\documentclass[nocolor,memo]{j3}
\renewcommand{\hdate}{13 November 2006}
\renewcommand{\vers}{J3/06-309r1}
\usepackage{lineno}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{xr}
\externaldocument{007}
\input txtest
\input pdftest
\begin{document}
\vspace{-10pt}
\begin{tabbing}
Subject: \hspace*{0.25in}\=Comments on Clause 6\\
From: \>Van Snyder\\
\end{tabbing}
\edits{06-007r1}
\stdref{116:6-8}[Belongs in 2.4.4, except for the last sentence [116:8],
which is already there. Editor: Move [116:6-8] to [19:10], replacing the
first sentence that is already there. Then move the body of Note 6.2 to
the end of Note 2.7 at [19:10+2] as a new paragraph. Then delete
[116:8].]
\stdref{120:19-21}[Editor: Replace the confusing and partly incorrect
second and third phrases of C623:]
\mgpar{}\dcons[C623]{(\snref{array-section}) Exactly one \si{part-ref}
shall have nonzero rank, and either the final \si{part-ref} shall have a
\si{section-subscript-list} with nonzero rank, another \si{part-ref} shall
have nonzero rank, or the \si{complex-part-designator} shall be an array.}
\stdref{121:12-13}[What is the point of a one-line subclause? Editor:
Delete ``{\bfseries\sffamily \ref{D6:Array elements} Array elements}'' and
move [121:13] to [121:11+].]
\stdref{125:10, 14-15}[Either we need ``in the statement'' in C627 and
C630, or we don't need it in C628. It can't be because of ``any'' since
that appears in C630. I prefer not to have it in C628. Editor: Delete
it. Then combine C630 into C628 by appending ``is unlimited polymorphic,
or is of abstract type,'' before ``either'' and delete C630.]
\stdref{126:26+1-2}[Editor: Delete the vacuous note.]
\stdref{128:7-8}[This paragraph is entirely devoid of new information.
Editor: Delete it.]
\stdref{128:13}[Given [128:9] there should be no question that the
allocation status of an allocatable variable can change. Editor: Delete
``; the status \dots\ procedure''.]
\stdref{128:15}[Given [128:9] there should be no question that the
allocation status of an allocatable variable can change. Editor: Delete
``; the status \dots\ program''.]
\stdref{128:16-17}[Given [128:9] there should be no question that the
allocation status of an allocatable variable can change. Editor: Delete
``; the status \dots\ construct''.]
\stdref{128:24-26+7}[Editor: Move the paragraph and Note 6.25 to [126:26+]
to say everything about the relation between allocation and co-arrays in
the same place.]
\label{lastpage}
\end{document}