While
the aftershocks of last Friday's putrid "Supreme" Court earthquake
ruling that sexual deviants (not 'gay') have a constitutional "right"
to "dignity" and can get married are still rippling across
this country, now is not the time to throw in the towel.

Yes,
useful fools in the media are drooling and that includes mega FOX News
star, Megyn Kelly. She has been a long time supporter of "rights"
for sexual deviants. Why, Miss Megyn is loved by the sexual deviant
crowd! As
for FOX News, that network is not fair or balanced. Not on the issue
of sexual deviants or what I and other writers on NewsWithViews write
about: our disastrous monetary policy, Agenda 21, North American Union,
returning to a limited form of republican (not the Republican party,
for heaven's sake!) government, the push for one world government and
the truth behind keeping black Americans on the plantation. And if anyone
thinks FOX News Network isn't becoming more pro-sexual deviant,
try this on for size:

Bret
Baier Confirms Fox News Asked Him to Pull Out of Catholic Legatus Event
"Update: in an email sent to a subscriber to AFTAH's e-newsletter,
Bret Baier confirmed that his employer, Fox News, had asked
him to pull out as a speaker at the Legatus summit. Baier said he agreed
with the decision. Correction: we failed to note that Cardinal Timothy
Dolan of the Archdiocese of New York joined Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal
as among the original "big-name" speakers who did NOT pull
out of the Legatus event."

While
it greatly pained me, I caught some of Megyn Kelly's show last Friday
evening. A clip of the plaintiff in the case talking about how much
he loved a man. Kelly about swooned when she said, "How can yo
deny that"? or words to that effect.

Well,
Megyn, perhaps you might spend some time on your show talking about
promoting HIV/AIDS and the dozens of 'lavender diseases' spread by homosexuals.
Talk about their health problems like long term bowel movement sex causes
them to wear diapers because they can no longer hold their bowels in
check (Wait Gunny - I Have to
Change My Diaper); don't forget some of them use what is called
a 'butt plug". Sodomy is a national health issue in this country,
yet supporters of sexual deviants and their dangerous lifestyles never
is even hinted at.

As
a matter of fact, if you're a doctor and bring up the subject, the PC
fools out there in positions of power will try to destroy you:

"Dr.
Paul Church, a veteran urologist who has been on the staff of Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center for nearly 30 years, is appealing a board decision
against him, and is planning for a hearing in July on his fight over
his right to warn people that the facts prove “gay” sex
is a dangerous lifestyle. Church, who also is a member of the Harvard
Medical School Facility and has conducted life-saving research on diagnosing
bladder and prostate cancer, told WND, “It is incredible to think
they would be able to silence me and revoke my ability to be on the
staff as a result of my raising valid health concerns over a risky lifestyle.”

"He
continued, “This is almost a fascist effort at mind control.”
The facts, he said, are on his side. “Although it has declined
over the past few decades, two-thirds of all new HIV/AIDS infections
in the U.S. are the result of men having sex with men. Fifty percent
of ‘gay’ men will be infected with HIV by age 50. Those
numbers are out there and they are staggering,” he said. But the
facts that Church has used, from the Centers for Disease Control, appear
to matter little in the case, he suggested."

Here's
a doctor who wants his patient to know that his decision to engage in
bowel movement sex (let's not forget "fisting" where "lovers"
shove their fist up each other's rectum to 'stretch the anus' for more
"enjoyable" sex in each other's poop) has serious consequences
and what happens? He's about to lose his job - just like too many Americans
now driven out of business because of the vicious agenda of sexual deviants
of all flavors. Let's not forget children adopted by sexual deviants
which I consider child abuse:

I
receive some of the most vile hate mail everytime I bring out facts
about sexual deviants (having sex in each other's poop). What they don't
understand is like the doctor above, I want homosexuals to live and
not die a horrible death from AIDS or be forced to wear diapers like
a baby or take a million pills to get rid of their diseases all caused
by their personal behavior. I feel nothing but sorry for people who
have bought into the propaganda they were "born that way".
But, in today's decaying society, that's hate talk.

Nor
do any of the money anchors on any of the networks
talk about the scientific fact that sexual deviants are NOT born that
way. Sexual deviants are not born that way like a person's skin color.
Elton John was once married to a woman. If Elton John was "born
that way" and had no choice in the matter and could only be attracted
to men, he would never have married a woman. Dr.
Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King cannot change the color
of her skin anymore than I can mine.

Dr.
Ben Carson was
eviscerated when he said people go into prison heterosexual and come
out homosexual. The squawking was heard from coast to coast. Queer
sex amongst prisoners across this country is very common. I was channel
surfing one night at a hotel on the road and stopped on a documentary
program about just that. Male and female prisoners both said loneliness
was the biggest factor in having sexual relations with the same sex,
but they weren't "gay". One woman said when she was released
she was going home to her husband "who understood". Unfortunately,
Carson also chanted the old propaganda he doesn't care about a person's
sexual "orientation". Carson has also caved and said it's
now the law.

For
those who read the dissenting opinions, that toxic decision had nothing
to do with the U.S. Constitution. NOTHING. It is judicial activism and
judicial malfeasance at its worst. While I am shocked Chief Justice
John Roberts didn't vote for it, something he said makes him a hypocrite:

"The
founder and president of a coalition of black pastors has called upon
U.S. Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan to recuse
themselves from the same-sex marriage case that is currently before
the high court...“A Justice of the Supreme Court is called on
to avoid the appearance of bias—especially on a highly controversial
and sensitive issue that is currently before the Court,” said
Owens. “And yet, both Justice Ginsburg and Justice Kagan have
taken a public stance in favor of same-sex marriage, even going so far
as to officiate at a same-sex wedding.”

“Not
only is this a breach of ethics, but it calls into question the integrity
of the Court and the supposed balance that the judicial branch is meant
to provide in Constitutional interpretation,” he continued. “It
is beyond objectionable that no action has yet been taken to ensure
that the case will be adjudicated fairly. And so it falls to us, the
people, to take action.”

My
question is: Why didn't Chief Justice John Roberts force those morally
and ethically bankrupt justices to recuse themselves from the case?
It was obvious from their own actions they would not be fair and impartial.
That's one of the things I would press if there is a motion
for a re-hearing.

While
there are many, many excellent articles and columns already written
about that decision and because I know time is in short supply, I think
this one written by two of the very best legal minds in this country
is right to the point:

First,
don't look to Congress because I know sure as the sun shines there are
RINOs who will go to the dark side instead of what is constitutionally
right and possible: Lawmaker:
Congress can halt same-sex 'marriage' in tracks - 'It would make
Obergefell a decision that was never enforced at the federal level'

Roe
v Wade, another "landmark" decision by unelected judges
42 years and 57 MILLION murdered babies in the womb later is still on
the books. HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of dollars have been spent over the
past 42 years by the hardest working Americans you'll ever see called
the 'pro-life movement'. A ton of that money has gone to reelect "conservatives"
to get Roe overturned.

For
all the campaign promises from "I'm pro-life!" incumbents
in the Outlaw Congress election after election after election, that
"law" which was justified by privacy for the female, is still
on the books. Republicans had control of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate
for eight years under Bush, Jr. Did Roe get abolished? No.
All those same incumbents who have received tens of thousands of dollars
in campaign donations for their "pro-life" stand have continued
to do nothing but con their supporters with no intention of overturning
Roe v Wade. Yes, conned them just like any smart street hustler in Vegas.

Don't
pro-life Americans get it yet? Instead of the Outlaw Congress impeaching
the judges who voted to murder unborn babies, they do nothing but wail
out in public. It's no different today and next year those same "conservative"
Republicans will run for reelection with being pro-life as part of their
campaign promises they have never delivered on because the're gutless
cowards.

Prohibition
became "law" in January 1920 through a constitutional amendment.
No more cocktails or a cold beer on a summer day. As history shows,
it was unpopular from day one. Over time and refusal by a lot of Americans
to obey such a "law" (speakeasy's, moonshine and a ton of
violence), prohibition was overturned in December 1933 by the 21st Amendment.

This
is war. As so many religious leaders have strongly voiced over the past
few days: Marriage was NOT created by the U.S. Constitution, Congress
or any state. Marriage between one man and one woman is dictated by
God, not by any government:

Evangelical
leader: 'Battlefield shifts to religious freedom' - Supreme Court
ruling sets stage for litigious action by LGBT activists. "The
Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling only applied to civil marriages, and did
not address churches. Yet the gay rights lobby has been aggressively
pursuing what they claim are equal rights and equal access, taking their
discrimination claims to court with great success."

