Stand-up in support of those fighting corruption and excess sentences in Cook County Courts

Update 12/9/16: UPDATE – On 12/9/16 Judge Cannon granted Motion to rewrite the order denying Motion to Declare Battery statute unconstitutional so that Shelton can immediately appeal it; however, when a crazy detainee bolted and ran into Shelton trying to escape on 12/9/16 Shelton was slightly injured and hearing rescheduled for 1/20/17 when order will be written and Shelton will finish her argument that charges are void due to prosecutor’s fraud upon the grand jury.

COME TO COURT and stand-up for an activist under siege from false charges and defamation of character meant to shut her up, who has been working behind the scenes to expose judicial, prosecutorial, and police misconduct in the Chicago area for 15 years.

Dr. Shelton is a behind the scenes activist for court reform, civil rights, and rights of minorities, poor, and disabled. Come to court12/9/16, room 506, 2600 S. California, Chicago at 10 AM and stand-up for her to show support for her fight against false arrest and abuse of minorities, poor, and disabled; against extortion of defendants by State charging exorbitant fees for processing bail bond; and against false arrest, malicious prosecution, and biased profiling of citizens.

Come to next court date 12/9/16 at 10 am rm 506. 2600 S California, Chicago, for argument that indictment should be stricken for fraud upon the grand jury by the State’s Attorney in failing to present fact that alleged act of “touching an officer’s ear” was induced/triggered by the Sheriff Courtroom Deputies violating ADA accommodations for disabled Shelton in that they pushed her, causing her to lose balance, and triggered a PTSD flashback, causing her to cower and waive her hands around her head believing she was being attacked.

UPDATE: 7/13/16 Judge Cannon denied motion to declare battery statute unconstitutional and defied higher courts by failing to state why this order was not immediately appealable, so Shelton cannont appeal this order until the end of the case. She has filed a motion to clarify the order and follow higher court precedent and declare that there is no reason to delay appeal of this order.

Shelton’s argument for her motion to declare the IL battery statutes unconstitutional was rebutted by the state in June with the comment that they “stand on their pleadings.” Judge Cannon will issue her written opinion on the motion on 7/13/16, after taking the motion to declare the battery statute unconstitutional “under advisement” – see below. Read motion States Attorney Anita Alvarez has been totally unresponsive to Shelton’s concerns about unlawful arrests, malicious prosecutions, and illegal acts by Sheriff and police.

Sheriff Dart is a hypocrite in condoning his Sheriff Staff’s attack against whistle blowers and activists, defaming them with false claims of mental illness and false crimes of battery of officers and won’t discuss this with the press or his Staffs’ victims. He condones State’s Attorney Alvarez’ misconduct in office by helping to cover up officer misconduct, excessive force, medical neglect and abuse at the jail.

Cook County (Chicago) courts are full of false charges, malicious prosecutions of poor, disabled, minorities, and whistle blowers, as well as run by incompetent, corrupt, and bribed judges and attorneys. Judges and attorneys went to jail for this corruption and bribery 30 years ago in the famous “Greylord” prosecutions, but it still is as active as ever.

States Attorney Anita Alvarez charged Chicago Police Officer Servin with involuntary manslaughter for killing Rekia Boyd instead of the appropriate charge of murder. Judge Porter dismissed the involuntary manslaughter charge stating that the act was murder as he willfully fired into a crowd of people and dismissed the involuntary manslaughter charge. As he can’t be charged with a higher charge for the same crime, this officer got away with murder. Officer Servin was off duty on the night of March 21, 2012, when he got into a verbal altercation over loud music with a group of people gathered in a West Side alley. He said he felt in fear for his life when he fired over his shoulder into the crowd. One of the shots killed bystander Rekia Boyd, 22.

Yet SA Alvarez is charging Linda Shelton, a disabled activist, with felony aggravated battery to an officer for, in a courtroom, allegedly “touching an officer’s ear” with no injury. This brings a sentence of 3-14 years in prison if convicted.

Yet, the State through the court disability coordinator knew before the court date that I have multiple physical disabilities and use a walker –

(INCLUDING BALANCE ISSUES so when I’m push I reach out and grab with my hands to try and steady myself)

as well as that I have post-traumatic-stress disorder due to being beaten by police.

