viernes, 2 de junio de 2017

CATHOLIC BISHOPS BOW TO ATHEISTS

MASLOW TEACHES OUR PRIESTS AND BISHOPS

HOW TO GO TO HEAVEN

THE MOST INSIDIUS BETRAYAL OF JESUS SINCE JUDAS WHO BETRAYED JESUS.

The catholic bishops worldwide told Pope Benedict XVI that THEY DID NOT BELIEVE IN THE ORIGINAL SIN no more; they refused to teach it to the catholic world. Benedict XVI, in his famous general audience of Wednesday, December 3, 2008, begged them, IN VAIN, to teach the dogma of the Catholic Church. They refused. They had decided to teach the psychology of Abram Maslow (1908-1970) because they knew nothing of the psychology of Jesus. They never heard of the famous 46 parables of Jesus.

Maslow bases his psychology on the AUTORREALIZATION which is taking place in the person. It is named “The humanist psychology “Gelstadt”” which is the triumph of his autorrealization in the person. Thus, in this psychology, the person is born with all the potentials or the aptitudes needed to realize a complete success in society. The person needs no help from the outside world. Maslow made many enemies among psychologists, Freud, Karl Jung qualified his psychology “degrading”!

1)- God reveals to us that the child is born in sin. In his letter to the Romans 5:12, saint Paul reveals that WE ARE BORN in the possession of satan with the sin (the original sin) inherited from our first parents, Adam and Eve. Only God knows the relation he has with the sinner.

Catholic bishops worldwide deny the original sin, THEY REFUSE TO TEACH THE ORIGINAL SIN IN CATHOLIC SCHOOLS AND IN CHURCHES.

2)- Maslow teaches the child is born good. Maslow was an atheist; the supernatural did not exist. We cannot understand the catholic bishops choosing Maslow’s psychology to form catholic priest and bishops.

However, our bishops and priests teach the terrible apostasy from Maslow that the child is born good. If the child is born good, the child is born in the state of santifying grace since there is no neutral human being before Almighty God. Therefore the child needs no baptism since he is already a son of God. However, bishops baptize the child; they just don´t know why they do it.

3)-Jesus reveals to us in John 15:5 that “without him we can do nothing”. The child is born with nothing in his intellect. Without Jesus he can do nothing.

4)-Maslow and the catholic bishops teach that the child is born with all the potentials and aptitudes he needs to develop himself with great success. In his AUTORREALIZATION, Maslow shows how the child needs no help from outside to become a good citizen.

5)-THE PSYCHOLOGY OF JESUS IN HIS TEACHINGS AND ESPECIALLY IN HIS 46 PARABLES.

The psychology of Jesus is completely unknown in the church; bishops leading the fold forage in an unknown land, the land of Jesus Christ. Vice-President Pence a fallen away catholic had to leave the church to find Jesus. A catholic bishop contacted the vice-president not to talk about his faith and help him with catechism, but to talk about the “wall”.

Each parable is full of divine psychology. The parable of the good Samaritan describes how the leadership in the church went array. Jesus describes a catholic devastated at the hands of thieves and left by the wayside to die. A leader in the church, a bishop walks by with no compassion. He has nothing to offer to a dying. A levite, a priest walks by; he also has nothing to offer to a dying because like the bishop he has been educated in the same atheist school.

A stranger walks by and sees the dying person with compassion. He knows how the original sin with its devastating consequences, concupiscence, sufferings, ignorance, death, wounded this pilgrim of eternity and put him in great need of his Redeemer.

JESUS CHRIST THE REDEEMER IS UNKNOWN AMONG HIS PREFERRED, the baptized catholic, PEOPLE

The Catholic Church is in a terrible fight between Jesus Christ and Satan and Jesus is losing. Our bishops have no idea what is going wrong in the Church. They know catholics are leaving the church in droves. They need the Mexicans to fill-in the empty pews. Therefore, they voted in droves for Hilary Clinton to keep the borders open. President Obama´s corruption with his gender ideology and girls using same bathrooms as boys in public schools did not deter them. Pope Francis called “gender ideology” satanic but was asked not to make his condemnation public but to wait!

May we ask Pope Francis to help clean-up “the SWAMP" caused by enemies of Jesus in the catholic seminaries in Rome. Rome is the worst place to send a young seminarian to study for the catholic priesthood. Jesus is completely unknown in catholic universities. Rome is the hotbed of modern atheist psychologist forming our priests and bishops. Even the university of Rome refused permitting Pope Benedict XVI to meet with the students.

It is shameful to see our catholic church, founded by Jesus, being discarded and pushed out of existence by its own bishops and priests.

