☐ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended:

☒ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from January 1,
2018 through March 31, 2018

Commission File No. 000-55925

AERKOMM INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in
its charter)

Nevada

46-3424568

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

923 Incline Way #39, Incline Village,
NV 89451

(Address of principal executive offices)

(877) 742-3094

(Registrant’s telephone number, including
area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0,001 par value per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of
delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment
to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,”
and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐

Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐ (do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ☒

Emerging growth company ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate
by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2017 (the last business
day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the shares of the registrant’s
common stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing price of such shares as reported on The OTCQB Market) was approximately
$65,741,478. Shares of the registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person
who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from the calculation in that such persons may be deemed
to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other
purposes.

There were a total of 41,460,097 shares
of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of April 27, 2018.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

EXPLANATORY
NOTE REGARDING THIS TRANSITION REPORT

On March 18, 2018, we changed
our fiscal year from the period beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31 to the period beginning on April 1 and ending
on March 31. As a result, this report on Form 10-KT is a transition report and includes financial information for the transition
period from January 1, 2018 through March 31, 2018 (the “Transition Period”). Subsequent to this report, our reports
on Form 10-K will cover the fiscal year, April 1 to March 31, which will be our fiscal year.

In addition to historical information,
this annual transition report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. We
use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “target,”
“plan,” “optimistic,” “intend,” “aim,” “will” or similar expressions
which are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
concerning the following:

the effects of increased competition in our market and our ability to compete effectively;

●

our plans to use the proceeds from this offering;

●

our expectations concerning relationship with customers and other third parties;

●

the attraction and retention of qualified employees and key personnel;

●

future acquisitions of our investments in complementary companies or technologies; and

●

our ability to comply with evolving legal standards and regulations.

These forward-looking statements are subject
to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere
in this report. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment, and new risks emerge from time to
time. It is not possible for us to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent
to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed
in this annual transition report may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated
or implied in our forward-looking statements.

You should not rely upon forward-looking
statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements
are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances described
in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for
the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking
statements for any reason after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations,
except as required by law.

You should read this report and the documents
that we reference in this report and have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, with the understanding
that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances may be materially different from what
we expect.

This report includes market and industry
data that has been obtained from third-party sources, including industry publications, as well as industry data prepared by our
management on the basis of its knowledge of and experience in the industries in which we operate (including our management’s
estimates and assumptions relating to such industries based on that knowledge). Management’s knowledge of such industries
has been developed through its experience and participation in these industries. While our management believes the third-party
sources referred to in this annual transition report are reliable, neither we nor our management have independently verified any
of the data from such sources referred to in this report or ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon by such
sources. Internally prepared and third-party market forecasts, in particular, are estimates only and may be inaccurate, especially
over long periods of time. Furthermore, references in this report to any publications, reports, surveys or articles prepared by
third parties should not be construed as depicting the complete findings of the entire publication, report, survey or article.
The information in any such publication, report, survey or article is not incorporated by reference in this report.

iii

Use of Terms

Except as otherwise indicated by the context
and for the purposes of this report only, references in this report to:

●

“we,” “us,” “our,” or “our company,” are to the combined business of Aerkomm Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries;

●

“Aircom” are to Aircom Pacific, Inc., a California corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of our company;

●

“Aircom Seychelles” are to Aircom Pacific Ltd., a Republic of Seychelles company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Aircom;

●

“Aircom HK” are to Aircom Pacific Inc. Limited, a Hong Kong company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Aircom;

●

“Aircom Japan” are to Aircom Japan, Inc., a Japanese company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Aircom;

●

“Aircom Taiwan” are to Aircom Telecom LLC, a Taiwanese company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Aircom;

Stock Split

On January 9, 2017, we completed a 1-for-10
reverse split of our issued and outstanding common stock. Accordingly, all share and per share information in this report has been
adjusted to give retroactive effect to such reverse split.

iv

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS.

Overview

With advanced technologies and a unique
business model, we, as a service provider of in-flight entertainment and connectivity, or IFEC, solutions, intend to provide airline
passengers with a broadband in-flight experience that encompasses a wide range of service options. Such options include Wi-Fi,
cellular, movies, gaming, live TV, and music. We plan to offer these core services, which we are currently still developing, through
both built-in in-flight entertainment systems, such as a seat-back display, as well as on passengers’ personal devices. We
also expect to provide content management services and e-commerce solutions.

We plan to partner with airlines and offer
airline passengers free IFEC services. We expect to generate revenue through advertising and in-flight transactions. We believe
that this is an innovative approach that differentiates us from existing market players.

To complement and facilitate our planned
IFEC service offerings, we intend to build satellite ground stations and related data centers within the geographic regions where
we expect to be providing IFEC airline services. Initially, we are planning to build our first ground station and data center in
the Asia region, subject to the availability of sufficient capital and an appropriate ground location.

Our Corporate History and Structure

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada
on August 14, 2013 under the name Maple Tree Kids, Inc. At the time of our incorporation, our sole officer and director, Ms. Irina
Goldman, subscribed for and purchased 100,000 (1,000,000 pre-Reverse Split) shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.001
per share.

We were incorporated in order to acquire
by merger all of the limited liability company interests of Maple Tree Kids LLC, a Vermont limited liability company, or MTK LLC.
Ms. Goldman had personally acquired all of the limited liability company interests of MTK LLC for a total purchase price of $8,800
on August 16, 2013. MTK LLC then merged with and into our company on September 27, 2013. Our company was the surviving company
in the merger and the separate existence of MTK LLC ceased and we succeeded to all of the assets of MTK LLC as a result of the
merger. At the effective time of the merger, each limited liability company percentage interest in MTK LLC held by Ms. Goldman
was automatically changed and converted into one thousand shares of our common stock. Since Ms. Goldman owned 100% of the limited
liability company interests in MTK LLC at the time of the merger, she received a total of 100,000 shares of our common stock as
a result of the merger. In addition, on September 26, 2013, Ms. Goldman converted $5,000 of indebtedness that our company owed
to her into shares of common stock by cancelling such debt in exchange for a total of 500,000 shares of our common stock pursuant
to a subscription agreement dated as of such date.

On December 28, 2016, Aircom purchased
all 700,000 shares of our common stock held by Ms. Goldman, for $320,000, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement among Aircom,
Ms. Goldman and our company, dated as of such date. Such shares represented approximately 86.3% of our issued and outstanding common
stock as of the closing. Accordingly, as a result of the transaction, Aircom became the controlling stockholder of our company.
Ms. Goldman resigned as our sole director and officer upon closing of this stock purchase transaction and appointed Mr. Jeffrey
Wun as our sole director and our President, Treasurer and Secretary.

On January 10, 2017, we changed our name
to Aerkomm Inc. in anticipation of our new business and the completion of the reverse acquisition described below. On that date,
we also effectuated a one for ten reverse split of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

On February 13, 2017, Aerkomm entered into
a share exchange agreement (“the Exchange Agreement”) with Aircom and its shareholders, pursuant to which Aerkomm acquired
100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Aircom in exchange for approximately 99.7% of the issued and outstanding capital
stock of Aerkomm (or 87.8% on a fully-diluted basis). As a result of the share exchange, Aircom became a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Aerkomm, and the former shareholders of Aircom became the holders of approximately 99.7% of Aerkomm’s issued and outstanding
capital stock. For accounting purposes, the share exchange transaction with Aircom was treated as a reverse acquisition, with Aircom
as the acquirer and the Company as the acquired party. Unless the context suggests otherwise, when we refer in this report to business
and financial information for periods prior to the consummation of the reverse acquisition, we are referring to the business and
financial information of Aircom and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Upon the closing of the reverse acquisition
on February 13, 2017, Mr. Jeffrey Wun, our sole director and President, Treasurer and Secretary, resigned from his positions as
President, Treasurer and Secretary. On the same date, the following persons were appointed to our board of directors: Peter Chiou,
Jan-Yung Lin, Colin Lim and Barbie Shih. In addition, Peter Chiou was appointed as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President.

On December 29, 2017, stockholders of the
Company holding 33,230,902 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, or approximately 80.15% of the outstanding common
stock of the Company, voted by written consent in lieu of an annual meeting to elect the following six (6) persons to the board
of directors of the Company to serve until the Company’s next annual meeting or until their resignations are duly tendered
and accepted: Jeffrey Wun, Jan-Yung Lin, Colin Lim, Raymond Choy, Chih-Ming (Albert) Hsu, and James J. Busuttil. Peter Chiou, Barbie
Shih and Robert Lu were not re-elected to the Company’s board of directors under the stockholders’ written consent
in lieu of annual meeting.

1

On December 30, 2017, the Company’s
board of directors by unanimous written consent appointed Mr. Jeffrey Wun as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
effective December 31, 2017. Mr. Chiou resigned from these positions, effective December 31, 2017, and is expected to become a
consultant to the Company for a short period of time. On January 22, 2018, our board of directors appointed Mr. Wun as its chairman.

As a result of our acquisition of Aircom,
we now own all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Aircom, which is an IFEC service provider. Aircom was incorporated
in the State of California on September 29, 2014. It owns all of the equity interests of Aircom Seychelles, Aircom HK, Aircom Japan
and Aircom Telecom LLC (Taiwan).

We are a holding company. All of our business
operations are conducted through our several operating subsidiaries. The chart below presents our corporate structure as of the
date of this report:

Aircom Pacific, Inc. is our wholly owned
operating subsidiary through which all of our operational and core business activities are run.

On October 17, 2016, Aircom acquired Aircom
HK for $100,000. Aircom HK is a Hong Kong limited company formed on October 3, 2008 as Yanwei Information Technology Limited. Aircom
HK changed its name to Dadny Inc Limited on July 22, 2015 and changed its name again to Aircom Pacific Inc. Limited on July 22,
2015. Aircom HK is in charge of all of Aircom’s business and operations in Hong Kong and China. Aircom HK is applying for,
and will be the holder of a Validation of Supplemental Type Certificate, or VSTC, issued by the Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department,
or HKCAD. Presently, Aircom HK’s primary function is business development, both with respect to airlines as well as content
providers and advertising partners based in Hong Kong and China. It is also actively seeking strategic partnerships in those areas,
through which Aircom may leverage its product offerings to provide enhanced services to prospective customers. Aircom also plans
to provide local support to Hong Kong-based airlines via Aircom HK and Aircom HK owned teleports located in Hong Kong.

On December 12, 2016, Aircom acquired Aircom
Japan for $600,000. Aircom Japan was formed under the laws of Japan on August 29, 2011 as Dadny (Japan) Inc. and changed its name
to Aircom Japan, Inc. on July 1, 2016. Aircom Japan is responsible for Aircom’s business development efforts and general
operations located within Japan. Aircom Japan is applying for, and will be the holder of, a Satellite Communication Blanket License,
which is necessary for Aircom to provide services within Japan. Aircom Japan will also provide local support to airlines operating
within the territory of Japan. We do not expect to be in a position to successfully launch our service offerings in Japan until
sometime in 2019.

Aircom Seychelles was formed by Aircom
under the laws of Seychelles on December 15, 2009 as Gulach Ltd. and changed its name to Aircom Pacific Ltd. on August 19, 2014.
Aircom Seychelles was formed to facilitate Aircom’s global corporate structure for both business operations and tax planning.
Presently, Aircom Seychelles has no operations. Aircom is working with corporate and tax advisers in finalizing its global corporate
structure and has not yet concluded its final plan of organization.

Aircom Taiwan, which became a wholly owned
subsidiary of Aircom in December 2017, was organized under the laws of Taiwan on June 29, 2016. During 2017, Aircom advanced a
total of $460,000 (the “Prepayment”) to Aircom Telecom LLC, or Aircom Taiwan, a Taiwan limited liability company that
was not affiliated with Aircom during that time, for working capital, as part of a planned $1,500,000 aggregate equity investment
(the “Equity Investment”) in Aircom Taiwan. Aircom Taiwan acted as Aircom’s agent in Taiwan. Before Aircom Taiwan
was allowed to issue equity to Aircom, because Aircom, a foreign investor, the Equity Investment must be approved by the Investment
Review Committee of the Ministry of Economic affairs of Taiwan (the “Committee”). Aircom entered into an Equity Pre-Subscription
Agreement with Aircom Taiwan dated as of August 13, 2017, to memorialize the terms of the Equity Investment. On December 19, 2017,
the Committee approved Aircom’s initial Equity Investment (valued as of that date at NT$15,150,000, or approximately US$500,000)
and the purchase of the founding owner’s total equity of NT$100,000 (approximately US$3,350). As a result of the approval
of the Equity Investment, Aircom Taiwan is now a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of Aircom.

Aircom Taiwan is responsible for Aircom’s
business development efforts and general operations within Taiwan. We are currently planning to locate the site of our first
ground station in Taiwan and we expect that if we raise sufficient funds to move forward with this project (although that cannot
be guaranteed), Aircom Taiwan will play a significant role in building and operating that ground station.

Our principal executive offices are located
at 923 Incline Way #39, Incline Village, NV 89451. The telephone number at our principal executive office is (877) 742-3094.

2

Our Industry

According to William Blair’s equity
report titled “The Internet of Everything,” dated January 30, 2017, commercial in-flight connectivity, or IFC, is a
rapidly growing $6 billion market. Global industry penetration of commercial aircraft installed with IFC has grown from less than
1% in 2008 to 25% in 2016, with the expectation of 60%-plus by 2022. Industry growth should occur from not only increased penetration,
but also expected increases in the average revenue generated per aircraft.

The global IFEC market is expected to experience
high growth due to factors such as aircraft expansion, increasing passenger rates, rising penetration rates, and technological
advances. The global IFEC market revenue was forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 49.7% (2013 Global Industry
Analyst Report). The Asia-Pacific region is expected to experience more rapid growth because of the demand from a huge population.
Boeing estimates that commercial aircraft will increase from 22,510 planes in 2015 to more than 45,000 in 2035, according to its
2016 market report.

Our Business Model

We believe that our business model sets
us apart from our competitors. We combine cutting-edge connectivity technology with a unique content-driven approach. Traditionally,
providers of in-flight connectivity focus primarily on the profit margin derived from the sale of hardware to airlines and of bandwidth
to passengers. Both airlines and passengers have to “pay to play,” which results in low participation and usage rates.
We break away from this model and set a new trend with our business model, under which neither airlines nor passengers need to
pay for products or services. Furthermore, our business plan will provide our future airline partners with an opportunity to participate
in our revenue sharing model. Taken together, this novel approach creates incentive for the airlines to work with us while driving
passenger usage rates to levels management believes could reach 90% or more, considering the fact that many passengers now carry
more than one smart device.

Our main source of revenue is expected
to be derived from the content channeled through our network. In other words, we plan to use connectivity as a tool rather than
as a commodity for sale, which we believe will allow us to achieve a greater return. By providing free connectivity and a large
volume of content, we believe that we will generate a multiplying effect that will result in a value that exceeds the “sum
of its parts.” Through our extended products, continuously expanding content network, and integrated service, we expect to
deliver a total end-to-end solution for our customers, along with uninterrupted professional and social life to passengers during
air travel.

We expect that our business will generate
revenue primarily through revenue sharing with select partners. Our revenue partners include Internet companies, content providers,
advertisers, telecom service providers, e-commerce, and premium sponsors. In addition, we expect to generate income from selling
premium access passes to frequent flyers which would enable the holders to access our network with less restrictions and fewer
interruptions from advertisement.

We expect to launch our business offerings
in 2018, initially in China or Southeast Asia. We may expand our operations to other international markets if we determine
that we can compete in such markets.

Our IFEC Solutions

We plan to provide airline passengers with
a broadband in-flight experience that encompasses a wide range of service options. Such options include Wi-Fi, cellular, movies,
gaming, live TV, and music. We plan to offer our services through both built-in in-flight entertainment systems, such as a seatback
display, as well as on passengers’ personal devices. We also plan to provide related content management services and on-board
e-commerce solutions.

Our Connectivity Solutions

We expect to bring connectivity on-board
aircraft with communication satellites. As depicted in the diagram below, aircraft equipped with connectivity instruments can communicate
with satellites via an airborne antenna. The satellite then relays the information to a ground station, which is equipped with
a high-power satellite dish and is connected to the internet through our proprietary ground system.

3

Satellites can communicate on different
microwave frequency bands. The higher the frequency, the faster the rate at which data transmits. However, higher frequency waves
are more susceptible to interference from the environment, such as rain fade. Most in-flight connectivity systems currently rely
on the Ku-band for communication, though many players in the market are working to provide higher bandwidth and faster transmitting
rates using the Ka-band. However, there are few Ka-enabled satellites, which limits the coverage area. We are developing a hybrid
Ka/Ku satellite communication system that enables a high throughput where Ka-band coverage is available and offers global coverage
where it is not. Our policy engine will make near real-time decisions based on best available bandwidth to choose between Ka and
Ku-bands. In an area where Ka and Ku-band coverage overlaps, our airborne system can use both Ka and Ku-band bandwidth or choose
the best option based on capacity, cost, and loading. It can also roam seamlessly between Ka and Ku-band satellites when the aircraft
is moving in to or out of the Ka-band coverage area.

Our dual band system architecture brings
our airline customers and their passengers the benefits of both Ka and Ku-band satellite technology. The Ka-band increases data
throughput, while the Ku-band offers reliable service outside of the Ka-band coverage area or when Ka-band is not available due
to weather or other interference.

In July 2015, we entered into a digital
transmission service agreement with Asia Satellite Telecommunications Company Limited, or AsiaSat, for use of its AsiaSat 7 and
8 satellites, which provide access to both Ku and Ka-bands in China and Southeast Asia, for the provision of telecommunication
services, including internet service. This agreement runs for a period of three years from its date of commencement, December 31,
2015. We paid AsiaSat a deposit of $775,000, which will be held by AsiaSat as security for our payment obligations and which AsiaSat
may apply towards any defaults in such obligations. We are required to pay AsiaSat an annual service fee of $3,100,000, on a quarterly
basis. The contract was subsequently suspended and both sides reached a settlement with respect to the Agreement in July 2017.
Please also see “Legal Proceedings” below.

In March 2017, we entered into a Master
Service Agreement with SKY Perfect JSAT Corporation for use of its JCSAT-2B/Asia Beam Ku-band satellite telecommunication services,
teleport services and housing services. The agreement’s initial term runs for a period of three years from its commencement
date of April 15, 2017, subject to the receipt of all governmental licenses and approval, and will continue be effective provided
any of the services continues after the initial term. We are required to prepay $285,300 and a security deposit plus applicable
Japanese consumption tax upon commencement date.

4

We are actively working with other satellite
providers in order to accommodate airlines’ global routes and growing fleets. We are monitoring the satellite industry for
growth in coverage, with recent attention on China Satcom’s plan to launch high-capacity Ka-band and Ka HTS multispot-beam
satellites over the Asia Pacific region.

We plan to provide airline partners with
the equipment necessary for in-flight connectivity, which is to be installed by the maintenance, repair, and overhaul service provider,
or MRO, selected by the airline. The main components of each installation kit include a radome, one antenna each for Ka and Ku-band,
a modem, servers, and wireless access points, among others. The complete bill of materials encompasses more than 5,000 individual
parts and components. All components of the installation kit will require a Supplemental Type Certificate, or STC, from the U.S.
Federal Aviation Administration, or FAA, or its equivalents in the relevant jurisdiction. For aircraft outside of the FAA’s
jurisdiction, an additional VSTC for the jurisdiction is required. Each aircraft type requires its own STC and VSTC as needed.
For example, a STC for an Airbus A320 would not permit us to install the same equipment onboard a Boeing 737.

On October 15, 2014, our subsidiary, Aircom,
entered into an agreement with dMobile System Co., Ltd. (“dMobile”), a Taiwanese corporation whose Chairman of the
Board is Daniel Shih, our co-founder, a former material beneficial owner of our common stock and the husband of Barbie Shih, one
of our former directors, for the delivery to dMobile of ground station equipment to be resold to Priceplay Taiwan Inc. (“PPTW”),
of which Mr. Shih may be a deemed beneficial owner. According to the terms of this agreement, the purchase price for the initial
system was $10,202,455, which was reduced to $6,980,000 on March 10, 2015. We delivered the initial system to dMobile on October
20, 2015 and the purchase price receivable from dMobile was offset by our payable to dMobile for a certain software purchase and
a portion of the $1,000,000 prepayment dMobile paid towards the ground station equipment purchase price, leaving a balance owed
by Aircom to dMobile of $471,100. In March 2017, due to changes in ground station equipment technology, both parties mutually agreed
to terminate the contracts between them and dMobile agreed to accept 94,220 shares of our common stock in settlement of the $471,100
balance. For a more detailed discussion of this settlement agreement, see “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,
and Director Independence” below.

We will work with our hardware providers
to obtain the necessary STCs or VSTCs for individual aircraft types. We will also provide training and technical support to each
airline’s MRO services provider(s) for the installation of our equipment. Such support will also include technical, management,
and operational support, with 24/7 network monitoring of the performance of each aircraft’s equipment.

Our Content Solutions

Traditionally, airlines view in-flight
entertainment content as a budgeted expense for which they have to pay hefty royalties. With our business model and technologies,
we are able to transform in-flight entertainment into a source of revenue for our airline customers. We are teaming up with our
current and future prospective airline customers to provide free onboard Wi-Fi services to passengers, which allows us to maintain
data traffic control, specifically in terms of blocking or placing advertisements as needed and inserting targeted commercials.

Premium Content Sponsorship

Recently, merchants have begun to take
advantage of in-flight connectivity. In May of 2015, Amazon announced its plan to sponsor free video and music streaming for its
Prime Video subscribers onboard JetBlue’s planes. The Amazon and JetBlue partnership is a paradigm of a win-win affiliation
between an Internet powerhouse and a provider of in-flight connectivity. Amazon gained a platform through which it could display
its premium subscription services and expanded its distribution network, while JetBlue generated significant revenue simply by
making its in-flight connectivity available to Amazon.

The Amazon-JetBlue partnership is only
one of many examples whereby an Internet company can vastly increase its competitive edge by gaining access to in-flight connectivity.
We seek to exemplify this type of relationship through collaboration with major Internet companies, such as a search engine company.
We plan to promote the partner’s brand through its in-flight services by channeling all searches to the partner’s search
engine. By designing the user interface around the partnered company, we can present passengers with an on-screen environment populated
by its apps, logos, and colors, providing a powerful marketing tool for the company. We can also enhance recognition of our sponsors’
brand by creating a list of portals on the in-flight system’s home screen, which leads to each sponsor’s individual
page where passengers can resume their normal entertainment, social, and professional activities.

We are actively negotiating with Internet
content providers to establish premium sponsorships. We have entered into a memorandum of understanding with Yahoo! to provide
bandwidth sponsorship with branding potential.

Live TV

We are negotiating with television providers
along our airline partners’ flight routes to make live TV available through our IFEC system. Airlines can select live TV
channels that are appropriate for each flight route. An Electronic Program Guide channel listing will be available for easy viewing
and selection.

Several revenue sources will be available
for live TV broadcasting, including commercials before and during programs, and banners at the bottom of the screen. Banner advertisements
at the bottom of the screen can be interactive which will generate pay per click, or PPC, or cost per click, or CPC, revenue in
addition to the lower priced cost per thousand impressions, or CPM, revenue. In addition, we could receive sponsorship premiums
from select TV programs, such as pay-per-view and shopping channels.

5

Social Media and Instant Messaging

We have firewalls in place both on the
ground and in the air. These, in combination with our policy enforcement software, allow us to filter, classify, block, or forward
services in accordance to our service and quality policies. We can control the flow of traffic for each individual application,
enabling us to use a white list model through which social media and instant messaging partners can provide their users with onboard
access by paying an annual fee.

We are in active discussions with Line,
WeChat, WhatsApp, and other social media partners regarding an annual premium fee in exchange for user access to their applications
and services during air travel. The access to other networks may be limited to a single direction or blocked entirely. For example,
we could allow the users of a non-paying instant message service to receive, but not send, instant messages. When a user tries
to respond to a received message, the system would present a pop-up message encouraging the user to urge the service provider to
enter into a relationship with us.

Airlines can select movies, videos, and
other content for their passengers through our content management system. The management system will tailor content suggestions
according to the flight route and destination and automatically upload selected content to an onboard server while the aircraft
is on the ground. This creates a cache that allows in-flight viewing in areas with limited or no satellite bandwidth connectivity.
For premium content, we may maintain a live connection with the providers’ network for accounting and digital rights management
purposes.

Video/Content on Demand

Content that is available to passengers
for free will generate advertising-based revenue through commercials before and during the programming, as well as through banners
advertisements. Passengers can choose to pay for premium content, such as first-run movies where available. For programming of
all types, our partnered advertising agents can integrate appropriate and effective advertisements targeted to the viewer. Prior
to the start of any program, users will be required to view a commercial with a length determined by the duration of the selected
program. Passenger may not skip or close this commercial without closing out of the program. We can place similar advertisements
before games or radio programs and during online duty-free shopping.

Frequent flying passengers will be able
to purchase a premium package to allow access to unlimited movies, games, and other entertainment contents with no layered advertising.
These packages will include day, trip, monthly, and annual based membership.

Search Engine

In this information age, people often refer
to the Internet for information, yet few individuals are aware that every Internet search they perform generates revenue for the
search engine company. Search engine providers, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo, sell keywords, page ranking in search results,
advertisement placement, and other related services. The revenue generated by a search engine fluctuates in relation to its volume
of activity. We will manage search engines on a white list basis, which means that the in-flight connectivity system will only
permit traffic to and from approved search engines to go through. If a passenger performs a search on a search engine that is not
partnered with us, the search will be redirected to one that is.

We plan to enter into an agreement with
search engine partners to share the revenue generated from passengers’ searches. As discussed under “Premium Content
Sponsorship” above, we may grant exclusivity to a particular search engine provider that is a premium sponsor. Such exclusivity
may be specific to certain airlines or routes.

Internet Advertising Replacement

We have invested millions of dollars in
airborne satellite infrastructure in order to deliver Internet access to passengers. In the Internet traffic, more than 50% of
bandwidth is consumed by advertisements in the data stream. In order to streamline bandwidth usage, our ground system will detect
advertisements from a webpage and replaces them with advertisements from our advertisers or partners. We will work with Internet
advertisers to present advertisements that are relevant to passengers’ interests. This system enables our partners to place
their advertisements accordingly and generate revenue for both parties. These industry-leading advertisers offer destination-specific
commercials and banners, which can be placed in the in-flight entertainment system and in apps and portal on personal devices.
By utilizing these commercial agents to sell ad space on these systems, we plan to cover all marketable areas, expanding sales
opportunities and increasing revenue.

With online advertisement utilizing both
CPM and CPC models, we are able to capitalize on virtually all available ad space and work with any advertising partner.

Online/Streaming Gaming

We will make it possible to stream console-quality
games in the cabin. Through gaming content partnerships, we will be able to offer PlayStation, Xbox, and other console games. Passengers
will be able to play popular games from their personal device or in-flight entertainment system, invite friends to play over the
network, and save their gaming data for continued play on the ground, which require high speed network in order to play those interactive
action games. Our online gaming service will bring our passengers a gaming experience never seen before. We expect to generate
revenue from advertisements, including banners and commercials, and from fees for premium games or sales of access passes.

6

Telecommunications Text Messaging Services

Through strategic partnerships with telecommunication
providers, we will allow passengers to use 4G messaging services while in flight. Our in-flight system will detect whether the
passenger is using a partner carrier’s network and will deliver or block messages to and from a passenger’s mobile
phone accordingly. For those using a non-partner’s network, the system will urge the passenger to request that their service
provider join our network. These passengers can also purchase a premium package to enable the text message service.

Destination-Based Service

With flight route and passenger information,
our partners will be able to offer destination-specific merchandise and services, including hotel and rental car bookings, transportation
arrangements, restaurant reservations, local tours, and ticket purchases. Travel insurance may be offered on the flight. By signing
up with service partners in the region, we will share the transaction-based revenue by a fixed dollar amount or percentage of the
transaction.

In-flight Trading

We have found that in-flight connectivity
allows travelers to make better use of their travel time. With the uninterrupted broadband available onboard, passengers can conduct
business with professionalism and ease. One example of this benefit is that we plan to collaborate with trading partners to offer
financial trading services and charge a processing fee when a passenger conducts a trade in-flight.

Black Box Live

For reasons of flight safety, a flight
recorder, commonly known as a black box, is required on every aircraft over a certain size. The flight recorder records data with
respect to the various status of the flight and stores the data on a magnetic tape or solid-state disk with special coding. After
retrieving the relevant information from the device, an individual can decode the data and learn what the aircraft encountered
during the flight. This makes it possible to determine the potential causes of an accident. When the black box is needed, the aircraft
has likely suffered an accident. A massive impact or explosion accompanies most airplane crashes, thus requiring the flight recorder
to be shockproof and fire resistant. As the majority of aviation accidents happen over an ocean, the flight recorder must also
be waterproof and corrosion-resistant to avoid being damaged by salt water. Despite advancements in flight recorder design and
the continual improvement of the strength of its materials, records show that a large number of flight recorders were damaged and
unreadable following accidents, if not lost altogether. For this reason, effective, real-time storage of in-flight data is beneficial
for deducing the cause of aviation crashes and preventing them from happening again.

With this new product, Black Box Live,
we expect to provide a system of real-time flight information back-up which is aimed at advancing flight safety. Under strict security
measures, this new product will securely stream the flight data and crewmembers’ cockpit voice records to our cloud for airlines
and authorized individuals to access and monitor. Black Box Live is in the early stages of development and, at this time, we cannot
assure you when this product will reach market, if at all.

AirCinema

Our planned AirCinema solution is designed
to transfer passengers’ visual and audio experience. Traditional built-in in-flight entertainment systems, in particular
those in the economic cabin, are confined to very small screen and primitive audio sound. Our planned AirCinema utilizes pico projector
technology to bring supersized screen display onboard airplanes without incurring outrageous costs or adding significant weight.
AirCinema will aim to deliver a screen size of up to 20” in economy seats and even bigger screen in business or first-class
cabins. With such screen sizes, it will be possible for AirCinema to obtain IMAX certification. Moreover, AirCinema will be capable
of providing full HD 3D Cinema experience in-flight. In addition, AirCinema will incorporate a special designed head rest with
embedded speaker arrays that will deliver THX surround sound without headphones. We plan to qualify AirCinema for a theater license,
which would enable us to provide first-run theater only movie titles and sell movie tickets on pay-per-view basis. Our satellite-based
connectivity system could stream the movie title from ground to aircraft and simultaneously provide digital rights management,
which is a prerequisite of showing a theater-only movie title. AirCinema will transform airline coach seating into theater seating
and the passengers could enjoy movies with the same look and feel of sitting in a movie theater.

Aircom entered into a development agreement
with Priceplay.com, Inc., or PPUS, a California corporation whose chairman is Daniel Shih, our co-founder, a former material beneficial
owner of our common stock and the husband of our former director, Barbie Shih, for development of airplane passenger seats incorporating
our AirCinema technology which we were to sell to PPUS and the delivery by PPUS to us of two prototype three-seat rows of seats
for economy cabins. In March 2017, PPUS and Aircom mutually agreed to terminate the remainder of this contract due to changes in
related technology and PPUS’ exit from this segment of the IFEC business. We will resume the development of this product
upon the availability of certain new technology and additional funding. We cannot assure you at this time that we will be able
to complete development of this new product offering. In settlement of the agreement with PPUS, we agreed to convert PPUS’
remaining prepayments to us of $737,000 into a subscription for 147,400 shares of our common stock. For a more detailed discussion
of this settlement agreement, see “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence”
below.

7

Yacht Communications

We have begun to develop new equipment
and services to provide satellite communications to yachts, initially in the East Asia market. Our new yachts service will utilize
the same satellite communication infrastructure we have developed for IFEC. We are currently in the customer demonstration stage
with our yacht satellite communications equipment and services. We cannot be sure at this time that we will be successful developing
or marketing this yacht product offering.

Satellite Ground Stations and Data Centers

We plan to build a satellite ground station
and a data center in Asia region to support our operations in that region.

A ground station’s main purpose is
to establish telecommunication links with satellites. It houses satellite antennae and other communication equipment.
Satellite antennae must be located within the coverage of the satellites being used. Ground station satellite antennae are
substantial in size, generally between 20 to 30 feet (7 to 9 meters) in diameter. As we expand our operation, we expect to
have multiple dish antennae connecting to various satellites. Due to the strong electromagnetic radiation emitted by the
antennae, a ground station must be located in rural or industrial areas and it requires a substantial setback zone around the ground
station.

Since our IFEC business model will require
collecting and processing large amounts of data, it will be beneficial for us to have access to a high capacity data center for
the storage and processing of big data. Such a data center should be built within the same region of, and close to, the ground
station, because of synergies and technical advantages such as shorter network latency and cost savings in ground links between
the ground station and data center. We expect that building our own satellite ground stations and data centers will, in the long
run, create economic efficiencies and operational independence.

We are actively searching for appropriate
sites for our first ground station and data center in the Asia region.

