The criminal complaint against Anthony Albert Gomez said police found grisly evidence on his cellphone: video clips of a chain saw being used to sever
a dog's head.
.....
Gomez also said Brown was present for the decapitation, which she denied to police, the complaint said.
.....
Shirley Brown said she and Crystal immediately suspected Gomez, who she said once dated the teen and expressed jealousy when she began dating someone
else.

Originally posted by stumason
The dude is one sick puppy (excuse the pun) and should be punished, but executing him? A little OTT for a dog, people.

While I agree with what you are saying, as I strongly oppose the violence we are seeing here as well, I do disagree that a dogs life has little worth.
I'm more of a cat person myself, but regardless of what the animal is, it is a life. I love my pets like children, and I baby them as such. If
someone were to decapatate my pet, I would hold a strong hatred for them. I would not condone their death, but I do believe it should come with a
hefty prison sentence. If it is not appropriate to treat fellow humans like that, it should not be appropriate to treat animals like that. I take
animal cruelty very serious.

If it came down to saving the life of a domesticated pet or a human life, I would always save the human life. But the life of a pet has plenty of
worth, in my opinion.

Stinky, smelly, dirty, etc., yeah they are. But they also provide the most selfless friendship a man can ask for. They trust us to do them no harm.
When that trust is broken, it can be fairly upsetting for both of us.

From reading another article on the story, www.crimelibrary.com...
where the Grandmother goes into some detail about the girl, it sounds like the girl has a history of loving dogs.....even saved one from a car,
getting her own legs broken. Unless of course the Grandmother is lying....and there should be hospital records to corroberate.

If the girl was there, I'm sure the police will make every effort to prove it, since she and the Grandmother 'went over the heads' of the
police dept. ( In the article, she says that she went to the mayor's office and press after the first officers supposedly laughted about it
and told her to just throw the evidence away.)

Just curious iori, if killing is wrong 99.9% of the time then why to you have a murdering piece of human debis, Che Guevara, as your avatar? I
believe this subhuman trash should be found and removed from civilization. If they are able to do this, then it will not be long before it happens to
a person.

I have to wonder why the police don’t seem to be taking this very seriously. First, the way that the police acted at a crime scene was extremely
unprofessional besides being very callous toward the family. Secondly, why aren’t they stacking charges against the perpetrator?

Normally when they arrest someone they stack as many charges against them as possible knowing that the person is going to try and plea out, so by
stacking charges they put the person away for at least a bit longer. In this instance they should be stacking assault and aggravated stalking charges
against this man besides the animal cruelty and torture charges.

The family needs to get a protection injunction against this man too, which also counts against his record as a domestic violence charge, prevents him
from obtaining any weaponry, and makes it an immediate felony if he shows up around the family again.

Edit to add:

As long as I am on a rant here, I might as well put in about the officers receiving a reprimand. That is basically a slap on the wrist. Why aren’t
these officers being given a suspension for conduct unbecoming an officer? With the amount of people coming out of police academies that cannot get on
a force, these guys need to have some stricter rules once they are on the force. Maybe then this kind of unprofessional behavior would stop…

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.