Talk:Neil Armstrong

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

I think this is a fairly decent, workmanlike article; I just think it's missing something. Any ideas? --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 09:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Humour:

4

It's just not funny enough. Jokes are few and far between while fictitious history isn't terribly funny

Concept:

7

I like the idea of him being an actor starring in the moon landing hoax, but you need to take that further

Prose and formatting:

6

Nothing really wrong with it.

Images:

3

Not doing anything for me

Miscellaneous:

5

Don't want it feeling left out

Final Score:

25

"workmanlike" says it all. Comedy and workmanlike don't go. If you can't think of something funny to write don't fill in the rest of the article with boring fiction: It'll just make people miss the good bits