Unfortunately for the people of the world everything is going according to the New World Order Plan. But what is this New World Order Plan? In a nutshell the Plan is this. The Dark Agenda of the secret planners of the New World Order is to reduce the world's population to a "sustainable" level "in perpetual balance with nature" by a ruthless Population Control Agenda via Population and Reproduction Control. A Mass Culling of the People via Planned Parenthood, toxic adulteration of water and food supplies, release of weaponised man-made viruses, man-made pandemics, mass vaccination campaigns and a planned Third World War. Then, the Dark Agenda will impose upon the drastically reduced world population a global feudal-fascist state with a World Government, World Religion, World Army, World Central Bank, World Currency and a micro-chipped population. In short, to kill 90% of the world's population and to control all aspects of the human condition and thus rule everyone, everywhere from the cradle to the grave.

Demonetisation of Gold, Floating Exchange Mechanism, King Dollar and Globalisation

The green shoots of Globalisation and the demonetisation of gold (the great effort to supplant gold as the basis of the monetary system with the international fiat money standard) were seen at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, held on July 1–22, 1944 at the Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. Consequently, this new economic system arising from this conference is commonly called the Bretton Woods exchange rate system. Here, 730 delegates from 44 countries representing governments and the corporate aristocracy –the Global Elite- deliberated upon and signed the agreements that established a New International Economic Order policed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD or World Bank), the International Monetary Fund and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The World Bank was designed to make long-term capital available to states urgently needing such foreign aid; the IMF was tasked to finance short-term imbalances in international payments in order to stabilise exchange rates; and GATT was assigned to promote trade by the reduction of tariffs and import quotas. Thus, as the Second World War ended the victors determined to reorganise the world economy according to their precepts and publicly declared their intention to solve global economic problems before they become unmanageable and potentially catastrophic. In the words of Secretary of the US Treasury Henry Morganthau (1891-1967), during his Opening Address at the Bretton Woods Conference, participants were there for the:

"Creation of a dynamic world community in which the peoples of every nation will be able to realise their potentialities for peace … [and to] drive the usurious moneylenders from the temple of international finance."

The mutual consensus at the Conference was that the root causes of the economic and political crises of the 1930s – namely the great depression and the rise of Fascism- lay in the collapse of international trade, the growth of protectionism and isolationism as national governments sought to defend their immediate domestic interests at the expense of the global economy as a whole. Furthermore, the free movement of capital around the world had destabilised national economies and set in motion the competitive devaluation of national currencies that played such havoc with international trade. The movers and shakers at the Conference averred that if global managed responses were active then these crises could have been avoided. The post-war governments, whose representatives attended the Bretton Woods Conference, were thus in agreement (often called the Keynesian Consensus) about four main objectives of economic policy:

Full employment

Price stability

Economic growth

Balance of payment equilibrium

The system of fixed exchange rates between currencies and support for countries that ran into balance of payments difficulties was the chosen system to facilitate this managed response to national government excesses or poor management. By the summer of 1946, the required number of governments had ratified the treaties and the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund had begun their nefarious operations. The Bretton Woods Agreements were thus the architecture of a post-World War II international financial system that has largely stayed in place, despite major shifts in monetary policy, especially the elimination of the gold standard. The New York Times termed the policies formulated at Bretton Woods "a new conception of world order," while The Economist called it an "entirely new and dynamic conception of post war world relations." The Bretton Woods Conference policies established the IMF whose primary concern at the time was to secure a gold standard and ensure predictable monetary values deemed necessary for post war international trade. The Secretary of the US Treasury Henry Morgenthau speaking at the Economic Club of Detroit on February 26, 1945 said the general thesis behind the IMF was that it would be the mechanism for a "post-war economy of full production and full employment."

The other significant formula devised at the Bretton Woods Conference was the designation of the US dollar ($) as the International Reserve Asset, replacinggold in this role, and a system of fixed exchange rates between national currencies. Under this system, the dollar ($) alone was to be fully convertible to gold, and then only by foreign Central Banks, while other currencies would be convertible to dollars at fixed exchange rates. In short, the US Dollar was to be heavily promoted as if it was "good as Gold." An impossible task, since paper money has never, and can never, supplant Gold as the immutable standard of value in the economic affairs of men. However, its promoters have succeeded temporarily in this by foisting the US dollar onto the world as its reserve currency.

In summary, Bretton Woods Agreements were that:

The value of the US Dollar was to be fixed in terms of gold ($35 per ounce)

The value of all other major currencies were to be fixed in term of US Dollars and their exchange rates maintained within very narrow limits i.e. the US dollar was the world currency thereby conferring great advantages on the US.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) would police the "fixed rates" international monetary system, would extend credit to countries in (temporary) balance of payment difficulties and would allow changes in rates of exchange when a permanent imbalance was seen to have developed

The seeds of Globalisation were sown years before the Bretton Woods Conference. Its first green shoots can be seen in the so-called "Lend Lease" agreement negotiated by President Roosevelt and the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1941. "Lend Lease" was the mechanism by which the US provided financial and material assistance to the British war effort while the British people's gold was transferred in payment to the US. The shape of the post-war international economy was very much to the fore in these talks since, much to the surprise of the British, the Americans insisted on the insertion of a clause in the Atlantic Charter that guaranteed "free trade" and "access to markets." Consequently, both governments were committed to:

"... further the enjoyment by all States, great or small, victor or vanquished, of access, on equal terms, to the trade and raw materials of the world."

It appeared that the US was determined that Britain's ascendancy in the markets predicated upon its old empire was to be destroyed in the post-war world. John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) the chief British negotiator at Bretton Woods was also convinced that the Americans had used the vantage of Lend Lease as a means to destroy Britain's pre-war financial and trading system, based on the sterling area and imperial preference. However, according to Keynes, as far as Britain was concerned given its precarious economic state after two World Wars, the chief aim in negotiations with the US was:

" ... the retention by us [the British] of enough assets to leave us [Britain] capable of independent action."

Although certain fundamental issues divided them, both the British and US officials were agreed on one thing: the pre-war situation where capital was free to move unrestricted all over the world could not repeated. A system was needed whereby international trade could take place without the perturbations that had bedevilled the world economy in the 1930s: a system in which the movement of capital was not allowed to disrupt trade and currency relationships. Keynes asserted that the free movement of capital militated against the establishment of regulated capitalism at which the new agreement was aimed. In addition, the apparent threat of Communism, but especially that emanating out of Soviet Russia, dominated the post war political situation. This growing threat seemingly convinced Capitalist governments that to avoid the parlous times before the war then the economic conditions of the 1930s must not be repeated. It was in this context that Keynes explained the necessity for capital controls. Keynes explained it to the policymakers at the Bretton Woods conference thus:

"Freedom of capital movements is an essential part of the old laissez-faire system and assumes that it is right to have an equalisation of interest rates in all parts of the world. ... In my view the wholemanagement of the domestic economy depends upon being free to have the appropriate rate of interest without reference to the rates prevailing elsewhere in the world. Capital control is a corollary to this."

Keynes, ever the Fabian Socialist, declared that this mechanism of control was necessary since any government that attempted to enact socialist policies, such as unemployment insurance and other social welfare measures, would find its programme undermined by flight of capital organised by the "wealthier classes." Put differently, to successfully bring about the creeping collectivisation of the West, government and the socialist agenda had to be protected from the destabilising effects produced by concerned capital and its consequence: the flight of capital. The Bretton Woods Agreement gave this protection. This pseudo-socialist tampering with the free market economy is often call "Keynesian economics" in honour of its most able proponent.

The Bretton Woods Agreement (especially the system of fixed exchange rates between currencies, support for countries that ran into balance of payments difficulties) together with the Marshall Plan (1947-50) for the economic reconstruction of Europe laid the foundations for the post-war international financial system, which for a quarter century nurtured economic expansion the like of which had not been seen. For, the rapid growth of the global economy was spectacular and the living standards of people in the West rose substantially. Nevertheless, those who designed the Bretton Woods System always considered it to have temporary utility, as its purpose was never to save capitalism from itself or Communism but to help slowly bring about its death. By such gradual, almost imperceptible, changes are great revolutions achieved without alarming those who would otherwise oppose them out of conviction or those because who have much to lose because of them. The spectacular economic expansion fostered by the Bretton Woods System brought to the surface the inherent contradictions wrought by Keynesian-type regulation that eventually led to the demise of the regulated post-war order. The history of the apparent breakdown of the Bretton Woods Agreements involves two inter-linked phenomena:

The development of an increasingly global system of production and finance (i.e. nascent Globalisation)

The relative decline of the US within the Bretton Woods order that appeared to move administrations towards a new regime based on the free movement of capital in order to maintain America's position of global hegemony.

