More specifically, to this part of the page:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-image-property
On Apr 19, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Brad Kemper wrote:
> Yes. Sorry. That is where I meant.
>
>
> On Apr 19, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
> wrote:
>
>> I can find a red numbered list and the cited text here :
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/
>>
>> Philip TAYLOR
>> --------
>> David Woolley wrote:
>>> Brad Kemper wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 13, 2009, at 4:10 PM, fantasai wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've posted a summary of the major open issues we've been
>>>>> discussing
>>>>> here on css3.info: http://www.css3.info/border-image-issues/
>>>>>
>>>> I had a few more thoughts about the numbered red list on that page:
>>> There is no red list and I cannot find the quotes by context.
>>> If there were a list that was best identified by its colour, the
>>> document would have accessibility issues.
>>>> â€¢ If there is a border image, the â€˜border-styleâ€™ is ignored
>>>> (i.e., drawn as if it were â€˜noneâ€™)
>>