Scripture Index

Notes: The links above will take you to relevant posts here on E2R. AD refers to AD70 and the End of the World and the relevant chapter number (eg: AD11 = chapter 11). TW and TQ refer to The Gospel in Ten Words and The Gospel in Twenty Questions respectively and the numbers refer to chapters (eg: TW2 = chapter 2 in Ten Words; TQ19 = chapter 19 in Twenty Questions). H refers to The Hyper-Grace Gospel with the relevant section/part number (eg: H-B4 = Part B, myth 4; H-C5 = Part C, chapter 5). Please report any errors or typos using the comment form below.

I was looking up kings. Where the prophet asks his friend to hit him so he refuses and God has a lion kill the friend, also where the bears maul 42 children for mocking a prophet. These stories sound crazy to me. Why wuld a god do that and I cannot understand stories like this through the lens ofnchrist. Help? Thanks.

Peggy,
I am not an authority in Bible interpretation, but in light of no other explanation given, I offer my view for you to consider. I have learnt to interprete those scriptures in light of God’s love nature. What I mean is that, after seeing the Father’s true nature displayed by Jesus, I now see such things is in light of the limited revelation man had before Christ. You see, before we could have God’s Spirit indwelling in us and even before Christ came to personify God (Emmanuel; Heb 1:3), man just assumed everything was God’s doing. Even to this day we attribute nature’s disasters as “Acts of God.” The truth is that most of these things can and should be attributed to Satan, who through God-given authority to man, illegally became the god of this world (2 Cor. 4:4).

Spiritually dead people cannot understand most of these life events, and as such, they just find a way to cope with the “mysteries.” As new creation in Christ, we not only can see Christ as the “…brightness of God’s glory and the exact representation of His person” (Heb 1:3), but we have Him as our life. We are now spiritually alike to spiritually discern right from wrong.

Amazing response, the true revelation of the father is found in christ. Many did not know the father in the old testament as revealed by Christ and because of this lack of knowledge of the true nature of God the pre-cross man attributed anything they didnt understand to God.

Hi Peggy, all scripture is inspired but “inspired” doesn’t mean it’s “true” as if God spoke it himself.
Jesus himself(matt5) pointed to “men of old” saying things that were not God’s intention.
In short, everyone everyone everyone before Jesus struggled to describe and live the true nature of God.
John the Baptist was said to be the greatest prophet because he pointed to Jesus. most accurately. He literally said”there he is”.
Even John didn’t see the complete picture.

Jesus said, “love your enemy”, “forgive your enemy”, “make no account of wrongs”.
These statements were always, from the beginning of time, God’s nature and intention but men were inspired only slowly and incrementally to understand God in ways other than their neighbouring nations .

All their neighbors saw their god’s as angry retributive vengeful punishing god’s.

We must interpret scripture through Jesus.
Scripture doesn’t help to interpret scripture if we begin with the wrong knowledge of who God is.
Jesus is the perfect image of God, Jesus actions and words were as Gods own actions and words.
“Men of old” struggled (wrestled)
with god’s of their own making, just as we do now.

Thank you for your ministry. Your blog is a constant encouragement for me. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on 2 Corinthians 13:5… a rather well-known evangelist was quoting this on Twitter to instruct us that we need to check our behavior to see if we are in the faith or not.

I should write a post on this passage. Short version, Paul is not encouraging us to become navel-gazers. His constant message was “See Jesus.” See yourself approved in him. “Don’t you realize that Christ is in you?” Paul is not saying we need to carry out periodic self-examinations to ensure we are maintaining our salvation, for it is Christ who is in us who is our life. “Unless you’re an unbeliever and fail the test.”

Paul – in light of your response to Peggy above, how do we reconcile the passage in II Timothy 3:16, that “ALL scripture is inspired (lit – breathed-out) by God…”. Obviously when that was written the entire NT was not even completed, so much of their reference was from the OT. Didn’t the Holy Spirit lead each writer of Scripture; were they not “born along” by the Holy Spirit to write such things? If we are left up to each writer being “under” inspired or lacking clear revelation, then how do we parse out the highest vs the least illuminated passages? Do we really have the option to pick and choose like that? This is somewhat of a rhetorical question, because when you read the Psalms, it appears to be freighted with these types of passages, i.e. David at one moment speaking of God forsaking him, then the next, praising Him for His utter goodness and faithfulness. I am by no stretch fighting for a right to see God through an ugly filter, but just on full stretch to see Him in all of His goodness. I just want to be faithful to the whole Bible, not just the passages that I think the authors were less enlightened on. I think there are a lot of passages that beg for intellectual and spiritual honesty and reconciliation and would love your thoughts around this! :o)

Greetings Paul!
I have a question about a statement that Jesus has made and is recorded in Matthew 13:13, Mark 4:12 and again in Luke 8:10. The disciples in all three gospels ask Jesus why he teaches using parables. Is it me or am I misunderstanding Jesus’ response when he quotes Isaiah 6:9-10? Paraphrasing it all it sure sounds like, “If you hear, I’m not going to let you understand; if you can see, I’m not going to let you perceive, lest you hear and see and understand and I have to heal you!’
Now I know my LORD, and his business is all about see, hearing and understanding, so somehow I’m pretty sure it’s most likely my lack of understanding. But could you clarify this for me?

I have greatly been liberated from self-hatred and even a desire to die by the preaching of “hyper-grace”.

Someone tossed Philippians 3:10-16 my way. I’m really curious what you have to say about these verses, because I would certainly like to have peace about them. What is it that Paul has not yet taken hold of? Why does he want Jesus’ sufferings? How could he somehow “attain” the resurrection? And what is “living up to what we’ve already attained”?

Some say that Paul was longing for martyrdom. “I want to participate in his sufferings” (Php 3:10). He wanted a death like Christ’s. The thing he has not yet obtained is resurrection (vv.11-12). He hasn’t obtained it because he hasn’t died. Although Paul says in Colossians that we are complete in Christ – we lack nothing – here he says he has not yet attained his goal (v.14). What’s the goal? It’s seeing Jesus face to face. It’s knowing him fully. “For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face” (1 Cor 13:12). Paul’s desire to be with Christ is apparent at the start of his letter:

For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain. If I am to go on living in the body, this will mean fruitful labor for me. Yet what shall I choose? I do not know! I am torn between the two: I desire to depart and be with Christ, which is better by far; but it is more necessary for you that I remain in the body. (Php 1:21-24)

I have recently seen a statistic that everyone who makes $25,000 or more each year are richer that than 48% of the world (I’m not sure if that is accurate or not). Which made me think about Matthew 19:24. What are your thoughts on wealth, and is there an article on here that would answer my questions on being a wealthy Christian? Sorry I posted on this page, but I couldn’t find another article to post on. Thanks.

If you are after The Word which includes the Truth of The Gospel of Grace in Christ Jesus, you are not like those people with itching ears. You are wanting the pure Gospel of how we have salvation thru Jesus Christ not some other crazy stuff. If you just want to hear how Jesus saves and sets free, you are wanting to hear the truth that C.H.Spurgeon preached day after day after day. Nothing else saves or sets free. 🙂

That’s an interesting point for sure. Sometimes I feel the same way as well. I think that there has definitely been a move in Christianity of trying to understand the grace of God which is wonderful. But sometimes it feels as though we try to fit all of these scriptures into the “grace box” rather than accepting them for what they are. I don’t know…I’m no expert but I definitely think that no group or denomination can fully grasp all there is to know about God and when you believe you know it all that’s when a group can get in trouble. That happens in many churches when they become a band aid instead of a life saving medicine. After all the verse says that we do not need anyone to teach us because we have the Holy Spirit in us, so when we glorify what teachers have to say (even if they are grace teachers) above his revelation that’s when we get in trouble.

Recently I had 1 Timothy4:12-16 tossed at me. After going to my bible app and reading a couple of different translations I’m getting stuck on this idea that Paul is exhorting Timothy to “work” – toil and strive in the ESV (verse 10). Then in v16 ‘Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.’
I’ve tended to get turned off lately when I hear believers talk of ‘godliness’. It seems to always be tied to my activities and what I’m doing and/or not doing.