Shelton gave her a letter from Shelton’s psychiatrist who treated her for PTSD that states that Shelton “misperceive ongoing events” if the PTSD FLASHBACKS are triggered, that she cower and tries to protect herself with her arms waving around her head!

The courtroom SHERIFF STAFF PURPOSELY GRABBED SHELTON AND PUSHED HER TO TRIGGER A FLASHBACK then failed to “stand back” and give her time to “recover her mental equilibrium” and become aware of where she was, as recommended by her physician in this letter.

The sheriff staff and judge knew this before court – purposely triggered a flashback and therefore knew Shelton could not have conscious intent to “harm” and officer or make”insulting or provoking contact”. As this alleged crime would be a misdemeanor, since the “victim” was an officer, the SA raised the charge to a felony!!!

This was a violation of federal law as the court was REQUIRED to accommodate Shelton’s disabilities as she requested and listen to her doctor’s letter.

SHOW OUTRAGE AT THIS KIND OF CONDUCT BY THE SHERIFF STAFF AND STATES ATTORNEY!

Come to court and stand in gallery to show support for Dr. Linda Shelton who writes this blog and several other blogs exposing Cook County Court, Sheriff and police misconduct and crimes including http://cookcountyjudges.wordpress.com and http://chicagofbi.wordpress.com. Shelton needs a large grass roots effort to protect her so these web sites are not shut down. Show support for her fight against false arrest, excessive force, excessive sentencing, lack of rehabilitation, lack of restorative justice, illegal bond retention statute, unconstitutional battery statute, illegal procedures in divorce and probate court, wrongful theft of estates from elderly by court-appointed guardians.

Fantastic news is that on Sept. 30, Shelton argued her motion to declare part of the Illinois Bail statute unconstitutional which allows the state to keep 10% of the bail bond paid, as a fee for processing the bond, despite the fact that it costs the same amount to process a $100 bond check as a $30,000 bond check.

So it is exploitation & fraud to charge one person $10 and the other $3,000 for this one service, whether they are innocent or guilty. In Illinois if you pay 10% of the bail (i.e. the bail bond) you can get out of jail pretrial on bond, but if you don’t show up for court, the state can declare that you forfeited the whole amount of bail ($300,000 for which you pay $30,000 to get out of jail) and then go after collecting it from you. Read the motion that will be argued here.

Judge Cannon said she was going to grant this motion – but then she entered and continued it after the argument was over saying that Shelton didn’t have standing because the clerk had not yet withheld the money. That is baloney as the clerk has already collected the bond money so by statute must keep the 10% fee. A new law will go into effect in Jan. 2016 that in counties greater than 3 million people the clerk may not keep more than $100 of the bond, but this still means the law is unconstitutional. Judge Cannon acted illegally by continuing her ruling until the end of the case.

Hear Judge Cannon’s written opinion on Shelton’s motion on 7/13/16 in court rm 506, 2600 S. California, 10 am. On 5/9/16,, Shelton argued her motion that the IL aggravated battery statute is unconstitutional. She needs a continued big audience 4 her case – PLEASE APPEAR IN THE GALLERY.

We must stand together against the Cook County INJUSTICE SYTEM!!

Now they are trying to shut me up by charging me with felony battery for “touching an officer’s ear” during a PTSD flashback the officers triggered using information they received from the court disability coordinator – where I requested disability accommodations including not doing things that trigger flashbacks and backing-off if a flashback occurred until it passed as recommended by psychiatrist Dr. Robert Galatzer-Levy. The Cook County Courts pervasively refuse to accommodate litigants’ disabilities and use their disabilities against them.

