Related Links

Cape Town – They may well finish beneath the two strong
coastal powers, the Stormers and Sharks, but the Bulls quite possibly hold the
key that will determine which side eventually tops the South African conference
in Super Rugby 2013.

There is a widespread belief among critics – a view shared
by this writer – that either of the Cape Town or Durban-based outfits, with
their impressive, respective strength in depth, will probably “rule the pool”
in SA terms.

For the record, my No 1 tip for conference supremacy is
again for the Stormers, who have become experts at grinding out wins in tight
ordinary-season contests, thus making it a hat-trick of successes for them in
that regard, even if the much more coveted main prize continues to elude the
men from Newlands.

It could be a desperately close battle, and even if the
Sharks do end conference runners-up again, they will take comfort from the fact
that they went further in 2012 – to the final against first-time champions the
Chiefs, although their route there involved a particularly debilitating amount
of late-campaign travel.

Make no mistake, the Sharks, with their multi-pronged and
up-tempo brand of rugby, also have an excellent chance of bossing the South
African table, come the final day of ordinary-season play on July 13.

Over the past few days, my own mind has yo-yoed agonisingly
over which of the Stormers or Sharks will head the SA pack – to the point that
when news broke of the Stormers’ Springbok lock phenomenon Eben Etzebeth being
ruled out of all three stiff, important early hurdles against the Bulls, Sharks
and Chiefs, I began to lean a fraction back toward the Sharks.

But then it emerged from the Durban camp that captain and
livewire loose forward Keegan Daniel was also going to be sidelined for a few
weeks, and that Bismarck du Plessis, probably the planet’s top hooker, might
only see first action in 2013 after the midway mark of the competition.

The abrasive, team-inspiring qualities of Du Plessis are
well documented, and he is also a strong factor in wrenching possession off
opposition ball-carriers, such is his rare upper-body strength.

But the Daniel setback is also not to be dismissed too
lightly, despite the Sharks’ pretty good barrel of “loosie” options: he is a
vital cog in their attacking game, with his stealth, diminutiveness, eye for a
gap and cleverness in the off-load.

Across the park, the Stormers and Sharks mostly boast
impressive “second choices” in the various positions – it is probably not an
exaggeration to say that their imaginary B-sides would prove stronger in Super
Rugby this season than, say, the first teams of the Force, Rebels and Kings and
perhaps even a few others.

It will be interesting to see whether the arrival of loan
signing Franco van der Merwe remedies the Sharks’ long-time lineout woes, while
the success or otherwise of another Lions-based temporary recruit, flyhalf
Elton Jantjies, in his posting to Cape Town, may also go a long way to
determining whether the Stormers truly prosper.

Perhaps Jantjies’s biggest challenge will be to fit in
seamlessly with the Stormers’ heavy emphasis on rock-like defence; if he finds
that problematic in his key channel, expect near-veteran Peter Grant (once
returned from Japan) to get more game-time for the Stormers than some may
anticipate at this point.

What of the Bulls? Just because I again cannot see fit to
include them among the top two in the conference, doesn’t mean I am writing off
their challenge – far from it, in fact.

I do see them as fair enough bets to make the playoffs cut
as a possible third SA presence among the six qualifiers, remembering that
there has to be room for at least one Australian presence under tournament
stipulations.

So an only snag counting against the side from Loftus,
perhaps, will be the likelihood that New Zealand will also target getting three
teams through the funnel – all of the Chiefs, Crusaders and reawakening
Highlanders doubtless fancy a crack at that.

Still, the Bulls will be particularly good choices as dark
horses if the endeavours of some of their gnarly, senior troops are matched by
big first-class breakthrough seasons from the likes of Jan Serfontein or Arno
Botha.

And they may also be the ace “spoilers” of the conference –
both the Sharks and Stormers are likely to go into their pair of derbies
against them with some trepidation, regardless of how any of the trio of sides
are faring at the time.

Last season, for instance, the Stormers downed the Bulls on
each occasion by a whisker, whilst the Bulls knocked over the Sharks at Loftus in
round one (although they were later soundly beaten 32-10 in Durban, by way of
Sharks revenge).

If the Cheetahs have “heartbeat” customers like Coenie
Oosthuizen and Heinrich Brussow available more often than not, they should have
enough artillery to force controversial newcomers the Kings into the
wooden-spoon berth on the SA ladder, forcing the Eastern Cape side into
promotion/relegation activity against the Lions later in the year.

But allow me to warn this, with some measure of conviction:
if the Cheetahs become dogged with injuries to core personnel it is not
impossible that the Kings, steered by the strategic wiles of director of rugby
Alan Solomons and assuming that they are able to be at fullest strength
themselves often enough, will have a sniff at ending fourth in the group!

An overall title pick? Hmm, it seems particularly tough to
separate the best sides this year, although I have a niggling little hunch –
hopefully an irrational one – that the trophy will stay in New Zealand despite many
seriously optimistic South African beliefs to the contrary.

More In This Category

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.