Search This Blog

Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

MCI's code of ethics gives docs way to accept freebies

The recently notified 'new' ethical guidelines of the Medical Council of India (MCI) are being touted as a bid to punish doctors accepting freebies from pharma companies. However, these guidelines, doctors fighting corruption in the profession point out, will legitimise doctors' associations taking money from the pharma industry.

While the guidelines elaborate the quantum of punishment for doctors on the basis of the value of favours or freebies received from pharma companies, they also include an amendment that ensures that doctors' associations are beyond the MCI's jurisdiction.

Under the Societies Registration Act, it takes just seven people to form an association. In effect, what is barred for an individual doctor can be done as soon as seven or more of them get together to form a society or association.

The guidelines are actually five years old, but were notified in the official gazette on February 1. Without them being notified by the government, they could not come into effect. As a result, the council could not allow associations to go scot free claiming that it has no jurisdiction over them.

These guidelines were framed by the MCI in March 2010, when Dr Ketan Desai, twice removed from the president's post on charges of corruption though not convicted, was heading the council. The new guidelines were meant to amend the Indian Medical Council (Professional conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002. The first amendment was to delete the words "and professional association of doctors" from section 6.8 of the Code of Medical Ethics Regulation 2002. Earlier, this section read: "code of conduct for doctors and professional association of doctors in their relationship with pharmaceutical and allied health sector industry". In the amended version, the words "professional association" have been deleted.

This was within months of the new code of ethics barring doctors and professional association of doctors from taking gifts and sponsorships from pharmaceutical and health sector industry being published in the gazette on December 14, 2009. According to the minutes of the central working committee meeting of the Indian Medical Association in June 2010 Dr Desai when asked about clause 6.8 regarding organisations had "promised that this would be rectified". That promise has now been fulfilled.

"This is a national shame. You are allowing a gang to do the corruption but not one person. It is plain and simple legalising of corruption. This gives legal sanction to pharma companies to bribe doctors and the poor will suffer as companies will go on paying doctors and the money will come from the pockets of the common man," said Dr G S Grewal, president of the Punjab Medical Council.

"This sudden hurry to notify the five-year-old guidelines is because it was recently reported in the media that the council cannot exonerate the IMA and other doctors' associations for taking money as the amendments were not notified.

Once notified, these so-called ethical guidelines may help to legitimise pharma bribes for doctors' associations," explained Dr KV Babu, who had complained against the IMA taking money from Pepsi and Dabur to endorse their products.

The absurdity of making something illegal for individual doctors but legit for their associations was pointed out in a submission made by the MCI in the Delhi High Court in 2011. It said, "what is not allowed to be done directly, cannot be permitted to be done indirectly" and that it was unsustainable to argue that what an individual doctor cannot do can be done by doctors forming an association.

This submission was in a case involving the IMA taking money from private companies and was made during the tenure of the Board of Governors (BoG), who ran MCI after it was disbanded in 2010. Yet, the reconstituted medical council that replaced the government-appointed BoG in 2013 reverted to the stance that it had no jurisdiction over doctors' associations.

Popular posts from this blog

As per the directives of the Honourable Supreme Court in its judgment dated,25.9.87, in writ petition No. 348-352 of 1985, all the State Governments, Medical Institutions and Universities are required to amend their rules and regulations to introduce a uniform residency scheme by 1993
“A uniform practice has to be evolved so that the discipline would be introduced. We accordingly allow the present arrangement to continue for a period of five yearsI.e. upto 1992 inclusive. For admission beginning from 1993 there would be only onepattern. All Universities and institutions shall take timely steps to bring about such amendments as may be necessary to bring statutes, regulations, and rules obtaining in their respective institutions in accord with this direction before the end of 1991 so that there may be no scope for raising of any dispute in regard to the matter.The uniform pattern has to be implemented for 1993. It is proper that one uniform system is brought into vogue throughout the co…

This research is being shared with us by a diligent reader on how deep the Media connections go. Puts the entire media bias in perspective. "1. Hindustan Times – Shobhna Bhartia, owner and editor-in-chief of Hindustan Times is a Congress MP from Rajya Sabha. 2. Vinod Sharma, HT Political Affairs editor, is essentially a Congress spokesman on all TV panel discussions, because once his boss’ term gets over, he will be looking out for her RS seat next 3. Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi, famous Congress stooges (and intermediaries for UPA allies) who were exposed in the Radiagate scandal, and are virtual Congress spokespersons in their capacities as electronic media personalities, are the ones who write opinion and op-ed columns most frequently (once every week) on the editorial pages of HT. In return, Barkha and Sanghvi are rewarded with Padma Shris and other monetary compensation by the Nehru dynasty or Congress party. 4. NDTV’s promoters are Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy. Radhika’s sister …

Here are the highlights of the survey: We received many votes in the survey, from various medical colleges of all states, ranging from batches 2000 to 2006.Received votes for more than seven PG Coaching Institutes from across the country including Bhatia, DAMS, IAMS, Speed PG Institute, MIMS Calicut, MEDPGTHRISSUR and others.Many students were in favour that rigorous self-study is important if NEET happens, and coaching is useful only with self-study.How the result is calculated?We have calculated the results by counting votes from only unique IPs to remove bias from multiple votes casting.An effective score is calculated institute-wise from the total votes submitted. This is to remove any bias occurred due to difference in number of votes for each institute.The effective scores are then compared under 4 broad ca…