Obama administration embraces major new cut in nuclear weapons

Source: Miami Herald

Senior Obama administration officials have agreed that the number of nuclear warheads the U.S. military deploys could be cut by at least a third without harming national security, according to those involved in the deliberations.

Such a reduction would open the door to billions of dollars in military savings, which might ease the federal budget deficit. It also would improve prospects for a new arms deal with Russia before President Barack Obama leaves office, those involved said, but it’s likely to draw fire from conservatives, if previous debate on the issue is any guide.

The results of the internal review haven’t been announced, but they’re reflected in a proposed classified directive prepared for Obama’s signature that details how U.S. nuclear weapons should be targeted against potential foes, according to four people with direct knowledge of the document’s content. The sources, who spoke only on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to talk to a reporter about the review, described the president as fully on board, but said he hasn’t signed the document.

The document directs the first detailed Pentagon revisions in U.S. targeting since 2009, when the military’s nuclear war planners last took account for the substantial shrinkage – roughly by half from 2000 to 2008 – in the number of nuclear weapons in the American arsenal. It makes clear that an even smaller nuclear force can still meet all defense requirements.

5. I am more in favor of sealing up silos than removing our SSBN deterrent

MAD appears to have worked through the Cold War, and the fact that we have a fundamentally untraceable and unreachable deterrent somewhere out there is more of a protection than hardened but reachable nukes. The fact that a can of sunshine is possibly 30 minutes from your capital will keep "sane" belligerents from glassing a US city or American base.
As for other actors? We need to develop a practical and effective ABM system, and once that umbrella is in place, then we consider mothballing our nuclear deterrent.

Look people, if India & Pakistan nuke each other, odds are it would be worse than the Permian extinction.

If you have kids or care about life on earth (I care about all, but humans are in last place) than you ought to be campaigning against nukes. (i worry who will take care of the dogs & puppies?)

I would rather have all the molecules in my body blown to atoms than live through a nuke war & die slowly from starvation & radiation.

You know last summer they discovered a warp drive that could get 4.3 light years in two weeks. I have finally decided the human race has no place screwing up the galaxy as bad as we are doing here at home.