The long-awaited trial could potentially reveal more secrets of Epstein’s alleged sex rings, including the possible involvement of high profile politicians, celebrities, and royalty.

A lawsuit against convicted sex offender and billionaire Jeffrey Epstein is scheduled to begin December 4th in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. If the trial is not further delayed or a settlement is not reached the public may learn more details of Epstein’s disturbing pedophile adventures. Epstein is well known for his connections to many powerful businessmen, politicians, and royalty. Some of his friends include Prince Andrew, Duke of York, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump.

The upcoming trial relates to an ongoing legal battle between Epstein and lawyer Bradley Edwards. In 2008, Edwards successfully sued Epstein on behalf of women who claimed he paid them to massage while he masturbated. All of the women were teenagers at the time.

Court records indicate there may have been up to 40 teenage victims. Despite these disturbing facts, Epstein was offered a non-prosecution agreement which allowed him to plead guilty to the lesser charge of soliciting a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution. He was ordered to pay multi-million dollar settlements to victims and sentenced to 18 months in jail, of which he only served 13.

Epstein was allowed to stay in the Palm Beach County Jail in his own private cell where he was allowed to leave the prison six days a week for “work release”. Epstein was forced to register as a sex offender for life, but with his money and his connections he doesn’t seem too bothered. He currently resides on his private island in the Virgin Islands.

Edwards has been working to convince a federal judge to reopen the investigation into Epstein, alleging that more evidence remains to be uncovered. Edwards was one of the lawyers representing the women who brought the original suit against Epstein. Following Epstein’s plea agreement Edwards filed suit against the U.S. government claiming the feds failed to involve the victims in the settlement, an obligation required by the Crime Victims’ Rights Act.

The women behind the suit state they believe Epstein’s connections helped him get his “sweetheart” prison deal. This speculation may be accurate, especially in light of recently released documents which indicate that Epstein may have cut a deal with the FBI.

Earlier this year the FBI released hundreds of new documents onto their online depository, The Vault. Some of the documents related to the case against Jeffrey Epstein. One memo from September 18, 2008 states:

“On 9/11/08, case agent advised writer that Epstein is currently being prosecuted by the State of Florida and is complying with all conditions of his plea with the State of Florida. Epstein has also provided information to the FBI as agreed upon. Case agent advised that no federal prosecution will occur in this matter as long as Epstein continues to uphold his agreement with the State of Florida. … Case agent is requested to contact writer in the event this matter moves forward on a federal level.”

Additionally, in 2015 Politico reported that court documents released through litigation appeared to show prosecutors cooperating with Epstein’s lawyers to keep the deal secret. Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña used her personal Gmail account to suggest to one of Epstein’s lawyers that they file legal papers in a different jurisdiction as a way to “hopefully cut the press coverage significantly.”

Villafaña told Epstein’s attorney that she would “include our standard language regarding resolving all criminal liability and I will mention ‘co-conspirators,’ but I would prefer not to highlight for the judge all of the other crimes and all of the other persons that we could charge.”

Edwards and Paul Cassell filed a court document in response to the revelations, stating that “the victims’ allegations of a conspiracy between the Government and Epstein’s attorneys to conceal the existence of a broad non-prosecution agreement are not mere speculation, but appear to be well supported.”

The suspicion of improper deal-making is one of the key reasons these women and Bradley Edwards have fought for this lawsuit for the last ten years. Unfortunately, even if the suit does go forward, Jeffrey Epstein will not be attending.

Palm Beach Daily reports that attorney Jack Scarola will have to read excerpts of Epstein’s sworn statements rather than questioning him directly. Epstein previously invoked his 5th Amendment right not incriminate himself and remained silent. Epstein’s attorney Scott Link said Edwards and Scarola are trying to “show what a horrible person Mr. Epstein was” in hopes that “the jury dislikes Mr. Epstein enough to award Mr. Edwards lots of money in damages.”

The claims come from an additional alleged victim, known as Jane Doe #3 or Virginia Roberts. In January 2015, it was reported that Roberts and a Jane Doe #4 filed motions in court seeking to be added to the ongoing case fought by Bradley Edwards.

The women’s allegations match that of earlier victims: Epstein worked with women to lure in young girls who would be paid to massage his back and chest while he masturbated and poked the girls with a vibrator. He often groped the young girls while they gave the massages.

However, the claims of Roberts and Jane Doe #4 went further than the previous women. The motion claims that Epstein was running a “sexual abuse ring” where he loaned out underage girls to “prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister, and other world leaders”.

The Guardian also reports that Roberts claimed the U.S. government was holding back evidence of her time as a “sex slave” for Epstein. Roberts said the FBI and federal prosecutors are part of a “major cover-up”. Although she has been largely dismissed, both in court and by the media, The Guardian notes that Roberts filed previously undisclosed receipts for a flight from New York to Thailand in September 2002 which was paid for by “J Epstein”.

Virginia Roberts claims by the age of 16 she was forced into a life of sexual servitude. She claims to have been brought into Epstein’s “inner-circle”, flying in his private jet to his ranch in New Mexico, his private island, and his mansion in New York. Roberts said she was sexually exploited and assaulted by “politicians, academicians, businessmen”. Epstein settled the lawsuit out of court by paying Roberts an undisclosed sum. Now Roberts is among the women trying to get Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement overturned.

With all the allegations of Epstein being connected to politicians, businessmen, and royalty it’s important to take a moment to highlight some of the people connected to the convicted sex offender.

In January 2015, The Daily Mail reported it had obtained a copy of Jeffrey Epstein’s address book, which contained the list of all his associates. Following the Daily Mail’s report, Gawker released a copy of the address book. The address book came from Epstein’s former house manager, Alfredo Rodriguez, who was arrested in 2009 after attempting to sell it. Rodriguez would spend 18 months in prison before he died in December. He was never able to speak out publicly about the true importance of the names.

Although it is widely reported that both the Clinton’s and Donald Trump have connections to Jeffrey Epstein, the existence of the address book has been ignored. Beyond simply appearing in Epstein’s little black book, Trump was also accused of raping a teenage girl who he met through Epstein.

Katie Johnson, also known as Jane Doe, filed three different lawsuits against Trump in 2016, claiming that she was 13 when she first met Epstein and began participating in sex parties involving older men. Johnson claimed that Trump sexually assaulted her in 1994 at one of Epstein’s parties. She was 13 at the time.

Johnson said she decided to come forward once she realized Trump was running for president. However, in November 2016, Johnson abruptly cancelled a planned press conference in which she was going to reveal her identity and instead withdrew her lawsuit after she said she had received threats on her life. Trump’s attorney claimed there did not exist any corroborative evidence to prove Johnson’s claims.

There is definitely more to this story than what has been released to the public. The evidence points to Epstein using his connections to get out of prison time. He is simply too connected to powerful people to be brought down. And if the allegations are true that Epstein secretly recorded the sex parties he may have plenty of dirt on many of the world’s most powerful people. Hopefully, this December the people of the world will learn the truth and perhaps Epstein’s victims can rest a little easier knowing the truth is out.

Ilya Ehrenburg, the leading Soviet propagandist of the Second World War, was a contradictory figure. A recent article in the weekly Canadian Jewish News sheds new light on the life of this „man of a thousand masks.“ [1]

Ehrenburg was born in 1891 in Kiev to a non-religious Jewish family. In 1908 he fled Tsarist Russia because of his revolutionary activities. Although he returned to visit after the Bolshevik revolution, he continued to live abroad, including many years in Paris, and did not settle in the Soviet Union until 1941. A prolific writer, Ehrenburg was the author of almost 30 books. The central figure of one novel, The Stormy Life of Lazik Roitschwantz, is a pathetic „luftmensch,“ a recurring character in Jewish literature who seems to live „from the air“ without visible means of support.

As a Jew and a dedicated Communist, Ehrenburg was a relentless enemy of German National Socialism. During the Second World War, he was a leading member of the Soviet-sponsored Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee. (At fund-raising rallies in the United States for the Soviet war effort, two leading members of the Committee displayed bars of soap allegedly manufactured by the Germans from the corpses of murdered Jews.)

