U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, THE ADVENT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE, & THE FUTURE OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT IN
THE U.S.A.: AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM, AMERICAN FEDERALISM, & THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE OF THE
REACH & EXTENT OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE U.S. CENTRAL GOVERNMENT -- THE TASK OF CONFINING THE CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT TO ITS DELEGATED POWERS, THE POWERS DELEGATED TO THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT BY THE U.S.
CONSTITUTION -- THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIMITED GOVERNMENT & SMALL GOVERNMENT -- POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY &
THE LEGITIMACY OF GOVERNMENT -- THE POLICE POWERS OF THE STATES & THE NATIONAL SUPREMACY CLAUSE IN THE
U.S. CONSTITUTION -- THE EXPANDING SOCIAL WELFARE STATE & THE VIABILITY OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT -- ILLEGAL
IMMIGRATION & THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STATES

FREE SPEECH RIGHTS & HOSTILE AUDIENCES: AMERICA'S NATIONAL COMMITMENT TO PRESERVING FREE SPEECH IN
THE FACE OF HOSTILE AUDIENCES -- THE KORAN BURNING CONTROVERSY & DISSOLUTION OF THE RESOLVE TO PRESERVE
FREE SPEECH -- THE EMERGING LEGAL DOCTRINE HOLDING THAT AVOIDING OFFENSE TO MUSLIMS IS ESSENTIAL TO THE
U.S. NATIONAL INTEREST & THEREFORE TRUMPS THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUAL AMERICANS -- OPENING
THE DOOR FOR U.S. COURT INJUNCTIONS AGAINST SPEECH THAT INFLAMES MUSLIM SENTIMENT IN STRATEGICALLY
IMPORTANT LOCATIONS -- LAYING THE LEGAL FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT EXERCISE OF THE POWER OF CENSORSHIP
OVER A CITIZEN'S EXPRESSION OF PERSONAL VIEWS ON A MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION & THE BOGUS LAWSUIT AGAINST THE STATE OF ARIZONA: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
& U.S. ATTORNEY-GENERAL ERIC HOLDER ENGAGED IN THE SELECTIVE "ENFORCEMENT" OF U.S. LAW, WHEREIN CRIMINAL
ACTIONS ARE IGNORED OR DISMISSED IF COMMITTED BY SUCH THUGS AS THE NEW BLACK PANTHERS AGAINST COMMON
CITIZENS ATTEMPTING TO VOTE, WHILE DECENT & HONORABLE EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF ONE'S
COUNTRY OR ONE'S STATE AGAINST AN INVASION OF ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE TARGETED FOR LEGAL DISSOLUTION -- THE
LAWSUIT & DECISION OF THE FEDERAL JUDGE AS REPRESENTING AN IMMEDIATE DANGER POSED TO THE PEOPLE OF
ARIZONA & AN ENORMOUS BREACH IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE AMERICAN NATION'S ENTIRE LEGAL SYSTEM -- THE
FAILURE OF THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE PRESERVATION OF DOMESTIC TRANQUILITY IN THE U.S.A. A
SINGLE FEDERAL JUDGE THWARTING THE ABILITY OF A STATE TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS & LIBERTIES OF ITS CITIZENS

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION & ITS ENDEAVOR TO TRANSFORM THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF JUSTICE: A
METHODICAL & PREMEDITATED EFFORT OF THE WHITE HOUSE & THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO FUNDAMENTALLY
REINVENT THE AMERICAN CONCEPT OF JUSTICE -- THE APPALLING TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA'S ONCE SHINING
SYSTEM OF JUSTICE FROM A GUARANTOR OF FREEDOM & LIBERTY FOR HONEST CITIZENS INTO A WEAPON BY WHICH THE
IRON FIST OF A CORRUPTED GOVERNMENT IS MERCILESSLY WIELDED AGAINST DISSENTING POLITICAL OPPONENTS --
RAPID DEGENERATION OF WHAT HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN A BASTION OF GOOD ON WHICH THE LAW-ABIDING COULD REST
THEIR HOPES FOR RECTITUDE INTO A MEANS OF COERCION, CONTROL, & OPPRESSION -- A FRONTAL ASSAULT ON THE
AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES OF EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW & THE RIGHT OF LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS TO
VOTE IN FREE & UNFETTERED ELECTIONS -- USING THE IMMENSE POWER & RESOURCES OF THE U.S. NATIONAL
GOVERNMENT TO FORCE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE INTO CONFORMITY WITH THE TWISTED RADICAL LEFTWING LIBERAL
IDEOLOGY OF BARACK OBAMA & ERIC HOLDER

INTERNATIONAL LAW & THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: CAN INTERNATIONAL LAW ABROGATE THE FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & THEREBY NULLIFY THE RIGHTS OF AMERICANS ENUMERATED IN THAT
AMENDMENT? CAN U.S. DOMESTIC FREE SPEECH RIGHTS REALLY BE IN JEOPARDY FROM UNITED NATIONS TREATIES
BANNING "HATE SPEECH" OR RECENT EFFORTS TO PROSCRIBE "DEFAMATION OF RELIGIONS? U.S. COURTS & HOW
THEY CONSTRUE TREATIES LIMITING FREE EXPRESSION -- FINDING COMPELLING GOVERNMENT INTERESTS THAT TRUMP
THE FIRST AMENDMENT

THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION & THE FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTER OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT: THE ROLE
OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE -- THE BASIC ISSUE: CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
THROUGH THE AMENDING PROCESS OR THROUGH JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION -- THE INTENT OF THE FRAMERS OF THE
CONSTITUTION VERSUS THE INTENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA & HIS FELLOW LIBERAL LEFTIST IDEOLOGUES IN
CONGRESS & ON THE SUPREME COURT -- THE PLOT TO UNDERMINE & DESTROY CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT & CIVIL
LIBERTIES IN THE U.S.A.

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, THE JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS, & JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AS A PHILOSOPHY TO
GUIDE JUDGES IN INTERPRETING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA'S NOMINATION
OF A RADICAL JUDICIAL ACTIVIST & UNABASHED RACIST FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT -- PRESIDENT
OBAMA'S TOTAL LACK OF COMMITMENT TO CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, THE RULE OF LAW, JUDICIAL RESTRAINT,
& AMERICA'S SYSTEM OF CHECKS & BALANCES -- OBAMA'S DETERMINATION TO EXPLOIT ETHNIC, RACIAL, & GENDER
IDENTITY POLITICS & UTILIZE A RADICAL ACTIVIST SUPREME COURT TO SUBVERT THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES
WHICH GOVERN OPERATION OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT & LIMIT THE POWER OF THIS GOVERNMENT

LIBERALISM, CONSERVATISM, & THE FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN NATION: PRESIDENTIAL & CONGRESSIONAL
ELECTIONS, REPUBLICAN HOPES FOR VICTORY IN 2008, & THE NEED TO DEMONSTRATE A STARK & DEFINING CONTRAST
BETWEEN THE INCREASINGLY LIBERAL LEFTIST IDEOLOGY & POLICY AGENDA OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY & A STRONG &
UNBENDING CONSERVATIVE RIGHTIST STANCE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY -- THE NEED FOR A SUPERHAWK REPUBLICAN
PRESIDENT & A CONGRESSIONAL MAJORITY THAT WILL SUPPORT HIS ADMINISTRATION IN SECURING AMERICA'S BORDERS
AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION & TERRORIST INFILTRATION, AS WELL AS IN EFFECTIVELY PROSECUTING THE WAR
AGAINST ISLAMIST TERRORISM -- THE NEED FOR A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENCY & SENATE MAJORITY THAT WILL CONTINUE
TO FILL FEDERAL COURT VACANCIES WITH JUDGES WHO ADHERE TO & DECIDE CASES IN ACCORD WITH THE TRUE
PRINCIPLES OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, REJECTING THE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OF LEFTWING LIBERALS SEEKING TO
OBLITERATE THE BOUNDARIES OF GOVERNMENTAL POWER ESTABLISHED BY THE CONSTITUTION

JUSTICE DEFILED; JUSTICE DENIED: ABUSE OF THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM BY CORRUPT & OVERLY AMBITIOUS
PROSECUTORS -- THE NEED FOR MUCH GREATER PROTECTION OF LAW-ABIDING AMERICANS FROM THE EXTREME ABUSES
PERPETRATED BY UNSCRUPULOUS POWER MONGERS LIKE MICHAEL NIFONG & PATRICK FITZGERALD WHO WILL GLADLY
ANNIHILATE THE LIVES & LIBERTIES OF THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS IN RUTHLESS PURSUIT OF CAREER & POWER

THE "WE THE PEOPLE" ACT: PROPOSED CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION DESIGNED TO CURB JUDICIAL ACTIVISM &
PREVENT ACTIVIST FEDERAL JUDGES FROM UNDERMINING & DESTROYING AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM,
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT, & LIBERTY UNDER LAW -- LEGISLATION TO PROTECT AMERICAN FEDERALISM, STATE
AUTONOMY, & LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT -- WHAT ACTION MUST WE TAKE TO ENSURE PASSAGE BY CONGRESS OF H.R.
5739?

LEGISLATION AGAINST JUDICIAL ACTIVISM:
New Bill to Protect the Republic from
Activist Judges Needs Cosponsors

By Tom DeWeese

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM, HUMAN RIGHTS, & THE WAR ON ISLAMIST TERRORISM: THE INHERENT
WEAKNESSES OF HUMAN NATURE & THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF OPERATING ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT HUMAN
RIGHTS ARE THE PRODUCT OF GOVERNMENTAL BENEVOLENCE, RATHER THAN GOD-GIVEN NATURAL RIGHTS & LIBERTIES
LIMITING THE POWER OF GOVERNMENT & PROTECTING THE INDIVIDUAL & SOCIETY AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL TYRANNY
-- THE MOST RECENT ABOMINABLE & FLAGRANTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL DECISION RENDERED BY THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT -- DELIBERATELY MISINTERPRETING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & INVOKING "INTERNATIONAL LAW" IN
ORDER TO SIDESTEP U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON THE SUPREME COURT'S JURISDICTION & TO THWART A
HISTORICALLY LEGITIMATE PROCEDURE BY WHICH THE U.S.A. CAN DEAL WITH ENEMY COMBATANTS OF A
PARTICULARLY DESPICABLE & DANGEROUS NATURE

THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM VERSUS LEFTWING LIBERALISM & JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: PROPOSED
CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION DESIGNED TO PROTECT AMERICA'S CONSTIRUTIONAL FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
AGAINST LEFTIST LIBERAL ACTIVIST FEDERAL JUDGES WHO ABUSE THE JUDICIAL AUTHORITY, SEEKING TO UNDERMINE
& DESTROY OUR GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM, CENTRALIZE POLITICAL POWER, & IMPOSE ON AMERICAN SOCIETY THEIR
OWN PUBLIC POLICY PREFERENCES OR THOSE OF RADICAL ACTIVIST SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS

THE BASIS OF AMERICAN LAW: JUDEO-CHRISTIAN MORAL & ETHICAL ABSOLUTES, AS CODIFIED IN THE TEN
COMMANDMENTS -- LAWLESSNESS AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT -- REJECTING THE BOUNDARIES
OF ABSOLUTE TRUTH & UNDERMINING THE RULE OF LAW

U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARINGS ON JUDGE SAMUEL A. ALITO, NOMINATED BY PRESIDENT GEORGE W.
BUSH FOR APPOINTMENT TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: JUDGE ALITO'S RUNNING
THE GAUNTLET THROWN DOWN BY PARTISAN DEMOCRATIC INGUISITORS ASKING GRUELING QUESTIONS & MAKING
POLITICALLY BIASED PRONOUNCEMENTS EXPRESSING THEIR OWN LIBERAL LEFTIST NOTIONS REGARDING ISSUES OF
AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT

WHAT IS AT STAKE IN THE UPCOMING BATTLE OVER U.S. SENATE CONFIRMATION OF SAMUEL ALITO'S NOMINATION TO
FILL A VACANCY ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: WHETHER AMERICA'S BROKEN LEGAL SYSTEM WILL EVER BE
REPAIRED & TRUE JUSTICE RE-ESTABLISHED IN AMERICA -- ALITO'S JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY: ONE OF DEFERENCE TO
THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AS AN ABSOLUTE STANDARD -- WHY LIBERALS OPPOSE ALITO'S CONFIRMATION:
THEIR FEAR THAT MUCH OF THE LIBERAL PUBLIC POLICY AGENDA WILL BE RELEGATED TO THE BALLOT BOX,
WHERE IT VERY LIKELY WILL BE DEFEATED

THE PRESIDENT & THE JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS: PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH'S NOMINATION OF SAMUEL ALITO
FOR APPOINTMENT TO A VACANCY ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT -- RALLYING AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES &
BOLSTERING THE CONCEPT OF A SUPREME COURT WHOSE ULTIMATE PURPOSE IS TO UPHOLD & DEFEND THE INTEGRITY OF THE
OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN & AS PROPERLY AMENDED -- PROTECTING & PRESERVING THE
AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC

OPERATION OF AMERICA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AT THE STATE LEVEL, FEDERAL HABEAS REVIEW OF STATE COURT
CONVICTIONS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL ERROR, & THE PROPOSED STREAMLINED PROCEDURES ACT OF 2005: THE ROLE OF
DELAY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM & HOW THE STREAMLINED PROCEDURES ACT WOULD FIT INTO THE ENTIRE SYSTEM
-- HOW THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION WOULD CLEAR OUT THE PROCEDURAL UNDERGROWH THAT FOSTERS DELAY, WHILE
ENABLING THE U.S. FEDERAL COURTS TO CONSIDER CASES WHERE THERE EXISTS LEGITIMATE CLAIM OF FACTUAL INNOCENCE

USE OF HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS IN THE U.S. COURTS TO CHALLENGE CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS IN THE STATE COURTS:
HOW THE FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCESS IS FAILING TO ACCOMPLISH ITS INTENDED PURPOSE -- HOW THE PROCESS
IN DEATH PENALTY CASES IS INTERFERING WITH IMPORTANT RIGHTS & POWERS OF THE STATES UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
-- HOW THE PROCESS IS UNDERMINING PUBLIC RESPECT FOR THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

THE FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCESS:
ITS IMPACT ON THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

By Kent Cattani

CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY, THE RIGHTS OF VICTIMS OF CRIME, & THE INTERESTS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC: ABUSES THAT
NOW INFECT THE HABEAS CORPUS SYSTEM IN THE U.S.A. -- THE PROPOSED STREAMLINED PROCEDURES ACT OF 2005 & HOW IT
WOULD ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS IN AMERICA'S HABEAS CORPUS SYSTEM -- HOW THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION WOULD HELP
PROTECT CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS & ENCOURAGE FAIR & EFFECTIVE USE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN HABEAS CORPUS
CASES

CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY & CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: THE NEED FOR CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION TO EFFECTIVELY &
STRICTLY LIMIT USE OF THE RIGHT TO HABEAS CORPUS AS THE BASIS OF FEDERAL COURT APPEALS BY PERSONS UNDER
PENALTY OF DEATH, DUE TO CONVICTION IN STATE COURTS OF CAPITAL OFFENSES -- THE STREAMLINED PROCEDURES ACT:
PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO UPDATE THE ANTITERRORISM & EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996, REDUCE THE
BACKLOG OF FEDERAL COURT APPEALS FROM STATE CONVICTIONS IN MAJOR CRIMINAL CASES, & HELP BRING CLOSURE TO
THE FAMILIES OF VICTIMS OF VIOLENT CRIME

JUDICIAL RESTRAINT & CONSERVATISM VERSUS JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & LIBERALISM: THE RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING
CONTROVERSY OVER THE PROPER MAKEUP OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IN GENERAL & THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN
PARTICULAR -- THE CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED ROLE OF THE U.S. COURTS: INTERPRETATION & APPLICATION OF
EXISTING U.S. LAW IN LEGAL CASES & CONTROVERSIES COMING BEFORE THE COURTS -- JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING &
DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC POLICY AS A USURPATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF CONGRESS & THE STATES & A
VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION -- ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME
COURT: PERSONAL HONESTY & INTEGRITY, KNOWLEDGE OF & ADHERENCE TO THE LAW, & DETERMINATION TO
MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED & WRITTEN

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION & THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF AMERICANS
UNDER THE CONSTITUTION: AN ASSAULT REFLECTED IN THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN KELO VERSUS CITY OF
NEW LONDON -- HOW THE KELO DECISION TIES IN WITH THE UNITED NATIONS, "INTERNATIONAL LAW," AGENDA 21,
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, STATISM, AUTHORITARIANISM, & POLITICAL CORRUPTION -- WHY AMERICA'S FOUNDING
FATHERS WOULD BE OUTRAGED TO LEARN OF THIS PERFIDIOUS & REPREHENSIBLE JUDICIAL DECISION GROSSLY DISTORTING THE
MEANING OF THE TAKINGS CLAUSE IN THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, SMART GROWTH,
& THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S KELO DECISION:
ORGANIZED THEFT BY ANY NAME

By
Tom DeWeese

JUDICIAL DESTRUCTION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: DECIMATION OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL
PRINCIPLES BY AMORAL, LEFTWING LIBERAL JUSTICES ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT -- THE LATEST RASH OF
OUTRAGEOUS U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS: DEMONSTRATION THAT THOSE AT THE APEX OF POWER IN THE U.S.A.
ARE WELL ON THE WAY TO DESTROYING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, ASSUMING DICTATORIAL CONTROL OVER THE AMERICAN
POPULATION, & TRAMPLING THE LONG-STANDING RIGHTS OF U.S. CITIZENS

THE SELLOUT: THE SOCALLED "COMPROMISE" OF MAY 23, 2005 -- THE SURRENDER BY SEVEN SOCALLED "MODERATE"
REPUBLICANS IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE TO THE LEFTWING LIBERAL DEMOCRATS' FILIBUSTER OF REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT
GEORGE W. BUSH'S JUDICIAL NOMINEES -- WILL CONSERVATIVES COME TO GRIPS WITH THE FACT THAT FIFTY-TWO TRULY
CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN SENATORS WOULD CONSTITUTE A BETTER & MORE RELIABLE MAJORITY THAN A LARGER
SENATE REPUBLICAN MAJORITY CONTAINING "MODERATES" READY & WILLING TO BETRAY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY & ITS
LEADERSHIP, COLLABORATE WITH LIBERAL LEFTIST DEMOCRATS, & UNDERMINE THE CONSERVATIVE ENDEAVOR TO RESTORE
CONSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY TO THE UNITED STATES COURTS

JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS & PARTISAN POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE: HOW LIBERAL DEMOCRATS IN THE
U.S. SENATE WORK TO BLOCK APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES WHO WILL UPHOLD THE INTERGITY & TRUE MEANING OF
THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION -- WHY CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS NEED TO MAKE CLEAR THAT THE SENATE FIGHT
OVER JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS IS ABOUT PROTECTING & PRESERVING THE BASIC FEATURES OF THE AMERICAN
CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM, INCLUDING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, SEPARATION OF POWERS, CHECKS & BALANCES, INDIVIDUAL
LIBERTY, & POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY

AMERICAN JUSTICE AS A DARK MYTH: HOW AMERICA'S POLITICAL LEADERS ALTERNATELY UPHOLD & IGNORE "THE
LAW" IN A HIGHLY SELECTIVE & SELF-SERVING MANNER -- POLITICAL OPPORTUNISM, LIBERAL HYPOCRICY, & THE LEGAL
DOUBLE STANDARD OPERATING TO FURTHER THE SUBVERSIVE ENDS OF AMERICA'S POLITICAL & CULTURAL LEFT

THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY & RESPONSIBILITY OF CONGRESS TO ENACT LEGISLATION THAT WOULD PREVENT ACTIVIST
FEDERAL JUDGES FROM USING A FLAWED INTERPRETATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO REWRITE THE LAWS &
TRADITIONS GOVERNING MARRIAGE: THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO PASS THE PROPOSED MARRIAGE PROTECTION ACT &
THEREBY STAND AGAINST DESTRUCTIVE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & FOR TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE

UNBRIDLED JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: ACTIVIST FEDERAL JUDGES IGNORING THE CONSTITUTION & LAWS OF THE UNITED
STATES & DECIDING LEGAL CASES & CONTROVERSIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE JUDGES' OWN PERSONAL POLITICAL VIEWS &
PUBLIC POLICY PREFERENCES, THEREBY USURPING THE LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION & MAKING LAW, RATHER THAN INTERPRETING
& APPLYING EXISTING LAW -- THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL LEFT'S INCREASING USE OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY TO DO IN
COURT WHAT IT CANNOT DO AT THE BALLOT BOX OR IN CONGRESS & THE STATE LEGISLATURES: ADVANCE AN
ULTRA-LIBERAL, ACTIVIST, SECULAR, MULTICULTURAL POLITICAL AGENDA WHICH MOST AMERICANS OPPOSE -- HIGH TIME
FOR CONGRESS TO REASSERT ITS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO DEFINE & RESTRICT THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL
COURTS, INCLUDING THAT OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT -- THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO BEGIN IMPEACHING & REMOVING FROM
OFFICE FEDERAL JUDGES WHO DO NOT FOLLOW THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

UNRESTRAINED GOVERNMENT BY AN OUT-OF-CONTROL FEDERAL JUDICIARY: A JUDICIARY THAT IS DESTROYING THE
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AMERICA'S CONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL REPUBLIC, OUR SYSTEM OF LIMITED, DIVIDED &
BALANCED GOVERNMENTAL POWER, & THE POLITICAL AUTONOMY OF THE MEMBER-STATES OF THE AMERICAN FEDERAL
UNION -- THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO LIMIT THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION
OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, AS WELL AS THE JURISDICTION OF THE LOWER FEDERAL COURTS

THE LATEST BRAND OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: ACTIVIST U.S. FEDERAL JUDGES CONSIDERING & USING FOREIGN &
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SOURCES WHEN DECIDING CASES, EVEN THOUGH SUCH SOURCES OFTEN CONFLICT WITH THE
CONSTITUTION & LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES -- THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER OVER
THE FEDERAL COURTS & SEND FEDERAL JUDGES A STRONG MESSAGE THAT AMERICANS WILL BE GOVERNED BY AMERICAN
LAWS ONLY & THAT JUDGES WHO VIOLATE THEIR OATH OF OFFICE WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE FEDERAL BENCH

THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE AMERICAN FEDERAL SYSTEM, & THE PROPOSAL TO ADD AN AMENDMENT TO THE
U.S. CONSTITUTION DEFINING MARRIAGE SO AS TO EXCLUDE HOMOSEXUAL DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS -- THE DAMAGE THAT
SUCH A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WOULD DO TO WHAT IS LEFT OF AMERICAN FEDERALISM & THE RESERVED
POWERS OF THE STATES -- FEDERAL STATUTORY LEGISLATION THAT WOULD MORE EFFECTIVELY THWART THE SECULAR,
PRO-GAY POLITICAL & CULTURAL LEFT &, AT THE SAME TIME, PREVENT THE FURTHER EROSION OF STATES' RIGHTS:
LEGISLATION THAT CONGRESS COULD ENACT TO PREVENT ACCEPTANCE & RECOGNITION OF GAY "MARRIAGES" FROM BEING
IMPOSED ON THE STATES BY THE U.S. COURTS

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & ITS THREAT TO THE RULE OF LAW, CHECKS & BALANCES, & AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT:
HIGH TIME FOR AMERICA'S CONSERVATIVES TO UNITE & STAND FIRM IN SUPPORT OF LEADERS READY, WILLING, &
DETERMINED TO TAKE DECISIVE LEGAL & POLITICAL ACTION TO REMOVE FROM OFFICE JUDGES ABUSING THE LAW &
EXERCISING UNCHECKED POWER, BRING THE JUDICIARY UNDER THE LIMITS, RESTRAINTS, & CONTROLS OF THE LAW, &
THEREBY PUT AN END TO JUDICIAL TYRANNY & RULE BY LAWLESS, OUT-OF-CONTROL JUDGES IN AMERICA

THE LAWSUIT INDUSTRY & THE AMERICAN ECONOMY -- LAWYERS SEEKING TO ENRICH THEMSELVES BY SERVING CLIENTS WHO
SEEK TO BE PAID FOR EVERYTHING THEY THINK IS WRONG WITH THEM, PRESUME IT TO BE THE FAULT OF SOMEONE ELSE, &
BELIEVE THE HARD-EARNED WEALTH OF THE LATTER SHOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE FORMER: A PRACTICE THAT IS
ABUSIVE TO THE RULE OF LAW & TO THE HEALTH & ECONOMIC WELL-BEING OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE -- HIGH TIME FOR TORT
REFORM & PROVISION FOR EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF THE U.S. ECONOMY AGAINST PREDATORY LAWSUITS

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS IN THE U.S. SENATE & THEIR FILIBUSTER OF THE PRESIDENT'S JUDICIAL NOMINEES: THE
DETERMINATION OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC MINORITY IN THE SENATE TO PREVENT THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL
JUDGES WHO ARE DEDICATED TO UPHOLDING THE INTEGRITY OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION & PRESERVING THE
ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENT -- CONSERVATISM VERSUS LIBERALISM, JUDICIAL RESTRAINT VERSUS
JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: WHETHER THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, AS ENVISIONED BY THE FOUNDERS, WILL
PREVAIL OR FADE INTO OBLIVION -- REPUBLICANS MUST STAND FIRM & UNITED IN COUNTERING LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC
OBSTRUCTIONISM & IN FIGHTING FOR SENATE CONFIRMATION OF PRO-CONSTITUTION JUDGES

PARTISAN POLITICS, JUDICIAL NOMINEES, & THE SENATE FILIBUSTER:
GOP SENATORS ARE BEYOND THE POINT OF NO RETURN

By
Christopher G. Adamo

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: ENEMY OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY & THE TRUMP CARD OF THOSE WHO, IN
SERVICE TO THEIR OWN POLITICAL AGENDAS & IDEOLOGIES, SEEK TO UNDERMINE & DESTROY THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION, THE RULE OF LAW, LIBERTY & JUSTICE UNDER LAW, POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, & THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE

THE AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, NATURAL-RIGHTS POLITICAL
PHILOSOPHY, & U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS -- THE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICE'S ADHERENCE TO THE
ORIGINAL MEANING & INTENT OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & HIS USE OF NATURAL-LAW & NATURAL-RIGHTS PHILOSOPHY TO
DEFEND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT: THE GREATEST THREAT TO THE ENDEAVOR OF THE POLITICAL
LEFT TO REPLACE AMERICA'S TRADITIONAL SYSTEM OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT WITH A FULL-BLOWN REGULATORY-WELFARE
STATE OF UNLIMITED POWERS

THE POLITICAL CONTROVERSY OVER APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE U.S. COURTS: THE
CONTINUING BATTLE BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVES SEEKING A FEDERAL JUDICIARY THAT INTERPRETS THE
U.S. CONSTITUTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT THE CONSTITUTION ACTUALLT SAYS & LEFTWING LIBERALS DEMANDING
THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES WHO ARE COMMITTED TO THE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY & RADICAL PUBLIC POLICY
AGENDA OF LEFTWING LIBERALISM & ARE DETERMINED TO MAKE FUNDAMENTAL LAW THROUGH JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION,
READING THEIR OWN IDEOLOGICAL NOTIONS & POLICY PREFERENCES INTO THE COUNSTITUTION & DESTROYING GENUINE
CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT IN THE PROCESS

AMERICA'S COURTS & THE RAVAGES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: HIGH TIME FOR AMERICANS TO BEGIN HOLDING THEIR
JUDGES TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON THEIR AUTHORITY & TO SOME STANDARD OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THEIR
OFFICIAL ACTIONS & DECISIONS

HOW THE COURTS OF OUR LAND SHOULD INTERPRET THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION -- JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION
OF A CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT THE PROVISION WAS GENERALLY UNDERSTOOD TO
MEAN AT THE TIME IT WAS ADOPTED: THE THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION HELD BY SUPREME COURT
JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA

U.S. SENATE DECISION-MAKING ON CONFIRMATION OR REJECTION OF A FEDERAL JUDGE NOMINATED BY THE
PRESIDENT -- THE EFFORT OF LEFTWING LIBERAL ADVOCACY GROUPS & DEMOCRATIC PARTY POLITICIANS TO ELEVATE
PARTISAN POLITICAL IDEOLOGY TO AN UNPRECEDENTED LEVEL OF CONSIDERATION & DEEMPHASIZE THE JUDICIAL NOMINEE'S
ABILITY & WILLINGNESS TO ABIDE BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL OATH & ADHERE TO THE RULE OF LAW

RECENT DECISIONS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT INVALIDATING FEDERAL STATUTES WHICH ENCROACH ON THE POWERS
RESERVED TO THE STATES BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION -- JUDICIAL DECISIONS THAT ARE FIRMLY WITHIN THE MAINSTREAM OF
TRADITIONAL AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL THOUGHT

IN WHAT SENSE IS "JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY" OR "IDEOLOGY" A PROPER & LEGITIMATE CONCERN OF THE U.S. SENATE
WHEN DECIDING WHETHER TO CONFIRM OR REJECT THE APPOINTMENT OF A PERSON NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT TO
FILL A VACANCY ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT OR ON SOME OTHER FEDERAL COURT?

SENATE CONFIRMATION OR REJECTION OF PROPOSED FEDERAL JUDGES NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT TO FILL
VACANCIES ON THE U.S. COURTS -- SHOULD POLITICAL IDEOLOGY MATTER IN THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES?

THE PRESENT MAJORITY ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT & ITS INTENTION TO INCORPORATE BY JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION
SIGNIFICANT PARTS OF EUROPEAN LAW INTO AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -- SHOULD WE ALLOW THESE LIBERAL
LEFTIST JUSTICES TO RADICALLY TRANSFORM & EUROPEANIZE THE SUPREME LAW OF OUR LAND?

THE PROPER ROLE OF THE U.S.SENATE IN THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES -- SENATE CONFIRMATION OF PROPOSED
JUDGES NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT: SHOULD POLITICAL IDEOLOGY BE INJECTED INTO THE CONFIRMATION
PROCESS?

TO CONFIRM OR NOT TO CONFIRM -- THE U.S. SENATE'S EXERCISE OF ITS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO CONFIRM OR
REJECT PROPOSED SUPREME COURT JUSTICES NOMINATED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.: WHAT CRITERIA SHOULD
THE SENATORS USE IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO CONFIRM OR REJECT A NOMINEE

THE UNITED STATES COURTS, JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, & THE JUDICIAL NOMINATION & CONFIRMATION PROCESS -- THE
ROLE OF THE U.S. SENATE IN CONFIRMING & REJECTING PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATIONS OF JUDGES TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE
FEDERAL BENCH

THE FEDERAL JUCICIARY & THE SENATE'S ROLE
IN THE JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS PROCESS

By
Dr. Ronald D. Rotunda

ABUSE OF THE FILIBUSTER IN CONTROVERSIES OVER U.S. SENATE CONFIRMATION OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES -- THE
FILIBUSTER'S USE BY A MINORITY FACTION IN THE SENATE TO THWART THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AS EXPRESSED
THROUGH A MAJORITY OF THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IN THE SENATE

WHY U.S. SENATE CONFIRMATION OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES, COUPLED WITH PARTISAN USE OF THE FILIBUSTER TO PREVENT
REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS FROM CHOOSING CONSERVATIVE FEDERAL JUDGES, IS A PROCESS THAT IS BROKEN & NEEDS TO BE
FIXED

THE FILIBUSTER & THE JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT PROCESS
IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

By
Dr. John C. Eastman

LEGAL & JUDICIAL HARLOTRY & ITS IMPACT ON JUSTICE -- SHOULD THE MANUFACTURER OF A PRODUCT BE HELD LEGALLY
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HARMUL, INJURIOUS, & DESTRUCTIVE RESULTS OF A CONSUMER'S DELIBERATE MISUSE OF THE
PRODUCT?