It's a very sparse selection of myths, attached to even sparser "debunkings." Sadly, the CIA's debunkings can be easily debunked simply by taking a few quick peeks into the past, along with even briefer peeks into its present actions.

With more than 90 percent of all CIA employees now living and working entirely within the United States, most CIA employees are far from the sources of intelligence needed to protect Americans...

The intelligence bureaucracy likes this [needing a few billion more in the budget to "hire better people"] because it lets them create ever more layers of managers, who swan about Washington area conference rooms "communicating." What is needed is more intelligence operators on the ground, and the intelligence they gather must be sent to where it's needed quickly.

The intelligence on Northwest Flight 253 was delivered to an American Embassy in Nigeria by the suspect's father. But this information could not be processed through the masses of chiefs and deputy chiefs in the time needed, roughly five weeks. The enormous and redundant staffing of U.S.-based offices with administrators and managers, arranged in complex hierarchies, stifles the flow of intelligence coming in from the field.

Myth: The CIA spies on US citizens.

The CIA post reminds us that domestic spying duties belong to the FBI, even though it admits to working closely with the Bureau, along with other law enforcement agencies, to aid them with their domestic spying operations. But! It "does not collect information concerning the domestic activities of US citizens." Except when it does, as it quite possibly is doing currently in its partnership with the NYPD, or as it has in the past on multiple occasions.

Project MERRIMAC was a domestic espionage operation coordinated under the Office of Security of the CIA. It involved information gathering procedures via infiltration and surveillance on Washington-based anti-war groups that might pose potential threats to the CIA. However, the type of data gathered also included general information on the infrastructure of targeted communities. Project MERRIMAC and its twin program, Project RESISTANCE were both coordinated by the CIA Office of Security. In addition, the twin projects were branch operations that relayed civilian information to their parent program, Operation CHAOS. The Assassination Archives and Research Center believes that Project MERRIMAC began in February 1967.

Project RESISTANCE was a domestic espionage operation coordinated under the Domestic Operations Division (DOD) of the CIA. Its purpose was to collect background information on groups around the U.S. that might pose threats to CIA facilities and personnel. From 1967 to 1973, many local police departments, college campus staff members, and other independent informants collaborated with the CIA to keep track of student radical groups that opposed the U.S. government's foreign policies on Vietnam. Project RESISTANCE and its twin program, Project MERRIMAC were both coordinated by the CIA Office of Security. In addition, the twin projects were branch operations that relayed civilian information to their parent program, Operation CHAOS.

The major facts regarding CIA domestic mail opening may be summarized as follows:

a. The CIA conducted four mail opening programs in four cities within the United States for varying lengths of time between 1953 and 1973: New York (1953-1973) ; San Francisco (four separate occasions, each of one to three weeks duration, between 1969 and 1971) ; New Orleans (three weeks in 1957) ; and Hawaii (late 1954 -- late 1955). The mail of twelve individuals in the United States, some of whom were American citizens unconnected with the Agency, was also opened by the CIA in regard to particular cases.

b. The stated purpose of all of the mail opening programs was to obtain useful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence information. At least one of the programs produced no such information, however, and the continuing value of the major program in New York was discounted by many Agency officials.

c. Despite the stated purpose of the programs, numerous domestic dissidents, including peace and civil rights activists, were specifically targeted for mail opening.

d. The random selection of mail for opening, by CIA employees untrained in foreign intelligence objectives and without substantial guidance from their superiors, also resulted in the interception of communications to or from high-ranking United States government officials, as well as journalists, authors, educators, and businessmen.

e. All of the mail opening programs were initiated without the prior approval of any government official outside of the Agency.

Myth: The CIA is above the law.

If you possess the cognitive dissonance needed to disregard the CIA's illegal domestic spying and solely concentrate on this "myth," you run headlong into this -- the first rule about being "above the law" is: never declare you are above the law. It just makes people upset. The CIA's post points to the National Security Act of 1947 and the fact that it reports to two Congressional oversight committees as evidence that it couldn't, even if it wanted to, operate in an "above the law" fashion.

The administration recently approached members of the U.S. Congress to seek a waiver that would allow the CIA to use cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment on detainees in U.S. custody outside the United States.

Moreover, administration officials have previously told Congress that they do not consider CIA personnel operating outside the United States to be bound by legal prohibitions against “cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment” under treaties to which the United States is party.

