This program decodes the raw Flight Data Recorder (FDR commonly called "black box") file for American Airlines Flight 77 (AAL77) included by the
US National Transport Safety Board (NTSB) on CDROMs provided in response to FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests for information regarding the
events of September 11th 2001.

The program allows you to selectively decode parts of the FDR file and generate a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file containing the selected
information. The first line of the CSV file contains the parameter names and it can be opened by various programs including Microsoft Excel and
Microsoft Access.

"Some people have queried my credentials for investigating Flight Data Recorder (FDR commonly called "black box") data and any relevant
affiliations I may have.

I do not have any specific credentials to investigate FDRs or aircraft accidents....

I am not affiliated with nor have I ever worked with or for neither the US National Transport Safety Board (NTSB) nor any other aircraft accident
investigator.

I am neither a pilot nor an aircraft engineer and have never flown an aircraft. I am not affiliated with nor have I ever worked with or for any
airline, any pilots’ organisation, any aircraft engineering organisation or any FDR manufacturer.

My investigation in to the events of September 11th 2001 is unofficial, independent and completely voluntary.

I was born in New Zealand and I have joint New Zealand and Irish citizenship. I lived in New Zealand up until June 2008 and since then have lived in
Brisbane, Australia." - Warren Stutt

(AGAIN.....the data was corrupted due to impact factors, and the NTSB was tasked with putting out a preliminary video as a way to comprehend the
event.)

But, regardless......there are still plenty of eyewitnesses, and the debris and the most conclusive.....the DNA.

The fact is, the flight operating as American 77 impacted the Pentagon.

These claims otherwise (and in fact, this thread and the Original Poster does not claim there was no American 77 impact....this OP's assertion is
about the "angle" of the impact....an attempt to 'shoe-horn' in a so-called "North of Citgo" ground track path).

Proudbird, why hasn't the NTSB claimed that such information is missing from their decode, and more importantly, why have they not acknowledged such a
"corrupt bug" in their industry leading software in which Warren Stutt claims exists?

Secondly, why hasn't one pilot been willing to endorse the Legge/Stutt analysis? Why haven't you endorsed their work?

Translation - "I have no intention of crawling out of my hole to endorse anything that I claim or promote. I have only nervous laughter. Since I am
such a loser, I had no choice but to beg the ATS mods to let me back on the boards so I can feel superior in some way.", Proudbird/Weedwhacker

Originally posted by ProudBird
In this thread it has been clearly refuted, by a preponderance of evidence,

OK, so this explains your attitude. You feel only a "preponderance of evidence" is required to justify something like
this.

Unfortunately for you, (and for those linked above), and perhaps fortunately for the rest of us, the death penalty (or any type of criminal charges)
requires evidence Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. Clearly you do not know the difference.

However, thanks to people like you, who spend their days and nights arguing with people you think are nuts for requiring a higher standard of
evidence, you will be elated to know that such a high standard is being eroded daily from the US Constitution.. again, thanks to people like you.

Originally posted by ProudBird
In this thread it has been clearly refuted, by a preponderance of evidence,

OK, so this explains your attitude. You feel only a "preponderance of evidence" is required to justify something like
this.

Unfortunately for you, (and for those linked above), and perhaps fortunately for the rest of us, the death penalty (or any type of criminal charges)
requires evidence Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. Clearly you do not know the difference.

However, thanks to people like you, who spend their days and nights arguing with people you think are nuts for requiring a higher standard of
evidence, you will be elated to know that such a high standard is being eroded daily from the US Constitution.. again, thanks to people like you.

Your failure to answer my questions once again noted.

You will eventually be held accountable. Truth always prevails.

edit on 16-3-2012 by CFerguson because: (no reason given)

I certainly agree with your last three words. So how did the "cockpit door never opened " and the "Acars messages" smoking guns pan out ?

And you are telling me that a 55’ foot long airfoil weighing at LEAST a total of six and a half tons traveling at something around 750 feet per
second is going to be ripped apart by a 20-some-odd foot 8 inch diameter aluminum light pole designed to break away when a car hits it.

Your logic is flawed. Yes it's possible as I said, weight is not the issue. Here's an example why:

Consider hitting a golf ball with a golf club, the golf ball weighs about 45 grams. What happens to the golf ball?

Now, set down an ostrich egg on your golf tee (which weighs 120 KG and is much larger) and hit it with the same club.

This is going way off topic. I know I started it but I couldn't just let your truth will prevail comment pass.

You know perfectly well that the cockpit door was never recorded open, not only on the final fatal flight but on several previous including
trans-continental. There is no evidence the cockpit door parameter was ever connected and, given that it was never recorded open, it seems vanishingly
improbable it ever was.

So far as the Acars messages fiasco is concerned , you yourself pulled the debate about it on P4t wnen it went pear-shaped.

Oh. My. Lord. Someone is off his meds again. You really should try and keep up with your lithium prescriptions, but we all do appreciate and enjoy
your visits here.

PfT has been kind of quiet of late - you need to come up with a new "smoKinG gUn!!11!!" - something like the ammonia vapors from backed up toilets
paralyzed all the passengers and turned those innocent Saudi passangers into zombie terrorists. Could you look into that for us, since it is your site
and all. Its kind of tough getting our joint ATS/Pentagon Blogger Bonus payments when PfT gets into its paranoid schizophrenic manic depressive phase
(which is all the time, really).....its just that there are no bonus payments for us Section 5 workers when PfT isn't issuing Press Releases!!!
touting some moonbat aeronautical clown car.

How many transcontinental flights did that airplane have in the weeks prior to 9/11 where you claim the cockpit door *never ever* opened? How long
does it take to fly from Newark or Dulles or Kennedy or Logan to SFO or LAX? How long did your ACARS sMoKinG gUn!!!11! last before you took it down
because you admited you had no clue whatsoever as to what was really going on? At what speed will an aircraft "break"? What altitude will a
departing KADW aircraft be when it crosses KDCA on a Camp Springs 1 departure? What altuitude will KDCA approach aircraft be in the airfield
environment when in the terminal phase of their arrival procedures? What does the "P" in P-56 mean and why would a controller vector an aircraft
(Gopher 06) toward and along the very edge of a "P" area?

Anyhow, I hope you jump on this generator trailer thread and explain to all of us (before you are banned again, of course), in your inimicable way,
how a 757 can create that sort of damage from a north of the Citgo service station flight path. Or how it can fly over. Or fly by. Or disappear.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.