Sunday, March 02, 2014

328 Ukraïne.

Update: Today, march 5, a conversation was put on youtube between Cathy Ashton and mr. Paet, the Estonian minister for Foreign Affairs. ( 10 minute version) ( RT version 4 min.) Paet: its sure that the SAME snipers killed police and protesters on Maidan. Peaple understand that this was not done by Yanukovich. The new government does not want to investigate it.This is really important news, of course. But as The Saker writes: it will soon be forgotten.I will copy The Sakers blog here, on my blog nr. 329. He has been in intelligence, and describes how these essential proofs of what is the truth, are swept under the carpet. A group of people who investigate Syria have written on their blog: "we couldn't help but notice a very familiar pattern in the recent culmination of unrest in the Ukraine. Our research has led some contributors to believe that part of the reasons for escalation in Syria and other places have been snipers of unknown identity shooting at both protesters and police forces." ( List) ( Talk ) Earlier I wrote about the 'men in Black', which is an earlier version of the tactic: ( blog)

Here are some facts that are leading me in my interpretation of what is happening there.

1. The USA has spent 5.000.000.000 $ in the last 20 years to bring 'democracy' in Ukraïne.

( So said the assistent Secretary of State for Ukraine, Victoria Nuland: Video . Note: Nuland is married to Robert Kagan, who co-founded the PNAC report: how to create the American Empire.)

We know that all wars of the USA are waged under humanitarian flags. For the benefit of the Vietnamese they waged a war there that killed 3 million of them. ( It was very beneficial for the USA war industry. And the huge American Army gave Wall Street all the power it needed.
They killed 30 % of the North Koreans with napalm, 15 years earlier.
They caused the Russians to invade Afghanistan.
They invaded Iraq, using lies for motives, and then caused civil war deliberately.
They supported the destruction of Libya and Syria.

All these wars are in reality never motivated by humanitarian goals. If that were true, then why would they be big friends with countries like Saudi Arabia end Bahrein. Why would they have killed Lumumba, Allende and all the other leaders?

No, their wars have one or more of these goals:
1- Make America stronger.
2- Make America's adversaries weaker.
3- Have the US tax-payer for creating a real strong US army, which gives Wall Street more clout.
4- Make Israel's adversaries weaker.

2. Putin is a strong leader who will not give Russia to the USA/Wall Street, like Yeltsin did. Putin wants to build a group of several countries to form a block that will resist the USA.(*) Ukraine must be part of this block. Now its called the 'customs union', but I think even China might join this group in the future, as they are also attacked by the USA.
(*) Ghadaffi tried to do the same among African countries, and got killed for it.

3. So, if America can make the Ukraïne turn away from Russia, that will be a strategic blow dealt to a (potential) ennemy.

4. Creating a revolution in another country is what the USA is specialised in.

Gene Sharp wrote a manual about it.( Video) Otpor is one of the groups that is effectuating it. ( Dutch video, English video) But also lots and lots of NGO's are working on it, as Hillary Clinton told herself so clearly: Video.
The whole 'action' is under the banner of 'ending a bad regime', but very often the regime is the best that one can have, given the circumstances. And àlways, after the 'humanitarian revolution', the country is devastated and the people are in much worse circumstances. But: the USA and often Israel are in a better position.
One time they use 'Communism' as a reason to destroy a country ( Vietnam). Then it is 'dictatorship' ( Panama). Or hiding a terrorist ( Afghanistan) . Then it is 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' ( Iraq). Next time it is supposed plans to bomb his own population ( Ghadaffi) . Or the effort to stop a coup by religious fanatics ( Assad). Or the possible development of a nuclear bomb ( Iran).

Our Humanitarian Friends have bombed 33 countries since WW2. ( bombs)
Other countries and International Law was often against these interventions. (Scheme)

But how are we to know?
They controle our Media. They decide what we know about the world.

5. How do they do it? (1)
I think by brainwashing and selection. Most people are probably genuine in their opinions: they really believe that America is a democracy, and that JFK was killed by a Magic Bullit, and that buildings fall down in free fall after office fires ( WTC7), and that Saddam had WMD's and that Ghadaffi would have thrown bombs on his own people etc. etc.
But there must be a group of people who create this brainwashing. How is that possible? I find that a difficult question. Many of these people are jewish. And they have brainwashing in their culture. Their history is made up of pogroms. But never they will learn what caused these pogroms. Hate and revenge is what drives them. ( Lysson)
Rabbinical Judaïsm is like an eternal war, declared by the jews on the Christians. Non-religious jews do use their fellow jews as a tool to conquer the world. To divide their opponents. That is in a few words what I think is happening.

6. How do they do it? (2)
Every country has people who hate the government. They send in do-gooders who appeal to these disgruntled groups. An already divided country is easy: tell the Sunni's that they ought to rule their country. Tell the West-Ukraïnians that Europe wants to help them, if they revolt.
Have a peacefull demonstration, and combine this with big support of Western Media. Make the demonstration last longer and longer. ( In Kiev it was the police that was peacefull, and the demonstraters that were violent. That is how afraid Yanukovich was of being labeled as a tyrant.)
And finally: send in the snipers. Let them shoot people on boths sides.
In Sarajewo the snipers killed muslims and serbs.
In Benghazi there were snipers too probably.
In Daraa ( Syria) the snipers killed policemen ànd peacefull demonstraters.
In Kiev the snipers killed policemen ànd demonstraters, the day after a peace-agreement was made!

Killing people on both sides makes everybody hate the opponent.
That is the goal you want to reach: that people see their friends die.
They will not ask what has really happened.
They will get in a state of blind anger, willing to torture and kill every opponent.
Solders who fought in wars have often described this.

-----------------

That is the situation we have now in Kiev.
Yanukovich has left.
Of course he was a corrupt oligarch, but all his competitors were also corrupt oligarchs. From 2005 to 2010 the Ukraïne was led by a pro-USA president, Yushchenko, and he was not any better.
Ukraïnians lived in poverty, but were not killed or harrased by thugs.

Now the thugs have taken over. ('Interahamwe') ( Muzychka ) ( police )
Now Ukraïnians live in poverty ànd can be killed by criminals.

Ukraïnians may hope for a better standard of living, and may expect this to come from collaboration with The West. I could understand that. But Europe is broke, and the USA is only interested in frustrating Putin.
Where did the USA ever make a population happy?
Not even in the USA people have the comfort that Ghadaffi's people had under Ghadaffi.

Those Ukraïnians who expect a better life from cooperating with The West are deluded.
The thugs who simply want to get away from Russia because they hate Russia, well, in a way I can understand them: they remember the holomodor.
They are also anti-semitic, which can also be understood if you know what happened in the Ukraine in the last 500 years. ( Lysson)
But is this hatred of these thugs a sound reason for taking Ukraïne away from Russia?
No, because it will lead to more blood-shed.

I think it would be best if the Ukraïne would stay in the Russian sphere of influence.

An legitimately-elected (said by all international monitors) Ukrainian
President, Viktor Yanukovich, has been driven from office, forced to flee as a
war criminal after more than three months of violent protest and terrorist
killings by so-called opposition.

His “crime” according to protest leaders was that he rejected an EU offer of a
vaguely-defined associate EU membership that offered little to Ukraine in favor
of a concrete deal with Russia that gave immediate €15 billion debt relief and
a huge reduction in Russian gas import prices. Washington at that point went
into high gear and the result today is catastrophe.

A secretive neo-nazi military organization reported linked to NATO played a
decisive role in targeted sniper attacks and violence that led to the collapse
of the elected government.

But the West is not finished with destroying Ukraine. Now comes the IMF with
severe conditionalities as prerequisite to any Western financial help.

After the famous leaked phone call of US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria
Nuland (photo, left) with the US Ambassador in Kiev, where she discussed the
details of who she wanted in a new coalition government in Kiev, and where she
rejected the EU solutions with her “Fuck the EU” comment,[1] the EU went it
alone. Germany’s Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier proposed that he and
his French counterpart, Laurent Fabius, fly to Kiev and try to reach a
resolution of the violence before escalation. Polish Foreign Minister, Radoslaw
Sikorski was asked to join. The talks in Kiev included the EU delegation,
Yanukovich, the three opposition leaders and a Russian representative. The USA
was not invited.[2]

The EU intervention without Washington was extraordinary and reveals the
deeping division between the two in recent months. In effect it was the EU
saying to the US State Department, “F*** the US,” we will end this ourselves.

After hard talks, all major parties including the majority of protesters,
agreed to new presidential elections in December, return to the 2004
Constitution and release of Julia Tymoshenko from prison. The compromise
appeared to end the months long chaos and give a way out for all major players.

The diplomatic compromise lasted less than twelve hours. Then all hell broke
loose.

Snipers began shooting into the crowd on February 22 in Maidan or Independence
Square. Panic ensued and riot police retreated in panic according to
eyewitnesses. The opposition leader Vitali Klitschko withdrew from the deal, no
reason given. Yanukovich fled Kiev.[3]

The question unanswered until now is who deployed the snipers? According to
veteran US intelligence sources, the snipers came from an ultra-right-wing
military organization known as Ukrainian National Assembly – Ukrainian People’s
Self-Defense (UNA-UNSO).

