So, then, the question comes down to whether it's more important to stop the cybersquatters or to avoid harming innocent parties whose claims happen to conflict.

Just like with the old saw, "It's better for 10 criminals to go free than for one innocent person to go to jail," there's a legitimate argument to say "It's better to let 10 cybersquatters stay on the net than to take away 1 legitimately-used domain name."

To me, cybersquatters are a silly annoyance; I wish they'd go away, but am afraid of the baby getting tossed out with the bathwater when a system is set up to "catch" them.