Comments on: 22 Well Done State Tourism Websiteshttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/
Web Design, Development, and BusinessMon, 15 Sep 2014 10:57:23 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14By: Zella Isamhttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-30983
Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:03:31 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-30983Many thanks for giving the useful, dependable, revealing as well as fun guidance on the topic to Emily.
]]>By: Benhttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-14600
Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:58:26 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-14600Interesting post and comments. Just to add an international dimension I’d be interested to see how you think http://www.golakes.co.uk (which we built for Cumbria The Lake District – which of course is in England) compares with some great sites you’ve identified. OK, its a smaller area geographically but a fantastic part of the world with tons to do (not that I’m biased!) And pretty rich functionality online as well (definitely not biased!!)
]]>By: Julzhttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-7018
Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:57:37 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-7018I’m not sure if it’s my browser, but the NY one needs more styling. It looks unfinished. Also, the source HTML is really sloppy.
]]>By: DChttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-6398
Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:35:13 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-6398I agree with Lori also. Pretty to look, but mostly unusable. They’ve also got SEO problems. Do a google search for “ohio family travel” (minus the quotes). Your #1 site is ranked 6th, making it essentially invisible.
]]>By: Danhttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-5288
Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:21:13 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-5288I agree with Lori that many of these sites score low on usability. Has anyone ranked these sites based on that criteria?
]]>By: US State Tourism Web Site Design: Two Years On (Part 1) | ClickLogin Web Designhttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-1448
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:48:08 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-1448[...] More recently, Sam Dunn did his own summary of 22 well designed state tourism web sites. [...]
]]>By: Lorihttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-1309
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:30:29 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-1309While the designs of some of your top-ranked web sites are attractive, they are terrible from a standpoint of usability, i.e., trying to actually plan a trip. I tried several of them, and dropped off after less than 2 minutes because it was too difficult to find what I was looking for. Pretty wallpaper is worthless if the structure of the house isn’t sound.
]]>By: Dagliga tips #01 | Webbrelaterathttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-758
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:04:03 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-758[...] 22 Well Done State Tourism Websites Dela med dig Digg / Delicious / StumbleUpon / Reddit [...]
]]>By: Christian Watsonhttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-594
Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:43:23 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-594Sam, interestingly enough, I did a similar post almost exactly a year ago – http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000325.php . It’s interesting to see how some of these sites have improved over the last 12 months.
]]>By: Sam Dunnhttp://buildinternet.com/2009/01/22-well-done-state-tourism-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-552
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:37:39 +0000http://buildinternet.com/?p=800#comment-552@Sean
I selected some of the more attention grabbing websites, the ones that had the wow factor. Although I will say again that some might disagree and it is my opinion here were some criteria:

1. I didn’t feel like an overwhelming amount of information was being thrown at me, the page was laid out with plenty of white space to help digest and separate information.
2. Well done graphics, for instance W. Virgina – http://www.wvtourism.com/, is a little dated looking.
3. If the site intrigued me to actually make a visit.

Those were some key ones, among others. I offer other people to share their opinions as well.