Attacks on Planned Parenthood are Ideologically Driven and Dangerous

Anne Davis & Pratima Gupta

We are board-certified obstetrician/gynecologists, and our daily work includes providing comprehensive reproductive health care, such as abortion. We know that defunding Planned Parenthood is a bad idea. All our clinical experience and current research indicate doing so would cause great harm.

Planned Parenthood and comprehensive sexual and reproductive health care perennially come under attack in the United States. Recently, scientists, doctors and patients have been the targeted for participating in fetal tissue research, despite the fact that medical breakthroughs from such research benefit each and every one of us. This most recent siege on abortion expanded into a broad campaign to defund Planned Parenthood—a months-long media circus punctuated by fruitless Congressional investigations and political posturing.

In our country’s incomplete and complicated patchwork of health care, access depends on a number of factors, especially geographical location and income. For many, Planned Parenthood is the only safety net. Recent analysis by the Guttmacher Institute shows unequivocally that Planned Parenthood plays a major role in delivering publicly supported contraceptive services nationwide.1 The numbers are striking; in 2013, of the nearly 2.7 million people who received care from Planned Parenthood, at least 60% qualified for public health coverage programs. The vast majority of these Americans lived at or below 150% of the federal poverty level.2 Barring Planned Parenthood and other entities that provide family planning services from Title X or Medicaid funding unfairly burdens people with low incomes.

Planned Parenthood strives to care for our most vulnerable populations: young people, the poor and marginalized, and the uninsured or underinsured. In many locations, there is simply no other provider who fills this need. As research from the Congressional Budget Office illustrates, blocking Medicaid patients from seeking care at Planned Parenthood health centers would result in as many as 390,000 people losing access to preventive health care in the first year.3 Adding insult to injury, taxpayers would bear the financial brunt: Over the next decade, they would pay $130 million due to the inevitable increase in unintended pregnancies.4

In a poll conducted by USA Today, over two-thirds of Americans support continued funding for Planned Parenthood5—they recognize the integral role the organization plays, and the quality care it provides for families around the country. Those who seek to defund Planned Parenthood claim that other health care providers can fill the void, but this is simply not true. Already, overextended community health centers lack the capacity to step in as reproductive health care providers.6 Currently, Medicaid-managed care struggles with extreme provider shortages, with only 42% of in-network obstetrician/gynecologists able to offer appointments.7 It is unconscionable that members of Congress would vote to curtail vital preventive care: cervical and breast cancer screening, contraception, prenatal care, sexually transmitted infection screening – all vital parts of maintaining a healthy community.

Planned Parenthood and other Medicaid service providers are being targeted because they provide abortion services. Defunding could force the closure of hundreds of locations where women receive preventive care, if the organization also provides abortion with their non-federal funding stream.

And more to the point: Regardless of one’s personal feelings about it, abortion remains critical to women’s health and well-being. One in three U.S. women has an abortion by 45 years of age.8 These are our sisters, our friends, our coworkers. These women are us. Ninety-seven percent of obstetrician-gynecologists report having seen a patient who was in need of abortion care.9 However, due to a variety of complicated issues, only 14% are able to offer abortion services.10 Without Planned Parenthood and its doctors, more women will be forced to postpone abortions until later in pregnancy, carry complicated, risky pregnancies to term, or—most worrisome—seek illegal, and dangerous, means of ending their pregnancy. This is already happening in Texas, a state that has shuttered 28 of its abortion clinics. Women bear the burden as needless delays pile up and self-induced abortion is on the rise.11 As physicians trained after Roe v. Wade, we hope we never see our patients suffer or die from the complications of illegal abortion.

The attacks on abortion, abortion providers, and women who have abortions do nothing to advance women’s health. It is shameful that ideologues discount the dedication and compassion of clinicians who devote their lives to helping women. Stopping Planned Parenthood from providing care for low-income women would have devastating and long-term consequences for public health, and as physicians who care for, and about, women, we won’t stand by and let this happen.

About the Authors

Dr. Anne Davis is an associate professor of clinical obstetrics and gynecology at Columbia University Medical Center in New York City. Her research interests include new hormonal contraceptives, how women use contraceptives, and contraception in women with medical problems. She is the Consulting Medical Director of Physicians for Reproductive Health.

Pratima Gupta, MD, MPH, joined Physicians for Reproductive Health in August 2015 as the third Reproductive Health Advocacy Fellow. Dr. Gupta has worked at Kaiser Permanente since September 2007. She completed a Fellowship in Family Planning at the University of California, San Francisco in 2005. During this fellowship, she also received a Masters in Public Health from University of California, Berkeley, in Global Health. She is a former PRH board member and a graduate of the Leadership Training Academy class of 2010.

Primary care is critical for the improvement of healthcare overall. Health technology and telehealth are important for success in primary care environments. This article focuses on clinical transformations in technology, to improve the current clinical environment.

Today, people are living healthier lives and longer than ever. Improvements in living conditions and public health measures such as immunizations have saved millions of lives. Yet this progress is unequally distributed both within and between countries. More than half of the world’s population still lack access to PHC.

American Indians in the United States have faced health disparities for over 500 years. Dr. David Jones, Harvard University A. Bernard Ackerman Professor of the Culture of Medicine, has been a key advocate challenging immodest claims of causality regarding American Indian health.

Across the world, two and one half billion people live with uncorrected vision, 80% of whom reside in low resource settings. Beyond the cost of not being able to see the world clearly, uncorrected refractive errors (a major source of uncorrected vision) cost a global $227 billion dollars in lost productivity per year. Currently, there exists one solution that has yet not been explored which has the potential to radically lower the cost of corrective eyewear and leap across the urban-rural divide: pinhole glasses.

Dr. Suzanne Koven, primary care physician and Writer in Residence at Massachusetts General Hospital, discusses narrative medicine and the increasingly popular use of storytelling to benefit both patients and healthcare providers.

Social Media (#SoMe) has become a global phenomenon with more than 73% of adults actively engaged online. Specific to healthcare, these applications are being included with ever increasing frequency as a complement to both patient treatment and medical training. Furthermore, #SoMe has permitted medical innovators to transcend traditional limits and collaborate via methods previously unexplored. These platforms will only become more influential in the healthcare sector as more people around the world gain internet access.

The need to rehabilitate American infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and water systems is well recognized. These services are used daily by millions and impact the economy, health, and commerce of America. Likewise, primary care needs rehabilitation, investment, and much more public policy attention.