"Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@jelks.nu> wrote:
>html-tidy@war-of-the-worlds.org wrote:
>> What possible reason would you have for empty tags? What are you trying to
>> style when there is nothing to style inside the tags?
> With DHTML (the DOM) you can add content.
Can't the empty tags be inserted themselves in the same manner relative to
the position of contentful markup (:before/:after)? AFAIK, the only tags
that make sense when empty are TD, TH (which can be made to render as
non-empty using CSS), and BODY. Even empty paragraphs make no sense in
HTML (how can you reasonably describe nothingness as a paragraph?) except
as a presentational abuse of HTML.
--
,=<#)-=# <http://www.war-of-the-worlds.org/>
,_--//--_,
_-~_-(####)-_~-_ "Did you see that Parkins boy's body in the tunnels?" "Just
(#>_--'~--~`--_<#) the photos. Worst thing I've ever seen; kid had no face."