Archive for September, 2016

How should you live your life? What should you believe and why should you believe it? What values should you cherish and why should you cherish them? Is there a God, to give life meaning, or is it all just random and therefore ultimately all meaningless and purposeless and valueless?

Do you ever think about that? You know, for longer than the commercial break at some point during your favorite television program?

So many people just never bother.

It’s kind of interesting, the question-the-Bible thing: there comes a point where someone OUGHT to have questions: giving your life to Someone Else is not an easy proposition. Even Jesus told us we need to count the cost. But there comes that point when you ask your questions and you have an open heart to an ANSWER and you have your greatest questions ANSWERED. And you decide to take your stand on what you believe, what you have come to believe is true based on your own investigation.

That’s exactly what I did. I was raised in a Christian home, but when I was in the Army, my faith was eroded by the life I was living and then it was ultimately mangled. I got out of the Army spiritually broken. And I lived my life like a pagan for YEARS.

But the backslidden Christian is the most miserable person on the face of the earth, because on the one hand you can’t enjoy sin (because you’ve got the Holy Spirit in you constantly comparing your thoughts, words and actions to the Truth as you keep hearing a voice that says, “This is the way, walk in it“); and at the same time you aren’t living a pure, righteous life that honors God and cannot enjoy any of the benefits of the Christian life. And so you are “double-minded, unstable in all your ways” (James 1:8); you are wavering between two opinions (1 Kings 18:21) – and you need to make up your mind and decide who or what you will follow.

I came to realize that the person who follows himself and his own path and his own way is a selfish, self-centered narcissist: let’s talk about me for a while. And let’s KEEP talking about me; in fact let’s ALWAYS talk about me and NOTHING BUT me, because that is ultimately all that is important in this universe. Is that seriously all there is to life? Is there nothing more? Is there nothing beyond me that is more important than me that ought to shape who I am and who and what I become? And I came to a point where I needed to live for something beyond me, something greater than me. Something I could marvel at.

Another thing that came to me was a simple question: if there is no God, if the evolution that I always hear about is true, then what is right and wrong, and who decides? Another way to put it is, “How can you be a bad atheist?” Now, the ONLY way you can be a “bad atheist” is to believe in God; there ARE no moral requirements to being an atheist and no possibility for any moral requirement. You are nothing but the product of your DNA and your experiences that were outside of your control; more, you think whatever the hell you think merely because the atoms in your brain randomly happened to arrange themselves however the hell they arranged themselves.

I want you to understand very clearly where I am going here: I am making the point that when you consider the Bible, or Christianity, or religion, you are NOT doing so in a vacuum. No, you are considering one alternative from the rest of the alternatives. And so if religion is wrong, then embrace the alternative and embrace its consequences. And understand what those consequences are.

There IS no “right” or “wrong.” Not if Darwinian evolution has any credibility. And it turns out the consequences of that alternative truly matters.

Now, SOMEBODY – you know, like Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama or somebody like that – manufactured some rules for the entire herd to follow. And the herd has to follow these rules. And if you don’t follow the rules of the herd, you don’t get to be in the herd. Or at least the herd frowns on you and says you aren’t a very good herd member. But there are HERD animals and there are PREDATOR animals that HUNT and KILL and EAT the herd animals and do so without any shame or regret or guilt whatsoever. And you can alter or edit or change this morality willy-nilly, it turns out – such as when Obama was opposed to gay marriage but then was suddenly for what he’d been against – his contortions are actually even worse than that – but now it is incumbent upon all humanity to get in line with Obama or else be deemed “intolerant” and “bigoted” and “hateful.”

Because whatever is deemed “politically correct” is whatever the hell somebody else says it is until it isn’t that any more.

Now, I reject Obama and his bullcrap-bogus-pseudo morality and I reject political correctness and there had BETTER be some better reason why I ought to be “moral” – whatever the hell “morality” even is – or else in the words of that song, “Let the bodies hit the floor…”

And let it be YOUR body, or the body of your wife or your kid. Because nobody and nothing matters. This whole universe is nothing more than something that accidentally exploded into existence and will ultimately be swallowed up by the same meaningless process of nihilism that spat it out in the first place.

Me personally, I’ve always most identified with the predatory animals. Ask me what all my favorite animals are and you won’t hear me telling you, “Well, I like sheep and cows…” Nope. I favor the wolves and the lions that chase down and kill and eat their fill and are content and happy with a lifestyle that really kills the buzz of those helpless herd animals.

So start running, herd animals. Because we’re hot on your heels and we mean to chase you down and drag you down and end you and your morally idiotic evolution only justifies our doing it to you.

Rape. Burn. Slaughter. Loot. It matters not. For the madman who rips out your still beating heart with his bare fingernails is no morally different than the firemen who went up the stairs to their deaths during the hell of 9/11 when everybody else was fleeing as fast as they could.

I recall the line from the movie Alien:

Ash: You still don’t understand what you’re dealing with, do you? Perfect organism. Its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility.

Lambert: You admire it.

Ash: I admire its purity. A survivor… unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality.

Why not be that way? Be pure, be a survivor, unclouded by bogus conscience, remorse, delusions of morality that have nothing to do with the real essence of human existence if evolution has any validity whatsoever.

Dylan Klebold, one of the infamous Columbine killers, wrote in his journal that he and his accomplice Eric Harris were “god-like” and more highly evolved than every other human being. I remember hearing one of their quotes: “We are no longer human, for we have evolved beyond human morality.”

They wrote in their journals (and pardon the language but it is theirs and not mine): “Why give a fuck what Jesus would do?” And, “I blew off his head with one shot. I am god. He died.”

And why, indeed? I mean, other than the fact that WWJD is a much better acronym than WGAFWJWD.

And I demand the evolutionist give me a detailed scientific answer based on a chemical analysis of our damn brain cells that definitively proves that we should not all go thou and do likewise.

Show me how the sociopath is NOT the most evolved life form.

And evolution is a farce, or you prove they HADN’T evolved beyond human morality. Because evolution teaches me why I should murder and rape and steal to get whatever I want; and it does NOT teach me why I should love or cherish or give my what is mine for the good of someone who doesn’t even share my DNA.

I could on that simple evolutionary level be very content being a serial killer, a serial rapist, tracking down, stalking and HUNTING my human prey and satiating my own lusts, my own desires, doing my own thing my own way. If I want something, I ought to steal it. I have a lust for someone, I ought to kidnap and rape. If I don’t like somebody, I ought to hunt down and kill that somebody.

I can show you scholarly articles from evolutionists talking about rape as a simple adaptation to the requirements of natural selection and the survival of the fittest. Because evolution is all about spreading your DNA to the next generation – THAT’S WHAT MAKES YOU “THE FITTEST” BABY – and evolution doesn’t have any stipulations on how to do that. If it works, do it.

Last night I discovered and called in a bunch of stolen copper wire that somebody had stripped and sold. Why not?

At some point, I realized that if evolution were actually true, if there is no God who holds me accountable for my works, then anything is equally permissible. Not only is the torture-rapist-murderer no morally different from the Mother Teresa, but in fact the former is actually SUPERIOR to the latter; because the torture-rapist-murderer GOT IT and grasped the essence and the sheer absurdity of human existence and Mother Teresa was a stupid fool who made the wrong bet stupidly thinking there was some God at the end of the picture when there wasn’t. And now both people get the same dirt nap, only one of them lived their lives realizing all along that they would get that same dirt nap and lived their life consistently by that plan in a completely self-centered manner.

The sociopath is the true moral hero of Darwinism. Go thou and do likewise.

Jesus actually taught Christians to put away their swords, to turn the other cheek, to live in peace. Because His Way was the anathema of the Way of evolution and natural selection and survival of the fittest.

And so, confronted with a very stark choice, something in me with every fiber of my being said NO this crap that I’ve been force-fed is NOT the TRUTH. There IS a way that we should live, a right way and a WRONG way. And each must have CONSEQUENCES. And if that ISN’T so, then don’t you DARE look down and judge the torture-murder-rapist who enjoys his “work” with that screaming woman or that terrorized little child. Because he is only doing what is in him to do. If it feels good, do it, right? Just like the homosexuals and the abortionists and the dope users say to justify their “choices” that fly in the face of everything every culture before them previously ever believed. There is no more wrong with what they do than what the heyena does when they chase an exhausted animal down and start literally eating it alive. And who the hell are YOU who DON’T have that person’s DNA and DIDN’T live his life and have his however-twisted experiences to judge that person???

Because either God created me in His divine image or I am no different from all the other animals that are the same mindless product of the exact same mindless evolution. Human beings are either the one or they are the other. Period.

Now, I want you to realize that this wasn’t just an intellectual game for me: I got out of the Army a trained killer, a highly trained expert stalker of human beings, a soldier thoroughly trained to deploy weapons specifically engineered to exterminate human beings like bugs – and more than a little bit bitter besides – and I was at that point where I could have gone either way. And why NOT go to the dark side unless there was a genuine, profound difference between the two sides???

Unless there is a God who truly stands above ALL of us as our Creator and has the RIGHT to make the rules for ALL of us and hold ALL of us accountable to His rules that emerge from HIS character and nature and purpose for creating us in the first place. And I was accountable to that Creator and no eternal dirt nap: the choice is either everlasting heavenly reward or everlasting hellish suffering. And you get to choose which.

I mean, just so you know, I was trained by my own government how to kill my fellow genus homo and species sapiens with my bare hands, with a knife, with the bayonet, with pistols, with rifles, with machine guns, with hand grenades, with grenade launchers, with mortars, with rocket launchers, with the M47 Dragon, and even with the M220 Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided missle system. Not that I have most of those things now. And I was trained how to parachute out of a perfectly good airplane so I could – on command – kill my fellow human beings like bugs within 18 hours notice anywhere on planet earth. The question whether I would kill other human beings wasn’t an “academic” one; if and when I was activated, I would accomplish my mission that I was trained and indoctrinated to accomplish. And by “indoctrinated,” I mean mentally and morally conditioned to sight in on an enemy and gently squeeze the trigger. So I can state categorically that I was a trained killer; the lion and the wolf have nothing on me.

You have likely heard that slogan, “There are no atheists in foxholes.” I’m sure that’s not an absolute statement, but it does underscore a very valid point: soldiers are people who for the most part need to believe in absolutes and objective values and transcendence in order to function. And that’s because, for example, we have to deal with the reality that there is indeed an “absolute” difference between being alive and being a screaming, dismembered, disemboweled pile of bloody, quivering guts. We believe in objective values because we need to believe that we’re living and dying for some kind of ultimately meaningful purpose; we need to know our sacrifice ultimately means something. And we tend to believe in transcendence because we are people who may have to go through that moment of knowledge that in a very short time we are going to be in a battle and we may not live through it and we want to be in heaven. And those three reasons are why there aren’t very many atheists in foxholes.

And so it was on that background that I began my investigation as to whether or not I should believe in God and what God I should believe in if there IS a God. And also consider the consequences if there is NOT a God.

I mean, how ought a US-government trained super-predator live?

Now, the people who lived half-ass lives, who are afraid one the one hand to be what the Obama’s and the Clinton’s who make up all the politically correct rules for society call “intolerant” or whatever, but who at the same time don’t with any passion follow God or His ways, I GOT NO TIME FOR THEM.

Maybe that disgust at those who won’t get off the fence comes from my experience serving on a team where it was “us” and “them” – and “they” were trying to kill “us” and if “us” had any desire to live whatsoever we better kill “them” first. That’s certainly one very good way to get at the essence of how black-and-white reality truly is.

Get on one side or get on the other side, choose this day whom you will serve (Joshua 24:15). The person sitting on the middle of the teeter totter of life is totally useless. And the people who just can’t sit themselves on the ends just muck up the whole operation of the teeter totter of life.

And that’s exactly the way God designed the world: there is heaven on the one side and there is hell on the other. There isn’t any “middle place” where the useless people who never had the balls to make up their damn useless minds go.

Jesus says that there are the sheep (the righteous) and there are the goats (the wicked). He says He will divide them into two and ONLY two groups, and He will say to one, “Enter into the joy of your Master,” while to the other He will say, “Depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness. I never knew you.”

Jesus says in the Book of Revelation, “I know all the things you do, that you are neither hot nor cold. I wish that you were one or the other! But since you are like lukewarm water, neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth! You say, ‘I am rich. I have everything I want. I don’t need a thing!’ And you don’t realize that you are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked.” — Revelation 3:15-17.

