As much as I like Edward Snowden, I hope he leaks a big enough, scandalous, bombshell on BO after the first of the year forcing his resignation…. America can not take much more of his putrefying corruption… nor should we have to…

]]>Comment on EX-NAVY SEAL DROPS BOMBSHELL: Says Government Is CREATING Conditions To Impose Martial Law ! by foxyladi14https://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/ex-navy-seal-drops-bombshell-says-government-is-creating-conditions-to-impose-martial-law/comment-page-2/#comment-29115
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 17:16:23 +0000http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/?p=6643#comment-29115A hoax just like Obama. But a lot of people have got richer because of it.:mad:
]]>Comment on EX-NAVY SEAL DROPS BOMBSHELL: Says Government Is CREATING Conditions To Impose Martial Law ! by Tellurianhttps://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/ex-navy-seal-drops-bombshell-says-government-is-creating-conditions-to-impose-martial-law/comment-page-2/#comment-29106
Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:20:20 +0000http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/?p=6643#comment-29106After 5 long years, the climatologists rant: ‘humans are responsible for global warming’, has finally been outed and dismissed as a MAN MADE MYTH!

………………………………………………………..

……………………

Are you still a doubter? Coldest weather in Chicago in 18yrs? Heavy snowfall in NY and DC so early in the winter season?

Can we believe anything our government tells us anymore?

GLOBAL WARMING PROOF IS EVAPORATING…

The 2013 hurricane season just ended as one of the five quietest years since 1960. But don’t expect anyone who pointed to last year’s hurricanes as “proof” of the need to act against global warming to apologize; the warmists don’t work that way.

Warmist claims of a severe increase in hurricane activity go back to 2005 and Hurricane Katrina. The cover of Al Gore’s 2009 book, “Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis,” even features a satellite image of the globe with four major hurricanes superimposed.

Yet the evidence to the contrary was there all along. Back in 2005 I and others reviewed the entire hurricane record, which goes back over a century, and found no increase of any kind. Yes, we sometimes get bad storms — but no more frequently now than in the past. The advocates simply ignored that evidence — then repeated their false claims after Hurricane Sandy last year.

And the media play along. For example, it somehow wasn’t front-page news that committed believers in man-made global warming recently admitted there’s been no surface global warming for well over a decade and maybe none for decades more. Nor did we see warmists conceding that their explanation is essentially a confession that the previous warming may not have been man-made at all.

That admission came in a new paper by prominent warmists in the peer-reviewed journal Climate Dynamics. They not only conceded that average global surface temperatures stopped warming a full 15 years ago, but that this “pause” could extend into the 2030s.

Mind you, the term “pause” is misleading in the extreme: Unless and until it resumes again, it’s just a “stop.” You don’t say a bullet-ridden body “paused” breathing.

Remarkably, that stoppage has practically been a state secret. Just five years ago, the head of the International Panel on Climate Change, the group most associated with “proving” that global warming is man-made and has horrific potential consequences, told Congress that Earth is running a “fever” that’s “apt to get much worse.” Yet he and IPCC knew the warming had stopped a decade earlier.

Those who pointed this out, including yours truly, were labeled “denialists.” Yet the IPCC itself finally admitted the “pause” in its latest report.

The single most damning aspect of the “pause” is that, because it has occurred when “greenhouse gases” have been pouring into the atmosphere at record levels, it shows at the very least that something natural is at play here. The warmists suggest that natural factors have “suppressed” the warming temporarily, but that’s just a guess: The fact is, they have nothing like the understanding of the climate that they claimed (and their many models that all showed future warming mean nothing, since they all used essentially the same false information).

If Ma Nature caused the “pause,” can’t this same lady be responsible for the warming observed earlier? You bet! Fact is, the earth was cooling and warming long before so-called GHGs could have been a factor. A warm spell ushered in the Viking Age, and many scientists believe recent warming was merely a recovery from what’s called “the Little Ice Age” that began around 1300.

Yet none of this unsettles the rush to kill debate. The Los Angeles Times has even announced that it will no longer print letters to the editor questioning man-made global warming. Had the Times been printing before Columbus, perhaps it would have banned letters saying the Earth was round.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration continues to push to reduce supposed global-warming emissions. Last month, the president even signed an executive order establishing a Council on Climate Preparedness and Resilience that could dramatically expand government bureaucrats’ ability to restrict Americans’ use of their property, water and energy to reduce so-called “greenhouse gas emissions.”

Such attempted reductions in other countries have proved incredibly expensive, while barely reducing emissions. But damn the stubbornly weak economy, says President Obama, full speed ahead!

This, even as new data show that last year the US median wage hit its lowest level since 1998 and long-term unemployment is almost the highest ever.

People have a right to religious and cult beliefs within reason. But the warmists have been proved wrong time and again, each time reacting with little more than pictures of forlorn polar bears on ice floes and trying to shut down the opposition. (More bad timing: Arctic ice increased by almost a third this past year, while that at the South Pole was thicker and wider than it’s been in 35 years.)

In war and in science, the bloodiest conflicts always seem to be the religious ones. Time for the American public to say it’s no longer going to play the victim in this one.

If you have been unsuccessful in accessing the Drudge link for National Review to the Delroy Murdock story, Nelson Mandela, RIP, you are not alone. I’ve been unable to access the story from my desktop to reprint it here because apparently the story has been blacklisted from viewership by the WH. The link to the story seems to be jammed in the hopes you will just go away and forget about it….

………………………………

Anyway, I am able to repost a comment.

What is truly lost on the press is that Mandela fought a government that is like the one Obama is creating/leading. A corrupt and vile parasite that will harm anyone with a differing philosophy. Mandela fought a government that suppressed the peoples freedom based on race. Obama wants to suppress the freedom of those who have a different philosophy.

You saw the ugly and malignant Obama government during the partial shutdown – when it rose to show the fangs and venom of an entity that deliberately tried to harm veterans, the cancer treatment for children, Amber alerts, etc..

You see the IRS deliberately going after conservative business owners, denying the same treatment to “Tea Party” groups that other “friendly” groups receive from the government …. the exemption from Obama care for liberals, Reid’s staff, unions and others. They’re exempt from the horrendous “medical” networks that will result in the death of regular citizens. Government “friendlies” will receive better treatment.

Obama is the epitome of everything Nelson Mandela fought against. A “dictator wannabe” Obama has nothing in common with Mandela other than (just, barely about) color..

It is an insult for Obama to wrap himself in Mandela’s cloak of greatness, because Mandela would scorn Obama for what he is dong right now…. a brutal government is a brutal government, no matter the leader’s skin color.

“People need to be held accountable. She admits she knew about it but clearly did not “Report” it. She is now Complicit of knowingly breaking the law. This is criminal and should be prosecuted.

I’m tired of people committing crimes against Americans and hiding under the Umbrella of “Government” or “Company”. Well , people “run” Governments and Companies. That means People are responsible and can be held accountable.

If you know about a “crime” or something “unethical” and you do not expose and Report it, you are Complicit.

Look what “I was just following orders” did for those at the Nuremberg Trials. You Traitors and Criminals and especially people committing these crimes against Humanity. You will be held accountable when this Illegal President and Government are thrown out.”

]]>Comment on EX-NAVY SEAL DROPS BOMBSHELL: Says Government Is CREATING Conditions To Impose Martial Law ! by Tellurianhttps://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/ex-navy-seal-drops-bombshell-says-government-is-creating-conditions-to-impose-martial-law/comment-page-2/#comment-29053
Sat, 23 Nov 2013 04:33:08 +0000http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/?p=6643#comment-29053Nice to see you, nomobama. The democrats behavior is despicable. I’m under the impression they are deliberately pissing off as many people as they can through every venue of government. By the time 2016 rolls around people will be spitting on any candidate running as a Democrat never-mind voting for one. Obama and his shrewd passel of political operatives have played this game out on the chessboard. They know they can’t beat Hillary politically; therefore their only recourse is bury her logistically. Turning the democratic party into the scourge of the earth- worse than Cancer… Reid doing away with the filibuster the other day, was the biggest sign to date they are allowing the party to self-implode leaving the party with no viable support for Hillary should she run…

I hope Bill is charting plan B.. I think it’s too high a mountain to climb for remaking the party over and believable in time for 2016. Obama and Reid are burning the Dem party down to the ground leaving it in nothing but ashes for Hillary. I don’t know if a re branding of the party name (the new democrat party) would be enough or if voters would believe she would not be Obama2 because of her public support of Obama’s policies. It’s Risky Business!

]]>Comment on EX-NAVY SEAL DROPS BOMBSHELL: Says Government Is CREATING Conditions To Impose Martial Law ! by nomobamahttps://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/ex-navy-seal-drops-bombshell-says-government-is-creating-conditions-to-impose-martial-law/comment-page-2/#comment-29048
Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:55:47 +0000http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/?p=6643#comment-29048It would be nice to have a viable third party to be the alternative to Democrats and their “Democrat-lite” cousins. Yet, I think that it would only be a matter of time before corrupting influences would show their ugly heads within any new political party. I am disgusted with the Democrats who show themselves like Demonrats. The Republicans of the RINO persuasion are not much better. Sometimes I wonder if there is any politician with clout that actually supports the Constitution as written, and who would do anything in his or her powers to defend it against the constant attacks that are made against it as a means of de-legitamizing it. I am floating around in Libertarian land at this time, watching the demise of the USA while hoping that a constitutionalist Libertarian comes to the rescue.
]]>Comment on EX-NAVY SEAL DROPS BOMBSHELL: Says Government Is CREATING Conditions To Impose Martial Law ! by Tellurianhttps://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/ex-navy-seal-drops-bombshell-says-government-is-creating-conditions-to-impose-martial-law/comment-page-2/#comment-28999
Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:12:47 +0000http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/?p=6643#comment-28999After reading this article published yesterday, it stimulated more questions in my mind no one out there in broadcast newsland is asking…. Then after carefully re-reading the article once again… What reveals itself is yet another ‘slight of hand’ trick pulled off by Obama and his band of mischief makers using the placement of misleading nuanced words and phrases giving the impression they are in compliance with Obama’s promises made to the People in getting the ACA passed into Law.

The language in quotes… commonly known as, ‘Obama Doublespeak’, used by him when it is necessary to give the impression he intends on honoring the promises made to the People after the law is passed, as he campaigned with his ACA Sales Pitch.

So, let’s begin… read the words closely… watching for words and phrases that can be taken within the context of duality…

……………..

Perks Ease Way in Health Plans for Lawmakers

WASHINGTON — Members of Congress like to boast that they will have the same health care enrollment experience as constituents struggling with the balky federal website, because the law they wrote forced lawmakers to get coverage from the new insurance exchanges.

That is true. As long as their constituents have access to “in-person support sessions” like the ones being conducted at the Capitol and congressional office buildings by the local exchange and four major insurers. Or can log on to a special Blue Cross and Blue Shield website for members of Congress and use a special toll-free telephone number — a “dedicated congressional health insurance plan assistance line.”

And then there is the fact that lawmakers have a larger menu of “gold plan” insurance choices than most of their constituents have back home.

While millions of Americans have been left to fend for themselves and go through the frustrating experience of trying to navigate the federal exchange, members of Congress and their aides have all sorts of assistance to help them sort through their options and enroll.

Lawmakers and the employees who work in their “official offices” will receive coverage next year through the small-business marketplace of the local insurance exchange, known as D.C. Health Link, which has staff members close at hand for guidance.

“D.C. Health Link set up shop right here in Congress,” said Eleanor Holmes Norton, the delegate to the House from the nation’s capital.

Insurers routinely offer “member services” to enrollees. But on Capitol Hill, the phrase has special meaning, indicating concierge-type services for members of Congress.

If lawmakers have questions about Aetna plan benefits and provider networks, they can call a special phone number that provides “member services for members of Congress and staff.”

