Almost 100 years after losing their lives in ferocious First
World War battle, melting ice reveals the bodies of the fallen.

Ah yes. Those were the days when the women had it worse.

... so much so, apparently, that while tens of thousands of
British men were being killed on the battlefields
every month, the
Suffragettes were disrupting the British war effort by smashing
windows, firebombing homes and engaging in acts of civil
disobedience because, apparently, women were being hard done by
compared to men.

And they were also handing out white feathers, signifying
cowardice, to men who were not wearing military uniforms.

Britain will today take a significant step towards reforming
prostitution laws as the first cross-party report for almost 20
years recommends that only pimps and punters should be jailed or
fined.

Wherever men and women are found to be interacting with each
other, feminist-dominated governments will always seek to empower
themselves by criminalising men for their alleged poor behaviours.

(This is how government workers have gotten themselves so much
power - and funding - over the past few decades.)

And no matter how trivial or non-existent these poor behaviours
might be, governments will push any extreme examples of them into
the public mind, but base all their fear-mongering statistics on
those behaviours that are trivial or non-existent.

In the latter case, calling all
allegations of rapes actual "rapes" is one example of
this.

Another example would be the claim that calls to domestic violence
units are coming from people in need of protection. Mostly,
however, they are coming from people who are using the state to
aggress against their partners on their behalf; e.g. see
The Real Face Of
Domestic Violence: The Violation Of Winnie - by AH

A dominant voice in victim-advocacy and research on domestic
violence stands accused of flatly fabricating data.

Jacquelyn C. Campbell, a professor in the Johns Hopkins
University School of Nursing, is accused of fabricating “key
statements [about domestic violence] and then representing the
statements as findings of a government survey.”

All the statistics on
domestic violence and "abuse" etc are fabricated by
feminist-supporting academics - which is most of them.

At the very least, they fudge the definitions to such an extent
that "abuse" is just about anything that a man does, and then
their friends in the media, in the justice system and in the
therapy business hoodwink the public into believing that these
very same statistics apply to the very worst of cases.

... a demonstration of just how easy it is to make the mind feel
that all is well and, hence, actually get better - get better
physically too, in this particular case.

Contrast this with the wicked, self-serving machinations of those
working in the abuse industry who, for
profit, purposely harm people very seriously indeed by
convincing them that they are now permanently damaged beings who
will be "ruined for life" following even the most trivial of
inappropriate incidents; e.g. see AH's
Tea Abuse.

I would be misleading you, wouldn't I? -
despite the fact that the statement would be true.

And this is what politically-motivated academics do all the time.
They expose only the bits of their data that support their agenda.
(In many cases, they just make up the data.)

This occurs often in domestic violence 'research' wherein the
academics will only reveal data that show men to be awful. Any
data suggesting that women might also be awful is purposely
hidden, and not talked about.

The NSPCC does something similar. It actually hides the data that
show children to be better off when they live with both biological
parents by merging it with the data from non-traditional families.

If the people at the NSPCC really cared about children, they would
not do this. In fact, this would surely be one of the last things
that they would do - hide information that shows the best way
for children to be brought up.

So, one million US women are prone to claiming, falsely, that they
have never had sexual intercourse - even though the evidence would
show irrefutably that they had.

Hmm. How many would claim, falsely,
that they did have sexual intercourse, I wonder?

And what if this false claim was of 'unwilling' sex?

Would these women claim, falsely, that they had been raped?

Presumably,
Yes.

One million of them!

So now we can understand better how it is that thousands of women
every year make false allegations of 'abuse' against men.

On Ched Evans - Too drunk to remember does not mean too drunk to
act rationally - by AH

The Ubiquitous
Quest For Power - Recognising that most of what you see going on around you is, by and
large, a quest for power, is one of the most enlightening
experiences that you will ever have, in my view - by AH

1980s
False Memory - with John Stossel - on how children can make
the most ludicrous accusations and on how the abuse industry
implants these inside their minds - 18 min

Notice also how doctors, lawyers and judges working for the
abuse industry - and the juries - can take it as true that
children can have the most enormous and sharpest of objects
forcibly and repeatedly inserted into their various orifices
without leaving any trace whatsoever.

In other words, when it comes to prosecuting men for sexual
inappropriateness, even the laws of Physics and Biology count for
nothing.

Men, apparently, can abuse women and children in the most
horrendous of manners, but not leave a single trace of their
activities.

Thus, not only can men be successfully prosecuted and convicted
without one shred of evidence standing against them, they can also
be convicted of offences which they cannot possibly have
committed.

Michelle Alexander: Locked Out of America - interviewed by
Bill Moyers - on how the people in the underclass (men mostly) are
treated abysmally by a corrupt legal system and how their lives
are completely messed up by it - 35 min

Forensic
Psychology: The Real World of CSI - lecture - an insight into the type
of people who seem to know just about everything - for money -
psychology is a business - always remember that - a few cases
here, a few cases there, and you're an expert! - 80 min

IPCC's Ben
Santer admits ... - on how you can be deceived by people in
the media using various technological techniques to misrepresent
what other people have said - 17 min

Eurovision 2012 Song Contest - three performances that still
make my spine tingle - about 4 min each - big screen and plenty of
volume required for full tingling effect -
Sweden (I
want to marry and dominate her) -
Macedonia
(I want her to marry and dominate me.) -
Albania (Er,
no thanks. But, give it a chance and listen to her amazing voice
as it grows louder and louder. And then imagine her getting angry,
and shouting at you. You'll have the heebie-jeebies for at least a
week!)

Heretical
Thoughts About Science and Society - Freeman Dyson - famous
physicist - with some interesting revelations about how important
climate-change factors are being ignored by climate scientists;
who are, therefore, misleading the public over matters to do with
climate change - 60 min

+
Rorschach Ink Blot Test - as the professor said; It is a
completely bogus test of perception still used by a majority of
American clinical psychologists to determine, for example, whether
or not fathers are fit to be with their own children - 3 min

Islam: A
Religion Of Peace? - Perhaps not , according to some religious
scholars. Do not be put off by the dramatic first few minutes. The
video consists mostly of straightforward academic talk. - 95 min

Are We
Alone? - Combining the latest telescope images with dazzling
CGI, "Finding Life Beyond Earth" looks at the sights and sounds of
alien worlds in our own Solar System - 105 min

Douglas
Adams: Parrots the Universe and Everything - author of The
Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy gives a light-hearted talk about
the apparently absurd lifestyles of the world's creatures, and
gleans from them some unusual insights about the future of
humanity - 90 min

This site uses third-party advertising companies to
serve ads. These companies may use information (not including your name,
address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and
other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services
of interest to you. For example, Google’s AdSense uses the DART cookie
which enables it to serve ads based on a browser’s past Internet usage.