At some point we have to expect Spiller to be healthy and cut into Fred's production, while CJ?K has a very nice schedule coming out of the bye and ending with a week 16 tilt against the Jags.

Antonio Brown is a clear upgrade over Williams (and every WR on your roster, frankly) b/c of his target numbers alone. Williams may not lose his spot to Austin but he's never going to be more than the number 3 target in that passing game. Brown is the clear #1.

Wow . . . every single player has a terrible match up. That sucks. I'd play the hot hand in Jones. NE D is hurting without Wilfork / Mayo / Talib so I'd play Sanders. Coin flip the third spot? I'd probably roll with Torrey but against Haden I'd temper my expectations.

Tolbert at RB. Stewart is out another week and I have no interest playing a RB vs. the Jets, let alone a time share RB.

I would still have to go with Witten, although I went back and forth several times. The main reason is the QB situation in Cleveland, Jason Campbell played well last week, but that's largely in part to an absolute stellar job by the whole team. I don't trust him on a week to week basis.

Witten may not produce every week, but I'd still take his chances with Tony Romo at QB

I like Wright but I'd have a hard time starting him over Brown. Brown has been pretty consistently awesome in PPR this year. He has been targeted over 10 times in five of seven games this year, I think.

Hmmmm . . . I'd feel a whole lot better starting Brown. The Steelers aren't running the ball well and the Patriots DST is beaten up and not doing a very good job stopping anybody right now. Brown is far more reliable w/a very consistent amount of targets.

Quote:

Originally Posted by abaddon41_80

I like Wright but I'd have a hard time starting him over Brown. Brown has been pretty consistently awesome in PPR this year. He has been targeted over 10 times in five of seven games this year, I think.

Standard scoring, pick one.

Stacy vs. Ten
Bernard @Mia
Fred Jackson vs. KC

Stacy, assuming he's healthy. In fact, I'd order them just as you have typed them up.

All but Pryor are free to be signed right now, Pryor is on WW and that won't process until Saturday. So if I want him and for some reason someone else grabs him, I'd be forced to likely start Locker since Dalton would have already played.

I don't think Dalton will get close to the 24 he's been averaging, but he still could get 18-20. I really think now that the Titans have Greene back they're going to run the ball more effectively.

1st World Dynasty League problems, but who do you see as being a better dynasty league keeper Josh Gordon or Justin Blackmon? I like Gordon's talent, but I like the possibility of Blackmon playing with Bridgewater next year. Whomever I keep I'll likely trade the other.

All but Pryor are free to be signed right now, Pryor is on WW and that won't process until Saturday. So if I want him and for some reason someone else grabs him, I'd be forced to likely start Locker since Dalton would have already played.

I don't think Dalton will get close to the 24 he's been averaging, but he still could get 18-20. I really think now that the Titans have Greene back they're going to run the ball more effectively.

I think I'm leaning Dalton, is that the right play?

Big Ben? Pats D is in shambles.

From those options, I'd roll with Locker. I think they are pretty even and give the edge to Locker based on rushing yards.

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmarq83

1st World Dynasty League problems, but who do you see as being a better dynasty league keeper Josh Gordon or Justin Blackmon? I like Gordon's talent, but I like the possibility of Blackmon playing with Bridgewater next year. Whomever I keep I'll likely trade the other.

Ditto for T. Richardson or Andre Ellington

Do you only keep a small number of players? It seems more keeper than dynasty if you have to make choices like these.

I'd go Gordon, but they're really even. The 1.5 year age difference was the tie break.

Ouch on Richardson vs. Ellington. If Trent can't get any better over the rest of the season w/Indy then he has to be let go for Ellington.

Do you only keep a small number of players? It seems more keeper than dynasty if you have to make choices like these.

I'd go Gordon, but they're really even. The 1.5 year age difference was the tie break.

Ouch on Richardson vs. Ellington. If Trent can't get any better over the rest of the season w/Indy then he has to be let go for Ellington.

It's a 10 team league. The problem is that 5 owners really know what we're doing, and it's been a dynasty league for a few years, so we've completely stacked our teams to the point where 75% of the elite talent is on 5 teams

I want to change back to a 2 keeper league because it's losing some of it's fun with only half of the teams capable of winning, but the rest of the league disagrees. Not really my problem though because my team is outrageously stacked.