Jean Charest uses debate to attack François Legault's separatist past

MONTREAL — Jean Charest portrayed himself as a staunch defender of Quebec vis-a-vis Ottawa on Tuesday while at the same time trying to paint François Legault as a man who has not renounced his sovereigntist convictions.

The Liberal leader and his rival for the Coalition for Quebec’s Future clashed in a one-hour televised debate two weeks before Quebecers head to the polls in an election that could spell the end of Charest’s career if his party loses power.

With the Coalition eating away at the federalist vote that traditionally goes to the Liberals, Charest’s strategy was clear: try to convince voters that Legault, a former Parti Quebecois cabinet minister, is still resolutely sovereigntist.

“When you go negotiate with Ottawa, who are you going to send?” Charest said. “A federalist or a sovereigntist? When you want to be premier of Quebec, you can’t be in both camps at the same time.”

Legault left the PQ to create his new party, which has no official position on the independence question and promises not to discuss the issue that has dominated Quebec politics since the late 1960s.

Legault has said he will not hold a sovereignty referendum for 10 years and that he would even vote No if a referendum were held right now.

On Tuesday night, he attacked Charest’s nationalist credentials.

When I was in federal politics at the same time, I fought federal cuts to Quebec

“We have been divided in Quebec for 30 years,” he said. “What we need in Quebec is a nationalist government… a government that defends French, defends our culture, that gets our economy going, that can defend our identity. You have failed in your duties.”

“When I was in federal politics at the same time, I fought federal cuts to Quebec,” said the former Conservative leader.

Then Charest trotted out what he called examples of his ability to fight for Quebec: a 70 per cent increase in transfer payments since the Liberals came to power nine years ago; the recognition of Quebec as a nation; an “historic” health agreement; and Quebec being represented at UNESCO as part of the Canadian delegation.

Earlier, Charest cast himself as the best politician to lead Quebec in stormy economic times.

“Quebecers have more money in their pockets than nine years ago,” he told Legault.

“I want to create 250,000 jobs to have full employment.”

Legault fired back that many of the jobs the Liberals have created are low-paying and do not help the province.

“When you came to power in 2003, Quebec was in fourth place (among provinces) in terms of disposable income,” he said. “Now, there’s just Prince Edward Island that is poorer than us.”

The two men kicked off the debate by defending the ethics of their respective parties.

Legault immediately attacked Charest for being too lenient with Tony Tomassi, a Liberal cabinet minister who was responsible for the province’s daycare program.

Tomassi was forced to quit politics and now faces criminal charges over his use of a credit card supplied by a company that received government business.

Charest retorted that he acted quickly once he found out about Tomassi’s activities.

The Liberal leader then challenged Legault to defend Jacques Duchesneau, a Coalition candidate who, according to Radio-Canada, received anonymous financial donations when he was a municipal politician in Montreal in 1998.

That didn’t stop Legault from hammering away at the Liberals’ ethics record over the years.

“We’ve lost the confidence of Quebecers,” he said. “And even on the international level, it’s embarrassing what Mr. Charest has done.”

The Liberal leader shot back that Quebec’s international reputation is intact.

The only debate featuring all the main party leaders on the same stage occurred Sunday night.

The debates are considered a key test for Legault, who has much less experience than his political rivals when it comes to the cut and thrust of political exchanges on live TV.

The former PQ cabinet minister is a pivotal player in the three-way race that has emerged.

His level of support will likely be decisive in many riding battles, with his party in a position to play the role of spoiler even in areas where it’s not likely to win.

The fear of vote-splitting is intense enough on the federalist side that a long-time Liberal organizer in Quebec City is urging party supporters, through different media interviews, to rally behind the Coalition for this one election.

The Coalition is targeting an anglophone electorate that historically votes massively for the Liberals.