mpgxsvcd: I fail to see how the GH5s is going to be significantly better than the GH5. I am shocked that it doesn't even do UHD @ 60 FPS 10 BIT internal. No IBIS. No ETC at UHD/4K.

This is just a bizarre move by Panasonic.

I honestly have to say that I was wrong on this. I have seen low samples now and I am simply astounded by what it is capable of at VERY high ISO values. I still would miss the features it looses but I can definitely see the High ISO benefit now.

After seeing some low light samples with the GH5s I must say that I am impressed. I was stunned at the difference in high ISO capabilities. I still think some of the things that were removed are a big deal. However, now I also think these low light capabilities are also a big deal.

Sandler: Most samsung tvs are 4k 120hz already. What is missing is content, whether on TV, netflix/youtube or in games that need powerful graphics cards.

No current consumer TV can accept or display a 4K @ 120 FPS signal. One reason for that is that this HDMI specification is required in order to transmit that data.

Honestly, you just saw the bogus spec of 120/240/480 Hz and assumed that means the TV can actually display full resolution at that frequency.iesCurrent TVs can interpolate up to those frequencies. However, they are not capable of accepting 4K @ 120 FPS signals at all at the moment.

mpgxsvcd: Is the G9 limited to SDR50(50 MB/sec) with UHS-I SD cards like the GH5 is?

@stevedo

Where in the article does it mention whether UHS-I cards are limited to less than their full potential? We all know how UHS-II cards will work with this camera. The question is whether UHS-I cards will be artificially limited in this camera like they are in the GH5.

Not a big deal. However, the sentence "there's no essentially no difference between shooting at" in the dynamic range testing page should be corrected. I believe it should be "there's essentially no difference between shooting at".