Author
Topic: First Stuck Fermentation (Read 1964 times)

So a friend and I made an American barley wine with an OG of .095. We pitched 2 packs of Wyeast 1332 in a 1 liter starter and 4 days later we poured in a vial of wlp545. During this time we kept the temperature at 60ish for 3 weeks and then raised the temperature to 70F for one week then placed the beer into a secondary. Once we moved to the secondary we took another hydrometer reading and only had a drop to .047. I was hoping for at least .030. We were planing on doing the following. Crash the beer to 50F for two weeks to get everything out of suspension and then raise the temperature back to 60 and place in another starter made from 1 vial of wlp545 along with yeast nutrients. After a week do another diacetyl rest and then bottle. Good idea?

« Last Edit: June 02, 2013, 05:09:16 AM by rhcpfan4002 »

Logged

“Ho! Ho! Ho! To the bottle I goTo heal my heart and drown my woeRain may fall, and wind may blowAnd many miles be still to goBut under a tall tree will I lieAnd let the clouds go sailing by” ― J.R.R. Tolkien

Your best chance of resuming fermentation is probably to make a fresh starter with a vial or pack of yeast and pitch the starter while it is highly active. It is probably going to be tough, though.

It looks like you accidentally gave us a textbook example of the potential effect of underpitching yeast. Unfortunately, that becomes more significant when making such a high gravity beer. Not to say that's what happened, since I have no way of knowing the fermentability of the wort, but it is a distinct possibility.

Ideal pitch for an ale:0.85e9 cells/LxP x 19 L x 23 P = 371e9 cells

I've found that a vial of yeast pitched into a half-liter will grow about 1.25-fold, so you probably pitched ~225e9-250e9 cells, or about 1/2 - 2/3 of the recommended cell density.

For a high gravity beer like this, brewers often use a higher pitch rate, maybe half-again higher, which could put you down near 1/3 the recommended amount of yeast.

Edit: I didn't notice the third vial of yeast, but seeing the mash temperature you may have found the real culprit.

Yeast two smack packs of wyeast 1332 and one vial of wlp545 4 days later

Mash Schedule:sacc 158F for 120 minmash out 167Fsparge 167F

Logged

“Ho! Ho! Ho! To the bottle I goTo heal my heart and drown my woeRain may fall, and wind may blowAnd many miles be still to goBut under a tall tree will I lieAnd let the clouds go sailing by” ― J.R.R. Tolkien

I'd say 158F mash temp is a tad bit on the high side for an American BW. Any Barleywine for that matter...

Yeah, I probably wouldn't waste more yeast on trying to get the gravity lower, since it might just be done. You can try giving it a little more time and see if it is dropping at all, but more yeast isn't going to do much.

I'd say 158F mash temp is a tad bit on the high side for an American BW. Any Barleywine for that matter...

Yeah, I probably wouldn't waste more yeast on trying to get the gravity lower, since it might just be done. You can try giving it a little more time and see if it is dropping at all, but more yeast isn't going to do much.

Edit: Sonething more like 149F might have been a beter choice.

I agree with this. For really big beers I usually shoot for lower mash temps to promote more fermentation.

Logged

Jeff Gladish, Tampa (989.3, 175.1 Apparent Rennarian)Homebrewing since 1990AHA member since 1991, now a lifetime member BJCP judge since 1995

I'd say 158F mash temp is a tad bit on the high side for an American BW. Any Barleywine for that matter...

Yeah, I probably wouldn't waste more yeast on trying to get the gravity lower, since it might just be done. You can try giving it a little more time and see if it is dropping at all, but more yeast isn't going to do much.

Edit: Sonething more like 149F might have been a beter choice.

I agree with this. For really big beers I usually shoot for lower mash temps to promote more fermentation.

Thanks everyone,I'll discuss with my friend what we should do. I seriously never had this happen before. I always hit the attenuation of what the yeast is suppose to hit. Then again, except for my tripel, all my beers are under .06. I am taking it that if you make beers with a greater o.g. you need to think differently than with a beer with a smaller o.g.

Logged

“Ho! Ho! Ho! To the bottle I goTo heal my heart and drown my woeRain may fall, and wind may blowAnd many miles be still to goBut under a tall tree will I lieAnd let the clouds go sailing by” ― J.R.R. Tolkien

158°F is a high mash temperature, even for a 1.060 beer, unless you want it to finish thick. I sometimes use mash temperatures that high for beers down in the 1.035-1.040 range. I'll occasionally use 155-156°F for a 1.048 beer. They are noticeably full bodied and lower the attenuation by about 10% from a beer mashed down near 149°F.

Remember, Big beers will finish higher than small beers by nature. This difference is magnified by mash temperature. If I am doing a low gravity mild (1.038-1.042), I mash at 162, and get about 50% AA. With my Scotch ale (1.080ish), I mashed at 152, and got about 70% AA. When I mash my APA (1.055) at 152, I get about 75-80% AA.

Some of this is yeast strain dependent, some is recipe dependent (my APA has 0 crystal), but a huge part of the difference is mash temperature.

regardless, this is a good learning experience. I would taste the beer. It might taste ok. If it is too sweet, I would not recommend throwing in more yeast (Sacc), because I think you are pretty close to the final gravity you are going to get. You might be able to get a brett strain to bring that down a bit further before the alcohol takes them out.

You might get a few more points by raising the temperature and pitching an active yeast starter. If it goes nowhere, at least you can be confident bottling it. If it's sweet tasting, bottle and stick it in a corner for a few years.

Logged

Delmarva United Homebrewers - President by inverse coup - former president ousted himself.AHA Member since 2006BJCP Certified: B0958

I had a BW that was sickly sweet (extract batch of NB's Lord Fatbottom, so not a mash issue) - I bottled and stored it still and it improved over time (2 years). I blend it with a simple ale (just a little) once in a while for serving and it comes out fine.

I had a BW that was sickly sweet (extract batch of NB's Lord Fatbottom, so not a mash issue) - I bottled and stored it still and it improved over time (2 years). I blend it with a simple ale (just a little) once in a while for serving and it comes out fine.

+ Eleventy billion! There is nothing wrong with blending. In fact, you often end up with an excellent beer that could not have been brewed singly.

Logged

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool. -Richard P. Feynman