February 7 (Part Tahi)

– the beginning of public reaction and action against the planned partial state-asset sales…

A small group assembled at the front of the Art Gallery in Wellington’s Civic Square. Though raining, the group was in high spirits, and it was pointed out – quite rightly – that we were representing 80% of the country who opposed state asset sales,

And we were off, with Jonathan being interviewed by the Radio NZ journo,

.

.

.

A simple message, to respect and honour the Treaty, via Section 9 of the State Owned Enterprises Act 1986. Section 9 is not a particularly complicated or onerous piece of legislation,

.

.

In fact, the Treaty may save our state assets from being flogged of.

“Ordinary” New Zealanders, marching along Mercer St, Willis St, and along Lambton Quay. The slogans were simple; “No asset sales!”. As the rally moved along the streets, more people joined us,

.

.

Kay Gubbins was quite clear in pushing the message,

.

.

Did Wellington’s most ardent and well-recognised street evangelist, exhort John Key to repent and cancel the planned asset sales?

.

.

The media, recording the march,

.

.

Past Bowen House – good kiwi folk making their way to Parliament. Whilst Wellingtonians looked-on , there were no hecklers. Those watching understood what we were on about,

.

.

.

.

.

.

And through the gates of Parliament – the People’s House of Representatives. (Ok, just kidding. Currently occupied by National, ACT, United Future, and various moneyed vested-interests, and assorted right wing ‘groupies’.)

.

.

.

… and joining another group already in the grounds,

.

.

Note “Mad Hatter” – who convened the rally – covered in mock-oil. on the far left of the pic below. More on her later,

.

.

I moved away, past the barriers; around a low-stone wall; onto the higher part of the grounds, to take better pictures of the assembled protesters,

.

.

Where I encountered a somewhat over-zealous security guard who tried to remove me from the higher ground,

.

.

He was persistant. I was insistant. We had a “frank exchange of views“. All of which attracted (predictably enough) the attention of the media,