Aims to defend the basic inherited Judao/Christian tone and fabric of Australian society at the national level (culturally not doctrinally). Aims to use persuasion and information to eliminate the threat of political Islam. Will engage in activism to prevent the expansion of any illegal activity aimed at expanding Islamic influence, and will seek to influence Law in pursuit of those aims. We will also highlight the threat of Green/Socialist undermining of Aussie society and Law.

koala-1

The Pen is mightier than the sword, but the Pen must sometimes move the sword against corruption if the corrupt are not moved by the pen.. An idea without an implementer is useless. "The Rulers do not carry the sword in vain"Rom 13:4

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

The Painful Macro-Economic Policy that Australia needs.

I'll use must my own state Victoria as an example.

Imagine.... the treasurer rocks up to Cabinet and says..."Folks.. I've got $500,000,000 surplus.. what would you like to do with that?" My intuition tells me that with almost absolute certainty, the only thoughts that would arise in the minds of these political parrots is.. "What can I do with that to ensure my re-election next time".

But how does a Nationalist think ? I'm referring to a Nationalist who does not believe for a microsecond in the shabby, sloppy, drooling, greedy opportunistic 'adversarial two party system' that we are currently cursed with.

Here is how he thinks:

With $500 million dollars, we can establish import replacing pilot schemes for a number of industrial or agricultural sectors. For example

Australia Imported 193,000 tonnes of seafood imported in financial year 2008/9, some 250
species/ products from aquaculture and wildcatch fisheries, had a
landed cost of $1.3 billion and

an
estimated final sales value of $4.5 billion.

Is it not worthwhile considering the establishment of a massive aquaculture scheme in Australia to reduce our reliance on imports...provide jobs..and move toward an export situation? Such a scheme must be insulated from any and all organized labor (which will not exist under my Government) and must make use of all technology that can give our production a 'competitive advantage' to cite David Ricado. If such a project cannot be implemented WITH a competitive edge.. there is no point in attempting it. Projects without the possibility of a competitive edge are the play things of party politics and greedy people. (see below..Tri Continental)

Where would such wonderful money come from ? (the 500Mil)...it's really easy... it would come from 4 yrs of fiscal pain.. to repay our $50,000,000,000 (50 billion) debt...(when I say 'pain'...I mean PAIN). Then, as if by magic, we would have the INTEREST of $500,000,000 that we are currently paying free for use in actually benefiting the State rather than the electoral prospects of scurrilous Politicians.

Older Victorians will remember the economic travesty of the Labor led demise of the State Savings Bank of Vic...when it used it's political power to manipulate the Tri Continental investment arm of the State Bank to fund various 'bad loans'... as John Cain once said.."We were not crooks, but we appointed a bunch of dills".

But that problem emerges from the flawed political system itself. People act in self interest, and politics is an avenue to fulfill that self interest. Back the right party, win..and be rewarded...even if you happen to be the most rancid toxic pestilential prawn on the Barby.

An adversarial 2 party system will never permit such economic advance for reasons outlined above.

Once that pilot industry project succeeds..(How can it fail considering our imports???) we can move on to the next one, whatever that might be. Projects like this can be initially funded by public money, then sold to private enterprise when they are a going concern. (Money returns to public hands.)

For each industry or agricultoral sector we succeed in, there is not just the improved balance of payments and eliminated debt...there is the vast improvement in GDP for each sector.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Our Mission-Background.

History is marked with pivotal moments.

BATTLE for ROMEFor the Romans it was the appoinment of Fabius Maximus as temporary dictator in the face of repeated defeats by Hannibal of Carthage. Army after Roman army had been outwitted and slaughtered by Hannibals better tactics. Now he was at the gates of ROME itself. The decision to appoint Fabius saved Rome. He did not confront Hannibal face to face, but embarked on a geurilla war, scortched earth and attrition. Eventually Hannibal had to simply 'go away' because to stay would mean starvation for his army. Rome, was saved.

BATTLE OF TOURS 732In this battle, the rampaging Muslims from Spain sought to take over France. They slashed and burned their way through the Pyranee mountains and into Frankish territory, but were met by a much smaller but well trained and disciplined army of only infantry... led by Charles (The Hammer) Martel.The Muslims were driven away, soundly defeated, and France was saved.

BATTLE of VIENNA 1683 After a long Muslim siege and invasion, their hordes ended up at the gates of Vienna. The last major stronghold of European civilization was set to be swallowed by the ever advancing merciless Islamic juggernaut.over a hundred thousand Muslim soldiers were poised to strike. Jan III Sobieski, with his Polish cavalry came at the last moment.. "here comes the cavalry" and the Muslim Turks were sent packing never to return.....until now, by stealth and immigration and fertility rate.

Now... the time has come for those who can see the past, predict the future and process current events in that light, who can then choose strategies to influence the social order in the interests of all that is decent, pure and enduring. No such mission occurs in an ideological vacuum, it must have a source an underlying ideology. This blog is of the view that new people make good societies, not new systems. Some systems are more viable than others. Plato covers these in his 5 regimes. Rousseau tried his hand at it in his Social Contract, Robispierre tried it with the French Revolution, Marx thought he had the final answer, Hitler tried his final solution, and they all fell apart. If you begin with a flawed idea, you will end with a disfuntional society. The Enlightenment was in reality the endarkenment, opening human minds to so called 'reason'. But even then, Kant's view of what enlightenment is, was just one of around 50 contemporary viewpoints. No matter what else people think, there is only ONE viewpoint or 'law' so to speak which works. "Do for others as you would have them do for you"..it covers everything, except one. That 'one' is the source of motivation to do just that. If humanity is left to itself, the might is right. The one who has the authority for loving your neighbout is none other than He who said "Hear oh Israel".