Welcome to my blog---an eyes-open, no-holds-barred exploration of Western and Eastern spirituality, mindfulness, philosophy and literature. A member of the Australian and New Zealand Mental Health Association, I lectured at the NSW Institute of Psychiatry to mental health workers for 14 years and at the University of Technology, Sydney to law students for 16 years. My interests include metaphysics, the psychology of religion, transformative ritual, mythology and addiction recovery.

Friday, January 29, 2016

I am an iconoclast and a heretic. I reject all
claims and assertions of supernatural religion and authority. In the words of
Thomas Paine, my own mind is my own church. So, it is no surprise that I have a
soft spot—no, not that one—for other iconoclasts, heretics and freethinkers. Ikkyū
[pictured left] was one such man. He was a 15th century Japanese ZenBuddhist
monk. He not only revitalized Zen but also had a profound influence upon the Japanese tea ceremony.

Now, Zen has always sought to cut through the crap so as to arrive at a
direct, immediate and largely intuitive experience of life, but Ikkyū’s radical approach was really something to behold. He was an iconoclast extraordinaire.
In any field of any endeavour we need the man or woman who says, ‘But the Emperor has no clothes!’ That is why I’ve always loved the American comedian Groucho Marx, who spent his entire life deflating the pompous, the pretentious and the
phony. We need more people like that.

Here’s the second most profound
piece of metaphysical wisdom---there is nowhere to go. I’ve told you this story
before, but I’ll tell it again. A
young man is on his way home. He comes to the banks of a wide, and very deep,
river. He finds he is on the ‘wrong’ side of the river. The river is fast
flowing, with numerous rapids. There is no bridge or other means available for
crossing the river. The young man sees an elderly Buddhist monk standing on the
other side of the river, so he yells over to the monk, ‘Oh, wise one, can you
tell me how to get to the other side of this river?’ The monk ponders for a moment,
looks up and down the river, and yells back, ‘My son, you are on the other
side.’ Yes, wherever we
want to 'go', we are already there. The young man wants to get to
the other side of the river, only to be told that he is already on the other
side of the river.To reach the other side
of the river is to see that this very side here is the
other side. When there is no separation in our mind between one side and the
other, then in that very moment we are one with the very livingness of
life flowing through us and all things.

The author at a Japanese tea ceremony.

And the first most profound piece
of metaphysical wisdom is this. Well, it follows directly from the first. It is
this---truth is right where you are. People strive for worldly success and for
the approval and admiration of others but those things will not take you away
from yourself—not for long, anyway. Truth—also known as reality and life—is right
where you are. All we need to do is to see things as they really are in all
their directness and immediacy. That’s where mindfulness comes in.

The folly and blind hope of supernatural religion is that we
are going to live forever in one place or another, with one such place
supposedly being more attractive than the other. I do not believe that. We come
from dust and to dust we return. Earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust.
In one sense, we remain part of life’s self-expression—for life cannot other
than be. That, as I see it, is the true meaning of those words, ‘The spirit returns to God who gave it’ (Ec 12:7), but
I am in absolutely no doubt that at
the point of death our consciousness as a separate, thinking, feeling
individual together with what we call our personality, comes to an abrupt and very final end. If you want to believe
otherwise, that is your prerogative. As I see it, we are, in the words of Ikkyū,
like ‘vanishing dew’, a ‘passing apparition’, a ‘sudden flash’. In the words of
Shakespeare, taken from what is my favourite play of his, The Tempest:

… … … … We are such stuffAs dreams
are made on; and our little lifeIs
rounded with a sleep.

Ikkyū is, however, saying more than that. He is
making a comment about how we should regard ourselves. Most of us take
ourselves far too seriously, thinking that we will be remembered long after we
are gone. A few of us will live on longer in the memories of others. As George Eliot expressed it in her poem 'The Choir Invisible':

Oh, may I join the
choir invisible
Of those immortal dead who live again
In minds made better by their presence; live
In pulses stirred to generosity,
In deeds of daring rectitude, in scorn
For miserable aims that end with self,
In thoughts sublime that pierce the night like stars,
And with their mild persistence urge men's search
To vaster issues.

That is very sweet sentiment but the plain and simple truth of the matter is this---most of
us will be completely forgotten in two or three generations. How's that for a reality check?

Lake Ashi, Kanagawa
Prefecture, Honshū, Japan.

Photo taken by the
author.

Ikkyū had much to say about so-called sacred
texts. Now, don’t get me wrong. Most sacred texts contain some helpful advice
on the art of living—along with a lot of unhelpful and divisive nonsense. The
task is to separate the wheat from the staff. Listen to what Ikkyū has to say
about sacred texts:

Studying texts and stiff meditation can make you lose
your Original Mind.A solitary tune by a fisherman, though, can be an
invaluable treasure.Dusk rain on the river, the moon peeking in and
out of the clouds;Elegant beyond words, he chants his songs night
after night.

… … … …

I've burnt all the holy pages I used to carrybut poems flare in my heart.

The concept of ‘original mind’ in Zen is a most important
one. Imagine for a moment that you had not been brought up in the faith or
belief system of your parents or particular culture. Indeed, imagine that you
had not been inculcated in any way to believe this or that about life. You
would then have a mind which was entirely culturally free and unconditioned.
Such is the nature of your ‘original mind’. Is it possible to have such a mind
today? Well, people such as J. Krishnamurti say that it is indeed possible for
the mind to decondition itself entirely. For my part, I am still working on the
task.

I love what Ikkyū has to say about poetry. My
late father used to say that there was more wisdom in theRubáiyát of OmarKhayyám
than in The Bible. Maybe. Maybe not. I think Dad was telling me more about what
he didn’t or couldn’t believe as opposed to which work contained more wisdom.
After all, The Bible contains some great poetry as well, and the Book of Ecclesiastes
has a similar tone to much of its writing as the Rubáiyát, although the latter does seem to be promoting a more earthy approach
to life and its fleeting pleasures.

Take a good look
at the religious fanatic. It does not matter which religion he or she is
fanatical about. The fanatic has completely lost their original mind. He or she
can no longer see and appreciate things as they really are. Everything gets
filtered through, and distorted by, their belief system. Yes, the same thing
can happen to the atheist and nonbeliever. However, Ikkyū is making
the point that any study of sacred or spiritual books, as well as meditative
practices, can result in your losing your original mind. One good way of
deconditioning your mind, and returning bit by bit to your original mind, is to
spend more time communing with nature. That is very good advice.

Well, I haven’t burnt all the ‘holy pages’ in my
home library. There are still hundreds and hundreds of books on religion and
spirituality, as well as on many other subjects, on my bookshelves. However, I
have burnt something, and that something is this---the mindset that says, ‘This, you must believe’, ‘The Bible says
…’, ‘God has spoken His final word in …’, and ‘There is only one way … .’

You are never lost when you know the way home. And
where is ‘home’? Well, it is right here, where you are now. Look around you.
Look within you. What do you see? What do you feel? It is life. You are an
expression of the spirit of life. That life did not begin with your birth. It will
not end with your death. Recover your original mind, and start seeing and
experiencing things as they really are.

Professor
Waters said that child stress is becoming increasingly widespread with 31 per
cent of Australian children feeling ‘very stressed,’ and 40 per cent feeling
that they worry too much.

‘This stress
and tension often leads to children having physical symptoms such as headaches,
abdominal pain and difficulty sleeping,’ Professor Waters said. ‘We know from
past research that when a child is stressed they draw on theirparentsfor support, and that their parents
have the power to diminish or increase their children'sstress levels.
We now have strong evidence that children benefit when they're parents are more
mindful of their emotions, and pause before they react with anger, stress or
frustration.’

Professor
Waters said mindfulness can aid emotional support by helping parents to
regulate their own attention and emotion.

‘Mindfulness is more than just a “buzzword”.
It's about being present and giving each task your fullattention,’
said Professor Waters. ‘Taking the time to listen and understand your child's
problems, promotes trust and emotional connection leading to a richer and more
authentic relationship.

‘It also
teaches children how to be open and aware of the whole situation including
their own thoughts, feelings and sensations, which in turn makes them less
stressed.’