Paul, do you have any insight on this? On the surface it sure seems that there are some works to be done here. Is this passage directly applicable to us today? Is it more for a teacher or preacher instead of myself who is not. I didn’t receive a counsel of elders or a special prophecy like Timothy did.

I’m fairly certain Paul wasn’t preaching a doctrine based on Timothy the Saviour – “save both yourself and your hearers” – especially since he’s just referred to God our hope and the Saviour of all men (verse 10). Since there is no chance that Timothy can actually save himself, we need not fear that he can unsave himself.

Sometimes it helps to flip these verses around and look at the opposite meaning. Paul is exhorting Timothy to persevere. “Don’t neglect the gift.” What would happen if he did neglect the gift? Timothy would have difficulty. He wouldn’t enjoy God’s grace. He’d be fruitless. He wouldn’t walk in the blessing God has provided. And because he’s not blessed, others wouldn’t get blessed.

Paul has just told Timothy that godly living has value for all things. If you are immoral, drunken, violent, quarrelsome and love money you’re going to be miserable and people will hate you. Paul has also told Timothy not to neglect his gift of preaching and teaching. If Timothy neglected this gift, folks might not hear about God the Savior and might not get saved. Just my quick thoughts.

Can you help us always have a grace filter. Trusting in jesus insuch a way that i receive therapy thru psalm 37 and just asking the holy spirit to go sic em (speaking of my recepters toward sin) is helping.

Nothing from your heavenly Father should trouble you or make you anxious. What creates anxiety is uncertainty regarding his good intentions for us. Rev 22:12 refers to the reward Jesus brings with him. No doubt some use these words as carrots to motivate works-based religion, but that is not the sort of reward Jesus brings. I have written several posts on rewards under grace. You can find them in the Archives>Subject Index.

Rev 22:14 is about washing your robes. Much of the new covenant is about exchanging our stinky self-righteous garments for the robes of his righteousness, but the metaphor here refers to washing our robes. How do we do that? In the blood of the Lamb (see Rev 7:14). Only those made clean by Jesus can enter through the gates into the city.

Thank you for your gracious response. I’ll definitely follow through with studying the archived teachings on rewards. Your writings and lessons are most helpful, especially for folks like me who come from a very legalistic Christian background. Salvation purely by grace really does at times seem almost too good to be true. It is absolutely wonderful! “Grace” preachers such as yourself and Joseph Prince have opened my eyes and heart to how extraordinarily loving our Lord is. Thank you so very much.

Hi Paul, I wonder what your take on 1 Thessalonians 4:6 is? In the light of God’s grace, and the fact that all punishment for sin was placed on Jesus, how is it that Paul seems to be saying here to brothers in Christ (verse 1) that God will punish them if they commit these sins? PS Thanks for this AWESOME resource! 🙂

Hi Dan, you’re welcome. I presume you are referring to the NIV which says “The Lord will punish all those who commit such sins.” This is a poor translation of the word ekdikos, which in almost every other translation looks something like this. “The Lord is the avenger in all these things.” God is not a punisher, but an avenger, meaning, he’s in the business of making things right.

Paul is telling the Thessalonians the same thing he says to the Romans: “Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord” (Rom 12:19). (It’s also in Heb 10:30.)

When we are unjustly treated the temptation is to take matters into our own hands and settle accounts. James and John tried to play the judge, jury and executioner and Jesus wasn’t happy with them (Lu 9:54). “That’s not my spirit,” he said. Paul is saying the same thing. We are not to be in the vengeance business. That’s God’s business.

An example may help. Jesus didn’t come to punish the Roman oppressors of Israel, but by surrendering to the Father’s will he participated in an endgame solution that dealt a death blow to the very heart of Roman sin. When we lash out we reveal Cain, but when we turn the other cheek we reveal Jesus who was vindicated by his Father. Because of Jesus every Roman oppressor, fraud, and bad guy, has an opportunity to walk away from the sin that bound them. But if they reject grace they will reap what they have sown – just not from our hand.

Hi Paul, I am a frequent visitor to your site and I am glad you have commented on 1 Thessalonians 4:6 cause it has caused some trouble for me. You say God is not a punisher but an avenger. I have always thought an avenger means someone who takes revenge on another for wrong doing. Even though I am a Christian in Christ I am certainly still growing in Christ and still able to do some dumb stuff in the flesh such as attempting to seduce another man’s wife, I certainly regret it afterwards and I know that thankfully I am forgiven. But the question is should I be looking out for God to avenge that terrible act that I committed?

We ALL do dumb stuff in the flesh and if God was in the punishment business he’d be busy indeed. But on account of Jesus you are eternally unpunishable. All your sins were dealt with at the cross. I suspect you are working with an old covenant definition of avenge if you think God is out to get you. As I say above, to avenge means God is in the business of making things right, not punishing his errant children.

Well said… We can’t possibly believe that God has anything to do with punishment, because that brings fear. 1 John 4:18 – There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear. For fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.

Thanks for this wonderful resource! I enjoy reading the NIV on work days and then on the weekend spend a little chunk of time perusing your site for clarification on specific verses. I’m very grateful! 1 Thessalonians 4:6 had me a little stumped too 🙂

Hi Sir Paul, I was thinking about Malachi 3, wanna know broader understanding about it in the light of Grace. It was preached by our pastor yesterday, and I totally disagree by what he preached. I was about to ask him about it but we’re not given a chance to talk face to face.
Thank you.

sir please explain 7 last words of jesus on the cross…. i have heard many preachings on that but those were just self created doctrines…. so please help us to know all those precious words of our Lord Jesus.

Paul, would you post something about Luke 9:26 “Whoever is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of them when he comes in his glory and in the glory of the Father and of the holy angels.”? Does that mean people who are a little more shy or have more difficult in sharing the gospel with other people are in trouble? What does it really mean to be “ashamed” of Jesus?

Hi Paul, have you thought about writing on 2 Tim 4:3-4? It’s been troubling me in some ways in order to really settle into the “Hyper Grace” teaching for fear that I am just wanting to satisfy what my “itching ears” want to hear. If you could point me in any direction, even externally from your blog, to reconcile Hyper Grace and this passage, that would be greatly appreciated!

I hear this a lot too – hyper-grace being dismissed as ear-tickling preaching. Which is kind of funny since Paul has just admonished Timothy to “be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus” and finishes his short letter with “Grace be with you.” Paul brackets everything he writes with grace. Ear-tickling teaching is any message that leads us away from relying on God’s grace and trusting in dead works.

Hi Paul, I appreciate the response. I agree with you that Paul always saturates his letters with grace. However, as much as I want to believe your interpretation of ear-tickling, I don’t know if it’s the correct exegesis of that passage IMO. This isn’t a knock on you; I want to work through this and I genuinely value your response(s).

I fully believe in the Hyper Grace message. Jesus continues to change my life through it. So grateful. But, when Paul says how ear-itchers “will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions” and that they will turn away from the truth, it sounds more like people (myself included) who want to hear “grace, grace, grace.” I turn to Joseph Prince, your blog, Steve McVey (recently), and others like Graham Cooke. It makes me wonder if I’m looking to have my ears tickled. Paul even mentions how sound teaching includes “rebuking,” which I don’t understand how to reconcile with Hyper Grace.

What do you think “myths” (v. 4) is referring to? Is Paul wanting Timothy to be aware of this false way for the sake of unbelievers (imp. from v. 5) more than believers?

I cringe as I question Pure Grace teaching b/c it doesn’t seem in line with the heart of Jesus to swing to the other side of the pendulum to desert the Good News (as we know it). I just want to be able to stand firm without wavering or questioning Hyper Grace. Thanks!

Well if it makes you happy, I’ll rebuke you for being slow of heart to fully believe this good news and for suggesting that Jesus preached two gospels. Seriously, I have plenty of opportunities to rebuke people who prefer the dead works of dead religion to the gift of free grace. I also have opportunities to rebuke those who foolishly believe grace is a license to stick their fingers in the sin socket.

When you first heard the undiluted gospel of grace, that feeling you had was not a tickled ear but a happy, responsive spirit. Joy, in other words. Don’t dismiss it, for that is a fruit of grace, a sign to make you wonder.

The natural man has no time for this hypergrace message. He doesn’t want to hear that his good works count for nothing. He wants principles for living and keys to success that he can implement as he works his way up the ladder of self-improvement. He thinks that if he does the right things and makes the right decisions he’ll create the right life. But that’s a myth for ticklish ears.

Hi Paul, thanks for the explanation for 1 thessalonians 4:6,it’s a super relieve , but may I know what’s your take on 1 thessalonians 4:8, if we reject the sexual teaching which is from God, who gives us His Holy Spirit, does it mean we reject His salvation and be unsaved? , since the Holy Spirit is given for as a sign for our inheritance in heaven if we reject this teaching, can we be unsaved? I was perplexed as one of the pastor challenge us with this verse, appreciate your encouraging response in this, thanks mate

In 1 Thess 4:8 Paul is saying that his instructions are the will of God. “It is God’s will that you should be sanctified: that you should avoid sexual immorality” (v.3). So if you ignore the instructions, you are acting contrary to God’s will. He is not saying God will stop loving you, cut you off, or send you to hell.

All sin is contrary to God’s will. He’s your loving Father and he does not want to see you destroy yourself and others by sowing to the flesh. Perhaps there are some who might teach that sexual immorality is okay, or that grace gives us a license to sin. This scripture refutes such an ignorant teaching. Sin is dangerous, like juggling hand grenades. It has no place in the abundant life that Christ gives us.

Hi Paul, I had a read in your book “Hyper Grace” regarding 1 Corinthians 3:16-17, however you did not quote the part where Paul says, “If anybody destroys God’s temple, God will destroy him”. What is your view on this piece of scripture in light of God’s grace?
Blessings,
Jack

“Do you not know that you are a temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are” (1 Cor 3:16-17). Paul is not saying God kills murderers or soldiers. The word for destroy means defile. Under the old covenant, defiling the temple was a serious sin. Indeed, Paul had some personal experience of this when he was falsely accused of bringing Gentiles into the temple in Acts 21:27-28. He was nearly killed for this alleged sin.

The old law was a shadow of a new covenant reality. The temple – you – is holy, and God takes a dim view of those who would try to defile you by causing you to pursue dead works, fall from grace, and cut yourself off from Christ. What happens to such people (ie: false teachers who seek to harm the church)? Jesus tells us plainly in Matthew 7:21-23 just as Peter does in 2 Peter 2.

Thanks. I looked at that scripture again because I couldn’t see the problem. I still can’t. The Lord is prophesying that bad things are going to happen; he’s not saying he’s going to rip babies out of wombs. The wages of sin is death. Sow to the wind and you’ll reap the whirlwind. It reminds me of Jesus prophesying destruction over Jerusalem. Because Jesus saw it coming, everyone thinks he did it. Which is nuts.

Sorry for side tracking your question.
I’m struggling to harmonize God the Father Jesus introduced, with God the judge Israel knew. Israel where offended and confused by God the son, and I think I am confused and offended by God who is angry, wrathful and retributive to the point of drowning, killing men women and their babies for sins common to us all.
I have decided to believe (in the absence of knowledge) that God the judge never acts out of anger, revenge, hate, or jealousy despite the written Word to the contrary. This causes me a far bit of tension because of how I previously viewed people who took such a low view of scripture.

Hi Jack, for me the bigger question is “what do we do with any(all) scripture that has God speaking words of vengeance, wrath, anger or genocide”.
Jesus did say that men of old got things wrong when speaking on God behalf. . . They misrepresented the true nature of God. They wrote what they heard filtering through their imagination, their bias and their racism. They were just like us, they made God in their own image, so they imagined an angry vengeful god who shared all the same thoughts they did.
Jesus said he was the exact representation of God, and then demonstrated loving his enemy loving those who aren’t perfect., forgiving those who do you wrong.
Jesus changed everything.
As a rule, if I can’t see Jesus doing it then God didn’t do it.(,say it, order it)
Satan kills steals and destroys, does that make it clearer? Jesus came to clearly define his Father and Satan, but still we prefer a God who looks like he gets angry and genicidal.

Thanks a lot for your reply, that’s very kind of you to take the time to do that! 🙂

I understand what you are saying, however I struggle to wrap my mind around it sometimes. I truly believe Jesus is the revelation of God, but under the law there were certain judgements and punishments that came through the law. I.e if Israel sinned, God would punish them?

