streaming music... will be a wasted effort. SJ was right not to bend to subscription music years ago.
If i want random, mixed, new and old music, I simply turn on my "radio" , a novel idea that has been around for a looong time. and i get some human chat/opinion and news thrown in with it. And its doesnt cost a monthly subscription.
just put in an FM chip, built your own tuner app and have a button to "buy" the current playing song, using a shazam like background process...

Amazing... by trying to question what Rabbit_Coach was saying, as though he is doing it wrong, you basically wrote a description stating that you do EXACTLY what he is doing!!! Wonderous ! Anyway, on the article, what a great idea. Stunned that its not been done yet, it so simple and obvious (once you are told it) Very Apple. Didnt know i wanted it until they showed it to me. The screen is the biggest draw of power on pretty any mobile device, so this is big.

$1400 ??? Insane
Considering how much glasses get left behind, its an expensive mistake.
But what about the fact that peoples phones get nicked from their hands all the time in broad daylight.
How many people will have someone run up behind them, grab the glasses and leg it? At that value, its a great incentive for theives.
I love new tech and think this is a great step forward, but its got too many problems, many stated here already
1. What...

seriously.... is there any surprise here?
or maybe people post comments here have zero experience in the runnings of a normal company?
if i was a board member of a company and *wasn't* informed about developing products, i'd be pretty nervous/annoyed/suspicious
It's the board's duty to give input and know what the company is doing, especially at something the size of Apple.
Why do people think that products are developed in the weeks before its...

yawn. Another ANALyist who just doesnt get it. Thats not the Apple way.
To me it looks like Apple are doing just fine with the Lions share of all the profits in the market at the moment.
These guys just seem to value based on Market share % alone.
Let Samsung be the "busy fools". Dozens of models, no OS of their own, no eco-system, drastically fragmented OS versions, small margins.
Looks to me like Samsung (and others) are the ones who need to find an answer to Apple's...

"Ironically, a nearly identical vulnerability reared its ugly head back in October of 2010 "
Coincidentally, maybe, but Ironically???
Cant see the irony here....
Love it when guys find these little bug things out... I always have to think... what made him do those actions in exactly that order to discover the bug? Do these people sit all day just trying random combinations of actions or is there a "method".

"Who is/are Retuers?
Never heard of 'em.
oh. Maybe they mean Reuters?
Great journalism. This really give a lot of confidence in what was written in the article."
hahaha, I see what you did there... you caught a typo !!! hahaha brilliant, You really PWNED them! Amazing ! oh god, i LOL'd for hours.
i'll bet you never made a typo ! Ace!

my brother bought 3 android tablet for the kids at christmas (decision price based). 2 are now goosed, very, very sub standard charging connections have given up only 2 months later. kids plugging them in and out 10 times a day will always end up with bent pins etc. And they had to plugged in so often as the battery life was dreadful.
In relation to the story, the kids only us the tablets for games apps ( when they actually work, loads will install and not run) and a...

2 issues i have with this story
1. why is it "breaking" when its only a rehash of previous rumour articles
2. it says "Apple ... TO FEATURE ...."
Who confirmed that??? Surely it should read "may feature"?
mislead much?
ANALysts!!