Submit news
tips and press releases to Editor at WeeklyUniverse dot com.All
submissions become property of the Weekly Universe and deemed for publication
without compensation unless otherwise requested. Name and contact
information only withheld upon request.

ONLY THE 'MAD GULLIBLE' BELIEVE
WE WENT TO THE MOON!

[WeeklyUniverse.com]You
gotta be mad gullible to understand a few simple things about the 'luny
project' of over a quarter century ago -- and still think we was there
in flesh and bones!

Four quick facts:

(1) What's a major part of a car? The engine!

Did you see one
on the luny rovers? They were so puny you couldn't even see them!
The footage of spinning wheels cemented the fact that this was a hoax.
Small motor, big torque -- 1950s technology don't compute!

(2) It
took a week for astronauts to swap out a mirror on the Hubble space
telescope.

So now, how long
would it take to assemble an entire lunar land rover?! Yes, that's
taking into consideration that the lunar rover was mostly "pre- assembled."

And where was
the engine hoist?

(3) A second
cloth was supposedly used as a landing gear? I don't think so!
Anything coming out of the back end of a 2-ton object moving at mach 7
lightning
speed through the earth's atmosphere would not only be torn to shreds,
it would be ripped off the back end in a split second!

(4) Where's
all these high-powered spy satellites everyone brags about that can read
newsprint? No thought of aiming one at the moon?

Had there been
lunar rovers, as we were led to believe, and had they been driven for miles
on the lunar surface, as we were led to believe, a multi-mile area of tire
tracks should be visible by these spy satellites that can read newsprint.
So why don't they photograph and show the tire tracks to us?

"Weekly Universe" and "WeeklyUniverse.com" and "Mystic Gray Buddha" trademarks are currently unregistered, but pending registration upon need for protection against improper use. The idea of marketing these terms as a commodity is a protected idea under the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. s 1114(1) (1994) (defining a trademark infringement claim when the plaintiff has a registered mark); 15 U.S.C. s 1125(a) (1994) (defining an action for unfair competition in the context of trademark infringement when the plaintiff holds an unregistered mark). All articles copyright the author or WeeklyUniverse.com.