No. 07-0385/NA.U.S. v. Kenneth E.
HARRIS.CCA
200401897.On consideration of the petition for grant of
review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of
Criminal
Appeals and the entire record, including the file of the Administrative
Law
Division of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy, submitted under
seal by
Appellee to this Court on October 4, 2007, we conclude that the Court
of
Criminal Appeals abused its discretion in deciding Appellant’s Motion
for Panel
and En Banc Reconsideration and Appellant’s Panel and En Banc Motion to
Recuse
Senior Judge E. E. Geiser, and Judges J. W. Rolph and E. D. Mitchell
from
Appellant’s Case and to Rescind the Panel Two Opinion Issued in
Appellant’s
Case, without first considering the file of the Administrative Law
Division.Accordingly, it is ordered
that said petition is hereby
granted as to assigned issue I:

WHETHER A JUDGE ON THE
NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS SHOULD HAVE BEEN RECUSED
FROM
ACTING ON A CASE IN WHICH HE HAD PREVIOUS OFFICIAL INVOLVEMENT AND
KNOWLEDGE OF
SALIENT FACTS OUTSIDE THE RECORD OF TRIAL.

The case is
returned to the Judge Advocate General
of the Navy for remand to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of
Criminal
Appeals to reconsider Appellant’s Motion for Panel and En Banc
Reconsideration
and Appellant’s Panel and En Banc Motion to Recuse Senior Judge E. E.
Geiser,
and Judges J. W. Rolph and E. D. Mitchell from Appellant’s Case, in
light of
the entire file of the Administrative Law Division of the Judge
Advocate
General of the Navy that is now attached to the record.This reconsideration will be before judges
who have not previously participated in this case.Thereafter, Article 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867
(2000), shall apply.This is without
prejudice to raising the other issues assigned in the instant petition
for
grant of review. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this
date.]

No.
07-0482/MC.U.S. v. Matthew K.
TRAVIS.CCA 200600519.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
brief granted, up to and including
January 10, 2008, and absent
extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be
granted in
this case.

No.
08-0057/NA.U.S. v. Clarence R.
LACY.CCA 200600273.Appellant's
motion to attach an appendix to
the petition for grant of review granted.

No.
08-0162/AR.U.S. v. Alonzo J.
BLUNT.CCA 20061179.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 28,
2008.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-059

Thursday,
December 27, 2007

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No.
08-0225/AR.U.S. v. Eduardo
LIRIANO.CCA 20061018.

No.
08-0226/AR.U.S. v. Friday O.
AYENI.CCA 20030328.

No.
08-0227/MC.U.S. v. Derrick J.
CARTER.CCA 200602474.

UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-058

Wednesday,
December 26, 2007

CERTIFICATES FOR
REVIEW FILED

No. 08-5005/AF.U.S. v. James L.
MACKIE.CCA
S31090.The
Judge
Advocate General of the Air Force requests that action be taken with
respect to
the following issues:

WHETHER THE AIR
FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE
CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE
ABUSED
HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.

WHETHER
THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY
JUDGE
ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT’S REQUEST FOR A SANITY
BOARD
FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY AN
INQUIRY
PURSUANT TO R.C.M. 706.

No. 08-0108/AR.U.S. v. Jordan
S. MOORE.CCA 20060979.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 22,
2008.

No. 08-0127/AR.U.S. v. Samuel
P. RICHIE.CCA 20060380.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 22,
2008.

No. 08-0141/AF.U.S. v. Daniel
J. WING.CCA 36756.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 25,
2008.

No. 08-0145/AR.U.S. v. Anthony
R. LUCERO.CCA 20020869.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 22,
2008.

No. 08-0158/AR.U.S. v. Mark
R. CONLIFFE.CCA 20040721.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 22, 2008 .

No. 08-0161/AR.U.S. v. Joseph
M. RODRIGUEZ.CCA 20051439.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 22,
2008.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-057

Friday,
December 21, 2007

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 08-5001/MC.U.S. v.
Michael A. WILD.CCA 200700108.On
November 21, 2007, the United States filed a motion
for
enlargement of time in which to file a certificate of review in the
above-captioned case.The Court granted
that motion to December 21, 2007 (Daily Journal, December 3, 2007).On December 20, 2007, the United States filed a notice
of intent
not to file a certificate of review.In
view of this notice, it is ordered
that the above-captioned case is hereby removed from the Court’s docket.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No.
07-0850/AF.U.S. v. Alexander F.
FIOREY.CCA 36319.

No.
07-0880/AR.U.S. v. James E.
POSTELL.CCA 20060561.

No.
08-0008/AR.U.S. v. Jared R.
CHAMBERLIN.CCA 20060983.

No.
08-0058/AR.U.S. v. Garrett J.
GOLDEN.CCA 20061168.

No.
08-0067/AF.U.S. v. Matthew R.
HORNYAK.CCA 36920.

No.
08-0080/AR.U.S. v. Joshua R.
CLAUS.CCA 20051171.

No.
08-0098/AR.U.S. v. Derrick S.
GREFF.CCA 20070254.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No.
08-0218/AF.U.S. v. Kermit E.
MITCHELL.CCA 36310.

No.
08-0219/AF.U.S. v. Derek J.
GRESKA.CCA S30987.

No.
08-0220/AF.U.S. v. Antonio M.
JACKSON.CCA S31195.

UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-056

Thursday,
December 20, 2007

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

No. 07-0840/AF.U.S. v. Naomi LANE.CCA S30930.On
consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of
the United
States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, we note that in affirming
the
sentence, that court stated that the sentence included a “forfeiture of
$832.00
pay per month for 3 months,” when in fact the sentence included a
forfeiture of
$823.00 pay per month for 3 months.Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is
hereby granted and that the decision of the United States Air Force
Court of
Criminal Appeals is affirmed as to findings and to only so much of the
sentence
as provides for reduction to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of $823.00 pay
per month
for 3 months, confinement for 3 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
[See also
ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

No. 07-0850/AF.U.S. v.
Alexander F. FIOREY.CCA
36319.Appellee's motion to
submit documents is denied, as said documents are already included in
the
record of trial.

No. 07-0852/NA.U.S. v.
Stephen L. OBRIEN.CCA 8301839.Appellee's
motion to extend time to file an
answer to the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to
January
14, 2008.

No. 08-0116/AF.U.S. v. Troy J.
FRANKS.CCA 36541.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 18,
2008.

No. 08-0159/NA.U.S. v. Joseph
B. GONZALES.CCA 8702946.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to February 4,
2008.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-055

Wednesday,
December 19, 2007

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No.
07-0496/NA.U.S. v. Justin W.
DEANS.CCA 200400791.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No.
08-0215/NA.U.S. v. Tyrice L.
HAYES.CCA 200600910.

No.
08-0216/NA.U.S. v. Michael E.
TYMOWCZAK.CCA 200700365.

UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-054

Tuesday, December
18, 2007

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No. 07-0628/AF.U.S. v. Rinney
J. FUJIWARA.CCA 36124.

No. 07-0746/AF.U.S. v.
Courtney D. L. CLAYBORN.CCA
36432.

No. 07-0876/AF.U.S. v. Gary
M. COOPER, Jr.CCA 36521.

No. 08-0021/AR.U.S. v. Gene
K. BOSLEY.CCA 20060379.

No. 08-0037/AR.U.S. v. Jason
P. COURTEMANCHE.CCA 20061318.

No. 08-0059/AR.U.S. v. Young
H. KIM.CCA 20061316.

No. 08-0081/AR.U.S. v. Andre
JOHNSON.CCA 20061352.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No. 08-0212/NA.U.S. v. David
A. ACOSTA.CCA 200700375.

No. 08-0213/NA.U.S. v.
Matthew STEVENS.CCA 200401069.

No. 08-0214/NA.U.S. v. Elgin F. MARTINEZ.CCA 200700046.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No. 07-0503/MC.U.S. v. Daqric
B. MOOREFIELD.CCA 200600162.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
brief granted, upto and
including December 31, 2007,
and absent extraordinary
circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

No. 07-0701/CG.U.S. v. Carl
T. BRIDGES.CCA 1233.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
brief granted, but only up to and
including January 3, 2008, and
absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will
be
granted in this case.

No. 08-0040/NA.U.S. v.
Rayfield VELAZQUEZ.CCA
200602421.Appellant's second
motion to extend time to
file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted, up to and including December 31, 2007,
and absent extraordinary
circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

No. 08-0045/NA.U.S. v. David
L. SAVAGE.CCA 200500494.Appellant's
second motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the
petition for grant of review granted, up
to and including January 3, 2008, and
absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will
be
granted in this case.

No. 08-0077/AR.U.S. v. Adrian
CHEE.CCA 20030294.Appellant's
motion out of time to extend time
to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted up
to and
including January 14, 2008.

No. 08-0095/MC.U.S. v.
Gabrhea CAUDILL.CCA 200601217.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to December 21,
2007.

