May 16, 2008

Jews across Israel and United States of America stood up against the zionist lobby when they rejected 60 years of Israel’s existence as nothing more than apartheid and injustice to Palestinians. It sent a strong message to the Lobby that injustice will no longer be tolerated in the name of Judaism.

While Israel provided a home for Jewish refugees after the Holocaust, some from our own families, the terrible fact is that over 700,000 Palestinians were made into refugees to make room for the future state of Israel. Sixty years and several generations later, that number has swelled to an estimated seven million. Many live in 58 registered refugee camps dispersed throughout the Middle East, still denied their rights under international law.
That is why the creation of the state of Israel is known as the Nakba, or the Catastrophe, to Palestinians. Today the Palestinian Nakba continues. Inside of the 1948 borders of Israel, Palestinian citizens are denied legal rights received by Jews. Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem are denied access to land, water, health care, and other basic resources. Palestinians throughout historic Palestine experience international isolation, economic devastation aided by the erection of a 730-kilometer wall, and continued closures and invasions including the current horrific siege of Gaza.

And that is why many of us are refusing to celebrate: as long as Palestinians are still fighting for their fundamental human rights, we cannot rejoice.
Any peaceful future depends on recognizing both the Palestinian and the Israeli narrative. And yet, just as the names of over 400 pre-1948 Palestinian towns and cities have been deliberately erased from maps, the history of the Palestinian Nakba itself has been all but erased from Jewish consciousness

As Jews, we are members of a community that has repeatedly suffered exile and ethnic cleansing. We refuse to remain silent while this oppression is perpetuated upon another people in our name. To this end, we will continue to work within Jewish community and also in solidarity with Palestinian community, as we seek a self-determination for Jews that does not depend on the displacement and oppression of another people.

May 14, 2008

The Israeli Holocaust Against Arab Children

THE WORLD MUST KNOW!

Researched and created by Michael Hoffman

Last revision: April 5, 2002

Israeli Child Killers: Documentary Proof

Murdering Children for Sport

“Ali Murad Abu Shaweesh was 12 when Israeli soldiers shot him in the back. Ali was killed on the same day in June, 2001 that Sharon refused to let the Israeli foreign minister, Shimon Peres, meet with Yasir Arafat, yet his death also went unnoticed by American television news. But not entirely unnoticed, since the Israeli soldiers, who taunted the Palestinian boys over loudspeakers outside the Khan Yunis refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, goading them to come out and throw rocks, did so under the gaze of Chris Hedges, a reporter for the New York Times.

“Children have been shot in other conflicts I have covered–death squads gunned them down in El Salvador and Guatemala, mothers with infants were lined up and massacred in Algeria, and Serb snipers put children in their sights…in Sarajevo–but I have never before watched soldiers entice children like mice into a trap and murder them for sport,” Hedges wrote. His account, coolly factual yet full of passionate intensity, was written not for his own paper but for Harper’s Magazine, which sent Hedges to Gaza on his vacation.” The Nation, March 11, 2002

Israelis Kill 13 Year Old Boy

Little Ahmed Ghanem bids a final farewell to the remains of his big brother, Mahmoud, 13, in the village of Sara in the West Bank. Mahmoud was shot in the head March 10, 2002 by Israeli troops, west of Nablus.

Israelis Murder Palestinian Family: Mother and three children

The body of Mohammad Abu Kweik, 8, is lifted from the carnage after the Mitsubishi pick-up truck he was travelling in was bombed by Israeli forces in the West Bank Palestinian ghetto of Ramallah, March 4, 2002. Six Palestinian civilians, including the boy’s mother, Bushra Kweik, 38, and two sisters, Bara, 14, and Aziza, 16, were killed when Israeli troops bombed their truck after their mother had picked them up from school. The car behind them was also hit. The man the Israelis were attempting to assassinate was not in either vehicle. Two Palestinian children, ages 4 and 16, were killed in the second vehicle.

Also on March 4, Israeli troops opened fire on an ambulance in the Jenin refugee camp and killed a doctor, 57 year old Khalil Suleiman. Three medics and a nine year old girl were wounded in the Israeli army attack.

Commenting on the preceding Israeli army “raids” of March 4, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon stated: “Anyone wishing to conduct negotiations with Palestinians must first hit them hard…We must inflict heavy losses on their side.” Source: Los Angeles Times, March 5, 2002

Curator’s note: The Kweik family name is also spelled “Quaiek” in some reports

Israelis Murder 12 year old boy

The body of Mohammed Houmeduk, 12, shot and killed in cold blood Dec. 18, 2001 in the Khan Younis refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, by Israeli soldiers.

Israelis Murder Two Palestinian Boys: a 2 year old and a 13 Year Old

Hebron, Dec. 10, 2001. Editor’s note: We have no post-mortem photo of the two year old victim, Burhan Sidir. The Israelis blew him apart. His head was found in the street. His legs were in different places.

The photo above is of the other victim, 13 year old Shadi Arafi killed by Israeli forces. Two brothers, aged 8 and 10 were also seriously injured in the Dec. 10 Israeli attack.

Zahra Sidir said her son Burhan’s third birthday was to be March 27. “Can you think of a crime uglier than this?” she asked. “A targeted person? My two year old son?”

On Nov. 22, 2001, five Palestinian school boys ages 7 to 14 were on their way to classes in the Gaza strip when they were killed by a bomb planted by Israeli forces

Palestinian children hold photos of three of the five school boys murdered by the Israelis

Palestinian children bid farewell to their deceased playmates, killed by a booby-trapped bomb planted on the path to their school by the child-killing Israeli army

Israel “….places explosive charges where children are likely to pass and then claims that only the other side practices terrorism?” –Gideon Levy,”On The Way To School,” Ha’aretz, Nov. 26, 2001

Also cf. NY Times, Dec. 11, 2001, p. A12

The sister of 13-year-old Mohammed Abu Libda, who was shot to death by Israeli troops, cries during his funeral as her brother’s body is brought home in southern Gaza, September 9, 2001.

Israelis Murder 11 Year Old Palestinian Boy

The remains of Mohammed Zurub (above). Zionist occupation troops shot dead the 11-year old Palestinian boy in the Gaza ghetto on August, 23, 2001. Haaretz newspaper reported: “Witnesses said that Mohammed Zurub was shot in the heart after throwing stones at IDF (Israeli) troops.”

Israelis Murder 8 Year Old Palestinian Girl

Israelis Murder Two Palestinian Brothers

Two Palestinian brothers, Bilal Abu Khader, 8, and Ashraf Abu Khader, 5, were killed in the West Bank town of Nablus, July 31, 2001 by Israeli helicopter gunships, which rocketed the center of a Palestinian population center in the middle of the day. Six other Palestinians were killed during the Jewish-sponsored assassinations.

Israeli Settlers Murder Three Month Old Palestinian Baby

The body of murdered 3-month-old Palestinian infant Diya Tmaizi, center, is flanked by murdered Palestinian civilians Mohammed Hilmy Tmaizi, 20, right, and Mohammed Salameh Tmaizi, 22, left, in the West Bank village of Idna, near Hebron. The Palestinian baby and the other civilians were shot and killed, and at least four other Palestinian civilians were injured late Thursday, July 19, 2001, near Idna. According to Israeli radio, a Jewish “settler” group took responsibility for the murders.

Israeli Army Opens Fire on Children’s Playground

Ibrahim Al-Mugrabi weeps over his 11-year-old son, Khalil Ibrahim, who was slain in the Rafah section of the Gaza ghetto after the Israeli army strafed the boy’s playground with machine gun fire.

Khalil Ibrahim al-Mugrabi, 11, was shot in the head and killed July 7, 2001 near Rafah in the Gaza ghetto. Two other Arab children playing with him were wounded, one seriously, after the Israeli army sprayed machine gun fire at a crowd of Arab children.

The children were gunned down by Israeli soldiers from a Jewish guard tower as they were playing. Doctors said the dead Palestinian boy was shot in the head and that a 10-year-old boy was seriously wounded with a gun shot to the stomach. A third Palestinian boy, age 12, was injured less seriously.

Mohammed Abu-Shikadem, 29, who was nearby when the shootings took place, said that a group of some 30 children were playing near the refugee camp when he heard a burst of machine gun fire from the Israeli guard tower. “Two of the children fell in front of my eyes,” Abu-Shikadem said.

Israelis Kill Baby Girl and School-Teacher, Wound Ten other Children in Refugee Camp

One Israeli cannon shell hit the shack of the Hijo family in the refugee camp, instantly killing 4-month-old Iman Hijo, with shrapnel tearing a hole into the infant’s back. The girl’s 19-year-old mother, as well as three brothers and sisters, were wounded, including 18-month-old Mahmoud Hijo, was in intensive care at Nasser Hospital with shrapnel wounds, doctors said.

The slain infant’s uncle, Wael Hijo, carried the girl’s body from the hospital’s autopsy room to the X-ray department. In the emergency room, Iman’s 7-year-old aunt, Dunya, sat on a bed with a dazed look on her face, her frilly white-and-green dress pulled up above scraped and bandaged legs. “They killed the baby,” Dunya said, then burst into tears.

Israeli troops also fired on the refugee camp’s Khaldieh School in the West Bank, killing a Palestinian school-teacher.

Palestinian boy, 12, killed in Khan Yunis

A 12-year old Palestinian, Muhind Nizar Muharb, was killed April 23 in Khan Yunis refugee camp, in the Gaza Strip, when Israeli soldiers opened fire on Palestinian demonstrators at the funeral of a slain Palestinian. At least ten other Palestinians were injured. (Source: Ha’aretz, April 24, 2001)

Israeli army targets Palestinian children in grenade attack on playground

Palestinian child, wounded in Israeli army grenade attack on his schoolyard, is carried to an ambulance

“In the Old City of Hebron, (March 15, 2001), Israeli soldiers lobbed a stun grenade into a schoolyard during an elementary students’ demonstration. The students were throwing stones at Israeli cars, Israeli officials said. Six students suffered moderate or light wounds, including burns, broken bones and blisters, Palestinian officials said. The Israelis said five Palestinian children had experienced ‘light impact injuries from the grenade.’

“The army sees the removal of children from the circle of violence as extremely important,” an Israeli army statement said. The army will “continue to act against anyone trying to compromise the security of Israeli citizens,” it said.

Source: N.Y. Times, March 16, 2001, p. A-10

“Six Palestinian children suffered burns on Thursday (March 15, 2001) when Israeli soldiers threw a stun grenade into a West Bank schoolyard in new violence after an Israeli pledge to ease its blockade on Palestinians. Doctors in Hebron said three of the six children sustained burns to the head, hands and back and the other three were suffering from blisters and shock.

“Why did they throw the grenade into the yard? This is only a provocation,’ said teacher Mohammed Hawaismah as parents carried children out of the school and into ambulances.

May 13, 2008

by Nicholas Kollerstrom, PhD

As surprising as it may sound, the only intentional mass extermination program in the concentration camps of WW2 was targeted at Germans. From April, 1945 five million Germans were rounded up after surrendering, and deliberately starved until well over one million had died, in French and American-run concentration camps[1]– an event soon erased from the history books. There was, in contrast, never a centrally-coordinated Nazi program of exterminating Jews in Germany. Lethal gas chambers did not function in German labour-camps, that’s just an illusion. The traditional Holocaust story has developed out of rumours, misunderstandings, and wartime propaganda. From stories pre-dating the Second World War to the Nuremberg Trials which gave official sanction to the notion, to subsequent trials, books and films, we have had it imprinted on our collective psyche. In most of Europe now, it is a thoughtcrime to believe what you have just read, punishable by imprisonment, so think carefully before deciding to read on.

The real experts on this subject are – in jail, so maybe you will put up with hearing my view instead? Europe needs, more than anything else, a truth and reconciliation forum to get to the bottom of these matters, and to try and exorcise the demonic hate-images. Ever more nations are passing laws that prohibit citizens from expressing doubt – Germany, France, Austria, Poland, Romania, Belgium, Switzerland, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Collectively, we need to work trough our despair, rage, and ideas of blame, to try and access the real historical record.

Cyanide at Auschwitz

Zyklon-B was used at Auschwitz, as an insecticide. It was vital in attempting to maintain hygiene that mattresses be deloused. Cyanide gas was adsorbed onto clay-type granules, designed to make the deadly gas as ‘safe’ as it could be. If you go to Auschwitz today, you can’t see any authentic gas chambers. You see stone huts, and experts have testified that they could not have been used to gas people, owing to problems in sealing them up (Zyklon-B released its cyanide gas rather slowly[2]).

In 1988 the scientific team of Fred Leuchter (a US execution-expert ‘Mr Death’ in gas-chamber technology) visited Poland, and concluded that the Auschwitz ‘gas chambers’ could not possibly have functioned in the alleged manner – i.e., they were not gas chambers[3]. In the following years, others would confirm the accuracy of his seminal, ‘Leuchter Report’. The German chemist Germar Rudolf, who worked at the Max Plank institute for Solid State Physics, is now in jail, because he likewise measured the high levels of the cyanide in the walls of the de-lousing chambers. It happens that this gas bonds permanently with iron, and iron is present in all the cement etc of stone walls. Whereas, he found none in the walls of what were supposed to be the ‘gas chambers’ which were mainly shower units. He thereby confirmed the work of Leuchter who likewise only found remains of the cyanide gas-insecticide in the delousing chambers.[4]

After Rudolf’s report was published in 1993, he lost his job and was prevented from completing his doctorate, then a few years later he was given a jail sentence. He is now in a high-security prison near Stuttgart, for the crime of not finding cyanide in the ‘gas chambers[5],’ echoing Leuchter’s cyanide residue investigations.[6] When a chemist is put in jail, for replicating the result of another – in Germany of all places, the nation which invented chemical procedure – then the farce cannot continue for much longer[7] (The gas chambers were conveniently located east of Germany behind the Iron Curtain to make them inaccessible to westerners, which helped the myth to flourish).

The Leuchter results were almost too good to be true, with a three orders of magnitude difference between the cyanide levels in the delousing chamber walls (about one part per thousand) and those in the washing chambers (aka ‘gas chambers’), around one part per million. They are not published in any peer-reviewed chemistry journal, for obvious reasons. The only way to hold a debate on this subject appears to be in a courtroom, while being prosecuted! It is hard to reach the calm condition necessary for replication of chemical measurements. Nonetheless people have replicated the fundamental result[8], and even folk with no interest in chemistry can appreciate the pretty blue colour on the outside of the de-lousing chamber (where the Ferro cyanide has seeped right through the wall) and its complete absence around the so-called ‘gas chambers.’ Let’s face it, the case is established: the cyanide poison was used where the German records state that it was used – for delousing mattresses, clothing etc – whereas it was not used where the US and UK (at Nuremberg) alleged.

Tourists, thirty million of them, have filed through ‘Krema 1’ at Auschwitz, with its piteous piles of shoes, etc of the dead. This was reconstructed after the war in 1946[9], a fact revealed 1992 by Dr. Franciszek Piper, the Senior Curator and Director of Archives of the Auschwitz State Museum. The historic remains from the camp are such things as shower-unit huts, a swimming pool and a morgue. There was a camp orchestra, and quite a collection of pictures from the camp art-classes,[10] although these cannot be shown in Germany or Poland, on account of laws prohibiting the doubting of the Holocaust. Anne Frank of ‘Diary’ fame came to the camp in 1944 with her father who was ill. He was put into the hospital there, and recovered, suggesting that he was decently looked after.[11]

The ‘gas chambers’ at Auschwitz had water pipes in their ceilings, indicating that they were designed as shower units. They generally lacked tight-seal doors, which would have been essential, even though these were easy to install – the Leuchter report cited the absence of such seals as one reason why the alleged ‘gas chambers’ would never have functioned.

The Arithmetic of Annihilation

The primary argument put forward by Professor Arthur Butz in his classic text, The Hoax of the 20th Century was demographic: the Jews of Europe were still there after the war and therefore had not been exterminated. They had generally moved eastwards, and once the Iron curtain came down in 1948 it became difficult to count them. Some two million emigrated from Europe, both to Palestine and America. Between 3 ½ and 4 million Jews had lived in all the lands controlled by Adolf Hitler[12], of which an upper limit of one million died in WW2: the figure of a million dead, ‘while possible, seems rather high to me’, concluded Butz[13],[14] – a figure to be contrasted with ten million Germans who died during and just after that war[15]. If somewhere around fifty million people died during WW2, that Jewish mortality comprised some 2% of this total: which is about the average for Europe, i.e. no great excess of Jews died in WW2. Almost half a million Jews dwelt in Germany around 1930 (around 1% of the population), and by 1939 many had emigrated, some 270,000 remaining[16].

The figure of six million dead is given in the ‘Holocaust’ section in Wikipedia, with three million having died in Poland. Its high ‘extermination’ figures are given in counties well to the East of Germany. East Europe was then the epicentre of world Jewry, and in the years around WWII a vast diaspora of Jews took place, mainly into what became the Soviet Union, but also Palestine and America. Poland had 10% of its total population Jewish in the 1930s and the Polish premier had ‘stated repeatedly that there were a million too many Jews in Poland’[17] –so the pressure on them to emigrate was not solely due to German policies. British rule in Palestine disintegrated in 1938, which meant that its strict immigration quotas ceased to apply. A very careful estimate of East Europe’s Jewish population ascertained that there were 2.6 million in Poland at the outbreak of the war – less than the total Polish ‘deaths’ given by Wikipedia. It put total worldwide mortality of Jews through WWII at 1 ¼ million, of which most was due to ‘Soviet barbarism’ rather than German labour-camps[18]. That seems quite comparable to the figure given above. Within the Nazi labour-camps, around four hundred and fifty thousand Jews died.[19]

Around 500,000 prisoners were registered in the labour-camps of Auschwitz in Poland, of which some 130,000 died[20]. Bodies were there disposed of by individual cremation, and the records for coke fuel consumption over the period February 1942 – October 1943 for the cremation ovens indicate that around five thousand bodies were then burnt. That accords with the number of registered, deceased inmates, viz those who had died from natural causes[21], who had to be cremated rather than buried because of the great typhoid epidemics. This demonstrates that no mass-incineration of bodies took place. Josef Kramer, a supervisor at the Auschwitz camp, gave a statement after the war which is recommended by Professor Butz as probably genuine: it had 350-500 deaths per week happening over May-November 1944, all from natural causes, a very high figure because sick prisoners were sent there, and the dead were all cremated. He believed the camp held up to 100,000 prisoners, mainly Poles and Prussians.[22]

The Final Solution – An Export Program

The ‘Final Solution’ of Adolf Hitler retained a single meaning right through WW2, central to the program of ‘National socialism,’ and signified the deportation of Jews, generally eastwards to Poland and Russia[23]. This program did not change at any point, e.g. the Wannsee conference of 1942,[24] to signify deliberate extermination. If that practice ever happened, it was not a centrally-directed policy and did not involve gas chambers: many tons of documentation of ‘third Reich’ policies remains, and no-one has been able to find therein any hint of such a meaning – of intentional genocide. The historical record fails to show any central decision to exterminate Jews by Nazi Germany.

The Gestapo and Zionists were collaborating in the late 30s because they had in this respect similar aims.[25] But, a German Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937 stated that: ‘In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world’.[26] International Jewish organisations twice declared war on Germany, in 1933 then again in 1939[27]. As the ‘final solution’ policy[28] was thwarted by the Allies, the camps became places of hard labour; then under the impact of Allied terror-bombing ravages of disease and famine took place.

No Documents!

At the Auschwitz trial held at Frankfurt in the mid-sixties, the court had to conclude that it lacked ‘almost all the means or evidence available in a normal murder trial’ including ‘the bodies of the victim, autopsy reports, expert reports on the cause of death, evidence as to the criminals, murder weapons, etc[29].’ Far from leading to doubt, this gave to the mythic gas chambers a metaphysical status, doubt of which was forbidden. ‘No documents have survived, perhaps none ever existed,’ concluded the Holocaust historian Léon Poliakov.[30]

‘In the case of the rush to impute to the Nazis a programme for the extermination of millions of people which has implausibly left no material traces, all the normal rules of historiography seem not only to have been suspended, but to have been violated over and over again. Historians routinely cite documents from secondary works like Raul Hilberg’s The Destruction of the European Jews (1961) or from printed collections of documents, such as Robert Wolfe’s Holocaust: The Documentary Evidence – but they never cite original documents.[31]

The nearest we have to primary-source documents concerning what went on within the camps, comes from the bulky, three-volume International Red Cross Report published in 1948. This and especially Volume III describes the couple of thousand regular, routine inspection-visits that its doctors made through the war years to the Polish labour-camps. Their report never hints at any gas-chamber, nor any mass-cremations. While maintaining a politically neutral position[32], it confirms that mortality in the camps was to a large extent caused by the allied terror-bombing.[33] Likewise Winston Churchill’s bulky, six-volume account of the War gives no allusion to the subject, especially volume Six, Triumph and Tragedy where one would expect to have some allusion if he believed it had happened.[34]

The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It sharply criticised the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and ordered that “camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps.” Furthermore, it ordered: “The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp commandants … The camp doctors are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as possible.” The directive stressed that “the Reichsfuhrer SS [Heinrich Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced.”[35]A further letter to all concentration camp commanders dated 20th January, 1943, reaffirmed that ‘every means must be used to lower the death rate.’ By September 1943 Auschwitz still had mortality peaking at 80/day, viewed as ‘catastrophic’ by the SS administration. Thus, from authentic documents concerning the need to reduce fatalities at the Auschwitz camp, the world has moved to a belief in genocide, with not a single authentic, supporting document[36]. The Auschwitz camp was set up as an industrial plant using the giant coalfields of Poland, and located at the confluence of rivers; it was essential to the war-effort – it would have made no sense to start exterminating its inmates.

The Hamburg judge Wilhelm Staeglich had been positioned near Auschwitz during the war and had on various occasions dropped into the camps around there. The conditions seemed fairly tolerable, he recalled, and certainly nothing resembling an extermination program existed. In particular, he had discerned no fear of mistreatment amongst the inmates. He published a testimony to this effect in 1973, and in return for his shocking news a German inquisition forced him to resign his job, stripped him of his doctoral degree, and banned his book. He was then subjected to police raids. His book, translated into English, is an essential text.[37]

German military radio messages were successfully decrypted at Bletchley Park using the ‘enigma’ codebreaker. Concerning the labour camps, over the period Spring 1942-February ’43, the following information was obtained: ‘The return from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death, but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.’[38] That seems clear enough – though no-one took any notice of it at Nuremberg.

No Photos!

Not only is there no trace of ‘Third Reich’ documentation[39] for what is alleged, but no photographs exist showing anything resembling such a group-gassing procedure. Do you believe that Jews both male and female stripped then marched into the gas chambers, then were hauled out in piles? If so, are you willing to believe that neither the very-thorough Germans nor the clever Jews wanted or were able to get a single picture of this ultimate horror? Go to Google and search – you’ll find rows of emaciated bodies, dead of typhus, will that do? I don’t think so.

US air-photographs taken in 1944 (released in 1978) when the ‘program’ was supposed to be in full swing do not show any huge crematoria burning corpses nor queues entering the ‘gas chambers: ‘The few air photos of Auschwitz-Birkenau known to date from the period of December 1943 to February 1945 show no signs of fuel depots, smoke from chimneys or open fires, burning pits or pyres. The photos were altered: Zyklon B input hatches, groups of inmates, and walls around crematoria were retouched onto the photo negatives … To this day there is no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at any location in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two….That the photos in western hands were altered in order to incriminate Germany, and were first published by the CIA, is also very significant indeed.’[40]

The Fabrication of Untruth

Let’s hear a couple of testimonies concerning the dreaded gas-chambers. An Austrian woman, Maria Van Herwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988, as she had been interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz. Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads. Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed, and she witnessed the death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings, or of any extermination program.[41] A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of “gas chambers” during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing stories only later.[42]

The Allied carpet-bombing destroyed the supply lines for the Camps, and so the death-toll mounted from famine and disease. Leaflets were dropped from the air, alleging that at Auschwitz a ‘final solution’/extermination of Jews policy was being conducted, using gas.[43]That was the genesis of the story, as those Allied-propaganda leaflets were believed. Greeted by the sight, of rows of famished Jews who had died of e.g. typhoid, it was not hard to see its confirmation. ‘Far from it being common knowledge in Germany that people were being gassed … the vast majority of Germans were horrified by the United Nations accusations and they protested that they had never heard of such acts until after the cessation of hostilities when they had begun listening to United Nations broadcasts …. Since the British Broadcasting Corporation had been broadcasting these accusations regularly for many months before the end of the war, those Germans who had “common knowledge” of the gassing before the war’s end most likely got this “knowledge” from the BBC!’[44] The gas-chamber legend was born in December 1941, when the German author Thomas Mann declared on the BBC that, in German hospitals, the severely wounded, the old and the feeble were culled with poison gas. This was the ‘first appearance of gas chambers in propaganda.’[45]

As to how the stories got going, here is a remark by Faurisson: ‘The Foreign Office saw the new rumors of the Second World War only as Jewish inventions, and many in American circles shared that conviction[46]. Edward Beneš, President of Czechoslovakia (in exile in London), announced in November 1942, after inquiry by his staff, that the Germans, contrary to what had been reported to him, were not exterminating the Jews. The American Jew, Felix Frankfurter, a Supreme Court judge, stated to Jan Karski on the subject: “I can’t believe you.” In August of 1943, Cordell Hull, Secretary of State, warned the U.S. ambassador in Moscow by telegram that in planning a joint Allied statement on “the German crimes in Poland“, it would be advisable to eliminate any mention of the gas chambers, since, as the British pointed out, there was “insufficient evidence” in the matter[47]

The Hoax of Nuremberg

A modern inquiry needs to start from the data-fabrication at Nuremberg by the US/UK, using systematic assassination and torture of witnesses. The Nuremberg trials started in 1946 with the image of six million dead as firmly established.[48]This did not emerge as a conclusion from the trials, but in its immensity it was presented to the tortured and/or beaten[49] Nazis as a fact, and would they confess their part in it? All the main defendants at Nuremberg insisted that prior to the trial they had not known of any mass murder of Jews: except that Rudolf Höss, the former Commandant of Auschwitz, signed on March 15, 1946, a document averring that he had overseen the slaughter of two and a half million Jews, and this was read out on 15th April at Nurnberg. That day signified the birth of Auschwitz’s horror-myth. Two weeks earlier, Höss had remarked:

Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could just as well have said it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.”[50]

Decades later, an account was published of how Höss had been tortured for three days and nights without sleep by a British army team in order to extract that statement.[51] In a letter to his wife, Höss apologised for his ‘confessions’ and explains that they had been extracted from him under torture[52]. The victorious Allies could not have their ‘truth’ come out at Nuremberg, without the assistance of torture. In 2001, Patricia Meehan discussed the network of secret “Direct Interrogation Centres” the British had set up in their occupational zone of Germany[53] – torture chambers, to prepare ‘evidence’ for the upcoming trials. A Zionist influence was noted at the Nuremberg trials,[54] not least concerning the figure of six million.[55]

Weighty books are in print as memorials to ‘the Holocaust’, but, let’s hear a sceptical view from Down Under:

“…Yet in the case of the Holocaust, the dearth of material evidence for the existence of large-scale extermination programme is not perceived as significant. It is assumed that the Nazis destroyed their vast death machinery so thoroughly as to preclude all possibility of post-war detection. It is not permissible to express doubts as to whether the Nazis could really have eliminated all material evidence so completely, including making the ashes of six million people vanish from the locations at which they must have been interred. To think such doubts is to engage in thought crime….

