gold has always been useless in this game, and even when trading was implemented, a new currency was released instead of using the currency we already have got in the game, so i made this suggestions of giving gold items a better use in game.

...? There was no currency "already in the game". Gold was never meant to be a currency. It'd be very boring and unoriginal if it was. What's with so many people programming themselves that gold needs to be currency?

Mark for Death - Sure.

Arcane - Fair enough.Caustic Blow - I don't get it, this turns mobs into mini creepers?Delrium - Isn't this the same as Blindness?Armorer - So armor pieces are just materializing on nearby tamed animals and whatever? Or are you just talking about an armor rating?

Tunneler - Seems like a lackluster mashup of Efficiency and Unbreaking.Fertile - I'd say this is overpowered, but the durbility of gold cancels that out so... sure.

Hammer Strike - Enchantments should always be pure positives, not a mix between negative and positive. This also doesn't make much sense for something being a "Hammer Strike"?

Spectral Arrow - I'd say scrap this one. It's overpowered since you can fire through walls but can't see where it's going anyway?

Sniper - I think "Range" might be a better name, but still a good idea.

Pierce - This almost ruins the point of armor existing. I think extra damage enchantments do the job enough.

Outrage - Nice.

Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack

Yeah, that guy in the avatar is me. I'm *that* strange. It happens. Sometimes people act like that. Just go with it. I can offer help with suggestions even before you post them - NOT make your suggestions - but help you with them.

you came up with a lot of great ideas, but some of them are too over powered.

some support.

Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack

96% of teens won't stand up for God. Put this on your page if you're part of the 4% who will.

..............__............ Put this
..............[--]........... On your
........___[--]___...... Page if
.......[___ -- ___]..... You're
..............[--]............ not Ashamed
..............[--]............ To tell
..............[--]............ Others that
..............[--]............ You are
..............[--]............ A Christian

...? There was no currency "already in the game". Gold was never meant to be a currency. It'd be very boring and unoriginal if it was. What's with so many people programming themselves that gold needs to be currency?

yep, but i mentioned that its kinda OP, i just keep it as an ideaDelrium - Isn't this the same as Blindness?

its a bit differentArmorer - So armor pieces are just materializing on nearby tamed animals and whatever? Or are you just talking about an armor rating?

it just increases their armor its no complex

Tunneler - Seems like a lackluster mashup of Efficiency and Unbreaking.

yeah, but the purpose of it is making tunnels easier, rather than collecting oresFertile - I'd say this is overpowered, but the durbility of gold cancels that out so... sure.

Hammer Strike - Enchantments should always be pure positives, not a mix between negative and positive. This also doesn't make much sense for something being a "Hammer Strike"?

who said they should? its OP, it could destroy your enemies expensive armor so quickly it must have a negative, also i mentioned in this post that the new enchantments are supposed to make the tools have unique uses in place of regular ones; because golden equipment are already too weak and even enchanting them to make them stronger is senseless since you could get stronger weapons with lesser enchantments

Leader Strike - A bit useless...

Assassin - Meh, above average.

Storm - Neat.

Counter Blade - Interesting.

Ender Ender - Terrible name, sorry.

thought of it, but just sounds funny and in its placeExecutioner - Don't understand this one.

its simple. if targets HP is equal or less your (attack + a specific modifier) the target dies immediately, making the last hit stronger.

EX. if targets HP is 5 and your sword deals 3 damage and its enchanted with executioner II ( 3 [base damage] + 2 [executioner II modifier] ) target will die immediately. but if targets HP is 6 and you have hit him with the same sword, it will deal only 3 damage, because targets HP doesn't exceed the sum of the formula above.

Spectral Arrow - I'd say scrap this one. It's overpowered since you can fire through walls but can't see where it's going anyway?

i also said scrap it, i keep it as an idea.

Sniper - I think "Range" might be a better name, but still a good idea.

whatever.

Pierce - This almost ruins the point of armor existing. I think extra damage enchantments do the job enough.

yep, but i mentioned that its kinda OP, i just keep it as an ideaIf you know for a fact an idea is unbalanced, why post it? It gives you nothing in return except for that idea to be put down and criticized.

its a bit differentIt's a complete waste of effort to program in a more complex version of a potion effect that already exists.

yeah, but the purpose of it is making tunnels easier, rather than collecting oresThis enchantment is completely pointless. If I want to make a tunnel, I'll just use a better pickaxe instead?

who said they should? its OP, it could destroy your enemies expensive armor so quickly it must have a negative, also i mentioned in this post that the new enchantments are supposed to make the tools have unique uses in place of regular ones; because golden equipment are already too weak and even enchanting them to make them stronger is senseless since you could get stronger weapons with lesser enchantmentsWe're spending XP we took a lot of time to get for purely positive things on our tools and armor, we're not spending hard earned XP on "half good half bad" things. There's also no reason that a sword enchantment is affecting our armor. That's just a sloppy idea.

its simple. if targets HP is equal or less your (attack + a specific modifier) the target dies immediately, making the last hit stronger.Not a very unique idea. It's not a big difference from just crit-jump spamming something with a strong sword.

i also said scrap it, i keep it as an idea.I have no idea what you're getting out of the whole "keep as an idea" thing.

Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack

Yeah, that guy in the avatar is me. I'm *that* strange. It happens. Sometimes people act like that. Just go with it. I can offer help with suggestions even before you post them - NOT make your suggestions - but help you with them.

about OP ones, i posted them before i realized they are OP, also i dont care about ppl who criticize them, they are just not giving attention

you are not making the game, you are not who decide the effort and that stuff, as a user you care only about the idea, support it if you like or not if you don't..just like if mojang hasn't wasted a lot of time making stuff that are not "worth the effort"

the tunneler is not pointless, its much stronger than a "better pickaxe" its meant to be extremely powerful against non-ore stone blocks, so its used to make tunnels with high efficiency and durability, but its not good too mine ores.

also, the hammer strike is not half good half bad, if it didnt get this reduction it will be OP, its weakened to drop down from Over Powered to powerful.

You misunderstood the context of the "effort" thing. No, we aren't part of Mojang, but we don't need to be to understand that's there's no point in adding something that's already there. That's like building a house perfectly, then tearing it all down and wasting your own time doing the same thing all over again but replacing one board of wood just because it smells different.

No. You should take the time to get what people are saying before you accuse them of... "not paying attention". You've been wording a lot of stuff incorrectly.

You're playing two sides at once and you're bouncing back and forth between the two. You're telling people that they're not Mojang and they shouldn't concern themselves with how something is implemented, however here you are treating most of your ideas as if they're just right for the game. If we can't judge if an idea is worthy, why do you? Like Theriasis said, pick a side and stick with it.

1- about the first point, the difference between delerium and blindness is bigger than just the smell of the smelly wooden plank so its not like it, if the difference was actually this small i would agree with you, also its not as big as a house, lets say you made a nail polish and you messed a small part so you decided to remove it with acetone and drew it back.

2-by "not paying attention" i meant the part where you said people would criticize the enchantments that i said about "just keeping it as an idea" , because the reason they criticize my suggestion is actually not paying attention in reading.

3-no im not playing 2 sides, there is a misunderstanding. i said people are not mojang and they, so they wont judge if the idea makes lag or worth the effort, neither me! but we as users all we care about is having a good idea that is balanced and fits in the game without making the game get laggy.

i didn't say that people cant judge the ideas themselves, if you think something is OP, or needs a change whatever it was, or you have a comment about the suggestions or you have a suggestion adding to it. clear now ?

1- about the first point, the difference between delerium and blindness is bigger than just the smell of the smelly wooden plank so its not like it, if the difference was actually this small i would agree with you, also its not as big as a house, lets say you made a nail polish and you messed a small part so you decided to remove it with acetone and drew it back.

The purpose of both delerium and blindness is to blind players. Your only defense was "it's slightly different". Yes, exactly, that's what the problem is. What's so special about adding in another potion effect for the exact same purpose as the first one? That's what the house analogy was.

2-by "not paying attention" i meant the part where you said people would criticize the enchantments that i said about "just keeping it as an idea" , because the reason they criticize my suggestion is actually not paying attention in reading.

That's another thing you read wrong. He wasn't questioning what you meant, he was questioning why you were doing it. If you know an idea is unbalanced or pointless, there's no sense in keeping it up for display. Just let the bad ideas drop and disappear, because all they do is hurt the integrity of a suggestion.

-no im not playing 2 sides, there is a misunderstanding. i said people are not mojang and they, so they wont judge if the idea makes lag or worth the effort, neither me! but we as users all we care about is having a good idea that is balanced and fits in the game without making the game get laggy.i didn't say that people cant judge the ideas themselves, if you think something is OP, or needs a change whatever it was, or you have a comment about the suggestions or you have a suggestion adding to it. clear now ?

It seems rather pointless to comment on anything since you aren't improving or changing anything based on any reception. A lot of those enchantments are copies of existing ones.

The purpose of both delerium and blindness is to blind players. Your only defense was "it's slightly different". Yes, exactly, that's what the problem is. What's so special about adding in another potion effect for the exact same purpose as the first one? That's what the house analogy was.

That's another thing you read wrong. He wasn't questioning what you meant, he was questioning why you were doing it. If you know an idea is unbalanced or pointless, there's no sense in keeping it up for display. Just let the bad ideas drop and disappear, because all they do is hurt the integrity of a suggestion.

