Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars

Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve...
Venkat Narayanan, J.; Gurram, Prashanthi; Krishnan, Radhika; Muthusubramanian, Veerabahu; Sadesh Kannan, V.
2017-05-25 00:00:00
Oral Maxillofac Surg (2017) 21:295–299 DOI 10.1007/s10006-017-0628-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars 1 2 3 J. Venkat Narayanan & Prashanthi Gurram & Radhika Krishnan & 3 4 Veerabahu Muthusubramanian & V. Sadesh Kannan Received: 27 December 2016 /Accepted: 1 May 2017 /Published online: 25 May 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017 Abstract obtained which is not statistically significant. Hence, no sig- Aim The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of 4% nificant difference in the pain score was established between articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline given as buccal and lin- both groups. The adverse effects of both the local anesthetics gual infiltration in adult patients undergoing erupted mandib- if any were noted. ular first and second molar teeth extraction versus inferior Conclusion From this study, we concluded that the use of 4% alveolar nerve block technique using 2% lignocaine with articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline is as effective as inferior 1:80,000 adrenaline. alveolar nerve block with lignocaine but without the risk of Materials and methods A total of 100 patients undergoing attendant adverse effects of inferior alveolar nerve block extraction
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngOral and Maxillofacial SurgerySpringer Journalshttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/infiltrative-local-anesthesia-with-articaine-is-equally-as-effective-IR9iPCrjcL

Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars

Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic

Rosenberg, AP; Ketan, GA; Yigal, Z; Louis, ML

Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars

Corbett, IP; Kanaa, MD; John, MW; John, GM

The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth

Douglas, R; John, N; Reader, A; Beck, M; Melissa, MC

An evaluation of buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pulpal anesthesia for mandibular first molars

Il-Jung, Y; Kim, JH; Kim, E-S; Lee, CL; Lee, SJ

Articaine: a review of literature

Yapp, KE; Hopcraft, MS; Parashos, P

Articiane and lidocaine for maxillary infiltration anesthesia

Vahatalo, K; Antila, H; Lehtinen, R

Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system

Nusstein, J; Berlin, J; Reader, A; Beck, M; Weaver, JM

A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks

Nusstein, J; Reader, A; Beck, M; Weaver, JM

Articaine and lignocaine efficiency in infiltration anaesthesia: a pilot study

Oliveira, PC; Volpato, MC; Ramacciato, JC; Ranali, J

Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine

Oertel, R; Rahn, R; Kirch, W

Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study