Jesus does reveal the true nature of God, something the law could never do. However because of the law, Gods wrath came alive to sin? Therefore if people sinned, God responded with judgement?

I’m still not quite sure how it all works if I’m honest, im seeking God and desire to know him so much. However these scriptures really confuse me sometimes and leave me questioning a lot!

We’re both in the same boat as 1000 generations before us. . . still asking the question “what is the true nature of God”
I’m not trying to diminish the nature of God when I say he doesn’t kill steal or destroy.
I can see from Jesus example that in the absence of an accuser “neither does he accuse”
. . . But there is an accuser, and he points to men’s faults and demands a judgement.
God put in place “legal” mechanisms (covenants, sacrifice, tabernacle system) to save Israel from judgement, temporarily.
And then Jesus to save all men forever. . .if we will receive his provision.
Jesus said,”you’ll be judged as you judge, stop judging you can’t handle judgements”, “let him who is without sin judge(cast stones)”
Men have misunderstood judgements as part of God’s wrath and anger. But judges are not angry, they are totally indifferent, real judges don’t favour their relatives, nor are they angry against their families enemies.

I believe Israel’s problem was that they had judged themselves better than the inhabitants of the promised land.
They measured out judgements and the same judgements were measured against them.

Our Father provided a way for men to stand before the judge and be saved from judgement.
It’s by the blood of the lamb and our testimony.

Thank your Richard 🙂 I really appreciate you taking the time to write that and help me out. I will keep seeking God and focusing on Christ. I hope we both come to a further understand of the nature of God revealed in Christ so that we can better represent Him to the world around us. Bless you brother

Hi all was wondering if anyone could explain 2 Thess 2: 11-12
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Surely such a difficult text merits an article 😉
Many thanks in advance
Luke

Definitely a difficult text, too — especially with the mainstream explanations not really being helpful!

When I looked up the Greek word for “sent” on BibleHub, an alternate meaning is “permit to go”. It’s a common Hebrew idiom for a phrase to say “God did X” when it really means “God allows X to happen”. [Apologetics Press]

I prefer the translation “permit to go” as it fits the context — people reject truth, and lies just come in naturally. It’s also similar to Romans 1 — people walk away from God, and God lets them go.

I firmly believe that God is holy, just, and truth [John 14, 1 John 2:21] — it’s not holy or just for God to use pawns to do unholy, unjust, and untruthful actions.

Thanks Paul for all your work. I have been looking for a grace commentary (There is a group called Free Grace that has one The Grace New Testament Commentary, however, it is a cessationist commentary) and I haven’t found a complete one yet but your scripture reference index is amazing. If you ever decided to take all of your commentaries and put it in a book form I would be the first in line. I personally have been re-evaluating grace in this season of my life. I appreciate all that you do and the patience you show with all the questions.

Hey Paul, I enjoy reading your articles. Could you please do something for Psalms 5 verses 4-6. I see a lot of Christians use this saying God hates sinners and such. I just would like to read your thoughts on it.

The short answer is that this is referring to metonymy (refers to something else). Recall that everyone has (or used to) have a thing called the “flesh”. Before we have Christ, this is all we have, and it just sins and sins. But when we accept Jesus, we “died” since the old is gone [Col 3:3, 2 Cor 5:17]. In other words, the flesh is canned and in comes the Holy Spirit.

When God says that he “hates the wicked”, he hates the flesh because our flesh is responsible for all our sin. This does not mean that God hates the creation. God loves us and wants us to be free from our own flesh. That’s why Paul (both apostle and Ellis) talks about how we died with Christ, meaning that the bad part is gone, allowing us to connect with God and go to heaven.

Besides, Jesus demonstrated his love to sinners by dying on the cross! [Rom 5:8]

Hi Paul, I’m not sure if you have a specific place to post questions on scriptures (I apologize if you do, I couldn’t find it). But I was wondering if the law that the Galatians were placing themselves under also included the law of animal sacrifices for the covering of sins. Thanks in advance, Paul.

Thanks so much for this platform sir. Was checking out for Jude 1:20 as it is a verse widely used to support speaking in tongues as “praying in the Holy Ghost”. Please help shed some light on this. God bless your ministry.