With several hundred thousand virtual eBay stores on the e-commerce website, any manufacturer or holder of intellectual property needs to be constantly vigilant, monitoring for fraud, counterfeiting or violations. Two equipment companies recently discovered what they claim is illegal activity and are engaged in lawsuits: Fitness Quest and Bayou Fitness both are claiming infringement of one sort or another (We addressed the problems of eBay in a special feature in our FitBiz by GearTrends® March 2005 journal.

With several hundred thousand virtual eBay stores on the e-commerce website, any manufacturer or holder of intellectual property needs to be constantly vigilant, monitoring for fraud, counterfeiting or violations.

Two equipment companies recently discovered what they claim is illegal activity and are engaged in lawsuits: Fitness Quest and Bayou Fitness both are claiming infringement of one sort or another (We addressed the problems of eBay in a special feature in our FitBiz by GearTrendsÂ® March 2005 journal. Click here to access that store in our GearTrendsÂ® archives.)

"Unfortunately, counterfeits are a problem in our industry," said Kim Raines, in-house general counsel for Fitness Quest. "We monitor eBay."

ADVERTISEMENT

Thanks for watching!

Fitness Quest protecting Ab Lounge brandThe Ohio-based brand, known for its infomercial products and now also for its New Balance line of equipment, claimed in court documents filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, that a long list of individuals from the United States and Canada had each done one or more of the following, together or separately: Violated its Ab Lounge 2 trademark, infringed copyrighted materials related to it, and engaged in selling counterfeit product.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thanks for watching!

ADVERTISEMENT

Thanks for watching!

As of Dec. 5, nine of 16 individuals have had the cases against them dismissed "because of resolutions acceptable to both parties," Raines told SNEWSÂ®. She declined to comment about specifics of the settlements or of the cases still pending that all involved eBay auctions or stores.

She stated that although Fitness Quest monitors eBay regularly, it could not say how long the parties â€“ not all necessarily working together â€“ had been selling the products. Some of the violations included counterfeit product upon which the defendants had allegedly put Fitness Quest's trademark and some involved the use of copyrighted materials such as advertising, marketing, packaging, videos or user manuals.

In the suit filed in late October, Fitness Quest has asked for compensation for "substantial benefits" gained by the defendants, as well as preliminary and permanent injunctions, damages, fees, and the destruction of all infringing and illegal materials. The court documents note that Fitness Quest has sold an estimated 3 million machines under the name Ab Lounge since August 2003, spent more than $35 million advertising the product, and has sold in aggregate more than $235 million in the product. Â "Our policy is, we respect the intellectual property rights of others and we expect others to respect ours," Raines said, "and if counterfeits are discovered, we'll take appropriate legal action when necessary."

A tale of two dot-coms: Bayou Fitness and Fitness BargainsIn another suit filed in November, online retailer and equipment supplier Bayou Fitness (www.bayoufitness.com) has claimed that eBay store Fitness Bargains (click here to see the store) has violated Bayou's non-exclusive license of the use of the technology patented by Total Gym in 1999. That complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas.

Bayou President Jim Berridge declined to comment about the suit to SNEWSÂ® other than to confirm it was still pending. The most recent filing in the case in the Houston Court was an admonition on Nov. 21 by the judge warning against frivolous motions for summary judgment and motions to dismiss.

Interestingly, this is not the first time Bayou, based in Shreveport, La., has brought a case against Fitness Bargains, based in Florida. In February 2005 a complaint was filed for the use of the word "Ultimate" in conjunction with fitness equipment, but that case was dismissed without prejudice in June when a settlement with undisclosed terms was reached.

SNEWSÂ® View: No matter what you think of any company or of eBay, the fact remains that intellectual property is just that: property. That means it is owned by someone, and if that someone is you, we're sure you are monitoring the web and eBay for violations since they are rampant. Â

Precor will be giving the courts a little more to do in the coming months. Along with its licensor, Larry Miller, Precor has filed two patent infringement suits against both Fitness Quest and Sportcraft for allegedly infringing on its 10-year-old elliptical patent. â€œWhile we ...read more

In one fell swoop, the nearly five-year legal wrangling in two courts in two states between Nautilus Inc. and Icon Health & Fitness were ended when Nautilus announced an out-of-court settlement of all outstanding intellectual property litigation. Details of the settlement were ...read more

A nearly 15-month legal tussle between climbing brands Mad Rock and Climb X has reached a settlement with each side claiming a win. The settlement, which was accepted by the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Nov. 29, 2011, dismisses Mad Rock’s claims against ...read more

Several ongoing legal feuds between The Nautilus Group and Icon Health & Fitness charging infringements and false advertising have escalated into what seems like the equivalent of paper-wad wars as both companies fired out public statements that infuriated and frustrated the ...read more

Icon Health & Fitness has won a stay from a federal appellate court on a preliminary injunction Nautilus had only finalized two days earlier that would have kept Icon from marketing, selling or advertising its Crossbow at least until a December trial. With legal maneuvers flying ...read more

In a continuing volley in the legal battle over patent infringement, Icon Health & Fitness picked up another point when a district court last week granted the company a motion that means the court has found the Icon-made Crossbow machine is not substantially similar to the ...read more

Not willing to give up on the nearly 3-year-old patent infringement case, Nautilus has appealed the lower court victory given to Icon in late May to the federal appellate court. After the win was handed to Icon in May when the court dismissed the case (click here to see the ...read more

Taking nearly a year for a decision, the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has ruled in favor of The Nautilus Group on a July 2003 appeal and granted the company a preliminary injunction in its case against Icon that charges trademark infringement of ...read more

As the two behemoth fitness companies Nautilus and Icon spend millions of dollars a year on several patent and trademark infringement legal battles, Nautilus seems to have gained an upper hand in one suit it brought against Icon in December 2002, even though Nautilus lost its bid ...read more