Dystopia on the Horizon

From the recent gory events in
the USA, it would seem to the average punter, America is finally if not belatedlyunravelling at the seams.
Homicidal psychotic cops shooting down brown citizens irrespective how high
their hands are thrust towards the sky. The school massacres, the live broadcast of revenge murders, the slaughter of clergy, (not necessarily a bad
thing), all of which is apparently
leading up to a contrived bloody race
war. Over-shadowing these endless spectacles of violence is the growing fear,
the ultimate goal of government is to disarm the entire nation. The Internet is buzzing with thousands of conspiracy theories claiming this gruesome litany of ‘postal’ episodes is
little more than false-flags staged by a despotic government determined to
completely disarm the citizenry in order to enslave absolutely the
citizenry. Video platforms such as YouTube and Facebook host hundreds of false-flag topic videos dissecting the
latest ‘tragedy’ frame by frame, warning viewers total gun prohibition is a goose-step
closer with each false-flag bloodbath.
Thus the cyber-world consensus is that none of the recent massacres,
from the Sandy Hook slaughter, the Boston Marathon bombing through to the Charleston clergy bloodbath actually
took place. These crimes were each staged by a tyrannical establishment bent on
stripping the nation of its constitutional right to bear arms. Once the entire
US civilian population is rendered defenceless then the clandestine FEMA camps will come
into operation, and total domination will ensue.

Officer Slager (left) having just shot an African-American in the back, killing him. The only reason why Slager was arrested was due to a citizen secretly filming the psychopath.

I must admit the agenda to
confiscate guns to prepare 250 million people for Orwellian enslavement
appealed to me. After-all at first glance it made sense. Deeply traumatise the
nation with repeated incidents of blood-spattered carnage and soon enough even
gun-toting confederate ‘Rednecks’, dressed in their tattiest John Deere caps,
will line up to surrender their weapons. Then it struck me like a blow to the
back of the head from the butt of a Glock 40 handgun. Americans are already
enslaved! Americans are already oppressed! In fact the ruling elites could not want for a more subjugated, docile, compliant, and indoctrinated herd of
mammals. Americans, as the ‘developing world’
so sorely appreciates, will slavishly invade and vandalise any nation at the
snap of a congressman’s petite manicured fingers. Vietnam, Laos, most of South
America at one time or another, Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan have each been victimised, or in US
vernacular ‘liberated’ by that most enslaved nation of ‘patriots’. The entire
population of the USA is literally at the disposal of the tyrants in charge who
can annihilate any [weaker] nation on earth by simply corralling the
‘freedom-loving’ herd towards the borders of the latest designated ‘enemy of
freedom’.

Who is the slave patriot?

Americans personify the perfect
‘slave consumer’ measuring the quality of their lives by the merchandise they accumulate over their lifespans. These eternal ‘debt-slaves’ are the
fattest on the planet. Perhaps most fortuitously of all, for any bona-fide
dictatorship, Americans remain mesmerised by their television sets absorbing
most of their ‘knowledge’ and ‘wisdom’ through the living-room portal. The most popular TV programs ingested by
Americans continue to be dramas glorifying and lionising the more oppressive
columns of the Establishment – the police, the military and judiciary. This has been a
fixed trend in viewership for half of century. Again, a despot couldn't wish
for a tamer herd of obedient patriots who actually find pride and glory in
sending their sons to dirt-poor Afghanistan villages to hunt and kill peasants, who are so materially bereft, they have never seen a television.

Farting room only - the fastest growing industry in the US are jails.

America hosts the largest prison
population on the planet, more so than China, a nation of 1 billion souls. An estimated 8 million Americans, including debtors, are harnessed in
some form of penal bondage, 4 million of whom are warehoused in dystopian,
almost subterranean prisons. US Senator, Cory Booker, observed "We built a new prison every 10 days between 1990 and 2005 to keep up with our mass incarceration explosion of nonviolent offenders". Booker's extraordinary claim was fact-checked and corroborated by independent researchers.Only in the
USA can a citizen forfeit his entire life for smoking a weed that grows in the
dirt or worse still, stealing a candy bar from the local Wal-Mart. This unprecedented prison population includes 1000s of men who default on child support payments, irrespective of their indigent circumstances. The working-classes, who precariously remain
on the outside of prison walls, are either debt slaves or wage slaves. Thus the
working classes of the USA can be categorised as follows: prison slaves who
labour for 20 cents on the hour or less, debt-slaves, who are owned by the banks
and wage-slaves, who are owned by corporations such as McDonalds. To become more servile and docile than they
are, Americans would literally have to learn to walk on their knees with their
heads deferentially bowed and tilted in the direction to the Whitehouse. I have not even discussed that other
paralysing dimension of mass slavery – religion.

The 'masters' are not collecting more slaves or even
seeking to tighten the shackles of predacious mercantilism upon the limbs of
the body-politic, the appendages of which,
are so profoundly spastic they actually admire their overseers, while hating
those further down the ‘chain’ of slavery. There is an agenda in play in Empire
USA and it has little to do with the repealing of the constitutional right to
bear arms, and by extension stripping the herd of their last and only means of
resistance.

In 2001 no-one could have
foretold the phenomenal success of the social networking and media platforms
Facebookand YouTube, introduced to a world starving for alternative media in 2004 and 2005 respectively. With the exceptions of perhaps North
Korea and Afghanistan, every adult on this planet either has a Facebookor YouTubeaccount or
knows someone who has.

In theory these unprecedented media platforms can
provide any one individual an audience of millions. Individuals, whether sane or
insane, rich or poor, can in real time post any amount of data, media and
information at little or no cost and thought at all. No futurist, no matter how
prescient they may have been in 1991 or 2001, could have predicted the meteoric
rise and universality of these information platforms. This development includes WikiLeaks, the
much maligned and sabotaged World Wide Web wildcard by the ruling elites in the
Anglosphere.

"The USA is the enemy of humanity" (Ernesto "Che" Guevara).

“New Coke” was introduced in 1985 by the Coca Cola Company in its unquenchable thirst to dominate market share of
soft-drinks. The “New Coke” marketing strategy turned out to be the worst business decision of the twentieth century. Consumers were so disgusted with
the new recipe, they protested by publicly pouring the brand down street drains. Coca Cola promptly came to its senses and restored the original
brand. The New Coke flop has since remained
the colloquial benchmark for suicidal commercial adventurism in the business
community. Nothing, no amount of corporate self-destructive bungling could it
seem ever surpass the notorious New Coke blunder.

The 1985 "New Coke" product release backfired on Coca Cola forcing it to restore the original brand.

Condemned Cancerous Conspirators

When Silverstein, (with Westfield owner, Frank Lowy), bought the 99 year lease to the towers he, along with New York City, was well aware the moribund towers were condemned cancerous structures riddled with asbestos. Silverstein’s bizarre acquisition of the toxic towers must stand as an egregious self-inflicted transaction 100 times more defective than the
doomed episode to replace an iconic brand product with “New Coke” (see Ken O'Keefe's WTC asbestos report 2016). Asbestos abatement alone of the Towers was estimated at a cost of some 3 billion dollars, rendering the ownership of the Towers into perhaps, the worlds largest liability in recorded history.When asked why he purchased the diseased towers,
Silverstein coyly replied “I’ve always wanted to own the towers”. Ironically the best, or at least, the surest
way to detoxify the sky-scrapers with their estimated 400 tonnes of asbestos was to pulverise them. Even this method of
obliteration would have entailed enormous cost, requiring perhaps half of the
city to be evacuated.

Lucky Larry, as Silverstein has become
widely known, ‘fortunately’ redeemed his incredible lapse in business judgement
by enlarging the insurance policy on the towers to include payouts for separate
attacks or "catastrophic events". The man was prescient, as the WTC was indeed attacked on 2 separate occasions by 2 ‘airliners’. Thus the Insurers were subsequently compelled to shell out some 4 billion dollars to Lucky Larry. Silverstein, who had put up 14 million dollarsof his own funds towards purchasing the WTC lease, was seeking 7 billion dollars for each demolished tower (a) Source - see CNN (2004) news item below. In 2008 Silverstein undertook litigation against the airports / airlines involved in the 911 'hijackings' suing for some 12 billion dollars (b) (Source - New York Times 2008). According to a Wall Street Journal article, dated 18 July 2013, Silverstein eventually failed in this monumental episode of avarice litigation.NOTESa. The judge overseeing the original matter of Silverstein litigation was a hand-picked Zionist Jew: in falsely projecting an environment of legal objectivity, Silverstein most likely grossly inflated his original insurance demand, allowing the compatriot Zionist judge to issue a discounted verdict, thereby muting critics, who would allege collaboration between the pair.b. Silverstein's 2008 episode of astronomical litigation may merely be an additional 'inflated' sham undertaken to further confuse critics and conspiracy theorists alike. Incidentally, compatriot Jewish Judge Hellerstein 'adjudicated' the case. It is further noted: in both cases of litigation, there were a number of litigants in addition to Silverstein, who acted as the principal litigant Conflicting internet sources exist as to the exact monies Silverstein invested towards the WTC lease purchase in 2001 - different sources claim 14 million ranging to 100 million dollars. Additional sources claim Silverstein walked away with a cool 5 billion dollars profit, Even though SIlverstein partially reinvested the insurance payoff into the new tower, the collateral investment in the "Freedom Tower" is owned by Silverstein outright.NB: An accurate detailed chronological history of Silverstein's post-9/11 litigation is beyond the amateur scope of this essay. Neither does this Author claim to possess complete and exhaustive knowledge on the subject. Readers who wish to pursue this avenue further can begin here - a site dedicated to the topic. This site appears to provide a historic overview of the litigation procedures undertaken by Silverstein, however, its accuracy and thoroughness is unknown. Readers serious about further researching this critical aspect of 9/11 are advised to petition the same Manhattan courthouse for verbatim case transcripts. The general consensus of many 9/11 observers and investigators is Silverstein reaped a multi-billion dollar profit from insurance payouts; the highest award in history. This fact alone warrants abundant cause for criminal investigation of Silverstein and Lowy - cui bono, as the Romans once posed.

