If you believe that, it's cool for you. I bet lots of nationalists subjectively believe that sub-group x or y is better than the rest, but we can't let that get in the way of our unity.
Differences among White groups are stupendously minimal compared to the differences between Whites and everyone else. So it's certainly not relevant to discuss which White group is cooler and it will cause conflict among us.
We can't afford such divisions, we must unite.
Should one have a personal preference for a certain group or nation, be it theirs or not, it's ought to be a personal view, not a political one.

"Blood is thicker than water" at the end of the day tribalism is the most powerful political force. I see nationalism working when there is a majority of one tribe or hybrid eg Anglo Saxon per nation. But I don't see all the white tribes uniting, they are too diverse. Nationalism is also the opposite of unity like the USSR for example. Anything united is of a far left persuasion eg USA, UK, UN. So if a Nordic raves on "we are the best white race blue eyed and tall the masters of the world blah blah blah" he is being a pefect nationalist. If he says "well we white races are all the same lets unite" he is being a commie.

"Blood is thicker than water" at the end of the day tribalism is the most powerful political force. I see nationalism working when there is a majority of one tribe or hybrid eg Anglo Saxon per nation. But I don't see all the white tribes uniting, they are too diverse. Nationalism is also the opposite of unity like the USSR for example. Anything united is of a far left persuasion eg USA, UK, UN. So if a Nordic raves on "we are the best white race blue eyed and tall the masters of the world blah blah blah" he is being a pefect nationalist. If he says "well we white races are all the same lets unite" he is being a commie.

Nordid - is a racial type of the caucasian race (europid branch), elements can be found in all Europe but they are much prevalent in the north-western countries. There are several sub-types of nordids, check the link beneath to see the "nordish gallery".

The general Nordid type probably evolved through the blending of gracilized northern European Cro-Magnoids (robust broad-faced Upper Paleolithic types) with various types, including tall leptomorphs associated with the Battle-Axe and Boat-Axe peoples, who entered Europe from the Eurasian steppes (carrying the Corded type with them), penetrating the various Nordid-formative territories in several consecutive waves.

The resulting blends were subsequently stabilized, and the resultant types further specialized, to yield the present Nordid varieties. The ancestral Corded type (named after its association with the Corded Ware culture), with its high vault and long head, was skeletally "nordiform" (approaching a Nordid), or perhaps Mediterranid (of a larger, more robust variety).

It should be duly noted that the question of Nordid origin is a much debated subject, and the foregoing account (which reflects the views of the SNPA) should not be embraced without criticism: it is merely one of several possible explanations.

Carleton Coon, and others with him, suggested that the Nordid was essentially a depigmented Mediterranid, derived from the combination of Corded and "Danubian" strains, and thus not immediately affiliated with the northern European Upper Paleolithic survivals. However, there can be no doubt as to the partial affiliation of the Nordid types to the larger-framed, broader-faced Cro-Magnids of present-day northern Europe (the Dalo-Falid and Brünn types).

The fact that Cro-Magnoids have been subject to gracilization in a Nordoid direction is witnessed by the existence of Paleolithic pre-Corded intermediate Cro-Magnoid-Nordoid skulls in the Scandinavian region (K.E. Schreiner, Crania Norvegica II, 1946). The Corded type seems responsible for the relative high-headedness of the Nordid types, as compared to adjacent Cro-Magnid varieties.

Nordids are in a sense a northern equivalent of the southern Mediterranid leptomorphs, existing in a general dichotomy with broader-featured Europid Cro-Magnoids. This duality may be a reflection a general distributional trend, recalling the dichotomy between the Cro-Magnoid and Capellid/Aurignacid varieties of Paleolithic Europe.

Sometimes the concepts of nordid and nordic get mixed, some examples to clarify:

For example this swedish player is both nordic (native of a Nordic country, Scandinavian) and nordid (his phenotype classifies him as hallstatt nordid)

This portuguese family is nordid but not nordic (they are latins)

Aryan - a very complex term, as i understand it is not only a linguistic definition (indo-european languages) but also a racial one, wich is not necessarily compatible with the WN definition of "white":

Let's see. Being pure Aryan was determined by one's grandparents. I have two grandparents who qualified for an Ariernachweis or, in English, an Aryan certificate. I have another grandfather who was born in Central Switzerland and who also would have qualified. That's 3 out of 4 so I too would quaify if there was still such a doucument.

If I would have qualified for the Großer Ariernachweis or Greater Aryan Certificate is a bit trickier. The line of my paternal grandmother has been in the US since the 17th century and while they were mostly Germans, there were also some English and Irish brides that married into the family. That makes things rather borderline.

Unfortunately, the final answer is something I will never know, unless.........

__________________

Officium meum faciam XIV/LXXXVIII

We have only one task, to stand firm and to carry on the racial struggle without mercy.

Heinrich Himmler

Love is giving someone the power to destroy you ... but trusting them not to.

Well some of the white races are so different from each other, their only common ground is their pale skin. Even having blue eyes and blond hair and pale skin is not enough. For example there is at least one race with baby blue eyes and very fair skin with incredibly soft effiminate features (both girls AND boys alike) and very slender small body. I don't know what they are... some kind of snow elf. So is a big tall hairy muscular hard featured Viking the same as these? NO WAY! He would not want to treat these little gay creatures as his "equals" or unite with them, would you?

Well some of the white races are so different from each other, their only common ground is their pale skin. Even having blue eyes and blond hair and pale skin is not enough. For example there is at least one race with baby blue eyes and very fair skin with incredibly soft effiminate features (both girls AND boys alike) and very slender small body. I don't know what they are... some kind of snow elf. So is a big tall hairy muscular hard featured Viking the same as these? NO WAY! He would not want to treat these little gay creatures as his "equals" or unite with them, would you?

Isn't it obvious? Because they're so pretty and nordic looking and even though their best claims to fame through history are Vikings, dynamite, and cheaply made furniture, that's only because us evil swarthy I-talians and other southern Europeans stole their birthright because we all know Greece, Rome, and Egypt, oh and Sumeria too, were all nordic kingdoms and only through massive race mixing did they fall and become the ugly dumb swarthy Mediterraneans.

Note I'm kidding, please.

It's funny because 99% of the attacks on other whites come from nordicists...

Like the author of the ridiculous book "March of the Titans" Mr. Arthur Kemp