Pages

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Exposing The Judicial Niggard's

Before we go any
further, and you delve into reading this blog post I wrote: I hope you don't
mind, but let me clear my throat, and or make a few things clear.

So that no one takes
immediate offense to this posts title let me define the context of its
meaning. I have already established that
I am African-American, and just because of my skin tone, I am not the first pot
to call the kettle black, so to speak.

But when one is
stingy, miserly, and stubborn in the due administration of the law, I must call
it as I see it. Niggardly administration
of the law, that's what I am talking about here folks. And in this second round, nothing will
change. As always I will strive to
present my averments based on facts and the law.

Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary defines
"niggardly" as: "1.
grudgingly mean about spending or granting." When one references
this source a photo of the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey, and or District Judge Noel L. Hillman and U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen
M. Williams, will not be found. But…

One has been chosen
to expose these "Judicial Niggard's," relay the facts ,and proof's so
that John and Jane Q. Public may form their own opinions based upon said facts
and the application of the law.

Please, if I may, I
can not for the life within me determine how a word as defined above has
transcended to become an epithet and or label of scorn to the African-American
Community. How could one race bearing
the scars of the whip, be said to grudgingly grant his or her labor, or be mean
when calling the whip-cracker, "Cracker?" Yet to remove some of the pain of the
lashes of the whip and of the cutting of
the tongue, this African-American community converts it into a coveted term
that when used within the community can depending upon tone, relate
dissatisfaction, to expressions of endearment. i.e. "Earl, that's my
nigga."

Okay, thank you for
letting me put that out there, back to the "Judicial Niggards." Ask any lawyer and they will tell you that no
judge has the hubris to openly tell an African-American lawyer, "Nigger
please." In the context of,
"you can't possible expect me to rule according to your argument, when the
"good ole boy's" say otherwise.

This is the
situation we face in civil action 08-cv-02407.
Judge Noel L. Hillman and his band of judicial niggard's have hubris
"out-the-ass" but instead of having the balls to stand on the law
they will hide behind Hillman's and William's absolute immunity, plus pray that
no Honorable judicial officer reads between the lines of their (JSHIT) to see
that they are technically saying "Nigger Please," as I requested that
they have the balls to do within my cover letter to Judge Williams dated
8/17/2009. [See Dkt #32, averment #6 @ page 1-2]

The cove letter to
Judge Williams should have alerted this band that plaintiff Hickson was not
niggardly in any way shape or application of the word. I now proceed in that same vein to share
with you how I have come to the firm conclusion that I am dealing with a band
of Judicial Niggard's hell bent on their practice of Judicial Stealthy
Hubristic Injustice Tactics, which depend upon the age old legal maxim:
"Ab assuetis non fit injuria."
Which translates to: "no injury is done by things long acquiesces
in."

Hence, I will not
acquiesce in niggardly behavior. I will
expose those that have a proclivity towards being judicial niggard's, and I
will further share all the facts and law's that I base my averments upon. No "Bud" but here we go…

Within the next
series of post I will share with you my basis in fact and law as to how Judge's
Noel L. Hillman, Karen M. Williams, and their two "liars for hire,"
Christopher C. Mauro and DAG, Kathleen M. Bartus exhibit and reveal what can
only be inferred as proclivities towards being "judicially
niggardly."

"Summary
judgment is inappropriate if there remains in the case a genuine issue as to
any material fact. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)."

Man! Do I have some
genuine issues of material facts to show and tell, so please stay tuned for
part two, where I will set before you the documentary proof's that the above
wrongdoer's are operating contrary to the law.

So please continue to tell a friend or two
about this cause. They don't have to be lawyers or law students, just those
concerned about their Constitutional Rights and the integrity of their Court's
and it's judicial officers. Oh and I won't tell "who let the dogs out."

Thank you for
viewing, and I hope you appreciate the time that I was away researching and
would have it no other way. He's
Baaaack!