SOS e - Clarion Of Dalit

IT IS A FORUM TOWARDS PROTECTING THE CIVIL , HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE OPPRESSED - DALITS , MINORITIES & TRIBALS.The Criminal - Police - Politician - Judge - Criminals Nexus is trying to silence me in many ways. If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA together with jurisdictional police & District Magistrate will be responsible for it.
Secure Mail : Naag@torbox3uiot6wchz.onion

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Contempt by MPs MLAs

Dalit’s Diary - eNews Weekly

Working For The Rights & Survival Of TheOppressed

Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R…VOL.11 issue.47…… . 06 / 12 / 2017

Editorial
: Contempt of Houseby MPsMLAs , no punishment ?

-An appeal to Speaker
of Loksabha & all state legislative assemblies

As per constitution of india , Law is above
all. All Indians are subservient to it , nobody not even MLAs , MPs , Ministers
are great & above law ? All citizens of india are equal & have equal
rights. Constitution ofIndia has given
certain specific privilegesto MPs ,
MLAs , Ministers& Judgesto perform their constitutional duties freely
without interruptions. It has not given themprivilegesto escape from legal
prosecution. Howeverfew MPs , MLAs ,
Judges are misusing privileges to escape from accountability , legal
prosecution. They are PUBLICSERVANTSnotPUBLICMASTERS.

We have utmost respect to all constitutional
institutions & Public servants. But we haveright to question accountability of all
constitutional institutions & public servants. In few cases contempt of
house , degradation of house standards isdone by members of house themselves. They use derogatory ,
unparliamentary language against each other , don’t respect the findings of
house committees and don’t act uponhouse committees recommendations , engage in fisticuffs with each other
, still no criminal legal prosecution , contempt proceedings against such
members who have brought down house standards , why ? Silence of speaker of
house in all such cases is emboldening such deviant MPs , MLAsto commit more such crimes , therefore
speaker of such house is also guilty of indirectly aiding such members.

WhenMPs , MLAs fail to live up to their oath of office & commit contempt
of constitution of india , contemptof
house , contempt of Indian citizens , what contempt proceedings against such
MPs , MLAs ?

7) Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the
constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal
or below ?

8) Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of
commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of
records ?

9) Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the
Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of
Lords in England ?

10) Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or
court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of
accountability of constitutional functionaries ?

11) Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to
nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples
representatives & executive ? does not it amount to infringement of
Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.

12) Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional
duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?

13) Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in
the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official's secret
act & go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal
immunity privileges ?

14) Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court
Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their
privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed
and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?

15) By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the
legislature and Parliament out of tax payer's money, they get their pay, perks
& lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is
above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more
valid in a democracy ?

16) Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by
voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &
lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen,
fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge /
constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?

17) If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up
that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a
solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the
field (vacuum) ?

18) While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his
own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to
be judges in their own cause ?

19) Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to
a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?

21) Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as
the Public Interest Litigation" ? In some cases, the Public or the person
representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free
legal aid is given ?.

22) What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?

23) Communication - free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why
the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of
Citizens ?

A B C D of Democracy – A Lesson for all people’s representativesHOW MPs ,MLAs , Ministers - PEOPLE’S REPRESENTATIVES MUST
FUNCTION People are the kings , self rulers in a democracy .
Peoples representatives must just represent the wishes , aspirations of
people. When people in Jaitapur , Maharashtra state of India
are totally against a nuke plant in their area and they don’t want it ,
still the authorities are forcing this project over their head. Since 63 years of independence ,
In India the learned IAS babus & Netas are forcing their agendas
, SEZs , Projects over the people for their own selfish gains , against the
wishes of people. This is not DEMOCRACY.In india, indirect democracy is the form of governance. In
this form, people's representatives are bound to raise the questions , issues
concerning their constituents on their behalf , on the floor of the house.
However the sad part in india even after 63 years of
democracy , is the lobbying is at it's peak. The lobbying is a gentleman's
white collared crook's way of forming favour seeker's group , creating a corpus
to pay lumpsum bribe & influencing decision making.
The people's representatives are bound to represent their people first , then
their party & party think tanks. India has come to this sorry
state of affairs , widespread corruption , huge black economy & rampant
poverty, all due to inefficient legislations & enforcements.
These think tanks & IAS lobby, consider themselves as most super brains on
earth & gives out suggestions . the present state of affairs is a barometer
of their brilliance. These think tanks & IAS lobby are the hand maidens of
lobbyists / bribers.

