Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Review: Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World (2010)

In many ways, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is the equivalent of the TwilightSaga for boys. It is deeply rooted in pubescent romantic fantasy, albeit this time from the male's point of view. It is foolish and shallow about the ways of relationships, pandering to the basest instincts of the target audience. Like the Twilight Saga, one could argue that the lessons imparted from this film could be almost dangerous if applied to the real world, although I will again remark that it's only an escapist fantasy. And like that blockbuster series, I genuinely enjoyed nearly everything about it except for the core love triangle. The film is visually dazzling, often stunningly imaginative and playful. It is bright and colorful and filled to the brim with delightful and intelligent supporting characters. I just couldn't stand to spend any real time with Bella, Edward, and Jacob... I mean Scott Pilgrim, Romona Flowers, and Knives Chou.

A token amount of plot: Scott Pilgrim (Michael Cera) is an aimless 22-year old rocker who is still heartbroken after his girlfriend 'kicked his heart in the ass' (broke up with him and then became a successful rock star) well over a year ago. He's currently involved with Knives Chou (Ellen Wong), a seventeen-year old Asian Catholic schoolgirl who worships the ground he walks on while he barely gives her the time of day or any real affection. None the less, he is instantly smitten when he spots Romona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) at a party and quickly begins to date her as well. Alas, Flowers has neglected to mention that in order to date her, Scott must defeat her seven 'evil' exes in glorious 'mortal kombat'. Can Scott Pilgrim defeat the exes, be honest with Knives, win the girl, and help his band make it big?

First the good news: the film is an audio/visual wonderland, as the simple narrative gives way to a potent mash up between comic book and video game worlds. Sound effects are spelled out onscreen, the film is edited together like a 'cut scene' from an 80s video game, and the action scenes are bursting with larger than life moments from any given video game over the last thirty years (defeated foes explode into a pile of gold coins). The film is filled with colorful dialogue and quirky supporting characters. Kieren Culkin has a star-making turn as Scott's gay roommate, someone who reminds us that the best friends are the ones who tell us to go to hell. If the film makes his character a bit too much about being gay, then at least he's allowed to have an active and onscreen love life. Anna Kendrick has a few amusing scenes as Scott's empathetic but frustrated sister, and Aubrey Plaza is almost a walking, talking rebuttal to the absurdly naive core romance. And at least a few of the 'evil exes' make an impression, as Chris Evans is amusing as an action film star and Brandon Routh scores big laughs as a rocker whose devotion to veganism gives him super powers (intentional or not, he ends up resembling the much-derided 'lightning Superman' from the late 1990s).

Alas, in the middle of this video game come to life is a stunningly hollow center. While any number of films can survive a passive protagonist, having an actively self-destructing and/or obnoxiously moronic protagonist is usually fatal. Scott Pilgrim, through little fault of Michael Cera, is a stunningly unsympathetic lead character. He is lazy, careless, thoughtlessly cruel, and completely self-pitying. He ignores the needs and wishes of his fellow band members and completely uses the worshiping Knives for no particular purpose other than to feed his own withering ego. His pursuit of Romona Flowers basically amounts to making as much of an ass out of himself as possible yet still winning her affection because Winstead read the script ahead of time. Even after he's inexplicably stolen Romona's heart (or at least her passing interest), he spends most of the time in a swirl of self-pity in the 'why does she like me?/when will she dump me?' vein. That the lead character is pretty much a hardcore loser who eventually learns a lesson (at the last possible moment of this nearly-two hour film) isn't the problem. The problem is that we're supposed to be rooting for this moron from the first minute. By thirty minutes in, I was solidly on the side of 'the World'.

As for Knives, Ellen Wong certainly gives it her all. But since we like her in that lost puppy kind of way, we feel a constant swell of pity whenever she's onscreen, as nearly every moment is filled with hurt and sorrow at the hands of 'our hero'. Romona Flowers is herself a severely under-developed character. And frankly, without going into spoiler details, any bits of romantic substance to be gleaned from this film were dealt with in a more mature and adult manner in She's Out of My League. While the film seems to be about Scott Pilgrim overcoming Romona's emotional baggage, the climax throws that all out the window for a finale where Scott Pilgrim literally has to rescue Ramona, who is now revealed as a brainwashed hostage of the final 'evil ex'. Remember kids, that girl you like isn't really having issues dealing with past crappy relationships, she's just under the mind control of her slimy ex-boyfriend, and it's your job to save her. The gall of the film to just toss out whatever little bits of substance it contained in order to go into full-on hero-complex fantasy is just appalling (when Scott enters the villain's lair, Romona is literally kneeling like a dog beside her ex-boyfriend's throne).

Okay, so I found the film's romantic politics more than a bit disconcerting and I found the lead character to be relatively insufferable. But that doesn't mean that the rest of the film isn't genuinely entertaining and occasionally smart. Although, to be completely honest, the film runs out of narrative steam about an hour into it (the battles with exes four, five, and six could have been cut completely with no real effect). I bent over backwards to be fair with the Twilight Saga(Twilight and Eclipse anyway), basically saying that I could forgive the issues with its core romantic triangle because I liked the world where it existed and the colorful supporting characters. And the two would-be franchises are surprisingly similar in their core character relationships. Scott is the low self-esteem lead who clings to and obsesses about the unattainable and emotionally distant hottie Ramona, while Knives is the lovesick kid who Scott keeps around for kicks despite having no real interest in her. Sound familiar? Heck, in this love triangle, the only one who really grows up is Knives, which gives the film an advantage over the Twilight Saga where Jacob is still pining for Bella at the end of three pictures. So if I can give Twilight a pass, why not this Edgar Wright video game epic?

