33 Responses

And here’s the BBC’s own report on the Panorama programme that screened in the past couple of hours:

Lee Gibling said NDS paid for Thoic’s servers and was across all of its hacking and TV piracy.

“Everything that was in the closed area of Thoic was totally accessed by any of the NDS representatives,” he said.

He added that although Thoic was in his name, in reality the website belonged to NDS.

“It was NDS. It was their baby and it started to become more their baby as they fashioned it to their own design.”

Once ITV Digital’s codes were published on Thoic, Mr Gibling said his site was then used to defeat the electronic countermeasures that the company used to try to stop the piracy.

Mr Gibling said new codes created by ITV Digital were sent out to other piracy websites.

“We wanted people to be able to update these cards themselves, we didn’t want them buying a single card and then finding they couldn’t get channels. We wanted them to stay and keep with On Digital, flogging it until it broke."

I used to work in this part of the industry - integrating crypto into settop boxes for various vendors - I've dealt with all the major crypto vendors, including NDS.

They're all a bit paranoid, very hard to deal with, which is I guess is understandable given the business they're in, building a relationship to work with them was always hard - and NDS were always the hardest of them all - story was they originally came out of Mossad's crypto people and still have that whole spy frame of mind. Maybe the dirty tricks side too. Their code sucked as well.

To be fair to Murdoch I think NDS were doing this before he bought them and my impression is that he was blind sided by all this shit hitting the fan.

Echostar (Dish TV in the US) was a customer of NDS's major competitor, they'd had an ongoing range war with the Canadians who were breaking their crypto (at the time legal, Canada because E* didn't provide the required amount of French language content and therefor was an illegal product in Canada - and legally couldn't be stolen) whether NDS was involved I don't know, though I suspect that the Canadians started off without their help (at least when I had this story told to me from E* people - before the NDS revelations - there was no mention of NDS)

They’re all a bit paranoid, very hard to deal with, which is I guess is understandable given the business they’re in, building a relationship to work with them was always hard – and NDS were always the hardest of them all – story was they originally came out of Mossad’s crypto people and still have that whole spy frame of mind. Maybe the dirty tricks side too. Their code sucked as well.

Several other leading Israeli companies in broadcast tech emerged from military and security applications I think -- most notably those behind the motion-tracking products we see in sports coverage.

"This brings an end to this long drawn-out process in which we vehemently denied all allegations of piracy which were made against us over a decade ago," said Abe Peled, NDS Group executive chairman. "Piracy is an issue throughout the industry and injurious to all in the value chain. It is only with the active anti-piracy efforts of companies such as ourselves that the pay-TV industry is able to evolve and continue to enable people to enjoy premium TV viewing."

Any content not available in a Te Reo translation doesn't qualify for copyright.

That would just see a lot of content (or a lot more than present) being denied to NZ. Remember that French is the majority language in a significant part of Canada - the status of Te Reo Māori is nothing like as strong.

I don't think the issue was copyright - there was a court case in which the pirates (aargh!) argued that the US TV had no commercial value in Canada, and that one could not steal something that had no value, and did not deprive the owner of the item. What followed was a burgeoning Canadian trade in pirated smart cards leaking across the border into the US and an ongoing cat and mouse game between the pirates and E*/DTV - I think they basically had crap crypto when they started, these days the pirates have to be able to factor large primes (all they need is one quantum computer .... )

I believe the law has since changed, the US seems to have played the heavy in Canadian politics a lot recently

Well as someone who followed the NDS saga quite closely at the time, I have to say the old 'way back machine' must have been going hard. Old links that give detail to the story have gone from anywhere near the top of search engine results, while the barebones which iterate the fallacy now repeated here, that Vivendi/Canal Plus (for whom the original cards used by ITV Digital were manufactured for) used technology that was already outmoded at the time of implementation is repeated over and over. Unsurprisingly NewsCorp rags such as the FT predominate high up the list.

Remember all the digital TV companies were struggling with hacking at that time - including murdoch's channels. Some readers may remember how easy it was to watch sky in NZ if one fitted a video card to yer PC. The Vivendi/Canal Plus problem was the speed with which the cards were cracked and released following changes to the encryption made to circumvent crackers.

Many of the original, now hard to find articles included testimony from a former 'hacker' turned NDS employee who had to move to Israel because, he claimed, his NDS bosses wanted to work in a country where the US Digital Millennium Copyright type laws against reverse engineering hadn't yet been passed.This bloke also said/claimed that NDS has spent considerable sums, in the millions, buying hardware that allowed the Vivendi/Canal plus cards to be physically scanned to determine embedded code and hard wired security.

The bloke also had the job of uploading the newly decrypted codes to a site in Canada from where the Vivendi hacks were disseminated.Now a decade later who can really remember when a particular protocol became 'too old' especially since many of the victims have been paid off, but it needs to be remembered that this was right at the beginning of the digital TV changeover and the technology was fast evolving. Only if channels had the resources to keep buying upgrades.The worst thing about this sort of piracy (according to NewsCorp when explaining why they went to such lengths when they chased an escapee from a low security englander jail all the way to NZ. The bloke had been convicted of selling forged Sky digital cards) is that not only does the ready availability of cheaper cards compete with the legit product; it devalues the product in the eyes of consumers. "Only mugs pay full tote for ITV Digital" became a meme in england.

As for Panorama's belated coverage, the BBC has made in plain that it will take no prisoners in its battle with News International. The blue started before the last englander election by young James launching attacks on state broadcasters for providing 'free' news.

Kind of ironic since the post Hutton Inquiry BBC News bulletins are tough to tell apart from Fox News Bulletins. John Simpson and Bill O'Reilly are pretty much birds of a feather esp on USuk imperialism.Bring back Stratos/Triangle - whose disappearance strikes as another murky affair. (Forgive pun).

Ah, Mondex! So much hope, so little delivery. And DigiCash was another. This is one reason I print to PDF web stories if I might want them for the future, so that I still have them when they disappear from their sites. Wayback doesn't gather everything :-(

ETA and as for Rupe, the chickens are roosting, and there have been a lot of them over the years...

AUCKLAND– Mondex International is running a public relations campaign to emphasise positive aspects of its security after acknowledging in a confidential document that customers may not be protected if its electronic cash scheme is “compromised”.

Holders of Mondex smartcards will not be protected by Mondex and will not necessarily be able to redeem the value held on their cards if the scheme is successfully attacked, according to an agenda item on security PR prepared for a Mondex board of directors’ meeting in July.

The document, leaked to Computerworld, describes a plan to counter “this obvious weakness” and cites the need to step up security PR in light of “recent events”, namely the series of articles in Computerworld (New Zealand).

Potential adverse impacts on Mondex of fears about its security are listed. These include attacks from consumer groups and pressure on governments “to act to protect the consumer against products like Mondex, either by insisting that Mondex accepts liability or that it is not allowed to be developed”. Mondex also fears adverse impacts on the other brands held by MasterCard, Mondex’s 51% owner.

Six New Zealand banks – ANZ, National, Westpac Trust, BNZ, Countrywide, and ASB – are also shareholders in Mondex and recently confirmed their intention to launch the smartcard-based system in October next year.

“Given our assertion that Mondex is ‘tamper resistant’ and not ‘tamper proof’, any stepping up of PR security must include clear statements of the basis upon which consumers will be protected in the event of a security breach”,” the document says.

“Without these statements, we are in danger of exposing the fact that the system is not tamper-proof, and should it be compromised, we will not protect cardholders."

Ah, good times.

Needless to say, Mondex never launched in New Zealand and the banks walked away from their investment.

Needless to say, Mondex never launched in New Zealand and the banks walked away from their investment.

I think that was the response all over the world, actually. The Swindon trial was their first big one, they also had trials in Isreal and Canada. http://www.mondex.org reckons there were reports of 23 separate trials in the media, but they haven't been able to track them all down.

The pile on from all quarters on Murdoch shows that everyone was just waiting for someone else to make the first move.

This Ray Adams guy certainly kept the memos. All 11,000 of them. The AFR says it's been working on the story for four years -- and I suspect you're right that it figured now, after Panorama had called Murdoch's bluff, was the time to go with it.

General Motors were the ones who lost out. I'm thinking there might be some serious lawsuits. News sold NDS a couple of weeks ago to CISCO for $5bn -- they might be a little pissed about these revelations affecting the value of the business. Again, possible lawsuit? As they own the company, presumably they might have access to a great deal of incriminating material.