Products

About

Tort law Essays & Research Papers

Best Tort law Essays

﻿THE LAW OF TORTS
INTRODUCTION
The word tort is of French origin and is equivalent of the English word wrong, and the Roman law term delict. It is derived from the Latin word tortum, which means twisted or crooked. It implies conduct that is twisted or crooked. It is commonly used to mean a breach of duty amounting to a civil wrong.
Definition: a tort is defined as a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for unliquidated damages and which is not exclusively the breach of a...

CASE ONE: LAW OF TORT
An accident was occurred by the car driven by Azhar with the disabled lorry which has been stalled by Ah Chan. Two of these persons have made their own fault as what happened on case Ramachandran a/l Mayandy v. Abdul Rahman bin Ambok. First of all, Azhar has derived his vehicle along a state road at slightly above the speed limit and his vehicle was equipped with a seatbelt but Azhar was not wearing it at the time of the collision. In addition, the impact of the...

tort law
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE…………………………………………….........4
Buchan v. Ortho Pharmaceutical (Canada) Ltd
Hollis v. Dow Corning Cor
Tobacco Tort Cases in Ontario
(1) THE DUTY OF CARE: GENERAL PRINCIPLES……………………………………………….....6
(a) An Introduction to the Concept of Duty……………………………………………………...6
(i) General Duty of Care Test……………………………………………………………..6
Donoghue v. Stevenson (sets out general neighbour...

Law of Tort
What is Tort?
- The French word of ‘wrong’
- That set of rules specifying certain actions and omissions as wrongs which give rise to civil liability
- Almost entirely based on case law
Tort of Negligence
- The “neighbour principle”
o “The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law, you must not injure your neighbour” Lord Atkin, Donoghue v Stevenson
 Who is neighbour? Persons who are so closely and directly affected by action that one ought reasonably to have...

NEGLIGENCE: DUTY OF CARE
Negligence is a breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage to the claimant. In order to prove negligence one must show:
1. a legal duty on the part of the a person to take care of another,
2. a breach of that duty and
3. The consequential damage attributed to the conduct and is too remote.
It was also defined as an omission to do something, which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations, which ordinarily regulate the conduct of...

The dispute that occurred among the individuals had caused potential trespass to person claims. Trespass to person tort is involved in intentional, direct interference to claimants and is branched into three elements: assault, battery and false imprisonment. Phil could claim assault against Grant due to him coming at him in an aggressive manner and for throwing a bottle at him. However Phil could also possibly be prosecuted for Battery, from Grant’s girlfriend, because of the unlawful kiss he...

4.0 INTRODUCTION
Occupiers' liability generally refers to the duty owed by land owners to those who come onto their land. However, the duty imposed on land owners can extend beyond simple land ownership and in some instances the landowners may transfer the duty to others, hence the term occupier rather than owner. The term occupier itself is misleading since physical occupation is not necessary for liability to arise. Occupiers' liability is perhaps a distinct form of negligence in that there...

Week 8
Lecture
Aspects of the Tort of
Negligence
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction
The general principles of liability for
negligence
Product liability
Liability for negligent misstatement
Vicarious liability
THE LAW OF TORT (民事侵權法)
1. What is Tort?
 One party suffers damage or loss as the
result of the action of another
 No need for a contractual relationship
 The law of tort regulates the behaviour of
individuals and legal persons
2
1. Introduction
Tort:...

1. Evaluate and discuss the potential liability (negligence or other torts) of the various parties in the scenario involving but not limited to Bobby, ACE Sports, the nurse, the surgeon and City General. (Avoid simply restating the facts/scenario. Incorporate them into your discussion.)
2. Be sure to discuss the elements of negligence as they apply to each party separately, and also discuss the application of EMTALA.
3. Define comparative negligence and discuss its application to...

PARTICIPATION ASSIGNMENT
JS 230-020
CHAPTER 7: TORT LAW
CASE PROBLEMS
1. Smiley, a buyer for Carrefour Fashions, entered the store of a rival firm, Boulevard Boutique, in order to find out what latest lines they were carrying. He was recognized by Maldini, the manager of Boulevard Boutique, who called the store detective, Rocco, and ordered him to “keep an eye” on Smiley while he, Maldini, called the police.
Maldini called the police and informed them he had a “suspected...

If the defendant has duty of care to the plaintiff and breaches his duty of care, as long as it can be proved that the defendant’s careless conduct causes damage, injury or loss to the plaintiff while the damages are foreseeable, the defendant will be liable to negligence. The following shows why ABC ltd is negligent and therefore liable to Johnny and Kenneth.
Negligence is behavior that falls below the standard of reasonable, prudent and competent people. The careless behavior alone of the...

Law of Tort
The law of tort is that set of rules specifying certain actions and omissions as wrongs which give rise to civil liability.
Tort of Negligence
It arises when damage is caused to a person or his property by a failure to take such reasonably cares as the law requires in the circumstances of the case. The damage could be caused by a negligent act or omission; meaning that the defendant did something or the defendant failed to do what he should have.
Elements of negligence
To...

Chapter 2 Negligence: basic principles
Contents
Introduction 13 2.1 2.2 2.3 Structure of the tort 13 Organisation of the chapters 14 Policy questions 14
Introduction
Negligence is the most important modern tort: its study should occupy about half the course. It is important because of the great volume of reported cases and because it is founded on a principle of wide and general application. This chapter explains the basic structure of the tort and describes the organisation of the...

INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS LAW
The Law of Tort
Core Reading:
Lucy Jones, Introduction to Business Law (Oxford University Press, 2011). Chapter 11 on The Tort of Negligence (Refer to pages 340 – 374). Please note that we ARE NOT going through every single areas in relation to negligence. For instance, the area on nervous shock.
Aims and Objectives: -
 To enable students to appreciate the general law of tort, especially the concept of negligence;
 To understand how this area...

Business Law 1 Mid Term
Teshvinder Singh Chopra
SEGi University College: American Degree Program
2 July 2010
Accordingly, as with the situation, Tim has sustained injuries from the incident. The person at fault for Tim's condition is surely Danny, as he had parked his car illegally, which definitely breaking the rules, and he as well forgotten to engage the parking brake. This caused the car to roll back and eventually hits an electric wire and the sparks from the ignition of the electric...

NEGLIGENCE
Tort Law is a field that encompasses material of considerable breadth and diversity and whose existence, as a reflected in individual actions seeking civil redress for injuries nor arising out of contractual relations can be traced can be traced back to primitive societies. (White, 2003 p.23) A ‘tort’ is a Norman word for a ‘wrong’ but ‘torts’ have typically been distinguished from crimes and from ‘wrongs’ identified with contractual relations. Tort Law is concerned with...

Based on William’s case, we need to examine the law of tort and its’ terms. Tort is a civil wrong and it can be a negligent, nuisance or defamation not arising out of a contract. A tort can also be defined as “an act that injures someone in some way, and for which the injured person may sue the wrongdoer for damages” (http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t032.htm).
There are several torts that are practiced, such as the tort of passing off, the tort of vicarious liability, tort of conspiracy, tort of...

Case 1: Tort Law- Farmer Brown vs. Chauncey and Gardiner Transport Ltd.
Tort law is a very broad area of law; the legal term is used to describe activities that either intentionally or unintentionally cause injury to others or their properties, where the person causing the injury has no legal right to cause the injury. Thus being said there are many facts to look at in the case of farmer Brown vs. Chauncey and Gardiner Transport Ltd.
In this case the actions of Chauncey preformed were...

﻿
A brief introduction of People’s Republic of China’s Tort Law
Student Name: QIAN,Xin
Group: MLM09-01
Student Number:0892439
Table of Contents
Background
The Tort Liability Law of the People’s Republic of China (‘Tort Law’) which was passed on December 29, 2009, came into effect since July 1, 2010. It is believed that more and more public affairs could damage civil benefits as a result of the rapid development in china’s economy and society. As the...

The aim of tort law is to compensate the claimant and to deter defendants' discuss whether the rules of causation and remoteness of damage fulfil this aim.
The rules of causation state that the claimant has to prove that the defendants breach of duty was the factual cause of material damage, when considering the facts of Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital Management Committee (CKHMC) where the claimants husband became ill after drinking tea which had arsenic, when taken to hospital, the...

Q1: What is a tort?
Tort: A civil wrong not arising from a breach of contract; a breach of a legal duty
that proximately causes harm or injury to another.
Q2: What are the four elements of negligence?
They are Duty, Breach, Injury, and Causation.
Q3: Is Shannon liable for the tort of negligence?
Yes, she is. First of all, she has been told by her physician that not to drive after
taking the medication. Thus she has the duty not to drive in order to take...

Building law and contract admin
Assignment no 2 Tort
Volenti non fit injuria
Latin / voluntary assumption of risk. A defence in tort that means where a person engages in an event accepting and aware of the risks inherent in that event, then they can not later complain of, or seek compensation for an injury suffered during the event. This is used most often to defend against tort actions as a result of a sports injury
Smith v Charles...

Tort of Negligence case study
The law of contract:
a contract is a legally binding agreement, its a promise between two or more to parties with certain things,each party must fulfill there promises if one of them don't fulfill there promise then the contract is breached (VOID).
The law of tort:
A tort is a civil wrong in the sens that is committed against an individual, tort is compensated by a sum of money called “DAMAGES”.
Contract laws and tort laws share many similarities....

By Aaron Larson
Law Offices of Aaron Larson
October, 2003
Contents
Proximate Cause
The Elements of a Negligence Action
Gross Negligence
Children and Negligence
Comparative Negligence
Contributory Negligence
Mixed Comparative and Contributory Negligence
Vicarious Liability
In general terms, negligence is "the failure to use ordinary care" through either an act or omission. That is, negligence occurs when:
somebody does not exercise the amount of care that a reasonably...

TRESPASS TO LAND
BUKIT LENANG DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v. TELEKOM MALAYSIA BHD & ORS [2012] 1 CLJ
FACTS
The plaintiff purchased a land from Oakfield Enterprises Sdn Bhd through a sale and
purchase agreement dated 15 May 1996. The plaintiff was aware at that time of the presence of squatters on the land. Following the said purchase, the plaintiff commenced eviction proceedings against the squatters and succeeded in obtaining judgment where the court ordered that the squatters surrender vacant...

Torts of negligence are breaches of duty that results to injury to another person to whom the duty breached is owed. Like all other torts, the requirements for this are duty, breach of duty by the defendant, causation and injury(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). However, this form of tort differs from intentional tort as regards the manner the duty is breached. In torts of negligence, duties are breached by negligence and not by intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the standard of care...

Task1
What kind of liability do you think Ton should bear in Scenario 1? Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability
Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability.
There are three differences between liability and contractual liability:
A. The difference of base. Contractual liability means that due to the breach of duty, contractual collateral obligation of contract or violates the "contract law" provisions of the obligations. Finding out a contractual liability has to...

﻿
BML 107 Introductory Law for Managers
Individual Report – Law of Tort and Employment
1205636
Harry, aged 10, is a pupil at St Botolph’s. One day last year he fell over when running to school and gashed his leg very badly. He managed to hobble into the school to seek help. The school nurse was unwell that day, but Mrs Tourniquet, the biology teacher who has been employed by the school for 2 years, attended to him....

﻿
Unit 3 Assignment: Legal Analysis and FIRAC
Kaplan University
PA201-Introduction to Legal Research
Ind. Code Ann. § 34-20-3-1 (West 2011)
Facts: Samantha Smith, a young and single mother, was shopping in the bath aisle of the local grocery store in Indiana. At approximately 1:30 pm she slipped and fell on a clear shampoo that had leaked out of one of the bottles and onto the floor. The aisle had been inspected, logged as clear of any dangerous hazards at 1:00 pm by an older...

﻿ABSTRACT
This essay deals with the law of torts, and more specifically the tort of negligence. It discusses cases and judgements related to it. It concludes by looking at the elements of negligence and their meanings.
THE LAW OF TORTS
A tort is basically a civil wrong. A civil wrong is an act, intentional or otherwise, the consequences of which include, but are not limited to damage to life or property, injury to a person, emotional or mental...

Who is the reasonable man? Factors considered whether he adopted necessary care?
Tort of negligence = failure by Def to conform with standard of behaviour.
Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable person guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs would do or doing something which a prudent & reasonable person would not do.
While a loss from an accident usually lies where it falls a defendant cannot plead accident if,...

Introduction
This assignment will establish the elements needed for a person to be held liable in Tortious Law. Once the elements have been established they shall then be used to determine if the individuals in each scenario would be held liable.
Tort Law
Tort Law in layman’s terms is a civil wrong. It does not necessarily need to be an illegal action but an action that has consequently caused harm or suffering to another. The main outcome for a person claiming they have been a victim of a...

Introduction
There are many situations or acts that are not directly marked as crimes and not arise out of contracts or statutes. Those acts are considered as civil wrongs and cause damages and injuries to individuals or businesses. These damages, injuries or wrongful acts are called tort. Tort is the area of law where in response to a private or civil wrong or injury the courts provide the remedy of allowing a lawsuit for those wrongs, injuries or damages. Thus, the goal of tort is to...

Tort
Civil or non-criminal wrongful conducts or omissions arising out from non-contractual obligations and causing injuries to another party by providing remedies for the injuries.
“Tort”norman-french language –means mischief and wrong
Comes from latin- tortus – means crooked, wrung and twisted.
Sir John Salmon – Tort: a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common law action for unliqudated damages, and which is not exclusively the breach of contract or trust or other equitable...

Torts
Defenses to Negligence, Pg. 106, 4.7
In the case of Peterson v. Donahue, Neal Peterson sued David Donahue for negligence after a ski collision that occurred while both parties were on the ski slopes. Eleven year old Peterson was coming down the slopes very fast when he collided with forty three year old, advanced skier, Donahue who was skating across the slope toward the parking lot. Donahue saw Peterson seconds before the impact which knocked him out of his skis ten to twelve feet...

﻿
It should be seen that the courts do not always mark out the bounds of duty to limit the responsibility of the defendant, they sometimes do it to protect the interests of someone who has suffered a loss. However it is important for the courts to limit the responsibility of the defendant due to the ‘floodgates problem’. What is more, the courts sometimes treat certain groups of defendants leniently by limiting their liability in some cases.
On one hand, the courts draw a line to mark...

﻿
TORT LAW REVISION GUIDE: LLB/LLM PROGRAMME 2014
General Guidance
All topics covered on the Tort module are potential examination topics. This revision guide covers only those potential examination topics deemed core areas of knowledge in tort law. All students, whether studying toward the LLB or LLM, must have full command of these core topics for any assessment in tort law.
Unless these notes expressly state otherwise, students can expect core examination topics to appear in...

﻿Grade: A
University of London
LLB, 2nd year
Tort Law
Question
Amber Valley Primary School was closed 6 months ago by Amber Borough Council (ABC), the local education authority, which owns all the land and buildings. The school has been standing empty while ABC attempts to find a buyer for the site. Although ABC placed fencing around the site, local residents reported that youths had broken into the site on a number of occasions.
Last week a group of youths from a nearby young...

Intentional Interference With Person or Property A. Intent 2 types 1. Specific Intent consciously desiring the physical result 2. General Intent knowledge that the result is substantially certainty to follow -The Restatement places torts somewhat on a continuum with Negligence The most culpable form of intent would be a specific intent, or morally apprehensible form of misconduct you swing a baseball bat to hit someone in the face General intent would be next on the continuum knowing with...

Garden Club Guests and Liability
Nicola Grover
Professor, Theresa Dike
November 27, 2011
LEG 300
The difference between an invitee and a licensee is the level of duty of care owed to each by the landowner. A person who enters the premises of a landowner by invitation, as part of the general public for a lawful purpose, would be considered an invitee. The landowner must provide an invitee reasonable care to keep the invitee safe from harm. This means the landowner must be aware of...

﻿‘TORTS – Essay One’
Student ID - 250755
November 14, 2014
FARMER v. PILOT
TRESPASS
Trespass is defined by the act of knowingly entering another person’s property without permission. Such action is held to infringe upon a property owner’s legal right to enjoy the benefits of ownership. Trespass comes in two forms: trespass to land, and trespass to chattel. In either case, trespass means using the property without permission of the owner.
Trespass to chattel is an intentional...

Introduction
This essay is an attempt to advise Changwa on the area of law under which he can bring an action in view of the facts given in the question. The essay will also attempt to advise Changwa with respect to the person against whom such action can be brought. In order to achieve this end, the essay will pay particular attention to the salient elements he has to establish in the area of law identified, if at all he is to succed in his claim. The essay will conclude by looking at the...

Assignment II- The Element of Alternative Liability
Prof Lindsey Appiah
Tort Law
November 4, 2012
Defenses of Negligence
In a tort case, the burden of proof falls on the feet of the plaintiff. However, there are situations where if the plaintiff is able to show duty, breach, causation and damages, the negligence of the plaintiff may ultimately bar or limit their recovery. There are several defenses a defendant can raise which include contributory negligence, comparative negligence and...

LGST101: Business Law
AY 2011-2012, Term 1
Group 8 Project Written Analysis
Tort of Negligence
Prepared for: Professor Melvyn Chew
Written By:
Jamie Lim Jia Qi (#12)
Joel Koh Yong Kiat (#14)
Low Hwan Hong (#23)
Oh Zhan Yuan (#24)
Ong Hui Ming Maria Nicolette (#25)
G12
Throughout the course of this report, to determine if the plaintiff is owed a duty of care in negligence, we will adhere by the Singapore single test of negligence laid out in the case of Spandeck Engineering...

In the United States justice system, a tort is best defined as an injury or loss that was committed deliberately or negligently by a single person or an entity (Crane). The history of tort law can be traced back to the initial trespass of property or person, but it was not until the 18th century that the distinction between intentional and unintentional acts was made (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia). In recent years, tort law has become the center of scrutiny through the increase in tort...

﻿TORTS I OUTLINE
Professor K. Chadwick
Development of Liability Based on Fault
a. A tort is a civil wrong, other than a breach of contract, for which the law provides a legal remedy.
b. Area of law that imposes duties on persons to act in a manner that will not injure other persons
c. A person who breaches a tort duty may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured by that tort
d. Initially, you had to have a writ from the King in order to have a claim in court. There were two...

THE ROLE OF TORT LAW
Compensatory Function:
-Compensation for people who are injured by a wrong, injury to the person , or to the property
Torts law can be divided into trespass action on the case and statutory torts
TORT LAW REFORM
Torts law used to be judge made, similar to common law 20th century statues came in Workers Compensation scheme, Motor Accidents Scheme, Occupational Health and Safety (Factories Act), Dust Diseases Schemes. Drug Compensation Schemes (uk).
Characteristics...

Negligent Tort
Negligence is neglect or disregard. Tort is a legal misgiving. Negligent tort is a type of tort in the legal system. The concept encompasses that of which an occasion where an individual’s “acts leading to injury are neither expected nor intended.” (Yell, 1999) In this paper, the elements of a negligent tort, the concepts of proximate causation and duty of care, and types of remedies for finding tort liability will be explored.
Elements of Negligent Tort
There are...

TORT TUTORIAL 7
* Differences between libel and slander. Is the distinction of practical significance?
Defamation protects an individuals reputation.
Slander refers to a malicious, false, and defamatory spoken statement or report (non- permanent), while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images.(permanent)
The fundamental distinction between libel and slander lies solely in the form in which the defamatory matter is published. If the offending...

Negligent Tort
Catherine Kelly
BUS670: Legal Environment
Instructor Troy Tureau
October 24, 2011
Negligent Tort
Introduction
Along with the developing industries in the 19th century, came more injuries; since these injuries did not fall under the category of intentional tort, the courts enforced the law of negligence (Weil, N., & McMillan, R., 2003). This paper will provide a brief overview of negligent tort and the various remedies for a finding of tort liability.
Negligent Tort...

Intentional Tort of Defense
Erica Davis
Introduction to Tort
June 7, 2012
Facts
On a Saturday night there were an incident between two males and a female in a bar called Bottom’s Up. A man name John had too much to drink and was intoxicated. He was shouting obscenities toward a lady name Jane that was sitting at a table next to another guy name Leroy, which he was a frequent customer. However, Jane ignored John and continued to drink her beer. When she ignored him than he approached her...

Tort Law and Cases:
A Comparison of Two Cases and Their Potential Frivolity8/22/2010
|
Introduction
“A tort is a civil wrong resulting in injury to a person or property”; that is brought before a court to compensate the injured party (Bagley & Savage, 2010, pg 251). In order to prove an intentional tort, the following conditions must be met:
1) Intent
2) Voluntary act by the defendant
3) Causation
4) Injury or Harm.
The following tort cases, Pearson v. Chung and...

THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE - DUTY OF CARE
EXISTENCE OF A DUTY
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562,
• Lord Atkin attempted to lay down a general principle which would cover all the circumstances where the courts had already held that there could be liability for negligence. He said:
"The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law, you must not injure your neighbour; and the lawyer's question, Who is my neighbour? … You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions...

Tort Law
A tort is a civil wrong arising from an act or failure to act, independently of any contact, for which an action for personal injury or property damages may be brought. It deals with situations where a person’s behaviour has unfairly caused someone else to suffer loss or harm. A person who suffers a tortious act is entitled to receive compensation for “damages”, usually money payment from the person or people responsible.
The tort of negligence is a type of civil wrong where a...

Vicarious Liability
* Employer’s liability for employee’s wrongdoing committed by employee in course employment- strict liability/ absence of wrongdoing by defendant
* Employer will not be liable unless employer-employee relationship/ employee must commit a tort/ must be during course employment
* Casual potency important
* Must be committed by an employee- employer/employee relationship:
* Distinguished between contract of employment/contract for employment
*...

﻿Issues Identified:
1. Whether William has an action in common negligence against Edmund.
2. Whether Sam has action in rescuer’s duty against Edmund
3. Whether William has an action in vicarious liability against TCS
4. Whether Sam has an action in vicarious liability against TCS
Pleadings:
1. William v Edmund
A. Duty of care
Foreseeability – there will be accidents if bus isn’t checked properly and if Edmund doesn’t watch the road. Fair just reasonable. Proximity – safety of William...

