Wednesday, 25 March 2015

What's the deal with Jews and gun control?

The American obsession with owning guns has always been a source of amazement to me. Why would any civilian want to be armed like a commando or have a house resembling Woolwich Arsenal? And if hunting - i.e. killing animals for pleasure - is your thing then why not take a job in an abattoir? Having said that the gun control movement there makes no sense in that probably 95% of murders are committed, not by ordinary citizens, rather by criminals who will not be even remotely deterred by more restrictive legislation. So why the raft of legislation and supporting propaganda over the last twenty years or so?

And boy, what a tsunami it's been. Doing some research on the subject I was overwhelmed, staggered, by the sheer number and scope of the laws introduced over that time frame. Looking more closely I was also struck by the overwhelming Jewish role in the whole control movement. The big breakthrough came with the Gun Control Act of 1968 which was introduced by Emanuel Celler (who also did sterling work in opening America to the Third World tidal wave) while later on Senators Howard Metzenbaum, Herbert Kohl, Diane Feinstein, Arlen Specter, Joe Lieberman, Barbara Boxer and Frank Lautenberg continued the good work. Same thing happened in the House. And of course where would we be without good old Chucky Schumer and Mike Bloomberg, who never evergive the subject a rest?

And it's not just politicians. As far as I can see all of the major gun control lobby groups have major Jewish representation and financing, with the corollary that almost all major Jewish organisations support the restriction project. This from the Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility which represents a virtual who's who of leading "American" Jewish organisations including: "The Anti-Defamation League, Bet Alef, Congregation Beth Shalom, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Jewish Family Service, Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle, Kavana Cooperative, Kol HaNeshamah, National Council of Jewish Women, Stroum Jewish Community Center, Temple Beth Am, Temple Beth Hatfiloh, Temple Beth Or, Temple B’Nai Torah, Temple De Hirsch Sinai, Tikvah Chadashah, Herzl Ner Tamid, Temple Beth El and the Washington State Holocaust Education Resource Center."

Why would Jews be so hostile to private gun ownership? After all, they portray themselves - ad nauseam - as hapless hard-working victims of state-sponsored pogroms throughout history. But like so much of the Approved Version of History this trope doesn't stand up. In actual fact Jews have always managed to inveigle themselves into the role of eminence grise, at the side of or behind the actual rulers, as 'advisors', enablers, financiers etc. This role, so obvious in every Western country today, seems to have applied for centuries, even in Muslim regions. My own research into pogroms suggests that for the most part - there most certainly have been exceptions - but for the most part they've been spontaneous outbursts by the hoi polloi.

As an explanation for this apparent paradox I offer the experience of colonialism. Understand that every colonial power assigned top priority to disarming the colonised population. Check out this site to get an idea of the blood, treasure and variety of tactics (carrots, sticks, deception) deployed by the British Empire in separating the natives from their arms. Am I uncharitable in suggesting that Jews regard America as colonised territory, a territory in which their position relative to the general population is analogous to that of - for example - Whites in Kenya under colonialism? The nightmare scenario for the settler there was the prospect of being surrounded by well-armed Kikuyu or Matabele tribesmen. Which explains why West Bank settlers are armed to the teeth day and night. (A practice with which Feinstein et al seem, strangely, to have no difficulty.) So maybe in the fevered imagination of Jewish gun control advocates White Christians represent the natives outside the compound poised to slit their throats at the first opportunity.

99 comments:

Iron Felix
said...

Well now; gun control in the USA indeed. Oh yes; "everybody knows" that gun murders in the USA far outstrip those of any other country, and it is all due to the abundance of firearms. Fine---except that this is absolute nonsense. On a list of countries' rates of such murder the USA doesn't even make the first twenty, trailing even such oddities as Belarus and Latvia (let us not even mention South Africa). The abundance of firearms has nothing to do with it either. Anyone know of a country awash with high-powered weapons, where people are required by law to keep in their homes military standard weaponry and ammunition, yet where the gun-murder rate is negligible? Alright, you give up---Switzerland. The overwhelming number of gun murders in the USA are not committed by White middle-aged law-abiding men who like to do a little deer-shooting; they are overwhelmingly the work of young feral Blacks whose victims are other Blacks. Should the occasional shooter be White, however, even if he acted in self-defence, only then does the howl go up about the need for gun-control. It is a known fact that if gun control does come in the people who comply will be law-abiding White citizens; the gun-toting crims will not give a fiddlers fuck about gun control. The effect will in fact be to disarm and render defenceless the citizenry on behalf of the criminals.Are people not supposed to notice this?

I think that's exactly the reason from the TPTB's point of view but for the foot soldiers I think it's like everything else - they are instinctively hostile to the host and so oppose *every* aspect of the host culture from fashion to music to architecture - everything, it doesn't have to be important - it's like their paranoia makes them allergic.

Iron Felix. Good point about the rate of gun ownership not being a factor in murder rate. Many other European countries apart from the Swiss have very high rates of gun owndership where murder rate is also very very low.

I know about these traitors. I am also a Jew and I assure you not all Jews in America want their guns taken away. I have emailed and written to most of these elected officials to no avail. I doubt that they read anything contrary to their beliefs.

I urge you to reconsider your thoughts about Jews. Many are misguided and voted for Obama because Jews always voted for Democrats. Many have seen the light and are changing their mind. Obama can not count on the Jewish vote or contributions because of his treatment of Israel.

Professor Malcolm (an American, by the way) writes about not only the UK gun control movement -- and its origins -- but the erosion of freedom in the UK at all walks of life, including the right of juries, a few centuries ago, to utterly disregard direction by judges and magistrates and make their own decisions about the guilt or innocence of defendants.

She even writes on historical subjects like the movements through the centuries to disarm honest citizens of bows and even swords. A few reviews:

Joyce Lee Malcolm brings new evidence that guns reduce violence. Professor Malcolm's carefully researched book is a study of guns and violence in England from the Middle Ages through the present day. When the English were armed to the teeth, violent crime was rare. Now that the English are disarmed, violent crime has exploded. Indeed, crime in England is out of control.** (Paul Craig Roberts Washington Times 2002-07-30)

In addition to presenting the big picture with plenty of detail, Ms. Malcolm describes some of the more difficult aspects of this whole debate--changing definitions of crime, unreported crimes, wavering enthusiasm for strict law enforcement. Altogether she makes a forceful case, clearly and fairly. Even the most hardened anti-gunners...will want to read Guns and Violence, if only to see what ammunition their opponents now possess. (Kimberley A. Strassel Wall Street Journal 2002-08-06)

It is refreshing to see a study of the complex issues surrounding firearms in the UK played with a straight bat...[Malcolm's] book...breaks new ground in the debate...[and] tackles many of the myths surround the effectiveness of firearms controls in England...Well written and very readable. It also provides ammunition to counter the arguments of those who want to see Britain turned into a gun-free zone. It is also heartening to see a respected academic make a contribution to the firearms debate which is well researched, objective and based on intellectually sustainable conclusions. (Bill Harriman Shooting Times & Country Magazine 2002-11-21)

A really good read.

**Now that the English are disarmed, violent crime has exploded. Indeed, crime in England is out of control.

Congratulations Savant. I am now aware of three sites that have reblogged your piece the "Incredible Disappearing Man"https://murderbymedia2.wordpress.com/2015/03/25/the-incredible-disappearing-man/http://incogman.net/2015/03/the-incredible-disappearing-man/

I also seen it on the Daily Stormer But can't come up with the link at the moment.

Glen C's figures are probably correct but might better be viewed in context. Germany, and indeed Northern Europe, even now does not have the curse laid upon America this last half-century, though every effort is being made to bring this about. In America one has what is in effect a foreign country, one of fathomless hostility towards the host nation, populated by people known for their predisposition to crime and unreasoning violence. This foreign country is distributed all across the USA in necrotic wastelands, enclaves attached to every metropolis. These are commonly and falsely called ghettos, though there are no ghettos in the USA and never have been.This is a consideration which would, I feel, moderate the picture.The right "to keep and bear arms" in the US constitution was inserted into that admirable document because it was seen as a necessity to vest in the sovereign people the constitutional right to resist, by force of arms if need be, the threat of tyranny by their own government. It might be well to reflect that the abuse of this or any such admirable sovereign right is not ipso facto grounds for seeing that right as having been invalidated.

In England, if anyone suggests more free access to guns, the usual suspects start screaming that the country will end up "like America" if anyone can have a gun. But it wouldn't - it would be like England until 1920, which had no gun control apart from a licence you had to buy to carry one, which was a means of raising revenue, not controlling firearms (there were some technical restrictions, which could be legally circumvented).

America's attachment to guns goes back to colonial days, when communities lived in fear of savage Indian raids, and continued through the period of the Old West, where law enforcement was weak, at best. Even with different laws, no European country would have a gun culture like America's.

Anon 22.52. I know that there are many Jews like you in America. However you are in a small minority and the organizations that purport to represent you invariably take a different line. Therefore hard for the rest of us to avoid drawing these conclusions about what 'Jews' are up to on gun control.

@Anon 22:52: So the schwartze goy won't do as you say after you manouevred him into power on the back of the liberated schwartze goyim vote?

The Ashkenazi Jews don't have any right to any part of the Middle East.

This is typical Jewish behaviour throughout the centuries, to manipulate their host country to further their own interests which are ALWAYS detrimental to the host country! No Jew should be allowed to hold a position in any government. Not even in "Israel".

Savant said :'Am I uncharitable in suggesting that Jews regard America as colonised territory'.I think they are in control of the West not just America.The number of incidents that 'occur'and are cited by the gun control lobby is either suspicious or serendipitous. If it is the latter, then no wonder, others are the former.

Jews are among the strongest supporters of gun control, according to the American Jewish Committee.

• 92 percent of Jews support requiring a permit from police before purchasing a firearm, compared to 80 percent for the population as a whole.

• Jews have the greatest level of support for gun control among all ethnic/racial and religious groups. Jews are also the lowest of all religious groups in firearm ownership.

• Only 13 percent of Jewish households contain firearms (vs. 41percent for non-Jews) and just 10 percent of Jews personally own a gun (vs. 26 percent for non-Jews).

I have a graph somewhere here showing US rates of gun homicides per annum for the last century plus. Two things are striking:

1. During the period of the old "wild west", the rate was very low and steady.

2. In the modern period, rates have soared, coincidentally with each gun control measure introduced.

Savant,I know you've posted your email address many times, but I didn't save it. If you're interested, please post it again and I'll send you the image. Or, does anybody know a web site where I can upload images (and don't tell me Facebook)?

Finally, UN:

Those reviews are a bit disingenuous, and Roberts I'm sure, for one, knows better. The increase in crime in Britain after disarmament of the populace also coincided with that other development which was certainly a more significant cause.

The first International Russian Conservative Forum took place in St. Petersburg on Sunday.

ST. PETERSBURG — High-ranking members of some of Europe's most controversial parties descended on St. Petersburg on Sunday to participate in the first International Russian Conservative Forum, an ultranationalist convention glorifying Russia as a refuge for the world's most marginalized far-right political forces.

