From yet another excellent article on the shameful spectacle of Democrat Socialist scum walking out the room when testimony from our Benghazi heroes’ families was to be heard. It’s all worth reading, but this one in particular bears repeating, re: “why was no rescue attempt launched?” and one of the million lies spewed forth by the Imam-in-Chief Obama’s Junta, which is “it was unpossible!”

Charles Woods, who has given similar testimony, asked a question we also have asked. Noting how he was told of a conversation by Gen. Carter Ham that assets were available to use for a rescue, but that he was not allowed to deploy those assets, Woods wondered: Why not?

As we have reported, Ham, then head of U.S. Africa Command, was relieved of his post after only a year and a half on the job. According to James S. Robbins in the Washington Times, Ham got the same emails about the terrorist attack by the al-Qaida-linked Ansar al-Sharia and immediately began organizing a rescue attempt.

Ham is said to have told the Pentagon he had a rapid response team ready, but was told to stand down. Ham then reportedly said he was going to send help anyway and was promptly relieved of his command.

Emphasis ours.

Yes, you read that right. The commander in the theater had the assets and was going to use them no matter what the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht said. And, in the grand tradition of the Democrat National Socialists’ ideological predecessor, the offending commander was promptly relieved of his command.

And four Americans were murdered as a result while Reichsführer Ogabe went back to sleep, dreaming of his upcoming fundraiser with Jay-Z and perhaps a game of golf or two.

He had an election coming up, after all, so what difference, at that point, did it make if a few Americans got needlessly slaughtered to further his personal ambitions?

The commander in the theater had the assets and was going to use them no matter what the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht said. And, in the grand tradition of the Democrat National Socialists’ ideological predecessor, the offending commander was promptly relieved of his command.

When you’re staging an incident, you can’t have local commanders running about willy-nilly making a mess of carefully laid plans.

Usually the “Constituent Only” e-mail filter can be overcome by simply putting in the zipcode of one of the home state offices of the congressmaledictor..
All they can do is ignore you.
Will they put you on other haters lists?
If you ever contributed to a conservative cause or candidate, Huffington Post has probably put an aerial photo map to your home address on the internet.
And you already are everybody’s list.
Test: “Search” your name and FEC or Federal Elections Commission. I (now proudly) earned my place by donating to swift boaters against kerrytard-traitor
Accept, adapt, press on.

Response to Jon (et al) Also a new point ***
More likely just freezing under stress and usual indecisiveness plus cowardice at anything muslim.
Bubbazipper tried to duck the Paula Jones lawsuit by saying he was as Commander-in-Chief like any active duty service member and thus unsueable in some circumstances. Did not work.
If it had, and had established the POTUS/*TOTUS* as a service member, [***read this DD 214ers and active duty], would there be a place for an UCMJ Art. 99, “abandoning your men or your mission while under fire” court-martial and a possible death penalty?
Another odd thought from the older generation:
How can it be possible that there could be a President that could not qualify to be a combat arms officer because of failing a detailed and routine security check done by the FBI. {M 14 generation here …}