Pages

Recently, a reader sent me a question about how to tell a
story through the antagonist's perspective.This person allowed me to post a generic version of our exchange here in hope that others
might find it useful.

***

Question:

I want to
see if I can write a killer through his point of view. I can't figure out a believable motive. Can't
figure out how to make that work and everything else he does.

Answer:

You're not talking about an anti hero -- Robin
Hood and Cap'n Jack Sparrow are anti heroes -- you're talking about telling the
antagonist's story from his point of view. In short, that won't
work. Well, it won't work easily, without a lot of reader manipulation
carefully added so that it doesn't feel like manipulation.

You see, anti heroes are difficult to write because reader involvement requires
sympathy for the main character. Without it, readers don't care about the
character and they get bored with the story. Antagonists by definition
are unsympathetic, because their role is to attack the people we root for.These actions are why we see them as the bad
guys.Imagine The Silence of the Lambs told through Hannibal Lecter's eyes.
His character would have to change significantly for the reader to
follow, because while his intelligence is admirable, Lecter is inhuman. How can the average
person sympathize -- or even understand -- a character whose goal is to
cannibalize another human being in the most humiliating way imaginable?

This is why, in my opinion, Thomas Harris chose Clarice Starling as the
viewpoint. It's easy for the reader to sympathize with someone who is
young, green, innocent, and even has a cute birdie name. We might never have
pondered the best wine to serve with human liver, but we've all felt intimidated
and overwhelmed by an assignment.Furthermore, Starling's primary traits are absent from Lector's character.
These individuals balance each other out, thus belong together.

Your character could stay as-is in a longer, novelette-to-novel range
story. Something that could support multiple viewpoints. That way
you could switch from one to the other to give the reader not only someone to
root for but also a relief from the intensity of the killer's uncomfortable
perspective.

The killer could be mentally ill in a way that he doesn't understand his own actions. The reader might sympathize, especially if the killer feels grief. This changes the motive and in fact the foundation of the personality so that he will feel less like a killer and more like someone who is suffering.

Otherwise, you're going to have to find a way to make killing his victim justified.
The victim must be a heinous person who has done something unquestionably wicked. Even
then, you've got a lot of work ahead of you to convince the reader that killing
the person is better than simply turning him or her over to the police.

Another route might be that the killer is saving his intended victim from a fate
worse than death. This will put the reader in agony.They will hate you for it, but they won't be
able to put the story down, and they will hope you do it to them again in the
next story.

Keep in mind, however, that these last two
possibilities shift the killer from antagonist to a heroic character.That might not be what you want.

Your idea is a good starting point, because it forces you to make it
plausible. If you can find a way to make an inhuman character someone the
reader is willing to follow, you will indeed have a good story on your
hands.Playing these what-if games are
what evoke the most interesting and original ideas.