Note: This is a beta release of Red Hat Bugzilla 5.0. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Also email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback here.

This site requires JavaScript to be enabled to function correctly, please enable it.

Description of problem:
Icons for launcing OOo are really ugly. They doesn't fit, as they are way larger
than any of the others on the panel (globe-with-mice firefox icon and letter
evoulution icon), and completely sqare. It simply looks bad with three bricks
sitting on top of my panel.
On top of that, (at least) the impress and the calc icon are very difficult to
understand - how should i know that red icon (with, if i look *really* close,
has a rounded sqare in the middle) means "impress"? Same with calc - similarity
in colour with MS office isn't enough. (as a matter of fact, i liked the artwork
of ooo 1.1.x better than the to much "oh please, i want to look like MS Office
2003!" feeling i get by looking at ooo 1.9.x.)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
redhat-artwork-0.122-4
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Rest of the new theme look really nice :)

Concerning the size of the icons, I totally agree with you. They are too large.
I don't really have an oppinion about the style of the icons and I think the
colours are ok. I have, in fact, never used MsOffice and I don't know how these
icons look like, but yes, without any text it is hard to understand which icon
launches which part of the suite.

Simon, the icons should not have text on them but should illustrate the purpose
of the application - look at the ones used in FC3 (to which I think we should
revert). And the colors are *not* OK, they break consistency with the rest of
the icons from the panel/menu.

Sorry for no being clear enough concerning the text. I just wanted to say that I
need the mouse-over text to find out which icon is which, because they are not
clear. I DID not mean that there should be text added to the icons!!

Adding text is probably not the correct answer - that is done allready.
Why not use the icons used in FC<3? They are not as fancy, but they are clear
and consistent with the rest of the desktop. And i'll pick "clear and
consistent" over "fancy" any day. Where did those icons come from anyway?
And then there is those with poor eyesigth - what do they see? probably just a
colored "blob". Because they are just that. A colored blob - no good, clear, and
recognizable shape.

The point of an icon is to provide a visual shortcut that describes what will
happen. An orange wavey piece of paper with a seagull, and a feinter orange
square doesn't say "presentation program", at least to me.
The previous icons were better.