Comments on the Climate Change Discussion

I
sent this comment off to an article
today on the current cold wave. A number
of the comments are against the climate change
argument, and it is evident that confusion on
the issue has been fully achieved.

To the Editors, please accept my apologies for the
lecture, but some things need to be said about climate
issues, if you choose to publish them.

The first order observation is that eastern North
America is experiencing extreme cold and high
precipitation, which has numerous precedents.
Press sensationalism of the situation is also not
new. What is new is the sustained, comprehensive
asymmetry in continental and global weather patterns
and the reasons for them, and most people are not
observant of this second order term in the equation.
Those of us studying real data on global temperature
and moisture patterns are aware of the massive
classified investments in aerosols and electromagnetic
manipulation of moisture and atmospheric conductivity
that are the true cause of climate
perturbations. Some of these effects have been
used to draw hurricanes into New Orleans and the East
Coast by manipulation of electrical conduction paths
between the upper atmosphere and earth, steering the
storms; these projects include a "social engineering"
component as well. Intra-continental cyclones
are also a new phenomenon that began the the 2007
Oklahoma storm, notably quietly anticipated years in
advance among certain weather analysts.
Following the revelations on previous temperature
overstatements and shoddy data handling in the peer
reviewed meteorology community that led to false
claims of CO2 greenhouse effects, there has been a
systematic campaign to reverse the public impression
of climate change status under an accelerated aerosol
campaign over the arctic and most notably over the
eastern Pacific and eastern U.S., causing the
sustained California drought under an artificial high
pressure cell, and a diverted circulation through
upper Canada and into the mid and eastern U.S. as
below normal temperatures. Some have suggested
that this was to divert Fukushima radiation, but this
does not appear to be a fully tenable argument.
It is notable however, that significant radiation hot
spots were discovered in Toronto and St Louis during
the year of the Fukushima disaster. Considering
the hideous scale of damage from the induced drought,
the modest reduction in radiation in California and
Oregon does not justify the explanation.

As mentioned, the first order term in the statistics
of winter weather does not reveal a chi-square result
that clearly indicates departure from the norm of
weather fluctuations, but continuation of the current
manipulation will prove out a clear departure in the
mean.

The net effect of the real causes of
global climate change is a botched weather
manipulation campaign that is now showing up as a
slight rise in average global temperatures and a
much more marked increase of polar temperatures and
ice recession. These are currently second
order effects in the overall behavior of the system,
but soon they will become first order. Again,
it is not CO2 in any significant amount, but the
aerosols of the geo-engineering programs of the
U.S., Russia ad China that are to blame.

As we speak, the methyl-hydrate beds, especially the
large reserves under the Arctic Ocean, are starting to
boil up, and as the Arctic Ocean becomes exposed to
more direct sunlight, the albedo will, within a few
years, reach a critical point of auto-circulation
feedback in which the currents in the ocean will draw
enhanced flow over the methane beds, releasing even
more methane. Methane is orders of magnitude
higher in greenhouse effect than CO2, and even a small
fraction of current reserves will raise global
temperatures above the point that will allow larger
animals to survive. Although not verified, there
is serious consideration that the controllers of the
geoengineering programs are in a panic, and that they
have accelerated aerosol spraying as a stop-gap
attempt at local cooling and also as a part of
manipulation of water and crop production in the West,
and to confuse the American public over the real
direction and cause of climactic drift, as they
prepare for the precipitous, deadly changes to
come. It is also known that the sun has cooled
slightly, but this only further substantiates the
effects of deliberate climate manipulation and its
gross failure. Although local effects are
cooling and precipitation, the net global effect of
geoengineering campaigns is reduction of rainfall and
increased temperatures, to be amplified immensely by
the methane catastrophe. To a significant
extent, the "bar tab on the Titanic" fiscal policies
of the U.S. and nearly every nation drawn along with
the game can be explained by the secretly held
knowledge that the planet is on the verge of a huge
acceleration into a catastrophe, obviating concerns
about future debt, and usurping future income of
nations for arguably nefarious purposes of survival of
a select few. It is not clear whether the 2010
infarction of the Gulf Stream is a result of
manipulation, but it is suspected, and net effect of
this is substantial cooling of Northern Europe,
another second order effect of changes in global
weather patterns. In summary, the planetary
climate mechanism is indeed in turmoil and dangerously
near a catastrophe, but due to gross failures of
deliberate weather manipulation, and not in any
significant part from CO2 production . The
damaging effects of pollution are another matter
however.

RuralSurvival.info℠ (Right-side navigation page SSI
insertion)

Donate to Operations?

We truly need your help to
continue to be able to pay the bills - anything that
you could contribute would be of immense help...