Tab wrote:
> > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/#exclusions
> > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/#regions
> >
> > For comparison purposes, I refer to the GCPM-based proposal as Plan B,
> > and the set of proposals [9][10][11] championed by Microsoft and Adobe
> > as "Plan A".
>
> While I generally prefer the pseudo-element approach, basing it off of
> multicol has some issues. Namely, it's incompatible with new layout
> modes like Flexbox and Grid.
That's a fair point. In general, it should be possible to specify any
declarations on columns/regions. E.g.:
article::region(1) {
display: flexbox;
}
But not all combinations make sense.
Could you describe a use case where you'd want to combine
regions/exclusions with flexbox?
> (Also, Hakon, you broke the GCPM spec within the last couple of minutes.)
Something weird happened when I checked in a new version from a
connection that blocked certain ports. Fixed.
-h&kon
HÃ¥kon Wium Lie CTO Â°Ã¾eÂ®Âª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome