ii. Description of Information required:-
I wish to inform your kind perusal that, my wife XX XXX XXXXXXXXX D/o Mr/ XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX, R/o XXXXXXXX,XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX have filed a criminal maintenance case against me, in which she have claimed that, “she is not working anywhere”, as per my information she was/is working in your branch.

In view of above I humbly request you to furnish me the following information through the RTI Act 2005, in the interest of justice.

Period for which information required : 2000 t0 till date.

A. Kindly provide me the details of the XX XXX XXXXXXXXX in which Branch of EPF she is working, kindly provide me the date of Joining and the latest salary slip / details along with the E.P.F no if any.

B. Kindly provide me the details of the XX XXX XXXXXXXXXin which Branch of EPF she has worked, if she had left the job kindly provide me the date of Joining & date of leaving the job and the last drawn salary slip / details along with the E.P.F no if any.

b) The undersigned financial interest is affected in the matter, so undersigned is seeking legal relief from the Court.

c) The disclosure of financial details, mainly employment details of Smt Nayana Duchale would surely help me to show my innocence in court.

e) The disclosure of information sought is, therefore, in larger public interest. The information should therefore be provided.

f) BECAUSE, With Reference to CIC Decision No CIC/SG/A/2009/000106/3889 27 June 2009 in the case of Deep Public School D2, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi (The Commission has perused the information and does not see any merit in the exemption claimed under Section 8(1)(j) by the Chairman of the School-the third party. In view of this the information will have to be provided.)

g) BECAUSE, with reference to CIC Decision No CIC/AD/A/09/00366 Dated 4th May,2009(In this case Wife/Appellant asked certified copies of all documents of passport file including marriage certificate and application form as submitted in passport office. CPIO denied as per sec 8 (1)(j) CIC directed CPIO to provide information with remark Information being sought is not a thirt party information since the appellant is seeking information about hir leaglly wedded husband.

h) BECAUSE, with reference to CIC Decision No 3774/IC(A)2009 F.No CIC/MA/A/2009/000102 Dated 18th March,2009: ( In this matter wife asked information about her husbands medical expenses, service record etc CPIO denied citing section 8 1(J) . Honorable IC M.M.Ansari directed the CPIO to provide all information citing Since appellant is legally married wife with a child and has asked for details about her husband, there is no justification in withholding any part of information to the appellant as it would assist in resolving the issue by the competent authorityAs long as couple is not legally seperated refusal to share information …is untenable.

i) BECAUSE, with reference to CIC Decision No 1816/IC/(A)/2008 F.No. CIC/MA/A/2007/00583 Dated 10th Jan,2008(In this matter husband asked PF detail of wife. CPIO denied citing section 8(1)(j) .CIC directed CPIO to provide information to husband with remark The appellants financial interest is affected in the matter, as he is seeking legal relief from the court

Initial fee of Rs10/- in the way of Court Stamp Fee has been enclosed with application as prescribed under Right to Information Rules 2005.

It is requested that, the applicant is a citizen of India, would like to receive the above said information at most urgent on the address mentioned below. For any clarification contact undersigned at, Mobile No: 9923005066 or at address given below.

It is submitted that, the above information pertains to your esteemed office in your statutory capacity as CAPIO under section 5 (1) of RTI Act read with 5(4) and 5(5) of the RTI Act, 2005.

Now, at the end, I may reasonably expect that, honorable PIO will honor the decisions of CIC as stated above while making decision on this RTI application so that, at least the wastage of time of higher authorities in further proceedings and Legal hassle could be avoided in appeal while discussing the same matter.
Thanks & Regards,

Disclaimer:

The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Law which are bias against the Indian Husband. Thousands of 498A, DV Act 2005 & Maintenance cases are filed each year in India by women seeking to wreak vengeance on their husbands and in-laws. Enormous sums are extorted from intimidated families implicated in these cases by corrupt Indian police officers and elements of the Indian judiciary. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of expression – with all the protections this right guarantees.