--- Jean-Michel Hiver <hiver.j@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> >You realy didn't give a whole layout, I was assuming you where using
> >crossover cables.
> >
> I see - sorry :-)
>
> Well it would be something like this:
>
> Box1 (dedicated server)
> - eth0 -> monster bandwith, not a problem
>
> Box2 (home)
> - eth0 (192.168.1.2) -> DSL nat router thing 192.168.1.1
> - eth1 (192.168.1.12) -> DSL nat router thing 192.168.1.11
>
I have to ask, what's wrong with a T1 line? I think it would be cheaper
and there would be a single 1.5468Mbps line.
> Now the big question is: how do I do in order to route VPN traffic
> through the right gateway? At the moment everything goes to one DSL
> connection...
>
> Say I have tap0 going through UDP/8000 and tap1 going through UDP/8001,
> and my default gateway is $GATEWAY1. What's the simplest way for me to
> route UDP/8001 traffic through $GATEWAY2?
>
> I currently use firehol because it's nice and simple. Is it something I
> can do with firehol?
>
> If you could let me know how to do to this it would be great - I'm stuck
>
> on this one :(
>
> >In any event you will end up using bond or eql(for slow
> >serial links, like if you where using internal DSL cards). This workes
> >for outoging, without VPN, however for incomming trafic(on the other
> end)
> >you will most likely need to setup VPN if you need that to be balanced
> as
> >well.
> >
> >
> Well yeah, especially since all the data is going to be transferred
> trhough one connection and one socket (Asterisk IAX2 VoIP protocol), in
> this case I'm not sure load balancing works very well without VPN.
>
> So it seems that multiple tap VPNs bonded together might do the trick
> nicely. We'll see...
>
> >Also don't forget to use a shaper, I recomend the wonder shaper to
> start
> >with.
> >
> >
> Sure. I think once this is set up I might as well set the server with
> monster bandwith as default gateway - this way I can do traffic shaping
> at both ends of the VPN link.
>
> There's some fairly good VoIP related traffic shapers on voip-info.org -
>
> I'll use them!
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com