If the power elites didn’t need the consent of the public to rule, they wouldn’t have to lie constantly about their reasons for war. What if its 1984 and you don't know it because you haven't recognized who big brother is yet.

If the power elites didn’t need the consent of the public to rule, they wouldn’t have to lie constantly about their reasons for war. What if its 1984 and you don't know it because you haven't recognized who big brother is yet.

Monday, July 30, 2018

this piece explores the alleged differences in 'our' leaders of 'our democracy';

Former US President Barack Obama was in South Africa last week for
the centennial anniversary marking the birth of the late Nelson Mandela.
Obama delivered a speech warning about encroaching authoritarianism among nations and the “rise of strongman politics”.
Coming on the heels of the summit in Helsinki between Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, media reports assumed that Obama was taking a swipe at these two leaders for supposed growing authoritarianism.Obama’s casting of the “strongman” as a foreboding enemy to
democracy is a variant of the supposed threat of “populism” that Western
political establishments also seem concerned about.
Trump, Putin, Turkey’s Erdogan, Italy’s Salvini, Victor Orban in
Hungary and Sebastian Kurz in Austria, among many others, are all lumped
together as “strongman politics”, “populists” or “authoritarians”.
Here we are not trying to defend the above-mentioned political leaders or to make out that they are all virtuous democrats.The point rather is to debunk the false narrative that
there is some kind of dichotomy in modern politics between those who,
on one hand, are supposedly virtuous, liberal, democratic,
multilateralists, and on the other hand, the supposedly sinister
“strongman”, “authoritarian”, or “populist”.