Rambles about stuff I like.

You shouldn’ta done that, he’s just a boy

So… how ’bout all them abortions? Pretty controversial, right? Let me tell you why both sides of the debate are wrong.

First off, the anti-abortion side has got to stop calling fetuses babies. Fetuses live inside the womb, babies live outside the womb. Boom, very simple distinction. So that abortions is not equal to killing babies, it’s killing a fetus. And there’s a big difference there.

For starters, there’s this thing called ‘spontaneous abortion’, which affects about 20% of all births. Source. So all that hoohah about how God doesn’t want dead fetuses, well, you’re wrong – apparently God wants 1 out of every 5 fetuses for himself.

Further, what if the parents learn within a month of conception that the child is horribly deformed, and if carried to term, has a high probability of killing the mother, and the child, if successfully born, will be in constant agony for the remainder of its days, and have a high likelihood of dying before it’s 1st birthday. But if the parents opted for an abortion, they would be spared untold misery.

Finally, I can’t stand those anti-abortioners who insist upon the mother carrying the baby to term in cases of rape or incest. For rape – do you really want to punish the poor girl who was raped by having her give birth to a constant reminder of that event? What’s she going to tell the child when he or she grows up. “You’re daddy was a brutal rapist, who punched me in the head when he was done and left me in a filthy alley.” And incest, dear lord – you know why dalmatians are such shitty dogs? Because of inbreeding. Inbreeding is a fancy dog-raising word for incest. Do you really want a woman to have to bear offspring with a high chance of deformities, disorders and crazy health problems? Not to mention just how gross incest is in the first place.

As for the pro-abortioners, it pisses me off when you keep spouting, “It’s a woman’s right to choose.” Really? Did the woman get pregnant through spontaneous human parthenogenesis? No, she didn’t? Then the father should have some say in the matter.

The people who are for abortion seem to conveniently forget that it takes two people to conceive. But when it comes to abortion time, all the man can do is either accept that the woman will have an abortion, or be on the hook for child support for 18 years.

There’s such a thing as sperm rape. That’s when a woman claims she’s on the pill when she’s not in order to get pregnant. (Or, more nefariously, when a woman steals sperm from a used condom.) So the man was fooled into conception – but now he has to live with whatever decision the woman is going to make. What bullshit. It’s a woman’s right to choose, and the man has no rights.

If a woman becomes pregnant through sperm rape, I sort of think she’s given up the right to choose. Certainly rapists don’t have any parental rights, why should sperm rapists be allowed to collect cash for 18 years (and possibly more.)

So there you have it. When it comes to abortion, neither side is right.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to get laid! She said she’s on the pill so I’m raw doggin’ it tonight!

“…do you really want to punish the poor girl who was raped by having her give birth to a constant reminder of that event?”

Why is the solution to punish the poor unborn child by terminating its existence? Two wrongs don’t make a right. Besides, the mother can put the child up for adoption. Its life, even conceived under such circumstances, ought to be its own.