The white adipose organ is composed of both subcutaneous and several intra-abdominal depots. Excess abdominal adiposity is a major risk factor for metabolic disease in rodents and humans, while expansion of subcutaneous fat does not carry the same risks. Brown adipose produces heat as a defense against hypothermia and obesity, and the appearance of brown-like adipocytes within white adipose tissue depots is associated with improved metabolic phenotypes. Thus, understanding the differences in cell biology and function of these different adipose cell types and depots may be critical to the development of new therapies for metabolic disease. Here, we found that Prdm16, a brown adipose determination factor, is selectively expressed in subcutaneous white adipocytes relative to other white fat depots in mice. Transgenic expression of Prdm16 in fat tissue robustly induced the development of brown-like adipocytes in subcutaneous, but not epididymal, adipose depots. Prdm16 transgenic mice displayed increased energy expenditure, limited weight gain, and improved glucose tolerance in response to a high-fat diet. shRNA-mediated depletion of Prdm16 in isolated subcutaneous adipocytes caused a sharp decrease in the expression of thermogenic genes and a reduction in uncoupled cellular respiration. Finally, Prdm16 haploinsufficiency reduced the brown fat phenotype in white adipose tissue stimulated by β-adrenergic agonists. These results demonstrate that Prdm16 is a cell-autonomous determinant of a brown fat–like gene program and thermogenesis in subcutaneous adipose tissues.

The rise in the incidence of obesity has driven a public health crisis because excess adiposity predisposes to cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, stroke, and many cancers (1, 2). Since weight gain is almost always caused by chronic energy imbalance, nonsurgical therapy for obesity must reduce energy intake and/or increase energy expenditure.

There are 2 major types of adipose tissues in mammals, white and brown. White adipose tissue (WAT) is highly adapted to store excess energy in the form of triglycerides. Conversely, brown adipose tissue (BAT) oxidizes chemical energy to produce heat as a defense against hypothermia and obesity. WAT develops in distinct intra-abdominal depots and in the subcutaneous layer (between the fascia and muscle). The accumulation of intra-abdominal, visceral WAT, rather than total adiposity, is most strongly correlated with elevated risk for metabolic dysfunction and cardiovascular disease (3–8). By contrast, expansion of subcutaneous WAT, even in the setting of obesity, has been suggested to promote insulin sensitivity in rodents and humans (9–14). Implantation of subcutaneous WAT, but not visceral WAT, into the abdominal cavity of mice improves whole-body metabolism (15, 16). Moreover, subcutaneous and visceral WAT express unique gene signatures (17). These data suggest that some of the distinct metabolic effects of subcutaneous and visceral WAT are cell autonomous. However, the molecular mechanisms governing the fat cell–intrinsic differences of these depots have not yet been established.

Brown fat–like adipocytes, having a multilocular morphology and expressing the brown adipocyte–specific uncoupling protein-1 (Ucp1) protein, are found interspersed in the WAT of rodents and humans. These have been called adaptive or recruitable brown fat cells, brown in white (brite) cells, or beige cells (18–20). The development of these brown fat–like cells in WAT is dramatically enhanced during adaptation to cold or in response to treatment with β3-selective adrenergic agonists (21–26). The brown-like transformation of WAT is most prominent in the inguinal subcutaneous depot, whereas the perigonadal adipose is less susceptible to browning (21, 23, 27–30).

Recent studies have shown that Myf5-expressing embryonic progenitors give rise to the classic depots of brown adipose (31), but the brown-like cells induced by β3-agonists in WAT do not appear to arise from this cell lineage. Various factors have been implicated in the activation of brown-like adipocyte development in WAT. Pharmacological activation of PPARγ by the antidiabetic thiazolidinedione drugs causes a “browning” of white adipose cells and tissue (19, 32–37). Moreover, transgenic expression of Foxc2 or increased prostaglandin levels sensitizes WAT to the effects of catecholamines and thereby promotes brown adipocyte development (38–40). Finally, a large number of knockout mouse strains that resist diet-induced obesity are characterized by a brown-like transformation of WAT (41–52). However, the transcriptional cascades that control the endogenous transformation of white to brown adipose tissues have not been determined.

Prdm16 is a transcriptional coregulator that controls the development of brown adipocytes in classic BAT depots (31, 53–56). Because the brown adipocytes in BAT and WAT belong to separate lineages, a role for Prdm16 in the adaptive induction of brown adipose within WAT has not been addressed. Furthermore, a detailed examination of Prdm16 expression in different depots of WAT is lacking. We previously reported that Prdm16 was expressed in BAT but not in WAT; however, we had only examined epididymal WAT (epidWAT) depots. In the present study, we showed that Prdm16 is highly expressed in subcutaneous WAT relative to its levels in epidWAT and retroperitoneal WAT. Transgenic expression of Prdm16 in all adipose tissues caused a selective transformation of subcutaneous WAT to a brown-like phenotype. The development of brown-like cells in the subcutaneous adipose of aP2-Prdm16 animals was associated with a rise in whole-body energy expenditure and a suppression of weight gain in response to a high-fat diet. Importantly, Prdm16 was required for the induction of a thermogenic gene program in isolated, WT subcutaneous adipocytes and in vivo. Thus, our results identify Prdm16 as a critical mediator of adaptive thermogenesis in subcutaneous WAT.

Prdm16 is highly expressed in subcutaneous white adipocytes. We originally identified Prdm16 as a transcriptional regulator that is selectively expressed in interscapular BAT (iBAT) versus epidWAT of mice (53). Here we performed a more detailed analysis of Prdm16 expression levels in different depots of WAT from mice housed at a standard temperature (24°C). Importantly, Prdm16 mRNA was enriched by approximately 5-fold in 2 different subcutaneous WAT depots, inguinal WAT (ingWAT) and anterior subcutaneous WAT, relative to its levels in epidWAT and retroperitoneal WAT, 2 prominent intra-abdominal WAT depots in male mice (Figure 1A). The Prdm16 mRNA level in subcutaneous WAT was approximately half that in iBAT. Moreover, Western blot analysis showed that Prdm16 protein was present in ingWAT at about half its level in iBAT, and was not detectable in epidWAT (Figure 1B). Other brown adipocyte–selective (and Prdm16 target) genes, including Ucp1, Cidea, Cox8b, and Elovl3 (Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:
10.1172/JCI44271DS1), were also substantially enriched in subcutaneous WAT compared with their levels in epidWAT and retroperitoneal WAT. Conversely, Retn, a gene known to be preferentially expressed in white versus brown adipose cells in mice (37, 53, 57), was expressed at reduced levels in subcutaneous WAT compared with epidWAT and retroperitoneal WAT (Supplemental Figure 1A).

WAT is composed of mature adipocytes as well as other cells in what is termed the stromal-vascular (SV) fraction; the SV fraction contains preadipose cells, fibroblasts, immune cells, and blood vessel–associated cells. To determine which cell populations in subcutaneous WAT expresses Prdm16, we measured Prdm16 mRNA levels in fractionated adipose tissues. Prdm16 mRNA was significantly enriched in the mature adipocyte component of ingWAT relative to its levels in the SV fraction. In fact, Prdm16 mRNA levels in subcutaneous adipocytes were similar to that found in mature brown fat cells from iBAT. As expected, Glut4 and Ucp1, genes known to be selectively expressed in mature adipocytes, were coenriched with Prdm16 in the adipocyte fraction relative to the SV fraction (Figure 1D). The relatively high levels of Ucp1 mRNA in the SV component of iBAT was due to the presence of a substantial number of brown adipocytes that do not contain enough lipids to float during the cell fractionation process. Prdm16, Ucp1, and other brown-selective markers were also induced during the in vitro differentiation of preadipocytes isolated from the SV fraction of ingWAT (Figure 1E and Supplemental Figure 1B), which indicates that a brown fat–like gene program is a cell-autonomous feature of subcutaneous adipocytes. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Prdm16 is expressed at very significant levels in mature subcutaneous adipocytes.

Transgenic expression of Prdm16 stimulates brown adipocyte development preferentially in subcutaneous WAT. We previously showed that transgenic expression of Prdm16 in all adipose depots (using the –5 kb aP2 promoter/enhancer; also referred to as Fabp4) caused no morphological or molecular changes in the iBAT or WAT of mice under basal conditions (53). However, we only examined visceral epidWAT in these studies. The depot-selective expression of Prdm16 in subcutaneous WAT (Figure 1) strongly suggested reexamining these mice, especially with regard to the subcutaneous WAT depots. As shown in Figure 2A, 10- to 14-week-old male aP2-Prdm16 transgenic mice fed a regular chow diet and housed at 24°C expressed similar amounts of Prdm16 mRNA in epidWAT, ingWAT, and iBAT. Strikingly, Prdm16 protein was elevated to a much greater extent in the ingWAT and iBAT compared with the epidWAT of these mice (Figure 2B). Ectopic expression of Prdm16 robustly increased the levels of several brown fat–selective genes, such as Ucp1, Cidea, and Ppargc1a, by approximately 5- to 10-fold in ingWAT, but not epidWAT (Figure 2C). In female transgenic mice, Prdm16 increased the levels of brown fat–selective genes in ingWAT, but not in periovarian (gonadal) WAT (Supplemental Figure 2). Importantly, the expression levels of these genes in the male or female iBAT, which was already quite high in WT animals, were not increased in aP2-Prdm16 mice. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Prdm16 did not increase the levels of adipocyte selective genes common to white and brown adipocytes, such as AdipoQ, Fabp4, or Glut4, in any male or female depot examined (Figure 2C and Supplemental Figure 2). Therefore, Prdm16 preferentially induces a brown fat–like gene program in subcutaneous WAT.

Transgenic expression of Prdm16 induces a thermogenic gene program in subcutaneous WAT. (A–C) The aP2 promoter/enhancer was used to drive ectopic Prdm16 expression in all adipose depots. (A) Real-time PCR analysis of Prdm16 mRNA levels in the epidWAT, ingWAT, and iBAT of 10- to 14-week-old male WT and aP2-Prdm16 mice fed a regular chow diet. (B) Western blot analysis of Prdm16 protein levels in adipose depots from mice in A. Pol-II was used as a loading control. (C) mRNA levels of brown fat–selective genes (Ucp1, Cidea, and Ppargc1a) and general adipocyte markers (AdipoQ, Fabp4, and Glut4) in the indicated adipose depots from WT and aP2-Prdm16 mice. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 8 mice per group). **P < 0.01 vs. WT.

The activation of brown adipose–selective genes in the subcutaneous WAT of aP2-Prdm16 animals was accompanied by a profound morphological transformation toward a BAT-like phenotype. Specifically, the ingWAT of aP2-Prdm16, but not WT littermates, contained numerous clusters of Ucp1-expressing, multilocular adipocytes under basal conditions (Figure 3, A–D). However, Ucp1-expressing adipocytes were not detected in the epidWAT from transgenic or WT mice (Figure 3, E–G). Furthermore, we did not observe any discernible morphological changes in the iBAT between transgenic and WT mice (Supplemental Figure 3). Interestingly, aP2-Prdm16 mice ingWAT contained 5 times more tyrosine hydroxylase–positive (TH+), sympathetic parenchymal nerve fibers than that of WT littermates. The increase in sympathetic nerve fibers was depot selective, since we did not observe any change in the number of TH+ parenchymal fibers between the epidWAT of transgenic and WT animals. Together, these results indicate that Prdm16 can drive a full program of brown adipocyte–like development, obvious at both morphological and molecular levels, in subcutaneous WAT under basal conditions.

Prdm16 stimulates the development of brown-like adipocytes in subcutaneous WAT. (A–G) Immunohistochemistry for Ucp1 protein (brown stain) in sections of ingWAT (A–D) and epidWAT (E–G) from 10- to 14-week-old male WT (A and E) and aP2-Prdm16 (B–D, F, and G) mice. (D) High-magnification and representative image of ingWAT from a transgenic animal. Arrowheads depict Ucp1 immunopositive cells that have a unilocular morphology typical of white adipocytes. (H and I) Immunohistochemistry for TH protein in samples of ingWAT from WT (H) and aP2-Prdm16 (I) animals as described above. Original magnification, ×20 (A–C and E–G); ×100 (D, H, and I). (J) Quantification of TH-expressing nerve fibers in WT and transgenic ingWAT. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 20 fields per sample in each of 3 animals per group). **P < 0.01 vs. WT.

Protection against high-fat diet–induced weight gain in aP2-Prdm16 mice. In light of the striking effect of Prdm16 action in subcutaneous WAT depots, the transgenic animals were subjected to metabolic analyses in response to both regular chow and high-fat diet. On regular chow, aP2-Prdm16 mice and their WT littermates did not display any notable difference in daily energy balance, but aP2-Prdm16 mice had a slightly increased lean mass (Supplemental Figure 4). During high-fat feeding, aP2-Prdm16 mice gained significantly less weight than their age- and sex-matched WT littermates (Figure 4A). Body composition analyses after 16 weeks of high-fat diet showed that transgenic animals had gained substantially less fat, resulting in a higher lean/fat mass ratio compared with WT animals (Figure 4B). The suppressed weight gain in the aP2-Prdm16 animals was not associated with decreased food intake (Figure 4C). However, we observed higher energy expenditure during both day and night cycles in these mice (Figure 4C). Importantly, energy expenditure was assessed after short-term high-fat feeding (7 days), before the occurrence of changes in body weight or composition that could potentially confound these calculations (58, 59). Physical activity was also comparable between aP2-Prdm16 and WT animals (Supplemental Figure 5). Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the aP2-Prdm16 mice were protected from obesity on a high-fat diet because of a significant increase in energy expenditure not linked to physical activity.

aP2-Prdm16 mice are protected from obesity and metabolic dysfunction upon high-fat feeding.
(A) Body weights of WT and aP2-Prdm16 mice during 10-week time course of high-fat feeding. (B) MRI was used to analyze body composition (fat and lean mass) in WT and aP2-Prdm16 mice after 16 weeks of high-fat diet. (C) Energy expenditure and food intake was measured for 72 hours in individually housed WT and aP2-Prdm16 mice after 1 week of high-fat diet. Energy expenditure is reported as VO2/mouse/hour. (D) Glucose tolerance test. Blood glucose levels were measured in 16-week high-fat diet–fed WT or aP2-Prdm16 mice after an overnight fast (time 0) and at the indicated times after intraperitoneal injection of glucose. (E) Insulin tolerance test. Blood glucose levels were measured after an overnight fast (time 0) and at the indicated times after an intraperitoneal injection of insulin in mice from D. (F) Immunohistochemistry for Ucp1 (brown stain) protein in ingWAT from WT and aP2-Prdm16 mice after 16 weeks of high-fat diet. The boxed region is shown at higher magnification at right. Ucp1-expressing multilocular and unilocular fat cells are indicated by the arrow and arrowhead, respectively. Original magnification, ×20 (left and middle); ×100 (right). mRNA levels of brown fat–selective genes (Ucp1 and Cidea) were determined in epidWAT, ingWAT, and iBAT from WT and aP2-Prdm16 animals after 16 weeks of high-fat diet. Significance between curves was determined by 2-way ANOVA. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 16 mice per group per experiment). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. WT.

Diet-induced obesity is frequently associated with glucose intolerance and progressive metabolic dysfunction. Notably, aP2-Prdm16 animals displayed a marked increase in glucose tolerance relative to WT animals, assayed after 16 weeks of high-fat feeding (Figure 4D). High-fat–fed aP2-Prdm16 mice were also more insulin sensitive, as determined by insulin tolerance tests (Figure 4E). As was observed in chow-fed animals, Ucp1-expressing fat cells (both multilocular and unilocular) were readily detected in the ingWAT of aP2-Prdm16 mice, but not in WT mice, after 16 weeks of consuming a high-fat diet (Figure 4F). The WAT of high-fat–fed aP2-Prdm16 animals also expressed higher levels of brown fat–selective genes relative to WT mice (Figure 4F). Interestingly, high-fat diet promoted a significant induction in the levels of thermogenic genes in epidWAT of aP2-Prdm16 animals (Figure 4F); this effect was not seen in chow-fed cohorts. Importantly, the levels of these thermogenic genes were not altered by the aP2-Prdm16 transgene in the iBAT, even after 16 weeks of high-fat diet. These results suggest that the elevated energy dissipation in aP2-Prdm16 animals is not due to superactivation of the endogenous classical BAT. Rather, it is more likely to have occurred via the thermogenic program expressed in the remodeled brown-like subcutaneous adipose. Together, these observations demonstrate that increased Prdm16 action in adipose tissue raises energy expenditure to counteract weight gain and drive glucose disposal. These actions appear to occur mainly in the subcutaneous WAT.

Prdm16 is a cell-autonomous regulator of thermogenesis in subcutaneous adipocytes. The transgenic experiments above showed that elevated Prdm16 expression in WAT can drive a program of adaptive thermogenesis in vivo. However, a key question is whether isolated subcutaneous adipocytes require Prdm16 for thermogenic gene expression and respiratory function. To answer this question, we knocked down expression of Prdm16 in primary cultured adipocytes from subcutaneous WAT of WT mice using a shRNA expressed from an adenovirus. Adenoviral vectors expressing a control scrambled sequence or Prdm16 shRNA (sh-Prdm16) were used to infect subconfluent SV cells from ingWAT, which contain a high proportion of adipocyte precursors. These SV cultures were induced to undergo adipogenesis 2 days after adenovirus transduction. As shown in Figure 5A, endogenous Prdm16 mRNA levels were very efficiently decreased by the sh-Prdm16–expressing vector in adipocytes. Moreover, the adenoviral vectors (which also expressed GFP) were taken up and expressed by greater than 90% of adipocytes derived from primary inguinal preadipose cells (Figure 5B). Knockdown of Prdm16 did not interfere with adipogenesis per se, since control and Prdm16-depleted cells underwent a similar extent of morphological differentiation, as shown by Oil-Red-O staining for lipid accumulation (Figure 5C). Control and Prdm16-depleted adipocyte cultures also expressed equivalent levels of general adipocyte-related mRNAs like Fabp4 and AdipoQ (Figure 5C). However, suppression of Prdm16 expression completely blocked the differentiation-linked expression of most brown fat–selective genes, including Ucp1, Cidea, and Cox8b (Figure 5D). This decrease in Prdm16 levels also blunted the activation of thermogenic genes Ucp1 and Ppargc1a in response to the synthetic catecholamine isoproterenol. Western blot analysis indicated that Ucp1 protein expression was almost completely ablated by loss of Prdm16 in both untreated and isoproterenol-stimulated adipocytes (Figure 5E). To determine whether Prdm16 is required for the expression of brown fat–selective genes in mature fat cells or whether it functions during the process of differentiation, we knocked down Prdm16 in adipocytes 7 days after induction of differentiation. Loss of Prdm16 from fully differentiated adipocytes caused a dramatic reduction in the expression of brown fat–related genes like Ucp1, Cidea, Ppargc1a, and Cox8b without affecting the levels of general fat markers Fabp4 and AdipoQ (Supplemental Figure 6). These results indicate that Prdm16 is required in mature subcutaneous fat cells for the full activation of a brown fat–like gene program.

Prdm16 is required for expression of a thermogenic gene program in subcutaneous adipocytes. (A–G) Subcutaneous preadipocytes in the SV fraction of inguinal fat from WT mice were transduced with adenovirus expressing a shRNA targeted to Prdm16 or a scrambled control shRNA (ctl). These cultures were then induced to differentiate in vitro into adipocytes. (A) Prdm16 mRNA levels (with and without isoproterenol stimulation, as indicated). (B) GFP was expressed from adenoviral shRNA vectors, and its expression was used to reveal control shRNA– and sh-Prdm16–transduced adipocytes. (C) Oil-Red-O staining (red) for lipid accumulation. mRNA levels of general adipocyte markers (Fabp4 and AdipoQ) were also determined. (D) mRNA levels of brown fat–selective genes (Ucp1, Cidea, Cox8b, and Ppargc1a). (E) Western blot analysis for Prdm16 and Ucp1 protein. (F) Oxygen consumption, assayed using a Clark-type electrode. Oligomycin (ATPase inhibitor) and CCCP (chemical uncoupler) were added to cells to measure the rates of uncoupled and maximal respiration, respectively. (G and H) WT Prdm16+/+ and heterozygous Prdm16+/– littermates were treated with CL316,243 for 3 days. (G) H&E staining of inguinal adipose tissue. (H) mRNA levels of Prdm16, brown fat–selective genes Ucp1 and Cidea, and Retn in epidWAT, ingWAT, and iBAT. Original magnification, ×20 (B, C, and G). Values are mean ± SD (n = 3–5). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Next, to examine whether Prdm16 is required for the respiratory activity of the isolated primary subcutaneous adipocytes, we measured oxygen consumption in control and Prdm16-depleted cells using a Clark electrode. sh-Prdm16–expressing subcutaneous adipocyte cultures had a significantly lower rate of uncoupled (state IV) respiration under unstimulated conditions. Upon treatment with isoproterenol, control cultures underwent a dramatic increase in uncoupled respiration, whereas adipocytes with reduced Prdm16 had a severely blunted response. Moreover, Prdm16-depleted cells exhibited lower maximal respiration than control cells after treatment with the uncoupler CCCP (Figure 5F). These results demonstrate that Prdm16 stimulates uncoupled respiration in a β-agonist–dependent manner in subcutaneous adipocytes.

Finally, we tested the in vivo requirement for Prdm16 expression in the β-adrenergic–induced activation of a brown fat gene program in WAT. Prdm16-deficient mice have a cleft palate and die perinatally, thus precluding analysis of Prdm16-deficient WAT (60). We have therefore studied the phenotype of WAT from 3-month-old male WT and Prdm16+/– heterozygous littermates after 3 days of treatment with the β3-selective adrenergic agonist CL316,243. As shown in Figure 5G, there were many fewer clusters of multilocular brown fat–like areas in the ingWAT of Prdm16+/– compared with WT mice. At the molecular level, approximately 50% reduction in Prdm16 mRNA levels causes a significant and specific reduction in the expression of brown fat–selective genes like Ucp1 and Cidea in WAT, especially in the ingWAT depot (Figure 5H). There was a near 8-fold decrease in Ucp1 levels in subcutaneous ingWAT from Prdm16+/– compared with WT animals. Conversely, Retn, a white fat–enriched gene, tended to be increased in the ingWAT of Prdm16+/– relative to WT mice. Interestingly, the expression of BAT-selective genes in the inguinal depot was much more sensitive to Prdm16 dosage compared with iBAT, at least under β3-agonist–stimulated conditions. These results reveal a genetic requirement for Prdm16 in the β3-adrenergic–stimulated induction of a brown fat phenotype within WAT.

Prdm16 is a key transcriptional regulator of the cellular lineage that gives rise to the classic brown adipose depots in mice. We report here that Prdm16 was expressed at substantial levels in subcutaneous WAT, where it regulated a functional thermogenic gene program. Thus, the Prdm16 pathway is a conserved mechanism that controls brown adipocyte development and thermogenic gene expression in 2 separate cell lineages.

The cellular precursor cell types for brown fat–like adipocytes in WAT are unknown. Notably, Prdm16 was highly expressed by mature adipocytes in subcutaneous WAT. Moreover, Prdm16 drove brown fat–like cell development in WAT when ectopically expressed in adipocytes from a differentiation-selective promoter. Finally, Prdm16 was cell-autonomously required in mature fat cells for induction of a brown fat–selective gene program. Together, these results suggest that mature adipocytes can be stimulated to express a brown fat–like phenotype, at least in ingWAT. Specific markers for white adipocytes are needed to answer whether brown fat–like cells can arise by transdifferentiation. This does not exclude the existence of alternative or additional progenitor cell types for the brown fat–like cells in WAT, including fibroblasts or preadipocytes, as has been proposed previously by us and many others. Additional marker genes and fate-mapping experiments are needed to resolve this issue.

Transgenic expression of Prdm16 in fat tissues stimulated the development of Ucp1-expressing, brown-like fat cells in ingWAT, but not epidWAT. Notably, there was a significant increase in the levels of thermogenic genes in the absence of morphological brown-like adipose development in the epidWAT of transgenic mice, although the absolute level of thermogenic gene expression was far lower in the epididymal than in the inguinal depot. Moreover, haploinsufficiency of Prdm16 caused a pronounced reduction in the expression of brown fat–specific genes in WAT, particularly in the subcutaneous depot, after β3-adrenergic stimulation. Thus, the extent of thermogenic gene induction in WAT is correlated with Prdm16 levels. The higher density of sympathetic nerve endings in the inguinal relative to the epididymal depot (61) presumably amplifies the browning effects of ectopic Prdm16 expression. Consistent with this, brown adipocytes can be induced in the epididymal depots of transgenic animals in response to a strong pharmacological β3-adrenergic stimulus (53). Although ectopic Prdm16 mRNA was equally increased in ingWAT and epidWAT of transgenic mice, the protein preferentially accumulated in the ingWAT depot. It is likely that epidWAT expresses a factor that degrades Prdm16, or affects its translation, to limit conversion of this tissue into brown-like fat. Based on its relatively large mass and increased expression of a brown fat–like gene program, it is likely that subcutaneous depots account for a substantial portion of the thermogenic output from WAT. However, we do not exclude a role for visceral depots in the thermogenic response to cold or high-fat diet, especially the depots that have propensity to develop brown-like adipocytes, like the mesenteric WAT (30). The relative contribution of WAT to total Ucp1-mediated energy dissipation, much of which likely occurs in classic BAT depots, remains to be determined.

