This article examines how meaning is made of White racial identity by comparing two White racial projects assumed antithetical—White nationalists and White antiracists. While clear differences abound, they make meaning of Whiteness and racial “others” in surprisingly similar ways. Racial identity formation is structured by understandings of Whiteness as dull, empty, lacking, and incomplete (“White debt”) coupled with a search to alleviate those feelings through the appropriation of objects, discourses, and people coded as non-White (“Color capital”). Drawing from in-depth semi-structured interviews, fourteen months of ethnographic observations, and content analysis, this article demonstrates how the prevailing meanings of Whiteness, not their antithetical political projects or material resources, enable racial identity management. By examining seemingly antithetical White formations, the article illuminates not only striking differences but how divergent White actors similarly negotiate the dominant expectations of Whiteness.

McIntosh, Peggy (1988). White Privilege and Male Privilege: A Personal Account of Coming to See Correspondence Through Work in Women's Studies. Working Paper 189, Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, Wellesley College.

Pratt, Richard H. ([1892] 1973). Official Report of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of Charities and Correction: The Advantages of Mingling Indians with Whites. In Americanizing the American Indians: Writings by the “Friends of the Indian” 1880–1900, pp. 260–271. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.