The finding of this
report is that Baker "does (emphasis theirs)
conform to the statutory definition of the sexual psychopath".
He was "assigned the diagnosis of: Paraphilia, pedophilia."

In 1993, after learning of these charges, the Fraternity
Snoqualmie Board voted to retain Baker as a member.
The board members who voted to keep him were Chris
Lawrence, Larry Mohrman, Chuck Hutchins, Del Moore,
Steve Smith, Art Panneck and Pat Lowe. To this day
Baker is still a member of the camp and over the
years club members, and even members of the Board
have lied to protect Baker and kep him on at the club. Club management
has place Baker in charge of "security" at
numerous of their public events and he in currently
in charge of the Fraternity Snoqualmie computer system.
Baker even has a pending application, and is next
in line, to become a permanent resident at the camp.
Baker, and his current wife, who is on the FS Board are swingers
who attend "New
Horizons" a
swinger club in Lynwood Washingon.

The Honorable Stephen
M. Reilley
Superior Court for King County
King County Courthouse
Seattle, Washington 98104

May 25, 1982

Re:
Baker, Roger Reed
Re: Cause No. 80-1-02391

Dear Judge Reilley:

Mr. Roger Baker was admitted to the Sex
Offender Program at Western State
Hospital for a 90 day period of observation and evaluation on March
26, 1982, to determine the existence of sexual psychopathy. On September
17, 1980, Mr. Baker pled guilty to the charge of statutory rape in
the third degree.

The
current offense occurred in the
early spring of 1979 which involved Mr. Baker with his
stepdaughter, age 13, about 4:30 p.m. Mr. Baker's
stepdaughter came home from school complaining of a
pain in her back due to playing softball. She indicated
that her muscles were sore
and asked Mr. Baker to put some lotion on her back. She then removed
her tee shirt and Mr. Baker told her to take her brassiere off because
it was in the way. His stepdaughter told him that
this was not necessary, but Mr. Baker insisted so she removed her
brassiere. Mr. Baker then rubbed the lotion on her back and stomach
as she was laying on her bed, in the bedroom, on her stomach. Mr.
Baker's stepdaughter indicates that he then had
her roll on to her back, and he began to rub her breasts. She states
that she is unable to remember whether he used lotion on her breasts
or not, but she thinks he rubbed her breasts for
about five minutes. Mr. Baker then removed her shorts and panties.
At that time the stepdaughter asked why he took
them off and he replied, "Don't
you want me to rub you?" She indicated by saying, "No,
I don't want you to", but he removed her shorts anyway. Mr.
Baker's stepdaughter then states that he bent over and put his tongue
into her vagina. At that time she again said, "Don't do that",
but he did not stop. She then states that he removed all of his clothing
so that he was completely naked. Mr. Baker then laid down beside
her on his back, took her hands and placed them on his erect penis
and stated, "rub me. " He then took a hold of her
head and pulled it down onto his penis forcing his penis
into her mouth. She states that he kept her
head on his penis until he ejaculated into her mouth.
Mr. Baker then asked her not to tell her
mother. Mr. Baker's stepdaughter indicates that this type
of behavior began when she was 9 years old
and continued up to the age of 13. When Mr. Baker and
his wife separated and became divorced, the
stepdaughter indicates that she spent almost every weekend
with Mr. Baker. She states that there was only one bed in his
apartment and no sofa, so they slept together in the same bed.
She states that she slept in her nightgown and he always slept
in only a tee shirt. She states that it was not uncommon for
Mr. Baker to walk in front of her with only his tee shirt on.
She also states that he always made her dress and undress in
front of him so that he could see her naked. Mr. Baker's stepdaughter
states that she was 15 years old during the separation and
divorce. She states that she finally became so upset around
the weekends that she told her friend about this activity.
This friend told his parents who convinced Mr. Baker's stepdaughter
to turn this matter over to the Auburn Police Department. In
July of 1980, Mr. Baker was arrested for third degree statutory
rape. In December of 1980, Mr. Baker PLED GUILTY TO THE CHARGE
OF THIRD DEGREE STATUTORY RAPE. Mr. Baker then began treatment
with Northwest Treatment Associates and was informed by them
that he could not stay over night at his house with his second
wife, due to the fact that she had a minor female, age 10,
and a minor male, age 9. Mr. Baker chose to spend a night there
at which time his probation was revoked, and in September of
1981 he spent 30 days in the King County Jail. Mr. Baker, then
contacted his stepdaughter on two different occasions and states
that his wife had an emergency and he had to stay overnight
again in the house. Mr. Baker's probation
was again revoked and he spent five months in the King County
Jail starting in October of 1981 until his admission to Western
State Hospital's Sex Offender Program on March 26, 1982.

Upon admission to Western State Hospital,
Mr. Baker began our standard
evaluation process which includes both assessment and treatment. He
was evaluated by professional staff members concerning the psychiatric,
psychological, social and medical elements relative to his sexual
offending. He remained on a locked ward where he was observed as he
participated in treatment with a functioning treatment group of committed
sexual psychopaths. Their schedule includes approximately 30 hours
of group psychotherapy treatments each week. During the patient's
observation period, his treatment group also gives their opinion to
the staff relative the question of sexual psychopathy. In addition
to the data gathered from these standard procedures, we have obtained
the routine prosecutorial matters including a report form Northwest
Treatment Associates, Seattle, Washington; a report from Alice Gross,
M.S.W., Child Protective Service, Kent Washington; a report from Norman
R. Matski, Ph.D Seattle, Washington; a report from Marsha Medows,
P.O. Auburn, Washington; and a report from the victim and the Auburn
Police Department. Our conclusions and recommendations result from
the combining of the data from these various sources.