Now consider the following example :
Mr.raj gandhi is a member of parliament from mandya constituency in karnataka
state. He is a MBA graduate & member of ruling Indian progressive party.
The multinational giant M/S GREY HOUND CORPORATION wants to enter into paper manufacturing
business in india. It's sight falls on the public sector paper giant
mandya national paper mills (MNPM) in mandya district of karnataka. The MNC
effectively lobbies with the government. The ruling party think tank & the
cabinet advisory group recommends to the government to make strategic
disinvestment in the PSU M/S MNPM. They bring out graph with full power point
presentation stating that it is good for the company as well as the government.
The lobbyists follows it up with media reports on the positive aspect of
strategic disinvestment. A favourable impression is created in the minds of
literate public. The cabinet
committee okays it.

The " strategic dis investment issue " comes before the parliament
for legislation / approval. The ruling party issues a party whip to it's
members to vote in favour of dis investment. However M.P mr.raj gandhi who is
an MBA in his own wisdom also favours the dis investment. However ,most
importantly the constituents – people in mandya parliamentary constituency
through protest marches , mass post card campaigns lakhs in numbers expresses
their disagreement with the dis investment & urges their MP mr.gandhi to
vote against the disinvestment legislation.

On the D-day in parliament , mr. Raj gandhi as per his party whip & his own
wisdom votes in favour of strategic disinvestment legislation, much against the
wishes of his people , constituents & mis represents them in parliament.
the democracy has failed here. in This way democracy is being derailed since 62
years in india.

In democracy, party whip , MP or MLA's own wisdom / brilliance, think tank
& IAS lobby recommendations are all secondary , the constituent's of his
constituency , people's wishes aspirations are of primary importance &
supreme. What people need is a honest
representative, who simply delivers the people's aspirations on the floor of
the house back & forth , without superimposing it with his own ideas &
party ideas. For true democracy , the people's representatives must be true
postmans.

Towards this end , the people must be educated about their democratic rights
& responsibilities. This is an appeal to the honest few in the parliament
& state legislatures to weed out their corrupt colleagues , lobbyists, to
uphold the dignity of the house & to install democracy in it's true form.

MPs shame India, vandalise Parliament over Telangana

They
streamed out, in quick succession, holding handkerchiefs to their noses. Some
emerged with their eyes watering. Others were coughing. The evacuation followed
a liberal spritzing of pepper spray inside parliament by law-maker L
Rajagopal. (Track LIVE updates here)

A little after 12 pm, an ambulance tore away, its siren blaring the coda to
what had unfolded inside the Lok Sabha. A glass table-top had been smashed. A
mic had been yanked from a table and flung. And Mr Rajagopal, age 49, had
sprung with his aerosol can in a scrum of parliamentarians fighting in the
centre or the Well of the House. Reports that a knife had been pulled by an MP
added to the chaos. (First pepper spray, then gas masks in Parliament: 10
developments)

Three parliamentarians were moved to hospital complaining of burning eyes. A
fourth was admitted for severe chest pains.

The five-minute riot in Parliament was constructed by those who say they will
not allow Parliament to discuss or vote on the proposal that bifurcates
Andhra Pradesh by carving out one of its three regions, Telangana, as a new
southern state. The architects of today's violence were unrepentant. "Why
should I apologize?" asked Venugopal Reddy, who is a member of the Telugu
Desam Party. "The government should apologize for the Telangana
bill," he said defiantly, while rejecting allegations that he brandished a
knife during the clashes. "I pulled out a mic," he said, with a sense
of accomplishment. (Watch)

Politicians opposed to a Telangana state have been bingeing on bad behaviour
since this Parliament session began on February 5, but today's exhibit of total
anomie is unprecedented in the history of the Indian Parliament. "They
have shamed India, they have shamed us," said Speaker Meira Kumar, who
later suspended 16 lawmakers for the violence. (Acted in self-defense, says L Rajagopal, the
'pepper-spray MP')

The move to downsize Andhra Pradesh, designed as vote-bait before the national
election by the Congress, has proven so far to be a gross miscalculation,
resulting in strident dissent from its own chief minister, Kiran Kumar Reddy.
Like other politicians who want the plan nixed, his constituency lies in the
non-Telangana regions of Seemandhra, which will form the residuary state.

The Congress needs the support of the BJP to push the Telangana proposal
through Parliament before it wraps on February 21. The BJP had so far suggested
it would back the bill if the Congress could ensure order in Parliament to
allow for a debate, and if the government made special financial provisions to
help Seemandhra, which is worried about a smaller share of water, power and
revenue from Telangana once the new state is created.

