Geneva College Stands for Religious Freedom

Dr. Ken Smith, president of Geneva College in western Pennsylvania, intends to pay a fine to the federal government rather than comply with the federal government’s mandate that forces institutions to provide abortion-inducing drugs, contraception and sterilization to its employers.

The mandate, scheduled to be effective on Aug. 1, could financially penalize institutions for not complying with Department of Health and Human Services demands that blatantly undermine religious freedom. Placed in a challenging situation, this small, Presbyterian, liberal-arts college located in Beaver Falls, PA, will likely be forced to drop health-care insurance altogether, resulting in steep fines.

“We would rather pay the fine than violate our conscience,” Smith said in an interview with Scribe.

That fine is hefty. Assuming the mandate stands, “There will be a significant financial impact on the college because we cannot be compelled to take action that violates our conscience. If [the fines] are over half a million dollars, we’d have to find a way to absorb that.”

Geneva College, which was founded in 1848, holds the position that human life begins at conception. While it provides coverage for birth-control drugs that act before conception, its contract with its health-insurance provider excludes coverage for elective abortions and abortion-inducing drugs.

“In our case, specifically, it is the coverage of abortion-inducing drugs that have been labeled by the FDA and marketed as contraceptives, but the affect of which really causes abortion,” Smith said.

Moreover, Smith, acknowledging the complexity of the college budgeting process, says that fines may impact students’ scholarships and cut other resources — academic and athletic.

Student reaction to Geneva’s response has been overwhelmingly positive, evident by the sustained applause following a press conference featuring officials from Geneva College and the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), Geneva’s legal representation.

Kevin Scavo, a senior at Geneva College studying computer science, said, “A lot of students were at the press conference showing their support for the college.”

Geneva College officials took the stand against the law because they believe it is unconstitutional and violates the First Amendment. Scavo continued, “This is a risky move for them, and I really admire the fact that they’re able to make a stand and go the whole nine yards.”

“The issue that we have with the entire law is that the Obama administration has tried to define religion as being that which what churches do. We believe that religion takes us into the marketplace. There is both an internal community of faith responsibility of religion, but there is also an external service to community. That is religion,” said Smith.

The government has narrowly defined religious liberty in the mandate, disqualifying for an exemption those institutions that work in their communities, in accordance with their beliefs, to serve those outside their own faith. In other words, such institutions cannot practice what they preach.

“The First Amendment says that the government won’t make laws that inhibit free exercise of religion,” said Smith.

Heritage’s research has found that the mandate burdens religiously motivated work by endangering the resources of many hospitals, social-service groups and schools through a financial fine on faith. Meanwhile, hardworking college students also suffer at the expense of the government, as the HHS mandate threatens resources of institutions that make significant contributions to society.

The HILLSDALE COLLEGE in Michigan remains "The Gold Standard" — NO GOVERNMENT LOAN FUNDING – and PRESENTLY ONLY @ TWO PERCENT [ * 2% * ] "STUDENT LOAN DEFAULT RATE"! ** No publicly funded college NOR university IN THE U.S. CAN COME EVEN REMOTELY CLOSE!

I graduated from Geneva in 1991. It was a fantastic school but this stance will do more harm than good. By not providing health insurance and paying those fines you will potentially lose good faculty that already share the values you support and won't have abortions anyway. In addition when you pay out huge fines you can potentially lower the quality of education. Abortions are individual choices that people will have if covered by insurance or not. I personally agree, an abortion is wrong and I believe this law is uncostitutional. Challenge the constitutionality of the law. Don't pay the government more money in the form of fines so they can continue to chip away at our religous freedoms. I believe this stance will harm individuals and the greater good, not help it. I agree with your principle but I strongly believe you need to rethink your method of protest!

Don’t have time to read the Washington Post or New York Times? Then get The Morning Bell, an early morning edition of the day’s most important political news, conservative commentary and original reporting from a team committed to following the truth no matter where it leads.

Email address

Ever feel like the only difference between the New York Times and Washington Post is the name? We do. Try the Morning Bell and get the day’s most important news and commentary from a team committed to the truth in formats that respect your time…and your intelligence.