OK, Roger, let’s get this straight once and for all. I have NEVER said that criticism of Obama automatically makes one a racist. There are, of course, clearly racist criticisms of Obama, but most knocks against him have nothing to do with race.

I’m sick and tired of right-wingers advancing this false claim that counter-arguments against their criticisms of Obama invariably amount to accusations of racism. That’s just B.S.

When I see racist attacks on Obama, I won’t shy from spotlighting them. But I won’t categorize all anti-Obama sentiment as racist.

Your point here that my implied poke at Sarah Palin in this post is sexist is pure rubbish. I have never based any criticism of Palin on her gender or her looks. Others have, I haven’t. I’ve even seen her admirers resort to sexism. Rush Limbaugh, among others, has referred to her as a “babe,” as if her good looks are a measure of her fitness for high office.

What are you talking about? Let me guess. You’re going to come up with a pig picture in connection with the phony rap against Obama in regard to that “lipstick on a pig” thing, and then I’m going to have to explain to you that I have never likened Palin to a pig, and neither has Obama. And then I’ll have to explain the context of Obama’s so-called offensive remark. And then I’m going to have to explain that John McCain once referred to “lipstick on a pig” in his criticism of some proposal from Hillary Clinton. And, in the end, you’re not going to have proven that I ever referred to Palin, by word or picture, as a pig. And then you’ll slink away from the subject, and it won’t come up again until some similarly ill-informed commenter raises the issue.

ROGER: MAYBE IT WILL HELP IF I USE CAPITAL LETTERS IN EXPLAINING THIS. THE PICTURE OF THE PIG WEARING LIPSTICK WAS USED ON A POST THAT HAD TO WITH CONTROVERSY OVER THE WIDELY-USED EXPRESSION ABOUT TRYING TO PUT “LIPSTICK ON A PIG.” THE PICTURE PERFECTLY SUITED THE SUBJECT OF THE POST. ANYBODY WHO READ THE POST WOULD UNDERSTAND THAT THE PICTURE WAS NOT INTENDED TO PORTRAY SARAH PALIN. INDEED, AS THE POST CLEARLY EXPLAINED, NEITHER WAS OBAMA’S REFERENCE TO “LIPSTICK ON A PIG” EVEN AN INDIRECT REFERENCE TO PALIN. THE MCCAIN CAMPAIGN FAILED IN ITS EFFORT TO DISTORT THIS MATTER, JUST AS YOU’RE FAILING IN YOUR FALSE ACCUSATION THAT I PORTRAYED PALIN AS A PIG. NOW, GIVE IT UP. IF YOU’RE SO DENSE THAT YOU CAN’T UNDERSTAND THIS EXPLANATION, I DON’T CARE TO PURSUE THE ARGUMENT ANY FURTHER.

Ain’t that just like a lie-beral defeato-crat to try to turn God’s word into some kind of a joke. I know that Roger knows EXACTLY what I’m talking about. I guess that’s what happens when you kick God outta schools and let homos marry – all of the sudden you gotta Muslim president America becomes a commie, hippie commune with Charles Manson as the overloard.

Pat how come you don’t show any of the good comments and signs from the tea party.

Aren’t you supposed to be fair??

A lot of them were democrats too and independents.

A lot of them had concerns and fears.

whether you want to believe them or not,whether you want to acknowledge them or not, they are real to those people.

You and other lefties seem to not care or make fun of them.

Are you so heartless you do not care about your fellow Americans?

They where not all people from what you call the right.

And if your one of those that says it was all Fox News that put the people up to it you are as crazy as they are.

If Fox News is that powerful and has that much influence over Thousands upon thousand of people you had better hope Fox News does hear of you.
Because if they can do all some of the left accuse them of, they will bury you and others like you.

Roger – I thought you were going to get out in the sunshine and stop blathering on lies Fox News told you.

Are you so heartless you do not care about your fellow Americans?

That’s hilarious. Where how often did you stand up to defend liberals falsely accused of siding with the terrorists? I’m just curious.

As to Fox News, when an anchor says “go to thefoxnation.com to find a tea poopy near you – that’s called sponsorship. It’s not reporting. Can you imagine the outcry if CNN or MSNBC told people where the closet anti-war rally was?

The American President’s call “to free the world of the menace of a nuclear nightmare” was hot air, Mr Sarkozy’s diplomatic staff told him in a report. “It was rhetoric – not a speech on American security policy but an export model aimed at improving the image of the United States,” they said. Most of Mr Obama’s proposals had already been made by the Bush administration and Washington was dragging its feet on disarmament and treaties against nuclear proliferation, the leaked report said.

Beside CNN and MSNBC are struggling just to stay a float because hardly any one watchs then any more.
You you don’t believe its true PINHEAD check. They are in a finacial mess because of very poor rating and viewers.

So Roger takes the side of the French president against the American president (see comment No. 15). Just a few years ago, that would have been considered treason in some quarters. Ah, but that was when our president was a Republican. Now that we have a Democrat in the White House, it’s all right for wingnuts to admire the French, who apparently are no longer cheese-eating surrender monkeys.