Like this:

Counted breaths to 10. Imagined relaxation by falling like Alice through the rabbit hole. Gently falling. Decided I’d rise instead as a metaphor. Rose through clouds into space. Continued to rise up, now in space, without direction.

Entered tubes of energy and flowed with them, just observing. Stopped at some unknown place. I was before someone. I knelt and fell into respectful meditation with being I was with. Had communication that I was not to know what should happen or what purpose was just yet. Pretty direct communication, I felt the being had nothing more to say about subject. Stayed for a moment. Some more non-directional communication and decided to move on.

Stood up put my arms outstretched as a symbol of servitude to the being I was with. Gently gathered and released energy and decided to move on. Entered tunnel again, with arms still outstretched. Moved into higher realm.

Out of the abstract colors of the tunnel I was in, came a heavenly earthlike scene. Rolling green hills, blue cloud filled sky a couple hundred yards from the edge of a forest like “boundary”. Out of the boundary came a whispery, angelic being on a whispery, angelic horse, both in white. The being slowly stopped before me. I again knelt in meditative, respectful servitude. This caught the visitor off guard. He/she communicated the awkwardness that I was kneeling before he/she as opposed to the other way around. I communicated that under the present mission and purpose of incarnation, I am to be held at the level I am currently working in. I stated that at the moment I was in servitude to them and was to do as they wished.

I asked he/she to separate and he/she did. There were now 7 angelic beings on horses before me, each displaying a unique personality. I communicated that time was short and I requested I be enlightened as to my purpose. One stated that the time is still not right yet. Another, while looking away from me, stated that I would probably fail at my mission anyway, and that was the reason I shouldn’t be told. I was still in a state of meditative energy gathering and releasing. To silence him or better yet comfort his reluctance, I gathered creative energy and turned the rolling hills into a beautifully, lush tropical forest, full of playful life displaying more than all the colors imaginable.

We were all quiet. No one was looking around at the newly changed environment, they were still looking at me, staring at me in quiet shock at what just transpired. The display was one of such potent creative force that the reason behind my not knowing was now blatantly obvious to everyone there.

I was back to meditative state of energy exchange and openness, awaiting a request. After an awkward moment of silence, the original being stated “The creative act you have just displayed is what you are there to do”. I thought to myself that if this was the case, there is simply no room nor purpose for such work during the current state of affairs on Earth.

After a moment, the beings became one again and slowly dissipated into the forest.

I sat there to reflect.

I took a quick glimpse at the environment and then communicated to the planet that I was on. “Do you wish for this life to stay, or to be reabsorbed back into your conscious body?” The planet stated it was benevolent, and did not have use for such life at this time. I then returned the environment to its original condition. “Thank you.” Said the planet. “Before I leave, do you have any wishes?” I asked. “I am lonely.” it answered. I slipped back into focus and found the planet alone in space (different dimension). I quickly found a logo, a sun and made a request to the sun. “Would you like to be accompanied by a lonely, benevolent planet seeking creative companionship?” “Yes” it stated. I then moved the planet into orbit around it’s new friend. I then returned to self.

I have been disregarding these kind of meditative experiences because they are so subtle. Might as well begin writing them down, eh? Hope you enjoyed.

It seems that a group of scientist DID use the idea of sonoluminescence to create fusion. It is called Acoustic Inertial Confinement Fusion. When they successfully produced results in France at NURETH-11 for peer review, they shortly afterward got hammered by the ‘institutions’.DARPA’s involved, UCLA, Oak Ridge National Lab, Purdue University, and a few science journals.Initially one of the scientists did experiments of Sonofusion at Oak Ridge National Labs, but they couldn’t get a good enough ratio of repeatable results. I think the story goes like this…so, they went to Purdue University. They used a variation in techniques and became successful. This is when they decided to go to NURETH-11. A lawsuit was brought into the mix, and all funding got cut off and they got caught up in legal issues, which resulted in the main scientist getting debarred and discredited (no funding, etc.), though affidavits out the butt proved otherwise.

See below for the articles etc.,

Read this letter.Lahey Letter to Physics Today
Feb. 20, 2009
Response from Marty Hanna is below Lahey letterYou write, “Independent research groups have so far failed to confirm the result of Taleyarkhan’s group.” Indeed, this is at the heart of much of the controversy concerning bubble fusion. However, this is false. Edward Forringer, William Bugg, Adam Butt, and Yiban Xu have performed and reported independent confirmations of bubble fusion. This is in addition to on-demand public demonstration of successful outcomes of bubble fusion on two occasions.
[link to newenergytimes.com]

Now, who is Lahey? Google DARPA Lahey.

Holy crap. I think I found a cover-up. This is crazy…

Umm, check this out. This Lahey guy says they successfully did it!
Lahey AffidavitTo the best of my
recollection, I received from Taleyarkhan summary documentation of successful sonofusion
results in June, 2005. How in the world could someone surmise that DARPA-UCLA funds,
which arrived into the Purdue financial system in June, 2005, actually contribute to the intense
underlying research to find a way to self-nucleate in a totally different fluid-mixture of vastly
different properties, in a differently designed test cell, with random vs timed nucleation, conduct
a large array oftests, including careful control experiments, within “seconds” of receiving
funding from a new source? The mere thought of suggesting the use of such funds for something
already largely accomplished (and only requiring publication) is totally bizarre.
[link to newenergytimes.com]

cont.

39. The above mentioned issues highlighted in the Press are a either wrongful or
inaccurate allegations against Taleyarkhan (and in many respects all of us who worked with him)
and have no merit. These are apparently desperate attempts by our competitors to detract from
our seminal work on the discovery of sonofusion.
[link to newenergytimes.com]

Purdue News
____March 2, 2004Evidence bubbles over to support tabletop nuclear fusion device
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. – Researchers are reporting new evidence supporting their earlier discovery of an inexpensive “tabletop” device that uses sound waves to produce nuclear fusion reactions.
Rusi TaleyarkhanThe researchers believe the new evidence shows that “sonofusion” generates nuclear reactions by creating tiny bubbles that implode with tremendous force. Nuclear fusion reactors have historically required large, multibillion-dollar machines, but sonofusion devices might be built for a fraction of that cost.
[link to www.purdue.edu]

Bubblegate Testimonials and AffidavitsBack to Bubblegate PortalBefore Lefteri Tsoukalas was removed as the head of the Purdue School of Nuclear Engineering, an extra-legal committee that he organized produced the Feb. 23, 2006, Statement from Adam Butt. Someone provided this document to Kenneth Chang of The New York Times. Chang has declined to confirm or deny whether Tsoukalas provided the document. Chang has confirmed that he received other related documents from Tsoukalas. Chang made the decision to publish the unsigned, unnotarized, unsworn, unverified document.

The Statement from Adam Butt caused severe problems for Rusi Taleyarkhan, a professor in the School of Nuclear Engineering. In response, numerous people came to Taleyarkhan’s defense with testimonials and affidavits. A number of the affidavits accuse Tsoukalas of serious grievances. Some of them are now part of the public record in legal proceedings.
[link to newenergytimes.com]

On March 1, 2006 I helped set up two experiment stations for review by the visitors. The
first and main station involved experiments needed for the DARPA-UCLA project (i.e., using
external neutrons). The second experiment involved self-nucleation for which Ken Suslick of
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign himself was invited to and did indeed randomly select
neutron detectors for mounting on the test cells and for use as controls. He also insisted on doing
the experiment in a particular way and we accommodated each of his requests during setup. At
the end of the day, the detectors showed positive signatures of neutron emission as evidenced by
several people in the audience. Neither I, nor anyone from Purdue engaged in misconduct of any
kind and in fact went out ofour way to assist the visitors engage in a successful review.
[link to newenergytimes.com]

They did it, didn’t they? I mean, they did, but then funding got cut-off and they tried to discredit the researchers. Bubblegate.

This paper provides an update on developments since the first announcement of the discovery in 2002 of acoustic inertial confinement (a.k.a bubble) nuclear fusion. A theoretical foundation for the supercompression of acoustically driven deuterated bubble clusters has been developed and published. Initially, bubble fusion experiments used external neutron sources for nucleating bubble clusters, and despite compelling evidence, lingering doubts remained because of the use of external neutrons to maintain neutron production. This was overcome using a self-nucleation method. In those novel experiments, seeding of nanometer bubbles was accomplished using nuclear-decay recoils from dissolved uranyl nitrate. Bubble fusion experiments have been replicated successfully, and confirmatory results were reported at least five times since 2005. Moreover, speculations and controversies about the discovery related to our bubble fusion experiments have now been conclusively addressed, rebutted, and dismissed.
[link to pubs.acs.org]

___________________________________________
A standing wave of sound creates a bubble in liquid. When the bubble implodes, light is emitted. This is called: Sonoluminescence. Awesome.

Sonoluminescence is the emission of short bursts of light from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound.

In 1989 a major experimental advance was introduced by Felipe Gaitan and Lawrence Crum, who produced stable single-bubble sonoluminescence (SBSL). In SBSL, a single bubble trapped in an acoustic standing wave, emits a pulse of light with each compression of the bubble within the standing wave. This technique allowed a more systematic study of the phenomenon, because it isolated the complex effects into one stable, predictable bubble. It was realized that the temperature inside the bubble was hot enough to melt steel. Interest in sonoluminescence was renewed when an inner temperature of such a bubble well above one million kelvins was postulated. This temperature is thus far not conclusively proven, though recent experiments conducted by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign indicate temperatures around 20,000 K.

Sonoluminescence can occur when a sound wave of sufficient intensity induces a gaseous cavity within a liquid to collapse quickly. This cavity may take the form of a pre-existing bubble, or may be generated through a process known as cavitation. Sonoluminescence in the laboratory can be made to be stable, so that a single bubble will expand and collapse over and over again in a periodic fashion, emitting a burst of light each time it collapses. For this to occur, a standing acoustic wave is set up within a liquid, and the bubble will sit at a pressure anti-node of the standing wave. The frequencies of resonance depend on the shape and size of the container in which the bubble is contained.

~ The light flashes from the bubbles are extremely short—between 35 and a few hundred picoseconds long—with peak intensities of the order of 1–10 mW.

~ The bubbles are very small when they emit the light—about 1 micrometre in diameter—depending on the ambient fluid (e.g., water) and the gas content of the bubble (e.g., atmospheric air).

~ Single-bubble sonoluminescence pulses can have very stable periods and positions. In fact, the frequency of light flashes can be more stable than the rated frequency stability of the oscillator making the sound waves driving them. However, the stability analyses of the bubble show that the bubble itself undergoes significant geometric instabilities, due to, for example, the Bjerknes forces and Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities.

~ The addition of a small amount of noble gas (such as helium, argon, or xenon) to the gas in the bubble increases the intensity of the emitted light.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Like this:

I was asked to play in my lucid dream sandbox about this.So, I played last night in my sand box. I am getting ready for work, so I can’t write it out now, but I saw why this statement must be true. This is from the paper quoted.

[link to arxiv.org]“An answer to “why no magnetic monopoles?” is now clear. So long as there were thought toexist the electrical monopoles known as charges, a deep belief in symmetry demanded that we consider and look for magnetic monopoles. This study concludes that there are no electrical monopoles. To this extent, symmetry has been recovered.”

My study (hehe) also concluded there cannot be any monopoles. Monopoles instability actually LEADS TO dipoles. They either collapse, or form dipoles. (I need to explain why…but later) Funny, I am looking at the stuff they cannot see. It has to do with contained spin forms that are spiral. What creates the spin forms? Light. Light is the only TRUE constant, therefor there are no fluctuations in the speed of the spin. The only way for dipoles to remain absolutely stable like they do, is with an absolute constant defining it.

More later.

Also, I played for about 2 hours with Klein Bubbles. Awesome. You know what I requested to ‘see’? That’s right. Black holes. BTW, they come in all sorts of shapes, not merely spherical. I imagine the ones nested at the center of the galaxies must be mainly spherical…but, they are absolutely incredible things! I even experimented with a supernova entering a black hole. WHOA! The result the volume was annihilated, but the skin still existed, although very shriveled up and emaciated. For relation, the size of the volume would be a house, and the skin would be a quarter after the interaction and implode/explode of the two.

Also, I experimented with injecting a massive object into the Klein Bubbles, and it resulted in a Klein Bottle effect.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

“Since matter is created from photons, and photons are entirely electromagnetic, it follows that matter is indeed made up of EM fields. They are arranged differently, in light and in particles.

I have found a way to arrange the EM fields to achieve the particle properties of charge, mass, angular momentum, spin, and stability. The paper is posted on arxiv under physics/0611266. The electron can be modeled as a dipolar B field that morphs into a toroidal E field, and back, at the Compton frequency. The electric and magnetic fluxes are
quantized. Precession of this spinning model about a different axis then creates “charge”. Mass is the encapsulated kinetic energy of these changing and spinning EM fields. Charge is created by a vxB mechanism of the spinning dipolar B field.”
[link to lofi.forum.physorg.com]

BTW, I wish I could express these visions more accurately, but it is extremely difficult in words.

Once again, the shapes are very similar to what Walter Russell was trying to express. In this video, you see two spiral forms mirroring each other. My vision was a little different, and more complex than this, but it will help visualization.

Instead of starting with two spins, start with one. And it is spinning FAST! The one begins extending, and as it extends its Spiraling Conical Filament, it actually creates the field it is formed in (torus shape). At the far end of the ‘invisible’ torus field, the extending SCF begins ‘bunching’ up and ‘mirroring’ the original spinning vortex. As the mirroring spinning vortex grows (it will eventually be the same size as the original), the two begin attracting together, and getting closer. As they get close, the amplitude is rising inside the two spiraling vortices, which creates an increase in repulsion. Then, they both stop attracting and stabilize at a particular distance apart. When I look close at the interaction, I notice there are streaks of multicolored light being emitted from between the two phased locked vortices.

When I was doing the experiment, I couldn’t figure out what the slow colored lights were being emitted. It wasn’t until later today that I reread my posts, and realized what it had to be…CHARGE!

“Precession of this spinning model about a different axis then creates “charge”. Mass is the encapsulated kinetic energy of these changing and spinning EM fields. Charge is created by a vxB mechanism of the spinning dipolar B field.“

Like this:

“Since matter is created from photons, and photons are entirely electromagnetic, it follows that matter is indeed made up of EM fields. They are arranged differently, in light and in particles.I have found a way to arrange the EM fields to achieve the particle properties of charge, mass, angular momentum, spin, and stability. The paper is posted on arxiv under physics/0611266. The electron can be modeled as a dipolar B field that morphs into a toroidal E field, and back, at the Compton frequency. The electric and magnetic fluxes are
quantized. Precession of this spinning model about a different axis then creates “charge”. Mass is the encapsulated kinetic energy of these changing and spinning EM fields. Charge is created by a vxB mechanism of the spinning dipolar B field.”
[link to lofi.forum.physorg.com]Is the electron a photon with
toroidal topology?
[link to docs.google.com]