Anabolic Steroid Forums - Supplementshttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/
Sports supplement discussion.enThu, 24 May 2018 17:30:35 GMTvBulletin60http://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/images/SeamusLight/misc/rss.pngAnabolic Steroid Forums - Supplementshttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/
Growth Factor 9http://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81646-Growth-Factor-9?goto=newpost
Wed, 16 May 2018 20:39:25 GMTJust seeing if anyone has heard of this and their thoughts. An older coworker, 61ish, just told me about it. Said he feels great taking this over the...Just seeing if anyone has heard of this and their thoughts. An older coworker, 61ish, just told me about it. Said he feels great taking this over the counter supplement. supposedly it raises your natural GH by 682%. Reviews mostly seem positive. expensive as fuck though, might as well keep taking generic GH though.
]]>SupplementsTX_hempknighthttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81646-Growth-Factor-9best supp for high liver valueshttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81594-best-supp-for-high-liver-values?goto=newpost
Tue, 15 May 2018 01:35:13 GMThad bloodwork done while in the middle of a dbol run, my ast and alt were high . what would be the best supp to help get liver values down? Im off... had bloodwork done while in the middle of a dbol run, my ast and alt were high . what would be the best supp to help get liver values down? Im off the bol now so what would you recomend? nac? liver support? liv 52? tudca? I know alot of these are used during the run but Im off now what would be the best to help it recover? been cycling for years and never had this happen, also ldl cholestrol is high too Im pounding the fish oil
]]>Supplementsliquidshreddahttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81594-best-supp-for-high-liver-valuesGW1516 (cardarine)http://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81570-GW1516-%28cardarine%29?goto=newpost
Mon, 14 May 2018 03:46:23 GMTAnybody get headaches from this? Its not supposed to cause headaches but I'm getting a really bad one every day later in the evening. I had a great workout today. Did legs and didn't want to stop. Its been only a week since i started it so don't know if thats soon enough to feel like i did or maybe it was just a good day. Anybody with experience that can help i would appreciate it. Thanks.
]]>Supplementsmachinist9http://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81570-GW1516-%28cardarine%29Federal Court Sides With Big Pharma, Rules CBD Has No Medical Valuehttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81522-Federal-Court-Sides-With-Big-Pharma-Rules-CBD-Has-No-Medical-Value?goto=newpost
Fri, 11 May 2018 17:34:10 GMT*Federal Court Sides With Big Pharma, Rules CBD Has No Medical Value*
A federal appeals court has sided with Big Pharma and ruled that CBD has “no...Federal Court Sides With Big Pharma, Rules CBD Has No Medical Value

A federal appeals court has sided with Big Pharma and ruled that CBD has “no medical value” and must therefore remain a Schedule 1 drug, alongside Heroin.

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a decision by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to list cannabidiol (CBD) – a non-psychoactive derivative of cannabis – as a Schedule 1 controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act.

Thefreethoughtproject.com reports: The hemp industry brought a lawsuit against the government in 2016, when the DEA issued a “clarifying rule” that claimed CBD was an illicit drug, due to it being a byproduct of cannabis flowers. A report in the Denver Post explained:

Represented by Denver-based cannabis law firm Hoban Law Group, the Hemp Industries Association and other hemp businesses challenged the DEA’s rule and alleged the agency overstepped its bounds by essentially scheduling substances — notably cannabinoids — that were not classified as illicit in the Controlled Substances Act. Additionally, they argued, the hemp-derived extracts rich in CBD, or cannabinol, are protected under state laws and Farm Bill provisions.

The rule could be misinterpreted by other federal and local agencies, lead to unlawful product seizures and chill a booming multibillion-dollar hemp products industry, Hoban attorneys had said.

The DEA countered by claiming that they had simply provided clarification to existing law, stating that their move “makes no substantive change to the government’s control of any substance.”

Rather than acknowledge the distinct difference between industrial hemp, which contains virtually no psychoactive properties, and THC-laden marijuana that produce strong psychoactive effects, the DEA argued that CBD is made from the flowering parts of the cannabis plant, and cannabinoids “are found in the parts of the cannabis plant that fall within the … definition of marijuana, such as the flowering tops, resin, and leaves.”

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that the DEA had the authority to clarify CBD as a “marijuana extract,” but CBD producers vowed to appeal the decision.

“We will be appealing, and we will be funding that appeal,” said Michael Brubeck, CEO of Centuria Natural Foods and a plaintiff in the case. Centuria was joined in its challenge by the Hemp Industries Association.

In the decision, the three-judge panel said the plaintiffs had failed to take the opportunity to comment during the DEA’s rule-making process, thus nullifying the majority of their challenge to the classification.

Additionally, the court said the rule was not in violation of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (Farm Bill), which contained industrial hemp provisions that defined hemp as cannabis sativa L. plants with less than 0.3 percent concentration of psychoactive THC.

Attorney Bob Hoban, in a statement on Wednesday, said his clients are weighing whether to request a rehearing due to concerns about the safety and security of those who make and sell hemp extracts, including CBD.

“Though we appreciate the court’s finding in favor of the legitimacy of the Farm Bill’s hemp amendment, we are still disappointed with the court’s findings that the final rule does not interfere with lawful, hemp-related business activities, as even 29 members of Congress confirmed in their Amicus Brief to the Court,” Hoban wrote. “Given the pervasive confusion and irreconcilable conflicts of the law that have led to product seizures, arrests and criminal charges against those involved in the lawful hemp industry, the petitioners believe that the final rule must be invalidated, absent the court clarifying and further resolving these conflicts and their severe consequences.”

Interestingly, an advisory committee for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in mid-April approved the first pharmaceutical grade cannabidiol (CBD) medicine to treat severe epilepsy. In a unanimous decision, the committee voted to recommend GW Pharmaceuticals drug Epidiolex for approval.

There is a clear movement afoot to take a natural product like CBD oil and turn it into an FDA approved drug—something that clearly has the potential to limit the access people have to a natural medicine. Motherboard reported last year on the drug industry lobbying for legislation that would outlaw CBD oil by classifying it as a drug.

The report also noted that “corporate lobbyists in more than 20 states are currently pushing to make sure the pharmaceutical industry has the only legal supply of CBD.” Thus, it appears the Big Pharma takeover of CBD is well underway.

Last month Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced legislation that would legalize hemp as an agricultural product. The Hemp Farming Act of 2018 would also remove the product from the federal government’s schedule of controlled substances while authorizing it to be sold as an agricultural commodity. The bill is co-sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden and Rand Paul.

Forward-thinking lawmakers in cannabis-friendly Colorado have already passed a bill to regulate hemp products, including CBD, like food products. The bill currently awaits the signature of Gov. John Hickenlooper.

The DEA countered by claiming that they had simply provided clarification to existing law, stating that their move “makes no substantive change to the government’s control of any substance.”

Rather than acknowledge the distinct difference between industrial hemp, which contains virtually no psychoactive properties, and THC-laden marijuana that produce strong psychoactive effects, the DEA argued that CBD is made from the flowering parts of the cannabis plant, and cannabinoids “are found in the parts of the cannabis plant that fall within the … definition of marijuana, such as the flowering tops, resin, and leaves.”

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that the DEA had the authority to clarify CBD as a “marijuana extract,” but CBD producers vowed to appeal the decision.

“We will be appealing, and we will be funding that appeal,” said Michael Brubeck, CEO of Centuria Natural Foods and a plaintiff in the case. Centuria was joined in its challenge by the Hemp Industries Association.

In the decision, the three-judge panel said the plaintiffs had failed to take the opportunity to comment during the DEA’s rule-making process, thus nullifying the majority of their challenge to the classification.

Additionally, the court said the rule was not in violation of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (Farm Bill), which contained industrial hemp provisions that defined hemp as cannabis sativa L. plants with less than 0.3 percent concentration of psychoactive THC.

Attorney Bob Hoban, in a statement on Wednesday, said his clients are weighing whether to request a rehearing due to concerns about the safety and security of those who make and sell hemp extracts, including CBD.

“Though we appreciate the court’s finding in favor of the legitimacy of the Farm Bill’s hemp amendment, we are still disappointed with the court’s findings that the final rule does not interfere with lawful, hemp-related business activities, as even 29 members of Congress confirmed in their Amicus Brief to the Court,” Hoban wrote. “Given the pervasive confusion and irreconcilable conflicts of the law that have led to product seizures, arrests and criminal charges against those involved in the lawful hemp industry, the petitioners believe that the final rule must be invalidated, absent the court clarifying and further resolving these conflicts and their severe consequences.”

Interestingly, an advisory committee for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in mid-April approved the first pharmaceutical grade cannabidiol (CBD) medicine to treat severe epilepsy. In a unanimous decision, the committee voted to recommend GW Pharmaceuticals drug Epidiolex for approval.

There is a clear movement afoot to take a natural product like CBD oil and turn it into an FDA approved drug—something that clearly has the potential to limit the access people have to a natural medicine. Motherboard reported last year on the drug industry lobbying for legislation that would outlaw CBD oil by classifying it as a drug.

The report also noted that “corporate lobbyists in more than 20 states are currently pushing to make sure the pharmaceutical industry has the only legal supply of CBD.” Thus, it appears the Big Pharma takeover of CBD is well underway.

Last month Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell announced legislation that would legalize hemp as an agricultural product. The Hemp Farming Act of 2018 would also remove the product from the federal government’s schedule of controlled substances while authorizing it to be sold as an agricultural commodity. The bill is co-sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden and Rand Paul.

Forward-thinking lawmakers in cannabis-friendly Colorado have already passed a bill to regulate hemp products, including CBD, like food products. The bill currently awaits the signature of Gov. John Hickenlooper.

Source:https://yournewswire.com/court-big-p...medical-value/
]]>SupplementsArnoldhttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81522-Federal-Court-Sides-With-Big-Pharma-Rules-CBD-Has-No-Medical-Valuehttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81289-What-s-in-your-shaker?goto=newpost
Wed, 02 May 2018 00:50:04 GMTWhat are guys using these days for pre workout powders?

I have used the same pre workout for years and it still works great but, I'm curious if anything new has come out.....

I don't mean something packed with caffeine and fucking dmaa either.

Pump, focus.

I knew a few companies were experimenting with racetams and such but haven't tried any of those.
]]>SupplementsMontego1http://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81289-What-s-in-your-shakerIntra shakeshttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81254-Intra-shakes?goto=newpost
Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:53:11 GMTCurious if a lot of people use them?
If so what's in yours?
Best combinations for maximum benefits?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
]]>Supplementsknuckles614http://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81254-Intra-shakesBCAAS or EAAS????http://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81243-BCAAS-or-EAAS?goto=newpost
Mon, 30 Apr 2018 04:33:20 GMTI want to keep giving fasted cardio a try and figured I’ll stick up on one of the two but which would you recommend I use for fasted cardio...I want to keep giving fasted cardio a try and figured I’ll stick up on one of the two but which would you recommend I use for fasted cardio sessions???

Standard bcaas or eaas ?
Or fuck it don’t matter?
]]>SupplementsBOGNERrockerhttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81243-BCAAS-or-EAASBCAA yay or nayhttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81164-BCAA-yay-or-nay?goto=newpost
Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:01:25 GMTCame across a post on the dark side of the web. Where Bro wings start burning by the shining light of science
What is your take on BCAAs?...Came across a post on the dark side of the web. Where Bro wings start burning by the shining light of science

What is your take on BCAAs? Personally I use them but recent research says otherwise.

Ok. Since there are still people that dont know about the uselessness (that a word?) Of BCAAs. Here's a quick reminder.

Have you heard of SARMS a.k.a. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators? It’s dubbed as a steroid alternative that’s said to be the most efficient for cycling steroids and PCT (post cycle therapy).

Today, I’ll talk about SARMS and give you the 401 to help give you a glimpse on everything there is to know about it.

What are SARMs?

The topic of SARMs (or selective androgen receptor modulators) have been a controversial one since the early 90s when they were first introduced in mainstream science. Now this isn’t to say that SARMs haven’t been around long before this period. In the 1940s, steroidal SARMs have been used for medical use in multiple diseases including cancer, hypogonadism, osteoporosis, and a number of other diseases that affect muscle and bone wasting. These SARMs had a very strong effect on muscle building due to its “high affinity”, which in non-scientific terms means it’s attraction to a receptor is high and that is what makes a chemical reaction in the body more powerful.

Unfortunately, steroidal SARMs came with side effects such as estrogen conversion causing gynecomastia (puffy sensitive nipples in men), decreased libido, and damage to the liver and kidneys (related to its methylation). Another side effect was that steroids can change the DNA of multiple cells such as the prostate and heart cause them to enlarge.

Steroidal VS Non Steroidal SARMs

In the early 1990s, scientist created a non-steroidal version of these SARMs by making them protein based. The difference between these two types of SARMs is most easily described as a lock and key system. The cells in the body act as locks and the binding sites of the cells are like key holes. Steroidal SARMs have the ability to act like a master key unlocking every cell to promote protein synthesis and growth, even in cells you don’t want to “unlock”.

Nonsteroidal SARMs are designed specifically for one type of lock, therefore, it will only affect areas of the DNA that prevent muscle and bone wastage while also promoting growth in these areas.

Nonsteroidal SARMs have been used for bodybuilding, powerlifting and a multitude of other sports since the start of it popularity. Their benefit to side effect ratio have been tested since the 1990s with no evidence suggesting harm. This breakthrough in scientific technology continues to suggest SARMs is the future of anabolics and will eventually replace steroid therapy.

Now this is not to say that nonsteroidal SARMs are the answers to all our problems. Although a protein based SARMs have very limited side effects with large benefits for strength and muscle gains, they also require a much longer period of use and cannot yet compare to the effectiveness of a steroid. The comparison of benefits and unwanted side effects have been researched for decades.

Unlike testosterone cypionate, SARMS are more than 200 times more powerful in muscle stimulation and 80 times more selective for muscle.

SARMS vs. Prohormones

Prohormones were the first ones introduced to the market. However, steroids or testosterone supplements don’t have the muscle growth effects of authentic steroids and they carry the same adverse side effects making them unsafe for human use.

Meanwhile, SARMS are an upgrade of anabolic steroids. It can be administered orally, minimizing the effects in testosterone blood levels. SARMS are also believed to cure various diseases which steroids and other medicines treated earlier. It also shows promise to replace androgen which can yield similar desirable results on muscle tissue as steroids.

According to a study conducted by the World Anti-doping Agency (WADA), approximately tenth of the worlds athletic population uses SARMS (particularly Ostarine) to enhance their body and performance (which is considered a safe performance boost).

Studies have shown the ability of SARMs to increase muscle and bone mass dramatically in animals while having no adverse impact on the prostate. Phase I trials of SARMs in humans have also reported significant increases in lean muscle mass. The two most talked about SARMs among bodybuilders are SARM S-4 a.k.a. Acetamidoxolutamide and SARM S-1: a.k.a. Ostarine or MK 2866.

How Do SARMS Work?

As we age, our endurance, power and skeletal muscle mass deteriorates due to the loss of type 2 muscle fibers. This hinders individuals to function normally. With SARMS, skeletal muscle mass and strength in androgen-deficient people can be enhanced.

There are 2 types of administering SARMS – orally or in injectable dosages. The anabolic effect is expected to be the same as testosterone. Moreover, it’s also said to produce dose-dependent improvements in bone mineral density and motorized strength apart from the ability to decrease body fat and increase lean body mass.

SARMS link to the same receptors that old steroids such as Dianabol and testosterone would connect to, but minus the drawbacks and side effects of traditional steroids and prohormones. This is a fresh start in the advancement of muscle pharmacology as SARMS can help enhance muscle mass, while helping you reduce body fat and boost athletic performance beyond your imagination.

The Most Popular SARMS

There are many SARMS, but here are the 4 main SARMS that are currently offered and most applicable to athletes, bodybuilders and fitness enthusiasts:

LGD-4033 – a potent, non-steroidal bodybuilding supplement for enhancing lean muscle mass and reducing body fat
Ostarine (MK-2866) – selective for anabolic activity at certain ARs, great for maintaining and increasing lean body mass and recomping
S4 (Andarine) – selective for bone tissue (mostly low virilization), aimed to cure osteoporosis and won’t produce the development of prostate and other secondary sexual organs
RAD140 – this is probably one of the most exciting SARMs, as well as the most current. In fact, aside from the muscle building effects seems to look like a possible cure for Alzheimer.
Other compounds like GW 501516 (Cardarine) considered the kind of endurance supplements and SR9009 are usually grouped with SARMs, but are not the same.

The Benefits of SARMS

SARMS is believed to have the capacity to employ the benefits of anabolic supplements while reducing the side effects of steroids.

Muscle loss prevention (during cutting period)
Lean muscle development
Improved strength
Faster injury recovery
Joint healing abilities
PCT use following anabolics
Let’s a took at a few of these benefits in more detail…

Increased muscle strength

In the Asian Journal of Andrology, subjects increased muscle strength 20x more than those in the placebo group. Subjects continued to gain strength and size in muscle tissue for up to 5 months but with significant decreases in effectiveness after the 3rd month (Dalton et al, 2014).

Increased muscle size

Deductive evidence has proven a significant increase in muscle tissue hypertrophy (growth of muscle tissue). Inductive evidence suggests subjects will gain between 3 to 15 lbs of muscle tissue over the a 12 week period (Dubois et al, 2015). The amount of muscle hypertrophy is dependent on diet, training, and the characteristics of the SARM. Mild SARMs such as MK2866 will range much lower in hypertrophy than more potent SARMs such as RAD140 or LGD4033.