…………………………………

There is a vast difference in the experience dealing with the Health Care Providers insuring Congressional members, the coverage and government’s subsidy they are getting for their money, the accessibility to guidance and most of all NOT dealing with convicted felons who may use their private personal information purporting ID theft.. This in direct contrast to the horror stories of navigators purposely hired without background checks to help the common folk choose an insurance plan being arrested…..
and more after the jump…..

AND… the biggest notation of ALL no one is asking about?

NO COMPUTER GLITCHES WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL WEBSITE!!!!

HOW COME?

……………………………………………

On the website run by the Obama administration for 36 states, it is notoriously difficult to see the prices, deductibles and other details of health plans.

It is much easier for members of Congress and their aides to see and compare their

on websites run by the Senate, the House and the local exchange.

Lawmakers can select from 112 options offered in the “gold tier” of the District of Columbia exchange, far more than are available to most of their constituents.

Aetna is offering eight plan options to members of Congress, and Blue Cross and Blue Shield is offering 16. Eight are available from Kaiser Permanente, and 80 are on sale from the UnitedHealth Group.

Lawmakers and their aides are not eligible for tax credit subsidies, but the government pays up to 75 percent of their premiums, contributing a maximum of $5,114 a year for individual coverage and $11,378 for family coverage. The government contribution is based on the same formula used for most other federal employees.

In debates leading up to passage of the Affordable Care Act, members of both parties suggested that all Americans should have coverage as good as what Congress had. President Obama said in 2009 that people should be able to buy insurance in a marketplace, or exchange, “the same way that federal employees do, same way that members of Congress do.”

For decades, members of Congress have received coverage through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. They generally like their coverage, but — like millions of Americans facing the loss of their policies next year — they cannot keep it.

In the past, if lawmakers did nothing in the open enrollment period, their coverage would automatically continue. This year, by contrast, they must affirmatively pick a plan. Their coverage under the federal employee program will end on Dec. 31. If they do not choose a plan via D.C. Health Link by Dec. 9, they will lose the government contribution to their premiums and could lose their right to retiree health benefits as well.

(NOT A BIG DEAL FOR LEGISLATORS WHO MAKE THE LAWS- THEY CAN ARBITRARILY CHANGE THEM AND NO ONE WILL BE THE WISER. right?)

In addition, lawmakers who go without insurance next year may, like other Americans, be subject to tax penalties.

In the home stretch of the 2012 presidential campaign, from August to September, the unemployment rate fell sharply — raising eyebrows from Wall Street to Washington.

The decline — from 8.1 percent in August to 7.8 percent in September — might not have been all it seemed. The numbers, according to a reliable source, were manipulated.

And the Census Bureau, which does the unemployment survey, knew it.

Just two years before the presidential election, the Census Bureau had caught an employee fabricating data that went into the unemployment report, which is one of the most closely watched measures of the economy.

And a knowledgeable source says the deception went beyond that one employee — that it escalated at the time President Obama was seeking reelection in 2012 and continues today.

“He’s not the only one,” said the source, who asked to remain anonymous for now but is willing to talk with the Labor Department and Congress if asked.

The Census employee caught faking the results is Julius Buckmon, according to confidential Census documents obtained by The Post. Buckmon told me in an interview this past weekend that he was told to make up information by higher-ups at Census.

Ironically, it was Labor’s demanding standards that left the door open to manipulation.

Labor requires Census to achieve a 90 percent success rate on its interviews — meaning it needed to reach 9 out of 10 households targeted and report back on their jobs status.

Census currently has six regions from which surveys are conducted. The New York and Philadelphia regions, I’m told, had been coming up short of the 90 percent.

Philadelphia filled the gap with fake interviews.

“It was a phone conversation — I forget the exact words — but it was, ‘Go ahead and fabricate it’ to make it what it was,” Buckmon told me.

Census, under contract from the Labor Department, conducts the household survey used to tabulate the unemployment rate.

Interviews with some 60,000 household go into each month’s jobless number, which currently stands at 7.3 percent. Since this is considered a scientific poll, each one of the households interviewed represents 5,000 homes in the US.

