All of this is a direct result of mass immigration, as the journalist Mary Wakefield has admitted in the cuckservative Spectator:

In the [London] Evening Standard, Wayne, an ex-gangster from Plumstead, gave an interview in which he explained that the resettled kids from war zones had upped the ante in gangland. ‘In the last ten years, since the Somalis and the Congolese came to London, they taught us a whole new level of violence. These people had seen family members mutilated, so when they said, “I’m gonna smash you up”, us guys would be shouting, “Yo blud [i.e., blood-brother], wot you mean?” and they would just pull out a blade and juk [stab] you in the chest. It upped the speed and level for us British-born guys. We had to arm up to protect ourselves. It created an upward spiral.’

Not Amber Rudd, not Sadiq Khan nor Theresa May would ever speak publicly about this, for fear of seeming racist. But isn’t that in itself racist? It implies that the problem is somehow to do with skin colour, when any poor kid forced into a civil war might well be brutalised by it. We absolutely have a duty to offer asylum to children fleeing horrific circumstances, but we also have a duty to acknowledge the increased dangers the police face as a result. If we don’t, these multiply. (An odd new feeling has crept up on me — sympathy for the police, The Spectator, 21st April 2018)

Why do we “absolutely have a duty to offer asylum to children fleeing horrific circumstances”? In fact, we don’t have any such duty at all. To suggest otherwise is mawkish virtue-signalling that would have been dismissed with contempt not only by that great conservative hero Winston Churchill, but by all mainstream politicians well into the twentieth century. Somalia and the Congo are a very long way from Britain and the “children fleeing horrific circumstances” passed many safe places en route to this country. Now that they are here, they are reproducing the savage and barbarous culture of their homelands.

Virtue-signalling and vibrancy

Is that a surprise? Not to anyone with eyes in their head and brains between their ears. But in the Land of Lies, the wilfully blind are King. And I’m sure that the virtue-signalling Mary Wakefield and her family rarely, if ever, encounter that Somali and Congolese culture at first hand. They will live at a safe distance from the enriched areas of London, allowing the “absolute duty” of welcoming enrichers to fall on other people.

But let’s give the Spectator some credit: it also publishes the Islamophobe Douglas Murray, who has criticized Muslim immigration and even gone so far as to mention the Jewish role therein. He has recently asked a very important question: “Why do politicians refuse to tell it how it is on immigration?” Sadly, his answer was wholly inadequate. The subheading to his article ran: “It is the one issue where our leaders deny the wishes of their citizens.”

That’s like saying that food is the “one issue” where a dog-owner denies the wishes of his dog. If the dog wants food and doesn’t get it, then the owner proves that he is unfit to own a dog. He is failing to meet the dog’s most basic and important need. Similarly, if politicians “deny the wishes of their citizens” on immigration, they prove not only that they are unfit for office but that they are acting with conscious treachery. Immigration is not just “one issue” among many: it is, as Enoch Powell pointed out half-a-century ago, of vital, existential importance, altering a nation and its future in the most direct and intimate way.

Resisting the will of the people

Recall the Labour politician Roy Hattersley, who stood for parliament promising to serve the White working-class in the Birmingham constituency of Sparkbrook. Once elected, he chose to betray his constituents. Decades later, he openly boasted of his treachery in the Guardian: “I was able to resist Sparkbrook’s demands about the great issues of national policy — otherwise, my first decade would have been spent opposing all Commonwealth immigration.”

Hattersley called immigration a “great issue of national policy” because he knew it bore directly on the nation’s future. That was in the 1960s; today the future has arrived. Britain is an authoritarian surveillance state vibrant with the non-White pathologies of terrorism, rape-gangs, violent crime and political corruption. It is a Land of Lies where free speech is dying and the wilfully blind are King. Our new state religion of minority worship insists that Britain has been vastly enriched by mass immigration from violent, corrupt Third-World nations.

For example, where would the National Health Service (NHS) be without doctors and nurses from the Third World? Well, the NHS would be like the rest of Britain: far better off. Non-White doctors and nurses are far more likely to be corrupt and incompetent, particularly if they have acquired their qualifications in such hotbeds of cheating and fraud as India, Pakistan and Nigeria. Britain was the birthplace of modern medicine in the nineteenth century, when highly intelligent and competent Whites like Joseph Lister and Florence Nightingale began to reform a profession that had formerly done more harm than good to its patients. British medicine did not need non-Whites then and does not need them now. The NHS would be better off without them.

“Guilty until proved guilty”

But that is a truth that cannot be spoken. Minority worship is as rampant in the NHS as it is in parliament and at the BBC. White doctors may see that their non-White colleagues are incompetent or corrupt, but they must not act on the evidence of their lying eyes. If they do, they will share the fate of a White surgeon called Peter Duffy, who discovered that Whites who face allegations of racism in the NHS are “guilty until proved guilty”:

Consultant NHS surgeon voted Doctor of the Year ‘was forced to quit his job after three Asian colleagues branded him a racist when he raised concerns about their work’

A consultant NHS surgeon who was voted ‘Doctor of the Year’ was forced to quit his job after being branded a racist by three Asian colleagues, a tribunal heard. Peter Duffy, 56, alleges he was the subject of racism allegations from two Indian consultants Dr Kavinda Madhra and Dr Ashutosh Jain and Pakistani Dr Saleem Nassem.

Dr Duffy told a tribunal he reported one doctor for being unable to use an ultrasound machine, missing ‘several’ cancers and playing golf despite being asked to treat a patient with deadly sepsis. He also said he raised concerns over another he believed had bungled operations and been involved in overtime fraud. But the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust consultant urologist claimed at a tribunal yesterday he was subjected to ‘malicious, toxic and utterly false’ allegations from the three men over his ‘whistleblowing’. …

In a statement given to the Manchester employment tribunal Mr Duffy who is being advised by the whistleblowing charity Public Concern at Work, said he had suffered from heart problems as a result of his treatment and now had ‘chronic’ post traumatic stress disorder. He claimed another senior colleague had stood down after claims of racism were also levelled against him and added: ‘I believe a clear and sustained campaign of victimisation, vilification and disinformation was aimed at me by the clinicians who were responsible for the clinical errors, avoidable deaths and excessive, probably fraudulent work that were the subject of the my repeated protected disclosures. …’

Mass immigration harms White nations not only by increasing crime of all kinds. It also destroys the competence, efficiency and harmony of White institutions, from the health service to the justice system. After all, why would incompetent doctors from an ethnic minority admit their own faults when they can make a highly effective accusation of racism instead? Minority worship means that non-Whites are automatically privileged over their supposed White oppressors. The former Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks has pointed out that Britain’s institutions have been “poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment.” He even admitted that “the process … began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays.”

A false accuser is honoured in Israel

But Rabbi Sacks has been contradicted by the verbose and self-righteous Jewish novelist Howard Jacobson, who has claimed that it would be “sacrilege” for Jews to make false or self-serving claims of anti-Semitism. I think that Jacobson is talking self-deluded nonsense. The Jewish mega-fraudster Robert Maxwell, born Ján Hyman Binyamin Hoch, made repeated accusations of anti-Semitism against those who accused him of fraud and malpractice. These accusations undoubtedly helped Maxwell-Hoch continue and extend his enormous financial crimes. And when he was exposed as one of the biggest fraudsters in history, did the Jewish community condemn his “sacrilege”? Not in the slightest. Maxwell still lies buried on the Mount of Olives in Israel, honoured for his work on behalf of the Jewish state. False accusations of anti-Semitism are very useful to Jews, just as false accusations of racism are very useful to non-Whites throughout the West.

That’s why we see so many hate-hoaxes in Pseudotopias like America, from false accusations of Islamophobia on the New York subway to false accusations of gang-rape at the University of Virginia. At least, sight-criminals like Steve Sailer see the hate-hoaxes. The mainstream media don’t. As Sailer points out, “hate-hoax” isn’t recognized by the mainstream media even as a concept, let alone a widespread reality. But Greg Cochran, another sight-criminal in America, is wrong to speak of “fools,” “barking-mad craziness” and “demented gate-keepers” when he criticizes those who insist on absolute racial equality and the Psychic Unity of Mankind.

Crypsis is not crazy

There is nothing crazy about cultural Marxism, which has steadily and remorselessly tightened its hold on the Western world since the end of the Second World War. As we can see from the careers of Stalin and Mao, denying reality can even be advantageous to ideologues. If you have reality on your side, you may be complacent about victory and feel inclined to be magnanimous to your opponents. If you don’t have reality on your side, you know that the key to victory is not truth but deceit, censorship and intimidation. Cochran condemns “the lies” of men like Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin and Ashley Montagu. But lying is a highly effective strategy in competition, as all biologists should be well-aware. Stick-insects are not really sticks and hornet clearwings are not really hornets.

Instead, they’re defenceless insects that have protected themselves for millions of years by lying to the eyes of hungry predators. Ashley Montagu followed a similar strategy of crypsis, or concealment of one’s true nature. His name — Montague Francis Ashley-Montagu in full — sounds like that of an Old Etonian dandy, heir to an ancient earldom and many acres of Scottish grouseland. That’s not the image conjured by his real name of Israel Ehrenberg. Like Gould and Lewontin, Montagu was Jewish. That’s not a coincidence: Jews have been the hardest-working and most effective promoters of Pseudotopia.

America would not be a Land of Lies without them. Nor would Britain, France, Germany and Sweden. If we want to save the West, then the Land of Lies must turn into the Land of Eyes. We must see racial reality and act on what we see.

Appendix: Martyr-Cults That Didn’t Make It

Liberals claim to be deeply concerned about racism, sexism and bullying. They are lying. In fact, they are deeply concerned about advancing their own power and feeding their own narcissism. That’s why the following victims of violent hate-crime have never prompted martyr-cults like the one that surrounds Stephen Lawrence.

Lucy Lowe, 2000 — a sixteen-year-old English schoolgirl murdered with her mother and sister in an arson attack. The arsonist had been raping her since she was thirteen and had made her pregnant at fourteen. She was pregnant again to him at the time of her death, but feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Lucy Lowe was White and her murderer was a vibrant Pakistani Muslim. (More here)

Kriss Donald, 2005 — a fifteen-year-old Scottish schoolboy abducted by racist thugs simply because of the colour of his skin. After hours of terror, he was repeatedly stabbed, soaked in gasoline, set on fire and left to die in agony. The racist thugs had been emboldened by police inaction against their previous crimes, but anti-racists did not publicize the murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds him. Why so? Because Kriss Donald was White and his murderers were vibrant Pakistani Muslims. (More here)

Kimberly Fuller, 2005 — a nineteen-year-old English girl who was pinched on the buttocks in a nightclub. When she objected to this assault, she was stabbed in the neck by the man responsible and bled to death. Feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Kimberly Fuller was White and her murderer was a vibrant Pakistani Muslim. (More here)

Laura Wilson, 2010 — a seventeen-year-old English girl who, with the full knowledge of the authorities in her home-town of Rotherham, had been “groomed” for sex from the age of twelve by violent misogynists. After her abusers tired of her, she was repeatedly stabbed and thrown into a canal to die. Feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Laura Wilson was White and her murderers were two vibrant Pakistani Muslims. (More here)

Valaree Schwab, not a martyr

Valaree Megan Schwab, 2018 — a sixteen-year-old American schoolgirl who was subject to repeated bullying by a bigoted gang who didn’t like her taste in music. When she tried to stand up to the gang outside a food-shop in New Jersey, she was stabbed twice in the torso with a steak knife and died later in hospital. Anti-bullying activists are not publicizing the murder and we can be confident that there will be no official enquiry and that no martyr-cult will ever surround her. Why so? Because Valaree Megan Schwab was White and her murderer is Black, like the rest of the gang that bullied her. (More here)

Share this entry

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Valaree-Megan-Schwab.jpg580634Tobias Langdonhttps://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.pngTobias Langdon2018-04-26 07:59:482018-06-19 02:53:52In the Land of Lies: Seeing, Saying, and Pseudotopia, Part 2

The MayBot is absolute shabos goy scum. No loyalty to her race & not a Conservative in the sense of preserving our race, culture & values; IOW your typical SJWitch fembot politician.

I couldn’t even watch PMQs yesterday. The dumpy Grey Witch brought up her favorite topic: the lanky drug dealing dindu Lawrence. Never once has DGW mentioned Kris’s Donald.

DGW is a type common in lower middle class Middle England: petty, spiteful, frumpy catlady spinster oblivious to her own ridiculousness. An old, grey hag wearing leopardskin shoes designed for cute, thin, young, blonde models. Yet for some reason the (((MSM))) NEVER call her out on the absurdity of a frumpy grey hag wearing a trouser-suitwith those things!

The MSM gives her an easy time (the opposite of what they give to Trump) and in return she carries out her side of the bargain, which is to do nothing while the enemy within get on with bringing us down. And the saddest aspect of it all is that the people STILL vote for all this to be brought upon themselves even though they do not want it. This is the biggest mystery of all. No-one – not a single person from 100 years ago in any Western country would have predicted that their descendants would willingly and eagerly vote for politicians who openly favour other races over their own.
That is why we cannot always learn from history. Recent times are the only ones in history where races and cultures INVITED over foreign cultures to conquer them. Never before in history has the strong invited the weak to conquer them.

