Comments

toby464

DontTreadOnME

" "And yes when I sublet a piece of property I can set my own policies as long as they are not in conflict with the sublet contract. Fool."

And yes when I sublet a piece of property "as long as the lease allows", I can set my own policies as long as they are not in conflict with the "lease".

There, fixed that forya."

Definition of Lease: "A lease is a legal CONTRACT, and thus enforceable by all parties under the contract law of the applicable jurisdiction.". So nothing to fix there, but anyone that can't figure out a written policy probably doesn't understand that a lease is a contract.

flyonthewall

"So I'm done with you fly, we'll see what the WV ethics panel has to say about it."

"And yes when I sublet a piece of property I can set my own policies as long as they are not in conflict with the sublet contract. Fool."

And yet you continued. So where's the "sublet contract" source? Like I said if there is a "lease" then the "policy" needs to be amended to read "County owned and leased". Nah, you'll see what the Commission has to say shortly because you're reading more into the policy than clearly stated. I don't see "leased" in the policy but do see "exceptions".

flyonthewall

DTOM ignores the fact that there are also "exceptions" to the policy allowed. So DTOM is certain there is no exception and goes on ranting and attacking. So here we have the "less govt" crowd insisting on more govt into private affairs. Truly a confused bunch that continues with do as I say not as I do when violating terms of service.

flyonthewall

"It even states which properties the policy applies to, including the meeting room in the library"

So in your mind the govt can dictate everything a private property owner can do with their property? Really? There are some things that govt does have a say in property rights, but meetings is right up there with dictatorship. And yet another who feels above the terms of service has just shown again do as I say not as I do.

flyonthewall

"What does the Tea Party Caucus of Congress have to do with We The People of West Virginia? Nothing." This obviously has to do with a closed door meeting, which happens in DC. Look at the comments with many saying laws, rules, policy, etc somehow violated some open meeting policy. A policy was provided, yet the policy stated County owned. The Library is not County owned. Then we have those who offered their opinions of those involved as either corrupt or gay or whatever. Now you want to tell me I'm biased and you "smell" something? What you just posted doesn't smell. It is a personal attack and is in violation of the terms of service of the Journal that you agreed to. That puts you right up there with those being accused. I have repeatedly hit the report abuse button when personally attacked and the Journal does nothing, so I'll fight fire with fire. I've been called a fool, off meds, stupid, etc. You're just another dufus with an opinion who ignores facts.

DontTreadOnME

" And it starts off with County owned property. The County does not own that library dufus. What part of "county owned" don't you understand? "

You can't really be that stupid can you? did you read the policy? It even states which properties the policy applies to, including the meeting room in the library, my god you truly are an idiot, I've lost my patience for stupid people and you are (at least acting like) a stupid person.

WVValley

What does the Tea Party Caucus of Congress have to do with We The People of West Virginia? Nothing.

Again, Ted Cruz wasn't there. These were Jefferson County citizens. I'm fairly Independent now. But I was a registered Democrat when I first started with WTP of WV. (no one asked, proof not required, I wasn't kicked out) And I did vote for local Ds in the last election. Ds have been endorsed by WTP of WV.

You are sorely biased and misinformed fly. I smell intimate entanglement in this affair.

Bullhead

That is correct. The local Tea Party group in question (We The People) is non-partisan and has Democrats, Republicans, and Independents as members and in its leadership. It is open to all who advocate for limited, local government and lower taxes.

flyonthewall

"Go read the policy, you sound like a fool. Or do you believe that the commission lied on it's rules?"

It's quite possible if they have a long term lease and the lease agreement may allow for the Commission to set policy. If this is the case then the citation you provided needs to be amended to read "owned or leased". See how that works fool?

flyonthewall

"So , let me get this straight. According to Fly, these building use policies only apply to rooms that JCC owns not has a long term lease on , right ......."

According to what DTOM cited as the source below, it clearly says Jefferson County owned and not leased. According to the JC Assessor, deed book 581 page 562 the property at 200 E Washington St belongs to Old Charles Town Library Inc.

Bullhead

Thank you, Fly, I will stand corrected on the authority of the JCDEC then and its affiliation with the JCDA, if you quotes match up with recognized WV law.

However, that just means that the JCDEC was the unseemly ones who promoted a forum about running for office, in public circles--without mentioning that it wasn't open to independents and others--so that when people took the time/gas to show up, they were turned away at the door.

toby464

flyonthewall

So now we have two LTE and one says County policy applies and the other says library policy applies. The library is not County owned, The JCDA falls under the jurisdiction of the JCDEC and the JCDEC is listed under the "exceptions" in the Jefferson County Commission policy. Someone says the JCDA "sponsored" the meeting with no proof, yet the JCDA falls under the jurisdiction of the JCDEC who hosted the meeting. Continue crying the river, especially those with the childish namecalling. Just continue to embarass yourself with LTE that contradict each other. That there is funny.