You are here

Contents

1. NEWS

It is unusual for policies that are still under discussion by committees and the Board to be discussed in public at the instigation of one or more Board delegations. In a blog posted on 28 March, Meg Davis, a consultant to the Developing Country NGO Delegation, the Developed Country NGO Delegation and the Communities Delegation, discusses proposed changes to the Eligibility Policy. Aidspan labeled these discussions “appropriate and useful.” In this article, we provide a summary of the contents of the blog.

2. NEWS

For weeks, the Global Fund has been criticized for entering into a partnership with Heineken because of concerns about the effects of alcohol on health. Now, the Global Fund has suspended the partnership – but, it says, for reasons that are unrelated to the criticism: The Fund said it was concerned about Heineken’s use of female beer promoters in ways that expose them to sexual exploitation and health risks. Executive Director Peter Sands announced the decision in a message to the Board and in a statement on the Fund’s website.

3. NEWS

Chief of Staff Marijke Wijnroks is leading a review of internal Global Fund policies on sexual harassment in light of recent developments in other global health organizations (and beyond). The Global Fund has an Employee Handbook and a Code of Conduct for Employees that are designed to prevent and address instances of bullying and harassment, including sexual harassment. Since 2011, the Global Fund has investigated three cases of alleged sexual harassment.

4. NEWS

Only a select group of the world’s top global health organizations have placed gender equality at the center of their operations, both programmatically and institutionally, according to a study carried out by Global Health 50/50. The Global Fund ranked among the top nine of the 140 organizations studied.

5. BACKGROUND

Many of our readers tell us that they find the Global Fund’s Co-Financing Policy confusing. So, in this article we provide a detailed explanation. The Co-Financing Policy is contained in the Sustainability, Transition and Co-Financing Policy, adopted in April 2016. It replaced the Global Fund’s policies on willingness to pay and counterpart financing.

6. NEWS

Iraq’s TB component was in the process of transitioning away from Global Fund support when the ISIS emergency hit. Now the plan is to have Iraq join the Global Fund’s Middle East Response initiative when it enters its second phase in 2019. In December 2017, the Global Fund Board approved an extension for Iraq’s existing TB grant through the end of 2018.

7. NEWS

President Donald Trump had sought a $224 million cut to the U.S. contribution to the Global Fund, but the FY 2018 budget adopted by Congress left the contribution intact at $1.35 billion. This is the first contribution by the U.S. towards its pledge of $4.3 billion for the replenishment period 2017–2019. The budgets for other global health programs generally remained unchanged from FY 2017, despite the president’s proposed cuts.

8. NEWS

The Global Fund Board has approved another $102.9 million in funding for six grants emanating from four funding requests submitted by four countries. Interventions worth $40.3 million were added to the Unfunded Quality Demand Register. Nepal led the way with three grants approved worth $43.6 million. The cumulative amount awarded to date from the 2017–2019 allocations is just under $9 billion.

9. OVERVIEW

Eastern Europe and Central Asia is one of two regions where planning for the transition away from Global Fund support is most advanced. (The other region is Latin America and the Caribbean.) This article provides an overview of the transition status of HIV, TB and malaria components in EECA countries.

11. NEWS

When it reviewed Pakistan’s recent TB funding request, the Technical Review Panel requested more information on how the needs of key populations such as refugees and people in congregate settings would be addressed. This issue was cleared during grant-making. This article provides a summary of the comments of the TRP and the Grant Approvals Committee on the funding request.

Among the grants approved recently by the Board were three TB grants to Pakistan. This article reports on the comments from the Technical Review Panel (TRP) and the Grants Approvals Committee (GAC) on the funding request from which these grants emanated.

Pakistan has a high burden of TB with an estimated incidence of 270 per 100,000 and a prevalence of 342 per 100,000. In of 270 per 100,000 and a prevalence of 342 per 100,000. In 2016, Pakistan reported 356,390 TB cases (70% of its estimated 510,000 new cases). Multi-drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) is estimated at 4.2% among new cases and 16% among re-treatment cases. The identification of MDR-TB is sub-optimal at 22% of estimated MDR-TB cases diagnosed.

The objectives of the program supported by the Global Fund are to:

expand accurate and rapid diagnosis and up-to-date treatment from 20% to 40% of estimated MDR-TB cases by 2020; and

reach 1.24 million DS-TB patients by increasing treatment coverage from 70% to 85% and finding an additional 174,000 TB cases.

The TB grants will be managed by the same three principal recipients (PRs) as the existing grants. See the table for more information.

Table: TB grants to Pakistan ($ million)

Grant name

Principal recipient

Value

Core focus

PAK-T-NTP

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination *

89.1 m

To support activities in the public sector through provincial TB programs and to procure TB drugs and diagnostics for all PRs.

To implement TB case finding through enhanced engagement of the private sector in 65 districts.

