Alternative Right's own Richard Wolstencroft was recently invited to submit a video on Cultural Marxism to the National Critical Lawyers' Conference 2016. The National Critical Lawyers' Group is a left-leaning UK organization that seeks to "critique" the role of law in shaping society, economics, and politics. Among the questions Richard answered are: "What is Cultural Marxism and how did it come about?" "How do you relate it to the accusation of bad conscience on the Left?" "How worried should the Left be about Cultural Marxism?" "Is there a cultural Nietzscheanism?" and "Can Far Left and Far Right combine and join forces?"

Being a direct descendant of Yazidis, through my paternal lineage, the call of the blood, the call of the Heimat, the call of my own people is strong. My grandfather's last name was and still is El Yazidi, and being the man I am – a Yazidi born in Africa – it pains me to see and hear all the stories of how the daughters of my ethnicity are enslaved, sold for sex slaves, consumed in their captivity to death because of their religion, because of the way they look, at the hands of Islamic Jihadists.

A few weeks ago, someone I work with invited me to attend her citizenship ceremony. I told her I would go, and I did. Another young lady I know was also receiving Canadian citizenship at this same ceremony.

I figured it might be interesting to observe a citizenship ceremony, since I’d never observed one before. It was something of a STIHIE experience for me. Of course, I knew what to expect. There were 70 new Canadian citizens: most of them were Africans, and most of the rest were Middle Eastern. And all of the speeches were filled to the brim with the usual liberal democratic dogmas about freedom, tolerance, and multiculturalism.

Jared Taylor's speech at the recent American Renaissance conference, dealing with the important issue of why many Whites lie to themselves about race, and double down on their denials even when repeatedly proved wrong by experience.

Liberalism represents the triumph of the sovereign individual’s freedom based on desire over the community’s order based on duties.
A few hundred years of liberal political hegemony in the West (England, France, and the United States primarily) have resulted in a total cultural hegemonic apparatus always affirming its own biases with pretensions of objectivity.

Lionel Mordecai Trilling, in his preface to The Liberal Imagination, wrote that Liberalism is the “sole intellectual tradition” of the United States.

The main weakness
of modern self-help books, as opposed to those written in antiquity by the
likes of Seneca and Marcus Aurelius, is that they begin not from truth but from
the desires and aspirations of the multitude. Far from a teacher pointing the
way toward virtue, the modern “self-help guru” is reduced to a servant, cannibalising
certain philosophical techniques in order to help people achieve money,
“success”, and heightened endorphin production more effectively. But there is
at least one modern self-help book that in its essential content harks back to
the older tradition, and that book is Radical Honesty, written by a Texan
psychotherapist named Brad Blanton who describes himself as “white trash with a
Ph.D.”.

The
self-help method of Radical Honesty and
its sequel Practicing Radical Honesty
is simple: tell the truth, about
everything, all the time, without lying or withholding anything. It is
important to emphasise that Blanton does not advocate this commitment to
honesty out of a moral opposition to lying. Rather, working back to traditional
virtues through modern utilitarianism, he sees radical honesty as the only truly effective therapeutic
path to health and happiness.

Biohistory and r/K theory are two of the
hottest new socio-biological theories. This article will summarize these theories. The next article, part two, will compare and
contrast them from a culturist point of view – that is with an eye to how each
can help us protect, guide and revive western culture. But first, we must know what each theory
entails. So, this article will summarize them, without much commentary.

Those of us who were right about Trump are starting to become a new species of bore. Since last Summer, I have been confidently telling everyone around me that Trump would beat the rest of the Republican field and then move on to wipe the floor with whoever the Democratic Party threw up – "Horrible" Hillary or "Bonkers" Bernie (all the time being pretty confident that it would be Hillary). Now the latest polls are starting to show this pattern with Trump pulling ahead of Hillary in head-to-heads. Yes, people are starting to get sick of hearing how right I was.

The recent meteoric rise of Donald Trump has served to temporarily mask that fact that we nationalists in America are dreadfully lagging our brothers abroad in Europe. I’ll spare the reader yet another volume in the ever-growing library of Trumpology, but what is clear is that he serves as a break from, an exception to, and a cult of personality in opposition to the rest of America’s political landscape. Trump is exceptional.

Austrian politician Norbert Hofer is not exceptional, save perhaps for being an exceptionally disciplined and loyal member of his large and well-organized far-right political party. His success certainly has parallels with Trump’s success, but a key difference remains. Hofer stands as a conventional representative of his party and the political climate surrounding it, while Trump exists independently of all of America’s party and political infrastructure. While the far-right politicians throughout Europe have relatively mature and deep political machines to rely on, Trump has had to settle for imageboard teens, social media trolls, his own billionaire coffers, and his own skills as a gifted entertainer to relay his message.

The Philippine Elections recently concluded here in "Flipland," and the new President-Elect is a guy named Rodrigo “The Punisher” Duterte, a political outsider who skyrocketed to fame partly due to widespread public dissatisfaction with establishment politics (which in the Philippines’ context is synonymous with oligarchical politics) and partly due to his assertive, no-nonsense, alpha-as-fuck charisma.

Duterte originally never wanted to run for president. He only entered the election after he was forced to do so by his many supporters. Thus, his rise to national fame is the result of push factors (he was pushed into office) instead of the usual pull factors (i.e. trying to attract as much political capital from as many different directions as possible). Like Trump, Duterte represents something relatively new to Philippine politics, because he invalidated the assumptions of the ruling political class and exposed the weakness of the political establishment.

A recent Google "doodle" featured an obscure Japanese woman called Yuri Kochiyama, who – the image implied – was in some way connected to the overused abstract noun "EQUALITY."

This was deliciously ironic, as I then used that same company, Google, which has an almost monopolistic dominance of internet searches, to link to Wikipedia, a crowd-sourced entity that has a similarly dominant position with regard to online reference, to find out more. So much for "equality"!

This article was originally published at Alternative Right on the 26th of August, 2013. It is based on an earlier article published in the October 2005 issue of Identity, the magazine of the BNP that John Bean edited for several years. This version includes some input from Roger Pearson, a Professor of Anthropology, particularly in the section on the origins of European man.

When the Human Genome Project was completed in 2000, it was widely touted that its result showed no genetic basis for race. In fact some scientists of the liberal-left consensus went so far as to dub race a “biological fiction.” Developments since then have clearly demonstrated that quite small genetic differences can produce disproportionate results that substantiate the fact that racial differences are a reality and that they are more complex than just differences in skin colour and hair texture.

Britain’s world heavyweight champion, Tyson Fury is in trouble again after making some comments that (1) stated that Jews control the media and the banking system and (2) imply that they use this power to brainwash people into passively following the government. This, of course, also implies that Jews control the government.

Alternative Right's regular contributor Alex Fontana interviews the near legendary E. Michael Jones, an important Catholic critic of American society, well known for his book The Slaughter of Cities, which details the post-war destruction of America’s White ethnic neighbourhoods and communities as a deliberate policy by WASP and Jewish elites.

Among many subjects discussed are the rigged political system, suburbanization as social control, the Black-Jewish alliance, Hollywood, and the rise of Donald Trump.

I realize, belatedly, that for most people in the world every issue splits to two options. Either you are pro-“racist,” or anti-“racist,” and things of that type.

I cannot relate to this. I grew up in the South and was taught since my earliest years to be a gentleman. That means a man who speaks the truth without reservation, but also without emotion, including the type of outburst we consider “emotion” but more properly is known as revenge.

Great tidings have come to us from across the sea, from the land of the infidels in the Northern Island beyond the Franks, that our Islamic son, Saddiq of Khan, has won a great victory over the pork-eaters, and has been elected by the kufars and the unbelievers to the Emirate of Londinistan, where already we are raising great mosques and minarets to call the faithful to prayer, and where already we are teaching the sons of donkeys of the English to lower their eyes and beer cans before the beloved of Allah.

He’s Che Guevara underneath his red beret. He’s Leon Trotsky with his belly full of bagels, this man, this very sensitive man, so finely bred on Marx and Marcuse, who sits over cups of steaming cappuccino, butt-hole tight from doing kegels, mouth sore from nights spent moaning, from days spent dreaming of equality for every woman, black, and gay, and all the ghetto commissars inside his head.

London just elected a Muslim mayor. Sadiq Khan, formerly the Member of Parliament for Tooting, now represents almost 9 million people in London, a city that has been utterly transformed as a result of decades of mass immigration, failed policies of state-sponsored multiculturalism and, more recently, social engineering.

The election of Mr Khan marks the complete transformation of our capital city and urban Britain as a whole. The new London Mayor, who won by double-digit percentage points, hit headlines recently after it was exposed he had shared a platform with five Islamic extremists. At a 2004 event in the Tooting Islamic Centre, Khan shared a stage with a Hamas supporter, and a preacher by the name of Suliman Gani who openly supported an Islamic state.

Six years ago, Maclean’s (Canada’s national weekly current affairs and news magazine) labeled Quebec “the most corrupt province” of Canada. At that time, the Liberal government led by Jean Charest also launched an inquiry to investigate corruption in the judge nomination process. A year later, the same government had to set up another committee, this time dealing with the construction business. The corruption proved to be widespread, both at the city and provincial levels, with contracts being given according to the donations received by the party. And the mob got its share as well, to reward it for playing the role of middleman between crooked politicians and greedy entrepreneurs.

Earlier this week a number of elections below the UK state parliamentary level were held in Britain. This included elections for the Scottish Parliament, the Welsh Assembly, some local councils, and the mayor of London.

Usually midterm elections favour the chief opposition party, which in this case is the Labour Party, with its recently-elected leader, the extreme Leftist, Jeremy Corbyn. This time they didn’t. Instead of winning hundreds of council seats as is usual, Labour actually lost a handful, as well as control of one council Dudley in the West Midlands (population 312,900 – 93% White).

As a matter of anthropological study, I have compiled a brief summary of the types of white leftists one generally encounters today. While many other types may exist, I believe they can largely be described as versions or admixtures of these basic types.

In physical characteristics these types differ, however they tend to share certain bovine facial expressions, an earnest vapidity about the eyes. They are quick to anger (triggered) and generally unable to cope with truths that are socially awkward. I have tried to list them in order of danger, from least to greatest, with my choice of the seemingly banal 'incidental Marxist' as most dangerous due to his prevalence, and being largely unaware he is espousing Marxist ideas at all.

The Deformation of the Conservative Movement

There has been a long gap between the first copy of Radix Journal and the second one, which has recently appeared in print a good three years later. Compared to its predecessor, which clocked in at 300 pages, concentrated on the possibly overambitious theme of the "deconstruction of White European identity," and even sent Andy Nowicki on an all-expenses-paid trip to report on the "Rainbow Nation" of South Africa, Radix II—The Great Purge: The Deformation of the Conservative Movement has a narrower focus — namely the history of the American Conservative movement — as well as a lower page count (206 pages). This might seem like a case of the journal’s publisher and editor, Richard Spencer, drawing in his horns.

Surely the exercise of psychological control, as wielded by the contemporary elite, is not an exact science; indeed, it is probably more of an art than a science. Still, it cannot be doubted that man is indeed an easily exploitable creature; there is no “one size fits all” manner of exercising dominion, as each individual is at least to some degree unique—to control for the quirks in absolutely everyone’s programming would be costly and time-consuming. Yet there does exist a baseline for control, a way of dominating the thoughts of the mass of men (even if some men manage to escape this widely-cast net), of strafing this weary load of penned-up souls with a barrage of stimuli to the extent that their minds are blown and their hearts are wrenched in a manner that aids and abets their psychological enslavement.

In a classic 1995 article for American Renaissance, Michael W. Masters defended the “morality of survival” against what he saw as the self-destructive universalism of the Western peoples, arguing that morality should instead be practiced according to an in-group/out-group distinction.

This position has clearly been inherited by many on the Alt-Right, who propose to solve the problem of white passivity in the face of dispossession by narrowing our moral horizons. In this view, universalist ideals drive whites to engage in indiscriminate altruism towards other peoples at the expense of their own kith and kin; thus, whites need to do their best to forget about moral standards that encompass the whole of humanity, and revert to the “morality of the tribe” in which altruism is restricted to one’s genetic in-group and enmity or indifference are shown to those outside it.

The May Queen. We celebrate her appearance and her blossoming forth at this time of the year through Walpurgis observances, May Day faires, and Beltaine festivities. We’ve always known her, whether she is called by her ancient names of Flora, Maia, or Freya or the relatively modern names of Godiva, Guinevere, or Marian.

The Welsh legend of Blodewedd (which is pronounced almost as it looks: bloody-weth) is not so well known, but Blodewedd—of all the incarnations of this Spring Earth Goddess—is the most splendidly interesting May Queen of them all.