On 06Apr2012 00:15, Oleg Broytman <phd at phdru.name> wrote:
| So we can argue in circles both ways, there are too many arguments
| pro and contra. Python is just too inconsistent to be consistently
| argued over. ;-)
Bah! I think these threads demonstrate that we can consistently argue
over Python for weeks per topic, sometimes months and years.
--
Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
Sam Jones <samjones at leo.unm.edu> on the Nine Types of User:
Frying Pan/Fire Tactician - "It didn't work with the data set we had, so I
fed in my aunt's recipe for key lime pie."
Advantages: Will usually fix error.
Disadvantages: 'Fix' is defined VERY loosely here.
Symptoms: A tendancy to delete lines that get errors instead of fixing
them.
Real Case: One user complained that their program executed, but didn't
do anything. The scon looked at it for twenty minutes before
realizing that they'd commented out EVERY LINE. The user
said, "Well, that was the only way I could get it to compile."