One of the indestructible passports recovered on a NYC side-walk. Incredibly every atom, every particle of the 2 crashed planes vaporised! Clearly, the laws of physics were miraculously inverted on that particular day. There is no other explanation!

Although Lucky Larry had the 'foresight' to renegotiate the WTC insurance policy to anticipate multiple
attacks, he along with his cabal of Straussianconspirators, did not predict the rise of
the Internet and specifically its global information sharing applications. And because
the Internet and its alternative media platforms such as YouTubeand Facebook
were not anticipated by the conspirators, they have been unable to mitigate the
damage these tools have inflicted against their conspiracy.

The US Government has become so irredeemably mendacious and predacious, its only a matter of time before it cannibalises its own population, (best outcome), or immolates the entire world. (Author)

In terms of progressing an authentic
investigation into the 9/11 crimes, this is the stalemate we are facing – a
massive cyber movement, largely if not completely ignored by mainstream media,
to globally denounce the real perpetrators, and by extension demonstrate to the
wantonly ignorant masses, government (hijacked or otherwise) has been the
primary source of evil wracking modern-day society.

By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War (a commonly accepted translation of a former MOSSAD motto).A counter-strategy by the Zionist conspirators has been to publish media designed to debunk 9/11 conspiracy theories. One of the most prominent 'non-government' / private publications in defence of the official narrative of 19 Arabs with box-cutters, has of course been the magazine "Popular Mechanics" (see Benjamin Chertoff article March 2005 on-line edition). This 'outfit' also published a book on the subject 'subtly' titled "Debunking 9/11 Myths, Why Conspiracy Theorists Cant Stand Up to the Facts(2006)". The 'novel' is little more than an inflation of the original junk article by Chertoff in 2005.On the topic of Building 7 and its inexplicable collapse, the Editors of Debunking 9/11 Myths, Dunbar and Reagan, instruct the Reader how the structural integrity of Building 7 was eventually and catastrophically compromised by the phenomenon of "thermal expansion". The Editors go on to explain the steel support frames gradually expanded from the heat produced by the office fires causing the detachment and debilitation of the bolts securing the steel frames and support columns. At a shallow glance (i.e. ignoring the documented fact Building 7 collapsed at free-fall speed for approx 3 seconds, a circumstance grudgingly conceded by the corrupt NIST report, along with the observable fact Building 7 was afflicted by small isolated office furniture fires) this postulation seems plausible, but abjectly fails to explain (1) why Building 7 collapsed with perfect or rather demolition symmetry; and (2) no other burning building, let alone buildings undergoing small office fires, in history has ever experienced the same calamity of thermal expansion leading to catastrophic global structural failure. The thermal expansion argument also fails to account for the additional 'phenomenon' of BBC and several of its establishment co-broadcasters reporting on the collapse some 20 minutes prior to the actual collapse.

The notorious Israeli spy ring cover - Urban Moving - the mural on the van's side is an example of Israeli dark humour

The publication "Debunking 9/11 Myths" is paradoxically mostly bunkum itself lending further credence, through the desperate, selective and overall shoddy tone of the counter-narrative, to the suspicion 9/11 was indeed an "Inside Job". Another sample of its duplicitous 'debunking' efforts is its take on the correlating wing-span impact of the Boeing 757 into the Pentagon building wall. Citing Mete Sozen, Professor of Civil Engineering at Purdue University, the Editors scoff at the 'mystery' of how a commercial jetliner smashed into the side of the Pentagon without leaving a "cartoon-like outline" (p 99). They proffer a suite of fanciful notions why the impact hole is much smaller than the wing-span of the jet. The wings, according to the Editors, likely sheared off prior to full impact because of the force generated by the initial impact of the plane's nose. Alternatively, the plane's wings were pulverised by striking objects en-route to the building including the ground below the point of impact, and in any case, again quoting Sozen, crashed planes don't leave "cartoonish" imprints. Yet when the Reader reviews video capturing the attack on the 2nd tower, He can plainly discern the impossible "cartoonish" outline made by the plane's wing-span irrespective of the simultaneous pulverising engulfing fireball. Possibly the biggest whopper (among many substantial whoppers) invented by the Authors of Debunking 9/11 Myths is their inexplicable and indeed inexcusable claim that: "Though Reynolds and a handful of other skeptics cite academic credentials to lend credence to their views, not one of the leading conspiracy theorists has a background in engineering, construction, or related fields. (pg. 28-29)" [my italics].

