No, I believe what the UK, French governments and intelligence services tell us and despite CIA having other info to say it was planned. Either way I can wait 200 years for French intelligence to declassify it all.

0%

[ 0 ]

Total Votes : 23

Author

Thread

Free World Order

tagged & banned

Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU

How Diana Died: The Conspiracy FilesSun Dec 10, 2006 6:10 pm

COMMENTS: WILL THIS BE ANOTHER ATTEMPT OF GOVERNMENT COMMISSIONED PROPAGANDA AND MIND CONTROL FROM THE BBC???

Seems very likely the government propagandists now tell us crappy news and expect us to believe these lies since the previous ones all fell apart!

WILL LET YOU KNOW.
Now we know for certain that the driver's blood samples were purposely switched with a dead mans blood samples that died from carbon monoxide poisoning they are trying to make us believe he was well over the drink driving limit and that he drank alcohol - even though witnesses say they did not see him drink and his close friends said he barely drank any alcohol ever and was very sensible. Remember this is the same guy that was paid money into his bank account! Driver Henri Paul received £75000

============
How Diana Died: The Conspiracy Files
On the eve of the publication of Lord Stevens' police report into the death of Princess Diana, a special programme investigates allegations that she was murdered by the secret service on the orders of the British establishment.

Nearly 10 years on from the car crash in Paris, which claimed the lives of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and their driver Henri Paul, questions remain.

How Diana Died: The Conspiracy Files talks to the people behind the conspiracy theories, reveals new evidence and explores the continuing controversy over what really happened.

Last edited by Free World Order on Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:43 pm; edited 4 times in total

Free World Order

tagged & banned

Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU

Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:11 pm

Jeweler Was Told To Lie In Princess Diana Case

Maira Oliveira
All Headline News
Thursday, December 7, 2006

A key witness in the inquiry into the death of Britain's Princess Diana recently claimed police threatened him to change his evidence.

Jeweler Alberto Repossi - who claims he sold Diana's lover Dodi Al Fayed an engagement ring the day before the couple were killed in a car crash in Paris on August 31, 1997 - alleges he was put under pressure by investigators to retract the statement he gave to Lord Stevens, who is leading the inquiry.

There is speculation that investigators did not want evidence that Diana and Dodi were to become engaged to be made public, as it would fuel conspiracy theories championed by Dodi's father Mohammed Al Fayed that the princess was murdered as part of a secret plot to prevent her from marrying a Muslim.

Repossi told Britain's Daily Express newspaper, "These are things which I am absolutely certain about. They warned me if anyone lied to Lord Stevens - and anyone could include the prime minister or even the secret service - then he had the power to get people sent to prison.

He added, "They kept repeating the warnings of the risk to my reputation and the bad press coverage I would get. But despite all this, I was not prepared to change what I'd said before because it was the truth."

Repossi's testimony - backed up by receipts and CCTV footage - reveals Dodi and Diana picked a $305,000 emerald and diamond ring from a range of engagement bands called "Did-Moi Oui" which means "Tell Me Yes" at his Monte Carlo jewelry store in August 1997.

Dodi - the son of Harrods owner, Mohammad Al Fayed - asked for the ring to be sent to Repossi's Paris branch so he could collect it on August 30.

Repossi said, "I strongly support any attempt to determine exactly what caused this terrible tragedy. Until now I thought I could play my part by co-operating fully with the

inquiry. But my treatment during the interviews has convinced me that they are not interested in establishing the truth."

He continued, "My real concern is that attempts were certainly made to get me to change

what I knew to be the truth. I believe they were doing this in order to support theories or conclusions they had already arrived at before they saw me. They only seemed interested in trying to show me I was lying."

The investigation is expected to conclude that the crash was an accident due to driver Henri Paul being under the influence of alcohol and driving over the speed limit.

British hearings into the deaths of Princess Diana and her companion Dodi al Fayed will be held in public after a decision that they should be conducted in secret was reversed, judicial authorities said on Thursday.

The original decision of presiding judge Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss had been strongly criticized by Fayed's father Mohamed, owner of the exclusive London store Harrods.

The preliminary hearings, scheduled for next month, are the latest step in efforts to get to the bottom of the death of Diana, ex-wife of British heir to the throne Britain's Prince Charles.

Diana, who was 36, Fayed and their chauffeur Henri Paul died when their Mercedes limousine smashed into a wall in a Paris road tunnel in 1997.

A two-year French inquiry blamed the crash on Paul, saying he was drunk, under the influence of anti-depressants and driving too fast.

The British inquest was opened in January 2004 and then royal coroner Michael Burgess asked police to hold a top-level investigation into the circumstances surrounding the deaths.

He said he wanted John Stevens, the former head of London police, to examine conspiracy theories that the couple were murdered by British spies to cover royal embarrassment about their relationship.

Diana and Charles had two sons, Princes William and Harry, but their marriage ended in divorce.

Stevens is due to unveil the results of his three-year investigation next week.

The Judicial Communications Office said Butler-Sloss originally decided to hold the hearings on January 8 and 9 in private for practical reasons such as the size of a courtroom available.

"She's reconsidered in view of the strong public interest in these particular hearings that they should be held in public," a spokesman said. The proceedings would consider whether a jury should be present for a full inquest and if so, what form it would take.

A spokesman for Mohamed al Fayed, who remains convinced that the couple were murdered by British spies to prevent his son, a Muslim, from marrying Diana, welcomed the decision.

"He doesn't believe that anything should be held behind closed doors. There's no reason for it, nobody has anything to fear from the cold light of day than those who may be guilty," the spokesman told Sky News.

Comment: Lord Stevens is the whitewash specialist the government turns to on every occasion it wants to sweep its criminal actions under the rug. The crash was an accident, the blood samples being swapped was an accident, the ambulance taking over an hour to reach the hospital was an accident, the change of route to Dodi's flat was an accident, police radios and cameras shutting off moments before the crash was an accident, Diana saying she would be killed in a car crash was a coincidental, the laser beam was coincidental, the white Fiat Uno was coincdental, secret service agents swarming the tunnel before the crash was coincidental.

Yes, it was all one big coincidental accident according to Stevens, but the fact remains that 94% of Brits believe it was murder and one more apologetic cover-up from within the very establishment that killed Diana is not going to change that.

------------------------------------------

The American secret service was bugging Princess Diana's telephone conversations without the approval of the British security services on the night she died, according to the most comprehensive report on her death, to be published this week.

Among extraordinary details due to emerge in the report by former Metropolitan police commissioner Lord Stevens is the revelation that the US security service was bugging her calls in the hours before she was killed in a car crash in Paris.

In a move that raises fresh questions over transatlantic agreements on intelligence-sharing, the surveillance arm of the US has admitted listening to her conversations as she stayed at the Ritz hotel, but failed to notify MI6. Stevens is understood to have been assured that the 39 classified documents detailing Diana's final conversations did not reveal anything sinister or contain material that might help explain her death.

Scotland Yard's inquiry, published this Thursday, also throws up further intelligence links with the Princess of Wales on the night she died. The driver of the Mercedes, Henri Paul, was in the pay of the French equivalent of M15. Stevens traced £100,000 he had amassed in 14 French bank accounts though no payments have been linked to Diana's death.

Stevens's conclusion is that Diana, her companion Dodi Fayed, and Paul himself died in an accident caused by Paul driving too fast through the Pont de l'Alma underpass in Paris while under the influence of drink. The car was being pursued by photographers at the time.

Tests have confirmed that Paul was more than three times over the French drink-drive limit and was travelling at 'excessive' speed. The inquiry will quash a number of conspiracy theories that have circulated since 31 August 1997, among them that Diana was pregnant. It also found no evidence that the princess was planning to get engaged to Dodi, son of Mohamed Fayed.

The Harrods tycoon believes that Paul's blood samples were swapped to portray him as a drunk in an elaborate cover-up by the establishment to stop Diana marrying Dodi, a Muslim.

Stevens is expected to concede that while there was a mix-up it was an accident and that the original French post-mortem which found that Paul was three-times over the French drink-drive limit was correct.

He is also expected to discount the role of the white Fiat Uno which struck Diana's car shortly before the crash, even though British police officers have failed to track down the vehicle which left paintwork on the black Mercedes.

The inquiry will support the findings of the original French accident inquiry in criticising the paparazzi as a possible reason for encouraging Paul to speed. The 'bright light' theory - the claim that the driver was deliberately blinded by a beam immediately before the crash - is also dismissed by Stevens.

Officials investigating the tragic death of Diana, Princess of Wales, have reportedly uncovered the identity of the suicide victim whose blood was mixed up with samples taken from her driver Henri Paul.

It is now known that the blood, previously thought to be Paul's and which was used to prove the chauffeur was three times over the legal drink-driving limit, belonged to somebody else.

Forensic pathologist Professor Dominique Lecomte faces an investigation over the mix-up after it emerged in September (06) that she confused the identity numbers of the bodies, reports Contactmusic.

Paul was at the wheel of the Mercedes Benz when it crashed inside a Paris, France tunnel, killing him, Diana and her lover Dodo Fayed. He was originally said to have been heavily intoxicated at the time.

"What is certain is that all the test on Paul's blood were deeply flawed, and that the truth is now slowly emerging.

The French knew who this suicide victim was, and that his alcohol and carbon monoxide readings were used to make it look as though Paul should not have been driving,” an insider was quoted

Last edited by Free World Order on Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:49 pm; edited 1 time in total

Free World Order

tagged & banned

Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU

Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:23 pm

Well the carbon monoxide lie did not work (it was a dead persons sample that killed themself) now lets try to see if the sheeple will fall for this one fake alcohol blood samples!!!

They tried this before though and it failed miserably. So they then said ah, he has carbon monoxide poisoning in his blood. Of course no living man would have been able to have the amounts the sample showed and in the article above see how it was switched samples just as the alcohol one is also.

Some suggest this was done to portray him as drunk in an elaborate cover-up of a secret service plot to murder Diana.

But the DNA tests would appear to prove that the driver's blood samples could not have been switched.

The new evidence has come to light days before the publication of Lord Stevens' report into Diana's death in Paris in 1997, which is expected to conclude it was an accident.

Meanwhile, a poll for the BBC suggests that more than three in 10 people in the UK do not believe it was.

DNA match

A source close to the French authorities told the programme the DNA tests were carried out in France within the past year.

A DNA profile was taken from Mr Paul's blood samples and compared with his parents' DNA. They matched.

Lord Stevens' inquiry team has pledged to investigate the many conspiracy theories that surround the deaths of Diana, 36, her companion Dodi Al Fayed, 42, and Mr Paul, the driver of the Mercedes that crashed in August 1997.

The Alma Tunnel crash investigation was the biggest in French history and was carried out by the country's top police force, the Criminal Brigade. After two years it concluded Diana's death was a tragic accident.

Mr Paul was held to blame for the crash and found to be drunk and driving at excessive speed.

However, conspiracy theories have gripped the public imagination as a result of doubts raised about the French crash investigation.

Sceptics of the official account question why a crucial witness, the driver of a second car involved in the crash, has never been identified and how it took nearly two hours to get Diana to a hospital just four miles away.

'Unanswered questions'

Royal biographer Nicholas Davies tells the programme: "The more we are left with so many unanswered questions, the more we are left saying there is only one answer to this - that she was taken out."

Former royal correspondent Noel Botham claims the Princess sensed danger: "Diana was fearful of her own death for the last few years of her life. Right up to the moment of the accident she believed somebody was out there to get her and she was right."

Mohamed Al Fayed maintains his son Dodi and Diana told him on the night they died of their plans to get married, and also that Diana told him she was pregnant.

He believes this provided the motive for the British Establishment to organise a secret service plot to murder the princess.

Her close friend Rosa Monckton was on holiday with her three weeks before she died.

Ms Monckton maintains that the ring Dodi had bought for Diana was not an engagement ring.

"I know there is a ring... she said it's going very firmly on my right hand. So no, she wasn't contemplating marriage with him."

Ten days before she died Diana visited a London clinic for treatment of pre-menstrual tension.

Checks carried out by her consultant, Dr Lily Hua, confirmed that Diana was not pregnant.

Ms Monckton also tells the programme she knows that "there's no way she could have been pregnant".

Diana 'not pregnant'

Professor Andre Lienhart reviewed the emergency services' response for the French investigation.

In his first interview he tells The Conspiracy Files he saw copies of the post-mortem examination carried out on Diana in England 24 hours after the crash.

"The autopsy," he says, "showed that she was not pregnant.

"I don't think it's possible to stop rumours - what is clear from all the medical staff and paramedics working that night, is that they wanted to save the person in front of them. That is absolutely indisputable."

And Professor Lienhart adds there is one crucial fact people need to know: "What is certain is that she was not wearing a seatbelt and this made things worse.

"We would like to think that if she had been wearing a seatbelt, we'd been able to save her."

This week Lord Stevens will make his judgement on the events of that night. It is widely expected that he will conclude the crash was an accident. The available evidence suggests Mr Paul was drunk at the wheel, with a potent mix of alcohol and drugs in his system, and driving too fast for the road.

The Metropolitan Police inquiry is likely to support the French police's view that the chasing paparazzi were an important influence on the speed of the Mercedes.

Martine Monteil, the head of the French Judicial Police who investigated the crash, tells The Conspiracy Files: "There was a horde of photographers who were following the couple and they were very close to the Mercedes when the accident happened.

"Obviously this causes annoyance and stress. But it is not the only explanation. The driver also lost control of the car, that's obvious."

How Diana Died: The Conspiracy Files will be broadcast on BBC Two on Sunday 10 December at 2100 GMT.

Last edited by Free World Order on Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:58 pm; edited 1 time in total

Free World Order

tagged & banned

Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU

Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:25 pm

The UK government also commissioned this psychological profiling setup by BBC:

Princess Diana WAS pregnant and this was covered up and then leaked so they lied about the tests that were done. Do some research on this.

U.S. Spy Tapes Reveal Diana Was Pregnant -

She even revealed in here own tapes that her life was attempted to be cut short. She said several intelligence officers had shot at her on several occasions. She also talked about a car crash that would look like an accident in her letters to her Butler and of course she got this info from her own contacts in the Intelligence Establishment from her friends. The media response to this was that she was a deluded and paranoid._________________http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org

In response to the shameful report in the Mail On Sunday dated 31st July 2005 claiming that Princess Diana was not pregnant nor was she planning to marry my son, I sent the following quote to the Daily Express:

Richard Kay (Mail On Sunday reporter) and his cronies are the very worst kind of establishment and Royal family arse lickers. Who are these idiots and how can they commit such garbage to paper whilst the investigation is ongoing and no stone is being left unturned? Shame on them for running such sensationalist rubbish - especially when the Mail has itself has run so many stories stating that Diana was pregnant. This article can only have been prompted by the Security Services who are clearly very nervous about the positive findings the investigation is uncovering.

We have been cooperating with Scotland Yard for two years and have given them access to all of the evidence we have accumulated since the tragedy. As will be revealed in due course, the assertions made in the Daily Mail article are entirely untrue. I can say this absolutely categorically because Scotland Yard have shared many of their findings with us as they have proceeded.

I was very close to Diana and I know many things from her that show that this was no accident. One thing that will be shown to be true when the inquest is held is that Diana was pregnant with my son’s child. The lives of these two innocent people and the life of their unborn child were taken from them by evil forces who, as I have said before, are controlled by the Royal Family under the rule of the most wicked of men, Prince Philip.

This newspaper showed that 94% of people believe that Diana and Dodi were murdered - and those people will be proven right in due course. I am a father who lost his son and I will not rest until the truth is told and the people who committed these terrible crimes are brought to justice.

Here is what the Daily Express printed on their front page:

By Padraic Flanagan

INQUIRY WILL PROVE THAT THE PRINCESS WAS EXPECTING A BABY WHEN SHE DIED

Princess Diana was carrying a love child when she was killed in Paris, it was claimed last night.

A senior French lawyer helping the inquiry into the car crash which killed Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed said the investigation would prove she was expecting a child at the time.

The top-level source, who has seen all the official documents in the case, told the Daily Express there was a cover-up on the days following the tragedy in Paris in 1997.

The startling development - almost exactly eight years after she died - has heightened speculation that Diana was preparing to announce her pregnancy when her chauffeur-driven Mercedes crashed.

Weeks before Diana died, she told journalists: "You are going to get a big surprise." The source is convinced she was referring to her unborn child.

Former Metropolitan Police chief Lord Stevens is investigating the claim. His exhaustive inquiry is being seen as a final attempt to establish how Diana met her untimely death. The circumstances surrounding the crash have been shrouded in bitter controversy.

Dodi's father, Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed, has always insisted Diana was killed by British agents to prevent her embarrassing the Royal Family by marrying his son or having a child by him.

That theory received over-whelming backing from Daily Express readers in a recent telephone poll, with 94 per cent convinced her death was not an accident.

Mr Al Fayed said the latest revelations quashed recent claims in a newspaper that Diana, his son and their chauffeur Henri Parul were simply the victims of an avoidable high-speed road crash.

"Such an article can only have been prompted by the security services who are clearly very nervous about the positive findings the investigation is uncovering," he said.

"We have been co-operating with Scotland Yard for two years and have given them access to all the evidence we have accumulated."

Mr Al Fayed went on: "I was very close to Diana and I know many things from her that show this was no accident.

"One thing that will be shown to be true when the inquest is held is that Diana was pregnant with my son's child.

"I am a father who lost his son and will not rest until the truth is told and the people who committed these terrible crimes are brought to justice."

Officials at Prince Charles's office at Clarence House refused to comment. Diana's brother, Earl Spencer, was unavailable last night.

Since the tragedy in the Pont d'Alma underpass, speculation has been rife that Diana and Dodi, 42, were murdered to prevent them marrying. Dodi had already bought an engagement ring.

That theory gathered pace following revelations that a French pathologist embalmed the Princess's body before a proper post mortem examination could be carried out in Britain.

The process meant vital toxicological evidence was destroyed, making it impossible to tell if the Princess was expecting her third child.

Professor Dominique Lecomte examined Diana's body on the night she died. She then embalmed the Princess in an apparent breach of French law but has always refused to explain her actions.

Lawyers for the families of Dodi and Henri Paul want a court to question Lecomte about the embalming. They claim the patologist and Dr Gilbert Pepin, a toxicologist, falsified evidence to the original nquiry into the death of the Princess.

Experts have argued that the decision to embalm Diana's body using formaldehyde would have tainted any samples taken at a subsequent post mortem examination in London. As a result, any positive pregnancy test was likely to be incorrect.

But this fact may also have pesuaded lab scientists to dismiss any genuine sign of pregnancy.

A senior French police officer who insisted the crash was a straight forward accident, claimed last year that he had seen medical papers showing that Diana was pregnant.

By contrast, Dr John Burton, the former royal coroner who spent six years blocking an inquest after arguing it would be a waste of time and money, said he could say for sure that she was not expecting.

The official French inquiry, led by Judge Herve Stephan, ignored the pregnancy issue because it was not considered relevant to the cause of the accident.

After public disquiet and widespread accusations of a cover up, the new royal coroner, Michael Burgess, ordered the probe by Lord Stevens in April 2004. In February last year the underpass was sealed off to enable him to inspect the crash site.

Initial claims that pursuing photographers caused the crash were ruled out by the French inquiry but other allegations persist to support claims of an Establishment murder plot.

New Diana revelations
By Robert Jobson, Royal Correspondent Evening Standard

Princess Diana considered running off with her bodyguard lover Barry Mannakee.

The princess admitted she "fell deeply in love" with the policeman and insisted she was certain he was "bumped off". A top detective has been called in to investigate the claim which appears in tapes Diana recorded for her voice coach. In excerpts to be shown on American TV, Diana said of her marriage to Prince Charles: "I was quite happy to give it all up ... just to go off and live with [Mannakee].

She added: "Can you believe it? And he [Mannakee] kept saying he thought it was a good idea too."

She admitted she "fell deeply in love" and added: "He was the greatest fellow I have ever had. I was only happy when he was around."

She also admitted to her complete devastation when the affair ended - and how she needed to see a clairvoyant to help her cope with Sgt Mannakee's death in a 1987 motorbike crash. "I should never have played with fire," she said. "But I did. And I got burned."

Diana opened her heart about her love for Sgt Mannakee in September 1992, during the first of 20 videos she made with voice coach Peter Settelen.

Now, seven years after her death, they are the most explosive excerpts from the tapes that have been sold to American TV station NBC. She also discussed her unhappy marriage, Prince Charles seeing Camilla Parker

Bowles and her troubled relationship with the Queen.

Of Mannakee, she told Settelen: "I tell you one of the biggest crutches of my life, which I don't find easy to discuss, was when I was 24, 25, I fell deeply in love with somebody who worked in this environment. And he was the greatest fellow I have ever had.

"I was always waiting around trying to see him. Um, I just, you know, wore my heart on my sleeve. I was only happy when he was around.

Asked if he provided the "intimacy you weren't getting" she replied: "Yeah."

Settelen says he believes the relationship was so important to Diana because she "needed somebody who would let her be herself, who would look out for her".

But the relationship was soon discovered after gossip spread through the royal household. "It got so difficult and eventually he had to go," Diana said. "And, um, it was all found out and he was chucked out."

She also revealed the horror of finding her true love was dead - and suggests that Charles was deliberately cruel in breaking the news to her.

She was told while they were traveling to the 1987 Cannes Film Festival together in the back of a limo. "Charles told me that he was killed in a motorbike accident," she recalled.

"And that was the biggest blow of my life, I must say. That was a real killer. Charles thought he knew but he never, never had any proof. And he just jumped it on me like that and I wasn't able to do anything."

Just minutes after hearing the news, she had to put on her public face at the festival ceremony, not allowed to show her pain. "I sat there all day going through this huge high-profile visit to Cannes," she recalled. "Thousands of press. Just devastated.

"Of course it wasn't supposed to mean as much as it did." It was during these sessions that she voiced her concerns that Mannakee had been killed to hide a royal scandal.

Diana murder claim tapes to be broadcast in US
By Patrick Sawer, Evening Standard
26 November 2004

For years Prince Charles and the Queen have been hoping this moment would never arrive - but next week videotapes in which Diana, Princess of Wales, makes a number of embarrassing allegations are being broadcast.

Their content is damning, even if the most extreme claim is scarcely credible.

In the tapes, to be broadcast on America's NBC channel, the Princess is shown saying:

Her bodyguard was murdered for having an affair with her.

She begged the Queen for help over her husband's affair with Camilla Parker Bowles, only to be dismissed with the comment "Charles is hopeless".

Charles met her only 13 times before their wedding.

She was shattered when he replied "Whatever 'in love' means" when asked about their relationship.
The tapes were made by Diana's voice coach Peter Settelen to help her with public speaking between September 1992 and December 1993, one of the most troubled periods of the Princess's life.

Diana's family have fought a lengthy legal battle to prevent the tapes being aired, but last September they finally gave in and told the Met to hand the tapes back to Mr Settelen, who is thought to have sold them for thousands of pounds to NBC.

Now they are to be shown in two hour-long specials, starting on Monday. While there are no plans to screen the tapes in this country, extracts are bound to be used extensively in the media.

That is bound to cause deep embarrassment to the royal family and reopen old wounds about Charles's conduct during his marriage to Diana.

The tapes were recorded by Mr Settelen in Diana's Kensington Palace apartment. He gave them to her to watch in private, but after her death they disappeared. They were found by police officers at ex-butler Paul Burrell's home.

Mr Settelen then claimed ownership of the tapes, sparking a legal wrangle.

In the tapes the Princess says the road death of Sergeant Barry Mannakee, a married royal protection officer with whom she is thought to have had an affair, was "the biggest blow of my life." She says: "It was all found out and he was chucked out. And then he was killed. And I think he was bumped off. But um, there we are. I don't ... we'll never know ... he was the greatest fella I ever had."_________________http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/PoliceState.html
Disclaimer: all my posts are thought crimes and only IMO in the police state we all live in...
http://www.europeantruth.co.uk/index1.html UK is history, USA to RESIST?
http://www.freedom-force.org

Free World Order

tagged & banned

Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 2013
Location: Totalitarian EU

Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:15 pm

Now the 10th anniversary is here with the investigation outcome that will be heard this week, we are being told all conspiracy theories have been exhausted by conspiracists.

17 December 2006 13:05
Diana inquiry: Inside the mind of al-Fayed
Why the official report on the fatal crash will never satisfy the Harrods boss
Published: 17 December 2006

Time stands still in Mohamed al-Fayed's suite of private rooms, carpeted richly pink, on the top floor of Harrods in London. There is champagne and canapés and a troop of journalists, spin doctors, private detectives and lawyers to consume both.

But a photograph on ostentatious display freezes the frame: Diana presents a polo trophy, as Dodi Fayed stands, smiling, behind. For his grieving father it seems it will always be the summer of 1997.

Last week's publication of the official report into the deaths of Diana and Dodi on 31 August of that year was meant to point an accusing finger at Buckingham Palace. Instead it points west, up towards Knightsbridge, up the stairs of one of the most famous shops in the world and into the private suite of Mohamed al-Fayed.

When Lord Stevens delivered his main conclusion on Thursday, he confirmed a finding that had been leaked to several newspapers, including this one.

Diana, the late Princess of Wales, died in a simple road traffic accident. Her driver Henri Paul was driving too fast and had had too much to drink.

It is a verdict that Mr Fayed will never accept. He pledged last week to spend "whatever it is going to cost me - if I lose the last penny in my pocket" to pursue his campaign. But the businessman's contention, that Diana, pregnant with Dodi's child, was killed by MI6 on the orders of Prince Philip to prevent her from marrying his son, has now been forensically examined.

And a close reading of the 832 pages it has taken 10 detectives three years to compile throws some unflattering shafts of light back over the accuser himself.

Mr Fayed cannot accept that Mr Paul was drunk because - it is claimed - he himself approved the fatal last-minute dash from the Paris Ritz, which he owns, his acting head of security at the wheel of an unfamiliar limousine. It is not suggested that Mr Fayed knew his driver was was drunk.

It could be established for certain whether or not this claim is true had Lord Stevens been provided with a communications record kept at the nerve centre that ran Mr Fayed's vast security operation.

But as the report notes on page 677: "Operation Paget does not have the Log of Communications from Mohamed al-Fayed's Security Team Operations Room at Park Lane in which details of the movements of all family members are recorded."

Nowhere is the strange world of Mr Fayed brought more directly into the light than in the testimony of his small army of bodyguards that is co-ordinated from that room.

One of his claims is that the three most closely associated with the events of that night in Paris were turned against him by the intelligence services. Lord Stevens devotes a whole chapter to taking apart these contentions. He quotes extensively from their testimony relating how they came under pressure to sustain Mr Fayed's version of events.

Trevor Rees-Jones, the only survivor of the crash, told detectives how he was put up in a Park Lane apartment after being released from hospital and kept away from his former colleagues.

Mr Rees-Jones "kept seeing" Mr Fayed, something he "did not enjoy", recalls the report. Mr Fayed "went on that they were murdered, that they were killed". His bodyguard, whose memory had been lost as a result of his head injuries, would "just nod and do what [he] could to get out of there". Mr Rees-Jones later resigned.

His colleague Kieran ("Kez") Wingfield told Lord Stevens's detectives that he had been called to see Mr Fayed one day in 1998 when he was on duty in the businessman's estate in Scotland and asked to give a television interview. "I refused and he completely lost it - he was swearing at me. I just did not believe any of the conspiracy theories ... and I refused to go on national television and say something I simply did not believe to be true. I've got my self-respect." Mr Wingfield asked for time to consider his options - and then resigned.

Then there is the testimony of Reuben Murrell, who was installed in Villa Windsor, the Paris residence of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor bought by Mr Fayed, supposedly as a home for Diana, Dodi and the new child.

Mr Murrell says he was told to give a false account of Dodi and Diana's visit to the villa the day before their death to two American journalists. "I was told to say that they were choosing suitable decoration for the villa and also to indicate that that I had overheard them discussing which would be a good room for the new baby and that the grounds would be good for a new baby to play in."

What of Mr Paul himself? Mr Fayed insists he was in the pay of MI6 rather than accept he was an alcoholic who had consumed three times the legal driving limit the night he was summoned to drive the princess.

Lord Stevens could not say for sure whether or not Mr Paul was an informant to the intelligence services. He had €43,000 in his bank account that could not be accounted for from legitimate sources at the time of his death.

An MI6 telegram from the Paris station back to London suggests that, while he was not known to British intelligence, he may have been a contact with the French service. The intelligence officer recorded how the Ritz was "crawling" with French police in November 1997. "Presumably as head of security there, Henri Paul was a contact of DST [French intelligence] and they would have such a capacity again."

Mr Paul and all the other members of Mr Fayed's secretive army operated at the fringes of official agencies - something that has helped to sustain Mr Fayed's conspiracy theories.

He has also been sustained during his long, expensive and so far fruitless quest to gain acceptance for his theories by two key lieutenants. His former head of security, John Macnamara, and his former spokesman Michael Cole were at his side again last week when he called a press conference to respond to Lord Stevens.

The "two old warhorses", as Mr Cole himself termed them, attempted to keep journalists engaged while they waited for Mr Fayed himself, Mr Cole at one point suggesting that Diana had been targeted because of the landmines campaign. When at last he appeared, he was a shuffling figure - the very picture of a wronged man.

"If Dodi and Diana had wed and if they had children, Britain would have had, in effect, an alternative royal family. The attractive, personable Fayeds. Or the charmless German Windsors?"

As one of those present said, it would have been funny - had not it been the occasion of an official report into the death of three people.

Even former adversaries such as Henry Porter, who fought a two-year legal battle against Mr Fayed over a Vanity Fair article, said he was struck by how "diminished" the Egyptian-born businessman appeared. Mr Cole was overheard telling journalists that his former boss had "aged 10 years" in the past few weeks as it became clear that his version of events had not been accepted.

Lord Stevens - whom Mr Fayed called a "mental case" - declined to engage, saying that he was a "grieving father". Mr Fayed himself presents his campaign in these terms: "I am a father who has lost a son and a close friend," he said yesterday.

He suggested that he had been betrayed by Lord Stevens, who had once embraced him and pledged that he would not rest until he had uncovered the truth.

Now it is the turn of Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss to do what she can to help Mr Fayed. The former head of the Family Court has come out of retirement to handle the resumption of the inquests into Dodi and Diana's deaths.

She must decide whether to sit alone or convene a jury made up of members of the Royal Household. She must also rule on how much, if any, of the remaining secret evidence is placed in the public domain.

And most importantly she must rule on whether to call Mr Fayed as a witness where, under oath, he will be called on to give his full account of what happened that night.

Dame Elizabeth is planning to hold hearings on 8 and 9 January in the Royal Courts of Justice. In a coincidence that will appeal to conspiracy theorists, the inquests are being planned for Court 73 - the venue of the Hutton inquiry.

Time stands still in Mohamed al-Fayed's suite of private rooms, carpeted richly pink, on the top floor of Harrods in London. There is champagne and canapés and a troop of journalists, spin doctors, private detectives and lawyers to consume both.

But a photograph on ostentatious display freezes the frame: Diana presents a polo trophy, as Dodi Fayed stands, smiling, behind. For his grieving father it seems it will always be the summer of 1997.

Last week's publication of the official report into the deaths of Diana and Dodi on 31 August of that year was meant to point an accusing finger at Buckingham Palace. Instead it points west, up towards Knightsbridge, up the stairs of one of the most famous shops in the world and into the private suite of Mohamed al-Fayed.

When Lord Stevens delivered his main conclusion on Thursday, he confirmed a finding that had been leaked to several newspapers, including this one.

Diana, the late Princess of Wales, died in a simple road traffic accident. Her driver Henri Paul was driving too fast and had had too much to drink.

It is a verdict that Mr Fayed will never accept. He pledged last week to spend "whatever it is going to cost me - if I lose the last penny in my pocket" to pursue his campaign. But the businessman's contention, that Diana, pregnant with Dodi's child, was killed by MI6 on the orders of Prince Philip to prevent her from marrying his son, has now been forensically examined.

And a close reading of the 832 pages it has taken 10 detectives three years to compile throws some unflattering shafts of light back over the accuser himself.

Mr Fayed cannot accept that Mr Paul was drunk because - it is claimed - he himself approved the fatal last-minute dash from the Paris Ritz, which he owns, his acting head of security at the wheel of an unfamiliar limousine. It is not suggested that Mr Fayed knew his driver was was drunk.

It could be established for certain whether or not this claim is true had Lord Stevens been provided with a communications record kept at the nerve centre that ran Mr Fayed's vast security operation.

But as the report notes on page 677: "Operation Paget does not have the Log of Communications from Mohamed al-Fayed's Security Team Operations Room at Park Lane in which details of the movements of all family members are recorded."

Nowhere is the strange world of Mr Fayed brought more directly into the light than in the testimony of his small army of bodyguards that is co-ordinated from that room.

One of his claims is that the three most closely associated with the events of that night in Paris were turned against him by the intelligence services. Lord Stevens devotes a whole chapter to taking apart these contentions. He quotes extensively from their testimony relating how they came under pressure to sustain Mr Fayed's version of events.

Trevor Rees-Jones, the only survivor of the crash, told detectives how he was put up in a Park Lane apartment after being released from hospital and kept away from his former colleagues.

