Minnesota Business TRO

A TRO is often used in the business context when someone is violating a non-compete agreement, non-solicitation agreement, or has wrongfully taken something from your business (confidential company information, trade secrets, customer lists, etc.) and is using it to compete with you or hurt your business.

In the family context, a TRO can be obtained without a lawsuit. However, in general, which includes businesses, a lawsuit generally must be initiated to seek a TRO. To obtain a TRO, your attorney would generally need to attend two hearings before a judge and file and/or serve a number of documents.

A TRO typically lasts for a few days until the Temporary Injunction Hearing, which essentially is a hearing to consider extending the terms of the TRO until the end of trial or another date set by the court.

Court Hearings Required for a Minnesota TRO

Hearing 1: Temporary Restraining Order Hearing. The first step to obtaining a TRO is filing the appropriate papers with the Court and going before a judge. This is the first hearing, called the TRO Hearing. Often, your opponent is not at the first hearing. The judge may grant the TRO, but the TRO is only good until the second court hearing, which is generally scheduled to occur within 10 days.

Hearing 2: Temporary Injunction Order Hearing. The second court hearing is the Temporary Injunction Hearing. At the Temporary Injunction Hearing, the judge will hear arguments and examine evidence from both sides, and the judge will decide whether the TRO should be extended.

Documents Required for a Minnesota TRO

A TRO is part of a larger lawsuit. Thus, a TRO normally cannot be filed alone (except in domestic violence cases). Thus, the following documents are involved.

To start a lawsuit, these documents are normally prepared:

Summons

Complaint

Reply (only required when the other side counterclaims)

Informational Statement

Preservation Notice

To request that the court give you a TRO, these documents are normally prepared:

Notice of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

Affidavit for Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

Proposed Order for Temporary Restraining Order

To extend the terms of your TRO for more than a few days, a Temporary Injunction is needed, which normally involves preparing these documents:

Notice of Motion for Temporary Injunction

Motion for Temporary Injunction

Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Injunction

Affidavit for Motion for Temporary Injunction

Proposed Order for Temporary Injunction

Responsive Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Injunction

This work usually takes a week to prepare and get before a judge.

Minnesota TRO and Temporary Injunction Legal Standards

The Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure provide the legal standards for a Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Injunction.

Minnesota Temporary Injunction Legal Standard

Rule 65.01 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure provides the legal standards for a Temporary Restraining Order:

A temporary restraining order may be granted without written or oral notice to the adverse party or that party’s attorney only if (1) it clearly appears from specific facts shown by affidavit or by the verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the applicant before the adverse party or that party’s attorney can be heard in opposition, and (2) the applicant’s attorney states to the court in writing the efforts, if any, which have been made to give notice or the reasons supporting the claim that notice should not be required. In the event that a temporary restraining order is based upon any affidavit, a copy of such affidavit must be served with the temporary restraining order. In case a temporary restraining order is granted without notice, the motion for a temporary injunction shall be set down for hearing at the earliest practicable time and shall take precedence over all matters except older matters of the same character; and when the motion comes on for hearing, the party who obtained the temporary restraining order shall proceed with the application for a temporary injunction, and, if the party does not do so, the court shall dissolve the temporary restraining order. On written or oral notice to the party who obtained the ex parte temporary restraining order, the adverse party may appear and move its dissolution or modification, and in that event the court shall proceed to hear and determine such motion as expeditiously as the ends of justice require.

Minnesota Temporary Injunction Legal Standard

Rule 65.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure provides the legal standards for a Temporary Injunction:

(a) No temporary injunction shall be granted without notice of motion or an order to show cause to the adverse party.

(b) A temporary injunction may be granted if by affidavit, deposition testimony, or oral testimony in court, it appears that sufficient grounds exist therefor.

(c) Before or after the commencement of the hearing on a motion for a temporary injunction, the court may order the trial of the action on the merits to be advanced and consolidated with the hearing on the motion. Even when this consolidation is not ordered, any evidence received upon a motion for a temporary injunction which would be admissible at the trial on the merits becomes part of the trial record and need not be repeated at trial. This provision shall be so construed and applied as to preserve any rights the parties may have to trial by jury.

These rules from the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure also apply to Temporary Restraining Orders and Temporary Injunctions:

Rule 65.03: Security

(a) No temporary restraining order or temporary injunction shall be granted except upon the giving of security by the applicant, in such sum as the court deems proper, for the payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred or suffered by any party who is found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained.

