The article also speaks to needing to beg, borrow, and steal resources when taking on the role of CISO. I propose in many instances this constraint is largely self imposed as a direct result of not appropriately managing expectations and building the required trusting relationships at the beginning. Furthermore, do we really want to position the CISO as a professional scapegoat? Or does it make more sense to position the CISO as someone with the professional integrity and intestinal fortitude needed to hold their ground while leveraging soft skills for effectively building and managing a balanced security program?

@ODA155, I completely understand. Thank you for the advice. I am currently studying for my CISA to add it to my credentials. There's no end point to me studying. I continuously try to plug myself into different things in my profession for the exposure and experience. I'm looking to do all I can to have a wholly understanding of information security. Just for the benefit of being able to talk the talk of security to a wide range of business professionals. Becoming a C level executive is end my goal, me learning is a forever journey. Thanks again for the advice. Another thing to think about to help me through these tough studying times. Good thing I live in Chicago and it's almost winter. The temperature here is bound to keep me in the house with nothing to do but study.

@ekwisca, Why is it "the end goal"... may I also recommend getting your CISA. In my opinion, the second most helpful trait of a successful security professional after a very good technical foundation is understanding IT audit, its language, the people who conduct them and navigating and using the audit report to you advantage. What you'll find, especially in smaller organizations is that you, the security pro will most likely be standing between management, admin\tech and auditors, juggling everyones needs and requirements against your own. And that is where the third most useful trait comes in... effective communication skills.

I couldn't be more excited about this new series of articles on becoming a CISO. As a young professional in the security world, the CISO position is my end goal. Currently holding my CISSP and CCNA I hope I am on the right track for learning business as well as the technical side of the IT World. Looking forward to next Monday.

@ArthurK439 I agree with this: Information protection is crucial to the operations and success of the business, and to have it subordiante to a role that is primarily operational is a recipe for disaster. But I also just spoke to a CISO who reports to a CIO, and he said that it isn't a problem with this CIO, because they understand and respect security. I wonder if, ultimately, it all depends upon the specific people, not their titles or organizational structure.

The issue is the varying interpretations of what comprises someone that is "technical". For some, it's a candidate that can conceptually walk through technical subjects and enumerate the relevant risks. For others, it's someone that can furnish a detailed explanation of the end-to-end packet delivery process and enumerate the attack vectors along that path. I tend to favor those with a more robust command of security as a discipline, as they can make informed decisions. They are otherwise reliant upon delegation, which isn't the best strategy during times of crisis...

I think we have seen the risks where having the CISO reporting to the CIO (Target comes to mind). As long as the CISO is viewed as being IT centric, and not about risk management, there will be an inclination to pidgeonhole it in the former category. At a minimum, it should be reporting to the CFO, and ideally to the CEO. Information protection is crucial to the operations and success of the business, and to have it subordiante to a role that is primarily operational is a recipe for disaster.

As for certifications, having a CISSP as a requirement to being a CISO is not mandatory. That being said, there are significant benefits in possessing it. Primarily, it ensures a common baseline, standardization of knowledge and common language. Secondly, it (and complimentary certifications such as the CISM, CISA and CRISC) is as close as currently we have as profesional designations. Both the ISC2 and ISACA have an ethics requirement, and with privacy and information being so tightly coupled these days, ethical and professional conduct considerations are crucial for a business leader. Just as I woul expect the CFO to be a CPA/CA, a Chief Counsel being a lawyer/JD, I would expect a CISO to be a CISSP/CISM/CISA/CRISC.

The fact is, the CISO role is hibrid in nature, requring both business acumen, technical knowledge, legal/regulatory, etc. Although I do not expect a CISO to configure a firewall, they should understand what it provides as a security control, after all.

Regarding certificates, I think that they do more than demonstrate competence. After getting two certs myself I found them invaluable in separating the security 'fact' from 'fiction.' Any good skill set requires an understanding of a foundations and I believe that the CISSP achieves that requirement. I would agree with the 'no-cert' requirement if you can independently verify your skill set if you served in the military or law enforcement.

As for reporting to the CIO, the only logical reason I would agree is if you're the CISO of a data center. I would be wary if the CISO reported to the CIO either in a regulated business such as health or financial. Implementing the separation of duties concept in reasonable scenarios is the preferred method in a regulated environment.

@Marilyn Cohodas, I can say after having a number of discussions with HR personell in different industries that is a primary reason for it.

I do not advocate certifications for certification sake, and I do understand how they are one measure of demonstrating competence prior to obtaining the position. I used to be one of those who said "if they give me half a chance, I can prove that I can do that", but as time has gone on, I began to understand the position of "I need something to base this chance on other than the person says they can do it". The certification is an independent mile marker that the person has at least put in the time and effort to learn that much about that subject(s).

Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.

It was found that dropbear before version 2013.59 with GSSAPI leaks whether given username is valid or invalid. When an invalid username is given, the GSSAPI authentication failure was incorrectly counted towards the maximum allowed number of password attempts.

** DISPUTED ** In PCRE 8.41, after compiling, a pcretest load test PoC produces a crash overflow in the function match() in pcre_exec.c because of a self-recursive call. NOTE: third parties dispute the relevance of this report, noting that there are options that can be used to limit the amount of st...

** DISPUTED ** LibTIFF 4.0.8 has multiple memory leak vulnerabilities, which allow attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption), as demonstrated by tif_open.c, tif_lzw.c, and tif_aux.c. NOTE: Third parties were unable to reproduce the issue.