Where Does Connecticut's Congressional Delegation Stand On Syria?

CaptionU.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Quinnipiac

Andrea Wise / Special to the Courant

"The administration has yet to make a clear and convincing case. I continue to have questions that need to be answered before I make a decision, such as how a military strike protects our national security, and how we avoid any possibility of American troops involved [or] further destabilizing the region."

"The administration has yet to make a clear and convincing case. I continue to have questions that need to be answered before I make a decision, such as how a military strike protects our national security, and how we avoid any possibility of American troops involved [or] further destabilizing the region." (Andrea Wise / Special to the Courant)

"The president made a very persuasive case to me. I told him I would continue to listen...but I also was honest with him and told him I walked into the debate as a skeptic."

"The president made a very persuasive case to me. I told him I would continue to listen...but I also was honest with him and told him I walked into the debate as a skeptic." (Brad Horrigan | Hartford Courant)

Facing intense pressure from the White House and party leaders, members of Connecticut’s congressional delegation said Tuesday they were deeply skeptical but willing to listen arguments in favor of an attack on Syria. For more, read: