Ecology of Peace Culture Legal Submissions and Correspondence: clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits are the enablers of all local, national and interational – race, religious, class and gender – resource conflict.

I don’t know what General Robert E Lee’s character definitions of honour or conscience were, upon which his military leadership strategic and tactical decision-making was founded. I don’t know what General Lee’s response would have been if one of his advisors had suggested an EoP TRC to End the American Abel and Kane Civil War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] option to implement an EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] Amendment to the US Constitution and Bill of Rights as a responsible freedom peace path to ending slavery and the civil war; requiring all Americans of all races, to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits. Would he have have said: Lets investigate to see if it can be done; or I don’t want it to be done, cause I like profiting of cheap economic and/or military cannon fodder labour. What would Robert E Lee’s honour and conscience response have been? This is a question I have asked myself of other – Aryan / European / Jewish – leaders who had strong racial ideologies, such as Adolf Hitler, Hendrik Verwoerd, John Vorster, Golda Meir. If General Lee had accepted such EoP TRC advice and supported implementing an EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] Amendment to the US Constitution and Bill of Rights; all other nations constitutions founded on the US constitution principles would have followed suit, like dominoes leading to EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law. Such EoP SciCult international law would have provided the legal protection of the natural capital foundation of all nations, races, religions, and life for all species; removed the need for standing armies, and enabled small governments.
» EoP Leg Sub: 27 Nov: EoP Re: The Robert E Lee Beam in Stanley McChrystal’s Leadership Eye.

Shabtai Shavit, Mossad Director, 1989-1996: First off, a personal confession. I never spoke publicly about public and political issues. When I did speak, I spoke as a retired intelligence officer and that was it. What has happened now, recently. There is a window where Israel’s interest meet with Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states, Egypt and Jordan. It’s a windown that I’m not sure will stay open for much longer. When Arafat was in Cairo, for the signing of the Oslo Accords, Mubarak on the one said, Rabin on the other, and in the last minute, when the world was watching, Arafat said: “I’m not going to sign this,” and Mubarak yelled at him, “Sign it you dog,” and he signed. What a surprise. So I believe after all the failed talks with Western mediators. It makes sense to try to negotiate when there are mediators in the region. In my opinion, when an Israeli government issues a policy statement, saying it is willing to discuss the Arab Peace Initiative, everything will change for Israel, it will flip upside down, 180 degrees, even before we sit down to negotiate. ……… Major General Avi Mizrahi; Head of Central Command, 2009-2012: In November 2013, I retired from the IDF. Until then I was limited in what I could say, now I can talk. As head of Central Command I worked closely with the Palestinians on what is called their ‘security mechanisms’. We got to a very high level of operational cooperation and intelligence cooperation. I don’t want to go into detail but at the beginning I didn’t believe it, that they have the ability, they have the will, and again they don’t love us; but we have a common interest, they are scared of Hamas, maybe even more than us. And therefore this works. Now, this security cooperation needs to be translated to political cooperation. I wanted to see how it worked on the other side. I went one night to Ramallah, wearing civilian clothes, without guards, and unarmed. I sat in a Cafe at El-Manar square. I saw young people; with laptops, the thin apple ones, not like we have in Israel. On wifi, talking to the world. I started talking to them, how they see the situation and what they see for the future. They said, they think at the end they will have their own state. That is their aspiration. I asked about the day-to-day life. They said there is no doubt that the situation has improved but that is not enough. In other words they are in favour of economic peace if that was enough, but its not enough. Military strengthy has a limit. If today, lets say 10,000, 20,000 100,000 Palestinians cross Kalandia crossing to Jerusalem. What do I do? Stand and shoot them? Lets say you find a general who gives that order. You think his comrades will listen?! I don’t think so! Now, could something like this happen? Yes, it can. And therefore, force has its limit. I believe there can be a solution. I believe such a solution requires sacrifice from both sides, but they are concessions that both sides can live with, because the alternative is much worse. And if someone tells me that we have flipped over every rock in pursuit of peace, thats not true. We haven’t flipped over every rock, only some of them. – Israel Policy Forum: The Commanders: Avi Mizrahi; Shabtai Shavit.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jan: EoP Re: IPF-Mossad Re Gov Peace Policy Statements, IDF Re Military Orders to shoot thousands; EoP Axis Leg Licensing deadline postponed: 18 Feb 2018.

He was a senior commander who went with his units from house to house, from bunker to bunker, from orange grove to orange grove; to explain what he meant. And three months later, Gaza was quiet. Terrorism was crushed with an iron fist, with a cruel hand. He cast fear into Gaza. …. They were afraid of him, really scared. He explained to me once in a very simple manner; that he went to put an end to terrorism in Gaza. He was head of Southern Command. His method was simple. Every Arab caught holding a weapon; was shot on the spot. …… Ariel Sharon is a farmer, and that is a very important side of his personality. He tells about how he has watched the cow bellowing as it is moved from the large corral to the smaller corral, and finally into the chute where it is taken to the slaughter and he sees himself in some respects as the cow or the bull being cornered and his job is basically to shut the gates, so that it becomes impossible to move him from the larger corral to the smaller corral to the chute. If you look at the way that he deals with the efforts of outside powers to move the process forward, he is always putting gates, shut gates infront of them. He is prepared to have those gates opened, but he will extract a price for them. That is his tactic and its quite effective. But just as he imagines himself as the cow and the bull, so he understands that it is very effective to treat others in the same way as the cow and the bull, and to move them from the corral, until he’s got them in the chute where he wants them. — Eli Landau & Uri Avnery; Anna Bens: Israels Generals: Ariel Sharon.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jun: EoP Draft: Assange: Re: MEGA Database for EoP Land Reform Denuclearization; 30 Jan: EoP Re: IPF-Mossad Re Gov Peace Policy Statements, IDF Re Military Orders to shoot thousands; EoP Axis Leg Licensing deadline postponed: 18 Feb 2018.

Setup a Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] and EoP Peace Policy Statement [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za] Database [responsible-freedom-db.tygae.org.za] in the Israeli Dept of Justice or in a court venue, where any Israeli citizen and/or resident who considers themselves subjectively:

[A] Chess Pawns: a sincere peacenik / honourable warrior conscientious objector – whether a civilian pacifist; or soldier refusing to fight in an objectively or subjectively perceived illegal war – can sign their responsible freedom oaths [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za]; to provide PM Netanyahu and Knesset politicians with a mandate to begin official EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] negotiations to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law with Middle East and EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] nations.

[B] Chess Royalty and Court: a national, racial, religious, ideological etc strategic and/or tactical national security decision-maker; i.e. who considers themselves a member of the national elite – business, military, religious, charity, political, academic etc – can sign their leadership EoP Policy Statement; to provide PM Netanyahu and Knesset politicians with a mandate to begin official EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] negotiations to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law with Middle East and EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] nations.

If there is any ‘Lets investigate to see if it can be done’ interest in signed oaths and policy statements; EoP MILED Clerk can setup a temporary application in a South African court venue in cooperation with the IL Embassy in Pretoria and Judge Jason Brent [eop-v-jgb.tygae.org.za]; for Israeli diaspora individuals to submit their responsible freedom oaths, EoP policy statements and/or legal objections to such court proceedings. If sufficient sincere peaceniks submit their oaths; PM Netanyahu and the Knesset can appoint such individuals to setup and manage the Database in the Ministry of Justice or IDF; and use such database submissions as a mandate to embark on official EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law. Responsible freedom oath objectors can be put to work in logistics etc support of EoP TRC negotiations.

If there is no – or insufficient – ‘Lets investigate to see if it can be done’ interest response; then PM Netanyahu and the Knesset can proceed with greater certainty that Israeli – pacifist and soldier – objections to military service are not objectively scientifically based sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] motivated; and proceed to ascertain whether such – racial, religious or gender based – subjective objections are worthy of their legislative enquiry or not.

Orthodox Jewish Leadership and Membership:

Sincere peacenik objectors:

Ask all Orthodox Jews objecting to being drafted into military service who are sincere peacenik / honourable warrior conscientious objectors to sign their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za], by a particular deadline date.

Fake peacenik objectors:

Notify all Orthodox Jews objecting to being drafted into military service who are fake peacenik / honourable warrior conscientious objectors who (a) refuse to sign their responsible freedom oaths, by a particular date and (b) refuse to notify the Responsible Freedom database authorities of their written reasonable justification for their refusal; that (c) by such refusal, they shall convict themselves of intentional crimes of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; and be required to remove their fuck honour genes from the planetary genepool, within one month from the deadline date, by their preferred method of assisted suicide. All fake peacenik objectors who have not removed themselves from the genepool by the required date, shall be humanely assassinated by IDF snipers.

Ask all Orthodox Jewish leadership and academics to clarify if they are aware of any scientific errors in the Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law legal ‘sustainability’ – aka sustainable procreation and consumption footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] – definition; and if so to kindly provide such information asap, so that the definition can be amended for scientific accuracy; and an apology provided for the error.