“GERD” Symptoms May Indicate Stomach Or Esophageal Cancer - New Guidelines On When Physicians Should Order An Endoscopy Following Heartburn

We see the same tragic situation several times a year: a patient, often
a young person in their twenties or thirties, goes to their primary care
physician with the signs and symptoms of "GERD," or gastroesophageal
reflux disease. They have persistent heartburn that seems to resist antacids,
giving them pain in their throat and chest, maybe even a dry cough or
trouble swallowing. Their doctor prescribes a proton-pump inhibitor -
maybe Nexium, or Prevacid, or Prilosec - and then sends them on their
way with instructions for them to follow-up in a couple weeks.

The heartburn drug works a little bit, but doesn't resolve the problem
entirely. The patient goes back to the doctor two or three months later,
and the doctor tells them to keep taking the pill, and reminds them to
quit smoking, quit drinking alcohol, or get more sleep, or improve their
diet. The patient starts just living with the pain and discomfort, and
adding a couple antacids before and after their meals, too, and asking
their family physician what to do. The doctor tells them they should avoid
overeating, shouldn't go to bed with a full stomach, shouldn't
eat onions or drink caffeine, and should raise their pillow.
All the usual stuff.

After many more months, maybe more than a year, much more worrying symptoms
appear - nausea, severe fatigue, blood in the stool, or throwing up blood.
That's when the patient starts to get worried, and then either gets
their doctor to finally order some follow-up diagnostic tests (often just
blood work, or maybe a colonoscopy) or ends up in the Emergency Room wondering
what's going on. Those other doctors, the ones at the imaging facility
or in the emergency department at the hospital, tell the patient what's
happening: cancer. The next day the patient gets a CT Scan or an MRI,
and one of two things are confirmed: stomach cancer or esophageal cancer.
And it's often inoperable by that point.

There's a little secret buried deep in the "prescribing information"
given to physicians with those proton-pump inhibitors, information they're
supposed to know but often don't: those drugs aren't meant to
be used if you have signs of a serious condition, and they aren't
supposed to be used for more than a couple weeks at a time.

NEXIUM is indicated for the short-term treatment (4 to 8 weeks) in the
healing and symptomatic resolution of diagnostically confirmed erosive
esophagitis. For those patients who have not healed after 4 to 8 weeks
of treatment, an additional 4 to 8 week course of NEXIUM may be considered. …

Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

NEXIUM is indicated for short-term treatment (4 to 8 weeks) of heartburn
and other symptoms associated with GERD in adults and children 1 year or older.

The efficacy of PRILOSEC used for longer than 8 weeks in these patients
has not been established. If a patient does not respond to 8 weeks of
treatment, an additional 4 weeks of treatment may be given. If there is
recurrence of erosive esophagitis or GERD symptoms (eg, heartburn), additional
4-8 week courses of omeprazole may be considered.

PREVACID is indicated for the treatment of heartburn and other symptoms
associated with GERD.

Short-Term Treatment of Erosive Esophagitis

PREVACID is indicated for short-term treatment (up to 8 weeks) for healing
and symptom relief of all grades of erosive esophagitis.

For patients who do not heal with PREVACID for 8 weeks (5 to 10%), it may
be helpful to give an additional 8 weeks of treatment. If there is a recurrence
of erosive esophagitis an additional 8-week course of PREVACID may be
considered.

Notice the key term there: "short-term treatment." Doctors are supposed to prescribe the medications for 4-8 weeks,
evaluate how well they're working, and then prescribe them for at
most another 8 weeks. Nobody is supposed to be on any of these proton
pump inhibitors for more than four months at the very most, and then only
while a doctor is evaluating them. (H2 receptor antagonists like Zantac
are even shorter: the
warning label for Zantac says to see a doctor if "you need to take this product for more than
14 days.")

Why? For the same reasons the medications tell you not to use them "if
you have trouble or pain swallowing food, vomiting with blood, or bloody
or black stools. These may be signs of a serious condition. See your doctor."
It could be sign of gastric or esophageal cancer, or of Barrett's
esophagus, which is tied closely with esophageal adenocarcinoma, a particular
lethal cancer. Like with all cancers and precancerous tumors, the sooner
a patient can be diagnosed and treated, the better, but that diagnosis
requires an endoscopy be done of the throat and stomach.

For years, there has been frustratingly been debate in the medical community
over when a doctor should tell a patient with signs of GERD to undergo
upper endoscopy. Three different physician associations had completely
different guidelines, all of which were bad and which shockingly discouraged
doctors from recommending an endoscopy to patients:

The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends that screening
upper endoscopy be considered "in selected patients with chronic,
longstanding GERD." GERD several times a week, or GERD for more than
five years, or nocturnal reflux symptoms were risk factors.

The American Gastroenterological Association guidelines recommend against
screening the general population with GERD for Barrett esophagus and esophageal
adenocarcinoma but say that it should be considered in patients with GERD
who have several risk factors associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma,
like age, hiatal hernia, elevated body mass index, and intra-abdominal
distribution of fat.

The American College of Gastroenterology guidelines note that "screening
for Barrett’s esophagus in the general population cannot be recommended
at this time. The use of screening in selective populations at higher
risk remains to be established, and therefore should be individualized."

This advice was awful, and it cost lives. Frankly, it's hard not to
think that the guidelines were written that way to excuse negligent physicians
who failed to properly order tests. Thankfully, back in December 2012,
the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
published in the Annals of Internal Medicine new proposed guidelines that are far, far better than the guidelines from
the other organization:

Best Practice Advice 1: Upper endoscopy is indicated in men and women with heartburn and alarm
symptoms (dysphagia, bleeding, anemia, weight loss, and recurrent vomiting).

Best Practice Advice 2: Upper endoscopy is indicated in men and women with:

Severe erosive esophagitis after a 2-month course of proton-pump inhibitor
therapy to assess healing and rule out Barrett esophagus. Recurrent endoscopy
after this follow-up examination is not indicated in the absence of Barrett
esophagus.

History of esophageal stricture who have recurrent symptoms of dysphagia.

Best Practice Advice 3: Upper endoscopy may be indicated:

In men older than 50 years with chronic GERD symptoms (symptoms for more
than 5 years) and additional risk factors (nocturnal reflux symptoms,
hiatal hernia, elevated body mass index, tobacco use, and intra-abdominal
distribution of fat) to detect esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett esophagus.

For surveillance evaluation in men and women with a history of Barrett
esophagus. In men and women with Barrett esophagus and no dysplasia, surveillance
examinations should occur at intervals no more frequently than 3 to 5
years. More frequent intervals are indicated in patients with Barrett
esophagus and dysplasia.

(If you don't want to read the journal article,
Medscape has a summary here.) The first two examples of "best practice advice" are the most
common issues we see in our work on behalf of malpractice victims. Either
a doctor ignored an "alarm symptom" like blood in the vomit
or stool or weight loss, or the doctor kept a patient on prescribed heartburn
medication for too long even while GERD symptoms persisted.

It's our hope that these new guidelines, published in as widely-read
journal as the Annals of Internal Medicine, will help educate family physicians,
primary care physicians, and other about the warning signs of cancer that
can be masked by GERD treatments. The unfortunate truth, however, is that
negligent treatment persists among doctors long after the standard of
care moves forward, and so we expect to continue to see these tragic cases
for years to come.

Office Location

Contact Us

The information on this website is for general information purposes only.
Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual
case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt
or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Please
note: All cases are different and past results do not predict future case outcomes.

x

⚠

Your browser is out of date. To get the full experience of this website,
please update to most recent version.