Several groups in Europe as well as IRIS staff have put considerable effort into identifying a way in which researchers can give proper credit to operators of seismic networks. The attached document is the result of several months of discussions.This document is sent to FDSN WG-III for approval.

As the document contains some suggested modifications to the StationXML schema I kindly ask
you to have a look on that part specifically and provide feedback (if needed) before June 9.
If we have not heard back from you by June 9, we will assume you have no objection to the proposal.

Several groups in Europe as well as IRIS staff have put considerable effort into identifying a way in which researchers can give proper credit to operators of seismic networks. The attached document is the result of several months of discussions.This document is sent to FDSN WG-III for approval.

As the document contains some suggested modifications to the StationXML schema I kindly ask
you to have a look on that part specifically and provide feedback (if needed) before June 9.
If we have not heard back from you by June 9, we will assume you have no objection to the proposal.

I support the recommended extension to StationXML
to support the inclusion of DOI and other sanctioned
identifiers.

- Doug N

On 05/20/2014 02:55 PM, Sleeman, Reinoud (KNMI) wrote:

Dear members of FDSN WG II

Several groups in Europe as well as IRIS staff have put considerable
effort into identifying a way in which researchers can give proper
credit to operators of seismic networks. The attached document is the
result of several months of discussions.This document is sent to FDSN
WG-III for approval.

As the document contains some suggested modifications to the StationXML schema I kindly ask
you to have a look on that part specifically and provide feedback (if needed) before June 9.
If we have not heard back from you by June 9, we will assume you have no objection to the proposal.

Several groups in Europe as well as IRIS staff have put considerable effort into identifying a way in which researchers can give proper credit to operators of seismic networks. The attached document is the result of several months of discussions.This document is sent to FDSN WG-III for approval.

As the document contains some suggested modifications to the StationXML schema I kindly ask
you to have a look on that part specifically and provide feedback (if needed) before June 9.
If we have not heard back from you by June 9, we will assume you have no objection to the proposal.

Several groups in Europe as well as IRIS staff have put considerable effort into identifying a way in which researchers can give proper credit to operators of seismic networks. The attached document is the result of several months of discussions.This document is sent to FDSN WG-III for approval.

As the document contains some suggested modifications to the StationXML schema I kindly ask
you to have a look on that part specifically and provide feedback (if needed) before June 9.
If we have not heard back from you by June 9, we will assume you have no objection to the proposal.

Several groups in Europe as well as IRIS staff have put considerable effort into identifying a way in which researchers can give proper credit to operators of seismic networks. The attached document is the result of several months of discussions.This document is sent to FDSN WG-III for approval.

As the document contains some suggested modifications to the StationXML schema I kindly ask
you to have a look on that part specifically and provide feedback (if needed) before June 9.
If we have not heard back from you by June 9, we will assume you have no objection to the proposal.