Breaking: North Korea Promises 'All-Out, High-Intensity' Action

the party leadership promised to "stage a high-intensity, all-out action, and maximize its preparation ... so that just after an order is issued, we
can destroy and sweep America and the South Korean puppet army, and achieve the historic achievement of reunified Korea."

Thee most intense words/promises coming out of little Un's mouth. I guess these last few weeks have proven myself wrong, when hoping this kid would
be different than his heirs. Hoping see Switzerland for a few yeaers while in School, opened his eyes... Young mind, young heart. Evil.

One mistake and, IMO, SK and US will end this regime and I will be SO grateful
(as long as their is no nuclear fallout)

This is a joke, they are saber rattling with no saber. North Korea is a joke of a country. The only threatened country is to their South. China
would squash North Korea if their britches got too big because it would cause instability to China. China does not want all out war on a border
country that involves the U.S. again.

This is a joke, they are saber rattling with no saber. North Korea is a joke of a country. The only threatened country is to their South. China
would squash North Korea if their britches got too big because it would cause instability to China. China does not want all out war on a border
country that involves the U.S. again.

This is just that, a joke of a threat as it has been for 50+ years.

Some joke, considering it registered a 4.8 on the richter scale. Not sure how explosives register on the scale, but something tells me that whatever
created that 4.8 wasn't a firecracker.

Since the North does not have the Supercomputing capability to design their Nukes to be 100% able to detonate without testing...they have to test
them. Still...these are PRIMATIVE old style circa 1945 Fission Bombs which are too large and too heavy to be placed atop of their current ICBM.

A Nuke as large as this type as far as size would need a MASSIVE rocket to be used as a delivery system. I don't see them having a small warhead or
accurate missile for many years.

Originally posted by SpaDe_
Some joke, considering it registered a 4.8 on the richter scale. Not sure how explosives register on the scale, but something tells me that whatever
created that 4.8 wasn't a firecracker.

The 2006 North Korean nuclear test was the detonation of a nuclear device conducted on October 9, 2006 by North Korea.

The blast is estimated to have had an explosive force of less than one kiloton,

According to Jane's Defence Weekly, "initial and unconfirmed South Korean reports indicate that the test was a fission device with a yield of 0.55 kT
... The figure of 0.55 kT, however, seems too low given the 4.2 register on the Richter scale. This could suggest – depending upon the geological
make-up of the test site – a yield of 2–12 kT."[24]

Originally posted by SpaDe_
Some joke, considering it registered a 4.8 on the richter scale. Not sure how explosives register on the scale, but something tells me that whatever
created that 4.8 wasn't a firecracker.

The 2006 North Korean nuclear test was the detonation of a nuclear device conducted on October 9, 2006 by North Korea.

The blast is estimated to have had an explosive force of less than one kiloton,

According to Jane's Defence Weekly, "initial and unconfirmed South Korean reports indicate that the test was a fission device with a yield of 0.55
kT ... The figure of 0.55 kT, however, seems too low given the 4.2 register on the Richter scale. This could suggest – depending upon the geological
make-up of the test site – a yield of 2–12 kT."[24]

So if 5.1 4.9 then we should have an estimate of what was set off.

edit on 11-2-2013 by winofiend because: (no reason
given)

Very interesting, if the 4.2 from 2006 was figured in at 2-12kt then this should be in the upper end of that range and maybe a little higher?

Does anyone know of a resource online that shows seismographic data in an up to date format? Or for various regions? I can't seem to get google to
understand me.

I don't even know if there is such a thing, I'm sure there would be.

To see the 'quake data and see how it looked. I mean, they obviously can determine where it is and the depth and size so .. am I just reading the usgs
site wrong? I know the location, I want to see the actual seismic data.

As mentioned above it would be obvious to tell if it was natural or not. It'd be interesting to keep an eye on.

But I'm having a complete fiendish time trying to find it..

... gah

found seismic data but low and behold, the north korean data for today is not available. hrumph.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.