The "Middle East and Terrorism" Blog was created in order to supply information about the implication of Arab countries and Iran in terrorism all over the world. Most of the articles in the blog are the result of objective scientific research or articles written by senior journalists.

From the Ethics of the Fathers: "He [Rabbi Tarfon] used to say, it is not incumbent upon you to complete the task, but you are not exempt from undertaking it."

-- a non-European like the Iranian-born Dabashi is
not only welcomed, but embraced by German audiences for two reasons:
hatred of Israel and the distortion of German crimes and the Holocaust.

Columbia University Iranian studies scholar Hamid
Dabashi has become the darling of German academe. It's no coincidence
that he exemplifies academic hatred for Israel and the trivialization of
Germans crimes and the Holocaust.

Columbia's Hagop Kevorkian Professor
of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature, Dabashi has experienced a
flurry of speaking engagements at German universities and
organizations. In May 2015, he was invited to speak at Freie Universität Berlin. On November 26, he spoke at the Institute for Foreign Affairs,
which is financed by the German Foreign Ministry, the state of
Baden-Württemberg, and the city of Stuttgart in the Southwest of
Germany. The event was hosted by the Berlin Social Science Center. The
day before, Dabashi spoke at the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, associated
with the Party of the Left, which is known for several antisemiticscandals in recent years. In May 2016, Dabashi will be one of the keynote speakers at the "Third Bremen Conference on Language and Literature in Colonial and Postcolonial Contexts."

Germany is a hotbed of academic antisemitism, particularly in the fields of Islamic and Middle Eastern studies.
Germans are particularly pleased with non-European scholars, such as
Dabashi, who will defame Israel and downplay the crimes of the
Holocaust. French philosopher Vladimir Jankélévitch analyzed this new
antisemitism as early as 1971 in his piece, "Forgiving?"

("Pardonner?"),
in which he noted Germans' need to accuse Jews of being "like Nazis."
Turning their former victims, the Jews, into perpetrators diminishes the
Germans' unprecedented crimes. Scholarship labels this the "inversion of truth." It can also be framed as "secondary anti-Semitism," a form of post-Holocaust antisemitism. Denying Auschwitz is for beginners.

Dabashi calls his new book, Can Non-Europeans Think?
(April 2015), part three of his "Intifada trilogy." In it, Dabashi
promotes the trope, popularized by anti-Israel activist Ilan Pappé, that
Israel is committing an "incremental genocide" of the Palestinians. Palestinian sources
themselves admit that the populations of Gaza and the West Bank have
grown in recent decades, rendering this definition of "genocide"
particularly perfidious.

As I demonstrated in my 2013 book, Dabashi wants to destroy the Jewish state of Israel, which he calls a "racist Apartheid state." He supported
German former Waffen SS member and Nobel Prize Laureate Günter Grass
after he'd written a nasty anti-Israel poem portraying Iran as a victim
of Israeli aggression.

According to international scholarship and the US State Department, the comparison or equation of Israel to Nazi Germany is antisemitic in effect if not intent. In 2014, as Martin Kramer noted, Dabashi equated Auschwitz with Gaza with his article, "Gaza: Poetry after Auschwitz." In a leading German daily, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), DirkBraunstein
of the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research, an expert on the
philosopher Theodor W. Adorno — whom Dabashi employed for his flawed
comparison — proffered the same criticism.

Dabashi is eager to use Jewish philosophers such as Edmund Husserl, eminent Zionist Emmanuel Lévinas, and Adorno — who was very pro-Israel, as recentscholarship,
including my own, has shown — for his anti-Semitic purposes. He is
influenced by anti-Zionist, post-colonialist authors Edward Said, Gianni
Vattimo, and Walter Mignolo. Mignolo, an Argentinian-born supporter of
the anti-Jewish state resolution, "One State Solution," wrote the foreword to Dabashi's Can Non-Europeans Think?

[T]he Jewish Holocaust was not an aberration
in European history. Rather, Europeans actually perpetrated similar
crimes against humanity on the colonised world at large.

This is an extreme distortion of history, a lie, and a
denial of the unprecedented evil of the Holocaust, in which Germans (and
their helpers) killed six million Jews. Never before was there the
intention, plan, and the infrastructure to murder an entire people.
Auschwitz was a complete breakdown of civilization and not in any way
comparable to crimes committed during colonialism, imperialism, or any
other atrocity in history. It was no less than the industrial slaughter
of a people. Millions of other Jews were deported to the woods of
Eastern Europe and eradicated. It was in every way unparalleled.

The government-sponsored German Institute for Foreign
Affairs and other leading universities would never host a known neo-Nazi
who claims that Israel is an "apartheid state," that Auschwitz was a
mere "crime" on par with the 2014 Gaza war, and that the Iranian threat
does not exist. However, a non-European like the Iranian-born Dabashi is
not only welcomed, but embraced by German audiences for two reasons:
hatred of Israel and the distortion of German crimes and the Holocaust.

Can non-Europeans think? Of course. Can non-Europeans be
antisemites and hateful agitators, obsessed with the trivialization of
the Shoah as well as with the destruction of the Jewish State?
Obviously, yes. Dabashi proves the point.