All posts tagged strawman the real story of your artificial person

Looking back, it seems I have spent my entire activist life seeking to find or make some goodness out of otherwise bad things. You, sadly, have proven to be no exception. How can I explain my tortured disposition right now? How do I shed the poison, the parasitic black hole that is Jan Irvin from my life and my reputation while helping others to avoid that not-so-hidden beast? Why did I allow you to be the straw that broke the camels back, so to speak — the causal effect to stopping my own show and lamely wither away like a poisoned weed? Why am I acting like such a little bitch, as if I’m some beaten down Hollywood starlet protecting her producer or directors’ immoral behaviors to get the part I wanted? And why am I allowing you to continue to poison and parasite off of not only my name and research but those others I seek to help and guide?

Well screw that!

#Metoo
#Timesup

To be frank, I have so many more important things to do than to try and counter your completely ridiculous false information and fallacious accusations about not merely myself but my family name. I’m sure hundreds of others out here feel the same; former research partners, friends, supporters, guests, and listeners all caught up like unwitting insects in the grill of that Gnostic steamroller that is your paranoid life. You are as the consummate spider, wrapping us into various cocoons within your spun web of lies and deceit, slowly sucking out the mojo, the will to carry on, and the soul of each victim to sustain your delusional existence and income, only to cut us loose once we’ve been drained of our usefulness like a pincushion pocked full of voodoo needles.

Yet, though I’d much rather be working on more beneficial things, you’ve placed the splinter of unwarranted doubt and distrust wheresoever your wormed-tongue has touched, and where your corrupt fingers have typed. And all this, suddenly, without warning, for reasons still unknown to me, even after my last Skype to you before the new year was to express my undying friendship and support despite the apparent army of handlers and trolls you claim that are after you. How foolish I feel now, believing your nonsensically conspiratorial concerns, even feeling sorry for your plight, and thus allowing a sociopath into my life the only way they know how to infiltrate — by pretending, by feigning friendship and emotion, and by triggering others to offer their own friendship and loyalty like the hopeful prey blindly turning its back in trust to its conniving predator. And so I feel the same presence of mind to overturn your ongoing historical hatchet-job and rhetorical scams as the story of the Christos did to the moneychangers, even as you continue to poison the temple and the Law, completely misusing and misdirecting in your rhetoric the scriptural intent and meaning I now teach straight from the Source.

The fact is that you abuse just about everyone within your digital, virtual reach, this being your number one complaint from both donating fans and whatever name you are currently labeling everyone else, be it trolls, agents, or whatever fits your conspiracy narrative. The word dick is actually the proper and most widely used colorful metaphor to describe your behavior and tone, used by your victims and fans alike. But what you’ve done to me, a friend and supporting colleague for almost a decade now, is not merely preposterous and downright evil, but 100% fallacious in every way. Yet, looking back, should I not have seen it coming? Any psychologist watching would have warned me of impending doom. After all, what parasite doesn’t eventually either harm or kill its host before discarding it without care for its well-being? Parasitically speaking, Jan, one must appreciate the extra care you’ve taken to ensure my personal spark to be extinguished behind you. Above and beyond, Jan, really. Like the wasp that stings its prey to deliver parasites because the wasp itself is already parasitically driven to do so, you’ve been using my reputation, and even my family name as fodder for your fallacious accusations so as to nourish and fester them, devouring me as sustenance while I sit paralyzed like a zombie watching it happen. But that’s what victims of parasitic infection do. They relax and watch helplessly as that which infests them chemically lobotomize any will to fight back, until the ability is no longer a part of their being even as their very life force is being sucked dry. They even protect the parasite that feeds off of them, if that is what the sociological programming of the parasite instructs.

You haven’t just become adept at uncovering the logical fallacies of others, but instead have learned to use them all as weapons. You do so not to help the user see his or her mistake in logic, but to disparage, to demonize, and often to banish, then go in for the kill by applying your own payload of twisted logic and disturbing insult while emotionally pummeling those who point out your own fallacious rhetoric, no matter their intentions or relationship to you. With me, you simply did as you often do, as bouts of paranoia continuously spark your twisted noodle into behavioral psychopathy, using unprovable, positive accusations and descriptions to demean my character, to poison my well. Never mind the argument, forget the facts… attack the messenger so as to ignore the primary source. Apparently you feel that if you talk about the use of logical fallacies by others long enough, pointing them out incessantly to the point that no full conversation or debate can ever actually take place and thus leaving an empty feeling in both the audience and the guest, that the falsehoods your own argument is based on will just be forgotten in the shuffle, the fallacious logic going unchecked?

Well I got news for you, sunshine, you’ve left a recorded audio, comment, and email trail of your particular brand of mayhem and madness behind, exposing the very nature of the narcissistic, parasitic sociopath you are, and now the taxman is cometh to collect. But first, we must provide an invoice; a history of your transactions within the borders of your own false dialectic and insanity…

As you well know, as a basic rule in science, it is said that one cannot prove a negative. Therefore, I cannot prove I am not something that you accuse me of, any more than you can prove that I am (because I’m not). How do I prove that I am not what Jan Irvin fallaciously says I am? The fact is, I can’t. And that’s why you did it, because you know most everyone out there will never check the veracity of your claims, let alone yourself ever offering any backing evidence. The murderer often gains the unwarranted trust of victims before sleighing them. Metaphorically, this is what you’ve done to your audience, including myself. And it’s no fun being on your particular chopping block, man, which is perhaps the reason I’ve been so silent for all these years. But even worse, how do I possibly pull such spewed venom from those you’ve bitten with your sinister charm and pathologically lying, accusatory disposition? For again, no one can prove something is not true, only that it is true. Amazingly this is the very foundation of law, for all of Nature is negative, self-existence, the I AM, which is why governments create positive (legal) identities and law, to identify all things negative (Real, of Nature), including men, as positive properties (by assigning artificial, legal names, titles, numbers, barcodes, etc.). To control the name or title, fallacious and inaccurate as it may be, is to control that which the name or title is attached, be it accurate or a lie. You’ve taken this legalism strategy, which not ironically stems from the and ancient “logicians,” to a whole new level though. For not only do you create the fallacious title like a deranged child, you then label and attempt to control the lies you place on anyone and everyone around you. In other words, you’ve created a blanket straw man argument called “troll” or “dirty” or “agent” or “CIA” or any other nondescript, unprovable, positively charged name/title, throwing it out like a darkly radiant, 360 degree fishing net. Your listeners, of course, don’t want to fall under that net, and so they walk on glass around you, knowing that any comment they might make, factual as it may be, could earn them a negatively applied title for their own efforts. Like unwitting dolphins, many good guys get caught in your careless net just like the very few actual bad guys, if there even are any. Sadly for you, you’ve hunted the sea almost dry and have hooked too many good people on your line of craziness before callously tossing us back into the sea, hurt, confused, and victimized, but at least more experienced, more hardened for our mistakes, so that we may recognize the signs of such unseen lures by unpredictable, abusive fishers of men as yourself. Meanwhile, I am guessing there are dozens if not hundreds of us out here unable to prove the negative to your positive. I’m dirty because Jan says it’s so. I’m CIA because Jan doesn’t like me or my information anymore. I’m must be an agent because Jan Irvin doesn’t like the fact that my primary sources contradict his secondary or Theosophic ones. I certainly must be a troll because I asked an uncomfortable question that might lead to rational thought and discussion, or for God’s sake, might un-spin your entire Gnostic web, your limited hangout “brain” program, to be a fraud.

So what am I to do, now that you have falsely but with so much confident arrogance outed me as an agent for the CIA that is out to get you, as someone that is dirty and likely working with many others that are also out to get you? How do I prove you wrong? How do I disprove your positive?

Simply put, I cannot. Because I (nor anyone, for that matter) can prove the negative. The problem is, neither can anyone else that hears your bullshit, completely unsourced and un-vetted fallacious attacks. Now my own friends, followers, and readers don’t know if they can trust me, all because Jan says I’m (probably) a dirtyagent of the CIA. Your probability drive is broken, Jan.

So how do I escape the web of your sociopathic brain…

That’s it! It’s so simple!

Put me in your brain program! Show us all the CIA connections. I volunteer!!!

Unfortunately for you, Jan, my only reasonable recourse here is this: I must cause you to publicly make a complete fool out of yourself, not that you already haven’t. I must, in other words, make it official. I must force you to prove your positive accusation, which you can’t, so that my negative innocence remains unblemished by your fallacious, positive name-calling and accusatory rhetoric. In short, I must make you repent, retract, and apologize to myself and those you’ve poisoned by your fallacious, unchecked, un-veted rhetoric and name-calling in unwarranted, un-vetted judgement. So I demand you provide proof that my father and I are CIA. I would think your fans would demand it as well, along with proving all of the other 100’s of fallacious accusation you’ve made towards others, or perhaps they assume you just have a magic mirror and take your word for it?

Prove your claim and apologize when you can’t. Simple.

But the sociopath apologizes for nothing. It’s never the sociopaths fault, is it Jan?

You cannot simply point to your past research, which shows public information connections of historical figures to the CIA, and expect people to take that as some proof that your hysterical beliefs and rhetorical lies about all others are also therefore true. You must prove your claim, right? Isn’t that correct procedure under the Trivium model and the scientific method model? It certainly is a maxim of law. Another maxim is that I can’t prove a negative. Yet another is he that is accused does not bear the burden of proof. Innocence until proven guilty? Recognize any of these?

So whatcha gonna do, Jan?

Even the sociopathic personality would at least see that to save his own ass he must at least pretend remorse and issue a public retraction and apology. Either way I’ll take it. But that’s not enough, Jan. For I am also here as an advocate for everyone else you’ve fallaciously labeled and mentally abused. Prove those too. Show your listeners that the entire universe except your supporters are a band of trolls, that all of those who criticize (or laugh uncontrollably) you and your “Trivium as God” religion are in fact a combination, a conspiratorial paid force out to get you. Your self-righteousness is astounding.

After a few months of reflection now, I realize that you have presented me with the perfect opportunity to teach you an extremely needed and deserved lesson in humility — one that you may learn from and hopefully improve yourself for the benefit of yourself and your listenership, whom in my opinion you have a duty and responsibility to as an somewhat influential public speaker and researcher. Indeed, this type of chance to improve and assist you in such endeavors through public embarrassment and well-deserved ridicule doesn’t often present itself in such a perfect fashion. But that’s what friends do for each other, no matter how painful it is in the short term. And so I am going to jump on this opportunity in the only rational, reasonable, and moral fashion it allows me to. To this end, and in the spirit of your own Trivium-based requirements, I hereby challenge you to PROVE YOUR CLAIM!

I challenge you to protect your own reputation and name by proving your nonsensical accusations, not merely about myself but all the others you have used and abused. Show me the evidence. Show everyone the evidence publicly. Prove your claims directed at my father and about myself. If my father was CIA, I certainly want to know about it. And if I am CIA or for that matter anything at all related to some government agency, I want to start getting paid for it, dude, let alone be told what the hell my mission is. Find a single pay-stub! In considering the fact that you suddenly terminated our friendship and professional relationship of more than 8 years over this fantasy you’ve convinced yourself of, that I am an “agent” because my father was (maybe) an “agent” and that I am out to get you like most of your past used and abused acquaintances — you know, all the others you’ve decided it to be a good idea to take a big shit on their foreheads as well — I simply ask you for the proof. Where is it? How can I find it? Where can your listening audience acquire it?

You even had me believing all these guests, friends, and colleagues you’ve thrown under the bus in the past must be part of the evil they. Apparently, the whole of the CIA is after you, Jan, and just about the whole of anyone that speaks critically of your work is as well. According to your crazy-pants rhetoric, by default we all must be CIA or just generically “dirty.” We must be a band of trolls from Trogloditaria. So go now and let me know what my dirt as an agent is, where my agency employment records are, and indeed post publicly when you find any connection between myself or my father to the CIA or any other government or non-governmental agency. I demand it. That’s all I need, since by default I must therefore be CIA if my father was, right? Isn’t that your fallacious logic, even though your sought-after colleague Dave McGowan, who exposed much of this military family information, clearly warned against making such fallacious connections as you have, as if everyone in the military is part of them? My father might have been a willfully ignorant man that loved old war movies and who was overly proud of his military title and actions thereof, as most are, but he was certainly not a part of the intelligence apparatus you have imagined. He was in the third seat of the planes he navigated. I may not be proud of his “service” but I will defend his good nature and name to my death, you piece of shit.

You want to know how ridiculous this is, Jan? I’ll bet all the money I have (which ain’t much) that you don’t even know my father’s first name. I bet you have no information on him whatsoever. I bet you are completely clueless in this regard, but for the few purposely misinterpreted words you heard me say on my show. And yet you have the audacity, the paranoid-schizophrenic gumption and untethered pathologic confidence to say he was an agent for the CIA with such careless abandon? You don’t even have his first name!

What really gets my goat is that you didn’t come to me as a friend and colleague to ask me the truth. You simply assumed it was true. You accused me without trial, without evidence, all based on the story of my father I’ve told multiple times over the years. But for you, it was the first time you heard it; the quick, redacted version I stated this time around. And so your blind followers and financial supporters will consider my name the same as you, not just about myself and my father, but everyone else you’ve spit out of the Gnostic Media shit can like two-hour-old gum. And that is why I’m putting this open letter up, so that everyone might see what you really are, and to stop this veritable witch-hunt led by the paranoid man that cries witch every time someone disagrees with him.

And if I am wrong, and you find such records, I will publicly apologize to you as well. To those on the sidelines, unless this has happened to you as well, you may have no idea how frustrating it is to be accused of something you are not, having no way to disprove it, knowing how utterly ridiculous and unprovable that accusation is. Jan Irvin is a divider, not a uniter. We couldn’t be more different in this regard, and our unique rhetoric shows this well.

With regards to the facts, that’s really all your listening audience should be demanding. In triplicate. Your rhetoric is so loose with regards to people’s name and reputation that it’s hard to believe you have any legitimate audience left. Show me the evidence not just on Clint, but on every single victim of your long chain of accusations and dismissals. The road behind you is particularly bloody. Why did you throw poor Jacob D under the bus? What did he do? Where’s your scoop on Joe Atwill? I may disagree with him, but I don’t openly accuse him of that which I cannot prove just to make myself look better. However, thanks to your influence, I certainly have in the past tended to agree with your assessments of folks as if under Stockholm Syndrome. And to those I may have made any agreeably false accusations because of Jan’s influence, I humbly apologize. We’ve all got to break this snake’s influence and that of others like him to start acting like a united family, because the false brotherhoods we are fighting always remain as brotherhoods, from the freemason to the Jew to the Jesuit, no matter how much they disagree. That is their power. It must become ours as well. And the Truth is the only bond we have left, for the brotherhoods have taken everything else.

Jan, of all the people you have accused of this fallacious connection or employment to the CIA or whatever alphabet code team you have dreamed up, please provide even a modicum of proof regarding myself. Just a little? Please? Anything? Bueller? Bueller?

Chirp… Chirp…

Secondly, I simply and reasonably demand that, since I know you won’t find a damn thing on myself, you must therefore by all standards of decency, morality, and ethics publicly apologize for blatantly lying and character assassinating my name. Just because someone disagrees with you and has evidence to back it up doesn’t mean they work for a government agency nor that they are evil or “satanic” in some way only you, the Great Irvin, delusionist extraordinaire can fathom.

Let’s put another lie of yours to your favorite, promoted, but rarely used Trivium logic test:

How many times and for how many years can you continue to espouse that the CIA or other agency, or perhaps organized trolls or evil leprechauns after your precious gold and raw green coffee beans are trying to shut down your website? I call bullshit, Jan. Show me the proof, Mr. I.T. guy. Essentially, if we examine this claim in its full spectrum, you are trying to pass as truth the fact that the CIA, the NSA, and the rest of the organizational apparatus of the military industrial complex is too inept to shut down your tiny little website, but that they gave it their best shot? LOL! I know you need donations, but does anyone actually believe that if the CIA wanted you dead or your websites and transmissions terminated that it wouldn’t happen by the end of government business hours today, Eastern timezone? Where do these grand delusions come from? After all, whole countries can’t keep the CIA out, let alone you and your unguarded mountain chalet. And don’t you ever stop to consider how ridiculous this notion is? That is what you are indirectly claiming, right, that they are so inept that they can’t break through your intensive countermeasures to kill and erase Gnostic Media? Just who do you think actually believes that? Wow, Jan, you must be some computer wiz to stand so bravely against the entirety of the powers that be, against the entire AI, and against military intelligence itself! Yours is a modern retelling of David vs. Goliath? No paranoia here, right? No logical fallacy? That wasn’t just an unexpected power outage for the entire 3-city grid, right, but was instead a direct attack on the Jan Irvin and Gnostic Media machine so that you couldn’t perform your scheduled podcast of a radio show for one night? LOL!

Gee Jan, you better not board an airplane, or they might shoot it down, willingly sacrificing the other 150 passengers just to shut up the great and powerful Jan “the Oz” Irvin.

Show us the proof. Show us the matrix code. Show us the cyber attacks. Because they seem to happen randomly to everyone else, too. Oh shit, I think they are making it rain right now. They must be controlling the weather so that I stay inside and write this letter to you.

You see, that’s the brilliant part about your particular brand of seemingly scripted, ridiculously demented paranoia. We out here in the digital wasteland cannot prove the negative on this either. We cannot prove that the CIA in cooperation with the Leprechaun Rainbow Liberation Army (LRLA) and the Jews Out To Get Jan Irvin (JOTGJI) and all the other alphabet agencies known and unknown isn’t every day trying to put static upon your airwaves or hacking into your websites to cause gremlin-like digital havoc. Entertaining and even false sympathy-causing as these thoughts are, I still smell a big pile of bullshit, Jan. If they wanted you or your website disappeared, I’d be writing an obituary instead of an open-letter critique from a pointlessly wounded friend and former supporter.

But I can’t support what you’ve become, which I can see is really just what you always have been, now that I’ve taken my rose-colored glasses off.

You have since created an even greater logical fallacy than I had first described in my original critique of the so-called Trivium and its misuse, linked here for posterity:

This time you are not merely using the Trivium in name only, as a supposedly unbeatable credential, that you “have the trivium and therefore you are correct.” No, at this point you’ve mastered the deflective use of any and all logical fallacies. You’ve learned to wear these fallacies like a badge of courage, like Wonder Woman brandishes her invulnerable bracelets. But your golden lasso is made of strung-together turds, causing people not to speak the truth but to accept your lies as truth, for any disagreement or evidence against you is magically, alchemically transformed into a personal attack against you. You’ve made yourself into a walking strawman, no longer arguing in the first person, no longer relegating anything of reality or that would require any personal responsibility to your actual self, for only the strawman appears now, same pig, different lipstick. You are no longer Jan Irvin, but the strange simulation of your self, a simulacrum (copy without an original). Your persona (mask) is now turned transparent. You’ve become your own martyr, your own hero in your own story, in a complete and utter transference — the fruition of a narcissists’ dream.

To be clear, though anyone’s comment or question will be genuine and attacking the argument, not the messenger (you), in what you espouse to be proper rhetoric based on grammar and logical conclusion, you have seemed to master the art of fallaciously changing every comment or question into a personal attack. You’ve built a strawman argument in and of yourself. It’s like reverse discrimination, but in this case, you’ve entered into a state of perpetual reverse ad hominem, where we, they, and them are all against you simply for challenging your rhetoric (argument and/or sources, or lack thereof). In other words, you take what is correct according to your own precious Trivium method and somehow transform it into an ad hominem. This is interestingly the reverse of the ad hominem fallacy, again like reverse discrimination. To take a disputed fact personally would be to pretend the speaker to be insulting you to avoid having to answer for the ineptness of your own original argument. You’ve created another new fallacy, Jan! You pretend everything is an attack on you by the CIA, someone “dirty,” or a “troll” (or basically anyone that disagrees or challenges you to prove your rhetoric), and that way you don’t ever have to answer for the continuous hairball of fallacious reasoning you perpetually cough up and call it “the Trivium.”

Or are you just calling it god now?

That all said, I have always had a great but in hindsight blind respect for the few in depth research projects you have done, just not your rhetoric. Frankly, you suck on radio as a host, interrupting your guests every two minutes because you can’t help but mention the few names you’ve researched like Gordon Wasson or the Huxley family and their exploits, as if everything is connected through those names through the CIA. After all, the brain software says so, right? There are no other options, no other players but what you’ve uncovered. And this is the epitome of why the Trivum method is flawed. It is only as good as its users total knowledge, the total grammar intake and storage. And as we will cover below, you lie continuously about how much grammar you have actually absorbed.

And what is worse, you connect all of this public information in that digital program called “the brain,” apparently so that you don’t have to use your own. Yet if we were to look fairly and critically at your so-called “brain” data file, we can see nothing more and nothing less than exactly what is portrayed in Hollywood movies and television shows — a depiction of the consummate, popular caste roll of the paranoid conspiracy theorist, with pinned up pictures and newspaper clippings connected by variously colored strings blazoned across the room from wall to wall, like a spider spinning its pointless but artful web while tripping on acid — something you’ve done according to your own words hundreds of times. But the effects are temporary, right Jan? Are they? Hmmm… Maybe in your acid dreams.

Here are some wise words and ponderable questions you might wish to consider:

–=–

–=–

Your “brain” program is not open-minded, but stands as a barrier to all other knowledge. It excludes further pieces of any puzzle until its user selectively enters those pieces into its database. Your “brain” has no knowledge, Jan, only data. So essentially, your brain cannot be used according to your rules of the Trivium method, though it’s the perfect tool for a narcissist. Your brain program is merely the trans-humanist, computer model of your own limited mind, minus the crazy, and you consort with it continuously to verify your own brain’s accuracy. In other words, you have become trapped in the circular, limited computer version of your own noggin. You ask your own brain questions, and it answers them to the best of its ability, which is limited to your own inputed information.

One might call this a paradox. Another might say it’s the magic mirror telling its user its reflection is the fairest in all the land… except for your next target. How can your brain grow if you don’t connect more dots, more conspirators against Jan Irvin, against the Trivium as religion? And so you commence in connecting more dots by making them appear in your “brain” from nothingness, with nothing as a source but your own conspiratorial modeling and descriptions.

It prevents you from thinking outside of the limitations of its virtual box, until the time where you input any new, always incomplete data you’ve discovered. Its data can never be complete, meaning it can never have correct grammar, meaning it is completely against the Trivium model. And so are you, without realizing it. You’ve become so much like your brain software that, like that non-human computer interface, you cannot distinguish between what is real and what is artificial, what is truth and what is lies. It is inclusive and it is exclusive, acting like a schizophrenic revolving door. It compliments your tortured mind and organizes your theories on conspiracy for you. It tells you exactly what you want to hear, because you programmed it. It’s what you would call an extremely limited hangout, a never-concluding and ultimately useless tool except to a mass-murderer or a vengeance-filled vigilante.

It fits right in with your fallacious worship of the Trivium as the source of the Bible. LOL! If I asked what you intend to ultimately do with your forever incomplete brain database, I’m sure your answer would ultimately amount to a fancy way of saying bragging rights, to say I told you so. It’s not primary evidence, it has no chain of custody, and so it’s about as valuable in court or to an FBI agent’s dossier as a second-hand youtube video accusing George Bush Jr. of pushing the red button to commence the events of 9-11-2001.

But great job man. Way to use your– or ah, the computers… “brain.”

This is Jan’s Brain file. This is Jan’s Brain file after years of Jan doing drugs.

Any questions?

So here’s your chance to vindicate yourself, Jan, for what it’s worth. Just put me into your brain! Not the fucked up one dangling upon your shoulders, but the supposedly researched one on your computer. You know, the one people can download if you ignore the malware warnings of a “compression bomb,” in case they don’t mind an incredible array of malicious spy and mal-ware?

Talk about narcism – I’m Jan Irvin. Please download my self-programmed brain, so that you can stop being inferior to me and start thinking like I do. LOL!

Your life has become the manifestation of an Escher masterpiece:

But let us hit the nail squarely on the head before we continue here…

One comment I heard lately regarding your online presence and personality dis-order was shockingly accurate in its descriptiveness of your behavior-isms, and so I would like to offer here a comparative analysis of that armchair diagnosis to see if it might be relevant to your particular disposition, Jan. The more anyone knows you, the more of these traits ring true.

I defer here to an external link for this purpose, where I have placed in bold the traits that seem to fit your actions, and highlighted in red those that are quite evident in your personality… those that fit like a glove:

People with narcissism are characterized by their excessive and persistent need for others’ admiration and positive reinforcement. They generally have grandiose opinions of themselves and believe they are superior to other people. Narcissists are also frequently convinced that they are above the normal responsibilities and obligations of everyday life, so they usually have significant difficulties maintaining employment or relationships as a result.

The narcissistic sociopath has this type of personality along with a noticeable lack of regard for the rights of others and a tendency to regularly violate those rights.

One noted difference between a narcissistic sociopath and people with narcissism alone is that:

The narcissist with the sociopathy reacts strongly and sometimes even violently to negative feedback. True sociopaths generally do not respond to criticism or care what others may think of them.

A narcissistic sociopath is unable to tolerate criticism and needs constant praise, as well as deference from other people. Many with this condition present themselves in the best light possible and are able to easily charm others to gain their trust.

—

THE MALIGNANT PERSONALITY:

These people are mentally ill and extremely dangerous! The following precautions will help to protect you from the destructive acts of which they are capable. To recognize them, keep the following guidelines in mind:

(1) They are habitual liars. They seem incapable of either knowing or telling the truth about anything.

(2) They are egotistical to the point of narcissism.They really believe they are set apart from the rest of humanity by some special grace.

(3) They scapegoat;they are incapable of either having the insight or willingness to accept responsibility for anything they do.Whatever the problem,it is always someone else’s fault.

(4) They are remorselessly vindictive when thwarted or exposed.

(5) Genuine religious, moral, or other valuesplay no part in their lives.They have no empathy for others and are capable of violence. Under older psychological terminology, they fall into the category of psychopath or sociopath, but unlike the typical psychopath,their behavior is masked by a superficial social facade.

Manipulative and Cunning – They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used.They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

Grandiose Sense of Self – Feels entitled to certain things as “their right.” May state readily that their goal is to rule the world.

Pathological Lying – Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.

Not concerned about wrecking others’ lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

A Sociopath is always “pitting” people against each other.My Sociopath

Smear Campaign:A Sociopath will always be smearing someone and inciting people against each other.Sociopaths do not want people to like or get along with each other and will try to “divide and conquer.” They will say odd things to people in the social group: “She doesn’t like you” or “She doesn’t want me doing anything with you.” My Sociopath

Sociopath has a strange network of Support People ranging from “consultants,”to skilled-workers, to enabling co-dependents that back him up when he wants to go after his Target. Most of the Support People have their own Psychological problems. My Sociopath

No conscience. Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt.

Believe they are all-powerful all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their impact on others.

The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

Shallow Emotions: When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive.Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

Incapable of real human attachment to another.

Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them.

Authoritarian

Secretive

Paranoid

Callousness/Lack of Empathy

Drama King:There is always conflict going on in a Sociopath’s life and it involves a “bad person,” “bad business”or “bad transaction.” My Sociopath.

There currently is no form of psychotherapy that works with those with antisocial personality disorder, as those with this disorder have no desire to change themselves,which is a prerequisite.

Over time, she says, “their appearance of perfection will begin to crack,” but by that time you will have been emotionally and perhaps financially scathed.

Taken in part from MW — By Caroline Konrad — September 1999

—

Holy crap! If the shoe fits! My God, man. Mamma always said don’t go pokin’ a sociopath while its basking in its own narcissistic glory, but how can I resist? So you aren’t just a dick on purpose, but instead likely suffer from a grandiose mental illness? Being a dick to you is like having the uncontrollable Tourettes Syndrome, isn’t it? Because honestly, reading this list is like reading the introduction section of the Jan Irvin behavioral handbook 101 — subtitled as: how to use and be a complete dick to everyone and still get donations!

How did I not see this before? We are diametrically opposed, complete opposites. Yet it is said opposites attract. Perhaps that explains the repulsion I experienced when we actually met in person (described below). And indeed, as we all can see and as many have experienced first hand, you treat your audience as a “strange network” – enabling co-dependents that back {you} up when {you} want to go after {your} Target. Examples of this behavior are listed below as well.

To be fair, I can’t just state this general diagnosis outright here and attempt to apply it to you without giving the personal examples (proofs) that cause me to presume it applies to you, now can I? I don’t wish to attack you, only to liberate my conscious of all the dirty little secrets and discussing behaviors I’ve witnessed and kept about you all this time. But that’s what victims do, now isn’t it? For victims of the sociopath confuse what they believe to be friendship with what is actually victimhood. But suddenly, victims are finding a friendly ear, a friendly world to their victimhood, and they are coming out against people exactly like you.

Now, I wouldn’t want to be accused of dipping into any of that classic circular logic pattern of excuses from the Jan Irvin logical fallacy library. Oh, you’ll try to call it just that, I’m sure, as if anything I’ve said so far isn’t true. You’ll say this is a “hit piece” by an “agent” or “troll.” Yada yada yada. How about calling it exactly what it is, the truth? But alas, as we now know, the sociopath takes no personal responsibility. I get it. Thus any apology would be malcontent and only for show anyway. Of course the sociopath can do no wrong, and you’ve certainly denied events I’ve described between us before without even a glimmer of remorse (perhaps because you were too stoned to remember or care), have never taken the blame for anything, never apologized for being a dick or other colorful metaphors, and finally decided it was time to deliver me as your latest victim of a sociopathic smear campaign you believed would protect your narcissistic nature and cause you to look like, yet again, the Great Irvin standing morally tall above the rest.

It all makes a certain sick sense now…

But what you may not understand yet, Jan, is that this open letter is not a smear campaign, and does not require whatever ridiculous, fallacious response and defense you might attempt to post. No, this letter is not for your benefit or even an attack against you, but is being written for the benefit of the rest of your victimized audience, who generally have no idea how you use and abuse them, asking them as your “strange network of supporters” to find “dirt” and do “hatchet jobs” on those you’ve chosen to degrade and throw under the bus in order to make you look like some kind of hero or moral authority. What a wicked scheme you have going on here. Someone needs to expose it for what it is, and you inadvertently chose me to do it when you threw me away like a used condom, and even more so when you chose to disrespect the honor of my father, my family. We are all your victims in one way or the other. And we must worship you and ignore your shortcomings (and they’re all short) if we don’t want to be voted off the island. We must either become and act like you or be accused of being the opposite. For you, your latest attack word satanic only means anti-Jan Irvin.

Your perfect little public facade is indeed cracking Jan, judging by the number of blatantly open critiques, forums, emails, and outright no holds barred detractions and WTF’s directed towards your latest rhetoric. Like those Hollywood tramps that are at least pretending to be victims instead of willing participants, I feel a bit late coming out and telling my own story of your exploits in narcissistic sociopathy towards myself and others. But it’s a story that must be told, for your future exploits, trials, and public ostracizing of innocent people must be warned against, as must what may happen to them when they put their trust in you. Like the grand inquisitor heading a witch hunt, we users of brooms to sweep the floors must look out for one another, lest our brooms be said by you to have secret, government issued license plates with hidden agendas, as the whole of all broom owners in the world organize into covens so as to plan our next trolling of the implacable Jan Irvin. We must get his goat at all costs. We must spend our entire lives polluting his email, his comment section, his forums, and his website, or else our central intelligence coven (CIC) might be discovered. We really have nothing else to do, anyway. You might discover some easy-to-find public quote of ours from a blog stating our mutual connections and then claim to have found it occulted in some obscure journal only Jan Irvin and his “brain” could possibly find. And then you might talk about it or write about it, just like Alex Jones, never ever doing anything about it except exposing our brilliant but non-existent plans and how they are working to destroy not only America, but more importantly the Jan Irvin empire, if a website and radio show could be somehow considered as an empire. Yes, exposure without consequence or action… we in the government clandestine operations can’t have that now can we?

Oh wait, isn’t that our whole purpose, to let people like you expose us without consequence? Now I’m confused. Remember the dialectic (logic)… problem, reaction, solution. You don’t even contemplate that you are not their problem but their solution, do you Jan?

Well gee, maybe that’s a good thing after all. Maybe we let Irvin expose our CIA agenda with no other purpose than to incessantly talk about it with no intention of doing anything about it? That was the underlying theme of the very first episode of the show Black Mirror, wasn’t it? Hell, Jan, what is it that you think they are actually worried about with you anyway? What have you actually done? I mean honestly, you’ve had about as much effect on the CIA and its clandestine operations as a nature photographer has on an antelope being chased down and devoured by a pack of hyenas. Your essays are nothing more than a time-exposure videography of what has already happened, and they read like watching the grass grow. You’ve done nothing but over-expose the picture, which, while it created a novel, unique piece of art, sits dormant as the useless information it is. You are a passive observer at best, and an annoying master of the I told youso parrot call so at worse. Sure, everything you do and write has the appearance of being impressive. But, like a fishbowl, your work serves no purpose except to support the life of the fish. Your work is on its own life support system. If people lose interest, realizing there is nothing they can actually do with such useless information, that it holds or supports no actual substance, then the fishbowl no longer has a reason to exist. Like a fiction novel, what you’ve reported only serves to help the very agencies and personas you are supposedly exposing, placing them as nothing more than histories past, present, and future untouchables.

But let’s get back to your narcissistic sociopathy, shall we?

Here it goes, and this is but a partial list of your questionable behavior over the years that I remained silent and protective of, a case of classic Stockholm Syndrome…. I share these factual events not as slander, not as an attack, not as revenge or malice, but simply because I cannot prove the negative you threw at me. I am left no choice.

Hashtag: Hey Jan, you screwed with the wrong guy this time!

Firstly, and most importantly to this whole circle of events, in what was either another paranoid, bullshit story or what I thought to be a true one (who knows at this point), you told both myself and one of your other guests named Jacob Deullman on a three-way Skype call quite seriously and glibly and in great detail, that you were personally visited by an “old acquaintance” from high school that is now forced to do occasional odd jobs for the CIA, as would you be if you accept the offer that they would soon propose. You stated that he told you right before all this craziness happened with me and the advent of all this new strange behavior from you that you should “take the money” that will be soon offered to you when it is indeed offered, that the mysterious they of the CIA were going to essentially make you an offer you apparently cannot refuse, and that they would harass, harm, or kill you and your family/friends if you did not take that forthcoming but yet unrealized monetary offer. Thank God I have a fellow witness to this Skype exchange, as you seem to relish in the denial of such true events. You then assigned both myself and Jacob to secrecy of these facts, which again I obeyed like a little bitch. I even recommended you do something constructive with it or demand private land instead of money so you can help others in transition, those that need help getting out of the system, if that was indeed your choice in the end. No use putting your family in danger. In other words, out of concern for your well-being, never even considering you might be lying or just bat-shit crazy, I bit at your story like a hungry fish, feeling important enough to be entrusted with the secret and yet overtly concerned for what I thought was a friend — the perfect recipe for your brand of fallacious, narcisistic sociopathy to breed. If this was or is a true, continuing story, and not just another fallacious fable falling under the everyone’s-out-to-get-Jan-Irvin column, then what are we to think about your sudden rampage and ultra-strange religious turn since then, which is causing many to question your reputation and word, even in essay and posted formats? Because if you aren’t trying to destroy your reputation and remove yourself as any kind of serious researcher, just as they were by your words instructing you to do, you are certainly doing a good job of it anyway. What am I to think of how you’ve inexplicably and without proof accused myself and my family of being a CIA crime syndicate — guilt by a familial association you cannot even prove? Or is that just business as usual for the sociopathic narcissist? One would surmise, if one were to be so bold and be victimized suddenly and without warning as I and others recently have been by you, those of us who put their trust into you and your Godless religion of the Trivium Trinity (LOL!), that it was in fact you that were bought and paid for by your pretended rogue, nemesis agencies in government. Did you take the offer as you described it to us? This alone places you on a serious hot seat, and should cause all your “fans” that love to get their fair share of abuse from your podcast, comments, and emails to step back and consider just who you are working for? I’ll keep your secrets no more. I’ll not be your victim, and by exposing this I hope others will avoid putting blind faith in your multi-sided, unpredictable, eruptive drama mask. #Timesup dick.

Speaking of your sudden religious tomfoolery with seemingly no feeling, substance, or spirituality behind it, I’m sure I have the same question as everyone else… that being WTF? You took my many years of deep study and language comprehension and basically took a giant Gnostic shit on it. Thanks for that, by the way, dick. I offered you and your listeners the Truth and understanding of the Bible as the foundation of common law and you have completely twisted and turned it into the religion of the Trivium. The Trivium is not God, Jan. Nor is Logos. Logos is man’s conception of God, not God. To say that Logos is God is like saying a gun (instrument) killed someone, not the man wielding it (Source). Seriously, look it up like a primary researcher should. See how that word is used in the Bible. And please, get this through your head — the Bible is NOT the Trivium. LOL! The Trivium doesn’t exist, dude. It is not of God (Nature/Truth) but of man (invention), nor is language, nor numbers, nor does anything True need the Trivium to prove it actually (negatively) exists. Your use of the Trivium as a weapon, as a blanket proof that since you have or use the Trivium, bearing it like a superhero emblem, you are therefore correct is complete nonsense. I call it the ultimate fallacy, the fallacy of all fallacies, that I have the Trivium therefore I am right. For you, the Trivium is a disease, and you certainly have it in that regard. But the sociopath cares not nor is willing to admit that his limited grammar is the very foundation of his rhetoric, and that his rhetoric can indeed only reflect the very limited resources available to him. I’ll give you credit for reading .001% of all information and books out there, but to base your whole conscious awareness on those extremely limited sources, many designed to deceive, most probably written or translated into vulgar (common) English… well, only a sociopath would believe such a limited set of grammar is enough to spout the bullshit you do. And don’t get me started on your Tartary crap. You’ve turned this tool of art into the religion of Jan, JanIrvinanity, no different than it has been used for centuries as such by the lawyer, scribe, Pharisee class. It is completely at odds with the scriptures, not in harmony with the Law of Nature, and the Bible refers to your precious logic as it should, as a dialectic. A trap. When your logic is based on bullshit, when your grammar is limited, then so too shall your rhetoric stink of said shit. Sorry, but logic has been the ruin of societies dating back to the Chinese dynasties. Logicians are legalists! You are missing in so many ways the spiritual, moral balance required to be a user of any such system of logic. Logic is not Natural Reasoning, but actions and rhetoric based on information created by men. There is no Trivium to be found in Nature, in Source, only in man’s sorcery and prestige (trickery). You are a victim of the collective enema of the works of men’s fictions and musings, trying to use and apply that fiction to the scriptural books of Truth and Nature’s Law. It just ain’t going to happen, Jan. And by the way, I just read the directions for the Trivium board game and it said no sociopaths should be allowed to play, lest horrible consequences follow. Sorry.

You have made completely un-foundational and shamelessly sourceless claims against not only myself but my father, a decorated navigator in the Air Force, whom some years ago was buried with honors as a retired Captain from the military, and whom incidentally suffered horrific and disabling health issues due to the poisoning of Monsanto’s “Agent Orange” sprayed in Vietnam, etc., and for which he eventually received full, 100% medical coverage from the Veterans Administration, as many vets have due to activists both in and out of my family that helped others obtain that full coverage. You have accused him of working as an agent for the CIA, just as you do anyone that disagrees or challenges any of your work, and have subsequently made the completely logical fallacy of guilt by association (family) by claiming the same about myself. HEY ASSHOLE, THE CIA POISONED MY FATHER!!! It is public knowledge at this point that they used contracted military men, took their dog-tags away, and left them there to die when they went missing, because this was not even close to a legitimate war but was an illegitimate (legal) Executive operation. They even told families those missing in action were presumed dead, but we don’t know or can’t tell you where. To say he joined and was a member of the CIA and not a victim of its clandestine operations through Executive military cooperation is preposterous, and belittles every other man that was tricked, drugged, experimented on, and left to die in the jungle so as to keep plausible deniability. You fuck! And all these outrageous accusations just happened to occur after you were supposedly approached by the CIA with money to quit your research. Did they pay you to take us all with you? Is that what you had to do to get your new trophy wife? Will you get a puppy if you can take down more than 10 legitimate researchers? As your future ex-wife, I’m sure she will have lots to tell, especially if you ever turn back over to the light side. But this last part is just sarcastic speculation — not even my own, mind you, but of others you’ve harmed.

Afterwords, in stead of telling the truth and stating that I (Clint) compared your research to the flat-earth (specifically the ‘Universal Zetetic Society‘) mentality on my last show (yes, I quit radio because of you, you dick), as appearance-based science instead of methodical, you told your listeners instead that “the CIA played the flat-earth card.” You dishonor my Christian (first) name, my intent, and my actions through this outright lie, being unprovable in any way. If this is not fallacious I don’t know what is? I think the CIA is happy to have you. I think you are doing it an unnecessary service, feigning to be its adversary while sitting on your ass doing nothing but continuously lying to people to sell books and get donations. Hell, on your last show you even charged people to ask you questions? Talk about willing victims. I can’t even imagine doing this, but then I’m not narcissistic. All my time, my effort, my shows, my books, and my blogs are free. What I do to try and help other people you do to feather your own nest. Opposites really do, apparently, attract.

You have taken to now calling me publicly and on your most recent shows by words and false titles like “dirty,” with the implication being that I work for some alphabet agency or other group that is, surprise, out to get you (LOL!), though you’ve given absolutely no reference or proof to what the source of that so-called “dirt” is. In other words, by using these empty descriptions of false flattering titles in a completely logical fallacy-based mode, knowing they can neither bear the burden of positive proof nor be proven as a negative (as a bullshit, purely personal ad hominem attack and lie), you have now caused others to believe, as you say, my well is poisoned just because Jan says so. No proof, no reasoning, just that crazy Trivum logic. Way uncool, man. I am not alone in this, of course, as you seem to throw many of your former guests under the bus in like fashion, often for no apparent reason. Some people even keep track of your legacy of throw-away acquaintances, like a day at the races. Some of us victims have even contacted one another after the fact and joked that we need to form a support group for the victims of Jan Irvin’s fallacious name-calling and insulting rhetoric, those of us inexplicably torn asunder without cause, without proof, and without comprehension of why?

You fool! You made the grave mistake of contacting some of my close friends and readers/listeners, including the incontrovertibly indelible Drew in Canada, in order to help you find “dirt” as a smear campaign on myself and other guests, including a search of Canadian records to try and find pedophilia records for one of your past guests I won’t mention. Deny all you want, we have the emails. This good friend of mine, this charitable salt of the earth up in Canada, actually had to block your emails when he refused to continue cooperating with what I now comprehend as your narcissistically sociopathic, vengeful witch-hunt behavior, after you then referred to him as a follower of satan and engaged him in other outrageously ridiculous name-calling and harassment. All this because he wouldn’t help you try to frame another guest, or find some fallacious connection to yet again destroy the character, not the argument? You must be crazy to try and turn my friends against me as if they believe your fallaciously ill-conceived implications about my character. Or, as the diagnosis fits above, you seem to be narsacistically sociopathic by trying to divide and conquer. Congratulations, Jan, because honestly I’ve never heard of a listener, let alone a group of listeners, having to block a host for harassment and fallacious name-calling! I think you are the first, and Drew will no doubt not be the last to block your attempts at Trivium-based, religo-cyber-bullying. In February, you apparently had already begun a well-orchestrated smear campaign against me, and I only found out recently that you have been dropping your copied and pasted Gnostic shit-piles about me in anyone’s inbox you can, though none of them asked for it. Here is an example from a sweet lady that I went to visit a couple of times in my hometown of Sacramento, to which you carelessly and apparently without forethought didn’t consider she’d eventually share it with me, even after she told you we were friends. Yeah, I must be CIA if I go around having secret lunch meetings 60 year old ladies, you fucking idiot. While I won’t include some of the vulgarities you sent, here are some quotes from that email, the shit you’ve been flinging behind my back to anyone that will listen:

Jan:

—These disinfo agents always expose themselves.

