Vandaman wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>>>> Do not install "Virtualization" and you won't
>> have xen. There are no
>> different ISOs for "with xen" and "without
>> xen".
>>>>>> This means that the OP did not even bother checking the responses
> to his question.
>>http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/068124.html>> even looking at the recent kernel updates one can see for themselves :-
>> x86_64:
> kernel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-doc-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.noarch.rpm
> kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
> kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-92.1.17.el5.x86_64.rpm
>> Regards,
> Vandaman.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
>CentOS at centos.org>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>>>Not to start a pissing contest, but I can assure you, I've read every
response to my question. I did not reply to each and every one because
there is no need to duplicate answers. As for "seeing things" No, I did
not see anything related to virtualization when I started the install.
My fault that I missed it, but sometimes we tend to take things on the
fly and I'm sure while you've never missed anything ever, at least I'll
'fess up to it..
Sam