This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our world. Watch and become AWARE!
3.5 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.

I heard talk about this on radio days ago..
they 'forced' cars off
road into a parking lot, wanted mouth swabs, blood samples.. told drivers get
paid $ for the samples and acted like it was voluntary. I remember one girl
said she only did the breathilizer
test just so she could get away!

Federal contractors have been setting up
roadblocks in cities across the country with the purpose of collecting DNA
samples from passing motorists. The multi-million dollar federal program has
been disturbing drivers and alarming civil libertarians.

The checkpoints consist of uniformed agents
blocking a public road and flagging drivers into a testing area or a parking
lot. There, the drivers are requested to submit a saliva or blood sample to
the federal government.

The roadblocks were part of a study
orchestrated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
The agency contracted the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation,
based in Calverton, MD, to perform the roadblocks. The program costs
taxpayers $7.9 million over 3 years, according to NBC News Dallas-Fort Worth.

The agency confirmed that the operation is
currently being launched in 30 different U.S. cities.

Drivers are offered cash for surrendering DNA
samples. The going rate is $10 for a cheek-swab and $50 for blood drawn from
the vein. The goal, according to the NHTSA, is to decrease impaired-driving
accidents by analyzing raw bodily fluids fresh off the street.

“They want to find out of all the people
surveyed, how many people were driving with alcohol in their system, or
prescription drugs, things like that,” said Lt. Freddie Turrentine of the St.
Clair County Sheriff’s Department, in Pell City, Alabama.

Voluntary or not?

The NHTSA says that the samples are
“voluntary,” but drivers have had varying experiences.
“How voluntary is it when you have a police officer in uniform flagging you
down?”

Kim Cope, of North Fort Worth, Texas, said
that the checkpoint she experienced was not voluntary at all. She was forced
off the road into a parking lot on November 15th and pressured into
submitting to a breathalyzer. Cope was on her lunch break when she was forced
into the checkpoint. ”I gestured to the guy in front that I just wanted to go
straight, but he wouldn’t let me and forced me into a parking spot,” she said
to NBC Dallas-Fort Worth.

“They were asking for cheek swabs. They would
give $10 for that. Also, if you let them take your blood, they would pay you $50
for that.” But Cope was not interested in getting paid. “I finally did the
Breathalyzer test just because I thought that would be the easiest way to
leave.”

“How voluntary is it when you have a police
officer in uniform flagging you down?” asked Susan Watson, executive director
of the Alabama chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. “Are you going
to stop? Yes, you’re going to stop.”

“Although this was voluntary it was not
voluntary that you stop and hear the DNA for CASH pitch,” said Alabama resident
‘J. Bosey‘ after experiencing a checkpoint in June.

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

11

Followers

The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.