Thursday, 26 September 2013

Christians are being slaughtered across the Islamic crescent
of the Middle East and down into Africa. We hear of daily outrages against
Christians and their churches. Two Islamic suicide bombers blew themselves up
outside an ancient church in Peshawar in Pakistan killing eighty one Christian
worshippers. This is yet another bloody assault against non-Muslims in the name
of Islam that has plagued Pakistan for over a decade.

In Egypt it is estimated that over two hundred churches have
been attacked and destroyed by Muslims. Christians have been killed and many
others are fleeing Egypt. Morsi, the failed Muslim Brotherhood leader of Egypt,
blamed Christians for his downfall. This led to a rage of violence targeting
Christians in their homes and in their places of worship.

In Nairobi’s Westgate Mall, non-Muslims were selected for
execution for not being Muslims. Fortunately, Israeli Jews managed to escape
the carnage leaving Christians to be shot to death for not knowing the name of
Mohammed’s mother.

These are only a few examples of the thousands that plague
the Islamic world.

Closer to home, Bethlehem, when under Israeli control, had a
Christian population in excess of eighty percent. Since Israel handed authority
over to the Palestinians, the Christian population in this significantly
Christian holy town has reduced to less than twenty percent, and a number of
those are priest, nuns, and administrators of their religious shrines.

Professor Justus Reid Weiner of the Jerusalem Center for
Public Affairs has documented the human rights abuses perpetrated against
Christians in Palestinian society. This has led to a fall in numbers down to
less than 1.7% of the general population. Their plight, he writes, is down to
the adoption of Sharia law in the Palestinian Authority Constitution. Moreover,
he says, they feel abandoned by their church leaders who, instead of protecting
them, prefer to curry favor with the Palestinian leadership.

It is the failure of the Christian leadership globally that
is a worrying part of the persecution of their co-religionists.

Just as secular and moderate Muslims have, generally, chosen
to remain silent in the face of the genocidal violence of Islamists, so
prominent world Christian leaders and churches are turning the other cheek to
the slaughter of their fellow men and women.

In South Africa, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and the South
African Council of Churches prefer to side with the religion that is killing
their flock in an unholy alliance against Israel. They have nothing to say
about the Islamic bloody rampage that is creeping out of the Middle East down into
Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, Kenya, and in their direction. They give wholehearted fervent
support for the demonizers and delegitimizers of Israel even as their fellow
Christians are screaming out for their help and salvation from the brutal hands
of these people. But their voices are
silent. They continue to praise the anti-Israel extremists who organize ‘Israel
Apartheid Week’ even as the Arabs perpetrate real apartheid, murder, and
destruction against the people they have been appointed to protect. The shame,
the fraud, and the crime of their mistake is demonstrated by Israel as being
the one country in across the crescent of North Africa and the Middle East in
which the Christian population has grown and prospered. Even in Lebanon the
Christians quake in fear, those who are left, of course.

While Christians were being gunned down, knifed, beheaded,
blown up, live in fear in their thousands throughout the Middle East including
Syria and into Africa, during the Feat of Tabernacles over five thousand
Christians were joyously expressing their love of Israel and Jews as they
paraded proudly and freely in the streets of Jerusalem.

Maybe that is because they know that Israel is the true and
faithful guardian of their holy places in the Holy Land. They also share a
secret with Israel that seems to have been missed by most of their leaders back
home, that both of our faiths are under a clear and present threat from a
religion that has one global ambition – to kill or to subjugate non-Muslims.

We are in a war for our very survival, both Christians and
Jews. To echo the words of Jerusalem
Post Op-Ed editor, Seth Frantzman, Islamism should be made a crime against
humanity (“It’s time to define Islamism as a crime against humanity” Jerusalem
Post, 23 September, 2013), and not appeased. Not only would this protect Jews
and Christians, but it would also safeguard the interests of voiceless Muslims
who do not subscribe to the murderous crusading voice of Islam.

Why am I, an Israeli Jew, be writing this article? Why is it
that Seth Frantzman, another Israeli Jew, the one to propose that Islamism be
outlawed?

Why aren't these words resounding from church pulpits, from
the Vatican, from the parliaments of the Christians and Muslims, from Muslim
lobbying groups, from world bodies?
Well, to begin with, it’s because they are in denial. When was the last
time, if ever, you heard anyone in the Obama Administration refer to this
global slaughter as Islamic terrorism? Never!

As for the weakness of the Christian Church, they need to
find the moral courage to confront this evil that is afflicting their
parishioners.

All have failed to raise the issue and left the world bereft
of any remedy.

The deep heart of this Islamic terror is not deprivation, or
oppression, as liberal progressive academics and politicians would have us believe.
It is all about religious malevolent venom, a dark hatred of the other, a dangerous
ideology to impose a religious creed by coercion, force, violence and terror.

So tell the progressive liberals and think tank ‘experts’ to
stop examining their navels for scabs in our body politic and face the obvious
truth.

Voices have been muzzled by official secular appeasement,
and the charge of “Islamaphobia” against anyone expressing their fear.
If Islamaphobia is the fear of Islam there is genuine cause for that fear.

The first to adopt Frentzman’s Law should be the secular
and moderate Muslims who occasionally tell us that what Islamists are doing is
not the real Islam.

We non-believers are so busy being attacked and
slaughtered in the name of Islam that we cannot accept that argument. We know
who is targeting and killing us, and they are Islamists. So, non-violent
Muslims, the ones without an agenda for our destruction, should be the first to
promote this law to reject terror and the imposition of Sharia law in the name
of their religion on non-compliant societies.

To do so would lead to mutual respect and peaceful
co-existence. Remaining silent proves they are siding with our enemy, simply
biding their time until the moment they decide to join the army of Islam, raise
their sword, and cry ‘Allah Akbar!’

The call for Sharia in the name of Allah should not be a
part of democratic debate. Neither should it be perceived as freedom of speech
or worship in any democratic society. It should be seen as a political and
religious imposition of an ideology as alien as fascism. Like fascism and
anti-Semitism, it should be placed beyond the pale and outlawed as a crime
against humanity and a free society. Muslims in free societies should go about
their life without fear that they are being taught sedition against the society
in which they live. Non-violent Muslims, I am sure, would accept to live within
such a framework in which they are free to practice their religion in peace and
harmony with their non-Muslim neighbors.

This template for harmonious living and mutual respect would
make incidents like 9/11, 7/7, and Westgate Mall unthinkable sins in such a
peaceful environment.

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

U.S. servicemen are being photographed holding signs to hide
their faces. This new form of Anonymous protest is addressed to their President.

“I didn’t join the army to fight for Al-Qaida in Syria.”

They know that Al-Qaida has become a leading force in the
anti-Assad opposition.

In Lebanon, Al-Qaida is poised to overthrow Hezbollah as the
Lebanese turn against the “Party of God” for their intervention in Syria
on behalf of Assad.

In Sinai, Al-Qaida cells are consolidating their hold and
are preparing for future action.

Will we wake up to Israel-v-Al-Qaida in in
close combat in 2014 ?

While the world's attention is on Syria, Al-Qaida prepares to
take over power in Lebanon, on Israel's northern border.

The Abdullah Azzam Brigade launched a rocket attack against
Israel on August 22, 2013. Initially, Israel thought this was yet another
Hezbollah attack. It turned out that this new terror group was responsible. The
Abdullah Azzam Brigade was founded by Saleh bin Abdallah al Qaraawi, a
Saudi-Arabian operative of Al-Qaida. He fought in Iraq, and was badly wounded
by an American missile in Afghanistan. Though no longer a fighter, he is still
stirring up serious interference by forming Al-Qaida cells close to Israel.

The group is named after a Palestinian Arab, Abdullah Yussef
Azzam, who was assassinated in Pakistan in 1989, but whose ideology was adopted
by Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaida. The brigade has a branch in Lebanon located
inside the Palestinian refugee camps, mainly Ein al-Hilweh near Sidon.

The Lebanese branch also goes by the name of Ziyad al-Jarrah
Companies, and its mission is to launch attacks against Israel from its
positions within Lebanon. It recently announced a jihad against UN peacekeeping
forces in Lebanon. Ziyad al-Jarrah may be a familiar name to American
intelligence as he was one of the nineteen terrorists responsible for the September
11 World Trade Center bombing in 2001.

With Hezbollah in disarray in Lebanon, the Abdullah Azzam
Brigade killed a leading Hezbollah leader near the Lebanon-Syria border in
July. A month prior to that, it released a statement condemning Hezbollah for
its involvement in Syria. This Al-Qaida affiliate will become one of the leading
players in Lebanon’s domestic conflict that will surely spill over onto the
Israel side of their border.

On September 1, Egyptian forces arrested Muhammed Ibrahim,
the leader of Al-Qaida in the Sinai Peninsula, in a bloody battle in which he
attemted to explode two hand grenades while resisting arrest.

Egypt had previously arrested Ibrahim for the 2005 attack on
the Egyptian resort town of Sharm al-Sheikh which killed eighty eight people.
Ibrahim managed to escape in a planned major breakout from four Egyptian jails
in March, 2011, which was part of the 2011 revolution against the Mubarak
regime. Many Al-Qaida operatives, including Ibrahim, managed to escape capture
and return to the Sinai. Ibrahim is also accused of planning the Sinai attack
in 2012 which killed 25 Egyptian soldiers.

Lawlessness has increased in the Sinai since the removal from
power of the Muslim Brotherhood President Morsi. Terrorists continue to
infiltrate the Sinai and join up with rival groups with Al-Qaida being the most
prominent.

Israel is happy to have the Egyptian army do battle with
them but it knows that, eventually, Israel will be the prime target for a
consolidated Sinai-based Al-Qaida. There is little doubt that the terror group
is itching to have a go at Israel and an IDF intervention may only be a matter
of time.

Despite efforts on the Iraq-Syria border, hundreds of
Al-Qaida trained terrorists, and trucks filled with heavy and light weapons,
have been flooding into Syria in a repeat of the Libyan scenario. One Iraqi official
said that the ancient towns of Nineveh and Anbar have become “landbridges
for the transportation of weapons and ammunition from Al-Qaida’s huge arsenal
built up over its years of existence in Iraq.”

The funding of the Al-Qaida operations in Syria comes from
Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf state who are increasingly disillusioned with
America’s lack of leadership on Syria.

The Turkish military are training Syrian rebels many of whom
are Al-Qaida operatives. Turkey is also providing heavy weaponry including
anti-tank and anti-aircraft rockets, mortars, and heavy machine-guns.

Western impotence is allowing Al-Qaida to play an
affirmative role in the Syrian opposition to Assad. It is increasingly clear
that any victory over the Assad’s Alawite coalition will be led by Al-Qaida
forces that will not then go silently into the night but will remain in Syria
as a spoiler for other conflicts in the region, the prime target of which will
be Israel just over the border on the Golan Heights.Faced with the mounting evidence of Al-Qaida successes in
the region can anyone deny that Israel will not be forced to confront Al-Qaida
across its borders, or even within Israel, in 2014?

Barry Shaw is the author of ‘Israel Reclaiming the
Narrative.’ www.israelnarrative.com He is also the Special Consultant on
Delegitimization Issues to the Strategic Dialogue Center at Netanya Academic
College.

Thursday, 12 September 2013

The recent 13th World Summit on
Counter-Terrorism, organized by ICT Herzlia, headed by Boaz Ganor, was a
tremendous success.

One of the key factors to the success of this stimulating
event was that it addressed all they key issues in today’s burning and
murderous world.

However, for me, a jarring note was a chance meeting with a
European journalist at one of the conference’s workshops. This reporter has
been based in Israel for two years and her brief was Israel-Palestinian
relations, or lack of them.

Our conversation approached the matter of Palestinian
terrorism at which point she became defensive.

“We don’t call it terrorism. We don’t take sides” was
her knee-jerk response.

I told her that I was one of the co-founders of the Netanya
Terror Victims Organization and asked her what she calls the person who walked
into the Park Hotel in my hometown and blew up over thirty people, mainly
elderly, women, and children, and injured many more. Her answer was that he was
a suicide bomber. I asked if this isn't a terrorist. “No,” she replied, “he
is a fighter.”

By this time the girl was looking for an escape route and
excused herself by telling me she had somewhere to go. Conversation promptly
ended for fear I may convince her otherwise. Some would say she is entitled to
her opinion. But does she?

In the final panel of the conference, which coincidentally
addressed the topic “Defining Terrorism” and to which this journalist
was conspicuous by her absence, I told Boaz Ganor, who chaired the workshop,
that I had encountered a European journalist who was attending his
international conference on counter-terrorism yet is incapable, or unwilling,
to use the term “terrorist” in her articles.

The journalist had told me that she couldn't, or wouldn't,
use that word because she or her journal would not be accused “of taking
sides,” but the mere fact that, for her, a terrorist has morphed into a “fighter”
even when targeting civilians displays a clear case of taking sides. The
use of the word “fighter” goes some way in justifying the motive behind
killing innocent civilians. More grotesquely, it equalizes the perpetrator and
the victims. Such is the perverted
morality of European journalists, and many of their politicians.

Boaz Ganor has a theory for the definition of terrorism. It
is based on the deliberate targeting of civilians for murder for political,
religious, or cultural aims. Ganor differentiates between this and attacks
against military targets which, by his definition, does not constitute an act
of terror.

This theory was met with a robust rejection from Colonel
Richard Kemp, who led British forces in Afghanistan and is a counter-terrorism
advisor to the British Government. In his opinion, the beheading of Lee Rigby,
an off-duty soldier, dressed in civilian clothes, on the streets of Woolwich,
London, by two Islamists on 22 May, 2013, can only be described as an act of
terror.

Boaz Ganor professed that if Hamas were to officially declare
that they will continue to hate Israel, work for its destruction, continue to
target and kill Israeli military personnel, but will renounce and refrain from
targeting civilians, that he would be the first to say that they are no longer
a terrorist organization.

“This,” he said, “would constitute a victory for
counter-terrorism.”

He may have a point but until that day comes the murder of
Israeli civilians by Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, or Al-Qaida continue to unquestionably
be acts of terror.

The international communities’ inability to come up with a
clear or adequate definition of terror is preventing the victims of terror from
having the justice that comes with having their day in court. They cannot successfully bring a case of
terrorism against perpetrators in a legal environment that has no guidance or
clarity in defining what terrorism is.
The failure to properly define terrorism hampers the extradition of
perpetrators for trial and judgment.

A definition that has international recognition is
urgently needed for the sake of justice for the

victims of terror, and for the morality and defense of
nations in which terror is perpetrated.

Barry Shaw is the Special Consultant on Delegitimization
Issues to the Strategic Dialogue Center at Netanya Academic College.

When an enemy uses mass destruction on its own people, and
also threatens other states, there
should be no dilemma between security and morality.

We saw that with Hitler. We saw it with Saddam Hussein. We
see it in Syria. We see it with Iran as they race to the ultimate weapon of
mass destruction.

In all cases, the free world failed to recognize and name
the perpetrators as their enemy until much too late.

In all cases, the free world chose to appease and delay
action until conditions became infinitely worse for them to respond.

As Hitler’s troops were massacring Jews and marching into
Poland, America said, “It’s not our fight.”

In 1940, after Nazi Germany was already occupying Poland and
Czechoslovakia, presidential candidate Roosevelt said, “I will not allow our
boys to fight in a foreign war,” and got himself elected with this slogan.
It was only in 1941, after Japan attacked US ships in Pearl Harbor, which Roosevelt
described as “an act of infamy” did American wake up to the moral cause of
World War 2. By that time Germany had reached Moscow and the French coast.

The use of chemical weapons by Saddam Hussein against the
Kurds in Halabje did nothing to encourage America and its allies to step in on
the basis of morality and a serious breach of international law for the use of
chemical weapons on civilians. He had to march into Kuwait and threaten
American interests in Saudi Arabia before President Bush One rushed his forces
to stop him. Morality and humanitarian causes be damned it seems when others
are being slaughtered with mass destruction.

One can assume that the West will only act against Syria, or
even Iran, after America itself has been targeted for death and destruction,
and not before if history is anything to go by.

Deterrence, it seems, is no longer a factor or strategic
option for the West.

This clearly applies to Iran. We will see the West become hypnotized
by the upcoming charm offensive from the new Iranian leadership. With an
adopted strategic policy of appeasement and wishful thinking, the West will be
seduced by nice words and empty promises, rather than hold Iran’s feet to the
fire.

Rouhani’s centrifuges keep spinning as he smiles his way to
the bomb.

Barry Shaw is the Special Consultant on Delegitimization
Issues to The Strategic Dialogue Center at Netanya Academic College.