‘The reality, therefore, is that the bulk of the ‘evidence’ for the Holocaust derives from a corpus of documents that was expressly manufactured by the OSS and OCC in 1945-46 for the purpose of incriminating the leaders of the former German government at Nuremberg. The procedure went roughly along these lines: the Documentation Division in Paris created ‘copies’ (in English only), certified them as true, and sent them to the prosecution in Nuremberg, while the original documents (if they ever existed) were never seen or heard of again. German translations of the original English texts were then prepared and sent to the defense in Nuremberg, where they arrived as late as possible so that the defense had insufficient time to worry about such matters as their authenticity….

‘Starting in May 1945 with the alleged suicides of SS-General Hans-Adolf Prützmann, SS head Heinrich Himmler and SS-General Odilo Globocnik while in British captivity, there followed a bizarre string of murders of individuals associated with the Auschwitz concentration camp. (These were perpetrated by a Jewish hit squad known as the DIN.) As Joseph Bellinger, author of a new book on Himmler’s murder, points out, within six months or so of the war’s end practically any one who could have shed light on the Jewish policy of the Third Reich was murdered!’ This, it must be said, was extremely convenient for the prosecution at Nuremberg.[56]

At Nuremberg, the German war-generals as well as being tortured had their wives arrested, to dissuade them from making inappropriate remarks in court. They were kept in solitary confinement to prevent their comparing notes, as each was presented with the Great Untruth and asked to believe it. Finally, most of them were hanged, by a court which felt free to invent new laws, and to act as prosecutor, judge, lawyer and executioner: American justice!

Coming of the Truthseekers

In the post-war years, anyone claiming to have a personal memory of the German gas-chambers would be liable to have Paul Rassinier turn up on their doorstep. Having himself experience the hell of the Buchenwald camp he was far from being a fan of the Nazis; but, neither was he prepared to endure fabricated stories on the subject. He spent years travelling about Europe with his tape-recorder and questions, but always he found that the witnesses came out with ‘evasions or palpable lies,’ and his published report concluded:

With regard to the gas chambers, the almost endless procession of false witnesses and of falsified documents to which I have drawn the reader’s attention during this long study, proves, nevertheless, one thing: never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order – or in fact order – the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner.[57]

That bold conclusion (for which he was, naturally, jailed) kick-started the ‘revisionist’ movement! We may here note that the money which the FRG keeps paying out to ‘holocaust survivors’ does enormous damage here, in stimulating ‘memories’ and generating such averred cases.

Revisionist Pioneers: David Irving, Ernst Zündel, and Germar Rudolf

Robert Faurisson investigated the configuration of the alleged Auschwitz ‘gas chambers,’ then Zundel[58] got to hear of this. At a historic 1985 trial in Toronto, witnesses were grilled for the first time ever over the existence of the alleged ‘gas chambers,’ and it was found that no such testimony would stand up. Faurisson was an advisor to Zundel in this trial, and a subsequent one, and this duo just kept on winning the arguments. The prosecution could come up with no credible witnesses for a gas-chamber’s existence:

“… in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst Zündel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the existence and operation of the ‘Nazi gas chambers’. Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any witnesses who could properly speak about them. All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them testified before the court as to having seen one or having participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the ‘gas chambers’.

“Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented themselves as “living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz“, showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that inevitably they retorted: “How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been gassed also.“”[59] (Faurisson)

The study of history cannot exist without dissenting views, and who would want to read a history journal that did not allow this? One fails to understand why ‘revisionism’ should be reprehensible, and Jews especially should be relieved to discover that their ancestors were never subject to such a horror. Bestselling author David Irving, who has written over a dozen books on WWII, was recently jailed[60]. His definitive, 700- page blockbuster Hitler’s War gave no hint that the Fuhrer ever got to hear of a gas chamber, or gave any extermination command! Irving is known for the care with which he checks out his primary-source material. In 1991 his publisher, Macmillan, destroyed all their copies of his books. Irving has paid quite a price for the truth he discovered.

In November 1991 Fred Leuchter was about to speak at Chelsea Town Hall (invited by David Irving), when he was arrested onstage by the police at the request of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and deported back to the United States. So much for freedom of speech. When his trailblazing ‘Leuchter Report’ was first published in 1989, the House of Commons denounced it as ‘Nazi propaganda’ and a ‘fascist publication’ (on July 20th, with 100 MPs voting). Even the House of Commons, however, cannot alter the laws of chemistry: the durability of the ferrocyanide ion is now pivotal to the Holocaust debate!

We are not likely to get important insights unless the ‘thoughtcrime’ penalty is lifted from the German people, and they are allowed to review their own past. The definitive modern textbook, Dissecting the Holocaust has chapters by some twenty different authors over six hundred pages.[61] In 1995 the German Government demanded that all copies be confiscated and burnt![62] Edited by Germar Rudolf, it draws its inspiration from the pioneer labours of Ernst Zundel. While in Tennessee and publishing ‘revisionist’ material, he was seized by the police and thrown into solitary confinement in a Canadian jail[63]. After two years he was transferred to Germany, where his trial now progresses. He recently (October 2006) read to the court an open letter from the Iranian president to Germany’s chancellor – to the judge’s fury. The letter said, in effect, that Germany had been on its knees before Zion for fifty years and it was time to get up[64].

Here are conclusions which Professor Robert Faurisson (University of Lyon) has drawn::[65]

that there was neither an order, nor a plan, nor a budget for the alleged genocide of the Jews;

that ‘Wannsee’ was at best only a “silly story“;

that there existed no specialist’s report on the weapon of the crime concluding that ‘the building (whether intact, “reconstructed“, or in ruins) served as a homicidal gas chamber’;

that there is no autopsy that would allow us to conclude: ‘This is the corpse of a deportee killed by poison gas’[66]

that the confession of Rudolf Höß was no longer of any value (“Höß was always a very weak and confused witness”);

that their alleged witnesses had probably never seen gas chambers or gassings inasmuch as the best of them, the famous Rudolf Vrba, in 1985, had been obliged to admit before a Canadian judge and jury that in his famous book on the subject he had made use of “poetic licence” or “licentia poetarum”;

that the “Jewish soap” had never existed;

that the figure of four million victims at Auschwitz was only a fiction;

and that from 1942 to 1945, certainly at Auschwitz, but probably overall, more Jews were killed by so-called ‘natural’ causes [starvation, disease, sickness and overwork] than by ‘unnatural’ ones.

At the recent Tehran conference, Faurisson summed up his case more succinctly –

• They cannot invoke a single document proving the crime.
• They are unable to provide the least representation of the crime weapon.
• They do not possess any proof nor even any evidence.
• They cannot name a single truthful witness[67]

Forbidden Doubt and Fictional Horror

Doubt anything in our modern world, scoff at sacred texts, no-one will care – except that one kind of doubt is forbidden to you, which will land you in jail – in ten different nations! You can read the Hammer-horror account in, e.g., Auschwitz by Lawrence Rees (2005): every hour or so, a thousand naked Jews were marched (somehow) into a room with space for maybe one or two hundred, the doors are locked, then the Zyklon-B is poured down special chutes or holes in the ceiling (which did not exist in the war, they were added later), then after the screaming stops ‘powerful fans’ remove the poison gas. In your dreams, Mr Rees. There were no such powerful fans. But, then what? The mass of bodies will be mixed up with the Zyklon-B, and that is specifically designed to keep emitting the cyanide gas slowly. How is anyone supposed to shovel out this tortured mass of corpses mixed up with poison powder? Remember there are only ordinary-sized doors, mostly opening inwards. Its an unthinkable nightmare that could not possibly have worked, and would certainly have gassed any workers trying to operate it. It is the ‘safe’ design of this insecticide material, which would have prevented it from functioning in this deliriously-imagined manner.

No German government existed after the war, that was the ‘unconditional surrender’ which the Allies demanded. By losing both its senior military staff and government, Germany was in effect decapitated – necessary for the illusory version of events to be perpetrated. The verdicts of Nuremberg were made final and binding for the post-war FRG. Germany has since paid a hundred billion Deutschmarks to Israel by way of Holocaust-compensation – clearly, that needs to be refunded. Germany should take the advice of Iranian leader Ahmadinajad and stop paying it, because that funding provides undue motivation for holocaust ‘memories.’Germany is helping to maintain the holocaust legend,[68]by thus aiding the state of Israel.[69]

The United Nations has now established its annual Holocaust Remembrance Day on 27 January, as of 2006. On this anniversary, we all need to mull over the faking of history and the Greatest Lie Ever Told. As Perseus gazed at the Medusa only via a mirror, to avoid being petrified, to too we need calm reflection and the power of Truth to avoid our collective destruction.

END NOTES

[1] ‘Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and the French Army casually annihilated about one million men, most of them in the American camps,’ a part of the US-UK-Russia plan ‘to destroy Germany as a world power once and for all…’ James Bacque Other Losses London 1989 p.xix.

[12]Did Six Million Really die? (Richard Harwood, Historical Review Press, 1975: a 30-page monograph) pp.6, 28. An official German source of June 1940 put the figure at 3 ¼ million Jews ‘in all the territories now under German control’ (i.e. it excludes Russia). W. Staeglich, Auschwitz – a Judge Looks at the Evidence’ IHR 1986, p.29.

[22] There were a network of labour camps around the small town of Auchwitz and this figure would be their total population. The gas-chamber allegations centred on the Birkenau (Auchwitz II) camp. British-intelligence estimate of 20,000 population (ref. 37) must have been for just one camp. Kramer’s statement alluded to the gassing stories: ‘All I can say is that it is untrue from beginning to end.’ Butz (ref 12), p.265.

[23] In the German endlosung, ‘end’ signifies ‘goal’ and ‘aim’, at least as much as ‘final.’

[24] The minutes of the Wannsee Conference (Berlin, 20th January 1942) provide ‘unambiguous documentary evidence that no extermination program existed:’ Butz, p.212;. For its text, see Staeglich (ref 12), Appendix I.

[28] On June 17th 1942, Hitler remarked: ‘One could found a state of Israel in Madagascar,’ (Six Million, p.5) suggesting that the National-Socialist ‘final solution’ was then still viewed as feasible. Many ‘Zionists’ for whom Palestine was unfeasible looked at Madagascar.

[34] General Eisenhower may have alluded to the subject, in one paragraph: after the war he visited a ‘horror camp’ near Gotha, where he saw evidence of ‘Nazi brutality’. D. Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe, 1948, p.408.

[43] In the Anne Frank ‘Diary’, she gets to hear in October 1942 about Jews going to gas-chambers, solely via the ‘English radio: The Diary of Anne Frank, Pan 1989, pp.43, 130; Felderer (ref. 11), p.13.

[44]www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p261_Lindsey.html. The story appears in a 1944 War Refugee Board report German Extermination Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau, Washington, Executive office of the President, the WRB being ‘an instrument of the World Jewish congress:’ Butz p.66-7; Staglich p.93-8.

[46] “The whole propaganda which started about Auschwitz abroad was initiated by us with the help of our Polish comrades… It is no exaggeration when I say that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda, which was spread at that time all over the world, was written by ourselves in the camp….” Bruno Baum, communist’ (Dissecting, p.115).

[48] David Irving, Nuremberg the Last battle (1996): US judge Robert Jackson was initially advised of the ‘six million’ figure by influential Jews: ‘Chapter 4, The Origin of six Million.’

[49] ‘All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:’ 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.

[50] Höss spoke these words to Moritz von Schirmeister in a car on his way to Nurnberg on 1st April, 1946: www.rense.com/general68/Höss.htm. Faurisson states that Bernard Clarke, Höss’s chief torturer, was Jewish, but this is not in Butler’s book. Irving (ref 47), p.241.

[53] Patricia Meehan, A Strange Enemy People: Germans under the British 1945-50, 2001.

[54] According to The Jewish Chronicle, the World Jewish congress ‘had secured the holding of the Nuremberg trials at which it had provided expert advice and much valuable evidence’ (16.12.49): McLaughlin, Nuremberg and other war crime Trials, Historical Review Press, 1979, p.54.

[55] For Zionists occupying top positions at the Nuremberg trials, see Butz (ref 13) p.30.

[63] Zundel was charged for the crime of having promoted the pamphlet Did Six Million Really die? (ref 11) This brilliant pamphlet, banned in many nations, has sold in hundreds of thousands in various languages, and let us hope it will come to be studied by every schoolchild.

[66] US forensic pathologist Dr Charles Larsen performed autopsies in 1945 at Dachau and other German labour-camps. He is quoted as saying to a newpaper in 1980: ‘There never was a case of poison gas uncovered:’ www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=55. But, his biography Crime Doctor (J.D.McCallum, Canada 1979) has him saying that at Dachau ‘a relatively few of the inmates I personally examined were murdered in this manner,’ viz. by cyanide pellets: these were, he reckoned, ‘mercy killings’ only for psychotic prisoners, p.61.

[67] He found Butz’ book to be still the best one on the topic, with which one may agree. A Paris court found Faurisson guilty (February 2005) of the crime of Holocaust denial, for affirming on Iranian TV, ‘There was never a single execution gas chamber under the Germans.’ He presided over the Holocaust-re-evaluation conference at Tehran, December 2006. See his excellent lecture there given: http://www.ziopedia.org/content/view/2676/58/

April 16, 2008

Briefly, I will add a word or two about my old friend, Ben Freedman, I consider it an honor.I was initially introduced to him as a sort of, well you meet a fellow, but I’m not so sure about him -he may be a sort of a Trojan Horse. Well, I said, let me make up my own mind. In the years that have followed, I make up my own mind I spent many happy evenings with him and his wife, Rose, who is not with us anymore. When Ben was over twenty-five -and, as I say, he comes from a very distinguished Jewish family in New York. When Ben moved over into the areas of Christianity with Rose, it took a great deal of courage. “Guts,” is the name in the Marine Corps, for what it took. Ben has been ostracized by many of his friends for believing that this Country had objectives and ideals that did not appear in the minds of some of our alien citizens.

So, it is with great respect and honor, I say, this gentleman is a world scholar in the areas which he will touch upon. It is my great pleasure, as a member of this fine military organization, to present the honorable Benjamin Freedman, of New York.

Benjamin Freedman:

I am very honored to be here. I don’t know how to start to thank Col. Dall for making it possible for me to address you. But I hope that things work out so that you will feel grateful to him. And if you will try to make a little use of the information I can give you, you may be very helpful in saving this country from the fate which has befallen Great Britain and, maybe the Soviet Union (Czarist Russia). We are in a very serious state at the present time. I’ve just returned, within the last four weeks, from an extended trip in what is known as The Middle East. I am very friendly with the heads of the government, the rulers who know me for 25-30 years, who talk to me and treat me, as a brother. I stay with them at their homes, and we call each other by our first names.Now, all I can tell you is that what I am going to tell you may not make you feel any more comfortable. But the less comfortable you are after hearing me, the more chance you will exert whatever influence you can to save this country from a fate it doesn’t deserve. After the men I see here get to know their records, what they have done to pull us out of the ditch, once, maybe twice, I don’t think it’s fair to these men to see us now, dragged down into the sewer of history – which is where we are bound to go, if things deteriorate – that really is not the word, – if things degenerate at a more rapid pace than they have been degenerating the last ten or fifteen years.

Now, before I make this talk, I would like to call your attention to one thing. I am going to use a word, you hear the word, you read the word, and you use the word, Jew, as though it is something that could be weighed and felt, has a background. I’m going to use that word, although I never use it in my own personal affairs or in my private life. Now, I want to explain that Dr. Samuel Johnson wrote the first English Dictionary in 1797. That’s only a few years from 1800, which isn’t so very long ago! It consists of two thick volumes. And it has possibly every word that was then used in the English language. I have shown that to many important people in all walks of life, and they were amazed, because when I told them what I am going to tell you now, they didn’t believe me. So I acquired these two books – cost a little money. They’re first editions, rare!

In that book, in those two volumes, the first English dictionary ever published by Dr. Samuel Johnson, (about whom, many of you know) the word, Jew, does not appear! The word, Jew, does not appear! That word was coined, forced on you, stuffed down your throats by control of all the media by the people who are interested in leading you to slaughter. The word, Jew, did not appear. They say Shakespeare used it. They cite all the people who used it. It did not exist. I don’t want to go into that, now. I don’t want to give you a discourse in philology. We have something more important. But I am going to talk about that word, use it; but I want you to know that I never accepted it, and more than, let’s say, the people who refer to artificial silk. Well, artificial silk has certain handicaps. I imported it, when it first came out. It was made in Germany, and it was called artificial silk. And it had a repercussion. People didn’t like to buy something that was artificial anything. So the manufacturers got together and they awarded $25,000 as a prize to anyone who could get up a good word to use instead of the word artificial silk. That prize was won by somebody who coined the word, “rayon.” Today, people talk about rayon as though it existed from the beginning of the world, as though it always existed. “Rayon” is a modern word and the man who coined it was paid $25,000.

The word, “Jew,” was coined for a purpose by the people who got us into two wars, who laid a trap to get us into a third one, and who have practically taken over the control of the world, especially the control of this country according to Senator Fulbright and others. So it’s about time that you learned the basics and did something about it. I am certain that, unless something is done to change the thinking of the 200,000,000 U.S.A. Christians, that this country is headed for disaster! There are 200,000,000 Christians in this country who have been brain-washed, from morning to night, by radio, press, television, motion pictures, every media – the mass information has been used to deceive you into believing things that they knew were deliberate lies and part of their scheme to brainwash you. One of them is the word, Jew!

Now, in the Middle East, you know the situation. The United States has been supplying, since the end of World War II, 32 billion dollars of the taxpayer’s money. 95% of that 32 billion dollars was used by the Congress of the United States, after you paid that money into the Treasury, to make the United States the accomplice, the ally, of thieves and murderers; to aid and abet them to hold on to their stolen loot -territory that they acquired by invading Palestine and driving the indigenous population out of the country that they had inhabited for 2,000 years!

Now you were taught by the Christians; you are taught by your ministers, by your priests, (and Dr. Ellson, here, God bless him, knows how I’ve been fighting, and he did as much as he could, over the years, to make it possible for me to succeed) . . . You have been told that it is your Christian duty to help repatriate God’s Chosen People to their promised land. You have been told that by every media of mass information, including the pulpit, including every other means by which they can shape your thinking: “That it is your Christian duty to help repatriate God’s Chosen People to their promised land.”

Now, I’ll tell you what a lie that is! I can cite the sources here that I’ve consulted, maybe 234 official documents, maps, books, and other records, but the best is one that I found in the last few years, The Encyclopedia Britannica, the 1911 Edition, Volume 15, three pages, define the word “Khazar.” Three pages! Now, that book was published in 1911, in London, and it probably took twenty-five years (whoever compiled that information) to accumulate it. It’s the research of many people. Many of the sources of information are mentioned at the end of the article. But you will find that the Khazars were an Asian nation; they were a Mongoloid, Turko-Finn tribal nation in Asia. And they had so much trouble with the other nations there, who finally succeeded in driving them out of Asia, across the border, into what is known today as Russia, in the area of the Ukraine. They found, there, a lot of peaceful agricultural people, mostly Slavic, and they conquered them. They did the same thing then as they are still doing in the Middle East! They took them, for no reason at all, except the people weren’t trained to fight! They established there, the Khazar Kingdom.

Now, those three pages in that Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 15, the 1911 Edition tells you who they are, how war-like, how savage, how barbarian they are, and that they succeeded in sweeping across Europe to the gates of Paris, and to Finland. They controlled all Europe – these Mongols known as Khazars! They did that from maybe the fourth century to the ninth century. And they were the most brutal people. They enslaved these people and exacted tribute from them, while holding them under their control – practically all Europe. Until in the 8th century, a man by the name of Rurik. a Varengian, who came from across the water, from what is known today as Sweden, – he organized these people. They were living as people interested in agriculture. They didn’t want any politics, they didn’t want nations or governments. But he saw what they were subject to, this treatment by their Khazar conquerors. And he organized the principality of Rokh, which became the Russian Empire. He organized them, and started to drive these Khazars back. And he finally succeeded to where they came into Europe for the first time, in the area of the Ukraine, where they continued their Khazar Kingdom.

Now, they were Phallic Worshipers. Anyone who doesn’t know what Phallic worship means, I am not going to go into detail, but they were Phallic worshipers and they were so degenerate that when the king, their ruler, heard that there were such things as monotheistic forms of religious belief, (Christianity, Islam, Judaism) he sent for representatives of the three of them, and asked them to tell him the merits of their faith. And after listening to them, like a child would play “Eenie, Meenie, Minie, Mo” to pick out the one that they favored, he listened to the three of them, and said, “I’m going to become a Jew and adopt the religion known today as Judaism.”

So, he compelled his entire nation, (which at the time had a population of maybe 18 or 20 million people, and extended to the heart of Europe), they had to become members of that religious belief. He sent to two Talmudic centers in the Holy Land, and he brought up religious leaders, (whether you call them rabbis, or what, it makes no difference). And he compelled the 4,000 nobles (they had a feudal system) to adopt that faith and it became the official faith. They built thousands of schools and so-called temples, or places of worship. That is how the people of Eastern Europe became what we know today as Jews.

I have with me, now, a circular that I received in the mail last week, the March of Dimes put it out with the assistance of the Rockefeller Foundation, and they recite the whole thing; because they have found, in recent years, that the Khazars are carriers of a disease that no other people in the world have. Here’s the circular that they got out. It’s called, “Kasak Disease” (The Jewish Disease – Tay-Sachs). I have known about it for years. The New York News newspaper had a full page on it, called “The Jewish Disease.” They explained the whole thing, so I went into it, investigated it, and gave a little money to one or two clinics that were trying to do something about it. The Eastern Europeans, of Khazar ancestry, known as Jews, are carriers of this Kasak disease. When one Khazar marries another Khazar: (I don’t say so, Mt. Sinai Hospital, the Jewish Memorial Hospital, the Rockefeller Foundation, they’ve all done a lot of work on it. They published these figures and these statistics . . .) that one out of four children, when one Khazar marries another Khazar, or of that ancestry, that child can’t live beyond three years. And the death that that child suffers is too miserable to describe to you. Out of the others, two of them become carriers, and one is clear.

Now I have maintained, after listening for twenty-six years to every meeting of the United Nations… (I attend, and I sit there, and I hear these representatives of the so-called State of Israel, talk) . . . I’ve been saying for many years, before I even knew about this, – they must be crazy! How can they say those things before the representatives of 131 other nations? How can they say that? Have they no shame? But, I found out they are suffering from this disease.

So then, to sit there, and tell the world, officially, in the United Nations, that they are God’s Chosen People, and that it is the Christian’s duty to repatriate them to their homeland, when they know who they are –

Now, those are the people that again went on the war-path, and they are now up to their old tricks and have been, because after this Russian Empire expanded, they conquered the Khazar Kingdom, and incorporated the people and the territory in the Russian Empire, and the so-called Jews in Russia, who were then the orthodox Jews, we’ll call them, . . . Russia had become a Catholic country, under Vladimir the 3rd, in 986 . . . they couldn’t get together on anything. Now, what happened? They have been at war ever since. And after the 11th century, when they were conquered, they pledged that they would never accept that conquest, that they would keep on organizing and revolting to again declare their independence and set up their Khazar Kingdom. That was in the 11th century! They have been fighting the Czarist regime, ever since, and I don’t want to go into detail, but I can give you plenty on that subject, and no one can deny it, because I can give you chapter and verse of hundreds of books, maps that I’ve taken, had photostated, all over the world, in the public libraries and museums. Now, you have these people, organized, and all of a sudden, something developed. The last revolt that they started was in 1905. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, under the word, Bolshevism, one of the five rules for their revolt was: Never start until the armies of the country are engaged otherwise. And in 1905, when Russia was at war with Japan, in the Far East, they started their last revolt, – and they were slapped down, like every other one since the 11th century.

That’s where I come into the picture. – I wasn’t alive in the 11th century, though! But, what I am trying to tell you, though, is that in 1905 they took this terrible licking, like, here.

So, we had a President in Washington, Mr. Taft, Mr. Jacob Schiff, of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., the bankers in New York who are the arm in the United States of the Rothschild International world wide plutocracy – Mr. Schiff, with two young men, went down to see Mr. Taft, and he said, “Mr. Taft, . . . (I am not telling you this out of my memory. I almost know this by heart, because the books are here, in the Congressional Library. The people who were in the room with President Taft, at that time, and President Taft were told by Jacob H. Schiff) . . . “We want you to cancel the Most Favored Nation Treaty with Czarist Russia, and we want you to recall our Ambassador.” The President told them, “Mr. Schiff, things are not what you represent them to be. My ambassador tells me differently.” So, Mr. Schiff told him, in so many words, “Is you is, or is you ain’t – going to do it?” When the President said that he would not do it, Mr. Schiff said “We will put a political party and a president in Washington, to whom we can dictate what they should do.”

Jacob Schiff came back to New York (He was at that time head of The American Jewish Committee), and in my father’s home (I was a young man then), in the presence of many prominent men some of whom you’ve heard the names of, he retold the story and I looked at the books in the Public Library, Memoirs of men who were in the room at that time, names that are familiar to many people that are here. That is a -fact. Now, what happened?

They ganged up in New York, to get rid of Taft. I was a protégé of Mr. Bernard Baruch – a name that I think you are all familiar with. His father was a doctor, Dr. Simon Baruch, who had brought me into the world, and Bernard Baruch was a visitor at our home all the time. He courted my sister; one of my sisters. So the stage was set to get rid of the Republican Party and the Republican President and put in their own party and their own President. But it was very difficult, because, after the Cleveland depression (President Cleveland was a Democrat, we had Free Trade) we had the worst depression ever seen anywhere. And that swept the Republican Party into power, because they advocated tariff, protective tariff to protect the working man against the cheap labor of Europe and to protect the infant industries, in the United States against foreign competition.

Mr. Schiff went down there and had this conversation, came back to New York and the stage was set. And I, as a young man, got into the act. What I am telling you now, I saw with my own eyes, heard with my own ears, but I make it brief. The stage was set: “How can we get rid of the Republican Party; how can we get rid of Taft” – and Mr. Baruch was picked out as the leg man. He was a smart man!

They set up the National Democratic Headquarters at 200 Fifth Avenue, which was the site of the old Fifth Avenue Hotel, now an office building, and Mr. Henry Morgenthau, Sr., the old man, the father of the one you all know, was made chairman of the Finance Committee. I was made his confidential assistant in liaison with the Treasurer, who was Mr. Rollo Wells of St. Louis, – the Andrew Mellon of his time. And I was right in the middle! I saw everything that went on, because I handled all the books that had the cash contributions in them. Mr. Jacob Schiff and the Jews (use that word as I told you, with reservations) put up the money to launch this Party, and they looked around for a man to put up as President. To make a long story short, because the details aren’t very interesting, they got Woodrow Wilson, a rascal who wasn’t worth the powder to blow him to hell!

They got Woodrow Wilson, the man who had more ego than any man I have ever read about, they got him to head the Democratic Party. And they got into difficulties! Because the Democrats only got the Electoral votes in the South; where the people in agriculture wanted cheap goods from Europe. But the North wanted the Republicans. They found out they could not elect a President in the United States. So, I handled the money; I was the leg man, the errand boy (I was only a boy then.) They trotted Theodore Roosevelt out of the political “moth-balls” (He was then an editor of a magazine). They told him, “You are the indispensable man. You are the only man who can save the United States.” And with his ego they formed the “Bull Moose Party” and Mr. Jacob H. Schiff and the Jews throughout the world – they got plenty of money from England – they formed the Bull Moose Party. And in that way they split the Republican vote between Roosevelt and Taft, and Mr. Wilson walked in with a minority of the popular vote – the lowest man, (and I knew the inside of his private life, which I don’t want to go into here). But never was a lower rascal in the White House, and I’ve known plenty of them since that time!

Now, Mr. Wilson really didn’t know enough to come in out of the rain! I cannot understand how he ever got there, except that in shuffling the cards, they had the goods on him, You find in politics, every time they pick a candidate, and put him out in front, they have the goods on him. You know he had been sleeping with the wife of the professor who lived next door to him at Princeton, whose name was Peck. And they used to call Wilson, at Princeton, “Peck’s bad boy.” When she got a divorce and moved to Washington, she married a man who had a son. And that son borrowed $40,000 from the bank, without asking them. He didn’t know how to pay it back, and the pressure on him was getting very, very hot. So this woman heard of Samuel Untermeyer (of the big firm, Googenheim, Untermeyer and Marshall) a prominent Democrat; and supplied much money to the party. She went to him with a big package of letters which I read (Wilson was a great letter writer. He knew the language; there’s no doubt about it, Wilson knew his vocabulary, when it came to making love, anyway). So, they cooked this up and she got the idea of blackmailing him. She got Samuel Untermeyer to go to see him, as a lawyer. He was a big contributor to the Party and he knew Wilson, and he went there. To make a long story short, Wilson didn’t have the money; Untermeyer provided it, and the boy paid the money back.

Now, Mr. Untermeyer told President Wilson, “I’ll advance that money if you will do one favor for me. The next opening on the Supreme Court, I want to name the man.” He said, “We’ve never had a Jew on the Supreme Court I think there ought to be a Jew on the Supreme Court.” So Wilson said, ”It’s a deal!” and they paid the $40,000. When a vacancy appeared on the Supreme Court, Mr. Untermeyer recommended Mr. Brandeis. Mr. Brandeis was the number one Zionist in the United States; the head of them all, and he became very friendly with Wilson. And when the war with Germany broke out, the war between England, France, Russia, and Germany and Austria, the United States had nothing to do with it. They all thought England, France and Russia would crush Germany in 60 days. Big headlines in all the papers. I was very active then, in politics, “Boys home by Christmas, Boys out of the trenches by Christmas,” but when Christmas came, the war was getting hot!

The Germans had brought out the submarines, and the Irish gave them two bases on the coast of Ireland, and they were sinking everything that brought food and ammunition to England, which under International Law is correct. Now, when they saw that Great Britain was going to lose the war, the Jews were very much excited, because, up to that time, Germany was their best friend.

In 1822, Germany passed the Emancipation Edict which gave everybody in Germany equal rights; no religious discrimination. Up to that time, every country in Europe had quotas: l%, 2%, 3% to become a doctor, a dentist, a lawyer, a banker, a schoolteacher, anything. Germany, in 1822 passed that Emancipation Edict and all the Jews across Europe rushed to Germany, because they could get an education. They could become doctors, lawyers, dentists, druggists. So, when I was in Germany, 50% of the pupils in German schools were Jews from all over Europe. They all ran to Germany. And they worshiped the Germans

Baline, a Jew, was the head of the Hamburg-American, North German-Lloyd lines. Even the private bankers, the Hohenzollerns, were Jews. The head of the German General Electric Company was a Jew. The biggest companies, – there was no discrimination at all, in Germany. And the Jews had a picnic there, but they were not the Khazars! They were so-called Jews that came into Western Europe with the Roman armies; that came from Judea when the Romans occupied Western Europe, and there were two houses of worship, one in Speyer, one in Lyons, little stone houses, in the second century, which was 600 years before the Khazars were converted. So the German Jews were just as much apart as the Arabs and the Khazars, today, in fact, there was a saying, I don’t know if I can say it in this company, but when I lived in Germany, the Germans said about the Pollocks – (they called them “the Pollocks,” the Eastern European Jews), “Where a Pollock pisses, grass will never grow.” They hated them! They could never allow their children to marry. So, when Germany was winning the war, the Jews were very happy, because they didn’t want Russia to come out the winner, with France and England, because they thought it would be tougher for the Jews in Russia. So, they were all pro-German. What happened? When the Germans trotted out the submarines, – England in August or September, I don’t remember just which week, but General Haig, in London, warned the English, “We have less than two week’s food supply for the whole nation of 55,000,000 people.” The food and ammunition boats were sunk so quickly, they couldn’t get food or ammunition.

So, England was offered a Peace Treaty by Germany. They were offered a Peace Treaty twice! It was on the desk of the British War Cabinet, ready to be signed. It needed only one signature. What happened? The Khazar Jews in New York, Washington, led by Brandeis, made this promise through Fleischman & Sockloff in London. They went to the British War Cabinet and they said, “You don’t have to make peace – which is tantamount to surrender. We can show you how you can win the war, if, when you defeat Germany, and carve up the Ottoman Empire (or Turkey) you will give us Palestine. And they made that deal. It was all written. I don’t say so; Other people don’t say so. The Zionists, in the books that they have written, tell this whole story. How they got the promise of Palestine, by promising to use their influence to get U.S. into the war. That’s how they are going to turn against the United States; the same way they turned against Germany; after everything Germany did for them, since 1822. They made the deal to bring the United States into the war, which meant certain defeat for Germany; which was triumphant, then; offering a peace that was tantamount to surrender.

So, when that offer was made, the Zionists in London went to the British War Cabinet, according to their own books, their own record, in the British Museum. I circulated thousands of copies of this 12 page memorandum by the man who negotiated it. When they were bombing London in 1945, he thought he’d die. And he typed this out, this true story, and gave it to the British Museum for posterity. That’s available. Anyone can have a copy of it. I sent out thousands, – maybe ten thousands of them.

Now, the United States got into World War I. How did they get in? They didn’t know how to get us in, because the Germans leaned backwards. They said, “We are going to do nothing on land, on the sea, or in the air, to provoke or justify a declaration of war by the United States, because we’ll be licked! Now, we’ve won the war!” Which they had. The Russian armies were in retreat; in France, the army had revolted, and wouldn’t fight. There was no more fight left in the allies. So, what happened?

They went to Great Britain; made this offer; Great Britain accepted it. Then the question came, How to get U.S. into the war? They couldn’t get us in if the Germans didn’t give us provocation or justification. So, what did they do? A message was sent to Washington, that the S.S. Sussex, a ferry from Dover to Calais, had been torpedoed in the Channel and 38 Americans lost their lives! I’m not going to string this out, because I’ve got a lot of other things to tell you!

On the basis of the torpedoing, and the loss of 38 lives of our citizens, Congress declared war against Germany. Now, after the 4,000,000 men that General Pershing had been drilling, were on their way over, some of them fighting in Europe – (a lot of you, here, went over, were fighting while this fighting was going on) a member of Parliament and others, who couldn’t stand it any longer, they came out with the secret that the Sussex was not sunk and no Americans lives were lost. And we were in the war! Now that is how the Jews got us into World War I, and that started everything because Wilson was elected. We had a national debt of one billion dollars. And since then it has gone up – I think it’s now 465 billion, after the wars we’ve been having, so that’s how the Jews got us into World War I.

I knew Judge Samuel Rosen who was Mr. Roosevelt’s mentor. They used to say that he didn’t go to the water closet without consulting Judge Rosen. I was very friendly (here’s somebody who will bear me out) – Now, when it came to World War II, we couldn’t get into the war because the Germans said, “When the Americans came into World War I, look what happened to us!” So there was war in Europe again, Germany and European countries, and there was no way to get us into the war. And the pressure of the Jews here, in New York City, Washington, to get into that war was terrific! They didn’t know how to do it. So, as Mr. Tanzell wrote in his “Back Door to War,” (he was at Georgetown University, a professor of history) – I saw, in the Yale Library, the papers of the Secretary of Defense at that time – we were pushed into World War II by Mr. Roosevelt, through the back door! Germany would give us no justification or provocation. But the Jews, here, were putting pressure on Roosevelt, “We’ve got to get into that war! We can’t let him do that to us!”

We had to make up our minds what to do, so the United States sent to Japan, and they said, “We can’t sell you any more scrap steel or oil.” Japan was fighting a war with China; Without scrap steel or oil, which they got altogether from the United States, they would have to withdraw from the war. So they sent nine different Ambassador here, trying to change Mr. Roosevelt’s mind. Ile said, “No, we can’t sell you any more, at all.” So, at that time, Germany and Japan had a treaty; Any country that declared war on either one was instantly at war with both! So, Mr. Roosevelt figured, “We’ll provoke a war with Japan.” That’s why he threatened them to cut off steel and oil. So they sent nine ambassadors here, and, finally, they couldn’t take it much longer, so you know what happened at Pearl Harbor!

Now, Mr. Roosevelt figured, and it’s in Mr. Stimson’s diary, in his own handwriting, which is in the room at Yale Library containing all Mr. Henry L. Stimson’s papers – he was the Secretary of Defense. He wrote in his diary important things that went on (in his own handwriting) and under November 25th, two weeks before Pearl Harbor, he wrote, “The President sent for us to come to the White House. I thought it was to discuss the war in Europe, but he told us that we had to be at war with Japan but he didn’t want it to look as if we fired the first shot!” That is almost verbatim. Henry Stimson, the Secretary of Defense wrote that in his diary. That is how we got into the World War, because Roosevelt said, “We want to be at war with Japan, but we don’t want it to look as though we fired the first shot”! So we got the first shot, alright, at Pearl Harbor! But, the only way we could be at war with Germany was to be at war with Japan. Then automatically, under their treaty, we were at war with Germany. That’s how we got into World War II.

