vendredi 14 juin 2013

When Obama, on video,
said he was opposed to spying on “innocent Americans” he was referring
specifically to spying on Muslims and when he said he’d provide tools to
catch terrorists he was referring to Americans who oppose him.

The White House assures that tracking our
every phone call and keystroke is to stop terrorists, and yet it won’t
snoop in mosques, where the terrorists are.

That’s right, the government’s sweeping
surveillance of our most private communications excludes the jihad
factories where homegrown terrorists are radicalized.

Since October 2011, mosques have been
off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover string
operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at
the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.

Who makes up this body, and how do they
decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and
staff are kept secret.

We do know the panel was set up under
pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at
mosques. Just months before the panel’s formation, the Council on
American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for
allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring
an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.

Before mosques were excluded from the
otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI
launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown
jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the
homeland.

The stings only stop FBI supervised plots. They don’t stop Ft.
Hood or the Arkansas jihad and aren’t likely to stop future acts of
jihad Muslims will wage on Americans.

If our leaders really wanted to prevent
“another 9/11,” they would have long ago admitted the obvious: that the
world of Islam, from its terrorists to its kings, is engaged in the
latest historical cycle of jihad to extend the reach of Islamic law
(Shariah). They would have decided that “profiling” isn’t worse than
terrorism.

They would have halted Islamic immigration not only to stop
more jihad cells from forming but also to prevent
Constitution-endangering, pro-Shariah demographics from forming, too.
They would have sharply curtailed travel, and particularly return travel
from jihad nations such as Chechnya and Pakistan.

They would have long
ago blocked U.S. institutions, including colleges, media organizations
and banks, from accepting millions of dollars from Shariah-ruled
dictatorships. They would have closed down mosques in America where
jihad is preached and supported.

Above all, they would have secured our
borders rather than leave them open all these post-9/11 years.

Of
course, that would mean re-establishing and defending those borders,
both literally and figuratively.

That’s one thing Washington, D.C., will never tolerate.

Spying on Americans, that’s an all too tolerable story in DC.ùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùùù