At UTC 83, the Unicode
Technical Committee (UTC) rescinded their acceptance of four duplicate radical
characters that had been accepted for encoding at the following code positions:
U+FA4A, U+FA5E, U+FA5F, U+FA66. The UTC
took the action to rescind their acceptance because it had not seen the
characters before accepting them. Once
it became clear that these were duplicates of characters which were already
encoded, the UTC could no longer accept them into the standard.

The corresponding
duplicate characters are:

U+FA4A looks like U+2EA4

U+FA5E looks like U+2EC0

U+FA5F looks like U+2EBF

U+FA66 looks like U+2ECC

If there are reasons
why these four characters should be encoded even though they are duplicates,
then please provide that justification so that the UTC may consider it.