The sporadic musings of a middle aged man who isn't exactly happy with the direction America is taking today....

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." ~~Thomas Jefferson

"Who will protect us from those who protect us?"

Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. ~ Thomas Jefferson

"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." ~~Goethe

22 December 2012

A debate...

This is the transcript of a "debate" that took place between me and "Commenter 2" this afternoon regarding an internet news article on banning "assault weapons". It was somewhere in the middle of the comments section following the article. The writer, "commenter 2", is apparently a Liberal and claims to be a veteran of the US military. He doesn't believe that anyone outside of Law Enforcement and the Military should be able to possess "assault weapons". His thought process is that of a typical Liberal, though he hasn't made any ad hominem attacks against me and I didn't notice any made by him against other commenters. Perhaps there is such a thing as a polite Liberal?

The comments in their entirety were typical for such a post. Some very thoughtful and factual with some others obviously based on nothing but emotion. Some of the comments were dog-shit crazy, but that's pretty typical, too. It was interesting...

~~~~~~

Commenter 1:

I see automobile fatalities are up 7.1% so far this year over last year.
Congress should ban all assault automobiles with high capacity gas tanks, don't
you agree?

Commenter 2:

We have regulations and restrictions on cars, we require seatbelts and we
require the manufacturers to make cars more inherently safe. WE require every
single car driver to be licensed and to be insured, We have laws that take away
driving privileges for infractions and we have laws that restrict who can
drive.

We have almost none of these same things for guns. Yes, we should
regulate and restrict guns at least like we do for cars.

Blue:

And still, with all of these regulations, 33,000 Americans died violent deaths
in automobile accidents last year.

Commenter 2:

Which is down dramatically from 45,520 in 2005.
Do you have a point?

Blue:

Absolutely.

Nearly a third of those "accidents" were caused by impaired or distracted driving. You know, drivers under the influence of alcohol or drugs or drivers distracted by cell phones or other electronic media within their vehicle. A few more were caused by other distractions such as screaming children, conversations with passengers, etc.

Of the 32,883 deaths by auto accident in 2010, 1539 of them were children under the age of 16. (I wonder how many of those children died at the hands of a careless, distracted, or impaired parent?) Virtually 100% of these deaths were preventable, yet there is no obvious outrage over them.

51% of those violently killed in automobile accidents in 2010 were not following the regulations when they died, because they were not wearing seatbelts (Source: NTSB). Other contributing factors, such as alcohol and drug impairment, are also against the rules, yet many more died because they failed to follow these rules. Most of these drivers took the required training and tests and were legally licensed to drive. Most of them had the required insurance. Yet they are dead.

Apparently, violent death by automobile is acceptable. Simply a fact of life.

Gun homicides have declined in this country by a similar percentage over a similar period of time. Further, they have declined by fully half since 1990, a far greater percentage of decline than automobile deaths.

Total homicides by rifle in the US in 2010 were 358. Homicides by shotgun were 373. Hands, fists, or feet were the cause of death in 745 homicides and knives were used in 1704 homicides. Of the homicides committed by rifle, "assault weapons" were but a small fraction of the total, a number that the FBI calls "statistically insignificant". 6009 homicides were committed with handguns and 2035 homicides were committed by "unknown types" of firearms. 1772 homicides were committed by "other weapons" (Weapons that do not fit any of the categories listed above. Weapons like the bow and arrow used by Christopher Krumm to incapacitate his father in a college classroom earlier this month before finishing him off with a knife to the chest. Christopher was apparently angry at his father for passing the Asperger's gene on to him)

The vast majority of the homicides cited above were committed by people other than "lawful gun owners". The homicides of approximately 1000 children under the age of 16 are included in this data. (Source: FBI Uniform Crime Report and DOJ Homicide Data. Please feel free to use Google and verify.)

Any preventable death is a sad occurrence. Any preventable death of a child is a tragedy. A person killed in an automobile accident is just as dead as a person killed by a gun, yet there is no massive public outrage over violent automobile deaths.

Simply put, my point is that the people screaming for "assault weapon" bans are doing so using arguments based purely on emotion with little regard for facts. Most of the screamers are simply ignorant and are merely repeating the misinformation broadcast by the media without realizing that the media has an agenda and without checking the veracity of what is being reported.

The "assault weapon" is not the weapon of choice for homicides in this country. In fact, the "assault weapon" is used less frequently than any other weapon in the commission of homicides in America.

The "assault weapon" is but a small fraction of the weapon class (rifles) that is used least frequently in the commission of homicide in this country.

~~~~~~

Anyway, it has been several hours and I have had no further response from Commenter 2.

What seems simple and logical (as well as being verifiable) to you and me is apparently unfathomable to others, even in the face of irrefutable factual data compiled by the government that they love, trust, and depend upon. I find that kind of hinky.

8 comments:

I love it when the "I was/am in the military and think no one should be allowed these weapons" There is one of those in every unit it seems like. Still, my response to them all is roughly the same. You carried the best weapons available to you when you were in the line of duty to keep you alive, why would anyone with out the extensive training, body armor, and other equipment have less of a right to the simplest of things to make them more safe?

I usually just read the news articles and the comments. Always the comments. I don't often comment because myself because I end up getting involved in arguments with people who will not change their mind no matter how clearly and factually you state your case. It gets frustrating.

I used to go onto the forums to bait Liberals, but my wife tells me that it's mean, so I quit that :)

Blue,say Brother I don't guess the Liberals don't understand that they have ALREADY taken our Assault weapons unless we pony up for a class 3 permit and big money for the guns.These lame ass semiauto's are not Military assault weapons! But like ya say give me a 5000 lb truck 454 I can be a stone cold killer!

About Me

7 1/2 years on active duty with the US Army, 1972-1979, mostly in Germany. Oh yeah, do you remember the "Cold War"?
5 years with the USAR. 1982-1987. Light Infantry. Queen of Battle.
I believe that most Americans today have no idea what it means to be American. We have lost our identity. We have traded our "exceptionalism" for "political correctness". We are just another country that has been spoiled by technology and the worship of material things.
We no longer practice the concepts of personal responsibility and personal accountability. We are only too willing to let Big Brother, our government, take care of us.
We have lost sight of what The Founders set out to create when they wrote The Constitution. Saddest of all, we no longer thirst for liberty.

Total Pageviews

Links to this site

Why?

"Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue—one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice—and it is: Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or [3] the sword — for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die."

--Osama Bin Laden

Legal

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material such as articles, video snippets and commentary from various sources, the use of which may not be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is posted here in the cause of understanding and discussion of environmental, political, religious, economic, Constitutional, democratic, scientific, and societal issues affecting our lives and the world. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is available and distributed without profit for informational, research and educational purposes. For more information go to:

The publisher of this site DOES NOT own the copyrights to some of the images on the site. The copyrights lie with the respective owners. If any copyrighted material has been published, genuine rights owners may kindly email me at 19johngalt54-at-gmail-dot-com. I will be happy to discuss it's removal per 18 USC 107.

“The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive.”

~~Thomas Jefferson

"The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased." ~~ Alexander Hamilton, American founding father.

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." ~~Thomas Jefferson

"We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality" ~~Ayn Rand

"How wonderful for governments that the people they administer do not think" ~~Adolph Hitler

"We should not forget that the spark which ignited the American Revolution was caused by the British attempt to confiscate the firearms of the colonists." ~~Patrick Henry

"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall not be infringed."
~~2nd Amendment to U.S. Constitution

"A government is the most dangerous threat to man's rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims." ~~Ayn Rand