At present, LMSC and Project 802 seem to be used interchangeably, which is not
exactly an aid to the clarity of the document. If you feel that "Project
802" needs to be retained, then either:

- Lose LMSC as a term (probably not helpful, as it is much more common usage
than Project 802 these days); or

- Mention up front that the terms "Prokject 802" and "LMSC"
are one and the same thing, and that for clarity, LMSC is used in the document.

Regards,
Tony

At 23:11 20/02/2005, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:

Tony,

I remember the comment, but don’t think we really discussed it. I
don’t agree with the statement. I think I tried to do this once
before and was told that formally we are still ‘Project 802’.
Until someone like IEEE SA or IEEE CS tells me otherwise, I presume we are
still Project 802. If someone can provide evidence to the contrary
I’d love to hear it. I’d prefer to get rid of the term
myself, but so far have not been successful.

I seem to recall someone mentioning during the telecon that "Project
802" is an outdated term that should be replaced (presumably by IEEE 802
LMSC, or just LMSC?). I notice that you didn't do a search & destroy on
instances of Project 802 in the revised text.

Regards,
Tony

At 22:18 20/02/2005, Sherman,
Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:

Folks,

Here
is what I have so far for this ballot. There has been so much editing
that I’ve turned rev’s off to make it easier to read.You
can turn rev’s on if you want to see the details. Please comment if
you see any errors. 7.1.2 is so complex thatI’m inclined
to do a complete rewrite ofit. However I want to make
sure I complete the other two ballots first before I attempt it. I will
keep all the content. I just want to organize the flow better to make
things easier to read.

I do
haveone requestof the LMSC Chair (Paul).We
have put in partial descriptions of duties for some of the appointed
positions. I’d like tofinish the job and put in duties for
all the appointed positions. Could you provide a brief description ofresponsibilitiesfor
Recording Secretary, Executive Secretary, and Treasurer?

I am
also waiting for Pat on a formal input on7.1.5.1 item 7
(formerly item 8). I’ve seen some reflector debate, but I don’t
think we’ve settled on a text yet.

Finally
I will shortly be polling the ECfor opposition on two sub issues,
Member Emeriti and EC Telecons to see if I should divide the question on those
two issues.

That’s
it for now.

Regards,

Mat

<<802.0-EC_Membership_&_Meetings-Proposed_ballot_resolution_r3.doc>>

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.

Senior Member Technical Staff

BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR

Office: +1 973.633.6344

email:
matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.

> Regards,
Tony
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.

Regards,
Tony

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.