>
> | Make two kind definition in accordance
> |
> | "The kind attribute distinguishes between the two kinds of inputs:
> | document inputs and parameter inputs. An input port is a document
> | input port if kind is specified with the value "document" or if kind
> | is not specified."
> | and
> | "The kind attribute distinguishes between the two kinds of inputs:
> | document inputs and parameter inputs. An input port is a parameter
> | input port only if the kind attribute is specified with the value
> | "parameter". It is a static error (err:XS0033) to specify any kind of
> | input other than "document" or "parameter"."
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Is it still wrong?
It was about the error err:XS0033 : you need to read parameter
information to read that kind can only be "document" or "parameter".
But it might be ok now
>
> | p:equal
> |
> | Should the output port result be *non primary* because of the case of
> | using "fail-if-not-equal" to "yes" ?
>
> I don't see how that matters. If fail-if-not-equal is yes, then the
> step will abort and its output won't matter either way.
As a primary port you need to connect it or it is an error. So you
need to use a p:sink or anything else.
>
> | In 2.3 Primary Inputs and Outputs
> |
> | You speak about "primary input", but the example make the distinction
> | between document and parameters ? Especially the sentence with "has
> | exactly one input/output port"
> | I think the confusion come from the fact that "Document Input Port"
> | are named "Input Port"
>
> I think I clarified that a little bit. The note at the bottom of that
> section does say that parameter input ports are special.
>
Fine
--
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 â‚¬