Sunday, 3 July 2016

The Saker on Turkey

This
has been an amazing week which saw the first clear sign of the
collapse of the EU and Turkish President Erdogan presenting his
excuses to Russia for the downing of a Russian SU-24 over Syria 7
month ago. While the latter event was largely eclipsed by the former,
it might be the sign of something even more dramatic taking place:
the collapse of Turkey.

Does
that seem like hyperbole?

Let’s
look again.

The
Presidency of Erdogan has been nothing short of cataclysmic for
Turkey which resulted in a perfect storm of crises, each of the very
serious:

1)
Crisis in Syria: the Turkish policy of support for Daesh to overthrow
Assad has failed. Abjectly so. Not only is Assad still in power, but
the latest bombing in Turkey seem to indicated that Daesh is turning
against Turkey now (assuming the official explanations is true, which
it might not be as we will discuss below). The entire Syria policy of
Erdogan is now in shambles.

2)
Crisis with the EU: the last thing the Brits did before Brexiting was
to tell Turkey that it could join the EU in 3000 years. Other EU
member states were not as direct, but everybody knows that this is
true. Furthermore, the grand Erdogan-Merkel friendship and alliance
has completely fizzled out.

3)
Crisis with the Armenians: when the German Parliament recognized the
genocide of the Armenians and, soon thereafter, so did the Pope, it
was pretty darn clear that the western powers that be were sending
Turkey a simple message: a raised middle finger. Love story over,
screw you!

4)
Crisis with the USA: US special forces have now been spotted in Iraq
wearing Kurdish badges. While minor, this incident is telling and has
greatly angered the Turks. Bottom line: the Empire needs the Kurds in
Iraq and Syria and Turkey takes second place right now.

5)
Crisis with Iran: by supporting Daesh, by trying to sabotage the
“Islamic pipeline” and by trying to overthrow Assad, Turkey has
completely alienated Tehran.

6)
Crisis with the Kurds: by engaging in an even more brutal level of
anti-Kurdish violence the Turks have basically re-ignited a full
scale civil war and the Kurds are showing no signs of getting weaker.
In fact, they are currently more powerful than ever, courtesy of the
US invastion of Iraq.

7)
Crisis with NATO: following the downing of the Russian SU-24 NATO
clearly indicated to Erdogan that he was on his own and that NATO
would not get involved in an Turkey-triggered war.

8)
Crisis with Russia: the downing of the SU-24 did not result in the
expected Russian military response, but resulted in 7 months of
crippling economic sanctions by Russia and an enormous loss of
prestige by Turkey. More about this later.

So,
this can be all summed up by saying that Turkey under Erdogan has
shown a truly Ukrainian-level of incompetence, arrogance and
delusion.

It
is in this, truly dramatic, context that Erdogan had to write his
letter of apology.

The
first thing which should be said about this is that Erdogan took a
major political risk: after spending months chest-thumping and
declaring uri et orbi that Turkey will never, ever, apologize if only
because Turkey was in the right, this sudden “zag!” puts Erdogan
is a very difficult position. Hence the initial rumors that the
letter said that he was “sorry” but not “apologizing” or,
second variant, that the apology was only to the family of the
murdered Russian pilot, but not to Russia. This did not last too long
and pretty soon the bewildered Turks gave up trying to give this
apology a face-lift. It was exactly what everybody understood it to
be: a real full and humiliating apology.

Next
there was a statement of the Turkish foreign minister categorically
denying that any compensation would be paid. That too lasted a couple
of hours until it was admitted that not only would Turkey pay, but
Turkey would pay whatever was demanded.

Finally,
there is a very real possibility that the bombing of the airport in
Ankara Istambul might be a very direct message sent to Erdogan: “if
you try to appease the Russians we will unleash hell on you”. And
while Daesh is a prime candidate for sending that kind of message,
there are other possible candidates: the US, of course, and the
Turkish deep-state. To make matters even more complicated, we should
not discard any scenario as impossible, including the possibility
that Erdogan himself, and his supporters, engaged in a false-flag
event to justify 1) cooperation with Russia against terrorism and 2)
turning against Daesh.

Right
now, the official version (Daesh did it) makes sense to me, but I
would not discount any other possibility.

What
is certain is that the stakes in Turkey are now sky-high and that
Erdogan is fighting for his future and, possibly, the future of
Turkey as a state. His opening towards Russia and, at the same time,
Israel is a clear sign of despair. If only because Russia is unlikely
to offer much in terms of rewards for the following reasons:

First,
the Russians are now deeply suspicious of Erdogan and consider him a
loose cannon, possibly a lunatic, who cannot be trusted and who can
make a zag after every zig.

Second,
the letter was a first, necessary, step to reopen negotiations, but
the negotiations themselves will be a long process. Foreign Ministers
Lavrov and Cavusoglu will begin these negotiations this week, but the
number of issues to be discussed in very long. Most importantly, the
Russians will demand tangible and important steps from Turkey,
especially in Syria and in regards to Turkey sponsored terrorism in
Russia and the Ukraine. It is by no means clear to me that Erdogan
will be willing to make such major concessions. Officially, I expect
a lot of smiles and hopeful declarations, but behind closed door the
Russians will be making many tough demands. It is not clear to me
that Ergodan could yield to the Russian demands even if he wanted to.

