Now take a look at the following image. It shows a McDonnell Douglas MD-11 which is a tri-engined airliner as used by UPS (Flight 902). Look at the
size of the contrail that the MD-11 is producing. Compare it to the above image and the video? Tri-engined airliners such as the MD-11 have caused all
manner of excitement and confusion within the conspiracy community.

Some of them are completely baffled because obviously they will produce a third contrail. Under certain conditions as you can see in the following
image the contrails will blend and mix. Now consider that the news cameraman has zoomed in as far as he can go? He is using high power optics and
still can't get a close up of the 'object'. It show you how far away this 'object' was. Also consider that the MD-11 was up at 39,000 feet?

I'll fight you tooth and nail until I'm proven wrong. And when your proven right, I'll have your back, and fight with you tooth and nail.
Go there and learn the truth.
That's my official opinion.
Violater1 out.

Originally posted by Violater1
I can't take credit for this work.
This was done by Uncinus at contrailscience.com...

I'll fight you tooth and nail until I'm proven wrong. And when your proven right, I'll have your back, and fight with you tooth and nail.
Go there and learn the truth.
That's my official opinion.
Well you know what?
You just posted the proof that Richard Warren's Pics are fake.....
In every pic, but the second one down is the most obvious, you see the EXACT same cloud infront of that contrail as you do in the chopper still pic on
that site you linked.....

The only way that could be is if Gil's Helicopter in on Richard's balcony!!!!!

Yes, just helping you make the point. Someone will probably jump on it anyway. There was once a thread here where someone claimed that LA stations
were showing tapes of the World Trade Center attacks three hours before they happened, using the timestamp of the broadvast as "proof."

No.
The Navy says no such thing. The "evidence" presented is the standing Notice to Mariners for the region.

edit on 11/17/2010 by Phage because: (no reason given)

I posted this 'notice' a while ago but just thought I'd re-post it seeing someone else made a thread about it.

No, what? The Navy didn't say this? So now this 'notice' is wrong too?
Man Phage, you just never ever concede. In fact, the more you defend (even erroneously now) the more of a undeniable debunker you look like (I still
like you though

It says:
1.INTERMITTENT MISSILE FIRING OPERATIONS0001Z TO 2359Z
DAILY MONDAY THRU SUNDAY IN THE NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER
SEA RANGE. THE MAJORITY OF MISSILE FIRINGS TAKE PLACE
1400Z TO 2359Z AND 0001Z TO 0200Z DAILY MONDAY THRU FRIDAY
IN AREA BOUND BY

It's not (nor is the title thread) saying what we saw on Nov 8th at around 5PM was definitely theirs but it certainly lends a lot more credence to
this being a missile than a plane that no one has yet to identify.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.