The calendar just flipped to November and already Hallmark is having a difficult holiday season.

Last month, the company debuted a new Christmas ornament shaped like a tacky holiday sweater with a festive message: "Don we now our fun apparel." That's right, "fun." Not "gay." Hallmark has taken a famous Christmas carol lyric about wearing cheerful holiday clothes and changed it to avoid implicitly referencing homosexuality. The ornament has left Hallmark open to simultaneous criticism for being antigay and too politically correct.

That's right: In attempting to avoid a controversy, Hallmark has apparently offended almost everyone.

A few comments below his, Jerrilyn York Thompson complained from the other perspective: "Hallmark claims to be the keeper of traditional values; then, you change the words to a century's [sic] old Christmas Carol to appease maybe 2 percent of the population. I am so sick of this PC society that will defer to whatever fringe of society that is yelling the loudest."

It just gets worse from there.

"Our GAY family will (return) any Hallmark cards received," a writer named Richie recently tweeted to Hallmark. "Straight America is offended!" wrote Joyce McNealy on Facebook.

Hallmark, apparently caught off guard by this outcry, issued the following explanation: "Today (the word 'gay') has multiple meanings, which we thought could leave our intent open to misinterpretation. The trend of wearing festively decorated Christmas sweaters to parties is all about fun, and this ornament is intended to play into that, so the planning team decided to say what we meant: 'fun.' " According to a Hallmark spokesperson, the ornament is still for sale in Hallmark Gold Crown stores.

To be fair, Hallmark's probably right that an outlandish sweater with the words "Don we now our gay apparel!" would also cause some confusion. Would it be implying that all holiday sweaters somehow looked gay? That all gay people wear ridiculous Christmas sweaters? What about gay people who don't celebrate Christmas? The ornament could be taken as a gesture embracing the gay community - or it could just as easily be read as flippant parody.

But changing "gay" to "fun" doesn't do anything except remind everyone that the word "gay" is supposed to be there instead, so we still end up thinking about the lyric and the same questions arise all over again.

If Hallmark was worried that "gay apparel" would offend people - and clearly it would have - maybe the right move would have been to avoid the lyric at all. The company could have released a sweater-shaped ornament with no writing on it, just like it apparently did in 2003.

Or, it could've just gone with a different "Deck the Halls" lyric. As far as anyone can tell, no group takes offense to the immortal phrase: "Fa la-la la-la, la-la la la."