French Report ISIL Leader Mossad Agent

Simon Elliot, aka Al-Baghdadi, son of Jewish parents, Mossad agent

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, so-called ”Caliph,” the head of ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant is, according to sources reputed to originate from Edward Snowden, an actor named Elliot Shimon, a Mossad trained operative.

Simon Elliot (Elliot Shimon) aka Al-Baghdadi was born of two Jewish parents and is a Mossad agent.

We offer below three translations that want to assert that the Caliph Al-Baghdadi is a full Mossad agent and that he was born Jewish father and mother:

The real name of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is “Simon Elliott.”

The so-called “Elliot” was recruited by the Israeli Mossad and was trained in espionage and psychological warfare against Arab and Islamic societies.

This information was attributed to Edward Snowden and published by newspapers and other Web sites: the head of the “Islamic State” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, has cooperated with the U.S. Secret Service, British and Israel to create an organization capable of attracting terrorist extremists from around the world.

Source: Radio ajyal.com

Another source corroborates this statement, the site Egy-press:

With photo support, a Iranian media discovers the true identity of the Emir Daash, a trained Zionist agent.

Iranian intelligence discovered the true and full identity of the Emir Daash, which is known under the name Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi; his real name is Elliot Shimon. Its role in Mossad secret agent in the Zionist espionage. His false name: Ibrahim ibn Awad ibn Ibrahim Al Al Badri Arradoui Hoseini.

It was premature to write off Bandar when he was relieved of his duties as
the Saudi spy chief in May. He has re-emerged as special advisor to the
king.

Public pronouncements by Saudi officials against the Islamic State of
Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), now renamed the Islamic State (IS, for short),
notwithstanding, the fact is, this monster is a Saudi creation. And it
did not emerge last week or month; the House of Saud has nurtured it for
nearly a decade as part of a long-term strategy to contain the growing
influence of Islamic Iran in the region.

The man responsible for the ISIS file, and indeed the entire Takfiri
project is none other than Bandar bin Sultan, the illegitimate son of
Sultan bin Abdul Aziz who died in 2012 after suffering a long battle
with cancer. Last April when it was announced that Bandar had been
relieved of his responsibilities as Saudi intelligence chief, it was
assumed that this was because of his failure to bring down the Bashar
al-Assad government in Syria. He re-emerged in late June in his new role
as special advisor to and envoy of the aged and ailing King Abdullah.

Bashar’s resilience and survivability have surprised many observers. It
was assumed that he would be overthrown in a matter of months if not
weeks. He has not only survived for three-and-a-half years, he also now
has a strong mandate from the people. In the June 3 presidential
elections, he garnered more than 89 percent of the vote. The choice
before the people was Bashar or the Takfiri cannibals and bloodsuckers;
they chose Bashar regardless of his many faults and weaknesses. Unless
totally consumed by hatred, nobody can deny the fact that he has broad
support among the Syrian masses, at least for now.

The Syrian army has also made steady progress against the mercenaries
that have flooded from 83 countries, according to Asad’s assertion
during a speech on July 16. They have been driven out of Homs province
and local residents have returned to their homes. In Aleppo, too, the
terrorists are under pressure and large parts of the city have been
liberated from their clutches. In a moment of candor, some of the
terrorists have admitted that they thought all that was required to
overthrow Assad was to shout ‘Allahu Akbar’ a few times and raise the
black flag. It has turned out to be a lot more difficult, in fact, well
nigh impossible under present circumstances.

Bandar’s re-emergence on the political scene, however, indicates that
the Saudi regime has not given up on Syria or on mischief making. In
fact, what recent developments in the region indicate is that the Saudis
want to up the ante by unleashing the Takfiris in Iraq, right on the
border with Iran. They may publicly say that they are worried about the
Takfiris but they are cut from the same Wahhabi cloth. The Takfiris are
the Saudis’ dream come true: ruthless, utterly unconcerned about the
sanctity of human life and more important from the Saudi point of view,
they can achieve their objectives without the Saudis having to do the
dirty work themselves.

The Takfiris’ failure in Syria has resulted in intensification of their
brutal campaign in Iraq. The Sunni tribesmen have joined them, smarting
from Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s shortsighted policies.
Additional muscle has been provided by remnants of the Ba‘athist army
that lost out in the new Iraq. The emerging scenario has all the
hallmarks of exploding into a full-scale sectarian war with frightening
consequences for the Ummah. The Saudis, however, have never cared for
the wellbeing of the Ummah as long as they can maintain their
illegitimate hold on power in the Arabian Peninsula.

The Saudi (Bandar)-hatched conspiracy to instigate Sunni-Shia conflict
was revealed by Patrick Cockburn in The Independent on July 13, 2014. He
wrote: “Some time before 9/11, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, once the
powerful Saudi ambassador in Washington and head of Saudi intelligence
until a few months ago, had a revealing and ominous conversation with
the head of the British Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, Sir Richard
Dearlove. Prince Bandar told him: ‘The time is not far off in the Middle
East, Richard, when it will be literally “God help the Shia”. More than
a billion Sunnis have simply had enough of them.’”

Sir Richard, who headed MI6 from 1999 to 2004, made the revelation
during a speech he delivered at the Royal United Services Institute in
early July and emphasized that Bandar’s words constituted “a chilling
comment that I remember very well indeed”.

Cockburn further wrote how the ISIS thugs killed Shia women and
children in villages south of Kirkuk, and machine-gunned Shia air force
cadets and buried them in mass graves near Tikrit. Mosques and shrines
frequented by Shias have also been blown up to further escalate
sectarian tensions. The Maliki government has resorted to mobilizing
Shia militias playing into the hands of the Takfiris and their Saudi
sponsors.

That the Saudis, Kuwaitis and Qataris are financing the Takfiris is
well established. Money is collected from private donors in Saudi Arabia
and in order to circumvent ‘official restrictions’ on funding such
groups, the money is sent to Kuwait. The regime there has few strictures
about financing terrorists. It is easily transferred to the various
terrorist outfits in the world.

Even leaked documents from Wikileaks confirm Saudi funding of such
groups. In one such document, then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
wrote in December 2009 in a cable released by Wikileaks that “Saudi
Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qa’ida, the
Taliban, LeT [Lashkar-e-Taiba in Pakistan] and other terrorist groups.”
Ms Clinton identified the Saudi policy of clamping down on al-Qa’ida
activities as aimed purely at containing domestic threats. Externally,
it has not only turned a blind eye but has actually encouraged and
financed it because it meets the regime’s broader objectives of creating
fitna among Muslims.

The only silver lining in this otherwise bleak picture is that many
leading ‘Sunni’ scholars have spoken out against ISIS’s declaration of
the khilafah and their brutal methods that are further tarnishing the
image of Islam. These range from middle of the road scholars to those
that would be considered extremist, such as the Salafis as well as
former al-Qa’ida operatives. Many al-Azhar graduates have also spoken
out against the Takfiris’ khilafah project although it is important to
note that al-Azhar as an institution has not formally condemned it.

The most prominent ‘Sunni’ scholar to take a stand against the ISIS is
Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. He heads the International Union of Muslim
Scholars on whose website he published an open letter stating the ISIS’s
declaration of the khilafah was “void” according to Islamic law.

“A group simply announcing a khilafah, is not enough to establish a
khilafah,” Sheikh Qaradawi wrote. Even Hizbut Tahrir, the Islamic group
that is most vocal in calling for the establishment of the khilafah, has
dismissed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s declaration. “The issue of the
Khilafah is too great for its image to be distorted or for its reality
to be changed merely by an announcement here or an announcement there,”
the group said in a statement on its website.

Rachid Ghannouchi, the Tunisian scholar and founder of An-Nahdha Party
has also lashed out at the Takfiris. He did so during a Jumah Khutbah
early last month saying the Takfiris had made a mockery of an important
Islamic institution.

The Salafis have used even stronger language. For instance the
Jordanian Salafi Abu Mohamed al-Maqdesi (real name Assem Barqawi) who
was released from a prison in Jordan called fighters loyal ISIS as
“deviant.” Al-Maqdesi was imprisoned for recruiting volunteers to fight
against US forces in Afghanistan. Worried that Takfiri cells in Jordan
would create problems for the monarchy, the regime decided to release
the Salafi preacher to counter ISIS threat. Al-Maqdesi is a supporter of
Jabhat al-Nusra that is at war with the ISIS Takfiris. In denouncing
ISIS’s brutal methods, al-Maqdesi said “Is this khilafah a sanctuary for
the vulnerable and a refuge for all Muslims, or a sword hanging over
those Muslims who disagree with them“?

Supporters of the takfiris have claimed that all these scholars are
opposing al-Baghdadi’s khilafah because they have failed to establish
one themselves and in any case, they feel their position is being
threatened. Under Islamic law, Muslims are obliged to pledge allegiance
to a khalifah. These scholars either have to do so or reject it, thereby
avoiding the obligation of allegiance.

Al-Baghdadi’s supporters fail to consider the requirements for
establishing the khilafah and qualifications for a person to become the
khalifah. The process is also important. Al-Baghdadi can at best be seen
as declaring his leadership in the same manner as the ‘mulukiyyah’ that
disrupted the system of the ‘Khulafah ar-Rashidoon.’ The kings did so
at the point of the sword; al-Baghdadi is doing it brandishing a
Kalashnikov.

In any case, if the takfiris’ argument is accepted, then one is forced
to ask, why did they not pledge allegiance to Mullah Muhammad Omar, the
reclusive Taliban leader who had also declared himself Amin al-Mumineen.
To the best of our knowledge, Mullah Omar has not repudiated that claim
even if he does not control the whole territory of Afghanistan. When
the Taliban regime of Mullah Omar first emerged in 1996, three countries
extended it recognition: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the UAE. The US
also dealt with them without extending recognition. No such argument was
advanced by anyone at the time that all Muslims must pledge allegiance
to Mullah Omar, as al-Baghdadi and his cohorts have done.

There is one other point worth mentioning. According to a well-known
hadith of the noble Messenger (saws), if there is a khalifah and another
person comes to claim it, the second person must be killed. Based on
this hadith and the fact that Mullah Omar had declared himself khalifah
nearly 20 years ago without being challenged by anyone, al-Baghdadi
should be executed for violating an important Islamic ruling.

The entire al-Baghdadi khilafah project and Saudi support for it is
meant to demean important Islamic principles and institutions in order
to put off ordinary Muslims from Islam. That is the essential policy of
the Saudis and has been from day one despite claiming to be ‘Custodians
of the Two Holy Cities.’

Wednesday, September 17, 2014
US will have ‘many more’ 9/11s if it fails to act against Islamic State – House Rep
USA – Albanian Lobbyist Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) of the House Foreign Affairs Committee expressed his support for President Barack Obama’s plan to combat IS

Published time: September 17, 2014 02:32

If the US fails to attack Islamic State (IS) militants in Iraq and Syria, the country could face the prospect of “many” terrorist attacks similar to September 11, a top-ranking Democrat says. It comes as the House debates arming Syrian rebels to fight IS.

Speaking during a floor debate at the House of Representatives on Tuesday, Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) of the House Foreign Affairs Committee expressed his support for President Barack Obama’s plan to combat IS (previously known as ISIS/ISIL) and said that failure to authorize the plan would lead to devastating consequences for the US.

“I understand that my colleagues are war weary. I’m war weary. I understand the American people are war weary,” Engel said, as quoted by The Hill. “But I think doing nothing would invite something very similar that happened to my city, New York City, on that fateful day of Sept. 11, 2001.”
“If we do nothing, ISIS (IS) will plot and plan and we’ll have many more 9/11s in the United States, in Europe, in the Middle East,” he claimed.

Military Capabilities
USAF goes into Syria prepared to meet resistance
Tim Ripley, London – IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly
25 September 2014
A still from footage released by US Central Command shows an F-16 armed with AGM-88 HARM, AIM-120 AMRAAM, and AIM-9X Sidewinder missiles as it refuels from a KC-135 Stratotanker during airstrikes against the Islamic State in Syria on 23 September 2014. Source: US Central Command

The US airstrikes carried out against Islamist militants in Syria on the night of 22-23 September were supported by aircraft that were prepared to take on Syria’s air defences, a video released by US Central Command (CENTCOM) has revealed.

The video shows USAF F-16 Fighting Falcon aircraft refuelling from a KC-135 Stratotanker during the mission. One could be seen carrying Raytheon AGM-88 High Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles (HARMs), which are used to suppress hostile air defence radars, as well as AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAMs) and AIM-9X Sidewinder short-range air-to-air missiles.

The AGM-88 is normally carried by the USAF F-16CJ aircraft, which are tasked with the suppression of enemy air defence (SEAD) role.

