04 December 2011

As we have seen, white people's criminality has varied greatly over time and space. W.A. Bonger in the 1940s walked us through Jewish, Mediterranean, Alpine, Nordic, Ugro-Finn, and Dinaric (Slavic) crime rates from his time period. Such differences, we've argued, are nothing to wring one's hands over, but a simple reality for policy-makers to take into account.

Similarly, for as long as Africans and Europeans have co-existed on North American soil, these two admittedly large and diverse groups have, in the aggregate, shown markedly different criminal tendencies. The differences seem to be getting more and more marked, and it has become conservative dogma that post-1960s Great Society programs are to blame.

This is true to a point. As we've seen, any human can be incentivized to be parasitic, be he the son of West Africans or Albion'sseed.

But long before public welfare handouts were even a twinkle in LBJ's eye, Afros and Euros committed crime differently in America. How differently?