On 16/01/2013 Ben_E wrote:>On 16/01/2013 pmonks wrote:>>Anyone else think ODH sounds like he needs a good root? Not that I'm offering>>mind you - even I have standards!>>It's a little off-topic, but I've occasionally had the same thought and>considered organizing a chockstone fundraiser to have him serviced (for the public good, really). >>A shame; there's often good points hidden under his belligerent online tone (no idea what he's like in real life).

On 16/01/2013 ratherbeclimbinV9. wrote:>On 16/01/2013 Ben_E wrote:>>On 16/01/2013 pmonks wrote:>>>Anyone else think ODH sounds like he needs a good root? Not that I'm>offering>>>mind you - even I have standards!>>>>It's a little off-topic, but I've occasionally had the same thought and>>considered organizing a chockstone fundraiser to have him serviced (for>the public good, really). >>>>A shame; there's often good points hidden under his belligerent online>tone (no idea what he's like in real life).>
Why don't you retrospectively delete this droll sh1t like the rest of your worthless posts davidn?

On 16/01/2013 Climboholic wrote:>On 16/01/2013 ratherbeclimbinV9. wrote:>>On 16/01/2013 Ben_E wrote:>>>On 16/01/2013 pmonks wrote:>>>>Anyone else think ODH sounds like he needs a good root? Not that I'm>>offering>>>>mind you - even I have standards!>>>>>>It's a little off-topic, but I've occasionally had the same thought>and>>>considered organizing a chockstone fundraiser to have him serviced (for>>the public good, really). >>>>>>A shame; there's often good points hidden under his belligerent online>>tone (no idea what he's like in real life).>>>Why don't you retrospectively delete this droll sh1t like the rest of>your worthless posts davidn?

The better question might be whether you'd donate to buy Stugang something constructive to do with his free time ;)

I'm sure you'll get the usual complement of outraged responses.

Climboholic wins the first trolled award. If I was responsible for half the things people think I'm responsible for, I'd be buried next to Hitler (and thus Godwin's law is invoked just to round this out).

Although he certainly wrote more than the magic 6500 words on this forum, I am still coming to terms with where it goes from there.
If you want to follow hex posts, then follow the Tasmanian climbing forum, but being anonymous in more than one location, doesn't necessarily lead to an 'outing'?

On 16/01/2013 IdratherbeclimbingM9 wrote:>On 16/01/2013 One Day Hero wrote:>>Don't tell me that CliffD was Stugang! He was doing some pretty fuching>>good work if it was him.>>The userID CliffD doesn't seem to exist anymore, nor any posts by same...>Yet there still exists plenty of quotes of posts made by same.>>~> The plot sickens?

On 16/01/2013 shortman wrote:>On 16/01/2013 IdratherbeclimbingM9 wrote:>>On 16/01/2013 One Day Hero wrote:>>>Don't tell me that CliffD was Stugang! He was doing some pretty fuching>>>good work if it was him.>>>>The userID CliffD doesn't seem to exist anymore, nor any posts by same...>>Yet there still exists plenty of quotes of posts made by same.>>>>~> The plot sickens?>>He logs in as Cliff now.>>EDIT: And he is online now.>
You reckon it is the same person?