Waiting for location permission...

Broadcast and play with friends

Waiting for location permission...

This site uses Cookies for basic functionality for visitors who have accounts with us. Also, our trusted and reputable third party advertisers use cookies to determine which ads to serve.

We care a lot about your privacy and making sure that your experience on this site is a safe one, and in that effort we store as little information as possible. You can read more about that in our 2018 GDPR statement here.

Please accept our terms of use which can be found here. If you have any questions, or you do not agree and would like us to opt you out, please contact us using the contact form.

Cinder Glade Discussion

4 days ago

Something I have found to work with my Dino’s is Farseek plus Canopy Vista and Cinder Glade. I put a fair number of Basic Forest in for them (I’m leaning mainly G/R+w). I’ll often find if the game is going much past turn 6, I’ll have two basics out for sure and then those dual “battle” lands come in untapped.

Another interesting land choice I am loving is Desert. Ping Ripjaw or Ranging, ping their creature each turn. Lots of versatility for that card in this specific deck.

Creature wise I have many thoughts on that front. For now I would try 4 Thrashing Brontodon. It’s a great body being a 3/4 and with your heavy lean towards Dino cost reduction, will likely be just GG every game. Then in the pinch you have that convenience of sacking to get rid of a problem artifact or enchantment.

I’ve got many other thoughts on this deck type from my testing. Last but not least, one of my newer testing cards Skarrg, the Rage Pits.

6 days ago

Something I have found to work with my Dino’s is Farseek plus Canopy Vista and Cinder Glade. I put a fair number of Basic Forest in for them (I’m leaning mainly G/R+w). I’ll often find if the game is going much past turn 6, I’ll have two basics out for sure and then those dual “battle” lands come in untapped.

Another interesting land choice I am loving is Desert. Ping Ripjaw or Ranging, ping their creature each turn. Lots of versatility for that card in this specific deck.

Creature wise I have many thoughts on that front. For now I would try 4 Thrashing Brontodon. It’s a great body being a 3/4 and with your heavy lean towards Dino cost reduction, will likely be just GG every game. Then in the pinch you have that convenience of sacking to get rid of a problem artifact or enchantment.

I’ve got many other thoughts on this deck type from my testing. Last but not least, one of my newer testing cards Skarrg, the Rage Pits.

6 days ago

Something I have found to work with my Dino’s is Farseek plus Canopy Vista and Cinder Glade. I put a fair number of Basic Forest in for them (I’m leaning mainly G/R+w). I’ll often find if the game is going much past turn 6, I’ll have two basics out for sure and then those dual “battle” lands come in untapped.

Another interesting land choice I am loving is Desert. Ping Ripjaw or Ranging, ping their creature each turn. Lots of versatility for that card in this specific deck.

Creature wise I have many thoughts on that front. For now I would try 4 Thrashing Brontodon. It’s a great body being a 3/4 and with your heavy lean towards Dino cost reduction, will likely be just GG every game. Then in the pinch you have that convenience of sacking to get rid of a problem artifact or enchantment.

I’ve got many other thoughts on this deck type from my testing. Last but not least, one of my newer testing cards Skarrg, the Rage Pits.

2 weeks ago

I feel your pain, hahaha. I have 20 commander decks at the moment, and at any given time I have 2-3 possible new deck ideas going through my head.

I think what you should do depends alot on how, where, and with who you play against most often. If you play mostly with a group of friends and have your own meta, you could check with them to see if they mind you using proxies. That way you can test out new decks without having to buy a whole bunch of new cards. But if you play at your LGS they may frown upon using proxies like this.

It also depends on whether you want your decks to be more competitive, or if you're happy with how they play. Commander as a format is alot more about fun over winning than other formats. I personally enjoy performing the more weird and unique synergies and convoluted 4-5 card combos in commander, rather than using the best and most competitive cards available, or using the typical 2 card combos you see everywhere (like Deadeye Navigator + Palinchron).

Magic the Gathering, FNM is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved. This site is unaffiliated. Articles and comments are user-submitted and do not represent official endorsements of this site.