Transcription

2 Altruism Behavior that benefits others at some cost to oneself and that is motivated by the desire to benefit others

3 Some Ordinary Assumptions About Morality (1) People sometimes behave altruistically. (2) We sometimes have an obligation to behave altruistically.

4 Challenges to These Assumptions (PE) Psychological Egoism: All human actions are motivated (and can only be motivated) by selfish desires or self-interest. (EE) Ethical Egoism: We ought to pursue only our own self-interest.

5 Psychological vs. Ethical Egoism PE is a descriptive (non-normative) claim. EE is a prescriptive (normative) claim. But if ought implies can, then PE implies that no ethical theory other than EE can be true.

6 Gyges Ring (pp.497-8) Thought experiment: imagine a ring that could make its wearer invisible. Now suppose that a decent man and a bad man each get a hold of one of these rings. There s no question that the bad man will use the ring to commit crimes with impunity. Will the decent man do the same? (What does Glaucon say?) Should he do the same? (Glaucon s view?)

7 Two Versions of PE Weak PE (about valuing): The only thing we value (or can value) for its own sake is the satisfaction of our own interests. Strong PE (just about motivation): Our selfinterest is always at least a necessary part of the motive behind our actions; if it were absent, we wouldn t act. Which one is Feinberg concerned with?

8 Psychological Egoistic Hedonism (PEH) More specific version of PE Claims that all human actions are (& can only be) motivated by the desire for one s own pleasure Like PE, PEH has a strong and a weak form. Can you state each one? Feinberg considers two main arguments for PEH.

9 One Argument for PEH (P) We get pleasure from performing apparently unselfish acts. (C) Therefore our motivation for performing such acts is really the pleasure we receive from them.

10 Objections? Is the premise true? Feinberg doesn t think so. Can you come up with a counterexample? Even if the premise is true, does the conclusion necessarily follow? (I.e., is the argument valid?) Again, Feinberg thinks not. Why?

11 A Second Argument for PEH (P) The only way to teach people to do right and refrain from doing wrong is by rewarding them with pleasure and punishing with pain. (C) Therefore, the only motivation people have is to seek pleasure and avoid pain.

12 Assessing the Second Argument for PEH How does Feinberg reply to this argument? (See 482.) How strong is his reply? Can you think of other objections to the argument?

13 Three Arguments Against PEH (1) Lincoln Story (2) Hedonist Paradox (3) Two Meanings of Pleasure

14 Lincoln Story How does Lincoln explain his own motive for saving the pigs? Why does Feinberg think that Lincoln must be wrong? Thought experiment: what would Lincoln say if he were offered an amnesia pill? What does this suggest about strong PEH? What do you think he would say if we made him take a pleasure-erasing pill before saving the pigs? What does this suggest about weak PEH?

15 Hedonist Paradox (HP) HP: If you aim exclusively at pleasure itself pleasure will never come. An argument based on HP (P1) Suppose that we only desired our own pleasure. (PEH) (P2) If we only desired our own pleasure, we would never gain any pleasure. (HP) (P3) But we do gain pleasure. (C) Therefore, PEH cannot be true.

17 An Argument for PE (though not PEH specifically) (P) Every desire that a person has is that person s desire (i.e., it originates in himself). (C) Therefore, every desire that an agent has is a selfish desire.

18 Objections & Replies Objection #1: Conclusion doesn t follow from the premise. Just because a desire originates in me doesn t mean that it s a selfish desire (i.e., that the desire aims at my own benefit). PE s Reply: Conclusion does follow from the premise because what it means for my motives to be selfish is that those motives are mine; they originate in me. Objection #2: If so, then PE isn t an empirical claim. (What does this mean?) PE s Reply: PE isn t supposed to be an empirical claim. Objection #3: Then what s the use of it?

19 Rachels on Ethical Egoism I suggest we distinguish: Ethical Egoism: Each person ought to pursue his self-interest exclusively. Genuine altruism is irrational. Ethical Minimalism: It s always permissible to pursue one s own self-interest, but it s equally permissible, rational, and often good to be genuinely altruistic. (It s just not required; it s supererogatory.)

20 Three Arguments for EE (1) If everyone pursues her own self-interest, society will be better off. (2) Ayn Rand s argument: EE is the only philosophy that properly respects the value of the individual. (3) Ethical Egoism underlies commonsense morality. The reason a person is obligated not to lie, cheat, steal, etc. is that doing these things would be harmful to himself.

21 Argument (1) for EE (P) Everyone will be better off if we all just look out for ourselves. (C)Therefore, we should all just look out for ourselves. Questions: Is the premise true? Can you think of a counterexample? Is there a hidden premise here? What is it?

22 Argument (2) for EE Source: Ayn Rand. (See, e.g., Atlas Shrugged.) The argument: (P1) Our choice is between EE and the morality of sacrifice, which calls on us to sacrifice our own good for the good of others. (P2) The highest goal for humans is to perfect one s own abilities. (P3) The morality of sacrifice is incompatible with this goal. (C)Therefore, we should reject the morality of sacrifice and choose EE instead. Problems: False dichotomy: there are other alternatives than the two Rand describes. Straw man: no significant philosopher has ever endorsed what Rand calls the morality of sacrifice

23 Argument (3) for EE (P) To do what commonsense morality demands is always to do what is in your own best interest. (C) EE is therefore the source of our commonsense moral obligations. Possible objections: Premise does not hold true in all cases. Can you think of a situation in which it doesn t pay to do the right thing? Conclusion doesn t follow from the premise. Even if doing what commonsense morality demands always benefited us, it wouldn t follow that the reason it is right to do the what commonsense morality demands is that it is right to do what benefits us. Cf. the pleasure effect argument for PE.

25 Inconsistent Outcomes Argument Imagine that you and I are eating pizza. There s only one slice left and we re both still hungry. EE will say that you are obligated to take the last piece and prevent me from getting it. At the same time, according to EE, I am obligated to try to get the last piece and I should do what I can to prevent you from getting it. This may seem to be a problem for at least two reasons: (a) It may seem that by recommending inconsistent outcomes, EE fails to fulfill a necessary function of any moral theory-- namely, that it give us a way to resolve conflicts. (b)it may seem logically inconsistent to say that it is both right for me to try to get the piece of pizza and right for you to try to get the piece of pizza.

26 How the Egoist can reply: To (a): A moral theory need not provide a way of resolving conflicts. It is more like the Commissioner of Boxing than a courtroom judge. To (b): There s no logical inconsistency here. Again, this is easy to see if we think of the situation as akin to a competitive sports event or chess match, in which we believe all the contestants have a right to try to win. By the way, to say that it is right for both me and you to try to get the last piece of pizza is not the same as saying that it is both right and wrong for me to try to get the last piece of pizza. It is only right--not wrong.

27 No Relevant Differences Argument (P1) It is right to value the interests of some groups more than others only if there is some relevant factual difference between the members of the two groups. (P2) There is no relevant factual difference between oneself and others. (C) Therefore, contra EE, it is not right to value one s own interests more than others.

28 Assessing the NRD Argument Rachels thinks this argument comes closest to an outright refutation of Ethical Egoism. Question: Does the argument prove too much? Rachels seems to assume that the only morally relevant differences are intrinsic differences. But aren t there some groups of people (e.g., our family) whose interests we ought to value more than others, but who don t differ from us with respect to any intrinsic properties?

29 Paradox of Egoism (P1) EE says that we are always obligated to do what is in our best self-interest. (P2) It is in the the everyone s best interest to experience true friendship. (P3) True friendship requires genuine altruism--that is, caring about another s interests for their own sake. (C) Therefore, EE is paradoxical, because it tells us both that we should never behave altruistically and that we should sometimes behave altruistically. How might the Egoist reply to this argument?

30 Argument from Counterintuitive Consequences (P1) According to EE, I would be wrong to do anything that I have nothing to gain from, including making an effort to preserve the environment for future generations and saving all of Europe from destruction by pushing a button. (P2) But clearly there is nothing wrong with doing these things. (C ) Therefore, EE entails unacceptable consequences. How is the Egoist likely to respond to this? Even if this argument does pose a threat to Ethical Egoism, it doesn t threaten Ethical Minimalism.

