German election 2017

In 2013 the AfD got 4.7%. This time they got 12.6%. Meanwhile, the spineless coward Merkel in the months prior to the election has already buckled to AfD (and Hungarian) pressure by making it harder for asylum seekers to receive asylum. As I have said before, unless an enemy party’s support is decreasing by absolute measures, we have no reason to even begin to relax:

Mainstream journalists need to stop hysterically and inaccurately associating the AfD with the NSDAP. The AfD are pro-Israel, pro-Russia, pro-democracy (Swiss-style), anti-Islam, anti-EU and anti-renewable-energy, the exact opposite of the NSDAP. The best source for understanding the psyche of the AfD is their own official campaign poster, which I previously linked to:

In other words, they explicitly equate being German with having no problem with butchering the pictured piglet. (Yes, they actually included a picture. What happened to the old days when even meat commercials used to at least avoid showing alive the animals – especially animal children - from which the meat comes?) To hold up cruelty to animals as a source of national pride goes way beyond merely practicing such cruelty in private; it is an attempt to embed acceptance of cruelty into collective consciousness.

(Islamophobes who support AfD are bound to retort that Muslim Germans, while not eating pork, are mostly not vegan either. This is true, but at least meat-eating is not something that Muslim leaders encourage their followers to take pride in, quite the contrary:

In the same way, even back in the 90s which I often tend to speak of in glowing terms, racists surely existed. The difference between then and now is that racism back then was not held up as a source of pride (other than within Judaism, but even Jews kept it secret back then, which is why we didn’t know about it), unlike today. This goes back to the point made in the opening paragraphs of this page:

Few individuals throughout history have lived up to the ideal of universal compassion, but at least the ideal itself used to be outwardly admirable in ideological discourse. A clear sign of collapsing civilization and descent to barbarism is when tribalism is not only practiced (as it has always been by the vast majority), but actually promoted by reactionary movements as more admirable than universalism.

…

It is crucial that tribalism, including but not limited to racism, be put back in its place as an attitude of inferiority if revolution is to be positive. As Hitler said: “Whoever doesn’t become sickened and nauseated upon making a closer acquaintance with the Talmud can put himself on display in a circus side show.”

I would say that the party that produced the above AfD campaign poster above should be put on display in the same circus side show. The problem is that they have not been. Instead, they have been put in the Bundestag with 94 seats.

If Merkel were not following the Zionist script which requires enough refugees to psychopolitically fuel the AfD’s rise but not enough refugees to demographically offset it had any common sense at all, far from decreasing refugee intake (which only signals concession to the AfD platform), she would on the contrary MASSIVELY INCREASE refugee intake and get all refugees able to vote ASAP:

“Merkel put her career on the line to help us,” said Haidar’s 55-year-old husband Ayman. “We want to learn German and contribute to the success of this country through work, simply to prove that she was right and her opponents were wrong.”

On the other hand, these naive refugees may imagine a pristine proto-National-Socialist Germany in their heads:

“It is all one to us what their origin was, as long as they can work to the benefit of our nation. That is the deciding factor.” – Adolf Hitler

but realistically their work cannot begin until those who wish to indiscriminately drive them out of Germany are defeated with absolutely ruthless Ahimsa, the likes of which Merkel will never be willing to use:

“Violence is broken only by violence and terror by terror. Only then can a new regime be created by means of constructive work.” – Adolf Hitler

This is where we come in:

“It has invariably happened in the history of the world that formal State authority has failed to break a reign of terror which was inspired by a Weltanschhauung. It can only be conquered by a new and different Weltanschhauung whose representatives are quite as audacious and determined. The acknowledgment of this fact has always been very unpleasant for the bureaucrats who are the protectors of the State, but the fact remains nevertheless.” – Adolf Hitler

Another old post is worth revisiting at this time:

Over the past decades, the general trend is that, as the European Muslim population % has increased, so has the far-right vote %. It used to be that the far-right vote % remained lower than the Muslim population % in most EU member states, but over the last few years (due to much help from Zionist reverse-bluff propaganda campaigns to increase bigotry in general and Islamophobia in particular), the far-right vote % has been leapfrogging ahead of the Muslim population % in one EU member state after another. This fills the identitarians with confidence in winning a hypothetical civil war should one break out in the near future.

