Jobsinlaw.ca is Canada’s go-to legal career site. By matching employers and recruiters with legal professionals, www.jobsinlaw.ca provides a cost-effective recruitment solution. Law firms, in-house legal departments and public sector organizations across Canada can find lawyers, legal professionals or legal support staff at all levels of qualification with jobsinlaw.ca.

The Lexpert CCCA Corporate Counsel Directory & Yearbook is a joint endeavour of the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association and Lexpert. It provides the most extensive listing of corporate counsel in Canada.

Whether your matter is to do with criminal, family, employment, property, or immigration law, FindLaw.ca’s Lawyer Directory will help you connect with the right lawyers to help you with your legal issues.

The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory comprises the results of an extensive peer survey. This comprehensive guide to legal talent in Canada identifies both leading lawyers and law firms from across the country.

Innovatio Awards celebrate in-house counsel, both individuals and teams, who have found ways to show leadership by becoming more efficient, innovative and creative in meeting the needs of their organizations within the Canadian legal markets

Presented by Lexpert, the prestigious Rising Stars Awards Gala honours winners from across Canada and welcomes law firm and in-house leaders and distinguished guests to celebrate and network with others who are at the top of the legal profession

The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory comprises the results of an extensive peer survey. This comprehensive guide to legal talent in Canada identifies both leading lawyers and law firms from across the country.

The Lexpert CCCA Corporate Counsel Directory & Yearbook is a joint endeavour of the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association and Lexpert. It provides the most extensive listing of corporate counsel in Canada.

Paralegal looks to stop unlicensed agents at LTB

A Cornwall, Ont. paralegal has brought a court application to try to stop property managers who are not licensed to practise law from providing legal services at the Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board.

Paralegal James Moak brought a notice of application in the Ontario Superior Court after years of trying to get the tribunal to deal with the problem.

Moak and others who practise in the area say they have seen many third-party managers draft documents and appear before the board. This is highly problematic, he says, as it means members of the public would have no recourse if these representatives were negligent in their case.

“The problem is that you cannot practise law unless you have a licence, whether as a paralegal or as a lawyer, and that’s not being addressed,” Moak says.

In his application, Moak asked for the court to make determinations and declarations about third-party managers, as he says the LTB has failed to control its own process.

Moak has written to both the Law Society of Ontario and the tribunal to try to push either to look into the issue, but he says he has not seen any resulting action. In a 2014 decision in The Law Society of Upper Canada v. Chiarelli, the Court of Appeal upheld an injunction barring a property manager from appearing before the LTB on behalf of clients because he was not a landlord, lawyer or paralegal.

Despite this decision, paralegals and lawyers say the problem is still pervasive across the province.

And since Chiarelli, Moak has been pushing for action on the issue.

“Something has to happen here because non-licensed people are thumbing their nose at the rules about who may provide legal services and it has to stop,” he says.

Under the Law Society Act, only lawyers and paralegals who have been licensed by the LSO are allowed to provide legal services to the public, except for some who fall under specific exemptions.

Moak says that if the law society is supposed to protect the public, there are thousands of tenants and landlords who are not being protected, and that the law society needs to deal with the issue.

LSO spokeswoman Sue Tonkin would not confirm whether the law society is investigating the issue, as complaints and investigations are kept confidential until they result in a regulatory proceeding.

“When the Law Society becomes aware of an individual who may be practising illegally, we may send the person a ‘cease and desist’ letter, which is often successful.

“If this doesn’t work, we conduct a thorough investigation, which could potentially lead to a court injunction, fine or other more serious consequences,” she says.

Ottawa lawyer Michael Thiele, who practises in the LTB, says that having to deal with unqualified representatives makes cases at the board longer for lawyers. It also means that cases that should settle are drawn out, he says.

Thiele says the LTB has done little to stop real estate agents and property managers from representing third parties for money. This undercuts paralegals, he says.

“If you sit at the Landlord and Tenant Board on any given day, you can find people who are sneaking through the system, often with a nudge-nudge, wink-wink,” Thiele says.

He says the board will only make the enquiry into an individual’s qualifications when the opposing party objects and brings a motion to disqualify them. But other than in those instances, they allow anyone to represent parties, he says.

Thiele adds that the effect of having non-licensed individuals appearing at the board — often on behalf of landlords against tenants — is that the Residential Tenancies Act is being used in ways in which it is not intended to be used.

Donna Mrvaljevic, a spokeswoman for the LTB, says the board asks representatives to include their law society number if they are filing an application on behalf of someone but that the absence of that number does not necessarily mean they do not have standing before the board.

She pointed to an exemption for in-house legal services providers, which, she says, property managers often claim when appearing before the LTB.

Mrvaljevic adds that the definition of a landlord in the Residential Tenancies Act is also very broad and includes the owner of a rental unit or anyone who permits occupancy of a rental unit.

“Thus, unlicensed individuals who satisfy this definition or employees of corporations that satisfy this definition may be permitted to appear at the LTB,” she says.

The LTB receives 80,000 applications each year. Given this high volume of cases, Mrvaljevic says, it is not practical for the board to conduct an inquiry into every unlicensed representative’s claimed exemption.

“However, although not tracked, there have been instances when unlicensed representatives have been refused permission to appear before the LTB,” she says.

We can choose who we want

Bill soroka 2018-03-12 06:58

0

As a landlord I can choose who I want to represent me. I choose my sister to represent me. She is not paid and do not have a licence .
She won all my cases so far. She does her research well and she knows the problem that I have wuth my tenants.
I already losing thousands of dollars to dead beat tenants. Why lost more money on legal fees to people like you.

RELATED ARTICLES

The Law Society of Ontario’s recent decision to further cull the number of benchers at Convocation means that several longtime members will lose the rights either to speak or vote in the next few months.

DIGITAL EDITION

Sponsored Links

Law Times Poll

Ontario lawyers and bencher contenders recently said they are hoping that new proposed rules for alternative business structures limit the corporate influence on lawyers. Will this issue be something that factors into your voting for the upcoming election for benchers at the Law Society of Ontario?

Yes, this issue will influence how I vote.

No, I think there are other issues of greater significance facing the profession.