Who do you think knows more about science? The guy with the Harvard law degree and a couple years of experience as a social worker, or the guy with the Harvard law degree, Harvard MBA, and about 25 years of actual experience in industry?

Tough call. :

What? You mean Mitt 'Lets-fit-all-jumbo-jets-with-rolldown-windows' Romney has heard of science?_________________

juniper wrote:

you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.

Who do you think knows more about science? The guy with the Harvard law degree and a couple years of experience as a social worker, or the guy with the Harvard law degree, Harvard MBA, and about 25 years of actual experience in industry?

Tough call. :

What? You mean Mitt 'Lets-fit-all-jumbo-jets-with-rolldown-windows' Romney has heard of science?

The fact that you honestly believe he was serious says a lot about just how far gone you are. Is there anything the left-wing press says that you even bother to question?_________________Deja Moo: the feeling that you've heard this bull before

No Kennedys in this one, sorry. Except for Wannabe Kennedy (what's-his-name who looks like Frankenstein, from Massachusetts, who is Obama's debate sparring partner)._________________Deja Moo: the feeling that you've heard this bull before

The fact that you honestly believe he was serious says a lot about just how far gone you are.

It's hardly something to be flippant about. An onboard fire is deadly serious. So either he's just typically republitard stupid, or he's sadistically amused by lethal situations. I gave him the benefit of the doubt.

BoneKracker wrote:

Is there anything the left-wing press says that you even bother to question?

Is there anything the right-wing press says that you even bother to question?_________________

juniper wrote:

you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.

The question itself was already an ad hominem. One stemming from rank hypocrisy. There's no fallacy in pointing that out even though everyone already knows BK is the Fox boom box around here._________________

juniper wrote:

you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.

No, you question Obama, ad nausium, or rather repeat what Fox questions about him, even when they're, and by extension, you, are demonstrably wrong. Everything coming out of the red corner you take as gospel.

BoneKracker wrote:

Remember, you're the one who declared "the color red" to be a "scientific fact".

No, I 'declared' the colour red as particles of a specific spectra. And I'd never spell colour as "color"._________________

juniper wrote:

you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.

Who do you think knows more about science? The guy with the Harvard law degree and a couple years of experience as a social worker, or the guy with the Harvard law degree, Harvard MBA, and about 25 years of actual experience in industry?

Tough call. :

What? You mean Mitt 'Lets-fit-all-jumbo-jets-with-rolldown-windows' Romney has heard of science?

The fact that you honestly believe he was serious says a lot about just how far gone you are. Is there anything the left-wing press says that you even bother to question?

it wouldn't surprise me, though I know he wasn't serious in this instance. he's clearly smarter than some of his opponents were.