Summary: With serious stability and performance issues on console, level design that tends more toward turkey shoot than firefight, and a story and characters that stumble in their attempts at relevance and pathos, Medal of Honor walks into a quagmire it never really escapes from. Read Full Article

I feel like these are problems they should have seen in their numerous hands on previews, yet there was never any mention of it. Yet another reason why I don't pre-order. Previews are essentially free advertising these days.

I haven't played it, but after hearing the remarks from a friend of mine that got it at midnight, I don't plan on it. He said that EA's servers were down every time he tried to play it online. Seems to be a common issue with EA titles...

Dude thats a load of **** i got the game at midnight and it was perfectly fine there was never any frame rate issues or any issues what so ever and i was playing multiplayer and its hella fun, **** you ign get off COD'S balls

Lol at what BisquickDestroyer said, mostly because it's so true. But I've come to learn that Arthur doesn't like anything... I've played this game (bought it at midnight), and it's better than Airborne, which got a 7.9.

This is really dissapointing. I had high expectations for this game, especially for the multiplayer. I pre-ordered this game. Damn....I should've waited fro Call of Duty; Blacks Ops even though I was not thinking of buying that game.

I am tired of COD too but the graphical glitches and poor level design in MoH are inexcusable. I guess not too many people will be in the Battlefield 3 beta unless you can get in by pre-ordering Battlefield 3.

Head over to Metacritic...no mention of performance bugs there. Did the reviewer at least try another copy of the game? Or try it on a different console? How much will the score change if the performance of the PS3 or PC version is considerably better?

I smell a rat. It's not the original MW or DICE's excellent BFBC2, but it was pretty good in the open beta. Not perfect, but not a 6.0 either. The broken mess that is FF XIV managed a 5.5. Geesh.

lmao.
graphical bugs?
red dead redemption had more graphical bugs then my grandmas ass. it froze on my every half hour.
mw2 had a 3 hour campaign, broken multiplay. it got a 9.5 or something.
while i dont agree MoH is a 10/10. based on the pc beta, e3, as well as ps3 beta i would give the game a 8/10. but a 6? suck that CoD cock ign

It doesn't surprise me that this game received such a low review score, look at the competition it has to face. Medal of Honor needs to rebuild from the ground up, most FPS gamers look for realistic gameplay and MOH is kind of cheesy. I think COD and MW have FPS on lock for now, look at the Tom Clancy games they have a great platform and they are in their own lane. MOH needs to figure out how to seperate itself.

"There's no real investment in the characters as people, and the gravitas the story fumbles toward never really comes together."

this is not fable, this is a detailed real life war sim, or a war game is you want to be a dick about it, non the less, in real life war, no one cares who you are or what you do, just as long as you do your job and get home safe, go play final fantisy if you want "investment's on characters" ill never credut one of your reviews ever again

i suspected a quality difference between on and offline but do find this review a little off, i played the beta and so on and didn't come across there issues but that was the beta. will have to sample the single player from a demo or a friends copy

I've already read several review for this game and they all seem to think that the issues slightly out weigh the positives. I never thought this game looked like anything great and based off the reviews I think I can wait until it $20 before I'll give it a try.

@XxYOSHI549xX

Try actually reading a review or take a look at all of the other average reviews this game has gotten.

Nice to see Geis not holding back but for those still being silly the review clearly states this game is playable and a little bit of ok, so please no more tears. I would 100% do things to your bumbum Gies.

I have to agree with some of the complaints in this review. After watching a playthrough of the first three levels of this game, there's really nothing here that makes this game stand out from other military shooters in the market. For a hugely anticipated franchise reboot based on an actual conflict, I found Medal of Honor to be very bland and uninteresting. This is truly a huge disappointment, in my opinion.

I prebooked this and I have yet to play anything other than the beta. I never played the other MoH's since I was knee deep in CoD.
But regardless, I will give this a try and hope that perhaps someone can offer a fight to the CoD monopoly.
If only so I can play a game where I don't get sprint-knifed by a 10 year old from 40 ft away.
So count me in to be one of the proud early adopters that took a chance on a rebooted franchise and hopefully, this won't be the end of the resurgence.

Hopefully other devs will learn not to make their game so similar to CoD. I hope they don't give black ops a high score if hardly anything changed from last year's version. I think the Killzone fanbase is going to greatly increase next year.