In fact the truth movement, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, boast a muster of some 2000 experts in a diversity of "related fields" including architecture, ordnance, construction, psychology, physics, mathematics, metallurgists, electronics, aviation and engineering. Again these rebuttals by so-called Debunkers are sheer transparent fabrications, begging the question who exactly do the Debunkers think they are deceiving? It is this Author's view the more prominent Debunkers across Europe and North America are remunerated shills whose remit it is, is to continually disorient the general or mainstream public with blatant lies, as the same cohort of amateur observers, possess neither the skills nor initiative to challenge the lies. In other words, the Debunker shills care little how easily their lies and subterfuge are repudiated by the experts, as their intended audience is the curious impressionable public orbiting around the 9/11 Truth movement.

The ItaliansItalian documentary film producer, Massimo Mazzucco, has by far, published the definitive 9/11 expose - 9/11 The New Pearl Harbour (2013). In his 5 hour long meticulous investigation, Mazzucco patently repudiates or rather debunks the 'Debunkers', who persistently counter with half-truths, distortion, disinformation and blatant lies to the 9/11 Truth Movement. These debunked Debunkers include the notorious and largely discredited crew from Popular Mechanics whose fabrications and falsehoods have become increasingly absurd as new evidence comes to light. For example, one of the grand fables, peddled by the Debunkers is that air traffic controllers (both civil and defence) were unable to track all 4 hijacked planes, because the hijackers switched off the transponders and hence the same planes could not be intercepted by fighter jets This is an outright lie as Mazzucco demonstrates with video interviews of the actual flight controllers, who explained, even with the transponders off, air traffic control was still able to track and identify the flights. What air traffic control could not identify, was the speed and altitude of those planes with disabled transponders, but the planes' flight path was continuously tracked up until their alleged impact i.e. swapped out with drones.Another massive myth marketed by the Debunkers is that cellular calls were possible at altitudes above 10 000 feet. This critical Debunker lie is pushed in order to account for the multiple mysterious cellular calls both passengers and crew were allegedly able to place at altitudes above 10 000 all the way up to 30 000 feet, while rocketing through the stratosphere at 500 mph. This claim is so ludicrous it should be ignored, however it has been bought by many observers. In response Mazzucco explains that even if cellular calls were able to connect from an altitude of 10 000 feet in 2001, the calls would drop every 3 seconds or less as the plane careened from cellular tower to tower. This is because the signal handover from tower to tower could not match the speed of the jet above, and thus the signal would simply drop between the towers. Italian Nobel Laureate, Dario Fo, participated in a similar investigative Italian documentary titled, Zero: An Investigation into 9/11 (2008). This production, directed by Franco Fracassi and Francesco Trento, was regarded as the definitive 9/11 documentary until it was superseded by Mazzucco's grand effort in 2013. Nonetheless Fracassi and Trento's version remains very relevant and is mandatory viewing for serious 9/11 researchers. The undisputed star of the documentary, Dario Fo, methodically and mockingly deconstructs the official narrative, demonstrating the ludicrousness of how we are expected to believe a small impact aperture in a Pentagon wall swallowed up a massive 757 airliner in its entirety, while leaving absolutely no trace of wreckage. Dario does acknowledge however, weeks after the outrageous fraud, images depicting alleged American Airlines 77 lawn wreckage 'magically' began circulating the internet in support of the government's narrative.Metallurgy expert, Paolo Marini, (Italian Centre for Materials Development), researched the flagrantly conspicuous collapse speeds of the Towers. Marini concluded the Towers, in particular, the South Tower, fell at free-fall, (Bridge, R; Incredible Inconsistencies and Bizarre Coincidences of the 9/11 Fairy Tale, 2009; and The Events of September the 11th, webpage). This incontrovertible and astounding evidence scientifically establishes the fact, hundreds of thousands of tonnes of structural resistance had magically vanished, thus permitting the buildings to symmetrically drop, (and vaporise), in utter defiance of the laws of physics and fundamental engineering principals. If you believe this official version of events, please seek urgent medical advice. One of the most successful disinformation scams perpetrated by both Debunkers and the US Government is the titanic tale the Twin Towers could not withstand the ferocious impact of the planes, and ergo collapsed in on themselves. Coincidentally, this myth was inadvertently preempted by the Italian-American Construction Manager of the WTC complex, Frank De Martini. De Martini explained in a documentary interview several months prior to the attack, the Towers were designed "to withstand multiple impacts from passengers jets". De Martini also perished on that day as he heroically remained inside one of the Towers to assist in the evacuations.Information CharadesAs one would expect a number of debunking internet portals have been developed to complement other Debunker media. The portal - 911/myths- appears to be a prominent debunking site. Such debunking media should not be avoided by Readers. Portals and publications of this genre should be reviewed not for the 'merits' of its counter-conspiracy narrative, (it is unquestionably merit-less), rather it should be studied for its shoddy duplicity, omission and distortion of 9/11 facts and forensics. This particular shambolic debunking project is pathetic in its absurd attempts to diminish and distort history, reminiscent of the crackpot science sponsored by the magazine Popular Mechanics.CNN correspondent Jamie McIntyre was at the Pentagon site shortly after the attack. McIntyre reported: "From my close up inspection their is no evidence of an airline crash, no large debris, no wing, tail sections or fuselage". McIntyre later fullyrecanted his "my close - up inspection" report, making the bizarre and ludicrous counter-claim his "close-up" description on live television was taken out of context because he was quoting somebody else at the site (see McIntyre's recant). Interestingly this critical live eye-witness account has never been re-aired (unedited) on commercial television. Neither was this first-hand account addressed or 'debunked' by Popular Mechanics. (Jamie McIntyre news report CNN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07Bn_CC_mrg).

