SCAMMING – Palazzo​ ​Lancia,​ ​Turin

The exhibition ​Scamming​, taking place at the Palazzo Lancia in Turin, unfolds the nature of contemporary myths and imagines their possible contaminations and détournements through subversive acts of theft and strategic scamming. ​Scamming proposes deception and fraud as productive artistic tools that have the possibility to appropriate the languages and materials of the taught, and to work, forge, twist, and destabilize​ ​them​ ​and​ ​to​ ​uncover​ ​what​ ​hovers​ ​underneath.

The works gathered here do this in dialogue with the everyday myths inscribed in the chosen stage-forming environment: the Palazzo Lancia, an architectural landmark of Turin, and a powerful historic symbol for its inhabitants that has shaped the collective imaginary. The late modernist skyscraper, commissioned in 1953 by Gianni Lancia and designed by the architects Nino Rosani and Giò Ponti, was to serve as the new administrative headquarters for the automobile manufacturer Lancia. While similar to the Pirelli Tower in Milan, it stood out as the first of its kind in Turin. The Palazzo’s completion in 1956 coincided with the “miracolo economico,” the explosive Italian postwar economic boom of the fifties and sixties.

However, by 1969, Lancia was suffering severe financial setbacks, and rival Turinese automobile manufacturer FIAT made a bid to take over the building. FIAT would occupy the Palazzo for the next three decades, coinciding hard-left activism and the beginning of seeming post-ideological politics and the rise of the neoliberalism and global financialization that must be read in relation to recurring nationalism. At the end of the nineties, FIAT vacated the building, opening it up for investors. Since then, there has been a succession of failed attempts to transform the structure into new, elitist, and exclusive forms, in an effort​ ​to​ ​attract​ ​prestigious​ ​companies​ ​or​ ​luxury​ ​condominiums.

Emitting the same Kafkaesque aura as the inaccessible ​Castle​, the Palazzo today has not lost the link to its identity-sustaining myth of not only Italian but European and “Western” growth, but still, the surfaces of both the building and of the belief in European liberalism have witnessed cracks and erosions. The scope of sociopolitical, economic, and cultural narratives articulated and the material languages present in Scamming exceed the specific context of the Palazzo Lancia. Yet, they are nonetheless deeply anchored in​ ​a​ ​mutual​ ​material​ ​and​ ​ideological​ ​reality​ ​of​ ​value​ ​systems​ ​that​ ​are​ ​attempted​ ​to​ ​be​ ​made​ ​unstable.

Roland Barthes’ “Myth Today” was published one year after the Palazzo’s completion and underpins the cartography of ​Scamming​. Seen in the light of the oft-conflicting individual and collective identity formations, the myth after Barthes is a metalinguistic system of signs, which deforms and empties out the formation of meaning through (1) “expression” and (2) “content” and articulates something additional and ideologically motivated. This “extra” of the sign is inscribed in the material reality of the everyday, trivial and unnoticed. Something that is not easily caught by sight, it spreads and takes on different shapes, colors,​ ​and​ ​materials​ ​to​ ​naturalize​ ​and​ ​disguise​ ​itself​ ​in​ ​repetition.

The space where the exhibition takes place reveals layers of skins, each one evidence of a different attempt in the Palazzo’s history to renovate, renew, and repair. These attempts are constantly exposed: one may see them by the difference in the floor, which mutates from raw concrete to linoleum to tile, or in the several layers of paint present on the walls. Such are the works of the artists collected in this exhibition, whose multilayered practices intertwine elements of the political, the economic, and cultural languages and materials with the autobiographical, the emotional, and the intimate sphere of identity definition and imagination, and create a speculative construct of an individual view of the world and its structures. Mythologies are identity-defining, and vice versa: the construction of individual identity generates​ ​new​ ​a​ ​myth.