I thought it might be useful to come up with a
kind of “Glossary
of Terms/Definitions”. It’s all very well rattling on about stuff,
but it’s
important that the Reader understands the “terms” and
“definitions” used …
otherwise the whole thing goes nowhere.

Let’s start at the beginning (usually the best
place …
Michael!)

There are a number of arenas called “Courts”.
Some of them
are Courts of Law, and most of them are not Courts of Law.

Those that are not Courts of Law, I call Star
Chambers
(which is what they really are). They are arenas where tyranny
runs wild.

They are: Magistrates
Courts, Country Courts, Crown Courts, and Higher Courts
(such as Queens
Bench Division and Chancery Division, as well as Central Criminal
Courts, such
as the Old Bailey). The Higher Courts tend to be Courts Of Appeal.

Then there are offences; “Summary only”, “Indictable
only”, and “Tryable
either way”.

And, finally, the two major (but utterly FAKE),
divisions: Criminal
and Civil.

Working backwards – there is – in point of FACT
– no such
thing as “Civil”.

There is either “Criminal” or nothing at all.

Civil

“Civil” is a construct, a Legal Fiction
manufacture, which
allows Legal Fictions into the mix. It was (obviously) designed
so that
CORORATIONS (Legal Fiction Persons) (Finance Companies/Banks)
could screw Legal
Fiction Persons (such as you), out of your home.
And so on.

It also means you (Legal Fiction Person) can
SUE another
Legal Fiction Person, for “defamation”, etc. However, to “defame
you”, is to “character
assassinate” you. Which is CRIMINAL, because you suffer injury
(to your reputation).
And, interestingly, libel cases are heard in CRIMINAL fashion …
by Juries! This
simply indicates that The Powers That Be (TPTB i.e. Idiots) have
blurred the
lines, in order to give the FAKERY of “Civil” some self-assumed
‘value’.

If you are sueing someone for "money owed",
then that's Theft (on their part), which is CRIMINAL ... unless
they did not owe it, in the first place.

“Civil” cases are heard in Country Courts (with Appeals to the Higher
Courts). Since they do
not deal with criminal matters, they deal with “nothing at all”
(see above).
There are, therefore, no real offences … it’s just
(fundamentally) “I say
this … he says that … who is right?”.
The cases will be labelled “Legal
Fiction Name .vs. Legal Fiction Name”.

County
Court

The County
Court
is an example of a Star Chamber. Cases are heard in a small
room, where
representatives of each party sit, facing each other. A
(so-called?) Judge sits
at the far end, usually behind a table placed at right angles
(“T-formation”).
The walls will be oak-pannelled, to act as a kind of “Faraday
Cage” … making
sure that The Truth never enters the Chamber.

Because, in a County
Court, “The Truth,
the Whole Truth,
and nothing but The Truth” … is utterly and entirely
IRRELEVANT. Which is
why no-one (neither side) takes any Oath to swear The Truth.
Computerised
garbage, and as much hearsay as possible, is taken as evidence,
as well as “We think …”,
“We say …”, “We
believe …”,
“We assert …” all
collected as
evidence, without a shred of any proof. Ask the Judge if they
can PROVE any of what
the other side says, and the Judge will airily wave away any
such request, and
continue on as a Rubber-Stamping Clown.

“Truth” doesn’t matter a damn. All that
matters is “interpretation”.
The Judge’s “interpretation”. YOU could interpret things
differently. So could
anyone else. But the Judge’s interpretation is the only things
that counts.

(So much for British Justice).

Criminal

Criminal is the only thing that is real, and
the only area
wherein there are defined OFFENCES … “Summary”
and “Indictable”. (“Tryable
either way” is explained below).

Crown
Court/Indictable Offences

A Crown
Court possesses
the ability to run Jury Trials, and process Indictable offences. In other words it has Common
Law jurisdiction.

Indictable
offences
are REAL offences (always covered by the Common Law, such as
Murder, Theft, Fraud,
Contempt of Court, Perverting the Course of Justice, Misconduct
in Public
Office).

All Indictable
criminal
cases take place “in the name of the Monarch” (because they are
considered to
be “in the public interest”), so they would be labelled “R .vs. Legal Fiction Name(s)” … “R” standing for
“Rex” (King) or “Regina”
(Queen).

However, to get the case into a Crown Court, TPTB (in the form of the Crown
Prosecution Service,
CPS) need to go through a Magistrates
Court first of all (dem’s de rools!). But, in the
Magistrates Court, this
is an automatic process, called “Committal
to Crown Court”. All the Magistrates Court does is try to
make sure that
there is some reason to pass the case onward … i.e. that someone
(CPS/Police) isn’t
simply taking the piss.

Magistrates
Court/Summary
Offences

A Magistrates
Court
does not possess Common Law jurisdiction (there is no Jury, nor
is there space
for a Jury). It is simply yet another version of a Star Chamber.
Once again, usually
surrounded in oak-pannelled walls, so as to prevent any Truth
from creeping
into the proceedings.

It is therefore bogus & fake, and is only
capable of
hearing bogus & fake “Summary”
offences, such as “Speeding”, “TV Licence”, etc. (Or “Tryable either way”, see below)

Conclusion
&
Plan of Action

“Tryable
either way”
offences means that they can be heard as “Summary”,
in a Magistrates Court
OR as “Indictable”
and heard in a Crown
Court. These are offences such as
“Assault”, etc.

I’ve explained the Chessboard, above. The
question is: “How do we
play it?” Well, my answer to
that is: “Aim for the Jury”.
They are
not 100%, but they are the best chance we have.

The problem is … TPTB DON’T WANT OUR
FREEMAN-ON-THE-LAND
STUFF in front of a Jury.

So, we need to fight to get it there. And the
rools are:

Everything
starts in a Magistrates
Court/Star Chamber.

The Magistrates Court
arena has the remit to submit Indictable offences
to Crown Court.

We must
make sure that the Magistrates
Court arena is fucked, when it comes to Summary offences,
because a Crown Court
wouldn’t touch them.

So, it comes down to (a) Always employ the
route to Crown
Court where it exists, and (b) Leave them fucked, when that
route doesn’t
exist.

And the Plan centres on the “Committal to Crown Court” procedure.

Now, in the case of Indictable
offences, the route to Crown
Court
is automatic.

In the case of “Tryable
either way” offences, we have to carve the route to Crown Court.

The Magistrates Court is a Star Chamber of
Arbitration. And “Arbitration”
i.e. to treat the offence as “Summary”,
requires “consent”. And the way they gain your consent is by the
TRICKERY of
asking you to plead “Guilty” or “Not Guilty”.

Whichever way you plead, you are saying “OK judge me, then”. And then they will find some
way of stitching
you up (even against all the odds). And you will come out
feeling as though you
have been taken to the cleaners – which is precisely what HAS
happened to you!

So, how do you stop that … and exercise the Crown Court route?

YOU DON’T PLEAD. You say: “There is no case
to answer”.

THIS WILL NOT, NECESSARILY, STOP THEM IN
THEIR MADNESS.
(They ARE mad, by any definition of ‘insanity’).

They may very well ignore you, and say they
will “Enter
a plea of Not Guilty on your behalf”.

This proves they are mad.

Because, if you say: “I have not granted you
Power of Attorney to
do that” … they DO stop … dead in their tracks … or
at least WILL stop …
sometime later … when they fully realise what you have said.

When the penny drops. When it dawns on them.

In the heat of the moment, at the time, they
may very well
carry on, and create a conviction there and then.

But that’s fine! That works in your favour!
That means you
have them bang to rights!

Bang to rights/Case closed … for a Private
Criminal Prosecution
against them for: Misconduct
in Public/Judicial
office, Abuse of Process, Perverting the Course of Justice, and Conspiracy to Defraud.

Instead of all those offences THEY committed,
they should
have run the “Committal
to Crown Court”
process if the offence was “Tryable,
either way”.

Actually you could tell them all that, in the
heat of the
moment. IT IS TRUE … and it is very likely that they would stop
and listen.

BECAUSE IT IS SOMETHING THAT HAD PROBABLY
NEVER OCCURRED TO
THEM BEFORE.

(And they would be starting to think how many
times they got
away with it in the past, because no-one realised it!).

(Note: This mechanism has a Track Record.
It SUCCEEDED in Carnarvon Magistrates Court, and I believe it
be why I succeeded in Southern Derbyshire Magistrates Court)

So, that deals with Indictable
and Tryable, either way
… what about
Summary?

Well … you apply the same technique as above.
Exactly the same.

Then … as far as I can see … I don’t know
what they are
going to do … they are stuffed.

Because they can’t move a Summary offence to Crown
Court … that kind of offence is far too ‘fake’.

If you won’t plead – and give them joinder –
and won’t grant
Power of Attorney –
and you point
out Misconduct in
Public/Judicial
office, Abuse of Process, Perverting the Course of Justice, and Conspiracy to Defraud
… and the Bill of Rights
1689 “THAT all
Promises and Grants of Fines and
Forfeitures before conviction are illegal and void” … and
“There
is no case to answer” … then what?

Dismissal … though lack of jurisdiction … is
the only thing
I can think of.

So,
you manage to get
it into Crown Court, what then?

First of all there will be a “Pleas & Case Management” Hearing, in front of
a Crown Court
Judge.

The Judge will decide whether or not to pass
it into a Jury
Trial.

If it is Freeman-on-the-Land stuff, then
EVERYONE will be on
your side … the Judge, the CPS Prosecution, and you.

Why? Because
the LAST
thing that the TPTB would want is for a Jury Verdict based on
Freeman-on-the-Land stuff!

So,
they will pull
out all the stops to prevent that happening, and the
likelihood is that the
Judge will dismiss the case.

Now,
returning to
Magistrates Courts, for a second

If all they can ever do is to “Commit to Crown Court” for Indictable
and Tryable either way
offences, and
if they have no option but to dismiss Summary
offences (through lack of Power of
Attorney) … it will soon be asked “What
the fuck are they doing, anyway?”.

Added to which, TPTB are already closing down
Magistrates Courts –
left, right,
centre - because they are “not profitable”.

That
will then give
us the leverage to demand a return to Grand Juries … which
worked for
centuries, before they fucked about.