The primary evaluation question addressed
was, does Mr. Baker conform
to the statutory definition of a sexual psychopath.

Mr.
Baker revealed a pattern
of sexual deviancy beginning at the age of 12. At the age of 12, he
began having fantasies of fondling and seeing
a female cousin, age 12, nude and he was masturbating
to those fantasies. At the
age of 13, he fondled his female cousin and discussed with her having
sexual intercourse with her.
However, he states that he refused her. At the age of 14, he began
to read pornographic material (Playboy) and would masturbate to fantasies
around the pictures. At the age of 16, he had
his first sexual experience and this type of sexual activity lasted
for 18 months with a same age female. At the age of 17 through 20,
he indicates that there were no more sexual relationships with same
age females. Also, he indicates that he was attending pornographic
movies on occasions. At the age of 21, he joined the United States
Army and became involved with prostitutes.
He also had sexual intercourse with a minor female, age 15. At the
age of 23, in July of 1969, he married his first wife. He indicates
having a good sexual relationship until they began
having marital problems, at the age of 25 through
27, which led him into dating ex-girl friends and having sexual relationships
with them. At the age of 28 through 29, he
became involved with his stepdaughter, age 9. This involved him removing
his clothing and having her do the same, at which time he would perform
oral sodomy, fondle and put his penis into her mouth until he ejaculated.
This type of sexual activity continued on 24
different occasions until she was age 12. At the age of 30, he continued
fighting with his wife and started going to massage parlors, pornographic
movies and became involved
with pornographic magazines. He states that he continued
having fantasies of his stepdaughter, age 12
at this time. At the age of 31, he had sexual intercourse with a female,
approximately age 17. At the age of 31 through 32, he
indicates having normal sexual activities with
adult females same age. At the age of 33, his stepdaughter, age 13,
turned him in the Child Protective Services in Auburn, Washington
at which time it was turned over to the Auburn Police Department.
At the age of 35, he was charged with third
degree statutory rape. Also, he was separated from his wife at which
time his stepdaughter, age 15, was living with him on the weekends.
In his apartment he had only one bed and no
sofa, so he and his stepdaughter would sleep
together. She states that she was wearing her nightgown but he always
slept just in a tee shirt. He reported noticing her being "sexy" and
he had desires for her. He always made her
dress and undress in front of him so that he could
see her naked. At the age of 36, he married
his present wife in September of 1980. His present
wife has two children from her previous
marriage, one minor male, age 9, and one minor female,
age 10. Mr. Baker had been in treatment
with Northwest Treatment Associates and was informed
by them that he could not spend a night
in that house while in treatment. However, on two occasions
he chose to do that, for which he had two probation revocation
hearings For the first revocation he spent one month in the
King County Jail and for the second revocation he spent five
months in the King County Jail, which started in October of
1981 and lasted until he was admitted in the sex offenders program
at Western State Hospital on March 26, 1982.

Mr.
Bakers personality profile suggests that
he is defensive and inclined not to admit personal problems
but to present a socially adequate and morally
righteous image. His is highly favorable
in presentation of himself which suggests limited insight and
minimization of responsibility for his conduct.
Mr. Baker shows an above average tested ability,
which suggests sufficient ability to handle
the conceptual demands of the treatment program.

The
definition of a sexual
psychopath, according to R.C.W. 71.06 states that this person "is affected in a form of psychoneurosis
or in a form of psychopathic personality, which form predisposes
such a person to the commission of a sexual offense in a degree constituting
a menace to the health and safety of others". The Sex
Offender Program feels our responsibility for identifying
the sexual psychopath is to discover those
elements in a person 's behavioral history and personality
makeup which, in fact, predispose that person
to sexual crimes. The prediction of future behavior
is imprecise but, in our opinion, the best
single indicator of future dangerous sexual behavior is
a clear history of past dangerous sexual behavior.

On May 12, 1982, the Sex Offender Program
Treatment Staff reviewed
Mr. Baker's case and determined the following specific conclusions
and recommendations.

1. Mr. Baker DOES conform to the statutory
definition of the SEXUAL PSYCHOPATH.

2. He has been assigned the diagnosis of:
PARAPHILIA, PEDOPHILIA.

Given the recent State versus Bunich decision,
it is our understanding
that in keeping with the law, if the court finds Mr. Baker a sexual
psychopath, he must be recommitted. If he is returned to us, we will
continue to process of evaluating him relative to amenability to treatment
and forward a second report to the court no later that 90 additional
days past recommitment.

We hope our conclusions and recommendations
have been helpful
to the court in this matter. Mr. Baker's evaluation is now complete
and he is available for transport at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely yours,

Gary Shepherd, B.S.
Therapy Supervisor

Maureen Saylor, M.A. DirectorSex Offender Program

M.M Vitols, M.D.
Acting Clinical Director

Since 3.28.04 (This material is
provided without profit for research and educational
purposes.)