Kabanov, P.A..
Public discussion of issues of fi ghting corruption
as a form of interaction of the civil society institutions
with the public government bodies in the process
of public control implementation
// Law and Politics. – 2014. – є 10.
– P. 1515-1524.
DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.10.12998.

Review: The object of studies involves public discussion of the issues of fighting corruption as the form of interaction
of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of implementation of public control. The
goals of the study involve the following: 1) discussing elements of public discussion on fighting corruption as the form of
interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control implementation;
2) providing structural analysis of the main elements of the public discussions of the issues regarding fighting corruption
as a form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control
implementation; 2) to offer the vision of the author regarding public discussions on issues regarding fighting corruption
as a form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control
implementation. The methodological basis for the study involves dialectic materialism and the general scientific cognition
methods based upon it, including structural analysis, etc. The scientific novelty of the study is due to the fact that for the
first time in the Russian scientific literature the author views the public discussion of issues of fighting corruption as a
form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control implementation,
discussing its contents, providing its scientific definition, which may be used for the further scientific studies.

Review: Since the Russian state is turned towards market relations, itТs a popular misconception that a cultural object can be moved, changed and rebuilt without much difficulty. In this article by A.N. Panfilov based on analysis of a wide range of sources he shows the reason why it is impossible to establish more or less exact quantity of historical objects and their condition, formulates provisions on improvement of the situation in this sphere. The author establishes the need for the change in the approaches towards safeguarding objects of cultural heritage in historical settlements, offers ideas for regulating such work at the federal level

Review: The article includes analysis of the social opinion polls on corruption among the people living in the city of Vladivostok. The author provides comparative analysis of studies in 2004 Ч 2008, analyzes a number of blocks of information, which in turn establish a problem of uncovering corruption and attitude to corruption

A. P. Fokov,V. V. Luzin..
Semi-Presidential Model of Division of Power (the Example of France). Parliamentary Model of the Division of Powers (the Example of Great Britain).
// Law and Politics. – 2000. – є 10.

Copyright protected by law. Any materials may be published only subject to Publisher's concent.
All rights to the work, which was published under the name of our publishing house reserved. No part of the works published in printed or electronic editions, books and periodicals, on disks or digital and magnetic media, or on websites www.nbpublish.com, www.history-illustrated.ru, www.aurora-group.eu, www.e-notabene.ru can not be reproduced, translated into another language, stored in printed form or in any other way turned into another form of data storage, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or other - without the prior agreement and written permission of the publisher. And even if this was allowed to copy the copyright owner, links to the publisher and its publications are required.
For the content of advertisements published edition is not responsible. Editors reserve the right to place materials and journal articles in electronic legal systems and other electronic databases. The author can notify the Editor of their disagreement with the similar use of its materials no later than the date of the signing of the numbers in print.
Editorial respects the opinion of the authors of the published articles, but their views are not always the opinion of the publisher.