Media Power
and Media Control

The major
influence on our knowledge and views is the media.
Newspapers, Books, magazines, Television, wireless and now increasingly
the
Internet. Who controls them is a major issue; one which the media
itself chooses
to largely ignore, in public at all events. The
Education
industry has an important part in shaping our
children's' minds as well as our own. It is one we should pay attention to.
Home Schooling is an answer.

If they are
honest men telling it like it is then it is as good as it gets. If they are rogues with different agendas they will
uncover
different aspects of what is going on. But if they are rogues with
similar
agendas there is a major problem. There are a few owners, editors and
apparatchiks
shaping the agenda. It might be as many as
a thousand but not much more. A
lot of power is concentrated in the hands of a small group. It matters.

The owner of a Newspaper
has control over it. He is subject to various forces but he can, at least
dictate the general tone of the editorial. Editors can be sacked and have been
sacked. Print unions can also have major effects although it is not normally the
content that concerns them. Newspapers can be shut down and the staff dismissed.
It has been done by Rupert Murdoch to
The Times. The printers were not
amused and never did get their jobs back. The electricians
took over, leaving the printers to fume on the dole.

Print
is the sharpest and the strongest weapon of our party.
Joseph
Stalin

Samizdat - The Free Press - comes first as a salute to courageQUOTESome of these underground newspapers amazingly achieved secret circulations
of tens of thousands. Some of them were so popular that they continue in
publication to the present day. Amongst current Dutch papers which
originated in the wartime illegal underground press are
Het Parool. (The
Catchword [ "The
Password"?
or "The Motto"?
- Editor ]),
Trouw (Faith), and
Vrij Nederland (Free Netherlands), the last
of which has a present circulation of 45,000 (slightly less than it reached
during the Nazi occupation) and this month (September 2010) celebrated its
70th anniversary.UNQUOTEThe Samizdat was the
underground press in the USSR. There was also Iskra
[ The Spark ] which the
Bolsheviks smuggled in to Russia and caused a
massive fire. Publishing then took courage. Now it just takes money and evil
intent.

Channel 4 Is an English television broadcaster which tells it like it is from time
to time, if not more often. They got stuck into the
Israel Lobby.

Net NeutralityIs about
power, the ability of the companies owning the cables to control what we send,
what we receive. They want power to sabotage our downloads - unless we pay more.
It is about Capitalist Swine who want more
money - our money of course.

Private Eye
Gets its
entry near the beginning because it is the nearest thing to honest
reportage in the English media; one that is not controlled by special
interests. The only other major exception that comes to mind is the
Internet which in principle is open to anyone who has a computer.

Death of
the Media
The dead wood media and the main stream media are on their
way down. Am I all broke up about their profit margins? Not a chance. It is
the lying and perversion of the truth that get to me.

The Guardian And
Perverting The Truth
QUOTE
This website proves that the British political controversy of the 1990s, the
so-called 'cash for questions' affair, was an invention. The evidence within
these pages shows that the most influential newspaper in British society,
the liberal Guardian, had dreamt up the story in a bid to oust from
power the Conservative Government of Prime Minister John Major.
UNQUOTE
Two provincial journalists write, telling us that Mohamed Fayed is deeply
corrupt, the Metropolitan Police ditto and the media have morals to match.
It sounds right to me and makes Private
Eye's coverage look timid. Backed up in c:/data 2/people

The Guardian, The
Arrogance And The Agenda
QUOTE
In the late 1970s, when I was living in England, The
Guardian was the most Soviet friendly of all British broadsheet
newspapers, constantly trying to find excuses for Soviet behaviour by
implying that the West was morally at least as evil as its adversaries.
Apparently The Guardian has learned no lessons from the fall of
Communism in 1989. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Who is to guard
the guards themselves?)...... This is a question
one may ask now that Albert Scardino, a senior editor of British left-wing
newspaper The Guardian, resigned after web logger Scott Burgess
revealed on The Daily Ablution that The Guardian had engaged
Dilpazier Aslam, a member of Hizb ut Tahrir, an al-Qaeda related
organisation, as a trainee journalist and political commentator. On 13 July,
Aslam wrote
an
op-ed piece in The Guardian, stating that the British could not
pretend “that the [7/7 London] bombings happened through no responsibility
of [their] own.” Burgess’s
revelation of Aslam’s membership of HuT that same 13 July was picked up
by other bloggers and the mainstream media, which finally led to Aslam being
sacked and the resignation of Scardino, who had known about the HuT
membership of his trainee.

