Comments on: What Do You Think Ogopogo Is? https://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/what-do-you-think-ogopogo-is/
for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and MoreTue, 05 Aug 2014 15:10:47 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2
By: LordBalto https://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/what-do-you-think-ogopogo-is/comment-page-1/#comment-98185
Fri, 08 Aug 2014 03:57:19 +0000https://cryptomundo.com/?p=77201#comment-98185One of those films looks to me like a string of floating rubber tires. They apparently had trouble keeping them all vertical. And the ones where the humps are sticking up high above the water just don’t look natural to me. The real snakes I’ve seen undulate sideways. They don’t move up and down like the hammers on a piano. Keep in mind that photo manipulation didn’t begin with PhotoShop. It’s been around for over a century.
]]>
By: dconstrukt https://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/what-do-you-think-ogopogo-is/comment-page-1/#comment-98159
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 15:10:47 +0000https://cryptomundo.com/?p=77201#comment-98159good discussion…

this is what i’m saying… there has to be some reason why people claim to see something unusual in lakes… maybe it’s the geography (steep slopes)? and boating waves?

i dunno.

i mean ppl have said to see it before there were motor boats… so there goes that idea…

]]>
By: cryptokellie https://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/what-do-you-think-ogopogo-is/comment-page-1/#comment-98134
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 22:04:09 +0000https://cryptomundo.com/?p=77201#comment-98134Aside from the Folden Film which is interesting but inconclusive, there isn’t very much real tangible evidence for the Ogopogo…as much as I would sincerely like there to be. I’ve been waiting over 50+ years for this one too. Well, those who wait also serve as the saying goes, I suppose
]]>
By: PhotoExpert https://cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/what-do-you-think-ogopogo-is/comment-page-1/#comment-98132
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 20:04:02 +0000https://cryptomundo.com/?p=77201#comment-98132Well, good question! What I think it is, is primarily based on the evidence that I have seen to date. Rule out out obvious fakes, hoaxes and intentional digital manipulation, that leaves us with some evidence. I would say the vast majority of evidence I have seen falls into this category.

We can further shave down that evidence by applying the scientific method and deduce what it could not be. I doubt a reptile, even one that hibernates could survive the cold of winter in that geographic location. We can eliminate other possibilities by deduction. Through process of deduction, this eliminates even more of the evidence.

Then we must further consider mistaken identities of natural phenomenon such as waves, discarded tires, logs, or waste. This applies to most of the photos and videos I have seen. Which now leaves us with just a handful of videos for evidential evaluation.

Of these, some are misidentified living creatures such as schools of fish, sturgeon, otters, etc.

Ruling out this evidence only leaves us with a couple of questionable photos and video. The problem in identifying what creature or creatures are seen in these videos is that most of the creature(s) are submerged. So we do not get a total picture of what Ogopogo is or is not. This is called inconclusibe evidence.

So I can not say what Ogopogo is or is not. My theory is based on evidence I have seen. And from what I have seen, Ogopogo is a misidentification of a known species of animal.

Isn’t the human imagination remarkable? I am not saying Ogopogo is not a yet unidentified creature. There is just not enough credible evidence to make a declaration like that!