A Woman Explains Why Chicks Dig Jerks

Why hear it from an evil player when you can read a normal, everyday woman tell you how much chicks love assholes? This girl confirms the Chateau maxim that Do Almost Nothing Game is an important component of any man’s arsenal of ardor.

Curiously familiar hypothetical situation: You’re at a bar with your friends when you spot a guy you recently hooked up with. You’re feeling indifferent about him, but you wouldn’t be opposed to giving it another go. You think, “Ehh, no need to say ‘Hi’ right away.” Twenty minutes later, he still hasn’t approached you. You wonder, “Why hasn’t he said anything to me? Does my hair look bad?” But granted you’re not criminally insane, you brush it off and look for someone else to schmooze. Thirty minutes later, still nothing. Well, he did wink at you from across the bar (or was there just something stuck in his eye?), but then he started talking to some girl wearing a tube dress. Your confusion escalates. “Oh god, she’s way hotter than me. I knew I should’ve worn heels.” Suddenly, your neurosis reaches “Girl, Interrupted” levels and you wonder how you got so nuts. To avoid further humiliation, you turn to a friend and ask if she wants to leave and get nachos.

Yes, the Asshole U Luv knows when and how to parcel his attentions. He knows that ignoring you to flirt with another woman in your line of sight makes you horny and desirous of him.

Fact: Girls love guys who are, for lack of a better description, total assholes.

Any man who’s lived a day in his life knows this is true. Deniers are true blue brainwashed believers in gender equalism, whores who have gotten stiffed by assholes one too may times and purify their damaged psyches within an imaginary reality, or… well… pretty much all women for whom any fact about female nature is discomfiting.

We’ve seen it time and time (and time?) again, but nonetheless, it’s an issue that riddles our minds with confusion, stress and a shitton of excitement. So, what’s a girl to do about this bleak reality?

Sit back and enjoy my beef jerky intrusion. After all, you may as well ask what’s a man to do about his lust for hot, young, slender babes with pert tits and firm asses.

The authoress goes on to list reasons why she thinks women swoon for assholes.

Most girls are turned off by a guy who showers her with attention. It bores us, it seems desperate and it can be a predictor for a slew of undesirable behaviors lurking beneath the surface. Instead, we gravitate toward guys who give us just enough attention to keep us on our toes. Here’s what I mean:

Socially-unaware-nice-guy: Hi Rachel! I saw you from across the bar. You look pretty. Can I buy you a drink? You look like a G&T gal. So, what are your career aspirations? I love kids. You look pretty.

Asshole: Hey.

She is one of the few self-aware chicks who gets it. I’m sure it’s soul-ripping for my detractors to see my Do Almost Nothing Game and One Word Game confirmed by female experience.

Think about it. Have you ever seen a guy you’ve recently hooked up with and waited an hour for him to start flirting with you? And worse, did you feel great when he finally approached you and probably said a total of four syllables that somehow made you feel on top of the world?

Forget the wordy, clever openers. Keep it succinct, stupid.

Don’t be embarrassed if that’s a yes. We’re aroused by the unpredictability of waiting for a guy to strike up a conversation with us, and the longer it takes, the more rewarded we feel when it actually happens.

Value of scarcity. Why do women love men who make their availability scarce? I submit this universal female preference has its roots in preselection — women get turned on by these types of men because in the fevered downtime the women muse that his unavailability is caused by other women occupying his time.

You know what? It’s a cop-out to say only weak girls go for assholes. Self-esteem aside, many girls crave the thrill of keeping up with a jerky guy, or better yet, putting him in his place.

This admission was like a stake through the haters’ hearts. The “low self-esteem girls fall for jerks” rationale is the go-to lie of nerdy internet femtards everywhere.

While they might not always be better at flirting per se, assholes have a certain knack for conversation that confident girls can’t wait to provoke.

Yes, it’s called passing shit tests with ease.

When you’re not looking for anything serious, few things are sexier than a well-spoken, quick-talking guy whose comebacks somehow indicate that he’ll be amazing in bed.

She’s admitting that women put up bitch shields to test men for their alpha worthiness, and that men who pass their shit tests are automatically deemed more viscerally attractive. I’m coming to the conclusion that 80% of early game, when attraction is being built, is basically passing a woman’s shit tests.

Entertaining as his drunken tales are, [Tucker Max] has spawned a new breed of wannabe assholes who masquerade as genuinely awesome guys by mimicking traits like confidence, charm and humor in the forms of aggression, sleaze and flirtatious insults. It’s difficult for our drunken brains to distinguish between worthwhile guys and those who embody that second set of qualities — and for most casual flings, we don’t care to evaluate the difference. In fact, getting attention from an identified asshole can seem weirdly special.

A clarification is in order: it’s difficult for drunken *and* sober women alike to resist the charms of the asshole seducer.

And why is it weirdly special to receive an asshole’s attention? Because women imagine, rightly so in most cases, that the asshole is the apple of many other women’s eyes. And so to be the recipient of his bastard charms is to know that his quality seed is hers for the moment.

Example: If a guy won’t give other people the time of day, but he’s taking a moment of his time to be semi-decent toward you, you might think to yourself “Wow, this guy’s being nice to me. He’s usually such a douche! I must be different.” False.

Women also get turned on by the thought that they are defeating other women for the prize studs.

In the end, there’s no clear way to stay away from guys who play these games. It seems the best we can do is hold our heads high, stay on our toes and sleep with one eye open.

147 Responses

Entertaining as his drunken tales are, [Tucker Max] has spawned a new breed of wannabe assholes who masquerade as genuinely awesome guys by mimicking traits like confidence, charm and humor in the forms of aggression, sleaze and flirtatious insults. It’s difficult for our drunken brains to distinguish between worthwhile guys and those who embody that second set of qualities — and for most casual flings, we don’t care to evaluate the difference.

damn, that is one ugly truth. Of course, I blame Hollywood for feeding men these lies from day one. Think about it, from Ralph Macchio in the Karate Kid to the latest beta bait movie, guys are being fed bad advice (although Mattew McConengy seems to be better role model).

