Yeah, Sutton has been coaching too long to be a fraud. He's got head coaching experience (At Army, lulz) and been in the game for the better part of 2 decades. He's no Daballess. He's closer to Gunther Cunningham.

I was expecting more established coordinators, but as others have said, I will reserve judgement until we see them on the field. Sutton looks like a proper, nice guy...hopefully he coaches with some fire as I prefer seeing that in a defensive coordinator.

I really like the defensive lineup of coaches. I like Brasher, and wanted to keep Gibbs and Thomas. Special teams coach is a coup in my eyes. I'm pretty happy. We'll just have to play wait and see with Sutton. He goes 1 gap and brings an attacking defense, I think we can do very well.

I was expecting more established coordinators, but as others have said, I will reserve judgement until we see them on the field. Sutton looks like a proper, nice guy...hopefully he coaches with some fire as I prefer seeing that in a defensive coordinator.

Being an old army guy he's going to bring some ****ing discipline to the defense, and they desperately need it. As long as he can scheme, we should be in real good shape. That's the real unknown here.

David Culley has served as the Eagles wide receivers coach since 1999, Andy Reid's first season as head coach, and has been a valuable contributor to the Eagles' offensive success. He was promoted to senior offensive assistant/wide receivers coach in 2011. In this role, Culley will continue to play a vital role in assisting offensive coordinator Marty Mornhinweg and the remainder of the offensive staff in formulating all aspects of the offensive game plan on a weekly basis.

1. It creates some major needs on defense. The last time we switched schemes we used the #3 pick on Tyson Jackson... Would have to see a defense "need" prevent us from taking a QB.

2. When you look at all the DC names we heard of most of them run the cover 2. I think that's an outdated defense, especially against running qbs. While I'd love to have Lovie Smith, I don't want to see the cover two back in KC.

1. It creates some major needs on defense. The last time we switched schemes we used the #3 pick on Tyson Jackson... Would have to see a defense "need" prevent us from taking a QB.

2. When you look at all the DC names we heard of most of them run the cover 2. I think that's an outdated defense, especially against running qbs. While I'd love to have Lovie Smith, I don't want to see the cover two back in KC.

Tyson is going to have to rework his deal. Yeah, he improved last year, but that ****er isn't getting 17 millio of Hunt dollars for his body of work to date. It's still a huge question mark if he'll be back.