No planes at the World Trade Center, why the movement will always hide this fact at all costs

Whilst the idea of no planes at the World Trade Center was floated as early as 2001 by Nico Haupt and others, the hypothesis wasn't taken "seriously" until around late 2004, 2005 and early 2006. Right around a year before September Clues was released. Of course, there had been many challenges to the very official idea that passenger jets collided with the World Trade Centre, usually taking the form of Plane Switch theories, Pods and Flashes, the idea the planes were real but Modified fuel tankers and suchlike. With hindsight, it is very easy to lump all these theories together, but out of respect, they were due diligently researched at the time by many dedicated researchers, and infact almost all had their own followers, they weren't all postulated by the same groups of researchers. The Pod theory came from Lets Roll Forums for example, and was in regards to the second impact. In Plane Site, released in 2004, borrowed heavily from LRF research, however went one step further and suggested Flight 11 also had a Pod, but this was debated at LRF. Many sub sets believed things ranging from a Missile hitting the North Tower, a modified DC 10, and other ideas. It must be born in mind it was much easier to suggest that a plane didn't hit the North Tower at the time, because as only one clear video of that event existed, and the plane was hardly very clear in the shot, the postulators were hardly suggesting media fakery was involved, so long as of course they suggested a missile impact or some other technology. Something physical of course. This has always been the LRF angle. Something physical as oppose to video manipulation. Of course, much good research had been done there and in other places about the idea the Naudet film was a set up, and of course watching what could only be described as a perfect swing of the camera by Jules Naudet, as well as many other perfect zoom in and zoom outs on all crash shots, and tower demolition shots, it was always presumed the cameramen or women had foreknowledge of what was about to happen. However, the idea the images were real was never challenged. That is what has been, and as I will go into further detail, what will always be, protected, at all costs. You can believe the Naudet story was a scam, you can believe there were 300 or more camera men or women out in the street who all captured the event perfectly and knew what was going to happen. As long as you didn't challenge the validity of the footage that was fine. That is as far as it was ever taken on LRF, probably the most liberal truth forum up until that point. As long as there was a camera person in the street who filmed what happened, it really did not matter if you suggested it was a passenger jet, an orb, a blimp, a hot air balloon, or even a baseball. Just as long as the film was authentic. Protect the media at all costs.

Whilst it is very hard to argue anyone in 2012 who believes any planes were used at all is a serious top flight researcher, this was not always the case. Many people (myself included) were at the most 50-50 on the issue for a very long time, because we never knew any better, and there were so many rabbit trails to go down. It must be said though, people were not totally ignorant of all the issues with "planes". People understood the physics of the crashes were in the very least suspicious, the idea an aluminum plane could penetrate the aluminum cladding, steel curtain wall, thick safety glass, and with a wingspan of at least 7 floors, many layers of 4 inch thick concrete, steel decking, webs of trusses, and office furniture, going all the way from one side of the tower to the other, AND THEN, the engines having enough energy to penetrate through the safety glass, steel curtain wall and aluminum cladding (all without leaving a hole in the other side of the tower), well, the idea was far fetched in the least. So enter the Pod theory, where a bulge on the underside of the craft fired a missile at or just before impact, which I guess cleared the path for the plane. Quite bizarre in itself really given the videos showed none of this, except a small flash at impact. But this idea was taken seriously by many. LRF even went as far as to produce merchandise including but not limited to t-shirts to promote this theory. This idea was also sometimes coupled with other ideas, such as the plane was packed to the brim with explosives, and or the impact floors of the building were blown out with their own explosives, at or just prior to impact. The last two ideas are actually more plausible than the Pod idea itself, in theory anyway. But once again, all photos and videos were authentic.

