Monday, October 17, 2016

ANTI-CAMPING ORDINANCE TALKING POINTS

On Monday, Oct. 17th Pasadena City Council will hear
the first reading on an ordinance on whether the police should arrest folks for
“camping” on city streets during the day, and if we should have permanent,
supportive housing in all parts of Pasadena.

Please review these taking points and write to your City Council member urging them to take appropriate action.

One Monday, Oct. 17th, the city attorney will
be defining “camping”--maintaining a camping facility or lodging. The issue is not simply about a person
sleeping or resting in public places but person + belongings. However, the
complexity of the issue is that most people sleeping in public do not have a
home to store their belongings, resulting in what would be considered camping. The
city will also consider having permanent supportive housing throughout the
city—housing that ends homelessness (a Housing First approach—by passing
shelters and transitional housing)

Causes
and Consequences of Criminalizing Behaviors Associated with Homelessness

2.There is
a direct correlation between the cuts in funding for affordable housing and the
rise of homelessness and anti-camping measures.

·HUD’s low- to moderate-income housing budget authority fell by 77 percent
between 1978 and 1983. Homelessness is primarily caused by a severe shortage of
affordable housing, exacerbated by an 85% reduction in federal funding for
affordable housing. Despite these cuts, two states and nineteen cities have now
ended homelessness for veterans. One of the few housing programs that has
not been cut is funding for permanent supportive housing. This can be access by
a city if there is land set aside to build this. Margaret McAustin is the first
to make sure this is built in her district. Marv’s place looks like a small
Mediterranean Villa. It just won an award as one of the best permanent
supportive housing in all of Southern California. We need this in very
district.

3.There has
been a significant rise in laws criminalizing homeless people in California,
but these laws have only worsened, not solved, the problem.

·UC BerkeleyLaw’s Policy Advocacy Clinic conducted an extensive study of
this problem in 2015 and concluded that “criminalization harms homeless people
and perpetuates poverty by restricting access to the social safety net,
affordable housing, and employment opportunities.” Since 2000, statewide
arrests for “vagrancy” offenses have increased by 77 percent, even as arrests
for “drunkenness” and “disorderly conduct” have decreased by 16 percent and 48
percent, respectively, suggesting that homeless people are being punished for
their status, not their behavior.http://www.homelesslivesmatterberkeley.org/pdf/CA_New_Vagrancy_Laws.pdf

4.Criminalization
measures do nothing to address the underlying causes of homelessness

5.Pasadena could lose HUD funding to
address homelessness if it is found to have
criminalized homeless people. In the
April 11, 2016, Bill Huang, Pasadena’s housing director was asked if this was
the case and he agreed.

6.The enforcement of anti-homeless laws is expensive,
directing limited resources away from efforts that would effectively and
humanely reduce homelessness.

·At the City Council meeting on April 11th, Tyron Hampton asked Police
Chief Philip Sanchez what would happen if someone was arrested for
camping/sleeping. He said that after making make arrests, then going to court,
and then to be checked out at Huntington Hospital, in the end they would be brought
back to the streets. The expensive cost to tax payers would be better spent on
permanent supportive housing for the homeless. Research shows that it
costs taxpayers approximately $40,000 a year for homeless people to stay on the street, and the cost to
house a homeless person about $20,000 a year. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/mar/12/shaun-donovan/hud-secretary-says-homeless-person-costs-taxpayers/7.

7.It could be cruel and unusual
punishment if homelessness is criminalized without providing sufficient indoor
places of shelter. In April when the City Council gave the directive to the City Attorney
to begin crafting this ordinance, the lawyer said that passing this new
ordinance could violate the Eighth Amendment. In 2006 the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals held a Los Angeles municipal law that prohibited
sitting, lying, or sleeping in public places violated homeless people’s Eighth
Amendment right to be free from “cruel and unusual punishment” since homeless people
need to sleep and rest and the city did not provide them with the means to do
so. This ruling called into question CA State Municipal Code 647 (e) which
states that “lodging in any building, structure, vehicle or place, whether
public of private, without the permission of the owner or person entitled to
the possession or control of it.” Municipalities that have tried to implement
this law could face law suits if they do so. Public funds created public walkways and the
public should have a right to use them if the is no other legal place to rest.

8.It is
immoral and against God’s laws to prevent someone from shelter and rest.Within
most religious teachings, including Christianity, believers are directed to
protect the rights of the poor and those without a home. “A righteous man knows
the rights of the poor; a wicked man does not understand such knowledge” (Proverbs 29:7).
“If your brother becomes poor and cannot maintain himself with you, you shall
support him as though he were a stranger and a sojourner, and he shall live
with you” (Leviticus 25:35-36 ) See https://www.openbible.info/topics/helping_the_homeless

9.It is against the UN International Declaration of
Human Rights to prevent sleeping which is a basic human need to survive.The US was a signatory of UN Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. This
Declaration is not legally binding but sets a moral standard by which nations
are judged and to which they are supposed to aspire. Article 25 states
that “everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health
and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing
and medical care and necessary social services.” In 1949, Congress enacted the
US Housing Act, which called for “a decent and suitable living environment for
every American family.” Our nation’s and our city’s aspirational goal is
to provide affordable housing for everyone, not criminalize those who can’t
afford housing. Seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_housing

Myths and Stereotypes about Homelessness

For
year’s cities and their residents have been dealing with how to respond to the
realities modern homelessness and poverty. We often labelled those without a
home as “the homeless” and as people who ask for money in public areas as
panhandlers. These two behaviors are
separate but are often cited together by cities addressing “The Homelessness
Issue”. Cities are often prompted to
respond in some manner, usually through criminalization measures, due to public
complaints, demands on law enforcement and legal departments, public health and
public safety concerns, which are at times perpetuated by stereotypes and improper
understanding of human relations.