Our Contracts with Airline Partners

In June 2016, we entered into a master
agreement with Hong Kong Airlines Limited, a Hong Kong based airline, or Hong Kong Airlines, to install IFEC systems on-board their
aircraft. Also party to this agreement is Klingon Aerospace Inc., formerly known as LUXE Electric Co., Ltd., a Taiwanese corporation,
or Klingon, our product development partner and value-added reseller in the region where Hong Kong Airlines operates. Daniel Shih,
our co-founder, was Chairman of Klingon from February 2015 to February 2016, and Peter Chiou, our former Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President, was Chief Executive Officer and President of Klingon from March 2015 through April 2016, prior to his joining
our company in February 2017.

The implementation of the Hong Kong Airlines
project is conditioned upon VSTC approval from the HKCAD. We and our equipment supplier have submitted the VSTC application to
HKCAD, but the application process is presently on hold due to the supplier’s failure to deliver a key component of the IFEC
system. Presently, we do not expect the supplier to be able to delivery such key component. As a result, we are actively seeking
alternative options to implement the Hong Kong Airline project, including developing necessary equipment or components thereof
with other strategic partners. Because we cannot be sure when we will be able to obtain the IFEC equipment for the VSTC approval,
we cannot be sure when we will begin to generate revenues from the agreement with Hong Kong Airlines, if at all.

Until such time as all approvals from the
HKCAD have been received, our agreement with Hong Kong Airlines only expresses the parties’ desires and understandings and
will not create any legal rights, liabilities or responsibilities whatsoever and will not be legally binding on us or Hong Kong
Airlines. There can be no assurance as to when we will receive the required HKCAD approvals.

Additionally, we had expected that our
services would be provided to Hong Kong Airlines through AsiaSat pursuant to the terms of our agreement with AsiaSat. Now that
our agreement with AsiaSat has been terminated, we will have to find a replacement satellite services provider for our future arrangement
with Hong Kong Airlines. We may not be able to find a replacement of AsiaSat on reasonable terms, if at all.

8

We plan to enter into business agreements
with additional airline partners that will allow our satellite equipment and/or entertainment services to be installed, and our
services provided, on their aircraft. Under these agreements, we expect that the airlines will commit to have our equipment installed
on some or all of the aircraft they operate, and we will commit to provide passenger connectivity and/or entertainment services
on such aircraft and to remit to the airlines a specified percentage of the revenue that we generate. We will have the exclusive
right to provide Internet connectivity services on these aircraft throughout the term of the agreement in contracts with airline
partners. Depending on the contract, installation and maintenance services may be performed by us and/or the airline. These agreements
will also vary as to who pays for installation and maintenance of the equipment.

MOUs and LOI with Our Business Partners

Yahoo MOU: On January 19,
2016, Aircom entered into a nonbinding memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the Yahoo MOU, with Yahoo! Hong Kong Limited,
or Yahoo, pursuant to which, the parties intend to collaboratively market and provide their products and services to commercial
airlines in Asia. Through its affiliates, Yahoo provides customers internet related services including software, content, communications,
media and commerce services. According to the Yahoo MOU, Yahoo intends to use our in-flight entertainment and connectivity system,
or IFEC, to provide in-flight services to its customers. By 2018, through co-marketing and co-branding with Yahoo, we expect to
install IFEC on at least 50 aircraft in Asia. In addition, the parties intend to collaborate on destination based marketing and
develop a revenue-share scheme on the advertising revenue arising from the in-flight services. We expect that Yahoo will be the
exclusive provider of pre-roll video ads on our IFEC in exchange for committed revenue from Yahoo. The parties further intend to
collaborate and develop the necessary interface to support interaction and/or integration between our backend and each of Yahoo’s
websites and Yahoo’s applications. All present and future intellectual property rights related to IFEC are expected to solely
belong to us or the third-party or third parties from whom we obtained the right to use. The Yahoo MOU has a term of two years
unless otherwise modified or terminated by the parties. This MOU expired on January 19, 2018 and we are working with Yahoo! Hong
Kong to extend this MOU.

LeTV MOU: On January 29,
2016, Aircom entered into a nonbinding memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the LeTV MOU, with LeTV Cloud Computing
Co., Ltd, or LeTV, pursuant to which, the parties intend to collaboratively market and provide their respective products and services
to commercial airlines in Asia. LeTV is a public company in China that provides internet related services including video streaming,
software and content to its customers. According to the LeTV MOU, LeTV intends to use our IFEC to provide in-flight services to
its customers. By 2018, through co-marketing and co-branding with LeTV, we expect to install IFEC on at least 50 aircraft in Asia.
The parties also intend that all present and future intellectual property rights related to IFEC will solely belong to us or the
third-party or third parties from whom we obtained the right to use. The LeTV MOU has a term of two years unless otherwise modified
or terminated by the parties. This MOU expired on January 29, 2018, and the Company is currently negotiating with LeTV to extend
this MOU.

India MOU: On June 16, 2016,
Aircom entered into a nonbinding memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the India MOU, with Nelco Limited, or NELCO,
and NELCO’s wholly owned subsidiary, Tatanet Services Limited, or TNSL, pursuant to which, the parties intend to collaboratively
market and provide their products and services to commercial airlines in India. NELCO and TNSL are both Indian companies that provide
satellite communications services in India and its surrounding regions. Under the terms of the India MOU, the parties intend to
jointly market our IFEC and provide in-flight services to commercial airlines in India. The parties expect to apply respectively
for regulatory approvals in India as may be required for the airworthiness certificate. In addition, the parties intend to collaborate
on technical and business assessment to incorporate our IFEC with NELCO’s and TNSL’s services and contents to the mutually
agreed customers. The India MOU has a term of two years unless otherwise modified or terminated by the parties.

Malta MOU: On October 28,
2017, Aircom entered into a nonbinding memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the Malta MOU, with PanAfriqiyah, a company
organized under the laws of Malta, pursuant to which the parties intend to collaboratively market and provide their products and
services to passengers of a Malta-based airline fleet. Under the terms of the Malta MOU, the parties intend to develop, install
and operate in-flight connectivity systems onboard the Malta-based airline fleet and provide related services to its passengers.

Onurair MOU: On March 1,
2018, Aircom entered into a nonbinding memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the Onurair MOU, with Onurair Tasimacilik
A.S., a company organized under the laws of Turkey, pursuant to which the parties intend to collaboratively market and provide
their products and services to passengers of the Turkey-based airline fleet. Under the terms of the Onurair MOU, the parties intend
to develop, install and operate in-flight connectivity systems onboard the Turkey-based airline fleet and provide related services
to its passengers.

Global Eagle LOI: On September
26, 2017, Aircom entered into a nonbinding letter of intent, which we refer to as the Global Eagle LOI, with Global Eagle Entertainment
Inc., or Global Eagle, for the development, installation and operation of certain IFEC services on selected aircraft of certain
of Global Eagle’s network partners. Global Eagle and its affiliates are in the business of developing and manufacturing IFEC
systems and solutions, including hardware, software, installation, networks services, content delivery and related services. According
to the Global Eagle LOI, the parties intend to develop, install and operate an IFEC system to provide onboard Wi-Fi services and
content delivery on aircraft of Global Eagle’s network partners. The parties plan to collaborate on technical and business
assessments to best combine Global Eagle’s onboard equipment and ground management systems, Global Eagle’s entertainment
portal and related billing and authentication services, and our IFEC system to provide IFEC services to such network partners.
We are expected to fund the capital expenditure for this project, including initial nonrecurring engineering, equipment and satellite
bandwidth costs while Global Eagle intends to fund the operational expenditures for this project including network and bandwidth
costs. In addition, we agreed that until December 31, 2017, we would not directly or indirectly enter into or continue discussions
with any party operating in the business of providing products and services similar to the in-flight entertainment and/or connectivity
products offered by Global Eagle, in each case for the benefit of certain of Global Eagle’s network partners. This exclusivity
restriction, which has now expired, did not apply to negotiations and discussions with respect to the provision of services or
products to any persons other than those certain Global Eagle network partners.

9

Airbus S.A.S. MOU: On March 7, 2018,
Aircom entered into a nonbinding memorandum of understanding, which we refer to as the Airbus MOU, with Airbus S.A.S., a company
organized under the laws of France, for the development by Airbus of a complete solution relating to the installation of Aircom’s
IFEC system on Airbus single aisle aircraft and the procurement by Airbus of the relevant regulatory certifications.

All of the above MOUs, and the Global Eagle
LOI are nonbinding and as a result, they only express the desires and understandings between the parties and do not create any
legally binding rights, obligations or contracts except for certain customary provisions such as exclusivity, costs and expenses,
confidentiality and governing law. Any binding obligation to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the MOUs and the Global
Eagle LOI would need to be included in a definitive agreement that is subject to negotiations of the parties, approvals by the
board of directors of respective parties and in certain instances, approvals from regulatory authorities. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to enter into such definitive agreements or receive the required governmental approvals. If for whatever reason
the transactions contemplated by the MOUs and the Global Eagle LOI do not proceed, our results of operations and financial condition
could be materially adversely affected.

Product Development, Manufacturing,
Installation and Maintenance

On March 9, 2015, we entered into a 10-year
purchase agreement with Klingon, pursuant to which we agreed to sell our in-flight connectivity systems to Klingon for joint development
and resale to Hong Kong based airlines under the brand name Aircom4U. In accordance with the terms of this agreement, Klingon agreed
to purchase from us an initial order of onboard equipment comprising an onboard system for a purchase price of $909,000, with payments
to be made in accordance with a specific milestones schedule. To date, we have received $762,000 from Klingon in milestone payments
towards the equipment purchase price.

Klingon may, at its option, purchase additional
onboard system packages in connection with the marketing of the Aircom4U business. In furtherance of this arrangement, Klingon
is a party to our agreement with Hong Kong Airlines. We expect Klingon to purchase additional onboard systems for resale to Hong
Kong Airlines once our VSTC is approved by the HKCAD, although we can give no assurance as to when this will take place, if at
all.

Because of the delay by our onboard system
equipment supplier for the approval of the VSTC from the HKCAD, we have not been able to deliver to Klingon a ready for sale, certified
onboard system equipment package. Instead, we have delivered to Klingon a development kit of the ordered equipment, which is the
same as the finished product but for the lack of HKCAD certification. Although there is no specified deadline in the agreement
with Klingon for delivering the certified onboard system, Klingon has the right to terminate its agreement upon 60 days’
prior notice, subject to a 60-day cure period, if we fail to timely deliver the certified product. If Klingon terminates its agreement,
we may be responsible for refunding to Klingon the milestone payments that we have received. We will have to suspend or modify
our agreement with Klingon if our current equipment supplier is not able to provide certifiable onboard system equipment package
for the VSTC certification purpose.

We will provide airline partners with the
equipment necessary for in-flight connectivity, which is to be installed by the MRO service provider selected by the airline. We
will also provide training and technical support to each airline’s MRO for the installation of our equipment. Such support
will also include technical, management, and operational support, with 24/7 network monitoring of the performance of each aircraft’s
equipment.

We will rely on third-party suppliers for
equipment components that we use to provide our services, including those discussed below.

We will purchase our ground station equipment
from Blue Topaz Consultants, Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation, or BTC, under an agreement that we have with BTC dated
December 15, 2015. Under the terms of this agreement, BTC will develop and provide to us four (4) sets of ground station hub equipment,
or the Hub Equipment, for our use and sale into our Asian markets. We and BTC will separately enter into service agreements for
the installation and maintenance of the Hub Equipment systems. We have agreed to pay BTC $6,205,216 for the first Hub Equipment
system and have already made milestone payments to BTC totaling $3,250,000. The purchase price was increased to $6,234,260 on November
30, 2016 due to the increase in cost of a software license. We will be required to pay BTC the balance of $2,984,260 owed on the
first Hub Equipment system following delivery and service commencement of this system.

On January 15, 2015, we entered into a
statement of work with dMobile for the development by dMobile of a next generation satellite-based data link system that can utilize
advanced protocols such as WiMAX 2.1. According to the terms of this agreement, deliveries of work product were delivered to us
over a scheduled period of time with the final delivery having been completed. The purchase price for this project was $4,950,000.
We paid dMobile a non-refundable prepayment of $1,000,000. We and dMobile agreed to offset each other’s accounts receivable
and accounts payable under this agreement and the agreement referred to under “—Our IFEC Solutions—Our Connectivity
Solutions” above. After reconciliation of both accounts, we owed dMobile $471,100 which we agreed to settle through the issuance
to dMobile of 94,220 shares of our common stock.

10

In January 2016, we entered into a purchase
order, which we refer to as the Purchase Order, pursuant to which PPTW agreed to purchase from Aircom a set of mobile satellite
communication equipment priced at $909,000. In March 2017, PPTW informed us that it desired to terminate its satellite communications
related business and return the equipment that it purchased from us for a full refund. In settlement of this agreement, we agreed
to accept a return of the equipment and to convert PPTW’s payment to us of $819,300 into a subscription for 163,860 shares
of our common stock. For a more detailed discussion of this settlement agreement, see Item 13. “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions, and Director Independence” below.

Our Technology

Dual-Band Hybrid Satellite System

We believe that mobile satellite broadband
service requires the bandwidth efficiency provided by Ka band satellite and spot beam based HTS. However, limited Asia-Pacific
coverage area of Ka HTS systems restrict the use of a pure Ka band system. Our design of dual Ka/Ku band satellite terminal allows
independent acquisition of Ka and Ku band satellites at different orbital positions thus maximizing the utilization of satellite
bandwidth.

Transcoding

The current mainstream video compression
format is H.264, also known as MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding. It is widely used in Blu-ray discs, online videos, web software, and
HDTV broadcasts terrestrially and over cable and satellite.

H.265, also known as High Efficiency Video
Coding, is a newly developed video compression standard designed to replace H.264. It is capable of delivering H.264 video quality
at half the bit rate. H.265 has several significant advantages over H.264, including better compression, higher image quality,
and lower bandwidth usage.

We incorporate hardware-based, real-time
technology that transcodes content from multiple streaming or broadcast input forms. We convert the content into H.265-encoded
Internet protocol, or IP, streams, which reduces the amount of bandwidth required while enhancing the quality of the content. By
deploying real-time transcoding technology in its ground and airborne systems, we enable live TV and video streaming in an IP format
that optimizes satellite bandwidth utilization and achieves cost-effective content delivery.

Satellite Link Acceleration

The most common transmission control protocols,
or TCPs, used in the Internet have been designed for terrestrial wired networks. TCPs do not perform well in long-delay satellite
environment and may cause bad user experiences in web surfing and Internet access.

Our satellite link acceleration technology
improves TCP/IP-based data transmission over a satellite system through compression, deduplication, caching, latency optimization,
packet aggregation, and cross-layer enhancement. This technology includes end-to-end software in airborne system and ground server
for cost effective application accelerator and optimization of live TV and video streaming. This combination of technologies makes
airborne Web access and contents access feel like fiber at home.

AirCinema

AirCinema incorporates projector-based
H.265 steaming technology onboard an aircraft. We have optimized this projector system technology for in-flight viewing and entertainment
purposes by utilizing auto focusing, zooming, and alignment, as well as dynamic brightness control. Passengers can use the AirCinema
directional audio system to enjoy onboard music and content without the need for a separate headset.

Our Intellectual Property

We rely on a combination of intellectual
property rights, including trade secrets, patents, copyrights, trademarks and domain names, as well as contractual restrictions
to protect intellectual property and proprietary technology owned or used by us.

We have patented a certain number of our
technologies in the United States, Europe, China and Taiwan. Our patents within and outside of the United States will expire at
dates ranging from 2030 to 2031. We do not believe our business is dependent to any material extent on any single patent or group
of patents that we own. We also have a number of patent applications pending both within and outside of the United States and we
will continue to seek patent protection in the United States and certain other countries to the extent we believe such protection
is appropriate and cost-effective.

We consider our brands to be important
to the success of our business and our competitive position. We rely on both trademark registrations and common law protection
for trademarks. Our registered trademarks in the United States and certain other countries include, among others, “AirCinema”,
“AirTelecom”, “AircomPac” although we have not yet obtained registrations for our most important marks
in all markets in which we currently do business or intend to do business in the future. Generally, the protection afforded for
trademarks is perpetual, if they are renewed on a timely basis, if registered, and continue to be used properly as trademarks.

11

We license or purchase from third parties’
technology, software and hardware that are critical to providing our products and services. Much of this technology, software and
hardware is customized for our use and would be difficult or time-consuming to obtain from alternative vendors.

We have developed certain ideas, processes,
and methods that contribute to our success and competitive position that we consider to be trade secrets. We protect our trade
secrets by keeping them confidential through the use of internal and external controls, including contractual protections with
employees, contractors, customers, vendors, and airline partners. Trade secrets can be protected for an indefinite period so long
as their secrecy is maintained.

Our Competition

Our key competitors include Gogo Inc.,
which has the largest installed base in the IFEC market mainly via air-to-ground technology and L-band connectivity services and
provides a passenger-paid system of connectivity solutions and wireless in-flight entertainment services, and Panasonic Avionics
Corp., which provides IFEC hardware and solutions via L-band and Ku-band technology. Other competitors include ViaSat, Global Eagle
Entertainment, Inc., OnAir and Thales/LiveTV, all of which provide different technologies and strategies to provide in-flight connectivity
and/or entertainment. Regardless of the delivery mechanisms used by us or our competitors, the IFEC industry as a whole faces,
and is expected to continue to face, capacity constraints and unique technology challenges, which are expected to increase due
to increased demand for in-flight Internet.

We believe that the following competitive
strengths enable us to compete effectively in and capitalize on the growing IFEC market.

●

Unique business model. We believe that our business model sets us apart from our competitors. We combine cutting-edge connectivity technology with a unique content-driven approach. Traditionally, providers of in-flight connectivity focus primarily on the profit margin derived from the sale of hardware to airlines and of bandwidth to passengers. Both airlines and passengers have to “pay to play,” which results in low participation and usage rates. We break away from this model and set a new trend with our business model, under which neither airlines nor passengers need to pay for products or services. Furthermore, our business plan provides our airline partners with an opportunity to participate in our revenue sharing model. Taken together, this novel approach creates incentive for the airlines to work with us while driving up passenger usage rates.

●

Dual-band satellite technology. Most in-flight connectivity systems currently rely on the Ku-band satellite signals for communication, though many players in the market are working to provide higher bandwidth and faster transmitting rates using the Ka-band. However, there are few Ka-enabled satellites, which limits the coverage area in the Asia-Pacific region. Our dual band system architecture brings our airline partners and their passengers the benefits of both Ka- and Ku-band satellite technology. The Ka-band increases data throughput, while the Ku-band offers reliable service outside of the Ka-band coverage area or when Ka-band is not available due to weather or other interference.

Our Growth Strategy

We will strive to be a leading provider
of IFEC solutions by pursuing the following growth strategies:

●

Increase number of connected aircraft. As of the date of this report, we have not provided our services on any commercial aircraft. However, we plan to rollout installation and provide our services in 2018. We plan to leverage our unique ability to cost-effectively equip each commercial aircraft type in an airline’s fleet to increase the number of equipped aircraft, targeting full-fleet availability of our services for our current and future airline partners. We continue to pursue this significant global growth opportunity by leveraging our broad and innovative technology platform and technical expertise. Further, we offer attractive business models to our airline partners, giving them the flexibility to determine the connectivity solution that meets the unique demands of their business.

●

Increase passenger use of connectivity. We believe that our business model, under which neither airlines nor passengers need to pay for products or services, will create an incentive for the airlines to work with us while driving passenger usage rates to levels management believes could reach 90% or more, considering the fact that many passengers now carry more than one smart device.

●

Expand satellite network. We will continue to expand our global satellite network coverage through the purchase of additional Ku-band and Ka-band capacity, and seek to install aircraft with our satellite solutions, while continuing to invest in research and development of satellite antenna and modem technologies. We are actively working with satellite providers in order to accommodate airlines’ global routes and growing fleets. We are monitoring the satellite industry for growth in coverage, with recent attention on China Satcom’s plan to launch high-capacity Ka-band and Ka HTS multispot-beam satellites over the Asia-Pacific region.

●

Expand satellite-based services to other markets. We anticipate broadening our satellite-based services to high-speed railways, maritime and cruise lines, 4G/5G backhauling, and converged triple-play services in remote communities, with the potential to expand internationally into new markets. Future business prospects will be evaluated on a case by case basis by weighing the projected revenue from advertising fees and e-commerce revenue shares against the operating and capital expenditures of satellite coverage, bandwidth and operations. Our existing business model could be applied to high-speed railways and cruise lines, both of which have a sufficient passenger base for the service to be viable. High-speed railways in China that sit under our Ka satellite coverage area are not served by 4G/LTE mobile networks, providing us with a unique opportunity to deliver our services. High-speed railways in other regions of Asia present similar opportunities. Remote communities in Asia lack a telecom infrastructure, partly due to geographical limitations such as the many islands of the Philippines or Indonesia. Satellite-based communications and mesh network technology make triple play services possible, delivering live TV broadcasting, videos, and telecom services to these regions.

12

Regulation

As a participant in the global airline
and global telecommunication industries we are subject to a variety of government regulatory obligations

Federal Aviation Administration

The FAA prescribes standards and certification
requirements for the manufacturing of aircraft and aircraft components, and certifies and rates repair stations to perform aircraft
maintenance, preventive maintenance and alterations, including the installation and maintenance of aircraft components. Each type
of aircraft operated in the United States under an FAA-issued standard airworthiness certificate must possess an FAA Type Certificate,
or TC, which constitutes approval of the design of the aircraft type based on applicable airworthiness standards. When a party
other than the holder of the Type Certificate develops a major modification to an aircraft already type-certificated, that party
must obtain an FAA-issued STC approving the design of the modified aircraft type. We will regularly obtain an STC for each aircraft
type operated by each airline partner on whose aircraft our equipment will be installed and separate STCs typically are required
for different configurations of the same aircraft type, such as when they are configured differently for different airlines.

After obtaining an STC, a manufacturer
desiring to manufacture components to be used in the modification covered by the STC must apply to the FAA for a Parts Manufacturing
Authority, or PMA, which permits the holder to manufacture and sell components manufactured in conformity with the PMA and its
approved design and data package. In general, each initial PMA is an approval of a manufacturing or modification facility’s
production quality control system. PMA supplements are obtained to authorize the manufacture of a particular part in accordance
with the requirements of the pertinent PMA, including its production quality control system. We routinely apply for and receive
such PMAs and supplements.

