He Who Lives by the Sword…

As far as gender relations are concerned, not much has changed since the stone age. He who lives by the sword dies by it. Men fight like animals for female attention, and women oversee the mating game. It is treacherous, but that is how things have worked since before we were monkeys. This sort of competition gives women plausible deniability so they can ignore their part in this game. Men are just ruthless animals who want sex and violence. Women are innocent angels who only want love. This is also the current narrative told by the media. “Alpha males” who engage in childish acts of violence only further this narrative. Men like Bobby Knight act as poster children for the “toxic masculinity” that supposedly infects our culture. Although it is tempting to defend Bobby Knight, we need to resist the urge to complain about feminists and political correctness. Bobby Knight’s antics encourage the flawed narrative that allows feminists and tradcons to take away male rights.

Bobby Knight was taken down because of his inability to control his temper. His fiery demeanor helped him to motivate the student athletes. His knowledge of basketball helped him to build new strategies. Let’s not get things confused, Bobby Knight was fired because he choked a student. No school wants violence against its students. Perhaps, in simpler times, society was more tolerant of violence, but Indiana University was justified in firing him. Let’s not turn him into the next Jesus Christ.

Men need to stand against violence against men. Few men engage in violence, but apparently “masculine” men are ones that are more violent. By allowing violent men to be symbols of manhood, we are not only encouraging feminists to attack men(who supposedly deserve it), but we are also encouraging boys to model themselves after Bobby Knight. Can’t we idolize computer scientists like Donald Knuth and Alan Turing rather than alpha males like Bobby Knight? Aren’t we scraping the bottom of the barrel by adding Bobby Knight to the list of MGTOW heroes?

Men who voluntarily assume the role of the violent monkey are setting us back. They cheapen violence. Some men get into fights over sports games, traffic, card games, and pretty much everything else. Is it any wonder women want to control them? Is it any wonder that women want personal attack dogs that they can sic on anyone they dislike? Senseless male on male violence reinforces the belief that men are violent animals, and it allows women to wash their hands of problems they created and blame it on male nature.

Bobby Knight’s violent nature makes him an unsuitable role model for MGTOW men. He had many admirable qualities: he was a brilliant strategist, he held his students to high academic standards, and he was good at motivating his players. However, Coach Bobby Knight was a violent man, and he was fired because of this quality. MGTOW should focus on minimizing male on male violence because it cheapens violence itself as well as the suffering that results. In the article I’m responding to, the author specifically mentions scientific discoveries (like electricity). Scientific discoveries are not made by throwing chairs and screaming about game faces, but by years of quiet thought and experimentation. As mankind gets accustomed to the twenty-first century, I hope that men will learn to see themselves as fully conscious and self-aware humans who do not need to engage in violence. I want men to see themselves as human.

No, my point is that MGTOW should not shed tears when violent men have to pay for the consequences of their actions. Raising them up as martyrs of masculinity implies that their actions were justified.

There are instances where violence is justified(police, just wars, etc), but I don’t see how Bobby Knight’s actions were justified.

I’m actually shocked that more men don’t snap and go on killing sprees. I’m no stranger to false accusations by women and can tell you that it took every ounce of my self-control not to murder a couple of them. When you consider the horrors men go through in relationships with women, it’s shocking how much self-control men do display. Now that women have the VAWA and Yes Means Yes, allowing women to destroy men’s lives on a whim, both marriage and cohabitation will see further declines.

Most women don’t hit men. Why? They don’t have to. They can instead destroy you with divorce and/or false accusations. This allows them to use other men to physically abuse you, rather than muss their hair or damage their nails. Pretty cunning, aye?

Why do so many teachers go after young boys? Because the young boys are smaller and far more naive than mature men. Ever see girls fight one another? The only reason more women don’t beat men is because most men are bigger and/or stronger than most women (thanks testosterone). The women that do hit men know that all they have to do is shed a few crocodile tears and she’ll be let off. Besides, even if she does go to court, she’ll just get probation, a suspended sentence and a slap on the wrist.

Female teachers mistreat boys because they can get away with it.
Women falsely accuse men of rape because they can get away with it.

Why can they get away with it?
Because the men who enforce this shit see all men, themselves included,
as worthless animals. They assume that any man would rape, given the
opportunity. They assume that all men would kill each other, given
the opportunity.

Men do exercise much more self control than the media gives them credit
for. Violence is at an all time low, and the media still complains
about “toxic masculinity.” The media focuses on the men beating their
chests, and it says

“See these men, all men are like this. All men are violent. Men
are primitive animals. Don’t trust men.”

I don’t think that Bobby Knight is a good example because he had
less self control than many men. You mentioned that you had
false rape accusations against you, but you had the foresight
to avoid violence.

False rape accusations are a form of proxy violence. They allow
women to attack men without getting their hands dirty. The male
victims of this violence are justified in their anger. I just hope
that they can express it without getting themselves into trouble.

Well, I personally hope that falsely accused men GO ON A MASSIVE KILLING SPREE! If the woman that falsely accused me had won, I would have killed as many women as necessary to assuage my anger. REDRUM! I would have killed each and every member of her family as well!

I wasn’t falsely accused of rape. A girl that I dumped faked an attempt at suicide. She faked the attempt with my gun – which she secretly removed from my apartment. I talked the gun out of her hand, in person, by telling her whatever she wanted to hear (I lied to her to stop her from killing herself). After the fact, she decided, that since I wasn’t being genuine in talking her out of suicide, that meant that I should go to prison with a false accusation; hence the false assault charge. The wrath of a woman scorned means that it’s OK that men’s lives be destroyed – so long as the ego of women remain intact. To women – this is equality.

Experience has given me a much, much deeper understanding of human nature. That a seemingly random male pops unexpectedly and goes about shooting people makes perfect sense to me.

Globally, women’s suicide rate keeps going up and women’s life expectancy keeps going down. Why? More women in the military and women having to support their families (work stressful jobs). This may seem sad to many. To me, it seems like poetic justice. I’ve a grin on my face. I’m bursting with joy.

as a follower, I am eauncroged by this post. First, knowing that the leaders at our church prepare for a good wake. Second, that even tho’ I am a stay at home wife, no kids, there are things that even I need to do to be effective in the wake I leave behind my path.