Hi Bob! Is your name Bob? Well it is now, Bob. Anyways, this post is not so much directed at you Bob, as it is towards Bill, the guy in the "And
that sucks" video, which I did find both entertaining, and enlightening. Thanks Bob.

Dear Bill Whittle,
A standard for good behavior exists, you say? And, that sucks more than anything you say? Standing on your conservative soapbox and spewing
anti-progressive rhetoric and at times bombastic hokum to an assumed linear thinking target audience. However, some of us are not exactly what some
would consider to be your average
ovis aries.

I once saw this cartoon, it may have been a farside cartoon, but it was relevant to what I believe is truly transpiring behind the scenes of our
social engineering political two party system construct called government. In this cartoon there are a flock of sheep, a shepard, and a sheep dog.
One of the sheep looks to another sheep and says: "I'm not sure, but I think the man and the dog are working together."

Anyways Mr. Bill Whittle, on to your statement concerning "standards for good behavior exist". They aren't so much standards Bill, as they are
mandatory expectations that all citizens must adhere to and conform with.

3) America's current model of government exists BECAUSE: Hundreds of years ago it took weeks, months, and even years to get information from point A
to point B. Hence we had a central government with senators and representatives that spent part of their year with their constituents, and keeping in
touch with their needs and issues, and the rest of the year in DC. AND THAT SUCKS

So who plans on voting so we can pay these people to make more laws and pay them for it with money we can not afford?

Do you know the number of laws that exist?
Does your favorite candidate know the number of laws that exist?

If we locked all the current law makers up in a big nice plush resort and did not let them out until they collectively wrote down all the existing
laws word for word from memory, do you honestly believe they would live long enough to complete the task?

Only fools vote for more lawmakers. AND THAT SUCKS

Or maybe I'm just venting my current level of mistrust and frustration.

Oh, it was Clinton? He was the one?
What are you talking about anyway? Lying? Who gives a # about lying about who he slept with? Hell, my example included law breaking. You are worried
about unseating a president over a lie about his sex life. Tell me about small government again.

Heck, Kennedy stayed in office for many more years despite killing someone when he was drunk.
Now... What were you saying?

edit on 18-2-2012 by sickofitall2012 because: (no reason given)

Oh you want to trade list for list?
Better stop before I make you cry.
Your list will be full of Democrats who had sex with women not their wives.
My list will be full of Republicans who were #ing the boy that carried their luggage to religious retreats and were looking to give anonymous blowjobs
in public restrooms.

Really want to do this?

I have a text message from a Republican to a 16 year old boy about his underwear to top it off with.

I see all "Isms" as being the problem. I'm not a conservative, however, Obama and this intrusive NWO left political style, that is left in terms of
control, but right winged in terms of services, IS NOT EQUALITY.

People need to withdraw from all the programming and start to see what other options exist for freedoms, and intrinsic substantive equality, and how
groups of citizens could watchdog and transform things, and always give a voice to everyone, ie. the homeless. And start to flex muscles by
effectiveness. To me the effectiveness of community councils for equality and peace would be to get some land donations and start building small but
attractive homes of the homeless, gardens, etc, and change any land uses needed with city councils.

People would educating their own areas on GMO, on energy creation, on creating businesses for the poor and even those with jobs so we don't have to
buy from corruption, and basically a real empowerment.

Should have already been done.

I don't even believe in the political system, but toppling all programming, lots of compassion and sovereignity, councils of citizens, half women
and half men, public involvement taught to all people.

American Liberal :I do not care who your god is, just do not shove him in my face.
American Conservative :I do not care who your god is, as long as my god is on your money, in your laws, and you show him some #ing respect!

American Liberal :I want to be able to have sex with or marry whatever consenting adult that chooses to go with me.
American Conservative :I want to know if you are gay, have oral sex, use contraceptives, have anal sex, have sex for fun, and I am going to write lots
of laws regarding such as well as pay for them to be enforced.

seriously though, the conservative/liberal dichotomy is not a true dichotomy. most points on which they differ are completely inane, such as abortion,
religion, sexuality, etc., and with points that actually matter, they only differ in their rhetoric but their actual policies are identical. Obama's
signing of the NDAA was no different from Bush's signing of the Patriot Act. Obama's tax policies, in reality, have very little variation from
Bush's tax policies. his military policies have done little to change the dynamic of the wars we are involved in with other countries and have
actually intensified the war in Iraq in addition to getting involved in additional wars that the Bush administration only dreamed about. he has done
nothing to get us out of Guantanamo Bay, to improve the US prison system, etc.

republicrats need a reality check. conservatives don't suck because they have to maintain reality. they suck because conservative politicians
endlessly lie and cheat the people and the conservative voters actually fall for it.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.