Primary Navigation

* * * "A Taste For Blood" * * *

A Taste For Blood By Ron Branson National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief Well said is the truth that Truth is Eternal. It is written, And ye shall know the

Message 1 of 1
, Aug 10 6:00 PM

0 Attachment

A
Taste For BloodBy Ron BransonNational J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief

Well said is the truth that Truth is
Eternal. It is written, "And ye shall know the truth, and the
truth shall make you free." John 8:32. A couple years ago, as
a result of the many truthful articles published, an attempt
was made to eradicate JAIL4Judges' from the internet word.
J.A.I.L's computer was hacked into through some very high-tech
work, and years of work was eradicated from the J.A.I.L.
computer. Even our technician located in Las Vegas, Nevada,
stated prior to this incident, that he had never seen such a
massive work done on a home computer system with thousands of
files on most every subject. What happened was that every work
that had anything to do with judicial accountability was
deleted, the password changed, locking me out. I had to have
the computer counter-hack into it to gain access. I even found
J.A.I.L.'s external terabyte back up system that was
professionally set up to automatically save everything three
times every week, had nothing on it whatsoever. It was totally
blank. Every email address had been erased, causing me to have
to reconstruct an address book from those who wrote J.A.I.L.
Obviously, someone out there really finds JAIL4Judges a
threat.

I decided to enter my own name in an internet to search and
see what could be found out there. In that search, what had
become apparent is that truths spoken many years ago are just
as pertinent today as when the truth was first spoken. An
example is an article written over ten year ago on June 29,
2002, namely, "At Taste For Blood" which was found on
someone's website.

June 29, 2002 —
Everyone knows the difference between the family dog and a fox.
From a farmer's perspective, foxes are known for raiding the
chicken house and killing the chickens, and thus must be killed,
while the family watchdog is supposed to guard the chicken
house.

Once in a while, it becomes the family dog that
kills the chicken, and having tasted the blood, they develop a
taste for another. After all, killing a chicken is easy, and the
benefit great, as he is rewarded with a fresh warm meal for the
killing.

This, of course, places the farmer in a
predicament of having to kill the family dog, for what is the
difference between a fox killing the chickens or the dog killing
the chickens? The result is the same — dead chickens. In such
cases, however, the family dog is more of a threat than a fox at
large.

To make the analogy, governments were
instituted among men to protect their God-given right to own
property. But, just as with the watchdog above, our Founding
Fathers were fearful of the government eventually becoming the
very threat to property ownership that it was instituted to
protect. They set forth in the Constitution, "No person shall...be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law..."
Fifth Amendment.

To safeguard this constitutional guarantee of
protected property rights, they instituted the judiciary as a
watchdog to call the government to account when the government
fox transgresses upon the sanctity of property rights.

John Adams, in recognizing the sanctity of
property ownership, said,

"The moment the idea is admitted into society
that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there
is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy
and tyranny commence."

Now imagine for a moment if both the judicial
watchdog and the government foxes developed the same taste for
blood in plundering and pillaging people's property for their
common benefit. After all, the kill is easy, and the reward is
great, for they can acquire property costing 30 years of labor
with just the stroke of a pen, leaving the people destitute and
floundering from their death-blow.

Once the government acquires a taste for
confiscated property without the interference of the judiciary,
then — hey, go for it! One property, two properties, ten
properties, five hundred properties, etc., etc. They develop an
addiction for stealing properties at little to no cost to
themselves.

While a common thief may steal contents from a
house, it is the government that steals the entire house. Bovard
said,

"While many people are terrified of private
crime, they have neglected to notice how government actions cost
them far more than private criminals...The Justice Department
estimated that total losses from the 7,885 bank robberies
nationwide in 1994 was approximately $28 million. The same year,
federal prosecutors confiscated $2.1 billion in property...that
year."

Such findings lend credibility to the statement
that if we seek to reduce crime in America, we must reduce the
size of government. At least our right to own property would be
much less at risk!

Having thus said, it will only be through the
passage of J.A.I.L in this
country that will curb the watchdog's insatiable taste for the
blood of your private property.