Comments on: SOFIC 18 – Franklin Armory BFSIII TR-4 Triggerhttp://soldiersystems.net/2018/05/25/sofic-18-franklin-armory-bfsiii-tr-4-trigger/
An Industry Daily and Tactical Gear News BlogSun, 15 Sep 2019 06:38:15 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.3.20By: Joehttp://soldiersystems.net/2018/05/25/sofic-18-franklin-armory-bfsiii-tr-4-trigger/comment-page-1/#comment-1062408
Fri, 25 May 2018 20:55:20 +0000http://soldiersystems.net/?p=156325#comment-1062408But can I get it installed in my Reformation Firearm?
]]>By: C Joneshttp://soldiersystems.net/2018/05/25/sofic-18-franklin-armory-bfsiii-tr-4-trigger/comment-page-1/#comment-1062384
Fri, 25 May 2018 17:12:44 +0000http://soldiersystems.net/?p=156325#comment-1062384I can certainly see a binary option becoming more popular with law enforcement outside of its status of a gimmick to avoid the NFA. It can be used for a suppressive fire effect where the shooter has direct control over his cyclic rate, kinda like the old BAR with its selectable rates of fire. It does seem a bit of a stretch though.
]]>By: jellydonuthttp://soldiersystems.net/2018/05/25/sofic-18-franklin-armory-bfsiii-tr-4-trigger/comment-page-1/#comment-1062375
Fri, 25 May 2018 16:31:50 +0000http://soldiersystems.net/?p=156325#comment-1062375Considering it is already a full auto trigger, why on earth would gov. buyers want the NFA-circumventing ‘binary’ trigger pull over a real, honest-to-God two-round burst in the fourth position?

It’s a gimmick for civilians, I don’t see why gov. buyers would go for this when they could have the real deal.