Thursday, August 3, 2017

Six Characteristics Define Today’s Stalinists and Explain Why Their Influence is So Large, Pavlova Says

Paul
Goble

Staunton, August 3 – “Stalinist,”
like many epithets, is not so much an explanation as something that needs to be
explained, US-based Russian historian Irina Pavlova says; and in a new post,
she argues that Stalinists are best understood as people who share five
particular and interrelated beliefs (ivpavlova.blogspot.com/2017/08/blog-post.html#more).

First of all, she says, a Stalinist
is someone who supports traditional Russian statehood and great power.Indeed, “the basis of Stalinism lies Russian
state traditions …as embodied in the rule of Ivan the Terrible.” During more liberal
periods in Russian history, these ideas have receded into the background somewhat,
but they have never disappeared.

“With Stalin, [these views] reached
their logical end point,” with the state viewing itself as surrounded by
enemies and having as its domestic task the establishment of tight control over
the population so that the country will not fall apart and as its foreign ones
increasing its influence and power and showing Russia to be a great power.

That means, Pavlova says, that “the
state in Russia is not the civil service [as is the case in other countries]
but [an independent] demiurge-power. Power itself is the highest value, it is always
primary and the people are always secondary, even though formally the Stalinist
declares the Russian multi-national people as the source of all power.”

Second, Pavlova continues, “a
Stalinist is a supporter of ethnic Russian state nationalism. The ideal of the Stalinist
is only a centralized and unitary state … [and] in this Russian picture of the
world, federation as a system of government organization is alien both to the supreme
power and to public consciousness,” whatever the country is called.

That view is widely shared in the
population and even among “various representatives of the so-called elite and
anti-Putin opposition,” the historian points out. Indeed, among both systemic
liberals and nationalists, “the majority are supporters of the great power
position and imperialists.”

Third, she says, “a Stalinist is a
supporter of government ownership and control not only of natural resources but
of industry and also of the active interference of the state in the development
of science, culture, the social sphere and health care.” Often Stalinists
criticize Putin for failing to carrying out “a new industrialization of the
country.”

Fourth, “a Stalinist is a supporter
of the development of military industry which in his language is always called
not military but defense. In reality, the purpose of this industry is entirely
different: not defense against an external enemy but the affirmation of the
status of Russia as a great power in the world by force of arms and the
militarization of his own country.”

Fifth, a Stalinist is someone whose
consciousness is opposed to law. “He may call for ‘the dictatorship of law,’
but the orders of the supreme power, as a rule, secret are for him always ‘higher
than formal legality,’” and he is quite prepared to use “illegal methods”
against corruption or other ills.

And sixth, “a Stalinist is a supporter
of social projects introduced ‘from above,’ be it socialism, democracy or a legal state.”
Thus, “calls to ‘build socialism in one country’” are for a Stalinist
equivalent to “calls to ‘build a democratic legal state.’ In any case, this
means actions ‘from above,’” and that inevitably involves “force and
repressions.”