The U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has never been a paragon of restraint. It has relentlessly peddled fear. IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri has been as irresponsible as Al Gore and Prince Charles in his pronouncements about the dangers of man-made global warming.

In Pachauri's greatest moments, he has said "there's not a moment to lose" in our fight against climate change; claimed that "no one on this planet will be untouched by climate change"; warned that it's "five minutes before midnight" of the coming global warming disaster; predicted a destabilized "human society"; and swore in 2007 that "if there's no action before 2012," then it would be "too late."

Meanwhile, his own IPCC has commissioned four models to predict the impact of global warming in this century. The verdict: There's nothing to worry about.

Matt Ridley, once alarmed by the threat of Climate Change and now a realist, wrote in the Financial Post,

The answer to climate change is, and always has been, innovation. To worry now in 2014 about a very small, highly implausible set of circumstances in 2100 that just might, if climate sensitivity is much higher than the evidence suggests, produce a marginal damage to the world economy, makes no sense. Think of all the innovation that happened between 1914 and 2000. Do we really think there will be less in this century?

Why would the United Nations suddenly come clean on Global Warming?Is this an act of self-preservation by the United Nations?Is there global concern that Obama is about to destroy the economic foundations of the United States and render it incapable of financially supporting the high rollers who inhabit the United Nations and the dictators and thugs who run most of the nations?