Hi,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:13:03PM +0100, Sascha Luck wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:10PM +0200, Turchanyi Geza wrote:
>> >Good to hear that the working group affected is supporting the proposal.
> >Perhaps this is the most important.
>> What is the current status of organisations wrt the PDP? I remember a
> shitstorm about that in a different context (2007-01?).
> IIRC the outcome was that organisations don't get a say except through
> their individual members?
Technically, only individials speak up regarding policy developments.
Nevertheless, for policy proposals involving other RIPE working groups
(be it DNS for "addresses for anycasting" or EIX for this one), it's
certainly welcome if the underlying questions are discussed in the respective
working group as well, and members from there come here to state their
opinion based on that discussion - especially given that these other
working groups might have a better understanding of the technical
issues involved.
I think for IXPs, we can do quite well :-) - but for DNS related proposals,
we had a few statements here where it was helpful to be able to draw on
the wisdom of the DNS WG...
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

The RIPE NCC uses cookies. Some of these cookies may have been set already. More information about our cookies can be found in our privacypolicy. You can accept our cookies either by clicking here or by continuing to use the site.