Gay people make up only 2 percent of the people in society. How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations?

I am aware that social conservatives are uncomfortable discussing genetic reasons, because it gives gay radicals an excuse to engage in sin. But acknowledging a genetic factor does not remove moral responsibility from gay people, and they remain under obligation to engage in Biblical sexual behavior. Gays will be put in the same situation as married men who are faithful to their wives, despite the fact that they are genetically inclined to be attracted to women that they are not married to.

Nobody can deny the fact that, despite gays being 2 percent of the entire population, they are heavily represented among the elites in America and other Western nations. Some men look more "manly" than other men, while some women look more "feminine" than other women. In the fashion industry, the latest trend in modelling are the androgynous men - a group of men who look so feminine, that they have successful careers as female models. These are not the Transgender men who get breast implants and inject themselves with female hormones. These are everyday guys who look so feminine, that they can just put on a wig and look exactly like women. One of the most famous is an Australian model known as Andrej Pejic, who let his hair grow long, and he models women's clothing. Here is a website showing the fashion magazines he has appeared in: http://andrejpejicofficial.com/gallery/

I suspect that these androgynous men have the ability to think like both men and women. This gives them an advantage in advancing their careers and building businesses. I love Free Republic, because it is a venue where manly men can talk about manly things, without being intimidated by the left. But how many Freeper men can work as interior decorators? How many can work as hair dressers? How many can design clothes? How many can become ballet dancers? How many can become Hollywood screen writers, who can write scripts for movies that can make women cry? How many can direct Broadway plays? These are career paths that can take a sissy man from a working class background, and put him in contact with rich and powerful people who help to make public policy.

Those "sissy" talents are also useful in "regular" jobs such as selling insurance policies. A regular "manly" man is able to understand the minds of men, and is able to sell to 50 percent of the population. Because the "sissy man" is able to understand the minds of 100 percent of the population, he can sell twice as much insurance, giving him a better chance of becoming CEO of the insurance company. Those "sissy" talents may also be helpful in getting senior clerical positions in churches, in politics, in the media, etc.

I’ve found that it depends on the industry. In a male-dominated industry with logical components such as IT, I find that manly men are seen as more intelligent, stable, and capable in their field.

In industries such as education, effeminate men have an advantage. The women who interview them relate to them on a different level than a gruff and tumbled man. I interviewed for jobs as an educator, but as a 6’2”, 350 lb. with a shaved head and goatee, I was generally seen as intimidating and hard than for the soft-hearted person I am. In general, women want to work with men they can manipulate (my wife has stated this on numerous occasions). Male managers, on the other hand, want a guy who can take the ball and run with it with little need for drama or education.

7
posted on 07/12/2013 10:35:07 AM PDT
by rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)

I think your theory is all wet. Single men don’t have to please a wife and can therefore devote all of their attention to their careers. Furthermore (if they llive with another guy) the salaries of the two of them (with no kids to support) can afford a nicer house and a fancier lifestyle, if that is what they want.

Moreover, I think that your categorization of “sissy” careers is ridiculous. I’ve known many “all male” hairdressers, for instance.

My niece told me about a phenomenon in college that she called “LUGs” (Lesbian Until Graduation)

The LUGs quickly found that being a lesbian carried a lot of advantages among professors who saw them as “brave” and tended to grade more easily. Housing was easier for them because no one wanted to risk being labeled homophobic or worse.

15
posted on 07/12/2013 10:40:35 AM PDT
by cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)

This is the point blank explaination why men “generally” make more in salary than women. No maternity leave, no “little Johnny’s sick so I have to stay home” or other excuses that require them to come late/leave early, or be absent all together.

Homosexuality is a developmental disorder. There is no homosexual gene. Genetically they are identical to heterosexuals. Not having to deal with women or children saves a lot of time and money they can devote to their careers.

Very plausible theory. At an Air base I worked out, the base commander was a Mormon. Pretty soon there was quite a few Mormon officers assigned to the base. This continued for several years because there was also a Mormon presence in the German Community. Like tends to promote like.

Might as well ask how did so many politically correct liberals get infiltrated into the corporate world such that they can drive gay pride advertising, the abortion agenda, open borders, global warming legislation, and “green” culture.

The Socialist fifth column has been on the march since the end of the WWII.

The LUGs quickly found that being a lesbian carried a lot of advantages among professors who saw them as brave and tended to grade more easily. Housing was easier for them because no one wanted to risk being labeled homophobic or worse.

Pfft! If you need these lame advantages to graduate from college these days, you're an idiot from the start.

I see kids graduating these days with poor writing skills and poor math skills. When I was in school, I had multiple professors who included spelling and grammar while grading your work even though the classes were not English or writing courses. I also had a professor who gave quizzes where your grade was either one-hundred percent or zero. He required us to calculate ALL answers to six decimal points. One digit off and you received a zero.

“How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations?”

Homosexuals have gained power in other societies throughout history. Homosexuals were the power elite in Sodom and Gomorrah, Rome at the time of the fall of the Roman Empire, Germany under the rule of the National Socialists and other civilizations.

When homosexuals gain disproportionate power and influence it is a sure sign that a society is decadent and corrupt.

Hello, Yehuda! I’ve noticed in recent years that the gays have dropped the gay gene lie. This came when it was suggested to them that it would increase abortions of gay guys. They dropped it like a hot potato.

I suspect that these androgynous men have the ability to think like both men and women. This gives them an advantage in advancing their careers and building businesses. I love Free Republic, because it is a venue where manly men can talk about manly things, without being intimidated by the left. But how many Freeper men can work as interior decorators? How many can work as hair dressers? How many can design clothes? How many can become ballet dancers? How many can become Hollywood screen writers, who can write scripts for movies that can make women cry? How many can direct Broadway plays? These are career paths that can take a sissy man from a working class background, and put him in contact with rich and powerful people who help to make public policy.

ROTFL! How many want to?

Those "sissy" talents are also useful in "regular" jobs such as selling insurance policies. A regular "manly" man is able to understand the minds of men, and is able to sell to 50 percent of the population. Because the "sissy man" is able to understand the minds of 100 percent of the population, he can sell twice as much insurance, giving him a better chance of becoming CEO of the insurance company. Those "sissy" talents may also be helpful in getting senior clerical positions in churches, in politics, in the media, etc.?

I think your argument has some serious flaws to work through.

42
posted on 07/12/2013 11:03:51 AM PDT
by Alex Murphy
("...Someone handed the keys to the Forum to the OPC and its sympathizers...")

Here is my guess as to what the "gay gene" benefit is: It messes with the wiring of the brain such that it increases intelligence as its primary trait, and causes homosexuality in some individuals as a side-effect.

While there are more male geniuses than females, there are also more men than women who are profoundly stupid.

The maladaptive reproductive effects of homosexuality may have been masked in the past by strong social pressures to appear heterosexual.

Gays with higher average intelligence were able to out-compete the bottom tier of men in resource acquisition and social climbing. Then they went against their desire and married women purely as a way of maintaining their social standing within the group.

And it was only recently that I realized how valuable a MARRIED man is to a hiring manager vs. a single man. Married men tend to be more stable and reliable as workers. As I was married just a year ago but in a monogamous relationship longer than that, my hiring manager saw me to be more stable than a recent divorcee and a recent college grad. He was probably right!

46
posted on 07/12/2013 11:07:41 AM PDT
by rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)

1. Fewer days lost due to sick children.
2. Well developed acting skills (also why so many in Hollywood) as they learned to hide by acting normal from an early age on.
3. Higher levels of sociopaths in positions of power, both because they tend to enjoy manipulating others and because they tend to make business decisions based on, well, business, rather than emotional connections to employees and customers.

50
posted on 07/12/2013 11:18:06 AM PDT
by null and void
(Republicans create the tools of oppression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.