Vegas Shooter Stephen Paddock Brother Arrested for Child Porn

Bruce Paddock, brother to the perpetrator of the Las Vegas mass shooting, was arrested in North Hollywood allegedly for crimes relating to child
pornography and sexual exploitation of a minor, according to multiple reports.

Bruce Paddock was one of Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock's three brothers, albeit estranged from the family. Earlier this month, Stephen
Paddock killed 58 people and wounded hundreds more using a modified semi-automatic gun fired from the window of a Las Vegas hotel room. Stephen
Paddock committed suicide after his massacre, leaving little evidence as to his motives. Since the massacre, there has been a flurry of interest both
in understanding the shooter's motives and on gun law reform. Little progress has been made on either front.

This was not the first time that Bruce Paddock had faced criminal charges; indeed, NBC News reported that "Bruce Paddock has a criminal record
stretching back to the 1980s, with convictions for vandalism, criminal threats, theft and driving with a suspended vehicle and other arrests for which
he was not convicted."

Bruce Paddock is not to be confused with shooter Stephen Paddock's other brother, Eric Paddock. Eric Paddock became the focus of media attention after
giving a lengthy emotional interview on the front lawn of his Florida home days after the shooting. The shooter also has a fourth
brother named Patrick Paddock who lives Tucson, Arizona.

Patrick Paddock told the New York Times in a recent interview that Stephen Paddock was "the most boring one in the family ... He was the least
violent one in the family, over a 30-year history."

It seems unlikely that Bruce Paddock faced new police scrutiny as a result of the media focus on his family, as many of the charges against him
appear to date to 2014. An NBC affiliate reported that the Los Angeles County criminal complaint listed "20 potential counts" for Paddock, which
included "19 counts of sexual exploitation of a child and one count of possession of child pornography."

I have a sneaking suspicion that it's connected somehow and not just a coincidence or an example of how the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Deep state contractors and underworld operators they deal in these things both as theistic satanists (some of them) and to compromise people..

Where was Paddock getting all his money to gamble away millions and take tons of cruises and whatnot, while owning a non-descript home that no one
really lives in.

The whole thing stinks to high heaven imho, and it's rather curious that we're not getting any more info from the comprehensive investigation everyone
was promised.

This link to child exploitation and pornography via his allegedly "estranged" brother (not the one on TV), to me it looks like a connecting thread of
some kind..

There, what I found about this, now going to read the thread discussion.

I think we're getting closer to the take down of the whole pedophile and pedo-satanist network, in LA, DC, NYC, Chicago, among other places.

And when it happens the mainstream media will hang themselves out to dry by labelling it a new "satanic panic", as they have to report later on the
various perp walks of high profile and otherwise well placed people.

originally posted by: denybedoomed
Threads like this remind me to tread lightly on this site. IF it was planted, it could happen to ANY of us. . .

Be careful what you post on Reddit. Trust me on this one.. They'll try to eat you alive.

But by the grace of God went I.

But I think their time's up, their sick party, over.

It's pretty heavy duty stuff you're right.

I've deduced that the only way to take a proper stand is to get right in the devil's face and grab his beard for a knee slam, only to see it fall
apart in your hand as so much fluff and ugly nonsense.

Righteous anger and a rising tide of Civil conscious awareness along with a chain of evidence, will chain this beast and toss it wailing, headlong
into the abyss (which means oblivion) for 1000 years, at least.

I find it odd the way these things are bubbling up in much the same way that it was strange and unexpected that Trump beat Clinton in the election.

Strange times. I hope that Jeff Sessions forgets about the potheads and wakes TF up.

It's time, the time has come. We're ready. We can face this thing down.

originally posted by: denybedoomed
Threads like this remind me to tread lightly on this site. IF it was planted, it could happen to ANY of us. . .

Be careful what you post on Reddit. Trust me on this one.. They'll try to eat you alive.

But by the grace of God went I.

But I think their time's up, their sick party, over.

It's pretty heavy duty stuff you're right.

I've deduced that the only way to take a proper stand is to get right in the devil's face and grab his beard for a knee slam, only to see it fall
apart in your hand as so much fluff and ugly nonsense.

Righteous anger and a rising tide of Civil conscious awareness along with a chain of evidence, will chain this beast and toss it wailing, headlong
into the abyss (which means oblivion) for 1000 years, at least.

I find it odd the way these things are bubbling up in much the same way that it was strange and unexpected that Trump beat Clinton in the election.

Strange times. I hope that Jeff Sessions forgets about the potheads and wakes TF up.

It's time, the time has come. We're ready. We can face this thing down.

At the risk of repeating myself, we are dealing with a family which has a rich history of mental illness. The Paddock brothers father, was a confirmed
psychopath. As I pointed out in several threads pertaining to the mass shooting in Las Vegas, the expression of psychopathy is caused by a
combination of genetic propensity and environmental stimulus. One must possess both the gene, and be effected by ones circumstances in such a way
(normally during childhood), as to produce a psychopathic mindset in the individual.

Since the Paddocks father was a known figure in their lives, and was definitely a psychopath himself, his sons will almost certainly have had the
gene, and will, through exposure to their father, have been made to feel rejected, neglected, and other negative things, as a result of his regular
incarceration and therefore presence, then absence from their lives. This presence, then absence of a father figure, would be damaging enough to a
child who did NOT possess the gene which dictates ones potential for expressing psychopathy, but in a child who has the gene, it is almost CERTAIN to
create the sort of psychological status which results in aberrant behaviour, and the development of the psychopathic mindset.

It should, therefore, be no surprise what so ever, that Stephen Paddock is not the only one of his siblings, to express some form of mental
abnormality. He turned his hand to mass murder, Bruce appears to have indulged in depraved and sickening perversions. If Eric, the fellow who, when
interviewed, suggested that he had no idea what might have led his brother to commit mass murder, has avoided becoming something grossly depraved and
amoral himself, I would have thought that this is either down to a vast amount of high quality psychological assistance, or a simple statistical blip.
That being said, there is something off about him too, as any informed examination of his interviews will attest, so it is probable that, while
possibly being of the psychopathic sort, he has simply trained himself not to indulge in acts of violence, despite being the same sort of broken as
his brothers seem to be, or have been in Stephen's case.

This sounds awfully fishy. It just so happens that some unknown tipster knows this guy has child porn on his personal computer. What the hell??? No
one else finds that odd? If at all true wouldn't the police be interested in HOW does this unknown person know this?? I would have to agree on tactics
used. Child porn is fast way to get a swat truck rolling with warrant in hand. It really does sound like they have no real answer to all this and
they're just flinging everything at the wall to see what sticks. Everyone is in shock and awe that this happens, but when you really get the core of
things it's everything it's our society that pushes people over the edge. The economy and this house of cards government that runs this $#!# show
knows this. They know a big crash is coming again and they hide the truth about it. When all this kicks off, of course they don't want citizens to be
armed. When you look back 30-40 years ago nothing like this EVER happen. Even before weapons bans. It's the squeeze and when you do that long enough
something is going to break sooner or later.

1. His father was called a psychopath in the dark ages of science and may have actually suffered from something else that we didn't know then. Even
autism was unknown at that point really.

2. Plenty of psychopaths or bad people in general can have normal children.
So far the children we know, one apparently killed 50odd people, another is pedophile, another did strange behaviour on the news (nothing psychopathic
though) and a one who's into dressing in animal suits.

On the face of things they are a strange bunch, is it because of their father? Maybe. My problem is they've all lasted until their 60s before
committing/being found out about their crimes.

If just way too fishy, the timing, the ages, the motive, the crimes, the timelines that follow.

Something is off. Something that can't be explained away as "but their father was a psycho"

MSM has already mentioned this in other mass shootings...amazingly not one recovered!

He is not the first mass shooter to destroy or hide digital clues. In 2007, Virginia Tech shooter Cho Seung Hui removed the hard drive of his
computer and disposed of his cell phone shortly before the massacre. Authorities even searched a pond for the missing digital media, but the devices
were never recovered.

The 2008 Northern Illinois shooter, Steven Kazmierczak, removed the SIM card from his phone and the hard drive from his laptop, and neither was
recovered.

In 2012, Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza had removed the hard drive from his computer and smashed it with a hammer or screwdriver.

I think its worth pointing out, that it is actually very easy to dispose of something the size of a hard drive, and even easier to dispose of
something like a flash or thumb drive. People throw away tonnes and tonnes of trash every day, landfills and other waste processing facilities take
material through the recycling procedure all the time. Once a thing has been put through such a process, or better yet, simply discarded in a lonely
spot, its damned near impossible to know where that disposal occurred, unless the subject was already under surveillance, at the time of their
disposing of the materials concerned.

I could believe this man had illegal content on his PC. No demographic or profession is immune to people who for whatever reason delight in such
depravities. My real concern though, is the line "a tip to cops" .

I will bet anything that tip in fact came from the NSA while freely and with no resistance with ease accessed his computer searching for any other
evidence that may link his brother to terrorism or a motive, other than the fact that brain hacking is real, scientifically documented, and warned
about the day before the shooting. Of course real documented factual science is typically ignored. People tend to fear facts that support CT's
. Nobody actually wants the truth, they just enjoy speculating theories. But when a real scientifically documented program to remote control the brain
is not only proven, but actively funded by the G7 funding arm for dangerous science, well we have to step away and ignore it or those vehicles pop up
again following you all over town.

Anyways, I have seen this line several times not only in relation to national stories about illegal content, but in local stories.

Either a tip was received, which they do not elaborate on, or the story simply says "officials did not elaborate or provide details as to how they
discovered the individual had illegal content on their computer".

It should be no stretch at all to understand the NSA will pass tips on to local agencies when they find this kind of material as they rummage through
your digital sock drawer/closet in search of threats to America.

What is for sure the interview(s) clips I saw that first day, that's one shady dude with a guilty conscious.

Please show me the video where the brother who is the subject of this video was interviewed? That's Brian as opposed to Eric, Eric being
the brother whom gave the interviews on the first days and seemed a little cookey, as has been pointed out several times already on this thread.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.