O Abdurrahmaan al-A’dani***I am not extreme, whereas you may disparage meAs well I have retracted from the expression*** (The Imaam of Mankind and Jinn in Yemen)1Likewise retract too and announce it***….(to the end of the poetry)1

This retraction was just posted on the website Aloloom in the year 2008 let alone that the brother retracted from his exaggeration of praise for ash-Shaykh Yahya before the year-2008 however the fanatics are now bringing this up to prove that Shaykh Yahya is a Hadaadee, subhaanallah this is clear oppression and transgression!!!1

Recently, the brother Abu Khadijah said in his post on Salafitalk.com in which he defamed Shaikh Yahya, “A man in which they see no wrong, the one whom they regard to be the “Imaam ath-Thaqalain” (the Imaam of Mankind and Jinn!) in their exaggerated praise which he does not forbid.”
This is completely unjust for Abu Khadijah to attach this statement to the students of the Shaikh after the one who said it retracted from this statement years ago. Also he continued on by saying that Shaikh Yahya doesn’t forbid this. Below is some of the kalaam of the Shaikh showing his disapproval of this kind exaggeration in praise for him.

“For me is a urgent request from my brothers، I hope that they obey this request, InshaAllah I have a good opinion of them. It (the request) is that they don’t allow our love for each other to make them exaggerate (in praise). JazakAllahu khairan. I swear by Allah that verily I hate with my heart the likes of this exaggeration.”

So, brothers it was inappropriate for Abu Khadijah to throw a low blow like this especially when this was posted days before he even replied. As can be found in the following post:

Yaa Akhaana Alee what do you expect from the students of Faalih Bin Naafi’ Al Harabee have you forgotten about Al-Fawaariq Yaa Abaa Hakeem??? Do we now still hold that against you??? Fear Allah and have justice even if you regard us and Ash-Shaykh Yahya as your enemies

Yea, that was a complete exposure, why? Because he had come to a conference and the brothers asked him “were these claims true that had been made against you by the brothers in aloloom?” so he denied everything, then he said I am going to speak about it in my lecture, so he was the next one to deliver a lecture in the conference and guess what, you got it right – no mention of it whatsoever, ‘Ayb ‘Alayk Yaa Abaa Hakeem

As for the Ghuloo (extremism and exaggerations) that occurs concerning him then there is much to narrate concerning that (such that will amaze you, like him being described as:) “Imaam uth-Thaqalain” (the Imaam of mankind and the Jinn!) or ‘If one were to touch and wipe his sandles (in exoneration of him) until such and such a time he would still not have been given his due right!’ and other examples of speech that ones ears will detest hearing! (such as) “If he were to be melted then his flesh would become Sunnah!” Or “(His flesh would become) verses from the eternal book!” And other than this!

The amazing thing is that they say that you people listen to the traitors/slanderers and we have heard this in recordings from them with their voices, and we have read this in some of their published books. In particular, the book that was written by Abdul Hameed Al-Hajoori concerning treachery in the da’wah this poetry is present within it.

Reality:

I looked into the book of Shaikh Abdul Hameed Al Haajori which is available on his website:

And between pages 211-215 it contains some poetry written by brother Ahmad Ibn Muhammad Ibn Hussein Al Haajori. One is related to deception in the da’wah and the other related to a biography of Shaikh Yahya.

I would like to know where in these two poems in the book contain such exaggerations? And please point out the name of the poem and in which lines such exaggerations occur since it was said:

اقتباس:

In particular, the book that was written by Abdul Hameed Al-Hajoori concerning treachery in the da’wah this poetry is present within it

This was simply a reality check for those who are relying upon the speech of Salafi Publications. This is one instance from the many instances where their speech contains discrepancies. And where they have taken the speech of others without verifying whether it is true or not.