Reader Comments and Retorts

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Oliver is just about the only one on the above list that is solid against righties, and that is consistent.

I wrote this last night before bed, so I think I had a poor choice of words here. All of the guys above are generally solid against righties, but Oliver is actually excellent against them and most of the others are not.

I followed the Rangers a lot more closely when Oliver first came up and wonder how his career would look, and how many saves he would have compiled, had Johnny Oates not moved him into the rotation in 1995. He was an injury-prone starting pitching prospect in the minors who pitched a total of 55 innings during his age 19-21 seasons. Great stuff but needed to harness his control (159 H, 235 K, 122 BB in 232 minor league innings over 5 seasons from 1988-1992). He just couldn't stay healthy. Pretty much the story of every Rangers pitching prospect during this era.

His move to the bullpen in 1993 at AA kept him healthy all season and put him on the fast track to the majors. 6.3 H/9 and 9.4 K/9 despite 5.0 BB/9.... good for a 1.96 ERA over 73 innings.

1994 was a good healthy major league rookie year in line with his minor league numbers.

Then in 1995 Johnny Oates decided to move him into the rotation after the season started. He made his first start as part of the regular rotation on May 30. By the end of June his season was over due to injuries.

On one hand I'm amazed that he managed to remain relatively healthy as a rotation starter over the next 8 years but wonder if he would have grown into being a lights-out reliever with dynamic stuff instead of spending the bulk of his career as a Grade C/C- starter.

I wonder what ZiPS would say Oliver's 1995-2005 seasons would look like had he remained a reliever.

Rhodes has certainly been very good, although he's just not logged the innings the other guys have. He could be on the list, but he definitely hasn't been better than Oliver over the last 5 years - just because of the massive IP gulf (and 2005 was a very good Rhodes year, while 2006 was not).

3 of the 8 pitchers listed above (including Oliver) were 2006 Mets. The Mets didn't really pursue Oliver after the season, assuming it was a fluke year. Seemed reasonable at the time, but didn't work out.