31 The Difficulty of Answering the Egoist The challenge of Egoism amounts to the question, Why be moral? (This is the essence of Glaucon s challenge to Socrates in Republic II, and Plato spends the remainder of this famous dialogue trying to answer it.) To give an answer to this question that would satisfy the Egoist, we would need to explain how it is profitable to be moral. But, according to some philosophers, even if we could give such an explanation, it wouldn t convince the Egoist that he ought to be moral; it would only make him want to be moral. Thus, some philosophers think the question is simply wrongheaded. There is no further reason why we are morally obligated to do certain things, so it is pointless to ask for such a reason.

33 Background to Glaucon s Account: The Prisoner s Dilemma Scenario: You and your neighbor have been arrested, charged with a crime, and taken to separate rooms for questioning. (It doesn t really matter whether you re innocent or guilty, but assume you re both innocent.) You each have two options, and no way of knowing which option the other has chosen: you can either keep mum or betray your neighbor and say that he did it while maintaining that you re innocent. There are three possible outcomes: (1) one of you betrays while the other keeps mum; (2) both of you betray; (3) both of you keep mum. The result of (1) is that the betrayer goes free while the betrayed gets two years in prison. The result of (2) is that both of you get one year in prison. The result of (3) is that both of you will be given a $500 fine. These results are summarized in the following chart.

35 Assume the following preferences: 1: Go free 2: $500 fine 3: 1 year in prison 4: 2 years in prison Question: What is the purely self-interestedly rational thing for each of you to do? What will the result be if both of you choose this course of action? How could you both get a better result?

36 Now consider how a parallel situation might arise in a social context: suppose you and your neighbor are in a state of nature, and a situation arises where each of you will have the opportunity to take something valuable from the other. Assume the following preferences: 1: You take your neighbor s stuff and keep your own. 2: You both keep your own stuff. 3: You take your neighbor s stuff but lose your own. (Worse than 2 because violating others doesn t make up entirely for the injury of being violated oneself.) 4: You lose your own stuff and get nothing in return. The following chart summarizes the possibilities.

37 Your Neighbor You Refrain Take Refrain You: 2 Neighbor: 2 You: 4 Neighbor: 1 Take You: 1 Neighbor: 4 You: 3 Neighbor: 3 What is the rational thing for each of you to do? What will the outcome be if both of you choose this course of action? How could you improve on this outcome?

38 Glaucon s Account of the Origins of Morality According to Glaucon, justice (=morality) is a set of rules that people agree to follow in order to avoid the worst outcome--suffering injustice and not committing it. While being just allows us to move up the ladder of preferences, however, it does not get us the best outcome, which is to commit injustice without suffering it in return. On this account, what reason do we have to be just if we can get away with injustice?

39 Some Background to Nietzsche One of philosophy s greatest polemicists. Some recommended reading: Beyond Good and Evil, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Geneology of Morals Alleged association with Nazis: It s easy to see how any ambitious nationalistic movement might ve taken inspiration from N s writings, but there s nothing in N that supports the specific anti-semitic program of the Nazis. N on women: N s writings are notoriously misogynistic; it s probably safe to ignore everything N says about women.

40 Nietzsche s Project responding to a society that he thinks has become unanimous in all major moral judgments, which to his mind include an opposition to any special claims, special rights, or privileges, a mistrust of punitive justice, a hatred against suffering and exploitation basically, the fundamental principles of modern liberal democratic society and Judeo-Christian ethics. argues (1) that these attitudes and beliefs represent only one among many possible forms of morality, and (2) that they represent an unhealthy, degenerate form of morality. attempts to make both these points by giving a geneology of morals that is, by unearthing the historical origins of modern morality. finds that there has been a value inversion at some point in history calls for a revaluation of values.

41 Master Morality vs. Slave Morality originates in the dominant class i.e., the elite, the aristocracy based on an opposition between good and bad, where good = noble and arises out of admiration for the excellence of the elite, and bad = despicable and designates those who are mediocre and weak in contrast to the elite values pride, hardness, devotion to one s own friends and family; disdains selflessness, pity, impartiality originates in the oppressed class, the herd based on an opposition between good and evil, where the idea of evil arises out of resentment and fear of the elite, and attaches to those qualities that are regarded as good by the master morality. (This is the inversion of values that N talks about.) Good, meanwhile, designates those qualities that are useful in alleviating the pain of the herd s existence. values pity, humility, freedom; condemns suffering, inequality, exploitation

42 Conclusions Is there an argument in all this? If so, what might it look like? Questions to consider: Is there some form of egalitarian society in which great men and great achievements can be realized? Is the kind of exploitation and power disparities that Nietzsche celebrates really necessary for excellence and achievement? Can there be flourishing without exploitation?

