Загружено:

Описание:

Trevor McTaggart, Hibbert Hodges' Glen Hodges, and Mathew Stirling 'lost' again before Justice Randall. After braying how they snatched victory, Judge Randall advised Hodges and Stirling to call their insurance company and get off the case. Will Gatto Corpoate Solutions be hired by the other side to get the Costs?

Загружено:

Описание:

Trevor McTaggart, Hibbert Hodges' Glen Hodges, and Mathew Stirling 'lost' again before Justice Randall. After braying how they snatched victory, Judge Randall advised Hodges and Stirling to call their insurance company and get off the case. Will Gatto Corpoate Solutions be hired by the other side to get the Costs?

We refer to the above matter and your correspondence of 10 October 2014.

In response to your specific questions, we offer the following:

Your question 1(a)We make no apologies for defending the position of an octogenarian who has been rippedoff by Glenn Jones once and he was coming back for a second go. At no time were threatsmade and to say that Mr Jones felt threatened physically is ridiculous. The Court upheld ourposition and in our view supported our stance. Sometimes in order to catch a rat, one mustenter the drain and get down and dirty. The Lawyer originally in this case has been removed(or we suspect has removed himself due to a conflict of interest); the Accountant whofalsified financial statements and tax Returns has removed himself and the aggressor (GlennJones) has been rebuffed by the Court and we look forward to November 10 when the Courtreconvenes to deal with him properly.Your question 1(b)We are qualified to carry out a forensic investigation. We have a Chartered Accountant, anAccountant with a Masters in Accounting and an Accountant specializing in investigativework.In terms of a Litigation Funder; what qualifications does one need? We can apply our moneyas we see fit. What better cause than a bully ripping off an 80 year old plus lady? We will dothis any and every day.We have never briefed Queens Counsel. This is a ridiculous accusation.Your question 1(c)We have never spoken to the Real Estate Agent involved and we have no knowledge of thistransaction. The letter to King & Heath (Real Estate Agents) is signed by Rod Wallace. Wehave never advised M r Wallace in regard to conversing with King & Heath.Your question 2This matter is before the Courts with a Return Date of 4 November 2014. We are not surewhat we can and cannot provide you on this basis. What we can say however is that GlennJones is using you as a dispute resolution center. There is no basis to his claims.

Now to the letter of complaint by Jones:

• Our instructions are that Jones was contracted by Wallace to assist in a dispute in regard to work done and money owed to Wallace. Jones convinced Wallace to hand over control of his Bank Accounts to Jones. Jones operated these accounts to his advantage and misappropriated money. The current dispute between the 2 relates to this manipulation and misappropriation. • The IPA is being used by Jones as a Dispute resolution Centre. • Any correspondence coming from Mr McTaggart or Arbitrans'was directed to a crooked Lawyer, an Accountant who provided false and misleading financials and Glenn Jones who had already ripped off an Octogenarian to the value of $600,000. We make no excuses for our tone. We are dealing with thieves. • McTaggart never called Jones a 'fat pig'. However we thank him for 'coming out'. • Lewis Janover was retained by Mr Jones to engage in litigation with Mr Wallace. Janover personally served legal documents on Wallace. To describe Janover as a conveyancing lawyer is a lie. • We did carry out a forensic investigation which is now complete. We found Jones guilty of fraud, the Accountant guilty of producing false financial statements and Tax returns and Janover acting when he had a clear conflict of interest. McTaggart has been vindicated with the Lawyer ceasing to act for Jones; the Accountant withdrawing from this action; all before the Court completes its hearing of the case. They are 'on the run'. • We and McTaggart have never contacted Estate Agents or had any influence over same. Jones refers to a letter to King and Heath written by Wallace. We have never seen this letter. Jones is delusional and confused. Actions of a desperate man who is being found out! • We maintain our position in regard to the Lawyer and the Accountant acting illegally and we say Jones was at the centre of this. We have no knowledge of previous Court cases. We limit ourselves to the current dispute and form our opinions based on our research here. • There is no doubt that the Lawyer, the Accountant and Jones are involved in a criminal conspiracy. The Court has found this to be true and we can't wait for the November hearing where the Court will rule. It is our hope that Jones goes to gaol. • Mr McTaggart's correspondence achieved what was required. Jones hoped to trick an octogenarian into vacating her property so Jones could sell the property and steal more money.

We were amazed when Simon Woodford rejected our Ethical Letter email approach on the basisthat he was owed money for preparing accounts for Wallace and Refurb Solutions Pty Ltd. He hadalready levied charges well beyond recommended professional costs and was clearly trying to blockour investigation. We ask that you look at this with a view to determining the truth and accuracy ofthe accounts he produced.

Mr Jones has produced a number of letters and sent other correspondence to a number ofinstitutions complaining about Mr McTaggart and his conduct in this matter. He need not havebothered. We and McTaggart no longer act for Wallace. Our job is complete and we have been paidfor our services.

What we did was act on our clients instructions. Nothing more and nothing less. We stopped anobvious injustice and protected the rights of an elderly women who had clearly been compromised.We provided correct and accurate accounts for our client and our job is done.Our instructions now are to leave the matter to the Courts to decide. We have no role in the matterongoing. Of course we would like to see Mr Jones bought to account like any other thief but that isas far as it goes.

We trust this clarifies the situation and exposes the claimant and his tactics.