Adequacy of the Search: "The Court is satisfied from [defendant's] description of the filing systems searched and the search methods employed that the Criminal Division conducted a search reasonably calculated to locate responsive records." Defendant searched the offices identified by the plaintiff utilizing four variations of the plaintiff's name. Defendant explained, "[e]ach section 'would have [searched its] own Automated Case Tracking System' . . . which 'is a comprehensive electronic database that stores records [as far back as 1978] related to investigations conducted by attorneys throughout [the Criminal Division].'"

Exemption 5/Attorney Work-Product Privilege: The court finds that the Executive Office for United States Attorneys properly asserted Exemption 5 and the attorney work-product privilege to withhold in full 23 pages referred to it. The records are described as "'documents . . . assembled by, or at the direction of, an attorney . . . made in the course of an investigation and in anticipation of one or more prosecutions.'"