Sunday, December 16, 2018

The nation’s most populous liberal state has moved its presidential nominating contest to early in the 2020 calendar, a shift its leaders hope will give it maximum impact on the selection of a Democratic nominee and push candidates to address progressive issues such as climate change.

Selling white Democrat disenfranchisement as a way to “address progressive issues such as climate change” that only white Democrats care about is a nice touch.

With Deval Patrick out and Cory Booker too weird to pose a real threat, Kamala’s biggest obstacle in winning the nomination is a structural one. At 86% and 91%, Iowa and New Hampshire are far whiter than the country as a whole, at 61%, is. Not since Bill Clinton in 1992 has the eventual Democrat nominee failed to win at least one of those first two states.

If Kamala wins either one, the nomination is almost certainly hers. Nevada and South Carolina will have non-white majorities among their Democrat primary-goers so she will easily win contests #3 and #4. With the huge California prize now part of Super Tuesday–as opposed to being an irrelevant afterthought as was the case in 2016–a day that already includes Texas, where non-whites will make up three-fourths Democrat primary-goers, it’s conceivable she will have effectively clinched the nomination by the first week of March.

The Democrats desperately want to run "a woman of color" for President, but they know perfectly well that doing so would be electoral suicide. So, they'll run her in 2020, when they know no one is going to beat an ascendant Donald Trump who will have put the Mueller probe behind him by then. Trump will also be in good form in 2020, as he will likely be stimulated in a productive manner by the replacement of the back-stabbing of the Establishment Republican House with the open opposition of the Democratic House.

The serious candidates are Beto and Garcetti, both of whom will be given dry runs to prep them for 2024. I think Beto is more serious, as Jewish influence in the Democratic Party is clearly fading.

We may be at the peak, but that still means we have the rest of mountain to climb back down from. It took two, possibly three, generations to get to where we are now. I suspect it will take the same amount to get back to where we ought to be.

Cable News is going to follow the Boomers into their graves, but the other vectors of this social poison are still alive and well - especially college. Marked progress won't be made until the Boomers start dying off.

It will be interesting to see if there is any shift beginning from within white guilt enclaves toward self interest in 2020. Going by the behavior of English whites in South Africa there will be a fierce doubling down as the walls continue to close in on them.

Kamala got into politics on her back, as the toad-like Willie Brown's mistress, and they attended sex orgies together..This is so well known in CA that it might be somewhat difficult to suppress..Other than that, she has no known beliefs...

Yes, well, "dear" Kamala is as arrogant and self-righteous as any other Commiecrat, so she has that going for her. On the other hand, the very idea that somebody who likely got where they are by "servicing" Willie Brown until he was no longer useful to her has a chance of capturing the Presidency is rather foolish. Not to mention that like most of the Darwinian also-rans trying to get the nod from the Commiecrat primary voters, her political positions won't stand much examination to discerning voters, as she and the rest of that lot are, figuratively speaking, to the left of Chairman Mao.

As one of CH's authors points out on twitter the Right cannot even understand Occasional Cortex much less a full fledged establishment created and supported stooge such as Harris.

The Left creates the narrative then the Right flails about within it. If it weren't Trump I would say just install Harris as prez right now and spare us the political theatre we would have to endure of a campaign/struggle session.

As for Peak Black, spare me, when the Left is done with blacks then we will have seen peak Black and not a moment before. But Black dethronement will be brutal.

A tally of the fundraising for the campaign to elect Hillary Clinton president shows that the top five donors are Jewish.

https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=94066

Then Goldberg said he had just read something “that knocked my socks off.” The Center for Responsive Politics issued a list of the top 50 donors to 527’s and super-PACs, and eight of the 36 Republican bigs were Jewish, and of the 14 Democrats, only one was not Jewish.

There was one non-Jew who was giving big money to the Democrats. That’s gigantic in the terms of American politics.

Whatever the reason, in his recent campaign against Cruz, O'Rourke was very heavily promoted by the legacy media. Almost reminiscent of the way that Obama and Macron were launched -- from nobody to household word in a very brief period.Bob's multibillionaire father-in-law seems to wield a lot of influence, but gets little media coverage.

I think it’s adorable that the Dems are planning for their future so far out like that. Like little kids playing house. Like the Clintons unaware their on their farewell tour. As if everything will just continue on as it was. One year after the next. The ground will be there under their feet again tomorrow when they get up.I think they are going the way of that neo-con mag, what was the name of it again?

Unless something changes, I don't know if Trump will win in 2020. Not that the Dems that carried him over the finish line will vote for a Harris, I just think they won't vote at all.

No wall, no end in sight to the healthcare misery, food prices rising AGAIN, every week there is a story that it's a banner year for illegal immigration and most of all the Derp State is still very much in tact and running the show.

The Democrats desperately want to run "a woman of color" for President, but they know perfectly well that doing so would be electoral suicide. So, they'll run her in 2020, when they know no one is going to beat an ascendant Donald Trump

The thing is their ground troops are absolutely convinced they are going to win in a landslide blow out.

They are wrong of course.

In the past 100 years only three incumbent presidents, (who stood for reelection) have lost.

All three had coalitions that collapsed behind them.

Hoover lost because the Lincoln coalition (which had been shaky for a while), fell due the start of the Depression. I would argue that the Depression itself was not the prime reason he was turned out of office.

In Carter's case the New Deal Coalition fell apart about the time he was seeking reelection.

James Dixon wrote:Then he'll win. They have to vote for the Dem's for them to have any chance.

The Hillary-voting Whites will turn out for the camel. Need the Reagan/Trump Dems to counter.

If Trump spends the next two years defying Congress, building The Wall and deporting them all, the Trumpslide is on. If he goes back to the appearance of feebleness that marked his first two years, even Camela Hairless can't save him.

Oh I WISH! Most (White) people don't even KNOW about black-on-white assaults and beatings and torture and rape and murder! The few that make the news are "one-offs" -- and oh hell, even *I* believed that when I was stalked, harassed, and forcibly kissed by a black PoS (when I was naive 15-yr-old; and too "polite" to ask anyone on the streets to help me or stop him or get him away from me! Young, innocent, nice girl -- like girls were SUPPOSED to be in a White society....).

I did not, at that time, attribute it to 'typical black pimp trying to pick up a first-time-in-the-big-city White girl." (I came in to meet my sister for lunch. I really fully believed that HE was a bad man, but it had no connection whatsoever to his race! MOST Whites with little exposure to blacks think that way...

My Southern husband asked: "what the hell is WRONG with you Northerners that you know know what they're like?" I answered: "There were TWO blacks in my high school -- and they acted White. I really believed there was no difference except skin color... till I got into the Navy and met 'regular' blacks!"

So, the awakened Whites have reach (or far-passed) "peak" acceptance or disregard for TNB; but we're still too few and too far apart!

@29 " I really believed there was no difference except skin color... till I got into the Navy and met 'regular' blacks!"

Yup. That sounds about right. I got my awakening in boot camp.

Some black dude left his canteen behind at the mess hall. I discretely picked it up and gave it back to him (losing gear is a big no-no). Even though we were at a point where we could speak freely with each other, the man just took his canteen without so much as grateful nod. I guess I must have made a hurt or confused face because another recruit (Northern, high IQ black) asked me what happened. I told him the story and he responded with simply, "Niggers are ungrateful".

IF Clooney's in the closet and wants to remain so, do you really thing the media will out him if he's the Democrat nominee? Those dogs won't hunt. Everything he's done the past few years points to him clearing the deck for a run - getting married, having kids, selling off his tequila business for big bucks.

I fear the neocons and #NeverTrumpers will try to gin up some famous general to run as a 3rd party candidate against Trump, thus splitting the vote enough to hand the victory to whichever traitor wins the Democrat primary.

Clooney was badly injured on the set of Syriana in 2004.https://www.sbs.com.au/movies/article/2018/04/07/how-syriana-almost-killed-george-clooneyHe's been on pain meds since then. He's definitely connected, but if you look at his movies since then, they're a little quieter on the action. I don't think he can make it through a God-Emperor level 3-4-5 campaign stops a day kind of thing even if he uses Hillary-level drugs.

