Why Climate Deniers Will Soon Be Underwater

Several congressional leaders from states like Louisiana, Virginia, North Carolina, Alabama, and Texas are staunch deniers of climate change. Here's a look at how rising sea levels will affect their home districts.

Unless you live in Louisiana, you probably haven't heard of Lenar Whitney. She is a Republican member of the Louisiana State House of Representatives who hails from Terrebonne Parish, a county perched on the edge of the Gulf of Mexico. The owner of a dance studio and a little old phone company, Whitney proudly describes herself as "one of the most conservative members of the Louisiana legislature." These days, she is pretty much the gold standard for climate denial.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

In the above video, Whitney goes for the gusto, calling global warming "the biggest deception in the history of mankind," a "conspiracy" aimed at attacking the American Dream (in general) and the energy industry (in particular). Whitney takes aim at the big dog of climate change—Al Gore—claiming that "the earth has done nothing but get colder" every year since the release of An Inconvenient Truth a decade ago.

Nevertheless, the congressional climate denial caucus remains strong, counting 58% of Republicans among its members. For some of these lawmakers, it's easy to see why fighting climate change legislation seems like a good idea. After all, Congressman Dan Benishek of Michigan's first district—who described climate change as "all baloney," "just some scheme," and "unproven science stuff"—has a lot to gain from global warming. A ten-degree temperature increase would make Michigan winters more bearable, and the state's ready supply of fresh water might make it a new, attractive business site as the mercury keeps rising.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Other deniers, like South Carolina's Jeff Duncan and Mick Mulvaney, may be playing the long con. Duncan, who called global warming research "questionable science," and Mulvaney, who called it "baseless claims," are both from inland districts—undervalued areas that will likely become much more attractive when rising sea levels turn them into oceanfront property.

But some of the strongest deniers come from congressional districts that have the most to lose. Oceanfront areas in Virginia, North Carolina, Alabama, Texas and, most notably, Louisiana, consistently send climate-denying congressmen to Washington.

While sea levels are only rising by a fraction of an inch each year, some experts argue that oceanfront areas may face serious problems within the next decade. Climate Central, a nonprofit news service that reports on climate change, estimates that there is a 1 in 6 chance that storm surges will rise a foot by 2020. If this happens, huge sections of the coastal U.S. will be flooded. And, as recent hurricanes demonstrated, it doesn't take a year-round sea level rise to make an area uninhabitable.

Why would congressmen and senators pursue policies that are likely to put their districts under water? Some of it may have to do with the huge amounts of money that energy companies are pouring into the political process. Some may have to do with the huge number of jobs that these industries bring to areas like Louisiana and Texas.

Here is a look at nine such legislators currently holding court in the U.S. Capitol:

Virginia

Rep. Scott Rigell (R, VA): Rigell represents Virginia's second congressional district, most of which occupies a low-lying stretch of land wedged between the Atlantic Ocean and the Chesapeake Bay. He has voted to allow oil drilling off the coast of Virginia and block the EPA from monitoring greenhouse gasses. He publicly stated that he does not believe that climate change is caused by human actions.

Alabama

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R, AL): Alabama's damage from a one foot storm surge would be comparatively minor, affecting only 1,089 people, 1,963 homes and 7,972 acres. Perhaps that's why Sessions, who has received $368,700 from the oil and gas lobby, is so vehement in his denial of climate change. In a 2012 fight with Senator Barbara Boxer, he stated that he was "offended" by her statement that 98% of climate scientists agree about the human impact on global warming. Her response? "You shouldn't be offended by that. That's a fact."

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

In Senate parlance, that's called a smackdown.

Texas

Sen. John Cornyn (R, TX): Climate Central estimates that a relatively modest 3,171 people, 1,972 homes and 44,822 acres of Texas land would be affected by a one foot storm surge. That, coupled with the big shadow that the oil and gas industry casts in the Lone Star state, goes a long way toward explaining the famously outspoken denial that comes from Texas' elected legislators. As a Senator, Cornyn is more restrained than most, but in 2009, he accused NASA of fraud, suggesting that the government agency "massaged" its data to "fit the prescribed theory that global warming is attributable to man-made greenhouse gas emissions."

A Part of Hearst Digital Media
Esquire participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites.