[chapman%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com: question @ SUBTYPEP-TOO-VAGUE]

My record says that we passed version 4 at the January meeting, Guy
produced version 5 in March, but that we didn't discuss version 5, postpone
version 5, or otherwise deal with version 5 at the March meeting. I think
this one fell between the cracks... right?
----- Begin Forwarded Messages -----
From: chapman%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com
Date: 1 May 89 13:08
To: @masinter@decwrl.dec.com
Subject: question @ SUBTYPEP-TOO-VAGUE
LM,
The last version I got of SUBTYPEP-TOO-VAGUE reads like it is
Version 5, but doesn't have Version 5 in the header. That's no
big deal, but since it has some big changes from Version 4, I
wondered if what I got was just a review copy or a final draft?
The reason you're getting this question (vs. KMP) is that your
name appeared twice and last in the revision list.
----- End Forwarded Messages -----