Atlantis has been discovered?!

From the previous post it is pointed out with sufficient evidence that Egypt was a colony of Atlantis. And wouldn't you know, RA was one, if not the
first god and founder.

In Sumerian tales Enki was Poseidon who lived in Atlantis. Enki had a son by the name of Marduk. In Egyptian that translates to RA. RA has a
symbol, I believe, that depicts where he was from. And it also shows the location of his heritage.

That symbol has many names but generally called "The Eye of Ra". Its alterative name is "All Seeing Eye". No pun intended. Or the "Eye of Africa".

The two rivers that flow from the Eye are filled with sand, and not readily viewable, but are there.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
From the previous post it is pointed out with sufficient evidence that Egypt was a colony of Atlantis. And wouldn't you know, RA was one, if not the
first god and founder.

In Sumerian tales Enki was Poseidon who lived in Atlantis. Enki had a son by the name of Marduk. In Egyptian that translates to RA. RA has a
symbol, I believe, that depicts where he was from. And it also shows the location of his heritage.

That symbol has many names but generally called "The Eye of Ra". Its alterative name is "All Seeing Eye". No pun intended. Or the "Eye of Africa".

The two rivers that flow from the Eye are filled with sand, and not readily viewable, but are there.

Basically this.

Or The Eye of Horus. Horus sacrificed an Eye to save his father. It doesn't matter, it's all the same and comes from the same source.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
From the previous post it is pointed out with sufficient evidence that Egypt was a colony of Atlantis. And wouldn't you know, RA was one, if not the
first god and founder.

In Sumerian tales Enki was Poseidon who lived in Atlantis. Enki had a son by the name of Marduk. In Egyptian that translates to RA. RA has a
symbol, I believe, that depicts where he was from. And it also shows the location of his heritage.

That symbol has many names but generally called "The Eye of Ra". Its alterative name is "All Seeing Eye". No pun intended. Or the "Eye of Africa".

The two rivers that flow from the Eye are filled with sand, and not readily viewable, but are there.

Basically this.

Or The Eye of Horus. Horus sacrificed an Eye to save his father. It doesn't matter, it's all the same and comes from the same source.

Atlantis.

The Eye of Africa.

The All Seeing Eye.

Frankly, it's #ing Incredible!

Yes, both names with different meaning, Eye of Ra is negative, Eye of Horus is positive. But both symbolize the origin of the train of thought.

In the second video I present for consideration is information that quite frankly is unbelievable, but none the less has a high probability of being
true. I am not prepared to give evidence to it presently.

Two video documentaries explaining the connections between Atlantis and Egypt.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
From the previous post it is pointed out with sufficient evidence that Egypt was a colony of Atlantis. And wouldn't you know, RA was one, if not the
first god and founder.

Based on Ignatius Donnely's mash up of fraudulent medium Helena Blavatsky's imagination.

Hardly "sufficient evidence."
Donnelly was a retired politician that wrote that book from his home, never having visited any of the places he talks about, much less researching any
of them.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
In Sumerian tales Enki was Poseidon who lived in Atlantis. Enki had a son by the name of Marduk. In Egyptian that translates to RA. RA has a
symbol, I believe, that depicts where he was from. And it also shows the location of his heritage.

Enki was not Poseidon, and I'd love to see your translation of "Marduk" into "Ra."

Perhaps you should take note that Enki was not like Poseidon at all, and Marduk was not like Ra at all, in the attributes ascribed to them by the very
people that believed in them.

originally posted by: All Seeing EyeThat symbol has many names but generally called "The Eye of Ra". Its alterative name
is "All Seeing Eye". No pun intended. Or the "Eye of Africa".

The two rivers that flow from the Eye are filled with sand, and not readily viewable, but are there.

There is no connection between the "all seeing eye" and the eye of Ra (or the eye of Horus either.) Also, the eye of Ra was in fact not a symbol for
Ra, but was actually a goddess in it's own right - Ra's daughter.

Obviously, you can type anything you want. You can also expect me to call you out when you make crap up.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Ahhh yes, and then there are the "Secret Society" enforcers who shoot down everything outside the box.

They all have the same mottis operandi in their operations. Argument, personal attacks, and insults. Their message translated "shut up, get back in
the box, and don't ask questions"

But they are right, the "All seeing Eye", the real one, the original one, is Divine!

Sorry, I wont be getting back in the box. Well, until I die anyways LOL LOL

Note the personal attacks, without offering anything remotely considered Mature or constructive. They degrade into temper tantrums because no one is
buying into the garbage.

Case in point, John Anthony West and Dr Robert Schoch. Their sin was to claim the Sphinx was much older than the Secret Societies want you to
consider. Even though they proved their case with "Evidence"! No, dont look at the evidence, jusy keep pounding the status quoe version.

I'm not even going to reply to them, unless they offer, Evidence, in a mature manner.

Maybe Ill try and get Dr Schoch to look at the erosion patterns in the Eye, see what he has to say about it.

...
Where are you now
Where are you now
Where are you now
Was it all in my fantasy
Where are you now
Were you only imaginary
Where are you now
Atlantis
Under the sea
Under the sea
Where are you now
Another dream
The monsters running wild inside of me
I'm faded
I'm faded
So lost
I'm faded
I'm faded
So lost
I'm faded
...

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Ahhh yes, and then there are the "Secret Society" enforcers who shoot down everything outside the box.

They all have the same mottis operandi in their operations. Argument, personal attacks, and insults. Their message translated "shut up, get back in
the box, and don't ask questions"

But they are right, the "All seeing Eye", the real one, the original one, is Divine!

Sorry, I wont be getting back in the box. Well, until I die anyways LOL LOL

Note the personal attacks, without offering anything remotely considered Mature or constructive. They degrade into temper tantrums because no one is
buying into the garbage.

Looks like according to you, "constructive" means agreeing with you.
You flat out lied about the Eye of Ra. It was pointed out with factual information.
But according to you, my saying so is a "personal attack."
You don't like being called out for what you did? Then don't do it.

Don't make crap up and post it as if it were true.
See, they call that "lying."

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Case in point, John Anthony West and Dr Robert Schoch. Their sin was to claim the Sphinx was much older than the Secret Societies want you to
consider. Even though they proved their case with "Evidence"! No, dont look at the evidence, jusy keep pounding the status quoe version.

I seriously doubt you even know what "evidence" Schoch provided. At any rate, it certainly didn't "prove" anything at all and has been roundly
dismissed by... wait for it... GEOLOGISTS.

“When Marduk [now called Ra], after a long absence, to the Land of the Two Narrows [Egypt] returned, Ningishzidda [called Thoth in Egypt] as its
master he there found. With the aid of offspring of the Anunnaki [astronauts from Nibiru] who Earthlings espoused did Ningishzidda the land oversee,
what Marduk had once planned and instructed by Ningishzidda was overturned.”

For the next 350 years, the armies of brothers Marduk/Ra and Nigishzidda/Thoth clashed over Egypt. Finally, Enki, their father, known in Egypt as
Ptah, ordered Thoth to Leave Egypt to Ra.

Sitchin, Z.
1976, The 12th Planet
1983, The Stairway to Heaven
1985, The Wars of Gods and Men
1990, Genesis Revisited
1990, The Lost Realms
1993, When Time Began
1995, Divine Encounters
2002, The Lost Book of Enki
2004, The Earth Chronicles Expeditions
2007, The End of Days
2007, Journeys to the Mythical Past
2010, There Were Giants Upon The Earth: Gods, Demigods and Human Ancestry:
The Evidence of Alien DNA
Strauss, B.,
2006, The Trojan War

Its called differing opinion, not lying. I believe our ancient history is hidden from us by greedy, lying, hypocritical, selfish secret society
members!!

I believe there actually was a ancient species who humanity called "gods", who traveled the solar system, who are still with us today. Lie? No, just
different than what the history books teach. It is not I, who lie!

Added:

I suspect all this name changing is part of the "babble", to confuse man. And it sure has!

“When Marduk [now called Ra], after a long absence, to the Land of the Two Narrows [Egypt] returned, Ningishzidda [called Thoth in Egypt] as its
master he there found. With the aid of offspring of the Anunnaki [astronauts from Nibiru] who Earthlings espoused did Ningishzidda the land oversee,
what Marduk had once planned and instructed by Ningishzidda was overturned.”

For the next 350 years, the armies of brothers Marduk/Ra and Nigishzidda/Thoth clashed over Egypt. Finally, Enki, their father, known in Egypt as
Ptah, ordered Thoth to Leave Egypt to Ra.

Sitchin, Z.
1976, The 12th Planet
1983, The Stairway to Heaven
1985, The Wars of Gods and Men
1990, Genesis Revisited
1990, The Lost Realms
1993, When Time Began
1995, Divine Encounters
2002, The Lost Book of Enki
2004, The Earth Chronicles Expeditions
2007, The End of Days
2007, Journeys to the Mythical Past
2010, There Were Giants Upon The Earth: Gods, Demigods and Human Ancestry:
The Evidence of Alien DNA
Strauss, B.,
2006, The Trojan War

Its called differing opinion, not lying. I believe our ancient history is hidden from us by greedy, lying, hypocritical, selfish secret society
members!!

I believe there actually was a ancient species who humanity called "gods", who traveled the solar system, who are still with us today. Lie? No, just
different than what the history books teach. It is not I, who lie!

Added:

I suspect all this name changing is part of the "babble", to confuse man. And it sure has!

