A ruler's power is ultimately dependent on support from the people he would rule. His moral authority,
economic resources, transport system, government bureaucracy, army, and police-to name but a few immediate
sources of his power-rest finally upon the cooperation and assistance of other people. If there is general
conformity, the ruler is powerful.

But people do not always do what their rulers would like them to do. The factory manager recognizes
this when he finds his workers leaving their jobs and machines, so that the production line ceases operation;
or when he finds the workers persisting in doing something on the job which he has forbidden them to
do. In many areas of social and political life comparable situations are commonplace. A man who has
been a ruler and thought his power sure may discover that his subjects no longer believe he has any
moral right to give them orders, that his laws are disobeyed, that the country's economy is paralyzed,
that his soldiers and police are lax in carrying out repression or openly mutiny, and even that his
bureaucracy no longer takes orders. When this happens, the man who has been ruler becomes simply another
man, and his political power dissolves, just as the factory manager's power does when the workers no
longer cooperate and obey. The equipment of his army may remain intact, his soldiers uninjured and very
much alive, his cities unscathed, the factories and transport systems in full operational capacity,
and the government buildings and offices unchanged. Yet because the human assistance which had created
and supported his political power has been withdrawn, the former ruler finds that his political power
has disintegrated.

Nonviolent Action

The technique of nonviolent action, which is based on this approach to the control of political power
and the waging of political struggles, has been the subject of many misconceptions: for the sake of
clarity the two terms are defined in this section.

The term technique is used here to describe the overall means of conducting an action or struggle.
One can therefore speak of the technique of guerrilla warfare, of conventional warfare, and of parliamentary
democracy.

The term nonviolent action refers to those methods of protest, noncooperation, and intervention in
which the actionists, without employing physical violence, refuse to do certain things which they are
expected, or required, to do; or do certain things which they are not expected, or are forbidden, to
do. In a particular case there can of course be a combination of acts of omission and acts of commission.

Nonviolent action is a generic term: it includes the large class of phenomena variously called nonviolent
resistance, satyagraha, passive resistance, positive action, and nonviolent direct action. While it
is not violent, it is action, and not inaction; passivity, submission, and cowardice must be surmounted
if it is to be used. It is a means of conducting conflicts and waging struggles, and is not to be equated
with (though it may be accompanied by) purely verbal dissent or solely psychological influence. It is
not pacifism, and in fact has in the vast majority of cases been applied by nonpacifists. The motives
for the adoption of nonviolent action may be religious or ethical or they may be based on considerations
of expediency. Nonviolent action is not an escapist approach to the problem of violence, for it can
be applied in struggles against opponents relying on violent sanctions. The fact that in a conflict
one side is nonviolent does not imply that the other side will also refrain from violence. Certain forms
of nonviolent action may be regarded as efforts to persuade by action, while others are more coercive.

Methods of Nonviolent Action

There is a very wide range of methods, or forms, of nonviolent action, and at least 197 have been
identified. They fall into three classes - nonviolent protest and persuasion, noncooperation, and nonviolent
intervention.

Generally speaking, the methods of nonviolent protest are symbolic in their effect and produce an
awareness of the existence of dissent. Under tyrannical regimes, however, where opposition is stifled,
their impact can in some circumstances be very great. Methods of nonviolent protest include marches,
pilgrimages, picketing, vigils, "haunting" officials, public meetings, issuing and distributing protest
literature, renouncing honors, protest emigration, and humorous pranks.

The methods of nonviolent noncooperation, if sufficient numbers take part, are likely to present
the opponent with difficulties in maintaining the normal efficiency and operation of the system; and
in extreme cases the system itself may be threatened. Methods of nonviolent noncooperation include various
types of social noncooperation (such as social boycotts); economic boycotts (such as consumers' boycott,
traders' boycott, rent refusal, and international trade embargo); strikes (such as the general strike,
strike by resignation, industry strike, go-slow, and economic shutdown); and political noncooperation
(such as boycott of government employment, boycott of elections, administrative noncooperation, civil
disobedience, and mutiny).

