I agree. Even when Fed plays a much lower ranked player he somehow manages to make the match entertaining. Djoker, on the other hand, in a mismatched situation literally puts me to sleep. In fact i did fall asleep during his match with Bautista-Agut. It wasn't until B-A suddenly started playing better and the crowd woke me up with their cheering that it got interesting.

the problem with Novak's game is that most players are the same style as his nowadays (baseline grinders/retrievers) so when he plays a lower ranked guy like seppi, he is effectively playing a lesser version of himself.

homogenised courts = homogenised players
more court diversity is needed so we can see what makes Novak and his types special. Novak Vs. Murray at AO final this year wasn't as interesting as Wawrinka Vs. Novak, or Federer Vs. Murray. Because Murray and Novak are too similar in style.

Imagine if all players were big servers like Isner and Roanic... Boring. Too similar.

Federer contrasts well with so many players because he has such a diverse style. Can retrieve from baseline, can hit flat and powerful through the court, can hit with spin, can serve big and volley and can be an all courter... all in the same set or even game.

Really? I find Nole more exciting overall (Not his game) but his demeanor and crazy personality especially after big wins. Fed's game is aesthetically pleasing to watch (not the most fun to watch though) but his demeanor and personality? Id rather watch a dog lick itself to be quite honest. Fed's personality and demeanor is BORING. His game from 2005-present is actually more boring then it was when he was from 2001-2003

Interesting how they swap the roles once they leave the courts....
Federer becomes a stuck up, money loving, always same crap Swiss, and Novak turns into open minded, fun and free speaking guy...

Federer's style is probably going to remain the best and most enjoyable to watch, for a long time. His movement, floating on the court, smooth shots and limited court emotions are indeed pure joy to watch.
It even becomes more entertaining when he is getting his ***** kicked and when he puts some emotions into it....

the problem with Novak's game is that most players are the same style as his nowadays (baseline grinders/retrievers) so when he plays a lower ranked guy like seppi, he is effectively playing a lesser version of himself.

homogenised courts = homogenised players
more court diversity is needed so we can see what makes Novak and his types special. Novak Vs. Murray at AO final this year wasn't as interesting as Wawrinka Vs. Novak, or Federer Vs. Murray. Because Murray and Novak are too similar in style.

Imagine if all players were big servers like Isner and Roanic... Boring. Too similar.

Federer contrasts well with so many players because he has such a diverse style. Can retrieve from baseline, can hit flat and powerful through the court, can hit with spin, can serve big and volley and can be an all courter... all in the same set or even game.

EXACTLY!! A lot of matches with players playing the exact same type of tennis with one being more talented than the other. No variation aside from the occasional exciting point where a net approach gets mixed in despite their best efforts.