Now that I'm done impatiently waiting for my new phone, I can impatiently wait for my Stack Exchange Android App alpha testing invitation. Maybe I should have requested that while I was waiting for the phone...

lol, how childish that after a downvoted thread, someone went through my questions and downvoted even upvoted ones (of course without comments). I think meta is a kindergarden.

user200500

So, do you do medical research too? I vaguely remember a few of those abduction adduction terms from the PE course I got a D on, but it seems fairly involved for someone hired primarily for computer science expertise.

We do a lot of stuff @Asad. Really anything related to motion capture, motion tracking, 3D scanning, etc. Most of the demoed work is medical though. The other stuff is all still under an NDA unfortunately.

Again, please do not make benefits for other users' inconvenience. It has been explicitly asked politely. Ask the team to set up a test account for you. If it is important, they will do the favor for you, and especially not do this for otherwise well-edited posts to be able to make a dummy edit (and bump) afterwards.

@LaszloPapp if this really bothers you this much, and you think I'm overstepping boundaries here, by all means flag my for moderator attention and let them have a good look. As far as apologies go, I think I already said "Sorry about that one".

I wrote to the team already. I do not think it is fair, and I think they should make it clear not to do it, especially if users ask politely. They should provide test accounts, etc, if it is really that important. I personally fail to see why it was so important, but if the team considers so, they will help, I hope.

If one examines the privileges earned above 100 reputation, they are split into two camps:
Privileges that are dangerous in the hands of someone unfamiliar with the domain.
Privileges that are simply rewards for good participation. These include:
view close votes
established user (i.e. viewin...

@Bart: scores will not make you a great person. If you cannot stop downvoting people (even if it hurts them like me) for your fun, I personally think that is a problem. Covering such behavior by scores is also improper IMO.

A lot could be said @LaszloPapp. But luckily you don't at all have a habit of misrepresenting situations, nor of slathering anything with a sauce of poor interpretation. If you've notified the team, let that be it. They'll deal with it. And I'll see what happens on my end.

I'm curious.. would it be legal for a US company to write something like "because of COPPA you must be 13 to use this site. If you admit being younger than 13 we need to delete your account in case we ever find out about it" in their terms?

I am Juliet from New York.
I am stuck in a problem, and I am no electrical engineer. Can anyone please help me with the following question?
What is the total capacitance of capacitors connected in series, C1=1214F, C2=2121F ? Result must be INTEGER (without -F-)

@Bart I think they, like comm team members, can reveal non-PII information that is private. Like if a user is a sockpuppet, or the reasons behind a suspension. At least I've seen Comm doing that, not sure about the devs

@JohannesKuhn That works incredibly well. But many are showing only one 'creator', it doesn't show who approved the synonym request like it does on a suggested edit? Does that information get lost to the void?

@JohannesKuhn Time to try to figure out SQL again. That does work as it has the ApprovedByUserID field.

Ultimate goal is to figure out how many of the recent synonyms were actually voted by community folk, and how many were unilaterally implemented by mods. A quick glance says that mods are the ones creating virtually off of them