A Wolf Amongst The Lambeth Palace Lambs?

by

Brian Gerrish

|
Monday, 25th January 2016

Sitting in the shadows with respect to his part in the commissioning of the Woolf report, Welby then allowed the press and media to publish that the Church of England had said that the report was a "sad waste" and had "fallen captive to liberal rationalism."

Aside from the links to grubby Soros corporate funding money I pointed out what was effectively gross hypocrisy - Welby was a Patron of the Woolf Institute which had commissioned the 'report' and yet he was then interviewed for the 'report' as if he was an independent bystander.

The image below provides a simple overview of the cosy arrangement between Welby, Woolf and the 'report' commissioners.

Sitting in the shadows with respect to his part in the commissioning of the Woolf report, Welby simply allowed the press and media to publish that the Church of England had said that the report was a "sad waste" and had "fallen captive to liberal rationalism." Forgive me for smelling a rat, but why the duplicity demonstrated by Welby the Patron and 'independent giver of evidence' to his own Woolf commission.

Aside from Soros, my previous article also identified the connections between the Woolf Intitute, and a number of other strange bedfellows for the church.

The diagram illustrates very simply a myriad of connections bewteen the Woolf Institute, departments of Cambridge University, and further afield to Saudi Arabia and Qatar - the latter countries well known for their appalling human rights records let alone the treatment of Christians.

It seemed a simple thing to email Lambeth Palace to ask Archbishop Welby for an explanation of all this, but it now appears that questions are perhaps rather embarrassing for the Bishop. I asked the following:

"1. Please can Archbishop Welby explain how he can act as a Patron of the Woolf Institute which has commissioned the Commission on Religion and Belief in Public Life report, and then sit as an 'independent' giver of evidence to a report that he has helped to commission?"

"2. Can he also explain how he can now personally support a report which decries his own Christian faith, and which has been heavily criticised by his own church?"

"3. In the interests of truth and transparency, and in view of his role as a patron of the Woolf Institute, can he also state how much money was received for the Commission from the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Woolf Institute and George Soros Open Society?"

The reply below was a masterpiece of obfuscation.

My questions to Archbishop Welby were simple, clear and direct. The reponse from Andrew Nunn is irrelevant and evasive. So why the eerie silence in Lambeth palace?

My conclusion is that Welby has been caught up to no good and he is now running from the truth. The Primate of All England is assisting the destruction of Christianity in these Islands and of his own church from within.

Is he something other than a Christian? The duplicity and deafening silence suggests there may well be a very dangerous wolf amongst the Lambeth Palace lambs.