bobbytan wrote:
You must be very new to the OM-D posts/threads. I started this thread on July 1, 2012 and I have posted a lot of OM-D images since then.
Sorry that I was mislead by phrasing used in your post and that I didn't read all of 100+ pages of this thread before that.

Just to repeat: only a very poor reading would have led to the conclusion that he had no E-M5. He absolutely did not say so. There is also no need to read all 100 pages, merely to notice that Bobby was the OP.

carstenw wrote:
Just to repeat: only a very poor reading would have led to the conclusion that he had no E-M5. He absolutely did not say so. There is also no need to read all 100 pages, merely to notice that Bobby was the OP.
We will have to agree to disagree, won't we?

Now that we know you have much better reading skills (or much more time on your hands) than me can I please point out topic of discussion was how malable EM5's RAW files are? Could you please contribute what is your experience with that?

Now that we know you have much better reading skills (or much more time on your hands) than me can I please point out topic of discussion was how malable EM5's RAW files are? Could you please contribute what is your experience with that?

If you have OM-D photos to post, kindly do so. Otherwise, how about you take your topic and start a new thread?

Savas K wrote:
If you have OM-D photos to post, kindly do so. Otherwise, how about you take your topic and start a new thread?
Please notice I was merely responding to somebody else's comment about OMD's files and then tell both of us again discussing of OMD's files is _not_ a topic of this thread, if you can. But before you do please go through all 125+ pages of this thread and find every single post that you feel might not be on topic (I didn't go through them but I am sure you could find at least one more beside this one) and ask them first same what you asked me. Once you are done with that do same policing for every thread on this board. Only when you are finished with that _and_ they all follow your request you will have the right to say same to me. Thank you!

Just like me. Congrats! You should look at the 35-100 lens too ... and then maybe also add the 7-14 so you are covered from 7 to 100 or 14-200mm in 35mm/FF terms.

I do have to admit that the Fuji X-E1 and Sony NEX 7n + Megabones Speed Booster are both looking rather attractive ... but the Fuji has a lot of issues and the Sony NEX lenses are quite big and heavy, and neither offers IBIS, so at least for now the OM-D is still tipping the scales - but only just. I sure hope the "pro" version of the OM-D happens soon as we want and need a better sensor and IQ, etc. to keep up with the Sony and Fuji offerings.

jviegas wrote:
I've recently jumped to the OM-D wagon from the 5D MkII, and I'm happy cause I am again taking the cam out to make photos, and of course I really like the IQ too.