62 Â s :,,, ); .. < :...: ,'::' ": ..,.:t o ' :::: ,1 .I ^ ,..' 0 . \ I '::- to "q n "<'<.. ,. " , os ::.:.. , :t \, "% $ ",W ':"'::' '*;. .":. :: :...::::t::::f : , d .Ñ> ., 0/"\ .. , New trio from France . By Dana Cote D Azur. The superbly cut tuxedo blazer, 215.00, zip-front pants, 86.00, both in cruise white wool gabardine. Also black, light green, caramel The silk shirt in all but black, 7S.00. 1nMt rr Magnifique. 4 to 14. Dana Shop, third floor q, V 361 Fifth Avenue, branches. MU-9-7000 Announcing the 1110st rOl11antic gift under the sun: the 11100n. { %.,., I ß . >"" " ..., , ...Ò:: 'j:<- />< :: " ,;. r < :,h . . . . . e .. ^art . , . . ':: . Íe , :: , I .. J ... . ': , 5' . ,'-:r . t!9:ns . t .. o .. get , " , e . r . . fO .. r me " " h ; . . ': first tlm,e (n th "Moon"'P ndant by 'y, {çy + T illos.. Eighte nkar t gold,. the ". '" < , :t ,:-( ': dlamonds set In platinum. Large, $7"00." . 4' Small, $320. Chain and Choker not included Designs copyrighted ea from above"" " two of Jd unis Available at the fine jewelers listed below' San Francisco, Calif. FOX'S ST.FRANCIS Denver, Colo. THE 14 KARAT, INC. Indianapolis, Ind. SIPE-TOWNSEN & MAHRDT LTD. Kansas City, Mo. TIVOL JEWELS Westwood, N. J. M. J. LA VIANO & SONS INC Cleveland, Ohio H. W. BEATI1E & SONS INC Pittsburgh, Penna. HARDY & HAYES Houston, Tex. DONALD E. STEWART INC. (415) 989-5409 (303) FR7-1414 (317) 639-1351 (816) 931-5333 (201) 664-0616 (216) 241-4921 (412) 281-4344 (713) 626-5240 [Wilkes] a person of the greatest con- sequence In the Kingdom." Benjamin Franklin was in England during one of Wilkes's campaigns for reëlection, and noted, "I went last week to Winchester and observed that for fifteen miles out of town there was not a door or window shutter next the road unmarked [wIth No. 45]; and this continued here and there quite to Winchester, which is sixty-four miles." The public cr} "Wilkes and Number F orty-fi ve forever!" was heard every- where-even George Ill's small chil- dren would burst into his sitting room and shout it at him-and when Crown officers later arrested \\Tilkes for an- other offense great crowds rescued hinl dnd carried him through the streets of London in triumph. Although there is little evidence that many of these ordi- nary citizens appreciated the Issues un- df'rlying the case-"the crowd always want to draw themselves from ab- stract principles to personal attach- ments," Edmund Burke rel11arked at the time-the clamorous public sup- port for Wilkes ultimately secured some measure of freedom of the press and largely destroyed general war- rants as a political weapon in Britain. On legal grounds, though, a simi- lar EnglIsh case during the same peri- od was to have more fundamental and lasting effects on the subject of general warrants. Six months before Wilkes's first arrest, Lord Hdlifax issued a warrant for the arrest of ] ohn Entick, described in contempo- rary records as a "clerk," who was thought to be Involved in publishIng an anti-government periodical called the M onztor, or British Freeholder. This time, the warrant was more specific, because it at least named En- tick, but it was also general, because it ordered the seizure of hIs books, papers, and documents. Crown officers spent four hours ransacking Entick's house, and then took him and every scrap of paper they could find off to Halifax's office. But when Halifax and his men examined the confiscated pa- pers, they found no evidence against Entick, and he was released. He did nothing about his mistreatment by the government at the time, but tfter Wilkes won his suit Entick sued the officers who had searched his place, also on a charge of trespass, '1nd won damages of three hundred pounds. Ap- parently fearing the consequences of another legal victory by its opponents, the government filed an "exception" to the verdict, a form of appeal, and the case-Entick v. Carrington-came be- fore the Court of Common Pleas in