We are now on our way to World War III. The chances are it will be a nuclear war. There is that chance, and I’ve been fighting, (some time and money) so that the conditions would not be set for that. Now, what happened. The Chairman of Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr. Fulbright, stated on Sunday morning television program, which according to the advertising services has 28 million listeners; he said, in answer to a question about the Middle East, he said, “You cannot do anything about the Middle East!” He said, “The Senate is controlled by the Jews; 90% of them have subverted the United States Senate, and you cannot do anything” – or words to that affect.

Now, the Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the United States, throws in the sponge, says that 90% of the Senate are controlled by the Jews, meaning the Zionists. So, you may now expect the worst! The only way it can be averted, if it can be avoided, is to alert yourself to these facts. All these lies that you’ve been told, “That it’s your Christian duty to help repatriate “God’s Chosen People” to their “Promised Land,” is a lot of hog wash. And we are going to be in another war unless you people and others like you wake up the 200,000,000 Christians in this country who have been so brainwashed that they don’t know whether they are coming or going! They are running around in circles All you hear is “Jesus was a Jew!” I’ve told you now that the word didn’t exist when Dr. Johnson wrote the dictionary, and I’ve done all the research on it. It never existed! And then, again, there is the Father here, who will bear witness. Pontius Pilate wrote on the crucifix on which our Lord and Savior was to be crucified, “Jesu Nasarenus Rex Iudoreum” which, translated, anybody that has had one year of Latin, knows that means “Jesus, the Nazarene, the Leader of the Judeans.” “Leader of the Judeans,” the genitive plural and “Rex” comes from “Rego” – “To lead.”

“Now, they were trying to “frame” our Lord and Savior, claiming that he was influencing the people not to pay taxes so that gold couldn’t be shipped to Caesar. And that constituted rebellion. That’s why the trial was held, and that’s why Pontius Pilate put that up on the crucifix, “Leader of the Judeans” who were revolting against Rome. Now we all know everyone of you heard, hundreds of times, that at this trial, Jesus said, “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and unto God that which is God’s.” He was not advising the people to withhold taxes paid to Rome. So, you see, you, as representatives, and high representatives of the 200,000,000 Christians in the United States, have got to learn the facts.

As I was talking, here, to one of your erudite members, it’s alright to be interested in baseball and basketball and football and golf, cross-word puzzles – I don’t know how many hundreds of millions of hours a year was wasted by women doing crossword puzzles! It satisfies their ego to say, “Oh, Minnie, I got all but two words, yesterday!” And they compete with one another. They spend hours, buy dictionaries, and they don’t know the first thing about the correct facts of existence. Now, we didn’t ask to come into the world; neither did our children, but we owe them a debt. We owe a debt to these men who sacrificed their lives to save this country, so let’s see what we can do.

April 15, 2008

Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times. The Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., speech was given before a patriotic, Christian audience (NOT before Nazis as some have suggested) in 1961 on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense.

Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman’s essential message to us — his warning to the West — is more urgent than ever before.

———————————————————-

Transcript of Freedman’s Speech

Ladies and gentlemen, you are about to hear a very frightening speech. This
speech is an explanation of the plans now being laid to throw the United
States into a third world war. It was made a short time ago before a large
group in the Congressional `Room of the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C.
Both the speech and the question and answer period later so electrified the
audience that a group of patriots has transferred it to two long-playing
records to play for friends, clubs, and your church group in your community.
The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted authority on Zionism and all
of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is a former Jew, and I mean a FORMER Jew.
He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and nail, and stands
today as a leading American patriot. We now take you to the speaker’s
platform to present Benjamin Freedman.
(applause)
[Freedman’s speech]
What I intend to tell you tonight is something that you have never been able
to learn from any other source, and what I tell you now concerns not only
you, but your children and the survival of this country and Christianity. I’m
not here just to dish up a few facts to send up your blood pressure, but I’m
here to tell you things that will help you preserve what you consider the
most sacred things in the world: the liberty, and the freedom, and the right
to live as Christians, where you have a little dignity, and a little right to
pursue the things that your conscience tells you are the right things, as
Christians.
Now, first of all, I’d like to tell you that on August 25th 1960 — that was
shortly before elections — Senator Kennedy, who is now the President of the
United States, went to New York, and delivered an address to the Zionist
Organization of America. In that address, to reduce it to its briefest form,
he stated that he would use the armed forces of the United States to preserve
the existence of the regime set up in Palestine by the Zionists who are now
in occupation of that area.
In other words, Christian boys are going to be yanked out of their homes,
away from their families, and sent abroad to fight in Palestine against the
Christian and Moslem Arabs who merely want to return to their homes. And
these Christian boys are going to be asked to shoot to kill these innocent
[Arab Palestinians] people who only want to follow out fifteen resolutions
passed by the United Nations in the last twelve years calling upon the
Zionists to allow these people to return to their homes.
Now, when United States troops appear in the Middle East to fight with the
Zionists as their allies to prevent the return of these people who were evicted
from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists who were
transplanted there from Eastern Europe… when that happens, the United
States will trigger World War III.
You say, when will that take place? The answer is, as soon as the difficulty
between France and Algeria has been settled, that will take place. As soon as
France and Algeria have been settled, that will take place. As soon as France
and Algeria have settled their difficulty, and the Arab world, or the Moslem
world, has no more war on their hands with France, they are going to move
these people back into their homes, and when they do that and President
kennedy sends your sons to fight over there to help the crooks hold on to
what they stole from innocent men, women and children, we will trigger
World War III; and when that starts you can be sure we cannot emerge from
that war a victor. We are going to lose that war because there is not one
nation in the world that will let one of their sons fight with us for such a
cause.
I know and speak to these ambassadors in Washington and the United
Nations — and of the ninety-nine nations there, I’ve consulted with maybe
seventy of them –and when we go to war in Palestine to help the thieves
retain possession of what they have stolen from these innocent people we’re
not going to have a man there to fight with us as our ally.
And who will these people have supporting them, you ask. Well, four days
after President Kennedy — or he was then Senator Kennedy — made that
statement on August 28, 1960, the Arab nations called a meeting in Lebanon
and there they decided to resurrect, or reactivate, the government of
Palestine, which has been dormant more or less, since the 1948 armed
insurrection by the Zionists.
Not only that… they ordered the creation of the Palestine Army, and they are
now drilling maybe a half a million soldiers in that area of the world to lead
these people back to theirhomeland. With them, they have as their allies all
the nations of what is termed the Bandung Conference Group. That includes
the Soviet Union and every Soviet Union satellite. It includes Red China; it
includes every independent country in Asia and Africa; or eighty percent of
the world’s total population. Eighty percent of the world’s population. Four
out of five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war
with us. And not alone are they four out of five human beings now on the
face of this earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the world and
they are the non-Caucasians… the non-white nations of the world, and that’s
what we face.
And what is the reason ? The reason is that here in the United States, the
Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government.
For many reasons too many and too complex to go into here at this — time
I’ll be glad to answer questions, however, to support that statement — the
Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were
the absolute monarchs of this country.
Now, you say, ‘well, that’s a very broad statement to make’, but let me show
what happened while you were — I don’t want to wear that out — let me
show what happened while WE were all asleep. I’m including myself with
you. We were all asleep. What happened ?
World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and
fourteen was the year in which World War One broke out. There are few
people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one
side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany,
Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened ?
Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally,
but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the
world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain
stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week’s
food supply facing her — and after that, starvation.
At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower
of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army
was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn’t
want to play war anymore, they didn’t like the Czar. And the Italian army
had collapsed.
Now Germany — not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an
enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was
Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated
peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let’s
call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”
Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously !
They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that
Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and
being totally defeated.
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the
Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and — I am
going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to
prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn’t believe
what I’m saying is at all possible — the Zionists in London went to the
British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war.
You don’t have to give up. You don’t have to accept the negotiated peace
offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States
will come in as your ally.”
The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were
young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We
will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight
with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the
war.”
In other words, they made this deal: ” We will get the United States into this
war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won
the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.”
Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the
United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason
whatsoever. It’s absolutely absurd that Great Britain — that never had any
connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine —
should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the
United States into the war.
However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. October, nineteen
hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that — I don’t know how many here
remember it — the United States, which was almost totally pro-German —
totally pro-German — because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews,
the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country
were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in
the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany
lick the Czar.
The Jews didn’t like the Czar, and they didn’t want Russia to win this war. So
the German bankers — the German-Jews — Kuhn Loeb and the other big
banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to
the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: &”As long as
France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent ! ” But they poured
money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to
lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine,
they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything
changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the
newspapers had been all pro-German, where they’d been telling the people
of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain
commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no
good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross
nurses. They were cutting off babies’ hands. And they were no good.
Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice
Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson. We’re getting from England
what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President
Wilson and get the United States into the war.” And that did happen. That’s
how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we
had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead
of in this room.
Now the war — World War One — in which the United States participated
had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there — we were
railroaded into it — if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into — that war
merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is
something that the people in the United States have never been told. They
never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened ?
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said:
“Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let’s have something in
writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us
Palestine after you win the war.” Because they didn’t know whether the war
would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a
receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very
cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn’t know what it was all
about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.
the Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the
Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United
States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much
about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don’t think I could make it
more emphatic than that.
Now, that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war.
The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it’s history. You
know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went
to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there,
as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was
there: I ought to know. Now what happened ?
The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and
parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part
of European territory, the Jews said, ?How about Palestine for us?? And
they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this
Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, ?Oh, that
was the game! That’s why the United States came into the war.? And the
Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this
terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted
Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost.
Now, that brings us up to another very interesting point. When the Germans
realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never
been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany.
You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in
industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr.
Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd’s
and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the
banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg,
who were the big merchant bankers — the biggest in the world. The Jews
were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now, the
Germans felt: ?Well, that was quite a sellout.?
It was a sellout that I can best compare — suppose the United States was at
war today with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the
Soviet Union: “Well, let’s quit. We offer you peace terms. Let’s forget the
whole thing.” And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of
the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat.
A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man’s imagination
cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in
this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were
loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and
that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us.
How would we feel, in the United States against Chinese ? I don’t think that
one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn’t be
lampposts enough, convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would
feel.
Well, that’s how the Germans felt towards these Jews. “We’ve been so nice
to them”; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia
failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to
Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very
nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other
than they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.”
Now, Nahum Sokolow — all the great leaders, the big names that you read
about in connection with Zionism today — they, in 1919, 1920, ’21, ’22, and
’23, they wrote in all their papers — and the press was filled with their
statements — that “the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact
that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intercession
and bringing the United States into the war against them.”
The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn’t that the Germans in 1919
discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or
Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment
against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all
political. It was economic. It was anything but religious.
Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the
shades and said ?Shema’ Yisrael? or ?Our Father.? No one cared in
Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that
developed later in Germany was due to one thing: that the Germans held the
Jews responsible for their crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because
World War One was started against Germany for no reason for which they
[Germans] were responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being
successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade.
You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the
French Revolution, what was the German Reich consisted of 300 — three
hundred ! — small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three
hundred little separate political entities. And between that time, between the
period of… between Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into
one state. And within 50 years after that time they became one of the world’s
great powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain’s, they were doing
business all over the world, they could undersell anybody and make better
products. And what happened? What happened as a result of that ?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that: “We
must slap down Germany”, because there isn’t one historian in the world that
can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany
off the map politically. Now, what happened after that ?
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they
naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not
a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access
to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and
quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a
Jew who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called
camps of political prisoners. And he wrote back that he found them in very
fine condition.
They were in excellent shape; everybody treated well. And they were filled
with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened
to be maybe 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there
were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, Masons, and others
who had international affiliations.
Now, the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn’t want the
world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the
Germans resented that.
So they did take appropriate action against them [against the Jews]. They. . .
shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could ? They shunned
them. The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics,
or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought
about our defeat.
Now, after a while, the Jews of the world didn’t know what to do, so they
called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world
attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany: ?You fire Hitler! And you
put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist,
no matter what he was. You can’t treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the
world, are calling upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you.? Well, the
Germans told them… you can imagine. So what did they [the Jews] do?
They broke up, and Samuel Untermyer, if the name means anything to
people here… (You want to ask a question? — Uh, there were no
Communists in Germany at that time, they were called ‘Social Democrats.)
Well, I don’t want to go by what they were called. We’re now using English
words, and what they were called in Germany is not very material. . . but
they were Communists, because in 1917, the Communists took over
Germany for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht, and a
group of Jews in Germany took over the government for three days. In fact,
when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland because he thought the
Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia, and that
he was going to meet the same fate that the Czar did in Russia. So he left and
went to Holland for safety and for security.
Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it
was quiet, the Jews were working, still trying to get back into their former —
their status — and the Germans fought them in every way they could, without
hurting a hair on anyone’s head. The same as one group, the Prohibitionists,
fought the people who were interested in liquor, and they didn’t fight one
another with pistols, they did it every way they could.
Well, that’s the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that
time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans and there were only
460,000 Jews. . . less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews.
And yet, they controlled all of the press, they controlled most of the
economy, because they had come in and with cheap money — you know the
way the Mark was devalued — they bought up practically everything.
Well, in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World
Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up and Mr. Untermeyer came
back to the United States — who was the head of the American delegation
and the president of the whole conference — and he went from the steamer to
ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he
said:
“The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are
now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to
starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against
them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export
business.”
And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany’s food supply had to be imported,
and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their
labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany’s population
would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one
third of the population.
Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page — a whole
page — in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer
boldly stated that: “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense.
President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the NRA” . [National Recovery
Administration] — which some of you may remember, where everybody was
to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal,
which of course was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that
time.
Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and
it was so effective that you couldn’t find one thing in any store anywhere in
the world with the words “made in Germany” on it.
In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to
dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that
their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked
“made in Germany,” they were picketed with signs: “Hitler”, “murderer”,
and so forth, and like — something like these sit-ins that are taking place in
the South.
R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen
to be Jews. . . a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz,
marked “made in Germany”. Well, they were cotton stockings. They may
have been there 20 years, because since I’ve been observing women’s legs in
the last twenty years, I haven’t seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So
Macy ! I saw Macy boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with
signs saying “MURDERS” and “HITLERITES”, and so forth.
Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in
Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no
murder, there was nothing.
Now, that… naturally, the Germans said, “Why, who are these people to
declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and our
industries come to a standstill ? Who are they to do that to us?” They
naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by
Jews.
Why should a German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who was
part of a boycott who was going to starve Germany into surrender into the
Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor
was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
That continued for some time, and it wasn’t until 1938, when a young Jew
from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot one of the
officials [a German official] that the Germans really started to get rough with
the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and
having street fights and so forth.
Now, for anyone to say that — I don’t like to use the word ‘anti-Semitism’
because it’s meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I’ll have to
use it — the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews
was that they were responsible: number one, for World War One; number
two, for this world-wide boycott, and number three — did I say for World
War One, they were responsible? For the boycott — and also for World War
II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for
the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to
survive.
In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had
decided [that] Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in
between. It’s going to be Christian or it’s going to be Communist. And the
Germans decided: “We’re going to keep it Christian if possible”. And they
started to re-arm.
And there intention was — by that time the United States had recognized the
Soviet Union, which they did in November, 1933 — the Soviet Union was
becoming very powerful, and Germany realized: “Well, our turn is going to
come soon, unless we are strong.” The same as we in this country are saying
today, “Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.”
And our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars of your money for
defense, they say.Defense against whom ? Defense against 40,000 little Jews
in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over
control of many other governments of the world.
Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from
which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my
imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons.
A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. One million
tons of TNT is a megaton. Now, our nuclear bombs have a capacity of 10
megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT. That was when they were first
developed five or six years ago. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being
developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many
megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
So, what do we face now ? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a
nuclear war, humanity is finished. And why will it take place ? It will take
place because Act III… the curtain goes up on Act III. Act I was World War
I. Act II was World War II. Act III is going to be World War III.
The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are
determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them
permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government.
Now, that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I read
it, but many here have read it, and it’s known all over the world.
Now, what are we going to do ? The life you save may be your son’s. Your
boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you you don’t know it any
more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with
the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it
at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren’t
permitted to know it.
Who knew it ? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other ‘s
knew it. Did I know it ? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was
liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President
Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there.
I was ‘confidential man’ to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the
Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the
treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the
table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson’s brain
the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and also
indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement.
Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers
on this hand, and President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when
it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. And that’s
how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys
over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as
their “commonwealth.” They’ve fooled you so much that you don’t know
whether you’re coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, “Gentlemen, any witness that
you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony.” That is
correct. I don’t know from what state you come, but in New York state that
is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness said one lie, disregard his
testimony.
Now, what are the facts about the Jews ?
The Jews — I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don’t
call them Jews. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they
are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn’t a Jew in the world today, and if those
people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I
can prove that.
Now what happened ? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of
the world’s population of those people who call themselves Jews, were
originally Khazars.
They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were
so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe
— and to reduce this so you don’t get too confused about the history of
Eastern Europe — they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square
miles. Only, there was no Russia, there were no other countries, and the
Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe — so big and so
powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars
would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That’s how big and powerful they were.
Now, they were phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don’t want to go into
the details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion of
many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king
became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to
adopt a so-called monotheistic faith – either Christianity, Islam — the moslem
faith — or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By
spinning a top, and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out socalled
Judaism. And that became the state religion.
And he sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and
brought up thousands of these rabbis with their teachings, and opened up
synagogues and schools in his kingdom of 800,000 people — 800,000
thousand square miles — and maybe ten to twenty million people; and they
became what we call Jews. There wasn’t one of them that had an ancestor
that ever put a toe in the Holy Land, not only in Old Testament history, but
back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And yet they come to the
Christians and they ask us to support their armed insurrection in Palestine by
saying:
“Well, you want to certainly help repatriate God’s chosen people to their
Promised Land, their ancestral homeland, It’s your Christian duty. We gave
you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on
Sunday, and kneel and you worship a Jew, and we’re Jews.”
Well, they were pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the
Irish [were converted]. And it’s just as ridiculous to call them “people of the
Holy Land,” as it would be… there are 54 million Chinese Moslems. Fifty
four million ! And, Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., so in that time, 54
million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief.
Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, where the city of
Mecca is located, where Mohammed was born… imagine if the 54 million
Chinese called themselves ‘Arabs’. Imagine ! Why, you’d say they’re lunatics.
Any man that believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be
crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith; a belief that had its origin
in Mecca, in Arabia.
The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped
them in the ocean and imported from the Holy Land a new crop of
inhabitants that were Christians. That were christians of flesh and blood.
They weren’t different people. They were the same people, but they had
accepted Christianity as a religious faith.
Now, these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns… they were a
Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They
likewise, because their king took the faith — Talmudic faith — they had no
choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to
be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So everybody — they lived
on the land just like the trees and the bushes; a human being belonged to the
land under their feudal system — so they [Khazars] all became what we call
today, Jews !
Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians… for the great Christian
countries of the world to say, “We’re going to use our power, our prestige to
help repatriate God’s chosen people to their ancestral homeland, their
Promised Land.”
Now, could there be a bigger lie than that ? Could there be a bigger lie than
that ?
And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the
television, the book publishing business, they have the ministers in the
pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same language
… so naturally you’d believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You
wouldn’t call black black anymore — you’d start to call black white. And
nobody could blame you.
Now, that is one of the great lies… that is the foundation of all the misery
that has befallen the world. Because after two wars fought in Europe —
World War I and World War II — if it wasn’t possible for them to live in
peace and harmony with the people in Europe, like their brethren are living
in the United States, what were the two wars fought for ? Did they have to —
like you flush the toilet — because they couldn’t get along, did they have to
say, “Well, we’re going back to our homeland and you Christians can help
us” ?
I can’t understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that
dumb because every theologian, every history teacher, knew the things that
I’m telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money,
stuffed their mouths with money, and now… I don’t care whether you know
all this or not. It doesn’t make any difference to me whether you know all
these facts or not, but it does make a difference to me. I’ve got, in my family,
boys that will have to be in the next war, and I don’t want them to go and
fight and die… like they died in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they’ve
died all over the world. For what ?
To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had
been in peaceful possession of that land, those farms, those homes for
hundreds and maybe thousands of years ? Is that why the United States must
go to war ? Because the Democratic Party wants New York State — the
electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral vote ? And Pennsylvania, the electoral
vote ?… which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists ?… the
balance of power ?
In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all
Zionists and their co-religionists. And New York State went for Kennedy by
400,000 votes. Now, I don’t blame Mr. Kennedy. I’m fond of Mr. Kennedy. I
think he’s a great man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we
get the facts to him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his
appointments indicate he knows. He’s playing with the enemy. Like when
you go fishing, you’ve got to play with the fish. Let ’em out and pull ’em in.
Let ’em out and pull ’em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy’s father, and how
well informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to his
father, I don’t think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.
But I do think that it is the duty of every mother, every loyal Christian ,
every person that regards the defense of this country as a sacred right, that
they communicate — not with their congressman, not with their senator, but
with President Kennedy. And tell him, “I do not think you should send my
boy, or our boys, wearing the uniform of the United States of America, and
under the flag that you see here, our red, white and blue, to fight there to
help keep in the hands of these that which they have stolen”. I think
everyone should not alone write once, but keep writing and get your friends
to write.
Now, I could go on endlessly, and tell you these things to support what I
have just asked you to do. But I don’t think it’s necessary to do that. You’re
above the average group in intelligence and I don’t think it’s necessary to
impress this any more.
But… I want to tell you one more thing. You talk about… “Oh, the Jews.
Why the Jews ? Christianity. Why, we got Christianity from the Jews and
the Jews gave us Jesus, and the Jews gave us our religion”. But do you know
that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that
day… and I was one of them ! This is not hearsay. I’m not here to be a
rabble-rouser. I’m here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first
prayer that you recite, you stand — and it’s the only prayer for which you
stand — and you repeat three times a short prayer. The Kol Nidre. In that
prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow,
or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months — any oath, vow
or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months shall be null and
void.
The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall
not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and so on.
And further than that, the Talmud teaches: “Don’t forget — whenever you
take an oath, vow, and pledge — remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you
recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that”.
How much can you depend on their loyalty ? You can depend upon their
loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
And we’re going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the
same reason. You can’t depend upon something as insecure as the leadership
that is not obliged to respect an oath, vow or pledge. Now I could go on and
recite many other things to you, but I would have a little respect for your
time, and you want to really, uh, get through with all of this. Tomorrow’s
going to be a long day.
Now I want to say one thing. You ask me… well, you think to yourself: “well
how did this fellow get mixed up in this the way he got mixed up in it.”
Well, I opened my mouth in 1945, and I took big pages in newspapers and
tried to tell the American people what I’m telling you. And one newspaper
after another refused the advertisement. And when I couldn’t find a
newspaper to take them — I paid cash, not credit — what happened ? My
lawyer told me, “There’s an editor over in Jersey with a paper who will take
your announcement”. So, I was brought together with Mr. McGinley, and
that’s how I met him.
So somebody told me the lawyer who introduced me, who was the son of the
Dean of the Methodist Bishop, he said: “Well, I think he’s a little anti-
Semitic. I don’t know whether I can get him over here. So he brought him
over to my apartment and we hit it off wonderfully, and have since then.
Now, I say this, and I say it without any qualifications. I say it without any
reservations. And I say it without any hesitation. . . if it wasn’t for the work
that Mr. Conley McGinley did with “Common Sense” — he’s been sending
out from 1,800,000 to 2,000,000 every year — if it wasn’t for the work he’s
been doing sending those out for fifteen years now, we would already be a
communist country. Nobody has done what he did to light fires. Many of the
other active persons in this fight learned all about if for the first time through
“Common Sense”.
Now, I have been very active in helping him all I could. I’m not as flush as I
was. I cannot go on spending the money… I’m not going to take up a
collection. Don’t worry. I see five people getting up to leave. (laughter)
I haven’t got the money that I used to spend. I used to print a quarter of a
million of them out of my own pocket and send them out. Mr. McGinley,
when I first met him, had maybe 5,000 printed and circulated them locally.
So I said, “With what you know and what I know, we can really do a good
job”. So I started printing in outside shops of big newspaper companies, a
quarter of a million, and paid for them. Well, there’s always a bottom to the
barrel. I suppose we’ve all reached that at times.
I’m not so poor that I can’t live without working and that’s what worries the
Anti-Defamation League. I can just get by without going and asking for a
job or getting on the bread line. But Mr. McGinley is working. He’s sick and
he’s going at this stronger than ever. And all I want to say is that they want
to close up “Common Sense” more than any other single thing in the whole
world, as a death-blow to the fight Christians are making to survive.
So I just want to tell you this. All they do is circulate rumors: “Mr. Benjamin
H. Freedman is the wealthy backer of ‘Common Sense’.” The reason they do
that is to discourage the people in the United States: don’t send any money to
Common Sense. They don’t need it. The’ve got the wealthy Mr. Freedman as
a backer. That all has strategy. They don’t want to advertise me so that
people that have real estate or securities to sell will come and call on me.
They just want people to lay off “Common Sense”. And all I’m telling you is,
I do try to help him, but I haven’t been able to. And I will be very honest.
One thing I won’t do is lie. In the last year I’ve had so much sickness in my
family that I could not give him one dollar.
How he’s managed to survive, I don’t know. God alone knows. And he must
be in God’s care because how he’s pulled through his sickness and with his
financial troubles, I don’t know. But that press is working… and every two
weeks about a hundred or a hundred-fifty-thousand of “Common Sense” go
out with a new message. And if that information could be multiplied… if
people that now get it could buy ten or twenty five, or fifty, give them
around. Plow that field. Sow those seeds, you don’t know which will take
root, but for God’s sake, this is our last chance.
[Freedman then discusses the importance of people forgoing unnecessary
purchases to ‘buy more stuff’, play golf, etc., and use the money to keep
“Common Sense” going. He explains that the paper is going in debt; could
be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent
some $2,400,000 in his attempt to bring the information to the American
public and elected officials. He then asks for questions from the audience.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
{Question inaudible]
Freedman: All right, I’ll comment on that. This is rather deep, but you all
have a very high degree of intelligence, so I’m going to make an attempt. In
the time of Bible history, there was a geographic area known as Judea. Judea
was a province of the Roman Empire. Now, a person who lived in Judea was
known as a Judean, and in Latin it was Judaeus; in Greek it was Judaius.
Those are the two words, in Greek and Latin, for a Judean.
Now, in Latin and Greek there is no such letter as ‘j’, and the first syllable of
Judaeus and Judaius starts ‘ghu’. Now, when the Bible was written, it was
first written in Greek, Latin, Panantic, Syriac, Aramaic… all those languages.
Never Was the word Jew in any of them because the word didn’t exist. Judea
was the country, and the people were Judeans, and Jesus was referred to only
as a Judean. I’ve seen those early… the earliest scripts available.
In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time
to translate the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible
because who the Devil could read ? It was only the educated church people
who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages.
Anyhow, Wycliffe translated the Bible into English. And he did. But in it, he
had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius.
There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence.
There was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten that. So in the first
translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as ‘gyu’, “jew”. At the
time, there was no printing press.
Now, between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that
word passed through so many changes… I have them all here. If you want I
can read them to you. I will. That word ‘gyu’ which was in the Wycliffe
Bible became. . . first it was ‘ gyu ‘, then ‘ giu ‘, then ‘ iu ‘ (because the ‘ i ‘ in
Latin is pronounced like the ‘ j ‘. Julius Caesar is ‘ Iul ‘ because there is no ‘j’
in Latin) then ‘ iuw ‘, then ‘ ieuu ‘, then ‘ ieuy ‘, then ‘ iwe ‘, then ‘ iow ‘, then ‘
iewe ‘, all in Bibles as time went on. Then ‘ ieue ‘, then ‘ iue ‘, then ‘ ive ‘, and
then ‘ ivw ‘, and finally in the 18th century… ‘ jew ‘. Jew.
All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now,
there was no such thing as ‘Jew’, and any theologian — I’ve lectured in maybe
20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country, and two in
Europe — there was no such word as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus
was a Judean and the first English use of a word in an English bible to
describe him was ‘gyu’ — Jew. A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus,
just the same as we call a laboratory a ‘lab’, and gasoline ‘gas’… a tendency to
short up. [A few words are missing here]
But [a few words are missing here] in England there were no public schools;
people didn’t know how to read; it looked like a scrambled alphabet so they
made a short word out of it. Now for a theologian to say that you can’t harm
the Jews, is just ridiculous. I’d like to know where in the scriptures it says
that. I’d like to know the text.
Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as
a citizen of the United States, do to people who did to you what the so-called
Jews — the Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers — they weren’t Jews, as I just
explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who’d been converted to
Talmudism. There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given
in recent years to this religion known in Bible history as Torah [inaudible].
No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism. It didn’t exist. They
pulled it out of the air… a meaningless word.
Just like ‘anti-Semitic’. The Arab is a Semite. And the Christians talk about
people who don’t like Jews as anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-
Semites. The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn’t one Jew
who’s a Semite. They’re all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern european
Jews. So, they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this
reverend who told you these things, I’ll convince him and it’ll be one step in
the right direction. I’ll go wherever I have to go to meet him.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, ma’am. Well… I can answer that. First of all, your first premise is
wrong. Your first premise that all the Jews are loyal to each other is wrong.
Because, the Eastern European Jews outnumber all the rest by so many that
they create the impression that they are the Jewish ‘race’; that they are the
Jewish nation; that they are the Jewish people. . . and the Christians swallow
it like a cream puff.
But in 1844 the German rabbis called a conference of rabbis from all over
the world for the purpose of abolishing the Kol Nidre from the Day of
Atonement religious ceremony. In Brunswick, Germany, where that
conference was held in 1844, there was almost a terrific riot. A civil war.
The Eastern Europeans said, “What the hell. We should give up Kol Nidre ?
That gives us our grip on our people. We give them a franchise so they can
tell the Christians, ‘Go to hell. We’ll make any deal you want’, but they don’t
have to carry it out. That gives us our grip on our people”. So, they’re not so
united, and if you knew the feeling that exists.
Now, I’ll also show you from an official document by the man responsible
for. . . uh, who baptized this race. Here is a paper that we obtained from the
archives of the Zionist organization in New York City, and in it is the
manuscript by Sir James A. Malcolm, who — on behalf of the British
Cabinet — negotiated the deal with these Zionists.
And in here he says that all the jews in England were against it. The Jews
who had been there for years, the [inaudible – probably Sephardim], those
who had Portuguese and Spanish ad Dutch ancestry… who were monotheists
and believed in that religious belief. That was while the Eastern European
Jews were still running around in the heart of Asia and then came into
Europe. But they had no more to do with them than. . . can we talk about a
Christian ‘race’ ? or a Christian religion ?… or are the Christians united ?
So the same disunity is among the Jews. And I’ll show you in this same
document that when they went to France to try and get the French
government to back that Zionist venture, there was only one Jew in France
who was for it. That was Rothschild, and they did it because they were
interested in the oil and the Suez Canal.
————————————————
[Question inaudible] Freedman: You know why ? Because if they don’t,
they’re decked up. They come around and they tell you how much you must
give, and if you don’t . . . oh, you’re anti-Semitic. Then none of their friends
will have anything to do with them, and they start a smear campaign… and
you have got to give.
In New York city, in the garment center, there are twelve manufacturers in
the building. And when the drive is on to sell Israel Bonds, the United
Jewish Drive, they put a big scoreboard with the names of the firms and
opposite them, as you make the amount they put you down for, they put a
gold star after the name. Then, the buyers are told, “When you come into
that building to call on someone and they haven’t got a gold star, tell them
that you won’t buy from them until they have the gold star”. BLACKMAIL.
I don’t know what else you can call it.
Then what do they do ? They tell you it’s for ‘humanitarian purposes’ and
they send maybe $8 billion dollars to Israel, tax exempt, tax deductible. So if
they hadn’t sent that eight billion dollars to Israel, seven billion of it would
have gone into the U.S. Treasury as income tax. So what happens ? That
seven billion dollars deficit — that air pocket — the gullible Christians have
to make up.
They put a bigger tax on gas or bread or corporation tax. Somebody has to
pay the housekeeping expenses for the government. So why do you let these
people send their money over there to buy guns to drive people out of their
ancient homeland ? And you say, “Oh, well. The poor Jews. They have no
place to go and they’ve been persecuted all their lives”. They’ve never been
persecuted for their religion. And I wish I had two rows of Rabbis here to
challenge me. Never once, in all of history, have they been persecuted for
their religion.
Do you know why the Jews were driven out of England ? King Edward the
First in 1285 drove them out, and they never came back until the Cromwell
Revolution which was financed by the Rothschilds. For four-hundred years
there wasn’t a Jew. But do you know why they were driven out ? Because in
the Christian faith and the Moslem faith it’s a sin to charge ‘rent’ for the use
of money. In other words – what we call interest [usury] is a sin.
So the Jews had a monopoly in England and they charged so much interest,
and when the Lords and Dukes couldn’t pay, they [Jews] foreclosed. And
they were creating so much trouble that the king of England finally made
himself their partner, because when they they came to foreclose, some of
these dukes bumped off the Jews. . . the money-lenders. So the king finally
said — and this is all in history, look up Tianson [Tennyson?] or Rourke, the
History of the Jews in England; two books you can find in your library.
When the king found out what the trouble was all about, and how much
money they were making, he declared himself a fifty-percent partner of the
money lenders. Edward the First. And for many years, one-third of the
revenues of the British Treasury came from the fifty-percent interest in
money-lending by the Jews.
But it got worse and worse. So much worse that when the Lords and Dukes
kept killing the money-lenders, the King then said, “I declare myself the heir
of all the money-lenders. If they’re killed you have to pay me, because I’m
his sole heir”. That made so much trouble, because the King had to go out
and collect the money with an army, so he told the Jews “get the hell out of
here”. There were 15,000 of them, and they had to get out, and they went
across to Ireland, and that’s how Ireland got to be part of the United
Kingdom.
When King Edward found out what they were doing, he decided to take
Ireland for himself before someone else did. He sent Robert Southgard with
a mercenary army and conquered Ireland. So, show me one time where a
Jew was persecuted in any country because of his religion. It has never
happened. It’s always their impact on the political, social, or economic
customs and traditions of the community in which they settle.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible] Freedman: Yes, sir. Well, they say most of those things
themselves. It was unnecessary for Benjamin Franklin to say it. Most of
those things they say themselves. But Benjamin Franklin observed, and by
hearsay understood, what was happening in Europe.
When Russia, in 920 was formed, and gradually surrounded the Khazar
Kingdom, and absorbed them, most of the well-to-do Khazars fled to
Western Europe and brought with them the very things to which you object
and I object and a lot of other people object. The customs, the habits, the
instincts with which they were endowed.
Now, when Benjamin Franklin referred to them as Jews because that’s the
name that they went by. Thats the name that they took. And the Christians,
when they first heard that these people who were fleeing from Russia — who
they were — that they had practiced this Talmudic faith — the Christians in
Western Europe said, “They must be the remnants of the lost ten tribes!”
And Mr. Grutz, the greatest historian amongst the Jews, said that — and he’s
probably as good an authority on that subject as there is. So when Ben
Franklin came to Europe in the 18th century, he already saw the results of
what these people had done after they left their homeland. And every word
of it is true… they themselves say it. I can give you half a dozen books
they’ve written in which they say the same thing: When they have money
they become tyrants. And when they become defeated, they become ruthless.
They’re only barbarians. They’re the descendants of Asiatic Mongols and
they will do anything to accomplish their purpose.
What right did they have to take over Russia the way they did ? The Czar
had abdicated nine or ten months before that. There was no need for them. . .
they were going to have a constitutional monarchy. But they didn’t want that.
When the constitutional monarchy was to assemble in November, they
mowed them all down and established the Soviet Union.
There was no need for that. But they thought, “Now is the time”, and if you
you will look in the Encyclopedia Britannica under the word ‘Bolshevism’,
you’ll find the five laws there that Lenin put down for a successful
revolution. One of them is, “Wait for the right time, and then give them
everything you’ve got”. It would pay you to read that.
You’d also find that Mr. Harold Blacktree, who wrote the article for the
Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Jews conceived and created and
cultivated the Communist movement. And that their energy made them the
spearhead of the movement. Harold Blacktree wrote it and no one knew
more about Communism than he. And the Encyclopedia Britannica for 25
years has been printing it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[Question inaudible] Freedman: Well, I can’t advocate that you do anything
that’s criminal, but I can tell you this. You can start what I call an endless
chain. If you can get your friends to write, objectively, here is the statement:
Mr. Kennedy’s office gave me this himself. Mr. Smith, who succeeded Mr.
Kennedy, took over his office — was in his office — and gave me this. He
delivered this on the 25th, and it says here:
“For release to AM (that means morning papers), August 25th”. “Israel is
here to stay. It is a national commitment, special obligation of the
Democratic Party. The White House must take the lead. American
intervention. We will act promptly and decisively against any nation in the
Middle East which attacks its neighbor. I propose that we make clear to both
Israel and the Arab states our guarantee that we will act with whatever force
and speed are necessary to halt any aggression by any nation”.
Well, do you call the return of people to their homeland [the Arab
Palestinians] aggression ? Is Mr. Kennedy going to do that ? Suppose three
million Mexicans came into Texas and drove the six million Texans into the
deserts of Arizona and New Mexico. Suppose these Mexicans were slipped
in there armed — the Texans were disarmed — and one night they drove them
all out of Texas and declared themselves the Republic of the Alamo. What
would the United States say ?
Would we say it’s aggression for these Texans to try to get their homes back
from the Mexican thieves ? Suppose the Negroes in Alabama were secretly
armed by the Soviets and overnight they rose up and drove all the whites
into the swamps of Mississippi and Georgia and Florida. . . drove them out
completely, and declared themselves the Republic of Ham, or the Republic
of something-or-other. Would we call it aggression if these people, the
whites of Alabama, tried to go back to their homes ?
Would we. . . what would we think if the soviet Union said, “No, those
Negroes now occupy them ! Leave them there!”, or “No, those Mexicans are
in Texas. they declared themselves a sovereign state. Leave them there. You
have plenty of room in Utah and Nevada. Settle somewhere else”.
Would we call it aggression if the Alabama whites or the Texans wanted to
go back to their homes ? So now, you’ve got to write to President Kennedy
and say, “We do not consider it aggression in the sense that you use the
word, if these people want to return to their homes as the United Nations —
fifteen times in the last twelve years — called upon the Zionists in occupation
of Palestine to allow the Arab Palestinians to return to their former homes
and farms”.
[End of transcript of Benjamin Freedman speech, given in 1961 at the
Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic
newspaper of that time, Common Sense.]