^The two are not directly related. A nova is the explosion of a star. It does not automatically turn into a black hole. A black hole requires a great amount of mass. Perhaps a nova would slowly aquire enough mass as it attracts other objects, but as it occurs it does not on it's own lead to a black hole.

^The two are not directly related. A nova is the explosion of a star. It does not automatically turn into a black hole. A black hole requires a great amount of mass. Perhaps a nova would slowly aquire enough mass as it attracts other objects, but as it occurs it does not on it's own lead to a black hole.

[quote user="Nova999"]^The two are not directly related. A nova is the explosion of a star. It does not automatically turn into a black hole. A black hole requires a great amount of mass. Perhaps a nova would slowly aquire enough mass as it attracts other objects, but as it occurs it does not on it's own lead to a black hole. [/quote]

Some times it does, some times it doesn't.

http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic0211.html

Nova999 wrote:

^The two are not directly related. A nova is the explosion of a star. It does not automatically turn into a black hole. A black hole requires a great amount of mass. Perhaps a nova would slowly aquire enough mass as it attracts other objects, but as it occurs it does not on it's own lead to a black hole.

[quote user="TheFoeYouKnow"]And all those religious nutters claim we are the only life in all of existence. If you ask me (and my opinion is as worthless as any of yours) THAT is a statistical impossibility.

[/quote]

Dude, our opinions shape the fucking universe, what you said only applies to nova and mmateri.

TheFoeYouKnow wrote:

And all those religious nutters claim we are the only life in all of existence. If you ask me (and my opinion is as worthless as any of yours) THAT is a statistical impossibility.

Dude, our opinions shape the fucking universe, what you said only applies to nova and mmateri.

Dude, our opinions shape the fucking universe, what you said only applies to nova and mmateri.

[/quote]

no dude, the universe shapes our opinion. if your opinion is shaping the universe you need to either a) put down the LSD for a bit or b) listen more to the voices in your head that are telling you to kill Wolffe with his own BB guns and post the videos to TAN

JudgeThreeWayDisciple wrote:

TheFoeYouKnow wrote:

Dude, our opinions shape the fucking universe, what you said only applies to nova and mmateri.

no dude, the universe shapes our opinion. if your opinion is shaping the universe you need to either a) put down the LSD for a bit or b) listen more to the voices in your head that are telling you to kill Wolffe with his own BB guns and post the videos to TAN

Honestly, imagine that God only created one intelligent race. Just one, and for the sake of argument, lets assume that it's humans. How much universe would we ever be able to cross? How far could we travel in 10,000 years if we had even the best sci-fi technology? We couldn't even reach the nearest galaxy to our own, yet there are millions of others, some larger, some smaller than ours, the furthest one we know of being somewhere like 14 BILLION lightyears away. Seems like a lot of wasted space, and for what?

Honestly, imagine that God only created one intelligent race. Just one, and for the sake of argument, lets assume that it's humans. How much universe would we ever be able to cross? How far could we travel in 10,000 years if we had even the best sci-fi technology? We couldn't even reach the nearest galaxy to our own, yet there are millions of others, some larger, some smaller than ours, the furthest one we know of being somewhere like 14 BILLION lightyears away. Seems like a lot of wasted space, and for what?

[quote user="Nova999"]^The two are not directly related. A nova is the explosion of a star. It does not automatically turn into a black hole. A black hole requires a great amount of mass. Perhaps a nova would slowly aquire enough mass as it attracts other objects, but as it occurs it does not on it's own lead to a black hole. [/quote]

[quote user="Scumbag"]^OK, well sometimes semantics nazi. Yes I realise its all dependent on the mass of the star and other factors. Probably about the mass of the dick on your forehead is sufficient for a failurenova..

[/quote]

Failure scumbag, you didnt even reply to his decent argument you simply launched into a tirade of name-calling. Yes i know its nova but none the less he had a good pont.

Nova999 wrote:

^The two are not directly related. A nova is the explosion of a star. It does not automatically turn into a black hole. A black hole requires a great amount of mass. Perhaps a nova would slowly aquire enough mass as it attracts other objects, but as it occurs it does not on it's own lead to a black hole.

Scumbag wrote:

^OK, well sometimes semantics nazi. Yes I realise its all dependent on the mass of the star and other factors. Probably about the mass of the dick on your forehead is sufficient for a failurenova..

Failure scumbag, you didnt even reply to his decent argument you simply launched into a tirade of name-calling. Yes i know its nova but none the less he had a good pont.

no dude, the universe shapes our opinion. if your opinion is shaping the universe you need to either a) put down the LSD for a bit or b) listen more to the voices in your head that are telling you to kill Wolffe with his own BB guns and post the videos to TAN

[/quote]

I vote for B.

KarnivOre wrote:

JudgeThreeWayDisciple wrote:

no dude, the universe shapes our opinion. if your opinion is shaping the universe you need to either a) put down the LSD for a bit or b) listen more to the voices in your head that are telling you to kill Wolffe with his own BB guns and post the videos to TAN

[quote user="seanboy"] [quote user=Nova999]^The two are not directly related. A nova is the explosion of a star. It does not automatically turn into a black hole. A black hole requires a great amount of mass. Perhaps a nova would slowly aquire enough mass as it attracts other objects, but as it occurs it does not on it's own lead to a black hole.[/quote]

[quote user=Scumbag] [/quote]

Failure scumbag, you didnt even reply to his decent argument you simply launched into a tirade of name-calling. Yes i know its nova but none the less he had a good pont.

[/quote]

Yes I did. Nova was just picking up on semantics, and being a dickhead. OK, so when a star goes nova it doesnt always turn into a black hole, only when the mass is sufficient to cause it. Just because I didnt go into a mass wiki linked response, doesnt make it fail. If you dont like it, tough shit.

seanboy wrote:

Nova999 wrote:

^The two are not directly related. A nova is the explosion of a star. It does not automatically turn into a black hole. A black hole requires a great amount of mass. Perhaps a nova would slowly aquire enough mass as it attracts other objects, but as it occurs it does not on it's own lead to a black hole.

Scumbag wrote:

Failure scumbag, you didnt even reply to his decent argument you simply launched into a tirade of name-calling. Yes i know its nova but none the less he had a good pont.

Yes I did. Nova was just picking up on semantics, and being a dickhead. OK, so when a star goes nova it doesnt always turn into a black hole, only when the mass is sufficient to cause it. Just because I didnt go into a mass wiki linked response, doesnt make it fail. If you dont like it, tough shit.