July 15, 2017

Am I the only one who sits back, digests all the political bull-twaddle from both sides, and has to laugh? No, I'm not laughing at any content. I'm laughing at the GOP, because they are getting sucked into reacting to horribly false narratives of the Left.

There are two main Leftoid narratives:

The Russia-Collusion narrative.

The ObamaCare Narrative.

Some might posit a third narrative, that of the #DumpTrump crowd, but that's a separate case, it's really a "soft" Coup D'etat in progress, so it shouldn't be dealt with in a discussion of Left vs. Right politics, because that's NOT politics, that's revolution.

Back to the first two narratives.

Case One: The left brought this one because they didn't have much else at the time (Case Two came up well afterward). Somehow, the Asses believed that they could make this drag on into the 2018 By-Election campaign, and win votes with it. Problem is, the beauty of their Case One isn't even skin-deep. There is NOTHING to the entire narrative, except if you flip it upside-down: there was plenty of collusion between the Democrats and Russia, going back to the famous Hillary "Reset Button", then the open-mike comments of POTUS44 saying to Medvedev "I will have more flexibility after the election", meaning better under-table USA-Russia dealings were just around the corner. Then came the Uranium One deal which gave away mining rights to the Russians for 20% of US uranium reserves. The then-Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid was mixed up in that one, and I will bet my bottom dollar he wasn't the only high-ranking Ass who was. HRC brokered the deal with him. So, no, aside from maybe minor business contacts of the Trump Incorporated conglomerate (such as the silly "honeypot" fiasco being Ass-trumpeted now), the GOP has little regard to Russia, the Asses, plenty, so this entire narrative is based on a Big Lie. For those who didn't take the three-term political science course Argumentation, Discussion and Debate (undergrad at sophomore level when I took it), the Big Lie technique simply says that propagandists should always consider telling such lies, because if repeated often enough, people WILL believe them. The Asses are nothing if not propagandists.

In sum, the Russia-Collusion Narrative is a series of Big Lies, nothing more. The simple technique of always challenging the First Premise breaks Case One down immediately.

Case Two: The ObamaCare Narrative. The ObamaCare Narrative is based on two circumstances: first, it is the "signature achievement" of POTUS44, and second, there is even less to it than the Russia-Collusion Narrative. ObamaCare, as a system of managing the delivery of and payment for health-care services, is an unmitigated disaster. It has collapsed, and it's touted "cooperatives" have mostly folded, and the ones still claiming operational status are fiscal disasters close to collapse. This hasn't stopped the Asses from erecting a wall of political energy to stymie all GOP attempts to end the disaster, though. The wall holds because of GOP perfidy: the GOPes ran on "REPEAL and REPLACE", got themselves elected, and seven months into their hegemony, have totally failed to either repeal or replace. The Asses pulled an old turd of a lie out of their butt (not a "big" lie, it failed making that stature) that the Mean Old GOP wants to end Medicaid, a "safety-net" for the po'-folks. When the Asses built the mega-disaster that is ObamaCare, they made sure to TRY to tie Medicaid to it, but in fact, it is easily sever-able. All the GOPes have to do is write a stand-alone Bill to remove Medicaid from ObamaCare, and it's done. The GOPes won't do that, of course.

So, there it is: The Left's failed, illogical program in two cases, and the Right's failed program to end the Left's narrative.

This one is so simple, most grade-schoolers can figure it out. To end the Left's Case One, the Right just stops talking about it. Just stop. Cold. Full stop. The Right's attempt to bring the truth depends on people seeing the truth, and the Asses AND their followers can't do that. Just let the Left whine. To end Case Two, a choice of two paths are available: Defund ObamaCare as much as possible, but stop talking about REPEAL. The GOPe is full of #UNIPARTY filk who tend to swallow the Left's lies (along with the Left's campaign contributions), so repeal will never get the votes. Just defund Obamacare and let it die. When NO insurance cooperative is selling any policies at ANY price, it's dead and We the People will demand that it be officially buried. When that demand finally comes, it will have to be heeded. Then REPEAL will happen, not before.

October 29, 2012

When I wake up from dreams, sometimes the dream is mostly forgotton even before I look at the clock to see what time of the night it is.

Sometimes, I remember every detail.

Last night, I had an "every detail remembered" dream. I awoke from it at 0334.

The dream's starting details went like this: In the future, but not far, as most of the details were current. Probably next Spring, since the weather was warm again. Obama had won his Second Term, and I was on the run. I have no idea of WHY I was on the run, but I had a memory, in the dream, of just how I did it: External events had crossed a bright line (unknown which events), and I had loaded light SHTF gear out, and was on the run. I had evidently ditched my personal vehicle and bought a beater to replace it. I had visited a few people I knew, and asked them not to report my visit even if it meant being in conflict with the authorities, which were decidedly hostile. In the background of this dream, it seemed to have been something I had written on this blog which generated a friendly visit from a local cop, who was friendly enough to tell me that the Eff Bee Eye had asked the locals to stop by and have a chat with me. I had told the cop I had nothing to talk about that concerned either his PD or the Eff Bee Eye, he had left without incident, and I was out of the house 5 minutes later. I drove by a pre-determined route to a perdetermined location at a friend's house, from where I used a landline phone to arrange the purchase of a car off of Craigslist, then that friend drove me over to pick it up. I was driving the new undercover ride to meet aanother friend who I had been told was also on the run when I woke up from the dream. It seemed that like-minded folks were all on the run.

What reality! The car was a dark red late-90's Nissan Altima, and it had been a Washington car for the illegal alien who had owned it, and still had the Washington plates in the trunk in addition to it's Oregon plates. My gear consisted of a couple changes of work clothing (Carhartts) and my work boots. I had a couple days food, my Vorgrimmler battle rifle which now sported an original scope (I don't have one of those right yet), and a Glock pistol, and I had a sleeping bag. Nothing in the dream indicated any further plans.

So, what do I take from that dream? I take that there was some sort of crackdown on political dissent in Obama's second term. I take that I should equip my Vorgrimmler rifle with one of it's original scopes (those were made by Zeiss, and are hard to find). I take that I had evidently thought enough of the danger to myself from the gummint to make plans to evade arrest, and those plans had worked for the short time I had put them into effect. I guess I should think about that sort of planning now.

At the point where I awoke, I suppose the dream could have taken almost any turn afterward, but the significant thing to take from it was that there was a definable threat to my freedom, I had recognized that threat, prepared for that threat, and had acted on that threat when it was revealed to be real.

December 20, 2011

The Army prosecutors appear to have the case against WikiLeaks snitch Pvt. Bradley Manning firmly in hand, and as a result of their evidence, seem to have solid evidence linking Manning and Julian Assange.

Why isn't Assange in the stockade, here or in Gitmo?

If we hand the Brits a proper extradition request for Assange, are they going to honor it?

Will Anonymous start to have organized fun and games with the DOD cyber-war folks if the Brits put the habeus grabbus on Assange?

My best guess: young-Un's "advisor", appointed by dead Papa, better have a decent will written...

Young-Un will be pre-occupied for a while discovering all of Papa's porn stashes and sampling the wares in Dead Dad's harem of whores, while his accountants try to round up all the available cash and get it under his control. After THAT, maybe time for some international intrigue, but hey, he's a kid, and hey, there's some strange poo-ying to bed, so I don't think we'll see much of him for a while.

October 31, 2011

...how to do it correctly, I guess they would be offended at just the mention of the word "right". This is a free offer to the OWS. No, I don't want to join OR lead your Movement, but it could become a valued stakeholder in our political process if it matures, so here's how to mature it.

OK, to analyze what this movement has done wrong so far:

They've tried to pull us all into their political web with the "1% vs 99%" ploy. Nice try, but it's bee-ess and they can't sell it. Out here in the real world, we're not moved.

They have decided to park their movement in town squares, etc, so as to be visible to town leaders and TeeVee cameras, I guess. Problem is in the details. They have created eyesores with their camps. Eyesores don't impress anyone except eye doctors.

The movement welcomes all, even some they should be rejecting, such as criminals and raving lunatics. Once again, drags the movement down.

They have decided, likely for reasons of ducking fiscal responsibility for damages caused by the movement, to not have visible leaders. They have spokesmouths instead. Bad idea. The camps are crying out for leadership, and there is none.

The "general assembly" way of deciding movement objectives, etc, has failed (like it's model, the United Nations). Sitting around for hours in a circle debating, with no time limits, and allowing deranged people to join in with dis-jointed rants to confuse the issues, doesn't substitute for leadership.

The adoption of marxism as the underlying flavor of the movement is wrong, wrong, wrong. Marxism is STILL an enemy, and most of we "99%-ers" still believe it is.

OK, then, R-dog, what have they done correctly so far? Glad you asked, because there IS grist here to feed into a political mill:

We HAVE been bent over the table by global corporate hegemony usurping both individual and government rights, and it's beginning to get nasty to the point that something, like this movement, had to arise to counter it. The right beef at the right time.

The super-rich DO lead lives of excess, and here in the USA, they tend to separate themselves from general society to a greater degree, making themselves into a separate class. That form of classism is morally repugnant to the rest of us, and needs to be countered with the doctrine of inclusion. Giving the movement the benefit of the doubt, I think that it would LIKE to project inclusion as a solution.

So, with the plusses and minues on the table, how do we coach this movement back to both sanity and effectiveness? The movement spokemouths are correct, the movement's NOT going away. It will be around in some form, probably for decades, so, despite this bad start, it needs a makeover, and should get one.

This pundit's advice for the movement, in order of necessity to implement:

Lose the "Flea Party" image. Lose it now! Declare the "occupation" a success and close the camps. Raise money to fix the damages and/or offer your people's strong backs to do the job.

Elect leaders. Real leaders, leading via a real Committee, out in the open, with real addresses and websites, not just Facebook and Twitter. The Earth First! and eco-terror tactics of "no visible leadership" has to go. We, the bulk of the "99%", want to see your leaders, listen to them, have a chance to respect what they have to say.

Lose the Marxist ideals. The "1%" is NOT going to sit still and turn over all their wealth for re-distribution, Communist-style. They have great power, and know how to use it to prevent such robbery. While you're at it, your new leaders should sit down with the two major political parties and offer your services to whichever of the parties can come up with the best and most workable plan for supporting the idea of de-fanging and de-clawing the corporate giants. The Democrats will, of course, court you immediately, but don't be surprised if the GOP sends a serious envoy bearing a nice offer as well.

Lose the anarchists you have allied yourselves with. You're not likely to succeed with the lukewarm support of the anarchists that you have now, and if that support were to get warmer, so will the opposition to it. Most of us in the "99%" don't like the anarchists, their methods or their nihilistic way of thinking, and it's us you have to impress, not the Black Hood Brigades.

Lose the crazies and the thugs. You have attracted, to every camp, a number of high-profile emotionally-disturbed individuals and criminals. Show them the door, however you must. Crazies can't be trusted to follow orders, but CAN be trusted to give you a very bad image. The local TeeVee stations, who should be showing inspiring sound bites from your bright and articulate leaders, are instead showing shots of ugly whackos and felons the po-po has culled out of your camps. You've had the good sense not to oppose the police in these arrests, so go the extra mile and ask the cops how you can keep them out of your outfit. They will have ideas for you to try.

You've timed it right, OWS-movement. The one thing you've done PERFECTLY so far is get your timing right. Build on that by adopting the above suggestions, and you will see your movement flourish.

Or, ignore this manual of proper operations, continue your bone-headed ways, and the movement will not rate a historical graffitti on a public lavatory wall.

January 18, 2008

The Rivrsis reads my blog. She is not on the political right and sometimes I have a hard time defining her position on things. Sometimes, however, her rants ring like a bell.

Take this rant, for instance, which she has agreed to let me post here:

"THE --- MEDIA --- ARE ---
*NOT*--- LIBERAL --- AFTER --- ALL *!!!!!*

Just because there are a
few "liberal" talking heads on TV doesn't make it liberal. The media are
full of mushy right-wingers like that Glenn Beck idiot, and
fake-reformed-bigot people like that Pat Robertson, and
the insulting-to-behold-on-TV puppets like Oliver North, and all the blonde
and official-ethnic bimbos on Fox, with their collagen-puffed lips
pouting right-wingish nasties in SUCH a Texas-sexy American way, like news
was a big beauty contest, really.

And get this fact thru your pate:
the media aren't anti-Christian, they are pro-conflict. Conflict and error
and malfeasance and violence sell much more ad time than polite discourse or
fair-mindedness. There's a conflict between the Huckabish folk who are busy
being busybodies into everyone's lives, plus making a helluva lot of money,
until the Rapture takes them up to heaven (or is it Heaven?), and the people
who foolishly think that having learned about the Constitution in school (if
they were so lucky), it actually obtains in the real world. Therefore, it's
a fit TV (and other media, podcasts, Dick Tracy wristwatches, iPhones, etc.)
topic, and can be prolonged indefinitely, as the 2 sides (and their various
grey-level hangers-on in the mid-zone) are stubbornly locked into their
beliefs in opposition to each other.

Hey, let's put some
snake-handlin' and bible-thumpin' in class and after school and before Friday
naht football, and by the flagpole, and under the hangin' tree. No, no,
don't do that, my boy might become a Hindu, or a Jew."

Fine rant, sis.

You can see the fambly resemblance here, no?

Now, if only my Dad were still alive and trusted these heah innarTubes, he would have outdone the both of us.