No martyr cult either for 15-year-old Richard Everitt, who was murdered in London in 1994, the year after Stephen Lawrence. He was stabbed by a Bangladeshi gang who ‘felt they had been “wronged” by a white boy and wanted revenge against all white boys and anyone would do. One of Richard’s friends ran to get Richard’s parents. The seven-inch knife wound had penetrated Richard’s heart and lungs and he died cradled in his father’s arms.’

Quotation from Dark Albion, A Requiem for the English by David Abbott.

“My hope is that if we encourage our kids to broaden their social circles, they will be more inclusive and less judgmental. The word “best” encourages judgment and promotes exclusion,” author (((Barbara Greenberg))), a clinical psychologist, wrote.

Minority worship is as rampant in the NHS as it is in parliament and at the BBC. White doctors may see that their non-White colleagues are incompetent or corrupt, but they must not act on the evidence of their lying eyes.

The doctor, and the historically indigenous (ie ‘natives’) of the UK are being shut out of their own country.

According to the Israeli paper excerpted and linked below about settlements in that country a ‘founder’/’settler regime’ enters a country and then uses other ‘imported immigrant’ groups (which the ‘founder’ group dominates) as a weapon to control the natives.

By that description the Jewish people in Britain (whom have a homeland) in regards to the UK are acting as a founder/settler regime there themselves.

…the natives find themselves entirely excluded.

In order to advance the project of nation- and state-building, the new settling regime had to ‘import’ immigrants who entered society at a status lower than the dominant group – the ‘founders’ – but higher than the indigenous ‘natives’.

To advance the project of territorial ethnicization, the immigrants usually serve three main functions: cheap labor to replace native groups; settlement in the ‘frontier’ (periphery); and control over the natives and their land (Stasilius and Yuval-Davis, 1995). These dynamics generally result in the maintenance of hegemony held by the dominant European group (usually identified with ‘the state’), by distancing the immigrants from the centers of capital and political power (McGarry, 1998). Meanwhile, the immigrants are contributing to the important national project of settlement, which provides them with a sense of belonging and certain material gains from the settling state. Culturally and politically, however, they are marginalized, while the natives find themselves entirely excluded (Stasiulis and Yuval-Davis, 1995)

Laura Wilson, 2010 — a seventeen-year-old English girl who, with the full knowledge of the authorities in her home-town of Rotherham, had been “groomed” for sex from the age of twelve by violent misogynists.

Unfortunately there’s been something of a history of having ‘full knowledge’ about this type of thing regarding the British establishment and their doing nothing about it.

And they don’t ‘discriminate’ either.

The report states “within the recorded crimes [of Jimmy Savile] there are 126 indecent acts and 34 rape/penetration offences.” Alleged offences took place at 13 hospitals as well as on BBC premises, according to the report.

The report of the investigations undertaken jointly by the police and the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), Giving Victims a Voice, was published on 11 January 2013. It reported allegations covering a period of fifty years, including 214 alleged acts by Savile which, though uncorroborated, have been formally recorded as crimes, some involving children as young as eight. The report states “within the recorded crimes there are 126 indecent acts and 34 rape/penetration offences.” Alleged offences took place at 13 hospitals as well as on BBC premises, according to the report. In October 2013 it was announced that inquiries had been extended to other hospitals. On 26 June 2014, the Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt, reported on the findings of the investigations led by Kate Lampard. He said that Savile had sexually assaulted victims aged between 5 and 75 in NHS hospitals, and apologised to the victims. Further investigations, in hospitals and elsewhere, led to additional allegations of sexual abuse by Savile.