I fear the neocons and #NeverTrumpers will try to gin up some famous general to run as a 3rd party candidate against Trump, thus splitting the vote enough to hand the victory to whichever traitor wins the Democrat primary.

The NeverTrumpers are going to try, that is a given but frankly I don't see anybody of consequence getting aboard that sinking ship.

In truth there are no famous generals that are up there with Ike. We aren't that kind of a country anymore and Iraq/Afghanistan wasn't conducive to battlefield glory.

Mitt Romney is going to try and get the nomination away from Trump. He's already making the fundraising rounds but the man never really had any backing from the mainstream voters.

Romeny was bitten by the Dream and he can't let it die. He's sort of like Hillary in that regard. And he is just as big of a winner.

I fear the neocons and #NeverTrumpers will try to gin up some famous general to run as a 3rd party candidate against Trump, thus splitting the vote enough to hand the victory to whichever traitor wins the Democrat primary.

I missed my own point.

It was Bush himself that split the coalition that elected him.

Rather than embrace the Reagan-Democrat faction, he fell back on GOPe's favored position of Anti-Unionism. Then he raised taxes after basically shooting a commercial for whoever was going to be running against him in 1992, "Read my lips! No, new taxes!"

The Reagan-Democrat vote never went away, it was waiting there on the ground. Waiting for anyone who wanted to pick it up again.

In summary: Trump's base can't be split by the NeverTrumpers and the Neo-cons. It can't be split from the outside. The only guy that can break the Trump coalition is Trump. And he seems to be keenly aware of it.

All of the presidents, who have mentioned the subject in any way, have consistently said that they were able to accomplish MORE when the opposition party controlled Congress, than when their own party controlled Congress.

Many of the two-term presidents in both parties have had the experience of both situations during their time in the Oval Office.

That makes sense in many ways. We have seen the "Republican" leadership of both houses of Congress directly oppose and even publicly sneer at the President's agenda. All of these inner conflicts between the political gods occur on Mount Olympus, far away from the eyes of mere mortals and there is no reliable media coverage, so we cannot do more than imagine the subtle stare-down that goes on every day over control of the party. It must seem refreshing to resort to quid pro quo exchanges with corrupt and corruptible Democrats for their votes.

Yes, ideological Democrats are like very nervous co-conspirators. They have agreed to enter into a conspiracy against their own constituents but they are so anxious about getting caught and exposed that they may drive off in the getaway car before the robbers exit the bank. The Democrat leadership, being old China hands in Washington, may be reliable for graft and corruption, but what about the younger crowd, or the ideological Bernies, or the identity-driven black and hispanic militants? Not quite like herding cats, but pretty close.

Historically, it's almost impossible to win the Presidency without being a governor. Doubly so if you are running against a governor...or incumbent President. And in 2020, Trump will have four years in office to run on. He won't be the "hope he's not as bad as Hitlary" candidate.

Harris has none of that. She'll run, throwing the race, gender, and looks cards. And Trump will take those cards, wrap them around the yard-long rebar of his first term, and smack her over the head with it.

For the record, my money is on a protracted Dem primary. I would not bet on any outcomes...but were I doing Trump's strategic planning, bet on Andrew Cuomo. I'd rate him the least weak opponent at this time.

I fear the neocons and #NeverTrumpers will try to gin up some famous general to run as a 3rd party candidate against Trump, thus splitting the vote enough to hand the victory to whichever traitor wins the Democrat primary.

The only living general that could fit that bill is Colin Powell, former Secretary of State, whom the Republipukes have tried to draft several times for the Oval Office.....that was before he publicly endorsed Obama TWICE in 2008 and 2012.

Personally, my greater fear is that the Democrats will break their old habits and do exactly that....get Colin Powell to switch parties and run for president. No matter who Powell runs against on the Republican ticket, he is going to seem more experienced and appeal more to the patriots. Independents would support a candidate obviously less partisan than the usual choices.