The first cracks in the post-war economic order arose from the emergence of so-called "Euro dollar market," which emerged at the end of the 1950s. The initial agreement on currency values had provided for free convertibility, which had proved to be impossible until 1958. However, at the approach of the free conversion deadline there occurred a crisis of sterling in 1957 to which the British government responded, as it was entitled under Bretton Woods, by restricting the movement of capital. This of course affected the operations of British banks that, fearful of being eclipsed by their trans-Atlantic rivals if the measures of the British government forced them to cut back on international lending, acted to circumvent the restrictions. Primarily, to continue their international operations despite the sterling controls they used the dollars deposited with them instead of sterling. The British government struck an ambivalent attitude to the development of this new financial market: on the one hand national policy dictated the need for financial controls; while on the other it was keen to ensure that London remained a centre of international finance.

Under the Bretton Woods Agreements, the US dollar functioned as a virtual world currency thereby conferring great advantages on the US both in economic and political terms. In theory, these advantages were supposedly limited by the proviso that the US dollar could be redeemed in gold at the rate of $35 per ounce. The gold backing system (i.e. the gold standard at $35 an ounce pegged to the US dollar ($) acting as the international reserve asset) seemed to operate smoothly while the mass of US dollars circulating in the rest of the world was perceived to be backed by gold held the US. However, the rapid expansion of the international economy caused a similar demand for international liquidity in the form of US dollars. In short: the more the global economy expanded, the more tenuous became the relationship between the US dollar and gold. In the 1960s, the difference between the dollars in circulation, both at home and abroad, and the value of the gold backing held in Fort Knox began to grow due to the increased US government spending on socialist programmes at home, investment abroad and on the military. To curtail this so-called "dollar overhang" the Johnson and Nixon administrations imposed policies, as it was entitled under Bretton Woods and just as had the British government in 1957, designed to restrict the movement of capital. Similarly, US financial interests found the "Euro dollar market" a useful means for circumventing the actions of their own government: just as convenient as their British counterparts had found before them. The US government also struck an ambivalent attitude to the "Euro dollar market": although it attempted to restrict capital outflows to counter the balance of payments deficit, the burgeoning "Euro dollar market" meant that foreigners would be more likely to keep their holdings in US dollars, thereby easing the pressure on the US government to conduct prudent economic policies.

However, the burgeoning "Euro dollar market" caused the very thing both Keynes and Harry Dexter White, the chief US negotiator at Bretton Woods, had foretold: ever increasing amounts of capital would move around the globe outside the control of governments. In short: under such circumstances, the system of fixed exchange rates was unsustainable. Inevitably, currencies began to suffer with sterling came under pressure in 1967, followed by the dollar in 1968. More profoundly, in 1971, for the first time since before World War I, the US experienced a balance of trade deficit, leading to President Nixon's announcement on August 15 of the so-called "New Economic Program" in which he closed the "gold window" by severing the US dollar, the world's reserve currency, from gold. Attempts by Japan and other the European powers to resurrect the Bretton Woods system through the exercise of capital controls were vigorously opposed by the US government since they would have restricted its freedom of operation both domestically and internationally.

The Bretton Woods system, being a system of regulation that demands financial prudence, necessitated the US taking action to rectify the imbalances in its trading position. A major component in federal expenditure was of course military spending, escalating alarmingly because of America's Vietnam entanglement. However, pruning this would have meant scaling down the Vietnam War or negotiating a humiliating ceasefire that would weaken the US in relation to the other major powers. It was never an option. In 1971, Paul Volcker (later chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board) admitted that financing for US deficits had:

"… permitted the United States to carry out heavy overseas military expenditure and to undertake other foreign commitments [and that an important goal was to] free ... foreign policy from constraints imposed by weaknesses in the financial system."

Volcker, speaking in the 1990s, observed that:

"Presidents —certainly Johnson and Nixon— did not want to hear that their options were limited by the weakness of the dollar."

