JOHN MENADUE. We need to curb rent-seekers and lobbyists.

In the series “Fairness, Opportunity and Security” last year I drew attention to the pervasive loss of trust in institutions. Essential Research revealed that the six least trusted institutions were: the news media, state parliaments, trade unions, business groups, religious organisations and political parties. The three most trusted institutions were all public: the ABC, High Court and Reserve Bank. In light of Jacquie Lambie’s proposals to curb the ‘lobbying racket in Canberra’ I decided to repost an earlier blog on the collapse of trust with the growth in rent seeking and lobbying, with some up dating.

Our politicians disgrace themselves and us. Former Trade Minister Andrew Robb walked out of the Cabinet and Parliament after negotiating the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement and into a $880,000-a-year job with a Chinese billionaire who has a 99-year-lease on the Port of Darwin. This followed a string of earlier ministers who took advantage of their ministerial experience to profit from lobbying. In earlier days, Peter Reith, a former Defence Minister, took a job with TENIX, a defence logistics firm. Former Howard ministers – Nick Minchin, Mark Vaile, Michael Wooldridge, Peter Costello, and Richard Alston – went to work as lobbyists. These days, Mark Arbib lobbies for Crown and Martin Ferguson lobbies for the resource and energy sector. Stephen Conroy joined the misnamed James Packer backed ‘Responsible Wagering Association’ and Helen Coonan joined Crown.

There has been a revolving door between former Department of Defence officials and arms suppliers. The former head of Defence and Prime Minister and Cabinet Ian Watt was appointed non Executive Chairman of BAE Systems Australia which is a major supplier to the Australian Defence Forces. Dennis Richardson, the former secretary of the Department of Defence, told the Senate Estimates Committee in October 2015 that the relationship between Department of Defence and the arms industry is vulnerable to ethical breakdown because of the steady flow of staff between the two. He added that the specialist knowledge involved in defence procurement, which costs billions of taxpayer dollars a year, means that there is a heavy exchange of staff between defence and the industry which supplies it.

Sean Costello, a former senior adviser to Defence Minister David Johnstone resigned and then took the position of CEO with the French company DCNS Australia which subsequently won the 50 billion dollar submarine contract.

In this blog I have written about the way the US-led military, armaments and intelligence complex have effectively taken over Australia’s foreign policy (Military/Security takeover of Australia’s foreign policy). The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is largely ignored and the US complex which has seduced our Department of Defence really calls the shots. The hidden ‘security state’ is growing daily in power. It cannot be trusted to act in Australia’s interest. It is corrupting our public life and endangering our safety.

British and American arms suppliers like Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems make substantial funding contributions to our “independent” think-tank, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. which advises the Australian Government on defence policy . Weapons suppliers like Lockheed Martin are now also funding the Australian War Memorial. How can we trust institutions like ASPI and the AWM that take money from extremely powerful foreign weapons manufactures whose prosperity depends on never ending wars which the US has pursued in almost its entire history.

And it is not just the weapons industry that engenders mistrust. Many ‘independent’ think tanks like IPA and Sydney Institute are funded in secret by powerful vested interests. Yet the ABC and other outlets allow people from these compromised organizations to appear in their media.

Paul Frijters and Gigi Foster also examined our Rich 200 list. They found that “Over 80 per cent of the wealthiest Australians have made their fortunes in property, mining, banking, superannuation and finance generally – all heavily regulated industries in which fortunes can be made by getting favourable property rezoning’s, planning law exemptions, mining concessions, labour law exemptions, money-creation powers and mandated markets of many stripes.” (PETER MARTIN. Game of Mates: How billionaires get uber-rich at our expense.)

In 2015, two US economists, Sutirtha Bagchi and Jan Svejnar, used the international Forbes Rich List to estimate the proportion of billionaires in 22 countries who owed their wealth to political favours. Australia ranked third worst in the world and only slightly better than Columbia and India. In Australia, political connections and lobbying count for much more than entrepreneurial or business skills. We have a crony capitalist society which abuses trust in which business people incessantly lobby government and politicians to rig the market in their favour. In the guise of ‘getting rid of red tape’ Important safety and consumer protections are removed or not enforced .

Political lobbyists are having a field day in Australia. At my last count, there were over 900 full-time independent lobbyists working in Canberra. That is over 30 for every cabinet minister. On top of these “third party” lobbyists there are the special interests who conduct their own lobbying: e.g. the Minerals Council and the Australian Pharmacy Guild. These lobbyists promote a whole range of interests (e.g. mining, clubs, hospitals, private health insurance funds, businesses and hotels) that have all successfully challenged government policy and the public interest. Just think what the Mining Council of Australia did to subvert the super-profit tax and Clubs Australia to thwart gambling reform. There is a lobbying swamp in Canberra that badly needs draining. These secret but powerful lobbyists are doing enormous damage to public trust.

The wealthy polluters together with political and media allies successfully destroyed an Emissions Trading Scheme. A decade later we still do not have a power generation system that reduces pollution and ensures reliable supply

And then there are the banks. As Ian McAuley has put it in this blog: “Somehow we have allowed the finance sector – banks, life-insurers, general insurers, health insurance and brokers – to morph from a service function supporting the real economy to the status of a major industry in its own right.” They are a bloated overhead.

As Paul Volcker put it: the only useful innovation banks have come up with in the last 20 years is the ATM. The banking sector has grown enormously while contributing little of real value to the community. Add to this the unethical behaviour, enormous profits and greedy CEO salaries in the sector, it is no surprise that we have lost trust in the banks. That loss of faith has not been helped by senior Treasury officers leaving Treasury to join our large bloated banks.

But the greatest corruptor of public trust in Australia and also in UK and US is the Murdoch Media. It seeks to discredit almost all government action except when government intervention is in its favour. Think media licences. Government favours have been critical in building the Murdoch Media. Yet this organisation chooses deliberately to discredit the whole public and political process which provides so many essential public services, It ruthlessly attacks politicians unless they are acting for the benefit of Murdoch. Government intervention is good when it is to the benefit of the Murdoch Media but not otherwise.

Increasingly, young people are asking why they should trust the older generation and their corrupted institutions. Jeremy Corbyn tapped into their dissatisfaction. The older generation shows little concern for the decay of our planet and the aspirations of the young to own a home of their own. Our politicians are not game to tackle the power of institutions like the Property Council that wants to keep property prices high at the expense of young non property owners..

The failure of our major institutions, and particularly our political parties, has made many people turn to NGOs like GetUp! to express their concerns and press for change. In response, the privileged now seek to curb those NGOs.- even raiding trade union offices.

We need a whole range of institutional reforms to win back the trust of the community, particularly the young. We need to close the revolving door that allows politicians , senior public servants and even former Prime Ministers to take lucrative jobs on retirement in the private sector. Isn’t their pension enough? None should be allowed to work for three years with firms they have had dealings with as ministers or senior officials. We clearly need to draw stricter rules for lobbyists and make their activities transparent and public. We need a federal ICAC and major political donations reform. We urgently need a public inquiry into the role of Parliament and how it can be made an effective deliberative body again. In this blog the late Ian Marsh strongly presented the case for parliamentary reform and how it could be done. We need renewal of our political parties so that they reflect their voter support rather than a small group of factional overlords.

The UK election showed that genuine, honest and sincere leaders can encourage people, particularly the young to ignore fear and division engendered by vested interests and the right wing media. Young people know that their trust has been abused and hitherto have decided to opt out with leaders they didn’t trust. They rejected the bankrupt policies and leaders of the past and embraced Jeremy Corbin.

Trust, once lost, is hard to regain. It is a pervasive problem in Australian public life today, and no group is less trusting than the young and understandably so.

Can that mistrust be galvanised to build a more vibrant and caring Australia and save the planet for future generations?

2 Responses to JOHN MENADUE. We need to curb rent-seekers and lobbyists.

To the question you lastly raise John, my answer is a fervent “I hope so”.

Trouble is though, as I have noted elsewhere, the perfect response from many a politician to a curly question, and thus one to be avoided, is to say – with feigned surprise: “Problem? What problem?” To this impervious stupidity may now be added the po-faced response from any lobbyist when (rarely) queried about their most recent employment: “Conflict? What conflict?” Given such an equally “end of argument” answer, where do you go from there?

The point you make about the AWM is valid. It may be possible that the current director Dr. Nelson firmly believes there is no problem in the AWM receiving sponsorship from “…extremely powerful foreign weapons manufactures…”. I believe there is and I doubt that I am alone in this. However the director, when queried, may respond that such a question either has no merit or in any event is irrelevant.

As an ex-Services member, I have no qualms in saying that the AWM may once have legitimately represented something valuable in our culture, but no longer does so.