Enter early 2006. A new influx of "researchers" started appearing on 9/11 forums, promoting a new idea, that (at least) the second impact was fraudulent, no plane hit WTC 2. It was either a missile, or a bomb, or nothing. Subsequently, for the first time, the images were being challenged. Many of these posters were probably legit and clung on to the new refreshing idea, but many were also obvious plants designed to stir up emotions and essentially ruin the idea. LRF was notorious for banning this research or limiting it, the Admin Phil Jayhan banning MANY posters for promoting the idea no plane hit WTC 2. This was in obvious conflict with their precious Pod theory, and he was having none of it. The research was eventually allowed, however often relegated to sub sections of forums such as "No plane, No brain" sections, mocking the idea and making it clear it was a fringe theory, not to be discussed seriously.Laughable really given Jayhan himself is now a No Planer, his previous Pod theory now totally incompatible with his new empty towers stance. If Jayhan had even a modicum of respectability in the glory years of LRF, it is not totally gone. Which is ironic and deliberate given his latest stance is as close to the truth as his website has ever been in the past. His website is almost dead now with very few new threads. During my tenure there I witnessed a great many legitimate posters be banned and harassed for posting no plane research, even at the point wherehe agreed with them in theory. It was pathetic to watch and I no longer wanted any part of it.

So of course, by the time September Clues came out in 2007, the idea was already viewed as hogwash by many. Every 9/11 guy out there told you not to look at it, Alex Jones made a comparison to Mental Illness, and guys like Ace Baker, Nico Haupt and others deliberately made themselves look crazy whilst promoting the "fringe idea". A real shame too that Clues was not narrated, and had an amateurish feel to it, as previously slick productions like Loose Change Second Edition trumped it in many peoples eyes. So much of the 9/11 audience simply refuse to take the idea seriously, but as I will layout, there is more motivation to protect this idea than EVEN the idea the official story is untrue. Even websites like WTC7.net started putting disclaimers on their site as early as 2007 saying "we do not promote no jetliner theories, or incivility." Molding the two together, assuming no planers are there to start trouble and infighting, as many of the plant posters in 2006 did. They ruined the idea before it got to the mainstream. But on with the show;

For starters, no plane insults are asinine. Most 9/11 truthers have always been no planers for 2 out of 4 of the crashes that day. Including all on LRF, who practically invented the no plane no brain chant. Though there are some figureheads such as Jim Hoffman, Steven Jones etc who have not challenged the idea that four civilian planes crashed on 9/11, the vast bulk of the truth movement do not believe that Flights 11, 77, 175 and 93 took off that day and crashed where stated. So it's okay to be a no planer, as long as its for 2/4 of the events? Right. So I guess the only difference between flight 77 and 175 and 11 is that it was shown on film. After All, there are witnesses to all four crashes, so how is it witnesses in Shanksville and Washington can be discounted, but witnesses in NYC must be taken at face value, despite all reporting vastly different types of aircraft. So I guess the only thing left is the films, which have demonstrably proven as fake. From the fact that commercial jets cannot do 550mph at sea level, to the fact no black boxes were found, to the fact that the videos are all fake and show vastly different trajectories, to the fact a jet engine cannot fly 500 meters and land on a street corner with no witnesses, to countless other facts, the evidence is clear that no planes crashed in NYC. If you cannot see that, the scope of this blog is beyond you. I am not here to insult you, but direct you to other research on The Real News Online and other sites. The scope of this blog is to demonstrate WHY the movement will always protect the idea.

The idea they would use any real planes it outrageous. They have to be in control of every variable, and the only way to ensure that is to fake the videos. Nothing can go wrong. They have total control of the stage. There is no proof of any planes. For the first time in aviation history, black boxes are missing, four of them. A continuous looping tape on flight 93 managed to lose the last 3 minutes of its audio, this is impossible. Don't people think that if planes really took off that day they would just release the security tapes of people boarding the flights? Nothing to lose. The news footage shows a 50-60 story fireball, a 50 story orange fireball. The soot part even higher. This is outrageous. The orange flame part of a fireball from a 767 crash would never be much higher than 3 or 4 stories at the most. Many videos of 767's crashing exist. The schematics of the crash are totally wrong. That is like a jet crashing into the street and the fireball going higher than the tallest skyscrapers. Never would happen. The plane hits floor 78 and the orange part of the fireball goes at least 10 stories beyond the roof line, the soot even higher before it molds into the existing smoke. This is laughable to believe that could ever happen, much less with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel.

The reason that the movement protect this idea is two-fold. Firstly, they have to have the figure of 3000 people dying. Once you know that over 250 people did not die in plane crashes, you do tend to question the final death toll more, however the alleged flights 77 and 93 were sparsely occupied, so the finality of the toll would not be affected much.

The second is that once you take the planes out of the equation, many parts of the rest of the story start to crumble. Firstly, how can the news footage of the towers burning for an hour be true if no plane hit the tower? What is creating and sustaining those fires? How could you then have people up there starting fires if the building was fully occupied? And how would they get out? If no plane it the tower, why are all those people jumping out? Even if they blew a hole in the side of the tower, this wouldn't start a massive fire or make people jump out. How would they get a perfect sized gash in the tower? If people were up there starting fires, how can the jumpers be real? How did the fires become black just like jet fuel would? Who would put themselves in that kind of danger to light those fires? If no plane hit, then why would people be trapped at all? It's not like all that plane debris would be blocking the stair cases. If the tower is full, you can't have any of this. There would be so many witnesses to these phantom guys starting fires in the building. Jayhan tries to explain this with his "smoke machines", but you can't have smoke without fire Phil, so what is causing the fires?

Jim Fetzer and others have tried to explain no planes with a hologram theory, but again this doesn't advance the idea much nor explain any of the above pitfalls. Fetzer has even advanced the idea a cloaked plane 1400 feet to the right projected this hologram over NYC and into the building. The schematics of the hologram theory are outside the scope of this blog, but needless to say, it still preserves the idea of a full occupied building. How did the 25,000 people in the tower or the thousands on the street (assuming that is the case which it wasn't), not see this plane offshore? What a ridiculous risk to go to when you can just fake the videos. Fetzer promotes Richard Halls 9/11 study, however after much review and critique, I find it no more scientific than the NIST report, he draws line of data that don't even exist, much like NIST don't focus on the events after "initiation of collapse" and assume everything is automatic.Real scientists assume NOTHING and I am truly surprised a scholar like Fetzer would consider Halls study in any way scientific. Any theory as long as the buildings are full, the streets are full of witnesses, and the cameras are rolling and capturing the actual event, they don't care what advanced truthers believe. Grilled Cheese Sandwich hit the WTC? No problem, as long as they keep the media complicity out of it. Jim Fetzer was quoted on Dose of Reality with Brian SStaveley and Justin Cooke, when confronted about the absurd trajectory on the dive bomber shot and others, "Oh well, what they probably did was throw in a few tampered videos to confuse the situation". Well first off Jim, those videos were broadcast on CBS on the DAY of 9/11. Secondly, once you admit even one of the network shots might not be legit, you call into question the entire Richard Hall study, which is based solely off network and home videos.

The hologram theory still has all the same pitfalls listed earlier. How do you get the fires? How do you get the Jet Engine and landing gear in the street? Must have been planted, and if so, how did they do that with thousands of people on the street? If you are forced to admit those shots are doctored too it further damages the hologram theory. The hologram theory is designed once again to keep the media out of it, to protect the idea of empty towers and floors not being complete. What of the jumpers? If they are not inhaling the toxic fumes of jet fuel than why on earth are they jumping? And obviously, if you continue to deny the media fakery than you must also account for jumpers being 50 feet out from the towers, Photoshop and so on. Good luck denying all the irrefutable evidence posted on these Photoshops at The Real News Online, Clues forum and LRF about this subject. LRF has excellent research about fake jumpers, they just reach sometimes different conclusions about how that effect was achieved, though recently they seem to have backed away from the dummies out the windows theory, to their credit. Lets Roll Forums has arguably one of the most vast and proficient research teams ever seen in the movement, it's just a shame their admin and several of their mods clearly possess an agenda to hide the final 25% of the truth being exposed at Cluesforum, The Real News Online and other outlets, as well as attack vehemently those who attempt to preach this to the public, like Brian S Staveley and Simon Shack.

