Wednesday, September 2, 2009

The British papers have been on a tear recently exposing the fundamental flaws in their socialized health care system.

Today The Times of London exposes the out-of-control cost of the British system. Rather than controlling costs, as is promised by American supporters of a "one-plan, one nation" single payer system, the British have created a bureaucratic monster:

It was always going to be expensive to create a healthcare system for all that was free at the point of service, but not even the NHS founding fathers could have realised what an economic colossus it would eventually become.

In 1948 the service had a budget of £437million, about £9billion today. Each year since, this figure has climbed by more than the rate of inflation, last year the budget topping £100billion — more than £1,500 for every man, woman and child in the country. Sixty per cent of this goes on staff and 20 per cent on drugs.

The NHS, with its 1.5million employees, has become the largest employer in the world after Wal-Mart, Indian Railways and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army....

Accounting for, roughly, 18 per cent of all government spending, the NHS is enormous, expensive — and still growing.

The costs have grown so rapidly that massive layoffs of health care workers are likely, and elimination of some surgical procedures, such as tonsillectomies, are under consideration, according to another article in The Times:

The NHS may need to cut its workforce by about 10 per cent — the equivalent of 137,000 staff — to help to meet planned savings of £20 billion, according to a leaked Department of Health report.

A study commissioned from the consultancy firm McKinsey and Company recommends cutting clinical staff posts as well as administrators to meet efficiency savings by 2014, suggesting a knock-on effect to patient care....

The report also said that if four million of the 29 million outpatient appointments each year could be cut, it would save £600 million.

A further £700 million could be saved if procedures with limited clinical benefits — such as tonsillectomies, varicose vein removal and some hysterectomies — were no longer performed.

The British system is the dream come true of American liberals. In fact, as the British are finding out, it is a nightmare.

As for the elimination of tonsillectomies, that should not be a big deal, since according to one expert, most tonsillectomies are the result of greedy doctors who want to perform unnecessary surgeries. And the elimination of varicose vein removal, that would go over real big in Florida.

The NHS is establishing a Medical Lottery to reduce costs. A computer will choose a number 0-9 just before any medical procedure. The 0's will be denied treatment, but will be allowed to go home to do as well as they can on their own.

Dr. J.M.B.Shwecter of the NHS: We can't treat everyone, and we don't want to play God. We feel that the divine hand acts through the role of chance as implemented by the computer.

An anonymous NHS spokesman denies that there is a cheat switch on the computer for use by "bigwigs". He confirms that 1 may be included along with 0 depending on budget savings.

If i was more conspiracy minded, i think i could come up with a wicked theory to explain all of this.

See, the british know that the only reason why their socialism kind of, sort of works is because america is not socialist. their socialism free rides on our capitalism, see? so they are putting out all of these bad news stories to keep us from adopting their system, to ensure that their system still has a fighting chance.

All that sounds plausible and all, however, until you remember the adage that one should never chalk up to malice what one can ascribe to incompetance.

And about the tonsillectomies....not all of them are performed for children....it hurts like one thing when you are 21 and get them out because of repeated tonsilitis, not just sore throat....It is when the tonsils are full of white pus that it is time to consider having them pulled....

After reading about what Obama said on the subject via the WSJ,I continue to maintain that Obama is either:

Contributors

These Are Only MY Opinions

In case you were wondering, all opinions and views expressed on this blog are my own, and do not represent the views of any employer or other organization.

Terms of Use

By using this blog, you agree that all original content on this blog is copyright of William A. Jacobson. You may quote from my posts provided that you clearly identify me as the author, link to the original post or home address of this blog, and do not charge for access to the website, publication or other media in which the quote appears. Although comments are moderated, I accept no responsibility for what other people say, and I reserve the right to block or remove any comment for any reason or no reason. Any e-mails sent to me are subject to publication, and any disputes regarding this site will be litigated exclusively in the jurisidiction in which I reside at the time of the dispute.