Japan Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plant blog
Tracking Fukushima news from day 1 : | Now one of the world's largest Public Available Repositories of the Chronology of the Daiichi Nuclear ongoing Disaster.
This entire site and content is 100% copyright (for commercial replication), please use the form to submit application for re-use. This site is 100% Educational and all licences in relation to reporting are attended to.

Thursday, 31 January 2013

With
two decades to go before it can reprocess spent nuclear fuel, the US
will have to bury nearly 70,000 tons of it, a research lab reports. It
comes after Congress and the Obama administration defunded a planned
nuclear waste repository in 2011.
[link to www.occuworld.org]

The
dirty little secret of "safe" nuclear power. Not one plant should be
allowed to refuel until they have a long term plan for spent fuel.

Southern OR (GLP)
<end snip>

Just another day it seems for 'no-where-to-put-it', as sourced by the Author....

According to Ministry of Education, as of now, the radiation level in the parking lot at the trail head is 0.528 microsievert/hour at 1 meter from the ground, a drop from about 0.7 microsievert/hour after decontamination done on what looks like January 13 and 14, 2013. However, the level has been creeping up again since.

According to CTBT, Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty’s radiation monitoring post in Takasaki Gunma, the amount of cesium-134/137 in the atmosphere have almost not been changed since September of 2011.

Last December, 64 μBq/m3 of Cs-134 and 107 μBq/m3 of Cs-137 were measured at average.

Fukushima Radiation Plume Hit Southern and Central California

The Journal Environmental Science and Technology reports in a new study that the Fukushima radiation plume contacted North America at California “with greatest exposure in central and southern California”, and that Southern California’s seaweed tested over 500% higher for radioactive iodine-131 than anywhere else in the U.S. and Canada:

Projected paths of the radioactive atmospheric plume emanating from the Fukushima reactors, best described as airborne particles or aerosols for 131I, 137Cs, and 35S, and subsequent atmospheric monitoring showed it coming in contact with the North American continent at California, with greatest exposure in central and southern California. Government monitoring sites in Anaheim (southern California) recorded peak airborne concentrations of 131I at 1.9 pCi m−3

Simon Fraser University in Canada also tested North American seaweed after Fukushima:

“In samples of dehydrated seaweed taken on March 15 near the North Vancouver SeaBus terminal, the count was zero; on March 22 it was 310 Bq per kilogram; and by March 28 it was380 Bq/kg.” -Vancouver Sun

Seaweed in Seattle also tested positive for iodine-131; levels were not reported -KIRO

Instead of doing much to try to protect their citizens from Fukushima, Japan, the U.S. and the EUall just raised the radiation levels they deem “safe”.Nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen says that high-level friends in the State Department told him that Hillary Clinton signed a pact with her counterpart in Japan agreeing that the U.S. will continuebuying seafood from Japan, despite that food not being tested for radioactive materials [see this].And the Department of Energy is trying to replace the scientifically accepted model of the dangers of low dose radiation based on voodoo science. Specifically, DOE’s Lawrence Berkeley Labs used a mutant line of human cells in a petri dish which was able to repair damage from low doses of radiation, and extrapolated to the unsupported conclusion that everyone is immune to low doses of radiation….

On 1/30/2013, the Fukushima accident council was held to evaluate the progress of Tepco’s decommissioning.
Mr. Kurokawa, the chairman of the governmental accident investigation committee commented the SFP of reactor4 is the crisis in front of us. The entire world is concerned about that.
[b]
Mr. Kitazawa, the chairman of the council stated it takes a while to remove all the spent fuel from the pool. There is no appropriate solution for that.[/b]

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

NUCLEAR GENOCIDE

Since 1986 when one 185 ton nuclear fuel reactor exploded there has been millions of people die all from the nuclear contamination this one reactor unleashed. They called this nuclear disaster Chernobyl

Death toll estimate from Chernobyl now around 1.5 Million. The worst of chernobyl wont be seen till 20 generation so it still has a lot of killing to do. Once nuclear isotopes are released they can never be cleaned up. Chernobyl was a very terrible disaster for the whole world but now there is Fukushima that is 100s of times bigger then Chernobyl.... the world will never be the same. we must help put a end to the nuclear genocide the nuclear industry is causing to the world before it ends humanity.http://enenews.com/expert-death-toll-estimate-chernobyl-around-15-million-people-video

chernobyl 185 tons nuclear fuel, one rector with core material only. caped in 12 to 14 days sealed with metal sarcophagus a little under a year, contaminated 77,000 sq/miles and to this day has killed 1.5 million people and 7 million people are effected but the worst wont be seen until 20 generations down the line so Chernobyl hasn't even started doing it worst damage to humanity yet.

