Thanks, Thomas.It was your mention of Dealer's Signature that aroused my curiosity.I am not a fan of Dealer's Signature.

I can understand that. Mathematically one could present several ways of showing that "Dealers signature" is but an illusion born in the gamblers mind. Still, if you have been playing roulette (not RNGs) at Casinos for many years and apply some sort of a system and notation one could discern a clear difference, or slight disruption of the system output, just at the change between two dealers. Where you were winning, suddenly with the change you are starting to loose.

According to the Strong and weak law of large numbers this is the prevalent baseline of averages where any winning streak by the gambler is overcome by the parameters of the game. Hence a gambler should be aware of the temporal factor involved in the game or he will, sooner than later, enter the phase of loosing his money back to the bank. This simple little platform, basically a kids toy, shows when such periods occur and consequently one can just stop , collect winnings and leave the casino.

For example look at the session below. Third orange column presents an overwhelming anomaly on a auto roulette . The sectors are 8 and 29 (both 7 numbers wide). loss -14 win +22.

As you see I have 6 wins and 2 losses making a nice effortless profit of +104 units on 8 bets. That is an average return on every made bet/spin of 13 units!

As I said. Its a nice toy with a simple but highly efficient mapping. It is also color coded according to Goethes Theory of Colors, for faster adaptation decision when confronting changing of a multitude of conditions in a matrix of many important data.[/size][size=78%][/size]

PLEASE READ THIS TOPIC FROM KAV: "PLEASE STOP QUOTING PREVIOUS POSTS". SJÄLVKLART! "Our inability to see clearly is not due to any inadequate arrangement of the objekts" (M.M. Yogi).But if you are so obsessed with TWO, maybe you ought to read my brandnew topic in the flat betsection. You should expect TWO straight up hits per session.

I don't play online but in B&M casinos . Thomas.How much data do you collect to identify what to bet and when to stop ?Do you bet in a B&M casino ? I don't collect data but simply use maths but in a different way from most in this forum .Most seem to collect data but I think that the data still needs to be interpreted .This is the stumbling block - how to interpret the data .

It's good to know and quite logical. And I think I have never seen two really big caps in order smaller gab cap and then bigger big gap when you get that extreme 370 spin gap then you can quite good confidently at least think that the next cap is smaller and start bet the progression somewhere like 250 spins if its available . But I don't really know what's up with the double and triple snap backs those things are quite even.

I don't play online but in B&M casinos . Thomas.How much data do you collect to identify what to bet and when to stop ?Do you bet in a B&M casino ? I don't collect data but simply use maths but in a different way from most in this forum .Most seem to collect data but I think that the data still needs to be interpreted .This is the stumbling block - how to interpret the data .

Whenever I am on travel I bet at B&M Casinos (I love the special ambience found in some of them plus the pleasure of having a big pile of chips on the table.)

When I play online at the safe casinos I have selected through the years, I use my developed platforms, all containing very advanced algorithms (except this little toy i posted on this thread)

I usually only need 20 spins, then I have sufficient information on statistical probability, statistical anomaly (standard deviation) and some other info. You can see some of those values in the little platform I posted. All instantly at my finger tips, which gives me sufficient time to bet on the most probable sector/s of the wheel.

I never play the table. That is a given loser however you try to derive patterns of numbers from it. True and smart roulette play is always about the wheel. Any professional player knows that.

Concerning stops, my platforms gives me a nice red stop light whenever the betting conditions are not good and the variance curve is against my bet selections.

In B&M Casinos, where I cannot use my platforms on a Pad or similar computer, I use basic sector probability and partition math (all converted into a nice tiny chart). Nothing strange. It is enough to generate a nice profit if played carefully and get a nice day and evening in the town I am visiting at any given travel.

So you are not a Roulette Professional then Thomas , but a travelling businessman ?I don't agree that The Only Way to beat roulette is by using only the Wheel to determine what numbers to bet .Though you are not alone here. Some members hers take the same view but then proceed to undermine their position. I think you are in danger of the same in your unsubstantiated view that using " The Table ".is necessarily loser .All the numbers on the wheel are replicated on the table and one of those numbers MUST be in A DozenA ColumnIt must be one of the Even - Chances etc.Maths deals with numbers and Roulette is about numbers so why cannot Maths be used since numbers are in it's Province ? You claim too much when you claim that The Wheel is the Only Way to go. Nor do I think that any Professional Mathematician would agree with you that 20 numbers is sufficient data to determine Standard Deviation so your view here is clearly wrong.Be satisfied that you win but don't try and hoodwink us that Probability Theory cannot be used other than withself - styled AP.We win . You win. Leave it at that and don't abuse others because they don't agree with your viewpoint .

We win . You win. Leave it at that and don't abuse others because they don't agree with your viewpoint .

Listen, pal. You asked me a couple of questions and I took time and answered my point of view on the matter. What you think is true about what I use during my roulette sessions as a probability baseline isn´t worth much in my eyes. I ve seen your posts, and the level of your "roulette knowledge", and I ain´t impressed to put it mildly.

This hostile response from you in the quote above is nothing less than childish. If you cannot handle a response on a question you asked another member here, then don´t ask.