The methods of nonviolent intervention have some features in common with the first two classes, but
also challenge the opponent more directly; and, assuming that fearlessness and discipline are maintained,
relatively small numbers may have a disproportionately large impact. Methods of nonviolent intervention
include sit-ins, fasts, reverse strikes, nonviolent obstructions, nonviolent invasion, and parallel
government.

The exact way in which methods from each of the three classes are combined varies considerably from
one situation to another. Generally speaking, the risks to the actionists on the one hand, and to the
system against which they take action on the other, are least in the case of nonviolent protest, and
greatest in the case of nonviolent intervention. The methods of noncooperation tend to require the largest
numbers, but not to demand a large degree of special training from all participants. The methods of
nonviolent intervention are generally effective if the participants possess a high degree of internal
discipline and are willing to accept severe repression; the tactics must also be selected and carried
out with particular care and intelligence.

Several important factors need to be considered in the selection of the methods to be used in a given
situation. These factors include the type of issue involved, the nature of the opponent, his aims and
strength, the type of counteraction he is likely to use the depth of feeling both among the general
population and among the likely actionists, the degree of repression the actionists are likely to be
able to take, the general strategy of the overall campaign, and the amount of past experience and specific
training the population and the actionists have had. Just as in military battle weapons are carefully
selected, taking into account such factors as their range and effect, so also in nonviolent struggle
the choice of specific methods is very important.

Mechanisms of Change

In nonviolent struggles there are, broadly speaking, three mechanisms by which change is brought
about. Usually there is a combination of the three. They are conversion, accommodation, and nonviolent
coercion.

George Lakey has described the conversion mechanism thus: "By conversion we mean that the opponent,
as the result of the actions of the nonviolent person or group, comes around to a new point of view
which embraces the ends of the nonviolent actor." This conversion can be influenced by reason or argument,
but in nonviolent action it is also likely to be influenced by emotional and moral factors, which can
in turn be stimulated by the suffering of the nonviolent actionists, who seek to achieve their goals
without inflicting injury on other people.

Attempts at conversion, however, are not always successful, and may not even be made. Accommodation
as a mechanism of nonviolent action falls in an intermediary position between conversion and nonviolent
coercion, and elements of both of the other mechanisms are generally involved. In accommodation, the
opponent, although not converted, decides to grant the demands of the nonviolent actionists In a situation
where he still has a choice of action. The social situation within which he must operate has been altered
enough be nonviolent action to compel a change in his own response to the conflict; perhaps because
he has begun to doubt the rightness of his position, perhaps because he does not think the matter worth
the trouble caused by the struggle, and perhaps because he anticipates coerced defeat and wishes to
accede gracefully or with minimum or losses.

Nonviolent coercion may take place in any of three circumstances. Defiance may become too widespread
and massive for the ruler to be able to control it by repression; the social and political system may
become paralyzed; or the extent of defiance or disobedience among the ruler's own soldiers and other
agents may undermine his capacity to apply repression. Nonviolent coercion becomes possible when those
applying nonviolent action succeed in withholding, directly or indirectly, the necessary sources of
the ruler's political power. His power then disintegrates, and he is no longer able to control the situation,
even though he still wishes to do so.

Just as in war danger from enemy fire does not always force front line soldiers to panic and flee,
so in nonviolent action repression does not necessarily produce submission. True, repression may be
effective, but it may fail to halt defiance, and in this case the opponent will be in difficulties.
Repression against a nonviolent group which persists in face of it and maintains nonviolent discipline
may have the following effects: it may alienate the general population from the opponent's regime, making
them more likely to join the resistance; it may alienate the opponent's usual supporters and agents,
and their initial uneasiness may grow into internal opposition and at times into noncooperation and
disobedience; and it may rally general public opinion (domestic or international) to the support of
the nonviolent actionists; though the effectiveness of this last factor varies greatly from one situation
to another, it may produce various types of supporting actions. If repression thus produces larger numbers
of nonviolent actionists, thereby increasing the defiance, and if it leads to internal dissent among
the opponent's supporters, thereby reducing his capacity to deal with the defiance, it will dearly have
rebounded against the opponent.

