Obama Eligibility/Forgery Plaintiff Reports Anomaly at PACER

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

WHERE WAS CASE ENTRY FOR 9+ HOURS?

by Sharon Rondeau

(May 14, 2017) — On Saturday afternoon, Obama eligibility/forgery plaintiff Cody Robert Judy told The Post & Email that when he attempted to view the status of his case at the federal courts’ PACER website, he received a strange and unprecedented message.

Judy’s lawsuit, which challenges Obama’s presidential eligibility and claims that Judy’s own candidacy was harmed through fraud, was re-filed in late January with the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. When Judge Ted Stewart issued an April 10 order stating that Defendants Barack Obama, the DNC and political action group Organizing for Action (OFA) were not expected to provide a response to the court, Judy appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

He additionally filed an application for a Petition of Mandamus with U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch.

A Democrat presidential candidate in 2008, 2012 and 2016, Judy filed challenges to the eligibility of both Barack Obama and John McCain, Obama’s Republican general-election opponent in 2008. Neither case received a hearing in the courts.

In Judy v. Obama, 14-9396, Judy alleges that Barack Hussein Obama knowingly ran for and served as president and commander-in-chief as a candidate not meeting the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that the nation’s chief executive be a “natural born Citizen.”

Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, HI on August 4, 1961, but a “short-form” birth certificate image, “long-form” birth certificate image, and purported Selective Service registration form have all been declared fraudulent by credible experts.

Neither the short-form nor the long-form birth certificate image contains a visible raised seal from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH), from which they were reportedly obtained.

The long-form image and Selective Service documentation were found fraudulent by a five-year criminal investigation which ended in December, at which time investigator Mike Zullo revealed that two forensic analysts approaching their scrutiny from different disciplines recently arrived at very similar conclusions to his own.

Zullo had first announced in March 2012 that following six months of investigation, probable cause existed to believe that the long-form birth certificate image is a “computer-generated forgery.”

In addition to the mystery behind Obama’s birthplace, Obama claims a father who was never a U.S. citizen, which Judy believes alone disqualifies Obama from being a “natural born Citizen.”

Congress has remained unwilling to investigate why a forgery of Obama’s birth certificate would have been uploaded to the White House website on April 27, 2011 and, similarly, why a fraudulent Selective Service registration form was reportedly issued bearing Obama’s name and mailed to FOIA requesters.

Zullo has called the long-form birth certificate image “the foundational lie” of the Obama presidency.

On a radio show last month, Zullo told the host, “The media won’t even discuss the findings.”

Although unable to proceed with the case in October 2015 when U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, an Obama appointee, refused him in forma pauperis (IFP) status, Judy resumed pursuing his claim in January to include the new information released at Zullo’s December press conference.

On May 8, the Tenth Circuit docketed Judy’s opening brief, but the U.S. Supreme Court, which returned the certified mail receipt to Judy weeks ago, has neither posted his Mandamus request Mandamus nor communicated with him about it.

Judy is awaiting the Tenth Circuit’s decision on whether or not he can proceed with the case in forma pauperis. The same court granted the request when first receiving it in 2014.

Judy described his hours-long fruitless efforts to view his case docket on Saturday morning in an instant message:

I went onto Pacer. I was getting an “error busy” message on my Case in Tenth. 6am – Noon but I could access any other Case. Thought that was strange and wondered if a block had been put on it to keep Media out.

Regarding the error image, Judy said, “That’s what I was getting only on my ‘Appeal Cases.'”

After trying intermittently for approximately five hours, Judy finally reported, “I got through at 3:30pm today.”

“I’ve never seen anything like that before,”Judy observed.

He added that there is “Still no decision on the IFP Status.”

Like Zullo, Judy has expressed frustration that no major media have covered his case. “This is a huge story because we don’t know what it could entail. Everything Obama signed could be undone because it wasn’t signed by a legal president,” Judy said, were the case to be heard and adjudicated in his favor after examining the evidence he presented.

Judy also believes that Donald Trump should focus resources on discovering the origin of the Obama forgeries. “If my case went in a positive direction for me, I think Trump’s feet could be held to the fire,” he said. “Trump has an opportunity if he were to be consistent with what he’s said before.”

As to the question of the meaning of “natural born Citizen,” Judy said:

It’s a huge deal. As [Emmerich de] Vattel detailed, if it’s just the place where someone is born and not his parents’ country, it’s not the person’s country at heart because their parents are teaching them opposite doctrine.

When I was in school, everybody knew what “natural born Citizen” was. It was “born in the country to U.S.-citizen parents.” You had to be American for two generations. That’s why I got so upset about McCain. It has to do with crediting foreign countries. He was born in Panama, and that carries a lifetime mark. That’s where he took his first breath. I’ve always thought that the Founders’ idea was that if you came to America and stuck around long enough, there was a little incentive to marry American, stay American and produce Americans.

[Editor’s Note: The “grandfather clause” consists of the words “or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,” as part of the above-cited section of the U.S. Constitution.]

The question would be, “When did the country start?” Could there have been a “natural born Citizen” in the United States of America under the U.S. Constitution before the Constitution was signed? No; it was impossible. You couldn’t even have had “citizens.” That’s why the Founders had to include themselves in the eligibility clause as “citizens.”

Ambassadors who have children born in the U.S. never expect that their children will be U.S. citizens. You would definitely not want a child born here to ambassador parents representing another country to be president.

The office of the presidency, as far as I’m concerned, should be holy ground. It’s America’s choice. It’s not about kindness; it’s about how it affects our national security.

With Obama, the way he was raised, he expanded our national debt by $10 trillion. Sure, he had a Congress that was agreeing with him that was all based on fear of not being re-elected and losing power. So all this posturing for political correctness has really gotten us into a lot of trouble.

The economic wiping-out of the future generations was something John McCain called “generational theft.” Obama looted the treasury. No one likes to have his future stolen. Our children will not know what hit them if this continues.

This always goes back to the children. There is a reward for those who come to America and stick around. Maybe their children can’t be president, but their grandchildren can be.

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

“For Mr. Montgomery, the difficulty is this: merely being in possession of a plethora of information does not automatically lead one to the conclusion that it was obtained in the way he says it was. Sourcing and vetting the accuracy of his information would be the corroboration of the evidence that would ultimately support his claims. That simply has not happened.”

Cody, Thanks so much for your info and I went to the links and printed the item of Justice
Scalia. As I read the article entitled: Report: Justice Scalia Believed Supreme Court was
being surveilled by Obama (VIDEO) it occurred to me that many occurring events are as
pieces of a puzzle that are starting to be revealed and arranged. Other deaths come to mind
that make me wonder such as Brietbart and Fuddy. And who around Obama met an untimely
demise? It occurred to me the timing and revealing of surveillance of numerous citizens have
links. To me it leads back to Obama or his thugs. Why the surveilling? To protect turf and
aid deception of a USURPER.

As some of us realize the death of Scalia to say the least is/was untimely at best. I don’t recall
that he under went an autopsy. There are those who are evil and think nothing of “taking care of
business”. But, all things will be revealed. They out foxed themselves leaving bread crumbs
to be followed…

At this point Zullo is the wrong person to be bring this forward to congress. The number of mistakes made by the CCP under his direction has ruined his credibility. Time for him to pass the evidence to someone else (Mike Volin?) and let them try to move it forward.

Why doesn’t Pastor Gallups interview Reed Hayes?

ELmo Monday, May 15, 2017 at 6:32 PM

Stanford and Jeff,

Better still, hold a joint press conference with the experts introduced to explain their findings.
Nothing else has worked to this point. IMO Cody is beating a dead horse. Even if he does get the court to review his case – (which the court may take just do to end the endless petitions) the result could be worse than if it were never filed.

There are not currently enough votes on the Court for Cody to prevail (IMO) – and that’s worse than not having the case brought to begin with because it will be precedent and it will throw cold water on the entire eligibility issue if he does not prevail (IMHO as a layman).

A finding to uphold Obama would be a disaster and worse than the case not being brought; hold off as long as possible – until you at least have a fighting chance of success – This court (absent Gorsuch) has already spoken regarding this issue with it’s thunderous SILENCE.!! I has only spoken once – when Thomas said (under oath) “We’re avoiding that one”. Thomas may be a favorable vote but he may also know that if it is heard now it will be defeated.
ELmo

Stanford West Monday, May 15, 2017 at 11:46 AM

Waiting for the mythical unicorn (court of law) to act on the evidence is a waste of time. When he was a sheriff, Arpaio could not get a court to review it. Now that he is a civilian the job is impossible. Short answer no Court will ever review Zullo’s evidence.

As to Congress, here is what Speaker Ryan wrote to his constituents about the birth certificate, “On April 27, 2011, in response to these criticisms, President Obama released the long form of his birth certificate, which was issued by the Hawaii State Department of Health.”

Without the experts evidence, Ryan will not create any congressional investigations. And Zullo said he won’t show congress the experts reports until there are congressional investigations. Classic catch 22. No congressional investigations until you show congress the evidence and no release of evidence until you start congressional investigations.

Playing it close to the vest is a self defeating strategy at this point.

Jeffrey Harrison Monday, May 15, 2017 at 6:30 AM

West, Zullo and his team of investigators have many years in being policemen and investigators. They are not News Reporters. They are trying to do many things in obtaining evidence. Then they are attempting to get it to the next level. That would be getting it to a court of law and those in power to take action on the evidence.

Since Zullo and his team of investigators and supporters have done the heavy lifting and have to be careful with the evidence. This is for safety reason and other concerns.

Some evidence is kept close to the vest for a number of reasons. Safety, security, not letting the media twist it, and to obtain additional info and evidence…

Thus far the media has has enough evidence to reveal to the American People to break this case wide open. Why haven’t they?

Stanford West Sunday, May 14, 2017 at 9:49 PM

“On a radio show last month, Zullo told the host, “The media won’t even discuss the findings.”

This is not surprising as Zullo has kept a tight lid on the two experts. We only have his word for what they said. The media will need more than “Zullo says”before they report on the experts findings.

If he won’t release the actual reports then give permission to the experts to discuss their findings.