Fukushima 1700 plus tons nuclear fuel, 4 reactors explode 3 externally 1 internally (reactor 2 exploded in the turbine building so its been leaking to sea uncontrollably to this very day), 40 years spent fuel (spent fuel million times more toxic then core material ), MOX plutonium in rector 3 which was the biggest explosion (MOX plutonium is recycled spent fuel and is 2 million times more toxic the core material), These were ocean cooled rectors and will continue to forever pollute the sea until a technology is developed to deal with the melted nuclear lava.

Air sampling showed people in Seattle usa breathed 5 to 10 hot particles a day in april 2011

They built engines of destruction, where the Jews were brutally murdered, beyond imagination. But the Jews were part and are of the German population. So, it was a war against its own people. Murdered were inter alia people with disabilities, vulnerable groups, dissidents, opposition figures, and so on. The aim was to continue this campaign throughout Europe, Russia, the whole world. Should arise anywhere a concentration camp, large parts of the population would and have been be destroyed.

But today, they invented modern “concentration camps”: The atomic reactors. They don’t kill us fast. But they kill millions in a lifetime (70) – and they simply lower the chance for healthy born children.

EXAMPLE: In 1985, a year before the Chernobyl disaster, 200 cases of malformations were recorded. In 2000, over 800 cases, however, despite a substantial decline in births: currently 14 to 15 000 births / year, against 28 to 30 000 before the Chernobyl disaster! http://www.dissident-media.org/infonucleaire/trait_25_26.html / page 2: “Anencephaly, severe spina bifida cystica, cleft lipsand/or palate, polydactyly, reduction limb defects leading to disability, esophageal atresia, anorectal atresias, Down’s syndrome and multiple malformations are registered both in stillborns and in fetuses obtained through induced abortion after prenatal diagnostics. The results are presented in Table 2 for the 137Cs contaminated areas and for the control.” quote and scan from:http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Lazjuk.pdf - ignored by WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR

Chernobyl: Development failures in the NEWBORN:http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/Lazyuk-ChernobylBelarus.pdf According to Michel Fernex (former WHO, Switzerland) The IAEA said in 1996: “Because there was no register in Belarus for malformations BEFORE Chernobyl, there are no abnormalities.” A LIE, not logic, unethic and unsicentific. – ignored by WHO, IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, BEIR

Rosa Goncharova‘s geneticist. In the Belarusian capital Minsk, she directs the laboratory of the Institute of Genetics and Cytology of the Belorussian Academy of Sciences. For decades, the research professor and her team investigated the effects of long-lasting radioactive low-level radiation.

What harm take people living in contaminated areas?

“Must live”, because there are 2600 villages that should relocate. Rosa Gonchrova summarizes the results of their studies (in german):

“One of the main lessons learned from Chernobyl is the fact that even low doses of ionizing radiation in animals and humans have biological and genetic consequences. This is now proven. They produce damage in the body cells and in the sex cells. Even at a low dose of less than 100 micro Sievert and even years at a tolerated dose of one millisievert were identified in our laboratory genetic changes.”

“About one Milllisievert per year: This is the annual dose limit for people who do not work professionally with ionizing radiations. For occupationally exposed persons in Europe are higher limits. The research team has identified mutations, ie changes in the genes of the nucleus.”

“Man, like every other living being possesses, protection systems, the repair such mutations almost. If there is now under the influence of radioactivity additional mutations, the organism will be charged additionally, he must also fight against it.”

“For these children we have found changes in individual genes. And the worst part is that these children show an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors. That is, these children fall ill more frequently than others. Among the unfavorable factors include poor diet, environmental factors, chemical pollution. This is true not only for children but for adults too. They all have an increased sensitivity to other unfavorable factors.”

“In plain English: who spends his life in contaminated areas spend, must, whose immune system is weakened.”

Radioactivity, as it opens the doors for other health problems.

The most dangerous radiation is which is ingested with food. Thus, for example, cesium-137 from the inside acts on the cells, because it displaces the vital potassium in muscle tissue. Or strontium-90, a radionuclide that accumulates in the bone and bone marrow: there it can damage blood cells and can cause cancer such as blood cancer.”