Although the CIA will not acknowledge details of its system, intelligence officials defend the agency's approach, arguing that the successful defense of the country requires that the agency be empowered to hold and interrogate suspected terrorists for as long as necessary and without restrictions imposed by the U.S. legal system or even by the military tribunals established for prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay.

[T]he New York Times reported that Richard Nuccio, a senior State Department officer, has been threatened with criminal charges and faces the ruin of his government career because last year he made it known to a member of the House Intelligence Committee that the CIA had repeatedly lied to it, in defiance of the law, about its responsibility in the murders of an American citizen and the husband of another American in Guatemala.

The CIA argues that it is a crime (the Justice Department opened a criminal investigation of Mr. Nuccio) for an official of the government to privately inform an appropriate member of Congress -- properly cleared to receive classified information -- that the CIA had lied to Congress about illegal actions that included complicity in murder.

The State Department, after investigation, imposed a year's security probation on Mr. Nuccio. That decision was overruled by the CIA -- an unprecedented action -- and John Deutch, CIA director, now has appointed a special outside panel to advise him as to whether Mr. Nuccio should be forced out of government, and effectively out of a career in international relations.

Red Cross investigators concluded last year in a secret report that the Central Intelligence Agency’s interrogation methods for high-level Qaeda prisoners constituted torture and could make the Bush administration officials who approved them guilty of war crimes, according to a new book on counterterrorism efforts since 2001.

The book says that the International Committee of the Red Cross declared in the report, given to the C.I.A. last year, that the methods used on Abu Zubaydah, the first major Qaeda figure the United States captured, were “categorically” tortured, which is illegal under both American and international law.

Project MKUltra is the code name for a covert research operation experimenting in the behavioral engineering of humans (mind control) through the CIA's Scientific Intelligence Division. The program began in the early 1950s, was officially sanctioned in 1953, was reduced in scope in 1964, further curtailed in 1967 and "officially halted" in 1973. The program engaged in many illegal activities; in particular it used unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens as its test subjects, which led to controversy regarding its legitimacy. MKUltra involved the use of many methodologies to manipulate people's individual mental states and alter brain functions, including the surreptitious administration of drugs (especially LSD) and other chemicals, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, as well as various forms of torture.

The scope of Project MKUltra was broad, with research undertaken at 80 institutions, including 44 colleges and universities, as well as hospitals, prisons and pharmaceutical companies. The CIA operated through these institutions using front organizations, although sometimes top officials at these institutions were aware of the CIA's involvement. MKUltra was allocated 6 percent of total CIA funds.

Myth: The CIA arrests people who break the law.

Quite right. The CIA only "detains" and "holds" suspects, sometimes indefinitely, in super-secret "holding facilities" scattered around the globe and away from the prying eyes of various governments, including our own. Sure, the CIA won't be coming after the drug dealer that lives in your neighborhood, but if your name is something like Hussef al-Foreigner and you live somewhere we're currently at "war" with (currently: the rest of the globe, including the United States) and have a third cousin who once accidentally subscribed to Jihadist Quarterly while trying to close a popup, you can probably expect a visit from the CIA, who will take you "downtown" for a few questions that might take as long as 6-8 years to answer correctly.

The CIA operates secret prisons abroad for holding key suspects in the war on terror, President Bush acknowledged Wednesday.

Bush's acknowledgement came as the president announced that he was sending legislation to Congress that would authorize military tribunals for terror suspects and set clear rules to protect U.S. military personnel from facing prosecution for war crimes.

The official also said there were no detainees still in the secret CIA prisons but that the CIA still has the authority to detain suspects.

The report provides the most comprehensive account to date of life in a secret CIA prison, as well as information regarding 38 possible detainees. The report explains that these prisoners’ treatment by the CIA constitutes enforced disappearance, a practice that is absolutely prohibited under international law.

Congressionally approved exemptions generally authorize activities that benefit a specific U.S. goal, such as countering the terrorist threat to U.S. citizens overseas or combating drug trafficking.

In addition to the exemptions previously discussed, there are other authorities that waive the prohibition on assistance to police forces of foreign countries. For example, the President may authorize foreign assistance when 'it is important to the security interests of the United States'. This allows the President to waive any provision of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, including section 660.

See also: selected portions from above debunkings.

"...administration officials have previously told Congress that they do not consider CIA personnel operating outside the United States to be bound by legal prohibitions against “cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment” under treaties to which the United States is party..."

"The CIA operates secret prisons abroad for holding key suspects in the war on terror, President Bush acknowledged Wednesday... The official also said there were no detainees still in the secret CIA prisons but that the CIA still has the authority to detain suspects."

"...these prisoners’ treatment by the CIA constitutes enforced disappearance, a practice that is absolutely prohibited under international law..."

"For example, the President may authorize foreign assistance when 'it is important to the security interests of the United States'. This allows the President to waive any provision of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, including section 660..."

So, citizens and non-citizens, you have nothing to fear from the kinder, gentler Central Intelligence Agency! It's nothing like the torture-happy thuggery portrayed in the latest blockbuster. It's actually much, much worse.

Re:

who is watching the watchers ? ? ?

why, the watchers are watching themselves, so its all good, richtig ? ? ?

THANK YOU for continuing to shine a small spotlight on these issues...

something to keep in mind, is that these fuckers LIE to US all the fucking time...
they obfuscate, they technically parse, they dissemble, they just plain LIE about EVERYTHING...
their very existence is based on a lie...

hoover and the feebs played/play the same kind of tricks: slippery definitions of 'agents', etc; such that you can't nail down ANYTHING by their answers...

not to mention, they outsource/privatize so much of their evil crap that they are constantly claiming they don't do shit about shit, EXCEPT it is the contractors and quasi-private kreeps operating in the shadows (like blackwater/xe) who are doing the nasty stuff, now...

these secret institutions are ANTITHETICAL to a healthy democracy... ALL secret institutions WILL be corrupted and hijacked by the 1%...
ALL.
OF.
THEM.

i don't care if it is the sea eye ehh, or the PTA... if you make it secret, corruption WILL follow...

I don't know why people keep whining about law enforcement / spying / military in this country? If you voted (IF), you voted for it. You elected the freaks that do this in the name of security. Now you have a country that is no way near free. So the next time you decide to whine Tim and all the commentees, remember to vote and vote for something that means something. 40% of registered voters are registered independent but yet we have no independence. Gives you something to think about huh!

Garbage

I'd call this "article" garbage but that would be an insult to garbage. Worst piece of trash I've read in a while. Terribly cited and poorly written. Tim, you obviously haven't a clue what you are writing. Maybe you should stick with what you know since you clearly don't know anything about this particular topic.

Re: Garbage

Re:

When it come to representation, the political parties have it more or less sewn up, making it very difficult for independents to get a look in. They have convinced most people that they should vote for the policies (party) they prefer, rather tha for a person who best represents their viewpoint. They can also use the scare tactics that voting for independents is voting for anarchy.
These are the big hurdles that have to be overcome in most democracies. These include convincing people that a lively discussion of policies after an election and within the government is a good thing, and that failure to reach a consensus probaly means that no law is required, and that people can choose their own solution rather than being given one.

Re:

More a case of they were engaged in the favourite pastime of bureaucracies, internal and external power fights. In recognition of this failure to coordinate with various agencies, you ended up with a new agency, the TSA, just to increase the number of bureaucracies and engage even more bureau(c)rats in the infighting and inter agency fighting.
This will make it even easier for the next set of attackers to slip through the net, as it will be even harder to get actual information to the few people that can do anything.

Re:

Slight problem with your pov.

In a representative form of government, the candidate can promise anything and when in office produce nothing. This is standard practice, possibly you haven't noticed. Even worse, once in office the representative can claim a mandate where one clearly did not exist. This also is standard practice. This system is running open loop, there is no feedback, no control mechanism and it stands a good chance of self destruction.

It would be nice if our representatives acted on behalf of their constituents, you know ... actually perform their job duties. Apparently they think they have free rein. The people should have a means of charging them with contempt of constituents, immediately, and not have to wait till they come up for election again - because this does not work, obviously.

Not to be a Negative Nancy here, but as written, your comments about domestic spying are too easily dismissed as legitimate security concerns. Mail opening programs too easily dismissed as targetting foreign intelligence that happens to pass through domestic hands, or ensuring that radical student groups are just that, radical student, and not a group funded by the Soviet Union to undermine the integrity of the United States. Then you start waltzing into grey area of "Hey, just making sure we aren't needed here". The most substantial complaint that can't be easily explained away would be the lack of training and direction for the mail readers.

