Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and
post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III or this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer ý

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No ý

The aggregate market value of voting common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 27, 2009 was approximately
$9,230,189,013.

The
number of common shares outstanding as of November 6, 2009 was 474,672,165.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant's proxy statement filed within 120 days of the close of the registrant's fiscal year in connection
with the registrant's 2010 annual general meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

Tyco International Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "we," the "Company" or "Tyco") is a diversified, global company that
provides products and services to customers in various countries throughout the world. Tyco is a leading provider of security products and services, fire protection and detection products and
services, valves and controls and other industrial products. We operate and report financial and operating information in the following five segments:

Flow Control designs, manufactures, sells and services valves, pipes,
fittings, valve automation and heat tracing products for the oil, gas and other energy markets along with general process industries and the water and wastewater markets.

Tyco International Ltd. is a Company organized under the laws of Switzerland. The Company was created as a result of the July
1997 acquisition of Tyco International Ltd., a Massachusetts corporation, by ADT Limited, a public company organized under the laws of Bermuda, at which time ADT Limited changed its name to
Tyco International Ltd. Effective March 17, 2009, following shareholder and Board of Director approval on March 12, 2009, the Company ceased to exist as a Bermuda corporation and
continued its existence as a Swiss corporation under articles 620 et seq. of the Swiss Code of Obligations (the "Change of Domicile"). Effective June 29, 2007, Tyco
International Ltd. completed the spin-offs of Covidien and Tyco Electronics, formerly our Healthcare and Electronics businesses, respectively, into separate, publicly traded
companies (the "Separation") in the form of a distribution to Tyco shareholders. As a result of the Separation, the operations of Tyco's former Healthcare and Electronics businesses have been
classified as discontinued operations in all periods prior to the Separation.

Tyco's
registered and principal office is located at Freier Platz 10, CH-8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland. Its management office in the United States is located at 9 Roszel
Road, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.

Our ADT Worldwide segment designs, sells, installs, services and monitors electronic security systems for residential, commercial,
education, governmental and industrial customers around the world. We are one of the world's largest providers of electronic security systems and services. We have a significant market presence in
North and South America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. With 2009 net revenue of $7.0 billion, our ADT Worldwide segment comprises 41% of our consolidated net revenue. In 2008
and 2007, net revenue totaled $7.7 billion, or 39%, of our consolidated net revenue and $7.3 billion, or 40%, of our consolidated net revenue, respectively.

ADT Worldwide supplies and installs electronic security systems to the residential, commercial, education, governmental and industrial
markets. We also provide electronic security services, including monitoring of burglar alarms, fire alarms and other life safety conditions as well as maintenance of electronic security systems. A
significant portion of the components used in our electronic security systems are manufactured by our Safety Products segment.

Our
electronic security systems business involves the installation and use of security systems designed to detect intrusion, control access and react to movement, fire, smoke, flooding,
environmental conditions, industrial processes and other hazards. These electronic security systems include detection devices that are usually connected to a monitoring center that receives and
records alarm signals and highly skilled security monitoring specialists that verify alarm conditions and initiate a range of response scenarios. For most systems, control panels identify the nature
of the alarm and the areas where a sensor was triggered. Our other solutions include: access control systems for sensitive areas such as offices or banks; video surveillance systems designed to deter
theft and fraud and help protect employees and customers; and asset protection and security management systems designed to monitor and protect physical assets as well as proprietary electronic data.
Our offerings also include

anti-theft
systems utilizing acousto magnetic and radio frequency identification ("RFID") tags and labels in the retail industry. Many of the world's leading retailers use our Sensormatic
® anti-theft systems to help protect against shoplifting and employee theft.

Purchasers
of our intrusion systems typically contract for ongoing security system monitoring and maintenance at the time of initial equipment installation. Systems installed at
customers' premises may be either owned by ADT Worldwide or by our customers. Monitoring center personnel may respond to alarms by relaying appropriate information to local fire or police departments,
notifying the customer or taking other appropriate action. In certain markets, ADT Worldwide directly provides the alarm response services with highly trained and professionally equipped employees. In
some instances, alarm systems are connected directly to local fire or police departments.

Many
of our residential customers may purchase security systems as a result of prompting by their insurance carriers, which may offer lower insurance premium rates if a security system
is installed or require that a system be installed as a condition of coverage.

The electronic security services business is highly competitive and fragmented with a number of major firms and thousands of smaller
regional and local companies. Competition is based primarily on price in relation to quality of service. Rather than compete purely on price, we emphasize the quality of our electronic security
service, the reputation of our brands and our knowledge of our customers' security needs. For large commercial, educational, governmental and industrial customers the comprehensive national and/or
global coverage offered by ADT Worldwide can also provide a competitive advantage. We also have significantly expanded our systems integration capabilities, which allow ADT Worldwide to offer
comprehensive solutions to customers that fully integrate security and fire offerings into comprehensive IT networks, business operations and management tools, and process automation and control
systems.

Our Flow Control segment designs, manufactures, sells and services valves, pipes, fittings, valve automation and heat tracing products
for the oil, gas and other energy markets along with general process industries and the water and wastewater markets. We believe we are the world's leading manufacturer of flow control products. With
2009 net revenue of $3.8 billion, our Flow Control segment comprises 22% of our consolidated net revenue. In 2008 and 2007, net revenue totaled $4.4 billion, or 22%, of our consolidated
net revenue and $3.8 billion, or 20%, of our consolidated net revenue, respectively. Flow Control is a global company with 40% of its sales in Europe, Middle East and Africa ("EMEA"), 26% from
the Americas, 19% from the Pacific region and 15% from Asia.

Flow Control designs and manufactures a wide variety of valves, actuators, controls, pipes, fittings and heat tracing products. Valve
products include a broad range of industrial valves, including on-off valves, safety relief valves and other specialty valves. Actuation products include pneumatic, hydraulic and electric
actuators. Control products include limit switches, solenoid valves, valve positioners, network systems and accessories. For the water market, Flow Control offers a wide variety of pipes, valves,
hydrants, house connections and fittings for water transmission and distribution applications. Flow Control is also a global provider of heat tracing services and products. In addition to these core
products, Flow Control makes a variety of specialty products for environmental (emissions monitoring, water flow and quality monitoring, dust filter cleaning systems), instrumentation (manifolds,
enclosures, isolation valves) and other applications. We manufacture these products in facilities located throughout the world.

Flow
Control products are used in many applications including power generation, chemical, petrochemical, oil and gas, water distribution, wastewater, pulp and paper, commercial
irrigation, mining, food and beverage, plumbing and HVAC. Flow Control also provides engineering, design, inspection, maintenance and repair services for its valves and related products.

Flow
Control products are sold under many trade names, including Anderson Greenwood, Biffi, Crosby, Keystone, KTM, Raychem, Sempell,
Tracer and Vanessa. Flow Control sells its services and products in
most geographic regions directly through its internal sales force and in some cases through a network of independent distributors and manufacturers' representatives.

Flow Control's customers include businesses engaged in a wide range of industries, including power generation, chemical and
petrochemical, pharmaceutical, oil production and refining, gas, water, food and beverage, marine and shipbuilding and related process industries. Customers include end users as well as engineering,
procurement and construction companies, contractors, original equipment manufacturers ("OEM") and distributors. Flow Control operates an extensive network of sales, service and distribution centers to
serve our wide range of global customers.

The flow control industry is highly fragmented, consisting of many local and regional companies and a few global competitors. We
compete against a number of international, national and local manufacturers of industrial valves as well as against specialized manufacturers on the basis of product capability, product quality,
breadth of product line, delivery and price. Our major competitors vary by region.

Fire
Protection Services installs fire detection and fire suppression systems in both new and existing buildings. These systems typically are purchased by owners, construction engineers
and electrical contractors as well as mechanical or general contractors. In recent years, retrofitting of existing buildings has grown as a result of legislation mandating the installation of fire
detection and fire suppression systems, especially in hotels, healthcare facilities and educational establishments. In addition, in September 2008, the International Residential Code Council, a
non-profit association that develops model code documents that are the predominant building and fire safety regulations adopted by jurisdictions in the United States, adopted proposals to
amend the 2009 International Residential Code to require sprinkler systems in new one and two family dwellings effective in January 2011. This national code must now be adopted by each state / fire
district and be incorporated into the local building codes in order to be applied to any new homes being built in that area. The timing of adoption will vary by state / district. Fire Protection
Services also continues to focus on system maintenance and inspection, which have become increasingly significant parts of its business.

Competition in the fire detection and fire suppression business varies by region. In North America, we compete with hundreds of smaller
contractors on a regional or local basis for the installation of fire detection and fire suppression systems. In Europe, we compete with many regional or local contractors on a
country-by-country basis. In Asia, Australia and New Zealand, we compete with a few large fire detection and fire suppression contractors, as well as with many smaller regional
and local companies. We compete for fire detection and fire suppression systems contracts primarily on the basis of service, quality and price.

systems
for trade contractors in the construction and modernization of non-residential structures such as commercial office buildings, institutional facilities, manufacturing plants and
warehouses, shopping centers and multi-family dwellings. In North America, our Allied Tube & Conduit business is a leading manufacturer of electrical steel conduit and our AFC Cable Systems
division is a leading manufacturer of steel and aluminum pre-wired electrical cable. Electrical and Metal Products also manufactures and sells cable tray systems, steel tubes, tiles,
plates and other specialty formed steel products in South America, Asia Pacific and EMEA. With 2009 net revenue of $1.4 billion, our Electrical and Metal Products segment comprises 8% of our
consolidated net revenue. In 2008 and 2007, net revenue totaled $2.3 billion, or 11%, of our consolidated net revenue and $2.0 billion, or 11%, of our consolidated net revenue,
respectively.

The
market prices of key raw materials such as steel and copper have a significant impact on the segment's operating results. In particular, we monitor the difference between what the
Company paid for these raw materials and the selling price charged to customers for the range of value-add products manufactured from these raw materials. As a result, this segment
maintains diligent focus on raw material purchases, manufacturing processes, pricing and sales strategies.

Electrical and Metal Products designs and manufactures galvanized steel tubing and pipe products that include electrical conduit, fire
sprinkler pipe, light gauge steel tube and fence pipe. These steel tube and pipe products are sold under the brand names Allied Tube & Conduit
and Tectron Tube. In addition, we manufacture various electrical support system products including strut channel, metal framing, cable tray systems and
associated fittings, sold under brand names Unistrut, PowerStrut, TJ Cope and Acroba.

Electrical
and Metal Products also design and manufacture pre-wired armored and metal-clad electrical cable, flexible and non-metallic conduit, PVC
and HDPE cable protection products, as well as other fire stop products. These offerings are sold under the brand names AFC Cable Systems, Eastern Wire and
Conduit and Kaf-Tech.

The majority of the products manufactured by Electrical and Metal Products are used by trade contractors in the construction and
modernization of non-residential structures such as commercial office buildings, institutional facilities, manufacturing plants and warehouses, shopping centers and multi-family dwellings.
Nearly 95% of these products are sold through wholesale distribution to trade contractors; the remaining 5% are sold to smaller contractors and homeowners through big-box home improvement
retailers. Distribution-based sales account for 75% of the total revenue for Electrical and Metal Products segment.

The
other major customer segment, representing approximately 25% of revenue, is the OEM market. The steel tubes supplied by Electrical and Metal Products are ultimately used as a
component for OEM products in commercial or industrial end markets. Steel tubular products are sold direct to OEMs or through metals distributors.

The market for electrical conduit and wiring and supports, fire protection and security products and steel tubing includes a broad
range of competitors. Our principal competitors range from national manufacturers to smaller regional players. Our customers purchase from us because of the product availability, breadth of product
line and the premium quality of products.

Safety Products manufactures fire suppression products, including water sprinkler systems, portable fire extinguishers, commercial
suppression systems for special hazards including gas, powder and foam agents, forestry and hose products used to fight wildfires, and fire-fighting foam and related delivery devices.
Safety Products also manufactures life safety products, including self-contained breathing apparatus designed for firefighter, industrial and military use, supplied air respirators,
air-purifying respirators, thermal imaging cameras, gas detection equipment and gas masks. Safety Products' breathing apparatus are used by the military forces of several countries and
many U.S. firefighters rely on the Scott Air-Pak brand of self-contained breathing apparatus.

Safety
Products also manufactures a number of products for ADT Worldwide and Fire Protection Services for incorporation into their electronic security systems and fire detection and fire
suppression systems. These products include a wide range of our fire detection and fire suppression products, security video and access control products, electronic article surveillance and intrusion
products.

In addition to our ADT Worldwide and Fire Protection Services segments, Safety Products sells its products primarily through indirect
distribution channels around the world. These business partners sell to customers including contractors that install fire suppression, security and theft protection systems. Some of our partners are
integrators and install the products themselves; others act as dealers and sell to smaller fire and security contractors. Our end customers for our breathing apparatus include fire departments,
municipal and state governments and military forces as well as major companies in the Industrial sector. Customers for our fire sprinkler products include distributors, commercial builders and
contractors. Residential builders, contractors and developers are emerging customers for our sprinkler products given changing regulatory dynamics. In addition, in September 2008, the International
Residential Code Council, a non-profit association that develops model code documents that are the predominant building and fire safety regulations adopted by jurisdictions in the United
States, adopted proposals to amend the 2009 International Residential Code to require sprinkler systems in new one and two family dwellings effective in January 2011. This national code must now be

adopted
by each state / fire district and be incorporated into the local building codes in order to be applied to any new homes being built in that area. The timing of adoption will vary by state /
district.

Competition for the manufacture and sale of our products is based on specialized product capacity, breadth of product line, price,
training and support and delivery. The principal competitors are specialty products manufacturing companies based in the United States, with other smaller competitors in Europe and Asia.

Patents, trademarks, copyrights and other proprietary rights are important to our business. We also rely upon trade secrets,
manufacturing know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to maintain and improve our competitive position. We review third-party proprietary rights,
including trademarks, patents and patent applications, in an effort to develop an effective intellectual property strategy, avoid infringement of third-party proprietary rights, identify licensing
opportunities and monitor the intellectual property claims of others.

We
own a portfolio of patents that principally relates to: electronic security systems; fire detection systems; fire suppression systems; fire extinguishers and related products;
integrated systems for surveillance and control of public transportation and other public works; fire protection sprinklers and related systems and products; structural and electrical tubing and
conduit; building structural members, panels and related fixtures; concrete reinforcing products; fire-rated and armored electrical cabling; heat tracing and floor heating systems;
security wire and fencing; and flow control products, including valves, actuators and controllers and airflow control and sensing products. We also own a portfolio of trademarks and are a licensee of
various patents and trademarks. Patents for individual products extend for varying periods according to the date of patent filing or grant and the legal term of patents in the various countries where
patent protection is obtained. Trademark rights may potentially extend for longer periods of time and are dependent upon national laws and use of the marks.

While
we consider our patents to be valuable assets, we do not believe that our overall competitive position is dependent on patent protection or that our overall operations are
dependent upon any single patent or group of related patents.

We are engaged in research and development in an effort to introduce new products, to enhance the effectiveness, ease of use, safety
and reliability of our existing products and to expand the applications for which the uses of our products are appropriate. We continually evaluate developing technologies in areas that we believe
will enhance our business for possible investment. Our research and development expense was $118 million in 2009, $127 million in 2008 and $120 million in 2007.

We are a large buyer of metals and other commodities, including gasoline. Certain of the components used in the Fire Protection
Services business, principally certain valves and fittings, are purchased for installation in fire protection systems or for distribution. Materials are purchased from a large number of independent
sources around the world. There have been no shortages in materials that have had a material adverse effect on our businesses. However, significant changes in certain raw material costs have had, and
may in the future have, an adverse impact on costs and operating margins. In particular, our Electrical and Metal Products segment is significantly affected by volatility in the price of steel and
copper, with operating margins generally contracting in a declining price environment and expanding when prices of these commodities are rising. We enter into long-term supply contracts,
using fixed or variable pricing to manage our exposure to potential supply disruptions.

Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local consumer protection, licensing and other laws and regulations, both
within and outside the United States. For example, most U.S. states in which we operate have licensing laws directed specifically toward the alarm and fire suppression industries. Our ADT Worldwide
business currently relies primarily upon the use of wireline telephone service to communicate signals, and wireline telephone companies in the United States are regulated by both the federal and state
governments. Another example is our Flow Control business, which is subject to strict regulations governing the import and export of goods and technologies across international borders, particularly
with respect to "dual use" products, which are products that may have both civil and military use. In addition, government regulation of fire safety codes can impact our Fire Protection Services
business. These and other laws and regulations impact the manner in which we conduct our business, and changes in legislation or government policies can affect our worldwide operations, both
positively and negatively. For a more detailed description of the various laws and regulations that affect our business, see Item 1A. Risk FactorsRisks Related to Legal, Regulatory
and Compliance Matters and Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are subject to numerous foreign, federal, state and local environmental protection and health and safety laws governing, among other
things, the generation, storage, use and transportation of hazardous materials; emissions or discharges of substances into the environment; and the health and safety of our employees.

Certain
environmental laws assess liability on current or previous owners or operators of real property for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at their properties
or at properties at which they have disposed of hazardous substances. In addition to cleanup actions brought by governmental authorities, private parties could bring personal injury or other claims
due to the presence of, or exposure to, hazardous substances or pursuant to indemnifications provided by us in connection with asset disposals. We have received notification from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency and from state environmental agencies that conditions at a number of sites where we and others disposed of hazardous substances require cleanup and other possible
remedial action and may require that we reimburse the government or otherwise pay for the cost of cleanup of those sites and/or for natural resource damages. We have projects underway at a number of
current and former manufacturing facilities to investigate and remediate environmental contamination resulting from past operations.

Given
uncertainties regarding the extent of the required cleanup, the interpretation of applicable laws and regulations and alternative cleanup methods, the ultimate cost of cleanup at
disposal sites and manufacturing facilities is difficult to predict. Based upon our experience, current information regarding

known
contingencies and applicable laws, we concluded that it is probable that we would incur remedial costs in the range of approximately $31 million to $85 million. As of
September 25, 2009, we concluded that the best estimate within this range is approximately $40 million, of which $12 million is included in accrued and other current liabilities
and $28 million is included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In view of our financial position and reserves for environmental matters, we believe that any potential
payment of such estimated amounts will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

As of September 25, 2009, we employed approximately 106,000 people worldwide, of which approximately 38,000 are employed in the
United States and 68,000 are outside the United States. Approximately 31,000 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements or works councils and we believe that our relations with
the labor unions are generally good.

Tyco is required to file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Investors may read
and copy any document that Tyco files, including this Annual Report on Form 10-K, at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC
20549. Investors may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an
Internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file
electronically with the SEC, from which investors can electronically access Tyco's SEC filings.

Our
Internet website is www.tyco.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, reports filed pursuant to Section 16 and any amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the exchange act as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result of the Change of Domicile, Tyco is required to prepare Swiss statutory
financial statements, including Swiss consolidated financial statements, on an annual basis. A copy of the Swiss statutory financial statements will be distributed along with our annual report to
shareholders, and all of the aforementioned reports will be made available to our shareholders upon their request. In addition, we have posted the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation and
Human Resources Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee, as well as our Board Governance Principles and Guide to Ethical Conduct, on our website under the heading "Corporate
CitizenshipGovernance." The annual report to shareholders, charters and principles are not incorporated in this report by reference. We will also provide a copy of these documents free of
charge to shareholders upon request.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described below before investing in our publicly traded securities. The
risks described below are not the only ones facing us. Our business is also subject to the risks that affect many other companies, such as competition, technological obsolescence, labor relations,
general economic conditions, geopolitical events, climate change and international operations. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may impair
our business operations and our liquidity.

Our operating results have been and may in the future be adversely affected by general economic conditions and the cyclical pattern of
certain industries in which we operate. For example, demand for our services and products is significantly affected by the level of commercial construction, the amount of discretionary consumer and
business spending, and the performance of the housing market, each of which historically has displayed significant cyclicality. Recent economic weakness has adversely affected our businesses. For
example, weakness in the North American and European non-residential construction markets have adversely impacted the system installation and service portion of our ADT Worldwide business,
and weak global economic conditions have also adversely impacted our Flow Control business. Continued weakness in the U.S. or global economies, or in the industries in which we operate, could have a
material negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We operate in competitive domestic and international markets and compete with many highly competitive manufacturers and service
providers, both domestically and on a global basis. Our manufacturing businesses face competition from lower cost manufacturers in Asia and elsewhere and our service businesses face competition from
alternative service providers around the world. Key components of our competitive position are our ability to adapt to changing competitive environments and to manage expenses successfully. This
requires continuous management focus on reducing costs, maintaining our competitive position and improving efficiency through cost controls, productivity enhancements and regular appraisal of our
asset portfolio. If we are unable to achieve appropriate levels of scalability or cost-effectiveness, or if we are otherwise unable to manage and react to changes in the global
marketplace, our operating results may be adversely affected.

Our businesses operate in global markets that are characterized by rapidly changing technologies and evolving industry standards.
Accordingly, our future growth rate depends upon a number of factors, including our ability to: identify emerging technological trends in our target end-markets; develop, acquire and
maintain competitive products and services; enhance
our products and services by adding innovative features that differentiate our products and services from those of our competitors; and develop or acquire, manufacture and bring products and services
to market quickly and cost-effectively. Our ability to develop or acquire new products and services based on technological innovation can affect our competitive position and requires the
investment of significant resources. These acquisitions and development efforts divert resources from other potential investments in our businesses, and they may not lead to the development of new
technologies, products or services on a timely basis or that meet the needs of our customers as fully as competitive offerings. In addition, the markets for our products and services may not develop
or grow as we anticipate. As a result, the failure of our technology, products or services to gain market acceptance or their obsolescence could significantly reduce our revenues, increase our
operating costs or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Attrition rates for customers in our ADT Worldwide business increased over the prior year to an average of 13.4% on a trailing
12-month basis for 2009, as compared to 12.9% for 2008, and 12.3% in 2007. Although rates have not increased significantly in the last fiscal year, if attrition rates continue to trend
upward, ADT's recurring revenue and results of operations may be adversely affected. The risk is more pronounced in times of economic uncertainty. Tyco amortizes the costs of ADT's contracts and
related customer relationships purchased through the ADT dealer program based on the estimated life of the customer relationships. Internally generated residential and commercial pools are similarly
depreciated. If attrition rates were to rise, Tyco may be required to accelerate the depreciation and amortization of subscriber system assets and intangible assets, which could cause a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

We have significant operations outside of the United States. We generated 52% of our net revenue outside of the United States in 2009.
We expect net revenue generated outside of the United States to continue to represent a significant portion of total net revenue. Business
operations outside of the United States are subject to political, economic and other risks inherent in operating in certain countries, such as:

We are exposed to a variety of market risks, including the effects of changes in currency exchange rates, commodity prices and interest
rates. See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Our
net revenue derived from sales in non-U.S. markets for 2009 was 52% of our total net revenue, and we expect revenue from non-U.S. markets to continue to
represent a significant portion of our total net revenue. Therefore, when the U.S. dollar strengthens in relation to the currencies of the foreign countries where we sell our products and services
compared to prior periods, our U.S. dollar reported revenue and income will decrease, and vice-versa. Changes in the relative values of currencies occur regularly and in some instances,
may have a significant effect on our results of operations. Our financial statements reflect translation of items denominated in non-U.S. currencies to U.S. dollars, our functional
currency.

In
addition, we are a large buyer of metals and other commodities, including fossil fuels for our manufacturing operations and our vehicle fleet, the prices of which have fluctuated
significantly in recent years. Increases in the prices of some of these commodities could increase the costs of manufacturing our products and providing our services. We may not be able to pass on
these costs to our customers or otherwise effectively manage price volatility and this could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Further, in
a declining price
environment, our operating margins may contract because we account for inventory using the first-in, first-out method. This is most pronounced in our Electrical and Metal
Products segment, where declining copper and steel prices, along with volume declines, negatively affected our margins in 2009.

We
monitor these exposures as an integral part of our overall risk management program. In some cases, we enter into hedge contracts to insulate our results of operations from these
fluctuations. These hedges are subject to the risk that our counterparty may not perform. As a result, changes in currency exchange rates, commodity prices and interest rates may have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We continue to evaluate the performance of all of our businesses and may sell businesses or product lines. Any divestiture could result
in significant asset impairment charges, including those related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations. Divestitures could involve additional risks, including difficulties in the separation of operations, services, products and personnel, the diversion of management's attention from other
business concerns, the disruption of our business, the potential loss of key employees and the retention of uncertain environmental or other contingent liabilities related to the divested business. We
cannot assure you that we will be successful in managing these or any other significant risks that we encounter in divesting a business or product line.

assumption of the liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies.

It
may be difficult for us to complete transactions quickly and to integrate acquired operations efficiently into our current business operations. Any acquisitions or investments may
ultimately harm our business or financial condition, as such acquisitions may not be successful and may ultimately result in impairment charges.

We purchase materials, components and equipment from third-parties for use in our manufacturing operations. If we cannot obtain
sufficient quantities of these items at competitive prices and quality and on a timely basis, we may not be able to produce sufficient quantities of product to satisfy market demand, product shipments
may be delayed or our material or
manufacturing costs may increase. In addition, because we cannot always immediately adapt our cost structures to changing market conditions, our manufacturing capacity may at times exceed or fall
short of our production requirements. Any of these problems could result in the loss of customers, provide an opportunity for competing products to gain market acceptance and otherwise adversely
affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company's culture and guiding principles focus on continuously training, motivating and developing employees, and in particular it
strives to attract, motivate and retain qualified managers to handle the day-to-day operations of a highly diversified organization. If we fail to retain and attract qualified
personnel, the Company's operations could be adversely affected. In addition, excessive turnover in personnel could cause manufacturing inefficiencies in certain of our businesses. The demand for
experienced management in certain geographic areas also makes it difficult to retain qualified employees. High turnover could result in additional training and inefficiencies that could adversely
impact the Company's operating results.

Pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to periodically assess our goodwill,
intangibles and other long-lived assets to determine if they are impaired. Disruptions to our business, end market conditions and protracted economic weakness, unexpected significant
declines in operating results of reporting units, divestitures and market capitalization declines may result in additional charges for goodwill and other asset impairments. During the quarter ended
March 27, 2009, we recognized aggregate goodwill and intangible asset impairments of $2.7 billion, resulting primarily from a slowdown in the commercial markets including the retailer
end market in certain of our businesses; a decline in sales volume at our Electrical and Metal Products segment; and downward revisions to forecasted results, restructuring actions and weaker industry
outlooks. As a result, the Company recognized an aggregate goodwill impairment of $2.6 billion ($2.6 billion after-tax) at six of our reporting units and intangible asset
impairments of $64 million ($40 million after-tax) related to franchise rights in our ADT Worldwide segment and a tradename in our Safety Products segment. The Company
believes that our goodwill balance as of September 25, 2009 is recoverable. However, fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to change. Additional impairments
to one or more of our reporting units could occur in future periods whether or not connected to the annual impairment analysis. Future impairment

charges
could materially affect our reported earnings in the periods of such charges and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Legal, Regulatory and Compliance Matters

We are named as a defendant in a variety of litigation that could cause a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are named as a defendant in a significant amount of litigation, including claims for damages arising out of the use or installation
of our products or services, litigation alleging the infringement of intellectual property rights, litigation alleging anti-competitive behavior, litigation related to environmental
matters, product liability
litigation (including asbestos-related claims), litigation alleging violations of federal and state securities laws, employee matters and commercial disputes. In certain circumstances, patent
infringement and anti-trust laws permit successful plaintiffs to recover treble damages. The defense of these lawsuits may divert our management's attention, and we may incur significant
expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay damage awards or settlements, or become subject to injunctions or other equitable remedies, that could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Moreover, any insurance or indemnification rights that we have may be insufficient or unavailable to protect us against
potential loss exposures.

Legislative action could be taken by the U.S. Congress which, if ultimately enacted, could override tax treaties upon which we rely,
which would adversely affect our effective corporate tax rate despite our Change of Domicile. We cannot predict the outcome of any specific legislative proposals. However, if proposals were enacted
that had the effect of disregarding our March 2009 Change of Domicile from Bermuda to Switzerland or limiting our ability as a Swiss company to take advantage of the tax treaties between Switzerland
and the United States, we could be subjected to increased taxation. Also, various U.S. federal and state legislative proposals have been introduced in recent years that deny, or would deny, government
contracts to U.S. companies that move their locations abroad. We cannot assure you that moving our jurisdiction of incorporation to Switzerland has eliminated the risk that these contract bans will
apply to us.

In
addition, there continues to be negative publicity regarding, and criticism of, companies that conduct substantial business in the U.S. but are domiciled abroad. We cannot assure you
that we will not be subject to such criticism as a result of our domicile in Switzerland.

We operate in regulated industries. Our U.S. operations are subject to regulation by a number of federal, state and local governmental
agencies with respect to safety of operations and equipment, labor and employment matters and financial responsibility. Intrastate operations in the United States are subject to regulation by state
regulatory authorities, and our international operations are regulated by the countries in which they operate and by extra-territorial laws. We and our employees are subject to various U.S. federal,
state and local laws and regulations, as well as non-U.S. laws and regulations, including many related to consumer protection. Most states in which we operate have licensing laws covering
the monitored security services industry and the construction industry. Our ADT Worldwide business relies heavily upon wireline telephone service to communicate signals, and wireline telephone
companies are regulated by both the federal and state governments. Changes in laws or regulations could require us to change the way we operate, which could increase costs or otherwise disrupt

operations.
In addition, failure to comply with any applicable laws or regulations could result in substantial fines or revocation of our operating permits and licenses. If laws and regulations
changed or we failed to comply, our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA") and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit
companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in FCPA
enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"),
increased enforcement activity by non-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these
anti-bribery laws. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental and commercial corruption to some degree and in certain circumstances, strict compliance with
anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures always will protect us from reckless or criminal
acts committed by our employees or agents. Furthermore, we have been subject to investigations by the DOJ and the SEC related to allegations that improper payments have been made by our subsidiaries
and agents in recent years in violation of the FCPA. We have reported to the DOJ and the SEC the remedial measures that we have taken in response to the allegations and our own internal
investigations. We also retained outside counsel to perform a Company-wide baseline review of our policies, controls and practices with respect to the FCPA, and we periodically provide
updates to the SEC and DOJ regarding our FCPA investigations and compliance activities. As a result, it is possible that we will be required to pay material fines, consent to injunctions on future
conduct or suffer other civil or criminal penalties or adverse impacts, including being subject to securities litigation or a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely
affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, business prospects or the market value of our stock.

Our global operations require importing and exporting goods and technology across international borders on a regular basis. From time
to time, we obtain or receive information alleging improper activity in connection with imports or exports. Our policy mandates strict compliance with U.S. and international trade laws. When we
receive information alleging improper activity, our policy is to investigate that information and respond appropriately, including, if warranted, reporting our findings to relevant governmental
authorities. Nonetheless, we cannot provide assurance that our policies and procedures will always protect us from actions that would violate U.S. and/or foreign laws. Such improper actions could
subject the Company to civil or criminal penalties, including material monetary fines, or other adverse actions including denial of import or export privileges, and could damage our reputation and our
business prospects.

Under the Separation and Distribution Agreement and other agreements, subject to certain exceptions contained in the Tax Sharing
Agreement, we, Covidien and Tyco Electronics have agreed to assume and be responsible for 27%, 42% and 31%, respectively, of certain of our contingent and other corporate liabilities. All costs and
expenses associated with the management of these contingent and other corporate liabilities will be shared equally among the parties. These contingent and other corporate liabilities primarily relate
to legacy securities litigation and any actions with respect to the separation plan or the Separation brought by any third party, as well as pre-Separation income tax liabilities. Liabilities that are
specifically related to one of the three separated companies are not allocated.

If any party responsible for such liabilities were to default in its payment, when due, of any of these assumed obligations, each non-defaulting party
would be required to pay equally with any other non-defaulting party the amounts in default. Accordingly, under certain circumstances, we may be obligated to pay amounts in excess of our
agreed-upon share of the assumed obligations related to such contingent and other corporate liabilities including associated costs and expenses.

We could face product liability and asbestos claims relating to products we manufacture or install. These claims could result in significant costs and liabilities and reduce
our profitability.

We face exposure to product liability claims in the event that any of our products results in personal injury or property damage. In
addition, if any of our products prove to be defective, we may be required to recall or redesign such products, which could result in significant unexpected costs. We have been named in a significant
number of lawsuits alleging damages based on claims that individuals were exposed to asbestos through the past distribution of asbestos-containing industrial products. Any insurance we maintain may
not be available on terms acceptable to us or such coverage may not be adequate for liabilities actually incurred. Any claim or product recall could result in adverse publicity against us, which could
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In
addition, we could face liability for failure to respond adequately to alarm activations or failure of our fire protection systems to operate as expected. The nature of the services
we provide potentially exposes us to risks of liability for employee acts or omissions or system failures. In an attempt to reduce this risk, our alarm monitoring agreements and other contracts
contain provisions limiting our liability in such circumstances. We cannot assure you, however, that these limitations will be enforced. Losses from such litigation could be material to our financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are subject to numerous foreign, federal, state and local environmental protection and health and safety laws governing, among other
things:



the generation, storage, use and transportation of hazardous materials;



emissions or discharges of substances into the environment; and



the health and safety of our employees.

We
cannot assure you that we have been or will be at all times in compliance with environmental and health and safety laws. If we violate these laws, we could be fined, criminally charged or otherwise
sanctioned by regulators.

Certain
environmental laws assess liability on current or previous owners or operators of real property for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous substances at their properties
or at properties at which they have disposed of hazardous substances. In addition to cleanup actions brought by governmental authorities, private parties could bring personal injury or other claims
due to the presence of, or exposure to, hazardous substances.

We
have received notification from the United States Environmental Protection Agency and from state environmental agencies, that conditions at a number of sites where we and others
disposed of hazardous substances require cleanup and other possible remedial action and may require that we reimburse the government or otherwise pay for the cost of cleanup of those sites and/or for
natural resource damages. We have projects underway at a number of current and former manufacturing facilities to investigate and remediate environmental contamination resulting from past operations.
These projects relate to a variety of activities, including:



solvent, metal and other hazardous substance contamination cleanup; and

These
projects involve both remediation expenses and capital improvements. In addition, we remain responsible for certain environmental issues at manufacturing locations previously sold by us.

The
ultimate cost of cleanup at disposal sites and manufacturing facilities is difficult to predict given uncertainties regarding the extent of the required cleanup, the interpretation
of applicable laws and regulations and alternative cleanup methods. Based upon our experience, current information regarding known contingencies and applicable laws, we concluded that it is probable
that we would incur remedial costs of approximately $40 million, of which $12 million is included in accrued and other current liabilities and $28 million is included in other
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 25, 2009. Environmental laws are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. While we have
budgeted for future capital and operating expenditures to maintain compliance with such laws, we cannot provide assurance that our costs of complying with current or future environmental protection
and health and safety laws, or our liabilities arising from past or future releases of, or exposures to, hazardous substances will not exceed our estimates or materially adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. We may also be subject to material liabilities for additional environmental claims for personal injury or cleanup in the future based on our past,
present or future business activities or for existing environmental conditions of which we are not presently aware.

In the normal course of our business, we access credit markets for general corporate purposes, which may include repayment of
indebtedness, acquisitions, additions to working capital, repurchase of common shares, capital expenditures and investments in the Company's subsidiaries. Although we believe we have sufficient
liquidity to meet our current needs, our access to and the cost of capital could be negatively impacted by disruptions in the credit markets. In 2009, global credit markets experienced significant
dislocations and liquidity disruptions, and continued uncertainty in the credit markets may make financing terms for borrowers unattractive or unavailable. These factors may make it more difficult or
expensive for us to access credit markets to meet our needs. In addition, these factors may make it more difficult for our suppliers to meet demand for their products or for prospective customers to
commence new projects, as customers and suppliers may experience increased costs of debt financing or difficulties in obtaining debt financing. These disruptions in the financial markets have had
adverse effects on other areas of the economy and have led to a slow down in general economic activity that we expect to continue to adversely affect our businesses. These disruptions may have other
unknown adverse affects. Based on these conditions, our profitability and our ability to execute our business strategy may be adversely affected.

Our bank credit agreements contain financial covenants, including a limit on the ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization and limits on incurrence of liens and subsidiary debt. Our indentures contain customary covenants including limits on negative pledges, subsidiary debt and
sale/leaseback transactions.

Although
we believe none of these covenants are restrictive to our operations, our ability to meet the financial covenants can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot
provide assurance that we will meet those tests. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under our credit agreements or indentures. Upon the occurrence of an event of default
under any of our credit facilities or indentures, the lenders or trustees could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to
extend further credit.

If
the lenders or trustees accelerate the repayment of borrowings, we cannot provide assurance that we will have sufficient assets to repay our credit facilities and our other indebtedness.
Furthermore, acceleration of any obligation under any of our material debt instruments will permit the holders of our other material debt to accelerate their obligations, which could have a material
adverse affect on our financial condition. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

We estimate that our available cash, our cash flow from operations and amounts available to us under our revolving lines of credit will
be adequate to fund our operations and service our debt for the foreseeable future. However, material adverse legal judgments, fines, penalties or settlements arising from our pending investigations
and litigation could require additional funding. If such developments require us to obtain additional funding, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to obtain the additional funding that we
need on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Such
an outcome could have important consequences to you. For example, it could:



require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development efforts and other general corporate purposes, including debt reduction or dividend
payments;

The Company and its subsidiaries' income tax returns periodically are examined by various tax authorities. In connection with these
examinations, tax authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), have raised issues and proposed tax adjustments. We are reviewing and contesting certain of the proposed tax adjustments.
Amounts related to these tax adjustments and other tax contingencies and related interest that management has assessed for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded through the income tax
provision, equity or goodwill, as appropriate. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions
across our global operations. We recognize potential liabilities and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of
whether, and the extent to which, additional income taxes will be due. These tax liabilities are reflected net of related tax loss carryforwards. We adjust these liabilities in light of changing facts
and circumstances.

In
2004, in connection with the IRS audit of the 1997 through 2000 years, the Company submitted to the IRS proposed adjustments to certain prior period U.S. federal income tax
returns resulting in a reduction in the taxable income previously filed. During 2006, the IRS accepted substantially all of the

proposed
adjustments. Subsequently, the Company developed proposed amendments to U.S. federal income tax returns for additional periods through 2006. On the basis of previously accepted amendments,
the Company has determined that these adjustments will more-likely-than-not be accepted and, accordingly, has recorded such adjustments in the Consolidated
Financial Statements. Such adjustments did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. While the final adjustments cannot be determined until
the IRS review is completed, the Company believes that any resulting adjustments will not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Under the Tax Sharing Agreement, we share responsibility for certain of our, Covidien's and Tyco Electronics' income tax liabilities,
which result in cash payments, based on a sharing formula for periods prior to and including June 29, 2007. More specifically, we, Covidien and Tyco Electronics share 27%, 42% and 31%,
respectively, of U.S. income tax liabilities that arise from adjustments made by tax authorities to our, Covidien's and Tyco Electronics' U.S. and certain non-U.S. income tax returns, certain income
tax liabilities arising from adjustments made by tax authorities to intercompany transactions or similar adjustments, and certain taxes attributable to internal transactions undertaken in anticipation
of the Separation. All costs and expenses associated with the management of these shared tax liabilities will be shared equally among the parties. We are responsible for all of our own taxes that are
not shared pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement's sharing formula. In addition, Covidien and Tyco Electronics are responsible for their tax liabilities that are not subject to the Tax Sharing
Agreement's sharing formula.

If
any party to the Tax Sharing Agreement were to default in its obligation to another party to pay its share of the distribution taxes that arise as a result of no party's fault, each
non-defaulting party would be required to pay, equally with any other non-defaulting party, the amounts in default. In addition, if another party to the Tax Sharing Agreement
that is responsible for all or a portion of an income tax liability were to default in its payment of such liability to a taxing authority, we could be legally liable under applicable tax law for such
liabilities and required to make additional tax payments. Accordingly, under certain circumstances, we may be obligated to pay amounts in excess of our agreed-upon share of our, Covidien's
and Tyco Electronics' tax liabilities.

We have received private letter rulings from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution of Covidien
and Tyco Electronics common shares to our shareholders substantially to the effect that the distribution of such shares, except for cash received in lieu of fractional shares, will qualify as
tax-free under Sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). The private letter rulings also provided that certain internal transactions
undertaken in anticipation of the Separation would qualify for favorable treatment under the Code. The private letter rulings relied on certain facts and assumptions, and certain representations and
undertakings, from Tyco, Covidien and Tyco Electronics regarding the past and future conduct of our respective businesses and other matters. Notwithstanding the private letter rulings and the
opinions, the IRS could determine on audit that the distribution or the internal transactions should be treated as taxable transactions if it determines that any of these facts, assumptions,
representations or undertakings are not correct or have been violated, or that the distributions should be taxable for other reasons, including as a result of significant changes in stock or asset
ownership after the distribution. If the distribution ultimately is determined to be taxable, we would recognize a gain in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Covidien and
Tyco Electronics common shares distributed

to
our shareholders on June 29, 2007 over our tax basis in such common shares, but such gain, if recognized, generally would not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. However, we would incur
significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities if it ultimately is determined that certain internal transactions undertaken in connection with the Separation should be treated as taxable
transactions.

Tyco International has changed its place of incorporation from Bermuda to Switzerland. Because of differences between Swiss law and
Bermuda law and differences between the governing documents of Swiss and Bermuda companies, it may not be possible to enforce court judgments obtained in the United States against Tyco International
based on the civil liability provisions of the federal or state securities laws of the United States in Switzerland. As a result, in a lawsuit based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S.
federal or state securities laws, U.S. investors may find it difficult to:



effect service within the United States upon Tyco or its directors and officers located outside the United States;



enforce judgments obtained against those persons in U.S. courts or in courts in jurisdictions outside the United States;
and



enforce against those persons in Switzerland, whether in original actions or in actions for the enforcement of judgments
of U.S. courts, civil liabilities based solely upon the U.S. federal or state securities laws.

Switzerland
and the United States do not have a treaty providing for reciprocal recognition of and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The recognition and
enforcement of a judgment of the courts of the United States in Switzerland is governed by the principles set forth in the Swiss Federal Act on Private International Law. This statute provides in
principle that a judgment rendered by a non-Swiss court may be enforced in Switzerland only if:



the foreign court had jurisdiction pursuant to the Swiss Federal Act on Private International Law;



the judgment of such foreign court has become final and non-appealable;



the judgment does not contravene Swiss public policy;



the court procedures and the service of documents leading to the judgment were in accordance with the due process of law;
and



no proceeding involving the same position and the same subject matter was first brought in Switzerland, or adjudicated in
Switzerland, or that it was earlier adjudicated in a third state and this decision is recognizable in Switzerland.

Until January 1, 2011, Tyco must declare and pay dividends in the form of reductions of registered share capital, which must be stated in Swiss francs, to avoid
adverse tax consequences. Any currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and Swiss francs will affect the dollar value of the dividends Tyco pays.

Under Swiss law, payments that are made to shareholders in the form of a return of registered share capital do not require the payment
of withholding taxes to Swiss authorities, while ordinary dividend payments require that such taxes be withheld. Swiss corporate law requires that any payments made to shareholders in the form of a
return of capital must be denominated in Swiss francs. After January 1, 2011, dividend payments may be made out of contributed surplus without having to pay withholding taxes, and these
payments can be denominated and paid in U.S. dollars. Therefore, until

January 1,
2011, we expect to pay dividends in the form of a return of registered share capital, and these dividends will be denominated in Swiss francs. We expect our transfer agent to make
these dividend payments in U.S. dollars converted at the U.S. dollar to Swiss franc exchange rate shortly before the payment date. As a result, shareholders will be exposed to fluctuations in the
value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Swiss franc between the date used for purposes of calculating the Swiss franc amount of any proposed capital reduction (which will typically be on or about the
date of our annual general meeting) and the relevant payment date, which will not be shorter than two months and could be as long as a year.

As a result of our Change of Domicile and the increase in the par value of our shares, we may have less flexibility with respect to certain aspects of capital management.

In connection with the Change of Domicile, we significantly increased the par value of our shares. Currently the par value of our
shares is CHF 8.07 (or approximately $7.87 based on the exchange rate in effect on November 2, 2009). Under Swiss law, we generally may not issue registered shares for an amount below
par value. As of November 2, 2009, the closing price of our ordinary shares on the NYSE was $33.53. In the event there is a need to raise common equity capital at a time when the trading price
of our registered shares is below our par value, we would need to obtain approval of our shareholders to decrease the par value of our registered shares. We cannot assure you that we would be able to
obtain such shareholder approval. Obtaining shareholder approval also would require filing a preliminary proxy statement with the SEC and convening a meeting of shareholders which would delay any
capital raising plans. If we were to receive shareholder approval to reduce the par value of our registered shares, the reduction would decrease our ability to pay dividends as a repayment of share
capital, which may subject you to Swiss withholding tax.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our operations are conducted in facilities throughout the world aggregating approximately 34 million square feet of floor space,
of which approximately 14 million square feet are owned and approximately 20 million square feet are leased. These facilities house manufacturing, distribution and warehousing
operations, as well as sales and marketing, engineering and administrative offices.

ADT
Worldwide operates through a network of offices and service facilities located in North America, Central America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, the Asia-Pacific
region and
South Africa. The group occupies approximately 6 million square feet, of which 1 million square feet are owned and 5 million square feet are leased.

Flow
Control has manufacturing facilities, warehouses and distribution centers throughout North America, South America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The group occupies
approximately 11 million square feet, of which 6 million square feet are owned and 5 million square feet are leased.

Fire
Protection Services operates through a network of offices located in North America, Central America, South America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The group
occupies approximately 5 million square feet, all of which are leased.

Electrical
and Metal Products has manufacturing facilities, warehouses and distribution centers throughout North America, South America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
The group occupies approximately 6 million square feet, of which 4 million square feet are owned and 2 million square feet are leased.

Safety
Products operates through a network of offices located in North America, South America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Our Safety Products manufacturing
facilities, warehouses and

distribution
centers are located in North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The group occupies approximately 6 million square feet, of which 3 million square feet
are owned and 3 million square feet are leased.

In
the opinion of management, our properties and equipment are in good operating condition and are adequate for our present needs. We do not anticipate difficulty in renewing existing
leases as they expire or in finding alternative facilities. See Note 15 to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our lease obligations.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, including product and general liability
matters, environmental matters, patent infringement claims, employment disputes, disputes on agreements and other commercial disputes.

In
connection with the Separation, we entered into a liability sharing agreement regarding certain legal actions that were pending against Tyco prior to the Separation. Under the
Separation and Distribution Agreement, we, Covidien and Tyco Electronics are jointly and severally liable for the full amount of any judgments resulting from the actions subject to the agreement,
which generally relate to legacy matters that are not specific to the business operations of any of the companies. The Separation and Distribution Agreement also provides that we will be responsible
for 27%, Covidien 42% and Tyco Electronics 31% of payments to resolve these matters, with costs and expenses associated with the management of these contingencies being shared equally among the
parties. In addition, under the agreement, we will manage and control all the legal matters related to assumed contingent liabilities as described in the Separation and Distribution Agreement,
including the defense or settlement thereof, subject to certain limitations. Additionally, at the time of the Separation, the Company, Covidien and Tyco Electronics agreed to allocate responsibility
for certain legacy tax claims pursuant to the same formula under the Tax Sharing Agreement. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our Tax Sharing Agreement.

As previously reported, Tyco, and some members of the Company's former senior corporate management were named as defendants in a number
of lawsuits alleging violations of the disclosure provisions of the federal securities laws.

In
June 2007 the Company settled 32 purported securities class action lawsuits arising from actions alleged to have been taken by prior management for $2.975 billion. Of this
amount, the Company contributed $803 million, representing its share under the Separation and Distribution Agreement.

The
June 2007 class action settlement did not purport to resolve all legacy securities cases, and several remain outstanding, the most significant of which is Stumpf v. Tyco International Ltd., which
is a class action lawsuit in which the plaintiffs allege that Tyco, among others, violated the
disclosure provisions of the federal securities laws. The matter arises from Tyco's July 2000 initial public offering of common stock of TyCom Inc., and alleges that the TyCom registration statement
and prospectus relating to the sale of common stock were inaccurate, misleading and failed to disclose facts necessary to make the registration statement and prospectus not misleading. The complaint
further alleges the defendants violated securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning, among other things, executive compensation, TyCom's business
prospects and Tyco's and TyCom's finances. The matter is currently in the pre-trial stages of litigation.

In
the first half of fiscal 2009, the Company settled a number of legal matters stemming from alleged violations of federal securities laws committed by former senior management,
including several lawsuits from plaintiffs that had opted out of the June 2007 class action settlement, for an aggregate amount of approximately $90 million. Pursuant to the Separation and
Distribution Agreement, the

Company's
share of this amount was approximately $24 million, with Covidien and Tyco Electronics responsible for approximately $38 million and $28 million, respectively.

During
the second quarter of 2009, the Company concluded that its best estimate of probable loss for the legacy securities matters outstanding at the time was $375 million in the
aggregate, which the Company recorded as a liability in accrued and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 27, 2009. Due to the sharing provisions in the
Separation and Distribution Agreement described above, the Company also recorded receivables from Covidien and Tyco Electronics in the amounts of $158 million and $116 million,
respectively, which were recorded in other current assets in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 27, 2009. As a result, the Company recorded a net charge of $101 million
related to legacy securities matters during the quarter ended March 27, 2009 in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In
the second half of fiscal 2009, the Company agreed to settle with all of the remaining plaintiffs that had opted-out of the class action settlement as well as plaintiffs
who had brought Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") related claims for a total of $271 million. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Company's share of the
settlement amount was approximately $73 million, with Covidien and Tyco Electronics responsible for approximately $114 million and $84 million, respectively. This settlement
activity did not result in the Company recording a charge to its Consolidated Statements of Operations as the Company had established a reserve for its best estimate of the amount of loss during the
second quarter of 2009 as discussed above.

The
Company continues to believe that the accrual remaining as of September 25, 2009 is its best estimate for the remaining unresolved claims. Although the Company has reserved
its best estimate of probable loss related to unresolved legacy securities claims, their ultimate resolution could differ from this estimate and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
addition to the Stumpf matter, Tyco is a party to several lawsuits based on alleged violations of federal securities laws, fraud and
negligence committed by former management. These previously reported matters consist of Jasin v. Tyco International Ltd., et al., an action
brought by a pro se plaintiff, Hall v. Kozlowski, et al, an action brought by a pro se plaintiff relating to the plaintiff's employment, 401(k), pension
plans and ownership of Tyco common stock, and several affirmative actions brought by Tyco against Messrs. Kozlowski, Swartz and Walsh, former executives and a director of Tyco. In connection
with our affirmative actions, Messrs. Kozlowski and Swartz have made counterclaims seeking
amounts allegedly due in connection with the former executives' compensation and retention arrangements and under ERISA, and Mr. Walsh has made claims alleging that Tyco is required to
indemnify him for his defense costs arising from his role as a Tyco director. Tyco intends to vigorously defend each of these actions and does not believe that the ultimate outcome of any of these
matters will have a material adverse affect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Under
the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, each of Tyco, Covidien and Tyco Electronics are jointly and severally liable for the full amount of any legacy securities
matters (excluding the counter-claims brought by former executives and a director described above.)

Tyco is involved in various stages of investigation and cleanup related to known environmental remediation matters at a number of
sites. The ultimate cost of site cleanup is difficult to predict given the uncertainties regarding the extent of the required cleanup, the interpretation of applicable laws and regulations and
alternative cleanup methods. As of September 25, 2009, Tyco concluded that it was probable that it would incur remedial costs in the range of approximately $31 million to
$85 million. As of September 25, 2009, Tyco concluded that the best estimate within this range is approximately

$40 million,
of which $12 million is included in accrued and other current liabilities and $28 million is included in other liabilities in Tyco's Consolidated Balance Sheet. In
view of the Company's financial position and reserves for environmental matters, the Company believes that any potential payment of such estimated amounts will not have a material adverse effect on
its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are named as defendants in bodily injury lawsuits based on alleged exposure to
asbestos-containing materials. These cases typically involve product liability claims based primarily on allegations of manufacture, sale or distribution of industrial products that either contained
asbestos or were attached to or used with asbestos-containing components manufactured by third-parties. Each case typically names between dozens to hundreds of corporate defendants. While the Company
has observed an increase in the number of these lawsuits over the past several years, including lawsuits by plaintiffs with mesothelioma-related claims, a large percentage of these suits have not
presented viable legal claims and, as a result, have been dismissed by
the courts. The Company's strategy has been, and continues to be, to mount a vigorous defense aimed at having unsubstantiated suits dismissed, and, where appropriate, settling suits before trial.
Although a large percentage of litigated suits have been dismissed, the Company cannot predict the extent to which it will be successful in resolving lawsuits in the future. Of the lawsuits that have
proceeded to trial since 2005, the Company has won or settled all but one case, with that one case returning an adverse jury verdict for approximately $7.7 million, which included both
compensatory and punitive damages. The Company has appealed the verdict and believes that it will ultimately be overturned. As of September 25, 2009, there were 4,200 lawsuits pending against
the Company and its subsidiaries. Each lawsuit typically includes several claims, and the Company has determined that it had 5,509, 6,569 and 6,461 claims outstanding as of September 25, 2009,
September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively. These amounts reflect adjustments for claims that are not actively being prosecuted, identify incorrect defendants or are
duplicative of other actions. For a detailed discussion of asbestos-related matters, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company and its subsidiaries' income tax returns periodically are examined by various tax authorities. In connection with these
examinations, tax authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), have raised issues and proposed tax adjustments. We are reviewing and contesting certain of the proposed tax adjustments.
Amounts related to these tax adjustments and other tax contingencies and related interest that management has assessed for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded through the income tax
provision, equity or goodwill, as appropriate. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions
across our global operations. We recognize potential liabilities and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of
whether, and the extent to which, additional income taxes will be due. These tax liabilities are reflected net of related tax loss carryforwards. We adjust these liabilities in light of changing facts
and circumstances.

In
2004, in connection with the IRS audit of the 1997 through 2000 years, the Company submitted to the IRS proposed adjustments to certain prior period U.S. federal income tax
returns resulting in a reduction in the taxable income previously filed. During 2006, the IRS accepted substantially all of the proposed adjustments. Subsequently, the Company developed proposed
amendments to U.S. federal income tax returns for additional periods through 2006. On the basis of previously accepted amendments, the Company has determined that these adjustments will
more-likely-than-not be accepted and, accordingly, has recorded such adjustments in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Such adjustments did not have a material
impact on the Company's financial condition, results of

operations
or cash flows. While the final adjustments cannot be determined until the IRS review is completed, the Company believes that any resulting adjustments will not have a material impact on its
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. For a detailed discussion of income tax matters, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As previously reported in our periodic filings, the Company has received and responded to various allegations and other information
that certain improper payments were made by our subsidiaries and agents in recent years. For example, two subsidiaries in our Flow Control business in Italy have been charged, along with numerous
other parties, in connection with the Milan public prosecutor's investigation into allegedly improper payments made to certain Italian entities, and we have reported to German authorities potentially
improper conduct involving agents retained by our EMEA water business. We have reported to the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the SEC the investigative steps and remedial measures that we have
taken in response to these allegations and its internal investigations. We also informed the DOJ and the SEC that we retained outside counsel to perform a Company-wide baseline review of
our policies, controls and practices with respect to compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"), and that we would continue to make periodic progress reports to these agencies. We have
and will continue to communicate with the DOJ and SEC to provide updates on the baseline review and follow-up investigations, including, as appropriate, briefings concerning additional
instances of potential improper payments identified by us in the course of our ongoing compliance activities. The baseline review revealed that some business practices may not comply with Tyco and
FCPA requirements. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of these matters and other allegations reported to regulatory and law enforcement authorities and therefore cannot estimate the range of
potential loss or extent of risk, if any, that may result from an adverse resolution of these matters. However, it is possible that we may be required to pay material fines, consent to injunctions on
future conduct, or suffer other criminal or civil penalties or adverse impacts, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Covidien
and Tyco Electronics agreed, in connection with the Separation, to cooperate with the Company in its response regarding these matters. Any judgment required to be paid or
settlement or other cost incurred by the Company in connection with the FCPA investigations would be subject to the liability sharing provisions of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, which
assigned liabilities primarily related to the former Healthcare and Electronics businesses of Tyco to Covidien or Tyco Electronics, respectively, and provides that Tyco will retain liabilities
primarily related to its continuing operations. Any liabilities not primarily related to a particular business will be shared equally among Tyco, Covidien and Tyco Electronics.

The
German Federal Cartel Office ("FCO") charged in early 2007 that certain German subsidiaries in the Company's Flow Control business have engaged in anti-competitive
practices, in particular with regard to its hydrant, valve, street box and fittings business. The Company investigated this matter and determined that the conduct may have violated German
anti-trust law. The Company is cooperating with the FCO in its investigation of this violation, which is ongoing. The Company cannot estimate the range of potential loss that may result
from this violation. It is possible that the Company may be subject to civil or criminal proceedings and may be required to pay
judgments, suffer penalties or incur settlements in amounts that may have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

the
Fund can prove that an employer completely or partially withdraws from a multi-employer pension plan such as the Fund, the employer is liable for withdrawal liability equal to its proportionate
share of the plan's unfunded vested benefits. The alleged withdrawal results from a 1994 labor dispute between Grinnell Fire Protection Systems, SimplexGrinnell's predecessor, and Road Sprinkler
Fitters Local Union No. 669.

ERISA
requires that payment of withdrawal liability be made in full or in quarterly installments commencing upon receipt of a liability assessment from the plan. A plan's assessment of
withdrawal liability generally may be challenged only in arbitration, and ERISA requires that quarterly payments must continue to be made during the pendency of the arbitration. If the employer
prevails in arbitration (and any subsequent court appeals), its quarterly withdrawal liability payments are refunded with interest. The Fund's total withdrawal liability assessment against
SimplexGrinnell is approximately $25 million. The quarterly withdrawal liability payments are $1.1 million, $11 million of which have been paid to date. While the ultimate outcome
is uncertain, SimplexGrinnell believes that it has strong arguments that no withdrawal liability is owed to the Fund, and it plans to vigorously defend against the Fund's withdrawal liability
assessment. The matter is currently in arbitration. The Company has made no provision for this contingency and believes that its quarterly payments are recoverable.

As previously reported, in 2002, the SEC's Division of Enforcement conducted an investigation related to past accounting practices for
dealer connect fees that ADT had charged to its authorized dealers upon purchasing customer accounts. The investigation related to accounting practices employed by our former management, which were
discontinued in 2003. Although we settled with the SEC in 2006, a number of former dealers and related parties have filed lawsuits against us, including a class action lawsuit filed in the District
Court of Arapahoe County, Colorado, alleging breach of contract and other claims related to ADT's decision to terminate certain authorized
dealers in 2002 and 2003. While it is not possible at this time to predict the final outcome of these lawsuits, we do not believe these claims will have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
addition to the foregoing, we are subject to claims and suits, including from time to time, contractual disputes and product and general liability claims incidental to present and
former operations, acquisitions and dispositions. With respect to many of these claims, we either self-insure or maintain insurance through third-parties, with varying deductibles. While
the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the resolution of any such proceedings, whether the underlying claims are covered by insurance or not, will
not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows beyond amounts recorded for such matters.

The number of registered holders of Tyco's common shares as of November 6, 2009 was 25,590.

Tyco
common shares are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "TYC." The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices of Tyco
common shares as reported by the NYSE, and the dividends declared on Tyco common shares, for the quarterly
periods presented below. Effective March 17, 2009, Tyco changed its jurisdiction of incorporation from Bermuda to the Canton of Schaffhausen, Switzerland. In connection with the Change of
Domicile, the par value of Tyco's common shares increased from $0.80 per share to 8.53 Swiss francs (CHF) per share (or $7.21 based on the exchange rate in effect on March 17, 2009). The Change
of Domicile was approved at a special general meeting of shareholders held on March 12, 2009. The following steps occurred in connection with the Change of Domicile, which did not result in a
change to Total Shareholders' Equity:

(1)

approximately
21 million shares held directly or indirectly in treasury were cancelled;

(2)

the
par value of common shares was increased from $0.80 to CHF 8.53 through an approximate 1-for-9 reverse share split,
followed by the issuance of approximately eight fully paid up shares so that the same number of shares were outstanding before and after the Change of Domicile, which reduced share premium and
increased common shares; and

(3)

the
remaining amount of share premium was eliminated with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus.

Year Ended September 25, 2009

Year Ended September 26, 2008

Market Price
Range

Market Price
Range

Dividends Declared
Per Common
Share(1)

Dividends Declared
Per Common
Share

Quarter

High

Low

High

Low

First

$

35.02

$

15.65

$

0.20

$

46.66

$

37.88

$

0.15

Second

24.57

17.43

0.21

44.85

33.72

0.15

Third

28.86

18.88

0.21

47.41

40.08

0.15

Fourth

34.87

25.55

0.22

45.15

36.37

0.20

$

0.84

$

0.65

(1)

The
dividends declared for the second through fourth quarters of 2009, are the U.S. dollar equivalent of CHF 0.23 converted at the
U.S. dollar/Swiss franc exchange rate shortly before the payment dates.

Prior to the Change of Domicile, on December 4, 2008, Tyco's Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend on the Company's common
shares of $0.20 per share, which was paid on February 2, 2009 to shareholders of record on January 5, 2009. Subsequent to the Change of Domicile, on March 12, 2009 Tyco's
shareholders approved an annual dividend of CHF 0.93 to be paid out of registered share capital in four quarterly installments. On March 12, 2009 and May 7, 2009 Tyco's Board of
Directors declared the first and second installments of the quarterly dividend on the Company's common shares of $0.21 which were paid on May 27, 2009 and August 26, 2009, respectively,
to shareholders of record on April 30, 3009 and July 31, 2009, respectively. On September 10, 2009, Tyco's Board of Directors declared the third installment of the quarterly
dividend on the Company's common shares of CHF 0.23 per share (or $0.22 per share converted at the U.S. dollar/Swiss franc exchange rate as of October 30, 2009). This dividend is payable
on November 24,

Pursuant to Swiss law, dividend payments made prior to January 1, 2011 are subject to Swiss withholding taxes unless made in the
form of a return of capital from our registered share capital. As a result, we intend to first pay dividends in the form of a reduction of registered share capital, denominated in Swiss francs, until
at least January 1, 2011. However, we expect to actually pay dividends in U.S. dollars based on exchange rates in effect shortly before the payment date. Fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar compared to the Swiss franc between the date the dividend is declared and paid will increase or decrease the U.S. dollar amount required to be paid. We manage the potential variability in cash
flows associated with the dividend payments by entering into derivative financial instruments used as economic hedges of the underlying risk. After January 1, 2011, we expect to make dividend
payments in the form of a reduction in contributed surplus, which also may be made free of Swiss withholding taxes. We expect to obtain shareholder approval of an annual dividend amount each year at
our annual general meeting, and we expect to distribute the approved dividend amount in four quarterly installments, the timing of which will be determined by our Board of Directors. The timing,
declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of our common shares will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition and results of operations, the capital requirements of our
businesses, industry practice and any other relevant factors. Future dividends will be proposed by our Board of Directors and, as stated above, require shareholder approval. Dividends paid from
contributed surplus also require shareholder approval, but may be denominated and paid in U.S. dollars.

Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on Tyco's common shares against the cumulative return on
the S&P 500 Index, Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index and the S&P 500 Industrials Index, assuming investment of $100 on September 30, 2004, including the reinvestment of dividends.
The graph shows the cumulative total return as of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005, September 29, 2006, September 28, 2007, September 26, 2008 and
September 25, 2009. In July 2007, Tyco began using performance share units as a component of its annual equity incentive program. The benchmark against which Tyco's total shareholder return is
measured is the S&P 500 Industrials Index. As a result, the S&P 500 Industrials Index will replace the Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index in the performance graph below.

The following table provides information as of September 25, 2009 with respect to Tyco's common shares issuable under its equity
compensation plans:

Equity Compensation Plan

Plan Category

Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options
(a)

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
(b)

Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

2004 Stock and Incentive Plan(1)

22,747,724

$

43.99

26,477,465

LTIP Plan(2)

4,223,461

36.71



ESPP(3)





2,919,845

26,971,185

29,397,310

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

LTIP II Plan(4)

4,943,610

$

53.78



SAYE(5)

375,906

32.82

7,024,865

5,319,516

7,024,865

Total

32,290,701

36,422,175

(1)

The
Tyco International Ltd. 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan provides for the award of stock options, restricted shares and other equity
and equity-based awards to Board members, officers and non-officer employees. Amount shown under shares outstanding includes 200,358 deferred stock unit ("DSU") grants and dividend
equivalents earned on each DSU account, 17,393,133 shares to be issued upon exercise of options, 3,736,710 restricted stock units and 1,417,523 performance share units representing target payout.
There are currently no restricted share awards outstanding under this plan. Amount shown under shares available reflects the aggregate shares available under Tyco International Ltd. Long Term
Incentive Plan ("LTIP"), LTIP II and the 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan. Shares available under LTIP and LTIP II in March 2004 were rolled into the 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan as of the inception of
the Plan.

(2)

The
LTIP allows for the grant of stock options and other equity or equity-based grants to Board members, officers and non-officer
employees. Amount shown includes 3,356,003 shares to be issued upon exercise of options, and 867,458 DSU grants and dividend equivalents earned on each DSU account. Of the 3.3 million shares,
83,208 are outstanding stock options assumed in connection with acquisitions at a weighted-average exercise price of $127.03. No additional options may be granted under those assumed plans. Effective
as of inception of the 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan, no additional grants may be made under the LTIP or the LTIP II.

(3)

This
table includes 2,919,845 shares available for future issuance under the Tyco Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP"), which represents the
number of remaining shares registered for issuance under this plan. All of the shares delivered to participants under the ESPP were purchased in the open market. The ESPP was suspended indefinitely
during the fourth quarter of 2009.

(4)

Under
the terms of the 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan adopted in March 2004, no additional options, equity or equity-based grants will be made
to Board members, officers and non-officer employees under the LTIP or the LTIP II. LTIP II allowed for the grant of stock options and other equity or equity-based grants to employees who
are not officers of Tyco. Under this plan, non-officer employees or former employees of Tyco or a subsidiary could receive: (i) options to purchase Tyco

common
shares; (ii) stock appreciation rights; (iii) awards payable in cash, common shares, other securities or other property, based on the achievement of performance goals;
(iv) dividend equivalents, consisting of a right to receive payments equivalent to dividends declared on Tyco common shares; and (v) other stock-based awards as determined by the
Compensation and Human Resources Committee ("Committee"). The exercise price of options and stock appreciation rights would generally be fair market value on the date of grant, but could be lower in
certain circumstances. No individual could receive awards for more than 12,000,000 shares (or 3,000,000 shares on a post-reverse stock split basis) in any calendar year. Terms and
conditions of awards were determined by the Committee. Awards could be deferred, and could be payable in any form the Committee determined, including cash, Tyco common shares, other securities or
other property. The Committee may modify awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events, including a change of control. The shares granted under the LTIP II will be issued at vesting under
the 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan.

(5)

The
Tyco International Ltd. United Kingdom ("UK") Savings Related Share Option Plan ("SAYE") is a UK Inland Revenue approved plan for
UK employees pursuant to which employees were granted options to purchase shares at the end of three years of service at a 15% discount off of the market price at time of grant. Employees made monthly
contributions that were, at the election of the employee, used for the purchase price of shares or the contribution could have been returned to the employee. The total amount of shares that may have
been purchased at the end of the three years of service was equal to the total of the monthly contributions, plus a tax-free bonus amount equal to a multiple of the aggregate amount of
monthly contributions, divided by the option price. An option will generally be exercisable only during the period of six months following the three-year period. The plan was administered
by the Company's International Benefits Oversight Committee, appointed by the Committee. The International Benefits Oversight Committee, among other things, determined when to grant options and set
the option price. The SAYE Plan was approved on November 3, 1999 for a ten year period and has expired according to its terms on November 3, 2009. The International Benefits Oversight
Committee has not approved any additional grants since the last annual grant on October 9, 2008 and it has not applied for approval of a replacement for the SAYE Plan at this time.

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs

Maximum Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares That May Yet Be
Purchased Under
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs

6/27/097/24/09









7/25/098/28/09









8/29/099/25/09







$

900,000,000

During
the quarter, the Company did not repurchase any common shares on the NYSE as part of the $1.0 billion share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors in July
2008 ("2008 Share
Repurchase Program"). Approximately $900 million remained outstanding under the 2008 Share Repurchase Program as of September 25, 2009.

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data of Tyco. This data is derived from Tyco's Consolidated Financial
Statements for the five years ended September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008, September 28, 2007, September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. This
selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Tyco's Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report as well as the section of this Annual
Report titled Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

2009(1)

2008(2)

2007(3)

2006(4)

2005(5)

(in millions, except per share data)

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

Net revenue

$

17,237

$

20,199

$

18,477

$

17,066

$

16,385

(Loss) income from continuing operations

(1,833

)

1,095

(2,524

)

817

573

Net (loss) income

(1,798

)

1,553

(1,742

)

3,590

3,094

Basic earnings per share:

(Loss) income from continuing operations

(3.87

)

2.26

(5.10

)

1.63

1.14

Net (loss) income

(3.80

)

3.21

(3.52

)

7.14

6.15

Diluted earnings per share:

(Loss) income from continuing operations

(3.87

)

2.25

(5.10

)

1.59

1.11

Net (loss) income

(3.80

)

3.19

(3.52

)

6.95

5.85

Cash dividends per share(6)

0.84

0.65

1.60

1.60

1.25

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (End of Year)(7):

Total assets

$

25,553

$

28,804

$

32,815

$

63,011

$

62,465

Long-term debt

4,029

3,709

4,080

8,856

10,077

Shareholders' equity

12,941

15,494

15,624

35,387

32,619

(1)

Loss
from continuing operations for the year ended September 25, 2009 includes goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges of
$2.7 billion, $251 million of restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges, net, and $33 million of incremental stock option charges for share-based payment
transactions. Loss from continuing operations also includes charges of $125 million related to unresolved legacy security litigation matters. Net loss also includes $35 million of
income, net of income taxes, from discontinued operations.

(2)

Income
from continuing operations for the year ended September 26, 2008 includes a class action settlement credit, net of
$10 million, a $10 million of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges, $4 million of separation costs, restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges, net of
$247 million, $42 million of incremental stock option charges for share-based payment transactions and a $258 million loss on extinguishment of debt related to consent
solicitations and exchange offers and termination of a bridge loan facility. Net income also includes $458 million of income, net of income taxes, from discontinued operations.

(3)

Loss
from continuing operations for the year ended September 28, 2007 includes a class action settlement charge, net of
$2.862 billion, $105 million of separation costs, a $59 million goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges related to the reorganization to a new management and segment
reporting structure, restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges, net of $198 million, $120 million of incremental stock option charges for share-based payment transactions,
a $259 million loss related to the early retirement of debt and $95 million of tax charges related to the Separation primarily for the write-off of deferred tax assets that
will no longer be realizable. Net loss also includes $782 million of income, net of income taxes, from discontinued operations.

(4)

Income
from continuing operations for the year ended September 29, 2006 includes a charge of $100 million related to the
Voluntary Replacement Program, which is included in cost of sales. Also included are $49 million of separation costs, restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges, net of
$15 million, $84 million of incremental stock option charges for share-based payment transactions, $72 million of income related to a settlement with a former executive and
$48 million of income resulting from a reduction in our estimated workers' compensation liabilities primarily due to favorable claims experience. Net income includes $2,787 million of
income, net of income taxes, from discontinued operations as well as a $14 million loss, net of income taxes related to a cumulative effect adjustment recorded in conjunction with our
accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations.

Income
from continuing operations for the year ended September 30, 2005 includes restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture
charges, net of $41 million, a $70 million charge related to certain former executives' employment, a $50 million charge related to an SEC enforcement action, a loss of
$405 million related to the retirement of debt as well as $109 million of income related to a court-ordered restitution award. Net income also includes $2,500 million of income,
net of income taxes, from discontinued operations as well as a $21 million gain, net of income taxes, related to a cumulative effect adjustment recorded in conjunction with the change in
measurement date for pension and postretirement benefit plans.

(6)

See
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for a further
discussion of the Company's dividend policy and 2009 quarterly dividends. Cash dividends per share for the years ended 2007, 2006 and 2005 represent that of Tyco pre-Separation, which
included Covidien and Tyco Electronics.

(7)

The
decrease in total assets, long-term debt and shareholders' equity in 2007 is primarily related to the spin-offs
of Covidien and Tyco Electronics.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the Selected
Financial Data and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including but not limited to
those under the headings "Risk Factors" and "Forward-Looking Information."

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the consolidated results of Tyco International Ltd., a company organized under the
laws of Switzerland, and its subsidiaries (hereinafter collectively referred to as "we," the "Company" or "Tyco"). The financial statements have been prepared in United States dollars ("USD") and in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP").

Flow Control designs, manufactures, sells and services valves, pipes,
fittings, valve automation and heat tracing products for the oil, gas and other energy markets along with general process industries and the water and wastewater markets.

We
also provide general corporate services to our segments and these costs are reported as Corporate and Other.

References
to the segment data are to the Company's continuing operations. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. The Company
has realigned certain business operations as of September 27, 2008, which resulted in certain prior period segment amounts being recast. See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

Overall, fiscal year 2009 results were negatively affected by the economic downturn, which adversely impacted our businesses across
nearly all geographies and industries. Revenue decreased by $3.0 billion, or 14.7%, compared to 2008, and goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges were largely responsible for an
operating loss of $1.5 billion for the year, compared to operating income of $1.9 billion in 2008. Approximately one half of the 2009 revenue decline was due to the general strengthening
of the U.S. dollar during 2009, as over half of our revenue is generated outside the U.S. The remaining revenue decline was due in large part to our Electrical and Metal Products business,

which
saw historically low volumes in 2009. The impact of the weakened global economy on product and systems installation revenue also significantly contributed to the year-over-year decline. On the
other hand, service revenue continued to grow as a percentage of our overall revenue, from 35% in 2008 to 39% in 2009. Our service revenues are principally derived from our ADT Worldwide and Fire
Protection Services businesses, and represent a predictable and consistent source of revenue. Recurring revenue in our ADT Worldwide business now represents approximately 55% of ADT's total revenue
compared to approximately 50% in 2008. In the Fire Protection Services business, service revenue increased as a percentage of Fire Protection's total revenue from 48% in 2008 to 49% in 2009.

Operating
income declined in 2009 compared to 2008 due in large part to non-cash goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges of approximately $2.7 billion during
2009. Operating income was also negatively affected by charges related to restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture activity of approximately $251 million and charges related to legacy
legal matters of approximately $125 million. To a lesser degree, operating income was negatively impacted by reduced volumes due to the economic downturn. Operating income benefited from a
number of key cost containment actions taken in 2009 and 2008, as well as restructuring actions taken in prior periods. We continue to be aggressive in identifying cost saving opportunities and
restructuring activities that should benefit the Company when the economy improves. During 2010, we expect to incur an additional $100 million to $150 million of charges related to
restructuring activity.

As
of September 25, 2009, the Company's cash balance was $2.4 billion, as compared to $1.5 billion as of September 26, 2008. The increase from 2008 to 2009
was primarily due to cash flow from operating activities and proceeds received from the issuance of long-term debt. In 2010, we expect to continue to use our cash to fund internal growth
opportunities, improve productivity across all of our businesses, make acquisitions that strategically fit within our ADT Worldwide, Fire Protection Services and Flow Control businesses and return
capital to shareholders. In 2010, we expect to continue our portfolio refinement efforts by exiting areas that have not provided, and are not expected to provide, an adequate return on investment.
Finally, in 2010, we will continue to focus on growing revenue in key emerging markets and, as noted above, taking advantage of restructuring opportunities that are expected to provide significant
future cost savings.

Annually in the fiscal fourth quarter, and more frequently if triggering events occur, the Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets for impairment by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible assets with its carrying amount.

During
the second quarter of 2009, the Company concluded that its EMEA Security and EMEA Fire reporting units within the ADT Worldwide and Fire Protection Services segments,
respectively, Electrical and Metal Products reporting unit within the Electrical and Metal Products segment and Access Control and Video Systems ("ACVS"), Life Safety and Sensormatic Retail Solutions
("SRS") reporting units within the Safety Products segment experienced triggering events such that the carrying values of these reporting units likely exceeded their fair values. As a result of the
triggering events, the Company performed long-lived asset, goodwill and intangible asset impairment tests for these reporting units and certain of the Company's trade names and franchise
rights. The results of the goodwill impairment tests indicated that the implied goodwill amount was less than the carrying amount of goodwill for each of the aforementioned reporting units. The
Company recorded an aggregate non-cash impairment charge of $2.6 billion ($2.6 billion after-tax) during the second quarter of 2009. The non-cash
impairment charge was recorded in goodwill and intangible asset impairments in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarter ended March 27, 2009.

Also,
during the second quarter of 2009, the Company's estimates of future cash flows used in determining the fair value of its Safety Products segment Sensormatic tradename as well as
certain

ADT
Worldwide segment franchise rights were revised downward relative to the estimates used in the Company's tests during the fourth quarter of 2008. The results of the impairment test indicated that
the Safety Products Sensormatic tradename and ADT Worldwide franchise rights estimated fair values were less than their respective carrying amounts. As a result, the Company recorded an aggregate
non-cash impairment charge of $64 million ($40 million after-tax) during the second quarter of 2009. The non-cash impairment charge was recorded in
goodwill and intangible asset impairments in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarter ended March 27, 2009.

Net revenue, operating (loss) income and net (loss) income for the years ended September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008 and
September 28, 2007 were as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

2007

Revenue from product sales

$

10,482

$

13,064

$

11,816

Service revenue

6,755

7,135

6,661

Net revenue

$

17,237

$

20,199

$

18,477

Operating (loss) income

$

(1,487

)

$

1,941

$

(1,732

)

Interest income

44

110

104

Interest expense

(301

)

(396

)

(313

)

Other expense, net

(7

)

(224

)

(255

)

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest

(1,751

)

1,431

(2,196

)

Income tax expense

(78

)

(335

)

(324

)

Minority interest

(4

)

(1

)

(4

)

(Loss) income from continuing operations

(1,833

)

1,095

(2,524

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

35

458

782

Net (loss) income

$

(1,798

)

$

1,553

$

(1,742

)

Net
revenue decreased $3.0 billion, or 14.7%, for 2009 as compared to 2008, in large part due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which negatively affected 2009 by
$1.5 billion. The remaining decrease in revenue was driven primarily by lower volume of steel products in our Electrical and Metal Products segment and weakness in the commercial markets,
including the retailer end market, which negatively impacted our ADT Worldwide and Safety Products segments. Revenues were positively affected by $110 million for acquisitions and divestitures,
primarily in our ADT Worldwide segment.

Net revenue, goodwill and intangible asset impairments, operating income and operating margin for ADT Worldwide for the years ended
September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007 were as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

2007

Revenue from product sales

$

2,226

$

2,668

$

2,542

Service revenue

4,789

5,063

4,746

Net revenue

$

7,015

$

7,731

$

7,288

Goodwill and intangible asset impairments

$

635

$

1

$

52

Operating income

233

906

817

Operating margin



(1)

11.7

%

11.2

%

(1)

Certain
operating margins have not been presented as management believes such calculations are not meaningful.

Net revenue by geographic area for ADT Worldwide for the years ended September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008, September 28,
2007 was as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

2007

North America

$

4,170

$

4,218

$

4,094

Europe, Middle East and Africa

1,834

2,355

2,214

Rest of World

1,011

1,158

980

$

7,015

$

7,731

$

7,288

Net
revenue for ADT Worldwide decreased $716 million, or 9.3%, during 2009 as compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily driven by the unfavorable impact of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates of $590 million. Revenue was positively affected by $152 million for the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures. Revenue from product sales decreased 16.6%
and service revenue decreased 5.4%. Revenue from product sales includes sales and installation of electronic security and other systems. Service revenue is comprised of electronic security services
and maintenance, including the monitoring of burglar alarms, fire alarms and other life safety systems as well as services related to retailer anti-theft systems. Approximately 55% of
ADT's total net revenue is contractual and is considered recurring revenue. Recurring revenue declined 3.6% during 2009 primarily as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates which
unfavorably impacted recurring revenue by 7.5% offset by growth in North America and Asia. Systems installation and service revenue declined 15.3% partially due to a result of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, which unfavorably impacted system installation and service revenue by 8.3%, and lower sales volume due to continued weakness in the commercial markets, including the retailer
end market. Geographically, revenue in North America decreased $48 million, or 1.1%, resulting from reduced spending primarily in the commercial markets, including the retailer end market.
Revenue in EMEA decreased $521 million, or 22.1%, largely as a result of foreign currency exchange rates, which had an unfavorable impact of $323 million. The remaining decrease in EMEA
was primarily a result of a decline in systems installation and service revenue due to a slowdown in the commercial markets, including the retailer end market. Revenue
declined $147 million, or 12.7%, in the Rest of World geographies, which was primarily due to the unfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of $219 million
partially offset by growth in Asia and Latin America.

Attrition
rates for customers in our ADT Worldwide business increased over the prior year to 13.4% on a trailing 12-month basis for 2009, as compared to 12.9% for 2008 and
12.3% in 2007. The increased attrition was primarily due to adverse market conditions in the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, South Africa, Asia and Australia.

Operating
income in 2009 decreased $673 million as compared to 2008. Based on the deterioration in the commercial markets, including the retailer end market discussed above, the
Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $613 million related to its ADT EMEA reporting unit and intangible asset impairment charges of $22 million related to certain franchise
rights within North America during the second quarter of 2009. The decrease is also related to the unfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of $44 million. The decrease
was further driven by the decline in sales volume as well as an increase in bad debt charges, both as a result of the weakness experienced in the commercial markets, including the retailer end market,
and the current adverse global economic conditions. Additionally, advertising costs increased which adversely affected operating income. Operating income was negatively impacted by restructuring,
asset impairment and divestiture charges of $87 million in 2009. Operating income in 2008 included restructuring charges of $94 million and expenses of $51 million primarily to
convert customers from analog to digital signal transmission in North America. There were no charges related to converting customers to digital signal during 2009. The decline in operating income was
partially offset by savings realized through cost containment and restructuring actions.

Net
revenue for ADT Worldwide increased $443 million, or 6.1%, during 2008, with product revenue up 5.0% and service revenue up 6.7%, as compared to 2007. Approximately 50% of
ADT's total net revenue is contractual and is considered recurring revenue. Overall, recurring revenue grew 7.2% during 2008 while systems installation and service revenue grew 4.9%. Geographically,
North America grew 3%, resulting largely from growth in recurring revenue which was partially offset by weakness in the retailer end market. The North America net revenue increase also includes the
impact of acquisitions, which contributed $53 million. The year-over-year net revenue increase in North America was partially offset by weakness in the retailer end
market during the fourth quarter of 2008. Revenue in the EMEA region increased $141 million, or 6.4%, as a result of foreign currency exchange rates which had a favorable impact of
$142 million. This increase was partially offset by a decline in systems installation and service revenue due to weakness in the retailer end market as well as commercial softness primarily in
the United Kingdom. The 18.2% revenue growth in the Rest of World geographies was primarily driven by growth in both recurring revenue and contracting across all regions. The Rest of the World
increase included the favorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of $30 million. Overall, the ADT Worldwide net revenue increase
included the favorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of $204 million. The net impact of acquisitions, divestitures, and other activity positively affected revenue by
$27 million.

Operating
margin in ADT Worldwide increased to 11.7% in 2008 from 11.2% in 2007. North America is one of the most profitable geographic areas for ADT Worldwide with 2008 and 2007
operating margin of 15.8% and 16.9%, respectively. Margins in North America were negatively impacted by $57 million of restructuring and asset impairments in 2008 compared to $6 million
in 2007. Restructuring charges in 2008 include $58 million relating to the reacquisition of certain franchise rights that were deemed to be unfavorable to the Company. There were no charges
related to the reacquisition of franchise rights in 2007. In addition, North America incurred $48 million and $12 million to convert customers from analog to digital signal transmissions
in 2008 and 2007, respectively. North America operating margins benefited from growth in recurring revenue partially offset by declines in the retailer end market. ADT EMEA had 2008 and 2007 operating
margin of 5.0% and 2.5%, respectively. EMEA's operating income included $34 million of restructuring and impairments in 2008 compared with $67 million in 2007. EMEA margins benefited
from reduced costs as a result of the restructuring program, which was partially offset by volume decreases as discussed above.

Operating
income in 2008 increased $89 million, or 10.9%, as compared to 2007. Factors that positively impacted operating income included increased volume, particularly our higher
margin recurring revenue, operational efficiencies, including those achieved from restructuring activities in Europe, lower depreciation and amortization expense and lower long-lived asset
impairment charges. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense occurred primarily in North America and resulted from changes to the depreciation method and estimated useful lives for pooled
subscriber assets and changes to the estimated useful lives of dealer intangible assets. The reduction in depreciation and amortization expense was partially offset by increased net expenses of
$51 million, which primarily related to converting customers from analog to digital signal transmissions in North America. Results for 2007 include goodwill impairment charges due to the
reorganization of our management and segment reporting structure following the Separation.

Net revenue, operating income and operating margin for Flow Control for the years ended September 25, 2009, September 26,
2008 and September 28, 2007 were as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

2007

Revenue from product sales

$

3,580

$

4,201

$

3,618

Service revenue

270

217

148

Net revenue

$

3,850

$

4,418

$

3,766

Operating income

$

518

$

618

$

457

Operating margin

13.5

%

14.0

%

12.1

%

Net
revenue for Flow Control decreased $568 million, or 12.9%, in 2009 as compared to 2008. The decrease in net revenue was primarily driven by the unfavorable impact of changes
in foreign currency exchange rates of $462 million. Revenue also decreased due to reduced volume in the water business and reduced project activity in the energy end market of the thermal
controls business. The decrease in revenue was partially offset by an increase in the valves business primarily from the energy end market
in EMEA. The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures unfavorably impacted net revenue by $3 million in 2009 and favorably impacted net revenue by $16 million in 2008.

Operating
income decreased $100 million, or 16.2%, in 2009 as compared to 2008. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to the unfavorable impact of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates of $73 million as well as decreased volume in the water businesses discussed above offset by margin improvements in the valves business. Margins were also negatively
impacted by restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges of $29 million. Additionally, management estimates that $5 million of additional charges resulting from restructuring
actions were incurred during 2009. Restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges were $8 million in 2008. Additionally, selling, general and administrative expenses in 2008 included
an environmental remediation charge of $6 million related to the closure of a facility in North America. The decline in operating income was partially offset by savings realized through cost
containment and restructuring actions.

Net
revenue for Flow Control increased $652 million, or 17.3%, in 2008 as compared to 2007. The increase in net revenue was largely driven by volume growth from continued strength
in the valves and thermal businesses, and to a lesser extent, the water business. The increase in the valves business was primarily driven by project growth in the oil and gas industry while the
thermal business benefited primarily from strong project growth coupled with increased selling prices. While revenue within the water business increased year-over-year, project activity declined
during the second half of 2008, primarily in Australia. Favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates positively impacted revenue by $314 million. The net impact of acquisitions,
divestitures and other activity positively affected revenue by $6 million.

Operating
income increased $161 million, or 35.2%, in 2008 as compared to 2007 primarily from revenue growth, as well as volume efficiencies. Flow Control incurred restructuring,
asset impairment and divestiture charges, net of $8 million, compared to $28 million in 2007. Additionally, selling, general and administrative expenses in 2008 included an environmental
remediation charge of $6 million related to the closure of a facility in North America as compared to no charges in 2007.

Net revenue, goodwill and intangible asset impairments, operating income and operating margin for Fire Protection Services for the
years ended September 25, 2009 September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007 were as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

2007

Revenue from product sales

$

1,751

$

2,013

$

1,982

Service revenue

1,677

1,826

1,744

Net revenue

$

3,428

$

3,839

$

3,726

Goodwill and intangible asset impairments

$

180

$

9

$



Operating income

68

325

283

Operating margin



(1)

8.5

%

7.6

%

(1)

Certain
operating margins have not been presented as management believes such calculations are not meaningful.

Net revenue for Fire Protection Services decreased $411 million, or 10.7%, during 2009 as compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily due
to the impact of unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates of $294 million. Additionally, revenue declined due to the continued weakness in the commercial market and current
adverse global economic conditions. Revenue from product sales includes sales and installation of fire protection and other systems. Service revenue consists of inspection, maintenance, service and
monitoring of fire detection and suppression systems. Geographically, revenue in our international fire businesses decreased by $294 million largely due to the impact of unfavorable changes in
foreign currency exchange rates discussed above as well as the continued weakness in the European commercial markets. Additionally, revenue in our North America SimplexGrinnell business decreased by
$116 million primarily due to a decline in systems installation and upgrade activity in the sprinkler business.

Operating
income decreased $257 million during 2009 as compared to 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a $180 million goodwill impairment in EMEA recorded during 2009
compared to a $9 million goodwill impairment in Latin America recorded during 2008. The decrease was further driven by the decline in sales volume discussed above as well as an increase in bad
debt charges, both as a result of the weakness experienced in the commercial markets and the current adverse global economic conditions. There were restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture
charges of $45 million in 2009 as compared to $25 million in 2008. Additionally, operating income decreased due to the unfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of
$9 million. The decline in operating income was partially offset by savings realized through cost containment and restructuring actions.

Net
revenue for Fire Protection Services increased $113 million, or 3.0%, during 2008 as compared to 2007, driven by increases in both product sales and service revenues. This
increase in product sales was aided by foreign currency exchange rates, which had a favorable impact of $74 million. The increase in service revenue related to growth in service work and
sprinkler contracting in North America and Asia primarily as a result of an increase in demand from the education and healthcare industries in North America and commercial expansion in the Asia
region. Additionally, changes in foreign currency exchange rates had a favorable impact of $60 million on service revenue. The increase was partially offset by reduced revenue in EMEA and
Australia/New Zealand primarily due to a decline in contracting revenue as a result of a strategic initiative to be more selective in our pursuit of contracts. Additionally, the net revenue increase
was partially offset due to the planned exit of low performing non-core activities in Latin America and Asia. Overall, the Fire Protection Services net revenue increase included the
favorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of $134 million.

Operating
income increased $42 million, or 14.8%, during 2008 as compared to 2007 resulting largely from increased volume and improved margins, primarily in North America, and to
a lesser extent, Asia and EMEA. The increase in operating income during 2008 was partially offset by $25 million of restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges. Also, operating
income was unfavorably impacted by $9 million due to a goodwill impairment in the Latin America reporting unit.

Net revenue, goodwill and intangible asset impairments, operating income and operating margin for Electrical and Metal Products for the
years ended September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007 were as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

2007

Revenue from product sales

$

1,389

$

2,266

$

1,970

Service revenue

3

6

4

Net revenue

$

1,392

$

2,272

$

1,974

Goodwill and intangible asset impairments

$

935

$



$



Operating (loss) income

(940

)

342

159

Operating margin



(1)

15.1

%

8.1

%

(1)

Certain
operating margins have not been presented as management believes such calculations are not meaningful.

Net revenue for Electrical and Metal Products decreased $880 million, or 38.7%, in 2009 as compared to 2008. The decrease in revenue was
primarily due to lower volume and selling prices of steel products largely resulting from a decline in the commercial market in North America. Lower volume and selling prices for armored cable
products also contributed to the decline. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates had an unfavorable impact of $52 million. The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures negatively
affected revenue by approximately $31 million.

Operating
income decreased $1.3 billion in 2009 as compared to 2008. Based on the sales volume decrease as well as the significant decline in the price of steel, the Company
recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $935 million during the second quarter of 2009. There was no goodwill impairment recorded during 2008. The decrease in operating income also related to
volume declines as well as lower spreads for steel products. Spreads for steel products continued to decline as a direct result of higher raw material costs and lower selling prices. Lower
restructuring and divestiture charges incurred in 2009 as compared to similar charges incurred in 2008 partially offset the decline in operating income discussed above. Results for 2009 included
restructuring and divestiture charges of $21 million as compared to $43 million for 2008. Additionally, management estimates that $1 million of additional charges resulting from
restructuring actions were incurred during 2009.

Net
revenue for Electrical and Metal Products increased $298 million, or 15.1%, in 2008 as compared to 2007. The increase in net revenue was largely driven by selling price
increases for steel tubular products and to a lesser extent armored cable products partially offset by decreased sales volume for both products. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates had a
favorable impact of $44 million.

Operating
income increased $183 million, or 115.1%, in 2008 as compared to 2007. The increase in operating income was primarily due to favorable spreads on both steel tubular and
armored cable products. Income generated by higher selling prices for both steel tubular and armored cable products were partially offset by decreased sales volume for both products. Operational
excellence initiatives resulted in reductions in production cost rates for both steel tubular and armored cable products. The increase in operating income during 2008 was partially offset by
$43 million of restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges, as compared to $7 million in 2007.

Net revenue, goodwill and intangible asset impairments, operating income and operating margin for Safety Products for the years ended
September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007 were as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

2007

Revenue from product sales

$

1,536

$

1,916

$

1,704

Service revenue

16

18

15

Net revenue

$

1,552

$

1,934

$

1,719

Goodwill and intangible asset impairments

$

955

$



$

7

Operating (loss) income

(789

)

284

274

Operating margin



(1)

14.7

%

15.9

%

(1)

Certain
operating margins have not been presented as management believes such calculations are not meaningful.

Net revenue for Safety Products decreased $382 million, or 19.8%, during 2009 as compared to 2008. The decrease is primarily related to
reduced volume in our fire suppression business, life safety and electronic security businesses, which continued to be impacted by the soft economic conditions. The remaining decrease is related to
the unfavorable impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates of $122 million. The decrease in our fire suppression business was primarily due to reduced spending in the commercial
construction market. The decrease in the life safety business was primarily due to reduced municipal spending. The electronic security business decrease was primarily due to the slow down in the
retail sector, as retail capital projects and new store openings were canceled or delayed.

Operating
income decreased $1.1 billion in 2009 as compared to 2008. The decline is primarily attributable to goodwill and intangible impairment charges of $955 million
recorded during the quarter ended March 27, 2009 as a result of the continued slowdown in the commercial and retail markets. As discussed above, decreased sales volume within the fire
suppression, life safety and electronic security businesses also negatively impacted operating income. Operating income was negatively impacted by restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture
charges of $46 million during 2009. Additionally, management estimates that $9 million of additional charges resulting from restructuring actions were incurred during 2009. The same
period in the prior year included $73 million of restructuring and asset impairment charges. Operating income also decreased by $18 million due to unfavorable changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. Operating income was also negatively impacted by a charge of $8 million relating to the amount of depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recorded had a
business that was previously classified as held for sale been continuously classified as held and used (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Net
revenue for Safety Products increased $215 million, or 12.5%, during 2008 as compared to 2007 primarily from strong performance in the fire suppression, and to a lesser extent
electronic security and life safety businesses. The increase in the fire suppression business was driven by continued growth in the energy and marine sectors, favorable product mix and increased
selling prices to offset increasing raw material costs. The increase in the life safety business was primarily driven by growth in North America as a result of increased spending by fire departments
and from increased selling prices. The increase in the electronic security business was partially due to higher volume and new product introductions primarily related to casinos and schools. Favorable
changes in foreign currency exchange rates of $76 million also contributed to the increase in revenue.

Operating
income increased $10 million, or 3.6% in 2008 as compared to 2007. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to increased sales volume along with the
impact of cost

savings
from operational excellence initiatives. The increase in operating income during 2008 was partially offset by $73 million of restructuring, asset impairment, and divestiture charges,
net as compared to $29 million in 2007.

Corporate expense for 2009 was $43 million higher as compared to the prior year, primarily resulting from a charge of
$125 million related to the settlement of legacy securities matters, which was partially offset by $16 million benefit related to a settlement reached with a former executive.
Additionally, corporate expense in 2009 included $16 million of restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges. Corporate expense for 2008 included net charges of $28 million
composed of a $29 million charge for a legacy legal settlement, $4 million of separation costs and $5 million for restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges, net,
offset by a credit of $10 million for class action settlement recoveries. The remaining decrease in corporate expense is primarily related to cost reduction initiatives and the restructuring
program.

Corporate
expense for 2008 was $3.2 billion lower as compared to the prior year, primarily resulting from various charges in 2007, including the class action settlement charge of
$2.862 billion, separation costs of $117 million and net restructuring and asset impairment charges of $40 million primarily related to the consolidation of certain headquarter
functions. Corporate expense for 2008 included net charges of $28 million composed of a $29 million charge for a legacy legal settlement, $4 million of separation costs and
$5 million for restructuring, asset impairment and divestiture charges, net, offset by a credit of $10 million for class action settlement recoveries. The remaining decrease in corporate
expense is primarily related to cost reduction initiatives and the restructuring program.

In the first half of fiscal 2009, the Company settled a number of legal matters stemming from alleged violations of federal securities
laws committed by former senior management, including several lawsuits from plaintiffs that had opted out of the June 2007 class action settlement, for an aggregate amount of approximately
$90 million. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Company's share of this amount was approximately $24 million, with Covidien and Tyco Electronics responsible for
approximately $38 million and $28 million, respectively.

During
the second quarter of 2009, the Company concluded that its best estimate of probable loss for its unresolved legacy securities matters was $375 million. Due to the fact
that any payments ultimately made in connection with these matters would be subject to the sharing provisions of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Company also recorded receivables from
Covidien and Tyco Electronics in the amounts of $158 million and $116 million, respectively. As a result, the Company recorded a net charge of $101 million during the quarter
ended March 27, 2009 in selling, general, and administrative expenses related to these unresolved matters.

In
the second half of fiscal 2009, the Company agreed to settle with all of the remaining plaintiffs that had opted-out of the class action settlement as well as plaintiffs
who had brought ERISA related claims for a total of $271 million. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, the Company's share of the settlement amount was approximately
$73 million, with Covidien and Tyco Electronics responsible for approximately $114 million and $84 million, respectively. This settlement activity did not result in the Company
recording a charge to its Consolidated Statements of Operations as the Company had established a reserve for its best estimate of the amount of loss during the second quarter of 2009 as discussed
above. The Company continues to believe that the accrual remaining as of September 25, 2009 is its best estimate for the remaining unresolved claims. Although the Company has reserved its best
estimate of probable loss, related to unresolved legacy securities claims, their

Interest income was $44 million in 2009, as compared to $110 million and $104 million in 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The decrease in interest income in 2009, and the increase in interest income in 2008, is primarily related to $47 million of interest earned on funds held in escrow prior to
settlement of the class action during 2008 and lower investment yields during 2009.

Interest
expense was $301 million in 2009, as compared to $396 million in 2008 and $313 million in 2007. The decrease in interest expense in 2009 primarily relates
to interest on the class action settlement liability of $47 million and cost related to our bridge loan of $48 million in 2008. The increase in interest expense in 2008 was a result of
$47 million of interest on funds held in escrow related to the class action settlement liability, and increased costs related to our bridge loan and revolving credit facilities.

The
weighted-average interest rate on total debt outstanding as of September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007 was 6.6%, 6.2% and 6.3%,
respectively.

In
2007, net interest amounts were proportionally allocated to Covidien and Tyco Electronics based on the debt amounts that we believe were utilized by Covidien and Tyco Electronics
historically inclusive of amounts directly incurred, and is included in discontinued operations. Allocated net interest was calculated using our historical weighted-average interest rate on debt,
including the impact of interest rate swap agreements. The portion of Tyco's interest income allocated to Covidien and Tyco Electronics was $35 million during 2007. The portion of Tyco's
interest expense allocated to Covidien and Tyco Electronics was $242 million during 2007.

Other expense, net was $7 million in 2009 compared to $224 million in 2008 and $255 million in 2007. Other
expense, net in 2009 primarily relates to a $14 million charge recorded as a result of a decrease in the receivables due from Covidien and Tyco Electronics under the Tax Sharing Agreement,
which was partially offset by income of $5 million relating to a gain on derivative contracts used to economically hedge the foreign currency risk related to the Swiss franc denominated
dividends.

Other
expense, net during 2008, includes $258 million on extinguishment of debt related to the consent solicitation and exchange offers and termination of the bridge loan facility
offset by income of $6 million recorded in connection with the settlement of its 3.125% convertible senior debentures and related financial instruments. See Notes 12 and 14 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. We also recorded other-than-temporary impairments and realized losses on the sale of investments of $6 million related primarily to
investments in corporate debt. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, we recorded $40 million of income as a result of an increase in the receivables due from
Covidien and Tyco Electronics under the Tax Sharing Agreement in connection with the adoption of the guidance pertaining to the accounting for uncertain income taxes. We also recorded
$6 million of expense for other activity in accordance with the Tax Sharing Agreement during 2008.

During
2007, other expense, net consisted primarily of a $259 million loss on early extinguishment of debt incurred in connection with debt tender offers undertaken in connection
with the Separation, for which no tax benefit is available. This charge consists primarily of premiums paid and the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts. The total
loss on early extinguishment of debt was

The effective income tax rate for 2009 is not meaningful primarily as a result of the loss driven by the goodwill impairment charges of
$2.6 billion, for which almost no tax benefit is available. Our effective income tax rate was 23.4% for 2008. Income taxes during 2008 were positively impacted by increased profitability in
lower tax rate jurisdictions and release of deferred tax valuation allowances partially offset by enacted tax law changes that negatively impacted the non-U.S. deferred tax assets. The
effective tax rate for 2007 is not meaningful primarily as a result of the class action settlement charge, net of $2.862 billion and the loss on early extinguishment of debt of
$259 million for which no tax benefit is available. Additionally, taxes for 2007 were negatively impacted by tax costs related to the Separation and were favorably impacted by the release of a
deferred tax valuation allowance related to non-U.S. tax rulings received during the period and reduced reserve requirements on certain legacy tax matters.

The
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $791 million and $742 million as of September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively, relates
principally to the uncertainty of the utilization of certain deferred tax assets, primarily tax loss and credit carryforwards in various jurisdictions. The valuation allowance was calculated and
recorded when we determined that it was more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of our deferred tax assets would not be realized. We believe that we will generate sufficient future taxable income
to realize the tax benefits related to the remaining net deferred tax assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The
calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. We
record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. These tax
liabilities are reflected net of related tax loss carryforwards. We adjust these liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances; however, due to the complexity of some of these
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. Substantially all of these potential tax liabilities are
recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as payment is not expected within one year.

In connection with the spin-offs of Covidien and Tyco Electronics from Tyco, Tyco entered into a Tax Sharing Agreement that
governs the rights and obligations of each party with respect to certain pre-Separation income tax liabilities. More specifically, Tyco, Covidien and Tyco Electronics share 27%, 42% and
31%, respectively, of shared income tax liabilities that arise from adjustments made by tax authorities to Tyco's, Covidien's and Tyco Electronics' U.S. and certain non-U.S. income tax returns. All
costs and expenses associated with the management of these shared tax liabilities are shared equally among the parties. Consistent with the sharing provisions of the Tax Sharing Agreement, Tyco had a
net receivable from Covidien and Tyco Electronics of $98 million and $126 million as of September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively. In addition, as of both
September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, Tyco had a recorded liability of $554 million representing the fair value of Tyco's obligations under the Tax Sharing Agreement.

Tyco
and its subsidiaries' income tax returns periodically are examined by various tax authorities. In connection with these examinations, tax authorities, including the IRS, have raised
issues and

proposed
tax adjustments. The Company is reviewing and contesting certain of the proposed tax adjustments. Amounts related to these tax adjustments and other tax contingencies and related interest
have been assessed as uncertain income tax positions and recorded as appropriate.

For
a detailed discussion of contingencies related to Tyco's income taxes, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

During the fourth quarter of 2009, we approved a plan to sell a business in our ADT Worldwide segment. This business has been
classified as held for sale; however, its results of operations are presented in continuing operations as the criteria for discontinued operations have not been met. We have assessed and determined
that the carrying value of this business is recoverable and will continue to assess recoverability based on current fair value, less cost to sell, until the business is sold. Fair value used for the
impairment assessment was based on existing market conditions. We expect to complete the sale during fiscal 2010.

During
the third quarter of 2008, we approved a plan to sell a business in the Safety Products segment. This business had been classified as held for sale in our historical Consolidated
Balance Sheets. During the second quarter of 2009, due to a change in strategy by management, we decided not to sell the business. As a result, the business no longer satisfied the requirements to be
classified as held for sale in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 27, 2009. Accordingly, the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 26, 2008 was recast to reclassify the
business from held for sale to held and used. We measured the business at the lower of its (i) carrying amount before it was classified as held for sale, adjusted for depreciation and
amortization expense that would have been recognized had the business been continuously classified as held and used, or (ii) fair value at the date the decision not to sell was made. We
recorded a charge of $8 million in the second quarter of 2009 relating to the amount of depreciation and amortization expense that would have been recorded had the asset been continuously
classified as held and used.

Discontinued Operations

As previously reported in our periodic filings, in July 2008, we substantially completed the sale of our Infrastructure Services
business, which met the criteria to be presented as discontinued operations. In order to complete the sale of Earth Tech Brasil Ltda. ("ET Brasil") and Earth Tech UK businesses and certain
assets in China, we were required to obtain consents and approvals to transfer the legal ownership of the business and assets. On January 22, 2009, we received the necessary consents and
approvals to transfer the legal ownership of our ET Brasil business to Carioca Christiani-Nielsen Engenharia S.A. and received cash proceeds of $13 million. During the fourth quarter of
2008, we sold our Earth Tech UK business and received net cash proceeds of $53 million. However, the gain was deferred until receipt of the necessary consents and approvals. On May 12,
2009, we received the necessary consents and approvals to transfer the legal ownership of our Earth Tech UK business to AECOM Technologies Corporation ("AECOM") and realized the deferred gain in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations during the third quarter of 2009. Furthermore, on February 27, 2009, we received the necessary consents to transfer certain of the China assets and
received cash proceeds of $18 million. On May 8, 2009, we received the necessary consents to transfer additional China assets and received cash proceeds of $6 million. On
July 2, 2009 we received the necessary consents and approvals

to
transfer the remaining assets in China and received cash proceeds of $24 million. As a result of the fiscal 2009 dispositions, a net pre-tax gain of $33 million was
recorded in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended September 25, 2009.

During
2008, we sold our Empresa de Transmissao de Energia do Oeste Ltda. ("ETEO") business, Ancon Building Products ("Ancon") business, Nippon
Dry-Chemical Co., Ltd. ("NDC") business, and a European manufacturer of public address products and acoustic systems. As discussed above, we substantially completed the sale
of our Infrastructure Services Business, during the fourth quarter of 2008. These businesses met the held for sale and discontinued operations criteria and have been included in discontinued
operations in all periods presented.

In
May 2008, we sold 100% of the stock of ETEO, a Brazilian subsidiary of our Infrastructure Services business for $338 million of net cash proceeds and recorded a
pre-tax gain of $232 million, including the effects of the economic hedge of the purchase price discussed below. The gain was recorded in income from discontinued operations, net of
income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended September 26, 2008. ETEO was part of our Corporate and Other segment. During September 2007, we entered into an
economic hedge of the Brazilian Real denominated contractual sale price of the ETEO business. Since the hedging transaction was directly linked to the proceeds from the sale of a business that was
reflected in discontinued operations, we began including the impact of the hedge in discontinued operations during the first quarter of 2008. During the third quarter of 2008, we incurred a
pre-tax loss of $36 million on this hedge. The impact of the hedge in 2007 was not material.

Additionally
in fiscal year 2008, we settled a contract dispute arising under our former Infrastructure Services business. In connection with the settlement, we assessed our assets under
the original contract and concluded the assets were no longer recoverable, resulting in a $51 million charge to discontinued operations.

During
April 2008, we sold Ancon, a manufacturer of stainless steel products used in masonry construction. Ancon was part of our Corporate and Other segment. The sale was completed for
$164 million in net cash proceeds and a pre-tax gain of $100 million was recorded which was largely exempt from tax. The gain was recorded in income from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended September 26, 2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we received an additional
$6 million of proceeds related to the sale of Ancon.

During
February 2008, we sold NDC, a company in the Japanese fire protection industry. NDC was part of our Fire Protection Services and Safety Products segments. The sale was completed
for $50 million in net cash proceeds and a pre-tax gain of $7 million was recorded. The gain was recorded in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended September 26, 2008.

During
January 2008, we sold a European manufacturer of public address products and acoustic systems, which was part of our Fire Protection Services segment and recorded an
$8 million pre-tax loss on sale. The loss was recorded in income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During
the first quarter of 2007, Aquas Industriales de Jose, C.A. ("AIJ"), a joint venture that was majority owned by Infrastructure Services, was sold for $42 million in net
cash proceeds and a pre-tax gain of $19 million was recorded. The gain was recorded in discontinued operations, net of income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. AIJ
was part of our Corporate and Other segment.

During
the third quarter of 2007, we completed the Separation and have presented our Healthcare and Electronics businesses as discontinued operations in all periods presented.

In
each period prior to the Separation, net interest and loss on early extinguishment of debt, which is included in other expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations,
amounts were proportionally allocated to Covidien and Tyco Electronics based on the debt amounts that we believe were utilized by Covidien and Tyco Electronics historically inclusive of amounts
directly incurred. Allocated net interest was calculated using our historical weighted-average interest rate on debt including the impact of interest rate swap agreements. These allocated amounts were
included in discontinued operations. During 2007, allocated interest income, interest expense and other expense, net was $35 million, $242 million and $388 million, respectively.
During 2007, we incurred pre-tax separation costs related primarily to professional services and employee-related costs of $154 million and $289 million, respectively, in
discontinued operations.

Additionally,
the year ended September 28, 2007 includes tax charges related to the Separation primarily for the write-off of deferred tax assets that are no longer
realizable of $88 million in discontinued operations.

We
have used available information to develop our best estimates for certain assets and liabilities related to the Separation. In limited instances, final determination of the balances
will be made in subsequent periods. During the year ended September 28, 2007, $72 million was recorded through shareholders' equity, primarily related to a cash true-up adjustment of
$57 million and $15 million of other items. During the year ended September 26, 2008, $70 million of other items were recorded through shareholders' equity. During the year
ended September 25, 2009, $43 million was recorded through shareholders' equity, $9 million of which related to a pre-Separation income tax filing in a non-U.S. jurisdiction and
$34 million of other items. The other items discussed above, which aggregate $119 million, reflect immaterial adjustments to shareholders' equity which were recorded to correct the
distribution amount at the date of Separation. Adjustments in the future for the impact of filing final income tax returns in certain jurisdictions where those returns include a combination of our,
Covidien and/or Tyco Electronics legal entities and for certain amended income tax returns for the periods prior to the Separation may be recorded to either shareholders' equity or the Consolidated
Statements of Operations depending on the specific item giving rise to the adjustment.

During the year ended September 25, 2009, cash paid for acquisitions totaled $50 million, which primarily related to the
acquisition of Vue Technology, Inc., a provider of radio frequency identification ("RFID") technology, by our Safety Products segment.

During
the year ended September 26, 2008, cash paid for acquisitions totaled $401 million, which primarily related to the acquisition of Winner Security Services LLC
("Winner"), Sensormatic Security Corp. ("SSC") and First Service Security ("FirstService").

These
acquisitions were funded utilizing cash from operations. The results of operations of the acquired companies have been included in Tyco's consolidated results from the respective
acquisition dates. These acquisitions did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

For
a detailed discussion of acquisitions, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in making estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. The following accounting
policies are based on, among other things, judgments and assumptions made by management that include inherent risks and uncertainties. Management's estimates are based on the relevant information
available at the end of each period.

Depreciation and Amortization Methods for Security Monitoring-Related AssetsTyco generally considers assets related to the acquisition of new
customers in its electronic security business in three asset categories: internally generated residential subscriber systems, internally generated commercial subscriber systems (collectively referred
to as subscriber system assets) and customer accounts acquired through the ADT dealer program (referred to as dealer intangibles). Subscriber system assets include installed property, plant and
equipment for which Tyco retains ownership and deferred costs directly related to the customer acquisition and system installation. Subscriber system assets and any deferred revenue resulting from the
customer acquisition are accounted for over the expected life of the subscriber. In certain geographical areas where the Company has a large number of
customers that behave in a similar manner over time, the Company accounts for subscriber system assets and related deferred revenue using pools, with separate pools for the components of subscriber
system assets and any related deferred revenue based on the month and year of acquisition.

Effective
as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2007, Tyco changed the depreciation method and estimated useful life used to account for pooled subscriber system assets (primarily
in North America) and related deferred revenue from the straight-line method with lives ranging from 10 to 14 years to an accelerated method with lives up to 15 years. The
accelerated method utilizes declining balance rates based on geographical area ranging from 160% to 195% for residential subscriber pools and 145% to 265% for commercial subscriber pools and converts
to a straight-line methodology when the resulting depreciation charge is greater than that from the accelerated method. The Company will continue to use a straight-line method
with a 14-year life for non-pooled subscriber system assets (primarily in Europe and Asia) and related deferred revenue, with remaining balances written off upon customer
termination.

The
change in the method and estimated useful life used to account for pooled subscriber system assets and related deferred revenue resulted from our ongoing analysis of all pertinent
factors, including actual customer attrition data specific to customer categories and geographical areas, demand, competition, and the estimated technological life of the installed systems. The
pertinent factors have been influenced by management's ongoing customer retention programs, as well as tactical and strategic initiatives to improve service delivery, customer satisfaction, and the
credit worthiness of the subscriber customer base. All pertinent factors, including actual customer attrition data specific to customer categories and geographical areas, demand, competition, and the
estimated technological life of the installed systems, will continue to be reviewed by the Company at each balance sheet date to assess the continued appropriateness of methods and estimated useful
lives.

Effective
as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2007, Tyco also changed the estimated useful life of dealer intangibles in geographical areas comprising approximately 90% of the
net carrying value of dealer intangibles from 12 to 15 years. The Company continues to amortize dealer intangible assets on an accelerated basis. The change in the estimated useful life used to
account for dealer intangibles resulted from our ongoing analysis of all pertinent factors, including actual customer attrition data, demand, competition, and the estimated technological life of the
installed systems. The pertinent factors have been influenced by management's ongoing customer retention programs, as well as tactical and strategic initiatives to improve service delivery, customer
satisfaction, and the credit worthiness of the subscriber customer base.

Attrition
rates for customers in our ADT Worldwide business were 13.4%, 12.9% and 12.3% on a trailing 12-month basis for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Revenue RecognitionContract sales for the installation of fire protection systems, large security intruder systems and other construction-related
projects are recorded primarily under the percentage-of-completion method. Profits recognized on contracts in process are based upon estimated contract revenue and related
total cost of the project at completion. The risk of this methodology is its dependence upon estimates of costs at completion, which are subject to the uncertainties inherent in long-term
contracts. Revisions to cost estimates as contracts progress have the effect of increasing or decreasing profits each period. Provisions for anticipated losses are made in the period in which they
become determinable. If estimates are inaccurate, there is risk that our revenue and profits for the period may be overstated or understated.

Product
discounts granted are based on the terms of arrangements with direct, indirect and other market participants. Rebates are estimated based on sales terms, historical experience
and trend analysis.

Loss ContingenciesAccruals are recorded for various contingencies including legal proceedings, self-insurance and other claims that arise
in the normal course of business. The accruals are based on judgment, the probability of losses and, where applicable, the consideration of opinions of internal and/or external legal counsel and
actuarially determined estimates. Additionally, the Company records receivables from third party insurers when recovery has been determined to be probable.

Income TaxesIn determining income for financial statement purposes, we must make certain estimates and judgments. These estimates and judgments
affect the calculation of certain tax liabilities and the determination of the recoverability of certain of the deferred tax assets, which arise from temporary differences between the tax and
financial statement recognition of revenue and expense.

In
evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets we consider all available positive and negative evidence including our past operating results, the existence of cumulative
losses in the most recent years and our forecast of future taxable income. In estimating future taxable income, we develop assumptions including the amount of future pre-tax operating income, the
reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income
and are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses.

We
currently have recorded significant valuation allowances that we intend to maintain until it is more-likely-than-not the deferred tax assets will be realized. Our income tax expense
recorded in the
future may be reduced to the extent of decreases in our valuation allowances. The realization of our remaining deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on future taxable income in the appropriate
jurisdiction. Any reduction in future taxable income including but not limited to any future restructuring activities may require that we record an additional valuation allowance against our deferred
tax assets. An increase in the valuation allowance could result in additional income tax expense in such period and could have a significant impact on our future earnings.

Changes
in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is not currently aware of any such changes that would have a
material effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In
addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global
operations. We recognize potential liabilities and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to
which, additional taxes will be due. These tax liabilities are reflected net of related tax loss carryforwards. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances; however, due to
the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. If our estimate of tax
liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, an additional charge to expense would result. If payment of these amounts ultimately

proves
to be less than the recorded amounts, the reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset ImpairmentsGoodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment annually and
more frequently if triggering events occur. In performing these assessments, management relies on various factors, including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future
cash flows, comparable transactions and other market data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors which require judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. Since judgment is involved in performing fair value measurements used in goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment analyses, there
is risk that the carrying values of our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets may be overstated.

We
elected to make the first day of the fourth quarter the annual impairment assessment date for all goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. In the first step of the goodwill
impairment test, the Company compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Fair value for the goodwill impairment test is determined utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis
based on the Company's future budgets discounted using the market participants' weighted-average cost of capital and market indicators of terminal year cash flows. Other valuation methods are used to
corroborate the
discounted cash flow method. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered potentially impaired and further tests are performed to measure the amount of
impairment loss. In the second step of the goodwill impairment test, the Company compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill.
If the carrying amount of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying amount of
goodwill over its implied fair value. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner that the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. The Company
allocates the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, including intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Any
excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities represents the implied fair value of goodwill.

Long-Lived AssetsAssets held and used by the Company, including property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be fully recoverable. Tyco performs undiscounted operating cash flow
analyses to determine if impairment exists. For purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment for assets held for use, Tyco groups assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which cash
flows are separately identified. If an impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. Impairments to long-lived assets to be disposed of
are recorded based upon the fair value less cost to sell of the applicable assets. The calculation of the fair value of long-lived assets is based on assumptions concerning the amount and
timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates, reflecting varying degrees of perceived risk. Since judgment is involved in determining the fair value and useful lives of
long-lived assets, there is a risk that the carrying value of our long-lived assets may be overstated or understated.

Pension and Postretirement BenefitsOur pension expense and obligations are developed from actuarial valuations. Two critical assumptions in
determining pension expense and obligations are the discount rate and expected long-term return on plan assets. We evaluate these assumptions at least annually. Other assumptions reflect
demographic factors such as retirement, mortality and turnover and are evaluated periodically and updated to reflect our actual experience. Actual results may differ from actuarial assumptions. The
discount rate represents the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments and is used to calculate the present value of the expected future cash flows for benefit obligations
under our pension plans. A decrease in the discount rate increases the present value of

pension
benefit obligations. A 25 basis point decrease in the discount rate would increase our present value of pension obligations by approximately $77 million. We consider the current and
expected asset allocations of our pension plans, as well as historical and expected long-term rates of return on those types of plan assets, in determining the expected
long-term return on
plan assets. A 50 basis point decrease in the expected long-term return on plan assets would increase our pension expense by approximately $7 million. For fiscal 2010, we expect
that recent declines in interest rates will increase our pension expense, but is not expected to materially increase required contributions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On September 30, 2009, Tyco International Finance S.A. ("TIFSA") issued $500 million aggregate principle amount of 4.125%
notes due 2014 (the "2014 notes"), which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company. TIFSA received net proceeds of approximately $496 million after underwriting discounts and
estimated offering expenses.

On
January 9, 2009, TIFSA issued $750 million aggregate principle amount of 8.5% notes due on January 15, 2019, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the
Company (the "2019 notes"). Additionally, the holders of the 2019 notes have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the 2019 Notes on July 15, 2014 at a purchase
price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes tendered, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Otherwise, the 2019 notes mature on January 15, 2019. TIFSA received net proceeds of
approximately $745 million after underwriting discounts and offering expenses.

The
net proceeds of the aforementioned offerings may be used for general corporate purposes, which may include repayment of indebtedness, acquisitions, additions to working capital,
repurchase of common shares, capital expenditures and investments in the Company's subsidiaries.

In
January 2009, TIFSA made a payment of $215 million to extinguish all of its 6.125% notes due 2009. Additionally, in November 2008, TIFSA made a payment of $300 million
to extinguish all of its 6.125% notes due 2008.

Additionally,
in January 2009, we repaid the entire outstanding balance of $686 million on our revolving credit facilities. As of September 25, 2009, there were no amounts
drawn under our revolving credit facilities. As of September 25, 2009, the aggregate available commitment under our senior revolving credit facilities was $1.69 billion,
$200 million of which was dedicated to backstop all of our commercial paper outstanding as of such date. We continually monitor developments regarding the availability of funds under our
revolving credit facilities. Although there is some risk that financial institutions will fail to perform their contractual obligations, particularly in times of credit market distress, we believe
that the lenders under our revolving credit facilities are capable of meeting any borrowing requests we may make for the foreseeable future.

As
discussed above, as of September 25, 2009, we had $200 million of commercial paper outstanding. We continue to experience increased availability within the commercial
paper markets. Our multi-year revolving credit facilities serve as a backstop to our commercial paper program.

In
addition to our available cash and operating cash flows, additional sources of potential liquidity include committed credit lines, our commercial paper program, public debt and equity
markets as well as the ability to sell trade accounts receivable. We continue to balance our operating, investing and financing uses of cash through investment in our existing core businesses,
strategic acquisitions and divestitures, dividends and share repurchases. We believe our cash position, amounts available under our credit facilities and cash provided by operating activities will be
adequate to cover our operational and business needs.

As
a result of recent declines in interest rates during 2009, pension costs may increase in fiscal 2010. We will continue to monitor market conditions and assess the impact, if any, on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Approximately 100% of our U.S. and more than 95% of our non-U.S. funded pension plans are invested in marketable investments,
including publicly-traded

equity
and fixed income securities. Although we do not believe we will be required to make materially higher cash contributions in the next 12 months, if market conditions worsen, we may be
required to make incremental cash contributions under local statutory law.

The
sources of our cash flow from operating activities and the use of a portion of that cash in our operations for the years ended September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008
and September 28, 2007 were as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

2007

Cash flows from operating activities:

Operating (loss) income

$

(1,487

)

$

1,941

$

(1,732

)

Goodwill and intangible asset impairments

2,705

10

59

Non-cash restructuring and asset impairment charges, net

23

36

11

Losses on divestitures

13



4

Depreciation and amortization(1)

1,133

1,154

1,148

Non-cash compensation expense

103

99

173

Deferred income taxes

(83

)

(94

)

(16

)

Provision for losses on accounts receivable and inventory

156

135

94

(Gain) loss on the retirement of debt

(2

)

258

259

Other, net

61

(124

)

(231

)

Class action settlement liability



(3,020

)

2,992

Net change in working capital

142

(646

)

(414

)

Interest income

44

110

104

Interest expense

(301

)

(396

)

(313

)

Income tax expense

(78

)

(335

)

(324

)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$

2,429

$

(872

)

$

1,814

Other cash flow items:

Capital expenditures, net(2)

$

(696

)

$

(706

)

$

(643

)

Decrease in sale of accounts receivable

10

14

7

Accounts purchased from ADT dealer program

(543

)

(376

)

(409

)

Purchase accounting and holdback liabilities

(2

)

(2

)

(10

)

Voluntary pension contributions

22

4

23

(1)

Includes
depreciation expense of $617 million, $626 million and $635 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
amortization of intangible assets of $516 million, $528 million and $513 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(2)

Includes
net proceeds of $13 million, $28 million and $23 million received for the sale/disposition of property, plant
and equipment in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The net change in working capital increased operating cash flow by $142 million in 2009. The components of this change are set forth in
detail in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The significant changes in working capital included a $367 million decrease in inventory, a $207 million decrease in accounts
receivable, a $106 million decrease in contracts in progress, offset by a $352 million decrease in accounts payable and a $148 million decrease in income taxes, net.

During
2009, we completed the sale of all of our remaining Infrastructure Services businesses for net cash proceeds of $66 million.

We
continue to fund capital expenditures to grow our business, improve the cost structure of our businesses, to invest in new processes and technology, and to maintain high quality
production standards. The level of capital expenditures in 2010 is expected to exceed spending levels in 2009 and is also expected to exceed depreciation.

During
2009, 2008 and 2007 we paid out $154 million, $187 million and $70 million, respectively, in cash related to restructuring activities. See Note 3 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our restructuring activities.

