The Blog That Burns

Fellow Burners, We pride ourselves on not being just another festival, of which there are a thousand. Black Rock City is just what it says – a city, and that implies citizenship. This is our city, and we need to speak up when forces conspire to take advantage of us.

The federal Bureau of Land Managementis attempting to impose somewhere around a million dollars extra cost for Burning Man’s annual permit (it’s held on federal land, so the BLM permit is required) this year, and they have informed the Burning Man organization that if BM won’t pay, then the bureaucrats at the BLM are going to deny us a permit to use the playa this year.

This is no joke. If Burning Man doesn’t get its permit, the event doesn’t happen. Given that we’re two months away from it and thus there is a 0% chance it could be relocated, the BLM’s demands sound a lot like extortion to me.

The last few years have seen the BLM dramatically increasing the fees it demands from Burning Man, without providing substantially more services or staffing the event with extra people. So where is the money going? Why do they need so much? This is public land, supposedly there for the public to use, and while it’s reasonable for the BMORG to pay for the costs the BLM incurs, how is it possible that their costs have increased so much while their presence on the playa is relatively unchanged?

So why the sudden extra million dollars this year? You’ve probably already seen the articles, but it’s so VIPs and BLM employees can live in luxury while they’re at Burning Man. The list of demands is absurd given the nature of Burning Man and while they’re not ON the playa (they’re about 2 miles past the playa on county road 34), they’re effectively asking for a compound that would put any billionaire’s plug n’ play camp to shame, just so some so-called VIPs can be comfortable while visiting the playa for fun.

Some of their demands, which will take between $1m and $1.2m dollars to satisfy for the week, include:· Flushable toilets and sinks.· On-demand running hot water.· Three hot meals a day, with things like burgers, chicken fingers, quesadillas, and more available between meals.· 24 hour service bar that must include, among other things, Chobani Greek Yogurt, protein bars, brownies, Hot Pockets, personal pizzas, burritos, noodle cups, cookies, jerky, Skittles, licorice, Payday bars, Snickers bars, M&Ms.· 24 hour standalone freezer for ice cream that must be stocked with: Drumsticks, Choco Tacos, Individual served ice cream – assorted flavors, popsicles, ice cream sandwiches· A salad bar for both lunches and dinners that contains a minimum of five salad toppings, mixed greens with at least three types of leafy vegetables, three types of salad dressings, and three ‘salad condiments.’· Meal suggestions include things like prime rib, t-bone steaks, roasted pork tenderloin, and so on.

Basically, what the BLM is asking for is the rock star treatment, so that their staff and these VIPs can live far better than anyone else at Burning Man does. Here, in fact, is the most infamous rider (the contract that stipulates the requirements that a band has when performing at a particular venue) of all time, for the Van Halen tour in 1982 that contained a provision specifying no brown M&Ms. Their rider has far less luxurious food requirements than the BLM’s. Van Halen, a famously indulgent rock band has requirements easier to fulfill than the BLM does. Seems pretty screwed up doesn’t it?

This is a government agency here to serve us by stewarding public land and instead of doing that they appear to be essentially extorting Burning Man for a million bucks for outright luxuries (in the context of Burning Man) that they’ve never needed previously out there. Why the change?

Dan Love

I’m told it’s because Dan Love, the agent in charge of the Winnemucca office of the BLM (where their Burning Man activities are based), has gotten greedy and is basically taking while the taking’s good, because he knows that Burning Man has to have the permit and that it’s far too late to even think about holding it elsewhere this year. That borders on corruption in my eyes. Our government is here to serve us, not the other way around. (Note, btw, that Dan is marked down as one of the people staying in the Blue Pit, below, in the "Love/Stover Trailer". Damn Dan, that looks pretty nice.)

Let’s make our voices heard. This is very much an active issue at the moment, so let’s make those higher up the food chain than Dan Love hear that the citizens whose interests they are supposed to be serving via managing public lands are outraged at this blatant money grab from a mid-level bureaucrat.

Second, get in touch with one or both of the following two people:Neil Kornze, Director of the Bureau of Land ManagementBLM Washington Office1849 C Street NWRm. 5665 Washington DC 20240Phone: 202-208-3801director@blm.govSally Jewell, Department of the Interior (Neil Kornze’s boss)Department of the Interior
1849 C Street, N.W. Washington DC 20240
Phone: (202) 208-3100
feedback@ios.doi.gov
@secretaryjewell on twitter

Let’s make ourselves heard. Write, email, tweet, call. Public officials are vulnerable to pressure, and the squeaky wheel definitely gets the grease in government.I believe that using your own words is better than copying and pasting a form letter, but it all helps (as long as it’s polite!), so if you don’t have the time to write something yourself but want to let the two people above know what you think of the BLM’s crazy demands, use the letter below.

Dear Secretary Jewell / Director Kornze, I’m writing to you in regards to the matter of the Bureau of Land Management’s recent unprecedented request for luxury amenities during the Burning Man event, for a luxury compound called the Blue Pit, totaling an estimated $1-$1.2 million.

Of course, I understand that it’s reasonable for Burning Man to pay for the BLM’s oversight during the event, but what makes little sense to me is why the fees have been rocketing up the last few years despite attendance not being substantially bigger or there being a substantially different level of BLM staffing during the event.

As a reminder, the fees have been roughly as follows: 2011: $858k 2012: $1.4 million 2013: $2.9 million 2014: $4 million 2015: $5-$5.2 million That’s quite the increase, and what is a little galling is that the increase for 2015 is driven by demands for amenities like flushable toilets, 24 hour ice cream availability, Snickers, M&Ms, salad bars, and Chobani Greek yogurt. What they’re claiming they need is worthy of what a major rock band might request, and is far beyond what anyone else at Burning Man has access to, including billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. This is an event that’s about self-reliance – we even bring our own water – and even employees of Burning Man who might spend a month out there live simply by the standards of the BLM’s request.

As Senator Harry Reid recently said, “While I agree that the BLM should take its permitting duties seriously and work with Burning Man to both guarantee the safety of its participants and the protection of the environment, providing outlandishly unnecessary facilities for the BLM and its guests should be beyond the scope of the permitting requirements.”

I wholeheartedly agree.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to reading that the BLM’s demands for Burning Man 2015’s permit are scaled back to something more reasonable.
Sincerely, <your name> <your city and state>

Update as of July 29th, 2015:

The BLM's deputy director released this today:
"I am concerned about the reported costs associated with supporting the Burning Man festival. I have directed that BLM staff take a fresh look at the initial proposals for food and facilities at the event. Our priority is to provide for participant and employee health and safety, sanitation, and environmental compliance at this unique event that is attended by up to 80,000 people in a remote part of the Nevada Desert. I have full confidence in BLM staff and their ability to develop a plan that is cost efficient and ensures public health and safety."

That's good news, but it's hardly victory - they could review the requests and then continue to stick to their guns. We need to keep the pressure on! Keep writing, emailing, and signing the change.org petition.

We're just talking about less than a $20 ticket price increase to cover this. I don't see what the big deal is. BLM officials don't ask to come to BM, and they shouldn't have to live in the gutter to take care of business.

And there are plenty of volunteers to handle cleaning their toilets. BMorg as such a long list of potential volunteers that if BLM wanted them to licks their assholes, there would be at least 100 who would step up for the job.

They weren't living in a gutter before, and nobody reports that BLM employees generally had any problem with previous accommodations that $4 million from BMan paid for. This reportedly is coming from one guy - Dan Love - who knows he has us under his thumb. Why should we pay $20 more each so he can have 24 hour ice cream and flushable toilets?

Reply

Dr. No

6/27/2015 07:29:04 am

Because the vast majority of Burners have access to these things when they are working. Even soldiers in Iraq and prisoners have access to such things. Law enforcement in general on playa is a seriously fucked up situation, but no sanctimonious bullshit about us being more enlightened than other festivals changes that fact that working at a festival is working at a festival, no matter how many shirt cockers there are.

wolfraider

6/28/2015 02:40:59 am

Let them use their $3.5 million dollar complex built in Gerlach in 2011. If it's already out of date, then I seriously think they should reconsider their building contractors and start spending the tax payers money more effectively. And Choco Taco's don't count.

Jeremiah Scout

6/27/2015 09:05:13 am

You're obviously not a Burner, otherwise you wouldn't be an advocate such misappropriation of funds.

Reply

maladroit

6/27/2015 10:00:50 am

It seems that not everyone understand this particular brand of sarcasm :)

BLM Rangers do ask to come to Burning Man, they actually compete for these slots now. And although they'd be stupid not to enjoy these facilities, these are not the requests of the field officers. They are content doing their laundry at Bruno's.

They can't add $20 to tickets that have already been sold. They should have made this request last year. Making it June 1st is ridiculous.

Reply

Randy Phillips

6/29/2015 12:29:47 am

The increase they are talking about is for about 10-12 higher level BLM people. The vast majority of agents will be stay right where they have for years. This is just about having a cushy camp the higher ups can stay in. Occasionally travel to the playa in air conditioned vehicles to see the sights. Most of their management will be via radios. This has nothing what so ever to do with safety. The agents on the ground will still be staying in Gelach. This is about the BLM and one of their upper Agents that has a stick up his ass over Burning Man. This and the new Nevada 9% festival tax. I will probably never attend again. I can not afford it now and now that I am on a fixed income it is getting out of reach

If someone wants those amenities, they should invest into a fancy upgraded trailer like everyone else who wants those extras does.

Reply

erny h

6/27/2015 07:52:34 am

BLM has become such a worthless agency!! Greedy,because of our love for the festival!! Insincere and so dishonest when driving thru the playa!!

Reply

Robert

6/27/2015 08:53:10 am

I'd like to hear the BLM's side of the story before I sign any petition. On the surface their demands seem unreasonable but maybe there are good logistical reasons for providing them with more services. And so what if their luxuries are above and beyond what festival goers have? That's not the point. They are Land Management. They're not there to party, they're there to... well, manage!

Also, considering what a privilege it is to even be able to have the financial and material resources to go to Burning Man as a ticket holder, I find the complaints about BLM luxuries rather ironic. Check your privilege, people.

Reply

Beverly

6/28/2015 05:27:01 am

Well... if they aren't here to party and are here to manage, then the 24 hour ice cream at least should be able to be left behind, right? Some things here just don't seem sensible. I've never needed ice cream to do my job.

I agree it is not about comparing them to burner facilities. But less than 90 days notice of an additional $1M fee is ridiculous in and of itself.

I used to work for federal budgeting. The manpower and logistics for a month on the playa is not $4M. They already have a big cushion for expenses.

Reply

Randy Phillips

6/29/2015 12:34:38 am

There is a term for it. "Black Mail " They know the tickets have been sold so now they think they can get the Org to bend over so they can stick it to them. If this was something that they would bring up at least one year in advance I would not be nearly as pissed. still pissed but at least there would be time to negotiate and get all the facts out in the open.

Athanor

6/27/2015 09:29:48 am

Notice also that the 150 BLM employees that are actually working will continue to live in much more reasonable lodgings. With the fees already as high as they are, if they really needed better facilities, they should provide them out of the millions Burning Man was already paying them.

Reply

Robert

6/27/2015 09:43:54 am

That would cut into Burning Man's profits. Hence the hissy fit and call for a petition.

Reply

Dr. Yes

6/27/2015 09:48:47 am

That petition was started by me. I'm not affiliated with Burning Man except as someone who goes every year.

We already pay about $57 each to the BLM ($4 million / 70,000 people), and now they're asking us to fork over another ~$15 each. That's what it'll come down to too: We're the ones who will pay for their 24 hour ice cream freezer.

Jason

6/27/2015 04:13:13 pm

Ridiculous! The BLM is already paid for by our taxes, AND paid for by our permitting fee. Now to do their jobs they want us to pay more to give them luxuries? It's supposedly their job, not their vacation to the land of candy and ice cream.

