Strategists Work for The Industry, Oppose Fracking Ban

by Leslie Layton

When Robin Cook addressed Butte County supervisors to ask for a 30-day study on a ballot initiative that would ban fracking, she talked convincingly about her concern for her father’s —and the county’s— finances.

“My family owns property that has a capped well,” she told supervisors at their July 29 meeting. “From what we can understand … this would be a takings of our property. The debate today is about the … petition coming before you and whether or not that language is bankruptcy language for this county. Nobody wants to see this county be lost in a big old mess of lawsuits.”

But Cook failed to mention that she has another interest in the matter: the firm she reportedly helps run with her husband, political strategist Josh Cook, has earned $37,500 providing consulting and other services to a Big Oil-funded group, Californians for Energy Independence. The payments to JFW Cook Corp. show up in campaign-finance disclosure reports made to the Secretary of State for the May-June period.

JFW Cook Corp. is Josh Cook’s firm, Cook Communications and Government Affairs. Listed as president on the firm’s website is Cook’s wife, Robinette Scott Cook. Josh Cook is a longtime local Republican consultant who’s worked with former U.S. Rep. Wally Herger, state Assemblyman Dan Logue and Supervisor Steve Lambert when he was a member the Paradise Town Council.

When contacted later, Robin Cook said her family has owned a gas well in Gridley for many years and she is concerned about losing the rights to extract its resource. “It’s in our peach orchard,” she wrote in an email to the Chico News & Review. “I work for the industry trying to protect our rights to safe and secure energy production.”

The typical “taking” results when a government seizes private property and must pay just compensation; but in some cases, when government regulation renders a piece of property worthless or worth much less than its previous value, it is argued that it’s in effect a taking.

Another firm listed on the disclosure form is Public Square Partners LLC, which received $10,000 on May 29. The only listed member of that organization is David S. Reade, son-in-law of the late Assemblyman Bernie Richter and one-time chief of staff to former Assemblyman and current U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa.

Californians for Energy Independence still had $1.3 million in its coffers at the end of June. Contributions to the group had been made by a number of oil and gas companies, including Chevron, Vaquero Energy and Freeport-McMoRan Oil and Gas.

The campaign-finance reports show that the political action committee “Californians for Energy Independence, including Energy Producers” spent a total of $116,238 during May and June to stop the advancing Butte County ballot initiative.

During this period, initiative backers Frack-Free Butte County overcame a legal challenge — also financed by the committee— that questioned the petition’s phrasing, font size and bolding of certain passages. Butte County Superior Court Judge Robert Glusman ruled the petition complies with the state electoral code and ordered the county to move forward with the process.

On July 28, the County Clerk’s Office validated almost 8,000 signatures on the petition, enough to move it forward. But on July 29, the supervisors were faced with the sudden emergence of a group of people who said they opposed the ban on fracking or immediate action on the ballot initiative.

Many of the people speaking against approval of the initiative asked for a 30-day study, leading some anti-fracking activists to suspect that the opposition had been orchestrated by well-financed opponents who briefed people on the study option in advance of the meeting.

Frack-Free Butte County Treasurer Joni Stellar, who went to court pro per to successfully stave off the legal challenge from a San Rafael law firm, was incensed. “Nobody asked for a study until this 11th hour,” Stellar said. “It’s a delay tactic.”

The supervisors voted 4-1 to take the initiative under study for 30 days, making it impossible to approve it in time to appear on the November ballot. It had to be approved no fewer than 88 days before the election, making the deadline Aug. 8. Now Butte County citizens won’t vote on the matter until 2016 unless there is a special state election to which the matter could be added. County counsel is continuing to work on a fracking-control ordinance of its own, as directed by a 4-1 supervisor vote in April.

Earlier on July 29, Robin Cook assumed the role of spokeswoman for an unusual protest outside supervisor chambers. A number of people hoisted signs championing private-property rights and opposing the ballot initiative. They pointed reporters to Robin Cook, who said a 30-day study would ensure “good policy.”

Cook then told supervisors that the anti-fracking activists should have waited for the county to draft its ordinance, and pointed out that County Counsel Bruce Alpert has said he’s concerned about language in the citizen-drafted ordinance.

“I have put blood, sweat and tears into my dad’s land, and I don’t want to see us put something on the ballot that will bankrupt us,” Cook said.

Maureen Kirk was the only supervisor to vote against the motion to study the ballot initiative for 30 days, although she indicated the study could be useful and said Robin Cook’s comments concerned her. But she said she was also concerned about respecting the ballot-initiative process. “All these people, they got these signatures without a paid consultant,” Kirk said. “They did it with their blood, sweat and tears. To not put it on the ballot doesn’t seem right.”

Californians for Energy Independence

Expenditures in Butte County , May-June 2014

Opposing prohibition on well stimulation treatments

5/07

Amplified Strategies

Mailer and phone bank

$27,809.00

5/07

Position Interactive Inc

Website design

$300.00

5/09

Baselice & Associates Inc.

Survey

$34,455.00

5/14

JFW Cook Corporation

Consulting

$12,500.00

5/16

Redwood Pacific Public Affairs

Design Logos

$4,739.07

5/29

Public Square Partners LLC

Consulting

$5,000.00

5/29

Public Square Partners LLC

Consulting

$5,000.00

6/13

Redwood Pacific Public Affairs

Travel expenses

$46.94

6/27

JFW Cook Corporation

Consulting

$12,500.00

6/27

JFW Cook Corporation

Consulting

$12,500.00

Excerpted from Secretary of State Campaign Finance committee expenditure reports.

This story was written in collaboration with the Chico News & Review. Check it out on the CN&R website here.

Terms of Service

Sergeant’s chokehold leads to trial, acquittal

Chapman Elementary student handcuffed

Video of an 8-year-old boy who was handcuffed by sheriff's deputies and Chico police officers has caused alarm on social media. The video was published by Sherri Quammen following the Oct. 18 incident.