- On the question of whether changes in the genetic inheritance of future generations, says geneticist Rose Goncharova: “We demonstrated in our laboratory for the first time that genetic changes over generations may be swept on. We have found after Chernobyl more than 22 animal generations of genetic instability. There are animals that live in the contaminated areas who have to live under the influence of low doses. We have been scientifically proven.”

“This has been proven in one of the most common mammals in the bank vole. The cells of these mice were well comparable with those of humans, says the researcher. Therefore one can transmit many findings to him.”

“Even after 22 generations of mice you can still see changes, mutations. They are inherited. The radioactivity is harmful. So it happens that many offspring do not survive or even many embryos. Those who survive are somehow cope with the situation. But whose genome is unstable, and they also pass into the next generation. And often they are ill. Their whole system is more unstable than in other animals.”

“The mortality rate in these animals is very, very high. Mice produce very many offspring, and therefore they can afford a high death rate. Man, however, will usually produce only one child. In any case, not five, six, seven at once. He also does not bring several generations in a year or during his life to the world. So we can also transmit the results that actually would be transferable to humans, not in all respects to him.”

“Which low doses of radiation effects in humans may have, but points to a study that was published in December 2010 in Germany. It states: Within a radius of 35 km around a nuclear plant are fewer girls were born in areas without nuclear power. We investigated the surroundings of 27 facilities in Germany and four in Switzerland. Fewer female births have been noted previously: In regions that were hit by the Chernobyl radioactive precipitation. It is believed that female embryos are more sensitive to radiation and therefore die rather than male.”

Look for infertility after Chernobyl: “Primary infertility in the contaminated areas increased 5.5-fold in 1991 compared with 1986″ and “Impotence in young men (ages 25 to 30 years) correlated with the level of radioactivecontamination in a territory” page 118:http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf

“The level of alpha-radionuclides is significantly higher in bone tissue of aborted fetuses from mothers from the contaminated territories” – page 119.

What we have today, is the slow motion atomic holocaust. This is how it works:

Atomic industry and atomic catastrophes increased the mutation rate. In the early future “normal” people (like us) have a lower chance of a non disabled child or viable, as a “protected” elite has. This is the genetic clean out. It is based upon the Autosomal recessive modes of inheritance, because low irradiated food becomes high irradiated food / atomic waste, in the body and fires at the DNA, causes mutations. The mutation rate is increased by it. If “altered” partners fall in love and get a child, it is likely to be disabled, ill, not healthy. This is the principle they found out. One can say: Wait, mutation rates were always there, caused by natural background radiation <- that’s right, but radioactive Cesium, Strontium or Radio-Iodine weren’t there, before the atomic age. The act like natural elements. Your body don’t get the trick:

http://www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/Tritium_Radiation_Risks_Additional_Note_for_ODWAC_Fairlie.pdf – quote: “Background radiation is also the primary reason why women aged over ~40 areadvised not to have children. This is because their stocks of ova have been exposed since birth to 40 or so years’ background radiation and have thereby been damaged to such an extent that an unacceptable proportion, when fertilised, results in congenital malformations, spontaneous abortions or stillbirths. Many scientists also consider that background radiation is the prime factor in the ageing process, and is ultimately the reason why we are not immortal.” PAGE 5 – Now, artificial radiation makes us and our children even more mortal.

As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) was replaced by: As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP): To satisfy the ALARP principle, measures necessary to reduce risk must be taken until or unless the cost of those measures, whether money, time or trouble is disproportionate to the reduction in risk.” PAGE 170 – by UK Departement of Energy & Climatechange – QUOTE:

“The most important consideration is the generally accepted value judgment that early embryonic losses are of little personal or social concern.” Dr R. Mole, 1979, a member of ICRP – The international committee which makes the dose limits WORLDWIDE ignores LIFE.http://bjr.birjournals.org/content/52/614/89

-> Alfred Boetcher Scientific Director Nuclear Research Center Jülich, 1960 to 1966. Before 1945, director of Degussa and SS commander in Leiden, Holland. More:http://al.uni-koeln.de/Anti-G8-Buendnis_Koeln/Atomfusion_Ueberblick.pdf – quote: “The convicted SS Lieutenant-Colonel of Leiden (Netherlands), Alfred Boettcher was, from 1960 to 1966 President of the Nuclear Research CentreJülich and was responsible for building links with the apartheid state of South Africa and responsible for the military dictatorship in Brazil.”

