end justifies the means?

the lord, being abve the law of karma, did adopt means fair or ''foul'', end justifying the means

1 to subdue bali, vaman asked a 3 feet land ,using the weakness/virtue, daana , of bali ,occupied the heaven and earth in two steps, impelling bali to offer his head to rest the third step on his head, only to be sent to paathaala

2 to subdue vaali, ram killed him hiding behind a tree, not a way for a kshathriya to fight with an opponent

3 to end bhasmasur, vishnu turned into mohini, overtly covertly deceived him into keeping his hand over his head as a nruthya bhangima

4 to avert the danger of asur sipping the amruth, emerged as result of a combined eff****f sur and asur, in saagar manthan the lord again did deprive them of their share, pouring amruth only to deva[rahukethu escaping]

really inexplicable are the ways of lord!

[prabhu needu mahima theliyaga vashama]

lord, is the purest of the pure, the paramaathma, the self

sword cannot cut it

fire cannot burn it

water cannot wet it

air cannot dry it

but formortals the law of karma does prevail

inescapable are the consequences of a karma, what ever may be the end , even unknowingly done

however for a realized individual [adishankara]

Recommended By Colombia

yadyadkarma karomi thath thath akhilam

shambho thava aaradhanam

so to rise above the law of karma, a mortal has to rise to the level of the lord, to enjoy a similar privilege and freedom–of adopting any means towards a good end

conversely, end does justify the means, in the case of arealized individual only