And yes. That’s the way it works in God’s universe. And to quote J. Vernon McGee, “you might have a better plan than God, but what you DON’T have is your own universe.”

God wants PASSION in His pursuers. He frankly wants us to follow Him with all our heart and all our soul and all our strength and all our mind (Luke 10:27) or else hey, please don’t bother.

And so it was with that big picture – one way or the other, the light side or the dark side – that I began to investigate whether there is a God and which God I should follow if there is.

I actually gave the Darwinists their first shot. I mean, if they could prove their case, then why bother looking at useless religions that talked about fairy-tale gods???

And so I read the hot-off-the-press at-that-time atheist work, “The Blind Watchmaker,” from cover to cover.

Right off the bat, I came across this memorable quote from Dawkins:

Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose. — The Blind Watchmaker (1996) p.1

And Dawkins also said in The Blind Watchmaker:

“Animals give the appearance of having been designed by a theoretically sophisticated and practically ingenious physicist or engineer…” — (p. 36)

Okay, so I’m hearing the man CONCEDE the major point that HIS SIDE has the BURDEN OF PROOF because he concedes that prima facie – on its face to be accepted as correct until proven otherwise – admission that it DOES in FACT appear self-evident that things were DESIGNED by a creator with a purpose. Just as St. Paul confirmed to believers in Romans chapter one.

And I have two arms with opposable thumbs so that I can open the stupid fridge with my right hand and take out the gallon of milk or the six pack of beer with my left hand. Design and purpose, kids. As in design WITH a purpose.

So Dawkins told us from the outset that the burden of proof was on his side to PROVE beyond any shadow of a doubt whatsoever that there is no Creator God and can be no Creator God. But as I read, do you know what I increasingly began to observe? That this man was an appalling moral idiot, and that what truly set him apart was the gargantuan arrogance of a genuine fool.

If the prima facie case rests with design and therefore Creation, then the sensible person believes that unless and until the alternative is PROVEN otherwise. And he proceeded to FAIL spectacularly by any standard outside of his own incredibly narrow-minded presupposed viewpoint that he holds a priori based on his narrow-minded speculations rather than any legitimate science.

Then I read a book that I got from the library called “Darwin’s Enigma” from a man named Luther Sunderland. And what intrigued me about that book was that it was written by a guy who had literally been hired by the state of New York for the purpose of ascertaining whether creationism was an acceptable teaching for public schools. And he talked to the leading evolutionists in the world as he compiled his research from that secular purpose. Some of the curators from the leading museums of natural history on planet earth were literally quoted as saying that evolution was NOT a legitimate scientific theory and should NOT be taught as a fact in the public schools.

So I believe as I ought to believe when I intellectually believe there is a God who intelligently designed us with a plan for His creation. And I believe what I ought to believe when I morally believe that there is a God who holds us accountable for how we live and how we act.

And then from that I began to study the world religions. I examined each one until it disqualified itself. But at the same time I had already determined that ONE of them must be the real McCoy.

I considered Buddhism and Hinduism. I considered Islam. The first two disqualified themselves on the intellectual level because who the heck instituted “reincarnation”??? Who built that thing? Who designed that system? And who made the rest of us that go through these endless cycles of reincarnation? And who was the Big Banger who made it all happen? They also failed on numerous moral grounds. You look at India and see the caste system and you know what I’m talking about; you see the millions of gods and the fact that evil and good are basically viewed as being two sides of the same coin and you see what I’m talking about.

It isn’t rocket science, kiddies. God is either personal or impersonal: if He is personal, then Buddhism and Hinduism are false; if He is impersonal, then Christianity and Judaism and Islam are false.

Buddhism strictly denies the existence of human beings as “selves.” This doctrine is literally one of the three marks of existence of Buddhism: Anattā (no-self, without soul, no essence) is the nature of living beings. The other two are Anicca (impermanence, nothing lasts) and Dukkha (suffering, unsatisfactoriness is innate in birth, aging, death, rebirth, redeath – the Saṃsāra cycle of existence). And scientific naturalism likewise denies the existence of the self, of the soul, of a “you” that is a permanent you, for what it’s worth. According to these views, there IS no “you” inside you; there IS no free will; you are a strictly determined and strictly conditioned being with no soul.

Islam is mono-theistic, which is good. But from there it gets very, very bad very, very quickly. And the fact that today 99.99 percent of terrorist attackers are being committed by the most ardent followers of what Muhammad actually taught is kind of icing on that cake. If you understand the dilemma of violence inherent within Islam – which is NOT shared by Christianity – it is frankly terrifying. Islam specifically denies that God has a Son, so if Jesus is who the Bible declares He is, Islam is false. And if Jesus is NOT who the Bible declares Him to be, then Christianity is false.

Each of the great religions of the world teach mutually exclusive truth claims: they can’t all be true or right. You are a fool according to the rules of logic and reason to believe “all paths lead to the same God.” Because no, they don’t.

There are literally thousands and thousands of teachers and professors with PhDs who are literally presenting their students with intellectual gibberish when they teach the pluralistic universalism that is so common today.

Now, I want you to understand; I’m not micro-nitpicking at this point on ANY of my above investigations. I’m just trying to ascertain whether or not the BIG PICTURE is true. If the big picture is false, then all the tiny little details are false, too. Or, to put it another way: if the big picture is fake, who gives a damn about whether the inconsequential details are true or not?

So when I get to Christianity, it all ends up boiling down to one simple question: did Jesus rise bodily from the dead, as His disciples claimed? What’s the evidence for that central claim of Christianity? And if that big picture claim is false, then I frankly don’t give a flying damn about the Bible. But if it’s true…?

I dedicated myself to a study of the evidence about the Resurrection of Jesus from the dead. And if you examine that claim with a halfway open mind, the evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus from the dead is simply astounding and irrefutable. The bottom line comes down to this: there is simply no reasonable question that Jesus’ disciples believed with ever fiber of their being that they had seen Jesus alive after His crucifixion and death and burial. There isn’t a single New Testament scholar – Christian or secularist alike – who claims the disciples didn’t genuine believe they had seen Jesus alive. Their completely transformed lives and boldness in the face of certain persecution and even death confirms that fact. And in fact it is a historical fact that every single one of the apostles save St. John died as martyrs having traveled the known world to tell people about the Jesus they had personally seen alive after His death in confirmation of all of His claims of His deity and His purpose for coming into the world: to die for our sins and to rise again and take His sheep with Him to the Father in Heaven.

Find me one person who you know to have died for something that they knew for a fact to be false. Yes, we have a lot of Muslim “martyrs” who blow themselves up to kill “infidels” and we probably both agree these people are tragically wrong: but THEY believe what they’re doing is right and THEY believe in Allah. But you need to understand as you read the Gospel accounts: the disciples were in a unique position in human history: they were in the position to absolutely know for certain whether or not Jesus actually rose from the dead.

And every single one of them signed in their own blood their testimony that yes, they had witnessed it with their own eyes and they were willing to therefore lay down their own lives to carry their OWN crosses (literally the instruments of their death penalties) and die for their Lord who had already died for them and given their lives and their deaths meaning.

If Jesus died and rose again from the dead, Christianity is true and everything Jesus said is true and the Christianity that He founded is true and the Bible is true and that’s that. And He did and He did and He WAS true and Christianity IS true and the Bible that He affirmed is true and that’s that.

And to a man like me, that is all I need to tell me what I should live for and how I ought to live.

That’s the big picture. But there is so much confirmation in the little tidbits, too.

Just – and I mean JUST – watched a program called “The Fall of Jericho” on the military history channel I love to watch. And I watched a drama that has been played out over and over again about the accuracy and legitimacy of the Holy Bible. I couldn’t find the transcript of the program, but here’s a link that describes in even more detail what was presented.

So Jericho. Did it happen according to what the Bible claims in the Book of Joshua? Well, you wouldn’t believe how many times “scientists” said hell no. And they said it with no legitimate archaeological basis. An archaeologist named Garstang made it his life’s work to go through the layers of cities that Jericho had been built and rebuilt on in the 1930s. And he found something fascinating in one of those layers: the walls had collapsed in EXACTLY the pattern that the Bible described in the conquest of Jericho. Well, we know that Joshua and the Israelites entered the land in the late Bronze age. In fact we know by other data the actual time of 1406 BC. So Garstang was interested in WHEN the walls had collapsed. And he started collecting and dating pottery. And according to his analysis, the date of the site was 1406BC – EXACTLY WHEN THE BIBLE SAID. So the Bible was established FACT and to the level of amazing scientific verifiability.

But hold on. A different archaeologist showed up named Kathleen Kenyon and “found” that no, the walls of Jericho had been destroyed 150 years earlier. And she used the same pottery as her primary source of dating.

Thirty years pass. For thirty years all the “scholars” and all the “scientists” sneered at the Bible. It had been factually refuted.

But a guy named Dr. Bryant Woods shows up in the 1980s. And he’s doing his PhD on pottery and decides to reopen the case that had been “rock-solid” against the Bible. He decided he was going to evaluate ALL the evidence of the pottery fragments. He tracked them all down. And to his intellectual horror he discovered that this pseudo-scientific fraud Kathleen Kenyon had not even BOTHERED to look at most of the actual evidence before arriving at her sneering bogus conclusion. Seriously, Woods went to the museums and found that Kenyon hadn’t even examined the evidence.

And Dr. Bryant Woods CONCLUSIVELY PROVED THAT THE BIBLE WAS COMPLETELY HISTORICALLY ACCURATE IN EVERY SINGLE DETAIL THAT IT HAD AFFIRMED.

And this sneering arrogant intellectually dishonest fools’ game has been played over and over and over again with the Bible.

But the fact remains that NO archaeological find has EVER controverted a SINGLE fact presented in the Bible. It stands as completely true in all that it affirms.

The Bible remains true as the anvil of history. You can pound on it as you will, but you will die and the Word of the Living God will go on and on and on.

The Bible is beyond any doubt the best seller in the entire history of planet earth: more copies are sold every year, more are sold every single month, every single week, every single DAY, than any other book in the world. Twenty million copies of the Bible are sold each year just in the United States alone. And that doesn’t even count the millions of copies that are given away by people who have their OWN stories of their OWN encounters with a Jesus who is STILL alive. As an example, the Gideons alone distributes about 60 million copies of the Bible a year.

The Harry Potter series has collectively sold 500 million copies worldwide, which is truly astounding. Unless you compare it to the more than six BILLION copies of the Bible.

The Bible is available in over 2,100 languages. Because humanity has a passion and a hunger for the true Word of the Living God.

Richard Dawkins’ book, for the official record, is not; in fact it’s none of the above at all.

So I read the Bible with that understanding that it is THE most sacred Book in the history of the world. It ought to be given that respect because what I just stated is simply true by any objective measure. But the scoffers continue to abound and they have no respect for anything that is sacred.

But it comes down to this: people who fixate on the most minor details and then say, “See? It’s wrong, it’s ALL wrong!!!” are not wise.

Most of the time, when I hear somebody assert to me that the Bible isn’t accurate or isn’t reliable, and I ask them to give me an example, they literally cannot think of even ONE such example. Somebody at some time said something, and that was all they needed and they never bothered on their own to verify or refute a claim they just took at face value.

I simply marvel at that: your entire ETERNITY hangs on this, and you just yawn and walk away like it’s no big deal when it is the biggest deal of your existence.

My challenge to everyone is to study the questions of eternity as though your soul depends on it: because it DOES.

DON’T be a “Kathleen Kenyon” who doesn’t bother with the facts and arrives at bogus conclusions that are based on lies; be a “Bryant Wood” who carefully examines all the evidence and arrives at the truth. Be like St. Luke the author of the Gospels and Acts, who stated, “I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning” (Luke 1:3). Be like the Bereans, who “were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so” (Acts 17:11).

Consider Jesus. Consider Who He was and whether He Is.

One way or another, you have to answer the ultimate questions. Is there a God? Who is He? What does He expect of us? Or is there NO god? And if not why should I bother living in accordance with a bunch of made-up politically correct gibberish and if I want something that someone else has, why shouldn’t I steal it and if somebody’s bothering me why shouldn’t I kill him or her? And who the hell does any other human being think he or she is to tell me what I should do or how I should live when it’s MY life and it will be MY eternal dirt nap and butt the hell out of my business because I’m not a herd animal, I’m a predator animal. And your own precious evolution says we predators are every bit as evolutionarily valid as your herd animals.

