You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (98.223.133.1) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! ke4roh (talk) 00:39, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kidnapping of Jaycee Lee Dugard, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sorry, this is too close in content to [1] not to be regarded as plagiarism, but feel free to summarize, using that site as a source.Hengist Pod (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have reverted your addition of a copy and pasted press release into an article for a number of reasons. First of all, this may represent a copy right violation. Second, the length of the added material is way out of proportion to the the importance of this particular finding to the over all subject of the mu Opioid receptor. Finally Wikipedia articles should simply state facts and not hype who or where the study was conducted. Press releases are by definition primarily hype. Boghog (talk) 04:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

I included those details for valid reasons. The study was funded and conducted by those institutions. You are allowed to cite tracts of a study with potential medical relevance only if you acknowledge the organizations and individuals who carried it out, that cannot be considered the same as advertising a corporation or institution. It was necessary to include the depth of information that I did because it is part of the scientific explanation behind the research, and one would have to know which parts of the study are unimportant and which are not before they decide what to leave and what must be mentioned. The fact that I cited the writer, the date it was posted, the principal investigator and his title, and the date the study was carried out and the institutions involved, plus a web link, should be more than sufficient to shield me from those concerns- I included quotations around every portion of it and mentioned it was a press release, clearly it was not stated as my own work.

Potential copyright infringement was the least of my concerns. Material added to this article should focus on what the study says about the mu opioid receptor, not what the mu opioid receptor says about Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. I don't have access to the full paper, but based on the papers abstract, I have added a short section on morphine-induced scratching to the article that summarizes the conclusions of the study. Boghog (talk) 06:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm sorry, I just wasn't sure what to include and what not to.

Your addition to Elizabeth Johnson (theologian) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Imzadi 1979→ 02:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (98.223.133.1) is used to identify you instead.

Hi - unuaslly such minor relationships and tabliod additions like your last edit are not considered to be encyclopedic notworthy additions - this is not a celebrity magazine - please open a discussion on the talkpage Talk:Pippa Middleton if your desire to add such content thanks - Off2riorob (talk) 15:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

HI. I tweaked the text for Archbishop Donoghue in accordance with WP:BLP and WP:MOS. Excessive title styling rv as this is not an ecclesial publication. Also, promotional text rv as this is not an obituary site. Yours. Quis separabit? 20:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your edits to update Wikipedia articles based on news articles (i.e. Schriever Air Force Base or Kaliningrad Oblast). It is important to keep the articles updated. However, please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a news service. The stories, unless extremely notable, should be shortened to one or two sentences. That would not only avoid copyright infringement (copying even small amounts of text is a big no-no in Wikipedia), but also make sure that Wikipedia articles remain encyclopedic and not overrun with tedious day-to-day news reports. Think about it this way: say, the article on Schriever Air Force Base should cover 20+ years of its operations, so adding 250 words on an unremarkable incident is undue weight to recent events. Those one or two sentences should be referenced, giving the reading the ability to follow the links and find more information about the incident, if they so desire. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing! Renata (talk) 15:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.