p>
November 1, 2007: One of the
unspoken truths is that military needs do not always determine what is, or is
not, purchased by the U.S. Department of Defense. It is not unusual for
projects to be funded by Congressional fiat. Sometimes, they are useful. Other
times, it's just a politician bringing home the bacon to their state or
district. The latest example is a series of "earmarks" (in essence, a
Congressional directive saying that this money WILL be spent on a certain
project) from a Senator and two Congressmen in Washington state dating back to
1999. These earmarks have been for the purchase of a series of small patrol
craft.

One might think that in a
global war on terror, small patrol craft are a good idea, particularly around
American ports, or ports in areas where American forces have deployed. The
problem is that the Coast Guard and Navy have evaluated these earmarked boats,
and found them to be not useful. Yet, Congress has the final word on spending,
and despite these evaluations, more earmarks have emerged.

Part of this is a Navy bias
against small vessels. This is somewhat understandable, as many of these small
boats need to be delivered to likely operating theaters. The boats also require
a support vessel like a tender. The tender becomes a target for terrorists and
a high-value one at that. This then makes the patrol boats largely dependent on
a land base, and that requires a friendly host nation. It is much simpler for
the Navy to get a littoral combat ship or frigate, either of which can carry two
MH-60 helicopters equipped with torpedoes, Penguin anti-ship missiles, Hellfire
missiles, and a 7.62mm or 12.7mm machine gun, to patrol a region in a number of
roles (anti-submarine, anti-ship, or general patrol).

Helicopters are even faster
than patrol boats, and their firepower is more than sufficient to blast any
pirate or smuggler out of the water. They can also be based off a ship, and do
not require a host nation. That said, they lack persistence, and they even run
more expensive than a patrol craft (the patrol craft Congress ordered run about
$5 million per copy, the MH-60R runs at about $29 million per copy).

In essence, the Navy has made
a decision to largely rely on helicopters. In essence, their disadvantages are
relative small compared to their advantages and flexibility. But some in
Congress aren't listening, and the Navy will find itself having to deal with
small craft they may not want.  Harold C. Hutchison
(haroldc.hutchison@gmail.com)

Help Keep Us Afloat! Go to other sites on the World Wide Web and they look like the a mad marketer has gained control of them. Lots of ads and little content! Ad revenues are down for everyone! We don’t want to follow the crowd. But here is the deal we cannot keep our site relative ad free without your support. Each month we need your subscriptions or contributions plus what meager ad revenue we do receive to stay in business. You can support us in the following ways:

Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.

You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..