What Midterm Elections Mean for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Investors

In less than eight months from now, voters will head to the polls for the 2014 midterm elections. The results of this election will help shape U.S. policies for at least the next couple years, and looking at recent polls, this election is a dead heat.

Few investors have more to gain or lose from this election than those of Fannie Mae (NASDAQOTCBB: FNMA) and Freddie Mac (NASDAQOTCBB: FMCC) . With this in mind, it's time to evaluate a few election scenarios and their effects on these companies.

What we knowNo matter your political opinions on President Obama, he's sticking around through the 2014 midterms since he's not up for election. Obama's position favors a wind-down of Fannie and Freddie and their replacement by a new government entity to provide insurance to residential mortgages.

He has noted his support for the Corker-Warner bill, which is nearly identical to the latest Johnson-Crapo proposal, and has also noted an intention to replace the GSEs as part of housing reform. If a bill like this came to his desk, it would be expected to receive the chief executive's signature, thereby dealing a major setback to Fannie and Freddie shareholders.

But to get a piece of legislation to Obama's desk, it will first need to pass both houses of Congress, and that's why the midterm elections matter.

Scenario: Democratic Senate, Republican HouseThis scenario has a fairly good chance of happening based on current polls and results from past elections. A Washington Post/ABC News poll gave the democratic candidate a 1% advantage in the generic House and Senate races; an amount well within the margin of error signaling a close race.

In 2012, Congressional district boundaries gave republicans the edge in the House where the GOP retained control despite democrats getting more than one million more combined votes in House elections. So with the Senate race so close and republicans holding the advantage in House elections based on districts, a democratic senate and republican house is one of the most likely scenarios.

With this outcome, political alignments would be very similar to present ones. Legislation similar to the Johnson-Crapo proposal would have a reasonable chance of passing the Senate with bipartisan support, but it would find House support difficult as House republicans are opposed to such a government role in housing.

Since housing reform legislation would need passage of both the Senate and House, a democratic senate and republican house looks to keep housing reform gridlocked for the near term.

Scenario: Republican Senate, Republican HouseThis is another one of the most likely scenarios. As mentioned in the last scenario, district alignments give republicans the edge for retaining control of the House while the Senate remains a dead heat.

If republicans can take the senate, legislation like the Johnson-Crapo proposal could become even more difficult to pass since the proposal is centered on the creation of a federal housing entity -- an idea opposed by most republicans.

With the House and Senate both under republican control, there is a possibility Congress could send a bill to the president. However, republican positions on housing reform have major differences from the president's own position, and a republican-written bill would have little chance of obtaining Obama's signature.

This situation likely produces more delay for any wind-down of Fannie and Freddie and, like the first scenario, gives the courts more time to weigh in on the future of the GSE investors.

Scenario: Republican Senate, Democratic HouseThis scenario seems far less likely since it would require the democrats to lose the race seen as closer and win the one that's more of an uphill battle. But even if it did happen, the divided government here would make passage of a housing reform bill difficult.

The only way a housing reform bill passing in this situation is with a slim republican Senate majority that creates a largely bipartisan bill that can also win over democrats in the House. However, this election scenario is unlikely, and even if it did happen, gridlock could still have a good chance.

Scenario: Democratic Senate, Democratic HousePast trends make this scenario seem less likely as the party controlling the executive usually has a disadvantage in midterm elections. But with a sweep by the democrats, Fannie and Freddie investors could come under threat.

If bipartisan legislation similar to the Johnson-Crapo proposal can pass the Senate, the House would not have the same principled objection to such a federal role in the housing market. And with support of the ideas behind Johnson-Crapo indicated by Obama, this bill could get Congressional and presidential approval.

But with the current polls showing such a close race, the democrats would have to pull ahead and buck historical trends for this to happen. With so much time between now and election day, I won't rule this scenario out, but I wouldn't count on it either.

Investing in gridlockBlame whoever you want for Congressional gridlock, but one key beneficiary of the disagreement are investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. For over five years, these investors have watched as the GSEs have changed from cash burners to cash cows.

Now with lawsuits to return Fannie and Freddie to their investors making their way through the courts, the best things GSE investors can hope for is more gridlock in the years ahead. And looking at the most likely outcomes from the 2014 midterm elections, gridlock may very well continue to be the name of the game.

Three American companies growing even with political gridlockPolitical gridlock is hurting many industries and has even threatened the credit rating on the national debt. But one industry is powering through the gridlock and could produce big profits for its investors. For this reason, the Motley Fool is offering a comprehensive look at three energy companies set to soar during this transformation in the energy industry. To find out which three companies are spreading their wings, check out the special free report, "3 Stocks for the American Energy Bonanza." Don't miss out on this timely opportunity; click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free.

Alexander MacLennan owns common shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This article is not an endorsement to buy or sell any security and does not constitute professional investment advice. Always do your own due diligence before buying or selling any security. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Actually, the alignment of districts is very important to analyzing the midterm elections from an investment perspective. The poll being used to gauge current voter opinions is a generic ballot rather than one broken down by district.

Since the district alignments resulted in republican control of the House despite a greater number of votes for democratic representatives, we have to assume that an equal number of votes for democrats and republicans would lead to republican control of the House (all else being equal).

Personally, I am against any gerrymandering of districts by either political party and would favor reforms that have neutral groups set district boundaries. But to run a more complete analysis of the midterm elections from an investment perspective, all available information must be factored in.