Do McCain's liberal positions really matter when he is running against a communist?

Yes because Communists are defined by their liberalism. What you are saying doesn't make logical sense.

Quote:

Back in 1992, Ross Perot was a third party candidate. Those votes swayed the election and we got stuck with the Bill Clinton/Janet Reno ZOG regime for 8 years. I have to agree with NorthwestBound. No Obama!

Good point. But what about a war with Iran and pussyfooting around abortion (making it illegal, won't happen) and amnesty (surely he'll sneak it in sooner or later). Does this really sound like 4 years of White Nationalist progress? Does the Zionist War against Iran nullify any meaningless rhetoric he says about being anti-abortion?

Quote:

She's a conventional republican-brand governor from a conservative rural state. So was GW. Plus she's already in league with the Jews.

Sorry, but she's not the answer. And if you think she is you are going to be in for a BIG letdown.

Someone's BS filter is in full working order, Wooden Music Box!

The one thing she is going to give us (as oppose to what she inherits from John McCain) is a Presidential run with Hillary Clinton in 2012.

Surely Palin knows no more about Pegler than she does about the Bush doctrine. But the people around her do, and they will be shaping a Palin presidency. That they would inject not just Pegler’s words but spirit into their candidate’s speech shows where they’re coming from. Rick Davis, the McCain campaign manager, said that the Palin-sparked convention created “a whole new Republican Party,” but what it actually did was exhume an old one from its crypt.

So who are the people around her? Who wrote her speech? Wasn't one of us, that's for sure.

The Rich editorial implies that the GOP is reaching out to true conservatives, but the reckless way that Palin is challenging Russia to war is both stupid and presumptuous. And whose interest is she serving? Israel's, of course.

Some posters complain endlessly of the "feminization" of America, yet applaud this arrogant "Rapture bunny" nitwit as she usurps McCaine's position. Does it make any sense?

This will be the 7th time I've voted in a presidential election. Everytime, I hear the same thing about those obscure 3rd party candidates, sending messages to a deaf and blind Washington, and the desire for sudden change. The names of the candidates change, but the core issues vary very little.
As long as the jews are holding the financial and political puppet strings change for the better will not happen. As far as what candidates say and do prior to the election, it really doesn't mean much after they get elected. I seem to remember a famous quote, "No more taxes'", then we got more taxes. Americans have been voting us into this mess for over 200 years and there is no way voting will get us out if this situation in 4-8 years. The possibility of getting into a war with Iran isn't much of an issue to me. We are already entrenched in an extremely unpopular war and I suspect that there will not be enough troops to fight one anyway. Alot of foreign policy is designed to distract attention away from failing domestic policies. This is the game the jews play. I hear alot about immigration but when I was attending the local immigration protests, where was everybody else? Not too many white people stepped up. It will be up to us to make these vermin feel unwelcome and leave the country on their own accord. Don't expect the government to lift a finger.

Everything in the American financial, economic and commercial world is being manipulated, sugar-coated, if you will, but all hell will break loose after the election: first of all chimpouts if Obama wins, even bigger chimpouts if he loses, oil, gold, silver, food, utility costs, clothing and all imported items will rise dramatically in price, banks, investment houses, major manufacturing corporations (what is left of them) will continue to fail, outsource, and/or leave for third world nations, etc, etc, etc.

All of this, and more, will happen no matter who is in office; I just don't think a communist, drug-using, homosexual, negro cuts it, but that's me.

__________________

"What we have to fight for is the freedom and independence of the fatherland, so that our people may be enabled to fulfill the mission assigned to it by the [C]reator."-Adolf Hitler

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."-Goethe

"Homosexuality is not a civil right. Its rise almost always is accompanied, as in the Weimar Republic, with a decay of society and a collapse of its basic cinder block, the family."-Patrick Buchanan

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.-Edmund Burke

"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid Galilee of its Arab population."
-- David Ben-Gurion (Founding Father of the State of Israel and First Israeli Prime Minister), from Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar (May 1948)

Left-wing feminists have a hard time dealing with strong, successful conservative women in politics such as Margaret Thatcher. Sarah Palin seems to have truly unhinged more than a few, eliciting a stream of vicious, often misogynist invective.

On Salon.com last week, Cintra Wilson branded her a "Christian Stepford Wife" and a "Republican blow-up doll." Wendy Doniger, religion professor at the University of Chicago Divinity School, added on the Washington Post blog, "Her greatest hypocrisy is in her pretense that she is a woman."

You'd think that, whether or not they agree with her politics, feminists would at least applaud Mrs. Palin as a living example of one of their core principles: a woman's right to have a career and a family. Yet some feminists unabashedly suggest that her decision to seek the vice presidency makes her a bad and selfish mother. Others argue that she is bad for working mothers because she's just too good at having it all.

The presidential campaign has turned into a high-profile version of the mommy wars.

That’s because women are the key swing voters in the election, and John McCain’s selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has stoked the long-simmering class war among women.

But there is a twist this time: In the hot seat is a conservative Republican woman who is anathema to the traditional feminist groups and female politicians representing the feminist movement.

This disconnect between Gov. Palin and her outspoken female critics has to do with their — and her — politics, which, to understate it, are mammoth.

She is an absolutist in wanting to ban all abortions, while they generally oppose restrictions on the procedure.

But it goes much, much further. It involves lifestyle and cultural differences that have made women’s reactions to Gov. Palin’s vice presidential candidacy something of a Rorschach test.

The traditional women’s groups and Democratic-aligned women are understandably worried that if she is elected, the face of American feminism will be a gun-toting, sexual abstinence-teaching, abortion-opposing Wal-Mart shopper.

She doesn’t eat sushi like they do, but she does catch salmon.

This election will go a long way toward settling the question of whether groups that purport to speak for American women really do, or merely represent a narrow band of those who tend to be politically active, upper-middle-class and left-leaning.