I am doing geneology in America. The people that founded all of America except for the extreeme North East states where all Scotts-Irish. Or, if you prefer Ulster-Irish. These were Scotts that were forced to move to Ireland to make a Protestant majority.

I know all the old stories. In America, we do not care less about Protestant or Catholic. I know in Ireland all the problems were caused by England. My American/Irish/Scottich also hated the English.

The Southern flag was the cross of St. Andrew.

Forgive my ignorance. And I will not be upset by what anyone says. I am just trying to trace my history. What am I. My Ancestors came to America in the early 1600's. Before that they were forced to lived in Ulster for a while (maybe hundreds of years - I have no Idea). Before that Scotland.

No smart remarks that I am just an American. That is obvious. The question is do the Scotts-Irish have any realy Irish in them? It gets confusing when we know that the original Irish came from Scotland.

Boards like this can be a good exchange of information, but I say that there
is more and more good scholarly work that is dealing with the peopling
of Europe and particularly Ireland and Britain. I recommend a book
on the peopling of America (if you haven't already seen it) called "Albion's Seed" which attempts to describe how people from various parts of the British Isle's broughtly different cultures to different parts of North America. This book is considered a modern classic in that it is both scholarly and accesible.

I think you find that the original base population layer was the same for
most of the british Isles (and the western fringe of Europe). The
rest of that history would then entail various waves of settlement
from the Mediteranean and further North in the continent.

We must also be careful when use terms like "Keltic/Celtic" since a culture
and language can be embraced by a people without genetic exchange.
So don't go looking for Celtic genetic markers. Most ancient Celtic
archaeology digs have been around the Alpine region of Europe (Austria,
Czech Republic).

Boards like this can be a good exchange of information, but I say that there
is more and more good scholarly work that is dealing with the peopling
of Europe and particularly Ireland and Britain. I recommend a book
on the peopling of America (if you haven't already seen it) called "Albion's Seed" which attempts to describe how people from various parts of the British Isle's broughtly different cultures to different parts of North America. This book is considered a modern classic in that it is both scholarly and accesible.

I think you find that the original base population layer was the same for
most of the british Isles (and the western fringe of Europe). The
rest of that history would then entail various waves of settlement
from the Mediteranean and further North in the continent.

We must also be careful when use terms like "Keltic/Celtic" since a culture
and language can be embraced by a people without genetic exchange.
So don't go looking for Celtic genetic markers. Most ancient Celtic
archaeology digs have been around the Alpine region of Europe (Austria,
Czech Republic).

If the ancient Celts are from the Alps, is that where white people are from? I saw a show a while back that did some analysis on a tooth found around Stonehenge, and they concluded the guy was from Switzerland. It is amazing that people back then moved around so much. I would have never guessed.

I am doing geneology in America. The people that founded all of America except for the extreeme North East states where all Scotts-Irish. Or, if you prefer Ulster-Irish. These were Scotts that were forced to move to Ireland to make a Protestant majority.

I know all the old stories. In America, we do not care less about Protestant or Catholic. I know in Ireland all the problems were caused by England. My American/Irish/Scottich also hated the English.

The Southern flag was the cross of St. Andrew.

Forgive my ignorance. And I will not be upset by what anyone says. I am just trying to trace my history. What am I. My Ancestors came to America in the early 1600's. Before that they were forced to lived in Ulster for a while (maybe hundreds of years - I have no Idea). Before that Scotland.

No smart remarks that I am just an American. That is obvious. The question is do the Scotts-Irish have any realy Irish in them? It gets confusing when we know that the original Irish came from Scotland.

100

No offence buddy but this anti English stuff is absolute garbage and completely ignorant. You offend fellow English White Supremicists with this lazy ill thought out ramblings.

If the ancient Celts are from the Alps, is that where white people are from? I saw a show a while back that did some analysis on a tooth found around Stonehenge, and they concluded the guy was from Switzerland. It is amazing that people back then moved around so much. I would have never guessed.
2508

ha ha ha ha ratflmao!! ha ha
the alps now is it? well thats a new one on me, and all because of a tooth they found in stonehenge eh? who needs years of scientific and demograhic and genetic research when we can re interpret history with the discovery of a tooth, whos owner could have got there for a hundred different reasons.

As for the original poster of this thread, yes of course scots irish have irish blood, after all the pre 'celt' irish colonised parts of scotland in the previous millenia. THe roman word 'scotia /scotium' meant 'irishman' or those from ireland who lived in scotland back then. That was long before the english ever got there and forced the scots (who were by then a mix of irish and pithcs) over to ulster.

And will scarlet, this is not 'anti-english' stuff, its histroy and the anglo saxon-english have to face up to what their ancestors have done and how they have weakend the white race with all their wars and invasions. The worst part being or course, bringing black and mud skinned slaves to europe and america and polluting forever those once pure countries. Though to be fair they werent the only ones who did that.

ha ha ha ha ratflmao!! ha ha
the alps now is it? well thats a new one on me, and all because of a tooth they found in stonehenge eh? who needs years of scientific and demograhic and genetic research when we can re interpret history with the discovery of a tooth, whos owner could have got there for a hundred different reasons.

As for the original poster of this thread, yes of course scots irish have irish blood, after all the pre 'celt' irish colonised parts of scotland in the previous millenia. THe roman word 'scotia /scotium' meant 'irishman' or those from ireland who lived in scotland back then. That was long before the english ever got there and forced the scots (who were by then a mix of irish and pithcs) over to ulster.

And will scarlet, this is not 'anti-english' stuff, its histroy and the anglo saxon-english have to face up to what their ancestors have done and how they have weakend the white race with all their wars and invasions. The worst part being or course, bringing black and mud skinned slaves to europe and america and polluting forever those once pure countries. Though to be fair they werent the only ones who did that.

The problem with the english is that they are weak. they bow to a monarch. The accept a caste system. Why do you think America threw off English rule, We whipped you twice and saved you from Germany twice. Get rid of the "peerage" and let the best people rise to the top. If Elton John can be a knight, then any weak homo can.

England was once important, but now it is just a sess pool of foreigners. Even pakis and homos can become knights. Clean up your own house. Without Anerica protecting you, you would be nazis.

The english are romanized. They believe in bizarre life titles. Americans, the scotts, are real celts. We let the best men rise to the top. We do not care who your parents were.

Most of the peerage are people that were traitors. They refused to fight and, in return, got land and titles.

If wour are really WN, you would overthrow the crown and let the best people run your country. Who cares if your homo ancestor buggered some king and got a title. The peerage system is a joke.

We got a Texan in the White House. Kerry is a jew who switched to Caltholism to get ellected. He is STILL a jew no matter what church he goes to. Just wait and see what a celtic American can do. We will clean up the middle east just like we cleaned up Europe and Asia.

Precisely! I don't understand the point he is getting at. What is wrong with having a monarchy? Let's face facts here, if Britain had a President we would need to have an election for that President. Now, of course, the people could choose wisely and elect a good one but then again they could be collectively 'off their rocker' and elect someone like Tony Bliar! or David Beckham! Democracy isn't all its cracked-up to be sometimes, especially if you have a media-manipulated (and we know who does a great deal of that! and dumbed-down electorate and, of course, an elected President can be 'bought' by powerful men/womem with money (which group does this? At least, with an hereditery Head of State there is no possibility of that. Anyway, hardly anyone in Britain votes anymore (our turnout at the last general election was just 59% and there is a strong possibility it could be even lower this time around.