Powell is going to be keenly aware of the even more famous generals in his own lifetime....Eisenhower and McArthur. The only one that was politically successful was the one who switched parties to run for president. The Republicans refused to support the better general.

If the Democrats run their usual selection, they will lose another hard-fought campaign. Americans are not going to knowingly vote for a Leftist for president.

DonReynolds December 16, 2018 2:09 PMAll of the presidents, who have mentioned the subject in any way, have consistently said that they were able to accomplish MORE when the opposition party controlled Congress, than when their own party controlled Congress.

A common thing is that they pander to the other side, thus pick up votes in the middle. Nixon was a conspicuous example of this. A right wing anti communist who broke the ice with Communist China and expanded the government. And Bush I or II, the theoretical Republicans. Clinton did the same thing to some extent. Wasn't all that liberal in terms of policy.

Maybe that is why Trump doesn't take on the Deep State all that much. He sees himself as picking up votes on the other side. Plus voters are ingrates. Accomplish something, like, say the wall, and it will be off the table for the next election.

Definitely not the tidal wave they were predicting. Not even that nice mid-set wave that you can ride all the way into the beach. More like that last one or two waves in the set that you settle for: disappointing, but technically a wave.

Kidding aside, I was really hoping Vox and others were right about the midterms. I'm stuck deep in blue territory where the fake Americans vote according to their interests and the virtue signaling whites fall all over themselves to loudly do the opposite. It's depressing, and I'd hoped there were enough crimethinkers like me out there to keep the dems from taking the house. Anyway, here's hoping you all are right about 2020.

I fear the neocons and #NeverTrumpers will try to gin up some famous general to run as a 3rd party candidate against Trump, thus splitting the vote enough to hand the victory to whichever traitor wins the Democrat primary.

The only living general that could fit that bill is Colin Powell, former Secretary of State, whom the Republipukes have tried to draft several times for the Oval Office.....that was before he publicly endorsed Obama TWICE in 2008 and 2012.

Personally, my greater fear is that the Democrats will break their old habits and do exactly that....get Colin Powell to switch parties and run for president. No matter who Powell runs against on the Republican ticket, he is going to seem more experienced and appeal more to the patriots. Independents would support a candidate obviously less partisan than the usual choices...

If the Democrats run their usual selection, they will lose another hard-fought campaign. Americans are not going to knowingly vote for a Leftist for president.

Jason Kessler voted for D'Won and it didn't stop his rise to leadership in the Nazi wing of the fake right. Powell could have a similar though less dramatic 'conversion' and spout the civ-nat line a la Trump while working for Bill Kristol, PNAC, et al. or their Donk division. Powell's leftism is less in-your-face than Harris' but the objectives are similar. While you and most here are aware of it, the idiocracy in Kwa-Bananaland haven't a clue about it, his long service to globalism, etc. They just want to "thank him for his service" (to the Bankstein Banana Empire). He could even play up his glorious generalship in the Cakewalk War of 1991 under Poppy Bush. Could be a very effective way to deceptively split off segments of Trump's base, especially if there's no wall, more gun control and continued imperial adventures in the Graveyard of Empires, Syria, etc. If Trump pulls a Trump and flips the tables by actually keeping his promises, the D-jerseys will likely try something more like Harris or even the Occasional Cortex - as the 2020 edition of the John Kerry sacrifice. Another angle for the deep-state to employ against a weakened Trump would be to have a new Ross Perot style figure - like Bloomberg, Zuckerberg or even Musk - run as an independent who is concerned about the economy.

Hammerli280 wrote:Harris has none of that. She'll run, throwing the race, gender, and looks cards. And Trump will take those cards, wrap them around the yard-long rebar of his first term, and smack her over the head with it.

Looks? She'd better not play that card. Trannie Trump would look younger, hotter and tighter than Camels Hairball. Race and vagina are all she has going for her, and if the trannie acceptance movement gains a little more momentum, ``muh 'gina'' isn't going to do as much for her as it did for Hillary.

I'm not so sure, even if the Trump ascendancy was a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence, that the left will ever really regain their position as protectors of the weak, standing up for teh wahmen, environmentalism etc.

We may see a period of stark opposites: the tough and sensible nationalist versus the globalist greasing all the right palms. Another decade or so and we may actually see constructive debates that find common ground among the currently-warring factions.

Unless Trump undergoes a personality transplant and decides to become more than a fierce sounding Jeb Bush, Trump is not going to be a strong candidate in 2020. The browning and feminization of America will make it hard to win some of the swing states and Florida no matter what Trump accomplishes. Not even trying to deliver on core campaign promises will make his defeat a foregone conclusion. Cernovich is tweeting that he finds Trump voters to be turning away from Trump. I can believe it.

Harris would have no problem winning Iowa or New Hampshire. Obama won Iowa and tied NH in 2008. Harris's problems, like Obama's in 2008, will come in states like Ohio with significant but not majority non-white blocks. Hillary ran better in those states but she never tried to capitalize on the white-flight from Obama.

no, it's more a matter of the Universalist, hardLeft tikkun olas replacing the Zionist warmongers...who are concentrating in the Republiscam pty. The Dem pty, like the Republiscams, remains firmly under Jewish control.

in fact, Kamala H's husband is a well-connected Jew lawyer.

Harris (who can appear Black to a Black audience and White to a White) will defeat a fading Trump (if he's the nominee at all) by 5 to 10 points in the popular vote and - if she's smart enough to bring in Beto as VP - will flip Texas blue, carry Florida easily, and win the in EC by c. 400 votes.

You guys really think Trump can win again? I know Vox was right when nearly everyone else was wrong last time, but I sure don't see it in 2020.

First of all, Trump Derangement Syndrome isn't going away. Every leftist will make damn sure they vote, and that all their friends do (even the imaginary ones). The ones whose job it is to manufacture votes will work double shifts.

Meanwhile, a great many Trump supporters are deeply disappointed in him. Doesn't mean they'll vote Democrat, but I expect a lot of them to fade into the woodwork on Election Day. Perhaps a Harris candidacy will scare some of them back to the polls, but Biden certainly won't.

What might save Trump is if he gets the Wall built late in 2020--in time to revive the enthusiasm of his supporters, but before they come to realize that it's just a boondoggle for his friends in the construction industry.

There must be a way to further goad the democrats into anti-white identity politics. There is never going to be a "white vote" coming from the cuckservatives and sellout party. But the left may deliver exactly that just by allowing themselves to be themselves. That's why the little bug-eyed socialist chihuahua, Occasional Cortex, is identity politics gold. I wanted her to become speaker. So did a lot of the little upstarts, who learned the hard way that the democrats are run by an old guard just like the republicans.

Doktor Jeep wrote:There must be a way to further goad the democrats into anti-white identity politics. There is never going to be a "white vote" coming from the cuckservatives and sellout party. But the left may deliver exactly that just by allowing themselves to be themselves.

That's why the little bug-eyed socialist chihuahua, Occasional Cortex, is identity politics gold. I wanted her to become speaker. So did a lot of the little upstarts, who learned the hard way that the democrats are run by an old guard just like the republicans.

It is hard for ego-centric politicians to accept the nasty fact of American voting patterns...People do not often vote FOR anybody in this country, the vote AGAINST the other sorry rascal. If pressed to explain the campaign promises or party policies that moved them to their choice, very few could actually do that. You would do much better to ask them what they hated about the opponent.

Donald Trump has never run for public office before 2016 and it would be difficult to use his life history and public statements to predict how he would govern as president. I would dare say that a good bit of the Trump vote was actually an anti-Hillary vote, and if the Democrats had run their favorite mule instead, Donald may not have won.

Ingot9455 wrote:We are going to have to put a lot of people in jail for voter fraud to tamp that down for the next election, that's for certain.

The last q&a with Q suggested that they don't plan to do anything about the fraud in 2018. That's going to discourage turnout on the Right, and encourage fraud on the Left.

Trump has two years left, and he could still pull off another Trumpslide. He'll have to pick up his pace to make it happen.

Donald, we didn't elect you for the economy, and we didn't elect you to end the Korean War. We elected you to build us a Big, Beautiful Wall and end the influx of illegals and refugees. We elected you to deport the DACA nightmares and the rest of the illegals. Donald, build the wall and deport them all, and you'll be a shoe-in for 2020.

If there are sex tapes and they come out it won't hurt her much if at all.

"Even someone who has worked as tirelessly and fought as hard as I have felt the overwhelming pressure to debase myself to shatter the glass ceiling. Now that I've done it, I can help millions of women all across America do the same. The women of America will finally have an ally in the White House--and the Kavanaughs of the world will finally have an enemy!"

A governor or former governor hasn't won the presidency since 2004. "Executive experience" isn't a phrase that comes up much anymore. Internet searches for it in fact peaked in September of 2008. Another sign of decline, probably, but it's nothing close to a necessity.

I think Trump can beat Harris IF the DOJ gets active against vote fraud, and Trump doesn't do anything further to alienate his voters, like issue the odious and unConstitutional "bump stock" seizure. But frankly, I think he would have greater difficulty against a male candidate, pick one.

I don't see this as a "sacrificial lamb", but as a killing lunge by the DSA/progressive caucus.

First off, Kamala is a machine politician who presents a bland figure to the public while perpetrating utter insanity behind the scenes in the exact same way Obama did.

Second, there are 2 factors which have changed since 2016:

1 - Despite Trump's considerable progress toward his promises, he has provided no VISIBLE signs of fight on either the rampant and very public politicization of the DOJ or border security. The Rust Belt Reaganites supported him because he presented as a fighter, but his bending over on these plain-as-day problems has caused them to go back to sleep.

2 - Democrats have completely normalized mass voter fraud via "Ballot Harvesting", with the conspicuous CONSENT of the national GOP.

They wanted this election to be a catastrophic repudiation of the Trump Agenda because he was dismantling the Donor Class's wealth exfiltration pipelines. When that didn't happen, they dropped all pretense and just kept on delivering ballots for weeks after election day.

It's very clear, to me at least, that they intend to present a bland candidate who can make a completely fraudulent election look believable, then ram through the remainder of the International Socialist SJW Agenda, the people be d*mned..

They found out just how much they could get away with when erecting the EU and now, having successfully imported "antifa" to our shores without them being shot by patriots, they bring it all to the USA.

"What might save Trump is if he gets the Wall built late in 2020--in time to revive the enthusiasm of his supporters, but before they come to realize that it's just a boondoggle for his friends in the construction industry. "

Nobody cares if it is a boondoggle for AMERICAN builders -- at least the money will stay in the states, rather than going overseas.

Trump's chances depend entirely on his performance in the next two years.

It's encouraging that even though Republicucks failed to deliver on either the Wall or the Obamacare repeal. Even though 40 of them cucked out and retired, thus ruining the incumbent advantage in several races and causing the GOP to have to spread themselves thinner fighting more battles than necessary. Even though the Democrats pulled every dirty trick in the book, including social media censorship and stealing seats after the election. STILL the Democrats only won a narrow majority the House and actually lost seats in the Senate.

It means that if Trump simply delivers on some of the more important issues, he should easily win. Wall, North Korea, Infrastructure, among other things would lead to a Trump win. But again, he actually has to deliver on them.

ALSO I think Trump has to somehow regain the upper hand in the healthcare debate. It's been the #1 issue for voters of most of the elections in the past decade. It buoyed Republicans to victories during the Obama era. And it helped Democrats in 2018 after the likes of Paul Ryan and John McCain fucked everything up in the Repeal & Replace process.

It used to be 50 states had laws against it, but California, now being a single party state, has decided that it's no longer a crime to go door to door telling idiots and the too-easily manipulated elderly, "here's your ballot... and ... here, let me help you mark your ballot so it gets counted."

Garuna wrote:ALSO I think Trump has to somehow regain the upper hand in the healthcare debate.

The recent ruling that the 0bammy Care Act is unconstitutional gives him new scope to work there. He has a chance to regain the upper hand. The cool thing is that this is obvious fallout from repealing the penalty-miscalled-a-tax, so it may be something Trump anticipated, fooled the GOP into doing, and has a plan to exploit.

