Saturday, April 2

NCR land case victory is another evidence

KUCHING:Native landowners’ fight through the Court against the state BN government’s land-grabbing policy is yet another victory when Kuching High Court on 29 March 2011 agreed with the plaintiffs that they have their customary rights over Bukit Bediri Forest Reserve and the SitkaForest in Sebangan.

“The victory against the state BN government is yet another evidence of state government’s land-grabbing policy,” said Baru Bian, Chairman of Sarawak PKR, when he commented on the court case.

“Remember, we have been releasing evidence of land-grabbing by the state government. This is the fourth such evidence, and we will release more as we are approaching the polling day,” he said, adding that the government continues to deny that it is grabbing land from the natives.

“But we have proofs that the government is taking away people’s land and giving such land to their own cronies,” he told the Press.

Mujah, Lai and Pili have on behalf of themselves and natives of the three villages have sued Hock Tong Hin Sawmill Co. Bhd, of Market Street, Sibu and Roundtrees Timber Sdn Bhd, of Kampung Nyabor Road, Sibu for encroaching into their NCR land.

The director of forests, Sarawak, the superintendent of lands and surveys, Samarahan Division and the state government of Sarawak were also named as defendants.

The plaintiffs said their land consists of their NCR land or territorial domain locally referred to as ‘Pemakai Menua’ or ‘Pulau Galau’ and ‘temuda’ created before 1 January 1958, which was eventually gazetted by the state government as a communal forest for seven kampungs or villages namely Kampung Entanggor, Kampung Ensika, Kampung Stika, Kampung Sekitong, Kampung Sungai Lumut, Kampung Sungai Arus and Kampung Tungkah Dayak.

On or about January 2006, the natives discovered that the Hock Tong Hin Sawmill and Roundtree Timber Sdn Bhd and their employers and workers had been found to have been trespassing the said land by building a railway track to carry out logging activities over a part of the land causing serious damages to its environments, losing of timber and polluting its river systems.

Some time in February 2006 a complaint was lodged with the District Officer, Simunjan on the encroachment of a logging activity within the said land but the officer advised the plaintiffs to make a report with Sarawak Forestry Corporation.

Thereafter a report was made at the later office at Hock Lee Centre, Kuching, but no action was taken, and when a meeting between the landowners and the representatives of the two companies failed, a blockade was erected at Bukit Bediri on September 14, 2006 to stop the felling and extracting of timber by the two companies and to stop them from causing more damages to the said land or forest and its environment.

As the result of the felling and extraction of timber, the rights to livelihood of the natives have been and continue to be seriously impaired by the acts and the provision of the law.

In their statement of claim, the natives further aver that the impairing of their rights to livelihood by the acts and the provisions of the law is unjust, unfair and unreasonable, destructive of their economic, cultural and social system for their existence and therefore not in accordance with the law.

The natives also further claim that they have been deprived of their sources of food, fish, medicine, wildlife and other forest produce which they need and are dependent upon for their daily sustenance. They have also been deprived of their sources of income from their land, fruit trees and other essential trees and crops.

In her ruling, the judge declared that the natives have the customary rights over the said land at Bukit Bediri Forest Reserve and the StikaForest.

She said the construction of the rail line across these two forests constitutes an encroachment and a trespass of the land.

“The defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay damages to be assessed by the Deputy Registrar, to the plaintiffs (except those from Kampung Stika) for the said trespass,” the judge ordered.

Commenting on their victory, Mujah said that the case should be a good lesson to the people especially Tuai Rumah and Penghulu that they cannot sell their customary rights over land without the consensus of the people.

“Look at the people from Kampung Stika who sold their rights ranging from RM30.00 per family to RM200 per family to the companies,” he said.

“Although the people of Stika also share the joy of victory with us, nevertheless they do not receive any compensation whatsoever from the damaged land, the destruction of their fruit trees and crops.

“This is clearly stated by the judge,” Mujah added, pointing out that this is the lesson that all longhouse chiefs and the natives must remember.

To Mr. Baru Bian. Keep up your professionalism in your legal practise and apply the same in politics. Do not be unduly influenced by the emotions of your followers. 15 seats for DAP, 5 for PAS is well and fine. Accept the humble request by SNAP to contest the (say 23) dayaks majority seats and the balance of 28 seats are yours (and PKR) to wrestle.

I am definitely convinced and thousands of other Dayaks and fellow Sarawakians should be convinced beyond any reasonable doubts by now that SNAP no longer subscribes to the struggle of the Pakatan Rakyat to seek justice for NCR landowners and to fight the highly corrupted regime of Taib Mahmud.

On behalf of all Sarawakians who are ready to vote for Change, I urge Baru Bian and the leaders of Pakatan Rakyat to officially and publicly announce that SNAP is no longer a partner in Pakatan Rakyat Sarawak and that SNAP is with UMNO controlled BN in this election.

Inform all rural voters with immediate effect that SNAP is fighting this election for UMNO controlled BN. Sarawakians voting for change must reject any parties outside of Pakatan Rakyat. We must not be fooled by SNAP and must reject them outright.

I am one of the thousands of dayak from Sarawak working in the Oil and Gas Industry. Our group (working around the middle east)are donors to the SNAP Election fund. I know of many other dayak and Malaysian of all races working offshore in other parts of the world ( Africa, Russia, North Sea and many other locations)who are also donors to the fund.

It is insulting and not correct for those who are anti SNAP to potray and accuse the party to have received money from BN to split the opposition votes in the coming election.We are sad because some so called dayak intellectuals were involved in the smear campaign.

For those of you who wish to know the real truth about PKR please read the statement by Dominique Ng (The Borneo Post dd 2-4-2011 - front page) where names of some PKR leader (Baharuddin and Baru Bian) and their roles and association (with) being mentioned.

I take this opportunity to remind readers that it is good for you to read Sarawak National Party.Org for their side of the story.

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed

Followers

Subscribe To

Quote of the day

The Broken Shield was launched on 16 Dec 2007

To order, please email to tawiejoseph@gmail.com

DISCLAIMER:

Dear readers, all commments are welcome but will be MODERATED. Please take note that comments that are too derogatory, too racialist in nature and too personal will be disallowed. Comments/views expressed are not those of the blog owner. Thank you.