Think about it, if we aren't hiring Kelly, the guy is outed as a fraud. In that scenario, Stricklin has no motive to respond to some random. If we do hire Kelly, it makes it seem like he knows what he's talking about in that post. Stricklin is trying to protect Foley.

Click to expand...

Not necessarily. If we don't hire the Chips, a lot will go back to these rumors and say that Foley had something to do with it.

Well if we don't hire CK, and someone asks Storkland about whether the rumor of Foley's influence was true, he can say nahh, that was never true, that's why I made a point of shooting that down.

Click to expand...

Come to think of it, the only reason he would need to respond to that tweet is if he is not planning on hiring Chipster. If he hires CK, then water under the bridge, no one would give a flying f about what Foley may or may have not said, so why respond? But if we don't hire him, then the world will go ballistic and blame Foley.

All jokes aside, this is much more fun than the last coaching search on here. I think we all are confident (even if we play skeptical on this baord) that we're not about to be stuck with a dumpster fire of a coach.