As
I’ve indicated many times previously, the power elite wants a World
Socialist Government, but how will they get the people of the U.S. to
accept Socialism? Well, first there will have to be a crisis. For example,
today oil and commodity (e.g., corn) prices are skyrocketing (the price
of wheat has tripled in the past 10 months). And with increased demand
from China, India, etc., global demand will eventually outrun supply.
This crisis will lead to calls for “National Planning” similar to that
under FDR in the 1930s.

National
Planning is a hallmark of Socialism. The British Political Economic
Planning (PEP) organization was sponsored by Fabian Socialists, and
in the May 3, 1934 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Rep. Louis McFadden quoted
PEP member Israel Moses Sief as saying: “Let’s go slowly for a while,
until we can see how our plan works out in America.”

Democratic
presidential candidate Al Smith had supported FDR for the presidency
in 1932. However, on January 25, 1936, Smith delivered a speech stating:
“Just get the platform of the Democratic Party, and get the platform
of the Socialist Party, and lay them down on your dining room table
side by side…. Study the record of the present Administration to date.
After you have done that, make your mind up to pick up the platform
that more nearly squares with the record, and you will put your hand
on the Socialist platform.”

The
current situation has arisen because the power elite has created a global
economy via globalization. Prior to this, if there was an economic crisis
in one country, many other nations would not be affected. As Pat Wood
of the AUGUST REVIEW points out, though, for the first time in history
all countries’ economies (including stock markets) seem to be rising
and falling together. Remember the global impact of the recent mortgage
debacle here. It was because banking, investing, lending, etc., are
now global.

This
is not accidental. It’s part of the power elite’s plan to create a global
economic crisis (greatly devalued currencies, stocks, bonds, etc.).
A global reduction of credit is leading to a global sale of assets at
lower and lower prices, which in turn will affect the global derivatives
market, etc. Pat Wood characterizes what’s going to happen as the equivalent
of what happened to Enron but on a global scale, and the economies of
all the nations of the world will plummet together.

This
will result in the world’s population submitting to the power elite’s
“International Planning” (for International Socialism) whereby they
will manage the world’s (and each nation’s) economy. The political structure
they will form to do that will be a World Socialist Government. This
will be what David Rockefeller in his MEMOIRS (2002) called “conspiring
with others around the world to build a more integrated global political
and economic structure—one world, if you will.”

Population
control is also an important part of the power elite’s International
Planning. In this regard, they consider people no better than animals
upon whom to conduct experiments. For example, Eileen Welsome in THE
PLUTONIUM FILES: AMERICA’S SECRET MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS IN THE COLD WAR
(1999) revealed that 73 disabled children in a Massachusetts schools
were spoon-fed oatmeal laced with radioactive isotopes, and 829 pregnant
women at a Tennessee clinic were given “vitamin cocktails” containing
radioactive iron.

These
and other horrible experiments by the U.S. government on unknowing and
unwilling Americans occurred over a 30-year period. Also during this
time, Frederick Jaffe (vice-president of Planned Parenthood-World Population)
wrote a memo to Bernard Berelson (president of the Population Council,
founded in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller III) on March 11, 1969 including
“Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce Fertility, by Universality
or Selectivity of Impact.” Among the examples listed was “fertility
control agents in water supply,” and in early March 2008 news reports
indicated that estrogen (which effects fertility) among other chemicals
had been released into the water supplies of 41 million Americans.

In
order to control populations, the power elite obviously has to be able
to track them. This will be reminiscent of the 1930s in which the Nazis
would request I.D. by saying, “Papiere, bitte” (Papers, please) of those
under its control. Everyone also had an Arbeitsbuch containing her or
his personal demographic, educational, occupational, etc. information.
Today in Communist China, a similar document is the “Dangan.” And by
2017 A.D., all British citizens will have a National I.D. card by.

In
the U.S., Arbeitsbuch-type information started to become available about
10 years ago via ALMIS (America’s Labor Market Information System),
which was developed by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and
Training Administration. The data tables in ALMIS contain information
about employment, occupation projections, wages, layoffs, employers,
educational programs, completers (of educational programs), population
demographics (e.g., who is located where), and selected economic indicators.

Relevant
to a national I.D. in the U.S., on January 11, 2008 Michael Chertoff
(head of Homeland Security) in a press statement said regarding the
“Real I.D. Act” passed by Congress: “There comes a point in time where
all the discussion and analysis has to stop…. The time has come to bite
the bullet…. Now if a particular state were to say, ‘We opt out: we’re
not going to participate at all,’ then the law is very clear: after
May of this year, that state’s driver’s licenses will no longer be acceptable
as a form of federal identification for getting on an airplane or getting
into a federal building….”

Advertisement

The
federal government plans to use these “machine-readable” state driver’s
licenses, with “uniformity” among the states, as federally-approved
I.D. cards. This will be followed by future federal demands upon the
public, and down the road if the people at some point refuse to bow
to these demands, they could be forced into submission by varying means.
Foreigners in our police forces might be used (the Associated Press
on May 16, 2007 reported that “the Santa Fe police department is considering
the possibility of recruiting Mexican nationals to fill vacant police
jobs”). Or the U.S. military could be used (such forces were used at
Waco against the Branch Davidians). Or foreigners in our military could
be used (THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR on December 26, 2006 published
“U.S. Military May Recruit Foreigners to Serve” by Tom Regan). Or foreign
troops could be used (USNORTHCOM reported that on February 14, U.S.
Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart signed an agreement with Canadian Air Force
Lt. Gen. Marc Dumais allowing US and Canadian troops to cross each other’s
borders during civil emergencies ­ note that “civil” can mean an action
by the American people and not just in response to an attack from abroad).
Or people could be labeled “domestic terrorists” simply by appearing
to intend to influence a politician’s pro-abortion policy, for example,
by saying they won’t vote for her or him (Section 802 of the Patriot
Act states that the “term ‘domestic terrorism’ means activities that
appear to be intended to influence the policy of a government by intimidation
or coercion”). Note that one doesn’t have to “intend to influence,”
but only “appear” that way to be considered a “domestic terrorist.”

Or
the President could simply label and imprison a person as an “enemy
combatant” whereby they no longer have any Constitutional rights. Regarding
this last possibility, it’s worth remembering that Winston Churchill
on November 21, 1943 warned: “The power of the Executive to cast a man
into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly
to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious
and is the foundation of all totalitarian governments whether Nazi or
Communist.”

Regarding
all of the aforementioned possibilities, why do you think the Federal
government has signed contracts amounting to $385 million with Halliburton
subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root to build vast new detention camps across
the U.S.? Both Democrats and Republicans repeatedly have said they don’t
plan to round up all the illegal aliens in the U.S., so for whom do
you think these massive new detention camps are being build? It’s not
just for a few foreign terrorists, so that only leaves “domestic terrorists”
however the power elite’s political puppets are ordered to define that
term. That could mean YOU! And note that the first of these single bid
contracts to a Halliburton (Vice-President Cheney’s former company)
subsidiary was signed in 1999 under the Clinton administration. The
power elite controls both Democrat and Republican leaders.

The
ability of the power elite to enforce its will, of course, reaches far
beyond the borders of the U.S. As an example of this, the assassinated
Benazir Bhutto’s father, Zulfiker Ali Bhutto, when prime minister of
Pakistan wrote IF I AM ASSASSINATED (1979). On page xxvii in the Introduction
to this book, one reads regarding his pursuit of a nuclear weapons program
that the outgoing American ambassador in Islamabad, Pakistan said “if
he (Bhutto) did not back down, he would no longer stay in power.” This
was confirmed by Tariq Ali (who personally knew Bhutto) in his THE CLASH
OF FUNDAMENTALISM (2002) on page 167, where the author write that Secretary
of State Henry Kissinger visited Bhutto in Lahore, Pakistan in 1976
and said “We can de-stablize your government and make a horrible example
out of you” if Bhutto continued Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program.
Tariq Ali then notes that Bhutto continued his program and six months
later was driven from office.

Today,
Kissinger supports Senator McCain for president, and his fellow power
elite agent Zbigniew Brzezinski supports Senator Obama. Senator Clinton,
of course, is part of the whole Rhodes scholar globalist network. But
how does the power elite keep the electorate from learning what Clinton,
Obama or McCain (each of whom has at least 5 prominent CFR advisors)
will actually do if elected? It’s actually very simple ­ keep news reporters
and the public focused on his or her supporters saying something controversial
(e.g., the comments of Geraldine Ferraro, Rev. Wright, and the talk-show
host in Ohio). As long as reporters cover primarily this, voters will
not learn what the candidates’ specific positions are on the issues.
For example, do we know anything besides the candidates’ general policy
proposals on the economy, Iraq, education, etc.? No. News reporters
haven’t pressed for in-depth details regarding any issue. Thus, the
power elite’s plan is working.

What
will likely happen in the area of education, for example, if a Democrat
is elected President are more decisions like that of February 28, 2008
by Appeals Court Judge H. Walter Croskey in Los Angeles. He ruled that
parents have no Constitutional right to homeschool their children, and
that students must be taught only by credentialed teachers. Judge Croskey’s
ruling looks very much like the National Education Association’s B-75
Home Schooling resolution at its 2007 convention. Since homeschooled
students typically have higher academic achievement test scores than
public school students, this issue is really about separating students
from their parents’ values. Former NEA president Catherine Barrett admitted
as much in the SATURDAY REVIEW OF EDUCATION (Feb. 10, 1973) when she
said teaching “basic skills” would be reduced to only one-quarter of
the school day, as “the teacher will be a conveyor of values, a philosopher….
We will be agents of change.”

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

At
the international level, CFR member Carol Bellamy, after being with
Morgan-Stanley and managing director of Bear-Stearns (recently sold
because of great financial trouble), became executive director of UNICEF
where she declared: “The U.N. position is… if formal education is not
supplied by government, a child’s right to schooling is violated. Home
schools are not a substitute for formal education.” (Bloomsburg, PA
PRESS-ENTERPRISE, May 15, 1998). The power elite at the global level
wants to eliminate homeschooling, and efforts toward that end have already
begun in Germany and other nations. The power elite simply cannot allow
parents (usually with traditional values of morality and patriotism)
to impart their values to their children. Only the public schools can
indoctrinate children with globalism and moral relativism, which are
necessary to condition the masses to accept a non-biblical World Socialist
Government.

Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political
analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy
has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic
risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior
Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.

Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress
on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or
edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles
appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post,
Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio
talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York
City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs
USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.