Special protection zones stretching for between 3 to 10 kilometers around the farms have been set up until the epidemic ceases, a decree published in the Official Journal said.

There is currently no evidence that the virus is transmitted to humans through birds’ eggs, meat or foie gras, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Centre for Disease and Control (ECDC) stated.

Court Finds Monsanto Responsible for Poisoning French Farmer

The court of appeals in Lyon, France, has found agribusiness giant Monsanto guilty of poisoning a man named Paul François. François is a farmer who claimed that he suffered a multitude of ailments, including headaches, memory loss, neurological problems and stammering, after he unintentionally inhaled Monsanto’s herbicide, Lasso.

François used Lasso for over 15 years, and in 2004 accidentally inhaled the product. After the incident, the farmer began getting severe headaches and experienced moments of mental absence and an inability to speak.

The chemical’s effects on François were so severe that he fainted, was hospitalized and fell into a coma. François was diagnosed with monochlorobenzene poisoning by his doctors, who found that the chemical permanently damaged his brain. Monochlorobenzene makes up 50% of the herbicide Lasso.

It is worth noting that the herbicide was prohibited in France and the rest of the European Union in 2007, and at the time of the incident, it was already banned in Canada (since 1985), Great Britain and Belgium (since 1992).

During the court hearing, Monsanto’s attorneys repeatedly claimed that the herbicide Lasso was not dangerous. François claimed that the company was aware of the toxic nature of the herbicide but failed to adequately warn about the potential health risks.

The Independent: Another 18 girls claim adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine

Eighteen Irish teenage girls have recently come forward claiming to be suffering acute physical side-effects from the controversial HPV anti-cervical cancer vaccine administered in their schools. Parents came forward after the Sunday Independent revealed similar claims of suffering from 131 young women a weekend ago.

These new allegations have surfaced since a doctor in Denmark (where Gardasil is no longer used) linked some chronic symptoms to the vaccination. In Denmark, one in 500 girls display a range of side-effects, there are 143 Irish teenagers are now suffering debilitating health issues, and we know girls in the US are suffering as well. Because of this, expert petitions are underway in France and Spain to ban its use, and Japan has stopped recommending the vaccine all together.

How safe is the HPV vaccine? Thousands of adverse reactions to cervical cancer jab recorded annually

THOUSANDS of adverse reactions to the lifesaving cervical cancer jab are being recorded by health chiefs every year, The Sunday Post can reveal.

Campaigners last night said the vaccine should no longer be given to schoolgirls until more is found out about the side-effects of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine.

The Post’s figures show more than 6,000 suspected adverse reactions to the jab have been recorded across the UK since 2012, including 340 in Scotland.

However, campaigners claim this is just the tip of the iceberg as health chiefs estimate they only receive reports about 10% of all suspected adverse reactions, suggesting tens of thousands could have suffered similarly.

More than eight million HPV jabs have been given to girls aged 12 and 13 in the UK since 2008 and the vaccination programme is credited with saving 400 lives every year.

But pressure is growing for the authorities to get a better understanding of the side-effects as the figures obtained by The Post show one person south of the Border died this year as a result of a suspected adverse reaction to the HPV jab.

MSPs on Holyrood’s petitions committee agreed to ask SNP ministers for their view on campaigners’ calls to hold a roundtable discussion on the safety of the vaccine, involving medical and scientific experts from both sides of the debate.

Gardasil, a vaccine for the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), has been labeled as a controversial since it has been made available. Although beneficial in preventing cancer within the girls that receive the vaccine, the side effects that some are experiencing can be debilitating for many girls. Those side effects have many wondering if the drug is safe enough for human use.

Common side effects of being vaccinated with Gardasil include nausea, headaches, and even fainting at the time of the vaccination, or shortly after, according to the Independent. However, more extreme side effects are more serious and longer lasting, often times permanent. They include chronic fatigue, chronic regional pain syndrome, postural tachycardia syndrome, and fibromyalgia, according to Jesper Mehlsen of the Frederiksberg Hospital in Denmark.

Mehlsen was quick to point out that the conditions have not been proven to be caused by Gardasil, but there is a growing trend among girls that have received the vaccine and are experiencing the exact same conditions over time.

“We have noted a pattern of symptoms in a relatively large group of patients and that these symptoms seem to have a temporal association to the vaccination.”

[Photo by Russell Kirk/Merck & Co. via Getty Images]

Recently, 18 teenage girls came forward to report debilitating side effects after taking Gardasil, joining the growing number of teens across the world that have experienced harmful side effects after taking Gardasil. In Ireland, about 131 girls have been identified, and in Denmark, over 1,100 hundred girls suffer from Gardasil side effects, according to the Independent. The number of reported drastic side effects in America vary depending on the study that is read. However, reports of negative and debilitating side effects from around the world have led nearly 40 percent of American parents to not vaccinate their children from HPV.

If you follow the mainstream media, you’ll probably only know the Seralini 2012 rat feeding study as “that GMO cancer study that got retracted.” You probably won’t know that the paper has since been republished and Seralini himself has won two court victories defending his work. Join me for today’s Thought For The Day as I break down the GMO truth that Monsanto doesn’t want you to know.

……….

Seralini’s team wins defamation and forgery court cases on GMO and pesticide research

On 25 November 2015, the High Court of Paris indicted Marc Fellous, former chairman of France’s Biomolecular Engineering Commission, for “forgery” and “the use of forgery”, in a libel trial that he lost to Prof Gilles-Eric Séralini. The Biomolecular Engineering Commission has authorised many GM crops for consumption.

The details of the case have not yet been publicly released but a source close to the case told GMWatch that Fellous had used or copied the signature of a scientist without his agreement to argue that Séralini and his co-researchers were wrong in their reassessment of Monsanto studies.

The Séralini team’s re-assessment reported finding signs of toxicity in the raw data from Monsanto’s own rat feeding studies with GM maize.

The sentence against Fellous has not yet been passed and is expected in June 2016.

Defamation case

The latest ruling marks a second court victory for Séralini’s team.

In September 2012, an article written by Jean-Claude Jaillette in Marianne magazine said that “researchers around the world” had voiced “harsh words” about the research of Séralini and his team on the toxic effects of a GMO and Roundup over a long term period – research that was supported by the independent organisation CRIIGEN. The journalist wrote of a “scientific fraud in which the methodology served to reinforce pre-determined results”.

Séralini, his team, and CRIIGEN challenged this allegation in a defamation lawsuit. They were assisted by the notaries Bernard Dartevelle and Cindy Gay.

On 6 November 2015, after a criminal investigation lasting three years, the 17th Criminal Chamber of the High Court of Paris passed sentence. Marianne magazine and its journalist were fined for public defamation of a public official and public defamation of the researchers and of CRIIGEN, which is chaired by Dr Joel Spiroux de Vendômois.

Double standards used in evaluating GMO safety studies

An example of an inconclusive study that has not been retracted from FCT is the Monsanto study on the same GM maize variety that Séralini tested.

Scientific studies should be evaluated according to standards that are consistently and transparently applied to all studies, regardless of whether their findings are reassuring, surprising, or unpopular. Yet it appears that the Séralini study has been singled out for retraction under a criterion of “inconclusiveness” that has not been applied to other papers.

An example of an inconclusive study that has not been retracted from FCT is the Monsanto study on the same GM maize variety that Séralini tested (Hammond et al, 2004).[1] This study used the same strain of rat and analyzed blood and urine samples from the same number of animals as Séralini used in total.

Crucially, however, the Monsanto study was only 90 days in duration. Thus it was terminated a month before the more obvious pathologies began to appear in the Séralini study. Nevertheless, the data in the Monsanto study show statistically significant differences in multiple organ functions between the GM and non-GM feeding groups, which the Monsanto authors dismissed as not “biologically meaningful”, without proper scientific justification.

As a result, and of great importance from a public health perspective, this GM maize was passed by regulators as safe to consume on a life-long basis despite the fact that the Monsanto study was only 90 days in duration and contained scientifically questionable claims of statistically significant findings being termed as not “biologically meaningful”.

Independent journalists, including E. Ann Clark, James Corbett, Rachel Aviv, and Democracy Now!, document how Big Agriculture giants Monsanto and Syngenta have attempted to silence the findings and destroy the reputations of scientists whose research shows that the companies’ herbicides pose serious threats to human health.

In September 2012, Dr. Gilles-Éric Séralini published research findings in the peer-reviewed Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology. These findings showed the toxic impact of Monsanto’s herbicide and genetically modified corn—including adverse health effects on rats. However, after publication, the journalmade the unprecedented decision to retract the study.