Egoism For the last two classes, we have been discussing the question of whether any actions are really objectively right or wrong, independently of the standards of any person or group, and whether any

QUIZ 1 ETHICAL ISSUES IN MEDIA, BUSINESS AND SOCIETY WHAT IS ETHICS? Business ethics deals with values, facts, and arguments. Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be

Normative Ethical Theories I. Normative Ethics A Normative Ethical Theory is a philosophical theory about the fundamental principles of morality. A fundamental principle of morality is a moral obligation

Socratic and Platonic Ethics G. J. Mattey Winter, 2017 / Philosophy 1 Ethics and Political Philosophy The first part of the course is a brief survey of important texts in the history of ethics and political

Chapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. Consequentialism a. is best represented by Ross's theory of ethics. b. states that sometimes the consequences of our actions can be morally relevant.

Utilitarianism 1. What is Utilitarianism?: This is the theory of morality which says that the right action is always the one that best promotes the total amount of happiness in the world. Utilitarianism

The Ring of Gyges Plato Plato [ 428 348 (or 347)], considered by many to be the greatest philosopher who ever lived, is the author of The Republic and other great dialogues. Plato s influence on Western

Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,

The Challenge of Ethics Beyond Applied Ethics... Applied ethics is popular because it is easy to see the application Applied ethics is unpopular because it is difficult to make progress those who are cynical

Divine command theory Today we will be discussing divine command theory. But first I will give a (very) brief overview of the discipline of philosophy. Why do this? One of the functions of an introductory

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? - My boss - The shareholders - Other stakeholders - Basic principles about conduct and its impacts - What is good for me - What

Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons Some Possibly Helpful Terminology Normative moral theories can be categorized according to whether the theory is primarily focused on judgments of value or judgments

Suppose.... Kant You are a good swimmer and one day at the beach you notice someone who is drowning offshore. Consider the following three scenarios. Which one would Kant says exhibits a good will? Even

Welcome to your life! Now What? The Question: How should I live? Free at Last! You re adults! Cool, huh? You no longer have to do what others tell you to do. What Now? Your parents Your teachers Your religion

13 Plato s Defense of Justice in the Republic Rachel G. K. Singpurwalla We have a strong intuition that considerations of moral rightness or justice play a central role in the good life an intuition, that

Definition of ethical egoism: People ought to do what is in their own self-interest. Normative agent-focused ethic based on self-interest as opposed to altruism; ethical theory that matches the moral agents

Michael Lacewing Prescriptivism Theories of what morality is fall into two broad families cognitivism and noncognitivism. The distinction is now understood by philosophers to depend on whether one thinks

Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. A structured set of principles that defines what is moral is referred to as: a. a norm system b. an ethical system c. a morality guide d. a principled

Chapter 2 Ethical Concepts and Ethical Theories: Establishing and Justifying a Moral System Ethics and Morality Ethics: greek ethos, study of morality What is Morality? Morality: system of rules for guiding

In Defense of The Wide-Scope Instrumental Principle Simon Rippon Suppose that people always have reason to take the means to the ends that they intend. 1 Then it would appear that people s intentions to

THREE CHALLENGES TO JAMESIAN ETHICS SCOTT F. AIKIN AND ROBERT B. TALISSE Classical pragmatism is committed to the thought that philosophy must be relevant to ordinary life. This commitment is frequently

Ethical Egoism Quiz: one sentence each beginning with The claim that 1) What is ethical 2) What is psychological Ethical Egoism Things You Should Know How are ethical egoism and ethical relativism each

Chapter 12: Areas of knowledge Ethics (p. 363) Moral reasoning (p. 364) Value-judgements Some people argue that moral values are just reflections of personal taste. For example, I don t like spinach is

So far (from class and course pack) Moral dilemmas: e.g., euthanasia (class), Churchill decision in World War 2 Ethics ultimately concerned with how to live well. One part of that involves choice of actions

16RC1 Cahana Medical professionalism: Where does it come from? A review of different moral theories Alex Cahana Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department Bioethics & Humanities University

