On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 14:27 +0100, Benjamin Krill wrote:
> >>On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 17:18 +0100, Benjamin Krill wrote:
> >>> SLOF has a further node which could not be evaluate
> >>> by the current routine. The current routine returns
> >>> because the node hasn't the required reg property. As
> >>> fix this patch adds a check to determine the partition
> >>> child nodes. If the node is not an partition the number
> >>> of total partitions will be decreased and loop continue
> >>> with the next nodes.
> >>
> >>Somebody on the MTD list is taking that ? David ? Or should I merge it
> >>via powerpc ?
> >
> >Could somebody merge it for the next release?
>> Again, new try to get it somewhere merged.
Applied; thanks.
--
dwmw2