Lindsay McLaren, the researcher with the University of Calgary’s Cumming School of Medicine who led the study, told the Calgary Eyeopener‘s David Gray that there were more cavities in both Calgary and Edmonton over the period of the study, but “it got worse in Calgary, where fluoridation was stopped, than in Edmonton.”

McLaren said the study is clear about the cause and effect at play.

“We designed the study so we could be as sure as possible that [the increased tooth decay] was due to [fluoride] cessation rather than due to other factors,” she told the CBC.

“We systematically considered a number of other factors … and in the end, everything pointed to fluoridation cessation being the most important factor.”

Note from Fluoride Action Network:We found that the Calgary fluoride study by McLaren et al. fatally flawed as key data was omitted. Sadly, the Canadian press has failed to report this. Read more here

Fluoridation decided by municipality

Health Canada notes that provincial and territorial governments regulate the quality of drinking water in their jurisdictions, with the fluoridation of drinking water supplies decided by each municipality, in collaboration with the province or territory and possibly in consultation with residents.

“This is a relatively new finding, so we are going to take a look at the report and go from there with an evidence-based decision,” she said.

The controversial issue has been debated in Calgary for years. Fluoride has both beneficial effects in “reducing the incidence of dental caries” and negative effects “in causing enamel and skeletal fluorosis following prolonged high exposure,” according to the World Health Organization. In the case of fluorosis, the teeth can become permanently discoloured, and accumulation of fluoride in the bones and joints can damage them and cause pain.

Denise Kokaram, of the Alex Dental Health Bus, says water fluoridation is the cheapest, most economical way to protect dental health in children — especially for families who can’t afford dental care.

“It’s not unusual for us to see a child with almost full-mouth decay in the population that we’re looking at, and considering that we’re in Calgary, we shouldn’t be seeing that degree of disease here and we are,” she said.

“And to think of that rising, and those children suffering and in even more pain, when it’s such an easy thing to remedy to remedy or at least assist with.”

Kokaram says of the 1,700 children and youth the Alex treated last year, about 50 per cent had tooth decay. It’s continuing to collect its own statistics to track the decay rate among its clients.

Meagan Heck, head of the Calgary Dental Assistants Association and who also works in a dentist’s office, says she`s not surprised by the findings of the study.

“We’re definitely busy with the kids, and what we’re seeing is that kids who get cavities, if they don’t come in frequently to the offices, we don’t catch them soon enough, so without fluoridation the cavities get larger really quickly,” she said.

“And kids don’t brush their teeth regularly as it is. They have a high sugary diet.”

Why Calgary stopped

Calgary’s city council voted 10-3 in 2011 to stop adding fluoride to the drinking water.

Ward 7 Coun. Druh Farrell was one of those in favour of removing it, arguing that helping families who couldn’t afford fluoridated toothpaste would be a better idea than giving it to the entire population.

Ward 3 Coun. Jim Stevenson also voted to remove fluoride from Calgary’s water, saying there was insufficient medical proof that keeping it would have any benefit.

“We as a council have to show some leadership here,” he told the CBC in 2011.

“I would really question our right to put [fluoride] in, but … I don’t question at all our right to remove it.”

One of the arguments in favour of fluoride removal was its availability in sources other than drinking water, such as toothpaste.

McLaren said fluoride given by dentists is one source, but not everybody has access to such care.

“Our findings, and others, suggest that community fluoridation continues to have an effect above and beyond these other sources of fluoride,” she said.

McLaren said the tooth decay increase found in her study is more significant in children’s baby teeth than in adult teeth, and she added there is a need to continue to monitor the trend.

Fluoride removal a cost decision: councillor

Ward 9 Coun. Gian-Carlo Carra was another one of the majority on council who voted to stop adding fluoride to the water. He welcomes the new study.

“I’m glad we’re getting some localized and pretty clear science pointing to the fact that community fluoridation actually has an effect,” he told the CBC.

“I would say that when we made the decision, that information was not as cut and dry.”

Carra said at the time of the 2011 vote, council faced a cost of about $10 million to upgrade the city’s fluoride injection system, plus an ongoing maintenance cost of $1 million annually.

“The conversation we were having with the province was that fluoridation is a public health issue…. I, at least, and several of the deciding votes on council would be very happy to continue fluoridation if the province was going to pony up and cover its costs in terms of public health.”

Carra told the CBC that if the decision were in front of council today with the new data, he would advocate for fluoridating Calgary’s drinking water — with the province paying the cost.