>> If I have a container with say a 250 weight and I wear it, my carried
>> weight goes to 0 or to whatever else I'm holding. This to me, seems
>> like it should be a bug.
> Perhaps a bug, perhaps not. If you think of the weight as serving the
dual
> purpose of describing how much an object weighs and what its encumbrance
is
> when carried, it might make more sense. I can carry a lot less stuff if I
> also have to carry my clothing in my arms, but the clothing hardly slows
me
> down if I'm wearing it. The same goes for carrying a backpack.
I was thinking of a total encumbrance type of weight. The items worn work
towards the total encumbrance by only 1/2 and items in hand would be full
encumbrance. 50lbs on your back/body is a lot different from carrying 50lbs
around with ya.
Any ideas on implementation?
Rob-------------------
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
| Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+