Fraud EDge

A practical take on fortifying anti-fraud training

May/June 2018

BySandra Damijan, Ph.D., CFE

In my
November/December 2017 column I wrote that academia should expand traditional forensic accounting programs so our future professionals can respond well to contemporary fraud issues. Many universities do include additional training on identifying and understanding fraudulent activities and are hiring more instructors with practical experience.

Diane Jamieson, a student experience leader at Sheffield Hallam University in the U.K. (and a member of the ACFE Anti-Fraud Education Partnership), has taught forensic accounting to graduate students for nearly 10 years and undergraduates for six years. She helped establish both programs, which meet the criteria required by the U.K.’s Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

When Jamieson joined the university in 2010 she discovered she needed to redesign both existing programs because previous instructors, who didn’t have any practical experience, could only teach theory and not its application. She drew on her 17 years in forensic accounting at KPMG to include the practical aspects of fraud examination and dispute resolution topics in the programs’ designs to ensure students receive the anti-fraud education they’ll be able to apply when they graduate.

Jamieson faced several challenges in developing and expanding the two programs. Few students, in the beginning, wanted to enroll in the specialized courses.

Related Articles

Where are these three infamous cases now?

Over the last few issues I’ve explained numerous financial reporting schemes using cases that might be obscure to some. However, in this column, I revisit three cases that captured the headlines when their stories first broke. Since then, their sagas have been relegated to the back pages, but they continue to have interesting developments.

This issue’s cookbook is devoted to two recent and interesting cases involving revenue manipulation — the most popular method of cooking the books. But I serve up several menu options in these cases. Which would you prefer today: round-tripping, channel stuffing or perhaps an order of side deals? Let’s get cooking.

One of the more fascinating aspects of financial reporting fraud cases is the element of intent. Unlike asset misappropriations and most corruption cases, fraudulent intent isn’t always as obvious when the charges involve financial statement manipulation.