Looks like some Hillery@emails have uncovered she may in fact have used her *own* servers to communicate sensitive and possibly secret information.

Somebody is exposing the corruption and arrogance.

Judge Andrew Napolitano is revealing more from the FOIA documents containing Hillary Clinton’s email. Using her unsecured server, and not an
approved State Department server, Napolitano said, through her email, she revealed the location of French fighter jets, the size and location of
no-fly zones in Libya, and the location of Ambassador Chris Stevens. Do you remember Hillary calling Chris Stevens a “friend,” as she stood by his
coffin? Take a look at this email at Gateway Pundit, sent by Hillary (known as hrod – cute, huh?) the night of the Benghazi attack –– and
friends, hrod reported Chris Smith to be dead. Not Chris Stevens, and not Sean Smith (who worked with the Ambassador, and was also murdered).

In a letter sent to the U.S. State Department and just filed today with U.S. federal Judge Emmet G Sullivan, the counsel for Cheryl Mills wrote:
“Ms. Mills does not believe that she has paper copies of potential records in her possession. Following our production on August 10, 2015 [of the
defense counsel’s version of the electronic records], we have instructed her to delete any and all electronic records in her possession.”
That is a far stretch from a statement by Ms. Mills under penalty of perjury, and she and her lawyers are planning to delete the emails Judge Sullivan
wants produced? Needless to say, Judicial Watch has made an emergency filing in Judge Sullivan’s court to stop the further destruction of evidence
of what may very well be assorted criminal conduct and violations of numerous federal laws.

Of course, Hillary and Co waited until Friday to state openly they were deleting emails....

"“Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills are showing contempt for a federal court order. And now we know that Cheryl Mills may very
well destroy federal records as soon as Monday, August 10.

Government watchdog group Judicial Watch reported startling new developments in the Clinton email saga, Friday evening. It appears that Hillary
Clinton, Human Abedin, and Cheryl Mills are openly defying a federal judge’s order, and one of the three, according to her attorney, may be
preparing to destroy government records.

Judicial Watch reports that the State Department on Friday provided a status report as required by a July 31 federal court order. The order required
the State Department to “request that Hillary Clinton and her top State Department aides Human Abedin and Cheryl Mills confirm, under penalty of
perjury, that they have produced all government records in their possession, return any other government records immediately, and describe their use
of Hillary Clinton’s email server to conduct government business.” pjmedia.com...

Mrs. Clinton's declaration fails to comply with both Judge Sullivan's court order and the State Department's request. Clinton does not certify she
turned over all federal records and provides no information on the extent that Abedin and Mills used her server.

Meanwhile, the same judge issued an emergency order to stop the further deletion of
emails, documents.

In view of [20] the Government's status report, the Court hereby directs the Government to request that Mrs. Hillary Clinton, Ms. Huma Abedin, and
Ms. Cheryl Mills i) not delete any federal documents, electronic or otherwise, in their possession or control, and ii) provide appropriate assurances
to the Government that the above-named individuals will not delete any such documents. The Government shall inform the Court of the status of its
compliance with this Order no later than August 12, 2015, including a copy of any assurances provided by Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills that
they will not delete any federal documents in their possession or control. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on August 7, 2015

So...she is still dodging the court order...question is what will The Court do?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.