Well i know by the anthropology scientific standards that semitic is not a race and Jews are included in the caucasian or caucasoid race but usually their racial standards are very low or inexistent and they prefer integration instead of segregation.

The majority of those anthropologists and DNA studies are not racially aware and are against "anti-semitism" and say that race is a social construction i always look to what they write with that perspective in mind.

Jews are bit more mixed than other semites because they are immigrants mostly in europe but because semites are a different race it is fairly easy to detect the Jews by their phenotype and DNA tests.

Some are so mixed that is not so easy to detect them but they are not racially speaking very semitic anymore.

Jews are not the only semites you can find many semitic looking people in all the countries where J is prevalent in the middle east, near east and caucasus and in south east europe.

An ethnic group can be considered a race or sub-race if there are common racial patterns among the members of that ethnic group at least that is my opinion wich is shared by other WN's and in NS germany Jews were considered a race.

It is true that there are different kinds of Jews, and semites are an heteregoneous group.

Like it is true that there are different kinds of Europeans and whites are an heterogeneous group.

Does that mean that there is no white race like there is no semitic race?

Middle easterns markers of neolithic origin

J2 of eastern european farmers
J1 of Armenian origin (Armeniod ethnic group )

can you explain your argument ?

Jews are not the only semites you can find many semitic looking people in all the countries where J is prevalent in the middle east, near east and caucasus and in south east europe. !!!!!!!!!

Well, "admixture" means infusion of white genes into your imaginary Jewish race, granted you concede this point by noting that this, red-hair, is not normally a Jewish trait so the red-haird Jews you refer to must have a European non-jewish ancestry("infusion"). The only questions left is how did this "admixture" happen and what frequency of "admixture" occurred! If this "admixture" is not the result of conversion, as you stated, and intermarriage the only alternative is rape and I hope this is not your suggestion. If today's behaviour of 50% of Jews marrying non-Jews is a guide to past behaviour, and there is no reason not to believe otherwise especially since the population percentage of Jews was smaller in the past, then every generation saw a geometically smaller ratio of "Jewish genes" through the process of dilution, this is probably why most Ashenazi European Jews are similar in appearance to their host populations and can assimilate so easily.

Yes, I am fully aware that two brunet parents can give rise to a blond-haired child but only if both carry the recessive trait of blondness and in the mix the child receives one of these recessive trait genes from each of the parents. The opposite is not true however, if two natural blond parents have children all the offspring will have blond hair and no brunets as the parents do not possess the dominant brunet hair color gene to pass on the the progeny. This coloration trait follows Mendelian laws.

My imaginary Jewish race?
Please quote where I called Jewish a race.

And that's exactly what I said - red haired Jews have White mixture.
It's quite clear in every post I've made about it.

Ashkenazi Jewish genenomes are not closer to their European neighbors than Middle Eastern peoples - who they are.

From Carmelli and Cavalli-Sforza (1979):

We can conclude by using Rh and Hp frequencies that the Jewish populations show a greater similarity to their ancestral origin.

If you want more studies - I can show you --- Jews are closer to their ancestors than Europeans.

And what you next said is not 100% true:
My grandparents were both blond - but one of my aunts is black, straight haired. My mother and three siblings are blond - but not her one sister.

Quite intriguing, isn't it?

But my point still stands - if Jews are 1% White on either side, it's possible to have a White trait from this.

Some people are saying jews are semites. Other semetic groups like arabs say they are not. Also interests me that arabs are called anti-semetic when arabs are in fact semites. Some people include ashkanasi jews as European.
.

These problems occur when people confuse race with language, semitic is a language classification. Race is in your DNA and it doesn't lie, the study of past migrations by lanuage is speculative and unreliable.

You are the same race as your GG-------G Grandfather and GG--------G Grandmother wether or not they spoke a different language and providing no one in between had children with someone of a different race.

These problems occur when people confuse race with language, semitic is a language classification. Race is in your DNA and it doesn't lie, the study of past migrations by lanuage is speculative and unreliable.

You are the same race as your GG-------G Grandfather and GG--------G Grandmother wether or not they spoke a different language and providing no one in between had children with someone of a different race.

Ok, so do Arabs and Jews technically belong to the caucasoid race group?

Liguistic, behavioral, cultural distiction.

Language in my opinion is important becuase people with certain neurophysiological predispositions will speak and interprate language differently than people who's brain developes differently. Also mathematics is the same part of the brain. Incidentally I noticed my friend with dislexia is pretty good at Tetris and I don't think it is coincidence. Just predisposition. While brain isn't everything.

Jews are considered Semitic because some of them speak Hebrew, a Semitic language. Hebrew had virtually died out for 2000 years and Jews have resurected it in the last 100 years, so just because someone learns a Semitic language does not mean they are related racially to people who spoke a Semitic language 3000 years ago.

I have been called an extremist, a reactionary, a revisionist, an elitist, a supremacist, a racist, a homophobe, an anti-Semite, a right-winger, a theocrat, a godless cynic, a fascist and, of course, a must for every German, a Nazi.

So, it should be expected that I have a foible for politically "incorrect" sites that every "modern," "decent," "civilized," "tolerant," and "enlightened" man is supposed to ignore and avoid.

J2 of eastern european farmers
J1 of Armenian origin (Armeniod ethnic group )

Can you show me the source of that information?

Neolithic was a semitic expansion:

The Neolithic Age, Era, or Period, or New Stone Age, was a period in the development of humantechnology, beginning about 9500 BC in the Middle East that is traditionally considered the last part of the Stone Age.

Neolithic culture began in the Levant (Jericho, modern-day West Bank) about 9500 BC.

The Neolithic Age, Era, or Period, or New Stone Age, was a period in the development of humantechnology, beginning about 9500 BC in the Middle East that is traditionally considered the last part of the Stone Age.

Neolithic culture began in the Levant (Jericho, modern-day West Bank) about 9500 BC.

Armenians which a part of them share with modern brown/olive arabs the same head shape ,hooked/big nose's
modern Armenians are not the Armenians of Neolithic era who are evolved in northern Mesopotamia as a new ethnic group in the middle east (j1 holders) because they are invaded by some other peoples (the people of G* and R1a* ,R1b*) who they are moved to the south , those Armeniods J1 are related to people of Zagros mountains (J2 Indo-europeans farmers from Anatolia and BALKAN ) like Kurds and caucasians and eastern Europeans farmers (holders of J2) than natives of Arabia and levant in neolithic era (holders of E1b1b1b and R1b1b1) (proto-semites)

don't forget that the first natives of middle east are linked to African groups (Afro-Asiatic family ) !

Assyrians as EXMEPLE of historical events origin's

so Modern Assyrians are Homogenous but the first Assyrians were Semitic people but got Destroyed by Kurds(arians) and they Assyrianized the poor white Caucasian Hurrians (kurdish-indo-europeans)! so todays Assyrians are majority Hurrians by heritage who just speak the Semitic Assyrian Language! otherwise Their Dances,Faces,Clothes....= Armenian ,you can note the presence of Armeniod gens J1* Lineage's ! also those Armeniods are (Hurro-Urartian people mixed with Armens of Europe). Assyrians are not living in Central Iraq as Before! They came from Hakkari and Urmia (Central parts of Kurdistan) and this Area was the heart lands of Hurrians!.this is why majority of them are of J2* Lineage's from plains of zagros﻿ mountains

technically proto-Semites are of E1b1b1 because they are first sailors and first farmers but also indigenous in middle east and people of J*-DNA are related to European groups in neolithic era !!

note that semitic langauges are the last branch of afro-asiatic family and haplotype does not mean race !

Armenoid Ethnic type

A similar brachycephalic composite type, with the same head form as the Dinaric, but a larger face and nose. The pigmentation is almost entirely brunet, the pilous development of beard and body abundant, the nose high rooted, convex, and the tip depressed, especially in advanced age. The difference between the Armenoid and the Dinaric is that here it is the Irano-Afghan race which furnishes the Mediterranean element, brachycephalized by Alpine mixture.