Here's the letter I just sent, in case anyone wants to borrow any of it.

Dear Secretary Jewell,

I'm writing to express my respectful concern about the BLM's recent request for housing accommodations at the 2015 Burning Man festival. While I understand and appreciate the demands of the job that the BLM Rangers perform at the annual event, the extravagance and scope of the request recently filed by Agent Daniel Love and his department strikes me as unusual and in need of attention.

I am a native Nevadan. I was born and raised in Reno, and spent a good deal of my youth exploring the wonderful landscape of the Great Basin. I have a strong appreciation for the beauty and fragility of the high desert, and am extremely grateful for the tireless--and, unfortunately, often thankless--work that the BLM does to protect Nevada's unique and fragile ecosystem. They play an essential role in safeguarding the environment I love for future generations to enjoy, and I applaud them. Thank you for the part you play in protecting our public lands.

I've been attending the Burning Man festival since 2004, and have experienced the event's growing pains along with it. As participation has soared over the last 10 years, so too has the need for careful oversight. While I love Black Rock City (BRC) intensely, I love the natural environment of the Black Rock Desert even more. I recognize the essential importance of BLM participation in the event, and in my experience the BLM officers discharge their responsibility with admirable attention and care. I am a volunteer Black Rock Ranger during the event, and my interactions with the BLM staff have been unfailingly positive. In the past, my fellow Rangers, BRC citizens, and BLM officers have worked together to ensure that the event is safe, fun, and without lasting impact on the playa. I wish to see this partnership continue, which is precisely the source of my concern.

Agent Love's recent requests for luxury accommodations on the playa puts this partnership at risk, and places unprecedented strain on the non-profit entity responsible for organizing and managing Burning Man. The monetary expense associated with the request--cited as $1,000,000--represents a 25% increase over the full cost of permits and fees levied against the Burning Man event in 2014; just the increase itself comes to more than the entire cost of event permits and fees in 2011. This is a substantial expense, and one that has the Burning Man community understandably concerned.

More important than the magnitude of the new costs, though, is the use to which those funds are being put. Agent Love's request includes accommodations that rival those of high-end hotels, and luxuries that are extreme, unprecedented, and far beyond those that could possibly construed as necessary for BLM officers assigned to work the event. I believe that the vast majority of Burning Man participants would be delighted to provide the funds necessary to safeguard the desert and ensure the safety of everyone at the event, but it's not at all clear to me how the level of luxury requested by Agent Love contributes to that goal. Rather, it seems like the request is more about ensuring the perfect comfort of "VIPs" and high ranking BLM officials.

I worry that this is not the most efficient use of permit funds. Just as importantly, I worry that proceeding with this plan will erode the trust and mutual respect between participants and BLM officers. I certainly understand the need for officers working the event to be rested, focused, and prepared to do the essential job that they must do in order for the event to succeed, but this request seems to go far beyond what is necessary to meet those goals, particularly considering the fact that the requested facility seems designed to accommodate visitors more than the actual officers working the event.

I'm concerned that the timing and magnitude of the request, which is expressed as a precondition on obtaining the requisite BLM permits, may be construed by the community as an attempt on the part of the BLM administration to leverage their authority as a regulatory body to secure luxury accommodations for themselves and their guests. Accurate or not, that perception is likely to irreparably damage the relationship between BLM officers and the Burning Man community. In the end, that would make it much more difficult for all of us to accomplish our shared goal of protecting the environment of the Black Rock Desert.

I ask that you reconsider whether or not the requested facilities are in fact essential for the BLM officers to do their jobs, or if the requested funds might be put to a better, more efficient use elsewhere. All of us are on the same team here, and we all have the same goal: a safe, fun, low impact Burning Man festival. In the past, we have all worked together to meet this goal, and to make Burning Man the kind of community and project that all of us can be proud of. I sincerely hope we can cont

Frankly - This is EXACTLY the way I felt when the BMORG started changing the rules, seemingly to produce more revenue, rather than produce more services. From things I read recently, the Radical SELF-Reliance has disappeared behind the rows of 'motel' yurts, octogons, and private jets from SF airport. It has become more of a business to make a profit, than freedom FROM that. It looks like the BLM is seeing it and acting accordingly. IT AIN'T PERSONAL -- IT IS JUST BUSINESS.

