Yes indeed, never give up! The body isn’t real, the gravesite was prepared by the FBI and the Russian mafia, Hans didn’t really confess, it’s all part of a gigantic conspiracy that every single man, woman and child in the world is privy to except YOU.

Well of course it is!!!!!!! Its all 1 Gigantic Conspiracy and Cover-Up By Our Government right here in The U.S.A.!!!!!!! NONE Of this ever happened!!!!!! It was all a big hoax put on by the illuminatti!!!!!! Nina Rieser Is alive and well!!!!! VERY WELL In Fact!!! She’s down on abevautiful tropical beach sipping fruity drinks from coconuts right alongside Elvis,Biggie-Smalls, and Tupac!!!!!!!!! Please get a grip on your own Mental-State!!!!! Hans Rieser is a sick murderer plain and simple, and he’s exactly where he should be!!!!! Just Rotting Away!!!!!!

After all that happened, the trial, vilification of Nina Reiser, the Police, prosecutors, etc. and deification of Hans, the best you can offer is “Whoops, we were way off-base on this one!” Didn’t really care about the whole thing all that much, did you?

As the poster above said, a public apology to everyone involved would be the classy response. At least your idiocy was and is public so people can watch out for you in future.

Hans Reiser did nothing wrong. His wife committed adultery against him. The penalty for a female having relations with a man not her husband is death. He did the morally correct thing in killing the woman who betrayed him, then stole his children, and then used to state to steal his wealth aswell.

Hans Reiser is a hero to Men: he is technically brilliant (creating the first journaling file system for linux), he is genererous (giving away his life’s work for free to the Men of the world), and upholds the sanctity of marraige (not allowing a whore to destroy his life without hers going down in flames aswell: showing that there IS a penalty against women who do so (and so many women do)).

Hans Reiser must be freed, or the culture who imprisons him must cease to exist.

“The penalty for a female having relations with a man not her husband is death.”

Not in the US, it isn’t.

“He did the morally correct thing in killing the woman who betrayed him,”

No he didn’t.

“…then stole his children”

No she didn’t.

“…and then used to state to steal his wealth aswell.”

No she didn’t. He didn’t *have* any wealth. He was a broke loser.

“Hans Reiser is a hero to Men: ”

No he isn’t.

“…he is technically brilliant (creating the first journaling file system for linux), \”

No he isn’t. Find *one* line of code that he contributed to ReiserFS. You won’t be able to find one. The only thing he contributed to that project was his name.

“…he is genererous…”

No he isn’t. He’s not even generous to his own children. He owed almost $100,000 in back child support. Not spousal support, child support. As in, money that he was legally obligated to pay to feed his children.

“and upholds the sanctity of marraige”

Any man who denies his children a mother and a father knows nothing about the “sanctity of marriage”.

Anyway, Mikee, sorry you’re so angry about women. Maybe your mom wouldn’t have left you if your father hadn’t beaten her so much.

Technically, I should have called myself “MikeeUSA is insane”, because he’s actually more insane than retarded.

If you want a good laugh, Google the guy and check out his “art” and “music”. The music sounds very similar to what happens when my cat walks across the piano keys.

MikeeUSA is an interesting specimen, a person with aspirations of grandeur, but extremely limited abilities. As such, he harbors a tremendous amount of self-hatred for failing to live up to his unrealistic self-image. Instead of directing his hatred directly at himself, he turns on his “creator”, in this case his mother.

Cases like the Reiser trial bring sick people like MikeeUSA out of the woodwork, because it speaks to their fantasies of being able to kill women who have scorned them or who make them feel inadequate. If his mental illness/anger go untreated, he will wind up either dead or incarcerated.

Interestingly, the Open Source movement gives people like MikeeUSA a sandbox to play in, a place to pretend they’re software developers. Unable to function in real life, get a degree or keep a job, people like Mikee pretend that they’re serious contributors to software projects, usually by posting to forums rather than actually writing code.

The posts that he’s made, threats and urging people to commit violent acts, are already adequate to indict him. Let’s hope he gets the help he needs before he does permanent damage to himself or others.

I have a bachelors degree. I have a low paying part-time job. All of the income is disposable (every last cent… I probably keep more money then you do at the end of the month).

I know that all my “contributions” are mediocre: I make them because I enjoy doing so, not for your enjoyment but for my own.

I don’t dislike my Mom.

“The posts that he’s made, threats and urging people to commit violent acts, are already adequate to indict him. Let’s hope he gets the help he needs before he does permanent damage to himself or others.”

May God allow me to protect my freedom to speak (which is an inherent right of all Men) and print what I wish in the face of anything upto and-including death.

It doesn’t matter what your local laws say is “proper”. All Men who are not traitors to their fellow Man know that Reiser did nothing wrong.

Childsupport is a cot in his house and a bowl on his table. It was right to not pay the worthless whore.

The death penalty for a female who committs adultery is supported by the moral teaching of all major religions and most minority religions. Unfortunatly, our modern culture ignores the ages old wisdom and promotes perversion instead of families. Instead of penalizing the man who protects his family our nations ought to make an example out of his manly and moral action.

Bob wrote: “The death penalty for a female who committs adultery is supported by the moral teaching of all major religions…”

Anyone can cherry-pick passages from the Bible and say that “this is forbidden” or “this is allowed”.

Here’s just one example to show how simple-minded your point of view is. Genesis Chapter 38, God kills Onan for masturbating.

“Unfortunately, our modern culture ignores the ages old wisdom…”

By your reasoning, we should have the death penalty for masturbation, too. There are plenty of other things in the Bible that call for the death penalty. Lunatics like you just cherry pick their favorite causes and say, “See? There oughta be a law!”

Yes, when you live in your parents’ basement, all of your income is disposable.

“I know that all my “contributions” are mediocre…”

That’s the first sensible thing you’ve ever said.

“May God allow me to protect my freedom to speak…”

Even an elementary school student knows that there is a difference between Constitutionally protected speech and criminal speech. You can’t threaten to kill people, you can’t commit acts of slander or libel, you can’t encourage people to commit acts of violence, you can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater.

You’re going to learn this the hard way. Maybe you’ll be lucky, and you’ll get a cell next to Hans and you can throw a party for each other.

“Childsupport is a cot in his house and a bowl on his table.”

You’re a retard. Regardless of how you feel about the parents, the children are innocent and by law Hans was obligated to take care of them. Instead, he decided to deprive them of both of their parents. And yet, he’s a hero to you.

“All Men who are not traitors to their fellow Man know that Reiser did nothing wrong.”

You’re an idiot. The only “men” who “know” this are either mentally ill or stupid.

We’ll all be a lot safer when some DA decides to put you in prison where you belong.

It is typical of liberals to attack the person when they have no rational argument. Speaking truth to left wingnut agendas usually results in personal attacks because reason and clear thinking gets in the way of their irrational emotion based dogma.

“Bob”, don’t you think it’s ironic to complain about ad hominen attacks, and then launch into one yourself?

Since you’re clearly not very bright, let me explain it to you bit by bit.

You say: “It is typical of liberals to attack the person when have no rational argument.”

That’s a complaint about people making personal attacks.

Then you go on to say: “Speaking truth to left wingnut agendas usually results in personal attacks because reason and clear thinking gets in the way of their irrational emotion based dogma”.

That’s a personal attack.

Do you see the irony? Or do I need to define “irony” for you, too?

By the way, “Bob”, anyone who’s reading this knows that you’re really “MikeeUSA”, so there’s no reason pretending.

Now, would you care to point out which part of my discussion is “irrational” and “emotional”? Is it the part where I rationally point out that, according to the Bible, masturbation is a sin punishable by death?

Or, is it the part where I rationally point out that Hans deprived his two children of their parents?

Or, maybe it’s the part where I rationally point out the difference between Constitutionally protected free speech and criminal speech?

Maybe you consider the part where I say that you live in your parents basement, or create awful music, or have awful spelling to be personal attacks. They’re not, as they’re all truthful, and are also supported by your own comments.

You say that all of your income is disposable. This indicates that you’re not paying rent. Must be living with your parents!

You admit that your music is awful. So my referring to that certainly can’t be an attack, we both agree on that point.

As far as your atrocious spelling, that speaks for itself.

And I haven’t even mentioned your drawings, that look like they were done by a fourth grader.

You clearly think that your beliefs that women should be killed, and that people who disagree with you should be killed, gives you some sort of moral superiority.

