What's with AMD doing this staggered/controlled review/preview with all their stuff recently. Its down right deceptive. E.g Tomshardware testing only gaming tasks.

Anandtech tests a 35watts AMD processor vs a 15watt intel one. Both leaving out battery benchmarks. I am happy you guys atleast left out the benchmarks for the most part entirely than bend to AMD's will of trying to paint something that would flatter them.

Because some publications were allowed to benchmark these APUs under VERY controlled conditions at a recent event. Hence why there's very little info. We chose not to include skewed performance results in official chart form.

What's with AMD doing this staggered/controlled review/preview with all their stuff recently. Its down right deceptive. E.g Tomshardware testing only gaming tasks.

Anandtech tests a 35watts AMD processor vs a 15watt intel one. Both leaving out battery benchmarks. I am happy you guys atleast left out the benchmarks for the most part entirely than bend to AMD's will of trying to paint something that would flatter them.

For the record, the most recent Intel release did not include benchmarks either...so it seems that both companies are guilty of a staggered release...

One thing was missing. You did not do a comparison to the fastest Intel desktop cpus they are supposed to be competing against. Don't just show the low power chips. AMD is stating their fx apus are going to be replacing all chips in the future in the desktop so they are now also desktop chips and need to be compared to the desktop chips available. Too many more reviews like this I will never touch anything AMD again.