Citing "serious and credible reports,
allegations and rumors" about the integrity of Tuesday results,
Congressman Dennis Kucinich is backing a full recount of ballots for
the Democratic contest in New Hampshire, meaning that both party's primaries
may now both be cast into doubt. However, vote fraud expert Bev Harris
has warned that it could all be a trap to validate Diebold electronic
voting machines.

As we reported yesterday, New Hampshire
Republican candidate Albert Howard is prepared to put his name behind
a primary recount in order to ascertain if the example of "human
error" in the town of Sutton, where Ron Paul was originally given
zero votes, was an isolated case or if wider vote fraud took place.

Kucinich's motivation for demanding a
recount is the highly suspicious way in which Hillary Clinton reversed
a 13 point pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama, aided by a 7%
swing thanks to the use of Diebold electronic voting machines.

(Article
continues below)

"Kucinich alluded to online reports alleging
disparities around the state between hand-counted ballots, which
tended to favor Sen. Barack Obama, and machine-counted ones that
tended to favor Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. He also noted the
difference between pre-election polls, which indicated Obama would
win, and Clinton's triumph by a 39 percent to 37 percent margin,"
reports
the Associated Press.

No doubt the Congressman is referring to
this website, the Brad Blog and others who led the charge in exposing
probable vote fraud in the hours after the primary.

Though Kucinich has cautioned that he
doesn't expect the recount to produce significantly different results,
vote
fraud expert Bev Harris warns that unless chain of custody issues
are addressed before a recount, the recount itself is worthless because
it will be overseen by the same people who committed vote fraud in the
first place if indeed there was any chicanery.

In addition, should the recount produce
exactly the same results it will validate Diebold electronic voting
machines despite the fact that they have been proven to be wide open
to fraud.

"A candidate asking for a recount
may well be a tool used to 'prove' everything was okay and then that
candidate will be further discredited," reports Harris.

"We need citizen control and oversight.
This is not going to come from the recount. If the election was rigged...don't
you think the riggers would have a backup Plan B for a rigged recount,
knowing how easy it is to get a recount in NH?," she concludes.

Please help
our fight against the New World Order by giving a donation. As bandwidth
costs increase, the only way we can stay online and expand is with your
support. Please consider giving a monthly or one-off donation for whatever
you can afford. You can pay securely by either credit card or Paypal.Click here
to donate.