In regard to origins, there are only two possibilities. Eithersomeone made everything or everything made itself. There are no alternatives.

In our world today, evolutionary theory (of which there arethree commonly accepted varieties: Darwinian, neo-Darwinian, and saltation) stands as the chief representative
of one position. Creationism is the other position.

Someone may ask, “What about pantheism and
Gaea?”Pantheism declares that everything is god, and the Gaea theory fancifully says that
our world is a god. Since both teach that matter made itself, they are just forms of evolution.

So there are two possible ways that matter, stellar objects,
plants and animals came into existence. Only two.

How can we know which is
correct? One way is by observingthe things of nature. We call
that science. That is what researchers do.

This Siteprovides you with thousands of items of data fromscientific
research and observation. It clearly establishes that evolution cannot possibly be the causal agent of matter, objects, or
life(See Life DNA Protein and Fossils).

That leaves us with Creationism as the only means by whicheverything
came into existence.

Someone will ask, “But what are the evidences thatCreationism
is true?” There are two.

First,
the only alternative is clearly disproved by a massiveamount of findings.

Second,—and
if possible —even more solid, we have the veryexistence of everything about us! Whether
it be the whirling of electrons in the atom, the orbit of our world which mysteriously does not decay and crash us into the
sun, or the existence of a living creature.

Can anyone, viewing a hummingbird in action and knowingthat all its
hundreds of organs are packed inside something the size of a marble, believe the myth that, way back, it originated when a
lightning bolt hit some dirty seawater?

Come now, not even a four-year-old would believe that one.

Not evolution, but a creative act of God brought everythinginto existence.........in
6 days which is our pattern for a daily week i.e. 6 days plus one more in which God "rested".This is the seven day week which
everyone in the world aligns themselves to.I wonder why that is the case? Well read on...

The mountain of scientific data now available to us also narrows the range of that Creation act. It obviously occurred
ratherrecently, only within the last few thousand years. We know this because
the condition and arrangement of sedimentary strata(see fossils) show it was rapidly laid down by a worldwide Flood only a few millenniums ago . We also know it because of 58 (see Age of earth) dramatic findings that our world is youthful.

Other types of scientific evidence establish the fact that, contrary to what some Christians suggest, no evolving
from one species to another has occurred. The original species remain intact, but they have produced many sub-species.See Natural Selection

Although neither the book of Genesis nor any other part of theBible is used in the siteas scientific evidence, we should note that those Christians who choose to
embrace evolutionary theory deny the reality of the Genesis accounts of the Creation and the Flood. If we cannot trust Genesis,
what can we trust?

In addition, according to the Bible, sin and death began after
the fall of Adam and Eve. But that important truth would benegated by the theory that savagery,
violence, and sudden killing reigned for millions of years on our planet before Adam and Eve came into existence.

So that brings us back to two views of origins, evolution orCreation—only two. By accepting the one, we reject the other. They cannot be blended.

“I have often thought how little I should like
to have to prove organic evolution in a court of law.”—*Errol White,Proceedings of the Linnean Society, London (1966) [an ichthyologist (expert on fish) in a 1988 address before a meeting of the
Linnean Society in London].

“I doubt if there is any single individual within the
scientific community who could cope with the full range of[creationist] arguments
without the help of an army of consultants inspecial fields.”—*David M. Raup, “Geology
and Creation,” Bulletin of the Field Museum of Natural History, Vol. 54, March 1983, p. 18.

“The evolutionary establishment fears creation science,
because evolution itself crumbles when challenged byevidence. In the 1970s and 1980s, hundreds
of public debates were arranged between evolutionary scientists and creation scientists. The latter scored resounding victories,
with the result that, today, few evolutionists will debate. Isaac Asimov, Stephen Jay Gould, and the late Carl Sagan, while
highly critical of creationism, all declined to debate.”—James Perloff, Tornado in a Junkyard (1999), p. 241.

“No one has ever found an organism that is known not
tohave parents, or a parent. This is the strongest evidence on behalf of evolution.”—*Tom
Bethell, “Agnostic Evolutionists,” Harper’s, February 1985, p. 61.

“As by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must
have existed. Why do we not find them embedded in the crust of the earth?Why is not all nature in confusion instead of being, as we see
them, well-defined species?”—*Charles Darwin, quoted in H. Enoch, Evolution or Creation (1866), p. 139.

“Evolution became in a sense a scientific
religion; almost all scientists have accepted it andmany are prepared to bend their observations to fit in with it.”—*H. Lipson, “A Physicist Looks at Evolution,” Physics Bulletin 31 (1980), p. 138