Symantec has released a blog entry "Month of Apple Bugs Overview", its summary type entry is located at
http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/security_response/weblog/2007/02/mont
h_of_apple_bugs_overview.html

The entry includes "a small diagram illustrating how many issues affected Apple applications

Apple has released an official document Apple Software versions and Microsoft Windows compatibility.
The table included to the document was last updated last week, on 2nd February.
iTunes being discussed widely is not the only software when checking the Vista compatibility.

I would doubt that considering the presentation was getting press a month
before it was given and nobody knew the demo was to be done on a Mac. We
were most often told by observers they were sure that the demo would be done
against an intel or boradcom chipset on a PC. Most people I meet know barely

> Please understand that I'm not referring to the average Mac user
> that just wants a safe, reliable computing experience. I'm taking
> exception with zealots who place those users at risk by giving them
> a false sense of security. OS X is pretty safe today for the
> average user, but the

I agree that the claim appears to be related to the current MoAB
project (now completed), but it suggests that Bill hasn't actually
looked at what the MoAB actually produced (versus what they claimed
to want to do). The claim of relative userbase being a

Regardless, it was a stupid thing to say. If Mr. Gates wants to come off as
an arrogant ass, then let him. But this type of statement is all that
groups will need to justify 0day publication of vulnerabilities now. MS
will call it "irresponsible disclosure" and blame the OP's for anything bad
tha