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please read the
Terms of Use and Disclaimer. The information provided on or linked to this
blog is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or
treatment. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from
your medical practitioner or other qualified health provider because of
something you have read on this blog or elsewhere. For immediate advice or
support call (in Australia) Lifeline on 13 1 1 14 or Kids Helpline on 1800 55
1800. For information, advice and referral on mental illness contact (in
Australia) the SANE Helpline on 1800 18 SANE (7263) go online via sane.org. In other countries
call the relevant mental health care emergency hotline or simply dial your
emergency assistance telephone number and ask for help.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Zeros -- that is, persons who are nonentities
-- are not born. They are made. Many are almost entirely self-made. Of course, society plays a significant role in the creation of a zero. Are you
a zero? Do you live with one? Do you work for one? (It's always easier to see the 'zero factor' in others.)Of course, in
truth no one is really a zero. Each human being is a person of inherent and infinite worth and dignity -- a person among persons -- and a vital part of the interdependent
web of all existence. However, many people think and act as if they were zeros,
and in so doing they tend to become zeros over time. That's a very sad state of affairs.Now, one of my favourite playwrights is Elmer Rice (1892-1967) [pictured right]. He was also a screenwriter, novelist, essayist, theatre owner, producer, director and activist. Previously, he had studied law and was admitted to the Bar in 1913. In the late 1930s he organized the New York office of the Federal Theatre Project, the Roosevelt Administration's New Deal program to employ out-of-work theatre people. He was also a founding member of the American Civil Liberties Union, cofounded the Playwrights' Company, a theatrical production company, and served as president of the Dramatists Guild of America. Known for his use of experimental technique, Rice is often credited with having been the first to employ on stage the motion-picture
technique of flashbacks in the court-room drama On Trial. He also wrote an autobiography entitled Minority Report (1963) as well as The Living Theatre (1959), being a collection of essays on the theatre.

Rice, who was greatly influenced by expressionism, wrote over 50 full-length plays, as well as a number of screenplays, teleplays, one-act plays, novels, short stories and articles. His major plays include the Pulitzer Prize-winning Street Scene, a gritty, realistic portrait of life
in a New York tenement block in the late 1920s, the equally gritty Counsellor-at-Law, being a powerful drama
about a Jewish lawyer whose past comes back to haunt him, The Subway, in which a woman is driven to suicide as a result of the corrosive effects of puritanical morality and guilt after having been victimized by an artist, and We, the People, being a powerful indictment of Depression-era social injustice as well as racial prejudice. I’ve already discussed another of
his well-known plays, the romantic comedy-modernist psychoanalytic fantasy Dream Girl, in a couple of previous posts [see here and here]. In this post I will discuss the tragicomicThe Adding Machine, which is a modern
classic. (Yes, I know that’s an oxymoron.) John Russell Taylor, in The Penguin Dictionary of the Theatre(London:
Penguin Books, 1966), writes that The
Adding Machine was ‘one of the first plays to adapt expressionist
techniques to the English-speaking stage’ (p 228).

By way of background, in 1915 Rice, a realistic leftist but not a member of any political party, had made a visit to the Ford Motor Company plant in Detroit. The visit apparently left a lasting impression on him
-- mainly a negative one, it seems -- and is said to have been the direct
inspiration for The Adding Machine.
One thing is clear. The Adding Machine,
a ‘dark’ play written by Rice in 1922, ‘presents the universe as a heartless
corporate enterprise in which human beings are raw material’ (Trevor R Giffiths
and Carole Woddis, The Back Stage Theater Guide, New York: Back Stage Books, 1991, p 307). In his writings the always politically progressive Rice
exposed the shallowness and selfishness of the American dream while rejecting
as unrealistic the notion of a socialist utopia. He saw the theatre as a platform that could be used to exhort much-needed social reform. Disliking commercial Broadway, Rice once wrote that the Broadway stage need not 'be devoted exclusively to gags, wisecraks, tap-dancing, knockabout farce, fustian romance and polite adulteries', and railed against church-dicated morality, censorship, theatre critics, militarism and resistance to political change.

The Adding
Machine
sums up the human condition pretty well, at least the condition sadly ‘lived’
by all too many people. The play’s protagonist Zero, a white-collar slave, is
quite literally a … zero. A cipher. A nonentity. A nobody. He says, 'I'm just a regular guy like anybody else.' A sex-starved
accountant, he lives a dull, dreary, dehumanized, mindless and conditioned
life, adding numbers at a desk in an office at a faceless company, performing
the same operation over and over, day in and day out, for 51 weeks of the year. Hardworking and dedicated, Zero is exploited
by his heartless, unappreciative capitalist boss, and his life at home with a constantly nagging
wife, who seems to get a perverse pleasure out of telling Zero that he’s a
failure, is pretty awful as well. ‘Sittin’ for twenty-five years on the same
chair, addin’ up figures. What about bein’ store-manager? I guess you forgot
about that, didn’t you? … You ain’t much to be proud of’, says the wife.

