> On Oct. 1, 2014, 5:42 p.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/async/AsyncModule.java, line 161
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26232/diff/1/?file=710137#file710137line161>
> >
> > We also need time-based retention. How about 1 month by default?
>
> Maxim Khutornenko wrote:
> Thought about that but was not sure the extra complexity is worth it.
> Also, don't we want to show update history in the UI regardless of how old it
> is?
>
> Bill Farner wrote:
> Given that it currently needs to fit in memory, i think not.
>
> For example: if i create a job to test something out, then kill it and
> never return. Probably shouldn't retain those updates forever.