There were some reports a couple of weeks back indicating that Sony would be releasing an update of some form that would make all PlayStation 3 games playable on PlayStation Vita via Remote Play. Sony officials have denied those reports.

Freelance journalist Munechika Nishida conducted an interview with Sony's PlayStation Vita development staff for the latest installment of his "Random Tracking" series at Impress Watch. He asked Sony Computer Entertainment Senior VP Yoshio Matsumoto and Division 2 Software Development Head Muneki Shimada about the reports.

"That information is mistaken," said Matsumoto. "The compatibility is achieved on the side of the PS3 game, just like normal." Shimada agreed, saying that as with previous implementations of Remote Play, games will need API support.

This appears to mean no catch-me-all solution for making all PS3 games playable remotely on Vita.

While Sony demonstrated Killzone 3's Remote Play support at the Tokyo Game Show in September, it has not said when Vita owners will get to try out Remote Play for themselves in games.

While not game related, Remote Play will be available from day one for PS3's "Torne" DVR device. This will be achieved via a free update to Torne's firmware, which is due for release shortly.

This last part has no sort of information value and the point of is to laugh at Guild for using the available info so far to determine something? Oh please I hope you're really not that low.. There are tons of threads were people have made assumptions with what info we have, the info turned out to be untrue/mislead and people still don't laugh. Get a grip man..

On the actual topic: Denies remote play for all titles =/= remote play for only simple games. Actually Denies remote play for all titles =/= no remote play. As far as the game list goes (oh yeah we don't even have that), not much is learnt from this aside from the fact that not every game supports it. If Killzone 3 works on it, I can see quite a few other good games working on it if the games are in any way comparable.. I'm interested in the feature, but not sure what I'll do with it (though this can be said for quite a few of the latest innovations in gaming).

This last part has no sort of information value and the point of is to laugh at Guild for using the available info so far to determine something?

Click to expand...

Yes?? It is always topical to make fun of bad topical posting. Also you don't need to sign your posts with your username. Looking to the left of your post I can see "Qtis" just above your avatar, making appending your username to your post a bit redundant.

I have been watching VITA videos on youtube and sony comments about VITA and they can't make up their minds.
One day they say its remote play for all PS3 games (which made me think, I should buy a VITA because this is pretty cool) and the next I find out it's basically not possible (so now I give up).
I thought sony said the VITA will beat the WiiU with its PS3 connectivity, this I now believe to be complete bullshit.

I am starting to see that VITA is just what the PSP was. Unsupported in the long term, and financially bankrupt from day one.
A top bit of tech, but it wont do even half of what is was advertised to do.
Sony you never learn.

I have been watching VITA videos on youtube and sony comments about VITA and they can't make up their minds.
One day they say its remote play for all PS3 games (which made me think, I should buy a VITA because this is pretty cool) and the next I find out it's basically not possible (so now I give up).
I thought sony said the VITA will beat the WiiU with its PS3 connectivity, this I now believe to be complete bullshit.

I am starting to see that VITA is just what the PSP was. Unsupported in the long term, and financially bankrupt from day one.
A top bit of tech, but it wont do even half of what is was advertised to do.
Sony you never learn.

Click to expand...

Psp didn't do half of what is was advertised to do?
They didn't even officially advertise that the psv was going to able to do that.
The comments probably came from different people in Sony.

They could always update it later, but then that be a sign it was rush to launch.

Well at least the wii u connection with the umote is definitely for all games.

No I just ignored it because it's annoying seeing it in every post you make when you're 'joking'.
Edit: I also love how you try to make an on-topic comment with an off-topic post everytime and how you're going to edit and quote this post into the above.

Probably "Can" in regards to it being in the SDK was taken to mean "the functionality will be available to all games" (which is technically true if it's in the SDK, right?), and that was taken to mean all games will do it (since from our understanding it's something sort of passive).

This last part has no sort of information value and the point of is to laugh at Guild for using the available info so far to determine something? Oh please I hope you're really not that low.. There are tons of threads were people have made assumptions with what info we have, the info turned out to be untrue/mislead and people still don't laugh. Get a grip man..

On the actual topic: Denies remote play for all titles =/= remote play for only simple games. Actually Denies remote play for all titles =/= no remote play. As far as the game list goes (oh yeah we don't even have that), not much is learnt from this aside from the fact that not every game supports it. If Killzone 3 works on it, I can see quite a few other good games working on it if the games are in any way comparable.. I'm interested in the feature, but not sure what I'll do with it (though this can be said for quite a few of the latest innovations in gaming).

-Qtis

Click to expand...

I provided all the info in the beggining of my post. And I can post my opinion since my post.
One thing is to make an assusmption, Guild was pratically saying "Read the title, idiot.". (I love you guild, so please don't get mad at me for this post .)

So what if Guild was wrong when the first announcement said remote play was for all. He didn't know, and quite frankly, no one else here knew either. You take any other kind of similar news, even for a different platform, and someone will say it's true until proven wrong, either by another source, or an edit from the original.

So folks, we know the truth now. No need to go up in people's face saying "you're wrong" like an idiot who could have easily been wrong instead.