Another video showed US Navy Grumman EA-6B Prowler SEAD aircraft being prepared for launch on the deck of the carrier USS George H W Bush in the north of the Gulf to accompany F/A-18 Hornet aircraft on strikes against targets inside Syria.

The Syrian government said it had been warned that US aircraft would be entering its airspace to carry out airstrikes against the militants.

US Department of Defense (DoD) spokesman Rear Admiral John Kirby confirmed on 23 September that the US ambassador to the UN had informed Damascus about the strikes, but stressed that the US military had not co-ordinated or communicated with its Syrian counterpart.

Asked at that press conference about the posture of Syria’s air defences, Lieutenant General William Mayville, the director of operations for the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, said: „I won’t get into specifically what we know they did, but I think it would be fair to say [they only used] passive radar [last night].“

Lt Gen Mayville said the operation involved three waves of missiles and aircraft against targets across eastern, northern, and northwest Syria. The first wave consisted of more than 40 BGM-109 Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles fired from the USS Arleigh Burke in the Red Sea and the USS Philippine Sea in the northern Arabian Gulf against three groups of targets near Aleppo, Al-Raqqah, and Dayr al-Zawr respectively.

A final wave of US Navy F/A-18 and USAF F-16s then hit multiple Islamic State targets along Syria’s eastern border with Iraq. Aircraft from four Arab air forces were involved in this strike.

According to government announcements and diplomatic sources, this including four Royal Saudi Air Force Panavia Tornado IDS, three Royal Bahraini Air Force F-16s, four Royal Jordanian Air Force F-16s, and four unidentified strike aircraft from the United Arab Emirates Air Force. Qatar played a supporting role, according to R Adm Kirby.

The third wave included an attack on an IS training site near Abu Kamal on the Iraqi border using „multiple GPS-guided munitions fired from F-18s“, Lt Gen Mayville said. Video of the attack showed more than a dozen munitions hitting the target area in the space of five seconds.

„The time is not far off in the Middle East, Richard, when it will be
literally ‚God help the Shia‘. More than a billion Sunnis have simply
had enough of them.“

In some areas, being Shia is akin to being a Jew in Nazi Germany

Ex-MI6 Sir Richard Dearlove

„He does not doubt that substantial and sustained funding from
private donors in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, to which the authorities
may have turned a blind eye, has played a central role in the Isis
surge into Sunni areas of Iraq. He said: „Such things simply do not
happen spontaneously.“ This sounds realistic since the tribal and
communal leadership in Sunni majority provinces is much beholden to
Saudi and Gulf paymasters, and would be unlikely to cooperate with
Isis without their consent.“

“Thank God for the Saudis and Prince Bandar,” John McCain told CNN’s
Candy Crowley in January 2014. “Thank God for the Saudis and Prince
Bandar, and for our Qatari friends,” the senator said once again a
month later, at the Munich Security Conference.

But shortly after McCain’s Munich comments, Saudi Arabia’s King
Abdullah relieved Bandar of his Syrian covert-action portfolio, which
was then transferred to Saudi Interior Minister Prince Mohammed bin
Nayef.“

Amis und Saudis arbeiten zusammen.

„Qatar’s military and economic largesse has made its way to Jabhat
al-Nusra, to the point that a senior Qatari official told me he can
identify al-Nusra commanders by the blocks they control in various
Syrian cities. But ISIS is another matter. As one senior Qatari
official stated, “ISIS has been a Saudi project.”“

Baghdadi’s Wife and Son Detained in Lebanon at Checkpoint
Part of channel(s): Syria (current event)

Suja al-Dulaymi, who is one of the wives of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the terror group Islamic State (IS, aka ISIL or ISIS), was detained with her 8-year-old son at a checkpoint in northern Lebanon 10 days ago. The Lebanese authorities also detained in Tripoli the wife of a leader in the al-Qaeda affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra, who goes by the alias of Abu Ali al-Shishani.

Father of Captured Jordanian Pilot Pleads with ISIS: Treat Him as a ‘Guest’
Part of channel(s): Iraq (current event), Syria (current event)

The father of a Jordanian pilot captured Wednesday by the Sunni militants ISIS pleaded with the terrorist group to treat his son as a “guest.”

“I do not want to describe him as a hostage. I call him a guest,” Saif al-Kasaesbeh. “He is a guest among brothers of ours in Syria Islamic State. I ask them – by the name of God and with the dignity of the prophet Mohammed, peace be upon him – to receive him as a guest of his hosts and treat him well.”

27-year-old Muath al-Kasaesbeh was captured by ISIS after his plane was shot down yesterday, creating worries among the coalition of nations fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Control of the skies had been one of the coalitions primary strengths, one complicated if ISIS had surface-to-air missiles.

But the U.S. military quickly disputed that ISIS had shot the plane down. “Evidence clearly indicates that ISIL did not down the aircraft as the terrorist organization is claiming,” U.S. Central Command stressed.

Al-Kasaesbeh is the first enemy fighter captured by the militants, who have made a ghoulish habit out of beheading their western journalist hostages. [Click to view image: ’86a_1419529713-Screen-Shot-2014-12-25-at-113521-AM_1419529756.png‘]

Sunday, January 4, 2015

Russia Accuses U.S. of Supporting the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria. “Seeding Disastrous Consequences”

Russia has accused the United States of having patronised the Islamic State radicals to grow into demonic proportions. Russia‘s chief of General Staff, Valery Gerasimov, on Wednesday lashed out at the U.S for being responsible in providing financial and technical assistance to the ISIS in Syria and elsewhere in the past.

The Russian general was speaking at a meeting of foreign military attaches in Moscow. Gerasimov correlated the rise of the ISIS with “Western interference in the region”. He said the USA and some “leading Western countries” had been seeding “disastrous consequences” in a number of countries, including Libya and Syria. Their game of overthrowing the legitimate authorities in those states has endangered deeper instability in the region, reported RFEL news.
The Russian military head said it was the agenda of Washington and European for a regime change in Syria that created the current turmoil. He said the U.S and allies were “pumping foreign aid to armed opposition groups, and applying international political and media pressure on the Syrian leadership.”

Free Syria Is Terror Group
Echoing the statement of Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Gerasimov said there can be no distinction between the Islamic State group and Syrian armed opposition groups including the Free Syrian Army. He said Moscow’s position is that all armed opposition groups in Syria are illegal terror groups. Russia has been a strong ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and had been opposing efforts of the United States and allies to arm anti-Assad groups like Free Syrian Army.
Gerasimov noted that there were “up to 70,000 militants of various nationalities” fighting with Islamic State. The rapid growth of ISIS would not have been possible without the financial and technical assistance provided by the U.S. to fight and topple the Syrian government. The Russian general described the air strikes by Washington and allies in Syria and Iraq as inadequate and ineffective. He also expressed doubts about a hidden agenda behind the recent White House statements, harping on the need for a ground war to crush the ISIS group.Baby Of West
Meanwhile, “End Times” broadcaster Rick Wiles also aired suspicion that there is a U.S hand behind the rise of ISIS. He said it is hard to believe that the U.S.-led coalition had carried out 1,000 airstrikes against ISIS. In his blog at the Right Wing Watch, he said, “I seriously doubt the theory that ISIS is being attacked because it is the creation of Western intelligence agencies and I will not be surprised to find the Israeli Mossad also having its hands in the creation of ISIS.”

„The group was taken over by Abu Omar al-Badhdadi (Hamid Dawud
Mohamed Khalil al Zawi, also known as Abu Abdullah al-Rashid
al-Baghdadi and Abu Hamza al-Baghdadi). Baghdadi, exactly like
Zarqawi before him, enjoyed an interesting career of imprisonments,
deaths and resurrections, as well as questions as to his very
existence. He was reported as captured on March 9, 2007, but that
claim was retracted on March 10. In May 2007 the Iraqi Interior
Ministry reported he had been killed, but the very next month the US
military proclaimed he had never existed, citing information from a
detainee who said that recordings of Baghdadi were actually
recordings of an Iraqi actor hired to put a local face to what was in
fact a foreign-run terror campaign, a claim subsequently echoed by
Hamas-Iraq. However Baghdadi was reported as arrested on April 23,
2009, a claim that was denied by ISI the next month. The group
continued to release recordings of Baghdadi throughout 2009 and 2010
that were authenticated by the (highly suspect) SITE Institute. He
was reported as killed once again in April 2010 after a rocket attack
on the home he was hiding.

The group was then taken over by Ibrahim ibn Awwad ibn Ibrahim ibn
Ali ibn Muhammad al-Badri al-Samarrai, better known by his nom de
guerre, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. This Baghdadi, too, has an uncertain
background constructed from conflicting reports.“