Behavior has consequences! This applies both to individuals and to societies. Learn how most of the crises presented by politicians and the media can be traced to the cumulative effects of our own behavior in 5 key areas: Economic Understanding, Discipline, Responsibility, Critical Thinking, and Perspective. Ignoring behavior leads to failure; using this new model leads to real answers.
New examples every MONDAY and FRIDAY!

Popular Posts

Friday, June 2, 2017

Pink Slime, Take 2

It started more than five years ago.The term “pink slime” was apparently coined
by “a federal microbiologist” (whatever that means) but brought
to light by the ranting of a celebrity chef (whatever that means).They were concerned – or just trying to make
headlines by getting a bunch of others concerned – about the food companies
adding it to ground beef without a specific label. It made more headlines when McDonald's
and other major chains, in reaction to this manufactured concern, discontinued
their use of “ammonia-treated beef,” which doesn’t sound any more appetizing.

The actual description is "lean,
finely textured beef."It is made
from left-over meat trimmings from other cuts of beef.After being heated and spun to remove most of
the fat, it is exposed to "a puff of ammonium hydroxide gas" to kill
bacteria, such as E. coli and salmonella.Blocks were shipped from a company in South Dakota to be added to ground
beef to reduce the overall fat content.

According to CBS News at the time (2012):“Though the term ‘pink slime’ has been used
pejoratively for at least several years, it wasn't until last week that social
media suddenly exploded with worry and an online petition seeking its ouster
from school lunches that quickly garnered hundreds of thousands of supporters.”Soon grocery stores were pledging to stop
using it in their ground beef.

As I wrote in April 2012 when this news
first broke, why must people resort to such name-calling? Either they
have a valid argument or they don’t.Instead they try to catch everyone up in an emotional reaction to
promote their particular cause or “purity
crusade.” No one thinks about the real
danger or about the jobs lost when this type of misinformation goes viral
through social media or on-line petitions. Why do people speak out
against waste in other areas and remain silent on this issue of basically
recycling usable meat scraps instead of throwing them in the garbage? How
can Kroger and the others ban this product outright, totally depriving
customers of a choice, when they offer twenty different kinds of dishwashing
soap? (The educated customers would
likely not be swayed by these scare tactics and choose to buy the same kind of
ground beef, less expensive and less fatty, that they have been buying for the
last 20 years.)

This is just another version of the
Alar scare back in the 1980s.Here is a summary from the Chicago Tribune from shortly afterward.“60 Minutes aired a
segment publicizing claims that 6,000 preschoolers may eventually get cancer
from residues of the pesticide in apples and apple juice.”Meryl Streep, whose food-safety expertise was apparently unquestioned, testified before Congress and spread the news on TV talk shows.“The stampede was on. Schools yanked apples
off their menus; parents threw out their apple juice. The EPA began the process
of banning alar.”Apple farmers lost
millions and the maker stopped selling it.“Will Americans be safer? Probably not.”

This is another aspect of the danger I warned about last time,
that technology is out-pacing our ability to cope.We are so much more interconnected than in
the 1980s that these have become regular occurrences.Someone comes out with a food safety scare – often
from foodie blogs and websites – and the kneejerk reactions begin, first by a
few on the Internet, then by a host of followers who gasp and sign petitions,
then by the manufacturers and retailers who fear losing sales based on
the hysteria. People lose jobs, and our
options become more and more limited. We are slowly squeezed into a box defined
by the publicity hounds, fanatics and frightened mothers.We end up no safer and the economy suffers
when resources are dedicated to non-value-added activities.

Fortunately, there may be hope. “Dakota Dunes-based
Beef Products Inc. sued the television network in 2012, saying ABC's coverage
misled consumers into believing the product is unsafe and led to the closures
of three plants and layoffs of roughly 700 workers. The reports emphasized that
the product at the time was present in 70 percent of the ground beef sold in
supermarkets, but wasn't labeled.”The
trial begins in July.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me

is highly qualified to comment on the connection between our behavioral choices and the results we get. His formal education and training in observing and classifying behavior is supported by more than 40 years of practical business experience and 10 years of personal research. He is a West Point graduate with two Master’s degrees in business.
He is also a published author, Master Gardener and RYT200 yoga teacher.