Our business depends on our continuing
access to, or use of, these FAA certifications, authorizations and other approvals, and our employment of, or access to, FAA-certified
individual engineering and other professionals.

In accordance with these certifications,
authorizations and other approvals, the FAA requires that we maintain, review and document our quality assurance processes. The
FAA may also visit our facilities at any time as part of our agreement for certification as a manufacturing facility and repair
station to ensure that our facilities, procedures, and quality control systems meet FAA approvals we hold. In addition, we are
responsible for informing the FAA of significant changes to our organization and operations, product failures or defects, and any
changes to our operational facilities or FAA-approved quality control systems. Other FAA requirements include training procedures
and drug and alcohol screening for safety-sensitive employees working at our facilities.

Foreign Aviation Regulation

According to international aviation convention,
the airworthiness of FAA-certified equipment installed on U.S.-registered aircraft is recognized by civil aviation authorities,
or CAAs, worldwide. As a result, we do not expect to require further airworthiness certification formalities in countries outside
of the United States for U.S.-registered aircraft that already have an STC issued by the FAA covering our equipment. For aircraft
registered with a CAA other than the United States, the installation of our equipment requires airworthiness certification from
an airworthiness certification body. Typically, the CAA of the country in which the aircraft is registered is responsible for ensuring
the airworthiness of any aircraft modifications under its authority.

The FAA holds bilateral agreements with
a number of certification authorities around the globe. Bilateral agreements facilitate the reciprocal airworthiness certification
of civil aeronautical products that are imported/exported between two signatory countries. A Bilateral Airworthiness Agreement,
or BAA, or Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement, or BASA, with Implementation Procedures for Airworthiness provides for airworthiness
technical cooperation between the FAA and its counterpart civil aviation authorities. Under a BAA or BASA, the CAA of the aircraft’s
country of registration generally validates STCs issued by the FAA and then issues a VSTC. For countries with which the FAA does
not have a BAA or BASA, we must apply for certification approval with the CAA of the country in which the aircraft is registered.
In order to obtain the necessary certification approval, we will be required to comply with the airworthiness regulations of the
country in which the aircraft is registered. Failure to address all foreign airworthiness and aviation regulatory requirements
at the commencement of each airline partner’s service in any country in which they register aircraft when there are no applicable
bilateral agreements may lead to significant additional costs related to certification and could impact the timing of our ability
to provide our service on our airline partners’ fleet.

Federal Communications Commission

Under the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Communications Act, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, licenses the spectrum that we use and regulates
the construction, operation, acquisition and sale of our wireless operations. The Communications Act and FCC rules also require
the FCC’s prior approval of the assignment or transfer of control of an FCC license, or the acquisition, directly or indirectly,
of more than 25% of the equity or voting control of our company by non-U.S. individuals or entities.

13

Our various services are regulated differently
by the FCC. Our business may provide some of its voice and data services by reselling the telecommunications services of satellite
operators. Because we may provide these services on a common carrier basis, we may subject to the provisions of Title II of the
Communications Act, which require, among other things, that the charges and practices of common carriers be just, reasonable and
non-discriminatory.

We provide broadband Internet access to
commercial airlines and passengers. We plan to offer this service in the Asia-Pacific region and continental United States through
our partner’s facilities, using satellite-based data delivery.

The FCC has classified mobile (and fixed)
broadband Internet access services as Title II telecommunications services pursuant to the FCC Open Internet Order of 2010, or
the Open Internet Order. The Open Internet Order also adopted broad new net neutrality rules. For example, broadband providers
may not block access to lawful content, applications, services or non-harmful devices. Broadband providers also may not impair
or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services or non-harmful devices. In addition, broadband
providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind, and they
may not prioritize the content and services of their affiliates. Other than for paid prioritization, the rules contain an exception
for “reasonable network management.” The Open Internet Order recognizes that whether a network management practice
is reasonable varies according to the broadband technology involved, and provides more flexibility to implement network management
practices in the context of our capacity-constrained satellite broadband networks.

In addition, most of our services are subject
to various rules that seek to ensure that the services are accessible by persons with disabilities, including requirements related
to the pass-through of closed captioning for certain IP-delivered video content.

Equipment Certification

We may not lease, sell, market or distribute
any radio transmission equipment used in the provision of our services unless such equipment is certified by the FCC as compliant
with the FCC’s technical rules. All certifications required for equipment currently used in the provision of our services
have been obtained by our equipment vendors and/or partners.

Privacy and Data Security-Related
Regulations

As noted above, the Open Internet Order
reclassified mobile (and fixed) broadband Internet access services as Title II telecommunications services. Certain statutory provisions
of Title II now apply to broadband Internet access services, including provisions that impose consumer privacy protections such
as the FCC’s Consumer Proprietary Network Information, or CPNI, requirements.

Our services are also subject to CPNI rules
that require carriers to comply with a range of marketing and privacy safeguards. These obligations focus on carriers’ access,
use, storage and disclosure of CPNI. We believe we are in compliance with these rules and obligations, and we certify annually,
as required, that we have established operating procedures adequate to ensure our compliance.

We are also subject to other federal and
state consumer privacy and data security requirements. For example, Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, Act prohibits
“unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.” Although the FTC’s authority to regulate the
non-common carrier services offered by communications common carriers has not been clearly delineated, FTC officials have publicly
stated that they view the FTC as having jurisdiction over Internet service providers’ non-common carrier services. Some of
our services are subject to the FTC’s jurisdiction. The FTC has brought enforcement actions under the FTC Act against companies
that, inter alia: (1) collect, use, share, or retain personal information in a way that is inconsistent with the representations,
commitments, and promises that they make in their privacy policies and other public statements; (2) have privacy policies that
do not adequately inform consumers about the company’s actual practices; and (3) fail to reasonably protect the security,
privacy and confidentiality of nonpublic consumer information.

We plan to collect personally identifiable
information, such as name, address, e-mail address and credit card information, directly from our users when they register to use
our service. We also may obtain information about our users from third parties. We use the information that we collect to, for
example, consummate their purchase transaction, to customize and personalize advertising and content for our users and to enhance
the entertainment options when using our service. Our collection and use of such information is intended to comply with our privacy
policy, which is posted on our website, applicable law, our contractual obligations with third parties and industry standards,
such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. We are also subject to state “mini-FTC Acts,” which also
prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices, along with data security breach notification laws requiring entities holding certain
personal data to provide notices in the event of a breach of the security of that data. Congress has also been considering similar
federal legislation relating to data breaches. A few states have also imposed specific data security obligations. These state mini-FTC
Acts, data security breach notification laws, and data security obligations may not extend to all of our services and their applicability
may be limited by various factors, such as whether an affected party is a resident of a particular state.

While we intend to implement reasonable
administrative, physical and electronic security measures to protect against the loss, misuse and alteration of personally identifiable
information, cyber-attacks on companies have increased in frequency and potential impact in recent years and may be successful
despite reasonable precautions and result in substantial potential liabilities.

14

Truth in Billing and Consumer Protection

The FCC’s Truth in Billing rules
generally require full and fair disclosure of all charges on customer bills for telecommunications services, except for broadband
Internet access services. Thus, these rules apply to our satellite-based services. This disclosure must include brief, clear and
non-misleading plain language descriptions of the services provided. States also have the right to regulate wireless carriers’
billing; however, we are not currently aware of any states that impose billing requirements on our services.

CALEA

The FCC has determined that facilities-based
broadband Internet access providers are subject to the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act of 1994, or CALEA, which
requires covered service providers to build certain law enforcement surveillance assistance capabilities into their communications
networks and to maintain CALEA-related system security policies and procedures.

Foreign Government Approvals

In connection with our satellite service,
we have implemented a process for obtaining any required authority needed to provide our service over the airspace of foreign countries,
or verifying that no additional authorization is needed. Each country over which our equipped aircraft flies has the right to limit,
regulate (e.g., through a licensing regime) or prohibit the offering of our service. We may not be able to obtain the necessary
authority for every country over which a partner airline flies. For some countries, we have not been and do not expect to be able
to obtain a definitive answer regarding their potential regulation of our service, and we may incur some regulatory risk by operating
over the airspace of these countries. Failure to comply with foreign regulatory requirements could result in penalties being imposed
on us and/or on our airline partners or allow our airline partners affected by such requirements to terminate their contract with
us prior to expiration. Moreover, even countries that have previously provided clearance for our service have the right to change
their regulations at any time.

Employees

As of April 27, 2018, we had a total of
19 employees, 15 of whom are full-time employees. The following table sets forth the number of our full-time employees by function.

Function

Number of Employees

Operations

4

Sales and Marketing

4

Research and Development

8

General and Administrative

3

Total

19

Emerging Growth Company Status

We qualify as an “emerging growth
company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or JOBS Act. As a result, we are permitted to, and intend
to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements. For so long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required
to:

●

have an auditor report on our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

●

comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis);

●

submit certain executive compensation matters to shareholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency;” and

●

disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the chief executive officer’s compensation to median employee compensation.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act
also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B)
of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay
the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected
to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable
to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

We will remain an “emerging growth
company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual
gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2
under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million
as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which we have issued more
than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

15

ITEM
1A.

RISK
FACTORS.

Investment in our common stock involves
a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider each of the following risks, together with all other information set forth
in this report, including the financial statements and the related notes, before making a decision to buy our common stock. If
any of the following risks actually occurs, our business could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could
decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our company is in the development
stage and has a limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and predict our future
performance.

Our company and our core business are in
the development stage and faces all of the risks and uncertainties associated with a new and unproven business. We plan to launch
our services in Asia in 2018, initially in China or Southeast Asia. The limited operating history of our business may make it difficult
to accurately evaluate the business and predict its future performance. Any assessments of our current business and predictions
that we or you make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating
history. We have encountered and will continue to encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies
in rapidly changing industries, and the size and nature of our market opportunity will change as we scale our business and increase
deployment of our service. If we do not address any of the foregoing risks successfully, our business will be harmed.

Excluding non-recurring revenues
in 2015 from affiliates, we have incurred operating losses in every quarter since we launched our business and may continue to
incur quarterly operating losses, which could negatively affect the value of our company.

Excluding non-recurring revenues we earned
from affiliates in 2015, we have incurred operating losses since our inception in 2014, and we may not be able to generate sufficient
revenue in the future to generate operating income. We also expect our costs to increase materially in future periods, which could
negatively affect our future operating results. We expect to continue to expend substantial financial and other resources on the
continued launch and future expansion of our business. The amount and timing of these costs are subject to numerous variables and
such initiatives may require additional funding. In addition, we may incur significant costs in connection with our pursuit of
next generation air to ground technology or other new technologies. With respect to our expansion, such variables may include costs
related to sales and marketing activities and administrative support functions, equipment subsidies to airlines and additional
legal and regulatory expenses associated with operating in the international commercial aviation market. In addition, we expect
to incur additional general and administrative expenses, including legal and accounting expenses, related to being a public company.
These investments may not result in revenue or growth in our business. If we fail to grow our overall business and generate revenue,
our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

There is substantial uncertainty
that we will continue operations as a going concern in which case you could lose your entire investment.