Your statements about Jon Bruning alone, which can be seen by anyone who uses Google, is enough to land you in federal prison. Have you spoken with the FBI yet? It’s easy enough for them to find you, considering you’re so sloppy about your identity.

When you finally wind up in prison, it won’t be for lack of warning. I’ve seen people all over the internet advising you that you’re going to get yourself into trouble. It’s clear that you’re either too stupid or too crazy to control yourself, so that’s certainly where you’re going to wind up.

The good news for you is that you’ll finally be able to socialize with a bunch of people who have committed violent acts against women.

Care to point out any statements of mine that don’t agree with reality? I’ve already pointed out a number of yours.

Let me list some of your delusions, just to recap:

1) You believe it’s “the law” that women are to be killed for adultery.
2) You believe that making terroristic threats and inciting violence are Constitutionally protected speech.
3) You think that “a cot and a bowl” are child support.
4) You think that Reiser, a convicted murderer, did “nothing wrong”.
5) You think that “most men” agree with you. That’s the best of the bunch, I think.
6) You think that Hans Reiser is a technically gifted engineer. It took him over 12 years to finish his undergrad degree. That’s a fact.

Other than delusion, there’s another possibility that explains your beliefs, which is that you’re stupid. Maybe, probably, it’s a combination of both.

Since you like pointing out tactics of “liberals” (I guess a liberal is anyone who disagrees with you) let me point out a tactic that’s typical of people who are incapable of putting together a rational argument: they call the other person a “delusional idiot” and say there’s no point in arguing with them. (Hint: that’s what you just did!)

You’re right that there’s “no point” in arguing with me. There’s no point in arguing because you are incapable of putting together a coherent argument. All you’re capable of doing is shouting about how everyone agrees with you, and how women should be killed, and how anyone who disagrees with you should be killed.

Now, I’ve given you paragraph after paragraph of statements that you can pick apart, since I’m such a “delusional idiot”. I’ve certainly given you plenty of ammo, why don’t you point out to everyone all of the “idiot delusions”?

“Now, would you care to point out which part of my discussion is \u201cirrational\u201d and \u201cemotional\u201d? Is it the part where I rationally point out that, according to the Bible, masturbation is a sin punishable by death?”

God killed that guy because said guy was obligated by the old law to take as a wife his brothers widow and raise children he had with her as his brother would have (as if they were his brothers children): this is to pay honour to his brother and sorta allow him to have a lineage. The still living brother failed to do that, God became unhappy that he wasn’t honouring his brother’s memory and killed him.

PS: I’m not Bob. Believe what you want though🙂
I didn’t know Bob was getting a job with the FBI though?

14 Ye shall keep the sabbath therefore; for it is aholy unto you: every one that defileth it shall surely be put to bdeath: for whosoever doeth any work therein, that soul shall be cut off from among his people.

Sorry, Bob/Mikee, you’re either the same person or confederates. You both post within an hour of each other, on a thread that averages a post a month? Not very likely. Especially not likely when it happens to be two people who have a point of view that’s shared by an extremely small percentage of the population.

I feel sorry for the talented, if arrogant, Hans Reiser. But the proprietor of this site wanted to get him off scot free for killing his wife, even though it was perfectly clear from the start that he did. It was probably a crime of passion, at the time. But his sponsorship of reiserfs blinded his fans.

Hans Reiser was justified in killing his wife (or rather woman, read the OT hebrew): she had sex with a man other than him. The Old Testament calls for her to die. I am glad that she was killed. She divorced him (The OT does not allow females to leave, the man is ba’al: master) and committed adultery against him. She deserved to die and die she did. She’s in the ground, as God commanded such things be. Hans Reiser did the correct thing. It may have given pause to other whores thinking of having relations with men other than their husband. They do not have that right, Hans enforced his rights against the woman who was his own.

In the Old Testament, man is ba’al (master). Not so in feminist cuntries.
In the Old Testament men can marry female children (Deuteronomy 22 28-29, hebrew). Not so in feminist cuntries (it is a crime worse than murder)
In the Old Testament even if a man rapes a young girl, he just keeps her and pays her father.

All you will get out of dating is a cunt woman who will fuck you over.
Like Hans Reiser got.
But he killed her, as the Old Testament said for him to do.
(All these things are in the book of Deuteronomy)