Abstract

Déjà vu is characterized by the recognition of a situation concurrent with the awareness that this recognition is inappropriate. Although forms of déjà vu resolve in favor of the inappropriate recognition and therefore have behavioral consequences, typical déjà vu experiences resolve in favor of the awareness that the sensation of recognition is inappropriate. The resultant lack of behavioral modification associated with typical déjà vu means that clinicians and experimenters rely heavily on self-report when observing the experience. In this review, we focus on recent déjà vu research. We consider issues facing neuropsychological, neuroscientific, and cognitive experimental frameworks attempting to explore and experimentally generate the experience. In doing this, we suggest the need for more experimentation and a more cautious interpretation of research findings, particularly as many techniques being used to explore déjà vu are in the early stages of development.

• Vignal JP, Maillard L, McGonigal A, Chauvel P: The dreamy state: hallucinations of autobiographic memory evoked by temporal lobe stimulations and seizures. Brain 2007, 130:88–99. In the mold of John Hughlings Jackson’s formative work in the field, Vignal et al. examine memory hallucinations associated with cortical stimulation and epileptic seizure. They report that the resulting “dreamy states” associated with activation in mesial temporal structure often include déjà vécu but are less likely to occur if there is an early spread of electrical discharge to the temporal neocortex.Google Scholar

• Moulin CJ, Chauvel P: Déjà vu: insights from the dreamy state and the neuropsychology of memory. In New Frontiers in Applied Memory Research. Edited by Davies G, Wright D. Hove, NY: Psychology Press; 2010:206–236. In this recent review, the authors explore both clinical and experimental déjà vu research. They emphasize the importance of communication between the two domains, particularly the role that cognitive experimental psychology has in informing the understanding and care of people with pathological manifestations of déjà vu.Google Scholar

26.

•• O’Connor AR, Lever C, Moulin CJA: Novel insights into false recollection: a model of déjà vécu. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2010 (in press). We review cases of déjà vécu and propose a novel, testable theory of déjà vécu formation that is consistent with the behavior exhibited by these patients. We posit that déjà vécu results from a dephasing of novelty signaling such that in regions downstream of this dephasing, novelty is misinterpreted as recollection.Google Scholar

Orne MT: On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol 1962, 17:776–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45.

• Cleary AM, Ryals AJ, Nomi JS: Can déjà vu result from similarity to a prior experience? Support for the similarity hypothesis of déjà vu. Psychon Bull Rev 2009, 16:1082–1088. Cleary et al. increased reports of experimentally generated déjà vu using an RWCR procedure and emphasized the role of familiarity in the formation of the experience. They proposed future work to clarify the relationship between déjà vu and familiarity.Google Scholar