Another way to reduce the balance of payments deficit thereby easing the pressure on the dollar and so maintain a system of regulation would have been to cut the spiralling spending on socialist programmes undertaken by the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon administrations within the United States. However, this was not an option. Not merely because the consequences may have induce a severe recession or because of a rising tide of militancy in the working class, student radicalisation induced by the Vietnam War, and the rioting of Negro youth in the cities, but because the Shadow Government of America desired a creeping collectivisation of American culture. This covert, inexorable Bolshevisation of America is integral to the Globalist Agenda for World Government. Thus, the need to free the US from the system of controls on capital movements established at Bretton Woods. If these were scrapped then the US would be able to maintain its hegemonic position because of its pre-eminence within the world economy. Furthermore, other nations would still desire dollars because of its central role in the international monetary system. John Connally, the treasury secretary in the Nixon Administration remarked to a European audience with reference to their past desire to hold dollars and their immense holdings of dollars in the face of this new reality: "The dollar may be our currency but it's your problem." However, to an American audience he was more direct: "Foreigners are out to screw us. Our job is to screw them first."

One of the significant formulas devised at the Bretton Woods Conference was the designation of the US dollar ($) as the international reserve asset; that is, the world's reserve currency and the "king" of the international financial markets. Hitherto the British Pound had acted as the de facto world reserve currency since the Pound was treated as the principal currency of the world for over 100 years from 1816 to 1933: a consequence of it being the currency of the greatest empire the world had seen, Moreover, it was fully backed by gold. The other main component of the formula was the system of fixed but adjustable exchange rates between national currencies but especially against the US Dollar. Under this system, the dollar ($) alone was to be fully convertible to gold, and then only by foreign Central Banks, while other currencies would be convertible to dollars at fixed exchange rates. In short, the US Dollar was to be heavily promoted as ifit was "good as Gold." However, this is an impossible task, since paper money has never, nor either can it, supplant Gold as the immutable standard of value in the economic affairs of men. However, its promoters have succeeded temporarily in this by foisting the US dollar onto the world as its reserve currency that is supposedly "good as Gold." Nevertheless, the inevitable has happened and the dollar is now under such pressures that its survival as the world's reserve currency is not merely under threat but terminal.

During the Nixon Administration, the Bretton Woods treaties were largely dismantled in 1971 thereby deregulating the world's currencies. This together with a number of other changes, especially the demonetization of gold, tremendously expanded the amount of unregulated capital in the world, and accelerated what is called the Globalisation of the economy i.e. marking the beginning of a true global economy. Today essentially the Bretton Woods system has collapsed. Why? Because it was designed to collapse … it was meant to have temporary utility only and used to usher in a new economic order … Globalism … a necessary stepping-stone to the creation of the New World Order.

Like all aspects of the Evil Agenda unfolding on Earth, the move to the Global economy has been long and meticulously planned in secret unions by the cabal of very powerful men who constitute the true temporal power in this world. This Shadow Government are the true Lords of Power and the corporate aristocracy who appear to rule over the world's financial system, of whom the Rothschild and Rockefeller dynasties are pre-eminent, are merely the public representatives and not the real power that lies elsewhere: in this secret few. For, their immense wealth and power corrupts all human institutions they seek to co-opt into their Evil Agenda, which is the establishment of a World Empire under their direct control. This is the ancient dream of the secret societies throughout the ages and is often called the New World Order. However, to achieve this ancient ambition these inter-generational conspirators have to destroy the "Old World Order" but especially Western civilisation predicated upon the spirituality, the Natural Moral Order, arising from the Cross at Calvary. Since the assault on Natural Moral Order affects every aspect of human existence then the agenda, the Evil Agenda, is truly, truly massive. In the economic sphere, the activities of the Lords of Power, using international usury, centres upon:

Gaining control of the financial system and moulding it in their image thereby amassing the means and wherewithal to affect the wicked and malefic aims of their Evil Agenda

To dissolve all external controls, fiscal barriers, tariffs etc to facilitate the easy expansion and/or contraction of money supply and credit and the easy movement of money, wealth, goods, services and jobs across borders and around the globe: a process known as Globalisation.

The wealth of the world created by the exertions of the world's people, but especially that of the West and in particular that of the American people, was to be used for their own destruction; primarily by exporting the means of production from the Developed World to the Undeveloped World. That is, the sweated labour of the Orient newly equipped by international usury was to undercut and destroy the viability of the West. Not, as claimed by leftist commentators, in order that usury, international usury, may merely draw its dividends and its interest from the labours of coolies, but for a more sinister aim: to destroy the civilisation from which it arose through the equipment of the deliberately created world-wide competitors of the West. This phenomenon is euphemistically called "out-sourcing."

Western civilisation and her people, both the industrialist and the worker, have been relentlessly sacrificed to this internationalist dream of which Globalisation is simply a means to an end. That is, the redistribution of the wealth of the West around the world so that wages are equalised and everyone's living standards and expectations are akin to that of a Mexican peasant.

The international trading system, and the myth of conflicting political party systems, and, above all, foreign policy, is maintained for one reason and for one reason alone - that the money power of the world may rule the British, Americanand European peoples, and through them, rule mankind.

A crucial aspect of the Globalist Plan was the demonetization of gold: that is, getting the United States Government to deny that gold was legal tender. This was done on August 15, 1971 when President Nixon closed the "gold window" by severing the US dollar, the reserve currency for all the currencies of the Western world, from gold. Nixon's unilateral announcement had dealt the Bretton Woods Agreements a fatal blow since the commitment by the US to redeem international dollar holdings at the rate of $35 per ounce had formed the central foundation of the post-war international financial system set in place at the fateful conference of 1944.

This monumental legislation was part of the so-called "New Economic Program," which among other things called for a ninety-day wage, price, and rent freeze to be effective immediately; the imposition of a 10 percent surcharge on imports; a 5 percent cut in federal jobs and the postponement of federal raises; a request to Congress to repeal a 7 percent tax on automobiles; a 10 percent tax credit on new investments; rescheduling of an income tax cut planned for 1973 to January 1, 1972. Thus hidden behind the facade of prudent politicking was the fateful decision to remove gold from its ancient role as the arbiter of value and exchange. It was also in another sense a declaration of war against the US dollar. For, when Nixon signed gold into semi-retirement he also ultimately signed the death warrant of the dollar. President Nixon in the de rigueur formal language of Executive Orders had declared to the world that the United States would suspend settlement of international transactions in gold, thereby violating the 1944 international monetary agreement of Bretton Woods and panicking foreign holders of US debt. This not only severed the US dollar from gold but also had the effect of abolishing the 25 percent gold cover of the US dollar. Henceforth, the American dollar was not officially backed by gold. Consequently, the US dollar became a "soft" dollar, and gold become regarded by orthodox authorities not as a currency but simply a commodity.

The attack upon the dollar and ultimately gold came in late 1967 when the corporate aristocracy acting according to the dictates of the Shadow Government, the cabal of very powerful men who constitute the true temporal power in this world, caused their lackeys to dump billions of dollars and other currencies on the London gold market. The price of gold began to rise above the agreed limit set at the Bretton Woods Conference of $35 an ounce causing worried European finance ministers to support the official price of gold by selling off a part of their own gold reserves held by their Central Banks. Billions of dollars worth of gold was squandered in this futile attempt to stabilise the price of gold. The United States government declined to co-operate with the Europeans to stop the run on gold. Eventually in March 1968, the official price of gold became untenable and the European central banks ceased in their efforts. The forces against them were too great.

Subsequently, the price of gold had broken away from the fixed price of $35 an ounce and there was now a seemingly "free" market price for gold. The other main consequence of this stratagem was that official stocks of gold held by the central banks had become effectively frozen, which was the penultimate stage before the planned demonetization of gold. Finance ministers meeting in Washington on March 17, 1968 agreed that there now existed a two-tier gold market system. Although central bank gold could still be used in official transactions, it seemed prudent not to dissipate gold when the "free" market price was increasing. Moreover, the United States government had told Europe that it had suspended settlement of international transactions in gold (i.e. European central banks could not turn over its excess dollars to the United States in exchange for gold) then American dollars in Europe had become effectively frozen. Thus, the plan to abolish gold backing for the dollar was finally completed by executive order approved by Nixon but whose patron was the then Secretary of the Treasury, John B Connally, Jr. However, the true architects of the plan lay elsewhere and their source can be discerned when we learn that strong support for it came from the undersecretary of the Treasury for monetary affairs, Paul Adolph Volcker who before this appointment was vice-president with the Rockefeller-owned Chase Manhattan Bank; and who after became chairman of the board of governors of the Rockefeller-controlled Federal Reserve System (1979–87).

In short: Volcker was a faithful lackey of International Financier Oligarchs who are pushing the world into a global economic system under their total control, which is the precursor for the long planned, long dreamed, New World Order ... the Ancient Dream of the Secret Masters of the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies throughout the ages.