Using the unscientific argument in the campaigns against animal experiments is speciesism. Non humans’ suffer is the strongest case against vivisection, a fact that is almost absent in the anti vivisection movement.
Vivisection is bad science but more importantly it is bad ethics.
Using animals hurts humans but first of all using animals hurts animals.

Because the system is corrupted, because it is a waste of money, because scientists look for prestige not for cures, because scientists become emotionally apathetic, because it is unscientific…
Everything but not the truth. Everything but not what really bothers you, what is really important to you... animals’ suffer.
Have you ever thought why you keep searching for side ways to say something so simple?
The suffer argument will never work you say?
Well don’t you think that if it is so obvious that it won’t work, that you try to convince the whole scientific community to totally change direction, sometimes with a knowledge that sums with reading a few leaflets, says something about the chances for a real change in society?

It is a moral issue not a scientific one. If you have reached the point that you hang on the few doctors that go against animal experiments as your best case against vivisection, then the animals have a problem that no alternative could solve.
Problems should be solved from the roots and the root is an historical crime against weaker creatures in an excuse of human superiority. The problem is in the way humans see animals not in the way scientists see science.

Please watch/read the following multimedia article for more details:
[url=http://www.only-one-solution.net/multimedia-articles/the_suffer_argument.html
]http://www.only-one-solution.net/multimedia-articles/the_suffer_argument.html[/url]