Quite frankly who cares who killed how many whites on either side. WWII has been over for more 60 years, it's time to move on. Saying Hitler was anti-white for killing whites or that Churchill was anti-white for killing whites is as meaningless as saying Lincoln was anti-white for killing whites or that Jefferson Davis was anti-white for killing whites since all the people mention above were racialists. Our focus needs to be on maintaining a future for our race, not endlessly arguing about who killed more whites in some war; all wars in the past should stay there, and all wars in the future where whites kill whites should be held as useless with meaningless victories. Once again this is about our future not our past. While it is important to have heroes (particulary historical heroes) we have to keep our eyes on target which is our continued existance as a people.

You are absolutely right.
Some have already pointed out that the tone has been lowered by accusations and recriminations.

It would be the same to ask what the CSA has to do with WNism.
Or the Klan...could be argued they are an local variety of whiteness, and catholics may feel out of joint visavis the Orang order.

The question was for Adolf Hitler Admirers.
Although many might not feel comfortable with the tone of the question, the point to answer it is, that the NSDAP episode does play some role in the awareness some of our people have in regard to WNism.

Just as the CSA episode in America may still have some relevance in the legend of our struggle.

The Titanic struggle between Germany and the Soviet Union, is part of our legend also.
It just so happens that the red side of the tale is not the one that most WNists want to gravitate towards.

The form of Bolshevism we have in Britain is the Trotztkist version.
Entryism...Subversion...Intimidation.

The leverage of the Multi Cultural society to deconstruct our white society.

All of this was warned against by the German leadership of the NSDAP.
That is a certain reason why some of us may feel respect or admiration...that the mans words came to be a prophesy of our doom.
We were warned.

We had our workforce sacrificed, and had to import a new workforce off the banana boats and offer them equality for their labour.

You know I have to say how amazed I am at all these great reasons to admire hitler!

I admire Hitler because he understood, and could articulate his understanding to millions of White men and women, the corrosive effect the jew had on any White nation or community, and was aware of how the great White Russian nation to the east had been brought down to its knees by the jew-communists. Knowing how the Russian people had been, and were being enslaved and murdered by the jews Hitler intended that such would not be the fate of Germany's men, women and children.
I don't post this to convince or persuade jb6, because he won't be convinced or persuaded. I merely post this to state my point of view of the greatest White man that ever lived.

And there are similarities between WN and NS. If you believe a WN that admires Hitler is an NS, then surely Hitler must also be considered a Christian Social by that logic. Surely, the point here is that certain members should stop playing the "any admirer of Hitler is an evil Nazi" card?

Yes I believe an WN that admires is an NS, you yourself admitted there are similarities, maybe that´s why

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Byron

Quite frankly who cares who killed how many whites on either side. WWII has been over for more 60 years, it's time to move on. Saying Hitler was anti-white for killing whites or that Churchill was anti-white for killing whites is as meaningless as saying Lincoln was anti-white for killing whites or that Jefferson Davis was anti-white for killing whites since all the people mention above were racialists. Our focus needs to be on maintaining a future for our race, not endlessly arguing about who killed more whites in some war; all wars in the past should stay there, and all wars in the future where whites kill whites should be held as useless with meaningless victories. Once again this is about our future not our past. While it is important to have heroes (particulary historical heroes) we have to keep our eyes on target which is our continued existance as a people.

For decades NS unsuccessfully try to sell their sugar-coated NS as nationalism, and still people here do not vote for it. As long as there is no break and a policy that keeps a clear distance to historical NS, there won´t be a progress. It is the NS that claim it was the Jews having started the WW2 - when I asked why they want me to support them they said only NS can save Germany/Europe. When I asked what they think would happen if NS gets political influence here - those Jews that allegedly started WW2 surly now won´t stand idle and watch instead of using nuclear weapons...I got the reply I was a panic-monger.
I also have met NS IRL, to discuss how national conservatives and NS could cooperate considering the fact Germany is in a deep crisis - they stubbornly prefer their ideology over the need to win the own people, alright, not my problem, I need noone and watch them failing.

As someone who until fairly recently always hated Hitler and blamed him for the state Europe has become (any of my 1st couple yrs posts on here will testify to this) I think he has been portayed in the wrong light and I was essentailly a victim of propoganda.

Sure he was no Saint but I think his hand was forced on many occasions when he is portayed as the aggresor.

Regardless of what is said of him- love/hate - he definetly didnt open up mosques in Europe although he did rely on islamic cut-throats SS divisions when he was in trouble and viewed islam as a good religion - 'jihad' 'houris' -
in comparison to christianity - 'the bstrd child of jewish bolshevism' but didnt want it for the Europeans.

Who could argue that things would be worse off if he had won?
we are at the cusp of extinction, utterly subdued and virtually everything he said would happen DID.

Its hard to see past yrs of indoctrination especially when you were on the so called 'winning side'

(Actually Stalin only opened churches and I believe A mosque. If germans opened mosques then Hitler has actually just lost more of my respect.)

Your respect is as maybe.
You cannot claim though that AH had it in for white Russians, when he showed respect for the Cossack nations for example, and opened Mosques that were obviously nothing to do with White nations.

You seem to be getting contemporary issues confused with historic issues.

There was no such thing as WNism in 1940.

The struggle that AH put up against the Red Scum was something that many...even contemporary Russians recognise.

[QUOTE=junkers88;6704240]Your respect is as maybe.
You cannot claim though that AH had it in for white Russians, when he showed respect for the Cossack nations for example, and opened Mosques that were obviously nothing to do with White nations.
/QUOTE]
Considering what he wrote of the Russian people I darn well can note he in fact had it out for cossak nations.

As for non white nations. Why?

If hitler was a white nationalist why bother?

A white nationalist in his position would have started a jew-arab war in the middle east. Watch muds fight it out and england and france struggle to protect their holdings.

This is on the Hitler topic but off topic for this particular thread. But since it's an active, lively thread, and I don't really want to start a new one for just this, I thought I'd bring it here.

I just saw a documentary on (I think) the History Channel that said Hitler was in love with his niece. There was evidence of his feelings, and he kept a close watch on her and became distraught after her suicide, etc. etc. The thing that struck me is that she appeared, from the picture, to be a brown-eyed brunette. I'm just wondering if she was because pictures can be deceiving. I find it odd that he would fall in love with a brunette being so blond oriented.