On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:33:47 +0200, Lin Clark <lin.w.clark@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Philip Jägenstedt
> <philipj@opera.com>wrote:
>>
>>
>> itemref is not only for shared properties, arguably the more important
>> use
>> case is for when the data is not all in a single subtree, e.g. as in
>> http://www.2gc.co.uk/a2gc-**people <http://www.2gc.co.uk/a2gc-people>
>>
>> Given that it's useful and implemented in both content (previous link)
>> and
>> implementations (Opera), why would we consider dropping it?
>>
>>
> If I'm not mistaken, they aren't talking about dropping it in microdata
> but
> instead are talking about not implementing it in RDFa... and in the case
> of
> properties not being in the same subtree in RDFa, the same 'about' value
> can
> be used to associate properties from two subtrees with the same subject.
Oh, OK :)
--
Philip Jägenstedt
Core Developer
Opera Software