The leader of UNA-UNSO, Andriy Shkil, ten years ago became an adviser to Julia
Tymoshenko. UNA-UNSO, during the US-instigated 2003-2004 “Orange Revolution”,
backed pro-NATO candidate Viktor Yushchenko against his pro-Russian opponent,
Yanukovich. UNA-UNSO members provided security for the supporters of Yushchenko
and Julia Tymoshenko on Independence Square in Kiev in 2003-4.[4]

UNA-UNSO is also reported to have close ties to the German National Democratic
Party (NDP). [5]

Ever since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 the crack-para-military
UNA-UNSO members have been behind every revolt against Russian influence. The
one connecting thread in their violent campaigns is always anti-Russia. The
organization, according to veteran US intelligence sources, is part of a secret
NATO “GLADIO” organization, and not a Ukraine nationalist group as portrayed in
western media. [6]

According to these sources, UNA-UNSO have been involved (confirmed officially)
in the Lithuanian events in the Winter of 1991, the Soviet Coup d’etat in
Summer 1991, the war for the Pridnister Republic 1992, the anti-Moscow Abkhazia
War 1993, the Chechen War, the US-organized Kosovo Campaign Against the Serbs,
and the August 8 2008 war in Georgia. According to these reports, UNA-UNSO
para-military have been involved in every NATO dirty war in the post-cold war
period, always fighting on behalf of NATO. “These people are the dangerous
mercenaries used all over the world to fight NATO’s dirty war, and to frame
Russia because this group pretends to be Russian special forces. THESE ARE THE
BAD GUYS, forget about the window dressing nationalists, these are the men
behind the sniper rifles,” these sources insist. [7]

If true that UNA-UNSO is not “Ukrainian” opposition, but rather a highly secret
NATO force using Ukraine as base, it would suggest that the EU peace compromise
with the moderates was likely sabotaged by the one major player excluded from
the Kiev 21 February diplomatic talks—Victoria Nuland’s State Department.[8]
Both Nuland and right-wing Republican US Senator John McCain have had contact
with the leader of the Ukrainian opposition Svoboda Party, whose leader is
openly anti-semitic and defends the deeds of a World War II Ukrainian
SS-Galicia Division head.[9] The party was registered in 1995, initially
calling itself the “Social National Party of Ukraine” and using a swastika
style logo. Svoboda is the electoral front for neo-nazi organizations in Ukraine
such as UNA-UNSO.[10]

One further indication that Nuland’s hand is shaping latest Ukraine events is
the fact that the new Ukrainian Parliament is expected to nominate Nuland’s
choice, Arseny Yatsenyuk, from Tymoshenko’s party, to be interim head of the
new Cabinet.

Whatever the final truth, clear is that Washington has prepared a new economic
rape of Ukraine using its control over the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

IMF plunder of Ukraine Crown Jewels

Now that the “opposition” has driven a duly-elected president into exile
somewhere unknown, and dissolved the national riot police, Berkut, Washington
has demanded that Ukraine submit to onerous IMF conditionalities.

In negotiations last October, the IMF demanded that Ukraine double prices for gas
and electricity to industry and homes, that they lift a ban on private sale of
Ukraine’s rich agriculture lands, make a major overhaul of their economic
holdings, devalue the currency, slash state funds for school children and the
elderly to “balance the budget.” In return Ukraine would get a paltry $4
billion.

Before the ouster of the Moscow-leaning Yanukovich government last week, Moscow
was prepared to buy some $15 billion of Ukraine debt and to slash its gas
prices by fully one-third. Now, understandably, Russia is unlikely to give that
support. The economic cooperation between Ukraine and Moscow was something
Washington was determined to sabotage at all costs.

This drama is far from over. The stakes involve the very future of Russia, the
EU-Russian relations, and the global power of Washington, or at least that
faction in Washington that sees further wars as the prime instrument of policy.

Writer F. William Engdahl is a geopolitical analyst and the author of “Full
Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order”.

About Me

'Mission statement'.
I am convinced that jewish individuals and groups have an enormous influence on the world. The MSM are, for almost all people, the only source of information, and these are largely controlled by jewish people.
So there is a huge under-reporting on jewish influence in the world.
I see it as my mission to try to close this gap. To quote Henry Ford: "Corral the 50 wealthiest jews and there will be no wars." `(Thomas Friedman wrote the same in Haaretz, about the war against Iraq! See yellow marked area, blog 573)
If that is true, my mission must be very beneficial to humanity.