Possible sentence up to 14 years is outrageous, disproportionate and unconstitutional. I also have motions challenging the bond retention statute as unconstitutional and the battery statute as unconstitutional. Come to court and stand in gallery – help me fill gallery – or the judge will blatantly violate the constitution and laws if there are few witnesses. Help me get press coverage!! Help me please as much as possible get this covered. Next hearing on case 12 CR 22504 is 1/20/17,, room 506 10 am 2600 S California, Chicago, IL

[…] Help me (Shelton) now by showing up to court hearings (NEXT one 5/25/16 room 506 10 AM 2600 S California – though judge hears others first and waits until gallery empty so there will be no witnesses to her illegal rulings), giving Shelton support in pending case: click here […]

Corrupt judges regularly fix cases in favor of its parties of interests in IL Courts. Chancery Judge Robert E. Senechalle, Jr., who is Mr. Michael Madigan’s protege, fixed my fraudulent foreclosure in favor of the bank. Senechalle trespassed all applicable laws, including his own standing Order and helped Wells Fargo bank lawyers to withhold documents from the case which was based on forged robo-signed documents (read: he defrauded me and Appeal Court justices who reviewed incomplete case file). Now Municipal judge Moltz is trespassing all applicable laws to help Wells Fargo bank to obtain a reward for their fraud; while Senechalle threatened me with sanction because I filed absolutely lawful Petition under Rule 1401 to vacate his void Order. Judge Martin Paul Moltz was repeatedly sued for corruption and racket in Federal Court, cases 04-CV-50355 and 15-CV=6111 Solomon v. Wells Fargo, Judge Moltz, et.al, (this case was filed in respond to case 14-M1-722380, which was mysteriously SEALED in court records. Thus, Moltz have a flagrant conflict of interests to be involved in my case – but he proceed without any shame and with total impunity. Moltz is trespassing all applicable laws to help Wells Fargo bank to obtain its reward for fraud ; while Senechalle threatened me with sanction because I filed absolutely lawful Petition under Rule 1401 to vacate his void Order. I have only one confidence in this corrupt Court – the first person to defraud me will be a judge.

Defendant has his workstation facing the large window that faces the back yard on his home. Defendant first heard what sounded like someone walking close to the window that faces the back yard. Defendant first thought it was some animal walking past the window. One night, defendant heard firewood fall from the stack next to the sliding glass door fall from the stack. Defendant then quietly walked out the front door with his dog and a flashlight moving quickly to the back yard. Defendant saw a man, about 5 feet, 10 inches tall, wearing tan slacks and a blue, short sleeved, knit Polo shirt run through the wooded lot to the other street, turned and ran South.
• The next incident happened about a couple of weeks after the above incident. Defendant was watching TV when his dog, Karma walked to the sliding glass door facing the back yard with her ears perked forward looking at the sliding glass door. Defendant then quietly got up with flashlight in had opened the front door, then quickly went to the back yard and again saw the same man, dressed in the manner running toward the wooded lot, turned and again ran South as he had in the previous incident. There were other incidents were defendant would hear some one walking out side near his house in the back yard. Defendant would then wait to see if anyone would attempt to enter his home. These incidents continued until the temperature became very cold.
• On one evening, about four (4) weeks prior to the May 28, 2014 hearing, defendant had gone fishing at the Rock River in Dixon. Defendant stayed late as the Walleye were biting. When defendant returned around Midnight, he walked into his house to find furniture had been moved and the cable to his TV had been removed. I took my dog all over the house thinking the intruder may still be inside the house. I found no one in the house and no brakeage indicating a forced entry. I could not find any items missing that could be sold were missing from his house.
• Defendant asserts that he keeps a box file with hanging folders under one of the desk in his workroom. This box file was set up with the sole purpose of defending my foreclosure against Bank of America, N.A., now to be known as (BANA). The files were labeled: Service of Process and Foreclosure Defense. The Service of Process file contained many cases of law of which was about four inches thick. The other file, Foreclosure Defense was large as well containing my documents alleging fraud on the part of BANA in pursuit of foreclosing on my home. There were several payment coupons defendant had kept he received from BANA with mode of payment stapled to the top of each payment coupon. One payment coupon was for $1473 and some cents. There other payment coupons exceeded $1800. These payment coupons represented most of defendant’s assertions that BANA had forced him into foreclosure by fraudulently increases payments so he could not afford to make these inflated payments therefore, violating defendant’s contract forcing him into foreclosure. BANA and former attorney, Al Williams had knowledge of these files and the payment coupons. Green Tree Servicing, having taken over servicing of defendant’s mortgage from BANA must have knows of these payment coupons as well because, at this stage of the foreclosure proceedings, Green Tree Servicing, LLC would be the only entity interested in stealing defendant’s payment coupons.
• On or about three (3) weeks prior to the May 28, 2014 hearing, defendant pulled out the box file under one of his desk in the workroom to find all files missing. I looked everywhere in the house first thinking he may have taken the files out and not replaced the files in the box file. Having found no trace of the missing files, I determined that the BANA files were taken when the intruder entered his home with the skills to pick locks.
• Defendant asserts that when he talked to his neighbors concerning the aforementioned incidents, not one had experienced any incidents whatsoever and that his neighbors informed him it would do not good to call the police as nothing of salable value had been stolen.
• On the night of May 25, 2014 around 11:30 p.m., defendant was washing dishes at the kitchen sink when he heard loud shots being fired from a large caliber gun very close to the kitchen window that over looks the back yard. I then poised to listen to for bullets striking the house. Hearing no bullets hit the house, I went quickly to the front door, turned on the high beam outside lights above the garage door; went outside to see someone running West in the ditch along the street into the darkness. Defendant’s dog gave chase to the shooter, but I called her back not wanting her to get shot.
• Defendant grew up shooting all kinds of guns hunting with his father and brothers. My father was an avid hunter and gun dealer, therefore I am familiar with the sounds of all kinds of guns. The gun the person used to fire of shoots next to my house was a 30.06 caliber or higher.
• The next day, May 26, 2014, defendant, not being able to get any sleep, left his house and drove to the Rock River near the dam to fish and try to settle his nerves. I was gone about an hour and a half and upon walking to the front door, saw a sticker placed on the window next to the door. The sticker read” IMPORTANT! We have found this property to be vacant/abandoned. This information will be reported to the mortgage holder. The mortgage holder has the right and duty to protect this property. The property may be rekeyed and/or winterized with 3 days. If this property is NOT VACANT, please contact Safeguard Properties at 877-340-8482. Defendant called the phone number with no response. I then went to my neighbor’s house across the street and asked John Bonnell if he had seen anyone around my house. Mr. Bonnell informed me that as soon as I left my house, a Silver Hyundai SUV pulled up in the driveway. A man got out of the SUV and proceeded to walk around the house holding some kind of instrument.
• Defendant returned to his house and again tried to call the 877-340-8482 phone number on the sticker left by the man with no success. I then found the website of Safeguard Properties, LLC. I then filled out Contact Us form submission on their website.
• On or about May 27, 2014, defendant called Safeguard’s phone number1-800-852-8306 x 1224 located on the email sent to me. I was transferred to another “Resolution Specialist” that informed me that Safeguard Properties was informed that your house was vacant and the electricity was shut off. I then asked the women who hired you? She responded, “Green Tree”. I then informed Resolution Specialist that Green Tree knew the house was not vacant and the electricity was never shut off because I had spoke to a customer service representative from Green Tree on or about the last week of April, 2014.
• Defendant stays in contact with people he found on a website, piggybankblog.com that have problems with BANA. We exchange all kinds of information concerning BANA’s illegal foreclosing tactics. On or about May 26, 2014 I emailed Isabel with questions regarding Safeguard Properties, LLC. Isabel responded with an email concerning her horrible experiences with Safeguard Properties, LLC.
• Defendant performed an internet search of Safeguard Properties and found where the Illinois Attorney General had filed a lawsuit against them for illegally picking the locks on home owner’s doors; removing all kinds of items from their homes and then changing the locks so the home owners cannot get into their homes. The Illinois Attorney General’s lawsuit can be found at: hrrp://illinisattorneygeneral.gov./pressroom/2013_09/SAFEGARD_PROPERTIES_COMPLAINT_09-09-2013-15-51- 37.pdf filed in Cook County, The People of the State of Illinois v. Safeguard Properties, LLC, 2013CH20715.
