It is hard to judge teams drafting ability based on these numbers due to some teams were horrible over the last 5 years so they should have had more starters. They would have a higher pick and their picks would have had a better chance of starting based on team overall talent.

The team that sticks out is NE as they would have had near the 30th -32nd pick every year and still were 4/6 with a talented team to begin with.

Is that starters on the team that drafted them? Or possibly on another team?Also, is that based on 2012 or projected starters in 2013?

One thing does stand out no matter what the answers are: Oakland has 1 of 4 picks. That's bad. Then throw in that the picks they traded away probably aren't even on the team anymore.... Just horrible management.