Ehrenburg is perhaps most infamous for his viciously anti-German wartime propaganda. In the words of the Canadian Jewish News: „As the leading Soviet journalist during World War II, Ehrenburg’s writings against the German invaders were circulated among millions of Soviet soldiers.“ His articles appeared regularly in Pravda, Izvestia, the Soviet military daily Krasnaya Zvezda („Red Star“), and in numerous leaflets distributed to troops at the front.

In one leaflet headlined „Kill,“ Ehrenburg incited Soviet soldiers to treat Germans as sub-human. The final paragraph concludes: [2]

„The Germans are not human beings. From now on the word German means to use the most terrible oath. From now on the word German strikes us to the quick. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill your German with a bullet, kill him with your bayonet. If there is calm on your part of the front, or if you are waiting for the fighting, kill a German in the meantime. If you leave a German alive, the German will hang a Russian and rape a Russian woman. If you kill one German, kill another — there is nothing more amusing for us than a heap of German corpses. Do not count days, do not count kilometers. Count only the number of Germans killed by you. Kill the German — that is your grandmother’s request. Kill the German — that is your child’s prayer. Kill the German — that is your motherland’s loud request. Do not miss. Do not let through. Kill.”

Ehrenburg’s incendiary writings certainly contributed in no small measure to the orgy of murder and rape by Soviet soldiers against German civilians.

Until his death in 1967, „his support for the Soviet state, and for Stalin, never wavered,“ the Canadian Jewish News notes. His loyalty and service were acknowledged in 1952 when he received the Stalin Prize. In keeping with official Soviet policy, he publicly criticized Israel and Zionism.

The Canadian Jewish News further writes:

„ … The recent disclosure that Ehrenburg arranged to transfer his private archives to Jerusalem’s Yad Vashem library and archive, while still alive, comes as a stunning revelation. The reason this information has come to light only now is that Ehrenburg agreed to transfer his archive on condition that the transfer, and his will, remain secret for 20 years after his death. On Dec. 11 [1987], with the 20-year period expired, Israel’s daily Maariv related Ehrenburg’s story…”

The collection includes material about the important wartime Jewish partisan movement. Among the documents in the collection is one concerning a pogrom in Malalchovka, a village near Moscow, which took place in 1959.

This new revelation about one of the most influential figures of the Stalinist regime shows that, whatever he may have said for public consumption, Ehrenburg never privately disavowed Zionism or forgot his ancestry.

Three Israelis were arrested over the weekend in Colombia, along with 15 others, on suspicion of involvement in sex trafficking in the tourist city of Cartagena that included the sexual exploitation of more than 250 women and girls, Israel’s Ynet news reported.

Mosh was deported to Israel after it was discovered that he was part of a group of ex-Israeli soldiers that had turned a small fishing village in Taganga into a “sex and drug den” from their base in a luxury resort, the Benjamin Hostel which was known to locals as “little Israel”.

From “little Israel” Moosh is reported to have run similar clubs exploiting drugs and children in Cartagena, Bogotá, Medellín, Ecuador, Mexico and Brazil. Local residents spoke of their relief following his arrest and deportation last November and thought they had seen the back of the former Israeli soldier.

Colombian authorities said that Moosh had harmed the security of the state and its citizens. Reports identified Moosh who was also accused of a number of other charges including tax fraud, drug offenses and inciting children to prostitution.

Moosh denies any connection to the tourism sex ring and, according to Israeli sources, he is currently waging a legal battle to return to Colombia.

The bust over the weekend followed months of surveillance. Authorities said that it was one of the biggest operations to combat child sex trafficking and forced prostitution in Cartagena. In a statement, the attorney general’s office described the victims as “real slaves of the 21st century”.

Even after his abdication, Tsar Nicholas II remained a symbolic, sacred figure, and therefore his murder could have a very specific ritualist meaning in many senses, His Grace Bishop Tikhon (Shevkunov) of Egorievsk, abbot of Moscow’s Sretensky Monastery and Secretary of the patriarchal commission tasked with studying the remains believed to belong to the Royal Martyrs, told RIA-Novosti.

“No one will deny that the emperor, even after his abdication, undoubtedly remained a symbolic, sacred figure. The murder of the tsar and his family, putting the final stamp on the existence of the hatred of the 300-year Romanov dynasty by the new authorities, was a matter bearing very special ritualistic, symbolic meaning for many,” Bp. Tikhon stated.

To the objection, “What ritualistic meanings could there be for the Bolsheviks?” Bp. Tikhon responded with his own question: “Isn’t Lenin’s mausoleum a sacred, symbolic, and ritualistic phenomenon?” The Bolsheviks and their associates, he added, were by no means strangers to a variety of ritualistic symbolism.

“Many people involved in the shooting, whether in Moscow or in Ekaterinburg, saw in the murder of the prostrate Russian autocrat a special ritual of retribution,” the patriarchal commission secretary added. Many different kinds of people surrounded the event, he stated, from sadistic criminals who wanted to personally torture the tsar and his family, to Yurovsky, the leader of the band of regicides, who later boasted of his role in the murders and felt himself to be someone “who performed a sacred historical mission.”

His Grace’s explanation comes on the heels of his statement at Monday’s conference “On the Murder of the Royal Family: New Evaluations and Materials. Discussion,” devoted to the various studies on the remains, that the majority of those involved in the ongoing scientific examinations believe there is evidence of ritual elements in the murder of Tsar Nicholas II and his family. He stated then that according to Yurovsky, all the victims were divided up between the shooters, but that the tsar’s remains show more bullet holes because “everyone wanted to be regicides,” that is, “for many it was a special ritual.”

His statement sparked controversy in both Russian and outside media, which tied his use of the phrase “ritual murder” to anti-Semitic accusations of previous centuries. Yurovsky himself, an atheist, was ethnically Jewish, while all the other perpetrators were Russian.

The Speaker of the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia Baruch Gorin, for example, was shocked to hear of Vladyka Tikhon’s statement. “For us it is all an absolute absurdity, for a number of reasons… It is shocking,” he told Interfax-Religion on Tuesday.

While stories of ritualistic murders are tied to various cults and religions, Gorin acknowledged, in Russian history and in the history surrounding the Royal Family, the notion of a ritual murder is “absolutely an anti-Semitic myth,” he stated, adding that the killers in question were, in fact, atheists—although, this is certainly a fact of which Bp. Tikhon is aware.

Western media, such as ABC News, picked up on Gorin’s concern, commenting that, “Some Christians in medieval Europe believed that Jews murdered Christians to use their blood for ritual purposes, something which historians say has no basis in Jewish religious law or historical fact and instead reflected anti-Jewish hostility in Christian Europe.” The article does, however, note that Bp. Tikhon himself said nothing about Jews or Judaism.

The Sretensky abbot addressed the topic again today at a press briefing during a break in the working sessions of the Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church which is currently meeting in Christ the Savior Cathedral, explaining that “ritual murder” in the case of the Royal Family is understood exclusively as “revolutionary, Bolshevistic retribution.”

Matters have been worked out with the local Jewish community as well, Bp. Tikhon explained: “I had a conversation with the head of the largest Jewish community in Russia, Alexander Moiseevich Boroda. He called me, I explained our position to him, and, as far as I understood, he was absolutely satisfied by this conversation and explanation—that it had all just been distorted.”

He added that the entire expert commission was “deeply outraged by the disgusting attempts to accuse us of xenophobia and anti-Semitism.” “No one mentioned anything about the nationality or religious affiliation of the shooters,” he said, adding that of the eight shooters, only Yurovsky was non-Russian, but he was not religiously Jewish, according to Interfax-Religion.

The Federation of Jewish Communities even agrees with Bp. Tikhon that the execution of the Royal Martyrs was a symbolic act, but rejects the use of the specific phrase “ritual murder” in relation to this event.

