Submission Vetting Process

We use a manual vetting process for all submitted libraries. It can take anywhere between 10
minutes and a week to look over your library (this normally directly correlates to whether I'm
at work or enjoying a beer somewhere).

I don't have the time to communicate directly with each submitter, but if you're concerned that
I may not have looked at your library after a week's gone past then you can
tweet me and ask.

In the interest of transparency, the rules below are what I use to decide whether a library gets
added. If the answer to any one of these questions is "no", then I don't add the library.

Is the library focused on CSS or a preprocessor? (Some complementary JavaScript is OK,
but the core library should work with CSS or a preprocessor only)

Has the library been touched in the last three years?

Does the library have a README or maintained website?

Is the library original (not copyright infringing or a fork of a more popular repo)?

Is the library inoffensive/SFW?

Is the library/documentation written in English? (Sorry, the site currently targets
English speakers. There's definitely scope in future to open-source this site and
endorse other language versions of CSSDB)

As well as the above, I still maintain veto rights. I'll add to the list above if I need to.