I buy and play cod, not every year, but often enough. A high metacritic score and being near the top of game charts doesn't necessarily inform whether a game has problems.

Reviews do though. Scores are just an average. Titan fall isn't perfect but far from having big problems. If the game is getting better than average reviews from most gaming sites, then it can't have that many problems. Not having enough content isn't necessarily a problem with the game. It was designed that way.

Reviews do though. Scores are just an average. Titan fall isn't perfect but far from having big problems. If the game is getting better than average reviews from most gaming sites, then it can't have that many problems. Not having enough content isn't necessarily a problem with the game. It was designed that way.

Reviews do though. Scores are just an average. Titan fall isn't perfect but far from having big problems. If the game is getting better than average reviews from most gaming sites, then it can't have that many problems. Not having enough content isn't necessarily a problem with the game. It was designed that way.

also, having "above average" reviews doesn't mean that the game may have big issues.

hell, it doesn't matter, it has average reviews either due to a few big problems or several little problems. whichever way you wanna slice it lol, it has problems or it would get a lot better than "better than average" ratings.

Playing devil's advocate, that's a logical fallacy you just employed. You're acting as though the small amount is "not enough" factually.

I was all over a bunch of genres I don't really play when I first got my PS3, because I wanted to bulk up my catalogue, and because I got games my friends would play with me online. I have no desire to follow my friends' purchases to get games that don't really interest me, especially when we don't seem to play at the same times, so I would ignore this one if it did come to the PS4. Doesn't interest me.

Playing devil's advocate, that's a logical fallacy you just employed. You're acting as though the small amount is "not enough" factually.

right except you have to draw the line somewhere. otherwise you are asking developers to charge $60 for pacman and tetris. because guess what, those can be and have been played for thousands of hours by some people.

Enough content for what? We knew they would be supporting the game with more updates after launch. Yes, they design the game to stay fresh by releasing more content updates. It's a way to make more money, but a lot of devs do that. You seemed to enjoy the game. Did you not?

Enough content for what? We knew they would be supporting the game with more updates after launch. Yes, they design the game to stay fresh by releasing more content updates. It's a way to make more money, but a lot of devs do that. You seemed to enjoy the game. Did you not?

You clearly said it was designed to not have enough content. Read your post again. lol

Playing devil's advocate, that's a logical fallacy you just employed. You're acting as though the small amount is "not enough" factually. I was all over a bunch of genres I don't really play when I first got my PS3, because I wanted to bulk up my catalogue, and because I got games my friends would play with me online. I have no desire to follow my friends' purchases to get games that don't really interest me, especially when we don't seem to play at the same times, so I would ignore this one if it did come to the PS4. Doesn't interest me.

Well I have actually played it and I am among those who thought the small amount wasnt enough. Certainly not enough to warrant the 60 dollar price tag. Have you even played it? If you haven't then how would you even know whats "factual" or not regarding the amount of content?

You clearly said it was designed to not have enough content. Read your post again. lol

Yea, it was designed to be continuously supported with mechs, weapons, maps, and any other additions they will add is what i meant. That was always their strategy for the game. Not enough content is subjective.

Yea, it was designed to be continuously supported with mechs, weapons, maps, and any other additions they will add is what i meant. That was always their strategy for the game. Not enough content is subjective.

Well yea, if one is then so is the other. The game is just the way the devs intended it to be. They released it and will continue o support it with additional content. Obviously the game is doing well and these so called problems haven't hurt it ability to be successful.

Well yea, if one is then so is the other. The game is just the way the devs intended it to be. They released it and will continue o support it with additional content. Obviously the game is doing well and these so called problems haven't hurt it ability to be successful.

Yeah both are subjective. Never said they werent. So it sounds like we're more in agreement than we both thought then. As for the problems I didnt really encounter anything more than some bad slowdown during one round for a brief time and one time the servers were down for awhile for people in certain areas and regions. I personally wasnt affected. It just took a little longer for the game to put some teams together. Other than that it was fine.

Enough content for what? We knew they would be supporting the game with more updates after launch. Yes, they design the game to stay fresh by releasing more content updates. It's a way to make more money, but a lot of devs do that. You seemed to enjoy the game. Did you not?

Enough content for what? We knew they would be supporting the game with more updates after launch. Yes, they design the game to stay fresh by releasing more content updates. It's a way to make more money, but a lot of devs do that. You seemed to enjoy the game. Did you not?

I missed the last part of your post so I'll address that now. Yeah like I've already said dozens of times before its a fun game and I enjoyed it. But I only rented it (like I've also told you several times) because I didnt feel it was worth the full 60 bucks given the light amount of content.

Yeah both are subjective. Never said they werent. So it sounds like we're more in agreement than we both thought then. As for the problems I didnt really encounter anything more than some bad slowdown during one round for a brief time and one time the servers were down for awhile for people in certain areas and regions. I personally wasnt affected. It just took a little longer for the game to put some teams together. Other than that it was fine.

Yea, you said it was amazing and fun as hell. I never got the impression from you that content was an issue.

Yea, you said it was amazing and fun as hell. I never got the impression from you that content was an issue.

It is amazing and fun as hell. But the content was light which is why I rented it. I was waiting for it to hit 40 bucks then I was going to buy it. My enjoyment of it doesn't change the fact that I felt it was light on content. In fact that was my only gripe about the game. No need for you to be so butthurt about it. Lmao!

Posting Permissions

PlayStation Universe

Copyright 2006-2014 7578768 Canada Inc. All Right Reserved.

Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written
permission of Abstract Holdings International Ltd. prohibited.Use of this site is governed
by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.