Tissue selectivity

According to the Oxford Academic journal of Endocrinology, nonsteroidal SARMs have been designed to attach itself to area of the DNA responsible for skeletal muscle protein synthesis. Unlike other anabolic agents, non steroidal SARMs do not affect any other tissues in the body (Dubois et al, 2015).

Inhibits cancer cell division

In an unrelated study to muscle growth performed by the Public Library of Science’s (PLOS) Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal, nonsteroidal SARMs have been studied for its effects on breast cancer. Androgen receptors are known to play a pivotal role in the treatment of breast cancer and due to the inability for nonsteroidal SARMs to convert to estrogen, there is a very narrow probability for negative repercussions. The results have not only confirmed that tumor cells decrease in weight by 90%, but it may even inhibit the potential for breast cancer development (Dalton et al, 2014).

Regulation of libido

Recent studies have indicated healthy increases in sexual desire in both men and women with the use of nonsteroidal SARMs. The males with hypogonadism, testosterone therapy is a common practice. In testosterone therapy there are many side effects that result is severe consequences for the user, such as thickening of the blood (commonly causing strokes and heart attacks), enlargement or development of cancer on the prostate, and gynecomastia (characterized as the development of female breast on men) due to an overproduction of estrogen. A 2014 article published by the Asian Journal of Andrology stated “SARM’s beneficial pharmacology and desirable pharmacokinetics offer considerable promise in the treatment of late onset hypogonadism. The convenience of once daily oral therapy combined with defined safety margins surrounding a proven efficacious dosage form may one day challenge testosterone replacement therapy as the gold standard in treating late onset hypogonadism” (Dalton et al, 2014).

In the Oxford Journal of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, the popular nonsteroidal SARM LGD 4033 (Ligandrol) has been recently studied for it’s effectiveness and safety in healthy young men. Results were favorable indicated by hormone and lipid levels returning to normal without the use of a post cycle therapy. No dangers were detected throughout the study. although there was noticeable suppression in testosterone and HDL cholesterol, it was not significant enough to cause adverse reactions. Because LGD 4033 is considered one of the strongest and most potent nonsteroidal SARMs available, it is not likely that less potent SARMs will produce any harmful effects (Bhasin, 2010).

Side Effects of SARMS

What’s great about SARMS is that its side effects are minimal, so you don’t have to worry about any negative effects. If you overdo it, however, some people may experience shut down or even gynecomastia if currently predisposed to it.

Be responsible, and in 99.9% of cases users will not have any side effects from the use of SARMs. Current research has so far agreed with that conclusion.

Where to Buy Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Online
There are many manufacturers selling SARMs online right now. Although they are not legal for human consumption, you can buy them from many research labs to experiment with your rat.

There are multiple companies selling SARMs online, and the only place I’ve been going to has been the company Innovative Research Chemicals. In fact, as of January 8th 2018 of this year, their popularity all over reddit and solid reputation caused them to upgrade to a bigger facility.

You can check out their homepage for a selection of SARMs and other useful compounds.

Stacking Your SARMs: Your Best Options

When it comes to SARMs, many people stack more than 1 at a time to maximize their results even further. Since in most cases you won’t experience any side effects using SARMs, you can safely stack multiple compounds and do a total recomp of your physique.

Popular stacks for SARMs include:

LGD 4033 + MK 677
GW 501516 + MK 2866
SR 9009 + S23

Liquid SARMs are harder to stack because of the pure taste and inconvenience of having to measure it out multiple times a day. Plus it tends to be much more expensive. That’s why capsules are your best bet for stacking, while liquids are best for taking one SARM at a time.

SARMs: Our Final Review

With SARMS showing great promise for selective high anabolic muscle activity and in preventing muscle wasting and age related illnesses without the negative side effects associated with anabolic steroids and prohormones, SARMS could be the next big thing. The IOC (International Olympic Committee) is even preparing for the use of SARMS with Olympic athletes. It’s Anabolics 3.0 and the “Universal Soldier Formula” of the future!

Washington, DC— US Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) introduced the SARMs Control Act of 2018. Selective androgen receptor modulators, or SARMs, are synthetic drugs designed to mimic the effects of testosterone. This bipartisan bill builds on the success of the Designer Anabolic Steroids Control Act of 2014 by extending the Drug Enforcement Administration’s authority to regulate anabolic steroids to include SARMs.

SARMs are associated with serious safety concerns, including the potential to increase the risk of heart attack or stroke and life-threatening reactions like liver damage. They are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for human use, they are illegally marketed and sold as dietary supplements, and they are banned in all professional and college sports.

“SARMs are synthetic drugs that have negative effects similar to those of anabolic steroids,” Hatch said. “Even though SARMS are not approved by the FDA for human use and pose the same safety risks as anabolic steroids, they have proliferated under a regime in which they are not subject to the same controls. The SARMs Control Act closes this loophole to ensure that the DEA has the authority it needs to prevent abuse and diversion of these dangerous substances.”

The legislation has received letters of support from the US Anti-Doping Agency and Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, as well as leaders of the dietary supplement industry.

Michael McGuffin, President, Herbal Products Association; Scott Melville, President & CEO, Consumer Healthcare Products Association; Steve Mister, President & CEO, Council for Responsible Nutrition; Loren Israelsen, President, United Natural Products Alliance; Travis Tygart, President & CEO, US Anti-Doping Agency:“Each of our organizations has consistently supported efforts to enact and enforce laws to protect consumers, eliminate bad actors marketing illegal substances masquerading as legal products, and prosecute criminals who manufacture and sell them. Your bill will help move toward this goal. The SARMs Control Act is a bold step, adding teeth to prevention and enforcement efforts in the battle against illegal substances being marketed as legitimate products. The dietary supplement industry and USADA stands ready to work with you and all of Congress to deliver a strong bill to the President.”

Dominick L. Strokes, Vice President for Legislative Affairs, Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association:“FLEOA endorses this legislation giving additional authority to the Drug Enforcement Administration to enforce the illegal sales of SARMs. It is our belief this legislation will help save the lives of individuals who are unaware of the serious side effects of these supplements. We look forward to standing with you on this important bipartisan legislation.”

Background:

The FDA recently issued warning letters to three companies for distributing products that contain SARMs, noting that the products are unapproved drugs that have not been reviewed by the FDA for safety and effectiveness. The United States Anti-Doping Agency and the Department of Defense Operation Supplement Safety program warn about the risks of SARMs. Despite these enforcement actions and education efforts, SARMs are increasingly being purchased through the Internet by athletes, recreational bodybuilders, and members of the armed forces.

The SARMs Control Act of 2018 builds on the success of the Designer Anabolic Steroids Control Act of 2014 (Pub. L. No. 113-260) by extending the Drug Enforcement Administration’s authority to regulate anabolic steroids to include SARMs. Specifically, the SARMs Control Act of 2018 would:

Amend the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) to add SARMs to the list of Schedule III controlled substances, ensuring that SARMs are regulated in the same manner as anabolic steroids;
Add a definition of the term “SARM,” including a list of specified substances and a process for the Attorney General to add substances to the definition of SARM;
Prohibit importing, exporting, manufacturing, distributing, dispensing, or possessing with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense any SARM, or any product containing a SARM, unless it is properly labeled;
Add certain offenses related to SARMs to the definition of “felony drug offense” and the civil penalty provisions of the CSA; and
Require that the FDA provide to the DEA information related to dietary supplements that the FDA determines may contain a SARM, as it already does for supplements that may contain anabolic steroids.

Source:https://www.hatch.senate.gov/public/...E-23A9931C99CD
]]>SupplementsArnoldhttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81115-Hatch-Whitehouse-Introduce-Legislation-to-Empower-DEA%C2%92s-Regulation-of-SARMsCan’t F’ing sleep!http://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81109-Can%C2%92t-F%C2%92ing-sleep%21?goto=newpost
Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:03:47 GMTI’ve tried Valium, kratom, melatonin and a combination of lots of other over-the-counter sleep aids. Does anybody have a tried and true way to fall...I’ve tried Valium, kratom, melatonin and a combination of lots of other over-the-counter sleep aids. Does anybody have a tried and true way to fall to sleep at night?
]]>SupplementsHex Mad Househttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81109-Can%C2%92t-F%C2%92ing-sleep%21Best BP and cholesterol suppshttp://www.anabolicsteroidforums.com/showthread.php/81089-Best-BP-and-cholesterol-supps?goto=newpost
Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:26:15 GMTIs cialis the best thing for BP?
What’s best for cholesterol?
I’ve got red yeast rice and policosonal. Also heard niacin but my body doesn’t...Is cialis the best thing for BP?