JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Data from: In an age of open access to research policies: physician and public health NGO staff research use and policy awareness

Moorhead LL, Holzmeyer C, Maggio LA, Steinberg RM, Willinsky JM

Date Published: July 27, 2015

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7g984

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad
Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree
to the Dryad Terms of Service.
To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright
and related or neighboring rights to this data.

Title

ReadMeFile_013015

Downloaded

19 times

Description

ReadMe file, including a description of all files and variable definitions (codebook).

Cleaned dataset. Participant questions to “Before participating in this study, had you heard of the NIH Public Access Policy?” See ReadMeFile_013015 for more information, including variable definitions (codebook).

Stata .do file for analysing data. Highlights code and process for generating tables and figures in manuscript. See ReadMeFile_013015 for more information, including variable definitions (codebook). Also, see manuscript.

Raw dataset, uncleaned. Note: There are some duplication of observations in the raw file. These can be noted as all variables for the observations are identical. The “cleaned” files remove these duplicates. See ReadMeFile_013015 for more information, including variable definitions (codebook).

Moorhead LL, Holzmeyer C, Maggio LA, Steinberg RM, Willinsky JM (2015) In an age of open access to research policies: physician and public health NGO staff research use and policy awareness. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0129708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129708

Additionally, please cite the Dryad data package:

Moorhead LL, Holzmeyer C, Maggio LA, Steinberg RM, Willinsky JM (2015) Data from: In an age of open access to research policies: physician and public health NGO staff research use and policy awareness. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7g984

AbstractIntroduction: Through funding agency and publisher policies, an increasing proportion of the health sciences literature is being made open access. Such an increase in access raises questions about the awareness and potential utilization of this literature by those working in health fields. Methods: A sample of physicians (N=336) and public health non-governmental organization (NGO) staff (N=92) were provided with relatively complete access to the research literature indexed in PubMed, as well as access to the point-of-care service UpToDate, for up to one year, with their usage monitored through the tracking of web-log data. The physicians also participated in a one-month trial of relatively complete or limited access. Results: The study found that participants' research interests were not satisfied by article abstracts alone nor, in the case of the physicians, by a clinical summary service such as UpToDate. On average, a third of the physicians viewed research a little more frequently than once a week, while two-thirds of the public health NGO staff viewed more than three articles a week. Those articles were published since the 2008 adoption of the NIH Public Access Policy, as well as prior to 2008 and during the maximum 12-month embargo period. A portion of the articles in each period was already open access, but complete access encouraged a viewing of more research articles. Conclusion: Those working in health fields will utilize more research in the course of their work as a result of (a) increasing open access to research, (b) improving awareness of and preparation for this access, and (c) adjusting public and open access policies to maximize the extent of potential access, through reduction in embargo periods and access to pre-policy literature.