Search form

You are here

The Dragonspeak Dialogue Part IV

"nd I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon" (Revelation 13:11).

The Dragonspeak Dialogue series has addressed how the globalist thinkers, Marxists all, have collectively sought to shape succeeding generations through the fundamental formula ofthesis versus antithesis, equals synthesis. Typically, this equation is associated with the 19th century German philosopher Georg Immanuel Hegel, and is widely referenced under the lofty rubric of the Hegelian Dialectic.

The later German educators, philosophers, psychologists, and behaviourists who clustered in Frankfort Germany in the 1930's, unofficially known as the Frankfort school, married Sigmund Freud to Karl Marx; for they believed the only way to change the world was to put all of humanity into analysis. The world became their patient, and as most are aware, when you go to a "shrink," you can talk about anything.

All psychiatry starts with complete moral neutrality, as the therapists seek to foster an environment in which the patient is never judged – the complete opposite of the fixed, didactic rigidity found in the Christian God, who will chastise those whom He loves. In the parental model, the extension of God was and is, found in the Patriarchal figure, and it fell to "Dad" to punish the errant children – a process which was closely associated with the boundaries of life in His house. Thus, the "thesis" was in the role of the father, and the "antithesis" was the child who periodically needs correction.

This goes back to the very beginning, and is widely seen in the Old Testament, where the LORD repeatedly warned Israel of the consequences of disobedience:

"And if ye will not for all this hearken unto me, but walk contrary unto me; Then I will walk contrary unto you also in fury; and I, even I, will chastise you seven times for your sins" (Leviticus 26:27, 28).

As the Frankfort school's worldview was in line with globalsocialism, they invariably clashed with Hitler's National Socialism, a mutation of the same Hegelian formula which also sought to restructure the world – but the Nazi aberration included a racial component which elevated "Aryan" Germans to a unique category in which they retained an elevated, and chosen people status – the Ubermensche, or "overman," in Nazi parlance.

In the face of Hitler's ferocity, and the likelihood of an untimely demise via the political fervor found in the party, the globalsocialists at Frankfort all fled to America, where they were welcomed into the hallowed halls of academia. This is why the educational establishment was the first strata of American culture to manifest the relativistic thinking which now permeates the entire world.

Rather ironically, after Hitler was defeated by the allied powers, the crème de la crème of the Nazi war criminals were also quietly imported into America under a secretive program known as Project Paperclip, and these brutal former SS officers became the nexus of what morphed into the Central Intelligence Agency – the CIA.

Thus, two competing political strains of the Dragonspeak Dialogue process were deeply planted in the American garden; one which was given access to the nation's children, in a widespread effort to mold successive generation's minds towards global socialism, and the other was surreptitiously embedded into what President Dwight Eisenhower called theMilitary-Industrial complex.

This is, by the way, seen in Bible prophecy via the progressive imagery of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. The Red Horse of Communism, personified by the Soviet Union, following the Patriarchal White Horse of colonial hegemony (as seen in the British crown), was succeeded by the Black Horse of German Fascism. They all ultimately merge in the amalgamated, consensus driven empire of America, imaged therein as a Pale Horse.

In many previous efforts, this writer has also shown how the Four Horsemen are the same entities as the Lion, Bear, Leopard, and Diverse Fourth Beast of Daniel 7 – an allegorical sequence which also informs us the predecessor kingdoms were scheduled to lose their pre-eminence, but are allowed to continue even as their attributes were to be adapted by theDiverse Fourth Beast/Pale Horse of America:

"As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time" (Daniel 7:12).

Revelation picturesquely shows us the characteristics of the Colonial, Communist, and Fascist empires imaged as Beast/Horsemen, which are subsequently grafted into the final kingdom – America – as we see the end-times empire described with elements of each of its predecessors:

"And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion…." (Revelation 13:2).

As the Dragonspeak Dialogue progressively moved the world away from the absolute truth, the intellectuals reasoned that in order to do away with the rigid Patriarchal worldview, which energized the Western nations through the agency of the family unit, the Freudianized Marxists of Frankfort would need to reverse the roles of Father and Child. Instead of the fixed Father figure as the thesis who corrected the excesses of the child's antithesis (with the hope the synthesis would be a reasonable facsimile of the Father), the atheistic thinkers (an oxymoron if there ever was one), claimed the wild child was the thesis, and the lower order, archaic thinker who was standing in the way of the child's real potential was that old codger, the foolish, set in his ways, Father – aka the antithesis.

Freud, who repeatedly propagated pedophilia, wanted the "child" to be free to explore his or her sexuality, and that old primitive "Dad" (read the Frankfortian antithesis) stood in the way. I am not an anthropologist, but in the animal kingdom, I've seen first-hand how the young dog will copulate with his mother, and frequently seeks to kill his aging canine father who stands in his way. Cattle behave similarly, but in the dog eat dog (pardon the pun), Darwinian fight for survival, the moral absolutes seen in the Ten Commandments have been rendered irrelevant.

In this upside down philosophical mindset, wherein a moronic matriarchal figure thinks he can "lead from behind," the Social engineers believe that by controlling our environment, mankind can produce a global order without God, a Brave New Worldwherein peace and safety can supposedly be attained and sustained. The facts and history of Communism clearly contradicts such a jaundiced worldview, but the process of theDragonspeak Dialogue is not interested in facts, it is geared towards consensus:

"Consensus theory holds that truth is whatever is agreed upon, or in some versions, might come to be agreed upon, by some specified group" (Wikipedia website, truth, Consensus theory).

This flies directly in the face of the Word of God, which speaks of truth as an absolute, which is not dependent upon how many, or what qualitative attributes exist, among its adherents. God is God, and His existence and perfect righteousness has no dependency on how many believe in Him. Once mankind uncoupled his thinking from the moorings of absolute truth as found in the Patriarchal model, truth came to be seen as whatever consensus could be reached through dialogue – hence the phrase theDialogue to Consensus.

Furthermore, the absolute truth, as revealed in Scripture, will inevitably threaten any and all relationships which are not in total conformity to the truth – and the truth is categorically stated to be Jesus Christ:

"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me" (John 14:6).

This uniquely singular mode of salvation is opposed by the consensus, which always requires at least two, in order to conduct the Dialogue. This is found in Scripture as well, in one of many passages which speaks of the mystery of thirds, wherein two "parts" are destroyed, while a third is redeemed:

"And it shall come to pass, that in all the land [read all the world], saith the Lord, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein" (Zechariah 13:8).

The LORD goes on to say He will purify and redeem that third, through the Patriarchal prerogative already mentioned as chastisement, but the false prophets have hijacked the verse to try to apply it to some futuristic, literal military conflict. The two parts to be cut off are seen as any construct whoserelationship is threatened by the divine "third" - thus the two parts will invariably seek to kill the truth.

A basic example of this Spiritual principle is in order. WhenJesus was gaining ground throughout Judaea, the Jewish council known as the Sanhedrin (which consisted of the two rival factions known as Sadducees and Pharisees) sought to Dialogue among themselves in order to come to a consensus as to a course of action. Revealingly, the text tells us they perceived their relationship with Rome was threatened by the truth of the Gospel:

"Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees a council, and said, What do we? For this man doeth many miracles. If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation" (John 11:47,48).

Here we have the "two parts" – the requisite consensus -- consisting of the Jewish council, which had an accommodation (read relationship) with Rome, an unholy alignment in which the leaders perceived that Jesus (the truth) threatened that relationship. Since Rome and Judaea were both ultimately "cut off," it can truly be said that Christ is the righteous "third" which the LORD promised would glorify Him.