US Chamber's of Commerce's New Ads: Vote GOP - The Nation's No. 1 Business Lobby Spends $1.1 Million on Ads, Avoids Disclosure of Donors.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the country’s largest pro-business trade association, has reported spending more than $1.1 million on ads in four contested U.S. Senate races, according to Federal Election Commission records.

Thomas J. Donohue, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of CommerceJacquelyn Martin/AP

While the Chamber says it is a bipartisan group, the four spots are designed to aid Republican candidates in Nevada, Hawaii, New Mexico and North Dakota — battleground races that could lead to GOP control of the Senate next year.

In Nevada, the Chamber’s boxing-themed ad “Hit” criticizes Democratic challenger U.S. Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., for siding with Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on healthcare reform and "fighting" to raise energy prices. It touts Republican incumbent Sen. Dean Heller, on the other hand, as being on the side of small business owners ($489,000).

In Hawaii, the group’s ad touts former GOP Gov. Linda Lingle as having a “positive, bipartisan agenda” ($250,000).

In North Dakota, the Chamber says Democratic Senate candidate and former state attorney general Heidi Heitkamp “can’t make up her mind” and implies she'll "say anything to get elected" ($202,400).

And the group praises Republican Senate candidate and former congresswoman Heather Wilson of New Mexico for “fighting for New Mexico energy,” ($220,901), countering an ad campaign that began yesterday from the Sierra Club’s political action committee called “Dirty Water, Dirty Politics” which criticized Wilson’s record on environmental issues.

The spots are "express advocacy," meaning they urge viewers to vote for or against a candidate. They appear to be the first from the U.S. Chamber since its pledge to halt “electioneering communications” which name a candidate but do not tell viewers which way to vote. A recent court decision required groups that make electioneering communications to reveal their donors — something the Chamber has called “intimidation.”

Campaign finance reform advocates see the move as "expected but nevertheless troubling."

"The Chamber is evading disclosure to protect its members from shareholder accountability," said Paul S. Ryan, an attorney at the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center.

"This move removes any pretense that the Chamber is involved in issue advocacy," Ryan continued. "This move makes clear that the Chamber is all about influencing elections."

The ads began running July 17, but it is unclear how long they will air. A spokesman for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In other outside spending news:

On Monday, Majority PAC, a super PAC that supports Democratic Senate candidates, released “Bottom Line,” an ad opposing John Brunner, a Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Missouri. Brunner is running against Todd Akin and Sarah Steelman in the Republican primary on August 7. The winner will challenge Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill in the fall.

A super PAC called Progress for Washington reported spending more than $111,000 Monday on TV advertising in the primary in Washington’s 1st Congressional District. The super PAC, nicknamed “MamaPAC” by its critics, is financed by Margaret Rothschild, the mother of Democratic candidate Laura Ruderman, who the PAC supports. The August 7 primary is a “two-top” primary, meaning Ruderman is running against several candidates across party lines and the top two finishers will compete again in November.

Pro-David Dewhurst super PAC Texas Conservatives Fund reported spending $1.35 million Monday on advertising opposing Republican Senate candidate Ted Cruz in Texas. Cruz is running against Republican David Dewhurst in a run-off election, which will be held on July 31.

Rachael is a Master’s journalism student at American University. She completed her bachelor’s degree in Political Science at Reed College in 2010. She has been published in the Portland Mercury, an alternative newsweekly, and several local newspapers and magazines in Laguna Beach, Calif. and Portland, Ore.

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558 Telephone (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.