It's central will is negation of slavery which have been discussed above. Also arbitrary detention is impermissible with this. However through law freedom can be limited. One notable example would be the turmoil in time of Uthman (ra). The author states “No institutions were devised to channel political activity, and, in the absence of such institutions, the pre-Islamic tribal jealousies and rivalries, which had been suppressed under earlier caliphs, erupted once again. In view of the lenient policies adopted by Uthman, the people took advantage of such liberties, which became a headache for the state, and it culminated in the assassination of Uthman.”1 Hence any threat to destabilize the establishment through incitement will incur wavering of freedom. However it could be said prophet pbuh said “The best Jihad is a speech of truth in the presence of a tyrant ruler.”2 Now this is different from incitement. Through sincere intent truth can be spoken in a wise manner to the unjust ruler. If we look at the Nasîhatnâme3 we can find ample examples of what is saying truth to the rulers in the way of advice and wisdom. It has been stated in the analysis of preamble that we are to obey the ruler in all that is good and be patient in all that befall us. The exception to this rule will commence under certain conditions. To say it in short freedom is allowed in general sense of the law unless specified by the specific injunctions, public interest of moral preservation, and to safeguard the five interests of Islam. The wording “By all available means” to safeguard freedom is dangerous as it also allows armed rebellion, chaos and turmoil which is not allowed in Islam as discussed in the preamble.