This book is a Get Out of Jail Free card and a passport back into the playground.

The aim of this book is to set you free. But free from what? Free from neurosis. Free from the feeling that you have to obey authority. Free from emotional intimidation. Free from addiction. Free from inhibition.

The key to happiness, mental health and being the most that we can be is absolute and unconditional self-acceptance. The paradox is that many of our problems are caused by trying to improve ourselves, censor our thinking, make up for past misdeeds and struggling with our negative feelings whether of depression or aggression.

But if we consider ourselves in our entirety in this very moment, we know these things :

1. Anything we have done is in the past and cannot be changed, thus it is pointless to do anything else but accept it. No regrets or guilt.

2. While our actions can harm others, our thoughts and emotions, in and of themselves, never can. So we should accept them and allow them to be and go where they will. While emotions sometimes drive actions, those who completely accept their emotions and allow themselves to feel them fully, have more choice over how they act in the light of them.

Self-criticism never made anyone a better person. Anyone who does a “good deed” under pressure from their conscience or to gain the approval of others takes out the frustration involved in some other way. The basis for loving behaviour towards others is the ability to love ourselves. And loving ourselves unconditionally, means loving ourselves exactly as we are at this moment.

This might seem to be complacency, but in fact the natural activity of the individual is healthy growth, and what holds us back from it is fighting with those things we can’t change and the free thought and emotional experience which is the very substance of that growth.

It is also available in paperback from Lulu or Amazon for $10 US, plus postage.

The ebook version currently has received 510 ***** out of ***** ratings on U.S. iBooks.

Sunday, 28 April 2013

Group Identification Vs. Freedom

We are all
individual human beings. Paradoxically, this is what unites us.
Though our individual experiences are different, they are all human
experiences and thus share many common features. We are capable of
love but we are prone to fear. Sometimes we think that love and hate
are the great opposites, but it is really fear which is the barrier
to love, and hatred is just one of the masks which fear may wear.

When we feel
truly safe, love is inescapable. It is our natural form of
communication with others and the natural feeling we feel towards
ourselves. To the extent that we put up barriers to loving
communication, we do so because we are frightened. The barriers are
protective. At least they are intended to be. Love is open, honest,
spontaneous and generous communication. If we are afraid, we close
off. If we tell lies it is because we are afraid of what might happen
if someone knew the truth. If our manner is rigid and stereotypical
it is because we are afraid to set sail on the open sea of unending
possibility. And if we are selfish it is because we are holding on to
what we fear we may lose.

Sometimes we
think that fear is simply the conscious experience of feeling
anxious, but that is only its passive form. Whenever we take actions
which are defensive or aggressive we are motivated by a sense of
threat. We may not feel afraid. When we feel consciously afraid it is
because we doubt our ability to meet a perceived threat. Even in the
extreme danger of battle, soldiers often feel no fear while they are
actually fighting. It is in periods of inactivity that anxiety is
most likely to strike.

The protective
barriers which interfere with communication between individuals can
take the form of character armour – fixed defensive habits.
Sometimes we adopt some form of armouring to meet a specific current
threat. If you accidentally knock over a motorbike and then a big
hairy biker comes up and asks you if you saw who did it, you might
consider it wise to put up a barrier to honest communication and say “Fucked if I know." On the other hand, armouring can be
habitual. Past experiences where we “put our foot in it"
may leave us with a chronic underlying fear which prevents us from being
open and spontaneous in what we say.

One common form
of armouring is group identification. Loving communication is
something we can only practice from the basis of our individuality.
To communicate in this way we have to perceive ourselves as
individuals first and members of groups second. The only group we all
belong to is the human race. We may have a gender, a race, a
nationality, a religious affiliation, a sexual orientation... While
these things are not always clearcut, most of us identify to some
extent with some of these groupings. Sometimes, usually if we feel
under threat in some way, we may think of ourselves as a member of a
group first and an individual second. This will be a barrier to
communication. If I communicate with you as one individual human with
another then we begin with our common ground, and from there the fact
that I identify myself as an Australian heterosexual male in his
fifties with left-wing tendencies, a pantheistic belief system, and a
love of movies, gives us rich subject matter for our interaction. Our
differences become a source of great creative possibility. But if a
perceived threat makes me think of myself as an Australian first and
an individual second, then my mode of interaction is dualistically
split into the “Australian" and the “not Australian".
This may not pose a problem if I am communicating with another
Australian, but it will if I'm communicating with someone who is not.
Our common ground is compromised.

