Thank you for sharing!

The majority of a sharply divided Virginia Supreme Court, addressing a question of law posed by a federal judge in the state, has ruled that an employer using asbestos products in its workplace has a duty of care to nonemployees exposed to asbestos-tainted clothing.

In a 4-3 ruling, the majority on Thursday said that while there’s little precedent from the courts or guidance from the state legislature on the issue, it was clear that if the employer knows or should have known that employees’ clothing dusted with asbestos could be handled by others, there is a clear duty of care.

“This duty is not abstract: a specific course of conduct gives rise to a specific duty extended to specific persons,” wrote Senior Justice LeRoy Millett Jr. for the majority in Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls.

Justices William Mims, Cleo Powell and Stephen McCullough joined in the ruling.

Chief Justice Donald Lemons issued a dissent, which was joined by Justices Elizabeth McClanahan and Denham Kelsey. McClanahan also issued a separate dissent, which Lemons and Kelsey joined.

The court agreed to hear the case at the request of U.S. District Judge Arenda Allen of the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting in Newport News. Allen asked the court to answer whether Virginia law mandates that employers owe a duty of care to nonemployees who become ill after coming into contact with employees’ asbestos-covered clothing.

The lawsuit will now return to Allen.

The lawsuit was filed by Wesley Quisenberry, the son of Wanda Quisenberry, who died as the result of complications from mesothelioma, which is caused by exposure to asbestos.

Wanda Quisenberry was diagnosed with mesothelioma in December 2013, and died three years later, according to the opinion.

Wanda’s father was a man named Bennie Plessinger, who worked for Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock from 1942 to 1977. The shipyard is now owned by Huntington Ingalls and is the largest shipbuilder for the military in the United States.

During the years that Wanda Quisenberry lived with her father, she cleaned his asbestos-covered clothes on a regular basis before eventually being diagnosed with mesothelioma, the suit alleges.

After she died, her son, Wesley Quisenberry, filed a lawsuit against the company, claiming that the company failed to warn employees that they should not wear asbestos-covered clothing home, that there was no education offered about the dangers of asbestos, and that there were no services provided at the work site for employees to clean themselves. The suit alleged negligence, and wanton and willful misconduct.

The company has contended that, under Virginia law, it does not owe a duty of care to anyone with whom it is not directly associated.

The Supreme Court majority disagreed.

The lack of a direct relationship is “not … dispositive to the existence of a duty,” Millett said. The duty of care can extend to “those within reach of defendant’s conduct.”

“The … hazard created by the Shipyard—asbestos dust—was allegedly released through the Shipyard’s course of conduct and moved to place Wanda in danger,” Millett said.

The dissenters said the majority went too far in establishing a duty of care to nonemployees.

“The opinion adopts the concept of duty to mankind generally, and empty duty ‘owed to all the world,’ and is unprecedented in Virginia,” Lemons said.

Added McClanahan: “In short, the take-home duty recognized by the majority is a newly created duty … that is wholly unsupported by our precedent.”

One of the estate’s lead attorneys, Jonathan George, said he was pleased with the ruling.

“It’s consistent with our understanding of the employer’s responsibility to nonemployees, at least in regard to asbestos,” said George, of the Richmond office of Waters Kraus & Paul.

Huntington Ingalls’ lead attorney, Wendy McGraw of the Norfolk office of Hunton Andrews Kurth, did not return a call seeking comment.

“These were not slips of the tongue," wrote U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, who ordered plaintiffs attorney Aimee Wagstaff to pay $500 as a sanction for her conduct during opening statements Monday.

Featured Firms

Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone

2 Oliver St #608

Boston,
MA02109

857-444-6468

www.marksalomone.com

Gary Martin Hays & Associates
P.C.

235 Peachtree St NE #400

Atlanta,
GA30303

800-898-4297

www.garymartinhays.com

Smith & Hassler

225 N Loop W #525

Houston,
TX77008

(877) 777-1529

www.smithandhassler.com

Presented by BigVoodoo

More from ALM

Learn how your firm can apply technologies such as intelligent automation and AI across the entire client lifecycle to win more business, operate more profitably, and deliver higher levels of client satisfaction.

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.

From Data to Decisions

Exclusive Depth and Reach.

Legal Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.

Big Pictures and Fine Details

Legal Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.

Savvy law leaders should join this webcast to explore how inefficient and antiquated business operations are hindering success, areas to consolidate and streamline operations, and how emerging technologies can help achieve these operational efficiencies.

GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVIS LLP

BLICK LAW

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters.
Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss.
Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.