RE: Ruh-roh

The insanity continues. The problem starts with how vague the definition of collusion and obstruction of justice is. Most objective folks would allow a president to comment on a case that impacts him and go about his job and would feel like justice actually did proceed even if awkwardly. They can only conclude they can’t see a crime, they will not conclude that there is no possibility of a crime – as is the case in any investigation. If the outcome does not satisfy do we next expect to investigate whether Mueller could be a Russian agent?

I get it. Schiff and others hate Trump. I agree his behavior and personality is bad and you may disagree with his position on issues. But he is also not the last president we will have. He will not be the last some disagree with or the last some hate to hear talk. What we are defining are the limits for others when we get a president we support in the near future. If the big activity for a 4 year term is simply defending a partisan acquisition and little else gets discussed, do you really think that will never be used by the opposition again? Is it time to give up on discussing the issues?

We need to be doing what we expect others to do when we finally have a great president. I am hoping that they will stick to debating issues. Keep in mind, most often the other party controls either the Senate or the House. Please don’t expect no one else to be good at this game. Imagine this game with the economy in a serious multiyear decline. Instead, how about a good opponent to Trump.

DISCLAIMER:
UteFans.Net is not affiliated with the University of
Utah, except that the owner, operators and contributing members
are students, alumni,
and rabid fans of the U. Additionally,
the owner and operators of Utefans.Net are not responsible
for the actions of those who use this public forum. By contributing
to this
forum you agree to abide by the Rules of Conduct outlined on
the
Post Message page.