US and China recently announced tit-for-tat tariffs on each other's products

Beijing: India today said it would not take sides in the ongoing trade spat between the US and China as it concluded the key Strategic Economic Dialogue with Beijing during which differences persisted over China's controversial One Belt One Road initiative.

Remarks by NITI Aayog vice-chairman Rajiv Kumar came as he held the fifth Strategic Economic Dialogue (SED) dialogue with his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, the chairman of China's top planning body the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), in Beijing on Saturday.

During the talks, the Belt and Rroad Initiative also came up for discussion.

"India suo motu has been the supporter of the rule-based multilateral trading order. In that sense, we don't have to take sides either one-way or the other," Mr Kumar told the media when asked about India's stand on the current trade spat between China and US.

The SED, a key platform between India and China to discuss trade and economic issues, was resumed this year after last year's disruption amid the Dokalam standoff.

The meeting took place amid growing rapprochement between the two countries after the standoff.

"India has always taken an independent position on trade issues," Mr Kumar told the media.

Soybean is regarded as most important for US farmers and China is the largest importer. China has threatened to impose 25 per cent tariffs on its imports if Donald Trump went ahead with his tariff plan for China.

Elaborating on his stand in asking China to import soybean and sugar from India, he said, "My hint was much more towards agricultural tariffs in China than anything else".

China's agricultural tariffs are high and India's agricultural exports suffer as a result of it.

Asked whether the US-China trade spat is advantageous to India, he said, "If war happens, elephants fight and grass gets affected. We are part of the grass. We don't want that," Mr Kumar said, adding that the US and China being the world's top two economies are giants.

"We are not there yet," he said.

Apparently, China has raised th One Belt One Road Initiative at the SED for which India responded raising its concerns over the sovereignty issue regarding the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as it is being laid through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

Mr Kumar said the Chinese brought up the OBOR issue and the Indian delegation responded by saying it is a matter of sovereignty which cannot be compromised.

The Chinese side "extolled" the OBOR virtue and emphasised how it is "completely nonconflictual and respectful of sovereignty and independence", he said.

"After hearing India's response they chose to ignore it," he said.

But at the same time there was no reference to the CPEC and it is covered in the sovereignty-related concerns raised by India, Mr Kumar said.

"Both sides recognize the differences over the issue. But there is sufficient scope within the defined red lines to take the development cooperation forward," he said.

There was a discussion at the SED about the Bangladesh, China, India, Myanmar (BCIM) corridor. While China says it is a part of the BRI, India says the project predates that.

Mr Kumar said the main focus for India is Asian trilateral highway. The BCIM is a work in progress.

Currently Bangladesh and Myanmar are not interested in it in view of the Rohingya refugee crisis, Mr Kumar said.

China for its part appreciated India's Act East Policy to improve connectivity in the north-eastern states.

He said the core message from the SED was that "we must focus incessantly and unremittingly on the development cooperation possibilities despite differences".

"Major take away for India was that China has expressed interest in joining the International Solar Alliance mooted by India," Rajiv Kumar said.

"It seems we have an opening. If that happens it can be a big shot the arm," he said.

There were some "positive noises" from China on investing in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's scheme for housing for all Indians by 2022.

Mr Kumar said that there was immense potential to set up special clusters for Chinese investments like textiles, leather, food processing, electronic components and pharmaceuticals.