In living things molecular intelligence is seen controlling what self-assembles from the powerful Krebs Cycle that has become the core metabolic cycle of cells. It is the power plant and factory where a dozen or so catalytic molecules (protein, mineral or other) are drawn to metabolic pathway assembly lines that makes a copy of the molecule it started with every time around the circle. It does this by adding a non-chiral (structurally identical) mirror image of the starting molecule then when the cycle is completed it breaks in half resulting in two identical copies.

At any stage through the assembly cycle a molecule of proper fit may be drawn by molecular forces into a nearby self-assembly interaction to where it fits. At least part of the Reverse Krebs Cycle is catalyzed by volcanic clay/dust/mineral in sunlight making it possible that the cycle was once common planetary chemistry.[11][12]

Where there is no molecular intelligence present the Krebs Cycle would not be able to produce cells and exist regardless of molecular intelligence being present or not to control it. A rudimentary intelligence may actually be challenged to keep up with its production rate but not necessarily be destroyed by periods of overproduction.

Intelligence to exploit this cycle could easily form in its local environment. Once active it would have little problem controlling this existing metabolism. We can here predict self-assembly of a precellular starter mechanism that produces a genome from scratch, instead of a genome first being required to produce this intelligence.

Elsewhere, you've said that you are revising your text constantly. Is this the latest stable text that you have about the citric acid cycle?

Due to the extreme amount of work putting this theory together (and its politics) I only have time and resources for what most matters to science. Here's my latest project:

So let's put it another way: Is your statement that I quoted above about the citric acid cycle something that you feel is defensible? Or are you saying that it isn't, but you've been too busy to retract it?

The citric acid cycle — also known as the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle), the Krebs cycle, or the Szent-Györgyi–Krebs cycle[1][2] — is a….

If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right. :D

From my experience though, they are used interchangeably, even though where I have to look for differences can say that the chemistry varies in a way that the forward/reverse TCA of origin of life papers is a more simple way of achieving the present day Citric Acid Cycle and Krebs. They are otherwise the same to me. But since what you are describing is more of a details thing that’s maybe more a mission for you to improve the wording of.

Getting sidetracked on the Chromosome Illustrator project was the result of the paper also needing to better explain how “addressing” (as explained at Biology-Online) works, to make a molecular intelligence model relatively easy to program. It’s one of the things that I do have to focus my attention on, because of it being needed by all experimenting with the computer model and theory. But if you find a more precise way to word things then that will become the new priority and I will in minutes make the change so I can get back to work on what makes this theory unique, and scientifically valuable.

--------------The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

--------------The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

Great. Now "Laddy GaGa", the same shithead who's been posting this brain smegma at TalkRational for the last few months has discovered ATBC. Just fucking wonderful.

--------------"Science is what got us to the humble place weâ€™re at, and what hard-won progress we might realize comes from science, with ID completely flaccid, religious apologetics bitching from the sidelines." - Eigenstate at UD

This origin of intelligence theory explains the emergent origin of biological diversity and complexity of life on Earth (and detection of these features elsewhere in our Universe) as a product of intelligence, which here self-assembles from nonrandom behavior of matter into multiple self-similar levels of a four requirement cognitive system that over time learns (no select/selected/selection generalizations) and can take a guess (not take a mutation) and physically develops over a lifetime that for molecular intelligence lasts at least billions of years (hence the word evolve became redundant). The theory's unambiguous logical construct allowed for an operational definition for biological species that builds upon the standard accepted operational definition for chemical species, used in chemistry. This unified entire sciences such as Cognitive Theory, Cell Theory, Genetic Theory and Physics Theory including concepts from String Theory. And one requirement of this inherently controlling cognitive mechanism is a confidence level we consciously feel, which is vital to account for, for the theory to also be useful to artists, musicians, clergy and all interested in better knowing who and what we are, how we were created, and by process known as "chromosomal speciation" are related to a progenitor couple hereby colloquially named "Chromosomal Adam and Eve".

Great. Now "Laddy GaGa", the same shithead who's been posting this brain smegma at TalkRational for the last few months has discovered ATBC. Just fucking wonderful.

As I can see Occam's Aftershave rules here too. Have fun trying to stop us, you easily yanked wayward science-stopper troll you..

The Gary GaGa sequence and all else in science are doing fine right now with establishing base4 ACGT (here first four must be alphabetical order) and base5 ACGTN (with N the fifth base for an unknown) so at least get that right thank you.

--------------The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

This origin of intelligence theory explains the emergent origin of biological diversity and complexity of life on Earth (and detection of these features elsewhere in our Universe) as a product of intelligence, which here self-assembles from nonrandom behavior of matter into multiple self-similar levels of a four requirement cognitive system that over time learns (no select/selected/selection generalizations) and can take a guess (not take a mutation) and physically develops over a lifetime that for molecular intelligence lasts at least billions of years (hence the word evolve became redundant). The theory's unambiguous logical construct allowed for an operational definition for biological species that builds upon the standard accepted operational definition for chemical species, used in chemistry. This unified entire sciences such as Cognitive Theory, Cell Theory, Genetic Theory and Physics Theory including concepts from String Theory. And one requirement of this inherently controlling cognitive mechanism is a confidence level we consciously feel, which is vital to account for, for the theory to also be useful to artists, musicians, clergy and all interested in better knowing who and what we are, how we were created, and by process known as "chromosomal speciation" are related to a progenitor couple hereby colloquially named "Chromosomal Adam and Eve".

The theory makes sure to well credit Arnold Trehub and his book that has been my most valuable guide through the neuron level cognitive science. I computer modeled memory circuits from it and to spite its age is still holding up well in science. It's still an excellent (but unfortunately under-appreciated) resource that as you can see U-Mass is helping to make sure is there for you to read.

Along with all else I can't ask for much better than that, from a local academia that honestly has better things to do than join a crusade against what Arnold Trehub found true too, that the model in the Theory of Intelligent Design is much modeled from.

--------------The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

But on your thread, not here.

I have something I'm already working to help get that started. But first wanted to eliminate some of the quickly eliminated baggage that I thought best to leave behind in this one.

--------------The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

The circuit is what Arnold Trehub and David Heiserman described, that when combined together makes a simple yet awesome system.

--------------The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

Hey Gary this thread is not a place for you to shitpost. You shitpost in The Gary Gaulin Thread. Pretty please

What is wrong with Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC in a topic about Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC?

--------------The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.

Great. Now "Laddy GaGa", the same shithead who's been posting this brain smegma at TalkRational for the last few months has discovered ATBC. Just fucking wonderful.

As I can see Occam's Aftershave rules here too. Have fun trying to stop us, you easily yanked wayward science-stopper troll you..

Us? You and the turd in your pocket?

--------------"Science is what got us to the humble place weâ€™re at, and what hard-won progress we might realize comes from science, with ID completely flaccid, religious apologetics bitching from the sidelines." - Eigenstate at UD

Gary, if you visit Uncommon Descent and speak to Kairosfocus he may allow you to present your theory for discussion. All the finest minds in ID post there and they might enjoy helping to debug and refine your work.

Gary, if you visit Uncommon Descent and speak to Kairosfocus he may allow you to present your theory for discussion. All the finest minds in ID post there and they might enjoy helping to debug and refine your work.

Smithers - Release the hounds!

--------------Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

"If you can show that it is wrong, then I would first have to blame it on Wikipedia, before agreeing that you are right."

SIG worthy!

