Antidepressant withdrawal can be a hit or a miss

In an article on antidepressant withdrawal published online April 7, The New York Times invited readers to describe their experiences coming off the drugs. More than 8800 people responded - teenagers, college students, new mothers, empty-nesters, retirees.

Readers described their withdrawal experiences; people who wanted to stop taking the drugs and had succeeded or failed.

Dozens did write in to say the drugs had been lifesaving.

“You fail to acknowledge that mood disorders can be lifelong, debilitating diseases requiring lifelong medical treatment,” Rachel S of New York wrote.

The volume and diversity of the responses painted a picture of how modern antidepressants, beginning with Prozac in 1987, have percolated through our culture and shaped public understanding of mental health. These stories traced sharp demographic fault lines: readers of different generations came to antidepressants, and tried to quit them, for different reasons.

Readers in my age group and older (I’m 58) often came of age in an era in which depression was considered somehow a lapse in character. These readers typically reported having started on Prozac or one of its early competitors - Paxil, Zoloft - very often after a major setback like divorce, or the loss of a job, spouse or child.

“My GP put me on Zoloft 28 years ago to deal with my husband’s cancer diagnosis,” wrote Carole Wilson, 74, of Iowa. Her husband has since died. “I have cut down from 200 milligrams to 100, but when I go lower I get horrible side effects, like nausea, jumpiness, crying a lot which I never do. I’m nearly 75; at this point I will continue because I cannot go through the withdrawal.”

James Midkiff, 75, of West Virginia, wrote: “I was sole caretaker for my dying wife and was a law enforcement officer and under a great deal of stress.”

Midkiff said he tapered off Lexapro gradually, about a month ago, “but I am having withdrawal symptoms of shaking, panic attacks, flu-like symptoms, nausea, fatigue, night sweats, tingling and numbness in arms and legs.”

Hundreds of others, in their 60s and 70s, told The Times similar stories about starting a prescription in the wake of terrible loss. The drugs helped ease the emotional turmoil initially, many said.

Their reasons for wanting to stop taking them were rooted in part in the understanding that antidepressants were supposed to be a short-term solution, a bridge over troubled waters. But by the mid-1990s, drug-makers had convinced government regulators that when taken long term, the medications sharply reduced risk of relapse in people with chronic, recurrent depression.

Thus began the era of indefinite or open-ended prescribing, and not just for the most severe cases of depression. The change in practice roughly coincided with the promotion of the “chemical imbalance” theory of depression: marketers and some researchers implied that antidepressants corrected deficits in brain levels of serotonin, a neurotransmitter.

The theory has scant basis. No one knows the underlying biology of depression or any mood disorder. But that shift - along with a change in federal regulations, in 1997, allowing drug-makers to advertise directly to consumers - helped undermine the stigma associated with depression and mood disorders generally.

Depression, anxiety and bipolar disorder came out of the closet, if gingerly, and the generation that came of age during this time - people now in their 40s - did so in a culture that no longer automatically presumed depression was a character flaw.

The condition had some biological basis, it was felt, and antidepressants became a vastly popular option.

In their responses, many readers in this age group were much more likely than older readers to cite specific psychiatric diagnoses: social anxiety, panic disorder, PTSD, as well as depression. And their decisions to taper off were less tied to the presumption that the drugs are short-term bridges; most cited practical concerns like lingering side effects (sexual dysfunction is common, as is weight gain), pregnancy or the passing of postpartum despair.

“When I became pregnant I chose to stop taking Effexor because I was uncomfortable using it during pregnancy,” wrote Katie Slattery, 39, of Florida. “When I stopped cold turkey, I felt extremely unwell and had to go back on and wean off slowly. I would break open my pill capsules and reduce my dose by one milligram at a time every couple of days.

“It was a lengthier process, but it prevented the dizziness, headache and fogginess I felt when I originally stopped.”

Nearly 1000 young people in their 20s or younger responded to The Times’ invitation. They did not come of age during the rise of long-term use - their parents did, and often it was their parents who decided the medications could help them. - The New York Times