The crisis in the catholic church has been caused by the bishops and the priests who left the traditional catholic teachings. Islam is becoming the world religion. Jesus is organizing his whip and the blood of martyrs will tarnish our halls of fame.

Father Louis George Dupuis, S.T.L

For the benefit of our readers, I am printing the beautiful catechism of Pope Benedict XVI on the original sin.

POPE FRANCIS TEACHES GOD´S MERCY OPERATES MIRACLES IN THE REPENTING SINNERS. HOWEVER, GOD´S MERCY DOES NOT AUTHORIZE POPES AND BISHOPS TO AMEND GOD´S DIVINE REVELATION ESPECIALLY ON DOGMAS OF FAITH. To deprive the faithful of a sound knowledge of a dogma of faith like the original sin is a crime against God and the believers who have a right to know the doctrine of the original sin and its devastating consequences in each one of us. However, it appears our beloved Pope Francis will not help the bishops; he mentions the original sin but will not teach it.

Our bishops are men born with the original sin and in the snares of satan. JESUS SAVE YOUR CHURCH FROM DESTRUCTION. Following is the answer Benedict XVI gave to the bishops which was completely ignored by the bishops.

BENEDICT XVI

GENERAL AUDIENCE

Paul VI Audience HallWednesday, 3 December 2008

Saint Paul (15):

The Apostle’s teaching on the relation between Adam and Christ

The original sinin the teachings of saint Paul

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

In today's Catechesis we shall reflect on the relations between Adam and Christ, defined by St Paul in the well-known passage of the Letter to the Romans (5: 12-21)in which he gives the Church the essential outline of the doctrine on original sin.

Indeed, Paul had already introduced the comparison between our first progenitor and Christ while addressing faith in the Resurrection in the First Letter to the Corinthians: "For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.... "The first man Adam became a living being'; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit" (1 Cor 15: 22, 45). With Romans 5: 12-21, the comparison between Christ and Adam becomes more articulate and illuminating: Paul traces the history of salvation from Adam to the Law and from the latter to Christ. At the centre of the scene it is not so much Adam, with the consequences of his sin for humanity, who is found as much as it is Jesus Christ and the grace which was poured out on humanity in abundance through him. The repetition of the "all the more" with regard to Christ stresses that the gift received in him far surpasses Adam's sin and its consequent effects on humanity, so that Paul could reach his conclusion: "but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more" (Rm 5: 20). The comparison that Paul draws between Adam and Christ therefore sheds light on the inferiority of the first man compared to the prevalence of the second.

On the other hand, it is precisely in order to highlight the immeasurable gift of grace in Christ that Paul mentions Adam's sin. One could say that if it were not to demonstrate the centrality of grace, he would not have dwelt on the treatment of sin which "came into the world through one man and death through sin" (Rm 5: 12). For this reason, if, in the faith of the Church, an awareness of the dogma of original sin developed, it is because it is inseparably linked to another dogma, that of salvation and freedom in Christ. The consequence of this is that we must never treat the sin of Adam and of humanity separately from the salvific context, in other words, without understanding them within the horizon of justification in Christ.

However, as people of today we must ask ourselves:

what is this original sin?

What does St Paul teach?, what does the Church teach?

Is this doctrine still sustainable today?

Many think that in light of the history of evolution, there is no longer room for the doctrine of a first sin that then would have permeated the whole of human history. And, as a result, the matter of Redemption and of the Redeemer would also lose its foundation.

Therefore, does original sin exist or not?

In order to respond, we must distinguish between two aspects of the doctrine on original sin. There exists an empirical aspect, that is, a reality that is concrete, visible, I would say tangible to all. And an aspect of mystery concerning the ontological foundation of this event.

1)-The empirical fact is that a contradiction exists in our being. On the one hand every person knows that he must do good and intimately wants to do it. Yet at the same time he also feels the other impulse to do the contrary, to follow the path of selfishness and violence, to do only what pleases him, while also knowing that in this way he is acting against the good, against God and against his neighbour. In his Letter to the Romans St Paul expressed this contradiction in our being in this way: "I can will what is right, but I cannot do it. For I do not do the good I want, but I do the evil I do not want" (7: 18-19). This inner contradiction of our being is not a theory. Each one of us experiences it every day. And above all we always see around us the prevalence of this second will. It is enough to think of the daily news of injustice, violence, falsehood and lust. We see it every day. It is a fact.

As a consequence of this evil power in our souls, a murky river developed in history which poisons the geography of human history. Blaise Pascal, the great French thinker, spoke of a "second nature", which superimposes our original, good nature. This "second nature" makes evil appear normal to man. Hence even the common expression "he's human" has a double meaning. "He's human", can mean: this man is good, he really acts as one should act. But "he's human", can also imply falsity: evil is normal, it is human. Evil seems to have become our second nature. This contradiction of the human being, of our history, must evoke, and still evokes today, the desire for redemption. And, in reality, the desire for the world to be changed and the promise that a world of justice, peace and good will be created exists everywhere. In politics, for example, everyone speaks of this need to change the world, to create a more just world. And this is precisely an expression of the longing for liberation from the contradiction we experience within us.

Thus, the existence of the power of evil in the human heart and in human history is an undeniable fact. The question is: how can this evil be explained?

In the history of thought, Christian faith aside, there exists a key explanation of this duality, with different variations. This model says: being in itself is contradictory, it bears within it both good and evil. In antiquity, this idea implied the opinion that two equally primal principles existed: a good principle and a bad principle. This duality would be insuperable; the two principles are at the same level, so this contradiction from the being's origin would always exist. The contradiction of our beingwould therefore only reflect the contrary nature of the two divine principles, so to speak. In the evolutionist, atheistversion of the world the same vision returns in a new form. Although in this conception the vision of being is monist, it supposes that being as such bears within itself both evil and good from the outset. Being itself is not simply good, but open to good and to evil. Evil is equally primal with the good. And human history would develop only the model already present in all of the previous evolution. What Christians call original sin would in reality be merely the mixed nature of being, a mixture of good and evil which, according to atheist thought, belong to the same fabric of being. This is a fundamentally desperate view: if this is the case, evil is invincible. In the end all that counts is one's own interest. All progress would necessarily be paid for with a torrent of evil and those who wanted to serve progress would have to agree to pay this price. Politics is fundamentally structured on these premises and we see the effects of this. In the end, this modern way of thinking can create only sadness and cynicism.

And let us therefore ask again: what does faith witnessed to by St Paul tell us? As the first point, it confirms the reality of the competition between the two natures, the reality of this evil whose shadow weighs on the whole of Creation. We heard chapter seven of the Letter to the Romans, we shall add chapter eight. Quite simply, evil exists. As an explanation, in contrast with the dualism and monism that we have briefly considered and found distressing,

2)-faith tells us: there exist two mysteries, one of light and one of night, that is, however, enveloped by the mysteries of light.

The first mystery of light is this: faith tells us that there are not two principles, one good and one evil, but there is only one single principle, God the Creator, and this principle is good, only good, without a shadow of evil. And therefore, being too is not a mixture of good and evil; being as such is good and therefore it is good to be, it is good to live. This is the good news of the faith: only one good source exists, the Creator. Therefore living is a good, it is a good thing to be a man or a woman life is good. Then follows a mystery of darkness, or night. Evil does not come from the source of being itself, it is not equally primal.

Evil comes from a freedom created, from a freedom abused.

How was it possible, how did it happen? This remains obscure. Evil is not logical. Only God and good are logical, are light. Evil remains mysterious. It is presented as such in great images, as it is in chapter 3 of Genesis, with that scene of the two trees, of the serpent, of sinful man: a great image that makes us guess but cannot explain what is itself illogical. We may guess, not explain; nor may we recount it as one fact beside another, because it is a deeper reality. It remains a mystery of darkness, of night. But a mystery of light is immediately added. Evil comes from a subordinate source. God with his light is stronger. And therefore evil can be overcome. Thus the creature, man, can be healed. The dualist visions, including the monism of evolutionism, cannot say that man is curable; but if evil comes only from a subordinate source, it remains true that man is healable. And the Book of Wisdom says: "he made the nations of the world curable" (1: 14 Vulgate).

3)-GOD INTRODUCED HEALING: And finally, the last point: man is not only healable, but is healed de facto. God introduced healing. He entered into history in person. He set a source of pure good against the permanent source of evil. The Crucified and Risen Christ, the NEW ADAM, counters the murky river of evil with a river of light. And this river is present in history: we see the Saints, the great Saints but also the humble saints, the simple faithful. We see that the stream of light which flows from Christ is present, is strong.

Brothers and sisters, it is the season of Advent. In the language of the Church the word Advent has two meanings: presence and anticipation. Presence: the light is present, Christ is the new Adam, he is with us and among us. His light is already shining and we must open the eyes of our hearts to see the light and to enter into the river of light. Above all we must be grateful for the fact that God himself entered history as a new source of good. But Advent also means anticipation. The dark night of evil is still strong. And therefore in Advent we pray with the ancient People of God: "Rorate caeli desuper". And we pray insistently: come Jesus; come, give power to light and to good; come where falsehood, ignorance of God, violence and injustice predominate. Come Lord Jesus, give power to the good in the world and help us to be bearers of your light, peacemakers, witnesses of the truth. Come, Lord Jesus!