This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Re: Glenn Beck softening on gay rights

Originally Posted by Einzige

I don't logically. Do you logically? That sounds dirty.

Sorry, it's corrected!

Originally Posted by AdamT on Nov 8th, 2012

Over the next four years the economy will continue to rebound and we will gradually get deficits under control. The real esate market will rebound, unemployment will fall to 6.5% or below, and GDP growth will stand at 3.5 - 4%. We won't be in any wars. And conservatives will still be whining.

Re: Glenn Beck softening on gay rights

Originally Posted by Amigo

Sorry, it's corrected!

At any rate, logical thinking leads one to naturally assume that there are, in fact, gay people, because there are an awful lot of people who call themselves 'gay'. I assume you wouldn't appreciate my declaring that there are no such things as 'Christians', even if one could make a stronger case for there being no Christians than there being no gay people ("In truth, there was but one Christian, and he died on the cross").

I dip my forefinger in the watery blood of your impotent mad-redeemer (your Divine Democrat  your Hebrew Madman) and write over his thorn-torn brow, The true prince of Evil  the king of the Slaves!
- Ragnar Redbeard, Might Is Right, 1890

Re: Glenn Beck softening on gay rights

Originally Posted by lizzie

Being that Beck has been gravitating toward libertarianism for a few years now, I'm not sure why you would find it astonishing.

If he has, he's been doing it very slow and all wrong. He mostly has been pandering to the religious right. His show was nothing more than him posting pictures of hitler next to obama on his blackboard and saying "See what I mean!" He uses sensationalism and the waving of his hands to get conservatives angry.

I wouldn't call his stances libertarian at all. This was certainly a huge transformation of his views.

Originally Posted by LowDown

I've got to say that it is shadenfreudalicious to see the rich and famous fucquewads on the coast suffering from the fires.