Follow The Discreet Traveler by e-mail!

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Author's note: Although this blog is about my travels, living outside the U.S. since 2000 means being asked about that country and its president. More often than I would like. So I've chosen this forum to share thoughts.

Dear Mrs. Clinton,

I know you sign your e-mails to me
"Hillary" but we both know those aren't really written by you, so
please accept the formality. The way things have been going in this election
campaign, to err on the side of respect is no vice.

I'm on Bernie Sanders's e-mail list too. In fact, I
voted for him during the primary. I mention that now because I want you to know
where I'm coming from. I have not been an uncritical fan of yours, but I listen
to what you have to say, and I feel that I gave you a fair chance.

I'm not one of those young student voters, but I was
the first time I saw you, with your husband in New Hampshire in 1992. He was
running for president, and I hadn't heard of you before you were First Lady of
Arkansas. I have to say, I didn't warm to either you or Mr. Clinton at first.
But, by the time the general election rolled around I was glad to vote for him,
and I remember you trying hard to accomplish something on health care during
his administration. It failed--tragically--and part of me thought then that
both of you should have gone down fighting for the most important thing we
elected him for.

But, the 1990s were a different time. The number of jobs increased, and
the markets were going up and up and up--it's no wonder Mr. Clinton made
some of the decisions he did about welfare and trade deals. A lot of Americans
were more optimistic in those days. And I certainly would never excoriate you,
as opposed to your husband, for things he did wrong in your personal life.
Public humiliation in front of the entire world is a high enough price to pay.

We've been through a lot since 2000--you, and I, and America. I left the country for reasons that did
not change until the Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsora couple years ago. By that time, I'd long since become a
Canadian and made a life for myself somewhere else. But I wasn't one of those
people who claim they're going to run away to Canada if someone gets elected
they don't like. I still have a stake in America, as do other Canadians and, in
fact, the rest of the world.

One of your most disarming moments
in this long campaign was when you said, in the Univision debate, "I am
not a natural politician, in case you haven.'t noticed, like my husband or President Obama." I felt for you then, Mrs. Clinton, because it made you
human to me. So often, your answers are so measured and careful, and believe
me, I understand why that is. The "vast right-wing conspiracy" may
not have been to blame for your husband's problems, but people certainly have had
it in for you. You've learned from long experience to weigh your words
carefully whenever you open your mouth, and you know that issues are usually
more nuanced and complex than simply "yes" or "no."

The problem is that right now, we are in a place that we have never been before. You went into the
2008 campaign (when I voted for you, by the way) with the same broad economic and policy views shared by Mr. Clinton, Mr. Obama, and indeed Republican
presidents before you. Up until 2008, I guess they still made sense, especially
in the world in which you move. The problem is that a lot has gone down since
then and a lot of people are hurting in a way that you may not have been aware
of.

Some of them, no doubt, have the
kind of racial resentment that your Republican opponent
has proven so adept at stirring up. But others do not. That's why you had
such a hard time putting away your surprising opponent for the Democratic
nomination--an independent senator whose state, age, and self-described
socialist views the media never get tired of making fun of. They have been on
your side from Day One (remember that expression from eight years ago?) yet they
haven't completely been able to crush coverage of, and enthusiasm for, Mr. Sanders. In my opinion, he has been good for the Democratic party--even, dare I
say it, good for you. He has forced you and the rest of the
Democrats to deal with a bunch of issues that were not important during Mr.
Clinton's presidency, but are very important to many Americans today,
especially those who don't have the memories of the 1990s that you and I have.

You may not be a natural politician,
Mrs. Clinton, but you know what we are all up against is not the usual
four-yearly opponent. I didn't want Mitt Romney or John McCain to be president, but
they were honorable men, with whom you could disagree in what was once called
civil discourse. Heaven knows what's happened to John McCain now, but you remember that after Mr. Obama had gotten the
nomination in 2008 and was starting to get hit with the lies and disrespect that have plagued
his administration, Mr. McCain spoke up for that civil discourse and his own
honorable opponent. "He's a decent person...no, ma'am, he's a decent family man and citizen."

Now, however, we have Mr. Trump. You know him--personally--and you also know that he has found a way to tap that
racial resentment, that hurt. By saying just enough truth to
convince people (never more), Mr. Trump has won voters to his
side. You have got to win more voters, in more states, than he does.

Of course you know this is your
task. And many of your supporters--opponents, even--may think this is a good
position to be in, that you can't flub it up. With the greatest respect, Mrs.
Clinton, I think that you can. I don't, God forbid, think that you will,
but we must all recognize the possibility of failure. If we don't, failure will
come to you.

Hence, my unsolicited advice to you,
as a voter, not an expert of any kind. I like you, Mrs.
Clinton. I won't say I've always supported you, and goodness knows you've
driven me up the wall plenty of times, but we are on the same side. So are most
Democratic voters, regardless of whom they voted for in the primaries. So are a lot of Republicans. In fact you probably would rather
disclaim some of the people who've supported you, but as a woman called out to Adlai Stevenson in the apocryphal campaign story,
"Senator, you have the vote of every thinking person!"

1. Say it like you mean it. I know
you've gotten better at this, but my gosh, sometimes I still cringe. We know Benghazi
is a made-up scandal. We know you testified for eleven hours
and Congress got nothing on you. So when Jorge Ramos asks did you lie, please
start your answer with No. Then you can explain the
context and express your feelings for the Benghazi families.When asked if you
lie--and when given the opportunity to lie--ever, just say no.

Does that remind you of Nancy Reagan? Sorry to bring that up again. I know you apologized
and, while I don't feel entitled to accept your apology on behalf of all gay
people, I get that you misspoke. To paraphrase a friend of mine, I'm guessing that when asked to
say something nice about the Reagans, you may have panicked a little bit. In
the same circumstances, I'd probably have to make something up too.

2. Don't take
your voters for granted. You've already figured out that
African-Americans don't owe you their vote just because you're named Clinton.
Queers don't owe you their vote just because you're a Democrat. Yes, I said queer.
Get used to it, as we said before your husband was president (the first we'd
ever had who could pronounce the words gay and lesbian). We've
all come a long way from Little Rock, Mrs. Clinton. Don't blow it.

This is not a Republican opponent,
Mrs. Clinton. This is an opponent of the republic itself.

Like it or hate it, the President of
the United States is both our head of government and the head of state of our
country. He represents it to us and to the world, like the Queen. The position
you are in, Mrs. Clinton, is that you have to represent the country before
you are even elected to the office. You have to start acting like our president
right now.

Not that many voters care what the
rest of the world thinks, but we are horrified by what America has become even
before the election. People who normally take minimal interest in politics find
it hard to believe that someone so obviously (to a European) a right-wing nationalist is in
danger of becoming the President of the United States. Living outside America,
Mrs. Clinton, I am asked every day about Mr. Trump and what will happen if he
gets where he wants to go.

This is not just about Supreme
Court nominations, or same-sex marriage, or Obama-/Hillary-/Romneycare. As
important as those and many other issues are, there is really only one issue in
2016. Is the U.S.A. going to continue to be the republic for which the flag stands,
"one nation," or is it going to fracture into something else?

I mentioned the 1960s before, but I think something even greater than the 1960s is at hand. Try the
1860s. This country is in danger of splitting as it did during the Civil War, and along the same lines. You have never claimed to be Abraham Lincoln, Mrs. Clinton, but right now the best the party of Lincoln has come up
with is your opponent, Mr. Trump. If President Lincoln were here, he would no doubt be
surprised to see a "little lady" running to be his successor. But I
believe if he, or any responsible Republican or Democrat of the past, thought
that the alternative was a vulgar misogynist who whips crowds into a fury with
the rhetoric of hate groups, Mr. Lincoln would vote for you.

Our opponents will laugh us to
scorn. Hillary Clinton! We've never liked her! I know that hurts your feelings; as you reminded us, you're a human being too. I'm not saying you're Lincoln. But you are--forgive me--the little Dutch boy whose finger is plugging
this particular dike, and if you can't get it done, we're all going to be under
water for a long time to come.

We are the U.S. citizens whom you
said you would always support, whether we supported you or not. We
are people who never imagined America could elect a woman president, and people
who weren't sure that you were that woman. We are registered in different parties and
we are independents. We live in many countries and look to see what the United
States will do. We all know who Hillary Clinton is, that you visited more countries than any other Secretary of State, that you were in the Situation Room when they went for Osama bin Laden--all of that. Millions and millions of us are hoping, even praying, that you rise above your human weaknesses and get this done for us.

You are a Christian and talk about
praying daily, but I've never heard anyone say of you that you're
anointed by God to seek and obtain the presidency. For all that, I believe this
is your moment. I very much doubt that you would have chosen these exact
circumstances and no one is more surprised than I that we are in them, but here
we are.

If I may conclude with an anecdote you may know from British history. Before World War II, Arthur Greenwood
became the deputy leader of the opposition Labour Party under Clement Attlee. On the 2nd of September 1939, acting for an absent Attlee, he was
called to respond to Conservative Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's ambivalent speech on whether Britain would aid Poland. He was interrupted by an angry Conservative backbencher, Leo Amery, who exclaimed "Speak for England, Arthur!" Arthur Greenwood proceeded to give the speech of his life, denouncing Mr. Chamberlain's appeasement and beginning the unification of Britain against the greatest enemy the Allies ever faced.

My author Web site

About Me

Walking the line between discretion and paranoia, I am always writing and travel as much as I can. My first novel, Arusha, was a Lambda Literary Award Finalist. My second novel is The Trees in the Field.