Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> writes:
> [CC'ed Thomas Bushnell, since he has filed an ITA on gwrapguile]
>
> cascardo@minaslivre.org writes:
>
>> Please, check the following bugs, rename or close them, however you prefer.
>>
>>
>> 1) #242467: ITA: gwrapguile -- Tool for exporting C libraries into...
>>
>> 2) #263127: O: gwrapguile -- g-wrap: Tool for exporting C...
>>
> I prefer to have them open until GnuCash is built against G-Wrap 1.9.3
> and the gwrapguile source package can be removed.
I have, rather, taken over maintenance of the 1.3.4 gwrapguile package.
I am not interested in maintaining a gnucash linked or built with
guile-2 versions of things that are not supported by upstream. (I am
correct, right, that the g-wrap to which you refer is a guile 2
thingie?)
gnucash is a guile-1 program. Many people think that every package
should migrate to guile-2. They are right. The upstream gnucash
developers are working on this as fast as they can.
Thomas