Investigation X

New series “Discovery Investigates” has officially changed its name to “Investigation X”. Our episode featuring the Kokomo sighting will
premiere Monday, October 13th at 9 or 10pm on The Discovery Channel. Check your local listings for exact times.

The problem with UFO Hunters, UFO Files, Ghost Hunters, etc, is that they play games, go into commercials with teasers that make you think you are
going to get something concrete, then you get the same old fluff. Why don't they do a real investigation, confront government officials, and try to
get some real answers? I'm sick and tired of all this "reality" crap on TV that leads to nowhere.

The show is on tonight at 9pm eastern time on the Discovery Channel. Check your TV guide for your time zone. I am really looking forward to the show
tonight to see the illustration of what Officer X saw in Stephenville!

I thought it was a good show. I liked how they presented evidence and witness testimony without much debunking at all. The animation of what Officer
X says he saw was jaw-dropping. I don't think it was a man made craft. Kudos to the Discovery Channel!

Originally posted by kettlebellysmith
The problem with UFO Hunters, UFO Files, Ghost Hunters, etc, is that they play games, go into commercials with teasers that make you think you are
going to get something concrete, then you get the same old fluff. Why don't they do a real investigation, confront government officials, and try to
get some real answers? I'm sick and tired of all this "reality" crap on TV that leads to nowhere.

I thought they did an excellent job. As for the Kokomo part there were a lot of things they did not mention. But I did not know of the radar returns
that showed several F16s and another object. Also the experiment on sonic boom from a disc shaped object was interesting. It was louder than that of
F16. Although the boom was heard across a wide area oddly there were pockets that did not hear the boom.

I thought that they did an excellent job comparing the three incidents. I really had no idea of so many similarities. And just when I thought that the
image expert guy was going to try his hardest to debunk things, he really didn't. I live in Indiana and, for one, am really glad that the Kokomo
incident is finally getting the attention that it deserves. It's just too bad that some attention has been needlessly diverted this past week.

They needed different types of investigators, though. Fine to have an "aviation photographer" take a look at the pictures and video but I'll bet
dollars to doughnuts that if an astronomer took a look at that Claudia gal's long-exposure picture they would tell you what planet that bright streak
is.

the show was awesome! i had no idea it was coming on and i was just about to go to bed but i just happened to find it. the animations were
professional, and the eye witnesses segments were to the point. no suspense building at all. i had no idea KOMONO was an event! i liked the sonic boom
model tests.

Things I did not like..the one video on colored lights and people screaming was from Denver not Kokomo IN. It also was from Jan. The obvious flare
video I think was from the following day after the incident. They neglected to mention the apparent crash site and numerous witnesses who claim
unmarked SUVs trucks showed up and got something. They also did not include the transcript of 911 which clarrifies there were dozens of first
responders out looking and how they directed one of the vehicles to switch to secure channel. But it was a start. There is at least one existing
video I know of from that day which shows something burning.

Agreed BP. But I also think that they were primarily focusing on the similarites between the three. Heck, I've never heard of the Southwick incident.
Maybe the UFO Hunters will go into more of those details. I am really nervous about how well they will cover it. I think that they need to be less
dramatic and more focused. We shall see, huh?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.