–Thanks for the heads up.

–Ps. Clint Richardson went dark path too. He’s dirty AF.

(reply) –Jan… your final statement has me reeling….why do you say Clint is dirty? I’ve met him, had lunches with him…

Jan:

“RE Clint, did you hear his last show attacking me and the trivium and scaliger and Tartary and calling me a Satanist and all else? All coordinated with Miles Mathis’s attack!!!! Hmmm…

I figured out that he’s a homosexual (Left hand path) and misleading people with his version of Christianity…

The Book of Mormon makes clear that homosexuals are always behind conspiracy… (key unrelated verse)

Due to the shows with ClintI went in and decided read the Bible, Book of Mormon, and Qur’an myself. All I can say is… wow is Clint full of shit. I read after reading the Bible MYSELF, I realized it was TRUE and repented and became a Christian last Autumn.

Furthermore reading the book of Mormon, I was astounded at all the natural law I found there, and mentioning it toBill and Clint, they both went apeshit and started attacking me and refused to read it. I actually suspect the who (two)were playing me behind the scenes.

Clint is a Satanist… a sort of grand wizard I think. His attack and spin on the trivium is highly revealing.

Clint has been harvesting souls so they don’t repent. I went into bad depression last week when I realized what he was doing and how dark he is…the rose on his book, the checkerboard, that artist… it’s all occult magic… the “Strawman” is what his book actually is (below)… by hiding all of these. There are many dozens of such citations in the Bible and Book of Mormon. There is NO WAY Clint could have confused accepting Christ with flattering titles of a judge, et al. It’s ridiculous. I think he was working with Mark Passio the entire time.He pretended to expose Mark to gain my trust.”

–=–

So where to begin here, Jan? How does one counter such fallacious rhetoric without delving into your own narcissistic sociopath model that would be required to even fathom such nonsense?

Well, let me put on my “grand wizard” hat for this one… LOL!

For my friends that were with me at the conference and whom shared in my own exposure of Mark Passio, which included you, Jan, no one can possibly believe such nonsense. You have the gaul to use my discovered information on his real name and what the word Passio actually means, and give me no credit now for your own usage of those facts. Typical sociopathy. This accusal is so ridiculous, so narcissistic and wildly conspiratorial and unprovable, that I cannot even fathom how to follow up on it. Yet again, there is no negative I can prove to counter your positively fallacious association of my name with known satanists, even ones that I exposed as still being such. So I won’t waste the effort here. If your fans, your strange network of supporting victims, are actually damaged enough by you to be able to accept such nonsensical, fallacious shit then you deserve each other. You are exactly what your victims (fans) need.

I attack your use and especially misuse of the Trivium, not the Trivium itself. I wouldn’t criticize a hammer for its misuse by its user. I criticize and stand firmly against your fallacious misuse of it and placement of it on a pedestal as that which is worthy of god-like worship that it is not even close to being qualified to stand upon, as I would a magistrate using his false authority to label anyone a witch or a priest a saint.

A criminal or a cardinal, they’re both frightened of angels (messengers). (–The Fixx)

Now let’s speak to your conversion from doper extraordinaire to so-called “Christian.” The first show we did on the Bible entitled “Red Pill Sunday School” was May 16, 2017. And yet you claim to have finally read the Bible yourself at the earliest then after this show — thus, not until the last half of 2017. The next show we did was actually already in “autumn,” on September 19, 2017, and there was no sign of Jan Irvin debating or doubting anything I had to say about the Bible, quite the opposite in fact. Our next show was in October, and again, no debate or sign of psychopathy. Yet in the above email you claim that during this time (not sure how or when) you were somehow able to have “repented and became a Christian” in “autumn” of 2017, which is of course between the months September and November. This adds up, as I would now expect, to be just another impossible lie. So you are claiming to have read the Bible and the Book of Mormon for the first time in, conservatively, less than two months, and suddenly became a Christian by such efforts? Oh, and let’s not forget the part where you say that you finally, actually “read the Bible yourself” just before autumn, 2017. Jan, you have been telling me you’ve read the Bible for years now, even pulling up your computer program to “prove” it. So here you expose yet another of your own lies, unable to keep track of them all on your twisted, ever-changing, demented timeline. You use the Bible like you use the Trivium, right? You have the Bible in possession and therefore you know it and can quote from it and are right? You have the Trivium and therefore you know whatever topic you discuss and are right? But now you admit you’ve never read the bible till late 2017? Liar – Liar – Pants on fire! I, of course, knew you hadn’t read it and still think you haven’t, because instead of speaking in its authority and words with confidence you simply prove you have possession of the Bible as a physical and digital, computer version with concordances and lexicons, and therefore magically, gnosticly possess its knowledge. What took Clint 5 years of full-time study only took Jan a couple of months! That’s incredible… and complete bullshit. I wonder if you actually read any books at all, or just collect them to say (prove) fallaciously that my library collection of books therefore proves I read? You obviously haven’t read my book, Jan, if only because I ask readers only to comment on it if they have read the full contents, which your comments make clear you have not. And the Bible? How many times can I say it, you just can’t read it in English (dog-Latin) without looking up the words in their Greek, Hebrew, and Latin (etc.) forms and origin of intention. Anyone that grows up speaking Greek as a first language, for instance, will tell you that Greek is not able to be properly translated into English, for English is a literal language and verse (poetry/metaphor/allegory) simply cannot be expressed properly in English. Yet you somehow mastered it in a matter of months. Wow! Impressive. You’re so psychotic at this point that you probably think you can enter the Bible characters into your brain program! I bet Moses was CIA for sure… And Jesus, totally controlled opposition, right? What you’ve revealed by your rhetoric is that you’ve embraced religion, not the Bible. Religion is not the Bible. Religion is usually opposed to the Bible.

Now, what can I possibly say about myself being satanic, since the darkly angelic Jan Irvin has now resorted to calling everyone that disagrees with him by this epitaph? Can’t prove a negative, so that’s out. Such slander is not just inexcusable but amazingly without any merit or understanding of the word itself whatsoever. You’ve actually found a way to fallaciously personify the word satanic, a word that simply means adversarial, into your narcissistic sociopathy and rhetoric. You’ve made your strawman persona (mask) with God-like qualities, so that the term satanic actually means opposed to Jan Irvin and his Trivium brand of fine logic. You basically accuse anyone and everyone now of being satanic if they don’t agree with your worldview and its digital brain feed. You’ve pulled this word right out of its proper usage in the Bible, as what is adversarial against Jehovah (Nature), and narcissistically applied it to yourself instead. I would certainly love to see any proof whatsoever that I’m working with Mark Passio and Bill Joslin, let alone some guy named Miles Mathis that I didn’t know existed till a month ago. Even your listeners questioned why you put myself and Bill Joslin together, as we were until then unaware of each other’s work? The sociopathic answer: to cause us to first become adversarial to each other and then at least one of us to become adversarial to yourself, because this sociopathic destruction and tearing apart of others is what feeds the entire machine you’ve built. Simply stated, you need adversaries to exist in your false persona, in the simulacra you’ve built up. But you know, as a registered soul harvester like me, it gets very hard to keep names with faces. A soul here and a soul there, everywhere a soul soul. It’s True, I’m only interested in each and every one of my listeners, my friends, my readers and my family’s best interest, that is, in the well-being of their souls. If that is harvesting souls, then I stand guilty as charged. LOL! Idiot.

Finally, we see the narcissistic sociopathic pattern emerge that I must be doing what I’m doing, even when exposing a satanist like “Passio” for what he is, I’m only doing it to gain Jan Irvin’s trust. Mirror, mirror on the wall… Everything’s about Jan, for Jan must appear in his digital podcaster reflection as being the fairest of them all. All others must be destroyed or made to appear less than Jan. We’re all out to get Jan, even if we don’t know it. If we appear fairer than Jan in any way, we must be sacrificed to the alter of Jan’s ego. Yeah, Jan, that’s become the whole reason why I take a shit too. I arrange the toilet paper in homage to your initials before I flush. You’re not the wind beneath my wings, dude. You are but a foul air permeating from already corrupt, spoiled airways.

Now we arrive at my apparent sexuality. How did you possibly “figure out” that I’m a homosexual? Well, that was certainly out of thin air! Was it a Trivium-based mathematical formula, or are you just being a dick again? Well, since I cannot prove a negative, for arguments sake let’s say its true. So I’m therefore responsible for and “behind all conspiracy,” that is, me and my fellow, organized homosexuals out there? The gay mafia? Ok, I’ll bite. After all, if the Book of Mormon says so by Jan’s interpretation, it must therefore be true, right, though the verse you pointed to in reference speaks of combinations (conspiricies) of men, not gay bars and nightclubs, you sociopathic idiot. Can this really be taken as anything but ad hominem, an attack on the messenger, or some other fallacious attack designed to steer the argument away from the subject? Are the CAFR reports I read, which are printed by government and independently audited somehow less authentic or less official because I might be one of the that man-on-man persuasion? Or indeed, is it that the entire auditing department of government part of the gay mafia? Or perhaps I’m wrong because I’m apparently homosexual, and therefore I’m behind whatever conspiracy or lie that is against (adversarial to) you by default? What fallacy is that, Jan? Choose your poison. But let’s go even further… what if, in fact, I’m actually bisexual, Jan? Does that mean I’m at least half right, half innocent, and really involved in only half of the conspiracies against you? Oh, I know, what if I’m just asexual, what would that mean? Does that surpass even the heterosexual persuasion, meaning that my research is somehow legitimate even more than 100% of the time? Would that make me even better or more right than you, oh master of male sexuality? Or perhaps you come up with this one just because you are a narcissist, that I participated in your shitty interviews because I wanted to bed you? For anyone actually interested, as my book is now printed and free to download, you may read my final word on the subject on page 491, which applies to all men (male and female) without exception and without fallacious name-calling. But more importantly, it seems your particular projection of fallacious reasoning here is that because you are heterosexual, you are therefore… what? Right? Righteous? Less of a dick? Qualified for angel-hood or heaven in the afterlife? On the “right” path? If you are suggesting some moral superiority, well then you’ll want to keep reading as I expose your own behavior towards the female of the species, one of the signs that I knew spelled we were absolutely not the same in any way, and that the pit that is your moral degradation had no limit (see next section). One last note: AIDS was a biological weapon introduced into the “homosexual” population of men through vaccinations only offered for free to gay men, claiming to prevent certain strains of Hepatitis. I found this in my vaccine research. So the homosexuals hate themselves, too, since they are behind all conspiracies, even the ones targeted to their own depopulation? And I suppose they are not allowed to marry ac other because of the homosexual conspirators as well, because it only makes sense that they would want to be banned from the social and civil rights of others? You have now bordered on the ridiculous in your spin. I’m flattered.

And now to the book, my book, which you are literally judging out loud by its cover. But when Jan Irvin does it, it’s not fallacy, right Jan? LOL! Yet again the logical fallacy rules over Jan Irvin’s reasoning and words without him even being aware of it – the rhetoric of a completely uninformed snitch (an oxymoron). The rose on my book, if you had read it, is indeed a secret symbol of the elite. Therefore, I must be an elite, right? The symbol is guilty as charged. But why is it used as such by the author, that is the question? The symbol of the rose generally means that secrets are kept beneath it, which is why you see it on government buildings, Masonic halls, old churches, the Queen’s monuments, Mormon Church buildings, etc. The art on my book instead displays the extending of that rose, as the revealing of the secrets hidden about the concept of a strawman and in the Law, both legal and scriptural. Actually, it’s quite neat. I’m proud of it and the artist. But in this fallacy, because I used a symbol from them I must be one of them. Well then, Jan, by this logic every time you quote Huxley or use the symbols as you do on your website and books, you must therefore also be one of them. Which they, I don’t know, because I don’t think that way. You see, Jan, as you know, which they doesn’t matter to the construction of your sociopathic, narcissistic fallacies, only that they must be believed to exist and that I used one of their symbols. Never mind that I used it against them and their intentions, as the opposite of what they use it for, which is to keep secrets. You have of course used this fallacy on your other guests too, and said as much about Jordon Maxwell, Joe Atwill, and others. But then, we all apparently are working together to thwart your work, right Jan, so in your mind it makes perfect sense? That’s what you have been saying like a bumbling fool. You are the only one actually guilty of your own accusation, as is often the case. We all tried to work with you, and you not only turned us against you but against each other! But then that is the recipe for sociopathy as I comprehend it. Oh, and the symbol for christ, the fish, which is visibly floating over the checkerboard without touching it — that’s a symbolic symbol of christ walking on water (the sea of commerce/legality), unlike those pawns that represent you and me. The checkerboard is jurisdiction, of which the free man under the Law of Nature (Law of God) has no attachment, like the floating fish (example of Christ). Again, you could have asked. But instead, you choose to create vast conspiracies in your messed up “brain.” Oh, and the artist himself is a struggling comic/graphic novelist that wants to do good with his work just as I did, the reason I quit Hollywood, and who decided to help me without fee. He was indeed a Godsend, not a devil, you asshole.

–=–

Now, let me throw a fallacy back at you Jan, so that you may understand not only how ridiculous your own rhetoric is, but that you cannot prove that its not true (can’t prove a negative). Here goes: since there are no halos in the Bible, only in the artworks of cults and religions, and since the halo comes from the God of Ra, you must therefore worship Ra as your false god because you put a halo on your book-cover.

Makes sense, if you are a fucking nut.

What you might want to ask yourself is this: why is this exposure of your severe, unadulterated shortcomings being delivered by yours truly at this moment, Jan?

Answer: because you actually didn’t read the Bible in the spirit intended, and you aren’t following it as the Law of Nature (existence). Instead some false religion (apparently from your new illegitimate “wife” and Mormon “guest”) has a strangling influence upon you. You’ve forced my hand by your false judgements of me and my family, leaving me no other choice that I might clear my own and my father’s name from your condemnation, your false measure. Though I forgive you, I want you to know that the Bible would have saved you from this ridiculousness. For it clearly instructs:

–=–

“Judge not, that yebe not judged. For with what judgment ye judge,ye shall bejudged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.“

What you reap you will sow, Jan. You just had to piss off the right man, leaving him no recourse than to do exactly what I’m doing here. And you did…

These verses are not mere suggestions, but stand as the Law of Nature (Truths). Action vs. reaction, where the moral teaching (parable) is to prevent the reaction (return judgement) by avoiding the initial, action (false judgement) while it’s still avoidable (not made public). Forgiveness must come before actions in judgement. To condemn based on lies is the furthest from emulating christ and God’s Nature (Truth). And your actions in false judgment then force the hand of others seeking such avoidance, who must protect their name (fictional persona/reputation) then as if it is their actual self. The Law of Nature (God), the Bible, is not there for you to use in judgment against others, but to emulate in your own actions of forgiveness, love, and compassion. You not only broke the Law but force my hand to do the same.

You see, what you reap is what shall be sowed upon you, either out of spite, revenge, or from necessity in my case. When you judge, especially without proofs, then one must judge you as ones only defense. In other words, you brought this upon yourself, Jan, by playing the character of the fool exactly as the Bible describes it and incessantly warns against. Instead, you keep claiming to be following what must be a very lonely “right-hand path” instead of the “left-hand” one, which is not in any way a Biblical connotation, and has nothing to do with Christ or the scriptures.

So what is this so-called “right-hand path?”

One thing for sure, it’s not in the Bible, and should not be confused with being on the “right-hand of God,” a metaphor meaning to act christ-like under the Law of God (Nature).

However, a quick search of any website regarding witchcraft and the occult reveals our answer. For instance:

“The distinctions Right Hand and Left Hand Path are usually only applied to traditions which are associated with the occult and magic but they can sometimes be applied to any religion or philosophical tradition. Generally the labels are used more specifically to differentiate Left Hand Path practitioners from those on the Right Hand Path who are often regarded as being the norm that Left Handers deviate from. Hence, many Right Hand Pathers don’t even recognise or use the term to refer to themselves. The terms left-hand and right-hand paths in Western occultism are often attributed to (i.e. made popular by) Theosophy founder Helena Blavatsky but in fact can be traced back to various Eastern practices and definitions.”

–=–

What a surprise, eh? Not really, since your listeners have commented many times about your use of occultist and theosophic terms like this. But then, a good chunk of your research came from such Theosophic sources in your early works, did they not, Jan? I certainly remember that being my own biggest critique of your early works. So, do you make it a general rule in your “research” to twist and misuse every damned thing you touch and see? Can this devilish persona (mask) of “Jan Irvin” even exist without spinning everything first and then calling it “unspun” just because Jan Irvin has now officially spoken on the subject? It’s like a grocery store having a sale by first marking up the price and then putting it on sale for the original price. Your life’s work is essentially a spin sale, upon which you place the empty title of unspun.

The other mistake you consistently make, which I have in depth addressed, is the use of the phrase “natural law,” which is often opposed to the “Law of Nature,” also known as the “Law of God.” After our shows with Bill Joslin, I did not attack Bill as you did, but instead dedicated a show to this misunderstanding of terms, of which you both suffered. Many will convince themselves that such semantics matter not, and they will continue to use these terms interchangeably. Big mistake!

Here is a link to that show, dedicated to helping (not hating) Bill Joslin (and all others) in his understanding of and distinction between these terms because of your attempts to cause us to be instead adversarial to each other:

In essence, unlike you, Jan, I took the critique of my colleague at being able to explain these concepts and I turned it into what I believe is the best show I’ve ever done, because I wanted to be absolutely uncompromised in my rhetoric. I didn’t just resort to name-calling and fallacious character assassination, I corrected my own shortcomings. I took self-responsibility to ensure I wasn’t misleading or obfuscating that which I sought to communicate. I can’t remember a time that you’ve done this, Jan.

Let’s be honest. There have been many others like myself, we being the unwitting receivers of the Gnostic Media 1-2 punch and curse, run over by the Gnostic bus, all of us thinking it a wise juncture to make innocent comments, helpful critiques, or simply leave provable contradictions to what one disgruntled emailer calls as the “Trivium guy!” But now, they (we) are coming out similar to Hollywood’s abused and exploited actresses (that prostituting A-list of professional liars), all making the same claims of abuse together, mostly about what a total dick you are to us all and to most others. Some even still donate to you — like after you squash a fly and its wings still jitter from nerves despite the abuse — showing how sociopaths truly can manipulate and get ahead as politicians, bankers, and of course certain podcasting authors, causing those you harm to turn around and support their own pain-stick. How many of your listeners have had to block your harassing emails, Jan, and why didn’t I think of that? LOL! I am certainly not the first or only victim of this bizarre behavior, as the virtual blood trail from your particular magic bus syndrome of shroom, DMT, and LSD madness seems endless, let alone claims of your own time spent in the psych ward. Now that I have received so many emails from others that have been brow-beaten by you both publicly and in private communications, which make you sound like the utter lunatic you’ve become (or rather, always have been), I can at least take comfort in our mutual victimization. I can have a bit more confidence to name you as the predator you are.

You remember when you said that hallucinogens should be called suggestogens because of the hypnotic suggestibility they put their users in? Well now, how many times have you “used” the CIA’s special candies again? 100’s? Do I hear 500, a 1,000 doses?

And to think, I didn’t recognize all this as a psychological pattern till way too late, wishing and perhaps remaining purposefully ignorant so as to stay on your good side — which is like being on the right hand side of a crashing airplane. Ironically, I was trying to stay friends with one of the main culprits of tearing people apart out there, not realizing I was already part of the virtual carnage left behind after being thrown under the bus for no qualifiable reason.

I could go on with this particular list (above), but let us instead speak about the moral aspect of Mr. Jan Irvin… or lack thereof. Because there appears to me to be none to be found. Are you what you pretend to be? Is your heterosexuality a qualifier meaning you are also a moral gentleman to the women you’ve used and desecrated? I learned the answer to this when I came to your home in California to visit, and where between that trip and our other private conversations, I learned about the real Jan Irvin:

1. To top it off, though I will not mention names, you were proud to inform me of the affair you were then having with one of your past guests, despite the fact that she was married with a severely mentally handicapped, autistic child, even as you still pretend moral conviction and superiority in such matters on air. I overlooked this and many other oddities and moral depredations, an action I now adamantly regret…

2. including that brand-spanking new Jeep that had to cost at least $60-70,000. Yes, when I visited you there at your home a few years ago, there it was — brand new and shiny. Beats my piece of shit, 1998 4-Runner valued at about $3,500, although at least I have no debt to cover. Do your “fans” know about this purchase, or do they think you use those donations to actually live as the meager and honest researcher you pretend to be? Did you announce that this overloaded dick-mobile was where all their money was going, or did you get credit and now must solicit money every second to pay it off? Do those who are already harmed by and disenfranchised from this system and who believe you to be one of them (us) know where their money is going to — another charlatan selling himself as a down and out and a desperate researcher, induced into obscurity and income deficiency by secret government agents so he can pay his luxury taxes? You even drove like an asshole all day with no consideration of common law or common sense, signs, or lines, showing no sign of respect to other drivers or to women in general, making vulgar comments with every new set of tits or ass that reared itself.

3. Also, while there visiting, you suggested to me something that I found not only unbelievable but tortuously unhinged. You told me that I should use my radio fame, as you do, to get laid. Firstly, Jan, I don’t at all confuse my extremely limited and censored infamy and internet open-broadcasting that anyone can do nowadays with even the remotest hint of fame, and neither should you. Of course, if I’m indeed trying to reason with a narcissist, such advice is useless. You’re so famous that from what I can tell you aren’t even censored like some of us actually are, and in fact are still appearing at the top of most search engines! Secondly, your complete and utter disregard for the moral treatment of women in this and so many other ways was so foreign to me that again I felt like the hollywood grunt or intern trying to get ahead by keeping your jackass behavior, the real you, a public secret. I went through this in Hollywood, working for some real duche-bags, and had to pretend friendship and respect to get ahead in the company. That’s one reason why I left. Well no more, Jan. I won’t comment on your sudden engagement to what some are even calling your new handler, your door prize for playing the devil, this mail-order bride to be from Maine. I don’t know her. But from what I’ve seen of your narcissistic, sociopathic behavior, she is sure to be your future-ex wife in no time at all if anything real exists in that relationship. Or perhaps you are two birds of the same feather?

4. Perhaps my favorite fallacy of yours, and the one that most describes your true moral character, was when you told me that your personal feeling on the way you can personally get back at “them” for their depopulation agenda and genocide was to “fuck” as many women as possible to try and get them pregnant with illegitimate children, to have as many kids as you can born out of wedlock. I couldn’t even respond to that one, Jan, and I remember thinking at the time that this day of hot-rodding around the mountain towns up there in the new Jeep couldn’t have been over any quicker. Meeting you in person was like seeing santa claus drunk in the back alley of Macy’s for the first time, meeting what you thought was a hero but realizing quickly the opposite. It was like the worst kind of bad date, and the only happy ending was when I put my rental car in drive, made like a tree, and leaved.

–=–

Finally, a few comments from your recent Q & A show posted at Gnostic Media, which is the perfect example of why sociopaths purposefully do not conduct call-in shows with their audiences:

You have admitted several times in the past to being part of the “royal” bloodline, privately and on air, directly related to several (actually all) US presidents, etc, of which I have done extensive genealogical research upon. In other words, technically, you are one of them by your own logic of association, just as I must be CIA if my father was, right Jan? You even had me talk privately to your royal-blooded mother for over an hour to try and explain what I had learned about private citizens and land from my guest KW and how your family was indeed the stock of “white persons” of the posterity of the US constitution’s preamble (purpose), qualified to be landholders or take back the land that was escheated from your family. Yet when someone asked you the perfectly legitimate question during your show of what blood-type you are, you reverted back to calling them a troll. Why? Why not just answer the question. All presidents that I am aware of are negative blood type. Obama was AB-, according to Time Magazine, the rarest type. But then you acted like you weren’t part of the bloodline so as to get to the next question, though you’ve admitted several times to being of the family and even how “they” tried to recruit you several times, supposedly failing. Let’s add this to the above fact that you were apparently recently approached by an “agent” to take money to quit your show and destroy your own reputation. You’ve got some ‘splaining to do, Jan.

I cracked up laughing when I heard you contradict yourself as you so often do. But this time it was kinda special. First you got annoyed at a question about the over twenty books by Anatoli Fomenko, then told the questioner that before he critiques the book series he should first read them all. Yet later in the same hour you said you only have read the first book in the series, and part of the second. Two out of one hundred? Is that due diligence? Is that good research? Is that good grammar to form good logic to back up your rhetoric? LOL! Why is this fallacious? Because you are claiming complete and utter knowledge and unwavering support of Fomenko and other authored works on history and culture, even though you have admittedly not read the books. You went against your own words. You outed yourself! It was beautiful. What is the difference between criticizing that which you have not read and supporting that which you’ve not read? Which is worse? Where does all this confidence come from about false history, Fomenko, Tartary etc.? And how can I or anyone else trust that you’ve actually read the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Quaran, or even Dr. Seuss since autumn of 2017? You certainly have no idea what the Bible’s message is, though you pretend to know by agreeing or disagreeing with what others say. And by the way, you can’t stand up in an actual Bible discussion worth a shit, either misusing or not knowing where to find the answers nor having any clue what it says. Let me quote you, because this is some funny shit! “You would need to, like, read his (Fomenkos’) 100 books on the subject, and, I think there’s 30 or so available in English… but so far, you know, ah, looking at the research myself, especially in the first 7 books, ah, it’s very, ah, solid, but again I’ve only read 2 of them or 1 and a half completely, but, ah, there’s a lot of good research in there but you’d have to study it for yourself and don’t take other people’s opinions, that would be the best way.” Is anybody actually listening to this? Are people just tuning in and tuning out? You just told people not to listen to you or your opinion, especially because you just admitted outright that you’ve only read at best 2 of Fomenko’s books out of 100, 30 of those that are actually in English. Yet you are an authority on the subject? WTF??? So everything you say is admittedly bullshit? You haven’t read his work, but you say with certainty that the dark ages were faked? Why, because you read most of the second book? This is nuts, man. Why are people giving you money? A fucking psych patient in a rubber room would be more entertaining… and have more experience to offer. Probably read more books too.

For this one, I’ll just quote you word for word, keeping in mind the symptoms of narcissistic sociopathy as we progress: “Clearly there’s 100’s of you that have been targeting me for years now, and that’s a lot of money when you think about it for, you know, for one podcast host. I can’t even think of how many, you know, 10’s of thousands — even millions of dollars that would cost to pay all of you, to keep your B.S. going…” You also said they were “trying to shut down my website for 2 or 3 months.” Now, I can’t imagine it would take them 2 or 3 months of trying and then they just give up because, after all, you are the great and indefatigable Jan Irvin. I’m sure they and their combined forces of darkness are powerless against your computer and its Gnostic superpowers. Your computer must have a christ-complex, man. Logos! Or maybe the Trivium protected you? But let’s focus on what you just said here about all the agents, the trolls, and how they are being paid just to mess with you. You seriously believe that, don’t you, that you are so important to them and they that they waste tons of resources, manpower, time, and money on you and your little website? So did they hire all these people separate just for the act of “fucking with” you, or are they normal agents with nothing else to do? Is this virtual attack on Jan Irvin actually a planned event or just work to do in downtime, like busy work, like when they aren’t busy with dictators, international war criminals and thieves, and corporate and political espionage, they had a memo passed around that said when there is no work as planned and your feeling like pervin’, attack Gnostic Media and Mr. Jan Irvin. You see, there, it even rhymes. Boy are they clever. Waitresses clean salt and pepper shakers and fill catsup bottles in their down time, while CIA agents and paid trolls sabotage Jan Irvin in theirs? Or maybe you actually think you are their main concern? LOL! O, my dear Jan, when you look back at your life’s work and realize you’ve done nothing to harm them or they but relay to other people what is already publicly disclosed (declassified) information, and probably only what they don’t mind you relaying and maybe even hope that you will, perhaps then you will come down from your pedestal and quit pretending your shit don’t stink. I believe your statement above qualifies as paranoia of the spectrum infinitum. Actually I just made that up. It means endless, narcissistic, sociopathic paranoia with no boundaries in reality or rational thought. Hell, they apparently spend more on you and have more assets watching you than they do Jason Bourne, and he isn’t even real! You also said, “they (trolls) are definitely watching what we are doing. They don’t like what we’re doing here. That’s too bad. You know. Whatever…” Bravo! Bravo, Jan! Well spoken. It’s so clear now. Tolls don’t like us, especially you, so they watch us, especially you, according to the official troll code manual section 21.5.678, which only Jan Irvin has privileges to. FJEO = for Jan’s ego only. Jan, to be clear, people don’t attack you, you attack them, and then they block your email to try and tune you out. That’s what victims do.

The best thing you’ve ever done for your body is to “drink buttered coffee?” LOL! There was a recently published, false peer-reviewed study that lied and said chocolate helps people lose weight. And so all the TV doctors parroted that study while their fans went out and got fat on the chocolate diet. It must be true if Jan Irvin says it, right? If it’s right for Jan, expect the one size fits all fallacy to follow.

The Trivium was given (as a gift? apparently by Jan Irvin and Company) to the world to solve all the worlds problems? Seriously? You stated “We already released the Trivium…” as the answer to the question, how do we save the world? You said it as if you were Superman speaking casually about how he saved the world. You said it as if you are its inventor! Get over this Trivium worship dude! Because last time I checked, the Trivium ain’t altered shit, and that’s because the trivium isn’t a real thing. It’s a method, and one you use in a generally unscientific and unreasonable manner. It’s not a holy grail. It will not save the world, and neither will your rhetoric. The Trivium is not the Law of God, it is the law of Jan Irvin.

You said all religions are based on “logos.” That’s hilarious. What are you, Captain Obvious now, or do you still not understand what the word Logos is defined as? Logos is the perception of what God is by men. So yes, that’s what all of the thousands of religions would be based on, of course. LOL! No wisdom shared there, as usual. How can you believe you are speaking with wisdom when you are merely pointing to the sky and calling it blue? Nice spin, again.

There are no books missing from the Bible, Jan. If there are, then show me the original Bible that has those original books in it? Again, fallacious reasoning without the possibility of proof or source. Can’t prove a negative though, so again, well-played. Some “books” do exist. Granted. Those “books” are not in “the Bible.” Again, granted. Neither is “Mary Had A Little Lamb.” These are totally separate facts that you (and many others) insist are not separate. But to thus equate this to the statement that therefore the Bible is missing those books is like saying that because a walnut tree is not growing olives, the walnut tree is thus missing its olives. Obviously the walnut mafia must have coerced those helpless, unorganized olives to dismiss themselves from their original tree, with the help of the troll brute squad. Help me out here, Jan, which logical fallacy is this? This type of sophist conceptualization is the epitome of your circular rhetoric.

According to the continuous, accusatory name-calling on this show, trolls are defined as: (1) anyone that asks a hard question, (2) anyone with “no activity” on their “account,” (3) “braindead,” and/or (4) people with “little dicks.” So apparently, only people like you, Jan, who by your own rhetoric here is implied therefore to have a bigger than average dick, can rise to the level of researcher and yet again narcissistic host of Gnostic Media. And since it sounds like you label as “trolls” most of your audience, I am thinking there are very few non-trolls actually listening by your logic, or just a lot of little-docked ones. So do you broadcast your show just for troll entertainment? Shouldn’t you then tell advertisers that the majority of your listeners are trolls, so they might not confuse your website traffic statistics with all the CIA-paid trolls with small dicks? Perhaps male enhancement pills would be a hot selling item on Gnostic Media? But then, if we all had penises or active brains or even lots of activity on our avatar accounts like Jan Irvin must apparently have based on this rhetoric, then we’d all instantly become as smart and Gnosticly-orientated as Jan himself. Then what? Who would you belittle then? Who would you compare your man-hood to if that happened? Oh, and by the way, by your logic, all trolls (conspirators) are also homosexuals. So anyone you’ve called an agent, CIA, troll, or dirty is thus by default a homosexual, since homosexuals are in your head somehow behind ALL conspiracies. So anyone that asks a hard question or registers an avatar so they can ask you a question is a homosexual (conspirator). LOL!

Most open researchers and authors will state that there are no dumb questions, but you say there are lots of them in your forum. A dumb question is apparently one you don’t want to answer or think is beneath you. Perhaps only the gays ask dumb questions as part of their conspiratorial nature? What a narcissistic Dick. You addressed basically all questions as at the very best being beneath you, and yet still people paid for your asinine answers. Amazing. You are like the pied piper of predatory snake-oil salesmen.

—

I could do this all day… But alas, all things must come to an end.

If there is one life lesson you certainly haven’t learned yet Jan, it’s that you do not fuck with he that has nothing to lose. You’re little tirade against me worked only as long as I could stand to throw myself a perpetual pity party and act like such an abused, whiny little bitch. Whatever your goal, congratulations, I sure don’t have anyone beating down my door for an interview anymore. My books are sitting virtually still while I pay storage for them I can’t afford. Am I blaming you? No. I’m blaming myself for quitting my show because of your inconceivably confusing treatment of me – for allowing myself to become yet another of your victims. I’m not blaming you for anything here, I’m just liberating myself from your particular brand of batshit crazy. I’m taking my power back from you, not that I ever really lost it. I’m doing exactly what the victims of a narcissistic sociopathic should do, expunge my life of your influence and waiting without much hope for your sincere (if that’s possible) retraction and apology. Until then, let this open letter be a beacon to others to steer clear of the false light emanating from your Gnostic nonsense and abusive, narcissistic, sociopathic nature. And may your other victims have the courage to do the same, to stand up, to demand proofs, to demand apologies and retractions, and to take their own power back.

One thing I have recently begun to consider, which is a very frightening thought, is that a good many of alternative media hosts, shock jocks, and authors out there are just like you. But even worse than this is the notion that many of us start to emulate your nature and tone, your behavior, your narcissistic sociopathy, either to sell products or even just to fit in and be a accepted by peers that now almost expect this sociopathic behavior in their media and “news.” How do you compete with Alex jones, for example, the perfection of a narcissistic sociopath, without trying to outdo him? For if you oppose him or act at all sane in your delivery, his audience (strange network of supporters) is trained to use exactly the same fallacious rhetoric and labeling that Jan Irvin has perfected, without any form of proof, relying completely on heresy and social consent. Are the airwaves ruled by sociopaths? I can’t say this. But I can say that sociopathic behavior is being mirrored and performed by many out there, and seemingly has somehow become what people expect. People are at least pretending sociopathy to fit in to the alternative narrative, parroting each other as source without fact-checking. Of this phenomenon, we are all victims.

Jan, I’d like to impart to you a bit of knowledge, in the form of a parable of my own making. I realize that, in your mind, anyone who might happen to fart in your general direction is suspect of being a paid farter out to cause organized flatulence against you (that’s sarcasm, dick). But keep in mind, if I have to fart in an elevator and you happen to be in that elevator car when my body expresses the need to blow foul air, I’m going to fart — and it has nothing to do with you or your life or your information or your opinions or your website. Sometimes, Jan, a fart is just a fart. And sometimes, like in my case, a good man is just a good man, or is at least trying to learn and break free so as to be one.

And that brings us to the end. All eyes are on you, Jan. Will you do the right thing and retract your false, unprovable accusations against me and my father that you’ve never met nor even know his first name? Or will you openly attack me further with whatever fallacious things you can imagine in that crazy brain database of yours, so as to further obfuscate the fact that your original accusations were completely made up and without one line item of evidence? The choice, and I dare say your reputation, is on the line here, man.

Until then, we all wait with bated breath. Actually, that’s not true. I could give a shit what you do. I mean, really, no one should believe anything a sociopath does or says.

But then again, as expected, you’ve already put me in that brain database, haven’t you, with a line connecting me to Mark Passio? So, as your listeners complain that even though you’ve had thirty thousand times more contact with Mark Passio than I ever did or will, there is no line stringing Jan Irvin to any of these bad guys including Mark Passio, even though you’ve worked with and even called as friends a great many of those that you now call as CIA agents? That, Jan, is truly a sociopathic mentality. Remember, your silly strings connecting people in your brain program is not proof of anything but your own demented worldview. Use primary source for once in your fucking life.

One last thing… I forgive you, Jan, because that’s what my moral, scriptural, unwritten Law says self-evidently is the only way to peace, love, and happiness. This doesn’t mean I want anything further to do with you, though. This open letter was more like a good, bowel-relieving wet fart that helped me to let go of the unnecessary pressure caused by holding your bullshit in. But this should not be confused with the kind of fart mentioned above. No, this one was most certainly pointed right at your damned face.

In Part One of this essay, we discussed the ancient legal custom of the keeping of and recording of time. We know that time is money and money is time. We know that without time limits, bills and speeding tickets would never be paid. And we can now understand that, while the poor and middle-class commoner pays for his crimes with time, the wealthy elite pay for their organized crimes in money, which fictionally represents time. Our entire labor pool, in fact, works on the same valuation structure, where the poor are paid in money in exchange for their time and labor, which then allows them to purchase essential foodstuffs and supplies to survive and suffer further use as employees (subjects). The disparagement between what labor can accomplish and what is paid for it in money, of course, is ridiculously disproportional. For without the labor of the poor, the wealthy simply could not exist. Most importantly though, we can now comprehend a dualistic calendric time system constructed to separate the wheat and the chaff, the common majority from the elitist minority.

Before reading Part Two, it is recommended though not absolutely necessary to start from the beginning, here:

Though one of the pillars of fiction certainly rests upon money (a simulation of the artificial/man-made valuation of time), we will save this topic of money, or more specifically that of “mammon” for Part Three of this series. For to speak of the simulation of money as the valuation of all things Real into a nihilistically circular pattern of nothingness, we must first understand the nature of just what dissimulation accomplishes in society so that such a system is accepted as a false and seemingly indispensable paradigm. We must discuss how it destroys ethics, morals, and values by separating (dis-associating) man from Nature and Its Law(s), and why this quality of attaining through education, entertainment, false valuation, and other simulations of Reality a state of dissimulation in the public mind is an essential pillar to uphold the entirety of the fictional, legally represented model of simulation.

What is fiction can never be said to be Reality accept in appearance only — as some artful form without substance behind it. Legal fiction is, therefore, always but a simulation of Reality, which causes in men a dissimulation from what is Real (of Nature).

What’s the difference between simulation and dissimulation?

Ah… the answer to this question ultimately reveals the source of all of our problems.

Firstly, we must distinguish that the word simulation is a noun, as the name of something artificial, including lies. Dissimulation is an adjective, describing the results any simulation has upon the mind and actions of men. Dissimulation is caused and based upon some simulated version of Reality. Without simulation there is no dissimulation, just as without darkness there is no light, ect.

In Dante’s Inferno, one of the names prescribed to the devil was simply the prefix of “DIS.” The use of this word-forming agent stands always as an upsetting, unsettling alteration of its root, one that is generally adversarial or damaging to that which it is attached. Dis-ease, dis-satisfaction, dis-appear, dis-respect, dis-appoint, dis-regard, dis-turb, and dis-associate are examples of this factor.

Before we may understand what dis-simulation is, we must first examine the nature of what its root word symbolizes. So just what is a simulation in the legal fiction?

SIMULATE – To assume the mere appearance of, without the reality; to assume the signs or indications of, falsely; to counterfeit; feign; imitate; pretend. To engage,usually with the co-operation or connivance of another person, in an act or series of acts, which are apparently transacted in good faith,and intended to be followed by their ordinary legal consequences, but which in reality conceal a fraudulent purpose of the party to gain thereby some advantage to which he is not entitled, or to injure, delay, or defraud others.(Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

SIMULATION – Assumption of appearance which was feigned, false, deceptive, or counterfeit. In the civil law. Misrepresentation or concealment of the truth;as where parties pretend to perform a transaction different from that in which they really are engaged. A feigned, pretended act, one which assumes the appearance without the reality and, being entirely without effect, it is held not to have existed, and, for that reason, it may be disregarded or attacked collaterally by any interested person. In French law. Collusion; a fraudulent arrangement between two or more persons to give a false or deceptive appearance to a transaction in which they engage. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

SIMULATED FACT – In the law of evidence. A fabricated fact; an APPEARANCE given to things BY HUMAN DEVICE, with a view TO DECEIVE AND MISLEAD.(Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

ILLUSION – noun – s as z. [Latin illusio, from illudo, to illude.] Deceptive appearance; false show,by which a person is or may be deceived, or his expectations disappointed; mockery. Ye soft illusions, dear deceits, arise! (Webster’s Dictionary of the American Language, 1828)

–=–

In other words, a simulation is a purposefully deceitful lie that is made to appear similar to what it represents. For our purposes, simulation is never a good thing. This is to say that to openly lie, to live in and by lies, is certainly and self-evidently a bad thing. For when one lies for a living, one begins to disassociate oneself from Reality, Its Nature (Source), and Its Law(s). This mental falling away is known as dissimulation.

In law, simulation is never sameness. It is always false and thus always untrue compared to its origin, its model. There is no exception to this rule, just as nothing of the cartoon realm may be manifested in Reality, in the Realm of Nature. Art should never be confused to be the Real thing. This should be a self-evident Truth to the reader. But Truth is very often hidden behind that which is simulated as if it were Truth (e.g. the entirety of legal law). And so we may continue with the understanding that though a simulation is never True, a simulation can cause one to dissimulate from the Truth that is simulated in its place. What is made to appear to be the same, in other words, is most often a purposeful deceit. Simulation is always a lie, despite the matter the reason behind it.

A simulation is generally created as a purposeful venture — an intentional false-hood. The dissimulation it causes, however, is often quite mysterious, as the victim of simulation often doesn’t realize his or her state of dissimulation. This notion is quite apparent in just the fact that most people have no idea that their persona (legal status) as a completely fictional, commercial vessel in society and law (jurisdiction) is completely separate from their actual (True) Self. In other words, it is when the agent (employee) begins to believe that he or she is in every way the very flattering title ascribed by some authority figure (principal/employer) that dissimulation has grabbed hold of the mind.

If I simulate a police officer, and I therefore blur the lines between the job and the lifestyle and benefits it portends, I may be inclined to abuse said authority. If I believe I am that fictional character in agency under the authority and licensure of some higher principal (authority), and that title allows me certain pretended and violent powers over others, then I will begin to develop and use those powers as if they are Real. I will begin to treat others in the common arena (without a badge or license) that I perceive to have less authority as myself without regard to any moral law. I will do this because I believe that my actions are not my own, but that of a fictional character assigned to me, so that my actions are the actions of my employer, not myself. I take no self-responsibility for my actions, as my employer/principal has granted me its supposedly higher authority to act in its name and under its insurances (liability). I no longer feel liable for my actions. At this point, I am now fully dissimulated into the fiction, believing that the simulation of this fictional character assigned to me from some higher authority is actually Reality, which through that agency relationship causes me to express the personality and artificial essence of that simulated character instead of self-governing myself under the Law of Nature.

When the artificial (legal) hood becomes indistinguishable from the Reality that there is no actual hood, the belief in that false-hood (simulation) as Truth causes dissimulation.

FALSEHOOD – A statement or assertion known to be untrue, and intended to deceive.A WILLFUL act or declaration contrary to the truth. The term is perhaps generally used in the second sense here given. It is committed either by the WILLFUL act of the party,OR BY DISSIMULATION,or by words. Crabbe thus distinguishes between falsehood and untruth: “The latter (untruth) is an untrue saying, and may be unintentional, in which case it reflects no disgrace on the agent. A falsehood and a lie are intentional false sayings, differing only in degree of the guilt of the offender; falsehood being not always for the express purpose of deceiving,but a lie always for the worst of purposes.Deceit; Fraud;Misrepresentation. A fabrication. Scotch Law. A fraudulent imitation or suppression of truth, to the prejudice of another. “Something used and published falsely.” An old Scottish nomen juris. “Falsehood is undoubtedly a nominate crime, so much so that Sir George Mackenzie and our older lawyers used no other term for the falsification of writs, and the name ‘forgery‘ has been of modern introduction.” “If there is any distinction to be made between ‘forgery’ and ‘falsehood,’ I would consider the latter (falsehood) to be more comprehensive than the former.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

–=–

So what then is dis-simulation?

What happens when the simulation, the false-hood, the deceitful appearance as false show takes over the rationality of the host? What happens when we begin to identify personally (in a person-hood) with such a false appearance with fictionally prescribed authority?

We enter into The (legal) Matrix.

Generally speaking, we become either the victim or the perpetrator of every crime against Nature (God) and each other imaginable. We become the adversary (DIS) of ourselves. For both the victim and the villain suffer from dissimulation, simply because the delusion of power in the agent can only exist as a direct reflection of the illusion of authority by some third party. Respect of the illusion of power by the victim of it feeds the delusion of power carried by the victims antagonist. In either disposition, we have plugged into the delusional, legal fiction of flattering titles. We become the agents of our own enslavement.

From my legally anonymous work (book):

But how can one best define what “agency” is when most of us have no inkling we are even a participant in this agentic relationship with the United States or other district, never being fully informed that we stand as publicly registered agents for service of process for the person (status) in the citizen-ship we are assigned at the nativity event of our fictional delivery and birth as a legal entity?

In the 1960s, Dr. Stanley Milgram conducted experiments where he controversially uncovered this “agentic” personality and how most people are susceptible to it. His experiment posed one stranger as the dominant “teacher” against another stranger given the title of a subordinate “learner,” whereas the learner would be shocked with increasingly more painful shocks through switches controlled by the teacher delivered with each wrong answer. The experiment was designed to show how far the random cross-section of common people would induce electric shocks upon a strapped in subject when they suspected the non-consent, injury, or even death of the flatteringly titled “learner” in the next room. A majority of the “teachers” would indeed knowingly deliver these shocks when told to do so by a “doctor” in a lab coat uniform, signifying a false but persuasive symbolical figure of authority. Some would only continue if the doctor took full responsibility for damage or death to the person called the “learner.” This was historically the most ambitious and frightening scientific test on personhood and agency, as to the uncovering of what men will do when given flattering titles of authority even as simple as “teacher,” and are then mentally made subjects of yet another seemingly higher authority. But the actions of these test subjects in a middle state of authoritative power through agency were completely voluntary, being fully informed and able to voluntarily quit the experiment whenever they felt the need or moral compunction, and they were even paid before the test began with this foreknowledge of the ability to quit and keep that pre-paid payment.

In the end, it was only ever the “teacher” that was the subject of the experiment, and the results were shocking to the science community. Milgram summarized his experiments within a 1974 article in Harper’s Magazine entitled “The Perils of Obedience,” where he stated:

—=—

“The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience are of enormous importance, but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations. I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist.Stark authority was pitted against the subjects’ [participants’] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects’ [participants’] ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not.The extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding explanation. Ordinary people,simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become AGENTS in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality,relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.”

(Now you can understand why anyone in The Matrix was a potential agent.)

In other words, common people lack self-governance under a voluntary, unenforceable, moral Law. Most men acting in the agency of another, as a legal person in flattering title, has no True Religion, for a person (puppet) is not a Living man and has no spirit or control of its own. The puppet controls the man standing in surety to the puppet. The man follows the law of persons, under the law of agency. And whole militaries (of otherwise innocent men) can be made to murder each other under this incredible phenomenon of agency.

Milgram elaborated two theories that were summarized in the publication American Psychologist:

—=—

“The first is the theory of conformism, based on Solomon Asch conformity experiments, describing the fundamental relationship between the group of reference and the individual person. A subject who has neither ability nor expertise to make decisions, especially in a crisis, will leave decision making to the group and its hierarchy.The group is the person’s behavioral model.”

“The second is the agentic state theory, wherein, per Milgram, ‘the essence of obedience consists in the fact that a person comes to view themselves as the instrument for carrying out another person’s wishes, and they therefore no longer see themselves as responsible for their actions. Once this critical shift of viewpoint has occurred in the person,all of the essential features of obedience follow.’”

Once this “agentic” personality is established (i.e. dissimulation), it is obviously very hard to break the ingrained pattern of personality and practice it creates. Thus the branding of citizenship and public-minded-ness upon all children in each nation is part of the economy and society, from the school system to enter-tain-ment. We literally grow up believing we are the fictional persona assigned to us at birth; the name, the number, and the titles (or lack thereof). But in Reality, we are (acting as) commercial agents for a principal “dummy” corporation, our residential address actually a place of domestic (family) business. Responsibility is replaced by insurance. Moral virtue is replaced by strict law. And Reality is hidden behind several forms of artificial matrixes and systems designed to create a sense of false security. The strawman as a dis-ease is the avatar, the projected self image we play as actors in the fictional persona of that legal matrix, a silent weapon for a quiet war over our minds.

If in your mind it is difficult to comprehend this separate, fictional persona (legal mask) and the fact that you are acting in agency within it, just think of it this way… if you can believe in the foolish personification of God by the church into a personage and likeness of man, why can’t you imagine the same personification of man into a fictional character or citizen-ship of the state? If you are emotionally effected by watching cartoon characters on the magic screen, then what makes you think you are not equally effected by the psychological imaginations and devices of the fictional legal personas of other men and by your own actions in that false persona and agentic title?

—=—

“I feel I owe you an apology. We have a rule: we never free a mind once it’s reached a certain age. It’s dangerous; the mind has trouble letting go… As long as The Matrix exists, the human race will never be free.”

—Line as read by Morpheus (the god of sleep), from the movie: ‘The Matrix’

—=—

The creators of this legal fiction matrix code control our lives via (our) suretyship to its registered property. We are made to believe the character in persona we play is Real, just as the reflection in the mirror may fool our sense of True Being; True Life. Through this property (personhood) we are caused to be plugged in to its legal, commercial framework, that matrix of word-magic and illusion, and so as if the chains were actually Real, we believe ourselves to be bound by the laws of another’s property (fiction). We cannot seem to escape our own delusion.

The dangerous pride of this glad acceptance of such artificial titles, personality, property, and character is of course spoken of in the Bible, where it admonishes the proudness of men in their receivership of false and unnatural things and pretended authorities over other men through such artificial means, which in Reality amounts merely to an abandonment of the only True Equity and duty under the Law of God’s Creation (Nature). We abandon our True Selves and pretend with false pride to be what we are not, what does not actually Exist (in Nature)…

To show the extreme parallel put forward as a purposeful metaphor of The Matrix story to the legal system and code, we only need replace the science fiction element with legal fiction and its imaginary, proprietary language. For the legal matrix code as well makes all common men equal, while the machine-like elites control us through the artificial wombs they invent and provide under legal contract.

You see, the birth certificate is your very own artificial womb. It represents the simulated birth of a legal entity, designed to cause you to dissimulate from Reality, from Nature and Its Law.

Eventually, the reader will understand that the movie is not fiction at all, but a metaphoric story of the legally controlled masses of public citizen-ships (commercial vessels in persona) of all the soon-to-be-united-as-one nations.

MATRIX – noun – [Latin matrix from mater, mother.] 1. The womb; the cavity in which the fetus of an animal is formed and nourished till its birth. 2. A mold;the cavity in which any thing is formed, and which gives it shape; as the matrix of a type. 3. The place where any thing is formed or produced; as the matrix of metals; gang. 4. In dyeing, the five simple colors, black, white, blue, red and yellow, of which all the rest are composed. (Webster’s Dictionary of the American Language, 1828)

MATRIX – Womb. A place where anything is generated or formed. (Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary, 1755)

MATRIX – In civil law,the protocol or first draft of a legal instrument, from which all copies must be taken.(Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

ARTIFICER – noun – [Latin artifex, from ars, and facio.] 1. An artist; a mechanic or manufacturer; one whose occupation requires skill or knowledge of a particular kind; as a silversmith, or sadler. 2. One who makes or contrives; an inventor; as an artificer of fraud or lies. 3. A cunning, or artful fellow. [not used.] (Webster’s Dictionary of the American Language, 1828)

—=—

The birth certificate is a matrix in the legal sense of the word, which is the protocol or first draft of a legal instrument, from which all copies must be taken. Now you know why you need it to obtain a driver’s license and other legal documents, as proof of birth (existence) of the legal entity (strawman) you are claiming to be an agent for. Whatever you do in civil (legal/fictional/commercial) life will be, of course, obtained through that matrix. This legal simulation of your vital statistics at birth is what becomes your agentic, artificial identity. And what’s planned for the future of the A.I. is much, much worse…

–=–

“Genecoin: DNA for the Blockchain… So, why would anyone want to encode their DNA on the Blockchain? Like much in the crypto space, some projects are a solution in search of a problem. However, one easy reason to use the blockchain to store DNA would be as a replacement for a traditional ‘Birth Certificate.’ Notarization has long been a function provided by the Bitcoin Blockchain, so to ‘notarize’ the existence of a person’s DNA could attest to the existence of an identity,and its age.This attestation would thereafter function in much the same way as does our current oracle-based (hospital-centric) system. Additionally, for those thinking of the far off future, another fanciful notion might be to encode one’s DNA for the purposes of cloning by a future generation…”

—Bitcoin Magazine Online, from an article entitled, “Genecoin: DNA for the Blockchain”

–=–

Whereas today we may discard by discharge this legal identity, in the future it will be part of your genetic make-up. In other words, the dissimulation of legal identity will be a permanent part of your body, an unremovable, non-payable contractual performance debt that is property of government — the ultimate mark.

We are all programmed from childhood to dissimulate ourselves into this false, legal identity, as if we are taking responsibility for a cartoon version of us, while pretending that damage done in the cartoon world (legal fiction/commerce) is the same thing as damage done to what is Real (of Nature). Sticks and stones may certainly break your bones, but legal words are now capable of damages far beyond the temporary pain and bruising of those Real things.

This brainwashing and redirection from our Natural course is expounded upon perfectly here by Alexis de Tocqueville:

—=—

“After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will,the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community.It covers the surface of society with a network of small, complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.”

“But one also finds in the human heart A DEPRAVED TASTE FOR EQUALITY, which impels the weak to want to bring the strong down to their level, and which REDUCES MEN TO PREFERRING EQUALITY IN SERVITUDE TO INEQUALITY IN FREEDOM.”

“Furthermore, when citizens are all almost equal,it becomes difficult for them to defend their independence against the aggressions of power. As none of them is strong enough to fight alone with advantage, the only guarantee of liberty is for everyone to combine forces. But such a combination is not always in evidence.”

“The majority’s moral power makes individuals internally ashamed to contradict it,which in effect silences them,and this silencing culminates in a cessation of thinking.“

—Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859), separate quotes

—=—

Not ironically, trying to tell people they are trapped inside a legal matrix code is not at all different than trying to tell people they are trapped inside an artificial womb and connected to a computerized simulation of Reality. Both suffer equally from dissimulation. For dissimulation is of course the purpose of creating such matrixes.

Again, I can only compare the process of attempting to wake other men up from their legalistically caused dissimulation to that epic fight scene in the epic movie (documentary?) They Live. Just put on the damn sunglasses man!

–=–

In the end, after so much cognitive dissonance, after a lifetime of existingfalsely in the simulation, he finally sees them for what they are…This is inception. This is the moment we (painfully)
release ourselves from dissimulative reasoning.Perhaps then we may stop fighting each other and destroy the source of the simulation?

–=–

Equality is not promoted in the Bible, in the Law of Nature. There is no such thing. Equality can only be achieved through legal, artificial means. Equality is purely a fictional construct of man, fruit from that tree of knowledge. Equality is not designed to free men but to enslave them. Only slaves and subjects are equal. And yet the king (sovereign) has no equal.

Equality without consideration of equity is but a dissimulation away from the foundations and intent of any moral law.

Maxim of Law: “He who seeks equity must do equity.“

What is True equity in law?

EQUITABLE – That which is in conformity to the natural law.” (–Bouvier’s Dictionary of Law, 1856)

–=–

One should never confuse or intermix the notion of the Law of Nature and legal law, which are always opposed to each other. Therefore, as stated in this lecture, the idea of legal equity is merely the empty form of Natural equitableness. That is to say that a court of equity can only consider legal things within legal places and legal status (persona), not Reality, for the law of man (form) has no connection to anything in Nature (substance), only the concept of a property (descriptive words) thereof. A man must act equitably towards all others regardless of status or lack thereof in substance (in Nature) if he expects the law to enforce equitable behavior from others. Political equality defeats every man that acts without equitableness — without (outside of) the Highest Law of God (Nature).

Equality is but a legal concept, represented in law as a legal simulation, which in and of itself is merely a fictional rationalization (of man’s law) that can only be described as a dissimulation from Nature and Its Law(s). And as Alexis de Tocqueville declared above, the nature of this legal (fictional) state reduces men to preferring equality in servitude to inequality in freedom. Only the self-governing man observing at all times substantial equitableness to all of man and Nature can be free of these destructive simulations of man’s law. For to be conditioned through the eyes of legalistic (political) equality causes men necessarily to act without consideration of equitableness, for “a government can only enforce strict laws.” This is to say that while the law of equality is a creation and therefore a property of man, equity stems from the unwritten (inherent) Law of Nature, and therefore is inherent only in men regenerate of mind and thus liberated from man’s law. Equitableness, in other words, can only be expressed despite strict (legal) law.

Unfortunately, the direct result of equality is the devolution into democracy. Again, in this modern system of political equality we suffer from, we can see a mass dissimulation away from each of our own individuality, from the True Self where equity resides, in order to instill the presidents of this mob rule sense of democracy.

—=—

“Democracy is the road to socialism.”

—Karl Marx

—=—

“Democracy is indispensable to socialism.”

“Socialism is merely state-capitalist monopoly which is made to serve the interests of the whole people…”

“Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.”

—Plato

—=—

“Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”

—John Adams

—=—

“A pure democracy is generally a very bad government. It is often the most tyrannical government on earth;for a multitude is often rash,andwill not hear reason.”

—Noah Webster

—=—

“The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them in parliament.”

—Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

—=—

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”

—Winston Churchill

—=—

“The President will lead in the treason. Your militia will leave you and fight against you… When evil men take office the whole gang will be in collusion.They will keep the people in utter ignorance and steal their liberty by ambuscade (by surprise, by lying in wait). When Government removes your armaments, you will have no power, but government will have all power.”

—Patrick Henry (emphasis added)

—=—

“The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.”

—John F. Kennedy

—=—

From the Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon, under Strong’s Concordance #H571, we may understand that the only Truth, the only Reality is Nature Itself. Nature needs no simulation or false appearance to Exist. It needs no words, no names, no titles, and certainly no approval by men. It neutrally defends Itself without somehow anthropomorphically believing It has some pretended set of positive law “rights” to do so. But so that we may know the more accurate definition of “just what is Truth” from the Bible, we must attempt to define it according to its authors Original (Natural) intent while also showing its adversarial, false appearance. Herein a deeper understanding of dissimulation becomes apparent.

The lexicon for Strong’s H571 (truth) states in part:

“…Sincerity, opposed to dissimulation. Truth, opposed to falsehood…”

–=–

Here we find the key to understanding the difference between simulation and dissimulation, for we may only Truly know anything by comparing its opposite:

Truth is opposed to simulation (falsehood), though it resembles (appears as) Truth. Therefore everything that is legally (artificially) considered is by the Law of Nature a falsehood.

Sincerity is opposed to dissimulation, which dissembles (changes or lacks the appearance of) anything from Its Truth.

A simulation is a game, while dissimulation is a lifestyle.

A simulation is an outright lie, while dissimulation is a mental delusion.

A dissimulation is an adversarial simulation. While simulation in and of itself is a lie, as a purposeful departure from even the appearance and false show of what is Truth, dissimulation is the simulation of a complete lie. When simulation is based on what is already a lie, then what results is a simulacra, a copy without an original (a simulation of a simulation/lie, as a copy of a copy). Thus the lie becomes the only truth imaginable to the dissimulated man, for the lie appears to be the Truth of what is being simulated.

Simulation is indeed a deception, but dissimulation is much worse. For dissimulation is a self-deception.

–=–

“Make no mistake about it – enlightenment is a destructive process.It has nothing to do with becoming better or being happier. Enlightenment is the crumbling away of untruth.It’s seeing through the facade of pretense. It’s the complete eradication of everything we imagined to be true.”

–Adyashanti

–=–

“To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment.”

“Every particular in nature, a leaf, a drop, a crystal, a moment of time is related to the whole,and partakes of the perfection of the whole.”

—Ralph Waldo Emerson (separate quotes)

–=–

A simulation is a false appearance, but to dissimulate from oneself is to hide ones Real Self behind that false show (simulation) — a lie within a lie. The difference is a staggeringly important one. It enters into the realm of the simulacrum.

The Stanford University Press explains in part this term simulacrum:

–=–

“Phantom Communities reconsiders the status of the simulacrum—sometimes defined as a copy of a copy,but more rigorously defined asa copy that subverts the legitimacy and authority of its model—in light of recent debates in literature, art, philosophy, and cultural studies.”

—A critique for ‘Phantom Communities: The Simulacrum and the Limits of Postmodernism’ by Prof. Scott Durham

–=–

The Matrix simulation in that movie was the 6th version of a computer-generated version of a society long dead. It was a copy of a copy, also said to be a copy without an original. The model was one of control, not conformity to Reality. Likewise, the legal matrix code is designed in exactly the same way, as a device to remove one from any semblance of the Reality and Law(s) of Nature and to keep one trapped inside the copy, viewing the Real world through the dissimulation of an artificial womb built merely of symbols and signs, and based on induced, delusional belief in the veracity of the illusionary un-Real, simulated as if it were the only Reality.

Are we being sincere in our citizen-ship, in legal person-hood? Or are we acting as patient victims under that civil dis-course without responsibility to ourselves and to Nature?

Our problem is not simulation itself, but the fact that we represent a simulated version of ourselves. Representation as a concept relays the idea that the sign, symbol, or token (personification) and the Real thing are essentially equivalent (i.e. sameness) — that the form represented is for all intents and purposes equal to the actual substance of the Real. Thus the concept of “representing myself” is a redundant action at best, and downright stupid at worst. What is Truth, what is of Reality needs no re-presentation, for what is Truth needs no sign or token to be understood, for it cannot by its very Nature be misunderstood. Only its name (simulation) may be dissimulated as property (form), not the Real (self-evident) thing in and of itself (substance).

But what happens when instead we choose to re-present something that is by its nature already a simulation (a lie)? If the root of the idea of representation is that the token, symbol, name, or sign (form) and the Real substance are equivalent, then the only thing we can represent in the legal realm is that which is a lie. Man cannot stand legally without some fictional representation of his True Nature and Self any more than he can enter into the cartoon realm to commune and interact with the cartoons therein. For a simulation is always a lie, no matter how closely the form of that simulation resembles its substantive model in the Real.

In other words, when we go into court representing a legal entity, we are appearing as a lie (simulated fact). We are representing that we accept as legitimate the lie (sin) and that we are responsible and in surety for its legal actions. We are representing (personifying) a simulation (a lie). We are therefore presenting ourselves as if we actually are a creature of the simulacrum, a copy without an original. We have thus entered into the darkness of fiction as a dissimulation of ourselves. We have just plugged into the legal version of The Matrix.

It is interesting to note that the term “dissimulation” seems to apply in a dramatic way to our default status of public personhood within these nations of goyim, remembering that DIS is attributed to be one of the many names of satan (that which is adversarial to Nature/Reality).

DISSIMULATION – noun – [Latin, to make like; like.] The act of dissembling;a hiding under a false appearance; a feigning; false pretension; hypocrisy. Dissimulation may be simply concealment of the opinions, sentiments or purpose; but it includes also the assuming of a false or counterfeit appearance which conceals the real opinions or purpose. Dissimulation among statesmen is sometimes regarded as a necessary vice, or as no vice at all. Let love be without dissimulation.Romans 12:9. (Webster’s Dictionary of the American Language, 1828)

–=–

Inverse to dissimulation, we find probity:

PROBITY – noun – [Latin probitas, from probo, to prove.] Primarily, tried virtue or integrity, or approved actions; but in general, strict honesty;sincerity;veracity; integrity in principle,or strict conformity of actions to the laws of justice.Probity of mind or principle is best evinced by probity of conduct in social dealings, particularly in adhering to strict integrity in the observance and performance of rights called imperfect, which public laws do not reach and cannot enforce.(Webster’s Dictionary of the American Language, 1828)

–=–

If it is not now plainly obvious, these two terms and their dueling meanings describe polar opposites.

Dissimulation defines a citizen-ship in persona (mask) governed by the state (legal law).

Probity defines a self-governing man under God’s Law, the Law of Nature.

Personhood is bound by strict law of men, having only a legal capacity to act in commerce and society as property of the state, while self-governing men must observe and perform the Highest Law at all times, lest they fall back into that legal matrix.

Of course, dissimulation (person-hood) is absolutely integral pillar for this fictional realm of legalism to exist in its own little world. Just as a cartoon character is a simulation disassociated from the Real World, so too must men be made to disassociate even themselves from what is Real (Truth) so as to be trapped within this legal construct. The law of legal fiction applies only to fictional persons (legally pretended characters), places (jurisdictions), and things (property). None of these are Real…

Dissimulation can also be called as agency.

The major difference between an attorney (assigned agent) and a public citzien-ship (acting agent) is dissimulation. While the attorney is consensually hired in agency, as a temporary agent employed to fulfill and perform certain legal duties in a limited legal contract, the public citizen-ship lives his whole civil life in an agency relationship. The citizen-ship never ceases to be an agent. In his mind he becomes the citizen, unable to distinguish between himself and the fictional character (person-hood) he plays in the legal, commercial realm. Nature and fiction are blurred and thus intermixed in all his dealings. The simulation and the Real are thus indistinguishable. The Truth is blended with the lie, causing the phenomenon of dissimulation. We believe we are legal persons.

We believe we are the mask (persona) instead of the man behind it.

The problem is that the mask (persona) is property (a legal status) of its creator. The mask belongs to government. Government is the lawmaker (god) over its own property. And while no government law (legal fiction) effects any man, its legal law does apply to its property — the legal person-hood (legal mask) worn/carried by the man. Like a puppet, the man is unconsciously drawn around by legal strings he cannot see and thus by laws he needs not morally agree with. For without this fictional connection to the Real man through a simulated character in the legal matrix, without a persona, the man would by necessity either need to be self-governing or be militarily enslaved. Thus, this legal matrix of nations is a sort of middle ground between the two, allowing individual men to choose the method of their enfranchisement in a severely limited way, causally choosing their own use in agency, just like in that computer simulation from The Matrix movies. But then, in that simulation of The Matrix, we find an almost 100% saturation rate of dissimulation — of people believing they are Free in Nature under God while in Reality stuck in an artificial womb they can never break free from.

Silent weapons For Quiet Wars are described in the introduction as “social engineering or the automation of society, i.e. the engineering of a social automation system (silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scalewithout implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e. slavery and genocide.” It also introduces the modern state of a somewhat permanent continuation of World War III as the “Quiet War,” and that it is currently and indefinitely “being conducted using subjective biological warfare, fought with silent weapons.” This document, dated from 1979, reads:

The Artificial Womb:

From the time a person leaves its mother’s womb, its every effort is directed towards building, maintaining, and withdrawing into artificial wombs, various sorts of substitute protective devices or shells. The objective of these artificial wombs is to provide a stable environment for both stable and unstable activity: to provide shelter for the evolutionary processes of growth, and maturity — i.e. survival; to provide security for freedom and to provide defensive protection for offensive activity. This is equally true of both the general public and the elite. However, there is a definite difference in the way each of these classes go about the solution of problems.

The Political Structure Of A Nation – Dependency:

The primary reason why the individual citizens of a country create a political structure is a subconscious wish or desire to perpetuate their own dependency relationship of childhood. Simply put, they want a human god to eliminate all risk from their life, pat them on the head, kiss their bruises, put a chicken on every dinner table, clothe their bodies, tuck them into bed at night, and tell them that everything will be alright when they wake up in the morning. This public demand is incredible,so the human god,the politician,meets incredibility with incredibility by promising the world and delivering nothing. So who is the bigger liar?The public?Or the godfather?This public behavior is surrender born of fear, laziness, and expediency. It is the basis of the welfare state as a strategic weapon, useful against a disgusting public.

–=–

Simulations (politicians) leading the dissimulated (citizenships)…

Welfare as a strategic weapon…

This lies in stark contrast to the Law of Nature, as the Law (Word) of God:

—=—

“…that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine(Law), Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith (Truth): so do. Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith (Truth) unfeigned: From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.”

—1 Timothy 1: 3-7, KJB

—=—

It is through dissimulation, through the agentic relationship of person-hood, that we have been turned away from our Natural course.

To be clear, let us explore what it is to lie in agency, especially under the tyranny of kings, popes, and the democracies (illiterate mob rule). Remember, while a person (status in society) is a legalistic simulation, believing in the false truth of the simulation and thus becoming one with it is dissimulation.

DUMMY – adjective –Sham; make-believe; pretended; imitation. As respects basis for predicating liability on parent corporation for acts of subsidiary, “agency,” “adjunct,” “branch,” “instrumentality,” “dummy,” “buffer,” and “tool” all mean very much the SAME thing. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

STRAWMAN – 1. A weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted. 2. A person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction.(Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary)

STRAWMAN – A front,a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purposes of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition)

STRAWMAN – 1. A fictitious person,especially one that is weak or flawed. 2. A tenuous and exaggerated counterargument that an advocate puts forward for the sole purpose of disproving it. — Also termed straw-man argument. 3. A third party used in some transactions as a temporary transferee to allow the principal parties to accomplish something that is otherwise impermissible. 4. A person hired to post a worthless bail bond for the release of an accused. Also termedsteaminess homo. (Black’s Law Dictionary 7th Edition)

STRAMINEUS HOMO: “Latin. A man of straw, one of NO SUBSTANCE,put forward as BAIL OR SURETY.” (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

AGENCY – A RELATION, created either by EXPRESS OR IMPLIED CONTRACT or by law, whereby one party (called the principal or constituent) delegates the transaction of some lawful business or the authority to do certain acts for him or in relation to his rights or property,with more or less discretionary power, to another person (called the agent, attorney,proxy, or delegate) who undertakes to manage the affair and render him an account thereof. The contract of agency may be defined to be a contract by which one of the contracting parties confides the management of some affair, to be transacted on his account, to the other party, who undertakes to do the business and render an account of it. A contract by which one person, with greater or less discretionary power, undertakes to represent another in certain business relations.A relation between two or more persons, by which one party, usually called the agent or attorney, is authorized to do certain acts for, or in relation to (lie rights or property) of the other, who is denominated the principal, constituent, or employer.(Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

–=–

The agency relationship of public US citizenships is simple: The principal (government) creates and employs a citizen-ship status (fictional persona) within its own created jurisdiction (fictional place), by which men (acting agents) use this commercial vessel (property) to conduct business and commerce. Essentially, a citizen is an employee of its employer (principal), and does all actions through that principal and its protections. This is why insurance is mandatory for citizenships (commercial vessels) of the United States, just as auto-insurance is mandatory to rent a car (commercial vehicle). If the agent crashes the car, the principal is responsible for the actions of its agents. Insurance alleviates that commercial burden, and is thus a legal requirement to dis-associate the liability of the principal from its agent, the employer from its employee, the user from its program (see the movie Tron).

To end this particular discourse on the 2nd pillar of fiction, we must address how God (Jehovah) Itself has been driven from our consciousness. It is foolish to argue over the Existence of God (Jehovah), when the very intent and definition of this VERB “Jehovah” is as the Universe, as all of Existence Itself in its infinite entirety. This state of Life in Nature then is the eternity of Being, again used as a verb to mean all of Existence as it stands at this and every moment. God (jehovah), in other words, is all that is Real, all that is not man-made. This is to say that Jehovah (God) is the Source of everything Real that can be simulated and dissimulated from. Jehovah (God) is Truth, thus all lies are dependent upon Reality, without which there would be no Reality (Truth) to lie about, and therefore no reason or source for such simulations. Without Truth there simply is no lie. Without Jehovah there simply is no satan (adversary). Again, this line of reasoning is self-evident.

If simulation is the opposite of Truth, and Jehovah (God) is defined as that which is the very Nature and Source of Truth, then we must recognize that each of us are a part of Jehovah. Without this understanding of the meaning of this word, as the substance of the very Source of Life Itself, and that by our very own Existence we are therefore each an intricate part of that whole of the concept of what is Jehovah (all of Being), we may never overcome that which dissimulates us from our very own Nature and place within It. Without faith (belief) in Jehovah as the only Reality of Truth and Life, we will forever be stuck in a man-made simulation of that which Is Jehovah.

But don’t believe me. Believe the Law as written in the Bible:

–=–

“God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;Neither is worshipped with men’s hands,as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things…”

–Acts 17:24-25, KJB

–=–

Jehovah is the air and the water and the land and the stars we so take for granted, as that which gives us life and breath and sustenance to Exist. Religions are a simulation of the Bible, a lie told to dissimulate us from our God (Reality/Nature) and Its Law, from our very Nature of Existence and place within It.

But we must be careful and weary of such a spiritual understanding, for the men that seek to be as replacement gods (magistrates) on Earth and in their own hand-built temples give only artificial, legal life (false existence) to simulated persons (legal statuses), places (legal jurisdictions), and things (legal properties), over which the only means of control is through dissimulation from the One True God (as “Jehovah”). For none of these Exists in Nature (under God), and so none can be governed by the Law of Nature.

In the end, we may understand why it is that we may only have one God, and that we must choose between the God (verb) of Nature (Jehovah) and the god (noun/title) of mammon. And so in Part Three of this essay series, we will examine how the legal fiction of nations would fall under its own weight without the dissimulation created by the god (false existence) of mammon (artificial valuation) and its engrossing, nihilistic, empty tool of money (the currency of time).

Until then, may your gradual awakening from these four pillars of fiction be sufficiently painful and gut-wrenching that your own dis-ease of dis-simulation is cured. And as the legal superstructure falls further into dis-pair and thus dis-repair, dragging along with it all those dissimulated masses of men unable to break from that virtual, simulated copy of reality, may your spiritual awakening be strong enough to match and defend against the adversarial dark awakening happening simultaneously and adversarially to your own. For the darkness of dissimulation is coming online, as artificial intelligence, as an out of control matrix of lies. It is the legal mind unburdened by any higher, moral law, set free to recreate the world as it sees fit.

May your meekness be evident and your will to preserve that which gives us Life be stronger than that dissimulated force that seeks to dispose us of It.

If you’ve missed some of my past shows, including my three part series on the True history of the United States (#12, 13, 14), please revisit my archives where all my guest appearances and regularly hosted shows are archived:

Past guests on Red Pill Sunday School have included Patrick Jordan and Daniel, catching up on our adventures in our Republic Broadcasting days. I plan on doing more live shows from here on in, as requested, so stay tuned to this archives site for future guest announcements.

Check out the other shows, new and old, from Bill Cooper to Alan Watt to Hal Anthony, at the UCY.TV station: http://ucy.tv

This is a topic that serves as the perfect opportunity to utilize my book in its intended digital form, as a massive reference source to pull from as part of any researcher’s due diligence process. In fact, this entry could be seen as a summary of the book series. Many of the quotes and sources below were harvested from my 1st book, which is free to download in pdf form at (StrawmanStory.info). This serves as a perfect opportunity to put to rest all the fallacious rhetoric out there of exactly what a strawman is, what its creator is, and to whom it applies.

Today’s topic: what is a “Taxpayer,” and what relation is a “taxpayer” to a “straw man,” why the truth/patriot movement has it all wrong, and why the IRS is so intent on making sure each of us remain without comprehension through its own official publications? As we will see in the IRS published whitewash paper below, the best way for government and its agencies to hide facts is to hide those facts behind the public’s misinterpretation of them. What government needs propaganda when its citizen-ships are creating their own lies and calling them as mainstream or alternative truths?

Firstly, we must get to the root of just what this legal “strawman” is. In its simplest explanation, we merely need to understand the legal (artificial) concept of personhood as compared to what is Real. For a man’s persona (mask) is never actually the man (as form without substance). In short, the legal term strawman is merely the personification (legal identity) of a classic strawman argument — a logical fallacy brought into artificial (legal) existence as a fictional, commercial vessel. And when we go to court, we present ourselves as if we actually are the mask (persona) we legally operate in, which is legally called as an appearance. The actual Living (True) man appears as an actor (agent) in personification (mask) of a legal entity created by and thus property of government, from which he or she makes legal arguments and accepts administrative decisions. When we go to court, we put this strawman forward as bail and act in surety (puppet master) to it, causing us to be bound by whatever judgement is placed upon it (the person/legal identity). To be clear, all legal law (government) applies only to the strawman, the government’s created property, never to any man… unless that is he is acting in surety to that person (property). When we rent a car (vessel), are we not bound by the law of government (law of the road) and by the rules of the owner of that property? As surety for that person (property/commercial vessel of government), whatever is assigned as punishment for the person (strawman) is thus sanctioned and thus put upon (imposted) upon the man (actor/agent) using that persona in commerce.

And so the strawman argument has been turned into a seemingly realistic and inseparable part of the man in surety to it, causing the appearance of responsibility for the actions and contractual (legal) obligations assigned to it, including the entirety of the US CODE when proven applicable to the person (strawman).

And so the court’s argument is essentially this: the strawman committed a legal (fictional) crime in the fictional (legal) realm we created, and though no actual harm has happened to anyone or anything in Reality, in Nature, we are charging the strawman (person) with a legal crime against another legal (fictional) person, place, or thing, and therefore as surety to that strawman (person), we expect you to pay for the strawman’s crime!

And so we can see that the court just personified a logical fallacy. It created a strawman (artificial, legal identity in form but no substance) at the time of your Live Birth, induced you to use that persona (status) in life to receive benefits and legal “consumer protections,” and so convinced you that this is actually your identity in Reality, in a voluntary agency relationship, and then expects you to be responsible for any extortions, exactions, punishments and pains it prescribes to that fictional, legal persona (mask), which again is all government (corporate) property.

To appear in the jurisdiction of a the United States (district corporation) is to appear in legal form only, without substance (without blood), the very definition of a straw man. For, as defined, what is made of straw is a metaphor that means without substance. To be clear, all legal persons, places, and things (nouns/names) are without substance. Nothing legal is Real. What is legal does not Exist in Nature. It is only ever a creation of man, and defines the forces of Nature as an “Act of God” in all insurance policies, or in other words, not an act of the state (fiction) or any of its property (persons, places, or things). An “Act of God,” then, is never the act of a strawman (person), nor is it an act of man. The point here is to understand that government recognizes and defines “God” (Jehovah) as a higher power, a sovereign authority and Law than itself, and that it and its persons (property) stand helpless before an Act of God (Reality/Nature), and therefore its fictional insurance (based in mammon) cannot cover any damages caused to fictional things (legal property) unless a specific Act of God is covered (i.e. “earthquake insurance,’ “flood insurance”).

Indeed, the maxims (principles) of law clearly show this to be True:

–=–
Maxims On God
–=–

“An act of God does wrong to no one.“

“The act of God does no injury;
that is, no one is responsible for inevitable accidents.”

“No one is held to answer for the effects of a superior force,or of an accident, unless his own fault has contributed.”

–=–
Maxims On Appearance
–=–

“He who does anything through another (e.g. a person/strawman),is considered as doing it himself.”

“What does not appear does not exist,and nothing appears judicially before judgment.”

“Fact not appearing is presumed not to exist.”

“Concerning things not appearing and things not existing,the rule (reasoning, conclusion) is the same.”

“A thing which is not made to appear is regardedas if it could not be made to appear and did not therefore exist.”

“The court has nothing to do with what is not before it.”

–=–

A man cannot appear (have artificial life/existence) in fiction, just as a cartoon cannot appear (have artificial life/existence) anywhere but in the fictional cartoon realm. A legal persona (status) only “exists” in legal fiction. Thus, a man must pretend to appear in fiction (the artificial, legal jurisdiction of any court) by pretending to be a person (fictional character) in that legal (anti-Real/anti-Nature) realm. Without this fictional (legal) appearance by the puppet master, the puppet (person) is said to have not appeared.

THE VOLUNTARY CONNECTION AND ADMIXTURE OF REALITY TO FICTION MUST BE ESTABLISHED FOR THE LAWS OF FICTION (THE PERSON) TO BE APPLIED TO REALITY (THE MAN).

This is accomplished by attaching a legal surname (last name) to the first (christian) name, the word “last” carrying the meaning of last intention, or last will and testament (declared law). In law, the first name is considered as a God-given gift, a part of Nature, while the last name (Latin agnomen) is property of the state. This admixture of names, of fiction and Nature, is strictly forbidden by the Bible (Natural Law). Without this admixture of names, being registered (taxable) property of government, then the man (by first name only) is too ambiguous to be identified as a legal entity making an appearance. Appearance of a legal person requires the full, legal name to be answered to in volunteerism.

AGENCY – Includes every relation in which one person acts for or represents another by latter’s authority, where one person acts for another, either in the relationship of principal and agent, master and servant,or employer or proprietor and independent contractor… Properly speaking, agency relates to commercial or business transactions. (–Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition)

RELATION – …The connection of two persons,or their situation with respect to each other, who are associated, whether by the law, by their own agreement, or by kinship,in some social status or union for the purposes of domestic life; as the relation of guardian and ward, husband and wife,master and servant, parent and child; so in the phrase “domestic relations.” The doctrine of “relation” is that principle by which an act done at one time is considered by an fiction of law to have been done at some antecedect period… A recital, account, narrative of facts;information given. (–Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition)

CONTROL – noun – Power or authority to manage, direct, superintend, restrict, regulate, direct, GOVERN,administer, or oversee. The “control” involved in determining ‘whether “principal and agent relationship” or “master and servant relationship” is involved must be accompanied by power or right to order or direct. – verb – …To control a thing is to have the rlght to exercise a directing or GOVERNING influence over it.(–Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition)

GOVERN – To direct and CONTROL the actions or conduct of,either by established laws or by arbitrary will; to direct and control, rule, or regulate, by authority. To be a rule, precedent, law or deciding principle for.

MASTER AND SERVANT – The relation of master and servant exists where oneperson, for pay or other valuable consideration, enters into the service of another and devotes to him his personal labor for an agreed period… It usually contemplates employer’s right to prescribe end and direct means and methods of doing work. (–Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition)

VOLUNTEER – One who receives a voluntary conveyance, that is, a conveyance made without a good or valuable consideration.(–William C Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

VOLUNTEER – A person who gives his services without any express or implied promise of remuneration. One who intrudes himself into a matter which does not concern him, or one who pays the debt of another without request,when he is not legally or morally bound to do so, and when he has no interest to protect in making such payment… One who, acting on his own initiative, pays debt of another without invitation, compulsion, or the necessity of self-protection. One who merely offers his service on his own free will,as opposed to one who is conscripted. Also AN ATTORNEY (AGENT), as to any persons other than those by whom he was retained. (Under the) Law of Master and Servant – The term “Volunteer” includes one who, without the assent of the master and without justification arising from a legitimate personal interest,unnecessarily assists a servant in the performance of the master’s business.

WILLFUL – Proceeding from a conscious motion of the will;voluntary. Intractable; having a headstrong disposition to act by the rule of contradiction. Obstinate; perverse.Intending the result which actually comes to pass; designed; intentional;not accidental or involuntary. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

INVOLUNTARY – Without will or power of choice; opposed to volition or desire. An involuntary act is that which is performed with constraint (q. v.) or with repugnance, or without the will to do it. An action is involuntary, then, which is performed under duress.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

PERSONA – Latin. In the civil law. Character, in virtue of which certain rights belong to a man and certain duties are imposed upon him. Thus one man may unite many characters,(personæ) as, for example, the characters of father and son, of master and servant. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

PERSONA CONJUNCTA ÆQUIPARATUR INTERESSE PROPRIO – A personal connection[literally, a united person,union with a person] is equivalent to one’s own interest; nearness of blood is as good a consideration as one’s own interest.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

PERSONA EST HOMO CUM STATU QUODAM CONSIDERATUS – A person is a man considered with reference to a certain STATUS.(–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

NATIONALITY – That QUALITY or CHARACTER which arises from the fact of a person’s BELONGING to a nation or state.Nationality determines the political STATUS of the individual, especially with reference to allegiance; while domicile determines his civil STATUS. Nationality arises either by birth or by naturalization. (–Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)

–=–

Remember that government also acts as a person (corporation) too, and that your relation to it can only be identified by the person (individual) you accept willfully under the doctrine of master and servant (volunteerism) and as agent for service of process to it as the person’s principal. Your relation to government exists only as a legal persona (status) or not at all. And you may only appear to government as its proprietary person (legal status) or as that of a foreign person (legal status), which is merely the person (property) of another legal nation, country, state, etc. (corporations). The difference? An employee is paid for his service, while a citizenship is exacted (extorted) and taxed for his service and reciprocal receipt of legal benefits and protections. But the term employee is merely a title placed upon a person, not a man. All legal titles can only be attached to legal persons, places, and things, but nothing in the Reality of Nature is ever actually its legally prescribed name or title. However, in Nature, it is only man that may choose his path, to follow the Law of God or to follow the anti-God, anti-Nature legal law of men.

–=–

“Assemble yourselvesand come; draw near together,ye that are escaped of the nations: they have no knowledge that set up the wood of their graven image, and pray unto a god that cannot save.”

—Isaiah 45:20, KJB

–=–

On that note, it is important to note that by default all men are considered to be “christian” in the Biblical sense, not as a standing, corporate religion or denomination, but as free men assumed by default to follow the Law of God, also called the True Natural Law. After all, man is of Nature, thus his Highest Law (Source) is thus considered to stem from the Creator (God) of Nature. Thus we may understand the notion that “all men are created equal.” However, once a man gives up his God-given rights and accepts the person (property) of another false god (nation), the man looses such Natural Rights, for nothing of Nature (God) exists in or respects anything in fiction. Keep in mind that only a man can be a follower of christ, as a True christian. A person is a fiction, a puppet, and cannot do anything without being driven by a man. This is why religions are, every one of them, as legally created corporations of the state, false. For they are attended by men acting in person (legal fiction), and over and over we are told that God respects no persons (fictions). Religions teach what they are required to teach as corporations of the state, which is to, above all else, follow the “law of the land,” meaning the law of man. This is, of course, absolutely opposed to the Law of God (Natural Law).