What possessed these people to think they could turn
their paper into a platform for al-Qaeda and get away with it? The answer is
arrogance. The same arrogance that characterized so many editors and
journalists during the Cold War, when much of the Western press acted as a
vehicle for Soviet policy. Journalists could be openly communist and that
was accepted, while those who stood for freedom and democracy against the
Soviets were regarded as intolerant or extreme. It was not done for the
press in Western Europe to side with its own side. On the contrary, anyone
who was anti-American was regarded as morally and intellectually superior.
In the couple of decades since the Cold War the attitudes of the press have
not changed. Their basic instinct is to side with whoever happens to be
fighting against America. From worshippers of communism they have now become
condoners of terrorism. To even dream of doing so in a country which has
experienced terrorism first-hand throughout the war in Northern Ireland only
indicates the extent of their arrogance.
UNQUOTEAntonio Gramsci,
the chief theoretician of the communist party is still the dominant force in
the main stream media, politics, law, you name it. Do they ever apologize
for the evil they do? Not a chance. Also The Guardian And
Perverting The Truth

Hollywood
Has the power of pictures which go direct to the
subconscious mind. It is very influential. It is run by Jews, for Jews.

How To Frame A Patriot
Barry Krusch writes about HOW it is done. He is interested in the mechanics of
media manipulation rather than being a sympathiser. It is in .pdf format
unfortunately but well worth a read.

Jews Control The Media
Perhaps it is only 96% but it is a very effective stranglehold and Yes there
is a reason. Our well being is not it; quite the reverse. This covers more
ground than the previous piece.

Jews Incite Hatred
They pay blacks to make rap music full of foul mouthed incitement to hate.
Jews are criminals on the make. Jews get away with it because they have
influence with corrupt politicians.

Main Stream
Media's Master Manipulators Are Jews
QUOTEThe Mind-Benders is an analysis of
the media power in Great Britain. Written in 1997, it details how (and why) the
information we receive via the media is censored and distorted. If we are to
avoid insidious totalitarianism we must be aware of the enormous control over
every form of mass media the Jews possess and – in any democratic society under
such powerful influences – who are the real manipulators of political power...........

Who are the
manipulators?

But who is behind it all? Who are the people who determine
what is watched on television and printed in the newspapers? This is not so
easy a study because a great many of the people concerned operate in the
shadows. And even in the case of those whose names are known, what is known
about their backgrounds and their connections? Very little.

For this reason, very few people in Britain are aware of the huge
influence over the mass media exercised by a certain ethnic minority, namely
the Jews.

Students of Jewish influence in the mass media will notice a paradox:
while that influence is used, in a hundred or more different ways, to weaken
the national spirit and racial pride of the British people, Jews themselves,
in their attitude to their Israeli homeland and to questions of Zionism
generally, are to be found amongst the world's most militant nationalists.
In other words, what is good for us is definitely not good for them!UNQUOTE
Jews have their fingers in many pies all the way up to the armpits. This is
another analysis of a very ugly truth.

Mass Media 101
Barry Krusch tells us in detail how the media are controlled.
The owners really are the bosses. Advertisers have power too because they feed in
the advertising revenue or not as the case may be. Agendas are there. But
the media are businesses too.

Main Stream
Media On The SkidsQUOTEThe
news that the Sun newspaper has taken its hat off to David Cameron and the
Conservative party has been met with glee by me and many others. However,
exactly how much of an impact this will have on votes is not quite as certain as
it was in 1997, when they famously did the same for Labour, as the Campbell
diaries reveal ‘the fruit of three years hard work’.

The
reason for this is the advancing role the internet plays in news reporting.
Blogs, Twitter and many sites provide free, on the minute, as it happens news
which many people access from the workplace, the kitchen table, or study in
their own home. They no longer have to wait until the next day to pay for a
newspaper to tell them news the blogs may have already been running for 20hrs......

During
Easter,
Guido highlighted on his blog the manner in which the Telegraph had behaved
during smeargate and entirely exposed the newspapers dependence on and closeness
to Damian McBride.....

You
only have to look at sites like
PoliticsHome , to
realise that what you get free online is far superior to any thing you pay for
in terms of news content. Read the Guardian
Comment is
free blog, or the Spectator Coffee
House for high standard editorial written by journalists such as James
Forsyth, to wonder just how long does the printed press have left, and who will
survive?......

The
world will hear. People in every country will know, the news can and will travel
the globe, instantly, and most importantly it will do it for free.UNQUOTE
An MP writes. She looks rather nice.

Media
and the CIA
The CIA
ran a major operation to control and influence the media in America.
Illegal? Perhaps but they did it anyway.

The Media
And Israel
Israel is cast as a victim of the media. Sounds very odd to
me. But the source is a good reporter, someone I believe. You have no
obligation to agree. Read for yourself. See what you think.

Media
and Racism
They can't be racist, can they? They keep
telling us that racism is awful. It all depends who is being racist.
Hating Englishmen and Americans is fine. Blacks are always victims - if
you believe the media.
PS I do not.

Media Lies
The
government lied to us about a major security nausea at London's
airports. The media fed us the party line and never even hinted at the
truth.

Media Massacre
Enforcing the party line is the name of the game. John Swinton
found out long ago. Nothing has changed.

Moment - A Jewish
Magazine Explains
Here are some quotes from a magazine for
Jews called "Moment". It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the
90's" These quotes are from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline
"Jews Run Hollywood - So What?": "It makes no sense at all to try to
deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture. Any
list of the most influential production executives at each of the major
movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish
names."

"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."

"The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.
These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines for
nearly
all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn't,
at
national and international levels. They originate the news; the others
merely
copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands...The Sulzberger
family also owns, through the New York Times Co. 36 other newspapers;
twelve
magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle..."

"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the Daily
News.
The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish real-estate developer
Peter
Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern.
Source:- http://jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-folder.html

Net Neutrality
Net neutrality on the Internet sounds obscure. It is but its enemies have an
agenda. They want to rob us blind. News this is not. It is worth knowing what is
going on here.

Newspapers Are Dying
They were profitable, influential then the wireless became an
option. Television was another news channel. The Internet was the real option,
one that made publishing cheap, easy worthwhile. Paper is no longer the only
way.

Other Sources
- Fred's Recommendations
Newspapers can assume that their subscribers can
at least read but, intelligence being pyramidal in
distribution, have to focus of the lower end.........

By contrast, web sites have few of these
problems........ Collectively you might call them “a
free press.”

There are for example Taki’s
Magazine, leaning hard to the political Right
but thoughtful, beautifully written, fearless, and
possessed of a beguiling aristocratic snottiness;
the Unz Review,
leaning hard in all directions at once but written
by and for a cognitive elite; Anti-War.com,
not sucking up to military industry; Tom
Dispatch, extraordinarily informed analyst of
imperial policy; Counterpunch,
hard Left but highly intelligent, and the Drudge
Report, half grocery-store tabloid and half
unintimidatable teller-like-it-is, sort of America’s
thermometer.

Papers
There are
no more than a dozen nationals in England with rather fewer owners and
editorial policies. They had power as propaganda tools for shaping
people's opinions but now the Internet is giving us something that they
do not which is the truth. There are also lies and rubbish but you
have some chance of sorting one from the other.

Joseph PulitzerQUOTE
After the World exposed an illegal payment of $40 million by the United
States to the French Panama Canal Company in 1909, Pulitzer was indicted for
libeling
Theodore Roosevelt and
J. P.
Morgan. The courts dismissed the indictments.

In 1892, Pulitzer offered
Columbia University's president,
Seth Low,
money to set up the world's first school of journalism. The university initially
turned down the money, evidently turned off by Pulitzer's unscrupulous
character.UNQUOTETeddy Roosevelt was a very big man. Morgan was a big
time manipulator. The Wiki implies that they were guilty as charged. Wall Street
did not hesitate to finance the Bolshevik
Revolution for personal gain. The dirt on Pulitzer, a Jew of course is
elusive.

