Yeah they do, and neither of them did anything because of what they didn’t believe.

Ever heard of anyone doing anything based on what they DON’T believe?

It’s particularly hilarious because we know precisely why most of the communists in question did things, it was because they were motivated by radical poltical ideas in which they thought they could create ‘utopia’ by killing off the people they didn’t need.

And by the way, I find it funny as hell that NO amount of butchery in the name of the god you believe in ever makes the Bible or your religion ‘evil’, but with atheists its guilt by association from now until dooms day.

Nobody you have named so far was killing anyone in the name of ‘radical atheism’.

Here’s your first clue… Let’s say two men get in to long running dispute and the conflict eventually boils over and one murders the other. What they were fighting over and their reasons for killing had nothing do with their individual religious beliefs.

So I walk in and say ‘Well the killer was (insert reliion here), so that’s why he did it’

Does that make any sense?

You are essentially saying that simply because these people “were atheists” that they did these things, when they actually did them for reasons that had nothing what so ever do with it.

"According to Haaretz, Banki was a high school student who was participating in the parade in order to show solidarity with her LGBT friends."
Sure, sure that's why she was there. What's the old saying:
"Show me your friends, and I'll tell you who you are!"
"If you hang around the barber shop long enough, you're gonna get a haircut."

[5] August 2, 2015 at 1:47pm

matt_c responded:

More mindless stereotyping and bigotry from the supposedly enlightened one. Yawn.

[2] August 2, 2015 at 1:56pm

Eastinfection responded:

You mean, let me understand this … cuz I … maybe its me, maybe I’m a little f’ed up maybe. we’re amusing how? I mean amusing- like we’re clowns? we amuse you? we make you laugh? we’re here to f’ing amuse you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWINtUCshxY

[3] August 1, 2015 at 8:51am

@Blest

Your inability to get the point of my post is laughably hilarious particularly when you then go off on some fantasy rant about me.

Yes, you do want to discriminate against homosexuals and it’s what you keep trying to do and everything you come up with is just a BS excuse for you to be able to do it.

I do not ignore the fact that people with religious beliefs have rights too. In fact, I actually understand those rights, how they work, where they apply, and what the limits are. What you want is special treatments and exceptions that would not apply to practically any other circumstance, given to you, or it’s ‘violating your rights’. What you want is special rights.

I believe you can see Jesus Camp on Youtube if you’re interested, but in any event it’s not hard to find, and fundamentalists don’t typically see what goes on in that film as child abuse. As I pointed out above, what goes on there is not illegal and is in fact Constitutionally protected but absolutely anyone not completely out of their skull with religious indoctrination watches that film, and is deeply disturbed by what is being done to those children.

Denial of evolution and the attempt to remove it from school is not a ‘fringe’ element of the religious people in this country nor is the attempt to push creationism in to classrooms under the radar. I fully accept that YOU are not one of ‘these people’, taking you at your word, but that doesn’t change the facts.

I can and will judge people by experience and the reality, the experience is, everything I’ve said so far.

let me guess... they tell Christians to kill themselves and Jews for God's glory?
or not?

[5] July 31, 2015 at 5:21pm

5ezpzez responded:

blinknight = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMtBPBXIzEU

[-2] July 31, 2015 at 4:34pm

@super

How many times do we have to go over this same, stupid, idiotic, non-question?

Let’s try this one more time for you and for everyone who keeps right on asking it.

Refusal of sevice to a bigot because you are NOT a bigot, is not even remotely close to being the same thing as refusal of service becaue you ARE a bigot and by the way, you are proving beyond all doubt that you are indeed a bigot against gay people if they are to you what ‘God Hates Gays’ is to a gay baker.

@Father

Indeed. In this case it comes from religious fundamentalism.

@matt

Yes, how dare I point out hypocrisy, bigotry and hate from Christians, that’s so unfair of me.

@nigel

I never specifically said ‘gay people’ were going to hell, i said Christians run around telling people they will got o hell.

@Bearway

Yes, Christians have to obey the same laws and rules as everyone else. I know, it’s not fair to ask that of them.

@fortherecord

Did I call for the government to do anything? I call it child abuse, becuase doing that to kids is abusive.

You no longer can say homosexuality is a sin, You can no longer say homosexuals are abnormal, unnatural and sick.

