> As usual, you draw unwarranted conclusions from everything.>> As one identifies a path as a particular set of digits or nodes, how is> asking you to identify your paths in any way overlooking them?

Since I have constructed or covered all paths that can be defined bynodes. There is no node that you could name that could define a paththat is not in the CIBT that I constructed.

> You have also not proved that your set of paths is countable, which can> only be done by proving that they can be listed, and most easily done by> providing such a list.

The paths that can be identified by nodes can be listed. It is the setof all finite paths extending from the root node to a given node. Youcan append them by whatever tail you want, because all these tails arealso covered by my construction. There is no node left out!