latest user's comments

im sorry but if there was a better word than indian, or middle easterner then i'd use it. Tell me, what word should i have used to describe a brown skinned man of indian/iraqi/iranian/arabian/or afghan decent? I can't think of what word i could have used. Black people have the term "black people" and mexican/spanish/venezuelan/puerto ricans have the term "hispanics" There is nothing wrong with these generalizing words, they just help label races easier.

But you are mislabeling a race when you call and Indian a derka! Anytime the Middle East is brought up in the news, do you think it is a coincidence that they never bring up India? Your logic is saying that anyone that is brown should be labeled as the same race when in fact they are not.

this isnt about what the news says. this is about what is socially relevant. anyone who is black is a nigger. anyone who looks like a chinese person is a chink. anyone who looks like hispanic is a spic. regardless of their actual background. if theres some sort of connection between any two groups of people, they will be interchanged.

they're actually kind of a sleazy people. People are too afraid to admit it cuz it will brand them as racist but in my personal experiences, most of them have been jerks, or feel as they are entitled to anything they want

But the point is you didn't use the term Middle Eastern or anything, you said India. Sure, in reality, anyone can be a terrorist. It's just that the world is used to the Muslim Radicals that brought it to worldwide focus. But what you said in the later comments did seem a little overboard in racism, and you should have just admitted it when you were wrong. A lot easier in the long run.

the reason why the plan was put into place was so that we could be more self sufcient. much of the oil would also comefrom our alaskan grounds which is actually very plentiful. I know we couldnt stop buying from the ME completley, but atleast we Iran. obama may be trying, but he is failing.

actually, canada has the most oil in the world by far, it's just stuck in the sands. the middle easts oil is just in pools underground and is extremely easy to take. in canada, the oil takes tons of resources and produces a lot of pollution to get, but there's a shit ton of it

I have taken Chemistry classes and researched these things. In reply to both of you, I would like to point out the the Middle East sits on about 62% of the planets oil supply, with a roughly 2-4% being in North America. The rest is scattered, the second largest quantity is near Venezuela, being at about 10% if I remember correctly.

Its just some of the shit he pulls like the pipeline deal. The only real source of income from the Middle East is oil. We are the largest consumers of oil and buy I'd say about 90% of our oil from the ME. recently there was a proposed oil deal. We were offered the chance to have pipelines from Canada come down to the U.S. but Obama refused. Because of him we are still throwing all of our money to countries like Iran who use it to build nuclear wepons in hopes of one day destroying us along with many other coutnries. Obama is buying our own annihilation. we we stop buying oil from them, they will have noithing to build their nuclear arms with. on top of that, it could have cut gas prices here down around 25% or something incredible like that. He has also wracked up more debt than all of the other previous presodents combined...thats like what? 43? 44?

Canadian oil isn't enough to sustain us. The Middle East sits on top of the largest amount of oil in the world, of course we would buy it from them. Anyone in his position would know. We can't just stop buying our lifeblood fuel because they might use it for a weapon (assuming they have the technology to do so, seeing as how they don't even have an air force of any kind) or possibly improve their own lives. Is that really such a bad thing? We're already heading down, Obama isn't making it worse. He's trying to make it better. The problem is America is too shortsighted to see that we aren't helping others, we're dooming ourselves by not taking action within our own borders. Fix problems on the home front first, then move on to the international level. like debt. That debt level isn't his fault, it's the result of U.S. spending on the international scale over past years, and the inability of Congress to say "No more spending" when it's in their power to do so. We don't need a new president, we need more intelligent people in our country who see the real issue.

the reason why the plan was put into place was so that we could be more self sufcient. much of the oil would also comefrom our alaskan grounds which is actually very plentiful. I know we couldnt stop buying from the ME completley, but atleast we Iran. obama may be trying, but he is failing.

actually, canada has the most oil in the world by far, it's just stuck in the sands. the middle easts oil is just in pools underground and is extremely easy to take. in canada, the oil takes tons of resources and produces a lot of pollution to get, but there's a shit ton of it

I have taken Chemistry classes and researched these things. In reply to both of you, I would like to point out the the Middle East sits on about 62% of the planets oil supply, with a roughly 2-4% being in North America. The rest is scattered, the second largest quantity is near Venezuela, being at about 10% if I remember correctly.

actually, the reason that he refused the deal is because at the moment canada is not taking much oil from the tar sands in alberta. the reason is because if he agreed to the deal they would start extracting oil from the sands. the way they extract it is so bad that it takes 4 barrels of water to get 1 barrel of oil and it produces over 5 times as much co2 pollution as any other way of getting oil.

and so you would rather have everyone you know and love be obliterated in a nuclear war. all i can say is that I hope you enjoy the fallout games. also a majority of the oil was actually going to come from alaskan grounds as well which is another reason why it would be cheap

you act as if the world is really stupid enough to start a fucking nuclear war that would destroy everything. the leaders of each country aren't really that stupid, of course they have the weapons, but if they use them they'll just end up destroying the world and usually people don't want that

Really now? Yeah. A radical group of terroists are just building Nuclear wepons with death threats to america just for shits and giggles. Who gives a shit what people want? That has nothing to do with it. If Obama along with all the other european really asked the iranian leader to stop he would? no. he hates them nearly as much as he hates us. He would fire them at us then them. they arent building wepons as a present of good faith