Anarcho-Tyranny And The Logistical Class

Anarcho-Tyranny And The Logistical Class

Anarcho-Tyranny And The Logistical Class

November 6, 2016Admin

I was introduced to the term ‘Anarcho-Tyranny’ by a very knowledgeable reader of this website named Nxx. The term is a perfect description of modern Europe, and the situation its native citizens find themselves in.

The term originated with the late conservative thinker Samuel Francis, who gave the definition as this (talking at the time about the United States):

What we have in this country today, then, is both anarchy (the failure of the state to enforce the laws) and, at the same time, tyranny – the enforcement of laws by the state for oppressive purposes; the criminalization of the law-abiding and innocent through exorbitant taxation, bureaucratic regulation, the invasion of privacy, and the engineering of social institutions, such as the family and local schools; the imposition of thought control through “sensitivity training” and multiculturalist curricula, “hate crime” laws, gun-control laws that punish or disarm otherwise law-abiding citizens but have no impact on violent criminals who get guns illegally, and a vast labyrinth of other measures. In a word, anarcho-tyranny.

Francis was describing America, but I know not whether he had an inkling that Europe would soon far surpass the conditions in the US which prompted his words. Because in fact, the ‘anarcho-tyranny’ on display today in Europe is of a nature far more horrendous.

In this environment of ‘Anarcho-Tyranny’ that the governments of Western Europe are currently propagating, the lives of regular native citizens are unduly controlled and pre-empted by excessive government intrusion and censorship, while they at the same time are made victims of the vast criminality and violence of Muslim immigrants, which is allowed and even facilitated by their own governments, through both a lack of criminal prosecution and penalty, and through the under-funding and non-support of law enforcement.

A Portrait Of Anarcho-Tyranny In Western Europe:

In the most classic and sickening examples, we have the massive Muslim-perpetrated rape of European women and children. In Sweden, which now has the second highest per capita rape rate on earth, 2015 saw sexual assaults and rapes achieve levels one would associate only with the worst third world war-zones. Extrapolating from neighboring Norway, we can assume Muslims accounted for the same 99% of perpetrators, and native women accounted for 99% of the victims. Click here for some analysis and a link to the original statistics.

In Belgium, an Iranian immigrant who raped a 15 year old native Belgian girl, choked her so badly that she was left with neck injuries, and threatened to kill her if she screamed, was let off without jail time at his trial. Link: http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/726392/Iranian-migrant-spared-jail-rape-girl-15-sex-attack-Belgium

In Germany, as Breitbart reports, “A police officer in the German city of Rheinberg is under fire after it was revealed that she encouraged a young girl not to report the fact she had been sexually assaulted by a migrant.” Here is the story: www.breitbart.com/london/2016/11/02/police-prevent-girl-report-sexual-assault-migrant/

And, and in a currently-famous example that Vladimir Putin just spoke on, an Iraqi migrant who anally-raped a 10 year-old Austrian boy at a swimming pool so badly the boy had to spend time in the hospital, was let off by an upper-court in Austria that ruled the perpetrator should do no jail time because he and the victim “spoke different languages”, and because “the lower court did not adequately prove that the boy was saying ‘no'”. The implication being, of course, that the ten year old Austrian boy actually wanted to be anally-raped so badly he would be hospitalized.

Putin discusses the Austrian government’s release of an immigrant child-rapist without jail time.

Such examples are not even 1% of 1% of those that could be mentioned, (for more, check out this book we reviewed), yet the governments are guilty not just of allowing such horrific criminality in individual cases, but of fostering it through lack of funding and support for law enforcement. We see the results every day in the mass anarchy now on display.

