Wearing the garb of the shaheed and giving out qurans on the morning of his jihad, this devout Muslim slaughtered our soldiers in the mess hall of Fort Hood in Texas. The Obama administration refused to classify it as terror (if that isn't Islamic terror, then what is?). Hasan claimed allegiance to the Taliban and said repeatedly that he had attacked America in the cause of Islam.

Instead, the slaughterer was given royal treatment. We are losing the war and this is why.

Galligan believes many of the things the government did in the name of security were an excessive use of taxpayer money, including the nearly $200,000 spent on daily helicopter rides to ferry Hasan from the jail to Fort Hood.

The Army also spent tens of thousands of dollars setting up a private Fort Hood office for Hasan, who insisted on representing himself at trial, where he could prepare his own defense.

Records obtained by NBC 5 Investigates show nearly $5 million dollars in expenses, millions in travel for government lawyers, fees paid to expert witnesses, vehicles and cell phones purchased and major security renovations at the base.

Aside from the widely reported demands to know where his cheese was coming from, (it proved to be Baccio mozzarella… made with “a kiss of buffalo milk”) and repeatedly demanded a clock and wanted to keep his cell at exactly 70 degrees.

Hasan repeatedly complained that he wasn’t notified so that he could turn over every two hours and there were constant issues with his bowel movements, with the crippled Palestinian Muslim terrorist apparently refusing to use the toilet and using a trash can instead.

The back and forth exchanges between Nidal Hasan and the prison reveal growing exasperation by the prison staff with the privileged terrorist.

Hasan’s repeated demands for temperature regulation is turned down after medical staff state that it’s not a legitimate issue. Hasan’s request for an Imam is turned down as he is told that the prison is not obligated to provide him with an Imam, only to allow one to see him if he wants to.

In one message, Nidal Hasan demands that “defecated material” be removed, only to be told curtly, “I request that you properly evacuate your bowel… you know how to do it properly and after 19 days… do what you are supposed to do Major Hasan.”

Another response angrily tells the Muslim serial killer, “This was not an issue for you in the first two weeks of your incarceration when you were conducting your bowel movements as you were instructed.”

Finally Hasan is told, “You are not going to use a garbage can in the jail. Do as you were instructed, you’re a grown man, act like it.”

In another message, he is told, “Being given instructions to make your bed or change your linens is nowhere near a threat, it is an order from your doctor. You need to follow orders, Major.”

I imagine this probably was not the martyrdom afterlife that the self-proclaimed Soldier of Allah was expecting where 72 virgins and young boys would wait on his every wish.

With little to occupy his time, Hasan continues escalating his demands while the prison staff make it obvious that they are sick of dealing with the Muslim mass murderer.

“Good morning. I would just like reiterate that warming up the cell before taking a temperature of 74 is not a good way to take the avg temperature. I would request a thermometer (or equivalent) to take the avg temp throughout the day, ” Hasan writes.

The prison’s response. “This is not taking place, Hasan.” It sounds even better if you say it in a Schwarzenegger accent.

Hasan also claimed that his “privileged” files were being read, even though his defense consisted of claiming allegiance to the Taliban and rejecting the United States Constitution.

The latest issue of the English-language jihadi magazine Azan, which is published by the Taliban in Khurasan (Afghanistan-Pakistan region), carries several articles urging Muslim youth in the West to launch attacks in their homelands, and pays tribute to Maj. Nidal Hasan, the U.S. army officer who was convicted of a jihadi attack at Fort Hood in November 2009.

The magazine, the fourth issue since it began publishing early this year, was released through a jihadi website. An article titled 'Nidal Hassan [sic] – Our Hero', written by Muhammad Qasim, carries the following words along with his photo: 'The courageous mujahid Nidal Hassan… was sentenced to death by a military jury in late August.

What utter nonsense. Show me a soldier who is "under pressure" from a divorce or some such and opens fire on his brothers. This elaborate jihad cover-up scheme is lethal.

How is the military advising soldiers to spot jihadists in their midst? The fact is if a soldier reports a devout Muslim soldier that may very well go jihad, he will be labeled a racist-islamophobic-anti-Muslim-bigot. What are the authorities doing about that?

Why, for example, was nothing done after Major Hasan gave this lecture in the "workplace?" Because the people who worried about Hasan going jihad were afraid of being called an islamophobe or a racist (another adoption of the Islamic supremacist narrative -- Islam is not a race. Nidal Hasan was not a black man).

Special agents at the Naval Criminal Investigative Service want you to consider this scenario:

A
gunny in your unit is going through a divorce. He’s going to lose his
kids, the alimony bill is coming and these stressors in his personal
life are starting to spill over to work. It’s clear to you his anger is
building up, he’s acting out of character, and he’s taking things out on
his Marines. You think his anger could lead to violence. What do you
do?

“Step up and report it,” said Kate Shields, a supervisory
special agent for the National Security Directorate at NCIS. “It is your
responsibility to help protect your workforce, protect your colleagues
and protect your country. It’s easy to look the other way. It takes an
incredible amount of courage and commitment to actually step up and tell
somebody you’re concerned.”

Throughout this month, NCIS is
conducting field briefings for Marines and sailors about what they can
do to prevent workplace violence.

The Army psychiatrist sentenced to death for the Fort Hood
shooting rampage has been forcibly shaved, an Army spokesman said
Tuesday.

Maj. Nidal Hasan began growing a beard in the years after the
November 2009 shooting that left 13 dead and 30 wounded. The beard
prompted delays to his court-martial because it violated Army grooming
regulations. He was convicted of all charges last month at his
court-martial at the Central Texas Army post and sentenced to death.

Now, Hasan is an inmate at the U.S. Detention Barracks at Fort
Leavenworth, Kan., home to the military death row. Lt. Col. S. Justin
Platt, an Army spokesman, said in a statement Tuesday that Hasan had
been shaved. He did not specify when or provide details, however.

Officials at Fort Leavenworth previously had said Hasan would be subject to Army regulations.

Hasan dispensed with all criminal defense counsel and represented
himself during his trial. A message left with John Galligan, Hasan's
first criminal defense attorney who still represents him in civil
matters, was not returned.

"I think the Department of Defense should allow Muslim soldiers the option of being released as conscientious objectors to increase the morale of non-Muslim soldiers in the military as well as decrease adverse events," Hasan says in the video during a power point presentation.

Bearing an FBI logo, and subtitles, Hasan's presentation titled "The Koranic World View as it relates to Muslims in the US Military" was provided to the defense as part of the discovery process in the Fort Hood case.

FOX News: “I think the Department of Defense should allow Muslim soldiers the option of being released as conscientious objectors to increase the morale of non-Muslim soldiers in the military as well as decrease adverse events.”

The video shows then-Army Major Nidal Hasan giving a presentation at Walter Reed in June 2007. It was titled “The Koranic World View as it relates to Muslims in the US Military."

Experts say the presentation should have been a red flag.

Below, Major Hasan's Islamic power point presentation, made on grand rounds.

Bev Perlson, leader of The Band of Mothers, wrote;

13 Soldiers were murdered by a radical jihadi on our soil wearing our Army uniform and the Traitor-in-Chief in our White House referred to this horrific slaughter as "workplace violence!"

This coddler of Islamists, who commit heinous acts on their own women and children daily, allowed this madman full pay and benefits and did nothing to guarantee our own Sons & Daughters the care and benefits they so deserved! At the same time, and over and over again, we have heard this "unaffected" callous Campaigner-in-Chief tell us that Islam is a religion of peace! We have not heard one word from him when our

Soldiers are murdered using the very guns and bullets we are supplying these murderers! not one word from this apologist in the White House when we lose one of our precious Sons to these animals who are using our guns and bullets to kill our own!

And when 4 precious Sons were attacked and brutally murdered at our embassy in Benghazi, this despicable Traitor in the White House, and his cowardly and devious administration, actually believed that blaming this atrocity on a video that offended Muslims was somehow a way to justify the murder of our precious American Sons!

Now, this Traitor wants all of us to put our Sons and Daughters in harm's way AGAIN to punish these "peaceful" fanatics who have gassed their own people. So let's get this straight, when these "peaceful" people murder Americans over and over again (let's not forget Boston!!) there is no outrage from this "unaffected" President in our White House. The murderers of our Sons in Benghazi are still running around freely, but yet when these "peaceful" people are murdering each other, this nutcase expects us to send in our Sons, once again, to act as sacrificial lambs to carry out his absolutely insane policies and his pandering to a bunch of thugs that think nothing of chopping off heads and gassing their own people!

And let's all remember, this dangerous and despicable administration have purged our training manuals for our Troops of any reference to Islamic terrorism so exactly what and who are our Sons and Daughters going to attack?

Righteous. Doing what that lowlife in the White House refused to do. If Obama had been on duty on 9/11/01, that, too, would have been designated "workplace violence." You might think that this would shame the Obama administration, but let's be frank, he has no shame.

These soldiers lost their lives in the jihad war on America.

Gd bless Texas.

"Texas Veterans Land Board to treat Fort Hood victims as combat casualties" The Statesman, August 23, 2013 (thanks to Christian)

exas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson announced Friday that the
Texas Veterans Land Board, which provides loans and retirement home
services to veterans and their families, will treat the spouses of those
killed in the Nov. 5, 2009, Fort Hood shooting “as if they were killed
in combat.”

More than 150 victims and family members are suing the
federal government seeking to have the attack classified as an act of
war, which would lead to increased retirement, medical and disability
benefits.

The federal government has not called Maj. Nidal Hasan,
who was convicted in the shootings Friday, an enemy combatant, which
would open the door to Purple Hearts and expanded benefits.

It’s not clear what Patterson’s announcement means for the spouses of the Fort Hood victims.

“We’re
going to change the rules to give these families full access to VLB
benefits,” Patterson said in a statement. “We’ll let the lawyers work
out the details, but I intend to make sure we honor their sacrifice.”

The US government under the Obama administration is going to extraordinary lengths to protect jihad. The jihadists mean to destroy and eliminate us and our government is defending and protecting the ideology. Why is motive a consideration in all murder cases except when it comes to Islam and jihad?

(ASSOCIATED PRESS) A military judge blocked several key pieces of
evidence Monday that prosecutors said would explain the mindset of the
soldier accused in the 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, including his
belief that he had a “jihad duty” to carry out the attack.

Prosecutors had asked the judge to approve several witnesses and
various evidence to support what they allege motivated Maj. Nidal Hasan
to kill 13 people and wound more than 30 others at the Texas military
base. But the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, blocked nearly all of it.

Osborn barred any reference Hasan Akbar, a Muslim soldier sentenced
to death for attacking fellow soldiers in Kuwait during the 2003 Iraq
invasion. Prosecutors wanted to prove Hasan’s attack was a “copycat,”
but the judge said introducing such material would “only open the door
to a mini-trial” of Akbar.

I received this email today from Neal M. Sher, attorney for the victims of Nidal Hasan's murderous jihad attack at Fort Hood on November 5, 2009.

As the attorney for the victims of the Ft. Hood massacre,
and their families, I can say unequivocally that at every turn the
Administration and the Army have twisted rules, regulation and common
sense into pretzels to avoid acknowledging what Hasan himself has
admitted prior to the attack and now in court: that he is a committed
and devout jihadist who is fighting for an enemy.

The question which needs an answer: in light of his admission why has
he not been tried for treason, as was Bradley Manning? While his crimes
are most serious, he's not a mass murderer.

Prohibiting the motive from the Fort Hood jihad military trial would be like prohibiting the Nazi ideology from the Nuremberg trials. The Fort Hood jihad was an act of war. 911 was an act of war. It was why we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. The poorly named war on terror is, in fact, the war on the global jihad.

Soldiers were killed on a US military base on US soil. How can motive possibly be ruled inadmissible?

This is only an issue at all because his motives were Islamic. If he had
shouted "Glory to Jesus Christ" and started shooting, there would never
have been a question in the trial as to whether or not his motives were
relevant. If his motives had been entirely secular, there would be no
problem with discussing them. If his motive had been related to
"workplace violence," in accord with the government's claim, it would be
discussed extensively? What murder trial doesn't discuss motive --
indeed, forbids discussion of it? The answer is one that airs
uncomfortable facts about Islamic theology and law -- facts that the
government and mainstream media don't want you to know.

"Prosecution seeks to present evidence of Hasan’s religious motives in Fort Hood shootings," by Jeremy Schwartz for the American-Statesman, August 17 (thanks to Kenneth):

FORT HOOD — A military judge is weighing whether prosecutors
will be allowed to present evidence of Maj. Nidal Hasan’s growing
radicalization and religious motives in the Nov. 5, 2009, shootings.

In everything Hasan says about his murders, he links them to his Islamic
faith. Yet anyone who dared to suggest that perhaps the texts and
teachings of the Islamic faith should be examined so as to understand
his motives and goals more fully would be denounced as "Islamophobic."

"Fort Hood Gunman Told Panel That Death Would Make Him a Martyr," by Manny Fernandez for the New York Times, August 12 (thanks to Kenneth):

KILLEEN, Tex. — One year after he waged a deadly shooting
rampage at the Fort Hood Army base here in November 2009, Major Nidal
Malik Hasan told a panel of military mental health experts that he
wished he had been killed during the attack because it would have meant
God had chosen him for martyrdom.

His statements to the panel, detailed in documents released by Major
Hasan to The New York Times through his civilian lawyer, provided the
first account of the shooting in Major Hasan’s own words and suggested
that he believed the Army’s pursuit of the death penalty offered him
salvation. Paralyzed by police officers who ended the attack when they
shot him four times, he viewed the possibility of death as a badge of
honor, according to the documents.

“I’m paraplegic and could be in jail for the rest of my life,” Major
Hasan told the panel. “However, if I died by lethal injection I would
still be a martyr.”

Major Hasan, 42, an American-born Muslim of Palestinian descent whose
long-delayed court-martial began last week in a Fort Hood courtroom,
said in the documents and in previous statements in and out of court
that he carried out the attack to wage jihad for what he has called the
illegal and immoral wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In the documents, he
described in blunt and unapologetic terms how he killed soldiers as he
stepped into a medical processing building on Nov. 5, 2009. He said he
wore earplugs to muffle the sound of his semiautomatic weapon, and shot
into areas that had the “greatest density of soldiers.” In the end, 13
people were dead.

“I don’t think what I did was wrong because it was for the greater cause of helping my Muslim brothers,” he told the military panel.

"We the Mujahideen are imperfect Muslims trying to establish the perfect religion in the land of the supreme god." Fort Hood jihadi Hasan today in the courtroom.

Staff Sgt. Alonzo M. Lunsford
Jr. was shot seven times by Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan during an attack at
the Fort Hood Army base in 2009. He will testify on the first day of
Major Hasan’s military trial on today. Lisa Krantz/San Antonio Express-News via The NY Times: “I will be cross-examined by the man who shot me,” said Sergeant
Lunsford, 46, who retired from the Army and remains blind in his left
eye. “You can imagine all the emotions that are going to be coming up.”

Nearly four years after the attack, Major Hasan — bearded, paralyzed
after he was shot by the police and thinner than he was in 2009 — will
be wheeled into a courthouse a few miles from the readiness center to
face 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted
premeditated murder. He claimed to have been trying to protect Taliban
leaders from soldiers deploying to Afghanistan, and in his statements
both in and out of the courtroom, he has acknowledged being the gunman.

Obama, is this a new form of domestic terror category, "workplace violence mujahideen"?

The NY Times reports: "The Army has spent more than $5 million on the case, surrounding the
outside of the courthouse with giant sand-packed barriers that protect
against explosions and transporting Major Hasan for hearings by
helicopter from the nearby Bell County Jail, where he is being held at
Army expense.

"The Army has also paid for his military defense lawyers, paralegals and
experts as well as the rental costs for a trailer next to the courthouse
that one lawyer called 'the Hasan hut,' where he works under tight
security."

Hasan said "the evidence will clearly show that I am the shooter. The dead bodies will show that war is an ugly thing."

He has released statements to media outlets about his views on the
Islamic legal code known as Sharia and how it conflicts with American
democracy. (FOX News)

Military executions require presidential approval. Let us pray Obama is long out of office when that time comes.

The Army psychiatrist behind the shooting rampage at Fort Hood nearly four years ago called himself a "mujahideen" in a short and unrepentant opening statement at his military trial, which will likely feature the bizarre spectacle of him questioning his own victims.

Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, who is serving as his own attorney, began his court martial with an opening statement less than two minutes long as the military trial began under heavy security at the Texas base. He faces the death penalty for the Nov. 5, 2009 rampage, in which 13 people were killed and where witnesses said Hasan yelled "Alahu Akhbar!" as he sprayed gunfire at unarmed fellow soldiers.

"The evidence presented in this trial will only show one side, that I was on the wrong side, and then I switched sides," Hasan said. "We the Mujahideen are imperfect Muslims trying to establish the perfect religion in the land of the supreme god."

It was not clear how the 42-year-old Hasan plans to fashion his stance into a defense. Hasan had wanted to argue that he shot U.S. troops to protect Taliban fighters in Afghanistan, but the judge forbade the American-born Muslim and former Army psychiatrist from using that defense.

Earlier, prosecutor Col. Steve Henricks said Hasan hoped to "kill as many soldiers as he could."
Henricks told the military jury Hasan picked the date of the attack for a specific reason, though he did not immediately reveal details.

Contrary to Obama's debased and despicable treatment of the heroes and victims of the Fort Hood jihad massacre, a number of decent and righteous members of Congress are standing up against the seditious reign of the Obama regime.

When the bloodcurdling wails of Hasan's "allahu akbar" was reverberating through the country, Obama urged us not to "rush to judgement." Obama, it's been five years. Is it still too soon to call jihad jihad? Funny, Obama expressed no such "abundance of caution" when jumping on the race wagon to publicly lynch George Zimmerman.

As the long delayed trial of alleged Fort Hood shooter, Major Nidal Hasan, gets under way, congressional supporters of Hasan's victims are introducing new legislation to get them the benefits they say the Army has denied them.

The Justice for Fort Hood Heroes Act, introduced Friday, would ensure
that the victims of the Fort Hood attack receive the same benefits as
Purple Heart recipients, including combat-related special compensation.

The attack left 13 dead and more than 30 injured.

Many of the Fort Hood victims say they've been denied Purple Hearts, as
well as some financial and medical benefits due to the military's
refusal to categorize the massacre as an act of terrorism, instead
discussing it as "workplace violence."

The designation came despite evidence showing that Hasan was in
communication with al Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki prior to the attack.
In a letter in late May, a top Army attorney said that "the available
evidence in this case does not, at this time, support a finding that the
shooting at Fort Hood was an act of international terrorism."

Meanwhile, in a new development, Hasan has released seven pages of
handwritten and typed documents in which he appears to renounce his U.S.
citizenship, abandons his military oath and further discusses his
relationship with Awlaki.

PHOTO: Lisa Krantz/San Antonio Express-News: Staff Sgt. Alonzo M. Lunsford
Jr. was shot seven times by Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan during an attack at
the Fort Hood Army base in 2009. He will testify on the first day of
Major Hasan’s military trial on Tuesday. A soldier whom Sergeant Lunsford recognized, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan,
walked in front of him. Moments later, Sergeant Lunsford said, Major
Hasan twice shouted “Allahu akbar,” Arabic for “God is great,” and opened fire.

People fighting back the surrender of our government to jihad and Muslim Brotherhood operatives. This is spectacular news. There is a sickness in this adminsitration and if the decent and responsible elected officials won't fight -- the people will.

"Survivors of Fort Hood jihad massacre suing U.S. government for allowing jihad murderer Hasan to rise through ranks because of political correctness " Jihadwatch, August 5, 2013

"The rules on the conduct of military officers were
ignored. He was a terrible physician and had no business treating
soldiers. Yet, because of where he came from, and how he prayed to his
god, they promoted him and set him loose and ignored his open, very
obvious jihadism."

Absolutely so. And everything that made that possible is still in place, and stronger than ever.

"Was the Fort Hood gunman left unchecked because of political
correctness? Victims of mass shooting which killed 13 and injured 32 sue
U.S. government over claims military failed to tackle soldiers'
radicalisation," by Suzannah Hills for the Daily Mail, August 4 (thanks to Darcy):

Survivors of the Fort Hood massacre are suing the U.S.
government for allowing a jihadist soldier to rise through the ranks
unchecked because of 'political correctness'.

Major Nidal Hasan, 42, is charged with 13 counts of premeditated
murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder for after
launching an attack at the Texas Army post in November 2009.

Will Obama's Department of Justice pursue hate speech charges against these prosecutors? Have Muslim Brotherhood groups like Hamas-CAIR demanded that the prosecutor be removed for "islamophobia."

But Obama said it was "workplace violence." He is despicable. And Obama did it in Benghazi, too. He knew that was jihad, too. But he blamed our freedoms for the blood on his hands.

Prosecutors Friday likened Maj. Nidal Hasan
to a suicide bomber, saying he carefully researched the issue of going
on jihad before an attack that left 13 people dead and 32 wounded, all
but two of them soldiers.

It took five years, five years, to get to this moment. Look at us a decade after 911. Shame on the electorate.

One interesting point: "until now, the prosecution has avoided stating a motive, but on Friday asked the judge, Col. Tara Osborn,
to allow them to present witnesses and evidence that would show Hasan
not only studied jihad but argued for it while pursing a master's
degree, and that he claimed U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were
not justified."

“Motive is not an element in the trial,” Osborn told prosecutors. “It's not an element,” Henricks replied, “but it is a way to prove an element, which is premeditation.”

The day is often called “5/11” in the Fort Hood community.

Here's the thing. Motive should be an element. And I am not talking about the vicious and silly "hate crime" laws which Bush should never have signed off on.

On 911, jihad came to America. The objective of this war is to destroy and defeat this nation. 911 wasn't a criminal act. It was an act of war. Major Hasan's crime is not a law enforcement matter. He atacked our soldiers on American soil. Jihad is war and he should be executed. Motive is everything

This
undated file photo provided by the Bell County Sheriff's Department
shows Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist charged in the 2009 Fort Hood
shooting rampage that left 13 dead.

FORT HOOD — Prosecutors Friday likened Maj. Nidal Hasan
to a suicide bomber, saying he carefully researched the issue of going
on jihad before an attack that left 13 people dead and 32 wounded, all
but two of them soldiers.

It was the first time the government has
made the allegation or cited evidence that would support the claim that
Hasan sought to martyr himself at the end of the massacre.

“We believe that just like a suicide bomber, Major Hasan had no intention of leaving 5/11 alive,” Col. Steve Henricks, one of three prosecutors, said, referring to the day of the attack.

An
American born of Palestinian immigrants, Hasan has told a court here
that he was the gunman in the Nov. 5, 2009 rampage, and that he hoped to
stop U.S. soldiers from killing Taliban insurgents, their leader Mullah Mohammad Omar and innocent Afghan women and children.

The day is often called “5/11” in the Fort Hood community.

Prosecutors
have charged Hasan with 13 counts of premeditated murder. He faces
another 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder in the worst shooting
of its kind at an American military installation.

Until now, the prosecution has avoided stating a motive, but on Friday asked the judge, Col. Tara Osborn,
to allow them to present witnesses and evidence that would show Hasan
not only studied jihad but argued for it while pursing a master's
degree, and that he claimed U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were
not justified.

Prosecutors also said that Hasan modeled his attack
on an incident in which then-Sgt. Hasan Akbar killed two soldiers and
wounded 14 on March 23, 2003 in Kuwait. Akbar was sentenced to death.

Henricks
called Hasan's attack a “copy-cat” killing. Henricks also said that
Hasan did what he could to avoid a deploying to the war zone, including
entering a master's of psychology fellowship program in August 2007. He
quoted Hasan as saying “the Army and the government have another thing
coming if they they're going to deploy me.”