The only explanation for all of the above is media fakery. It is the only way for the perps to be in total control. It is provable beyond all shadow of a doubt to those who will only look. The idea they would use real planes is too risky. Also hologram technology is largely untested, and what of the risks of the image at that height reflecting off other buildings, or shadowing in as it hit the tower and reflecting off the glass of the building. The extreme risk of the shaped charges not creating the correct looking holes in the towers, the key to remember is they only had one shot at all of this. The towers do not look even remotely real in any of the moving video. The correct look was glassy and silvery, with a tinge of black. Below are two excellent scenes shot in 1991, starting at 6.47 that show the correct look of the towers.

Compare this to the washed out, cardboard box looking, windowless boxes in the 9/11 footage and the result is stark.

Regular cameras in 1991 show the correct look, and yet in 2001 this is the best they can manage. Notice the definition of windows in the foreground buildings and the lack thereof in the WTC. It is worth noting that around 1996 they changed the Friends intro for example, and many movies and TV shows stopped showing the correct WTC coloring, a definite and disgraceful attempt at pre programming.

Hopefully over the course of the last two years it has become very obvious why the 9/11 figureheads avoid no planes at the WTC at all costs. And a few who don't ignore it such as Phil Jayhan and Jim Fetzer, attempt to do all they can to muddy the waters and promote outrageous sub theories to distract the dedicated minority who see through the bullshit of Alex Jones, Dylan Avery and the big players in 9/11 truth. They do so because the agenda number one has always been to protect the media. Though I am sure their preference is you believe the official story, they really could care less if you think Martians from planet Zhog attacked the WTC on 9/11. Just as long as you are unaware that the MEDIA attacked the WTC on 9/11. Now, just to clarify, obviously anyone who believes that 9/11 was an inside job, does not trust the media per say. They know (hopefully) they are controlled, a propaganda machine, and they lie and deceive the public. However they still assume that as current affairs people are journalists, they will at least provide us with coverage of events, and that their news footage and videos can more or less be trusted. If they cover a war, terrorist attack or court case, whilst knowing that the motives and perps behind those events are probably not as we are told, the COVERAGE of the event is truthful and the images are real. It is this, and only this, at the bottom line, that the powers that be wish more than anything else to protect from the world.

It is the WORLD media. It is far too easy to blame the 9/11 attacks on the "American Government". It is also grossly unfair on the American public. The same forces that control things behind the scenes control all our countries spare 4 or 5 in the world. No one is safe from their oppression and nobody is safe from their persecution. We at The Real News Online.Com have contributors from all over the planet and it would be naive of any of us to think we are any safer than each other from their persecution and their torment. They want you to think it's the US Government doing these things. That changes every four or 8 years. By the time their "crimes" are fully exposed that regime is often out and a new one is in. Maybe even the next one after that., but the media never really changes, nor the people behind the scenes pulling the strings, carrying out these hoaxes.

Suppression of the no plane evidence definitely serves to carry out this agenda. By keeping the focus off the media, and on god knows who. We have had many callers into our radio show over the last year, all trying to argue planes hit the WTC, Pentagon etc. They always end up in the same rhetoric "We need to get Bush, Cheney and their masters, those homosexual bastards" and on and on it goes, and on and on it goes. Those guys will all be dead before too long, then what? You will have nothing more to say, and the next false flag hoax media attack will already be underway. And so the cycle repeats.

This piece right here is to raise awareness to the everyday American who has no idea what is going on with our international affairs particularly Iran. Many of you as I did for many years thought the United States was the world police and we need to stop worrying about everyone else. That is not the case. The truth is we are an empire now. An empire on a conquest to take over the whole world. We have been invading people unjustly for years and years. Beleive me I am all for defending ourselves when attacked or even when provoked. That I believe is the case with most Americans. The deception lies in the original attack. The attack that drags us into war is almost always staged by us to get us into the war. I could give you example after example after example. Later in this piece I will just give you a few. I will start with ones a few years back in the past where it is now public knowledge that we staged the attack on ourselves to draw us into conflict.This is the same strategy being used today with Iran. They are telling us Iran is developing Nukes. Sound familiar(Iraq). Nuclear weapons are the ultimate scare tatic. Did you know how many violations Iran has recieved due to its nuclear program? How many times has the IEAI flagged them? ZERO. Its never happened. They are not developing Nukes and as a matter fo fact Pinetta slipped up and said Iran was NOT developing a nuclear weapon. Well thats funny isnt that the opposite of what the media and the government is telling us? They tell us things like they are only a year away from having launch capabilities. ITs bogus. This is the sort of thing that would get the American people scared, then when they are scared they look to government for protection. After that they go along with the bombing of Iran because they think it is neccessary to be safe from them when in fact there never was a threat. Just another clever campaign by the establishment to demonize another nation and strike fear into its own citizens.

They tried baiting Iran into conflict by flying drones over their airspace. Then we make a big deal A. when they don't return it which is LAUGHABLE and B. by saying they were somehow hostile to shoot it down! Thats a joke. Wouldnt any nation blast another countries spy drone right outta the air??

They lie to you on so many fronts to get you to support their war monger actions against another sovereign nation, Iran. They tell you their president said "He was going to wipe Israel off the map" This is ANOTHER purposely BOTCHED translation. Don't beleive everything or even anything you see on TV. Get a real translator and see what he really said. He said something to the effect of " We need to be rid of the REGIME is Israel". Now isnt that much different?

Who are we to tell them if they can and can't have nukes. They let the inspectors in. They found nothing so once again just like in Iraq we don't give a damn what the inspectors say unless they found something in our favor! Isn't it funny we are the world police on nukes but we are the only ones to ever nuke a whole city and we did it twice!!!?? We spewed all this propaganda about Iraq. Said we had to remove Saddam because he had WMDs. Did you know that we have been using nuclear weapons in Iraq. Isn't that ironic. We kill him but then we radiate the battlefiled ourselves with tons of Depleted Uranium weapons. Our own troops are dying from this and getting extremely sick. Cancer and other illnesses. Still think the war is worth it?

So we have decided to take the Iranian situation into our own hands. Since they won't cease on the nuclear ENERGY developement we have started ASSASINATING IRANIAN SCIENTISTS!!! Just recently they blew one up with a car bomb. Gee what is the word for that???? OOOO yeah TERRORISM! We are the terrorists! Terrorizing the entire world.

As if this wasn't enough the US governemnt reached into its bag of tricks and pulled outthe o so popular 9-11 card. That's right. You didn't know. Iran was behind 9-11 now!! Haha. That is funny. If you have not seen it yet you must see the Iranian president standing up a I think it was a UN meeting and he tells everyone how much of a scam 9-11 was. The American diplomats not wanting to have to answer to any of it, got up and walked out of the meeting!

We also have the situation a few months back we once again trying to get into a war we told everyone that the Iranian's actually hired an assasin who was part of the Mexican Drug Cartels we ship guns to, to actually assasinate a Saudi ambassador on US Soil. Totally bogus claim and the cartel that supposedly was contacted, the guy turned out to be an FBI informant. How convienent.

Now should also mention we have been meddling in their afairs for over 60 years! In 1953 the CIA staged terror attacks and a propaganda campaign against the people of Iran. We gunned down civilians, blew up school buses and mosques! Then we blamed it on Muhammed Mossadeq and even dropped pamphlets thru the air. Down with Allah, up with Mossadeq. This started a successful coup and he was removed.

Still wonder why so many people have a distain for Americans?

We have been trying to drag Iran into war desperately. We will keep trying. Don't buy into any of the BS floated out by the media. They are not developing nukes,they want to remain a sovereign nation and stay financially independent and that is the main reason we want to attack them. Whenever your nations finances aren't controlled by a central controlling bank which I believe are under control of the Vatican but it maybe the Rothchild's as some would say well, then they send NATO after you.

I have attached a couple of videos I'd like you to check out. The first one here is a great interview of the Iranian preident. You need to listen to this. They ask him how he feels about the way they potray him in the western media as a war monger and a terrorist. You need to hear his answer! He makes a great point. If Iran was this aggresive war hungry nation you would see Iranian forces in all other countries over the world. You can not name me one of those countries because they do not exist. Iran is not in any other country. We know who is.

Here is a brief timeline of events that we STAGED to draw us into war. 1941 We knew the Japanese we coming. We even knew the date and time of the attack.After Pearl Harbor we were in the war1964 The Gulf of Tonkin incident - We staged an attack on our own ships in waters next to Vietnam. We blamed it on them even though they never fired on us , even after being fired at first. After this "attack" we were fully in the Vietnam War... 1991 We stage a news conference with a "nurse" who states Iraqi soldiers were leaving babies on the floor to die at a hospital. Then we were in Desert Storm. Trying to oust a dictator we put in place and armed to fued with Iran!2001 9-11. This gets no justice in a quick mention so please read my blog on 9-11 as well but to make a long story short we blamed Osama Bin Laden for the attacks when it was totally impossible for him to have done what they said. The US staged this event to rol out their plan to take over the whole mid east. This event not only drew us into the Afghan War but it drove us into endless words. They have a new catchphrase, Terrorism. When in fact the terrorists don't wear turbins. They were 3 piece suits and work at places like Bank of America, Halliburton, Monsanto, the CIA, etc.................Since this event they use it as an excuse for everything. Not only invading nation after nation unjustly, but also its used as an excuse to strip us of any liberties they see fit. It's the ultimate fear monger tactic.. To read my 9-11 piece exposing the hoax click here!

2003 Iraq. Just two years after 9-11 We invaded Iraq. The public did not support it at first like the establishment thought they would. They tried to blame Iraq even though there was not a single Iraqi involved in the attacks. They tried to say Al Queda was training in Iraq. No one bought that either. Then he said Saddamm had WMDs even though the inspectors found no evidence of such. Iraq was on the short list on nations who didn't have their finances run by a central controlling(Rothchild or Vatican)bank. The terror list Fox news shows you,with the worst terror states in the world? It goes or it went I should say like this "Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Lebanon, N Korea" . The list of nations left in the world that are not controlled by a central bank is a very short list. Here it is "Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Lebanon, N Korea, Cuba" Sound familiar? Its the same list. They are not terror nations. They are our next targets for among other reason, finances. If you say its for oil or resources you are not wrong, but the most important agenda to them in many cases is running their economy so they can play with the numbers on a global scale. Being financially independent is what is saving some countries from ending up like Greece!

2011 Libya . This time they used a different strategy. It is very common now. It's called an attack under the guise of a humanitarian intervention. We cause some sort of chaos and then we act like the heroes bringing in the military to stop whatever forces when in fact it was us all along and we just blamed another regime for attacking its own people when it wasn't true. This is such a common method now. You see it all the time. In Libya's case not only were they financially independent but he was going to put the whole country on a gold backed currency called the Dinar. As a matter of fact Ghadafi was going to place the ENTIRE CONTINENT OF AFRICA on it. He was backing it with almost 100 billion of his own money. The US couldn't let him do that, especially since in my opinion they will be in Africa for many years tapping it dry of its resources. It will be our new middle east. We couldn't have our dollar be obsolete in all those markets. So we went on the news and told everyone that he was actually killing his own civilians with his Air Force. So here comes the heros with the "humanitarian intervention". There was nothing to intervene on! It never happened. Russian satelites and tons of witnesses on the ground and lack of ANY evidence confirms that. A few months later Ghadafi was out. Another coup in the mideast led by us, just like Egypt.

I could give you many many more examples of this. Actually the hard thing would be finding an attack that was legit and unprovoked against us. So as you see on the news how Iran did this or Iran did that, don't buy into any of it. As a matter of fact we are assasinating their scientists right now! Just killed one and injured 2 others with a car bomb. What does that sound like to you? Terrorism right? This is being done by Mossad and the CIA and MEK. Those are the terrorists.

The things I have said here are 100 percent true. Please look into them. Now that you know how unjust these wars are, I want you to see this video. US Marines standing over Afghans they killed, which is bad enough but they are pissing on them! Yes urinating on the dead bodies and having a good time doing it. This is despicable and while we are at war these people still represent you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a4UPPaHbhkYNow with that being said anyone that knows me knows I support the troops 100%. Supporting the troops does not mean you have to support the unjust wars! I want them to stay home and stay healthy for their families and themselves. It is the people calling the shots I blame. Yes in this case these marines are despicable, but to some extent that blame needs to fall on the bureaucrats who made them go occupy other people's land and train them to be ruthless killers. I believe in all honesty that 90 percent of the troops believing they ARE FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM. The brainwashers and spin doctors got to them already just like the media got to most of you. I think there are only like 5% that know what we are doing is so wrong yet they don't care. Then I think there is another 5% that know the truth. That we are the aggressor attacking all these peaceful nations, but they are trapped. They can't go AWOL, but they know. It eats away at them everyday and to those brave men I say thank you. We know you tried to do the right thing. When you get home do your part and speak out against these attricities so we can shed some light on the matter and bring the war criminals to justice. There are millions of lives at risk here. Who's next after Iran? Syria? N. Korea? When will it end? There is no need for ANY of these wars. No one wants a piece of us. They aren't lining up to attack us even though that's what Uncle Sam wants you to think. We are constantly attacking ourselves to draw us into any war we want. WHY? $$$. There is a ton of $$$ to be made of war. It is also huge in getting elected officials a higher approval rate and backing for any legislation they want to push through. Just look at the Patriot Act or the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011. They would never have been able to even propoe these unamerican pieces of legislature 11 years ago, but 9-11 they have been able to do anything they want! They spy on us, track us, lock us up for absurd sentences even for things like videotaping the police. These are all results of these wars.

The people in Iran, Syria, Yemen and anywhere else are just like you and I. They love their children. They go to work to hopefully be able to pay all their bills. Some of them watch sports or danciing with the stars. Other read books. Some like shopping. None of them want to blow you up. See there are positive things you can take out of this blog. You should know that the world is not nearly as scary of a place as they want you to believe. People don't want to take down skyscrapers with people in them, they don't want to explode your car or any of that. They just want to be free and we are all victims of our oppressive and/or corrupt governments. They are trying to censor us from speaking with people in these regions. I have talked with a few people in these nations and not only do they not want our "help". None of the stuff we here is going on over there is, no government killing protestors or kidnapping people. Turn off the television. It totally warps your perception on reality. Thank you for reading this blog. We touched on a lot of things but if you are thirsting for more, check out the rest of our blogs. We have not only myself but also Justin Cooke and Mike Dammann. Two excellent writers with a lot of good material. It's all up @ http://www.therealnewsonline.com/our-blogs.htmland if you use RSS Feeds here is ours http://www.therealnewsonline.com/2/feed

That is the link and RSS to all of our blogs. You can click on any tag word on the right to find an article about that within our blogs, or you can select an author by clicking his pic or name.

﻿Brian S Staveley﻿﻿isthe founder and creator of both The Real News Online and The Dose Of Reality Radio Show. Brian began researching these matters in late 2010 and launched his first of several radio ventures shortly after. Brian also produces all the radio shows on this network as well as the work on the website. His main areas of research would be media fakery, govt. and media hoaxes, false flags, 9/11, NASA, Flat Earth, Scientism, Mandela Effect, and more.

RIPJustin​Cooke

_﻿Justin Cooke﻿is
also an in depth researcher of truth in all areas
while specializing in The Illuminati, The Occult, secret societies, 911, symbolism,
natural health issues, Co-Intelpro, the wars in the Middle East and much more! Justin also Co-Hosts Dose Of Reality Radio.

James Sloan

﻿James Sloan﻿﻿ is a 9/11 researcher who has been in the game now for close to a decade. James also researches many other topics such as health issues, social issues, and other lies told to us by the mainstream. His primary focus is 9/11 though. He also is a host on The Dose Of Reality Radio Show right here on The Real News Online.Com﻿