Saturday, April 16, 2016

Open Mic with Francis, the Moslem invader & communion for unrepentant adulterers Edition!!!

It’s always a fun time when Francis gets a hold of a microphone!

There are some gems, as there always are, in this in-flight interview. Among them; Bernie Sanders greeted him before he left for Lesbos, Francis brought 3 Moslem families (12 people) with him on the return plane trip because they had their papers in order and the Christians did not, Moslems are children of God, having borders and enforcing immigration laws will hurt Europe, all countries need to make bridges towards those invading them, and finally when about the question of sacraments for those in “so-called irregular situations” said that Cardinal Schönborn had the correct answer (hint: communion for all). Bold and underlines in the interview are ours and were added for emphasis. Remember on 7 December 2014, Francis clarified why he makes public pronouncements,

Pope Francis: I thank you for your day of work, for me and also for you it was a bit powerful.

Ines San Martin (Crux): Holy Father, what we’ve read… The first question is about the trip. This trip is happening just after an accord between the European Union and Turkey has come about … Do you think this is a political question in order save time? This morning, you met with the presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, at Santa Martha. I wanted to ask you your sensations on the meeting and on your way of approaching North American politics…

Pope Francis: “First of all, there is no political speculation because I didn’t know much about these accords between Turkey and Europe. I saw them in the newspapers. Bringing these refugees away is a humanitarian thing. It was an inspiration from a week ago that I immediately accepted, because I saw that it was the Holy Spirit who was speaking. Everything was done legally. They’ve come with us with their documents in order. The Vatican, Italy and Greece have given them a visa. They will be welcomed by the Vatican with the collaboration of Sant’Egidio who will find work for them. But they are guests of the Vatican and they are added to the two Syrian families that are already given hospitality by the two Vatican parishes.

Second. This morning when I walked out, there was Senator Bernie Sanders who came to the congress on “Centessimus Annus.” He knew that I was leaving at that time and he had the courteousness to greet me. I greeted him and his wife, and another couple with him that was staying in Santa Marta, because all of the members of the congress, except the heads of state who I believe were staying in their embassies, were staying at the Santa Martha residence. I gave a greeting and nothing more. A greeting is an educated thing to do and does not mean not to be mixed up with politics. If someone thinks that to give a greeting means to get mixed up in politics, I think he needs a psychiatrist.

Franca Giansoldati (Il Messaggero): You speak much about welcoming, but perhaps you speak too little about integration. Seeing what is happening in Europe, where there’s this massive influx of immigrants, we see that there are many cities that suffer from ghetto sectors… in all of this, it emerges that Muslim immigrants are those who have the most difficult time integrating themselves with our values, Western values… wouldn’t it be more useful to favor the immigration of Christian immigrants? And why did you favor three entirely Muslim families?

Pope Francis: I didn’t make a religious choice between Christians and Muslims. These three families had their documents in order. There were, for example, two Christian families who didn’t. This is not a privilege. All 12 of them are children of God. It’s a privilege to be a child of God. For what regards integration…you said a word which in current culture seems to be forgotten, after war still exist: the ghettos. And some of the terrorists are children and grandchildren of people born in European countries and what has happened? There was no policy of integration. And this, for me, is fundamental. In the post-synodal apostolic exhortation integration is spoken of. One of the the three pastoral dimensions for families in difficulty is integration into society. Today, Europe must take up again this capacity that it has always had: to integrate. With integration, Europe’s culture is enriched. I think that we need an education, a lesson, on a culture of integration.

Elena Pinardi (EBU): Holy Father, they’re talking about reinforcing the borders of different European countries, of deploying battalions along the borders of Europe. Is it the end of Schengen, is it the end of the European dream?

Pope Francis: I don’t know. I understand the governments and the people that have a certain fear. I understand. And, we must take a real responsibility for welcoming. How do we integrate these people with us? I’ve said this, but making walls is not the solution. We saw it in the last century, the fall of one. It doesn’t resolve anything. We must make bridges and bridges are made with intelligence, dialogue, integration. I understand the fear, but to close the borders doesn’t resolve anything. Because in the long run, that closure will hurt the people themselves. Europe must make a policy of welcoming, integration, growth, work, the reform of the economy. All of these are the bridges that lead us to not making walls. After what I’ve seen in that refugee camp, and what you saw, was to cry about. The kids. They’ve given me so many drawings. The children want peace because they’re suffering. It’s true that there they have educational courses in the camp. What have they seen? Look at this: what they’ve seen: a drowned child! The kids have got this in their hearts. Today was truly to cry about. It was to cry about. The same drawing was made by an Afghan child. These children have this in their memories. They’ll need time to remove this from their memories. There was a sun that cried in the drawing. A tear would also do us well.

Fanny Carrier (AFP): Why don’t you make a distinction between those who flee because of war and those who flee because of hunger? Can Europe give welcome to the misery of the world?

Pope Francis:It’s true, I said that some run because of war, others because of hunger. Together the two are both the effects of the exploitation of the earth. A head of government in Africa told me more or less a month ago that he is reforesting, because the land that was exploited was dead because of exploitation. Some run because of hunger, others because of war. I would invite the arms producers and traffickers, those who sell them to make war in different places - in Syria for example - I would tell these traffickers to spend a day in that camp, I think it would be healthy for them.

