Dropouts Are Not Always Failures; The Schools Often Share the Blame

America's secondary-school educators cannot be satisfied with their
performance as long as substantial numbers of pupils are not graduating
from high school. While the national percentage of high-school
graduates has hovered at about 75 percent for two decades, the
depressing fact remains that in that same period 800,000 to 1-million
school-aged youths have annually forsaken the educational process. To
continue to allow legions of young Americans to leave school
unrecognized and unchallenged seems an incredible waste of human
resources.

The motives for this exodus are as varied as the leavers themselves.
But there is evidence that schools, themselves, cause many students to
drop out. The words of one recent dropout--"I never wanted to leave in
the first place, but I was made to feel inferior and stupid"--support
the educational psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner's contention that
schools are "one of the most potent breeding grounds of alienation in
American society."

Many general assumptions about school dropouts are inaccurate when
applied to a specific school and specific students. The stereotyped
image of the dropout as an illiterate, inarticulate, unmanageable
troublemaker simply was not borne out in a recent survey of dropouts at
an inner-city school in Massachusetts.

Over half of the dropouts interviewed had no record of disciplinary
infractions and only 17 percent were failing. More significantly, since
nearly 40 percent of the respondents were in college-preparatory
classes, it would appear that highly capable youngsters are also being
turned off and out.

It is important to note that little research on dropouts has
concerned itself directly with the dropout, other than in terms of
numbers and percentages of school leavers. The idea, though, of a
school utilizing input from its own dropouts as a basis for improving
its programs, as well as its efforts to reduce dropout rates, is
essential for schools to gain a clear understanding of the problem.
When assured of anonymity, dropouts are more willing to participate in
surveys than might be anticipated, as the 42-percent response rate in
the Worcester, Mass., study suggests.

The ex-pupils were willing to offer their perceptions of school and
staff members and to propose solutions to school problems. Some leavers
even wrote comments on the margins of the survey sheets, ranging from
"Stop kicking kids out of school" to "I hope you can keep a lot more
kids in school by changing some things."

The study found two factors to have the highest correlation to
dropping out--high absenteeism and nonparticipation in school
activities. Nearly 70 percent of the students surveyed admitted to
excessive absenteeism, while 80 percent said they never participated in
any school activities. Such statistics reflect the primary
manifestation of a defense strategy commonly employed by students to
counteract an alienating school environment--they avoid it.

When asked why they had left school, nearly 80 percent of the
dropouts offered reasons directly associated with factors in the
school: a general dislike of school, feelings of boredom, a sense of
not learning anything, problems with teachers, poor marks, and problems
with administrators.

For many of the leavers, the act of departing was simply the
culmination of a natural progression initiated upon their enrollment:
"I felt like an outsider," "I felt uncomfortable," or "I felt like I
didn't belong."

More than 40 percent of the school leavers viewed the teacher-pupil
relationship as an adversary situation, one culminating in the
teachers' use of grades "as a way to get back at students." Dropouts
used such terms as "put you down," "put you aside," or "gave me a hard time" to suggest that they felt rejected by their teachers. Convinced
that there were no adults in school to whom they could turn, it is not
surprising that 72 percent of the dropouts did not consult with any
school personnel prior to leaving.

More than 70 percent of the leavers said they might have stayed if
school had been different, particularly "if teachers paid more
attention to students," "if we were treated as students, not as
inmates," and if teachers made it fun to learn.

Thirteen percent stated emphatically that they would not return to
school under any circumstances: "I just don't want to go back," "My
interest is lost," "The system is too far gone," and "It's too late for
me as well as for others I know who were treated badly," were typical
comments.

In dealing with their anxieties, pupils are often reinforced in the
feeling that somehow they are to blame for the existing situation.
Tragically, there are teachers who encourage pupils not to come to
school because they are too much trouble. And there are administrators
who turn a deaf ear to potential dropouts because too often they equate
their effectiveness as administrators simply with quiet in the halls.
The very people and institutions that propose to help youths, find
themselves becoming, in reality, instruments that further pupils'
feelings of anxiety, frustration, and blame. The great danger is that
the students then accept the prevailing judgment of their
unacceptability. But some do, saying, for example, "Sometimes I
deserved trouble," "... that ain't the teachers' fault, it's my fault,"
and "School's O.K., the one that was wrong was me."

Little good can be achieved by simply returning the dropouts to the
environments from which they have fled. Educators must strive to
develop within the schools the means to counter some of the forces
influencing pupils to drop out. Dropouts visualize themselves as
powerless and uninvolved in school decisions, mere residents who have
no input into the day-to-day activities that affect their lives. What
they want from school staff members is mutual respect, greater
understanding, fair treatment, and a willingness to listen. They are
particularly sensitive to being ignored, treated rudely or unfairly, or
being made to feel inadequate.

Schools have failed to address the needs of dropouts. But the
"solutions" proposed by dropouts themselves appear deceptively
attainable. The ingredients of a school environment that would reduce
the number of dropouts is a reiteration of what constitutes desirable
and effective education under any circumstances. Educators should
accept the dropouts' challenge. The improvement in school climate that
will result from serious consideration of the dropouts' concerns will
benefit all who participate in the educational process. It would seem
worth pursuing.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.