Sunday, July 30, 2017

Clownish
behavior by liberal mongers to implicate the President in collusion with the
Russians is nothing less than a travesty in the making. More than a year has
gone by since the first whispers of foreign involvement in the American
election process surfaced. Falling all over each other to see who can catch a
Russian ghost first the left are diverting attention from their treasonous behavior.
From Debbie Wasserman Schultz engaging Pakistani operatives to manage DNC
computers to Hillary’s wheeling and dealing for funds to enhance the Clinton
Foundation from foreign entities. As the Democrats search for answers to unanswerable
questions the liberal slime moves freely amongst us with impunity or so they
think. Prosecution of individuals selling out America for a buck or two should
be a top priority for the judicial system. So far it hasn’t been. Donald Trump
is correct when he stated that his Attorney General has veered too far from
Hillary-Gate. Suspending his role in the Russian probe was no less a surprise
to the President. Time has come to
replace the Sessions and put America’s house in order.

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Medical
Boards have gone beyond policing of physicians to unconscionable intrusion into
medical practice. Complexity of administrative law governing physician
licensing and subsequent maintenance of licensure requires a knowledge beyond
the ken of most physicians. Medical Boards employ their own attorneys and or
utilize those from the Attorney General’s Office in the state from which
medical licenses are derived. Without knowing the intricacy of medical board
regulatory function a physician has no chance of obtaining an impartial
hearing. Fair and balanced should not be expected from adversarial government
entities. Medical Boards across the country have garnered more power as
physicians blindly kowtowed to each and every edict they generated. Medical
Societies, with few exceptions, no longer protect the flock that pay their way.
Social and economic impact from a negative Board maneuvers against a physician can
be devastating. Therefore the proper push back is a moral imperative.

As a former
practicing physician I have seen the lengths a state board will go to prove a
lie against you is true. Standards of Care may not be as standard as those
empowered by us want you to believe. Through the use of hired guns, also called
medical vigilantes, medical boards can make a case where none exists. Administrative
courts, where your supposed impartial hearing is to take place, are nothing
more than biased forums to cement the outcome the Medical Board is seeking. In
the event a hearing goes your way most Boards have the right to flip the
positive court outcome against you. The latter statement is factually true as
this author has experienced. Medical Boards have moved far afield from their
original intent. These administrative entities are self-serving meaning
sanctioning is their reason for existence. By sanctioning as many physicians as
possible the public perception is they are doing a fine job. Boards have
forgotten physicians have rights too. Yet these entities cherry pick
regulations to effectuate the preconceived outcome they want. Do not go before
a Board or a Court without “appropriate” counsel. The end result could be
devastating to your career.

Friday, July 7, 2017

Until recently I thought there was a
specter of hope in the entitlement community where they would see the
proverbial writing on the wall. Freebies may be coming to an end, as they know
them. The welfare set has become too emboldened recently as though society owes
them for past grievances. Collectively we owe them nothing. Through protest,
violence, misrepresentation of facts and finally murder their words and deeds
speak for themselves. In certain quarters the latter elements are actually
forgiven and or given a pass.

College and
universities have become the newest battleground to spew hatred from those who
condemn work and scholarship. Diminished standards placed these radicals in
institutions which formerly would have rejected them. Coincident with their
intolerance to other subsets of civil society a truly emboldened crowd has
manifest an unheard of anger towards those who keep us safe. Calling for the
annihilation of police steps over any line that can be drawn. Time has come to
resurrect policies that have a measured approach in silencing this hideous
rhetoric. What should our approach be to these malevolent attitudes and
actions? Mark Davis