An exploration in sociopathy

Menu

Tag Archives: eloi

First — it is now possible to objectively/scientifically recognize psychopaths (which will, I’m convinced, support Martha Stout’s cited estimate of 4% or 1 in 25 being a psychopath, ((K. Barry et al. (1997), R. Bland, S. Newman, H. Orn (1988), J. Samuels et al. (1994)), and my anecdotal agreement (from recognizing psychopaths waiting for the subway, at street corners, in the workplace, etc.). Second — their unhappy response to this, i.e., their machinations to seize power over the rest of us – political, economic, and through the surveillance built into the internet of things of great utility and convenience. Surveillance that can close like a vise on any chosen target. We carry our own handcuffs with us.

“If you want a vision of the future, imagineabootstampingon a human face – forever.” – George Orwell. The Fabian, George Orwell, was a psychopath writing how-to books, as was Aldous Huxley also. H.G. Wells of The Time Machine with the Eloi and Morlocks was also a Fabian and a psychopath. The books seem to understand our plight from our own standpoint but only because psychopaths have something called “cold empathy.” They know exactly how their targets will experience their attacks, it helps them ‘twist the stiletto’.

Think what 1 in 25 being psychopaths mean. It means that for every group of 25 that you’ve ever known, there was probably one psychopath. It means we all walk shoulder to shoulder everyday with psychopathic beings who have zero fellow human feelings, emotionless, guiltless beings who see our emotional responses as weakness and know how to use them against us.

Regarding Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, would you say his looks are odd? His eyes strange? Would you say, or understand why someone else might describe his eyes as flat or shallow? Would you say, or understand why someone else might say there was no soul behind his eyes? Would you say, or understand why someone else might say the phrase, ‘the lights are on, but nobody is home”? Does he seem arrogant to you? Almost emotionless? Personality-less?

Any ‘yes’, means you are on the way. That’s how recognizing psychopaths start.

Is Mark Zuckerberg’s wardrobe that of a genius… or psychopath?

Please note, Facebook has just shut down Alex Jones Infowars’ sites and Venezuelan sites. It doesn’t matter what you think of these sites, next time it could be you. The war begins.

What?? What’s that voice in the back? “You’re wrong. Mark is simply a nice Jewish boy!” Ah. . . . No, you are the one who’s wrong. The reason you think that, is due to psychopathy being another genetic disorder carried in higher percentages in the Ashkenazi population. Plain and simple. It is not anti-Semitism to note this. In fact it should be freeing. When a young person suddenly realizes that a parent is a psychopath, they are suddenly freed from the dictates of the parent/child power relationship, and can proceed to explore life unhindered by the anchor of the psychopathic parent.

In nature, this refers to prey animals not being able to recognize predators. When wolves were reintroduced to Yellow Stone the elk were not able at first to recognize them as a danger. Animals isolated on islands, are famous for this syndrome and often are not able to change fast enough, for example, the flightless pigeon, the Dodo, which sailors could just walk up to and hit on the head.

We are all raised to be naive prey of psychopaths. Everyone is told the fairytale that we are all brothers and sisters under the skin. But what if that is not so? And it is not. Believe me, psychopaths believe we are all idiots for not recognizing them.

On top of that, the human female starts out as genetically inclined to be naive prey to psychopaths. Male psychopaths have evolved to evoke genetically determined instincts (mothering and caring-of-a-child instincts) in women, I believe. Life can teach them otherwise, as attested in the survivor blogs. However, all men need to be aware of the female propensity to be naive regarding psychopaths, it might prevent traumatic shock. The truth is, you can’t save Weena.

From a later comment:

Here’s an account of early firearm buffalo hunts. I can’t vouch for its historical/biological accuracy, but it does convey a message. It goes like this, 1) the buffalo of the time didn’t and couldn’t recognize guns and gunshots as being dangerous (naive prey syndrome), 2) buffalo herds follow a dominant female, with a pecking order. So the hunter would lie down in some kind of blind, maybe just behind a log. Experienced hunters would know how to recognize the dominant female. So he would target that one. The others couldn’t fathom what had happened and couldn’t act on their own without a herd leader. Then the next in line dominant female would step up to be herd leader. Then she was shot, and the process continued over and over again, with the herd never panicking. The hunter wouldn’t ever have to move. “HEY, what happened to Martha? And Ethel? What the hay?? Dunno, just keep eating that grass, munch, munch, munch. Wow, that’s some delicious grass!” https://pathwhisperer.info/2018/05/07/annoying-neighborhood-psychopaths-and-anomalous-occurrences/#comment-139279

Meta

Contact/Copyright/Disclaimer

All material copyrighted 2017.
Nonprofit internet use allowed with proper credit.
For nonprofit published or for profit use please contact me.
"Path Whisperer" and "pathwhisperer" trademarked.

This blog advances opinions, not statements of scientific certainties. All outside commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments. If included in the blog they are presented as the commenters' own opinions only.