It's not a good sign when our favorite "British" writers are a Jew and a half-Jew.

Some of the most informative books and articles I've ever read about Jews are written by Jews [Dr. Israel Shahak for one]. I don't see any reason not to read a book just because the author is a Jew, if anything it is valuable to know your enemy as such.

I'm getting stick from a nation that voted a war-mongering dim-wit into Presidency. Just compare that gibbering monkey's IQ to Tony Blair's.

A nation that thinks it can police the world, call the shots on who can have nukes and who can't, and regards human life a small price to pay for crude oil.

A nation who's children are as ignorant as they are obese.

A nation so eager to overthrow "British oppression" in 1776 (Britain should have won the war - revolutionaries = early terrorists) yet now so desperate to maintain European heritage because a few blacks are popping up here and there.

A nation so eager to get it's greasy mitts on Canada in 1812, except Britain wouldn't let it!

A nation who's troops in Iraq are ineducated, brainwashed, vulnerable murderers, while British troops are proffessional soldiers trying to bring calm to a country America has raped.

A nation which has all but decimated the glorious English language with bizarre mis-spellings and ridiculous slang. You'd be speaking French if it weren't for the British Empire.

And I hate to play the old slavery card, but Britian was exerting her awesome Navy power in stopping YOU LOT from continuing trade of negros with filthy Arabs throughout the 1800s.

A nation with gun-related deaths in the thousands - 99% of which could be prentable if guns were illegal.

A nation which could have prevented 9/11.

The SAS make Navy SEALS look like fags. British politics make American politics look like a hypocrisy. Prestigious and illustrious Brtish history makes America's 300 years of bloodshed look as barbaric as you believe negros are, you gun-totin' twerp.

Ah, the anti in me coming through. Don't mess with Britain, yanks...

First of all, I respect your passion, fellow White Nationalist. I do like that bit about "getting stick" -- Brits have a way with the Mother Tongue.

Second, I readily concede a few of your above points, especially the Bush part. White Nationalists everywhere need to realize this point --- We are all controlled, as are you, by Globalist Zionists who make the decisions and stir up the people to do their bidding. We Americans are, left alone by the ZOG, more isolationists than anything else. It took quite a bit of "Wagging the Dog" (good film, by-the-way) to get us into either World War or Korea or Vietnam or Iraq --9/11 being a ZOG operation in my opinion designed to get us into it over there.

Most of my ancestors are from the U.K.: Scot, Irish, Welsh, English blood, so don't think I'm denigrating you all, cousin. I'm an Anglophile, which is why I care about the assault on the British by ZOG, the Islamists, and even the self-genocide behavior of booze abuse that is raging there now. Granted, I'm an outsider, but I'm not the enemy.

Just don't abide ANYONE saying our beloved Bill of Rights' is somehow the cause of our woes. I'm sure you can understand that defense of nation passion.

Now then, if you re-read MY response to the one who made unkind/untrue remarks about our "gun-crazed" culture, I was making the point that ZOG -multiculti-P.C. is rampant not only in the USA but also in Britain and that making smarmy and untrue allegations about our Second Amendment Right being instead an uncivilized wrong was incorrect. "Gun-culture" is not the problem, that itself is a ZOG fiction.

Instead of ad hominem attacks, I would appreciate one of you fine Brits to address some of the points I originally made, such as: your magnificient Magna Carta being trashed; your rulers ALSO being ZOG-puppets; YOUR famously respected educational system being massively "dumbed-down" a la the USA; and your country being over-run by Islamists bent on taking over and making Dhimmis of you all. The age of British Empire is over and being now but a quaint slip of a powerful John Bull must be anger-inducing, but we American people are not to blame for that. Look to the Zionists and your own pansy-filled government, British Sheeple and MSM for the cause of your many woes.

Now, as far as whomever being a Jew or "half-Jew", news to me, but the points made are factual information, no matter whose mouth they are shouted from, so please address the facts. Everywhere the MSM is contolled by the Jews, that doesn't mean some truth doesn't emerge from their mouths. Also, just as your prophets Orwell and Huxley had their problems politically, their words and the truth behind them are what's at issue at this time.

That said, WE Americans fought the War between the States, i.e. Civil War and that decided the slavery issue. Would that all the Negros had been shipped back to Africa immediately thereafter.

No more Brother's Wars, here or on the field of battle, eh, coz?
Here now, let this Idaho-living, gun-loving, proud-of-her-White-Nationalist-husband, happy-to-be-a-"Mum" woman buy you a pint--

I'm getting stick from a nation that voted a war-mongering dim-wit into Presidency. Just compare that gibbering monkey's IQ to Tony Blair's.

In terms of IQ, the most intelligent president of the latter-half of the 20th century was Jimmy Carter. Some have suggested that he was also the worst president during that same period.

Quote:

A nation that thinks it can police the world, call the shots on who can have nukes and who can't, and regards human life a small price to pay for crude oil.

If you'd study history, you would know that America wasn't always like that. The change didn't occur until we started following Britain's lead in foreign policy. Britain dragged us into both WW1 and WW2. Heck, they were begging us to get into the war. So, you can't very well complain about it now. It's another case of "be careful what you wish for."

Quote:

A nation who's children are as ignorant as they are obese.

Well, that's just a cheap shot.

Quote:

A nation so eager to overthrow "British oppression" in 1776 (Britain should have won the war - revolutionaries = early terrorists) yet now so desperate to maintain European heritage because a few blacks are popping up here and there.

It was the oppression of the monarchy. We have always had an aversion to incompetent dictators. If you want a government like George III's again, then go for it.

Quote:

A nation so eager to get it's greasy mitts on Canada in 1812, except Britain wouldn't let it!

You obviously don't know much about the causes of the War of 1812. It wasn't over Canada. It was over the British navy acting like pirates, scuttling US merchant vessals, kidnapping the American sailors from those ships, and forcing them to serve in the British navy. The French did the same thing, too, and it nearly led to a war between the USA and France in 1807, but the French agreed to stop doing that. The British refused to agree to stop harrassing US merchant ships, and that's what triggered the war.

Britain was tied up in their aristocratic war against Napoleon, so they couldn't fight both America and France at the same time. The last time British and American troops fought each other was the Battle of New Orleans, which was one of the most lopsided battles in military history. As a result of being pummelled so badly, the British decided that they would never, ever want to face American troops in battle again. A mere 100 years later, they were begging for our help against the Germans, who had single-handedly fought the two leading Great Powers of Europe, France and Britain, to a stalemate.

Quote:

A nation who's troops in Iraq are ineducated, brainwashed, vulnerable murderers, while British troops are proffessional soldiers trying to bring calm to a country America has raped.

You're against WN, so that means you're in favor of the government responsible for invading Iraq. You really don't have any room to talk here, as long as you're an anti.

Quote:

A nation which has all but decimated the glorious English language with bizarre mis-spellings and ridiculous slang. You'd be speaking French if it weren't for the British Empire.

How so? George Washington saved the British Empire from the French, and part of what triggered the Revolution was the monarchy's cavalier ingratitude for what their subjects in America did for them.

Quote:

And I hate to play the old slavery card, but Britian was exerting her awesome Navy power in stopping YOU LOT from continuing trade of negros with filthy Arabs throughout the 1800s.

Yeah, well, it was because of the British monarchists and aristocrats that we had slavery to begin with. The importation of slaves was banned in America in 1808, and Britain was still in trading in slaves at that time.

Quote:

A nation with gun-related deaths in the thousands - 99% of which could be prentable if guns were illegal.

99% seems like a wild exaggeration. But again, as an anti, you really have no room to talk here, since the problem is not guns, it's people. It's also due to a government which does not adequately punish crime. But that would change drastically if a WN regime came to power. White Nationalists would be tough on crime, and the murder rate would drop to almost nothing.

Quote:

A nation which could have prevented 9/11.

Yes, but as an anti, you really don't have any room to talk here either. As far as I'm concerned, anyone and everyone who opposes White Nationalism is indirectly responsible for 9/11, so that's on you, my friend. As an opponent of WN, YOU caused 9/11. YOU are responsible for the deaths of over 3000 innocent people. Live with that on your conscience, if you have one.

Quote:

The SAS make Navy SEALS look like fags.

Would someone with a military expertise be able to confirm this? I really don't know about either organization, but I have a strong feeling that you don't know either.

Quote:

British politics make American politics look like a hypocrisy. Prestigious and illustrious Brtish history makes America's 300 years of bloodshed look as barbaric as you believe negros are, you gun-totin' twerp.

Well, at least, we're not afraid of guns.

As for American politics, again, that's the realm of those who oppose WN, meaning that it's on you, not us. You oppose WN, so therefore you support the "hypocritical" American politics.

Quote:

Ah, the anti in me coming through. Don't mess with Britain, yanks...

I have no intention of doing so. We should have left Britain to stew in its own juice in both WW1 and WW2. We should leave them alone now. We have our own problems to deal with here in America, some of which you've already noted, so we really don't have time to "mess with Britain." As far as I can tell, you Brits don't have time to mess with us Yanks, either. You don't exactly have utopia over there, so get off your high horse.

Yeah, well, it was because of the British monarchists and aristocrats that we had slavery to begin with. The importation of slaves was banned in America in 1808, and Britain was still in trading in slaves at that time.

WRONG! Britain passed the Slave Trade Act, freeing all slaves in the British Empire in 1807.

George III is one of my favourite kings in British history (the others being Edward I and Richard the Lionheart). He was the first Hanoverian king to actually take an interest in Britain rather than Germany and rule with a passion. He was tremendously popular over here, even if America did hate him. He made great gains for Britian in the Seven Years War, and stood up to Napoleon when all of Europe wavered.