The forum's speakers collectively ticked off all the boxes of intolerance and anti-Western sentiment, egged on by the enthusiasm of the audience filling a conference room at the St. Petersburg Holiday Inn. Through the course of the day, U.S. President Barack Obama was called a Nazi, white Christians were urged to reproduce, gays were referred to as perverts and murdered Russian opposition activists were said to be resting in hell. Russia's Burgeoning European Ties

Although European Union leaders decided last week to uphold sanctions against Russia, the general appetite for snubbing Moscow seems to have waned among certain EU member states.

A string of European leaders have gone against the grain, calling for their own countries' rapprochement with Russia in spite of a year-old European Council agreement not to hold regular bilateral meetings with Moscow in response to its annexation of Crimea last March.

And you know the funny thing? I scoured every edition of the New Zealand Herald, and found not a word of this. I did, however, discover that "Over half of dead hip-hop artists were murdered, study finds" -- which is a start, I guess.

For those of you who have never read it,Google "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross. It's a novel, and a very large one, but is free on PDF and gives an excellent account of the erosion of US gun rights.

Point scoring and pointing out problems with immigration and corruption on the Internet achieves nothingGet your arses on the street for a just cause like oursWhite Christian man bleeds Or whatever you want to call it I am sick of snobbery between white peopleOh they are not well educatedOr they are rough and drink.. But they turned up you didn'tOh they are this and that I couldn't lend my supportOh don't kick off it will upset house pricesWell my fine friends if you have nothing in common with the people on the streetsthen maybe you have more in common with the people who oppose them and want your daughters

Or die a useless life and then a deathAnd I hope your great grandchildren on your death bed say grand dad this burka is hot why do I have to wear it and marry that old man

The results of the first round of France's departmental election on Sunday confirmed the international left's worst fears: the French left is experiencing a rapid decline.

In total, France's left-wing parties garnered 4,468,173 votes on Sunday, with the ruling Socialist Party of Francois Hollande getting less than 1.5 million votes.

France's right wing parties, on the other hand, gathered a total of 7,667,886 votes, as the Front National and UMP both topped the Socialist Party. Sunday's election results mirrored those seen in the 2014 EU Parliamentary elections in France, in which both the Front National and UMP both defeated the Socialist Party by considerable margins.

And despite what the liars and propagandists in the mainstream media report, the Front National (FN) actually received the most votes of any party in the country, as the graph above illustrates.

So as the media celebrated the UMP's "victory" over the Front National, they failed to mention that the UMP had to join a coalition of other right-wing parties to receive their result.

Granted, it may be imprudent to draw concrete conclusions regarding France's political landscape until the results of this Sunday's second round of voting are released, but I believe that it is safe to say that the right is rapidly rising in France, as the left continues its gradual disintegration.

Indeed, an RT article on Tuesday asked whether "the pendulum of French politics is swinging too far to the right", noting that a quarter of French citizens are consistently voting for the "ultra-right wing".

The article also noted that France's shift to the political right can be explained by the recent Charlie Hebdo shootings, as well as the fact that the number of Muslims in the country is now "more than the majority of French will put up with."

I don't remember reading this in the NZ Herald. Strange, that.

But all is not lost ... Angelina Jolie had her goolies whacked out. Wow.

A gunman in Philadelphia a couple days ago went berserk in a barbershop and started shooting the place up. Another guy saw it happening and came in with his legal gun and killed him.

Congress passed a maniac resolution a couple days ago authorizing a billion dollars in weapons for the Ukraine like 385 to 48. Leading the opposition was...wait for it...John Conyers, head of the black caucus. I'm willing to take leadership wherever I can get it. Especially to avoid war with Russia.

The petulant president declassified a 28 year old top secret report on Israel's nukes so now it's official that they have them. Also, I agree with 22:52 that there are a lot of "good Jews," so to speak. The monsters are animated by ideology, not race or religion.

Good law-abiding Americans won't be good law-abiding Americans anymore if the government comes for their guns.Plus, most of the country is rural and people need their guns to control the wildlife. Coyotes have made a comeback on the East coast and are nesting under people decks. And they're planning a second bear hunt next year here in Jersey.

Allan@Aberdeen. Yes, there is a group of jews who oppose gun control. They are the ones who bought up on the cheap some of the gun manufacturers when their share price went down after all the new anti-gun legislation. Now that they on the other side they oppose gun control.

UN, you failed to mention that this outburst was printed in the Moscow Times. Just to point out that most of the supposedly alternative news outlets to the western MSM are also fully signed up to the Globalist, PC, multicult agenda. This includes RT, Al Jazeera, France 24 etc.

The current "American Dream" is a bunker in Montana filled with AK-47s and Twinkies. Then, you'd be ready for anything: nuclear war, zombie apocalypse, race war, alien invasion.Now, if I can just win the lottery...

What are you going to do when the Muslims and Africans start knocking down your door OR when you can't leave the house to get food due to extreme violence outside? If you do not understand the fundamentals of freedom and self-defense, and their connection to each, then you should never question us Americans and our love affair with armaments.

Let me be very clear. The Second Amendment, by and large, was created to protect us from rogue government and every other benefit of this armament is an added bonus. What's your defense? You really don't have one. You, Mr. Savant, are at the mercy of others.

Why do we have so many weapons and so many "extreme" types of weapons? Never lose sight of your enemy and what they are capable of. Therein lies the answer.

Have you seen the destruction in Libya and Syria? Well, it's all coming home to you and to us in America sooner or later.

@ anon 01.12. I'm not questioning the impact of legally held guns which contribute minimally to gun violence. My initial point was to wonder why one would want to arm oneself to the teeth in a peaceable country.