If the “low self-esteem” argument is true in any direction of jerks versus nice guys, it would be true in the nice guys direction.

Let’s limit low self-esteem to women who truly, deeply hate their own guts and have zero perspective on their own worth or what they could be worth. In order to live with themselves and have someone externally validate them, and for someone to be able to cope with the moody behaviour they exhibit, he needs to be a nice guy. She wouldn’t be attracted to a guy other women are hugely attracted to: she doesn’t find him attainable and doesn’t think she could keep him. She thinks of him as way out of her league and finds his ‘jerky’ behaviour frightening; he tramples all over her too easily. She would tend to be extremely shy, not confident and settles easily: all things that predispose to being paired off with a nicer guy.

All that’s a simplication. “Low self-esteem” has such a wide purview and multiple manifestations that it’s practically meaningless as a word. If you look through any book on self-esteem and what behaviours can be attributed it, its pretty much 99.999% of being human.

The only mistake or remaining delusion the female writer being quoted made is to think that she is “accidentally” confusing assholes with charming, confident men, or that the “asshole” is a regrettable side-effect of an otherwise confident, charming man. Quite the contrary, it is the assholery that makes the man charming. Women love it because it adds drama.

Once you understand these things, you start seeing the principles everywhere. For example, Guinevere in Tennyson’s Idylls of the King talking about why she cheats on Arthur (the ultimate chivalrous “white knight”) with Lancelot:

“She broke into a little scornful laugh:
‘Arthur, my lord, Arthur, the faultless King,
That passionate perfection, my good lord –
But who can gaze upon the sun in heaven?
He never spake word of reproach to me,
He never had a glimpse of mine untruth,
He cares not for me. …
… but, friend, to me
He is all fault who hath no fault at all.
For who loves me must have a touch of earth;”

She loves Lancelot precisely because he is not too good. She hates Arthur because he is too trusting, and sees his devotion as disqualifying.

Yet more proof that most classic tales are classic because they incorporate timeless truths about human relationships.

It’s interesting to me that that journalism major at U. Wisconsin mentions Tucker Max but not game. She sounds like she’s read CR. I suppose though she’s really only talking in that article about the asshole side of game, which Tucker Max champions, without as I recall his using the world game much.

I suppose Tucker Max is probably better known on campuses than game is. College guys and some college girls make up a large part of his readership and he went on a national book tour to college campuses.

Any guys currently or very recently in college want to weigh in on how widely game is known about there?

Many years ago I had an interview for a job as a mortgage salesman. The guy interviewing me was being a real dick, but for some reason I just didn’t care that day. It was obviously a crappy job with a crappy outfit I didn’t want so that helped. For all his dickery I was just “Whatever.”

The interview concluded and I walked out. Then the guy comes running out into the parking lot and tells me, “You should definitely come work here, I think you’d do good, I like you.”

I didn’t take the job. The guy had mistaken me for somebody able to nonchalantly deal with shit tests, which like game is about 80% of being a salesman.

The trick is having the sack to be nonchalant when you really do care, that is you really want to fuck her.

The list of classics incorporating similar principles is practically endless. What’s funny, too, is that while elite PC hysteria typically tries to suppress the obvious, these principles neverthelses inevitably appear – most often in the pop culture realm the elite disdains. You can find the same thing with many of those less-classic but popular works. Roissy’s regular series on game in the movies is a good example; Katy Perry’s “Hot & Cold” (I can’t listen to it without thinking push-pull); gangsta culture in hip-hop; one could go on.

Lines kin to the Tennyson, from the pen of a woman (Katherine Mansfield):

“The mind I love must have wild places, a tangled orchard where dark damsons drop in the heavy grass, an overgrown little wood, the chance of a snake or two, a pool that nobody’s fathomed the depth of, and paths threaded with flowers planted by the mind.”

You’re kidding, right? She has fucked so many random guys that she thinks it is a curiously familiar experience to walk into a bar and see some guy across the room that she has fucked, but doesn’t know well enough to say hello. Yet, she is ready to fuck him again, if only he will walk across the bar to her. She talks about falling for these guys when she is drunk (which I get the feeling is most nights) and finally, she warns female readers to sleep with one eye open. Why, so the bastard doesn’t eat all your Chinese food before sneaking out at 3am.

Today, she thinks of sex as no more significant than shaking hands. She will likely rethink that in 10 years or so.

Indeed, indeed. As far all chicks vs some chicks, I like to think of it as a continuum, same as alpha-beta. Primativeness. Falling for some real criminal or alco deadbeat probably has some low self esteem involved. But since when just saying “hey” instead of nice guy speech above qualifies you as an asshole? So much for equality 🙂 Yes, scarcity is the key. Countless times in my natural days floating between lesser alpha/greater beta/utter beta I’ve blown myself out by babbling too much.

I think this point has been well-established. What isn’t discussed is the skill of actually closing for a number, kiss, date, whatever…

So you’ve got a target girl, you maintain dominant non-verbal, run good aloof asshole game, deliver good neg, receive IOIs…then what? How do you transition into the guy that gets what he’s looking for without going from aloof guy to beta needy try-hard loser? It seems to me that at some point you have to reveal that you are at least interested in something the girl has to offer…how do you do this without spoiling your frame?

The whole thing is completely true, as a matter of fact me and my ex had an email exchange about a week on this same subject. We still keep in touch but live a long ways apart. She sent me an email asking how I’m doing. I was feeling alittle down and basically I told her I fucked things up with another girl (we’re fine talking about that stuff). Anyways, most of what she said I already knew but I feel her response is the most honest advice a female can give a man, here it is: (only edited out my name, everything else is copy pasted, even spelling and grammatical errors):

“About your predicament, seeing as how I don’t really know too much about your relationships with these girls I can only speak on my own accord. Honestly ***** you’re a great guy. And when you used to be a jerk to girls they were blowing up you’re phone looking for you and all that shit.
The only thing I could say is to be a little bit of that person again. When you first meet a girl and you like her, and you guys hit it off and she’s giving you bedroom eyes, back off a little.
It’s sad to say but it’s all a game, and finding a balance between being aloof and being a great guy will keep their interest and keep them coming your way.
No one likes to jump into anything too fast. It’s something I’ve had to realize over the past year. Date them, don’t sleep with them right away, don’t call them everyday, keep your own routine in tact, return phone calls….
I’m not saying be a jerk, but it’s okay to keep her guessing a little. Don’t show all your cards at the beginning.
When people say that girls like jerks its a little true. It just means we don’t like the nice guy who will give us everything all at once.
Watch; buy them a drink, open doors, don’t sleep with them, and don’t call ’em for a couple days. If they act distant, give them space, and don’t ask what’s wrong. When they don’t feel like they are the center of your world(and I’m using that very loosely) they will want to be.”

That’s because it is indeed not that much more significant if there is no risk of pregnancy, and middle/old age is far away, so mutual support in a committed couple matters.

What what I read of the gay dating scene, that is indeed the same attitude. If there is no pregnancy involved, a girl is not that different from a boy with an anus both front and back (sometimes the tits are bigger though). The pussy is the new ass.

I think that to some extent Roissy/Citizen Renegade overdoes the sociobiological point of view and does not realize that hetero dating seems to become very similar to homo dating (at least as in the big city gay scene as described a bit luridly in the press and some books).

«She will likely rethink that in 10 years or so.»

Perhaps in middle age she will discover that mutual support in a committed couple matters, and sexual fidelity underpins that.

That to some extent seems also what I read of the evolution of some/many gay dating lives: eventually settle down with a committed partner, after sitting for a couple decades on the cock carousel as a single or at most in an open relationship.

My problem is i’m small (5 ‘9 and 155-160bs) and often when i’m an asshole (it comes fairly naturally) I think women think i’m a bitter little prick or just pure of just a jerk. Is there anyway for guys of smaller stature to be an asshole without being percieved as bitter? Sometimes it’s fine other times it clearly doesn’t work. I’m not a fighting pikey working class asshole, more of an aloof dick haha.

I’m good looking and workout, well muscled / athletic, not trying to game 6’ women either before anyone asks.

The problem with the woman looking for a committed relationship in middle age is … “What’s in it for me?” will be the response of any guy she might consider. At best she’ll get very damaged goods, probably be better alone with cats.

In order for women to get a committed relationship past attractiveness, she has to “pay” with pair-bonding exclusive sex during actual, real attractiveness, and not have many partners interfering with said bonding (like max 1-2 prior).

Therefore, women as a group can look forward to men being total jerks (since women dig them) and ignored in favor of younger/hotter women once they age. When they’re older they’ll be invisible annoyances.

So you’ve got a target girl, you maintain dominant non-verbal, run good aloof asshole game, deliver good neg, receive IOIs…then what? How do you transition into the guy that gets what he’s looking for without going from aloof guy to beta needy try-hard loser?

You’ve described the attraction phase. You’ve also got to do some of the comfort/DHV phase as well (with attraction phase push stuff sprinkled back in) to get the number, or anyway the number that won’t be at very high risk of flaking.

For the number just say: “hey, give me your number. I’d like to talk with you some more, but I’ve got to jump now.” Or something like. Never ask if you can have it. Banish “may I”, “could I”, “would you like”, “how about” etc. from your vocabulary. The closest you should come to that is “let’s” but that’s often too weak in the beginning.

If you’re talking about the seduction phase, the core thing is to keep building attraction and comfort until her temperature is high, and then to tease her into non verbally (or verbally) asking for the kiss, and then sex. That often defeats the “not so fast” LMR. If not on that date the next one. Have the frame that you are all the more attracted to girls so into you (banish the thought of slut from your mind) that they move quickly with you. You love girls that love sex.

Jim, I don’t think you are that far outside of the average range to be considered “small.” Especially if you’re fit. 5′ 9″ 155 lbs is a marine-like physique. 160 pounds and you probably have some muscle.

You’re not going to win any girls over with that height, but its not low enough to scare them away. I don’t think 5′ 9″ gets you the dreaded “he’s short” description from women. If you’re ripped, I definitely wouldn’t worry about your weight. Maybe stay away from wearing shorts.

If you were 5′ 7″, 145 lbs, then you might be right: could be perceived as bitter, Napoleon complex short guy.

I guess “building comfort” is the area that confuses me. What kinds of things do this? In my minimal “gaming”, I just ask them questions and let them blab. Should I be trying to be sensitive and throwing in kino or something?

There are definitely girls who are serious about finding a nice guy who’s equally serious about them.
But I think a big part of the problem here is that you guys are looking in the wrong places, or looking for the wrong types of girls.

Wrong places: If you’re trying to look for a nice girl, who’s open to nice guys, then a trendy bar on Friday or Saturday night is the wrong place to look. I shouldn’t have to tell you why!

You’re looking for the wrong types of girls: If you make it clear that you’re looking for a “fast” girl, whether or not you’re the type that those girls go for, then the better marriage-minded girls will turn themselves off to you.
And, even if a nice girl decides that it’s time for her to make a “mistake” (lol) then guess what? She’s not going to make that mistake with a Nice Guy who’s sexuality and aggressiveness is forced. She’ll go for the guy who’s naturally like that, because at least that way it’s actually going to … work.

But at the end of the day there are actually a lot of girls who really don’t dig jerks. But they just aren’t going to be found in the places where you guys are looking.

Wrong places: If you’re trying to look for a nice girl, who’s open to nice guys, then a trendy bar on Friday or Saturday night is the wrong place to look.

Don’t think we haven’t heard this cliché many times. It’s not true. All types of people from all walks of life goes to “trendy bars on a Friday or Saturday night.” You’ve never went to bars?

I think every woman I’ve ever met has gone to bars at least a few times in their life. It’s a social gathering, men and women meet there. A little alcohol loosens things up. What’s wrong with this? Only sluts and assholes go there?

There are definitely girls who are serious about finding a nice guy who’s equally serious about them.
But I think a big part of the problem here is that you guys are looking in the wrong places, or looking for the wrong types of girls.”

lozozozlzlzozozllzlzozolzozozlzlzozlzlzozlzlzlz one time i got herpes on my eyeborse as i was looking formlove in all da wrong places lzozlzozlzlzlzlozz on my eyebrows looking in all da worng places lzozlzozlzlzozlzozlzlzozlzlzozozozl

“Wrong places: If you’re trying to look for a nice girl, who’s open to nice guys, then a trendy bar on Friday or Saturday night is the wrong place to look. I shouldn’t have to tell you why!”

HEY FUCKTARD!!! THE ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN NOT IN A TRENDY BAR BUT IN A FUCKING COLLEGE NEWPSPAPEDR BY AND EUDATED OWMEN LOZLZOZZOZLZOZLZ.

“You’re looking for the wrong types of girls: If you make it clear that you’re looking for a “fast” girl, whether or not you’re the type that those girls go for, then the better marriage-minded girls will turn themselves off to you.
And, even if a nice girl decides that it’s time for her to make a “mistake” (lol) then guess what? She’s not going to make that mistake with a Nice Guy who’s sexuality and aggressiveness is forced. She’ll go for the guy who’s naturally like that, because at least that way it’s actually going to … work.”

HOW OCME NOBOYD NOTONE WOMEN EVER STANDS UP FOR DA GIRL WHO GHOT BUTTHEXED AND HAD IT TAPED SECRTELY ZLOZLZOZLZ IT IS BEACUSE WOMEN LOVE DOUCHEBAGS AND ASSCKOCKERS AND SODOIMTES AND SECRTEIVE TAPERS OF BUTTHEX WITHOUT ETH GIRLSTHCONTHENT WHICH IS WHY THEY FUND FINANCE PUBLISH PROMOT”E AND REPETAE THE PR LIES LOF THE ASSCOCKING DOUHEBEGAS LOZLZOXLXLXLXOXOXOXXOXLXXLXLZOZPZPZ

lzozlzozlzozlzlzolzozlzl

omg do i have ta yell just so you can see relaity i mna just open your eyes, wipe teh spolooge out of them, and loookkkky looky look!!! lzozlzozlozlzlz

“But at the end of the day there are actually a lot of girls who really don’t dig jerks. But they just aren’t going to be found in the places where you guys are looking.”

so anyeways teh fiat masters trianed owmen in the arts of divorce debuachery deseefxation destruction lozlzolzlzlz and abortion and debt creation, and as womenze rose to power on teh ffront lines of the epreemptive wars against teh unborn they murdered 50,000,000 since rose vs. wade they deconstructed and debuached tehc ulture on campuses as when yhou put womenze in charge it soons becomes all butthex all the time as priscilia paintion woemnze editor in chief of simon and schuster is publishing tucker max’s next book zlzolslssslslsoslsoslzozlzlzlzlz c hecks che-=checks it out peoples are saying and speaking out about the way womenze are debucahing defiling and butthexing the culture lozlzlzlzlzl:

RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

“Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

Dear Ms. Painton,

I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

“Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”

Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

“The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

“Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

“Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

“Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?

the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

What’s up with women these days?

It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

“11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

[I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

[To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

[To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

[To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

[To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.

“A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
and Government’s War on Fathers”

“The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

–http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
–Vince Vaughn

When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

“My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
“I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

Review for End The Fed
“Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
–Arlo Guthrie

“Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
–Vince Vaughn

Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

“Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/

I agree that there are some girls, with life experience and self-reflection, who figure things out a little bit and learn to avoid straight up jerks.

But I think you are missing the broader point: in all women, there is an underlying desire for masculine independence: a man’s ability to literally not care what other people think of him and to go after what he wants on his own initiative. Women see this quality in the selfish acts of aloof jerks and are attracted to it.

They can learn in time to distinguish between strong men and aloof jerk guys, but usually not early on. Those girls you know who are “marriage-minded” are, I’m afraid, denying a big part of their nature, seeking a sense of security, and once they have it, will get gamed by an aloof jerk during their marriages.

“Have you ever seen a guy you’ve recently hooked up with and waited an hour for him to start flirting with you?”

What the fuck! Shouldn’t flirting come before hooking up?!

“She’s admitting that women put up bitch shields to test men for their alpha worthiness, and that men who pass their shit tests are automatically deemed more viscerally attractive. I’m coming to the conclusion that 80% of early game, when attraction is being built, is basically passing a woman’s shit tests.”

Even if you passed all the shit tests, if your wingmen are of the kind who engages women in their shit, your results will be bad.

“In the end, there’s no clear way to stay away from guys who play these games. It seems the best we can do is hold our heads high, stay on our toes and sleep with one eye open.”

What the fuck does this bitch want?! You don’t make sense you filthy piece of shit.

This is biology, not morality. You’ll get wet when a guy is a jerk to you. It may be sutble negs, like the ones I toss at my wife daily, or full blown asshole, but either way your animal mind will want to grab his seed and coddle it like a Cabbage Patch Kid. No matter your mindset.

Case in point, my wife is outspoken, loud, proud, spiteful and acts like she had the pants, but she can’t be more extactic when my hand is lightly at her throat telling her to shut up because she’s talking too much. After that usually comes head and swallowing.

Haven’t read all the comments, but as my name implies I’m a recent college graduate from Texas. Tucker Max is known but only in that he wrote some books and got with a bunch of girls. Only a few people I can recall actually read his stuff. Game on the other hand is more widely known and talked about among guys. From what I’ve observed it’s mostly because of Mystery and The Pickup Artist show and The Game by Neil Strauss. However, few really dig into the stuff, and even fewer commit themselves to perfecting it.

As Roissy clearly demonstrates, such female behavior is clearly based on socio-biology. The fact that socio-biology so easily explains about 97% of all human behavior should make clear to anyone with a room temperature IQ and above that evolution is REAL and that those who believe in creationism are willfully delusional.

But asshole game…could that, should that, and how could it, apply in a LTR?

Google site search here: relationship game week. Read the week’s posts. (The two best posts were the one on “agree and amplify” and the one where Chateau compiled Dave from Hawaii’s best comments at this blog over the prior year on married game.)

Once you’re in a LTR you do dial asshole down a good bit, and ramp up comfort, supporting her. But never supplicating. Think of asshole game as the opposite of supplicating or chasing her or serving her game. Helping her yes, but you’re the leader, with her often your adviser and expert in particular areas. You’re her rock when she’s going batty emotionally, as virtually all girls do from time to time.

Thanks. UT’s got a lot of hot girls I hear. Well I dated a NYC stripper UT grad (who eventually went to law school after living with me for awhile post my divorce or actually separation at that point) who sure was.

I hate the whole. There are lots of nice girls out there that “game” won’t work on. I am a practicing Mormon and I assure you that game works really well on these girls. I see the nice guys getting ignored and I get the untouchable girls fighting to give me attention. Don’t say the big lie that it is just the sluts who respond to game.

He was an asshole to her AFTER he fucked her. When he had all the power. The harder task is to get attraction BEFORE you fuck her, and I don’t see how being aloof helps there. Most women will not make the first move.

I agree with the idea of the article but the first example isn’t something a guy is gonna get laid from (with that specific girl, not tube girl). ‘James Bond’ game doesn’t work; being cool and nonchalant. That comes after you engage her, when you invest less and she invests more.. The whole see-saw effect.

Doug
“Thanks. UT’s got a lot of hot girls I hear. Well I dated a NYC stripper UT grad (who eventually went to law school after living with me for awhile post my divorce or actually separation at that point) who sure was.”
–> You don’t have to try that hard to impress this group, my dear. Haha

“In the end, there’s no clear way to stay away from guys who play these games. It seems the best we can do is hold our heads high, stay on our toes and sleep with one eye open, gripping your pillow tight. Exit light. Enter night. Take my hand. We’re off to never never land.”

Back in my college days, I was a total deluded white-knighting good-two-shoes Christian who wouldn’t even kiss a chick, that’s how bad the brain washing was.

Guess what, after going back through the old memories with my new experience, I realize that roughly 3 – 4 chicks approached ME each semester (only to be driven off by the niceness). I kick myself about passing on the virgin blond 19yr old, who was in the 7-8 range for her age group.

Yeah, chicks do approach men, and yes, they do for sex.

While I haven’t been with many women, I can honestly say I’ve never dated one before fucking her. They seek it out. You just have to pay attention to which ones are looking for sex (all of the ones who will talk to strange men with any interest at all). Also, they will always always lie about their motives – even after you’ve had sex for the first time, they’ll tell you that wasn’t what they expected to happen.

Well, what did you expect would happen when you invited me over to your place to watch DvD’s and drink, and stuck your tit in my eyeball???

Getting women is like buying or selling, playing cards, etc. Never want something to the point you must have it. Always be willing to drop the deal and go someplace else if it’s not good enough.

And for TANSTAAFL’s sake, have some interests of your own that have nothing to do with women – have your own damn life. Chicks are not worth being the center of your being. If you must worship something, find a deity.

Call me hopeless, but I think the “asshole” type behavior of neglecting to show enthusiasm for a woman is appealing for a very romantic reason. And that is one of spiritual connection.

Over eagerness and “beta” behavior of treating a stranger whom he knows nothing of as worthy of being placed on a pedestal is counterproductive to the attainment of a more mature kind of love where a woman is appreciated with the full knowledge (and management) of her true nature-flaws and everything. It comes across as superficial and insincere.

The relationship with the overly doting man is a lonely road, because who- being human-would feel victorious in love if they were lauded for a mere projection of themselves?

Let me say that since moving to the United States, I’ve noticed that the men that have displayed vigorous enthusiasm towards me (persistent calling, being forceful in trying to coordination social activities) were the most emotionally unstable and immature ones.

Is this a common thing here? Perhaps my sample size is too small, but it is something that two of my fresh off the boat friends (both Eastern European) have noted as well. They only date other EEs within their circle of friends.

“Have you ever seen a guy you’ve recently hooked up with and waited an hour for him to start flirting with you?”

Always grosses me out to see women talk about sex like it’s a handshake.

Not only do ‘chicks dig assholes’ they – the ones like the girl who wrote this piece anyway – also seem to allow their merest and basest physiological responses to actually dictate their relationships (I almost said “lovelife” – heh).

Just like dogs. Who, by the way, are also quite fond of assholes.

Now, I would not defend modern ‘beta’ behaviour: niceness and attention are usually just hiding places for insecurity and distrust. But if a woman wants to have a relationship with anything more meaningful than the dating equivalent of the “take-away sale” then she should perhaps figure out the difference between a craving and a feeling of love.

When she is in the supermarket does she run around opening up all the candy bars and stuffing them in her mouth? When she has to go, does she poop her pants instead of taking the time to find a toilet?

The funny thing is it is the psychological equivalent of a porn-addicted beta male… the only difference being that she uses real penises to masturbate. Most people seem to think the latter is obviously pathetic while the former is laudable, empowering.

Anyway, I don’t think she can necessarily be blamed per se, because it’s really the fault of gender-neutral socialization ‘masculinizing’ females and feminising men, decreasing the role of eros (to borrow greek terms) and having people have to rely on philia (then wonder why they get bored).

your daughter shall have the right 2 be assocked by thugmen of her choosing

men whose ancsetsors wrote greats books and classics of freedom shall be deemed guilty in any altercations and jailed lzozllzlzl

any attempt to discipline a girl who has a right to her own body and can let in any thugcocks as she siwshes will be a felony resulting in incacertaion

any attempt to impose deceny or standadrths on a owman above and beyond butthex will be riducled and castigated and impguned

the purpose of a man is to pay 4 thugchildren as teh fed grows the underclass and erodes freeedom

all men must pay for thugoffspring either by being cuckolded by tehri wives or cuckolded by a government which forces men to pay for chiclden that are not theirsz lozlzozzlllo

henceofrth only men who cooperate in secrteiv tapings of butthex and the fed’s deosuling progams wwill be wired fiat bernankecahs from powrful womenz ecxucitives lzozlzo

men sho suggets their are highter entiteis than getting it or putting it up the butt are to be exiled and defunded and denied bernankecash as tehir assetts are seized and given to the douchebagslututopia brave new neocon world lzozlzozlzlzllzlzlzlz

women get turned on by these types of men because in the fevered downtime the women muse that his unavailability is caused by other women occupying his time.

This may be a partial answer, but it is not entirely correct. The principal reason, I believe, is that at a deeply subconscious level, women have an unshakeable but invisible awareness of their low self-esteem – irrespective of whether they’re a 1 or a 10. Because the provided-for sex has it so easy, they never experience the sorts of challenges that routinely test men. And so they cannot develop the same sort of confidence as men. They cannot avoid the subconscious, instinctive deference to men with the sort of confidence that must necessarily be denied to the provided-for sex.

Call me hopeless, but I think the “asshole” type behavior of neglecting to show enthusiasm for a woman is appealing for a very romantic reason. And that is one of spiritual connection.

lozozlzzloozllz yes womenz prefer secrtiev tpaers of butthex without teh gilrths contehnt over true real ruggen medn they just want assckconing asscoicckinsg lotsa asscockisng lzozlzozlzozlz a sore anuth and caths but no hudsnabnmd and den they get bernanke to fund teh growth fo the government to pay tofr their butthex spawn lzozozlzllz

Over eagerness and “beta” behavior of treating a stranger whom he knows nothing of as worthy of being placed on a pedestal is counterproductive to the attainment of a more mature kind of love where a woman is appreciated with the full knowledge (and management) of her true nature-flaws and everything. It comes across as superficial and insincere.

But your “lust projection” won’t work in both cases.
In the first case, you’ll not pass the first battery of shit tests, in the second, you may scare the girl. Project lust (or the tool of it) as you please after you close. But before, it will get you nowhere, with exception of rare outliers.

Work with the material that has properties and behaves certain ways that are explained in CR and supported by a shitload of evidence, not what you think how it should behave.

Just go out and try the indifferent/aloof approach and the lustful one and see where each one gets you.

So women dig jerks? So what! Men don’t want fuglies. It’s the same thing. Of course, women want a Man not a sissy boy who happens to be over the age of 18. Of course a woman wants her sons to be Alpha Men who grew up being respected not autustic Om3ga tards who got harassed every day at school. Likewise guys wants a healthy beatiful woman so their offspring have the best odds of good-looking healthy children. Naturally, most Betas accept their second-rate status and make Beta children. Likewise Om3gas dont’ need be sterilised because no one want to have sex with them.

Oh, Come ON
It is not what Xsplat wants. In order to have choices you have have something in you and Xsplat does not seem to have some of them. If you go to his description of personality you would be surprised if any chick would be interested in him. Beggars cannot be choosers. Meanwhile ending up for third class choice for a mate can work for some satisfaction.

how right you are. Xsplat is one such jerk for who girls fall and that is what he is conveying through his submissions. Guess what by showing that he has girls in his will does not mean that he is Alfa…it simply mean even jerks can get girls.

As Roissy has admitted earlier at numerous instances Asians do not have fair chances of becoming Alfa why such people are trying for they should not do what they cannot do. Knowing limitations is the best possible trick to survive.

Ok, ok… wow. Just had to comment on this one for the ladies. Ms. Dickens mentions in her first few sentences the hypothetical situation in which a woman at a bar spots a guy… but wait! Just any guy? NO. A guy whom she has “recently hooked up with.” The guy in question then proceeds to ignore her which serves to further ignite her passion for him. Ok. I get it. In fact, in a more pathetic/crazy/psycho/whatever-you-wanna-call-it stage of my life, I have been that girl! It sucks. A lot. I can’t even describe how painful and infuriating that situation is! On some level, you do know the guy is being an asshole, but for some reason you can’t help but crave him even more! SUCKS SUCKS SUCKS SUCKS SUCKS!!!!!

So ladies… is there a solution? How about DON’T “HOOK UP”! It’s very simple actually. If you just don’t “hook up” with guys whom you don’t know very well (i.e. guys who aren’t your BOYFRIEND, whom you aren’t DATING, or whom you’re not even sure will say HI when you run into them at a BAR) then this situation WILL NOT HAPPEN. Even if a similar situation does occur (i.e. you spot “a guy you recently met and thought was cute but didn’t jump into bed with right away”) the feelings of rejection will not be nearly as acute, and YOU WILL GET OVER THE ASSHOLE VERY SOON.

And as for Roissy and other members of the “Chateau” that claim to want a relatively virginal girl who has not ridden the “cock carousal”…. well THAT girl has and NEVER will have the experience of spotting YOU across the bar after she’s recently hooked up with you because… yeah you guessed it: SHE NEVER HOOKED UP WITH YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE.

“Over eagerness and “beta” behavior of treating a stranger whom he knows nothing of as worthy of being placed on a pedestal is counterproductive to the attainment of a more mature kind of love where a woman is appreciated with the full knowledge (and management) of her true nature-flaws and everything. It comes across as superficial and insincere.”

you have got reasoning screwed up. the pedestalization makes sex boring. nothing to do with “mature” love, or women’s flaws; if the cocka worked well enough(and for it to work well enough the woman has to screw herself in the head), woman will herself try to hide her flaws.
or rise above her flaws, if you want me to puke.

“The relationship with the overly doting man is a lonely road, because who- being human-would feel victorious in love if they were lauded for a mere projection of themselves?”

projection of themselves or projection of the one loving them? it’s amusing watching what men love and what women love, the contrast in their projections.

Morselleax, I’m not following your question, and I don’t understand your assumptions. I am currently doing fine, dating, and have a long history of doing fine. My methods are proven, and currently working.

xsplat
Also, I rarely have one night stands, because the girls always come back for more.

I once copped a freebee off of a prostitute//

Visiting prostitutes is definitely a Beta character. Moreover, prostitutes are so common in South East Asia where even males are yearning to become female through sex change so that can cash on the market. Any way Xsplat seems to sex starved who even does not leave trannys..

All sadly true. Females are the generators of virtually all of their own unhappiness. Then they turn around and blame everyone but themselves. (ex: how much do you want to bit this chick, and the millions like her, will fall for one of the assholes, turn crazy and bunny-boiling, then blame… him, for the same behavior that drew her in to begin with.)

Loved the Triumph reference at the end. I haven’t seen Conan’s new show (is it even on yet?) but I hope Triumph comes back.

The blog can be revived if people stop harping on their lays which in fact they are just assuming or wishing them to be true. People like Xsplat should be banned for their false self-admiration and imposed prowess of being serial dating guy.

If some truth seems untrue it is a fallacy and people living in false premises are bound to fall down. Xsplat admitting of visiting prostitutes shows that he is not in demand in dating market then how can he claim he is laid every now and then – self-contradictory statements on his part shows that something is inherently false.

oh, come on , paying for sex cannot be appreciated. damn it if you pay for it. It shows you are damn lame that cannot even get a fugly Indonesian or Philipeno. Come to Pattaya you will have plenty of them or contact Xsplat, he may assist you in such a act. You are lousy mr. gun…

View it differently, if you are in demand you get fuck every time and when you are not you visit prostitutes. And, if your analogy is true that would mean those who visit prostitutes for fuck they would get fuck from ordinary women but that is not true. Test your acumen among ordinary girls and do not be a handicapped to buy sex for dollars!!

Talking something sensible is not for morons. Virgin or not virgin is out of context. The fact in issue is whether you are able to catch a fish or wishing to buy fish from fish market. If you buy it from fish market you are incapable dumb ass harping to have done something great buying fish.

There are plenty of women who are eager for ‘no strings attached’ relationship, ONS. But, ya these are available only for hot guys who are ‘In’ and not for those who are in habit of buying sex from hookers. Loss is yours..financially and physically….you pay to hookers and get STDs…

Lawyerjourno, I’m with you on this one, but you’ve got to understand that you’re at cross purposes with your interlocutor here. In other words, the two of you have totally different value systems, so it’s rather pointless to have the argument that you’re having.

Here’s what I mean:
There’s a spectrum.
On one end of the spectrum are people like me, who *hate* parting with resources, and hate feeling suckered or played in any way (even if it was actually a fair deal). For instance, if I was driving around in a Ferrari that I bought for full price, I would still feel like a chump — because I’d paid full price. Wouldn’t matter that it was a Ferrari.
On the other end of the spectrum are people who make money SOLELY for the purpose of spending it as conspicuously as possible. These are the guys who don’t even care about the Ferrari itself, but just want to spend their money as loudly and publicly as possible, and/or just want to have enough money to throw at the Ferrari without having to give a shit how much it costs.

For people like me — and, I suspect, you — yeah, prostitution is stupid and repulsive. Even if I paid $5 for sex with the world’s hottest pornstar, I would still feel like a sucker and a mark, for having to pay for something I’m used to getting for free.
For these other guys, the whole point of money is to throw it around at things — including pussy — without having to care.
Not an issue of right and wrong. An issue of values systems.
I would feel like the biggest loser in the world if I explicitly traded cash for sex, because I would feel (a) hustled/cheated and (b) as though I had absolutely nothing else to offer. But I don’t extend that to thinking that every john is a loser, because I’m not stupidly self-centered enough to project my own value system onto everyone else in the world.

For sure I am not for moral aspect of visiting prostitute; rather, it is for paying for sex. Can you boast that you fucked a whore, I guess you cannot whether you bought her for one million dollar or for five dollar. And, what Roissy says is buying sex is Beta!!

”””For people like me — and, I suspect, you — yeah, prostitution is stupid and repulsive. Even if I paid $5 for sex with the world’s hottest pornstar, I would still feel like a sucker and a mark, for having to pay for something I’m used to getting for free.
””””

It is actually win/win for the woman and me if I don’t want a relationship and I fuck hookers I don’t have to hurt any regular chicks feelings.

See, like I said, different value systems. I can appreciate the way you think about this, even though it’s different from the way I think about it.

The problem is this, though — isn’t sex with hookers bad?

I mean, after you’ve had enough sex, you get to a point where sex that isn’t infused with some kind of emotion, where the girl isn’t into it, just gets really fucking boring. Like, so boring that I’d rather lie in bed and stare at the ceiling, with slightly relaxed eyes so that the ceiling starts to go blurry.

I can only imagine that sex with a hooker, who obviously isn’t going to be into you with all the trappings of being into you — mind-blowing orgasms, dilated eyes, passionate kisses, that irreplaceable look of love in her eyes, etc. — would just suck.
It’d be beyond boring.
To the point where it would be absolutely not even an option for any man who’s ever fucked a woman who truly loves him.

That is the point for guys having touble picking up there is more than one way of doing things and if whores are better than most chicks you will ever fuck then yea why not.
There is a reason you are supposed to look down on it you might like it.

Ok, so I get it like this….a guy has so much desire for sex that when he does not get quantum of sex from chicks he visits brothels…or is it other way round if some guy cannot quench his thirst for sex from brothels goes to chicks…

Putting it differently it is about the need of body that you visit whores and chicks. That is fine then, you made things quite understandable.

The fact that socio-biology so easily explains about 97% of all human behavior should make clear to anyone with a room temperature IQ and above that evolution is REAL and that those who believe in creationism are willfully delusional.

Not really. I listened to a talk on male/female roles by a traditional Catholic priest, and he came to many of the same conclusions that HBD and evo-psyche folks do, but he traced their explanation to the Fall of Adam and Eve.

To be successful with women, you have to know how human behavior works (or have a ‘natural’ grasp of it). Whether it works that way because of evolution or God or alien viruses is irrelevant.

I can double stack a couple ‘ten’s’ in an fkk for about a hundred euro if I’m quick, two hundred if I’m longer than a half an hour. Clean, legal, no strings attached, no pyscho bullshit baggage. No amount of game in real life is ever going to allow me to do the same on command. I suppose there’s a certain age where a guy just says fuck it, I’m rich, I’m lazy and I have no morals, and the choice becomes really obvious. David Beckham could triple stack tens on command with just his fame alone, yet his most recent scandal pretty much proves that there’s another element to pay to play that the ‘prostitutes are for betas’ crowd just doesn’t get. Most of Tiger’s bitches were also p2p. Silvio B. fucks escorts like no PUA could ever get for free. Howard Hughes had his bungalow girls. Most managers openly admit that rockstar ‘groupies’ are hired ‘pros’. Robert De Niro to Franck Ribery to Francois Mitterand-who hasn’t fucked a hot french prostitute? I’d say most betas haven’t.

The “exposure” of Beckham is a piece of opportunistic drivel, a speculative leap aboard the fast-rolling media bandwagon. But it still throws up one important question: why do so many sportsmen, young lads with the heady benefits of money, looks, vitality and renown, even consider the need to hire a hooker? They are men lusted after by at least half the women on the planet, surely they wouldn’t need to pay for it?

The answer is a simple one. In the other-worldly moral order which our top sportsmen inhabit, it has been received wisdom that if he wants to go off-piste, there is less risk involved in engaging a professional than in picking up a random groupie.

I can tell that no one here actually has any significant experience with prostitutes, at least not the strolling type. The way I can tell is, no one has remarked on a remarkably consistent attribute of the street ho: she has no pussy scent. I’ve “dated” about 250 hookers and not one, ever, had any hint of musk at all. Since for many men one of the best parts of unpaid sex is the musk of girljuice, at least someone would have mentioned this if they really knew anything. Now, we can speculate about reasons for this, but the bottom line, especially you guys who enjoy sniffing panties, is that you will never get off on that with a pro. And by the way, lest anyone here think that alphas don’t enjoy that scent, I direct you to Richard Stark’s (Donald Westlake) famous character Parker, the master thief and tough guy. In one novel, he’s injured after a shootout in which one of his associates is killed. He lays up in the apartment of the dead guy’s girlfriend, a stacked blonde. In the morning she gets up to shower, leaving her panties behind in the bed, which he then leisurely sniffs. The toughest guy in hardcase crime, and he digs cuntgas.

Having known a prostitute for a while, she tells me that her clients are largely alpha male personality types. They are people who are successful at what they do, independent minded, not risk averse and are people who commit to life, rather than dream about it. They are morally pragmatic and view a brief sexual connection with an escort as a way of avoiding , if married, the real cancer of an emotional infidelity.

I love traveling to Thailand and fucking endless streams of 9’s and 10’s and just because the sex isn’t “legitimate” doesn’t mean that it’s a beta thing to do. It’s all part of life’s rich experience.

Passage that stands out for me in relation to why game is necessary and why it works:

“”Don’t be embarrassed if that’s a yes. We’re aroused by the unpredictability of waiting for a guy to strike up a conversation with us, and the longer it takes, the more rewarded we feel when it actually happens.””

Until discovering game, it was all hit and miss. But the more I practice it and see results, the more predictable female behaviour becomes.

The more predictable female behaviour becomes, the more comments like this serve as reassurance that making an approach–even if at first it’s resisted, is a display of confidence and alpha behaviour.

How many times here in Hong Kong have I seen guys sucking up, pedestalizing or otherwise bowing, defering to women only to see the woman’s predictable reaction—she begins treating the guy like her brother.

The other key learning or indicator to me is when the shit tests start, then you know you’re making progress.

I recently gamed and f-closed hot girl in city I was away on business for.

The next time we met up, suddenly she was shit-testing me. The most common question: “How many girls you been dating since we last me?” This is a common insecure Asian-girl question.

My response is either to come up with some ridiculously high number or something that closely resembles a realistic number with the following rejoinder.

[…] No one claimed alpha males had to be admirable (though personally I find much to admire about Sheen). The alpha male and the admirable man may often be the same, but not always. Women, saddled as their emotionally stunted gender is with an underdeveloped sense of justice and fairness, swoon for the alpha male, whether or not he is admirable. Sure, women will talk a big talk about the fine traits of admirable men, but when pussy comes to tingle, it’s double alpha all the way. […]

“All girls, single or not, love assholes.” Married girls will just be more work to get into bed, if you’re the sort who’s inclined to pursue that. A married woman will flirt with an asshole, enjoy the attention from him, and get just as excited if not more than a single girl will. Because he’s providing the validation and sexual frisson she most likely isn’t getting regularly from comfortable boring hubby at home.

That doesn’t necessarily mean she’ll sleep with you, but it’s easy to make a married woman’s day with a little well-placed flirting.

[…] No one claimed alpha males had to be admirable (though personally I find much to admire about Sheen). The alpha male and the admirable man may often be the same, but not always. Women, saddled as their emotionally stunted gender is with an underdeveloped sense of justice and fairness, swoon for the alpha male, whether or not he is admirable. Sure, women will talk a big talk about the fine traits of admirable men, but when pussy comes to tingle, it’s double alpha all the way. […]