About Me

Dr. Clyde Winters, has taught in the Chicago Public Schools for 36 years. He has taught Education and Linguistic Courses at Saint Xavier University-Chicago. As a teacher in the Chicago Public Schools Dr. Winters wrote State Standards in the 1990's for the Chicago Public School system and Common Core State Standards for Social Studies. He also wrote the 6th Grade World History Lesson Plans used in the CPS in 2000.

Haber at al
speculate that there were several migrations of Eurasians rom Arabia, into Chad beginning around 7200 ya, which led
to the origin of R1b-V88, a major y-Chromosome in much of Africa.. These
authors wrote:

“We detected
the earliest Eurasian migrations to Africa in the Laal-speaking people, an
isolated language group of fewer than 800 speakers who inhabit southern Chad.
We estimate that mixture occurred 4,750–7,200 ya, thus after the Neolithic
transition in the Near East, a period characterized by exponential growth in
human population size. Environmental changes during this period (which possibly
triggered the Neolithic transition) also facilitated human migrations. The
African Humid Period, for example, was a humid phase across North Africa that
peaked 6,000–9,000 ya37 and biogeographically connected Africa to Eurasia,
facilitating human movement across these regions.38 In Chad, we found a Y
chromosome lineage (R1b-V88) that we estimate emerged during the same period
5,700–7,300 ya (Figure 3B). The closest related Y chromosome groups today are
widespread in Eurasia and have been previously associated with human expansions
to Europe.39, 40 We estimate that the Eurasian R1b lineages initially diverged
7,300–9,400 ya, at the time of the Neolithic expansions. However, we found that
the African and Eurasian R1b lineages diverged 17,900–23,000 ya, suggesting
that genetic structure was already established between the groups who expanded
to Europe and Africa. R1b-V88 was previously found in Central and West Africa
and was associated with a mid-Holocene migration of Afro-asiatic speakers
through the central Sahara into the Lake Chad Basin.8 In the populations we
examined, we found R1b in the Toubou and Sara, who speak Nilo-Saharan
languages, and also in the Laal people, who speak an unclassified language.
This suggests that R1b penetrated Africa independently of the Afro-asiatic
language spread or passed to other groups through admixture.”

This statement is contradictory. How
could Chadian R1b-V88 emerge 5,700 ya, and R1b-M269 emerge7,300 ya—but—“the African
and Eurasian lineages coalesced 17,900–23,000 ya”. The statement is contradictory because how
could V-88 and M-269 coalesce 23,000 ya, when they did not allegedly emerge until 11-13,000 years after their proposed coalesce
time.

In addition,
to an incongruent coalesce time, there is no archaeological evidence for migration
back into Africa 7,300 ya. we do see evidence of Africans migrating into the Levant.
These Africans were Natufians.

By 13,000 BC, according to J.D. Clark said that the Natufians were
collecting grasses which later became domesticated crops in Southwest Asia. In Palestine the
Natufians established intensive grass collection. Ehret and Wendorf, have observed that the Natufians used the Ibero-Maurusian
tool industry and spread agriculture throughout Nubia into the Red Sea.

The Natufians practiced evulsion of the incisors the same as Bantu
people and inhabitants of the Saharan fringes. The modern civilizations of the
Middle East were created by the Natufians. Since the Natufians came from Nubia,
they can not be classified as Eurasians.

Trenton W. Holliday, tested the hypothesis that if
modern Africans had dispersed into the Levant from Africa, "tropically adapted
hominids" would be represented in
the archaeological history of the Lavant, especially in relation to the
Qafzeh-Skhul hominids. This researcher found that the Qafzeh-Skhul hominids
(20,000-10,000),were assigned to the Sub-Saharan population, along with the
Natufians samples (4000 BP). Holliday also found African fauna in the area.

Holliday confirmed his hypothesis that the replacement of the Neanderthal
people were Sub-Saharan Africans. This shows that there were no Eurasian types in
the Middle East between 20,000-4,000ya, when Haber et al speculated Y-chromosomes
R-V88 and R-M269 coalesced .

Moreover, we clearly see the continuity
between African culture from Nubia to the Levant.This view is supported by the Natufians who originated in Africa, and took the Ibero-Maurusian tools into Europe, North Africa and the Middle East.

Holliday wrote: "The current study
demonstrates African-like affinities in the body shape of the Qafzeh-Skhul
hominids. This finding is consistent with craniofacial evidence (Brace 1996)
and with zooarchaeological data indicating the presence of African fauna at
Qafzeh (Rabinovich and Tchernov 1995; Tchernov 1988, 1992)" (p.64). The
continuity in the spread of Sub-Saharan fauna, flora and physical type in the
Levant between 4000-23,000 ya, means that R1 more than likely originated in Africa, instead of Eurasia. Haber et al (2016) is invalid and lacks archaeogenetic evidence to support their conclusions.

In West and Central Africa populations exhibit extremely
high frequencies (61% to 95%) of R1b1-P25, or V88. In contrast, two of the three Southeast African
Bantu populations genotyped in this study, display polymorphic levels of M269 in Central Mozambique 9% and Maputo 1%.

Rowold et al, speculate that M269 was introduced into
Southeast Africa by Arabs or Western Europeans.

R1 originated in Africa and spread into Eurasia. I
specifically stated the frequency of R1 among African populations throughout my
2011 paper.

Many Sub Saharan Africans carry R1b1b2. Wood et al (2009) found that Khoisan (2.2%) and Niger-Congo
(0.4%) speakers carried the R-M269 y-chromosome. The Khoisan also carry RM343
(R1b) and M 198 (R1a1) (Naidoo et al., 2010) The Gonzalez et al article found that 10 out of 19 subjects in the study
carried R1b1-P25 or M269. This is highly significant because it indicates that
53% of the R1 carriers in this study were M269, this finding is further proof
of the widespread nature of this so-called Eurasian genes in Africa among
populations that have not mated with Europeans.