But ever since I saw Megan Fox, I’ve wanted to hunt her down and club her like a cavewoman.

Let me clarify.

I don’t really want to club her like a cavewoman…that sounds misogynistic and weird. What I mean is I want to club her like a caveman who bonked sexy cavewomen over the head and dragged them by the hair back to their caves.

Seriously, where the f*** does she get off looking like that?

Anyways, she’s said some pretty interesting things lately like wanting to strangle a mountain-ox with her bare hands because certain women were so darned appealing to her…

This is good for at least two reasons and especially because, I’m guessing she’ll totally understand the good-natured club to the dome.

When asked how she would stop the ruthless Megatron from demolishing the world, Fox first said that she would “barter with him.” She then, however, went on to say, “… and instead of the entire planet, can you just take out all of the white trash, hillbilly, anti-gay, super bible-beating people in Middle America?”

Ugh. You can try to make me hate you Megan, but it’s gonna take a lot more than that.

This yesterday morning, America woke up to aninspiringpress conference with Obama, his teleprompter, and the likely next Supreme Court Justice, Sonia Sotomayor.

Most liberals were thrilled when they saw her name. Not because they necessarily knew her, but because they were totally pumped when they deduced that she must be a female and an ethnic one. They were even more psyched when they found out she wasn’t some Uncle Tom when the blogs reported that she had said:

That type of prejudice and stereotyping is right in the deranged liberal wheelhouse, but unfortunately it’s unconstitutional and it reeks of judicial activism. Of course this fits directly into Obama’s own radical viewpoint and was easily predicted if only you paid attention to what he’s said:

People who are speculating about whether the next nominee will be a woman, a Hispanic or whatever, are missing the point. That we are discussing the next Supreme Court justice in terms of group “representation” is a sign of how far we have already strayed from the purpose of law and the weighty responsibility of appointing someone to sit for life on the highest court in the land.

Would you want to go into court to appear before a judge with “empathy” for groups A, B and C, if you were a member of groups X, Y or Z? Nothing could be further from the rule of law. That would be bad news, even in a traffic court, much less in a court that has the last word on your rights under the Constitution of the United States.

Appoint enough Supreme Court justices with “empathy” for particular groups and you would have, for all practical purposes, repealed the 14th Amendment, which guarantees “equal protection of the laws” for all America.

We would have entered a strange new world, where everybody is equal but some are more equal than others. The very idea of the rule of law would become meaningless when it is replaced by the empathies of judges

Barack Obama solves this contradiction, as he solves so many other problems, with rhetoric. If you believe in the rule of law, he will say the words “rule of law.” And if you are willing to buy it, he will keep on selling it.

Those people who just accept soothing words from politicians they like are gambling with the future of a nation. If you were German, would you be in favor of a law “to relieve the distress of the German people and nation”? That was the law that gave Hitler dictatorial power.

Less than 18 months ago, Sasha Lessin and Janet Kira Lessin gathered before their friends near their home in Maui, and proclaimed their love for one another. Nothing unusual about that—Sasha, 68, and Janet, 55—were legally married in 2000. Rather, this public commitment ceremony was designed to also bind them to Shivaya, their new 60-something “husband.” Says Sasha: “I want to walk down the street hand in hand in hand in hand and live together openly and proclaim our relationship. But also to have all those survivor and visitation rights and tax breaks and everything like that.”The Lessins’ advocacy group, the Maui-based World Polyamory Association, is pushing for the next frontier of less-traditional codified relationships. This community has even come up with a name for what the rest of the world generally would call a committed threesome: the “triad.” Unlike open marriages and the swinger days of the 1960s and 1970s, these unions are not about sex with multiple outside partners. Nor are they relationships where one person is involved with two others, who are not involved with each other, a la actress Tilda Swinton. That’s closer to bigamy. Instead, triads—”triangular triads,” to use precise polyamorous jargon—demand that all three parties have full relationships, including sexual, with each other.

Look, this is an interesting point that really brings the controversial issue of same-sex marriage right into my home, because I’ve always wanted to walk down the aisle with two women who love each other. And quite honestly, it’s pretty obvious that I was born this way.

He claims to have sex twice in the morning, and seven times in the evening, making us wonder why he didn’t choose the martyrdom path, which would have eternally bestowed upon him, 72 brown-eyed hunnies!

Daad divorces his wives when they are no longer fertile, which is better than killing them.

“I dont remember all the names of the kids actually but whenever I see the kid I do my best to remember the name, he added.”

Since they’re all probably named Muhammad, he’s likely kidding. No pun intended!

Watch out John Edwards! Your, ‘father of the year’ award is in peril!

Sadly, Daad is only allowed four wives at one time under the UAEs polygamy rules, he says that that is not enough.

“Four is not even enough. If there is a way to have more than four then Ill go for it,” he said.

Daad wasn’t asked, but he presumably agrees with redefining marriage laws in the west, and then stoning all the gays.

Anybody else noticing a theme emerging here, that Democrat voters, by and large, have no idea why they’re Dems except for that they know they hate Republicans? They’re so deeply embedded in liberal zombieland, that their response to our charge of their generic cluelessness would be that, “Republicans don’t know why they’re Republicans except for that they know they hate gays, blacks, all foreigners, and they wake up at 6am to screw us over.”

Look, I may be exceptionally hard on the current state of Liberalism, but besides Democrat party orchestrators and the media, I give the vast majority of liberals, the total benefit of doubt with regard to their intentions.

Why is this respect not mutual? I believe it serves the same purpose that anti Japanese propaganda provided during WW2. Dehumanization of Republicans. Open minded consideration of conservative ideas and basic observations about life, tends to lead folks to conservatism. Striving to eliminate the chance a person will even be able to entertain a non-liberal idea, the Democrats have concocted a cyclone of victim politics which literally excuses rage while providing a common enemy to blame it on. Cookie-cutter this pathos to every public school and to every TV show and movie; in every publication and then in all higher learning centers where your intellectuals are; and as they say, “it goes viral.”

This is the only way in which so many people, the majority of the nation in fact, could have become so entirely dismissive and prejudiced towards the political party which espouses a majority of their own views?

But acknowledging America’s historic injustice and debt to blacks doesn’t mean that whatever policy such acknowledgment leads to will necessarily help them…The second way in which race-based affirmative action injures blacks is that it perpetuates the racist myth that race is significant. The notion that racial diversity is important is itself based on this racist idea. It confuses cultural diversity — a great asset to a university — with racial diversity. It tells the black student that the rest of us regard him first and foremost as black. Third, affirmative action tells blacks that America is so racist that they cannot achieve anything significant without having rules bent on their behalf. This is a libel on America, and it is utterly dispiriting to blacks.

In a world where everyone’s dressed in a tuxedo, it gets hard to brag about your fashion sense and find ways to celebrate diversity. Lifelong mating penguins or “breeders,” as they’re called by gay penguins, may seem to be indistinguishable from the rest of the pengie community, but experts suggest that, while they may look exactly alike on the outside, they’re all different on the inside. These differences are allegedly behind a rise in crime as gay penguins are stealing their neighbors eggs and leaving expecting parents with cold rocks. Straight penguins allege gay penguins are flapping a flipper in Darwin’s eye and creating unrest in the community. Gay penguins ignored the charges and are said to simply want the G-D given right to “equality and those adorable baby penguins.”