On behalf of SillyDog701, it is my honour to express our warmest welcome to you. SillyDog701 is a very informative and friendly community, and I sincerely hope that you will enjoy your membership here at SillyDog701.

In case you were not aware, SillyDog701 is a very open minded environment. We don't ban users, or substitute words like "goofy mutt", "daffy duck" for "silly dog".

And just a kind reminder, due to the recent cybersquatting issue (*), the correct URL for SillyDog701 is http://sillydog.org/

(*) We are resolving the cybersquatting issue, and I am sure the issue will be concluded shortly.

For those who followed the case of [sdp=56680]UFAQ.org cybersquatted SillyDog701[/sdp], you should be able notice a new member - DrDean - recently joined up, posted nowhere but only in [sdp=56680]that thread[/sdp] and constantly suggest me to take Jay Garcia's sanctimonious offer, however, he refused to acknowledge Mr Jay Garcia's cybersquatting behaviour or comment on Mr Garcia's unreasonable demand of me to apologise to someone who cybersquatted me.

Yes, I am posting from the same IP address as I am a client of his AND his brother Stephen. I graduated from Tulane Medical School in New Orleans and am very close friends with Stephen Garcia who at the time was the Mac IT person at Tulane Medical School and have been a client of Jay and Stephen on their server for many years. That's all you need to know.

And, by the way, English isn't my native language, neither is French.

Also, if you know anything about VPN then you know why I have the same IP address.

DrDean, MD - Clinical Psychology

Please remove my account as I no longer wish to be part of this board.

You know, I haven't seen a case of website rivalry in a long, long time... and I think I speak for everybody when saying that this is really, really sad.

When I read the first page, I was thinking everything was pretty much resolved and such but boy was I wrong.

I agree, the tactics used by the other Netscape FAQ site aren't good; hell, they're not even ethical... but why squabble over it so much? Get the problem taken care of rather than stir more trouble up, stick it to the past and move forward.

I just don't understand what the competition over who's best... provide a service and be the best you can be, you know? (And don't make false claims either... )

You're right of course, both of you, and I sincerely apologize for carrying this on as long as it did. However, I got lost in the moment finding the need to defend Jay, the brother of a very close friend and colleague in the field of Psychology.

Also, the reference to being paranoid wasn't an insult but rather a diagnosis that shouldn't have been aired in public as regards my credentials as MD in Pathology and PhD in Clinical Psychology. Again, a sincere apology in that regard.

Unfortunately this won't be the end of the matter, at least as far as Mr Shen is concerned.

DrDean wrote:And, by the way, English isn't my native language, neither is French.

and

DrDean wrote:BTW: My native language is Croatian.

Sure.We know you don't speak English well, except you just speak as good as Mr Jay Garcia. No better, no worse.

DrDean wrote:And by your comment I see you know absolutely nothing about Virtual Private Networks where users on board show the same IP address.

I know a lot more in networking than Mr Jay Garcia and Mr Jay Garcia's fictional identity DrDean.

AlsoSince you praised everything Jay Garcia said and did, that's fine. I simply award you a special title, in "Jay Garcia's language."
(a screenshot from domains cybersquatted by Jay Garcia, highlight added by me.)

for those who are confusedAn email account "daffy duck" was used to registered to SillyDog701 Message Centre, too bad, he forgot to enable that account (bounced back).
Allowed me to remind everybody about the "goofy mutt" issue.
Mr Jay Garcia publicly denied that even with the evidence from Google cache. And in private email exchange in Nov 2004 as well.

Mr Jay Garcia only recently admitted it but blamed to a fictional Admin, further Mr Jay Garcia's fictional identity DrDean, had no other comments but "funny".

Re: An email account "daffy duck" was used to registered to SillyDog701 Message Centre, too bad, he forgot to enable that account (bounced back)

Never ending stupidity !! If the email address was fake or disabled or whatever your story is now, then HOW did I receive the authorization link via email using THAT email address ??? Can't wait to see this answer because the email address is valid. But then again maybe you're "banned" again ..

DrDean wrote:Re: An email account "daffy duck" was used to registered to SillyDog701 Message Centre, too bad, he forgot to enable that account (bounced back)

Never ending stupidity !! If the email address was fake or disabled or whatever your story is now, then HOW did I receive the authorization link via email using THAT email address ??? Can't wait to see this answer because the email address is valid. But then again maybe you're "banned" again ..

Good try, Mr Garcia,

I guess I have to reveal more, I received following feedback:

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted byDrDean (daffy.duck@******.com) on Monday, May 09, 2005 at 10:39:05---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gender: Male

Occupation: Doctor

Age: 77

Country: USA

How_come: Friend

site_URL: Don't Have One

Platform: Win2000/NT

Browser:: Others

SD701_Rank: it's ok.

Like: archives

Dislike: non-technical chit chat

Message_Body: Have not received confirmation email yet, been over 24 hrs. Emailaddress may appear to be "funny" but it's valid.

Me being banned?
It just further proving that you (DrDean) is in fact Jay Garcia.
You've been trying hard (but not enough) on saying that you are not Jay Garcia. Then, what's your "daffy duck" to do with me being banned again by Mr Jay Garcia?

And when I receive the email I'll be glad to post the header information.

Oh and by the way, shortly after I wrote the feedback I did indeed receive the confirmation. You need to answer that question Antony, "how did I receive the confirmation if the email address is not valid" ??? But I can guess what you're answer is to that one anyway. And, do you always post private feedback? I'm sure your "guests" need to know your privacy policy a little better.

Re: Me being banned again ??

You seem to forget that it was YOU that posted that in one of your earlier tirades. I'm just bringing it up again as an afterthought as a possibility.

DrDean wrote:Oh and by the way, shortly after I wrote the feedback I did indeed receive the confirmation. You need to answer that question Antony, "how did I receive the confirmation if the email address is not valid" ???

Because you sent me feedback, and I copied the activation code back to you.

From those bounced emails, for a period of time, a number of notifications or emails sending from servers have been bounced back. Anyone who runs a server should know this very well, and it is very easy to change the setting.

DrDean wrote:Re: Me being banned again ??

You seem to forget that it was YOU that posted that in one of your earlier tirades. I'm just bringing it up again as an afterthought as a possibility.