This crap comes off very childish. Make your game and keep your mouth shut. If your game is better, it'll show. No need to make dumb comments like a 13 year old.

"Derp are gamez iz bettuh"

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawk777th

Let your game do the talking! I am no COD fan but this type of promoting is like a 5 year old saying "my dad can beat up your dad"!

Quoting you fellas as an example, but saying this to all the like-opinioned people in this thread:

Every damn time the press asks EA about BF3, they bring up CoD. It's only natural to see the two titles compared in every article. From the looks of the game so far, it does seem to be "flat out superior," so who's to blame them for putting it the way it is?
I see no reason to judge this harshly over the answer to a question that every reporter puts on their 'to ask' list. If I was asked the same question that many god damn times, I'd sum it up exactly the same way they did in this article. "It's better, k? Let's move on."

i didnt see any trash talk. The guy was simply stating the painfully obvious.

There is nothing wrong with using COD as publicity, If i make a superior product, i want everyone to know that. I'm not gonna sit there and watch people buy a piece of crap. Im gonna atleast them let them make that decision after they know about my badass product first.

However... They don't seem to realize people play CoD more often than BF games because CoD is way smaller maps, no stupid copters, and way faster paced. And they will NEVER take CoD's fan base.

My CoD ratio: 1.95(~3.0 since I started being a lamer). My BF:BC2 ratio: ~1.0.
^^ what makes me and many others not want to play the BF series.

1) assuming that BF3 has a squad deathmatch mode like BC2 you can have that fast paced action on pretty small maps

2) doesn't having a smaller K/D just mean that you are not as good in BC2 as you are in CoD? Seems like you are an average player in BC2 and above average in CoD. And what does that have to do with anything?

1) assuming that BF3 has a squad deathmatch mode like BC2 you can have that fast paced action on pretty small maps

2) doesn't having a smaller K/D just mean that you are not as good in BC2 as you are in CoD? Seems like you are an average player in BC2 and above average in CoD. And what does that have to do with anything?

I've played both series (BF and CoD), and I feel that they are both very good at what they do in the fps genre. I really enjoyed a lot of the titles from both series and they've matured over the many years since their series have started.

IF I had to choose though, I'd say the BF series, but that's because I see a lot more of "tactical atmosphere" than the CoD series. Also love the use of vehicles (tanks and helicopters) in the BF series. Of course, that's my opinion