You are here

15 more O.J. jurors chosen

2977221

O.J. TRIAL: DAY 3 • Fifteen potential jurors passed questioning by attorneys, bringing the total to 27. The total must reach 40 before the final phase of jury selection, which could happen today. • Four more potential jurors were excused, bringing the total to 24.

Jury selection in O.J. Simpson's armed robbery trial could wrap up today if the process speeds along like it did Wednesday.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys passed 15 more potential jurors through voir dire questioning, putting the three-day total at 27. Once that number reaches 40, jury selection will move into its final phase and narrow the group to 12 jurors and six alternates.

"The end is near, folks," District Judge Jackie Glass said as everyone headed home after another marathon session.

Lawyers said they would be willing to work late tonight to complete jury selection and take Friday off before starting the trial on Monday.

Glass had said her goal was to finish jury selection in a week despite some predictions that it would take several weeks. She has kept jury selection moving by prodding lawyers to avoid redundant or irrelevant questioning.

Simpson and co-defendant Clarence "C.J." Stewart are both charged with armed robbery, kidnapping and other counts in connection with a sports memorabilia heist last year at the Palace Station.

Many of the questions this week have focused on potential jurors' opinions about Simpson's 1995 acquittal on charges of killing his ex-wife and her friend in Los Angeles County and whether the jurors could separate that case from his current case.

"Nobody should be judged on the past," Simpson lawyer Yale Galanter said. "Nobody should be judged on the future. They should be judged on what happens in Judge Glass' courtroom."

Many potential jurors said they believed Simpson committed the murders and should have been found guilty.

"To me, if someone got away with something like that -- in my opinion he was guilty -- you would keep yourself clean and not come down here and commit another crime," said one juror, a carpet cleaner who spent three decades in construction.

That comment sparked a bench conference between the judge, lawyers and juror.

Comment section guidelines

The below comment section contains thoughts and opinions from users that in no way represent the views of the Las Vegas Review-Journal or GateHouse Media. This public platform is intended to provide a forum for users of reviewjournal.com to share ideas, express thoughtful opinions and carry the conversation beyond the article. Users must follow the guidelines under our Commenting Policy and are encouraged to use the moderation tools to help maintain civility and keep discussions on topic.