Extremely lengthy. Reminds me of a man trying to inflate possibilities and mix them with reality. Tests and reality are two different things. You can calculate all you want but execution is key. IF it was so easy to attack it would be attacked. If it was comparable to eth it would never have gained such traction. The fact that they brought other blockchains into the picture and directly compared makes it biased as well. You can criticize something without bringing other brands into the picture. It was a attempt to say Eos is not as good as Ethereum because point abc instead of i find issues in eos for point abc

Completely biased and defended to death already in the other 50 post about the same report. The only reason to post such an antagonist old article is to create FUD. So please, go away and play somewhere else.

Wow that's a lot of effort to try and convince people ETH can scale like EOS can. Lol give me a break Vitalik has already made his comments as to why EOS can scale and why he's against that. You can't just bend research to try and now say it can't even scale past ETH. Get real!

"A number of different people from various organization assisted in this research. We would like to thank Daniel Choi and Trey Zhong from the Whiteblock team; Shahan Khatchadourian, Ben Edgington, and Nicolos Lioshon from the PegaSys team at Consensys; Wayne Chang, Grec Rocco, and Steve Gattuso from the Alpine team at ConsenSys; and Antione Toulme from the ConsenSys Core Engineering team".

Again the same shit paid by Consensys which claims that EOS can only reach 250 TPS in optimal lab conditions, when it already reached 4000 TPS in real usage. That not only shows how poor they research methods are but that they didn't even bother to look for real EOS mainnet data.

Since Dan and these researchers both appear biased, why don’t both of these parties definitively put this issue to rest by releasing a benchmark script so we can replicate the experiments over AWS? Reproducibility is key here given how much paid shilling/fudding is in this space. Token holders need to collectively demand these verification of important claims. Some of us, like Bitmex research, could in theory verify everything ourselves but block.one should release their experimental code and procedures for full transparency.

Get off reddit and you'll see EOS is all over crypto news. Here's a nice developments [https://cryptomenow.com/mythical-games-raises-16m-series-a-to-build-games-on-eos/](https://cryptomenow.com/mythical-games-raises-16m-series-a-to-build-games-on-eos/)
&#x200B;
There's a twitter link around somewhere. You'll find that just because you haven't heard about something doesn't mean it's not actually happening.

This is Ethereum interest groups payed analysis against competition.
There is one more metric and that is user experience and I think EOS is doing pretty well there. User experience like Meet.One wallet with application store integrated into I haven’t seen in any other blockchain so far.