Journaleditor Dr. A. Wallace Hayes admitted that none of the established criteria for retracting a study applied to the Séralini paper. However, as Clark and Corbett reported, a new connection between the journal and Monsanto might account for the retraction, as well as another retraction of a similar study from Brazil that demonstrated the toxic effects on mice of an insecticide that forms the basis of the Bt GMO crops. After these papers were published, the Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology created a new position: the associate editor for biotechnology. The journal then selected Richard E. Goodman, from the University of Nebraska, to fill the position and preside over such retractions. As it turns out, Goodman worked in regulatory sciences for Monsanto from 1997 to 2004.

Genetic Fallacy: How Monsanto Silences Scientific Dissent

That a former Monsanto scientist should find himself in charge of a specially-created post at the very journal that published two landmark studies questioning the safety of that company’s products should surprise no one who is aware of the Monsanto revolving door. This door is responsible for literally dozens of Monsanto officials, lobbyists and consultants finding themselves in positions of authority in the government bodies that are supposedly there to regulate the company and its actions.

Find out more about Monsanto’s ability to suppress scientific dissent in this week’s edition of the BoilingFrogsPost.com Eyeopener report.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

The health effects of a Roundup-tolerant NK603 genetically modified (GM) maize (from 11% in the diet), cultivated with or without Roundup application and Roundup alone (from 0.1 ppb of the full pesticide containing glyphosate and adjuvants) in drinking water, were evaluated for 2 years in rats. This study constitutes a follow-up investigation of a 90-day feeding study conducted by Monsanto in order to obtain commercial release of this GMO, employing the same rat strain and analyzing biochemical parameters on the same number of animals per group as our investigation. Our research represents the first chronic study on these substances, in which all observations including tumors are reported chronologically. Thus, it was not designed as a carcinogenicity study. We report the major findings with 34 organs observed and 56 parameters analyzed at 11 time points for most organs.

Results

Biochemical analyses confirmed very significant chronic kidney deficiencies, for all treatments and both sexes; 76% of the altered parameters were kidney-related. In treated males, liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5 to 5.5 times higher. Marked and severe nephropathies were also generally 1.3 to 2.3 times greater. In females, all treatment groups showed a two- to threefold increase in mortality, and deaths were earlier. This difference was also evident in three male groups fed with GM maize. All results were hormone- and sex-dependent, and the pathological profiles were comparable. Females developed large mammary tumors more frequently and before controls; the pituitary was the second most disabled organ; the sex hormonal balance was modified by consumption of GM maize and Roundup treatments. Males presented up to four times more large palpable tumors starting 600 days earlier than in the control group, in which only one tumor was noted. These results may be explained by not only the non-linear endocrine-disrupting effects of Roundup but also by the overexpression of the EPSPS transgene or other mutational effects in the GM maize and their metabolic consequences.

Conclusion

Our findings imply that long-term (2 year) feeding trials need to be conducted to thoroughly evaluate the safety of GM foods and pesticides in their full commercial formulations.

Keywords:

Research

Empirical natural and social sciences produce knowledge (in German: Wissenschaften schaffen Wissen) which should describe and explain past and present phenomena and estimate their future development. To this end quantitative methods are used. Progress in science needs controversial debates aiming at the best methods as basis for objective, reliable and valid results approximating what could be the truth. Such methodological competition is the energy needed for scientific progress. In this sense, ESEU aims to enable rational discussions dealing with the article from G.-E. Séralini et al. (Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50:4221–4231) by re-publishing it. By doing so, any kind of appraisal of the paper’s content should not be connoted. The only aim is to enable scientific transparency and, based on this, a discussion which does not hide but aims to focus methodological controversies. -Winfried Schröder, Editor of the Thematic Series “Implications for GMO-cultivation and monitoring” in Environmental Sciences Europe.

Background

There is an ongoing international debate as to the necessary length of mammalian toxicity studies, including metabolic analyses, in relation to the consumption of genetically modified (GM) plants [1]. Currently, no regulatory authority requires mandatory chronic animal feeding studies to be performed for edible genetically modified organisms (GMOs), or even short-term studies with blood analyses for the full commercial formulations of pesticides as sold and used, but only for the declared active principle alone. However, several 90-day rat feeding trials have been conducted by the agricultural biotechnology industry. These investigations mostly concern GM soy and maize that are engineered either to be herbicide-tolerant (to Roundup (R) in 80% of cases), or to produce a modified Bt toxin insecticide, or both. As a result, these GM crops contain new pesticide residues for which new maximum residue levels (MRL) have been established in some countries.

Though the petitioners conclude in general that no major physiological changes is attributable to the consumption of the GMO in subchronic toxicity studies [2–5], significant disturbances have been found and may be interpreted differently [6,7]. A detailed analysis of the data in the subchronic toxicity studies [2–5] has revealed statistically significant alterations in kidney and liver function that may constitute signs of the early onset of chronic toxicity. This may be explained at least in part by pesticide residues in the GM feed [6,7]. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that R concentrations in the range of 103 times below the MRL can induce endocrine disturbances in human cells [8] and toxic effects thereafter [9]. This may explain toxic effects seen in experiments in rats in vivo[10] as well as in farm animals [11]. After several months of consumption of an R-tolerant soy, the liver and pancreas of mice were affected, as highlighted by disturbances in sub-nuclear structure [12–14]. Furthermore, this toxic effect was reproduced by the application of R herbicide directly to hepatocytes in culture [15].

More recently, long-term and multi-generational animal feeding trials have been performed, with some possibly providing evidence of safety, while others conclude on the necessity of further investigation because of metabolic modifications [16]. However, in contrast with the study we report here, none of these previous investigations have included a detailed follow-up of the animals, including multiple (up to 11) blood and urine sampling over 2 years, and none has investigated either the GM NK603 R-tolerant maize or Roundup.

Furthermore, evaluation of long-term toxicity of herbicides is generally performed on mammalian physiology employing only their active principle, rather than the complete formulations as used in agriculture. This was the case for glyphosate (G) [17], the declared active chemical constituent of R. It is important to note that G is only able to efficiently penetrate target plant organisms with the help of adjuvants present in the various commercially used R formulations [18]. Even if G has shown to interact directly with the active site of aromatase at high levels [19], at low contaminating levels, adjuvants may be better candidates than G to explain the toxicity or endocrine disruptive side effects of R on human cells [8,20] and also in vivo for acute toxicity [21]. In this regard, it is noteworthy that the far greater toxicity of full agricultural formulations compared to declared supposed active principles alone has recently been demonstrated also for six other major pesticides tested in vitro[22]. When G residues are found in tap water, food, or feed, they arise from the total herbicide formulation although little data is available as to the levels of the R adjuvants in either the environment or food chain. Indeed, adjuvants are rarely monitored in the environment, but some widely used adjuvants (surfactants) such as nonylphenol ethoxylates, another ethoxylated surfactant like POEA present in R, are widely found in rivers in England and are linked with disruption of wildlife sexual reproduction [23]. Adjuvants are found in groundwater [24]. The half-life of POEA (21 to 42 days) is even longer than for G (7 to 14 days) in aquatic environments [25]. As a result, the necessity of studying the potential toxic effects of total chemical mixtures rather than single components has been strongly emphasized [26–28]. On this basis, the regular measurement of only G or other supposed active ingredients of pesticides in the environment constitute at best markers of full formulation residues. Thus, in the study of health effects, exposure to the diluted whole formulation may be more representative of environmental pollution than exposure to G alone.

With a view to address this lack of information, we performed a 2-year detailed rat feeding study. Our study was designed as a chronic toxicity study and as a direct follow-up to a previous investigation on the same NK603 GM maize conducted by the developer company, Monsanto [3]. A detailed critical analysis of the raw data of this subchronic 90-day rat feeding study revealed statistically significant differences in multiple organ function parameters, especially pertaining to the liver and kidneys, between the GM and non-GM maize-fed group [3,7]. However, Monsanto’s authors dismissed the findings as not ‘biologically meaningful’ [3], as was also the case with another GM corn [29]. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) accepted Monsanto’s interpretation on NK603 maize [30], like in all other cases.

Our study is the first and to date the only attempt to follow up Monsanto’s investigation and to determine whether the differences found in the NK603 GM maize-fed rats, especially with respect to liver and kidney function, were not biologically meaningful, as claimed, or whether they developed into serious diseases over an extended period of time.

The Monsanto authors adapted Guideline 408 of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for their experimental design [3]. Our study design was based on that of the Monsanto investigation in order to make the two experiments comparable, but we extended the period of observation from Monsanto’s 90 days to 2 years. We also used three doses of GMOs (instead of Monsanto’s two) and Roundup to determine treatment dose response, including any possible non-linear as well as linear effects. This allowed us to follow in detail the potential health effects and their possible origins due to the direct or indirect consequences of the genetic modification itself in the NK603 GM maize, or due to the R herbicide formulation used on the GM maize (and not G alone), or both. Because of recent reviews on GM foods indicating no specific risk of cancer [2,16], but indicating signs of hepatorenal dysfunction within 3 months [1,7], we had no reason to adopt a carcinogenesis protocol using 50 rats per group. However, we prolonged to 2 years the biochemical and hematological measurements and measurements of disease status, as allowed, for example, in OECD protocols 453 (combined chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity) and 452 (chronic toxicity). Both OECD 452 and 453 specify 20 rats per sex per group but require only 50% (ten per sex per group, the same number that we used in total) to be analyzed for biochemical and hematological parameters. Thus, these protocols yield data from the same number of rats as our experiment. This remains the highest number of rats regularly measured in a standard GM diet study, as well as for a full formulated pesticide at very low environmentally relevant levels.

We used the Sprague-Dawley strain of rat, as recommended for chronic toxicology tests by the National Toxicology Program in the USA [31], and as used by Monsanto in its 90-day study [3]. This choice is also consistent with the recommendation of the OECD that for a chronic toxicity test, rats of the same strain should be used as in studies on the same substance but of shorter duration [32]. We then also tested for the first time three doses (rather than the two usually employed in 90-day protocols) of the R-tolerant NK603 GM maize alone, the GM maize treated with R, and R alone at very low environmentally relevant doses, starting below the range of levels permitted by regulatory authorities in drinking water and in GM feed.

Overall, our study is the first in-depth life-long toxicology study on the full commercial Roundup formulation and NK603 GM maize, with observations on 34 organs and measurement of 56 parameters analyzed at 11 time points for most organs, and utilizing 3 doses. We report here the major toxicological findings on multiple organ systems. As there was no evidence in the literature on GM food safety evaluation to indicate anything to the contrary, this initial investigation was designed as a full chronic toxicity and not a carcinogenicity study. Thus, we monitored in details chronologically all behavioral and anatomical abnormalities including tumors. A full carcinogenicity study, which usually focuses only on observing incidence and type of cancers (not always all tumors), would be a rational follow-up investigation to a chronic toxicity study in which there is a serious suspicion of carcinogenicity. Such indications had not been previously reported for GM foods.

Our findings show that the differences in multiple organ functional parameters seen from the consumption of NK603 GM maize for 90 days [3,7] escalated over 2 years into severe organ damage in all types of test diets. This included the lowest dose of R administered (0.1 ppb, 50 ng/L G equivalent) of R formulation administered, which is well below permitted MRLs in both the USA (0.7 mg/L) [33] and European Union (100 ng/L) [34]. Surprisingly, there was also a clear trend in increased tumor incidence, especially mammary tumors in female animals, in a number of the treatment groups. Our data highlight the inadequacy of 90-day feeding studies and the need to conduct long-term (2 years) investigations to evaluate the life-long impact of GM food consumption and exposure to complete pesticide formulations.

Results

Biochemical analyses of the maize feed

Standard biochemical compositional analysis revealed no particular differences between the different maize types and diets, the GM and non-GM maize being classified as substantially equivalent, except for transgene DNA quantification. For example, there was no difference in total isoflavones. In addition, we also assayed for other specific compounds, which are not always requested for establishing substantial equivalence. This analysis revealed a consistent and statistically significant (p < 0.01) decrease in certain phenolic acids in treatment diets, namely ferulic and caffeic acids. Ferulic acid was decreased in both GM maize and GM maize + R diets by 16% to 30% in comparison to the control diet (889 ± 107, 735 ± 89, respectively, vs. control 1,057 ± 127 mg/kg) and caffeic acid in the same groups by 21% to 53% (17.5 ± 2.1, 10.3 ± 1.3 vs. control 22.1 ± 2.6 mg/kg).

Anatomopathological observations and liver parameters

All rats were carefully monitored during the experiment for behavior, appearance, palpable tumors, and infections. At least ten organs per animal were weighed and up to 34 analyzed postmortem, at the macroscopic and/or microscopic levels (Table 1). Due to the large quantity of data collected, it cannot all be shown in one report, but we present here the most important findings. There was no rejection by the animals of the diet with or without GM maize, nor any major difference in body weight (data not shown).

Table 1.Protocol used and comparison to existing assessment and to non-mandatory regulatory tests

The most affected organs in males were the liver, hepatodigestive tract, and kidneys (Table 2; Figure 1A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I). Liver abnormalities such as hepatic congestions and macroscopic and microscopic necrotic foci were 2.5 to 5.5 times more frequent in all treatments than in control groups, where only two rats out of ten were affected with one abnormality each. For instance, there were 5 abnormalities in total in the GMO 11% group (2.5 times higher than controls) and 11 in the GMO 22% group (5.5 times greater). In addition, by the end of the experiment, Gamma GT hepatic activity was increased, particularly in the GMO + R groups (up to 5.4 times higher), this probably being reflective of liver dysfunction. Furthermore, cytochrome P450 activity generally increased in the presence of R (either in drinking water or in the GM maize-containing diet) according to the dose and up to 5.7 times greater at the highest dose.

Figure 1.Anatomopathological observations in rats fed GMO treated or not by Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. Macroscopic (A to D) and microscopic (A’ and C’) photographs show male left kidneys and livers (E to I) and female pituitaries (J to M), in accordance to Table 2. The number of each animal and its treatment is specified. Macroscopic pale spots (I) and microscopic necrotic foci in liver (G clear-cell focus, H basophilic focus with atypia), and marked or severe chronic progressive nephropathies, are illustrated. In females, pituitary adenomas (K to M) are shown and compared to control (J, rat number and C for control). Apostrophes after letters indicate organs from the same rat.

Transmission electron microscopic observations of liver samples confirmed changes for all treated groups in relation to glycogen dispersion or appearance in lakes, increase of residual bodies and enlargement of cristae in mitochondria (Figure 2, panels 2 to 4). The GM maize-fed groups either with or without R application showed a higher heterochromatin content and decreased nucleolar dense fibrillar components, implying a reduced level of mRNA and rRNA transcription. In the GMO + R group (at the highest dose), the smooth endoplasmic reticulum was drastically increased and nucleoli decreased in size, becoming more compact. In the R alone treatment groups, similar trends were observed, with a partial resumption of nucleolar activity at the highest dose.

Degenerating kidneys with turgid inflammatory areas demonstrated the increased incidence of marked and severe chronic progressive nephropathies, which were up to two fold higher in the 33% GM maize or lowest dose R treatment groups (Table 2; Figure 1, first line).

Biochemical analyses of blood and urine samples

Biochemical measurements of blood and urine were focused on samples taken at the 15th month time point, as this was the last sampling time when most animals were still alive (in treated groups 90% males, 94% females, and 100% controls). Statistical analysis of results employed OPLS-DA 2-class models built between each treated group per sex and controls. Only models with an explained variance R2(Y) ≥ 80%, and a cross-validated predictive ability Q2(Y) ≥ 60%, were used for selection of the discriminant variables (Figure 3), when their regression coefficients were significant at a 99% confidence level. Thus, in treated females, kidney failures appeared at the biochemical level (82% of the total disrupted parameters). Levels of Na and Cl or urea increased in urine with a concomitant decrease of the same ions in serum, as did the levels of P, K, and Ca. Creatinine and creatinine clearance decreased in urine for all treatment groups in comparison to female controls (Table 3). In GM maize-treated males (with or without R), 87% of discriminant variables were kidney-related, but the disrupted profiles were less obvious because of advanced chronic nephropathies and deaths. In summary, for all treatments and both sexes, 76% of the discriminant variables versus controls were kidney-related.

Furthermore, in females (Table 3), the androgen/estrogen balance in serum was modified by GM maize and R treatments (at least 95% confidence level, Figure 3). For male animals at the highest R treatment dose, levels of estrogens were more than doubled.

Tumor incidence

Tumors are reported in line with the requirements of OECD chronic toxicity protocols 452 and 453, which require all ‘lesions’ (which by definition include tumors) to be reported. These findings are summarized in Figure 4. The results are presented in the form of real-time cumulative curves (each step corresponds to an additional tumor in the group). Only the growing largest palpable growths (above a diameter of 17.5 mm in females and 20 mm in males) are presented (for example, see Figure 5A,B,C). These were found to be in 95% of cases non-regressive tumors (Figure 5D,E,F,G,H,I,J) and were not infectious nodules. These arose from time to time; then, most often disappeared and were not different from controls after bacterial analyses. The real tumors were recorded independently of their grade, but dependent on their morbidity, since non-cancerous tumors can be more lethal than those of cancerous nature, due to internal hemorrhaging or compression and obstruction of function of vital organs, or toxins or hormone secretions. These tumors progressively increased in size and number, but not proportionally to the treatment dose, over the course of the experiment (Figure 4). As in the case of rates of mortality (Figure 6), this suggests that a threshold in effect was reached at the lower doses. Tumor numbers were rarely equal but almost always more than in controls for all treated groups, often with a two- to threefold increase for both sexes. Tumors began to reach a large size on average 94 days before controls in treated females and up to 600 days earlier in two male groups fed with GM maize (11 and 22% with or without R).

Figure 4.Largest non-regressive tumors in rats fed GMO treated or not by Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. Rats were fed with NK603 GM maize (with or without application of Roundup) at three different doses (11%, 22%, and 33% in their diet; thin, medium, and bold lines, respectively) compared to the substantially equivalent closest isogenic non-GM maize (control, dotted line). Roundup was administered in drinking water at three increasing doses, same symbols, environmental (A), MRL in some agricultural GMOs (B), and half of minimal agricultural levels (C), see ‘Methods’). The largest tumors were palpable during the experiment and numbered from 20 mm in diameter for males and 17.5 mm for females. Above this size, 95% of growths were non-regressive tumors. Summary of all tumors are shown in the bar histograms: black, non-regressive large tumors; white, small internal tumors; grey, metastases.

Figure 5.Examples of female mammary tumors observed. Mammary tumors are evidenced (A, D, H, representative adenocarcinoma, from the same rat in a GMO group) and in Roundup and GMO + Roundup groups, two representative rats (B, C, E, F, I, J fibroadenomas) are compared to controls. A normal representative rat in controls is not shown, only a minority of them having tumors up to 700 days, in contrast with the majority affected in all treated groups. (G) The histological control.

Figure 6.Mortality of rats fed GMO treated or not with Roundup and effects of Roundup alone. The symbols of curves and treatments are explained in the caption of Figure 4. Lifespan during the experiment for the control group is represented by the vertical bar ± SEM (grey area). In bar histograms, the causes of mortality before the grey area are detailed in comparison to the controls (0). In black are the necessary euthanasia because of suffering in accordance with ethical rules (tumors over 25% body weight, more than 25% weight loss, hemorrhagic bleeding, etc.); and in hatched areas, spontaneous mortality.

In female animals, the largest tumors were in total five times more frequent than in males after 2 years, with 93% of these being mammary tumors. Adenomas, fibroadenomas, and carcinomas were deleterious to health due to their very large size (Figure 5A,B,C) rather than the grade of the tumor itself. Large tumor size caused impediments to either breathing or digestion and nutrition because of their thoracic or abdominal location and also resulted in hemorrhaging (Figure 5A,B,C). In addition, one metastatic ovarian cystadenocarcinoma and two skin tumors were identified. Metastases were observed in only two cases; one in a group fed with 11% GM maize and another in the highest dose of R treatment group.

Up to 14 months, no animals in the control groups showed any signs of palpable tumors, whilst 10% to 30% of treated females per group developed tumors, with the exception of one group (33% GMO + R). By the beginning of the 24th month, 50% to 80% of female animals had developed tumors in all treatment groups, with up to three tumors per animal, whereas only 30% of controls were affected. A summary of all mammary tumors at the end of the experiment, independent of size, is presented in Table 2. The same trend was observed in the groups receiving R in their drinking water (Figure 4, R treatment panels). The R treatment groups showed the greatest rates of tumor incidence, with 80% of animals affected (with up to three tumors for one female), in each group. Using a non-parametric multiple comparison analysis, mammary tumor incidence was significantly increased at the lowest dose of R compared to controls (p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn’s test). All females except one (with metastatic ovarian carcinoma) presented in addition mammary hypertrophies and in some cases hyperplasia with atypia (Table 2).

The second most affected organ in females was the pituitary gland, in general around two times more than in controls for most treatments (Table 2; Figure 1J,K,L,M). Again, at this level of examination, adenomas and/or hyperplasias and hypertrophies were noticed. For all R treatment groups, 70% to 80% of animals presented 1.4 to 2.4 times more abnormalities in this organ than controls.

The large palpable tumors in males (in kidney and mostly skin) were by the end of the experimental period on average twice as frequent as in controls, in which only one skin fibroma appeared during the 23rd month. At the end of the experiment, internal non-palpable tumors were added, and their sums were lower in males than in females. They were not significantly different from controls, although slightly increased in females (Figure 4, histogram insets).

Mortality

The rates of mortality in the various control and treatment groups are shown as raw data in Figure 6. Control male animals survived on average 624 ± 21 days, whilst females lived for 701 ± 20 days during the experiment, plus in each case, a 5-week starting age at reception of animals and a 3-week housing stabilization period. After mean survival time had elapsed, any deaths that occurred were considered to be largely due to aging. Before this period, 30% control males (three in total) and 20% females (only two) died spontaneously, while up to 50% males and 70% females died in some groups on diets containing the GM maize (Figure 6, panels GMO, GMO + R). However, the rate of mortality was not proportional to the treatment dose, reaching a threshold at the lowest (11%) or intermediate (22%) amounts of GM maize in the equilibrated diet, with or without the R application on the crop. It is noteworthy that the first two male rats that died in both GM maize-treated groups had to be euthanized due to Wilms’ kidney tumors that had grown by this time to over 25% of body weight. This was approximately a year before the first control animal died. The first female death occurred in the 22% GM maize feeding group and resulted from a mammary fibroadenoma 246 days before the first control female death. The maximum difference in males was five times more deaths occurring by the 17th month in the group consuming 11% GM maize and in females six times greater mortality by the 21st month on the 22% GM maize diet with and without R. In the female cohorts, there were two to three times more deaths in all treated groups compared with controls by the end of the experiment and deaths occurred earlier in general. Females were more sensitive to the presence of R in drinking water than males, as evidenced by a shorter lifespan (Figure 6, panels R). The general causes of death represented in histogram format within each of the panels in Figure 6, are linked mostly to mammary tumors in females and to problems in other organ systems in males.

Discussion

This report describes the first long-term (2-year) rodent (rat) feeding study investigating possible toxic effects arising from consumption of an R-tolerant GM maize (NK603) and a complete commercial formulation of R herbicide. The aims of this investigation were essentially twofold. First, to evaluate whether the signs of toxicity, especially with respect to liver and kidney functions, seen after 90 days’ consumption of a diet containing NK603 R-tolerant GM maize [3,7] escalated into serious ill health or dissipated over an extended period of time. Second, to determine if low doses of full commercial R formulation at permitted levels were still toxic, as indicated by our previous in vitro studies [8,9]. The previous toxicity study with NK603 maize employed only this GM crop that had been sprayed with R during cultivation [3]. However, in our study presented here, in addition to extending the treatment period from 90 days to 2 years and in order to better ascertain the source of any ill health observed, we included additional test feeding groups. These consisted of NK603 maize grown without as well as with R application and R alone administered via drinking water. Furthermore, we used three levels of dosing in all cases rather than the two previously used [3], in order to highlight any dose response effects of a given treatment. It is also important to note that our study is the first to conduct blood, urine, and organ analyses from animals treated with the complete agricultural formulation of R and not just G alone, as measured by the manufacturer [35].

Our data show that the signs of liver and kidney toxicity seen at 90 days from the consumption of NK603 GM maize [3,7] do indeed escalate into severe disease over an extended period. Furthermore, similar negative health effects were observed in all treatment groups (NK603 GM maize with or without R application and R alone).

What is also evident from our data is that ill effects were not proportional to the dose of either the NK603 GM maize ± R or R alone. This suggests that the observed disease may result from endocrine disruptive effects, which are known to be non-monotonic. Similar degrees of pathological symptoms occurred from the lowest to the highest doses, suggesting a threshold effect [36]. This corresponds to levels likely to arise from consumption or environmental exposure, such as either 11% GM maize in food, or 50 ng/L G equivalent of R-formulation, a level which can be found in some contaminated drinking tap waters and which falls within authorized limits.

Death in male rats was mostly due to the development of severe hepatorenal insufficiencies, confirming the first signs of toxicity observed in 90-day feeding trials with NK603 GM maize [7]. In females, kidney ion leakage was evident at a biochemical level at month 15, when severe nephropathies were observed in dead male animals at postmortem, at the anatomopathological level. Early signs of toxicity at month 3 in kidney and liver were also observed for 19 edible GM crops containing pesticide residues [1]. It is known that only elderly male rats are sensitive to chronic progressive nephropathies [37]. Therefore, the disturbed kidney functional parameters may have been induced by the reduced levels of phenolic acids in the GM maize feed used in our study, since caffeic and ferulic acids are beneficial to the kidney as they prevent oxidative stress [38,39]. This possibility is consistent with our previous observation that plant extracts containing ferulic and caffeic acids were able to promote detoxification of human embryonic kidney cells after culture in the presence of R [40]. It is thus possible that NK603 GM maize consumption, with its reduced levels of these compounds, may have provoked the early aging of the kidney physiology, similarly to R exposure causing oxidative stress [41]. Disturbances in global patterns of gene expression leading to disease via epigenetic effects cannot be excluded, since it has been demonstrated that numerous pesticides can cause changes in DNA methylation and histone modification, thereby altering chromatin compaction and thus gene expression profiles [42].

Disturbances that we found to occur in the male liver are characteristic of chronic toxicity, confirmed by alterations in biochemical liver and kidney function parameters. The observation that liver function in female animals was less negatively affected may be due to the known protection from oxidative stress conferred by estrogen [43]. Estrogen can induce expression of genes such as superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase via the MAP kinase-NF-kB signaling pathway, thus providing an antioxidant effect [43]. Furthermore, liver enzymes have been clearly demonstrated as sex-specific in their expression patterns, including in a 90-day rat feeding trial of NK603 GM maize [7]. However, in a long-term study, evidence of early liver aging was observed in female mice fed with R-tolerant GM soy [12]. In the present investigation, deeper analysis at an ultrastructural level revealed evidence of impediments in transcription and other defects in cell nuclear structure that were comparable in both sexes and dose-dependent in hepatocytes in all treatments. This is consistent with the well-documented toxic effect of very low dilutions of R on apoptosis, mitochondrial function, and cell membrane degradation, inducing necrosis of hepatocytes, and in other cell lines [8,9,44,45].

The disruptions of at least the estrogen-related pathways and/or enhancement of oxidative stress by all treatments need further confirmation. This can be addressed through the application of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic methods to analyze the molecular profile of kidneys and livers, as well as the GM NK603 maize [46–48]. Other possible causes of observed pathogenic effects may be due to disturbed gene expression resulting from the transgene insertional, general mutagenic, or metabolic effects [49,50] as has been shown for MON810 GM maize [51,52]. A consequent disruption of general metabolism in the GMO cannot be excluded, which could lead, for example, to the production of other potentially active compounds such as miRNAs [53] or leukotoxin diols [54].

The lifespan of the control group of animals corresponded to the mean for the strain of rat used (Harlan Sprague-Dawley), but as is frequently the case with most mammals, including humans [55], males on average died before females, except for some female treatment groups. All treatments in both sexes enhanced large tumor incidence by two- to threefold in comparison to our controls and also the number of mammary tumors in comparison to the Harlan Sprague-Dawley strain [56] and overall around threefold in comparison to the largest study with 1,329 Sprague-Dawley female rats [57]. This indicates that the use of historical data to compare our tumor numbers is not relevant, first, since we studied the difference with concurrent controls chronologically (and not only at the end of the experiment, as is the case in historical data), and second, since the diets of historical reference animals may have been contaminated with several non-monitored compounds including GMOs and pesticides at levels used in our treatments. In our study, the tumors also developed considerably faster than in controls, even though the majority of tumors were observed after 18 months. The first large detectable tumors occurred at 4 and 7 months into the study in males and females, respectively, further underlining the inadequacy of the standard 90-day feeding trials for evaluating GM crop and food toxicity [1]. Future studies employing larger cohorts of animals providing appropriate statistical power are required to confirm or refute the clear trend in increased tumor incidence and mortality rates seen with some of the treatments tested in this study. As already stated, our study was not designed as a carcinogenicity study that would have required according to OECD the use of 50 rats per sex per group. However, we wish to emphasize that the need for more rats to provide sufficient statistical power may be biased by the presence of contaminants in the diets used in gathering historical control data, increasing artificially the background of tumors, which would inappropriately be called in this case ‘spontaneous’ or due to the genetic strain. For instance, toxic, hormonal disrupting or carcinogenic levels of pesticides, PCBs, plasticizers, dioxins, or heavy metals may contaminate the diets or drinking water used for the establishment of ‘spontaneous’ tumors in historical data [58–62].

In females, induced euthanasia due to suffering and deaths corresponded mostly to the development of large mammary tumors. This was observed independently of the cancer grade but according to impact on morbidity. These appeared to be related to the various treatments when compared to the control groups. These tumors are generally known to be mostly estrogen-dependent [63]. We observed a strikingly marked induction of mammary tumors in groups administered R alone, even at the very lowest dose (50 ng/L G equivalent dilution in adjuvants). At this concentration in vitro, G alone is known to induce human breast cancer cell growth via estrogen receptors [64]. In addition, R with adjuvants has been shown to disrupt aromatase, which synthesizes estrogen [19], and to interfere with estrogen and androgen receptors in cells [8]. Furthermore, R appears to be a sex endocrine disruptor in vivo in males [10]. Sex steroid levels were also modified in treated rats in our study. These hormone-dependent phenomena are confirmed by enhanced pituitary dysfunction in treated females. An estrogen-modified feedback mechanism may act at this level [65,66]. The similar pathological profiles provoked by the GM maize + R diet may thus be explained at least in part by R residues present in this feed. In this regard, it is noteworthy that the medium dose of the R treatment tested (400 mg/Kg G equivalent) corresponds to acceptable residue levels of this pesticide in some edible GMOs.

Interestingly and perhaps surprisingly, in the groups of animals fed with the NK603 GM maize without R application, similar effects with respect to enhanced tumor incidence and mortality rates were observed. For instance, comparing the 11% GMO-treated female group to the controls, the assumption that the tumors are equally distributed is rejected with a level of significance of 0.54% with the Westlake exceedance test [67]. The classical tests of Kolmogorov-Smirnov (one-sided) and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney reach α values of significance, which are respectively of 1.40% and 2.62%.

A possible explanation for this finding is the production of specific compound(s) in the GM feed that are either directly toxic and/or cause the inhibition of pathways, which in turn generates toxic effects. This is despite the fact that the variety of GM maize used in this study was judged by industry and regulators as being substantially equivalent to the corresponding non-GM closest isogenic line [3,30]. As the total chemical composition of the GM maize has not been measured in detail, the use of substantial equivalence as a concept in risk assessment is insufficient to highlight potential unknown toxins and therefore cannot replace long-term animal feeding trials for GMOs.

A cause of the ill effects resulting from NK603 GM maize alone observed in this study could be the fact that it is engineered to overexpress a modified version of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS-CP4) [3], which confers R tolerance. The modified EPSPS is not inhibited by G, in contrast to the wild-type enzyme in the crop. This enzyme is known to drive the first step of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in the plant shikimate pathway. In addition, estrogenic isoflavones and their glycosides are also products of this pathway [68]. A limited compositional analysis showed that these biochemical pathways were not disturbed in the GM maize used in our study. However, our analysis did reveal that the levels of caffeic and ferulic acids in the GM diet, which are also secondary metabolites of the plant shikimate pathway, but not always measured in regulatory tests, were significantly reduced. This may lower their protective effects against carcinogenesis and mammalian tumor formation [69,70]. Moreover, these phenolic acids, and in particular ferulic acid, may modulate estrogen receptors or the estrogenic pathway in mammalian cells [71]. This does not exclude the possibility of the action of other unknown metabolites. This explanation also corresponds to the fact that the observed effects of NK603 GM maize and R were not additive but reached a threshold. This implies that both the NK603 maize and R may cause hormonal disturbances in the same biochemical and physiological pathways.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the consumption of NK603 GM maize with or without R application or R alone gave similar pathologies in male and female rats fed over a 2-year period. It was previously known that G consumption in water above authorized limits may provoke hepatic and kidney failure [33]. The results of the study presented here clearly indicate that lower levels of complete agricultural G herbicide formulations, at concentrations well below officially set safety limits, can induce severe hormone-dependent mammary, hepatic, and kidney disturbances. Similarly, disruption of biosynthetic pathways that may result from overexpression of the EPSPS transgene in the GM NK603 maize can give rise to comparable pathologies that may be linked to abnormal or unbalanced phenolic acid metabolites or related compounds. Other mutagenic and metabolic effects of the edible GMO cannot be excluded. This will be the subject of future studies, including analyses of transgene, G and other R residue presence in rat tissues. Reproductive and multigenerational studies will also provide novel insight into these problems. This study represents the first detailed documentation of long-term deleterious effects arising from consumption of a GMO, specifically a R-tolerant maize, and of R, the most widely used herbicide worldwide.

Taken together, the significant biochemical disturbances and physiological failures documented in this work reveal the pathological effects of these GMO and R treatments in both sexes, with different amplitudes. They also show that the conclusion of the Monsanto authors [3] that the initial indications of organ toxicity found in their 90-day experiment were not ‘biologically meaningful’ is not justifiable.

We propose that agricultural edible GMOs and complete pesticide formulations must be evaluated thoroughly in long-term studies to measure their potential toxic effects.

Methods

Ethics

The experimental protocol was conducted in an animal care unit authorized by the French Ministries of Agriculture and Research (Agreement Number A35-288-1). Animal experiments were performed according to ethical guidelines of animal experimentations (CEE 86/609 regulation), including the necessary observations of all tumors, in line with the requirements for a long-term toxicological study [32], up to a size where euthanasia on ethical grounds was necessary.

Concerning the cultivation of the maize used in this study, no specific permits were required. This is because the maize was grown (MON-00603-6 commonly named NK603) in Canada, where it is authorized for unconfined release into the environment and for use as a livestock feed by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (Decision Document 2002-35). We confirm that the cultivation did not involve endangered or protected species. The GM maize was authorized for import and consumption into the European Union (CE 258/97 regulation).

Plants, diets, and chemicals

The varieties of maize used in this study were the DKC 2678 R-tolerant NK603 (Monsanto Corp., USA), and its nearest isogenic non-transgenic control DKC 2675. These two types of maize were grown under similar normal conditions, in the same location, spaced at sufficient distance to avoid cross-contamination. The genetic nature, as well as the purity of the GM seeds and harvested material, was confirmed by qPCR analysis of DNA samples. One field of NK603 was treated with R at 3 L ha−1 (WeatherMAX, 540 g/L of G, EPA Reg. 524-537), and another field of NK603 was not treated with R. Corn cobs were harvested when the moisture content was less than 30% and were dried at a temperature below 30°C. From these three cultivations of maize, laboratory rat chow was made based on the standard diet A04 (Safe, France). The dry rat feed was made to contain 11%, 22%, or 33% of GM maize, cultivated either with or without R, or 33% of the non-transgenic control line. The concentrations of the transgene were confirmed in the three doses of each diet by qPCR. All feed formulations consisted of balanced diets, chemically measured as substantially equivalent except for the transgene, with no contaminating pesticides over standard limits. All secondary metabolites cannot be known and measured in the composition. However, we measured isoflavones and phenolic acids including ferulic acid by standard HPLC-UV. All reagents used were of analytical grade. The herbicide diluted in the drinking water was the commercial formulation of R (GT Plus, 450 g/L of G, approval 2020448, Monsanto, Belgium). Herbicide levels were assessed by G measurements in the different dilutions by mass spectrometry.

Animals and treatments

Virgin albino Sprague-Dawley rats at 5 weeks of age were obtained from Harlan (Gannat, France). All animals were kept in polycarbonate cages (820 cm2, Genestil, France) with two animals of the same sex per cage. The litter (Toplit classic, Safe, France) was replaced twice weekly. The animals were maintained at 22 ± 3°C under controlled humidity (45% to 65%) and air purity with a 12 h-light/dark cycle, with free access to food and water. The location of each cage within the experimental room was regularly changed. This 2-year life-long experiment was conducted in a Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) accredited laboratory according to OECD guidelines. After 20 days of acclimatization, 100 male and 100 female animals were randomly assigned on a weight basis into ten equivalent groups. For each sex, one control group had access to plain water and standard diet from the closest isogenic non-transgenic maize control; six groups were fed with 11%, 22%, and 33% of GM NK603 maize either treated or not treated with R. The final three groups were fed with the control diet and had access to water supplemented with respectively 1.1 × 10−8% of R (0.1 ppb or 50 ng/L of G, the contaminating level of some regular tap waters), 0.09% of R (400 mg/kg G, US MRL of 400 ppm G in some GM feed), and 0.5% of R (2.25 g/L G, half of the minimal agricultural working dilution). This was changed weekly. Twice-weekly monitoring allowed careful observation and palpation of animals, recording of clinical signs, measurement of any tumors, food and water consumption, and individual body weights.

Anatomopathology

Animals were sacrificed during the course of the study only if necessary because of suffering according to ethical rules (such as 25% body weight loss, tumors over 25% body weight, hemorrhagic bleeding, or prostration) and at the end of the study by exsanguination under isoflurane anesthesia. In each case, detailed observations and anatomopathology was performed and the following organs were collected: brain, colon, heart, kidneys, liver, lungs, ovaries, spleen, testes, adrenals, epididymis, prostate, thymus, uterus, aorta, bladder, bone, duodenum, esophagus, eyes, ileum, jejunum, lymph nodes, lymphoreticular system, mammary glands, pancreas, parathyroid glands, Peyer’s patches, pituitary, salivary glands, sciatic nerve, skin, spinal cord, stomach, thyroid, and trachea. The first 14 organs (at least ten per animal depending on the sex, Table 1) were weighted, plus any tumors that arose. The first nine were divided into two parts and one half was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen/carbonic ice. The remaining parts including other organs were rinsed in PBS and stored in 4% formalin before anatomopathological study. These samples were used for further paraffin-embedding, slides, and HES histological staining. For transmission electron microscopy, the kidneys, livers, and tumors were cut into 1 mm3 fragments. Samples were fixed in pre-chilled 2% paraformaldehyde/2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS pH 7.4 at 4°C for 3 h and processed as previously described [13].

Biochemical analyses

Blood samples were collected from the tail vein of each rat under short isoflurane anesthesia before treatment and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months: 11 measurements were obtained for each animal alive at 2 years. It was first demonstrated that anesthesia did not impact animal health. Two aliquots of plasma and serum were prepared and stored at −80°C. Then, 31 parameters were assessed (Table 1) according to standard methods including hematology and coagulation parameters, albumin, globulin, total protein concentration, creatinine, urea, calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, inorganic phosphorus, triglycerides, glucose, total cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl-transferase (GT), estradiol, and testosterone. In addition, at months 12 and 24, the C-reactive protein was assayed. Urine samples were collected similarly 11 times, over 24 h in individual metabolic cages, and 16 parameters were quantified including creatinine, phosphorus, potassium, chloride, sodium, calcium, pH, and clearance. Liver samples taken at the end made it possible to perform assays of CYP1A1, 1A2, 3A4, 2C9 activities in S9 fractions, with glutathione S-transferase and gamma-GT.

Statistical analysis

In this study, multivariate analyses were more appropriate than pairwise comparisons between groups because the parameters were very numerous, with samples of ten individuals. Kaplan-Meyer comparisons, for instance, were not used because these are better adapted to epidemiological studies. Differences in the numbers of mammary tumors were studied by a non-parametric multiple comparisons Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by a post hoc Dunn’s test with the GraphPad Prism 5 software.

Biochemical data were treated by multivariate analysis with the SIMCA-P (V12) software (UMETRICS AB Umea, Sweden). The use of chemometrics tools, for example, principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares to latent structures (PLS), and orthogonal PLS (OPLS), are robust methods for modeling, analyzing, and interpreting complex chemical and biological data. OPLS is a recent modification of the PLS method. PLS is a regression method used in order to find the relationship between two data tables referred to as X and Y. PLS regression [72] analysis consists in calculating by means of successive iterations, linear combinations of the measured X-variables (predictor variables). These linear combinations of X-variables give PLS components (score vectors t). A PLS component can be thought of as a new variable – a latent variable – reflecting the information in the original X-variables that is of relevance for modeling and predicting the response Y-variable by means of the maximization of the square of covariance (Max cov2(X,Y)). The number of components is determined by cross validation. SIMCA software uses the nonlinear iterative partial least squares algorithm (NIPALS) for the PLS regression. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was used in this study [73,74].

