Nuclear Waste by Richard A. MullerNuclear waste is a radioactive waste that is dangerous, and a fair percentage of people would agree on this topic. However, is it really dangerous or is it just harmful to an extent? In society, many debates are held over trying to prove to the world that this substance is harmful. In the essay, “Nuclear Waste,” Muller states clearly that he sides with the anti-nuke of the debate and how he pinpoints the facts of nuclear waste with great persuasion. Yet, it is uncertain whether Muller clearly has a good argument and/or answers the questions that many people linger to know. In Richard A. Muller’s article “Nuclear Waste,” the author states clearly about how he is against the issues on nuclear waste and how it could pose a risk in society. Muller starts his essay by critiquing his opinion in a very persuasive introduction. He was very persuasive about his opinion when he states his questions about the issue like “How can we possibly make sure that this material is safe and that we can certify this material and it can be kept safe for 100,000 years?” (Muller 207) I think that these questions were purposely stated to enable the reader to answer questions that reinforce his case, and allow them to work towards taking action in some way. I also think it influences the readers and people in general to try and understand the risks of nuclear waste. We as humans need to keep in mind of the risks of nuclear waste, and how radiation could affect one’s health. As Muller have stated, “Children should be concerned about their health because the exposure of radiation can allow them to suffer quicker than adults would.” (Muller 206) Therefore, Muller presents his case with facts and his opinion on how nuclear waste can affect adults and the young as well. While Richard A. Muller implies his opinion in being against nuclear waste, Muller seems to be convinced that he made a strong position on nuclear waste since the start. Although, I notice...

YOU MAY ALSO FIND THESE DOCUMENTS HELPFUL

...System (TPS) and is one of the three types of waste (Muda, Mura, Muri) that it identifies. Mura signifies wastes due to unevenness and muri signifies wastes due to overburden.
Waste as defined by Toyota’s president, Fujio Cho, is “anything other than the minimum amount of equipment, materials, parts and workers which are absolutely essential to production”. The seven types of wastes identified are
1. Overproduction –Waste due to producing before customer requires or more than needed which often hides production problems.
2. Waiting time – Idle time in manufacturing because materials, information, people or equipment are not ready
3. Transportation – Moving the product adds no value but increases the risk of damage and delays.
4. Inventory – Raw materials, WIP and finished goods block up capital and also run the risk of damage, obsolescence.
5. Overprocessing – Complex processing, using of expensive resources which can be reduced, processing beyond user requirements
6. Motion – Unnecessary movement in workers and equipments adds no value but wastes time
7. Product defects – Defective products are rejected by customers and have no more than scrap value.
Elimination of these wastes are important since they add no value but impose time and cost penalties. These wastes also show inefficient production. Further excess inventory can block up...

...
Analysis of “NuclearWaste”
Richard A. Muller, an awardee of the MacArthur Fellowship and physics professor at UC Berkley, states in his 2008 essay “NuclearWaste”, that Americans and the rest of the world are overly concerned with radioactive debris and the possibility of nuclear contamination. Muller first brings to light the most common fears of storing nuclearwaste; volcanic activity in the Yucca Mountains, the area where the waste is stored, and the possibility of radioactive particles contaminating the water supply. Muller then goes on to entertain opposing viewpoints on how the waste should be disposed of. Muller then goes on to support his own claim by providing statistical data and explanations of radioactive decay throughout the essay. Muller uses a professional and informative tone throughout the essay while at the same time using langue and examples that are easy to understand and follow. Muller uses logos and ethos to persuade his audience to a common consensus that radioactive waste can be contained safely and effectively while posing no threat to the population or environment. This essay is meant to analyze Muller’s arguments provided throughout his article in order to examine his rhetorical strategies.
First Muller evokes fear in his audience by reminding them of a few of the worst case scenarios that could...

...Nuclearwaste is dangerous just about anyone knows that. But is it really that dangerous or is it simply overstated? The answer to this question is a heated debate that involves everybody from politicians pushing for policy they don’t really understand to scientists who are trying to understand it to the public who take everything they hear as the truth. Honestly, I don’t even know if I can iron out the edges of this frenzied debate. Everyone, and that includes me, has their own perspective of the issue of nuclearwaste, and their own idea of what to do about it.
From a first impression, it is clear that Muller sides with the anti-nuke face of the debate. He opens his case in a fury of intense disputes in favor of his view as the introduction to his essay. I must admit, he was very persuasive and persistent on his case when he added questions like “How can we possibly certify that this material can be kept safe for 100,000 years?” (Muller 207). These questions were purposely targeted to push the reader to answer questions that reinforce his position and push them to take action in some way. Muller went further to say that he felt so strongly about his case that he wasn’t even going “to present the facts and just the facts, and let you draw the conclusions”(Muller 209) because the facts only point strongly toward a particular conclusion. In some ways, though, I find that Muller, himself, seems to be suspended amongst...

...There is no clear description regarding food waste in a universal matter either historically or presently, making it perplexing in definition and comparison. What is clear is that food waste continues to grow at a rapid pace with the expansion of a world population experiencing societal and agricultural developments in an era where land and other resources are becoming more limited. The increase in waste and category of foods which people throw away has transformed with time through the advancement and evolving of varying cultures. The French labeled “Garbage” specifically as food waste and later broadened the term in applying to refuse in general.
The first hunter-gatherer societies picked and killed what they needed to survive, wasting nothing more than animal bones. More than 10,000 years ago, the Neolithic-Revolution gave way to the first cultivation of crops and domestication of animals. Food supply was limited and strenuous work; consequently waste would have been non-existent and contemptible. The first weeding, watering, collecting and seed planting farmers are traced back to roughly 8,000 B.C. The same time period included the introduction of penning animals to be slaughtered and eaten when necessary. Food became more abundant and attainable, but was hardly taken for granted or heedlessly disposed of. American Indians were known for their resourcefully respective nature in dealing with the...

...CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
INTRODUCTION
Chemical waste is managed in various ways, some which are environment friendly and some which are hazardous. It has effects on water supply, fertility of the soil, climate, health of individuals, et.c. What really matters is how well this waste is managed. Chemical waste management typically includes the collection, transportation, processing and recycling/disposal of chemical waste. In past times, it was the role of the country to control chemical waste management but recently it has attracted the concern of some international organizations. The technique that some of these international organizations are trying to inculcate into developing countries is the sound management of chemicals (SMC). Sound management of chemicals (SMC) is the application of managerial best practices to chemicals through their life cycle to prevent and, where this is not possible, to reduce or minimize the potential for exposure of people and the environment to toxic and hazardous chemicals. As each type of waste or chemical demands a unique method for processing and disposing, developing countries often do not recognize or acknoledge this difference. Therefore, these international organizations are working on methods and means by which these developing countries can conform to the standards adopted by the developed countries and...

...wrappers, aluminum cans, gum/gum wrappers, caps, lids, plastic bags, and advertisements and other paper items.
Who is responsible for the problem?
The people most often blamed for littering are teenagers, poorly educated people, and minorities. In reality, studies show that the people who contribute the most to the littering problem are drivers, fast food and grocery customers, and pedestrians that have been walking a far distance. Motorists casually toss garbage out of their car windows. Fast food containers and grocery bags, because there is such a large quantity of them, are commonly littered items. About 49,600,000 plastic bags are littered every year.
Litter is not just laziness on the part of the people. It is also bad waste management and poor jobs being done by sanitation corporations. Overflowing trash receptacles easily allow debris to be scattered around when breezes blow through.
Effects on the environment
Litter has many negative effects on the environment. Wildlife can get trapped in it or mistake if for food and be poisoned by it. Hundreds of thousands of animals die every year from eating discarded plastic bags and other rubbish.
Garbage does not only pollute the ground; it dirties the air and water as well. Decaying matter adds an unpleasant odor to the air and can even decrease the oxygen levels in water. Too much garbage blocks up pipes and drains.
Litter is a fire hazard. Burning cigarettes or matches can...

...1.1.1. Leather industrial waste:
Prominent effectiveness of leather industry is amplified by high input and expenditure but on other side it causes huge waste of resource, incredible environmental pollution and biological chain destruction [17]. Streams of gaseous, liquid and solid waste are resulted by environmental blow of tanneries. Global leather industry generates 4 million tones of solid waste per year [18].
People use products of the leather-processing industry on a daily basis. These include especially shoes, leather and textile goods; we normally encounter leather products even in both public and
private transport. The primary raw material for final products is hide from animals from slaughter houses and hide from game—i.e. waste from the meat industry, which is processed in tanneries and turned into leather. Therefore, the tanning industry can be considered one of the first industries to use and recycle secondary raw materials.
Although the tanning industry is environmentally important as a principal user of meat industry waste, the industry is perceived as a consumer of resources and a producer of pollutants. Processing one metric ton of raw hide generates 200 kg of final leather product (containing 3 kg of chromium), 250 kg of non-tanned solid waste, 200 kg of tanned waste (containing 3 kg of chromium), and 50,000 kg of wastewater (containing 5...

...Utilization of Biodegradable Kitchen Wastes into Organic Fertilizer Using Earthworms
* Abstract
One of the effective means to at least lessen the occurrence of our present garbage disposal problem is through the use of methods that are non-toxic, less expensive, less-harmful, and yet equally effective. This project aims to provide for a natural and effective way of disposing garbage.
During the experiment, kitchen wastes were collected. The materials were shredded and placed in garbage bags with small holes. The temperature inside the bags was allowed to lower.
Three set-ups were prepared and were covered with plastic. The first box contained pure carabao manurd, the second box contained 70 percent carabao manure and 30 percent processed kitchen wastes and the third box contained pure processed kitchen waste. Lumbricus terrestris was placed in each set-up. The boxes were placed in a lighted area while maintaining their moisture. After drying, the Lumbricus terrestris were gathered. The resultant product, called “earthworm castings,” was then sun-dried and passed through a fine sieve to remove foreign materials.
Results showed that the casting from kitchen wastes and manure was highest in percentage total nitrogen, third highest in percentage total P205, and highest in percentage total K20.
It was concluded that organic kitchen wastes can be converted into a competitive organic...