Role in IT decision-making process:Align Business & IT GoalsCreate IT StrategyDetermine IT NeedsManage Vendor RelationshipsEvaluate/Specify Brands or VendorsOther RoleAuthorize PurchasesNot Involved

Work Phone:

Company:

Company Size:

Industry:

Street Address

City:

Zip/postal code

State/Province:

Country:

Occasionally, we send subscribers special offers from select partners. Would you like to receive these special partner offers via e-mail?YesNo

Your registration with Eweek will include the following free email newsletter(s):News & Views

By submitting your wireless number, you agree that eWEEK, its related properties, and vendor partners providing content you view may contact you using contact center technology. Your consent is not required to view content or use site features.

By clicking on the "Register" button below, I agree that I have carefully read the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy and I agree to be legally bound by all such terms.

Judge Denies ATandT Request to Bump Verizon Ads

AT&T's request that Verizon pull its five "There's a Map for That" ads has been denied, though attorneys will have another shot to argue their case. In the meantime, AT&T has aired a new ad of its own, starring not misfit toys but actor Luke Wilson.

A federal judge in Atlanta has denied AT&T's request that competitor Verizon Wireless be made to pull its series of "There's a Map for That" advertisements, according to a Nov. 18 report from the Associated Press.

AP reports that the judge has scheduled a Dec. 16 hearing, in which attorneys for AT&T will have another chance to argue their case.

AT&T believes that the Verizon ads, which show 3G coverage maps for both carriers, are potentially misleading to customers, who may mistakenly think that AT&T offers no coverage in non-3G coverage areas. In the suit it filed against Verizon on Nov. 3, AT&T attorneys stated, "Verizon has stepped over the line of legitimate comparative advertising."

Further reading

The Verizon response went on to state that AT&T has invested tens of millions of dollars in its 3G network, while Verizon has invested billions of dollars since 2004 and now has a network that "covers five times more of the United States than AT&T's 3G network."

In the commercial, Wilson-against an empty warehouse backdrop, and with an orange magnetic board with a checklist-repeats the central points of AT&T's Website letter: "Who has the nation's fastest 3G network?" Wilson asks. "Which network lets you talk and surf the Web at the same time?" "The most popular smartphones? Access to over 100,000 apps?" The answer, of course, is AT&T.

The "zinger"-or really lack of a zinger, hinting at how quickly the ad was likely made-is that Verizon also earns a checked box, for having a "name that starts with the letter V."

Ken Hyers, a senior analyst with Technology Business Research, says the Verizon ads are certainly modifying public perception.

"AT&T is definitely concerned by the impressions being created by the Verizon ads, and they're doing everything they can to put a stop to them," he told eWEEK. "Though as it turns out, there's not a whole lot they can do about them."

Noting that AT&T will have a second shot to argue its case, Hyers added, "For now, they're just going to have to endure them."