funsho2 wrote:Cousins is not RG3....RG3 have not turn over the ball like luck this year thats one of the thing that makes him special....kirk will turn the ball over vs a great browns defense.....and we will lose at a critical time....michael jordan played while he was sick....if rg3 can go lets go....these are critical games....if we win out we will win either the division or a wild card spot

Get hold of yourself.

Kirk will play if he needs to. We will fight and may win or lose either way.

It will be a tough game and there are NO GUARANTEES whether RGIII plays or not, or whether Kirk plays or not.

Daniel Snyder has defined incompetence, failure and greed to true Washington Redskins fans for over a decade and a half. Stay away from football operations !!!

I'm not worried. Even if Cousins is the guy on Sunday, he does not seem out of place on the field. You usually worry about the play being too fast for a rookie coming off the bench, but he has looked very comfortable in his limited time out there. We may win, we may lose, but I would venture a guess that Cousins will be ready.

The Browns are a lot like us in a way - they are not as bad as their record or their recent history suggests

This game IMO will be a little harder for us it is an away game - the fans will be excited to see RG3 and to see their team take the Redskins down

IF we continue to play as we have the last few games, we'll win

The Redskins no longer are trying to be competitive and hoping to win

these Redskins are playing to win each and every game

until Dan Snyder lets NFL people make ALL the decisions on who coaches & plays, we will be a mediocre franchise each season starts with high hopes & expectations - & ends with us knowing we should have done better with who we have

Do u guys know what happened to the last two teams that got hot at the right time? They won the superbowl ....redskins are hot ...if we get to the playoffs with this streak ...we will end up in the superbowl....dont break the rhythm

I think I'd rather send Cousins out there than an injured RG3. Our pistol option game works because of the threat of RG3 slipping out and running. If the knee causes him to lose a step, that aspect of our offense is gone.

Maybe we'll see how well RG3 can run a traditional offense in the NFL without the option run trickery? I'm looking forward to it.

PAPDOG67 wrote:No one said the Browns are a joke, but at the end of the day they are 5-8....hence, very beatable.

Flawless logic......

HOWEVER, they are 5-3 in their last 8 and 4-3 at home.

It isn't as simple as looking at their record. We are at a point in the season where momentum starts to factor in...... and CLE has momentum.

That said, CLE matches up well with us. Offensively they have an inconsistent rookie QB and a below average running game. In order for our 2ndary to hold their own, they need to play against an inaccurate QB prone to making mistakes (doesn't everyones, I know but even more so for us). They have that in Weeden. Richardson is also averaging only 3.3 ypc over the past 5 games.

CLE has a good D, but they haven't exactly been playing the NFL best as of late against a Roth-less PIT, then OAK, and KC. Regardless, we'll need to score early to take control of the game since it is played away. I think that is why RGIII is so important. But if he's not ready, then we can't force him back.

All in all, I think CLE is our game to lose --- BUT they aren't playing like a 5-8 MIA or BUF. So I wouldn't go out there and say CLE is a team playing like a 5-8 squad. They are playing better.

LOL the best part is some of you sound just like Cincy fans that we beat, or Steel3r fans of San Diego fans Oakland and KC suck. We have lost three games this year in the last 45 seconds of the game. I bet if we just one 1 or 2 of these games you would not be feeling that great.

1. You do not have a better RB
2. You do have a better QB
3. You do have better core of WRs, but Gordon is better than all of them
4. We have better o-line and D-line

Again you get respect when you win, the Browns are starting to earn respect around the league. Without RG3 your team is ...you just have to look over the past 10 years to prove that.

DOGSRBACK wrote:1. You do not have a better RB2. You do have a better QB3. You do have better core of WRs, but Gordon is better than all of them4. We have better o-line and D-line.

1. 359 more yards on six more carries for Morris says different.
2. Agreed
3. Garcon is better than Gordon, but I'll give you the rest.
4. With our injuries, I'll give you the D line, but you are incorrect on the O line.
Your score: One and a half out of four, Not too good.