Correspondence with Vig

Allow me to begin on a note of pleasant amusement and say: “the plot thickens.” Second, you do me great honour with your flattery – that you should choose to dissect my thinking so carefully suggests there is something in it worth saving, in your estimation. I shall endeavour to strengthen my resolve accordingly.

Third, and most importantly, you need not worry about the structural integrity of my endurance. Saying that makes my next statement all the more ironic. What I write hereafter should not be taken as an argument against your person, nor a derision of your points. To me, this correspondence equivocates the like of the ideological consensus building that our models of the Reich began so long ago at the turn of the previous century. So, let this to the best of my abilities stand as the last “baroque flourish” of this response. With that, I begin.

I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment of my writing style. It is better suited to creative writing, as this is my innate drive. Poetic license is one of the many arenas in which I feel competent. I will take as best I can your advice in stride.

If we in this merry band of misfit matchmakers cannot incorporate or otherwise deal with constructive criticism then we have already lost the battle – if indeed we were fighting for anything at all.

Your representation of my essay is poignant and concise. And I apologise if my verbosity caused you difficulty in borrowing my thoughts.

To begin again, as it goes. Allow me to better clarify my position on the East. In a separate correspondence with Reinhard Jim I had embellished my belief that the Eastern and Western paradigms represent separate quarters of the same Truth. It lies in the expressed aesthetic to describe them. As we know, I could go into great length describing the corollaries, but shall not here.

You place your meat and potatoes on the tray by opening with questioning. You ask “why” of a great many things. I would respond thusly: “why ask why?” I realise it is rhetorical, but the majority of us have a sense of the problem. We here know the painful price of the American dream. It is precisely this reason why Americans turn to their ethnic roots. They do this because the thirst for meaning, self-definition through aesthetic, drives them to.

You then posit that one must cultivate a physical presence to illuminate the aesthetic. This is true. But my point of contention is that in this case, the chicken cannot either precede or proceed the egg. They must arrive simultaneously.

Succinctly, there is no point in striving for physical and mental superiority if there is nothing to suit that personal imperiality. Conversely, an aesthetic drive is utterly wasted on those without any aesthetic sensibility. Point in case: you will not see the “ugly Americans” that Kyle laments on a regular basis frequent a fine-arts exhibit, not accompany me to worship at the altars of sound composed by Grieg.

Our origin must be unitive. I realise that by nature, all things are dualistic. However, the National-Socialist model, which came closest in terms of aesthetics to the kind of ascendency we require, did so by Hegelian synthesis. Nationalist and Socialist were polar opposites, yet now they are often spoken of as one, joined by the hyphen clause. So it must be with our aesthetic revolution. The physical and spiritual must necessarily inform each-other, for this to occur one cannot wait on the other lest procrastination rear its frightening head.

Your assessment of the Industrial “Revolution” is music to my ears. There is nothing to add to that. It should surprise you, then, to learn that I have no prevailing disagreement with your spiritual diagnoses. In a separate correspondence with Comrade Reinhard Jim, I had further illustrated my belief that Eastern (Aryan) and Western (Aryan) spiritual paradigms arose from the same centrifugal locus. I reposit that assessment here for your judgement.

“Eastern” and “Western” spiritualties are nothing more than aesthetic flavour added to a cauldron. They describe the same Truth. They utilise differentiated terms and themes with which to do so. Careful mapping of ancient Norse and ancient Hindu mythological script shows that the trends are nearly identical. This same exegetic approach can in turn be applied to all European traditions. Even Christianity is not without Aryan influence, as Rosenberg hypothesised.

My seeming concentration against Eastern aesthetic is not one of hostility. I do not want to ban it. Nor anything. But my perception, correct or not, is that it is fetishized by current breeds of White Nationals. This is problematic because it retards the growth of the individual Ethnonationalist. I make the same concession for my own prized Western paradigm, culminating in the Anglo-Saxon mystique.

You might not fathom how uncomfortable this concession makes me, as to me, the preservation and upholstery of Anglo-Saxon heritage, and the synthesis of a continuous Anglo-Saxon race, is my only purpose. However, to achieve that end, a greater Aryan unity must be upheld. Should ascendency be gained of any one flavour of aesthetic, than that means the doom of those it replaces.

In a short-hand sense, to relegate the tribal divisions to mere evolutionary facts is no boon to us. For the Germanic way to be replaced by the Hindu is little different, in my reckoning, than the White species to be replaced by the hordes of undeveloped races at our doors. The reason we fight is to preserve an idea, our idea is informed by what we see. What we see is our cultures. These are they that produce all we are.

If Eastern mysticism becomes the driving force that drives our next revolution, than that is what labels us. The issue with that is this: Eastern mysticism comes with Eastern baggage. It will be rejected by many, and rightly so, for it is inclusive and demanding, as is its God(s) given right. Point in case: the ironic biography of Savitri Devi. Do you want to see a race of Devis? Frankly, I do not. I enjoy her writing, her style. But the Eastern aesthetic, promulgated and dogmatised, as many lean toward doing, as they always have, will give many indigestion simply because people by their own rite tend toward adopting things, it is easy to lose much more in translation. And that’s only if the Eastern lure sets as good bait.

