Please log in

or

Register now for free

or

Choose your profile *

Email *

A valid e-mail address. All e-mails from the system will be sent to this address. The e-mail address is not made public and will only be used if you wish to receive a new password or wish to receive certain news or notifications by e-mail.

Password *

Username *

Sign up to our newsletters

Higher education updates from the THE editorial team

World University Rankings news

Student newsletters

Send me special offers and marketing info from THE and selected partners

Cheats playing institutions against each other on appeal

Registrars and the student complaints ombudsman are backing calls for national
guidance on cheating and how to punish cheats.

The Academic Registrars Council has been urged to consider creating guidelines
for a sector-wide approach to penalising cheating students in a bid to reduce
the risk of inconsistent punishments being used as the basis for appeals.

Baroness Deech, head of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher
Education, added her voice to the plea from academic leaders at Swansea
University who claim to have won support from some ARC members. She said the
OIA might undertake a national survey of universities' policies on
cheating.

Swansea's call for national guidance comes as it faces appeals from some
members of a group of 30 Chinese business studies students accused of smuggling
notes into an exam. The students claim some are being dealt with more severely
than others.

Rhys Williams, Swansea's pro vice-chancellor academic, said: "We are concerned
that as students can now appeal to the OIA, they may try to play one
institution off against another, claiming their penalty was more severe than
another student's in a similar case in another institution.

"We do not want students to be able to use other institutions to strengthen
their appeals. We should all be singing from the same hymn sheet in choosing a
punishment to fit the crime."

Baroness Deech said: "A cross-sector view on what should be done where students
are found to be cheating would be enormously helpful. Some consistency is
urgently needed so I hope some guidelines can be put together as soon as
possible."

Brian Salter, secretary of the ARC and registrar at King's College London, said
plagiarism was one area where institutions' policies could be improved with a
clearer definition of what constituted cheating and how it should be handled.
But he warned: "What will probably emerge is that institutions will want to
deal with this in a way that suits their circumstances."

With student cheating cases apparently on the increase, there was a limit to
how much institutions could be expected to do, Mr Salter said. "We are
universities, not a police authority."