"In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell, Author
.....
"All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First: It Is Ridiculed, Second: It Is Violently Opposed, And Third: It Is
Accepted As Self-Evident" – Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

The war in Afghanistan is lost. That is a fact and there is absolutely nothing now that can change that fact. The United States and its NATO allies are embroiled in that war for only one purpose... To protect the Opium producing Poppies from harm and to make sure that the Opium is shipped out of that country for markets worldwide. This shows clearly that our forces are fighting on the wrong, or the evil, side of this war. With absolutely no moral justification for this war, these troops should be withdrawn as quickly as possible to allow the Afghan people their absolute rights for determining their own future.

We are subjugated constantly to the reports from the Zionist controlled media giving us absolutely false reports from Afghanistan. Little truth about the fighting and the status of Afghanistan and its people are available through these BS media outlets.

However, there is still online sources that give us a clear picture of the Afghanistan war. One new article is from the website: www.uruknet.info, and it comes from the Taliban freedom fighters. It gives us more truthful information in this one article than all of the BS from our so called "media" outlets, and I want to present that article here for all of my own readers:

Afghan resistance statementDoes America Want Peace in Afghanistan?

Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

March 30, 2010

This is a main question every one asks. Does America want peace in Afghanistan? However, the following data can help us reach a rationale conclusion: At the beginning of 2009, American had 30,000 troops in Afghanistan which they increased to 68,000 soldiers until the end of the year. This shows 110 percent boost of military man power. In December 2009, US president Obama announced 30,000 more troops for Afghanistan, showing further 30% increase. In January this year in London Conference on Afghanistan, US supported Hamid Karzai program of reintegration and reconciliation with Taliban i.e. the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Two weeks later, on 13 February, Pentagon launched a massive military operations against Marjah township in Nad Ali district, Helmand province, violating their own commitment to work for peace in the country. Now they are talking of taking the offensive to Kandahar.

So far, America has built 700 bases in the country, the major of them being in Kandahar and Bagram. They allocate hundreds of millions of dollars each year for construction of more bases in Afghanistan. In view of these facts, no one can say America wants peace in Afghanistan. They have hidden and long-term colonialist objectives, not only in Afghanistan but in the whole region.

By using Afghanistan as outpost, Washington wants to follows its policy of expansionism, regime change and disintegration in the neighboring countries. No doubt, America has been flaring up racial discord and religious differences among the people in Afghanistan and the neighboring countries. CIA agents and black water operatives have been given task to destabilize the region as per the long-term American strategy. Those who express common cause with America, should know that Washington would never become their strategic friend. Rather it is a tactical ally which wants to use them against their own people for its colonialist objectives and then discard them as it has done this in the past.

In Afghanistan, the White House rulers and the Pentagon generals do not want peace but only want to weaken the momentum of the war. They never intend to end the war. That is why on the one hand, Robert Gates, says Taliban leadership is irreconcilable or now it is not the right time to talk with Taliban but on the other hand, they offer cash, jobs and retirement bonuses for Taliban's ranks and files. The reason is that Pentagon is not interested in ending the war but they only want to reduce the scope of attacks on their soldiers.

The Afghan Mujahideen are aware of this war stratagem of the enemy. They have shown that Americans can't deceive them by phony overtures of peace. If America really wants peace in Afghanistan, they should draw up a national strategy of reconciliation,; stop blind bombardment and night raids; release innocent prisoners and remove the blacks list, send black water and CIA agents back home from Afghanistan and close down all secret prisons in American military bases in Afghanistan which are run by intelligence teams of the Special Force. There, innocent prisoners are tortured, killed by the Special Force and drowned in Helmand River and other rivers in Afghanistan during the night, with their hands being tied up, without any legal verdict of court. The Americans are committing gross violation of human rights in Afghanistan. However, no one, including the human rights advocacy entities all over the world, raise their fingers because all these are done under the name of promoting democracy and fighting terrorism. The world still has to know that the war started under the name of terrorism is , in fact, an illegitimate war of neo-colonialism, being waged for subjugation of the Afghans and all free people.

We call on all those with wake and free conscience to raise their voice against the American brutalities and violation of humane values in Afghanistan. All should know that Americans kill children, women and old men with impunity and cross all limits in their brutalities.

:: Article nr. 64658 sent on 30-mar-2010 22:34 ECTwww.uruknet.info?p=64658NTS Notes: There may be some distortions in this report, definitely. However this pales in comparison to the BS that we are given constantly from news services such as CNN, and MSNBC, and that is a fact!

The message is clear in this report from "the other side". These freedom fighters want the foreign occupiers out of their country, and that is the right of any resistance movement that wants freedom for its people.

Again, the war in Afghanistan is lost and we are fighting for all the wrong reasons, and are definitely not on the side of moral justice and international law. Its time to get the troops out and bring them home... That time is NOW!

Monday, March 29, 2010

We have just witnessed the farce that was the so called "split" between the Zionist state of Israel, and their puppets in the United States. I can assure all of my readers with 100% certainty right here and right now that this was nothing but a charade to try to convince the ever growing pessimistic American public that America does not bow down to Israel. The truth is that it is business as usual, where America is shipping arms and money to their Zionist masters, while Americans are now destitute and starving in the streets of America itself.

Now the Zionists are gearing up rapidly in getting their puppets in America to launch their newest bloody war of aggression against the innocent nation of Iran. The United States just sent a shipment of their bunker busting bombs to their base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, and is preparing for the newest "false flag" attack on America (which will be done by the Mossad of course) just so that they can blame Iran and fool the American public into supporting a new war for the criminal state of Israel.

Just to show how the MSM rhetoric is still going nonstop in America in trying to convince the public that a war against Iran is just around the corner, I came across the following article from www.heraldscotland.com that asks the question: Are America's Hawks Really Preparing To Swoop On Iran? It is very good reading, and I want to present it here in its entirety for my own readers:

Are America’s hawks really preparing to swoop on Iran?

Published on 25 Mar 2010

Bomb Iran before it’s too late. Such is the prevalent thinking in certain political quarters over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.

Once again, these are dangerous times in the Middle East. In the past week alone, there has been an ominous hardening of language and resolve in Washington and elsewhere over Iran’s capacity to produce nuclear weapons.

According to some experts, Iran could have a nuclear warhead as early as the middle of next year and a missile in less than five. Should we be worried? Yes, is the obvious answer. Globally, the growing concern is now palpable and some proposed solu- tions for bringing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s regime to heel are no less scary than the idea of him having the bomb in the first place.

This week speaker after speaker at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conference in Washington made the case that the White House should substantially turn up the pressure on, if not place itself on an effective war footing with, Tehran. Admittedly, to some extent this was to be expected, coming as it did from the heart of America’s pro-Israel lobby. Having said that, even by their own hawkish standards, there was a real sense of menace in the tone of the conference. At times this year’s AIPAC pow-wow almost felt like a council of war. Perhaps the scariest thing of all was that many of the guest US Congressmen were among the most bellicose.

“All options must be on the table” and “you know exactly what I’m talking about”, said Republican Senator Lindsay Graham of South Carolina. Like most of those who spoke on the Iran issue, Graham pulled no punches, insisting that if military strikes were initiated, they should not simply target Iran’s nuclear infrastructure but should effectively lay the country to waste, rendering it incapable of any military response whatsoever. “They should not have one plane that can fly or one ship that can float,” was Graham’s apocalyptic conclusion.

Even among more mainstream US political thinking, the “bomb Iran” lobby is gaining momentum.

In a New York Times opinion piece this month, the writer pointed out: “With Iran’s nuclear clock ticking and its people suffering, the world must understand that America’s patience is limited and the time to wait is coming to an end.”

Iranian people suffering? Well, bombing Tehran into oblivion is really going to help alleviate that.

But, hey, look on the positive side, at least American “impatience” would be salved.

What is truly terrifying about all of this is that evidence already exists that US preparations for a military strike appear quite advanced. In the past few weeks, my colleague Rob Edwards reported, in the Sunday Herald, how hundreds of powerful US “bunker-buster” bombs are being shipped from California to the British island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean in preparation for a possible attack on Iran.

His story revealed that the US government signed a contract in January to transport 10 ammunition containers to the island. According to a cargo manifest from the US Navy, this included 387 “Blu” bombs used for blasting hardened or underground structures.

A shipping company based in Florida, Superior Maritime Services, will be paid $699,500 to transport many thousands of military items from Concord, California, to Diego Garcia.

“They are gearing up totally for the destruction of Iran,” said Dan Plesch, director of the Centre for International Studies at the University of London, who was quoted in the article. According to Plesch, author of a recent study on US preparations for an attack on Iran, US bombers “are ready today to destroy 10,000 targets in Iran in a few hours”.

Not known for sitting on its own hands when faced with a threat, Israel itself, of course, might very well beat its erstwhile ally to the punch. I well recall how, in 1991, following a few nights of Iraqi Scud missile attacks on Tel Aviv, I went to a morning press conference at which a journalist asked an Israeli military spokesman what their response would be if any of the Iraqi missiles contained chemical or biological weapons.

“We would turn Baghdad into a sheet of glass,” came the Israeli officer’s instant and chilling reply. For a long time now within the Israeli military and political establishment there has been a prevailing consensus that the country’s security depends on its ability to use military force unilaterally in the Middle East as and when the need arises.

Living within easy reach of Iranian missile threat, and faced with the loose cannon that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad undoubtedly is, one can understand Israel’s unease. Many, of course, believe that for Israel to attack Iran it would first require a green light from the Pentagon. Readers familiar with my take on Israeli policy will know that this is not a view I would readily subscribe to.

One need only think back to Operation Babylon, the surprise 1981 Israeli air strike on the Iraqi nuclear reactor being built in Osirak. Israel’s take then was “let’s do it and the world be damned”. For a while there was some international outrage, but what quickly followed in some quarters were a few discreet nods of approval acknowledging Israel’s assertion that it had prevented Saddam Hussein from developing “real” weapons of mass destruction.

Since then, far from letting down its guard, Israel has stepped up both its covert and open preparations for any showdown with an Iranian regime seemingly hell-bent on having a nuclear big stick of its own.

Ahmadinejad has, of course, been doing some sabre-rattling himself. Only yesterday, he was insisting that the “days of hurting the Iranian nation were over” and that the west would be unable to stop “the fast-speeding train of Iranian progress”.

Unthinkable as war against Iran might seem under an Obama administration, only recently the US President again strongly reiterated that a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable. What’s more, like it or not, Obama inherited a US military machine whose plans for war against Iran had been well advanced under the Bush administration.

For the time being at least, and to that end, “crippling sanctions”, regime change and an all-out military strike still appear to be options on the table.

Alternatively, if a rational way out of the stand-off with Iran is to be found, then Washington and the international community will need to take a fresh look at their role in brokering peace, not just on the issue of Iran, but on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict and Middle East as a whole.

In the worst case scenario, those bunker-busters might yet be dropped on Tehran. Then again, maybe just for once, those who make such decisions might see sense and realise the world already has enough madness to contend with.

DAVID PRATT

NTS Notes: The answer to the question put forward in this article's header is YES! The Zionists are now working round the clock and using their media to brainwash Americans falsely that Iran is a threat. As noted in this article, The bunker busting weapons have now been delivered to Diego Garcia and these criminals are now waiting for something to happen, which will most probably be a Mossad false flag attack, so that they can be launched against Iran!

People must understand that the real threat in the Middle East is the criminal state of Israel with its hundreds of Nuclear Weapons, and NOT the state of Iran which does not possess even ONE nuclear weapon to this date. That information is again sadly missing in the Zionist controlled media. Therefore it is again up to the bloggers in the Internet community to get the real truth out!

Now as a follow-up to those interviews, Ognir at the Information Underground (http://www.theinfounderground.com) has just conducted an important Conference call interview between himself, Darryl Bradford Smith from The French Connection (http://www.iamthewitness.com), and Dr Alan Sabrosky. It is an excellent interview, and I want to present the link right here for everyone to listen to closely:

NTS Notes: Another important link that all readers should copy, paste, email, etc, and spread around quickly. The Zionists are now working overtime in trying to suppress this revelation that they are fully responsible for the mass murder of 9-11. It is up to us, over the Internet, to get the truth out!

I wish to thank both Darryl Bradford Smith, and Ognir, for their tireless efforts in getting the truth about our sick world out to all listeners and readers at their sites. Take a look closely at their work, readers, and especially at all of the audio files. They are very informative and very revealing!

Israel did 9-11. It is time for people everywhere to know that truth and to finally unite against their criminality. That time is NOW!

Some people have criticized me for my constant slamming of the United States for its constant pandering to its masters in Israel. It is a known fact by now by all of my readers who take the time to research everything presented that the United States is firmly in control of Zionists, and that nation is basically Israeli occupied territory.

It is also a known fact that Canada is just as bad as the United States, when it comes to pandering to Israel, if not far worse. The Canadian government in Ottawa definitely does not answer to the Canadian people, and gets its orders from Zionist groups, who demand that the Harper government obeys commands coming from Tel Aviv first and foremost!

Now, a former Canadian diplomat has come forward to slam the Zionist Harper government for its Pro-Israeli foreign policy. Here is an article from the Canadian online news service: www.nationalpost.com that explains these latest comments by former diplomat, Robert Fowler in great detail:

Former diplomat slams Harper’s foreign policy

David Akin, Canwest News Service

Published: Sunday, March 28, 2010

Moustapha Diallo/ReutersFormer diplomat Robert Fowler in April 2009.

MONTREAL -- Former Canadian diplomat Robert Fowler has slammed Prime Minister Stephen Harper's foreign policy, accusing the Conservatives of pandering to Canadian Jewish voters with a "reckless" Middle East policy that blindly favours Israel.

He also says Canada does not deserve a seat on the United Nations Security Council; that the Afghanistan mission is doomed to failure; and that Canadian politicians -- Conservatives and Liberals -- set their foreign-policy goals only to "corner the ethnic vote" in Canada.

"The world does not need more of the kind of Canada they have been getting," Mr. Fowler said in a speech in Montreal on Sunday. "Canadian governments have turned inward and adopted ‘me first' stances across the international agenda; and Canada's reputation and proud international traditions have been diminished as a result."

Mr. Fowler made his remarks at a weekend "thinkers" conference organized by the Liberal Party of Canada, with Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff and former prime minister Paul Martin looking on.

He was brutal in his assessment of the Conservative government's foreign policy.

He said the Conservatives must "accept the reality and importance of the ironclad link between . . . continuing turmoil and volatility in the Middle East and the rise [and] growing strength of international terrorism."

But, he said, doing that means confronting Israel, as it "builds ever more settlements in illegally occupied territories in contravention of a myriad of international judgments."

He said Canadian politicians -- and here he seemed to suggest both Liberal and Conservative politicians -- refuse to acknowledge that reality for fear of being labelled anti-Semitic.

"It is there for all to see, but apparently politically incorrect to draw attention to it."

Moreover, he accused Canadian politicians of formulating foreign policy, on the Middle East and on other issues, only with a view to winning votes and scoring political points at home.

He said politicians are merely engaged in "the scramble to lock up the Jewish vote in Canada [and] selling out our widely admired and long-established reputation for fairness and justice. I have no reason to love Islamic extremism or indeed terrorism of any stripe, jihadi or political, but I do deplore the abandonment of our hard-won reputation for objective analysis and decency as a result of our reckless Middle Eastern posturing."

Mr. Fowler speaks with considerable experience in foreign affairs. Not only was he a civil servant for 38 years, he was the foreign policy adviser to prime ministers Trudeau, Turner and Mulroney; he was Canada's longest-serving ambassador at the United Nations; and he was the personal representative for Africa for prime ministers Chretien, Martin and Harper.

In 2008, while representing United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in Africa, he was captured and held hostage by al-Qaida for 130 days. He now teaches at the University of Ottawa.

Mr. Ignatieff said Sunday he has always stood for a two-state solution in the Middle East and rejected accusations of pandering.

"The Canadian consensus -- and it is a consensus, darn it -- is two states between two free peoples, living side by side with international recognition and international security guarantees," said Mr. Ignatieff. "I say that in every room I go into. I don't chop it. I don't change it."

"Look only at Liberal politicians falling over themselves to celebrate supporters in Toronto of the Tamil Tigers, one of the world's more unpleasant terrorist organizations," Mr. Fowler said.

"Or consider the ethical and international implications of politicians of all parties attending the Surrey, B.C., spring parades to mark the anniversary of the Sikh religion, where photographs of Sikh terrorists, like the leaders of the Air India bomb plot and Free Khalistan separatists, are prominently displayed and venerated."

While he praised the key foreign policy initiatives of Pearson, Trudeau, Mulroney and Chretien, Mr. Fowler was withering in his assessment of Harper's approach to world affairs, suggesting that, because of the Conservative approach, the world is becoming increasingly suspicious and distrustful of a Canada that has increasingly turned away from the world.

Canada will vie with Germany and Portugal to win one of the two seats on the United Nations Security Council 2011-12. Mr. Fowler said Canadians should not assume the rest of the world wants Canada to win that race.

