On 14/01/2014 19:55, Ethan Furman wrote:
> This PEP goes a but further than PEP 460 does, and hopefully spells
> things out in enough detail so there is no confusion as to what is meant.
>> --
> ~Ethan~
Out of plain old curiosity do we have to consider PEP 292 string
templates in any way, shape or form, or regarding this debate have they
been safely booted into touch?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence