tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-78964658758236409092019-09-14T17:15:55.941+05:30Kumar's BlogKumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comBlogger896125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-81140580439746513932019-09-14T17:15:00.000+05:302019-09-14T17:15:55.922+05:30Changing the narrative<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">Some people are happy to brown-nose their way to promotions, and some feel that resorting to such tactics is beneath them. Some people are happy to bend the rules and manipulate others to achieve their ends, while others feel that resorting to such behaviour is beneath them.<br /><br />While these are extreme examples, everything that we are (or aren't) willing to do in a given situation is based on the narrative in our heads. As Seth Godin often says, "People like us do (or don't do) things like this".<br /><br />We do things that fit the narrative in our heads and don't do things that don't fit the narrative.<br /><br />If things are not going well for you, maybe you ought to try changing the narrative in your heads to let you try an alternate approach.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-54338904969015985572019-09-13T16:27:00.000+05:302019-09-13T16:27:34.307+05:30Historical accounts<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">History is a story that we weave connecting several correlating facts in the most plausible manner. For instance, it is a fact that India attained independence from the British in August 1947. However, the reasons and causes as to why the British decided to grant India independence at that time is mostly conjecture as it is impossible to scientifically prove causation.<br /><br />And for the purposes of understanding what happened such a long time ago, this is good enough an approach.<br /><br />However, when operating companies, historical accounts aren't good enough.<br /><br />In the case of a company, it is a fact that a certain metric moved in a certain direction and is currently at a certain value. However, explaining that movement after the fact is mostly conjecture as all we can do is draw hypotheses from correlations that we observe. If the movement in the metric correlates with the movement in one or a few others, we can draw hypotheses that by moving those other metrics in the future, we can move the metric we are concerned about in a direction that we want.<br /><br />But, it is key to remember that these are only hypotheses and not scientifically proven fact. Yet, I see experienced product people make the mistake of treating this as fact and defining their product strategy around such historical accounts or stories.<br /><br />Explaining history helps us make sense and draw hypotheses to plan future actions. But, they aren't evidence that can be relied upon to definitively act in a similar way and expect a similar consequence in the future.<br /><br />In short, the stories we weave may not be repeatable.&nbsp;</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-63719039261417968782019-09-12T16:33:00.000+05:302019-09-12T16:33:35.025+05:30Frameworks<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">Frameworks are useful to quickly assess situations and problems that we encounter. Frameworks help structure the way we process a new scenario. They help save time as we can easily apply what we had previously done in a similar scenario (or what someone else had previously done in a similar scenario).<br /><br />But the key word is "similar".<br /><br />Once we get used to how effective using frameworks can be, we tend to get carried away and apply them even when the scenarios we encounter are not so similar to the ones based on which the frameworks under consideration were developed.<br /><br />Turning to a framework is easy and seems safe. It is the equivalent of "nobody ever got fired for buying from IBM" back in the '80s. If things go wrong, we can always blame it on the framework. It is a great way to cover our bases.<br /><br />But, in order to be able to make a difference, to come up with a solution or a response that is best suited to the situation at hand, we need to approach it from first principles. We need to understand precisely what is happening and then act accordingly.<br /><br />This is riskier and it might not work. But if it does, it has the best potential for reward.<br /><br />We have algorithms to follow frameworks. The human thing to do is to take the risk and leap, with the possibility of making a difference.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-5850551557005811622019-09-11T17:21:00.000+05:302019-09-11T17:21:35.925+05:30What's the next step?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">I started my year with several goals, some very concrete and some quite vague that needed more details to be filled in along the way.<br /><br />When the goals are vague, it is easy to get into an analysis-paralysis and fail to act on it. This has happened to me with a few goals before when I had first started working on my novel and when I had decided to work on a startup idea.<br /><br />In each case, I went several months without actually doing anything to progress as I kept being sucked into what-if scenarios that resulted in me trying to think through different possible scenarios and how I wanted my approach to evolve.<br /><br />However, what eventually helped me to get started and make progress was to simply define what my next step should be and then to set about doing it.<br /><br />For the novel, the next step was to write down descriptions of the protagonists. For the startup idea, the next step was to describe the first hypothesis I wanted to validate.<br /><br />Identifying the next step made it very easy to act as everything not related to it was stripped out of the equation. I didn't have to bother with the different plot points or all the features the first version of the product should have. I could simply act on completing the next step and then sit down identify the next step after that.<br /><br />And once things are in motion, it gets progressively easier to identify the next step and continue making progress.<br /><br />Without action, a goal remains a dream.<br /><br />And the best way to act without procrastinating is to identify the immediate next step to take.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-85189072343881247752019-09-10T16:29:00.000+05:302019-09-10T16:29:31.296+05:30Don't be "that guy"<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">In his latest book, Side Hustle, Chris Guillebeau writes about "that guy" when it comes to asking people for help. He highlights two examples. The first is about someone that reached out to him on every social media platform within the same hour with the same message. He added a message at the end to say that he just wanted to make sure that Chris saw his message. The second is about a person who kept following up with Chris on a favour he had requested twice a day.<br /><br />Both of these, as well as many other such behaviours, are thoroughly annoying. These are behaviours that can put off even well-intentioned people that want to help.<br /><br />I've been on the receiving end as well as the delivering end of such behaviours, although I have learnt my lesson and haven't been "that guy" in several years now.<br /><br />When we are in need of help, it is very easy to have our worldview centered around us and have unreasonable expectations on those we are seeking help from.<br /><br />When you're asking for help, make the other person feel good, don't guilt trip them or put pressure on them, and thank them for their time irrespective of whether they do or do not end up helping. Always assume the best intention on their part.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-16885496576116261642019-09-09T17:15:00.000+05:302019-09-09T17:15:07.869+05:30Cutting through the noise<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">This is the age of data and every company today takes pride in the fact that they are "data-driven". They measure and track every interaction of their users and they devise complex metrics to explain the behaviours of their users and the impact that has on their business.<br /><br />It is undoubtedly great to measure and track everything that a user does. After all, without observing and understanding what the users are doing, it is impossible to make meaningful improvements to their experience.<br /><br />However, the incredible amounts of data generated in the process can turn out to be a distraction if the noise isn't properly filtered out.<br /><br />There have been many experiments to show that humans (and animals) love to attach explanations to what they observe. This is how they manage to navigate through the world. And this is how superstitions arise. The most famous experiment in this genre is where pigeons were given food at random times, which lead to each of the pigeons picking up superstitions. For example, one would rotate it's head in a particular way when it wanted food, as it had experienced such an action leading to food being delivered before.<br /><br />Superstitions are essentially behaviours that we expect to lead to some consequences where we assume a causal relationship when there isn't actually one. Thus, we knock on wood when someone compliments us, or stop in our tracks when a black cat crosses our path.<br /><br />Dealing with data leads to a lot of superstitions as well.<br /><br />I've seen conclusions being drawn at companies where certain observed consequences are simply being explained after the fact and being treated as 'validated with data'.<br /><br />We only validate something with data when we hypothesize first, design an experiment to test it and then collect and analyze the data coming out of that experiment. When we explain consequences after the fact with collected data, we are merely drawing hypotheses.<br /><br />And yet, I've seen smart people confusing the two, making presentations and defining their future product strategy this way.<br /><br />In product management and in life, if we fail to cut through the noise and scientifically arrive at causal relationships, we might simply be hacking away at the noise and thinking that we are being data-driven when we will only be data-driven in air quotes.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-8846477986033125342019-09-08T12:50:00.000+05:302019-09-08T12:50:11.781+05:30Are you coachable?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">When Jonathan Rosenberg, ex-SVP of Products at Google, was being interviewed for the role of head of Products at Google back in 2001, his final interview was with the legendary Silicon Valley coach, Bill Campbell. And the first question Bill asked him was, "Are you coachable?"<br /><br />Everybody is coachable. The reason being that everybody has the potential to get better. In other words, nobody is perfect. This is why every top athlete has one or more coaches - from Cristiano Ronaldo to Roger Federer. Every top executive has a coach, every world leader has a coach (I'm not sure about President Trump).<br /><br />Even at my gym, I see that the most fit and dedicated people have personal trainers.<br /><br />To Bill Campbell's question, Jonathan initially answered by saying that it depends on the coach and Bill wasn't impressed. So, he recovered by saying that what he looks for in a coach is someone who can tell him what others won't and help him see what he doesn't so that he can go on to become better at what he did.<br /><br />And that's the essence of a good coach. They aren't going to tell us what to do in a situation. They don't have the answers. But, they have the right questions to help us assess any situation that we are in and guide us towards making a decision that is in our favour.<br /><br />In any filed that you are pursuing something, if you can afford a coach, get one. It can be a personal trainer at the gym, or a coach for improving your skills at work (this is usually your manager's job, but if your manager isn't doing it, find someone that does).<br /><br />And if you can't afford a coach, you have several other options. I frequently turn to books, which is easily the next best option. Of course, it is more work on our part to synthesize the literature and take away the right message for us as books aren't personalized. Nevertheless, the time you invest in doing it totally worth it as it has all the benefits of working with a personal coach.<br /><br />But, most important of all, you need to be coachable. That is, you need to have to humility to accept that you have shortcomings that you can improve upon, and you need to be open to new ideas that could potentially help you, even if they are different from what you believe is best today. Only with the right mindset can coaching be effective.<br /><br />So, are you coachable?<br /><br /><i>(Hat-tip to Eric Schmidt, Jonathan Rosenberg and Alan Eagle for putting together Bill Campbell's wisdom in the Trillion Dollar Coach).</i></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-32978468060600256502019-09-07T11:50:00.000+05:302019-09-07T11:50:36.287+05:30They just don't get it<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">If a comedian goes up on stage and his set falls flat, failing to elicit any laughter from the crowd, he can either say, "Tough crowd, they just don't get it!". Or he can work on improving his material and give it another shot.<br /><br />If a consultant gives a presentation and nobody is enthusiastic about his proposal, he can either say, "These people just don't get it!". Or he can work on improving the way he put across his message and give it another shot.<br /><br />"They just don't get it" is equivalent to giving up. It is the equivalent of saying "I've done everything I can and there is nothing more I can do".<br /><br />In some cases, giving up is the right thing to do.<br /><br />But the next time you say this, ask yourself if you're consciously giving up or if you are simply masking the short-comings in your arguments and communication style.<br /><br />After all, if you try a different approach, they just might get it.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-20717514348844684242019-09-06T12:24:00.000+05:302019-09-06T12:24:24.179+05:30Saying no to good opportunities<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">When we don't know what we want, it is very easy to evaluate new opportunities that come our way. We can tell with a certain probability as to whether the new opportunity will be better than the current path we are on or not. We can compare the expected pay-offs (risk) and factor in the switching cost and decide whether to take up the new opportunity or say no to it.<br /><br />When we do know what we want is when it starts to get tricky.<br /><br />As in this scenario, we will not only have to do a similar evaluation of expected pay-offs and switching costs, but also factor in our own conviction about what we want. The question being, is what we want today what we will continue to want tomorrow, next month and next year?<br /><br />The longer the horizon, the harder it is to have a strong conviction about what we want.<br /><br />This makes the evaluation incredibly hard. And as a consequence, we often give up on our conviction and default back to evaluating in the first way by reducing our evaluation to a mere comparison of whether the new opportunity is immediately better than what we have today, acting like the proverbial 'bird in hand is better than two in the bush'.<br /><br />Which is why modern (and ancient) literature is full of characters portrayed as heroes for forgoing good opportunities to stay true to their convictions, even resulting in popular books like 'The power of No'.<br /><br />While I respect people who stay true to their convictions, there is no scientific evidence that such behaviour is better. All the stories and examples quoted to support it reek of survivorship bias.<br /><br />Nevertheless, such stories are inspirational and act as good anchors and role models for basing our own decisions to stick with our convictions.<br /><br />At the end of the day, whether we stick to our convictions or not is only a mental coping mechanism to keep ourselves happy about the decisions we make. And there is no inherent virtue about such behaviour.<br /><br />Yet, a bulk of the society perceives it so. So, it doesn't hurt to stick to our convictions and say no to good opportunities that come our way that aren't aligned with our convictions.&nbsp;</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-52545071241948522492019-09-05T19:48:00.000+05:302019-09-05T19:48:35.020+05:30To those who ask<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">The Harry Potter books have many memorable quotes in them. One that has been on my mind lately is Albus Dumbledore saying, "Help will always be given at Hogwarts to those who ask for it."<br /><br />Our partners, our friends, our managers, our colleagues, they are not mid readers. It is unfair for us to expect them to know what we are looking for and then help us with it. It is unfair for us to expect them to know how we are feeling or what's bothering us.<br /><br />If we need help, all we need to do is ask.<br /><br />Yet, we often refuse to ask for help explicitly. We indicate in a passive way, we talk in metaphors, we give subtle indications, but don't put ourselves out there and ask for help.<br /><br />We do this because we don't want to be vulnerable. Putting ourselves out there and making an ask puts us in a place where the person we're asking can say no. So, we hesitate and behave in a way that can be construed as a request and yet retain plausible deniability.<br /><br />Another reason is that we don't want to come across as weak or incapable of managing to get something done on our own, to deal with a situation on our own. By explicitly asking for help, we are admitting that we are unable to deal with it on our own. So, we hesitate and do it in a way that helps us retain plausible deniability.<br /><br />But, when we overcome this feeling and put ourselves out there, there is a higher chance that we will receive the help we need. And if it is at Hogwarts, that chance turns to certainty.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-42514423163077978772019-09-04T17:56:00.000+05:302019-09-04T17:56:06.059+05:30Patience and forgiveness<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">It is not uncommon to feel wronged. It happens to all of us. Not everything in the world is fair, at least from our own vantage point. Naturally, we all feel wronged and it happens fairly often.<br /><br />And when we feel wronged, we react. Either in the form of writing scathing reviews online (this is more common with products and services we consume) or punching someone in the face (hasn't happened to me yet) or reacting in a passive-aggressive manner or sometimes even becoming disengaged (both of these are more common at the workplace and in relationships).<br /><br />These reactions from us can vary in intensity and aggression.<br /><br />Whenever I feel wronged, how aggressively I react (the intensity of my reaction) is inversely proportional to how long I wait before I act. The longer I wait, the lesser the intensity of my action.<br /><br />Perhaps, this is why the common tactic prescribed to people with a short fuse is to count to ten before they act and send that scathing email or shout at someone (or hit someone).<br /><br />This got me thinking about how forgiveness works.<br /><br />In essence, forgiveness is the postponement of the reaction until such a time that we no longer feel that a reaction is merited.<br /><br />For some actions, we can reach such a point quickly, and such actions are forgiven quickly and easily. For others, it might take us a long time to reach such a point, and these are actions that are not forgiven easily.<br /><br />The probability of achieving a state of forgiveness, then, is inversely proportional to the amount of time we wait before we react to being wronged by someone.<br /><br />Next time, show some patience.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-10169160100125882552019-09-03T10:48:00.000+05:302019-09-03T10:48:48.657+05:30Learning how things are done<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">Seth Godin, in his latest podcast, talks about podcasts. If you're remotely curious about the podcasting industry, you ought to give it a listen.<br /><br />One of the topics he covered in that podcast was the role of advertising in podcasts and the challenges that go with it. He says, and I paraphrase, "If you're working at Kraft foods or Pepsi, and you go tell your manager that you will spend all your marketing budget on sponsoring podcasts, you'll probably not get promoted and lose your bonus. Instead, if you tell her you're spending it on a superbowl ad, you'll be in their good books. Because that's how they've always done it and that's what they understand."<br /><br />While I'll leave you to listen to the podcast on the advertising impacts of this behaviour, I want to draw parallels to how we learn at the workplace.<br /><br />This sort of a behaviour is not just restricted to how marketing budgets are spent at traditional companies. This is how we learn how things are done in any role.<br /><br />When the manager has experience doing it a certain way, more often than not, they expect their reports to do things the same way. This could be how product ideas are validated, how problems are sized, how experimentation is done, how team structures are created, etc. And the reports learn to do things in this manner, whether it is right or wrong.<br /><br />This is where good managers and a good company culture plays a key role.<br /><br />Good managers constantly update themselves on new ideas and changes in the market. They constantly question the status quo with an intention of making it better. Not so good managers only try to copy paste what they have done before into the current scenario, because that is what they understand.<br /><br />A good company culture is one where reports are encouraged by their managers to try out new ways of doing things and prove objectively whether that worked or not to their managers. A good company culture doesn't penalise negative outcomes coming out of good intentions and experiments. Instead, they find a way to add guardrails around such experimentation so that the downside is mitigated. This allows employees to learn new things by doing and making mistakes. A not so good company culture penalises negative outcomes, making the employees extremely risk averse where they learn to do things only in a way that will be seen positively by their manager, and not the right thing.<br /><br />This applies very much to students in a school and kids at home and their upbringing.<br /><br />Learning how things are done is essential to keep getting better at what we do. But, we need to ensure we aren't learning the wrong things.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-86154200871867120552019-09-02T10:59:00.000+05:302019-09-02T10:59:15.332+05:30Your body is a wonderland<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">What's the most expensive thing that you own?<br />What's the cheapest thing that you own?<br />How differently do you treat them when it comes to upkeep and maintenance?<br /><br />If you owned a Ferrari, wouldn't you go out of your way to ensure that you get it serviced at the best places, keep it away from dents and scratches, keep it covered from the dust and grime?<br /><br />Would you go to the same lengths if you owned a Nano?<br /><br />Do you treat your mind and body like a Ferrari? Or a Nano?<br /><br />Your body is a wonderland.<br /><br /><br /><br /><i>(Hat-tip to John Mayer. Although, he had something else altogether in mind when he wrote 'Your body is a wonderland'.)</i></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-44793819073758563962019-09-01T12:54:00.000+05:302019-09-01T12:54:54.239+05:30Taxes and bans<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">It's been a few months since I stopped consuming the news (except for few things on tech and startups). So, once in a while, I read a book that is arguably the equivalent of everything noteworthy that has been in the news over several weeks or months. My last such book was Shashi Tharoor's 'The Paradoxical Prime Minister' which was an account of the five years spanning Modi's first term. And this past weekend, I started reading Chetan Bhagat's essays grouped under 'India positive'.<br /><br />One of the things that stood out was the various bans introduced by the government as well as the raised taxes on items / activities like alcohol, cigarettes and gambling.<br /><br />When the government wants to discourage a certain kind of act in the society, it has two options. One, it can outright ban the activity (or the sale of a product) like it did when it banned liquor shops within five hundred metres of state highways. Two, it can raise taxes on the said item or activity while allowing consumption of it to be legal, thus raising prices for it.<br /><br />Bringing about change involves convincing people to make that change. Thus, when a ban is introduced, nothing is really done to change the mindset of the people or of the society. It simply results in illegal trade of that commodity / activity, with the government incurring additional expenses in trying to enforce the ban. This does little to actually bring about any change. Piracy and marijuana are good examples of this.<br /><br />However, if something is legal and heavily taxed combined with widespread education on the ill effects, then that simply puts these items and activities out of reach for most people. When most people can't afford something, it begins to not be popular to consume, thus reducing peer pressure and social status pressure to do so.<br /><br />Eventually, once the culture shifts enough, people will voluntarily choose not to do it. This is what has happened to cigarette smoking which is progressively lower (and less cool) in younger generations.<br /><br />Taxes and bans work very differently and understanding the nuances helps decide which tactic to employ.<br /><br />Are we setting out to change the culture or are we setting out to impose a restriction?</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-91813613315456608342019-08-31T10:40:00.000+05:302019-08-31T10:40:48.879+05:30On Children<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">I don't normally read poetry, but I picked up Kahlil Gibran's most famous book of poems, 'The Prophet' based on a recommendation and it has been a blissful read so far. One of the poems is called 'On Children' and it goes as follows:<br /><br />Your children are not your children.<br />They are the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself.<br />They come through you but not from you.<br />And though they are with you, yet they belong not to you.<br /><br />You may give them your love but not your thoughts.<br />For they have their own thoughts.<br />You may house their bodies but not their souls.<br />For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.<br />You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you.<br />For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.<br />You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.<br />The archer sees the mark upon the path of the Infinite, and He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.<br />Let your bending in the archer's hand be for gladness;<br />For even as He loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that is stable.<br /><br />This very succinctly sums up some of my own thoughts on the topic.<br /><br />If you haven't read 'The Prophet' yet, I recommend that you do so over the weekend.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-42128457961961153902019-08-31T01:23:00.000+05:302019-08-31T01:23:25.171+05:30Unlimited vacation<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">More companies are introducing unlimited vacation for their employees. This, of course, is on top of flexible work hours where employees are free to choose their own work hours. The idea behind such work place policies is that employees are responsible adults who will decide to do the right thing and not abuse such policies.<br /><br />While it is true that employees decide to do the right thing and don't abuse such policies, recent research has shown that employees don't really prefer such policies.<br /><br />While they sound great in theory, employers (and managers) can make or break the effectiveness of such policies by the cultural norms they prescribe and the precedents they set.<br /><br />In the research, the top reason for employees not preferring&nbsp; such policies is that they don't want to feel guilty about taking more time off than someone else or come in later than most others. And the cultural norms of the work place tend to make them feel guilty when they do so.<br /><br />When someone is taking a vacation, they want to do it in a guilt-free manner. And it is much easier to do that when there is a prescribed quota of vacation days and they are using that.<br /><br />So, now, some companies have started to address this and are giving their employees the option at the start of each year to either choose an unlimited vacation plan or a prescribed vacation plan so that nobody is put in a situation that they don't want to be.<br /><br />This is a great example of how personal choice and inclusive policy making is progressing at the modern work place.<br /><br />I've been reading about work place policy design for best results, remote work and flex work policies at various companies. With the advent of seamless videoconferencing and Slack, I would have expected remote work and flex work policies to be more prevalent. However, that doesn't seem to be the case.<br /><br />I still haven't found convincing reasons as to why that is.<br /><br />What's the policy at your work place?</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-84656777718241485682019-08-29T18:26:00.000+05:302019-08-29T18:26:09.137+05:30The minimalism approach<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">Back in May, nearly four months ago now, I decided to apply the principle of minimalism to the things I spend time and effort on and began de-cluttering my schedule to only focus on things that I really believed would add value to my life.<br /><br />As a consequence, I dropped a few things, and changed my approached to some others. The principle itself has been extremely useful to determine what I sign up for and what I don't.<br /><br />At times, this has been a daunting principle to follow.<br /><br />I'm an active person by nature and don't like it when I have a lot of free time on my calendar. It makes me feel uncomfortable looking at empty slots in my week where I have nothing productive planned.<br /><br />And when I began to be very selective about what I said yes to, such slots began to crop up in my schedule, which was time being freed up from the things I was previously doing but didn't feel very strongly will add much value to me in the long run.<br /><br />However, rather than revert back to piling on things to keep myself busy and moving, I decided to use this as a forcing function to identify new areas that I could invest my efforts on, or to go deeper and get even better at the things I was already focusing on.<br /><br />This approach has been immediately transferrable to my work as a product manager.<br /><br />As a product manager, it is very easy to come up with hundreds of ideas to work on and to get busy actually building and shipping them. However, when we add a forcing function to only work on ideas that have big potential to solve problems or unlock new opportunities for our users, this brings focus and screens out several ideas from the backlog, leaving room for deeper exploration and understanding of user needs that can be addressed.<br /><br />The minimalism approach to product management will ensure we work on the most essential of problems and discard (or de-prioritize) ideas that don't impact that problem. Which will result in quicker progress to solving it by taking out distractions.&nbsp;</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-52184763126560495242019-08-28T12:11:00.000+05:302019-08-28T12:11:33.348+05:30Charisma and character<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">Recently, my parents were looking to purchase something. And the salesmanship they observed in the person trying to make the sale was fantastic. The product was talked up, a lot of hypotheticals were portrayed to make a convincing case, and the courtship was at a high in order to elicit a purchase.<div><br /></div><div>However, when they actually interacted with the product, it was quite underwhelming. A lot of the talk by the salesman appeared to be just that, talk. And the reality was far from what had been originally promised.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>So, they wisely decided to not go through with the purchase.</div><div><br /></div><div>We often encounter this in the products we come across. Flashy advertising and a highly optimized sales funnel that leads to a neglected post-sale experience. I've seen this in products ranging from banking and real estate to subscription based apps and restaurants.</div><div><br /></div><div>This is why customer reviews became so powerful. If a product on Amazon or a restaurant on Tripadvisor / Zomato / Yelp or a hotel on Booking.com / Airbnb don't have great reviews, the number of customers that purchase them drops down drastically.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>This is because customer reviews acts as a reality check on the salesmanship, advertising and pre-purchase promises made. The wider the gap, the poorer the reviews.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>This dual nature is evident in people too, and is reflected by their charisma and their character.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>The charming person that can become friends with anyone they come across is rich in charisma. But, the reality check of whether they can hold up to the first impression they make is a test of their character.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>We tend to value charisma for it's presence and character only in it's absence. Perhaps, we ought to start valuing character for it's presence too.</div></div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-70059789595192131672019-08-27T17:37:00.000+05:302019-08-27T17:37:50.152+05:30More weight<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">If you're looking to grow muscle, then you know that you need to work with progressively increasing weights. As you get comfortable doing a certain number of repetitions with a certain weight, there isn't any growth to be had by continuing to work with the same weight. It is time to progress to the next higher weight.<br /><br />So the goal of someone doing strength training is to be able to pull off more weight. More weight for their deadlifts, more weight for their benchpress and more weight for their squats.<br /><br />This is an easy concept to grasp in the gym. As the resistance is immediate (it is immediately harder to lift a heavier weight), and the reward is immediate (the growth you see in the days after you start lifting heavier weights is apparent).<br /><br />When it comes to our mental capabilities, the strength of our ideas and our execution, our skills at the workplace, our skills in social settings, the concept is harder to grasp. Neither the resistance nor the rewards are immediately apparent.<br /><br />I'm trying to apply the principle of 'more weight' outside the gym too, and especially at the workplace in order to get better at what I do.<br /><br />When I was a kid watching football and when football stars would leave to play for a bigger club seeking a new challenge, I wasn't able to comprehend what they meant by a new challenge. I would just assume that they were moving for the money. After all, why would a player who was the best player on a smaller team playing every game and making an impact move to a bigger club where he would sit on the bench and isn't guaranteed to play every game?<br /><br />I've since grown up to understand that that uncertainty is the new challenge. The player will have to get even better and compete at a higher level and earn his place in the team all over again. And that is what will lead him to grow as a player.<br /><br />At the workplace too, continuing to operate at a level where we aren't stretched, where we aren't pushing the boundaries, means we aren't learning and we aren't growing. It is like lifting weights that we are very comfortable with while doing strength training. That isn't the point of strength training.<br /><br />The goal is always to add more weight, and more weight in all aspects of our life, to continue to push boundaries and to grow.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-44366723264653075422019-08-26T11:14:00.000+05:302019-08-26T11:14:40.260+05:30The best fighter is never angry<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">One of the sayings attributed to Lao Tzu, the founder of Taoism and the author of Tao Te Ching, is "The best fighter is never angry".<br /><br />I wrote a couple of days ago about my Jekyll and Hyde approach to life, and how I'm pushing the boundaries and testing the resistance in my Hyde phase, with the aim of improving things around me for the better.<br /><br />A lot of the time, that need to improve something and raise the bar comes from a place of anger. Anger at unfairness, anger at a lack of ethics, anger at the absence of strong values.<br /><br />However, my efforts are also the least effective when I'm starting from a place of anger.<br /><br />When going into a fight, one-on-one combat, there are two vital aspects to the fighter. One, she needs to take the situation seriously enough to want to make a difference and to want to win. The fight ought to matter to her. And two, she needs to have a calm enough frame of mind to observe and react to the opponent's moves, to be agile enough to adapt to the situation she finds herself in in a logical manner.<br /><br />While anger does a great job of invoking deep emotions that bring with it a deep care for winning and making a change, it completely hinders rational thinking and makes us take risks in a fight that puts us in danger rather than effectively strategise and swiftly react to the opponent's moves.<br /><br />Thus, we need to channel the anger into a desire to bring about change and to take action. But once we are committed to that, we need to let the anger dissipate so that we can fight with a calm frame of mind and be effective at the change we are trying to bring about.&nbsp;</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-81607132576320699392019-08-25T13:34:00.000+05:302019-08-25T13:34:04.914+05:30Get the easy stuff right<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">Arriving for appointments on time.<br />Being respectful in providing feedback.<br />Following through on commitments (not reneging on promises).<br />Improving upon what we did yesterday.<br />Learning from our mistakes.<br /><br />These are the easy stuff. They are completely in our control (most of the time). They are a direct reflection of out inner values and character.<br /><br />Raising funding for our startup.<br />Becoming a bestselling author.<br />Being promoted to CEO of a company.<br />Finishing an Iron Man triathlon.<br />Being voted employee of the month.<br /><br />These are the hard stuff. They are not completely in our control (all of the time). They are not always a direct reflection of our inner values and character.<br /><br />The core of all spirituality is to get the easy stuff right and to leave the hard stuff for the world to determine.<br /><br />More often than not, the hard stuff follows the easy stuff.</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-25403732346265030732019-08-24T10:30:00.000+05:302019-08-24T10:30:45.571+05:30Effective communication<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">One of the most important traits of a product manager is to be user-centric. We should never jump into defining a solution before we have properly understood the problem.<br /><br />Yet, when it comes to communication, we rarely follow this approach. We rarely listen with enough empathy to understand where the other person is coming from, how they view the world and what they're feeling beneath the words.<br /><br />Instead, we jump straight into responding based on the assumptions we have made or on the understanding that we think we have.<br /><br />Effective communicators, like good product managers, first listen with empathy and understand what their audience is saying and feeling and only then provide their own opinion or advice.<br /><br />Do you communicate effectively?</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-22376136845334668072019-08-23T12:32:00.000+05:302019-08-23T12:32:42.226+05:30Jekyll and Hyde<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is a gothic novella by Scottish author Robert Louis Stevenson, first published in 1886. It is about a London legal practitioner named Gabriel John Utterson who investigates strange occurrences between his old friend, Dr Henry Jekyll, and the evil Edward Hyde. The novella's impact is such that it has become a part of the language, with the phrase "Jekyll and Hyde" entering the vernacular to refer to people with an unpredictably dual nature.<br /><br />As I was talking to some friends yesterday, I realized that I've been showing a 'Jekyll and Hyde' personality, oscillating between rebellion and standing up for my principles on the one side and showing conformity and docileness on the other.<br /><br />Influencing people and changing societal culture / tribal culture has been of interest to me, and a deeper reflection and analysis helped me to hypothesize the reasons behind my Jekyll and Hyde behaviour.<br /><br />When we are part of a group, a tribe, a society, we accumulate (or deplete) our social capital based on the actions that we take. When we do something that the tribe we are part of approves of, we increase our social capital. And when we do something against their beliefs and opinions, our social capital decreases.<br /><br />In any tribe, people with the highest social capital are in the best position to bring about change in the tribe. They have enough reserves of social capital to put forth seemingly contrarian or wild ideas for changing the tribe for the better and come away with still enough social capital to continue to be taken seriously and not be ostracised.<br /><br />Whereas, someone with an already low reserve of social capital proposing such ideas will be paving the way for her own demise.<br /><br />My 'Jekyll and Hyde' behaviour fits neatly into this theory.<br /><br />I'm the nice Dr Jekyll when I'm in the phase of building up my social capital, conforming to the tribe, not questioning authority, not challenging the status quo, docile, submissive.<br /><br />But once I have accumulated enough social capital, the evil Mr Hyde comes out putting forth bold new ideas, challenging what I don't agree with, standing up for my principles and striving to bring about positive change in my tribe.<br /><br />Until I deplete enough reserves of social capital to put me close to the tipping point.<br /><br />And the cycle repeats.&nbsp;</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-15022670742463114372019-08-22T14:56:00.000+05:302019-08-22T14:56:59.191+05:30Taking a stand<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">Taking a stand involves committing to a point of view or a course of action and sticking to it in the face of external influence / pressure. It isn't always easy to do as we encounter several forms of external influence and pressure that tries to derail this commitment, ranging from changing circumstances to guilt-tripping and manipulative coercion.<br /><br />While we would expect to stand strong under some of these influences, we would also expect to change under some of these influences, for example, when faced with new evidence that prompts a different point of view.<br /><br />This is where the oft-quoted principle of "Strong opinions weakly held" comes into play.<br /><br />When the stand we've taken is rooted in our core principles, it is easier to ward off external pressure as there is low dissonance.<br /><br />This is why people of religious faith (any religion) find it easy to make certain decisions. They just revert back to their faith to guide them. Similarly, people who believe in equal rights for all make their decisions from that core principle.<br /><br />All religions are fiction. As are all humanitarian values like equality for all, freedom of choice, etc. There is no objective truth to them except that a majority of us wish to follow them and believe in them.<br /><br />Our principles doesn't even have to be in a majority. We just need to really believe in them in order to base our decisions on them.<br /><br />The stronger our faith, the easier we find it to stick to the stand we have taken. This is the 'strong opinions' part.<br /><br />However, the 'weakly held' part is equally important as it ensures we are open to new information and new discoveries that can lead us to change our strongly held principles.<br /><br />I've caved under external pressure and changed my decisions many a time. But what has increasingly helped me to not do that is to strengthen my core principles that I believe in.<br /><br />What are your core principles?</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7896465875823640909.post-22554156578577062822019-08-21T18:10:00.000+05:302019-08-21T18:10:50.207+05:30Purposeful consumption<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">It has become a popular trope today to berate social media consumption and social media apps for their insatiable appetite for our attention.<br /><br />I do this too and I've first-hand observed the incredible benefits of relegating social media to the fringes of my free time. In fact, just last month, I unfollowed pretty much everyone on Facebook and Instagram.<br /><br />While a lot of the talk has been about cutting down social media time and cutting down idle consumption time (Youtube, TikTok, and the like), listening to podcasts, reading articles, reading books, watching documentaries, etc almost never figure in such conversations.<br /><br />I started the year with quantitative goals on "productive" consumption like reading books, listening to podcasts and reading articles. And in the recent weeks, I've started to question that approach.<br /><br />As I explored that thought process, I've tried to draw parallels between passive social media consumption and passive article / podcast / book consumption. While the vast majority engage in the former, a small minority engage in the latter. And it is usually those that engage in the latter that are painting ills about the former.<br /><br />However, the two are not dissimilar unless the latter leads to real action and improvements.<br /><br />The "productive" consumption is only different because it has the potential to be productive. But merely engaging in that form of consumption isn't productive in and of itself.<br /><br />As this realization has dawned on me, I've started to be more purposeful about my consumption so as to curate what I consume to match the actions I can take immediately and the learnings I can incorporate, while skipping over others that do not match that profile. Even when this means I may not hit the initial consumption goals I had set myself at the start of the year.<br /><br />I will explore what this means to me further in the coming weeks and start defining goals around the actions that I want to take and then track back to what I need to learn in order to achieve that and consume accordingly. Which means, I won't have goals like "Read one book a week" in the future.<br /><br />However, I would still like that to be a consequence. If I choose improvement goals that are ambitious enough, I might need to read a book a week (or more) to get there. But the consumption won't be the goal and will be replaced by the learning and improvements the consumption will lead to.&nbsp;</div><div class="blogger-post-footer"><script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-9933378-1");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script></div>Kumara S Raghavendrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17568134898095600366noreply@blogger.com