It seems rather pointless to comment on anything since you aren't improving or changing anything based on any reception. A lot of those enchantments are copies of existing ones.

1- to me the difference makes sense, if you don't agree thats just your opinion, every body has got his opinion

2- dont tell me what to do with my thread. i said i know its unbalanced and i am keeping it as an idea, it could be changed, rebalanced or could be used to inspire another idea, what i was saying is that i dont care about people criticizing it because i already said its scrapped.

3- actually i rebalanced many enchantments depending on the opinions of the comments, if i didn't agree with one of them and didn't apply his idea to my thread it doesn't mean that im "not changing anything based on any reception"

also what are those "lot" of enchantments that are copies? only a few of them are similar to existing ones.

1- to me the difference makes sense, if you don't agree thats just your opinion, every body has got his opinion

You're taking the easy way out. Going "well we'll just agree to disagree" does nothing in the end, and just showcases laziness. Saying "Well this idea makes sense to me" is absolutely meaningless. I think it's safe to say you just ran out of responses on the topic.

2- dont tell me what to do with my thread. i said i know its unbalanced and i am keeping it as an idea, it could be changed, rebalanced or could be used to inspire another idea, what i was saying is that i dont care about people criticizing it because i already said its scrapped.

You are being so confusing. Apart from the fact that you want your ideas in the game, what is your purpose of this thread? Do you want people to be on board with your idea? Or are you just posting a thread and whatever happens, happens?

Also, how are people gonna know which idea is still in the ball game, and which is "just left as an idea"? In the point of view of the visitor to this thread, all of them are ideas still in the game.

You're taking the easy way out. Going "well we'll just agree to disagree" does nothing in the end, and just showcases laziness. Saying "Well this idea makes sense to me" is absolutely meaningless. I think it's safe to say you just ran out of responses on the topic.

You are being so confusing. Apart from the fact that you want your ideas in the game, what is your purpose of this thread? Do you want people to be on board with your idea? Or are you just posting a thread and whatever happens, happens?

Also, how are people gonna know which idea is still in the ball game, and which is "just left as an idea"? In the point of view of the visitor to this thread, all of them are ideas still in the game.

dude did you even read the entire conversation? or did you even read the post? because non of this makes sense. and you all are taking my words just as if i am pushing my opinions into your face, i'm just saying my opinion.

1- no i'm not, he said that he thinks that delerium is same as blindness, what do you want me to replay to be not "absolutely meaningless" ? its just a dead end, we disagree about a single point and there is nothing to say more about it, his opinion is welcome, but my opinion is different.

2- no i't not, what i meant by "its my thread" is that he doesn't have to tell me how to assort it and what to remove and what to add, as he said "If you know for a fact an idea is unbalanced, why post it?[/b]" . i made it clear that these "just left as an idea" are somehow OP, and they are scrapped; but im not willing to delete them, they might be useful later. he doesn't have to tell me to what to do with my thread.

3- i wrote down "just keeping it as an idea" on the scrapped ones, so people could know "which idea is still in the ball game, and which is just left as an idea" but yeah its clear that you didn't even read the post.

I support most of this! With delirium, I would sudjest maybe make it like blindness,or the darkness like in twilight forest? (i'm not sure if their the same) and add a block texture flip. You know, so nothing looks correct, you might think your looking at TNT, but it's actually your chest full of stuff? Trying to collect it/Light it on fire won't be to fun : P

Alright, ice000breaker... You want to keep the rejected ideas on your just in case something comes up? Well, if that helps you out in the end which in turn helps your suggestion, then go for it. I respect that, it's your thread and you're defending it will. However, can I suggest that you edit your first post to label what's rejected? Otherwise, any newcomer to this thread will not realize what's been scratched off the drawing board and critizse it because he thinks the rejected idea is in the ball park.

Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack

Yeah, that guy in the avatar is me. I'm *that* strange. It happens. Sometimes people act like that. Just go with it. I can offer help with suggestions even before you post them - NOT make your suggestions - but help you with them.

Alright, ice000breaker... You want to keep the rejected ideas on your just in case something comes up? Well, if that helps you out in the end which in turn helps your suggestion, then go for it. I respect that, it's your thread and you're defending it will. However, can I suggest that you edit your first post to label what's rejected? Otherwise, any newcomer to this thread will not realize what's been scratched off the drawing board and critizse it because he thinks the rejected idea is in the ball park.

Firstly gold isn't useless (e.g quicker mining witth pickaxe) but I do think it could have some more creativity to it.

Support

yeah its quicker, put for a very limited amount of uses, also it is not very much faster than diamond, its just faster with 0.05 second, so the low durability is not worth it, as well it cant mine ores.