I’m not sure what the “rationale” is for the Muslim influx but some comments by Jeffrey Sachs on a recent Jimmy Dore video suggest that the refugee crisis is largely the result of the CIA project to get rid of Assad. It’s just amazing how many of our problems can be traced to the friggin’ middle east.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O2TRzA2ezk

Diane Abbot on BBC ‘Kvetching Time’ 26-4-18:
“The Windrush Generation were the MOST PATRIOTIC, MOST HARDEST-WORKING people that Britain has ever seen. Amber Rudd must be sacked,
we owe it to them, the PEOPLE WHO BUILT BRITAIN”
So there you go.
A few thousand Jamaican bus-conductors, factory workers and nurses
“BUILT BRITAIN”, in the 1950s and 1960s.
They worked harder than, and were more patriotic than: The Victorians, The Edwardians, The Georgians, the folks who lived through and died in World War 1 and World War 2, etc etc ,
(none of whom existed anyway, cos Britain wasn’t yet built)https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jDYdr-TrQSQ/maxresdefault.jpg

QT:
1) Windrush / Nog Worship (duration: 25 mins)

2) Anti-Semitism (duration 18 mins ) a “problem across all of society”
“it’s Wrong, it’s a HORRIFIC form of WAYCISSUMZ…and we’ve SEEN THE HORRORS that it can lead to ” “I’ve spent a lifetime fighting waycizzumz, anti-semitissumz, and disquiminayshunz of all kinds”

3)Trump (duration 14 mins ) ‘Is it time to admit that we accept Trump is POTUS ?’
(cue-Trump-hate…”he has small fingers, he spreads hate..!” )

4) Brexit……..or Brexisnt.
Caroline Lucas gets loudly BOOED for suggesting a “People’s Vote” ,
so there’s a flicker of life in the patient

Tony Hayers: ‘There is a flicker of life’
The patient is a lion lying down. It is being attacked by fleas who are taking its things and biting it. But the only reason this continues is because THE LION LETS THEM – in fact it asked them to to these things to it. As soon as the lion has had enough, it can easily and swiftly stop and reverse all the nonsense. But the lion will have to do something about the causes that put it in this self-harming trance in the first place, ie its enemy within.

Somalia and the Congo are a very long way from Britain and the “children fleeing horrific circumstances” passed many safe places en route to this country. Now that they are here, they are reproducing the savage and barbarous culture of their homelands….Is that a surprise? Not to anyone with eyes in their head and brains between their ears. But in the Land of Lies, the wilfully blind are King. And I’m sure that the virtue-signalling Mary Wakefield and her family rarely, if ever, encounter that Somali and Congolese culture at first hand.

Mrs Wakefield is engaging in ‘crimestop’ as defined by Orwell. Can’t be too hard on her, just trying to protect herself and her family and all. Indeed she’s to be complimented on her duckspeak technique. She’s a doubleplusgood duckspeaker!

Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.

Ultimately it was hoped to make articulate speech issue from the larynx without involving the higher brain centres at all. This aim was frankly admitted in the Newspeak word duckspeak, meaning ‘to quack like a duck’.

Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity…

…Relative to our own, the Newspeak vocabulary was tiny, and new ways of reducing it were constantly being devised. Newspeak, indeed, differed from most all other languages in that its vocabulary grew smaller instead of larger every year. Each reduction was a gain, since the smaller the area of choice, the smaller the temptation to take thought. Ultimately it was hoped to make articulate speech issue from the larynx without involving the higher brain centres at all. This aim was frankly admitted in the Newspeak word duckspeak, meaning ‘to quack like a duck’. Like various other words in the B vocabulary, duckspeak was ambivalent in meaning. Provided that the opinions which were quacked out were orthodox ones, it implied nothing but praise, and when the Times referred to one of the orators of the Party as a doubleplusgood duckspeaker it was paying a warm and valued compliment.

In other words, Whites are the slaves of non-Whites. They must work to serve non-Whites, not themselves. They must do what is best for non-Whites, not for themselves. They must put the needs and desires of non-Whites before their own needs and desires.

It is evil for Whites to resist being enslaved.

This Satanic doctrine is continually preached by the Jewish media.

Newspaper control … by the Jews is not a matter of money. It is a matter of keeping certain things out of the public mind and putting certain things into it. — Henry Ford’s The International Jew; vol. 1, chapter 17

If you believe that, then endorse and hand over every pay-check that you earn to a homeless person. He has the right to use as much of the money as he wishes. If he wants, he can give you what is left over.

Remember, he comes before you. His needs are more important than your needs. Don’t put yourself first; put him first. It is your duty to be his slave.

“others before self”

If you believe that, then let some homeless people move into your home. Some of them may be homosexual, and they may want and need to sodomize you daily. Don’t deny them their pleasure; their desires come before yours. Put them first and yourself last.

We all know that you will not do these things, but you will probably continue to pretend that you put others before yourself.

“Charity begins at home.”

Let’s say that some Jews want to destroy a White nation—to genocide the people of a country. One way to accomplish that is to brainwash the Whites into believing that they have no right to defend themselves from biologically alien invaders—no right to defend themselves from genocide.

