On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 12:17:26PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 10:35:05PM -0700, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> > The prototype strings were broken again.
>
> Looking at your patch it is the valence code that are broken, not the
> string, or was I mistaken ?
Correct.
> I think we should remove completly valence code from GP. They are not
> used anymore, not documented and wrong.
They are used (by Math::Pari), documented, and are correct (at least
with my patches). Moreover, now they are very easy to check for
correctness.
Ilya