• During the May 5, 2014 hearing, Judge Fish appeared to be interested in defendant’s Motion to Find Unconstitutional Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law and asked me if I would send him the case law I intended to present at the May 28, 2014 hearing. Defendant complied with Judge Fish’s request and mailed him the following: Best v. Taylor Machine Works, 689 N.E.2nd 1057, and Quaker Cab Company v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 277 US 389 (1928), Robinson v. Johnson, 346 III. App.3d 895, 809 N.E.2nd 123 (2003) City of Chicago v. Morales, 687 N.E.2nd 53, and O’Connell v. St. Francis Hospital, 492 N.E.2nd 1322.
• Defendant had previously filed Motion for Leave to Show Cause Motion to Amend Motion to Dismiss in April, 2013. In the first line of said motion, I stated that I have Lyme’s Disease, therefore, Judge Fish was aware of defendant’s disabling disease as follows: 1. On of about the first week of September, 2011, defendant was home suffering from the neurological effects of Lyme Disease having been diagnosed July 28, 2011 by A. Eastman, S.M.A. of Whiteside County Health Clinic, Rock Falls, Illinois.
• Defendant, on the day of the hearing, May 28, 2014, had very little sleep from the accelerated intimidations and had no sleep before the day of the hearing. I was under extreme duress during the hearing informing Judge Fish that I was having problems talking.
• Defendant, after struggling to speak, I concluded his presentation. Plaintiff’s argument amounted to defendant’s reliance of criminal case law was in error. Judge Fish then agreed with plaintiff. Judge Fish could not have read any of the case law I sent him because in Best v. Taylor Machine Works, (citations) utilized criminal as well as civil case law to arrive at their opinion. Likewise the court in Giaccio v. Pennsyvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) held, (a) Regardless of whether the Act is “penal” or “civil”, it must meet the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment. P. 402
• Defendant asserts that Judge Fish would not allow me to rebut plaintiff’s argument and proceeded to deny my motions in about four (4) seconds. Then the scene in the courtroom turned surreal. It became obvious that Judge Fish and plaintiff’ attorney, Michael Downey had planned their tactics before the hearing. Judge Fish then started chuckling as the plaintiff’s attorney was shuffling papers for the order to allow Green Tree as plaintiff and granted plaintiff’s motion for foreclosure, order of default and sale. Judge Fish could hardly contain his exuberance.
• Defendant informed Judge Fish in general of the acts of intimidation and vandalism he had to endure prior to the May 28, 2014 hearing. Judge Fish made a weak apology for my “misfortunes” and then denied my request for more time to prepare for his foreclosure defense. Judge Fish was both biased and prejudice against defendant where he allowed the plaintiff four (4) extensions of time.
• Judge Fish was both biased and prejudice when he denied both defendant’s Motion to Find Unconstitutional HB1960, 735 ILCS 5/15-1505.6 (West 2010) of the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law and the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law and to Supplement and Amend said motion. Judge Fish mocked defendant by making fun of the language I used in titling my motions. By Judge Fish denying said motions, he was in effect ruling in favor of defendant’s claim that, under Illinois law, there is no due process pursuant to 735 ILCA 5/15-1505.6 as Judge Fish would not allow affiant any time to show “good cause” after 60 days of defendant filing his appearance, thereby denying me my right to due process of law under the 14th Amendment. Judge Fish was therefore biased and prejudice against defendant by not allowing me any time to show good cause for late filing any challenges to the courts jurisdiction.
• Judge Fish ruled that defendant submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court by filing my appearance and I was properly served. Judge Fish was prejudiced against defendant because filing an appearance does not constitute submitting defendant to jurisdiction of the court because I have only filed motions of issues pursuant to the jurisdiction of the court. BANA filed for foreclosure June 7, 2011, defendant was served on or about October 1, 2012. Before defendant’s files were stolen out of his house, he had appellate case law ruling that three months; four months; eight months and fourteen months were to late for service. The appellate courts dismissed the suits with prejudice.
• Rule 61: Canon 1. A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary
A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary.
An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing, and should personally observe, high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved. The provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that objective.
• Rule 62: Canon 2. A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All of the Judge’s Activities.
A. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself or herself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
• Rule 63: Canon 3. A Should Perform the Duties of Judicial Office Impartially and Diligently
The judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all the judge’s other activities. The judge’s judicial duties include all the duties of the judge’s office prescribed by law. In the performance of these duties, the following standards apply:
A. Adjudicative Responsibilities.
(3) A judge should be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity, and should require similar conduct of lawyers, and of staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge’s direction and control.
(4) A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person’s lawyer, the right to be heard according to law. A judge may make reasonable efforts, consistent with the law and court rules, to facilitate the ability of self-represented litigants to be fairly heard.
• Defendant asserts that a passive observer would be inclined to believe that Judge Fish displayed unconscionable behavior toward me during the May 28, 2014, and could well have been intoxicated due to his aforementioned behavior. Defendant asserts that he was humiliated and embarrassed by Judge Fish’s behavior.
• Defendant asserts that he was pursuing a Pro se lawsuit, case No. 2008MR9 with Judge Jacquelyn D. Ackert as the presiding judge. Judge Ackert was biased and prejudice during the 12/03/2008 hearing by calling defendant’s attorney by his first name, “Fred” and by having an armed deputy sit close to me (within two seats) during the hearing. The armed deputy would follow me all around the courthouse, even into the men’s rest room. Defendant asserts that no armed deputy was seen sitting close to “Fred”, or following him around the courthouse. Therefore, defendant has complied with 735 ILCS 5/201001(a)(3)(iii) and named Judge Ackert in my petition. In the alternative, defendant will move to substitute Judge Ackert pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-1001(c) before she makes any substantive rulings.
• Defendant asserts he cannot get a fair and impartial hearing from Judge Fish, or Judge Ackert.
• Defendant brings this petition in accord with In re Marriage of O’Brien, 2011 IL. 109039 and Chief Justice Kilbride’s special concurrence.
WHEREFORE, Defendant prays this Honorable Court will grant the above styled petition in the interest of substantial justice.
RELIEF SOUHT: Substitute the aforementioned judges with a fair and impartial judge.
Void all orders submitted by Judge Fis

