extracted from the article A social justice warrior is not an activist. They haven’t done a bunch of research into an issue, and found a solution to a problem. They aren’t out to improve the lives of others or make the world a better place. They are bitter, resentful, angry, and hateful monsters who are at their core just plain miserable with themselves. The self loathing of their own inadequacies, their utter failure to succeed at anything but antagonizing others, and their knowledge that they will never accomplish anything of substance, leads them to blame invisible outside forces which mysteriously pervade through every aspect of society, culture, and the very fabric of the universe itself. So they seek to see them all destroyed.

So true, most of the "Social Justice Warriors" indulge in slacktivism too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slacktivism
They go to a big event a show or a party waste tons of garbage and still they consider themselves "ecologists".

Forgot to mention thishttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_pimp
Poverty pimp or "professional poverty pimp" is a pejorative label used to convey that an individual or group is benefiting unduly by acting as an intermediary on behalf of the poor, the disadvantaged, or some other "victimized" groups

Misery loves company. I've never met an SJW in person that was happy and came from a stable intact family. They all seem so sad or angry or both. You can't even debate with them, they take everything personally. If you tell them the truth, they take it as a personal assault and react as such. I remember reading an article by a liberal SJW professor who felt physically threatened and afraid that a student in his class raised his hand, waited to be called on, then expressed a different viewpoint. Yes you read that right. Spoken words that differ from their fanatical beliefs are considered the same as a physical assault.

__________________

Luke 22:36 "And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one."

Take feminists for example. In a world where men work the most dangerous jobs, are 90+% of the prison population, 40% of domestic violence victims, nearly all war casualties, half of all rape victims, pay most of the taxes, and lose nearly all child custody battles, feminists have the nerve to claim men are oppressing women. These ideas are just so plain ridiculous they do not even deserve a refutation, yet, no matter how many times they are refuted, and thoroughly so, these maniacs continue to insist on that which is demonstrably false. Not only that, but they perpetually demand that governments institute laws to violently manipulate society and the economy to undo these non-existent conditions of oppression. Since the problem was never a lack of legislation to begin with, these policies do nothing to address the real problem, which is their debilitated mental state. When the problem is still not solved, does the feminist change course? Nope! They just demand more laws!

I believe the author is correct. SJWs, and liberals generally, are victims of a peculiar thanatos cult which destroys their minds, and eventually themselves, as well as any of us that unwillingly get caught in the net they throw.

From Waaay Out West,

~HLM

__________________

God is always on the side of the big battalions

--Frederick the Great

The struggle we are now waging today until victory or the bitter end is, in its deepest sense, a struggle between Christ and Marx

--Joseph Goebbels

...the US, with its universal surveillance, police state mentality, hatred of freedom, anti-white discrimination, lawless replacement migration, and torture, matches its fraternal twin and wartime ally Communism, and bastard child, Zionism. It’s as if the Mafia, a comparable criminal conspiracy, had gobbled up the local, state, and federal governments, remade them in its own image, and extended its tentacles globally.

Perhaps I'm being optimistic, but I think it's death cult attributes will be the reason for it's eventual downfall. That or it gets so bizzare, internal disputes cause it to fold into itself. Not too soon, but I'd give it another 10 - 20 years max.

I don't agree that they come from bad backgrounds. That's the whole point. They come from educated wealthy nurturing backgrounds yet they somehow self identify with criminals, fags and ghetto dwellers.

I don't agree that they come from bad backgrounds. That's the whole point. They come from educated wealthy nurturing backgrounds yet they somehow self identify with criminals, fags and ghetto dwellers.

Perhaps not bad background in terms of single, unemployed, addict mother homes. So not low income and circumstances, as determining factor. But perhaps more like in working yuppy-parents homes, who have no real relationship in the family, while the kid(s) get money pumped into their ass and can get away with all kinds of sh!t.