Ancient Greek: I try to follow a reconstructed early-mid Attic pronunciation (around 400 BC) for Ancient Greek, in an attempt at representing the midpoint of the Classical period. Therefore, I maintain aspiration and the polytonic pitch accent, while allowing the vowels to be in a sort of transitional state towards the beginning of Koine Greek, with diphthongs not yet entirely monophthongizing but assimilating.

Latin: My pronunciation approximates that of early to mid Classical Latin, with perhaps some variability as to the tenseness or laxness of short vowels in open and closed syllables. I am uncertain as to the nature of the Latin stress accent, so I have represented it mostly with a raised pitch on the accented syllable, if only because my microphone has the tendency to fluctuate slightly in volume.

Sanskrit: Although I'm using an early Classical Sanskrit pronunciation, I've kept the Vedic pitch accent in my pronunciations for reference, since stress is otherwise not significantly contrastive. I ask that you forgive the anachronism (which is nonetheless preserved in chants) in order to provide the userbase with the more likely query for the classical pronunciation.

Middle Chinese: My pronunciation attempts to approximate the reconstruction of the mid to late Tang dynasty, and perhaps is similar to the Middle Chinese reconstructions of Zhengzhang Shangfang, Wang Li, and Li Rong, in that order. As such, the differences between the vowels in the finals are somewhat subtle; on top of that, audial fidelity can not be perfectly preserved in a digital format. Nonetheless, I believe this only adds to informative nature of my pronunciations, allowing us to see how the pronunciation has some room to drift towards the different descendant Chinese dialectal pronunciations today. Although there has been some debate as to the exact nature of the tones, based on some contemporary descriptions, I've chosen a low to mid-level pitch for 平, a rising contour for 上, a falling contour for 去, and a mid-level checked 入.