If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Dear Members,

Keep in mind that Character Bashing is now prohibited. Making fun of certain characters/character pairings leads to a pointless thread filled with insults and general rule breaking.
Also, remember that Versus threads are allowed only in the Versus section.

Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

Hi DrProof,

Would you mind to use more common words in your next thread?
I understand, that you are trying hard to formulate nice and precise, but it would be of better proof of your intelligence if you would use appropriate words.

I gladly would like to enter such a discussion, but for me, and probably a big part of this forums multicultural community, this is beyond easy understanding.

On topic to your post:
I hardly criticize deductive logic on so called "manga facts".
Real world science just does not apply to a fiction manga world.

Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

Originally Posted by DrProof

Conception

Constant falsity is directed into subsection when rivaling the current binomial techniques at hand; Raikiri and Kirin. Theoretically speaking, Raikiri was canonically stated to have extirpated a lightning bolt; albeit bystanders seem to delude presented evidence when paralleling said methods.. Thus reasoning for said threads construction; illuminating an important misconception:Raikiri invalidly cannot extirpate Kirin, insistently deluding canonical evidence stated within the manga.. "No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." -Albert Einstein

The moment I read this whole paragraph, I said to myself, "Here we go again. Another piece written by a thesaurus junky." So many words within this piece are written out of context.

I understand that there is a division between many people due to the debate between Raikiri's capability to counter or negate Kirin, but the author using the word "subsection" does not describe the division between the debate. We have no division within a division regarding the stance of the people that participate in this debate.

The author used the word "binomial" to describe both Raikiri and Kirin, and I do not see any relationship between the two jutsus that can regard them to be binomial. Within the mathematical context, the written language will only make sense if "binomial" was used for the addition or subtraction of the two jutsus. In example, "The argument that sets apart the Kakashi aficionados from the Sasuke fanatics is the binomial effect of adding (or possibly subtracting) Raikiri and Kirin when these two jutsu clash in their full potential."

Then, the author mentions, "Raikiri canonically stated to have extirpated a lightning bolt." Upon reading further, the author only states that "Maito Gai astonishingly stated Kakashi severed a lightning bolt with said technique." Please... PLEASE... there is a difference between a canon and an account. The word "Canonically" does not apply as it was only an account of Maito Gai and not a widely accepted dogma by all shinobis (nor even for all the fanbase yet). Furthermore, as the author continues "canonically" with the word "stated," then there should be a general rule not an account that proves his statement. The aforementioned sentence started my judgment that this is clearly an annoying writing.

This is not where the slaughter of many of the words' context ends. I mean seriously, did he just say "bystanders"? Bystanders are spectators, watchers or witnesses of an event. We have seen the use of Raikiri and Kirin on separate episodes of battle, but Kishimoto never illustrated a battle between Kakashi and Sasuke in which Raikiri and Kirin are used against each other. None of us can possibly a spectator nor a witness of such event. As a writer, the word "observers" will suffice.

Moving along, the author writes "for said threads construction." I can bet that other readers were thrown off from this phrase. Before this phrase is introduced, there was no aforementioned thread to to begin with, but rather it comes after this phrase. That tense threw me off which then leads me to question his use of the word "construction." But then fortunately for us, that word was used correctly.

At least, the author did come up with a thesis! Woohoo for us, the author learned something from his writing classes: to write the focal argument of his piece. Then, what was that? A colon? Oh my gosh, he actually learned how to use it too! HOWEVER, his thesis becomes confusing. As the author uses the phrase, "invalidly cannot," this double negative makes it harder for everyone to understand the argument. Additionally, as the author writes "insistently deluding canonical evidence," the two words smack-dab in the middle bother me. The word "deludes/deluding" is used meaning to deceive, but the author fails at recognizing the fact that the direct object of this verb must be a person that is deceived not a thing that is misconstrued. Also, refer to the third paragraph above to read about the author's fallacy for the use of the word "canonical."

But wait, there's more! This guy unduly uses a quote from Albert Einstein, in which Mr. Einstein's quote does not provide evidence nor support his argument. What I see now is a moron who demands respect by portraying himself as an authority of knowledge much like Albert Einstein, thus a doctor of proof from his username DrProof.

--------

In conclusion, your evidence and argument is enough. Just make sure to throw out your style of writing in the garbage.

Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

Well good day sir. Ok!
1st of all this is common sense, this thread was not needed to prove the obvious. 2nd I really have hard time believing that Kakashi ever cut a lightning bolt. He is just too slow for that and I know for sure that no one in Naruto is fast as light. So it should be simple that Kirin>Chidori/Raikiri.

Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

I don't like your over use of your elaborate vocabulary. First of all you know that a lot of younger people on here won't understand you, and it just makes you seem so arrogant...

The message of the thread is good though. But really you are just stating something that we pretty much all know, and that no one even cares about...

^ This.

I have seen your threads before and you are indeed very articulate in the manner which you type, I also like a majority of the ones you create. However, was there really a need to create this thread? I mean honestly, the manner in which you severely overuse "big words" is unnecessary. Was the creation of this thread solely for the sake of letting everyone know "DrProof is back" and therefore the reason why you exaggerate a topic which could easily be simplified into 2 lines? Genuine question.

Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

I hope at this point you can see where all theses people are coming from, you just look like a pretentious tryhard with the over use of such advanced vocabulary words. To some it may make you look like the smartest person on the base and make them admire and trust in your opinion, but to others it is obvious that you're trying way to hard too sound smarter when most people already know you're pretty smart to begin with. Anyone can go to thesaurus.com and make a thread just like this.

OT: Kakashi simply cannot move fast enough, and if he even has enough chakra to cut through it he would absolutely destroy his body doing so. When he countered Kakuzo's lighting Tech he scorched his hand and he didn't even cut through it, he just canceled it out because it was the same chakra nature. Now imagine what would happen even IF he was fast enough and was able to pump out enough chakra to cut through it, he'd be destroyed.

Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

Originally Posted by Dribbles

Well what point is this thread if half of us can't understand it? I write my own fanfictions and I can't identify half the words in there. You're on a forum filled with trolls and morons, you'd expect this kind of reaction from half the people here.