Privacy is not a human right. You can live just fine without an ounce of privacy. That's not the issue.

Privacy is a civil liberty, because of the possibility of social consequences and commercial disruption.

Everyone's metadata is collected for good reason, to be stored in a national database where agents can access it and search for evidence when needed. It doesn't mean they are looking at everyone's records. It's also not private. Phone companies have access to this information without problems.

The NSA has sought court orders especially for the metadata.

Yes some foreign surveillance does not require warrants because it's foreign surveillance, not protected by any laws.

They are not collecting everyone's emails and "phone calls" now you're just making shit up again.

No it isn't. A human right is a necessary step for survival or health. You can survive under a security camera. You (and many others) even survive living with someone without privacy such as roommates. It's not a human right. Nothing happens to you when your privacy is violated. It's like being offended. Unless you want to say "Being unoffended is a human right." Because that would be an equivalent argument.

Human rights are "inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being."

Human rights are, in other words, rights that everyone is entitled to, no matter what they have done, who they are or where they are from.

The UDHR includes the right to privacy.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.