January 14, 2014

If you've been following the news lately, you'll know that one of the most important issues in the world, perhaps second only to transgender awareness, is The War on The War on Women. As you hopefully have been informed, men and women are two separate species locked in an endless zero sum war of attrition, so it's very, very important for society to focus on promoting women, and not get distracted by irrelevant details about precisely which women get promoted. The women getting the really good jobs aren't doing it for themselves, they're doing it to make the world better for all of us.

Stay focused, people.

For example, it was extremely important that Janet Yellen rather than Larry Summers get to be the Chairperson of the Federal Reserve Board because they come from such wildly different backgrounds: she was a girl and he was a boy. We're talking diversity. Similarly, if you've been paying attention to the news, you know that it's crucial that Sheryl Sandberg's Silicon Valley career thrive.

Facebook exec David Fischer and his dad, Fed choice Stanley Fischer, are both well-suited to work for powerful women bosses.

FORTUNE -- Sheryl Sandberg must be the most politically connected executive in Silicon Valley.

There she was in Washington, D.C., last month when President Obama hosted a powwow with tech honchos at the White House.

Fifteen years earlier, the Facebook (FB) COO served as chief of staff to Larry Summers when he was Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration.

And last year, when Summers was being considered to chair the Federal Reserve, Sandberg leaned in to support him.

Sandberg's mentor didn't get the Fed job—it went to Janet Yellen. But now it appears that Sandberg will have one degree of separation from the next No. 2 at the Fed. Obama's choice to be the Fed's next vice-chairman is Stanley Fischer, whose son David is Sandberg's longtime deputy.

David Fischer is VP of Advertising and Global Operations at Facebook. Before Sandberg lured him to Facebook in 2010, he spent more than seven years working for her at Google (GOOG), helping her build a 4,000-employee ad operations group—and taking her job as VP of online sales and operations when she left. Famously thoughtful, calm and unflappable, Fischer first earned Sandberg's praise when he worked for her at Treasury.

Like son, like father? Apparently. The elder Fischer, whom Sandberg indeed knows, is renowned as a low-key, low-ego, and evenhanded economist—the same rep that Yellen has. Once Ben Bernanke's thesis adviser at MIT, Stanley Fischer, 70, has been the World Bank's chief economist, the IMF's No. 2, a Citigroup (C) vice-chairman, and the head of the Bank of Israel, where he steered the central bank through the 2008 global economic crisis with remarkable finesse.

That's such an impressive resume that some people doubted that Fischer would agree to be No. 2 at the Fed--but Yellen reportedly pushed the White House to ask him. If he's confirmed, Fischers father and son will be working for two of the most powerful women in the world.

"Gulenist school advocates have said that they are based on Gulen's teachings... they said, schools are based on the vague, mystic adages of Gulen that 'whomever is not everywhere is nowhere' and that 'you must be globalized to be localized.'"

"but when Gulen approached Istanbul's chief rabbi in 2005 for a letter of support to help Gulen extend his stay in the United States, the rabbi told U.S. officials in private that he was wary of the movement's ultimate intentions."

Btw, if Fischer is such a wonderful guy, has he said anything about the plight of Palestinians living under Ziotheid? Surely, such a humanitarian would not be an arch-nationalist but a compassionate internationalist sensitive to the needs of worst off members of society in Israel/Palestine.

I'm sure he cares about us as much as he cares about Palestinians. He loves all of us.

This and other examples of the handiwork of the architects of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, preeminent among whom was Ariel Sharon, failed to make it into most of the hagiographic coverage of the man's passing in the American and Israeli media. We were instead told that Sharon was "controversial," and that Palestinians had criticisms of him, but that he was a "hero," a "staunch defender of Israel's security," and most grotesquely, "a peacemaker."

I thought his statements regarding his continued loyalty to Israel were the biggest disqualifying factor, but having a son who's an executive at Mark Fuckerberg's Facebook is even worse. Few companies, if any, have ever so openly and rapidly embraced unethical behavior as quickly as Facebook has.

Despite being a Brown (pits of the IV league) graduate, Janet Yellen was not a national merit scholar. Ben Bernanke was. So we go from a >136 IQ Fed chairmen to a <= 136 Fed chairman who, for all we know, got a sub-700 math SAT.

So, a government employee gets a job at a large spy-agency that makes money from advertising. She then hops to another spy agency that makes money from advertising, taking her deupty with her. Her ex-boss wants to become Fed-chairman, but he can't because he once said something that was true, so he insists that his ex-boss, who is the deupty's father, become deputy chairman (and likely eminence grise of the Federal Reserve), despite the fact that he serves a foreign power to which he owes his primary loyalty. All these people have had well-paid jobs thier entire adult lives in non-productive enterprises that involve pushing paper, influence peddling, and advertising. They also all happen to belong to one particular ethnic group.

A healthy political order is like an eco-system where different forces are balanced.

But what we have is an echo-system where the media, government, academia, and etc. all echo the same official truths. We should let one organism take over everything since it's the best for everything.

"in the United States at least, anti-Semitism is a spent force — witness the appointment of the third Jew in a row to head the Federal Reserve. A generation ago, more than a few commentators would have mentioned the International Jewish Conspiracy or some such thing. That now exists only in the rattled brain of a Louis Farrakhan."