No. 08-0097/AR.U.S. v. Paul
B. BAUERMEISTER.CCA 20060207.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 16,
2008.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-053

Monday,
December 17, 2007

APPEALS-SUMMARY
DISPOSITIONS

No. 07-0253/NA.U.S. v. John A.
HALSEMA.CCA 2000137.On consideration
of the petition for grant of review
of the decision by the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of
Criminal
Appeals, said petition is hereby granted, and the case is remanded to
the Court
of Criminal Appeals for consideration of assigned issue II.Following the conclusion of this matter, the
record will be returned directly to this Court for further proceedings.
[See
also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

No. 07-0774/AR.U.S. v. David
C. LANING.CCA 20051484.On
consideration of Appellant’s petition for
grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of
Criminal
Appeals, it is ordered that within
30 days of the date of this order, appellate defense counsel will file
a brief
with this Court on the issue raised by Appellant pursuant to United
States
v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), concerning the military
judge’s
denial of the defense’s request for judicial notice of Dep’t of the
Army, Reg.
27-10, Legal Services, Military Justice chap. 24 (November 16, 2005),
regarding
sexual offender registration.Appellee’s
answer shall be filed within 30 days of the filing of Appellant’s
brief, and a
reply may be filed within 10 days of Appellee’s answer.

No. 07-0813/NA.U.S. v.
Richard S. ROWE.CCA 200600184.On
consideration of the petition for grant of
review of the decision by the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of
Criminal
Appeals, it is ordered that within 30 days of the date of this order,
Appellee
will file an answer to assigned issues I and II.A
reply may be filed within 10 days of Appellee’s
answer.

No. 07-0817/NA.U.S. v.
Maurice O. MILLER.CCA 200401906.On
consideration of the petition for grant of
review of the decision by the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of
Criminal
Appeals, it is ordered that within 30 days of the date of this order,
Appellee
will file an answer to assigned issues I and II.A
reply may be filed within 10 days of
Appellee’s answer.

UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-052

Friday,
December 14, 2007

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

No. 07-0516/AR.U.S. v. Andrew M.
HUMISTON.CCA
20030713.On consideration of the petition for grant of
review of the decision of the United States Army
Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said
petition is hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army
Court of
Criminal Appeals is affirmed.[See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR
REVIEW this
date.]

No. 07-0762/MC.U.S. v. Larry A.
FRAMNESS.CCA
200500152.On consideration of the petition for grant of
review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of
Criminal
Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted, and the
decision
of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is
affirmed.[See
also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

WHETHER, IN LIGHT
OF THIS
COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. ZACHARY, 63 M.J. 438
(C.A.A.F.2006),
THE CCA ERRED IN AFFIRMING APPELLANT'S GUILTY PLEA TO CONSENSUAL SODOMY
WITH A
PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 16 WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRONEOUSLY INFORMED
APPELLANT THAT A MISTAKE OF FACT DEFENSE AS TO AGE CATEGORICALLY DID
NOT APPLY
TO THE SODOMY CHARGE.

WHETHER
THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A FINDING OF GUILT FOR
TRANSPORTING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE WHEN NO EVIDENCE
EXISTS
THAT APPELLANT UPLOADED CHILD PORNOGRAPHY FROM HIS COMPUTER TO THE
INTERNET
FILE-SHARING PROGRAM "KAZAA."

WHETHER THE ARMY
COURT ERRED
IN AFFIRMING THE FINDING OF GUILTY FOR SPECIFICATION 1 OF CHARGE I WHEN
THE COURT
AFFIRMED UNDER A DIFFERENT THEORY OF LIABILITY THAN WAS PROFFERED TO
THE
MILITARY PANEL, IN CONTRAVENTION OF CHIARELLA v. UNITED STATES,
445 U.S.
222 (1980).

WHETHER THE
MILITARY JUDGE
FAILED TO PROPERLY INSTRUCT THE PANEL ON THE ELEMENTS FOR SPECIFICATION
1 OF
CHARGE I, BY: (1) OMITTING THE CHARGED LANGUAGE "CAUSE TO BE
TRANSPORTED"
FROM THE ORAL AND WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS; (2) FAILING TO INSTRUCT ON A
POSSIBLE
GOVERNMENT ALTERNATE THEORY OF LIABILITY UNDER ARTICLE 77, UCMJ; AND
(3)
FAILING TO PROPERLY INSTRUCT ON THE TERM "UPLOADING' WHEN THE COMPUTER
EXPERTS AT TRIAL PROVIDED TWO VARYING DEFINITIONS.

No. 07-0346/AR.U.S. v. Ahmed
M. ELFAYOUMI.CCA 20010415.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
brief granted, but only up to and
including December 28, 2007, and
absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will
be
granted in this case.

No. 08-0085/AR.U.S. v. Jason
L. PRUDE.CCA 20050417.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 14,
2008.

No. 08-0096/AR.U.S. v. Karl
E. KING.CCA 20060648.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 14,
2008.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-051

Thursday,
December 13, 2007

CERTIFICATES FOR
REVIEW FILED

No. 08-5004/AR.U.S. v. Juan R.
GUTIERREZ.CCA 20040596.The Judge Advocate General of the Army
requests that action be taken with respect to the following issue:

WHETHER
THE UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN HOLDING THAT
THE
TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL PROVIDED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
BECAUSE HE
WAIVED AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE INSTRUCTION.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-050

Wednesday,
December 12, 2007

HEARINGS

No.
07-0221/MC.U.S. v. Joseph M.
REYNOSO.CCA 200401465.

No.
07-0495/MC.U.S. v. Amador NIETO,
Jr.CCA 200600977.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW DENIED

No.
07-0861/AF.U.S. v. Ginger A.
ALLEN.CCA S31105.

No.
07-0886/AF.U.S. v. Alex BAKCSI.CCA S30923.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No.
08-0194/AR.U.S. v. Joseph C.
GATTMAN.CCA 20070223.

No.
08-0195/AR.U.S. v. John D.
PARRISH.CCA 20070279.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-049

Tuesday,
December 11, 2007

HEARINGS

No.
07-0436/MC.U.S. v. Jose C.
MIERGRIMADO.CCA 200501128.

No.
07-0225/MC.U.S. v. Michael E.
MITCHELL.CCA 200501185.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No.
08-0192/AR.U.S. v. David DUPONT
III.CCA 20070685.

No.
08-0193/AR.U.S. v. Joe J. PARKS
III.CCA 20070630.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No.
07-0647/AR.U.S. v. Robert D.
MAYNARD.CCA 20060121.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
brief granted, but only up to and
including December 21, 2007, and
absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will
be
granted in this case.

No.
07-0787/MC.U.S. v. Justin A.
INABINETTE.CCA 200602228.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
brief granted, but only up to and
including December 21, 2007, and
absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will
be
granted in this case.

No.
07-0900/MC.U.S. v. Carlos J.
RODRIGUEZ.CCA 9900997.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 4,
2008.

No.
08-0020/AR.U.S. v. Frank M.
PACHECO.CCA 20041261.Appellant's
second motion to extend time to file a
supplement to the
petition for grant of review granted, up
to and including December 21, 2007, and absent
extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time
will be granted in this case.

No.
08-0103/MC.U.S. v. Akyme T.
ROBINSON.CCA 200600974.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 16,
2008.

No.
08-0104/NA.U.S. v. Arnoldo
ALBIAR.CCA 200602375.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 16,
2008.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-048

Monday,
December 10, 2007

HEARINGS

No.
07-5003/AF.U.S. v. Demond WEBB.CCA 2007-01.

No.
07-0597/AF.U.S. v. Manuela Del Carmen Scott.CCA 36514.

APPEALS - SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

No.
06-0001/AR.U.S. v. David L.
ECKARD.CCA 20010870.On consideration
of the petition for grant of review
of the decision of the United States Army Court of
Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is
hereby granted, and the decision of the United States Army Court of
Criminal
Appeals is affirmed.[See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this
date.]

No.
07-0870.U.S. v. Charles S.
ROACH.CCA S31143.Notice
is hereby given that the record was returned to the Clerk’s office on
the 10th
day of December, 2007, in accordance with the earlier decision of this
Court, (Daily Journal, November 21,
2007) and has been referred to the Court for further consideration.

___________________

* Third
petition filed in this case.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-047

Friday,
December 7, 2007

CERTIFICATES FOR
REVIEW FILED

No. 08-5003/AF.U.S. v. Bennie C.
MELSON.CCA 36523.The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force
requests that action be taken with respect to the following issues:

Notice is hereby
given that a petition for
extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis was
filed
under Rule 27(a) on October 29, 2007, and placed on the docket this 7th
day of
December, 2007.On consideration
thereof, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No.
07-0379/NA.U.S. v. David A.
CZACHOROWSKI.CCA 200400735.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file
brief granted, but only up to and
including December 20, 2007, and
absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will
be
granted in this case.

No.
07-0527/MC.U.S. v. Joey M.
GALLAGHER.CCA 200400151.Appellee's
motion out of time to extend time
to file an answer to Appellant's brief granted, up to
and including December 10, 2007, and absent
extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time
will be granted in this case.

No.
07-0725/MC.U.S. v. Jonathan E.
LEE.CCA 200600543.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
brief granted, but only up to and
including January 4, 2008, and
absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will
be
granted in this case.

No.
08-02.In the Matter of William Franklin PARTRIDGE,
III.It appearing that
the above-named attorney is a
member of the Bar of this Court, that on July
18, 2007, he was suspended from the practice of law by the
Supreme Court
of South Carolina, that on October 2,
2007 he
was suspended from the practice of law by the United States Court of
Appeals
for the Fourth Circuit, that on October 29,
2007, pursuant to Rule 15(b), Rules of Practice and Procedure,
United
States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, said attorney was
suspended from
the practice of law before the Court and was directed to show cause why
he
should not be disbarred, and considering the matters submitted by the
above-named attorney on November 29,
2007, in
response to the show cause order, it is ordered that William Franklin
Partridge, III, is suspended from the practice of law before this Court
until
such time as he is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of
South
Carolina and in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit, and,
upon proof of reinstatement, he petitions this Court for reinstatement
to the
Bar of the Court.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-045

Wednesday,
December 5, 2007

HEARINGS

No.
07-0229/NA.U.S. v. Laprie D.
TOWNSEND.CCA 200501197.

No.
07-0386/CG.U.S. v. Jesse C.
HUNTER.CCA 1232.

PETITIONS FOR GRANT OF REVIEW FILED

No.
08-0169/MC.U.S. v. Byron M.
LEWIS.CCA 200600045.

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET - FILINGS

Misc. No.
08-8004/NA.Charles D. MYERS, Appellant v. Marie Danyluk,
Major, U.S. Marine Corps,
Appellee.CCA
200700885.Notice is hereby given
that a writ-appeal petition for review of the decision of the United
States
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals on application for
extraordinary
relief was filed under Rule 27(b) on this date.

INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS

No.
07-0555/AR.U.S. v. Daniel ORTIZ.CCA 20040672.On
consideration of Appellant’s motion to reschedule oral argument, it is
ordered
that said motion is hereby granted, and that the Hearing Notice issued
November
19, 2007, is hereby revised in that the above-entitled
action will be called for hearing at 9:00 a.m. on the 6th day of
February, 2008.Each side will be allotted 20 minutes to present oral argument.

UNITED
STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

DAILY
JOURNAL

No.
08-044

Tuesday,
December 4, 2007

HEARINGS

No.
07-0199/AR.U.S.
v. Joshua P. NAVRESTAD.CCA 20030335.

No.
07-0407/AR.U.S.
v. Michael D. GLENN.CCA 20051482.

APPEALS-SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

No. 04-0313/AF.U.S. v. George E.
ROLLINS.CCA 34515.On
consideration of the petition for grant of review
of the decision of the United States Air Force
Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said
petition is hereby granted, and that the decision of the United States
Air
Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

No. 06-0918/MC.U.S. v. Raymon
F. THOMAS.CCA 200401149.Appellee's
motion for leave to file an answer
out of time granted.

No. 07-0527/MC.U.S. v. Joey
M. GALLAGHER.CCA 200400151.Appellee's
motion to deny Appellant's joint
appendix granted.Appellant will file a
Joint Appendix in compliance with Rule 24(f)(4)
on or
before December 10, 2007.

No. 07-0639/MC.U.S. v. David
M. BROOKS.CCA 200501266.Appellee's
motion to extend time to file an
answer to Appellant’s brief granted, up
to and including December 17, 2007, and absent
extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time
will be granted in this case.

No. 08-0006/AR.U.S. v. Keith
S. CAMPBELL.CCA 20020190.Appellant's
second motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the
petition for grant of review granted, but
only up to and including December 17, 2007, and
absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time
will be granted in this case.

No. 08-5001/MC.U.S. v.
Michael A. WILD.CCA 200700108.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file a
certificate of review granted to December 21, 2007.

No. 08-6001/NA.U.S. v. Scott
J. RATLIFF.CCA 200700512.Appellant's
motion for stay of proceedings
granted; the remanded proceedings of Appellant’s court-martial are
hereby
stayed pending further order of the Court.

No. 98-0497/NA.U.S. v.
Charles W. DAVIS.CCA 9600585.Appellant's
motion to extend time to file the
supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to December 28,
2007.