If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

The Observer is reporting that the penciled in Wrestlemania Card right now is....

Taker vs Lesnar (Supposedly, this is the only one that is "locked" in.)
Punk vs HHH
Randy Orton vs Batista
Daniel Bryan vs HBK (Shawn hasn't officially said that he would wrestle yet...if he can't, I'm not sure where they would put him)

Re: The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

I gotta side with Matt on this, it's not like they demoted Bryan to curtain jerking. If this match does come to pass it's Bryan vs Michaels, it's gonna steal the show. I know though that i'll be hearing all about how this is a depush for Bryan and they have no faith in him.

Michaels last 3 opponents at Mania have been Cena, Flair and Taker, quite a nifty little club.

A ton and a half of credit to Rad for this superb artwork

Originally Posted by The Miz

I'd rather you all hate me for everything I am than love me for something i'm not

Originally Posted by Flick Rare

Come on guys! You llike who you like and that's never wrong. Unless you like Eva Marie.

Re: The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

Not enough tables in the world for me to flip. There is no gif angry enough.

I don't like any of it.

Batista/Orton is a waste of Dave Batista. Taker/Lesnar means nothing to be because I don't give a shit about MMA or "legit shoot, bro" stuff. Bryan/Shawn means Bryan isn't getting a title match.

I don't like any of it. I won't acknowledge John Cena/Bray Wyatt.

Totally agree. Taker vs Lesner sucks. I get why they THINK it's a draw, but it isnt. Taker's match is one of the reasons I watch WM. This is actually a deterent.
Cena vs Bray? Why? I'd rather see Cena vs Lesner and Taker vs. Bray.
Randy Orton vs Batista. Nope. Big fan of Batista, this will be a painful match for me to watch.
Punk vs HHH. I can get behind it, but think Punk is better served somewhere else.
HBK vs. DB. Okay, I love this

-The Undertaker: It will always be his Yard
-FOREVER A WARRIOR
-NXT gives me HOPE for the Future
-KCCO

---θ---

Currently playing:PS4: Fallout 4, The Division, Homefront, Doom, Assassin's Creed: Syndicate, Transformers: Devastation, Life is StrangeMobile: Tapped Out, Forge of Empires, GrowCastleIGN for every Game I play and PSN: StefulsonFeel free to add me.

Re: The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

I love the idea of Cena vs Wyatt if we can't get Cena vs Taker. Gives the Wyatt Family a hell of a rub, and allows Cena to move out of the main event picture (one would assume...).

Rest of the card... I'll believe HBK's coming out of retirement when I see it, so Bryan's position worries me. I've also see enough of Orton/Batista, bleh. The other two are fine, though I'd still take Bryan over Punk to take on HHH.

Re: The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

And it's not just that match, I don't like ANY of this. None of it. It's literally the polar opposite of everything I'd like.

Which means it's exactly what's going to happen.

I think the only issue I really have with it is that a lot of it is going to be dependent on a strong buildup. I've never thought Bryan was going to win the title at Mania, that never occurred to me as part of the story arc. No matter how many times WWE tries to brand the WWE Champion as "the face of the WWE," most of their main event revolves around stories that aren't the title. That's been the trend for years now. Even when the title is involved, it's happenstance, not a title chase. The title was a footnote in Cena/Rock 2.

I've already talked myself into Brock/Taker because there's really nobody that I'd actively think would beat Taker this year (including Cena) and Taker just won't have a bad match at this point.

I'm like 90% sure they brought Big Dave back after they sketched out the card and said "Uhh, guys, who the hell is going to face Orton?" That match isn't going to be a classic, but they can at least tell a decent story, especially if Orton is working like he's worked for the past few months.

Punk's aping Bryan's natural match, and he's kind of been shoehorned into this, but if he's motivated, they'll do a good build and have a good match. The infamous Punk/Trips match was actually a really good match.

Bryan/Michaels, I've already said I have a total blindspot for, it's on my Mount Rushmore of dream matches, and I would spend the money even if it was the only match on the card.

Cena/Wyatt is such a wild card. It kinda terrifies me because I've seen Cena blow through these types of factions before, but then again, he never beat the Shield, so maybe he won't just blow through them. That being said, it should at least be a unique build, and I have a lot of faith in Bray as a worker.

Originally Posted by MrAndersons Mic

Im posting my thoughts not for them to be debated or argued against. I would like for folks to understand and agree with my point of view while throwing dookie at the McMahons and laughing at it.

Re: The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

Batista/Orton is a waste of Dave Batista. Taker/Lesnar means nothing to be because I don't give a shit about MMA or "legit shoot, bro" stuff. Bryan/Shawn means Bryan isn't getting a title match.

I don't like any of it. I won't acknowledge John Cena/Bray Wyatt.

I rather see Batista/Lesnar and Taker/Cena (I know I've been against the match in the past) at WrestleMania but again that's just me.

As for Daniel Bryan/Shawn Michaels I'm all for it as it'll no doubt be a great match up and as for the others well I'm not sure I'd maybe leave Hunter off of the card and go with CM Punk/Randy Orton for the title with Punk walking out as Champion (assuming Orton is still champion by then).

Re: The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

"It will all be payed off at Wrestlemania! Stop being impatient, it has to be at Wrestlemania, Bryan will get his revenge there, that's the plan!"

...

"Wrestlemania? Meh, they'll do it later, it pays off for this subjective dream match."

Personally, I don't care, I was expecting this for quite some time, anyway.

I mean, logically, Wrestlemania should have been the Bryan/HHH match. It really should have been locked in stone. And that's clearly where they were going for a while. But Bryan/Michaels is a match with a comparable story that still involves Bryan getting one over on Triple H. It expands the overarching story past Wrestlemania, which I kinda like, because this story still has plenty of layers left in it.

Plus it will be one hell of a match, and one hell of a moment. That's really all I care about in my wrestling-based entertainment.

Originally Posted by MrAndersons Mic

Im posting my thoughts not for them to be debated or argued against. I would like for folks to understand and agree with my point of view while throwing dookie at the McMahons and laughing at it.

Re: The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

Man that card is boring, I mean at least they are putting Orton and Batista together. I have no desire to see Punk/HHH or Taker/Lesnar.

"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs."

Re: The Observer gives some Wrestlemania info....

Originally Posted by Matt

I mean, logically, Wrestlemania should have been the Bryan/HHH match. It really should have been locked in stone. And that's clearly where they were going for a while. But Bryan/Michaels is a match with a comparable story that still involves Bryan getting one over on Triple H. It expands the overarching story past Wrestlemania, which I kinda like, because this story still has plenty of layers left in it.

Plus it will be one hell of a match, and one hell of a moment. That's really all I care about in my wrestling-based entertainment.

I don't believe the story has many layers left, it was stretched so thin because "WRESTLEMANIA", to the point where even you claimed a couple of times they were fucking up.

And after months of being yelled at for thinking like that and not "being patient for Mania", this happens and all of those months of endured crap are dismissed and neatly swept under the rug? No, thanks.