First came the news, only days ago, that a scandal-seeking website has just been launched by Kathleen Willey, one of the women who publicly accused then-President Bill Clinton of sexual harassment. Then Linda Tripp, the one-time White House staffer who blew the whistle on the Clinton-Lewinsky affair, suddenly stepped back into the spotlight to accuse Hillary Clinton of ruthlessly and mercilessly trying to destroy the women who pointed the sex-abuse finger at Bill.

Now, like a flurry of gut-punches delivered in a high-stakes prize fight, another bombshell of a body blow has hit the former first lady, already reeling from bad press and bad polls.

A man who used to be an investigative reporter for The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal — a prize-winning journalist who is now a best-selling author — has just dropped an allegation that threatens to further damage a Hillary Clinton presidential campaign that already appears to be in an ominous tailspin.

Ronald Kessler has told a radio talk show host on WPHT in Philadelphia that the marriage between Hillary and Bill Clinton is not based on love and loyalty, rather on power and profit, as well as their all-consuming desire to return to the White House in 2016.

Kessler, the author of “The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents,” was talking with radio personality Chris Stigall when he confirmed what many Clinton watchers have long suspected:

“Agents say that it’s a business relationship. It’s not a marriage at all. It’s a total fake, like everything else about Hillary. It’s just a big show and a scam.”

The description of the Clinton marriage as “a total fake” doesn’t come out of nowhere, of course. Wednesday’s dirt-dishing by Kessler was not the first time the top author has pulled back the curtain on the Clinton White House to reveal dirty little secrets about both Bill and Hillary.

He has talked about Bill’s “blonde, busty mistress” who would visit “Slick Willy” when then-Secretary of State Clinton was away from their New York home. And in a March 10, 2015 piece in The Washington Times, Kessler wrote extensively about Hillary’s mean and nasty demeanor that made Secret Service agents dread being assigned to her detail.

“If you want to know why Hillary Clinton thought she could get away with violating federal regulations in order to conceal her emails when she was secretary of state, take a look behind the facade,” Kessler wrote in the Times.

“Mrs. Clinton pretends to be a compassionate woman who cares about the little people and will champion the middle class if elected president. The reality is that behind the scenes, she is abusive to those same people.”

“The First Family Detail,” which has just been released in paperback, is described in promotional material as presenting first-hand accounts of Hillary’s extremely disagreeable disposition.

Because Hillary Clinton is so nasty to agents, being assigned to her protective detail is considered a form of punishment and the worst assignment in the Secret Service.

As of this writing, there’s no indication that either Hillary Clinton or any aides have replied to the latest bombshell that claims her marriage is as phony as her campaign for president.

It would seem that, for Hillary and Bill and the Democrats who want another Clinton in the Oval Office, the chickens are coming home to roost…and quite possibly creating a messy panic in the coop.

Just one day after Western Journalism told you about the new scandal-hunting website launched by Kathleen Willey — who famously claimed the former president sexually assaulted her in the White House — another key figure from the Clintons’ questionable past has leveled her own scathing charges against Hillary.

In a Daily Mail exclusive, the British newspaper reveals that the woman who outed Monica Lewinsky for her affair with President Clinton is now on the warpath against Hillary. Citing the then-first lady as a “destroyer” who ruthlessly attacked and ruined the reputations of many women linked sexually to her husband, Linda Tripp is quoted in the Daily Mail as saying that Hillary Clinton “must never become president” because she’s a devious and manipulative liar.

Because, according to Linda Tripp, it was Hillary who manipulated and stage managed the story [of the Lewinsky affair], converting herself from a lackluster First Lady with unimpressive approval ratings to admirable First Victim – the blindsided wife standing by her man.

She made him forgivable. She ‘orchestrated the cover up’ and she made damn sure that she moved on. Nothing, and no-one, was going to stand in her way.

Now 65 years old, Tripp has chosen to break her ten-year silence as Hillary seems all but destined to become the Democrat nominee for president in 2016. Once a White House aide with an office right next to Mrs. Clinton’s West Wing power center, Tripp tells the Daily Mail that Hillary is “unscrupulous,” “deceitful,” and “inherently dishonorable.”

She describes Hillary as the true ‘ruler’ of the White House through her husband’s administration; tells how she watched Hillary ‘blatantly lie’ to the American people; describes her as utterly ‘ruthless’ in her pursuit of power; and voices her belief that Hillary must never gain the presidency – the position that has always been her goal and to which she has always believed herself entitled.

Regarding the current emailgate scandal that continues to plague Hillary from her time as secretary of state, Linda Tripp says the former chief diplomat is pursuing a familiar strategy in trying to get past the controversy surrounding her use of a private email account maintained on a personal server.

Her modus operandi was, and continues to be, Tripp explained: ‘I will do what I want and then when I’m questioned I will say, “oops,” or “bureaucratic snafu”, and then after a couple of months her refrain will be, “this is old news, it’s been investigated, I did nothing wrong, let’s move on, it’s time to address the issues facing the middle class of America.”

Earlier this year, Western Journalism reported that one of Bill Clinton’s alleged sexual assault victims transitioned into a vocal opponent of his wife’s current presidential campaign.

In April, Kathleen Willey said of Hillary Clinton: “I haven’t seen one single accomplishment that would give her the credentials to be president of the United States.”

The scathing critique went further, as Willey called Clinton a “serial liar” who would attract scandals daily as the 2016 campaign drags on.

“Women should pay attention to what she’s done to other women,” Willey concluded, “and not just the women who were unfortunate to cross paths with her husband.”

According to a recent BizPac Review article, Willey has compounded her anti-Clinton stance by launching a new website to solicit accusations from other potential sexual assault victims.

“I think it’s time for people to start coming forward,” she said of those she believes were victimized by the former president. “I know I’m not the only one.”

Furthermore, she explained the site will address other Clinton scandals from a seemingly inexhaustible list.

“The Clintons have made it extremely easy for me,” she said. “I don’t have to do a lot of research, because it’s not just a scandal a day. It’s about two or three scandals a day.”

Willey concluded that she envisions her new endeavor as “kind of a compilation of these scandals” along with a simple explanation of each “so most people can understand what’s going on and what they’re up to and why they are lying every day.”

Prince Bandar Bin Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud of Saudi Arabia sent a letter to the Washington Post in which he wrote that President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran is worse than the nuclear pact former President Bill Clinton made with North Korea. Prince Bandar Bin Sultan was Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States from 1981 to 2005.

His devastating critique of Obama’s policy toward Iran must be regarded as the official Saudi reaction to the nuclear agreement between Iran and six world powers. Until now, the Saudi rulers have been very careful not to openly criticize the deal. King Salman has remained silent since the announcement of the agreement, and the only official reaction came from an unidentified Saudi official who told CNN that the deal was a “monumental historical miscalculation.”

President Obama discussed the nuclear agreement with Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir on Friday. The White House later claimed that the Saudi FM had welcomed the agreement with Iran.

Prince Bandar wrote in his letter that he does not agree with the pundits who are saying “Obama’s deal with Iran stirs a déjà vu of President Clinton’s 1994 nuclear agreement with North Korea.”

“President Clinton made his decision based on a strategic foreign policy analysis, top-secret intelligence and a desire to save the people of North Korea from starvation induced by its leadership,” Prince Bandar wrote.

“It turned out that the strategic foreign policy analysis was wrong. If Mr. Clinton had known about the major intelligence failure, he would have made a different decision.” Mr. Obama made his decision on the Iran nuclear deal aware that the strategic foreign policy analysis, the national intelligence information and intelligence from U.S. allies in the region predict a worse outcome than in North Korea — and Iran will have access to billions of dollars.

He continued:

This deal will wreak havoc in the Middle East, which is already a disastrous environment. Iran is a major player in the destabilization of the region. Why would Mr. Obama go ahead with such a deal with Iran? It is definitely not because Mr. Obama is not smart enough, because he is. He must believe that what he is doing is right. Still, I am convinced that my good friend Henry Kissinger was correct when he said, “America’s enemies should fear America, but America’s friends should fear America more.”

“People in my region now are relying on God’s will and consolidating their local capabilities and analyses with everyone except (for) our oldest and most powerful ally.”

His remark about the people in the region now “consolidating their local capabilities” should be taken as a warning that Saudi Arabia could now go nuclear as well. The Saudi threat contradicts what President Obama claimed last week after the announcement of the nuclear deal with Iran. Obama said during an address to the nation that his administration “has stopped the spread of nuclear weapons” in the Middle East.

As Western Journalism reported earlier, Saudi Arabia has for a long time cooperated with Pakistan on the nuclear issue and is providing financial support for Pakistan’s nuclear program.

In March, after the announcement of the Lausanne interim agreement between six world powers and Iran, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif of Pakistan visited Saudi Arabia and reportedly discussed nuclear cooperation between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. At the same time, Saudi Arabia signed a nuclear deal with President Park of South Korea. South Korea will build two nuclear reactors in the Kingdom.

“Sharif’s visit to Riyadh came after Pakistan’s Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee General Rashid Mahmoud attended a series of top-level meetings with Saudi leaders about nuclear cooperation at the beginning of February. Business Insider reported at the time that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan could have renewed a secret nuclear weapons pact during Mahmoud’s visit and an earlier visit by PM Sharif at the end of January,” we reported at the time.

In May, Western Journalism reported that Saudi Arabia already might have purchased an “off the shelf” nuclear weapon from Pakistan. An anonymous U.S. official was the source of the report. He said: ”There has been a longstanding agreement in place with the Pakistanis (over nuclear weapons) and the House of Saud has now made the strategic decision to move forward.”

The Wall Street Journal interviewed Prince Faisal bin Saud bin Abdulmohsen, a scholar at the King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies in the Saudi capital, at the same time.

“Our allies aren’t listening to us, and this is what is making us extremely nervous,” he said.

“If I am basing my judgment on the track record and our experience with Iran, I will say they will do anything in their power to get a nuclear weapon. A delay of 10 years is not going to satiate anything.”

“Should Iran gain the ability to produce weapons-grade uranium and ability to deploy such weapons,” developing a Saudi capability in response “would be considered as part of our homeland security,” he told the Wall Street Journal

The sense of abandonment by the U.S. described by Prince Bandar will force Saudi Arabia to develop its own strategies together with other regional opponents of Iran such as Egypt, Jordan, and even Israel.

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu is said to have secret contacts with Saudi Arabia, and Israeli and Saudi officials have met at least five times since the beginning of the year to discuss the Iranian threat.

Bloomberg TV’s With All Due Respect co-host Mark Halperin may not have been too impressed with Hillary Clinton’s performance during her CNN interview last Tuesday, but he did notice that she sounds amazingly like her husband Bill when answering questions:

But in her interview with CNN yesterday it is pretty clear that Hillary Clinton has learned a ton from the master she’s married to.

Halperin then played a video montage that compared previous Bill Clinton quotes with those of Hillary’s CNN interview.

Even though it’s been more than 14 years since Bill Clinton has been in office, after watching the video I couldn’t help but get a feeling of déjà vu.

This article originally appeared at AIM.org and is reprinted here with permission.