The background for this paper was the experienced discrepancy between the increasingly serious global ecological crisis and an apparent absence of this crisis in psychology. Ecopsychology is an approach that seeks to bridge the gap between psychology and ecology, man and nature, and as such may have the potential to reduce this discrepancy. The ecopsychological perspective seems to have a weak voice in the contemporary clinical discourse. In this paper I seek to answer whether ecopsychology still may be relevant to clinical psychology. To answer this, I explore the humanistic-existential psychology as represented by Irvin D. Yalom s existential psychotherapy, in the light of ecopsychology. The humanistic-existential approach emphasizes the individual´s freedom, choice and self-realization, and is today an important approach in Norwegian clinical psychology. On the other hand, ecopsychology highlights the fundamental human relationship to and dependence on the surrounding nature. Through the exploration I find that ecopsychology contribute to new and diversified understandings in the humanistic-existential perspective. As a perspective that may contribute to and diversify a significant perspective for many Norwegian psychologists, ecopsychology s relevance in clinical psychology is argued. The exploration further finds that a psychology, which takes into consideration the ecological crisis to a greater extent than the humanistic-existential approach does today, may foster and encourage the individual s potential for caring and engaging with the world as healing pathways to psychological health and meaning. Hence, the exploration argues for the relevance of ecopsychology in contemporary clinical psychology.