I agree to TechTarget’s Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and the transfer of my information to the United States for processing to provide me with relevant information as described in our Privacy Policy.

Please check the box if you want to proceed.

I agree to my information being processed by TechTarget and its Partners to contact me via phone, email, or other means regarding information relevant to my professional interests. I may unsubscribe at any time.

Please check the box if you want to proceed.

By submitting my Email address I confirm that I have read and accepted the Terms of Use and Declaration of Consent.

take advantage of the benefits of containers, development teams first need to properly prepare their applications, including those in the cloud, for the move.

Compared to VMs, containers are more lightweight; they take up less room on a disk and have a much lower overhead. This enables multiple containers to run more efficiently on one machine than multiple VMs could. To maximize this benefit, it's best to migrate from a monolithic application architecture to a service-based one. Identify ways to make cloud-based applications more modular and lightweight. For example, you could reduce or isolate dependencies, pay down code debt and identify and remove bottlenecks that prevent parallel execution.

This type of service-based architecture also makes it significantly easier to reuse containers and scale an application only when needed. Rather than load balancing for a deeply coupled, monolithic application to accommodate increased traffic, the web server container can scale up but doesn't needlessly scale the subsequent processes that don't experience high loads.

Create code-level manifests

Development teams generally configure containers with code-level manifests, which describe, among other items, the packages a container requires and the code that it should run. You can manage container manifests within a version control system, which enables incremental updates to better tune the application architecture as needed with minimal effort and cost.

Container management in the cloud vs. on premises

While the focus of this article is primarily on how to prepare cloud-based applications for containers, it's important to note that cloud and on-premises infrastructures present different container management options. Cloud providers offer more out-of-the-box features, such as those for container orchestration, load balancing and object storage, which are not always readily available on premises. However, when you prepare a cloud-based application for containerization, you might face integration challenges with these native features. With an on-premises environment, developers have more control and workaround options.

When you migrate cloud-based applications to container technology, prepare a manifest that matches its current hosting architecture as closely as possible. This provides a solid platform for future improvements.

However, the introduction of code-level manifests changes the dynamic in which development teams interact with operations teams. While the move makes it possible to run local development environments that are in parity with production environments, it also gives developers the ability to change the fundamental configuration of the containers the application runs on. This isn't inherently an issue, but without proper discipline, it can become problematic.

Plan for the ephemeral

Generally speaking, when you properly configure containers, they should be ephemeral.

Generally speaking, when you properly configure containers, they should be ephemeral. This lets you stop, destroy and recreate them at any point with minimal configuration. However, file storage complicates this trait. When a container is rebuilt, files stored in an ephemeral file system are automatically wiped, which can introduce a host of challenges around file uploads or containerized database servers.

To work around the challenge with containerized database servers, you could share a local directory on the host machine with a running container. However, the use of an external, cloud-based database is a more manageable option. Similarly, a cloud-based object storage service offers a more reliable and scalable way to handle file uploads than sharing a local directory.

1 comment

Register

Login

Forgot your password?

Your password has been sent to:

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy