If the Soviets had/have "weather modification technology" then why didn't they use it to take over Afghanistan in the late 70's instead of having their asses handed to them? Why didn't they use it to win the cold war?

Perhaps it can't be used in that way or at that time as well as it can be used now. The Americans will constantly downplay what they have or are planning for security reasons and are not afraid to work on and keep secrets from their people and the world. If this were not so then we would all know all the information on say UFO's and other clandestine operations that are part of the psy/black ops they have.

A true democracy would give access as an essential part of its formula to all its citizens, all relevant information concerning our decisions. Instead we get what we are told to believe and leave the rest to our fearless leaders.

Shades of a grandiose conspiracy theory. This thread is in its proper place.

_________________Completely sane world
madness the only freedom

An ability to see both sides of a question
one of the marks of a mature mind

It is hard to find recent HAARP data other than the apparent implementation of antennae that increases the array size by three times.

Eastlund/Eastman originally wanted a billion watts for a truly decisive military weapon. They were nowhere close to that several years ago.

I really wonder what they are up to.

The Soviets have a much simpler weapon. I don't think they can aim it plus it is dimunitve in comparison.

Dr Nick Begich seems to be quiet these days....he had been a vocal expert. Prolly got a gag order put on him.

I do know they are absolutely tearing up the Alaskan wilderness while securing natural resources.

_________________"If the people allow private banks to control their currency the banks and corporations will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson