I'm not blaming Obama for things he doesn't have access to anymore, I'm simply saying if Susan rice knows about the "intel" gathered incidental then
Obama should know about it to probably that seems like something the National Security Advisor might want to brief the president on, right?

Ok good 1 time when the leader of our country vascillated on his so called red line that kept moving thanks for pointing that out I must have missed
that interview. I'm not be mean I do mean that in the nicestvway possible

Ok good 1 time when the leader of our country vascillated on his so called red line that kept moving thanks for pointing that out I must have missed
that interview. I'm not be mean I do mean that in the nicestvway possible

Really? Because it looks like you are arrogantly dismissing the very evidence you asked me to provide because it contradicts your chosen narrative.

When are you going to address the fact that Trump has NEVER admitted blame for anything in his life and that pattern continues into the Presidency,
Mr. Nice Guy?

Ok good 1 time when the leader of our country vascillated on his so called red line that kept moving thanks for pointing that out I must have missed
that interview. I'm not be mean I do mean that in the nicestvway possible

Really? Because it looks like you are arrogantly dismissing the very evidence you asked me to provide because it contradicts your chosen narrative.

When are you going to address the fact that Trump has NEVER admitted blame for anything in his life and that pattern continues into the Presidency,
Mr. Nice Guy?[/quote

Ok krazyshot you got me buddie, but I still love you, but do you concede that Obama did pass the buck on more then one occasion? As almost all
presidents have done.

I've already admitted to this when I said he only did it during his first term and only when it actually applied to Bush. For instance for the economy
he inherited. The economy was the chief thing he would blame Bush on.

If Trump make a policy decision I disagree with then true to pass the buck you bet your ads I will call him on it, nice talking with you crazy you
make well articulated points and have sound reasoning I look forward to more of this in the future, gotta go for a bit

Or is it all really just stagecraft to get the fraction of the population that be CT'ers on board with a POTUS for the first time? That's some
conspiracy theory there!

Could be but I pick the former. It's too organic around the edges, to me, if that makes sense. If Trump caves and goes after Assad then, yeah
maybe.

I mean if you're going that far, then they could be publicly "Killing" the C.I.A inc because the rogue faction of it is too see through and has so
much blood on it's hands so they sheep dip only to continue under other IC Black Op instruments.

However, I'm convinced Trump has studied JFK's foreign policy. Erik Prince has shared that our foreign policy is failing. He would know because the
CIA have been employing his Orgs for black ops nation toppling and various dirty deeds. They probably have back-channeled Russia to get around the
crazy deep state Generals and bureaucrats and avoid WWIII. Last gasp chance to do what JFK saw necessary and shatter it into a thousand pieces and
scatter them to the winds.

I'm not blaming Obama for things he doesn't have access to anymore, I'm simply saying if Susan rice knows about the "intel" gathered incidental then
Obama should know about it to probably that seems like something the National Security Advisor might want to brief the president on, right?

Depends.. prob wouldn't be rice who actually briefed the president, and incidental stuff where no crime has been commited wouldn't warrant including
the president.

Obviously the FBI would prob brief him on the fact they were investigating trump to see if he was involved in the DNC leaks, but why would you spent
valuable time going over incidental data that didn't lead anywhere??

How long would every intel briefing be if they told the president everytime they didn't find anything...

The meeting would be 20,000 "we found nothing on person A"

And 3 "we actually did find something on person B."

So you would just cut out all the times you didn't find anything and would only brief him when you did find something.

More than any of that though, Trump was under legit FBI investigation..

So they most likely had a right to tap him..

All the stuff about unmasking and wiretapping by obama is to try and deflect from the actual real life investigation..

If there was no investigation and trump had been tapped he would have a point.. since there was a legal investigation that the FBI even admitted to
in congress.. then that opens to door to any surveillance being legal and only a bad story for trump.

If Trump make a policy decision I disagree with then true to pass the buck you bet your ads I will call him on it, nice talking with you crazy you
make well articulated points and have sound reasoning I look forward to more of this in the future, gotta go for a bit

You cool with Sessions saying the Trump administration was going to go after recreational pot??

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.