The purpose of discriminant analysis is to find a model that separates groups of observations on the basis of their X variables. The X matrix consists of the biochemical data. The Y matrix contains dummy variables which describe the group membership of each observation. Binary variables are used in order to encode a group identity. Discriminant analysis finds a discriminant plan in which the projected observations are well separated according to each group. The objective of OPLS is to divide the systematic variation in the X-block into two model parts, one linearly related to Y (in the case of a discriminant analysis, the group membership), and the other one unrelated (orthogonal) to Y. Components related to Y are called predictive, and those unrelated to Y are called orthogonal. This partitioning of the X data results in improved model transparency and interpretability [75]. Prior to analysis, variables were mean-centered and unit variance scaled.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests, and that, in contrast with regulatory assessments for GMOs and pesticides, they are independent from companies developing these products.

Authors’ contributions

GES directed and with JSV designed and coordinated the study. EC, RM, SG, and ND analyzed the data, compiled the literature, and participated in the drafting of the manuscript and final version. MM performed transmission electron microscopy. DH performed OPLS-DA statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Antoniou for English assistance, editing, and constructive comments on the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the Association CERES, for research on food quality, representing more than 50 companies and private donations, the Foundation ‘Charles Leopold Mayer pour le Progrès de l′Homme’, the French Ministry of Research, and CRIIGEN for their major support.

(2003) Opinion of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms on a request from the commission related to the safety of foods and food ingredients derived from herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize NK603 for which a request for placing on the market was submitted under Article 4 of the Novel Food Regulation (EC) No 258/97 by Monsanto (QUESTION NO EFSA-Q-2003-002). EFSA J 9:1-14

Hmmmm, last I checked the sovereign Nation of Syria had invited only two countries to enter and assist in the eradication of ISIS . Russia and Iran.

It is curious that in the short time period that Russia has been involved they have done more to eradicate the scourge infecting Syria than the US had done in the two years it has been leading this alleged ‘anti-ISIS’ coalition.

So my question is what right does the US have to stipulate any demands or requirements of Russia? When they have been invited by a sovereign Nation. The US, however, has basically entered said sovereign Nation of it’s own accord to tell them who should be in charge.

Not to mention claiming victories against ISIS while using videos of airstrikes that are essentially Russian. Making it very clear that the US has no footage to backup their claims. Quite the contrary they have been accused of not only backing ISIS but having created it.

The Russian campaign in Syria has brought to light just how inept the alleged US led campaign truly is. As well as the discrepancies in the reports given by US officials. For the most part fairy tales and fabrication!

Russia is not welcome to join the US-led coalition in Syria, as France has proposed, until it changes its “focus” and stops “propping up” President Assad, the US State Department said. Yet, Washington continues to insist their goal isn’t defeating Assad.

“If other nations not in the coalition [the US-led coalition] want to join it and become part of it and focus on the fight against ISIL [Islamic State/IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL] that’s a conversation we’re certainly willing to have,” US State Department spokesperson John Kirby said.

An appeal to expand the US-led coalition fighting Islamic State came from French President Francois Hollande three days after deadly attacks in Paris a week ago. Stating that “France is at war,” Hollande called for the creation of a “large coalition,” which could unite forces with Russia “to achieve a result that has taken too long.”

The grand coalition is going to be the focus of separate talks President Hollande will have with his American and Russian counterparts in coming days. The French leader is expected to hold talks in Washington on November 24 and in Moscow on November 26.

However, the US State Department says that Russia’s involvement in the coalition would depend on Moscow’s “commitment.”

“But in order for that to work, every member of the coalition has to have the same focus on defeating ISIL, and thus far we, talking about Russia, haven’t seen that same commitment,” Kirby said, referring to Russia’s support for the Syrian President Bashar Assad. “It’s inconsistent with the goals of the coalition, which is to defeat ISIL, if you’re also propping up the Assad regime.”

UN approves ‘all necessary measures’ to fight IS

AFP

Soldiers prepare a Rafale war plane on the deck of France’s nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, at its home port of Toulon, southern France, Wednesday, Nov.18, 2015. France has decided to…

The UN Security Council on Friday authorized countries to “take all necessary measures” to fight the Islamic State group in a resolution that won unanimous backing a week after the Paris attacks.

The measure drafted by France calls on all UN member states to “redouble and coordinate their efforts to prevent and suppress terrorist attacks” committed by IS and other extremist groups linked to Al-Qaeda.

French President Francois Hollande welcomed the adoption, saying the resolution would “help mobilise nations to eliminate Daesh” (IS), which has claimed responsibility for the attacks that left 130 dead in Paris.

Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said countries should now find concrete ways to shore up the fight, “either through military action, the search for political solutions or the battle against terrorist financing.”

French President Francois Hollande has called the Paris attacks an ‘act of war’ by the Islamic State and called on the global community to step up its fight against the terrorist regime by bombing Syria. Simone Del Rosario reports from Paris.

Based on President Obama’s defiant (“I know better than everyone”) defensive crouch at his post-Paris attacks G-20 Turkey press conference don’t expect a sea change in White House policy against ISIS. Just think of more sloppy spit across the ISIS swamp. Better yet, designate it “Leading From As Far Behind as Possible, Version 2.0.”

It was Obama at his most unappealing – setting up the red herrings and imaginary (if not imaginative) policy alibis that is his want in a vain attempt to silence his growing chorus of ISIS critics. The president’s stubborn insistence that anyone daring to challenge his failing, slap-dash anti-ISIS strategy that has squandered so much and produced so little is merely playing politics: “W” wannabees bent on repeating the historical error of the Iraq invasion.

If only, as Obama whined in Anatalya, his ISIS critics would cease engaging in petty “political games or offering shallow solutions…” by challenging him on ISIS, life would be well and good for all. It’s akin to him asserting that between birth and death there is nothing in between, case closed!

Smearing anyone who smells the malodorous odor of a failing Syria/Iraq/ISIS policy a mile away is a self-serving falsehood Obama frequently resorts to when cornered. By persisting in this un-presidential conduct Mr. Obama camouflages his own failures no longer able to be hidden – sinking to the low level of Politician-in-Chief rather than rising to a respected Commander-in-Chief as ISIS pounds at our doorstep.

French prosecutor: 9th suspect in Paris terror attacks being sought

France made an unprecedented demand Tuesday that its European Union allies support its military action against the Islamic State group after the attacks in Paris.

by Tiffany Wilson

Tuesday, November 17, 2015 03:33PM

GERMANY (KGO) —

Authorities are seeking a ninth suspect in Friday’s attacks in Paris, a French prosecutor’s spokeswoman told ABC News. The spokeswoman did not reveal any details about the suspect’s identity.

France took unprecedented action Tuesday when it invoked the Mutual-Defense article of the EU Treaty. Now all 28 member nations must help France in its war against ISIS.

French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said all 27 of France’s EU partners responded positively, and they could help “either by taking part in France’s operations in Syria or Iraq, or by easing the load or providing support for France in other operations.”

“Every country said: I am going to assist, I am going to help,” Drian said.

Arriving for talks in Brussels with his EU counterparts, Greek Defense Minister Panagiotis Kammenos told reporters that the Paris attacks were a game-changer for the bloc.

“This is Sept. 11 for Europe,” he said.

French President Francois Hollande has vowed to forge a united coalition capable of defeating the jihadists at home and abroad. NATO allies were sharing intelligence and working closely with France, NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg said.

Noting that victims of the Paris attacks came from at least 19 nations, Hollande says the international community, led by the U.S. and Russia, must overcome their deep-seated divisions over Syria to destroy IS on its home turf.

French warplanes pounded Islamic State positions in Syria on Sunday as police in Europe widened their investigations into coordinated attacks in Paris that killed more than 130 people.

Islamic State has claimed responsibility for Friday’s suicide bombings and shootings, which have re-ignited a row over Europe’s refugee crisis and drawn calls to block a huge influx of Muslim asylum-seekers.

French police have launched an international hunt for a Belgian-born man they believe helped organize the assaults with two of his brothers. One of the brothers died in the attacks, while the second one is under arrest in Belgium, a judicial source said.

A further two French suicide attackers have been identified, police said, while the identity of four other assailants, who all died in the violence, was still under review.

France has been bombing Islamic State positions in Iraq and Syria for months as part of a U.S.-led operation. Following Friday’s mayhem, Paris vowed to destroy the group. Underlining its resolve, French jets on Sunday launched their biggest raids in Syria to date, hitting its stronghold in Raqqa.

“The raid … including 10 fighter jets, was launched simultaneously from the United Arab Emirates and Jordan. Twenty bombs were dropped,” the Defence Ministry said. Among the targets were a munitions depot and training camp, it said.

