On Mar 29, 2012, at 7:13 AM, James Graham wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com wrote:
> If there are proprietary features that are not part of the de-facto platform (i.e. that have not been adopted by multiple vendors) but that provide functionality that we would like, encouraging people to reverse engineer the proprietary feature by putting them in a high-profile wishlist is not the correct response. The right thing to do is to ensure that there is equivalent functionality on the standards track with multi-vendor buy in.
I wholeheartedly agree. If the consensus has been to avoid vendor-prefixed CSS, why would we be pushing apple-* meta tags for inclusion in the standard?