Beacon Hill Institute survey finds
that most gubernatorial candidates would be more fiscally conservative than
legislature.

Where do the candidates for governor stand on
the subject of tax and fiscal policy? The answer is, Well to the right
of the Massachusetts legislature.

The Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University
has released the results of a questionnaire that it sent to every candidate
earlier this year. BHI received responses from Democrats Shannon O'Brien, Robert
Reich, Warren Tolman and Steve Grossman (who has since dropped out of the race),
from Republican Mitt Romney and from Libertarian Carla Howell.

Democrat Tom Birmingham and Green Party candidate
Jill Stein did not respond.

Among the respondents still in the race, there
was agreement on how they would not raise taxes. On the subject of rolling
back the income tax to 5.0%, as approved by the voters in 2000, all the respondents
supported either implementing the rollback or temporarily freezing the rate
at 5.3%.

Of the five respondents, four supported renewal
of research and development tax credits for business, with the fifth respondent
not answering. Four (with one respondent not answering) indicated that they
favored tighter controls on state spending. Respondents were also given the
opportunity to explain their positions.

In view of this year's round of legislated tax
increases, it is important to note how candidates indicated they would not
raise taxes.

 They would not decrease the personal
exemption, as the legislature did this year.

 They would not rescind the deduction
for charitable giving, also approved by the voters in 2000 and also rescinded
by the legislature this year.

 They would not consider increasing the
income tax to 5.6%, as some legislators are threatening to do next year.

 They would not weaken Proposition 2 1/2
(although one respondent did suggest studying the issue).

 They would not raise the sales tax, as
some legislators wanted to do this year.

Taken together, the survey suggests that Massachusetts
can expect to have a governor who will be more conservative than the legislature,
at least when it comes to matters of tax and fiscal policy. The only questions
on which a majority of respondents favored higher taxes related to tobacco and
gasoline excise taxes. And three candidates (O'Brien, Reich and Tolman) favored
higher gasoline excise taxes as a substitute for recent toll increases.

Of the respondents, the only candidate to break
sharply from the pack is Libertarian Carla Howell, who would abolish the state
income tax and put tight controls on state spending. Warren Tolman was the only
Democratic candidate to support the voter-approved income tax rollback and charitable
deduction.

Commenting on the survey, Frank Conte, BHI Director
of Communications and Information Systems, said, The purpose of the survey
was to provide all candidates with an opportunity to spell out their tax and
fiscal policy positions clearly and thoroughly in light of the budget crisis.
While other issues tend to grab the spotlight in the course of a political campaign,
taxpayers have a right to know how each candidate will approach tax policy and
how that approach might differ from recent tax increases passed by the state
legislature.

Most of the gubernatorial candidates expressed
a strong willingness to look beyond just raising taxes as a solution,
he added. Moreover, it appears that all candidates have an eye toward
keeping the state competitive in terms of tax policy.