On Wednesday, May 7, 2003, at 02:51 PM, <ragge@ludd.luth.se> wrote:
> As a result of this, I think there may be a reason to remove the
> kvm database alltogether, especially because it would need a bunch
> of extra massage anyway to update it if modules are loaded/unloaded;
> and fall back to the old "nlist" way of retreiving kernel symbols
> if /dev/ksyms is not in the kernel?
I think this is a great idea. It would allow us to remove a bunch of
code, as well.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>