Katie Collman: Another Victim of the War on Drugs

Written by Paul Zimmerman

Katie Collman, a ten year old Crothersville, IN girl was murdered because she allegedly witnessed drug activity (http://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?S=2908865&nav=9TahW2m6). If not for continuing War on Drugs, Katie Collman would be alive today.

While killer of Katie Collman must bear responsibility for his monstrous actions, when will those who continue War on Drugs accept any responsiblity for consequences of their actions?

During Prohibition if someone stumbled upon a still or a bootlegger's warehouse, they'd be lucky to escape with their lives. Out of desperation some people drank wood alcohol and went blind or died. Organized crime received a shot in arm from revenues made possible by Prohibition. All deaths and mayhem, crime and corruption during Prohibition were predictable and preventable, and in fact ended with Prohibition. Why is that concept so difficult to understand when drug in question is not alcohol, but some other substance?

Invisible Slavery System - I

Written by Emmett Dabru

Invisible puzzles are mechanisms hidden inside products and services you use, and social/political systems you interact with. They are invisible due to use of manufactured perception and deniability-tactics. These puzzles are designed to harness everyone's efforts to silently maintain and operate an Invisible Slavery System...

What would happen to world economy if global problems like terrorism, global warming, pollution, drugs, cancer and AIDS were suddenly solved? These problems harness trillions of dollars per year, both directly and indirectly from poor, middle class, and rich. This money fuels a large portion of our economy and it eventually makes its way to a very few select people, "very few very powerful". These "very few very powerful" did not use principles found in your everyday how-to business books. They and their families engineered special techniques that led to their success, and they kept these techniques a family secret for hundreds, maybe thousands of years. The funny thing is these techniques can be looked up quite readily, but they still remain secret to vast majority because of combination of a deniability cloak and a perception cloak.

I will now begin to explain my own theory about these secrets, and how they relate to what is really happening in world today.

First of all, an "invisible puzzle" is just that, a puzzle that is invisible without some special way to view it. As it pertains to my theory, "invisible puzzle" more specifically refers to deniable lines of function that are hidden inside products and systems that we interact with. These invisible puzzles are there to control us in very direct tangible ways while shedding off proof of real purposes behind them.

For example, when bank processes several checks in one day for a specific customer they now wait to end of day and sort them by size, biggest first, smallest last. Many people wait to last minute to deposit their money, so an unsuspecting customer walks in during day and deposits amount to cover checks, asks for his balance, and breathes a sigh of relief to see that he was in time. The balance according to deposit slip is in black. He goes home with feeling that everything is in order. However, checks that were held to end of day can be back-posted to a time before deposit, since that is when they really came in. So customer's account is then returned to red prior to his deposit, as checks that were not reflected before are back-posted. Then these checks get posted in size order instead of chronological order, causing most possible overdrafts to be generated. Then as overdraft fees stack up, customer's account goes further negative than it would have otherwise, making deposit ineffective at stopping subsequent overdrafts from following day's checks. The customer's account spins out of control by potentially hundreds of dollars without his immediate knowledge so that he won't know in time to fix it before full damage takes place. The combination of these things cause overdraft income to increase three to four times on average. And that's if he deposited cash. If he deposited a check then deposit may post three days later (an arbitrary decision on part of bank) - and it doesn't matter if itís from a bank across street. You could have just walked cash across street but that makes no difference to bank. Sure, bank can make any rule it wants, and customer is legally at fault for letting his/her account go negative. But then bank purposely manipulates their paperwork to triple their income from it. And they do it legally. How? All they had to do to triple their overdraft income was to issue a notice to their customers stating something to effect: "From this point forward, in an effort to better serve our customers, whenever there are multiple checks to process in same day we will process biggest one first, second biggest one second, and so on, processing smallest one last. In this way if there are insufficient funds you are more likely to get your most important check through, such as your mortgage or car payment." This notice makes it impossible for customer to accuse bank of manipulating paperwork for profit. The deniable alternate purpose (manipulation of paperwork to triple overdraft profits) is hidden behind a perception cloak (the statement that change in calculations is to get your most important check through). As a result, this situation becomes an invisible puzzle.

Invisible puzzles can be used to manipulate, but you can't prove this intent because stated purpose makes potentially manipulative purpose deniable.

The interesting thing is, these invisible puzzles can be created through remote control. Every now and again a major world event hits news, like "9/11 terrorist attacks". Then millions of people everywhere are glued to TV full of emotion over event, waiting to see who is responsible and waiting to see what solution will be presented. Each time this happens no proof will be given for what really happened. That is one of keys to their technique. This is because of principle that when truth is hidden people will then look to some other source for answers, like authority or stereotypes. At this point perceptions are being engineered for a purpose. The purpose is to mobilize large groups of people into specific actions that create and enforce new invisible puzzles. In case of 9/11 terrorist event our security spending was tripled, dozens of new track & identify laws were launched overnight that wouldn't fly previously because of privacy activists, several major legislative acts and antiterrorist treaties were mysteriously completed in a matter of days (hmmm, I would have thought they would need more time than that), and our president declares to world "any country that is suspected of harboring terrorists will be attacked". Was this a declaration to world that we intend to deal with terrorists everywhere? Or was this a bully tactic to get other countries to sign our antiterrorist treaties to avoid suspicion of harboring terrorists so that we won't attack them? Another invisible puzzle?

The "terrorist event" was a perception-engineering tactic. It is easy to see that it was rigged, so long as you don't fall for mind control. Then antiterrorist treaty was pushed on other countries through a deniable bully tactic ("will attack if suspected of harboring terrorists", therefore better sign that treaty to avoid suspicion). Then antiterrorist treaties were used as Trojan Horse to carry a slew of new invisible puzzles into other countries. This method accomplishes two things. First, it delegates effort so controlling entity has less work to do. Second, it cloaks what is really happening. Once this step is successful then honest people in key positions who are just doing their job will generate dozens of new invisible puzzles. Of course they are doing their jobs while under influence of perception game at hand. So without knowing it they will create these new invisible puzzles, which control us through two or more levels of deniability. For example, when Canada signed on with our president's anti-terrorist treaties, they rerouted a major portion of their legal system to make room for demands of those treaties. Through this process a slew of new invisible puzzles for Canada went into place, with little or no additional effort by those who actually designed them. In other words, "very few very powerful" can efficiently delegate their work while simultaneously creating multiple levels of deniability - pretty slick if you ask me.