James> I think the concern is that a statement in Python may consist
James> of or begin with an expression and thus the leading keyword
James> alone is not enough to tell what is going on.
In my grammar proposal, I'm defining it that way: Any statement that
begins with "if" is an if-statement, not an if-expression treated
as a statement.
James> I am looking into this more closely to confirm but I don't
James> think it's a problem for the parser.
If you can find another way of doing it that's more general and/or
permissive, that's fine with me.
James> I expect that if you said something like:
James> if test: expr1 else: expr2
James> That would parse as an expression because of the LACK of newlines.
James> if test:
James> expr1
James> else:
James> expr2
James> Would be parsed as an if-statement, with expr1 and expr2 also
James> being seen as statements.
I'm skeptical that this is possible, but if you can figure out a way to
do it, that would be fine with me.