If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

I watched the vid. I am not sure what that has to do with an action that takes place in the shadow of 9-11.

There was MORE justification to invade and topple Saddam's regime after the first Gulf War, where he was a clear aggressor, unlike in 2001. The EXACT events that Mr. Cheney warned would happen, HAVE happened, and we are still occupying Iraq with what,130,000 troops yet, and Mr. Obama seems in no hurry to get out.

I didn't call him any names besides "Dick Cheney", which IS his name. I said I probably wouldn't convince someone that he was a lying scoundrel. "Convince" is the action verb, "Dick Cheney is a lying scoundrel" was the operative of that action verb, not a statement being attested to in the sentence.

Jeez, I hated grammar when I was a kid. Please figure this stuff out on your own, so you quit your nagging accusations. They're very tiresome. You remind me of the smart kid in class who just lurks and waits to criticize everytime you think there's an opportunity.

Subroc and I were politely agreeing to disagree, when out of the shadows I'm jumped on with personal attacks, yet once again. I don't mean to sound like I'm whining, but it's just getting old. If I wanted to hear personal attacks in lieu of issues, I'd tune in Ann Coulter. For the most part, this is a great place to hear opposing points of view and banter issues back and forth, with a few recurring exceptions.

I didn't call him any names besides "Dick Cheney", which IS his name. I said I probably wouldn't convince someone that he was a lying scoundrel. "Convince" is the action verb, "Dick Cheney is a lying scoundrel" was the operative of that action verb, not a statement being attested to in the sentence.

Jeez, I hated grammar when I was a kid. Please figure this stuff out on your own, so you quit your nagging accusations. They're very tiresome. You remind me of the smart kid in class who just lurks and waits to criticize everytime you think there's an opportunity.

I was referring to your "puppet boy" slur, Tiger.

Speaking of being reminded of someone else....you should be required to preference your posts with, "Well you know, Sammy...."

I have noticed you haven't addressed any of the issues of his unethical actions towards the troops, or his 180 flip-flop on invading Iraq. Typical Fox-type response. If you have NOTHING to say, you attack....personal attacks work best. Are you related to Rove?

If you look at my posts, you will see I refer to presidents properly 99% of the time. Puppet boy refers to the fact he didn't run things, a fact well supported by his former corporate board members. (House of Bush, House of Saud, Unger 2004) So puppet boy slipped out, BFD. Truth is an absolute defense of slander! But I still try to show respect for the office, and succeed almost all the time.

Bush was indeed a puppet so there is nothing wrong with calling him a puppet.
Most polititians serve themselves and the people who send them the most money.

I see nothing wrong with calling a spade a spade.
If politians didnt affect american lives then it wouldnt be no big deal.
There is no doubt in my mind that most are liars,spinners and treasonist bastards,,
But because they wear a 3 piece suit and smile in front of the camera we think they are so wonderful and would never intentionally screw the people who put them where they are. Its all a fun filled exciting global game they play.
Few have the character to do the right thing,and they cover their intent by blaming things on others politicians. And most do this.its a massive web.
So I have no shame in calling them exactly what they are. I dont care how much they smile and appear in front of the camera.

These people lack integraty and character and are easily swayed by lobbiests.

There is only one reason people spends hundreds of millions of dollars to obtain a 4 year job which pays only a few hundred thousand a year.
They desire prestige and power.

I can guantee they have no idea whats good for us. They have played this game so long they have forgotten why they do what they do.
Its not name calling if its true. Its just a discriptive way of defining what you see.

I have noticed you haven't addressed any of the issues of his unethical actions towards the troops, or his 180 flip-flop on invading Iraq.

Perhaps you've also noticed that I don't address most of the buffonery you type. It would be a full-time job trying to keep up with all the erroneous information you spew out; much less trying to rebut your soup sandwich (as in "f'ed up like a..."), half-baked opinions that revolve around your half-baked facts. You're like a Cliff Clavin version of a Chatty Cathy doll that pulls its own string over and over and over and...