Australia. Announcement: Six thousand years of Religious History has been Shattered

Two Australian researchers have unravelled some of the mysteries that have formed civilizations throughout six millennium.

While investigating stories contained in many ancient texts, Ronald Pegg and Eddy Pengelly uncovered evidence of computer technology being described in well known religious stories and classical legends.

They revealed:
Evidence of computer technology described in the Bible.
Documented ‘Angelic Messengers’ identified as technological Time Travellers.
Purpose of visits to past to warn of War.
The future ‘Historical Events’ (Signs) foretold by these ‘messengers’ are now known.
The ‘Sealed Book’ used and cited by these messengers has been identified.
Certain ancient people (now known as ‘prophets’) encountered these Time Messengers.
The Prophets mistakenly regarded these Time Messengers as gods, God, or Angels.
The prophets’ stories of their encounter with ‘Gods or Angels’ became further distorted, and
those supernatural legends, myths, and stories became the basis for Religious Texts.
Over time, compiled pious texts were deemed to be absolute evidence of a supreme God.
Devout worship of the characters portrayed in the misconstrued stories evolved into modern Religions.
Eastern and Western versions of the Creation Story are also based upon Time Messenger encounters.
Nostradamus was visited by a Time Messenger, and was shown and told of future events.

Other Press Releases by Australian internet publisher World Breaking Discoveries include:
- Computer Technology found in Ancient Egypt
- Computer Technology depicted in Egyptian Hieroglyphs
- Australian Time Detectives Unearth the Past
- Religious People and Atheists are both Wrong about God
- Q Source of the Synoptic Gospels Found
- The Creation Myth Exposed
- The Book of Revelations - Finally Understood

An invitation to conduct a Peer Review of 10 years of research and evidence regarding these and many other topics is offered.
Link:WBD Peer Review

Last edited by Eddy_P on Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.

The first three links were about the CD/Aten, which just wasted about six or seven seconds of my life. That's two licks from a tootsie pop - GONE.

Then the fourth and fifth links are nothing but an exact duplicate of this thread's original post, minus the bold face of the names. Reiteration is, again, a waste of my time of my time.

In the sixth link, you're going somewhere. You've got a little psychological stimulation going, but only a little. Of course, now that I think of it, I believe this relavation had come to me some years ago. I choose to believe what I was told to believe. ..Or ..something to that effect.

However, the seventh and eighth links were a short-lived disappointment. As soon as I read about the compact disk, I had had enough. Egyptians worshiped a sun god, modelled after a piece of fecal matter rolled around by a giant ant that ate your skin, as the movies taught me. It was not a burned copy of the Beastie Boys' Greatest Hits. ..Though I wonder how the relation of this article and Intergalactic Planetary would play out?

The final link really steamed my blood. It takes a piece of literature and tells me out right what the meaning is; however, I am not given the original texts to compare and have the opportunity to willingly agree or disagree with the given statements.

And when at the end of this, as a reward I'm given the opportunity to purchase an ebook whose claims are crudely presented, faintly backed (if at all), and presumably forced down my throat like the piece of tripe this is?!

I'm sorry, but the very idea of computer technology in the ancient world more than brushes the fringe--it dives right in!
ANY wild idea may be "proved" by the twisting and turning of words...
For me, accepted, proven thought and ideas--well documented by ancient writing/inscriptions, is the way to go.

Hi.
Has it ever occurred to you that the 'words'* you are defending may have been misinterpreted in the first place, and that what you now perceive as 'twisting the meanings' actually returns the mistranslated and misinterpreted English words back to their original meanings ?

* here I refer to the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek words from the Bible and the Book of Mormon that have been religiously translated and interpreted into English.

The same goes for the interpretation of hieroglyphs.

You may have only viewed the few sample examples from the WBD website - and not have made it through to an extensive study of things Egyptian, including four pages of retranslated glyphs.

Has it ever occurred to you that the 'words'* you are defending may have been misinterpreted in the first place, and that what you now perceive as 'twisting the meanings' actually returns the mistranslated and misinterpreted English words back to their original meanings ?

It's not like ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs were translated over night, you know. Many scholars have dedicated their entire lives to translating the ancient Egyptian scripts. Anyone studying hieroglyphs would likely tell you that hieroglyphs can never be completely understood in one person's lifetime; it's an ongoing study that never ends. Sure, mistakes have been made in the past, and many will likely be found in the future, but to disregard thousands of scholars lifelong works is hugely disrespectful, and completely unjustified. The things you're suggesting, Eddy_P, would turn everything we now know about hieroglyphs on its head. I'm a very open-minded person and I love to entertain new ideas about the ancient Egyptians, but you're completely wrong about this; there was no computer technology in ancient Egypt! If there was, do tell where it is now!

Thank you, DoS. You were much more able than I to express what we both feel!
But, judging by his previous postings, it is a hopeless task to try and change eddy P.'s mind. He's right, and we're wrong. Period...

But, judging by his previous postings, it is a hopeless task to try and change eddy P.'s mind. He's right, and we're wrong. Period...

Oh, yeah. We're definitely the ones that are wrong because we choose to listen to logic! I agree that it's useless trying to convince someone that doesn't even bother to listen to any advice they're given. Many people have tried with Eddy_P - here and at ED, so I notice - but no explanations ever seem to work. I just couldn't help but give it a shot.

there was no computer technology in ancient Egypt! If there was, do tell where it is now!

Is it that you believe I am saying that the ancient Egyptians had their own version of computers and compact disks ?If so, I can see why you ask “where is it now!”To clarify things, the ancient Egyptian did not have their own versions of computers and compact disks.

The compact disk and computer parts they depict plus the accounts of the contents of certain compact disks were shown to them by travellers in time (being the “angels” cited in the Bible).

If I was only quoting Egyptian sources for this ‘theory’, then on its own, it does seem a little way off the main street.But the contents of cds plus the “messengers” who showed them have been documented in dozens of ancient texts.

Scholars demand that concise and relevant evidence be presented from as many sources as possible. The scientific tern is Criterion of Multiple Attestation.“Put simply, whenever historians are trying to build up a picture of some event or person from the past, they begin by sorting out how many independent sources attest to that event or person. The more independent sources there are, the more confident historians feel about reconstructing the past. This is generally known as the criterion of multiple attestation.”

Ronald Pegg adhered to this method and found the imagery from certain modern cd-roms described in over 25 different and diverse cultures spanning over 5,000 years.

The things you're suggesting, Eddy_P, would turn everything we now know about hieroglyphs on its head.

Yes. Its called the ‘End Time Judgement’ in the Bible, and by similar terms in other ancient texts.
It shows that what was believed and perceived to be divine beings (ie. the Egyptian Gods) - were not of a divine source.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum