How does Davidic Construction comport or compare with other chiastic analysis?

How is it that all these prophets, whose writings transverse millennia, continent and sociological influences come up with the same literary pattern?

Did these prophets know they were conforming to the pattern?

Does the fact that chiasmus has been found in the writings and revelations of Joseph Smith diminish the authenticity of the Book of Mormon?

Though I don’t really disagree with your analysis, it all seems very abstract. Can you make it more concrete? Show how Davidic chiasmus influences our reading of a specific passage of scripture?

Don’t you think that your analysis of Martin Luther King’s speech is a little stretched? Do you really think that Mr. King was inspired, especially considering his questionable political and moral background? Do you think that it is appropriate to list this speech alongside other prophetic works?

What does “temple/endowment imagery” specifically refer to?

What relevance does “temple/endowment imagery” have to apostolic literature

What is a Davidic Plea?

What is a Davidic Curse, Woe, or Malediction?

Why isn’t there more commentary contained within this Davidic treatise?

Are there any caveats?

Biblical scholars have long sought to find an all encompassing governing structure that matches the cadence, thought, rhythm, etc., without unanimous acceptance or approval. Does Davidic Chiasmus selectively pick up themes, without direct textual or rhetorical connections, to come up with its particular arrangement?