How about reporting the whole purpose of the bill to remove a loophole of
receiving anonymous donations and not knowing what to do with them. Most
Legislators don't get any anonymous donations, but if you get one, what do
you do with it? Current law is silent. This solves it by making sure anything
over $100 goes to charity or the government.

This has nothing to do about WHO sponsored the
legislation. It has everything to do about WHO supports the legislation. This
bill is all about "closing a (silent) loophole" in the existing law
– nothing more, nothing less.

In my book, one Democrat and
seven Republicans are "out to lunch" on this one.

For the first few posters: What are you beefing about? Those dastardly
Republicans finally make a move to do something to close a loophole in campaign
finance law and you want to moan about it? Did you read the article?