ISRAEL'S OLMERT AND THE FINE ART OF MANIPULATION: Globalists prefer democracies
over tyrannies because the former are so much easier to manipulate
by Barry Chamish

December 15, 2003

The globalists prefer democracies over tyrannies because the former are so
much easier to manipulate to their will. Take those recent Southern California
fires, all started by escaped arsons working in well planned coordination. Not
two months after the last flames are doused, Pres. Bush introduces a new forestry
bill designed to prevent future fires by handing chopping privileges over every
acre of the nation's woodlands to the logging industry in perpetuity. All it
cost was a few thousand homes to conjure up the hellish images needed to push
the bill through.

Michael Jackson is busted on child molestation charges and not three weeks later
comes the announcement that a new anti-pedophilic surveillance system will be
introduced to the playgrounds and schools of America, the value of which will
likely exceed the logging windfall, plus the added bonus of a national consensus
in favor of every neighborhood being watched.

With Saddam's fall, the Iraqis have traded in one dictatorship for another,
more subtle one. Spreading democracy means spreading tyranny. Bending a people's
will becomes so much simpler when the facade of freedom is instated.

Take a look what's been happening lately in Israel. The globalists are united
in arranging Israel's demise and are busy reducing the country to undefendable
borders. Are they ever busy! Most Israelis see the Beilin Geneva Accord as basically
harmless, when it should be viewed as basically treasonous. Admittedly, the
thought did cross a few minds that since the money behind it was European, they
were being manipulated by foreigners. But no one uttered a peep when the front
man for this funding was announced as one Alexis Keller, who funneled his father
Pierre's fortune at Beilin. Papa Keller is VP of the International Red Cross
of Holocaust ignoral fame and which singles out Israel for membership refusal.
Nor did many understand the significance of Colin Powell of the Council On Foreign
Relations inviting Beilin to his office to discuss his "useful" initiative.

The Geneva signing was a publicity stunt coordinated with the highest ranks
of the Israeli government and media to fool the Jews out of their homes in Judea,
Samaria and Gaza. Just previous to it was the murder of three disarmed soldiers,
two of them young girls, in Netzarim, preparing the ground for the withdrawal
from the village, but what interests us now are the days following the Geneva
performance. Here are a number of incidents, seemingly unrelated, but they are
not:

* A 90 year old former hack Jerusalem Post TV writer named Philip Gillon dies
and Haaretz devotes a page to his removal from our midst. To give you an idea
of what a despicable character he was; when the soldiers' vote of 1984 prevented
a Labor victory, he wrote that his fondest wish was to see them all die in battle.
The page consisted of two eulogies. One was written by Jerrold Kessel, CNN's
Israel correspondent, yes the selfsame CNN founded by Ted Turner of the CFR,
and other was written by P. Gillon's nephew Carmi Gillon; yes the selfsame former
head of the Shabak and it's Jewish department, responsible for innumerable crimes
including the Hebron massacre of 1994 and the Rabin assassination, which he
planned with Shimon Peres. In his self-serving little piece of mind-twisting,
he wrote that he had some personal problems with uncle Philip, who was just
too left-wing for his tastes.

* If the irony of Gillon's parting words to his uncle were lost on the readers
of Haaretz, the events surrounding another character in the Rabin assassination
shouldn't have been. Dr. Yehuda Hiss was the pathologist who changed Rabin's
wounds for the public. He also steals body parts from fallen soldiers, hapless
tourists, and whoever goes near his scalpel. But these crimes didn't bother
attorney general Elyakim Rubinstein who ruled that the Hiss crimes weren't worthy
of prosecution. And not one editorial in the Israeli mainstream media condemned
this ugly aberration of basic justice. The globalists know if the Rabin murder
truth ever gets out, their primary agents in the Israeli government, those who
brought us the joys of Oslo, will fall like kingpins and take their Oslos and
roadmaps down with them. Media and court manipulation are the primary defences,
but co-opting those who once fought to have the facts exposed is useful as well,
as we shall soon see.

