CPAC’s Hollow Disavowal of the White Nationalists in Its Midst

CPAC’s Hollow Disavowal of the White Nationalists in Its Midst

Looking in the mirror would be much more productive.

February 24, 2017

Richard Spencer takes questions from reporters before being removed from the Conservative Political Action Conference on February 23, 2017 in National Harbor, Maryland. (Sipa US via AP Images)

Ready to fight back?

Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions every Tuesday.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Support Progressive Journalism

The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.

Fight Back!

Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can each week.

Travel With The Nation

Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.

Sign up for our Wine Club today.

Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?

Dan Schneider had a message for the thousands of conservative activists gathered on Thursday in the Potomac Ballroom at the Gaylord Convention Center, in an anodyne suburb of Washington, DC. “We’ve been slapped in the face,” he told the attendees of the Conservative Political Action Conference. “There is a sinister organization that is trying to worm its way into our ranks.”

This year’s CPAC has shown the conservative movement in the United States is facing a crisis of its own making, as the white supremacists it has nourished since its inception are emerging from the shadows and demanding a seat at the table. But that wasn’t what Schneider said. Rather than acknowledge and take responsibility for the extremists their movement has birthed, conservatives are feigning ignorance and blaming a familiar boogeyman for their problems, all while continuing to celebrate the fringe positions they claim to decry.

Schneider, the executive director of the American Conservative Union, the organization behind CPAC, was delivering a speech titled: “The Alt-Right Ain’t Right At All.” Initially, it seemed he was going to denounce the collection of neo-Nazis and white nationalists who have adopted the euphemism “alt-right” to rebrand their bigotries as new and edgy. Instead, he offered an implausible explanation for their rise that left the room largely silent—either due to confusion or lack of interest. The alt-right wasn’t the inevitable outgrowth of decades of right-wing politicians stoking racist animosity through coded language, he argued, but rather a mysterious leftist false-flag operation.

“Just a few years ago, this left-wing, fascist group hijacked the very term ‘alt-right,’” he said. “They are not part of us. They stole the term specifically to confuse us.” He added, for emphasis: “They are nothing but garden-variety, left-wing fascists.” Schneider specifically referenced an incident from November during which prominent white-supremacist Richard Spencer—famous online for getting punched in the face—gave a Nazi salute to then–President-elect Donald Trump. To claim Spencer is a leftist, rather than the culmination of decades of movement conservatism, takes staggering levels of delusion, paranoia, and self-pity. Ignorance about the alt-right is dangerous, as hate crimes against Muslims and Jews continue to rise—including on Wednesday when a white man in Kansas shot two men he believed to be from the Middle East, killing one of them, and injuring a bystander who attempted to intervene.

Outside the ballroom, Spencer was surrounded by members of the media desperate for a quote. After about 45 minutes, he was ejected from the premises, despite having purchased a ticket. “His views are repugnant and have absolutely nothing to do with conservatism or what we do here,” said CPAC spokesman Ian Walters, according to NPR.

4

5

Schneider’s speech, and Spencer’s ejection, came days after “fellow traveller” of the alt-right, Milo Yiannopoulos, was disinvited from the conference after comments he made condoning pedophilia were widely circulated. Despite years of making money pedaling transphobia, racism, and misogyny, Yiannopoulos also lost a lucrative book deal from Simon & Schuster as a result of the uproar. That Yiannopoulos was invited under the pretense of defending free speech, regardless of content, made CPAC’s decision all the more obviously hypocritical.

CPAC’s nominal gestures toward disavowing white-nationalist fascism rang hollow. For one, the conservative movement from William Buckley and Barry Goldwater, through Ronald Reagan and Lee Atwater, and now to Trump, has always been about maintaining and reproducing a society structured around white, patriarchal dominance. The new, more explicit manifestation of their project is hateful to them, so they want to banish it and retain the disingenuous, comfortable pose of colorblind, principled conservatism.

More immediately, though, the very day conservatives patted themselves on the back for ousting the nearly universally reviled Spencer from the conference, CPAC hosted a joint appearance between White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. Prior to his top role in Trump’s campaign, Bannon headed Breitbart, a far right-wing site that employed Yiannopoulos until his recent comments. While at the helm at Breitbart, which he once referred to as the “platform of the alt-right,” Bannon did more than any other individual to provide a platform for the movement Schneider claims is in fact an outside interloper. Beyond that, deputy assistant to the president Sebastian Gorka, a crowd favorite, has worked “with openly racist and anti-Semitic groups and public figures,” according to a new investigation from Forward.

In his remarks at CPAC, Bannon continued to send barely coded signals to the fringe, white-nationalist elements of the right both in the United States and in Europe—where Breitbart is making a major push to expand. “They’re corporatist, globalist media. They’re adamantly opposed to an economic-nationalist agenda like Donald Trump has,” Bannon said. Minutes later, he laid out what he believed united the attendees at CPAC. “The center core of what we believe: We’re a nation with an economy, not an economy just in some global marketplace with open borders, but we are a nation with a culture and a reason for being.”

In another context, these comments might seem unremarkable. But given the day’s prior events, and Bannon’s proximity to Yiannopoulos—and Spencer’s ethereal, quasi-movement, if not Spencer himself—they take on a far more sinister quality.

“Economic nationalism could mean investing in infrastructure, protecting consumers from corporate predation and unfair trade deals, while creating good working-class jobs here in the United States. It could also mean scapegoating Muslims and immigrants while letting rich elites get away with murder,” said Mike Konczal, a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, a progressive think tank. “Everything so far shows Bannon and Trump mean the second version.”

Lee Drutman, senior fellow in the political-reform program at New America, echoed Konczal’s concerns. “What we’ve seen both from these remarks, and the way Trump has run his administration so far, is that Trump has no interest in being the president for all Americans,” said Drutman. “He and Bannon have a vision of what America is, and who it should be for, and that vision is very white and very Christian. I wouldn’t say they are ‘vulnerable’ to right-wing activists, or that Spencer et al. are influencing the administration. Trump and his team are the white nationalist activists.”

Trump himself addressed the packed hall on Friday, and began by saying he would have come to CPAC the previous year, but worried he would be “too controversial.” He then mimicked Bannon’s comments from the day before, saying the “core conviction of our movement: We are a nation that put and will put its own citizens first.” He repeated language he used to launch his campaign, blaming immigrants for “drugs or murder,” and vowed to find “criminal aliens” and begin “throwing them the hell out of our country.” He then referenced European countries he believes are overrun by Muslim immigrants. “Take a look at what’s happening in Sweden. Take a look at what’s happening in Germany,” he said. “Take a look at what’s happening to our world.”

It’s not difficult to figure out what he means by “our world,” not withstanding his passing comment that “no matter our color,” we all bleed “the same red blood of great, great patriots.” By Trump’s own acknowledgement, rhetoric decried even by most Republicans as “too controversial” only a year and a half ago is now mainstream conservatism.

And if Schneider is so concerned about fascists, he ought to pay more attention to the nascent administration. Amid his project to advance white nationalism, Trump is undermining institutions designed to check the executive branch.

Trump kicked off his speech to CPAC by reiterating his claim that the “fake” media is an “enemy of the American people.” His administration has also waged repeated war on the federal judiciary. “As Trump’s strategist, Bannon appears both to open up and to navigate this ambiguous space between the radical right and open fascism,” Alexander Reid Ross told The Nation. He is the author of the recently published Against the Fascist Creep, an academic study of how fascism can migrate from radical-right parties into the mainstream, and how fascists can take hold of a political party longing for a lost, imagined golden era.

“Glancing at top Trump picks from [Trump adviser Kris] Kobach to [Attorney General Jeff] Sessions to [Senior Adviser Jared] Kushner, we see an executive with strong affiliations to white nationalist groups and a resentment of judiciary checks to its power. These are warning signs that, if Trump’s policies are not opposed vigorously today on every level, his administration could open the door for even more authoritarian policies in the future, emboldening and perhaps including fascists in that process.”

Ready to Fight Back? Sign Up For Take Action Now

Among CPAC attendees who spoke to The Nation, there seemed to be a desire to identify Spencer as a toxic figure, but to limit their critique to him personally. Laura Lightstone, a student at the University of New Haven, said his presence would be used to discredit the entire conference. “He doesn’t represent anyone here. He’s a scumbag. He’s a racist. He’s an anti-Semite. He’s all over Twitter hating Jews. As a Jew myself, it pisses me off,” Lightstone said. “None of us wanted him here. He’s surrounded by the liberal media, and they’re giving him a platform. You’re gonna use him against us. He has nothing to do with our movement.”

Lightstone was much more enthusiastic about the original Yiannopoulos invite, calling it “great,” and said he was not a racist because he has dated black men. She said she was unfamiliar with his recent comments, and did not defend them.

Two students from the University of Dayton, Thomas Ferrell and John Michael Gomez, generally took the same position as Lightstone. Gomez described himself as a “big fan” of Yiannopoulos. “I make a distinction between Milo and Spencer. Spencer is a white supremacist,” said Gomez. Ferrell added: “Spencer is disgusting.”

To be sure, Yiannopoulos is also disgusting, and has been for years. That conservatives are ready to rail against Spencer and defend Yiannopoulos up to—if not including—his latest remarks, is further evidence that Schneider’s accusation that the left is to blame for the rise of explicit white supremacy in the conservative movement is pure fantasy.

Cas Mudde, associate professor at the University of Georgia, joked on Twitter that he is a former scholar of fringe politics and now studies mainstream politics. For Mudde, the distinctions Schneider tried to draw were meaningless. “The CPAC conference is one big bait-and-switch,” Mudde tells The Nation. “They make a big deal of ostracizing the most racist so-called “alt-right” people, like Richard Spencer, while at the same time having Steve Bannon prominently advocating an ‘alt-right light’ agenda.”

John KnefelTwitterJohn Knefel is an independent journalist covering national security and civil liberties. He is also the co-host of Radio Dispatch, a daily political podcast.

Gawd...this is tiring and tiresome. I only made it through the headline and a paragraph and a half before I began to say to self, "Self, let's see how the perfidious failure to sufficiently condemn the actions of others plays out this time:

Cool, "anodyne", I'll bet this dude was educated by the Jesuits. (looks at name of author). Maybe not, do you pronounce the "K"?

Dude named Spencer strikes me as irretrievably a douchehammer.

It sounds like he is a fascist, much in the same way the far left is, <i>cf.</i> speech codes, mandatory segregation on campus, street riots following elections, the hecklers' veto, place all manner of human endeavor subject to state control. Same diff... We got a tyranny and it has been in the making since the New Deal*. If you gotta pick sides, ask yourself, "Self, who has the cooler uniforms, the tyranny of the left or right?"

There's a spike in "HATE CRIMES!!!!!"** against the RoPers and the Jooze! It seems that a lot of the crimes against the RoPers are mostly hoaxes and those against the Jews are often committed by the Ropers.

Then, I stopped reading.

*FDR, thanks for helping the Russkies crush the Krauts. No thanks for the Atomic bomb and the New Deal.

**Actually, most crimes are "hate" crimes. What's a "love" crime? R...(nope, I don't need that problem)