Starved by blocking bank accounts (2015 -)

Since 2005 I have been plaintiff in a court case against my employer ABN AMRO. On September 16, 2014 the higher court (Gerechtshof) finally ruled that ABN AMRO should pay me my overdue salary, which was around 600,000 euro gross, increased with compensation for my costs in the law suit, or an estimated 350,000 euro net, see (in Dutch): [url]http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2014:4060[/url]
My attorney Van Woudenberg (law firm Keizerhof) resigned on October 3, because she didn´t want to make ABN AMRO pay. On October 6 I sent my own letter asking ABN AMRO to pay me 600,000 euro gross. To my surprise in October and November 2014 ABN AMRO paid me around 240,000 euro.
At this time I thought I was financially secure, but was obviously wrong...
On February 23, 2015 I agreed that attorney Eisenberger (law firm HRE advocaten) would represent me in making ABN AMRO pay me also the rest of the money they own me. On February 26, Eisenberger sent a letter to ABN AMRO, asking for my overdue salary. On March 30 I mailed Eisenberger asking to take action as agreed. He replied that he quit because I do not trust him (true indeed: only a complete idiot trusts a lawyer).
On April 2, Eisenberger sent me his “decreased” bill for an amount of 4266 euro. On April 15 I objected to the bill, because: he had not done anything for me and the hours were unreasonably high. On April 16, I received a new bill for 16 ½ hours at 5410 euro (for a total of 1 letter). On May 10 HRE advocaten replied by mail to my letter of April 15, stating he had read it with dismay and would submit the dispute to the Court.
On May 14, Eisenberger requested the court to confiscate (conservatior beslag) all the credit on my payment account under Rabobank Nederland and overdue salary with ABN AMRO, for a debt of 7873 euro. On May 15, Judge Mr. Drs. A.P. Schoonbrood-Wessels approved the request of Eisenberger for an estimated debt of 7033 euro for all the credit on my payment account. Schoonbrood-Wessels presides over the court that rules on (the complaints against) attorneys (“Raad van Discipline”). After discussing the matter with the dean (deken), on June 1 Eisenberger sent the decision of May 15 at writ by his bailiff Van der Meer Philipsen to Rabobank.
Only on June 2, Eisenberger informed me of his (criminal) actions. On June 3, 2015 Rabobank sent me a letter that not only my payment account was blocked, but also my savings account.

ATTORNEY NR. 3 – PALTHE OBERMAN
On June 12 and 15, 2015 I made a deal with attorney Hillebrandt (law firm Palthe Oberman to represent me. To lift the confiscation, there were two options (“art. 705 Rv”): 1) the blocking is unsound or 2) provide security.
Hillebrandt could’ve proven that the confiscation is unsound, but didn’t even try. Hillebrandt didn´t offer security, then asked another provisional judge to rule (in Kort geding). Predictably the judge on July 6 ruled that the confiscation would not be lifted.
In the meanwhile Eisenberger on July 6 filed a second request to the court to confiscate (conservatior beslag) all the credit on my savings account under Rabobank (because the first confiscation was unsound), for a debt of 20,756 euro. This request was approved for a total amount of 7033 euro on July 8, of which I was informed by writ of the bailiff on July 10.
Since then I sent mails to several attorneys, one attorney promised to solve the blocking of my bank accounts within 2 weeks on October 30 and resigned on November 13, 2015.

FOOD
Food - On June 29, 2015 I contacted my personal doctor (huisarts) to help me. He answered he wouldn’t help me, but when I persisted he asked the debt counselling of the city of Amsterdam to help me. The debt counselling told my doctor they would help, but – of course – didn’t. The debt counselling arranged food from the Food bank (Voedselbank), that on July 3 gave me POISONED food.
I also asked help from organisations like the Salvation Army. Basically there are several “charities” that do not really help the homeless, but provide them with food. On July 15, one of these organisations gave me a list of places where I could get food for free. To my surprise since then I ate enough to get back some of my weight loss. On September 2, one of these places POISONED me, giving me a fever and diarrhoea. Since then it again became very hard to eat.

MONEY
In the meanwhile my employer ABN AMRO, on March 6, 2015, petitioned the judge to terminate my contract. On October 20 judge Van Buitenen decided to terminate my contract and that ABN AMRO should pay me 26,560 euro for compensation. On October 23, I asked a bailiff to execute the court order of October 20; only on November 4 he issued the writ to ABN AMRO summoning payment within two days. On November 9, I asked the bailiff to confiscate the possessions of ABN AMRO, which the bailiff refused. The bailiff informed me on November 10, that he had received 12,839 euro. On November 12 the bailiff credited my bank account with 12,000 euro.
On November 29, 2015 I requested the UWV for unemployment support (werkeloosheidsuitkering). Because ABN AMRO had informed UWV I had no right for salary in the last year, I expected UWV to reject my request. On December 21 I filed a request for correction (correctieverzoek). On December 22 UWV rejected my request for unemployment support. On January 13, 2016 UWV decided to grant me unemployment support for 4348 euro gross per month (which keeps me alive).

