With all the groundbreaking findings published in the news, the media are having a hard time deciding what to tackle next: Kids’ thoughts on cake and candy, men’s thoughts on T & A (their cake and candy), or Mel Gibson’s thoughts on Jews.

Here are a few actual examples of recent news pieces:

“Millions face famine in Niger.”

“Dieticians recommend more whole grains.”

“Going back to work not as fun as going on vacation.”

“Is a college education worth it? College professors say yes.”

“College students prefer professors who are easy graders and don't expect a lot of them.”

Society sources its information from widely respected major news organizations such as CNN, which tells us about a new study, revealing that millions go hungry in Niger. Really?

Of course, there’s also the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation with gems such as the in-depth analysis of what Lindsay Lohan wore when she surrendered herself for her jail term.

(And it wasn’t just a story printed online, it was a lengthy anchor-correspondent chat about everything Lindsay. The only thing missing in that piece was a quote from Perez Hilton. Thankfully, TMZ was referenced.)

This is not to disregard the ongoing famine and hardships faced by those in Africa – it is however to disregard the ongoing hardships of “fame” faced by Lohan.

Marshall McLuhan: When the medium was the message

Mostly, this is simply to show that the medium is no longer the message.

It is the machine.

And the machine is now the message.

As a freelance journalist, I try to bring the message back to the medium, by breaking away from this machine. Still, I am faced with another problem. Though I am a journalist, I am but a “blogger.”

To be clear, not all bloggers consider themselves journalists.

But, I went to school for journalism. I have two higher education degrees. I’ve worked in the mainstream media as a writer, reporter, and producer.

I didn’t call myself an offline journalist then, so why would I call myself an online journalist now? I am a journalist.

Recently, a broadcaster on a popular Toronto sports radio show discredited “bloggers.” He claimed they use mainstream media as their information-feeder, simply regurgitating that which the traditional media says.

And I suppose when mainstream media gets its news from the Associated Press or Canadian Press, those sources are considered first accounts?

There are indeed journalists who regurgitate information, but they are not limited to bloggers.

Anyone watch the six o’clock news? Two different networks – even from two different countries – often run pretty much the same newscast.

What about media conglomerates who feed information from one of their own outlets to another? Isn’t that the same thing?

Today, with the pressure for faster and more easily distributed news and media, Twitter is tweeting over the voices of traditional channels of information. This has removed some power from the hands of big-business agencies.

But, in an effort to compete, new school and old school media outlets now must strive to be the first to post a story.

The result? “Truth” is often defined as - and subjugated to - that which is exposed first.

Over time this should change, as we come to understand sources that are not fully credible. Inevitably, in the push to be first there will be many mistakes made, and some media will choose accuracy over speed.

But, there is still danger in the most trusted names, as their news is accepted as gospel and often not subjected to further verification.

(Remember in 2000, when the four major American news networks, along with CNN and the AP, first called Florida for Gore, then retracted the projection, and then called Florida for Bush, before finally retracting that projection as well. Possibly altering history... but no biggie.)

Marshall McLuhan thought the modern media should be an extension of human senses, and expand society’s ability to view the world in ways that could not be achieved without the media.

One thing that drives me up the wall is that desire to be first with breaking news. As far as I'm concerned, with news information, it's better to be accurate than first.

And here's another thing: Have you noticed how now EVERYTHING is breaking news? When I was a kid a breaking news story would be, for example, the Challenger blowing up. Now, breaking news could be as small as a fender bender on the 401 during rush hour.

i know... if lindsay lohan can be breaking news, a fender bender is serious breaking news - comparatively.

and by telling us it is breaking news, we learn to understand everything as breaking news and of course - important and crucial to our very existence perhaps. euh...

so yes, i do agree with you. thanks for the comment, eric.

Reply

Eric

8/11/2010 04:31:22

NP. Although I'm a bit of a hypocrite since I wrote about Lohan a few weeks ago, haha

Reply

Jonathan strumms.

8/11/2010 05:28:08

"Here is the news" a song ahead of its "time" from an album called "time" from a band called "elo"...it refers to the future of what will become of "news"and how nothing will really mean anything anymore...read the lyric...poignant, significant and well written song...and thus, that is why your blog was music to my ears! √