Mr Rees-Jones "kept seeing" Mr Fayed, something he "did not enjoy", recalls the report. Mr Fayed "went on that they were murdered, that they were killed". His bodyguard, whose memory had been lost as a result of his head injuries, would "just nod and do what [he] could to get out of there". Mr Rees-Jones later resigned.

His colleague Kieran ("Kez") Wingfield told Lord Stevens's detectives that he had been called to see Mr Fayed one day in 1998 when he was on duty in the businessman's estate in Scotland and asked to give a television interview. "I refused and he completely lost it - he was swearing at me. I just did not believe any of the conspiracy theories ... and I refused to go on national television and say something I simply did not believe to be true. I've got my self-respect." Mr Wingfield asked for time to consider his options - and then resigned.

Then there is the testimony of Reuben Murrell, who was installed in Villa Windsor, the Paris residence of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor bought by Mr Fayed, supposedly as a home for Diana, Dodi and the new child.

Mr Murrell says he was told to give a false account of Dodi and Diana's visit to the villa the day before their death to two American journalists. "I was told to say that they were choosing suitable decoration for the villa and also to indicate that that I had overheard them discussing which would be a good room for the new baby and that the grounds would be good for a new baby to play in."

What of Mr Paul himself? Mr Fayed insists he was in the pay of MI6 rather than accept he was an alcoholic who had consumed three times the legal driving limit the night he was summoned to drive the princess.

Lord Stevens could not say for sure whether or not Mr Paul was an informant to the intelligence services. He had €43,000 in his bank account that could not be accounted for from legitimate sources at the time of his death.

An MI6 telegram from the Paris station back to London suggests that, while he was not known to British intelligence, he may have been a contact with the French service. The intelligence officer recorded how the Ritz was "crawling" with French police in November 1997. "Presumably as head of security there, Henri Paul was a contact of DST [French intelligence] and they would have such a capacity again."

Mr Paul and all the other members of Mr Fayed's secretive army operated at the fringes of official agencies - something that has helped to sustain Mr Fayed's conspiracy theories.

He has also been sustained during his long, expensive and so far fruitless quest to gain acceptance for his theories by two key lieutenants. His former head of security, John Macnamara, and his former spokesman Michael Cole were at his side again last week when he called a press conference to respond to Lord Stevens.

The "two old warhorses", as Mr Cole himself termed them, attempted to keep journalists engaged while they waited for Mr Fayed himself, Mr Cole at one point suggesting that Diana had been targeted because of the landmines campaign. When at last he appeared, he was a shuffling figure - the very picture of a wronged man.

"If Dodi and Diana had wed and if they had children, Britain would have had, in effect, an alternative royal family. The attractive, personable Fayeds. Or the charmless German Windsors?"

As one of those present said, it would have been funny - had not it been the occasion of an official report into the death of three people.

Even former adversaries such as Henry Porter, who fought a two-year legal battle against Mr Fayed over a Vanity Fair article, said he was struck by how "diminished" the Egyptian-born businessman appeared. Mr Cole was overheard telling journalists that his former boss had "aged 10 years" in the past few weeks as it became clear that his version of events had not been accepted.

Lord Stevens - whom Mr Fayed called a "mental case" - declined to engage, saying that he was a "grieving father". Mr Fayed himself presents his campaign in these terms: "I am a father who has lost a son and a close friend," he said yesterday.

He suggested that he had been betrayed by Lord Stevens, who had once embraced him and pledged that he would not rest until he had uncovered the truth.

Now it is the turn of Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss to do what she can to help Mr Fayed. The former head of the Family Court has come out of retirement to handle the resumption of the inquests into Dodi and Diana's deaths.

She must decide whether to sit alone or convene a jury made up of members of the Royal Household. She must also rule on how much, if any, of the remaining secret evidence is placed in the public domain.

And most importantly she must rule on whether to call Mr Fayed as a witness where, under oath, he will be called on to give his full account of what happened that night.

Dame Elizabeth is planning to hold hearings on 8 and 9 January in the Royal Courts of Justice. In a coincidence that will appeal to conspiracy theorists, the inquests are being planned for Court 73 - the venue of the Hutton inquiry.

Princess Diana died of a New World Order Nazi elite death terror plot; this is even obvious to mind numbed sleepwalking pajama people.

What can the NWO establishment do for you today?

Heart attack?

Car Crash?

Suicide?

Their top 3 favourite causes of death for a covered up murder! This has happened to so many people globally over the decades alone it is almost impossible to count how many they have done it to.

TIME TO COME UP WITH SOME NEW ONES NAZI ELITE ESTABLISHMENT - WE KNOW MOST OF YOUR GAMES BY NOW AND YOU CAN NEVER SILENCE ANY OF US! Not even with your fabricated terror-war on the people.

You thought you could use Stevens to brainwash us all into thinking there were how many accidents? You at the establishment are the conspiracy theorists that are clinically insane! Now almost every citizen in the UK knows you did it, thank you for your so well formed conclusive lies with this investigation and all your unprofessional coverups, also the French helped by not investigating properly on the day she died!