“It is obvious that the execution of the prisoners of the Ipatiev House was carried out by the godless Bolsheviks as a significant symbolic massacre,” Boroda stated today. However, “it is totally unacceptable to use in these processes the historically and ideologically-charged phrasing ‘ritual murder,’ evoking the obvious connotations,” he added.

It was announced today that the Russian Orthodox Church hopes to see the end of the examinations on the Ekaterinburg remains and to come to a decision on their authenticity or lack therefore sometime next year.

At first squint, Harvey Weinstein seems like a very familiar type. Isn’t he the old, same old, another rich, entitled, powerful man with a bad dye job abusing his might to coerce women into sex? Isn’t Harvey just like Roger Ailes, or Bill O’Reilly, or, for that matter, Bill Clinton? But look at the details of the case and you’ll see that the answer is no. Harvey is different. Harvey, sadly, is a deeply Jewish kind of pervert.

Better than perhaps any other author, Roth captured the particular anxiety of the Jewish American man in the twentieth century, finally coming into power but, having not grown up with it, unsure of what he’s supposed to do now. All those years craving unattainable Gentiles, but never before the means to entice them. The result is Alexander Portnoy of Portnoy’s Complaint, a grown man whose emotional and sexual life is still all one big performance piece, just as it had been when he was a teenager and pleasured himself with a piece of liver.

As a boy, Portnoy fantasized about attaining a mythical shiksa goddess whom he nicknamed Thereal McCoy (get it?), who ice-skates “in her blue parka and her red earmuffs and her big white mittens – Miss America, on blades! With her mistletoe and her plum pudding (whatever that may be),” but as a grown-up he graduates to the real woman he nicknames The Monkey. And what does he do to abase her? He has her perform with an Italian whore. Yes, he eventually joins in, but not before they enact a bad movie – not Hollywood, but San Fernando Valley triple-X. And his nickname for her, The Monkey? That comes from an episode in her life, from before Portnoy met her, when a couple swingers picked her up and wanted her to eat a banana while she watched them copulate. For having a past that gets him hot, she gets degraded with an animalistic nickname. Her history as an actor is what he wants her for.

Harvey is cut from the same cloth. Growing up in Queens, he fantasized of fame and fortune, and, once he got them, he struggled to maintain them by building himself into a larger-than-life figure. He yelled at employees like he was a studio boss from the 1920s – the only thing missing was a riding crop. He ran Oscars campaigns like they used to in Old Hollywood. And he harassed women not necessarily to use them as instruments of his pleasure, but to use them as instruments of his power.

It goes without saying that nearly every one of these women – Rose McGowan, Ambra Batillana, Laura Madden, Ashley Judd, etc. – was a Gentile, all the better to feed Weinstein’s revenge-tinged fantasy of having risen above his outer-borough, bridge-and-tunnel Semitic origins. But it turns out there was a Jew(ess) in the bunch, none other than Lauren Sivan, of the potted-plant episode. In that small way, he inadvertently broke out of the Portnoy mold, performing his inadequacies not for the great all-American odeon but for a woman who could be his cousin. Harvey can run from who he is, but he can’t hide.

Yesterday I published a piece on Harvey Weinstein that many found offensive. The analysis I offered was hasty and ill-considered, especially in light of the even graver accusations that were published by the New Yorker this morning. I take this as a lesson in the importance of knowing as much as one can about a given story, and in taking the time to think and feel things completely through before opining. I apologize for not doing so in this case.

The original piece is still up and is achieved here in case they delete it.

Judaism is not merely a “religion,” as many Jews are overt atheists or agnostics, and they do not consider themselves less Jewish for all that. Jewry is also not a race even if it is true that a “trained eye,” most of the time, can recognize a Jewish appearance, that is to say, a characteristic pattern which is the result of their strict observance of endogamy for centuries. Jews see themselves as the “chosen ones” of God, and marriage outside the community is strictly frowned upon. However, mixed marriages do exist and have also helped to renew the blood of Israel during all the centuries spent in the various ghettos where the Jews preferred to live, separately and apart from the rest of the population. The essential condition for such mixed marriages is that the mother be Jewish, since Orthodox Rabbis recognize as Jewish only the child born of a Jewish mother. However, having just a Jewish father or grandparent can suffice for a person to identify completely with Judaism. Jewishness is therefore a “mental race” that has been shaped over the centuries by the Hebrew religion and the universalist project of Judaism.

Judaism is a Political Project

Judaism is essentially a political project. It is important for Jews to work toward the emergence of a world at “peace,” a peace meant to be universal and permanent. It is therefore not a coincidence that this word “peace” (shalom in Hebrew) is found frequently in Jewish discourse worldwide. In the perfect world that they are building, all conflicts will disappear between the nations. This is why Jews have been militating tirelessly for many years for the abolition of all borders, the dissolution of national identities and the establishment of a global empire of “peace.” The very existence of separate nations is considered to be responsible for the triggering of wars and turmoil. so they must be weakened and eventually replaced by a world government, a “one world government,” a “New World Order,” one single world-ruling authority that will permit happiness and prosperity to reign, Jewish-style, on earth.

We find this idea more or less developed both in the writings of certain intellectual Marxists such as Karl Marx himself and the Jewish-French philosopher Jacques Derrida and also in the discourse of liberal thinkers such as Karl Popper, Milton Friedman and France’s Alain Minc. The idea is to unify the world by all means necessary and to generate cultural conflicts that will weaken nation-states. It is for this One World that intellectuals Jews labor tirelessly all over the world. Whether they call themselves left- or right-wing, liberal or Marxist, believers or atheists, they are the most ardent propagandists of the pluralistic society and of universal miscegenation, that is of racial mixture.

Thus, all their strength the Jews – basically, ALL the vocal Jews in the world – encourage non-white immigration into every country in which they are located, not only because the multicultural society is their fundamental political aim, but also because the disintegration of national identity in each nation and the massive presence of anti-white immigrants is designed to prevent the original white population from succeeding in any nationalistic outbursts against the Jewish sway over finance, politics, and the media. All Jewish intellectuals, without any exception, are focused on this question of building the “pluralistic society” and for this they practice constant “vigilance against racism.” In France, influential writers and journalists such as Bernard-Henri Levy, Jacques Attali, Jean Daniel, Guy Sorman, and Guy Konopniki agree on pluralism and anti-racism despite their political divergences in other areas. This obsession, which is very characteristic of Judaism, is also manifested in movies, where many producers and directors are influential Jews. As soon as a film starts defending and promoting interbreeding, “tolerance” and pluralism, we can be sure that the producer of it is Jewish.

Now we can understand better why the former communists and leftists of the 1970s did not have to make such a big leap to become today’s “neoconservatives.” They have merely switched to a different strategy to achieve the same goal: the rule by racially pure Jews over a racially mixed society.

The fact is that after the Palestinian intifada began in October 2000, the Jews in France and the rest of the Western world have realized that nowadays the danger to their interests and their project comes primarily from Islam and from young African immigrants, both Arabic and black. Their aim is to strengthen the modern race-mixing and race-blending society, which they have contributed so much to establish in our country of France. But this mosaic now threatens to break up into separate communities, and this the Jews do not want. They want no separate identities or separateness at all, except a separate Jewish identity and Jewish separateness. Former Marxists in France such as Alexandre Adler, André Glucksmann, and Pascal Bruckner thus support nowadays, along with Alain Finkielkraut, the right-wing, pro-Washington, pro-Zionist party of Nicolas Sarkozy. And yet they have not become French patriots. They react only for the exclusive benefit of Jewry, asking, as American Jews proverbially do on every issue: “Is it good for the Jews ?”

“Tolerance” as a Weapon

The members of the Jewish sect are the most proselytizing people on earth, but unlike Christians or Muslims, who dream of converting all peoples of all races to their faith, the Jews have no plan to convert the world to their own faith, Judaism, but simply to encourage other nationalities to give up their national and religious identities – and live only for the goal of “tolerance.” The unceasing campaigns to blame all Whites for slavery, colonialism, the plundering of the Third World or for Auschwitz have no other purpose than putting the opponent on the defensive, and getting him on his knees not by violence but via guilt. When the Jews are the only people left on earth who are keeping their faith and their traditions, they will finally be recognized by everyone as God’s “chosen people.”

