Talk:pocketmonsters

Removed non-encyclopedic phrases. If we're going to even bother mentioning the staff, we'll need to include their s/n's, otherwise we shouldn't bother with that section. --Archaic 10:59, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I have their names. But technically, they're not staff per se, just ops, and almost everyone (human) has an op. Anarchist Pokémon channel, I called it. I don't really think we should have an article on this, because it has limited relevance. - 振霖T 11:40, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree. If they had some huge impact on the fandom overall, or at the very least were involved in some famous split from #f_p or similar, an article of some length might be suitable, but as it stands here, it looks more a vanity article than anything else.

I think that this name is misleading. Can we put a disambig and redirect to Pokémon? -Greengiant 19:40, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Have we got any sort of system for voting for page deletion yet? Like Wikipedia has. Because I, and it looks like a couple of you don't believe this has a place on Bulbapedia. - Ferret 18:05, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Or can we at least dust it off?

This is really kinda old, isn't it? I think this is in serious need of an update. And perhaps a move to pocketmonsters.net, as many of us know it as. --Pie~♪♫ 02:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)