xymphora

Saturday, May 25, 2019

"Jared Kushner is surprised he can’t get Palestinian Businessmen on Board with Promises of Prosperity" (Cole):

"The Palestinians know their own history and they know that the post-WW I
Versailles peace conference and then the British empire itself promised
them a Palestinian state (the latter by 1949). While Jewish
nationalists or Zionists make a big deal out of the 1917 Balfour
Declaration, it says nothing about erecting a state in Palestine, and
League of Nations deliberations repeatedly scolded the British for ignoring the national development of the indigenous Palestinians,
the primary function of a Class A Mandate like Palestine. Palestinians
are a people as Syrians and Iraqis are a people, and all were promised a
state by the League of Nations. Only Palestinians did not get one.
They won’t rest until they have a passport."

I know they will roll out the OPCW again the next time they need PR, but it now has zero credibility: "The Western Media is Key to Syria Deception" (Cook):

"The leaked document is deeply troubling for two reasons.
First, the assessment, based on the available technical data,
contradicts the conclusion of the final OPCW report that the two
chemical cylinders were dropped from the air and crashed through
building roofs. It argues instead that the cylinders were more likely
placed at the locations they were found.
If that is right, the most probable explanation is that the cylinders
were put there by al-Qaeda groups – presumably in a last desperate
effort to persuade the west to intervene and to prevent the jihadists
being driven out of Douma.
But even more shocking is the fact that the expert assessment based
on the data collected by the OPCW team is entirely unaddressed in the
OPCW’s final report.
It is not that the final report discounts or rebuts the findings of
its own experts. It simply ignores those findings; it pretends they
don’t exist. The report blacks them out, erases them from the official
record. In short, it perpetrates a massive deception."

and:

"This week the same al-Qaeda groups that were present in Douma – and
may have staged that lethal attack – claimed that the Syrian government
had again launched chemical weapons against them, this time on their
final holdout in Idlib.
A responsible media, a media interested in the facts, in evidence, in
truth-telling, in holding the powerful to account, would be duty bound
to frame this latest, unsubstantiated claim in the context of the new
doubts raised about the OPCW report into last year’s chemical attack
blamed on Assad.
Given that the technical data suggest that al-Qaeda groups, and the
White Helmets who work closely with them, were responsible for staging
the attack – even possibly of murdering civilians to make the attack
look more persuasive – the corporate media had a professional and moral
obligation to raise the matter of the leaked document.
It is vital context as anyone tries to weigh up whether the latest
al-Qaeda claims are likely to be true. To deprive readers of this
information, this essential context would be to take a side, to
propagandise on behalf not only of western governments but of al-Qaeda
too.
And that is exactly what the corporate media have just done. All of them."

Then some funny stuff about the liars at the Guardian reporting on France and the US saying nice things about the OPCW, without the context that the OPCW has just been caught lying, leaving the reader wondering what the hell is going on. Cook finishes with some of the 'wars for oil' bloviation that respectable people use in lieu of mentioning the dreaded JQ!

"The “freedom and democracy” brought to #Libya
by “liberators” Obama, Hillary, Cameron and Sarkozy turned a once
stable state into a hellhole of roving jihadists still ravaged by war
today.
And they wonder why we oppose US regime change war designs against #Venezuela & #Iran? "

"'Troops To Iran' Scare - The Mountain Brings Forth A Mouse" (Moon). Given the number of American troops, mercs, and spies sloshing around the world, the new troops to the Middle East to supposedly look after (!) the ones already around Iran is just a rounding error. They probably lose track of this many troops every week! This is a good thing, as it appears to represent Trump's moderation of the crazies he has around him.

Friday, May 24, 2019

"Trump tactics echo Venezuela’s populist Maduro and put Canada at risk, says former diplomat" (Grauer). Dafuq did I just read. Maduro's anti-democratic tendencies are influencing Trump, and Canada is in danger of being led down the same path by Trump? Wow! No wonder Canada has to get rid of Maduro. This is from a senior Canadian diplomat:

"Over a 25-year career, Rowswell served with the United Nations in Somalia, as Canada’s first diplomatic envoy to Baghdad after the fall of Saddam Hussein, with NATO in Kandahar during Canada’s involvement in Afghanistan and as an adviser on international strategy in the Privy Council Office under Jean Chrétien and Stephen Harper."

You get a glimpse of the enormity of the deep problem facing Canada, when this is the level of analysis. You don't like to think that your government is made up of literal monsters, but it is difficult to get around the facts.

Background on Rowswell's dirty meddling in Venezuela as lap-dog to the Venezuelan 1%: "Canada’s Meddling in Venezuela" (Engler).

Canadian diplomats, though they got no credit for it, put together the cluster bomb ban. You have to wonder how the decent people in Canadian Foreign Affairs think about this massive moral deterioration.

"What a crazy world we live in. #JulianAssange faces up to 170 years in prison on 17 more charges merely for exposing US war crimes to the world.
Meanwhile, those who invaded #Iraq on a pack of lies not only still walk free, but are planning new wars against #Venezuela and #Iran."

"Again: the reason Assange sought asylum and Ecuador gave it wasn't to
hide from the Sweden case. He & Ecuador always said he'd go to
Sweden if they promised not to send him to the US. The asylum was to
protect him against this: *espionage* prosecution for *publishing
documents.*"

"Amnesty International-UK: “Julian Assange's case is a case we're monitoring closely but not actively working on." NOT ACTIVELY WORKING ON? Opposing extradition is not enough. Why is AI silent about the ongoing violations of Julian's human rights and of press freedom?"

Amnesty has always worked hand in hand with the American Empire, so we shouldn't expect anything else from them. It is good that this particular incident is opening some eyes.

"Interesting that Democracy Now (!) invites not members of http://syriapropagandamedia.org
group who received leaked OPCW report & offered detailed comment on
it, but instead a journalist who has been criticising the group since
its creation!"

I'm curious about the American strategy here. You would think it would be prudent to hold off on the wild escalation of charges until they had him securely in the US. The effort seems to be to get him to Sweden, but the extra charging seems to make it more difficult to get extradition (Ellsberg doesn't see the death penalty, just a massive sentence, so there's that). The Americans must be certain that the Swedish judicial system is so corrupt that they can go this route and get extradition anyway, which after all maximizes the PR and sets the precedent making all serious journalism illegal.

Related: "Democracy vs. the Putin-Nazis" (Hopkins) (though it seems clear that Trump reelection is the bipartisan plan) and "A New Volkisch Mythos" (good Steppling, who seems to be usually awful).

"Ivanka Receives the 2019 Internet Freedom Award" (Batty). One has to assume for lobbying her father on behalf of the big tech crooks. Trump keeps talking about how bad they are, but never does anything about it.

"Senator Schumer’s Divine Mission" (Davidson). I can understand this kind of racist group supremacist parasitical manipulation going on in secret, but he boasts about his treason, openly and shamelessly.

"Israeli Army Blamed Palestinians for Arson by Settlers. Then a Video Emerged" (Berger).

She tried to atwood her way through taking the shekels!: "Madonna’s Fake Revolution: Eurovision, Cultural Hegemony and Resistance" (Baroud).

"UNRWA rejects U.S. bid to strip it of mandate" (Rothshild). "Defunding UNRWA: Trump’s Legal Sleight of Hand against Palestine" (Najjar). Part of Sheldon's plan. It is the height of anti-Semitism to keep Palestinians alive.

"Trump & Sons: Kushner’s ‘Deal of Century’ is Bribing Palestinians to Go Away" (Henningsen). Oddly, since the 40s, this has always been the 'deal'. Bribe the crooked Palestinian leaders, and promise not to genocide all the Palestinians as long as they 1) continue to do the low-level tasks for Israeli capital; and 2) give up all and every political aspiration, and, of course, all the land including Jerusalem. Literally the only thing new is the number of zeros after the bribe amounts.

Hill is so woke he's a walking alarm clock: "Marc Lamont Hill slams Mizrahi Jews as 'identity category' of Palestinians" (Frantzman). Suggesting there are real Jews and fake Jews, with the fake Jews the ones running Israel, is the biggest taboo possible. Of course, the real Jews are at the bottom of the fake-Jew-created totem poll, just a step above the Palestinians (and the real Jews and Palestinians are genetically identical), making an alliance a logical step absent racist group supremacism that all Jews, real and phony, apparently buy into. It is the same old mechanism whereby poor Southern whites threw their political lot in with the plantation owners rather than the slaves, a problem which still befuddles the US.

"Tucker Carlson Interviews Tulsi Gabbard on Syria False Flag Attacks and War With Iran" (Wallace). Still the single acceptable candidate in either party.

Rahm was Barry's chief of staff when Barry let the elites get away with everything, with no consequences, and yet has a new job with the concentration camp guard - perhaps they can share war stores, IDF war stories! - and has developed a new concern for how the elites get away with everything: "The Rank Hypocrisy Of Rahm Emanuel" (Gosztola). Tweet (Savvy and Realistic Democrat):

"Brings back fond memories of @JeffreyGoldberg’s brave reporting on Iraq-AQ ties in 2002– @NewYorker at its savvy and realistic best!"

Thursday, May 23, 2019

You wouldn't think the Khazars would fail because they cheaped out, particularly with somebody else's shekels, but $560 to sell your complete future, forever, seems a little light: "The Money in the Trump-Kushner Peace Plan" (Baker):

". . . if we take the total population of the four groups listed, it comes to roughly 120 million. This means that the sum that Trump and Kushner hope to raise to induce a commitment to their peace plan comes to $560 per person. This seems to be a one-time figure rather than any ongoing commitment of aid."

"That April 15 meeting was only the most recent one between top U.S. and Israeli national security officials over the past year, according to Ravid. These meetings were conducted under a
still-secret U.S.-Israeli agreement on a joint plan of action against
Iran reached after two days of unannounced meetings at the White House
between Ben Shabbat and then-national security advisor H.R. McMaster on
December 12, 2017. Ravid reported the details of that agreement in late
December based on information from a “senior U.S. official” and
confirmation from senior Israeli officials. Ravid’s story provided details on the
four working groups that were formed under the agreement, including one
on “Joint U.S.-Israeli preparation for different escalation scenarios in
the region, concerning Iran, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in
Gaza.” The Mossad “scenarios” apparently provided the central ideas with
which to justify the Trump administration’s subsequent escalatory moves
against Iran, including ostentatiously moving an aircraft carrier and a
B-52 bomber group into the region."

Pompeo PR press release: "Tensions rise between Pompeo and Bolton". Sheldon has paid good shekels for Bolton, and I would expect the slightly less insane Pompeo would be the first to go, but there is no indication that anybody is going anywhere. Trump likes to surround himself with nuts so he can appear to be the reasonable one, offering the best 'deal' anyone is liable to get.

"Earlier this month, onetime fierce Iraq war opponent Rachel Maddow went on TV to embrace John Bolton in a diatribe about how the poor National Security Adviser has been thwarted by Trump in efforts to topple Maduro.
“Regardless of what you thought about John Bolton before this, his career, his track record,” Maddow said. “Just think about John Bolton as a human being.”
The telecast was surreal. It was like watching Dick Cheney sing “Give Peace a Chance.”"

"From Golden Boy to “Deflated:” The Media Trajectory of Juan Guaido" (Rubenstein). Unless they false-flag assassinate him, and blame it on Maduro, Guido is far past his expiry date, and I expect both Trump and the (((media))) will start pretending Venezuela doesn't exist. Sheldon also paid good shekels for Abrams, so I don't know how that will work out.

"Trump and his team of incompetents are reinforcing Maduro’s support within Venezuela and around the Western Hemisphere. Trump announced that Philip Goldberg, formerly the US ambassador to Bolivia, will take up the same post in Bogota, Colombia. In 2008, Goldberg was expelled from Bolivia for trying to overthrow the progressive government of President Evo Morales. Goldberg also previously served in Bogota as the coordinator of Plan Colombia, a discredited State Department program that was, in reality, a US weapons-transfer and intelligence-sharing operation for Colombian paramilitary units to commit human rights abuses against Colombia’s indigenous population, farm workers, and Afro-Caribbean people along the northern coast.

Goldberg’s modus operandi in Latin America is well known. The Bolivian government said Goldberg conspired with the opposition to foment unrest in Bolivia’s natural gas-rich provinces. Goldberg has also allowed the US embassy in La Paz and the US Peace Corps and Fulbright scholars in the country to be used for espionage purposes. Goldberg was also adept at coordinating terrorist attacks on key infrastructure components. On September 11, 2008—note the date—a gas pipeline from Bolivia to Sao Paulo, Brazil was blown up by US-supported forces. Goldberg also coordinated anti-Morales actions of the right-wing governors of Santa Cruz, Pando, Beni, and Tarija. Opposition groups funded by the United States took over government buildings in the four states. Expect Goldberg, in coordination with Duque’s government, and President Jair Bolsonaro’s neo-fascist government in Brazil to carry out similar actions targeting Venezuela."

"Why Farage Wins the Country and Corbyn Wins Only a Party" (Atzmon). I don't know why Atzmon is so down on Corbyn, as the wisdom of his cucking approach to the Khazars has yet to be determined (after all, if he wins, he can then start gassing the kikes as much as he likes), but this is good stuff, rarely seen:

"The Left’s vision of temporality is a linear structure of historical progress that proceeds from ‘a past’ to ‘a future.’ Left ideology is structured around an ever progressing time line. The Left always promises to make things better in the future, to fight austerity, to care for the many not the few, to bring about equality and tolerance, etc. None of this is happening at present. This leaves the Left as a promise that is supposed to fulfill itself in an imaginary ‘tomorrow.’

But this is not how the Right’s political argument is structured. In fact the Right and Fascist argument is far more sophisticated from a metaphysical perspective. In my recent book, Being in Time, I contend that the Right ideologist understands that for the working class, utopia is ‘nostalgia.’ Trump won his voters’ trust by promising to make America great again. He vowed to plant the past in the future, reversing the time line. He promised to march America backward. Nigel Farage is using the same tactic, appealing to the same sentiments. He promises to make Britain a kingdom again not just a corner island in a dysfunctional globalist setting, a.k.a the EU. Farage is riding on the longing for a better past. Corbyn was a political star only because he is a nostalgic character, an old lefty. For a time, he also reversed the time line, but neither he nor any of his advisers were clever enough to grasp the secret behind the ‘Corbyn revolution’. They let a magical moment of popularity evaporate. Corbyn has become a cliché. His approval rating is 25%, not exactly promising for a candidate for prime minister.

Within the context of Left thinking, past, present and future are chronological, set to follow each other in consecutive order. Within Right wing philosophy, time’s tenses change positions irregularly. Trump and Farage put the ‘past’ in the future. They promise to march us back. They appeal to the masses because the human spirit, in its search for unity, transcends linear chronology. The Right wing ideologist capitalises on the human search for essence, for a logos and for transparency. In this regard, humans are historical creatures. They are capable of seeing the future in the past and vice versa."

"UK
Deep State Plots To Thwart Brexit" (Callaghan). Another way to look at
Farage is that he allows voters to express the view that they don't want
to be swindled out of the intended results of their vote.

"Transparent is only half of it—FBI was monitoring Trump team comms from 10/16 - 9/17, & collected backwards, too. Got nothing. Comey/Mueller turned "collusion" to obstruction traps. More nothing. Turns out Trump, most "investigated" president is US history, may be cleanest, too."

Tweet (Neil Clark) (maybe it is a commentary on the decline of Britain represented by its failure to pick up the trash, but it still doesn't explain how the opened packaged rewrapped itself in the bin!):

"How can a boxed perfume bottle that we were told was left in a bin in
early March, still be in said bin in late June after regular emptyings?
Just one of the many unanswered questions in the #Skripal case."

"‘Orientalism,’ Then and Now" (Shatz) (my emphasis in red, in case you are still wondering where all the Islamophobia comes from):

"As a system of “power-knowledge,” Orientalism has always been based on a desire to know,
and not merely to construct, or even vilify, the Other. The
expeditionary force that Napoleon Bonaparte sent to Egypt in 1798
included 122 scientists and intellectuals, among them a handful of
professional Orientalists. The history of Orientalism is rich in tales
of Westerners assuming Oriental masquerade, as if they wanted to become,
and not simply to master, the Other. Just think of T.E. Lawrence in his
romantic desert gear, or—to take a more extreme example—Isabelle
Eberhardt, a Swiss explorer in Algeria who dressed as a man, converted
to Islam, and reinvented herself as Si Mahmoud Saadi at the turn of the
twentieth century. And in more recent guise is the fictional character
of Carrie Anne Mathison, the CIA officer played by Claire Danes in Homeland, covering herself in an abaya as she plunges into the alleys of the souk.
The knowledge collected by Western explorers and spies was hardly
disinterested: it underwrote colonization, wars of conquest, and
“humanitarian” intervention. Yet this Orientalism preferred to recast
the West’s violent conquests as consensual interactions: seductions, not
rapes. Politically speaking, it was often liberal, republican, and
secular—based, at least in principle, on winning hearts and minds, on
assimilating the Other to Western democratic values. In the French
empire, as Pierre-Jean Luizard argues in his new book, The Republic and Islam,
colonization was “a project led by republican elites opposed to the
clerical right, who were much more cautious about colonial expansion.”
(This, he adds, is an important reason why Arab and Muslim opponents of
French rule came to view liberal secularism with such suspicion.) Even
the Orientalism that justified the Iraq invasion had its conciliatory
side: in the wake of September 11, George W. Bush was explicit in his
rejection of Islamophobia.
Under Trump, the human face of Orientalism has all but vanished. This
might sound like a good thing, insofar as it is a defeat for hypocrisy.
But it’s also something else, something much darker. Back in 2008, I wrote a piece for the London Review of Books about a documentary called Obsession, which had been sent in DVD form to 28 million Americans as an advertising supplement to seventy-four newspapers. Obsession,
which first appeared on Fox News and had been funded by the US real
estate magnate and Likud supporter Sheldon Adelson, was a sixty-minute
screed whose chief claim was that 2008 was like 1938, only worse—since
there are more Muslims than Germans in the world and they’re more
geographically dispersed, an enemy within as well as a hostile foreign
power: “They’re not outside our borders, they are here.” The tone of my
piece was caustic yet bemused because I didn’t take Obsession seriously: it seemed so obviously lurid and marginal.
In retrospect, I was naive. Obsession, if anything,
prefigured the kind of fear and hatred of Islam and Muslims that Trump
has made mainstream and effectively turned into policy, the Muslim
travel ban being only the most flagrant example. Orientalism in the age
of Trump has no interest in promoting democracy or other “Western
values” because these values are no longer believed, or they’re regarded
as an inconvenient obstacle to the exercise of power. This new
Orientalism speaks in the language of deals and, more often, that of
force and repression. It keeps Arab despots in power and angry young men
of Arab origin in prison."

"Greek Debt, Nazi Reparations, and a Fair Shake" (Butler). Easy to fix, just have all the German banks take 100% haircuts on their Greek debt, and call it square.

"Dissecting The Unfathomable American-Iranian War" (Kadi). A summary of the many reasons why Iran Talk is just talk. The Saudis just aren't competent enough to pull a proper false flag, and the Israelis truly fear the Hezbollah rockets, so while the danger of being tricked and stumbling into war still exists, it is, and has always been, quite small.

Tweets (Wesley Yang) (I'm guessing it will prove to be an error to take qualities that are universally praised and label them as examples of unacceptable 'whiteness' - "the new language of power throughout the non-profit sphere" - an ongoing project that has provided much glee for Sailer, particularly as it often shows up in cases where the 'whites' are almost all Asian, or Muslim immigrants):

"German parliament smears quest for Palestinian rights as anti-Semitic" (Hylton) (sad, particularly as the Germans are so largely woke):

"Berlin-based BDS activist Doris Ghannam told The Electronic Intifada,
“it is nothing new that BDS is conflated with anti-Semitism, but to
talk about BDS without mentioning Israel’s human rights violations –
this is unbelievable.”
Activist Christoph Glanz, who won a two-year BDS court case
against local authorities in Germany, told The Electronic Intifada that
Israel lobbyists had “worked towards such a resolution for years.”
“They knew very well that they would not be able to find a legal
basis to outlaw BDS – the European Court of Human Rights would have
thwarted this for good – that’s why the resolution is a mere resolution
and not a law.”"

"Why capturing Huawei is no victory in tech war" (Escobar). Trump may back off and claim this was just part of his 'deal' strategy with China, but if not I see this as the beginning of the end for large portions of the US tech industry. The Chinese have assumed the markets would allow them to buy what they need, and have suddenly discovered that this is not true, and will now certainly take the steps to ensure they are self-sufficient in everything by developing superior products which will leave Assholains in the dust.