Naturally, with so many variables (including the nature of the contending groups, the issues involved,
the context of the struggle, the means of repression. and the methods of nonviolent action used), in
no two instances will nonviolent action "work" in exactly the same way. However, it is possible to indicate
in very general terms the ways in which it does achieve results. It is, of course, sometimes defeated:
no technique of action can guarantee its user short-term victory in every instance of its use. It is
important to recognize, however, that failure in nonviolent action may be caused, not by an inherent
weakness of the technique, but by weakness in the movement employing it, or in the strategy and tactics
used.

Strategy is just as important in nonviolent action as it is in military action. While military strategic
concepts and principles cannot be automatically carried over into the field of nonviolent struggle,
since the dynamics and mechanisms of military and nonviolent action differ greatly, the basic importance
of strategy and tactics is in no way diminished. The attempt to cope with strategic and tactical problems
associated with civilian defense (national defense by prepared nonviolent resistance) therefore needs
to be based on thorough consideration of the dynamics and mechanisms of nonviolent struggle; and on
consideration of the general principles of strategy and tactics appropriate to the technique-both those
peculiar to it and those which mat be carried over from the strategy of military and other types of
conflict.

Development of the Technique

Nonviolent action has a long history but because historians have often been more concerned with other
matters, much information has undoubtedly been lost. Even today, this field is largely ignored, and
there is no good history of the practice and development of the technique. But it clearly began early.
For example, in 494 B.C. the plebeians of Rome, rather than murder the Consuls, withdrew from the city
to the Sacred Mount where they remained for some days, thereby refusing to make their usual contribution
to the life of the city, until an agreement was reached pledging significant improvements in their life
and status.

A very significant pre-Gandhian expansion of the technique took place in the 19th and early 20th
centuries. The technique received impetus from three groups during this period: first from trade unionists
and other social radicals who sought a means of struggle-largely strikes, general strikes, and boycotts-against
what they regarded as an unjust social system, and for an improvement in the condition of working men;
second, from nationalists who found the technique useful in resisting a foreign enemy such as the Hungarian
resistance against Austria between 1850 and 1867, and the Chinese boycotts of Japanese goods in the
early 20th century; and third, on the level of ideas and personal example, from individuals, such as
Leo Tolstoy in Russia and Henry David Thoreau in the U.S.A., who wanted to show how a better society
might be created.

With Gandhi's experiments in the use of nonviolent action to control rulers, alter policies, and
undermine political systems, the character of the technique was broadened and refinements were made
in its practice. Many modifications were introduced: greater attention was given to strategy and tactics;
the armory of methods was expanded; and a link was consciously forged between mass political action
and the ethical principle of nonviolence. Gandhi, with his political colleagues and fellow Indians,
demonstrated in a variety of conflicts in South Africa and India that nonviolent struggle could be politically
effective on a large scale. He termed his refinement of the technique "satyagraha," meaning roughly
insistence and reliance upon the force of truth. "In politics, its use is based upon the immutable maxim,
that government of the people is possible only so long as they consent either consciously or unconsciously
to be governed."

Softpanorama hot topic of the month

Softpanorama Recommended

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available
in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on
this site is distributed without profit exclusivly for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

ABUSE: IPs or network segments from which we detect a stream of probes might be blocked for no
less then 90 days. Multiple types of probes increase this period.

The site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. You you do not want to be
tracked by Google please disable Javascript for this site. This site is perfectly usable without
Javascript.

Original materials copyright belong
to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only
in compliance with the fair use doctrine.

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available
to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social
issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which
such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.

This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free)
site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should
be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...

You can use PayPal to make a contribution, supporting development
of this site and speed up access. In case softpanorama.org is down you can use the at softpanorama.info

Disclaimer:

The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or
referenced source) and are
not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other organization the author may be associated with.We do not warrant the correctness
of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose.