Tuesday, September 4, 2012

One
of the most important and mind-bending findings in quantum physics which has
helped us to better understand the nature of matter was first demonstrated in
what is known as the “double-slit” experiment.This experiment involves projecting photons, electrons, or other quanta
through a barrier with two small holes and measuring the way they are detected
before, during, and after their travels.Common sense suggests that if they begin as particles, they will travel
as particles and end up as particles, but the evidence shows something quite
different.

“Scientists
have found that when an electron, for example, passes through the barrier with
only one opening available, it behaves in just the way we’d expect it to: It
begins and ends its journey as a particle.In doing so, there are no surprises.In contrast, when two slits are used, the same electron does something
that sounds impossible.Although it
definitely begins its journey as a particle, a mysterious event happens along
the way: The electron passes through both slits at the same time, as only a
wave of energy can do, forming the kind of pattern on the target that only an
energy wave can make.”-Gregg
Braden, “The Divine Matrix” (71-2)

“In
the classic double-slit experiment, a stream of photons (or electrons or any
atomic-sized object) are shot at a screen with two tiny slits in it.On the other side of the screen, a
photographic plate or sensitive video camera records where each photon
lands.If one of the slits is closed,
then the camera will see a smooth distribution of photons with the peak
intensity directly opposite the open slit.This is what common sense would predict if the photons were individual particles.But if you open both slits, the camera sees a
different pattern: an interference pattern with varying bands of high and low
intensity.That is consistent with the
photons being a wave.”-Dean Radin,
“Entangled Minds” (215-6)

Furthermore,
when physicists lower the light intensity to shoot only one photon at a time,
somehow, they get the same results.With
one slit open, each photon shoots through and lands on the screen evenly
distributed, peak intensity perfectly aligned.So with two slits open, firing one photon at a time, you might likewise
assume to see two even distributions perfectly aligned behind each slit.However, just like when firing a flood of
photons through, somehow the photons “know” the second slit is open, pass
through both slits simultaneously, and end up on the screen as a wave-like
interference pattern.This experiment
and many similar replications have produced the same results every single time:
The quanta begin as single particles, shoot through the apparatus, register
going through both slits simultaneously, and then show up interfered with
themselves on the screen.Each
individual particle is somehow interfering or entangled with itself as a wave.This phenomenon has come to be known as
“particle-wave duality.”

“The
electron, like some shape-shifter out of folklore, can manifest as either a
particle or a wave.This chameleon-like
ability is common to all subatomic particles.It is also common to all things once thought to manifest exclusively as
waves.Light, gamma rays, radio waves, X
rays – all can change from waves to particles and back again.Today physicists believe that subatomic
phenomena should not be classified solely as either waves or particles, but as
a single category of somethings that are always somehow both.These somethings are called quanta, and
physicists believe they are the basic stuff from which the entire universe is
made.”-Michael
Talbot, “The Holographic Universe” (33-4)

This
particle-wave duality is a significant discovery because it shows that the basic
“building blocks” of our physical reality, not only are they 99% empty space,
but they constantly fluctuate between being precise, definable particles and
unlimited probability waves.Thus the
philosophical questions arise: What determines whether they are particles or
waves?How can something be in two
states at one time?How can the building
blocks of matter be so immaterial?

“With the development of quantum theory,
physicists have found that even subatomic particles are far from solid. In
fact, they are not much like matter at all – at least nothing like matter as we
know it. They can’t be pinned down and measured precisely. Much of the time
they seem more like waves than particles. They are like fuzzy clouds of
potential existence, with no definite location. Whatever matter is, it has
little, if any, substance.”-Peter
Russell, “From Science to God”

“Matter at its most fundamental level can not be divided into
independently existing units or even be fully described.Subatomic particles aren’t solid little
objects like billiard balls, but vibrating and indeterminate packets of energy
that can not be precisely quantified or understood in themselves.Instead they are schizophrenic, sometimes
behaving as particles – a set thing confined to a small space – and sometimes
like a wave – a vibrating and more diffuse thing spread out over a large region
of space and time – and sometimes like both a wave and a particle at the same
time.”-Lynne McTaggart, “The Field:
The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe,” (10)

Using
the example of water, we see an illustration of how something can be both a
particle and wave simultaneously.If you
separate a drop of water from the ocean then it is an independent, distinct
particle with definite location.However, put that same drop of water back in the ocean and it becomes
part of an integral, undifferentiated wave with no definite location.From the perspective of the individual H2O
molecules, nothing changes regardless of whether they are a drop or an ocean
wave.The wave/particle distinction
comes from us, the conscious observers, which brings us to another question: In
the double-slit experiment, how does the particle “know” whether or not the
second slit is open?Why does it act
like a particle when one slit is open, but act like a wave when two slits are
open?

“The
only explanation here is that the second opening has somehow forced the
electron to travel as if it were a wave … To do so, the electron has to somehow
perceive that the second opening exists and has become available.And this is where the role of consciousness
comes in.Because it’s assumed that the
electron cannot really ‘know’ anything in the truest sense of the word, the
only other source of awareness is the person watching the experiment.The conclusion here is that somehow the
knowledge that the electron has two possible paths to move through is in the
mind of the observer, and that the onlooker’s consciousness is what determines
how the electron travels.”–Gregg
Braden, “The Divine Matrix” (72-3)

It
seems the particles themselves are somehow conscious of the slits, or the
scientists’ consciousness is informing the particles.Either way, two amazing things are happening
here which rock the foundations of classical physics.Firstly, photons, electrons, and all quanta
are expressing the properties of both particles and waves
simultaneously.Secondly, the quanta are
essentially conscious and/or reading our minds!

“This
rather simple experiment raises a central question about the role of the
observer in quantum reality.This is
known as the quantum measurement problem: We infer that the photon acts like a
wave when we’re not looking, but we never actually see those waves.So what causes the photon to ‘collapse’ into
a particle when we do decide to look at it?In classical physics, objects are regarded as objectively real and
independent of the observer.In the
quantum world, this is no longer the case.”-Dean Radin, “Entangled Minds” (218)

“The quantum pioneers discovered that our involvement with matter
was crucial.Subatomic particles exist
in all possible states until disturbed by us – by observing or measuring – at
which point, they settle down, at long last, into something real.Our observation – our human consciousness –
is utterly central to this process of subatomic flux actually becoming some set
thing.”-Lynne McTaggart, “The
Field: The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe,” (XXVI)

9
comments:

Anonymous
said...

Can I just say what a comfort to find somebody who genuinely understands what they're talking about online. You actually understand how to bring a problem to light and make it important. A lot more people really need to look at this and understand this side of your story. I was surprised that you aren't more popular given that you certainly possess the gift.Feel free to surf my web site ; The Diet Solution Program

I'm not buying into this. this "science" comes from the same bullshit artists that have been telling us the world is solid and round, when we've actually found it to be hollow and flat.

...The same bullshit artists that tell us earth floats around a star in an obscure corner of an obscure galaxy, when you can look up in the night sky and see for yourself that the rest of the universe is circling us, even the so called "planets"

...The same bullshitting assholes that set up seismometers and barometers to record and try and predict "natural" disasters when they've been beaming them down to us from HAARP the entire time.

One day they'll get the majority of people to believe this particle and wave crap and use it as a new smoke screen to help further push their agenda...and we all know what they want to get done...

Be careful what you read into Eric, they can really get in peoples heads with these science and philosophy quantum bullshit. Are you aware of the politicization of science Eric??

You're jumping to conclusions and making accusations that have nothing to do with my article or quantum physics. I agree they have lied to us about HAARP and cosmology, but that has no bearing here. What specifically regarding the double-slit experiment are you taking issue with?

Some of your site is interesting, but honestly you're no different than Alex Jones, David Icke, or the multitude of others with their websites, blogs, books for sale, and oh yes, the donation tab/link. & im sure this comment will be "moderated" just like the others you may critique.

So you think I shouldn't be compensated for the years of hard work I've put into these books and blogs? Well, you'll be happy to know that I make next to nothing, I've barely sold any books, and I live in a tiny studio apartment. Here's Alex Jones' house.