Today’s Controversy: Mitt Romney responded to the Supreme Court’s ruling on Obamacare—which, as a Republican running for president, he is contractually obligate to despise—by drawing out tiny linguistic distinctions between the healthcare program he backed in Massachusetts and the nearly indistinguishable one that is a major piece of Obama’s reelection campaign. Romney and his campaign are apparently under the impression that voters respond positively when you defend your platform with a petty, borderline ridiculous semantic argument. This is not true. It is also memorable. Which means, in November, people will remember how not-true it is.

Since 1957, GQ has inspired men to look sharper and live smarter with its unparalleled coverage of style, culture, and beyond. From award-winning writing and photography to binge-ready videos to electric live events, GQ meets millions of modern men where they live, creating the moments that create conversations.