Oh, and yea, start your attack on the authors...

If you insist.
From the author:

The Anunnaki dictated their world view to Earthling scribes of Iraq (then called Sumer). Clay tablets the gods dictated say that back on Nibiru, a
king and his military ruled. The gods dictated tales of how, 450,000 years ago, they got gold from Earth and how, till 300,000 years ago (when they
created our ancestors for the mines) they shipped the gold back to Nibiru.

It's amazing what people will claim in the twenty first century about what ancient texts say. I mean, the texts are open to be read by the public
nowadays on the internet, unlike how it was back when the author's "mentor" Sitchin was making the above up out of thin air.

There exist NO ancient writings describing humans being created to mine gold for some bunch of gods, extraterrestrial or not. So your source is also a
liar.

There exist NO ancient writings describing humans being created to mine gold for some bunch of gods, extraterrestrial or not. So your source is also a
liar.

Birds of a feather ...

Harte

Great answer Mr. Harte, there is also the problem of reality. You have a technology that can allow 'people' to travel interstellar distances, pretend
to be gods, do DNA modification on a different set of life forms - completely ignore any problem with microbes but they decide with all this high tech
ability to use manual labor to mine gold?

Here is how are present 'low' tech mines gold:

Hardrock (Lode) Mining The vast majority of current gold production comes from commercial hardrock mining operations. In these mines, the gold is
extracted from the rock where it was originally deposited. Some hardrock mines are underground mines. A tunnel is drilled or blasted to the source
of the ore, which is transported out for processing often by truck or rail. A variety of specific techniques can be used for mining the ore,
depending on the geology of the area - such as block caving, which allows massive strip-mine scale underground excavation, or the more steretypical
cut-and-fill and drift-and-fill techniques, where miners dig our out in long horizontal tunnels.

Other hardrock mines are large strip mines that remove the surface dirt and rock and then extract the ore from the resulting open pit. Removal of
ore is often accomplished explosives, enormous power shovels, and massive trucks, some capable of carrying 500 tons of rock in one load. In both
kinds of hardrock mining, the ore is then processed in some manner to remove the gold.

Usually this entails crushing the rock into powder and using some combination of gravity, centrifugation, and "froth flotation" to perform an initial
separation of gold from rock. In many cases this is followed by some form of cyanide treatment to precipitate out the remaining gold. The remaining
ore mud waste is known as "tailings", the disposal of which is one of the largest challenges facing a hardrock mine. Read more:
www.groundtruthtrekking.org...

But you are spouting pure propaganda. Your ignorant and not very bright.
Congratulations on believing everything the history books say lol......
Don't you know everything occult is fake and wrong, magic is fake and everything the history writers tells us is real, Christianity will be you
saviour, why is it the blind always have big stupid mouths.

But you are spouting pure propaganda. Your ignorant and not very bright.
Congratulations on believing everything the history books say lol......

I've only stated what is known, not some historical "opinion."
If you think differently, perhaps you could provide some kind of evidence for why you allow yourself to be deluded.
Instead of just running your big stupid mouth about it.

originally posted by: ManyMasksDon't you know everything occult is fake and wrong, magic is fake

Of course magic is fake. If not, you should be able to demonstrate it, shouldn't you.
Instead of just running your big stupid mouth about it.

originally posted by: ManyMasks and everything the history writers tells us is real, Christianity will be you saviour,
why is it the blind always have big stupid mouths.

And here we go.

Please point out the connection you've imagined between this thread topic, my responses in it, and Christianity.

But you are spouting pure propaganda. Your ignorant and not very bright.
Congratulations on believing everything the history books say lol......
Don't you know everything occult is fake and wrong, magic is fake and everything the history writers tells us is real, Christianity will be you
saviour, why is it the blind always have big stupid mouths.

Occult Magic, is real. They manipulate the mind into believing what isn't real. That's, the magic. But they never address the evidence. If It
doesn't fit the Mythology they pump out, its wrong!

I have noticed at the Richat and surrounding areas an odd distribution of plant life, trees, bushes. They seem to be in areas that were flood runoff
areas.

To the South of the Southern entrance there is a collection, and to the east. These areas are also around the general area. Generally no vegetation
are in the larger, non run off areas.

It makes me wonder that if these were the runoff areas, then it would be logical to assume that what is in these areas, encourage vegetation growth.

In a flood the larger heavier items would fall out of the current first, followed by the lightest items later down the stream. Lighter items such as
wood, clothing, and yes, biological's.

I would guess that these types of items would hold water longer, when water is present, to encourage plant growth. And I doubt there was any effort
in cleaning up, or burying the dead, so they laid in place.

When I look at these patches of bushes, etc, I cant help to think, they are grave stones of a sort. God, may they finally rest in peace...

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.