On 26/09/2013, at 10:05 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 26.09.2013 10:59, Justin Clift wrote:
>> On 26/09/2013, at 6:30 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> I will probably make rc2 during the w.e. and depending on news push on
>>> Tuesday next week or a bit later the final 1.1.3
>>
>> Compiles ok on MacOS 10.7. virsh starts ok too.
>>
>> One weirdness noted from inside virsh (not connected to a
>> hypervisor):
>>
>> virsh # version
>> error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
>> error: no valid connection
>> error: Failed to find user record for uid '32766'
>>
>> Not sure what the "32766" comes from, since that's not the id of
>> my user:
>
> Isn't it a PID of the virsh process? I think we fail to get identity for
> the virsh process and mislead users by wrong error message.
Doesn't seem like it. Just started virsh again, but the pid of that
process doesn't match the # given this time (which did change though).
Terminal window 1:
virsh # version
error: failed to connect to the hypervisor
error: no valid connection
error: Failed to find user record for uid '32706'
Terminal window 2: (virsh still open in #1)
$ ps -ef|grep -i virsh
501 35262 35252 0 10:38am ttys000 0:00.03 virsh
$ ps -ef|grep -i 32706
$
Not seeing anything in the "327xx" range, and new pid's
are (atm) in the "353xx" range.
Not sure where it's picking up the "uid" value from, and haven't
really tried tracing it. I wonder if it's just an OSX thing, or
if maybe *BSD is showing something similar...
+ Justin
--
Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
twitter.com/realjustinclift