Poor Justification

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

THE RECENT Supreme Court ruling justifying the seizure of a woman's car because of her husband's illicit sexual activity in the vehicle is ridiculous - and a disaster.

It is a sad commentary when our highest court becomes an accomplice to confiscatory practices and the enforcement of greedy and irresponsible laws.

The unfounded legal justification for the findings, in this case, was supported by a majority of jurists on our highest court. This decision certainly challenges the competence of those justices who supported this finding.

It is noteworthy that those who supported this erroneous conclusion were appointees of past conservative regimes, nominally concerned about the intrusiveness of government. Their hypocrisy is obvious.