Trouble logging in?We were forced to invalidate all account passwords. You will have to reset your password to login. If you have trouble resetting your password, please send us a message with as much helpful information as possible, such as your username and any email addresses you may have used to register. Whatever you do, please do not create a new account. That is not the right solution, and it is against our forum rules to own multiple accounts.

Hmm, no, because I have yet to see any pink articles for guys. I've seen people wearing pink shirts once or twice, but it turned out they weren't theirs (lol). I also admit it would be weird as hell to walk around in pink cargo pants or pink jeans (not even sure if they exist).

Speaking outside of dressing issues, colors are mostly affiliated with emotions rather than individuals, like greedy green, scary yellow, sad blue, happy white, etc., so unless pink is somehow GAR, I don't really know if the question still stands.

Its a gender thing really.. Its what society sees it as. I once herd that Pink used to be a boy color, and blue for girls. Red was associated as male, and pink being seen as a lighter shade of red was used for boys. You can see Kings wearing the color red, so it might have relation with associating pink with male royalty. A change in Social Norm

I vaguely remembered that too, and found this interesting tidbit from wiki:

An article in the trade publication Earnshaw's Infants' Department in June 1918 said: "The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl."[18] From then until the 1940s, pink was considered appropriate for boys because being related to red it was the more masculine and decided color, while blue was considered appropriate for girls because it was the more delicate and dainty color, or related to the Virgin Mary.[19][20][21]