I have often wondered what fuels the alt-right, or ultra right's absolute loathing of liberals to the extent that liberals are seen as more harmful than beneficial in modern America. However, it is now clear to me that there is a generational component that I had overlooked before. I'm not saying conservatives don't do the same things, but somewhere along the way, fighting for civil rights has become a close minded, fanatical march of censorship and victimization.

My oldest kid heads off to college this fall. However, college has really changed since I went 30 years ago. Consider this article--

First off, I hope a lot more people read that today, and I think they will since David Brooks links to it in his column (conservative?) in the New York Times today. When I was in school there was still an idea that you tried to learn about all ideas and then decide what you agree with. Now it seems that people decide what they agree with and then protest everybody else. That is the most short sided and idiotic approach to making progress on social issues I have ever heard. In some ways, I feel I have a greater understanding for why certain people see this type of liberal as an intellectual hazard. How the fuck can somebody claim to be fighting for rights and then try to censor free speech?

What the hell happened to "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

The sad part of all of this is that the partisanship and mistrust has gotten so bad that it is hard enough to build bridges even when you have an opportunity to hear somebody from different views speak. But to actively try to silence them?? Holy fuck! It's absolute madness. Isn't college supposed to be the ideal of intellectual freedom, an arena of ideas? It seems to me that somewhere along the way the culture of identity commodified the institution of learning as a platform for self aggrandizement and esteemed as worthless the idea that we should be challenging ourselves with new and different ideas without judgment. If this is what college is now, I don't want my kid to go.

Just to restate what should be obvious, liberals used to be about giving the little guy and the oppressed a voice and opposing tax cuts for the rich. But it is a sick perversion of those goals to decide to try to silence everyone else.

If you saw Hitler, would you punch him? To the left, everyone on the right is basically Hitler or some form of Nazi. Either you support Black Lives Matter, or you are a fascist, it's just that black and white (no pun intended).

I'm sure these people think they are doing good, but in reality they are making other people feel unsafe. Am I thinking the right thoughts? Will I be assaulted as a fascist if I think the wrong thing? Will they march down my street destroying property in "protest"?

These clashes with AntiFa (Anti-Fascists) are causing destruction and injury. Just look at Berkeley a few days ago. All the while local colleges and authorities refuse to get involved.

And here is the irony: By their actions, these people are becoming what they hate. Seriously, if you look at r/Anarchy, you would swear it was a fascist board. Think like us, or we will punish you! They don't want government involved in their lives, yet they are practically begging for the national government to declare martial law and/or police action since the local government won't. If this keeps up, the government is going to do it. And the thing is, a LOT of people are going to welcome it with open arms. Because now big government is no longer the enemy, the anarchists are.

Watch soon for police and/or army on every street corner. And watch for people to accept it.

Good job, guys.

__________________
The last time someone slipped viagra in my drink, I found out the hard way.

In my opinion, Brooks is only a conservative in the sense that he claims he is. I certainly don't think he is. In my anecdotal experience, it isn't a generational thing; I've run into many people whom refuse to hear anything outside of their own opinion that are older than me.

College, at least when I attended a few years ago, did not have much in the way of intellectual freedom overall. I did have a few classes that allowed it, but the biases were quite clear. Those professors were certainly not millennials, unlike me.

I think the problem is that the Left, as a generalization, has moved well beyond the little guy, and moved into this weird era in which anything is subjective when they want it to be. Look at the transgender deal; I don't care if a person is transgender, but the idea that I must pretend that a an individual with XY chromosomes and a penis is a woman is more than silly. It's far easier to refute an argument by yelling "bigot!" than actually refuting it, which I've run into this with several Lefties that range from their mid-40s to mid-50s that claim to be moderates.

I largely blame the media, for their horrible reporting. Yet, it's ultimately the fault of the people carrying out such a movement.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anenome

Many cultures of the world marry girls off after their first menses, around 13 years old. I can't say that's inherently immoral, no.

First, for PacerDawn, I'm not going to change your mind even if I am a counterexample to what you already believe, but I think that the overgeneralizations like "To the left, everyone on the right is basically Hitler or some form of Nazi. Either you support Black Lives Matter, or you are a fascist, it's just that black and white" are part of the problem with people drifting towards acting and thinking more stupidly on both sides.

Venom- I agree about Brooks being quasi conservative, and lately he has said some things that defy any categorization aside from bizarre, which is why I put the "?" there. Yes, he and the Times seem to be pretending he is the conservative columnist, but I think they need to do better and find somebody who is articulate, intelligent, and actually a conservative. I'm not sure why they can't do that, but my guess is that the right has better paying gigs for any conservative who can put two sentences together these days. I don't really think Douthat does much better at the Times.

In terms of being transgender, I don't really agree with you that the issue boils down to what one person is or isn't willing to pretend, judge, determine etc about somebody else's gender identity but rather it is about whether we feel that gender identity is up to the individual to determine or society. I'd say that liberals are quick to side with the individual on this point, and there certainly is stigma for transgender people, so perhaps they are the little guy in this scenario. Having said that, where we get into problems is when either or both sides refuse to listen, acknowledge, compromise, accommodate each other specifically when there are differences of opinion. Quick example. I don't know how many school districts my state has, but let's say hypothetically it is 25. When Obama made that statement about all schools having to accommodate transgender students, our Governor- a republican in a red state- made a big deal of opposing it and saying no way. However, 24 of 25 school districts were already in compliance. There was no controversy, there was no need for mandates or protests or any of that. The local communities had already addressed it just to address a problem, but once it was seen as a liberal versus conservative, it became an issue fro protest, offence, resistance, etc. It is absolutely idiotic. I feel like there are many liberals right now who are acting Trump crazy. They just want to be opposing and protesting and resisting the hell out of everything without solving a single problem. I'm absolutely frustrated.

No offense Whimbel but you prove Pacer's point, science and biology be damned, it's all about the feels. Instead of classifying what it actually is, a mental illness. You've proven time and again you completely buy in to group think, and scientific fact only matters when it supports the progressive hive mind. It's the same kind of "science" that has to fudge temperature readings and ignores the earth has naturally occurring warming and cooling cycles to push the progressive agenda. You're part of the problem buddy boy.

First, for PacerDawn, I'm not going to change your mind even if I am a counterexample to what you already believe, but I think that the overgeneralizations like "To the left, everyone on the right is basically Hitler or some form of Nazi. Either you support Black Lives Matter, or you are a fascist, it's just that black and white" are part of the problem with people drifting towards acting and thinking more stupidly on both sides.

You are correct in that it is not everybody on the left, but it does tend to be more on the left these days as you have pointed out. I don't see the right shutting down liberal speakers. There is no middle ground these days. Either we think the group think, or we are on the outside. If you are a counterexample, then I would imagine you are a pariah in your own party.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whimbrel

In terms of being transgender, I don't really agree with you that the issue boils down to what one person is or isn't willing to pretend, judge, determine etc about somebody else's gender identity but rather it is about whether we feel that gender identity is up to the individual to determine or society.

But it is about that. That is why there are schools drafting rules where not referring to someone by their preferred pronouns is considered harassment. If someone identified as "Mary Queen Of Scotts", would you be OK with that and always call them "Sire" and "Your Majesty", which would be their preferred pronouns? Or would you think they were crazy?

Welcome to our world with Transgenders. A man CANNOT be a woman, any more than someone can be Mary Queen of Scotts. Yet here we are being told (in the face of "science") that yes they can. It's surreal...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whimbrel

Having said that, where we get into problems is when either or both sides refuse to listen, acknowledge, compromise, accommodate each other specifically when there are differences of opinion.

I have seen MUCH more lack of compromise come from the left. Like I said, no middle ground here. My middle ground would be that they can call themselves what they want (I won't try and force them otherwise), and I don't have to participate in their fantasy (they won't try and force me otherwise). Yet, that isn't what is happening, is it? Transgenders get to use my bathrooms and I have to participate in their fantasy or else I am a bigot. That's not compromise by any stretch of the imagination.

__________________
The last time someone slipped viagra in my drink, I found out the hard way.

Modern liberalism is a mental disorder that threatens everything that makes America unique and free. The progressive liberal left is no better than the folks in Salem and their 'trials.' They are fundamentalists, fascists, intolerant echo-chamber anti-science idiots who are literally a spreading cancer in society, emanating out of our academies, news media, Hollywood, high tech, and government and NGO groups enforcing group-think and conformity with their standards. They are diseased in their ideology and their attempts to control others.

