>Stores things on phone safely for years
>Decides to take a naked pic to see if sexy
>Tottally sexy :3
>HACKED
Or, you know, they could have made rational decisions instead of 'knowing' some L33t H4X0R was gonna swipe their shit. Hindsight bias is great and all, but it's not stupid to shoot a pic of your titties, just because a novel exploit may or may not be made. It's not their fault, and the only lesson to learn is strong passwords and fuck apple. People who say they shouldn't have taken nudes are mislead, who cares what they do, it wasn't a lapse in their security, it was one in some server, so in no way is this their fault

I'll be it started out as the idea that, when pointing fingers and yelling, maybe leave the victim outta THAT, since it won't help them learn and stop being victims. Plus, it probably comes off as excusing what's been done, and you KNOW folks get touchy about that.

But then people took it surface value and literally and now it's stupid

One follows the other. Gay people can't put a gun to a bakers head and say "bake me a cake for my gay marriage" if they can't get married.

If we can both agree on the right of association, then we both go home happy. If you're not going to agree to my thing, I'm not going to agree with your thing. You want freedom to marry another person of the same sex, I want the freedom for other people to not be forced into participating in your marriage. Let's meet half way, get the freedom of association and everyone is better off.

One follows the other. Gay people can't put a gun to a bakers head and say "bake me a cake for my gay marriage" if they can't get married.

If we can both agree on the right of association, then we both go home happy. If you're not going to agree to my thing, I'm not going to agree with your thing. You want freedom to marry another person of the same sex, I want the freedom for other people to not be forced into participating in your marriage. Let's meet half way, get the freedom of association and everyone is better off.

That's not what I'm talking about. It's that you're supporting restriction on the rights of a large group based on the actions of a small number of it's members. The two problems should be completely separate issues

Except they're not. The right of association goes both ways. Gays should have the right to associate with whomever they want and disassociate themselves with whomever they want. If a business has an unfavorable practice towards gays, gays shouldn't be forced to shop there. Similarly, business owners should have the right to associate with whomever they want and disassociate themselves with whomever they wan. If a business owner doesn't want to do business with gays, they shouldn't be forced to.

One follows the other. Gay people can't put a gun to a bakers head and say "bake me a cake for my gay marriage" if they can't get married.

If we can both agree on the right of association, then we both go home happy. If you're not going to agree to my thing, I'm not going to agree with your thing. You want freedom to marry another person of the same sex, I want the freedom for other people to not be forced into participating in your marriage. Let's meet half way, get the freedom of association and everyone is better off.

It was a stab at their moral hypocrisy. Everywhere you look, people are condemned because they're being "intolerant" while the intolerance of the people screaming "intolerant" is not shown frequently enough.