Judicial review postponed following IRP advice

Published on June 12, 2018 by TCI Team

TCI commentary:

This week, the Institute was set to travel north to Leeds to observe the three day hearing concerning a reconfiguration of hospital services in Huddersfield and Halifax. However, this trip has been postponed possibly until later in the year. Following the Independent Reconfiguration Panel’s (IRP) latest advice, campaigners applied for a ‘stay’ on the Judicial Review. The Trust has until October to submit a statement addressing what work that has been undertaken in respect of the IRP’s recommendation, and campaigners will then decide whether they wish to continue with the Judicial Review. We’ll be keeping an eye on this one!

Article:

A legal challenge to a controversial shake-up of hospital services in two West Yorkshire towns has been postponed.

A three day hearing was due to start today after NHS campaigners were granted a judicial review of the plans for Huddersfield and Halifax. The plan would see Huddersfield Royal Infirmary (HRI) knocked down and replaced with a smaller site. Accident and emergency services for both towns would be centralised at an expanded Calderdale Royal Hospital. Action group Hands off HRI launched legal action against the proposals, which have raised fears over longer journey times to hospital.

But the planned hearing at the High Court in Leeds could be held at a later date after a separate intervention by the health secretary. Last month, Jeremy Hunt effectively vetoed the proposals in a letter to local NHS bosses, saying it was “not in the best interests” of patients.

The plan had been referred to Mr Hunt by Calderdale and Huddersfield joint health scrutiny committee last summer and reviewed by the Government’s Independent Reconfiguration Panel (IRP). The panel’s findings mean NHS bosses are reconsidering the proposals.

Law firm Irwin Mitchell, which is representing the campaigners, said that in the meantime, the judicial review proceedings will be stayed. The plan for NHS services involves an expansion of Calderdale Royal Hospital, more planned procedures being carried out at a new facility in Huddersfield and more services being offered outside of hospitals. The new Huddersfield hospital was originally planned to have 120 beds, but that was reduced to 64.

The Institute cannot confirm the accuracy of this story or confirm that it presents a balanced view. If you feel this is inaccurate we would welcome your perspective and evidence that this is the case.