Of course I have seen all three and have analysed the second two in detail on my website. I have also analysed the first one considerably but not published my results.

In my opinion, the first and third offer some of the best circumstantial evidence for thylacines on the mainland in the 1900s. No video or photo will ever constitute proof, but they help you know where to look 🙂

The second is a dingo or other dog with mange.

]]>By: cryp-23http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36540
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:45:16 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-36540I really like the first one i think I can see the stripes and the way it’s holding its tail makes me think Thylacine.

There’s no way number two is a Thylacine because I can’t make out stripes and if you pause the clip at the right time you can see a flurry of a bushy tail something Thylacines just don’t have.

I don’t think number three is a Thylacine because its tail is too “floppy” when Thylacine run they hold there tails much stiffer, and I can make out something that might be stripes but I think it’s just do to the quality of the video I think number three is a fox.

]]>By: bashfulbutterflyhttp://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36539
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:57:55 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-36539The first video could be either a Thylacine or a Lion. I’m not particulary sure which because the quality is horrid. However, the shape of the head, the rounded ears, and the firm tail shows promise.

The second video is incredibly stupid. Not a Hyena by any means, but looks like either a dog or a dingo with some sort of illness. The ears are far too pointed to be a Thylacine which obviously had short and round ears.

The third video I think is definitely a Thylacine. I think it’s an amazing video. In stills of it, it obviously does not run anything like a fox nor a dog. The tail is held straight out behind it, just like the Thylacine. Regardless of the poor quality, if the stills are brightened, you can make out some very faint striping along the animal. I’d say the third is the best by far.

]]>By: easternbigfoot2http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36538
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:47:11 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-36538On the last one I see the stripes on the hind legs
]]>By: YourPTR!http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36537
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:37:49 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-36537One of the arguments i’ve heard used to discredit the first video is that it was actually filmed in Africa and it shows a female lion with a cub in its mouth and that’s why the video is so short and why the person filming didn’t zoom in because it would have become immediately obvious what the subject of the film was. This is just a theory, I don’t know if there is any truth in it or not but it is worth considering. Sometimes when I view the first video I can kinda make out something in the animals mouth in the first part like it was carrying something, this doesn’t prove it’s a lion with a cub of course and in the last part I don’t see that at all. Could have been sliced I suppose.
]]>By: CrimsonFox79http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36536
Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:07:11 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-36536First video – Not a thylacine by any means. Looks like a lion cub to me. The muzzle is broad and thick, and the ears are very round, and the tail is very thin. It also has the movement of a lion or similar wild feline. Nothing thylacine in those features.

Second video – Some kind of dog with mange.

Third video – probably the most convincing. The tail still seems too skinny though, but it could just be the way it looks from the poor quality.

]]>By: Mnynameshttp://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36535
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:09:48 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-36535Personally, I find the first video a bit suspect, not for the length of the footage, but the appearance of the animal. The legs seem too short to me, and the tail and snout just don’t seem quite right to be a Thylacine.

The second one, I agree, is likely a known animal with mange.

The third is by far the best footage. The gait is unusual, the morphology is right, and it even has stripes. Like PG, it is an old film that has never been conclusively debunked.

]]>By: Atticushttp://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36534
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:33:58 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-36534The first one looks very promising.
]]>By: kolobehttp://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36533
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:46:09 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-365331st video is promising, the 2nd one looks like a feral dog or dingo/dog hybrid, it has similar traits to the african wild dog except that this thing is showing serious starvation and sickness pointing to a feral or abandoned dog, the 3rd one is also probably a feral dog. We see a fair amount of feral dogs on our farms and they all show similar traits as seen in the 2nd and 3rd video.
]]>By: crypto42http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/comment-page-1/#comment-36531
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:59:18 +0000http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/thylacine-vids/#comment-365311st one is probably a Thylacine, 2nd looks like a starving hairless African Wild dog and 3rd looks like somebody’s pet dog running on a driveway.
]]>