* After shutting down the popular radio voice of the Resistance, Arutz Sheva,
the Shabak started rounding up those pesky local leaders who were likely to
organize the fight against withdrawal. Fourteen innocent men have been arrested
without charge, and placed in intolerable
prison conditions under an obscure but highly exploited procedure known as administrative
detention. The most highly publicized case is that of Noam Federman, who is
now a cause celebre in certain rightist circles. However, more than a few clear
thinkers smell a rat here. The well publicized appalling state of Federman's
incarceration is just too obvious. It serves the timely purpose of scaring away
other protesters from public activity opposing the upcoming withdrawal.

* The climax of the manipulation were the announcements of the leaders of the
Right that they favored withdrawal. Within two days of each other, Chief of
Staff Mofaz ordered the removal of three outposts to begin with, and PM Sharon
declared his unilateral withdrawal plan. But the greatest impact belongs to
former Jerusalem mayor and Likud stalwart, the Trade Minister Ehud Olmert. In
Stage One of his role, he agreed to specially label all products from beyond
the Green Line, so importers worldwide can have an easier time of boycotting
them. He may as well just have put a yellow Star Of David on the labels. Then,
four days after the Geneva ceremony, he declared his advocacy of a near complete
withdrawal from those places cited on the labels. AND the timing was not coincidental.
By the weekend, Yediot Achronot's poll now showed that over half of Israelis
favor withdrawal, with 58% favoring Netzarim first. This shattering change of
public perception proves how well coordinated manipulation succeeds in a "democracy."

HOW THEY GOT TO OLMERT

Last night (14/12/03) I set my book table down at a rally against Olmert at
the Jerusalem Theatre. Olmert was being given a freedom award by the Israel
Media Watch, an act itself inconceivable enough to sow confusion. We now return
once again to that Rabin assassination, which must be kept under wraps at all
cost.
The gentleman who handed Olmert his prize was Yisrael Medad, not long ago a
central figure in the battle to expose the events leading up to the murder of
Rabin. In the months leading up to the assassination, the government-owned Channel
One tv channel, its head Moti Kirschenbaum and a director Eitan Oren, staged
two reports of a dangerous hyper-radical organization called Eyal, whose most
prominent and only leaders were Avishai Raviv and Yigal Amir, both Shabak agents
provocateur. Medad led the battle to expose this piece of deadly media manipulation,
going so far as to submit a (losing) petition to the Supreme Court to indict
Kirschenbaum and Oren for fraud.

Medad lives in those very territories which Olmert decided warranted special
labeling and had to be withdrawn from anyway. So why would he give his sworn
enemy a prize for media honesty? And there is more. An astute activist at the
rally, Gemma Blech informed me,"I attended Medad's lecture at the Ariel
College media conference last month. He went over some examples of media bias
and repression but didn't once mention the closure of Arutz Sheva. After his
speech, I asked him why and he walked away from me without saying a word."

The last person I would have suspected of such easy co-option would have been
Medad. That means that everyone is a candidate for it, including, certain members
of the Yesha Council.

The speakers at this rally, just didn't get it. They actually accused Olmert
of jumping ship for political advantage. Nothing more sinister than that. But
Olmert was blackmailed, or bribed, probably a combination of both and ordered
to play ball with disaster. Only one suspicious lady at the rally said so: "They
got him the same way they got Sharon, through his son. His second son Ariel
is a homosexual draft dodger who has more than enough scandalous behavior to
hide."

