Month: November 2011

Fernando Brazier , 28 committed suicide just a few hours after his marriage ceremony to the mother of his two children Trudian Hay.

This photo of the two of them walking down the isle is haunting. Look at Fernando’s body language. He is stiff. He leans away from his bride. There is no smile on his face. He is wide-eyed and there appears to be an enormous amount of tension around his mouth and shoulder area a he awkwardly hold his bride’ hand. He does not look like a man who is happily in love or happy to be married.

Trudian Hay, who is also the mother of his two young daughters has no clue what he was about to do a few hours later.

In contrast, she appears to be elated and in a world of her own. She is laughing. Her head and body is turned away from Fernando as she has no clue that he looks extremely uncomfortable, upset and almost on a state of shock as he completed saying his vows and walked down the isle.

No one seemed to notice Fernando’s misery as he and the bride kissed as they all looked on , sharing in what they thought was the couple’s mutual joy. If you look closely at their post marital kiss he is stiff and non responsive.

It is Trudian who appears to be more dominant in reaching up to kiss him as indicated by the way she is straining and elongating her neck. He doesn’t bend down to meet her kiss. He is ridged in his posture and there appears to be no joy expressed in his face. It is the complete opposite facial expression that his bride has on her face. TO READ MORE CLICK LINK BELOW

Bob Costas asked Jerry Sandusky if he ever touched the genitals of any boy. As Sandusky replied that he didn’t, his voice quality sounded shaky and tentative.

Then Costas said if this is not so, then you must be the unluckiest man and most persecuted man we have ever heard of.

Jerry pauses for several seconds and then chuckles. This reaction is contrary to anyone who was not guilty. An innocent person would immediately jump in with no pause time ans say YES, I AM, using a very formidable and unwavering tone.

Costas then says it again and Sandusky pasues for five seconds and chuckles a nervous laugh and immediately releases a burst of air. Needless to say this question has taken literally taken the wind or the air out of him as you literally hear it in the audio.

Then Sandusky says in a weak tone, “ I don’t know what you want me to say WHAT????? Want you to say???? This is a signal of guilt. He is now depending on what others want him to say and does not relay what he needs to say. In essence he nothing to say except that he is guilty.

You can believe that his attorney is helping him to spin what to say. Also why is this man doing interviews if he has an attorney? Is he defying his attorney? Is he defying his attorney? What kind of attorney wiuld allow his client to speak out at this point?

Sandusky’s voice quality and speech behaviors alone are incriminating him in my view.

Then he says I don’t think theses have been the best days of my life as he burst out air . This air burst indicates that he is having a hard time coordinating his breathing with his talking which is a HUGE indicator of nervousness and deception. His statement also minimizes the serious of what is happening to him which indicates that he is in the initial shock phases and in a state of denial.

Costas then asks him a great question. Costas asks how would you define the part you played? What are you willing to concede that was wrong and and you wish you hadn’t done it?

Sandusky once again takes a gulp of audible air indicating that this question has once agin knocked the wind out fo him. He then practically wispers and mumbles his answer , which is an indicator guilt and shame . He says I I should have (long pause) showered with those kids. The telling part here vocally speaking is that he goes up at the end of the sentence on the words kids as though he was asking a question. The empahasis on the world kids means that deep down he really didn’t think it was wrong to shower with those kids. It’s only wong because he got busted.Also the hesitation is a signal of extreme distress.

Then he mumbles a guilty sounding you know so . In essence , he is trying to minimize his actions and seeking reassurance with the words you know . He ends his statement on the word so because he has nothing else to say .

Here is the give away “tell” or signal that says it all. Costas asks him if he is a pedophile. Sandusky immediately replies No! Then Costs rephrases the question ands says Are you sexually attracted to young boys? Just so you are aware, this is how sociopaths often respond to questions. You may ask them a direct question and get a completely different answer than when you rephrase the question. Sandusky also parrots the question and repeats Am I sexually attracted to young boys?

When someone answers a question with a question or repeats your question, they are usually GUILTY!!! That is one of the biggest tells of deception.

Then Sandusky further inceiminates himself verbally by contimuing on and saying sexually attracted. I I enjoy young people.’

His repetion of the wordssexually attracted thrown out there without a pronoun or a verb speaks volumes, Singling these two words out as a phrase in itself ndicates that he very well may be sexually attracted to them.

