Leaders of the big green groups are talking behind the scenes with President-elect Barack Obama and his staffers and advisors. The Obama camp has encouraged the dialogue, reaching out months ago for recommendations about how to clean up the George W. Bush mess and move forward on environmental issues.

In the final days of his administration, Bush is trying to dismantle as many environmental regulations as possible, weakening everything from the Endangered Species Act to the definition of organic salmon (to allow industrial farmed salmon to carry the label).

But Obama -- and Congress -- have already started pushing back. The House of Representatives voted a few weeks ago to install an environmentalist, California Rep. Henry Waxman, as chair of the House committee that oversees energy and climate-change issues. And bigger Democratic congressional majorities should give Obama a boost on future green initiatives.

Unfortunately, the global economic meltdown may get in the way of serious environmental progress. Still, many are looking to Obama and the next Congress with soaring expectations.

Zichella, who sees climate change as the top issue facing the new administration, hopes that Barack Obama will follow through on his many promises to act on it. Obama needs to develop more wind and solar energy, Zichella says, and force the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate carbon dioxide emissions under the Clean Air Act. (Bush's EPA has refused to do so, even ignoring a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the issue.) Such EPA action would greatly increase pressure on the coal-plant industry to clean up its act, if that's possible. And, Zichella adds, Obama's EPA should quickly allow California, Washington, Oregon, New Mexico and other states to carry out their plans to limit carbon-dioxide emissions from vehicles -- something else Bush's EPA refused to do. That would force the U.S. auto industry to make far more efficient vehicles, reducing fuel consumption as well as emissions. Thus, Obama "would help push the American auto industry in a direction it's failed to go, at its own peril."

As a rancher who raises grass-fed cattle and leads a group that markets that kind of beef, White seeks Obama's support for the local-food movement. Current policy, with its federal subsidies for huge corporate farms that gobble fossil fuels for long-distance shipments, also encourages the use of petro-chemical fertilizers and pesticides -- major causes of climate change and pollution. White is inspired by Michael Pollan's recent New York Times essay, "Farmer in Chief," which maps how Obama could lead on agricultural reform. Current regulations, for instance, make it difficult for small local slaughterhouses to operate, so most ranchers have to ship their cattle to industrial slaughterhouses controlled by what many describe as the meatpackers' cartel. "We need a radical re-visioning, away from the subsidization of the industrial food system. If we're going to incentivize solar and wind energy production, why don't we incentivize local food production as well? It has just as much climate impact."

CREATE 'TRANSPARENCY'

JON MARVELDirector of the Western Watersheds Project

Hailey, IdahoA well-known advocate of lawsuits against ranchers who abuse public land, Marvel hopes that Obama and the new Congress will finally make conservation the primary goal of public-lands management. Installing ombudsmen in all federal agencies to consider public complaints would help reduce the need for lawsuits, Marvel believes. But "the very first thing" Obama should do is make a lot more government documents available on the Internet. All the studies, memos, notes and data produced by agencies -- most of which are not readily available now -- could be collected in an online database, searchable by anyone. Marvel says such "transparency" would reduce political influences and corruption. "When you enable the public to see easily what the government is doing, you enable an informed electorate. The whole Bush program has been to create secrecy and to deny the public an understanding of what's going on. Obama knows how the Internet can be used. We are in a time now when technologically this can be done."

Gearon, a Stanford-educated Navajo, works with groups on many reservations to develop wind and solar projects, instead of the coal and other fossil-fuel schemes that are often backed by tribal governments. She's glad that Obama reached out to tribal leaders during his campaign, with promises to appoint an Indian policy advisor to his senior White House staff and to hold an annual summit of tribal leaders. "That's something I'm very excited about, and a little worried about. We work on a very grassroots and community level. A lot of times, we're not in exact alignment with our tribal governments. So I hope Obama's outreach is not only to the tribal governmental leaders, but also to the community people, so we're not locked into these one-track-mind economies on our reservations."

Huerta hopes that Obama will make the Environmental Protection Agency more vigilant in assessing the risks from farm chemicals, unlike Bush's EPA, which she believes favored industry over the concerns of workers and agricultural communities. Obama could also shift oversight of pesticides and herbicides from the EPA and the Department of Agriculture (which is also dominated by industry) to the Department of Health and Human Services. "We need a big change, to fully test the poisons to make sure they're safe," not only for farmworkers, but also for their field-side neighborhoods, consumers of crops, and ecosystems, Huerta says. "The pesticides sprayed from trucks and planes go into the farmworker communities. Thousands of farm workers have been poisoned. It's a question of political pressure. These are poor people. They don't have a loud voice. They don't have much support from the government."

EXPAND RESTORATION-RELATED JOBS

EMILY PLATTDirector of Gifford Pinchot Task ForcePortland, Ore.

As a forest-health advocate, Platt hopes that Obama will help fund eco-restoration jobs as part of his $700 billion plan to stimulate the economy. "Obama has focused on clean-energy jobs. But there's an incredible opportunity and need for restoration jobs on public lands in the West," she says. "For instance, there's an $8 billion backlog for road maintenance in national forests. We need to remove roads that aren't needed anymore and upgrade or maintain roads that are needed. The backlog causes problems for fish and wildlife -- erosion of sediment into streams and fragmentation of habitat -- and for people trying to gain access to public lands. We also need to do more to control weeds, replant areas, and restore fish habitat by creating pools and hiding cover. These are engineering jobs and (all kinds of laborer) jobs. It would be a boon to local economies and an investment in keeping our public lands in good shape."

More from Politics

Hey, Courtney White. Good luck with organic, free range, and other healthier foods. The One's Ag Secretary-designee, Vilsack, has long been lenient on CAFOs and other architecture of modern Big Ag.

Dream on.........

Hank Plummer

Dec 23, 2008 12:33 PM

Patty Limerick has been in sheltered Academia for too long; on some issues, there absolutely cannot be any compromise or illusion of "consensus," because the Bad Guys have already gotten their way for too long, and done far too much damage for us to allow them even more credibility and slack in the future.

Unfortunately, it appears that nobody in the top echelons of the O.Administration has much grasp of the DEEP issues affecting the West, so don't get your hopes up too high. You may have voted for him once, but I predict, the ways things are shaping up, that you won't vote for him again.

well Hank, what about Obama's Interior pick Ken Salazar?

Sarah Gilman

Dec 29, 2008 02:17 PM

He's got a deep interest in and understanding of Western issues, from water to oil shale to ranching to natural gas development and on and on. Granted, he's no left-wing Greenie, but there's no reason a consensus-building centrist like Salazar would be less in-the-know. In fact, I'd argue a centrist has got a better chance of grasping the subtleties involved in Western natural resource issues, given that being a centrist involves evaluating and reconciling arguments from multiple sides and viewpoints.