Her posture stands out because for so many women, when they sit, they cross. People tend to mimic each other's body language during a conversation, especially if they're trying to connect with one another. But even when Kagan sits across from Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who has her legs crossed at the knees, Kagan keeps both feet planted firmly on the ground. Her body language will not be bullied into conformity.

She does not cross her legs at the ankles either, the way so many older women do.

Yeah, we were taught, strictly, that a woman should cross her legs at the ankles and only at the ankles.

Instead, Kagan sits, in her sensible skirts, with her legs slightly apart, hands draped in her lap.

Here's the class picture from my kindergarten, around 1957:

Looks like the girl at the far left has Supreme Court potential. And I don't.

This post reminds me of an attorney I used to work for (I spent the last 11 years working as a paralegal). At that time, I was working at the largest, most prestigious firm in Seattle, and this lawyer was supposed to be a big deal.

Anyhow, I dreaded any meeting that found me sitting across from my boss without a table between us. She was fond of wearing stockings with garters (she was maybe mid-30's at the time and this was about 10 years ago). She had a habit of sitting with knees apart with her skirt hiked halfway up thighs - we all knew what color her underwear was on that day. I had to bite my tongue to keep from saying: "Do I really have to sit here in full view of your crotch?"

I think it's a silly thing to worry about. People should sit comfortably if they are working, even if that "working" is talking to people. This is one of the areas where I suppose I'm completely feminist. We fuss about foot binding in ancient China but we are determined to cripple ourselves with our clothing and shoes and hair styles. Fingernails. Even make-up. Carrying a purse.

Does anyone ever really think about how much a purse hampers us? We laugh at the classic homeschooler fanny-pack but it leaves two hands free for useful things. A clutch-purse is the ultimate in rendering a woman half crippled, add in shoes that can't be run in and she's fully dependent on others for anything remotely useful.

I don't see how skirts that require constant attention to crossed ankles in order to maintain one's dignity are any different.

There are practical reasons why women should sit with their legs together while wearing skirts that do not cover the knees.Crossing at the knees does not always make matters better. In a short enough skirt, it can make matters worse.

It isn't just a matter of convention. It's a matter of not being caught in a Sharon Stone moment (or even worse, perhaps, giving the world a glimpse of your big girl panties and cotton crotch pantyhose).

Well, not quite. The things people care about concerning women. It's not sexist, by the way. Which is the standard pablum whenever men or women express interest in seemingly irrelevant traits in a woman being considered for a position of great power and responsibility. It actually gives the game away. It tells us that the feminine has no place in the masculine world. Because the feminine deep down doesn't give a rat's ass about the concerns of the masculine world, which is to say the wider world, except...except when that wider world impinges on the feminine world.

As I am an elderly woman I was taught if you MUST cross anything,it should be the ankles. The hands should be lightly clasped in the lap.Also in today's fashion world women, including me, who are accustomed to wearing pants most of the time, clap their legs together to catch what falls into the so-called lap. If wearing a dress we are also able to do as the girls in Huck's day did it. We are MULTI- taskers, remember?

Michelle Obama is leading a crusade against exactly the type of person Elena Kagan is.

Elena Kagan is supposed to be an intelligent adult. And yet, she is unable to maintain an appropriate diet and exercise regimen.

Exactly why should we want someone this fucking stupid sitting on our Supreme Court? Someone who can't even manage their own diet? Someone who can't bother to exercise her fat self?

It's true: women can't do math. Elena Kagan is proof if this theory first exposed by Harvard President Larry Summers. If you taken in 4,000 calories a day, and you expend 500 calories a day, then you become the fat, obese pug that Elena Kagan has become. She clearly cannot do simple math or she would not be pulling the Moon out of its fucking orbit.

Look ... the government is running the health care system now. We have to start rationing. We're all paying extra because of these fat slobs like Elena Kagan who are unable to fucking restrain themselves and lead green lives.

Elena Kagan is killing the planet with her over-consumption of our planet's limited resources. She doesn't deserve a seat in our government.

We should not be rewarding such people. We should be pointing at them and laughing so that others will not be inclined to imitate these obese fucking slobs.

"To sit gracefully one should not perch stiffly on the edge of a straight chair, nor sprawl at length in an easy one. The perfect position is one that is easy, but dignified. In other days, no lady of dignity ever crossed her knees, held her hands on her hips, or twisted herself sideways, or even leaned back in her chair! To-day all these things are done; and the only etiquette left is on the subject of how not to exaggerate them. No lady should cross her knees so that her skirts go up to or above them; neither should her foot be thrust out so that her toes are at knee level. An arm a-kimbo is not a graceful attitude, nor is a twisted spine! Everyone, of course, leans against a chair back, except in a box at the opera and in a ballroom, but a lady should never throw herself almost at full length in a reclining chair or on a wide sofa when she is out in public... The proper way for a lady to sit is in the center of her chair, or slightly sideways in the corner of a sofa. She may lean back, of course, and easily; her hands relaxed in her lap, her knees together, or if crossed, her foot must not be thrust forward so as to leave a space between the heel and her other ankle."

To sit gracefully one should not perch stiffly on the edge of a straight chair, nor sprawl at length in an easy one. The perfect position is one that is easy, but dignified. In other days, no lady of dignity ever ordered three bacon double-cheeseburgers at Wendys, held her hands on her hips, or twisted herself sideways to scorf down a that fourth Gordita Grande, or even leaned back in her chair to inhale that last taco!

To-day all these things are done by Elena Kagan; and the only etiquette left is on the subject of how to get extra cheese on one's pizza.

"To sit gracefully one should not perch stiffly on the edge of a straight chair, nor sprawl at length in an easy one."

This assumes a whole heck of a lot about the height of the woman and the size of the chair.

The same sized chair does not "easily" fit a woman of five feet and a man of six three. I remember some entirely gawd awful thing that the Russians had set out for a female dignitary. If I'd sat in it I'd have been "perched stiffly on the edge" or in the center with my feet swinging or to the back with not more than my ankles and feet sticking straight out. For male dignitaries of significant stature the chairs were likely a wonderful change. (I'm guessing they were Historic, but there you go.)

Crossing your ankles with your feet slightly to one side and neither perched, sprawled or twisted only works on a chair that is slightly lower in the seat than your knee to feet length.

Kagan is said to be 5'3", which is not unusually short by any means, but she appears to have rather short limbs for her height. Combined with her being somewhat overweight (though far from obese), she probably has some difficulty crossing her legs in the knee-over-knee manner that's traditional for women.

It's not trivial. It might be in another twenty years. I am on the older end of Gen X. I was still trained by the aversion therapy known as "Junior High Cotillion" to sit with the ANKLES CROSSED. Even the legs crossed was considered racy.

I sit with legs crossed generally. I think it's more attractive, I suppose, but those memories of a 6th grade Patricia Dethlefsen looking clunky and yes, lesbian, might also be haunting my subconscious.

I don't see a connection with how she decides cases but I do see a connection with why she's not married. No matter how much of a girlie girl Maureen Dowd said she was, she had some social obliviousness in her - back to the girl geek argument.

This is the kind of thing, like makeup, that guys insist they don't react to, and they don't on a rational level, but they really do.

``There are practical reasons why women should sit with their legs together while wearing skirts that do not cover the knees.''

Amen to that. And as ALP pointed, short skirts + legs apart can treat the viewer to a whole lot more than the viewer wants to see.

That happened to me some years ago, while riding the Chicago El. We were stopped at the Damen Avenue station and on the opposite platform I could see a skinny girl wearing a short dress, sitting with knees apart. I could also see, without any effort, that she wasn't wearing any underpants.

If you're wearing long pants, it doesn't matter. If you're wearing a skirt, keep the knees together.

Prof. I would have to say that you have an amazing digital trial about your excellent journey. Terrific photo. There are 24-students (11 girls, 13 boys). Was that typical those days? Do you keep in touch with your class-mates? How many are lawyers? Perhaps, you will be Judge in some court some day.

Prof. I would have to say that you have an amazing digital record about your excellent life journey. Terrific photo. There are 24-students (11 girls, 13 boys). Was that typical those days? Do you keep in touch with your class-mates? How many are lawyers? Perhaps, you will be Judge in some court some day.

"Most of them wore see-through blouses or something similar and crossed their legs." Just reading Houellebecq's "Elementary Particles"- girls in the 70s could cross legs but accentuate sexuality in their breasts. Top open, bottom closed.