President Trump's announcement that the US would be withdrawing its entire contingent of 2,000 troops from Syria amid the defeat of Daesh (ISIS)* has shaken pro-war officials and lawmakers across Washington, prompting to a string of resignations of senior administration members, including (now-ex) Pentagon chief Jim Mattis.

Senior South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a long-time critic of Donald Trump's foreign policy, has lashed out at acting Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan on the Pentagon's Syria policy. The Washington Post detailed the harsh exchange between Graham and Shanahan at the Munich Security Conference last week, which reportedly included the senator blasting the defence secretary on the US' 30 April withdrawal deadline.

The Republican senator then began listing off a series of terrible consequences that a US withdrawal would mean, including the return of Daesh, Turkish forces attacking Syria's Kurds, and Iran gaining an 'advantage' in the country.

"That could very well happen," Shanahan reportedly replied. "Well, if the policy is going to be that we are leaving by 30 April, I am now your adversary, not your friend," Graham retorted.

Other lawmakers, both Republican and Democrat, reportedly voiced similar frustrations with Shanahan, describing him as a "deer in the headlights", and complaining that all he did was repeat the president's instructions, without elaborating.

New Jersey Democratic Senator Bob Menendez complained to WaPo that Shanahan basically "got a chorus of voices that basically said, 'This is not going to work, there is a bipartisan resolve not to let this happen, and you need to send a message back to the president that there's a combined, unified view that this is not the way to go and he should change course'."

Social media users were not amused by Senator Graham's expletive-filled rant, recalling his otherwise subservient attitude toward the president, or accusing him of being a war hawk.

President Trump's announcement that the US would be withdrawing its forces from Syria was met with hostility among the majority of Republicans and Democrats in Congress, and led to a series of high profile resignations, including Defence Secretary Jim Mattis, special anti-Daesh coalition envoy Brett McGurks, DoD spokeswoman Dana White, and Pentagon Chief of Staff Kevin Sweeney.

While agreeing with the president on most domestic issues, Senator Graham has been a longtime critic of Trump on foreign policy. In early 2017, shortly after his election, Trump lashed out at Graham and (now deceased) Senator John McCain on Twitter, advising that the pair focus "their energies on ISIS, illegal immigration and border security instead of always looking to start World War III."

The Syrian government has repeatedly criticised the deployment of US troops on its soil, calling it an illegal violation of the country's territorial integrity, and demanding that Washington withdraw immediately. The US military presence presently includes a base in at-Tanf, along the Syrian-Jordanian border, and deployments in northeastern Syria alongside US-backed Syrian Kurdish militia.

*A terrorist group outlawed in Russia and many other countries.

R ~ 'Are you telling our allies that we are going to go to zero by April 30th?'Um... perhaps Mr. Graham might want to list just who those 'allies' might be? Daesh*? Kurds? Saudi Arabia? Israel? He is not the least worried about the sentiments of his 'allies' for the simple reason that those trying to seize Syria are all allies of the same club, whatever country their leaders hail from.

Those not in the club are the enemy of the (((deep state))) and it's designs on Syria, and now on Venezuela, not by choice but by the imperial roots of the club that presumes ownership of our world and marches it's armies where they will.

This man sucked hard to stay in Trump's circle but his handlers are pushing him to let loose on El Presidente. His face alone speaks volumes.

Gay boy Graham ought to pick up a M16 and go over there to handle Daesh himself since he's such a tough guy. What a pathetic, cowardly POS...

Quote

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?