<quoted text> Foul!A man prospecting for oil is an act of what?I hope you know the answer, it is science, yes but faith is needed, because there may or may not be oil under the ground.

Not faith, because science is perfectly open to the possibility of there being no oil underground. It comes up with a scientific theory based on evidence.

Currently ALL geology is based on old world assumptions, because it has been found that young Earth assumptions do not work, period.

That's why there are no Young Earth Creationist geologists looking for oil deposits. And the geologists the creationists sent out in the eighties to go look for evidence of a global flood and young Earth all came back and told their bosses exactly what they didn't wanna hear.

After that the creo's stopped sending scientists out into the field and just concentrated on apologetics. Apologetics of course being a pseudonym for lying for Jesus.

So no, when geologists looking for oil deposits find those deposits more often with old Earth geology than they do with young Earth geology, it's NOT a matter of faith.

<quoted text>Exactly woody, humans have not started....kind of ironic. What will humans discover? Gods heavenly gates and every single human that has ever passed to the after life? So, woody how long did it take humans to evolve language, than writing, than the Bible? And, discover that bones are indeed the gateway to human existence.....silly stuff woody. Once humans explore deep space, clues will discount all theories and man made concepts

..........Onward Puddle GooistsOnward puddle goooists marching as to war !with the word of Darrwin going on before!Dawkins the royal master,leads against the foe!Forward into battle, see his book sales goooo!onward puddle gooists marching as to war,with the word of Darwin ,going on before!Now everyone bow their head in awesome reverence to the power of the goo, all life came from the goo, and no life that exists came not from the goo.Blessed be the goo and the randomness from which the goo sprang into life to evolve all human beings into a life of total freedom from morality, or immorality or any standard from which humans must adhere except the ones which are ordained by the shifting sands of time which aided the goo in our creation.Let us hail our trinity.Nothing ,which our universe sprang fromThe goo,and the purposelessness of life.'

Onward Dude ,onward, you are so close to being a 43rd degree gooist who unlocks the secret of the goo.

Following the footprints of positive selectionFebruary 15th, 2013 in Genetics

For decades, the human genome could only tell us what we already suspected about the evolution of certain traits. Researchers were able to trace the genetic origin stories of lactose tolerance (as opposed to lactose intolerance), malaria resistance, and more only after observing these successful traits in specific populations. Now, the study of positive selection  the ability to determine which genetic changes have conferred an evolutionary advantage  has reached a turning point: the genome itself can be used as a starting point to guide scientists to important genetic locations, leading to hypotheses about human health and disease.

In a paper published this week in Cell, researchers from the Broad Institute, Harvard University, Harvard Medical School, and elsewhere describe the tools and resources that have come together to make this shift possible. Pardis Sabeti, a senior associate member at the Broad and an associate professor at Harvard, and Shari Grossman, a graduate research assistant in the Sabeti and Lander labs, worked with colleagues to develop a tool known as the Composite of Multiple Signals (CMS) test to detect the genetic signals of positive selection, and trace these signals to specific sites in the genome. Thanks to the public release of sequence data from the 1000 Genomes Project, the research team has been able to put CMS into practice to generate a list of 412 candidate signals.

<quoted text>.....and then you immediately throw it at the spectators outside your cage, right?Charles, you've lost any form of moral high ground by letting your debate get reduced to trash talk. You've demonstrated your own lack of faith, and you've shown that your faith is driven by your social incompetence. You really need to step back and read your holy book again and find out what you're missing.

Wrong!The bible is a widely read book translated in many versions and languages, yes or no?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.