A Totalitarian Future for Europe?

I don’t often agree with the statist president of the European Commission, but Mr. Barroso may be right when he warns that some nations are at risk of descending back into dictatorship. But while he may be correct in his diagnosis, his proposed solution is more of the policies – redistribution, handounts, bailouts, and subsidies – that have caused nations to get in trouble in the first place. At best, this approach postpones the day of reckoning – but it also causes a much bigger collapse.

During my recent visits to Europe, I was surprised by the level of pessimism from all segments of the population. The general assessment is that Europe is heading downhill and that there is little hope of changing direction because too many people have been convinced by politicians that they are entitled to mooch. But, as Margaret Thatcher famously warned, the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money. That is what is happening in Europe. But rather than sober up, the Greeks and others are rioting in hopes of finding new victims to consume. Many people I talked to expressed concern that this attitude eventually would cause economic collapse and lead to some sort of anti-democratic rule. The optimists (if you can call them that) think the result may be some sort of soft despotism dictated by Brussels and enforced by bribes from (mostly) German taxpayers. Others are more dour and fear the rise of more malignant forms of dictatorship.

Democracy could ‘collapse’ in Greece, Spain and Portugal unless urgent action is taken to tackle the debt crisis, the head of the European Commission has warned. In an extraordinary briefing to trade union chiefs last week, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso set out an ‘apocalyptic’ vision in which crisis-hit countries in southern Europe could fall victim to military coups or popular uprisings as interest rates soar and public services collapse because their governments run out of money. The stark warning came as it emerged that EU chiefs have begun work on an emergency bailout package for Spain which is likely to run into hundreds of billions of pounds. …Leaders are expected to thrash out a rescue package for Spain’s teetering economy. Spain is expected to ask for an initial guarantee of at least £100 billion, although this figure could rise sharply if the crisis deepens. News of the behind-the-scenes scramble in Brussels spells bad news for the British economy as many of our major banks have loaned Spain vast sums of money in recent years. Germany’s authoritative Frankfurter Allgemeine Newspaper reported that Spain is poised to ask for multi-billion pound credits. Mr Barroso and Jean-Claude Trichet of the European Central Bank are united on the need for a rescue plan. The looming bankruptcy of Spain, one of the foremost economies in Europe, poses far more of a threat to European unity and the euro project than Greece. Greece contributes 2.5 percent of GDP to Europe, Spain nearly 12 percent.

[…] conditions continue to unravel, and I think that could happen. But, as I’ve explained before, Europe’s future is somewhat bleak because of the policies supported by Barroso and his fellow …. Rate this:Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike […]

When a group of independent moocher nations decides to unify (EU) you inevitably move from intra-national mooching to inter-national mooching.

The “economic contagion threat” idea is trendily circulating in Europe these days. But it is the cultural contagion that is most threatening, the contagion of mooching. As Northern European voters see more and more Southern Europeans living at the expense of others, they will inevitably start crying “me too!”.

Unfortunately Europe will not hit bottom fast enough to give America enough of a lesson about where Stars and Stripes is headed.

Let me say the unthinkable: Is it necessarily a bad thing to for a temporary cessation of democracy?

The Roman Republic lasted roughly 500 years. One nifty feature was the idea of the dictator. When things get bad they’d appoint a someone with limitless powers for a defined term (originally 6 months, later extended to a year) to take care of the problems.

The appointment of a dictator happened a few times, usually during times of war. He could do what was needed without worrying about the next election. There was also the rule that anybody had the freedom, indeed the duty, to kill the dictator who overstayed his time in office without worry of prosecution.

Everybody knows what needs to be done in Europe: Eliminate half the government jobs, slash state spending, loosen labor markets. But the political will isn’t there to make it happen. A week of strikes by various unions tend to put abrupt halts to such dalliances.

I think the office of the dictator was a safety valve for the Romans, something that could get them back on track when things started falling apart. However we’re too civilized for that now. I wonder what our safety valve will be.