Prdm16 induces the formation of brown fat–like cells in WAT under basal conditions, but the thermogenic function of the transgenic WAT was only revealed when another stimulus was given — in this case, a high-fat diet. The ability of overfeeding to elicit sympathetic outflow to brown fat and heart is well known (62–65). Therefore, we speculate that Prdm16 acts as a determining factor in subcutaneous adipocytes to establish a gene program under basal conditions that can allow for activation of thermogenesis in response to cold or overfeeding. Although these stimuli did not increase Prdm16 levels, further studies are needed to assess whether catecholamines can directly or indirectly enhance Prdm16 activity. Importantly, a program of adaptive thermogenesis in WAT of Prdm16 transgenic animals suppressed obesity caused by a high-fat diet. These mice also displayed a dramatic enhancement in the clearance of blood glucose relative to WT mice after intraperitoneal glucose infusion. This effect reflects enhanced insulin action, much of which is likely secondary to the reduced obesity and fat mass in transgenic mice, but it may also involve non–insulin-dependent glucose disposal into the transgenic WAT. Additional metabolic analyses of these mice are needed to answer this question.

In classic brown fat depots, thermogenesis is tightly regulated by catecholamines secreted by sympathetic nerve endings in BAT. Moreover, the density of brown-like adipocytes in WAT depots is positively correlated with the number of sympathetic nerve fibers (61). The clusters of brown fat–like cells that appear in Prdm16 transgenic WAT may develop at and/or near sympathetic nerve terminals. If so, it may be that all transgenic adipocytes are competent to induce a brown fat program, but require an additional sympathetic stimulus. Alternatively, distinct subtypes of subcutaneous adipocytes exist, with different propensities to acquire brown fat–like features in response to Prdm16 expression. Notably, we observed a dramatic increase in the number of sympathetic parenchymal nerve fibers infiltrating the ingWAT of aP2-Prdm16 transgenic mice compared with WT animals (Figure 3). How Prdm16 acts to stimulate the recruitment of sympathetic nerves to WAT is unknown, but of considerable interest. The increase in Prdm16 expression in epidWAT of transgenic mice may have been insufficient to stimulate nerve recruitment. Alternatively, other factors unique to subcutaneous depots may act in parallel with Prdm16 to fully stimulate brown fat cell development. Whatever the mechanism, the enrichment of sympathetic nerves in the vicinity of brown fat–like cells in WAT ensures that the tissue can efficiently undergo thermogenesis in response to the activity of the sympathetic nervous system. The sympathetic nervous system undoubtedly provides a major control mechanism for the thermogenesis of subcutaneous WAT in vivo. However, cultured subcutaneous adipocytes from WT mice expressed a differentiation-linked brown fat–like gene program ex vivo; this gene profile was intrinsic to subcutaneous adipocytes and thus not obligatorily linked to the sympathetic nervous system. Importantly, Prdm16 was cell-autonomously required for the expression of this thermogenic gene program in subcutaneous adipocytes.

It will now be important to carefully examine whether subcutaneous human WAT not chronically stimulated by cold exposure also expresses Prdm16 at reasonable levels. Interestingly, biopsies of adult human BAT contain an admixture of unilocular and multilocular adipocytes that express enriched amounts of Prdm16 mRNA (66–69); the morphological appearance of this tissue is reminiscent of subcutaneous adipose (beige fat) from cold-exposed or β3 agonist–treated rodents. Therefore, a key question is whether human BAT is analogous to the classic BAT or adaptive BAT in rodents.

It is still debated whether the amount of activated BAT in humans is sufficient to impact energy balance in a meaningful way. On the other hand, subcutaneous WAT is very abundant in humans. A recent report suggests that thermogenic, Ucp1-expressing beige fat cells in human subcutaneous fat correlates with insulin sensitivity (70). If subcutaneous human WAT expresses Prdm16, this tissue could be a promising target for stimulating energy expenditure pathways to counteract obesity and insulin resistance.

