<quoted text>You have a Julian Assagne rewrite what has already been written type problem, don't you.Give it up. You quoted the disorder incorrectly while insulting another, and got called out on it.Grow the flock up, face reality and just admit YOU were wrong about it.

I didn't get that definition from internet encyclopedia but from a dictionary. Wherever you got yours and thought it was mroe accurate is not my problem. You seem to miss my point.

Look she is the who kept telling people are insane as if she knows what real insanity is and mean it literally. So I did the same to her and called her such even if it wasn't true. I knew what histrionic personality disorder is but I didn't specifically label her that but instead chose the other the more colloquial term that fits her behavior, "hysterical"

do you think you're being rational here? You really think I could diagnose people? If I did I would call you a pathological liar.

<quoted text>Um, you think they were joking?Inkblots are seen time after time. As a matter of fact what you "see" in the inkblot is extremely telling in what type of personality, person, and belief system you have. It has proven accurate enough that even psychologists use it, not just the quack psychiatrists. What you report "seeing" in the inkblot is your subconscious, anthropomorphic, images based on what you imagine or even see in the real word, and enhanced by what your mind focuses on. When you focus on Rah a lot, you will see Rah in everything, when you focus on unicorns a lot, you will see unicorns in everything, when you focus on any mythology a lot, that will always be what you "see" in any random configuration of colors, even in agates. It's such a well understood phenomenon that there is a huge database of references for the responses to cross reference now and formulate an almost perfect profile of a person, with nothing more than random colors.So no, your agates are no different than inkblots, you see what you want to see, or what you expect to see, even if it's not there. Post photos of them, without saying what they are, let us look. You won't because you know we'll not see what you see, if we see anything. Not seeing any imagery in the randomness is specific personality type, actually, one that we refer to as "skeptical."

I could post a picture but it will take some time and another trip to wal mart to make a picture disk. You evos sure are a lot of trouble...

<quoted text>SOME humans have the ability of SELF control... as well as the ability to listen to a little thing called a conscience-in knowing right vs wrong (including in the areas of "Do Unto other others, as one would wish to be treated themselves" per say) BETTER than others.FACT.For the ones that DON'T and only wish to USE some lame "we're all animlas" EXCUSE to try and justify thier own NOT as good "behavior"-oh well..that's their problem, NOT anyone elses!!!!!!!!!!

So you don't agree that we are all animals? Where did conscience come from? It's the reason why we study ethics. Are you a bible literalist? Is that why you take every thing people say here literally? Can you tell if people are kidding? Do you know what sacrcasm is?

READ BETWEEN THE LINES! Did it go over your head? I meant that figuratively speaking.

<quoted text>I could post a picture but it will take some time and another trip to wal mart to make a picture disk. You evos sure are a lot of trouble...

Um .... "make a picture disc?" It's called USB, you connect to your computer then download the images. Not that hard, we made it so even the most computer illiterate person could do it.

However I suspect I was correct in my assessment that you know we will not see what you see, so you are just dragging it out as an excuse to "forget" later on. I have a note-it on my desktop now, reminding me to ask again in a few days.

<quoted text>Perhaps we are to some degree, but humans don't have the senses of animals, even if they seek to emulate them. Deer are a particularly bad example of a metaphor of the human psyche, although if I were to speculate, I'd say the primary reason is because the human persona is based on binocular vision, while deer are animals who watch on all sides and flee from conflicts. Even though humans are not predators by their evolutionary nature, they share more in common with them, psychologically.Being bipedal is another break away from most animals at a fundamental level. I'd have to say, even if one was hard-wired similar to an animal, the differences in anatomy would be significant enough to produce very different personalities.

All animals are metaphors for ALL aspects of our psyche. We are not just one type of animal.

Can you tell us how bipedalism actually occured? How do you know we didn't get that from kangaroos?

<quoted text>Um .... "make a picture disc?" It's called USB, you connect to your computer then download the images. Not that hard, we made it so even the most computer illiterate person could do it.However I suspect I was correct in my assessment that you know we will not see what you see, so you are just dragging it out as an excuse to "forget" later on. I have a note-it on my desktop now, reminding me to ask again in a few days.

As I said, I have a collection and I have donated a few of them to museums. If I go through the trouble of posting one that I think has a picture in it, how many people would it take to convince you it has a picture, and how could we determine they are honest?

The connecticut school shooter was an Atheist ... nuff said! The world would be a happier place without Islam and Atheism."Anders Behring Breivik was a practicing militant Darwinian Atheist racist. He believed secularism and science was the world's salvation, not Jesus Christ."Anders Behring Breivik, Mass Murderer of Norway, was an Atheist Social Darwinist - NOT a Christianhttp://cross.tv/69392.

Both Atheists and Christians (and also Islam) are guilty of committing atrocities.

For the same reason that they adopted the false religions of the Greek and Roman gods.<quoted text>Wrong. From your favorite source, Wikipedia:"Rejection of the state religion was tantamount to treason. This was the context for Rome's conflict with Christianity, which Romans variously regarded as a form of atheism and novel superstitio."

So you're saying that TRUE Christians *would* kill another on the grounds of their beliefs. Yes, we would agree that they would do that.<quoted text>I didn't twist anything. You wrote "no TRUE Christians would not kill another on the grounds of their beliefs".If "*no* TRUE Christians would *not*", that's the same as "TRUE Christians *would*".

I really can't see your logic here...would not kill = would kill?

Not that it matters, but I sure you understood the message imply...lol

<quoted text>All animals are metaphors for ALL aspects of our psyche. We are not just one type of animal.Can you tell us how bipedalism actually occured? How do you know we didn't get that from kangaroos?

This goes back to basic evolution. Accept it or don't. Human bipedalism began in the days of ardipithicus, and refined itself through the last 4 million years.

I only suggest the animal reference because I think that animal algorithms do exist as overlays to a core human psyche. I've already posted on the subject. I don't think you'll find such things among the traditional Caucasian populations because they are psychological extroverts who aren't very stable when contending with mixed feelings. It would take some time to explain.

I simply don't consider "spirits" to exist, and the psyche just is not separate from anatomy. People don't like things to be reduced to algorithms and a set of experiences, but that is the nature of things anyway.

<quoted text>As I said, I have a collection and I have donated a few of them to museums. If I go through the trouble of posting one that I think has a picture in it, how many people would it take to convince you it has a picture, and how could we determine they are honest?

No amount of anthropomorphizing will ever convince me there is something supernatural at work, because we understand the phenomenon too well to consider it evidence. However that wasn't my point in wanting you to post the images, so go ahead, post the images.

But since you have compounded your assertion with another lie, I am doubting you even have one now. Which is disappointing, very disappointing. I was hoping you'd be honest about something, but when you keep adding more and more excuses of why you do not post the images it sounds more like a lie. My digital camera cost me $30, my video camera cost me $25 (and it shows), my webcam cost $10, if you cannot afford a digital media device of that sort, you aren't looking for one. So the camera assertion was either a lie, or a stall tactic.

Now you are claiming they're "in museums" and such, this is not only probably another stall tactic, it's very difficult to believe. Now I suspect that when you do finally post the images you'll make an excuse like "the photos turned out too blurry" when we don't see what you want us to.

<quoted text>As I said, I have a collection and I have donated a few of them to museums. If I go through the trouble of posting one that I think has a picture in it, how many people would it take to convince you it has a picture, and how could we determine they are honest?

None of them have a "picture" in them. They have images made by the water that our brain identifies as a Jesus.

I tell you what. You post your rocks and I will post my dog butts and we will let people decide which one looks more like Jesus.

<quoted text>Nor the victims of Science experiments, that make the Inquisitions look like a Sunday picnic.

I'm fairly sure that most science includes a strong set of ethics. It's true that science isn't some moral code to follow like chivalry, and scientists like ones working for the NAZIs engaged in atrocities. That's why you don't separate the NAZI scientists from the "true" scientists. They all must be held accountable, as should all Christians.

Now, if you're suggesting something but not saying it, that's a moral problem for YOU! Keep your silence and I WILL assume that you're just engaging in the same old "one hand washing the other" that is the trademark of Caucasian Christians.

<quoted text>None of them have a "picture" in them. They have images made by the water that our brain identifies as a Jesus.I tell you what. You post your rocks and I will post my dog butts and we will let people decide which one looks more like Jesus.

Let's forgo the dog pictures. I have enough problems with cats in the house who don't consider perspective when they jump up on my stomach while I'm lying down.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.