Steve Ressler is keenly aware of all the stereotypes about government workers: They're overpaid, they're incompetent, they're lazy, they're ineffective. Their benefits are too generous. They don't actually solve problems. They're paper-pushers, clock-punchers, tax mooches. There are too many of them. You know the saying: "Good enough for government work"?

The Washington Post actually field-tested these insults recently ("A Negative Poll for Federal Workers"). The paper found that a majority of people think federal workers are overpaid and don't work as hard as the private-sector counterparts. Mulling these poll results, Ressler Googled upon the ultimate affront: There's even a national Government Sucks Day.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thanks for watching!

A third-generation public servant, he is quite certain its organizers have his colleagues pegged all wrong. And while anti-government sentiment seems to be at its apex these days — catching in its sights institutions and individuals alike — he decided to plan a counter event, timed this weekend to riff off of Jon Stewart's mock-serious Washington "Rally to Restore Sanity."

THE IDEA LOBBYMiller-McCune's Washington correspondent Emily Badger follows the ideas informing, explaining and influencing government, from the local think tank circuit to academic research that shapes D.C. policy from afar.

"We believe government is more than not sucking, it's actually awesome, but people have such low expectations," Ressler said. "If the idea is to restore sanity, let's restore sanity in our conversation around government employees. We're not all evil, we're not all lazy."

In 2008, while he was working for the Department of Homeland Security, Ressler founded a kind of Facebook for feds, a networking site where government workers meet up to do exactly what a majority of survey respondents suspect they don't do — share best practices and innovations for more effective government. GovLoop, which now has more than 36,000 members from federal, state and local governments, also serves as a source of affirmation (available swag: "Gov't Rock Star" T-shirts) Ressler, who perhaps a tad ironically has left government and now runs the network full time, is using it to help spearhead the Saturday march.

"You can imagine, if you work in public service, you're giving your heart to something you believe in," he said, "and to have people bash you every day, it's not fun."

Many critics may not even realize they're bashing these people. But when politicians preach about slashing "wasteful government," they're implicating millions of government workers in the waste. And when angry activists shout about "taking back our government," it is in fact from an army of apolitical fellow citizens, not a monolith of party power, that they would take it.

(Vexed by these recent slogans, the largest union of federal employees is even airing ads in some heated congressional races this fall: "Food and mine inspection — gone," intones the narrator, should "cut government" solutions come to pass. "Forget about border patrol or keeping terrorists locked up. And returning veterans? Give them a cheap voucher instead of a quality VA hospital.")

Ressler sadly notes that government workers get the smear from both sides. Small-government activists don't like them. But neither, surprisingly, do the do-gooders, most of whom would pick a non-profit or NGO gig over government service.

Government workers, though, may benefit from a phenomenon familiar to many other maligned groups: Anyone who actually knows one of these people is more likely to view the whole lot favorably. So maybe Ressler's "Government is Awesome" sign on Saturday will encourage a few cynics to come up to him and ask why.

"For me, it's not about politics, it's not about whether we should have health care or not, whether we should build up troops in Iraq or Afghanistan, or Homeland Security is too big or too small," he said. "It's about once we get those issues, let's implement them well as government bureaucrats. If the politicians have decided we're doing health care, I would want the smartest people in the world implementing it to make it the most effective."

Emily Badger writes about cities and urban policy for the New York Times from the San Francisco bureau. She's particularly interested in housing, transportation, and inequality — and how they're all connected. She joined the Times in 2016 from the Washington Post.