The attack occurred a little more than two weeks after Hasan learned he would be sent to Afghanistan.

Prosecutors
told Osborn that Hasan had one problem with jihad — killing innocent
bystanders. To avoid that, he purchased a handgun with a laser sight,
Henricks said, and noted that witnesses say the Army psychiatrist
avoided killing civilians.

Two civilians, a government civil
service employee and a contract police officer, were shot that day. All
the other victims were soldiers preparing to deploy.

“Motive is not an element in the trial,” Osborn told prosecutors.

“It's not an element,” Henricks replied, “but it is a way to prove an element, which is premeditation.”

His allegiance now is to the global umma. How many other citizens of the global umma do we have in our midst and in our military? And since he did this on October 18, 2012, why are we only hearing about it now?

His loyalty is and always has been to the umma, the global
Muslim community. How many perpetrators of "workplace violence" renounce
their U.S. citizenship in the lead-up to their trial? How long is the
U.S. government's self-defeating charade of denial of the reality of
jihad and Islamic supremacism going to continue?

FORT HOOD, Texas -- Days before he's set to go on trial, the
Army psychiatrist charged in the Fort Hood shooting rampage released
more of his writings about America and Islam.

Foxnews.com on Thursday posted documents in which Maj. Nidal Hasan
renounced his U.S. citizenship and soldier's oath and denounced
democracy. Hasan is charged in the November 2009 rampage that killed 13
soldiers and wounded more than 30 people at the Texas Army post. His
court-martial is scheduled to start Tuesday.

The renunciation of U.S. citizenship is contained in a handwritten note dated Oct. 18, 2012, Fox News reported. A
typewritten note that does not have a date says it is not "permissible"
for someone to prefer American democracy over traditional Islamic
Sharia law, the network also reported. Hasan wrote that Muslims should not "compromise their beliefs" for the sake of non-Muslims.

Hasan also wrote about Anwar al-Awlaki, a radical U.S.-born Islamic
cleric killed by a drone strike in Yemen in 2011. The government has
said that Hasan, a U.S.-born Muslim, had sent more than a dozen emails
to al-Awlaki starting in December 2008. Hasan described al-Awlaki as his
"teacher, mentor and friend," Fox News reported....

Major Hassan continues to act consistently a self-proclaimed soldier of allah. Hasan, the Fort Hood jihadi, is a hero to jihadists the world over -- celebrated and lionized by terror groups and leaders. Major Muslim Hasan distributed Qurans on the morning of his jihad massacre. His card called infidels to
convert to Islam on the day of his jihad (dawah). He wore the
garb of the shaheed on the day of his jihad. He war-cried "allahu akbar" when
he opened fire on our troops in cold blood.

Obama refuses to allow Fort Hood to be labeled terror. Instead, it is
"workplace violence," which means that the victims and their families
are
unable to collect combat pay. Who is more deserving of combat pay? We
must right this horrible wrong by a feckless and reckless
commander-in-chief. Every new statement by this monster confirms how urgently that must be done.

EXCLUSIVE: Acting
as his own attorney, accused Fort Hood shooter Major Nidal Hasan has
released a statement to Fox News claiming that the U.S. military is at
war with his religion.

However, he does not directly address the shooting at the Texas Army
Base in November 2009 that killed 13 and injured more than 30 others.

“My complicity was on behalf of a government that openly acknowledges
that it would hate for the law of Almighty Allah to be the supreme law
of the land," the 42-year-old Army psychiatrist said. Hasan then
apparently asked if this was a war on Islam. "You bet it is," he said.
"I participated in it.”

The statement, which begins “In the name of Almighty Allah, the most
gracious and the most merciful, my name is Nidal Hasan, Major Nidal
Hasan, and I would like to convey a message to the world,” runs more
than six pages.

Hasan also says he regrets his years in the Army, claiming that his
service was inconsistent with his religious beliefs. “I would like to
begin by repenting to Almighty Allah and apologize to the (Mujahideen),
the believers, and the innocent. I ask for their forgiveness and their
prayers. I ask for their forgiveness for participating in the illegal
and immoral aggression against Muslims, their religion and their lands,”
he said.