There is high radiation caused in the research reactor “Jülich” map near the town “Karlsruhe”. In the 1970ies few scandals happened there and they need to be inspected again. Jülich came into service in 1963. It is a pebble bed reactor. It went offline in 1978 after the worst case scenario nearly happend. Source

-> William Groth, employs in Jülich in the 1960s, director of the Institute of Physics and Chemistry in Bonn and a member of the Board of the German Atomic Forum. 1936-1945 Political leader of the NSDAP and staff at the Army Ordnance Department on the atomic bomb project. More:http://al.uni-koeln.de/Anti-G8-Buendnis_Koeln/Atomfusion_Ueberblick.pdf quote: “The Nazi leader Wilhelm Groth research before 1945 under the Nazis to the atomic bomb in order to continue the war in Jülich.”

They recognized that nuclear weapons will kill quickly and warlike, are too conspicuous. The peaceful atom, however, needs a long time to kill (latency). It kills peaceful as the name implies. And clean. And without evidence (Iodine 131 has a half life of 8 days, is particularly effective in children and unborn babies).

The indirect chemical damage to cell membranes in the low dose range is much more important than the direct effect of radiation on the nucleus with its genetic material. In the nucleus there appears to be much stronger repair mechanisms than in the cell membranes. This is consistent with the purposes of evolution: Increasingly higher development of life. First and foremost, namely the genes in the nucleus had greatly developed by repair mechanisms to be protected. Only then could the nature of the gene pool protect itself against the highly damaging properties of natural radiation, and thus maintain the relative stability of species over millions of years.

But in contrast to the gene pool, individual members of populations (plants, animals, people) for the evolution are not so important to the contrary, her constant death and her replacement by reproduction is an important evolutionary process. The repair mechanisms in the cell membranes were needed, but weren’t so important, because you only caused diseases, but no genetic defects. And if one member of a population has fulfilled its evolutionary role of reproduction, sit is no longer needed, so a life extension beyond the reproductive age is also not absolutely necessary. This is for the survival of animals and plant species are not necessarily problematic, however, for human society. Each individual hopes to a long and healthy life, far beyond reproduction age. In addition, an adaptation to environmental toxic substances in humans is not possbile, because of the generational change phaes which are very long. But we add more radiation by atomic energy with it’s low radiation emission, accidents, catastrophes – which are peeks.

Prepare YOURSELF with this easy to understand study-consumption: LOW RADIATON is MORE DANGEROUS than some HIGH RADIATION: The BIMODAL effect of low radiation on health – proven by Burlakova 1996, ignored by science and IAEA, today’s science ONLY looks for LINEAR dose effects. They use the model of HIGH radiation (acute syndrome) on LOW radiation effects (cancer, diseases, mutation – …) – result: ALL radiation victims are and latency in general ignored! http://www.life-upgrade.com/DATA/BurlakovaChernobyl-Belarus.pdf

Let’s take CESIUM and STRONTIUM:

Half-life is only so that half of the radiation is gone. You have every half-life multiplied by ten in order to have an idea when this radioisotope is gone from the biological environment. That would be in strontium and cesium 400 years.

Latency: 20 – 25 years mature people / 4 years children (Chernobyl happens grows today, illness, death, cancer increase and not decrease, as WHO and IAEA say)

This is the upturned pyramid. The cesium is biological similar to the potassium and the human body can not distinguish between the good potassium and cesium.

The body takes it on the breath and the food. You can not protect yourself.

After intake, the cesium builds self into the body cells and destroys the energy balance of cells. It does not matter whether it consists of the liver, kidney or brain cells involved.

These infected cell dies, after she pulls even before their neighbors suffer.

Thus begins a weird cycle:

How life begins with a cell starts in this case the death. Children are more vulnerable because their cells divide constantly.

As they grow, they need constant energy and constant need to cope with the damage to their cells.

25 years with Chernobyl:

The adults at that time have survived 25 years and are now ill. In about 4 years we’re going to see the same with japanese children.

Quiet Death.

The then children are already suffering much earlier – often with fatal consequences.

The cesium is present in the inheritance cells.