And Sailer. Rotfl.

This is a typical Jewish tactic. There are only two possible responses to overweening Jewish power:

1. Total acquiescence and obedience. Such is good and not 'antisemitic'.

2. Total lunacy on the scale of Farrakhan and Hitler.

There can be NOTHING in between. There can be no rational and sensible discussion of the nature and the extent of Jewish power(though Jews still think country clubs not admitting Jews was the greatest injustice since the Holocaust). So, two generations ago, anyone who might have broached the possible problem of three straight Jewish appointments to the Fed could only have been a lunatic on the level of Farrakhan. There couldn't have been or can be any other possibility. It's either white or black with no grey in between. It's the one-drop Jewish rule. If your views have just one drop of criticism of Jewish power, then you're a full-blown Nazi.

But it's so much better now since no one, from the left to right, notices or says anything. Is it the really the case of antisemitism as a spent force or Jewish supremacism as a totally dominant force so that everyone is running scared?

Same is happening with the homo thing. Is the sheer fading of criticism due to end of 'homophobia' or absolute fear of Jewish elites who will defame and ruin any critic of their favored allies?

As with the discussion of race--if you disagree with PC orthodoxy, you are a Nazi or KKK--, the discussion of Jewish power is SHUT UP AND SWALLOW OR YOU'RE A NUT LIKE FARRAKHAN/HITLER. There can be no other possibility.

It sounds like Third World dictators calling anyone left of the far right a 'communist'. Joe McCarthy tended to call anyone left of conservatism--and even conservatives--a 'communist'. Now, Jews are acting the same way. "If you criticize us or pry into our power even just a little, you are a Nazi or Nation of Islam."

An engineer for a major American defense contractor tried to smuggle thousands of secret documents, including blueprints, on America's multi-billion-dollar F-35 stealth fighter to Iran in boxes labeled as "household goods," U.S. prosecutors say.

Yes, only a racist could find cause for concern over dual citizens being given access to powerful positions in our multicultural republic.

Mozaffar Khazaee, a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen, was reportedly arrested late last week as he was attempting to travel to Germany and then on to Iran. Weeks earlier, Khazaee had arranged for a shipping company to take boxes containing "sensitive technical manuals, specification sheets, and other proprietary material" related to the F-35 and its engines to a contact in Iran, according to an affidavit filed by a Special Agent of Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Homeland Security Investigations.<<

Mark Zuckerberg and his pals at Facebook are quite possibly the most brazenly unethical businessmen in the country. Zuckerberg stole his idea for Facebook, flagrantly violates user privacy, tracks his users all across the web (even when not logged in to Facebook), has basically decided to never delete any information they acquire, and his pal Saverin left the US to avoid taxes on his stock.

So the fact that Fischer's son works for that company is supposed to be a selling point?

An engineer for a major American defense contractor tried to smuggle thousands of secret documents, including blueprints, on America's multi-billion-dollar F-35 stealth fighter to Iran in boxes labeled as "household goods," U.S. prosecutors say.

Am I missing something, here? Watermarks, special paper, etc? Or am I correct in assessing Iranian spycraft as sorely lacking? FFS, ever heard of scanners and thumb drives, guys? Or, hell, email? Jesus. Actually, it smells like a false flag op, now that I think about it; all those boxes and boxes and thousands of documents are for the anchorpersons to give to the rubes, maybe?

Here's the Google Wallet FAQ. From it: "You will need to have (or sign up for) Google Wallet to send or receive money. If you have ever purchased anything on Google Play, then you most likely already have a Google Wallet. If you do not yet have a Google Wallet, don’t worry, the process is simple: go to wallet.google.com and follow the steps." You probably already have a Google ID and password, which Google Wallet uses, so signing up Wallet is pretty painless.

You can put money into your Google Wallet Balance from your bank account and send it with no service fee.

Google Wallet works from both a website and a smartphone app (Android and iPhone -- the Google Wallet app is currently available only in the U.S., but the Google Wallet website can be used in 160 countries).

Or, once you sign up with Google Wallet, you can simply send money via credit card, bank transfer, or Wallet Balance as an attachment from Google's free Gmail email service. Here'show to do it.

(Non-tax deductible.)

Fourth: if you have a Wells Fargo bank account, you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Wells Fargo SurePay. Just tell WF SurePay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). (Non-tax deductible.)

Fifth: if you have a Chase bank account (or, theoretically,other bank accounts), you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Chase QuickPay (FAQ). Just tell Chase QuickPay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address (steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). If Chase asks for the name on my account, it's Steven Sailer with an n at the end of Steven. (Non-tax deductible.)

My Book:

"Steve Sailer gives us the real Barack Obama, who turns out to be very, very different - and much more interesting - than the bland healer/uniter image stitched together out of whole cloth this past six years by Obama's packager, David Axelrod. Making heavy use of Obama's own writings, which he admires for their literary artistry, Sailer gives the deepest insights I have yet seen into Obama's lifelong obsession with 'race and inheritance,' and rounds off his brilliant character portrait with speculations on how Obama's personality might play out in the Presidency." - John Derbyshire Author, "Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics" Click on the image above to buy my book, a reader's guide to the new President's autobiography.