Or chose Christ and choose life and experience life more abundantly instead. Because Jesus contrasted the Way of Evolution with His Way when He said:

“The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.” — John 10:10

Stop being double-minded, unstable in all your ways. Stop wavering between two opinions. Make up your mind. Get off the fence. Choose this day whom you will serve.

Frankly, the very idea of “debates” is actually kind of silly. We’ve been doing it for well over a century and all, but what’s really the point? You remember when the President of the United States debated Vladimir Putin? Oh, wait. Me neither. Because it’s never happened.

It would be a better demonstration of presidential fitness to put a knife in the hand of each party’s candidate and push them in a room together and lock the door. And don’t open it until one of them comes out alive and the other one is a gashed pile of bloody meat on the floor. I mean, at least we’ve got to see that kind of drama played out by Harrison Ford in “Air Force One.”

I’m just saying I don’t know what “winning” a debate really means, other than the pinky-in-the-air class getting to snort at the candidate that doesn’t suit their ideology very well.

Everybody is saying Hillary won the debate. And like I said, I don’t blame them.

But maybe Donald Trump lost the debate but won the argument.

Take a look at one of the polls that came out after the debate (and which coming from the LA Times is NOT fond of Donald Trump):

After millions of Americans watched Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton debate on Monday night, a new poll shows support for Trump is increasing.

The USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times Daybreak tracking poll, which tracks Americans’ support for the presidential candidates on a daily basis, showed that as of Tuesday, Trump is leading Clinton 46.7 percent to 42.6 percent.

The poll, which unlike other polls tracks the same population over time, represents a significant comeback for Trump, who as of Aug. 14 was trailing Clinton 46.3 percent to 41.6 percent.

The national poll tracks the voting preferences of 3,000 participating voters, but not every voter participates every day. Participation in the wake of the debate was at 90 percent, making it one of the highest participation days since the poll began in July.

Trump has significant leads in many demographic groups.

He now leads Clinton among voters aged 18-34, 44.7 percent to 39.2 percent. Clinton had led among this group throughout the early part of the campaign.

Voters between 35-64 years old also side with Trump 45.5 percent to 43.5 percent. This group has changed preferences repeatedly. Trump also continues to lead among older voters with a 49.5 percent to 44.7 percent lead among voters 65 and over.

From the start, Trump has held a vast lead over Clinton among voters with a high school education or less, and trailed her among college graduates. Among voters with some college education, Trump posts a lead of 48.3 percent to 40 percent.

Among white voters, Trump leads 54.8 percent to 33.7 percent. Although his current 18.2 percent support among black voters is an increase from the summer, Clinton still has a strong showing among black voters with 74.3 percent. Clinton also leads among Hispanic voters, but by a narrower margin of 56.8 percent to 31.8 percent.

Clinton had led among women from the start, and currently leads Trump 50 percent to 38.8 percent. Among men, Trump leads Clinton 54.9 percent to 35.1 percent.

Voters with incomes under $35,000 have favored Clinton throughout the campaign. She leads Trump 49.5 percent to 39.2 percent among these voters. Voters with incomes from $35,000 to $75,000 favor Trump 51.1 percent to 37.6 percent. Upper income voters support Trump 47.9 percent to 43.2 percent.

A Post Debate Poll conducted after the presidential showdown at Hofstra University finds Hillary Clinton put on the best performance, but Donald Trump won votes. While voters 47% to 44% think that Mrs. Clinton “won the first presidential debate,” Mr. Trump won over undecided voters who changed their mind by nearly a 3 to 1 margin.

Nine percent (9%) were undecided on the question of who won the debate.

Among those who were undecided (5%) before the debate, 31% changed their mind and now say they’ll support the New York businessman. By comparison, only 11% of previously undecided voters said they will now vote for the former secretary of state.

The results were noteworthy, considering more voters than not thought Mrs. Clinton gave a better debate performance. Authenticity, honesty and trustworthiness played and will continue to play a big role in voters’ preferences ahead of November.

“Voters are looking for Donald Trump to basically give them permission to vote for him, fair or not,” says PPD’s senior analyst Richard Baris. “If he improves in the next two debates, which he did during the primary, things could get really ugly really fast for Hillary Clinton.”

Regarding the debate, which most mainstream pundits gave to Mrs. Clinton, most voters expected her to be polished on stage. But they were watching to see if Mr. Trump could pass the presidential bar.

“He was restrained, He came off much more natural,” said Shaun Ellis, an independent voter from Hopington, New Hampshire. “Hillary looked weak on the economy,” adding he decided “we need new blood.”

[…]

I don’t know for sure if this is all true. There is such a tendency for people to see what they want to see and view reality through the prism of their ideology.

We’ll have to see what other polls are saying.

But I DO know what I think happened if the above is correct: I believe that Hillary won the debate on the rhetorical side, but Trump successfully won the argument by pounding home the fact that this country is and has been sliding in the wrong direction and Hillary represents the status quo (i.e. further and faster slide in the wrong direction).

And as the above article points out, people are just trying to see if the “change candidate” is sane enough and stable enough to take a chance on, given that the alternative of Hillary Clinton is just so damn reprehensible.

Obama, meanwhile, continues to claim that everybody on planet earth is wrong and political and partisan save he alone because as our creator god he and he alone is all-wise.

That’s more than just a flesh wound, as they say. And that’s gonna leave a mark, as they also say.

Hey, THAT would have been a nice question from Lester Holt for Hillary: do you agree with basically everyone, or do you agree with Obama that everyone but him is political and not willing to do the right thing??? But again, no toughies for Hillary from Lester.

I know, I know: the debate society types think Hillary won and that should be all she wrote about who should be president. But the people who don’t give a damn about debates and just want a halfway-decent LEADER just don’t see it that way.

Washington (CNN)The number of individuals who were supposed to have been deported but were instead granted citizenship is far higher than was initially reported by media covering the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General’s office report on the matter.

On Monday, the Inspector General reported that 858 individuals from “special interest countries” — meaning countries that are considered to be “of concern to the national security” of the US — were supposed to have been deported but were instead granted US citizenship.

But the truth is the report is even worse than reported, with more than 1,800 individuals naturalized who should have been deported from the country.

A reason for the underplaying of the number may have been the report’s focus, which was whether the US Citizenship and Immigration Services was using digital fingerprints effectively. The Inspector General determined that the agency granted citizenship to 858 individuals who had been ordered deported or removed under another identity but “their digital fingerprint records were not available” during the naturalization process.

But a footnote on page one of the report also states that there were, as of November 2015, an additional 953 individuals about whom the Inspector General couldn’t determine if there was a problem with the fingerprint records specifically, but also should have been deported. This other group consisted of members of a slightly broader classification, from countries of concern as well as from neighboring countries where there is a history of fraud.

That amounts to a total of 1,811 individuals granted citizenship who should not have been.

Fact two tells us the REAL REASON this act of treason happened – and this proves beyond any shadow of any doubt that Barack Obama and every damn Democrat is a genuine traitor:

An internal Obama administration email shows immigration officials may be literally working overtime to swear in as many new “citizen voters” as possible before the Nov. 8 presidential election, a powerful lawmaker charged Thursday.

The email, from a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services field office chief and part of a chain of correspondence within the agency, urges the unnamed recipient to swear in as many citizens as possible “due to the election year.”

“The Field Office due to the election year needs to process as many of their N-400 cases as possible between now and FY 2016,” reads the email, which was disclosed to FoxNews.com by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., who chairs the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

“If you have cases in this category or other pending, you are encouraged to take advantage of the OT if you can,” the email continues. “This will be an opportunity to move your pending naturalization cases. If you have not volunteered for OT, please consider and let me know if you are interested.”

Parts of the email were redacted before it was disclosed to FoxNews.com, but it was sent by the branch chief of the Houston Field Office District 17. It was not clear to whom it was addressed.

Those 1,800 people who were so dangerous they were supposed to be DEPORTED being instead made citizens was NO ACCIDENT. It was part of a wicked plan from a wicked man from the party of demonic wickedness.

If you are a Democrat, you are a diseased piece of the worst kind of depraved moral filth; you are a rapist, a child molester, a murderer, a terrorist.

Or at least Obama counts on you to vote just like the above list of vermin vote.

Obama has his departments literally working OVERTIME ON TAXPAYER DOLLARS to create as many new criminal Democrats as he can.

We can already see the abject criminality and treason of this coming election.

Democrats need more wicked people in America to vote their wickedness.

And they will “fundamentally transform” as many criminals into “citizens” as they can to make that travesty of decency happen.

Good thing I keep my barf bucket handy whenever I read the news. Otherwise the carpet would be really disgusting by now.

In the same way, Democrats have been CHEATING FOR YEARS in our elections. Because anybody who tries to tell you that illegal immigrants are not voting are abject FOOLS:

In 2005, the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that up to 3 percent of the 30,000 individuals called for jury duty from voter registration rolls over a two-year period in just one U.S. district court were not U.S. citizens. While that may not seem like many, just 3 percent of registered voters would have been more than enough to provide the winning presiden­tial vote margin in Florida in 2000. Indeed, the Cen­sus Bureau estimates that there are over a million illegal aliens in Florida, and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has prosecuted more non-citizen voting cases in Florida than in any other state.

Florida is not unique. Thousands of non-citizens are registered to vote in some states, and tens if not hundreds of thousands in total may be present on the voter rolls nationwide. These numbers are significant: Local elections are often decided by only a handful of votes, and even national elections have likely been within the margin of the number of non-citizens ille­gally registered to vote.

Yet there is no reliable method to determine the number of non-citizens registered or actually voting because most laws to ensure that only citizens vote are ignored, are inadequate, or are systematically undermined by government officials. Those who ignore the implications of non-citizen registration and voting either are willfully blind to the problem or may actually favor this form of illegal voting.

Here’s another one on the opposite side of the nation that Democrats lie and cheat and steal across. And note these vile illegal immigrant traitors to our way of life are now 300 percent greater than they were (3% in 2005 versus 13% in 2015):

As we always knew, California and American elections are filled with fraud and corruption. Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers.

Could this be why real citizens don’t vote—the illegal aliens outvote them? Worse, in close elections illegal aliens can make the difference. Corruption? Look at the ballot box. In fact, they could have elected a President and Senator!

“Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.”

And I’ll bet you it’s 25% or MORE by now. Because everybody knows that Obama wants it, that Democrats want it, and that Democrats are pathologically dishonest people who have rigged the system.

On Tuesday afternoon, Toulouse Oliver requested that the County Bureau of Elections Administrator forward all of Lechuga-Tena’s voting history to the District Attorney’s office. By 5:30 p.m., an email was sent to the DA alerting the elections division of possible voter fraud.

“Bernalillo County Clerk’s Office would like to officially alert you of a suspected violation of the Election Code, which was brought to our attention today via the below email chain,” read an email from the Clerk’s office to the DA.

According to the voting records obtained through the County Clerk, Lechuga-Tena first voted in an Albuquerque election in 2003 when she was 20 and again in a 2014 Democratic primary election.

Lechuga-Tena previously told NM Political Report that she mistakenly registered to vote and later cast a vote before she was a U.S. citizen. She said the mistake was corrected when she cancelled her voter registration. The next time she voted was in 2007 after, according to Lechuga-Tena, she became a citizen.

It is frankly amazing to look at cow-eyed Democrats tell you that what I just proved is happening can ever actually happen. So let’s literally shred the 2nd Amendment every way imaginable – in California they have so limited guns with nutjob requirements and are now in the works to send the price of ammunition skyrocketing by requiring an actual background check just to buy a box of fifty .22 ammo – but let’s complete the process of a foreign takeover by allowing non-American non-citizens to literally vote us out of our own country. But here we are in black-and-white: this illegal immigrant voted illegally in a U.S. election and the records prove she did it and she even admitted she did it. Case closed. And Democrats tell you, don’t worry, it’s impossible that reality could ever actually happen. And you should just ignore the fact that reality IS happening due to political correctness and racism and whatever the hell other slander we can throw at you.

I recall reading the stories of the collapse of the Aztec and the Incan and the Mayan by the Spanish and it seemed so damn PATHETIC. I mean, how could a few guys in funny armor over pantaloons take over like that? Now I understand because the American people are more pathetic than those civilizations ever were. And we’re going to lose our country as a result. The Aztec and Inca and Maya vastly outnumbered the Spanish, but their cultures made it impossible for them to fight back; and that’s the United States under the suicide pact otherwise known as “political correctness.” We’re losing everything and we’re sitting here watching it happen and doing not one damn thing about it.

Here’s another thing: You don’t want to think of the hell Nazi Democrats would unleash on illegal immigrants if they voted Republican. Their union thugs and their Black Lies Matter thugs and their anti-Trump thugs would be beating down illegal immigrants in ways that would make the people who like to watch pit bull tear each other apart puke. You would see rabid mobs of Democrats surrounding unconscious immigrants kicking them in the face.

Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe just gave voting rights to 200,000 felons in Virginia.

McAuliffe is a lifelong best friend of the Clintons. This wasn’t subtle. There was no attempt to hide or disguise what just happened. This is clearly his gift to his close friend Hillary. The Governor of Virginia just added 200,000 low-lifes and dirt-bags to the voter rolls in Virginia to try to steal the election for his buddy Hillary.

Funny how these things work when you’re tone deaf to what this looks like to good, hard-working, law-abiding, taxpaying Americans.

Democrat Governor McAuliffe’s new law applies to any convicted felon…even violent felons…even felons from other states now living in Virginia.

It doesn’t just allow them to vote- this new law allows them to run for office, serve on a jury, or become a notary public.

Keep in mind murder VICTIMS don’t get to serve on juries, or vote, or run for office ever again, but now their murderers do.

Democrats know that the more wicked and the more evil and the more totally sold out to the devil you are, the more likely you will vote Democrat.

You laugh like the hell you are from, Democrat. But you are going to get yours. There is justice coming, or God is not the LORD. And God IS the LORD.

One day soon, Democrat, you will find yourself screaming in the searing agony of the molten fire of hell, where the worm never dies and the fire is never quenched according to the word of Jesus Himself in Mark chapter nine. You are TEN TIMES more guilty than the Nazis of exterminating innocent human beings in your abortion mills and then selling off their body parts; you stuck your middle finger at God and mocked Him as you “re-defined” marriage in your own perverted and utterly depraved image. You are not only liars and thieves, but you have made lying and theft the very heart of your national policy.

In the short run, you’re going to win, because the Antichrist is coming, and you are going to vote for him and be so very happy, and you’re going to take his mark on your right hand, or on your forehead, and you’re going to worship him. But in the long run, you’re going to stand before a Great White Throne where Christ Himself declares, “I never knew you!” And you’re going to be cast alive in a body that will never die into a lake of fire where you will scream and scream and scream.

I still remember the communist slogan that was also the Democrat Party’s union boss slogan: “Workers of the world, unite!”

Now it’s “Terrorists of the world, unite!” And Black Lives Matter has demonstrated very well that the formula “Islamic State = Black Lives Matter” is proven.

Yesterday I documented the fact that the same FBI – acronym now standing for “Fool Bureaucratic Incompetence” – that failed to indict Hillary Clinton no matter how damn beyond obvious her guilt was has failed at least FOUR times to intervene with terrorists with obvious histories of radicalism from massacring Americans in terrorist attacks.

Our entire system has been turned against itself; it is now a giant, broken reciprocating engine with every single downward stroke creating more and more and more internal damage as the metal is worn down until parts clash and gears are broken and the entire thing just implodes if not explodes.

Our society is headed for complete breakdown. With hell to surely follow. Anyone who is not a fool should see our end coming.

Not only can’t we stop Islamic radicals from attacking us EVEN WHEN OUR FBI KNOWS ALL ABOUT THEM, but we can’t even stop a criminal traitor from becoming our damn PRESIDENT!!!

America is a pig all ready for slaughter and like the pig we the people are the very last ones to realize it.

And, frankly, whether you are horrified by the prospect of Hillary Clinton or horrified by the prospect of Donald Trump, there is one and ONLY one man who is responsible for the climate of vicious and rabid anger that has permeated the very soul of this nation – and that one man is Barack Obama. He set out to BREAK the Republican Party and he has succeeded beyond the wildest nightmare in enraging half the nation while at the same time radicalizing his own party so that what was lunatic fringe Democrat just a few years ago is now “mainstream Democrat Party” ideology today. As I’ve shown elsewhere by literally predicting it –

Obama’s strategy is to set aside and flatly ignore the law for his own political benefit. Every American who is not deeply troubled by that – troubled enough to not vote for this fascist – is UN-American.

What Obama has done is provide an example of out-and-out lawlessness on the part of the president of the United States. And when we get a hard-core right wing president the way Obama has been a hard-core left wing president, Obama and the Democrat Party and all of those who voted for Obama and the Democrat Party will be entirely to blame for that president and his extremist actions. You mark my words. Because what goes around comes around, and if a Democrat can set aside the law the way Obama has now repeatedly done, well, guess who’s going to be stomping on your necks under your own president’s prior justification??? Conservatives are rising up in a spirit of righteous outrage. You have repeatedly slapped us in the face through your messiah Obama, and the time is coming when we’re going to punch you hard in the nose and then keep on punching. And when that day comes, liberals, look to yourselves for blame. — My exact words from June 18, 2012

Donald Trump is on OBAMA more than on anyone else. Obama’s chief joy in life was sticking the Republicans in the eye and then exploiting their ensuing outrage as if he was as shocked by it as the [gambling] Captain Renault was shocked to “learn” there was gambling going on at the Casablanca. Right after which he was handed his own winnings. Obama knew full damn well what he was doing, poking the beast in the snout and then acting shocked that it became angry and pointing at it and saying, “Look at this monster!” And I have the prophetic credibility that comes from explaining why three years before it happened. Donald Trump – or someone even WORSE – is the natural, inevitable result of Obama. And if Hillary Clinton succeeds, the next inevitable result will be ten times worse or he will be the Antichrist himself. Because she is an even more divisive figure than he is and her entire career has proved it.

So don’t gasp in horror that Republicans picked a Donald Trump, ye Democrats who had already crowned a criminal and in fact a traitor. Nobody BUT a criminal and a traitor installs an illegal secret server, then purges tens of thousands of emails from it, then uses Bleachbit to destroy all traces, while smashing 13 smart phones and five iPads. That is NOT the behavior of anyone who should have EVER been close to the White House, let alone president. That’s the actions of a drug cartel kingpin, or a the leader of an international child molester ring.

Two of the most loathsome things that came out of the wicked, depraved, vile soul of Barack Hussein Obama is Islamic State and Black Lives Matter.

We just saw it played out: on the same day we suffered two Islamic State-inspired terrorist attacks: one in Minnesota, where an Islamic State-inspired terrorist stabbed 9 people with a knife after screaming at them about Islam, and the other in New Jersey and New York, where an Islamic State-inspired terrorist used pressure cooker bombs against the American people.

Then it’s a matter of a couple of days later that we have Black Lives Matter-inspired riots in Charlotte, North Carolina.

And now we are finding out that these two bowel movements spawned by Obama have basically the same basic goals.

And just like Captain Renault in Casablanca, Democrats are shocked, SHOCKED!!! to learn that anyone would associate the appeals to murder police with the actual assassination of police officers in numerous attacks all over the country by the very same racist group that has been calling for it to happen to begin with.

Democrats are evil people representing an evil ideology, literally defiantly representing the devil and just as defiantly rejecting the God of the Bible. If God hates it, Democrats love it; if God loves it, Democrats hate it. It’s about as simple as that.

Ahmad Khan Rahami is accused of detonating a bomb that injured more than 30 people in New York, as well as another device targeting a military charity run in New Jersey and two others that did not explode as planned.

In a federal charge sheet filed on Tuesday, authorities revealed the existence of the journal and said it contained praise for Nidal Hasan, who massacred 13 people at Fort Hood in Texas, “brother Osama bin Laden” and Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-Yemeni al-Qaeda recruiter killed in a US drone strike in 2011.

Officials made no mention of the so-called Islamic State in the indictment, but photos of the journal have revealed direct references to the terror group’s chief propagandist and second-in-command, Abu Muhammad al-Adnani.

He was known for speeches calling on supporters to launch terror attacks around the world, which have been directly cited by several jihadists who carried out atrocities in Europe and the San Bernardino massacre in California.

Rahami’s journal appears to specifically refer to Adnani’s last announcement, released in May, which called for “soldiers of the caliphate” who could not travel to Isis territories to attack civilians “day and night” wherever, and however, they could.

The ramblings also refer to two names used by Isis for areas it controls in Iraq and Syria – “Dawla” and “Sham”.

Despite repeated allusions to the group, there was no mention of Isis in a charge sheet released by prosecutors earlier this week. The reason for the omission was unclear.

Official documents include several other passages from the journal, which ended with the message: “Inshallah [God willing] the sounds of the bombs will be heard in your streets. Gunshots to your police. Death to your oppression.”

It also saw Rahami announce his wish for “martyrdom” in the name of jihad.

It’s not “unclear.” It’s not a “coincidence” that the SAME administration that has steadfastly refused to even use phrases such as “radical Islam” or “Islamic extremism” would somehow omit the clear and obvious connection between a terrorist that Obama failed to stop and his link to the Islamic State that he has trivialized. “Unless you’re either pathologically stupid or a liberal whose goal in life is to protect Obama [and Hillary Clinton] from the consequences of their utterly failed policies.

This is yet another of now numerous attacks in the United States and thousands of attacks across the world from the Islamic State that Obama has consisntely mocked and trivalized and underestimated and ignored.

Just as Hillary Clinton totally and completely ignored desperate calls for additional security in Benghazi. And then proceeded to try to bait-and-switch “planned terrorist attack” to a “spontaneous uprising” complete with heavy mortars and detailed strategic targeting coordinates and coordinated human assault.

By the time Obama leaves office, terrorism will have skyrocketed by one-thousand, nine-hundred percent. When if it had merely increased by one-hundred percent (i.e. doubled), it would be an unforgivable failure. But if they can continue to play this game of outright, dishonest deceit, they can install another pathologically demonic failure to power for another eight years of misery both in America and around the world where fifty million children don’t have homes because of Obama’s catastrophic failure to lead anything in the right direction.

And we’re seeing at the same time the same pathological, rabid hatred for America coming from “blacks” ignited to rage and hate by Obama that we are seeing from Islamic State. Because Black Lies Matter. And Barack Obama has lied to this group and convinced them that it is white [Republican] racism that is to blame for all their woes rather than the Democrats who have led their ruined cities to despair for a century.

And so, amazingly, we are seeing rioting in cities with black mayors, black city councils, black prosecutors, black police chiefs and even black police officers who are ALL institutional Democrats. As were the ones who held these offices before them, and the ones who held office before them, etc.

Whenever a Democrat does something truly evil, the only thing to do is blame the Republicans. Blame racism. Blame white people. Blame men. Blame people who worked hard all their lives to save for their children.

And Obama has spawned a generation of butthurt black people to respond with bitterness and savage, animal hate in the face of any and all evidence and all human reason to the contrary.

Does that sound racist? Well, the black people we are watching rioting and acting like animals are not inferior because they are black; they are inferior because they are DEMOCRATS who have been imbued with the spirit of the Democrat Party. And the spirit of the Democrat Party denies that human beings are created – CREATED AND NOT EVOLVED – in the image of a holy God; and instead claims that black people and frankly all people are roaches that evolved by a meaningless, purposeless, valueless process of random evolution to be incapable of human morality and can do whatever the HELL they want because they are NOT morally accountable to any God who did NOT create them.

According to Darwinian evolution, it is no morally different for me to rape, torture and murder someone as it is to sacrifice my life for that same someone. In point of fact, it is “morally” worse according to evolution for me to sacrifice myself instead of raping; because the greatest act in evolution is to pass my DNA to the next generation. Natural Selection and Survival of the Fittest: those are the ONLY two moral teachings of evolution. If you pass on your DNA, congratulations, you belong to the “fittest.” And evolution teaches without any question that ANYTHING and EVERYTHING you have to do to ensure that outcome is the “moral” thing to do. So STEAL (for those of you in Charlotte, LOOT), RAPE, MURDER. Do whatever you have to do or for that matter want to do to ensure that you father as many children as you can, no matter how illegitimately according to meaningless biblical morays.

Violence is merely a legitimate means to an end, according to evolution.

Because right is WRONG if what Democrats believe about “science” is true.

And so why should the shocking video coming out of Charlotte be any surprise? It is ALL that these people are capable of.