COURT CASE – EISENBERGER
All the while the main case (bodemprocedure) against attorney Eisenberger is running, concerning the amount of money I own for his 1 letter.
On July 3 I petitioned to the court (kantonrechter) by provisional measure as incidental claim (Incidentele Conclusie) to lift the confiscation of my bank accounts totally or limit it to 7033 euro. On November 6, Judge Mr. E.R.S.M. Marres rejected my incidental claim, because otherwise the objective of the confiscation would not be achieved. On November 11, I petitioned (verzoekschrift ex art. 32 Rv) for judgement on my request to limit the confiscation, which was simply ignored. After my request was sent to Eisenberger, it was sent back to me, because it was not my turn to reply.
On November 26 Eisenberger replied (Repliek) and on 8 January, 2016 I rejoined (Dupliek). On February 5 the court decided that it would issue a verdict on February 12, 2016 but then it kept on postponing until March 11, April 8, May 6, June 3, July 1, July 29, August 26, September 23, October 21...

Comments

ABN AMRO bank is one of the largest banks in the Netherlands, it was formed in 1991 by the merger of ABN and AMRO banks (everybody in the Netherlands knows it, so I usually forget to add "bank"). From 1979 ABN was present on the American markets (it bought the LaSalle bank), some claim for money laundering.
In 2008 it went bankrupt and to prevent the share holders (including the Dutch Royal family) losing too much money, it was bought by the government. In the end of 2015 it went back to the stock markets collecting billions.
Not only was ABN AMRO connected to the Dutch Royal family and Rotschild, but from 1999 to 2003 Prince Pieter-Christiaan worked for Equity Capital Markets (a joint venture between ABN AMRO and Rothschild).
Probably you already know that banks literally "make" money.

Verdict October 21

Last October 21 the court finally ruled that I must pay attorney Ruud Eisenberger over 7000 euro (for 1 letter). To make things easier for the attorney to blackmail me, I still haven’t received the verdict myself from the court.
I was summoned on October 31 at writ by bailiff Van der Meer Philipsen to pay up.

The court simply ignored the misconduct of attorney Eisenberger.
That’s not even counting that the bill of 5400 euro for 1 letter is unreasonably high.

The court ruled that the blocking of my bank accounts was not unlawful, because the provisional judge, in which “my” attorney of Palthe Oberman argued that my accounts had to remain confiscated, decided it shouldn’t be lifted. Therefore it is irrelevant that I almost died of starvation, or that Eisenberger did not raise a single valid reason to block my accounts.
Even this judge decided against the increased demand to €20756 - because Eisenberger also wanted to be paid for the hours he could have spent on this case in the future (with the argument that I had stolen the assignment from him).

In a bizarre example of Kafkaesque jurisdiction the judge ruled that because I didn’t object “separately “ to the money Eisenberger spent on blocking my bank accounts, I also have to pay for these costs (therefore the amount went from 5400 to 7000 euro).

Because I don’t have the original verdict of the court there’s still nothing I can do.
The true nature of our legal system - organised crime.

Confiscation lifted

After careful examination of the Dutch law I found out that one month after the bailiff of attorney Eisenberger sent me the court order (October 31); the confiscation is lifted (art. 722 Rv).
On November 16 I asked the court to send me the (original) of the decision of the court that I never received; which I (finally) received on November 26. On December 5 I sent the original legal documents to a bailiff with the request to sign this and send it to Rabobank (betekenen).

On December 6 suddenly the bailiff of attorney Eisenberger sent me a mail that he would take the more than 7000 euro (for 1 letter) in accordance with the court order, which would lift the confiscation of the rest of my savings.
I should have done this earlier. Last December 16 I checked my accounts with “internet banking” and found out that since December 7 I can use my own savings (with more than 200,000 euro) again. I surely got some attention by asking at the bank office how to transfer 200,000 euro as the transaction limit is only 50,000 euro...

22 June 2012, Supreme Court ([I]Hoge Raad[/I]): [url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BW5695[/url]
This verdict consisted of unique jurisprudence. Since then the whole law on which this was based (the BBA) has been retracted...

Verdict of 12 June 2015, request denied to replace Judge Van Buitenen for conflict of interests, because she had worked with the head of Labour Affairs of ABN AMRO, Hansma, in a committee ([I]werkgroep[/I]) to replace the BBA law: [url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2015:6796[/url]

Verdict of 23 October 2015, request denied to replace Judge Marres for conflict of interests, because he worked for the same Delta Lloyd that sold insurances in a joint venture with ABN AMRO: [url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2015:8332[/url]

When I spoke to an attorney in 2015, he told me that I shouldn’t complain about all attorneys and judges knowing the corporate lawyers of the ABN AMRO, because: “[I]we all know each other[/I]”...

In short I was fired illegally in March 2004, but according to the Dutch law (at least in theory) a company can only fire somebody with a good reason…
This meant that in September 2014, ABN AMRO was ordered to pay me 10 years in salary.

Naturally I had to use every trick in the book to stop my own attorneys from stabbing me in the back. Including the biggest law firm in the Netherlands, De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek, that has represented ABN AMRO in some legal matters.
In November 2011 my (other) attorney, Christiaan Oberman, advised me to settle for something like 120,000 euro. He explained this deal with that I would have to pay taxes over that (the highest tax rates in the Netherlands are 52%), and from the remaining money would have to pay his salary and De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek.
These wonderful attorneys declared something like 35,000 euro for their copy/pasting/typing skills, which would have made my pay-out something like 25,000 euro net...

There are also 2 other verdicts by the Court of appeal ([I]Centrale Raad van Beroep[/I]) in which I was plaintiff, dated 19 May 2017.
In short I argued that the city of Amsterdam according to the Dutch legislation has the obligation to help me solve problems in getting a job. Notably the attempts to murder me and the not-anonimised publications that shows that I was locked up for half a year in a psychiatric hospital, because I’m oh so “dangerous”.
The corrupt judge simply ignored my complaints.
[url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:CRVB:2017:2160[/url]
[url]https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:CRVB:2017:2159[/url]

Firing me was part of outsourcing the department of ABN AMRO that I worked for to the Indian company TCS: [url]http://letsrollforums.com//showpost.php?p=270626&postcount=8[/url]
[quote=St Jimmy;270626]In 2002 plans were made to outsource the department of the ABN AMRO bank (in which both Rothschild and the Dutch Royal family owned a large share) for which I worked at the time, to Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) in India. The plan couldn’t fail: Indians receive less wages than the Dutch, and if ABN AMRO makes the same profit with less personnel the metrics improve (the company's profit per employee).
They could have won by doing this in a clean (legal) way, but they should have paid the 1500 Dutch employees they wanted to get rid off, more than a hundred of million euros.
In the summer of 2003 ABN AMRO replaced all the computers in the office where I worked and started the reorganisation “Inspiration” (based on CMM). Changing work processes under the guise of CMM was meant to keep everybody busy with useless activities, while we suddenly had to work in a different way (leading to burn-out mental diseases). The new computers acted strange.
In September 2003 they ordered me to work in 6 ICT-projects in 3 different functions simultaneously. Examples of harassments: stealing my wallet, middle fingers, throwing a cup of coffee over my clothes, toxic thea, yelling, intimidations, calling me names and a reprimand. In February 2004 I noticed that the office building was almost deserted. On March 1 I refused to go to work anymore and was fired. I have proof that ABN AMRO broke into my house in 2004 (also part of the reorganisation?).
On September 1, 2005 (when the reorganisation had already been finished) the outsourcing was made public: [url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4204174.stm[/url]
Labour unions, attorneys, journalists and judges were all cooperating with this ploy to get rid of employees.

The following conflicting interests, make it more interesting.
In 1989 Chatterjee with the help of Rothschildagent George Soros set up The (Soros-)Chatterjee Group (TCG). In 1994 The Chattarjee Group, Tata Group, Indian Oil Corporation and West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation founded the joint venture Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd (HPL): [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haldia_Petrochemicals[/url]
In 2004 Tata Consultancy Services was guided to the stock markets by JM Morgan Stanley, DSP Merrill Lynch and JP Morgan Chase. Member of Bilderberg Robert W. Scully was part of the direction of JM Morgan Stanley, together these 3 banks had some 30 members of the Council on Foreign Relations: [url]http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2004-06-10/news/27417686_1_public-issue-equity-shares-book-built-issue[/url]
In 2005 Chattarjee bought Basell, with the participation of Shell (also connected to both Rothschild and the Dutch Royal family) and Merrill Lynch: [url]http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2005-05-06/news/27472649_1_purnendu-chatterjee-dsp-merrill-lynch-basell-polyolefins[/url]
In December 2006 it became known that Tata Steel was counselled by NM Rothschild and ABN AMRO (!) in the acquisition of the British-Dutch Corus: [url]http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2006-12-13/news-by-company/27449549_1_csn-tata-steel-companhia-siderurgica-nacional[/url]
When in April 2013 Tata Technologies bought Cambric, not only Tata but also Cambric was advised by NM Rothschild (aren’t conflicting interests illegal?): [url]http://www.tata.com/media/releasesinside/chek0XG7M4s=/TLYVr3YPkMU=[/url]
There’s even a connection between Soros-Chatterjee, Winston Partners and Marvin Bush (younger brother of George W.): [url]http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/04-10-05/discussion.cgi.55.html[/url][/quote]