Court Declines To Hear Teacher's Appeal In Drug Case

The U.S. Supreme Court declined last week to hear the appeal of a
high school teacher who was fired after a marijuana cigarette was found
in her car and she refused to take a drug test.

Sherry Hearn was a teacher at Windsor Forest High School in the
Savannah-Chatham County, S.C., district in 1996 when a police dog
alerted officials to the remnants of a marijuana cigarette in her car
ashtray. District officials were conducting a broad sweep for drugs at
the school using trained dogs provided by the local police
department.

Ms. Hearn was not charged criminally, but school officials demanded
she take a urinalysis drug test. The teacher refused, and she was fired
by the district for insubordination and "other good and sufficient
cause.

"Ms. Hearn challenged the termination in federal court, arguing that
she was under no obligation to take the drug test because the search of
her car was illegal under the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,
which prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." She lost in both
federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th
Circuit, based in Atlanta.

An appeals court panel ruled 2-1 last year that reasonable suspicion
of Ms. Hearn arose in the context of a legal drug sweep of the school
parking lot by law-enforcement officials.

'Law-Enforcement Event'

The Supreme Court has upheld the use of trained dogs to sniff
travelers' luggage for drugs; the 11th Circuit court, among others, has
upheld the same tactic outside cars.

"This was a law-enforcement event, not bound by any school policy or
employment contract," the appellate majority said.

The dissenting judge said that the drug sweep was under the
direction of school officials, and that Ms. Hearn had a contractual
right to be free from searches of her desk, personal items, and vehicle
conducted without her consent. The judge noted that Ms. Hearn had been
critical of the district's policy of conducting drug sweeps and thus
"she was not in favor with the employer."

In her appeal to the Supreme Court, lawyers for Ms. Hearn said lower
courts were divided about whether the use of drug-sniffing dogs in a
public workplace or with parked cars constitutes a search under the 4th
Amendment.

The justices on May 15 declined without comment to hear the appeal
in Hearn v. Savannah and Chatham County Board of Public
Education (Case No. 99-1477).

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.