Then he says I I love to be around them . But no I’m not sexually attracted to young boys. He dies off at the end of his statement which is very significant in my view. As he in essence is swallowing his words and swallowing the truth. Note how he calls young boys them . It illustrates how he has objectified his victims.

Jerry Sandusky shows us that no matter who a person is or what their position is, it in possible to find pedophiles in any walk of life and in any socioeconomic group or social strata. Even pillars of society who do charity work can be sexual deviants. We need to stop playing The Emperor Has New Clothes when he in fact is not wearing any. We need to see what is, not what we want to see. As soon as we see this behavior we need to make sure the person is held accountable for their actions.

There is no question in my mind that he is acting like a person who has a lot of guilt , shame, and embarrassment at being exposed and who most likely is guilty.

After reading the Grand Jury transcript I felt like throwing up. This is an extremely deviant and sick man. True they are just allegations and he has not yet been found guilty by a court of law at this time. But in reading these allegations , it appears that they all have a pattern to them that is both shocking and sickening. He is either wrestling, showering, or cracking some young boy’s back. Like most predators he has followed a similar ritual in abusing his victims.

There is no rehabilitation for a pedophile because they are imprinted with this sexual perversion forever.He needs to be locked up forever with no possibility of parole. He has essentially murdered the souls and the psyches of these young boys, many who have now grown into young men.

All the millions of dollars he has earned during his coaching years needs to go for psychological treatment for these boys because after he got his hands on them, they were never the same. What makes matters even worse is that he took full advantage of young boys who were troubled and/or disadvantaged. That makes his crime even more egregious.

I say lock him up and throw away the key and make him do some hard labor in prison instead of his sitting around doing nothing on the taxpayers money. I say get as much use out of him, whether it be making license plates or some other item that is made in prisons.

He needs to be released into the general population so he can see what it feels like to be helpless and victimized. No doubt if this is the case, he will not survive long which may actually be a blessing to all.

As you know by now I cannot stand SPIN, fakeness, phoniness, lies and manipulation. I hate it when people think that the public is dumb and will buy any story put in front of them.

As someone with no political agenda I am able to see things objectively and clearly . So no matter who the candidate is, I don’t like what is being done to them. That is the case with candidate Herman Cain and his latest accuser Sharon Bialeck. Her accusations were made at the side of strong Demoratic supporter Gloria Allred, who made sure she stood breast to breast with Sharon, to insure she got into every photo op shot of the two of them together.

So what is wrong with this picture (besides the fact Gloria Allred is in it)? What is wrong with the picture is that

her story makes NO sense whatsoever as she inadvertently ends up painting herself as the aggressor and not the victim

BIALEKS’ BODY SAYS OF TELLS OF DECEPTION

Body language wise, as I watched her over the top recitation at the presser, it wasobvious to me that she was most likely in my view making this stuff up. If she is telling some truth then she is disgruntled because

she hit Cain up for a job when she was fired and he didn’t come through for her,

and or someone put her up to this (like perhaps Gloria Allred who may possibly have solicited her as a client) ,

and or she is desperate for her 15 minutes of fame in hopes that it will help her career.

The fact that this allegedly happened 14 years ago is suspect in itself . Why did she not come forward then? And don’t tell me she is a victim of sexual harassment who suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.

She didn’t look much like she had PTSS when she smiled and showed the most incongruent elated facial expression at the end of her speech as she implored Cain to make things right. Then she gives a political speech about the times we are in and the leaders we need. People with PTTS don’t talk like that. There is clearly an agenda here in my view.

Look at Gloria, who can’t even look at her client. In fact, she doesn’t look at Bialeck throughout the whole presser. Allred clearly knows the drill and has obviously orchestrated all of this public zoo like drama as looks down making sure Sharon is following the script she most likely wrote for her.

Bialeck Initiates and Instigates By Flirting and Flattering Cain

Bialeck begins by saying how she met Cain and how he sat next to her at the National Restaurant Association convention . She slips up by saying’ During the conversation” and then corrects her self by saying “ the convention “ rather. When someone stumbles like this it is usually a signal of deception. She is reading words which are not heartfelt and most likely not from her directly.

Then she relays she thought that Cain was an inspirational speaker. She said to him “When are you running for President?” As she relays this, she shakes her head “No “ and purses her lips and looks down which most likely means that she did not say that. So there is another signal of deception here.

If this occurred 14 years ago as she said, the thought of a Black man running for President was not even a consideration as it is now. So that means if it did happen she was merely flattering him, toying, and flirting with him becuase she knew quite well that during those days, a decade and a half ago, a considering a Black man for President was not a reality.

She then says he invited her and her boyfriend to attend an exclusive party and says she felt “honored to be included.” That means she didn’t deserve to be included and knew deep down she didn’t belong there, but felt grateful she could attend. Also the use of the word honored means that she allegedly held Cain in high esteem.

Fired From Her Organization, Allegedly Manipulates Head of Organization , Cain To Get Her Job Back

Then she said she was let go (FIRED) by the Foundation and was devastated. WHY was she let go? That is the burning question. She said she was devastated. Why was she devastated ?

She then puts blame on the organization by stating that she felt she was doing well in the short time she was there in terms of fundraising. Well maybe her definition of well and her bosses deinition of “doing well “well were two different things.

As she describes her personal story of being” let go” FIRED , there is a marked difference in her delivery. She is fluid and fluent and isn’t reading from the script. So it rings true she was indeed fired and that she was indeed upset by it.

Allegedly her “boyfriend” said for her to reach out to Cain, as she, he said Herman seems to think kindly of you. WHY would he think so kindly of her after sitting next to her at dinner for a few moments? Is it because she was flirting and flattering him to death. Most likely.! It’s called kissing up to the head of the organization- the boss.

She said she called Cain and he took her call and she told him she was let go and he said he was not aware if it. Don’t you think that if the head of the organization heard their employee was let go, they would want to know WHY that person was let go?

Don’t you think that after he found out what she allegedly did, he would want nothing to do with her? Cain was a political person back then, so why would he make waves in the politics of his own organization and re hire a fired person? It does not make sense. Also it is suspect to me to call someone for a job and just happen tell them the name of the hotel you are staying at.

SHE Instigated The Alleged Meeting- NOT Cain And Shows Many Signals of Deception.

SHE then explains since she was unemployed, her boyfriend booked a room for her at the capital Hilton. Isn’t that a bit piggy of her? If you are unemployed and have no money and someone else pays for you to stay at the most expensive hotel in DC, wouldn’t you let them know you couldn’t accept it because it was too pricey and

Relaying to the public that she took the room so freely sounds like she feels entitled to it and smacks of a “gimmie gimmie “gold digging” mentality

She asked where they should meet, another aggressive act. She relays he said they meet at the hotel lobby bar. This means that he was not having hanky panky or ulterior motives on his mind as he allegedly suggested an open public place.

When she discusses the suite that she was arranged by Cain she shows deception as she explains that she thought it was her boyfriend trying to surpsise her That is too much information and indicative of deception.

Body language wise she he looks down and lip purses, further indicating signals of deception.’

Being in the restaurant hotel business, herself, she could have finagled an upgrade all by herself. What would be the motivation of a man whom you met once upgrading you when he allegedly doesn’t know what you want or why you are coming to see him.

She says he took her to dinner and he promptly said WHY ARE YOU HERE? Isn’t that odd that someone would ask you why you are there when you yourself set up an appointment to meet them and they meet you for a drink? Also if HE asked why she was there, it indicates that he did not have any ulterior motive with her. He had no idea what she wanted from him.

Thus, we have seen yet another aggressive pattern by Bialeck. Did she finagle him to buy her a dinner saying how hungry she was? Did she flatter and flirt. Was she flattering and flirting so much at dinner that he had to say WHY ATRE YOU HERE ? Was he thinking, what in goodness sakes do you want from me? Are you a hooker or something?

If she wanted a job all she had to do was call his office, meet with him in his office and ask him for a job in his office. The operative word here is office .Done and completed! But her drink and dinner BS may have been leading him on to make him question her as to why she was really there.

HARRASSMENT SCENARIO MAKES NO SENSE AND SHOWS MANY SIGNALS OF DECEPTION

Then she says she asks him to help her get her old job back or get a job in a different department as she allegedly hits him up for a job.

So did he say, yes or no or maybe? The fact that she doesn’t relay what he said is suspect in itself.

She then reports he allegedly takes her in his car and drives her to the National Restaurant Association and sexually harasses her WHAT ??????????

If he allegedly upgraded her to a suite as she said earlier, don’t you think he would harass her in her upgraded suite he allegedly secured and NOT in a car.

She described what she wore and said he had a suit with his shirt open. WHAT??? What happened to his tie? And why was his shirt open? Did did she open it? Was she flattering and flirting and unbuttoning his shirt? This sounds like BS to me. If a man is interested in having sex with you, he di going to unbutton his PANTS not his SHIRT? And did he do this when he was driving her around DC when they were stopped at traffic lights ?

She does NOT say he parked in front of such and such building and attacked me. This is nonsense.

This most likely NEVER happened as she stutters on her words while she relates he had with his shirt with his shirt open ,, When people repeat significant words they are usually lying .

She looks down as she said he was going to show me around the offices . She touches her nose just like she did in the above photo when discussing the hotel drinks they most likely did NOT have. Look at Gloria flowing the script along with her client.

As Bialek describes what she wore , she interjected UM’s ( a huge signal of deception. As she said instead of going in the office he reached over and….. she SWALLOWS HARD- another huge signal of deception . As she says that he reached over and he put his hand on my leg , she has a shoulder shrug which screams LIE!

Also as she discusses how they met for a drink, she covers up her mouth as you can see in the photo. That is a signal of deception. Cain claims he never met the woman, let alone met her for a drink. Her tell certainly may indicate this.

Also her response to Cain’s allegedly putting her hand up his crotch sounds bogus.

She asks him “What are you Doing ? You know I have a boyfriend? WHAT???????? Does that mean if she didn’t have a boyfriend it would be fine to touch her crotch? Her response sounds very off. One would say STOP, DON’T , NO! One would not give the reason to not continue as to their having a boyfriend. It makes no sense .

She also showed no anger or upset as she relayed this moment and in essence relived it. That is another HUGE signal of deception.

She said she told her “boyfriend” and a mentor and that she was embarrassed. Of course she didn’t tell them the details because nothing probably happened because she told them nothing. If something sexually inappropriate really happened and your alleged boyfriend was the one who supposedly suggested you set up the meeting, don’t you think you would tell him everything? And who is this “boyfriend”?

Then she leaks out the above facial expression which is inconsistent with what she is saying. Her eyes needed to be open wide and eyebrows raised as she spoke of ‘surprise”. Instead she makes a closed off disgusted look with head cocked to the side which is another huge signal of deception. Also she minimizes what she says by saying “kind of normal”.

Bialeck Beams and Smiles At Her ALLEGED “Harasser” 14 Years Later?

Her face literally lights up whens he said she saw him again. She said in an upbeat voice as she said you remember me? He obviously didn’t remember her among the hundreds of thousands he has met over the past 14 years.

As she describes his speech, he says as he spoke he had the same infectious presence when she first heard him. She lights up and beams a huge smile as she says this. Here is a HUGE clue of deception in my book. When you have been sexually harassed by someone, he last thing you do is flatter them publically or even go to see them.

The last thing you would do is light up and beam a smile. Instead your brow would furrow and you would have a look of disgust and anger on your face. Bialeck had a beaming smile instead.

Does This Smack of A Political Agenda or Setup?

She said that when she asked if he remembered her, she wanted him to come clean for HIS SAKE ANDFORHIS CANDIDACY When someone is harassed they are not thinking of the other person’s sake or their candidacy. She also self corrects which is another signal of deception.

Then she gives some altrusitc BS by saying she is the face and voice behind women who are afraid to come forward voice. Puhleeeze!!!!!! Now I am convinced that this must have been written by by Gloria or her minions as the rhetoric sounds way too familiar. It sounds like what many of her other clients have all said in their pressers as she sttod breast to breast with them in front of the microphones.

When she starts her final statement with a political message of how America is in turmoil and what kind of leader we need, I am even more convinced someone put her up to this. If you are harassed you are not thinking about your country in turmoil. She also smiled as she said this. This is incongruent behavior with someone who was harassed.

In the above photo she scratches her face and looks down at significant points in the speech. This usually indicates deception.

She claims it happened 14 years ago . Why come out NOW when he is running for office? It is because she and those who most like likely wrote this speech want to smear up his candidacy.

Based on her body language, voice and speech tells this is NO shrinking violet. She seems like a strong willed aggressive woman who speaks her mind. She is no shrinking violet or some little victim.

On the contrary, she is a woman who LOVE, LOVES, LOVES the media attention!!! She was beaming on all the morning talk shows

In these above photos this look like a sexually harassed woman who was traumatized by what Cain did to her 14 years ago. To me she is the voice and face of someone who finally got her 15 minutes of fame or infamy. www.drlillianglass.com

Just before the verdict was read, the only thing which gave Conrad Murray’s emotions away as he awaited his fate, was his upper chest breathing. You could see the heaving of his chest and his heart no doubt beat double time.

However his facial expression belied the anxiety he was really experiencing. He wore the same mask like facial expression that he wore throughout the trial which I am certain did not further endear him to jurors.

As the word Guilty was read there was a slight movement however the facial expression did not change. He showed no emotion whatsoever.There was no forehead crinkling, no tears, no lip pursing or eye movement. There was nothing. He was void of emotion. But there was profuse sweating in his temple and upper forehead region.

He was also void of emotion as he was remanded into custody. He looked as though he was in a state of shock as he was cuffed and lead away. No doubt this was surreal for him.

When you see someone who shows absolutely no twinge of any emotion whatsoever, it is often a red flag for a suicide watch. The trial has obviously taken a physical toll on Murray as seen by the hollowed out appearance under his eyes and the puffiness in his midface. He may very well have been medicated during the trial as his eyes looked at half mast often and he appeared to be nodding out.

Oftentimes people do this when the information and truth is too much to handle emotionally. Thus it could be safely said that Conrad Murray appears to be the type of person who keeps his emotions in check and does not wear them openly.

But when the medication wears off and the reality sets in, emotions may take a tool on him and he may react self destructively in the form of a suicide attempt.

As he finally realizes all that goes along with his being a convicted felon in killing Michael Jackson, life may be too hard to handle. The public vitriol, the loss of his medical license, and financial troubles may force him into a state of hopelessness.

So being remanded into custody may be saving his life for the time being as he will no doubt be placed on a major suicide watch. But if he is intent on killing himself, his being a physician and knowing what to do to end his life may make suicide watch a futile process.

He appears to love his little child so that may give him some hope and may deter thoughts of his ending his life. If he thinks rationally and maintains his wits he will see that his 4 years may be cut in half and because of the prison overcrowding factor he may even get home confinement, according to TMZ.

Personally I believe that justice was served greatly and that it is a wakeup call to all physicians who put money and greed above the welfare of their patient. I have seen the starstruck physician who caters to the patient and does all that the patient wants . Even if Michael wanted propofol and insisted on it, he needed to have the integrity and ethics to say NO!

And if he said YES, he needed to stay by Michael’s side to make sure Michael was monitored. If Murray had to go to the bathroom, he needed to have a cup or a pail in the room as not to leave Michael alone. And if Michael had a weak system or had drug issues, he especially needed to be by his side to monitor him.

For the Jackson family, it is bittersweet. It is sweet that Justice was served and bitter that Michael is no longer alive. I know exactly how they feel. When my own precious brother was killed at the hands of an incompetent physician who intubated him wrongly so that he became a vegetable and died, it was sweet that we settled the medical malpractice case, but it is a bitter pill for me which I have to swallow for the rest fo my life that my Manny is no longer alive.

Just as Michael Jackson was an extraordinary person, so was my brother, he was funny and provided me with lots of belly laughs (something I have done little of since he was killed). He was warm, upbeat, kindhearted, really cared about people, highly intelligent, honest, and had a great deal of integrity. He was talented and creative and not just my brother, but my best friend. His death at the hands of an incompetent doctor is unbearable.

I am sure that is how the Jackson family feels about Michael. I had a vicarious thrill seeing Conrad Murray be cuffed and lead away. I wish that this would have happened ot the doctor who killed my brother . It didn’t . The cold hearted emotionless doctor who was only a doctor who seven months when he ended my brothers life is now back at the same hospital in New Jersey practicing as a bona fide physician. It galls me that this is the case. So it was a catharsis for me to see a physician get what was due to him. www.drlillianglass.com