For example, Sweden spends billions upon billions per year ensuring mass immigration continues, and giving food, housing, education, and spending money to the millions of migrants they have allowed in, yet their law enforcement personnel are left without enough staff and resources to conduct even basic law enforcement. For instance, right now police in Skåne are now no longer able to investigate homicides because of a lack of time and personnel. Immigrant-gang related murders have overwhelmed the police to such an extent that, according to this article, murders now routinely go un-investigated. Link: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.friatider.se%2Fpolisen-har-slut-pa-mordutredare&edit-text=&act=url

Similarly, in France this week, immigrant crime also reached a crescendo. As The New Observer Online reports, immigrants “rampaged through the streets of Paris in a mass brawl between Afghans, Eritreans, and sub-Saharan Africans near the Stalingrad Metro station where they have been camping out for the past several weeks.” The article further explained that the immigrants “attacked each other with sticks and other makeshift weapons in the hours-long battle, much to the horror of local businesses and residents.” Link: http://newobserveronline.com/invader-rampage-paris/

At the same time such government-facilitated horrors are occurring, those same governments use heavy handed and authoritarian tactics to enforce their multicultural program, and punish native citizens who stand in their way. Native citizens are both victimized by Muslim criminality and violence, and by the authoritarianism of their own governments. This ranges from a zero tolerance approach to crimes committed by native citizens, to the outright targeted harassment of ones with dissenting opinions. The examples abound.

-Two Polish immigrants who- in a bit of juvenile mischief- threw bacon at a London Mosque, received heavy jail sentences from the UK Court that tried them. Link: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/11/02/polish-migrants-jailed-throwing-bacon-london-mosque/

The two Polish men who were incarcerated.

-In Sweden, as we previously reported, a man was arrested for typing out the word ‘negro’ online (see story here).

-In Germany, government-sponsored ‘Anti-fascists’ (Antifa) targeted a dentist who had been illegally exposed as supporting the opposition right-wing AfD party with violence, harassment, and the attempted ruin of his dental practice (link here).

-In Denmark, a teenage girl was attacked by a Muslim immigrant who tackled her, began sexually assaulting her, and started taking off her pants to rape her. She fought back, and used a can of pepper spray she kept on her person against him, narrowly escaping the attack. In the aftermath she was told that she faced prosecution, as pepper spray is illegal in Denmark. Link: https://www.rt.com/news/330264-denmark-girl-rapist-fine/

-The German government just announced it is prosecuting Mark Zuckerberg- Facebook owner and CEO- and several of his top executives for ‘inciting hatred’. The German prosecutors allege that Facebook was ‘too slow’ in removing ‘offensive posts’ regarding mass-immigration and holocaust denial. Basically the German government is prosecuting them in an aggressive attempt to bully Facebook into censoring user’s free speech to an even greater extent. This is ironic, since Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook are radically left-wing and pro-multiculturalism anyway, and have already been accused of censoring right-wing groups and postings in the United States. As a result, the story is a strong example of just how desperately the Germans are attempting to limit dissent at this point. Link to story: http://m.dw.com/en/munich-court-to-try-facebooks-zuckerberg-for-inciting-hatred/a-36269828

French police protested in 60 cities.

What Next?

We (or at least I) are wont to see such things and view all of those within the state apparatus’ as being part of the problem, yet the recent police protests in France suggest that this is not the case, and that those in law enforcement are less than happy about implementing such government programs, given their horrific results.

While protesting is obviously a big part of the culture in France, apparently such police protests are somewhat unprecedented, and as a result potential confirmation that things have reached a breaking point.

Police officers gave interviews to local broadcasters LCI and BFMTV, in which they said the protests had been organised spontaneously, without official backing from the unions.

Those demonstrating say they are tired of being attacked and are under-resourced, particularly when it comes to tackling criminal gangs. They also say that they don’t have the necessary means to combat the threat of further terrorist attacks and are regularly made to work overtime.

In a word, they’re frustrated.

Alternative police-CFDT union representative Denis Jacob told jihadwatch.org there are ‘no-go’ zones, where police officers are not able to safely do their jobs, despite what the government may say.

“Of course, there are no-go zones in France where the police cannot intervene and do their jobs in safety. And it’s the same for fire fighters or pretty much any representative of the state.

“The police can’t apply the law in these areas, they are attacked. If the police can’t do their work, it’s because there are criminals and delinquents who don’t respect the law.

“It’s not just a problem with this government. It’s a problem with all French governments over the last 20 years. Governments will never admit there are no-go zones because it’s a sign of a failed state…”

When these protests first started, some within our ranks express hope that they would turn into a police coup.

Euronews mentions a somewhat-similar possibility, in terms of the protests’ relevance in the coming French presidential election, and the possibility of the right ‘hijacking’ the French government:

A further, possibly unintended consequence of the unauthorised rallies is also conceivable. With the 2017 presidential election looming, the protests could play into the hands of far-right groups and parties such as Marine Le Pen’s Front National. Topics such as national security are high on the agenda of the far-right and the demos could be politically exploited to highlight perceived tensions among forces of law and order and the potentially negative consequences for French security.

Members of the ‘immigrant community’ attacked policemen and their vehicles at some of the protests.

This potential link between ‘the logistical class’ (the police in this instance) and the threat (to the establishment at least) of right-wing ‘revolution’ is actually somewhat evocative of the situation in the United States right now as well. For Donald Trump beating Hillary Clinton is as horrible a prospect (or more so) to the Progressive-elites as Marine le Pen beating Francoise Hollande would be. Yet Trump’s chances are built on a similar platform, in which the desire for law and order amidst very visible disorder (riots in Baltimore, terrorism, illegal immigration) has coalesced large swaths of the electorate. Indeed one could argue that Trump’s greater-than-normal support among Whites without college degrees, and Blacks with them, is a representation of the same ‘logistical class’ frustration that these French police protests are. (Note: I am assuming Whites that do have college degrees are more likely to be part of the ‘intellectual elite’ than what I am calling the ‘logistical class’, although if you are just talking about a Bachelor’s Degree one could probably make that case).

By ‘Logistical Class’, I am basically referring to those people within Western societies who are not among the poor, non-working, government-supported underclass, and also not among the effeminate, overly-educated cosmopolitan elite (what the same Sam Francis called the “Managerial Class”). They may be policemen, plumbers, jailers, store managers, small business owners, etc. They are- quite literally- the ones that keep the logistics of Western Civilization moving.

I would not deem them the same as as ‘Silent Majority’ necessarily, for I think they are defined more by an apolitical nature than a conservative one. They are also not poor enough to be the natural victims of the immigrant underclass (like the children in Rotherham or the widow in Enoch Powell’s famous speech), but neither are they wealthy enough to flee to homogeneous enclaves where diversity is hypocritically celebrated despite everyone having moved there to avoid it. They are also not us (me and most of the readers of this site), who have read countless books and are passionate about history, society, politics, philosophy, etc. Instead they are those content to stay out of such arenas and to keep their heads low- at least until the point at which they have no choice.

That point is rapidly approaching of course, and it brings us to our last example of ‘Logistical Class’ rebellion, in East Germany,- an area we have studied before. There, the city of Bautzen has been seeing running battles between young immigrants and local Germans. The left-wing establishment German press, along with Western tabloids hungry to sell copies- have consistently attempted to turn these incidents into stories of “far-right Neo-Nazi’s” victimizing poor migrants and “hunting them down” in the streets.

We see such an example in the following headline:

A MOB of up to 50 stone-throwing neo-Nazis went “hunting” for migrants in the eastern German city of Bautzen yesterday in a repeat of scenes which played out there two months ago.

The German press of course labels anyone who opposes mass-immigration a ‘Neo-Nazi’, but the coverage of these immigrant vs. native German brawls in East Germany may take on additional importance in the establishment’s mind because they worry that the police in such regions sympathize too much with groups like Pegida and the AfD party.

The police in Saxony have been involved in several controversial episodes over recent months, as critics have accused them of being too close to far-right movements.

In March Saxony’s own deputy minister-president said “I ask myself if sympathies for Pegida and the AfD [Alternative for Germany] are more widespread in the police than among normal citizens.”

At Unity Day celebrations in Dresden at the start of October, a police officer wished demonstrators for the xenophobic Pegida movement “a successful day”, leading to accusations of implicit support.

Purported video of migrant vs native brawl in East Germany.

Furthermore, actual research into all these events in Bautzen suggests that the circumstances of these incidents were actually much different.

Regarding the first incident in Bautzen a couple months ago, one of our loyal readers- Michael, who is a German currently living in the United States- was able to do research on various local and non-establishment websites to get an accurate summation of events, and relayed them as follows:

This conflict has been brewing in Bautzen for a while. The public square is a hangout for immigrants because of the availability of a free Wifi signal which is a magnet for such people. And where there is a crowd of immigrants, there are problems with theft, assaults and unruly behavior. The manager of a local hotel as well as several business owners in the vicinity of the square had been filing complaints to the local mayor and the police, asking for proactive measures to control the situation. According to the hotel manager, his guest did not feel safe to leave the hotel for an evening stroll due to immigrants acting aggressively and attacking people. Finally the locals have had enough and organized a resistance which eventually led to the brawl that happened yesterday. Now there is an outcry across the liberal media landscape all across Germany, you can hear journalists howl “Nazis, extremists and xenophobia”. But the regular people on the street who have to deal with the reality of immigration issues every day know better…

This certainly better matches my experiences in Germany/Western Europe, and those of everyone else I know who lives there or has visited there: young teenage and twenty-something immigrants loitering around squares and train and subway stations, hassling commuters and tourists, giving off a vibe of aggression if not engaging in outright hostility, and attempting to start fights or commit petty crimes, etc.

I have never seen nor heard of, nor spoken with anyone who has seen or heard of, violent “Neo-Nazi’s” running around “hunting immigrants”.

Therefore I think we must attribute these brawls in Bautzen to the same thing- regular middle-class Germans- the ‘logistical class’- getting sick of non-stop immigrant harassment and finally fighting back.

If that is the case, then we can hope that as Western European countries continue to march toward ‘failed state’ status, the ‘logistical class’ will grow more and more restless, and realize it is time to act.

Editor’s Note: As always, if you are in Europe or have traveled there recently and can provide any on the ground accounts, perspectives, or anything else helpful to this website, please contact at valhalla1@europeancivilwar.com. All emails and all comments are highly appreciated!

Comments (6)

It’s interesting to see Francis’s predictions and theories bear fruit in real life. Incidentally, I met the man in London in the late ’90s.

If it continues, and if the security forces do not crack down on perpetrators, there will be a Nationalist vigilante reaction–the likes of which I can’t go into here on this website. But I think you know what I’m referring to.

That is extremely cool. I did not know much about the man until recently, but have been exposed to him through CC and various other sites. I have always been a big Pat Buchanan fan and Francis seems to just sort of be Buchanan on steroids so to speak 🙂

I certainly hope what you are referring to comes to fruition. Today’s results here in the US will be extremely propitious as regards the future on both sides of the Atlantic I believe. I think either outcome will be positive- if Trump wins that is good for the US for obvious reasons, and should embolden nationalists in Europe. If the Hildebeest wins, that should galvanize resistance in America and launch Identitarian right-wingism even further to ascendance as the new counterculture. I think that switch of the counterculture to the right has been huge and is the biggest story of the whole election cycle, will be writing on this soon. So yeah and then if Hillary wins I think that will also have positive effects METApolitically in Europe, even if from a purely logistical point of view it will provide support for suicidalists like Merkel. Either way I think that which you are referring to will still catalyze (in Europe specifically), just in slightly different ways.

It takes a strong stomach and courage to have open eyes and to wonder how to survive the bloated evil state and it’s global owners. I am thinking of the vile wannabe empress Barbara specter. On a bright note (sarc) the latest Australian of the Year was awarded to an African refugee.