Norwegian farm structure

It can often be a challenge to find the right place when we try to pinpoint the location of the farm where our ancestors lived. Hopefully this is a little easier if we know something about Norwegian farm structure.

Featured photo of Grasreiten at Skeidsvoll by photogr. Josefsen. Used by permission from Romsdalsmuseet.

In this article I want to look at the structure of the old Norwegian farms. As we look for our ancestors we must go for names and birth dates, but it can be useful to have a overview of the area were they lived.

Garden/Gården – the farm

When we in Norway talks about “en gard” – “a farm” we normally think of one production unit with one household. This is a bit misleading as the old use of the word “Gard” is to describe the original un-divided farm (Holmsen 1979:13). This is also how the word is used in the cadastres (matriklene) Throughout history very many of the original farms (matrikkelgård) were divided into different farm-parts. These farm-parts are in Norwegian called “Bruk”.

I will use the words “original farm” to describe the area that may consist of several production units (bruk). Sometimes these original farms may appear like a little village.

Olav Rekdal gives a good description of this when he tells about the farm Skeidsvoll in the municipality of Vestnes. I choose to use this farm as an example as it does not have all that many divisions. He tells that up until 1654 Skeidsvoll was one undivided farm. Later it was divided into two equal sized farm-parts (bruk) Innigar(d)en and Utigar(d)en. In 1861 Utigarden was divided (one farmpart remained as Utigarden) and the part that was “splitt off” was called Grasreiten. In 1891 Innigarden was split in two, and the farmpart Vollen was created (Rekdal 1973:457). In addition to this, Grasreiten had a cotters place named Rongja.

In sources we may find people described as living at e.g. Vollen under Skeidsvoll. This means they lived at the farmpart Vollen within the area of the original farm Skeidsvoll.

Skeidsvoll Gard (situation 1891)

Farm parts – Bruk

Cotter’s places – Husmannsplasser

Innigarden part no. 1

Utigarden part no. 2

Grasreiten part no. 3

Rongja

Vollen part no. 4

[pullquote]I wrote “identity information” to underline that we are not talking about a surname or a family name. The last part of the “id info” that, to us, looks like a surname, is in fact the address [/pullquote]According to Rekdal’s book all the people living at the tre first farmparts are recorded as living at Skeidsvoll. This means that their “identity information” is ending with Skeidsvoll. E.g. Erik Erikson Skeidsvoll. The people on these three farm-parts were related, but were three different production units and households. This was common on the different farms. Because of this relationship, you can often find people living at the same farm, but on different farm-parts, with the same name. You might want to have a look at my articles about Norwegian naming and Norwegian renaming traditions where I try to point out the problems this might cause for us genealogists. The people living at the cotter’s place Rongja are also recorded as living at Skeidsvoll (They were not related to the other people at the Skeidsvoll farm). As the last farm-part Vollen (no 4) was established as late as 1891, it seems like the people there used, as a surname, the name of the farm where they originated (Rekdal 1973:467).

Skeidsvoll was/is a fairly small farm. Let us look at the larger Sør-Sylte farm in the same area (Tresfjord, Møre og Romsdal), still helped by Olav Rekdal’s farm and family history book.

Sør-Sylte Gard (situation ca. 1900)

Farm parts – Bruk

Cotter’s places – Husmannsplasser

1. Lensmannsgarden/Ivergarden

Monsplassen

Ivaplassen

Jørn-bakkjin

2. Olagarden

3. Markengarden

4. Martinesgarden

Tøftå

Røsthauplassen

5. Syltebøen

Syvertplassen

Rasmusplassen

6. Andersgarden/Umunngarden

7. Villagarden

Ellingplassen

8. Knutgarden/Heljegarden

Ørjaplassen

9. Øvrebøen/Gjere

Olaplassen

10. Nybøen

11. Nilsgarden

12. Syltebakkå

The cotter’s places I have listed here may not all have been occupied at the same time. I have already left out four un-named cotter’s places mentioned in early sources, as I suspect they may be some of the same places that are mentioned later with the above listed names.

If we go to the 1801 census and look at Sør-Sylte/Sørsylte, we find 66 persons listed under this farm. Five men are listed as “Huusbonde” which means that they were head of a household. In addition, we find three men listed as “huusmand” which means they were cotters. On the Sør-Sylte farm we find eight different household/production units living on different farm parts/cotter’s places. We have 66 persons who all may appear in the sources as “first name” – “patronymic” – “Sør-Sylte” (Ref : my article Norwegian naming). Some of these people were related. Others were not, like my forefather Hans Larson. He is one of the cotters listed in this census. He and his wife Guro Olsdatter both came from other parts of Norway.

If we go to the 1900 census we find at Sør-Sylte 129 persons living in ca. 26 households. I write “circa” as some of these persons are single, undoubtedly lodgers and one may debate if it correct to call them “a household”. We can see that some have started to use surnames as there are people recorded with last names that does not originate on the Sør-Sylte farm. Some of the people may have started to use their patronymic as a surname. Still, there is a large number of people at this farm who may be recorded, in the sources, with Sør-Sylte/Sørsylte/Sylte used as a surname. Once again; these people may or may not be related. Surnames as a legal concept were not itroduced in Norway until 1923.[pullquote]Cadastre/Cadaster is a comprehensive register of the real estate that commonly includes details of the ownership, the tenure, the cultivations if rural, and the value of individual parcels of land. (Wikipedia)[/pullquote]

The farm numbering system

I feel it would be wrong to talk about Norwegian farm structure without mentioning the farm numbering system. This system was put in place to clearly identify the different farms and farmparts. As the numbering system has changed through the years, it can sometimes be more confusing than clarifying. I will try to break it down and point out some things to keep in mind.

The cadastre was updated on a regular basis to reflect the changing value of the farms. We will look at some changes that were made to this system,

In the early 1700’s they started to identify the original farms by a number (Matrikkelnummer). The number series covered fairly large areas (Holmsen 1979:182). This scan from the 1724 cadastral draft show Sør-Sylte farm as number 459. In this system the different farmparts were only identified by the name of the head of the household.

The scan below from the cadastral revision from 1836 (put in effect in 1838) show that the original farms are given new numbers (matrikkelnummer). The first column show the new number (Sør-Sylte 24) and in the second column we recognise the number 459 from the 1724 cadastral draft. The original farms where numbered starting with “1” in each “thinglag” (court district). In this new cadastre the different farmparts are numbered (løpenummer). As I have included the farms before and after Sør-Sylte, we see that the farmsparts have a different number series also starting at “1” in the court district. When there were new farm divisions these farmparts got a letter attached to the original number e.g. 73b (Geire 1996:24).If these “number-letter b” farms were divided each part got added a number e.g. 73b1 and 73b2 (Stoa 1993:19)

It soon became clear that this numbering system was very confusing and did not serve it’s purpose. The work on a new cadastral was started in 1863 and put in place in 1886. Here the old “Matrikkelnummer”- cadastrenumbers, were renamed “Gårdsnummer” – farmnumber and the number on the farmparts (løpenummer) was called “Bruksnummer”. In addition the farmparts were starting with number 1 under each original farm. (Geire 1996:24)

This is the terms and the numbering system that is still in use today. Each piece of property should be numbered according to this principle. In relation to Norwegian real estate you sometimes find the abbreviation “Gnr./Bnr. 61/137”. This means plot (farm part) number 137 under the original farm number 61.

In addition to the changes we have already looked at, there are some other things to keep in mind when looking at the farmstructure and farmnumbering.

Sometimes the farm numbering may not truly show the extent of the original farm. We find a number of farms that have a prefix to their name. These prefixes are normally adjectives that tells something about how the farms/farmparts are geographically placed in relation to each other. E.g. Ytre (Outer) Eidhammer and Indre (Inner) Eidhammer. My family should actually be named “Indre Eidhammer”. There are many other adjectives in use e.g Søndre/Nordre – Southern/Northern. Øvste/Nedste – Upper/Lower and also Store/Lille – Big/Small These distinctions may be relevant for us as the people may be refered to by only the main part of the farmname. My family has since the 1880’s used Eidhammer as a family name and so has people from the farm “Ytre Eidhammer”.

Some farmparts may “disappeare” from maps and later records as these are sold/inherited and included in neigbouring farmparts.

In parts of the country the farms were not numbered in the earliest cadastres. Through the different revisions of the cadastre, some of the original farms may have been redefined as farmparts of a different farm. (Holmsen 1979:202-203).

If two municipalities unite, the farmnumbers of one of the municipalities has to be changed to fit with the numbering in the other municipality. If the geographical boundaries are adjusted, farms may end up in a new a municipality and thus get a new number.

This article grew in size while I worked on it. I hope I have been able to explain the Norwegian farm structure in a comprehensable way. I also hope that this article show how knowledge about this can be usefull to us genealogists. If nothing else, I learned a lot from writing it 🙂

Please don’t hesitate to comment or contact me if you find something that needs clarifiaction, or you see that something is missing or wrong.