(Cat? OR feline) AND NOT dog?
Cat? W/5 behavior
(Cat? OR feline) AND traits
Cat AND charact*

This guide provides a more detailed description of the syntax that is supported along with examples.

This search box also supports the look-up of an IP.com Digital Signature (also referred to as Fingerprint); enter the 72-, 48-, or 32-character code to retrieve details of the associated file or submission.

Concept Search - What can I type?

For a concept search, you can enter phrases, sentences, or full paragraphs in English. For example, copy and paste the abstract of a patent application or paragraphs from an article.

Concept search eliminates the need for complex Boolean syntax to inform retrieval. Our Semantic Gist engine uses advanced cognitive semantic analysis to extract the meaning of data. This reduces the chances of missing valuable information, that may result from traditional keyword searching.

System for use case panel analysis

Publishing Venue

IBM

Abstract

Currently, there is no way for architects, information developers, product managers, etc. to see the big picture as to how the use cases and key scenarios designated for a particular product have been designed. A system is disclosed here where UI designers create their panels and provide some sort of identifier per use case panel. Other developers can then request data on the particular use cases and retrieve information around the visuals for the panels, how many panels, panel changes, terminology, and so on. Further comparisons are then possible for the analysis between one or more uses cases, where reuse of panels, number of panels, can also provide very helpful information. This capability might play well in the agile environment.

Country

Undisclosed

Language

English (United States)

This text was extracted from a PDF file.

At least one non-text object (such as an image or picture) has been suppressed.

This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately
54% of the total text.

Page 1 of 4

System for use case panel analysis

Currently, there is no way for architects, information developers, product managers, etc. to see the big picture as to how the use cases and key scenarios designated for a particular product have been designed. There is value in being able to determine how many panels are associated with a particular use case at one time and to looking at one particular use case from beginning to end and comparing it from a consistency, efficiency, and concreteness perspective.

Likewise, there is no easy way, if at all, to compare more than one use case to another for any redundancies, inefficiencies, inconsistencies etc.

As resources continue to be constrained, aggressively pursuing a minimalism approach to designing and describing the way to get work done with our products is critical. Being able to visualize and view the big picture to see how the key use cases and scenarios are being addressed provides development contributors and stake holders with a much easier way to efficiently and effectively view and work on a product.

Figure 1 represents an example summary view of the results of this tool.

Figure 1

The user can see at a glance:

List of the use cases included in the project (or being evaluated) A high level complexity rating (user configurable)

1

[This page contains 1 picture or other non-text object]

Page 2 of 4

The total number of panels included in the use case

A description of the target use case (to help determine the appropriateness of the complexity level)

Additional fields can easily be included

Figure 2 provides an example of a comparison feature .

Figure 2

In this view the user can see:

A list of the use cases that have been evaluated

A high-level, graphical or iconic view of the number of panels The numeric total of the number of panelsA descriptionThe ability to select tw...