"If we win, it will not be because we have contributed much to the effective management of world affairs over recent years, because we have not," Mr. Fowler said.

The Afghanistan mission, Mr. Fowler said, is doomed because neither Canadians nor its allies are prepared to pay the price, "in blood or treasure" to essentially colonize that country.

"The bottom line is: We will not prevail in Afghanistan," Mr. Fowler said. "We are simply not prepared to foot the massive price in blood and treasure, which it would take to effectively colonize Afghanistan -- the least fortunate country in the world -- and replace their culture with ours, for that seems to be what we seek, and with the Taliban share that view."

Mr. Fowler argued that Canadian troops should immediately withdraw from that country. "It is time to leave. Not a moment, not a life, and not a dollar, later."

NTS Notes: Again, Canada used to pride itself on being probably the most free nation on the planet, and other nations used to look upon Canada as a model for their own quest for freedom and democracy. Now nations can see Canada for what it has become: Another Zionist Occupied Nation that bows down to Israel first!

When will the Canadian people finally turn against the Harper government for its Pro-Israeli stance? That time is long overdue....

Sunday, March 28, 2010

We have been watching the media circus take place where it is claimed that there is a "rift" between the United States and their master, Israel, due to the Israeli Settlement building in the occupied territories. That is a farce, because the United States just blocked a new UN resolution against the criminal state of Israel, and the United States military just ok'ed a new shipment of arms to Israel. The fact is that this so called "rift" is nothing but a ruse and a massive media lie, so that when the United States attacks Iran, Israel will be pictured as staying on the sidelines!

Now we have a new article from the Associated Free Press, that I found through the website: www.rawstory.com, that says that Israel is blaming the Palestinians for blocking the US sponsored "Peace Plan". This is so absolutely ridiculous and an absurd travesty, that I knew after reading it, it belonged in my Files Of Absurdity for the absolutely ridiculous claim made by the Zionists. Here is the article:

Israel blames Palestinians for blocking US peace efforts

Published: Sunday March 28, 2010

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has infuriated Washington with plans to expand settlements in east Jerusalem, on Sunday accused the Palestinians of blocking US peace efforts.

His remarks came after the Palestinians reiterated their refusal to hold even indirect talks without a complete Jewish settlement freeze and following a flare-up of violence in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

"We continue to see that the Palestinians are hardening their positions. They do not show any sign of moderation," Netanyahu said at the start of a weekly cabinet meeting.

Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas has ruled out holding any talks with Israel unless it freezes settlement construction in the West Bank including mostly Arab east Jerusalem, seized and annexed by Israel in 1967.

On Sunday Arab leaders backed his position in a concluding statement of a two-day summit in Libya attended by 14 of the 22 members of the Arab League.

"The resumption of Palestinian-Israeli negotiations demands that Israel implements its legal commitments by stopping all settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, including east Jerusalem," they said.

The statement insisted "on the need to have a timeframe for these negotiations and that they resume from where they left off and on the basis of what has been agreed upon in the peace process."

The statement also urged US President Barack Obama to keep up "his initial and key position" to work to halt Israeli settlement growth.

The impasse comes amid a surge of violence in Gaza, where two Israeli soldiers and, according to medics, one Palestinian, were killed on Friday in the deadliest clashes since Israel's 22-day war on Hamas ended in January 2009.

Another Palestinian was killed when tanks moved into the same area the next day, and witnesses said Israeli forces were conducting a limited operation there on Sunday, though no clashes or casualties were reported.

A minister from Netanyahu's rightwing Likud party, meanwhile, warned on Sunday that Israel would eventually "liquidate" Gaza's Hamas rulers, who seized control of the territory after routing Abbas's forces in June 2007.

"I am not setting a timetable, but we will not tolerate this regime continuing to strengthen itself militarily," Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz told Israeli public radio.

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhum said Steinitz's remarks "reflect the criminal intentions of the Zionist occupation government and confirm its continuing acts of state terrorism."

Earlier this month, Abbas reluctantly agreed to US-mediated indirect talks with Israel but the planned negotiations collapsed two days later when Israel announced plans to build 1,600 new settler homes in east Jerusalem during a visit by US Vice President Joe Biden.

The project set off a major diplomatic crisis with the United States.

A minister from the centre-left Labour party said on Sunday it would meet next week to discuss quitting the rightwing-led coalition, a move that would leave Netanyahu with a razor-thin majority of 61 seats in the 120-member parliament.

Netanyahu has refused to halt construction in east Jerusalem, which Israel views as part of its "eternal, undivided" capital. No other government recognises its claim to the eastern sector of the city.

The premier imposed a 10-month halt on new construction in the West Bank in November, but the move was rejected by the Palestinians because it did not include east Jerusalem, public buildings and projects already under way.

A half million Israelis live in more than 120 settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, including some 200,000 Jews living in east Jerusalem alongside about 270,000 Arabs.

Israel said it would restrict access to its territory from the West Bank for the week-long Jewish Passover holiday, which begins at sunset on Monday.

But in a bizarre incident, a group of Palestinian, Israeli and foreign activists who marched to a checkpoint outside Jerusalem to protest the closures walked through waving Palestinian flags and towing a donkey and a horse.

The soldiers manning the checkpoint were apparently caught off guard, as were Israeli police, who scrambled to escort them back to the West Bank.

NTS Notes: So let me get this straight.... Israel is actually accelerating their stealing of land in the occupied territories, has launched a new bloody attack on the Gaza Strip, and is in the process of annexing all of Jerusalem, and yet their evil Prime Minister now claims that the Palestinians are blocking the peace efforts? Am I missing something here?

Absolutely insane, and absolutely absurd indeed. People must understand that Israel wants all of Palestine and they do not give a damn about the Palestinian people at all. Israel is a criminal state that cares not about others, and has even now been found fully responsible now even for attacks on their slaves in the United States on 9-11. When will the world rise up against these monsters?