All men are indeed Created equal in Nature (under God), for no man is born with a status (persona) in Reality. But persons are legal creations of men, and are created specifically to be unequal, and to place upon them flattering titles of false (legal) authority and license (anarchy/lawlessness toward the Natural Law). To be clear, the fallacious term “equal rights” merely means that all persons (statuses) of (belonging to) the United States shall be EQUALLY PUNISHED UNDER THE LAW.

–=–

“The only right a Christian has is to give up his rights.”

–Oswald Chambers

–=–

“No greater mischief can happen to a Christian people,
than to have God’s word taken away from them, or falsified,
so that they no longer have it pure and clear.”

–Martin Luther

–=–

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

–=–

Volunteerism is performance without coercion. Citizenship is a performance debt (tacit contract of use) entered into voluntarily, just as an employee (servant) is a hired volunteer by the employer (master), for the employee is submissive (servant) to the will of the employer (master). The difference between the laws (doctrines) of “master and servant” and of “principal and agent” is that an agent is a representation of the principal. Indeed, an employee acts as an agent of its employer (principal) when the employee does business (commerce) in his master’s (employer’s/principal’s) name. In interstate commerce, a citizenship of the United States is an agent in all commercial affairs, and the 50 state governments are considered as foreign, third parties to any and all commercial activity. Government considers us to be in agency at all times, 24/7, as a default and without exception. This is, of course, a prima facie (surface) presumption, which is rebuttable.

An Act of God cannot “appear” in court (fictional jurisdiction). Only a fictional entity (legal status/person) may “appear” in the fiction (jurisdiction) of that court. If the man in surety does not answer to a legal name called out by the court, which identifies the man as surety to that person (property) of government, then the court cannot administrate its own property (person). The case cannot go forward without the agent in surety to the person being present by making an appearance (pretending to be the person). The only exception to this rule is the an attorney (agent) may appear in representation (simulation) of the person without the man in surety being present in the court.

The term injury, or in-jury, simply means that the “act” in question cannot be pulled into a court of law infant of a judge or jury, that one cannot take “God” or Nature to court. Silly as this sounds, we must acknowledge this system as it stands, not as we wish it to be. To injure means to bring into or under legal law. Thus what is an act of God (Nature) can do no wrong and can injure nothing fictional, for what is Real, what is of Nature, is always considered a “Creation” or Act of God. To support this notion, we find that nothing in Nature, nothing in its Natural state of Life or Existence can be patented. To work around this aspect, which comes from the Natural Law — that God’s Creation is God’s (sovereign) property higher than man’s authority to claim it, meaning that property does not exist in Nature, only in man’s legal fiction — the government issues license to “scientific” corporations and persons with the legal flattering title of “scientists” to re-create by genetic alteration, causing the Source of what Exists to be considered by the legal realm of artificial law as “manmade,” and no longer an act of God. And this is why our entire surface world, the Creation of God, from plants to animals to man, is being genetically altered to the point of being unrecognizable as a Creation or Act of God, and thus patentable as government property. This includes our genes.

While no legal (artificial) law applies to any man or to anything of God’s Creation in Nature (Reality), any man acting voluntarily (contractually) in the agency of and appearing as a registered legal persona (proprietary individual or corporation, etc.) of government is bound to all legal laws that apply to that person (strawman), just as one would be bound to the rules and laws encapsulating a rental car (rented commercial vessel). The courts address only persons, not men, and men may only address the courts in persona or in agency (as attorney) of the person, never as one’s True Self.

And so the strawman argument of the legitimacy of legal law by government in all its institutions, agencies, and departments is directed not at anything Real or of Nature, but only ever at the strawman persona (mask) that each man pretends and appears to be. For all legal persons, places, and things are property of (creations of) government. When we appear in court, in persona, we are misrepresenting ourselves as that which we are not — as that which we physically cannot be — as that which is artificial (legal). And so all proceedings against us will also be based upon this personified mis-representation of us, which is legally defined as a straw man.

The legal system simply has no power over any man unless that man acts in the property (person) of that legal system and its government. Without this contractual volunteerism (also known as the doctrine of master and servent) the true colors of each government would shine through, revealing the only avenue of control over men (Reality) left to it, which is strictly violent, military oppression and thus forced suppression. Dictatorship, as a direct and obvious force over men, not persons.

The court never addresses any man unless he stands in agency (attorney) for a person, as only a strawman that is created and thus bound by the creators (courts) law. A strawman is not of Nature, and so has no “God-given rights” referred to as the Natural Law. A strawman is bound to the law of persons, not the Law of Nature, for a strawman is never Created in Nature (by God). A strawman (person) is not “God-given,” and no law of Nature (Reality) can protect anything artificial (manmade), as that which is not a Creation of the Source of Nature.

He who controls the fiction controls the Real it re-presents.

He who dictates history controls what is the false (legal) truth (history) about the Real.

Thus, he who’s history is dictated by the information (form without substance) of the artificial creation of a legal entity created and registered by a legal birth certificate is the Real misrepresented and so controlled by the fiction (person) and its law.

Happy legal birth-day, strawman…

–=–

While we will get to the aforementioned IRS publication spoken of soon enough, we must have this further foundation in law to understand why it is fallacious. And so let us now equate just what a “taxpayer” is in conjunction to a “strawman.” Is a taxpayer Real, or is it a creation of the legal system and its government? Obviously a “taxpayer” is a title, and is certainly not part of what is self-evident and self-existent in Nature (Reality). And of course, what is a creation of the artifice must be defined by that artifice as its false creator god, giving it existence only by the words used to describe and bind it into legal word magic. In the end, a title is useless unless it can be placed upon and bound to in surety that which it is intended to subject or modify. No man holds any title, for titles don’t exist in Nature. No man is ever a “taxpayer.” Only a strawman (person) may hold such a title of flattery.

–=–

“The taxpayer — that’s someone who works for the federal government but doesn’t have to take the civil service examination.”

–-President Ronald W. Reagan

–=–

“…the taxpayermust be liable for the tax. Tax liability is a condition precedent (prior) to the demand.Merely demanding payment, even repeatedly,does not cause liability.”

–Terry v. Bothke, 713 F.2d 1405, at 1414 (1983)

–=–

“A precedent condition, in law, is a condition which must happen or be performed before an estate or some right can vest, and on failure of which the estate or right is defeated.“

–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828

–=–

“Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.”

Just what does it mean to be taxed? What is a “taxpayer?” And are you or I one of them?

Remember, no man is ever a “taxpayer,” for no man is ever a person. Man must respect persons and flattering titles (property of government) before they can be assigned to him in the legal realm. Of course the foundational, Natural Law in scripture is very clear:

That’s right, in one tiny verse the Bible just told us exactly why we are enslaved, because we respect persons (including corporations and governments) and flattering titles (including citizen and taxpayer). For only through the artificial persona and title may the good man be overcome.

–=–

“It is not good to accept the person of the wicked,to overthrow the righteous in judgement.”

All positions of power, of godship in magistracy, be it that of kings to presidents to congressmen to judges to mayors to police officers, comes strictly from the flattery of legal status (persona/mask) and of artificial flattery (titles, entitlements). But do not be fooled, for the flattery of titles extends to the “middle class,” the “common folk,” and “the poor” as well. These states of being do not Exist in Nature, unless Nature is made unavailable to those lower classes by the higher classes, causing dependence upon money instead of upon Nature (Source) Itself.

–=–

“And his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honor of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries(titles).”

—Daniel 11:21, KJV

–=–

“For the vile person will speak villainy, and his heart will work inequity,to practice hypocrisy,and to utter error against the Lord,to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail.”

—Isaiah 32:6

–=–

It is to be in error to call oneself as something one is not. In the Bible, we are taught to be content with merely being, as I AM. I AM part of God, and God alone is my Sovereign Master and Lawmaker. I stress again that this is recognized as the Highest Law by government. Only a fool would dismiss the Bible when all roads lead to it, when it is used to swear oath upon, and when the word God is mentioned so many times in both constitutions and in law, especially as “Acts of God.” What fool would not seek the definition and deeper meaning of the word God when his government states that God exists and is responsible for such inevitable and helpless “Acts?”

I can answer that, for we have all been made the fool by the organized, corporate church and state. I was the fool. But now I see…

When in the scripture stories Caesar stated that “all the world should be taxed,” this translation into English (dog-Latin) was left purposefully incomplete to say the least by the kings scribes, causing a purposeful mis-transliteration of the intent of that word. When we seek the True intent of this verse, we find in Strong’s Concordance and Thayer’s Greek Lexicon the difference between the Bible’s (Higher) language and the common, vulgar tongue of the mass of illiterates speaking dog-Latin (English), or what Mark Twain called as a “mongrel language” that borrowed its form from all others while extricating away the substance of poetic, metaphoric, and beautiful meaning for a more modern and cold literalism. Ask any speaker of the Greek language, for instance, and they will tell you that Greek is impossible to be Truly understood or communicated into the low form of English.

To be “taxed” (as it is translated) is not merely the exaction and extortion of money as we politically consider it. For as we just read above, to be taxed as a “taxpayer” one must first be identified as a “taxpayer,” and into this flattering title no man is ever merely born in Nature. It applies only to persons. One must first be militarily conquered, defeated, or purchased (as a volunteer) before one can be liable for such a tax. In other words, everything must be legally named (placed into noun form) so that the name (property) may be thus extorted. The precedent must exist before the tax can be applied.

Let us read again from above:

–=–

“…the taxpayer must be liable for the tax. Tax liability is a condition precedent (prior) to the demand. Merely demanding payment, even repeatedly, does not cause liability.”

–Terry v. Bothke, 713 F.2d 1405, at 1414 (1983)

–=–

It is not the man, but the persona (mask) governed (controlled) as property that it is liable for taxation. Taxation is a fee for the use of government property, namely for the use of its unique money system and fiat paper (credit). And so it was then in the day of Caesar as it is today in the United Nations and its Agenda 2030, a plan specifically purposed with the intention to tax (register as a legal identity) the entire planet, all the billions that even now Exist in Reality (Nature) without legal (government registered) name and title. In other words, the whole population of the world has been declared by the UN just as it was by Caesar — that it must be taxed!

But first, the precedent of proprietary global citizenship must be set worldwide, that all men may be extorted through taxation.

—=—

World Bank:

“Overview: Providing legal identity for all (including birth registration) by 2030 is a target shared by the international community as part of the Sustainable Development Goals (target 16.9). The World Bank Group (WBG) has launched the Identification for Development (ID4D) cross-practice initiative to help our client countries achieve this goal and with the vision of making everyone count: ensure a unique legal identity and enable digital ID-based services to all.”

—United Nations 2030 Agenda, from a World Bank publication entitled, “Identification for Development”

“No community should be considered to be outside the span of this new agenda. Whatever your ethnicity, whatever your livelihood, whatever your lifestyle or location, all of you are inside the agenda. We need to inform everyone that these goals are the heart of a plan for the future of the worlds people, as well as for the planet itself… PEACE AND SECURITY,human rights and justice, and sustainable development, brought together within this 2030 agenda.”

—David Nabarro, Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General of the United Nations, from a speech on April 15th, 2016

—Benjamin Franklin, for the Pennsylvania Assembly in its Reply to the Governor (11 Nov. 1755), later used as a motto upon the title page of ‘An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania’ (1759), published by Benjamin Franklin, authored by Richard Jackson

–=–

“As distrust, in some sense, is the mother of safety, so security is the gate of danger. A man had need to fear this most of all, that he fears not at all.”

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing,but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”

—Matthew 7: 15, KJB

–=–

“International Day of Peace, 21 September 2017: Together for Peace, Respect, Safety, and Dignity for all.”

–United Nations document, from: (UN.org/peaceday)

–=–

“For when they shall say, PEACE AND SAFETY; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape… Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.”

—1 Thessalonians 5: 3 & 5-6, KJB

–=–

“And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full,a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up. And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people. And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, AND BY PEACE SHALL DESTROY MANY; he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.”

—Daniel 8: 23-25, KJB

–=–

“The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD.”

—Proverbs 21:31, KJB

–=–

INSURE–

“To make sure or secure,to guarantee, as, to insure safety to any one.To engage to indemnify a person against pecuniary loss from specified perils.To act as an insurer.” (Black4)

–=–

“He who is SURETY to a stranger will smart (be put in pain) for it.”

–Proverbs 11:15

–=–

STRAMINEUS HOMO:

“Latin. A MAN OF STRAW, one of NO SUBSTANCE,put forward as bail or SURETY.“

—Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, definition of Steaminess Homo

–=–

To tax all the men of the world, first the world must be reimagined (made into a legal realm as an international jurisdiction) — and all men must be re-created into legal persons (property) of every nation united. All men must be given Social Security through the United Nations, which is already present in over 140 nations through the International Social Security Association (ISSA) of the United Nations. One must be given a benefit before one can be voluntarily controlled (governed) and thus taxed for use of another’s property. And to receive any benefit from government, one must first assume the persona (subjection) of fiction it is attached to. And so the goal of registration (taxing) of all men in to fictional personhood is scheduled to happen by 2030 — the date that a global debtor’s prison is thus established, as hell on earth.

HELL – The name formerly given to a place under the exchequer (treasury) chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined.(Black4)

–=–

One need not confine men in prisons when they are bound to a performance debt wishing the jurisdictions (invisible walls) of nations.

But what does this word taxed actually mean when used by both Caesar in the Bible and by the United Nations? What was its intention in the scriptural texts?

Firstly, let’s break the fallacious notion that taxes are definitely not just the way it is nor as certain as death. Only public-minded, non compos mentis slaves think in this defeatist way, that what is artificial is a certainty (Reality), which is why most common citizenships pay their taxes on a regular basis. But to be taxed implies much, much more…

1. To write off, copy (from some pattern)
2. To enter in a register or records

1. Specifically, to enter in public records the names of men, their property and income
2. To enroll

–=–

Quoting further from Thayer’s Greek Lexicon:

“apographō (taxed)… To have one’s self registered, to enroll one’s self…those whose names are inscribed in the heavenly register, Hebrews 12:23
(the reference is to the dead already received into the heavenly city,the figure being drawn from civil communities on earth,whose citizens are enrolled in a register).”

–=–

To copy, to simulate man into personhood… this is taxation. The registration of men into fictional, taxable (extort-able) characters in the legal fiction realm. It is a design to steal men away from their very Nature (God) and Law and to replace It with the false gods (idols) of the nations.

Here, as in most references in the Bible, the word dead or death is metaphorical, referring to a spiritual death of the soul while taxed (registered) in the person of the legal state and following its dead law in dead hands (mortmain) as dead pledges (mortgages). This state of spiritual death is caused by the following of the legal law over that of the Law of God (Nature). This is called, again, as personhood — to live a fictional (spiritually dead) life in pursuit of mammon (money and valuation) as a strawman.

And so we can see that no man owes any tax except he that agrees to be registered to any legal district (Caesar) voluntarily or is forced by other violent means. The term “taxpayer” is a title, representing a legal status, and is not of Nature (Reality). It is a creation of the state. It is not part of the Higher, moral Law of Nature. It is the result of coveting that which is artificial, namely what is referred to as the god of mammon, as the credit, debt, and valuation (love/belief) of and in money and its usage. For what is priceless (without or beyond artificial monetary value) cannot be taxed. And the maxims of law is clear that:

—=—

“The human body does not admit of valuation.”

—CORPUS HUMANUM NON RECIPIT AESTIMATIONEM. Hob. 59. (Black4)

—=—

“The body of a freeman does not admit of valuation.”

—Liberum corpus aestimationem non recipit. (BouvMaxim)

—=—

“That which is granted or reserved under a certain form, is not to be drawn into a valuation.”

“He that diligently seeketh good procureth favour:
but he that seeketh mischief, it shall come unto him.He that trusteth in his riches shall fall…”

—Proverbs 11: 27-28, KJB

—=—

Let us be clear, the flattering title of “taxpayer” is the placing of valuation upon a man through his strawman (persona/legal status), causing legal extortion of that human capital under governmental management (administrational law of persons). Once anything of Nature is so valued in mammon, it can never be Truly Free again in Nature until that value is discharged, for all that is Real is born (Created) priceless (without valuation). Only its name (noun – as a man-made, fictional person, place, or thing) and the artificial status that name creates can be controlled and thus validated as property of its creator. And only a name belonging to a corporate nation can be flatteringly titled as a “taxpayer,” never a Real man. Again, it is only man’s respect of persons and flattering titles that allows him to be taken in surety for the artificial crimes of the fictional strawman (person).

In other words, without respect of persons, no man may be voluntarily taxed under the burden and sanction (punishment) of the law of persons (contract).

Before we move on, let me put any fallacious arguments about just what volunteerism is to rest. To do this, let us just consider our so-called all-volunteer military. Yes, it is at this point in history a voluntary choice to join the armed (heraldic) services of the United States. But what happens to the volunteer once he has contracted to that military service? Does he walk around disobeying law and the orders of his superior officers just because he is a volunteer? No. And neither does a citizenship of any nation. The soldier has agreed to be under the doctrine of master and servant (volunteerism). To receive and use the flattering title and licenses (lawlessness) of “soldier” or “officer” one must follow the requirements and law of the granter of those titles, no matter how tyranical, for no Natural rights or protections may apply to fictional characters.

To be clear, to be a volunteer is not to have a magic word that allows one to break the law, even when that law is overtly immoral and outrageous to ones religious or True beliefs. Citizenship to the United States is a voluntary status (persona), and this point is not deferrable at bar. No force or gun is pointed at your head to be a citizen, only to follow the law that you voluntarily submitted to by becoming a citizen (a contractual relationship based on use of the person). See the difference?

For those begging the question of who exactly he or she “became a citizenship” of the United States, I urge you to read the confirmation and ratification sections of my book, Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person, so that you may comprehend the process. (See pages 581-586, free to download at StrawmanStory.info)

Certainly the actions we do or do not do under law as citizen-ships of the United States cause what is called presumption of law. If we use the property of another and gain benefits from that use then we are bound to the obligations as well of that usage, which implies a contractual relation-ship and system of law governing that obligatory debt. Debt is either monetary or performance-based, meaning that one must perform the duty (obligation) of the right and status granted, to follow a legal course in pursuit of disharmony in mammon instead of a Natural one in pursuit of harmony with God’s Nature. Thus what is prima facie (avoidable) is made legitimate (unavoidable) by use of these legal statuses (strawmen) assigned in a blanket fashion over the general population.

One example of the presumption of fact that verifies the common, public citizenship to be bound by and under this trust act comes from the New York Second Class Cities Law, §22:

–=–

Officers, trustees of public property:

“The common council and the several members thereof, and all officers and employees of the city are hereby declared trustees of the property, funds and effects of said city respectively, so far as such property, funds and effects are or may be committed to their management or control,and every taxpayer residing in said city is hereby declared to be a cestui que trust in respect to the said property, funds and effects respectively; and any co-trustee or any cestui que trust shall be entitled as against said trustees and in regard to said property, funds and effects to all the rules, remedies and privileges provided by law for any co-trustee or cestui que trust; to prosecute and maintain an action to prevent waste and injury to any property, funds and estate held in trust; and such trustees are hereby made subject to all the duties and responsibilities imposed by law on trustees, and such duties and responsibilities may be enforced by the city or by any co-trustee or cestui que trust aforesaid. The remedies herein provided shall be in addition to those now provided by law.”

—New York Second Class Cities Law, sub-Section 22, New York Code

–=–

So what does it mean to be considered on the face as part of a cestui qui trust?

It means you are considered as a consort of that which is dead (legal fiction) — not a man in legal consideration, but a registered person sometimes called as a straw man. It means you have been granted artificial life within a legal matrix system and its code; one created not by God but by Caesar (a false god/district).

—=—

“For all the gods of the nations are idols…”

—Psalms 96:5, KJB

—=—

The word god is merely a generic term that can mean many different things unless specifically qualified. A god is a magistrate. Caesar was a god. Obama and Trump are/were gods. The pope and queen and the legislators are gods. Remember, this is the realm of the legal (anti-Nature) law, a devolution of Reality into fictional characters played by men under flattering titles and statuses. It is a realm built entirely of straw. Thus, the cestui qui trust of dead persons (defective statuses) called citizen-ships of the United States (district/Caesar) are the followers of false gods, idolators, worshiping what is not the Reality of Nature (Creation), and instead embracing the fictional creations of men acting as and in the perpetual (immortal) legal office, title, and in the capacity of gods.

The reason that the King’s translators used the word “god” for all positions (flattering titles) of men in authority is simply because the word god implies sovereignty, the power of ruling over other men. This is a requirement of sovereignty, which is why no man is ever sovereign unless he respects persons and bears the flattering title of some corporation (nation/state).

DEVOLUTION – noun – [Latin] 1. The act of rolling down; as the devolution of earth into a valley. 2. Removal from one person to another; a passing or falling upon a successor.(Webs1828)

GOD – noun – …2. A false god; a heathen deity; an idol. Fear not the gods of the Amorites. Judges 6:10. 3. A prince; a ruler; a magistrate or judge;an angel. Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people. Exodus 22:28. Psalms 97:7… 4. Any person or thing exalted too much in estimation, or deified and honored as the chief good. Whose god is their belly. Philippians 3:19. – verb transitive – To deify… (Webs1828)

CREATOR – noun – [Latin] 1. The being or personthat creates. Remember thy creator in the days of thy youth. Ecclesiastes 12:1. 2. The thing that creates, produces or causes.(Webs1828)

SUPREME – adjective – [Latin supremus, from supra.] 1. Highest in authority;holding the highest place in government or power. In the United States, the congress is supreme in regulating commerce and in making war and peace. The parliament of Great Britain is supreme in legislation; but the king is supreme in the administration of the government. In the universe, God only is the supreme ruler and judge.His commands are supreme and binding on all his creatures. 2. Highest, greatest or most excellent; as supreme love; supreme glory; supreme degree. 3. It is sometimes used in a bad sense; as supreme folly or baseness, folly or baseness carried to the utmost extent. [A bad use of the word.] (Webs1828)

SOVEREIGN – adjective – suv’eran. [We retain this barbarous orthography from the Norman sovereign. The true spelling would be suveran from the Latin supernes, superus.] 1. Supreme in power;possessing supreme dominion; as a sovereign ruler of the universe. 2. Supreme; superior to all others; chief.God is the sovereign good of all who love and obey him. 3. Supremely efficacious; superior to all others; predominant; effectual; as a sovereign remedy. 4. Supreme; pertaining to the first magistrate of a nation; as sovereign authority. – noun – suv’eran. 1. A supreme lord or ruler; one who possesses the highest authority without control. Some earthly princes, kings and emperors are sovereigns in their dominions. 2. A supreme magistrate; a king. 3. A gold coin of England, value (of) $4.44. (Webs1828)

MAGISTERIAL – adjective – [See Magistrate.] Pertaining to a master;such as suits a master; authoritative. 1. Proud; lofty; arrogant; imperious; domineering. Pretenses go a great way with men that take fair words and magisterial looks for current payment. (Webs1828)

MAGISTRATE – noun – [Latin magistratus, from magister, master; magis, major, and ster, Teutonic steora, a director; steoran, to steer; the principal director.] A public civil officer,invested with the executive government or some branch of it. In this sense, a king is the highest or first magistrate as is the President of the United States. But the word is more particularly applied to subordinate officers, as governors, intendants, prefects, mayors, justices of the peace, and the like.The magistrate must have his reverence; the laws their authority. (Webs1828)

CESTUI QUE VIE – He whose life is the measure of the duration of an estate.The person for whose life any lands, tenements, or hereditaments are held. (Black4)

CESTUI QUE USE – He for whose use and benefit lands or tenements are held by another. The cestui que use has the right to receive the profits and benefits of the estate, but the legal title and possession (as well as the duty of defending the same) reside in the other. (Black4)

CESTUl QUE TRUST – He who has a right to a beneficial interest in and out of an estate the legal title to which is vested in another.The person who possesses the equitable right to property and receives the rents, issues, and profits thereof, the legal estate of which is vested in a trustee.Beneficiary of trust. (Black4)

CESTUl QUE TRUST – He for whose benefit another person is seised of lands or tenements or is possessed of personal property. He who has a right to a beneficial interest in and out of an estate the legal title to which is vested in another.He may be said to be the equitable owner, (and) is entitled therefore, to the rents and profits; may transfer his interest, subject to the provisions of the instrument creating the trust;may defend his title in the name of his trustee; but has no legal title to the estate, as he is merely a tenant at will if he occupies the estate; and may be removed from possession in an action of ejectment by his own trustee. See Trust. (Bouv1892)

–=–

This state of existence or being (legal status) in the legal realm is called spiritual death. It is to exist not under the God of Nature (Creation) but under men acting as gods, sovereigns, and supreme rulers, who claim dominion over all names and titles and statuses. They are the legal (artificial) gods and creators of straw men. This metaphoric term of being dead is of course severely mistranslated from the Bible, when in fact the scriptures (Law) is referring only to men following the legal law over the Law of God (Law and Laws of Nature). This spiritual death of citizenship to the nations and their gods is what must be shed to be “re-born” into Nature’s Realm and Law. There is nothing religious or strange about this act, being merely the shedding of any respect for all persons, places and things (names/nouns) assigned to Nature and thus placed over Reality to cause all men to follow false gods in the artifice (false creation). We seem to have no problem with the idea of coming out of The Matrix, because its a cool sciencefiction movie. But when it comes to the Real deal, the very action of coming out of this modern legal system of Babylon, well that’s just religiousfiction, right?

Oh, how wrong we have been…

Turns out it’s the Natural Law, the foundation. And the metaphor of The Matrix is exactly what the scriptural Law teaches one to avoid, revealing all traps and inducements thereof. For strawmen and taxpayers only have artificial life in the legal realm, the legal matrix of words in coded legalese. And it is no irony whatsoever the the legal definition for the word hell is as a debtor’s prison. For what is a nation but an open-air prison for performance debtors (legal persons)?

And so just what is a “taxpayer?”

Firstly, it is important to recognize that without money and its valuation upon all persons, places and things (names/nouns), there could be no tax. Thus, as with all evils, the love of money is the root of all taxation. Let us be clear that the word love is just another word meaning belief in and respect of. Respect of money (valuation in money) is the root of all evil. Belief in the value of money is the root of all evil. For what law in the United States is not based on money, its use, its users, or its rules — money (valuation) being the one and only product that each nation has a monopoly upon?

And yet what in Nature is Created or Born with a price? What needs money to Exist in Reality? Why nothing, of course. Only fiction and legality survives on money — the lifeblood of evil (artifice). So simple, yet so seemingly impossible to conceive, is a Reality without money (fiction). Strange days indeed…

Ok, so obviously a taxpayer is a registered user (legal person) of another’s property, namely the money and credit of the United States. That’s simple enough. But is that all it takes to also be a taxpayer? Of course not.

One owes no obligational “tax” to anyone but his master, his god, the sovereign creator of his pretended, fictional legal status in society. Pay to play. Of course, the creator (false god) of the status of “citizenship” and of “taxpayer” is certainly the legal state (district/Caesar), and modernly all the nations united under the World Bank, International Social Security Association, and other United Nations entities working to register (tax) every man on earth into a legal persona (strawman) by their “Agenda 2030” goal.

But what does this term “taxpayer” have to do with the term “strawman?”

Let’s find out…

An adversarial commenter (troll) on my blog was good enough to leave a link to a wonderfully deceitful information hit-piece on the use of the term “straw man” in a lame attempt to discredit my life’s work and research. Here’s the link:

In short, this laughable piece of sophistry is not ironically the IRS merely using a straw man argument (logical fallacy) to attempt to debunk the very legally recognized notion of just what a strawman actually is as defined in law. Essentially, when government calls any of us a “taxpayer” it is not only evoking but legally personifying a straw man argument, or more specifically an alternative flattering legal (artificial) title attached to the person (strawman) in law (as their own created fiction). In other words, the IRS is declaring us as surety to a dead entity under the doctrine of cestui due use and trust discussed above — as an already registered (taxed) entity (persona/property) of the state containing no substance (no blood) and thus no actual Life. It is styling us as dead (fictionally named and registered) persons that are its property, and doing so because we are the registered agents (actors) for service of process, or “he who is in surety to another.” Legal entities are of course always considered by law as dead, for the legal realm is the realm of dead persons, places, and things (property) of the legal fiction, or hell — as one existing without spiritual Life (without moral Law and choice) and thus outside of Nature (God) and It’s (God’s) Law. And this is of course why so many, including christ, were metaphorically risen from the dead in those moral scriptures, as those who rose above this legal, spiritual death back into Nature and It’s Highest Law, being re-born into their original intent and innocence (unblemished name) without persona (mask). To follow the legal law of men over the Highest Law of God, the Law of Nature, is to live a spiritually dead life in the person (property) of another.

Let us be clear that the Law of God and the law of man are whole recognized concepts in the legal realm, and that one is certainly higher in authority than the other. The word legal, in its Truest sense as man’s “positive law,” literally means not of Nature and in opposition to God, as the undoing of God’s Law. While this is explained in detail in my book, it is important to note that what is positive in law is that which is an addition by man. In other words, positive or legal law is wholly unnatural and always against the “negative” or self-existent and self-evident Law of Nature (God). Its whole purpose and intent is to bend the rules of Nature (of God).

POSITIVE LAW – Law proper, as opposed to moral laws, or to natural or “God-made” law. An enforceable legal rule which prohibits or requires certain conduct. Often contrasted with moral law.Lawyers speak of positive law to distinguish it from other rules similarly expected to be followed but not conduct-related. For example, many of the provisions of the Laws of Manu deal with morality or hygiene. This made it hard for jurists and legal historians to later sort out what was intended to be enforceable by the state, or which ought to influence the court on disputes over contracts or inter-personal relationships,and the moral or religious rules, which serve as guidance to the citizens but do not attract the attention of law enforcement. (–Lloyd Duhaime Legal Dictionary, online at duhaime.org)

–=–

In other words, the legal law is the law of the dead, of legal, artificial, fictional existence.

But more importantly, it outlaws the Law of Nature, causing men to act not according to the moral law or even to their religious beliefs, but instead dictating the conduct of their persona (status in society) to which men must oblige in surety for the performance debt to their strawman (government property). The benefits of citizenship require us to act in evil (artifice) and respect fictional persons and fake, flattering titles against the foundational Law of Nature (Source). One simply cannot have two gods, which is just code for the fact that man cannot have two conflicting and opposing systems of law.

One does not choose ones God.

One chooses one’s Law, which thus proves the sovereignty of one’s God in all matters Real and legal. And so one may only declare the rights of whatever Law they have chosen, in the name of that Law’s Creator. And God respects no fiction!

The whole point is to cause spiritual death to all men by causing all men to abandon their very own Nature (God) so as to place them under the retention and distraint of the legal law of the district (Caesar).

–=–

“[I.] Cestui que vie remaining beyond Sea for Seven Years together and no Proof of their Lives, Judge in Action to direct a Verdict as though Cestui que vie were DEAD… in every such case the person or persons upon whose life or lives such Estate depended shall be accounted as NATURALLY DEAD, And in every Action brought for the recovery of the said Tenements by the Lessors or Reversioners their Heires or Assignes, the Judges before whom such Action shall be brought shall direct the Jury to give their Verdict as if the person soe remaining beyond the Seas or otherwise absenting himselfe were DEAD…“

“[IV.] If the supposed dead Man prove to be alive,thenthe Title is revested. Action for mean Profits with Interest.

It is very important to note that one may instantly know one’s status (persona/mask) in legal society by the “term” of one’s proprietary estate (property holdings) there in. To be clear, if property is held for any term of definable time, including that which is called the “life of the man” in persona, then this is property held by a dead, legal person, a strawman (a fictional man of no substance) under a limited contract. And so we must know the difference between the Life of a man and the pretended, spiritually dead, fictional life of a person. The dead (Cestui Que Vie) strawman simply cannot hold property, and may only use and enjoy (but not dispose of) another’s property.

—=—

LIFE:

“26. The state of being in force, or the term for which an instrument has legal operation; as the life of an execution.”

—Definition for ‘life’ from: Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language (Webs1828)

—=—

Land or property that is held on one’s own right is passed by blood to one’s heirs, and so is not dependent upon any time constraints, for blood is an immortal (inheritable) natural right in law. It’s really that simple. For a person (strawman) has no blood! A person (proprietary granted status) may only have legal (artificial) life (operation) as long as some man (with actual, Natural Life) is there to steer and be surety for that persona (mask/legal status/title). The death of the man represents the figurative death of the being or fictional life-force of the person, which is called an execution of contract (of legal life). This is legal death, not Natural death. Those who “rose from the dead” became spiritual alive under the Law of God. But they did not ever actually die in Real Life, just lifted themselves out of the spiritual death of Caesar’s taxation (registration of personhood) and that legal system of false law and fiction. This is the metaphor of spiritual awakening (going from spiritual death in fictional civil life to spiritual Life), the choice to follow only God’s Law of Nature and no other god (law).

And so finally, obviously, a “taxpayer” is thus a contractual flattering title of any qualified person (property of the district), and so the “taxpayer” dies (is executed) with the person, for no more obligations exist to pay tax upon being registered property of Caesar (the district). With the death of the man comes the end of his or her pledged and contracted surety to act and be responsible for the debts and obligations of the legal person (property of the district). To be clear, all citizen-ships (commercial vessels) are persons (legal statuses/property) of the United States, which is a district (where all persons, places, and things [legally registered names] are held in seizure, distress, distraint) — another word for the realm and rendition of Caesar. Thus to be born again so-to-speak back into Nature (Gods Realm and Law) the user (agent/actor) must render back to Caesar (the district) what is Caesar’s property (status) as the scripture (Natural Law) states.

–=–

“Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in Truth. Is it lawful to give tribute (tax) to Cesar, or not?”

“…And Jesus answering said to them, Render to Cesar the things that are Cesar’s(give back the legal person, relinquish flattering titles and privileges), and to God the things that are God’s.And they marveled at him.”

—Mark 12: 14 and 17, KJV

–=–

And here again we see that Reality, God, Nature and Its Law have no respect for persons, or of course for any legal fiction whatsoever. This is the very foundation of the Bible’s teachings, as the avoidance of all things legal, artificial, fictional, etc. To render or return the property (persona) of the state (Caesar) is to quit claiming to be anything but an Act of God.

No wonder we are conditioned from birth to hate the Bible, to keep it away from public (legal) learning institutions, and to follow the doctrines of false (legalized) religions and governments rather than the Bible!

Rendition is another word for performance, and the legal term execution (death) is of course the end of a contract requiring some performance and abeyance to law — not the death of an actual man, but of the man’s voluntary persona. Citizenship is a performance debt (contract). This legal death (execution of bond and surety to person) back into a spiritual Life and Law can happen at any time, not just at the recorded death certificate indication of the “Natural death” of the actual man. We seek the death of any and all legal existence (artificial life) of the person, not the man. We must render back the registered property of Caesar (the state/district) that is its person (status) and flattering titles so as to stop being its user and registered agents in surety, so that we may be free of the state (district) and its positive (anti-God) law, and so that we may act upon our moral standards restricted by legal law. In other words, we stop being performance actors (citizenships) in the legal matrix of fiction and become again men of God under the Law of God’s Nature.

And so we must understand the metaphor of nailing our selfish ways (the flesh) to the cross (i.e. hang or post public notice). A cross (stauros) is a post, or pike. Thus, we nail paper to a post.

—=—

“It is impossible to enslave, mentally or socially, a bible-reading people. The PRINCIPLES of the bible are the groundwork of human freedom.”

“And you, being DEAD in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh,He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having wiped out the HANDWRITING OF REQUIREMENTS that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, HAVING NAILED IT TO THE CROSS.”

—Colossians 2: 13-14, NKJV

—=—

“And they that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.”

—Galatians 5:24, KJB

—=—

“Those who belong to Christ Jesus have NAILED the passions and desires of their sinful nature to his cross and crucified them there.”

—Galatians 5:24, NLT (New Living Translation)

–=–

Remember, this is not religion. It is the story of Law. Every aspect of this is the Source Law, the Law of retaining one’s Source of Existence and priceless place in Nature, and nothing else. Public notice is as old as the law itself, and so is the hanging (nailing) of public notices in the public square to a post (pike).

The word cross as used here, translated and taken from the same word (stauros) translatesfiguratively as exposure to spiritual death, another term for self-denial, the denial of True Self.

The figurative meaning of the word crucify, from Strong’s G4717 (stauroō) is to crucify the flesh,and to figuratively extinguish (subdue) passion or selfishness.

And finally, this metaphor that Jesus Christ “is come in the flesh” causes the literalist to close down immediately towards any spiritual knowledge that might be garnered by the metaphor. The “flesh,” or Strong’s G4561 – sarx, (σάρξ), is defined as carnalor simplycarnal minded. The term ‘to follow after the flesh’is used of those who are on the search for persons with whom they may gratify their lust.”

A person is he that does not act as his True Self, as one not self-responsible and not acting under the Highest Law, which requires proper choice at all times. Legalism is the opposite of choice, being based purely on causality. Thus legalism is called as spiritual (without choice) death.

And so we are to nail the flesh to the cross and instead follow the Law (Son) of God. It’s just a metaphor, and obviously a damn powerful one, meaning we must become (be re-born into) our True Selves again.

To love thy True Self as thy neighbor is the law. Self Love is, of course, part of the Natural Law, for one cannot love thy neighbor as thy True Self (without legal name and title) unless first one loves thy True Self. Instead, in the artifice of the legal realm, we take the name of and act as legal persons (fictions) under false legal gods in denial of the True Self and Its Nature. In other words, person-hood is denial of one’s own highest self-existence in Nature, which happens to also be very the definition of Jehovah (YHWH), as all that is self-Existent and self-evident. God (Jehovah) is nothing more and nothing less than all that is Truth (Reality) — as a monotheistic conception of the God of Reality (Nature/Source) and Sovereign of the Universe.

But legal truth is not Real, and neither is the truths debated by the “truth movement.” Truth in Its Self is not debatable. It has no alternatives or versions. And if it does, it must therefore be a creation of man, not God, being not self-evident, and therefore must be believed in (loved) as a lie confirmed and ratified as a false but accepted legal truth. It must be therefore enforced and given standing under legal law for it to be accepted as false (confirmed and ratified) truth. A perfect example of this, of course, is the legalized (forced) truth of the value of money, an oxymoron if ever there was one.

Money comes from nothing, and only nothing can come from nothing. To debate over the false propped up corporate valuation of money (mammon) is like debating over the location of a drop of water in the ever-morphing ocean.

–=–

“Nothing can come of nothing: speak again.”

–Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’ (I, i, 92)

–=–

“Out of nothing can come, and nothing can become nothing.”

—Aulus Persius Flaccus on creativity

–=–

“From nothing, nothing comes.”

–Latin Maxim: ex nihilo nihil fit.

–=–

It is important to note here that if government calls what happens in Nature without man’s control as an “act of God” in insurance policies, then you better damn well believe that government believes in a Higher Power. Only a fool would be a subject to a false god that acknowledges a Real God of Nature, when the Highest Natural Law of that Real God of Nature admitted to by government states take no false gods! Like it or not, if you are a citizenship of the United States, you are by default a believer in God (Jehovah), and you are also an admitted adulterer against God by following the doctrines (laws) of the state (false god). Apply your reason and logic and you will find this to be Truth, not because it is religion, but because it is the foundation of the Law of both realms. I cannot stress how important this realization is.

ATTAINT – verb transitive – [See Attainder.] 1. To taint or corrupt; to extinguish the pure or inheritable blood of a person found guilty of treason or felony, by confession, battle, or verdict, and consequent sentence of death, or by special act of Parliament… 3. To disgrace; to cloud with infamy; to stain. 4. To taint or corrupt. – noun – 1. A stain, spot or taint. [See taint.] 2. Any thing injurious; that which impairs…(Webster’s 1828)

TAINT – A conviction of felony, or the person so convicted. (Black’s 4rth)

ATTAINDER – English criminal law. Attinctura, the stain or corruption of blood which arises from being condemned for any crime… (Bouvier’s 1856)

STRAW – …3.Any thing proverbially worthless. I care not a straw for the play. I will not abate a straw. (–Webster’s 1828)

STRAW MAN – 1. A fictitious person, especially one that is weak or flawed. 2. A tenuous and exaggerated counterargument that an advocate puts forward for the sole purpose of disproving it. — Also termed straw-man argument. 3. A third party used in some transactions as a temporary transferee to allow the principal parties to accomplish something that is otherwise impermissible. 4. A person hired to post a worthless bail bond for the release of an accused. — Also termed stramineus homo. (Black’s 7th)

STEAMINESS HOMO – Latin. A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety. (—Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition.)

–=–

The problem is that most people think of citizenship as an honor instead of a condemnation; a charge of felony in attainder. In such a large, open-air prison, it is sometimes hard to remember we are all convict fellons by birth, abandoned to the state. The word condemnation is defined as “the process by which property of a private owner is taken for public use” in Black’s 4th Edition, with the word condemned meaning “worthless.” This describes the birth certification or “delivery” (abandonment) process, and is ho w we become public persons from that false legal birth event and registration. It is the persona (legal mask/status), not the actual man that is feloniously created. For government is only god over its own creation, which is the person and never the man. The man volunteers to become surety for that status in adulthood (legalized adultery against God’s Law), and thus has standing through it, being bound for both its monetary and performance debts. By this voluntary action and false existence in bond and surety, one is considered to be in attainder, for persons (fictions) have no blood to be considered.

As fictional, legal (anti-Nature) persons (citizens/subjects) of a false god (the legal state/national district), all men suffer by their suretyship in this legally pretended attainder, or pretended corruption of blood — when one receives a legal status (person) of citizenship (subjection) to the district of New Columbia (the seat of the United States) through birth certification (nativity). To have standing in blood corruption by law is to destroy the lawful line in heirship of one’s progeny, of one’s children and of one’s parents, for citizenship is a choice to call the fictional state as god (father), though obviously no blood relations actually exists. A user and surety for another’s property is never an heir to that property or land. What exists only legally is always dead, which can be stated as to be made of straw (without value or consideration).

In other words, a right can only be introduced to that which is a creation of man’s law. Persons. Strawmen.

Remember, the son is named by the first (christian) name of Nature, but the heir at law comes from the last or surname of legal genealogical history.

SURNAME – The family name; the name over and above the Christian name.The part of a name which isnot given in baptism; the last name; the name of a person which is derived from the common name of his parents; the name common to all members of a family. A patronymic. (–Black’s 4rth)

PATRONYMIC – noun – 1.A name derived from the name of a father or ancestor, typically by the addition of a prefix or suffix, e.g., Johnson, O’Brien, Ivanovich.– adjective – 1. Denoting or relating to a name derived from the name of a father or male ancestor.“the patronymic naming of children.”(–Oxford Dictionary online)

–=–

Citizenship, or rather the act of birth registration (taxation) to Caesar’s district, the nation, where the state becomes father of the person we act as surety to (creator of person/status in society), is the act of one relinquishing the blood-rights of himself and his heirs. The boy or girl is still a son in Nature (outside of the legal realm), but in the legal realm of Caesar’s jurisdiction the legal persona (strawman) attached to the child in bond and surety at adulthood (legalized, state-licensed adultery) is no longer an heir by law.

ADULTERY – noun – [Latin adulterium. See Adulterate.] 1. Violation of the marriage bed; a crime, or a civil injury, which introduces, or may introduce, into a family, a spurious offspring… In common usage, adultery means the unfaithfulness of any married person to the marriage bed… 2. In a scriptural sense,all manner of lewdness or unchastity, as in the seventh commandment. 3.In scripture, idolatry, or apostasy from the true God. Jeremiah 3:8. 4. In old laws, the fine and penalty imposed for the offense of adultery. 5. In ecclesiastical affairs, the intrusion of a person into a bishopric, during the life of the bishop. 6. Among ancient naturalists, the grafting of trees was called adultery being considered as an unnatural union. (Webs1828)

ADULTERATE – verb transitive – [Latin adultero, from adulter, mixed, or an adulterer; ad and alter, other.] To corrupt, debase, or make impure by an admixture of baser materials; as, to adulterate liquors, or the coin of a country. – verb intransitive – To commit adultery. – adjective – Tainted with adultery; debased by foreign mixture.(Webs1828)

–=–

The etymology of the word adultery comes from the Old French avoutrie, aoulterie, a noun of condition from avoutre/aoutre, and from the Latin adulterare “to corrupt,” meaning, “debauch; falsify, debase.” The term adulterate is used correctly when describing a lie or a corruption of something that was pure. Broadly speaking, an act of Adultery is an act that makes purity into impurity. (–etymonline.com)

The action of attaching and thus registering (taxing) the legal state surname (last name) to the first or pure and God-given “christian” first name is an act of legalized adultery (adult-hood), and is the only way that any man may be so taxed (registered) to Caesar’s district and realm, being re-rendered as a person, no longer recognized as a man (Creation of God). A person is a creation of the state. This admixing of names is called as a blemish or mark upon the soul and True Nature of man in the Bible. It is a corruption of the connection man has to Source, for it carries the anti-Source (fictional) law, the law of persons.

Indeed, all ancient religions in their base foundation concur on this point. Only man’s recreation of false doctrines in incorporation obfuscates the True intent of most religions and the meanings of their words. Self-evident, self-existent Truth is of course universal, requiring no man for its self-evident, self-existent Truth and Nature.

“Have nought to do with adultery;
for it is a foul thing and an evil way.”

—Mohammed, from the Qu’ran, Sura XVII, The Night Journey, Mecca

—=—

While in modern legal cases and in our dumbed down society, the word adultery is of course used for sexual relations simply because sex sells and occupies the mind. But the root of the word is the admixture of anything to cause the pureness of another to vanish or to become unseen. This is the nature of national citizenship, a figurative (artificial) corruption of blood.

Fortunately, the actions of this arrogant commenter and believer of these deceivers did not somehow magically erase every legal dictionary and history of the word straw man and man of straw in all languages. Nope, it was just troll-poop scatted carelessly by one unwilling to verify facts.

It is one of the small pleasures in life to be able to now completely demolish these types of misinformation pieces printed by the organized criminal revenue collection agency of government. In older days, these farmers of revenue (fishers of men) were agents of the king/treasury, and were known by the title of “escheats,” or “cheaters.” They were the henchmen for the head pirates of the pirate cove. Of course the escheat laws are alive and well in the United States, a modern feudal system lost to the changing language arts.

I wish to walk the reader through this hilariously deceiving bulletin and pick apart the glaringly obvious trickery in its wording, which to anyone without familiarity of legal law, would cause fear and loathing of what some call legally as the “straw man.”

My comments from herein will be in blue below after each false and misleading statement by both the “truth” movement and by the Internal Revenue Agency.

Let’s begin…

–=–

Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2005-14

Frivolous tax returns; use of “straw man” to avoid tax. This ruling emphasizes to taxpayers and to promoters and return preparers that a taxpayer cannot avoid income tax on the erroneous theory that the government has created a separate and distinct entity or “straw man,” in place of the taxpayer and that the taxpayer is not responsible for the tax obligations of the “straw man.” This argument has no merit and is frivolous.

–=–

Silly rabbit, tricks are for attorneys and scribes! The “taxpayer” is a title assigned to the already created strawman (property)! A “taxpayer” is the personification of the fallacious strawman argument. Only persons (strawmen) are “taxpayers” as so defined.

To be clear, the above statement is accurate as a fallacious statement. However, it has no foundation in law. Remember, the taxpayer is a flattering title attached to the strawman (person), not in place of it. A taxpayer has no standing without being attached to a legal person (status).

This Latin term that has been translated into the English (dog-Latin) “strawman” stems from the term stramineus homo, to which Black’s Law 4th Edition defines as “a man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety.” To be clear, this refers to the bond of surety that each man stands in when operating in a commercial persona (public citizenship status) of the corporate United States. To be of no substance is to be formal, a fictional personification of the Real; a simulation (representation). All aspects of legal identity, including all names, numbers, marks, signs, signatures, flattering titles, marriages, contracts, and licenses are all connected to this “straw man.” It is merely a word for a legal person, with the understanding that anything designated as “legal” is artificial, or “art” for short. Of course, a man built of straw is the simulation (personification) of an Real man. What is not of nature is of the artifice (i.e. man-made). Thus, the colloquialism that a fictional persona is made of straw actually makes a whole lot of sense at the figurative level, like the scarecrow (man of straw) searching for a brain from the evil Wizard of Oz. And it is very important to understand that all things of government origin are made of straw. Fiction is not reality. The legal language is almost exclusively a figurative language defining fictional persons, places, and things (nouns), the word noun meaning merely name. The words or terms of art of government are property of government. Thus, so is the name of every national citizenship, registered at birth and used by each man (agent) in public, commercial franchise. And so it is true, one would certainly not use the strawman as an excuse to not pay the taxes of the taxpayer, because they are one in the same. Taxpayer is a title, and titles can only be granted or forced upon government property, which is the legal person (strawman). To separate the two as different legal entities is disingenuous at best, outright trickery at the worst in regards to this first paragraph.

With this knowledge of the true intent and meaning of the term straw man, a quite legitimate term of art dating to the Roman law, let us examine the IRS’s first statement above. Notice that this government “agency” is trying to distinguish a difference between what a “taxpayer” is and what a “straw man” is. Funny that the IRS doesn’t define the word “taxpayer” so that we can be certain that a “taxpayer” is not indeed merely another fictional form without substance, a flattering title assigned to the strawman.

And so we must ask, where in Nature, where in Reality can we find a “taxpayer?” Is any man, animal, insect, or plant born a taxpayer? Was I a “taxpayer” when I fell out of my mother’s womb? Is a “taxpayer” a Creation of God, or a creation of government? Is the title of “taxpayer” a legal status or does it course through my veins as some inescapable genetic dis-ease? Just where, oh where do “taxpayers” come from?

Anyone in their right mind knows the answer to these questions. Even the most patriotic of subjects to the sovereign tyranny and piracy of these United States cheaters can’t possibly think that being a “taxpayer” is somehow Natural or has anything to do with the True Nature of Life. After all, there is no money in Reality, in Nature, so how can there be a tax on money in Nature? Ironically, if money grew on trees, it would be all but worthless. But let us consult the foundational maxims (principles ) of law for verification:

MAXIM: An act of God does wrong to no one.

MAXIM: The act of God does no injury; that is, no one is responsible for inevitable accidents.

MAXIM: No one is held to answer for the effects of a superior force, or of an accident, unless his own fault has contributed.

MAXIM: All men know God. [Hebrews 8:11]

MAXIM: That is the highest law which favors religion.

MAXIM: God, and not man, make the heir. [Romans 8:16]

MAXIM: The law which governs corporations is the same as that which governs individuals.

A citizen-ship (commercial vessel) of the United States is called an individual person, whereas a corporation is called an artificial person. Both are, according to the maxims of law, governed by the same law. For a person is never of God (Nature), and so cannot be protected by the Law of Nature’s God. An Act of God is under God’s Natural Law, while all legally created persons and titles are under man’s legally created law. And this is why, while all men are said to be created equal under God, all persons are certainly not created equal. In fact, the whole purpose of persons is artifical inequality — the destruction of God’s Law of Creation, or Law of Nature. This was simply word trickery by the “founding fathers” of the United States, to fool the illiterate masses into believing that the fathers (gods) and their bloodlines (Posterity) were equal in status (persona) to themselves, the creators of the legal realm and artifice.

And so we can see here, at the beginning, that this disinformation piece is designed to separate these two terms into separate or unattached legal entities, dismissing outright the “straw man argument” as it calls it. And indeed, anyone foolish enough to use such an argument would lose, for these are not separate things. A taxpayer is a part of the straw man (person/citizenship), and cannot exist without it. Corporations are “taxpayers” too, for corporations are persons too! “Taxpayer” is merely a fictional title without substance placed upon any man acting in surety and agency to a United States proprietary persona (citizen-ship/legal status) that agrees to contract and conduct commerce therein.

Let us look at the source, the US Code for our definitions:

26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions

(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof—

(1) Person – The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation…

(14) Taxpayer – The term “taxpayer” means any personsubject to any internal revenue tax.

And of course we have court record to guide us as to the interpretational definitions of that master-class of devilmasters in their devilry:

“The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessment and collection.They relate to taxpayers, and not to nontaxpayers. The latter are without their scope.No procedure is prescribed for nontaxpayers, and no attempt is made to annul any of their rights and remedies in due course of law.With them Congress does not assume to deal, and they are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws…“

[Long v. Rasmussen, 281 F. 236 (1922)]

–=–

You see, we forget that there is also a legal entity called as a “nontaxpayer.”

“A reasonable construction of the taxing statutes does not include vesting any tax official with absolute power of assessment against individuals not specified in the statutes as a person liable for the tax without an opportunity for judicial review of this status before the appellation of ‘taxpayer’ is bestowed upon them and their property is seized…”

[Botta v. Scanlon, 288 F.2d. 504, 508 (1961)]

–=–

So the status of taxpayer must be bestowed upon a person (strawman) before that person is a taxpayer, or he is by default considered as a nontaxpayer. So taxpayer is a legal status, not a natural disease.

But how does this fact relate to the person, the strawman?

–=–

“This word ‘person’ and its scope and bearing in the law, involving, as it does,legal fictions and also apparently [IN APPEARANCE ONLY] natural beings, it is difficult to understand; but it is absolutely necessary to grasp, at whatever cost, a true and proper understanding to the word in all the phases of its proper use.A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the STATUS or CONDITION with which he is invested. Not an individual or physical person, but the STATUS, CONDITION or CHARACTER borne (carried) by physical persons.”

“The law of persons is the law ofSTATUS or CONDITION.”

—American Law and Procedure, Vol. 13, page 137, 1910

–=–

And so how is a “taxpayer” then defined both statutorily and as deliberated by the courts?

–=–

“And by statutory definition, ‘taxpayer‘ includes anyperson, trust or estate subject to a tax imposed by the revenue act. …Since the statutory definition of ‘taxpayer’ is exclusive,the federal courts do not have the power to create nonstatutory taxpayers for the purpose of applying the provisions of the Revenue Acts…”

–C.I.R. v. Trustees of L. Inv. Ass’n, 100 F.2d. 18 (1939)

–=–

Specifically, Rowen seeks a declaratory judgment against the United States of America with respect to “whether or not the plaintiff is a taxpayer pursuant to, and/or under 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(14).” (See Compl. at 2.) This Court lacks jurisdiction to issue a declaratory judgment “with respect to Federal taxes other than actions brought under section 7428 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,” a code section that is not at issue in the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2201; see also Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d 531, 536-537 (9th Cir. 1991) (affirming dismissal of claim for declaratory relief under §2201 where claim concerned question of tax liability).Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, and the instant action is hereby DISMISSED.

–Rowen v. U.S., 05-3766MMC. (N.D.Cal. 11/02/2005)

–=–

In other words, a “taxpayer” is a legal person that artificially exists (appears) only in a certain fictional, legal jurisdiction, and only when certain conditions exist. Remember, to be taxed is to be registered as a person of the state/district (Caesar). This is not a man, for no man is bound to any jurisdiction, only the persons of men may legally appear. Men Live in blood and Spirit, they don’t appear. To show up in court, the person (legal admixed name) must be found to be in that court, and jurisdiction over that legal persona must be proven, lest the case be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (see above). The question above is not whether a taxpayer exists, but whether that title can be attached to the person (strawman) of the defendant in surety to it.

–=–

“And by statutory definition the term “taxpayer” includes anyperson, trust or estatesubject to a tax imposed by the revenue act. …Since the statutory definition of taxpayer is exclusive, the federal [and state] courts do not have the power to create nonstatutory taxpayers for the purpose of applying the provisions of the Revenue Acts…”

–C.I.R. v. Trustees of L. Inv. Ass’n, 100 F.2d.18 (1939)

–=–

It is clear that a “taxpayer” is thus a creation of the state, not of Nature. A taxpayer is any person (legal status) subject to tax. Thus it is clear that a taxpayer is no man, but can indeed only be a straw man (fictional entity/persona) that some man is in surety to.

–=–

“He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it: and he that hateth suretiship is sure.“

–Proverbs 11:15, KJB

–=–

“A man void of understanding striketh hands, and becometh surety in the presence of his friend.”

–Proverbs 17:18, KJB

–=–

“I will be surety for him; of my hand shalt thou require him: if I bring him not unto thee, and set him before thee, then let me bear the blame for ever…“

–Genesis 43:9, KJB

–=–

To be considered as a “taxpayer” is to be in surety first for a legal persona (status), and then also for the flattering legal title of taxpayer. The taxpayer is required to pay tax, and the man in surety will surely follow, for the surety insures payment of the persona and title he uses.

When a trust or estate can be given the title of “taxpayer” then we know that a taxpayer is not a Real man. A person is also not a man, but the legal status of a man bound in surety to another. It’s just a word. Form without substance. This must be understood here so that we may certainly state that a “taxpayer” is indeed merely a fictionally created straw man of (belonging to) government.

Go through the following definitions very slowly and meticulously, connecting all the dots:

BONDSMAN –One who by a SEALED INSTRUMENT engagesthat: if another person (the principal) fails to do a specified thing he will pay a certain sum of money;a surety. (–W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

BONDSMAN – noun – [bond and man.]A SLAVE.1.A SURETY;one who is BOUND, or who gives security, for another. (–Webster’s 1828)

SECURITY – (1)An instrument which guarantees the certainty of some specific thing, as, payment or PERFORMANCE.(2) A SURETY.Written after the name of one who signs a promissory note, means ” surety.” See Surety. (3) Individualsafety. See Personal Security… evidences of indebtedness. (–W.C. Anderson’s Dictionary of Law, 1889)

SURETY – Contracts.A person who binds himself for the payment of a sum of money or for the performance of something else, for another, who is already bound for the same. A surety differs from a guarantor, and the latter (guarantor) cannot be sued until after a suit against the principal. 2. The surety differs from bail in this, that the latter (bail) actually has, or is by law presumed to have, the custody of his principal, while the former(surety) has no control over him.The bail may surrender his principal in discharge of his obligation;the surety cannot be discharged by such surrender. 3. In Pennsylvania it has been decided that the creditor is bound to sue the principal when requested by the surety, and the debt is due; and that when proper notice is given by the surety that unless the principal be sued, he will consider himself discharged, he will be so considered, unless the principal be sued. But in generala creditor may resort to the surety for the payment of his debt in the first place, without applying to the principal. (See) Contribution; Contracts; Suretyship. (–Bouvier’s 1856)

SURETYSHIP – The contract of suretyship is that whereby one obligates himself to pay the debt of another in consideration of creditor indulgence, or other benefit given to his principal, the principal remaining bound therefor. It differs from a guaranty is this: that the consideration of the latter is a benefit flowing to the guarantor. Suretyship is an accessory promise by which a person binds himself for another already bound, and agrees with the creditor to satisfy the obligation, if the debtor does not. A contract of suretyship is a contract whereby one person engages to be answerable for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another. For the distinctions between “suretyship” and “guaranty,” see GUARANTY. (–Black’s Law 1st)

STRAWMAN – 1. Draft or outline copy ready for suggestions and comments. 2. Third party used as a cover in illegal or shady deals. 3. Nominee director. 4. A weak or flawedperson with no standing. Also called man of straw. (–Black’s Law 2nd)

STRAWMAN – 1. A weak orimaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted. 2.A person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction. (–Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary)

DUMMY – noun – One who holds legal title for another;a straw man.(–Black’s Law 4th Edition)

DUMMY – adjective –Sham; make-believe; pretended; imitation. As respects basis for predicating liability on parent corporation for acts of subsidiary, “agency,” “adjunct,” “branch,” “instrumentality,” “dummy,” “buffer,” and “tool” all mean very much the same thing. (–Black’s Law 4th Edition)

AGENCY – A relation, created either byexpress or implied contract or by law,whereby one party (called theprincipal or constituent) delegates the transaction of some lawful business or the authorityto do certain acts for him or in relation to his rights or property,with more or less discretionary power,to another person(called theagent, attorney, proxy, or delegate)who undertakes to manage the affair and render him an account thereof. The contract of agency may be defined to be a contract by which one of the contracting parties confides the management of some affair, to be transacted on his account, to the other party,who undertakes to do the business and render an account of it.A contract bywhich one person,with greater or less discretionary power,undertakes to represent another in certain business relations.A relation between two or more persons, by which one party, usually called the agent or attorney, is authorized to do certain acts for, or in relation to (lie rights or property) of the other, who is denominated the principal, constituent, or employer. (–Black’s Law 2nd Edition)

–=–

In case you missed that, a surety is the same as a slave, as involuntary subjection; a performance debtor in an open-air prison (district).

Obviously, this opening statement by the IRS was one of obfuscation and very well-known inaccuracy, not in reference to law but to a vast range of misconceptions brought forth by the mythology of the generally misinformed patriot/truth/liberty/sovereignty movements. In other words, the IRS is not refuting the fact or legal existence of the “straw man,” for without it there would be no entity to charge any tax to. Instead, the IRS has address the strawman argument created by fallacious defendants against the IRS and has chosen merely to address that existential, external strawman argument, without explaining the actual facts about what the word strawman stands in reference to in law, as the actual persona that the title of “Taxpayer” is attached to. One (the taxpayer) cannot exist and have standing without the other (the person) being precedent.

Continuing with the IRS document…

–=–

PURPOSE

The Service is aware that some taxpayers are attempting to reduce their federal tax liability by taking the incorrect position that their incomes are not subject to tax based on a theory that the government has created a separate and distinct entity, or “straw man,” in place of the taxpayer and that the taxpayer is not responsible for the tax obligations of the “straw man.” Some promoters market a package, kit, or other materials that claim to show taxpayers how they can avoid paying income taxes based on these and other meritless arguments.

This revenue ruling emphasizes to taxpayers and to promoters and return preparers that a taxpayer cannot avoid income tax on the erroneous theory that the government has created a “straw man.” This argument has no merit and is frivolous.

The Service is committed to IDENTIFYING taxpayers who attempt to avoid their tax obligations by taking frivolous positions, including frivolous positions based on meritless “straw man” or similar arguments. The Service will take vigorous enforcement action against these taxpayers and against promoters and return preparers who assist taxpayers in taking these frivolous positions. Frivolous returns and other similar documents submitted to the Service are processed through its Frivolous Return Program. As part of this program, the Service confirms whether taxpayers who take frivolous positions have filed all of their required tax returns, computes the correct amount of tax and interest due, and determines whether civil and criminal penalties should apply. The Service also determines whether civil or criminal penalties should apply to return preparers, promoters, and others who assist taxpayers in taking frivolous positions, and recommends whether a court injunction should be sought to halt these activities. Other information about frivolous tax positions is available on the Service website at IRS (website).

This, again, is a truth told based on the logical fallacy of the foolish theroist, but not because the Truth is told to counteract or correct the “truther” that submitted the theory — that the taxpayer is not responsible for the tax obligations of the strawman. Inversely though, it is correct to say that the strawman is responsible for the tax obligations of the taxpayer. This simple reversal of terms is again a way for the IRS to trick us into confusion based on the fallacious, ill-conceived “theories” of the patriot/truth movement and its false gurus. The surety is responsible for the strawman, and the strawman is responsible for the taxpayer, in that order. Again, no effort to educate or correct these fallacies is present herein, for if we were made to understand the way this all works, no one in their right (informed) mind would fall for the trap of being a taxpayer. The IRS would have to close its doors, with no persons dumb enough left to place its false, flattering legal titles upon. Thus it would have no precedent to tax (extort) from any person.

Note that each year, around 50% of all US citizens do not pay federal income taxes. By this accounting, 50% of us should be in jail, since most people believe that all persons are taxpayer by default! Unless that is, that most of that 50% just don’t qualify under the flattering title of “taxpayers.”

Notice that only the word “taxpayer” is used above, as what is against the taxpayer or as the process of “identifying taxpayers.” This is because a “taxpayer” is a specific title created by the IRS under US CODE, and of course it makes the rules over what its own creation (property) must do. At no time does it mention any man or person that is not a taxpayer, because it only has jurisdiction over fools who allow themselves to become and be flatteringly titled as “taxpayers.” In other words, an identified, titled “taxpayer” cannot avoid taxes, because this is the purpose and law of over a title of “taxpayer.” But first the “taxpayer” must be identified, which obviously means that while all taxpayers are persons, not all persons are taxpayers. No man in their right mind would first identify himself as a person that is a “taxpayer” and then argue that he is not a “taxpayer.” This is where gurus and false teachers come into play, steering the truth and patriot movement wrong for many decades with what the courts label as “paper terrorism” and fallacious theories at outrageous prices.

Again we can see above that the IRS is merely arguing against what it knows is a fallacious theory, a strawman argument that is easily disputed, but not offering any corrective facts to prove that argument, of which these gurus have convinced their marks that the taxpayer and the strawman are not the same thing, when in fact the straw man is the “taxpayer” (person liable to tax) when so qualified as such, not the man. For while all persons are men, not all men are attached to persons.

Continuing with the IRS document…

–=–

ISSUE

Whether the government’s use of different forms of a taxpayer’s name (e.g., different capitalization formats, spellings) creates a “straw man,” which is a separate and distinct legal entity from the taxpayer to allow the taxpayer to avoid federal tax obligations?

Here we see again the obfuscating idea being put forward that the “taxpayer” is separate from the straw man (person) or citizenship status again. But this is not any argument I’ve made, and certainly the above definitions show that the “taxpayer” is “any person subject to any internal revenue tax.” And so yes, if this is the claim being made, then certainly one would loose this case, having only partial knowledge and understanding of the legal law and tax code regarding personhood (citizenship) in the subjection of bond and surety. In other words, this whitewashing document is designed for the very idiot that posted it to my website, so that he may cease in doing any due diligence or further research to defeat this strawman argument and feel more comfortable with his own voluntary servitude in persona and “taxpayer” status. In other words, this IRS document is a lie designed to appear as truth to the truth movement, and is put forward as official “truth” therein. Unfortunately, this type of false positive truth are what the truth movement is founded upon — the truth of lies.

To be clear, there is no requirement or set way to write names or other titles. Style manuals are not law, merely suggestions and standards. More to the point, if one writes one’s name without ALL-CAPS or even misspells their own name, as soon as that man (agent in surety to the name) answers in legal appearance for that name, the error is considered remedied and corrected. For the intent of the agent is clear as soon as he appears in that name. This ALL-CAPS argument is perhaps the most worthless of the many patriot mythologies surrounding the strawman system.

Continuing…

–=–

DISCUSSION OF THE “STRAW MAN” CLAIM

The “straw man” claim is premised on the erroneous theory that most government documents do not actually refer to individuals.

Note: Remember that a person (status) is defined as “an individual.” All citizenships are individuals (persons) as opposed to corporations (artificial persons) made up of many individuals. Only a fool would claim that a strawman is not the same as a person (individual). Again, this is just obfuscating language designed to throw us off the scent. No claim I have made states that I believe a straw man is not an individual person, nor that the “taxpayer” is not defined as an individual liable for tax under this IRS Code. That would be downright stupid — which unfortunately is the basis of the realm of false guru-based nonsense and advertising in the truth movement and radio circuit.

Continuing…

–=–

Users of the “straw man” theory falsely claim that only documents using an individual’s name with “standard” capitalization, i.e., lower-case with only the beginning letters of each name capitalized, are legitimate.These individuals erroneously argue that the use of the individual’s name in all upper-case letters, which is common in some government documents, refers to a separate legal entity, called a “straw man.”

To be clear, government can only communicate with persons, with straw men. In other words, every letter that comes to a citizenship of the United States from government is addressed to the person (sttrawman), which was sent to the man acting in agency and surety for that person at the registered federal mailing address on file. Again, government cannot commune with the Living, only the dead. As registered agent for service of process, your home address is also your interstate commercial address.

To even mention this notion that nothing but capital letters are being used or that the so-called “ALL-CAPS” name has anything to do with whether the straw man exists legally (artificially) is again purposefully misleading and fallacious. And the error is again not corrected by legal facts, as I have provided here. Style manuals again are not law, any more than proper manners and morals are law, and no law states that any name must be capitalized or even spelled correctly for legal identity of the person (strawman) as a “taxpayer” to be established. Those who are again foolish enough to use this argument have been tricked by false gurus that parrot other false gurus and shock-jock radio hosts. This argument by the IRS does not apply to myself nor to anyone else that understands what a straw man is. Again, this is just misleading rhetoric designed to confuse the subject and cause tax (commerce) to flow. ALL-CAPS are used for ease of reference to determine corporations from individuals and fictions from Reality, etc. But both are persons (strawmen) as we have defined and as defined by the courts, and so the point is mute. There is no law that applies here, only stylization suggestions for organization and ease of use, the same as any other corporation out there has.

Moving on…

–=–

These individuals also erroneously argue that, as a result of the creation of a “straw man,” they are not liable for the debts, including the tax debts, of their “straw man,” that taxing the “straw man” is illegal because the “straw man” is a debt instrument based upon the labor of a real person and is, therefore, a form of slavery, or that no tax is owed by the real individual because it can be satisfied, or offset, by money in a “Treasury Direct Account” held in the name of the “straw man.”

Firstly, an individual is a person (strawman), so this argument is again mute. Of course the tax is charged not to the strawman, but to the “taxpayer,” which again is a title put upon the strawman (person). Obviously an agent in surety to the person (strawman) that is identified as a “taxpayer” is liable to pay the tax. You cannot argue the tax, only whether the title of “taxpayer” applies to the person (strawman). The precedent must exist to lay the tax. Once the title is linked, one cannot claim one’s person (status) to not be a “nontaxpayer.” We again see the IRS trying its best to keep the separation going, as if the strawman doesn’t exist in the first place. Yet it says here that “these individuals” are doing the arguing, which means that they are already considered to be persons (strawmen) doing the arguing in surety (strawman form). And so the IRS is claiming that the “strawman” and thus the surety for that person is not liable for the debts of the “taxpayer.” That’s ridiculous, unless that strawman (person) can show the IRS to be of its other created title/status, which used to be called a “non taxpayer.” Remember, the person (strawman) is property of government. We have no choice in the matter.

We read above that surety is a synonym for slavery, and we see above that the IRS does not dismiss this statement, but only uses it to further the ridiculousness of the argument. A bit of truth mixed with lies and obfuscations is always more effective.

There is no such thing as a “Real” person, for man creates nothing Real, and nothing legal is ever Reality. The term “real person” is an oxymoron, meaning a real artifice, a real lie, or a real fiction. What is Real is of God, never of the government. This again is self-evident. But it helps promote the strawman argument well, pretending that the strawman and the title of “taxpayer” and the person are somehow separate entities. Men do labor in the name of a person. Persons do no labor, anymore than a pair of leather work gloves lays bricks without a force moving them.

As to the rest of it, this is a big one. Many people have been tricked into the permanent delusion of seeking rewards, reparations, payoffs, and non-existent pots of gold at the end of non-existent rainbows, believing that for some reason there is some magical account that they can access such as the aforementioned “Treasury Direct Account,” as if that account was specifically set up with the design to remedy by some reward the “truther” that finds it. The gurus have created their own treasure hunt built on these mystery accounts that, if only we could prove their existence, we can somehow rape them of all their money. After all, these are trust accounts for the persons we dwell in, and therefor they must be created for us to find and take, right? Does that make sense to you, considering the person (strawman/legal status) is government property and not your own, and that your actions in surety to that persona are strictly voluntary? What possible remedy does one who is a voluntary slave seek, since no wrong can come to a volunteer? A man benefiting from fraud, after all, cannot suddenly claim it to be fraud while still continuing to act in and benefit from the fraud! It seems the whole truth/patriot/freedom/liberty movement has gone from seeking True Freedom and Liberty under God to wanting money for damages instead, seeking some magic account that doesn’t exist for that purpose. They have simply forgotten or chose to ignore God and It’s Law and chosen mammon (valuation) in It’s stead.

And yes, before I realized the scam, I too was like a jackass lead by a carrot (of gold) to seek this never to be found straw man account. But eventually, one realizes that these otherwise good-intentioned people were displaced from seeking Natural Freedom and Liberty in Nature and under Its Law only to be sidetracked into seeking money in mammon under the law of persons and begin to love their state and status within this master and servant game of volunteerism. It is a shameful turn that many or most have succumbed to, some even accepting money for the stolen lands of their family posterity (bloodline inheritance). And this monetary reward bait-trap keeps us in the system instead of rejecting it outright as fraud, leaving us stuck in the legal law matrix and its commercially coded sub-structure instead of causing us to leave this obvious simulacrum of Babylon. It causes us to remain in legal persona until we find the hidden treasure that can never be found, for it is nothingness, and from nothing comes nothing. And again, just as Huxley predicted, we have been made to love our servitude simply through this endless pursuit of mammon.

As for taxing the strawman as a “taxpayer,” they are only taxing their own property (legal entity/vessel) that we choose voluntarily to use in commerce. A user and surety of another’s property will always smart for it and pay for that use. This idea of labor being a man’s property comes from the one part of the tax code that they do everything to avoid, which is Title 83.

Continued…

–=–

All individuals are subject to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 1 imposes a tax on all taxable income. Section 61 provides that gross income includes all income from whatever source derived, including compensation for services. Adjustments to income, deductions, and credits must be claimed in accordance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the accompanying Treasury regulations, and other applicable federal law. Section 6011 provides that any person liable for any tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code shall make a return when required by Treasury regulations, and that returns must be filed in accordance with Treasury regulations and IRS forms. Section 6012 identifies the persons who are required to file income tax returns.Section 6151 requires that taxpayers pay their tax when the return is due. Section 6311 requires payment of taxes by commercially acceptable means as prescribed by Treasury regulations.

There is no authority under the Internal Revenue Code or any other applicable law that supports the claim that taxpayers may avoid their federal tax obligations based on “straw man” arguments, as described in this revenue ruling, or on similar arguments. The formatting of a taxpayer’s name in all upper-case letters on government documents or elsewhere has no significance whatsoever for federal tax purposes. Courts have rejected as frivolous “straw man” arguments. United States v. Furman, 168 F.Supp.2d 609 (E.D. La. 2001) (rejecting criminal defendant’s contention that he was not properly identified in federal government documents that misspelled his name or used his properly spelled name in all capital letters). In addition, courts repeatedly have rejected similar arguments based on frivolous claims that purport to provide a basis for avoiding taxes, and have penalized taxpayers who have made these arguments. See, e.g., Lovell v. United States, 755 F.2d 517, 519 (7th Cir. 1984) (“[A]ll individuals, natural or unnatural, must pay federal income tax on their wages . . ..”); United States v. Romero, 640 F.2d 1014, 1017 (9th Cir. 1981) (“[I]n our system of government, one is free to speak out in open opposition to the provisions of the tax laws, but such opposition does not relieve a citizen of his obligation to pay taxes.”).

All of these demands and statements are very specific. The term “wages,” for instance, is a very limited term that is defined in the tax code. And yes, income tax certainly applies to “wages.” To argue otherwise is foolish. But the IRS must prove what is a “wage” and what is not, just as it must prover identity of persona before it may prove “taxpayer” status. Again, it must establish precedent.

It is also certainly true that courts will joyfully reject such claims presented at bar, for they are erroneously presented in the first place, backed nowhere by the law. A person cannot deny personhood, only a man can. And a person’s actions in and under law decides whether that person is a taxpayer, whether natural (individual) or unnatural (corporation). Remember, the creator controls. This maxim applies to persons (legal identity and status) and to the words (terms of art) in legal language used to create and govern them. You cannot change or alter the definitions of government, but you can learn them and use them properly.

Note too that the IRS refers to these fallacious notions as being a way for “avoiding” taxation. Avoidance is not illegal in any way, and is the very definition of being a “nontaxpayer.” Once what is avoidable becomes unavoidable due to one’s actions and contracts in commerce, only then is avoidance illegal. In other words, once the “taxpayer” status is attached to the strawman (person) it cannot any longer be avoided. Avoidance is what happens before these obligations are made. Thus the IRS and the courts will always deny claims made for avoidance of taxation after the intent and liability is established (confirmed by actions). The only thing one can do is to not become a “taxpayer” by not using the person (strawman) in any way that would creates such a title (status) as “taxpayer.”

To be clear, if a person (strawman) is called into court amor being a taxpayer, and the agent for service of process appear in court as that person so declared to be a “taxpayer,” then the agent has already all but lost his case. All such denials and objections to the title of “taxpayer” should have been addressed through the U.S. Mail system before any appearance is made. To appear as a taxpayer and argue that you are not a taxpayer is certainly a sign of ignorance, illiteracy of legal law, and foolishness.

Continuing…

–=–

CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES

The Service will challenge the claims of individuals who attempt to avoid or evade their federal tax liability by refusing to file returns and pay tax, and will disallow deductions or other claimed tax benefits, including the exclusion of income, based on frivolous “straw man” arguments. In addition to liability for the tax due plus statutory interest, individuals who claim tax benefits on their returns, or fail to file returns, based on these and other frivolous arguments face substantial civil and criminal penalties. Potentially applicable civil penalties include: (1) the section 6651 additions to tax for failure to file a return, failure to pay the tax owed, and fraudulent failure to file a return; (2) the section 6662 accuracy-related penalty, which is equal to 20 percent of the amount of taxes the taxpayer should have paid; (3) the section 6663 penalty for civil fraud, which is equal to 75 percent of the amount of taxes the taxpayer should have paid; (4) a $500 penalty under section 6702 for filing a frivolous return; and (5) a penalty of up to $25,000 under section 6673 if the taxpayer makes frivolous arguments in the United States Tax Court.

Taxpayers relying on these theories also may face criminal prosecution for: (1) attempting to evade or defeat tax under section 7201, for which there is a significant fine and imprisonment for up to 5 years; (2) willful failure to file a return under section 7203, for which there is a significant fine and imprisonment for up to one year; or (3) making false statements on a return, statement, or other document under section 7206, for which there is a significant fine and imprisonment for up to 3 years.

Persons,including return preparers, who promote these theories and those who assist taxpayers in claiming tax benefits based on these frivolous arguments may face penalties and also may be enjoined by courts pursuant to sections 7407 and 7408. Potential penalties include: (1) a $250 penalty under section 6694 for each return or claim for refund prepared by an income tax return preparer who knew or should have known that the taxpayer’s argument was frivolous (or $1,000 for each return or claim for refund if the return preparer’s actions were willful, intentional or reckless); (2) a penalty under section 6700 for promoting abusive tax shelters; (3) a $1,000 penalty under section 6701 for aiding and abetting the understatement of tax; and (4) criminal prosecution under section 7206, for which there is a significant fine and imprisonment for up to 3 years for assisting or advising about the preparation of a false return, statement or other document under the internal revenue laws.

HOLDING

The use of different forms of a taxpayer’s name (different spellings, capitalization, etc.) does not CREATE a “straw man” that allows taxpayers to avoid their federal tax obligations. Claims based on “straw man” arguments or on similar arguments, to avoid federal tax obligations, are frivolous and have no merit.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The author of this ruling is the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), Administrative Provisions and Judicial Practice Division. For further information regarding this ruling, contact that office at (202) 622-7950 (not a toll-free call).

–END OF DOCUMENT–

This notion that the misspelling or different spelling or ALL-CAPS spelling “CREATES” a straw man is again not corrected by the IRS, but merely left to stand as a strawman argument to be easily refuted and defeated. It is easy to call bullshit without providing facts to support the call. And in the IRS’s case, it is necessary to keep the public dumbed down as to the backbone of their criminal racket.

The strawman is created by the birth certificate as a legal entity (person/status).

The taxpayer is a title placed upon the already existent strawman (person).

Notice that all penalties listed have to do with an already identified by precedent “taxpayer” arguing against that title and status. None of this applies to persons that cannot be identified as “taxpayers.”

In the end, this whole whitewashing treatment of the subject of the straw man has been just one ridiculously and painfully obvious strawman argument, the taking of another’s logical fallacy and arguing against the known fallacy without providing facts or proves that would correct the fallacy, but instead defeating the already known-to-be-incorrect assumptions of the positions taken by fools.

–=–

–=–

–=–

I sincerely hope that this treatment of the strawman topic has clarified its methodology. Again, this is but a precursor, a summary if you will of my book “Strawman: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person”, which is free to download at (StrawmanStory.info), and where you will find the above information sourced and explained in triplicate.

Note: url not active yet. Special thanks to Jules for taking me on board the UCY.TV platform, and for all her hard work.

What’s to be found under the rose?

This show will be loosely designed around the recent release of my book, STRAWMAN, in order to learn and unlearn so many of the false truths we have been masterfully mislead with, in movements that never actually move, and with occasional guests to delight the palette.

It’s all in the name.

Tune in, because you’re already dead,
and what you don’t know is keeping you that way.

Archives to be stored at UCY.TV and Youtube, and at: CorporationNationRadioArchives.wordpress.com.

After fighting what can only be described as an extremely uphill battle, being such an inexperienced little fish in a pond of some very large and filthy corporate sharks, I am happy to announce that “STRAWMAN: The Real Story Of Your Artificial Person – Volume 1” is being printed and bound as I write this, and will officially begin shipping on Monday of next week (August 7th, 2017). I can’t possibly make any more rookie mistakes or trip over any more stumbling blocks! No more changes or corrections — of which there were a seemingly endless supply. What is written will not be undone — a scary thought — and thanks to all of your support and trust, I was able to get printed a total of 2,000 copies.

How ironic that this day falls but one day before my own strawman debtor’s birth event day (August 8th) — the day the informed upon Clint Richardson was legally berthed into this open-air debtor’s prison for so-called “natural persons.” And like every victim of this human capital management system of the district, I was at every turn tricked into voluntarily using (confirming) that false persona in agency as a legal vessel in commerce.

I am assured that Strawman will begin shipping free to all who have donated towards my efforts and requested a free copy as a gift, beginning this Monday. I hope that the receipt of this gift has been worth the wait, and I thank you all for your support and patience.

I have already sent out an email to each of you that I have confirmed for shipment on my mailing list, for those in the 50 States only. I am still working on international pricing and lists. If you did not receive an email but are expecting a printed copy to be sent to you domestically, please contact me to correct my records. Those in other countries should expect a confiramtion email shortly.

For all of the delays and seemingly purposeful obfuscations I have experienced in trying to get printed this private work in book-form without falling prey to the typical legalisms, big box print-on-demand mentality, and other corporate strangleholds, as well as doing so with the firm and unbroken insistence that it was printed without numbers, ISBN’s, barcodes, or any other “publishing” marks and government interventions and tracking devices, I could certainly tell you some amazing stories. I took the route less traveled, the hardest road, sticking with my demands of privacy and thus printing an unpublished work that is certainly not in any way registered or approved by church and state! Instead, I have chosen to learn from this series of unfortunate events some very valuable lessons, both legal and moral, to accept the things and persons I cannot change, and to be contented and happy that I finally found an honest printer.

–=–

“…I shall be telling this with a sighSomewhere ages and ages hence:Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by,And that has made all the difference.”

–Robert Frost

–=–

Though I may be telling my own story from some future prison or camp for political and religious dissenters, I am happy to say that I will be telling it with the utmost dignity. And yes, this certainly makes all the difference.

Though presently exhausted by this ongoing work and by the mental obstical course I just suffered, I will continue to work on Volume II and other works until I physically die or am made a civilly dead prisoner of the corporate church’s state. I figure that my next-next project after the Strawman series will be the history of the CAFR and how it was used to take us clandestinely into the globalism we find ourselves in today, and how combined government (an artificial persona), through investments and proxy shareholder voting, owns and controls it all! You aren’t shopping at Chevron, Costco, Apple, or Time Warner, you are always a “customer” of and shopping at government (a singular incorporation of all corporations). No corporation is created without (outside of) government. We live our commercial (fictional/dead) existence (persona) in a national company store, where all corporations are majority-share held by government investments, and where each board of directors is elected by proxy shareholder bidding by the collective, majority shareholder, which again is collectively government. And, of course, you can only spend government’s patented script, money or credit, which are both merely debt instruments — IOU’s. And so you are always using the property of another.

Not ironically, this was one of the biggest complaints of the original American colonists, that they should be taxed and forced to sped the script of the King of England, a script they could not create and had to borrow or earn from the king itself. But then, at least the colonists knew their status, that a colony is literally a company store of the crown, and that the word colony merely means the farm or plantation of a master.

These facts answer just about every question you may ever have about why corporations literally get away with murder, and why government never regulates corporations, for they are their main beneficiary and shareholding profiteer. And the highest corporate law is that the shareholders must make profit and gain on their investment. But this is another story… the story of the ultimate in conflict of interests.

I wish again here to thank everyone over the years who has donated towards my full time, unpaid activism, movie-making, radio hosting and guesting, and writing, all of which are freely shared with all who seek and always will be.

I again remind you that my new work, “Strawman: The Real Story of Your Artificial Person: Volume 1” is and always will be FREE to download in digital form (pdf) at my website, and that the printed version is not ready to be given (see website for instructions):

I am today updating the final, free version as printed, after correcting many spelling and grammatical mistakes, which will look then exactly as it is now printed. Please feel free to download and enjoy this work, both as a walkthrough of the legal matrix and as a seriously huge and utilizable resource outlet.

–=–What Now?–=–

1st of all, I think it’s time to dust off this old blog and start using it again. So… I’m back!

2nd, of course, I will continue with future volumes of Strawman and other works.

3rd, I’d say it’s about time to make another vaccine documentary. The ultimate documentary. One that cannot be outdone. One that names names and destroys false reputations. One that exposes even the “anti-vaccine” circuit as frauds in controlled opposition, who call for “safe” vaccines as if there is such a thing. But most importantly, one that shows vaccines for exactly what they are — a well laid plan, as a time-released, biological weapon.

