Market Summary

INDICES

Resource Commodities

Name

Last

Change

Gold

1305.49

0.92%

Silver

16.68

1.38%

Copper

3.06

0.060

Platinum

912.49

0.71%

Oil

71.84

0.50%

Natural Gas

2.91

0.21%

Uranium

22.88

0.00%

Zinc

1.38

0.00%

Johnson Camp Mine

After having closed the second tranche of a non-brokered private placement on January 22, 2018, Excelsior Mining (MIN.TO, EXMGF.US) raised an impressive total of US$30M. Strong features of this round were the absence of warrants, and the fact it was oversubscribed, as Excelsior initially was looking for US20.2M, and ended up with US$30M. Another strong achievement for me was the ability to do this raise before the very important UIC permit was granted, this is a strong vote of confidence for the permitting process, despite the small delay, more on this later. On the other hand, something not impressing me that much was the share price of C$1.00. When looking at the chart, it was obvious that certain parties liked to get in on the cheap, as soon as word got out that management was raising cash:

Share price MIN.TO, 1 year time period; source tmxmoney.com

The share price was walked down professionally from C$1.25 to C$1.00, against all positive copper and mining stock sentiment at the time, and at December 11, 2017 the financing was announced. As majority shareholder Greenstone took up about half the amount, they probably wouldn't have mind to say the least, but there was also a Nordic fund, arranged through UK/Norwegian advisors, which has a reputation of being very aggressive at these sort of things, so management was in no position to raise at higher levels unfortunately.

As a relatively small junior, this is what you can encounter when dealing with multi billion dollar funds. On a sidenote, management attracted PI Financial and Clarksons Platou, which is Norway based, for coverage, because of the financing.

In total this meant an increase in share count of 38.635M shares, bringing the total at 206.2M shares outstanding. Greenstone now owns 48.89% of all outstanding shares of Excelsior Mining, and it is my feeling that they are vying for absolute majority in the near term future as well. Which is not a bad thing as they have only one thing in mind, and that is an exit upon successful ramp-up towards commercial production. Excelsior management is eying first production before year end, as quoted from the news release:

“The Offering was oversubscribed with strong support from major North American, UK and European based institutional investors alongside Greenstone, the Company’s major shareholder,” said, President & CEO, Stephen Twyerould. “With this financing, pre-construction activities at Gunnison will continue on pace as we prepare to seamlessly transition to well-field construction as planned, upon the receipt of the final permit and project finance, expected in the New Year. Backed by stakeholders that share our commitment for technical excellence and environmental stewardship, we remain on-track for copper production in 2018.”

The cash position of Excelsior was estimated at US$4M before this round, so my take is that after subtracting all fees, a bit of working capital etc they could have about US$33M at the moment. According to the company, the proceeds of the US$30M round will be used for the development, construction and maintenance of the Gunnison project, including the acquisition of long lead items, and for working capital requirements.

As management mentioned earlier that they were looking to raise US25M in working capital to use during the first years of staged construction, and capex is US46.9M, my guess is they have arranged part of capex and a good portion of their working capital for now. I can imagine seeing Greenstone going to 51-53% in another financing, raising about US$4-8M, which should be enough to come up with the balance of capex in a debt package. This will probably take place after the UIC permit is granted. This permit was anticipated in January or February the latest, but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) decided on January 23, 2018 that the public comment period would be extended in order to facilitate a public meeting. This meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2018. This extended comment period and public meeting came as a surprise as Excelsior management never indicated this as a possibility. Notwithstanding this, they see it as a good opportunity to inform all stakeholders:

Stephen Twyerould, the President and CEO, said, “We look forward to working with the EPA and all stakeholders to ensure our Gunnison Copper Project meets all regulatory requirements. The Public Meeting is a typical part of the permitting process and represents an opportunity for the communities around us to learn more about the Project prior to receipt of the final EPA Permit. Backed by industry-leading economics, and our commitment to environmental stewardship, the Gunnison Copper Project remains on-track to become the next new copper producer in the United States.”

I was surprised as management indicated that there were no extensively motivated comments provided to EPA in the commenting period. I do believe Excelsior has a very strong case for the UIC permit. Key here is that the Gunnison project is eligible for the requested Aquifer Exemption according to the EPA, and its reasoning is motivated by these two criteria as mentioned in the public notice EPA summary. As a summarized reminder from my last update:

1. 40 CFR § 146.4(a): It does not currently serve as a source of drinking water.

The document explains:

"These reviews demonstrate that the aquifers identified for exemption do not currently serve as a source of drinking water because there are no identified current drinking water supply wells, public or private that currently would draw water from the aquifer proposed for exemption, the formation/portions of formations are vertically and laterally contained (separated) from other USDWs, and no aquifers that serve as sources of drinking water are hydraulically connected to the aquifer."

And:

"The EPA evaluated the modeling approach and the site-specific geologic and hydrogeologic information and planned operational data that served as inputs, in connection with other information in the Class III UIC permit application (including geologic maps, logs, hydrologic information, etc.). Based on this, the EPA determined that the model accurately represents the extent of fluid movement and demonstrates that the aquifer to be exempted is not in contact with any formations that serve as a drinking water supply within one-half mile of the aquifer exemption boundary."

Excelsior Mining searched within a one mile radius of the boundary for sources of drinking water, but fortunately for the company, there are no public water supply wells nearby.

2. 40 CFR § 146.4(b)(1): It cannot now and will not in the future serve as a source of drinking water because it is mineral, hydrocarbon, or geothermal energy producing, or can be demonstrated by a permit applicant as part of a permit application for a Class II or III operation to contain minerals or hydrocarbons that considering their quantity and location are expected to be commercially producible.

The Gunnison FS showed an after-tax IRR of 40% at a copper price of US$2.75/lb Cu, so this can be called commercially producible for sure, as this kind of IRR is world class for any mining project, let alone for a base metal project.

So in order to summarize, there are no public water supply wells in the project area and buffer zone, and the copper in situ is expected to be economic, and these are the two most important subjects for EPA for deeming the Gunnison project eligible for the requested Aquifer Exemption. Nothing has changed here, and therefore the chances of Excelsior succeeding on receiving the UIC permit remain very high in my view.

After the recent financing, the number of outstanding shares increased notably, so it was necessary to re-run the numbers on the sensitivity analysis. I included a scenario involving all debt for the remaining part of the US$47M capex, and a scenario based on 35%/65% equity debt which is industry standard. As at least about US$8M of the US$47M has been raised now in equity, the remaining equity/debt results into a 20%/80% scenario. The US Dollar lost some value since my last update as well, so the CAD NPV went down a bit too. A thing I haven't considered yet is the changed corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, this will be discussed in the next update.

Light green is the base case scenario copper price, dark green is spot copper. Full NPV can be used when commencing commercial production, but in this case production ramp-up is staged. The first stage is planned at 20% of maximum nameplate capacity, but since maximum capacity can be reached in 4 years according to management, it isn't realistic to use just 20% of NPV for valuation purposes when commercial production commences. 50% of NPV seems like a more reasonable discount at that stage, as further ramp-up is already baked in. Even if a 20% capacity and 20% of NPV would be used, there is still upside from current prices, so I continue to believe that Excelsior represents a pretty strong case.