No-one likes general adverts, and ours hadn't been updated for ages, so we're having a clear-out and a change round to make the new ones useful to you. These new adverts bring in a small amount to help pay for the board and keep it free for you to use, so please do use them whenever you can, Let our links help you find great books on glass or a new piece for your collection. Thank you for supporting the Board.

They were bought together, but I'm not so sure that they belong together. The bowl doesn't look right on the plinth, although it has a stepped base and seems to fit - something about the proportions IMHO that doesn't quite feel right. There are no markings on the plinth and I don't recognise it.http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y195/glassie/bowlplinth005.jpg

I checked Glen's Sowerby's Vol.2 but it wasn't there. Also, Pamela's museum, without success. Did a search on Baguley and couldn't find anything similar. I thought may be it could be Czech, but Baguley is a possibility if as you say you think the plinth could be Baguley.

The plinth is 3Â¾" high and the top is 4" diameter. It looks a bit like a plinth I had once that I was informed held a "Berlin" bowl, but the inside is more stepped and not rounded. Looking at the shape of the bottom of the bowl and the inside shape of the plinth, I'm certain that it is a mismatch.

Anthony Tiger first: happy hunting!Anne E.B: my first thought on your bowl is Scandi can only tell what it is not:German (there is a similarity to Walther 'Kopenhagen' pattern, but I do believe it is not.

Hmmm, the one in the Bagley book measures 4 inches across the top, over 5.5 inches across the base and 4 inches tall. If it wasn't for the step on the inside top rim I would have said it was the same one.