One more thing. You can go ahead and use the program, but would you please leave a message in the edit summary like ''"wikified using automated program"'' or such? --[[User:Explorer09|Explorer09]] 02:17, 27 October 2010 (CEST)

Revision as of 00:17, 27 October 2010

I'm putting the readmes for each version on subpages, else this page is going to be insanely hugeRun! 15:16, 25 June 2008 (MST)

Remind me why do we even have to put the English ReadMe on the wiki --Vladimir 03:42, 26 June 2008 (MST)

It's a convenient place for reference, also it would help with translation projects if people could simply keep a section of this page open in a tab while translating into another page. I'd find this useful if i want to look something up anyway (which i sometimes do and can't be arsed to go trundling into my WA folder to find the readme).

Though perhaps more useful would be sorting all the changes, particularly the features, into their respective department (maps, chat features, interface and stuff) but that would take forever so probably won't happen for a long time. Run! 08:22, 26 June 2008 (MST)

Page title

Can we also translate the page title of the readmes, so that we may have something like "Worms Armageddon 讀我" as a page title instead of "Worms Armageddon ReadMe (Traditional Chinese)"? —Explorer09 06:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Automation

Before anyone spends a considerable amount of effort on these pages, please be informed that I've written a program which can parse the ReadMe and output text in a variety of formatting, including MediaWiki. I plan to run the latest ReadMe through the program and merge the content of existing pages with that generated by the ReadMe, and automate any differences, to allow easy maintenance in the future.

Explorer seems to think that the blue formatting used in the ReadMe should be removed, because it can be confused with links. I suggest replacing it with another shade of blue.

Bells and whistles such as templates for the [CS/DC] tags are nice but not really necessary, considering that the maintenance will be mostly done by a program.

The blue formatting is easily be confused with links - that's real. I forgot to tell you about this before the release of the update. My idea was to avoid text coloring in WKB (or other online places, including the forum) and try another kind of emphasis. However if you still like coloring, how about using green or teal? Anyshadeofblue is still confusing. Purpletoo. (← You'll know what I mean if you click the colored text unintentionally)

For the [CS/DC] templates, first if you looked at the template code of those tags, you could see that I added rollover titles. (sample: [CS][DC]) Second, I believe that using templates would be more readable in page source

* {{CS, DC}} Hardware and Operating System compatibility
** {{CS}} Windows 98/ME compatibility, which was accidentally broken in v3.6.29.0, has been restored.
** {{CS}} Minimisation support in the front end in Windows Vista was incomplete (upon restoring, it
was not possible to interact with UI elements using the mouse).
** {{CS}} W:A now uses a new method of restoring the palette, which has been found to be more
effective on Windows Vista and Windows 7. Should the display palette become corrupted, the user can try to
restore it manually in-game by pressing '''Shift+Pause'''.

rather than

* <small>[CS, DC]</small> Hardware and Operating System compatibility
** <small>[CS]</small> Windows 98/ME compatibility, which was accidentally broken in v3.6.29.0, has been restored.
** <small>[CS]</small> Minimisation support in the front end in Windows Vista was incomplete (upon restoring, it
was not possible to interact with UI elements using the mouse).
** <small>[CS]</small> W:A now uses a new method of restoring the palette, which has been found to be more
effective on Windows Vista and Windows 7. Should the display palette become corrupted, the user can try to
restore it manually in-game by pressing '''Shift+Pause'''.

One more thing. You can go ahead and use the program, but would you please leave a message in the edit summary like "wikified using automated program" or such? --Explorer09 02:17, 27 October 2010 (CEST)