Children to be taught 'heterosexuality not the norm' in Australian schools project

He only deflected and doesn't dare to damage his "ATS reputation" further by touching the pregnancy stage part of your posts.

One thing is plain - spermatozoids both in absolute counts and more complete studies included quality as in speed of motion, have gone down in many
countries over the past decades, that is undebunkable.

and doesn't dare to damage his "ATS reputation" further by touching the pregnancy stage part of your posts.

Yes, this is correct.

One thing is plain - spermatozoids both in absolute counts and more complete studies included quality as in speed of motion, have gone down in
many countries over the past decades, that is undebunkable.

Same with the brain scans of Males, Females, and homosexual males and females.

Pointing out that being homosexual is not normal or natural does not make one intolerant.

The policy planned for the schools is to teach both are equal, that homsexuality is normal.

I disagree with this.

I am not homophobic, I just know that children experiencing puberty are already confused and perhaps it is better to let the children make their own
minds up based on what society is. A program in a school is not going to alter tolerance levels, bullies will be bullies.

Sorry for thinking critically!

I am not anti-verbist, I just know that children experiencing learning to read are already confused and perhaps it is better to let the children make
up their own minds about words based upon what society is. A program in school is not going to alter literacy levels, idiots will be idiots.

Yeah. Sounds stupid, right? If you think about this critically - the way you're claiming to, you're basically saying that schools shouldn't be
teaching kids things, because the last thing someone confused needs is to be taught things.

You know what? When I'm confused, I find that knowledge and education actually improves that state of confusion. Also, I don't really remember
puberty as being all that confusing, because (a) I had an adequate level of sex ed, and (b) nobody around me spouting religious nonsense about what
is, or is not, "normal"

The simple facts, if you look at it critically, are that understanding and tolerance do lead to less bullying. Information leads to less confusion. So
for those of you lacking information, here's some.

Around 8-11% of the population self-identifies as LGBT (as in, they say that they are on a survey. Obviously this doesn't count people too scared or
embarrassed to come out in a survey)

Red hair occurs naturally in about 2% of the population. That means there are five times as many people in the world that are not heterosexual, than
have red hair. Should we be teaching children that red haired people are the children of the devil who choose to be evil? Yes, again, a ridiculous
comparison, but the point here is that just because the nature of something is different, does not mean it is not natural. Just because it is rare
(although really, 1 in 10 isn't rare at all) does not mean that it is not natural.

Something like 60% reduction. Education, given to teens, improves their behaviors despite confusion, by lessening confusion and giving them
information that is broad and comprehensive, rather than restrictive and ideology based. In a school of a thousand children, around a hundred of them
will be LGBT. Whether you give them education or not, this is a fact, this will happen. Even if all education does is teach those 100 children that
they are normal, that this is ok, that they are not freaks or perverts or pedophiles or abnormal, (all of which I have heard homosexuals be called),
that means that there are a 100 more healthy kids with healthier self esteem. If you coincidentally manage to make fewer of the other 900 kids be
homophobic bullies, this is a huge net gain. Fewer teen suicides, through education. The abstinence/sex ed figures compared with pregnancies clearly
show that education, non-biased, comprehensive education, works.

So let's all think critically, and consider that teaching kids that they are all equal and normal regardless of their sexual orientation, is a good
thing. Just like teaching them to read is, we are giving them tools to make sense of the world, and lessen the confusion.

Homosexuality is not normal
the existence of what you perceive to be sentient life on this planet relies on the unification of the male and female energies.
To go against it is to ensnare the population in sickness, mentally and physically.
Even if genetic dissposition leaves one inclined toward the same gender sex is most often a choice
and lest it be deadly the races present on this planet can aqquire a taste or liking for anything

No, I read some parts of the program and it is clearly saying sexual diversity is to be accepted.

It is telling children that sexuality does not matter, that all are equal.

Yes...people are supposed to be equal, just like blacks and whites. Mostly because race or sexual orientation isn't a choice, so it makes sense to
promote equal rights and going up against homophobia makes perfect sense.

So your point is??? Are you against equal rights?

"HETEROSEXISM FEEDS HOMOPHOBIA".

I'm sorry but that mantra is BS.

Hetrosexuality IS the norm, that is what nature intended it to be.

Homosexuality should not be taught in schools to be equal to hetrosexuality, especially when the people being educating are experiencing puberty!

What the hell?!?!!

But in the long run is it possible that this new programme could be something to do with the NWO plan for global population reduction?

I think it's ok to teach children we shouldn't discriminate against others but to teach them that being heterosexual isn't the norm is wrong. It is
the norm if the majority of people are. That's what being " the norm" means! If they think its normal to play daddy and daddy or mommy and mommy,
go ahead but do not push your ways onto our children thank you very much.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.