It appears to me that some individuals don't understand the potential difference between how and why in this "debate". One book seems to have a interesting desciption of how and the other has an interesting desciption of why. The real problem, in my opinion, is that there is a misunderstanding by some of the true age of the universe. The earth is made up of parts of an exploded star. Think about it.

Wow T, you care to expand on that? Not quite sure what you're getting at. I think I do, but come on man, tell us more.

__________________Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. CD