1 Hutson Led Pack to 3 World Championships. Until Jerry Rice, was the greatest receiver in NFL history.
2 Graham Won 3NFL/World Championships with the Browns.
3 YA Tittle Would have a couple World Titles if not for Lombardi’s Packers.
4 Ken Anderson If he played for Pittsburgh they would have won 6 NFL titles. Egregious omission for the HOF for 2 decades now.
5 Fouts
6 Brad Johnson

Why can’t I vote for Otto, Don Hudson and Y.A. Tittle!!
One to the 5 best players ever is gonna be eliminated :(

]]>By: steelerfan9598http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408326
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:35:49 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408326What, no Neil O’Donnell?
]]>By: rob5311http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408300
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:24:51 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408300Dan Fouts
]]>By: lennymooreruleshttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408299
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:22:28 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408299I agree with some commenters that Hutson and Graham should be one and two. Hutson averaged 68,5 yards per game plus he scored 99 td’s in 116 games during a time when teams ran first and defensive backs could hit a receiver until the ball was in the air. Other than Jerry Rice he was the greatest receiver in pro football.
]]>By: trollaikman8http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408291
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 07:28:49 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408291Vinny Testaverde entered the NFL as #14.
]]>By: peed1http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408263
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 04:50:02 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408263YA Title is the best #14.
]]>By: mysterytonitehttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408215
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 03:14:12 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408215Ken Anderson was better than Dan Foutes. He put up better numbers but was a loser and never won anything. Anderson at least was got to a bowl while playing in a cold weather city in a tough division. Should no doubt be a hof’er if that bozo Foutes is in.
]]>By: golforeparhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408213
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 03:12:45 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408213Hutson is a NFL legend!
‘NUFF SAID!!
]]>By: daltonsdumptruckhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408210
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 03:09:32 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408210Fitzmagic
]]>By: granadafanhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408163
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 02:17:20 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408163Glorious, this is straight up embarrassing that you don’t know what a prime number means. You’ve den this several times now
]]>By: Aaron Rodgers Has Tiny Handshttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408158
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 02:13:13 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408158Every article on this prime numbers series has had multiple commenters saying “those aren’t prime numbers.” Is it really that hard to get? Please put a disclaimer in the headline (since nobody reads the stories) of all future stories indicating that “prime numbers” is a play on words and doesn’t refer literally to prime numbers.
]]>By: phillyphannnn83http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408152
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 02:05:12 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-340815214? 9? Not prime numbers.
]]>By: phillyphannnn83http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408150
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 02:04:29 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408150I thought a prime number was a number only divisible by itself and 1???
]]>By: kamthechancellorhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408134
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 01:45:55 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408134Fouts was a baller. Not the greatest play by play broadcaster, but he could put up 400 yds like nothing. That’s during a time when you could massacre a qb and interfere with receivers at will.
]]>By: raiderapologisthttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408054
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 00:28:03 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408054Hutson retired in 1945, and still holds many NFL receiving records. He was an incredibly successful receiver in an era when the passing game wasn’t relevant, and receivers weren’t even called receivers. If I’m agreeing with slick50ks, there’s a damn good reason.
]]>By: bobnelsonjrhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3408038
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 00:14:38 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3408038Don Hutson still holds the record for the most points scored in one quarter, 29.

Don got 99 TDs in an era when pass interference was legal.

When Don Hutson’s career was complete had a stat line more than double of the next guy on the all time list.

Leather helmet, no face mask, and far fewer rules, he played in a much rougher and tougher NFL that had only 12 games a season yet turned in modern softer NFL type numbers.

He was absolutely dominant. Even if someone can’t see his video, look up the stats. He would consistently double or triple the second best receiver in the league when he played.

Otto Graham was ridiculous too…

]]>By: militantgodhttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3407989
Sun, 08 Jun 2014 23:32:52 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3407989Hutson in 4th is laughable. Graham ahead of him? Cool. Ken Anderson? Hahahahahaha.
]]>By: greenisgold1265http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3407921
Sun, 08 Jun 2014 22:35:36 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3407921If you didn’t vote for Don Hutson, you don’t know football.
]]>By: x716199121http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/08/prime-numbers-series-considers-no-14-on-tuesday/#comment-3407895
Sun, 08 Jun 2014 22:14:05 +0000http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=2263772#comment-3407895Where can one view enough footage of a guy like Don Hutson to be able to determine that he was the best ever? The guy played his last game almost 70 years ago and the first NFL game was televised 5 years into his 11 year career.