Black Panther's commercial success has spawned countless social media posts, stories, viral moments, reactions and dialogues that run the gamut from "yaaaassss" to "yo, it's just a movie."

For me, it's hard to find anything in the Marvel Universe to top Thor: Rangarok in terms of sheer entertainment value, but it's also hard to deny the cultural significance of an entire cast of black actors crushing it in fictional Wakanda on the big screen in such a massive production as Black Panther.

Like all works of art, the quality of a film is open to interpretation. The majority of Black Panther's reviews are positive, but there are some outliers. Which isn't surprising, I mean there are some people who claim to have liked Justice League, even though it is objectively awful, so that's to be expected.

However when Astead Wesley of the Boston Globe took a look at critic Kyle Smith's review of Marvel's foray into Wakanda, he noticed a recurring trend with some of Smith's reviews.

That movies featuring black actors don't seem to be Smith's cup of tea.

The Birth of a Nation film was an incredible injustice to black and American history. Turner’s identity was completely reinvented and the slave rebellion wasn’t appropriately highlighted. That movie was a sham riddled with historical inaccuracies.

Well, he writes for the national review. Conservative media's job is to stoke anger and fear within their readership, to keep them afraid, keep them buying guns, keep them being racist, etc. He's just doing his deplorable job