TEACHER S NOTES INTRO Each student has to choose one of the following topics. The other students have to ask questions on that topic. During the discussion, the student has to lie once. The other students

The Life Most Worth Living: Virtue Theory in ancient and modern perspective Bill Rhodes, PhD Mitigating Operator-Induced Vehicle Mishaps Professional Education, Moral Neurophysiology, and Results-Based

How should I live? I should do whatever brings about the most pleasure (or, at least, the most good) Suppose that some actions are right, and some are wrong. What s the difference between them? What makes

Autonomous Machines Are Ethical John Hooker Carnegie Mellon University INFORMS 2017 1 Thesis Concepts of deontological ethics are ready-made for the age of AI. Philosophical concept of autonomy applies

Ethics and Morality Ethos (Greek) and Mores (Latin) are terms having to do with custom, habit, and behavior. Ethics is the study of morality. This definition raises two questions: (a) What is morality?

1 -- did you get a message welcoming you to the coursemail reflector? If not, please correct what s needed. 2 -- don t use secondary material from the web, as its quality is variable; cf. Wikipedia. Check

Chapter 2--How Should One Live? Student: 1. If we studied the kinds of moral values people actually hold, we would be engaging in a study of ethics. A. normative B. descriptive C. normative and a descriptive

IS ACT-UTILITARIANISM SELF-DEFEATING? Peter Singer Introduction, H. Gene Blocker UTILITARIANISM IS THE ethical theory that we ought to do what promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of

How to Live a More Authentic Life in Both Markets and Morals Mark D. White College of Staten Island, City University of New York William Irwin s The Free Market Existentialist 1 serves to correct popular

Satsang with Swami Dayananda Saraswati Arsha Vidya Gurukulam Life 1 Question What is the meaning of Life? Answer If we take the word meaning to be goal, the meaning of life certainly cannot be death. If

Moral Philosophy : Utilitarianism Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory that was developed by Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). It is a teleological or consequentialist

CS305 Topic Introduction to Ethics Sources: Baase: A Gift of Fire and Quinn: Ethics for the Information Age CS305-Spring 2010 Ethics 1 What is Ethics? A branch of philosophy that studies priciples relating

Wisdom First published Mon Jan 8, 2007 LODGE VEGAS # 32 ON EDUCATION The word philosophy means love of wisdom. What is wisdom? What is this thing that philosophers love? Some of the systematic philosophers

The Goodness Ethic Copyright 2010 William Meacham, Ph. D. Permission to reproduce is granted provided the work is reproduced in its entirety, including this notice. Contact the author at http://www.bmeacham.com.

24.231 Ethics Handout 19 Bernard Williams, The Idea of Equality A descriptive claim: All men are equal. A normative conclusion: Therefore we should treat men as equals. I. What should we make of the descriptive

CLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 REASONS 1 Practical Reasons We are the animals that can understand and respond to reasons. Facts give us reasons when they count in favour of our having some belief

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers Diagram and evaluate each of the following arguments. Arguments with Definitional Premises Altruism. Altruism is the practice of doing something solely because

Mill s Utilitarianism I. Introduction Recall that there are four questions one might ask an ethical theory to answer: a) Which acts are right and which are wrong? Which acts ought we to perform (understanding

PHL271 Handout 2: Hobbes on Law and Political Authority 1 Background: Legal Positivism Many philosophers of law treat Hobbes as the grandfather of legal positivism. Legal Positivism (Rough Version): whether

Ethical Egoism Ethics Unit 5 The primacy of Self Interest in the Western tradition A. The individual exists prior to society - society does not construct the individual Hobbes Hereby it is manifest that

EUTHYPHRO (lecture) Background: Socrates, in his famous ironic conversations portrays himself to be ignorant of all ideas and thoughts of philosophic inquiry. He often implores the experts in their particular

MILL The principle of utility determines the rightness of acts (or rules of action?) by their effect on the total happiness. Mill s principle of utility [A]ctions are right in proportion as they tend to

Psychological Egoism A Popular Mistake Self-interest and Virtue The virtues are lost in self-interest as rivers are lost in the sea. Franklin D. Roosevelt Two Kinds of Egoism Psychological Egoism (PE):