I take away Tome of Memory because I usually only have only 1 to 2 cards to hold.
I use only 1 Scroll of Petals because it seems to be efficient only if it is fully upgraded.
I use 2 Argoreth Flower (fully upgraded) because it can stay alive with the help of Warding Circle and Halting Rebuke. It helps me to generate a lot of mana!

as a side note, this is > 12% chance to get at least one from 4 packs, so the 10% from buying in a tourney is worse if you’re angling for a legendary (but definitely better if you’re looking for a rare.)

>(but definitely better if you’re looking for a rare.)
It is better only if you’re looking for a non-commander rare. (I know this is obvious.)

I’m starting to feel that just because everyone got EASY access to monsters like Pyro Rig lv2, Mayumi lv2 and Gauntlet, people feel entitled to have every strong card for free and with little to no effort.

I thought that this is a deck-building game — the players can use (mostly) the same cards, but with different skill level, to show their strength. But with “stronger players get stronger cards”, I see no future.

Also, monster cards are not the fault of players, they are the fault of devs. If they release spammable monsters, why shouldn’t players use them? Not every players have hours to test and fine-tune their defense / surge decks. (Honestly, I don’t think the devs should release ANY monster cards, no matter easy-obtainable or limited.)

Making Conquest\Faction Wars events will cut out the unfactioned players.

This is not a real problem to me until those event will reward new and\or alterate art cards.

Until now the event with new cards was fair to all Tyrant players and i hope this will remain the same so if a CQ\Faction War event is implemented think of something to let unfactioned players get access to the prizes (maybe with a side event for unfactioned players not available to factioned ones).

When I first learnt to use NETRAT’s EvalDeck and simulate Tartarus Swarm’s deck, for example this one:
(Not exactly this deck, but those decks with high-winrate-low-ARD are deleted.)
I asked “why another Wasteland Skimmer is added as the last card but the AND becomes lower?”.

I agree to SirSebstar, “Prefered ordered” is better than simply “Ordered”. (Actually I like “prioritized order” the best but I think “prioritized” is a difficult word to non-native English speaker.)
1. As there are two words, people will start to think “what is this?”.
2. If explaination will be given when mouse over / next to the option box, some players may take a look at it.

If the word is only “Ordered”, many players may think that they know the meaning and do not look at the explanation.

Hey, do you like games? So do we — that’s what makes Kongregate the best source of free games online. We have thousands upon thousands of free online games, from both one-man indies and large studios, rated and filtered so you can play the best of the best. Read more »