"The CIA argues that it is a crime (the Justice Department opened a criminal investigation of Mr. Nuccio) for an official of the government to privately inform an appropriate member of Congress -- properly cleared to receive classified information -- that the CIA had lied to Congress about illegal actions that included complicity in murder."

Now THAT is just scary.

The part about foreign policy just seems misplaced as well. As a foreign intelligence service, it SHOULD have a hand in foreign policy. "Hey boss, before you sign that, we'd like to let you know that their president eats kittens for breakfast and spends the afternoon kicking puppies. Also, we believe they're trying to acquire nuclear weapons." Lets be honest, all foreign intelligence isn't necessarily about threats, it's about what the other guys are doing as well. Unbiased (The hard part really) input from your intelligence agencies should ALWAYS play a critical role in foreign policy. Now if only we can escalate making biased reports a capital crime :(

The rest of your points aren't easily explained away. Note, I said easily explained, not legitimately explained. Foreign policy is the only one that's really easily and legitimitely explained away, especially since you pretty much brought it up to ignore the topic.

Re:

I don't know why people keep whining about law enforcement / spying / military in this country? If you voted (IF), you voted for it.

Explain how people voted to support this when they have no proportional representation in the House and have to follow the rules of a Senate process that elects two sides of a corporate elite.

So the next time you decide to whine Tim and all the commentees, remember to vote and vote for something that means something. 40% of registered voters are registered independent but yet we have no independence. Gives you something to think about huh!

The CIA...

IS made up of torture happy thugs, no question. And it's nothing new either. They totally ignore the U.S. Constitution, all laws, and consider themselves completely immune from any prosecution for anything. Anyone who crosses them or points out that they have broken the law is considered a terrorist who should be shot. They believe the end totally justifies the means and they believe they can do whatever they want if they think it will solve some problem.

Re:

Then the answer, obviously, is not to vote. There is NO difference between the two major parties on this subject. Until things get bad enough that the normal people start supporting alternatives to the monopoly on power we have in the US political system, nothing is going to change.

Even *if* we could get a viable 3rd party candidate elected to national office the media and the bureaucracy of security state would grind him up spit him out; ensuring, through coercion or derision, that he is unable to check the power of the government.

Look at the few, very vocal, [semi-]independent, intelligent voices in congress. Their proposals are tossed out to make way for a corrupt, crazy broad waving a blank piece of paper she can't tell you about, but trust her, it's really bad.

Re:

I'm still trying to find the words to describe an organization that is akin to a secret police force making a post stating that it's not above the law. On a medium which is littered with thousands of examples of how they are clearly breaking the law day in, day out. As if someone isn't going to know.

It's akin to a person who is on fire asking if anyone is smoking and going on a rant about how it's bad for one's health.

Senator McCain and other Senators are calling for the launch of an official investigation. Into the recent movie portraying CIA operations falsely. Claiming the CIA fabricated lies in an attempt to mislead the Producers and directors of the recent Hollywood movie.

Re:

to vote and vote for something that means something

Hmm I seem to remember reading somewhere that a certain Mr Obama campaigned on, among other things, transparency for government. So it would seem that perhaps people did "vote for something that means something" to them, it just turned out that their votes didn't really mean anything at all...

Re:

You have to be kidding... Corporations have the money to pay people off, or pay for campaigns. Not counting the already-corrupt people in office. Transparency and some sort of cap/limit on how much money a company can keep in the bank, even if this is done through taxes.

Still won't fix it, but it will make it harder to hide. Why is the CIA allowed to have corporations anyway? The government shouldn't be allowed in the corporate sector.

Is this even news?

Actually, only 1st one is real myth ("Everyone at the CIA is a spy."). Most likely, most of the people who we call "spy" are not even US citizens. So while they are working for CIA they are not it's employees.
Rest of article is naive at best. Author probably don't understand how this "intelligence info" is collected and what exactly is this "spying" he's talking about.

Talking about "above the law" is little more nuianced - CIA is not above the law, but this law allows pretty match anything. Think about police officer (which is also not-above-the-law), but one can detain/interrogate/etc you.

As for being torture-happy thugs - that's not how such agencies work. The word "intelligence" have 2 meanings - "information" and "being smart". So, basically you have 2 types of people - one who smart and other is torture happy. That's _supposed_ to be that way.

The real problem is not CIA: it's foreighn policy where US make wars instead of diplomatic connections. CIA is just a tool, like gun or tank.