Perhaps the reason I am less forgiving of Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World is because this film is specifically aimed at me. Yes, I know that I may be a bit older than the core demo, but I know full-well that the 15-year old Scott Mendelson would have found this movie condescending, patronizing and naive as well. Sitting in the theater, it was almost embarrassing to realize that this film's ideas about romantic politics was directly aimed at my demographic. Perhaps Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World is Israel. Sure, there are many other countries in the world who behave worse than Israel. But as a Jewish American, when Israel screws up, I take it personally and am that much more critical of them as a result. As something that is supposed to represent the movie-going tastes of my specific demographic, I damn well take it personally when Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World ends up dropping the ball in such a fashion. In the realm of relationships, this film makes us nerds look awfully stupid.

5 comments:

It's odd -- reading your review, it seems like we watched two completely different movies, and you skipped the entire final act of the film, save a few scenes.

To me, it seemed like the main character really was supposed to be a self-absorbed ass -- likable only because Cera embodied him. People remind Scott Pilgrim of this right from the very first minute. As one girl says, "if your personality were a face, I'd punch it." I think his "last minute" epiphany is meant to resonate with those (single beta males and geeks) watching the film. They're meant to realize that they're just as self-absorbed as the main character, and that needs to change. I was actually quite shocked by the lack of shallowness in this regard. And I loved the idea that the film lures you in with a false promise (shallow geekiness) and still pays off, but in different ways (reminded me of Zombieland in this regard).

I also thought the dynamic of their relationship was surprisingly complex -- that he was just as destructive and fleeting as she was, only he didn't realize it. And perhaps now that they are both aware of their flaws, they can grow as a couple. Knives learned a different lesson, but she too learns something valuable -- that her obsession was her undoing. She's probably a better friend to Scott Pilgrim than a girlfriend.

Allegedly, the comic does a much better job fleshing out just why Scott Pilgrim and Ramona fall for one another, but I think it worked here -- barely -- but I understood what Wright was trying to do. He seemed to be suggesting that the two had fallen for one another before truly giving up their pasts. Thusly, their relationship sort of was shallow, intentionally (and occasionally humorously) so.

i loved reading your review, but i'm not sure i liked how the film was adapted from graphic novel. i'm not sure it worked in that respect. i had some thoughts about it in my review, check it out and comment if you likejackhttp://splicedreviews.blogspot.com/2010/08/scott-pilgrim-vs-world-has-trouble.html

You know, I have to go with Shaffer on this... I thought the movie was pretty explicitly about how both Ramona and Scott needed to grow up, and we were also witnessing Knives' maturation. I don't think there's any comparison to be made to Twilight, which is about wish fulfillment, and where none of the characters suffer or lose anything.

It's odd -- reading your review, it seems like we watched two completely different movies, and you skipped the entire final act of the film, save a few scenes.

To me, it seemed like the main character really was supposed to be a self-absorbed ass -- likable only because Cera embodied him. People remind Scott Pilgrim of this right from the very first minute. As one girl says, "if your personality were a face, I'd punch it." I think his "last minute" epiphany is meant to resonate with those (single beta males and geeks) watching the film. They're meant to realize that they're just as self-absorbed as the main character, and that needs to change. I was actually quite shocked by the lack of shallowness in this regard. And I loved the idea that the film lures you in with a false promise (shallow geekiness) and still pays off, but in different ways (reminded me of Zombieland in this regard).

I also thought the dynamic of their relationship was surprisingly complex -- that he was just as destructive and fleeting as she was, only he didn't realize it. And perhaps now that they are both aware of their flaws, they can grow as a couple. Knives learned a different lesson, but she too learns something valuable -- that her obsession was her undoing. She's probably a better friend to Scott Pilgrim than a girlfriend.

Allegedly, the comic does a much better job fleshing out just why Scott Pilgrim and Ramona fall for one another, but I think it worked here -- barely -- but I understood what Wright was trying to do. He seemed to be suggesting that the two had fallen for one another before truly giving up their pasts. Thusly, their relationship sort of was shallow, intentionally (and occasionally humorously) so.

The reason this review is so off base is because Mendelson doesn't seem to understand the filmmakers are two steps ahead of him. They KNOW how obnoxious Scott is, but, as they say, the quality of mercy is not strained, etc. This movie is not aimed at 15 year olds (who would have little patience for unflattering characterizations), but at adults who see their own youthful folly play out in such a surprisingly witty and sad and beautiful way.

Because it is possible to re-edit essays after they have been posted, please feel free to alert me to any typos, grammar issues, and questions of factual accuracy, preferably by email and not in the comments section. And, also, since I often embed video clips, please let me know if any said clips are no longer functioning. Thanks.

About Me

The basics - 31 years old, married with two children, currently residing in Woodland Hills, CA. I am simply a longtime film critic and pundit of sorts, especially in the realm of box office. The main content will be film reviews, trailer reviews, essays, and box office analysis and comparison. I also syndicate myself at The Huffington Post, Valley Scene Magazine, and Open Salon.
I will update as often as my schedule allows. Yes, I'm on Facebook/Twitter/LinkIn, so feel free to find me there. All comments are appreciated, just be civil and try to keep a level discourse, as I will make every effort to do the same.