Received: 31 August 2005 Accepted: 4 January 2006 Published online: 25 January 2006

Abstract Tumor cells act upon, and react to both their proximate and more distant environment, the mechanisms by which this is achieved being both autocrine and paracrine in nature. This interaction, however, takes place not only between adjacent malignant cells, but also non-malignant cells such as those of the immune system, the latter also partaking in the modeling of the tumor environment. Although tumor cells descend from normal tissue cells and thus bear in classical immunological terms ‘self signals’, it is evident that the immune system is able to recognize tumor cells as a harassment for the body and in consequence tries to eliminate these cells. On the counterpart, tumor cells acquire various characteristics which allow them to evade this immunological surveillance, and have been collectively coined with the term “tumor escape mechanisms”. This review will describe and summarize current understanding of tumor escape strategies, and also more closely elaborate on the modulatory role of the neuroendocrine system in the immune system–tumor cell interaction.
Keywords Tumor cell escape mechanisms - Neurotransmitters - Neoneurogenesis - Metastasis

Skytroll, I am starting to think you are right about the chemtrails having to withstand global warming, no wonder these fibers don't burn at 1600 degrees or higher.

Skytroll wrote:A Bandaid will not work for us Morgies, EVER!

London, I too want out of this too, but, one may have to move into a dry, not humid environment, that is where I always get better, and there is less Chemtrail spraying, also composed of silica coated "novel organisms". so the whole chemtrail operators are not who we think they are? Also combined efforts Nano in everything in molecules, atoms, particles DNA. Both natural and un natural.

Global warming is the front for all these operations when it was HAARP who blew the hole in the ozone.Chemtrails is a way to fix it, probably with some nuclear power thrown in, and alter earth so as to appear that global warming is happening. That is why all the "novel organisms" have to be created, so they are not truly natural and can survive in an un natural world.

BIG OPERATION isn't it? And is it Orion or Sirius that is coming or Jesus himself?

Do you think what we have to deterimine whether the natural silica is producing this, could work just like a nanosilica wire, or is it polymer material working with the silica?Since natural in it own state cannot be patented, then by mixing synthetic and natural, one can achieve production of products and say it is all natural, when it definitely is not.So, who other than Dr. Staninger, can test for these proving they are natural, in true state, or un-natural in a combined base?

I haven't given it any thought, Sky, but I will and then let you know.

I do wonder though about taking the DE (diametrous earth) as some posters (on the OTHER board) have recommended.

I will go away. Happily, just as soon as someone gives me the email or ph# or address of the big shot in the sky......

OH, BY THE WAY, THE HEADLINES IN THE DALLAS MORNING NEWSPAPER TODAY HAS A PHOTO OF THE MOON AND UNDER IT THE CAPTION READS
......NASA WANTS TO BUILD A PERMANENT LUNAR OUTPOST AS WAY STATION FOR SPACE EXPLORATION.......WHY DID'NT IT JUST SAY

hEY, SEND US SOME MORE OF YOUR MONEY YOU STUPID BLIND TAXPAYERS.....WE NEED IT TO COVER THE COST OF THE ALREADY BUILT
WAY STATION??????

STOP THE GD LIES.....YOU ARE THE EVIL ONE. LET ME OUT OF YOUR STUPID SURVEY.....

SKY,

THIS IN FROM 1995, THAT IS 11 YEARS AGO......

The International Conference Series on The Photochemical Conversion and Storage of Solar Energy (IPS) is surveyed from an historical perspective over all the conferences (including IPS-0) extending back to 1974. Each of nine themes is explored as it has developed (or not developed) and discussed in the context of possible applications to solar energy conversion and storage and to other non-solar applications. Finally, an assessment is made of each theme as to its importance (a) for fundamental studies, (b) for solar applications and (c) for other non-solar applications.

Last edited by London on Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:05 am, edited 1 time in total.