4th, and this is where I could use a bit of help, I’d like to start a radio show again. But you see, like many of you, I don’t know where I “fit in” any more, or at least who would be brave (or dumb) enough to permit me to speak with free reign about how little truth is being spewed in the so-called truth-movement. Who wants to hear that patriotism is a psychopathy like Stockholm Syndrome while at the same time hearing advertisements within commercial airtime by so-called “patriot” corporations, as if Chinese junk and red, white, and blue stuff can ever feel patriotic? Who wants to hear that most of us are not one of “We, the People” or that these so-called “People” don’t actually even exist in Reality, that “the People” is just a corporation (artificial person) called as the States? Who wants to let me rant about The Corporation Nation we are all unwitting yet voluntary agents (employees) of?

—=—

“A state, is called the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly lieth it also; and this lie creepeth from its mouth: “I, the state, am the people.” It is a lie! Creators were they who created peoples, and hung a faith and a love over them: thus they served life. Destroyers, are they who lay snares for many, and call it the state: they hang a sword and a hundred cravings over them. Where there is still a people, there the state is not understood, but hated as the evil eye, and as sin against laws and customs.”

—Friedrich Nietzsche, from ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra’

—=—

In short, it seems there is no place out there for the self-evident Truth! You see, the Truth doesn’t sell… only mythology sells. Empty hope without end sells. Fear sells. Lies sell. Sex sells. But undeniable Truth? There is simply no market for it. And so, I’ll just simply put it out there that I am looking for a new home for my new show. I already have a title…

“RED PILL SUNDAY SCHOOL“

TAGLINE:“Buy the truth, and sell it not…”(Proverbs 32:32)

Want to hear me rant profusely and wax philosophical? Want to see the legal matrix (artificial womb) for what it is? Want to hear again from Patrick, Daniel, and other kindred spirits sharing this journey? Well then help me find an uncensored broadcasting home, if there is such an entity…

Or, maybe you fancy yourself organized, like a producer, and want to help me to organize and run a podcast? I’ll take a radio host spot from the highest bidder… which, of course, will be nothing, nada, zero, as it always is for those who will not — can not conform. Just let ’em know I am seeking a soapbox. And, of course, that I would love to do more radio, both interviews and hosting, now that this Strawman soft cover is finally finished and available.

On a final note, I wish to thank everyone that has helped me to finally get this work printed, and for trusting in me, both monetarily but especially with your time, care, and kind words. You know who you are, and you know I could not have done this project without you, from editing to spell-checking to donations to some much needed criticism.

A very special thanks to Craig Stuckless and his artistic hand, as the cover artist for this Strawman series. His brilliant work was given to the project freely, and the time and effort Craig put into this was incredible and incalculable to most. Thankfully, his professional experience with the print industry helped me in ways I cannot begin to relay or repay here.

For those who understand what it is to give your time freely as a professional, if anyone would like to help me raise some funds to offer to Craig as a gift for his many weeks of work on this art project, I’d be very appreciative. Like myself, like my now strange story, he is trying to escape the controlled corporate art world while at the same time attempting to use his professional skills for charitable and activist purposes. And that means sacrifice, both mentally and physically, socially and especially financially. Just let me know in an email or make a note that your donation should go to Craig And I’ll see to it. At this point, I am almost tapped out from printing and must still pay for the initial shipping of a few hundred copies of Strawman, so any help in gifting him is much appreciated. Craig has helped me out along the way in too many ways to even mention here. Other examples of his work on Strawman include these:

With all of this said, I can only hope this work was worth the wait, and that it brings forward to each of you what you have been seeking — self evident Truth and knowledge.

The latest version, which is the same as the now printed version (without index), will be posted and the update noted at StrawmanStrory.info and always free to download, with many errors now corrected. This will always be free in its pdf form, so feel free to share it freely, never for profit, with good intent. You cannot possibly steal from he who gives freely, so give without concern.

Now, however, I need you all once again, your word of mouth. Spread the website or give away the pdf at will, and help me to get onto different radio shows to spread this work and more importantly the True and only Law.

Volume II, by the way, is well in the works.

Check back soon at StrawmanStory.info for an updated, final and always free pdf to download.

The time has come that, at least for now and the near future, I am retiring this blog. It will not be actively contributed to anymore by myself. Now, please allow me to explain why.

I feel that I have reached the end of this particular journey. And though my future path remains unclear as of this moment, I have faith that this past journey and the heartbreak it has caused me was not only necessary, but that it will also lead myself and perhaps others to a better place. I am in these strange days at a conscious fork in the road, under what some may call technologically (artfully) the final days of whatever life as we have pretended to know and accept it is.

The following is literally a walkthrough of my time on this earth as an activist turned writer, filmmaker, and radio guest and host. Some of the links provided below have likely not been seen by most of my readers, a personal history lost in the shit-pile of Youtube feces and tabloid nonsense. This is my history (his story) as publicly recored, for better and for worse, and as it remains in that digital ether like the story of a child growing up and out of his own societal, political, and religious delusions.

My future, my path, depends on you. I will either be able to print my life’s work, my new books, or I will not. I will either use those reference books as my tool or I will not. And as for myself, I will either fade away into the obscurity we were birthed into or I will overcome it. Honestly, this option to fade away (or burning out) sounds like a much easier path right about now. And so I am posting here what may very well be my last post on this blog. I am posting here my life story as an activist, writer, filmmaker, radio show host, and guerrilla journalist, all of which I have funded out of my own already empty pockets.

And so Iam asking you the reader, watcher, and listener just what my work has been worth to you?

There are currently 1861 subscribers to this blog. It receives an average of between 500-700 readers per day that click on one of 241 published posts representing uncountable hours of research. A total of 1,422,654 views have occurred over this blogs 7 year history, all of them without charge and certainly without profit and gain for the benefit of their author (figures as of Aug-01-2016). And so I am asking, for the second and last time, that my readers support this tome of research and work by donating to my cause. All donations will be applied solely towards the private printing of my books. If every subscriber donated just $10 today I would reach my goal instantly.

But I have nothing left to offer and certainly nothing to sell, except what I have already given away for free and what I will continue to offer freely in the future. The book is already posted for free download here: StrawmanStory.info, with Volume II soon to follow and be added to the first.

Please donate (click) here:

Or my P. O. Box is at:

Clint Richardson1192 East Draper Parkway #124Draper, Ut 84020

–=–

If you would like a paperback copy of the book, please follow the instructions at the StrawmanStory.info home page, as this would be a purely private, non-commercial exchange.

Here, let me attempt to answer the question as to why you should make a donation.

I can only walk you through my story here, and can only offer my charitable life’s work and research below as the answer to that question. And so below is my personal walkthrough of just that.

I have poured my heart and soul into ten years of dedicated, full-time research, media, and activism, as is evidenced by this extensive blog. I have given the fruit of my labors freely without exception or expectation. I have suffered ridicule and fallacious personal attacks on my character by cowardly persons unknown, unseen, and unmet, and by those who hide behind false names and flattering avatars and titles for reasons I cannot fathom; a paid and usefully unpaid idiocy. I lost one email account and am apparently losing current emails into the nothingness of the cloud. I have had strikingly unreasonable rebukes, a strange absence of searchable content on search engines like Google, and just all around opposition (controlled and otherwise) for telling the untainted Truth that very few want or are capable of hearing. Though few seem to be seeking healthy debate or discussion, many are willing to throw stones and cause stumbling blocks from afar. I suppose this has become the American way, wearing our ignorance like a badge of courage. Hell, no government (mind control) is needed when we are each others own stumbling blocks and worst enemies.

Much of what I had uncovered years ago is now being recognized, propagandized, and institutionalized through an obfuscating normalization process. For instead of being outrightly hushed, it is being brought into public light slowly, as entertainment, so as to protect the pharmaceutical and medical industries that are ultimately responsible for spreading all modern disease through various forms of inoculation, including vaccination.

“After decades of research, scientists think they finally know what turns prions – healthy proteins inside our brains – into the infectious,virus-like pathogens that cause ‘mad cow’ disease, and have also been linked to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s…“

In Truth, this information has been known for decades, intentionally buried by drug companies under actuarial profit projections and insurance matrixes without responsible or even cautious recall. The careless results of such insured and government-approved and licensed irresponsibility (malpractice insurance) certainly could have been avoided if it were not for the religious worship of vaccination and other medical nightmares, which purposefully deliver cross-species infection and the RNA-based DNA reprogramming that leads to cancers and so many other diseases through such unnatural inoculations. Even this article is chalk full of misleading statements, never putting the blame upon the pharmaceutical companies that have hand delivered most modern diseases directly into our veins through the monetarily induced and brainwashed, licensed nurses and doctors that prescribe them, posing as if wasps stinging their prey to deliver their own burden of poisons and parasites.

Pulitzer Prize winner Richard Rhodes warned us in the 1980’s with his book “Deadly Feasts” about this modern, government and medically-induced plague, along with Patrick Jordan and myself (2011-12) intimately exposing it in this new century with 1,000’s of hours of primary research and radio shows on the subject. The amount of suffering that could have been and still can be averted is not qualifiable in blogosphere soundbites. This open secret is kept merely to protect the deliverers of these infectious prions and their profitable “big pharma” corporations, even as most modern “dementia” type dis-ease has in fact been shown to be some form of prion dis-ease as an otherwise impossible cross-species infection. They actually call this “prion misfolding,” which is just another word for “evolution” (the unfolding of man and beast). But who would listen to a lowly old blogger and an obscure couple of unpublished authors that voluntarily sacrificed their entire livelihoods to literally save the population from its own ignorant trust in flatteringly titled, legal “doctors” and the regulatory agencies of government that “educate” and license them in their practice of spreading disease through professional prescription?

Evolution, or as polio vaccine inventor Jonas Salk called it, The Unfolding Of Man, is not merely some random act of Nature. It is a purposeful infection (by a penetrating needle sting) that causes healthy cells to be mis-folded into whatever RNA structure is infecting and reprogramming its functionality and form. This evolution is often called cancerous growth. For instance, the scrapie prion of sheep causes mad-cow disease in cattle, as the genetic programming of the sheep prion attempts to reprogram the specifically and proprietarily naturally programmed cow prion, evolving it and thus causing the symptoms of doctor and drug-induced evolution. This process is called prion misfolding, and foreign prions (all prions of all other species) are called “infectious” for this reason, as they attach to healthy, proprietary (host) prions and literally evolve (unfold) them into copies of their foreignly programed selves.

I do not use this word evolution lightly. This is not a sophomoric religious or scientific debate. This is the real deal. The evil elements in this world have found a way to literally evolve us through these deadly and pretended-to-be incurable, infectious prions. This is the weaponization of the very design of life itself, the purposeful altering of prion proteins that are designed to, by their own source of nature and in a foundational way, protect us from so many special diseases, including most forms of cancer. But these diseases can only happen in man and beast when purposeful cross-species contamination takes place, and only man can contemplate and manufacture such evil in the name of unnatural, unspiritual “science” and “medicine.”

EVOLUTION –noun – [Latin evolutio.] The act of unfolding or unrolling. 1.A series of things unrolled or unfolded; as the evolution of ages… 4. In military tactics, the doubling of ranks or files, wheeling, countermarching or other motion by which the disposition of troops is changed, in order to attack or defend with more advantage, or to occupy a different post.

EVOLVE –verb transitive – evolv’. [Latin evolvo; e and volvo, to roll; Eng. to wallow.] 1.To unfold; to open and expand. The animal soul sooner evolves itself to its full orb and extent than the human soul. 2. To throw out; to emit. – verb intransitive – To open itself; to disclose itself.

EVOLVING –participle present tense – Unfolding; expanding; emitting.

EVOLUTE – noun – An original curve from which another curve is described; the origin of the evolent.

EVOLVENT – noun – In geometry, a curve formed by the evolution of another curve; the curve described from the evolute.

EVOLVED –participle passive – Unfolded; opened; expanded; emitted.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

Jonas Salk, inventor of the injectable, inactivated live-virus polio vaccine that spread so much infectious disease (including polio) around the world due to the un-filterable protein (infectious prion) and DNA strands of Simean Monkey Virus #40 (SV-40) and other infectious cancer viruses mixed with other biological-unfolding agents, later released a selection of very telling books based on his research into this purposeful evolution of life, some of those titles being “Man Unfolding” and “Infectious Molecules and Human Disease.“

The actual history of his ilk’s work is still underreported and ignored as fools line up in droves to accept their devil-in-a-white-coat’s inoculative tribute from nurses that know not the first thing about these pharmaceutical weapons they are paid to deliver under licensure by those syndicalist, organized crime dealers of purchased degrees and diplomas.

–=–

“Official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection.”

–Dr. Albert B. Sabin, inventer of oral or “sugar cube” polio vaccine

–=–

“…nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio vaccine.”

–Jonas Salk, inventor of the first polio vaccine,
testimony before a Senate subcommittee

–=–

“Many here voice a silent view that the Salk and Sabin Polio Vaccines, being made from monkey kidney tissue, has been directly responsible for the major increase in leukaemia in this country.”

–Dr. F. Klenner, MD

–=–

“90% of polio cases were eliminated from statistics by health authorities’ redefinition of the disease when the vaccine was introduced, while in reality the Salk vaccine was continuing to cause paralytic polio in several countries at a time when there were no epidemics being caused by the wild virus.“

–Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

–=–

“Not only did the cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations (a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958, and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959), but the statistics were manipulated by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.”

–1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, excerpt of the testimony of Dr. Bernard Greenberg, Head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of North Carolina School of Public Health

–=–

“We now know that chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis in England) is not a new disease, but simply an ‘aborted form’ of the more serious paralytic polio…“

That the sustained use of polio vaccines for over 40 years has resulted in:

The vaccine for any dis-ease offers no positive healing factor, instead merely presenting an evolution or devolution of that dis-ease’s regiment of symptoms. As Patrick Jordan points out, to cure is to preserve, not to heal. We cure dead animals for later consumption by applying salt or other chemicals. We cure hay as well with salts, preventing its natural petrification but never allowing it to grow as if it were not already attacked and killed at its roots, left to a slow, decomposing death. But this is not healing, for the zombie dead that we are being turned into simply cannot be healed, only preserved (cured).

And though no vaccine manufacturer has ever made any claim or proven to “cure” any disease through vaccination, one must consider that zombies must also be cured so that their dying, petrifying bodies do not fall apart by the man-made diseases that caused their inconvenient disposition. We are certainly being cured in this villainous sense by these pharmaceutical corporations, for to alter the very DNA structure of man and beast, the symptoms of such man-made evolutionary changes must be managed. The body must be made to persevere through its forced alteration into that which is incompatible with Nature. It must be supplemented with poisons and chemical polymers and compounds that are otherwise unusable to the properly folded (un-evolved) man. We are as pieces of patented, copyrighted art being kept by museum curators, our altered and evolved genes continuously re-registered as government property, even as we mutate exponentially into our unwitting, transhumanist future.

For Charles Darwin, we find the term “descent” used in place of evolution in his first offering of “The Descent of Man” (1871), just one year before his “Origin of Species” attempted to fulfill the anti-theist’s wet dream.

It is ironic that this very tool of genetic and unique, non-nucleatoid protein manipulation that is the foreign (infectious) prion actually proves that evolution is quite naturally impossible in the way that Darwin theorized, and that only the adversarial (evil) and artful designs of the sciences of man may forcibly alter the very fundamental designs of Nature (God). The protective element of our natural, inheritable, healthy prion structure is the best and most sound evidence against Darwin’s origin of species argument. We simply cannot tolerate the cells of other species in our bodies, for their very RNA script and programming is diametrically opposed to our own. Hell, we can barley survive our own blood-types being crossed in normal reproduction without man’s interference though pharmacopeia to deaden our immune system that registers a forming baby of a foreign human blood-type as a foreign infection to be destroyed as a systematic dis-ease. Thus, to even suggest this foolish evolutionary theory as sound when considering this modern prion plague is outlandishly ridiculous, for infectious prions to humans are merely the healthy, normally occurring prions of other species. To each species lies its own origins. And to claim knowledge of those origins is only the false imaginations of idolatrous, want-to-be gods.

One of the most spiritual aspects and teachings of the Bible is simply that man can never know the origins of that which is his or any other source of True Existence. This humbling, self-evident knowledge is what drives insane men on such foolish errands in the flattering title of “science.” But the only Truth is that we will never know. We are not supposed to know. We are only supposed to live as we were intended to and by the very protective Design Nature allows. To question the integrity of that design and to seek improvement upon it is the greatest folly of man, who’s modern consciousness seeks only advancement and growth without reason or end. Our lot in life is to protect, not to alter our own Nature.

DESCENT – noun – 1. The act of descending; the act of passing from a higher to a lower place, by any form of motion, as by walking, riding, rolling, sliding, sinking or falling. 2.Inclination downward; obliquity; slope; declivity; as the descent of a hill, or a roof. 3.Progress downward; as the descent from higher to lower orders of beings. 4.Fall from a higher to a lower state or station. 5. A landing from ships; invasion of troops from the sea; as, to make a descent on Cuba. 6.A passing from an ancestor to an heir; transmission by succession or inheritance, as the descent of an estate or a title from the father to the son.Descent is lineal, when it proceeds directly from the father to the son, and from the son to the grandson; collateral, when it proceeds from a man to his brother, nephew or other collateral representative. 7.A proceeding from an original or progenitor. The Jews boast of their descent from Abraham. Hence, 8. Birth; extraction; lineage; as a noble descent. 9. A generation; a single degree in the scale of genealogy; distance from the common ancestor. No man is a thousand descents from Adam. 10. Offspring; issue; descendants. The care of our descent perplexes most. 11.A rank in the scale of subordination. 12.Lowest place. 13. In music, a passing from a note or sound to one more grave or less acute.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

At some point, man becomes unman. At some point, man becomes a proprietary creation of man. At some point, man is no longer a creation of God (the Source of Nature) but an invention of a corporation (artificial person) under the authority of the government that corporation (person) is registered in. That time is upon us. We must choose our master, man’s designer A.I. machine or God’s Nature.

But this “unfolding” is not merely biological, for the mind and moral compass of man’s development must also be evolved to meet the changing nature of these so-called “sciences,” of transhumanism and other unnatural developments as the evolution or unfolding of man continues as an unabated “science.” One does not teach men born to be slaves the language of their masters, lest the carefully divided classes become equals and sit at the same tables. Of course, “education” is the best method towards unfolding (evolving) the impressionable young minds of all men so that they may come to culturally accept such scientific madness as a normality, and even as if it were the natural evolution of man. And are we not seeing just that, as new generations are being systematically confounded and reprogrammed to accept this artificially induced evolutionary process of augmented reality? For the the concept of a New World Order is merely the combining of all that stands in opposition into togetherness, a fusion of the real and unreal, life and non-life, spirit and flesh.

–=–

The Unfolding of Man. Research Note. Educational Policy Research Center – 67-47-

Author: Naranjo, Claudio

“Material gathered from education, religion, medicine and related fields comprises this practical approach to dealing with human development. The unity underlying the multiplicity of ways of growth (150 educational methods or systems) is a recurrent theme. This unity transcends the seemingly diverse intentions of education, psychiatry, and religion. The author contends that close scrutiny may uncover enough of a meeting ground to warrant the ambition of a unified science and ART OF HUMAN CHANGE. Indeed, a consistent view of man’s development will fuse the three currently separated disciplines. The author suggests a phenomenological approach to practical ways of personal growth which provides an experiential meeting ground for diverse techniques, exercises and procedures that would contribute to the UNFOLDING OF MAN. His approach is intended to elucidate two things: (1) THE UNITIY OF SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS VIEWS CONCERNING THE PROCESS OF THE UNFOLDING OF MAN;and (2) the unity of various methods of achieving human growth from the standpoint of experiences these methods elicit, rather than from their external descriptions. (TL)”

Notice here folks: that’s a government website; an “educational” website. That’s the goal of the modern Common Core principle. Government controlled education… no wonder people are patriotic towards their own military occupier and destroyer, for it controls their intake of knowledge and thus hides its own intent. The pawns actually believe they are kings.

This is a multi-front attack. The A.I. is on. All systems go.

Of course the official “education” system will dispense with True religious and moral teaching towards the improved and evolved teaching of man’s scientific control of perceived “chaos” through this artificial, neo-humanistic order birthed from it. Man’s very soul must be misfolded with worthless fruit, the unnatural and seedless (groundless) information from that tree of the good and evil conceptualizations and inventions (fictions) of man.

One last note on this subject:

As I am not credentialed or respected by this official, consensus-based, syndicalist organized criminal element, and proudly so, I will put my thesis here. It is one that can change the world, and thus probably won’t go much further than this page. It is simply that prions prove Darwin’s theory of “natural” evolution to be completely false. In fact, it is this forced, unnatural evolution (unfolding) of man through prion misfolding that shows some form of “design,” be it “intelligent” or otherwise. This is not the point. The point is that cross-species transmission of these smallest of proteinaceous agents is infectious, causing great dis-ease to the host body. In other words, the symptoms are a sign that under no circumstances can two species be compatible, let along derived from each other. If man came from ape, then man’s body should be receptive to its source protein structure and biological programming. But it is not. In all cases of xenotransplantation (animal to human body part replacement) the immune system treats that special part as a foreign infection, and so the immune system must be nullified through pharmacopeia (witchcraft, potions, and poisoning) for the body to accept any foreign transplant. They simply are not compatible in a “natural” way. Thus “natural” evolution, at least as the “origin of species,” is bunk. Cancer is a symptom of evolution, for cancer is a direct response of the body to foreign (non-human) DNA programing, sometimes referred to as cancer “viruses.”

–=–

Viruses that can lead to cancer

Viruses are very small organisms; most can’t even be seen with an ordinary microscope. They are made up of a small number of genes in the form of DNA or RNA surrounded by A PROTEIN COATING.A virus must enter a living cell and “hijack” the cell’s machinery in order to reproduce and make more viruses. Some viruses do this by inserting their own DNA (or RNA) into that of the host cell. When the DNA or RNA affects the host cell’s genes, it can push the cell toward becoming cancer.

–=–

You’ll notice that most “cancer viruses” are from monkeys and other animals, which must be manually (purposefully) injected into the human body to cause infection, or transplanted in some other way. Other viruses that cause cancer, such as HPV, are also foreign agents, in this case a “wart” passed from human to human. The supposed HIV virus is another example, extremely similar to feline immunodeficiency virus (i.e. the supposed cause of feline AIDS), which can only cause disease when injected into the body, either through transmission or other cross-species contact. Whether it is actually a sexually transmitted disease is not clear or proven, and I have never known an unvaccinated (or non-intervenious drug-user) or other “blood product” user via inoculation of foreign or human blood pharmaceuticals to have the symptoms of AIDS or cancer.

This trend in cancer rates was documented in its early stages just after the turn of the 20th century:

–=–

“Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with COWPOX vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.“

–Dr. W.B. Clarke, a prominent physician in Indiana, from Eustace Mullins ‘Murder by Injection,’ pg 132, quoting The National Council for Medical Research, Virginia

–=–

And so I reiterate Dr. Clarke’s respected opinion here when I say that evolution was practically unknown until vaccination became commonplace, and that most modern diseases are in fact the symptoms of cross-species infection through vaccination. Whether vaccination “works” or does not is irrelevant at this point. For it is how they are grown and the delivery of unfiltered proteins and DNA that is the subject at hand. This has nothing to do with the theory of “vaccination” and everything to do with cross-species contamination. There is no left or right, right or wrong. There is only the fact that most of us have been infected with the DNA and prion proteins of many, many different species that vaccine cell substrates are grown on! To this fact, every vaccine insert warns us! This is wholly against every aspect of the Natural Law, the scriptural Law, and the law of reason. To this fact there is no debate.

–=–

“Eaten blood is digested into its components so it ceases to be blood, and the body re-uses the components for different things. Transfused blood is not digested but functions as blood with all its vital properties for life.”

“For the life of the flesh is in the blood…”

—Leviticus 17: 11, 14, KJB

—=—

“VARIVAX [Varicella Virus Vaccine Live (Oka/Merck)]

VARIVAX… is a preperation of the Oka/Merck strain of live, attenuated varicella virus. The virus was initially obtained from a child with natural baricella, then introduced into human embryonic lung cell cultures, adapted to and propagated in embryonic guinea pig cell cultures and finally propagated in human diploid cell cultures (WI-38). Further passage of the virus for varicella vaccine was performed at Merck Research Laboratories (MRL) in human diploid cell cultures (MRC-5)…

Each 0.5 mL dose of vaccine contains the following… residual components of MRC-5 cells including DNA and PROTEIN.“

—Except taken directly from VARIVAX insert from actual vaccine package

–=–

The FDA is certainly aware of all this, and has been for a long time. It is a protective agent not for us, but for the corporations that government invests in and controls. The reader should ask themselves why vaccines are allowed to be used on the public and on pets when this type of information is readily available. But then, the reader would have to lose such fallacies as patriotism and love of country (love of artificial persons). We’s have to face reality, which is just too painful…

–=–

“Potential Risks of DNA in Vaccines

“Residual DNA in vaccines derived from tumorigenic cells, including those transformed by Ad5, can pose potential risks to the vaccine recipient in two respects: oncogenicity and infectivity. Each of these biological properties must be considered and evaluated for each cell substrate.

“The oncogenic risk of cell substrate DNA has been considered to be due to several mechanisms. First, the residual DNA could have dominant activated oncogenes that could exert their effect following expression in recipient cells. In the case of Ad5-transformed cells, the dominant oncogenes would include the E1A and E1B genes. Second,the incoming DNA could integrate into the host genome in certain genes, such as the p53 gene or the retinoblastoma susceptibility (RB) gene, termed tumor suppressor genes, which are involved in cell cycle control among other cellular processes.Loss of function of tumor suppressor genes has been associated with certain human tumors. Third, integration of residual cell-substrate DNA could result in the activation of cellular regulatory genes by promoter/enhancer insertion, and this could result in the development of a neoplastic phenotype; this mechanism for tumor development was initially described in chickens for leukemia formation by avian leukosis viruses. Another result of integration that has been described is an increased methylation of adjacent DNA sequences as well as sequences on other chromosomes, although the consequences of such changes in methylation patterns to a cell are unknown.

“The second biological activity of DNA that should be considered is its potential infectivity.If a genome of a DNA virus or the provirus of a retrovirus is present in the cell substrate used for vaccine manufacture, then the residual DNA has the potential, upon inoculation into the vaccine recipient, to produce infectious virus from this DNA and thus establish a productive infection.

“The assessment of the risk of DNA — both the oncogenic risk and the infectious risk — needs to be considered both in terms of (1) the amount of residual DNA inoculated; and (2) the concentration of oncogene or infectious genome present in this DNA…

“In considering potential risks associated with the use of these so-called Designer Cell Substrates – i.e., neoplastic cells derived from normal human cells transformed by defined viral or cellular oncogenes or by immortalizing cellular genes (e.g., telomerase) – OVRR/CBER is considering the approach outlined below within the framework of a “defined-risks” assessment… “A defined-risks approach to the regulatory assessment of the use of neoplastic cells as substrates for viral vaccine manufacture”, In EVOLVING Scientific and Regulatory Perspectives on Cell Substrates for Vaccine Development… The use of immortalized,neoplastic human cells as substrates to develop recombinant viral vectors as vaccines also raises theoretical concerns with regard to possible contamination with TSE/BSE(Human/transmissible form of Mad Cow Disease) agents.”

—FDA article from FDA website entitled “‘Designer’ Cells as Substrates for the Manufacture of Viral Vaccines”

–=–

We are being unwittingly evolved!

We marvel and cringe at the effects of “mad cow disease,” which is merely a prion disease caused by vaccinating (stinging) a healthy cow with infectiously programed sheep prions, and yet we treat our own madnesses called as the many names of “dementia” as somehow expected, age-related, and naturally occurring. We suffer this evil like good little patients, paying for “cures” that do not work from the very industry that intentionally knowingly infected us in the first place.

But then, the word patient is one of my favorite words, for we have no clue that we are patients of government from our birth. In fact, a citizenship is nothing more and nothing less than a patient of a government institution.

PATIENT –adjective – pa’shent. [Latin patient.] 1.Having the quality of enduring evils without murmuring or fretfulness;sustaining afflictions of body or mind with fortitude, calmness or christian submission to the divine will; as a patient person, or a person of patient temper. It is followed by of, before the evil endured; as patient of labor or pain; patient of heat or cold. 2.Not easily provoked;calm under the sufferance of injuries or offenses; not revengeful. Be patient towards all men. 1 Thessalonians 5:14. 3.Persevering; constant in pursuit or exertion; calmly diligent. Whatever I have done is due to patient thought. 4. Not hasty; not over eager or impetuous; waiting or expecting with calmness or without discontent. Not patient to expect the turns of fate. – noun – A person or thing that received impressions from external agents; he or that which is passively affected. Malice is a passion so impetuous and precipitate, that it often involves the agent and the patient.1.A person diseased or suffering bodily indisposition. It is used in relation to the physician; as, the physician visits his patient morning and evening. 2. It is sometimes used absolutely for a sick person. It is wonderful to observe how inapprehensive these patients are of their disease. –verb intransitive –To compose one’s self. [Not used.]

–=–

What the hell are you all waiting for so patiently???

Now we must remember, only what is a unique or novel creation of man can be patented as property of man’s person (a franchised legal status of government). And the only cure for the disease of man’s law is to be only the property of God’ Nature (Creation). This isn’t religion, it’s common sense. It the Highest LAW, the Law of Nature! And it is completely tainted by the false doctrines of the corporate church, which is merely an authorized, non-profit agent and artificial person of the state, the very state that wishes to become your involuntary god (creator) and master. When man is no longer man, when his genes and genome are newly created, patented property of government and its syndicalist corporate structure, then we will be born slaves. We will carry our person (status) in our very unnatural, trans-human design, the mark of proprietary beasts. For we will have allowed ourselves to deny our own Nature, our own place within God, and instead to become a creation of man.

—=—

“The products of man’s imagination and undisciplined appetite may have a boomerang effect which in due time may well overpower him.”

—Jonas Salk, from: ‘Man Unfolding’

—=—

It is not difficult to understand at all. It’s real simple… Because we are not “religiously” following the Law of Nature, which is laid out succinctly in the Bible, and because we have thus lost respect for the very Laws (Design) of Nature Itself as we try and alter and improve upon them through unnatural evolution, we are dooming ourselves to a literal hell on earth. We are allowing ourselves to be controlled utterly by devils (attorneys).

DEVILING –noun – A young devil. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEVILLING – A term used in London of a barrister recently admitted to the bar, who assists a junior barrister in his professional work, without compensation and without appearing in any way in the matter.(Black’s Law 4th Edition)

DEVIL’S HORNS – When managers focus on an undesirable trait.They do not see future and current success potential. (Black’s Law 4th Edition)

DEVIL –noun – Devl. [Latin, to calumniate.] 1. In the Christian theology, an evil spirit or being; a fallen angel, expelled from heaven for rebellion against God; the chief of the apostate angels; the implacable enemy and tempter of the human race. In the New Testament, the word is frequently and erroneously used for demon. 2.A very wicked person, and in ludicrous language, an great evil. In profane language, it is an expletive expressing wonder, vexation, etc. 3.An idol,or false god.Leviticus 17:7. 2 Chronicles 11:15. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMON – …Evil spirit or genius, which influences the conduct or directs the fortunes of mankind. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMONIAC, DEMONIACAL or DEMONIAN – adjective – 1. Pertaining to demons or evil spirits. 2. Influenced by demons; produced by demons or evil spirits. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

DEMONIAC – Phrensy. – noun – A human being possessed by a demon; one whose volition and other mental faculties are overpowered, restrained, or disturbed, in their regular operation, by an evil spirit, or by a created spiritual being of superior power. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

CALUMNIATE – verb transitive – [See Calumny] To accuse or charge one falsely, and knowingly, with some crime, offense, or something, disreputable; to slander. – verb intransitive – To charge falsely and knowingly with a crime or offense; to propagate evil reports with a design to injure the reputation of another.(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

CALUMNY –noun – Slander; false accusation of a crime or offense,knowingly or maliciously made or reported, to the injury of another; false representation of facts reproachful to another, made by design,and with knowledge of its falsehood; sometimes followed by on. Neglected calumny soon expires. (Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)

–=–

Which demons possess you?

Would you even know as an evolved, unfolded pseudo-man?

What false gods do you allow to bedevil and calumniate you?

Just who or what are the devil’s advocates?

Trust me when I say that truth is way stranger than any church fiction…

For what you may not have comprehended quite yet is that we are speaking here of biological slander, a rewriting of our Source program, as the propagation of evil designs upon our very genomic structure. We are being bewitched and bedeviled at the cellular level, calumniated to an end that will cause us to be abhorrent to our Natural Source, and instead to one made by the design of these evil geniuses (human devils). We are being made criminals from God and Nature, chimeras that must be bound and chained for our offensive natures. Words will no longer be needed in this charge, for our crimes will be spelled out in our DNA sequence chains.

You see the great mystery is that all the monsters in the Bible, as well as all the saints, are just various forms of man. Man is the only species that acts against its own Nature and best interests. And so even as you cry foul and weep at the loss of this world you still refuse to pick up the one book that would save your very life and soul. For the designs of these devils in suits and ties and white lab coats is to make you into mere animals, which translates to soulless beasts, a purposefully designed lack of anima. The Bible is an instruction manual on how to avoid these devils, especially the ones that lurk in the church and state.

–=–

“Devilling, as the period of pupillage or training to become an advocate is generally known, lasts between eight and nine months, and comprises a mix of skills training courses and time spent working with a devilmaster. The compulsory skills training courses, which are described in more detail in the following pages, are spread across the devilling period and last for about nine weeks in total. For the balance of the period of devilling,devils work closely with their devilmasters.

“All devils have a principal devilmaster who is a practicing member of the junior barof at least seven years standing, and working primarily in civil practice.Devils will also spend part of the time with another devilmaster practicing in the criminal courts, and many devils spend a short period of time with a third devilmaster working in a different aspect of civil work from his or her principal devilmaster…

“The Faculty of Advocates is a body of independent lawyers who have been admitted to practice as Advocates before the Courts of Scotland. Faculty records date as far back as 1532when the College of Justice was established by an Act of the Scottish Parliament,though its origins are believed to predate that event.”

—Copied from from official UK website (advocates.org.uk), explaining the act of ‘Deviling’, and finally excerpted from its main “about” page. It is important to note that though this information on the “deviling” page was specifically removed in late 2015, but that its origin remains. This excerpt is taken from a 111 page publication entitled “The Devil’s Handbook,” 12th Edition, 2014/15, published by the Faculty of Advocates, Advocates Library, Parliament House, Edinburgh EH1 1RF

–=–

This is no joke! This is a government publication and is excerpted from a government website. This is the true nature of the umbrella of the International Bar Association (IBA) and its many national members.

But let us not go too far astray. For I have uncovered so much more of this artful design, and have removed the vail and barrier of popular debate from the equation. Debate is the great mountain of obfuscation, which, by its official rules, requires one to protect lies and stand in defense of what one does not believe in. This is professional debate, a tool used to train priests, politicians, and attorneys, or what I call the modern Pharisees.

I knew the debate on what are popularly named as “chemtrails” was over and pointless, for instance, when I found that the most “prestigious” universities around the world were teaching “Geo-Engineering” of the land, air, and seas and offering professional degrees and diplomatic papers (diplomas) therein. No geo-engineering or chemtrail skeptic can overlook the fact that this monster of organized crime against nature, which by illusion labeled (named/noun) as the sponsored and regulated “education” system of government, is offering degrees and therefore a requirement for legal licensure in geo-engineering the entire planet! The debate, I found, was merely a smokescreen as obvious to the senses as the chemtrails themselves, designed to make the common man believe not even his own eyes.

And so we find that all we have been exposing for so many years, decades in fact, is now the subject of dinner conversation and climate change discussions, as we – the boys who supposedly cried wolf – are now conveniently forgotten instead of just outright ignored.

Here is a perfect example of the respect garnered to these false, flattering titles of mega-corporations, as that which is allotted to this syndicalist “education” monopoly of the state. Under the top 10 rankings of schools and universities is listed each one by rank of prestige, with an imaginary, non-referential “score” placed next to each institution as its numerical ranking according to that pretended, apparitional quality of prestige. Ironically, most folks would actually choose which schools they wish to attend by these so-called rankings in “prestige” having no idea the actual root meaning of that word.

LEGERDEMAIN – noun – [See Light.] Slight of hand;a deceptive performance which depends on dexterity of hand; a trick performed with suchart and adroitness,that the manner or art eludes observation. The word is sometimes used adjectively; as a legerdemain trick.

PRESTIGIATOR – noun – A juggler; a cheat.

PRESTIGIATORY – adjective – Juggling; consisting of impostures.

PRESTIGIOUS – adjective – Practicing tricks; juggling.

IMPOSTURE – noun – [Latin impostura. See Impose.] Deception practiced under a false or assumed character;fraud or imposition practiced by a false pretender. —Form new legends, And fill the world with follies and impostures.

–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language

–=–

What is a university but a clearing house of the victor’s falsified histories and instructions in fictional, artful things? What are they but government approved and censored agencies permitted to teach the acknowledgements of men, the synthesis of all things exposed to the filters of these institutions of that Hegelian Dialectic. Oh, how we have been tricked by the magical spellings and artful images (idols) of historical figures that sought only to defeat True knowledge attainment by the masses of illiterates. The dark light of the legerdemain wordsmith, scientist, and mathematician enlightens not the soul, but instead drives it into an adversarial state to stand against its own True Light and Nature.

To quote again, strangely enough, from my own upcoming “Volume II” of the “Strawman” book series:

“In etymology, the English word prestige stems from the word “trick,” taken from the 16th century French prestige, meaning “deceit, imposture, illusion,” and in the Modern French “illusion, magic, glamour.” From the Latin praestigium we get the meaning of “delusion, illusion” as is used for the adjective “prestigious.” Prestige was a derogatory term until the 19th century, where it was applied to Napoleon within the sense of his having politically a “dazzling influence” in 1815.

To be described as prestigious from the 1540’s was to be one who partook in “practicing illusion or magic” and was “deceptive,” stemming from the Latin praestigious as “full of tricks,” and from praestigiae meaning “juggler’s tricks,” which was likely altered by dissimilation from praestrigiae, and from praestringere meaning “to blind, blindfold, dazzle,” from prae “before” (same as pre-) added before stringere “to tie or bind” (as the verb to strain). Again, this was a derogatory term until the 19th century.

This notion of garnering state papers that show degree of education as a diploma (diplomatic papers) is comparable to the noun cachet, meaning a “seal affixed to a letter or document” from the 16th century, stemming from the Old French dialectal cacher “to press, crowd,” and from the Latin coactare “constrain” (cache). The French term lettre de cachet, meaning “letter under seal of the king,” made the evolutionary linguistic transliteration as a “(letter under) personal stamp (of the king)” to the modern word “prestige.”

A diploma is simply permission from the state to commit a certain degree of crime while acting in the states fictional (legal) persona; to take upon the surname a flattering title that would be unlawful to possess and profess for those not brainwashed by the syndicalist education monopoly.

In fact the etymological meaning of the very word education is shockingly defined from the 1530s as, “childrearing,” equivalent to “the training of animals,” from Middle French education (14c.) and directly from Latin educationem (nominative educatio) “a rearing, training,” the noun of action from past participle stem of educare (educate). The origin of education was as the instruction in social codes and manners; the meaning “systematic schooling and training for work” is from 1610s.

Let’s face it, all beasts of burden, including, as the U.S. Code repeatedly defines us, “man and other animals,” need to be trained for our place in animal husbandry and human trafficking under this human capital management system.

But hey, don’t worry, after reading this work you can always beg to be re-educated and placed back into the prestige of that fictional matrix of civil “life.” Just believe…

As for the intent of this institutionalized corporate structure of public education, it is to pre-strain an individual, meaning to limit knowledge to a particular direction or practice. The verb strain comes from around 1300, meaning to “tie, bind,fasten, gird,” from the present participle stem of Old French estreindre “bind tightly, clasp, squeeze,” from the Latin stringere meaning “draw tight,bind tight, compress, press together,” and also “to stroke, rub, press” with cognates from Lithuanian stregti “congeal, freeze, become stiff;” Greek strangein “twist;” Old High German strician “mends nets;” Old English streccian “to stretch;” and from German stramm and Dutch stram meaning “stiff“). From late 14th century it takes the meaning of “tighten; make taut,” and also to “exert oneself; overexert (a body part),” with the sense of “press through a filter,put (a liquid) through a strainer” also from early 14th century, while the meaning of “to stress beyond measure, carry too far, make a forced interpretation of” is from mid-15th century.

Ultimately, the university accreditation system is merely an authoritarian, for-profit monopoly that stands both as the barrier of true knowledge and as the forced source of officially bestowed permissive ability to participate or practice in most regulated commercial functions of government. The word authority, as it applies to the university school system, literally stems from autorite “book or quotation that settles an argument,” from the Old French auctorité “authority, prestige, right, permission, dignity, gravity; the Scriptures.” The Modern French autorité, from the Latin auctoritatem (nominative auctoritas), has the meaning of “invention, advice, opinion, influence, command,” from auctor “master, leader, author.” Most poignantly, this word authority from the late 14th century has the meaning of “power to enforce obedience,” and as “people in authority” is from the 1610s. Authorities in modern times was recorded as “those in charge, those with police powers” since the mid-19th century.

The song lyrics Teach Your Children Well comes to mind. For to have power over “education” by promoting the word-trickery of prestige over governmental institutions, this monopoly on knowledge can be retained by those keepers of mysteries in high authority. Oz can thus remain hidden behind a curtain of idiocy spelled out as a pretended history (his-story) in those prestigious text books.

The monopoly of education is dystopia.

Utopia cannot stand or thrive on ignorance.”

–=–

It is an amazing feeling to realize that the “professors” of “professions” are really just full of their own peers’ manufactured shit, corrupted to their capacity on the fiction of artful concepts and spoiled fruit from the fig-apple tree of worthless knowledge, being passed on to future generations just as it was “educationally” passed on to their animal selves. Imagine the arrogance it takes to accept a “masters” degree in anything taught by those who as well received their own “masters” degree from another manufactured “master” and so on. That a 23 year old “adult” can be awarded a certificate of “mastery” in anything is as ridiculous as the Mormon “Church” corporation sole assigning the flattering title of “elder” to 12 year old kids and doing so not in their christian name, but in their legal surname, totally against the scriptures. This is how flattering titles (names) are used, carrying no substance of the reality they formally represent (in artificial form/character/person/title), just as the clothes do not make the man. Mastery is a lifetime achievement, and one often recognized publicly only after the death of that master. A “Masters” degree, however, is currently on sale for $99,999. It is a name, a title, not a reality. Education, position, and status for sale; a devil’s contract of monetary and performance debt. To the cheater, to one raised to be a cheater and to summarily respect the prestige of university word magic and legerdemain trickery without question, it is par for the course that one should fallaciously flaunt a piece of paper sealed by the state so as to cheat even themselves out of ever Truly mastering anything at all, aside from their assigned and professed degree of crime and aptitude in their chosen, commercially professed fiction. Such professions are like invisible prisons for the mind, with humility nowhere to be found and where cognitive dissonance blossoms.

Likewise, to have a Masters in the English language is about as reasonable as having a prize for the most prestigious dingleberry in ones upper butt crack, professing oneself to a state-sanctioned mastery of what Mark Twain called the most “mongrel” language, a literalist word construction known also as “dog-Latin,” which was grammatically built for the purpose of mass public deception and illiteracy. The names of things we learn at 3 years old never change throughout our commercial livelihoods, for the metaphor and the parable is completely lost on the publicly educated, literalist English speaker, while their legal and “Romantic” origins reak havoc upon society. We learn the empty monetary value of all things by their names (nouns), but never the substance and essence of that which is enslaved by such artificial valuation and empty nomenclature. Strangely, we only know words by their name, not their substance or True meaning and Nature. And this explains the foundation of all our problems.

—=—

“So, we start with the question, now, as to why we cannot ask the question why? And that is because of the absence of knowledge of first cause… At school, for instance, we learn to liken words to objects. But even when we apply the word to the object, we have lost something. We have lost inner-meaning.We call things by the name. We say this is a “carrot.” And we therefore get a good mark on our examination paper. But what is a “carrot?” Neither the student nor the teacher knows, actually. It becomes merely a term to define the fact that we have accepted the language which we are studying, and that in that language, this particular vegetable is a “carrot.” But this does not tell us a thing about the “carrot.” It only divides it from some other vegetable. Why it is divided, how it is divided, what the life means, we do not know. But from the very earliest times, human beings attempted to find ways of learning the true meaning of the things which they classified… They made likenesses of the thing they were trying to discover or decide. And in this way they had a little more dimension than we get from words… Words have to be carefully considered and weighed. They can be the cause of war. They can result in riots. They can bring down the stock exchange in a bad catastrophe. They can do all kinds of things to us that we cannot appreciate or understand. And just as we are not permitted by law to injure other persons physically, we must sometimes realize that we can more profoundly influence and injure them verbally… Now,children today aren’t taught basic language. They are taught the names of things,and believe that (because) they have the name that they know the thing. So that if someone asks them, what is a “carrot,” they are apt to say “a vegetable,” and get the correct mark. But they don’t know what a character is, or a “carrot,” or anything else. They do not understand,but they consider the subject closed by the name. And the same is true in many different levels and developments of life. We give names to things, answer them according to their names, and consider that enough. This is one of the points that was made… in connection with education; the problem of finding out the names of things in terms of meaning. And the way to gain meaning is to recognize the basic vitality of the subject under discussion… In other words you have to be able to feel the facts of a thing, not merely listen to it and buy dictionaries.You have to participate in the experience of something in order to know it. And that was why such an emphasis was placed upon pre-school education. The problem is very certain that the faculties of true understanding have to be developed before schooling comes, or the schooling will be very largely rejected. We will finally end up with the individual memorizing the words and knowing nothing about the substance.So the person has to learn to recognize substance first.And the first substances of life are not learned in school, but in the pre-school period of childhood in which the association with adults or with others of its own age group, these result in certain basic experiences of like and dislike, of exception and acceptance and rejection. These things we gradually learn intuitively, then when education comes, we give meaning to words. Otherwise we give no meaning, and we just keep on using words without giving them any substance, essence, or vitality…“

“Historians, of course, use words to influence the reader. And it is generally admitted today that 90% of history is written by victors at the expense of the vanquished.And we always make a villain out of the loser, regardless of circumstances. So, we have all kinds of problems in history. We take the words; we believe them.But we don’t know whether they are true or not… We decide that the historian is correct if we agree with him. He is incorrect if we disagree with him. When in reality the facts of the matter are seldom actually considered.”

—Manly P. Hall, from his recorded lecture on “Language: the Use, Misuse and Abuse of Words”

—=—

Today’s “historians” seem to have been metamorphosed into bloggers and shock jocks on radio, news outlets, and newspapers, and as actors in Hollywood. Historical “facts” are delivered sometimes even before modern events ever happen. And so it is safe to embrace Mr. Hall’s perception that 90% of history, including that being broadcast and recorded instantly and live on the spot, is likely only the sponsored and paid for opinions of a powerful propagandist regime we call as our government. This model goes well with Huxley’s opinion that 90% of the population is quite hypnotizable in different degrees. No one seems to want to face the Truth that we are a morally, spiritually, and educationally defeated people. For that would mean inevitably that we are as well a militarily conquered people, and that our so-called government is actually the victor of this information war.

Fortunately in my own journey, my early research uncovered this design in totality. And I found that the definition of that word “conquer” actually carries the same meaning as the word “purchase,” and that the word “military” simply means thee entirety of the “Executive” enforcement branch of government. Let us not pretend that their money system, which no one can seem to deny, has certainly conquered us all. For the very industries that this government sanctioned education system grants degrees of crime and licensed (anarchical) diplomacy to are also the private and public stock corporations that government collectively owns through its international investment schemes. For it only seeks the most impressionable, hypnotizable of fools to fill with the most human of false pride those flatteringly titled positions of tenure and public employment. Only he who is most impressed and indebted by the word magic and prestige of their own paid-for educational experience will be accepted into bearing such prestigious flattering titles of professional and nonsensical conduct, bound in every way by their original performance debt of citizenship in agency to that principal government.

And so the reader should pay close attention to my much earlier, foundational research into CAFR’s, which shows government to be the main shareholder of ALL important and influential corporate stock through its non-governmental and pension investment schemes in all corporations around the world, especially in those pharmaceutical companies that have caused so much destruction of life and health in all nations and tribes.

To be clear, the regulator (government) regulates the corporations it owns through stock investment and indirectly votes (as collective shareholder) through proxy vote for the boards of directors, mergers and acquisitions, and other corporate governance issues. The regulator regulates its own corporate empire, a syndicalist domain of pure and utter “legalized” corruption. When government is the main or even partial shareholder of corporations as the design of “fascism” is said to be, and when the highest law of corporations is to protect its shareholders, then its oil companies are not made to clean up their spills and its pharmaceutical companies are allowed to lie to the public and kill in the name of scientific medicine in the name of profit and gain. And this is why primary research is so important, for they do not lie to government, only to us.

Of course, to be published one must cover up the Truth, which is why journals never do what we have done, explaining the entire cover-up publicly for full comprehension. When government owns through stock investment and voting powers the totality of mainstream media that, if it were actually independent, would otherwise criticize and report all aspects of the organized crime of government, then one should immediately recognize this conflict of interest and turn away from such an obvious propaganda outlet.

While Project Mockingbird is well known and even blatantly admitted on the CIA’s own website, we must realize that this sort of clandestine infiltration into the media is no longer necessary. For when government owns the majority holding of stock, it calls the shots by proxy. And those board members for which it collectively votes into each corporate boardroom certainly will not depose the hand that owns and feeds it. For the shareholders also proxy vote and approve salaries, raises, and bonuses for those syndicalist members of its held corporations.

But it is fun to remember when at least we believed the organized crime was on the outside, that it was imported into these media companies instead of being merely homegrown and quite expected and business as usual…

–=–

“You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple hundred dollars a month.”

–CIA operative, discussing the availability and prices of journalists willing to peddle CIA propaganda and cover stories. Katherine the Great, by Deborah Davis

–=–

“The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals,scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets.“

“There is quite an incredible spread of relationships. You don’t need to manipulateTime magazine, for example, because there are [Central Intelligence] Agency people at the management level.“

–William B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer, briefing members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, The CIA and the Media, by Carl Bernstein

–=–

“The Agency’s relationship with [The New York] Times was by far its most valuable among newspapers, according to CIA officials. [It was] general Times policy ... to provide assistance to the CIA whenever possible.“

–The CIA and the Media, by Carl Bernstein

–=–

“The history of the CIA’s involvement with the American press continues to be shrouded by an official policy of obfuscation and deception for the following principal reasons:

■ The use of journalists has been among the most productive means of intelligence‑gathering employed by the CIA. Although the Agency has cut back sharply on the use of reporters since 1973 primarily as a result of pressure from the media), some journalist‑operatives are still posted abroad.

■ Further investigation into the matter, CIA officials say, would inevitably reveal a series of embarrassing relationships in the 1950s and 1960s with some of the most powerful organizations and individuals in American journalism.

Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were Williarn Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the LouisviIle Courier‑Journal, and James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company (ABC), the National Broadcasting Company (NBC), the Associated Press (AP), United Press International UPI), Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps‑Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, the Miami Heraldand the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald‑Tribune.

By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with the New York Times, CBS and Time Inc.“

“If even one American overseas carrying a press card is a paid informer for the CIA, then all Americans with those credentials are suspect… If the crisis of confidence faced by the news business—along with the government—is to be overcome, journalists must be willing to focus on themselves the same spotlight they so relentlessly train on others! …When it was reported… that newsmen themselves were on the payroll of the CIA, the story caused a brief stir, and then was dropped.”

“Over the past several years, the Bush administration has learned that it can engage the press in an adversarial way, and the public won’t mind. It’s yet another step in MANAGED NEWS…“

“Senator William Proxmire has pegged the number of employees of the federal intelligence community at 148,000… though Proxmire’s number is itself a conservative one. The “intelligence community” is officially defined as including only those organizations that are members of the U.S. Intelligence Board (USIB); a dozen other agencies, charged with both foreign and domestic intelligence chores, are not encompassed by the term… The number of intelligence workers employed by the federal government is not 148,000, but some undetermined multiple of that number.”

–Jim Hougan, ‘Spooks’

–=–

“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a POLICY-MAKING ARM of the government… I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into PEACETIME cloak and dagger operations.“

–Former President Harry Truman, 22 December 1963, one month to the day after the JFK assassination, op-ed section of the Washington Post, early edition

–=–

Now, how do you think this type of government infiltration of the CIA could happen? The answer is that no infiltration never really needed to happen. All corporations are government-created corporations, registered under the commercial protection of government, and the maxim of law states clearly that protection requires subjection. That goes for all subjects, all public (registered) citizenships (natural persons) and corporations (artificial persons). The government funded, floated corporate bonds, and over the years invested in the majority stock of all media and other corporations. The stockholders thus collectively and in consensus through private, non-governmental associations (NGOs) voted for the boards of directors of all those media corporations and in turn the governmentally hand-picked board of directors votes for their CEOs. And the conglomeration and monopolies formed since were simply government proxy shareholder votes pooled together for supporting mergers and acquisitions, as well as loose regulation and deregulation of such otherwise unlawful trusts.

Of course the CIA is the media. Duh!

This is syndicalism.

The regulator protects itself by protecting that which it has an interest in and which is also subject to its laws, never allowing the Truth to spill over in any comprehensible way for public consumption. And so when we out here independently without papers and pedigrees expose this stuff publicly we are made to appear like crazy nut-balls without perspective by those trained lapdogs, and our lack of syndicalistic “credentials” apparently means that our neutral research should be dismissed outright, despite the fact that all of it is the officially sourced materials of government unstarched for and thus unseen by the average person, as that which is never publicized in any revealing or talked about way. Most just pull out their imaginary copy of the constitution and beat it over our heads, pretending it was created for the common subject. More idiocracy, fro the preamble lets us know exactly who created the constitution and who its legacy is inherited to.

As George Carlin comedically but with all due seriousness and integrity stated:

–=–

“The real looting in this country takes place in the transfer of the wealth from the poor to the rich… and the poor have been systematically looted in this country. The rich have been made richer under this criminal, fascist president and his government.”

—George Carlin

–=–

What George didn’t mention is that “the rich” is merely a colloquialism for the bloodline, the private, feudal landholders, the family business, which is the commercial United States. Of course, the common people are still convinced that being a “white person” in law has anything to do with skin color, and that “Barrack Obama” is actually a black person. Silly rabbits, persons aren’t Real. Persons are words on paper. They have no “color” except the ink they are printed with. A person (legal status) is whatever government says it is.

Syndicalism requires both the compartmentalization and the character assassination of any who refuse their grant of credentialism, which includes the imaginary division of races. Never is the True nature information disputed, only the public’s perception of the messenger. Works every time… Hell, people still believe that David Duke is a member and Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazi Party, though almost forty years has passed since that affiliation.

Well then in full disclosure I must therefore admit, I once (and only once) went to a “witchcraft” coffee shop meet-up here in Salt Lake City because I was curious why so many covens existed here around the Mormon corporation, which therefore means I must be witch. But in context, I was interested in the fact that the “profit” (president) of the so-called church was born of Anne Hutchinson, a condemned witch in Salem, Mass, which was posted in a chart at their own genealogy center! Guess they thought no one would look at Mrs. hutchinson history, because now her name is magically vanished from that genealogy chart. Guess that’s what happens when you speak the Truth on local AM radio in the heart of Mormon history!

Of course, the only magic I saw was the miraculous disappearance of any tip for the barrister.

For those interested in the real magic that ails them through the magic wand of the vaccination needle, my initial research and construction of the prion plague can be found here, though most of our more recent research was exposed over the radio:

Patrick Jordon’s continuum of many books, including his latest “The Prion Agenda,” as well as many other sources can be found here: vaccinefraud.com

Examples of Patrick’s and my own many radio shows are linked below, where this evolutionary process through pharma-science “medicine” and the spread of animal and insect prions into the human body is exposed thoroughly. Note that the amount of research put into these shows represents both of our life’s work, and cannot be qualified in any other way.

Oh, and by the way, they are now aerosolizing prions, and my documentary shows why this is perfectly legal. Breath it in, baby…

But by all means, let’s keep ignoring this plague and its promoted delivery system as our friends, family, and eventually our own bodies are degraded and “evolved” (unfolded) in ways unimagined throughout all of modern history, except perhaps in some obscure genres of science fiction. And God forbid that the profits of the medical industry could be harmed by the consequences of such a disclosure. After all, the most profitable gains collected from the spread of disease is only in the treatment of the symptoms that the villainous infector causes, right?

Instead, let us keep doing habitually what the Laws of Nature forbid, polluting and cross-contaminating our bodies with the DNA and infected protein (prions) of every species on the planet through vaccination, including aborted human fetal tissue.

Even more insane, these infectious prions and their antibodies are available for purchase from several biologic companies. For instance, you can buy “GOATANTI HUMAN PEROXIREDOXIN 2 (C-TERMINAL)” here:

This biomedical madness is the thing true terrorism is potentially made of. It’s not even a black market, but quite in the open, where infectious disease and cancerous cells are showcased like whores in the Red Light District. It’s like children (elders) buying unlimited and unregulated candy at the local 7-11. And this anti-human prion plague has been transmitted to every vaccinated man, woman, or child reading this.

While this is just one example of what we have uncovered, sourced in triplicate after years of research collection and cogitation, it may help my readers in empathizing with my own frustration and profound sadness as my life’s research goes unheard and unheeded for lack of my own holding of any soul-eating syndicalist university credentialism. Of course, most of this hell on earth comes directly from that University system, where life itself is being patently (as property) altered (evolved) into some unique (novel) form and catalogued on behalf of government’s investment scheme in the genomic mapping horror film of all life… and subsequently of all that is therefore anti-life.

I explained in full detail, after months of intense research and contemplation, the very DNA of the education system here, how it works and why it would and should be immediately disrespected and dismantled… that is if any rational sense was left over in mankind after our minds have been “unfolded” by these human development and resource (slave) management corporations.

But who among us wishes to discover that our own diploma (legal, diplomatic papers) are only a sign and token of our own agentic conformity, acceptance, allowance, and syndicalism to this completely evil, totally government-funded, conspiratorial education system? Who wants to admit that education is to teach you what to think in a “profession” but not how to think or question its authority, causing one to be licensed and permitted only to profess what government compartmentally allows us to? Who wants to acknowledge that their bought-and-paid-for position of employment and legal status under a legal, flattering title of diplomacy and licensure under the legal state can only be accomplished by loving (believing) or at least pretending to believe and practice in the official story and history that every industry is built around? Who would give up their money, their pensions, their 401k, even when it is patently obvious that all one has was bought purely by filthy lucre?

Who among us that is “successful” because of their “education” and papers is willing to accept that the etymological meaning of the word education is “the training of animals,” the word animal meaning a “soulless” beast of burden or “domesticated pet?” Who wants to admit that their employment is slavery under contract, and that their moral will is decimated by that contract with the devils (attorneys) of those corporations?

Who wants to stand up against the grain to expose the Truth about their very own industry and artificial status (title) within it knowing that their funding and artificial, “professional” respect in that criminal syndicate and paychecks in mammon will be lost? No, it is better that billions suffer and die than to risk that scarlet letter of a true whistleblower.

Ironically, the reason I have nothing, the reason I am “poor” and almost destitute in material things is because I consciously and physically turned away from such false, flattering titles granted by the gods of the state. I turned towards the only Truth, the anti-fiction, slowly moving away from all artifice back into the True Nature of all things. I saw through the names and felt the emptiness of them. My own bought and paid for diploma is worthless for my lack of conformity and tribute to such syndicalism. I allowed myself to feel, to embrace the repulsion I contracted towards my own industry of choice, and to allow the responsibility of my actions to rest upon my own shoulders, not that of the artificial person (corporation) I pretended to be an “moral agent” (employee) of. I quit Hollywood. I quit entertainment. I quit propaganda. I quit making fiction that is adversarial to God and Nature, which in turn bars man’s enlightenment and replaces it with the darkest of false lights.

My particular story is here, a powerful and very personal testimony to the choices we all make and the evils that we pretend don’t exist because of our own participation and syndicalist self-interest in the world of legalism and corporations (artificial personhood). When our jobs truly depend on our being silent to such evils, then we are certainly consenting to and are in legal fact a willing participant of that evil.

Like so many out there still retaining some conscious awareness and still not plagued with pharmaceutical drugs, I used to think that I was somehow different, that something was wrong with me. I wasn’t “normal.” I could not fit into any part of this artificial matrix culture and commercially driven society no matter how much effort I put into the practice. I couldn’t stop asking questions and demanding answers. And so with every educational trade I pretentiously “mastered” I would ultimately cease in its pursuit as a career, recognizing its artful intentions as being purposefully and by design against the best interests of man and Nature. I could not control my sense of righteousness, my strict moral rectitude bounding from within, and thus my words would always get me in trouble as I expressed my True feelings and spiritual Nature in defense of the innocent. Among the Jews of Hollywood, this spiritual strength is a tangible death mark, a black ball, a self-sacrifice. For them, only goyim (voluntary slaves) need apply.

And so this was my journey, continuously uncovering the unnatural and criminal element of all things, both normalized and customary. It led me to join others of like mind, holding up signs and calling bullshit on everything around us, exposing lie after lie without remedy or solution, like a bunch of old men complaining about everything and everyone but themselves, pretending that there was some better time or system we must return to. But no such time actually exists, and all history is a lie. It is in fact this powerful but unprovable belief (faith) in some formerly unseen and better time that causes men in each new generation to never strive to achieve their own mutual perfection, always chasing the historical fallacy of their own tails of their forefathers without comprehension that they were already cut off and attainted at birth.

Below, I have accumulated the history of this last 10 or so years of my journey of discovery, evidential videos and articles of my strange path into the complete absurdity of legal fiction and finance and of the artifice of government. I have done this because, as this very well may be my last post on this blog and because I’m extremely tired and heavy-hearted, broken-hearted, I and am left wondering exactly what all this effort has been worth? Has it changed anything? Has it helped anyone? Have my heavy sacrifices all been in vain? And did I fool myself all this time into believing that I could change the world around me simply by uncovering the lies that surround our collective perception of what that world actually is?

I have raised about a quarter of what I need to raise in order to print in soft-cover book format the conclusion to my life’s work and research. I fearfully anticipated that this would be the case, seeing so many come into this fold only to never find the support of those who praise, criticize, and complain the loudest. And so I am making here one last case, one last cry out for help from anyone who has found value and attained before unknown knowledge from my many works and years of writing, research, and film-making. There are again over 1,800 subscribers on this blog, and the site has had over 1,400,000 views according to its statistics. My movies have been watched by 100’s of thousands, with “Lethal Injection: The Story of Vaccination” for instance having 147,000 views alone, not counting the many mirrored copies and DVDs I encouraged folks to spread freely over Youtube and other outlets, which now cannot be counted.

I am left in awe by the thought of even asking humbly for $1 from each of you in appreciation of the hours, no, years, no, a third of my adult LIFE that it took for me to comprehend and create those documentary films and to research and construct this blog. I marvel at what I could do if I was funded and had a platform unbound by financial constraints, a dream perpetually unrealized by so many like myself, who die the most miserable and unsatisfied men without selling out in conformity to such prestigious powers that pretend to be.

And so I am asking, in this final effort, that anyone reading this please donate what you think my work might be worth. If each reader that subscribes here donated $10 or $20, the price of 2 or 4 of those daily doses of poisonous Starbucks coffees, then I could preserve my book in printed form and hopefully begin a new journey of activism incomparable to this one. And to anyone that seeks a copy of this work once printed, I am still offering it as a gift in exchange for a gift of $30, sort of like a pre-order. It will be printed. The only question is whether or not I must go into personal debt AGAIN just to get my work out there for free!

So please, let me know that all of this was not in vain.

For those unfamiliar with all of my past works, please see all the videos and links below, an incomplete accumulation to be sure but still the strange story of my life and research.

There was a time when I could not have imagined becoming so sensitive in my awareness, that I could actually figure out “the system” and then actually possess the answers to almost every reasonable and even unreasonable question put forward to me. Now that I have reached that point, standing on top of a giant pile of clarified stinky-smelly crap, I realize why so very few arrive here while navigating that shit-storm of false dialectics and popular opinion websites. For to know the Truth one must sacrifice themselves to that ultimate and undeniable Reality, feeling its every pain and pleasure while suffering all the depressions and detachments that naturally must accompany such a transition, for a sacrifice without the purest of Loving intent is merely a loss, a slaughter. One must criticize oneself to no end, realizing and then shedding any fictional notion of legitimacy in ones own employments, status, estate, and memberships. One must despoil any prestige one might profess and pretend. One must Truly take off all the make-up and clothing, all of the false and flattering titles and impressions, the false show and dressings, the pomp and circumstance, so as to finally see oneself in and only as a True Light. It is not as easy as looking in the mirror, for that reflection is always false, 2-dimentional, and without soul, Source, or sense. One must find oneself without such artificial means, no longer seeing without understanding and hearing without listening.

The Truth is not salable. It has no price tag. It cannot be valued in anything but what is the priceless Reality of Nature. Self-evident, Self-Existent Truth is timeless and always defensive, never offensive. It harms only lies and the liars who live by and trust in them. It needs nor requires no debate to Exist. The Truth may only offend fiction, lies, and false beliefs, all of which are offensive to the Truth, and all of which make up a citizenship.

The so-called “truth movement” doesn’t practice actual Truth-telling, for that would be unprofitable. It would require ego-death. It would require admission to our own volunteerism and use, which makes the commercial world go round. Even the principles (maxims) of law legally allow lies to be confirmed and ratified (legal) truths; for black to be white and left to be right, so long as that truth is constituted, contracted, confirmed, ratified, and made “legal,” then believed in (loved) and lived by in the performance debt of membership (citizenship).

Government can lie to the public, but the public cannot lie to government. This was the recent “excuse” offered in support of Hillary Clinton’s lies about her emails to the public.

—=—

“There’s no particular penalty for lying to the public, unless the public get tired of it. But there’s a real penalty for lying to the FBI.”

—Senator Mitch McConnell, speaking on the known fact of Hilary Clinton’s lies to the public about her emails in 2016, speaking honestly to the public on CBS news

—=—

Remember, it is perfectly legal for anyone to lie to the public, including myself, Alex Jones and the rest of the mainstream (pretending to be alternative) media. Fox News even reestablished this fact in court! When your own senator comes out public to reveal that there is no law or sanction (punishment) for government (including a future presidential candidate) to lie to the public, how do you go on supporting and being a subject of that government, of that kingdom and its kings of lies?

Here’s an example of why corporations and agents of government have the right to lie to the public as “free speech” of “artificial persons,” but why “individuals” or “natural persons” (an oxymoron) can never lie to government (owner of the public persons/titles/statuses) we pretend to be.

But what about the news agencies themselves lying to the public? As long as its not a lie told to government, anything goes…

Watch this:

—=—

But “Infowars” would never lie, right?

—=—

And to understand just what “ethics” is in government, and how the legislature actually has no watchers, but instead judge each other in their organized crime, see my expose here, which includes how much they pay themselves. I guarantee once you finish this article you will have no doubt why no actual ethics exist in government.

The “truth movement” does not preach to its listeners the virtue of being (living) at all times in the Natural Truth (within only Nature and under It’s Highest Laws), for then no one would be glued and listening to a damned artificial construct and machine receiver as if it were Real. No one would attach themselves to this fictional, illusionary, virtual online matrix, and would instead embrace their very own Nature and their place within it without such artifice and useless information. The war would only be to keep such information from being spewed in replacement of spiritually driven knowledge. Just as the Church never teaches the True poetic and parabolic verse of the Bible it claims to support and worship, political writers in their prose would never be paid and talking-heads would not be amplified if the subject was what the only self-existent, self-evident Truth actually is. I am a living testament to this fact. Stations and networks would collapse under the weight of deaf ears as we all went out to rediscover the calming frequencies of that uneventful silence of Nature again, the sounds of the True Design of Life uninterrupted by fictional and monetary considerations. Youtube addicts would recede from their electromagnetic programming waves in dark basements and seek instead the tides of the oceans, sunny beaches, and vegetable gardens without commerce. Youtube would be replace with you- topiary. No one would allow themselves to be employed (used in agency as a tool) by another ever again, working only the land for themselves and toward the enrichment and nurturing (True wealth) of all others, realizing the most important Truth that labor is property, and that methodically trading it for money is voluntarily a surrender to evil geniuses (devils); to men with contractual, corporate, artificial power to take what we so foolishly and willingly give. For we would realize that even as new forms of money are promoted to us by such outlets of supposed truth, from gold to “Bitcoin” to the already developing international cashless society of global commerce, that all forms of money require respect and love (belief in) the valuation of that form of money upon all things, that Life and Nature itself can be valued in money, and that money or what it is traded for is never the property of the petty user. To love the pretended substance of money when in Reality it exists only in empty form is the root of all evils. This is the only Truth about money, for that which is not of self-evident Truth cannot ever Exist in any permanence of foundation, but rather only in a purposefully and carefully controlled chaotic flux managed by its demented patenters. For though all things may be valued in money, money is always valued in nothing. This is a maxim (principle) of law. What is valued in money is always corrupted. It is the valuation of the name, the form, the use, and the insurable appearance, but never the substance, the source, and the soul. This is mammon…being not merely that specific tool of money, but the artificial valuation of that which is the priceless, timeless wonder and beauty of Nature. The turning of Source into re-source, including governments corporate structure of commercial human resource management that we call as public citizenship but which is really modern feudalism. Only a slave romanticizes his own enslavement. Only a slave worships and even votes for his next master.

Nature and all life within its realm is priceless, but it may be destroyed when the valuation of mammon is placed upon its bounty, and thus by the mercenaries (soldiers for hire’s) hand it may be sacrificed in pointless slaughter for a price and without Love and respect for its Laws. The soldier is like any other employee in contract to do as his principal instructs and pays for. Of course, the word soldier comes from the Latin word solidus, which was a Roman gold coin. A soldier is a mercenary for pay. There is no other Truth. If that somehow offends you, then you must consider that the undeniable, self-evident Truth offends you. And you may then continue consciously lying to yourself. Pretend all you want that these men aren’t induced into contract with the state to kill and given bonuses, benefits, pensions, and a paycheck.

In the so-called truth-movement, the worst kinds of men are celebrated as “true” heroes. The beauty of finding the only Truth of the Nature of all things is that no longer can words, names, titles, and actions like cold-blooded murderer for pay be twisted into some governmental and propagandist actuarial report and then claimed to be an act of honor. A killer for hire has no honor, even and especially when he is wrapped in the American flag of maritime commerce and war. Give me a militia man fighting for his and his like-minded neighbor’s homeland, family, and spiritual freedom from government without consideration of money and I will show you all respect for that man’s actions. But, as the Bible continuously warns, I will never respect any man due to his false and flattering title of authority, nor his actions taken cowardly there under its artificial persona and protection. There is also no excuse to break the Highest Law of Nature, especially the excuse of that root of all evil and the authority of men in false, fictional, legally flattering titles.

But then, I would need here to show you my huge research project called Cracking The Cult Of The Constitution, perhaps some of my most important work, before this patriotic nonsense and support of that which domestically enslaves us under the Leiber Code could be broken. For a civil war is a war of words, names, and titles, not of men. And the American civil war never ended. I’d have to show you the congressionally confirmed and ratified presidential dictatorship that is the Executive CEO and CIC (president) under emergency military rule before you could see that our military is occupying our civil society and protecting government and its private, landholding bloodline from the multitude of us:

What use is all the gold and oil in the land when the land itself is becoming so polluted and useless that no amount of money can be used to fix it? What use is money if it is not being used to ensure the wealth of all others and to protect the Source of our very own Existence and best interests? What is money without equitableness, without adherence to the Natural Law that forbids such accumulation of wealth beyond need or measure at the expense of all others?

The only Truth about money, the only final winning argument in any monetary debate, is the simple and obvious self-evident conclusion that money is not Real. It is not of Nature; not of Source. No matter how you may cleverly try to justify its existence and its use by some pretended, always fluctuating, temporary value made up by bankers in their own fictional realm, its value can never escape that fictional realm. It is not money that money is evil, but the love (belief) it causes in men to value all things within its purview, even other men as purchasable slaves. This is the temporary power of mammon (valuation) to cause permanent, controllable insanity in “civilized” men.

I believe it is time for me to step away from this nonsensical movement and its pointless, fruitless debates and platforms, a propaganda machine in and of itself that promotes the waving of the national flag (and its law of the sea) of a district of pirates that has kidnapped and interned us all through birth registration and certification with the intent to cause escheat and steal all of our inheritable land. Yet we worship it as if it were a god, even above and totally against the Word in the Bible, the very essence and foundation of the common law. It’s design is to fictionally, “legally” corrupt our blood so that we may never be the prodigal sons we are bloodborn to be. We may never protect the lands of our ancestors, for no heirs are recognized by law, by blood, for no one is being born outside the trappings of the imposts of that national system and district. That which is artificial has no blood, thus he who is surety to some United States person (legal status) certainly has no blood right.

The United States is a horrific corporate machine where the “Made In America” symbol and flag is shamelessly placed upon slave-labor products made in its own federal prisons. Yet no one seems to mind or complain. It is a commercial black hole that promotes legal (artificial) liberty while in reality only offers a commercial franchise called a national citizen-ship that is denizened and so voluntarily incorporated in agency, barely one step above involuntary slavery.

I see no point in documenting the corruption of this strange society in its purposefully induced ignorant state any longer, for the crimes of its agencies and practitioners are never punished, only talked about and loosely recorded as “truth” in the buttcrack of some conspiracy website. The so-called “infowar” is just what its title exclaims it to be, a battle to put worthless, fictional information into each of our collective heads in a total abandonment of God’s Law and Nature. And yet nowhere in all of this supposed truth-telling (convincing us that black is indeed white and left is surely and legally right) are to be found the Laws of Nature, the moral and spiritual Laws that defeat the false powers and corruption of information and mammon, showing it to be merely the artful renditions of the tribe of the name (noun), as fictional persons (corporations), places (legal jurisdictions), and things (property). All of Nature has been re-named (nouns), and so all of Nature has been fictionalized and registered (taxed) by its name (information). The Infowar is not a charitable and loving action of men, but exists only as a for-profit corporation; an artificial person seeking gain by the spread of the useless information of the fictional designs of men. It’s talking heads cannot save you or I, for the only savior is each of our True Selves in our own actions (works) under the Natural Law, under the example of christ. And only the unattained True knowledge of what is the self-evident Truth of Nature both realized and uninterrupted by fictional concepts of the fruit of the tree of conceptual acknowledgement of good and evil will solve any fictional problem. There are only two issues, what is Real and what is artificial (art) posing as Reality. The solution is so simple it hurts, for it is merely to stop respecting art over the Reality it legally, artificially represents. In a nutshell, this is all the scriptures teach us, which is why the church doesn’t ever teach the Bible but instead its own doctrines that justify its corporate existence against the Bible.

I wrote about this strange time we live in, calling it The Great Disclosure, wherein corruption and greed are coming out of the closet and avoiding all consequences, thanks to the information fad. For knowledge of evil without action against it is acknowledgment of evil. Silence is consent. Inaction is the greatest of sins. The word sin (syn) means to be with anything. To be unopposed in our actions is to be in syn-thesis with it, to be in allowance and toleration of that evil thing. This is the state of the “union,” a common people standing with its government no matter what it does. A nation of syn (sin).

Along the way, as all this nonsense was rearing its ugly head for what it is, I began to study the words of this legalistic system of commerce, find words like redemption and being saved attributed to money, the god of nations in trust to mammon. I sought to find the True and Natural Law meaning of these words, knowing that no redemption or solution can ever be found through the emptiness of monetary inducements. And so I began in my first real effort to compile and decipher the words of King Jame’s purposefully misleading English (dog-Latin) translation of the Bible, witnessing how the legal language is a matrix code standing in substitution and artificial representation of the Bible code (Law). To this end, I compiled Cracking The Legal Code Of King James:

Hell – The name given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the king’s debtors were confined. Rich. Diet. (Black’s Law 4rth Edition) (Balentines Law, 3rd Edition)

–=–

What is citizenship if not an open air prison for debtors? Same system, different name. Wrap the American flag around it and you have yourself a party in hell for patriotic debt-slaves!

Let us be clear… this alternative media disclosure of information is not an awakening, and this religious notion that “truths” and “patriots” are woken up is pure nonsense. To wake up from the American dream (nightmare) is to fall hard back into Nature, into what is Reality. Political and monetary “knowledge” is false, and is not an awakening, especially when one still participates in that which he has supposedly woken up from. Don’t kid yourselves. This information war and disclosure without consequence is merely an admission of organized crime, of the lies of liars, where the criminals continue unabated despite such disclosure. Information awareness causes informed consent at best, complacency and apathy at the worst. And the best place for criminals (devils/attorneys) to operate is out in the open, where their deeds are seen, known, and accepted in the light.

Thus our “choice” for president is between two criminals that have outed each other as the liars and criminal element they are, pretending all that information is null once the fictional campaign reaches the primary. There is no choice, for a True choice would include “NONE OF THE ABOVE,” not merely a pick of two or more evils. And if you do not vote, you still have made a choice. Disclosure of information is certainly not a cure for the disease, and in fact it promotes the disease by promoting the perceived helplessness of those who absorb the lies and crimes without taking action. This “infowar” is not for the purposes of lawful prevention but of mass-programming, a manipulation of the publicly perceived normalcy-bias of we, the public-minded commoners towards acceptance of that openly organized crime syndicate, which is merely business (commerce) as usual. Even the devil pretends to be as the light, and uses the legal system and law to flatteringly title himself as such. In legal land, satan is God. Lies are truth. Dark is light. Slavery is freedom (franchise). Perpetual war is peace. Fear is happiness. The God of Nature is dead.

And the patriotic course is of course to seek remedy and solution from the very source and protection racket of that syndicate, the court system, by finding some imaginary trust and investment scheme we can all tap into. Money is the savior, a compensation for being tossed into this debtors hell. Perhaps its time to raise the “bar” a bit and stop seeking justice from corruption and salvation from artifice in mammon?

A quick browsing of the Infowars website reveals nothing of the spirit, nothing of the True knowledge, merely more fruit of the conceptual tree of good and evil. And the “fans” eat it up, for a scholar and even a half-way decent researcher could not help but to find eventually such informational “truth” to be mostly false, opinionated fear mongering designed to sell products specifically tailored to novel fear sales campaigns. At the website we find threats of impending doom via yet unrealized events such as “World War III” along side advertisements for survival products and guns. We spread the fear of nuclear weapons and the Fukushima radiation hoax if you are not trying to sell the besets, top quality, high performance, ultra purified, super-duper, fuck yeah iodine supplements at the same time? Fear and sex certainly sell, and Mr. Jones certainly ain’t too sexy for his shirt, having a face special ordered for radio. His Zionist ex-wife insists on what a “good actor” he really is though.

And so fear is all he can peddle while promoting what he used to preach against, his “info-babes” and graphic backdrops. Most new Infowariers (fans) never saw or choose not to remember when Jones reported over a decade ago on the info-babes of Fox News and other mainstream outlets, with their bodacious ta-ta’s hanging out while they reported the so-called “news.” Now he’s promoting it. They don’t remember or choose not to remember when Jones reported on the graphics and satanic studio mnemonics that were flashed all over the mainstream screen and logos. Today, Jones uses similar mnemonics as his background graphics. He promotes christian values along side free-market capitalism, as if money (mammon) and commerce was ever a value put forward by christ. He reports on the enemy (our government) while waving its national flag of nativity, never teaching the difference between territory (land in Nature) and nationality (fictional hell). The Infowars site continuously promotes idiotic protests at the Republican Convention, not for any reason but that they are easy prey, easily picked apart, guaranteed to produce usable media footage of rebels without an actual cause or clue, and easily instigated by Jones to cause a small riot.

But then, one must ask exactly what is the purpose of this self-titled “infowar” if not disclosure without consequence, considering that nothing has ever been changed or corrected that is reported there, that no prisoners have been taken, nor any battles won because of that non-vetted, Youtube created, totally illegitimate and outside of the custody-chain of legally accepted evidence and at best third-party “information” that is never going to be acceptable in any legitimate court of law. But it’s all apparently good enough for the fools who support that info clearing house, for those who are caught up in their own info-prison-planet paradigm.

And so we search and find at these information sites only feul for the fire of informational consumerism and manufactured consent, creating an “informed” audience that actually believes they can prepare for modern warfare and zombies with the same outdated weapons, guns, and ammunition that their own government unlawfully traffics openly to all of its third world enemies in foreign countries without fear of those now primitive weapons compared to the fourth and fifth generation warfare tactics and weapons of today. Might as well be sticks and stones, but the infowar sponsors will sell them to you for much more than they are worth! To be informed by Infowars is like being an expert in video games, having knowledge only of the foundations of fiction and virtual reality while having no ability to survive the winter without government subsidies and on-grid benefits. But the games are played on government owned and militarily occupied fields and municipalities, and only with governments permission.

And so, naturally, we find more paradoxical behavior there in Jones’ paradigm support of a presidential candidate that represents one of the completely private associations (artificial persons) called the “Republican Party,” despite the fact that Jones claims himself to be “Libertarian.” (I suggest doing a search for “libertarianism and satanism” and see what pops up as to who created that political ideology!) But wait a minute! What happened to the left-right paradigm, Alex? When did Infowarriers become part of the right against left fiction? Turns out paradoxes can exist after all!

And yet nowhere do we find the Truth about these presidential elections, which is that the common people Jones preaches his disinformation to do not even elect the president. Voting is not, after all, electing. Two different words there. Having covered this subject and how the electoral college elects the president so many times here on this blog, we find this particular Truth avoided so that the dramatic story of the “rigged election” process may unfold and be repeatedly told to sell more products to support the infowar, just as it is in mainstream news outlets; inducements for readers and subscribers to purchase more worthless “health” and “survival” products to support the infowar paradigm. Why would the very man who coined the phrase “left-right paradigm” support the right against the left, when we know its all the same team? Because both of these candidates are his bloodline, Clinton and Trump standing united in blood but divided for public show. How many times do you need to hear Ales Emetic Jones speak about his bloodline relationship to the “People” who founded this nation before you realize that Jones is on their side, and that their side is opposed to yours?

It’s the same old story, as every president including the “white person” renamed “Obama” of the white (Jewish) Dunham clan of landholders are proven to be of the same line. And the opposing candidate is always a cousin. It’s always a choice between family members.

I spent a whole year researching and collecting genealogical records, becoming an addiction towards the end, and discovering a hidden class that can only be compared to the movie “They Live” running the entire political, corporate, and religious show:

As many readers have difficulty comprehending the bloodline issue, though EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD is inherited by the heirs of the blood, here is my earlier compilation of research, with many links, along with an over 4 hour radio presentation on the subject accounting for months and months of research into the subject.

And of course, when we truly see beyond the vail of that left-right paradigm that the Infowar has apparently and conveniently forgotten about, we see that the Republican Party is merely the Democrat party in disguise…

But the Real Truth is that we are battling only ourselves like pawns on a chessboard, for we are participating in and respecting nothing but fictional events (the history of fictional persons, places, and things) on the Roman calendar. We romanticize everything until its actuality is indistinguishable from its embellishments, and we call it the truth. We lend credibility to such artifices as elections, in turn giving them a false sense of legitimacy (truth) as we lust after our own franchised stake within it. Yet we never seem to notice that there is no box to check NO. Choose is yes or no, not Trump or Clinton. But the illusion of choice is certainly baked into our brains by the infowar, making this causality of a certainty of two evils appear as if “the people” in common have spoken. And the billions spent in media and advertising keep up appearances though the modern feudal system never changes. It cannot change, for it is built (constituted) into the very law we foolishly and ignorantly respect. And the bloodline always wins every election, even as these latest of two cousins by the same grandmother pretend to compete with each other while promising their feudal tenants change we can be made to believe in. Of course in technology circles (i.e. artificial information), the word “change” comes from the word “delta,” which in the Brave New World model are the working class of slaves to the Alphas and Betas, not quite bright enough to see their designs and content in their institutionalized feudalistic form of happy slavery. OF course, only a slave votes for a master, and only he who has turned away from God seeks any such artful master.

The infowar’s greatest design is to cause all men to suffer each other’s collective inaction. It puts us all into our own form of artificial political party, with leaders more corrupt than those it exposes for profit. The group mentality, above all else, is pushed therein. And so as long as it appears that the group, the subscribers, the membership is waking up due to such a randomized oil spill of informational nothingness by the “truth party” leaders, individual action is thwarted, even as personal power is cowed by that prison of mental programming.

As to the only True power any man has, I decided to examine and re-write my own individual declaration of independence, with a comparison of current events and power structures that so far surpass the original that its authors would be ashamed to call us their sons and daughters. As long as we collectively toss our personal power into a group setting and then allow that group mentality to decide for us how our personal power should be utilized, we might as well admit that we are individually powerless and that our will or God’s shalt never be done. But its easier this way, right? Easier to just go with the flow, to grow with the seeds of corruption planted for us as our own garden (prison)?

For that theft of personal will and power is the Real power of political parties. Apparently “infowarriors” are “republicans” this time around, and the True nature of that political party paradigm be damned as they collectively support this current, prestigious representative of the bloodline despite the cognitive dissonance they must be feeling.

The harshest and most outward Truth is that most people in this war of information do not seek the Truth, for the Truth would actually set them free into Nature, taking them out of their security of legal franchise in personhood (legally granted and enforced “freedom” under dominion of the landlords), and the illusions preferred by such an information matrix as a virtual reality is much easier to accept than facing the Truth without such insurance and security of the church and state. For the Truth is only what is Real, what is of Nature, what is self-evident and self-existent, and therefore it is only what is not a fictional creation and invention of mans imagination. In this way, what we call as the agreed upon legal “truth” of information can be blamed for our own actions and inactions, allowing us to ignore our responsibilities to thwart such evil (artifice) and lies. And we get the added bonus of this imaginary enemy, the invented cause of all of our problems, as we pretend that we have no choice but to follow our leaders. We scream for a “voluntary society,” ignoring in an almost institutional way that all of our actions are in fact voluntary, and that participation in legal, contractual citizenship is certainly, under the doctrine of volunteerism (master and servant), a voluntary state of artificial being.

—=—

“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to agencies of government.”

