ONE
PERSON'S RACIST,
IS ANOTHER PERSON'S FREEDOM FIGHTER
by H. Millard (c) 2001

European-Americans--white people--are used to
being demonized these days as racists and bigots whenever they speak
out truthfully about the increasing attacks on their people and their
culture. Recently, we've seen those who sometimes secretly hate white
people broaden their attacks to include immigration activists. One such
immigration activist group called Numbers U.S.A. has come under fire
for its rolling billboards giving Census Department statistics about
immigration. No kidding. The group has been called racist for displaying
numbers. Racist numbers? Yep. At least according to some of the crackpots
who have been criticizing the outfit. The whole thing would be laughable
except for the fact that these crackpots who so readily fling hate terms
at others, are actually considered, by some, to be serious and responsible
people in our society instead of the nut cases that they so often are.

There is something in human psychology that causes far
too many people to simply believe the name callers instead of using
critical thinking skills to intelligently think through an issue. Maybe
it's a little like the psychology at work where a person who criticizes
food in a restaurant is often thought to be more intelligent than the
people who don't criticize the food. At any rate, when a person calls
another person or group, "racist," the focus of most eyes
and ears seems to go to the person or group that has been called the
name instead of to the person who does the name calling, which is where
the focus should often be.

I was reminded of the way this evil name calling game
(and more) goes, by "Shaman and Freedom-Fighter Led Indians' Mission
Revolt," a column by Cecilia Rasmussen that appeared in the Los
Angeles Times on June 10. Given the fact that this column, as already
mentioned, appeared in the Times, with its fairly well known "anything
and anyone but white people" bias, I wasn't surprised to read that
a racist Indian named Toypurina is gushed over as a freedom fighter.

If you have access to the Times, please read the column
for yourself, but for those who may be reading this without such access,
the story of Toypurina, in its simplest terms, isabout
this Gabrielino Indian woman who helped lead a revolt against the San
Gabriel Mission in the California of the late 1700's. In the column, we
read that after the failed revolt and her capture, Toypurina told the
judges hearing her case that: "I hate the padres and all of you [white
people], for living here on my native soil, for trespassing upon the land
of my forefathers and despoiling our tribal domains...." She also
called the judges and other white people, "white invaders."

Turn the words and situation around a little bit and
you'll see the Times' bias. Suppose Toypurina were a white woman who
recently led a revolt against the present Third World invaders of California--the
illegal aliens--mostly from Mexico. Suppose she had said "I hate
all of you (brown people), for coming here to my native soil, for trespassing
upon the land of my forefathers and despoiling our culture." Suppose
further that she had called brown people, "brown invaders."
What do you suppose the tone of the Times' column would be if all these
suppositions were reality? Let me answer it for you. It is doubtful
that the Times would be running a PR puff piece calling the white woman
a freedom fighter. Instead, we'd probably be treated to a piece about
racism, white supremacy, intolerance, bigotry, (ho, hum). You know it,
and I know it.

But, the Times would probably go even further. After
writing about the hate and bigotry of the white Toypurina, we'd be treated
to a whole series of columns as the different editors and writers at
the Times each wrote about a piece of the story from their perspectives.
Thus, we might see the food section baking up some "Tolerance Cookies."
We might see the editorial writers telling readers that "we're
all people, and we all bleed red blood." We might see the science
writers telling us that people are almost all the same genetically.

And so it goes, dear friends, when the media sets out
to brainwash a population into oblivion. And, many people believe that's
what's happening in California and the rest of this nation right now.
European-Americans are being driven out of this country. But, you may
be saying, "Oh, come on Millard, that's too alarmist, European-Americans
aren't being driven out. There's no massive wave of European-Americans
heading back to Europe."

Ahh, but if you think this, then you're wrong. European-Americans
are being driven out through assimilation and attrition. The European-American
birth rate isn't very high, and there is little
incentive to birth more European-American babies to help on the family
farm or to help support the family, as once was the case. Now, instead
of an incentive to supply needed workers through the internal growth of
this nation by births of European-Americans, the needed workers are being
imported to the country. So, why have babies? "Hey, there are too
many people on the planet, and it would interfere with my life style,"
seems to be the cry from many European-Americans. So, many European-Americans
don't have children or have below replacement levels of children.

Meanwhile, massive waves of illegal aliens are pouring
across our borders to fill the need for entry level workers that aren't
being filled by the internal births. And, when the childless European-Americans
die, their niche often isn't filled by other European-Americans, but by
the children of the illegal aliens. And, as this continues, thecomplexion of America is changing. Even now there are far
fewer whites in proportion to the population than ever before. And, that,
dear friends, is an indication that whites are being driven out and replaced.
However, if you say this, or talk about the genocide of white people through
assimilation and other factors, don't expect the Times to call you a "freedom
fighter." That term is reserved for those who hate white people.

# # #

References: (Note: links may expire)

Sponsors
of ads linked to racist groupsA civil rights group reported on the recent anti-immigrant ads.
Sponsors of advertisements aired in Iowa this year and last criticizing
Mexican immigrants have been linked to racist organizations and writings,
a national civil rights group report states.
The Southern Poverty Law Center
labels as "anti-immigrant" the Federation for American
Immigration Reform, the American Immigration Control Foundation
and Numbers USA, groups that this month sponsored radio and
television ads calling for fewer Mexicans in Iowa.

Shaman
and Freedom-Fighter Led Indians' Mission Revolt(archived
at LA Times) Hidden in the padres' 200-year-old scrawlings at four California
missions are the brief records of a native Californian, a woman depicted
by the Spanish and even by her own people as a seductress, a sorceress
and a witch--but by others as a freedom-fighter.