I find the subject of interest since certain details of the Temple Mount in Josephus (that anyone alive at the time could have seen with their own eyes) do not fit with the current consensus location. If Josephus was correct, the location of the Temple in Jerusalem as currently identified can’t be correct. That would have dramatic implications. Naturally, an alternative location is hotly contested.

With respect to Buchanan’s works, here is what is included on the new Logos set.

Biblical and Theological Insights from Ancient and Modern Civil Law

The Book of Daniel

The Book of Hebrews: Its Challenge from Zion

The Book of Revelation: Its Introduction and Prophecy

The Gospel According to Matthew (Vol. 1)

The Gospel According to Matthew (Vol. 2)

Introduction to Intertextuality

Jewish Messianic Movements

New Testament Eschatology: Historical and Cultural Background

I am told by David Sielaff of MartinThe last book translates to English from (for the first time) many Jewish writings that comment on various Old Testament prophecies. It is analytical, not agreeing or criticizing the prophetic findings.

I had seen a headline about this on Martin’s site but otherwise had never heard of this before. Very compelling article! I’ll add Buchanan to my Logos wishlist.

You mention on moreUR.com that you don’t agree with a lot Martin’s work as he’s not a theologian but he nailed the Star, and it appears by this post, Temple location. Are there any other works of Martin do you give a green light on?