Trevor Parscal wrote:
> Derek Parnell wrote:
>> On the other hand, why are you using 'inout'? Wouldn't a simple 'in'
>> work?
>
> Yes, in worked fine... dumb mistake.. Thanks!
>
It was a mistake *this* time. But it *SHOULD* work with inout.
To me this sounds like something that should be submitted to
d.D.bugs. (Which version of D are you using?)
(OTOH, I'm no expert. Perhaps someone who is would care to comment?)

Charles Hixson wrote:
> It was a mistake *this* time. But it *SHOULD* work with inout. To me
> this sounds like something that should be submitted to d.D.bugs. (Which
> version of D are you using?)
Latest.. 0.127
--
Thanks,
Trevor Parscal
www.trevorparscal.com
trevorparscal@hotmail.com