The issue is The United States Constitution but, don't let that get in the way, because as Gabriel Malor states over at Ace of Spades: (there is precedent)

[...] Is the case going to get anywhere? Doubtful. They let William Saxbe get away with it in the 1970s, so there's precedent. Also, who has standing? As with the Obama Birther lawsuits, it's difficult to find someone who has suffered injury to a protected interest. [...]

So, because something was done unconstitutionally and illegally before, it is OK to do it again? That kind of round-robin buffoonery is what has gone wrong in this Nation. The attitude now is, "Hey. We did it before so it is OK to do it now." I'll remember that when I get my next speeding ticket. All I need to do is go to court and say, "Hey. I was speeding last week and it was fine. What's the difference?"

You are free to share, to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix, to adapt the work under the following conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.
''