In the Renegade crowd it has already become a point of stringent contention. David in Texas with his Satanism. The degree to which he dogmatised this systematic faith burnt those that could not digest it – he did not offer his opinions, he hammered them. We have also lost Lugh to any number of inconsistently organised factors. Both these men have phased out over arguably piddly and lamentable nothings. Callers make points to complain about the use of terms like “Kali Yuga.” They do this because, to them, to see their own lingo and jargon replaced by these is no different than their race being replaced by the Mud People.

Do I agree with their conclusions? No. I adore Eastern mysticism. But it cannot be the imperial mandate. Which returns me to my original point. A new, incorporative, and non-comittal race based system should be erected. That way a “weltanschaung” can be drawn up from its waters.

Now. Allow me to come to the crux of my response. Since I am far more interested in forming consensus than forming division, I am intrigued by your scientific findings.

You note that dance, rhythm and movement can be utilised. I believe this is important. This should be stressed. It is an angle I would have never fathomed. That is truly uplifting and inspiring data, which, you can rest assured, I will incorporate into my personal life.

Could we perhaps agree that a direct and immediate implementation of an aesthetic programme might include therapeutic motion training? Runic/Yogic principles have been used to varying degrees of laudable success in fostering physio-spiritual optimisation. If what you say is true, we can literally move into a New Age. THAT alone is worthy of aesthetic meditation.

While I realise that your (and frankly my) bias against Christianity might grieve you against this next assertion. However, in my life, some of the strongest Christ-followers have been also skilled interpretive dancers. Would synthesising a stress on dance, or personal rhythm satisfy your scientific angle?

Also inviolably necessary is cultivation of emotional strength. This appears to be a chink in our armour. We are very emotionally vulnerable and tend to overcompensate in retaliation. This leads to undo aggression and infighting which make us no different than the enemy we fight, except that it leaves us less defensible.

In building off your science, I would also posit that we might adopt a stance regarding personal aesthetic also. By that I mean physical posture, in our post-industrial world, children are developing into the early forms of hunch-back due to chronic computer overuse and underactivity. Also, the lack of discipline in early education depreciates personal responsibility.

That concludes my response. I hope you find it more compositionally pleasing than my former presentations, as I have made attempts to conscientise your advice.

In conclusion, I wish to reiterate my gratitude for the opportunity to engage you in such a formal exchange. This is the way it should be with this movement. By diversifying our talent pools we can only increase our efficiency. Being well-aware of my own weaknesses, I freely confess that my creative talents require direction. Because I think on multiple levels it is remarkably easy for me to be lost in my own thoughts, which it seems reflects more adroitly in my writing than I had at first suspected. Ideally I would be a member of a cabinet ministry and would write under tutelage of a department head who could direct the aims of his staff. Something to plan for in the future, mayhaps.

Leave a Reply

Why shucks, Comrade Seaxwulf, all of them big words that you always be usin’ is too much for an old country boy from the backwoods of Tennessee like me. I know that you is a highly edjukated feller, but us common folk just don’t understand a lot of them great ideas that you is alluz comin’ up with. Them thar ideas that you gots is mighty fine, but you jes’ can;t expect all us us fellers and gals with not a lot of formal edjukashun to get the total meaning of the great idears that you alluz… Read more »

But seriously, I intend to keep writing as ideas come to me. We’re starting to see a lot of diversity in the White Nationalist scene. Hopefully when there’s enough of it, it’ll pound out the rough edges, we’ll meet in the middle and create a movement to last – and cut the goddamn infighting right the hell out of the equation!

I am glad that you have extrapolated something of value from my overarching rants.

I meant to comment on your work elsewhere, but have been strapped for time. I like your style, and do stick around. We NEED with a emphasis on capitalisation, critical thinkers in the movement. We have a lot of meat, but the smarmy Englishman in me wants his potatoes.

Yes Reinhard , yes Carmen our dear friend Seaxwulf is a lofty guy and I promised him a reply on his article! I told him also that my brain has to work quite hard to figure out what he means!!! That why it took me a few days to answer which I am going to do now underneath here.

Hello Seaxwulf, You really took my advice to heart and your line of thought is much clearer to me now, although some poor guys have still problems with it. There is really not any statement of yours that I feel obliged to argue about because fundamentally we share the same vision I see. About this issue of movement quality , dance and body culture I will come back in an article about art, because I need to explain that better. What shines trough however in your words is that you are concerned about how our vision should… Read more »

Vig, Indeed you will read my comments. For now, I have two questions. First, since I am now confident that we have a sense of each-other’s motives, I know now that I don’t stand to offend. What is your attraction to Eastern flavour? Many share it. I am attracted to the truths that this flavour describes, but prefer to affix Western language to those (stunning) truths so as to make it more palatable. I find the actual language and aesthetic to be foreign and clumsy. This, however, is only my Modus Operandi, which many do not share.… Read more »

Hello Paul, It is very simple. I am only interested in truth, also non scientific. I know that I know only myself and I dont exactly know what others see as truth. Truth is established in me by inquiry and experimental testing and verification. I am not attracted to Eastern flavour per se, but when eastern flavour leads me to an experience that western flavour has never given me than I take it serious. It has nothing to do with the name that is affixed to it by a culture . Dont be misguided by names and… Read more »