No offense Whimbel but you prove Pacer's point, science and biology be damned, it's all about the feels. Instead of classifying what it actually is, a mental illness. You've proven time and again you completely buy in to group think, and scientific fact only matters when it supports the progressive hive mind. It's the same kind of "science" that has to fudge temperature readings and ignores the earth has naturally occurring warming and cooling cycles to push the progressive agenda. You're part of the problem buddy boy.

I think it is significant that someone on this forum can write "all x think y" and nobody will call them on it or care. I write that I'm x and don't think y, and your response is not only that I have proven the initial point, but that I am the one espousing group think? Isn't group think when you lose the ability to make objective or critical assessments due to some other factor, like partisanship, or liberal or conservative bias? I would say that your comments make no sense in this regard in that they seem to exemplify what you attribute to me and ignore what was actually expressed.

I'm really not sure what science has to do with this, but since you brought it up, I think your broad generalizations about climate change and mental illness are poorly informed. Gender is far more that an organ, a chromosome, or a feeling. You can decide to define gender however you wish, and I stipulate that good arguments could be made for almost any definition, but to somehow pretend that it is a unidimensional issue seems naive at best. I don't feel that you understand much about the science of global climate change if you think that it does not involve natural temperature fluctuations. One thing I notice is that climate change denial is often focused almost exclusively on temperature and for some reason ignores the chemical changes in our atmosphere. I'm not sure why that is, but I think it has to do with the moronic idea that if global warming exists there would not be cold anywhere on earth at any time. That may sound like an idiotic oversimplification, but it has been used by climate change deniers, instantly demonstrating that they haven't learned much about the science they are judging.

Either way, again, I'm not looking to turn a conservative into a liberal, but some of the things people write here seem at least as close minded as the crazy reactionary shit that took place at the campus in that essay I linked. Look at Terran's post just above this. Nobody sees that it sounds a little extremist and crazy? Which of the adjectives he uses do describe the fanatical, mindless extremism of liberals do not apply equally to his own writing about them? Any? Some? I'm not asking anybody to take my side here, but pretend to respect objectivity or condemn hypocrisy a little?

Welcome to our world with Transgenders. A man CANNOT be a woman, any more than someone can be Mary Queen of Scotts. Yet here we are being told (in the face of "science") that yes they can. It's surreal...

A. I'm not a pariah, but I feel that I am in disagreement with almost everyone. When the Democrats wanted to force McConnell on the SC confirmation, I think only one senator agreed with me that A, it would be hypocritical to bitch and moan about the senate not confirming Obama's pick and then try every trick in the book to block Gorsuch, and B. that it would be a mistake and pointless to trigger a rules change for this nomination. Almost all the other Democratic Senators wanted to go full steam ahead with this manic protest, oppose, resist bullshit. It drives me crazy.

B. Again, whatever the "science" is that you guys are talking about generally and specifically, I guess you will need to spell it out for me because I have absolutely no idea what science you are referring to. The science of transgender identity? Mental Illness? Gender? Public restroom social science? Whichever it is, do you really think - objectively- that the science is unanimously clear on this issue in some way? If so, that would be surprising, since science is rarely unanimous about social issues.

I'm not really sure I understand your take on this. You feel like you are being forced to participate in somebody else's fantasy about something if they use the same restroom you do in public? Do you feel like you should be able to tell other people where to use the bathroom? What fantasy are you participating in and what exactly is happening to you about it?

At one point, people who opposed gay marriage were complaining that their rights to tell other people who they could marry were being overruled. I understand that if somebody was deranged enough to base their whole life on wanting to control somebody else's most personal and intimate decisions that this would seem like a huge deprivation. But for the average person who had no such expectation, this surely was less significant of a loss than if they lost the ability to choose who they married themselves.

Personally, I don't really concern myself with the gender of people using the restroom. I have been in public restrooms that are for both genders, families, one gender, etc. Even with that being my personal stance, is there a problem with providing gender neutral public restrooms for transgender people? Would that still force you into something that you don't like?

Venom- I agree about Brooks being quasi conservative, and lately he has said some things that defy any categorization aside from bizarre, which is why I put the "?" there. Yes, he and the Times seem to be pretending he is the conservative columnist, but I think they need to do better and find somebody who is articulate, intelligent, and actually a conservative. I'm not sure why they can't do that, but my guess is that the right has better paying gigs for any conservative who can put two sentences together these days. I don't really think Douthat does much better at the Times.

I think it's as simple as the NYT being uninterested in having an actual conservative. It seems to work well when they want to paint anyone who isn't in agreement with them as an extremist.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whimbrel

In terms of being transgender, I don't really agree with you that the issue boils down to what one person is or isn't willing to pretend, judge, determine etc about somebody else's gender identity but rather it is about whether we feel that gender identity is up to the individual to determine or society. I'd say that liberals are quick to side with the individual on this point, and there certainly is stigma for transgender people, so perhaps they are the little guy in this scenario. Having said that, where we get into problems is when either or both sides refuse to listen, acknowledge, compromise, accommodate each other specifically when there are differences of opinion. Quick example. I don't know how many school districts my state has, but let's say hypothetically it is 25. When Obama made that statement about all schools having to accommodate transgender students, our Governor- a republican in a red state- made a big deal of opposing it and saying no way. However, 24 of 25 school districts were already in compliance. There was no controversy, there was no need for mandates or protests or any of that. The local communities had already addressed it just to address a problem, but once it was seen as a liberal versus conservative, it became an issue fro protest, offence, resistance, etc. It is absolutely idiotic. I feel like there are many liberals right now who are acting Trump crazy. They just want to be opposing and protesting and resisting the hell out of everything without solving a single problem. I'm absolutely frustrated.

Ultimately, transgenderism is about pretending. The science behind the chromosomes which determine this is far more "settled" than other "settled science" that the Left will not question -- Global Warming Climate Change. Speaking of Climate Change, which there was just a bit march for scientific "facts," many of the people chanting seemed unaware that a perceived consensus, which is usually established by faulty claims, doesn't prove anything in science beyond there being a perceived consensus. Many of those marchers appeared to think that consensus equals fact, when that goes against the very thing they claimed to be marching for.

The transgender piece from Obama did lead to a response, and I could certainly see that appearing to be along party lines. However, without knowing the details of the particular response, was it over transgenders, federal overreach, or a combination? Lets say that 24 of the 25 school districts were already in compliance, if that compliance means that any person, regardless of their chromosomal makeup, can simply declare that they're a woman or a man and the institution must pretend that is true, then that's forcing people to pretend through policy.

Is Caitlin Jenner a man or a woman? Does changing one's name make them a woman? Does getting breast implants (I don't know if he did or not) convert someone? Or, perhaps, getting one's penis lopped off makes them a woman (which, again, I don't know if he did or not)? How is saying Caitlin Jenner is a woman not pretending? I know liberals have been trying to divorce the idea that gender has any objective basis, but that requires trying to change - while insisting it's the same - meaning of gender in modern Western society. With many of the Left wishing to maintain that gender is purely a social construct, how do they possibly square that with different standards based upon gender? I don't see those people rushing to get rid of gender segregated sports, scholarships, and other situations in which it's usually perceived that women would lose as a result.

If a 5ft 8inch woman is 90lbs soaking wet, comes up and tells you she's fat, are you going to pretend she is and recommend that she curb her diet in order to lose weight? What if someone obviously over 30 years old insisted that they're 12 years old, would you pretend they were?

If a person wishes to pretend they're a man or a woman when they're not, that's fine. However, I don't believe pretending that they are actually helps them. I certainly don't want these people bullied, as their suicide rates are astronomical -- I think this whole playing pretend deal not only hurts the individual transgender person and is further causing issues by forcing this view onto children.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whimbrel

Personally, I don't really concern myself with the gender of people using the restroom. I have been in public restrooms that are for both genders, families, one gender, etc. Even with that being my personal stance, is there a problem with providing gender neutral public restrooms for transgender people? Would that still force you into something that you don't like?

Gender neutral restrooms are not the same as saying that a man who claims he is a woman can use a woman-only restroom. If gender is merely a social construct, how can any restroom be gender segregated? How can anything be segregated by gender?

A huge part of the problem for me, as Pacer hit on, was there does not seem to be any compromise from the Left. Looking at another issue, guns in the case, there always seem to be these grand compromises promised; ban the private sale of machine guns after 1986, and we're good on the 2A. Did that happen? No. In fact, many of the same people who made this compromise used that compromise as a means to continue the march down the very same path that they promised was solved -- towards banning more and more firearms, usually due to simply the look of it. With the LGBTQA community, it wasn't long ago that it was essentially sold as "once gay marriage is passed, we're happy." Okay, but did that happen? No. Then it quickly morphed into demanding that people pretend there is no issue with those suffering and believing themselves to be transgender. What seems to have become a grand social experiment, the military, now allows people whom believe they're transgender to join -- knowing that they'll likely elect to receive major surgery which many studies show does little to improve their life -- if not actually further degrading it. How are you going to let someone into the military that has all of the medical issues related to transgenderism, but you won't let other people in with less severe medical issues join?

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anenome

Many cultures of the world marry girls off after their first menses, around 13 years old. I can't say that's inherently immoral, no.

With the LGBTQA community, it wasn't long ago that it was essentially sold as "once gay marriage is passed, we're happy." Okay, but did that happen? No.

Indeed, this is a big issue with gay marriage. The left said all they wanted was gay marriage, and there was no reason to oppose it since it wouldn't affect anyone other than the people involved. What does it matter if two dudes want to marry and a Christian doesn't approve of it? They aren't involving the Christian at all, so why is that person complaining? So the measure passed. Then they decided that "hmm, well, we want a Christian bakery to cater our wedding", which meant Christians actually DID have to get involved with the gay wedding after all, despite what they said prior.

I have always asked those who are for forcing the Christian bakery to cater a gay wedding due to discrimination: Would they be OK forcing a black baker to cater a KKK rally? I still have not gotten a reply to that one.

The left doesn't want liberty. Forcing a person to do something they do not want to do is NOT liberty, it's the exact opposite. No, they actually want totalitarianism enforced by the government. That is extremely scary to me, and should be to anyone.

__________________
The last time someone slipped viagra in my drink, I found out the hard way.

Indeed, this is a big issue with gay marriage. The left said all they wanted was gay marriage, and there was no reason to oppose it since it wouldn't affect anyone other than the people involved. What does it matter if two dudes want to marry and a Christian doesn't approve of it? They aren't involving the Christian at all, so why is that person complaining? So the measure passed. Then they decided that "hmm, well, we want a Christian bakery to cater our wedding", which meant Christians actually DID have to get involved with the gay wedding after all, despite what they said prior.

I have always asked those who are for forcing the Christian bakery to cater a gay wedding due to discrimination: Would they be OK forcing a black baker to cater a KKK rally? I still have not gotten a reply to that one.

The left doesn't want liberty. Forcing a person to do something they do not want to do is NOT liberty, it's the exact opposite. No, they actually want totalitarianism enforced by the government. That is extremely scary to me, and should be to anyone.

I think you're absolutely right, and the jump was instant with that movement.

Also, you may be a bigot if you're not attracted to women with a penis. Cissexist scum!

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anenome

Many cultures of the world marry girls off after their first menses, around 13 years old. I can't say that's inherently immoral, no.

All this stupid ass talk about liberal and conservatives. Le kek. Muh anarchy, muh constitution. All of this is a White mans game that no other race save the Asians can en'mass comprehend in such a way that keeps the peace or foster progress. And by progress i mean trad family, space travel, renewable energy, getting off the growth based economy addiction and actually living a life outside of the rat wheel, social and demographic hegemony. Do you R tards even realize the energy and life spent by Americans partaking in white flight to try to live around their own kind and be safe from dangerous minorities? Its a fucking trillion dollar racket and it destroys families.

You fucking stupid mother fuckers cant seem to get it through your thick skulls that there is only one thing at play here.

Demographics is destiny. Until the larping parasites/enemies running the mid card of our society are put back in the correct pecking order and the people that can maintain this civilization are back in charge the west will continue to slide into oblivion.

But yeah, keep on with your neocon bullshit. The left has beat you at every single issue besides guns for the past 50 years. You goddam losers. You are worthless and at this point the enemy as well.

Debating garbage like this is the reason you are worthless when it comes to politics.

I'd say posts like this illustrate why you're worthless. Period.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackzc

All this stupid ass talk about liberal and conservatives. Le kek. Muh anarchy, muh constitution. All of this talk is a White mans game that no other race save the Asians can en'mass comprehend in such a way that keeps the peace or foster progress. And by progress i mean trad family, space travel, renewable energy, getting off the growth based economy addiction and actually living a life outside of the rat wheel, social and demographic hegemony.

