Obama’s Plan–> National Debt to Represent 83% of GDP

It was President Calvin Coolidge who said, “The business of the country is business.”

If President Barack Obama gets his way, the “Business of the country will be debt”

Remember when the Congressional Budget Office was called the Non Partisan CBO ? Remember when it was considered the gold standard of economic projections ? Well that was all before the Obama Administration. The CBO didn’t change, they just had the nerve to disagree with the President’s projections.

According to the CBO, the Obama administration lowballed its deficit forecast by $482 billion over the next four years and $2.3 trillion over the next 10. In other words, the CBO says that 10-year deficits will be 33% higher than the president claims, should his plans get enacted. Based on the Congressional Budget office report next year two thirds of the output of the United States will be National Debt, and in 2015 it will be over 80%.

If President Obama gets his way, our national debt will be taken where no national debt has gone before. And for the United States it may very well be, the final frontier:

In his budget message, the president says “the time has come to usher in a new era of responsibility.” But a new report shows the only thing his budget delivers is an unprecedented era of deficits and debt.

Late Friday, the Congressional Budget Office issued its review of the Obama budget. It’s a standard exercise for the CBO, except this time the results were stunning.

According to the CBO, the Obama administration lowballed its deficit forecast by $482 billion over the next four years and $2.3 trillion over the next 10. In other words, the CBO says that 10-year deficits will be 33% higher than the president claims, should his plans get enacted.

This makes Obama’s budget one of the worst accounting jobs ever put forward in modern times by a new administration.

When the CBO reviewed George W. Bush’s first budget, for example, the difference between what Bush said his budget would cost and what the CBO said it would cost was minimal. Ditto its review of Clinton’s first budget.

Even Reagan’s first budget, which was widely panned for allegedly employing rosy scenarios to cook the numbers, differed from the CBO by just 1.2% in projected revenues and 5% in spending over the first four years.

So why the huge gap between Obama and the CBO?

Obama’s team employed one of the oldest budget tricks in the books — exaggerating economic growth — to hide the true cost of his tax and spending plans. Budget forecasts are hugely sensitive to predictions about GDP growth, inflation, unemployment and interest rates. Even slight differences can have a huge impact on projected outlays and revenues.

And in his budget, Obama is positively Pollyannaish about the economy, predicting 3.2% real GDP growth next year, compared to the CBO’s 2.9% and the Blue Chip consensus forecast of 1.9%. While the CBO and Blue Chip think unemployment will be 9% in 2010, Obama claims it will be only 7.9%. And so on.

Shorn of these tricks, the CBO finds that what remains is a fiscal plan that will leave the country mired in gargantuan deficits and debt.

Over the next decade, Obama’s plan will produce annual deficits averaging 5.3% of the economy — compared with a post-war average of 2%. Even Obama’s own budget director says that’s unsustainable. Meanwhile, the national debt will hit 82.4% of GDP in 2019 under Obama’s plan, according to the CBO, more than double the post-war average.

Worse, none of this includes Obama’s pledge to expand health coverage. In his budget, he sets $606 billion over the next decade for health reform — through Medicare cuts and new taxes. But that’s less than half the money most experts say is needed to fulfill Obama’s universal health care pledge, leaving still more federal debt on the books.

Worse still, Obama would pile on all this debt just before the baby boomers start retiring in earnest, putting intense new pressures on federal deficits. Social Security’s annual deficits will top $100 billion in 2020 and quickly go up from there, according to the Social Security Administration.

In response to all this, the administration says it’s not giving an inch on its huge spending plans. And it goes on to dismiss the CBO as unreliable. “The CBO’s projections,” Obama budget director Peter Orszag wrote on the White House Web site, “are subject to a high degree of uncertainty.”

It’s a new era, all right. But clearly not a more responsible one.

Become a Lid Insider

Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.