Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages.

To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login.

As ye sow, so shall ye reap, or in modern parlance, “What goes around, comes around.”

Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) finds itself on the receiving end of absurdity, having to defend itself from a lawsuit over its use of the word “timeline” from a company of the same name that launched in 2009 a service allowing users to track historical events and share knowledge and experiences from their personal lives. Timeline, of course, was a new feature unveiled late last year that tracked an individual’s activity on the site in chronological order.

Patently absurd
On the surface you might feel the social networking site shouldn’t be liable for such a commonly used word — and that was essentially its defense — but when you realize that it has previously trademarked or tried to trademark everyday words like “like,” “poke,” “wall,” “face,” and even “book,” you get the sense it’s getting a taste of karma.

Timelines, the company taking on Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB), has just 1,200 registered users compared to the 1 billion the social network boasts, but size is no matter when it comes to who has rights to what, and in a ruling handed down on April 1, a judge overseeing the lawsuit said the upstart can move forward.

The legal action was filed just before Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) started the new feature, and it was pointed out that finding Timeline’s Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) page became difficult after it launched because the social network started redirecting searches for the term to its own service. The judge acknowledged there are generic uses of the word, but also pointed out that when the U.S. patent office granted Timelines its trademark, it was well aware of them but found it was using the word in a non-generic manner.

Wall of worry
Of course, all this doesn’t mean Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) won’t prevail when the case goes before a jury, but even the social network’s own survey it submitted to the court suggests it won’t be a slam dunk. Among people 14 and older, more than two-thirds thought “timeline” was generic, while 24% thought it referred to a brand name. It underscores the need for patent reform in this country. Like Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN)‘s one-click checkout patent and MercExchange’s wrangling $35 million out of eBay Inc (NASDAQ:EBAY) for its “Buy It Now” feature, such obvious grants by the patent office need to be seriously reconsidered.

Yet I’m sure there’s no irony that upon visiting Timelines’ home page you find a prominently displayed a link calling for you to find it on Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB). Only if you can find it, though.