These sto­ries hap­pened from 11⁄2 to 6 years ago

( The text ver­sion is in Just Us sec­tion. Please check “Let­ter of Roga­tory” also. Just pulled of the way-​back )

(1998) Seat Belts The First Time (case dismissed)

(2011) Let­ter of Rotatory

(2010) The Last Time

This is the third install­ment of seat belts. My true story about my deal­ing with the pol­icy enforce­ment offi­cers and their courts. This time it didn’t go as smooth as the last two times. There are a few rea­sons for that, I’m also happy that I waited to write this story. Because now (after think­ing about it,) I have a bet­ter under­stand­ing of what hap­pen in the court. But let me start at the beginning.

At the end of last year (2011) I was trav­el­ing from a friends house to home. (Hope­fully you have read or lis­ten to the audio seat-​belt, and have read seat-​belt 2. If not you should do that first as to not get con­fused.) that tells the story about when I was stop by pol­icy enforce­ment offi­cers. This time one thing (which wasmy ask­ing for I.D.) lead to another and I found myself in jail. This may seem like a bad thing and many times it is. (it’s a good thing for me I don’t work for an employer.) What hap­pens is that if you know your law and you reflect back you will learn some­thing. I learned that when stopped one should advice the offi­cer that “By con­tin­u­ing this line of con­ver­sa­tion that you are enter­ing into a con­tract.” I’ll always have my phone near by so I can record it. It does not mat­ter if he does not agree, his action speak louder than his words could ever speak. Some­thing you may want to remind him of. You can also at this time advice him of your fee sched­ule. (I gave one of 500 an hour and 5000 an hour if arrested) How much you charge for the time that your giv­ing him. He is get­ting paid for his time, and your time is not free!

Should you see fit, you may col­lect on it later. Let’s talk about what hap­pen in court. [But first I have to tell you that the last time I was stopped I was not in the city, I was in New York, but in the out­ly­ing county. The courts are smaller and you have more access to the admin­is­trate of the case (The judge). I cre­ated another let­ter as the one that in seat­belt 2 and went to give it to the clerk to give to the judge, as I did the last time. The clerk would not take it. So I asked for the name of the judge on the case. After find­ing where his court­room was, I took the let­ter to his court room and gave it to the bal­let. He gave it to the judge. Some time pass and he came back with it. He said the judge was not going to take it. At the time this was a prob­lem, but look­ing back on what hap­pen, I now see it did work. I say that because when the court date came, that judge was no were to be found. He had removed him­self from the case. [Once looked at the judge is bound by it! Because he in fact did get it.]

So when I get to court there is a new judge that I didn’t give a notice too, and I also have this pub­lic defender that they attach to me, and I can’t go to court with him unless I want to lose. I see this could go on for­ever, If I give this judge a notice they will just change the judge on the case. So I told them I needed time to find a lawyer. A stall tac­tic. I did this two times because now I have to find another tac­tic for going back to court and win­ning. Well first I have to get rid of the pub­lic defender, so I can deal with the court mas­ter to pub­lic ser­vant. So I told the pub­lic defender that he can rep­re­sent me if he signs my con­tract. Remem­ber from seat­belt 1 (above) we all have the right to con­tract and no one or court can stop that! Well when I put this to the pub­lic defender he said “No Con­di­tions”. To which I replied ” Why would I want you to defend me uncon­di­tion­ally?” Please under­stand that is to say, that what­ever he wants to do with the case he can! Well thats not the way I roll! I didn’t say any more than that because the rest has to be saved for the right time in court. I get to court and they call my name ( now there is that thing with the name that I talked about in the last two install­ments of this story. But they don’t apply as there is no ques­tion of who I am after an arrest.) I go up and state “I can’t find a lawyer to sign my con­tract” and I have the mail stubs from the post office that I mail out in seat-​belts 1 some 3 years ago. I also have my case all worked out in a folder which I placed on the table pro­vided for lawyers to read from should I need to use them. I notice that the judge and the pros­e­cu­tor looked at me funny (like whats he doing) then they looked at the pub­lic defender. With­out any­one ask­ing the pub­lic defender said “He still look­ing for a lawyer.” (remem­ber I did the stall tac­tic once before) To which I quickly added “that’s cor­rect I can’t find a lawyer who will sign my con­tract to rep­re­sent me in this mat­ter.” The judge looks at me and said “What con.…” but then she stop ask­ing what ever she was going to ask me. What was she going to ask? Could it be “what con­tract?” Of cause that would have been a very bad ques­tion to ask some­one who is not a lawyer in court. One needs to under­stand that every­thing that hap­pens in court has been played out at some­time in the past and every­one in the court sys­tem knows the play-​book except you. So the judge knows as do lawyers not to ask a ques­tion in court when they don’t known the answer you going to give. In this case the judge would have got­ten the terms of the con­tract and it would be on the record. And it could give ideas to oth­ers who will come after me. Just in case you ever need to use this, here is how it works. They (Lawyers) will never ask to see the con­tract, because they know they will not sign it any­way. I under­stand that might not be good enough for you. So you what to know, whats in it (or what would be in this con­tract.) There are only three things you need in your contract.

