There are Now 400 Scientific Papers in 2017 Say ‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth
24 Oct, 2017
by Sierra Marlee

Progressives are having an increasingly difficult time holding onto the delusion that man-made climate change is a “consensus” among scientists. At one point, that was a major talking point of theirs, almost daring someone to reject the word of science.

Now that we’re discovering there was a lot of sketchy shenanigans going down surround the study of “climate change.” we’ve seen an increasing number of papers being published that call “global warming” a myth. Are these scientists just trying to distance themselves from the impropriety or is there actually nothing to the climate change scare?

James Delingpole reported earlier in 2017 that there were a shocking 58 scientific papers asserting that climate change is a hoax. Since that report, the number has skyrocketed to above 400.

These papers all state that the hype and hysteria surrounding “climate change” and “global warming” is not reflected by the actual data that is being collected around the world.

“Modern temperatures, sea levels, and extreme weather events are neither unusual nor unprecedented,” state these reports. “Many regions of the Earth are cooler now than they have been for most of the last 10,000 years.”

“Natural factors such as the Sun (106 papers), multi-decadal oceanic-atmospheric oscillations such as the NAO, AMO/PDO, ENSO (37 papers), decadal-scale cloud cover variations, and internal variability in general have exerted a significant influence on weather and climate changes during both the past and present,” they note. “Detecting a clear anthropogenic forcing signal amidst the noise of unforced natural variability may therefore be difficult.”

Wow, outstanding, liberals are so stupid that they’ve been tricked by the sun. This is just glorious.

“And current emissions-mitigation policies, especially related to the advocacy for renewables, are often costly, ineffective, and perhaps even harmful to the environment,” they conclude. “On the other hand, elevated CO2 and a warmer climate provide unheralded benefits to the biosphere (i.e., a greener planet and enhanced crop yields).”

Basically, we’ve wasted a significant amount of money on a cause that is propped up by fake science and false assertions. Gee, it’s almost like there was an entire political movement that has been saying this the whole time. Almost.

So now that liberals don’t have that magical MUH CONSENSUS on their side, they’re going to be forced to actually look into the opposition (stop laughing, it could happen) and discover that perhaps they were wrong. I mean, pigs could fly and hell could freeze over as well, but we’ll have to see.

Yep! There was a petition started back around the Climate Gate scandal when the IPCC got exposed for their "scientist" falsifying the data to push the global warming HOAX.
Almost 32,000 to date that disagree with the man made scare theory!http://www.petitionproject.org/

1. This Letter from over 60 highly credentialed scientists states that: “We the undersigned are individuals who have technical skills and knowledge relevant to climate science and the GHG Endangerment Finding. We each are convinced that the 2009 GHG Endangerment Finding is fundamentally flawed and that an honest, unbiased reconsideration is in order.”

2. The letter states further that: “If such a reconsideration is granted, each of us will assist in a new Endangerment Finding assessment that is carried out in a fashion that is legally consistent with the relevant statute and case law. We see this as a very urgent matter – – – – “

3. The Concerned Household Electricity Consumers Council fully endorses the recommendations of these scientists because recent research has definitively validated that: once certain natural factor (i.e., solar, volcanic and oceanic/ENSO activity) impacts on temperature data are accounted for, there is no “natural factor adjusted” warming remaining to be attributed to rising atmospheric CO2 levels. That is, these natural factor impacts fully explain the trends in all relevant temperature data sets over the last 50 or more years. At this point, there is no statistically valid proof that past increases in atmospheric CO2concentrations have caused what have been officially reported as rising, or even record setting, global average surface temperatures (GAST.)

4. Moreover, additional all new, research findings demonstrate that adjustments by government agencies to the GAST record render that record totally inconsistent with published credible temperature data sets and useless for any policy purpose.

5. These new results conclusively invalidate the claims based on GAST data of “record warming” in recent years, and thereby also invalidate the so-called “lines of evidence” on which EPA claimed to base its 2009 CO2 Endangerment Finding.

6. If the Endangerment Finding is not vacated, whether the current administration likes it or not, it is certain that electric utility, automotive and many other industries will face ongoing EPA CO2regulation.

7. This scientifically illiterate regulation will raise U.S. energy prices thereby reducing economic growth and jobs as well as our National Security.

8. The Electricity Consumers Council therefore, based on this new scientific evidence, must insist that the EPA grant the “very urgent” request of these scientists“that an honest, unbiased reconsideration is in order.”

Finally, we know that many more scientists would have been pleased to sign this letter if they had only known about it. Scientists may ask to have their name added by simply sending their info to THSResearch@aol.com.

The UN Admits That The Paris Climate Deal Was A Fraud
November 3, 2017

Global Hot Air: Here's a United Nations climate report that environmentalists probably don't want anybody to read. It says that even if every country abides by the grand promises they made last year in Paris to reduce greenhouse gases, the planet would still be "doomed."

When President Obama hitched America to the Paris accords in 2016, he declared that it was "the moment that we finally decided to save our planet." And when Trump pulled out of the deal this year, he was berated by legions of environmentalists for killing it.

But it turns out that the Paris accord was little more than a sham that will do nothing to "save the planet."

According to the latest annual UN report on the "emissions gap," the Paris agreement will provide only a third of the cuts in greenhouse gas that environmentalists claim is needed to prevent catastrophic warming. If every country involved in those accords abides by their pledges between now and 2030 — which is a dubious proposition — temperatures will still rise by 3 degrees C by 2100. The goal of the Paris agreement was to keep the global temperature increase to under 2 degrees. ((read more)

Just a reminder of what ISN'T happening in the world of "Global Warming" predictions from back in 1992 and the "Prophets" of gloom and doom turned out to be completely WRONG!

Scientists Say Earth Is Doomed Without 'Urgent' Action — Just Like They Did 25 Years Ago
11/14/2017

Environment: This week, thousands of scientists issued a bleak and terrifying "second notice" to mankind about how we will destroy the planet unless we take "urgent" action. If this warning is as reliable as the first notice these scientists issued in 1992, we have nothing to worry about.

In an article published in the journal Bioscience, 15,364 scientists warned that we are "jeopardizing our future" and that "immediate action" is needed to "safeguard our imperiled biosphere."

"Soon it will be too late to shift course away from our failing trajectory, and time is running out," the scientists say.

The article is meant to be an update on a 1992 notice — ominously titled "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity" and signed by 1,700 leading scientists — that predicted environmental catastrophes to come if humans remained on the current course.

But the 1992 statement was wildly off the mark in its dire predictions.

Back then, the world's leading scientists said that, if current trends continued, air pollution would get worse, water supplies would run short, the world's supply of fish would sharply decline because of dying oceans, land would become less productive, vast acres of forests would be "gone in a few years," mass extinctions would limit the ability to develop new medicines, and unchecked population growth would cause more to live in poverty and suffer malnutrition.

"No more than one or a few decades remain," the scientists warned 2-1/2 decades ago, "before the chance to avert the threats we now confront will be lost and the prospects for humanity immeasurably diminished."

Turns out that the world didn't make any "fundamental changes" those scientists said were so urgently needed. If anything, it went faster in the same direction.

There was no concerted effort to control population, which grew by almost 1.9 billion — a 34% increase in 25 years. We didn't "move away from fossil fuels" — global consumption climbed nearly 56% since 1992. We didn't "greatly reduce over consumption," either. Consumer spending on goods and services soared some 56% from 1990 to 2010.

And what happened to the "fragile planet" that was supposedly on the knife's edge of permanent destruction? You can find that out HERE !