Black cities are hell holes. And they are hell holes because in the wordage of Genesis 6:11 they are filled with corruption and violence in God’s sight. And they are filled with corruption and violence because they are filled with DEMOCRATS who live out the Democrat worldview and the Democrat lifestyle.

And as a result, the police do their job very, very differently. And if you want them to quit policing that way, then get your damn acts together and stop acting like Darwinian/Democrat animals.

I always marvel how the media has for DECADES refused to confront Democrats such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton with questions that would expose their rabidly hostile attitude to the God of the Bible and to what the God of the Bible teaches as right and as wrong in His Word as they falsely claim to be “Christian.” The same snide, dishonest “journalists” will do everything they can to trap every single Republican to “expose” them in some politically incorrect position that they can exploit to frame those Republicans as “hateful” or “intolerant.”

Meanwhile, consider Islam. Muhammad came along a full six centuries after Jesus. And Muhammad radically rejected Jesus and everything He stood for and everything the God of the Holy Bible stands for. Muhammad screamed, “I am not in any way, any shape or any form accountable to THAT God or what He teaches!” And not considering himself accountable in any way to the God of the Holy Bible, he proceeded to invent his OWN god. And then began to force people to believe in his god and punish and persecute and murder those who refused.

Both groups: godless Democrats who hate any god at all; and Islamic extremists who invented a god that glorifies their hate, seek to impose their truly Godless religions on the people by FORCE. And if you think Obama isn’t forcing people, just refuse to pay your taxes, or refuse to obey all the regulations Democrats have imposed, or for that matter be a Christian who refused to participate in homosexual marriage because your God of the Bible teaches you with crystal clarity that marriage is only between one man and one woman. And see what happens to you.

Both religions of Democrat Party socialist worship of the State and radical Islam invariably end in fascism and totalitarianism for a very good reason. They are both merely two variants of the same rejection of our true Creator God who made man in His own image and holds His image-bearers accountable to His ways revealed in His Word.

There is now a one-to-one correlation to the violence and hatred for America that we are seeing from Obama-inspired Black Lives Matter activists and thugs and Islamic State. They both hate police. They both hate America that is “oppressive” in the vile worldview they have been indoctrinated to believe in.

The father of Ahmad Khan Rahami, the man suspected of planting bombs in New York and New Jersey, contacted the FBI two years ago claiming his son was a terrorist, but the agency determined that he was “clean” and did not place him on a watchlist.

Mohammad Rahami said on Tuesday that he called the agency twice after violent attacks by his son on members of his family.

“Two years ago I go to the FBI because my son was doing really bad, OK?” he said. “But they check almost two months, they say, ‘He’s OK, he’s clean, he’s not a terrorist.’ I say OK.

“Now they say he is a terrorist. I say OK,” he added, speaking to reporters outside of the fried chicken restaurant he owns in Elizabeth, New Jersey.

Ahmad Rahami was arrested for aggravated assault in 2014 for allegedly stabbing his brother, but a grand jury declined to indict him. He had also hit his step-mother, his father said.

Mohammad Rahami said those attacks led him to call the FBI. During their conversations he referred to his son as a terrorist, law enforcement sources told US media.

The FBI opened an investigation but found no evidence that Ahmad Rahami had been radicalised, the sources said. It is unclear if he was interviewed at the time.

The agency is now focusing on Rahami’s trips to Afghanistan and Pakistan as it attempts to determine the motive behind the bombings, and whether he received training in bomb-making abroad.

He spent nearly a year in Pakistan from April 2013 to March 2014, during which time he married a Pakistani woman, it emerged on Tuesday.

Sorry, FBI, you got that one almost as wrong as you got it when you said that a woman who illegally installed a secret personal server to bypass the law and then destroyed every single email she didn’t want authorities to see using Bleachbit – AFTER receiving a lawful subpoena for those very records she purged – after smashing 13 cell phones and five iPads to smithereens wasn’t guilty of having done anything wrong in spite of the fact that she put all of our national secrets in the hands of our very worst enemies.

Oh, YES. There is a LOT of evidence that Hillary Clinton has been “radicalized” and has been actively plotting against America. But the Fool Bureau of Idiocy couldn’t prove it, could they.

This is NOT the first time the Obama F@#king Bureau of Incompetence had its gaze fixed on a terrorist suspect and let them go free to become a terrorist murderer; it is actually the FOURTH damn time. The FIFTH time if you count Hillary Clinton, who already murdered Americans at Benghazi and undercover CIA assets through her hacked server and whose horrors haven’t even truly begun yet.

Ignorance is bliss when Big Brother runs the show. Because knowledge will get you sent to a gulag.

The FBI won’t start hunting down terrorists until it starts hunting down Hillary.

It is an amazing thing to watch what has happened to our justice, to our national security. Both are contemptible jokes now under these obscene and demonic liberal progressives.

You could have said a year ago that the FBI was an unwilling and unwitting victim to this charade: after all, Obama and Hillary Clinton had crafted a system in which it was virtually impossible to actually compile enough evidence to INDICT somebody and convict them of a crime while at the same time making it impossible for our national security surveillance system to actually track anybody living in America. But now that the FBI helped “clear” Hillary Clinton, that is simply no longer a valid argument, any more.

Another way to put it is the FBI have become the Federal Butchers of Integrity.

Instead of “investigating,” FBI agents are now being assigned to whitewash criminal and even terrorist behavior.

The mobs of Democrat activist thugs that loot and burn and ambush-assassinate police officers in the name of “justice” chant it anyway.

Are there legitimately BAD shootings of unarmed black people? Sure there are. There are also legitimately BAD shootings of plenty of unarmed white people, by the way. But often times when there is a legitimately bad shooting of a black person, the cop who does the shooting is a star player for liberalism. In Charlotte, it was a black officer; in Tulsa, it was a female officer. Hire on the liberal “extra credit for being black or female” policy and what do you expect??? Do you want skilled police officers, or do you want politically correct police officers???

Didn’t you know that women are racists against black people??? Black people, too. All it takes is being handed a badge and a gun and poof! Instant racist!!!

It’s kind of an amazing end-of-days phenomena in which liberals exploit political correctness to put unqualified officers on the streets and then use the same political correctness to punish society for the result of the actions of the same unqualified officers they put on the streets.

Police departments across the nation are DESPERATE to hire black and female officers to appease a leftist machine that will NEVER be appeased until Dear Leader is running the world.

These Democrats have a political agenda that is truly terrifying.

They burn and loot and riot and beat Donald Trump supporters at event after event. But which side is “violent”? why, the other side, of course. How DARE Republicans stick their faces in front of Democrat fists and boots thinking they have a 1st Amendment right to peaceably assemble???

In the same way, you talk to a liberal and the war on terror was all Bush’s fault, right? I mean, Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. But he didn’t do that on a whim; he did that because we were horrifyingly attacked on 9/11 with nearly 3,000 Americans murdered. We know that al Qaeda spent three years of mostly Clinton presidency plotting that attack. But we’ve actually got liberal lunatics fool enough to believe that the whole thing was masterminded by Bush in less than eight months. And, I mean, al Qaeda didn’t start planning this attack in 1998 out of a vacuum; they did it because of YEARS of Clinton weakness and appeasement out of their view that America was a “paper tiger.”

Because we haven’t had anywhere NEAR enough vicious terrorist attacks yet.

Meanwhile, the same party that is responsible for a one-thousand, nine-hundred percent increase in terrorism is blaming the party that has been out of power SINCE that increase occurred and is actually arguing that disarming the American people is the way to keep that people safe. The “logic” is that the more dangerous the situation is, the less you should be allowed to have any chance of actually defending yourself. The “logic” is that “Donald Trump” is responsible for recruiting the Islamic State terrorists that only exist today because Barack Obama first ignored their rise, then ridiculed them as “JayVee,” then did virtually NOTHING as they created the world’s worst refugee crisis in all recorded human HISTORY. UNICEF says that FIFTY MILLION children are refugees now. And that has exploded because of one incredibly wicked man named Barack Obama and one incredibly wicked political party a.k.a. the Democrat Party.

Weakness is the worst provocation of all. Except for maybe a woman president to the outrage of men who force women to wear burkas from their heads to their toes with even their eyes veiled in many cases. So this will be your future “feminist” if Hillary Clinton is actually allowed to be our president:

Realize: to every single Democrat, THIS is “peaceful”; THIS is “tolerance.”

Barefoot, pregnant, and head-to-toe in BURKA. And women will have VOTED for it.

To be a Democrat is to be the worst form of FOOL the world has EVER SEEN.

Progressive liberal feminists rabidly despise the Christianity that gave them the most freedom that the world had ever seen. And they’ve demanded something else. Well, they’re going to GET something else – until that something else gets THEM.

If liberals had so much as a shred of integrity, no one would be fighting Islam harder. But they DON’T have a shred of integrity.

So you don your burka, Democrat woman. Because according to you, that is peaceful and tolerant and these are GOOD things, are they not???

But let’s call her by a different and more fitting name: ILLary. Because she is a sick, sick puppy in more ways than one.

It’s truly amazing. Hillary Clinton goes from having more proof than ever that yes she SHOULD have been criminally charged over her national security violations with her secret private server designed to bypass transparency and accountability laws, to proof that she was using her Clinton Foundation as a quid-pro-quo pay-to-play machine, to her vile remarks demonizing Trump supporters as racist and every other hateful thing, to this.

We now know that the Obama FBI never even CONSIDERED destruction of evidence (destroying 33,000 emails and 13 smart phones and five iPads); obstruction of justice (destroying aforementioned emails and devices AFTER learning that they were under active congressional subpoena); or lying to Congress – all federal crimes. This “investigation” was a whitewash from long before Attorney General Lynch illegally secretly met with Bill Clinton (ostensibly to discuss one another’s children?!?!?). Nor did the FBI ever consider the numerous crimes committed through and via the Clinton Foundation that was so comingled with the State Department under Hillary Clinton that the two organizations became ONE. Nor did the FBI ever bother to question how it was that a private contractor with zero security clearance was allowed to wipe and bleach a server loaded with above top secret national security information without ANY security clearance AT ALL???

Nothing to see here, folks. We’ve got nothing to hide! NOTHING!!! Well, except for that giant pile of stuff we had to hide that we destroyed, but now that it’s all gone, nothing to hide!!!

The Obama FBI asked, “How can we help you obstruct justice?” And Hillary said, “Oh, well, I’m glad that you asked!”

So let’s go from the FBI freak show to the media freak show and ask whose campaign is constantly depicted as being in meltdown? Who is constantly framed as being unfit for the office of president? Donald Trump. It’s amazing.

So in this latest installment of God proving that Hillary shouldn’t be anywhere CLOSE to the White House, let alone in the Oval Office, Hillary Clinton has not one but two savage coughing spasms last week. Everyone was talking about it – you know, everyone but the mainstream media that in typical Stalinistic fashion refused to cover it. If they did bother to talk about it, they cited the Clinton campaign line: coughing is no big deal, everybody coughs. And it’s not like her cough means she has anything bad.

Okay. So what happens next I paraphrase these guys in describing:

So Hillary Clinton – on 9/11, the anniversary of the day when you’re supposed to show STRENGTH – actually FAINTED and COLLAPSED, was grabbed by her Secret Service people, and as she’s falling down trips over her shoe and her shoe falls off. So there’s this pathetic picture now of Hillary Clinton’s lone shoe just over by the curb. Again, you couldn’t script it better than this.

Remember George W. Bush’s bullhorn speech moment? Do you remember the crowd of first responders taking courage from their commander in chief and cheering him as he delivered the greatest speech of his presidency? That was his 9/11 moment. And he passed.

Hillary Clinton had her 9/11 moment. And she fainted and collapsed and her shoe fell off and she was grabbed and hauled away and her team lied and then lied again and then lied some more and are probably still lying about what the hell she has. And she failed.

It’s like that 3AM moment she ran in her ad against Obama, and then Benghazi came and her phone rang and rang and rang until she unplugged the damn noisy thing and not one damn thing was done to stop four Americans from perishing while defending American soil on her watch.

Then the Clinton capacity for being the worst liar who ever lived started. Except for the media, where it had ALREADY started when they were confined and forced to stay in their little sheep pen for and hour and a half. We’ll talk about that in a minute.

The story was first spun by the Clintonian campaign spinners that she just left because of whatever-the-hell miscellaneous reasons. She had another event to attend, some dry cleaning to pick up, whatever. Anything but that she was starting to have a major health crisis and absolutely could not remain at the ceremony. And that was the official Stalinist position from the campaign: until it was FINALLY admitted by her dishonest and fascistically secretive staff that there might be a teensy, weensy little health issue. But even then they didn’t tell the actual truth. That cannot happen when you work for a Clinton. So the first issue they offered was that she was “overheated.” The week before New York had been warm, so why not float the global warming claim? But heck, it was 80 degrees that 9/11 anniversary day, with perfect humidity. And the fact that she was overheated was like the drug-addict starlets who are “exhausted” and so go to a rehab center, right? So that was unbelievable. So next they said she was “dehydrated.” No. Just no. Well, okay how about this one: it was allergies. Which is like the one where she had pollen-induced coughing spasms indoors with all the AC and the filters running. So she’s no longer overheated, or dehydrated, or allergic, or whatever the hell; nope, now its something else. What? Well, she had pneumonia, which we’re finally told she’d had for days without anyone bothering to notify the media that they’d kept behind a line for 90 minutes at the scene of the collapse.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign left reporters in the dark for a full 90 minutes about her health and whereabouts on Sunday after she unexpectedly left a 9/11 memorial event in New York. It took most of the day to disclose that Clinton was diagnosed with pneumonia nearly three days earlier and wasn’t simply “overheated,” as the campaign’s initial statement on Sunday said.

The campaign’s limited and confusing disclosures frustrated reporters who cover Clinton and seemed to play into health rumors that have been promoted by her Republican opponent, Donald Trump, and his surrogates and touted in conservative media outlets.

Pool reporters — those who follow the Democratic nominee into restricted spaces and provide reports to other reporters — never saw her leave the commemorative event at the World Trade Center complex in Lower Manhattan and then apparently collapse into a van. The pool was confined to a media pen out of sight of Clinton’s location. Footage of her halting departure was captured by a bystander, Zdenek Gazda, who noticed her being helped to the vehicle.

The news appears to have been broken Sunday morning on Twitter by Fox News reporter Rick Leventhal. Citing an unnamed source, Leventhal tweeted at 9:42 a.m. “Hillary Clinton ‘clearly having some medical episode’ & had to be helped into van by her protective detail at WTC.”

You know, just like the gullible little sheep they are whenever the candidate they are covering is a fellow liberal.

Did you get that? The Hillary Campaign tried to prevent the media from learning the truth as they lied and lied some more, but a bystander with a phone allowed us to know what no journalist could or would report. The press was literally CONFINED to the pen and NOT ALLOWED TO LEAVE.

And yeah, it finally took the hated Fox News to break the damn story. And every Democrat hates Fox News because every Democrat has a pathological hatred of and contempt for the TRUTH.

So what does Hillary’s staff do? She is grabbed and pushed into the van after collapsing and they take her where? The hospital? No. They take her to her daughter’s place. Maybe because there is a full-fledged medical facility there? They would have needed an X-Ray to definitively diagnose her pneumonia they now say she has. And they pump her full of whatever and she’s out hugging children with pneumonia.

I mean, I remember that’s pretty much what I did when I had pneumonia: try to pass it on to a child. Stupid snot-nosed punk kid had it coming.

You cannot accurately diagnose pneumonia – let alone what type of pneumonia somebody has – at your daughter’s apartment. If Chelsea Clinton’s apartment has a full barrage of medical equipment, that means that every single Clinton campaign member including her personal physician are intentionally trying to perpetuate a gargantuan lie about the appalling lack of fitness to be the commander in chief.

Now there’s one theory that doctor’s have offered: about a month back, a doctor offered Parkinson’s. And offered the explanation in a tightly, cogent reasoned medical case. And one of the leading causes of death from Parkinson’s is complications from pneumonia. And now more proof than ever: Hillary was wearing those anti-seizure glasses, she’s been having coughing fits, her throat is messed up, she’s having trouble swallowing. ALL critical symptoms of Parkinson’s.

This woman is having seizures, something that apparently happens fully half the time somebody does what Hillary Clinton admittedly did by passing out, hitting her head, and suffering a serious concussion:

You want to tell me I’m believing “conspiracy stories.” Well, I’ll tell you WHAT: when you destroy 33,000 emails and you physically destroy 13 phones along with other devises, my conspiracy theory is the TRUTH unless and until you produce the evidence you destroyed to prove otherwise. Especially when that stuff was under direct subpoena when you destroyed it.

Monday on NPR’s “Morning Edition,” ABC political commentator Cokie Roberts offered her thoughts on the apparent health issues regarding Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and the how the party could be looking to handle things if a replacement is needed for Clinton.

According to Roberts, there was already conversation within the party about such a possibility.

“The fact that it comes now when the polls are tightening and Democrats are already saying that Hillary was the only candidate who could not beat Trump and it is taking her off of the campaign trail, canceling her trip to California – it has them very nervously beginning to whisper about having her step aside and finding another candidate.”

Hillary Clinton has no business whatsoever being president. It was obvious like FOREVER ago. And it’s just kept getting more and more and more obvious.

And you were wicked fools for making her your candidate. And that’s why you DESERVE Donald Trump.

As poor as Hillary’s health obviously is – and it is obvious that it is terrifyingly BAD and she has surrounded herself with sycophants to shield her from people knowing the damn TRUTH including with one of her sycophants masquerading as her personal physician – that is not her primary disqualification.

It is not her sick health, it is her sick character, and yes, in this health crisis, it just got revealed AGAIN: her campaign trotted out four not just lie but damn-lie stories about her health crisis and that is why we have absolutely ZERO reason to believe the last iteration they offered. It’s her pathologically dishonest character; her deceitfulness, her deceptiveness, her truthlessness. She has simply over and over again in large ways and small ways proven that she cannot be trusted because she is literally incapable of telling the truth about ANYTHING.

Hillary Clinton is unfit for the presidency by any standard under the sun.

You know, I can’t help but remember the REAL day of 9/11, when Muslims – yes, fool, MUSLIMS in the name of ISLAM – attacked America. And I remember hundreds of people throwing themselves out of the burning World Trade Center towers to their deaths, with the choice of either being burned alive as Obama’s Islamic State does to victims or being pulverized by the impact onto concrete from a thousand foot fall. And I realize that if that attack were to happen again, Hillary Clinton, just like Barack Obama before her, would do NOTHING. There would BE no “war on terror.” Instead, Hillary Clinton would demand that millions of more Muslims be brought into America.

I think of another 9/11, and our president can’t even walk without falling or feinting, let alone LEAD.

Republicans from the presidential ticket on down pounced Saturday on Hillary Clinton’s remarks that half of Donald J. Trump’s supporters fit into a “basket of deplorables,” saying it showed she was out of touch with an economically hard-hit electorate.

Mrs. Clinton’s comments Friday night, which were a variation of a sentiment she has expressed in other settings recently, came at a fund-raiser in Manhattan.

“You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” she said to applause and laughter. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”

By Saturday morning, #BasketofDeplorables was trending on Twitter as Mr. Trump’s campaign demanded an apology. His supporters hoped to use the remark as evidence that Mrs. Clinton cannot connect to the voters she hopes to represent as president.

“Wow, Hillary Clinton was SO INSULTING to my supporters, millions of amazing, hard working people. I think it will cost her at the polls!” Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter.

Speaking at the Values Voter Summit, a gathering of Christian conservatives in Washington on Saturday, Gov. Mike Pence of Indiana, Mr. Trump’s running mate, said: “Hillary, they are not a basket of anything. They are Americans and they deserve your respect.”

By Saturday afternoon, Mrs. Clinton had acknowledged her stumble. “Last night I was ‘grossly generalistic,’ and that’s never a good idea,” she said in a statement. “I regret saying ‘half’ — that was wrong.” […]

The first thing I can’t help but notice is the title the New York Slimes chose to run this story under, fixating on the “… and the G.O.P. Pounces” part. That signifies that they are saying that this is just political posturing; Hillary didn’t say anything truly bad. It’s like her emails and her illegal secret server and her Clinton Foundation pay-for-play proofs; nothing really wrong. It must just be Republicans going after her over sheer politics. So let’s move on.

But now let’s see how the same New York Slimes covered Mitt Romney when he did something that actually wasn’t as bad either in terms of numbers (he said 47%; she said HALF) or nastiness (he insinuated that poor people would vote to get stuff without demonizing their characters; she said half of the American people are EVIL):

WASHINGTON — During a private reception with wealthy donors this year, Mitt Romney described almost half of Americans as “people who pay no income tax” and are “dependent upon government.” Those voters, he said, would probably support President Obama because they believe they are “victims” who are “entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.”

In a brief and hastily called news conference Monday just after 10 p.m., Mr. Romney acknowledged having made the blunt political and cultural assessment, saying it was “not elegantly stated,” but he stood by the substance of the remarks, insisting that he had made similar observations in public without generating controversy.

The video of Mr. Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, was made in May, offering a rare glimpse of his personal views. Mr. Romney told reporters that he had been “speaking off the cuff in response to a question” at the fund-raiser, and said he wanted “to help all Americans — all Americans — have a bright, prosperous future.”

Democrats quickly condemned the remarks as insensitive, and Mr. Obama’s campaign accused Mr. Romney of having “disdainfully written off half the nation.”

The video surfaced as the campaign enters its final 50 days and as Mr. Romney sought to restart his campaign with new ads and new messaging, in response to calls in his campaign and from outside for him to be more specific about how his policies would fix the nation’s economy and help the middle class.

Now, the video has raised the possibility that Mr. Romney’s campaign will be sidetracked, with attention focused again on his proposed tax cuts for the wealthy, the release of his personal tax returns and his ability to connect with middle-class voters. With its unvarnished language, the video seems to undermine what aides have argued is an enduring attribute that would appeal to independent voters: a sense that Mr. Romney is, at base, an empathetic and caring man.

First of all, notice in the title of the article there is no qualifying “… and Democrats Pounce.” Because on the leftist warped narrative, ONLY Republicans are capable of partisan politics. When a Republican is outraged, it is because they are playing politics; when a Democrat is outraged, it is only and always because Republicans are evil.

But second of all, I want you to notice that whether you like Romney’s remarks or not, HE WAS DEALING WITH SIMPLE FACTS. Whereas Hillary Clinton deals only with demonic slander and hate. She doesn’t have a statistic to cite (47% of Trump supporters have physically beaten or lynched a black man…”) because there AREN’T any and because the ONLY people who have physically beaten or lynched ANYONE in this campaign have been DEMOCRATS attacking Republican Trump supporters.

Mitt Romney talked about a FACT relating to 47% of the Democrat Party base; Hillary Clinton talked about a SLANDER of HALF of the Republican base. In a fair, objective world, Bloomberg would be writing the article titled, “Today Hillary Clinton Lost the Election.” But you know full damn well they won’t; because to be a “journalist” today is to be a liar who looks at every story and asks, “How do I twist this, slant this, pervert this to my ideology?”

To be a Democrat you have to HAVE a twisted and perverted ideology. And you need professionally-trained experts in deceit to rewrite the news for the people to get them to swallow those lies.

Hillary Clinton apologized, we’re told. But really? She doesn’t apologize for claiming that Trump supporters are racist; she apologizes for suggesting that “half” of them are. You know, when maybe only “47 percent” are racist.

It was an ugly comment from an ugly human being, a human being who is now proven to be pathologically unfit for the presidency by ANY measurement.

And yeah, Trump is pounding on it the SAME way Obama pounded Romney:

“People like you, you and YOU ‘deplorable,'” the ad correctly points out.

Trump said:

“At first I thought it wasn’t within the realm of possible that she said it,” he said. “She doubled up, because it was said with such anger, such unbelievable anger, and I think this is the biggest mistake of the political season. I really do. When I saw this in its full form, and I saw the anger with which she said it, the way she spoke, I think it’s the single biggest mistake of the political season.” […]

“You cannot run for president if you have such contempt in your heart for the American voter,” she said. “You can’t lead this nation if you have such a low opinion of its citizens.”

In larger context, Trump said in his speech today:

All across this country, I’ve met so many incredible members of both our military and law enforcement community. There’s nothing I’ve enjoyed more than the time I’ve spent with our service members, police officers, and also our firefighters and paramedics.

They embody the goodness and decency of our country.

I was thus deeply shocked and alarmed this Friday to hear my opponent attack, slander, smear and demean these wonderful, amazing people who are supporting our campaign.

Our support comes from every part of America, and every walk of life. We have the support of cops and soldiers, carpenters and welders, the young and the old, and millions of working class families who just want a better future.

These were the people Hillary Clinton so viciously demonized. These were among the countless Americans that Hillary Clinton called deplorable, irredeemable and un-American. She called these patriotic men and women every vile name in the book – she called them racist, sexist, xenophobic, and Islamaphobic.

She called them a “basket of deplorables” in both a speech and an interview. She divides people into baskets as though they were objects, not human beings.

Hillary Clinton made these comments at one of her high-dollar fundraisers in Wall Street.

She and her wealthy donors all had a good laugh. They were laughing at the very people who pave the roads she drives on, paint the buildings she speaks in, and keep the lights on in her auditorium.

Hillary Clinton is an insider, supported by powerful insiders, attacking Americans who have no political power.

Hillary Clinton spoke with hatred and derision for the people who make this country run.

She spoke with contempt for the people who thanklessly follow the rules, pay their taxes, and scratch out a living for their families.

While Hillary Clinton lives a sequestered life behind gates and walls and guards, she mocks and demeans hardworking Americans who only want their own families to enjoy a fraction of the security enjoyed by our politicians.

After months of hiding from the press, Hillary Clinton has revealed her true thoughts.

She revealed herself to be a person who looks down on the proud citizens of our country as subjects for her to rule over.

Her comments displayed the same sense of arrogance and entitlement that led her to violate federal law as Secretary of State, hide and delete her emails, put classified information in the reach of our enemies, lie to Congress, and sell government favors and access through her Foundation.

It’s the same attitude that explains why Hillary Clinton refuses to take accountability for the deadly disasters she helped to create in Iraq, in Syria and in Libya.

To this day, she still won’t take accountability for her role in unleashing ISIS across the Middle East – or for putting Iran on the path to a nuclear weapon.

Hillary Clinton believes she is above the law, that she is above accountability, and that she is above each and every one of you.

Our campaign is about giving voice to the voiceless. It’s about representing the forgotten men and women of this country.

I’m here to represent everyone, but especially those who are struggling against injustice and unfairness.

I am running so that the powerful can no longer beat up on the powerless. I’m running to take on the special interests, the big donors, and the corrupt political insiders.

I am running to be your voice.

If Mitt Romney disqualified himself to be president, Hillary Clinton FAR MORE disqualified herself to be president.

Not by my standard, but by everyone who votes DEMOCRAT.

And the ONLY reason Democrats will vote for Hillary Clinton now is that they are the WORST sort of people there are, vile, twisted hypocrites who will ALWAYS distort the truth and the facts and reality to suit their warped ideology.

Let me ask the question, “What is the FINAL SOLUTION” to Hillary Clinton’s now-repeated claim that Republicans are a “basket of deplorables”???

I mean, put them in death camps, or maybe Stalinistic re-education centers, right? We can’t have these hateful, awful people free to just run around with this kind of hate and evil in them.

This has ALWAYS been the invariable, inevitable path of leftism. The socialist communists were far left wing monsters; the Nazis where every damn bit as socialist and were merely to the “right” of the most far leftist communists. Hitler offered his Nazism as a “third way” between the communism of one side and the free market laissez-faire capitalism that has always been cherished by conservatives. NAZI stood for “National Socialist German Workers Party.” And if there were a “National Socialist American Workers Party,” you can’t be stupid enough not to think these wouldn’t be today’s Democrats.

Two days ago my mother told me about a man offering a solar deal coming to their home. He had lied when my father asked him if there was any investment required, but it quickly turned out that, yes, there was, because it was a “rent to own” deal. The man said there was no cost to this program; but that was just a lie to get his foot in the door and try to sell something to a couple of stupid old people. You know, in a program that wouldn’t exist unless the federal government were so massively subsidizing solar that it is beyond unreal.

After learning the truth, my parents swiftly lost interest. And the guy turned to politics, asking who they were going to vote for.

My parents said they were going to hold their nose and vote for Trump. And the guy – who said his wife was Hispanic – immediately launched into his attack. “What are you going to do when the people who do all the jobs you aren’t willing to do aren’t here?”

He attacked my parents’ religion, asking “Are they as mean as you up above?”

Well, it’s a damn good thing for that turd that I wasn’t there. Because I would have IMMEDIATELY gone after him as the racist bigot that he is. What is he saying? He’s flat-out stating that white people are lazy and indolent and incapable of doing any kind of hard labor. The Democrats have ALWAYS viewed the world through a vile, racist perspective. They just can’t help themselves. And they spent 200 years viciously attacking black people and minorities before concluding, “if you can’t beat them, co-opt them and get them on your plantation a different way.” And so now it’s just the same racism they’ve always held in reverse: now it’s white people who can’t work.

So now he’s telling us that inferior white people would STARVE because there would be no fitter race to pick their food for them.

My mom says he mentioned the guys who climb up into trees and asked my mom if she’d do that. Well, damn, you fool turd, my mom is eighty years old!!! What kind of stupid jackass ARE you? How many 80-year-old Mexicans are climbing up in trees to trim them for a damn living???

I would have been all in his face screaming, “GET OUT of here, you racist pile of bigoted rodent filth! We don’t need your kind of race-roach crawling around our home!”

Just as we don’t need Hillary Clinton anywhere near the White House.

Hillary Clinton just proved herself to be unfit for the presidency. She didn’t prove herself to be unfit by Republican standards; she proved herself to be unfit by the very same standard that was applied against Republicans by Democrats just four years ago.

Every vote for Hillary Clinton is a statement about people who support a part that is nothing but hypocritical to its very core.

It’s hard to watch a Democrat speak while drinking or eating. At some point, stuff will shoot out your nose when you hear something that is so outrageously false it is frankly beyond your body’s capacity to function in a proper manner.

LAUER: I’m going to jump in. Thank you very much for your question. Let me ask you about the Iran nuclear deal. It was signed under Secretary Kerry; it was begun under you. You started those talks.

CLINTON: Right, I did.

LAUER: You have said you expect the Iranians to cheat, you think they’ll buy time, and perhaps stay along their course to building a nuclear weapon. If they cheat, Secretary Clinton, will you have any course of action other than a military course of action? Would you enter into negotiations with again (ph)? Would you go back to economic sanctions knowing they cheated and are then closer to a nuclear weapon?

CLINTON: Matt, look, let me put this in context, because this is one of the most important strategic questions we face. When I became secretary of state, the Iranians were on a fast track to acquiring the material necessary to get a nuclear weapon. That had happened the prior eight years. They mastered the nuclear fuel cycle, they built covert facilities, they stocked them with centrifuges, and they were moving forward.

What was our decision? Our decision was to try to put together an international coalition that included Russia and China to exert the kind of pressure through sanctions that the United States alone could not do.

So it was Bush’s fault that Iran was moving toward nuclear weapons, Hillary tells us.

There are only a five things wrong with her characterization: history; reality; facts; truth; even the remotest shred of human decency that Hillary Clinton proved she is pathologically incapable of manifesting.

Let me show you where Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were in 2007 when they were doing everything they possibly could to handcuff George W. Bush from doing a single damn thing to do anything about a problem that they denied even existed when Bush said otherwise and now blame on the Bush who tried in vain to deal with the party of demonic possession otherwise known as the Democratic Party:

December 4, 2007 5:31 PMDemocratic candidates slam Bush over Iran in staid debate Democratic presidential candidates pilloried President Bush on Tuesday for saying that “nothing’s changed” in the wake of a new intelligence report concluding that Iran abandoned its nuclear weapons program in 2003.
Matt Stearns – McClatchy Newspapers

DES MOINES, Iowa — Democratic presidential candidates pilloried President Bush on Tuesday for saying that “nothing’s changed” in the wake of a new intelligence report concluding that Iran abandoned its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

“He should seize this opportunity and engage in serious diplomacy, using carrots and sticks,” New York Sen. Hillary Clinton said during a two-hour debate in Des Moines.

Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden warned that Bush’s position is “like watching a rerun of his statements on Iraq five years earlier.”

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama said “it is absolutely clear that . . . President Bush continues to not let facts get in the way of his ideology.”

All pledged aggressive, broad-based diplomacy with Iran and a break with what several of them termed the Bush administration’s “rush to war.”

Bush had argued earlier Tuesday at a White House news conference that the new intelligence report showed that Iran had formerly had a nuclear-weapons program, that pressure from the outside world had helped persuade Iran to abandon it and the lesson he drew was that Iran remains dangerous and pressure against it should continue.

At the Democrats’ debate, the other candidates continued their weeks-long criticism of Clinton for supporting a Bush-backed resolution in September that labeled Iran’s Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards said “there’s only one candidate who voted for this legislation, and it’s exactly what Bush and Cheney wanted.”

Clinton responded that the resolution had caused “changes in their behavior,” because Iran is no longer as active as it was in shipping arms and advisers to factions in Iraq.

The debate on National Public Radio focused on three areas: Iran, China and immigration. It tended to emphasize the candidates’ agreements with one another on broad policy issues, and their unanimity in opposing Bush administration policies. […]

Former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel — participating in his first debate after being excluded from recent ones — provided the most spice of the afternoon, declaring that “Iran is not a problem, never has been, never will be” and that there was nothing wrong with Iran’s Revolutionary Guard supporting the militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah because “these people are fighting for their rights. There’s something wrong with that?”

ROBERT SIEGEL [Moderator]: But the Democrats are here, and they are, from left to right on your radio dial, Senator Hillary Clinton, former Senator Mike Gravel, Senator Barack Obama, Senator Christopher Dodd, Senator Joseph Biden, former Senator John Edwards and Congressman Dennis Kucinich.

Governor Bill Richardson could not join us. He’s attending the funeral of a Korean War soldier whose remains the governor recently helped repatriate from North Korea.

So we’re going to get started with the debate, and let’s stipulate in advance what I know many feel obliged to say. We’re grateful that all of you are here, and we expect that you’re grateful to the Iowa State Historical Museum, the people of Iowa, public radio in Iowa and NPR News. And we appreciate that and hope we can move on to the topic of Iran.

The new National Intelligence Estimate contains a major change. It says that Iran stopped its nuclear weapons program in the fall of 2003. Today President Bush said that nothing’s changed in light of the report. He said the NIE, the National Intelligence Estimate, doesn’t do anything to change his opinion about the danger Iran poses to the world.

For all of you — and let’s go left to right across the radio dial — do you agree with the president’s assessment that Iran still poses a threat? And do you agree that the NIE’s news shows that isolation and sanctions work?

Senator Clinton.

SEN. HILLARY CLINTON: Well, I’m relieved that the intelligence community has reached this conclusion, but I vehemently disagree with the president that nothing’s changed and therefore nothing in American policy has to change.

I have for two years advocated diplomatic engagement with Iran, and I think that’s what the president should do. He should seize this opportunity and engage in serious diplomacy, using both carrots and sticks. I think we do know that pressure on Iran does have an effect. I think that is an important lesson. But we’re not going to reach the kind of resolution that we should seek unless we put that into the context of a diplomatic process.

SIEGEL: Thank you, Senator Clinton.

Senator — former Senator Mike Gravel.

MR. MIKE GRAVEL: Iran’s not a problem, never has been, never will be.

What you’re seeing right here is something very unique, very courageous. What the intelligence community has done is drop-kicked the president of the United States. These are people of courage that have watched what the president is doing, onrush to war with Iran.

And so by releasing this information, which is diametrically opposed to the estimate that was given in ’05 by showing that there is no information to warrant what the White House has been doing, they have now boxed in the president in his ability to go to war. So, my hat is off to these courageous people within the bureaucrats — bureaucracy of the intelligence community.

Now let me replay two statements from last night and from 2007 and you tell me who nailed it and who was demon-possessed STUPID:

Matt, look, let me put this in context, because this is one of the most important strategic questions we face. When I became secretary of state, the Iranians were on a fast track to acquiring the material necessary to get a nuclear weapon. That had happened the prior eight years. They mastered the nuclear fuel cycle, they built covert facilities, they stocked them with centrifuges, and they were moving forward. — Hillary Clinton, last freaking night on national television

2007 debate question: “The new National Intelligence Estimate contains a major change. It says that Iran stopped its nuclear weapons program in the fall of 2003. Today President Bush said that nothing’s changed in light of the report. He said the NIE, the National Intelligence Estimate, doesn’t do anything to change his opinion about the danger Iran poses to the world…. do you agree with the president’s assessment that Iran still poses a threat?”
Hillary Clinton’s answer: SEN. HILLARY CLINTON: “Well, I’m relieved that the intelligence community has reached this conclusion, but I vehemently disagree with the president that nothing’s changed and therefore nothing in American policy has to change.”

To be a Democrat is to be a demon-possessed slandering liar and a demon-possessed coward; it means blaming your opponent for causing a problem that YOU created.

Hillary Clinton openly acknowledged in the Commander-in-Chief Forum last night that “the Iranians were on a fast track to acquiring the material necessary to get a nuclear weapon” and “that had happened the prior eight years” before she and Obama started screwing up planet earth far more than it already was.

We have it in FACT and in HISTORY and in TRUTH and in REALITY that George W. Bush was RIGHT and that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were filled with demons that spouted lies through the anal orifices under their noses.

And now this craven, cowardly, lying, dishonest, deceitful witch wants to blame George Bush for not doing anything about a problem he TRIED to deal with but that every single Democrat did everything in their rabid, treasonous little cockroach brains to prevent him from dealing with.

And now it’s suddenly “Bush’s fault” again.

Bush said, “Iran is still pursuing nuclear weapons” and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and every single Democrat said “I vehemently disagree.”

And now this abject moral and intellectual disgrace wants to take her incompetent stupid to the White House which she has proven she will sell out to the highest foreign bidder.

Let’s revisit the final 2012 presidential debate, the moment Romney explained himself and the president went for the lulz. Here’s Obama.

Governor Romney, I’m glad that you recognize that Al Qaida is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia, not Al Qaida; you said Russia, in the 1980s, they’re now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because, you know, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.

But Governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s.

And here’s Romney:

Russia I indicated is a geopolitical foe… and I said in the same — in the same paragraph I said, and Iran is the greatest national security threat we face. Russia does continue to battle us in the U.N. time and time again. I have clear eyes on this. I’m not going to wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to Russia, or Mr. Putin. And I’m certainly not going to say to him, I’ll give you more flexibility after the election. After the election, he’ll get more backbone.

The smug self-assuredness that often suffices for expertise on cable news was perhaps never more smug than when former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney warned the American public that Russia was rapidly positioning itself as America’s “number one geopolitical foe.” Among the worst offenders were the hosts and guests who provide MSNBC with content on a daily basis.

In early 2012, President Barack Obama was caught on an open microphone telling Russia’s then-President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have more “flexibility” after the presidential election in his dealings with Russia. Romney reacted strongly to that comment. Appearing on CNN, the GOP nominee said that the United States should regard Russia as a geopolitical adversary and should work to limit Russia’s flexibility rather than to secure it. His observation was soundly criticized by the president’s defenders who, at the time, were still attempting to rehabilitate Obama’s floundering “Reset” with Russia.

There were few who defended Romney’s comments. Even snake-bit Republicans, chastened by the swift backlash in the media, hedged when asked to back up Romney’s assessment of the challenges posed by Moscow. But MSNBC’s wagons circled particularly quickly in defense of the president. Volley after volley of snark was lobbed in the GOP nominee’s direction.

“I don’t know what decade this guy’s living in,” MSNBC host Chris Matthews said with a sigh on March 28, 2012. “Is he trying to play Ronald Reagan here, or what?”

“This is Mitt Romney’s severely conservative problem,” University of Georgia professor Cynthia Tucker opined on-the-air. “It made Romney look dumb. He’s not a dumb man, but he said something that was clearly dumb.”

Huffington Post reporter Sam Stein agreed that Romney’s statement was evidence of an “antiquated worldview.” He fretted further about how Romney, should he become president, would enter the office having severely complicated America’s bilateral relations with Moscow given his carelessly provocative statement.

Do you realize how completely WRONG you have to be about EVERYTHING to be a Democrat???

KEANE: …We may have some politicized generals if that’s what he’s implying, but the reality is that every major force level decision, Megyn, that our generals have made, this president has rejected. In the early 2009, a campaign plan developed by Petraeus and General McChrystal to defeat the Taliban, they required a minimum force of 40,000.

President Obama rejected that recommendation and provided 25 percent less. He also decided he would pull the force out in 12 to 15 months. Those two decisions doomed Afghanistan to the current state we find it now, a protracted stalemated war and robbed us of the opportunity for victory. In 2011, General Alston, four-star commander in Iraq, recommended to the President, a force level of over 20,000. The President rejected it and pulled out all the forces with what is now known as a disastrous consequence in Syria.

In 2012, General Dempsey, General Petraeus directed the CIA, Secretary Panetta and Secretary Clinton recommended to the president robustly arm and train the Syrian moderates. He says no. In 2013, conduct a military strike, same national security team, against the Assad regime because he violated the chemical red line. He says no. In Afghanistan —

KELLY: I get your point. You could go on. But your point is Trump is not wrong that, if you think about it, the generals have been reduced to rubble. In other words, they’ve been reduced to almost useless because whatever they tell this commander-in-chief, he disregards.

General Keane could go on, and he did:

KEANE: Yes, and then in 2014, what happened is as opposed to asking him what are we going to do about ISIS? He says, I want to destroy ISIS after they beheaded our Americans and invaded Iraq. He tells them what they’re not going to do. No boots on the ground. The minimum 300 advisors. Of course he’s changed that nine times. An air campaign with no civilian casualties and we’re not going to be able to provide an air/ground team to help make that campaign more effective. We have never, ever have those kinds of restrictions placed on us in my understanding of military history in this nation. That’s the truth of it. Those kinds of restrictions are unprecedented.

In other words, it’s the TRUTH that Obama has reduced our generals to a pile of useless rubble by rejecting their military expertise every single time they offered it, but it’s evil to tell the truth. Because probably the quintessential essence of being a Democrat today is finding the truth to be evil. It is absolutely immoral for Democrats who spent the last eight years rejecting every piece of military advice the generals gave to say that Donald Trump just insulted the generals who HAVE BEEN reduced to a pile of rubble by a pathetic fool commander-in-chief.

Democrats tell us that the Trump slogan “Make America great again” is somehow hateful and anti-American. Because in their warped, wicked view, America is “great” when it is weak and disgraced and punked by every rogue dictator and totalitarian nation on earth.

Meanwhile, at home, the Democrats have warred against our police departments and labeled them as racist death squads while amazingly simultaneously trying to disarm the people so the very police they demonize are our only protection.

Because Democrats are trying to set up a national internal police force apparatus – an NKVD or a Gestapo – that they will be able to “fundamentally transform” into a political weapon against conservatives much the way they have already weaponized our court system against conservatives.

Because to be a Democrat is to be the very worst kind of fool.

America will never be safe until every single Democrat has been hunted down with dogs and burned alive, I tell you.

So let’s start with the current story of the vile punk rapist who got a joke six-month sentence which was apparently twice as harsh as it should have been given the fact that they released him in three.

And decent people are left saying, “What the hell…?”

And the ONLY reason liberals are angry is because women constitute one of the perennial victim classes that make up the left. And how dare you prey on one of our victim classes when it is our coalition of victim classes that is supposed to be able to ride political correctness to exploit everyone else instead?

I recently read an LA Times op ed titled, “Understanding the Nate Parker scandal” by Michael Eric Dyson in which the author rehashes every leftist slogan as he tries to swim through the waters of liberal butthurt women and black butthurt activists who both demand that their sacred cows remain sacred. I mean, gosh, they’re both such victims, and what happens when one liberal protected victim class preys on another liberal victim class? It’s GOT to be the white man’s fault; it’s just GOT to. So the conclusion of the article would seem to be that every time a black man rapes a white woman, a white male should do hard, painful time for it. Because otherwise the piece was a load of patronizing leftist drivel.

Allow me to dive in – since this is a story about a rapist swimmer – and offer my own op ed on the gist of this despicable story. Brock Turner is an entitled punk who doesn’t believe he should be held responsible for his own actions; Stanford is one of the most leftist liberal progressive major universities in the nation, and “college rape culture” is the inevitable result of leftist Darwinian values, in that order.

We start with this pathetic little worm Brock Turner and the sense of entitlement that permeates his little roach soul. The view is, “If I want something, someone else should provide it for me.” You know, like if I want your money, I should vote for the government to confiscate it from hard-working people and redistribute it to me. As I will say throughout here, it’s just the exact same entitlement worldview on a different entitlement stage. I want your hard-earned money and you won’t give it up to me unless I redistribute it to myself; I want your sex and you won’t give it to me unless I can redistribute your unconscious body behind a dumpster. Either way, I’m taking something that isn’t mine, and I ought to be able to do it because after all, I’m entitled and somebody somewhere owes me what I want but can’t obtain the honest way by legitimately working for it.

“Affluenza” is the latest form of stupid entitlement excuses. It wasn’t Brock Turner’s fault, it was “the whole rotten village,” right? But ALL of these damn excuses are vile. “I did it because I’m rich and white” is no more morally shame-worthy of an excuse than “I did it because I’m poor and black.” And I simply state for the record that accepting the latter entitlement excuse guaranteed that the former one would ultimately succeed, too. So black writer Michael Eric Dyson, trying to explain or better-yet explain away Nate Parker’s behavior, blames it on “jock culture” and “male privilege.” How about you did it because you’re a bad person and you’re going to pay the consequences of your depraved actions?

If you live by victim mentality, you ought to die by victim mentality. Because sooner or later, you whiny victim, there will come a more whiny victim than you. And so now the feminists who “fundamentally transformed” women into a victim class are aghast and appalled because male rapists are themselves victims.

It’s like liberal heroine Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who falsely claimed special status because she believes that somewhere in her family ancestry going back to the dinosaurs, somebody was a Native American. It’s like that, because somewhere sometime I was a victim of something. And I’m not responsible because after all, I’m a victim and I’ve got the entitled whining to prove it.

And thank you, liberalism. That whole load of crap would have been impossible without the toxic pile of fecal matter that is your worldview.

Over the same period, the number of academics identifying as “moderate” fell by 13 percentage points, and the share of “conservative” and “far-right” professors dropped nearly six points. In the academy, liberals now outnumber conservatives by roughly 5 to 1. Among the general public, on the other hand, conservatives are considerably more prevalent than liberals and have been for some time.

The college “rape culture” is out of control. And you’ll find that “over the same period” that liberalism came to so entirely dominate college/university culture, rape culture came right along with it.

And the horror that results in society is equally true of the individual who lives by Darwinism.

Why do we as individuals rape, murder and sleep around? Because – and I quote – “rape is (in the vernacular of evolutionary biology) an adaptation, a trait encoded by genes that confers an advantage on anyone who possesses them. Back in the late Pleistocene epoch 100,000 years ago, men who carried rape genes had a reproductive and evolutionary edge over men who did not: they sired children not only with willing mates, but also with unwilling ones, allowing them to leave more offspring (also carrying rape genes) who were similarly more likely to survive and reproduce, unto the nth generation. That would be us. And that is why we carry rape genes today. The family trees of prehistoric men lacking rape genes petered out.” Darwinism is “a scientific idea that, if true, consigns traditions of self-restraint, loyalty, the very basis of family life, to the shredder.” Now go ye and do likewise. Unless something inside of you screams “NO! I will NOT live in accordance with that terrible, wicked, demonic theory of Darwinian evolution!”

If you can murder a baby, you can certainly whitewash away the act that led to the creation of that baby.

I love the Word of God, which is WHY I so passionately reject liberal progressivism which is so totally the denial of the Word of God and the God of the Bible as it is dominated by secular humanism, atheism, Darwinism, postmodernism, existentialism, behaviorism and every other vile form of “-ism” there is. God’s Word declares:

Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from God – Colossians 2:8

Claiming to be wise, they instead became utter fools. – Romans 1:22

… always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth. – 2 Timothy 3:7

Whatever progressive liberalism touches, it infects with cancer. It touched Brock Turner, just as it touched our societal acceptance of drugs and alcohol, touched our abandonment of God and His morality in favor of the amoral nihilism of Darwinism, touched the embrace of personal responsibility and replaced it with the denial of the same and the embrace of the entitlement and victimhood mindset.

You “carry your rape genes,” liberal; I’ll carry my Bible.

And the empirical fact of the matter is that the morality that comes from my Bible is so vastly superior to the depraved bile that comes out of your university system that it is far more beyond belief than the belief in God that you so ardently deny.