Rupert
Murdoch
Rupe is enormous in media, having power
and abusing power is the name of the game. Here is
another view of the issue:-Who
Rules America?
QUOTE
The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media Must Be Broken
UNQUOTE
This sounds rather paranoid. Can it possibly be true? Follow the
evidence and the answer is; Yes, it can be true. Yes, it is true.

Russia
Israel and Media Omission
Jews took over Russia by controlling Boris Yeltsin, robbed
Her blind then made off to Israel or other countries they control. Were we
told? No! They control the media. They control what we know.

Soap Operas
Are very much part of the main stream media, seen by many
millions and deadly effective as a result. The average man or especially woman
does not see them as vehicles for promoting Marxism.
They are none the less propaganda vehicles, sugar coated and cunningly used.

Has turned into a Left Wing tool because it
is restricted to short messages; long enough for slogans but too short for
reasoned articles.

Internet
Control
The Internet is free, isn't it? Yes, more
or less but there are powerful politicians and businessmen with agendas
and controlling it is a big objective. The freedom it gave was granted
by accident. The ability to tell the truth was definitely not what
governments want. The Wikipedia is one part that has been created to
follow the agenda of one man. It is like those newspapers - controlled
mainly by men with the same passports - Israeli passports that is. See Control of internet information

Pondering
The Telescreen
You thought that television was bad? It
is worse. Fred explains in his usual cheerful style. He is a better
writer than me so he makes the point better albeit he does not tell us
who controls the rubbish or why.
QUOTE
What does Hollyork promote? Toleration of foul language and a
concomitant coarsening of society; hostility between men and women;
truculent illiteracy and the values of the black ghetto; the elevation
of homosexuality and promiscuity; disdain for religion; use of drugs,
interracial sex, destructive feminism, eradication of the remnants of
Anglo-European Christian civilization. It is not accidental.
UNQUOTE

Wikipedia
Sells itself as the online encyclopaedia
that anyone can edit. The truth is rather different.

The
Wikipedia and
Propaganda
Why tell
the truth when you can lie? The Wiki's claims about Jewish involvement
in the Bolshevik Revolution are compared with Robert Wilton's. He was
reporting for The Times and was there on the day.

Wikipedia
and Vandalism
Yes, they do get vandals changing pages.
Yes they have to do something about it. No they do not have to be
politically biased.

Between the
wars Claud Cockburn realized that the newspapers of the day were
feeding the public a very bland version of reality, the reality that
was the common currency of diplomats, journos and even politicians. His
insight led him to publish The Week which was fun, subversive and, in
practice, impossible to sue. A libel action can take your money but if
you have none, you are much safer. The Week has gone but now we have a
new irritant for those who dislike the truth.

This
new wild
card is the
Internet. Designed
by DARPA for military communications, it has given ordinary people the
ability
to communicate worldwide. It is fair to say that a lot of their
communication is
third rate or worse but some is better. Telling the gold from the dross
is not
too difficult. The real payoff is that it bypasses the media moguls and
governments. That is why we must be deeply suspicious of anyone who is
selling
us the solution to problems on the Net. Pornography is not pleasant. We
hear the
stories. Some of them might even be true. Yes; Spam is a problem.
Certainly we
could all do without it but offers to control the Net and prevent it
are offers
to control our lives; offers to give governments the power that they
all seem to
like far too much. If the choice on offer is Spam or government, I will
settle
for Spam.

ABC's culture of contempt
The Australian Broadcasting Commission is an arm's length management
organisation [ ALMO ] with its own left wing agenda and an enthusiasm
for denying it. Notice the names of the guilty, or should I
say, the accused? The agenda is exactly the same as that of the BBC,
inciting communism and homosexuality plus other trendy nastiness.

AIPAC:
Still Spying, Still Tax-Exempt
How many espionage operations get tax exemption? Not too many is the
answer especially if they happen to be known as spies. But if they also
have political influence and media control it becomes that much easier.
That is how AIPAC does it.

BBC
The Beeb is known, respected, trusted et
cetera. That is what they want us to believe but not
everyone thinks they are perfect. Some of us think they have
abused their position very cleverly. They
have been at the forefront when it comes to inciting homosexuality.
They have a motive for that. Their Alexa rating is 10 which means nine
sites get more traffic. See
BBC Online

BBC
'wanted to sack Humphrys' [ 6 October 2005 ]
Green and Thompson wanted
to sack John Humphrys after he told the truth and was betrayed by a
Labour spy. Sacking would have proved that they were toeing the
government line. They bottled out when it when public.

BURYING
THE LANCET - PART 1
The Lancet told us that that 100,000 had
been killed in Iraq. The media and politicians claimed that they were
incompetent and wrong or just plain wrong. The media are
liars with an agenda. So are the politicians of course. Here is a
longish factual analysis.

BURYING
THE LANCET - PART 2
Count deaths in the Congo
and count deaths in Iraq. Get accepted without question for the Congo
while getting called incompetents over Iraq. This is from men
who are deeply ignorant of maths except for the purposes of expense
claims and tax fraud.

BURYING
THE LANCET - Update
Various people with
various degrees of expertise respond. We are invited to tell various
journos and reptiles that they are ignorant patter merchants.

Encyclopædia
Britannica
QUOTE
In 1996, the Britannica was bought from the
Benton Foundation by
Jacqui Safra at well below its estimated value, owing to the company's
financial difficulties. The
Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. company split in 1999. One part
retained the company name and developed the print version, and the
other part, Britannica.com Inc., developed the digital versions.....
UNQUOTE
Is owned by a Jew,
Jacqui Safra since 1996. It was bought in 1920 by Julius Rosenwald through
Sears Roebuck.

Google
QUOTE
Google
is owned by Google, Inc. whose
mission statement is to "organize the world's information and
make it universally accessible and useful". The largest search engine
on the web, Google receives several hundred million queries each day
through its various services.
UNQUOTE
It was set up by a Jew,
Sergey Brin, and a Jew who needs a shave, Larry Page.
It now owned by
Google Inc. and has over 15,000
employees.

Haaretz
Some newspapers tell some of the truth
some of the time. Haaretz is honest - some times. It is the publicly
respectable face of Israel. It is widely read and on the Internet. It
tells us things that Jewish politicians would prefer us not to know but
there are significant differences between the English version and the
Hebrew version which is for home consumption only. Then there is their
own search engine which hides things from me, others too
I suspect.

Horrific Media Spikes
This offering from Ted Lang popped up
somewhere else entitled Jews Spike the News. That is a fair title. He
tells us about the Jew who left the Department of Defence with the
benefit of a news black out after a US$1 trillion went missing. Yes, a
trillion, which is to say a thousand billion. Even in a world inured to
politicians wasting billions rather than mere millions, a trillion is a
LOT of money to defraud, steal, lose,
find, give
to your little mates or what ever.

Lord
Northcliffe and The Times
Lord Northcliffe was a very
successful newspaper owner and founded The Daily Mail among others. His
fall from power was due to foul play and has an important lesson for
us. He upset Zionists and his editor Wickham Steed had him locked up as
a lunatic. It was simple, brutal and very effective. So was the news
blackout that followed it. The National Vanguard tells us in some
detail. The
Wikipedia tells us that he died under
suspicious circumstances but no more.
The Zionist Conspiracy against Publishing
the Protocols is
much more forthcoming.

Louis
Farrakhan and
the Media
When a man gets a dreadful press it just
might be that he deserves better. There is a case for the Honourable
Minister Louis Farrakhan which is a case against the media and its
owners.

Journalistic Fraud [
27 July 2010 ]QUOTE
Propaganda is associated in the popular mind with totalitarian regimes.............
In fact, the advent of the information age has made propaganda much more
pervasive than it ever was in any of those societies. What is more, despite the
constant development of ever more subtle applications of propaganda techniques,
modern manifestations in the ‘free’ mainstream Western media can be just as
crude as the worst examples ever to appear under the yoke of Eastern
Communism........

Case in point is
Michael Sheridan’s
recent article
in the New York Daily News,.....
And the 16-word title
alone deploys no less than 10 of such techniques (ad
hominem, name-calling,
stereotyping, demonizing the enemy, lying, appeal to fear, appeal to prejudice,
labelling, and thought-terminating cliché),
some of which are later redeployed in the main text. If you consider that out of
the 16 words 8 are names, that means that there is more propaganda in the title
than there are actual words.UNQUOTEJournalism is
fraud. Fraud is journalism. It is not quite that simple really but it can be.
Some newspapers tell some of the truth some of the time. That is nearer to
reality. Pictures are very effective because they got straight to the
subconscious whereas reading slows us down a bit, making us use the conscious
part of our brain.

Media Cover-up
QUOTE
Leading Journalists Expose Major Cover-ups by Media Corporations
UNQUOTE
Systematic lying tells me that there is an agenda [ or more
]. Journos write about the cover ups that were forced onto them. They
found out
about the power in the press as distinct from the power of the press.
Systematic, deliberate, wide ranging lies are propagated by the press.
People
have decided to talk. See what the insiders have to say at:- http://www.wanttoknow.info/mediacover-up

The New York Times
Is Run By Jews For Jews [ 26 February 2010 ]
QUOTE
Do You Have to be Jewish to Report on Israel for the New York
Times?
A recent assignment of mine covering Israel’s presumed links to
the assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh provoked some more thoughts
about the New York Times reporter Ethan Bronner. He is the Jerusalem bureau
chief who has been at the centre of a controversy since it was revealed last
month that his son is serving in the Israeli army. Despite mounting pressure to
replace Bronner, the NYT’s editors have so far refused to consider that he might
be facing a conflict of interest or that it would be wiser to post him
elsewhere..... A more interesting question than whether Bronner is now facing a
conflict of interest over his son serving in the Israeli army is whether the NYT
reporter was facing such a conflict long before the latest revelations surfaced.
Could it be that it is actually incumbent on Bronner, as the NYT’s bureau chief,
to have such a conflict of interest? [ Hint: Yes! - Editor ]UNQUOTEJonathan Cook is an
Englishman in the business. Living in Bethlehem means that he knows the
Palestinians. Does this mean that the NY Times is different from the rest? No,
not in the main.

Pysops = Psychological Operations
QUOTE
"To this end," Vallely and co-author continued, "MindWar must be
strategic in emphasis,............In its strategic context, MindWar
must reach out to friends, enemies, and neutrals alike across the
globe—neither through primitive 'battlefield' leaflets and
loudspeakers of PSYOP nor through the weak, imprecise, and narrow
effort of psychotronics—but through the media possessed by
the United States which have the capabilities to reach virtually all
people on the face of the Earth. These media are, of course the electronic
media—television and radio. State of the art developments in
satellite communication, video recording techniques, and laser and
optical transmission of broadcasts make possible a penetration of the
minds of the world such as would have been inconceivable just a few
years ago. Like the sword Excalibur [King Arthur's magical
sword—ed.], we have but to reach out and seize this tool; and
it can transform the world for us if we have the courage and the
integrity to enhance civilization with it. If we do not accept
Excalibur, then we relinquish our ability to inspire foreign cultures
with our morality. If they can then desire moralities unsatisfactory to
us, we have no choice but to fight them on a more brutish level."
UNQUOTE
The media are a weapon of war although I doubt that these twerps have
what it takes to use it. They already are being used in the culture war
being waged by Hollywood, the BBC and the rest of the alphabet soup
that feed our children's minds.

Pulitzer-Winning
Lies
Walter Durante reported
from Russia under Stalin, claimed that there was no famine in the
Ukraine and lied in his teeth. The New York Times suspected that he was
lying and ran the stories anyway.

Racism
and the Media
The media are very big on racism and
blaming Englishmen. The reality is not quite the same.

'We
Don't Own the News Any More' [ 6 October 2005 ]
'We' don't control it totally either and
even if 'we' did 'we' are not trusted any more. We [ real people as
distinct from 'we',
the media ] have got our own news channels now. We can
broadcast over the Internet. 'We' don't like it. 'We' have not got
total control any more. Notice that the BBC acts as an arm of the
police state, carrying out espionage operations against political
dissidents [ of the right, but never the
left ] and having them prosecuted - maliciously of course.

Any one
who tells us that the Internet should be controlled should be regarded
with grave suspicion. They will have the standard excuses; child
pornography, identity theft and so on. The media is still immensely
powerful. It is not as crude as the propaganda machine in the USSR.
Subtlety makes it far more effective.

Who
Runs the Media? The Full Story
Someone else has taken the point that the media are controlled by Jews,
which in practice means Zionists. He gives us sources. They are
checkable.