Share On:

sniffer wrote:Watched the game back and following the kick on Ederson I timed it as approximately 11 minutes before those mutants Tyler and Neville had the decency to actually say they hoped he was going to be OK and not suffered a serious injury. All they could talk about was how the red card should not have been. Sky and their commentators/pundits are a disgrace. All rags and dippers.

sniffer wrote:Watched the game back and following the kick on Ederson I timed it as approximately 11 minutes before those mutants Tyler and Neville had the decency to actually say they hoped he was going to be OK and not suffered a serious injury. All they could talk about was how the red card should not have been. Sky and their commentators/pundits are a disgrace. All rags and dippers.

This is quite shocking 11 minutes Fucking Wankers .

Gary Chuckle Neville, for all the praise this rag twat get for his punditry, he confirmed what a rag slanted twat he is is. His bile was at best laughable, at worst a disgrace. His hate for us was so evident he did not give a flying toss for Ederson. As for Tyler, pathetic yes Gary no Gary 2 hours of snipes no praise just spiteful comment, every time I hear him I think at least this twat had to comment on Agueroooooo that Martin is payback you rag loving cunt. BrandPL for the few and fuck the rest. City 5 - BrandPLiverpool 0 Burried by a red card

Listening to whinging dippers takes their cues from the media is just like listening to trump surrogates parrot his insane line of reasoning and lies as if it's normal fact.

Let's follow the latest line of reasoning about this:

1. Mane had to go for the ball, that's a striker's job. 2. He had his eyes on the ball.3. You can't fault him for not knowing where the keeper is. 4. If the other player's face ends up in stitches, that shouldn't determine the punishment. 5. Another challenge happened the next day that went unpunished so this one should be rescinded.

1. You don't have to go for the ball, and probably shouldn't if there is huge chance that you'll be sent off. Your team could use 11 players for 60 mins more than a goal. If he did really want to go for it, use your head line any other arial challenge - not studs up 6 feet off the ground.

2. The worst excuse on here. Ratboy should be sacked for pushing this defense. Let's see what happens next time a City player is looking at the ball but tackles someone in the leg.

3. You can fault him. It's a fundamental part of the job to know where other players are. How the fuck else would you play the game.

4. Not necessarily, but it's a massive strawman. He karate kicked Ederson with his studs in the fucking face at close to full speed. Surely, the resulting injury tells you that he made contact and deserves a ban.

Russian propagandists would be proud of the media dippers efforts over the last few days. If you give yourself a lobotomy after a week long bender, their arguments might start to make a tiny bit of sense.

Just imagine if it was Super Mario instead of Mane. He would be banned for 10 games at least and more likely 1/2 a season. And I'm not exaggerating at all.

Just watched CNN Champs League Review & PreviewEvery British team namechecked and discussed except (of course) usThe words 'Manchester City' never made it out of the yank's mouth in a ten minute report.

The whole thing from Klipperty to Neville to Tyler sky BBC just smacks of Fergiscum days when anything was used to deflect from a shite performance .But as it was City they all want to deflect away from a great performance . Wankers one and all

I called I the pub after work and they had a selection of dailies. The only one left was the Sun, which I made the mistake of looking at. I found this gem:

' MAROUANE FELLAINI was the hero as Manchester United began their quest tomark a special anniversary in the best possible way. Next May will be 50 year since the club’s emotional first European Cup triumph. If they can lift the trophy a fourth time this season it will proof that fate truly does have hand in things.'