Actions for selected content:

Send content to

To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .

To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep articles for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services
Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.

Summary

Rainer Werner Fassbinder's film Despair was shot in 1977 and was proudly premiered at the Cannes International Film Festival in 1978. The film is based on one of Vladimir Nabokov's major Russian novels, Despair. The eminent British playwright Tom Stoppard prepared the screenplay for Fassbinder, carefully adapting Nabokov's text for cinematic staging. The hypotext Despair was originally published in 1934 in Contemporary Letters, a major Russian–Parisian literary journal of the pre-war emigration, and further issued as a separate book in Berlin (by Petropolis) in 1936. The original storyline was set in Berlin at the beginning of the 1930s.

Fassbinder's Despair has enjoyed wide scholarly attention over the years. Of particular importance are the works of the British scholar Ewa Mazierska and the film historian Thomas Elsaesser. Most recently, the Russian critic Nina Savchenkova organized a special roundtable focused on the film's reception in Russia which was hosted by the Nabokov museum in St. Petersburg. The ontological discongruity between the two artists was one of the dominant themes of this roundtable. In what follows, I will analyze Fassbinder's hypertext along with Nabokov's hypotext in order to address the dramatic dialectical collision that occurs when Fassbinder transports Nabokov's hypotext to a different cultural territory—namely Nazi Germany. The main differences between these artistic sensibilities are related to two major spheres: “the territory of homosensuality,” as opposed to the heterosexual universe of Nabokov, and the “territory of nascent Nazism” as explored by Fassbinder, which is opposed to Nabokov's “neutral” German environs. The point is not to illustrate the affinity between the two artists, but rather to highlight the personal and aesthetical differences that emerge with this border crossing.

WRITTEN AND CINEMATIC TEXTS

Before we start the discussion, it is important to account for all of the available versions of the author's text (the Russian hypotext and then Nabokov's own modified English translation and the English script-adaptation of the film by Stoppard—both hypertexts of the original).

Recommend this

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.