Greg Turner wrote:
>Anyways, it's a bit of a project in-and-of-itself... it's important to
>think ahead, but there's no point in planning out the finer details
>until we have the basics implemented.
>>I have a question. Why is it that we think that all possible DLLs must
come under the base WINE source tree? Even MS don't work this way. In a
way, Wine is just the PE loader and linker, and the wineserver. Due to
natural constrains, it may be wise to put anyone that needs to talk to
wineserver under the WINE tree as well. Why is it, however, that
everyone else are also under the same tree?
Shachar