Germany was one of the few EU countries where, as recently as in the previous election, the far-right vote % was still lower than the Muslim population %. With this election, however, Germany too has crossed the threshold. So again I earnestly urge every anti-Islamophobe in Germany to study the linked post and accordingly prepare – train, equip and organize - for war. We also welcome contact forms if you need help with planning etc.:

Despite whatever faults he had, whatever mistakes he made in times of weakness, and whatever reservations you have about him, he clearly had a vision and an inquiry that went further than most National Socialists. On a side note, it’s antithetical to the Aryan character to keep pointing out faults in non-jews, especially those who served under Hitler. I’m familiar with the weaknesses and vulnerabilities of those who served under Hitler, but I rarely bring it up because it is quite simply vindictive to keep looking for people to blame for our present state of the world. The Jew is ultimately responsible, we need look no further.

No work is insignificant, if it is done with a right attitude and for a right cause.

Mein Kampf
In the German language we have a word which admirably expresses the significance underlying all work. It is Pflichterfüllung (fulfilment of duty), which means the service of the common weal before the consideration of one’s own interests.

>The national socialist doctrine is the 25 point program (which was created when the DAP became the NSDAP in 1920 due to his own actions, which was before the time when Hitler went to prison and made Mein Kempf).

The National Socialist fundamentals were strictly rooted in a Greek axiom, which was transmuted into the German equivalents of “blood and soil”, “people and fatherland”.

>For instance, he was very willing to work with Poland over the existence of the German population there, despite his pro-expansion attitude in Mein Kampf. However, due to Poland’s pro-French policies, he quickly abandon such plan.

Yet his views on France never changed.

Recall Hitler said in MK, “I have had to add but little to what I then learned and made my own, and I have had to alter none of it.” And later in the Hitler-Bormann documents, “And I know perfectly well why, in spite of all the representations that have been made to me, I have seen no reason at all to change the opinions I formed twenty years ago.”

Obviously not everything in MK holds true forever. As Hitler pointed out in MK, the Russia Bismarck insisted on maintaining good relations with no longer exists.

>Also, Rosenberg’s “Myth” barely has anything to do with Hitler’s religious views.

Rosenberg argued for an Aryan Jesus in The Myth and The Track of the Jew (the latter delves extensively into the Jewish Talmud’s attitude towards Jesus).

In his early political speeches and MK, Hitler used every means to represent himself as a Christian and Jesus as an Aryan fighter. He eventually shed most recurrence to Christianity after he came into power. But the one thing he never dropped was the idea of an Aryan Jesus, which appears in the Table Talks, as late as Nov. 29-30, 1944. Reinhold Hanisch’s memoirs, published in 1939, indicates that Hitler may have held this conception from an early period in his life: “About Christ he said that he must surely have been in India, as he adopted points of Buddhism, and after all he was the son of a Greek who served as a Roman army captain.”

“Despite whatever faults he had, whatever mistakes he made in times of weakness, and whatever reservations you have about him, he clearly had a vision and an inquiry that went further than most National Socialists. On a side note, it’s antithetical to the Aryan character to keep pointing out faults in non-jews, especially those who served under Hitler. I’m familiar with the weaknesses and vulnerabilities of those who served under Hitler, but I rarely bring it up because it is quite simply vindictive to keep looking for people to blame for our present state of the world. The Jew is ultimately responsible, we need look no further.”

Rosenberg was smart in many ways, but he basically admitted to the Holocaust instead of just killing himself, like Hitler and Goebells did. That is a big issue regardless if he served under Hitler or not.

“The National Socialist fundamentals were strictly rooted in a Greek axiom, which was transmuted into the German equivalents of “blood and soil”, “people and fatherland”.”

I don’t deny that. The NSDAP’s program points make that clear.

“Yet his views on France never changed.”

It’s because the French government was trying to have Germany as its de facto. He didn’t hate all of France though.

“Recall Hitler said in MK, “I have had to add but little to what I then learned and made my own, and I have had to alter none of it.” And later in the Hitler-Bormann documents, “And I know perfectly well why, in spite of all the representations that have been made to me, I have seen no reason at all to change the opinions I formed twenty years ago.”

Obviously not everything in MK holds true forever. As Hitler pointed out in MK, the Russia Bismarck insisted on maintaining good relations with no longer exists.”

