Im just thinking about how much it sucks that ILM and the designers of these bots put so much time and effort, with all the little detailing and what not, and we barely even get to see any of it. People LOVE the 1080p screen caps, but even those are half blurry, grainy photos. There are very few crisp clean shots of the bots in all their glory.

I think ILM or whoever, needs to render some really awesome shots of all the bots, so we can really see what all is going on in those designs. And also, I don't want to see hand drawn art, like most of the stock photos out there, I mean real complete rendered CGI images of the models themselves with full texturing.

Im just thinking about how much it sucks that ILM and the designers of these bots put so much time and effort, with all the little detailing and what not, and we barely even get to see any of it. People LOVE the 1080p screen caps, but even those are half blurry, grainy photos. There are very few crisp clean shots of the bots in all their glory.

I think ILM or whoever, needs to render some really awesome shots of all the bots, so we can really see what all is going on in those designs. And also, I don't want to see hand drawn art, like most of the stock photos out there, I mean real complete rendered CGI images of the models themselves with full texturing.

But do that with the twins, arcee bots, **JOLT**all the little kitchen bots, dewbot, soundwave, the fallen, devastator, etc.. heck, we don't even get to SEE what Sideways looks like

Click to expand...

there is an extra in first movie DVD wich alow you to rotate,zoom ILM models of the robots.However it include only 6 main robots wich really suck if you are totaly robot models geek like me...afterall we should be happy to have that.
I think the reason they dont show it becouse they really got bored of models they worked on...I mean they did TONS of test renders and much of final ones and they were really feed up with them and after that hard work they dont even think about showing it.I know that feeling,Im 3D artist myself.

Or those people who work just see the models themselves and show it to the film crew and they are having enough of critique there I think.What's the reason showing model renders for us afterall?

I took the above screenshot and tried to make it's perspective to normal as if your looking at it directly instead of angleled . I did a resize for those interested and made it a bit sharper. Either way i attached all of them here:

Im just thinking about how much it sucks that ILM and the designers of these bots put so much time and effort, with all the little detailing and what not, and we barely even get to see any of it. People LOVE the 1080p screen caps, but even those are half blurry, grainy photos. There are very few crisp clean shots of the bots in all their glory.

I think ILM or whoever, needs to render some really awesome shots of all the bots, so we can really see what all is going on in those designs. And also, I don't want to see hand drawn art, like most of the stock photos out there, I mean real complete rendered CGI images of the models themselves with full texturing.

But do that with the twins, arcee bots, **JOLT**all the little kitchen bots, dewbot, soundwave, the fallen, devastator, etc.. heck, we don't even get to SEE what Sideways looks like

Click to expand...

Yeah, aside from all the stupid humor and lame sex jokes of the film that do get irritating, my main concern is not being able to see these robots upclose, ever, on screen or on any websites.

I can't wait for Ben Procter, Josh NIzzi and Paul Ozzimo to update there sites with more robot renders. Paul Ozzimo has yet to display concepts behind TF1, and Procter always delivers with his great 3d's. But the ILM designs is the best I could come accross on, but those are unlikely ever to be revealed.

I loved the designs of these robots, and whatever ILM gives us I'm happy, but still would like to see more, like Soundwave , Rampage, Scrapper or Sideswipe.

Also, if anyone has a higher rez render for this Bonecrusher PLEASE post it here, I'm sure there was one before, but not sure if it's gone for good;