If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

... which has a very different button stance (higher, wider spaced) and more minimalist details (the jcrew model has stitching around all the edges and a back seam), so I wouldn't call it "basically the same design" aside from the fact they're both cardigans with blazer-like lapels, or if you just meant they both have ridiculously short chopped tails.

I have this exact sweater blazer. When I bought it I really wanted to hate it but not gonna lie its got some decent weight to it and makes a great piece for wearing around our Chicago office. In regards to the chest pocket, I don't think anyone is going to notice nor care about its placement. After all its a sweater blazer and I don't think anyone will look at it as a formal piece.

I have this exact sweater blazer. When I bought it I really wanted to hate it but not gonna lie its got some decent weight to it and makes a great piece for wearing around our Chicago office. In regards to the chest pocket, I don't think anyone is going to notice nor care about its placement. After all its a sweater blazer and I don't think anyone will look at it as a formal piece.

Well, you're 100% wrong about nobody noticing/caring about the pocket placement. The whole reason for this particular thread was because somebody noticed and cared (several somebodies).

The pocket placement isn't a formality issue, but a proportions/location issue. It really, really should be placed higher. But if you don't mind, more power to you, as the rest of that sweater blazer looks awesome.