Hasan also criticized U.S. policy in the Middle East toward the Palestinians.

While Hasan’s motivation for releasing the statement is unknown, Fox
News has repeatedly requested an interview with him, with a specific
focus on his alleged actions at the Fort Hood Readiness Center on Nov.
5, 2009.

It is believed to be the first lengthy statement by the Fort Hood
suspect, whose court martial begins August 6. The judge in Hasan’s case
recently ruled that he cannot argue as part of his defense that the
shooting was an effort to protect Taliban leaders in Afghanistan – the
so-called “defense of others” strategy.

George Stratton and his son -- who was wounded in the attack -- will
both testify at the trial. Stratton told Fox News he is not surprised
by the statement.

“I have all along believed Nidal Hasan to be a Muslim terrorist, so
it confirms what I’ve always thought,” Stratton said. “I believe that’s
exactly how he felt when he did what he did. We should take him at his
word.”

Lawyer Neal Sher, who represents Fort Hood shooting victims and their
families in a separate legal action, said “This is yet further
confirmation of a fact that everyone knows except our government. That
is, the Fort Hood shooting was a terrorist jihadi attack.”

If convicted, on 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of
attempted premeditated murder, Hasan faces execution or life in prison
without parole.

An extended examination of his statement, and reaction to it, will be
part of an upcoming Fox News special investigation scheduled to air in
early August. "Fox Files: The Enemy Within," first broadcast in June
2012, was part of Fox's ongoing investigation into the Fort Hood
shooting and the connection to the first American targeted for death by
the CIA, Anwar al-Awalki [sic].

The House Appropriations Committee is using next year's appropriations bill to demand from the Department of Justice a clear answer as to the department's alleged role in avoiding calling the Fort Hood massacre an act of terrorism. Finally, elected officials are calling out sedition.

They should also be asking why the White House has been withholding evidence in the case since 2009. We have been hearing for years that the White House is withholding
evidence on the Fort Hood jihadi, Major Nidal Malik Hasan. This was
confirmed by Hasan's own lawyer. Perhaps that is why Hasan's lawyer, John
Galligan, stepped down as Hasan's lawyer in 2011.

A memorial to victims of the Fort Hood
shooting is shown before the start of a memorial service, to be attended
by President Barack Obama, at Fort Hood, Texas, Nov. 10, 2009. (Donna McWilliam/AP Photo)

The House Appropriations Committee is using next year's appropriations
bill to demand from the Department of Justice a clear answer as to the
department's alleged role in avoiding calling the Fort Hood massacre an act of terrorism.

The bill, approved by the committee Wednesday, as currently written will
fund the department with $26.3 billion in 2014, but also directs it to
submit a detailed report within 120 days "specifying its role… on how
this case was designated with regard to terrorism." It will next face a
vote on the House floor.

The bill asks the DOJ to describe "what anti-terror investigative
authority was sought by Departmental entities, and whether such
authority was approved. In addition, the report should describe the
Department's policy and practices in categorizing cases and the criteria
it employs to determine which cases represent terrorism
investigations."

FORT HOOD, Texas – The Army
psychiatrist charged in the 2009 deadly Fort Hood shooting rampage told
some potential jurors Wednesday that he supports the Taliban and the
strict Islamic Sharia law.

Maj. Nidal Hasan, who is serving as his own attorney in his
court-martial, asked questions of individual Army officers on the second
day of jury selection. On Tuesday after the first group of 20 potential
jurors arrived, he declined to ask questions.

Hasan, 42, faces execution or life without parole if convicted in the
rampage that left 13 dead and nearly three dozen wounded on the Texas
Army post on Nov. 5, 2009.

In answering Hasan's questions, several potential jurors said they
had negative views of Muslims, the Quran or Sharia law. But they said
they could put aside those views and only consider evidence in the case.

[...]

A 13- to 16-member jury -- with ranks equal to or higher than Hasan's --
will be chosen for his court-martial. Death-penalty cases in the
military require at least 12 jury members, more than in other cases. And
unlike other trials, their verdict must be unanimous in finding guilt
or assessing a sentence.