‘Mineral rights’ is a term used to describe the unique set of privileges awarded to individuals owning property. These privileges award property owners full control to any minerals that is found within their real estate, allowing them to extract, sell, and bequeathed both organic and non-organic materials for any given purpose. Minerals such as oil, coal, gas, and gemstones fall under these clauses in laws governing property ownership.

Those holding mineral rights to their property can be faced with several dilemmas and important decision. Among the many considerations that should be analyzed by these property owners is the question of whether or not it is beneficial to sell their rights to another party. As an alternative to selling, property owners can also consider leasing out their property. The first choice allows a property owner to receive an immediate sum as payout. Meanwhile, the second scenario gives the property owner the opportunity to receive royalty payments from the materials mined by whoever holds the lease. This decision can easily be overwhelming because both can prove to be beneficial in the long run. However, most experts advocate that selling mineral rights is a much better choice.

Simply leasing mineral rights leaves property owner vulnerable to the possible decline of the value being mined on their land. When this happens, the amount of royalty payments they will receive in the future can continue to decrease. Selling mineral rights offer much more security, offering property owners a huge payout at the time when the material on their land is at its most valuable. Property owners can also be assured that they won’t have to face significant increases in tax that is typically associated with royalty earnings.

This immediate payout can prove valuable should there be an emergency that requires immediate financial attention. An accident or a sudden death in the family can do a lot to strain one’s stability and having a lump sum can definitely come in handy.

Hydrating with the right enough of fluids is extremely important to one’s health. As a result, it’s easy to see why water-borne diseases can be very alarming. Among such conditions caused by contaminated water sources is amebiasis, caused by the one-celled parasite ‘Entamoeba histolytica’. This parasite can enter the body typically through the ingestion of contaminated food and water, although it can also be passed on by swallowing food and water that have picked up the parasite’s cysts or eggs. Amebiasis is particularly alarming because it is highly contagious. Anyone carrying the parasite in his or her system can easily pass it on through their stool. When this fecal material contaminates food or water sources, the disease can very quickly spread to others. While the parasite can lie dormant and not cause any noticeable symptoms for some time, it can invade the lining of a person’s large intestine and cause stomach pain and cramping, nausea, bloody diarrhea, and fever. In rare cases and without proper treatment, the parasite can soon invade the liver and form an abscess. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or CDC, amebiasis is most common in people that reside in tropical areas with poor sanitary conditions.

However, they are also quick to note that amebiasis can also be contracted in the United States, especially for people who have recently travelled to or have emigrated from these tropical areas. Unreliable water and sanitation systems can also be a big factor in the spread of amebiasis. This can be true for establishments and institutions, as well as the home. Fortunately, while the condition is quite common, it is also as easy to prevent. For one, children might be more susceptible to contracting amebiasis due to exploratory play. Encouraging them to wash their hands frequently, particularly before a meal, should protect them from the disease.

A foolproof way to keep water sources at home completely safe, is through the use of water softening and filtering systems in residential homes. For individuals traveling to countries with poor sanitary conditions, the CDC suggests drinking from sealed bottles or cans.

A lot of employees in America work jobs where they will have to sit at a desk and use a computer for a significant amount of time. While these types of occupations don’t require as much physical exertion as manual labor jobs do, research provides strong evidence that employees in desk job are equally at risk of developing back pain. As noted by Cornell University and the Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, about four out of five cases of back pain is reported by individuals who spend an inordinate amount of time sitting down and hunch over a keyboard at work.

The most common culprit for work-related back pain is bad posture. Employees working desk jobs can easily hurt their backs by slouching and hunching over in their desks. The best way from feeling any strain or pain throughout the day is by keeping a good posture where the back is kept straight and where the head and neck aligned with relaxed shoulders. Another factor that comes into play is the position of the computer screen. Sitting too close to the computer monitor can force one to slouch and bend over. To prevent work-related back pain, the chair should ideally be positioned to ensure that an employee is optimally seated an arm’s length from the screen. Re-arranging the keyboard and mouse to suit this arrangement is also a necessary step to avoid getting too strained.

Perhaps the most important tip that can help employees prevent work-related back pain is to take periodic breaks by standing up from the desk and stretching. Following a short exercise routine can do a lot to relieve any muscle strain and tension that is typical from spending too much time sitting down.

Don’t be mistaken that solving work-related back pain is the sole responsibility of employers. In the same way, employers can ensure the health and well-being of their workforce by providing ergonomic and comfortable seats. The website of the pre-employment testing experts at WorkSTEPs offers another suggestion, noting that employers could use functional capacity testing during the pre-employment process, as well as for employees that are returning back to work after recovering from an injury. Such a test will ensure that employees will be able to meet or continue to meet the physical considerations of a specific position.