—City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

—=—

As the song goes, “No one can take away your right to fight and to never surrender.” But ask any anarchist for their excuse for volunteering and following the legal law in personhood is because if they don’t they will be harmed somehow. Some even claim there is an imaginary gun to their head 24/7, that all services are provided by government with a gun forcing them to partake in it. But the Truth is that unless you are willing to die for what you believe in (love), unless you are willing to kill to protect your beliefs (loves), then you are just full of shit. Citizenship is a surrender of unalienability. It is a turning away from God and Natural Law. There is no excuse before the God of Nature or before a magistrate judge (legal god), for ignorance is no excuse to break any Law, including Nature’s. Pretending that we are not voluntarily participating in the adversarial evils of legalism doesn’t make it the Truth. You could fight, you could never surrender, but then your licenses and privileges (franchise freedom) might be taken away. It’s time to grow up and stop lying to ourselves that we are being forced. It’s a self-decieving lie built of fear and spiritual uncertainty and nothing more. No one can take away your right to fight and to never surrender. Fighting and surrendering are always voluntary acts. And no one is ever forced to be in public citizenship (voluntary servitude).

–=–

“So, we have all over today all kinds of cliques and clans and sects. We have anarchists and activists all fighting, really,over the same thing.All actually missing the point; missing the real point of the whole thing, being that, Truth makes peace; error makes law. If the individual understands the facts of his own faith correctly, he will discover the faiths of all others. But if he becomes merely a bigot of his own, and intolerant of all that he does not believe to be true, then when he attacks the other persons belief he is only attacking his own belief under a different name.”

—Manly P. Hall, from a recorded lecture on “Language: the Use, Misuse and Abuse of Words”

–=–

And so instead of unvolunteering we instead demonize that which we in fact continuously volunteer to support. We vote for our masters even as we call them criminals, which can only really mean that we get what we deserve. And if we do not vote, if we do not make a choice, and at the same time still volunteer to be subjects of government in citizenship, we still have made a choice, the choice of the actual electors in a rigged election. We go through these motions even as they call themselves as the worst criminals in their political, primetime debates. We allow them to steal from us because it is voluntary and legal according to their own legislated codes, through taxation and other forms of exaction and extortion. For while contracting and acting in U.S. and other national, commercial citizen-ships (vessels) is easily proved to be a voluntary commercial franchise (legal freedom), the law applied to said citizen-ship is not voluntary. For as the maxim (foundational principle) of law states, to know the law and to be bound under the law are the same thing in consideration of the agents (judges) and creators (magistrate gods) of law.

For instance, since the principles of law also state that ignorance of law is never an excuse, ignorance of this completely feudal part of the U.S. Code is no excuse for any man participating voluntarily. You better learn real quick that these are your rights when voluntarily acting in the person of the nation (district)!!!

–=–

42 U.S. Code § 1981 – Equal rights under the law

(a) Statement of equal rights

“All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.“

–=–

EXACTION:

“Torts. A willful wrong done by an officer, or by one who, under color of his office, takes more fee or pay for his services than what the law allows. Between extortion and exaction there is this difference; that in the former case (extortion) the officer extorts more than his due, when something is due to him; in the latter (exaction), he exacts what IS NOT HIS DUE, when there is nothing due to him.“

–Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, commissioned as an official dictionary of congress

–=–

Exaction (the worst kind of extortion) is your legal right, like it or not. It is an executively enforced right of personhood. And every citizenship shares that right equally. It is a requirement of every public citizenship. And though we complain fervently about such extortion as taxation and “fees” and “penalties” as exaction, we never seem to acknowledge the fact that the U.S. Code states clearly that it is our enforced and involuntary “RIGHT” to be exacted, taxed, put in pain, punished, exacted, etc. And we pretend that we have free speech as we complain, even when we are writing out our checks to the IRS and other agencies of government, fulfilling our right to be exacted from and giving agencies and their agents what is not their due, just as the kings and publicans (tax-collectors) of old. Rights are voluntarily accepted as mandatory in exchange for allegiance and submission to all other laws and the benefits and protections they afford. This is well established as a maxim and foundation of law. A right granted by any person, place, or thing (legal noun/name/title) is not a self-existent, self-evident God-given Right. It is not unalienable, but rather requires the lien of surety bondage of citizenship. It is contractual. And contracts are always voluntary, though their terms are restrictive and enforceable. The devil can only defeat a man of God with words, and citizenship is nothing more than a legally binding contract – a performance debt.

The Truth of Nature is now being customarily augmented just as much by Poki-mon monsters as it is with the lies of attorneys, politicians, and priests. And all media outlets are there to keep us interested, attached, and plugged-in to the information game. To pretend to be on the alternative or pretended truthful side of information is no different that being in on a lie. To pretend that alternative news is anything but information about confirmed and ratified lies called as legal truths is the first circle of hell. And to argue over what is good and sound money practices is the foundation of hell, a worshiping and respect of mammon and its artificial matrix of monetary valuation. For money can only be justified if slavery is justified, if everything in Nature is assigned a legal name or title, and the name is valued in mammon, taking away the True Freedom of all Life and Source, turing God’s Creation into a re-source of man. Only then is a valuation placed upon the priceless Nature of self-existence. And this is the harshest Truth of all. For one cannot Truly take sides in a “war” over information, for all information is merely coded and organized words, never actual Source. A war of words (information) will lead to nowhere, yet has the potentiality to cause men to destroy all Life so as to fulfill that war. Only then can the infowar be won, for there would be no beings left to distill and distribute such artificial things and words. The info would die with its source, mirroring the death and finally decayed madness of unspiritual men. Fiction may only destroy man if man allows fiction to rule his mind. Man may only destroy his own Nature if he continues to fall pray to this war of artificial information.

Perhaps the most painful Truth to finally comprehend is also the most obvious and ironic one. For there is a very good reason that the infowar stays only in the info (legal fiction) realm and never in the realm of action, a reason that is self-evident when the question of what is government finally becomes clear and is able to be considered by men bound to the Natural Law without vain patriotic accouterments in support of fictions and legalistic laws and licensure. The infowar stays out of the courts, out of the legal system, because a judges’ (legally entitled artificial person’s) first duty is to protect its principal employer, the very government it represents and holds its authority in flattering title from. In other words, no judge will rule against government or its members and sovereign magistrates or “People” because no judge can put the United States in harm’s way.

The judge protects the government from us, not us from government. No decision that would, for instance, cause rioting in the streets will ever be opinionated in any majority or precedent-setting ruling, unless that is the desired goal in order to cause more heavy-handed executive agencies and legislation. Organized crime will never rule against its own syndication, against the very incorporation that gives it its own false authority. If the nation wishes to have civil war, it will have it. All it needs to promulgate is the proper false information to its unwitting citizen-ships, the vessels of commerce that do not recognize their own voluntary enslavement and servitude.

And so obviously the events of 9/11 will not be pinned on government as an “inside job” by the very magistrate judges that corporation nation employs! Duh! How many countless hours do so many “truthers” expend delving into the actual events of September 11th, 2001, as if nothing else happened on that day? How much energy is put forward in exposing the information of that “event” without ever actually doing anything about it? How many criminal connections have been made to the very politicians in office at that time, and how many of them have been executed for treason or been placed in jail or banished? The infowar ensures that only information disclosure but never action takes place, as if we are sitting in an imaginary coliseum cheering for the sign from Caesar to punish or kill the gladiators. But Caesar is the District, and it will never give itself the accusatory thumb. It judges itself, for its judges are gods, and gods can only exist through nations.

I guarantee you that the end of this road towards the discovery or just what is Truth does not end with any .com,.info, or .org title, and especially not with a .gov disposition. When one finally sees only the Truth and knows it instinctually and as totally distinguishable from artifice, it is always recognizable and cannot be mis-taken for anything but It’s own Nature of self-evidence and self-existence. For it is Pure in its Nature. It is all aspects of True Existence; a Oneness that Exists despite man’s names, titles, numerals, or symbols used to fictionally define It. And it is only when the Real outweighs and crushes any artificial valuation and name (noun) placed upon it by man that one finally sees the Truth.

The only question that remains is how do we Live only in Truth, in only our spiritual Nature, without the pretended power of that artifice of informational nonsense?

As for myself, I remember fervently debating over the concept of “sound money” for many years. The word sound carries the meaning of stability, which money by design has and can have none of, except in its ultimately temporary life and valuation, which is always in Truth an absolute nothingness. Its value is only as sound as the sand running out of the hourglass, for like the hourglass, money is merely a design of man’s imagination. Money is nothing more than a belief system, a religious faith in it as a god (creator), not a self-evident Truth. It is a creation of man, not of God’s Nature and Source, and so it can never exist in self-evident Reality. What is money today may be fuel for a depressive or inflation fire tomorrow. Money of yesterday is used for wallpaper today, if it is not worshiped vainly as somehow more artificially valuable than its face once re-presented. Tomorrows money will be touted as the cure for todays monetary dis-ease, though like any pharmaceutical remedy it will only replace one dis-ease with another set of symptoms. And these new symptoms will be compounded as the new name of the same old dis-ease in that perpetually mind-numbing monopoly game of mammon. Money, you see, is also merely empty and falsified information. And that’s why, like the priests of all denominations of disinformation-spewing, legally incorporated churches, the Infowar corporation seeks money in everything it does. It’s an information exchange network. It sells lies told as truths in exchange for the biggest and most brilliant lie of all, that of monetary wealth.

What is sound is what everything should be built upon. A foundation. When a society’s foundation is built upon money, upon commerce, then it is built upon nothing of substance. It will crumble. It has to. For its foundation is temporary, as all things called as money are. Its reality will be informationally and technologically (artfully) augmented so that it appears more virtually appealing to its volunteerest, as modernized feudal subjects, appearing falsely to be more close to the Truth of the Reality of Nature than it ever can be. And like children in want of our slightly out-of-reach and dirty pacifier, we will feed on its murky artifice. We will take the artificial teat of government as our mother, a fictional, protective, artificial womb (matrix) that is as paper thin as the money it projects to insure us. When the root of all evil is our insurance policy, our foundation, our security, then our existence can only be as the minions of a debtor’s hell.

With all of that said, the reader of this will likely call me a hypocrite in my seeking the charitable contributions of those who are reading this. I accept that. I cannot deny that I am in such a terribly unavoidable disposition that my work cannot be printed in any Real aspect so as to protect it from being just digital, erasable information. I cannot deny that I am asking for money while exclaiming the less than virtuous nature of its artifice. I am fully aware of this dichotomy, and it pains me to no end.

However, I seek no gain from this request. I seek no fame or fortune. I don’t even seek money, except to pass it from your individual hands to the book-printers hands. This money is not for me, it is for the preservation of knowledge attained by one of you, one who actually did wake up from the information war and was able to explain it for future generations so that they do not fall for such fictional, satanic designs ever again, never falling pray to the fake infowar as our own egos have. I simply wish to print my books privately without publishing them, so that they can never be claimed as government property, and thus subsequently shelved or burned at 451 fahrenheit.

To this end, I have offered the first volume of this work for free, as I have done and will do with all of my work both past and in the future. Volume II is nearing completion, and will blow this first foundational work out of the water.

In celebration of my own journey, a path and learning curve that many reading this are also on or in the middle of, I offer the following video testimony of my own path in hopes that it will help you on yours.

Here I offer a walkthrough of my activist efforts that were caught on camera or microphone. These are fond memories of pointless rhetoric done to support the information war. They are personal reminders of how enslaved we really are, pretending to have free speech while being mildly tolerated by those that grant it only to themselves. Recognizing myself not as the hero but as the slave in these seemingly victorious encounters is that change of perspective that needs to happen with each of us.

—=—

“The American people don’t believe anything until they see it on television.”

–Richard M. Nixon, U.S. president

—=—

To start with, here is one of my latest interviews on Leak Project. I don’t often like to use video, but here is the tip of the iceberg of my latest work. And hey, it all must be true because its on truth TV, right?

—=—

When I first moved to the Salt Lake City area about seven years ago, after being an active member of We Are Change Los Angeles and thus leading me to a life of full-time research and activism, we formed and grew the Utah chapter of We Are Change, soon after holding a conference with Luke Rudkowski and many great (and as it turns out not so great) speakers. Live and learn…

—=—

One of those speakers, though all other footage and recordings were lost, was Professor Steven Jones:

–=–

And a photo opportunity at the end…

—=—

With support, this would have been a great event. And I would love to do this again after pulling this one off logistically without flaw. But with no support, it is now only a lost memory. Again, to imagine what I could do if not constrained by money… that is perhaps the worse feeling in the world.

Note: As embarrassing as it is to ask, if anyone has any footage from this conference please link it below in the comments or send me an email. This was the first of two different conferences with We Are Change Utah where the footage was magically “disappeared.” Thanks.

As a newby in the radio circuit, and because of the nature of the strange “beehive” culture in Utah, I could not then get the support by local radio or groups, and so the attendance was very low. I paid for this conference out of my own pocket, a debt that I though would be worth it because we had recorded the event. Unfortunately, the person that volunteered to come up from Texas to recored it worked as a host for GCN, and he either purposefully or accidentally lost all the footage. He did this after we had requested Alex Jones to support and host the conference, to which he refused. And so for my debt, for my efforts, I have jack shit to show for it accept the gratefulness of those few who attended. I am, to say the least, suspicious of what happened. And to make things worse, one of my trusted WAC members stole the little money we did bring in. But on a brighter note, this got me noticed by the local radio.

As the Tea Party movement was strong then (2010), and as Sheriff Mack was one of my speakers, the BBC came to interview myself and Mack for a documentary they were creating on the Tea Party movement. While Mack ended up making a fool of himself as he fell pray to the clever interviewer, thus making it into the final documentary as what can only be called as a portrayed imbecile and fool of the “patriot movement,” they didn’t quite know what to do with me and my answers. They couldn’t pin me to any side or party. I was an anomaly.

—=—

Needless to say, this interview didn’t make into the final cut of their twisted documentary, and BBC in no way supported our conference despite our giving it free reign to interview and film our guest speakers and make idiots of them. My conference and myself was not included or promoted. And so the BBC just used me to get an interview with some of my guests, pretending to support my efforts. Such douchebaggery.

After the conference, we arranged to have a good ol’ fashioned street action and bannering of the freeway with our 9/11 big blue banners, where we were visited by some local police that acted admirably in our support.

—=—

Around that time we had also delivered the official dossier of evidence of 9/11 to the Attorney General of Utah Mark Shurtlif, who gleefully has been behind bars until recently as a criminal for corruption charges, along with his counterpart, former Attorney General Mark Swallow. Of course the Bar Association controls all attorneys and judges, so why would we possibly hope such protected crime would break the syndicalist stranglehold?

This was perhaps my favorite filmed confrontation, the best of in-your-face-when-you-least-expect-it guerrilla journalism, where I simply asked what the Attorney General had done with that officially received evidence, and he talked his arrogant self right into a corner. What transpired was priceless… but yet again pointless. Gotta love this one though!

—=—

For the benefit of the less than happy Attorney General (head devilmaster), I will provide the U.S. Code here that deals with devils that do not turn evidence over to a judge…

–=–

18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not,as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State,is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

Guilty or not guilty? It ain’t your choice. It’s the private brotherhood of the Bar Association’s choice, and this man is its general!!!

Deal with it, subject!

To be fair, we did also arrange a legitimate sit-down interview where the Attorney could pretend to be lawful and legitimate and on the common people’s side, being the responsible activists we were:

—=—

But as for the “Tea Party Express,” a well-funded corporate sham, we attempted to participate and stand in unity with our supposedly celebrated “free speech” rights, while the fake Tea Party Express media heads shunned us and blocked our banners. You gotta see this to believe it. Exposing hypocrites was vastly becoming our community service and past time.

Of note here again, we see our sheriff’s officers acting with integrity and according to duty. Bravo!

—=—

The best part as always is the media spin at the end. Never was anything we did or protested reported on accurately or in context by the mainstream news outlets.

We Are Change made national news a few times here in Utah, but this one was certainly the best, most embarrassing, and most viewed. Unfortunately, the video of my own confrontation with congressman Chafetz on the CAFR issue is lost to the ether.

—=—

—=—

Of course, Chafetz had to rescind his comments made to us crazy conspiracy people once our little home video got loosed upon the national news.

—=—

Whenever we got the chance, we would hand out pamphlets and DVD’s or hold up our banners to cause irrational cognitive dissonance among the residents of this “beehive” state. Like the postman, activism happens rain or shine!

—=—

Sometimes, though rarely, it was not us doing the confronting but in fact our query calling out our own shortcomings. Here Lord Monckton agreed to sit with us after his presentation at, where else, Utah University, shedding a light on the reasons why We Are Change and other outlets of so-called “truth” were failing miserably in actually getting anything done about it in court (in government). His perspective changed my whole outlook. As a former investigative agent himself in Britain, he corrected me and changed my own course, turning my own perceptions to where the problem actually lies… the false teachings and doomed efforts of the Infowar! Here he schools me to my own embarrassment on such legal notions of the chain of custody and chain of evidence, none of which the “truth” movement ever follows, leaving our so-called “evidence” worthless and unusable, let alone undocumented and untraceable. This was my first perception into the false dichotomy of shock jocks like Alex Jones, who does triple the harm as he ever does good, causing masses of activists to act unprofessionally and not according to the law, and so that nothing we do counts as truly usable evidence.

The following is in four parts, and features me still in my own cone of ignorance trying to make a difference. I value these moments to show how much I have grown both spiritually and in reasonability. It is a reminder of how we all live under false impressions, impressions that are institutionally ingrained by both educative and entertainment-based fallacy.

—=—

—=—

—=—

—=—

Other activist outings revealed more hard-to-stomach Realities that manifested in unlikely places. While outreaching in the airport as part of a national protest to the then new irradiated full body-scanners, we found out the hard way that free speech is a lie, is “not absolute,” and that we needed legal permits to have even limited free speech. But most of all, this was my first realization, on camera, that these guys were powerless to stop my speech unless I had one of their permits for speech. In other words, no contract, no unreasonable legal code. Permission and license is the opposite of Natural freedom, as is legal person-hood.

But what I got this head of police to say was priceless…

—=—

—=—

A short time after that, I was handcuffed for no reason at the same airport by an over zealous police officer for attempting to say no to both the full body scanner and the body search. What transpired was a hell of a story, which I documented here:

For most of this time I had been mentoring with Walter Burien, who was teaching me about the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reporting system (CAFR) of all governments. Because I had quit my career as a sound engineer and designer to be an activist, I had the skills to help Walter make a documentary, and did so without pay. This was my first venture into documentary making, and my first time working charitably without expectation. And it felt wonderful!

Here is both the shorter trailer and the full movie:

—=—

—=—

From this effort, and from being able to spend so much time with Walter, I became a quick study and began my own film about everything I had learned and kept self-teaching. From this came “The Corporation Nation” series of documentaries, homemade in every way by yours truly. As I look back on this project, and as is shown in the first ten minutes of the movie, I really ended up making this because when I confronted the former Comptroller General of the United States about governments massive investment portfolio, as well as the incredible land and property holdings of the United States government collectively, he outright lied to my face over and over, even claiming that government was not a corporation! This pissed me off so much that it spawned whole The Corporation Nation series, all because of liars and the lies they tell.

—=—

In part two of The Corporation Nation I covered the pension system and its true purpose, showing government to hold mega-shares in just about all corporations around the world, the epitome of globalism having formed right under our noses. It took a four hour film to document this, with countless pictures used from the CAFR reports, showing officially that government not only owns shares in all corporations, but also votes as proxy shareholder voter for their boards of directors, for mergers and acquisitions, and other “corporate governance” issues. Talk about global empire and fascism!

—=—

When Jan Irvin started interviewing me as more and more radio shows wanted to hear what I had to say, I made this separate film to aid Jan in exposing his own school district, and in hopes that others might follow by utilizing the same information in their own local CAFRs. Besides these movies, I wrote dozens of blog articles detailing the CAFR swindle.

—=—

For those seeking an advanced lesson in the CAFR audit system, and to see how municipal cities, counties, and states are faking their bankruptcies, I wrote my first “book” on my blog, which I intend at some point to add to and print as well. That can be found here:

As I became more advanced in my own knowledge and comprehension of the sheer nightmarish corruption displayed in these publicly available but unknown and publicly unread CAFR reports, my local activism revealed the Sheriff of Salt Lake County (and most other county sheriffs around the nation) to be at the pinnacle of this infiltration of Agenda 21 and globalist, United Nations switchover.

Here I expose “The Sheriff Who Sold His County” by revealing the non-governmental associations and special districts that are set up to exact and extort more and more money, in our case from what was officially called a “police protection fee” charged ultimately, indirectly to the property tax, where if that fee was not then paid, the county could steal people homes and property to pay the “fee” that they swear is not actually a “tax.” Like a complicated puzzle with thousands of indistinguishable pieces, I spent months and finally figured out this scam, somehow piecing it together. Here I attempt to teach the locals what the hell just happened!

—=—

I had several encounters with this corrupt county sheriff, the prodigal son of a Utah bloodline with seven generations of politicians that have no qualifications but their family name, a local dairy farm family that has put more than one independent farmer out of business by its political hold over this county.

Also during this time I was appearing occasionally on our local AM radio station (K-TALK 630AM), going against the grain and causing a stir in the hive mind. The sheriff that sold his county was good enough to grace us with an interview, where his true colors shown through. I wished at the time that I had actually figured out the whole scam by then, but I had not. Unwittingly though, this public spectacle by the sheriff helped me immensely to finally understand the whole scheme. He’s a slimy bastard.

Other confrontations were unfortunately not filmed, including one with the chief financial officer (CFO) of the county (note that CFO is only ever a corporate title).

Intermittent videos were made, short attempts to bring perspective to folks who knew all was wrong but couldn’t see it clearly…

—=—

After seeing the movie “Inside Job” narrated by bloodline family member Matt Damon, who actually pretending to give a shit, I did my best to call him out to so as to publicly announce the actual truth about what happened in 2008-9 with the so-called economic crash. Naturally, he did nothing. Here I show from my films how government owned all the banks that profited, merged, and crashed through stock investment, and we see the same thing with oil companies and water companies. It is this disconnect by the public that knows not government’s stake-holding in these corporations that must be corrected, so that the complete conflict of interest of the regulators owning the companies they regulate can be comprehended. And you wonder why the shareholder (government) of oil companies doesn’t force them to clean up their spills? That would be bad for governments investment profits of course, and a corporations highest concern by law is to please and profit its shareholders!

—=—

—=—

After years of research and comprehension, I have accumulated many articles on this blog about the CAFR reporting system. A large collection of most of those “CAFR School” blogs are linked here, along with a few radio shows about it:

It cannot be stated here with any qualification how important this system of accounting for government corporations is. It is the holy grail of open secrets. It is a game-changer. It explains in full the corruption within government and the corporate world, two realms that are literally tied at the hip, and allows us to understand lobbying for what it really is. I have spent years trying to help others comprehend its structure, which is of course not meant to be understood by the public at all. Of all the links I have provided herein, this one is perhaps the most recommended, for it is a journey into all of my research on the subject of this hidden in plain sight government accounting scheme. And its rules and best practices are currently being implemented on a global scale within all nations.

What the common citizen-ship agent does not realize is that he lives in a company store. Just as companies like the East and West India and Virginia Companies funded by the king were the true founders of the so-called colonies (plantations) of early America, we subsist today in a singular commercial company called the Untied States district and commercial jurisdiction amongst the other company stores of the United Nations. Most of us work for some publicly traded and thus government owned corporation, manufacturing or otherwise producing its commercial products, and are paid in company script (U.S. currency) that allows no competition. We then spend that currency in any one of those government-held stock corporations, from grocery stores to gas stations, and in turn pay tribute (taxation) to the main company (district) and all its several franchise subsidiaries (legal state governments and agencies). This collaboration has become so obvious at this point that banks now simply collect property tax with our mortgage (dead pledge) payments. We live, work, and play in and on the persons, places, and things (patented nouns) of government. All of our property is its property, all the territory its land. We are the employees and tenants of a feudalistic company store, renamed as a commercial nation with “liberty” for all (in an open air debtor’s prison) designed to protect the pirates and private landholders (lords) that run it.

But, as we are not educated to recognize our place and status therein, it takes someone voluntarily removed from it like me over a decade to finally see this legal matrix code for what it is. And of course, this necessarily means that I am disenfranchised from every aspect of it I can be, for to see it one must have no interest in it. One can only see one’s false, legal id-entity when one destroys his ego and stops attempting to justify his legal, artificial character and existence. And perhaps the saddest part of all this is that I would not expect those receiving a pension from this monstrous company store, whose investments are in all the corporations and associations we complain about and which are the key to government holding stock and shareholder votes in those corporations, to give up their perceived “benefits” by being wed to such a devilish partner.

Samuel Johnson, in his rather curt and unabashedly honest dictionary of 1755, defined a pension as:

PENSION – An allowance made to any one without an equivalent. In England, it is generally understood to mean pay given to a state hireling for treason to his country. (Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1755)

–=–

But what truly is this allowance given to a group of the agents (employees and citizenships) of government that would betray their very own best interest and that of God’s Nature itself? What does government accomplish by this actuarial retirement scheme? What crimes does it get away with merely because it allows profit-sharing to its employees for foolishly allowing government to invest in the worst possible corporations throughout the world?

ALLOW – verb transitive – [Latin loco, to lay, set, place. See Lay.] 1. To grant, give or yield; as, to allow a servant his liberty; to allow a pension. 2. To admit; as, to allow the truth of a proposition; to allow a claim. 3. To admit; to own or acknowledge; as, to allow the right of the President to displace officers. 4. To approve, justify or sanction.Ye allow the deeds of your fathers. Luke 11:48. Romans 8:1. 5. To afford, or grant as a compensation; as, to allow a dollar a day for wages. 6. To abate or deduct; as, to allow a sum for tare or leakage. 7. To permit; to grant license to; as, to allow a son to be absent. (Webs1828)

–=–

The middle and above middle class public pensioner is always the loudest to cry foul at government handouts to the poorest and most destitute of people, claiming this action of actual charity to be equal to the robbing of the taxpayer money coffers. Imagine discovering that this is pure hypocrisy, and that most of them don’t even know it themselves! For it is actually the pensioner that lives in robbery of the taxpayer coffers, in a self-deluded ignorance, as I have shown through primary evidence. Turns out that infinitely more amounts of taxpayer money go to “match” government employee “contributions” or outright pay in total for these public pension funds. It is a massive suck of taxpayer money, so much that it is hardly believable, and thus pensioners are certainly in denial of their disposition. In fact, the whole point of hiring so many redundant government employees is to specifically extract taxpayer money for each hireling by placing them into governments pension fund system. The more employees, the more exaction can be taken from taxpayer funds in all local, municipal governments. It’s just part of the global corporate investment scheme.

I explain this fully below and showed it in my documentary, The Great Pension Fund Hoax, so that no doubt can possibly remain, only cognitive dissonance. Remember, I only seek the Truth, no matter how much it hurts. And the pensioner will defend his or her “stake” in this evil cabal of the company store to the bitter end, an unwitting trainer to the rest of us. But Truth is never defeated by purposeful ignorance. Pension funds are, more than any other source, responsible for the globalism we see today. And Samuel Johnson’s definition above certainly holds true today.

We are a society that has no natural predators to fear, and so we have taken to devouring ourselves and our vital habitat to further our exponentially pointless gains in order to keep this investment and corporate governance scheme and class structure of inequality going into perpetual madness… and likely into oblivion.

Here’s a perfect example, the Sand Wars. And something everyone should see:

A look at the CAFR for any government pension fund reveals the corporate power structure that pensioners make allowance for in order to gain from that ultimate nothingness of stocks valuations and other financially void instruments of corruption. This post shows by industry just one pension fund’s investment portfolio in the industries that are otherwise continuously demonized by their bad behavior and toxic events.

Doesn’t it piss you off to know that your retirement and taxpayer money is being invested in George Bush’s Carlyle Group to the tune of multiple billions in just one government pension fund scheme?!?

Sadly, Walter Burien of CAFR1.com and I are estranged at this point, and to this fact I wish to speak here without intent of slander or attack. As I progressed in my own self-teaching, reading CAFR after CAFR after corporate AFR (annual financial report) mixed with legal code and the history of this investment system set up so long ago, my questions started becoming more of a nuisance to Walter than mere simple and actually answerable inquiries. As I contemplated more and more the reason and design behind his strategy and “Tax Retirement Fund” system, I could never find the part where his “plan” would actually fix anything or cause corporate governance of corporations to change for the benefit of us common folks as he continuously proclaimed. For once, Walter didn’t have any answers, and so my questions became mistakenly taken as personal attacks upon his “plan,” and his responses steeped more and more in resentment, as if I was attacking his intentions and not trying to help get that system going. And yet one theme of our conversations never did change, which was the self-enrichment of Walter after so much suffering as head of his own business plan. Eventually, I could not merely overlook this obvious conflict of interest, especially when Walter was no longer able to answer my questions about his designs.

I campaigned tirelessly for years on behalf of Walter, attempting to get people out there to fund his efforts, but never my own. I never asked for funding, convincing myself that it would somehow come if I kept doing the right thing; that someone would step up and back up my efforts.

Pipe dreams… or so I thought.

Suddenly and out of nowhere, Walter messaged me that he had just received a $600,000 donation (and a future pledge totaling $1 million) from exactly the kind of undeservingly wealthy trust fund baby that I figured would one day somehow wake up and consciously realize he needs to support someone like myself and Walter. But I had not campaigned anything for myself, only for Walter, trusting in his integrity. I had faith in the man, something the Bible says never to put upon any man. And now I understand those words of wisdom intimately, after so many years of broken faith in so many people.

In fact, both Walter and especially myself saw through one of those false heroes of the truth movement, Dr. Ron Paul (a signer of birth certificates). I remember when I first started calling bullshit on the whole “End The Fed” movement and the Federal Reserve mythology how I was chastised and fallaciously attacked from all sides. For to take away anyones perceived enemy causes them to start looking inwardly for the Real problems, and that would mean facing the actual, self-evident Truth. And so as soon as I understood that the CAFR of the Federal Reserve was indeed the supposedly non-existent audit of the Fed, I felt obligated in honor to share that information with my fellow “truthers.” It was this effort more than anything, including the depredation of Ron Pauls false character and hero-status, that showed me the truth about the truth movement.

After posting the first of these only primarily sourced expose’s on Ron Paul and the Federal Reserve, all I received was personal attacks. My favorite of these was on Ron Paul’s website, where the top members and managers of that (Daily Paul) site debated not on the facts presented in my blog article, but on whether or not I had enough clout and a big enough audience to cause any stink. Screw the facts, was I a threat? I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. They were only interested in keeping up appearances and holding on to the Ron Paul money-mobile and charade. And for a while it indeed was a commercial cash cow for Paul and his supporters, complete with books, T-shirts, and other worthless swag.

And big surprise! Nothing came of it.

But why did nothing come of it?

Because it was all based on foundational lies!!! And yet I was the enemy for telling the truth about the false truths about the actual Fed. I continued to find myself in this position over the years, constantly fact-checking and calling out the lies and liars that were pushing them, either willfully or unwittingly as followers putting their faith in men, but never in the actual, provable facts. Patriots for profit, we call them.

Here are my research articles explaining the true nature of Ron Paul and the Fed, and how fans and followers of these false teachers are stuck in their own paradigm.

While Ron Paul had the perfect opportunity to expose the CAFR system as the already existing and only audit of the Fed, he chose his career as a congressman instead. We challenged and challenged him to expose the CAFR to his “fans” but to no avail, proving him (and many of his supporters) to be utter fraudsters.

As far as mine and Walter Burien’s relationship is concerned, and without gory or personal detail, but as well knowing that money equals power and that power always and absolutely corrupts and leads to greed and why I try my hardest to avoid it like the plague, our story and history together ended abruptly. Walter decided that he would not use that money to fulfill all his plans that I had worked so hard to learn and promote, but to purchase land and build a large business complex upon it’s potential success in Pueblo, New Mexico. In other words, he was going to give that entire financial donation to himself in the form of equity, just like the corrupt government does in its own financial trickery. I can only assume that greed took over, as it so often does. And because I never asked for anything from Walter as payment for working on his documentary or for supporting him out of my own pocket, nothing is exactly what I got from him. I campaigned and begged without dignity for someone to support this guy, and than here was the end of it, the fruit of our efforts, and then the greedy squashing of that finally realized pipe dream. With nothing left to do business or travel with, nothing ever became of all that money to my knowledge, and it was certainly never used for the purposes I believed it would be utilized for.

Just another heartbreak in a series of heartbreaks…

That was the last I spoke to him. I stopped supporting him. I stopped asking the tough questions. And the last post I saw from him was of course Walter asking for more donations some time last year.

Again, I do not wish to belittle Walters efforts at educating or most of his works and for helping to guide my own learning curve, most of which was really from my own efforts and research. I only want to show that like so many others that have crossed my path, money is always that which destroys them or steals their good intentions. Money is always what influences one, instead of helping, to harm others. Money is always what destroys relationships and induces divorce lawyers to cause women to become greedy monsters to the men they made vows to love and cherish. It always leads to evil, to adversarial purposes. It is why I ceased my show with “Freeman Burt” every week even as he continues to harm his clients by “helping” them, and as opposing proof is inversely why Daniel stayed with me to the end of my radio show in loyalty and brotherly love and intent every week. Money corrupts all things. Only Daniel and I seemed to remained free of it, which is a testimony all by itself.

To be clear, I am asking for donations the only morally viable way I know how to do so, without that corruptive element. Nothing displeases me more than being in this disposition, for I have learned to live without such legally purchased material pleasures made in foreign child-labor sweat shops and by U.S. prison labor hidden behind adorning celebrity faces pretending to give a shit about anything but their paycheck. I seek donations only to give it to another in exchange for printing my book. I am not selling anything, and never will, for commerce is that which is diametrically opposed to Love and Charity. I merely need the only object of exchange accepted by these brainwashed business people that have the equipment to print books in a private transaction, without barcodes and artful tracking marks, signs, and symbols. I haven’t any other choice that I am aware of. I will always give this work away for free to all who ask. And those who can will or will not support me here by donating what they can. What else can I possibly do? I don’t ask for your faith in me, only in my work and the verifiable and ancient knowledge presented within. All donations will go to that purpose alone.

As for my own journey, time progressed and I kept researching and learning…

As a cancer survivor at the age of 17, I spent a large part of my life seeking the causes of cancer and understanding why only in time do we have so many childhood illnesses that are considered as “early onset” adult diseases. What I found ultimately lead me to the only plausible prime suspect: vaccines. This was my first documentary on the history of vaccines, posted in September 2011, and which in hindsight is almost sophomoric compared to what I’ve learned since then. But that is the way of everyones unique path and the journey we choose to take. We must arrive in steps, and these are my larger steps in video, documentary form:

—=—

—=—

Early on in We Are Change we had been planning this documentary project, which I took over as the group started to become corrupt and tear apart, as so many of them do. Here is some early footage of vaccine victims we interviewed, which was not used.

—=—

I was also asked to speak to some folks in New York City about vaccines and the documentary, which was a nice visit to my former place of residence.

—=—

As time progressed,perhaps my greatest assembly of puzzle pieces was the Agenda 21 and Common Core plans and how they play out in globalism. Here is my lecture on the subject:

—=—

Somewhere along the way I documented my favorite charity, the only one I know that uses 100% of donations for charity! I have worked at this center every year for 4 years here in Utah when my mom and her church visits specifically to volunteer there. It is a charity worth supporting that does wonderful work.

—=—

My more recent public speaking engagement was in Philadelphia, where I was like a fish out of water, and it in fact caused me to expose most of the conference speakers as frauds. This didn’t go over very well, as Truth is not often what people want to hear. Imagine, freeing your mind at the Hilton! LOL!!

—=—

I have received gifts from people along the way, from books to home-made shoes, and these are of course the most precious of all to me. One unexpected gift was this one, where a reader placed my article into video format and dubbed his own voiceover to it. I regret that I made a mistake in this article, though it was one that does not actually have anything to do with the meat of its substance. I simply made an assumption that Sanger Institute was of the ilk of Margaret Sanger, and so I wrote her in mistakenly. But this should not take away from the actual information put forward, and I am so thankful for these types of efforts by good people. These types of mistakes teach us all how easily we can make false assumptions, and as researchers must verify all things.

This is “Archons And Mind Parasites And Extremophiles, Oh My!” and I know it took this guy a lot of time to put this together. So thank you so much for your efforts! What a voice!

—=—

—=—

Along the way, I even pretended to run for president, just to show that the common goyim people as subjects of the nation cannot be president of the nation, and to eventually expose the voting system as the fraud it is.

Though the website is history, the archive still exists. This is a very viable model that should be used. Though I don’t support Trump or his bloodline cousin Hillary, I will say that if Trump was smart he would follow this model and pick his entire staff before the election, so that people can see his “round table” of Cabinet heads and not just his silly hairdo. This is designed though as a “third party” platform. It is interesting to go back and read my individual platforms and compare them to what I know now. It is certainly healthy to view ones own ignorance recorded in the past to kill the ego of the present that will certainly reveal its own ignorance in the future…

Finally, though the years of radio before this are not included, here are my radio archives from Republic Broadcasting and everything in between and after, which will continue to be updated with any new shows I do. An extra special thanks to my friend Drew for keeping these archives on my behalf. Again, some gifts just can’t be monetized.

5 days a week for two years I labored without pay to bring these shows to life while at the same time researching and writing my current book series. It was a hell of a ride, full of trolls and saints, with some really good interviews and a documented timeline of my own journey, much of which led to my books.

I did so many shows before this, but they are not organized in any way, floating instead randomly out in the digital wasteland of youtube videos and mp3’s.

Perhaps each of these shows, most of them two hours, are worth a penny each? That’s $5 of thanks that could be gifted towards the printing of my book. But then a Mocha Frappacino with artificial flavoring from the local Starbuck’s drive-through might be worth that $5 so as to cause a chemical reaction in your brain, so that you might forget those hundreds of hours of research and rhetoric and walk around in a frap-induced stupor. I understand… We all have our priorities.

My work has been shared and plagiarized by many outlets, including the Prison Planet/Infowars sites and others. Some offer credit, and some do not. Some use a link only without actually naming my site or name. It’s an interesting matrix we have built.

Some of my movies, with my permission and blessing, are also available not-for-profit at the dollar DVD project (http://onedollardvdproject.com) to which I see no income from, but again with my blessing and support. These include Lethal Injection, The Corporation Nation, and The Great Pension Fund Hoax.

And so here I am, at the end of this winding path through so much disinformation and psychological warfare. And of course so much happened in between when the cameras weren’t rolling.

I am well into Volume II of my book series, and will be releasing it as soon as I can get it done and edited, adding it to the current free pdf available at StrawmanStory.info. The only question I have in nervous anticipation is will I be able to print it so as to make it permanent?

That’s up to you.

If you found any value in any of my above presented works, which represent literally my life for the last 10 years plus, then I am asking you without pride to make a donation today so that I may immortalize my journey’s end, by printing my books into a solid and preservable form immune from the controllers of this internet matrix. My path from here depends on you. Again, if you wish to have a copy of the book, I am asking a gift of $30 to cover printing and shipping, leaving me enough to hopefully print Volume II without such future groveling for funding. This will be my last effort in this regard, though I will keep writing and releasing for free my books that may or may not be printed.

Thank you for all who have donated so far, going way beyond, and for all your love and support. I have one last surprise I hope to pull off, a way to realize what I have been working towards. Should be a hoot if I can get it going. You’ll know when it happens, if it happens.

Until then, any radio shows I do will be posted at the archives. My other websites are:

To the followers of this blog, thank you for reading and subscribing and for all your comments and help over the years. My future books and perhaps a documentary or two are essentially replacing and will be linked to and announced on this blog, because quite frankly, at this point soundbites and clever stories and confrontations just can’t cut through such complete and evil designs. The parts never reveal the whole, especially when the parts are never presented as a whole. Debating the finer points of so many lies and fictions just doesn’t cut it for me anymore. I seek a higher path, a higher spiritual knowledge, and I hope we may meet someday on that path.

Until then… try to keep it Real, my friends. For the greatest and only True knowledge is the distinction and purposeful consciousness of what is self-evidently Real and what is fiction. And the strangest knowledge of all is that only artificial persons, places, and things need to be proven to fictionally exist, for these are not self-evident. Understand that, and no agent of that legal matrix of word magic can touch you.

Now, let’s see… what was all that stuff worth?

If the answer is nothing, then hey, it’s my fictional person’s “birth” day on August 8th, the day my vital statistics were civilly certified and registered! How about sending me a little something to support this happy artificial creation of a legal entity day, my joyous day of nativity as an emergence into this fictional realm of legal matrix day? Send a few words to wish me a happy bondservant day, congratulating me on my pretended, legalistic corporate birth as a “natural” legal person! Send a card to me as agent for service of process at my legally registered federal address, though I don’t think Hallmark (a government owned and traded corporation) makes a greeting card for being subject under Caesar’s district, not even a sympathy card.

Anyway, at least send me your greetings and salutations, and may your own artificial life be commercially fruitful in this open-air debtor’s prison on the upper levels hell.

My main, reliable email will be:

clint@strawmanstory.info

And by the way, just so you know, it is not that we are losing our democracy to tyranny, it is that democracy only ever leads to tyranny. Tyranny is the red-headed step-child of democracy. It is the fifth and final regime of every civilization as Plato predicated. Tyranny is voted in by the democratically poisoned society. Democracy is a warning that the end is near, and should not be celebrated as a good thing. Confused? It’s a chapter of my book, which I read live on the radio, here:

Finally, I have found this last piece of wisdom to share. Seek the intent of the words of the Bible. I guarantee it is the end of all quests for Reality and Truth. To seek the Bible is not to seek religion, but instead the Natural Law. No good researcher can possibly avoid it, though they can certainly demonize it and pretend it doesn’t apply to them. But I assure you it is the cornerstone of everything. It offers the only way out of this legal hell, for it is the foundation of self-government, self-Law, not just empty religion. My books go over all this with a fine-tooth comb. The Bible teaches you only how to be your True Self again, and thus to treat all men only as their True Self, never respecting reputation, titles, names, marks, and signs. To look upon all only by its source, and all men as we were all born into Nature. The Bible, again, is not religion. Rather, it is a guide-stone on how to religiously follow the Law that is causes a sanctuary from all of man’s false legal inventions. Some people drink coffee religiously, and some watch television sitcoms religiously every week. The difference between a being a member of some corporate religion (artificial person) and actually acting religiously (verb) according to the Law of Nature (God) is the difference between darkness and light, between ignorance and knowledge, and between fiction and reality.

What law are we under? The law of mammon. For the legal law always tells us the opposite of the Bible. The Bible says to respect only men, never their persons, while the legal law respects only persons, not men. A person in law may only deal with other persons, while a man of God (of Nature) may only deal with God’s Creatures. Think about this next time your government is trying to push transgender bathrooms and gender neutral status on your person. For person is the same word as status. In the fiction of legality, we are forced to respect the status of the man’s person, which has no place or existence in Nature. There are no words, no names in Reality, and the Laws of Nature will never actually be altered, except in make-believe and under false name and title (persona).

I have found every reasonable question I may ask to be answered in scripture. It is not what you have been told.