Redistricting in Comparative Perspective

Edited by Bernard Grofman and Lisa Handley

The aim of this book is threefold. First to put in one place for the convenience of both scholars and practitioners the basic data on redistricting practices in democracies around the world. Remarkably, this data has never before been collected. Second, to provide a series of short case studies that look in more detail at particular countries with regard to the institutions and practices that have evolved for redistricting and the nature of the debates that have arisen. Third, to begin to look in comparative perspective at the consequences of alternative redistricting mechanisms and at the tradeoffs among competing redistricting criteria. This volume has contributions from some of the leading specialists on redistricting in the world. The chapters reflect a mix of country-specific material, chapters that are broadly comparative, and chapters whose contributions are more methodological in nature. The chapters in this volume provide an indispensable introduction to the institutions, practices, and consequences of boundary delimitation around the world.

Redistricting in Comparative Perspective

Edited by Bernard Grofman and Lisa Handley

Description

The aim of this book is threefold. First to put in one place for the convenience of both scholars and practitioners the basic data on redistricting practices in democracies around the world. Remarkably, this data has never before been collected. Second, to provide a series of short case studies that look in more detail at particular countries with regard to the institutions and practices that have evolved for redistricting and the nature of the debates that have arisen. Third, to begin to look in comparative perspective at the consequences of alternative redistricting mechanisms and at the tradeoffs among competing redistricting criteria.

This volume has contributions from some of the leading specialists on redistricting in the world. The chapters reflect a mix of country-specific material, chapters that are broadly comparative, and chapters whose contributions are more methodological in nature. The chapters in this volume provide an indispensable introduction to the institutions, practices, and consequences of boundary delimitation around the world.

Comparative Politics is a series for students and teachers of political science that deals with contemporary issues in comparative government and politics. The General Editors are David M. Farrell, Jean Monnet Chair in European Politics and Head of School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester and Alfio Mastropaolo, University of Turin. The series is published in association with the European Consortium for Political Research.

Redistricting in Comparative Perspective

Edited by Bernard Grofman and Lisa Handley

Table of Contents

Introduction, Bernard Grofman and Lisa Handley1. From Gerrymanders to Independence: District Boundary Readjustments in Canada, John Courtney2. An Independent Commission with Political Input: New Zealand's Electoral Redistribution Practices, Alan McRobie3. From Politics to Technicalities: Mexican Redistricting in Historical Perspective, Alonso Lujambio and Horacio Vives4. United States Redistricting: A Comparative Look at the 50 States, Michael P. McDonald5. Delimitation in India, Alistair McMillan6. Redistribution in Australia: The Importance of One Vote, One Value, Rod Medew7. The Politics of Redistricting in Japan: A Contradiction between Equal Population and Local Government Boundaries, Toshimasha Moriwaki8. Reserved Seats in National Legislatures: A Comparative Approach, Andrew Reynolds9. The Design of Ethnically Mixed Constituencies in Fiji, 1970-2006, Jon Fraenkel10. Race and Redistricting in the United States, David Lublin11. Electoral Boundary Delimitation in Ireland, John Coakley12. Redistricting in France under Changing Electoral Rules, Michel Balinski13. Delimiting Electoral Boundaries in Post-Conflict Settings, Lisa Handley14. Electoral Distortion Despite Redistricting by Independent Commissions: the British Case 1950-2005, Ron, Johnston, Charles Pattie, and David Rossiter15. The Partisan Consequences of Baker v. Carr and the One Person, One Vote Revolution, Thomas Brunell and Bernard Grofman16. Automating the Districting Process: An Experiment Using a Japanese Case Study, Toshishiro Sakaguchi and Junichiro Wada17. Districting in Eastern Europe: Regulations and Practices, Marina Popescu and Gabor Toka18. A Comparative Survey of Structures and Criteria for Boundary Delimitation, Lisa Handley

Redistricting in Comparative Perspective

Edited by Bernard Grofman and Lisa Handley

Author Information

Bernard Grofman received his B.S. in Mathematics at the University of Chicago in 1966 and his Ph.D. in Political Science at the University of Chicago in 1972. He has been Professor of Political Science since 1980, and on the faculty of the University of California, Irvine since 1976. His past research has dealt with mathematical models of group decision making, legislative representation, electoral rules, and redistricting. Currently, he is working on comparative politics and political economy, with an emphasis on viewing the United States in comparative perspective. He is co-author of 4 books and co-editor of 16 other books; he has published over 200 research articles and book chapters, including work in the American Political Science Review, the American Journal ofPolitical Science, the Journal of Politics, the British Journal of Political Science, Electoral Studies, Social Choice and Welfare, and Public Choice. Professor Grofman is a past President of the Public Choice Society.

Lisa Handley is President of Frontier International Electoral Consulting and a widely recognized expert on the drawing of electoral boundaries, her previous books include Minority Representation and the Quest for Voting Equality (with B. Grofman and R.G. Niemi, CUP, 1994).