Negligent and Intentional Tort
Barry University
EDU 674 The Legal Environment in Education
Timothy D. Blevins, J. D.
While conducting a tort walk at one of the local middle schools we identified several possible torts. One was of a building code violation, another in the way money was handled in the lunch room. I am going to pursue the building code violation and what the possible injury could be if not corrected.
Upon our tort walk we discovered several windows open to the...

Question 1
What legal issues does this situation raise and what are the possible legal consequences?
Issue 1--duty of care
The tort of negligence to be constituted depend on whether the defendant violate the principle of ‘Duty 0f Care’. Because of the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1], ‘Duty 0f Care’ has been established in common law: 1. Defendant whether or not fulfill the duty of care. 2. That defendant whether or not breached that duty. 3. whether Breach the duty of care is the main...

DEFENCES
There are two options open to stop a defendants liability:
1) by denying the claimant a cause of action (i.e. the defendant was not negligent; no duty, too remote)
2) providing the defendant with an appropriate defence
Volenti non fit injuria (consent)
Willing acceptance of the risk associated with the negligence; knowledge is not enough
Complete escape of liability
Lord Denning in Nettleship v. Weston = nothing will suffice short of an agreed waiver of any claim for...

TORTS – INTENTIONAL TORTS
PRIMA FACIE
Battery is the (1) intentional infliction of (2) a harmful or offensive (3) contact. Offensive includes acts damaging to a “reasonable sense of dignity.” No knowledge of contact is required. (Rationale: protection of personal integrity. Freedom from intentional and unpermitted contact. Offensive harm included b/c of mental injuries).
▪ To have a claim of battery, there must be a claim of fault, negligence, or wrongdoing on the part...

Torts Outline
Exam Analysis Chart out all of the torts that are in the fact pattern. Who are the plaintiffs and defendants? Make the prima facie case. Raise the defenses to the prima facie case. General considerations, if any. Vicarious liability Joint tortfeasors Intentional Torts – Attacking the fact pattern Always treat the plaintiff as an average person (no super sensitivities except when D is aware of them.) Everyone is liable for an intentional tort!
1
Torts Outline
1)...

ARTICLE 2179. When the plaintiff's own negligence was the immediate and proximate cause of his injury, he cannot recover damages. But if his negligence was only contributory, the immediate and proximate cause of the injury being the defendant's lack of due care, the plaintiff may recover damages, but the courts shall mitigate the damages to be awarded. (n)
REQUISITES FOR A QUASI-DELICT
1. There must be an act or omission;
2. There must be fault or negligence attendant in the same...

BUS 2100 – Business Law
TORT REFORM
Tort reform is a group of ideas and laws designed to change the way our civil justice system works. It’s designed to make it more difficult for injured people to file a lawsuit, make it more difficult for injured people to obtain a jury trial, and to place limits on the amount of money injured people receive in a lawsuit. In my opinion it's just all a load of crap that takes a dump on our already sketchy legal system. It takes the rights of the people out of...

The Intentional Tort
An intentional tort requires intent to commit an act, the consequences of which interfere with the personal or business interests of another in a way not permitted by law. It does not have to be an evil or harmful motive behind the tort. As a matter of fact tort law says intent means that the person intended the consequences of his or her act and knew with certainty that certain consequences would result from the act. The tort I will be discussing is assault and battery....

University of Phoenix Material
BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet
Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions.
Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement
Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain.
WIRETIME, Inc. places an ad in a magazine stating that BUGusa devices were low quality and did not work for more than a month. The tort is defamation. Defamation occurs when one party makes a false statement about another....

Textbook notes that: “The tort of negligence occurs when someone suffers injury because of another’s failure to live up to a required duty of care” (Miller, R., & Jentz, G, p.90). This is a basic definition of the tort of negligence. To determine whether there was negligence tort committed there must be failure to provide duty of care.
In order to have a successful negligence case, the plaintiff must prove the following four elements.
1. That the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff....

Table of Contents
Task 1 2
Claim 1 3
Claim 2 5
Task 2 9
Claim 3 11
References 13
Task 1
Describe the nature of general tortuous liability comparing and contrasting to contractual liability
* There are some similarities between tortious and contractual liability
Both tortious liability and contractual liability are civil law obligations, so the remedies of all two them are only damages, injunction or specific performance without punishment as well as the civil courts have...

﻿Concurrent liability  Text [13.45] – [13.65], [13.80] – [13.120]
Vicarious liability is the liability of an employer for a tort committed by an employee within the course of employment
Stevens v Brodribb sawmilling  the existence of control between an employer and employee is not enough to prove a relationship for vicarious liability. Further criteria such as obligation to work, hours to work etc is also considered
Elazac pty ltd v Sheriff  the plaintiff was not an employee but a...

Please find on Lexis and read the following case:
Watson v. Dixon, 130 N.C. App. 47 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998).
Then, please answer, in one to two paragraphs each, each of the following questions:
1) 1) What were the essential facts of that case?
2) 2) What are the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress under North Carolina law?
3) 3) How were the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress applied to that case? In other words, explain why the court...

Intentional Torts
A. A person acts with intent to produce a consequence if:
1. the person has the purpose of producing that consequence; OR
2. the person knows to a substantial certainty that the consequence will ensue from the person s conduct
B. Battery
1. An actor commits battery if he acts intending:
a. to cause a harmful or offensive contact to person of other or a third person OR
b. to cause imminent apprehension of such contact AND...

Individual Assignment
MBA 502C Business Law
Tort Reform
Like many legal issues, the mentioning of tort reform has the ability to stir up controversial debates. Tort reform addresses civil lawsuits of various degrees such as medical malpractice, automobile accidents, and personal injury. Therefore supporters of tort reform seek to ensure laws are changed that limits the amount of damage recovered. Those who are against tort reform believe their Constitutional rights are violated.
Dan...

Outline the law of tort on trespass/assault/battery and discuss one in relation to patient autonomy.
Introduction:
It is said that nurses hold a certain power over patients, which makes the nurse-patient relationship unequal and takes independence away from the patient. In order to allow the patient more independence and freedom of choice, the law has come up with the concept of patient autonomy. This provides the patient with a chance to voice their own opinion and the power to consent to...

Recognizing and Minimizing Tort and Regulatory Risk Plan
Karla Ann Lewis
Individual Assignment
Professor James Eisneman
University of Phoenix
December 14, 2010
Recognizing and Minimizing Tort and Regulatory Risk Plan
This regulatory risk plan will recognize the most common torts and risks that are associated business regulation simulation that the learning teams of this course studied. This risk plan will also include how regulatory risks will be identified and analyzed through...

In the United States, individuals and families are constantly bombarded with advertisements for goods and services. The competition to sell these goods and services is fierce. From fast food to electronics and cars, the list goes on and on. Companies are always fighting for whatever disposable income a person may have left. The ads always make the person feel that they are going to need that new cell phone or car. It’s going to make that person feel better or make their lives much easier once...

﻿GROUP ASSIGNMENT 8: Tort of Negligence
Issue 1: Chew’s Losses - $300,000, Anxiety, Medical bills and the Closure of his stall.
Suing Chew under misrepresentation
A special relationship between Chew and Don [Hedley Byrne v Heller]
Representor has reasonable grounds to believe his statement was true.
Is a term; as Chew would not invest in the bonds if not for Don’s words.
Sue for negligent misrepresentation (Using “But-for” test to assess damages)
Suing under the Tort of Negligence,...

Intentional Tort Paper
Unit 3
Holly Cord
Kaplan University
PA165-01
Intentional Torts
Black’s Law Dictionary defines assault as “the threat or use of force on another that causes that person to have a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact.” This means that the tortfeasor does not have to make physical contact with the victim. The victim only needs to be placed under a reasonable amount of fear that the physical contact will occur. In fact if physical contact...

Definitions Assignment - TORT
Intentional Torts – Intentional Torts are battery, assault, false imprisonment, trespass to land, trespass to chattel, and conversion. See examples of each below.
Battery – The intentional unlawful, harmful, or offensive touching of the person of another.
Example: The verbal argument has escalated to the point that Susan raised her hand and slapped Joe on the cheek. Susan committed battery against Joe.
Assault – The intentional threatening of another with...

September 16, 2006
Worksheet 1
EMPLOYMENT TORTS
Employer’s Liability
1. Introduction
The basis of the liability of an employer for negligence in respect of injury suffered by his employee during the course of the employee’s work is twofold:
1. He may be liable for breach of the personal duty of care which he owes to each employee;
2. He may be vicariously liable for breach by one employee of the duty of care which that employee owes to his fellow employees.
The action...

SERGIO F. NAGUIAT, doing business under the name and style SERGIO F. NAGUIAT ENT., INC., & CLARK FIELD TAXI, INC., petitioners,
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (THIRD DIVISION), NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF WORKINGMEN and its members, LEONARDO T. GALANG, et al., respondents.
FACTS: Naguiat is the president and a stockholder of Clark Field Taxi, Inc. (CFT). Due to the phase-out of the US bases in the country, Clark Air Base was closed and the taxi drivers of CFTI were separated from service....

Elvis and Dionne have a claim against Mercury Partners who prepared an audit of Holly plc. that overvalued their assets. This overvaluation lead to the pair purchasing (additional) shares in Holly plc, and consequently suffering monetary losses.
The law of negligence can only be applied to the audit prepared by Mercury if we establish a duty of care owed by mercury, a breach of said duty and a consequent loss to Elvis or Dionne as a result. These three conditions, once satisfied can be used...

Explain how the High Court decision in Perre & Ors v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) differed in principle from the High Court decision in Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Dredge “Willemstad” (1976).
Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Dredge “Wilemstad” (1976) and Perre & Ors v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) has been important cases in the history of Tort Law.
Negligence is a complex term including advertent and inadvertent acts and omissions where there has been a failure to take reasonable care...

Tort law appears to discriminate between different types of defendant’s such as public entities, rescuers, children, manufacturers, etc. when establishing a duty of care and to whom. This is because the law of torts is a specialized area of the law that seeks to account for damages in a civil setting that may occur because of a breach of that duty. Further, much of tort law has been developed randomly, many times to fill in gaps that exist in the law, and at other times, it is influenced by...

﻿BUSINESS LAW - BBAL201
Term 3 2013
Business Law Assignment
Name：Yue Xingchen
Student No：S57975
Date：11/09/13
Executive Summary
This report is going to analyse the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) and torts in Australia. The Wrong Act 1958(Vic) is one of the most important proposed law in Victoria, It has been amendment in 2002 and 2003. The aim of the wrong Act was to legislate for wrongs against a person, Torts...

LAW OF TORT LAW2002-N 20011/12
Lectures 3 and 4: Trespass to the Person
Lectures 5 – 12: Negligence
TRESPASS TO THE PERSON
Reading:
Steele Chap 2 to page 81; Street Chap 3; Winfield Chap 4.
ASSAULT AND BATTERY
Introduction
Battery: intentional application of force to another person.
Assault: act of the defendant which causes to the claimant reasonable apprehension of the infliction of an immediate battery on him by the defendant.
Battery
1. The...

Tort reform refers to the proposed changes in the common law civil justice systems that would reduce tort litigation and/or damages. Tort liability imposes significant cost on society. In 1991, US has spent a total of $131.6 billion on tort litigation, which is approximately 2.3% of the gross domestic product (GDP)1 Studies have shown that the citizens pay a tort tax of $1200 per individual or nearly $5000 for a family of four. 2 Today, tort reform is a contentious political issue and its...

﻿
Blake v. Barnard 1840
A man put his gun at the head of another and said, 'Be quiet or I blow your brain out'.
No assault.
If the person did what he is told nothing would happen.
Contrast: READ v. CROKER (1853).
Byrne (Canada) 1968 Canada Supreme Court
A man went into a bank.
Having a jacket over his hand, he said: I have a gun, give me the money or I shoot.
No assault.
He did not show the gun.
Persuasive precedent.
Janvier v. Sweeny 1919 Court of Appeal
Private detectives...

1.Lochgelly v mc mullan
A miner was killed when part of the coal mine that he was working in fell on top of him. The man’s family successfully sued for damages under the Coal Mines Act 1911 (c 50) s 49 (repealed), which required that an employer must ensure that the roof of every coal mine is made secure and not order an employee to work there if it is not. The coal mine owners appealed the decision, but their appeal was dismissed as it was held that the initial action was competent as their...

Tort
Q-Define Tort, and its essentials.
Q- injuria sine dmno and damnum sine injuria.
Q- write a short note s on the following in the light of two latin maxims•
•
Gloucester Grammar School Case.
Ashby V white
The word tort has been derived from the Latin term tortum, which means to twist. It includes that
conduct which is not straight or lawful.
It is equivalent to the English term wrong. Tort is the breach of duty recognized by law.
Definition of Tort-Salmond- it is a civil wrong...

NEGLIGENCE
DEFINITION
A failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. The behavior usually consists of actions, but can also consist of omissions when there is some duty to act (e.g., a duty to help victims of one's previous conduct).
OVERVIEW
Primary factors to consider in ascertaining whether the person's conduct lacks reasonable care are the foreseeable likelihood that the person's conduct will result in...

Tort case scenarios
Tort Case Scenarios
Tort Case Scenarios
The scenarios below provide several examples of torts to include negligence, unintentional torts, intentional torts, assault, battery, etc. Torts are civil wrongs recognized by law as grounds for a lawsuit. These wrongs result in an injury or harm constituting the basis for a claim by the injured party (Cornell, 2010).
Scenario 1
Scenario 1 has multiple instances that happen during the game that raises attention...