Analysis

The first challenge for Church leaders will be how to deal with the fallout from this vote. Already some in the parishes are describing this as one of the Church's blackest days.

The damage will include a hammering in the media. The outside world will find the Church's continued inability to push this issue forward mystifying - especially as in so many other countries in the Anglican communion there are already many women bishops.

There will be many questions too about the Church's system of democracy where major change has to be agreed by two-thirds majorities amongst bishops, clergy and the laity.

The vote was only lost by a handful of votes amongst lay members, which means the vast majority of Anglicans are in favour and will feel deeply disappointed.

The next Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, will need all his legendary mediation skills to navigate a way forward and to find new legislation which accommodates more traditionalists without then alienating the liberal wing of the Church.

Both the archbishop and his successor, the Rt Rev Justin Welby, the current Bishop of Durham, were in favour of a "yes" vote.

Bishop Welby used his Twitter account to say: "Very grim day, most of all for women priests and supporters, need to surround all with prayer & love and co-operate with our healing God."

Canon Simon Killwick, vicar of Christ Church, Moss Side, and leader of the Catholic group in the synod, had spoken against the move and said the legislation was "flawed".

He said it would be possible for the issue to return before the next synod is elected in 2015 if there were "early talks held between the various parties and a real effort to build a bigger consensus".

Twenty years after the introduction of women priests, the issue has continued to divide traditionalists - among those on the Church's evangelical and Anglo-Catholic wings - from reformers.

Had the motion been backed by the synod, the proposed legislation would have made its way through Parliament before receiving royal assent.

It needed two-thirds majorities in each of the synod's three houses.

The votes were 44 for and three against with two abstentions in the House of Bishops, 148 for and 45 against in the House of Clergy, and 132 for and 74 against in the House of Laity.

The vote in the House of Laity, at 64%, was just short of the required majority - six more "yes" votes were needed.

The outgoing Archbishop of Canterbury was in favour of allowing women bishops

The House of laity is the largest element of the General Synod and is made up of lay members of the church elected by its 44 dioceses.

The decision came at the end of a day of debate by supporters and opponents - and a 12-year legislative process.

The Bishop of Norwich, the Rt Rev Graham James, said: "It is very disappointing that the vote was lost so narrowly."

Campaign group Women and the Church (Watch) said the outcome was a "devastating blow for the Church of England and the country".

The Rev Rachel Weir, chairwoman of Watch, said "This is a tragic day for the Church of England after so many years of debate and after all our attempts at compromise.

"Despite this disappointing setback, Watch will continue to campaign for the full acceptance of women's gifts of leadership in the Church's life."

Watch said bishops would need to act promptly to offer pastoral support in the coming weeks to women clergy and others who felt devastated by the decision.

Writing in the Guardian, Lucy Winkett, who would have been in line to become a woman bishop, said the synod was "detonating its credibility with contemporary Britain".

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

The Right Reverend Graham James: "Obviously it is very disappointing that the vote was lost"

But synod member Susie Leafe said the outcome was because of faults in the legislation.

She said: "There were a lot of places along the way that we could have had a measure in front of us that wouldn't have been voted down, and it's very sad that this was able to go on without us facing the reality of the situation."

The Catholic Group in General Synod said "mediation and conciliation are needed so that new legislation can be framed to provide fairly for all members of the Church of England".

The group said in a statement: "We regret the synod was put in the position whereby draft legislation failed at final approval because it was unclear and unfair in its provision for those who, in conscience, are unable to accept the ministry of women as bishops or priests.

"The Catholic Group calls on the House of Bishops to reconvene the talks started in the summer between representatives of different groups, chaired by Bishop Justin Welby.

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Zoe Ham, Church Society: "I am happy that the legislation in its form today has been rejected"

"The Catholic Group is committed to playing a full part in the process of achieving good legislation to enable us all to move forward together in mission and service to the nation."

Traditionalist campaign group Together 4ward said: "We are reflecting on and praying about the outcome of general synod, and will make a fuller statement in due course.

"We are, however, pleased that synod has chosen not to pass the Women Bishops Measure in its current form, which we believe would not have allowed the Church to go forward together."

The House of Bishops will hold an emergency meeting on Wednesday morning following the decision, a Church spokesman said.

Comment number 1941.

Comment number 1940.

freespeech21st November 2012 - 0:00

When will some of you learn to read? The bishops and clergy passed this measure, i.e. those who sit in the House of Lords, and are charged with the interpretation of doctrine, APPROVED this vote. It was the lay community, i.e. the church-goers' elected representatives, who blocked it.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.