(CNSNews.com) – A federal judge in Ohio ruled Friday that a lawsuit filed against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for allegedly engaging in “viewpoint discrimination” while processing applications for tax exempt status by ten conservative groups has “a likelihood of success on the merits”.

“The evidence strongly suggests that the IRS initiated the delay because TPTP’s application was perceived at the screening state to be a Tea Party case,” the judge wrote in his 29-page ruling, which was publicly released last week.

On May 10, 2013 Lois Lerner, the former director of IRS Exempt Organizations,publicly acknowledged that the IRS had been targeting conservative groups.

On May 14, 2013, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration(TIGTA) concluded in a report that the IRS used “inappropriate criteria” to identify and slow down the tax-exempt applications of certain organizations for further review, including those having “Tea Party”, “Patriots” of “9-12” in their titles or groups that wanted to limit government spending and were opposed to higher taxes.

An analysis by The Washington Post found that “groups with the word progressive in their names suffered no similar slowdown pattern.”

Barrett quoted a 2015 court ruling stating that “processing applications ‘pursuant to different standards and at different rates depending on the viewpoint of the applicants [is] a blatant violation of the First Amendment’…” adding that “the loss of First Amendment freedoms causes irreparable injury.”

The class action lawsuit was filed on Aug. 5, 2013 against the IRS and the Treasury Department on behalf of ten conservative groups, including TPTP, that had applied for tax-exempt status. TPTP is the last member of the class whose tax exemption is still pending.

It’s one of three outstanding lawsuits accusing the IRS of illegally targeting conservative groups. Two other cases were dismissed but later reinstated on appeal.

The IRS claimed that it could not consider TPTP’s application because of the litigation. But Barrett said the government could not “see the forest through the trees when it uses the existence of this lawsuit as grounds to continue the delay that is the subject of this lawsuit.”

“Elements within the Executive Branch of the federal government… brought the vast powers, incomprehensible complexity, and crushing bureaucracy of the IRS to bear on groups of citizens whose only wrongdoing was their presumed dissent from the policies or ideology of the Administration. In other words, these citizens were targeted based upon their political viewpoints.”

The result was “a chilling and muzzling of free speech and association,” the lawsuit continued.

Citizens for Self-Governance president Mark Meckler told CNSNews.com that his group funded the litigation because “I saw all these organizations making money from the Tea Party targeting, but nobody was doing anything about it.”

Meckler said that besides holding up their applications for tax-exempt status, sometimes for years, the IRS also harassed the conservative groups with “a huge list of outrageous demands,” including demands for their donor lists, reading lists, and even what prayers they said at their meetings.

Small Tea Party organizations with limited staff and funds found it very difficult to comply with the tax agency’s demands, Meckler pointed out.

“A lot of groups just shut down,” he said.

“Their intention was clear. The IRS intended to do everything it could to shut down the Tea Party movement before the 2012 election. And they were very successful,” he told CNSNews.

Meckler said that he is “very optimistic” that the conservative groups will win in court, but added that “I’m less optimistic that justice will be done if nobody pays the price.”

Even if the conservative groups “are vindicated and hopefully compensated” for the IRS’ actions, there’s “not much” to prevent the agency from targeting conservative groups in the future, he pointed out.

“I worry about that,” he told CNSNews. “This is a symptom of a broken government, a symptom of tyranny. And it doesn’t stand alone. It goes along with other [government] abuses.”

State Laws
When people think about the law, some of the first things that come to mind might be the Constitution or the Supreme Court. However, the fact is that most of our interactions with legal issues and the law actually involve matters of state and local laws

The American Civil Rights Union
The American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) is dedicated to protecting the civil rights of all Americans by publicly advancing a Constitutional understanding of our essential rights and freedoms.

The Federalist Society
The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies is a group of conservatives and libertarians interested in the current state of the legal order.

The Innocence Project
The Innocence Project is a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted individuals through DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice.

The Rutherford Institute
The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties organization based in Charlottesville, Va., is deeply committed to protecting the constitutional freedoms of every American and integral human rights of all people through legal and education programs

The Thomas More Law Center
Thomas More Law Center mission is to: Preserve America’s Judeo-Christian heritage; freedom of Christians; sanctity of human life; strong National Defense ; a free and sovereign USA