APPLICABLE TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION

“What the world needs now is less Jewish NWO
politically correct censorship and politically correct
infringing on the American Bill of Rights.”

Wow. Personally, I think that what the world needs now
is fewer asshole bigots.

If you were trying to offer a critique of Israeli
policy, of unquestioning US support for Israel, etc.,
I’d likely agree with much of it — well, if it came from
someone not disposed towards conspiracy theory as you
are. But this isn’t about the Middle East, it’s about
Jews like me supposedly trying to take away guns and
oppress others. That’s bigotry. You just made Stanley
very happy — I won’t give a grotesque description of it
— and I hope that he contacts you, his new ally.

I know that “NWO” stands for “New World Order,” so I
decided to see if “Jewish NWO” was a vogue phrase or
just something you made up. Here’s what I found through
Google (no links, just search result headlines and
occasionally a snippet, because I’m not linking to this
stuff):

“Putin is Jewish Pawn, says Russian Patriot –
henrymakow.com
Jan 3, 2013 – Tamara: “The photo at bottom left shows
Opposition to Putin saying Putin is 100% a Jew ( his
mother is a Jew and his father is a Jew). In Russia …”

You have in mind something you and others call the
“Jewish NWO” (“New World Order”). Not just a “new
world order” — a term that both Hitler and one of the
Presidents Bush employed — but a particular Jewish
one. If you meant support for Israel, then I’d have to
admit that a lot of Jews (though not necessarily a
majority) feel strongly about that, be they write or
wrong, and a lot of politicians cater to their
preferences. But you don’t: you talk about “Jewish
NWO” being “politically correct censorship and
politically correct infringing on the American Bill of
Rights.” This racially-based conspiracy about a
minority group trying to impede your rights puts you
in some longstanding and vile company; maybe you’re
heard the phrase “Anti-Semitism is the socialism of
fools.”

Your expressed concern above is what “people of that
persuasion are doing within American politics and
World politics.” Really? It bothers you more if Jews
are doing something you dislike in politics than if
other people are doing that thing? Why is that?

If you had just described what you dislike as a “New
World Order of politically correct censorship …” etc.
then I would have either considered it on its merits
or brushed it off with an eye-roll (having considered
it on its merits already.) But you didn’t — you
racialized the attack. You can search your own soul as
to why you did so and how that fits with your
self-perception as “NOT a BIGOT.”

You might start by asking yourself what if anything
you think is wrong with Fiala’s commentaries on Jews.

I presume that there is probably some analogy to
anti-Latino bigotry that might get the point across to
you, but I’m not going to go looking for it — because
I don’t particularly want to find it, and if I found
it, I don’t particularly want to publish it.

My guess is: the Brazilian with German roots, who
will choose the name “Pius.”

Wouldn’t be surprised by the Milanese Scalo, either,
in which case I’ll guess “Paul.”

"I’m not Catholic, though I’m married into a Catholic
family and am still on great terms with my Catholic
former in-laws, but to the extent I have the right to
an opinion I’m very pleased with this choice"..........
Hmmm Sounds familiar?