Hey that's "MINE!!"....Old Paradigm Stuff

Hey that's "MINE!!"....Old Paradigm Stuff

Let me tell you a story about two guys, one idea and the potential to change the world...A few years ago I was involved in a start up
business that revolved around an exclusive distribution contract,
enabling our company to be the sole distributor of this particular
product in the United States. In the beginning, the biggest concern was
whether or not the tech had U.S. based patents. "What would happen if
someone were to reverse engineer the technology!?" was a constant
concern our potential investors freakishly posed. Another company could
"steal" our idea, thereby robbing us of profit which is rightfully ours!
I lived in this world and the systems that controlled it all made
perfect sense to me....at the time. It wasn't rocket science. If someone
created something, they should get the credit for it, right? They
should be able to receive maximum profitability as a result of their
blood, sweat and labor, right? There are many people who would say,
absolutely! It's only fair...I was one of those people. In fact, I still
believe the creator or inventor of an idea or product should be given
complete credit for their work. What I don't vibe with, is if someone
creates some "thing", and that particular something could help better
the lives of millions of people all around the world, but they choose to
hold onto it for themselves. Whether their motivation is greed,
control, money, power, success, to me it's all the same. I believe in
the idea that there's no such thing as an original thought. All thought
is derived from the collective conscience. Meaning it's not entirely
"ours," to claim. Look back into history with various inventions (I
suggest reading Source Field Investigations by David Wilcock) and you
will find that there are many cases of inventions/innovations/creations
which were developed at the same time by various individuals in
completely different parts of the world. This is caused by two or more
people tapping into the same frequencies within the collective conscious
at the same time, who ultimately end up producing a variation of the
same creation. Who gets to claim "ownership" of it, then? Does one
person have the right to say that it's "mine?" Giving credit to the creator is one thing,
but allowing an individual to hoard the creation (the idea), when it
could aid in assisting humanity live a higher quality of life is
misguided, plain and simple. Especially when those who wish to share it
desire to do so with no agenda for wealth, fame, power or control. I'm
sharing this perspective, which is only my personal opinion, because it
has great relevance to a situation that has been unfolding in the last
24 hours. So, let me digress and give some background for context.

A great friend of mine told me about a guy he
knew, named Daniel. Daniel had a unique skill set. One that made
him very special. He knew how to convert a car engine to run on
alternative fuels and liquids, including water. Not your everyday
household story that's for sure. Right off the bat Daniel and I hit it
off. His vision was to share his knowledge with help as many people
around the world as possible. The best part; he didn't give a rat's ass
about making money. I buzzed from head to toe with excitement. He had
the knowledge, I had the network. If we worked together we could get the
information out to people from all over the world, without the need for
investors, patents, or any of the old paradigm BS that has aided in
causing these kinds of technologies to be shut down in the past. It was
the perfect plan. So, we got together with the rest of the 5D Media
Network team and extended crew and started creating the foundation to
make this happen. The Universe aligned in every way imaginable to guide
the energetic trail. Synchronicity after synchronicity of perfect
harmonic flow. One huge leap after another of incredible manifestation.
Then, yesterday came...A gentlemen by the name of Paul Pantone, the
original inventor of a technology called GEET, which stands for Global
Environmental Energy Technology, contacted us. Paul was a bit upset, as
he had caught wind of what we we're doing with the OPAL Tour. He first
contacted a friend of mine, Sierra Neblina, and said he was concerned
for my safety and he wanted to help us out. So, I called him yesterday
on my way home from visiting Daniel. Daniel was one of Paul's
understudies and licensed teachers of the GEET technology. All I knew of
Paul is what Daniel had shared with me. He told me that in the
beginning he and Paul really got along. He felt Paul was in this for all
the right reasons, wanting to assist Humanity without interest getting
rich or famous. Because of this, Daniel offered his hard work, respect
and loyalty in support of Paul's vision. Then, somewhere along the way
his agenda changed, fueled by $$$$. Daniel and many
other trainers became a bit disenfranchised when Paul increased the fee
for training to a price very few people could afford. On top of that all
the major plans for developing the conversions were freely offered
online. Easy to see why their collective vision of helping humanity
quickly morphed from a reality to a dream. One that was slowly fading
away...When I spoke to Paul, I was very cordial, as I
always am. The first words out of his mouth were, "if you think you're
going to steal 36 years of my labor you've got another thing coming." I
replied that I wasn't stealing anything, all of the information I had
gathered thus far was widely available on the internet, which included
his own public website. Clearly he was upset. I remained calm and told
him I was eternally grateful for the contribution he had offered to
humanity. I was simply going to build upon what he had created and get
it into the hands of as many people around the world, as possible. I
also intended to do this for no charge. That also did not make him
happy. He went on to say that he had patents in 177 countries and if I
did that he would send the FBI after me. I responded back, "I'm sorry
you feel that way Paul. But my group does not buy into or support the
old paradigm patent systems, when they support the control of "anything"
that can help the people, such as this technology can. So, I told him
we would continue to move forward as planned." I assured him we would be
happy to give credit for his adjustment to the technology. Which I
later learned was just a few tweaks to what had already been created. I
openly shared our plans and intent, not hiding a single detail. He hung
up the phone and that was that.

I realize there are probably
going to be some people who read this and don't agree with my position
on how I'm handling this. That's okay. This world is changing, and I
will ALWAYS support those who need a helping hand. If a man stands on a
mountain of bread surrounded by many who are starving to death, making
the argument that it is "his" bread, I will NEVER stand by and let that
happen. It would be a whole another story if I took the bread and sold
it for $1,000 a loaf. Clearly, that's not the case here. We're doing
what we're doing for all the right reasons, which doesn't include fame
nor fortune. In fact, I've recently learned that all of Paul's patents
have been expired for years now. Patent Infringement is a civil, not a federal offense. That may concern me IF I felt there were any legitimate warrant to the fraudulent nature of statutes and codes in this country...http://www.generalpatent.com/patent-infringementI know why Paul is upset and I want everyone
who reads this to know that I don't blame him for it or have any ill
will toward him whatsoever, despite how he acted on the phone. He is
struggling financially, as many of us are at this time. My heart goes
out to him. I have nothing but love and gratitude for what he has done
and the contribution he has made to the world. In fact, I'm planning on
reaching out to him today to see if we can work out a deal to try to put
some money in his pocket. I don't want to see anyone struggle. As of
this moment, we are moving forward as planned, in full transparency,
liability and responsibility.. On the drive home from our meeting
yesterday, I told Michael from the tech team, "I'm not phased by this
new development. Any time something like this comes up we should
always guide the decision we make by asking ourselves what is the right
thing to do?" This my friends, IS the right thing to do. Get it to the
people. Assist humanity with this shift in ANY way possible, so long as
it represents the highest good for ALL that IS. ~BKQuick OPAL Tour Update: We just launched our
crowd funding campaign on Tuesday and we're already at almost 20% of our
total funding goal! It's a great start but we still need all the
support we can get! http://www.gofundme.com/4lafe0Watch this scene from Finding Nemo. There is much to be gained by reevaluating the nature of "ownership" in this short clip.