Buckmon, it turns out, was a very ambitious employee. He conducted three times as many household interviews as his peers, my source said.

By making up survey results — and, essentially, creating people out of thin air and giving them jobs — Buckmon’s actions could have lowered the jobless rate.

Buckmon said he filled out surveys for people he couldn’t reach by phone or who didn’t answer their doors.

But, Buckmon says, he was never told how to answer the questions about whether these nonexistent people were employed or not, looking for work, or have given up.

But people who know how the survey works say that simply by creating people and filling out surveys in their name would boost the number of folks reported as employed.

Census never publicly disclosed the falsification. Nor did it inform Labor that its data was tainted.

“Yes, absolutely they should have told us,” said a Labor spokesman. “It would be normal procedure to notify us if there is a problem with data collection.”

Census appears to have looked into only a handful of instances of falsification by Buckmon, although more than a dozen instances were reported, according to internal documents.

In one document from the probe, Program Coordinator Joal Crosby was ask in 2010, “Why was the suspected … possible data falsification on all (underscored) other survey work for which data falsification was suspected not investigated by the region?”

On one document seen by The Post, Crosby hand-wrote the answer: “Unable to determine why an investigation was not done for CPS,” or the Current Population Survey — the official name for the unemployment report.

With regard to the Consumer Expenditure survey, only four instances of falsification were looked into, while 14 were reported.

I’ve been suspicious of the Census Bureau for a long time.

During the 2010 Census report — an enormous and costly survey of the entire country that goes on for a full year — I suspected (and wrote in a number of columns) that Census was inexplicably hiring and firing temporary workers.

I suspected that this turnover of employees was being done purposely to boost the number of new jobs being report each month. (The Labor Department does not use the Census Bureau for its other monthly survey of new jobs — commonly referred to as the Establishment Survey.)

Last week I offered to give all the information I have, including names, dates and charges to Labor’s inspector general.

I’m waiting to hear back from Labor.

I hope the next stop will be Congress, since manipulation of data like this not only gives voters the wrong impression of the economy but also leads lawmakers, the Federal Reserve and companies to make uninformed decisions.

To cite just one instance, the Fed is targeting the curtailment of its so-called quantitative easing money-printing/bond-buying fiasco to the unemployment rate for which Census provided the false information.

So falsifying this would, in essence, have dire consequences for the country.

]]>Comment on EX-NAVY SEAL DROPS BOMBSHELL: Says Government Is CREATING Conditions To Impose Martial Law ! by Tellurianhttps://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/ex-navy-seal-drops-bombshell-says-government-is-creating-conditions-to-impose-martial-law/comment-page-2/#comment-28978
Sun, 17 Nov 2013 20:39:28 +0000http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/?p=6643#comment-28978In case you missed them, the WSJ has several articles that are a good read…
……………………

“When the Obama Magic Died”

There were no economic or cultural bonds among his coalition. He was all things to all people. Charisma ruled.

By
Fouad Ajami
Nov. 14, 2013

The current troubles of the Obama presidency can be read back into its beginnings. Rule by personal charisma has met its proper fate. The spell has been broken, and the magician stands exposed. We need no pollsters to tell us of the loss of faith in Mr. Obama’s policies—and, more significantly, in the man himself. Charisma is like that. Crowds come together and they project their needs onto an imagined redeemer. The redeemer leaves the crowd to its imagination: For as long as the charismatic moment lasts—a year, an era—the redeemer is above and beyond judgment. He glides through crises, he knits together groups of varied, often clashing, interests. Always there is that magical moment, and its beauty, as a reference point.

It’s no accident that the English-speaking nations are the ones most devoted to law and individual rights, writes Daniel Hannan

By
Daniel Hannan
Nov. 15, 2013

Asked, early in his presidency, whether he believed in American exceptionalism, Barack Obama gave a telling reply. “I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism.”

The first part of that answer is fascinating (we’ll come back to the Greeks in a bit). Most Brits do indeed believe in British exceptionalism. But here’s the thing: They define it in almost exactly the same way that Americans do. British exceptionalism, like its American cousin, has traditionally been held to reside in a series of values and institutions: personal liberty, free contract, jury trials, uncensored newspapers, regular elections, habeas corpus, open competition, secure property, religious pluralism.

The conceit of our era is to assume that these ideals are somehow the natural condition of an advanced society—that all nations will get around to them once they become rich enough and educated enough. In fact, these ideals were developed overwhelmingly in the language in which you are reading these words. You don’t have to go back very far to find a time when freedom under the law was more or less confined to the Anglosphere: the community of English-speaking democracies.

In August 1941, when Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill met on the deck of HMS Prince of Wales off Newfoundland, no one believed that there was anything inevitable about the triumph of what the Nazis and Communists both called “decadent Anglo-Saxon capitalism.” They called it “decadent” for a reason. Across the Eurasian landmass, freedom and democracy had retreated before authoritarianism, then thought to be the coming force. Though a small number of European countries had had their parliamentary systems overthrown by invaders, many more had turned to autocracy on their own, without needing to be occupied: Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain.

OMG – Nothing is real. The whole government seems to be staged. How did this stay hidden for all those years?
===

Actor Was Hired to Make Obama Look Presidential – A Decade Before He Was Elected

The biggest fairy tale ever…

Chicago radio host Eric “Mancow” Muller claimes on Friday that actor Harry Lennix was hired to make Obama look presidential a decade before he was elected president.

The Examiner reported:

Chicago radio host Eric ‘Mancow’ Muller claimed during an appearance on the Alex Jones Show Friday that actor Harry Lennix told him he was hired to train Barack Obama how to look and act presidential more than a decade before Obama was elected president. Lennix, a Chicago native, is best known for his role as General Swanwick in the recent Superman: Man of Steel movie, and for his role as White House Chief of Staff in the ABC television series Commander in Chief.

Muller, who knew Obama in Chicago years before he was elected president, said on Alex Jones radio show that Lennix told him that, “He was the actor hired to teach Obama to be Harry Lennix, watch The Blacklist and you can see Obama, this is an actor that we hired to be our president.”

Lest we forget Karl Rove’s involvement tutoring Obama in the art of winning elections; after he failed at his first attempt running for the Chicago state senate.. Rove’s suggestion was..: (famous last words) become a “community organizer”. So, this was not a staged effort just from the LEFT as some people think… This was a JOINT effort by BOTH parties selecting and hiring a puppet president both parties could control for bringing the US easily and with little protest or confrontation to the globalist agenda of ‘The New World Order’.

Thus, we can establish a time frame for the beginning of the ‘Great Lies’ to come full circle exposing Obama’s gross detachment and distorted thinking from the reality of the real world. Obama began propagating his first big lie in the spring of 07′ on the campaign trail with an oral embellishment of his (sketchy) Curriculum Vitae elevating himself from an intermittent p/t senior lecturer to the unearned title of a “Constitutional Law Professor”.

There is a difference, as you read on here:

“Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor,” most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when he said, “I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president (Bush2), I actually respect the Constitution.” A spokesman for the Republican National Committee immediately took exception to Obama’s remarks, pointing out that Obama’s title at the University of Chicago was “senior lecturer” and not “professor.”

Recently, Hillary Clinton’s campaign has picked up on this charge. In a March 27 conference call with reporters, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer claimed:

Singer (March 27): Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response.

Big media is as responsible as Obama for continuing to coverup and propagate rather than expose Obama’s Lies. Their dereliction of duty demanding the Truth be told in the interests of the public trust and clarification of statements made by candidates running for the US presidency has brought us to this sad, chaotic situation we find ourselves in today with the ACA that detrimentally affects every American.

This is definitely Obama’s Swan Song as president of the US. His next stop Hollywood. He has earned his acting credits honing his craft for the last five years at the expense of the American people. Mr England, send him a script- ‘Nightmare on Pennsylvania Avenue’, it;s a natural fit.