Defendant Nicholas Popoalii, by and through his counsel, Edward W. Swanson, and the United States, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Tarek J. Helou, hereby stipulate to continue the defendant's sentencing hearing, currently scheduled for December 9, 2009 at 2:30 p.m., until December 16, 2009 at 2:30 p.m. Counsel for the United States is unexpectedly unavailable on December 9, 2009. Counsel for the United States spoke with U.S. Probation Officer J.D. Woods about changing the date of the defendant's sentencing. Officer Woods stated that he has no objection to the requested change.

SO STIPULATED:

DATED: November 4, 2009

For the reasons stated above, the Court hereby continues the defendant's sentencing, currently set for December 9, 2009 at 2:30 p.m., until December 16, 2009 at 2:30 p.m. Given the number of matters currently scheduled for December 16, 2009, the Court's calendar will not accommodate this sentencing on that date. Accordingly, the request to continue is hereby DENIED.

If counsel for the United States cannot arrange for another attorney from his office to appear for him on December 9, 2009, counsel shall file a renewed stipulation, advising the Court as to such circumstance and the reason(s) therefor, and proposing a suitable alternative date after consulting with the Clerk of the Court.

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.