No, absolutely not - she walked in, saw the scene, was propositioned and walked out. She swears Jackson was having sex with her and that the complainant did not seem to be distressed. It is impossible to conclude definitively anything from that.

Ok she swears they were having sex not rape.

I hope the jury come to the right decision based on all the facts presented to them and not what we have to go on. If it’s a guilty version then i hope they all get the what they deserve

You've just repeated the same mistake. She said the complainant did not seem distressed. She was asked, almost two years later, if this was still her recollection, and said yes, 100%.

That is her saying "yes, my recollection is 100% that she did not seem distressed" i.e. she does not recall it any differently now to how she did at the time. That is NOT the same as her saying "she was 100% not distressed."

See the difference?

Based on what she said then, you think she seen a rape?

What sort of question is that and how can I possibly answer it?

She saw a girl who did not appear, to her, to be in distress. It is impossible to draw a conclusion from that alone as to whether or not they raped her ffs

What "I think" off her evidence is that Jackson had penetrative sex with her and she was not visibly distressed or crying out for help. Again, it is impossible to conclude whether or not a rape occurred from that alone.

Do you think if you walked into that situation and seen what she saw based on her testimony, that you would be able to decide if it was rape or a threesome like she described?

You've just repeated the same mistake. She said the complainant did not seem distressed. She was asked, almost two years later, if this was still her recollection, and said yes, 100%.

That is her saying "yes, my recollection is 100% that she did not seem distressed" i.e. she does not recall it any differently now to how she did at the time. That is NOT the same as her saying "she was 100% not distressed."

Is it the done thing in Belfast to hang around and have a gawk when you open the door and see/hear people getting it on? On the rare occasion I entered such a room, I doubt I ever got as far as fully opening the door before closing it again

Is the suggestion not that she opened the door, got shocked, closed the door? Don't think there's been any mention of a prolonged gawk.

About a minute or under? Now if I opened the door for 30 seconds that’s still long