I screened Site Unseen at the open studio
for Ah’bé Landscape Architects in May 2005 for
40 landscape architects and architects, many of who sought
me out to talk about the issues
raised by the film.

I intend to propose a show of photographs and the video to
the Center for Land Use Interpretation in Los Angeles as well
as various upcoming symposia on urban design.

Site Unseen demonstrates that video is a great tool for site
exploration, allowing a designer to investigate spaces through
time, and to stimulate discussion about space, place, and perception.

other issues as appropriate.

Site Unseen explores the meaning of these “in between”
places through seven chapters; each one posing a unique set of
questions intended to open up the viewer’s eyes and ability
to “see” theses sites.

The film asks questions such as:

How does one write about a space, which seems to have no
purpose?

Can a place be a meta-sign? Can one place be useful in defining
other places?

Do site inventories really help unlock the meaning of a place?

Can you remember all of the places you drive by near your
home?

If we need nonsense to stand in opposition
to sense making in language, do we also need “nonsense” places
in the city in order to understand the skyline, plazas, stripmalls,
and freeways?

I have taken Los Angeles as the city to explore in part because
this is where I live, but also because this is a city that is,
as a whole, very difficult to grasp. As the city continues to
redevelop various areas these places are consumed and then reappear
in new places.

Site Unseen extends the usage of
film and video as an effective medium for exploring a site,
following in the footsteps
of William Whyte, whose films changed our thinking about the
use of public space. Site Unseen also breaks from the traditional
documentary by looking beyond what is immediately visible to
a
range of ideas or “ways of seeing” that directly
impact discourse on how to best use the urban space.