After today's debacle, the BJP said the government has lost the right to try
and clear any legislation other than the interim budget.

Two BJP MLAs accused of watching porn in Gujarat assembly

REUTERS - The image of India's
politicians took another beating on Wednesday after two Bharatiya Janata Party
(BJP) MLAs were accused of watching pornography in the Gujarat assembly, just
weeks after three Karnataka lawmakers were caught viewing obscene videos and
resigned.

News channels broadcast footage on
Wednesday showing Shankarbhai Chaudhary allegedly watching porn on a tablet
computer with his colleague Jethabhai Bharwad while sitting in the state
assembly.

Both politicians said the reports were
"baseless".

"Nothing of this sort
happened," Chaudhary told reporters. "This is being done to malign
me."

Outrage over the incident, with a dose
of mockery, fuelled updates on social media, with ‘#porngate', ‘BJP MLAs' and
‘Gujarat Assembly' trending on Twitter in India.

Three BJP MLAs in Karnataka, including
a women's affairs minister, resigned in February after being caught watching
pornography on a mobile phone during a state assembly session.

Porn row: Three BJP ministers resign,
barred from Assembly

A day
after being caught on camera watching a porn clip in the Karnataka Assembly,
three BJP ministers resigned today after an embarrassed party leadership
cracked the whip.

A red-faced BJP swiftly went into a
damage control mode asking Cooperation Minister Laxman Savadi and Women and
Child Development Minister C C Patil to quit while Minister for Ports, Science
and Technology Krishna Palemar was axed for allegedly providing the blue film
to them.

The three ministers were also barred
by Speaker K G Bopaiah from attending proceedings of the Assembly till a House
inquiry committee submits report on March 12.

In his ruling, Bopaiah asked the three
to give an explanation by February 13 and their reply would be placed before
the proposed six-member inquiry committee, comprising two members each from
BJP, Congress and JDS.

Till then, the three are barred from
attending the Assembly, Bopaiah said in his order as the unsavoury episode
rocked the House and provided a fodder to the opposition to take on the ruling
party.

Savadi and Patil were caught on camera
yesterday while they were viewing the porn video footage inside the state
assembly during the proceedings, an incident that battered the image of the
Sadananda Gowda Government and BJP and triggering widespread condemnation
across the state.

"We don't want the party and the
government to face further embarrassment. All of us have decided to resign. We
have handed over our resignation letters to Chief Minister with a request to
accept it," Savadi, Patil and Palemar told reporters. Savadi claimed they
have done no wrong.

The direction to the ministers to quit
came after the BJP summoned the trio and told them to put in their papers at a
meeting attended by top leaders including Gowda, state BJP President KS
Eswarappa and former chief minister B S Yeddyurappa.

The meeting took place close on the
heels of BJP President Nitin Gadkari speaking to Gowda and Eswarappa and
directing them to initiate action against the three ministers, party sources
said.

Losing no time after the ministers
fell in line, Chief Minister DV Sadananda forwarded the resignations to
Governor HR Bhardwaj who accepted them immediately but that did not satisfy the
opposition which created a big ruckus in the assembly demanding the
disqualification of the three as MLAs.

BJP Government, already hit by a
series of corruption charges, faced acute embarrassment as the fresh
controversy exploded in its face after regional TV channels, which recorded the
act of the ministers flipping through the porn clippings on their mobile
phones, aired the footage yesterday.

Sadananda Gowda said the three
ministers had sought a probe into the issue as they maintain that they only
watched a clipping that was sent to their mobile and were confident of proving
their innocence.

After meeting the party leaders, the
three described themselves as "loyal soldiers of the party" and said,
"We do not want to further embarrass the government and the party... But
we have not committed any crime".

The exit of the ministers did not
satisfy an agressive opposition which also demanded registering criminal cases
against them apart from summary disqualification.

Speaker's announcement of a committee
to probe the issue also failed to pacify the agitated opposition members with
the Congress announcing boycott of the panel.

"Why should there be a committee.
They have admitted to watching the clips. Please disqualify them,"
Opposition Congress leader Siddaramaiah insisted and staged dharna in the
company of JDS members in the House.

The incident led to curtailing of the
assembly session by two days, as Bopaiah adjourned it sine die.

"Yes the incident has embarrassed
the party", Eswarappa admitted even as Gowda maintained that the three
ministers resigned on their "own".

Karnataka witnessed protests at
several places by Congress activists who condmened the incident.

With the exit of three more ministers,
the list of BJP Ministers in the state who have made dishonourable exit in the
last four years has risen to seven.

The present row has brought down the
strength of the Gowda ministry to 24, leaving 10 ministerial vacancies.

The central leadership showed the door
to BS Yeddyurappa based on the Lokayukta report on illegal mining.

Former minister SN Krishnaiah Setty
had to resign from the Yeddyurappa ministry after he faced charges of land
scam, followed by Katta Subramanya Naidu on similar allegations while rape
charges forced H Halappa to quit as minister.

Two Karnataka ministers caught
watching porn film in assembly

BANGALORE: Two BJP ministers in
Karnataka - Lakshman Savdi and C C Patil - were allegedly caught watching porn
film clips on the former's mobile phone on the floor the state legislative
assembly on Tuesday. While Savdi holds the cooperatives' portfolio, Patil is the
minister for women and child development.

The ministers were caught in the act
even as the house was in the middle of a heated debate on the recent hoisting
of the Pakistani flag at Sindagi in Bijapur district. Close-up shots of the
ministers watching blue films were beamed on television channels in the evening
and sparked a furore. The television visuals showed both the ministers sitting
next to each other, gazing into Savdi's handset and bantering on. This is for
the first time that the Karnataka assembly is rocked by such a scandal.

Soon after the news broke, Opposition
leader Siddaramaiah and JD(S) leader YSV Datta demanded resignation of the
ministers. They said the ministers were elected by the people and such an act
is nothing short of an insult to the people. "Disgraceful. This should not
have happened," said D H Shankaramurthy, chairman of the legislative
council.

The issue expected to generate lot of
heat since the legislature will be in session up to Friday. Speaker K G Bopaiah
and both the ministers could not be reached immediately for comments.

The vohra committee report has proved the criminalisation of politics
in india. There are many number of criminals in the parliament &
state
legislatures. Some of those criminals are cabinet ministers as well as
members of vital parliamentary committees.
Thereby, they are in a
position to manipulate , enact laws favouring , benefitting the
criminals their cronies.
Just see how the GOI gave export incentive of Rs.1800 crore to
reliance petroleum although it didn't even export a barrel. Reliance
infocom & tata teleservices were CDMA mobile service providers &
have
paid license fee of few crores only equal to landline fees without any
competitive bidding . They were supposed to provide mobile service to
operate like fixed phones within a radius of 40k.m. however they were
providing service like mobile service from one state to another like
GSM mobile service providers. By this act of RIC & TTSL , the GSM
providers who have paid thousands of license fee in competitive
bidding were economically hurt , the dispute went to court. The court
was on the verge of pronouncing it's verdict awarding damages worth
Rs.18000 crore to GSM players & Rs. 3000 crore of license fees with
penalty to GOI. The government announced a unified telecom license
regime with retrospective effect. Thereby, the GOI lost thousands of
crores of rupees & the share holders of GSM players lost thousands of
crores. Onceagain the RIC was charged by PSU bsnl THAT RELIANCE IS
RE-ROUTING INTERNATIONAL CALLS AS LOCAL CALLS & SWINDLING THE GOI.
This time too, GOI bailed it out. during the dispute between ambani
brothers the younger ambani mr. Anil ambani director of reliance
himself has stated that for the favours received from the GOI , the
company gifted some shares to then IT &
COMMUNICATIONS MINISTER mr.Pramod mahajan. Various indian &
multinational companies are lootingindian exchequer to the tune of
thousands of crores of rupees , through lobbying / bribing.

In india, indirect democracy is the
form of governance. In this form,
people's representatives are bound to raise the questions , issues
concerning their constituents on their behalf , on the floor of the
house. However the sad part in india even after 58 years of democracy
, is the lobbying is at it's peak. The lobbying is a gentleman's white
collared crook's way of forming favour seeker's group , creating a
corpus to pay lumpsum bribe & influencing decision making. The
people's representatives are bound to represent their people first ,
then their party & party think tanks. India has come to this sorry
state of affairs , widespread corruption , huge black economy &
rampant poverty, all due to inefficient legislations & enforcements.
These think tanks & IAS lobby, consider themselves as most super
brains on earth & gives out suggestions . the present state of
affairs
is a barometer of their brilliance. These think tanks & IAS lobby are
the hand maidens of lobbyists / bribers.

When
everybody else does the mistake , wrong doing , indulges in corruption ,
judiciary alone must be pure like virgin to punish & guide the
wrong doers. Now , the apex court of the land & the highest judicial
officer of the land , the conscience keeper , protector of rights ,
Constitutional guardian of the land – The Honourable Chief Justice of
India himself Has been found guilty . SHAME SHAME.

These corrupt parasites will feel
, understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let
us pray to almighty – In whose Court of justice MATCH FIXING
is not there & every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these
corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.

Xeroxing
Corruption

By
Ashutosh Sinha
Special to India Resource Center
September 30, 2002

Not
many in India might have actually seen the field gun from Bofors AB, either
standing sentinel on the borders or in operation. The guns played a key role in
the skirmishes at Kargil in 1999. The same anonymity does not hold good for
Xerox, which has now entered the dictionary as a verb in its own right for
photocopying documents.

Since
its name has become synonymous with the allegations of kickbacks, few companies
would like to be compared with Bofors. But since the deal was a big commercial
success for arms dealers, some companies would, perhaps, be tempted to employ
the same tactics as the Bofors middlemen.

The
Swedish firm Bofors AB allegedly paid Rs.640 million ($13 million) in bribes to
middlemen to get the contracts for the deal signed in 1986. Nearly a decade
later, Enron India spent US$ 20 million in "educating" Indian
bureaucrats about the role of private companies in power generation, an euphemism
for bribes. Two telecom companies, Essar and Swisscom, were alleged to have
paid a former minister, Sukh Ram, a hefty amount during early 1996 to help
change the original license conditions, which it had signed with the Department
of Telecommunications. There was no case against Sukh Ram, simply because this
deal was never investigated.

Significantly,
none of the allegations made above have yet been proven in a court of law.

Xerox
India was treading on familiar path, something which its US headquarters got to
know later. According to the parent company's own admission, which emerged
during its audit, it paid over $600,000 as bribes to various government
employees to win contracts. In essence, the modus operandi was just a
'photocopy' of the way some other companies operate.

Under
the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), it is a serious criminal offence for
a US company to pay bribes in a foreign country to obtain contracts. Being
managed by the BK Modi group, one of Indias oldest family run business empires,
at the time when the bribes were paid, it is now like a sword hanging at the
neck of Xerox. The BK Modi group has denied having paid any bribes. Xerox
Modicorp Limited (as the company is now called) completes 19 years in India
this September. It changed its name from Modi Xerox Limited to Xerox Modicorp
Limited in 2000.

The
Indian government was quick to order an inquiry. A promise that accompanied the
order was that the inquiry would be completed in two weeks. Over a month later,
the two weeks are not yet over. Now, the million-dollar question - for a
company that calls itself 'The Document Company' - is there enough documentary
evidence to prosecute the company?

The
Department of Company Affairs (DCA), the arm of the government that wields the
stick to ensure that companies meet their stated objectives and do not dupe the
shareholders, is looking into the details. Xerox was not duping shareholders,
much the same way as the military hardware company AB Bofors. Both were, in
fact, trying to reward their shareholders by giving the extra edge to their
sales team by "taking care" of those taking a final decision on the
purchase of their products. DCA is still not sure whether the bribes were
actually paid or if the amount was pocketed by Modi or his men.

There
is a stark difference between the two cases, though. Bofors is a European
company, Xerox an American. Their products are proverbially as different as
chalk and cheese - one sold military hardware, the other office automation
products. While the Bofors payoffs involved the government official right at
the top in the government, the Xerox payoffs appear to have been made to the
operations level people in government. Besides, the nature of arms deals is
such that the best deal has to be sewn in one shot. Office automation products
are regularly purchased by companies and governments. So, if a few people can
be identified, their palms can be greased regularly to put the product. The
agents who helped Bofors are still trying to block investigations and any
information into their money laundering. The amount involved in the Xerox case
is far smaller.

Xerox,
however, does deserve a pat on the back for having the courage to admit the
payoffs in public.

There
are some parallels between the two companies. Bofors money found its way to
exotic places that you would find difficult to locate on the world map -
Luxembourg, Bahamas, Liechtenstein, Channel Islands. The Xerox India payoffs
did not have such exotic addresses. Two of the companies to which payments were
made had slum areas of Delhi as their addresses while two others were located
in the western Indian state of Gujarat.

While
the Bofors deal had strong political linkages, there is talk of the involvement
of a Samajwadi Party politician, who has interests in the paper business, in
the Xerox case. That allegation is yet to be probed, though.

AE
Services, Svenska, Lotus, Tulip and Mont Blanc are some of the names of bank
accounts that are associated with the alleged Bofors payoffs. The money has
gone into a variety of accounts before disappearing various pockets. Officials
of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), India's premier investigating
agency, suspect that these people include the late Win Chadha, an Italian
called Ottavio Quattrochchi and the Hinduja brothers. If the Xerox India deal
had been bigger, with international ramifications, it would not have chosen
names like Charu Paper Ltd., Chadha Paper Ltd., Pioneer Enterprises and Elite
Commercial Services.

At
the time when these bribes were paid, the company was controlled by the BK Modi
group, which owned majority shares in the joint venture. When Xerox acquired
control of the company (it now owns 68 per cent while BK Modi controls 28 per
cent in the joint venture) in 2000, it ordered an inspection of the books by
the audit firm PriceWaterhouseCoopers, which raised disturbing questions. The
audit firm said that it was not sure the organizations existed and, if they
did, who owns or controls them. BK Modi Group has interests in telecom,
entertainment and manufacturing.

Xerox
has over 50 per cent market share in photocopiers in India. 1998 was a landmark
year for the photocopier industry. Of the estimated 40,000 machines sold that
year, an estimated 27,000 were Xerox machines. However, that was an aberration
and nearly 30,000 machines are sold in the market each year at present. Nearly
60 per cent of the sales are made to government organisations.

Incidentally,
the bribes are alleged to have been paid in 1998 and 1999. In 1998, the 15-year
tie-up between Modis and Xerox ended. Xerox had entered India after a tie up
with the BK Modi Group and Modi Xerox Limited was incorporated in 1983.

The
Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), which had looked into the Bofors deal
before CBI started its investigations of bribery charges, had similarly not
given a clean chit to the Rajiv Gandhi government. The government survived the
day but since then, the Congress party has never won a majority in the Indian
Parliament. Bofors has also entered India's political lexicon as a synonym for
bribery.

DCA
officials are tight-lipped about the direction in which their Xerox
investigation is meandering. These are just four names that have tumbled out of
the closet. Reports suggest that it is a web of 85 companies through which
payments have been made. The challenge before DCA is to verify whether payments
were made to individuals in the government or did some officials of Modi Xerox
(as the company was then called) pocket the money.

While
it is still to be established where the money actually went, DCA officials
admit in private that siphoning money out of the company is a routine affair.
Just like every official worth his salt in the CBI knows that big arms deals do
have an element of an underhand deal.

Since
payoffs are now a part of business, this is where the interest of the average
person comes in. Hapless investors have seen scores of cases where the
companies get sick and promoters healthier by the day.

For
all the arms deal that have happened in India, whose defence spending is over
US$ 14 billion every year, only one case has been brought to light. None have
been prosecuted. Of nearly 7,000 publicly listed companies in India, a little
over 2,000 actively trade on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The rest are companies
which have turned sick, while some of their promoters get healthier.

Don’t misuse
House privileges to muzzle press

By Manish
Tewari

A press that cannot criticise those is
power is no press.

The
recent decision of the Karnataka Assembly in sentencing journalists Ravi
Belagere and Anil Raju to imprisonment for one year for contempt of the House
and a member, and therefore breach of privilege of the House, is unfortunate,
to say the least.

The
framers of the Constitution knew that free speech is the friend of change and
revolution. But they also knew that it is always the deadliest enemy of
tyranny. Freedom of speech means that you shall not do something to people
either for the views they have, or the views they express, or the words they
speak or write. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose
deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free
press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the
people. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors…” These words of
United States Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black are more relevant today in
India’s context than perhaps the day they were penned for preserving and
upholding the freedom of the press guaranteed under the First Amendment to the
United States Constitution.

The
press may be the fourth pillar of democracy. But a press that is not free is no
press. A press that cannot criticise those is power is no press. A press that
is intimidated by political power or sucks up to it is no press. For even our
constitutional scheme recognises the freedom of speech and expression, and
therefore by implication the freedom of press. However, more often than not,
political parties in India irrespective of their ideology seek to proscribe the
free press, for their collective DNA is thin-skinned to censure. Even though to
do so is constitutionally amoral.

The
recent decision of the Karnataka Assembly in sentencing journalists Ravi
Belagere and Anil Raju to imprisonment for one year for contempt of the House
and a member, and therefore breach of privilege of the House, is unfortunate,
to say the least.