Precarious, is that the cesium implants in the ovaries and the eggs of women. Because they renew, they are damaged for life.

Although renewed in sperm, they also give more information to the injury during fertilization. Either, it can no longer be fathered children, or they get through father and mother misinformation in the future. The result you can not even imagine.

The authorities in Japan had long ago have put women and children in the south of the country. Why they did not is, in my view, totally incomprehensible. There will be massive leukemia. This cesium cloud is a disaster for the Japanese, and from all other radionuclides, we know nothing.

The body can not distinguish between Calcium and Strontium. If it is taken in through the food chain. It is built into the bones and teeth, shines there and hits the bone marrow, where sit the blood-forming organs: The stem cells that give rise to the red and white blood cells and platelets.

These cells are damaged by Strontium, and indeed a lifetime, because the strontium remains where it is: irradiating with short and beta radiation.

This is proven also by the Bob Hopkins study from 1973. The Department of Public Health proved with the study of Kurihara “cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries japan society” from nov 1972 Tohoku /Japan, that there was an 600 % increase in children mortality of japanese chidren age 5 till 9 years, after the Hrioshima and Nagasaki atomic test.

No dictator has ever had so much power! To kill future generations!

World Health OrganizationJapan Nuclear ConcernsFAQs

14 March 2011

Question: What is WHO’s role in nuclear emergencies?Answer: Within the United Nations system, the IAEA is the lead agency for coordination of international response to radiation events.

The assessment of health damage caused by Chernobyl and Fukushima was done by the IAEA (protects nuclear power), NOT by the WHO (protecting people) – according to Alison Katz, who worked 18 years for the WHO. More:http://independentwho.info/

“Presently the international organizations (WHO, IAEA) recognize as the main cause of increase of thyroid cancer in liquidators and children population after the accident their irradiation with radioactive iodine, I-131. The rest of diseases, they suppose, are provoked by psycho-emotional reactions..” (!!!…RADIOPHOBIA…!!!) There is no linear dose effect correlation, but “The bimodal dependence of effects on dose was revealed for all studied parameters. Namely, effects increased at low doses, reached maximum (for low doses), then decreased (in some cases the effect sign reversed) and thereafter increased with the increase of dosage”: http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr21/kr21pdf/Burlakova.pdfIGNORED BY IAEA, UNSCEAR, ICRP, WHO

Each person has been exposed to a certain dose of radiation that had to be estimated later (!) Because of the location of the bomb explosion at the moment (T65D study). It is at HIGH DOSE SHORT TERM (explosion). This is in contrast to chronic low-level radiation. ICRP, UNSCEAR and BEIR exclude results that you get from high doses to the low dose effects. THIS IS A CRIME and unscientific and unethic.

So far, the WHO took always the same heading as the IAEA: So-called internal radiation, “in the body is enriched, not dangerous. This is now over.

“There is no safe low levels of radiation, ” said WHO Director General Margaret Chan on Wednesday during a short meeting scheduled with members of the critical “initiative for an independent WHO “. By the former Ukrainian, Russian and Western European doctors and radiation biologists, and WHO staff based initiative has been demonstrating daily about four years before the WHO Office for cancellation of the agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

So far, the WHO had always taken the position specified by the IAEA, radioactive radiation below certain limits is NOT dangerous. Chan was referring in her testimony to the internal radiation from radioactive particles – such as Iodine 131, Cesium 137, Strontium 90, plutonium – they are being absorbed through food, water or air into the body and are deposited in the thyroid, bones or internal organs and continue radiation.

These particles are, after numerous studies by independent scientists who carried out since the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl in April 1986, responsible for up to 95 percent of all cancers caused by radiation and genetic changes. The WHO has denied the internal radiation up to today, and in all statements regarding potential health risks only to external radiation – based and related measurements with the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 – for example by a passing by radioactive cloud.

Chan distanced himself from Chernobyl sayings of the WHO

Chan distanced itself from the recent statements made by the WHO on the consequences of Chernobyl. “I personally do not believe that the nuclear accident in Chernobyl has claimed only 50 lives,” WHO Director-General said, according to transcripts of the interview with the critic initiative. In accordance with the IAEA, the WHO official said today, as a result of the Chernobyl disaster were only 52 people died and irradiated up to 6,000 more infected with thyroid cancer. These figures also took over the UN Commission of Atomic Scientists, and finally published in February this year.

Notwithstanding the correction of previous positions Chan insisted on and got to look at the current nuclear disaster in Fukushima “fully recognized its responsibility,” the WHO. And this “without restriction by the bilateral agreements with the IAEA in 1959.” Chan defended against the critics, too, that the WHO has to date the results of measurement to Fukushima under wraps, she and the IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 80 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere.

WHO has, however, Fukushima-measurement results under wraps

The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, which also has access to the measurement results of the CTBT0, presented at the end of fixed March with a significantly higher leakage of radioactivity from Fukushima, when the Japanese authorities – based on their data, the WHO and the IAEA – publicly announced. Chan said the WHO would be the CTBTO measurement data “publish only if it’s dangerous values.” If that was the case, they decide “alone”. At the same time admitted the Director-General, that “no expert on radiation,” and that the WHO “on this issue today almost at all has not within the jurisdiction more.” The Department of Radiobiology at the Geneva WHO headquarters was closed two years ago under pressure from private and public donors. Earlier, the deputy head of the department with the attempt to impose lower limits for WHO Iodine intake failed on objections by the IAEA and France:http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf

WHO hushed Chernobyl Conference documents

Today in the WHO Geneva headquarters, only a single radiation biologist. Chan said the “Initiative for an independent WHO” to “investigate what happened to the documents of 2001, organized jointly with the IAEA Chernobyl conference in Kiev,” she wanted. So far, the WHO claims falsely that the documents had been published in full.

In fact, only a brief summary was published. Of the more than 700 documents of the first Chernobyl conference, conducted in 1995 jointly by WHO and IAEA in Geneva, have been published to date, only twelve. The IAEA had prevailed, citing the agreement with the WHO, the then WHO Director-General Nakashima been confirmed in a television interview.

“Calculations based on models used by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) show that dietary intake of the maximum amount of radioactive contamination permitted in the EU and Japan would lead to at least roughly 150,000 fatalities in Germany each year. Other calculation models reach vastly higher figures. If the entire German population were to eat foods exposing individuals to only 5 percent of the contamination currently allowed in food imports from Japan, at least 7,700 fatalities could be expected; this figure doesn’t even include the secondary consequences of a wide range of greatly varying diseases and genetic disorders.”

Prof. Jacobi – Director of the Institute for Radiation Protection of the Society for Radiation and Environmental Research Ltd. Munich (http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/04/091/4091257.pdf) – Neaherbergm, said in his speech from March 3rd 1973, that he is representing a maximum acceptable radiation risk of the population (without asking them!) and assumed that a civilizational radiation risk exists only when it is visible. The risk would be only low (and therefore should be acceptable and useful), that in the existing natural (spontaneous) frequency of cancer of the total population it would be not detected! For Germany, it seemed (in 2350 spontaneous cancer deaths per million inhabitants), a maximum of ten deaths per year and per million inhabitants is ACCEPTABLE! That makes (80 million people in Germany) 800 cancer deaths by nuclear power stations per year, ACCEPTABLE! Is this still a democracy? Such a drug might would have never get the permission to come on the market! But it is nuclear energy, which is allowed! Thus ANY MURDER WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE, because people die anyway! More:http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/low-radiation-kills-everything-trees-children-green-energy-peace-climate-democracy-mind-science/

Because reactors depend on heavy water as a moderator, they release larger amounts of tritium to the environment than light water reactors (…) Tritium is a carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and developmental toxin. It becomes incorporated into DNA and disrupts the genetic code of men’s and women’s reproductive cells:http://www.iicph.org/files/IICPH-Final-Statement-re-Darlington-NNPP-May-17-20… – current Guideline and Drinking Water Quality Standard for tritium is 7,000 Bq/L, which is based on the permissible ICRP dose limit of 1 mSv/year (lowered to 0.1 mSv in water). This “standard” corresponds to a risk of 350 excess fatal cancers per million people from just one year’s consumption of drinking water, not a lifetime (70 years) 300 million people living in the US: 105,000 DEATHS PER YEAR x 30 years = 3,150,000 murdered people by the peaceful atom! Multiplied x global = weapons of mass destruction.

The architecture of peaceful murder: Each cooling pipe shall possess a safety valve that has the purpose of automatically releasing any excess steam pressure. The crucial point is that these valves are located above the reactor lid and below the cargo front. Regarding Chernobyl: And you have seen that has raised shortly before the first explosion the lid of the fuel vapor channels. There was a nuclear explosion. Source: Robert Green, Hinkley Point in 1990, Don Arnott (chemist), Richard Webb (engineer for nuclear physics). These valves are there, that there is no congestion and pressure, which could allow the reactor to explode. The atomic eugenic industry needs these security systems: The reactor is used to emit mutagenic and lethal gases.

Why is the IAEA based in Austria, where the construction of nuclear reactors is prohibited by law? The International Atomic Energy Association – adress: Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria. AND: In 1978 Austria in a referendum voted against the utilisation of nuclear power for energy generation:http://www.umweltnet.at/article/articleview/69109/1/1458. By the way: The WHO has to date the results of measurements of Fukushima under wraps. The IAEA regularly receives from the international authority to monitor agreements on nuclear weapons test ban (CTBTO). The world’s 80 monitoring stations of the CTBTO to register around the clock, the radioactivity in the atmosphere. The “Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Vienna, also has access to the measurement results of the CTBTO.

Gentler Fascism: Quality Management – today found everywhere – is important to keep problems, accidents, incidents In the system / company / company / group, and not making them public. Regulation and supervision was born where the criteria were very strict: Intelligence agencies, aerospace companies, research, nuclear industry, military… This is now increasingly becoming a threat. For freedom and health.

I witnessed the change in Belarus also. Exactly from the moment on, when the construcion contract of the new belarusian atomic power plant was signed (March 2011, during Fukushima explosion) Belarus stumpled into a hyperinflation. The bad economic situation created an increase of monitoring of belarusians by KGB and Police. Many belarusian friends told me, that when you go shopping, after work, doors are closed and suddelny civil police asks you for your ID. You have to tell them where you work. And even if it is your freetime they phone your work giver and ask him. Although you did nothing wrong, your work giver will have a chat with you the next day. This is senseless, criminal, but effective. Everywhere there are registration books, where people write down when you come and when you go. Even in kindergarten. The new reactor is a threat to all democratic development in Belarus. Belarus has become a hostage to Russia, because Russia’s ROSATOM is building it. Belarus got a credit of more than 2 billion Dollars by Russia, to pay the reactor. Then, three months later, got a credit by the IWF. Neither the construction nor the maintenance nor the operation nor the fuel cycle is self controlled by Belarus. It’s totally owned by Russia and it’s company ROSATOM. In Japan: TEPCO can irradiate hundreds of thousands or millions of people – it is protected by the state and even praised by the IAEA – the servant of the military and atomic industry:http://www.independentwho.info/ What will happen with the democracy in Japan? This is the situation in Belarus right now: http://toxaby.livejournal.com/514571.html?view=11193611

Excerpt from hard to get paper “The Main Scientific Reports” – International Congress “The World after Chernobyl” Minsk (Belarus), 1996 – by russian atomic physicist in the former Soviet Union, Prof. Vassili Nesterenko (BELRAD Institute, Minsk: http://www.belrad-institute.org/) He was one of the last independet scientists in Belarus and a liquidator during the Chernobyl catastrophe (atomic reactor explosion in 1986). Belarus adapted a program in the mid 90ies which calls irradiated areas of 1 – 5 C/km² as clean and stopped money. The same happens in JAPAN:

Is shutting down reactors are solution? Technically, yes, ethically and medically -> only conditionally. For the development of the species, it is too late.

What has been done can not be undone, even if ALL reactors are shut dow: Increased mutation rates (insects, small mammals, humans, mutation means: cancer after generations, diseases, disabilities), less chance of healthy newborns, , increased impotence and infertility, leukemia. The species has been changed, the damage in the DNA, for eternity. Even if the half-lifes are gone in some distant future. Then you can safely shut down the nuclear power plants and sell it as a victory of reason.. After a certain predetermined plan of course. The atomic philosophy of eugenics: You can shut down the reactors. But not the half-lives. Not the modification of your DNA. Not the pre-programmed mutations and the principle of autosomal recessive modes of inheritance. Alltogether, your children will become sick or not viable. We are the culprits, perpetrators, but we created based on energy, like radio-iodine, which quickly disappears. A dose-response relationship which is not linear, is rejected by our science. We created it, the murdering peaceful atom. Powered by the United Nations. Radiation protection recommendations and commissions are our strategy for socially acceptable, slow, clean mass murder.