A limited constitutional government calls for a rules-based, freemarket monetary system, not the topsy-turvy fiat dollar that now exists under central banking. This issue of the Cato Journal examines the case for alternatives to central banking and the reforms needed to move toward free-market money.

The more widespread use of body cameras will make it easier for the American public to better understand how police officers do their jobs and under what circumstances they feel that it is necessary to resort to deadly force.

Americans are finally enjoying an improving economy after years of recession and slow growth. The unemployment rate is dropping, the economy is expanding, and public confidence is rising. Surely our economic crisis is behind us. Or is it? In Going for Broke: Deficits, Debt, and the Entitlement Crisis, Cato scholar Michael D. Tanner examines the growing national debt and its dire implications for our future and explains why a looming financial meltdown may be far worse than anyone expects.

The Cato Institute has released its 2014 Annual Report, which documents a dynamic year of growth and productivity. “Libertarianism is not just a framework for utopia,” Cato’s David Boaz writes in his book, The Libertarian Mind. “It is the indispensable framework for the future.” And as the new report demonstrates, the Cato Institute, thanks largely to the generosity of our Sponsors, is leading the charge to apply this framework across the policy spectrum.

Search form

Wall Street Demands Its Fed Nominees

Back in March the Senate Banking Committee voted out President Obama’s latest nominations to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Jeremy Stein and Jerome Powell. Since then these nominations have remained in limbo because Senator Vitter has objected to moving them by unanimous consent and it appears Majority Leader Harry Reid does not want to devote any floor time to these nominations (what, bother to debate important economic nominations?).

It has recently come to light, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, that both Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, have been pressuring Senator Vitter to release his hold and let these nominations move without any floor debate. As I’ve written elsewhere, Presidents of both parties have in recent years behaved as if Wall Street owned a certain number of seats at the Fed. It appears Wall Street has now come to collect.

Perhaps the real reason is that the Fed cannot use its 13-3 bailout powers without the support of 5 of its governors. The current number of governors is 5, which leaves little room for those seeking a rescue. One governor, Duke, has actually been serving beyond her term and is expected to leave. If she leaves without a replacement, the Fed cannot invoke its 13-3 powers. Of course Wall Street would like a few pro-rescue governors on board. Given that both Stein and Powell have served in bailout sympathetic administrations, it is a safe bet that they will come to the rescue of Wall Street when called.

Before some apologist for the administration starts to complain about Vitter “holding up the President’s nominees” remember that Harry Reid can call up these nominations anytime he likes, and Senator Vitter can do little to stop him. Doing so however would force a floor debate on these nominations (and perhaps the policies of the Fed), something I suspect Reid is hoping to avoid.