Element 3 -
Intent
The third
element is
that the
defendant was
at or remained
at the
assembly with
the specific
intent to
engage in
conduct that
would
constitute the
crime of
riot. A
person acts "intentionally"
with respect
to a result
when (his/her)
conscious
objective is
to cause such
result. <See
Intent:
Specific,
Instruction
2.3-1.>

Conclusion

In summary,
the state must
prove beyond a
reasonable
doubt that 1)
that the
defendant
(assembled
with two or
more other
persons / was
present at an
assembly of
two or more
other
persons), 2)
the assembly
(was for the
purpose of /
developed the
purpose of)
engaging in
conduct
constituting
the crime of
riot, and 3)
the defendant
specifically
intended to
advance that
purpose.

If you
unanimously
find that the
state has
proved beyond
a reasonable
doubt each of
the elements
of unlawful
assembly, then
you shall find
the defendant
guilty. On
the other
hand, if you
unanimously
find that the
state has
failed to
prove beyond a
reasonable
doubt any of
the elements,
you shall then
find the
defendant not
guilty.