SUBSCRIBE:

Tunisian rapper Weld El 15 sentenced to prison again

Share

In March 2013, Weld El 15 released a video for his song “Cops Are Dogs” containing a montage of scenes showing the police hitting people

Facebook/Weld El 15

A criminal court sentenced two Tunisian rappers to prison on August 30, 2013, for “insulting the police,” Human Rights Watch said today. The sentences of a year and nine months in prison, which violate their right to free expression, are the latest in a string of similar prosecutions.

The First Instance Criminal Tribunal of Hammamet, a northern coastal city, convicted the two rappers, Alaa Eddine Yaakoubi, better known as Weld El 15 (“The 15-Year-Old Boy” in Tunisian Arabic), and Klay BBJ, of “insulting the police,” defamation of public officials, and harming public morals. The two were not notified of the trial in advance and were not in the courtroom.

“Sending artists, journalists, and bloggers to prison for critical words and images is hardly worthy of the new Tunisia,” said Joe Stork, acting Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “Authorities should be getting rid of these laws from the old repressive era instead of using them to silence critics.”

The charges against the two rappers stem from their performance on August 22 at the International Festival of Hammamet, which included a song critical of the police. Shortly after the performance, police assaulted the two rappers, arrested and held them for several hours, and then released them pending an investigation. They were convicted a week later by the First Instance Tribunal of Hammamet. The charges were brought under articles 125, 128, and 240 of the penal code.

Another court had convicted Weld El 15 on July 2 on similar charges.

The two rappers went into hiding. Their lawyer told Human Rights Watch that they plan to appeal the decision.

Human Rights Watch reviewed a 17-minute video of the festival events filmed by Emine Mtiraoui, a journalist from the Nawaat news website. At the beginning of the video, Klay BBJ and Weld El 15 perform rap songs with two other rappers. After the show, the video shows police agents going backstage to arrest the two rappers.

The same video shows Weld El 15 at the emergency section of the Hammamet hospital, with several bruises on the face, neck, and right arm. Weld El 15 says on-camera that police officers beat him with their batons in the van en route to the police station. Ghazi Mrabet, the rappers' lawyer, confirmed to Human Rights Watch that police officers beat his two clients on the trip from the festival to the central police station in Hammamet, and said that they have medical certificates proving their injuries.

He also said that they did not receive a summons to attend their trial, as the code of criminal procedure requires, and that he heard about their conviction through social media.

In March, Weld El 15 released a video for his song “Cops Are Dogs” containing a montage of scenes showing the police hitting people. The First Instance Court of Manouba initially sentenced him to two years in prison, also in absentia, as he went into hiding. He later surrendered and asked to have the case reopened. On July 2, the Appeals Court of Tunis reduced his sentence to six months, suspended.

Article 125 of the Tunisian penal code punishes by up to one year in prison anyone who insults a public servant in the course of the performance of the person's duties. Article 128 provides for up to two years in prison for defamation of public officials, and article 226 prohibits hampering public morality or decency through acts or words. Since the Tunisian revolution in 2011, authorities have repeatedly used these and other repressive laws of the previous government to prosecute speech they consider objectionable. The National Constituent Assembly, which is also the legislature, has made no move to abolish these laws.

Since early 2012, judicial authorities have prosecuted numerous journalists, bloggers, artists, and intellectuals for peaceful expression. In September 2012, for example, a public prosecutor brought charges against two sculptors for artwork deemed harmful to public order and good morals. On March 28, 2012, the First Instance Criminal Tribunal of Mahdia sentenced two bloggers to prison terms of seven-and-a-half years, confirmed on appeal, for writings perceived as offensive to Islam. One is in prison while the second escaped and obtained asylum in France.

On May 29, 2013, the military court of Sfax, in southeastern Tunisia, tried Hakim Ghanmi on charges of “undermining the reputation of the army,” “defamation of a public official,” and “disturbing others through public communication networks,” over a letter to the defense minister he published on his blog, Warakat Tounsia, in April. In the letter, he complained about the actions of the director of the military hospital in Gabes. On August 23, the public prosecutor brought charges against Mourad Mehrezi, a cameraman who filmed an incident in which a protester threw an egg at the minister of culture. The charges included conspiracy to assault a public servant and harming public morals.

International standards prohibit applying the notion of defamation to state bodies and institutions. Governments and their institutions should not be able to file defamation suits or have such suits filed on their behalf. In his April 20, 2010 report, the UN special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue, stated: “Criminal defamation laws may not be used to protect abstract or subjective notions or concepts, such as the State, national symbols, national identity, cultures, schools of thought, religions, ideologies, or political doctrines.”

This is consistent with the view, supported by the special rapporteur, that international human rights law protects individuals and groups of people, not abstract notions or institutions that are subject to scrutiny, comment, or criticism.

The Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression, and Access to Information, a set of principles that many experts agree upon and is widely used, states in principle 7(b):

No one may be punished for criticizing or insulting the nation, the state or its symbols, the government, its agencies or public officials, or a foreign nation state or its symbols, government, agency, or public official unless the criticism or insult was intended and likely to incite imminent violence.

“Tunisian authorities need to stop prosecuting people for offending state institutions, even if what they say seems crude,” Stork said. “They should also abolish penal code provisions that provide prison terms for defamation and vaguely worded offenses such as harming 'public morals' and 'public order.'”

After already cracking down on freedom of information in recent years, President Erdoğan has taken advantage of the abortive coup d’état and the state of emergency in effect since 20 July to silence many more of his media critics, not only Gülen movement media and journalists but also, to a lesser extent, Kurdish, secularist and left-wing media.

This publication presents the findings of the media development assessment in Mongolia that began in 2012 to determine the state of the media in the country. The assessment was based on the UNESCO/IPDC Media Development Indicators (MDIs), an internationally recognized analytical tool used to provide detailed overviews of national media landscapes and related media development priorities.

“After the initial optimism during the Euromaidan movement, many journalists have become disillusioned. They are faced with the triple challenge of the war in the Eastern part of the country, the economic crisis and the digitalization of mass media.”

An officer of the Myanmar army recently filed a criminal complaint against two journalists for allegedly sowing disunity among the military. Even though mediation by the Press Council caused the military to withdraw the case, this incident demonstrates how the military continues to throw its weight to get back at what it perceives as negative publicity.

The government uses draconian laws such as the sedition provisions of the penal code, the criminal defamation law, and laws dealing with hate speech to silence dissent. These laws are vaguely worded, overly broad, and prone to misuse, and have been repeatedly used for political purposes against critics at the national and state level.

In recent years, the space afforded to civil society to operate freely has been shrinking dramatically across the world, presenting a serious threat to democracy and human rights. Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA) have been especially badly affected by this shrinking political space.

The report is a frank assessment of the recent regime of online censorship and mass surveillance against a backdrop of longstanding, serious abuses of the judicial process and attacks on freedom of expression by Turkish authorities.

The report surveys the rocky landscape for media and public discourse since the ruling military junta lifted the curtain on the southeast Asian nation in 2012 after five decades of isolation from the modern world.

With the environment now recognized as a major challenge for humankind, Reporters Without Borders believes that particular attention should be paid to the journalists who take greats risk to investigate sensitive, environment-related subjects. The report highlights a steady deterioration in the situation for environmental reporters, who are increasingly exposed to many kinds of pressure, threats and violence.

The Pakistani government has significantly expanded its communication interception activities. This Privacy International report covers the intelligence services plan to capture all IP-traffic in Pakistan and other initiatives, pointing to gaps in the laws governing surveillance.

The need to regulate the transfer of surveillance technologies that pose a risk to human rights has been largely recognised by EU institutions and some EU member states. It is no longer a question of if the EU should do more in this area, but how.

Defamation and insult remain criminal offences in Portugal punishable by up to two years behind bars despite the fact that a number of international human rights bodies have found criminal defamation to be a disproportionate restriction on freedom of expression.

Despite its Constitutional commitment to free speech, India’s legal system makes it surprisingly easy to silence others. Routine corruption, inefficiency, and the selective enforcement of vague and overbroad laws allow individuals, or small groups, to censor opinions they find distasteful. - See more at: http://www.pen-international.org/the-india-report-executive-summary-and-key-findings/#sthash.TIIM2xbu.dpuf

Press freedom in the Philippines continued to be under attack from 2014 to 2015. The killing of journalists is continuing, with four journalists killed from May 2014 to May 2015. The trial of the accused masterminds of the Ampatuan (Maguindanao) Massacre and their supposed henchmen is continuing, but with a primary accused was released, while a witness in the same case was killed.

The year 2014 saw Malaysians standing up to exercise the rights guaranteed under the Federal Constitution, including freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. This continues a growing trend of facing up to state oppression. Unfortunately, this has been met with increasing repression. Malaysia has seen a concerted crackdown on the freedom of expression in the year 2014, which has escalated even further in 2015.

IFEX publishes original and member-produced free expression news and reports. Some member content has been edited by IFEX. We invite you to contact [email protected] to request permission to reproduce or republish in whole or in part content from this site.