PC Garbage

06/30/2013

We have entered a brave new world ... or perhaps "The Twilight Zone." It is clear that what once passed for understanding of natural behavior and human reproduction are outdated. We should embrace the trends and "lean forward" toward a more tolerant future. We can follow the brilliant leadership of world traveller Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mmm), The Supreme Court, GLAAD, MSNBC, and enlightened progressives everywhere to discover the future of sexual norms.

Common Core has a tough task ahead. How will it be able to mold (in this case, actually make moldy) young minds while balancing science and politically correct trendiness? Will it be flexible and be able to keep up with trends in indoctrination and changing sets of "facts?" It will take a special person to shape and update the Common Core Sex Ed standards as different sets of political victim groups go in and out of fashion. Is former Obama Safe Fisting Czar Kevin Jennings available?

05/22/2010

I think we can all agree that in this modern and enlightened society, birth control is a "human right". As with anything that can be called a "human right", birth control must be available free of charge to those who might wish to exercise their "human right". Of course, being enlightened and progrethive (progressive with a lisp), we must ignore the sticky point regarding the infringement on the rights of those forced to provide for the "human rights" of the recipient. We are fortunate to live in such an era, when the provider can be so easily vilified so as to prevent the recipient from feeling like a burden. It would be awful for the recipient to be alerted the incredible ridiculousness of demanding not only freebies... but freebies of only the best quality. I suppose these are the days of the welfare snob.

Washington D.C., the model of everything our society should be, is stepping up to provide nothing but the best when it comes to taxpayer funded battle against morality. The Washington Post has the scoop:

11/30/2009

Sarah Palin made the mistake of being a self-made woman who actually accomplished things in her own right instead of riding her husband’s coattails.She worked next to her husband founding and managing a small business that continues to flourish.She was active in local school and community affairs.She ran for local office serving as a council person and eventually mayor of Wasilla, Alaska.She took on several positions in the state government. She resigned a high office to battle the insiders who had run the state for years. Elected Governor she was soon the most popular governor in America.She accomplished all this without using a family fortune, marrying for money or buying her way into prominence.She achieved position and influence the old fashioned way, she earned it.

Instead of being the cause for celebration among liberals this classic American story of self-improvement and success inspired them to seek the destruction of Governor Palin and her family.Liberal news organizations sent numerous reporters to dig for dirty gold in Alaska while sending no reporters to investigate the Democrat Vice-Presidential candidate.These instigations spawned so many frivolous lawsuits the Governor cited the desire to save Alaska the money wasted investigating these suits as one of the substantial reasons for her resignation.Since then the liberal media has taken every opportunity to malign her and her family.Today the AP alone has assigned eleven reporters to fact-check her new book.They assigned none to fact check Hillary’s.The slander on the left has poured like a torrent over Sarah Palin and her family, maligning her faith, her service, her personal life, her intelligence and all because she dares to be a successful woman who doesn’t toe the liberal party-line.

11/08/2009

This is not intended to paint the entire generation that followed the "Greatest Generation" with the same red brush. There are certainly patriotic citizens and those who cherish the liberty our founders established among the offspring of the generation who fought World War II. I am related by blood and by marriage to such patriotic children of the "Greatest Generation".

This is about the groovy hippies who never grew out of that phase. This is about the "peace" and "love" types like Bill Ayers who likely mentored Barack Obama more than he would ever admit to the voting public. This is about those who were born in the forties and went from the university to law school to Congress and soaked up all the Marxist ideology they could along the way. This is about those who went from hippy to Congressional intestinal worm and have infested the Capitol for decades. This is about the likes of George Miller (Dimocrat CA-7), who has been in the House since he was twenty-nine years old in 1974. Thank God all of California isn't the same as San Francisco (of course I thank God all of Illinois isn't the same as Chicago too). It is too bad California doesn't have more representatives like the elder and younger Duncan Hunter!

10/18/2009

Following the recent pander-fest at which "Big Brother" Barry proclaimed his intention to repeal "don't ask, don't tell." I was left thinking about logistical issues that obviously don't bear consideration by the eloquent reader. Who has time to consider logistics or even the plight of our servicemen and women in Afghanistan when there is a voting block to appease?

I recall April 1989, when I arrived at NTC Orlando for basic training. The men and the women were segregated. I assume there are reasons that men and women do not bunk together in the service and I further assume that sexuality is at least part of those reasons. Have they changed the shower rooms since 1989? When I was in basic training, the shower room was one open room with several shower heads. The men and women did not shower together... once again, I assume sexuality played a role in the set-up of the system.

How will the introduction of openly gay members into the military be handled? Will there be separate companies in basic training for the openly gay? Will they be given private bunk areas? Will they shower at separate times or will the bases and training centers be required to install private showers? The only alternative to these measures would seem to be servicemen and women subjected to showering with open homosexuals. I know the PC police will say it makes no difference if a group of men have to shower with a homosexual (same applies with the women), but I have to ask how it would be different than having straight men and women shower together?

08/14/2009

Apparently the use of the two word combination "death panel" by some who don't see the necessity in "moderating" or PC-baloneying the possible repercussions of Obamacare is taken very seriously by President Obama's appendages such as The New York Times. The screeching libs and their "moderate" enablers would have the public believe that to say "death panels" are a concern is the same as saying the president's plan (currently HR 3200 is all we have to go by) specifically uses that terminology. The NY Slimes would have the public discard common sense because references to logical consequences of proposed legislative intrusions do not read the legalize wording verbatim. So if someone such as the threat to the left, Sarah Palin mentions "death panels", she and anyone who shares her concern are to be disregarded based on the fact that the assessment was not a direct quote.

It is odd that the president's personal press would take issue with assessments of the bill that do not consist of direct quotes, unless they simply take issue with assessments of "Big Brother" Barry's bill, since it has been pointed out that the bill's language cannot even be comprehended by the generators of the bill. Is this not what Monica "I can be bribed" Conyers' hubby John said at a Press Club event? Apparently members of the House of Representatives (who generated the bill) cannot be expected to read the bill unless they had "two days and two lawyers" to understand what it says. Given the complicated nature of the bill (or the seventh grade reading level of some in Congress), is it any wonder that expressions of concern about the bill would not necessarily consist of direct quotes from its sections?

07/13/2009

I fear that the transgendered community is receiving unfair neglect in the identity politics lottery that is the Obama nominating policy. I believe a wise transgenda with the richness of... his and her experiences would make better judgments than someone (particularly a white person without gender confusion) who has not had those experiences.

Who would better empathize with the litigious cross-dressing male who decides to sue an OB-GYN for discrimination because he cannot have a baby? Empathy is, after all, a requirement for a justice appointed by the current reader of TOTUS. In fact empathy is third on the priority list, following only identity and propensity for wealth redistribution.

05/08/2009

I ask a question in the title of this post, which can be answered with one word. The word is "everything!"

I was trying to think of some issue that liberals would gladly leave off the federal behemoth's "to dominate" list and came up empty. Even when sneaky liberals pretend to be for choice or individual freedom, they want government interference. One need look no further than the left's perceived right to slaughter the unborn for a prime example. The vile libs demand that a flawed Supreme Court decision trump all state and local decisions that might limit the brutality known as abortion. Roe v. Wade is used as a weapon to defend this "right" from laws that might prevent statutory rapists from taking their prey to abortion mills to destroy the evidence or perhaps give potential abortion recipients information (sonograms.)

One week ago, the House passed H.R. 1913, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, by a vote of 249 to 175 (Roll Call 223).
The bill has now moved to the Senate for consideration. Although the
Senate has not yet taken any action on either H.R. 1913 or its Senate
counterpart, S. 909,
it is important to continue educating your Senators on this vitally
important issue. Eagle Forum encourages you to pre-emptively urge your
Senators to oppose any efforts to further advance hate crimes
legislation.

Sponsored by Rep. John Conyers
(D-MI) and Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA), H.R. 1913 and S. 909 will make a
hate crime -- a crime in which the victim is intentionally selected
based on his or her race, religion, ethnicity, gender, etc. -- a
federal offense.

The bills seek to accomplish this by mandating federal criminal prosecution for state offenses, with the possibility of life imprisonment, for crimes motivated by the "actual or perceived
race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation,
gender identity, or disability of any person." H.R. 1913/S. 909 will
also establish homosexual and transgender persons as a protected class
of victims by adding the words "sexual orientation" and "gender
identity" to Title 18 of the U.S.
criminal code.

Make no mistake,
these bills are dangerous and unprecedented proposals which will
transform the criminal justice system and threaten religious liberty by:

Violating the First Amendment by infringing upon the constitutional guarantees of religious expression and freedom of speech.

Violating the Fourteenth Amendment by deliberately compromising the principle of equal protection under the law for all Americans.

Seeking to silence and punish all opposing viewpoints.

Targeting those who hold traditional beliefs on homosexuality.

Granting more government protection to certain classes of people, particularly, homosexuals.

A typical tactic of the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender) groups is to distort and exaggerate FBI statistics
to their benefit. In 2007, there were 1,521 victims of "sexual
orientation" bias, however, 335 of these were incidents of
"intimidation," also known as shouting or name-calling. 448 of these
crimes were "simple assault," defined as pushing or shoving without
physical injury, with 242 of the crimes being aggravated assault,
defined as bodily harm. So, in a nation with 300 million people, there
were only 242 "violent" crimes committed against
homosexuals, bisexuals, or drag queens in 2007.

In fact, in analyzing FBI statistics
even further, it is clear that violence as a result of anti-religious
bias and racial bias occurs more frequently than sexual orientation
bias. Compared to the 1,521 bias crimes against LGBT individuals,
4,956 racial incidents occurred in 2007 -- 908 were anti-white; 3,424
were anti-African American; and the rest were bias crimes against other
races. Out of 1,628 anti-religious crimes, 1,127 were against Jewish
people; 142 against Muslims; 70 against Catholics; 67 against
Protestants; and the rest against other religions.

Not only are H.R. 1913 and S. 909
unconstitutional, it they are also unnecessary. The underlying
offense, whether it is murder, assault, or any other crime, is already
fully and aggressively prosecuted in all 50 states. We do not need a
new law; rather, we need strict enforcement of existing laws.
All violent crimes are hate crimes and all violent criminals should be
severely punished. Elevating particular groups of victims above others
and awarding them a special status is not the answer to decreasing
crime in America.

TAKE ACTION!

Please continue calling,
emailing, and faxing your Senators, and tell them you expect them to
oppose any hate crimes legislation that may come up for a vote in the
Senate.