He insisted he made the right move when he decided to go for a winning field goal on a second down in overtime at Minnesota on Sunday even if the decision did not pan out.

Trestman called on Robbie Gould for a 47-yarder that sailed wide right rather than run another play or two, and the Bears suffered a crushing 23-20 loss. Trestman acknowledged he second guesses himself “a lot afterward.”

“I want to be perfect for the guys,” he said. “And when things don’t work, I hold myself accountable for it because I’m making every decision in the best interest.”

He was adamant: Going for the field goal was the right call at that moment, that the decision did not fuel any second guessing in his mind.

“It does not. It really does not,” he said.

The Bears are in a tough spot trailing Detroit by a game in the NFC North at 6-6, with the Lions holding a head-to-head sweep and their shot at a wild card looking about as long as the 66-yard attempt Gould missed at the end of regulation.

They’ve dropped six of nine, with a Monday night matchup against Dallas up next, and it’s not clear if the injured Jay Cutler (high left ankle sprain) and Lance Briggs (shoulder) will return.

Trestman did not rule out either player but would not say if they will practice on Thursday. Cutler hopes to return against the Cowboys but was noncommittal during his weekly appearance on Chicago’s WMVP-AM 1000.

On Monday, the big topic of discussion was the decision to turn to Gould rather than try to shorten the distance.

The Bears were moving the ball after Minnesota’s Blair Walsh had a 39-yard field goal wiped out by a holding penalty and missed a 57-yarder.

Chicago took over at its 47. Matt Forte ran for 24 yards over the next five plays to put the ball on the 29, and that’s where Trestman decided it was time to end this thing.

So he called on Gould, one of the most accurate kickers in league history, but the plan backfired.

Minnesota went the other way for a winning 34-yard field goal by Walsh that dealt a serious blow to Chicago’s playoff hopes and sparked a discussion about Trestman’s decision.

Why didn’t he call at least another play to try to get closer, particularly given how the offence has moved this season and the defence has struggled?

Trestman said the ball was in the middle of the field, the kick was within Gould’s range and he didn’t want to risk a penalty or a fumble.

But is the angle of the kick that important in a dome, where there’s no wind?

Something else to consider: Although Gould is 6 of 7 on attempts from the 40 to the 49 this season, he’s just 72.2 per cent from that range in his career.

By comparison, he’s converted 90.6 per cent on attempts from the 30 to 39.

“I didn’t do it from an analytics standpoint,” Trestman said. “I did it from having been around Robbie the entire year and knowing how he kicks the ball and watching him kick in practice. I had no doubt that he was going to make the kick. You could say that about any kick. But there wasn’t analytics involved as much as there was, we’re clearly in his range. We’re in the middle of the field. We don’t know what’s going to happen on the next play, but it has a chance of not being in the middle of the field. I thought that was well worth the risk.”

He did not consider the possibility of fatigue playing a role in the miss, with Gould playing just hours after the birth of his son.

The decision to attempt a field goal also went against the grain of a coach who’s been willing to gamble. Trestman’s gone for it on fourth down several times this season, including a key fourth-and-1 conversion that helped seal a win at Green Bay.

“Every decision to do the things that we do, are based on this game,” Trestman said. “So I didn’t call on other experiences in other weeks, other than to make the decision that was best for our team yesterday.”