22 November 2013

NHL man-games lost and CHIP analysis - 20-game report

This is my second look for the 2013/14 regular season
looking at which teams have been hit hardest by injuries by trying
to place a value on the games missed by players due to
injury/illness.

The
concept again - multiply each game missed by a player by his
2013/14 cap charge (including bonuses), then take the aggregate of
these figures for
each team and divide by 82. This indicator of value lost to a team
by injury/illness is called CHIP (Cap Hit of Injured Players).

This analysis covers every team up to its 20th game. (Amazingly, this follows on from my 10-game analysis.)

For a more regular snapshot, CHIP rankings are also being fed into Rob Vollman's Team Luck calculator on a weekly basis and I'll do my best to put out the same info via the medium known to Randy Carlyle as "that Wheatie machine or whatever" (@LW3H).

Alternatively...

Again,
for a different indicator of player "value", I've also
illustrated a similar metric based on TOI/G alongside the CHIP
numbers. Clearly, neither cap charge nor TOI/G are perfect
measures of player value, since each have a number of limitations
and inconsistencies, but they provide a decent comparison and the
results do vary somewhat.

A quick summary of the alternative metric:

TOI/G replaces cap charge as the measure of value in the calculation

For goalies, TOI/G has been worked out as Total Minutes Played / Games Dressed For*
- i.e. a goalie playing every minute of 75% of the games, zero in
the rest, would end up with a TOI/G of 45 minutes (or close to
it, once you factor in OT and so on). [*Actually, "Games Played
by Team - Games Missed by Goalie" - I'm not inclined to disentangle
any three-goalie systems or minor-league conditioning stints.]

This arguably overstates the worth of starting goalies somewhat,
but it's simple and you could equally argue that a workhorse goalie
is the hardest position to replace, so it's fair for them to have a
much higher TOI/G figure

Where a player hasn't played all year or where a player fairly clearly has a reduced
TOI/G figure due to getting injured in their only game or one of
very few games, I've used TOI/G from last season (or further
back if necessary)

For each player, multiply games missed by TOI/G to get (for a more palatable name) Cumulative Minutes of Injured Player (CMIP)

Take the aggregate of CMIP for the team and divide by games played by the team to arrive at AMIP
(Average Minutes of Injured Players) - it feels more
understandable expressing this metric as an average per game
(whereas CHIP is a running total)

The figures...
The table below shows:

Total CHIP for each team over the first 20 games of the regular season, as well as the distribution of CHIP by
position

The player who has contributed most to the team's CHIP figure

The number of players with a CHIP contribution of over $250,000
(think of it as being equivalent to a $1m player missing 20 games or a
$4m player missing five games)

AMIP for each team over the same period (e.g. an AMIP of 40:00
could be seen as the team missing two 20-minute per game players for
every game this season)

The following is a ranking of teams by CHIP over Games
11-20 only, to further illustrate some of the biggest movers since last
time:

10 second analysis...

The Central isn't injury central

Boston, Philadelphia and (to a lesser extent) Tampa Bay have been much healthier than it would appear if you deduct the totals from their pseudo-retired players (see below)

San Jose lead the way in Burns injuries

Ottawa will presumably start injuring their own players, if they run any sort of points-to-injury correlation analysis covering last season and this season only

Among Buffalo's throng of fringe NHLers/borderline AHLers/Grigorenkos, I had originally excluded Corey Tropp's (eventual 15-game) absence from their numbers, but have now included it since he played games 16-20

The next lists are the top 30 individual CHIP and CMIP contributions:

The CMIP table is goalie heavy (insert Brodeur gag here) as is usually the case. Carolina with four of the top 17 CHIP numbers, giving opposition team announcers something to talk about in the 30 seconds they have to spare between "Look! Two brothers on the same team!" conversation.

Where does it hurt?
This
is another update of the crude injury-by-location analysis. Again,
I’ve just used the descriptions found in the player profiles on tsn.ca,
so the figures will encompass all the inaccuracies and vagueness
within them. It should give a broad indication, if nothing else,
though.

An impressive early season showing for UBI/LBI cases, which only (?) made up 22% of the injury instances last season. As more players have come back from injuries pre-dating the season starting, the crude rate of
injuries (instances / total games played) has drifted down from 0.91 to 0.86, compared to 0.80 per
game last year (0.78 in 2011/12 and 0.76 in 2010/11).

Finally, a look at the Evasiveness
Index. This is basically the proportion of injury instances for each
team that have been described as either "Undisclosed" or the
helpfully pointless "Upper/Lower Body" in the same TSN profiles. I
have made no judgement about whether the many instances of "Illness"
(i.e. concussion), "Flu" (i.e. concussion) should also be included.

Phoenix and Carolina no strangers to the top of this table, Edmonton and Colorado no strangers to the other end.

Notes/Disclaimers

Figures
exclude a few minor-leaguers / marginal NHLers (usually an
arbitrary judgement on my part) who had
been on the NHL club’s IR since pre-season. Generally, if a
minor-leaguer gets called up and then injured in an NHL game, his games
missed will then count towards the CHIP though. Minor-league conditioning stints immediately after/during a
period on IR might be included in the man-games lost figures (but can't guarantee I get
it right every time)

For the avoidance of doubt, suspensions and absences due to
"personal reasons" are not included in the figures. However, as per
previous seasons, any "retired" player still under contract (Savard,
Pronger, Ohlund) is still included.

There are undoubtedly a few inaccuracies and inconsistencies in
there - I do the best I can with the information out there. Corrections might well be picked up in subsequent updates

The cap figure obviously doesn't really correlate very well to the "worth" of
a player in some cases, e.g. where players are seeing out an old (underpaid or
rookie) contract or where players are horrendously overpaid and/or were signed by Paul Holmgren

Also, for any player traded where cap hit is retained by his old
team, the cap hit used will only reflect that for his current team.

I've once again stuck a full team-by-team listing of games missed and CHIP/CMIP numbers by each player on the web HERE

Injury/games/TOI info courtesy of tsn.ca and nhl.com - man-games lost info more than likely does not exactly match up with the "official" figures released by individual teams