This week Natasha and I discuss the judgment in the Sharon Shoesmith case and the latest in the Young divorce saga. In the usual light-hearted finish, I detail a cunning scheme for divorce lawyers to drum up new business.

After the Easter hiatus, Natasha and I return with our ninth Lorecast, in which we discuss the case of Re W (Children), in which the court sought the views of a six-year-old child, a study that indicates that marriage has no bearing on children's outcomes and the tricky problem of dealing with pets on divorce.