The Serious 9/11 Arguments Compilation.

Again, why would breaking steel floor connections make large amounts of dust? Again, example after example has been provided that the most dust
created is either from the detonation of explosives, when the floor system impacts the ground, or when the building hits the ground.

Sorry, you failed to make your case again. Especially in the sense of supposed CD and that WTC 7 had no traps to catch ejected materials from
detonations.

Nice when you debunk yourself.

Then post a video of a collapsing building from something other than the WTC creating largest amounts of dust mid collapse without explosives.

originally posted by: Jesushere
neutronflux NIST is claiming entire floors are collapsing not just steel supports before the full collapse.

Again
Again....

Again, why would breaking steel floor connections make large amounts of dust? Again, example after example has been provided that the most dust
created is either from the detonation of explosives, when the floor system impacts the ground, or when the building hits the ground.

Sorry, you failed to make your case again. Especially in the sense of supposed CD and that WTC 7 had no traps to catch ejected materials from
detonations.

Nice when you debunk yourself.

Then post a video of a collapsing building from something other than the WTC creating largest amounts of dust mid collapse without explosives.

It was not just steel collapsing. Floors with stuff in them came down as well prior to collapse. Do you think a floor collapsing does not result in a
dust plume really truly Jesus? Imagine 47 floors came down.

originally posted by: Jesushere
You are dumb are just too delusional to deal with.

It was not just steel collapsing. Floors with stuff in them came down as well prior to collapse. Do you think a floor collapsing does not result in a
dust plume really truly Jesus? Imagine 47 floors came down.

Then post a video of a collapsing building from something other than the WTC creating largest amounts of dust mid collapse without explosives.

You think 47 entire floors collapsing inside WTC7 would not produce dust plumes and rocketing debris in every direction?

Not if it was an east to west progressive collapse that was slow enough not to have to push air out like the towers where air of an entire floor was
expelled in a fraction of a second.

And the buckling was lower in WTC 7 so the interior fell with resistance only met near the ground. Where video after video was posted as examples of
structural collapse showing the greatest creator of dust is when the floors/building strike the ground. Vs where a 11 or 29 story hammer was smashing
through each floor below as in the twin towers.

Again, you are confusing what should be the ejection of material if explosions were cutting the steel columns. Especially in the sense there was no
traps set up in WTC 7 to capture ejected material from the supposed explosions like a normal demolitions implosion.

Katie Bender's family commemorate 20 years since Royal Canberra Hospital implosion

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.