Let's look at
some examples of how this can happen. It should be emphasised that,
when a threat is genuine, group identification is a natural reaction
and may be an necessary step along the road to a healthier mode of
interaction. Let's look at the Black Pride and Gay Pride movements.
The threat which led to the development of these forms of group
identification were and are very real. Violence and discrimination
against blacks and gays in various parts of the world have been
extreme. People have been treated as if the colour of their skin or
their sexuality were a cause for shame. And long term prejudice of
this kind easily becomes internalised. People can come to think less
of themselves because of the way they are treated and viewed by
others. So the declaration of pride in the characteristic of which we
have been told we should be ashamed is a crucial step forward. But it
cannot be the end in itself. Our sexuality or the colour of our skin
is not the real source of the pride. Sexuality and race are
characteristics on which we cannot place a value. It isn't better to
have one sexual orientation than another or to be one race rather
than another. The source of pride is the way we as individuals have
dealt with the challenges and threats placed in our path. If we are
black or gay this may involve many cases of prejudice. But the
healthy state towards which we are headed is one in which we are
individuals first and everything else second. And, in the end, a
state in which our self-acceptance is so unequivocal that the very
question “Am I proud of myself?" becomes meaningless.

Religion is another area in which group
identification can take precedence over the individual. We may view
ourselves first as a Christian or a Jew or a Muslim or an atheist and
then as an individual. Or someone else may view us first as a member
of one of these groups and only secondarily as an individual. Fear is
the major factor in both cases. If we are insecure in our own beliefs
then we will downgrade the doubting individual self and cling
desperately to the group identification. And if someone has had bad
experiences which prejudice them against our group then they may find
it hard to see past our religious affiliation to the individual human
who holds those beliefs. It is this insecurity which is the basis of
religious intolerance and you can find it in many if not most
religions and also amongst atheists. Insecurity about one's own
belief system takes the form of an inability to agree to disagree.
One finds minorities in Christianity and Islam whose fear won't allow
them to enter into friendly communication with those of a different
faith. Among atheists there are those who argue that even moderates
of any faith should share the blame for things done by extremists
because they are “enablers". I read a comment from one in
which he said something along the lines of “Even a moderate
Christian thinks you are going to Hell for your lack of faith."
Now, leaving aside the fact that many modern Christians don't even
believe in Hell, I ask myself “So what?" As long as I don't
believe I'm going to Hell why should it worry me that someone else
does? I would be most happy to be friends with such a person. I'm
secure enough in my belief system that I'm sure we could agree to
disagree on the whole Hell issue and still find much to talk about
and productive things to do together.

One of the starkest examples of group
identification is what happens in time of war. When our country is
attacked we close ranks and become nationalistic in our thinking.

If fear is the basis for both defensive
and aggressive behaviour, it is worth asking ourselves what is the
basis for safety. Sometimes defensive behaviour, either personal or
military, can preserve our life against a present danger. But can it
be the source of longterm safety or freedom? There is always a price
to pay in both freedom and safety from defensive behaviour. Sometimes
the benefits are greater than the price, sometimes not. On the
personal level we can see that our armour cuts us off from a life of
creative loving interaction with all of our fellows. In the case of
international conflict, nations often end up sacrificing personal
freedoms by instituting conscription or imposing censorship, and
there can be great loss of life, international reputation, mental and
physical health of surviving combatants, etc. Defensive behaviour may
be necessary when a threat occurs, but if we really want to increase
our safety and freedom then we have to look at preventative measures.
The social health of our community is like the health of our body.
What makes us healthy? Is it the medicine we take when we are sick?
Or is it the healthy food and exercise which makes us get sick less
often?

Communication is the key to freedom,
happiness, safety and creation. All of these things grow out of
communication. Freedom is the ability to do the things we want to do and
not have to do the things we don't. Without communication we can do
very little. Most of the things which make us feel happy involve some
form of communication. Sometimes it is one way communication, as when we enjoy watching something or listening to something. Sometimes it is
communicating with others, which can range from a chat over a cup of
tea to engaging in an orgy. A large part of safety is knowing about
potential threats. A lack of communication can have dire results. A
young man sits alone day after day, not wanting to have any
communication with others, and then one day he takes a bunch of guns
and heads to the local pre-school. If we had been able to find a way
to get him to talk to us we might have found out what was going on in
his head and averted a tragedy. And, on an international level,
imagine what the Cold War would have been like if Russia and the
United States shared a language and had the internet. People from
each country would have been conversing with each other on a daily
basis. Tension between the nations would have been greatly lessened
and the governments of both nations would have been held more
accountable by their citizens. People will always go easier on their
government if they feel they need them as protection against the “Evil Empire" across the other side of the world. But when
some of our best friends are “evil ones" the picture
changes. Plus, international communication of this kind
makes national censorship impossible. Finally, most of our
greatest creative endeavours are cooperative projects which require
lots of communication. Even a lone artist gets ideas from others.

We have the image of the brave soldier
who fights for our freedom. This can be one side of the equation when
we are faced with a current threat. He or she may be the medicine
when we are sick. But if we want to make the world safe for freedom,
there is something we all can do, and it also takes tremendous
courage. It has always been fear which has held love in check. We
loved completely before we learned to be afraid. Perhaps the hardest
thing in the world is to stand alone and naked. To be defenceless.
But beneath our armour we are all alone and naked. That is what
unites us. All we need to do is to be that naked self and to say “Hello".