Leaders
of religious denominations across this country sent letters to the "Supreme"
Court telling them in no uncertain terms: We will NOT comply. Now every
one of them should send a letter on behalf on their congregation to
their state governor, state rep and state senator: We will not comply
even if it means going to jail. We cannot allow sexual
deviant 'marriage' to stand like Roe v Wade has for 42 years.

So
said one pastor and that's what EVERY minister, pastor, deacon and Catholic
priest in this country must do now. Self-identified Catholics in this
country number 72 million. The BIG question is what is the Catholic
Church in this country going to do as a result of that decision? More
talk? U.S.
Catholic Bishops on Same-Sex Marriage Ruling: ‘Profoundly Immoral
and Unjust’. Or, are they willing to get in the trenches with
other religious denominations and raise Hell across this country?

There
are approximately sixteen MILLION Americans who are part of the Southern
Baptist congregations. They must stand with their pastors. Civil disobedience
without violence is not a crime, it is a duty to God
to stop this toxic cancer called same sex marriage.

Civil
disobedience means pastors, ministers and priests across this country
by the thousands must march for God, judicial tyranny and against filth
and sin. Roe v Wade gave doctors permission to murder unborn
babies in the womb. But, there is NO law that says any minister, pastor
or priest must marry sexual deviants - yet. That's why unlike Roe, pastors,
minister and priests are the target and they and the tens of millions
in this country who must stand by them have to stand on the front lines
and refuse to bow down to a rancid "judicial" decision. What
is the federal government going to do? March in with troops and force
pastors, ministers and priests to perform "same sex marriage"?
Oh, no. First thing is to yank their 501(c)(3) tax exempt status which
is the best thing that could happen to churches in this country. Second,
the racially corrupt Department of Justice might come after them and
oh, won't that be headline news.

Sexual
deviants have tried to hijack the civil rights movement who aren't having
it - at least those without a political agenda like one of the most
prominent race baiting whores in this country next to Jesse Jackson:
Statement
from Rev. Al Sharpton Regarding President Obama’s Support of Same-Sex
Marriage. The criminal impostor in the White House was against sexual
deviant marriage in 2008; for it in 2012 for votes. As for Sharpton's
blathering it's about social justice and equality, that is nothing but
more communist propaganda to destroy the family unit of mother and father.
That is the ultimate goal.

Sexual
deviants are not born that way like a person's skin color. Elton John
was once married to a woman. Dr.
Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King cannot change the color
of her skin anymore than I can mine. If Elton John was "born that
way" and had no choice in the matter and could only be attracted
to men, he would never have married a woman.

"Justice
Anthony Kennedy wrote that gay marriage allows two homosexuals to “find
a life they could not find alone.” Then he broke out his acoustic
guitar and sang a rousing rendition of “I’d Like to Teach
the World to Sing.”

"This
is an embarrassment. Our nation's highest court has just upended the
institution of marriage, dismantled the rule of law, undermined the
will of the people, and canceled out the legislative process entirely,
and did so based on the reasoning that gay people want to find a life
together. Maybe they do, but what in the hell does that have to do with
the Constitution? And how was anyone being denied a “life together”
simply because marriage has a definition?...

"Kennedy
went further by bemoaning the fact that traditional marriage condemns
gay people to “loneliness.” Is this man a Supreme Court
justice or Barney the dinosaur? If he's concerned about lonely people,
he can, by all means, go and be their friends. But the Constitution
was not written to ensure that people aren't lonely. Indeed, the loneliness
or unloneliness of an individual is not a legal issue, and it's incredibly
nauseating that I even have to explain that."

The
Obergefell case should never have been accepted by either appeals courts
or the U.S. "Supreme" Court. This column very precisely
outlines more damn court battles costing tens of millions of dollars
to fight a decision that is nothing more than a "legal" hallucination:
Evangelical
leader: 'Battlefield shifts to religious freedom'

Most
Americans favor 'same sex marriage' is being belched all over the stupid
tube and Internet. That's a lie. Thirty states said no when given to
the people to decide. In the case of Iowa, those folks acted with determination
and got the job done:

DES
MOINES — "An unprecedented vote to remove three
Iowa Supreme Court justices who were part of the unanimous decision
that legalized same-sex marriage in the state was celebrated by conservatives
as a popular rebuke of judicial overreach, even as it alarmed proponents
of an independent judiciary.

"The
outcome of the election was heralded both as a statewide repudiation
of same-sex marriage and as a national demonstration that conservatives
who have long complained about “legislators in robes” are
able to effectively target and remove judges who issue unpopular decisions.
Leaders of the recall campaign said the results should be a warning
to judges elsewhere. “I think it will send a message across the
country that the power resides with the people,” said Bob Vander
Plaats, an unsuccessful Republican candidate for governor who led the
campaign. “It's we the people, not we the courts.”

"That
wasn't the first time. In 1986, three California Supreme Court Justices
were ousted in a retention election for opposing the death penalty."
Well done. True warriors.

A
few states have already stood fast and are not issuing any marriage
licenses. Here in Texas, our Attorney General, Ken Paxton, has taken
the right stand: Texas
Attorney General orders clerks NOT to issue Gay marriage licenses.
However, his directive is being ignored in Midland, Texas, 40 miles
west from where I live. The clerks there are issuing marriage licenses
to sexual deviants.

Louisiana
is not issuing licenses. States of the Union do not have to issue
marriage licenses. It is absolutely a Tenth Amendment issue. They can
stop issuing marriage licenses statewide in one day. If ministers, pastors
and priests across this country refuse to "marry" sexual deviants
what's the state going to do? Send in the National Guard and force them?
I suppose a Justice of the Peace could do it, but hopefully they will
refuse. Only a massive, unrelenting backlash is going to stop
this because you can bet the farm next is pedophiles, men marrying
their niece, three men marrying two women, man marries dog or as Justice
Alito ("Supreme" Court) ask: "Why
Not Let 4 Lawyers Marry"? There will be no end to the perversions
if this isn't stopped.

Oklahoma
Bill Would Give Clergy Power Over Marriage Licenses. The bill in
that article can be introduced and passed quickly in states like Texas
that have a Republican majority in the House, the Senate and the Governor
who is also a Republican. While Texas' legislature is now out of session
until January 2017, Gov. Abbott can call a special session and
get it done in one day. However, that will not happen unless
enough Texans and clergy of all denominations burn his phone at the
capitol (or faxes).

While
I hate to do it because it does hurt workers who are opposed to the
sexual deviant agenda, we must in mass boycott companies that promote
the spread of HIV/AIDS and the dozens of lavender diseases that plague
homosexuals. By condoning and promoting sexual deviants that's exactly
what they're doing right along with the U.S. government. I will not
shop at Home Depot and Target to name a few. I won't patronize Starbucks
or any other company no matter how much I want something.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *

First Name

*required
field

God's
law and my soul are more important. I've been doing it since NAFTA was
passed in 1994 over "free" trade. Nothing new for me. You
either stand by your convictions or you have none. I know it's difficult
because the list below are some of the biggest corporations in the world.
However, all they care about is the bottom line and that's where you
can use your consumer dollars to bring change.

Is
America too busy to defend God's laws? Will ministers, pastors, Catholic
priests and bishops stand up to judicial tyranny and refuse to back
down no matter threats from the federal government? Will states (forget
California, NY and others drowning in filth and sin) immediately act
to stop issuing marriage licenses? Pray they do.

[Just
a short note about 9/11. The cost of America's undeclared
"war" (invasion) in Afghanistan has now reached $1 trillion
borrowed dollars - massive debt heaped on us all based on what happened
on 9/11. Regular readers of my column know I continue to press for the
truth about the events of 9/11. Military grade nanothermite is not a
conspiracy theory. It was found and tested from the rubble at the twin
towers. A new, powerful film has been released: The
Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive no compensation,
but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or
give a copy as a present. I've purchased half a dozen copies and given
them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It's very powerful simply
because it's one 'ordinary' man's story who ask a simple question that
led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in
this film that many have never heard about but everyone should.
Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend.]

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets,
Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy
appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican
Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy
isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who
believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.
Devvy is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.

Devvy's regularly posted new columns
are on her site at: www.devvy.com. You can also sign
up for her free email alerts.

But, of course,
it's exactly those scientific findings sexual deviants
don't want in the court room. There goes the bogus "civil rights"
argument as well as the "I was born that way" falsehood -
the main staples of the sexual deviant crowd in selling their toxic
sexual behavior to children, parents, lawmakers and the courts. Strip
away the "born that way" by science and there goes the sympathy
factor. It also pins judges to science instead of religion.