I see two things left to do: scalia Ginsberg and replace it with someone on the Right, and get the 9th Circus to issue a contradictory ruling so it goes to the Supremes.

Why hurry Ginsberg along? Because the Left couldn't wait for Scalia to kick the bucket.

It used to be 50 states had laws against it, but California, now being a single party state, has decided that it's no longer a crime to go door to door telling idiots and the too-easily manipulated elderly, "here's your ballot... and ... here, let me help you mark your ballot so it gets counted."

This is why we need secession. Or, Trump could go after the California legislature the way Lincoln went after the Maryland legislature. Normies are less impressed by Trump because normies see a whole lot of business as usual, and little of the bold action they wanted. Decisively shutting down vote fraud would make Trump look very, very good to the normies.

If the country is to have some kind of civil war and break apart circa 2030-32, then Trump will have to lose to Beto/Harris or some such pairing. Anyway, a *truly* far-left "progressive" administration. That would take the country from 2021 to 2029. And that should do it.

And yet it still happened across the nation, with the most visible being in Arizona, primarily because Trump allowed rampant criminality to continue in other areas, such as ANTIFA camping out on people's lawns and violently stalking political targets like the KKK

Maricopa county was Joe Arpaio's county.A county like that doesn't elect an SJW like "enema" without blatant theft, and we saw the same 'ballot harvesting' patterns we saw in Orange County.

It's not concern trolling, though I can see where it might appear that way. Let me explain.

I prefer Trump to anyone either major party has run since Goldwater, but I've never believed he was serious about cutting down on immigration. Why should he be? His businesses profit from cheap labor as much as anyone's. I think he just saw an issue he could make hay with. OK, fine; it's not like anyone else was any better.

As for the wall, I think that if built it would be to border security what TSA is to airport security. Without vigorous enforcement of the laws we already have, a wall is next to useless; with enforcement, a wall is unnecessary.

The Wall is important for multiple reasons, not least of which is the fact that it was campaign promise #1, and failing to keep campaign promises makes it harder to get reelected. Everyone who's Very Concerned about Trump's reelection should be rooting for the Wall for that reason alone, even if they can't grasp how putting a physical barrier between points A and B makes it easier to keep humans from moving from A to B.

The fact that other efforts need to come along with the Wall doesn't change any of that.

Maricopa county was Joe Arpaio's county.A county like that doesn't elect an SJW like "enema" without blatant theft

The operative word is was; it's not anymore. I live there, and nearly everyone I've talked to detests Arpaio--even the Trump supporters. Arpaio ran in the Republican primary for the Senate seat, and didn't come close.

I think what killed McSally (Sinema's opponent) was her vote for cuts in Social Security and Medicare; Sinema's TV ads hammered on that. There are a lot of seniors here. What almost lost it for Sinema was the Green Party, which got more votes than the difference between Sinema and McSally.

So we've established you're a liar. Counties like Maricopa don't swing 30 points in 4 years. Even Obama's MASSIVE inflation of the DC apparatus and its suburbs couldn't swing Virginia that much over 8 full years.

"There must be a way to further goad the democrats into anti-white identity politics. There is never going to be a "white vote" coming from the cuckservatives and sellout party. But the left may deliver exactly that just by allowing themselves to be themselves. "

Sereptitous leafletting of public schools in the suburbs, at night, with "It's OK to be White"

It's utterly inoffensive, but drives the Democrats absolutely out of their minds, and brings all the insanity and hatred of whites right to the surface.

If you can't get the cucks to vote for something, you might at least trigger the enemy into being something so angry and scary that the cucks would, at the very least, stay home rather than vote for Democrats....and if we're lucky, some might actually vote R to keep D's from winning elections.

There's other things that could be done, too, although more difficult.

The most difficult, but I think most effective, would be organizing some flash-mob of enemy-owned SWPL stores. Like Target.

The old saying "A Conservative is a Liberal who got mugged." is both true AND good advice.

Although we don't need conservatives, we need reactionaries.... but Conservative is good enough if it gets them to switch from voting D to voting R.