we know there are many other forms of addiction, like food addiction (bulimia, obesity, anorexia, whatever), gambling addiction, and so no. But the thought I have is this: Why is addiction viewed as something bad? Take life for example, waking up, wouldn't being addicted to waking up alive in the morning be considered a "good" thing? Then is addiction good? Or is it bad? Somebody addicted to adrenaline, and the risks that particular activity may bring, or somebody addicted to just something like video gaming, which implies a sedentary lifestyle which is a health hazard too.

Seems like everything is hazardous, a risk. And yet everybody works, to survive, so that they can be happy/comfortable in some way. But isn't ALL comfort just the nervous system being chemically satisfied?

Why are drugs looked at as this incredibly "special" area of life? Why is smoking, drinking, or eating something to make you satisfied, considered essentially different from jumping from an airplane with a parachute, playing a game of chess, running a marathon, or doing whatever, going into the desert all alone to "find God" or whatever. Which is just basically isolating the nervous system from constant social bombardment/programming.

So lawful civilization is just a way of regulating the ways in which people get high. Some get high on power, some sex, some games, some get high on taking care of a family and feeling "existentially meaningful" in that way, becuase they think time is real and future generations are intrinsically meaningful.

Then others use drugs, but they are mostly punished with violence, or threat of violence: No man, dont' do that, don't consume that material object to make you smile, because it's possible to smile in another way, and it's best of we all smile for the same reason.

That's nonsense. Oxygen is a fucking psychedelic, people are basically just soft rocks that are high as fuck. then they turn to gravel and dust, dirt, sand, desert. And it goes that way.'

Expected something but now tired, so end ; Memory is no longer useful. Words and so forth, could add more or edit, but would make less and less sense with each passing min…

>ahhhh so much to write, but it makes no sense anymore, imagine if we could just transmit meaning like temperature

It all makes sense mate. Even the end. I'm just high enough.

>Some get high on power, some sex, some games, some get high on taking care of a family and feeling "existentially meaningful" in that way, becuase they think time is real and future generations are intrinsically meaningful.

I think you're on to something incredible, Zhora, something many people rarely grasp. You're getting at the notion that presumably selfless behaviors are actually selfish. I suspect that, when we think that we don't want to do something, but do it anyway, we're actually doing what we want, and merely struggling with the frustration of conflicting desires.

For example, I wash my clothing because I want my clothes to be clean, at least more than I want to avoid the work, but I still would like to avoid the work too, and so I experience frustration while washing my clothes and tell myself that, "I don't want to be doing this," even though I clearly value the end-result.

If that's the case, then we really just choose what we want to do within the limitations of our realities, and those limitations frustrate us, because ideally the laundry would be washed and yet we wouldn't have to wash it, at least assuming it is ideal to get what we want.

All that said, if everything we do is selfish, if we can't do anything that isn't selfish, then doesn't that mean we are slaves to our desires? And if that's the case, well that sounds like a pretty hard thing to reconcile with the notion of free will. You might just come to suspect that we don't make any choices at all.

Dude the moon has been fucked as fuck for like the last two fucking nights, you better fuggin' believe I been scopin' that nigga out wif my 4x16 muh'fukka. Fuckin' lunar landscape, nigga. Shiz'dope. Space n' stuff. Gnawmeen?

There's this guy and in the future, they have plans to have some huge explosive weapon detonation on the moon and him and rest don't think it would have any, if not, no effect on us. Try and prevent this from happening it if you can, the link between us and the moon is sacred.

why would you not use your status to bang women? That's one of the reasons people get status. Why are women attracted to rich and powerful guys? because of their status. The majority of the women who slept with Terry Richardson did so because they knew sleeping with him would land them photoshoots which furthered their modeling career. Only years down the road when either they got more famous than him or their careers went nowhere they metoo'd him. Which gave them some fame and recognition.

>>4830678yes people say socially acceptable things that might not be the truth in a social environment. And those same women would sleep with a guy if they could either advance their career or get money

really someone is a tool for using their status to get laid? So are rockstars and musicians tools for having groupies? What kind of upside down world do we live in now

tell me something horrid you did in recent memory. make me feel better.awful human beings are more fun to be around anyway, right?I spur of the moment stole $50 from my loving, doting bf yesterday to buy a shoulder bag and some socks at the mall. bought soft pretzels for my friend too. when we got back i showed off the bag and said it was a gift from said friend then we went outside and laughed about it.

>>4830568But then you'd have to go to war with Persia over and over until the Arabs get their shit together and then the Catholics show up and then the Turks get their shit together and then it's Instant Bull

>>4830617I think the problem that these people have is their misunderstanding of the situation. There isn't a rape culture going on. Not a single dude says "fuck yeeer go rape dat bitch she has a skirt on brroooooo!!" And yet we're some how supposed to "teach men not to rape." The vast majority of men condemn rape. Everyone already knows that rape is bad. Except for the people who were going to be rapists anyways.

The problem is that even if you "teach men not to rape" there will be rapists. So people say "Don't dress like a slut, you gon' get raped" and others take that to mean that they're placing blame on the woman, rather than just being practical.

Like, it's not "rape culture" to say "Don't get wasted with a bunch of strangers." That's practical advice. Same with "Don't walk alone at night." and "Don't dress like a slut."

The argument is usually "But why do women have to put up withh thhaaattt??!" And it's like, I dunnoh, that's the world. I should be allowed to walk down the ghetto at night shouting "n-words n-words n-words" but I'd get shot, despite my right to free speech. So yes, women are allowed to dress any way they want, but the problem is that there will always be someone who views you as a target because of it.

Like, if you know there are sharks in the water, don't go in their wearing jewelry all over your open wounds. Sure, you can do that, and it's your right, but you're going to end up a victim and its hard to feel sympathy at that point because it was so obvious that you shouldn't have done that.

>>4830614You don't have to be saying a lot to be sperging out, it just needs to be stupid enough. Case in point: you showed up in the thread and accused someone of being a rape apologist for no reason. My diagnosis: you're gay and retarded.

>>4830620Yes I do. I'm glad you were mature enough to admit that. I'll consider letting you off the hook for ripping off my contribution to the woke thread too.

Why do you think that electrons act differently depending on whether we're looking at them or not? Is this the LOD system of the virtual reality engine in which we live in? Are atoms self-aware? Is this jeeeeesus? Google the double-slit experiment if you don't know what I'm talking about. This is some spooky stuff.

Hello I remember a picture posted here a while back it was a picture of a dead guy and the caption asking "are you drunk [Finnish name]?" and then in the next panel it zooms in on his face and says [Finnish name] is dead.I can't remember the name and I've never seen it posted anywhere, anyone have it? Or know where I could find it?

>>4830458Wth is going on in that picture.Even weirder than that one with the slavs gutting raw chickens and playing CS on CRT monitor PCs on the next pic. That one at least is logical. This I can't make sense of.

>>4830471It's probably a spay and neuter clinic. Animal shelters often have low cost spay and neuter events to help curb the excess cat population among poor people. My home city used to have them all the time. Got my two boys neutered for sixty bucks total. They even gave them shots!