The undeclared agenda of Sunstein's paper was to endorse the official government 9/11 narrative of a band of ruthless bumbling Islamic fundamentalists, armed with nothing more than box-cutters, being entirely responsible for the World Trade Centre and Pentagon attacks. Simultaneously Sunstein's explicit objective was to support government infiltration of "sealed" (Sunstein 2009) conspiracy theory groups to dissolve and disunite the same with counter-information or "information cascades" (ibid) in favour of benevolent and pious 'democratic' governments.

Not unlike Chertoff's original piece of bunkum, Sunstein's publication is so full of holes, it could be used as a colander to rinse lettuce leaves. The propagandist bias, the ethical and logical contradictions, the wanton disregard for reality, the 'convenient omission' of facts and the overall amateur nature of the composition is breath-taking, more so, that this piece of fawning and fantastical diatribe was published in a 'once' esteemed journal for social sciences. These defects are exacerbated by the author's own ethnic and career incentives, a blatant conflict of interest not declared by the Jewish American academic.

The prevailing conspiracy theory that 9/11 was a joint Israel and US false-flag operation, a suspicion, which in spite of Sunstein's absurdly transparent attempt to dispel, is gaining traction daily. "Consider" (a command phrase used repeatedly throughout the author's pseudo science on conspiracies) the undeclared fact Sunstein is himself a Jew possessing therefore an obvious racial, political (Zionist) and cultural interest, if not bias in deflecting 9/11 suspicion away from Israel. Additionally, Sunstein's multiple lucrative 'policy' contracts with the same United States government he seeks to exculpate, if not canonise, cannot be overlooked.

The debunking efforts by minion Zionist authors are riddled with holes, synonymous with a colander.

When the Pentagon attack is reviewed within a tactical framework, the narrative of a commercial airliner piloted into the side of the building further unravels. The official story goes something like this: without being challenged, the hijackers enter Washington DC airspace , undertake a pointless though extremely cumbersome loop of the Capitol to eventually strike the rear of the Pentagon, smashing into an external wall, causing relatively minor damage.

In real life, Islamic hijackers bent on harming the USA would have executed their mission very differently, for example: instead of striking the Pentagon, the primary target would have been the Whitehouse - a Boeing 757 jet smashing into the Whitehouse would irrevocably decimate the historic building, and in turn destroy the icon of anglo - American Judea-Christian supremacy and culture, (including the potential of killing the POTUS). The same could be posited for the United States Congress, an especially easy surface target with its massive beaming dome, situated around the corner. Alternatively, if the Pentagon was really a target for the hijackers, then instead of striking this 5 ring deep 'asset' from behind, the 'weaponized plane' should have been directed toward the main entrance of the asset, or even of more strategic or 'terroristic' value, towards the inner rings of the building. Instead the plane was crashed into the outer E ring, a site which had recently been under repair and thus partially unoccupied. This same innocuous site or "Wedge One" was reputed to accommodate auditors investigating the "unaccounted" 2.3 trillion dollars from the defence budget, which Rumsfeld coincidentally announced the day before on the 10 September 2001.The dastardly hijackers literally had a bonanza of targets with devastating magnitude at their disposal that morning. Inexplicably, the ruthless scheming 'Arabs' chose to forgo the Whitehouse (and the POTUS), CIA Headquarters, Capitol Hill and the Pentagon inner rings and executive lobby to pointlessly conduct an incredibly difficult flight manoeuvre by circumventing the Capitol, allegedly knocking down street lamps along the way, to attack an insignificant Pentagon rear exterior wall.

Instead of crashing into the 'rings' or main lobby to cause maximum carnage,the hijackers inexplicably preferred an irrelevant exterior rear wall - the "outer E ring"

A final word on 'strategic terrorism'. Assuming the concoction 19 box-cutting maniacal warriors were real, and were 'devious' enough to simultaneously commandeer 4 commercial airliners, would not these same American hating 'demons' steer all 4 weaponized planes to Washington DC to then literally cripple the military and political nerve centre of the USA?Why bother with replaceable structures of commerce, when 'irreplaceable' military, cultural and political assets could have been obliterated within the space of 2 hours.

Not only were the laws of physics, including Isaac Newton Laws of Motion, rewritten that day, common sense too, it seems, was redefined.No Plane Theory, CGI, Composites, Holograms and Drones

In the same lecture, Bollyn observes that on the morning of 9/11, over 3000 Israelis were warned, by way of a SMS dispatch transmitted by an Israeli based telco, (ODIGO) to 'take the day off' from both the WTC and the Pentagon. This monumental claim of prior knowledge first appeared within weeks following the disaster, yet no hard data has, at least to this Author's knowledge, issued to substantiate the allegation beyond 'gossip'. Unfortunately, Bollyn makes the mistake of loosely parroting this vast indictment without supporting the accusation with data. Despite this lapse in academic objectivity,Bollyn's presentationis an excellent starting point for those Readers wishing to grasp the enormity and complexity of the Zionist infiltration and domination of the US Government. Bollyn's profound analysis is the accumulation of his research and others, across a span of some 14 years. It is not to be dismissed lightly.The historical truth the Bush administration, along with its recent POTUS predecessors, (and currently the Obama administration), was ubiquitously penetrated by Zionists, many with dual American and Israeli citizenship, is indisputable. It is thus re-asserted, only 2 types of observers would seek to refute such an abundantly and accessible documented fact: (1) collaborators (2) crackpots.

Luckily, Lucky Larry and his 2 off-spring did NOT turn up for work at WTC on 9/11. By Silverstein's own admission they were delayed or diverted for skin-care appointments!

They Can’t Break the Internet

Let’s face it, if Kim
Kardashian’s premium mammaries could not break the Internet then what chance
does a cabal of ageing reptilian and contiguous Neo-Cons and Zionists stand.

Against tradition, the popularity of internet exposes on 9/11, rather than abating, continues to excel some 15 years after the event. New 9/11 cyber analyses are being added daily to an existing canon of thousands. This unrelenting and cumulative trend does not bode well for the real league of conspirators, and, it is this Author's view, within the near future, Congress will be 'compelled' to legislate against the publication of 'conspiracy theories' on the behest of the genuine perpetrators. Alternatively major internet media platforms, Facebook and YouTube among others, under Establishment duress, will 'self-police'. Thus with a click of a cursor, the most popular internet media platforms will purge all existing 9/11 'conspiracy theory' media, while prohibiting the posting of new material. This Author predicts 2017 as the time-frame for the implementation of dramatic internet restrictions and censorship. National Security 'sexed up' with terrorism will be cited as the principal reason for curtailing on-line "free-speech".UPDATE: This censorship prediction has partially materialised with the recent production of the hysterical narrative of "fake news" and the declaration by numerous media empires, (google and facebook) along with Trump, to prosecute a war against fake news. It is only a matter of time before 9/11 conspiracy narratives are relegated to the canon of "fake news" and deleted (Panaia, 18 February 2017).

Fortunately for humanity, the
Internetis not yet monopolised or neutralised, leaving the conspirators few
options for retaliation. One option, distraction and diversion, stands out
amongst the rest, and it is this subject on which this essay will draw to a
close.

There are many ways to distract
the community, however, by far the most effective strategy is the creation and
inflation of fear. Fear mongering has long been peddled throughout the USA.
Recall the WMD fiasco where entire nations of people were scammed by the likes
of G.W. Bush and Tony Blair, the consequence of which has seen the Iraqi
civilisation haemorrhaging ever since. Such psych warfare tactics – distraction
and diversion – are the conspirator’s most reliable weapon against an already
semi-comatosed population. In order for the real 911 perpetrators to remain
under the radar of mass-awareness, a program of distraction must constantly be deployed
against the collective consciousness. Domestic false-flags and foreign
invasions will retard the analytical skills of any nation. People will simply
be too pre-occupied and outraged with the eruption of the latest false-flag incident
or elevation of the “National Terrorism Advisory System” to re-focus on a massive
traitorous crime, whose psychological impact continues to fade with the passage
of time.

