You have 5 on Tk and 15 on Ps. If you would have distibuted your points like Dravid you would have 11 extra St points. Which would have you on 38 for St. You would have probably scored more goals and been in the 40s by now.

Everyone had an opportunity to discuss with their captain their potential roles and readjust their points before the season started.

Its not Dravids fault he was wiser in how he used his points for designing his player.

Yeah, but isn't it the whole point of this exercise to help even out the attribute field and help the younger ones catch up to the uber-guns?

The idea of limiting the increases to players who're above 30 in a particular skill, or removing them altogether for those above 35 was perfect, in my opinion. Don't know why that got scrapped.

Founder of ESAS - Edgar Schiferli, the best associate bowler
A follower of the schools of Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett and Benaud
Member of JMAS, DMAS, FRAS and RTDAS

when you're winning, you have friendsscores and dozens, real friendswhen you're winning, never lonelywhen you keep winning

You have 5 on Tk and 15 on Ps. If you would have distibuted your points like Dravid you would have 11 extra St points. Which would have you on 38 for St. You would have probably scored more goals and been in the 40s by now.

Everyone had an opportunity to discuss with their captain their potential roles and readjust their points before the season started.

Its not Dravids fault he was wiser in how he used his points for designing his player.

So if one player made one mistake at the start of their career they have to suffer for the rest of their career, i love that reasoning. You make it sound like it was after two games everyone could tell that only player with 30 odd main were going to dominate the game. You forgot that fact that at the start of his career that 25 odd forwards were scoring goals. You forgot the fact that Dravid started in the teens and was struggling to get shots, let alone goals. If we had players who started in the teens, like Dravid, Hutch and Luff we would have made them change as well. It was only made obivious later on that player with his type of stats were going to struggle and guys like Dravid were going to be dominate. Surely players who are dominating the game should have limitions on how much they can improve. Really guys like him are on par with the keeper and older players, who both can't attend the camp.

The man, the mountain, the Mathews. The greatest all rounder since Keith Miller. (Y)