A good try but with Olmert, there is no need to go for his son. Olmert is a
crook and always has been. Allow me to present a few choice snippets from my
book, The Fall Of Israel (Canongate Publishers, Edinburgh 1992).

pp. 44-45 - Olmert, one of the priciest lawyers in Israel, was accidentally
discovered to be one of the most unscrupulous also. !n 1987, police investigating
the files of the North American Bank, which was involved in an embezzlement
of at least $37 million, turned up some rather revealing information about Ehud.
It seems Olmert had directed a client to the bank who deposited $1.6 million.
The client, according to Olmert's own explanation, was a criminal fighting extradition
charges and Olmert felt his money would be safe in this obscure bank. And the
bank appeared to be grateful for his patronage. Olmert was rewarded with a $50,000
loan, not a penny of which was ever returned. Naturally, such a classic case
of corruption would be the end of Olmert's career anywhere else. But in Israel
he is considered a candidate for the leadership of the Likud sometime after
the present generation burns out.

pp. 284 - The Likud was smart enough to know that flouting the funding law
too openly would cause a backlash, so it created some straw companies and a
slush fund so that corporations could bypass the legal system...The people in
charge of Likud Party finances at the time were Ehud Olmert and his accountant
Menachem Atzmon.

pp.285-287 - The Likud pulled another rabbit out of its hat. Israeli law prohibits
individual party donations from exceeding $10,000, a sum most Israelis couldn't
amass anyway. The answer to its financial woes could be found in sympathetic
foreigners if a way around the restrictions could be found. The devious minds
of the Likud fundraising team came up with a beauty of a plan. It involved getting
foreign multi-millionaires to guarantee bank loans for the party. Now, let's
say the Likud couldn't repay the loans, well then, the guarantors would have
to pay the tab. And who better to put the plan in action than Ehud Olmert? In
March 1991, Olmert flew to London and Zurich on "ministry business."
The people he met symbolize all the shady and rancid connections between the
Israeli government and money...In London Olmert met with Robert Maxwell and
an American magnate named Alan E. Kasaden. While in Zurich, Olmert met with
Edmond Safra...

Revelations of Olmert's secret life appeared in Haolam Hazeh on June 24, 1991,
and this episode epitomises all the dubious dealings American Jews innocently
support when they donate to the UJA. The Jewish Agency sold a losing real estate
company, Hachsharat Hayishuv to the Nimrodi family, of Iran Contra fame, in
1988. Yaacov Nimrodi purchased the shares from Bank Leumi, which is owned by
the Jewish Agency, which funnels most American charitable donations to Israel.
By the mid-1980s, Agency chairman Arye Dulzin, had a tacit agreement with Leumi
chairman Ernst Yaphet. Yaphet agreed to let Dulzin do what he wanted with Hachsharat
Hayishuv if Dulzin gave Yaphet a free hand at Leumi. Yaphet's hand stole $7.5
million from the bank and ran away to America with it.

Now every crooked deal needs a great lawyer, and who negotiated this theft?
None other than Ehud Olmert. He arranged the sale of Hachsharat Hayishuv, supposedly
owned by the donors of the UJA, to Nimrodi, who dumped the company at great
profit to the Bernard Moss Group in Australia. After mediation, Nimrodi paid
Olmert $400,000 for his role in the scam. Since Olmert was about to be sworn
in as a government minister, he was forbidden to accept the money. So he resigned
from his law firm and we assume the money got to him through other channels.

And these are just samples of Olmert's criminal activities. The same man who
would feloniously arrange the sale of a company owned by charitable donors would
have no moral problem selling his country the same way. If anyone bothered to
actually investigate why Olmert had a political change of heart, they will surely
find that he was given a choice: exposure for massive acts of felony, or take
our bribe.

A few days before this rally, I attended a gathering of the Ariel College in
Tel Aviv. An informed journalist took me aside and said, "Don't quote me.
The last act before withdrawal is being planned. They're preparing to frame
another Goldstein. Watch out for a massacre or an outrage along those lines."

A woman at the rally had just finished a radio interview. She said, "I
was going to tell them there's another Rabin murder in the air. That's how they're
going to remove us from our homes."

I asked why she didn't say so. She answered, "I was afraid if I did, they
would let me talk anymore."