Why are we only allowed to say nice things about games we’re passionate about? That’s not what constructive criticism is you dumb fuck. Get your conceded ass outta here and fuck off. We give real feedback unlike “this game is so good zomg!!!!! I can’t wait *laughing emoji* *laughing emoji*”.

The game is going to be noob fest unbalanced shit….. seriously who thought of the guns that if you get a double kill your gun reloads automatically or kill a guy and get healed……this is bullshit that helps those kids that are terrible at cod…..personally is see that this is sad since this is the first cod I’m not going to get since mw2……going to battlefield

TMZ Censored Me

Reed–Sternberg cells are cells found with light microscopy in biopsies from individuals with Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Ethan Sluga

What?

Psycho2194

Sounds like a reference to cancer. Very plausible, given the nature of this game.

ToonToons22

Terminal cancer, because this game is what killed Call of Duty.

Psycho2194

I think the three year dev cycle hurt the game more than it did for it.

I honestly can’t wrap that around my head as to how games with a three year cycle are worse than the ones with the 2 year dev cycle. Games like MW2, BO1 are far better than these latest games. BO3 in my opinion is honestly the only one they did pretty well in the three year dev cycle.

CoDforever

because the cod games made in 2 year cycles are copy pastes of older cods with a new theme slapped onto them and new map designs, 2 years would have never given them enough time to make advanced movement

Because this isn’t an Infinite Warfare site, it’s a CoD site. I’ve been a fan of the series since 2008. It’s just my opinion on IW.

CoDforever

I dont care what anyone says, the campaign for Infinite Warfare will be AMAZING, 100%

Psycho2194

Hopefully. That’s all it has going for it.

CoDforever

Yep, only good thing thats coming out of this game, other than CoD4 remastered.

Zombies looks too goofy for my taste and MP is downright awful. Ah well, atleast I will enjoy All or nothing and infected for a while.

BradyAlucard

Zombies might not be too goofy. We’ll know more on Monday. As for the Multiplayer I wouldn’t say it’s awful because that puts it up against Ghosts and Advanced Warfare… and it’s not even close. Infinite Warfare destroys them.

CoDforever

whats happening on monday?

RdJokr

Something Zombies related. It’s Halloween btw.

BradyAlucard

They’re showing off Zombies, at least the intro cutscene. There’s a leak here though if you want it. https://vid.me/U9P2

CoDforever

Oh shit any more leaks?

BradyAlucard

Full camo leaks such as [SPOILER ALERT] Solar (new) and Black Sky (Dark Matter), OSA and Intervention footage, a new map called ‘Genesis’ that has a Dome-like layout, a UI/background change, etc. If you go on the Infinite Warfare Reddit and keep refreshing the page for the week leading up to IW’s launch. https://www.reddit.com/r/Infinitewarfare/

Filthy Prank’d

For all we know, Zombies in Spaceland is goofy overall. If IW decided to change up the atmosphere of Zombies maps on their DLCs, then that could cater to everyone, like futuristic space zombie survival, or maybe even modern setting.

CoDforever

“You Know Nothing – Kill Kotch before his speech ends.” Oh my god

faze harambae

Do I wanna ask?

CoDforever

Its a game of thrones reference

Dre

Who gives a flying fuck about trophies anyways. 12 year olds maybe. Judging by the intellect of the posts on this site that would mean most of you.

I just don’t understand. Campaign looks amazing because they took major risks and it payed of big time. Zombies looks amazing because they took major risks and it payed of big time. Multiplayer they played it so safe it is regarded as the worst Multiplayer in CoD history. Come on Infinity Ward MP look at those two slashing examples and get your shit together.

What else could they have done that Black Ops 3 and AW haven’t? I think it’s clear they have ran out of ideas when it comes to the futuristic setting. I also could have sworn that the Multiplayer maps on different planets were going to have a gameplay difference yet the Terminal map which is on the Moon plays just like a regular map on Earth. Samething for Forst. Am I the only one that remembers the Infinity Ward devs said that about MP when it first got revealed?

I can just tell there didn’t need to be Thrust movement in the game. The maps work really well without it. I would just keep the wallrunning on some parts of the maps to go for the risk VS reward system.

I didn’t say they are exactly the same. Jesus dude, are you missing chunks of your brain or something? Do i gotta knock on your head to wake that thing up?

w

how could you have gotten that from reading his post? He said nothing like that. Reread it and if you still haven’t gotten his point by reading it a second time, then it’s time to stop posting.

