It's a reasonable price. When you consider the original price (US$4000) of the first 22-inch Apple Cinema display (1999?).

Yes, I find it pretty reasonable also. Now I guess it would make more sense with a graphic card able to drive it. :-)

I am also not to sure that the current software I use (as well as the solution I chose to use to replace Photoshop in the coming months) would be able to leverage elegantly this additional resolution without introducing issues in terms of usability (menus/icons too small,...).

So I'll probably wait 1 year unless my Dell 30 inch dies before (which is possible based on recent warnings).

It doesn't take anything special to drive 4k screens for normal use. Gaming, yes, apps, nope. There have been sub $1300 models for a few months gamers have been playing with. Not pro color, but still sweet resolution! Drivers have supported this res and much more for a long time.

It doesn't take anything special to drive 4k screens for normal use. Gaming, yes, apps, nope. There have been sub $1300 models for a few months gamers have been playing with. Not pro color, but still sweet resolution! Drivers have supported this res and much more for a long time.

How do you do that on a Mac Pro 2,1?

I am aware about the Seki 4k tv, but that is a 50 inch screen, correct? I am not sure I would want to use such a large display for photographic applications. Its reliability also seems questionable according to online reports.