Wildcard - The Internet

In summary, the immediate future
for the USA looks bleaker. If this analysis is correct, many more false-flag
eruptions, accompanied by bellicose moron politicians aiming to ‘liberate
enemy-regimes’ by bombing the same back to the stone-age, are sketched on a
blood red horizon. Therefore the
principal objective of the true 911 architects is to overwhelm and suffocate
the urge for critical thinking triggered by alternative media realms, such as
YouTube, Facebook and WikiLeaks. This objective will be achieved by the
dissemination of more fear and xenophobia through repeated gruesome acts of
domestic carnage, whether staged or otherwise, and the increased demonization
and destruction of the Muslim world.

NEW YORK (CNN) -- A jury handed some bad news Thursday to the man leasing the World Trade Center site with a verdict that denied him double insurance payments.
Larry Silverstein signed the lease just six weeks before the WTC's twin towers were brought to the ground by terrorists in the September 11, 2001, attacks.
Silverstein contended that the two jetliners crashing into the twin towers about 15 minutes apart should be considered two separate events, which would allow him to collect the maximum from the insurers for each tower, as much as $7 billion.
The insurance companies insisted that the attacks should be considered a single event, cutting in half the amount Silverstein can collect.
After a three-month trial, jurors decided Thursday that the attacks should be considered a single event for nine insurance companies, which together are responsible for at least $1 billion in coverage.
But the 11-person jury could not reach a verdict on Silverstein's dispute with Swiss Reinsurance Co. -- the largest of the World Trade Center's insurers, responsible for 25 percent of its coverage.
U.S. District Judge Michael Mukasey accepted the partial verdict but told the jury to continue deliberating on the dispute involving Swiss Reinsurance, known as Swiss Re.
Silverstein, 72, leased the World Trade Center from its owner, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, in July 2001. The 99-year lease requires him to rebuild and he is depending on the insurance payout to do that.
The government agency overseeing the project, the Lower Manhattan Development Corp., has also factored the payout into its plans.

'Series of similar causes'

Silverstein has been chosen to develop Freedom Tower, a 2 million-square-foot, 1,776-foot-tall skyscraper, and plans as many as four other office buildings on the site. He is already building a 52-story office tower where World Trade Center 7 stood until it collapsed in the wake of the attacks.
After leasing the complex, Silverstein negotiated with 24 insurance companies for a maximum coverage of $3.55 billion per catastrophic occurrence. However, the agreements had not been finalized before 9/11.
The trial's central issue was whether a document drafted by Silverstein's insurance broker in June 2001 was in effect at the time of the attacks.
That form classified damages as a single occurrence if they were attributable to "one cause or a series of similar causes."
Silverstein contended that document had been supplanted by a second form which did not include a definition of "occurrence," opening the door for collecting separately for each tower. But attorney for Swiss Re, Barry Ostrager, called that a "fanciful claim."
The jury ruled that nine of Silverstein's insurers were bound by the first document, relieving them from double damages, but that three others were not.
A second trial will be held to decide if the insurance policies of those three companies, along with six other insurers not involved in the trial, allow Silverstein to collect the maximum payout once or twice.
An appeals court found last year that three other insurers were not bound by the June 2001 document and owed Silverstein $112 million, the amount payable for a single occurrence. Two other companies settled with Silverstein for $400 million.
Ken Erickson, a lawyer for Lloyds Syndicate, one of the nine firms who won in court Thursday, said he was "gratified with the verdict."
"It was a very diligent and very attentive jury over a long trial. We tried to present a straightforward story to them, which we think was the necessary basis on which they resolved this case," he said.
Howard Rubeinstein, a spokesman for Silverstein, declined to comment on the case until the jury finishes its deliberations on Swiss Re.
The nine firms relieved of double damages by the jury Thursday were Lloyds Syndicate, Wurtembergische, Federal Insurance, Employers Insurance of Wausau, Great Lakes Reinsurance, QBE International Insurance Ltd., Lexington Insurance Company, Copenhagen Reinsurance and Houston Casualty.

