Yeah, they start by putting McNabb ahead of 2x SB winner Roethlisberger, and put Lorenzo Neal, though a great FB, ahead of Shaun Alexander, who was the best RB in the NFL for 2 years...

Not a great list...

And they don't even mention Kampman... But do Julius Peppers... Go take a look at the production both had during the decade, and tell me in a straight face that Peppers was better than Kampman...

Click to expand...

Neal was a fullback, Alexander was a big halfback. Different positions.

And the numbers back up the Peppers over Kampman pick. And it's really not even close. 81 sacks to 54. 6 double digit sack seasons to 2. And they were in the league the same amount of years. I don't care what you'll say about how Kampman tries hard on every play and Peppers takes plays off, you really can't argue all that much with those numbers.

Neal was a fullback, Alexander was a big halfback. Different positions.

And the numbers back up the Peppers over Kampman pick. And it's really not even close. 81 sacks to 54. 6 double digit sack seasons to 2. And they were in the league the same amount of years. I don't care what you'll say about how Kampman tries hard on every play and Peppers takes plays off, you really can't argue all that much with those numbers.

Click to expand...

Well, you're right. In the decade, you're right.

If you take the time Kampman was a starter, then it's a different thing.

If you consider running plays (A.K.A tackles) then it's a different thing.

But since 2002, Peppers has been more productive than Kampman. Even taking plays off...