New Evidence Suggests That Plane Disappearance Was A Deliberate Acthttp://www.businessinsider.com/mh370-deliberate-act-2014-3/comments
en-usWed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 -0500Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:35:26 -0400Paul Szoldrahttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/5323f87a6bb3f7b1571ad621pSat, 15 Mar 2014 02:51:38 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5323f87a6bb3f7b1571ad621
Anyone ever read the Left Behind Series?????http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5323a7fb6bb3f7b6361ad61dMisunderstanding is going onFri, 14 Mar 2014 21:08:11 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5323a7fb6bb3f7b6361ad61d
"If the phones were active"
No, they weren't, but the network thought that they are. After a moment the network learns that it can't find the phone. Exactly the same thing happened after Air France 447 and happens every day with roaming phones.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53233618eab8ea14482e4d5dNotSheepFri, 14 Mar 2014 13:02:16 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53233618eab8ea14482e4d5d
I have to agree with you, something doesn't smell right. There is a very telling fact that gives me serious doubts about the official explanation, and that is the cell phones. Hours after the plane went missing family members were still able to call their loved ones phones. If the phones were active they could be tracked within 1 meter of location by sat data, GPS locations, and cell triangulation. Within five minutes of the plane reported missing the NSA could locate ANY cell phone on the planet, and if there was more than one active it is even easier to locate. So what is really going on?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322e6646da8110506d10f8eCommercial InterestFri, 14 Mar 2014 07:22:12 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322e6646da8110506d10f8e
Well, I don't know if the American authorities are to be trusted, either. They likely have a commercial interest in protecting Boeing. A hijack scenario would mean Boeing is not at fault, so it makes sense for the American authorities to push it.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322d3a9ecad04e76f2bdd25johnsmith012Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:02:17 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322d3a9ecad04e76f2bdd25
Journalism has been dead @ BI.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322d2a56bb3f7644f3875f5AnarchusFri, 14 Mar 2014 05:57:57 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322d2a56bb3f7644f3875f5
According to reliable sources, the flight was following air navigation waypoints heading for the Andaman Islands in the Bay of Bengal. That pretty much confirms that (a) the transponder was turned off by either the pilot or co-pilot and that the aircraft was being piloted or navigated by someone experienced.
But still . . . . . WHY head that way?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322ca016da8112a12d10f7cJohn CFri, 14 Mar 2014 05:21:05 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322ca016da8112a12d10f7c
Agree with what you say, but this type of plane serves a few purposes
... large enough to carry it
... maximum distance capability
... visual detection is benign due to being commercial airliner
Of course a big stretch but do need to think out of the box on these sorts of things.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322b76e6bb3f7257f29bd77A PilotFri, 14 Mar 2014 04:01:50 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322b76e6bb3f7257f29bd77
In his email to his employers on March 12 he claims he saw flames in the sky which quickly extinguished.
“From when I first saw the burning (plane) until the flames went out (still at high altitude) was 10-15 seconds.
Seem consistent with an explosion and resulting fire to mehttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322aa9d69bedd51468b457fGareth EngramFri, 14 Mar 2014 03:07:09 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322aa9d69bedd51468b457f
Wow, I had written all the rumour off as conspiracy theory but this is starting to look worrying.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322a175eab8ea4b117bea42Jack BauerFri, 14 Mar 2014 02:28:05 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322a175eab8ea4b117bea42
I can find it. Give me 24 hours.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53229d6a69bedded158b4580Anon E MooseFri, 14 Mar 2014 02:10:50 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53229d6a69bedded158b4580
Don't forget the Nazi-Love-Slaves all imprisoned in the Bunker-O-Love subplot.
After all, all those WWII leftovers must be in the 80s and 90s and need new Breeding Stock ....http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532291ec6bb3f7767229bd95AnarchusFri, 14 Mar 2014 01:21:48 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532291ec6bb3f7767229bd95
anyone with the capability of putting together an atomic bomb (North Koreans or Pakistanis, even rogue elements within the gov't of one of those countries) or illicitly gaining access to an atomic bomb could much more easily gain access to an aircraft in country using other means . . . . .http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53229157ecad047d137bea3dAnarchusFri, 14 Mar 2014 01:19:19 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53229157ecad047d137bea3d
And a fire in the sky - an airliner on fire with thousands of pounds of highly flammable and volatile jet fuel on board, no less - is completely inconsistent with the plane flying on for an additional 3-4 hours.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53229059eab8eaa4497bea43AnarchusFri, 14 Mar 2014 01:15:05 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53229059eab8eaa4497bea43
Or Bush.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53228de269beddd15f8b4568US Joint Chiefs -- Kennedy AdministrationFri, 14 Mar 2014 01:04:34 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53228de269beddd15f8b4568
Operation Northwoods -- just wait and see. This flight's disappearance will be used as a pretext for war.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53228b7d6bb3f7685729bd7eJohn CFri, 14 Mar 2014 00:54:21 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53228b7d6bb3f7685729bd7e
If plane intact & in rouge hands,
I'd be concerned that could be equipped for
An atomic bomb mission.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532289fc6bb3f7066329bd77WTF, dudes?Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:47:56 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532289fc6bb3f7066329bd77
are you going to use that stupid comment from Patrick Smith in every friggin' article?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532282766da8118c587bea3fHankeFri, 14 Mar 2014 00:15:50 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532282766da8118c587bea3f
It sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53228231ecad04ff5e7bea44VelocitorFri, 14 Mar 2014 00:14:41 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53228231ecad04ff5e7bea44
You're NOT?!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322822aeab8ea961d7bea3dCalgary SkepticFri, 14 Mar 2014 00:14:34 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322822aeab8ea961d7bea3d
That isn't what I meant. It's absolutely ridiculous that anyone can disable it - pilot, thief, terrorist, anyone. There should be no off switch to airplane communication.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53227d0169bedd0c268b456aRoger C.Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:52:33 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53227d0169bedd0c268b456a
Are you sure the pilots disabled it?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53227ce06bb3f7f22d29bd7dRoger C.Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:52:00 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53227ce06bb3f7f22d29bd7d
No way, not at ALL. They actually found wreckage where the plane was supposed to be! The rest was deep underwater and required assistance from different companies and undersea exploration experts to be found.
Know your facts before spouting off like some expert!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53227c856da811423a7bea41badreligThu, 13 Mar 2014 23:50:29 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53227c856da811423a7bea41
at FL350 the pilots could don o2 masks and then dump the pressure in the cabin and killed everyone within 5 to 10 minuteshttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322798f6bb3f7312a29bd77badreligThu, 13 Mar 2014 23:37:51 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322798f6bb3f7312a29bd77
that's ridiculoushttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/532274d16da811ff177bea49WHRThu, 13 Mar 2014 23:17:37 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532274d16da811ff177bea49
His story is very much like the Air France Rio to Paris crash of an Airbus in 2009. After 5 days of searching the Brazilian Navy found some of the wreckage. Two years later they found the black boxes.
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_447" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_447</a>http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532274356bb3f7081329bd77Calgary SkepticThu, 13 Mar 2014 23:15:01 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532274356bb3f7081329bd77
I's ridiculous that pilots even have the option of disabling these communication devices.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53227422eab8ea405f7bea41delmoThu, 13 Mar 2014 23:14:42 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53227422eab8ea405f7bea41
What is also amazing is how the media, TV, internet, radio... can talk and talk for hours every day for six days, and we only know one thing for sure: Flight MH370 is missing.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532272eb6bb3f75a0f29bd7bWHRThu, 13 Mar 2014 23:09:31 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532272eb6bb3f75a0f29bd7b
We do know that one of the first officer, in the past has invited young ladies into the cockpit. Here is a link to a CNN story and pixs with the blonde Aussie passengers.
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-cockpit-companions/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-cockpit-companions/</a>http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226ffb6bb3f78f0229bd79warThu, 13 Mar 2014 22:56:59 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226ffb6bb3f78f0229bd79
I don't think so! I think the news media want to divert our attention. You ask why? It's abouit Russia not backing down from the USA...http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226e5269beddb26b8b456cRoger C.Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:49:54 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226e5269beddb26b8b456c
My friend that has just been unthawed from the 1940's, the plane has all sorts of equipment that can send out signals and communicate. Probably even tech the NSA and other spy agencies can use to track it. And I'm sure they are suspicious about what exactly had been turned off, and how!
Has this ever happened before? Come on now! Something reeks, badly.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226c336bb3f73f7929bd77Jason Ka Ki TseThu, 13 Mar 2014 22:40:51 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226c336bb3f73f7929bd77
American's were testing lasers & electronic warfare at the same time?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226a8decad04040f7bea3dJungle JimThu, 13 Mar 2014 22:33:49 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226a8decad04040f7bea3d
Write it up, I'll buy the first copy off the press. Be sure to work some of the better looking passengers in, you'll need a sex angle. .http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532268906da8116d697bea3dCameron FraserThu, 13 Mar 2014 22:25:20 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532268906da8116d697bea3d
Given that China Airlines has 10 on order (with options for four more) with deliveries scheduled to take place over two years beginning next September, they don't really need to steal one to get their hands on onehttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/532266deeab8ea062b7bea43John HenderThu, 13 Mar 2014 22:18:06 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532266deeab8ea062b7bea43
Whatever is going on in you head is scary.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532266baecad0498757bea4cObummerThu, 13 Mar 2014 22:17:30 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532266baecad0498757bea4c
Like a Twilight Zone episode where the plane went back in time. Instead of a polar vortex it hit a time vortex.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532266896bb3f72c5d29bd77John HenderThu, 13 Mar 2014 22:16:41 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532266896bb3f72c5d29bd77
I struggle with reception in NYC, let alone 36,000 feet in the air over an ocean.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532266566da811a2607bea40ChinaThu, 13 Mar 2014 22:15:50 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532266566da811a2607bea40
China stole it so they can copy ithttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322627beab8eaf5217bea47A PilotThu, 13 Mar 2014 21:59:23 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322627beab8eaf5217bea47
It's a bigass world dude and the oceans and seas are quite big also. Not even the US or China have omnipresent continuous satellite coverage of every inch of the world. The plane is in the sea and will be found eventually. The search area is somewhat larger than usual and in two different seas because of the initial confusion none of which is unusual. Whilst a hijacking is possible it is inconsistent with the reported fire in the sky.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226206eab8ea04227bea3fJohnK - SeattleThu, 13 Mar 2014 21:57:26 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53226206eab8ea04227bea3f
And it might just be another stunt (like Tehran) to stop a war between the US and China.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532260e86da8114e437bea43Roger C.Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:52:40 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532260e86da8114e437bea43
Only problem is, WHERE IS THIS PLANE? Your theory sounds more harebrained than theirs! Usually, someone comes across a wrecked plane eventually, regardless of where it lands. There has been no sign of this plane whatsoever! I mean, there's only so long someone can assume it was a crash before you start wising up...http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322600fecad04425e7bea46Roger C.Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:49:03 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322600fecad04425e7bea46
War on Terror 2: Pakistan.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53225d61eab8ea7f0c7bea46BaffeledThu, 13 Mar 2014 21:37:37 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53225d61eab8ea7f0c7bea46
Best explanation I've seen yet!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53225c85eab8ea880c7bea3ddjThu, 13 Mar 2014 21:33:57 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53225c85eab8ea880c7bea3d
Its a damn DIVERSION, so no one pays attention to the fact that our own state department is about to start a war with Russia, after WE overthrew the Ukrainian government, and installed a NAZI puppet government. (Don't believe me? CLICK THE LINK! I DARE YOU! RIGHT from them MOUTH of the US ambassador) THEY know that the public would NOT BACK these actions, so lets create a disappearing airplane mystery...
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWkfpGCAAuw" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWkfpGCAAuw</a>
<a href="http://scgnews.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://scgnews.com/</a>http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53225c20ecad04044c7bea41A PilotThu, 13 Mar 2014 21:32:16 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53225c20ecad04044c7bea41
This is typical scaremongering BS. What seems consistent with the facts is the following;
Some sort of explosion damages all radio communications and takes out the main data link possibly injuring or killing the pilots.
The explosion starts a fire seen by Oil rig contractor
The fire grows and takes out the transponder
Either under limited control or on its own as a result of damage to the flight control cables, the plane turns back towards Malaysia.
It then flies for 4 - 5 hours until it runs out of fuel over the Indian Ocean and goes down.
The pings heard did not contain any data but were merely the identification handshake signal sent by the satellite to the ACARS system which did not respond but appears to have received the signal i.e. the plane was still flying on its own or under control but only the receiver, which is probably essentially an iridium satellite phone linked to the system, was operating. This is probably not in the cockpit and would not necessarily have been disabled by the most likely original cause which was probably an explosion of some sort.
It is also likely that the explosion caused the plane to depressurize which would have rendered many of the pax and crew unconcious at least temporarily. When / if they came to the cockpit was probably not accessible due to the fire.
This is consistent with what we know.
1) Lost contact at or near ITC boundary between Malaysia and Vietnam
2) Fire in the sky seen and reported
3) Malaysian radar plot indicates turnback
4) ACARS passive interrogation ping's received for a further 4- 5 hours.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532259b06bb3f71c3729bd85A man.Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:21:52 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532259b06bb3f71c3729bd85
Obviously a Pakistani/Afghan drug Czar "ordered" the plane. The pilot was in on it and depressurized the cabin killing/incapacitating everyone on board. A 777 would be worth tens of millions on the black market and the pilot no doubt got a cut of that. The plane landed in a remote location and a crew of some guys unloaded the bodies and burned them, rummaged through the luggage for loot and burn the leftover material as well. The identification of the plane will be changed with drug bribing money and fly for some shipping company or registered as a private aircraft. Think how much a 777 loaded with heroin be worth, one run and you pay the jet of 4 times over. After a couple runs they can sell it to terrorists and load it with nuclear payload and slam it into something. This is not going to turn out good.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532259796da811f1247bea41WHY!Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:20:57 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532259796da811f1247bea41
This is 2014!! How can we lose a plane just like that? Where is the radar and countless satellites we have surrounding our planet? Something is not right here. Also why have we heard NOTHING on the backgrounds of the pilots?
This is getting insane.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53225693eab8eaa8767bea3fRTThu, 13 Mar 2014 21:08:35 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53225693eab8eaa8767bea3f
.
Tom Clancy + Stephen King + Ian Fleming + Timothy O'Leary = together, still couldn't top this.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532254cdeab8ea21647bea47LolThu, 13 Mar 2014 21:01:01 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532254cdeab8ea21647bea47
You're going to trust Malaysian authorities over American?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532254636bb3f7512529bd77StevexThu, 13 Mar 2014 20:59:15 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532254636bb3f7512529bd77
It's somewhere in China.
20 engineers from Freescale semiconductor were aboard and working on Cloaking technology. Yeah, nothing to see here..move along!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532254256bb3f7ed2429bd7bMysteryThu, 13 Mar 2014 20:58:13 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532254256bb3f7ed2429bd7b
"Two U.S. officials believe the shutdown of two separate communications systems from the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 happened at different times, indicating the disappearance was less likely the result of a catastrophic failure and more the result of a deliberate act."
Why not a fire? If it spreads, it could damage one communications system, while leaving the other communications system, at first, intact. Also fits the story of a witness who said he saw the plane on fire, plunging to the ground.
"Further, investigators suspect the missing flight stayed in the air for about four hours after it reached its last confirmed location..."
Wasn't that already discounted by the Malaysian authorities?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322534e6da811810c7bea3dIsolationistThu, 13 Mar 2014 20:54:38 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322534e6da811810c7bea3d
Good comment. I agree with you. In the old days, news stories actually had a "review process" of various types, which added untold minutes to hours before actual release of the finished story. Nowadays, any Joe Schmoe can just write up absolutely ANYTHING AT ALL, hit "send", and voilà, a million people or more might be reading this within minutes. It could be Pulitzer Prize material, or more likely, just plain garbage - there is no way of knowing for sure.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322524a6da811437c7bea48ChucklesThu, 13 Mar 2014 20:50:18 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5322524a6da811437c7bea48
If you're looking for journalism on BI, you've come to the wrong place.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53224f0eecad0414297bea41ChasThu, 13 Mar 2014 20:36:30 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53224f0eecad0414297bea41
This is the problem of living in the age of Twitter and Facebook~ hard journalism has been replaced with speculation and innuendo. Journalism is dead.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53224de4eab8eafd557bea45www.TopTheNews.comThu, 13 Mar 2014 20:31:32 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53224de4eab8eafd557bea45
Whatever happens next will be blamed on Iran...http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53224c8a69bedd826a29bd7bAskCommentThu, 13 Mar 2014 20:25:46 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/53224c8a69bedd826a29bd7b
the minute passengers noticed something wouldnt they text, call, email or something?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532248ca69bedd7f5329bd7dJungle JimThu, 13 Mar 2014 20:09:46 -0400http://www.businessinsider.com/c/532248ca69bedd7f5329bd7d
That implies that it was landed somewhere and is being stored there in anticipation of future use. But there is NO evidence of such a landing and we have the question of what the hijackers would do with the passengers. Over 260 passengers can't be kept on ice for very long. Would they just be killed ? That would likely backfire on whatever cause the hijackers espouse, The whole scenario is somewhat fanciful. The plane is almost certainly down, the questions are where, when, and why ?