26.6.12

US, Israel plan joint
military exercise to confront Iran

A US Army Patriot Missile launcher(SAMs) Iran has only a few Hawke SAMs from the 1970's..150 and even fewer Russian SAMs...only 30. Total 230 SAMs.....far too few for such a vast country, with possible 2500 targets. About 1800 LAA. Iran needs to lease air-defense equipment from Russia and China. Iran has 190 combat ready planes out of 340 combat planes..and an airforce of 18,000 personnel, and 12,000 air-defense personnel.

By Presstv.com

Israel and the United States are
planning to hold their largest ever joint military drill aimed at
confronting Iran in October when the result of international sanctions
against Tehran will be determined.

About 3,000 US soldiers and thousands of Israeli troops will take
part in the drill.

In line with efforts to coordinate the details of the exercise,
Commander of the US 3rd Air Force Lt.-Gen. Craig A. Franklin has
recently paid a visit to Israel to establish a planning committee with
the representatives of the US and Israeli militaries.

During the drill, Israel will deploy its upgraded Arrow 2 missile
defense system for the first time while the US will bring its Aegis
Ballistic Missile Defense System to Israel and install PAC-3 Patriot air
defense systems as a security network.

Security officials believe that the exercise sends a clear message
to Iran which has announced that it will attack the Israeli regime in
case of any act of aggression against its nuclear facilities.

Some analysts say the drill will be a test of the situation that may
occur following the Israeli regime’s attack on Iranian nuclear
facilities.

The United States and Israel have repeatedly threatened Iran with a
military ‘option’ in an attempt to force the Islamic Republic to halt
its nuclear energy program, which Washington and Tel Aviv claim has a
military component.

Iran rejects the allegations, arguing that as a committed signatory
to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it has the right to use
nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

On Sunday, Commander of the Aerospace Division of Iran's Islamic
Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Brigadier General Amir-Ali Hajizadeh said
the Islamic Republic will strongly confront any possible assault
against the country.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran has no interest in wars with other
countries, but we will strongly confront the enemies’ possible
aggression and will give them a response that will make them regret the
aggression,” he stated.

-- Senior Israeli officials now confirm that Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu has, "decided to attack Iran before the U.S.
elections in November."

Netanyahu's agenda is much broader than knocking out Iranian
nuclear installations for his aim is to reshape the
political landscape in the USA and Israel shifting
everything to the far, far right in order to create a new
comfort zone for religious fundamentalists.

Netanyahu's major backer, Sheldon Adelson, is now firmly
behind Mitt Romney, and they are known to believe that an
Israeli attack on Iran in September or October will displace
Obama and many dovish Democrats in Congress and establish a
hawkish regime in Washington.

Israel
has agreed to restrain any attack on Iran until after the
current round of five talks between Iran and the P5+1 that
will come to an end in either late July or August:

The website cites U.S. defense contracts and Israel's
new military preparations, suggesting that 'all sides
are getting ready for whatever may come.'

Israel and the U.S. are pushing forward with
preparations to jointly strike Iran's nuclear
facilities, the U.S. blog Business Insider reported on
Saturday.

"U.S. defense contracts, an Iranian F-16 acquisition,
and Israel's new military preparations suggest that all
sides are getting ready for whatever may come," the
report says.

According to the blog, the U.S navy has recently signed
a $338 million contract with defense contractor Raytheon
to "provide the Navy with 361 Tomahawk cruise missiles
in their most recent configuration. According to the
website, the U.S. is either renewing its stock of
missiles or planning ahead.

"On May 9," the report added, "the U.S. House of
Representatives passed the United States-Israel Enhanced
Security Cooperation Act of 2012, which seeks to
"reaffirm the commitment to Israel's security as a
Jewish state; provide Israel with the military
capabilities to defend itself by itself against any
threats... [and] expand military and civilian
cooperation."

A senior Israeli official recently told Reuters that
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has decided to attack
Iran before the U.S. elections in November." (Haretz,
June 23, 2012, emphasis added)

Military experts have long agreed that the
"sweet spot" for an Israeli attack on Iran will be this
coming September or October
precisely because of the timing of the US presidential
election cycle.

For maximum political impact and minimal diplomatic
responsiveness, the time of the Democratic National
Convention in Charlotte, NC - September 3-6 comes within
this window of opportunity as well as the days immediately
prior to the US election - say from Halloween till the 6th
of November.

It may
be instructive to recall that Israel's Operation Cast Lead
was timed to coincide with the transition between Obama and
Bush and ended abruptly immediately before the Inauguration
in January 2009.

Presidential election cycles have played major roles in the
design of military timetables. For only one example, recall
the Tet Offensive in early 1968 that drove LBJ out of the
race for the White House.

There is gossip that Obama is a product of the CIA who nurtured him as their child from a very early age......indeed the gossip goes, Obama is a love child of two CIA agents, his mother and his unofficial CIA father (Not the Kenyan one).

When he became president so the narrative went, Obama liked to take his time over key issues, and weigh all possible angles and options. Gravitas and forethought of a true thinking President.

This was especially the case with matters pertaining to security, an area which he otherwise never pretended to understand or grasp..and he preferred to defer to the real professionals. After all he was a former constitutional professor at Harvard, who had just won a Noble Peace prize.......and clearly, the narrative went he was a different breed to that of Bush junior, who shot from the hip first and asked questions later.

On the other hand we have another narrative which says that Obama is a superficial shape shifting chameleon who is primarily backed by Wall street.

Thus his first main act in power, in January 2009 was to give free public taxpayer money to the Wall Street banks so that they could feel better about their self induced calculated mistakes. $700 billion or was it $2000 billion...we will never know.........but certainly out-stripping the measured generosity of the Bush two administration in late 2008, when the financial crisis started.....and so that they could make more money at the expense of ordinary taxpayers.

In the latter context, his Afghan escalation makes sense, even though his nurturing mother, the CIA advised otherwise in 2009....as did his Vice President, and to a lessor extent the symbolism of European hope that he would be decidedly different and far better than Bush II in the realms of war and security.

Put simply Afghanistan makes huge amounts of money from the heroin trade for the Wall Street and London Bankers, and Obama as puppet of the bankers can't have any other policy than to sustain and even escalate American troop involvement in that fake non-war.

To these creatures it is irrelevant whether 3000 foreign occupation troops have died in that theater, or that many thousands of Afghans have died, or that the cost to the USA taxpayer is probably over $1000 billion for the "Afghan war" (2001--2012), or that the trade in heroin corrupts and compromises American security and the military. Or that the business in heroin harms many Americans when the Pentagon/CIA import it into the USA via private airfields or military bases in the USA.

Obama is a criminal, for whom the highlight of four years in office is the killing of a few misguided Third World individuals, far far away as duped patsies in a fake war run by American intelligence and the Pentagon. Bravo !

The Alternative in the Jew imposed vaudeville is a Zio-Nazi.

But logically based purely on his record the "House-nigger" should go vacate the Whitehouse in January 20th 2013.

Biden’s memo centered on the idea that, while confident that more
troops would be able to chase insurgents from villages, the Afghan
government was still not credible, nor able to actual secure any of
those “gains.” He recommended a smaller escalation.

In practice even Biden’s assessment was a bit rosy.

The surge
dramatically increased the death toll in Afghanistan, but here in summer
2012, all of the same problems present in summer 2009 remain, and
perhaps have worsened in some ways.

Though officials are publicly
claiming “progress” the administration has signed a pact with Afghan
President Hamid Karzai to keep troops on the ground in Afghanistan
through 2024.

Were anyone to still believe the rhetoric of the so-called “Arab
Spring,” one would be admittedly confused over the emerging political
landscape in Egypt where the military establishment and the Muslim
Brotherhood have emerged from what was supposedly a “pro-democracy”
“popular uprising.”

However, if anyone understood that the “pro-democracy” protesters
were in fact US State Department-funded, trained, and equipped mobs
providing cover for the attempted installation of the Muslim Brotherhood
amongst many other potential Western proxies, the current political
battle would make perfect sense.

Image: Mohammed Morsi (above) is the Muslim
Brotherhood’s current presidential candidate. As evidence continues to
mount against the Brotherhood, implicating them as overt proxies of
Western foreign policy, their credibility took another blow as the US
State Department’s April 6 Movement endorsed Morsi. Below, Egypt’s youth
are once again duped by Western propaganda and fellow Egyptians
conspiring against their own nation and people.

….

The Egyptian military, like in many developing nations, may accept
money from the West,

may train with Western forces,

and may even
participate in Western machinations of global domination,

but are
ultimately nationalists with the means and motivation to draw lines and
check the West’s ambitions within Egypt and throughout Egypt’s sphere of
influence.

The necessity for the West of removing not only Hosni
Mubarak who had refused to participate in a wider role against Iraq and
Iran, but the grip of the military itself over Egyptian politics and
replacing it with the Muslim Brotherhood who is already hard at work in
Syria attempting to overthrow one of Iran’s primary regional allies, is
paramount.

“Pro-democracy” movements, particularly
the April 6 youth movement, trained, funded, and equipped by the US
State Department, serve the sole purpose of giving the Muslim
Brotherhood’s installation into power a spin of “legitimacy” where
otherwise none exists. Those within these “pro-democracy” movements with
legitimate intentions will be inevitably disappointed if not entirely
thrown under the wheels of Western machinations as regional war aimed at
destroying Iran, Syria, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah arch of influence
slowly unfolds.

Muslim Brotherhood were, are, and will be Western Proxies

Despite the Brotherhood’s lofty rhetoric, it has from its inception
been a key proliferator of Western foreign policy.

Currently, the Syrian
arm of the Muslim Brotherhood has been involved heavily, leading in
fact, the US, Israeli, Saudi, and Qatari-backed sectarian violence that
has been ravaging Syria for over a year. In a
May 6, 2012 Reuters article it stated:

“Working quietly, the Brotherhood has been financing Free
Syrian Army defectors based in Turkey and channeling money and supplies
to Syria, reviving their base among small Sunni farmers and middle
class Syrians, opposition sources say.”

While Reuters categorically fails to explain the “how” behind the
Brotherhood’s resurrection, it was revealed in a 2007 New Yorker article
titled, “The
Redirection” by Seymour Hersh, as being directly backed by the US
and Israel who were funneling support through the Saudis so as to not
compromise the “credibility” of the so-called “Islamic” movement. Hersh
revealed that members of the Lebanese Saad Hariri clique, then led by
Fouad Siniora, had been the go-between for US planners and the Syrian
Muslim Brotherhood.

Hersh reports the Lebanese Hariri faction had met Dick Cheney in
Washington and relayed personally the importance of using the Muslim
Brotherhood in Syria in any move against the ruling government:

“[Walid] Jumblatt then told me that he had met with
Vice-President Cheney in Washington last fall to discuss, among other
issues, the possibility of undermining Assad. He and his colleagues
advised Cheney that, if the United States does try to move against
Syria, members of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood would be “the ones to
talk to,” Jumblatt said.” -The
Redirection, Seymour Hersh

The article would continue by explaining how already in 2007, US and
Saudi backing had begun benefiting the Brotherhood:

“There is evidence that the Administration’s redirection strategy
has already benefitted the Brotherhood. The Syrian National Salvation
Front is a coalition of opposition groups whose principal members are a
faction led by Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian Vice-President who
defected in 2005, and the Brotherhood. A former high-ranking C.I.A.
officer told me, “The Americans have provided both political and
financial support. The Saudis are taking the lead with financial
support, but there is American involvement.” He said that Khaddam, who
now lives in Paris, was getting money from Saudi Arabia, with the
knowledge of the White House. (In 2005, a delegation of the Front’s
members met with officials from the National Security Council, according
to press reports.) A former White House official told me that the
Saudis had provided members of the Front with travel documents.” -The
Redirection, Seymour Hersh

It was warned that such backing would benefit the Brotherhood as a
whole, not just in Syria, and could effect public opinion even as far as
in Egypt where a long battle against the hardliners was fought in order
to keep Egyptian governance secular. Clearly the Brotherhood did not
spontaneously rise back to power in Syria, it was resurrected by US,
Israeli, and Saudi cash, weapons and directives.

And most recently, as the West frequently does before elections it
wishes to manipulate, premature claims by the Muslim Brotherhood of a
victory during a presidential runoff were made headlines by the Western
media in an effort to portray the Brotherhood as the victors and lay the
groundwork for contesting any results other than a decisive win for the
West’s proxy of choice.

Image: From the US to Serbia, to Egypt and back
again, US State Department-funded, trained, and equipped agitator Ahmed
Maher poses at the scene of “Occupy D.C.” Ironically, Americans claim
Maher and his “April 6″ movement have inspired them to rise up against
their corrupt government, unaware that his movement was insidiously
created by the US government. Photo: courtesy Ahmed Maher, Spencer
Ackerman

Maher it should be remembered, had
been in the US, Serbia, and back again to the US for a series of
training and networking opportunities arranged by the US State
Department before during and after the so-called “Arab Spring.” What
seemed like politically ideological opposites, between April 6 and the
Muslim Brotherhood, in fact share a common denominator – they are
instruments executing Western foreign policy.

Libya, Egypt, Syria and Beyond to Form United Front Against
Iran

Weakening Egypt before NATO’s assault on Libya was a crucial step in
ensuring the latter’s absolute destruction and the creation of what is
now a Libyan terror-emirate shipping cash, weapons, and fighters east
and west to destabilize and overthrow various governments on the
Anglo-American’s long “to-do” list. The West’s ability to install a
Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt, with it’s substantial regional
standing and influence would be a serious blow not only to Syria, but to
Iran as well. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is
already echoing calls by the US and Israel for “intervention” in
Syria.

Along with Libya, Egypt and of course the Gulf States of Saudi
Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, and with the possibility of the Brotherhood
coming to power in Syria as well, a
united front against Iran would be formed and prepared to fight a
proxy war on the West’s behalf against the Islamic Republic.

Such a reordering has not only been mapped out in US foreign policy
documents like Brookings Institution’s “Which
Path to Persia?” report, but
mirror designs against China where all of Southeast Asia is slated
for destabilization, regime change, and realignment to carry out the
West’s ambitions to contain and even collapse a rising China.

The first thing one must say is that the UK/USA installed the mullahs into power, for whatever reason in 1st February 1979, but generally NOT for good reasons. The puppet Shah had outlasted his usefulness to them.

Since then Iran singularly along with North Korea have become the greatest pariah states on earth, constantly demonized by the International Jewish media with considerable help from the puppet mullahs themselves, and their caricature puppet fronts (Ahmedinejad).

Iran is also an extremely corrupt un-Godly state. There is a considerable divergence between what the mullahs say and what they do. Mass Deception.

Real living standards have declined in Iran since 1979, and have never recovered to their 1979 levels.

In 1979 PPP per capita income was near $18,000 at present prices.....and
now in 2012 it is near $13,000.

5 million mostly educated Iranians have left Iran, or have been squeezed out of Iran by the mullah regime. They have taken their vast skills with them mostly to the West.

The mullah regime NATURALLY has become a target of hate and military aggression by Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Israel, USA, UK, little Qatar and even little Azerbaijan. This would not have happened under the puppet Shah......the mullahs are natural foils of hatred because of what they represent, and what they do, and what they often say through their backsides. The mullahs treat diplomacy as Friday sermons at the Mosque.

Naturally their defense/security policy is very very poor.

One the one hand the closure of the USA/UK/Israeli embassies in Tehran is excellent for ensuring greater security of the country. However modern spies do not always operate from the embassy as embassy staff......Modern NGO's, journalists, businessmen, tourists can also act as very very good spies of the USA/UK/Israeli who come with bad intentions.

Iran's borders are poorly managed, and the mullahs have not fully secured the Afghan/Pakistan/Iran borders......the Persian Gulf Coast, the Iraq/Iran border through which many criminality takes place....the Turkish/Iran border...the Azerbaijan/Iran border....the Turkmen/Iran order.

There isn't a fully integrated radar system with local stations that cover the whole country, nor EXTENSIVE local bases for sending security personnel to infiltrated areas. In some areas it would take several hours for security forces to reach the area......even if detection of infiltration took place.

At a more general level conventional forces are weak. I am talking about the conventional forces that would do the bulk of the ACTUAL fighting against Israel/USA incursion/invasion.

The CIA Taliban in 2001, CIA Saddam in 1991 and 2003, and CIA Gaddafi in 2011 were defeated by one thing ONLY, they ALL had weak air power/air-defense, and the USA/NATO had strong air-power. Weak misguided puppets of the USA which with their poor security policy and close infiltration of their governments are attacked, and occupied by the USA.

According to Jane's IISS Military Balance, Iran has only 190 jet fighters that can take to the air and defend the country. These planes in themselves are mostly 3rd generation fighters from the 1960's and 1970's design. The mullahs for 33 years have not either bought in bulk from Russia or China more modern jet fighters or built one for themselves......or undertaken joint production with Turkey/Pakistan.

This is the first obvious stark FAILURE of the puppet mullahs brought into power by the USA/UK.

The mullahs boast every day about building aircraft carriers and sailing to the Atlantic, Mediterranean, or destroyers, frigates, BUT such projects are irrelevant to the REAL defense of Iran. The threat is on the Iranian land mass where jet fighters, AA guns and SAMs play the main role. Iran has about 1,800 AA guns and far fewer SAMs of USA origin and out dated (HAWK).

Iran requires 1000 serviceable 4/5th generation interceptor jets, and 100,000 full-time in the air-force. At least 20--30,000 AA guns of 20, 40, 100mm caliber. About 3000 SAM systems.....and another 100,000 personnel in air-defense capacity......full time personnel. If they do their job properly there will be no ground invasion, or even a threat of an attack in the first place. If they however look weak......where the Israelis and Americans think they can destroy them in a few weeks, then ground invasion or further air attacks against 2500 targets in Iran will take place which will comprehensively destroy the country, its infrastructure, with the addition of many civilian casualties and the eventual collapse of the regime.

My intelligence states that clearly the mullah regime is a puppet regime brought into power by the USA/UK, and that even though these two predatory regime may not have embassies in Iran, never the less they have their "contacts" and "agents" in the country through whom false security is promoted. .....which diverts from the real military objectives of the country for 33 years of mullah rule.

The mere 3% of GDP expenditure on defense is another indication of this fact, along with the huge misuse of public funds into offshore accounts of the mullahs, and the massive corruption which is tolerated by the mullah run regime which is accepted as normal in public, with an absence of creating clear strategies for combating these crimes.

After air-defense/air-power is overcome in a few weeks 2/3, the next defense of Iran will be the army. Unfortunately the mullahs as puppets of the USA/UK have divided and thus weakened this area by creating two parallel and competing forces, with the politicized businessmen of the Pasdran given greater priority in terms of respect, responsibility and financial support. The Pasdran's performance against Iraq between 1980--1988 was extremely poor, but given the mass desertion from the Shah's conscripted army (70%) it is understandable why the Pasdaran was created THEN.

There is no excuse why the Pasdaran should still exist, and the Pasdaran and Artesh should have been integrated as one force from 1991, otherwise they NATURALLY work against each other at cross purposes.

No other country in the world has two separately organized armies.

It would be reasonable for the regular army to be kept at 800,000 full-time professionals with no conscription, with a reserve of 700,000. They should be moved out with their equipment from their normal bases, and especially from the big urban areas. Focus should made on small scale fighting. The Pasdaran at 300,000 with no reserve, carrying out specialized ops outside of Iran when the need arises.

The Bassej disbanded, as it is very dangerous to create a peoples militia...and where a high percentage of Iranian youths naively admire the USA....it will be very foolish to arm them and mobilize them in time of war......only to find out that a considerable number do not believe in the mullah paradise.

Hezbollah with 5000 fighters, The Iraqi Sunni resistance with 30,000 fighters, the Afghan Mujaheddin with 70,000 fighters and the Vietcong with 500,000 were relatively small Third World forces who fought well, irregular warfare, with very poor basic equipment. Iran does not need to go down that path as it is a significant state with significant state resources at its disposal which need to be used efficiently, effectively and wisely.

Iran's Majlis Speaker Ali Larijani
has underlined the necessity for improving the country’s defense
capabilities to the highest level and in proportion to enemies’ threats.

“We should pay attention to defense preparedness so that our defense
capabilities meet the highest [level] as far as possible,” Larijani
said Saturday in a Tehran ceremony marking the Islamic Revolution Guards
Corps (IRGC) Day.

He emphasized that other than cultural efforts the country must be
defensively well-equipped as well and noted that “our defensive efforts
must conform to our country’s terrain diversity as well as the enemies
[military] capacities.”

Insisting that the country’s confrontation with the
enemy in the international scene is multifaceted, Larijani added that at
some cases our enemies engage in rogue political measures against us
and in other instances they resort to other sorts of pressure to
undermine our nation.

The present conditions as well as the country’s national interests
call for the high deterrence preparedness of the Armed Forces, he
concluded.

Under International Law, if it still has some relevancy post Bush II, 9/11, American Full Spectrum Dominance, Project for a New American Century 2000, and GWoT, a state which is a neighbor of a nation under going popular revolution or occupation by a foreign power must shelter, house, feed, arm and train the Freedom Fighters of the nation experiencing revolution.

This part of International Law was painstakingly developed over many decades post 1945, and eventually recognized, in clear recognition of the anti-colonial struggles of many African and Asian nations in the 1950, 1960's and 1970's even.

However states which find themselves as neighbors/hosts of revolutionary struggles must always make rational judgments before they support ANY anti-state struggles in neighboring countries under the very broad and subjective principles of "Self Determination."

One basic logical question would be the nature and composition of the revolutionary anti-state groups:

How did the organization begin?

Who are its leaders?

What are the basic ideological principles of the revolutionary group?

What kind of state do they intend to imposed if they are eventually victorious?

What impact will such a revolutionary government have on the host?

Do they represent a genuine section of the population of the country which they want liberated?

Do they have just cause, morally?

Is the present government in the country against whom there is a revolt, extremely bad, corrupt, inefficient, run by thugs with no intentions of negotiation and compromise or reform.......therefore there is no other option but armed struggle?

In the case of the Turkish backed "al-CIA-duh in Syria" carrying out the "Salvador Option" on behalf of the USA/NATO with direct help from the USA/NATO personnel on the ground in Turkey........where evidence has been explicitly shown (deliberately chosen words), then one would state that the revolt against the otherwise moderate, secular, socialist, popular, and thus legitimate government of Bashar al Assad in Damascus is not justified.

The Bashar al Assad government is not perfect, but then few governments in the world are perfect. The Canadian government is not perfect run by Neocons for two terms. The UK government is not perfect run by criminals of a mass order, who think they are anointed to meddle in the world whilst simultaneously the country itself fails in all respects......The American government is not perfect...run by the Wall Street Mafia with a penchant for permanent war, drugs trafficking and laundering, whilst a feudal society cum police state is created on the sly in the JEWSA; A grey dark bleak state run by Jews as a pose to the shining beacon of hope and light unto the world that its founders envisaged.

Living standards are far too low with PPP per capita of just $5000 in Syria after 42 years of Ba'athist rule. Living standards and PPP per capita income should be closer to $16000 after 42 years of Baathist rule. Syria exports some oil, and has received generous aid from the former Soviet Union .....this capital and wealth should have been used to create a PPP economy of $315 billion and not a mere $105 billion as it is now (2012). The Ba'athist government of the Assad dynasty has thus clearly mismanaged the family run economy, without really benefiting the people.

Another criticism is that the Assad's belong to a minority, the Alawite Shia who constitute just 13% of the overall population of Syria....and therefore not truly representative of the whole population.

However it must be stated that in many of the 194 nations of the world the leaders are more often than not drawn from exclusive groups which are not representative of the whole population. In the UK for example the leader of the country must be from a "Public School"---cold showers, homophilia, no girls, Upper Middle Class, detachment from normal society, Victorian racist education, talentless mediocre dumb asses who have been turned and compromised. In Pakistan either from the military or the Zamindars/Tamindars land owning families which are backed by huge block vote constituencies........and so on. In Egypt the military generals...Nasser, Sadat and Mubarak.

So Assad's Syria is not perfect, BUT.

What will "al-CIA-duh in Syria" with the "Salvador Option manifesto" bring to Syria?

One hazards a guess that it will not be anything stellar and promising for the good Syrian people, but positively grim and dark. In short, worse than the Assad regime. Much worse than the Assad regime, CLEARLY. It will become a perfect foil for future further NATO/USA "liberation" on the ground, as with Iraq and Afghanistan, and repeated Gaza like Israeli intervention, once and if heaven forbid "al-CIA-duh" is installed in Damascus as the legitimate government.

What does the Turkish state get from such a scenario/outcome?

What benefits did Turkey get from Libyan Liberation, by the NATO/USA and 'al-CIA-duh' in Libya?

What benefits did Turkey get from Tunisian Liberation,
by the NATO/USA covert destabilization ops and 'al-CIA-duh' in Tunisia?

What benefits did Turkey get from Egyptian "Liberation",
by the NATO/USA covert ops and 'al-CIA-duh' in Egypt?

Has Turkish companies won huge new contracts in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, or far greater direct influence in the new post revolutionary governments beyond handshakes and symbolic PR ego related photo-ops in Libya, Tunisia and Egypt?

Does Abe Libya, Tunisia and Egypt have a good safe future in the present circumstances?

Did some European powers promise Turkey entry to the EU, if it attacked Syria? If so is that a logical basis for EU entry?

Abe Turkey and Erdogan the crypro-Jew must think hard before facilitating 'al-CIA-duh in Syria' through the "Salvador Option' of the USA.

One thinks a string of "al-CIA-duh' governments in the Levant and Med is not good for the future stability and prosperity of modern secular Turkey.

If "al-CIA-duh' governments are installed in several Near East states will the Turkish armed forces participate with NATO/USA/Israel in liberating these very same regimes further in the future?

It is time for Doenme Turkey and crypto-Jew Erdogan to think clearly and seriously about the general trajectory of Turkish foreign policy, and criminal involvement.

__________________

Iran urges Turkey,
Syria to exercise restraint in downed jet issue

Iran's Foreign
Minister Ali Akbar Salehi

Presstv.com

Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar
Salehi has called on Turkey and Syria to exercise restraint with regard
to the issue of the recent downing of a Turkish fighter jet by Syria.

In a Saturday telephone conversation with his Turkish counterpart
Ahmet Davutoglu, Salehi called on both sides to remain calm, and
expressed optimism for the peaceful settlement of the issue through
restraint and calm.

Syria on Friday confirmed shooting down a Turkish fighter jet flying
over its territorial waters, stressing that it engaged the jet in its
own airspace “according to the laws that govern such situations.”

According to a military statement issued on Friday, the F-4 Phantom
was downed in Syrian territorial waters west of the village of Om
al-Tuyour in Lattakia Province, 10 kilometers from the beach.

Ankara had earlier said that its military lost radar and radio
contact with the jet over the Mediterranean after it took off from Erhac
Airport in the eastern Turkish province of Malatya.

The Turkish military provided no details about the mission of the
jet.

“These are shabiha of Bashar
al-Assad’s regime,” the narrator said, referring to the opposition’s
name for pro-government armed gangs, and adding that they had been
killed by the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA) after clashes in northern
Syria.

The SANA state news agency cited sources as saying the victims had
been abducted earlier on Friday from Darat Izza, a village in Aleppo
province. Activists said 26 government supporters had been shot dead by
rebels.

As with most news of massacres from either side, little about the
incident can be independently confirmed. But this type of behavior is
consistent with earlier findings, like those from
the UN, which describe crimes and atrocities being committed by the
opposition fighters, including extrajudicial killings and torture.

Still, these are the groups to whom the Obama administration has
directed the
CIA to funnel money. Covert operatives are reportedly working in
neighboring Turkey to coordinate the delivery of arms and heavy
artillery to parts of the opposition deemed to be suitable.

But no so-called “vetting process” could ensure the weapons wouldn’t
be used by unscrupulous groups. Even if it could, arming one side in a
virtual civil war would not be a legitimate, or a prudent foreign
policy.

As Joshua Landis, director of the Center for Middle East Studies at
the University of Oklahoma and an expert on Syria, wrote
in Foreign Policy this month, “Let’s be clear: Washington is
pursuing regime change by civil war in Syria. The United States, Europe,
and the Gulf states want regime change, so they are starving the regime
in Damascus and feeding the opposition.”

George Washington University professor and Middle East expert Marc
Lynch has
argued that “arming the Syrian opposition, would likely spread the
violence and increase the numbers of Syrian dead without increasing the
likelihood of regime collapse.” Also,
as we saw in Libya, “fighting groups will rise in political power,
while those who have advocated nonviolence or who advance political
strategies will be marginalized.”

The potential for this meddling to escalate
the violence and exacerbate the suffering is very, very high, and recent
UN investigations suggest the Syrian rebels have committed
atrocities in recent weeks. The humanitarian concerns in Syria are real,
but military intervention does not offer a compelling alternative,
especially since Washington would undoubtedly be getting involved in a
geopolitical game against Iran, as opposed to for humanitarian concerns.

21.6.12

Muslim Brotherhood are Western Proxies

One would expect allegedly "outspoken" critics of
the US and Israel to represent the antithesis of any joint US-Israeli
foreign policy, especially when it involves mass-murdering large numbers
of fellow Arabs to expand Western hegemony across the Middle East. Yet
the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood has done the exact opposite, after a
long campaign of feigned anti-American, anti-Israel propaganda during
the Egyptian presidential run-up, the
Muslim Brotherhood has joined US, European, and
Israeli calls for an "international" intervention in Syria.

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak recently called for international
intervention in Syria citing the alleged Houla massacre, echoed by
Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood spokesman Mahmoud Ghozlan who stated the
same. The Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood has been involved
heavily, leading in fact, the US, Israeli, Saudi, and Qatari-backed
sectarian violence that has been ravaging Syria for over a year. In a
May 6, 2012 Reuters article it stated:

"Working quietly, the Brotherhood has been
financing Free Syrian Army defectors based in Turkey
and channeling money and supplies to Syria, reviving their base among
small Sunni farmers and middle class Syrians, opposition sources say."

While Reuters categorically fails to explain the "how" behind the
Brotherhood's resurrection, it was revealed in a 2007 New Yorker article
titled, "The
Redirection" by Seymour Hersh, as being directly backed by the US
and Israel who were funneling support through the Saudis so as to not
compromise the "credibility" of the so-called "Islamic" movement. Hersh
revealed that members of the Lebanese Saad Hariri clique, then led by
Fouad Siniora, had been the go-between for US planners and the Syrian
Muslim Brotherhood.

Hersh reports the Lebanese Hariri faction had met
Dick Cheney in Washington and relayed personally the importance of using
the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria in any move against the ruling
government:

"[Walid] Jumblatt then told me that he had met with Vice-President
Cheney in
Washington last fall to discuss, among other issues, the possibility of
undermining Assad. He and his colleagues advised Cheney that, if the
United States does try to move against Syria, members of the Syrian
Muslim Brotherhood would be “the ones to talk to,” Jumblatt said." -The
Redirection, Seymour Hersh

The article would continue by explaining how already in 2007, US and
Saudi backing had begun benefiting the Brotherhood:

"There is evidence that the Administration’s redirection strategy has
already benefitted the Brotherhood. The Syrian National Salvation Front
is a coalition of opposition groups whose principal members are a
faction led by Abdul Halim Khaddam, a former Syrian Vice-President who
defected in 2005, and the Brotherhood. A former high-ranking C.I.A.
officer told me, “The Americans have provided both political and
financial support. The Saudis are taking the lead with financial
support, but there is American involvement.” He said that Khaddam, who
now lives in Paris, was getting money from Saudi Arabia, with the
knowledge of the White House. (In 2005, a delegation of the Front’s
members met with officials from the National Security Council, according
to press reports.) A former White House official told me that the
Saudis had provided members of the Front with travel documents." -The
Redirection, Seymour Hersh

It was warned that such backing would benefit the Brotherhood as a
whole, not just in Syria, and could effect public opinion even as far as
in Egypt where a long battle against the hardliners was fought in order
to keep Egyptian governance secular. Clearly the Brotherhood did not
spontaneously rise back to power in Syria, it was resurrected by US,
Israeli, and Saudi cash, weapons and directives. PR Roll-out of Orchestrated Regional War

To the general public, the violence in Lebanon seems to have "spilled
over" from Syria, with characters like Saad Hariri, a leading figure in
an effort at fueling regional bifurcation between Sunni and Shi'ia
Muslims, being suddenly "involved" in the ongoing violence. To the
general public, because of a willfully deceitful mass media, the Muslim
Brotherhood's sudden backing of US-Euro-Israeli and Gulf State calls for
foreign intervention seems like a spontaneous reaction to the so-called
Houla massacre.

In reality, for those who are informed regarding the true back story of
the geopolitical reordering of the Arab World, it is nothing more than
the public roll-out of an orchestrated conspiracy years in the making,
with each actor having long practiced their roles backstage together
before coming out on stage and being introduced to the audience.

Indeed,
the Muslim Brotherhood and Saad Hariri have been working together with
the United States, Israel, and Saudi Arabia for years. The Muslim
Brotherhood's political resurrection was solely owed to the US-engineered
"Arab Spring" and torrents of cash and backroom diplomatic support.
The US State Department on record had been preparing since
at least as early as 2008, with Egyptian protest leaders flown to
New York, trained,
equipped, and funded courtesy of US taxpayers before being sent
back to destabilize Egypt beginning in 2010 and culminating in the 2011
"Arab Spring."

And while the Muslim Brotherhood is busy feigning hatred and
belligerence toward the US and Israel, they in turn have feigned fear
and displeasure at the Brotherhood's rise amidst political
destabilization the West itself created and perpetuated solely to place
the Brotherhood back in power. This gambit is perhaps best exposed with the
rise and fall of another Western-backed proxy, Egypt's Mohamed
ElBaradei. Those who "hate" most...

In fact, the more unreasonable and frothing one's anti-American,
anti-Israeli rhetoric becomes, the more likely they are in fact working
directly with the West and using such rhetoric as a smoke screen.
Mohamed ElBaradei, for example, attempted to ride the wave of
anti-Western sentiment by regularly pointing out the odds he was at with
America over Iraq and Iran. Israel and the US in turn accused him of
being an "Iranian" agent, and ElBaradei would
regularly threaten to make war with Israel, should he be elected
president of Egypt. We will see just how absurd this entire charade
really is.

Photo:
From left to right, ICG members Shlomo Ben-Ami, Stanley Fischer, Shimon
Peres, and Mohamed ElBaradei. Despite claims that
Mohomed ElBaradei is "anti-Israeli" or "anti-West," it is a documented
fact that he
is indeed an agent of the Wall Street-London corporate-fascist global
oligarchy, and a member of the International Crisis Group which includes
several current and former senior Israeli officials.

Beyond even this evidence, and before the "Arab Spring" even unfolded,
another US corporate-financier funded think-tank, the Council on Foreign
Relations, pointed out the necessity of manipulating public perception
to maneuver client regimes into power. In a March 2010 article titled, "Is
ElBaradei Egypt's Hero?" published in CFR's "Foreign Affairs," it
stated:

"Further, Egypt’s close relationship with the United States has become a
critical and negative factor in Egyptian politics. The opposition has
used these ties to delegitimize the regime, while the government has
engaged in its own displays of anti-Americanism to insulate itself from
such charges. If ElBaradei actually has a reasonable chance of fostering
political reform in Egypt, then U.S. policymakers would best serve his
cause by not acting strongly."

Clearly, both Western and Israeli press not only refrained from "acting
strongly," they feigned immense displeasure at ElBaradei's rise in
Egyptian politics, while simultaneously showering his enemies and
opponents with support to taint them in the eyes of an emotional, and
apparently easily manipulated global public.

In this light it is hard to take ElBaradei's feigned anti-Western
sentiments as anything more than an absolute coordinated deception, to
mask the fact that he indeed is a direct representative of these very
insidious manipulators. Likewise the Muslim Brotherhood is playing a
double game, capitalizing on carefully cultivated hatred verses America
and Israel, while in reality leading sectarian extremists toward
fulfilling rather than balking Western machinations. Not only is this
apparent in the propaganda game played by both the Brotherhood and their
counterparts in Washington, London, Doha, and Tel Aviv, but
demonstratively as the Brotherhood's agenda now overtly converges with
that of the US and Israel verses Syria, as stated would happen in 2007
by Seymour Hersh.

Clearly with regime change on the table since
the first Gulf War during the 1990's, specific calls for regime
change as early as 2002,
and an articulated conspiracy to use sectarian militants to overthrow
Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon and in turn, undermine and destabilize Iran,
on
record since 2007, all hinged on the creation of a front of Western
client-regimes across the Arab World. The US-engineered "Arab Spring"
has demonstratively created such a front, which in turn has
demonstratively contributed to the goal of isolating, undermining, and
violently overthrowing Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.

For the Arab World, it should be clear that the "enemy of my enemy" is
most certainly not "my friend," especially when that "enemy" is the
result of an artificial strategy of tension created by those posing as
"allies."

Sunni Muslims share a common enemy not only with their Shi'ia
neighbors, but with all peoples, races, and religions from Africa to
Asia. That enemy is
Anglo-American imperialism which has perpetuated itself for
centuries by nothing else other than its ability to divide, destroy, and
conquer nations pitted against nations, north verses south, one
religion verses another, one tribe against another. This is how they
subjugated huge swaths of Africa, Central and Southeast Asia, and this
is exactly how they are now conquering the Arab World.

.
.
.
.From organized chaos you can re-order the system according to your dictates.

As has been stated before there are those in Western Intelligence, the idea of which began in London circles, that by installing Islamic Fundamentalists you can control Muslim majority societies far more decisively.......AND that the sum total of ALL these Islamist regimes pose no REAL military threat to Israel given the combined might of Israel/USA/NATO.

ie: Israel is a Oasis of peace, tranquility, rationality, democracy and Western civilization...whilst the Muslim hordes are primitive heathens forever protesting, shouting screaming, waving the Koran and their scimitars......get the picture?

But do we need a world full of permanent war, where the American President makes war/security/Israel his primarily election issue........because of CIA backed proxies installed into power originally.

Apparently, the CIA, Mossad and the Muslim Brotherhood are all close
friends.

All of the people quoted below are controversial, but some of what they
say may be true.

1.
"Former Mossad chief Meir Dagan,
speaking at the 2012 Presidential Conference in Jerusalem, expressed
cautious optimism about the
potential outcomes of the Arab Spring, saying that 'we are in
a very unique position that has never been seen before.'

"Dagan said that 'the radicals in the Arab League are no longer there
and a range of mutual interests that require regional cooperation
provide an incredible opportunity for fostering peaceful relations.'

In
videos released by the Ibn Taymiyyah Media Center, a group of
masked men stand in front of al Qaida-style flags claimed responsibility
for the Sinai incident.

The group dedicated the attack to the CIA's Osama bin Laden. "We present
this blessed invasion ... to the soul of the lion of Islam, the reviver
of jihad, and the raiser of the banner, Sheikh Mujahid Osama bin
Muhammad bin Laden."

"I learned that many of the Nazis that I had been assigned to prosecute
were on the CIA payroll...

"The Muslim Brotherhood was a
fascist organization that was hired by Western intelligence that evolved
over time into what we today know as al-Qaeda...

"In
the 1920s there was a young Egyptian named al Bana. And al Bana formed
this nationalist group called the Muslim Brotherhood. Al Bana was a
devout admirer of Adolph Hitler and wrote to him frequently...

"At the end of World War II, the Muslim Brotherhood was wanted for war
crimes...

"Instead of prosecuting... the Muslim Brotherhood, the British
government hired them...

"What the British did then, they sold the Arab Nazis to the predecessor
of what became the CIA...

"The idea was that we were going to use the Arab Nazis in the Middle
East as a counterweight to the Arab communists...We kept the Muslim
Brotherhood on our payroll...

"Nasser ordered all of the Muslim Brotherhood out of Egypt...

"During the 1950's, the CIA evacuated the Nazis of the Muslim
Brotherhood to Saudi Arabia.

"Now when they arrived in Saudi Arabia, some of the leading lights of
the Muslim Brotherhood like Azzam, became the teachers in the Madrasas,
the religious schools.

"And there they combined the doctrines of Nazism with this weird Islamic
cult, Wahhabiism.

"Everyone thinks that Islam is this fanatical religion, but it is not...

"The Wahhabi cult was condemned as a heresy more than 60 times by the
Muslim nations...

"The Eight Families banking cabal much preferred the mullahs to
the leftists...

"The US was ... helping Islamic
extremists... to exterminate the Iranian left...

"The Israeli Mossad ... in 1978 ... allowed the fundamentalist Hamas to
become the only Palestinian group registered in
Israel...

"The Israelis found Hamas a convenient bludgeon which they could deploy
against Yasser Arafat whose Palestinian Authority had emerged from Fatah
and the PLO, both of which put forth a secular left of center political
agenda based on Arab unity and nationalism...

"The right-wing Israeli Likud uses Hamas to sew division among the
Palestinians...

"The Saudis favor Hamas...

"Many House of Saud members are
members of the secret society Muslim Brotherhood-Benoist-Mechin.

"Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood...

"According to former Mossad case
officer Victor Ostravsky, Mossad
armed the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood with mujahadeenarms from Afghanistan in 1986.

"Mossad even told these Islamic
Jihad terrorists which targets to hit...

"In October 1991, angered at the Bush Sr. Administration’s willingness
to mediate peace talks in Madrid between Israel and the Palestinians,
Ostravsky says Mossad used three Hamas extremists in an attempt to
assassinate Bush in Madrid...

"In 1982 the socialist government in Syria put down a revolt
led by Islamic militants. One of the revolt’s leaders was Abdallah
Azzam, who later supervised the CIA training of mujahadeen in Peshawar...

"Hassan Turabi, leader of the Sudanese military government, is backed by
the leader of that country’s Muslim Brotherhood offshoot known as the
Islamic National Front...

"In the US the Muslim Brotherhood coalesces around Louis Farrakhan and
his Nation of Islam..."

About Me

I have been under state surveillance and covert harassment in the UK since 1985, by MI-5 and their gullible friends where ever they are found, and overt harassment with surveillance since march of 1996, when I submitted my final year law degree dissertation, 'The relationship between the state, the security services and the law'.