jb wrote:Peeker, WTF are you talking about with Lane o any insider info from another board?

And hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

What insider info? It was posted here or on C-Town somewhere in the clusterfuck of Browns threads that Lane said the Browns didn't have Weeden in their 1st round group. Maybe bowwwwowww?

And you told me Lane is never wrong. He got TRich right.

Adding 2+2 is all.

I think you got 2 + x is all I am suggesting.

Jake Locker and Christian Ponder set the market. QB values get inflated. You know that.

Nah. I respect the few fellas on C-Town sports who I go to read. I think they got it right on the board thing and you did too on TRich thing.

And yeah, I understand on the QB thing. Just think they would have, end of day, been better off taking their RG3 disappointment and putting that in their pocket and walking away from that position this season.

I hope he's an older Aaron Rodgers when he gets a couple years in and learns the league.

There are still people that charge people to say they're an insider out there.

A lot of people I like and respect, like JB and others, swear by Lane. If dude has a business model that works that's cool for him. I don't and never have had an account there.

And the info that I referred to wasn't OBR material and it wasn't even a quote.

It was stated by someone in passing on C-Town that Lane said the Browns didn't have Weeden in their first round.

This is an issue because JB and I disagree. This is how we handle that. I make sarcastic, condescending remarks and he calls me an expert because of the greymatter blog and then he tells me to stop posting insider stuff here that's not actually insider stuff.

I hope no one at the bar mentions Lane's board or thoughts. It'll suck to not be able to talk about them here. (That's another bit of sarcasm that will piss off JB)