What's the signifance of that story, TD? I mean, we know you get all obsessive over GTMO and torture and all that sort of sh*t... but... I mean, surely these other things are important stories, right? Especially Arlen "All-is-forgiven-now" Specter, right?

Ummm... wrong. The only thing that Specter's self-interested switch (he was going to lose a GOP primary to former Rep. Pat Toomey... Arlen is a man whose allegiance is ruled by expedience) accomplishes is to remove any cover the President might have had if his agenda proves unsuccessful or unpopular: although 51 senators is usually considered a majority, with Harry Reid in the unfortunate (for the rest of us) position of Majority Leader, 60 seemed to be needed... so Arlen obliges and takes us there (assuming Al Franken ever manages to get himself sworn in... )

That said, the President seemed to have no major problems passing the major signature programs he wanted with Specter in the ranks of the GOP: deficit spending as far as the eye can see to cover (apparently) bold initiatives in education, health care, energy research and other cool sh*t that we liberals are supposed to kvell over, with a slight nod to progressive taxation... except, of course, that on closer review, the initiatives aren't so bold (except for the spending part). Since he could already pass those things with Specter's assistance whether Specter called himself a Republican or a Democrat or a Klingon... nothing has really changed that much, frankly, save the label (and possibly, eventually, the committee chairmanships... Arlen's pretty damned senior in the Senate). Sorry, Arlen... but the guy who complained that the Military Commissions Act was setting the clock back 800 years and then voted for it anyway... is just not an o.k. guy in my book. While I've gone down to Pennsylvania on Election Day the last two federal election cycles to assist Democratic candidates, I'm not sure I can go in good conscience to support you, Arlen. Sorry. I just don't see this as all that "big" a story, though it certainly seemed explosive and shocking when I first read about it.

No, no. What DOES matter is the quiet judicial revolution to restore the Constitution that seems to be breaking out all over the place (except for the D.C. Circuit) with today's development in the West Coast's Ninth Circuit (home of Judge Jay "Bugs" Bybee)... pretty big. In this case, the Obama Administration has made it clear that it intends to protect the torturers even from disclosure, let alone from actual accountability: the Ninth Circuit's "in your face" will doubtless force the Obama Administration to rethink whether it wants to risk a Supreme Court repudiation of its adoption of a Bush-era policy... or whether it wants to do what it was elected to do and what the President took an oath to do: uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic (and the current Republican party leadership would have to be considered strong enemies of the Constitution right about now, and John McCain, I'm looking right at you, a**hole.)

So there. A huge day for our Constitution... though, as this comes from a lower court... we'll just have to stick around and see if this sticks.

Comments

Arlen Spector. I submit three words: "Single Bullet theory". This guy will say or do literally anything to stay on the public teat! This latest, desperate "I me mine" act barely lights up the "Chutzpa" meter compared to his Warren commission activities.

Just as a Warren Commission point:
There was a quite well done special (Sci Channel or something like that), which seemed well researched and unbiased on the Kennedy assassination. It used little known (or, perhaps made up) facts like Connally was in a special low slung pivoting chair. They used ballistic gel filled with bones to simulate the victims, an identically fitted car and a British sniper on a suspended platform with an identical rifle. Due to certain constraints, I believe they only had one go at it. Anyway, the sniper got three hits and hit a few bones on the way thru. One bullet took a trajectory like the magic bullet. And the same amount of damage. Apparently one oft overlooked fact is that the other side of the MB is pretty mangled. The special seat for the gov explains the apparently magical physics of the bullet.
I don't know either way. I do think the govt is entirely capable (morally) of performing such actions, but I just don't know. Too much of the other evidence just doesn't add up. And just because a single sniper could have done it has nothing to do with the rest of the story. In fact, pinning the entire idea that one event can decide the truthiness any plot is itself suspicious. I, personally, haven't seen any of the other "coincidences" of the day explained away. To me, Harvey's complete composure while talking to reporters in what must be, guilty or not, harrowing circumstances is bizarre

Posted by E Pleb Neesta at April 29, 2009 11:46 AM

Yes, this is Change we can believe in. Speaking of which, Neal Kashkari, the man in charge of the bailout and recovery plan, is stepping down on Friday. Fortunately, the administration just got the MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner back from the cleaners.