3 trades jets SHOULD make

Darrelle Revis to the Buccaneers for a 2013 first, third, and 2014 third (conditional second). This should give the Jets the #13 and #75 picks this year.

Trade back from the #9 to #11 with the Chargers. In return, the Jets could receive the #11 and #78 picks, the fourteenth selection in the third round.

Trade back from the #13 pick received from the Buccaneers to #31 with the 49ers. In return, the Jets could receive the #31 and #34 picks.

The total haul for the Jets would be the #11, #31, #34, #75, and #78 picks. Add in their own #39 and #74 picks, and the Jets have seven picks in the first 100 selections, opposed to the three they would have started the draft with.

Im for keeping the pick at 9 depending on who is available... Any thoughts?

Darrelle Revis to the Buccaneers for a 2013 first, third, and 2014 third (conditional second). This should give the Jets the #13 and #75 picks this year.

Trade back from the #9 to #11 with the Chargers. In return, the Jets could receive the #11 and #78 picks, the fourteenth selection in the third round.

Trade back from the #13 pick received from the Buccaneers to #31 with the 49ers. In return, the Jets could receive the #31 and #34 picks.

The total haul for the Jets would be the #11, #31, #34, #75, and #78 picks. Add in their own #39 and #74 picks, and the Jets have seven picks in the first 100 selections, opposed to the three they would have started the draft with.

Im for keeping the pick at 9 depending on who is available... Any thoughts?

I would be all for that. You should expect 4 starters out of those 7 picks, would replenish the team with a lot of cheap, young players.

Darrelle Revis to the Buccaneers for a 2013 first, third, and 2014 third (conditional second). This should give the Jets the #13 and #75 picks this year.

Trade back from the #9 to #11 with the Chargers. In return, the Jets could receive the #11 and #78 picks, the fourteenth selection in the third round.

Trade back from the #13 pick received from the Buccaneers to #31 with the 49ers. In return, the Jets could receive the #31 and #34 picks.

The total haul for the Jets would be the #11, #31, #34, #75, and #78 picks. Add in their own #39 and #74 picks, and the Jets have seven picks in the first 100 selections, opposed to the three they would have started the draft with.

Im for keeping the pick at 9 depending on who is available... Any thoughts?

This is silly. Its mere speculation and dreams. The 49ers wouldn't give us that 31 and the 34 for the 13th pick.

I had a similar scenario in a mock draft a while back. Unlikely but you never know. It would all be dependent on who was on the board at the time. San Diego needs an OT badly and if lane johnson is there that trade is viable. If one of the top CB's is on the board at 13 SF could very well be interested in that trade down. They have bags of picks and the value of 31 and 34 is viable for the 13.

Darrelle Revis to the Buccaneers for a 2013 first, third, and 2014 third (conditional second). This should give the Jets the #13 and #75 picks this year.

Trade back from the #9 to #11 with the Chargers. In return, the Jets could receive the #11 and #78 picks, the fourteenth selection in the third round.

Trade back from the #13 pick received from the Buccaneers to #31 with the 49ers. In return, the Jets could receive the #31 and #34 picks.

The total haul for the Jets would be the #11, #31, #34, #75, and #78 picks. Add in their own #39 and #74 picks, and the Jets have seven picks in the first 100 selections, opposed to the three they would have started the draft with.

Im for keeping the pick at 9 depending on who is available... Any thoughts?

I really like your ideas, but am not wanting to let go of Revis for anything less than 1, 2, don't care if they are this or next year. Otherwise, keep him and lock him up forever.

This is silly. Its mere speculation and dreams. The 49ers wouldn't give us that 31 and the 34 for the 13th pick.

Why not they have like 7 picks in the 1st 4 rounds and have very few holes. I think it is a given at some point they trade up. Or maybe even trade out all together for picks next year. If Milliner and Rhodes are both off the board by 10 someone on the bottom half will be looking to trade up for a CB IMO. If SF can have their pick Trufant, Taylor, Amerson and, or Banks at 13 I'd say it is a no brainer for them. Us on the other hand, Personally I'd want more then that. If Rhodes is there you can bet your butt I'd want a LOT more then that.

nothing about this front office gives me confidence that having "lower" picks means drafting good players. Until i am proven wrong by the new GM i'd rather take my chances drafting in the top 10, and keeping the best corner on the planet.

nothing about this front office gives me confidence that having "lower" picks means drafting good players. Until i am proven wrong by the new GM i'd rather take my chances drafting in the top 10, and keeping the best corner on the planet.

Wed only be keeping the best corner on the planet for 1 year, a losing year.

nothing about this front office gives me confidence that having "lower" picks means drafting good players. Until i am proven wrong by the new GM i'd rather take my chances drafting in the top 10, and keeping the best corner on the planet.

I think a lot of people actually feel this same way, not the lower pick part but the part about keeping Revis. The sad fact is that there is a price you have to set and stick to it. It also doesn't help that the owner appears to be totally fed up with dealing with Revis's agents.