This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising.
By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy.
You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site.
To learn more see our Cookies Policy.

The airline says it would redeploy aircraft if infrastructure isn’t improved.

THE CHIEF OPERATIONS Officer at Aer Lingus says that relations with the company which runs Dublin Airport have “soured immensely” over upgrades to the airport.

The former national carrier has previously signalled its dissatisfaction over what it called “unacceptable infrastructural deficits” at the airport.

In July, Willie Walsh – the chief executive of IAG, the company that owns Aer Lingus and British Airways – said the group is unhappy with how Dublin Airport has handled its “infrastructural bottlenecks”.

Specifically, the airline is concerned that the baggage system, parking stands and taxiways are not up to scratch.

Speaking to reporters in Dublin yesterday, Aer Lingus COO Mike Rutter said that the standoff had seen relations between the two sides sour in recent months.

Relations have soured immensely between ourselves and Dublin Airport over the past few months.

“(This happened) when it became apparent that the ambition we have to prosecute an agenda of growth into Dublin has not yet been matched.”

He said that Aer Lingus would continue to meet with DAA chief executive Dalton Philips in order to repair the relationship.

Investment

With Aer Lingus set to spend around €1 billion on eight new aircraft earmarked for stationing at Dublin, it may seem somewhat inconsistent that they would be worried about current infrastructure.

But Rutter says that those “infrastructural pinch points” can be overcome.

“We genuinely believe we can overcome the infrastructure issues. I’m a great believer that you need to show the ambition of your business.

“You hope that others can catch up with you, can work with you and can deliver.

“If that ambition is met, it’s absolutely fine. If not, then in the long-term we will have to consider where aircraft get deployed.

“The management team here in Dublin have one ambition that (the new aircraft) are deployed here and used for the good of the Irish economy.”

The Aer Lingus stance comes at a time of ambitious expansion, but its demands that there is investment in Dublin Airport are contrary to its stance in 2014.

At the time of the last Commision for Aviation Regulation review of capacity at Dublin Airport, Aer Lingus said that no investment was needed. Its submission does not mention baggage, gates or taxiways. The document covered a five-year investment cycle from 2015-2019.

The submission says that current infrastructure could be better utilised. In fact, it argued that DAA’s capital expenditure plans were too ambitious.

“There is no pressing need for further capacity expansion in the coming period.

“[M]ore efficient use of the runway infrastructure at Dublin could delay the need for another runway for a significant number of years, which would push the need back to the 2025-29 regulatory period at the earliest.

In Aer Lingus’ opinion, this plan, overall, is larger than is necessary for a period that involves no justifiable case for significant capacity expansion.

Since that submission was made, Aer Lingus has been taken over by airline group IAG and transformed its business through expansion and leveraging Dublin’s location as a transatlantic hub.

A Dublin Airport spokesperson said:

“Dublin Airport is managed in the best interests of the Irish economy to grow connectivity and to meet the needs of all of its airline customers rather than just one.

Dublin Airport is currently investing about €100 million per year to upgrade its facilities and we will shortly present proposals for an enhanced an investment programme to our airline customers for consultation. As part of our investment in new capacity a new boarding gate area will open later this year, which will be used by Aer Lingus flights among others.

“We welcome Aer Lingus’ decision to launch a new Dublin-Philadelphia service next year and to continue to expand its overall transatlantic business at Dublin Airport.”

Terminal velocity

Terminal 2 at Dublin Airport.
Source: Laura Hutton/RollingNews.ie

Part of a solution, Rutter indicated, would be for Aer Lingus to have its own terminal. Last year the Department of Transport announced that it has published a request for tenders (RFT) to conduct a report titled, ‘A review of future capacity needs at Ireland’s state airports’.

The notice asked tenderers to “assess the relative advantages and disadvantages of the funding and operation of Terminal 3 by the existing airport operator in comparison to being operated on an independent basis”.

Rutter indicated that if Terminal 2 was up for sale, which it is not, Aer Lingus could be interested in buying it.

Aer Lingus would like to own or be the anchor tenant of Terminal 2 and being the key player in that marketplace. Our genuine desire is to be a major contributor to the development of Terminal 2 and for it to become a proper hub terminal that allows Ryanair do what they need to do in Terminal 1 and us do what we need to do in Terminal 2.

“If the solution to that equation is to create a third terminal, managed by whoever, and take some of the noise out of Terminal 2, we wouldn’t be against that.

TheJournal.ie is a full participating member of the Press Council of Ireland and supports
the Office of the Press Ombudsman. This scheme in addition to defending the freedom of the
press, offers readers a quick, fair and free method of dealing with complaints that they may
have in relation to articles that appear on our pages. To contact the Office of the
Press Ombudsman Lo-Call 1890 208 080 or go to
www.pressombudsman.ie
or www.presscouncil.ie

Please note that TheJournal.ie uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. For more information on cookies please refer to our cookies policy.

Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for user created content, posts, comments, submissions or preferences. Users are reminded that they are fully responsible for their own created content and their own posts, comments and submissions and fully and effectively warrant and indemnify Journal Media in relation to such content and their ability to make such content, posts, comments and submissions available. Journal Media does not control and is not responsible for the content of external websites.