1. That the lawyer will not argue the facts of the case.

2 That the lawyer be con­verted on all charges.

3 That the lawyer will accept pri­vate funds for compensation.

What does this mean?

1. That the lawyer will not argue the facts of the case. If you have read or lis­ten to W.B.A.I. story then you know that every­thing in court has to do with com­mer­cial law (busi­ness law) so the facts of the case about com­mit­ting an offense are irrelevant.

2 That the lawyer be con­verted on all charges. This is just say­ing you refuse to be held respon­si­ble for what comes out of his mouth. And that if any­one will go to jail it will be the lawyer not you.

3 That the lawyer will accept pri­vate funds for com­pen­sa­tion. For this one go back to my story on money. As there is no money the law is that one can’t ask for any one type of cur­rency. So use your own funds. Accept for value (accepted for value) if you don’t know what that is just go to you-​tube and do a search.

(There is also a long con­tract on this site which also works!) [No longer available ]

OK, where was I? Right, the judge was just about to ask a bad ques­tion. So she (the judge) didn’t go into that line of ques­tion­ing. Instead she said Well Mr. Adinkra­hene you have a lawyer stand­ing right next to you and he is will­ing to rep­re­sent you. I said to the judge “Oh No! I already asked him and he said he wouldn’t sign it. At this point the lawyer had a real stu­pid look on his face almost made me bust out laugh­ing in court. The judge then said in a mat­ter a fact way “Well Mr Adinkra­hene he can’t sign your con­tract because he already has a con­tract with the city to defend you.” To which I replied “Well it sounds like he has a con­flict of inter­est!” CHECK­MATE, or as they say in the game, check and mate! I look at the judge and she had a big smile on her face. Was she hid­ing her embar­rass­ment for falling into my sim­ple trap, or was she happy that some­one in the city is think­ing? I can’t say but she next said. “OK what we are going to do is dis­miss the case for 90 day pend­ing dis­charge” I think she could see on my face that I was not going for that because she looks at me and said “Whats the prob­lem now Mr. Adinkra­hene that’s the best you can hope for with the charges you have against you.” It was now my turn to give orders, so I said I would be very happy if the case were dis­charge now!” To which she replied “Granted!” (end of case.) Let me put some tape on the open ends. When a case is dis­missed, things in the case (pub­lic funds/​bonds) are still out in your name. Dis­charge means that there is no more energy in the case. Hope this helps some­one. But I sug­gest you get grounded in the max­ims of law before attempt­ing any­thing in court! And don’t wait till you need them to learn them!

It is Best to look at our cur­rent sys­tem of law as THESPOON!

Replace the word spoon for law.

There is no spoon!

A note for the last time:

What I for­got to men­tion is that the sec­ond time I went to court, I also had a con­ver­sa­tion with the judge. In that con­ver­sa­tion I was asked if I was work­ing. And I told the judge “No” she then asked how I was going to pay for the lawyer? Why would she be con­cerned how I pay for a lawyer? I can only think that if I told her that I was using FRN’s (Fed­eral Reserve Note) that she could use that as her assump­tion that I was under her juris­dic­tion.