Of course this assumes the Olympic points are included. You'd think they would be, but I guess we can't know for sure. Even without then, Murray would have 10,237 to Federer's 10,060 - so I guess it doesn't matter.

IF this formula is correct and I've calculated it correctly (and not missed any grass court points, or used the wrong amount of points) then Murray will be 2nd seed at Wimbledon.

Whether that is good or bad though, who knows. It means he will avoid Djokovic but could face Nadal or Ferrer instead.

What justification could Wimbledon give for not giving Andy the second seed spot at Wimbledon? He got to the Wimbles final and won the Olympics last year. Okay, Queen's last year was, frankly, a bit of a bummer, but he did the biz in the tourneys that mattered. As far as I'm concerned no one won Queen's last year anyway, so it doesn't count lol.

I think the seedings at Wimbles will be interesting this year. Would Djokovic get top seed? Federer getting it, looking at how he has been lately, seems bonkers. If Nadal gets into the top three seeds I might have to kill someone .

To my mind it would be ideal if Djokovic did get top seed, with Andy at 2. Federer could have 3, I'm being kind to him, and Nadal at 4. Then what needs to happen is that Nadal goes on Djokovic's side of the draw, and Federer on Andy's. Djokovic would be allowed to beat Nadal on grass - if Nadal plays anything like he has at RG I reckon Djokovic might just manage that. I think Andy would beat Federer. Then Andy meets Djokovic in the final, and job done, Andy wins. Simples!

What justification could Wimbledon give for not giving Andy the second seed spot at Wimbledon? He got to the Wimbles final and won the Olympics last year. Okay, Queen's last year was, frankly, a bit of a bummer, but he did the biz in the tourneys that mattered. As far as I'm concerned no one won Queen's last year anyway, so it doesn't count lol.

I think the seedings at Wimbles will be interesting this year. Would Djokovic get top seed? Federer getting it, looking at how he has been lately, seems bonkers. If Nadal gets into the top three seeds I might have to kill someone .

To my mind it would be ideal if Djokovic did get top seed, with Andy at 2. Federer could have 3, I'm being kind to him, and Nadal at 4. Then what needs to happen is that Nadal goes on Djokovic's side of the draw, and Federer on Andy's. Djokovic would be allowed to beat Nadal on grass - if Nadal plays anything like he has at RG I reckon Djokovic might just manage that. I think Andy would beat Federer. Then Andy meets Djokovic in the final, and job done, Andy wins. Simples!

Assuming the article Elena linked to is right (and there's no reason to assume otherwise) there's a specific formula in the post above that would mean Djokovic is comfortably top seed, Murray 2nd and Federer 3rd.

Nadal could well be 5th seed if Ferrer makes the final. If the latter does beat Tsonga, I may well try and work out the seeding between them two. Ferrer would have the rank and won more grass points in 2012, but Nadal has the 2011 Wimby final.

What justification could Wimbledon give for not giving Andy the second seed spot at Wimbledon? He got to the Wimbles final and won the Olympics last year. Okay, Queen's last year was, frankly, a bit of a bummer, but he did the biz in the tourneys that mattered. As far as I'm concerned no one won Queen's last year anyway, so it doesn't count lol.

I think the seedings at Wimbles will be interesting this year. Would Djokovic get top seed? Federer getting it, looking at how he has been lately, seems bonkers. If Nadal gets into the top three seeds I might have to kill someone .

To my mind it would be ideal if Djokovic did get top seed, with Andy at 2. Federer could have 3, I'm being kind to him, and Nadal at 4. Then what needs to happen is that Nadal goes on Djokovic's side of the draw, and Federer on Andy's. Djokovic would be allowed to beat Nadal on grass - if Nadal plays anything like he has at RG I reckon Djokovic might just manage that. I think Andy would beat Federer. Then Andy meets Djokovic in the final, and job done, Andy wins. Simples!

Roger will lose in the quarters of Halle and Wimbledon now. It's the beginning of the end, you feel.

Well I won't be shedding any tears. All things have their time and Federer's time appears to be over.

I think the writing has been on the wall since Andy pasted him in the Olympics. It seems obvious to me. Federer won his last two majors against Andy in the final. Andy is now much better. Federer is highly unlikely to play an untried, untested player in a final of a major now. I really do think Federer is done.