Zero’s existential angst and self-blame are
palpable, but he has little understanding of the hopelessness of his condition
and is unable to learn from his mistakes. His only pleasure in life, at least
for a time, was in peeping at an undressed prostitute in a room across the
tenement airshaft, but even that pleasure goes after Zero’s wife forces him to
report the woman to the police. Sic
transit gloria mundi. However, lest we start feeling too sorry for
Zero, he is very much an anti-hero. He is a racist, a misogynist and an
anti-Semite. He may be trapped in a small machine-dominated world, but he is very
much trapped by his own limited, negative thinking, lack of vision and general
state of mindlessness. How many of us are like Zero? Ponder on that thought for
a moment.

After 25 years of faithful service to the
company -- he never missed a single day of work -- Zero ends up stabbing his
boss to death with a bill spike after being told that he was being fired and
replaced by, yes, a machine (‘efficiency must be the first consideration … no
other alternative .. efficiency—economy—business—business—BUSINESS’, said the
boss immediately before his despatch).Zero is
tried, found guilty -- he admits his guilt but blames the boss as well as ‘them
lawyers’ and ‘the figgers in my head’ -- and is duly executed. He is sent to
the Elysian Fields which turns out to be such a ‘pleasant place’ that, as an
after-life, it is almost as insufferable as life on earth. Zero is put to work on a celestial adding machine. Worse is yet to
follow, for Zero is told that he is a waste of space, so his soul will be sent
back to earth to be reused. Put bluntly, the greatly embittered Zero will have to ‘do it all again’
(shades of Friedrich Nietzsche’s ‘eternal return’). The play ends with Zero following a very
attractive girl appropriately named Hope (who may not actually exist) off stage.‘Oh, Hope! Wait for me! I’ll be
right with you! I’m on my way!’ says Zero. The stage direction says, 'He stumbles out eagerly.' Ha! Like so many of us, Zero stumbles his way through life, forever clutching at a vain hope -- actually, an illusion -- of a lasting and satisfying pleasure.

A photo of the original stage production of The Adding Machine.

The influence of expressionism is obvious.

There are some wonderful lines in the play.
Take, for example, this exchange between Zero and Lieutenant Charles, who is the boss of the Elysian Fields, that
occurs near the end of the play:

CHARLES. You'll be a baby again—a bald, red-faced
little animal, and then you'll go through it all again. There'll be millions of
others like you—all with their mouths open, squalling for food. And then when
you get a little older you'll begin to learn things—and you'll learn all the
wrong things and learn them all in the wrong way. You'll eat the wrong food and
wear the wrong clothes and you'll live in swarming dens where there's no light
and no air! You'll learn to be a liar and a bully and a braggart and a coward
and a sneak. You'll learn to fear the sunlight and to hate beauty. By that time
you'll be ready for school. There they'll tell you the truth about a great many
things that you don't give a damn about and they'll tell you lies about all the
things you ought to know—and about all the things you want to know they'll tell
you nothing at all. When you get through you'll be equipped for your life-work.
You'll be ready to take a job.

ZERO. [Eagerly] What'll my job be?
Another adding machine?

CHARLES. Yes. But not one of these antiquated
adding ma­chines. It will be a superb, super-hyper-adding ma­chine, as far from
this old piece of junk as you are from God. It will be something to make you
sit up and take notice, that adding machine. It will be an adding machine which
will be installed in a coal mine and which will record the individual output of
each miner. As each miner down in the lower galleries takes up a shovelful of
coal, the impact of his shovel will automatically set in motion a graphite
pencil in your gallery. The pencil will make a mark in white upon a blackened,
sensitized drum. Then your work comes in. With the great toe of your right foot
you release a lever which focuses a violet ray on the drum. The ray playing
upon and through the white mark, falls upon a selenium cell which in turn sets
the keys of the adding apparatus in motion. In this way the indi­vidual output
of each miner is recorded without any human effort except the slight pressure
of the great toe of your right foot.

CHARLES. Some machine is right. It will be the
culmination of human effort—the final triumph of the evolutionary process. For
millions of years the nebulous gases swirled in space. For more millions of
years the gases cooled and then through inconceivable ages they hard­ened into
rocks. And then came life. Floating green things on the waters that covered the
earth. More millions of years and a step upward—an animate or­ganism in the
ancient slime. And so on—step by step, down through the ages—a gain here, a
gain there—the mollusc, the fish, the reptile, them mammal, man! And all so
that you might sit in the gallery of a coal mine and operate the
super-hyper-adding machine with the great toe of your right foot!

ZERO. Well, then—I ain't so bad, after all.

CHARLES. You're a failure, Zero, a failure. A waste
product. A slave to a contraption of steel and iron. The ani­mal's instincts,
but not his strength and skill. The animal's appetites, but not his unashamed
indulgence of them. True, you move and eat and digest and excrete and
reproduce. But any microscopic organism can do as much. Well—time's up! Back
you go—back to your sunless groove—the raw material of slums and wars—the ready
prey of the first jingo or demagogue or political adventurer who takes the
trouble to play upon your ignorance and credulity and provincialism. You poor,
spineless, brainless boob—I’m sorry for you!

Another photo of the original stage production of The Adding Machine.Once again, we see expressionism in action.

‘You’re a
failure, Zero, a failure … [a] waste product … [a] poor, spineless, brainless
boob.’ As I said, Zero is very much an anti-hero. After he’s told by Lieutenant
Charles what is going to happen to him, Zero cries out, ‘What did you tell me
so much for? Couldn’t you just let me go, thinkin’ everythin’ was goin’ to be
all right?’ Zero is like so many people who prefer the supposed bliss of
ignorance, delusion and conditioning to the light of truth and wisdom. Very
sad. Elmer Rice would have us—wake up … and get real! However, for the Zeros of
this world it’s a case of … plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

The Indian
spiritual teacher J. Krishnamurti railed against conditioning and its effects.
Conditioning, in Rice’s words, means that we ‘begin to learn things’, ‘learn
all the wrong things’, and ‘learn them all in the wrong way’. It means, again
quoting Rice, being told ‘the truth about a great many things that you don't
give a damn about’ while being told ‘lies about all the things you ought to
know’. It means becoming ‘equipped for your life-work’ and being ready to ‘take
a job’. In the process, we lose so much of ourselves and become slaves to
others, to machines, and to technology. We cease thinking for ourselves. We
become normopaths, but the truth is we are hardly normal at all.

However, in order to live
mindfully we must let go of our conditioning, that is, our many beliefs,
dogmas, opinions, speculations, prejudices and predilections about how life supposedly
is or ought to be. Conditioning is the past, and locks us into the past. When
we are trapped in the past, we are no longer present to life as it unfolds from
one moment to the next. That’s not the end of it. Conditioning represents other
persons’ understanding of reality or truth, it is not truth itself. We need to
see things-as-they-really-are in all
their directness and immediacy, and that requires a deconditioned and free but
responsible mind. The good news is that the mind can indeed free itself from
its own conditioning, but first you must be prepared to let go of the
conditioning spoken of by the character Charles in The Adding Machine.

Some of Zero’s last words before
his execution are these --- ‘Suppose you was me, now … Suppose you was me---.’ Don’t
be a Zero, a failure, a spineless, brainless boob, a normopath. Live mindfully--and
freely. Refuse to be trapped in someone else’s world or one of your own making.

The
book presents emerging research on the effectiveness of mindfulness methods in
reducing behavioural problems associated with ASD in children and synthesizes current research and theories on the therapeutic
uses of mindfulness, specifically for people living with developmental
disabilities.

In
addition, the book examines a promising new study in which mothers of children
with ASD learn mindfulness techniques for their own use and are then trained to
teach the methods to their children. The book concludes with a report of
post-study findings and a discussion of practical and methodological issues
regarding mindfulness interventions for ASD.

In
short, mindfulness meditation has been shown to be effective for reducing
aggression, both physical and verbal, as well as deviant sexual arousal, for
quitting smoking and losing weight in people with ASD conditions, and for
alleviating anxiety, depression, and stress-related physiological symptoms.
These effects were either assessed against the condition of participants before
their mindfulness training or individuals with similar disabilities who did not
learn mindfulness.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please read the
Terms of Use and Disclaimer. The information provided on or linked to this
blog is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or
treatment. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from
your medical practitioner or other qualified health provider because of
something you have read on this blog or elsewhere. For immediate advice or
support call (in Australia) Lifeline on 13 1 1 14 or Kids Helpline on 1800 55
1800. For information, advice and referral on mental illness contact (in
Australia) the SANE Helpline on 1800 18 SANE (7263) go online via sane.org. In other countries
call the relevant mental health care emergency hotline or simply dial your
emergency assistance telephone number and ask for help.

Monday, January 4, 2016

Over
the years I have been called upon to commit to memory a speech, poem or
monologue from a play. On a couple of occasions I have acted in plays where I
needed to learn whole lines of variable length and complexity. I have never
found this an easy task, and I must confess that I find the task even more
difficult as I get older.

I
used to learn the material off by rote. That method sometimes worked, but it
failed me on one memorable occasion that I can recall. I had to learn a very
long portion of a piece of Masonic ritual. The piece was in three parts. I
spent months learning the material line by line, obviously beginning with the
first line, and when I had committed that to memory, I went on to the second
line, and then the third, and so on. In my mind, the second sentence had become
‘attached’ to the first, and the third ‘attached’ to the second, and so on,
right to the very last line. Now, on the night I was to deliver the speech, I was
told that three people would share the delivery of the speech, and that I would
deliver only the final third part of the speech. Well, I didn’t know where to
begin. Not being able to start with the first line, I stumbled on almost every
line and had to be prompted. It was most embarrassing. So much for learning one
line after the other by rote. However, if that method works well for you, use
it.

Here’s
some philosophy that, in my opinion, is worth its weight in gold. It says much
about life as well as linguistics. Now, David Hume (1711-1776) [pictured left] was
a Scottish philosopher of very great renown. He was an empiricist who saw the
world as a continuum -- actually, more of a drift -- of ideas. Think of your
speech, poem or play lines as a drift of ideas, one after the other, for such
is the workings of the human mind – one thought, feeling or sensation after
another. After all, the primary purpose of words is to convey ideas. Get into
the ‘look’, ‘feel’ and ‘sound’ of the idea—and make the idea your own. Pay
attention to the idea above all else. Once the idea has been committed to
memory, then you can direct your attention to the words themselves.

Now,
no matter how tenuous the connection, there is always some sort of connection (‘association’)
between one idea and the next. This is what Hume had to say about the matter:

It is evident that there is a principle of connection between the
different thoughts or ideas of the mind, and that in their appearance to the
memory or imagination, they introduce each other with a certain degree of
method and regularity. (AnEnquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1784),
I:I:3.)

The
author of the material has given some thought to the connections between one
idea and the next. This is not a matter of chance but rather deliberate determination.
Says Hume, ‘Were ideas entirely loose and unconnected, chance alone would join
them’ (A Treatise of Human Nature,
I:I:4). One or more lines of your material encapsulate an idea -- perhaps more
than one idea -- so commit the idea to your memory. Then proceed to note, and
then commit to memory, the connection between one idea and the next, and the
one thereafter, and so on. According to Hume, ‘the same simple ideas … fall
regularly into complex ones’, for such is life. Life is simply the continuum of
one moment after another. For the public speaker or actor, the important thing,
insofar as the succession of ideas is concerned, is to decipher, and then
commit to memory, the ‘bond of union among them, some associating quality by
which one idea naturally introduces another’ (Treatise, I:I:4). Association is the uniting principle, but it ‘is
not to be considered as an inseparable connection ... Nor yet are we to
conclude that without it the mind cannot join two ideas ... But we are only to
regard it as a gentle force, which commonly prevails’ (Treatise, I:I:4). So, for Hume association is in the nature of a
‘gentle force’ which develops from what he termed ‘original qualities of human
nature’ and which ‘point[s] out to everyone those simple ideas which are most
proper to be united into a complex one’ (Treatise,
I:I:4).

Let's now apply the above mentioned ideas to the task of learning a speech, poem or
play. First, read, then re-read, then re-read again, the material to be
learned. Get a ‘feel’ for the material as
a whole. The ‘secret’ is to get into the mind of the author … and to think, feel and act from there. When it comes to a play, you need to do more, that
is, to get into the mind of the character you’re playing such that the ideas --
in terms of the lines spoken -- become your
ideas. Become, at least for a time, the character you’re playing. Their
thoughts become your thoughts (but not necessarily in ‘real’ life). In time, as
you come to identify more and more with the character you’re playing, the
ideas, and the associations between one idea and another, will become almost
automatic, natural and spontaneous. Get interested in the writer of the
material (in the case of, say, a poem) and the character you’re playing (in the
case of a play). The more you are interested, the easier it becomes to maintain
attention, awareness and concentration … and the easier it becomes to remember.

Never
forget this. First, the idea -- that
is, the form of the words – then the substance, that is, the words themselves. Not only is there an
association between one idea and the next idea, there is also an association between
an idea itself and the words that the author has chosen to give expression to
that idea. The last mentioned association is especially useful for you, the speaker or actor, for it serves as
your mnemonic. (A mnemonic is any learning technique
that aids information retention in the human memory.) So, learn the ideas as opposed to the words. This is
the good advice of the internationally renowned Australian theatrical and opera
director Gale Edwards [pictured right]. When it comes to your lines, look for
what are known as ‘key lines’ – the lines that are most central to the idea or
image being communicated. The key lines will serve as an anchor in your mind to
which the other lines in your material are attached.

Where does mindfulness come into all this? Well, it already
has, for mindfulness is the watchful, receptive,
deliberate, and purposeful presence
of bare attention to, and choiceless awareness of, the content of the action
(both internal and external) of the present moment ... from one moment to the
next.The word ‘presence’ refers to both physical
and psychological presence -- of you, your body, and your mind. 'Watchful'
presence means that there you are very much aware that you're aware---or not
aware as the case may be---of what is going on in and about you,
and this alert and open awareness, attention and ongoing observation makes use
of all your senses as well as your mind and proceeds deliberately, purposefully,
intentionally and receptively on
your part.

I use the word ‘content’
because it is ‘content’ -- of ideas, images, words and actions, all of which
are occurrences in time and space -- of which the speaker or actor must be
aware, and to which they must give clear, focused and single-minded attention
and concentration.The
content of the speaker or actor’s awareness will be both internal (eg thoughts, feelings, mental images, as well as bodily
sensations and the like) and external
(sounds, sights, actions, etc).

Now, what do we mean by
‘bare attention’? Well, bare attention falls short of naming, labelling,
judging, analysing, interpreting, approving, condemning, and so forth. In his
book The Heart of Buddhist Meditation (San Francisco CA:
Weiser Books, [1954] 1965, p 30) -- a truly wonderful book on insight
meditation (mindfulness) -- the monk and teacher Nyanaponika Thera [pictured left] defines, or rather describes, bare attention in these words:

Bare attention is the
clear and single-minded awareness of what actually happens to us
and in us, at the successive moments of perception. It is
called ‘bare’, because it attends just to the bare facts of a perception as
presented either through the five physical senses or through the mind which,
for Buddhist thought, constitutes the sixth sense. When attending to that
sixfold sense impression, attention or mindfulness is kept to a bare
registering of the facts observed, without reacting to them by deed, speech or
by mental comment which may be one of self-reference (like, dislike, etc),
judgement or reflection. … [original emphasis]

Bare attention does not
mean minimal attention. On the contrary, it means total and unadulterated attention
to the action of the moment – without allowing yourself to be deflected by
extraneous matters. Bare attention is needed not only when learning one’s lines
but also in delivering them. If you are an actor, you also need to have the
same level of attention to the action of the play as it unfolds. And the phrase
‘choiceless awareness’? Well, awareness is ‘choiceless’ when there is no preference,
and no prejudice -- that is, no judgment or selectiveness -- as respects the
content of one’s awareness. Ordinarily, we tend to be aware of some things but
not others.

Lucille Ball in a touring production of the play Dream Girl, 1947-48

Now, take these lines from
the play Dream Girl (New York:
Dramatists Play Service, 1945, pp 69-70) by Elmer Rice. I have used different
colours to highlight various connections -- groupings and chains of thought of
like character, rhythm, mood and feeling -- in the drift of ideas and images as
well as some connections within a single idea or image.

CLARK. Because dreaming
is easy and life
is hard. Because
when you dream,
you make your own rules,
but when you try to do something, the rules are made for you by the limitations
of your own nature and the shape of the world you live in. Because no matter how much you
win in your dreams,
your gains are illusory, and
you always come away empty-handed.
But
in life,
whether you win or lose, you’ve
always got something to show for it—even if it’s only a scar
or a painful memory.

GEORGINA. Scars
are ugly and pain hurts.

CLARK. Without ugliness, there would be no beauty. And if you’re afraid to know pain, you’ll never know the value of pleasure.

GEORGINA. You’re a tough guy aren’t you?

CLARK. Well, I’ve had to fight my own way through life, ever since I can remember.
You either get tough, or else you go under.

GEORGINA. It’s not the way I was
brought up. I always had people to protectme.

CLARK. If you bandage a
muscle
long enough, it withers.
And that goes for your emotions, too. If you keep smothering
them with dreams,
they’ll die after
a while.

Of
course, as any actor knows, you need to know your cues, a cue being the last
bit of the previous actor’s line or the event leading to yours. Once again, I
find it helps to think not just in terms of the actual word or words but also
the ideas expressed. In the above exchange between the extroverted newspaperman
Clark Redfield and the daydreaming bookshop owner Georgina Allerton, it is easy
to see how the real cues lie in the ideasexpressed (dreaming versus life, wins and gains, ugliness and
beauty, pain and pleasure, toughness and fighting versus protection, bandaging,
withering and smothering).

In summary, make the ‘law’ of association
work for you. Think of your speech, poem or play lines as a drift of ideas, one
after the other, and learn to give those images visible and audible expression.
Act, react, and project. Get into the ‘look’, ‘feel’ and ‘sound’ of the idea,
focusing especially on your key lines. Pay attention to the idea above all
else, for it is ideas which, first
and foremost, you are to communicate to your listeners or audience. Once the
idea has been committed to memory, then pay attention to the words. It will
then be that much easier. Look for and commit to memory the association between
one idea and the next, as well as the association between an idea itself and
the words giving expression to that idea. Also, look for and commit to memory any connections within a single idea. Finally, practise mindfulness, which as Dr Jon Kabat-Zinn has said, means –‘Paying attention in a particular
way; on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally.’ Give bare (that is, clear, focused and
unadulterated) attention. Maintain choiceless
awareness. In other words, be both physically and psychologically present at
all times -- and generate and maintain interest and enthusiasm in what you are
doing.

COPYRIGHT---TERMS OF USE---DISCLAIMER

COPYRIGHT: There is no intention to infringe copyright in respect of any copyrighted material; if any person believes there is or may be an infringement of their copyrighted material on any page of this website please advise me by email and any offending material will be removed immediately.

TERMS OF USE AND DISCLAIMER: By and in using this blog, which includes but is not limited to all posts as well as all material linked to those posts as well as to any other parts of the blog ("this Site"), the user agrees to the following Terms of Use and Disclaimer:

The purpose of this Site is to give information by way of general comment only, which is not designed to be comprehensive, but which may be of interest to some or all of the public ("the Information"). Ian Ellis-Jones ("IEJ") may amend and also update the material on this Site from time to time but does not guarantee that any of the material is current. The Information does not constitute, and is not intended to be, professional advice, whether of a healthcare kind or otherwise, nor is it intended to be relied upon as a basis for action on the part of any individual in respect of any matter in relation to which there could be loss or damage. Any professional advice of whatever kind sought must be tailored to the user’s specific circumstances. There has been no consideration given as to whether any or all of the Information is appropriate for you. You should not act upon any of the Information without first taking specific advice on your own particular circumstances. IEJ is not, and does not hold himself out as, a medical practitioner. Neither IEJ nor any person or company with whom or with which he is associated makes or gives any representation or warranty of any kind regarding the Information, which is not intended to be a replacement or substitute for professional healthcare or advice of a doctor of medicine or other health care professional. If needed, such advice should be obtained through the services of a competent healthcare or other professional. IEJ as well as all persons and companies with whom and with which he is associated disclaim and do not accept any liability for the decisions you make based on any Information contained on or or linked to this Site or for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from action taken, or not taken, in reliance of or upon any or all of the Information but expressly exclude completely and unequivocally any and all such liability. No guarantee is made or given that the material on this Site is free from computer viruses or other defects. No responsibility is accepted for any viruses that may infect the user's computer or any damages to the user's property on account of the user's use of this Site. Certain links in this Site may connect to other websites maintained by third parties over whom IEJ or any other person or company with whom or with which he is associated has no control. Accordingly, no representations or warranties are made or given as to the accuracy or any other aspect of information contained in other websites. Finally, this blog is the personal work of IEJ and has no affiliation with his law firm, his company Ellis-Jones Enterprises Pty Limited, his colleagues or any other person, company or body with whom or with which he is associated including but not limited to the New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry and any and all clients.

European Union (EU) laws require that EU visitors to this site be given information about cookies used on the blog. For more information on Google's use of certain Blogger and Google cookies on the blog, including Google Analytics and AdSense cookies, please read Google’s privacy practices and how Google uses data on partner sites.

CREATIVE COMMONS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. Click on CC logo for details.