As few as there are gay conservatives. There ARE a handful; some right here on HA.

But when you’re part of a movement that is not only anathema to conservative belief but actively despises conservatives and may be working to sue/bully them in to compliance…it’s a pretty hard circle to square.

Getting an abortion in NY is already as easy as buying a pack of cigarettes

Are you sure you want to use that analogy? It’s probably harder to buy cigs these days.

]]>By: teachermanhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/21/cuomo-abortion-bill-outrageous-says-democrats-for-life/comment-page-3/#comment-6661561
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:27:32 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=240060#comment-6661561How totally unnecessary. Getting an abortion in NY is already as easy as buying a pack of cigarettes. Any political capital Cuomo earned by not raising taxes in NY has just been lost. Goodbye Presidential ambitions. Andrew can now join The Fat Man in the “I coulda been a contender” competition.
]]>By: itsspideymanhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/21/cuomo-abortion-bill-outrageous-says-democrats-for-life/comment-page-3/#comment-6661132
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:30:41 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=240060#comment-6661132

lol. Like they did in 2010 right? You binary narrow-minded thinking conservatives will never learn will you? STAY THE HECK OUT OF WOMEN’S VAGINA. Anyway what do i care? Makes winning elections much easier for my side.

HotAirLib on January 21, 2013 at 9:22 AM

Since the election your posts have been devoid of thought or sense. Your comments confirm you are not a thought, but an appetite.

]]>By: LibraryGryffonhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/21/cuomo-abortion-bill-outrageous-says-democrats-for-life/comment-page-3/#comment-6660855
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:33:46 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=240060#comment-6660855Interesting how liberals think a girl should have the inalienable right to kill her child without parental input, even if she is only 12 or 13 herself, but God forbid a 20 year old soldier wants to have a beer…

Also, if abortion is to become a fundamental right, unconstrained by the age of the person exercising it, then there are plenty of other “rights” which parents currently can exert over their children, which will go by the wayside.

Which of course is probably part of their agenda, along with that horrid UN treaty on children’s rights.

Since the Declaration of Independence reminds us that we only get our rights from Nature’s God, I guess one could reasonably assume Obama just threw out all his rights, by officially rejecting that God?

Don L on January 22, 2013 at 4:44 AM

You are absolutely correct.

One of the reasons liberals reject divine rights is that they want to be the ones deciding who has what rights.

BTW, Obama omitted “under God” when he said the Pledge of Allegiance today. Hmmm So did Mrs. Evers. Hmmm.

Since the Declaration of Independence reminds us that we only get our rights from Nature’s God, I guess one could reasonably assume Obama just threw out all his rights, by officially rejecting that God?
Gosh, he has as much protection to exercise his rights now as an unborn.

While the bill contains limited conscience protection, that protection is ambiguous and inadequate and is extended only to individual health providers who do not wish to “provide” abortions (protection that is already guaranteed by Civil Rights law.) What is not provided in the bill are protections for institutional providers, such as religious hospitals and other agencies that do not wish to be involved with abortion. The bill declares that “the state shall not discriminate” against the exercise of the fundamental right to abortion in the “provision of benefits, facilities, services or information.” In other words, it would permit state regulators, such as the State Health Department or State Insurance Department, to require support for abortion from any agency or institution licensed or funded by the state.

The bill could be used to undermine the state’s maternity programs.

In a similar way, these beneficial programs, which are working well to reduce infant mortality, could be ruled “discriminatory” for favoring childbirth over abortion, and be denied state benefits if this bill were to become law…”

There first response is to alert the congregations. Cuomo cannot stop this in the churches.

“The state Catholic Conference condemned the bill in a memo, saying, “It goes well beyond Roe.”

“This bill says that abortion is fundamental and thus untouchable – no regulations on abortion, ever. No parental notification for minors’ abortions, no limits on taxpayer funding of abortion, no limits on late-term abortions, no informed consent for pregnant women seeking abortion,” it stated. “None of the commonsense regulations enacted by the vast majority of states and supported by large majorities of the public would be allowed in New York.”

The Conference presented a point-by-point deconstruction of the legislation…”

The Bishops will order letters like this to be read at every mass. They will order the instruction to be passed along repeatedly and discussed as to action.

Aint’ nothin the liberals can do about it because this is church doctrine and they will preach it till they are blue in the face…

Nobody expected French citizens to rally across France to defend the justice of traditional marriage for children…

Cuomo will pay a steep price as he is painted the new face of infanticide in the pulpits.

lol. Like they did in 2010 right? You binary narrow-minded thinking conservatives will never learn will you? STAY THE HECK OUT OF WOMEN’S VAGINA. Anyway what do i care? Makes winning elections much easier for my side.

