Explain how civil unions are unequal? What rights is the state denying to people in a civil union?

In places were civil unions exist, there's tons of organizations/employers that won't recognize them. That's why separate but equal hasn't worked, and will never work. Creating separate systems inherently makes them unequal. That people come in and think Jim Crow for gays will surely work this time is laughable.

__________________
The large print giveths and the small print taketh away.

In places were civil unions exist, there's tons of organizations/employers that won't recognize them. That's why separate but equal hasn't worked, and will never work. Creating separate systems inherently makes them unequal. That people come in and think Jim Crow for gays will surely work this time is laughable.

So your goal is to force your beliefs on marriage onto private organizations. I thought only conservatives did that?

EDIT: And if marriage is just a private contract why do you need to force private organizations to recognize it anyway?

So your goal is to force your beliefs on marriage onto private organizations. I thought only conservatives did that?

EDIT: And if marriage is just a private contract why do you need to force private organizations to recognize it anyway?

You're a twisted and disgusting individual to think ensuring equality is "forcing beliefs." It's you though so that's expected; there's no point talking rational things with you since you're simply not, and this is exemplary of it. Hint: See the 1960s to see how those sort of arguments worked out.

__________________
The large print giveths and the small print taketh away.

You're a twisted and disgusting individual to think ensuring equality is "forcing beliefs." It's you though so that's expected; there's no point talking rational things with you since you're simply not, and this is exemplary of it. Hint: See the 1960s to see how those sort of arguments worked out.

Do you care to point out where gay couples are not allowed to eat?

Or not allowed to vote?

What you want to do is to force private individuals to recognize other people's "private" contract. Well pretending you do not want to force your beliefs on others.

And I believe asking for evidence that interracial marriages were considered to be counter to the definition of marriage, as opposed to merely wrong. None has been provided.

Why is it so hard for you to at least be honest an admit you want to change the definition of marriage and force everyone else to recognize it?

What does it matter that current definitions as some hold them deny someone their rights? The problem is people's rights not being equal, and you're just showing your idiocy or intellectual dishonesty further trying to come up with such a roundabout argument to justify Jim Crow laws.

__________________
The large print giveths and the small print taketh away.

What does it matter that current definitions as some hold them deny someone their rights? The problem is people's rights not being equal, and you're just showing your idiocy or intellectual dishonesty further trying to come up with such a roundabout argument to justify Jim Crow laws.

Everyone has equal rights. Everyone is allowed to marry a single unrelated person of the opposite gender.

Some people want a new right to marry a single person of the same gender.

Some people want a new right to marry multiple people of the opposite gender.

Some people want a new right to marry their sibling.

Some people want a new right to marry their furniture.

Why does only one group deserve a new right? That seems rather unequal to me.