Editorials

How free is free choice?

How free is free choice? This has been one of those questions which is simple sounding but one which has trouble many of the most brilliant minds through the ages, and indeed has been one of the preoccupation of most religions. Perhaps this has to do with the certainty of death and that whatever one does, there is just one ultimate answer – nothing is forever. If this is the final destination of all, there the realisation is also of a hierarchy of meta-narratives which enveloping and predetermining smaller historical narratives within them. In the postcolonial world, this inescapable historical predicament was forged by what may indeed be the one most important event in the modern era – colonialism. Indeed, the importance of this event unconsciously manifests in the fact of classification of historical times with this as the central marker. Hence, apart from the colonial era we have pre and postcolonial eras etc. The assumption seems to be, all postcolonial thinking, is a product of colonialism especially if you are contemplating the issue of modernism. The trouble also is, what then can be the alternate modernism. For surely, even if colonialism did not happen, there still would be a modern.

“Colonial modernity” if it was just a convenient way of classifying a historical period, it would not have been so problematic, but it is not. It is loaded to the core with values, and this too of a very derisive nature. It implies a modernity that is a direct derivative of the dehumanizing enslavement in both material and spiritual terms that colonialism introduced, exhibiting in the process an inability to “re-people” that spiritual landscape, sapped and made barren by colonialism’s brutal aggressions – a state of mind where the formerly colonized continue to immortalize the values of their former colonizers even those that made them less than human. Much of the social stratifications, and dualities that we witness in these former colonies today, such as between tribal and non-tribal, forward and backward, etc, are supposed to be a result of this. The obvious inference is, in the non-colonized world, such stratification would have been very different, or at least not brutal.

It is difficult to agree with all of what is being put forward, although we do acknowledge there are strong elements of hangovers of the past era contaminating in the present. As for the non-colonized world offering an alternative to an exploitative system of society, we totally disagree. Thailand is one case. The country was never colonized, but it treats its peripheral citizenry worse than many former colonies do. A former foreign minister of the country whom IFP interacted in Guwahati some years ago confirmed this, when he said that many of its “indigenous” populations have not even been given citizenship of the kingdom and that only about the last decade the country’s cabinet met to decide whether it should be considered that this section of its own population be allowed to vote or enjoy the other citizenship rights of a “modern” nation.

The attribute of the idea of “colonial modernity” is that it is an enslavement of the mind. This too is contestable or it disregards the belief that the human self is fundamentally free. Even in the worst of colonial times, this space was never totally lost. We refer to the legend of Zorba the Greek, made into a Hollywood classic in the 1970s, where Zorba cautions his boss that “When I am at work, I am yours, but when I am singing or playing, I am my own.” Zorba is a fictional character, but in real life too there have been people who said this in their own ways. The Apache chief Jeronemo’s courting death rather than give up the Apache’s way of life before he was snared and betrayed, says as much. There are certain spaces which even colonialism cannot conquer. The creative impulse in a man is always free, and this is why he is able to adopt to even the worst of circumstances, and given the free exercise of this creativity, can make the best out of them. This is also the law of nature. To take a very bad analogy, one which is putting the human race at a great disadvantage, the AIDS virus exhibits this creativity when it continually adopts and transforms its constitution to beat the best of human effort to eliminate it. “Colonial modernity” too, under whatever the circumstance they were born, can also make the modern man stronger. Liberal education that rests on a foundation of science and empiricism, is one such areas, to name just one. It is also noteworthy in this context that many former colonies which have shed their colonial complexes are poised to overtake their former colonizers playing by the very rules the latter introduced. India and China are two of these in the modern times.

Print

Latest News

MOREH| Nov 19
Former chief minister of Meghalaya and CWC member of All India Congress Committee (AICC), Dr. Mukul Sangma today visited Moreh and personally inspected the Integrated Check Post (ICP) located at the Indo-Myanmar border near the town.
H.....

CHURACHANDPUR | Nov 19
Vice-president of Zomi Revolutionary Organisation (ZRO), Calvin H and his cabinet colleague has expressed their desire to bring major changes in the organisation in a press conference held at his residence located at Dorcas Veng,.....

IMPHAL | Nov 19
Assam Rifles has condemned the alleged claims of secretary of Thadou Students’ Association (TSA), Michael Lamjathang Haokip, of being man handled by Assam Rifles troops, as published in various newspapers on November 17 and November 18......

KANGPOKPI | Nov 19
Social welfare and cooperation minister, Nemcha Kipgen released a gospel visual album at Kangpokpi District Headquarters.
The gospel visual album named ‘Vanchoi Ngai Um’ produced in loving memory of (L). Ng. Hatneibem alias Bebem .....

About Us

IFP Leichin and Imphal Free Press are autonomous associates sharing contents. IFP Leichin runs this web portal and Imphal Free Press is a respected English daily published from Imphal. Intellectual proprietorship of all articles published on this website, except those sourced from Imphal Free Press will be with IFP Leichin. Intellectual proprietorship of articles sourced from Imphal Free Press will be with Imphal Free Press.