Re: [trinity-users] KDE4 has deteriorated!

From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@...>Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:40:54 -0500

On 2011/12/26 15:24 (GMT) Lisi composed:
> On Monday 26 December 2011 15:10:08 Felix Miata wrote:>> Now with System V init having been replaced or set for replacement, my>> distaste for Debian clumping of everything into only two runlevels may>> disappear, which in turn might lead me to a new preference.> That's only the default. It is not compulsory. And there are four on my> Debian machines, 0, 1, 2, 6. I know that the rpm distros use different> runlevels - e.g. run-level 5 is the equivalent of Debian run-level 2 - but> surely they only have the same number of levels by default, just with> different numbers allocated to one or two of the levels? Extra ones can be> added in both types of distro. 0 and 6 are surely the same. And I thought> that 1 was too, but it is several years since I looked at this, so I may be> wrong on that.
When I say Debian has "two runlevels" I mean two "run" (continuously running)
levels, and don't count halt or reboot as run, leaving Debian with only two
"run" levels by default, single vs. everything. I never found any convenient
+ universal way to customize Debian runlevels, and since I have many systems
to deal with, I prefer distros with more operational segregation by default,
which is a distinction of most non-Debians. I don't like that to have
multiuser with networking to have X also defaulted. It makes X repair when
necessary more complicated, particularly to describe to someone needing
generic X repair help.
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/