(Go 2:43 in the video at the link to avoid the tediously extended "Daily Show" set-up.)

ADDED: Since no one seems to be bothering to watch the video, I will add this description that gives away the surprise:

“Well, I think that she’s got a lot of Marla. She’s a really beautiful baby — she’s got Marla’s legs.” Then making a gesture that indicated large breasts, he added, “We don’t know whether or not she’s got this part yet, but time will tell.”

That's probably a good topic for a post in itself. I almost never watch videos anymore, unless it is music or a trailer I desperately want to see (which is almost never). I can always get the information 100x faster by reading it and if I can't read it I'm not going to sit while someone else wastes my time, especially after a 30 second ad, etc. I think a lot of other people do this too.

That's why to this day I just have to trust that Cruz has an awful speaking demeanor, because I've never seen it myself. I've almost never heard Obama speak at all in the last 9 or whatever years he's been on the national stage. Trump and Hillary tho, they were grandfathered and grandmothered in from the pre-internet days. Ugh.

“Like Trump, Berlusconi consistently seemed too absurd to be true. And yet he was. He won elections again, and again, and again, thriving off any and all attention,” she says. “People didn’t take him or what he said seriously. Then one day we woke up to find our government overrun by criminals, our economy destroyed, and our cultural mores perverted to the extent that the objectification of women was commonplace. There was no more laughing left to do.”http://qz.com/624065/a-tip-to-americans-from-an-italian-who-saw-berlusconi-get-elected-again-and-again-and-again/http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/28/were-donald-trump-and-silvio-berlusconi-separated-at-birth.htmlThe similarities between Berlusconi and Trump are striking.

"Then one day we woke up to find our government overrun by criminals, our economy destroyed, and our cultural mores perverted to the extent that the objectification of women was commonplace. There was no more laughing left to do."

Then they remembered they were Italy and that that had been the case for the last 70-150 years.

This is the kind of thing that get Trump labeled as a woman hater by the kooky David Brooks. It may be boorish, and objectifying, but it is not woman hating unless the term has become meaningless. If woman-hating is a man only seeing women as tools to get what you want, then man hating is a woman only seeing men as tools to get you what you want, and brother, there are a lot of man-haters out there. At least one of them is running for president.

Every time I see a post like this that tends to denigrate Trump, I think about the time Hillary told the families of the Benghazi dead that it was a video that caused the attacks. Then denied she said that to them, later.

Anything anybody can dig up about Trump being less than a perfect candidate for president, Hillary has done worse.

It is sort of like that South Park show where Butters, as Dr. Chaos, is disappointed that every evil scheme he envisages has already been a plot on The Simpsons. Except in the case of Hillary, the level of disgust should be much higher among the populace who knows she has done every last rotten thing imaginable already, and can only top her performances of the past with truly perfidious behavior that will horrify, but not surprise, her public.

"Anything anybody can dig up about Trump being less than a perfect candidate for president, Hillary has done worse."

The argument that Trump is better than Hillary really shouldn't become operational until Trump is the nominee. He's running right now against another candidate (two if you count Kasich) who is also better than Hillary. That is such a low bar to clear that it hardly seems worth pointing out.

I suppose that a pro-choicer would consider the market value of each clump of cells separately, then either call Planned Parenthood to cannibalize the child, a progressive moralist for training in the dysfunctional revolution, or a female chauvinist to reserve space in a Slut Walk.

2. Trump doesn't have any hopes for the subjective experience or skills of his daughters; only their sex appeal

I'd say this sort of extreme garbage is a symptom of the love-or-hate reaction people have to celebrities. I find the tendency of people to go there more perverted than anything they accuse the subject of their hate-crush of.

The answer differs for a male and female child. For a woman, her breasts are a significant asset in reproduction and attraction. Also, there is the hereditary pride and speculation of her father and mother. Trump's daughter has developed into a beautiful, successful, happy, balanced woman, wife, and mother. This seems to be the outcome for all of his children.