Comalcalco's Mysterious Mason Marks

I first came across this incredibly interesting discovery while reading about the Comalcalco stone associated with the second known reference
supposedly to 2012 that has been announced by the National Institute of Anthropology and History recently,you can find that thread
hereMexico Acknowledges 2nd Mayan Reference to 2012 if interested.

So while researching the Comalcalco stone I stumbled upon something that surprised and caught my attention immediately,that was the archeological
finding of thousands of bricks that were engraved with inscriptions & languages that were not native to Meso-America at the time and do not belong
there as history & other archeological findings in the region would have us believe!

So started my research to dig deeper and what follows is what I've been able to gather & decipher so far ,I will start from the beginning,so as to
give some background information on the discovery-

Comalcalco Temple one

Top of Temple one

Comalcalco is a Mayan site surrounded by a rain forest in the Mexican state of Tabasco,It is the only Meso-American city constructed of fired
bricks. (I will get to exactly what "fired bricks" are and where the process originated a little later) These ruins contain 372 mounds covering
40 sq. kilometers;so far only four of the 372 mounds have been completely excavated and they have revealed an acropolis,seven temples,two palaces,two
structures and 20-30 tombs.

Found within these mounds were thousands of fired bricks that held inscriptions depicting animals,people,plants,houses,temples,ships,letters and
sacred symbols but surprisingly many had Mediterranean elements with two even showing elephants!

In the early 1960's a preliminary site survey it was revealed two bricks with inscriptions on them.Afterwards between the years 1975-1978 Mexican
archeologist Pancio Salazar,at the time working for the national institute of anthropology & history of Mexico (I.N.A.H) continued more excavations
discovering forty six hundred inscribed bricks that were later examined.

Most of the inscriptions were recognizable as Mayan hieroglyphs.but a few turned out to be completely different,causing excitement and speculation.It
was not until 1980 after Salazars death that the collection of bricks were photographed & cataloged by archeologist & epigrapher Neil Steede.
Steede showed the photos to professor Barry Fell then leader & founder of 'the epigraphic society'.

Fell went onto publish a series of papers on the subject of the bricks for ESOP (The epigraphic society occasional papers) 'the Comalcalco
bricks:part 1,the Roman phase' (published in Vol. 19)
Fell drew attention to what he called "Mason's Marks"out of the forty six hundred bricks examined,fifteen hundred were marked in this way.

What was so interesting about these marks was their striking similarity to Roman mason's marks found on similar bricks in Britain among other
places.The Romans used these marks to keep a tally of individual productivity and slaves.

Each of their quarry slaves were required to produce close to two hundred bricks a day,by marking the bricks each slave made with his personal
symbol,the slave could prove he was working at full speed.
Also it is believed that The Roman bricks are often stamped with the mark of the legion that supervised their production.

The Romans made use of fired bricks, and the Roman legions, which operated mobile kilns[citation needed], introduced bricks to many parts of the
empire. Roman bricks are often stamped with the mark of the legion that supervised their production. The use of bricks in southern and western
Germany, for example, can be traced back to traditions already described by the Roman architect Vitruvius.

The diagram compares some of the marks found at Comalcalco (on the right) with those found at Roman sites (on the left). The similarities are truly
amazing!
Additional links concerning 'Mason marks'- Link

Some researchers have also claimed that the dimensions of the bricks (more like flat tiles than conventional bricks) and some of the
architectural details are more Roman than Mayan. Any Roman connection to the Americas would pre-date Columbus by a thousand years.

Proponents of early contacts from across the Atlantic claim that the Indian Satavahana Dynasty, dating from about 200 BC to 200 AD, had developed
extensive trade connections with Rome, and that Brahmi script soon reached Comalcalco.

The technology to make kiln-fired bricks appears to be similar in parts of South East Asia and Comalcalco. As further support, they cite the urn
burials found at Comalcalco, which they claim were virtually contemporary with similar burials in India.

Archaeologists working to restore the site discovered that many of the bricks had inscriptions on them. These inscriptions had been invisible,
hidden from view, while the bricks had been set in mortar. Dislodged bricks, and those removed for resetting as part of the restoration process, often
bore mysterious symbols or inscriptions. In some cases, the brick makers' fingerprints were still clearly visible.

Neil Steede, an archaeologist working on the site, studied almost 5,000 bricks, and photographed the inscriptions he found on about 1,500 of them.
Most of the symbols or inscriptions have been interpreted as masons' signs. The really curious thing is that these marks turn out to be virtually
identical to the masons' marks used by the Romans, half a world away.

Steede was led to the astonishing conclusion that, "The illustrated bricks of Comalcalco are pieces to a grand puzzle, whose completed, final image
may reveal a Roman Christian presence in the Americas a thousand years before the arrival of Columbus." 1

David Eccott has argued that the technology and perhaps the expertise behind the brick-making at Comalcalco could be part of a tradition
stretching back thousands of years. He believes that some of the signs represent a form of ancient script familiar to Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley
culture of northern India around 3000 BC.

It is thought to have gradually spread eastwards to China, Sumatra, Easter Island (rongorongo script), and finally Peru, Panama, and Mexico. Examples
of the Indus Valley script have been identified both at Comalcalco and on the adobe bricks used to construct the pyramids at Las Ventanas in northwest
Peru, dated to between 300 BC and 880 AD. The Indian Satavahana dynasty (c. 200 BC - 200 AD) is known to have had extensive trade connections with
Rome.

Clyde Winters and Neil Steede explored the iconography of the symbols carved in Comalcalco bricks in some detail. Winters, an expert on Olmec
script, which pre-dates the rise of the Maya, quickly recognized that one particular brick (T1 452 R16) was very special, since it had both Olmec and
Maya script side by side.

Winters translated the Olmec script, and Steede worked on the Maya script, independently, before comparing notes. Their work showed that the two
scripts told the same tale. The left hand side was essentially a translation of the right hand side; the brick was bilingual!

It is believed that the creators of these unique bricks inscribed onto the surface while still wet, then they were used for construction.Archeologist
Neil Steede reported "The inscriptions were never intended to be seen and were covered with mortar" the builders did not wet the brick before applying
mortar.This allowed the mortar to bond with the brick and pull away readily"

Why were the bricks made in such a way as to not be seen? it has been theorized that possibly the creatoes wanted to preserve their
inscriptions,perhaps realizing that one day the bricks would be unearthed providing a time capsule of sorts.

I suppose this is possible,nothing can be ruled out completely,I find that fascinating none the less,if true.

We can see that Comalcalco is one of the most compelling examples of archeology discoveries that point towards pre-columbian conrtact in history.

Theorists say elsewhere in the Maya region, Roman-style figurines have emerged, and pre-Columbian horse remains have been excavated. Old World
parasites and DNA affinities, the blowgun, bark cloth, and paper manufacturing said to have been unearthed at or near Comalcalco add to the mystery
according to supporters of the theory.

Of course, mainstream researchers are not quick to embrace the speculation, citing inconclusive and lack of documented evidence. But most will agree
that the ruins at Comalcalco are indeed some of the most mystifying pieces of the Mayan puzzle that have been discovered. While much of the
architecture is believed akin to structures at nearby Palenque, the art of brick making and many of the design features evident at Comalcalco are
singular in the Maya world.

additional interest is the discovery on what is etched or carved into the reverse sides of these bricks, which for all practical purposes are thinner
than brick and resemble more of a tile. Made of mortar from crushed shell and rock, the oven baked tiles were often ornamented with drawings, symbols,
or even ancient script. In both India and Rome masons would often place their symbol on the back side of tiles, adding support to the argument for
Comalcalco's possible connection to oceanic traders.

Originally posted by scoobdude
Interesting so far. Any pictures of the symbols on the actual bricks?

Originally posted by Dr Cosma
Yep very interesting indeed

I would also like to see pics of the inscriptions on the fired bricks themselves, if that's possible.
Nice thread mate.

Unfortunately I have been looking and looking...I cannot find anything yet.
a lot of the text from what I have been able to gather is not even available unless you buy the books etc.

I will continue to look! I am eager myself to see,from what I know,Steede who originally photographed them was on record saying a lot of the photos
were not of the best quality etc. I believe I saw that somewhere.

here are a few engraved stones,not the ones with the symbols/language on them,from what I could find so far.

I wanted to add the following,I was unable to add it to the original op because of space-

brick has been used as a building material for at least 5,000 years. The first brick was probably made in the Middle East, between the Tigris and
Euphrates rivers in what is now Iraq. Lacking the stone their contemporaries in other regions used for permanent structures, early builders here
relied on the abundant natural materials to make their sun-baked bricks.

These, however, were of limited use because they lacked durability and could not be used outdoors; exposure to the elements caused them to
disintegrate. The Babylonians, who later dominated Mesopotamia, were the first to fire bricks, from which many of their tower-temples were
constructed.
From the Middle East the art of brickmaking spread west to what is now Egypt and east to Persia and India. Although the Greeks, having a plentiful
supply of stone, did not use much brick, evidence of brick kilns and structures remains throughout the Roman Empire. Read more:
www.answers.com...

COMALCALCO...........
Comal- Communicate
Calco- Calculate
Amazing how the closer we get to our own self destruction, the more our eyes are opened to what's going to happen.
I think we'll have less than 30 days between the moment of clarity and the perpetual darkness, right after they uncover the link between Egyptians
and Mayans.

Yup well... the word comal can mean a few things. I dont argue the translation, just noting that the use has possibilities. which brings to mind two
things for me because I dont know if the origin is Spanish or "native." Could just be mestizo but even that would mean nothing more than a mix of
native/spanish, I'm not sure.

A comal is used with heat to make a type of bread, similar to naan, called the tortilla.

very old practice considering the people and what they
grew/ate. Think corn or wheat. Maybe a sort of hotplate.
BUT... it could also refer to a furnace of sorts, a furnace itself which would be needed in order to make bricks.
Using the example: Go to the comal or go put this on the comal. When you say that, one walks over to the stove because its where the comal would
be.

Now you say communicate, I was speculating in a similar thread, that these bricks were used to communicate various things. I didnt really get into the
religion, but one can easily see something of that too. Considering comalcalco was suggested to be a port.. I could imagine there being a place to
fire bricks. The Aztecs built their city (the present day Mexico City area) out of mud because there was no quarry. They heated mud into bricks. Makes
me wonder if they have found very large molcahetes and the brick molds too.

Yup well... the word comal can mean a few things. I dont argue the translation, just noting that the use has possibilities. which brings to mind two
things for me because I dont know if the origin is Spanish or "native." Could just be mestizo but even that would mean nothing more than a mix of
native/spanish, I'm not sure.

A comal is used with heat to make a type of bread, similar to naan, called the tortilla.

very old practice considering the people and what they
grew/ate. Think corn or wheat. Maybe a sort of hotplate.
BUT... it could also refer to a furnace of sorts, a furnace itself which would be needed in order to make bricks.
Using the example: Go to the comal or go put this on the comal. When you say that, one walks over to the stove because its where the comal would
be.

Now you say communicate, I was speculating in a similar thread, that these bricks were used to communicate various things. I didnt really get into the
religion, but one can easily see something of that too. Considering comalcalco was suggested to be a port.. I could imagine there being a place to
fire bricks. The Aztecs built their city (the present day Mexico City area) out of mud because there was no quarry. They heated mud into bricks. Makes
me wonder if they have found very large molcahetes and the brick molds too.

Thanks for the thread Op by the way.

You make some interesting points,thanks for your contribution in my other thread as well,The literal English translation of "Comalcalco" is "In the
house of the comals". A comal is a pan used to prepare tortillas,so you were pretty spot on.

Originally posted by Druid42
I love the A&LC threads, when they are well presented, and yours surely is. I also have found many unexplained instances of pre-visitation, so thank
you for providing more information. SnF.

Thank you for the kind words.

Originally posted by kdog1982
I think maybe the translation of Comalcalco is the house of pans.

The literal English translation of "Comalcalco" is "In the house of the comals". A comal is a pan used to prepare tortillas.

Mark making is probably one of the first things as humans we learn to do before we understand langauge, and it is entirely possible that two
civilisations seperate by a vast ocean and conntinents , that they would create similar looking marks , which have completely different meanings!

For example the mayans use the symbol of the cross and the steps , and the swirl motif to represent the steps to xibalba and to the underworld . and
the steps to the crossing between this world and the afterlife , the cross being the galactic cross and the center of the milky way !

Where as the romans , may have used the cross to represent early christianity !

This seemed interesting at first, but that Neil Steede guy does not seem like a particularly reputable source. If he has 1500 photos of anomalous
Mason's marks in Comalcalco, he should really have published them online. I can't find any by him, nor any convincing photos by anyone else. All the
references to the glyphs on these bricks seem to go back to him.

Here is a site by Neil Steede where he claims carvings at Palenque contain elaborate depictions of Jesus Christ (and also a picture of him standing by
a large chicken). www.greatlakesrestorationbranches.org...

However, I found another site that has a few photos of some crosses and jagged lines from Comalcalco which are somewhat similar to the Mason's marks
he depicted. www.pbase.com... There could always be more.

A problem with interpreting Mason's marks is that it is not easy to tell if they were carved to communicate something important or not. These symbols
are pretty basic and could quite easily have no more purpose than identification or accounting of a labourer's work.
On the other hand, maybe their simplicity offers power as type of fundamental universal communication? Triangles, circles, intersections etc all
refer in some way to the underlying math of the universe.

This is a bit off topic, but I thought I'd add it as I can't be bothered to write a thread about it and this Comalcalco one is not looking in good
shape.
London, England's streets are not paved with gold, but the curb stones are certainly highly decorated in Mason's marks. afaik these stones are a
couple of hundred years old in many places.

Originally posted by sapien82
Mark making is probably one of the first things as humans we learn to do before we understand langauge, and it is entirely possible that two
civilisations seperate by a vast ocean and conntinents , that they would create similar looking marks , which have completely different meanings!

For example the mayans use the symbol of the cross and the steps , and the swirl motif to represent the steps to xibalba and to the underworld . and
the steps to the crossing between this world and the afterlife , the cross being the galactic cross and the center of the milky way !

Where as the romans , may have used the cross to represent early christianity !

Actually, the cross has been a mystical symbol in Egypt long before Christianity...

I'm afraid I never post anything sufficiently interesting enough to garner much response, but as good or as bad as this subject may be (fellow above
with pictures of London Makers marks), it has piqued my curiosity greatly. My wife has decided we are going to vacation there and do some looking and
investigating.

One of the mysteries of ancient marks is obviously the meanings. I'm thinking (and this isn't a put down) that maybe the folks who think this is
all Atlantis or Lemuria, ought to give it a chance to be legitimized first. If it's not legitimate, then try to go back to whatever Mu, Atlantis,
etc, may have been.

The reason I say the above is that too often things that are found are attributed to a long lost, never to be found civilization, or to aliens from
planet X. Seems like we are never ready to give the human civilizations or race, it's due. There is always the possibility (be it however slim)
that we could have done it ourselves.

And for what it is worth, I wouldn't be at all surprised, if we ever get to the bottom and find all the answers, that there was the possibility of
global societies that interacted much like today, at some point in the past. Although, it seems a little strange that there isn't more "written or
pictorial" topical evidence of it.

A Star and Flag to the OP and some of the following posts. Thank you so much for this information and the time you took to create clear and concise
posts, all.

I have looked,and looked myself for the pictures of the engravings...that does not mean this thread is obsolete or as you stated " in bad shape" I
will be waiting for you to compile a thread and do better.

At the end of the day,Comalcalco being the only Olmec/Mayan or central American site to be found using fired bricks is fascinating alone.
did you see the Mediterranean looking ceramic heads? what about them?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.