Total

144.1 m

* The grant is managed by the Ministry’s National TB Control Program.

The country coordinating mechanism (CCM) submitted a within-allocation request of $130.1 million, and a matching funds request of $14.0 million. The CCM also submitted a prioritized above allocation request (PAAR) of $150.5 million, of which $48.4 million was deemed by the TRP to be quality demand and was added to the Unfunded Quality Demand (UQD) Register. During grant making, $4.5 million in efficiencies was identified, all of which was reinvested into the grant to cover costs for diagnosis and treatment of an additional 26,000 DS-TB cases and to procure essential commodities.

Strengths of the funding request

In its review of the funding request, the TRP highlighted a number of strengths. Most notably, the TRP said that the modules and interventions in the funding request complement Pakistan’s National End TB Strategic Plan 2017–2020. The TRP also said that the CCM made good use of this funding opportunity to cover some key program gaps, such as insufficient MDR-TB diagnostics and treatment coverage and a 30% case detection gap.

The TRP said that the funding request recognizes gender differences in TB and includes some specific activities to address gender imbalances in TB case notification.

Issues and concerns

The TRP raised several concerns when it reviewed Pakistan’s TB funding request. Some issues were resolved during grant-making, while others will be addressed during grant implementation. Some of these issues are described below.

ISSUE: Implementation plans for key populations were not provided. The funding request did not provide any specific details on the inclusion of key populations such as refugees, internally mobile persons (internally displaced or migrants from neighboring countries) and populations in congregate settings (prisons and detention centers). The TRP requested that the CCM develop an implementation plan on how populations in congregate settings, as well as mobile and refugee populations, will access TB prevention and care services.

OUTCOME: This issue was cleared during grant making. The CCM said that a legal environment assessment and a gender assessment is planned for 2018–2019, with support from USAID and the Stop TB Partnership. The goal of these assessments is to understand the legal-, policy- and gender-related barriers that vulnerable and TB-affected populations face in accessing TB services. In addition, the CCM developed an implementation plan for key populations in congregate settings. Targets were added to the performance framework of the Indus Hospital (one of the three PRs) covering the implementation of TB screening and the treatment of prisoners.

ISSUE: TB screening approaches for presumptive TB patients are unclear. Although the PR is intending to undertake systematic TB screening targeting presumptive TB patients in high-risk populations to increase TB case finding, the funding request did not adequately describe which high-risk population groups will be targeted. In addition, the request revealed different approaches to screening presumptive TB patients among implementing partners. The TRP requested that the CCM develop an outline of the process for prioritizing active case finding efforts among presumptive TB patients; approaches for targeting vulnerable groups; and screening algorithms to target symptomatic cases in various high-risk groups.

OUTCOME: The issue was apparently cleared at the time of grant making; however, the grant documents did not say exactly how.

ISSUE: Insufficient details on private practitioner engagement and oversight. While Pakistan is expanding plans to work more closely with the private sector on the TB response, the funding request did not clearly describe the public-private-mix (PPM) model. The TRP recommended that a formal situational assessment of the PPM activities for TB care in Pakistan be conducted to assess the contributions of the private sector. Following this assessment, the TRP said, an action-plan for 2018–2022 should be developed that integrates PPM partners and their models of care.

OUTCOME: This issue was not completely resolved during grant making and will be fully addressed during the first nine months of grant implementation.

Matching funds

The $14.0 million in matching funds covered two strategic priority areas: (a) finding missing TB cases; and (b) resilient and sustainable systems for health (RSSH). The TRP said the matching funds request prioritized identification and treatment for drug-susceptible and MDR-TB patients and expanded collaboration with the private sector.

Co-financing

The co-financing commitments from government for the 2018–2020 implementation period of its TB grants was deemed sufficient to meet the co-financing requirements set out by the Global Fund.

Sustainability

Global Fund support has allowed for the scale-up of case finding, strengthening of private sector involvement in the TB response, implementation of large-scale MDR-TB programs and the introduction of innovative and strengthened systems. To improve sustainability of Global Fund investments, the government has absorbed the costs of scaling up the services provided through the public health system. In addition, the government has committed to increasingly absorb the costs of first-line TB drugs from the current 50% in 2018 to 80% by 2020.

However, some key constraints pose major risks for sustainability of TB programs in Pakistan. These include historically low spending by government on TB programs, and significant dependence on donor aid. Various initiatives to mobilize additional domestic resources for the TB program and to improve its sustainability are underway, including the following:

Pakistan adopted a National Health Vision 2016–2025, which aims to increase public spending on health from just below 1% of GDP to 3% by 2025;

to boost private sector engagement, provincial governments are working on making TB a notifiable disease through the development of Mandatory TB Case Notification Acts and by-laws; and

provincial TB programs will be advocating for more funding and for measures to ensure that existing and future commitments are realized.