French Warplanes Strike Islamic State Militants in Syria

PARIS — French warplanes struck Islamic State militants in Syria on Sunday, a French government official said, two days after attackers linked to the terrorist group carried out a coordinated assault on Paris that killed 129 people.

Prior to the attack on Paris, France had been sparing in its strikes against targets in Syria.

News reports in France said the airstrikes were focused on Raqqa, the city in northern Syria that is the self-proclaimed capital of the Islamic State.

The attackers in Friday’s terrorist assault in Paris communicated at some point beforehand with known members of the Islamic State in Syria, officials on both sides of the Atlantic say, adding evidence to the assertions that the radical group coordinated or helped carry out the attacks rather than simply inspired them.

President François Hollande of France has characterized the attacks as “an act of war” carried out by the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL. He provided no specific information, but the Islamic State released statements on Saturday claiming responsibility for the attacks, part of increasing indications that the group is becoming more capable of extending its reach far beyond its base in Syria and Iraq.

ISIS Declares Provinces Across the Region

If investigators determine that the Islamic State is responsible for the catastrophic attacks in Paris, as the group claims and France alleges, the assaults represent a major leap in the group’s abilities.

Until now, the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, has relied mainly on “lone wolf” followers to attack the West, with relatively low-tech assaults — shootings, the taking of hostages, hit-and-runs — that draw wide attention but do not cause mass casualties.

“This is much different than a normal lone wolf inspired attack,” said Patrick M. Skinner, a former C.I.A. operations officer now with the Soufan Group, a security consultancy. “This was choreographed.”

“The fact that they could do this, especially in Paris, where the intelligence service is really good, clearly there’s a hole somewhere,” Mr. Skinner said.

The Islamic State has been expanding beyond its base in Iraq and Syria since it declared a caliphate, or Islamic state, in June 2014. The group is focused on three parallel tracks, according to Harleen Gambhir, an analyst at the Institute for the Study of War:

inciting regional conflict with attacks in Iraq and Syria;

building relationships with jihadist groups that can carry out military operations across the Middle East and North Africa;

and inspiring, and sometimes helping, ISIS sympathizers to conduct attacks in the West.

“The goal,” Ms. Gambhir said, “is that through these regional affiliates and through efforts to create chaos in the wider world, the organization will be able to expand, and perhaps incite a global apocalyptic war.”

The terror group warned in a Saturday statement that France “will remain at the top of the list of targets of the Islamic State” and claimed that eight of its fighters stormed carefully chosen targets in the “capital of adultery and vice.”

One of the fighters, who was killed in a suicide bomb, had a Syrian passport on him, officials said.

Officials in Greece said that passport belonged to a migrant who had entered Europe in October through Leros, one of the islands that tens of thousands of people fleeing war and poverty in Syria and elsewhere have been using as a gateway to the European Union in recent months.

It’s not clear if the passport belonged to the fighter or if it was stolen from a refugee.

Another one of the terrorists was a 30-year-old French national who had been on authorities’ radar since 2010 for his ties to Islamic extremism, officials said.

Devastation in France: What We Know About The Paris Attacks

A wave of devastating attacks on civilians across Paris Friday night has left at least 129 dead, including an American, and many more injured.

As France initiates a state of emergency and begins several days of mourning, here is a breakdown of what we know so far:

Where

Six separate attacks were carried out across Paris, beginning after 10 p.m. local time Friday night.

One of the targets was the Stade de France soccer stadium, where Germany was playing France in a game that French President Francois Hollande was attending. Hollande was evacuated from the stadium.

Christophe Ena/AP Photo

A French supporter reacts after invading the pitch of the Stade de France stadium at the end of a soccer match between France and Germany in Saint Denis, outside Paris, Nov. 13, 2015.more +

At least 80 were killed inside the Bataclan concert hall, where American rock band Eagles of Death Metal was playing. A witness in the theater told ABC News she heard gunmen shout “Syria!”

The four other attacks were at other locations in the 10th and 11th districts of Paris, where gunmen targeted bars and restaurants. Police said some attackers first sprayed cafes outside the venue with machine gunfire before continuing the assault inside the concert hall.

Thibault Camus/AP Photo

A woman is evacuated from the Bataclan theater after a shooting in Paris, Nov. 13, 2015.

The world is mourning with France, the victims of Friday’s terror assaults in Paris that claimed the lives of at least 129 people. Security has been tightened up globally as Islamic State, who claimed responsibility for the massacre, threatened more violence.

14 November 2015

21:46 GMT

A second person who was reportedly involved in the Paris massacre is “very likely” to have entered European Union via Greece, sources in the Greek government told Reuters. Earlier Greece’s deputy minister in charge of police said a Syrian man whose passport was found at one of the suicide bombing sites made it to the EU through Greece in October.

21:33 GMT

A spokesman for the Accor hotel chain, which operates the Pullman Hotel, also confirmed that the earlier incident was a false bomb alert.

21:24 GMT

A spokesman for the French Interior Ministry has told Reuters that the incident at the hotel in the center of Paris was a false alarm.

21:22 GMT

Heavily armed police have been deployed at the Pullman Hotel in Paris’ 15th district, according to witnesses, who said the officers were searching through rooms. An evacuation has also been reported to have taken place near the Eiffel Tower.

21:08 GMT

Police in Paris have evacuated an area around the Eiffel tower, Reuters reports, citing witnesses.

French President Hollande has declared a state of emergency across the country as Paris comes to grip with a series of terrorist attacks that led to the death of 127 people in the capital, which was placed under curfew for the first time since World War II.

RT interviewed several analysts for their opinions on what these deadly coordinated attacks in the French capital mean not only for the freedom of movement across Europe, but for the ongoing Syrian military operation, which has brought together various state actors – including the US and Russia – in an increasingly shrinking and volatile military theater.

Alain Corvez, Former Advisor to French Interior Ministry, provided insight into the question as to how it is possible that Islamic State has such a long reach – right into the very heart of Europe.

Corvez believes these attacks are “linked to the geopolitical system, and what we are doing in Iraq and in Syria is directly linked to attacks.”

I think all of the specialists and experts on terrorism knew that such an attack was possible,” he continued. “This is a world war against terrorists that we have to wage. And for the first time, President Hollande said we have to fight terrorism on a larger scale.”

‘France has been intervening in the Middle East since 1917’

Washington-based defense analyst Ivan Eland, asked whether this was the right time for nations to put aside their differences and join together in the fight against terrorism, he explained that it is important to consider the problem long-term it is important to ask “what are the root causes of this terrorism – we call them “blanket terrorism” – but there’s many different groups in the world with many different causes and most of them tend to be local causes, which become international causes when Western countries, or other countries, intervene where they shouldn’t.”

“France has been intervening in the Middle East since after World War I, when Britain and France divided it; it was the colonial master in Syria and now it’s taking a fairly assertive policy by bombing in Syria.

The Paris attacks are reminiscent to the terrorist gun spree in Mumbai in 2008, when separate groups of gunmen went on a shooting spree at different locations across the city. This tactic is a brutally efficient form of terrorism, Rice said.

The series of apparent Islamic State attacks in Paris can be compared to the 2001 destruction of the WTC towers in the US, says Jack Rice, a former CIA officer. The French capital is an iconic European city, and terrorists target icons.

France has suffered one of the worst tragedies in its modern history with more than 150 people reported killed in seven separate gun and bomb attacks throughout the capital. The terrorist group Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) claimed responsibility for the attacks.

“Part of the strength that a terrorist group has is to take down an icon,” Rice told RT. “If we go back to 9/11 in the United States, they took down the World Trade Center and parts of New York. And we’ve seen efforts around the world to do similar things.

Friends and Sponsors

The Animal Rescue Site

The Hunger Site – Your click helps to feed the hungry

Wheatgrass Kits.com

FAIR USE NOTICE

The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.

Any materials (ie. graphics, articles , commentary) that are original to this blog are copyrighted and signed by it's creator. Said original material may be shared with attribution. Please respect the work that goes into these items and give the creator his/her credit. Just as we share articles , graphics and photos always giving credit to their creators when available. Credit and a link back to the original source is required.

If you have an issue with anything posted here or would prefer we not use it . Please contact me. Any items that are requested to be removed by the copyright owner will be removed immediately. No threats needed or lawsuit required. If there is a problem and you do not wish your work to be showcased then we will happily find an alternative from the many sources readily available from creators who would find it amenable to having their work presented to the subscribers of this feed.