(26 March 2015 - 06:01 AM)
I dont know about all that. As bad as we get over sports the Brits get far worse. You might suffer a huge beat down if you say the wrong thing there. Well maybe not being its televised to the U.S.. Security probably be pretty tight.

(26 March 2015 - 07:04 AM)
Ive seen a lot of videos. Most countries go psycho over their soccer teams. Ive seen some serious very bloody beat downs. Fans stabbing the players and refs,etc. And they say we are bad in the U.S. not even close to that.

(27 March 2015 - 02:37 AM)
London is 4 hours ahead of east coast U.S. Bellator prelims are 7pm Friday night U.S. East Coast time and the main card is 9pm So just add 4 hours to that if you can catch either. Im sure you can catch a stream or use a U.S. VPN if you dont have access to Spike.com. You guys might get Bellator on another channel their just like with the UFC.

(27 March 2015 - 02:47 AM)
Anyway only reason I mentioned it was because of your sense of humor. The last Bellator 134 was called the British Invasion. If you watch mma Might want to add this site to your favorites http://www.mmauk.net...y/bellatornews/

(27 March 2015 - 02:55 AM)
There was one of those hour long shows about the upcoming event featuring the fighters the prior week to Bellator 134 and all 4 of the Brits were cocky as hell. Yelling "The British are coming!!!!"

Thoughts

can we really look at this as a disappointment? sure we can. the O was terrible and the D was solid. we held a super bowl contending team to 10 points. this was a game we def should have won if our O showed up to play. All we can do now is just get ready for Sunday. People dont freak we'll be fine. One game wont kill the season.

get used to this type of game. they are gonna be like this week in and week out. only we will be on the good end more times then not. We should have won this game 9-6 and i'll take that any day of the week!

WE got robbed. The only way the ravens could move the ball was thru B.S penalties. The offense didn't help with Greene fumbling twice and Keller who had brain freeze and forgot where the marker was. The offense needs to get it together next week. The refs did a horrible job last night

Well if we cant score a single td on offense I cant see this team coming out on top more often than not. If it goes this way each week all a team has to do is get a td and we lose

I'm pretty sure we will score a offensive TD at some point during the season. (although after last night's performance it doesn't look likely) My point being, most of our games will be low scoring. That will give us a shot at some point late in the game to either go head or hold our opponent when we have a lead.

The Defense will carry this team no doubt, but this is nothing new. Last year very few games were won by the offense and even more were LOST by the offense.

The O needs to stop with all the BS line of scrimmage tomfoolery. They ain't fooling anyone with the multiple formations, shifts and hard counts. Get to the line, snap the fu#*en' ball, control the line of scrimmage, believe in the run and use the pass as the dagger.
And when the D gives you a short field put points on the fu@#en' board!

The K steps on Edwards and he gets flagged? That's just as dumb as the Calvin Johnson no-catch rule. Score should've been 9-6.

Its the rule. He committed the penalty, so it should have been called. If it was the other way around you would say the same thing. Control your body and don't end up where the kicker is bringing down his foot if you don't get to the kick.

Its the rule. He committed the penalty, so it should have been called. If it was the other way around you would say the same thing. Control your body and don't end up where the kicker is bringing down his foot if you don't get to the kick.

It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.

Exterminate all rational thought, that is the conclusion I have come to

a ll the holding calls and the dpi calls were correct....kicker looked like he just fell over. Motion flag cost us 6

Mostly our fault... Cro and Wilson panicked due to being isolated ...if you're gonna blitz 7 you must stop the throw....Rex took the gambles...he failed...outcoached beacuse the Ravens handled the blitz and we didn't adjust.

Our team is schizophrenic...play like wild men on D - AT TIMES TOO RISKY LAST NIGHT. ...play like girls on O failing to even pass 15 yards down the middle

It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.

Agreed completely...not only that...but if you do actually block the kick you can bend the kicker's leg in half, not a problem.

It's not the intention of the rule to penalize a player laying on the ground to be called for it. The rule is to stop players from bumping the kicker while he is vulnerable. By strict interpretation of that rule there is literally nothing to stop the kicker from intentionally moving out of his way to get his leg bumped. As always with the kicker-protecting rules, too strict of an interpretation will cause teams to give up trying to block kicks. Really, any good block attempt will cause contact that could be ruled as a penalty.

Part of the running into the kicker rule is not occupying the area on the ground where the kicker is trying to land (if you don't block the kick). Edwards failed to do so. He took a risk and it backfired, can't put it on the refs.

Part of the running into the kicker rule is not occupying the area on the ground where the kicker is trying to land (if you don't block the kick). Edwards failed to do so. He took a risk and it backfired, can't put it on the refs.

That call was bullshit and you know it. If the teams were reversed, you'd be singing a different tune. How is a player who is air born suppose to pick a spot he lands at? Wouldn't that be going against gravity? Rules are designed for two reasons: to ensure fair play and to prevent injuries. If anyone, the K has a choice to either step on the player or not. That should've been an a flag on him for unnecessary roughness and the Ravens should have lost 15 yards.

That call was bullshit and you know it. If the teams were reversed, you'd be singing a different tune. How is a player who is air born suppose to pick a spot he lands at? Wouldn't that be going against gravity? Rules are designed for two reasons: to ensure fair play and to prevent injuries. If anyone, the K has a choice to either step on the player or not. That should've been an a flag on him for unnecessary roughness and the Ravens should have lost 15 yards.

Really? There are dozens of rules in many pro sports that penalize you for not being in control of your body, even while airborne.

This rule fit in one of your purposes. kickers and Punters are given a space to set their leg back down to avoid injury. If you don't block the kick, you can't be in that space.

What rules are you talking about? What rule in what sport demands that an airborn player defy the laws of physics?

*airborne

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.
If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.
If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.

Both of those situations are fouls based on the fact that the leaper is initiating contact with a player. Edwards landed on the ground and was stepped on. Quit trying to split hairs.

If a DB leaps in the air and lands on a WR before that WR touches the ball - Pass Interference.If a a basketball player drives and leaps towards the hoop on a drive for a dunk/lay up and he collides with a defender who had established position - Charging.

Shall I continue?

You choose to leave the ground. Once your up there you have to take the consequences.

It's only charging if your name is not LeBron James.

Oh well when Brandon "Ike Turner" Marshall does the same thing Edwards did you'll be singing a different tune.

FlyHiJets, on 01 June 2013 - 08:35 PM, said:

You're the scumbag that thinks everyone should kiss the as$es of a bunch of criminals but I'm a dumbass. Yeah okay douchebag. Go give some illegal wetback or Revis another blowjob. But then again.....don't you live in an entirely different country but yet think you can tell us how to live? Go fvck yourself little boy. You're likely still living with mommy & daddy. Pu$$y.

azjetfan, on 02 July 2014 - 03:36 PM, said:

There are a few things I have realized about Mr. Jet over a few topics.

1) He is a racist. By constantly using race as a battling tool.
2) He is an extreme Liberal. If you are on either extreme you are probabaly more wrong than right.
3) He is one of those people who will never admit fault, error or defeat.
4)His life sucks and he takes it out on people who don't share in his views.