If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Please note that certain things cannot be posted in the Celebs forum:

Pictures or videos taken while the celebrity still was/is under the age of 18.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by Sinestro

^ But then again you're also using the store as definitive proof that he isn't. There are many gay men who are still into hunting and the like and that wouldn't stop them from using that store. Then again we don't know anything. So I'll just let everyone think what they will, though they're all cute

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by billie

Even i dont like their music i had a big big crush on Joe when he was like 19. He was damn cute. Now, he is still cute but he hasnt the same charm as back days.

I don't follow their music either. I don't own anything by the Jonai as a group nor NJ or JJ solo. I've caught a couple of "Jonas L.A." eps on Disney but other than that, nothing. Not even those ridiculous "Camp Rock" movies. But how can you say JJ isn't more charming now than he was 4-5 years ago?? He's sooooo much hotter now!! His latest "scruffy puppy" look he's got going on lately, I'm not too crazy about but when he cleans up a bit...sweeeeet!! JJ is hot, period!!

this pic is from 2009, I think, and I think it's super hot:

summer of 2011:

"Don't wait for the world to be ready. Find what you're looking for."Joey Graceffa

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by MJEH89

I don't follow their music either. I don't own anything by the Jonai as a group nor NJ or JJ solo. I've caught a couple of "Jonas L.A." eps on Disney but other than that, nothing. Not even those ridiculous "Camp Rock" movies. But how can you say JJ isn't more charming now than he was 4-5 years ago?? He's sooooo much hotter now!! His latest "scruffy puppy" look he's got going on lately, I'm not too crazy about but when he cleans up a bit...sweeeeet!! JJ is hot, period!!

this pic is from 2009, I think, and I think it's super hot:

summer of 2011:

He looks so serious these days and, in my opinion, that beard doesnt suit him so much. It makes him look older.
However, back days, he looked so yummy, i liked how his old hair suited him

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Blind Gossip

Lies and Trying Times

"He actually went home for Christmas. He spent a few pleasant days with his family, golfing and skiing and opening presents and enjoying family dinners.

But he won’t be sticking around. He’s going to hop on a plane early next week and go play around Europe. By play, we mean hang out with his girlfriend (a bland girl who he doesn’t realize is totally using him to promote her product), drink until he is blackout drunk, and do enough cocaine and heroin to kill the average person.

And, yes, his family knows about his problem. They have been trying, asking, begging, and demanding him to get help. None of it has worked. They had made arrangements to get him into rehab right after Christmas, so that could spend a month away from all the bad influences in his life, and be healthy for his upcoming tour. He lies and says that he is not using. He says that there is nothing wrong with him and that he doesn’t need to go to rehab. And, because he is an adult, no one can force him to go.

These are trying times for the family. They are supposed to be in the studio this month, working on an album and getting ready for next month’s tour. Instead of doing either, he is taking off, leaving his family and his team in the dust so that he can go party some more. They are furious that he is letting him down. They are also scared that they will get the call one day that he has overdosed in some hotel room in Europe."

the general consensus is going with Joe on this one.

"Don't wait for the world to be ready. Find what you're looking for."Joey Graceffa

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

"He actually went home for Christmas. He spent a few pleasant days with his family, golfing and skiing and opening presents and enjoying family dinners.

But he won’t be sticking around. He’s going to hop on a plane early next week and go play around Europe. By play, we mean hang out with his girlfriend (a bland girl who he doesn’t realize is totally using him to promote her product), drink until he is blackout drunk, and do enough cocaine and heroin to kill the average person.

And, yes, his family knows about his problem. They have been trying, asking, begging, and demanding him to get help. None of it has worked. They had made arrangements to get him into rehab right after Christmas, so that could spend a month away from all the bad influences in his life, and be healthy for his upcoming tour. He lies and says that he is not using. He says that there is nothing wrong with him and that he doesn’t need to go to rehab. And, because he is an adult, no one can force him to go.

These are trying times for the family. They are supposed to be in the studio this month, working on an album and getting ready for next month’s tour. Instead of doing either, he is taking off, leaving his family and his team in the dust so that he can go party some more. They are furious that he is letting him down. They are also scared that they will get the call one day that he has overdosed in some hotel room in Europe."

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

I think the blind item is about Joe Jonas. If you've followed previous blind items they seem to fit him better than Bieber. I hope and pray that it's not true or not as bad as claimed. I don't want to hear terrible news that he has overdosed and died.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

I have a question about these "Blind Items". Are they even true?? I mean, if it were really true, wouldn't they just come out with the names of the celebs/people in question? I thought they always kept it "blind" and nebulous because they were just made up stuff for gossip, and they didn't want to use real names due to possibly being sued for libel.

I always thought they were mainly gossipy fabrications. Confirmation, anyone??

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by dereperez

I have a question about these "Blind Items". Are they even true?? I mean, if it were really true, wouldn't they just come out with the names of the celebs/people in question? I thought they always kept it "blind" and nebulous because they were just made up stuff for gossip, and they didn't want to use real names due to possibly being sued for libel.

I always thought they were mainly gossipy fabrications. Confirmation, anyone??

Blind items and its veracity depends on the source of the blind. Some are very true, some are very false.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by dereperez

Doesn't sound like it'd be something Joe would do though. At least not to the degree that the blind item (and past ones) is suggesting.

Well, the great falsehood of celebrity is the illusion that we "know" them. We know what the celebrity or handlers want to project, what others in their circle or those encountering them might say, or a feeling or conclusion we might intuit about their personalities by piecing together different parts of data. Not saying this blind item is the least bit true, or it's even about him - but in general terms, Joe could be the sweetest and most wholesome guy around, but he could also be a massive douchebag with a host of problems or coping mechanisms; we just don't know. I saw "Flight" (with Denzel Washington) the other day and was just thinking about how it effectively dramatizes how someone can be an addict and a "high-functioning" one at that.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Oh i know that celebs can paint whatever public picture they want of themselves, or what the media wants to project. I'm just saying I would be a bit surprised based on what I "know" of him...but I know it's totally possible that the blind item could be true. I know it's not impossible.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by dereperez

I have a question about these "Blind Items". Are they even true?? I mean, if it were really true, wouldn't they just come out with the names of the celebs/people in question? I thought they always kept it "blind" and nebulous because they were just made up stuff for gossip, and they didn't want to use real names due to possibly being sued for libel.

I always thought they were mainly gossipy fabrications. Confirmation, anyone??

I don't put any faith in any blind items. This one in particular sounds like it was written exactly so people would be able to guess who it was. With no names, no facts and no sources, anyone can write anything and claim it to be truth when it's completely made up garbage. It's just a loophole for people to use vicious slander, or for bored celebrity stalkers to make up fantasies. I suppose it's possible there is sometimes truth to some of them. But I'm guessing the 'true' blind items are more likely 1 in 100.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

I feel so sorry for JJ and NJ for this bullshit "they were rude to us" thing. Now the guys feel they need to do damage control. Fuck it!! They don't NEED to do damage control!! they didn't do anything wrong. they're just fine.

JJ yesterday in NYC:

"Don't wait for the world to be ready. Find what you're looking for."Joey Graceffa

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Blind items probably tend to have much more truth in them than not... Hollywood has a lot of "open secrets" that publicists just want to keep out of the way if they can, lest they cast an unwanted glare into the personal life or image or marketability of the big celebrities and public personalities(politics, business, fashion and the like). Whether it's who's gay/bi... who's a lush, who's cheating with everyone, who's nasty to everyone, who's a druggie, etc.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by Sausy

Blind items probably tend to have much more truth in them than not... Hollywood has a lot of "open secrets" that publicists just want to keep out of the way if they can, lest they cast an unwanted glare into the personal life or image or marketability of the big celebrities and public personalities(politics, business, fashion and the like). Whether it's who's gay/bi... who's a lush, who's cheating with everyone, who's nasty to everyone, who's a druggie, etc.

Actually blind items tend to be the least reliable. They aren't based in fact and therefore have to be blind items or risk a libel lawsuit. If someone is speaking based on actual factual information, even if it is their own opinion they are offered a bit more protection under the law. The whole point of the "blind item" is that it is legally ambiguous, no specific person is named as the target, therefore no specific person has grounds to sue. If there was any possible evidence to give any credence to the rumor it wouldn't need to be blind.

Blinds can be VERY reliable, but it depends on the source of the blind. Some sources are for pure entertainment value and are usually not true but, Perez Hilton, Blind Gossip and Ted C had many very true blinds.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Blinds can be VERY reliable, but it depends on the source of the blind. Some sources are for pure entertainment value and are usually not true but, Perez Hilton, Blind Gossip and Ted C had many very true blinds.

Before the digital age there was this saying: Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Another thing about blind items is that afterward one can say they were about someone different than originally meant. Easy to claim one was right under those circumstances.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by MJEH89

some recent pix of a sexy guy named Joe...

Holy fuck! I really haven't been paying much attention the last year. When did my hottie Joe get so fugly! He looks like he is on the road to bringing back "heroin chic". And Nick is suddenly the HOTTEST MAN ALIVE!

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

What has always fascinated me about the Jonai are their uncanny ability to show their shit off; ass, bulge, body and be completely innocent about it. They claim to be good little christian boys, yet they intentionally hype and sell their sex appeal like prostitutes. I love it when pictures of them surface and they all are sporting massive bulges yet people carry on like it's nothing. Just once I would like to see a genuine article in People magazine or something that specifically just focuses on their bulges that are so prominently featured in the photos.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Just once I would like to see a genuine article in People magazine or something that specifically just focuses on their bulges that are so prominently featured in the photos.

They HAVE been called out before. I recall a segment on Watch What Happens Live where Kevin is forced to play a game with Lance Bass called Guess That Jon-Ass. That was quite hilarious. Kevin didn't even pretend to be creeped out by it b/c he KNOWS what they're audience likes from them. Another instance (on the same show) is when Nick Jonas appeared and he is shown a video that a Jonas fan made of him grabbing his junk. He thought it was slightly creepy to know that ppl would do that but otherwise he KNOWS that his ass and bulge are worshipped by girls/gays.

Re: Joe Jonas [merged] thread

Originally Posted by dereperez

He let himself go somewhere around the summer...and has never returned.

Originally Posted by bedshaped85

I can't even open this thread w/o fearing the worst. Hard to believe its the same Joe I wanted in the 2010/11 era when he was transforming from a cute boy into a sexy man. Anyone else notice how in more recent pics he is seen bulging his eyes out or making crazy faces at the camera. Its strange to be honest.

y'all need to quit picking on my Joe!!! i'm actually starting to get (kind of) used to the thicker hair. yes, i like the shorter hair, too, but JJ still looks sexy, imho...

JJ over the last few days - New Orleans...Los Angeles:

"Don't wait for the world to be ready. Find what you're looking for."Joey Graceffa