Choice 1.
The actual text of the resolution is as follows. Please note
that this does not include supporting or opposing arguments
or rationales. These may be found on the debian-vote mailing
list archives.

Change section 5.2 of the constitution concerning appointment of
the Project Leader to reduce the nomination period to a week,
and the voting period to two weeks. In wdiff format:

5.2. Appointment

The Project Leader is elected by the Developers.

The election begins
ninesix weeks
before the leadershippost becomes vacant, or (if it is too
late already) immediately.

For the
following three weeksfirst week
any Developer may nominate themselves as a candidate Project
Leader.Leader, and summarise their plans for their term.

For three weeks after that no more candidates may be nominated;
candidates should use this time for campaigning
(to make their identities
and
positions known).discussion.
If there are no candidates at the end of the nomination period then the
nomination period is extended for
three further weeks,an additional week,
repeatedly if necessary.

The next
threetwo
weeks are the polling period during which Developers may
cast their votes. Votes in leadership elections are kept
secret, even after the election is finished.

The options on the ballot will be those candidates who have
nominated themselves and have not yet withdrawn, plus None Of The
Above. If None Of The Above wins the election then the election
procedure is repeated, many times if necessary.

The decision will be made using the method specified in section
A.6 of the Standard Resolution Procedure. The quorum is the same
as for a General Resolution (4.2) and the default option is None
Of The Above.

Quorum

For this GR, as always
statistics
shall be gathered about ballots received and acknowledgements
sent periodically during the voting period. Additionally, the
list of
voters
would be made publicly available. Also, the
tally sheet
may also be viewed after to voting is done (Note that
while the vote is in progress it is a dummy tally sheet).

Looking at row 2, column 1, Choice 2: As above, but do not change election start date in section 5.2.2
received 82 votes over Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election process

Looking at row 1, column 2, Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election process
received 129 votes over Choice 2: As above, but do not change election start date in section 5.2.2.

Pair-wise defeats

Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 129 - 82) = 47 votes.

Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 196 - 29) = 167 votes.

Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 159 - 51) = 108 votes.

The Schwartz Set contains

Option 1 Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election process

The winners

Option 1 Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election process

Debian uses the Condorcet method for voting.
Simplistically, plain Condorcets method
can be stated like so : Consider all possible two-way races between candidates.
The Condorcet winner, if there is one, is the one
candidate who can beat each other candidate in a two-way
race with that candidate.
The problem is that in complex elections, there may well
be a circular relationship in which A beats B, B beats C,
and C beats A. Most of the variations on Condorcet use
various means of resolving the tie. See
Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping
for details. Debian's variation is spelled out in the
constitution,
specifically, A.6.