Well I only noticed a drop from 96c to 92c, but I think you may be on to something when it comes to the fans catching up to the temp. Im going to try to adjust the fan speed in the bios or possibly find some other way. I will also look into running a benchmark that takes a little longer so the fans will have more time to run at full speed.

One more update. I used Intel extreme tuning utility to overclock slightly and drop the dynamic cpu voltage and I actually got a slightly higher Cinebench score with a total max out temp of 91c. Im going to play with this some more and see what I can get out of it

the G750 has a rather less aggressive fan speed policy than other laptops I owned - they take a few seconds longer to speed up and they keep high rpm for longer even after load and temps have dropped back to idle. Because of this, the max temps you will record are almost always going to be the ones that develop in the first 10 seconds of benchmarks...

A 100-200mhz is not worth for the increased effect you will get.
The cooling is pretty good so i don't think it will throttle but 3,4/3.6 is like 5% faster cpu.
A gaminglaptop with this week gpu compared the cpu will probably not benifit much from the 5% faster cpu however my guess is that the heat scales diffrent so it will be abit warmer.

If you should change something try undervolt it like 70-100mv and get it to run cooler.

This is a gaminglaptop and the diffrence is for sure not noticeable in any game, only thing you notice is more heat from cpu.

I'm not sure about that gebba123, I've seen several benchmarks where some modern cpu-heavy games have gotten tangible FPS gains when using an i7-4900 instead of an i7-4700. As long as there are games where part of the bottleneck IS the cpu, there is something to gain overclocking it. although I don't think I'm going to bother

A 100-200mhz is not worth for the increased effect you will get.
The cooling is pretty good so i don't think it will throttle but 3,4/3.6 is like 5% faster cpu.
A gaminglaptop with this week gpu compared the cpu will probably not benifit much from the 5% faster cpu however my guess is that the heat scales diffrent so it will be abit warmer.

If you should change something try undervolt it like 70-100mv and get it to run cooler.

This is a gaminglaptop and the diffrence is for sure not noticeable in any game, only thing you notice is more heat from cpu.

If im using intel extreme tuning which values exactly should I be undervolting?

Mine was at the -70 too and i had no problems bf4 beta kept crashing after a while and also my pc started randomly restarting every 2 days and when i opened xtu it said it crashed so clocks were reset to defaults..what is a stable clocks for this cpu? what are u guys using? i have the same cpu 4700hq... i pulled the offsets down to 59 and i benchmarked it lost 5 points. but i have no idea if its stable now.

Mine was at the -70 too and i had no problems bf4 beta kept crashing after a while and also my pc started randomly restarting every 2 days and when i opened xtu it said it crashed so clocks were reset to defaults..what is a stable clocks for this cpu? what are u guys using? i have the same cpu 4700hq... i pulled the offsets down to 59 and i benchmarked it lost 5 points. but i have no idea if its stable now.

It does get confusing with all the variables involved, but keep in mind that the CPU should run fine at default settings. If you don't want to think about tuning for a while, put things back at defaults and enjoy your gaming, then come back to tuning later.

Increasing the multipliers to max settings is only 5% increase, modest and unlikely to overheat your CPU unless you have a bad paste job - which might be some. Check your temps at stock before turning up the multipliers. You can also run stock speeds with voltage offsets to reduce temps.

Setting the voltage offset to -50mV for CPU/cache should be stable for everyone, but it varies by CPU. Any amount that runs stably for your CPU is good, it will reduce the heat output. Also good to do at stock CPU speeds, really cool temps then.

For me setting at -65mV is stable, even under sustained load, but if I go to -75mV it will reset occasionally. I haven't tried -70mV, but I will at some point because it will reduce the heat further.

All tuning gets to the point where you might be 1 or 2 points off of failure, and stable.

Are you sure the BF4 crashes were due to CPU? BF4 hits the GPU pretty hard too. I ran BF4 for hours at 5200mhz Memory on the GPU. CPU ran fine at max multiplier and -65mV on CPU/cache.