Having children shouldn't be basis for defining marriage

In an article in The Star March 26, "Indiana leading push to ban gay unions," Attorney General Greg Zoeller is quoted as writing, "Opposite-sex couples are the only procreative relationships that exist, which means that such couples are the only ones the government has a need to encourage."

What about infertile couples or opposite-sex couples who choose not to have children? Is Zoeller suggesting that we limit the benefits of marriage to those who provide children to the state?

Andy Pike

Indianapolis

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Email this article

Having children shouldn't be basis for defining marriage

In an article in The Star March 26, 'Indiana leading push to ban gay unions,' Attorney General Greg Zoeller is quoted as writing, 'Opposite-sex couples are the only procreative relationships that