Stefan Lang

Well would you prefer everything being zero gravity on space maps? Logically that’s how it should be but be honest, if people were floating around in slow motion on space maps IW would have gotten 10x more shit that it already has 😂

I prefer Infinity Ward to be honest in what they’re saying or at least address things when shit gets changed or doesn’t make it through. If there was some gravity differences i probably would have liked it and it would have separated it from Black Ops 3 somewhat. Plus it would probably help because when I played the beta, shit was way too fast paced even for a Call of Duty game

I don’t agree with that. I enjoyed my time with the BETA. I had a lot of fun during the second weekend more then I though I would. But that is what the majority of the gaming community is saying.

bsktballmsu1

how did they play MP safe? they added a bunch of stuff that shouldn’t be in the game. They took a huge risk in MP, and I’m not even referring to the movement system, and it has failed by community standards

RdJokr

I don’t think there’s any risks taken with the Campaign. I mean, it looks amazing, but nothing screams “risk taking” here. I’d love to be proven wrong though.

Sentinel

Too soon to talk about that now.

Batman

Zombies look like shit

Cabe Kase

I’m pretty sure the dlc is going to be crazy fun, their need to being boring for the boring players for a few months. AW and BO3 got weird after dec i think.

ToonToons22

Am I the only one who finds it very disappointing that people are more excited for a remaster rather than a brand new game? That’s because CoD has run out of ideas and has chosen to resort to space warfare, boost jumps, and childish customization options.

I will buy the Legacy Edition though, and give Infinite Warfare to my little brother. Call of Duty’s target audience is kids, anyway.

CoDforever

Calm down. Even if they made a WW2 cod people would be more excited for COD4 than it. A space cod could have been done right. Atleast the campaign still looks good.

And “running out of ideas”? This is actually the opposite (even though this game isnt good), running out of ideas would be recycling modern warfare for 4 games.

BradyAlucard

“even though this game isnt good” is thankfully just an opinion, because I’ve seen YouTubers like BlameTruth, Hutch, and even Eddy the Chump at least somewhat enjoy it (BT called it decent). It’s all a matter of perspective, as long as the YouTubers aren’t Tmartn or Ali-A or other YouTubers with their commentary styles I’ll at least trust them in regards to their honesty.

CoDforever

Honestly dude, just shut up. We both know you’re gonna fanboy the game until it comes out and then join the hate train 2 months later. Thats what you did for Bo3, and thats what you did for AW lol. Stop pretending

BradyAlucard

No, I won’t shut up, because I don’t care when people attempt to tell me what to do on the internet, and all you’re doing is nitpicking the game like Drift0r. But it’s funny how your hypocrisy shows by calling me a “fanboy” and saying that I’ll “join the hate train 2 months later”. It seems like you don’t know me very well, because I loved BO3, and find AW to not be nearly as bad outside of its life cycle.

How can be one be a fanboy when they see flaws? You’re just being stupid out of blind hatred now. Pay attention to my posts, because unlike fallacious fanboys, I at least attempt to be levelheaded and logical. Stop hopping on bandwagons and think for yourself.

CoDforever

You always defend the game before its out, and then a couple of months u later trash the game. Sure you may think differently of them now, you might just be changing your opinion just for the sake of this argument whatever, buts thats typically how I saw you. I rarely see you complimenting the games after they are out but you do it alot before release.

BradyAlucard

It may seem that way, but I always said that I enjoyed BO3 more than any other CoD since Black Ops 2, maybe even 1, and I’ve always complemented things like the movement and the Specialists. As for MW3, Ghosts, and AW, they’re much better than they were during their respective life cycles, therefore my opinion will change at least slightly. Sometimes the marketing hype takes over me before release and then it blows over a couple of months after the game releases, but that didn’t happen with BO3. I was mainly annoyed with the matchmaking and the fact that there are a couple of weapons that dominated the rest, but I’ve almost always stayed consistent about my feelings on BO3; that it’s overall a great experience, at least for CoD’s standards.

BradyAlucard

And FYI I’m not calling you stupid, but there’s no reason to hate the game. Titanfall 2’s tech test was, what, September? It’s far better now, so what would half the time do for Call of Duty? It’s not terrible, it was just a little chaotic and claustrophobic for my tastes, but those are simple tweaks.

Call of Duty should honestly stop worrying about “innovation” and just do what Battlefield does. Stay true to the series. There isnt much to do anyway. There will never be a Call of Duty like Call of Duty 4 again that revolutionized the series. It will never happen again. Like I said many times, if I dont see Call of Duty return to its roots next year, if I don’t see a boots on the ground historic shooter next year by Call of Duty and it’s just another futuristic shooter I’m turning away, not even a remaster is gonna reel me next year like it did to me this year

faze harambae

To be frank, in the ghosts reveal, infinity ward said they were gonna “create as many creative restrictions as possible”

So they’re making trash cods just to make it so cod from now on are great

RdJokr

The problem is, COD is an annual franchise. You can’t back away from that anymore. Shareholders need their annual dose of stock earnings from COD, or they invest in other things and Activision loses. So it needs innovation, or people get tired of it. I mean, look at BF Hardline. That’s what happens when you try to copy-paste BF4 for annual release, and you end up with a sub-par game that barely anyone remembers.

Lol what are you even trying to say? So Call of Duty is only in the future because of Activision share holders? Lol

RdJokr

I mean COD needs innovation because it’s an annual franchise. You cannot seriously tell me that you would rather have 3 years of modern warfare in a row. Things need to be changed. Battlefield doesn’t get slammed for having little changes with each title, because it has time to expand each game nice and slowly. There’s no annual rush for BF.

I don’t think it needs innovation honestly. And like I said before, I’m not saying do historic boots on the ground every year. And you can’t honestly think doing futuristic advanced movement every year is good for franchise either because it’s not. I said before plenty of times now that if this franchise wants to be fresh every year, it needs to do a different setting every year. Past, future, modern. Whatever order you like. That’s how it stays fresh. Advanced cookie cutter movement every year is no better if a WW2 setting happened every year.

RdJokr

While I think doing something different every year is OK, it’s not gonna work too well in the long run, because casual player have to readjust to the movement systems every year, which can be a pain for those who just want to pick up and play. It’s even worse for competitive guys, as every year it has to be something different. It can get super tiring, training your reflexes to accommodate the movement after getting used to one.

Call of Duty is a casual game. Doing a different setting wouldn’t mess that up. And competitive players? Aren’t the guys like the best and the end all be all? How would that be a problem with them? If they’re really that amazing and the game it wouldn’t be a problem

RdJokr

I think you might be overestimating the casual crowd. I am definitely above the casual level (though nowhere near tryhard), but I had trouble adjusting between AW and BO2 when I was playing both. Sometimes I keep trying to slide or double jump in BO2, sometimes I forget to do so in AW. I feel I’ll run into a similar situation this year with IW and MWR.

I mean yeah people can see it differently I suppose, but I for the life of me will never be able to understand what’s so difficult or tedious about switching settings/movement systems every year. Call of Duty is easy to pick up. I can sit here and play BO3 all and do fine and switch over to BO1 the next and do fine. Gameplay is similar in each game anyway

BradyAlucard

Yup. Activision is going to handle their business in their own way, and they felt that the futuristic era would be more open to innovation than the same old stale boots-on-the-ground games that are all very much alike (moreso than any other genre I’ve ever played besides MOBA’s personally) for some reason. But to be honest… I think that Activision could still remain consistent in terms of CoD sales if they keep doing at least somewhat generous gestures like remastered games for only $20 more and betas. Things like that, and they could be successful whether the new game at the time is innovative to the players or not.

If it weren’t for Battlefront (which is made by DICE, mind you), Battlefield would be an annual series. I don’t know how DICE magically made Battlefront and Battlefield 1 at the same time with the overall quality that those games have ($60 worthy or not, I’ve never been against claiming that they’re quality games overall). I have to compliment DICE for allowing literally all of their Premium maps to be given away for free in all of their Battlefield games in recent years. Activision has never done that and I doubt that they ever would, because they offer nothing else besides maps that cost very little and cancerous Supply Drops. Ridiculous.

I rather have a new boots on the ground CoD than a remaster every year. So

BradyAlucard

I’d rather have remasters because I want to see the old games with modern graphics. PC doesn’t do that for me because all they are are just the console versions with a very slight tune-up. I want them to remaster the graphics from the ground-up, to the point where it’s almost a remake, like MWR. After the introduction of advanced movement, with all of the work that has been put into it, boots-on-the-ground CoD games would be way too generic. There’s nothing they could do, so they might as well remaster the previous games, since a new one would be a copy and paste of them anyway.

I disagree a new historic boots on the ground would work greatly actually. Advanced futuristic movement games are so played out and boring now. Time to go back

BradyAlucard

I’d take an alternate history of either World War II or Vietnam with some sort of a larger innovation than recent boots-on-the-ground CoD games. Plus I’d need better/more and grosser gore across all game modes all-around (SP/Zombies/MP), and more dynamic maps in MP to set it apart, because anything less would make the experience stale.

Both are played out, but that’s only because nobody tries anymore. Boots-on-the-ground is far worse as far as being “played out” goes. Most Shooters are boots-on-the-ground and that isn’t the things that help their case.

Sure it is, you’ll see why once you play another boots-on-the-ground new CoD. Like all the other ones, you’ll always want more out of the experience and not want it to be so generic. At least IW has MWR to complement it when we get bored. Simple is good, but barebones is more boring than merely tolerating an era that some players don’t like.

Actually no not at all. Its better and it’s better for CoD. I like it much better and it’s far from boring. Advanced movement is far from exciting it’s more twitchy and casual. IW is completely generic lol. Future is boring. Sure it can stay, but not every year. I want a boots on the ground CoD that’s new. Too many remasters are happening.

BradyAlucard

You might think that way right now, but reskinning CoD 4 again like they’ve been doing until AW won’t cut it. I’m as in-favor of a World War II or Korean/Vientam game as much as the next guy, but I’m just being honest and logical here. I’d like to see some non-movement changes (maybe sliding and leaning) and non-killstreak vehicles, and an alternative take on past wars like Battlefield 1 so that the guns aren’t boring. Then me and boots-on-the-ground are square, but if it’s just another reskinned CoD 4, then that’s worse than how everyone made Infinite Warfare out to be with Black Ops 3.

I want more remasters because last generation games deserve to have graphics that are huge modern graphical improvements over their PC versions like Modern Warfare Remastered. Xbox One/PlayStation Now backwards compatibility won’t cut it, I need the games in 1080p with smoother frame rates, but no half-effort ports like Dishonored and such because those games are exactly why everyone complains about remasters.

Dont act like youre gonne be enjoying the game for awhile. You will come back here and start your whiney bitch routine.

Sentinel

Hmm I mean it is ok to come here an address something that should be tweaked or change, ect. but straight up bitching…. BlueMills, he called you out so Ima wait on it, see if element really is a man of his word.

Element115Will

Bluemills called me out lol? Please intrigue me.

Sentinel

Is the other way around.

Stefan Lang

Yeah after the next 5 games is in the same setting people will cry for something new again 😂

Sentinel

That is always the case with most COD players, they can never be satisfied for shit lmao

Stefan Lang

Exactly Lmao. Like damn of course most of the community miss boots on the ground but it’ll just get boring when they take shit back to ww2 and it’s literally the same shit over and over again

Sentinel

I mean, at least one world at war game on the COD engine running on next gen consoles would look very nice and fun to play. But I guess Activision feels like it is a threat to their sales since the target demographic is way different than before! Most gamer who played games back then like MW2 had no responsibilities and a lot of time to play. Now most of those players are grown ups and/or have no time to play COD like they use to.

bsktballmsu1

there are a lot of flaws with the game but at the same time so much stuff is OP that in a way it kinda balances some things. I enjoy it because there is a higher level of satisfaction that I can achieve such as getting a nuke but the game pisses me off more than blops 3 at the same time (Game is not as consistent as blops3)

Jon

You are so right. People have nothing better to do than bash a game that they will end up playing as much as they do every other COD game. sXeGreatness is the biggest hypocrite of them all. LOL….go read his past posts about some of the other game releases and you will see he is all talk…unless he has deleted them know that I called him out the other day.

