Between the pulling of Grand Theft Auto V from Target Australia and the increasing number of women who want to be treated like humans, men are under attack like never before.

A widely-read article by Milo Yiannopoulos, published at Breitbart, recently decried the excruciating oppression facing men, who, with the advent of women’s right to work and vote, are no longer able to use “girls” to solve their problems. A travesty of the highest sort. The author quotes one man:

“[it] wouldn’t be so bad if we could at least dull the pain with girls. But we’re treated like paedophiles and potential rapists just for showing interest”

These men claim they are earning less money, have less retirement funds and now, have to deal with “girls” who expect to be treated with respect. It’s unthinkable, really.

These men cannot even shop safely at Target anymore, knowing their right to prostitute and murder women within their gaming world is being scrutinized. What’s next? Equal pay? This madness has to stop.

Yiannopoulos informs us that women, surely, are the driving force behind decreasing social mobility, political disillusionment, and the fragmentation of the liberal democratic system. Presumably women’s rights are also to blame for the melting of the polar ice caps and the declining number of wild bees.

Apparently if women had never started with this “right to vote” bullshit, none of this would have happened.

Someone please write more about these poor men sufferingCredit: Breitbart

The author has surely confused “feminism” with rampant capitalism, advanced globalization and the dearth of state governance. Undeterred by his errors, the author presents his case for why men are the real victims of the systems they created in order to maintain their own supremacy.

I agree with him on one thing: the pale male purveyors of globalized capitalism have shat in their own nests. But it’s not because of women that the systems underpinning capitalism are crumbling from the inside out.

The global economic system and its political counterparts are in a crisis of their own making. Women rallying to end rape have very little to do with this.

Yet according to Yiannopoulos, they do. Those pesky anti-rape seminars at American colleges are ruining men’s willingness to rape and with it their entire lives and the social fabric of society. Ironic then that he accuses women of hysteria…

The idea that rape is a central feature of the broader economic system is actually an important one. Yet the author fails to engage with this in any meaningful way (obviously).

If we consider that rape in marriage was legal up until recent decades in most OECD countries, or that rape is a necessary product of the global sex trade, or that rape is a systemic tool in war, or that rape convictions are near enough to nil in most countries, then it should be clear that ending rape would require a massive shift in global relations.

Ending rape, then, requires a radical revisioning of the systems that govern society and an acknowledgement of women as co-creators.

The idea that women may no longer be passive recipients of male-centric political, legal and economic systems is likely to unsettle those men who pin their egocentric notions of self-worth on traditional power relations over women.

Men who’ve sat at the pinnacle of such power relations may be disillusioned by the growing complexity and diversity around them. Perhaps they are asking “Why are black people in my workplace?”… “How could this woman be my manager and why can’t I force her into sex?” Apparently, some men have found themselves directly confronted by the notion that men should not rape. In fact, the author goes to the extent of calling new anti-rape law “unworkable, prudish and downright misandrist.”

Unsurprisingly, Yiannopoulos fails to provide any actual data to back up his woman-hating rhetoric. First person narrative from his bros who can’t be bothered with “chicks” anymore is enough to justify his hysterical claims that the world falling to pieces because “rape law.”

As luck would have it, this freshly-laid pile of anecdotal excrement is well-received by thousands of readers, none of whom seem to notice the stark lack of substantive evidence.

This stands in contrast to any article ever written on women’s rights, which is immediately torn apart by commenter-turned-statisticians who question the limitations of methodology, the lack of strength in p-values and repeat the only thing they remember from the research methods course they took in first year — “correlation is not causation.” Strangely, few seem to care for empiricism when it is women’s rights under fire.

We live in a society so accustomed to misogyny that the slightest move in favour of women’s human rights is misinterpreted as female supremacy. If precedent is anything to go by, these new misandry-laden rape laws will still see only a very small percentage of rapists ever being charged — hardly female supremacy at work. And the removal of GTA from a few retailers does not actually censor the world of depraved gaming, it merely sends a message about social responsibility.

The fact is that sex crimes against women are on the rise in many countries, self-harm, suicide and eating disorders in girls are burgeoning, and sex trafficking of the vulnerable is a booming business. Young women are under more sexual coercive pressure from men than ever before. There is no male ‘sexodus’ and in fact research suggests quite the opposite. The idea that men are now somehow suffering because rape laws make them feel rejected is surely hysteria at its peak.

Next week Breitbart has a special follow up ‘why women are the biggest victims of women’s rights’ – I can hardly wait.

What’s even more disconcerting is that the “Mens’ Rights Movement” has made its way to India (where they even hold conferences). Its a joke when you consider how utterly pampered and spoiled boys grow up here in comparison to their sisters.

Indian MRAs main issue is combating wives who do not want to live with their husband’s parents in the joint family house where she becomes the family’s default house servant.

They’ve formed a “mens’ rights” org around this issue, believe it or not.

MRAs in INDIA? Where female fetuses are aborted and female babies murdered because of their sex? Are they effing insane?! India is considered a patriarchal dystopia in the West (well, by me, anyways) what with the epidemic rape and femicide all, and those clowns are campaigning for MEN’s rights?! It would be quite a funny joke indeed, if they didn’t mean it seriously.

I’ve read the articles on the Sexodus, MGTOW, “New wave Mens Rights”, etc. and I’m a little confused. The question which comes to mind is: Why are you attacking this movement? Obviously beta males who were never any threat to women are the ones engaged in this “Sexodus”. They’re at home plaing video games and doing drugs, and generally not bothering anyone. They certainly aren’t oppresing women, feminist or non-feminist. The alpha males who are oppresing women aren’t going to be participating in this so they wont be reading or participating in it, so there goes that demographic. Women can’t be your target audience, so just who are you trying to drive your point across to and why? I’m probably misguided here, but logically, I would think all women would applaud this type of movement. Biology dictates females of all species look for traits that make males either desirable or undesirable for potential mates or whatever. Here you have males that are giving up on women, making them undesirable, and removing themselves out of circulation completely. It doesnt really matter about who is left, we aren’t talking about them. You mentioned how the original article didn’t quote any sources or factual studies. I’d have to concur with that. But in the same breath I’d also have to state that that too, doesnt matter. If this “Sexodus” it true in any part, then it is happening regardless of why. So again, why the critical commentary?

An old article but somehow i still stumbled upon it. And the criticism is missing the point of the Sexodus article entirely.

The point is that pursuing relationships with women is not worth it and way too risky in our current society. When it comes to rape we are guilty until proven innocent, sa an accusation alone is enough to ruin someone. When it comes to divorce then it is likely to destroy our lives, since the woman must still be taken care of.
We are at a point where men face the pressure of old stereotypes (man is the one to make money) and new stereotypes (men are the source of violence and rape culture).

So i ask you, why would i care about women in a romantic way? Why wouldn’t i instead focus my energy on my work and hobbies?