[…] Help me (Shelton) now by showing up to court hearings (NEXT one 2/17/16 room 506 10 AM 2600 S California – though judge hears others first and waits until gallery empty so there will be no witnesses to her illegal rulings), giving Shelton support in pending case: click here […]

Hi Dr. Shelton, I have had more experience that I ever wanted dealing with corrupt judges. There is one issue I believe we both share; we are disabled. I was declared disabled on 02/01/2013 by a ALJ through a hearing on April 6, 2015. In my highly illegal foreclosure in Dixon, IL, Judge Fish was extremely prejudicial toward me after my lawyer, Al Henry Williams was disbarred. A paralegal with the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission informed me that there were voluminous complaints filed against him, he would never practice law again. Two complaints involved stealing money from elderly folks, but most were from his representation of foreclosure clients, or lack thereof. He was helping all the Banksters steal his clients homes. The Banksters were ignoring Service of Process laws to the point they were informing us they were not foreclosing, but were offering a home mod. I discovered Bank of America had filed for foreclosure June 7, 2011 after making my first home mod payment, at judici.com in September of 2011!!!! BoA rep. Nikia Hernandez told me BoA had not filed for foreclosure on August 28, 2011.
It is obvious that employees of Cook County have discriminated against you because of your disability of which would strip them of any immunity from a lawsuit. I can send you case law if you need them.
I hope to make it at your hearing. You will need a “Bystander’s Report” on appeal. I know judges are intimidated by bystanders taking notes during hearings. My daughter did this for me, but she is now a surgical resident in California. The judges knew her well for all her honors in high school, college and medical school. I will be in touch.

Thank u so much for answering so quickly!! I keep getting different stories from people, including people from statesville. I asked the same question I asked u and she replied “he doesn’t get any visits here amd he more than likely will be switched to another prison in less than 61 days” which didn’t answer my question. She then transferred me to “his counselor” which never answered or responded to my voicemail. Thank u very much for your help. It amazes me how often the guards and officials break the laws in prison!! My fiancee is highly allergic to poultry and fish, even sent in a letter notarized from his docter stating that fact, and instead of giving him a veggie tray they would skip meals for him amd lie and say they did feed him. So much goes on in there that they get away with. Aren’t they the ones who are there to make sure the prisoners don’t break anymore laws? But in fact they mistreat and abuse them.

Hi!! My fiancee just got shipped to statevilles. He got served 58 months but already did 2 and half years in county. His lawyer said he would do a dress in a ND out so he should be home soon. Can u please tell me when I should expect him home? Does he have to do a mandatory 61 days in stateville? All his time is creditied.

