On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:48:23PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
>
> That last sentence doesn't make sense, Robert. If you do get NPTL
> running on NetBSD, you'll have to use the same NetBSD kernel interfaces
> as the native libc does.
I know, but we do the same for the rest of kernel interfaces already.
> In any case, it's obviously far saner to try to port libpthreads from
> the NetBSD libc to glibc than to port NPTL from Linux.
That makes sense. We already borrow code from NetBSD libc for the Glibc port.
--
Robert Millan
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)