[7] July 31, 2015 at 1:09pm

XGP15A226 responded:

Freedom Of Speech is the protection of unpopular speech. So, no, of if you are penalized for your opinion Freedom of Speech in not is play.

[10] July 31, 2015 at 1:13pm

NigelTufnel responded:

You can still say sodomy is unhealthy and bad for you. At least WebMD still says it's bad for you.

[11] July 31, 2015 at 1:20pm

Mojo-Man responded:

I have a fundamental right to discriminate. Our courts have usurped that fundamental right. They now pick and choose, for me, who I can and can not discriminate against. It's fine to discriminate against a schizophrenic from joining a police department, but not fine to make a homosexual wedding cake. It's fine to discriminate against the obese from joining the military, but not fine to discriminate against the homosexual from joining my place of employment... .
Twisted logic is what it takes to practice devolution.

[-1] July 31, 2015 at 1:29pm

Grover_Standpipe responded:

Really, XGP15A226? There's no freedom of speech unless you are not only free from government censorship, but also from any social pressure from your fellow citizens? Is that what you think? So, if a guy goes around saying that, "Hitler was right about the damn Jews," or, "most so-called rape victims are really asking for it," we're all supposed to pretend that's just ducky, because if he had to suffer any consequences whatsoever for saying that stuff, that would be the end of civil liberties in this great nation? Is that really what you think?

[6] July 31, 2015 at 1:34pm

Snowblown responded:

This Daily Show segment nailed it!
@mojo
You can't be serious with that comment. Organizations who don't hire individuals specifically because they physically or mentally can't perform their duties is not considered discrimination and cannot be compared with hiring those that can.

[18] July 31, 2015 at 1:49pm

Bearway64 responded:

As long as there is a law that people can be jailed for "hate speech", there is no freedom of speech.

[5] July 31, 2015 at 2:01pm

stray responded:

XGP, having "Freedom of Speech" doesn't require anyone to listen to you nor does it protect you from anyone who might disagree with you. If it did that would infringe on someone else's freedom of speech. You can't be penalized by the government, but in the court of public opinion you're fair game.

[4] July 31, 2015 at 2:33pm

bornsurviver responded:

Blink I thought you said you were educated. Speech with consequences is not free. Free means no strings attached. So these so called consequences you can stick where the sun doesn’t shine. Thats pc right. Since thats the new thing for you atheists. Ha ha. Ill side with your so called sky daddy rather than a bunch of sodomites.

July 31, 2015 at 3:10pm

fortherecord responded:

You know how you liberals love to talk about 'freedom FROM, religion'?
Well freedom of speech then includes freedom FROM speech, the right to speak when you want and not speak when you don't want.
Ergo, a counselor has a right to use his freedom ***OF*** speech to counsel anyone he/she wants and still has the same right of freedom ***FROM*** speech to not counsel when he/she does not want to.
So if he/she, decides to counsel only for G-d fearing people and not for gay couples that is all within his/her rights of freedom ***OF*** and freedom ***FROM*** speech as he/she chooses.

[3] July 31, 2015 at 3:16pm

quicksdraw responded:

@archvader,I can say what ever I want "Homosexuality is a sin and homosexuals are abnormal" see I just said it,try and stop me. Did you just missed the fact that by your rule we can't say something that you may disagree with,you do know that's called tyranny don't you? when you punish people who won't march with you jackboot wearing leftwingers that makes you a fascist. being gay is sick and 1/3rd of them are pedophiles.

[-4] July 31, 2015 at 3:28pm

Grover_Standpipe responded:

Well, fortherecord, we don't have freedom of speech at work. Nobody does. At the very least, you're not allowed to insult the boss, and you’re not allowed to insult the customers. Even if you are self employed, there are things that you cannot say to clients because they would violate the standards of your profession so egregiously that you could not work any more. All jobs involve talking to customers. Just because your job is all talk, doesn't give you a special right to discriminate against people on the basis of who they are.

[3] July 31, 2015 at 3:53pm

fortherecord responded:

Well Grover The Boss can under the Constitution say just about anything they want.
If there is a standard of behavior in a profession, the violation of which would get them ostracized from their chosen profession, that is between them and the other professionals and customers they deal with.
It is not the business of the government to get involved in that.

July 31, 2015 at 4:11pm

KKuurus responded:

If you choose to censor yourself, you still have the right to speak you just choose not to.If the government writes a law saying you can't say something then you lose freedom of speech. Even in the classically misunderstood decision by the SCOTUS they didn't okay a law saying you couldn't shout fire merely that you could be punished afterward using other law.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 4:17pm

quicksdraw responded:

Yea judges who illegally make gay rights laws are preventing Christians from speaking.

[-1] July 31, 2015 at 4:24pm

Grover_Standpipe responded:

It depends on how important your work is. The government, for example, enforces by law the professional standards to which doctors and lawyers are expected to adhere, and necessarily so considering the amount of harm that an unfit person can do in either of those professions.

[-1] July 31, 2015 at 4:45pm

fortherecord responded:

No matter how important the work is (and it's not 'my work' since that is not my profession)
Government has a right to regulate to prevent fraud or injury, not to decide what kind of bedside manner, they are required to have.
And not to decide who they must accept as patients/clients.

July 31, 2015 at 5:06pm

johnathangalt responded:

Freedom of speech only matters when people disagree with you. Furthermore, your right to "freedom of association" is the right most necessary for survival. Supreme Courts for centuries have ruled that freedom of association is implied in (and protected by) the 1st amendment.
Speech may always have consequences, but not from Government. Government has to be blind to who and what you are; and judge you by your actions.
Citizens, however, are expected to judge by anything they think is practical for themselves. This is a citizen's UNALIENABLE RIGHT. Please look up what unalienable means.

[2] July 31, 2015 at 5:19pm

UseYourBrainz responded:

@ARCHVader
You CAN say whatever you want.
But you CANNOT expect to so say asinine things and not be called an idiot.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 6:37pm

castuslonginus responded:

If speech has consequences that are enforced by the government(law) it's not free.You could speak against the King of England and suffer the consequences mandated by law.You'd be hung, drawn and quartered,just like today.People in Germany were "free" to speak out against Hitler,those that did were paid visits by the Gestapo(the law).That's not very free.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 7:07pm

enoughsEnough responded:

By that logic then NOBODY in the HISTORY of the world has ever NOT had Freedom Of Speech, just consequences of it.
……….
I don’t think before the 1st Am. was written people would try to say something and it just wouldn’t come out of their mouths. The 1st Am. is ABOUT the consequences, and that there shouldn’t be any for most of what we currently have consequences.
……….
For instance, at my work someone brought up the 6-gender-choices in Cali school applications. I said it was silly, and that upset a lot of people. I was talked to after and was told if I wanted to keep my job I’d not express anything against that… because I work at a school, and most likely we will have that too (and I live in Texas – yikes!)

[21] July 31, 2015 at 12:29pm

You want to discriminate against gay people, you want to run around telling people they’re going to hell, you want to look at something like “Jesus Camp” and maintain that is not child abuse, you not only want to deny valid science but fight tooth and nail to prevent people from learning it in school.

And you think hate is perpetuated by atheists?

Not at all. What you are seeing is people finally push back after years of Christians getting away with everything.

Should a gay baker be forced to make a cake that says God Hates Gays? Should a Jewish baker be forced to make a Hitler B-day cake? Should a vegan catering service be forced to cook venison for an SCI Hunt club meeting?

[6] July 31, 2015 at 12:37pm

Fatheroftwo responded:

Hate is an equal opportunity offender. No one is immune until you discover where it comes from.

[2] July 31, 2015 at 1:08pm

matt_c responded:

You'd come off as a lot less of a hypocrite if you didn't rail against Christians with the exact same mentality as some Christians rail against gays.

July 31, 2015 at 1:18pm

NigelTufnel responded:

Who said Gay people were going to hell? Jesus loves us all. God forgives us all. Homosexuals are just going to get to see him sooner because the statistics and science behind sodomy and the lifestyle says so. Gays die sooner than smokers. No one’s asking you to NOT be gay. But sooner or later you will have to give up sodomy. Btw, gays are 40% more likely to smoke than straight people. What's going on there Blinko? You guys have the double threat going.

[7] July 31, 2015 at 1:20pm

Grover_Standpipe responded:

Hate? Oh, no, no, no, blink, the stupid bigoted morons of America don’t hate gay people; they love them! They just hate their disgusting sin of having sex with each other instead of leading miserable lives of loneliness and frustration. The stupid bigoted morons don’t want gay people to ruin their own lives because they’re mean. They want to save them from being tortured for all eternity by their God, who also loves them, but, through no fault of His own, would still have to subject them to eternal torture because they wouldn’t do what He told somebody thousands of years ago to tell the rest of us He said.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 1:43pm

Bearway64 responded:

People say words or refuse to associate with people they find objectionable, and the GayKK jumps in with attorneys, picket lines at peoples' homes and armed police.
Yeah, same same...

[2] July 31, 2015 at 2:01pm

4truth2all responded:

Grover:
"stupid bigoted morons"
words of a man of love
and blessings to you your goldness

[1] July 31, 2015 at 2:50pm

Grover_Standpipe responded:

Did I call anybody a stupid bigoted moron, 4truth2all? I did not. I just described twisted, irrational thoughts that obviously would only seem to make sense to a stupid bigoted moron. If the shoe fits, that's not my fault.

[5] July 31, 2015 at 2:50pm

TheGrtDcptn responded:

'Jesus loves us all. God forgives us all'
Yeah, Jesus loves all...that's why He DIED to save everyone FROM THEIR SIN, not so they could continue to wallow in their sin, and without acceptance of His gift of salvation, without repentance, without turning AWAY from sin...there is NO forgiveness.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 4:20pm

fortherecord responded:

"you want to look at something like “Jesus Camp” and maintain that is not child abuse,"
Here we go folks. All you who wanted government to be able to come onto private property to be able to charge people with 'animal abuse' will now have to deal with government coming onto your private property to charge you with
'child abuse' for teaching your kid about your religion or sending them to a religion based, summer camp.
I knew many years ago, that this was the true and hidden agenda of the whole 'animal welfare' movement and have been saying so for many years.
This is the next big thing (or one the next few big things) for them to keep pushing for, till they get.
And none of you who have ever argued for these laws 'for the animals' or who have thumbed my posts down for pointing out the evil and unconstitutionality of such laws, have any moral basis for saying anything against them using the exact same laws and basis for taking your children away from you and charging you with abuse of your own children just for not raising them the way the gay mafia (Ironically a term coined by Michael Savage who himself is Nazilib animal rights wacko, who is just as much as at fault for endorsing these laws as anyone else is (and so is Mark Levine by the way, they have both fanatically and mindlessly and robotically demanded these laws increase and be made stronger)), demands you raise them.
All liberal policies and laws and ideas always have only one purpose, to enslave everyone.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 4:26pm

fortherecord responded:

"you not only want to deny valid science but fight tooth and nail to prevent people from learning it in school."
Because being born gay (but somehow not being born to be attracted to children) is supposedly 'valid science', just because the Gay mafia says so.
"And you think hate is perpetuated by atheists?"
Yep, I never heard in either the late 20th Century or the 21st century of a devoutly Christian church going Christian telling anyone to 'get out of my class, or leave in a body bag' the way an atheist professor did.
"Not at all. What you are seeing is people finally push back after years of Christians getting away with everything."
Sure that's why the atheists are attacking Chassidic Jews as well, to push back against Christian persecution.
The libs really believe their own propaganda. Folks you can't make this stuff up.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 4:30pm

Grover_Standpipe responded:

A crime doesn't stop being a crime just because you commit it on property that you own, fortherecord. Every thinking citizen of every country in the world understands that, except for you.

[-2] July 31, 2015 at 4:34pm

blinknight responded:

@super
How many times do we have to go over this same, stupid, idiotic, non-question?
Let's try this one more time for you and for everyone who keeps right on asking it.
Refusal of sevice to a bigot because you are NOT a bigot, is not even remotely close to being the same thing as refusal of service becaue you ARE a bigot and by the way, you are proving beyond all doubt that you are indeed a bigot against gay people if they are to you what 'God Hates Gays' is to a gay baker.
@Father
Indeed. In this case it comes from religious fundamentalism.
@matt
Yes, how dare I point out hypocrisy, bigotry and hate from Christians, that's so unfair of me.
@nigel
I never specifically said 'gay people' were going to hell, i said Christians run around telling people they will got o hell.
@Bearway
Yes, Christians have to obey the same laws and rules as everyone else. I know, it's not fair to ask that of them.
@fortherecord
Did I call for the government to do anything? I call it child abuse, becuase doing that to kids is abusive.
But it's also completely legal and Constitutionally protected.

[2] July 31, 2015 at 5:25pm

fortherecord responded:

Grover, things that are not crimes are still lied about by liberals and made out to be 'criminal' when nothing in the constitution permits such criminalizing, especially when it comes to religion which the First Amendment specifically forbids any laws, against.
"Did I call for the government to do anything?"
Did the first Gay activists in history ever call for wedding cake bakers who would not serve them, to be forced out of business?
No and anyone who said they eventually would would have been called 'insane' and all other kinds of names for even suggesting it would ever eventually happen.
First it starts out with simple name calling and then later at some future point they start making laws against it.
"I call it child abuse, becuase doing that to kids is abusive."
No more so then brainwashing a kid into the intolerant and hate filled, Radical atheist religion.
"But it’s also completely legal"
It' won't be, once the radical atheists have enough power.
Whats legal today is not legal later on, just like a baker used to have the right to refuse service to anyone and now it's not legal.
"and Constitutionally protected."
So is the right of a counselor based on his religion and religion based morals, to council whoever he wants and to not counsel whoever he does not want.
But that never stopped liberals and it won't stop them in regard to this either.
They will make up some BS excuse that it's not Constitutional and the lib courts, will uphold it.

[-1] July 31, 2015 at 5:41pm

fortherecord responded:

"@Father
Indeed. In this case it comes from religious fundamentalism."
Yeah from the Radical Atheist religious fundamentalists who's religion tells them to attack and force out of business, those who Blaspheme 'holy Atheism' by having the audacity and unmitigated gall to dare to believe in G-d.

'And you think hate is perpetuated by atheists?'
Not think, KNOW...
You are everything you accuse others of being...a hateful bigoted hypocrite.

August 2, 2015 at 7:09am

rob_pompolit responded:

@Grover_Standpipe
Reference — “A crime doesn’t stop being a crime just because you commit it on property that you own, fortherecord. Every thinking citizen of every country in the world understands that, except for you.”
Make up your mind. Since you don’t have a problem with Planned Parent Hood commiting crimes. Going with your own premise. Then Planned Parent Hood should be in trouble for not flowing the law.
And technically ever time you don’t report a violation. You are actually committing a crime. — And not only that. Technically you are suppose to know and abide by every law and regulation since the beginning of time. That hasn’t been re-sended. So, when will you report your self?
Plus, technically the law itself is against the law. Since it violates the Civil Rights of the individuals. And when a law or regulation violates an already statues law/regulation. Then, morally and legal “YOU” are required to not follow it. Or you may find there is a “Nuremberg trial” in the future, …when the winds change.
Either stand for others rights. Or no one will defend yours. And when the first dictator comes along. They will be more than willing to help. Because you have taken way the reason they was defending yours. That is reality and the real world.
Because odds are, you are to afraid to die for a person to be gay. Until you are. You are all talk.

August 2, 2015 at 7:31am

rob_pompolit responded:

@blink...
You are the bigot. Because practicing a religion is not a service. And the government discriminates every single day by giving more rights of one group over another. Technically the Progressive Tax code and education admissions in public universities is proof of that. -- And because of that fact. They are denying service. Even based off your illogical premise. And the every time you don't agree with someone eases lifestyle or belief. You are in fact discriminating. Because did not adopt it. So technically speaking. The fact you don't agree with people n this sites shows you are a bigot. So, you will not have a problem with the government telling you what you will do on everything ...will you? -- Because you object just ounce, and don't fall in line. Again you will be proving that your behavior in-of-itself is directly or indirectly denying service to someone at some point.

[5] July 31, 2015 at 10:31am

@East

When I have taken care of children that age, I took them in with me.

@Silver

Yes, that is just my opinion.

It just happens to be the morally superior one that demonstrates the greatest amount of common sense.

So you’re business is not part of a religion and as such cannot claim any sort of exemption from anti-discrimination laws. Thank you for confimring this.

Just because your religion tells you that it is okay to be a bigot does not make you exempt from anti-discrimination laws. If your personal beliefs can allow you to ignore such laws then anyone can ignore them.

And hiliarously, you will have no problem seeing the hate and the bigotry when it’s done to any group of which you are a member.

1. This changes precisely nothing. The god in question still systematically killed innocent people, including children, who had no power and no control over the situation. Pointing out that the Jews were horrifically treated slaves in the story does not make the systematic killing of children any different.

And by the way, it’s a story, it didn’t actually happen.

2. This is the usual BS of trying to find a way to make it ‘not gods fault’. It’s the same old ‘credit for everything, responsibility for nothing’. If I have magical powers and tell a whole town it has to do “X”, even if “X” is a morally justfied thing, if I then use my magical powers to kill all the first born children of the town, this does not make me anything other than a horrible monster that just murdered a bunch of innocent people. Period. Nobody in their right mind would say ‘Oh it’s not his fault he murdered all those innocent people!’

Yes, I agree, this i a waste of time because you’re an idiot who is trying to play the ‘You can’t blame god for stuff god did!’ game.

"not for one damned second" is a ridiculous standard, if you mean it literally, blink.
pulling up to a gas station/ convenience store, and running in for 2 minutes to grab a soda or something is really not a big deal, and not at all like this scenario.

[-4] July 31, 2015 at 10:20am

Silverhammer05 responded:

The Sky was overcast and the window was open...The Kid was fine, 1 more minute would not cause death.There were no heroes here and there was no mortal danger. Just people trying to get some attention.

[-6] July 31, 2015 at 10:25am

Silverhammer05 responded:

That’s your opinion, I think it was destruction of property. The kid was not in mortal danger, maybe if the sun was blazing and all the windows were up but they were not.

[9] July 31, 2015 at 10:29am

RJJinGadsden responded:

The really stupid thing that Silverhammer05 essentially says, is that the cops were at fault for failing to see only that one minute into the future. Funny thing I guess since when I was a cop I missed that Clairvoyance 101 class too.

[5] July 31, 2015 at 10:31am

blinknight responded:

@East
When I have taken care of children that age, I took them in with me.
@Silver
Yes, that is just my opinion.
It just happens to be the morally superior one that demonstrates the greatest amount of common sense.

[7] July 31, 2015 at 10:40am

BlazingInSC responded:

@silverhammer05 – you are an idiot. An overcast sky does not mean a child can’t suffer from heat stroke. An open window (sliver cracked at best since they had to break the window) does not provide sufficient cooling.
A sweat drenched child means that child was dehydrated and could very well have been in the early stages of a heat-related illness. The child was not “fine”. There is nothing anyone can say that would justify this woman leaving her child unattended in her car while she filled up a grocery cart.
Nevermind that the child could have very easily been abducted – but that’s a different story altogether.
@Blinky - I'm glad there is something we can actually agree on once in a while.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 2:38pm

deeberj responded:

East, have you had children? Sure, I will run in at a gas station for two minutes and come out and my kid is gone. Don't be lazy. Take your little ones in the store with you.

[1] July 31, 2015 at 3:10pm

Eastinfection responded:

deeb- yes, i'm a proud parent.
how would your kids be gone?
did you leave the car unlocked?
did you leave it running?
i don't live in Harlem. maybe you do.

July 31, 2015 at 10:10am

@WayTruth

Yes, more and more people do support equal rights for gays, and Christianity is slowly dying. You’re free to accept those things are true right now, or you’re free to continue to live under the delusion that what you want to think is true resembles reality.

And yes, I can say it’s discrimination, because it is. It is whether or not gay marriage is legal by the way. The only people trying to play word games are people like you.

Let fundamentalsits have their bigoted beleifs concerning gay people, but it is still wrong. Do not try to force us to into your bigotry. (and unlike what you said, this is actually what you try to do)

I agree. The lib media can't be trusted . It's all about the lib agenda to ridicule conservative Americans.. you know........" Well there you have it folks , definitive proof that its all made up!".
Sure to be another stellar example of why I don't have a television........it causes mind cancer.

[-2] July 31, 2015 at 6:01pm

Destroyer_of_Civilizations responded:

Why don't we ever read or hear about an atheist becoming possessed by a demon? The answer is because we don't believe in that sort of BS and do go around telling silly stories.

[2] July 31, 2015 at 6:01am

@Mizu

Yes it is, and let’s be clear right now.

There is no ‘clever word game’ or ‘legal trick’ or any other method you or anyone else will come up with that will either make discrimination ‘okay’ or legal. If you offer a service to the public, anti-discrimination law says you don’t get to engage in discriminatory practices.

And one more time: There is no ‘clever way’ you’re going to get around that. Quit trying to be clever and failing at it in laughably stupid ways.