"Trump’s ‘trade war’ is a war on you" (Knapp). I'm guessing it is going to turn out to be the single biggest effective tax increase in Assholian history. By 'tax', I mean money that comes out of the pockets of the 99% and goes into the American treasury.

"Well-known novelist and cultural commentator John Derbyshire
explained his concept of an “Arctic Alliance” between Asians and
whites. He said these groups have in common a high mean IQ and low
fertility rates, which could lead to a common strategy against the
“demographic” and “dysgenic” threat posed by mass immigration. Mr.
Derbyshire raised and then refuted several objections to his plan. These
ranged from questions of terminology and feasibility to larger issues
about whether Asians will follow whites down the path of self-hatred. He
wondered whether ethnomasochism is unique to whites or is “the
inevitable result of post-industrial society.” He argued that the
purpose of groups like American Renaissance is to resist dispossession
and to build a defensive strategy of “Arctic peoples” that can ensure
the survival of civilization."

That wag Haim is starting to joke close to home (they don't call them blood diamonds for nothing): "Wedding Experts Say Engagement Ring Should Cost At Least Three Diamond Miners’ Lives".

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

"The leaked document doesn’t by itself prove that the Engineering Assessment is correct and the official OPCW findings are incorrect, it just proves that there were other analyses which differed sharply with the official conclusions we’ve been permitted to see, and that we weren’t permitted to see those analyses. In a post-Iraq invasion world, this by itself is entirely unacceptable. And, rather than pushing for answers and accountability, the so-called journalists of the largest media outlets in the west are completely ignoring it."

The determination here is important enough to serve as the possible justification for a war, which, given the players involved, might turn into WWIII, so you'd think the onus would be on the OPCW to ensure that the report was 100% accurate. A dissenting opinion from a long-time staff member is something that needs, at the very least, mentioning (and probably providing the good reasons why it was rejected), instead of only showing up as a leak from a whistle blower. It is particularly bad when the missing dissent raises all manner of
excellent points which directly refute the official conclusion, a fact
which makes the entire operation look like nothing more than part of
the apparatus of Empire and its desired wars. Of course, such a nuanced report wouldn't have done the warmongers any good. A messy casus belli starts to smell like the missing WMDs of Iraq.

Tinmeline:

March 14, 2018 - Skripal poisoning;

April 7, 2018 - Douma attack (which might arguably been a distraction from the Skripal attack as its Official Story started to fall apart, particularly given the fact that a British spy runs the White Helmets);

June 2018 - OPCW granted authority to place blame for chemical attacks, largely as a result of heavy British lobbying;

March 1, 2019 - OPCW report on Douma; and

late May 2019 - yet another allegation of a chemical attack from the Syrian government.

I note that the actual report doesn't explicitly ascribe blame to the Syrian government as everybody takes it as a given that the shells were delivered from the air - thus the vital importance of whether the shells were placed rather than fell from above - and the Syrian government is the only possible culprit.

It is quite a complex series of players:

somebody to stage the scene (White Helmets = MI6), with the help of the terrorists (al-Qaeda) to supply the dead bodies;

the (((media))) and 'professional' dissemblers like Bellingcat to spread the PR; and

a 'disinterested, 'scientific' organization to provide the 'objective' details of the casus belli.

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

"‘Clash of civilizations’ or crisis of civilization?" (Escobar). Note that the deep roots of this is pure, unadulterated Khazar supremacism, Lewis to Huntington. It is wrecking the American Empire, and turning it into what amounts to a third world country (and dragging the Eurotrash down with it). This is why you are an idiot if you don't think the JQ isn't the single most important issue facing the West.

"Israel's War Criminals In Their Own Words" (Giraldi). Ah, the beauty of unconstrained, unapologetic supremacism. 'Values', goyim.

"Based Pole Slaps Kippah On Sell Out Politician During Debate" (Batty). We need to see more of this.

"Venezuela Exposes the Myth of John Bolton’s “Genius”" (Sieff). I don't know who thinks Bolton is a 'genius', or even competent. He - and Abrams for that matter - has an unblemished record of utter failure. His incompetence is one of the things we have to like about him. Of course, the (((media))) likes him as he is consistently turbo-Zionist.

"If images 5 and 7 were indeed taken the day prior to the attack, the
question then becomes why the FBI officially concluded that the arrested
Israelis had no prior knowledge of the attacks? One report from ABC News dated June 2002 suggests that the Bush administration intervened in the investigation. That report states
that “Israeli and U.S. government officials worked out a deal — and
after 71 days, the five Israelis were taken out of jail, put on a plane,
and deported back home [to Israel].” If the Bush administration had cut
a deal with Israel’s government to cover up the incident, it certainly would not have been the first time a U.S. presidential administration had done so on Israel’s behalf.
Further evidence that higher-ups in the administration intervened is
the fact that then-Attorney General John Ashcroft personally signed off
on the detainees’ release. Upon his entering the private sector as a
lobbyist and consultant in 2005, the Israeli government became one of
Ashcroft’s first clients.
A cover-up certainly seems to have happened to some extent, between
the destruction of records of the investigation and the fact that
official conclusions of the investigation do not add up. In the latter
case, the FBI — in a file dated September 24, 2001– officially stated
that they “determined that none of the Israelis were actively engaged
in clandestine intelligence activities in the United States.” However,
that conclusion was directly contradicted by U.S. officials a year later and by the fact that Israel’s own government subsequently acknowledged that the five Israelis had indeed been involved in “clandestine intelligence activities in the United States.”
In addition, the new FOIA release of the photos suggests that another
FBI conclusion — that “none of the pictures developed from the film
found inside the 35-mm camera depicted the twin towers prior to the
attack” — was inaccurate. This may explain why the images released via
the recent FOIA request were heavily edited leaving details in the
background greatly obscured, making it impossible to determine whether
the photos were taken prior to or during the attacks based solely on the
state of the towers."

and:

"In addition to the strange nature of some of the Israelis’
possessions in the van and on their person, the company that employed
them — Urban Moving Systems — was of special interest to the FBI, which
concluded that the company was likely a “fraudulent operation.” Upon a
search of the company’s premises, the FBI noted that “little evidence of
a legitimate business operation was found.” The FBI report also noted
that there were an “unusually large number of computers relative to the
number of employees for such a fairly small business” and that “further
investigation identified several pseudo-names or aliases associated with
Urban Moving Systems and its operations.”
The FBI presence at the Urban Moving Systems search site drew the
attention of the local media and was later reported on both television
and in the local press. A former Urban Moving Systems employee later
contacted the Newark Division with information indicating that he had
quit his employment with Urban Moving Systems as a result of the high
amount of anti-American sentiment present among Urban’s employees. The
former employee stated that an Israeli employee of Urban had even once
remarked, “Give us twenty years and we’ll take over your media and
destroy your country” (page 37 of the FBI report)."

and:

"The company’s owner — Dominik Otto Suter, an Israeli citizen — had fled to Israel on September 14, 2001, two days after he had been questioned by the FBI. The FBI told ABC News
that “Urban Moving may have been providing cover for an Israeli
intelligence operation.” Surprisingly, since at least 2016, Suter has been living in the San Francisco Bay Area, where he works for a contractor for major tech companies like Google and Microsoft. According to the public records database Intelius, in 2006 and 2007 Suter also worked for a telecommunications company — Granite Telecommunications — that works for the U.S. military and several other U.S. government agencies.In addition to Urban Moving Systems, another moving company, Classic
International Movers, became of interest in connection with the
investigation into the “Dancing Israelis,” which led to the arrest and
detention of four Israeli nationals who worked for this separate moving
company. The FBI’s Miami Division had alerted the Newark Division that
Classic International Movers was believed to have been used by one of
the 19 alleged 9/11 hijackers before the attack, and one of the “Dancing
Israelis” had the number for Classic International Movers written in a
notebook that was seized at the time of his arrest. The report further
states that one of the Israelis of Classic International Movers who was
arrested “was visibly disturbed by the Agents’ questioning regarding his
personal email account.”"

There has never been any doubt that the Israelis had foreknowledge of the attacks. More interesting is the amount of work done by American officials to cover this up. Note also that an extensive Israeli spying network against the US government was rounded up in the aftermath of 9/11, presumably by accident.

It is more than a little ironic that the real, problematic, intelligence operations - both intelligence gathering and mass public manipulation - are coming to light in this era of a phony concern over 'fake news'. The sheer quantity of manipulation that is going on is exhausting. On the bright side, the actual manipulation is a complete failure, just a boondoggle for some intelligence contractors to score some money from corrupt government officials (who no doubt plan to retire and conduct a similar grift in their new sinecures in the private sector).

"Last year MEE reported that the unit was involved in projects which
used rap music and graffiti to attempt to influence the thinking and
behaviour of youths in Tunisia, Morocco and Lebanon.
The documents show that by the end of 2018, RICU operations had been
underway in Jordan, Algeria and Pakistan. The unit has also organised a
number of events in Finland and the Netherlands.
The papers also show that the consortium which won the contract was expected to demonstrate
an ability to operate in at least four other countries in addition to
France: Belgium, Kenya, Bangladesh and Indonesia.
The documents do not disclose the details of the operations being
planned for each country, other than to make clear that they involve the
development of social media strategies, video production, web
development, writing blogs, “paid promotion on Facebook, Twitter and
Snapchat”, leafletting schools and “maintaining a stream of
communications, products and materials”."

and:

"The contract to run RICU’s operations in France, Belgium, the Middle
East and North Africa was won by a consortium headed by Adam Smith
International (ASI), a London-based foreign aid contractor.
Two years ago the founders of ASI were compelled to stand down when
the British government froze future contracts after the contractor was
found to be using leaked official documents to secure commercial
advantage.ASI was subsequently accused of allowing British aid money to be paid to militant groups in Syria, a claim it denied.
The overseas contract is understood to have been one of three
contracts issued late last year. A second was for further RICU
operations in the UK, while the third was for a programme of evaluation.MEE understands that one member of the consortium led by ASI is a
London communications company, Breakthrough Media, which has worked
closely with RICU for several years.
Last year Breakthrough Media faced criticism in Australia for running a number of campaigns without making clear it was funded by the federal government.Subsequently, the company began operating in Australia under a
new name, Zinc Network, which it has since also adopted in the UK."

The Research, Information and Communications Unit (RICU), which is based at the Home Office in London, Adam Smith
International, Breakthrough Media and Zinc Network. We need to understand this in the context of all the 1984-type operations of the spectacularly monikered Integrity Initiative (pretty much hidden, as you would expect, by the (((media)))).

"Damaging Ties: Why Germany is the Integrity Initiative’s 'Most Important Target'" (Klarenberg) (note how completely this ties into the American fear of Russian 'influence, which, as the woke know, derives almost entirely from Zionism, again bringing to the forefront the critical importance of the JQ, although there are also general issues of general imperial decline, also derived mostly from the malign influence of Khazars):

"The Initiative's overseas clusters are comprised of individuals who
"understand the threat posed to Western nations" by Russian
"disinformation" and can be mobilized to influence government policy
in support of the "Anglo-Saxon worldview", and a "tougher
stance" towards the Russian state.
Germany is perhaps the key country of interest for the organization in this regard, and an internal ‘progress report on establishing national clusters' produced July 2018 — a month after its German cluster was founded,
following a two-day meeting in London between Institute/Initiative
representatives and Adomeit — makes clear why. The document's author
states that due to the country's "special vulnerability to Russian
influence", it's a "very hard as well as most important target".
In the aforementioned October 2018 ‘interim report' on
the German cluster, in a section titled ‘Specifically German
Conditions', Adomeit further elaborates on the significance of Germany
to the Initiative, and why it's such a tough — and crucial — nut for the
organization to crack.
"Russia is one [of], if not the most, divisive and contentious issue
in German foreign policy debates…the Russian narrative on the origins
of the crisis in Russia's relations with the West is widely accepted
by German public opinion. Its main theses are after the end of the Cold
War, the US simply replaced the Soviet Union by [sic] Russia, continued
policies of containment, isolation and humiliation, [including] NATO
expansion into areas considered vital to Russian interests and exerted
pressure on Europe, including Germany, to tow the line of its
anti-Russian policies," he writes.
As a result, there's a widespread feeling among the German population
and political class the country "should not fall in line with the US
approach" and "reject the demonization of Russia", which could "raise
yet again the spectre of war in Europe"."

Related (and part of it is literally German nostalgia/longing for National Socialism, the pure Geist of which is now embedded in Israel): "Bundestag falsely brands BDS movement anti-Semitic" (Heard). Note how they hilariously hearken back to their Nazi past to justify their Nazi present!

"Kosovo War at 20: How Britain and America Backed Jihadists Throughout Conflict" (Klarenberg):

"One aspect of the story that's rarely been explored, however, is the
collusion between the KLA, al-Qaeda, and the US and UK's respective
military and intelligence apparatuses in the years preceding the
conflict. The intrigue was quite so deep and cohering, and long-running,
it suggests Western powers consciously and determinedly set out to
break Kosovo away from Serbia, and complete their ongoing destruction
of Yugoslavia — and were intensely relaxed about using the most extreme
Islamic fundamentalist elements as their 'ground troops' in the process.
The KLA was comprised of ethnic Albanians committed to securing not only an independent Kosovo, but a 'Greater Albania' —
an irredentist federation spanning territories in Serbia, Montenegro,
Greece and Macedonia — through insurrectionary violence. The exact date
of its founding is a matter of debate — some suggest it stretches as far
back as 1989, when Slobodan Milosevic revoked Kosovan autonomy and
returned the region to its 1945 status — but the group's campaign
of terror began in earnest in February 1996, when it undertook a series
of attacks against police stations and Yugoslavian government officials,
and bombed Serbian refugee camps created in the aftermath of the brutal
civil wars in Croatia and Bosnia.As German political scientist Matthias Kuntzel has noted,
the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) — Germany's foreign intelligence
service — was instrumental in the initial recruitment, training and
arming of KLA fighters, in order to extend German influence
throughout the Balkans. Several sources suggest Berlin had designs
on Kosovo's immense resource wealth — the Stari Trg mining complex, dubbed by journalist Chris Hedges "the
most valuable piece of real estate" in the region, was a ripe source
of coal, lead, zinc, cadmium, gold and silver, worth at least US$5
billion at the time. Chillingly, the mine had provided the bulk of the
material for Nazi U-Boat batteries following the April 1941 Axis
invasion of Yugoslavia.
In any event, after the KLA's initial burst of savagery, similar
strikes would be carried out intermittently every few months, leading
the US State Department to classify the group as a terrorist
organisation at the start of 1998. Its official analysis noted
the KLA was financed by the drugs trade, organised crime and a variety
of governments — most notably the United Arab Emirates and Saudi
Arabia — and wealthy individuals in the Middle East, including Osama bin
Laden. The al-Qaeda chief had established a base of operations
in Albania in 1994, precipitating the steady flow of jihadists from over half a dozen countries in the Middle East into Kosovo subsequently. One KLA unit was even led by the brother of Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda cofounder and bin Laden's deputy.
Despite Washington's official designation, and the passing in March 1998 of UN Security Council Resolution 1160 which
banned "external support for terrorist activity in Kosovo, including
finance, arms and training", the CIA and US special forces secretly
armed and trained KLA operatives in Albania throughout the year,
before dispatching them back to Kosovo to assassinate Serbian
politicians and policemen, and harass and intimidate Kosovo Albanians
insufficiently enthusiastic about Kosovan independence. These efforts
significantly strengthened the KLA — by the end of 1998, its fighters
numbered in excess of 30,000, and the group were in outright control
of several areas of Kosovo.In 2001,
James Bissett, former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia and Albania,
revealed the purpose of this strategy was explicitly to inflame and
escalate tensions in order to create a pretext for Western intervention.

"The hope was that with Kosovo in flames NATO
could intervene and in so doing, not only overthrow Milosevic…but more
importantly, provide the aging and increasingly irrelevant military
organization with a reason for its continued existence," he explained.

This objective was well-understood by KLA leaders — in a 2000 BBC documentary, Moral Combat: NATO At War,
Hashim Thaci, a key figure in the group elected President of Kosovo
in April 2016, said KLA attacks were specifically carried out against
Serbian authorities in order to "bring retaliation against civilians".

"The more civilians were killed, the chances
of international intervention became bigger, and the KLA of course
realised that. There was this foreign diplomat who once told me, 'Look,
unless you pass the quota of five thousand deaths you'll never have
anybody permanently present in Kosovo from foreign diplomacy'," Dug
Gorani, an Albanian Kosovar negotiator unconnected to the KLA, told the
same programme.

The US Defence Intelligence Agency also enlisted the help of British
foreign spy agency MI6 to arm and train the KLA, with the support of the
Special Air Service (SAS) and private security companies. The SAS would
also be heavily involved in the planning and execution of NATO's
bombing campaign — under the auspices of 'Operation Picnic',
members of the special forces unit were inserted into Kosovo in the
early hours of 21 March 1999, in order to covertly identify the location
of Serbian military units, materiel and supply lines, and potential
invasion routes for NATO ground forces — they were assisted in their
mission by KLA operatives."

"Once the bombing campaign started, Albanians and Muslims residing
in Britain began travelling to Kosovo to join the ground fight — their
passage was permitted, if not outright facilitated, by London. This
phenomenon has been a feature of many 'civil wars' in the Middle East
and elsewhere — for instance, during the Soviet war in Afghanistan,
mujahideen fighters were trained at a variety of camps in Britain,
often by Afghans already residing in the UK. Rahmatullah Safi, a former
senior officer in the royal Afghan army, trained as many as 8,000
insurrectionists, and continued to live in the UK well into the 1990s, when he was regarded by the UN as the Taliban's key representative in Europe.
Similarly, several Libyan rebel fighters involved in the violent
overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi — including Manchester bomber Salman Abedi
and his father — many of whom were subject to 'control orders'
restricting their movements, requiring them to remain at a registered
address for up to 16 hours a day, and limiting their access
to communications resources, were offered an 'open door' by British authorities to fight in Tripoli in 2011.Furthermore, mujahideen already in other parts of the former Yugoslavia — in particular Bosnia,
where as many as 3,000 insurgents fought on the side of the Bosnian
Muslim Army 1992-1995 — were diverted to Kosovo at the behest
of Washington and London. Intriguingly, it appears British army military
intelligence specialist James Le Mesurier came
with them — there, he was chief intelligence coordinator, a role he
took up in Kosovo's capital Pristina once NATO's bombing campaign
started. He would go on to work for a variety of private security
companies, before founding the controversial White Helmets group in Turkey in 2013.
Al-Qaeda allegedly wasn't the only Islamist group MI6 colluded
with in Kosovo. Former US Justice Department prosecutor and army
intelligence officer John Loftus claimed in the wake of the 7th July
2005 London Underground bombings that MI6 recruited three senior al-Muhajiroun figures —
Bakri Mohammed, Abu Hamza and Haroon Rashid Aswat — in 1996
to influence terrorist activities in the Balkans. This alleged
connection is particularly notable given Aswat was a central figure
in investigations of the network which apparently facilitated the 7/7
tube bombings — in November 2004 he met with the attack's alleged
ringleader Mohammad Sidique Khan and accomplice Shehzad Tanweer
in Pakistan, and he left the UK for India mere hours before the attacks.
Suggestions he remained a British intelligence informant, if not agent,
during this period have never been satisfactorily resolved.

​Another individual trained at the Kosovo camps was Omar Khan Sharif,
a British-born Muslim who in 2003 attempted to carry out a suicide
bombing attack in a bar in Tel Aviv, Israel. He apparently got cold feet
at the last minute, and ended up fighting his way out of the bar while
his accomplice, Londoner Asif Hanif, killed himself, two musicians and a
waitress. Sharif's decomposing body was later found floating off a
nearby beach. The specifics of his last hours remain a mystery 16 years
later — although it was revealed post-7/7 he'd attended al-Muhajiroun
meetings in Britain, was an admirer of Abu Hamza, and met Siddique Khan
in 2001.
What's clear is covert Western support of the KLA and other
fundamentalist elements endured long-after NATO's bombing campaign ended
in June 1999. Once Milosevic fell in 2000 and the death of Yugoslavia
was complete, the group merely extended their sphere of conflict
to Macedonia and southern Serbia, in service of their 'Greater Albania'
project — an endeavour the US supported,
at least initially. NATO ground forces and their proxies stood by while
guerrillas pushed past a five-kilometre-wide 'exclusion zone' armed
with mortars and other weapons — the US' NATO 'partners', including the
UK, seemed less enthused by the prospect.

"The CIA has been allowed to run riot in Kosovo
with a private army designed to overthrow Slobodan Milosevic. Now he's
gone the US State Department seems incapable of reining in its bastard
army," a European Kosovo Force battalion commander remarked in March 2001."

It's funny how we have all these rules which apply as long as they suit the upper class twits of the year, until they produce inconvenient results, at which point, they don't apply: "The Missing Step" (Murray).

Monday, May 20, 2019

"Moscow is extremely uneasy over the
possibility of a destabilization of Iran that allows a free transit of
jihadis from the Caspian to the Caucasus.

Which brings us to the heart of the
matter. Diplomatic sources – from Russia and Iran – confirm, off the
record, there have been secret talks among the three pillars of Eurasian
integration – Russia, China and Iran – about Chinese and Russian
guarantees in the event the Trump administration’s drive to strangle
Tehran to death takes an ominous turn.

This is being discussed at the highest
levels in Moscow and Beijing. The bottom line: Russia-China won’t allow
Iran to be destroyed."

and:

"The real deal was, in fact, not
Putin-Pompeo or Pompeo-Lavrov in Sochi. It was actually Lavrov-Wang Yi
(the Chinese Foreign Minister), the day before in Moscow.

A US investment banker doing business in Russia told me: “Note how Pompeo ran like mad to Sochi. We are frightened and overstretched.”

Diplomats later remarked: “Pompeo looked
solemn afterwards. Lavrov sounded very diplomatic and calm.” It’s no
secret in Moscow’s top diplomatic circles that the Chinese Politburo
overruled President Xi Jinping’s effort to find an accommodation to
Trump’s tariff offensive. The tension was visible in Pompeo’s demeanor.

Or as Lavrov diplomatically put it: “In
general, Russia-China cooperation is one of the key factors in
maintaining the international security and stability, establishing a
multipolar world order. . . . Our states cooperate closely in various
multilateral organizations, including the UN, G20, SCO, BRICS and RIC
[Russia, India, China trilateral forum], we are working on aligning the
integration potential of the EAEU and the Belt and Road Initiative, with
potentially establishing [a] larger Eurasian partnership.”

The strategic partnership is in sync on
Venezuela, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan – they want a solution brokered by
the SCO. And on North Korea, the message could not have been more
forceful.

After talking to Wang Yi, Lavrov stressed
that contacts between Washington and North Korea “proceeded in
conformity with the road map that we had drafted together with China,
from confidence restoration measures to further direct contacts.”

This is a frank admission that Pyongyang
gets top advice from the Russia-China strategic partnership. And there’s
more: “We hope that at a certain point a comprehensive agreement will
be achieved on the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and on the
creation of a system of peace and security in general in Northeast Asia,
including concrete firm guarantees of North Korea’s security.”

Translation: Russia and China won’t back
down on guaranteeing North Korea’s security. Lavrov said: “Such
guarantees will be not easy to provide, but this is an absolutely
mandatory part of a future agreement. Russia and China are prepared to
work on such guarantees.”"

It is ironic that Russia's legitimate fears of terrorist spill-over from the planned destruction of Iran are putting a spanner in the plans of the Khazars and their stooges. You will no doubt remember that it was the Khazars who 1) invented modern terrorism in Palestine in the 1930s to kill people and steal their lands, and 2) right after the end of the Cold War, used the fear of terrorism to start the Assholians off on their series of Wars For The Jews, one of which was supposed to be on Iran.

"Oman
– Not Like the Rest of the Gulf" (Vltchek). All the problems caused by
'Islam' - terrorism and the Sunni-Shi'ite tensions - are actually
solely the product of a handful of illegitimate thieving rulers (Saudi and Emirates), fearful
of losing their stolen monies and their heads, mostly crypto-Jews,
working off a mostly Khazar script.

"‘The bin where the bottle (supposedly containing Novichok) was found was regularly emptied, so it seems inconceivable that it had been there since March’. But if the bottle DID contain Novichok & the 2 Russian suspects didn’t put it there, who did? #SkripalCase"

More evidence of the sketchiness of The Intercept: "The Hospital They Didn’t Bomb" (McIlwain). For all the hospitals Assad is supposed to have bombed, Syria must consist solely of hospitals.

"Venezuela: Amnesty International in Service of Empire" (Harris). "SYRIA: Amnesty International bias provides cover for Al Qaeda crimes against the Syrian people in Idlib and Hama" (Beeley). "How Amnesty International is reinforcing Trump’s regime-change propaganda against Venezuela" and "Amnesty International still doesn’t recognise Chelsea Manning as a Prisoner of Conscience" (Emersberger). Amnesty is just a branch of the US State Department, and has been since it was used to attempt to destabilize and delegitimize the Soviet Union.

"The Washington Post’s “Cartel of the Suns” Theory is the Latest Desperate Excuse for Why the Coup Attempt in Venezuela has Failed" (Bolton). 'Cartel of the Suns' and Hezbollah!

"“One day, from his sniper nest, Chief Gallagher shot a girl in a flower-print hijab who was walking w/ other girls on the riverbank. She dropped, clutching her stomach, & the other girls dragged her away.” Trump is preparing to pardon this war criminal."

"It’s Even More Terrible Than You Thought" (Street) (odd to see this in Counterpunch, The Journal of Ridiculous and Counterproductive 'Russian' Attacks on Trump):

". . . establishment Democrats are working hard again, as in 2015-16, to
undermine the presidential candidacy of the Democratic contender who is
most able and ready to rally the disadvantaged constituencies who will
have to turn out if the orange monster is going to be removed by ballot
in 2020.
That candidate is the neo-New Deal progressive-populist Bernie
Sanders. He is the target of a multi-pronged “Stop Sanders” movement
within the Democratic Party and across its many establishment media and
non-profit outposts. This reactionary operation includes at least ten
related lines of attack:
+1. Flooding the primary campaign with such an absurdly large number
of candidates that Sanders will likely be unable to garner the majority
of primary delegates required for a first-ballot nomination at the 2020
Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee.
+2. Coordination among the Democratic Convention superdelegates—the
more than 350 county and state party bosses and elected officials who
are granted delegate status without election—to vote as a bloc to stop Sanders on
the convention’s second ballot. (These superdelegates exist precisely
for the purpose of blocking challengers to the party’s corporate
establishment.)
+3. Ongoing efforts to change state party elections from caucuses to primaries, as caucuses are friendlier to progressive challengers. (Sanders won 11 of the nation’s 18 caucus states three years ago.)
+4. The disingenuous theft of many of Sanders’ sincerely held
progressive policies by corporate candidates who have no intention of
fighting to implement them if they attain the presidency.
+5. Appealing to the name recognition of the right-wing
corporatist-imperialist Joe Biden, along with the public’s misplaced
nostalgia for Barack Obama’s Wall Street-captive presidency—both of
which will be wielded as weapons against Sanders’ progressive populism.
+6. Repeated identity-wielding “gotchya” efforts to make Bernie seem indifferent to Black and female voters.
+7. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s sickening decision to
block contracts with campaign consultants and other political vendors
who agree to work for progressive challengers in the 2020 primaries.
(Besides seeking to protect Congress itself as a corporate preserve,
this move aims to deny Sanders congressional allies and undermine his
ability to govern if elected.)
+8. Recurrent claims that Sanders “isn’t a Democrat” even though
Bernie has long functioned essentially as one in Congress and Vermont
politics (his “Independent” status is for show).
+9. Smearing Sanders’ popular social-democratic policy agenda as
“fantastic,” “unaffordable,” “unrealistic” and too dangerously
“socialist”—this while Democratic elites refuse to acknowledge the
fascist tendencies of the president they helped elect in 2016.
+10. Branding the eminently electable Sanders “unelectable” on the
grounds that he is an “extremist” who is “too far left” for the U.S.
electorate generally and independent voters specifically. In reality,
the opposite is true. Sanders appeals to independents (who are nowhere
near as conservative as is commonly reported), people of color,
infrequent voters and the white working-class that has largely abandoned
the Democratic Party. His anti-establishment message, coupled with his
long record of representing rural voters, makes him highly competitive
with Trump, not only in the Rust Belts states where Hillary Clinton
faltered but even in some dark red states like West Virginia. (Even Karl
Rove believes Sanders could defeat Trump in 2020.)
It’s nasty stuff, but it’s nothing new and nobody should be
surprised. The Democratic Party exists to serve its corporate clients.
Consistent with their party’s Big Business bankrollers’ bottom line
world view, establishment Democrats would rather lose to a fascistic
white-Amerikaner right than to even the mildly social-democratic left
within their own party. It’s why the late left-liberal political
scientist Sheldon Wolin labeled them “the Inauthentic Opposition.”"

Direct descendant - well he can't be, as he isn't even in the same race as his mythological ancestor - of a mythological person!: "Should a Jewish Priest Be US Ambassador to Israel?" (Johnson).

"Poland to Jews: “We Owe Nothing”" (Anglin). "Congress: No U.S. Military Base for Poland Until It Pays for Holocaust Victims" (Kredo). I guess we'll find out what gives when a country so devoted to the Cold War that it will endanger its own citizens crosses the Khazar Shake-Down Unit.

"Why The Takedown Of Heinz-Christian Strache Will Strengthen The Right" (Moon).

Saturday, May 18, 2019

You know I'm always saying we have to examine these conspiracies from the point of view of the conspiracy planners, who have a goal, and a detailed script. Sometimes things go sideways, and they have to improvise, which never goes well.

"The OPCW, Douma & The Skripals" (Catte, from 2018, before the latest revelations that the OPCW knew the Douma attack was faked) (my emphasis in red):

"If a false flag chemical attack had taken place in Syria at the time Russia predicted, just a week or two after the Skripal poisoning, a lot of the attention that’s been paid to the Skripals over the last month would likely have been diverted. Many of the questions being asked by Russia and in the alt media may never have been asked as the focus of the world turned to a possible superpower stand-off in the Middle East.

So, could it be the Skripal event was never intended to last so long in the public eye? Could it be that it was indeed a false flag, or a fake event, as many have alleged, planned as a sketchy prelude to, or warm up act for a bigger chemical attack in Syria, scheduled for a week or so later in mid-March – just around the time Russia was warning of such a possibility?

Could it be this planned event was unexpectedly canceled by the leading players in the drama (the US) when the Russians called them out and the rapid and unexpected fall of Ghouta meant any such intervention became pointless at least for the moment?

Did this cancelation leave the UK swinging in the wind, with a fantastical story that was never intended to withstand close scrutiny, and no second act for distraction?

So, did they push on with the now virtually useless “chemical attack”, botch it (again), leaving a clear evidence trail leading back to them? Did they then further insist on an allied “response” to their botched false flag in order to provide yet more distraction and hopefully destroy some of that evidence?

This would explain why the UK may have been pushing for the false flag to happen (as claimed by Russia) even after it could no longer serve much useful purpose on the ground, and why the Douma “attack” seems to have been so sketchily done by a gang on the run. The UK needed the second part to happen in order to distract from the first.

It would explain why the US has been less than enthused by the idea of reprisals. Because while killing Syrians to further geo-strategic interests is not a problem, killing Syrians (and risking escalation with Russia) in order to rescue an embarrassed UK government is less appealing.

And it would explain why the “reprisals” when they came were so half-hearted.

If this is true, Theresa May and her cabinet are currently way out on a limb even by cynical UK standards. Not only have they lied about the Skripal event, but in order to cover up that lie they have promoted a false flag in Syria, and “responded” to it by a flagrant breach of international and domestic law. Worst of all, if the Russians aren’t bluffing, they have some evidence to prove some of the most egregious parts of this.

This is very bad."

"James Le Mesurier: The Former British Mercenary Who Founded The White Helmets" (Webb):

"Though mainstream narratives have suggested that the White Helmets were trained by the Red Cross, the White Helmets were actually founded
in March 2013 by Le Mesurier. He, like many officers in the British
military, attended the Royal Military Academy, where he graduated at the
top of his class, receiving the Queen’s Medal.
He later served
in the British Army and operated in a variety of theaters. Most
notably, Le Mesurier served as intelligence coordinator for Pristina
City in Kosovo soon after the NATO intervention that led to NATO being accused of war crimes for its targeting of thousands of civilians and media.
By 2000, Le Mesurier left the army and went to work for the United Nations as he had “realized humanitarian aid was more effective” than an army in theaters of war during his time with the British military. He, again, served in a variety of locations, focusing on
“delivering stabilization activities through security sector and
democratization programs.” According to Le Mesurier, “stabilization
activities” refers to the “framework for engagement in ‘fragile’ states”
or, in other words, destabilized nations.

Prior to his founding of the White Helmets, Le Mesurier served as Vice President for Special Projects at the Olive Group,
a private mercenary organization that has since merged with
Blackwater-Academi into what is now known as Constellis Holdings. Then,
in 2008, Le Mesurier left the Olive Group after he was appointed to the
position of Principal at Good Harbor Consulting, chaired by Richard A. Clarke
– a veteran of the U.S. national security establishment and the
counter-terrorism “czar” under the Bush and Clinton administrations.

After joining Good Harbor, Le Mesurier became based
in Abu Dhabi, where he specialized in risk management, emergency
planning, and critical infrastructure protection. He trained a UAE gas
field protection force and “ensured the safety” of the 2010 Gulf Cup in
Yemen, a regional soccer tournament. But following this work, Le
Mesurier claims to have become dissatisfied, wanting to have a more
direct impact on the communities he worked in."

and (what better way to deliver your PR than through using the heroes, first responders?):

"As Le Mesurier noted in a speech
delivered on June 2015, in “fragile” (i.e. destabilized) states,
security actors – such as mercenaries or foreign armies – have the
lowest level of public trust. However, Le Mesurier states that in
contrast, those professions with the highest level of public trust in
such situations are firefighters, paramedics, rescue workers and other
similar types of first responders."

and (ha!):

"Other medical doctors have stated that other procedures conducted by the
White Helmets as seen in the previously mentioned Netflix documentary
were performed so poorly they would have killed the children, who were
already deceased when the footage was taken."