>>2153177Dunno what sentence 2 and 3 if your three-sentence post has to do with anything. I don't even see what your first sentence has to do wih anything. I was just saying he could use his words to articulate himself any time. Criticism is ok to me, but angrily calling something you don't like "gay" as the extent of your "criticism" doesn't even give context to what you're "criticizing".

>>2153218He's criticizing the sexual orientation of that guy. /e/ is not the best board for gays so the statement also implies redirection to better suited places. Such redirection could be applied to you too, good sir.

>>2153268An emotionally-charged word you only offer to those you're angry at, as the extent of your "criticism" against them is not the proposal of a valid argument. Unless you believe otherwise, in which case you're free to prove it such.

>>2153827You're just mad. I don't remember all of those images, but at least two images that showed male and female didn't even show genitalia and one of those two didn't even necessarily imply sexual physical contact. Moderate your anus

>>2153218>>2153339Stop shitting up the thread. A picture so warped and disgusting was posted that it can only come from an individual absolutely disjointed from female bodies. The conclusion being that the idiot would either be gay and just hasn't accepted it yet, or is just into shit that belongs on /d/ rather than /e/.

>>2154430>"Stop shitting up the thread.">proceeds to grasp at straws trying to justify dumbass "criticism" where all that was offered was the singular word "gay"

You straight ignored the subject matter of both posts you quoted. Why did you even reply if your only "defense" was ignoring the offense? As well by even giving context to the criticism above in defense of it, you forfeit its being an intellectually sound proposal which proves itself correct.

The singular word "gay" is dumb emotionally-charged criticism only proposed out of blind anger. You agree with that, hence your trying to make it more substantial. You've already lost by trying to defend it. You're just angry you can't articulate why you find the criticized subject matter morally wrong.