Nestor Pongutà, W Radio (Colombia): Good afternoon, Holiness. I’ll ask you the question in Spanish and then you respond in Italian. You said something very special this morning that really caught our attention: this is a sad trip. (And we understood from your words that you were really moved.) But, something changed in your heart when we found out about these 12 people, with this little gesture you’ve give a lesson to those who have turned their gaze before so much pain, before this “piecemeal third world war.”

Pope Francis: I will respond with a phrase that is not mine. They asked the same thing to Mother Teresa. They would say to her: ‘You spend so much strength, so much work, to help people to die, but what you do is not worth it.’ And she replied: ‘It’s a drop, it’s a drop of water in the sea, but after that drop, the sea will never be the same.’ Like this it’s possible. It’s a small act that we all must do in order to take the hand of those in need.

Josh McElwee (NCReporter): Thank you, Holy Father. We’ve gone to a nation of migrations, but also of an economic policy of austerity. I would like to ask you if you have an economic thought of austerity and also for another island, Puerto Rico. Do you have a thought on this policy of austerity?

Pope Francis: The work austerity mean, from an economic point of view, a chapter of a program. Politically it means another, and spiritually it means another. When I speak, I do so in comparison with waste. The FAO, it seems to me, in a meeting said that with one wasted meal, you could nourish the world. And we, in our homes, how much do we waste without intending to? This culture of waste. Austerity in the sense in which we speak and austerity in a Christian sense, let’s stop here and divide it a bit. I speak only in a Christian sense.

Francisco Romero (Rome Reports): Holiness, I simply would like to say: you have said that this refugee crisis is the worst after the Second World War. I would like to ask you what you think of the crises of migrants that arrive in America, in the United States, from Mexico, from Latin America…

Pope Francis: It’s the same thing. Migrants arrive there fleeing from hunger, etc. It’s the same problem. In Mexico, I celebrated Mass 100 meters from the border, where on the other side there were some 50 bishops from the U.S. and 50,000 faithful in one stadium. It’s the same. They arrive to Mexico from Central America. It’s a global problem. I spoke about it there to the Mexican bishops, I asked them to take care of the refugees.

Frank Rocca (Wall Street Journal): Thanks, Holy Father. I see that the questions on immigration that I had thought to ask you have been asked and answered by you very well. If you permit me, I’d like to ask you another question about an event of recent days, which was your apostolic exhortation. As you well know, there has been much discussion about on one of the many, I know that we’ve focused on this a lot…there has been much discussion after the publication. Some sustain that nothing has changed with respect to the discipline that regulates access to the sacraments for the divorced and remarried, that the Law, the pastoral praxis and obviously the doctrine remain the same. Others sustain that much has changed and that there are new openings and possibilities. For a Catholic who wants to know: are there new, concrete possibilities that didn’t exist before the publication of the exhortation or not?

Pope Francis:I can say yes, many. But it would be an answer that is too small. I recommend that you read the presentation of Cardinal Schonborn, who is a great theologian. He was the secretary for the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, and he knows the doctrine of the faith well. In that presentation, your question will find an answer.[It has been pointed out to us by a reader of CMJ that Francis said the Italian word ‘punto’ which Catholic News Agency translated as ‘many’. The proper translation is ‘period’. Francis’ reply should read, “I can say yes, period.”]

Jean-Marie Guenois (Le Figaro): I had the same question, but it’s a complementary question because you wrote this famous ‘Amoris Laetitia’ on the problems of the divorced and remarried (footnote 351). Why put something so important in a little note? Did you foresee the opposition or did you mean to say that this point isn’t that important?

Pope Francis: One of the recent popes, speaking of the Council, said that there were two councils: the Second Vatican Council in the Basilica of St. Peter, and the other, the council of the media. When I convoked the first synod, the great concern of the majority of the media was communion for the divorced and remarried, and, since I am not a saint, this bothered me, and then made me sad. Because, thinking of those media who said, this, this and that, do you not realize that that is not the important problem? Don’t you realize that instead the family throughout the world is in crisis? Don’t we realize that the falling birth rate in Europe is enough to make one cry? And the family is the basis of society. Do you not realize that the youth don’t want to marry? Don’t you realize that the fall of the birth rate in Europe is to cry about? Don’t you realize that the lack of work or the little work (available) means that a mother has to get two jobs and the children grow up alone? These are the big problems. I don’t remember the footnote, but for sure if it’s something general in a footnote it’s because I spoke about it, I think, in ‘Evangelii Gaudium.’

Thanks a lot, I feel calm with you. Now, they will give you something to eat!

Cardinal Schonborn said in his AL presentation.:"It must be said that the documents of the Church often do not belong to one of the most accessible literary genres..." And a text such as AL" is readable, and those who are not dissuaded by its length will find joy in its concreteness and realism. Pope Francis speaks about families with a clarity that is not easy to find in the magisterial documents of the Church."

So there!

Notice Schonborn implies that AL is a magisterial document by comparison. Pretty much he is contradicting all of the NO priests and cardinals who say AL is not Magisterial.

Furthermore, the Cardinal, in his presentation equates Sacramental Marriage and adultery. As though they are the same.

"Pope Francis’ Exhortation is guided by the phrase “It is a matter of reaching out to everyone” (AL 297) as this is a fundamental understanding of the Gospel: we are all in need of mercy! “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone” (John 8, 7). We are all, regardless of the marriage or family situation in which we find ourselves, are journeying. Even a marriage in which everything is “going well” is journeying. It must grow, learn, and overcome new phases. It knows sin and failure, and needs reconciliation and new beginnings, even in old age (cf. AL 297)."

And the Coup d'Grace:

"My great joy as a result of this document resides in the fact that it coherently overcomes that artificial, superficial, clear division between “regular” and “irregular”, and subjects everyone to the common call of the Gospel, according to the words of St. Paul: “For God has consigned all to disobedience, that He may have mercy on all” (Rom. 11, 32)."

Unfortunately, 99.9999% of the neo-Catholic websites & blogs are pretending to be PLENTY 'confused'. Even when the guy they insist is "pope" TOLD THEM ALL to go read Schonborn's "presentation" regarding "Amoris" (the Joy of Sodomy). No, No, No, Bergoglio didn't MEAN that. He meant something else, because of course, Schonborn SAID IT'S A Magisterial document. So, of course, this 'confusion' is a pretense. All are afraid to lose their 'prestige', their 'friends', their family, their place at the table of the FSSP, SSPX, et al.What good is all that when you are facing individual Judgment? I'm beyond tired of these Johnny-come-lately, neo-Catholics who won't defecate or get off the pot. All they do is keep everyone in Rome's orbit, hoping against hope that a neo-'conservative' "bishop" or "cardinal" in a white hat will ride into Rome to 'save' them from Big, Bad Francis and his big, bad lavender mafia. Sorry folks, "Cardinal" Burke isn't going to do it. "Bishop" Schneider isn't going to do it. Who else can they name as their potential 'conservative' savior?? When they are left swinging in the wind, they will AGAIN refuse to acknowledge WHAT happened, WHO did it and WHY. Pathetic excuses for Catholic men.

In vatican.va there is italian text:http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/it/speeches/2016/april/documents/papa-francesco_20160416_lesvos-volo-ritorno.html"Io potrei dire “si”," "I could say yes,", and no: "I can say yes".What is the correct sentence?

Does vatican.va page editors have realized what Francis said and it is why they have changed the phrase? Or it is not good in English? It looks like a game again.

Jorge and these people (meaning those in the Vatican and THEIR "elder brothers in faith,") are unrelenting in their agenda. But, the demons never give up, do they?

Over at 1Peter5, my comments are viewed as 'bile' and my understanding of our enemies is viewed as "anger" and thinking that 'nothing is ever good enough'. I'm not exactly sure what that last characterization means, except that perhaps I should be satisfied and happy with the few crumbs occasionally thrown to us from the lavish Masonic table of brotherhood. I mean, they haven't killed us yet, right?

Anyway, my outlets for venting are growing smaller by the day. I've been blocked, at last count, from four, or is it five, catholic (sic) websites. It's good to know who are your friends.

Yeah--1P5 (or P6) or "the whore that is in Babylon" has been officially bought: BY STEVE SKOJEC ON APRIL 18, 2016

http://www.onepeterfive.com/comment-policy-is-now-in-effect/

See all the whores featured on their front page:http://www.onepeterfive.com/category/featured-2/

"In His Own Words: Cardinal Schönborn on Exhortation’s Deepest Concerns" Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, the Archbishop of Vienna, Austria, has been chosen by Pope Francis to present his apostolic exhortation, Amoris Leaetitia, on 8 April. We’ve already explored some of his statements over the past few days, because we believe it may shed light on why he was chosen for this particular task. http://www.onepeterfive.com/in-his-own-words-cardinal-schonborn-on-exhortations-deepest-concerns/Did they explore this?https://gloria.tv/?album=3854&page=12 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/22/conchita-wurst-archbishop-vienna-schonborn_n_5374127.htmlhttps://www.lifesitenews.com/news/austrian-priest-overruled-by-cardinal-regarding-homosexual-on-parish-councihttp://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/vatican-consultant-defends-cardinal-schnborn-in-parish-council-flap/It's good to know who are Jesus Christ's friends (not 1p5 & all it's PAID scribes & fairy-see hangers on)

I did not know about the demonic abomination called 'art' in Vienna. But, the fact that no Catholic man has gone in there to destroy it is tantamount to accepting it ---in the name of tolerance of course.

As for whether the 'scribes' and 'fairy-see hangers on', as you call them, are paid for anything contributed at 1Peter5, I don't know and can't confirm. Unfortunately, everything on the internet is suspect and must be viewed with a jaded eye.

Never forget the enemy ensures, prior to agit-prop & revolution that it will have a group in place for every possible dissenting opinion. In order to know what dissenters are doing, one must control the dissent.