If the murder of one man is evil, then the genocide of a White nation is Satanically evil.

“The goal is to meet the EU challenge of interracial marriage. It’s not a choice. It’s an obligation. If voluntarism does not work for the republic, then the state will move in with more coercive measures.” — the Jew Nicolas Sarkozy

“Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century…. They are now going into a multicultural mode. Jews will be resented because of our leading role.” — the Jewess Barbara Spectre

[A]n unholy alliance of leftists, capitalists, and Zionist supremacists has schemed to promote immigration and miscegenation with the deliberate aim of breeding us out of existence in our own homelands…. [T]he real aim stays the same: the biggest genocide in human history…. — Nick Griffin

“Our new state religion of minority worship…”.
I’m afraid that I must disagree, Mr. Langdon. The state religionof all of the “Western liberal democracies” is Holocaustianity. Minority worship is part of that religion, as the survivors and their seed, who are a minority, must be worshiped above all others. They are the holiest of the holies, and thus chosen. Without Holocaustianity, minority worship would not exist.

Anglos and the rest of Anglosphere (America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) are doomed. Even wars are now back on the menu at the White House with the likes of John Bolton.

Jews are the destroying everything and the saddest part is Anglos are too afraid of saying anything for fear of being called a racist or anti-Semite.

The other difficulty with Anglosphere is mentality. I once shared a flight with someone from Scotland. When I tried to chat about the dangers of losing one’s identity under so-called multiculturalism, He got upset and adamantly replied “We are all immigrants from somewhere”. He then gave me the usual lecture on “helpjng refugees”, the past “evils” of Germany and how his grandfather fought bravely in the UK Royal Navy. I just gave up. I have met many like him who think they are superior compared everyone else on moral issues.

Realistically Europe, especially from the East has higher chances of survival long-term than Anglosphere.

Florian, you should have asked Scotty, whether his brave grandfather served on any of the RN destroyers protecting shipping entering the newly declared war-zone of the Irish Channel; withdrawn by Churchill, on the advice of Captain Morgan and his confidant Johnny Walker, in order to afford the U-Boot a better shot at the Lusitania, arousing aimed-for American anger over its passenger losses.

Or perhaps asked him whether he served God, Country and the City of Westminster and Wall Street at the U-Boots turkey shoot inside of ‘ impregnable ‘ Scapa Flow: though this might have proven foolish at such close quarters and already so close to God at your plane’s altitude.

None of which diminishes my sorrow for their individual and familial losses and political abuse, as it pulses for those of our side in this suicidal brotherly equation: Russians who opposed that swine Ehrenburg, or merely ignored him, included.

And these types of Scots and Irish and Welsh do not seem to mind being ruled by the EU or ruled by arabs or out-bred by arabs or others from the third world, but strongly object to the English having any influence over them.
In the same way there are Indians with Indian surnames and Indian great-grandparents who were forced by the sword to convert to Islam and a few generations later slag off the British – who never sought to convert them – but never their muslim conquerors.
Like the Sudanese who are African yet seem strangely loyal to the arabs who conquered them.

Once many years ago in a library I picked up a volume by “Ashley Montagu” that had all the appearance of a scientific and scholarly work addressing some aspect of human nature – I forget what, maybe aggression. I read the preface where Mr. Ehrenberg stated that in the present volume he intended to write a book not of how man is but as he should be. At which point I returned the book to the shelf.

HK. Like them, who removed a two volumes biography by Cyrus Adler, here and there too insightful, of his intimate friend Jacob Schiff, from the stacks of the Ottawa Main Library, three weeks after their acquisition, you ‘ could ‘ have borrowed it, forever, on a new, fictitious library card.

I shouldn’t be surprised, if Ehrenburg, that greatest misanthrope and common swine of modern times lectured the devil himself for a handsome fee. Nor am I at all surprised, that he would presume to write a book, presumably based on Judaism’s superior morality, to lecture and advise mankind out of the other side of his mouth. A tribal psychopathy often enough discussed here.

My vehemence regarding this satanic Jewish swine stems from having been on the receiving end of his diabolic exhortations, particularly in the daily Red Army’s RED STAR, starting on April 21, 1945, after having been overrun by them: literally twenty feet off the road; accompanied by a very pretty, brunette 17 year-old sister.

Figure out the rest.

Swine Ehrenburg needn’t have written that book, if he did, since his tribe already transformed us according to their preconception of what we should be like: the better to serve them.