As you say there will come a time, and it might be soon, when our African and Muslim enrichers lead us all to the view that yes, we need to be packing.

The American obsession with owning guns has always been a source of amazement to me. Why would any civilian want to be armed like a commando or have a house resembling Woolwich Arsenal? And if hunting - i.e. killing animals for pleasure - is your thing then why not take a job in an abattoir? Having said that the gun control movement there makes no sense in that probably 95% of murders are committed, not by ordinary citizens, rather by criminals who will not be even remotely deterred by more restrictive legislation. So why the raft of legislation and supporting propaganda over the last twenty years or so?-------------------

A good provocative start there Savant.

I'd say the White American love affair with guns started way back when having weapons determined whether you would fall, or not, into the hands of sadistic Indians who would routinely torture their captives death. In modern times there are blacks and their murderous behavior to deal with.

As you later point out in your post its jews who are the overwhelming force behind the ongoing push to disarm and make Whites helpless. Just another part of the jew strategy to destroy us and bring on the jew tyranny, that they will institute.

For a good read on jew tyranny I recommend a book called, Onwards Christian Soldiers, that I'm currently serializing at my blog. Despite the title it has nothing to do with Christianity and everything to do with organized jewry's machinations between the world wars, as reported by a Chicago Tribune reporter in the Baltic states.

Bringing it back to your post Savant, I recommend that everyone start to get themselves familiar with weapons of all kinds, even if it just reading about them. People insure their cars and houses against disaster, and we should do the same against the ever growing jew tyranny.

"Am I uncharitable in suggesting that Jews regard America as colonised territory, a territory in which their position relative to the general population is analogous to that of - for example - Whites in Kenya under colonialism? "

- Well that is undoubtedly part of it, but there are probably other factors at work as well. Some percentage of the white population in the US realizes that the economy is a house of cards ready to implode upon itself, and that the chaos following such an event will be accompanied by unbridled lawlessness (think; New Orleans after Katrina, for example). Also, we see that the country has become a police state and many are afraid of the police here-not that ownership of guns is any assurance of safety against cops armed to the teeth with M16's, MRAP's and body armor, but this contributes to the general apprehensiveness regarding eventual civil chaos. Then there is the day-to-day black crime to keep in mind, since the FBI estimates that 60% of American blacks go armed in some fashion at all times and it is the black population that presents the greatest danger to white people. Although nearly all whites may spout the approved PC blather when confronted about racial "equality", but at some level of consciousness (or subconscious cognition) they KNOW (caps for emphasis, not for "shouting") that blacks are violent and hate "whitey". Hence, the number of white people going about armed increases daily. There is the possibility that the forces that actually propel politics here want the white populace disarmed so that we are at the mercy of the black and brown hordes, and the example of South African Boer farmers is not lost on us. I personally do not discount the virulent hatred that Jews have for our people going to this extreme. Oddly though, the area of politics wherein whites have successfully countered the forces working against out interest is the area of gun control. This is almost exclusively due to the efforts of the NRA and this in itself is strange. There has been no other political issue wherein we have been able to act as a powerful political block and again, it has been NRA lobbying that has accomplished this. Laugh if you like, but this makes me wonder if it is not Jewish expertise (and networking) bought and paid for by the gun industry (which is huge here in the US) and the millions of dollars provided by NRA members which has been effectively countered the campaign against gun ownership in the US. You can be certain that Jewish interests in the firearms business is significant, and although Jews will vote in unison regarding "what is good for the Jews", still they are not monolithic on all issues. Perhaps this factors into the the long battle for gun control that the Jewish anti-gun forces have not won- yet.

Yes, it is George again; I wanted to add, by the way that I understand your position regarding hunting, and had to laugh to myself when I read your question "why do they not work in slaughter houses" if they like to kill animals? I understand the sentiment, but do not agree with it. As someone else mentioned, the animal populations sometimes require "managing". Deer for instance, are so plentiful here in Pennsylvania that automobiles colliding with them (at night, usually) is quite common. This, we call "road kill". There are many other similar examples, and I do not personally hunt, but I do not oppose another man or woman's right to do so. For me, hunting is a reason to own guns, and as such, I welcome it . I feel that the NRA's emphasis on this and other "sporting" purposes as reasons to own guns is misplaced, however since "self-defence" as a right should be the primary reason for claiming weapons ownershship. Self defense is an instinctive urge provided all life by nature, and by making this the primary defense for gun ownership we force the opposition to show its dark intent with regard to our future and its disregard for our lives.

Joshua Blakeney is a freelance journalist originally from the UK based in Canada. He has been Press TV's Canadian correspondent since April 2012. He is a co-host of The Real Deal radio show and co-founder of Non-Aligned Media. In 2014, after extensive archival research at the Diet National Library in Japan, Blakeney published Japan Bites Back: Documents Contextualizing Pearl Harbor, the topic of our discussion. Joshua begins with an overview of his journey into the world of WWII revisionist history, a subject that is far less taboo in Japan than it is in the west. He speaks about the backdrop of Japan as the perceived aggressor in the Pearl Harbor operation, and the threat of communism that went against Japan’s unique, homogenized and autonomous way of living. Joshua explains the history of Japan’s interests in preserving the Asiatic agrarian societies and the need to expel White influence. Then, we compare Pan-Asianist ideology to Iran’s attempt to unify its region today. Joshua makes connections to false flag events such as Pearl Harbor and origins of wars that have been interpreted in a fraudulent manner. In the members’ segment, we weigh up the magnitude of the history of nuclear weapons used to annihilate Japan by the US in sick demonstrations of power over the Soviet Union and the east. Later, Joshua illustrates Japan’s homogenous, tight-knit culture that strongly rejects New World Order policies and multiculturalism. We discuss the need for a 3rd position to view the imported problems created by mass immigration, along with the necessity for Muslims and Whites to avoid serving Zionist interests. At the end, Joshua describes how Japan’s connection to the land and collective spirituality has allowed the country to develop a superior culture.

