Industry experts say the regulatory shift could mean a 20 percent annual boost in export sales, but a pair of policy researchers warn of risks to national security. (Photo: Chris Eger/Guns.com)

A report released Monday warns of the implications of a pending Trump administration plan that would ease regulations on weapons exports.

The Institute for Science and International Security released the report, which says the regulatory shift “could contribute to the proliferation of U.S. firearms worldwide to nefarious countries and to terrorists.”

Currently, the international sale of three categories of weapons are controlled by the State Department. But the Trump administration is planning to shift oversight of the weapons, including firearms, assault weapons, combat shotguns, and ammunition and ordnance to the more relaxed Commerce Department.

“There will be more leeway to do arms sales,” a senior administration official told Reuters earlier this month. “You could really turn the spigot on if you do it the right way.”

Industry experts agree. Lawrence Keane, the senior vice president of the National Shooting Sports Foundation said the rule change could boost export sales by as much as 20 percent annually. But in the report released Monday, policy researchers say “the potential risks to U.S. national security are dire” if the regulatory shift is finalized.

They say the move to Commerce Department oversight could mean the weapons would be eligible for a licensing exemption under the Strategic Trade Authorization – an Obama era initiative meant to loosen export restrictions.

“The Strategic Trade Authorization could be exploited by front companies or other illicit procurement efforts for a long duration before U.S. export control or enforcement agencies would catch on, allowing proliferators or terrorists to traffic U.S guns,” wrote researchers Andrea Stricker and David Albright.

Stricker and Albright wrote that the State Department weighs transfers based on political and national security considerations, whereas the Commerce Department is more concerned with promoting exports.

The researchers recommend that the Trump administration review the transfers and prevent the weapons from becoming eligible for a license exemption under the Strategic Trade Authorization. If Trump’s team doesn’t do that, the researchers say the weapons exports should remain under the purview of the State Department.

“The deadliest weapons must be kept out of the hands of U.S. adversaries as a foremost priority over the goal of increasing exports of such items,” wrote Stricker and Albright. “The potential downsides are not worth the apparent benefits.”

The regulatory changes could become public this fall, and after a period of public comment, could be implemented early next year.

“The NSC is working through the interagency process with the State Department and the Department of Commerce to ensure that U.S. industries have every advantage in the global marketplace, while at the same time ensuring the responsible export of arms,” said an official with the White House National Security Council earlier this month.

More chicken Little “The Sky is falling” crap. The same possibility of goods being redirected or sold to unauthorized third parties under State Dept oversight. The Commerce Dept must comply with established Sanction/restrictions. This move also takes the State Dept’s domestic gun control agenda off the table.

Bullshlt. I didn’t recall us finding any Adams Arms AK47s over there in lybia, Afgan, or Iraq. That is because the terrorist get thier guns from Russian and Chinese manufacturers.

The_Real_Charlie_Horse

Lets weigh the options. $600 for an American made sporter AK, or $75 for a surplus AK from an African Warlord. Which one is a man funding a private army going to choose? This study obviously had very little study going on. More than likely it was just a poll of the opinions of anti-firearm “experts”.

AndrusskenN

exactly

Cory C

Bingo.

AndrusskenN

Cease all gun exports, and terrorists will still have no problem getting guns. They prefer Russian and Chinese AK’s anyway.

Note: the acronym for Institute for Science and International Security is “ISIS.”

uncle bobedy

When former Secretary of State Clinton and Former President Obama were asked to comment on a newly released report from [insert any name followed by researcher, fellow, etc] about the effects of Democrat controlled government and the concurrent rise in global terror, their response was a flippant, “What difference at this point does it make” and, “It’s easier for a kid who could be my son [age reduced to promote anti-gun agenda via emotion] to get a gun than a book”.

Flush the toilet whenever one of these corruptions shet’s our a “report” about guns, cause it’s just another floating mess.

p.s. Dear Miss Sarah Huckabee Sanders, please ask the President to respond from now on, to WHATEVER the left media and co, says with a single constant response, “I won and you lost”. Thank you!