Ms Linda or anyone that can help, please help with some advice, my boyfriend was put in cook county jail last Tuesday and he has a court date this coming Thursday the 20 th of August. His bond is set at over 35k and none of us have money not even for the 10% with his from my understanding doesn’t work with child support . He always paid child support when he worked however he had a hard time finding a job and holding a job for the past 3 years. What should we expect from court Thursday as we have zero money and I had to loan money to actually survive. Also the house we or I now since he’s in jail live in is foreclosed and we have to evict so we were trying to move out of state with some of my family in Arizona.

I can’t answer a question I don’t understand. What is he charged with? What is his criminal history? What does child support have to do with his alleged crime? What does the eviction have to do with his crime?

Hi Dr. Shelton, My daughter is well known by the dirty judges in the circuit where I was convicted. I would take her to all my post judgment hearings. Especially when I was fighting these evil judges for cause. She is incredibly intelligent and they know it. They learned quickly to behave while she was present as she provided affidavits to the judge’s behavior during the hearings. She is now a surgical resident in California. I had to bribe a judge to get custody of her in 1995. Well, actually my Mother went along with it as I refused. The judge’s wife, as I would later learn, is a lesbian pedophile that thought she could get my daughter after we obtained custody. After the custody proceedings were over, my daughter confessed to me that the judge’s wife would always try to put the make on her during “shopping” trips. My daughter wisely waited until after the custody to tell me as she knew I would be outraged. I am so sorry I could not be there for you. Please keep me updated on all your court proceedings. I am presently going for executive clemency based on actual innocence as I have been repeatedly denied access to the court by dirty judges. Take care, Rick

(720 ILCS 5/21-1.01) (was 720 ILCS 5/21-4)
Sec. 21-1.01. Criminal Damage to Government Supported Property.
(a) A person commits criminal damage to government supported property when he or she knowingly:
(1) damages any government supported property without the consent of the State;
(2) by means of fire or explosive damages government supported property;
(3) starts a fire on government supported property without the consent of the State; or
(4) deposits on government supported land or in a government supported building, without the consent of the State, any stink bomb or any offensive smelling compound and thereby intends to interfere with the use by another of the land or building.
(b) For the purposes of this Section, “government supported” means any property supported in whole or in part with State funds, funds of a unit of local government or school district, or federal funds administered or granted through State agencies.
(c) Sentence. A violation of this Section is a Class 4 felony when the damage to property is $500 or less; a Class 3 felony when the damage to property exceeds $500 but does not exceed $10,000; a Class 2 felony when the damage to property exceeds $10,000 but does not exceed $100,000; and a Class 1 felony when the damage to property exceeds $100,000. When the damage to property exceeds $10,000, the court shall impose upon the offender a fine equal to the value of the damages to the property.
(Source: P.A. 97-1108, eff. 1-1-13.)

Dear Dr. Shelton, I pray you are doing well. I have been looking forward to meeting you. The long and horrendous fight against the most evil organization in this country, the “Judicial System”, takes its tole on us. I have tried to bring to this to the attention of everyone I can, but in their opinion, if it does not happen to them it is not their problem. I hope someday that there will be enough people dragged into the evil web of our corrupt judicial system to form the majority instead of the minority that will rebel against this corrupt machine. Where there are lawyers, there is darkness, greed and corruption with smiling faces bent on betrayal. May the Lord bless you, Rick Beckham

Dear Dr. Shelton, I will be with you come Hell or high water. I have tried for 20 years to get media attention to my case, but no one will publish a word. Not even CLR when their website was running. CLR would ask me for case law from time to time, but would not publish on their website any of my legal briefs for fear of being sued. My response: You can’t sue the truth. I am currently fighting a nasty foreclosure case in Lee County. I was not in default of my home loan, that is, not intentionally. I had to file for bankruptcy protection to keep the corrupt judges from allowing first Bank of America, now Greet Tree Servicing, LLC from stealing my home, therefore, aiding and abetting criminals. State and federal law mean nothing to these judges, for they believe they have been granted absolute immunity from suit. Only if they knowingly deny ones constitutional rights are they immune. I will make every effort to be at your hearing. We all must be in constant prayer, then my the Lord bless us.