Those Medieval writers sure love their long sentences. Usually when translating a such a sentence, I get totally lost in the thicket of phrases. I end up trying to diagram the sentence, which often helps, but sometimes I cannot determine where some phrases connect. Here is an example. This is Trithemius in the Preface to the Steganographia, talking about how his art of hiding messages could be used for raunchy purposes:

What I have so far. I put in bold the verbs (as well as some particles) where I think they connect the phrases. I've broken the sentence down into subsentences for my own sanity:

1. Also, by publishing this knowledge among the base folks, not upholding loyalty between persons having been joined into marriage by sacrament, one may now hereafter have an affair:

2. Provided that a wife (although thus far not knowing Latin diction) is to realize a wicked and unchaste plan and intention of an adulterous lover (that is, a fornicator) (by chaste, honest, and most holy words of whatever language or idiom currently adequately learned), even though her husband bears the letters as well as praises her extensively as the most honest...

3. He would be able to reply with his desire to her in the same way, as widely and as copiously as preferred, most secretly, by the same or some other beautiful and sufficiently completely ornate series (of what? words?).

fides is the subject of maneret and is modified by tuta and contracta.

And marital faith, bound together by sacrament, henceforth would no longer remain among couples once the knowledge (of this skill) is made known to wicked folk: as long as the wife, although unskilled in Latin speech to this point, through words chaste, honest and very holy of whatever language or speech she now knows well enough, is able to understand very broadly the wicked and impure intent and thought of her adulterous lover or fornicator, even though her husband is bringing the letters and praising them as the best, and she can return her desire in the same way, as widely and as fully as she wants, to him (the lover) very safely, with the same or other letters, in a beautiful and sufficiently elaborate arrangement.

I believe this is pretty close to the meaning.uxor is the subject of possetposset is the main verb, used once with intellegere and once with remandere.Apologies for a few poor English vocab choices. Don't have my dictionary in Canada.

The only thing we can guarantee when communicating via the internet is that we will be almost completely misunderstood, and likely cause great offence in doing so. Throw in an attempt at humour and you insure a lifelong enemy will be made.

That's really excellent work! A question, though: I'm having a tough time understanding how tuta inter coniugatos fides contracta sacramento becomes "marital faith, bound together by sacrament, among couples". How is tuta modifying fides if there is a phrase in between? Or, how can *I* learn to detect when that is the case, instead of trying to fit the words into separate phrases?

Furthermore, how does one get the idea that posset modifies intelligere as well as remandare?

I teach my students to work until they find a verb. I teach them to look for markers of subclauses, such as cum, ubi, qui, ut etc, and if they don't find any of these to keep looking for the main verb. In this sentence, posset is the only verb. Since intelligere and remandere are infinitives it makes sense that they must be dependent on posset, as there is no other possibility. Furthermore, it makes sense. Also, the que on suumque, immediately following the first infinitive, serves as punctuation in Latin, giving a further indication that we have just finished the first of two ideas, governed by infinitives.

LAtin word order is not always the same, as we all know well, but it often follows rules better than seems obvious.

Safe, between couples, faith, bound by sacrament, no longer remains, is how Yoda would say it.LAtin typically interrupts a noun and an adjective with a participial or some other phrase. Logically, the word order here makes perfect sense. tuta is placed emphatically as it is the key word. inter coniugatos comes next, between tuta and fides, as it describes the exact type of fides that will no longer remain safe. Furthemore it creates a word picture 'inter coniugatos' placed between tuta and fides. Finally, contracta sacramento finishes the idea of the faith, a further description, emphasising the sacredness of the faith, and heightening the sense of danger that this skill of hiding meaning in words poses. Next comes an ablative absolute phrase, which is tried in meaning to the final verb. Finally the verb. Remove all the trappings and you have a simple sentence. nec fides iam maneret.

Again, it comes down to the verb. Only a verb, or some form of conjunction, can normally separate ideas. Since there is only one verb in this first sentence, and no conjunctions, everything else must fit together somehow.

It also helps to know that fides is feminine!

Mind you, this was by no means an easy sentence, but it does follow general rules.

The only thing we can guarantee when communicating via the internet is that we will be almost completely misunderstood, and likely cause great offence in doing so. Throw in an attempt at humour and you insure a lifelong enemy will be made.

Thank you for the helpful hints, especially on infinitives. I've found that I can whip through easily some of the sentences which are just as long, but there are a few characteristics which trip me up, and the infinitives were one of them