You're against WN, so that means you're in favor of the government responsible for invading Iraq. You really don't have any room to talk here, as long as you're an anti.

This statement doesn't make sense. If anything, tree-hugging anti-racists are more likely to oppose the Iraq war than WNs, and don't necessarily like the government. I'm English and a WN now, so why can I not oppose the American government? I bloody do, I'll tell you what. I am divided on the Iraq war. While I disagree with the American occupattion and atrocities they commit, the insurgents deserve nothing but death and retribution. It's a dilemma.

99% seems like a wild exaggeration. But again, as an anti, you really have no room to talk here, since the problem is not guns, it's people. It's also due to a government which does not adequately punish crime. But that would change drastically if a WN regime came to power. White Nationalists would be tough on crime, and the murder rate would drop to almost nothing.

Gun crime is as common in white suburbs as black ones. Remember the Columbine incident? That alone would be enough to outlaw gun ownership in the UK, it's common sense. You Americans are just crazy.

Yes, but as an anti, you really don't have any room to talk here either. As far as I'm concerned, anyone and everyone who opposes White Nationalism is indirectly responsible for 9/11, so that's on you, my friend. As an opponent of WN, YOU caused 9/11. YOU are responsible for the deaths of over 3000 innocent people. Live with that on your conscience, if you have one.

That one hurt, and I expect an apology. How dare you lay the burden of 9/11 on me. I'm a WN, and one who detests any form of Fundamentalist Islam. My heart goes out to those 3000 who were murdered on that crazy day. If you read my earlier posts on 9/11 you'll realise that America has been foolish. The hijackers were Saudi Arabian, and were funded by the Saudi Arabian government. Yet because the Bush family have ties with the Saudis (who own huge stock in American economy), America strikes at... Iraq! A country which has never attacked the U.S. Now American soldiers and innocent Iraqis alike are dying today, because America's leaders are insane, and the citizens so ignorant that they will follow them like sheep and not ask questions. Talk your way out of that one.

9/11 being a ZOG operation in my opinion designed to get us into it over there.

9/11 was commited by Saudi Arabian hijackers, sent by Al-Qaeda in response to Western presence in the Middle East. The group was funded by the Saudi government, America's "pals". Explain to me the part where ZOG, Iraq or any Jews come into this, and I'll give you a gold star.

OAKLAND — A Fresno, Calif., high school teacher has been charged with a hate crime more than a year after she allegedly pushed a Jewish woman to the ground, pulled her hair, kicked her and told her, "You should have burned in the oven with the rest of the Jews."

I sure don't like Jews but that was pretty cold and totally uncalled for. That was pretty mean and low class. We should handle ourselves in ways that command respect and not compromise our values to get even with a Jew who maybe wronged us. But then again I do not know the whole story or if it is even true or not. It's not good that a child can talk like that because she obviously got it from her parents and it didn't seem to be justified for the Jew wearing a star of david on her shirt.

9/11 was commited by Saudi Arabian hijackers, sent by Al-Qaeda in response to Western presence in the Middle East. The group was funded by the Saudi government, America's "pals". Explain to me the part where ZOG, Iraq or any Jews come into this, and I'll give you a gold star.

This thread I posted --- on a White teacher being charged with a most dubious 'hate crime' long after the fact because she and her husband are White Nationalists who had a party for same on their own property, and were jailed for doing such thing while also having guns within range of the husband who is an ex-felon --- was first on News, changed to Opposing for just this sort of reason, I guess.

Odd. First folks believe every word from the Zionist controlled anti-White Nationalist police and media about this woman and then, when they can't refute facts coming from a MSM book source condemn it out-of-hand as being from a Jew MSM source.
Strange logic, that.
And all this is far from the topic at hand, but that's part of you folks' role as professional contrarians, I suppose.

Ah, and no example of a reasoned, civilized response from a member of the once glorious U.K. to my last post?

Most disappointing.

Right, I'll, as you say, explain the part where ZOG comes into this latest war to end all wars.
Bush and his neo-cons answer to the world-wide Zionist overlords who want absolute global control of their domestic populations as well as the safety of Israel and plentiful oil money.
Muslims and their Islamic faith and Western Civilization have never and will never happily co-exist and they are guilty of many crimes against us.
Yet they are not the large power, they are used as are the rest of us, by the powers that be, the global zionists.
Whoever carried out the attack, which was not as reported by MSM, of course, is immaterial in a very real sense, as the globalists remain untouched and fully in control.
If anyone wants to actually learn more about the power of ZOG and what it's behind and why, there are many sources, especially here at SF or on Google.
When folks who should know better seem willfully dense, I become suspicious and a bit bored.

Perhaps stay on topic in future and start your own thread if you wish to argue pointlessly. Or talk to the mirror to see both your friend and foe.