10.Myth: People
who beg on the street make vast amounts of money. A Pasadenapolice
officer publicly stated that panhandlers make $200 an hour in Pasadena.

Reality: This is a rumor that has been passed around. If
true, this would make Pasadena the most generous city in California. In San
Francisco, a study showed that panhandlers average $25 per day. Regardless perceptions the community has of
persons who are asking for money, it is still right to free speech.

·Reason to ask for money in public is complex and
individual. Many do so in order to pay their rent or keep their
cars. Pasadena Police also stated publicly that some panhandlers have homes
(and even Mercedes!), thereby implying they didn’t need to beg for money. It is
true that some people who ask for money do live in cars, motels or shared
apartments, and panhandle to make rent payments, or to cover car expenses. If
they didn’t panhandle, many would end up destitute on the street. It should
also be noted that 45% of homeless people work part-time and 10% of students in
California’s higher education system are homeless at some point. http://www.lifeofthelaw.org/2014/06/the-right-to-beg/ and http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/09/AR2010070902357.html

11.Myth: “Homeless
people” are “service-resistant,” because they want to live on the streets. A police officer from Pasadena’s Hope Team stated
that 80% of homeless people are “service resistant” implying homeless folks prefer
living on the street.

Reality: t is true that there are people who do not want
to go to shelters, or be forced into treatment. Some prefer jail to a treatment
center. Many suffer from mental illness or substance use issues making them
wary of authorities. With time and trust
building on the part of HOPE team and Coordinated Entry System and Street
Outreach teams, many are now in housing. The reason why permanent Supportive
Housing is so effective is that it provides permanent housing first—bypassing
the shelters and transitional housing, thus ending homelessness. Folks can
enter housing, get stable and then work on their issues. One doctor who works
with homeless people said that he wishes he could write a prescription an
apartment and then renew it twelve times! Supportive housing doesn’t need to be
renewed.

·Pasadena has housed over 80 of the most chronically
homeless and Utah has housed 90% of its chronically homeless folk using the
Housing First model, which offers chronically homeless people a permanent,
affordable home with wrap-around services if they are desired. With the right
approach, the vast majority of homeless people are willing and able to be
housed and many will seek treatment voluntarily when they are ready. http://www.npr.org/2015/12/10/459100751/utah-reduced-chronic-homelessness-by-91-percent-heres-how

12.Myth: Recent changes to State Laws have seen the
release of large numbers of former inmates from jails, and most end up
homeless, leading to an increase in crime.

Reality: Thanks to Prop 57, and requirements by the Supreme
Court to reduce prison crowding, California has dramatically lowered
incarceration—by about 55,000 inmates since 2006—with no broad increase in
crime.

Reality:
Existing laws and codes
that address these behaviors. Pasadena police do not need “new tools,” i.e.
more stringent laws, to protect the public from aggressive panhandlers and
camping. These current laws already provide
ample protection to businesses and property owners:

a.If anyone leaves something (e.g. a tent or sleeping
bag) on someone else’s private property, the owner can toss it in the trash or
sell it as abandoned property. If
someone leaves their property on a publicly owned site, according to Officer
Domino Scott-Jackson, police have a right to evict people from a public place
using a 72 hour notice and at hour 73, their belongings can then be removed.
Items must be kept in storage for 30 days. If they aren’t claimed, they can be
disposed of.\

b.Property owners have a right to put up a No
Trespassing sign on their property. If someone goes on their property without
permission to do so, they can call the police and the police on request of the
owner can arrest the person for trespassing under Penal Code (PC) 602(o)(2).

c.A
business owner can file a “Trespass Enforcement Authorization Letter” with the
police department that allows officers to make arrests of those individuals who
are on the property afterhours. If that letter were not on file, the officers
could not request the individuals to leave or make any arrests. They would have
to contact the owners every single time they find people at the property to
investigate whether or not the person has permission from the owner to be
there.

e.A person in possession of a shopping cart (with an
identified business) could face a violation of PMC9.62.070 and PC485.

f.Businesses
and churches that are open to the public have the right to ask folks to leave
under PC602(o)(2). When the owner asks someone to leave and they refuse, they
can be arrested.

g.Currently, it’s not illegal to pan-handle in
Pasadena, as long as you are not blocking the driveway, impeding traffic or
standing in the street (See Vehicle Code 22520.5(a) – infraction). But
threatening behavior by a panhandler can be considered “accosting,” a crime
according to California Penal Code Section 647.

h.If someone feels harassed by a pan handler, a
citizen’s arrest can be made, showing that the panhandler intends to do
something illegal, under code PC647(c), which addresses aggressive
panhandling.

About Anthony Manousos

I am a Quaker peace activist, teacher and author, my most recent book being "Transformative Quakers" and "Howard and Anna Brinton: Reinventors of Quakerism in the 20th century." I serve on the board of directors for several organizations, including the Friends World Committee for Consultation and Interfaith Communities United for Justice and Peace. I love biking, hiking in the mountains, going to museums and art galleries, Classical music, jazz, and being with friends. For twelve years I edited a Quaker magazine called "Friends Bulletin" (now called "The Western Friend") and edited four books and wrote several pamphlets for Quakers. I have taught at numerous colleges and universities, including Carleton College, Rutgers, Pepperdine, UC San Bernardino, San Bernardino Valley College, etc. I am a certified spiritual director through a spiritual direction program called "Stilpoint." I reside in Pasadena with wife Jill Shook, who has published a book on affordable housing (makinghousinghappen.com). We have a lovely garden, citrus and fig trees, a grape arbor, cats named Miss Rosie and Dr. Pepper, and three Arucana chickens.