On 05/26/10 15:36, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> From my point of view, the most important failover related differences
> are that many bugs have been fixed. Bugs which could make dhcpd crash,
> make the servers in a failover pair unable regain synchronization after
> a network partition has been healed, etc.
>> We're running 4.1.1, and it's extremely stable for us. Knowing (and
> having experienced) quite a few of the bugs which have been fixed, I
> wouldn't dream of going back to earlier versions. The fact that 4.1.1
> supports IPv6 is a nice plus.
>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no>
Awesome. These war stories were exactly what I was looking for, in
order to help conclude 4.1.1 was the right way to go.
Thanks for your input.
--
Joshua West
Senior Systems Engineer
Brandeis University
http://www.brandeis.edu