For many years, the Jewnited Nations and various “human rights” groups have demanded that Japan pass laws against “hate speech”. Jews like Jake Adelstein (who writes a column for The Japan Times about Japan’s “racism”) and Erik Bleich have, of course, been pumping out columns about the need for Japan to ban “hate speech”, open its borders, and become multicultural.Japan now appears to actually be listening to the Jewish demands. It is currently attempting to pass a wide range of legislation outlawing “hate speech”.

English woman with what you guys call a posh accent on government communist public radio today talking about her book on aging which from gist of the interview has no new or interesting take on the subject. However, she did mention that she was the daughter of...wait for it...holocaust survivors.

I'd say it's an absolute necessity in America to get yourself a gun for self protection. I got mine! Anyone who doesn't think so, is in denial. Here's a couple of undeniable reasons for that need, and it's not limited to just these locations:

New York City, once America’s greatest and most famous metropolis, is now a crime-ridden hell where nonwhites commit 95% of all murders, 90% of all rapes, 90% of Felony Sex Crimes, 96% of all robberies, 91% of all Felonious Assaults, 90% of all Grand Larceny offenses, 86% of all Misdemeanor Sex Crimes, 90% of all Misdemeanor Assault and Related offenses, 87% of all Petit Larceny offenses, 84% of all Misdemeanor Criminal Mischief offenses, 96.6% of all Shooting offenses, and constitute 90.8% of all firearm arrests, 86.3% of all Drug Felony arrests, 82.3% of all Felony Stolen Property arrests, and 94.5% of all Felony and Misdemeanor Complaint Records with Identified Juvenile Victims, Suspects and Arrestees—all this according to official figures released by the New York City Police Department.

The Philadelphia Homicide Report: Blacks & Hispanics Commit More than 96% of the Murders in Philadelphia

The Philadelphia police published a report on homicides in Philadelphia in 2013 and 2012. Their data shows that the black murder rate is astronomical. Black black commit murder in extreme disproportion to their percentage of the population. What is more, white are disproportionately likely to be victims compared to their murder rate. This shows that many black murderers are killing white people. Philadelphia is 37% white, 44% black, 6% Asian, and 13% Latino and other. Of known perpetrators, blacks committed 83% of murders in 2012 and 80% of murders in 2013. Whites committed 3.4% of murders in 2012 and 4.3% of murders in 2013. This website has noted several racially charged hate crime/thrill kill style murders of white people in Philadelphia over the past few years.

In 2013, the list of homicide victims was twice as white as the list of perpetrators.

In most discussions, as this one about gun control (an issue of interest only as it can be made to apply to the USA; South Africa,Honduras, Latvia and others all get a free pass here)a question never seems to get asked. Nobody says, Well, who? All those gun murders in the US---well, who? Who is doing it? No; gun control is simply a GOOD THING, that's that. No cognisance need thereafter be taken of the fact that gun murder by the huge population of responsible White people legally owning firearms is negligible, and ubiquitous by contrast among the 13% population of tinted persons, most of whose weaponry is likely illegal. Immigration too; nobody asks, if we are to admit immigrants, well Who? If we are to have mass immigration who and from where might these be and come? No; you see IMMIGRATION IS GOOD, and that is the end of the matter. So no questions are allowed to be asked when swarms of sub-saharan jungle bunnies, each with thirty bogus credit cards, deplane on our territory. Like the legendary schoolteachers of long ago who would demonstrate their utter impartiality by beating their own sons into convulsions if not brain damage, so we must show our impartiality by disarming the law-abiding on behalf of an increasingly, weaponised and violent criminal class, and show our racial impartiality by deporting White South Africans who may have worked productively here for years whilst waving busloads of thieves and scammers straight through to the nearest social welfare office.Whom the Gods wish to destroy they first make mad.

Sponge Cake, the Halawa woman asks if the Govt. would do more if her brothers name was Paddy Murphy. I can answer that categorically---if his name was Paddy Murphy our Govt. would do absolutely fuck for him. You don't believe me? Ask any of the Birmingham Six.

This is all about globalization and marginalizing the indigenous population. The tipping point, as far as the elites are concerned, comes when 30% percent of the population is made up of diverse newcomers because the natives will always split politically. We've already reached this point in the US and that's why our politicians and media are borderline insulting. You are behind this curve in Europe but your elites seem even more arrogant and poisonous than ours.

- Anonymous said... For those of you who have never read it,Google "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross. It's a novel, and a very large one, but is free on PDF and gives an excellent account of the erosion of US gun rights.

mr.a

26 March 2015 at 22:54 -

'Unintended' would be presumably bad consequences yet one thing we know about jews is that 'unintended' (bad) consequences are INTENDED and foreseen by those who engender them. Let's not pretend that degradation comes by chance.

.If I may attempt to recreate a quotation I read years ago (and cannot find, right now) "He, who allows himself to be disarmed, among other things allows himself to become an object of contempt."

This goes back to Medici times.

Get yourself a firearm of some sort -- legally if if you can or any way you can, a few boxes of ammunition to go with it and don't tell anyone ... not even your wife.

In fact, especially your wife, if she should display -- even once --the kind of unthinking, casual spite seen in so many women today.

An interesting factoid; After the Aramoana shooting of 1990

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aramoana_massacre

The usual opportunists howled for tighter firearms laws in NZ, many wanting total confiscation.

It was during this period, I am informed by an old Bunnings hand (big local hardware supplier), that sales of six and eight inch PVC pipe went through the roof ... oddly enough, with a big demand for end caps.

And not only does the totally controlled jewsmedia empower, entitle, and enable these pavement apes by hidng the race of perpetrators from the general public, unless they're White European, of course, but the anti White US government confuses statistics by by classifying anyone who is not black,such as Mestizos as "White". Check out these "White" wanted criminals in Texas....

.- Anonymous said... For those of you who have never read it,Google "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross. It's a novel, and a very large one, but is free on PDF and gives an excellent account of the erosion of US gun rights.

I bought and read the book about ten or more years ago ... not really recommended. The author, one assumes in an attempt to cast the net as wide as possible, had several jewish heroes, a lesbian female lead and -- wait for it -- an honest and principled US president, who acted against iniquity and iniquitous legislation the moment it was pointed out to him

I like fantasy, but ...

Although, give the guy his due, he did have a jew anti-gun subversive who came to a particularly satisfying (and colourful) end in being dragged by a car at speeds of up to seventy MPH -- and then released.

.Okay ... in my last post, I supplied a link to the Aramoana massacre of 1990 (New Zealand).

We now move across the ditch (to use a colourful local expression) to the Port Arthur Massacre of 1996.

First, bearing in mind the truism that Wikipedia is rich in facts and amazingly poor in truth, I give you their version of events.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Arthur_massacre_(Australia)

Which, you will note, takes cognizance of the fact that (gasp!) not everyone swallows the official version, and even mentions (double Gasp!!) that there are (ta dada Daaah!) conspiracy theorists who have other views of what really happened.

Details here:

Conspiracy theories[edit]

At least two variants of a conspiracy theory about the massacre have been promoted.[36] As there was no dispute that Bryant was responsible for the Seascape murders, police made little effort to separately identify him for Port Arthur.[citation needed]

Interviewed in 2006, Tony Rundle, Premier of Tasmania from 1996 to 1998, admitted that because there was no trial the evidence made public was possibly insufficient to support that Bryant had been the gunman: "At the time, the view was that a trial could do no good for the victims and their families. Now I think maybe that wasn't the case. If all the evidence was heard, then maybe it would have provided some closure and stopped the proliferation of conspiracy theories that sprang up over the years."[37]

John di Carlo. Actually it gets even worse than that. The classification of Whites/Hispanics actually changes depending on circumstances. As you show here criminals are concerned a shit-stain greaser is classed as white. But in other areas like when it comes to AA and quota's they get classed as Hispanic.

Apparently, people are staying away from Hymie's shit movies, and he wants revenge! REVENGE!!! REVENGE!!!, I tell you.

Harvey Weinstein Urges Jews to Take on Anti-Semites: "Kick These Guys in the Ass"

11:49 PM PDT 3/24/2015 by Scott Feinberg, Tina Daunt

"We're gonna have to get as organized as the mafia," the mogul told the audience at the Simon Wiesenthal Center's national tribute dinner, where he was introduced by friend and competitor Jeffrey Katzenberg as "a really nice Jewish boy."

"We better stand up and kick these guys in the ass," movie mogul Harvey Weinstein said about present-day anti-Semites as he accepted the Humanitarian Award at the Simon Wiesenthal Center's National Tribute Dinner on Tuesday night at the Beverly Hilton. "We're gonna have to get as organized as the mafia," he continued. "We just can't take it anymore [from] these crazy bastards."

If you feel that there is any value in reading about one self-obsessed hebe shrieking on about antisemitism, please read on ... but don't blame me if you throw up. The rest of the article seems to be a race up each other's capacious arses

Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't the last few Weinstein flicks bombed rather badly?

"It was during this period, I am informed by an old Bunnings hand (big local hardware supplier), that sales of six and eight inch PVC pipe went through the roof ... oddly enough, with a big demand for end caps.

I bought and read the book about ten or more years ago ... not really recommended. The author, one assumes in an attempt to cast the net as wide as possible, had several jewish heroes, a lesbian female lead and -- wait for it -- an honest and principled US president, who acted against iniquity and iniquitous legislation the moment it was pointed out to him

It seems he may have been, at that time, a true believer; a bit of an idealist. He writes in the introduction

I believe that if the instigators glimpse what may lie ahead, they will alter their behavior before wholesale violence becomes unavoidable.

History does not support that view.

Strangely, though, I see him commenting occasionally on SBPDL, which is at least race-realist, if not yet Jew-wise (although many commentators there are). Maybe his views are evolving. Who knows, he may turn up here one of these days.

Analogman. SBPDL censors comments critical of jews. I know. I had several culled. Paul Kersye is trying to ride this particular shark.

------------------

SBPDL is a bit like Amren's Jared Taylor.

Taylor will talk your ears off as far as black and hispanic criminality and general dysfunctionalism is concerned. Yet as far as finding solutions to those problems by focusing on the root cause, aka, organised jewry's support for third world invasions and the black grievance industry, etc., he not only turns deaf, dumb and blind about the central role of jewry, he actually tries to minimize their role, effectively saying, "move along, there's nothing to see here".

SBPDL censors comments critical of jews. I know. I had several culled.

Oh, yes, I know. I've had many culled, too. Kersey is just trying to protect his income stream. He gets ad revenue from his blog. You can say anything you like about the kaffirs, just don't use "thuh N-word". Apparently there are bots on the web that search for naughty words, then advertisers (or Google) get hysterical demands from SJWs to pull ads. He reported a while ago that he'd lost a contract worth $3000 p.a. through that.

Some people still post mild criticism of jews, they just have to use code ("TWMNBN", Those Who Must Not Be Named). Nothing radical, though.

He has a couple of other taboos. Don't link to, or promote Harold Covington. And, oddly, don't criticise bikers.

My brother is not like me. I don't understand him. His kids, one in particular, are worse. When the government told me I could only own one gun and had to get rid of one of my Browning 9mm Hi-Power pistols, I offered the surplus one to my brother. He didn't want it. I eventually gave it to a dealer for nothing.

Some people just can't be taught. Their brains are built differently. This guy Jefferies was beaten in his own home, his girlfriend threatened with rape (obviously they weren't kaffirs), and his reaction: "Maybe I need a bigger padlock".

It's not about keeping them out of your house. A bigger lock on your door is useless, anyway, if they build houses in Australia like they do in America and New Zealand - out of sticks and paper. A determined burglar can come through the wall.

No, the point is, if the bastard breaks in and threatens my family, I want to be sure he doesn't do it with impunity.

If Julie Cruse had had a gun, she might still have been tortured and murdered. They might have caught her in the bath. I don't know, maybe she did have a gun. But she would have had a chance. Moral of the story: get a bigger lock and a gun.

UN, do you remember a SA writer, in the Sunday Times, I believe? I forget his name. He used to write the rainbow nation propaganda column. Lived in the typical upmarket mansion, high walls, razor wire, alarms, floodlights. Lots of locks. Armed response monitoring. One night the kaffirs came, he got shot but survived. Afterward, he still insisted race had nothing to do with it, they're just like us, could have been anyone.

Then, one day, he had a brainstorm. Wrote a column speculating on what South Africa would have been like if the White men had never come. An idyllic land, where Babuntus lived close to nature in their traditional ways, but with something indefinable missing.

Then one day an aircraft lands and the Chinese alight. The kaffirs realise what has been missing, and at last their lives are complete.

Anonymous said: “I agree with 22:52 that there are a lot of "good Jews," so to speak. The monsters are animated by IDEOLOGY, not race or religion.”

I assume by “monsters” you’re referring to members of the organised Jewish community in Western Europe, North America and Australasia.

Questions:

If these “monsters” (members of the organised Jewish community in Western Europe, North America and Australasia) are motivated by IDEOLOGY, why aren’t they lobbying for/demanding open borders for Israel?

If these “monsters” (members of the organised Jewish community in Western Europe, North America and Australasia) are motivated by IDEOLOGY, why aren’t they promoting multiculturalism in Israel?

Why do Jewish political organisations lobby for/demand open borders for Western Europe, North America and Australasia but not for Israel?

UN, do you remember a SA writer, in the Sunday Times, I believe? I forget his name. He used to write the rainbow nation propaganda column. Lived in the typical upmarket mansion, high walls, razor wire, alarms, floodlights. Lots of locks. Armed response monitoring. One night the kaffirs came, he got shot but survived. Afterward, he still insisted race had nothing to do with it, they're just like us, could have been anyone.

AnalogMan, this may sound weird, but my memories of ZA (except for the truly outrageous ones) fade by the day. It's very much like a bad divorce.

Keiser.Let's be honest. Not all white people are nice. We have our share of criminals. Perhaps our percentage is not as high as other groups but we have them.What is odd that our rapists choose not to rape blacks. It might be that they don't want to go into ghettoes. Even so they must still have ample opportunity. Sorry to be so crude.I would like to go into this further but , hey, there's a ski mask here that needs wearing.

Political Correctness acts like a gigantic spider which sits on a web that covers all of Western Civilization. When certain words or ideas are aired it sets off a vibration in the web that alerts the spider to a problem and the source of the vibration is swiftly neutralized. Whatever 87 year old Roger Moore meant when he said James Bond should be ''English, English'' hardly matters, the tremour sent out was that Moore had implied a popular fictional character which was invented by white people, played by white men, represented white men as guardians of white civilization, should actually remain white and not become ethnically African. The spider sprang to life and Moore, like so many before him, was quickly reduced to ''Oh, hey wait, I didn't mean that, not me......''.

The idea of James Bond becoming black has been around for some time, it is the logical conclusion to the steady influx of ''Progressive'' ideology that has been inflicting Bond for at least 20 years. When Pierce Brosnan landed the role of the worlds most famous spy his boss became a woman (Judi Dench) who called him a ''misogynistic dinosaur''. Bond stopped smoking and cried, he was emotionally damaged and needed to talk. M told Bond he was a ''relic of the Cold War'' which is ironic because after spending decades fighting Commie plots the new, cultural form of Marxism, was proving to be a threat Bond simply couldn't deal with because they had become his ''values'' and by the looks of it Bond himself will morph into an entirely new race to fit in with the new dogma.

White men should never hold elected positions in British universities again

Nothing is ever going to change if we keep letting them run everything, says our writer, and powerful women and minority ethnic people are needed

ANONYMOUS

Friday 27 March 2015

University is supposed to be amazing, a transformative experience which is informed by student unions across the country. Yet people don’t give a toss about their student unions, no one cares about the NUS, and activism is dying at all but a few hardcore universities. This generation of students has been pissed on by the government and fees, and privatisation, and all anyone seems to want to do is roll over and let it happen.

Do you know why this is? It’s because our universities and student unions are too similar to our government; they are too stunted by white men. White men might want to appropriate injustice as theirs, desperate for something to struggle against, but it’s a hobby they’ll pick up and drop as soon as the first comfortable finance job beckons them over

We need to ban white men and their activism dilettantism from student unions. We need powerful women and minority ethnic people to bring their passion back to the heart of student politics. Being a student union president should no longer be a place for privileged whiteboys to swing their dicks around before graduating into a world that is in no way affected by what they claim to fight for.

More importantly, we obviously live in a world that looks favourably on white men. In order to bring about change in our racist and sexist society, it must start in our universities. If women and minority ethnic people were in positions of leadership across all universities in the country, we would have a diverse graduating class of future leaders in every industry.

“Oh but, it’s racist to ban someone on the basis of their skin colour, and sexist to ban them on their gender,” cry the assembly chorus of confused souls trying to turn the language of progress into a weapon to further entrench the establishment. It’s not. You’re at university, go and ask a humanities professor. Learn something.

White men have had the last several millennia in charge, and it’s been a s***show from start to finish. A new generation of powerful women and minority ethnic people is ready to lead and change. It is time for you to bow down.

* The author is a British journalist

The author's name revealed is unsurprisingly a member of the tribe of death Tom Mendelsohn.

When "M" became a woman in the James Bond series, I knew that the English men had indeed gone down the crapper hole. Bond even has a black women as a cohort in the last film. Alas, even the "Bond women" are finished.

'White men should never hold elected positions in British universities again'.As I said on D.S. racist, sexist and anti-democratic in one sentence.Strange that it's said that Jews are not an organised group that favour their own. It would be impossible to be that organized. Somehow white men are capable of doing it though.

But just what is it that prevents Elba from being 'English-English', Roger? He was born in Hackney, raised in East Ham, schooled in Canning Town, started work in Dagenham and he supports Arsenal.

How much more of an ENGLISHMAN could he be?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3015563/SEBASTIAN-SHAKESPEARE-Idris-Elba-t-Bond-isn-t-English-English-says-Roger-Moore.html#ixzz3Vmoyfllo

Sony Pictures, 13 April 2011

PRESS RELEASE

Sony Pictures Entertainment will remain in the JAMES BOND business after reaching an agreement with MGM [Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer] to co-finance and theatrically market and distribute Bond 23 worldwide, it was announced today by MGM [Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer] Co-Chairmen and Chief Executive Officers Gary Barber [JEW] and Roger Birnbaum [JEW] and Sony Pictures Chairman and CEO Michael Lynton [JEW] and Co-Chairman Amy Pascal [JEW].http://www.sonypictures.com/corp/press_releases/2011/04_11/0401311_mgm.html

JEW Amy Pascal forced to apologize after she joked that President Barack Obama only likes movies about slaves or with a black lead.

RadarOnline also reports that in one email she says TV deals are the new 'black baby' in Hollywood -which Radar says is a jab at stars who adopt African and African American children.

JEW Pascal was responsible for greenlighting the new 'Annie' film featuring BLACK LEADS - including in the TITLE ROLE. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2876386/Hollywood-like-Rocky-Mountains-higher-goes-whiter-looks-Al-Sharpton-blasts-Sony-exec-Amy-Pascal-racist-hacked-emails.html#ixzz3Vn8ZaE69

USA TODAY, 28 April 2014

[JEW] Donald Sterling donated money for years to the Los Angeles chapter of the NAACP [National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]...

The entertainment business is rough. It's an industry lousy with SHARKS, EGOMANIACS, BACK-STABBERS, CROOKS, LIARS, CHEATS, FRAUDS, and just plain bastards. And once in a while ... once in a very great while, you get a nice [Gentile] guy. A Dick Cook. Congratulations, Dick.http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/crosby022202.asp

Re ‘White men should never hold elected positions in British universities again’

The Independent pulled the article.https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=ssl#q=%22White+men+should+never+hold+elected+positions+in+British+universities+again%22

The Internet Archive

White men should never hold elected positions in British universities againhttp://web.archive.org/web/20150328024157/http://www.independent.co.uk/student/istudents/white-men-should-never-hold-elected-positions-in-british-universities-again-10138945.html

It seems the British Blog operated by Rufus has been presumptuously removed from Blogspot. Too popular for alerting the masses of jewish perfidies, I suppose. Hopefully, he can resume with his great writing skills on Wordpress.

Although the following author may be fictitious, the narrative is spot on:

“The Gun Is Civilization” By Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret)

Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.

In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat – it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed.

People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.

People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level.

The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.

When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation… And that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.

Ordinary street cops in Britain and New Zealand are not given the authority to carry guns while carrying out their lawful duties, so they're woefully out-gunned without benefit of any "force equalizer".

The overwhelming number of gun murders in the USA are not committed by White middle-aged law-abiding men who like to do a little deer-shooting; they are overwhelmingly the work of young feral Blacks whose victims are other Blacks.

There are numerous websites which chronicle black violence in America, especially inter-racial crime. This one is especially good because it analyzes the political implication:

In England, if anyone suggests more free access to guns, the usual suspects start screaming that the country will end up "like America" if anyone can have a gun.

What will make England "like America" is not guns, but the importation of third world hordes, especially Africans. This will create crime, urban decay, and racial violence. Look at riots Britain experienced not too long ago, or the various car burnings which have taken place in many European countries.

As noted, what causes the high crime rates in the USA is not guns; it is the large numbers of blacks. This is demonstrated by numerous crime statistics. But this reality does not fit into multicultic ideology, so it goes down the Minitru Memory Hole.

If you want to keep crime under control, you have to keep the third world out of the first.

Whilst your political understanding is usually excellent, and your acumen with the language exemplary, you obviously have NO understanding of hunting, nor quite frankly, liberty. An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed one a subject.Jews want weapon confiscation to create more easily controlled goyim worker subjects.