Hi Pierre,
No problem, let me know when you have something in. I can't be sure all
I mentioned is all that's missing. It's all I got so far.
But since I can't get our end going. I can't really give you a
comprehensive list of what's exactly missing. Hopefully this is all and
it will work fine after your changes.
Thanks for doing this,
C.
Pierre GM wrote:
> Charles,
>>>> all i was saying is that 1.0.4 was working great with the small
>> compatibility layer.
>> I even have a frozen version of 1.0.5 devel that works great. Then
>> suddenly everything broke.
>>>> Could you be more specific ? Would you mind sending me bug reports so that I
> can check what's going on and how to improve backwards compatibility ?
>>>> I was really happy was the layer of 1.0.4.
>>>> We're talking about the 15-line long numpy.oldnumeric.ma, right ? The ones
> that redefines "take" as to take the averages along some indices ? The only
> difference between versions is that 1.0.5 uses numpy.ma instead of the old
> numpy.core.ma.
> [...]
> OK, now I see: there were some functions in numpy.core.ma that are not in
> numpy.ma (identity, indices). So, the pb is not in the conversion layer, but
> on numpy.ma itself. OK, that should be relatively easy to fix. Can you gimme
> a day or two ?
>> Sorry for the delayed comprehension.
> P.
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
>Numpy-discussion@scipy.org>http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion>>