"Party officials are privately pushing the White House to publicly blame the Russians in the same way it blamed North Korea for the cyberattack on
Sony and China for intrusions into U.S. companies." CrowdStrike blamed China, CrowdStrike blamed North Korea.

This has me beyond confused. Binney takes a look at the printouts of the DNC docs and says, done from the inside and the NSA would know this due to
data collection systems in place. I accept that as gospel.

Crowdstrike's super duper highly skilled tech boys, the ones needed because the NSA sucks, say "russia did it?" Ostensibly, this is done in order to
frame russia and stop or implicate trump and bring down the duly elected president or start a war?

How is that not an act of war/treasonish/sedition...? How are these tech people who agreed to this not fleeing to the moon? If I getting this right,
and I must not be, if I'm a crowdstrike tech guy I'm headed to Venezuela.

I'm getting this wrong, I have to be.

FYI, moments after the Sony leak, the entire industry knew it was an angry employee, so how blaming NK isn't an act of war I'm confused too.

Thinking if they came to her with all of this "russia/collusion/trump is a foriegn spy" garbage and used the same "evidence" as was given the fisa
court, .... without counter evidence, could she have provided the assistance they needed, only to turn on them after she found out the truth....

which made her the perfect candidate for trump to make her the the new Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

Thinking if they came to her with all of this "russia/collusion/trump is a foriegn spy" garbage and used the same "evidence" as was given the fisa
court, .... without counter evidence, could she have provided the assistance they needed, only to turn on them after she found out the truth....

which made her the perfect candidate for trump to make her the the new Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

This makes sense. However she would've still reported her findings to Trump since she wasn't in on the secret campaign.

My guess is that she discovered material was being intentionally kept from the PDBs.

originally posted by: LurkNoMore
I haven't really been keeping tally but 2018 has been a tuff year for hollywierd and it seems things are just staring to boil over.
hollywoodlife.com...

Doesn't matter. Q has never used the term "suicide week". He has said "suicide weekend" 3 times and the last 2 times no significant suicides took
place. I doubt any will happen this weekend either although, even if it did, Q would be 1 for 3.

......and this explains it! The more I find out about the corruption and cover-ups, the more thankful I am for our current POTUS.

WASHINGTON, D.C. –Congressman Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement today regarding the claim made by the FBI that they have
‘not found any evidence’ regarding Hillary Clinton’s serving being breached:

“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent
Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was
not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.

When I asked Peter Strzok about this, he said that he remembered being briefed by the ICIG investigator but did not remember what it was about. That
is not credible. We know that the FBI’s head of counter-intelligence, Mr. Strzok, was doing all he could to help protect Hillary Clinton. So, when
the Intel IG investigator came to report to Mr. Strzok that a specific foreign intelligence entity (which was not Russian) was receiving virtually all
the emails from Secretary of State Clinton’s private server in real time, it is not remotely believable that he would not remember the conversation.
In fact, if he testified that he remembered the briefing, he would be potentially incriminating himself in a coverup or obstruction role.

One thing has been made acutely clear – partisan politics, sadly, are very much at play within some of the leadership at the FBI. Though Strzok and
other FBI personnel were briefed on Hillary Clinton's server being hacked, as now reported, they knew this would devastate Hillary Clinton’s chances
of being elected and they were not about to let that happen.

Fortunately, progress is currently being made at the FBI and there are good people there who are making a difference. Unfortunately, the FBI’s
deceptive omission in its statement reveals that the FBI has not been completely cleansed of the partisanship that so pervasively corrupted it in
Washington, DC.”

Right, so my thinking is that she was 'duped' into helping thinking she was doing the right thing.... and then as more stuff started coming out and
she gained more information she more than likely did turn on them by taking the information to Trump/Trump administration, or disclosing to him her
involvement when being pegged for her new position.

Considering the melt down they all had when he nominated her was telling for sure. They tried so hard to throw dirt on her and discredit her, and
could that have been because they knew she 'knew' ..... or at a minimum would have some inside information on their dealings.....

"So, when the Intel IG investigator came to report to Mr. Strzok that a specific foreign intelligence entity (which was not Russian) was receiving
virtually all the emails from Secretary of State Clinton’s private server in real time, it is not remotely believable that he would not remember the
conversation."

originally posted by: LurkNoMore
I haven't really been keeping tally but 2018 has been a tuff year for hollywierd and it seems things are just staring to boil over.
hollywoodlife.com...

Doesn't matter. Q has never used the term "suicide week". He has said "suicide weekend" 3 times and the last 2 times no significant suicides took
place. I doubt any will happen this weekend either although, even if it did, Q would be 1 for 3.

Refresh my memory for me if you would... What have you agreed with about Q?

Why fail to mention the process of trading kidnapped kids for information? Or to champion how one of the biggest drug dealers in the world and former
president came from within the ranks - oh and did so without oversight? Chile and the Missing? Geee, why leave out the best parts?

Cranky,

I think this is a matter of the Alphabets reminding us that their employees are the people we least expect them to be.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.