Political Views and DiscussionsThis is an "Enter At Your Own Risk" forum so if you make a fool out of yourself or otherwise make enemies you do so voluntarily and won't be protected or bailed out by the management. If we see this spilling out into the other areas of the site the offender or offenders will be denied access to the Political Forum for a while. "You Have Been Duly Informed."

Welcome to the 6.7L Cummins Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

And nothing on here about it. (Health Care Reform)
Ok, just my opinion; I find it interesting that the proposals are focused on covering everyone versus removing costs from the system. If we found ways to remove costs wouldn't that mean more people could be covered for the same price today. And no tort reform is ridiculous!
I'm glad the stock market has somewhat recovered even though I'm not optimistic it will continue in its current path. (I hope it does)

A difficult question to answer. I thought this was all about healthcare reform; making it easier for individuals to get coverage and keep coverage, take unnecessary costs out of the system, improve the quality (interesting how when we are viewed as a world leader already), reduce the 11-16% premium increases year over year. That kind of increase is just not sustainable for any of us over the longer term. There are lots of views and opinions. So, lets take a look at where the money is spent that is collected from premiums. PricewaterhouseCoopers Cost Study 2008