You all clicked on the link to know what this great key to immortality is. But before we get to this matter, there is an important notion that we need
to understand.

This notion is called plastination.

Here is a definition of plastination : water and fat are replaced by certain plastics, yielding specimens that can be touched, do not smell or decay,
and even retain most properties of the original sample. [1]

Here are some exemple of plastination:

[2]

Now let's get to the Brain preservation subject. A man by the name of Kenneth Hayworth is pushing this plastination technique to the next level, on a
microscopic level. By preserving microscopic slices of every protein, neuron and sysnapse in your brain, Kenneth Hayworth hopes to store these slices
to reconstruct them later and bring back your consciousness at the same time.

This is how small they are going to make this plastination :

Here is how it is done (note that i do not possess the vocabulary to vulgarize this so i pasted it. All references will be at the end of the post ) :

" It involves preserving brain tissue with chemicals that prevent ice formation, followed by low-temperature storage in a "glass-like" state
(vitrification). Recent cryonics advances have allowed organ cryopreservation, thawing, and successful re-transplantation in small animals, bringing
this technology closer to its goal of reversible solid-state suspended animation. Each of these technologies, and other less sophisticated ones, such
as chemical fixation without plastic embedding, deserves to be carefully evaluated for its ability to preserve the critical structures of our brains,
an evaluation that has never before occurred for an entire human brain.

Fortunately, neuroscience is now identifying the synaptic structures that contain our unique memories and identity, and new electron microscopy (EM)
imaging techniques are allowing us to verify when these structures have been successfully preserved, from general synaptic connectivity all the way to
particular synaptic features, receptor distributions, and even the signal states (phosphorylation, methylation, etc.) of individual brain proteins."
[3]

Does this man have a solid background or is he making fantastical claims out of nowhere?

"he started his career by racking up a dozen or so patents at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. From there he headed for the University of Southern
California, where, as a grad student, he invented and patented a new kind of brain scanner. I could also mention that he's been working at Harvard
lately, researching the human brain's visual system." [4]

And here are the people working with him on this project at the brain preservation foundation:
(About 25 Authors,lecturers in that field of research all with Ph.D) www.brainpreservation.org...

Here is what brain preservation could bring to humanity :

1. For Science. High-fidelity brain preservation is a necessary step to an eventual Human Connectome Project, understanding the circuit-level
organization of human and other animal brains. Progress in connectomics, or plastinating and scanning human and other animal brains, will allow us a
much deeper understanding of healthy and disordered mental behavior, and may also help create significantly more intelligent and useful computers.

2. For Memory Donation. Brain preservation would appear to provide interested persons worldwide a means of preserving their memories and experiences.
Those who wish to leave behind such memories, for loved ones, descendants, or as a donation to culture would be able to do so, potentially very
inexpensively, and potentially to the great benefit of society. Neuroscience strongly suggests brain memories could be read by future technology
without revival of the individual, if revival were not desired, much as we read computer hard drives or archeological digs today.

3. For Continued Life. Brain preservation might provide a reliable means of avoiding death entirely and reaching the distant future. For those who
accept the hypothesis that they are encoded in their brain's unique physical structure and process, all evidence to date suggests this would work.
Furthermore, if general artificial intelligence emerges in this century, as many scholars expect, reanimation might occur not centuries, but mere
decades from now, while your friends and loved ones are still alive, and could personally benefit from your revival.

4. For the Future. Even for those unsure of the value of preservation, such a procedure could be desirable if it were inexpensive and reliable. Such
individuals might "leave it to the future" (future family, institutions, or society) to decide if memory or identity revival was desired, in their
individual case. With certain knowledge that one's life experiences and insights will otherwise disappear from the world, and comparatively few
resources necessary for plastination or cryonics, preservation for the possibility of future service to loved ones or society might be seen as a
particularly responsible and humble end-of-life decision.

For my part, i think that this discovery as the potential to completely change how we humans perceive and deal with death. Now is this technology only
going to be available to the elites of this world? probably. Can you Imagine a world where the 99% is being controlled by not only filthy rich but
immortal elites. Scary...

But it is always good to dream of the immortality of the mind!

Note that i fully understand that this science is in progress and has not yet achieved the recreation of the mind or brain by plastination.

This technique is amazing...my father took my girls to see this a few years ago, they were amazed by it. Never thought of it in the sense of
immortality. Seems like cryogenics may not be the end all, nasty freezer burn, it will be interesting to see it this technique will work and can be
reversed. S&F!!

Wow, that is pretty gruesome, yet still a better love story than Twilight.

My mum actually has volunteered to become one of these 'experiments', giving her body to young med students to do with what they please. Not sure
I'd be game to visit my mum if she was in this state though, although the nagging would be reduced!

(also, don't forget to use the ex-text tags when using other work from other sites)

This technique is amazing...my father took my girls to see this a few years ago, they were amazed by it. Never thought of it in the sense of
immortality. Seems like cryogenics may not be the end all, nasty freezer burn, it will be interesting to see it this technique will work and can be
reversed. S&F!!

Great! how old were your daughters when they saw the exhibition? I personally have nothing against it, the conservatives in my country diabolized it
but i think it is a great way to learn more about death. What did they have to say about it?

Now let's get to the Brain preservation subject. A man by the name of Kenneth Hayworth is pushing this plastination technique to the next level, on
a microscopic level. By preserving microscopic slices of every protein, neuron and sysnapse in your brain, Kenneth Hayworth hopes to store these
slices to reconstruct them later and bring back your consciousness at the same time.

Great, so his whole plan is predicated on the assumption that consciousness is "informatic". There are structual and philosophical problems with
that. First, if consciousness is informatic, then the information patterns that define consciousness would have to be recognizable in order for it to
be identified. But how would that be done? You have a situation of self-referential impredicativity. Such situations also give rise to irresolvable
paradoxes in the foundations of mathematics and logic.

Now let's get to the Brain preservation subject. A man by the name of Kenneth Hayworth is pushing this plastination technique to the next level, on
a microscopic level. By preserving microscopic slices of every protein, neuron and sysnapse in your brain, Kenneth Hayworth hopes to store these
slices to reconstruct them later and bring back your consciousness at the same time.

Great, so his whole plan is predicated on the assumption that consciousness is "informatic". There are structual and philosophical problems with
that. First, if consciousness is informatic, then the information patterns that define consciousness would have to be recognizable in order for it to
be identified. But how would that be done? You have a situation of self-referential impredicativity. Such situations also give rise to irresolvable
paradoxes in the foundations of mathematics and logic.

If consciousness is indeed information stored in the brain i do not see how patterns of consciousness have to be identified or recognized for it to
work. They are simply pressing pause on the whole system. The only way i can see this not working is If consciousness is not part of the system (does
not originate from the brain) or found in units smaller than neurons or synapses (therefore lost in the process). Hope this answer makes sense.

I dont think brain can survive this procedure. The only way to revive a frozen person would be to scan their brain on a microscopic level and then
reconstruct and simulate it in a computer. Essentialy, we need mature mind uploading for revival.

Ok, I've seen this "Plastinate your brain for immortality!" meme shooting around alot lately and it's just an awful idea all around. The idea of
memory preservation is laughable at best for two very important reasons 1) the mind and memory seem to rely on MUCH more than the patterns of neural
branching and synaptic potentiation. In fact, most of the evidence now points to the mind's physical substrate being a combination of electrochemical
and quantum mechanical. (In fact some recent work on memory shows the specific mechanism through which the two systems transduce information between
each other for transmission at the synapse). The kind of resolution this sort of procedure needs, at MINIMUM, is at the molecular scale, and perhaps
MUCH smaller than that, not to mention the time dependent aspects of the maintainence of Mind as an operative mode.

What these guys are talking about is taking a JPEG of a page of War and Peace, dropping the resolution to 8 pixels square and calling the result
"Russian literature". Maybe -- MAYBE -- they could pull some traces of memories. But, do you really want to leave a jaggy, cragged version of bits of
your mind to science?

And the second reason this is a laughable idea is that the scientists who've been pushing this idea have GOT to know all this stuff. I'm just a
well-read layman. Which basically means it's all a great big PR scam to get brains for science. And that's HILARIOUS!

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.