Either is likely to give performance far better than any pure-C++
solution, at the cost of some system-specific programming.

> There are a bunch of links to other garbage collectors at this site as well.
> (I'm not expert on garbage collecting, unless you count the stuff under the
> sink, I only point to others who claim it.)
>
> -gary-
>
> gary.powell_at_[hidden]
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jbandela_at_[hidden] [SMTP:jbandela_at_[hidden]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 5:25 PM
> > To: boost_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: [boost] An experimental garbage collector for C++ using
> > smart pointers
> >
> > I have posted an experimental garbage collector for C++. It is
> > written entirely in C++, and uses smart pointers. It uses both
> > reference counting and and mark-sweep. This is its first submission
> > and I am sure there are rough edges. I am interested in feedback on
> > whether this is a viable idea (even if the implementation needs
> > work), or if it is hopelessly and fundamentally flawed.
> >
> > Thanks for your time,
> >
> > John R. Bandela
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>