Hitler’s pro-Christian statements in MK obviously contradicts his more anti-Christian attitude in TT.

Bonus quote:

“But surely you recognize that Hitler was very careful not to offend in this direction in Mein Kampf or anywhere else in public, and I must be ten times more careful here in America.”

This quote is from the letter to Savitri Devi that Rockwell wrote other after she asked him about his pro-white and pro-Christian-identity attitude.

“There’s nothing wrong with being anti-Islamist, if Hitler saw the state of Europe right now he’d be disgusted”

Yes, he would be disgusted that rightists advocate alliance with Russia against the Islamic world instead of the other way round, and that Turkey STILL hasn’t been allowed to join the EU yet.

“As allies, I prefer the Turks to the Bulgarians. … The population of Sofia was enthusiastically welcoming a Russian football team. The fact is that Bulgaria is strongly affected by Panslavism, both on the political and on the sentimental level. … On the political and sentimental level, there’s no obstacle to an alliance between Turkey and the Reich. By reason of her attachment to Islam, Turkey has a completely clear-cut religious policy. The same is not true of Bulgaria, which, since it practises the Greek Orthodox religion, finds in it new reasons to feel friendly towards Russia.” – Adolf Hitler

And let’s not even get started about Israel.

“most of you on here promote interracial mixing between subsaharan Africans and Europeans”

It is impossible by definition for us to do this considering we reject the notion that interethnic reproduction is “interracial”. We do not particularly promote interethnic reproduction either; we simply do not oppose it.

“Hitler wanted races to be pure”

Yes, which means he would want people like you to be prohibited from reproducing.

“Hitler personally organised a marriage between a German and a so called Princess Tamilla of Tanzania. There’s no record of such marriage organisation”

Of course there wasn’t. Princess Tamilla was from Mauritania, not Tanzania.

“Where do you get these facts from lmao.”

Please feel welcome to retry with the correct search engine terms.

“At least Adolf Hitler wanted to keep German culture in tact.”

Such as butchering piglets (as the AfD considers to be German culture)?

As for The Myth of the Twentieth Century, it was published in 1930, in other words when the NSDAP was still trying to win elections.

“Too many mixed race children isn’t good for the identity of the world”

IDENTITY IS THE PROBLEM, you idiot. What is Jewishness if not an identity? Identitarianism is the method of classification by which the longest-lasting tribes are formed. Which is not to say that interethnic reproduction will suffice to eliminate identitarianism, but identitarianism is what we aim to eliminate.

@Black Sheep

“In fact, the last line:
“Indeed, I believe the more steadfast the Chinese and the Japanese remain in their pride of race, the easier I shall find it to get on with them.”
That basically says, race-relations, which may or may not include inter-marriage, will be easier then than the hyper-sensitive identitarian/PC clusterfuck we have not where you get shouted at for being evil by different groups of people for simply following your conscience.”

Thank you. To put this as unambiguously as possible, Hitler means that he should find it easier to get along with anti-Western Chinese and Japanese:

than with pro-Western Chinese and Japanese. I always refer to this quote:

“Just as there have always been two Germanys, so there have always been two Japans: the one, capitalist and therefore Anglophil—the other, the Japan of the Rising Sun, the land of the samurai. The Japanese Navy is the expression of this second world. It’s amongst the sailors that we’ve found the men nearest to ourselves. … Our Navy was inspired by the same state of mind, but the Army would have preferred an alliance with China.” – Adolf Hitler

Hitler clearly despises the fraction of Japan that holds a positive view of Westernization (what he calls “Anglophil”), as in the very next paragraph he says:

“There’s nobody stupider than the Americans. What a humiliation for them! The further they fall, the greater their disillusionment. In any case, neither of the two Anglo-Saxons is any better than the other.” – Adolf Hitler

Thus Hitler’s attitude is the diametric opposite to that of rightists who shower Japan with praise for how rapidly and how successfully it has Westernized itself, especially compared to so-called “Third World” countries (which the rightists despise). Hitler would have no reason to despise countries where less Westernization has occurred, on the contrary it would even be possible for him to interpret this as evidence of “pride of race” in those countries.