Income
taxes paid, net of refunds, related to continuing operations was $291 million, $501 million, and $649 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

During
2009, 2008 and 2007, Tyco paid $543 million, $376 million and $409 million of cash, respectively, to acquire approximately 512,000, 370,000 and 415,000
customer contracts for electronic security services through the ADT dealer program.

As
previously discussed, effective June 29, 2007, we completed the Separation. In connection with the Separation, we paid $68 million and $349 million in Separation
costs during 2008 and 2007 respectively. Of these amounts, $36 million and $256 million were included in cash flows from discontinued operating activities, respectively.

During
the second quarter of 2008, Tyco released $2,960 million of funds placed in escrow during the third quarter of 2007 as well as $60 million of interest earned on
those funds for the benefit of the class as stipulated in the Court's final order related to the class action settlement.

We
will continue to divest businesses that do not align with our overall strategy. We expect to use the proceeds from these sales, as well as the cash generated by our operations, to
continue to make investments in our businesses that are intended to grow revenue and improve productivity, including our restructuring actions. We expect to also use cash to selectively pursue
acquisitions.

Pursuant
to our share repurchase program, we may repurchase Tyco shares from time to time in open market purchases at prevailing market prices, in negotiated transactions off the market,
or pursuant to an approved 10b5-1 trading plan in accordance with applicable regulations.

Management
believes that cash generated by or available to us should be sufficient to fund our capital and liquidity needs for the foreseeable future, including quarterly dividend
payments. We intend to continue to repurchase shares under our existing $1.0 billion share repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors on July 10, 2008 depending on credit
market conditions, macroeconomic factors and expectations regarding future cash flows.

Shareholders' equity was $12.9 billion or $27.30 per share, as of September 25, 2009, compared to $15.5 billion or
$32.76 per share, as of September 26, 2008. Shareholders' equity decreased primarily due to a net loss of $1.8 billion, which was primarily driven by goodwill and intangible asset
impairments, dividends declared of $472 million, a $220 million current period change relating to the Company's retirement plans and unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange
rates of $203 million.

Total
debt was $4.3 billion as of September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively. Total debt as a percentage of capitalization (total debt and shareholders'
equity) was 25% as of September 25, 2009 and 22% as of September 26, 2008, respectively.

Our
cash balance increased to $2.4 billion as of September 25, 2009, as compared to $1.5 billion as of September 26, 2008. This increase in cash was primarily
due to cash generated by the operating segments as well as proceeds from issuance of long-term debt.

In connection with the settlement of litigation arising from the Separation related to our public debt, on June 3, 2008 we,
along with our finance subsidiary TIFSA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and successor company to Tyco International Group S.A. ("TIGSA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
organized under the laws of Luxembourg, consummated consent solicitations and exchange offers related to certain series of debt issued under our 1998 and 2003 indentures. In connection with the
exchange offers, we issued $422 million principal amount of 7.0% notes due 2019 in exchange for an equal principal amount of 7.0% notes due 2028 and $707 million principal amount of
6.875% notes due 2021 in exchange for an equal principal amount of 6.875% notes due 2029. In connection with the consent solicitations, holders of our 6.0% notes due 2013, 6.125% notes due 2008,
6.125% notes due 2009, 6.75% notes due 2011, 6.375% notes due 2011, 7.0% notes due 2028 and 6.875% notes due 2029 collectively received consent payments totaling $250 million.

The
terms of the consent and exchange offers were evaluated as a debt modification in accordance with the authoritative guidance for debtor's accounting for a modification or exchange of
debt instruments, and it was determined that the 7.0% notes due 2028 and the 6.875% notes due 2029 were extinguished because the cash flows of the new bonds as compared to the original bonds were
substantially modified. As a result, the new bonds and the 7.0% notes due 2028 and the 6.875% notes due 2029 that were not
tendered for exchange were recorded at their fair value upon completion of the exchange offers. In determining fair value, we measured the bonds as if they were an initial issuance to the public. This
was done by obtaining effective yield data derived from comparable pricing received from the issuance of bonds with similar ratings and covenants by large public companies.

During
the year ended September 26, 2008, in connection with the consent solicitations and exchange offers, we recorded a $222 million charge to other expense, net as a
loss on extinguishment of debt. This charge was comprised of the consent payments related to the extinguished bonds (notes due 2028 and 2029), premium on the exchanged bonds which represents the
difference between the fair value and the book value of the extinguished bonds, and the write-off of the original unamortized debt issuance costs, as well as fees paid to third-parties
associated with the bonds that were not deemed extinguished. The remaining portion of the consent payment and issuance costs will be amortized over the remaining life of the bonds.

During
the year ended September 28, 2007, we recorded a $259 million charge to other expense, net for the loss on early extinguishment of debt related to the debt tender
offers in connection with the Separation.

On June 24, 2008, Tyco and TIFSA entered into a $500 million senior unsecured revolving credit agreement with Citibank,
N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders party thereto. This credit agreement has a three-year term. Borrowings under this agreement have a variable interest rate based on LIBOR or an
alternate base rate. The margin over LIBOR can vary based on changes in our credit rating and facility utilization. Together with our $1.19 billion five-year senior revolving credit
agreement, dated as of April 25, 2007, our total committed revolving credit line was $1.69 billion as of September 25, 2009. These revolving credit facilities may be used for
working capital, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes. As of September 25, 2009, there were no amounts drawn under these facilities, although we had dedicated $200 million
of availability to backstop outstanding commercial paper. As discussed above, we believe that all of the lenders under our revolving credit facility are capable of meeting any borrowing requests TIFSA
may make.

customary
covenants including limits on negative pledges, subsidiary debt and sale/leaseback transactions. None of these covenants are considered restrictive to our business.

The
following tables detail our long-term and short-term debt ratings as of September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008:

Long-Term Debt Ratings

2009

2008

Moody's

Baa1

Baa1

Standard & Poor's

BBB+

BBB+

Fitch

BBB+

BBB+

Short-Term Debt Ratings

2009

2008

Moody's

P-2

P-2

Standard & Poor's

A-2

A-2

Fitch

F2

F2

The security ratings set forth above are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal by the assigning rating
organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

Contractual obligations and commitments for principal debt, minimum lease payment obligations under non-cancelable
operating leases and other obligations as of September 25, 2009 is as follows ($ in millions):

Purchase
obligations consist of commitments for purchases of good and services.

(5)

Other
long-term liabilities primarily consist of the following: pension and postretirement costs, income taxes, warranties and environmental
liabilities and are excluded from this table. We are unable to estimate the timing of payment for these items due to the inherent uncertainties of obligations of this type. The minimum required
contributions to our pension plans are expected to be approximately $80 million in 2010 and we expect to pay $7 million in 2010 related to postretirement benefit plans.

(6)

As
of September 25, 2009, we recorded gross unrecognized tax benefits of $284 million and gross interest and penalties of $50 million,
both of which are classified as non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as payment is not expected within one year. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably
reliable estimate of the timing for such payments in future years; therefore, such amounts have been excluded from the above contractual obligation table.

As discussed above, as of September 25, 2009, we had total commitments of $1.69 billion under our revolving credit facilities,
$500 million of which matures on June 24, 2011 and $1.19 billion of which matures on April 25, 2012. As of September 25, 2009, there were no amounts drawn under our
revolving credit facilities. As of September 25, 2009, the aggregate available commitment under our senior revolving credit facilities was $1.69 billion, $200 million of which was
dedicated to backstop all of our commercial paper outstanding as of such date.

In
May 2008, TIFSA commenced issuing commercial paper to U.S. institutional accredited investors and qualified institutional buyers. Borrowings under the commercial paper program are
available for general corporate purposes. As of September 25, 2009, TIFSA had $200 million of commercial paper outstanding which bore interest at an average rate of 0.33%.

As
of September 25, 2009, we classified the outstanding commercial paper balance of $200 million as short-term as we intend to repay such amount during the next
twelve months. As of September 26, 2008, we classified $116 million of short-term commercial paper as long-term as settlement of the amount outstanding was not
expected to require the use of working capital in the next twelve months as we had both the intent and the ability to refinance this debt on a long-term basis.

As
of September 25, 2009, we had total outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees of $659 million.

In
the normal course of business, we are liable for contract completion and product performance. In the opinion of management, such obligations will not significantly affect our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
connection with the Separation, we entered into a liability sharing agreement regarding certain actions that were pending against Tyco prior to the Separation. Under the Separation
and Distribution Agreement and Tax Sharing Agreement, we have assumed 27%, Covidien has assumed 42% and Tyco Electronics has assumed 31% of certain Tyco pre-Separation contingent and other
corporate liabilities, which include certain outstanding legacy and tax contingencies and any actions with respect to the spin-offs or the distributions made or brought by any third party.
Any amounts relating to these contingent and other corporate liabilities paid by Tyco after the spin-offs that are subject to the allocation provisions of the Separation and Distribution
Agreement or Tax Sharing Agreement will be shared among Tyco, Covidien and Tyco Electronics pursuant to the same allocation ratio.

For a discussion of contingencies related to Tyco's legacy securities litigation and various legal matters, see Item 3. Legal
ProceedingsClass Action Settlement and Legacy Securities Matters. Adverse outcomes in certain actions to which we are a party could have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.

Tyco is involved in various stages of investigation and cleanup related to environmental remediation matters at a number of sites. For
a detailed discussion of contingencies
related to Tyco's environmental matters, see Item 1. BusinessEnvironmental Matters and Item 3. Legal ProceedingsEnvironmental Matters.

Tyco and certain of its subsidiaries are named as defendants in bodily injury lawsuits based on alleged exposure to asbestos-containing
materials. For a detailed discussion of Tyco's contingencies related to asbestos-related matters, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Tyco and its subsidiaries' income tax returns periodically are examined by various tax authorities. In connection with these
examinations, tax authorities, including the IRS, have raised issues and proposed tax adjustments. The Company is reviewing and contesting certain of the proposed tax adjustments. Amounts related to
these tax adjustments and other tax contingencies and related interest have been assessed as uncertain income tax positions and recorded as appropriate. For a detailed discussion of contingencies
related to Tyco's income taxes, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Tyco has received and responded to various allegations and other information that improper activities were conducted by Tyco employees
in recent years, in particular with respect to DOJ and SEC investigations that have resulted in our performing a Company-wide baseline review of our policies, controls and practices as
they relate to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. For a detailed discussion of these contingencies and others related to Tyco's compliance efforts, see Item 3. Legal
ProceedingsCompliance Matters.

The Company is a defendant in a number of other pending legal proceedings incidental to present and former operations, acquisitions and
dispositions. The Company does not expect the outcome of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.

As of September 25, 2009, we had a backlog of unfilled orders of $9.0 billion, compared to a backlog of
$9.6 billion as of September 26, 2008. We expect that approximately 86% of our backlog as of September 25, 2009 will be filled during 2010. Backlog by segment as of
September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008 is as follows ($ in millions):

2009

2008

ADT Worldwide

$

5,908

$

5,917

Flow Control

1,698

2,083

Fire Protection Services

1,169

1,314

Electrical and Metal Products

72

117

Safety Products

114

154

$

8,961

$

9,585

Backlog
decreased by $624 million, or 6.5%, from $9.6 billion as of September 26, 2008 to $9.0 billion as of September 25, 2009. Unfavorable changes in
foreign currency exchange rates resulted in a decrease of $87 million. ADT Worldwide's backlog decreased by $9 million, or 0.2%, as of September 25, 2009. The decrease was
primarily due to unfavorable exchange rates of $83 million partially offset by an increase in net bookings of $74 million. ADT Worldwide's total account base grew 2.9% during 2009 to
7.4 million accounts. The amount of recurring revenue-in-force as of September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008 was $4.0 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively. The
increase in recurring revenue-in-force was primarily the result of the increase in the account base discussed above partially offset by unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Recurring revenue-in-force represents 12 months' fees for monitoring and maintenance services under contract in the security business. Flow Control's backlog decreased
by $385 million primarily due to decreased bookings of $398 million offset by favorable exchange rates of $13 million. Fire Protection Services

Certain of Tyco's international businesses utilize the sale of accounts receivable as short-term financing mechanisms. The
aggregate amount outstanding under the Company's remaining international accounts receivable programs was $55 million, $65 million and $76 million as of September 25, 2009,
September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.

Certain of our business segments have guaranteed the performance of third-parties and provided financial guarantees for uncompleted
work and financial commitments. The terms of these guarantees vary with end dates ranging from 2009 through the completion of such
transactions. The guarantees would typically be triggered in the event of nonperformance and performance under the guarantees, if required, would not have a material effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.

There
are certain guarantees or indemnifications extended among Tyco, Covidien and Tyco Electronics in accordance with the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement and the Tax
Sharing Agreement. The guarantees primarily relate to certain contingent tax liabilities included in the Tax Sharing Agreement. At the time of the Separation, we recorded a liability necessary to
recognize the fair value of such guarantees and indemnifications. In the absence of observable transactions for identical or similar guarantees, we determined the fair value of these guarantees and
indemnifications utilizing expected present value measurement techniques. Significant assumptions utilized to determine fair value included determining a range of potential outcomes, assigning a
probability weighting to each potential outcome and estimating the anticipated timing of resolution. The probability weighted outcomes were discounted using our incremental borrowing rate. The
liability necessary to reflect the fair value of the guarantees and indemnifications under the Tax Sharing Agreement is $554 million, which is included in other liabilities on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008. The guarantees primarily relate to certain contingent tax liabilities included in the Tax Sharing Agreement. See
Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Tax Sharing Agreement.

In
addition, we historically provided support in the form of financial and/or performance guarantees to various Covidien and Tyco Electronics operating entities. In connection with the
Separation, we worked with the guarantee counterparties to cancel or assign these guarantees to Covidien or Tyco Electronics. To the extent these guarantees were not assigned prior to the Separation
date, we assumed primary liability on any remaining such support. The estimated fair value of these obligations is $4 million and $7 million, which are included in other liabilities on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, respectively, with an offset to shareholders' equity on the Separation date.

In
disposing of assets or businesses, we often provide representations, warranties and/or indemnities to cover various risks including, for example, unknown damage to the assets,
environmental risks involved in the sale of real estate, liability to investigate and remediate environmental contamination at waste disposal sites and manufacturing facilities, and unidentified tax
liabilities and legal fees related to periods prior to disposition. We have no reason to believe that these uncertainties would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

We
have recorded liabilities for known indemnifications included as part of environmental liabilities. See Item 1. BusinessEnvironmental Matters and Note 15 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of these liabilities.

In
the normal course of business, we are liable for contract completion and product performance. In the opinion of management, such obligations will not significantly affect our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

As
of September 25, 2009, we had total outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees of $659 million.

We
record estimated product warranty costs at the time of sale. For further information on estimated product warranty, see Notes 1 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In
2001, a division of Safety Products initiated a Voluntary Replacement Program ("VRP") associated with the acquisition of Central Sprinkler. The VRP relates to the replacement of
certain O-ring seal sprinkler heads which were originally manufactured by Central Sprinkler prior to Tyco's acquisition. Under this program, the sprinkler heads are being replaced free of
charge to property owners. On May 1, 2007, we, along with the Consumer Products Safety Commission announced an August 31, 2007 deadline for filing claims to participate in the VRP. We
will fulfill all valid claims for replacement of qualifying sprinklers received up to August 31, 2007. Settlements during 2009, 2008 and 2007 include cash expenditures of $33 million,
$49 million and $38 million, respectively, related to the VRP. The Company believes the remaining liability represents our best estimate of the cost required to complete the VRP as of
September 25, 2009, which is not material.

Recently Adopted Accounting PronouncementsIn June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued authoritative guidance which
established the FASB Standards Accounting Codification ("Codification") as the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities, and rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all the existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards upon its effective date and,
subsequently, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. The guidance is not intended to change or alter existing
GAAP. The guidance became effective for Tyco in the fourth quarter of 2009. The guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. All references
to previous numbering of FASB Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts have been removed from the financial statements and accompanying footnotes.

In
May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for subsequent events. The guidance provides authoritative accounting literature related to evaluating subsequent events that was
previously addressed only in the auditing literature. The guidance is similar to the current guidance with some exceptions that are not intended to result in significant change to current practice.
The guidance defines subsequent events and also requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. The Company adopted the
disclosure provisions of the guidance as of June 26, 2009. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, which amended existing guidance. The guidance requires
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of the guidance as of
June 26, 2009. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the adoption of the guidance. The adoption did not have an impact on the
Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
March 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. The guidance is intended to improve financial reporting about
derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity's results of operations. The Company adopted the
disclosure provisions of the guidance as of December 27, 2008. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the adoption of the guidance.
The adoption did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
February 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance permits an entity, on a
contract-by-contract basis, to make an irrevocable election to account for certain types of financial instruments and warranty and insurance contracts at fair value, rather
than historical cost, with changes in the fair value, whether realized or unrealized, recognized in earnings. The guidance became effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2009 at which time
the Company did not elect the fair value option for eligible items.

In
September 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The guidance
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which permits
companies to partially defer the effective date of the guidance for one year for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
nonrecurring basis. During the first quarter of 2009 the Company elected to defer the adoption of the guidance for one year for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis which is effective for Tyco in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, on a

prospective
basis. The guidance became effective for Tyco in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 for financial assets and liabilities only. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the adoption of the guidance.

In
September 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for employers' accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The guidance requires that employers
recognize the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans as a net asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognize as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as a component of net periodic
benefit cost. The Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of the guidance as of September 28, 2007.

The
guidance also requires companies to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of their fiscal year end. The Company adopted the measurement date provisions of the guidance on
September 27, 2008. As a result, Tyco measured its plan assets and benefit obligations on September 26, 2008 and adjusted its opening balances of accumulated (deficit) earnings and
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the change in net periodic benefit cost and fair value, respectively, from the previously used measurement date of August 31, 2008. The
adoption of the measurement date provisions resulted in a net decrease to accumulated (deficit) earnings of $5 million, net of an income tax benefit of $2 million, and a net increase to
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income of $61 million, net of income taxes of $28 million for 2009. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information related to the adoption of the guidance.

Recently Issued Accounting PronouncementsIn September 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for the accounting for revenue arrangements with
multiple deliverables. The guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on
vendor-specific objective evidence if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific evidence nor
third-party evidence is available. The guidance requires arrangements under which multiple revenue generating activities to be performed be allocated at
inception. The residual method under the existing accounting guidance has been eliminated. The guidance expands the disclosure requirements related to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The
guidance becomes effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning in fiscal 2011, with early adoption permitted. The guidance applies on a prospective basis unless the
Company specifically elects to apply the guidance retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing what impact, if any, the guidance will have on its financial position, results of operations or
cash flows, as well as the timing of its adoption of the guidance.

In
June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amended the existing guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities, to address the elimination of the concept of
a qualifying special purpose entity. The guidance also replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity, and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the
right to receive benefits from the entity. Additionally, the guidance requires any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity to provide enhanced disclosures that will
provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise's involvement in a variable interest entity. The guidance is effective for Tyco in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011. The Company is currently assessing what impact, if any, that the guidance will have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
December 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for employers' disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. The guidance requires additional disclosures about plan
assets related to an employer's defined benefit pension or other post-retirement plans to enable investors to

better
understand how investment decisions are made, the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the effect of fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on changes in plan assets for the period, and the significant concentrations of risk within plan assets. The disclosure provisions
of the guidance are effective for Tyco in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

In
June 2008, the FASB ratified authoritative guidance for determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities. The guidance
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment awards are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, must be included in the earnings allocation in calculating earnings
per share under the two-class method. The guidance requires that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend-equivalents be
treated as participating securities in calculating earnings per share. The guidance is effective for Tyco starting with the first quarter of fiscal 2010, and shall be applied retrospectively to all
prior periods. The Company believes that the guidance will not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
April 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for determining the useful life of intangible assets. The guidance amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The guidance is effective for Tyco in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company has determined
that the guidance will not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In
December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for business combinations. The revised guidance retains the underlying concepts of the existing guidance in that business
combinations are still accounted for at fair value. However, the accounting for certain other aspects of business combinations will be affected. Acquisition costs will generally be expensed as
incurred. Restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date. In-process research and development will be recorded at
fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible at the acquisition date until it is completed or abandoned and its useful life can be determined. Changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and
uncertain tax positions after the acquisition date will generally impact income tax expense. The revised guidance also expands required disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of
business combinations. The revised guidance is effective, on a prospective basis, for Tyco in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

In
December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. The guidance requires the recognition of a noncontrolling
interest (minority interest prior to the adoption of the guidance) as equity in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest should be
included in consolidated net income on the face of the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The guidance also amends certain existing consolidation procedures in order to achieve consistency with
the requirements of the revised authoritative guidance for business combinations discussed above. The guidance also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and
its noncontrolling interest. This guidance is effective for Tyco in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The implementation of the guidance will not have a material impact on the Company's financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.

Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements in this report are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words "anticipate,"
"believe," "expect," "estimate," "project" and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement contained herein, in press releases,
written statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), or in Tyco's communications and discussions with investors and analysts in the

normal
course of business through meetings, web casts, phone calls and conference calls, regarding expectations with respect to sales, earnings, cash flows, operating efficiencies, product expansion,
backlog, the consummation and benefits of acquisitions and divestitures, as well as financings and repurchases of debt or equity securities, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
contingencies. Many of these risks, uncertainties and contingencies are beyond our control, and may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated results,
performance or achievements. Factors that might affect such forward-looking statements include, among other things:

results and consequences of Tyco's internal investigation and governmental investigations concerning the Company's
governance, management, internal controls and operations including its business operations outside the United States;



the outcome of litigation and governmental proceedings;



effect of income tax audit settlements;



our ability to repay or refinance our outstanding indebtedness as it matures;



our ability to operate within the limitations imposed by financing arrangements and to maintain our credit ratings;

risks associated with the change in our jurisdiction of incorporation from Bermuda to Switzerland, including the
possibility of reduced flexibility with respect to certain aspects of capital management, increased or different regulatory burdens, and the possibility that we may not realize anticipated tax
benefits;



changes in U.S. and non-U.S. governmental laws and regulations; and



the possible effects on Tyco of future legislation in the United States that may limit or eliminate potential U.S. tax
benefits resulting from Tyco's jurisdiction of incorporation or deny U.S. government contracts to Tyco based upon its jurisdiction of incorporation.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of conducting business, we are exposed to certain risks associated with potential changes in market conditions.
These risks include fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Accordingly, we have established a comprehensive risk

management
process to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal exposures we believe we are subject to. We seek to manage these risks through the use of financial derivative instruments. Our
portfolio of derivative financial instruments may, from time to time, include forward foreign currency exchange contracts, foreign currency options, interest rate swaps and forward commodity
contracts. Derivative financial instruments related to interest rate sensitivity of debt obligations, intercompany cross border transactions and anticipated non-functional currency cash
flows are used with the goal of mitigating a significant portion of these exposures when it is cost effective to do so.

We
do not execute transactions or utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Further, to reduce the risk that a counterparty will be unable to honor
its contractual obligations to us, we only enter into contracts with counterparties having at least an A-/A3 long-term debt rating. These counterparties are generally financial
institutions and there is no significant concentration of exposure with any one party.

We hedge our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates through the use of forward foreign currency exchange
contracts. During 2009, our largest exposures to foreign exchange rates existed primarily with the Swiss franc, British pound, Euro, Australian dollar and Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. The
market risk related to the forward foreign currency exchange contracts (excluding the dividend hedge contract discussed below) is measured by estimating the potential impact of a 10% change in the
value of the U.S. dollar relative to the local currency exchange rates. The rates used to perform this analysis were based on the market rates in effect on September 25, 2009. A 10%
appreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the local currency exchange rates would result in a $6 million net increase in the fair value of the contracts. Conversely, a 10% depreciation of the
U.S. dollar relative to the local currency exchange rates would result in a $7 million net decrease in the fair value of the contracts. However, gains or losses on these derivative instruments
are economically offset by the gains or losses on the underlying transactions.

Effective
March 17, 2009, Tyco changed its jurisdiction of incorporation from Bermuda to Switzerland. Until January 1, 2011 Tyco intends to make dividend payments in the
form of a reduction of capital denominated in Swiss francs. However, the Company expects to actually pay dividends in U.S. dollars, based on exchange rates in effect shortly before the payment date.
Fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar compared to the Swiss franc between the date the dividend is declared and paid will increase or decrease the U.S. dollar amount required to be paid. The Company manages the potential
variability in cash flows associated with the dividend payments by entering into derivative financial instruments used as economic hedges of the underlying risk. A 10% appreciation of the U.S. dollar
relative to the Swiss franc would result in a $20 million net decrease in the fair value of the contracts. Conversely, a 10% depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the Swiss franc would
result in a $24 million net increase in the fair value of the contracts. However, gains or losses on these derivative instruments are economically offset by the gains or losses on the
underlying transactions.

Previously,
we hedged our investment in certain foreign operations. In December 2006, due to required changes to the legal entity structure to facilitate the Separation, the Company
determined that it would no longer consider certain intercompany foreign currency transactions to be long-term investments. As a result, the related foreign currency transaction gains and
losses on such investments were recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations subsequent to this determination rather than in the currency translation component of accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income within shareholders' equity. Forward contracts that were previously designated as hedges of these net investments continued to be used to manage this exposure but were no
longer designated as net investment hedges.

During
fiscal 2009, we designated certain intercompany loans as permanent in nature. As of September 25, 2009, $3.0 billion of intercompany loans have been designated as
permanent in nature and for the year ended September 25, 2009, we recorded the cumulative translation loss through

Our long-term debt portfolio primarily consists of fixed-rate instruments. The Company manages its interest
rate risk through the use of interest rate swap transactions with financial institutions acting as principal counterparties, which were designated as fair value hedges for accounting purposes. During
2009, the Company entered into the interest rate swap transactions with the objective of managing the exposure to interest rate risk by converting the interest rates on $1.4 billion of
fixed-rate debt to variable rates. In these contracts, the Company agreed with financial institutions acting as principal counterparties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference
between fixed and floating interest amounts calculated on an agreed-upon notional principal amount. A 100 basis point increase in interest rates relative to interest rates as of
September 25, 2009 would result in a $22 million net decrease in the fair value of the contracts. Conversely, a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates relative to interest rates as
of September 25, 2009 would result in a $22 million net increase in the fair value of the contracts.

We are exposed to volatility in the prices of raw materials used in some of our products and may, in limited circumstances, enter into
hedging contracts to manage those exposures. These exposures are monitored as an integral part of our risk management program. During 2009, the Company did not hedge its exposure attributable to
changes in commodity prices but may consider such strategies in the future.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The following consolidated financial statements and schedule specified by this Item, together with the report thereon of
Deloitte & Touche LLP, are presented following Item 15 of this report:

Financial
Statements:

Management's
Responsibility for Financial Statements

Reports
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007

Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008

Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007

Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 25, 2009, September 26, 2008 and September 28, 2007

Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements

Financial
Statement Schedule:

Schedule IIValuation
and Qualifying Accounts

All
other financial statements and schedules have been omitted since the information required to be submitted has been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes
or because they are either not applicable or not required under the rules of Regulation S-X.

Information
on quarterly results of operations is set forth in Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.

Under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer
concluded that, as of September 25, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act
reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.

We
have made significant systems and process improvements in our tax accounting processes through fiscals 2008 and 2009 and in the fourth quarter of 2009, management conducted extensive
assessments of the effectiveness of the tax accounting and control procedures. After reviewing the results of these assessments, management concluded that internal controls relating to accounting for
income taxes are designed and operating effectively to prevent a material error from occurring or to assure that such an error would be detected and corrected in a timely manner.

There
were no other changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 25, 2009 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, these internal controls.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined under
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the Company's assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that the Company's receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company's management and directors and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 25, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control

Integrated Framework. Management's assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Based on our assessment and those
criteria, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal controls over financial reporting as of September 25, 2009.

A
material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. During 2007, management's procedures and testing identified errors that,
although not material to the Consolidated Financial Statements, led management to conclude that control deficiencies existed related to tax effecting consolidating entries, analysis and reconciliation
of taxes receivable and taxes payable in
non-U.S. jurisdictions, certain aspects of deferred taxes, and procedures with respect to classification of tax amounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result of these
deficiencies, it was reasonably possible that internal controls over financial reporting may not have prevented or detected errors from occurring that could have been material, either individually or
in the aggregate. Management accordingly concluded that internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as a result of a material weakness related to certain aspects of accounting for
income taxes as of September 28, 2007 and September 26, 2008. As of September 25, 2009, the Company has remediated the material weakness in income tax accounting as a result of
corrective actions taken in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009.

During
fiscal years 2008 and 2009, we have focused on our internal controls over accounting for income taxes, and have taken steps to strengthen controls in response to the identified
material weakness. Significant internal control, information systems and process improvements have been implemented in our tax accounting processes to enhance effectiveness and sustainability
including:

We
made the above improvements through 2008 and 2009 and in the fourth quarter of 2009, management concluded that the improved controls had been operating for a sufficient period of time
to allow the effectiveness of the remediation measures to be validated. We conducted extensive assessments of the effectiveness of the remediated tax accounting and control procedures. After reviewing
the results of these assessments, management concluded that internal controls relating to accounting for income taxes are designed and operating effectively to prevent a material error from occurring
or to assure that such an error would be detected and corrected in a timely manner.

Our
internal control over financial reporting as of September 25, 2009, has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm
that audited and reported on the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K, and their report is also included in this Form 10-K.

Information concerning Directors and Executive Officers may be found under the captions "Proposal Number OneElection of
Directors," "Committees of the Board of Directors," and "Executive Officers" in our definitive proxy statement for our 2010 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the "2010
Proxy Statement"), which will be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year. Such information is incorporated herein by reference. The information in the 2010
Proxy Statement set forth under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding shareholder communications with
our Board of Directors may be found under the caption "Communications with the Board of Directors" in our 2010 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

We have adopted the Tyco Guide to Ethical Conduct, which applies to all employees, officers and directors of Tyco. Our Guide to Ethical
Conduct meets the requirements of a "code of ethics" as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K and applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer, as well as all other employees. Our Guide to Ethical Conduct also meets the requirements of a code of business conduct and ethics under the listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. Our Guide to Ethical Conduct is posted on our website at www.tyco.com under the heading "Corporate
CitizenshipGovernance." We will also provide a copy of our Guide to Ethical Conduct to shareholders upon request. We disclose any amendments to our Guide to Ethical Conduct, as well as
any waivers for executive officers or directors, on our website.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information concerning executive compensation may be found under the captions "Executive Officer Compensation," "Compensation of
Non-Employee Directors," and "Governance of the Company" of our 2010 Proxy Statement. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

The information in our 2010 Proxy Statement set forth under the captions "Executive Officer Compensation" and "Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" is incorporated herein by reference.

The information in our 2010 Proxy Statement set forth under the captions "Governance of the Company" and "Committees of the Board" is
incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information in our 2010 Proxy Statement set forth under the captions "Proposal Number FiveElection of Auditors,"
"Audit and Non-Audit Fees" and "Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of the Independent
Auditors" is incorporated herein by reference.

Separation and Distribution Agreement by and among Tyco International Ltd., Covidien Ltd., and Tyco Electronics Ltd., dated June 29, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Tyco
International Ltd.'s current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).

3.1

Memorandum of Association of Tyco International Ltd. (Tyco International AG) (Tyco International SA), amended to reflect change in par value of registered shares (Filed herewith).

3.2

Organizational Regulations (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 17, 2009).

4.1

Form of Indenture, dated as of June 9, 1998, among Tyco International Group S.A., Tyco and Wilmington Trust Company as successor to The Bank of New York, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Post-effective Amendment No.1 to Tyco's and Tyco International Group S.A.'s Co-Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-50855) filed on June 9, 1998).

4.2

Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of June 9, 1998 among Tyco International Group S.A., Tyco and Wilmington Trust Company as successor to The Bank of New York, as trustee relating to the co-obligor's
7.0% Notes due 2028 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Post-effective Amendment No. 1 to Tyco's and Tyco International Group S.A.'s Co-Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-50855) filed on June 9,
1998).

4.3

Supplemental Indenture No. 8, dated as of January 12, 1999 among Tyco International Group S.A., Tyco International Ltd. and the Bank of New York, as Trustee relating to the co-obligor's 6.875% Notes
due 2029 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-50855) filed on January 26, 1999).

4.4

Supplemental Indenture No. 16, dated as of February 21, 2001 among Tyco International Group S.A., Tyco International Ltd. and the Bank of New York, as Trustee relating to the co-obligor's 6.750% Notes
due 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Tyco International Group S.A.'s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (333-44100) filed on February 28, 2001).

4.5

Supplemental Indenture No. 20, dated as of October 26, 2001 among Tyco International Group S.A., Tyco International Ltd. and the Bank of New York, as Trustee relating to the co-obligor's 6.375% Notes
due 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (333-68508) filed on November 2, 2001).

4.6

Indenture dated as of November 12, 2003, among Tyco International Group S.A., Tyco International Ltd. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Tyco
International Ltd.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003 filed on February 17, 2004).

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 12, 2003, among Tyco International Group S.A., Tyco International Ltd. and The Bank of New York, as trustee relating to the co-obligor's 6.0% Notes due 2013
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003 filed on February 17, 2004).

4.8

Supplemental Indenture 2008-1 by and among Tyco International Ltd., Tyco International Finance S.A. and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, dated as of May 15, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2008).

4.9

Supplemental Indenture 2008-1 by and among Tyco International Ltd., Tyco International Finance S.A. and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, dated as of May 15, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2008).

4.10

Supplemental Indenture 2008-2 by and among Tyco International Ltd., Tyco International Finance S.A. and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, dated as of May 15, 2008 relating to the co-obligor's 6.875%
Notes due 2021 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2008).

4.11

Supplemental Indenture 2008-3 by and among Tyco International Ltd., Tyco International Finance S.A. and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, dated as of May 15, 2008 relating to the co-obligor's 7.0% Notes
due 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2008).

4.12

Indenture, dated as of January 9, 2009, by and among Tyco International Finance S.A., as issuer, Tyco International Ltd., as guarantor, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2009).

4.13

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 9, 2009, by and among Tyco International Finance S.A., as issuer, Tyco International Ltd., as guarantor, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee
relating to the issuer's 8.5% notes due 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2009).

4.14

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2009, by and among Tyco International Finance S.A., as issuer, Tyco International Ltd., as guarantor, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
trustee relating to the issuer's 4.125% notes due 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2009).

10.1

The Tyco International Ltd. Long Term Incentive Plan (formerly known as the ADT 1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan) (as amended May 12, 1999) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Tyco
International Ltd.'s Form S-8 (No. 333-80391) filed on June 10, 1999).

10.2

1994 Restricted Stock Ownership Plan for Key Employees (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-93261) filed on
December 21, 1999).

10.3

Tyco International (US) Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, amended and restated as of October 1, 2000, dated December 30, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Tyco
International Ltd.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 filed on December 14, 2004).

Second Amendment to Tyco International (US) Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated February 14, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 filed on December 14, 2004).

10.5

Third Amendment to Tyco International (US) Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated July 30, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 filed on December 14, 2004).

10.6

Amendments to the Tyco International Ltd. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 24, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 filed on December 14, 2004).(1)(2)

10.7

December 2003 Amendment to Tyco International (US) Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 24, 2003 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 filed on December 14, 2004).(1)

10.8

Amendment No. 2004-1 to the Tyco International (US) Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated April 30, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 filed on December 14, 2004).(1)

10.9

The Amended and Restated Tyco International Ltd. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (Effective January 1, 2005) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 filed December 9, 2005).(1)

10.10

The Tyco International Ltd. Long Term Incentive Plan II (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-75037) filed
March 25, 1999).(1)

10.11

Change in Control Severance Plan for Certain U.S. Officers and Executives dated January 1, 2005, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2009 filed on April 30, 2009).(1)

10.12

Edward D. Breen Employment Contract dated July 25, 2002, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19,
2008).(1)

10.13

Employment Offer Letter dated February 14, 2005 between Tyco International Ltd. and Christopher J. Coughlin (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2005).(1)

10.14

Tyco Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2005 filed on December 9, 2005).(1)

10.15

Tyco International Ltd. 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan amended and restated effective September 10, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Tyco International Ltd. Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2008).(1)

Form of terms and conditions for Option Awards, Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Unit Awards, Performance Share Awards under the 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Tyco
International Ltd's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 26, 2008).(1)

10.17

Form of terms and conditions for Restricted Stock Awards for Directors under the 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan (Filed herewith).(1)

10.18

Terms and conditions for Option Awards and Performance Share Awards granted to Christopher Coughlin under the 2004 Stock and Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Tyco International Ltd.'s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2009).(1)

10.19

Tyco International (US) Inc. Severance Plan for U.S. Officers and Executives Plan, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 27, 2009 filed on April 30, 2009).(1)

10.20

Founders' Grant Option Award (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).(1)

10.21

Founders' Grant Restricted Unit Award (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).(1)

10.22

Founders' Grant Performance Share Unit Award (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).(1)

10.23

Credit Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2007, among Tyco International Finance S.A., Tyco International Ltd., the Lenders party thereto, and Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.4 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2007).

10.24

Amendment No. 2 to 364-Day Senior Bridge Loan Agreement, dated as of November 27, 2007, and Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of April 25, 2007, among Tyco International Ltd., a Bermuda
company, Tyco International Finance S.A., a Luxembourg company, the Lenders party thereto and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007 filed on November 27, 2007).

10.25

Three-Year Senior Unsecured Credit Agreement, dated June 24, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26,
2008).

10.26

Amendment No. 2, dated June 24, 2008, to Five-Year Senior Credit Agreement, dated April 25, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2008).

10.27

Tax Sharing Agreement by and among Tyco International Ltd., Covidien Ltd., and Tyco Electronics Ltd., dated June 29, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Tyco
International Ltd.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).

10.28

Guarantor Assumption Agreement by and among Tyco International Ltd. and Tyco Electronics Ltd., dated as of June 29, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Tyco International Ltd.'s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).

10.29

Guarantor Assumption Agreement by and among Tyco International Ltd. and Tyco Electronics Ltd., dated as of June 29, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Tyco International Ltd.'s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).

Guarantor Assumption Agreement by and among Tyco International Ltd. and Covidien Ltd., dated as of June 29, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).

10.31

Guarantor Assumption Agreement by and among Tyco International Ltd. and Covidien Ltd., dated as of June 29, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Tyco International Ltd.'s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2007).

21.1

Subsidiaries of Tyco International Ltd. (Filed herewith).

23.1

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (Filed herewith).

24.1

Power of Attorney with respect to Tyco International Ltd. signatories (filed herewith).

31.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith).

31.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith).

32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed herewith).

101

Financial statements from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tyco International Ltd. for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2009 formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations,
(ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of
text.

(1)

Management
contract or compensatory plan.

(2)

In
July 1997, a wholly-owned subsidiary of what was formerly called ADT Limited ("ADT") merged with Tyco International Ltd., a
Massachusetts Corporation at the time ("Former Tyco"). Upon consummation of the merger, ADT (the continuing public company) changed its name to Tyco International Ltd. ("Tyco"). Former Tyco
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tyco and changed its name to Tyco International (US) Inc.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant on November 16, 2009 in
the capacities indicated below.

Judith
A. Reinsdorf, by signing her name hereto, does sign this document on behalf of the above noted individuals, pursuant to powers of attorney duly
executed by such individuals, which have been filed as Exhibit 24.1 to this Report.

We are responsible for the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and related
information appearing in this report. We take these responsibilities very seriously and are committed to being recognized as a leader in governance, controls, clarity and transparency of financial
statements. We are committed to making honesty, integrity and transparency the hallmarks of how we run Tyco. We believe that to succeed in today's environment requires more than just compliance with
laws and regulationsit requires a culture based upon the highest levels of integrity and ethical values. Expected behavior starts with our Board of Directors and our senior team leading
by example and includes every one of Tyco's global employees, as well as our customers, suppliers and business partners. One of our most crucial objectives is continuing to maintain and build on the
public, employee and shareholder confidence that has been restored in Tyco. We believe this is being accomplished; first, by issuing financial information
and related disclosures that are accurate, complete and transparent so investors are well informed; second, by supporting a leadership culture based on an ethic of uncompromising integrity and
accountability; and third, by recruiting, training and retaining high-performance individuals who have the highest ethical standards. We take full responsibility for meeting this
objective. We maintain appropriate accounting standards and disclosure controls and devote our full commitment and the necessary resources to these items.

Dedication to Governance, Controls and Financial Reporting

Throughout 2009, we continued to maintain and enhance internal controls over financial reporting, disclosures and corporate governance
practices. We believe that a strong control environment is a dynamic process. Therefore, we intend to continue to devote the necessary resources to maintain and improve our internal controls and
corporate governance.

To
the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Tyco International Ltd.:

We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tyco International Ltd. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 25, 2009 and September 26,
2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 25, 2009. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tyco International Ltd. and subsidiaries as of
September 25, 2009 and September 26, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 25, 2009, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements: i) effective September 29, 2007 the Company adopted new accounting guidance on the accounting for
uncertain income tax positions, ii) the Company changed the depreciation method and estimated useful life used to account for pooled subscriber system assets and related deferred revenue from
the straight-line method with lives ranging from 10 to 14 years to an accelerated method with lives up to 15 years effective as of the beginning of the third quarter of
fiscal 2007, and iii) the Company adopted the new accounting guidance for the recognition and related disclosure provisions for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans effective
September 29, 2007 and the related guidance on the measurement date effective September 27, 2008.

We
have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
September 25, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

To
the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Tyco International Ltd.:

We
have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Tyco International Ltd. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 25, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The
Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.

We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that
receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because
of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material
misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to
future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In
our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 25, 2009, based on the criteria established
in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We
have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of and for the fiscal year ended September 25, 2009 of the Company and our report dated November 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and
financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's adoption of new accounting guidance for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans.