Sony have made some terrible decisions recently, but I'm a bit sceptical about these predictions of doom for the company. My guess is that in a few years the PS3 will be a success, but not as much a success as the PS1 and PS2 were.

Sony have made some terrible decisions recently, but I'm a bit sceptical about these predictions of doom for the company. My guess is that in a few years the PS3 will be a success, but not as much a success as the PS1 and PS2 were.

they better drop the price, and FAST! im not talkin about 500$, make it at least 400$ (expensive, but afordable) and make one w/o a HD for 300$, (which means they will have to make ps3 memorycards)

the ps3 is the most bang for your buck, value wise, other than that really its your opinion, why do you guys create this anti-ps3 fanboy threads all the time? and im pretty sure no HD is not an option, since devs probably use cache or whatever off of the HD to help run the games faster and smoother (big mistake 360 made with having a model with no hd, thus making that option not an option)

and i would not want to see what else you say, since you are obviously bias towards nintendo........................

The way I see it, in order to get save up for a ps3 you'd need to get a JOB. Now in three months at my current job iv'e made over $1000. I've also had less time for gaming. I'm not gonna quit my job and I'm not gonna waste (although i should say spend so i dont sound biased) on something that I'll hardly ever play (besides I'm 16, I need a car). So personally, I'm gonna get a Wii probly near the end of 2007 becuz that's when all the features are supposed to be up and running and they're (supposed) to have dvd players. And you're right Sovieto, it really opinion. It's also how much you're willing to spend and how much time you have to play games.