A new study conducted by a Finnish research team has found little evidence to support the idea of man-made climate change. The results of the study were soon corroborated by researchers in Japan.

In a paper published late last month, entitled 'No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic climate change', a team of scientists at Turku University in Finland determined that current climate models fail to take into account the effects of cloud coverage on global temperatures, causing them to overestimate the impact of human-generated greenhouse gasses.

Models used by official bodies such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature," the study said, adding that "a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing" in the models.

Adjusting for the cloud coverage factor and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions, the researchers found that mankind is simply not having much of an effect on the Earth's temperature.

If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice.

The study's authors make a hard distinction between the type of model favored by climate scientists at the IPCC and genuine evidence, stating "We do not consider computational results as experimental evidence," noting that the models often yield contradictory conclusions.

Given the evidence presented in the study, the Finnish team rounded out the paper by concluding "we have practically no anthropogenic climate change," adding that "the low clouds control mainly the global temperature."

The results sharply cut against claims put forward by many environmentalists, including US lawmakers such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who argue not only that climate change is an immediate threat to the planet, but that it is largely a man-made phenomenon. Ocasio-Cortez, better known as 'AOC', has proposed a 'Green New Deal' to address the supposedly dire threat.

Japanese researchers at the University of Kobe arrived at similar results as the Turku team, finding in a paper published in early July that cloud coverage may create an "umbrella effect" that could alter temperatures in ways not captured by current modeling.

Comment: Policymakers will forge ahead with this massive lie despite numerous and credible evidence that man-made global warming is bunk.

It is difficult for me to imagine how humans aren't affecting our climate having pumped petroleum and human excrement into the seas, belched smog into the atmosphere, cut down plants and excited other life forms to make way for roads, townships and cities, and buried rotting rubbish.

If you cut down the vegetation in a space, flatten and seal the ground you lose the diversity of species within that uniform environment. You lose most of the natural, living ecosystem. This much is made obvious merely by looking at a typical car park.
.
If you assume a steady growth rate of the human population, eventually the Earth would become little more than a barren space; like a car park where not even humans could survive.
.
All of creation is full of reason and purpose, in my opinion. Each creature that exists derives a food source from other species, each creature appears to be in a symbiotic relationship with others and each creature stimulates the environment with its movements. No two creatures can exist in the exact same space.
Humans alone can't perform all the functions necessary to maintain our ecosystem but the totality of life can. It is obvious that our actions have a huge impact on our natural world.

The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities, that makes it seem inconceivable that other ways are viable, that removes the sense that there is an outside.