Comments on: Restoring the rosters: No. 18 – Oaklandhttp://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/21/restoring-the-rosters-no-18-oakland/
Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.Sun, 02 Aug 2015 18:19:12 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: Alirezahttp://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/21/restoring-the-rosters-no-18-oakland/comment-page-1/#comment-1436
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:27:39 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1042#comment-1436You can bash Beane a bit for trading Andre Ethier for Milton Bradley and Antonio Perez. Then again, most Dodger fans aren’t complaining.
]]>By: Markhttp://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/21/restoring-the-rosters-no-18-oakland/comment-page-1/#comment-1435
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:14:05 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1042#comment-1435I don’t even think Anderson is going to win ROY, but it doesn’t matter he was drafted by AZ; perhaps you should try reading how this roster is made up.
]]>By: Aaron C.http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/21/restoring-the-rosters-no-18-oakland/comment-page-1/#comment-1434
Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:23:10 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1042#comment-1434I love how “Jamarcus” even dropped WAR to come off as the smartest man in the room and he couldn’t read the first sentence at the top of the piece.
]]>By: Asyouwishhttp://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/21/restoring-the-rosters-no-18-oakland/comment-page-1/#comment-1433
Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:10:53 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1042#comment-1433The A’s didn’t draft Anderson. That’s the point.
]]>By: Jamarcus Russelhttp://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/08/21/restoring-the-rosters-no-18-oakland/comment-page-1/#comment-1432
Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:52:16 +0000http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1042#comment-1432Where is Brett Anderson on this roster? Brett Anderson is going to win the AL Rookie of the Year and Cahill has been worth about .3 WAR and Mazz has been nowhere near the level of BA. Awful choice right there, I didn’t even look at the rest of the roster to be honest.
]]>