Seems reasonable. Is there some reason that values like, "5.1.0",
"5.1.2" would be more problematic to constrain than "elephant",
"kangaroo", etc.?
Lou a écrit :
> Any thoughts on this one? I am minded to change the datatype to
> data.enumerated (though that leaves open the question of how to specify
> a closed set of numeric values)
>
--
Dr Gabriel BODARD
(Epigrapher & Digital Classicist)
Centre for Computing in the Humanities
King's College London
26-29 Drury Lane
London WC2B 5RL
Email: gabriel.bodard at kcl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)20 7848 1388
Fax: +44 (0)20 7848 2980
http://www.digitalclassicist.org/http://www.currentepigraphy.org/