Saturday, March 27, 2010

My topics cover a vast multitude of subjects. People know that I have been after criminal Zionism, and their criminal state of Israel, for a very long time and was one who fingered Israel for the attacks of 9-11 very early on. Others have noted my attacks on corrupt government, and who controls governments (hint: It is NOT the people who actually vote for them!). I have also been all over the Apollo Moon Hoax for a lot longer than when I first launched my blogs over the net, knowing full well that NASA has been lying to people for over 40 years now, and that we have NEVER put men on the moon to this day! My other blogs cover health concerns, and how we are being weakened by the poisons introduced into our environments and our own foods.

Right now, I want to cover again the importance of taking Vitamin D supplements for our better health. For months I proposed that people do NOT take any vaccines against the Flu, but instead reinforce their body's own defences and better health by taking up to 5000 IU of Vitamin D, especially during winter months, when our exposure to natural sunlight is restricted. Right here and right now, I want to present another article that backs up many claims about the importance of Vitamin D, including my own research. It comes from the Times Online News Service at www.timesonline.co.uk, and is a must read. Here is that article:

From The Times

March 27, 2010

Top up Vitamin D in the sun or pop a supplement, say researchers

David Rose, Health Correspondent

Britons should not shy away from sunshine in summer and should take a daily supplement of vitamin D in winter in order to address serious levels of deficiency, experts say.

Leading doctors and researchers said that more than 60 per cent of the population have “sub-optimal” levels of the vitamin, with the problem being worse in Scotland, the North of England and among ethnic minorities.

Ahead of a major conference on vitamin D and health in London next week, they said people are putting their health at risk because they spend too little time in the sun, possibly because of fears over skin cancer.

Vitamin D, produced naturally when the skin is exposed to sunlight, plays a key role in strengthening bones and can help prevent fractures in the elderly. But there is emerging evidence that it can help prevent a range of other conditions, including asthma, type 2 diabetes and multiple sclerosis.

It is also found in a small number of foods, including oily fish, liver and egg yolks, and the Food Standards Agency (FSA) insists that “most people should be able to get all the vitamin D they need from their diet and by getting a little sun”.

Researchers from University College London and others said that everyone should get at least 15 minutes of sunshine a day, if necessary by postponing putting on sun cream until after they venture out.

They should also take a supplement from the autumn to April or May, to compensate for lack of sunshine during winter months.

Barbara Boucher, an emeritus researcher at Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, said that taking 10 micrograms (400 international units) of vitamin D each day could “do no harm” and would help raise blood levels of vitamin D.

But she criticised health supplement manufacturers for not providing affordable vitamin D-only pills. Most people can only buy multi-vitamin supplements, which may lead to them taking in too much vitamin A.

Dr Boucher added that concerns over skin cancer are also having an effect, because people fear spending too much time in the sun.

“You’ve not to be afraid of time in the sun,” she added. “Some people think five minutes in the sun will put ten or twenty years on their appearance and will give you ten melanomas. It isn’t quite like that.

“Melanoma is a deadly disease. We do worry so much, but it's sensible to be sensible about it. Don’t be afraid to have a moderate amount of sunshine so long as you don’t get burnt.”

Recent studies indicate that vitamin D supplements could help asthma sufferers who do not respond to the usual steroid treatment, while others say it can protect against bowel cancer and heart disease.

But Adrian Martineau, a doctor at Barts who is investigating how vitamin D might boost the body’s defences against tuberculosis, said that further trials were necessary before high-dose supplementation could be recommended.

The FSA said that only some groups of the population should take a supplement of 10 micrograms per day, including pregnant or breastfeeding women, elderly people and those who cover their skin a lot for cultural or religious reasons or who don’t get much sunlight.

NTS Notes: One of the reasons why people these days are in such poor health definitely does stem from our lack of natural sunlight exposure. There are many proponents that have always claimed that sitting in the sun is bad for our health, but I say that is BS. The fear of melanoma is noted in this article, but moderate exposure to sunlight will not harm you and can only contribute to your better health.

Articles such as this one only back up my long standing request that readers get out more and enjoy the sun! If you cannot get enough sunlight, then top off your Vitamin D intake with Vitamin D supplements for your better health.

Is it time to get out and purchase Vitamin D supplements? No time like the present....

Friday, March 26, 2010

America has a very rich history of both revolution and civil war. In each case, the people rose up against forces of oppression or against forces wanting to dissolve the Union. The result of each war has been a people more united than before, and a pride in standing up for freedom and democracy.

But what has happened in the last century is astounding. America is at a crossroads where evil forces of oppression and slavery (Zionism) is in total control of the Federal Government, and is guiding the American people into endless wars of oppression in foreign countries, and is leaving the entire nation on the verge of total economic collapse. The result could spell total enslavement of the people themselves!

How did America get to be in such terrible shape? And WHY have the people themselves not risen up in a new revolution to stop these evil forces of tyranny? Here is a great article from: www.alternet.org that sheds some light on this quandary and gives some very good reasons as to why Americans have become like sheep and unwilling or unable to rise up and take their own nation back from these Zionist criminals:

Are Americans a Broken People? Why We've Stopped Fighting Back Against the Forces of Oppression

A psychologist asks: Have consumerism, suburbanization and a malevolent corporate-government partnership so beaten us down that we no longer have the will to save ourselves?

December 11, 2009

Can people become so broken that truths of how they are being screwed do not "set them free" but instead further demoralize them? Has such a demoralization happened in the United States?

Do some totalitarians actually want us to hear how we have been screwed because they know that humiliating passivity in the face of obvious oppression will demoralize us even further?

What forces have created a demoralized, passive, dis-couraged U.S. population?

Can anything be done to turn this around?

Can people become so broken that truths of how they are being screwed do not "set them free" but instead further demoralize them?

Yes. It is called the "abuse syndrome." How do abusive pimps, spouses, bosses, corporations, and governments stay in control? They shove lies, emotional and physical abuses, and injustices in their victims' faces, and when victims are afraid to exit from these relationships, they get weaker. So the abuser then makes their victims eat even more lies, abuses, and injustices, resulting in victims even weaker as they remain in these relationships.

Does knowing the truth of their abuse set people free when they are deep in these abuse syndromes?

No. For victims of the abuse syndrome, the truth of their passive submission to humiliating oppression is more than embarrassing; it can feel shameful -- and there is nothing more painful than shame. When one already feels beaten down and demoralized, the likely response to the pain of shame is not constructive action, but more attempts to shut down or divert oneself from this pain. It is not likely that the truth of one's humiliating oppression is going to energize one to constructive actions.

Has such a demoralization happened in the U.S.?

In the United States, 47 million people are without health insurance, and many millions more are underinsured or a job layoff away from losing their coverage. But despite the current sellout by their elected officials to the insurance industry, there is no outpouring of millions of U.S. citizens on the streets of Washington, D.C., protesting this betrayal.

Polls show that the majority of Americans oppose U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as the taxpayer bailout of the financial industry, yet only a handful of U.S. citizens have protested these circumstances.

Remember the 2000 U.S. presidential election? That's the one in which Al Gore received 500,000 more votes than George W. Bush. That's also the one that the Florida Supreme Court's order for a recount of the disputed Florida vote was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court in a politicized 5-4 decision, of which dissenting Justice John Paul Stevens remarked: "Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law." Yet, even this provoked few demonstrators.

When people become broken, they cannot act on truths of injustice. Furthermore, when people have become broken, more truths about how they have been victimized can lead to shame about how they have allowed it. And shame, like fear, is one more way we become even more psychologically broken.

U.S. citizens do not actively protest obvious injustices for the same reasons that people cannot leave their abusive spouses: They feel helpless to effect change. The more we don't act, the weaker we get. And ultimately to deal with the painful humiliation over inaction in the face of an oppressor, we move to shut-down mode and use escape strategies such as depression, substance abuse, and other diversions, which further keep us from acting. This is the vicious cycle of all abuse syndromes.

Do some totalitarians actually want us to hear how we have been screwed because they know that humiliating passivity in the face of obvious oppression will demoralize us even further?

Maybe.

Shortly before the 2000 U.S. presidential election, millions of Americans saw a clip of George W. Bush joking to a wealthy group of people, "What a crowd tonight: the haves and the haves-more. Some people call you the elite; I call you my base." Yet, even with these kind of inflammatory remarks, the tens of millions of U.S. citizens who had come to despise Bush and his arrogance remained passive in the face of the 2000 non-democratic presidential elections.

Perhaps the "political genius" of the Bush-Cheney regime was in their full realization that Americans were so broken that the regime could get away with damn near anything. And the more people did nothing about the boot slamming on their faces, the weaker people became.

What forces have created a demoralized, passive, dis-couraged U.S. population?

The U.S. government-corporate partnership has used its share of guns and terror to break Native Americans, labor union organizers, and other dissidents and activists. But today, most U.S. citizens are broken by financial fears. There is potential legal debt if we speak out against a powerful authority, and all kinds of other debt if we do not comply on the job. Young people are broken by college-loan debts and fear of having no health insurance.

The U.S. population is increasingly broken by the social isolation created by corporate-governmental policies. A 2006 American Sociological Review study ("Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades") reported that, in 2004, 25 percent of Americans did not have a single confidant. (In 1985, 10 percent of Americans reported not having a single confidant.) Sociologist Robert Putnam, in his 2000 book, Bowling Alone, describes how social connectedness is disappearing in virtually every aspect of U.S. life. For example, there has been a significant decrease in face-to-face contact with neighbors and friends due to suburbanization, commuting, electronic entertainment, time and money pressures and other variables created by governmental-corporate policies. And union activities and other formal or informal ways that people give each other the support necessary to resist oppression have also decreased.

We are also broken by a corporate-government partnership that has rendered most of us out of control when it comes to the basic necessities of life, including our food supply. And we, like many other people in the world, are broken by socializing institutions that alienate us from our basic humanity. A few examples:

Schools and Universities: Do most schools teach young people to be action-oriented -- or to be passive? Do most schools teach young people that they can affect their surroundings -- or not to bother? Do schools provide examples of democratic institutions -- or examples of authoritarian ones?

A long list of school critics from Henry David Thoreau to John Dewey, John Holt, Paul Goodman, Jonathan Kozol, Alfie Kohn, Ivan Illich, and John Taylor Gatto have pointed out that a school is nothing less than a miniature society: what young people experience in schools is the chief means of creating our future society. Schools are routinely places where kids -- through fear -- learn to comply to authorities for whom they often have no respect, and to regurgitate material they often find meaningless. These are great ways of breaking someone.

Today, U.S. colleges and universities have increasingly become places where young people are merely acquiring degree credentials -- badges of compliance for corporate employers -- in exchange for learning to accept bureaucratic domination and enslaving debt.

Mental Health Institutions: Aldous Huxley predicted today's pharmaceutical societyl "[I]t seems to me perfectly in the cards," he said, "that there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude."

Today, increasing numbers of people in the U.S. who do not comply with authority are being diagnosed with mental illnesses and medicated with psychiatric drugs that make them less pained about their boredom, resentments, and other negative emotions, thus rendering them more compliant and manageable.

Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is an increasingly popular diagnosis for children and teenagers. The official symptoms of ODD include, "often actively defies or refuses to comply with adult requests or rules," and "often argues with adults." An even more common reaction to oppressive authorities than the overt defiance of ODD is some type of passive defiance -- for example, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Studies show that virtually all children diagnosed with ADHD will pay attention to activities that they actually enjoy or that they have chosen. In other words, when ADHD-labeled kids are having a good time and in control, the "disease" goes away.

When human beings feel too terrified and broken to actively protest, they may stage a "passive-aggressive revolution" by simply getting depressed, staying drunk, and not doing anything -- this is one reason why the Soviet empire crumbled. However, the diseasing/medicalizing of rebellion and drug "treatments" have weakened the power of even this passive-aggressive revolution.

Television: In his book Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television (1978), Jerry Mander (after reviewing totalitarian critics such as George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Jacques Ellul, and Ivan Illich) compiled a list of the "Eight Ideal Conditions for the Flowering of Autocracy."

Mander claimed that television helps create all eight conditions for breaking a population. Television, he explained, (1) occupies people so that they don't know themselves -- and what a human being is; (2) separates people from one another; (3) creates sensory deprivation; (4) occupies the mind and fills the brain with prearranged experience and thought; (5) encourages drug use to dampen dissatisfaction (while TV itself produces a drug-like effect, this was compounded in 1997 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration relaxing the rules of prescription-drug advertising); (6) centralizes knowledge and information; (7) eliminates or "museumize" other cultures to eliminate comparisons; and (8) redefines happiness and the meaning of life.

Commericalism of Damn Near Everything: While spirituality, music, and cinema can be revolutionary forces, the gross commercialization of all of these has deadened their capacity to energize rebellion. So now, damn near everything – not just organized religion -- has become "opiates of the masses."

The primary societal role of U.S. citizens is no longer that of "citizen" but that of "consumer." While citizens know that buying and selling within community strengthens that community and that this strengthens democracy, consumers care only about the best deal. While citizens understand that dependency on an impersonal creditor is a kind of slavery, consumers get excited with credit cards that offer a temporarily low APR.

Consumerism breaks people by devaluing human connectedness, socializing self-absorption, obliterating self-reliance, alienating people from normal human emotional reactions, and by selling the idea that purchased products -- not themselves and their community -- are their salvation.

Can anything be done to turn this around?

When people get caught up in humiliating abuse syndromes, more truths about their oppressive humiliations don't set them free. What sets them free is morale.

What gives people morale? Encouragement. Small victories. Models of courageous behaviors. And anything that helps them break out of the vicious cycle of pain, shut down, immobilization, shame over immobilization, more pain, and more shut down.

The last people I would turn to for help in remobilizing a demoralized population are mental health professionals -- at least those who have not rebelled against their professional socialization. Much of the craft of relighting the pilot light requires talents that mental health professionals simply are not selected for nor are they trained in. Specifically, the talents required are a fearlessness around image, spontaneity, and definitely anti-authoritarianism. But these are not the traits that medical schools or graduate schools select for or encourage.

Mental health professionals' focus on symptoms and feelings often create patients who take themselves and their moods far too seriously. In contrast, people talented in the craft of maintaining morale resist this kind of self-absorption. For example, in the question-and-answer session that followed a Noam Chomsky talk (reported in Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky, 2002), a somewhat demoralized man in the audience asked Chomsky if he too ever went through a phase of hopelessness. Chomsky responded, "Yeah, every evening . . ."

If you want to feel hopeless, there are a lot of things you could feel hopeless about. If you want to sort of work out objectively what's the chance that the human species will survive for another century, probably not very high. But I mean, what's the point? . . . First of all, those predictions don't mean anything -- they're more just a reflection of your mood or your personality than anything else. And if you act on that assumption, then you're guaranteeing that'll happen. If you act on the assumption that things can change, well, maybe they will. Okay, the only rational choice, given those alternatives, is to forget pessimism."

A major component of the craft of maintaining morale is not taking the advertised reality too seriously. In the early 1960s, when the overwhelming majority in the U.S. supported military intervention in Vietnam, Chomsky was one of a minority of U.S. citizens actively opposing it. Looking back at this era, Chomsky reflected, "When I got involved in the anti-Vietnam War movement, it seemed to me impossible that we would ever have any effect. . . So looking back, I think my evaluation of the 'hope' was much too pessimistic: it was based on a complete misunderstanding. I was sort of believing what I read."

An elitist assumption is that people don't change because they are either ignorant of their problems or ignorant of solutions. Elitist "helpers" think they have done something useful by informing overweight people that they are obese and that they must reduce their caloric intake and increase exercise. An elitist who has never been broken by his or her circumstances does not know that people who have become demoralized do not need analyses and pontifications. Rather the immobilized need a shot of morale.

NTS Notes: The psychological damage inflicted on Americans by the brainwashing of the media alone is absolutely astounding. One other factor that is missing in this article is the usage of poisons in both the food and water that Americans consume that are used to numb their brains. It is a known fact that Fluoride in drinking water alone makes entire populations docile. It is also a known fact that the use of Aspartame, Sucralose, High Fructose Corn Syrup, and MSG, in our foods weakens the body tremendously.

Is there still time to save America? I myself am never a quitter, and I strongly believe that if people are finally awakened to the truth, turn off their idiot box televisions, and stop taking the poisons in our foods, their minds can be cleared and we all can take back our planet from the criminals! That time is NOW!

We now have all of the evidence necessary to launch murder charges against the criminal Zionists and the state of Israel for their mass murder on September 11th, 2001. There is no doubt any more that these criminals did the crime to get the United States involved in their planned wars without end for their total control over the Middle East!

Here now I want to present the link to the March 24th Podcast by the Ugly Truth radio program hosted by Mark Glenn, that gives definitive evidence backing up Dr. Alan Sabrosky's bombshell Ugly Truth radio program on March 15th that says without a shadow of a doubt that Israel did 9-11.

NTS Notes: Please listen to the podcast, take it, copy it, email it to everyone you know. This MUST go viral over the Net and spread to everyone as quickly as possible because Israel is about to get their puppets in America involved in their newest war of bloodlust, this time against Iran.

It is our job in the real truth movement to get the truth out. I am doing my job, and it is up to readers to do their part as well.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

We know that the United States of America is definitely Zionist occupied territory. That is now beyond a shadow of a doubt. No politician in the Zionist Occupied Government (ZOG) within this occupied territory is ever "elected" without first being subjugated to a battery of tests to verify if that politician is "Pro-Israel" enough. That makes almost every member of both the Congress and the Senate of the United States of America nothing more than traitors to their own country!

If any reader wants proof of my statement made above, I want to present evidence from the following article that I came across from www.uruknet.info, that states that almost 300 members of the US House of Representatives have declared a commitment to the "unbreakable" US-Israeli "bond". This is both disgusting and most revolting, and definitely a must read:

By Natasha Mozgavaya, Haaretz Correspondent

March 25, 2010

Nearly 300 members of Congress have signed on to a declaration reaffirming their commitment to "the unbreakable bond that exists between [U.S.] and the State of Israel", in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The letter was sent in the wake of the severe recent tensions between Israel and the U.S. over the prior's decision to construct more than 1,600 new housing units in East Jerusalem, a project it announced during U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's visit to the region.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took advantage of his trip to the United States this week to try to mend the rift with the Obama administration, but he was greeted with cold welcome by the White House.

Netanyahu also met during his visit with members of Congress, who welcomed him with significantly more warmth.

The letter from Congress expresses its "deep concern" over the U.S.-Israel crisis, and emphasizes that lawmakers had received assurances from Netanyahu that the events leading up to the recent tensions would not be repeated.

Letter from members of Congress

Dear Secretary Clinton:

We are writing to reaffirm our commitment to the unbreakable bond that exists between our country and the State of Israel and to express to you our deep concern over recent tension. In every important relationship, there will be occasional misunderstandings and conflicts.

The announcement during Vice President Biden's visit was, as Israel's Prime Minister said in an apology to the United States, "a regrettable incident that was done in all innocence and was hurtful, and which certainly should not have occurred." We are reassured that Prime Minister Netanyahu's commitment to put in place new procedures will ensure that such surprises, however unintended, will not recur.

The United States and Israel are close allies whose people share a deep and abiding friendship based on a shared commitment to core values including democracy, human rights and freedom of the press and religion. Our two countries are partners in the fight against terrorism and share an important strategic relationship.

A strong Israel is an asset to the national security of the United States and brings stability to the Middle East. We are concerned that the highly publicized tensions in the relationship will not advance the interests the U.S. and Israel share. Above all, we must remain focused on the threat posed by the Iranian nuclear weapons program to Middle East peace and stability.

From the moment of Israel's creation, successive U.S. administrations have appreciated the special bond between the U.S. and Israel.

For decades, strong, bipartisan Congressional support for Israel, including security assistance and other important measures, have been eloquent testimony to our commitment to Israel's security, which remains unswerving.

It is the very strength of this relationship that has, in fact, made Arab-Israeli peace agreements possible, both because it convinced those who sought Israel?s destruction to abandon any such hope and because it gave successive Israeli governments the confidence to take calculated risks for peace.

In its declaration of independence 62 years ago, Israel declared: "We extend our hand to all neighboring states and their peoples in an offer of peace and good neighborliness, and appeal to them to establish bonds of cooperation and mutual help with the sovereign Jewish people settled in its own land."

In the decades since, despite constantly having to defend itself from attack, Israel has repeatedly made good on that pledge by offering to undertake painful risks to reach peace with its neighbors.

As the Vice-President said during his recent visit to Israel: "Progress occurs in the Middle East when everyone knows there is simply no space between the U.S. and Israel when it comes to security, none. No space."

Steadfast American backing has helped lead to Israeli peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan. And American involvement continues to be critical to the effort to achieve peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

We recognize that, despite the extraordinary closeness between our country and Israel, there will be differences over issues both large and small.

Our view is that such differences are best resolved quietly, in trust and confidence, as befits longstanding strategic allies. We hope and expect that, with mutual effort and good faith, the United States and Israel will move beyond this disruption quickly, to the lasting benefit of both nations.

We believe, as President Obama said, that "Israel's security is paramount" in our Middle East policy and that "it is in U.S. national security interests to assure that Israel?s security as an independent Jewish state is maintained."

In that spirit, we look forward to working with you to achieve the common objectives of the U.S. and Israel, especially regional security and peace.

NTS Notes: Again, America, YOU actually voted for these traitors! If these traitors love Israel so much, then they should all give up their US Citizenship, and get on the first plane available to fly to their dream land called Israel!

America needs politicians and elected officials that support the American people first, second, and third. These traitors belong in jail, and not in government !

The Best Sites Exposing The Truth About Israel's 9:11 Attacks On America

Best Sites For Exposing The Apollo Moon Landings Hoax!

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Notice

§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

About Myself

Canadian male, age 57..(Hard to believe I am that old..)
Sickened by the lies of history, and how our education system has ruined and failed our childrens' minds, I decided it was time to take a stand and put up real articles of truthful information.
Willing to fight to see truth come out, and to have the true criminals on our planet exposed for their crimes against humanity.
I am in this for the truth and where ever the truth leads me!
********************************************************
Northerntruthseeker is fully responsible for all content in this blog. If any errors or omissions are deemed necessary for correction of material, it will be placed into the articles affected, and notice will be put up for all readers. Northerntruthseeker will never accept money, personal gifts, or any threats, given for any material posted in this blog.
The information articles in this blog are free for everyone to take and spread to others.
In these times of uncertainty, people deserve the truth no matter how harsh it may be!