For real! I think IW has the right formula when we talk about the gameplay. I found my self boots on ground more often than boosting up in the air. I also like how the transition from boost to wall run is smooth without any hiccups. The loading screen to start the match is so much quicker than past COD, like literlly…”you have 10 seconds” and next thing you know, you about to start the game, loved it. Btw, I don’t know about you but I have barely had any lag whatsoever! Only one match I lagged a couple of times but during the period of the beta, lag wasn’t that big of an issue!

jt3z

Lag comp was a problem for a lot of people but it did get better throughout the beta, and im sure it will mostly be fixed come release. Now i did have fun with the game but there are still some needed tweaks that need to be fixed. Sprint out time/Streaks(Buff)/ Spawns(Biggest problem for me)/TTK(A bit fast imo)/Map rotation

Sentinel

I only heard a few things here and there about lag comp. Sprint is fine/ I’m not a fan of streaks & I feel is just an aid for people that suck (more like specialist) Spawns can use some tweaks and the TTK was tuned out to be just right by the end of the beta. Map rotation is irrelevant since we only had just a few maps to play on.

jt3z

Streaks need to be strong. You cant have 1000+ Streaks be bad or are able to be shot down instantly like in Bo3

Sentinel

I guess so, maybe it would be buffed by the time they release IW

MichaelSwift

Your opinion is wrong.

Sentinel

Your opinion has wrong in it.

TMZ Censored Me

I agree. I sucked at the beta but still enjoyed it. The COD community is nothing but cancer. People either hate it because “it’s just a copy and paste” or “COD stole [insert idea here] from [insert game here].” I never understood why the same people come to this site just to talk to shit every time a post is made. I’m not a Battlefield fan but I don’t go to Battlefield forums and talk bad about the game. I guess I just have more of a life than those that have time to troll on the internet all day.

Sentinel

Like I said before, even after 2+ million dislikes, COD remains relevant. Despite the hate and negativity the community, people still make time to talk about it! I’m glad I have the mind to see thru all that.

Former

Seems like zombies actually has some depth to it judging from the achievements. This is good news to Treyarch zombie fans.

Gamerazor247

Wow, this game has “Gun scanning”, now if that isn’t a incentive to buy this game, I don’t know what is!

Khaled Hassan

There should be a trophy for playing the game with this broken ttk and sniper cheese

RdJokr

Huh… So they didn’t even change the name of Pack-A-Punch. That’s uh… a bit lazy, if you ask me. But at least the other stuffs are new.

Siftblade

“In Spaceland, unlock David Hasselhoff”

This is the greatest description for a trophy I’ve ever seen, especially out of context.

Sentinel

They are so good at keeping the zombies on lock without any leaks now…it just makes me so anxious to see how Infinity Ward’s taste of zombies might be.

My brother got Bo2 a week early cause a friend of his who works at Gamestop stole a bunch of copies and sold them cheap. No joke.

Sentinel

Savage, I know someone sold an early copy of MW3 on ebay for $1,000+ just after 4 days of it’s actual release. No joke.

Former

If you don’t believe me, that’s fine. No reason to try to be funny and fail pathetically.

Mr_ysi42t96

I would say a cursed bastard

CoDforever

whats on mondayyyyyyy???

Nathan

Usually the week of release is when you see leaks.

jt3z

Yea as Nathan said we will be getting leaks from now until release as some people get the game early

Daniel Hartranft

It looks like its gonna be good, I’m so tired of people crying about change it like guys we’ve been doing the same things in game for how long now glad that went in this direction at least they tried something new

Sentinel

The full game is not even out…yet people are jumping onto conclusion base on a beta, like always. Fucken air heads!

DEMOLITION12

commie faggot

Siftblade

i fuked ur mum

Candiceastephens4

Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !hy107f: On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it !hy107f: ➽➽ ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash397NetworkWorldwideGetPay$97Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!hy107f:….,………

imBATMAN

unlock david? sweet

Fegasaruasㅤ

getting 4-6 trophies thats it

Cabe Kase

I’m going for the boots on the ground one thats amazing. lol Best cod ever!!! I like how the dev;s seem to be just having fun with the game.

It’s funny that everybody hates on this game so much I actually enjoyed it and to all the people that did bitch about it “this games shit it’s horrible worse cod ever” I’ll see you November 4th 🙂

Zachary Strunk

I love how so many ppl are saying the only thing iw has going for it is its campaign. Am I the only one thinking that’s the trailer that got insane dislikes and now everyone’s praising it? Irony. CoD community is bipolar af. I personally liked the beta though and think the zombies looks rly unique. Not sure if it’s GOOD but it’s def different. We’ll see in a few hours I guess.