Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

expat wrote:Out of curiosity, which firms pay above market? With the exception of Wachtell (which I realize is because of the bonus, not the base), I have only ever heard people say "some boutiques."

No firm that hires entry level attorneys is paying "above market." So don't worry about that.

What you need to worry about are the firms that pay below market or are about to pay below market or have slashed their bonuses or about to withdraw offers before the summer even starts or plan on no offering half of the class or decide they are no offering half the class during the final week of the summer or plan on announcing the deferral of your full time start date fall 3L year or announce it the summer after you graduate or wait until a month before your start date to indefinitely defer you or withdraw your offer outright or hire you and then "Latham" you 6 months later or hire you etc...

Wachtell's base-pay is actually 165k, so slightly above market. Boies comes to mind as one that does hire entry level and pays slightly above market. For the most part we're talking about 5-10k over, so nothing drastic.

Are you guys just searching for the most unobtainable jobs in support of this ridiculous "market-plus" salary thread? Seriously, more people have commanded the Space Shuttle than have ever been associates at Susman. The firms you are discussing are competing with one another over impeccably pedigreed 9th/2d/D.C Cir./SCOTUS clerks: of course they pay more than firms hiring students off of the Fordham Law Review.

also clarifying: while i dropped kirkland as an example, it wasnt meant to be an example of an above-market paying unattainable firm. i posted it because i think it's not nearly as unattainable as the other firms mentioned in this thread, and gives you a decent shot of making above market.

also, boies is not that unattainable either. they try to recruit the best and the brightest, but those students often have offers at firms with better cultures (i.e., firms with a significant number of equity partners, near 100% SA offer rate, more diversified practices, etc.)

edit: I think Kramer Levin and Irell do some degree of profit-sharing for their associates. Kramer is not that hard to get at all from a top law school, and top third or so at a place like Columbia should give you a good shot at Irell.

You won't become an associate at Wachtell coming from outside of the t6 (MVP could have an outside chance). Yes, they have a couple partners who aren't from that mold, but something tells me they brought quite the impressive resume/book by the time they headed over to Wachtell.

As mentioned, outside of Wachtell a few places will pay a little better than 160k+ NYC Bonus. W&C does the $180k with no bonus, Boies pays a slightly higher base, Irell has consistently paid 160k with a bonus roughly double in size to the standard bonus NYC firms have been giving out the last few years.

MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.

MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.

I remembered seeing a couple associates from MVP when I went through their site, just couldn't remember which one of the 3 so I wanted to throw in a disclaimer to my t6 comment. Now that you mention it, I think Penn was the only one of the 3 listed as an associate's school.

Actually just went through again, 8 or 9 associates from Penn. Also two associates with J.D.s from Northwestern, both also had an MBA From Kellogg though. A Cornell, Notre Dame and 2 Howard J.D.s listed as associates as well.

MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.

Among current associates who graduated from law school in the last 5 years (2005-2009), 9 T14s are represented:

MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.

Among current associates who graduated from law school in the last 5 years (2005-2009), 9 T14s are represented:

One thing people have to realize about a firm like Wachtell is that working there for a few years and then lateraling can actually be a very attractive thing. When you have worked at a small elite firm like Wachtell (or Williams and Conolly, Boies, Munger etc.) where you get real experience (unlike at many of the other massive V10 firms where you don't get to touch much substantive work) you are a very attractive hire. Actually if you want to make partner at firms like Kirkland and Skadden, you have a better shot working at a small firm that gives substantive work and then lateraling to the larger firms.

MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.

You're putting way too much stock in where the firm recruits. WLRK also does OCI at UCLA/Texas/Howard, but you can bet your ass someone who is top of the class at Virginia/Michigan/Duke probably has just as good or better chances.