The video was reportedly taken on Sunday, provided to a journalist by a "commander in Homs".

By the end of the day, however, activists were claiming the discovery of footage, posted on a pro-regime YouTube channel months ago, that apparently had some of the images in the beheading video which emerged yesterday:

An observer who circulated the beheading video initially stood by the claim that it was taken on Saturday morning, but later he amended this from "sources", to say the incident occured on 22 October in the al-Khalidiyah district of Homs.

That "clarification" fits with the report of Zilal, an activist who is associated with the opposition CFDPC, that the images --- taken in October --- first appeared on a programme of Sama TV, a pro-regime television channel.

The heavily-edited video of the beheading is interspersed with scenes from a Turkish soap opera, apparently an attempt to link "crimes" of the Syrian insurgents with the evil behaviour of fictional Turkish characters. The film does not make much sense, but it does suggest hat someone filmed real beheadings and that footage was leaked to regime supporters.

Alternatively, the chosen clips from the October video may have been taken out of context, leaving the possibility that the men committing the acts do not fit the narrative of the "insurgents killing officers responsible for the Houla massacre".

More than 24 hours after yesterday's dramatic emergence of Boy Beheads Officers, there are more questions than answers. It illustrates two things: how easily misinformation can cloud aspects of the Syrian story, and how the reality on the ground is likely far more terrible than journalists can establish.