Stupid Canadians, solving their problems without guns. After all, this guy was in a car, which we know now is an even bigger threat than a loaded gun since it kills way more people every year. Anyone would have been justified shooting this guy to stop a potential rampage. But no, Canadians are non-violent people who would rather let a potential mass murderer live to see another day. No wonder they have such a high incidence of gun related crimes. Everywhere is basically a gun-free zone in Canada. They are basically inviting the mentally ill to mow them down. I'd rather vacation in Rwanda for a month than spend a day in Canada. At least there I'd be safe with my own gun.

I have no idea what this has to do with anything, but I'm annoyed by the false choice that paper represents. He was neither a hero, nor a villain. He was a guy practicing self-defense who maybe went too far.

I have no idea what this has to do with anything, but I'm annoyed by the false choice that paper represents. He was neither a hero, nor a villain. He was a guy practicing self-defense who maybe went too far.

I actually participated in something exactly like this. (And no I wasn't the drunk driver!)

Coming down the highway. It was busy but not congested. Saw an entrance ramp to my right and looked over to see what might be soon merging onto the highway and saw a white BMW m4 run a Honda Civic right off the ramp and down an embankment. I was traveling too fast and was too far over to be of much help to the wrecked driver, but the BMW...well, he kept going as if nothing had happened.

Even after merging onto the highway, only drove at 55. Well, there were several of us who saw what happened, and we surrounded the guy. I was behind him, another in front and a big airport limousine bus to his left. We forced him to merge over. The limo driver got his keys from the ignition and gave them to me to hold until the cops got there.

Going to trial (at which I was to be a witness) I learned that he blew a 0.23. Oh, and this happened at 11:30AM (in the morning). Makes me wonder what his Fark handle is. But anyway, the guy ended up pleading out. And the Honda driver was ok, though the car was totalled.

I actually participated in something exactly like this. (And no I wasn't the drunk driver!)

Coming down the highway. It was busy but not congested. Saw an entrance ramp to my right and looked over to see what might be soon merging onto the highway and saw a white BMW m4 run a Honda Civic right off the ramp and down an embankment. I was traveling too fast and was too far over to be of much help to the wrecked driver, but the BMW...well, he kept going as if nothing had happened.

Even after merging onto the highway, he only drove at 55. Well, there were several of us who saw what happened, and we surrounded the guy. I was behind him, another in front and a big airport limousine bus to his left. We forced him to merge over and stop in the far right lane. The limo driver got his keys from the ignition and gave them to me to hold until the cops got there.

Going to trial (at which I was to be a witness) I learned that he blew a 0.23. Oh, and this happened at 11:30AM (in the morning). Makes me wonder what his Fark handle is. But anyway, the guy ended up pleading out. And the Honda driver was ok, though the car was totalled.

I have no idea what this has to do with anything, but I'm annoyed by the false choice that paper represents. He was neither a hero, nor a villain. He was a guy practicing self-defense who maybe went too far.

I have no idea what this has to do with anything, but I'm annoyed by the false choice that paper represents. He was neither a hero, nor a villain. He was a guy practicing self-defense who maybe went too far.

I have no idea what this has to do with anything, but I'm annoyed by the false choice that paper represents. He was neither a hero, nor a villain. He was a guy practicing self-defense who maybe went too far.