This would also apply to to Germany itself, which is why Hitler speaks of “two Germanys”. Now as then, there is one Germany (rightist) which wants to remain Western and which feels closer to other Western countries, and another Germany (leftist) which wants to de-Westernize and which feels closer to other non-Western (and until recently non-Westernized) countries. Hitler represents the latter:

“The Japanese, the Chinese and the peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France.” – Adolf Hitler

whereas the AfD represents the former. And the best thing is that all of this is predicted racially by our Aryan Diffusion theory.

Neither of you have described how indigenous populations are going to be protected in their own native country in this National Socialist state . On this blog site you say refugees welcome but then what happens with the indigenous people? You do realise that NS Germany was over 90% ethnic German?

>Rosenberg was smart in many ways, but he basically admitted to the Holocaust instead of just killing himself, like Hitler and Goebbels did. That is a big issue regardless if he served under Hitler or not.

First of all, you’re comparing a minor philosopher to two National Socialist leaders, the latter of which deserted his post. Rosenberg wasn’t obligated to kill himself, he was not a Field Marshal like Paulus who Hitler tried to negotiate for after his capture. Also, Goering didn’t kill himself either, but Himmler did! Second, you’re insinuating that Hitler and Goebbels killed themselves to avoid adding fuel to the Holocaust controversy. Are you implying that the NS should have carried out a mass suicide then? This is just a veiled attempt to blame some Germans for today’s mess.

>Hitler’s pro-Christian statements in MK obviously contradicts his more anti-Christian attitude in TT.

No contradiction between MK and TT. He just doesn’t resort to the Christian propaganda anymore i.e. no more mentions of “image of god”, “original sin”, cleansing of the Temple account, etc.

“Rosenberg argued for an Aryan Jesus in The Myth and The Track of the Jew (the latter delves extensively into the Jewish Talmud’s attitude towards Jesus).

In his early political speeches and MK, Hitler used every means to represent himself as a Christian and Jesus as an Aryan fighter. He eventually shed most recurrence to Christianity after he came into power. But the one thing he never dropped was the idea of an Aryan Jesus, which appears in the Table Talks, as late as Nov. 29-30, 1944. Reinhold Hanisch’s memoirs, published in 1939, indicates that Hitler may have held this conception from an early period in his life: “About Christ he said that he must surely have been in India, as he adopted points of Buddhism, and after all he was the son of a Greek who served as a Roman army captain”.

Well, I did say ‘barely’. Hitler still made no reference to Rosenberg or Rosenberg’s works when talking about Jesus.

“First of all, you’re comparing a minor philosopher to two National Socialist leaders, the latter of which deserted his post. Rosenberg wasn’t obligated to kill himself, he was not a Field Marshal like Paulus who Hitler tried to negotiate for after his capture. Also, Goering didn’t kill himself either, but Himmler did! Second, you’re insinuating that Hitler and Goebbels killed themselves to avoid adding fuel to the Holocaust controversy. Are you implying that the NS should have carried out a mass suicide then? This is just a veiled attempt to blame some Germans for today’s mess.”

Better to honorably commit suicide than to selfishly allow yourself to become a tool for the allies in order for them to have you admit the holocaust. (Look at the main site’s post on survivalism v. militarism).

“No contradiction between MK and TT. He just doesn’t resort to the Christian propaganda anymore i.e. no more mentions of “image of god”, “original sin”, cleansing of the Temple account, etc.”

There was more than just religious contradictions between MK and TT. He was even open to germanizing Poles in TT, compared to his more anti-Polish attitude in MK.

But now you’re saying that Hitler’s use of ‘original sin’ was just propaganda?

Also, TT and the Hitler-Bormann documents in general show a contradiction of the Hitler WN’s “worship” (and they usually cite MK to do so) and the one that aryanists “worship”.

Also, I don’t deny that Hitler was consistent with his private beliefs, as he mentions in TT.

However, as Rockwell basically put it, Hitler had to use all sorts of public propaganda and be careful with it; and, no, it wasn’t just Christian propaganda that Rockwell was referring to, but racial propaganda, too.

“Neither of you have described how indigenous populations are going to be protected in their own native country in this National Socialist state . On this blog site you say refugees welcome but then what happens with the indigenous people? You do realise that NS Germany was over 90% ethnic German?”

We would offer them partiality and fairness like we would do with refugees. But we’re also not going to joyfully support a population just for the sole sake of joyfully supporting it; that’s materialistic.

Also, NS Germany’s ethnic constitution was largely due to many Germans being racists themselves. I would have loved it if Hitler did more to go after racism in NS Germany, much like how I wish Obama did more to go after racism in the USA.

“On this blog site you say refugees welcome but then what happens with the indigenous people?”

…they will go on living their lives as usual?

“Neither of you have described how indigenous populations are going to be protected in their own native country in this National Socialist state.”

Non-immigrant citizens will receive no special treatment compared to immigrant citizens.

If you mean “indigenous” in an ethnic sense, we are anti-identitarianism, anti-ethno-tribalism, anti-ethnocentrism, anti-ethno-preservationism, etc., so there will certainly be no provisions providing special treatment to the “indigenous”/majority ethnic group in an NS state…

Most Muslim men are secretly Gay! Once they shear off their beards, throw away their Korans, and eschew their turbans, they will assimilate to the Gay Life Style. The way they whine about Islamophobia is exactly like how Homosexuals whine about Homophobia! Ever think of that.

They do misguided things, sadly enough, to prove how manly they are. But all merely to disguise what they are in truth. Notice, in The Old Testament and the Koran alike, there is the death penalty for Homosexual sex. Wonder why? Could it be that there was a hidden epidemic of it, among those desert peoples? Something to ponder.

@GG I do not hate Muslims anymore, now that I have realized this. Also, what I said about them could also be said about the more Orthodox Jews. By the way, Multiculturalism is actually keeping the Muslims Muslim; indeed, locking them into their Homophobic faith. Multiculturalism for precisely this very reason, should be done away with forever. Then, “Muslims” can be free to be what they really are: that is, to come out of the closet as it were.

Mark my word, if most Muslims could, they would come out of the closet as Gay. This, of course, is precisely what most of “America’s” Elite actually fears. That is why there is Multiculturalism, in my view. It keeps the Muslims, Muslim.

Speaking of the Alt Right, of course, they are not even racists. Rather, they started out as misogynists. They pretend to be racist, but I see right through them. All we really have to do is to call them out on their sexism. Alex Jones is simply a Conspiracy Nut!

All this faux tolerance of Islam, merely exists to prevent what they truly fear: Arab Men shaving off their beards, throwing away their Korans, and eschewing their turbans. Mark my words, it will eventually and inevitably happen. Just think, Muslim men, formerly Muslim men, will open up their Gay Bars, their Gay Baths, and endeavor to recruit Westerners to Homosexuality. Indeed, the reason Muslim nations have the death penalty for Homosexuality is precisely because it is a scourge, a secret scourge, among Desert dwelling Semitic peoples, in general.

You see, Islamism is a cloak, designed to disguise what is really going on in The Middle East and North Africa. Sometimes, I even suspect that Westerners allow Muslim men in because they perceive their own menfolk to not be manly enough. That is one part of the problem that almost none speak of. Yes, and eventually said Western peoples will get the shock of their lives, when they learn what the Muslims secretly are.

Look at it this way, if the Muslims were to assimilate, they would assimilate to The Gay Life Style. After all, the American Way of Life does not exist! At least not any more. And notice, the exact same way Gays complain of what they call Homophobia; Muslims complain of what they call Islamophobia. I always thought that rather humorous.

It took me a while, but finally I had this epiphany. Why else would there be so much pressure to support Islam? Perhaps, just perhaps, there was a fear that the Muslims would all become something else, something they would perceive as worse, without it. Suppose I am right?

Get some oranges or something similar for Vitamin C, should help your immune system through. Warm tea is probably also a good idea.

Also, no need to check the blog as often as you do, it’s perfectly fine for people to have to wait a few hours before you see their posts and respond to them. Respectively, it would also be better to make fewer but longer posts than many short ones.

“Get some oranges or something similar for Vitamin C, should help your immune system through. Warm tea is probably also a good idea.”

I’m feeling a bit better now, thank you.

“Respectively, it would also be better to make fewer but longer posts than many short ones”.

My apologies for the many short posts. I sometimes feel I leave out important information when posting, and I also have tendency to be too quick in posting my responsive comments to people on the blog, especially when a person frustrates me. I’ll get a better grip tho.

”Another example of the use of the term Untermensch, this time in connection with anti-Soviet propaganda, is a brochure entitled “Der Untermensch”, edited by Himmler and distributed by the Race and Settlement Head Office. SS-Obersturmführer Ludwig Pröscholdt, Jupp Daehler and SS-Hauptamt-Schulungsamt Koenig are associated with its production.[3] Published in 1942 after the start of Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union, it is around 50 pages long and consists for the most part of photos portraying the enemy in an extremely negative way (see link below for the title page). 3,860,995 copies were printed in the German language. It was translated into Greek, French, Dutch, Danish, Bulgarian, Hungarian, Czech and seven other languages. The pamphlet says the following:
Just as the night rises against the day, the light and dark are in eternal conflict. So too, is the subhuman the greatest enemy of the dominant species on earth, mankind. The subhuman is a biological creature, crafted by nature, which has hands, legs, eyes and mouth, even the semblance of a brain. Nevertheless, this terrible creature is only a partial human being.
Although it has features similar to a human, the subhuman is lower on the spiritual and psychological scale than any animal. Inside of this creature lies wild and unrestrained passions: an incessant need to destroy, filled with the most primitive desires, chaos and coldhearted villainy.
A subhuman and nothing more!
Not all of those who appear human are in fact so. Woe to him who forgets it!
Mulattoes and Finn-Asian barbarians, Gipsies and black skin savages all make up this modern underworld of subhumans that is always headed by the appearance of the eternal Jew.”

”Biology classes in Nazi Germany schools taught about differences between the race of Nordic German “Übermenschen” and “ignoble” Jewish and Slavic “subhumans”. The view that Slavs were subhuman was widespread among the German masses, and chiefly applied to the Poles. It continued to find support after the war.”

”The Untermensch concept included Jews, Roma and Sinti (Gypsies), and Slavic peoples such as Poles, Serbs and Russians.[7] The Slavs were regarded as Untermenschen, barely fit for exploitation as slaves. Hitler and Goebbels compared them to the “rabbit family” or to “stolid animals” that were “idle” and “disorganized” and spread like a “wave of filth”.[24] However, some among the Slavs who happened to have Nordic racial features were deemed to have distant Germanic descent which meant partially “Aryan” origin, and if under 10 years old, they were to be Germanized”

“Thirty-four percent of those categorized by the research group as “extreme left” agreed with the statement that Jews had “too much influence” in Germany.

Even among the radical left – which differs from the ‘extreme left’ in the definitions used by the study in that extreme left attitudes are incompatible with democracy and the German constitution – the figure of those agreeing with the statement was worringly high, at 16 percent.

On average, one in ten of those surveyed agreed with the statement.

The study included an online survey of 36,000 people. Those on the extreme left and radical left, as determined by the survey, made up 17 percent of respondents, of which four percent were left extremists.

I wonder how long it will take for German “extreme leftists” to realize how much they have in common with National Socialism, in contrast to the Zionist establishment, and Zionist-sympathetic rightist identitarians…?

“German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Friday demanded his country’s immigrants reject anti-Semitism, characterizing it as a “non-negotiable” condition for living in Germany.

“There are things which are part of Germany. And one of these is our responsibility for our past: the lessons of two World Wars, the lessons from the Holocaust, the responsibility for Israel’s security, the rejection of any form of racism and anti-Semitism,” said the German president at a Hanukkah event at the Israeli embassy in Berlin.

“For this responsibility, no line can be drawn under the past for later generations – and no exceptions be made for immigrants. It is non-negotiable – for all who live in Germany and want to live here!” he added.

“In a piece for weekly magazine Der Spiegel, Justice Minister Heiko Maas wrote that the Holocaust, in which the Nazis killed six million Jews, and its significance needed to become an even more important part of integration courses and migrants should be tested on it in the examination at the end of their course.

“The lessons from the Holocaust need to be one of the guiding ideas in those lessons and not just some chapter of German history,” he said.

“Racism has no place in Germany, so everyone who wants to stay in Germany for the long term needs to be clear that we fight the Neonazis’ anti-Semitism and we won’t tolerate any imported anti-Semitism from immigrants either,” Maas added.
…
Speaking at an event marking the 70th anniversary of the establishment of Israel, German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier said on Friday Germany needed to remember its historical responsibility, including the lessons of two world wars, the Holocaust, ensuring Israel’s security and rejecting any form of racism and anti-Semitism.”https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-germany-antisemitism/holocaust-must-be-bigger-part-of-migrant-courses-german-minister-idUKKBN1E91U1