Their “mission” (and Jews frequently use this term “mission”) is to disarm the other peoples, to dissolve anything which is not Jewish or Jewish-controlled, to grind the people down to a powder for making a new identity-free work force, and thus to favor a universal “peace” among the peoples who have no more “divisive” identities.

As their prophet Isaiah said: “The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, the tiger will rest with the kid, the lion and the ram shall live together, and a young child will lead them” (Isaiah 11: 6-9). The Messiah, coming from Israel, and awaited for three thousands years, will establish anew the kingdom of David and will give the Jews an empire over all the earth. And certain Jewish texts explicitly call for this.

Jews are therefore continuously encouraged to campaign, in whatever society they inhabit, in order to promote the unification of the world – and thus to also hasten the arrival of their promised and cherished Messiah. Propaganda is a Jewish specialty, and it is no coincidence that Jews become so influential in all the media. In their hands, the concepts of “tolerance” and “human rights” have become incredibly efficient weapons of white guilt and accusation against the majority culture. In fact, it is not through Jewish-sounding names or a Jewish physical appearance that we can best recognize Jews, but rather from what they write and say wherever they are on earth.

Selective Amnesia and Fabulation

Many Jews, as we know, played an absolutely huge role in the Soviet tragedy 1917-1991 and the thirty million deaths that marked this era. Let us remember that Karl Marx was born into a Jewish family and that Lenin himself had a Jewish maternal grandfather, that Leon Trotsky, the Bolshevik founder and head of the Red Army, was born a Bronstein, while Kamenev (real name: Rosenfeld) and Zinoviev (real name: Apfelbaum) were running the two Bolshevik-conquered capitals of Moscow and St. Petersburg. But the list of Jews who stood out in the mega-crimes of Communism is endless. It must be said and it must be repeated: Jewish officials and Jewish torturers bore a very heavy responsibility in this tragedy. The “perfect” world they concocted and which was supposedly “historically inevitable” turned out from the very beginning to be a nightmare for the Russian population. It was not until 1948 when the Jewish intellectual elite Jewish began distancing itself from the Stalinist government, and this was only because Stalin had launched his “anti-Zionist” campaign, meant to purge pro-Israel Jews from senior leadership positions.

This indisputable Jewish guilt for the gigantic crimes of Bolshevism is now systematically being shoved down the Memory Hole (the phrase from George Orwell’s 1984). In Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s 2002 book Two Centuries Together, the Nobel Laureate and 11-year veteran of the Bolshevik gulag expresses outrage that Jewish intellectuals were still refusing to recognize their ethnic responsibility in the slaughter of millions of Christians. Solzhenitsyn also denounces modern Jews who pose as victims of an “antisemitic” Bolshevik government when that government was in fact heavily Jewish and Jews were among the worst perpetrators.

This selective amnesia is necessary for a people who ceaselessly proclaim their “innocence” of any provocative acts, as we regularly note in their writings, for example in an editorial in Israel magazine of April 2003, “the first Israeli monthly magazine in the French language” written under the name of a certain André Darmon.

He wrote: “To kill a Jew or a child makes God cry, for we are exterminating [in the Jew] the bearer of universal ethics and innocence.”

No less!

With this mindset of absolute innocence Jews cannot conceive bearing any responsibility for their atrocities. Jews are only victims, only “scapegoats” in an evil and hostile world. But very soon the Messiah will punish the “wicked” and will restore the victimized sons of Israel to their full rights.

Nevertheless, in this same Israel magazine editorial, a certain Frederick Stroussi asserted that the Nazi government was worse than the Stalin regime. He quoted the cruelties he claimed were perpetrated by certain SS men. For example, we learn from Stroussi that the Latvian SS man Cukur’s hobby was to toss Jewish babies in the air to shoot them in their head as in skeet shooting. He also writes of other episodes, such as the rape of children by the SS before they killed them. The Second World War has certainly stimulated the fertile imagination of the children of Israel.

Or perhaps this imagination is once again a case of the Jews’ own “projection” syndrome, that is, accusing others systematically of one’s very own crimes as a matter of consistent PR policy: always attack. We know in fact – even if the media never speak about it – that many Jews and their rabbis are involved in the felony crime of pedophilia (see Psychanalyse du Judaisme, 2007).

And murdering a child would seem to be more a Jewish specialty than a characteristic of the SS mind. The revelations of tenured professor Ariel Toaff of Bar Eilan University in Israel – the son of the former Grand Rabbi of Rome – and buttressed in February 2007 by his 147-page, heavily footnoted, scholarly work Pasqua di Sangue [ Blood Passover] – reveals proof of ritual murder among some Ashkenazi Jews (Jews of Eastern European origin).

Emotional Fragility

We outsiders are thus supposed to understand that the sufferings of Jews cannot be compared to those of any others. As a consequence, we are supposed to get as indignant as they do when a serious historian such as Stephane Courtois states (in the preface of his famous Black Book of Communism): “The death of a Ukrainian child of Kulak origin [ from the independent farmer class] who is deliberately forced to starve to death by the Stalinist government is as significant as the death of a Jewish child in the Warsaw ghetto.” These simple words were enough to provoke the ire of Frederic Stroussi who declares he was “stunned” by such an affront. Such a remark, according to him, was “despicable” and represented a vulgar attack against Israel: “What does this comparison have to do here?” he writes. “Why do we have to use the slaughter of a Jewish child to transmit this underlying, false and hateful rumor that the Jews overshadow all other victims of totalitarianism and monopolize all the attention on themselves?”

The author of the article, as we can notice, reacts in a outraged and totally disproportionate way to the modest and certainly justified intentions of the level-headed historian Stephane Courtois. Stroussi demonstrates here the “great intolerance to the frustration” which are so characteristic of the Jewish intellectual. Such reactions are clearly not “normal.”

We note that Israel magazine is a monthly magazine designed for the Jewish community and that, consequently, one can hardly accuse Frederick Sroussi of lying to goyish readers, or hiding from the goyim the true nature of Bolshevism and the supposedly malefic cruelty of the SS. His discourse here does not correspond to any false dialectic, as anti-Semites claim, but here, in this magazine by and for Jews, he is reflecting, as a Jew among Jews, writing to Jews, the very essence of their soul: 1) We are always innocent – and 2) Jewish lives are more valuable than those of others.

There is an “attack anti-Semitism” that stems from a failure to understand the Jewish identity and only sees deliberate perfidy where there is in reality a genuine existential anxiety, one generated by a deep psychological dysfunction.

Hysterical People

The Jews have never dared to collectively approach the mirror on their inner lives represented by Freudian psychoanalysis, a prism through which the Jews claim to see all humanity, but which, on closer analysis, sheds far more light on the specific neuroses of Judaism. Psychoanalysis, like Marxism, is a “Jewish science” and a product of the Jewish mind. It was therefore logical to wonder how this Freudian “discovery” corresponds to Jewish specificities.

The answer was not initially obvious to the author, and it took the reading and analysis of hundreds of books of all kinds, mostly written by Jews themselves, for him to realize that the searing question of incest stands at the throbbing heart of the Jewish question, and not theoretically either.

Jewish mothers do love their sons, as is well known, but outright incest is at the origin of a well-known mental illness – one that especially afflicts Jews – called “hysteria.” Incest attracted early the attentions of Freud while he was developing his theories. The parallels between Judaism and hysterical pathology are quite natural.

Jewry is well-known for these syndromes: Hysteria, depression, introspection, amnesia, manipulation, pathological lying, ambivalent identity, prophetic deception, sexual ambiguity, and so on. Every Jewish symptom is found in hysteria.

Freud, as a loyal Jew, merely projected the traits of a specific community onto the rest of humanity. In reality, there is no “Oedipus complex” but rather an Israel complex (all Jews together technically being Israel, not just the Near Eastern state). In fact, Jews do not seem to really wish to discuss the topic of incest within their families. On the other hand, all the psychiatrists mention: “The hysterical woman so much wants a child from her father or her doctor that she can persuade herself that she is pregnant by one of them and thus develops a ‘nervous pregnancy.’”

It is interesting that all Jewish writers use the same term to refer to the coming of their Messiah, namely, the “delivery” of the Messiah. The whole Jewish community, we must understand, is “the wife of God” (the Shekhinah of the Kabbalist) who is some day supposed to give birth to the Messiah, and thus the whole of Jewry is indeed suffering from a “nervous pregnancy” not unlike that found in nervous, hysterical women.

Karl Kraus, the Austrian Jewish journalist who did not agree with Freud, wrote sarcastically: “Psychoanalysis is the mental illness of which it claims to be the cure.” But the right and the best formula can be stated in ten words: “Judaism is the disease that psychoanalysis is meant to cure.”

The Sexual Revolution

After Freud, other Jewish thinkers came along who produced a symbiosis between Freudian doctrine and Marxism. Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse preached sexual revolution in order to break down the patriarchal family and unleash “free sex.” Their theories largely inspired the student riots of May ‘68. The 1970s saw a new wave of Freudo-Marxism and Jewish women were in the forefront (such as Gisele Halimi and Elisabeth Badinter in France and Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem in the USA). As time passed, a series of Jewish-inspired laws appeared, one after the other, designed to dissolve the family. In France, a Neuwirth-promoted law legalized the contraceptive pill (1967), then came the challenge to the authority of the father as head of the household (1970), then divorce by mutual consent (1974) and the “right” to abortion promoted by “Holocaust survivor” Simone Veil (1975). A great wave of movie porn accompanied this “liberation” from traditional family values. Here we are compelled to note that Jewish producers and film directors play a very important role in the sex film industry. (See my La Mafia Juive [The Jewish Mafia], 400 pages, 2008). Parallel to this, the Freudian concept of bisexuality favored the acceptance of overt “gay pride” and homosexuality.

A War Machine against Humanity

In fact, the only tangible results of this moral “liberation” was the systematic demoralization and criminalization of the white man, who is denounced tirelessly in movies, literature and history as the cause of all the planet’s ills and of the collapse of the West. The appeal of egalitarianism – as intended by Jewry – tends to level all ethnic differences and identities and brings about their slow destruction.

Yitzhak Attia, director of French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem Holocaust institute in Tel Aviv wrote this himself in the same issue of Israel magazine:

Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all Jewry worldwide, not just “the State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities.

You read it right : Between the Jewish people and the rest of humanity the struggle can only be “genocidal and total.” The “peace” which Israel intends to confer is no more and no less than “genocide,” the warrant for the execution of all humanity – except for those allowed to live as cultureless slaves.

The Neutralization of the Devil

The question is whether the aggressiveness of Judaism can be neutralized in order to save humanity from its evils, evils that could prove even more serious than Marxism such as psychoanalysis and the ideology of globalism. First of all, we must face the facts: After all these centuries of mutual misunderstanding, the anti-Semitic Christians, the Muslims, and Hitler have all failed to resolve the Jewish question. The fact is that the Jews feed on and grow off the hatred they have engendered among all the peoples of this world. This hatred, it must be said, is vital for their survival and for their spiritual genetics. It has allowed them for many centuries now to close ranks within their community against an external enemy, while other civilizations have disappeared.

For their part, the rabbis spare no efforts to keep their gene pool Jewish. And so even a renegade Jew remains a Jew, and therefore it is perfectly useless to attempt to leave the Jewish prison community. Judaism is indeed a prison. Claiming that a Jew cannot ever stop being Jewish works in favor of Jewry’s survival.

Our mission must be to accommodate these sick among us, because the Jews are not “perfidious” people as much as they are sick people to be cured.

Jews are to be loved individually and sincerely in order to free them from the prison in which they are locked. Only then will they become free from the cult’s grip – and from the threat they pose to themselves and to all humanity.

Only then we will become free from this grip, and at the same time, they will free themselves from the evil inside them that threatens all mankind.

Nothing better explains Jews and Judaism than the thesis that they are descendants of temple prostitutes.

Imagine a new temple built by the Greeks, Babylonians, or Egyptians. Prostitutes show up. Some of them get pregnant. The children would know their mother, but not their father. The prostitutes bring their daughters into the business. Their children would know their mother and grandmother, but not their fathers or grandfathers. This could go on for several generations. They would trace themselves down a matrilineal line automatically.

Jewish religious law defines a Jew as anything birthed by a Jew. Now we know why.

We can imagine the construction of the pyramids attracting prostitutes. When the pyramids were completed, the business dries up. Jews have to look for new business, elsewhere, creating an Exodus.

This sets up Jewish identity issues: the need for identity, the lack of identity, and a manufactured identity to fill in the hole and even, over compensate, for their lack of identity. Jews are not a created people, but a chosen people. If you have to be chosen, then you’re not an indigenous people. There goes your claims to any land.

Jews spend a lot of time asking who is a Jew, meaning, “who is my father?” They don’t know. It could be anyone, even Satan. After all, anything birthed by a Jew is a Jew.

Being the spawn of temple prostitutes explains the mongrel nature of Jews. Since Jews would be social outcasts, their spawn would inbreed with spawn to produce the mongrel Jewish phenotype. With temple prostitution, we find the in-group/out-group dynamic, nepotism, and ethnic networking.

This is why you see Jews caste in many colors; yet, they constitute a distinct biological group, with well-known dominant, unappealing and embarrassing, common characteristics. Who but the most ugly and unappealing would need to go to a prostitute, anyways? These terrible traits would pass into and down the mother’s line with ease. This line acts as a sewage line for the worst genes to produce the Barbara Spectres of the world.

The legacy of prostitution explains the dominance of Jewish women in the Jewish household, whereas, males are circumcised, and have no productive economic role, except as, parasites on Gentiles. The Jewish prostitute was the bread winner. The lack of masculinity among Jews and a compulsive need to gain resources through subversive non-masculine means: rent-seeking, legal monopolies, management roles, using hype and words, rather than authentic direct conquest, construction, and farming, all point to a prostitution-origin thesis. Besides circumcision, prostitution would explain the need for infant or child sacrifice.

Jews prostituted their wives and daughters in Argentina just in the last 100 years.

Many Jewish women are amongst those who are running the houses. They were not pleased with my visit. They did not like the questions that I asked them or the arguments that I put forward against the continuation of their ‘trade.’”[1]

This thesis explains why Jews are devoid of sexual standards. If you had them, you wouldn’t stay in business.

Jews would not have been raised with sexual standards, but raised to cater to their absence. This would explain the Jewish propensity to debase the wider culture, and bring down sexual and breeding standards. It’s good business. How could temple prostitution survive propriety and concern for racial purity? This would explain why Jews want prostitution legal and why it would produce social chaos in societies without abortion and contraception. This would explain why Jews are run porn and prostitution in recent times and drop the F-bombs liberally in comedy and casual conversations.

The Need for a Jewish Miracle

When people are helpless, they often appeal to a god or gods with power to deliver the impossible, a miracle.

A good example is the Muslim. He grows up under the boot of the pasha or sheik who has a harem. He has no power and no chance of a harem himself, so he appeals to god. His paradise is a heaven with 72 blow-up dolls, virgins who don’t smell or bleed, and who become virgins again and again. This god and this heaven give him a sense of power which he craves and lacks on earth. Likewise, some whites want the impossible. They want to be loved by non-whites. They want a world of peace and love. This is the impossible that attracts weak whites to Christianity. They will grovel to be loved by non-whites who hate their guts. It will take divine intervention for non-whites to love whites in retreat and begging for mercy.

You could imagine a Jew being in line with Dorothy, the Tin Man, the Lion, and the Scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz. They seek a mind, a heart, courage, and an identity from the great Wizard.

God gives Jews the impossible, an identity.

The Jew being of no sure identity needs an identity. For him, god gives him his identity as a “chosen people.”

This is not a biological reality, but an arbitrary compensation and substitute identity. It fills in a huge blank that gnaws at the Jewish psyche. What is a Jew? Where do I come from? Who is my real father? This would explain why it is so hard to pin down the origin of the Jews in any historical way, and why “Luke, I’m your father,” brings Jews to tears.

Jews want racial purity, but they don’t have it. It’s impossible. They created a religion of racial purity to give them the impossible, but a religion of racial purity is lost on mongrels, as are beauty contests.

As children of prostitutes, Jews are a landless people, wandering everywhere, without blood and soil.

The nagging Jewish-feminist is the opposite of silent-masculine warrior cultures.

We know of Jewish envy of blood-Europeans and their hatred of racial purity. It is the one thing all their power and money can’t buy.

Jewish Guilt

You can imagine that prostitutes would be single mothers who would have difficulty disciplining children by force. So they would use guilt as a mind trick to control their children. “Look what your mother has to do in the whorehouse, just to keep you alive.” This gives us the origin of Jewish guilt imposed by Jewish mothers. Because Jews know guilt works so well on Jews; they are masters of using guilt on goy. Indeed, sin and guilt are Jewish constructs unknown in the pre-Christian world.

Jews seem to be fascinated by their parental figure, the tranny Baphomet. What is Baphomet, but a breasted figure with a goat’s head. The breast symbolizes the known mother and the goat’s head represents the unknown fathers who abandoned Jews in ancient times. Jews are the abandoned in search of a father, a messiah. Could their origins be more clear?

Trump’s Shameless Inner Jew

Trump’s fundamental Jewish trait now makes sense. His shamelessness was his key to victory over the Republican castrati and Hillary Clinton. Isn’t Roger Stone a master of the shameless? Trump’s fans mistake his shamelessness for courage. Does it take courage to reference menstruation, grab the p, or suggest incest with one’s daughter? It’s just Jewish shamelessness, i.e., the state of being a moral imbecile, to loosen up the goy, and get them into the whorehouse or casino.

Donald Trump’s ancestor supposedly fled military service only to open up a whorehouse in the gold rush. That’s not so odd, if his ancestor was a Jew. A regular German would probably start a farm. Would he know much about whorehouses or how to run them? Would he find it appetizing to do so? Very unlikely. Trump keeps up the traditions of the underworld with masonry and casinos. He pimped out his “daughter” for a queer laugh.

Trump’s shameless inner Jew suggests a sexual relationship with his daughter. Truly odd, but it makes sense. He prostitutes her before us. He would date his own daughter. Like a Jewish pervert, he debases the culture by grabbing pussy, and gratuitously referencing menstruation (“bleeding from the eyeballs”). Like a good Jew, he degrades the discourse of our society. Jews have done that for decades. Trump has trannies in his beauty contests, and may have a family brood of them. Trump throws sexual and biological matters in our face. The Jew is very strong in Donald Trump. Is this what being in Jew circles does to you, or is Trump a biological Jew? Never forget, he is great friends with “terrific” Jeffery Epstein.

Jewish Oedipus Complex

Consider Jewish boys raised proximate to their mother’s prostitution. If we can read Freud’s Oedipus Complex as a confession, Jews lust to rape their own mothers. Jewish prostitution is the root of the Freud’s Oedipus Complex, which he shifted onto Gentiles to debase them. This complex interplay of sex, guilt, rape, lust for sex with mothers, and projecting it onto others, is best explained by the thesis that Jews are the mongrels of ancient temple prostitution.

The Grecian Oedipus story illustrated the tragic condition of man, where tragic means the failure of man to avert disaster, despite his best efforts, due to his lack of omniscience. Oedipus was not lusting to have sex with his mother. He did everything possible to avert it. Strategy (knowledge) is the effort to beat tragedy (ignorance). He lacked the knowledge, but not the will. He wanted to avoid sex with his mother, stabbing his eyes out at the thought. This is not so of the Jew.

Charlatan Freud shifted and projected his own perverted lusts, lusts that brothel-raised Jews would be familiar with, onto Gentiles. The Jewish lust to have sex with one’s mother is central to Jewish life because prostitution, mongrel identity, and guilt is central to Jewish life. Jewish guilt and lust revolve around the Jewish mother. This is the nexus of the hysteria and incest in Jewish communities that Henri Herve has observed. A prostitution legacy explains the Talmud’s sexual perversions, and the excuses for raping children.

The embarrassing emotional bile generated in Jews raised proximate to prostitution, perhaps watching their Jewish mothers have sex would lead Jewish boys to have twisted sexual feelings for their mothers. Freud’s Oedipus Complex is meant to corrupt the healthy Gentile’s inner life with sick subversion and half-baked accusations that are nothing more than the bile of Jews and their most reasonable origins.

Jews argue that laws against pedophilia are laws against Jews.

Doesn’t that reveal the fundamental nature of the Jew?

Do Americans have a line in the sand, or are they lower than Jews? It would take a people lower than Jews to allow this to march unchecked.

Tranny Baphomet

A Jew’s vision of his parents is revealed in the image of Baphomet, a he-goat with breasts. This reflects the inner confusions of the Jew and his origins down to his very parents. We see the odd emphasis on transvestism among Jews, from the Jew “Jazz” Jennings to “Amy” Winehouse.

Jewish modern art lacks clarity, as does, Jewish identity. Both involve the celebration of biological filth.

We can understand Hollywood in all its depravity and symbolism. Hollywood reveals the bilge and fantasies of the collective Jew.

The Jewish rabbinical cults are an instance of longing to find a father, a messiah figure, a long-awaited missing father. Jewish sociology falls right out of temple prostitution and its psycho-social effects.

Circumcision is central to Jews and “cures” the unclean male. Only Jews could invent the term “toxic masculinity.” The toxic mix of Judaism, circumcision, and incest produces incestuous homosexuality, well-known, among Jews and their rabbis. It’s reported that half of all New York Jews have been ass-raped by Jewish males.

Herve Ryssen’s video mentions that hyper-young marriages between Jews age 12 were an effort to manage the Jewish incest-instinct. Since this incest-instinct doesn’t exist in Europeans, there is no need to marry off girls before they have reached true maturity, mental and physical. What is fit for Jews is not fit for white women.

Incredibly, this video mentions that incest is treated favorably in the Bible drawing a link between ignominy, “hessed,” tender, and pious, in reference to incest. What is disgrace on the surface is piety below.

Effectively, to be hassidic is to be a child molester.

The good thing about Jews is Jewish guilt, but we can’t let them shift that guilt onto us. Ryssen’s work shows Jew mothers and fathers want sex with the sons and daughters; the siblings want sex with each other. Jews are just a pile of nasty. Their social standing in America should collapse as this becomes more widely known.

Effectively, Jews go down the mother’s line and could care less about their father, as you would expect from descendants of prostitutes. They resent masculinity, health, strength, and beauty, yet long for a racial identity. They are the ultimate schizophrenics. You can see why Jews would make a religion of racial purity out of their mongrelized nature. Religion answers the deepest and unattainable desires of a people.

Deep down, Jews are a people with daddy issues.

It seems clear that Jews are a people of the whorehouse. The genesis of Jews is prostitution where temple-sex and money-changing go hand in hand. It makes you wonder why anyone would want to lay claim to being the “real” Jews. You’ve got to be crazy to want all that baggage.

(When a German enters into an ancient Forest, it is to him as when he goes into a Cathedral, astonished by the wonder of Nature. When a Jew enters into the forest, he thinks about how much money he can gain by its total deforestation. That’s the difference between us. -Herman Goering)

Before telling about the dark origins of the Jews, I would like to clarify a few concepts. Whenever I talk about Nature I refer to the Transcendental. Nature is transcendental because it creates Beauty and Beauty transcends morality and reason. Only through the contrast between shadows and lights can a beautiful picture arise.

I will go on and say that it is precisely our ability to hate and love, create and destroy, that makes us human, and everyone who in the name of “humanitarianism”proclaims to reject racism, violence, intolerance and “hate-speech” is in reality rejecting an essential part of what makes us human and he is incapable of feeling love toward humans for what they really are.

This becomes more obvious when we realize that all this “negative” attitudes are necessary for the creation of happiness, progress and beauty.

Racism: Had racism in Nature not existed, we wouldn’t have evolved into humans in the first place (diversity of species appears only trough racial segregation).

Violence: Were a people not ready to defend itself with violence, they would never be taken seriously (not even by a dog) and they would not know neither freedom nor peace.

Hate-speech: Were this people not capable of denouncing, with hate, the bad intentions of their enemies, their cultural and spiritual life would fall into that of animals.

What is our essence, as opposed to Judaism?

While Judaism has a morality based on an all-seeing God, we have the laws of Nature (namely of Evolution and Physics). These are our ideological weapons and the foundations over which our whole world view is built. Beauty and happiness can be produced only through Nature and …

it is natural that a superior race wants to stay apart from other races.

it is natural that we hate the ones who want to destroy Beauty and

it is natural to have a balance between good and “evil”, love and self-assertion, between destroying what already served its purpose and creating something new.

Even trees live in communities and are “racist”. Most of the inferior peoples can accept with optimism and humbleness the fact that there are better races than them, without hating them.

…But not the Jew. Despite of being crooked and lacking in creativity, he feels himself superior to everyone else and the fact that an ugly parasite feels this way is of course is not natural; it goes against the purposes of Evolution.

He would rather destroy the whole universe than admit that he did something wrong or accept that there can be someone better than him.

If we could distillate the essential parts Judaism something like the following appears:

Universal moralities

Individualism

Materialism

These three concepts make a single structure where there is no place for Beauty, talent, Evolution, or the Transcendental. Neither of these three concepts are natural; they are all perversions that lead to the destruction of life. Because they are so essential for the understanding of Judaism, I will take a few lines in order to explain them.

Universal Moralities

Have you ever asked yourself, why did the Church forbid usury to everyone except the Jews, when it was precisely the Jews who were the ones damaging the society with usury? Were they so stupid as not to notice that they were granting them a monopoly on swindle? Since the Jews were not even official part of the society, it was easier to forbid them usury, so why they didn’t do it?

We know from the sources that the Jews were responsible for levying the taxes of the christian church [yes, you read it right “for the Christian church” and NOT “for the Jewish congregation”] and he stood at the door of the church in order to collect the money from the attendants and he even got to decide about the amounts for baptisms weddings and burials (see “Separation and its Discontents” by Kevin Macdonald).

The Catholic Church has always been just a loyal embassador of the Jews

It was also the Church that generously financed the colonial expeditions of the Renaissance and it was the pope who approved the conquest in the name of a worldwide rule of Christ [Globalism], where all races share the same values and exchange freely their goods [Multiculturalism] (“Die Indianerkulturen Altamerikas” by Richard Konetzke)

We know also from the sources that many ideological movements were created and promoted by Conversos [Jews in disguise] leading to Antisemitism and charges of poisoning the morals and culture (also from “Separation and its Discontents”).

It was the same damn story as today. The Catholic church was like the modern US government, which is there to serve the Jews and it was the Jew behind all the ideological movements of the Church, the one who financed the kings, etc.

The same way that in the last century he played the communists vs the capitalists, he played in those times the heretical movements (which were nothing more than Communism) vs the orthodox Church (which was a milder form of Communism, similar to modern Capitalism).

Christianity was the Jewish-Capitalism of those times, that supposedly fought against the heretical movements (which were more radically communist)

He even got to play the persecuted Jew. Already in the Middle Ages he portrayed himself as a kind of social benefactor, who had to go through multiple persecutions and attempts of genocide, solely because of the superstitious bigotry of European men.

So much for history, now let’s turn to the ideology…

The only way in which people could have ever been forced to ignore the laws of Nature is by introducing an all seeing and all powerful god, that dictates morality in a capricious manner. Because of his supposed omnipotence, his morality can theoretically go contrary to all common sense and observable reality.

Don’t waste much time analyzing the ideology of the Jews because all reduces itself to the assumption that there is an objective morality that pleases god, or in our modern secular society, some form of karma is pleased by “selfless deeds”. There is someone observing and controlling. And this all providing karma, God or global government is the force that enables the domestication of humans and the supposed overcoming of the laws of nature.

Jesus’s parable of the seeds and the Speech of the Mountain all have the assumption that evolution doesn’t exist, that all that happens is dictated by a Jewish god. This god is the big brother of Orwell’s novel. It is the hand that spreads the seeds in Jesus’ parable and it is the parasitic race that raises black people among Whites, etc.

We are in the middle of a war between mother Nature and the parasitic Lord of the Hosts. Through patient Evolution Mother nature created the Aryan Race, with all its white geniuses who figured out the laws of nature, while YHWH sent the curse of the jews in order to stop Nature’s holy path of renewal, replacement, progress and diferenciation.

Our societies are suffering from the HIV of Jewish morals; we contracted it during the Middle Ages and it has been developing undetected through a long time until the point when our immune system fails at the invasion of aliens.

Whenever we hear about “racist nazis”, white supremacists, hate-speech, intolerance, etc. it is the virus slandering the immune system of our Race, playing its tricks in order to remain undetected.

Individualism

The problem with Individualism is that humans have never and will never exist outside communities. To judge a person without considering his culture and race is as absurd as evaluating a car just on the basis of its wheels. A man cannot “run” without belonging to a race and to a specific culture.

Homogeneous societies are like virgin forests

To have your own culture and to live among people of the same race is as necessary for the long-term survival, as eating is the case in the short-term. We have seen that all racially mixed societies, without exception, are not self-sufficient and that they exist only thanks to the help of the White Nations (they get money, technology and know-how from White People). We could say that only racially homogeneous nations are really alive.

The difference between a homogeneous society and a multicultural one is analogous to the difference between an ancient forest and a garden in a NY restaurant; the forest is self-sufficient, creative, strong and creates ever more sophisticated forms of beauty through evolution… The garden is sterile and totally helpless, unable to create, to survive without external care.

In a more transcendental level, we know that the human body produces an electromagnetic field, a field of energy that emanates from the whole body. Since a human society is like a body, it follows that some kind of energy field develops in a society. It is this feeling we get when we are in a homogeneous society, the beauty of the culture, which is possible only when all parts resonate in healthy harmony.

It takes a single out-of-tune instrument in order to ruin the biggest orchestra and when we imagine a white society as an inspiring piece of music, it takes just a few Blacks to ruin the beautiful atmosphere of a white society. The damage caused by this dissonance is incalculable; it is no less a crime than destroying an ancient forest and bringing all its inhabitants to extinction in order to build a parking place that in 10 years will be out of use and fashion.

The same that a human body becomes unstable and sick when it is invaded by external cells (and without intervention dies), whenever a white society adopts people of other races the whole cultural atmosphere becomes corrupted…. The society usually dies without artificial maintenance or help from more homogenous societies.

Living Fossils

Every time we see a black man, it’s like seeing a living fossil. We could think of the black race as analogous to a thousand year old body that is being fed in vitro. In normal situations such an untalented race would have already been replaced by more capable ones and the only reason we have so many black people is because of the unnatural, artificial help they get from dumb institutions and people who fall into Jewish morals.

The whole environment is about to collapse because of the over-exploitation of resources and we go on to channel even more resources for a failed race that has no future and that has never been self-sufficient? Instead of letting nature rejuvenate itself by replacing old life-forms, we keep them alive at the expense of the environment, jeopardizing the future of life on this planet.

To have blacks in our societies is like having this one

It might sound paradoxical to say that, after all, Mother Nature did send some kind of savior god in order to rescue humanity from its pitiful existence. This savior god is called the Aryan Race and as he replaces dinosaur races like the Aztecs or the Negroes; he becomes the new humanity and renews its contract with divinity. So much for Jewish morals!

Materialism (from Third Reich to Third World)

Materialism is a prominent part of the Jewish character. This culture of the corporation-man in suits, who prides himself of his sophisticated way of speaking, of wearing expensive clothes, of travelling all the time, of being “international”, finding offensive anything that has to do with natural urges (sex, hunger, hate) and hating everything that doesn’t fit his superficial appearances, etc., is a symptom of the Judaization of our society.

One of the favorite materialistic fantasies of the Jews is a world where all living forms have been replaced by machines. Passengers is just the new film about it.

We could say that, in some sense “the predator”, did really “give us his mind” in order to enslave us (the reader may remember this quote from the shaman in Castaneda books).

If this Judaization continues, Western Countries will look like Latin America; in such race-mixed countries all people with a decent income have become utterly individualistic, and materialistic; they have no interest at all about reality and live their lives through Hollywood films and alcohol.

I find repugnant the idea of living among racially mixed, materialistic people who think of themselves as Jewish pop stars. As ever more sociological studies show, this is not a specific problem of LA, rather this is a symptom of Globalization. Places where people have lost their identity and traditions become easy prey to drugs, TV, food, emotional, and all other kinds of addictions. They don’t care anymore about social projects, finding an elusive identity in Hollywood films and a fake source of self-esteem in money (see “The Globalization of Addiction: A Study in Poverty of the Spirit” by Bruce Alexander Cook)

Without a doubt, the effects of over-individualism and the loss of all human culture are crueler than any kind of racial discrimination, so much that many young people choose suicide instead of living in such a nightmare.

Not Human; Sources of Jewish Ideologies.

The first traces of the Jews, long before the writing down of their “holy” books, reveal a past that is not much more flattering than the present. Many archaeologists believe that the Jews developed from a nomadic people called the Apiru, which are mentioned in the Amarna letters of Egypt:

[..] the Apitu, a group described in the Tell el-Amarna letters of the fourteenth century BcE (as well as other Bronze Age texts) in a variety of unflattering ways. Living outside mainstream Canaanite society, uprooted from their homes, they are sometimes described as outlaws or brigands, sometimes as soldiers for hire.

In one case they are even reported to be present in Egypt itself as hired laborers working on government building projects. In short, they were refugees or rebellious runaways from the system, living on the social fringe of urban society. No one in power seemed to like them; the worst thing that a local petty king could say about a neighboring prince was that “he joined the Apiru.” In the past, scholars have suggested that the word Apiru (and its alternative forms, Ilapiru and Habiru) had a direct linguistic connection to the word lbri, or Hebrew… [The Bible Unearthed; Israel Finkelstein, Ch. 4 – Who Were the Israelites?]

It seems that these problematic tribes were some kind of anarchic rebels who despised settlement, all kinds of rules and who for some reason (as archaeology attests) they decided not to eat pork in order to differentiate themselves from their neighbors. At some point they started to believe fanatically in a strange kind of jealous god, who promised them that they would become rulers of the earth.

We know now that the laws of Evolution apply not only to living beings but also to the whole universe. If Jewish morals go against the laws of Nature it can only follow that the Jews go against the laws of the whole cosmos. Their world view goes contrary to the essence of nature, the Transcendental, the subjective and with it, Beauty and progress, which are replaced with physical gratification; Such an evil force can only come outside this Universe.

Today, more and more physicists adopt the view that we live in a multiverse, that means that there are out there parallel universes. Could it be that the Jews are being inspired by an evil force from another universe?

This idea, as crazy as it sounds came from Rabbi Michael Laitman who in his Israel Nation’s lectures, teaches to other Jews the doctrine (inspired presumably on the Kabbala) that they have a mission that originates outside of this planet. Whether this is real or not, the fact that it comes from another universe would explain why they act so slowly and are having so much difficulties.

It would also explain why there’s disagreement among the Jews. Because of the limitations of the speed of light, it must be extremely difficult to communicate between universes, even with the most advanced technology. They interact in a very circumvented, indirect manner, that leaves much space for “noise’ and interference.

With so much promotion of the replacement of humans with machines and the fact that the Jew doesn’t seem to care about the irreversible destruction of Nature (its not that he doesn’t know, he is aware and nevertheless that doesn’t disturb him), I can only imagine that we are only a means to an end, and as soon as we have advanced enough machines all living forms in this planet will be replaced with robots.

How do they do it and why the Jews? I really don’t know, it may be related to their genes, but all I know is that even if they are being manipulated against their will, a globalist Jew has no cure.

IT MIGHT BE WISE for someone to find out which of the people who have recently been much in the news have ever gone to a party on, or paid a visit to, Little Saint James in the US Virgin Islands. The island, now often called “Sex Slave Island,” is about 140 km east of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and it is owned by billionaire Jew Jeffrey Epstein, a sex offender who has been convicted of molesting children. He received a 13-month nighttime-only sentence in a resort-style prison, a mere slap on the wrist for which he can probably thank his Jewishness, along with a “non-prosecution agreement” from the federal government for any further charges.

One of the ways to keep a politician under control and a slave to your agenda is to get kiddie-sex blackmail on him. Every “private” room in Epstein’s Pedophile Fun House was reportedly equipped with video cameras and recording equipment. It is likely that the Clintons, as detestable as they are, aren’t the ultimate root of the evil that afflicts American society. It might be Jews like Epstein. After one visit to their spider lairs, your elected official will never again be a free man, and his loyalty will never again belong to his constituents.

It might be the case that so many of our Washington politicians have come under the blackmailing thumb of Jews that none of them dares denounce any of the others, not even as a gambit for winning a close election, for fear of having fingers of blame pointing right back at him. Should one of our elected officials actually be innocent of raping children at these little-known Jewish-owned resorts, he would likely be silent also, fearing to provoke any of the guilty into sending assassins after him.

Jeffrey Epstein has a number of cover activities going on. His island has a medical research institute and some sort of forum where physicists and astrophysicists sometimes gather to hear lectures and the latest theories about gravity and the universe and stuff.

Part of Jeffrey Epstein’s “facilities” on Little Saint James Island

But his main interest is probably his pedophilia and blackmail business. Those other things, expensive as they might be, are probably only sideshows. That is, assuming that my guess is right about why so many of our politicians act so strangely servile toward Zionism and other Jewish causes, once they get to Washington DC.

The (privately owned – by Epstein) island would be the preferred place to rape children. There’s lots of ocean around it to prevent the little sex slaves from running to the police. While pedophile rape does happen in the continental United States, and while some of the rapists are, I think, political officials, keeping the business under wraps would be more difficult, more risky.

For a long time, I thought that Jewish influence came about purely through their control of the mass media and by their choice about where to bestow the huge Jewish slice of the available donated funds that political candidates need for campaigning. But it might easily be true that there is this extra source of Jewish pressure. It would make sense, and it would fit the pattern of behavior that Jews have been observed to have in other places.

What I’m writing about how Jeffrey Epstein and/or other Jews might be corrupting and blackmailing US legislators and US executive branch officials is – at this point – only speculation. But having speculated this far, I’ll go a little further.

Jeffrey Epstein

Sooner or later, those children who have been or may be being exploited on Little Saint James Island reach their 18th birthdays and become useless to Epstein’s hypothetical blackmail racket. What do you suppose happens to them then? They never seem to show up here in the states. And it would be very unlike a Jewish criminal to support goyim cattle just on charity. So, just maybe, each former rape-boy and rape-girl, upon becoming a young adult, is told that he or she is going for a trip to the United States, to be enrolled in a good university, all tuition and expenses paid courtesy of that noble patron, Jeffrey Epstein. They board a yacht and set sail. About halfway to St. Croix, the youth is murdered, weights are tied around his or her ankles, and the body is tossed overboard, into the sea. Or so I imagine.

Both Bill Clinton and Donald Trump have had the acquaintance of the pedophile Jew, Jeffrey Epstein. That same thing is probably true of many other Democrat and Republican office-holders – and former ones. Some of these – perhaps even most – may have taken the bait and are blackmailable. Because the guiltiness is shared around to the extent it is, rivals in an election don’t dare use the relevant accusations, since they would be returned. And most likely there are hit-men in waiting for any official who is innocent and threatens to expose some other official who is guilty.