HotAirLib on January 21, 2013 at 9:22 AM

A full term baby being killed is worth an lol because it helps you win elections? It takes every ounce of my being to not wish some painful harm befall you monsters like you.

I don’t see it as a harm at all. I see it as part of humanity learning to live in harmony with the planet we live on.

thuja on January 21, 2013 at 4:06 PM

What Cuomo is stating, is that in his state, a mother may terminate her child as late as her due date. If you’re really okay with this, I have to tell you that the planet would indeed be better off without you.

America is slowly dying. And if this becomes the popular mentality, let it slip away because it won’t deserve to go on.

.
A clinical, institutionalized environment is more appealing than a back-alley, to a self-serving woman.

Plus, if it’s done in a medical facility, they can collect dead babies (possibly even live premies) in a controlled environment for some kind of horrible experiments, that I suspect are going on.

Hows that for paranoia?

]]>By: wakey74http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/21/cuomo-abortion-bill-outrageous-says-democrats-for-life/comment-page-3/#comment-6659194
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:17:16 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=240060#comment-6659194I thought the point of roe v wade was so that no one had to have back alley abortions any more and they would be done by doctors. Now this bill will allow non doctors to perform them so what is the point then of roe v wade
]]>By: blammmhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/21/cuomo-abortion-bill-outrageous-says-democrats-for-life/comment-page-2/#comment-6659148
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:01:34 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=240060#comment-6659148

pannw on January 21, 2013 at 1:46 PM

Oh, please! Save the sanctimonious BS about self-excommunication. Yes, Cuomo and his ilk have achieved just that under Catholic doctrine. But the point is that the Church needs to distance itself from these fools. Their continued nominal membership in the Church is what gives them credibility on these issues. They use their “Catholic faith” to dissuade people from probing the morality of abortion because they act as role models for Catholics who might be persuaded by their rhetoric. Catholics justify their positions by seeing other Catholics openly support these positions. They love slapping that little description on their resume so that Catholicism is redefined by politicians with an agenda opposite to the teachings that they claim to profess. The Church is being used by them plain and simple.

from Governor Andrew Cuomo in what is already arguably the abortion capital of the nation, which would eliminate parental notification requirements and allow non-doctors to perform abortions

Of course. Perhaps, good dimocrat that he is, he has some pedo friends to protect. Don’t forget, it was his party that protected pedophiles with its ‘hate crimes’ legislation and then gave the bstrds Viagra with their ‘healthcare bill’. Drunk Max Baucus wouldn’t remove the language, remember? And now, their mind-molesting friends in academia are trying to normalize sex with children.

we all know that the dims hate kids; that’s why they support abortion.
Apparently, they also like pedophiles.

]]>By: MN Jhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/21/cuomo-abortion-bill-outrageous-says-democrats-for-life/comment-page-2/#comment-6658939
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:50:51 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=240060#comment-6658939We have lost our core – I’m no religious, righteous individual but this is just appalling as is the apparent lack of backbone by the Catholic Church. Whether or not you agree w/ abortion, just look at the powerful Catholics with whom O has surrounded himself: Pelosi, Sibelius, Cuomo, Kerry, and we expect to survive as a “shining light on a hill?” No way. And the innocents that will go down –

I’d hoped Cardinal Dolan was stronger – turning the other cheek may work in some instances but we are so quickly sliding to anarchy (or near anarchy) that perhaps it’s time to STAND UP and say “NO!”

We go, there’s no place left.

BTW, Obama omitted “under God” when he said the Pledge of Allegiance today. Hmmm So did Mrs. Evers. Hmmm.

Way sad. Seems to me that being a pro-life Dem is now an oxy-moron. The Democrat party left the “pro-life” movement a long time ago. One-issue voting is not what I’m saying here but life???? How can one have liberty and pursue happiness when one has no life?

It would permit unlimited late term abortion on demand – right up to the ninth month.

Why stop there? It’s just a mass of cells, right? So the woman should have the right to kill that mass of cells right up to the point when that mass of cells can legally cast a vote for a Democrat. After that point, killing it would just be wrong.

AZCoyote on January 21, 2013 at 8:27 PM

How is shooting a 6 year old at Sandy Hook different than killing a 9 month fetus that is viable outside the womb? Certain persons have already come out in favor of infanticide. Actually,to continue the same logic, maybe murder isn’t really murder. People are just masses of cells. If it’s for the good of the state, why not?