Mice and dissections. All animal experiments were performed according to procedures approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute or of University of Pennsylvania. Mice were either maintained on a standard rodent chow or a 60% high-fat diet (Research Diets) with 12-hour light and dark cycles. The derivation and initial characterization of aP2-Prdm16 transgenic mice was described previously (53). However, for this study, we backcrossed the aP2-Prdm16 strain into the C57BL/6 genetic background for 8 generations to enable high-fat diet–induced obesity studies. Prdm16-deficient mice, which have been described previously (60), were provided by B.C. Bjork and D.R. Beier (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA). Unless noted specifically, male animals were used for experiments. In general, we adhered to the nomenclature for dissected depots described by Murano et al. (30). Specific definitions of dissected depots are as follows: epidWAT (or perigonadal depot in females), prominent bilateral intra-abdominal visceral depots in male mice attached to the epididymides; periovarian WAT (or perigonadal depot in males), bilateral intra-abdominal visceral depots attached to the ovaries; retroperitoneal WAT, bilateral depots in abdominal cavity behind the peritoneum on the dorsal side of the kidney; anterior subcutaneous, bilateral superficial subcutaneous WAT between the skin and muscle fascia posterior to the lower segment of the upper limbs; ingWAT, bilateral superficial subcutaneous WAT depots between the skin and muscle fascia just anterior to the lower segment of the hind limbs; iBAT, most prominent depot of classic brown adipocytes in rodents, found as bilobed tissue between the scapulae. CL316,243 (Sigma-Aldrich) at 1 mg/kg was injected intraperitoneally into mice. All metabolic and gene expression studies were performed in adult (8- to 16-week-old) male mice of the C57BL/6 genetic background (Taconic).

Real-time PCR analysis and Western blotting. Total RNA from cultured cells was isolated using the TRIzol method (Invitrogen) combined with Qiagen RNEasy mini columns according to manufacturer’s instruction. For real-time PCR analysis, RNA was reverse transcribed using the ABI high capacity cDNA synthesis kit and used in quantitative PCR reactions containing SYBR-green fluorescent dye (ABI). Relative expression of mRNAs was determined after normalization with TBP levels using the ΔΔCt method. Quantitative PCR was performed using the ABI-7600HT PCR machine. Primer sequences were reported previously (53). Student’s t test was used to compare expression levels and obtain statistics. Primers used for real-time PCR are shown in Supplemental Table 1. For Western blot analysis, cells or tissues were lysed in RIPA buffer (0.5% NP-40, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5). Lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore), and probed with anti-Ucp1 (Chemicon), anti-Prdm16 (rabbit polyclonal), and anti–pol-II (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Metabolic phenotyping. For glucose tolerance tests, animals were fasted overnight. The next morning, glucose levels in tail blood were measured with a standard glucometer prior to and at timed intervals following an intraperitoneal injection of 2 g/kg D-glucose. Body weight was measured on a weekly basis for high-fat feeding experiments. Fat and fat-free mass was measured by MRI. Whole-body energy metabolism was evaluated using a Comprehensive Lab Animal Monitoring System (CLAMS, Columbia Instruments). Mice were acclimated in the metabolic chambers for 2 days before the starting the experiment to minimize stress from the housing change. CO2 and O2 levels were collected every 32 minutes for each mouse over a period of 3 days. Movement and food intake are measured more frequently at regular intervals.

Histological analysis. Tissues were dissected and fixed in 4% para­formaldehyde overnight and rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline before embedding in paraffin. For Ucp1 immunohistochemistry, paraffin-embedded sections were incubated with anti-Ucp1 (Abcam), followed by detection using the ABC Vectastain-Elite kit (Vector Labs) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Immunohistochemistry for TH was performed using anti-TH antibodies (Millipore) as described previously (73). TH+ parenchymal nerve fibers (i.e., fibers closely associated to adipocytes in the depots) were counted; perivascular fibers (those in contact with arterioles and venules) were not considered in the quantitative analysis. 20 randomly selected areas, representative of the depot, were studied in the inguinal subcutaneous depot of each animal using a Nikon Eclipse E800 light microscope with a ×100 oil immersion objective at ×1,250 final magnification. The density of TH-immunoreactive fibers was calculated as the number of fibers per 100 adipocytes.

Statistics. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA, 2-tailed Student’s t test, or linear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism, as indicated. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

We are grateful to Bryan Bjork and David R. Beier for Prdm16-deficient mice. We thank Mary Selak and Nicolai Dolibai for assistance with oxygen consumption assays and Dina Laznik and Matthew Brown for technical assistance. This work was supported by NIH grant DK081605 and a Keystone Innovation Starter Kit (KISK) program grant to P. Seale; by NIH grant DK31405-24 to B.M. Spiegelman; and by the Institute for Diabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism (IDOM) at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.