After a long, fierce and exhausting debate over the 2014 city budget, council approved a proposed 1.42 per cent tax increase on Sunday.

The number was finally pushed through after council failed to pass the budget document late Saturday night and was forced yesterday to revisit two contentious budget changes: across-the-board staffing cuts and a reduction to the city’s reserve contributions.

Related Items

Polls

With their pencils still sharp, Stephen Montague (Richmond), Shawn Berry (Linden Lanes), Jeff Fawcett (Assiniboine), Len Isleifson (Riverview) and John LoRegio (Meadows) all shot down the initial 2.85 per cent increase presented to them on Saturday evening, forcing the third meeting.

The now-approved operating budget means a residential property assessed at $200,000 will see an increase in municipal taxes of $24.65 compared to 2013, however a public hearing on the budget will be held on March 17. The adoption of the city’s financial plan is scheduled for April 7.

After 14 hours of formal debate gave way to the approval, Mayor Shari Decter Hirst said there was a "different tone" during the election-year budget talks.

"It may be people seeing this as perhaps their last kick at the cat to impact the direction of the city and the priorities of the city," she said.

Council approved a $500,000 increase to core infrastructure projects such as roads, sidewalks and drainage bringing the city’s annual commitment to $1.5 million — a drop in the bucket, many suggested, to address the city’s multimillion-dollar infrastructure deficit.

Council spent hours debating small budget lines, such as getting rid of $8,000 for statutory holiday bus service, a reduction in luncheon expenses, reducing Christmas light expenses and contemplated various singular jobs in a number of departments.

"I think when we come to the budget and we talk about micro-managing and being the purveyors of the budget as we are elected officials, we have a responsibility," he said.

"If they want to call it micro-managing, guess what, I’m the biggest micro-manager there is," he continued. "Yes, I went after a lot of small things."

Montague put forward a dozen proposed changes to the document — of which most were cuts — including the $200,000 slash to city staff.

With this latest proposed cut, the city will have chopped $800,000 from its overall staffing budget in two years on budget days and both times the move has been criticized by some as a "shotgun" or "knee-jerk" approach.

Montague, who at the outset of this weekend’s debate was pushing for a zero per cent increase and was the sole councillor to vote against the budget, said he was still not satisfied with the budget pare-back.

"My issue is, spending is still increasing by almost $2.5 million, there’s still a 3.5 per cent growth dividend in this budget and we’re still taxing 1.42 per cent," he said.

Before the budget failed on Saturday night and some councillors were fighting to make staffing cuts, city manager Scott Hildebrand argued the cuts may "rip this whole organization apart."

However on Sunday after council agreed on the budget, he said he is "extremely happy" with the budget and agreed with council that the city has a staffing issue.

"I can’t do it all at once," he said. "You can’t make significant change all at once, it has to be strategically planned ... and this year will be more of a focus on those areas."

The bulk of the city’s expenses comes from protective services salaries which have been on a steady incline over the last decade and a continued financial thorn in council’s side.

Council managed to squeeze $100,000 out of the fire and emergency services budget specifically relating to overtime, but a proposal to cut the same amount from policing died on the floor.

The added level of bureaucracy brought by the Brandon Police Board — which oversees the operational budget of the Brandon Police Service — has added a challenge to culling police costs, however, Hildebrand is a board member and said the conversation to cut into police salaries has already started with board chair Mark Frison.

The union representing firefighters heads into arbitration in the spring demanding a 25 per cent increase over three years while the E-911 workers have already been to arbitration with a 34 per cent demand, but the final number has not yet been given to the city.

"Arbitration is going to be a struggle," Hildebrand said.

"Given the fact that you have the ability to raise taxes to your residents, the excuse that it’s not affordable is not there," he said. "To me, that’s a scary proposition because that absolutely ties our hands."

Again this year, Montague tried to slash funding to Renaissance Brandon — this time by $100,000 — and said he "is not happy with the board," however the cut was not passed and most councillors opted to keep the organization under a microscope since the province matches all municipal funds.

Over the next four years, the city will forgive a 20-year-old loan to the Riverbank Discovery Centre now worth $200,000 with the caveat that the freed-up funds will be used to redevelop the flood-ravaged river corridor.

In the newly drafted budget, the Western Manitoba Centennial Auditorium will get $200,000 for roof repairs, the struggling Safe and Warm program will get $10,000 in funding and the City of Brandon’s Affordable Housing Strategy will get additional manpower with a newly approved specialist position worth just under $50,000.

Further cuts to the 2014 budget include a $40,000 hit to the city’s legal fees associated with the human resources department to deal with union negotiations bringing that line to $60,000; a new $20,000 heritage reserve fund was eliminated; a $20,000 slash to the city’s "arts in the community" program was approved; and council cut $30,000 from the city’s downtown Christmas lighting.

The Wheat City Golf Course budgeted $200,000 for new golf carts this year, which was shot down by council in favour of $40,000 for new cart batteries instead.

This article has not yet been rated.

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

You can comment on most stories on brandonsun.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments.
All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.

There are no comments at the moment. Be the first to post a comment below.

Post Your Comment

Error

The following error(s) occurred:

You forgot to fill in the comment box.

confirm comment

The following is the comment that you have written. If you like what you have written, select the submit button and the comment will be sent to the Brandon Sun. If you would like to go back and edit your comment, select the edit button.

Comment

You have characters left

The Brandon Sun does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. Comments are moderated before publication. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

After a long, fierce and exhausting debate over the 2014 city budget, council approved a proposed 1.42 per cent tax increase on Sunday.

The number was finally pushed through after council failed to pass the budget document late Saturday night and was forced yesterday to revisit two contentious budget changes: across-the-board staffing cuts and a reduction to the city’s reserve contributions.

Please subscribe to view full article.

After a long, fierce and exhausting debate over the 2014 city budget, council approved a proposed 1.42 per cent tax increase on Sunday.

The number was finally pushed through after council failed to pass the budget document late Saturday night and was forced yesterday to revisit two contentious budget changes: across-the-board staffing cuts and a reduction to the city’s reserve contributions.

Subscription required to view full article.

A subscription to the Brandon Sun Newspaper is required to view this article. Please update your user information if you are already a newspaper subscriber.