COMETA Report. The name COMETA in English stands for "Committee for in-depth studies". This report was carried out over a several year period at the Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense, or IHEDN, a high-level French military think-tank.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDjjIQbSYgk

_________________The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true Art and Science. - Albert Einstein

COMETA Report. The name COMETA in English stands for "Committee for in-depth studies". This report was carried out over a several year period at the Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense, or IHEDN, a high-level French military think-tank.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDjjIQbSYgk

I read a book by a female author on this she also helped with the show "I know what I saw" which was inspired by this release...

Let me try to summarize this second document conclusions in a very few lines:The skeptical community agrees that UFOs do exist.And they mean here that real Flying Objects that have been seen are still Unidentified.They also agree that the testimonies in the report were gathered objectively and adequately.However, they do not agree with the main conclusions of the report based on the principle that the lack of scientific explanations does not necessary lead to the unique and unanimous conclusion that we are not alone.They remind their famous skeptical principle that extraordinary claims would require extraordinary evidence [in their favor before they could be accepted as having validity].

COMETA Report. The name COMETA in English stands for "Committee for in-depth studies". This report was carried out over a several year period at the Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense, or IHEDN, a high-level French military think-tank.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDjjIQbSYgk

I'd like to comment, though I'm not 'categorised' as a sceptic... even ufologists have to be scepticalI've been involved in ufology since my encounter with two 'nuts 'n' bolts' saucers in 1977Was involved in an important investigation of a 'hot spot' (think Mt. Washington) in 2005/6That investigation (and 50 hours of footage) was quashed because of the usual reasons of national security

Hopefully the COMETA Report will get some press, but I wouldn't hold my breathConsidering the 'deafening wall of silence' after the Disclosure Conference in 2001, I don't expect much to changeIt takes many years to even begin to grok what's happening with ufo's and associated phenomenaAs it enters the realm of 'high weirdness' it gets less likely for governments to disclose what's happeningThey have to be able to explain what it is, rather than admit to knowing a small part of what it isWhy should the governments be able to understand this much more than the dedicated ufologists?Sure, they may have retrieved craft and an alien or two, but it's much bigger than thatAnyway, it'll all come out in the wash, it's just a waiting gameI find it more interesting studying the disinformation agents these days, collecting more footageand pics is really just butterfly collecting for me, as it will never convince die-hard scepticsThis stuff can take over your life if you have an enquiring mind, and I'd rather be playing music!

Overlords of the UFO is a scientific suppressed and banned documentary from 1976. Much of this documentary features long lost photos of UFO's and other evidence long taken out of the public main stream media. This documentary also discloses that the govt has all ready admitted to the existence of off world UFO's, but that information has long been manipulated out of the public's attention and eyes.

Some of the documentary goes into other unexplained phenomenon also. BUT the most important information in this movie is that the govt has all ready disclosed and released the evidence of UFOs and ETs but that disclosure has been taken out of the public's awareness and media for decades.

I have personally seen countless UFO's, one of them up close (with my best friend from high school), spoken to aliens through channels in person and have made contact with a few different races of aliens, one of those physical contacts I was completely physically aware of. I have been studying the truth about UFOs and aliens for over 20 years and have had experiences with them since I was a little kid.

I do not own this video or the contents within, I am uploading it only for educational purposes only.

This documentary was ripped from a low cost DVD featuring old TV documentaries on UFOs. It is pretty much in the public domain.

_________________The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true Art and Science. - Albert Einstein

I don't even have to watch it to know its the same bullshit they have been trying to sell the public as an explanation for years, like Von Daniken says, some of these things you just can't get around that they were ment to be seen from high in the sky, or the stones can not be moved today (with anything), or you can not cut the stone with simply tools.

And with Christopher Dunn's research into machine tool marks all over Egypt and discovery of tooling tolerances to within 1000th of an inch, what else need we say...

There are interesting points in the "debunking" documentary. It is pretty long, and not everything holds water. But particularly in the Renaissance art stuff it is pretty convincing, you can skip to particular parts...

_________________The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true Art and Science. - Albert Einstein

There are interesting points in the "debunking" documentary. It is pretty long, and not everything holds water. But particularly in the Renaissance art stuff it is pretty convincing, you can skip to particular parts...

It was far to ling to watch and all the crap at the start I have seen before and it is exactly that crap, I don't see any way they could explain the art work that would be convincing...for one the images are clear and familiar to us from modern photos and knowledge, second if there is a commen explanation we would see far more of these things in paintings instead of the few examples that exist.

If you could supply a synopsis of their position it would be interesting to hear...

I guess I could not point the exact details without rechecking it or researching the net (and since I like you, I have to say I am a bit disappointed, because looks that you are acting the same way people who won't even hear about UFOs to begin with). But, he argues that the common theme of the man beholding the skies with his dog by his side is a common theme of a given shepard saint, and that the so called crafts are common Renaissance representations of the Sun and Moon.

Ex:St-Something and dog

Stylized representation of the moon, not a craft, according to the guy in question.

Don't get me wrong, you know that I am open minded to this subject, and I don't think both explanations are mutually exclusive, but some arguments he puts forth are compelling, even though it seems that he is indeed biased... The discussion is fundamental, the silence is unwanted

PS: BTW, nice ones, ghost!

_________________The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true Art and Science. - Albert Einstein

I guess I could not point the exact details without rechecking it or researching the net (and since I like you, I have to say I am a bit disappointed, because looks that you are acting the same way people who won't even hear about UFOs to begin with). But, he argues that the common theme of the man beholding the skies with his dog by his side is a common theme of a given shepard saint, and that the so called crafts are common Renaissance representations of the Sun and Moon.

Ex:St-Something and dog

Stylized representation of the moon, not a craft, according to the guy in question.

Don't get me wrong, you know that I am open minded to this subject, and I don't think both explanations are mutually exclusive, but some arguments he puts forth are compelling, even though it seems that he is indeed biased... The discussion is fundamental, the silence is unwanted

I guess I could not point the exact details without rechecking it or researching the net (and since I like you, I have to say I am a bit disappointed, because looks that you are acting the same way people who won't even hear about UFOs to begin with). But, he argues that the common theme of the man beholding the skies with his dog by his side is a common theme of a given shepard saint, and that the so called crafts are common Renaissance representations of the Sun and Moon.

Ex:St-Something and dog

Stylized representation of the moon, not a craft, according to the guy in question.

Don't get me wrong, you know that I am open minded to this subject, and I don't think both explanations are mutually exclusive, but some arguments he puts forth are compelling, even though it seems that he is indeed biased... The discussion is fundamental, the silence is unwanted

PS: BTW, nice ones, ghost!

I like ghosts stuff too...As to the debunkers, I have read sooo much of their stuff over the years that I may have lost perspective...that is due for example to an in depth reading of one book debunking the Roswell Event while comparing the conclusions and assumption to the books they were debunking, the amount of inaccuracy was staggering. This led me to the conclusion that just reading the debunkers book would give one a ill informed version of events as they transpired, and one would never know that the author took such liberty as to basically call some of the best eye witness testimony out right lies, that is a hell of a assumption and intellectually dishonest.

Who is online

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum