Bombshell! Clinton Foundation was Chelsea Clinton’s ‘nest egg’

A new book does not paint a pretty picture of the Clinton Foundation’s rumored practices, and Chelsea Clinton in particular, who has responded angrily.

The book, Chasing Hillary [link to amzn.to (secure)] , is written by Amy Chozick, a writer for The New York Times. The allegations she makes in her book have made headlines in recent days, and earned a strong denial from Chelsea herself. That includes an anecdote that Chelsea was popping champagne on election night, celebrating her mother’s win before the results started to come in.

That earned this denial from Chelsea, who said the incident never happened. She also says Choznick never contacted her to fact-check the incident.

What remains strange about this (beyond @amychozick never fact checking with me directly) is at that time I was with my husband. Alone. Pumping milk for my 5 month old son. Happy to talk to Amy’s sources. Unless it’s the old medela milk bag. That would be weird…!

Even more disturbing, the book alleges that aides to Hillary Clinton called the money being donated to the Clinton Foundation Chelsea’s “nest egg.” That seems to support allegations that the foundation spent funds meant for charitable efforts on personal expenses. Accusations that Chelsea’s wedding was paid for by foundation funds have circulated for years, and even earned a denial from Bill Clinton earlier this year.

No Clinton Foundation funds—dedicated to Haiti or otherwise—were used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding. It’s not only untrue, it’s a personal insult to me, to Hillary, and to Chelsea and Marc.

The fight between Chelsea and Chozick intensified, as Clinton insisted that the allegations were untrue because Chozick never fact-checked with her.

Hi Amy! The first sentence in the excerpt below is false – everything I’ve heard thus far that you write about me didn’t happen. We clearly have different definitions of nonfiction. Looking forward to your (belated) fact checking as relates to me. Thanks!

Things got even more catty after MSNBC’s Katy Tur, an outspoken critic of the Trump administration, came to Chozick’s defense. Clinton seemed to dismiss Chozick’s statement that she had her book reviewed by a professional fact checker, leading Tur to defend Chozick.

Allegations from the book, which also detailed how the Clinton sold access to their presence for big bucks.

Hillary Clinton’s aides called money donated to her charitable organization her daughter’s ‘nest egg’, a new book claims.

The former Democratic presidential candidate’s fundraiser took in $250 million for the Clinton Foundation before she announced her White House run.

In her new book, Chasing Hillary: Ten Years, Two Presidential Campaigns and One Intact Glass Ceiling, New York Times journalist Amy Chozick does not say if the nest egg comment from one aide was a joke, though it appears to be a snarky comment referring to the foundation’s history of controversy.

The revelation is likely to deepen a feud between Chelsea Clinton and Chozick.

The former first daughter has been using her Twitter account to berate Chozick and accuse her of writing ‘fiction’.

In a series of tweets Chelsea first attacked specific parts of the book – that she popped open Veuve Cliquot champagne an hour after polls closed on election night, and that she had keratin treatment to straighten her hair – then stepped up the assault claming the book should not be in the non-fiction section.

Chelsea alleges the book was not fact-checked and attacked MSNBC anchor Katy Tur when she supported Chozick.

The man fact checking amychozick’s book is the same one who fact checked mine. The same one who is so nit picky that he called Delta to confirm flight times. I would bet on Chozick here, not ChelseaClinton.

The ‘nest egg’ description will renew scrutiny of the foundation, which is currently being investigated by the FBI over a possible pay-to-play scheme while Clinton was Secretary of State.

The FBI first looked into the organization in 2016 but the investigation did not lead to any charges. Reports in January said that it was reopened and is still ongoing.

It has long faced questions over its relationship to all three Clintons’ wider activities.

One explosive email revealed in the Wikileaks publication of Hillary’s campaign chief John Podesta said that it had paid for her wedding.

The email, from Doug Band, Bill’s closest aide for many years said: ‘The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents.’

No Clintons passed any personal comment on it for more than a year – although spokespeople denied it – until January when Bill used twitter to deny that funds raised to help Haiti after an earthquake there had been raided to pay for Chelsea’s lavish wedding to Marc Mezvinsky, with whom she now has two children.

The charity, whose full name is the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, has Bill and Chelsea on its board and says that neither are paid a salary or expenses.

But critics have focused on how it is part of a political machine.

Besides the “nest egg” controversy, the book details the disturbing way the Clintons monetized access to themselves.

Exposing international corruptions and how big corporations de-stabilise sovereign nations and ultimately take control of their resources and wealth

Often times, intel comes to us in various forms, requiring us to parse it, vet it, sort it, collate it, confirm it and then compose a release/report for public consumption. In this instance, the intel will be released as is for it needs no process as described above. Some of these facts were already known, [...]

by Jon Rappoport November 19, 2015 (To join our email list, click here.) These conventional science bloggers are really something. They’ve never met a published study extolling mainstream science they haven’t loved. I don’t know, maybe the studies somehow remind them of mommy and her warm basement where they still live at age 40 and […]

(Natural News) When the NY Times, Washington Post, CNN and other fact-challenged news outlets reported a few months ago that the oceans were warming at a catastrophic rate due to climate change, they all missed a glaring math error in the original science paper. The paper, co-authored by Ralph Keeling of the Scripps Institution of... Read More […]

The CEO of L Brands’ Victoria’s Secret division, Jan Singer, resigned last Wednesday amid a continued slowdown in sales and a lack of diversity at the line's iconic annual fashion show. The departure comes about a week after the brand's marketing director Ed Razek, triggered outrage for saying in a Vogue interview that Victoria's Secret decide […]

Mass-murdering war criminal and Satan-worshiping Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to reach a plea deal to save his own life by squealing on his Rothschild masters, Mossad sources say. The impending fall of Netanyahu means the final collapse of the Khazarian mafia is now in sight and it will not be long before […] The post Archcriminal Net […]

British Government Hangs by a Thread as Tories Split into Warring Camps; Clamor for Second Referendum and Brexit Rollback Grows; Democratic Gains in U.S. House Now 37 Seats and Counting; Loser Trump Retreats into Cocoon of Bluster and Self-Pity; Facebook Reportedly Knew of Russian Attack on 2016 Election but Refused Countermeasures; Main Focus Was Discrediti […]

Updated 151118:Utterly desperate Wang Tack accuses authorities who certified Lynas as safe over the weekend of accepting funds from the company.The Mole has the story and video clip h e r e.Original article:Can't blame people for taking potshots at Wong Tack and calling him "drama king" and a "bogus champion of the green" (read What […]

I have written on this previously, and my views remain the same, so I am just going to reproduce excerpts here of what I wrote before. I want to share my thoughts on why I think the death penalty is wrong, but allow me to first digress for a moment. Irene is in her 70’s. […]