You fucking stupid mother fuckers cant seem to get it through your thick skulls that there is only one thing at play here.

Demographics is destiny. Until the larping parasites/enemies running the mid card of our society are put back in the correct pecking order and the people that can maintain this civilization are back in charge the west will continue to slide into oblivion.

But yeah, keep on with your neocon bullshit. The left has beat you at every single issue besides guns for the past 50 years. You goddam losers. You are worthless and at this point the enemy as well.

Demographics are not destiny, as look at how demographics can shift. If white Americans dominating the U.S. population offered the sort of racial salvation you desire, it would have been achieved.

You didn't reproduce, right? Yet here you are talking about "demographics is destiny" when you did what? Let me put it in terms you may understand: "YouZ don't have no kids, dumbass." You're pretty much a parasite by your own standard; you want to complain about demographics, but you don't - or can't - contribute to the very cause you claim to have a hard-on for. But yeah, keep on with all your talk about white demographics in-between mopping about your life on a message board. Back to your safe space.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anenome

Many cultures of the world marry girls off after their first menses, around 13 years old. I can't say that's inherently immoral, no.

Demographics are not destiny, as look at how demographics can shift. If white Americans dominating the U.S. population offered the sort of racial salvation you desire, it would have been achieved.

You didn't reproduce, right? Yet here you are talking about "demographics is destiny" when you did what? Let me put it in terms you may understand: "YouZ don't have no kids, dumbass." You're pretty much a parasite by your own standard; you want to complain about demographics, but you don't - or can't - contribute to the very cause you claim to have a hard-on for. But yeah, keep on with all your talk about white demographics in-between mopping about your life on a message board. Back to your safe space.

Herpa Derpa Filter.

Your shits all messed up. Back to your cuckshed Johnny American! Buy more guns and store them in your cuckshed! That'll show em!

Them damned ol liberals, dont they know that a man is not supposed ta lay with another man? I aint no rascist, but that just aint rite! Dont tread on me daag nabbit! These colors dont run!

Hitler didn't have kids and neither did Jesus. But please, go on about its the only thing that matters. I've red pilled many many people and got them second guessing the destructive ideas that you cling to. And get ready old man, your kids are going to see you for the fraud you are. They will be closer politically to me than they will be you.

Bank on it.

__________________
Nintendo: A guiding light in a sea of video game degeneracy

Hey dumbass, YOU are the one going on about demographics. So WHAT THE HELL have you done about it? EH?

I have six kids, you parasitical little POS. Six kids, the oldest of whom just scored a 33 on the ACT (can you count that high?) and for whom I've never received a dime of public assistance. Got children? Done anything about America's demographics?

You're worse than useless. You're a dead branch of the DNA tree. You're not only racist, you're incapable of helping your own race when you say it's all that matters, lol.

Hey dumbass, YOU are the one going on about demographics. So WHAT THE HELL have you done about it? EH?

I have six kids, you parasitical little POS. Six kids, the oldest of whom just scored a 33 on the ACT (can you count that high?) and for whom I've never received a dime of public assistance. Got children? Done anything about America's demographics?

You're worse than useless. You're a dead branch of the DNA tree. You're not only racist, you're incapable of helping your own race when you say it's all that matters, lol.

You fucking numpty. I never once said everyone that is white needs to go out and have a bunch of fucking kids just because. You cant outbreed 30 million mexicans that have little to no standard of living nor have any shame about mooching off the fucking government. They will breed the country broke soon. Now tell me what good is me having 5 kids going to do. What do i need 5 for? I don't have a fucking farm. You fix the demographics by deporting them...

This isn't a numbers game where who has more wins. White Americans and Europeans along with the Japanese progressed. We are entering a post industrial world and less people are required. This is fine, but the elites don't want this to happen as it would contract the global economy.

You seems to only care about your filthy brood and your family tree. I care about whats best for everyone. I can just as easily call you the parasite queer bait. That shit goes both ways.

Im not only a racist? LOL! Dude, get the fuck outta here with that mess. Tell someone who cares. Liberal scumbag.

__________________
Nintendo: A guiding light in a sea of video game degeneracy