(On July 16, 2009, I asked for volunteers with science degrees and non-academic jobs who would be willing to be interviewed about their careers paths, with the goal of providing young scientists with more information about career options beyond the pursuit of a tenure-track faculty job that is too often assumed as a default. This post is one of those interviews, giving the responses of Pam Korda, a physicist working for a medical device company.)

1) What is your non-academic job?

I am a “Lead Scientist” at an R&D subsidiary of a medical
devices company. In practice, this means I oversee a small group of
scientists and engineers who are part of a project developing a new
method for doing diagnostic tests on human blood samples.

2) What is your science background?

BA, MS, and PhD in physics from the University of Chicago.

3) What led you to this job?

Networking. Early in my grad school career, I realized that the
academic career path was not for me, and so I always intended to go
into some sort of non-academic job. But, I did an academic post-doc
anyway. As the post-doc position neared its end, I started contacting
friends & acquaintances who had science-related jobs outside of
academia. One of them, who had been in the same research group as me
at the University of Chicago, was then a director of R&D for a small
tech start-up company that had grown out of some research done by my
grad advisor. Although I hadn’t been directly involved in that
research, I was familiar with it, and so my friend asked if I’d be
interested in coming to work at his company. I wasn’t sure about it,
but I was interested enough to pay them a visit, and it seemed like a
decent place to work, and it’d let me move back to Chicago, so I
applied, and they hired me as a scientist. Some time later, the
company was bought by a larger company, and some time after *that*, I was
offered the position of “lead scientist” when we reorganized our R&D
group to be more compartmentalized.

4) What’s your work environment like?

These days, I spend most of my time at my desk or in meetings, doing
higher-level planning and directing the research activities of my
group. Since we are not that big a group (like, 4 full-timers total)
in a small division, I still do some work in the lab, some design
work, data analysis, whatever needs doing, really.

It’s directly relevant to the projects my group works on. I make
regular use of my knowledge & experience in optics, statistical
mechanics, condensed-matter physics, error analysis, experiment
design, and data presentation.

7) If a current college student wanted to get a job like yours, how
should they go about it?

Get an advanced degree (Master’s or PhD) in a scientific field. Focus
on experimental science (rather than theory) and do as much lab work
in your chosen field as possible. Keep in touch with friends and
coworkers who leave academia to work in industry. Join a professional
organization in your field of interest which is *not* oriented towards
academics.

8) What’s the most important thing you learned from science?

The most important thing I’ve learned from science is *science*:
knowledge about how the world works, and how to find out how the world
works.

9) What advice would you give to young science students trying to plan
their careers?

i) When choosing a research advisor, look beyond the research topic.
This is somebody upon whom you’ll be depending on for recommendations,
referrals, and support for years to come. Make sure it’s somebody you
can get along with, respect, and who has a reputation for doing right
by their students & post-docs.

ii) Don’t neglect communication skills: the caricature of the
reclusive scientist is bunk. Doing the greatest research in the
universe is pointless unless you have the tools to explain it to
others. This is the case whether you work in an academic lab, a
government lab, or an industrial lab. You always have to justify your
work to the people who fund it, and explain it to people who might
want to employ it in some way.

10) (Totally Optional Question) What’s the pay like?

I really don’t want my salary posted on the Internet, so I’ll just say
that the pay is very good.

Comments

As a physicist doing biology-related work, I’m curious to hear how she got into medical device work. Everyone has a different story. A few start in biophysics right away, others do something else and find biological angles on it, and still others just jump at some point.

The site is currently under maintenance. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.

Books

You've read the blog, now try the books:

Eureka: Discovering Your Inner Scientist will be published in December 2014 by Basic Books. "This fun, diverse, and accessible look at how science works will convert even the biggest science phobe." --Publishers Weekly (starred review) "In writing that is welcoming but not overly bouncy, persuasive in a careful way but also enticing, Orzel reveals the “process of looking at the world, figuring out how things work, testing that knowledge, and sharing it with others.”...With an easy hand, Orzel ties together card games with communicating in the laboratory; playing sports and learning how to test and refine; the details of some hard science—Rutherford’s gold foil, Cavendish’s lamps and magnets—and entertaining stories that disclose the process that leads from observation to colorful narrative." --Kirkus ReviewsGoogle+

How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog is published by Basic Books. "“Unlike quantum physics, which remains bizarre even to experts, much of relativity makes sense. Thus, Einstein’s special relativity merely states that the laws of physics and the speed of light are identical for all observers in smooth motion. This sounds trivial but leads to weird if delightfully comprehensible phenomena, provided someone like Orzel delivers a clear explanation of why.” --Kirkus Reviews "Bravo to both man and dog." The New York Times.

How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is published by Scribner. "It's hard to imagine a better way for the mathematically and scientifically challenged, in particular, to grasp basic quantum physics." -- Booklist "Chad Orzel's How to Teach Physics to Your Dog is an absolutely delightful book on many axes: first, its subject matter, quantum physics, is arguably the most mind-bending scientific subject we have; second, the device of the book -- a quantum physicist, Orzel, explains quantum physics to Emmy, his cheeky German shepherd -- is a hoot, and has the singular advantage of making the mind-bending a little less traumatic when the going gets tough (quantum physics has a certain irreducible complexity that precludes an easy understanding of its implications); finally, third, it is extremely well-written, combining a scientist's rigor and accuracy with a natural raconteur's storytelling skill." -- BoingBoing