Name for Networking App.

Yarışma Özeti

Hello All,

I am in the process of developing a networking app. The intent of this app is to act as a tool to allow users to meet new people outside of their current network of people. It can be used for social networking, professional networking, dating, anything etc. I am in the process of trying to think of a name for the app. Hence, I am asking for everyone to propose some names that they think would be fitting.

I am looking for something catchy like Facebook, Tinder, linked-in. etc. The name needs to be a universal name, which can be fitting to both a professional and social environment.

Sir , My entry was #59 (pebble) . Sir , I had a suggestion that you can keep the apps name as pebble and have the domain name as greatpebble.com or keep the name of the app directly as Greatpebble.com . What do you think about this sir ?

By available .com, i dont mean the exact name, I am just asking for you to propose a .com name. like for Mingle, Mingle-app.com etc. Having the exact name would be nice tho. But for now, anything goes with the .com as long as it is related to the name and the use of the name, as a app.

I know that. then they should post it or write it in description. so whats the purpose when the ch tells should be available in.com if you just assume to add it with app. That's my question.

4 yıl önce

Yarışma Sahibi

4 yıl önce

If the .com is not available, still submit them. Just try find a .com which is available and related to the name. like name-app.com etc. Still submit it tho. If the name is good enough i am fine with not having the .com. If the name is good enough hehe

Sir, Please check entry before rate. Some of your top rated entry is not available in domain like .com or other. You can check your top 3 or first 3. They are not available. So, please check before accept. Thank You.

Dear CH, I would like to let you know that I have already submitted the name "Entourage" in my entry #54. You may want to reconsider it. Thank you,
@neptos Your suggestion #147 is a copy of my suggestion.