Reply

K

6/28/2015 03:19:51 am

Is this any surprise? Every gathering like this of any sorts always starts out with original vibes over the years it grows and more and more people and circles and groups come in. The vibe of the whole event has to become generalized for the greater group. Much like a small mom and pop business that turns into corporation. Eventually people cant relate to it genuinely. It just becomes a stereotype and in this case a business. It happens EVERY single time. There is no surprise or shock here. There isnt even disappointment because I had no expectations of anything else happening.

The most genuine things are only genuine for a moment then the vibe becomes capitalized upon. As soon as people start to advertise it as being genuine experience to others it loses its touch because people come into it with certain expectations of experience. Whats genuine spontaneously happens with no expectations of its feeling. Yhe first burning man was the most genuine. Every one since has very slowly drifted. Now its just happening exponentially.

You want something authentic? Go start or be a part of something with only a few thousand people.

The burning mans dead. Every year I hesr things about it getting worse and worse. More problems more vips partying in absurd luxury (thats relative and not a fsir statement) the arrival of different classes due to these vips (as subjectively reported by many others)

It just sounds like today a big party with a bunch of hippies (im a hippy but the bad stereotype is to prove a point about its vibe not to insult anyone)

And for the outrageous costs id rather do something else like go travel to south america and visit mayan temples, maybe drink some ayauasca

Reply

VerybadSanta

6/28/2015 03:47:24 am

The vibe of the whole event has to become generalized for the greater group. Much like a small mom and pop business that turns into corporation. Eventually people cant relate to it genuinely. It just becomes a stereotype and in this case a business. It happens EVERY single time. There is no surprise or shock here. There isnt even disappointment because I had no expectations of anything else happening.

The difference IS that the Mom & Pop business was started to make money. BM was started to make friends and keep commercialism OUT. Well, until they started selling coffee and Ice.
If they had maintained the initial idea -- what would likely have happened? The event would grow to a point, before it reached a peak attendance and following. Maintaining the original principles would PROBABLY mean after the peak, the numbers would become more manageable, as fewer people would attend -- but there would not be any compromise of the original premise.
When the GOAL became making it bigger and bigger to attract MORE people and MORE money, it was beginning to die.

Reply

HeLix

6/28/2015 01:30:38 pm

There was vending in BRC well into the 90's. There have been coffee and ice sales since that time. I'm not sure what nostalgic Burning Man of old you are referring to but it isn't one based in reality.

As Burning Man becomes more popular, the risks become higher and the costs become higher. The Org can't get away with some of the amateur shit like they used to. Especially with groups like the BLM putting a ton of pressure on 'em.

I have no doubt Burning Man wants to attract more people but I doubt it is about more money. Maybe they are trying to include more people? Yeah, that's totally against the principles.

Reply

K

6/28/2015 04:06:51 am

Your right, point still stands however. Its unfortunate but it is what it is. I will be saving my money and not attending.

Reply

VerybadSanta

6/28/2015 04:37:47 am

Hope to begin checking out some of the Regionals, as they have not been corrupted.

Reply

Randy Phillips

6/29/2015 12:39:41 am

I have attended a regional for a few years and will continue. Burning Man is now priced out of my zone. I go to the E11 and for this year and probably for a few to come I can make the round trip on one tank of fuel. Much less than BM.

Beverly

6/28/2015 05:31:51 am

The funny thing is that the "no brown M&M's" Van Halen contract referred to was about ensuring safety. They had a lot of specifications about the stage and other safety requirements in the contract, but they'd go places and find out some people had built everything to contract and other's hadn't, which meant they spent tons of time trying to ensure everything was built to contract. They added the no brown M&M's clause so they could see... at a glance... if the venue was reading and following the contract. If there weren't brown M&M's they didn't have to look as much at the way things were constructed. If there were brown M&Ms then they had to look at every detail themselves to ensure everyone's safety.

I just can't see that the requirement for ice cream could possibly be serving the same reason.

This is not coming from patrol level Rangers, they are fine heading back into Bruno's for ice cream and laundry.

This is solely about SAIC Dan Love and his ego. I'm not sure if he's not completely lost his mind.

If he submitted a 25% increase in budget to his higher ups, 3 months prior to the end of the fiscal year, he would get his proverbial ass kicked for his piss poor planning and his arrogance even putting it in writing.

Tickets were already sold, a budget created 11 months ago. Bringing it up at this point is an attempt to assert power. This man is a fucking nutbar.

Reply

Dr. Yes

6/28/2015 07:54:25 am

Yes, exactly.

Reply

Randy Phillips

6/29/2015 12:45:32 am

Having read some about Dan Love the past few days makes one wonder about just how bad things are in the BLM.

Reply

Peter Shankman

6/28/2015 07:56:52 am

You got the Van Halen story wrong. Their set was heavier than most stages could handle, and they needed specific non-regular anchors for it. They knew if they saw blue m&m's, the house didn't read the rider and the band would be performing on a dangerous stage.

Reply

Dr. Yes

6/28/2015 07:59:48 am

Unsure what I got wrong! All I said was that it is probably the most infamous rider for a concert of all time and that they didn't want brown M&Ms. I think both are true!

(Here's the link to excerpts from that rider: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/backstage/hall-fame/van-halen-82)

Reply

Brooks

6/28/2015 10:49:38 am

Just cancel the event this year....don't give BLM anything...pack up and go home. Refund the tickets and start over next year. In other words: last minute their last minute.
Now THAT would be art!

We all have spent a few million dollars on the event. It is not just the ticket refund.

Don't cancel the event to teach a lesson, that's so childish. Say no to the request and tell them to resubmit new budget requests in a timely manner. Let BLM deny the permit, but they won't. Nevada and local towns and BLM depend on the burn.

Reply

VerybadSanta

6/29/2015 02:35:25 am

Brooks - I was thinking the same thing, but hadn't figured out how to word it properly.
I would imagine that the money 'saved' could pay for the completion of the various projects under construction, like temples and such, their storage until next year and possible the NEXT LOCATION.
As for a location in Nevada, assuming they want to stay there, Winnamucca and Lovelock have a lot of undeveloped acreage FOR SALE for less than the $1M. I wonder what the AVERAGE footprint has been over the years?

Reply

kellyk

6/29/2015 09:46:32 am

For the record, I am against the BLM's last-minute extortive demands. However, here's a radical idea for thought: Why not connect the BLM VIPs with one of the (surviving) concierge camps? Twelve VIPs at $10k pp and they receive fantastic amenities and it costs the event just $120k.

Reply

Dr. Yes

6/29/2015 10:02:08 am

I'm fairly sure none of the plug n' play camps are up to the requirements of the BLM. Caravansicle wasn't, based on what I've read about it, for instance. Also, for whatever reason (I can guess a few), the BLM's requested compound is about 2 miles down the road from the playa - ie not even in Black Rock City.

Reply

Croneberg

6/30/2015 09:59:27 pm

If you want to save the event, ask BLM to sack the thug known as SAIC Dan Love. Its that simple.

Reply

Leave a Reply.

Author

I'm Dr. Yes, a 9 year burner. I run this site, was on the '15 Temple team, and lead a theme camp called Friendgasm. Just say yes, folks!

Categories

Please like the Burn.Life FB page to get BM info, news, opinion pieces, and more.

I'm Dr. Yes, a fan of Burning Man, Burners, and Burner culture.

Burn.Life is a non-commercial, hobbyist website and no commerce, ads, paid endorsements are involved. Any products mentioned or linked to are done so because I or people I trust have used them and I view them as reasonable recommendations. You can email me here: yes (-at-) burn (-dot-) life.