--------------...after reviewing the arguments, Iâ€™m inclined to believe that the critics of ENCODEâ€™s bold claim were mostly right, and that the proportion of our genome which is functional is probably between 10 and 20%. --Vincent Torley, uncommondescent.com 1/1/2016

For those of you who live in the Seattle area (which now includes me), the “Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club” are hosting an event on the 28th of November from 7pm till 9pm in Lake Hills Library (15590 Lake Hills Blvd, Bellevue, WA). Here’s the event description from the website:

Has Denyse fled Canada? Is the Toronto Based Journalist™ now a damnyankee? Has her Coffee!! habit become so all powerful and consuming that she's moved to The Source of All Things Caffeine™? Does anybody care? Link

I have a nephew who lives in Seattle. I must warn him immediately.

On the bright side, if Denyse stays away from Toronto until the spring stunting season, then the EdgeWalk will finally be safe for decent people.

Edited by CeilingCat on Nov. 01 2012,03:09

--------------...after reviewing the arguments, Iâ€™m inclined to believe that the critics of ENCODEâ€™s bold claim were mostly right, and that the proportion of our genome which is functional is probably between 10 and 20%. --Vincent Torley, uncommondescent.com 1/1/2016

Gary, if you visit Uncommon Descent and speak to Kairosfocus he may allow you to present your theory for discussion. All the finest minds in ID post there and they might enjoy helping to debug and refine your work.

Gary "Giggles" Gaulin is convinced he is "doing science" - indeed, he is adamant that, once his "Theory" is more widely published, it will unseat mainstream science in all sorts of areas.He might be welcome in KF's world - he is invariably polite, and virtually impervious to insult - and to being educated. Furthermore he is expert at the "wall-o'-text" approach, although much of it is written in Giggles's -er- idiosyncratic English, which is impenetrable to us benighted folk, who generally act as if words have commonly accepted meanings.Sadly, he is doomed to be one of the "Most Misunderstood" folks of all time

For those of you who live in the Seattle area (which now includes me), the “Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club” are hosting an event on the 28th of November from 7pm till 9pm in Lake Hills Library (15590 Lake Hills Blvd, Bellevue, WA). Here’s the event description from the website:

Has Denyse fled Canada? Is the Toronto Based Journalist™ now a damnyankee? Has her Coffee!! habit become so all powerful and consuming that she's moved to The Source of All Things Caffeine™? Does anybody care? Link

I have a nephew who lives in Seattle. I must warn him immediately.

On the bright side, if Denyse stays away from Toronto until the spring stunting season, then the EdgeWalk will finally be safe for decent people.

...the “Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club”

BOTH Analytics AND Philosophy??

I suppose that means they don't drink beer.

Sounds a bit iffy to me.

If the SAPC are having tea and cucumber sandwichs with ID spruikers instead of doing hard philosophy then they're wasting their time.

The MP boys analyzed Philosophy and found a fair amount of taking the piss.

Quote

Immanuel Kant was a real pissant Who was very rarely stable. Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar Who could think you under the table.David Hume could out-consumeWilhelm Freidrich Hegel,And Wittgenstein was a beery swineWho was just as schloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya''Bout the raising of the wrist.SOCRATES, HIMSELF, WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED...John Stuart Mill, of his own free will,On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.Plato, they say, could stick it away;Half a crate of whiskey every day.Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle,Hobbes was fond of his dram,And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart: "I drink, therefore I am"Yes, Socrates, himself, is particularly missed;A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed!

For those of you who live in the Seattle area (which now includes me), the “Seattle Analytic Philosophy Club” are hosting an event on the 28th of November from 7pm till 9pm in Lake Hills Library (15590 Lake Hills Blvd, Bellevue, WA). Here’s the event description from the website:

Has Denyse fled Canada? Is the Toronto Based Journalist™ now a damnyankee? Has her Coffee!! habit become so all powerful and consuming that she's moved to The Source of All Things Caffeine™? Does anybody care? Link

I have a nephew who lives in Seattle. I must warn him immediately.

On the bright side, if Denyse stays away from Toronto until the spring stunting season, then the EdgeWalk will finally be safe for decent people.

The IDiotic discotute is in Seattle.

dense o'leary the IDiot now lives in Seattle.

Coincidence, or by design?

--------------Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27