Television

Friday, July 22, 2016

Police robots and lethal force: Who should make the decision?

The unprecedented
decision to blast Micah Xavier Johnson, who had killed five officers in one of the worst
ambushes against U.S. law enforcement in modern history, was praised as an
innovative way to eliminate a threat without risking more officers’ lives, according to the
Washington Post.

Police said they came up with the deadly plan in
20 minutes after Johnson said that “the end was coming” and negotiations with
him broke down. Their use of a robot is prompting debate about the role of
remote-controlled robots in law enforcement and whether their use to deliver
lethal force should be left to the discretion of police departments or
regulated by state or federal governments. “We’ve crossed a new frontier,
and we look out and we see an absence of law and policy,” said Peter Singer of
New America, who has written on technology, security and robotics.

That void, some worry, has the potential to lead to overuse of machines that
can be used to injure, or kill, suspects.

“Technology can change things,”
said Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union. “When things become
easier they tend to become overdone, and sometimes you need to reassess rules.”
Police officials said robots were simply another tool in the police arsenal,
and their use was already subject to strict laws and regulations about lethal
force. “Technology cannot override the legal standards governing police
use of deadly force,” said Chuck Wexler of the Police Executive Research Forum.

About Matt

An analysis of crime and punishment from the perspective of a former prosecutor and current criminal justice practitioner.
The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the opinions or postions of any county, state or federal agency.