WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites), hearing arguments in an unusual segregation case, challenged California state lawyers Tuesday over a prison policy that separates inmates by race for their first 60 days behind bars.

The case puts in conflict two principles of law. One is that the government may not practice racial segregation. The other is that judges should defer to prison wardens on how to manage their inmates.

Last year, state prison officials said, they processed 110,000 new inmates at seven "reception centers." Because California has a history of violent, race-based gangs — inside and outside the prisons — the officials said they housed new inmates with people of the same race as a precaution.

When you go to the zoo,they have all the same animals in the same cages,right?They dont put the bears in with the lions right?Why,Because it's the natural thing to do,so they don't fight like they'd do in the wild!
This is just another example of the goverment jew spending white tax money making itself look like there doing the "right thing" crusaiding for the always represed,constantly wronged,but still proud black community.It's so politicaly corrrect its disgusting.ask yourself why the black community always revolves ,& is mentioned the most, around prisons & Low class "getto" communitys,usually near the unemployment & welfare offices.Dont let zog fool you,he wants to put us right there next to the blacks & the mexicans.
DON'T LET THEM WIN,FIGHT ZOG!!!!!WHITE PRIDE,WORLD WIDE!

U.S. Supreme Court to decide if segregation by race is allowed to combat gang power.

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider a case of racial segregation to decide whether California can place new inmates in cells divided by race.

An inmate sued over California's routine practice of dividing inmates by race during their first 60 days of incarceration. Nathan Barankin, a spokesman for the state attorney general, said it is a simple, yet effective way to keep from unwittingly placing members of competing gangs in the same cell, while prison staff members do in-depth assessment.

SPR seeks to end sexual violence committed against men, women, and youth in all forms of detention.

"The horrors experienced by many young inmates, particularly those who are convicted of nonviolent offenses, border on the unimaginable. Prison rape not only threatens the lives of those who fall prey to their aggressors, but it is potentially devastating to the human spirit. Shame, depression, and a shattering loss of self-esteem accompany the perpetual terror the victim thereafter must endure."

In California, it is actually black inmates, rather than whites or others, who are the most in danger of being attacked on account of their race. Multi-racialist ideology often hurts those it claims to fight for.

If you’re an Arab terrorist, the New York Times is willing to lie about the Geneva Conventions, in order to aid and abet you. But if you’re a white American prisoner, as far as Times publisher Arthur “Pinch” Sulzberger Jr. and his lackeys are concerned, no punishment is too grisly to be meted out to you.

Last Sunday’s Times ran a house editorial, ”Racial Segregation in Prison”, opposing a California prison policy that for many white prisoners, has been the difference between life and death.

California prison officials have in recent years been guilty of showing mercy to white prisoners, and the Times will not stand for that. The California Department of Corrections racially segregates new prisoners with members of their own race for 60 days after their arrival in an institution. The reason for the practice is simple enough, but in matters of race, the Times can always be counted on to hide from or lie about the facts. Targeting white inmates for rape based on the color of their skin has long been a sport among the black (and to a lesser degree, Hispanic) prisoners who dominate so many prisons in this country, and who consider such racial attacks their birthright. And since such rapes are often committed by violent offenders who know they are HIV+, and result in the death of the victim through AIDS, they are thus a package deal of assault, rape, and murder, not to mention the sexual slavery that the rape initiates. Note that the slavery that is pervasive in the nation’s prisons is just one more thing the Times doesn’t want you to know about. And so, the same newspaper that opposes the death penalty for blacks and Hispanics is not at all concerned, if every prison sentence for a white man, no matter how brief and how petty the offense, may become in practice, a death sentence. I believe the Constitution calls that, “cruel and unusual punishment.”

What if “Pinch” Sulzberger Jr. and his lackeys got a taste of their own medicine? I'd like to see how well they'd fair being thrown into an unsegrated prison for a couple of months. I don't think all their whining and anti-racist brotherly love would do much to stop some minority perverts from having sex with them.

__________________

An army of principles can penetrate where an army of soldiers cannot. - Thomas Paine

The issue of prison rape is one that should be of paramount interest to all WP/WN since it is not at all unlikely that many of us who dare to stand up for our kith and kin will face imprisonment sooner or later, no matter how nonviolent we may be, e.g., Zundel.

One possible avenue to better assure our safety is to bring lawsuits against prison authorities who needlessly subject Whites to rape by NOT segregating them from dangerous perverted nonwhites, who have a literal hard-on for any vulnerable White.