It
is not that legislative bodies in the past have not acted in this manner
earlier too and their decisions have been held to be constitutional
abridgements. Déjà vu. In 1964, the UP Assembly found one Keshav Singh of being
guilty of contempt of the House and the members of the House, and sentenced him
to a week in prison. Keshav Singh’s crime was similar to the one that Mr
Belagere and Mr Raju are charged of — writing stuff that was considered by the
UP Assembly to be defamatory to one of its members.

When
Keshav Singh applied for and obtained bail from the Allahabad high court, the
Assembly went one step further and sought to imprison the advocate who filed
the bail petition and the two judges who granted bail. The entire
Allahabad high court consisting of 28 judges unanimously, and in a mark of
solidarity, stayed the operation of the sentence passed by the UP Assembly. The
unprecedented situation was surmounted only when the President made a reference
to the Supreme Court. In the presidential reference, the Supreme Court
observed: “In conclusion, we ought to add that throughout our discussion we
have consistently attempted to make it clear that the main point which we are
discussing is the right of the House to claim that a general warrant issued by
it in respect of its contempt alleged to have been committed by a citizen who
is not a member of the House outside the four walls of the House, is
conclusive, for it is on that claim that the House has chosen to take the view
that the judges, the advocate and the party have committed contempt by
reference to the conduct in the habeas corpus petition pending before the
Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court. Since we have held that in the
present case no contempt was committed either by the judges, or the advocate,
or the party respectively”.

The
court therefore was clear that criticism, even if unwarranted, does not
constitute either contempt of the House or its members, thus allowing them to
invoke the yet uncodified privileges under Articles 105 (3) for Parliament and
Article 194 (3) for the state legislatures. The privileges need to be spelt out
in black and white. Over the years, the Supreme Court has repeatedly laid down
the law circumscribing the powers and privileges of the legislatures.

The
freedom of the press is the heart of social and political intercourse while
privileges of the legislative institutions are one of the undefined silences in
the text of the Constitution, and have been exculpated and transported into the
Indian Constitution straight from the traditions of the House of Commons.

The
object of parliamentary privileges is to ensure that the smooth functioning of
legislative institutions is not hampered. The power to sentence to imprisonment
for the contempt of the House or its members is undoubtedly a privilege of the
House, a power that has been exercised by the House of Commons in the past, but
when the Supreme Court of India has categorically held that actions outside the
House, which have no direct effect of impinging on the functioning of the
legislative chamber, cannot be a trigger for invoking constitutional
privileges, is it then justified for the House to punish journalists whose
opinions may be unpalatable or in the worst case even slanted or downright
defamatory? The answer is no.

The
Karnataka Assembly has overshot its constitutional mandate under Article 194 in
sentencing Mr Belagere and Mr Raju for publishing some articles. An article
being disrespectful to a member or the House cannot be cause for the invoking the
power of privilege, specially when it is in exercise of the basic human right
of free speech. This is more so when such an action for such alleged defamation
would find remedy in both civil and criminal law, in the nature of a defamation
suit or a criminal complaint, coupled with a prayer for injuncting such person
from publishing such defamatory material in future. It is in this context the
exercise of the constitutional power of parliamentary/ legislative privilege,
and to find guilty a journalist of contempt of the House would tantamount to
giving a special status to a member of such a legislative body and providing
him or her a remedy apart from what is prescribed by law. The privilege to
punish for the contempt of the House is a power that must be scarcely called
into use in the most extreme of situations when the majesty or the functioning
of the House is under stress or severe strain. Allegedly defamatory writing
hardly falls into that category.

The
judicious use of a constitutional privilege becomes all the more relevant when
a wave of tyranny has been unleashed by the BJP government against independent
sections of the media.

Orchestrated
repression by the State — if you are not with us, then you are against us —has
divided the Indian media into the “kept” and the “unkept” media.

On
the one hand, broadcasting entities that are functioning in a manner that make
even North Korean TV channels blush with shame are patronised by the
government, and those who speak truth to power are being hounded and persecuted.

In
such a situation, any action by any constitutional body that reinforces this
spectre of fear, repression and intimidation is avoidable, even though that may
not have been the intent at all in this particular case and the journalist duo
just managed to get under the skin of some members of the House.

The
Karnataka Assembly would therefore be well-advised to suo motu withdraw its
resolution.

Friday, November 24, 2017

JAIL Doctors ?

Dalit’s
Diary -
eNews Weekly

Working For The Rights & Survival Of TheOppressed

Editor:
NAGARAJA.M.R…VOL.11 issue.46…… . 29 / 11 / 2017

Editorial : Doctors are NOT
Divine gods

People , society
treated doctors as gods. Nowadays by their own unfair practices doctors
themselves have proved otherwise. Their governing bodies have failed to
punish their deviant colleagues. Doctors are frequently
violating their oath. It is high time to bell the cat.

Gone are the days when doctors used to treat
poor patients free of cost / subsidized rate ,
missionary doctors giving free
treatment to poor. There are many allegations
against doctors / hospitals about
cheating / improper service. When doctors / hospital managements are
running the MEDICAL PROFESSION as a business , they should be
brought under law just like other businesses. Hospitals &
doctors are accountable to their
customers / patients for the services given. They must give proper billing
with breakups not consolidated one. They must maintain proper profit & loss account and
must pay taxes to the government. For the violations of the above , doctors
& hospitals must be legally prosecuted. When doctors & hospitals endangers the life of a customer / patient
, they must be charged for homicide.

Few doctors & hospitals ,
who are actually doing noble service to
poor & needy shouldd be given tax
exemptions, government subsidies. Even such doctors / hospitals are accountable
to patients & government. Nobody is
above law. If a doctor & hospital
is complying with law , why they are afraid of it. Karnataka state doctors
& hospitals must explain to public.

IMA Pledge

Every member should get
it frames in his or her office
It should never by violated in its letter and spirit.I solemnly pledge myself to consecrate my life to service of humanity.

Even
under threat, I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of
Humanity.

I
will maintain the utmost respect for human life from the time of
conception.

I
will not permit considerations of religion, nationality, race, party
politics or social standing to intervene between my duty and my patient.

I
will practice my profession with conscience and dignity.

The
health of my patient will be my first consideration.

I
will respect the secrets which are confined in me.

I
will give to my teachers the respect and gratitude which is their due.

I
will maintain by all means in my power, the honour and noble traditions of
medical profession.

I
will treat my colleagues with all respect and dignity.

I
shall abide by the code of medical ethics as enunciated in the Indian
Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations
2002.

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32
& ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:

Medical field is basically meant not
as a PROFESSION to earn profit but as a
SERVICE to humanity. Except for honest few doctors ,
honest few medical hospitals , Many doctors , Hospitals in india
are running the medical profession like greedy businessmen to make
quick bucks. They are grossly violating oath of DOCTOR.
Many doctors have utilized subsidized education by government
by way of preferential medical seat on the basis of caste , religion ,
etc , by way of scholarships , education loans , etc. Many hospitals have
utilized government subsidy while setting up hospitals.If at all doctors
are not inclined to serve humanity but only interested to
earn money , they should go to other professions.

2. Question(s) of Law:

Are patient’s lives not valuable ? Are not
doctors accountable ? Are not hospitals accountabble to patients ,
government & tax authorities ? Legal enforcement of CODE
OF CONDUCT to doctors. Accountability of Hospital
Management.

3. Grounds:

Requests for protection of patient’s right to life , criminal
prosecution of guilty doctors & hospital management.

4. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of
India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue
instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform
their duties & to answer the questions.
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this
as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned
public servants in the following cases to perform their duties b. to legally
enforce model code of conduct for doctors

c. to ask hospital management to make public
their rate chart for different treatment , different inserts , equipments
used.

d. to ask the doctor to provide complete details of
treatment given , inserts used , equipments used along with the
cost breakup to each patient at the time of discharge.

e. to bring hospitals under tax net.

f. to control black money thriving in medical profession.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this
as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned
public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to legally
enforce model code of conduct for doctors and to ask hospital
management to make public their rate chart for different treatment , different
inserts , equipments used. To ask the doctor to provide complete details of
treatment given , inserts used , equipments used along with the
cost breakup to each patient at the time of discharge. To bring hospitals
under tax net.

b. To control black money thriving in medical profession.

c. to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on
the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 16.11.2017 ………………..FILED
BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India…………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

OATH FORGOTTEN by Doctors

I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability
and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of
those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is
mine with those who are to follow.

I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all
measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment
and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine
as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh
the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug.

I will not be ashamed to say "I know
not," nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another
are needed for a patient's recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for
their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially
must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save
a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this
awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my
own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.

I will remember that I do not treat a fever
chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the
person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these
related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.

I will prevent disease whenever I can, for
prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of
society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of
mind and body as well as the infirm.

If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life
and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I
always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long
experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.