Tag: Supreme Court

People like her were never breast-fed … they went straight to raw meat.

Ariel Dumas (as far as I’m concerned, pronounced: dumb-ass) supposedly is a funny person. In fact, this chick is supposedly *SO* funny that CBS has hired her as one of the staff writers for the late night talk show, “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert”.

Sadly for her, all Dumas really has succeeded at is only one of two things:

She’s nothing more than a vile, petty, vindictive and highly paid full-member of the Hollywood elite

Well, there really is no other viable option that Choice #1 doesn’t already cover

In order for her to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Professor Christine Blasey Ford is making demands of the Senate… and leave no mistake about it, she and her fellow leftists on the judiciary committee full expect the Republicans to blink first.

Conservative rank and file are praying to God that the GOP *achem* “leadership” won’t collapse faster than a house of cards in the middle of Hurricane Florence.

Between Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) jumping the shark today as he claimed he was ready to ooze onto his own personal cross, and Judge Kavanaugh verbally dissecting Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CN) as the good senator made himself look like a complete jackass, suffice it to say that the Dimocrats succeeded in making themselves look like complete and total fools.

But in one bright, shining moment of decency in a committee room that the Dems guaranteed was drug though the proverbial cesspool, something good happened.

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, his wife, Ashley Estes Kavanaugh, and their daughters stand by President Trump after the president announced Kavanaugh’s nomination.

While the committee’s Democrat have done everything in their power to paint Kavanaugh as the evil love child born of Cruella De Vil and fathered by de debbil hisself, the real Brett Kavanaugh is been favorably mentioned, in of all places, in the pages of the Washington Post.

Other than Kavanaugh coaching his youngest daughter’s basketball team (Blessed Sacrament Catholic School), O’Brien also noted;

A few years ago, my husband died. One of the many difficult aspects of that loss was that my daughter had no one to accompany her to the school’s annual father-daughter dance. That first year — and every year since my husband’s passing — Brett has stepped forward to take my daughter to the dance alongside his own.

According to Jesse Watters of Fox News, it was Democrat senators who “coordinated” at least some of the numerous disruptions taking place at Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

However weird things have been inside the Hart Senate Office Building, what’s happening outside is even all the stranger.

As reported by Kristinn Taylor of The Gateway Pundit, “A protester at the Senate hearing for Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh was seen on Tuesday at the Hart Senate Office Building wearing a giant head-to-toe condom costume with a sign that read, ‘Men for Choice’ and ‘CodePink.'”

Never targeted as merely a sex object.

Taylor also made note of the obvious, as well as lone, beta male in the Code Pink pack;

She’s already lit social media aflame, but for reasons you might not expect.

As it turns out, this silken-haired sultry Latina has sent Democrats, Socialists, Antifa, NeverTrumpers, BLM and other assorted power-pouters scurrying for their safe spaces.

Enter 36-year-old Zina Bash, the pride of McAllen, Texas, her family’s adopted home. The daughter of Dr Lawrence Gelman and Maria (née) Esperanza has undoubtedly brought some of the Rio Grande Valley spice to a usually staid Washington, D.C.

Judge Kavanaugh: Zina Bash has his back at Senate hearing.

Actually born in Monterrey, Mexico, suffice it to say that just about everything regarding Zina Bash makes liberal heads everywhere explode;

She obviously OK with women being seen as mere sex objects. After all, she was cited on The Hill’s 2017 list 50 Most Beautiful list.

A self-hating Mexican, Bash is currently employed at the White House where she holds the impressive title of Special Assistant to the President for regulatory reform, legal and immigration policy.

Walking the halls of power.

Her husband, John Bash, is the federal government’s chief law enforcement officer for Central and West Texas. The U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Texas openly admits “that border security, violent crime, public corruption and national security are his top priorities.”

She’s rich, and I don’t mean a little. According to Above The Law, the heiress is (according to an anonymous tipster) worth a cool $18 million.

Both Zina and John self-identify as *GASP!* Republicans.

Her father, a noted anesthesiologist, hospital administrator, author, film producer, media personality, and conservative activist in his own right, recently completed a documentary entitled The Hoax of Man-Made Global Warming. In the film, “he conveys to the audience the archaic methods used by the “hucksters” who perpetrate the “convenient lie” of man-made global warming/climate change for the benefit of their agendas.”

But what really has Twitter abuzz are three accusations by lefties against the comely Latina in regards to today’s Senate confirmation hearing of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court;

She apparently sneers at the Democrat members of the Judicial Committee when they speak ill of Kavanaugh.

She apparently looks smug when Republican members of the Judicial Committee when they speak approvingly of Kavanaugh.

She apparently flashed the White Power sign to the TV cameras (see video below).

But for a taste of lefties setting their hair on fire via Twitter, here’re some nifty posts;

Who is the woman behind #kavanaugh at the hearing with that smug look on her face. She won’t be so smug when her grandchildren are forced to have abortions in back alleyways. Nvm, rich women won’t have to.

What does Buddha Beachwear, the rock band The Slants, the NFL’s Washington Redskins, and the lesbian motorcycle club “Dykes on Bikes” have in common? All either have or will take on the federal government regarding the feds denying certain organizations or groups trademarking the names they choose to identify themselves as.

As reported by Kevin Daley of The Daily Caller, it’s the government’s Patent and Trademark Office that decides if any given trademark registration request is offensive or disparaging to any given person, community, or institution.

The latest tussle brought before the Supreme Court was brought forward by bass guitar player Simon Shiao Tam of the Portland, Oregon rock band The Slants. The Patent and Trademark Office had denied the group’s application to legally lay claim the band’s name, but were turned down on the grounds the name “could give offense to Asians.”

Ironically, the band is comprised entirely of Americans of East Asian lineage.

As reported by The Daily Caller;

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a federal law banning the registration of offensive or disparaging trademarks violates the First Amendment.

The case has major implications for the Washington Redskins, whose trademark was stripped by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and a federal judge last year. The judge concluded that the team name was offensive to Native Americans.

The challenge to the 1946 Lanham Trademark Act, which prohibits the registration of a trademark which “may disparage” a person, community, or institution was brought by Simon Shiao Tam, bass-player for Chinatown dance rock band The Slants. The PTO denied the band’s request for a trademark, finding their name could give offense to Asians. The band is composed exclusively of Asian Americans.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, an appeals court which hears patent and trademark cases, found in Tam’s favor last year.

“A wise old woman and a wise old man will reach the same conclusion.” – Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, 1991

Despite nominees to the third branch of government consistently testifying before Senate confirmation hearings promising in their most convincing voice that they could separate their personal feelings from the legal facts placed before them when it came to rendering decisions, Justice Ginsburg may have tipped her hand concerning the hot-button topic of gender politics. As reported by Yahoo! News on July 31, 2014, and also by the Cybercast News Service on Aug. 1, 2014, Ginsburg more than slightly alluded that due to gender, the five male justices who formed the majority opinion in the recent Hobby Lobby case are somehow incapable of rendering a correct judicial decision regarding members of the opposite sex. Continue reading “Ginsburg ignores the judicial women who sided with ‘the five male justices’”→