The CSS file did not download correctly, the screen reader does not support CSS, or your version of Internet Explorer is too
old for this website.

To get the best possible experience using our website, you should upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer, or use
other browser alternatives. If you are using a computer at work, contact your IT administrator.

For full functionality of this site it is recommended to enable JavaScript.

In Norway, supply of labour by level of education has developed in line with demand for many years. At the same time unemployment
rates and relative wages for different educational groups have been quite stable over time.

In Norway, supply of labour by level of education has developed in line with demand for many years. At the same time unemployment
rates and relative wages for different educational groups have been quite stable over time. Stability in relative unemployment
and wages require that labour demand and supply match well also in the future. Both for future students, employers and the
authorities, projections on demand and supply of labour by different kinds of education are useful information. Students must
decide on which subjects to study, for employers it is important in their long-term planning, and the authorities must plan
educational capacity, industrial development and welfare reforms.

Statistics Norway has produced projections of supply and demand for labour by different kinds of education since 1993. In
this report, we present new projections up to 2030. We use the macroeconomic model MODAG when projecting the demand for labour.
MODAG is a multi-sectoral macroeconomic model that captures linkages between industries. Demand for labour by five educational
groups is modelled for each industry. The five groups are partly substitutes within each industry, and the employment shares
depend on relative wages and technological change. In addition, there is a sub-model disaggregating employment by education
and industry into employment by 28 different fields of education. Previous observed trends are used to divide projected demand
for labour from the five groups into the 28 fields.

The projections show that the previous trends of increasing demand for workers with a tertiary education and upper secondary
vocational education will continue towards 2030. A decreasing share of demand is directed towards primary, lower secondary
and upper secondary general education as the highest level of completed education. For employees with education at the tertiary
level, the projections show a high growth in demand for most of the detailed educational fields, and particularly for candidates
in economics and administration and nursing and social care at a lower level of tertiary education.

Supply of labour by the 28 different fields of education is projected by using the dynamic microsimulation model MOSART. From
a base year, MOSART simulates the further life course for each person in the entire Norwegian population by using estimated
transition probabilities. In the projections, the transition probabilities are kept constant. This implies that educational
propensities and labour force participation rates are constant as well. By comparing the projections of labour demand from
the MODAG simulations with the labour supply from the MOSART simulations, we get some indications of potential imbalances
in the future labour market.

The projections show a higher increase in demand for labour with upper secondary vocational education than the corresponding
increase in supply. A relatively low completion rate for this kind of education is an important factor behind the slow growth
in supply. The projections also indicate future excess demand for teachers and nurses. On the other hand supply may increase
more than demand for tertiary educations in economics and administration, social sciences, law and humanities and arts. Observed
lack of engineers and persons with other fields of science seems to be reduced because of improved completion rates for these
educations.

The projections from this model system are uncertain both because the projection period is quite long and because they are
based on discussable assumptions. On the demand side prolongation of previous trends regarding the composition of labour in
each industry is the most vital assumption, while assumptions of constant transition probabilities are important for the projections
of supply. Demand and supply for the different fields of education are projected independently, and mechanisms working to
reduce future imbalances are not included. Therefore, the results must be used with caution.