Erdogan
really appears to have deluded himself that he is some kind of major
player and he is now discovering that he is not. What is even worse,
he now probably realizes that he has many dangerous enemies and no
friends at all.

Potentially,
Russia could offer Turkey a lot, way more than just a return to
better relations, tourists and a market for Turkish vegetables. But
my feeling is that Erdogan is turning to Russia in despair and to
improve his bargaining position towards all the others enemies he has
made. The problem is that he Russians probably see that too and that
they will be very cautious, even if they hide this caution behind all
manners of nice diplomatic language.

I
might be wrong here, but I think that the Russians want Erdogan out.
In their minds they have already “Saakashvilized” him if only
because Turkey is an extremely important country, strategically
located and Russia cannot afford to have a delusional lunatic ruling
it. Furthermore, the Turkish people have a major problem on their
hands: a severe case of multiple personality disorder. They have to
decide if they want to be secular Europeans, “Young Turk”
neo-Fascist nationalists, Islamic radicals, Kemalist secularists? Do
they want a impossible mono-ethnic Turkey or can they accept that
others not only live there too, but also that these “others”
lived in these lands long before the Turkic nomads invaded them?
Right now, Turkey is anti-European, anti-Russian, anti-American,
anti-Kurdish, anti-Armenian, anti-Christian, anti-Arabic,
anti-Persian, anti-Greek, etc. That makes Turkey a big powder keg
which any spark could detonate. And the problem for Russia is that
this powder keg is uncomfortably close and deeply involved in the
Ukraine, Crimea, the Caucasus and Central Asia.

What
this all means is that it is in Russia’s strategic interest to have
a responsible and trustworthy partner to deal with. Sadly, I don’t
see that as very likely because, just as in the case of the Ukraine
and Israel, the problem with Turkey is that this an artificial,
illegitimate and fundamentally unsustainable country.

Israel,
the Ukraine and Turkey are all built on a rabidly nationalist/racist
worldview which offers no hope to anybody that does not agree with
this worldview. This is why, for the Turks, the Kurds are either
“mountain Turks” or “terrorists” who deserve to be shot. It
would be naïve to the extreme to think that the mindset which made
the genocide of Armenians, along with many other minorities
(Christian Assyrians, Syrians, Chaldeans and Greeks), has somehow
disappeared especially if we keep in mind that a) the Turks still
deny the reality of this genocide and b) that this genocide has never
stopped, but only slowed down:

Genocide,
besides the actual physical destruction of the members of the target
group, aims also to erase all traces of the target group’s
identity, through forced assimilation. In the Armenian case, it was
mainly women and children who were forced to convert to Islam,
adopting Turkish or Kurdish names and thus lost their Armenian
identity over time. Another measure of the genocidal process is
deleting all traces of the population who have been massacred or
driven away by such deportations. This includes destruction of all
buildings and monuments while renaming all the names of villages,
towns, rivers, and other things that can attest to the presence of
Armenians in the area. In 1914, the Armenian Patriarch of
Constantinople presented a list of Armenian sacred places that were
under his supervision. The list contained 2,549 religious sites of
which 200 were monasteries while 1,600 were churches. A survey in
1974 showed that only 916 Armenian churches could be identified
within Turkey’s borders, half of which were almost completely
destroyed and among the rest only ruins of 252 items remained. The
authorities have also renamed almost all villages, towns, mountains,
and rivers in Armenia and changed their historical Armenian name to
Turkish ones. This policy continues even in our days when, for
example, the Turkish Interior Ministry announced in 2005 that it
would rename certain animal Latin names since they had “separatist
tendencies”. Armeniana Ovis (sheep) would be renamed Ovis
orientalis Anatolicus, while Capreolus Capreolus Armenus (deer) would
be called Capreolus Capreolus capreolus. Even Vulpes Vulpes
Kurdistanica (red fox) was to be renamed Vulpes Vulpes. The proposal
was rejected by UNESCO, the UN agency in charge of these data,
referring to the unfounded the Turkish reasons for the changes
(source)

And
then there is Cyprus, which the Turks still illegally occupy. Again,
such levels of violence in and around artificial and illegitimate
countries is something normal and not a temporary fluke (see: the
Ukraine and Israel).

What
this all means for Russia is that while the Kremlin will warmly
welcome Erdogan’s latest “zag” and while efforts will be made
to return to a more or less situation, the only possible long term
goal for Russia is to support either the break-up or the
federalization of Turkey into some kind of more or less civilized
country. The good news for Russia is that she really need not make
any special efforts towards that goal as the Turks, just like the
Israelis and the Ukrainians, are doing a splendid job making sure
that their political project never becomes viable. The best thing
Russia can do at this point in time is to brace for the likely
flare-up of violence in Turkey and try to protect herself, and her
allies, from the inevitable fallout.

As
for Turkey – the future looks very grim. The latest move to court
Russia and Israel will not meaningfully improve the strategic
situation for Turkey. At best, it will give the *appearance* of a
pseudo-regional détente. But nothing else will change unless the
Turkish state itself changes and that is something that the Turkish
people do not seem to be willing to accept, at least not in the
foreseeable future.