by
insisting that no city officials testify against the interests of the SSPF? And
might he have received funds from SSPF members for crippling the City’s legal
argument? Or does mayor Scott simply “like” the SSPF?

COULD the mayor have denied the advantage of outside legal
assistance to the City to allow the SSPF to face the weakest city defense?And might he have received funds from SSPF
members for his crippling the City’s legal argument? Or does mayor Scott simply
“like” the SSPF?

COULD the mayor have arrogantly abandoned the city’s
hard-won Demolition Order and left the city’s fight to a private individual?
And might he have received funds from SSPF members for his crippling the City’s
legal argument? Or does mayor Scott simply “like” the SSPF?

COULD the mayor have appointed the SSPF Director to his
13-member Planning Commission as a Thank You in political payback? And might he
have received funds from SSPF members for giving them a seat at a very
important table? Or does mayor Scott simply “like” the SSPF?

While I CAN track donations to the mayor’s campaigns, I can
NOT match the individuals against the membership of the SSPF… because the SSPF
has refused to provide a list of their members.

SO considering the Court proceedings of October 6, 2010...
is anyone still so certain the mayor has allowed the SSPF to beat the city in
Court without “sacrificing his honor, integrity and soul?” And in those same
Court proceedings, do you believe the mayor’s actions showed “nothing
nefarious” as victory was hand-delivered to the SSPF? And do you still look at
the mayor’s “do-not-testify” instructions and “see no Mayoral involvement at
all”?

I am most thankful for all the sources in City Hall who
spoke openly and angrily as they were forced by the mayor’s edicts to abandon
the work they do with such dedication and commitment. I share their sincere
disgust and I will protect their wishes to remain anonymous.

NYRA- How Safe a Bet?

Who ARE these guys?

I've been a journalist since Watergate and an American by the grace of God. The only thing that disappoints me more than America's political decline is the absolute collapse of reliably solid investigative journalism. Nothing short and senseless here. No Britney or Lohan. NOR will you find any ridiculous ravings of a conspiracy quack. What I DO HAVE are sources and the time to read newsites from other countries. I don't text and I don't use emoticons. Words are far too precious. Serious analysis is all too rare.