Comments

I rarely have stats to delete Ken, not that that worries me. It is a great game. Can't remember when I last played it. 11, 12 and 13 obliged this evening.. 14, 15 and 16 look unwinnable. Playing #17 right now.There is a very infrequent bug in the reserve. Occasionally it's possible to move two cards that are built down in alternate colour onto the tableau. It seems likely that three such cards would also move contrary to the rules.

Thanks for trying Larry. New winners are 23, 26 and 27. I reached 30 and am now replaying all the losers. Plenty to pick from. :)The trick with some of them is often to refuse a card from the stock and take another one of the same rank from later in the deal. Obviously that changes what lies beneath them. That's what interests me most about it. Solution for #13 attached.

I had that one up to 62 before I decided to move on. I won 34, 47 and 50. #46 must be winnable. I got it to 66 before I moved on. I seem to reach the stage where I am just repeating previous moves. I'll replay them at some point and hope I've forgotten the moves I selected last time. I don't intend playing past #50 until I've given my losers some more attention. I'll let you know.

Attaching a solution for #1 Mike so you can see the choices that I made. Taking or refusing cards is quite arbitrary at times. It's not until the end of the game that you discover whether or not you chose correctly. There is quite a lot of luck involved in Variegated Canfield. I intend to play the first hundred and then look for something else to torment myself with. :)

I got it to where the 2 and 3 of hearts were the problem. I could get one out and not the other. Since I know there is a way. I will find it Like I said I am not playing much right now. But thanks for the solution. I will probably need it.

" Google Translate" was as baffled as me by both of those posts.This is a genuine archaic Scottish word for you to add to your vocabulary ........ "betrump". It means "to cheat". This is not fake news. Practically everything else is though. ;))

Clearly another example of fake news Ken. Curious that (arguably) the two most powerful men on the planet, Trump and Putin experience this phenomenon all of the time. Both try to discredit all of the proof and evidence that is laid at their door with no sign of embarrassment. Their attitude appears to be, "We can lie our way out of this like we did all of the other times.". Many people swallow it anywayYour story did hit the news here too. All of our fake media outlets covered it. Shame on the lot of them. ;)) Is this the start of a pandemic?