Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Yes, you certainly should be able to open multiple connections to the
>>same remote port.
>>Are you supplying the 3rd and 4th (optional) arguments to
>`tcp-connect', which determine the local interface and port for the
>connection? If so, that could be the problem, since you can use each
>local port only once. But supplying the 3rd and 4th arguments is
>unusual.
>>Matthew
>>Indeed I was not supplying the 3rd and 4th arguments to tcp-connect,
which is why I was a little suprised. Someone suggested offlist that I
might be running out of local ports, so I wrote some code to track the
number of ports I open. Unfortunately it doesn't open more than about
4000 before the exception occurs. The number changes each time I run it.
The problem comes and goes, so I'll work on getting a test case together.