I used to use Winamp, and I recently switched to foobar2000. In my opinion, foobar2000 is the better app in terms of flexibility, and it's a little less resource hogging than Winamp.
<br/>
<br/>Glad to see that Winamp is still dominating as a good music player though.

Still the best, most useful all round media player, despite such a credible challenge from Quintessential. Winamp just goes on quietly getting better and even more solid. Lovely flexible intuitive interface, plug-ins for just about any format out there, peerless streaming radio, and still, I think, the best library and playlist integration around.

i have problems with winamp all the time, it miught b bcuz i have about 230 songs/vidoes in one list, and it doesn't have a dependant area to recieve songs from, u use the browser tool in it to find the song or w/e u wan to be in the list, that's y i hate windows media player, but it's the only program so easy to use to make a playlist and add/alter itany suggestions from newhere else, and i agree with thebox he likes the eque option, that rox

There's no maybe about it at this point. I use Winamp for my streaming listening/viewing and for all the video file types it will support. If you want a lightweight very powerful audio player that does not try to "phone home" to AOL (or anybody else) try Foobar 2000. Not very slick looking but solid.
<a href="http://www.foobar2000.org/" class="korostus" target="_blank">http://www.foobar2000.org/</a>

I was just thinking the same thing! Wasn't v5.06 the "final version"? Or was AOL just blowing smoke up our asses? Justin, you made a great player, and you deserve to be rich, but DAMN YOU for selling it to AOL! Look whats happened!!