directory-dev mailing list archives

On 5/18/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Enrique Rodriguez a écrit :
>
> > On 5/18/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/18/07, Enrique Rodriguez <enriquer9@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > ...
> >> > PIDs must have gone in at least 1.5 years ago, when we did the first
> >> > prototype with OSGi. They are not new. In fact, that's part of the
> >> > reason the fqpn needed updating.
> >>
> >> I thought you had that in a branch. I did not know all this OSGi
> >> experimentation
> >> was going on in the trunk code outside of isolated modules like those
> >> under
> >> the
> >> osgi subdirectory.
Is it a big deal ? A soon as we keep a track of what those PID are good
> for (means : doco), I think we are safe with keeping them in the code, no
> ?
Yes this is not a big deal. My primary reason for asking was to see if
there was more to this
which I could not tell from a cursory view. It's fine keeping them in the
code but I would like
to organize things a bit better when I get a chance.
Alex