How important was Bismarck in the formation of the modern German state? Bismarck is the subject of much debate amongst historians, who question his importance in

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Michaeljohn Kalakoutis I.B History HL Mr Hengstler 02/02/06 How important was Bismarck in the formation of the modern German state? Bismarck is the subject of much debate amongst historians, who question his importance in the formation of the modern German state. The answer to this question comes in many forms, as, for example, some historians argue that Bismarck's role in the formation of the modern German state was one of action, whilst other historians argue that there was a great deal of hesitancy leading up to Bismarck's actions. Surely though, one can argue that Bismarck's role, whether hesitant or not was integral to the formation of the modern German state, to the extent that he was responsible for much of Prussia's dominance in Germany at the expense of Austria, which in effect, formed the modern German state. ...read more.

Middle

Also, Bismarck saw to it that the military was strengthened and well trained, which was to play a substantial part in Prussia's future dominance in Germany, at the expense of Austria. Bismarck's introduction to the Prussian government was to have great results for Prussia. Bismarck waged war on Austria in 1866, after gathering political allies. The resulting war lasted only seven weeks and Austria was defeated. Prussia had mobilised quickly, had superior weaponry and good railways with which to rush troops to the frontier. Prussia's alliance with Italy forced Austria to fight on two fronts. Austria, on the other hand, had been completely isolated and could look nowhere for support. As a result of the war, the Treaty of Prague was signed with Austria in August 1866, and Bismarck was extremely lenient in his terms. ...read more.

Conclusion

Bismarck's motive for waging war on France was to subdue France so that she would not have any incentive to claim land gained by Prussia. Thus, Bismarck played a vital part in asserting Prussian dominance in Germany, at the expense of Austria as well as Prussia's allies. Without the participation of Bismarck, Prussia would not have been strengthened both economically and militarily to the extent that she could defeat Austria and claim her position as the dominant of the two largest German states. Also, Bismarck gathered allies in his campaign against Austria which ultimately led to a Prussian victory and the formation of the modern German state. Due to the Franco-Prussian war, Bismarck's cancellation of his ally-relationship with France, albeit unethical, was completely necessary in order to strengthen Germany. ...read more.

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

Bismarck believed that Germany should be united under Prussian leadership and that Austria should have nothing to do with Germany. Bismarck was chosen as chancellor by the Prussian king as he had a proven record as a monarchist and had little time for liberal and excessive parliamentary ideas.

To the Bolsheviks, class membership determined whether individuals were either saved or damned. The Soviets had made it unmistakably clear that they intended to exterminate a whole class. Nolte's point was that the Nazis were no different except that they aimed to exterminate races rather than classes.

Bismarck had a proven record as a monarchist and had little time for liberals and excessive parliamentary ideas. In 1861, Liberals in the Prussian Diet rejected budget proposals to raise taxes for army reforms. The King considered abdication, but was persuaded by Von Roon to make Bismarck Minister-President.

Career Three: Riefenstahl as a film director * Riefenstahl was fascinated and obsessed with film and the effect that could be created through the use of movement, different camera angles, lighting and creative editing. * Riefenstahl developed a philosophy on filmmaking- she came to realize the importance of planning every

* By Feb. 1930 the Government was claiming that 50 percent of peasants had joined collective farms. An easing of pressure during the springtime sowing led to a temporary decline in numbers. By July collective farms included only 24% of peasant households and commanded 34% of sown area, and 90% and 94% sown area in July 1936.

The Alliance provided for two eventualities, (1) if either party were attacked by Russia, the other was to come to its assistance with its whole military force, (2) if either party were attacked by a power other than Russia (i.e. France), the other was to observe a benevolent neutrality.