The Tao of Anarchy: There is no God. There is no State. They are all superstitions that are established by the power-hunger psychopaths to divide, rule, and enslave us. It's only you and me, we are all true and real existence though in one short life. That is, We all are capable to freely interact with one another without coercion from anyone. We all are capable to take self-responsibility to find ways to live with one another in liberty, equality, harmony, and happiness before leaving this world forever. We all were born free and equal among all beings on this planet. We are not imprisoned in and by a place with a political name just because we were born there by chance. We are not chained to a set of indoctrinated beliefs that have been imposed upon us by so-called traditions. This Planet is home to all of us. No one owns it. We share the benefits from and responsibility to this Earth. We pledge no oath, no allegiance to no one; submit to no authority. We are all free and equal. The only obligation we all must undertake constantly with consistency is to respect the same freedoms and rights of others.

In 2011, the U.S. regime, then under a different nominal leader than in the Iraq invasion, invaded and destroyed
Libya — also on the basis of lies that its press (which is controlled
by the same billionaires who control the nation’s two political Parties)
stenographically published from the Government and refused ever to
expose as being lies.

On February 8th, the Latin American Geopolitical Strategic Center (CELAG) issued their study, “The Economic Consequences of the Boycott of Venezuela”,
and reported that throughout the five-year period of 2013-2017,
Venezuela’s “economy and society suffered a suffocation [of] $ 22.5
billion in annual revenues, as a result of a deliberate international
strategy of financial isolation [of Venezuela]. Evidently, this
financial pressure intensified since 2015 with the fall in the price of
crude oil.” So: that’s a total loss of over $112 billion from Venezuela
during the entire 5-year period, and the result has become (especially
after 2014) the impoverishment of the country. The U.S. regime and its
allies and their propaganda-media blame, for that, not themselves, but
the very same Government they’re trying to take down. The U.S. regime
and its allies have contempt for the public everywhere. The more that
Venezuelans blame their own Government for this impoverishment, instead
of blame America’s Government for it, the more that their exploiters
will have contempt for them, but also the more that their exploiters
will benefit from them, because the exploiters’ taking control of the
Government will then be much easier to do.

The U.S-and-allied exploiters are attempting to install in Venezuela a
man who has absolutely no justification under the Venezuelan
Constitution to be claiming to be the country’s ‘interim President’.
For some mysterious reason, Venezuela’s President isn’t calling for
that traitor to be brought up on charges of treachery — attempting a
coup — and facing Venezuela’s Supreme Judicial Tribunal on such a
charge, which Tribunal is the Constitutionally authorized body to
adjudicate that matter. So, Venezuela’s Government is incompetent — but
so too have been all of its predecessors since at least 1980, and
incompetence alone is not Constitutional grounds for replacing Venezuela’s President by a foreign-imposed coup. At least Venezuela’s actual President is no traitor, such as his would-be successor, Juan Guaido, definitely is.

Did Venezuela invade America so as for America’s economic war against it
to be justified? Did Iraq invade America so as for America’s
destruction of it to be justified? Did Libya invade America so as for
America’s destruction of it to be justified? Did Syria invade America so
as for America’s destruction of it to be justified? Did Ukraine invade
America so as for America’s destruction of it to be justified? None of
them did, at all. In each and every case, it was pure aggression, by
America, the international rogue nation.

Back
in 1986, regarding America’s international relations including its
coups and invasions, the U.S. quit the International Court of Justice
(ICJ), when that Court ruled against the U.S. in the Iran-Contra case, Nicaragua v. United States,
which concerned America’s attempted coup in that country. But though
the U.S. propaganda-media reported the Government’s rejection of that
verdict in favor of Nicaragua, they hid the more momentous fact: the
U.S. Government stated that it would not henceforth recognize any
authority in the ICJ concerning America’s international actions. The
public didn’t get to know about that. Ever since 1986, the U.S.
Government has been a rogue regime, simply ignoring the ICJ except when
the ICJ could be cited against a country that the U.S. regime is trying
to destroy (‘democratize’). And then, when the ICJ ruled on 9 March 2005
against the U.S. regime in a U.S. domestic matter where the regime
refused to adhere to the U.S. Constitution’s due-process clause
regarding the prosecutions and death-sentences against 51 death-row
inmates, and the Court demanded retrials of those convicts, the U.S. regime, in 2005, simply withdrew completely from the jurisdiction of the ICJ.
Ever since 9 March 2005, the U.S. regime places itself above, and
immune to, international law, regarding everything. George W. Bush
completed what Ronald Reagan had started.

This rogue regime has no real legitimacy even as a representative of the American people. It doesn’t really represent the American public at all. It is destroying the world and lying through its teeth all the while. Its puppet-rulers on behalf of America’s currently 585 billionaires
are not in prison from convictions by the International Court of
Justice in the Hague. They’re not even being investigated by the
International Court of Justice in the Hague. That’s a U.N. agency. Does
the U.N. have any real legitimacy, under such circumstances as this? Can
an international scofflaw simply refuse to recognize the authority of
the international court? This mocks the U.N. itself. The U.S. places
itself above the U.N.’s laws and jurisdiction and yet still occupies one
of the five permanent seats on the U.N’s Security Council and still is
allowed to vote in the U.N.’s General Assembly. Why doesn’t the U.N.
simply expel America? It can’t be done? Then why isn’t a new
international legal body being established to replace the U.N. — and being granted legal authority everywhere regardless
of whether a given national regime acknowledges its legal authority
over matters of international law? Why is Venezuela being
internationally isolated and sanctioned, instead of the U.S. being
internationally isolated and sanctioned?

On
top of all that, this is the same U.S. regime that has blocked the Paris
Agreement on Climate Change, and that has broken one international
agreement after another — not only NAFTA, and not only the nuclear
agreement on Iran, and not only many nuclear agreements with first the
Soviet Union and then Russia, but lots more — and all with total
impunity.

And
it’s not only the countries that the U.S. invades or otherwise
destroys, which are being vastly harmed by this international
monster-regime. How many millions of the flood of asylum-seekers who are
pouring into Europe have done that in order to reach safety from
America’s bombs and proxy-troops — jihadists and fascist terrorists —
which have ravaged their own homelands? What is that flood of refugees
doing to Europe, and to European politics — forcing it ever-farther to
the right and so tearing the EU apart? Why are not Europeans therefore
flooding their own streets with anti-American marches and movements for
their own Governments to impose economic sanctions against all major
American brands, and demanding prosecution of all recent American
Presidents, starting at least with G.W. Bush — or else to vote out of
office any national politicians who refuse to stand up against the
American bully-regime?

It isn’t only weak nations such as Nigeria that are corrupt and rotten to the core. The entire U.S. empire, and especially its U.S. masters, are.

How
much more will the peoples of the world remain suckers to the vast
corporate propaganda-operation by that out-of-control beast of a
rapacious regime, which displays the Orwellian nerve to label as being a
‘regime’ each and every Government that it seeks to overthrow and to
call itself a ‘democracy’?
The U.S. regime is itself actually allied the most closely with the
world’s most barbaric rulers, the Saud family, that own Saudi Arabia.
The U.S. regime is also allied with the apartheid and internationally
aggressive regime in Israel. Is such an international gang, as this is,
going to get off scot-free, as if there were no international law — or
at least none that applies to itself?

And,
if the U.S. regime is so concerned to ‘protect democracy’ and ‘protect
human rights’ all over the world (as that perennially lying bunch always
claim to be the ‘justification’ for their invasions and coups), then
why isn’t it starting first by prosecuting itself? (Or, maybe, by
prosecuting Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman al-Saud, for his many
crimes — and prosecuting his predecessors for financing the 9/11 attacks
against Americans?) Well, of course, Hitler didn’t do anything of the
sort. (Nor did he prosecute his allies.) He set the standard. Maybe,
ideologically, Hitler and Mussolini and Hirohito actually won the war,
though this has happened after they first physically lost what everyone
had thought was the end of WW II. After all, nobody is
prosecuting the U.S. regime today. Isn’t that somewhat like a global
victory for fascism — the Axis powers — after the fact? Maybe “we” won
the war, only to lose it later. Doesn’t that appear to be the case?
Mussolini sometimes called fascism “corporationism”,
and this is how it always functions, and functions today by agreement
amongst the controlling owners of international corporations that are
headquartered in the U.S. and in its vassal-nations abroad.

Is this to go on interminably? When will this international reign of fascism end?

What
would happen if all the rest of the world instituted an international
legal and enforcement system (under a replacement U.N.) in which all
commitments and contractual proceeds to benefit American-based
international corporations and the U.S. Government were declared to be
immediately null and void — worthless except as regards the claims against
the U.S. entities? (The owners of those entities have been the
beneficiaries of America’s international crimes.) Contracts can be
unilaterally nullified. The U.S. Government does it all the time, with
no justification except lies. Here, it would be done as authentically
justifiable penalties, against actually massive global crimes.

The
U.S. militarily occupies the world; this is a global empire; it has over
a thousand military bases worldwide. Why aren’t the people in all of
those occupied countries demanding their own governments simply to throw
them out — to end the military occupation of their land?

You
can’t have a world at peace, and anything like international justice,
without enforcing international law. This is what doing that would look
like.

What we know right now is actually a lawless world. That’s what every international gangster wants.