irgo, based on the numbers yes it is downgrade. BUT... when you are racing a spec motor, that numbers is not important.
GT 2.0 LPF at 80 to 440A is adequate enough for stock spec motor.
and the new algorithm in the version 2.0 is the important thing that affects the speed.

BTW, what do you race? onroad/offroad? stock or modified class?

you can decide what you want if you feel enough.
i never blame algorithm,
We all here run them all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave H

I agree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by razzor

Use Photobucket to store your pics and then copy the "img" tab and paste it on the forum.

Settings not really different than GT 2.0, or?
No dynamic timing (ability to set yourself the rpm where the timing change)...?
...

Quote:

Originally Posted by sosidge

The only thing I an see is that they are calling the timing system "DMTS" rather than "AMTS" and that it has suggested settings depending on motor.
Hopefully the software will run on GT2.0 as the program card options are the same.

Well we all know Programming box are for quick settings,

Mandate DMTS adjustment range
example :
if we select
6) 18.75 Deg DMTS
and the optional range would be in (0%-100% and delay).

This may be available on both LCD and PC Software,
of adjustment complex DMTS on Graphics through PC Software,
would be nice.
Adam.

The only thing I an see is that they are calling the timing system "DMTS" rather than "AMTS" and that it has suggested settings depending on motor.

Hopefully the software will run on GT2.0 as the program card options are the same.

The user interface being the same as the GT 2.0, the only difference would be that the 107/110 stock software is further developed with a new version (or will the 2.1 come with 107/110 firmware?).

At least, no additional options for the user to control the settings on the ESC like on for example the GM speedo. I still prefer my GT2.0 before my GM120 for carpet stock racing, but it would have been nice with more possibilities.

I guess we have to wait for more facts from SP to understand if there will be a real difference between using 2.0 and 2.1 ESC for stock racing.

The user interface being the same as the GT 2.0, the only difference would be that the 107/110 stock software is further developed with a new version (or will the 2.1 come with 107/110 firmware?).

At least, no additional options for the user to control the settings on the ESC like on for example the GM speedo. I still prefer my GT2.0 before my GM120 for carpet stock racing, but it would have been nice with more possibilities.

I guess we have to wait for more facts from SP to understand if there will be a real difference between using 2.0 and 2.1 ESC for stock racing.

...

Well we all know Programming box are for quick settings,

Mandate DMTS adjustment range
example :
if we select
6) 18.75 Deg DMTS
and the optional range would be in (0%-100% and delay).

will This may be available on both LCD and PC Software,
of adjustment complex DMTS on Graphics through PC Software,
would be nice.
Adam.

well control settings like others ESC should be added too for additional.
and if we don't like control settings we can return
and load to default DMTS 1 to 8 factory with LCD/PC anyway.

and why not add more wide DMTS like 1 to 9 ?
the Box allowed us to reach 9 on DRRS.

Mandate DMTS adjustment range
example :
if we select
6) 18.75 Deg DMTS
and the optional range would be in (0%-100% and delay).

will This may be available on both LCD and PC Software,
of adjustment complex DMTS on Graphics through PC Software,
would be nice.
Adam.

well control settings like others ESC should be added too for additional.
and if we don't like control settings we can return
and load to default DMTS 1 to 8 factory with LCD/PC anyway.

and why not add more wide DMTS like 1 to 9 ?
the Box allowed us to reach 9 on DRRS.

shawn/adam ?

Irgo, I think I have some problems with your english...not sure I can follow what your write. It sounds maybe like you are describing how a GM Genius Speedo works. On the PC you can change almost any setting (including settings like that timing should change from "y" to "x" degrees when you hit 10000 rpm etc....). You can also save your own custom settings into a file and use later or share with other drivers. On the speedo itself you can select one of 8 pre-programmed settings.

IMO, would have been great if SP would release software for the PC to have the same options. The drivers who would like to play around can do that and the people who want it simple can use the standard pre-programmed setups.

If you mean Travel, don’t think they can be negative (or positive for that matter). Take a look at the picture below of the Travel screen, just make sure the throttle (TH) numbers are 100 %, both H & L (throttle & brake).

Then on the main screen, the bar graphs at the bottom: Middle Th at 0, bottom BR at +100. (don’t know why the BR graph indicator isn’t all the way to the right, mine is, weird)

After calibrating use the main screen BR trim to adjust brakes to your preference (middle thumb button I think?), also the ESC setting box if needed.

Irgo, I think I have some problems with your english...not sure I can follow what your write. It sounds maybe like you are describing how a GM Genius Speedo works. On the PC you can change almost any setting (including settings like that timing should change from "y" to "x" degrees when you hit 10000 rpm etc....). You can also save your own custom settings into a file and use later or share with other drivers. On the speedo itself you can select one of 8 pre-programmed settings.

IMO, would have been great if SP would release software for the PC to have the same options. The drivers who would like to play around can do that and the people who want it simple can use the standard pre-programmed setups.

...

Exactly this our mandate ,

as we seen Cirtix ESC have Programming and
allow us to change Torque limit range to 90%
what ever they said Cirtix ESC can not be Updated.

it's time SP GT user
deserve not just Firmware updates,
but also Option to do software
complex adjustment.

Speed Passion must release it.
i heard Adam/shawn using it
why not us ?