Developer Sues to Win $12.3 Billion in 9/11 Attack

Larry A. Silverstein, who has won nearly $4.6 billion in insurance payments to cover his losses and help him rebuild at the World Trade Center site, is seeking $12.3 billion in damages from airlines and airport security companies for the 9/11 attack.
Mr. Silverstein, the developer of ground zero, sought the damages, whose amount was not previously known, in a claim filed in 2004, that says the airlines and airport security companies failed to prevent terrorists from hijacking the planes used to destroy the buildings.
His case was consolidated last week with similar, earlier lawsuits brought by families of some victims of the attack and by other property owners. But in seeking $12.3 billion, he is by far the biggest claimant in the litigation.
The size of Mr. Silverstein’s claim was revealed last week at a status conference on the litigation in United States District Court in Manhattan.
The claims by the parties involved total about $23 billion, and Mr. Silverstein’s claim for such a large chunk could jeopardize claims from other businesses and property owners, according to defense lawyers. A lawyer for the victims’ families, Donald Migliori, said he was confident that their claims would not be affected because they would take priority over the property claims.
A lawyer for the airlines, Desmond Barry, said that if Mr. Silverstein won his claim, he could push the total claims beyond the amount of insurance that the airlines and security companies have available. “There ain’t that much insurance,” Mr. Barry said.
The federal government has capped the liability at the amount of available insurance, to avoid bankrupting the airlines. The exact amount of insurance available is still being explored in the court proceedings.
Richard A. Williamson, a lawyer for Mr. Silverstein, said at the court conference on March 18 that Mr. Silverstein was seeking damages to compensate him for continuing losses at the site. Mr. Silverstein, through his company, World Trade Center Properties, has a 99-year lease, worth $3.2 billion, on four buildings at the site, including the fallen twin towers. He signed the lease in July 2001, just six weeks before the attack.
Since the attack, Mr. Silverstein has been paying rent to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey on towers that no longer exist, his lawyer told the judge, Alvin K. Hellerstein. Mr. Williamson said that his client had also lost rental income from about 400 tenants.
Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Mr. Silverstein, said that the $12.3 billion represented $8.4 billion for the replacement value of the destroyed buildings and $3.9 billion in other costs, including $100 million a year in rent to the Port Authority and $300 million a year in lost rental income, as well as the cost of marketing and leasing the new buildings.
Mr. Barry, speaking for the airlines, contended that Mr. Silverstein had been more than compensated by the nearly $4.6 billion insurance settlement, reached after almost six years of litigation. He argued that Mr. Silverstein was entitled to the market value of the property, which he said had been established by the $3.2 billion lease.
Judge Hellerstein expressed skepticism about Mr. Silverstein’s claim, and asked why he had not stemmed his losses by just “walking away.”
Turning to Mr. Williamson, Judge Hellerstein asked: “What’s the nature of your recovery?”
To which Mr. Williamson replied, “For damages suffered by the events of 9/11, not value. Damages.”
Mr. Williamson said that the lease required Mr. Silverstein to rebuild and to continue paying rent.
“And so I’m putting to you if you walked away from the lease, you would lose the value of the lease,” Judge Hellerstein said. “Would you have a further obligation to pay money?”
Mr. Williamson replied, “You have to examine that question. “But to me that’s not the test of what are our damages.”
Judge Hellerstein pressed Mr. Williamson to put a dollar figure on the damages. “I don’t think it’s necessary to know the precise amount,” the judge said. “I think some order of magnitude would be appropriate.”
When Mr. Williamson balked, Mr. Barry jumped in.
“I think their claim is $12.3 billion,” he said.
“Plus prejudgement interest,” Mr. Williamson confirmed.
To which the judge tartly replied, “We shouldn’t forget that.”
Judge Hellerstein ordered Mr. Silverstein to provide more documentation of his claim, or risk losing it.
Mr. McQuillan, the spokesman for Mr. Silverstein, said on Wednesday the developer felt both an obligation under his lease and a moral obligation to rebuild, rather than walk away. He said that the insurance companies who paid him would be repaid if he prevails.
Plaintiffs also revealed that after a spate of settlements, there are seven wrongful death cases and two injury cases remaining, out of more than 90 filed.
Those who sued represent just a small fraction of the casualties on Sept. 11. Most of the victims of the attack and their families chose to take the compensation offered through a federal fund, forgoing their right to sue.
Mr. Migliori, the lawyer for victims’ survivors, said he believed that the claimants with property-damage claims — including Mr. Silverstein and some insurance companies trying to recoup their payments — would allow the death and injury cases to get priority in payment of damages.
The judge declined to set any trial date in the case, saying that it would be “fictitious,” but set a fact-finding deadline at the end of this year. Any trials in the case appear to be more than a year away.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

I possess a borderline dull intellect; diagnosed by a 'child psychologist' many years ago. Additionally, I suffer from brain damage, having been chronically abused and emotionally neglected by the 'Pious' Sisters at the St Vincent Foundling Home, where I spent the first 5 years of life.
Further, I have been described by numerous 'statutory authorities', as mentally defective, retarded, disturbed and idiotic.
And I have the documents to substantiate all the above!