This means that a referendum will now be organised[7] on whether or not to amend the existing definition of family and replace it with text that limits constitutional protection to the marriage of a different-sex couple only.

“This referendum is essentially asking people to approve discriminating against their neighbours, colleagues, friends and family members. Rainbow families, diverse family groups, loving families living in Romania right now are all threatened by this proposal.

Today, ILGA-Europe would like to reassure the diversity of families in Romania that we see you, we support you and will continue to stand with you.” commented ILGA-Europe’s Advocacy Director, Katrin Hugendubel.

Initiated in 2015 by the Coalition for Family (23 NGOs purporting to support family values), the signature collection campaign[8]’s overall aim is to amend the constitutional definition of family, limiting it to the marriage of a different-sex couple.

On 4 September, the Senate’s legal committees approved the initiative to hold a referendum. On 11 September, the Senate, sitting in plenary, approved the initiative by 107 votes; 13 senators voted against.

“Romania has a responsibility to protect all its citizens – straight and LGBTI. The definition of ‘family’ put forward by the supporters of this referendum is frankly inaccurate; it only captures a very limited fraction of what family means to people in 2018. And it is also very out-of-step with reality and with the diversity of families being recognised by international human rights bodies and European courts.” said ILGA-Europe’s Litigation Officer, Arpi Avetisyan.

As the referendum timeline becomes clearer, ILGA-Europe will continue to work closely with LGBTI activists and organisations in Romania during the campaign.

The proposal suggests altering Article 48.1[10] which currently states that “The family is founded on the freely consented marriage of the spouses, their full equality, as well as the right and duty of the parents to ensure the upbringing, education and instruction of their children”. The rewording aims to remove the reference to “spouses”, replacing it with a specific reference to one man and one woman.