(b) Whenever security is given in the form of a bond or other undertaking with one or more sureties, each surety submits to the jurisdiction of the court and irrevocably appoints the court administrator as the surety’s agent upon whom any papers affecting liability on the bond or undertaking may be served. The surety’s liability may be enforced on motion without the necessity of an independent action. The motion and such notice of the motion as the court prescribes may be served on the court administrator, who shall forthwith mail copies to the sureties if their addresses are known.

Rule 65.04: Form and Scope of Injunction or Restraining Order

Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order shall set forth the reasons for its issuance; shall be specific in terms; shall describe in reasonable detail, and not by reference to the complaint or other document, the act or acts sought to be restrained; and is binding only upon the parties to the action, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise.

How to Get a Business Temporary Restraining Order

As you can see, there is a lot involved in seeking a TRO and Temporary Injunction in the business context. The legal standards are complex, and if you fail to fulfill the legal requirements, your motion will be dismissed. For this reason, an experienced Minnesota business litigation attorney should be hired if your business needs a TRO and/or Temporary Injunction.

attorney Practicing In This Area

Posts related to Business

MNvest is the name of a new law allowing crowdfunding for small companies in Minnesota. MNvest allows companies to raise capital online from unaccredited investors. MNvest is overseen by the Minnesota Department of Commerce. Unlike other crowdfunding websites—like Kickstarter, GoFundMe, and Indiegogo—MNvest allows companies to raise capital in exchange for offering equity ownership of the... Read More →

An Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) allows a company’s employees to own some or all of the company. And ESOP is used to buy out equity from a current owner, create benefits for employees, and give employees a stake in the company, which may impact morale as well as public relations. ESOP Tax Benefits And... Read More →

In Minnesota, a telecommunications carrier is “a person, firm, association, or corporation authorized to furnish” an interchange telephone service and/or a local telephone service. Minn. Stat. § 327.01 subd. 6. Such carrier “does not include entities that derive more than 50 percent of their revenues from operator services provided to transient locations such as hotels,... Read More →

Company Legal Compliance Checklist Compliance with Employment Laws Abide by fair employment practices; no discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, or national origin. Maintain an employee handbook with protective policies against discrimination and sexual harassment. Obtain appropriate documentation of all employees’ citizenship. Appropriately classify each employee as either an employee or an independent... Read More →

This is a guest article from Professor Daniel Kleinberger. Prof. Kleinberger is the director of the Mitchell Fellows Program at the William Mitchell College of Law. He was the reporter for the MSBA Business Law Section Task Force that developed the Professional Firms Act and the principal drafter of the act. Introduction Judging from frequency of citations,... Read More →

This is a guest article from Professor Daniel Kleinberger. Prof. Kleinberger is the director of the Mitchell Fellows Program at the William Mitchell College of Law. He was the reporter for the MSBA Business Law Section Task Force that developed the Professional Firms Act and the principal drafter of the act. It has been said that Hegel... Read More →

This is a guest article from Professor Daniel Kleinberger. Prof. Kleinberger is the director of the Mitchell Fellows Program at the William Mitchell College of Law. He was the reporter for the MSBA Business Law Section Task Force that developed the Professional Firms Act and the principal drafter of the act. I. Introduction and Irony2 In 1975,... Read More →

This is a guest article from Professor Daniel Kleinberger. Prof. Kleinberger is the director of the Mitchell Fellows Program at the William Mitchell College of Law. He was the reporter for the MSBA Business Law Section Task Force that developed the Professional Firms Act and the principal drafter of the act. I. Introduction In any context the... Read More →

This is a guest article from Professor Daniel Kleinberger. Prof. Kleinberger is the director of the Mitchell Fellows Program at the William Mitchell College of Law. He was the reporter for the MSBA Business Law Section Task Force that developed the Professional Firms Act and the principal drafter of the act. On January 1, 2002, the Revised... Read More →

Introduction In a dynamic economy with rapidly developing technological advancements, companies often struggle to keep their key employees from moving to new opportunities. Retention of these employees must involve some type of equity participation. Base salary, and even a salary with bonus opportunities, just doesn’t cut it in hyper-competitive business sectors. Companies must be willing... Read More →

Leave a Public Comment

.

This site is educational information based on general legal principles. Specific facts can and often do drastically change legal results. You should not rely on this information except as a trigger to contact your attorney and obtain advice specific to your circumstances. By using this site, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

* Patent disclaimer: Attorneys in our firm are licensed to handle patent transactions and litigation. Our firm is affiliated with a top rated intellectual property firm for patent preparation, filing, opposition, and prosecution.