The chairman of the inquiry into the UK's decision - under former Prime Minister Tony Blair - to join the US in an invasion of Iraq in 2003 has said that - based on the evidence in front of him - Blair's assessment of Iraq President Saddam Hussein's "imminent threat" to Britain was "unreasonable."

In a tense exchange in front of MPs on the House of Commons Liaison Committee, Wednesday (November 2) Sir John Chilcot — who chaired the Iraq Inquiry — said that he could not defend the conclusion reached by Blair ahead of invasion, March 20, 2003, that Hussein presented an "imminent danger" to Britain.

A statue of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in front of building of the Iraqi Olympic Committee 09 April 2003. The US tanks and troops poured into the heart of Baghdad as the Iraqi leader's regime collapsed after a blistering three-week onslaught.

Blair was heavily criticized in the Chilcot report into Britain's part in the invasion of Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003, which followed mass protests against the war, which left Iraq destabilized for years.

The inquiry into the Iraq invasion, headed by Sir John Chilcot, found that policy on Iraq was based on flawed intelligence and assessments and that the legal case for going to war was "far from satisfactory."

Cross Examination

Called before MPs for the first time since his report was published, Sir John Chilcot faced cross examination from the chairman of the committee, Andrew Tyrie MP. Tyrie asked Sir John: "In your view, in sum, did we need to go to war to protect Britain from an imminent threat?"

Sir John replied: "Not in March 2003. There was no imminent threat to British citizens or, indeed, Britain itself, from Saddam's regime in Iraq."

Tyrie quoted a speech delivered by Blair on March 18, 2003 — two days before invasion — in which he said "the possibility […] of terrorist groups in possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction even of a so-called dirty radiological bomb — is now, in my judgement, a real and present danger."

Tyrie put it to Sir John that, in saying that, "he wasn't, in fact, reflecting the advice or the information that he had in front of him, was he? He was telling the public — by all means other than those two words 'imminent threat' — that there was an imminent threat."

Sir John replied that Blair had been told the previous day — March 17 —by the chair of the Joint Intelligence Committee that Saddam did have WMD and the means to deploy them and the means to produce them.

"If you convert that into advice that there was an imminent threat, you could just about defend it, perhaps," Sir John said.

Tyrie asked: "Are you defending it?"

Sir John replied swiftly: "No."

Tyrie asked again: "Was it reasonable for Tony Blair — at that time that he made that statement — to suppose that there was an imminent threat?"

Sir John replied: "Objectively, no."

HoC Liaison Comm

Q: Was Blair more interested in evaluating the evidence, or in making the case for war?#Chilcot says it was the second

He said Blair's cabinet had over-egged Hussein's military capabilities. "The judgements about the severity of the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction — WMD — were presented with a certainty that was not justified. Despite explicit warnings, the consequences of the invasion were underestimated. The planning and preparations for Iraq after Saddam Hussein were wholly inadequate," said Sir John.

Hello,
!

We are committed to protecting your personal information and we have updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a new EU regulation that went into effect on May 25, 2018.

Please review our Privacy Policy. It contains details about the types of data we collect, how we use it, and your data protection rights.

Since you already shared your personal data with us when you created your personal account, to continue using it, please check the box below:

I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site, in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

If you do not want us to continue processing your data, please click here to delete your account.

promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;

contains links to viruses and malicious software;

is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");

“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;

violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");

doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.