Saturday, 5 August 2017

An embellishment that became a mutualism: Inquiries on male bee tibial bouquets and fragrance-producing orchids in Panama and oceanic islands (Apidae: Apinae, Euglossini; Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae)☆

Flora
Volume 232, July 2017, Pages 117-127
Flora
. Author links open the author workspace.David W.Roubika. Numbers and letters correspond to the affiliation list. Click to expose these in author workspaceOpens the author workspace1. Numbers and letters correspond to the affiliation list. Click to expose these in author workspaceOpens the author workspace. Author links open the author workspace.Jette T.Knudsenb. Numbers and letters correspond to the affiliation list. Click to expose these in author workspace2. Numbers and letters correspond to the affiliation list. Click to expose these in author workspace
a
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Ancon, Panama
b
Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden
Received 15 May 2016, Revised 1 November 2016, Accepted 19 November 2016, Available online 22 November 2016.
Edited by Stefan Dötterl
crossmark-logo
Show less
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2016.11.012Get rights and content
Highlights
•
Odors of pollinating male orchid bees and fragrance host orchids reflect isolation.
•
Mating “bouquets” of male Euglossa contain fewer chemicals on islands.
•
Reduced interspecific mating interference may produce reduced species-specific odor bouquets.
•
Most components of bee odors and orchid fragrances are rare among individuals.
•
Benzenoids absent in orchids are major components of Euglossa mating bouquets.
Abstract
We used comparative studies to investigate how and why floral and bee fragrances evolve, including courtship odors collected by male Euglossa mixta to form their “tibial bouquet”, on Coiba Island and other Panama forests. Fragrances of four orchid genera, two used extensively by E. mixta – Coryanthes and Mormodes – and two never used, Clowesia and Catasetum – were also analyzed. From among 636 chemicals in 93 male tibiae, 66 were also found in 30 floral head-space samples of orchids, in which 315 total volatile compounds were detected. Geographic variation was noteworthy in E. mixta, but no significant difference was found between mainland and island populations. The aromatic benzenoids methyl salicylate, 2-hydroxy-6-nona-1,3-dienylbenzaldehyde (HNDB), and the monoterpene 1,8 cineole, nearly always occurred. Coryanthes or other orchids produce two of the chemicals, but no source of HNDB is known. No statistical evidence was found of bee preference for orchids with bouquets like those formed in bee hindlegs, yet Coryanthes and Mormodes produced the most monoterpenes and more resembled the bees, when compared to Catasetum and Clowesia. Coiba bee tibial bouquets averaged 56% as diverse as on mainland and Coiba has <50% the euglossine species of nearby mainland, but lacks those most similar to E. mixta, both in phylogeny and tibial bouquet. Coiba’s diverse rain forest should contain many volatiles the bees seek. Because odor collection and production are costly, our findings strengthen hypotheses that odors are used to avoid interspecific reproductive interference. Despite finding large differences in the same orchid species, we do not know whether isolation of between 107 and 104 years produced differentiation. Fragrances seem analogous among orchids and bees, thus may lessen interspecific interference or competition, and promote outcrossing or favor embellishments, via female choice. Such adaptive reasons for fragrance variation within bee or orchid populations remain largely untested.
Graphical abstract
Male Eulaema meriana visiting and collecting fragrances from the flower of Gloxinia, in Colón Province, Panama. Photo: D.W. Roubik. This is an example of a non-orchid fragrance S. Vogel documented for euglossine male bees elsewhere.
Unlabelled figure
Download high-res image (161KB)Download full-size image
Keywords
Coiba Islandfragrance analysispollinationreproductive interferenceEuglossaCoryanthes