Hi all,
I started to draft a response to Kjetil's open comments.
My general rationale here is that - despite the ongoing discussions on other lists - I think that
the rationale of the SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol document is merely to provide a RESTful
version of a subset of the SPARQL protocol, i.e. to provide some more direct acceess to a
SPARQL endpoints directly via HTTP operations.
Anything beyond that is IMO beyond our WG's charter (that's particular on Kjetil's last comment, but I tried to address all his open comments now...)
Along these lines, I drafted the following response:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:KK-12
this still has two open TODO's which I'd kindly ask Chime to have a look.
best,
Axel