When the school asks if my child
could repeat a year, what are the factors to consider?

Taking into account the child's intellectual level

If the child's intellectual level is lower than the average, it is
sometimes important to take an extra year to let the child catch up.
Conversely, sometimes the child's intellectual level is normal or high:
something else causes low academic performance. That cause needs to
be identified. In that case, repeating a year is often not the
appropriate response. The intellectual level is objectified by the intelligence test for
young children (Wppsi), for children who are less than 6 years old
or the intelligence test for
children and adolescents (Wisc) for 6 to 16 year old students. For
an adolescent who is at least 16 years old, psychologists use the intelligence test for adults (Wais).

Taking into account the child's maturity

Another important aspect to consider is the maturity of the
child or adolescent. Is there not going to be too much of a difference
in maturity if the child repeats a year? Personality
tests (Rorschach, CAT, Black Paw, TAT) give a clear idea of the
child's maturity.

A normal decrease in academic results around 13-15 years

Too often, teachers who have difficulty with a student recommend
to begin professional training at an early age. How many 13, 14 or 15 year old teenagers
have
their professional fate decided too early, at an age where bad results
can just be temporary? Repeating a year appears as an alternative to
consider.

The paradoxical school failure of intellectually gifted children

Sometimes, gifted
children can feel bored in class, they may lose interest
and paradoxically experience school failure. In most cases, getting a more appropriate schooling is enough to get out of
school failure.