Ready to fight back?

Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week.

You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Support Progressive Journalism

The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.

Fight Back!

Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week.

You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Travel With The Nation

Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.

Sign up for our Wine Club today.

Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?

There are two critical matters that President Barack Obama must confront before leaving office: preventing the reappearance of a US-government torture regime and warding off any future FBI interference with elections.1

Donald Trump, the president-elect, has repeatedly expressed an appalling enthusiasm for “waterboarding and even worse.” The fact that torture is a federal crime under the US anti-torture statute seems to have made no impression on him, possibly because no high-level official responsible for torture, such as former president George W. Bush, vice-president Dick Cheney, and CIA director George Tenet, has ever been investigated, much less prosecuted for it. Ironically, the Obama administration policy of looking forward, not back, may have created a sense of impunity for torture that will catapult us backwards into another torture regime.2

If we can’t have accountability, then at least we can know the whole truth about the Bush administration’s torture regime so that we can fashion remedies to prevent its recurrence. President Obama can help on this score by ensuring that critical documents dealing with torture program are preserved and ultimately made public. 3

The most important of these documents is the comprehensive report on the CIA’s torture program written by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. While a 500-page summary of the report was declassified (for the most part) and publicly released in 2014, the full 6,700-page report remains under wraps.4

It is imperative to declassify and release the report because it strongly debunks the claims still made by the torture program’s defenders that it produced vital intelligence. The full report would also help the American people understand the horrors of the program, its gratuitous violence and its depravity. These two factors should help discourage its use again.5

President Obama should try to declassify and release it, a step called for by Senator Dianne Feinstein, who chaired the Senate Intelligence Committee when the report was completed, as well as other committee senators.6

Unfortunately, there might not be enough time to accomplish this before President Obama leaves office.7

In the absence of public release, there is a serious danger that all copies of the full report could be returned to the Senate where they might never see the light of day. The Republican chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who strongly opposes the report, has called for a return of all copies previously delivered to several federal agencies and the president.8

Ready to Fight Back? Sign Up For Take Action Now

One approach to preserving and releasing the torture report is to try to obtain it under the Freedom of Information Act. The American Civil Liberties Union has sued—unsuccessfully so far—but the Justice Department has fought its release, arguing that it is a congressional document not subject to the Act. Justice’s position is flat-out wrong, and President Obama should make it clear that he favors the release of the report under FOIA.9

A second approach is to have the full report deemed a presidential record, which, under the Presidential Records Act, would require its preservation by the National Archives. According to Professor Douglas Cox of CUNY School of Law, an expert on federal records, the report is already a presidential record, although to avoid any doubt in the event the Senate Intelligence Committee chair still seeks its return, the president should make a copy of the report and deliver both the original and the copy to the National Archives. I would add that the president should require his staff to look at some pages of the report to enhance its status as a presidential record. These actions would at least ensure the preservation of the report, and allow for its later public release.10

President Obama should also declassify and release of other documents relating to the US torture regime, including the assistance given by other countries as well as US efforts to block other countries from holding US torturers accountable. The details of torture inflicted on any Guantánamo detainee should also be fully declassified, and any secret Office of Legal Counsel memos that authorize torture should be withdrawn and disclosed, thus removing any remaining legal authority for a new torture regime.11

President Obama’s spokesperson recently touted the president’s work in ending torture. That vital legacy can be undone unless the whole record of the Bush administration’s torture regime is known, allowing appropriate lessons to be learned and preventive measures taken.12

Another critical step that President Obama should take is to see to it that an investigation of FBI Director Jim Comey’s actions prior to the November 8 election be commenced immediately. The FBI must be kept from interfering again in a presidential election.13

Although we may never know whether Director Comey’s announcement that he was examining a newly found trove of e-mails eleven days before the election actually caused the defeat of former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Clinton campaign certainly believes that it did. Director Comey’s actions defied longstanding Justice Department policy. And his justification—that he had earlier promised Congress to look at new information relating to the secretary’s e-mails —did not explain his need to initiate his “look” so close to the election or why he made that “look” public.14

Furthermore, reports surfaced in the media that FBI agents in the New York office leaked information about the new e-mail trove to the Trump campaign and possibly to others. Rudy Giuliani, a former US Attorney and top Trump adviser, predicted an October surprise, but when Director Comey announced his probe, Giuliani quickly backtracked.15

It is intolerable for a federal police force to try to affect a presidential election. Finding out what happened and why may help ensure that this kind of action will never be repeated.16

Elizabeth HoltzmanElizabeth Holtzman is a former U.S. representative from New York. She won national attention for her role on the House Judiciary Committee during Watergate and was subsequently elected district attorney of Kings County (Brooklyn). She is a Harvard Law School graduate and author of The Impeachment of George W. Bush: A Practical Guide for Concerned Citizens (2006).