Our future existence remains uncertain.
We have generated no recurring revenues to date, our only non-recurring revenues were from sales to our affiliates in 2015 and
we have suffered losses from our operations after excluding those non-recurring revenues. We also have outstanding accrued liabilities.
Although we expect to raise capital from the sale of equity or debt securities, there is no assurance that we will be able to do
so. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as a going concern for the next twelve months unless we obtain
additional capital to pay our bills and debts and execute our plan of operations.

We expect to rely on a few key customers
for all of our initial revenue.

Our initial business will be substantially
dependent on our relationship with a few key airline customers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our
relationship with these airlines. If we are unable to maintain and renew our relationship with these airlines, or if our arrangement
is modified so that the economic terms become less favorable to us, then our business would be materially adversely affected.

Our agreement with Hong Kong Airlines
will have no legal effect until we receive approval of our VSTC by the HKCAD.

Until such time as we have received all
required approvals from the HKCAD, the agreement with Hong Kong Airlines only expresses the desires and understandings between
us and Hong Kong Airlines and will not create any legal rights, liabilities or responsibilities whatsoever and will not be legally
binding on us or Hong Kong Airlines. There can be no assurance as to when we will receive the required HKCAD approvals or if we
will receive such approvals at all. If we do not receive the HKCAD approval of our VSTC, our agreement with Hong Kong airlines
will have no economic impact. Such an outcome would have a substantial adverse effect on our revenue prospect.

16

If the transactions contemplated
by several MOUs and the Global Eagle LOI do not proceed, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.

On January 19, 2016, January 29, 2016,
June 16, 2016, September 26, 2017, October 28, 2017 and March 7, 2018, we entered into the Yahoo MOU, the LeTV MOU, the India MOU,
the Malta MOU, the Global Eagle LOI, and the Airbus MOU, respectively. These MOUs and the Global Eagle LOI are nonbinding and as
a result, they only express the desires and understandings between the parties and do not create any legally binding rights, obligations
or contracts except for certain customary provisions such as exclusivity, costs and expenses, confidentiality and governing law.
For more information related to these MOUs, please refer to the section “MOUs and LOI with Our Business Partners.”
Any binding obligation to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the MOUs and the Global Eagle LOI would need to be included
in a definitive agreement that is subject to negotiations of the parties, approvals by the board of directors of respective parties
and in certain instances, approvals from regulatory authorities. The Yahoo MOU and LeTV MOU expired in January 2018 and we are
in the process of negotiating to extend those two MOUs. There can be no assurance that we will be able to extend the expired MOUs
or enter into such definitive agreements or receive the required governmental approvals. If for whatever reason the transactions
contemplated by the MOUs and the Global Eagle LOI do not proceed, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.

One of our suppliers has failed to
deliver a key component of our IFEC system and we have terminated our satellite services agreement with another. We cannot be sure
that we will be able to find alternative source for this component or for the required satellite services and, as a result, we
may not be able to implement our business plan.

The implementation of the Hong Kong Airlines
project is conditioned upon VSTC approval from the HKCAD. We and our equipment supplier have submitted the VSTC application to
HKCAD but the application process is presently on hold due to the supplier’s failure to deliver a key component of the IFEC
system. We do not expect this supplier to be able to delivery this key component and we are actively seeking alternative options
to implement the Hong Kong Airline project, including developing necessary equipment or components thereof with other strategic
partners. Because we cannot be sure when and if we will be able to obtain the IFEC component for the VSTC approval, we cannot be
sure when we will receive approval for the Hong Kong Airlines project, if at all. If we are not able to source this necessary IFEC
component, our current agreement with Hong Kong Airlines will not become executable and we will not be able to implement our business
plan as currently envisioned.

Additionally, our satellite services agreement
with AsiaSat was recently terminated. If we are not able to find a replacement satellite services provider, we will not be able
to deliver our service offerings to Hong Kong Airlines even once we receive the VSTC approval from HKCAD. Such a failure would
have a negative impact on our business prospects.

If we cannot timely deliver our first
order of onboard equipment to Klingon Aerospace Inc., our reseller and development partner, we may lose our agreement with Klingon.

Because of the delay in our receiving approval
of the VSTC from the HKCAD, we have not been able to deliver to Klingon a ready for sale, certified onboard system equipment package.
Klingon has the right to terminate our agreement with them upon 60 days’ prior notice, subject to a 60-day cure period, if
we fail to timely deliver the certified product. If Klingon terminates its agreement with us, we may be responsible for refunding
to Klingon the milestone payments that we have received.

We may not be able to grow our business
with our current potential airline partner or successfully negotiate agreements with airlines to which we do not currently provide
our service.

Currently, our only potential airline partner
is Hong Kong Airlines, although we have not yet begun to sell our products and services to Hong Kong Airlines under our agreement
with them. We are currently in negotiations or discussions with certain other airline partners to provide our IFEC services on
additional aircraft in their fleets. We have no assurance that these efforts will be successful. Negotiations with prospective
airline partners require substantial time, effort and resources. The time required to reach a final agreement with an airline is
unpredictable and may lead to variances in our operating results from quarter to quarter. We may ultimately fail in our negotiations
and any such failure could harm our results of operations due to, among other things, a diversion of our focus and resources, actual
costs and opportunity costs of pursuing these opportunities. In addition, the terms of any future agreements could be materially
different and less favorable to us than the terms included in our existing agreement with Hong Kong Airlines. To the extent that
any negotiations with current or future potential airline partners are unsuccessful, or any new agreements contain terms that are
less favorable to us, our growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

We will likely need additional financing
to execute our business plan or new initiatives, which we may not be able to secure on acceptable terms, or at all.

We will require additional financing in
the near and long term to fully execute our business plan. Our success may depend on our ability to raise such additional financing
on reasonable terms and on a timely basis. Conditions in the economy and the financial markets may make it more difficult for us
to obtain necessary additional capital or financing on acceptable terms, or at all. If we cannot secure sufficient additional financing,
we may be forced to forego strategic opportunities or delay, scale back or eliminate additional service deployment, operations
and investments or employ internal cost savings measures.

17

We are dependent on airline partners
to be able to access our customers. We expect that future payments by these customers for our services to be provided to them will
account for most, if not all, of our initial revenues.

Under our existing contract with Hong Kong
Airlines, once our VSTC is approved by the HKCAD, we will provide our equipment for installation on, and provide our services to
passengers on, a portion of the aircraft operated by this airline. We expect to enter into similar contracts with other airlines
in the future but there is no assurance that we will be successful in signing up additional airlines partners. We expect that revenue
from passengers using our service while flying on aircraft operated by our airline partners will account for the majority of our
projected initial revenue once we begin our services. As of the date of this report, we do not yet have any revenue from equipment
sales and installation. Our growth will be dependent on our ability to have our equipment installed on the aircraft of airline
partners and increased use of our service on installed aircraft. Any delays in installations under these contracts may negatively
affect our ability to grow our user base and revenue.

A failure to maintain airline satisfaction
with our equipment or our service could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and results of operations.

Our relationships with our current and
future potential airline partners are critical to the growth and ongoing success of our business. If airline partners are not satisfied
with our equipment or our service for any reason, including passenger dissatisfaction with the service as a result of capacity
constraints, they may reduce efforts to co-market our service to their passengers, which could result in lower passenger usage
and reduced revenue, which could in turn give airline partners the right to terminate their contracts with us. In addition, airline
dissatisfaction with us for any reason, including delays in obtaining certification for or installing our equipment, could negatively
affect our ability to expand our service to additional airline partners or aircraft or lead to claims for damages, which may be
material, or termination rights under our existing or potential contracts with airline partners.

We are experiencing network capacity
constraints in our operation region and expect capacity demands to increase, and we may in the future experience capacity constraints
internationally. If we are unable to successfully implement planned or future technology enhancements to increase our network capacity,
or our airline partners do not agree to such enhancements, our ability to maintain sufficient network capacity and our business
could be materially and adversely affected.

All providers of wireless connectivity
services, including all providers of in-flight connectivity services, face certain limits on their ability to provide connectivity
service, including escalating capacity constraints due to expanding consumption of wireless services and the increasing prevalence
of higher bandwidth uses such as file downloads and streaming media content. The success of our business depends on our ability
to provide adequate bandwidth to meet customer demands while in-flight.

Competition from a number of companies,
as well as other market forces, could result in price reduction, reduced revenue and loss of market share and could harm our results
of operations.

We face strong competition from satellite-based
providers of broadband services that include in-flight internet and live television services. Competition from such providers has
had in the past and could have in the future an adverse effect on our ability to maintain or gain market share. Most of our competitors
are larger, more diversified corporations and have greater financial, marketing, production, and research and development resources.
As a result, they may be better able to withstand the effects of periodic economic downturns or may offer a broader product line
to customers. In addition, to the extent that competing in-flight connectivity services offered by commercial airlines that are
not our airline partners are available on more aircraft or offer improved quality or reliability as compared to our service, our
business and results of operations could be adversely affected. Competition could increase our sales and marketing expenses and
related customer acquisition costs. We may not have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing and support capabilities
to continue to compete successfully. A failure to effectively respond to established and new competitors could have a material
adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

We may be unsuccessful in generating
revenue from live television and other in-flight entertainment services.

We are currently developing a host of service
offerings to deliver to our future commercial airline customers. We plan to offer live television and other service to our customers
and no assurance can be given that we will ultimately be able to launch any channels or provide any service. Additionally, we plan
to generate a revenue stream from our video on demand and other in-flight entertainment services. If we are unable to generate
revenue from live television or if other entertainment services do not ultimately develop, our growth and financial prospects would
be materially adversely impacted.

We are working to acquire a sufficient
number of on-demand movies and television shows and a variety of other content on our system. The future growth prospects for our
business depend, in part, on revenue from advertising fees and e-commerce revenue share arrangements on passenger purchases of
goods and services, including video and media services. Our ability to generate revenue from these service offerings depends on:

●

growth of commercial airline customer base;

●

the attractiveness of our customer base to media partners;

●

rolling out live television and media on demand on more aircraft and with additional airline customers and increasing passenger adoption both in the U.S. and abroad;

18

●

establishing and maintaining beneficial contractual relationships with media partners whose content, products and services are attractive to airline passengers; and

●

our ability to customize and improve our service offerings in response to trends and customer interests.

If we are unsuccessful in generating revenue
from our service offerings, that failure could have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects.

We face limitations on our ability
to grow our operations which could harm our operating results and financial condition.

We have not yet begun selling our products
or services to our future customers. Our addressable market and our ability to expand in our operating region is inherently
limited by various factors, including limitations on the number of commercial airlines with which we could partner, the number
of planes in which our equipment can be installed, the passenger capacity within each plane and the ability of our network infrastructure
or bandwidth to accommodate increasing capacity demands. Future expansion is also limited by our ability to develop new technologies
on a timely and cost-effective basis, as well as our ability to mitigate network capacity constraints through, among other things,
the expansion of our satellite coverage area. Our future growth may slow, or once we begin selling products and services to our
customers, we may stop growing altogether, to the extent that we have exhausted all potential airline partners and as we approach
installation on full fleets and maximum penetration rates on all flights. In order to grow our future revenue, we will have to
rely on customer and airline partner adoption of currently available and new or developing services and additional offerings. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain a market presence or establish new markets and, if we fail to do so, our business
and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We may be unsuccessful in expanding
our operations internationally.

Our business will initially be international
business. Our ability to grow our international business involves various risks, including the need to invest significant resources
in unfamiliar markets and the possibility that we may not realize a return on our investments in the near future or at all. In
addition, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant expenses before we generate any material revenue in these
new markets. Under our agreements with providers of satellite capacity, we are obligated to purchase bandwidth for specified periods
in advance. If we are unable to generate sufficient passenger demand or airline partners to which we provide satellite service
to their aircraft terminate their agreements with us for any reason during these periods, we may be forced to incur satellite costs
in excess of connectivity revenue generated through such satellites.

Any future international operations may
fail to succeed due to risks inherent in foreign operations, including:

restrictions on the ability of U.S. companies to do business in foreign countries, including restrictions on foreign ownership of telecommunications providers imposed by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control, which we refer to as OFAC;

●

inability to find content or service providers to partner with on commercially reasonable terms, or at all;

●

compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the (U.K.) Bribery Act 2010 and other similar corruption laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate and related risks;

●

difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;

●

currency fluctuations; and

●

potential adverse tax consequences.

As a result of these obstacles, we may
find it difficult or prohibitively expensive to grow our business internationally or we may be unsuccessful in our attempt to do
so, which could harm our future operating results and financial condition.

We may not be successful in our efforts
to develop and monetize new products and services that are currently in development, including our operations-oriented communications
services.

In order to continue to meet the evolving
needs of our future airline partners and customers, we must continue to develop new products and services that are responsive to
those needs. Our ability to realize the benefits of enabling airlines, other aircraft operators and to use these applications,
including monetizing our services at a profitable price point, depends, in part, on the adoption and utilization of such applications
by airlines, other aircraft operators and other companies in the aviation industry such as aircraft equipment suppliers, and we
cannot be certain that airlines, other aircraft operators and others in the aviation industry will adopt such offerings in the
near term or at all. We also expect to continue to rely on third parties to develop and offer the operational applications to be
used to gather and process data transmitted on our network between the aircraft and the ground, and we cannot be certain that such
applications will be compatible with our network or onboard equipment or otherwise meet the needs of airlines or other aircraft
operators. If we are not successful in our efforts to develop and monetize new products and services, including our operations-oriented
communications services, our future business prospects, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely
affected.

19

A future act or threat of terrorism
or other events could result in a prohibition on the use of Wi-Fi enabled devices on aircraft.

A future act of terrorism, the threat of
such acts or other airline accidents could have an adverse effect on the airline industry. In the event of a terrorist attack,
terrorist threats or unrelated airline accidents, the industry would likely experience significantly reduced passenger demand.
The U.S. federal government or foreign governments could respond to such events by prohibiting the use of Wi-Fi enabled devices
on aircraft, which would eliminate demand for our equipment and service. In addition, any association or perceived association
between our equipment or service and accidents involving aircraft on which our equipment or service operates would likely have
an adverse effect on demand for our equipment and service. Reduced demand for our products and services would adversely affect
our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

If our efforts to retain and attract
customers are not successful, our revenue will be adversely affected.

We expect to generate substantially all
of our revenue from sales of services, some of which will be on a subscription basis. We must be able to retain subscribers and
attract new and repeat customers. If we are unable to effectively retain subscribers and attract new and repeat customers, our
business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Unreliable service levels, lack of sufficient
capacity, uncompetitive pricing, lack of availability, security risk and lack of related features of our equipment and services
are some of the factors that may adversely impact our ability to retain customers and partners and attract new and repeat customers.
If our customers are able to satisfy their in-flight entertainment needs through activities other than broadband internet access,
at no or lower cost, they may not perceive value in our products and services. If our efforts to satisfy and retain customers and
subscribers are not successful, we may not be able to attract new customers through word-of-mouth referrals. Any of these factors
could cause our customer growth rate to fall, which would adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The demand for in-flight broadband
internet access service may decrease or develop more slowly than we expect. We cannot predict with certainty the development of
the U.S. or international in-flight broadband internet access market or the market acceptance for our products and services.

Our future success depends upon growing
demand for in-flight broadband internet access services, which is inherently uncertain. We have invested significant resources
towards the roll-out of new service offerings, which represent a substantial part of our growth strategy. We face the risk that
the U.S. and international markets for in-flight broadband internet access services may decrease or develop more slowly or differently
than we currently expect, or that our services, including our new offerings, may not achieve widespread market acceptance. We may
be unable to market and sell our services successfully and cost-effectively to a sufficiently large number of customers.

Our business depends on the continued proliferation
of Wi-Fi as a standard feature in mobile devices. The growth in demand for in-flight broadband internet access services also depends
in part on the continued and increased use of laptops, smartphones, tablet computers, and other Wi-Fi enabled devices and the rate
of evolution of data-intensive applications on the mobile internet. If Wi-Fi ceases to be a standard feature in mobile devices,
if the rate of integration of Wi-Fi on mobile devices decreases or is slower than expected, or if the use of Wi-Fi enabled devices
or development of related applications decreases or grows more slowly than anticipated, the market for our services may be substantially
diminished.

Increased costs and other demands
associated with our growth could impact our ability to achieve profitability over the long term and could strain our personnel,
technology and infrastructure resources.

We expect our costs to increase in future
periods, which could negatively affect our future operating results. We expect to experience growth in our headcount and operations,
which will place significant demands on our management, administrative, technological, operational and financial infrastructure.
Anticipated future growth will require the outlay of significant operating and capital expenditures and will continue to place
strains on our personnel, technology and infrastructure. Our success will depend in part upon our ability to contain costs with
respect to growth opportunities. To successfully manage the expected growth of our operations, on a timely and cost-effective basis
we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial, technological and management controls and our reporting systems
and procedures. In addition, as we continue to grow, we must effectively integrate, develop and motivate a large number of new
employees, and we must maintain the beneficial aspects of our corporate culture. If we fail to successfully manage our growth,
it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse economic conditions may have
a material adverse effect on our business.

Macro-economic challenges are capable of
creating volatile and unpredictable environments for doing business. We cannot predict the nature, extent, timing or likelihood
of any economic slowdown or the strength or sustainability of any economic recovery, worldwide, in the United States or in the
airline industry. For many travelers, air travel and spending on in-flight internet access are discretionary purchases that they
can eliminate in difficult economic times. Additionally, a weaker business environment may lead to a decrease in overall business
travel, which is an important contributor to our service revenue. These conditions may make it more difficult or less likely for
customers to purchase our equipment and services. If economic conditions in the United States or globally deteriorate further or
do not show improvement, we may experience material adverse effects to our business, cash flow and results of operations.

20

Our operating results may fluctuate
unpredictably and may cause us to fail to meet the expectations of investors, adversely affecting our stock price.

We operate in a highly dynamic industry
and our future quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly. Our future revenue and operating results may vary from
quarter to quarter due to many factors, many of which are not within our control. As a result, comparing our operating results
on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. Further, it is difficult to accurately forecast our revenue, margin and operating
results, and if we fail to match our expected results or the results expected by financial analysts or investors, the future trading
price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

In addition, due to generally lower demand
for business travel during the summer months and holiday periods, and leisure and other travel at other times during the year,
our quarterly results may not be indicative of results for the full year. Due to these and other factors, quarter-to-quarter comparisons
of our historical operating results should not be relied upon as accurate indicators of our future performance.

If our marketing and advertising
efforts fail to generate revenue on a cost-effective basis, or if we are unable to manage our marketing and advertising expenses,
it could harm our results of operations and growth.

Our future growth and profitability, as
well as the maintenance and enhancement of our brands, will depend in large part on the effectiveness and efficiency of our future
marketing and advertising expenditures. We plan to use a diverse mix of television, print, trade show and online marketing and
advertising programs to promote our business. Significant increases in the pricing of one or more of our marketing and advertising
channels could increase our expenses or cause us to choose less expensive, but potentially less effective, marketing and advertising
channels. In addition, to the extent we implement new marketing and advertising strategies, we may in the future have significantly
higher expenses. We may in the future incur, marketing and advertising expenses significantly in advance of the time we anticipate
recognizing revenue associated with such expenses, and our marketing and advertising expenditures may not result in increased revenue
or generate sufficient levels of brand awareness. If we are unable to maintain our marketing and advertising channels on cost-effective
terms, our marketing and advertising expenses could increase substantially, our customer levels could be affected adversely, and
our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.

Regulation by United States and foreign
government agencies, including the FAA and the FCC, may increase our costs of providing service or require us to change our services.

We are subject to various regulations,
including those regulations promulgated by various federal, state and local regulatory agencies and legislative bodies and comparable
agencies outside the United States where we may do business. The two U.S. government agencies that have primary regulatory authority
over our operations are the FAA and the FCC.

The commercial and private aviation industries,
including civil aviation manufacturing and repair industries, are highly regulated in the United States by the FAA. FAA certification
is required for all equipment we install on commercial aircraft and type certificated business aircraft, and certain of our operating
activities require that we obtain FAA certification as a parts manufacturer. As discussed in more detail in “Item 1. Business—Regulation—Federal
Aviation Administration,” FAA approvals required to operate our business include STCs and PMAs. Obtaining STCs and PMAs is
an expensive and time-consuming process that requires significant focus and resources. Any inability to obtain, delay in obtaining,
or change in, needed FAA certifications, authorizations, or approvals, could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our
installation commitments, manufacture and sell parts for installation on aircraft, or expand our business and could, therefore,
materially adversely affect our growth prospects, business and operating results. The FAA closely regulates many of our operations.
If we fail to comply with the FAA’s many regulations and standards that apply to our activities, we could lose the FAA certifications,
authorizations, or other approvals on which our manufacturing, installation, maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration
capabilities are based. In addition, from time to time, the FAA or comparable foreign agencies adopt new regulations or amend existing
regulations. The FAA could also change its policies regarding the delegation of inspection and certification responsibilities to
private companies, which could adversely affect our business. To the extent that any such new regulations or amendments to existing
regulations or policies apply to our activities, those new regulations or amendments to existing regulations generally increase
our costs of compliance.

As a broadband Internet provider, we must
comply with the CALEA, which requires communications carriers to ensure that their equipment, facilities and services can accommodate
certain technical capabilities in executing authorized wiretapping and other electronic surveillance. Currently, our CALEA solution
is being deployed in our network. However, we could be subject to an enforcement action by the FCC or law enforcement agencies
for any delays related to meeting, or if we fail to comply with, any current or future CALEA, or similarly mandated law enforcement
related, obligations. Such enforcement actions could subject us to fines, cease and desist orders, or other penalties, all of which
could adversely affect our business. Further, to the extent the FCC adopts additional capability requirements applicable to broadband
Internet providers, its decision may increase the costs we incur to comply with such regulations.

In addition to these U.S. agencies, we
are also subject to regulation by foreign government agencies that choose to assert jurisdiction over us as a result of the service
we provide on aircraft that fly international routes. Adverse decisions or regulations of these U.S. and foreign regulatory bodies
could negatively impact our operations and costs of doing business and could delay the roll-out of our services and have other
adverse consequences for us. Our ability to obtain certain regulatory approvals to offer our services internationally may also
be the responsibility of a third- party, and, therefore, may be out of our control. We are unable to predict the scope, pace or
financial impact of regulations and other policy changes that could be adopted by the various governmental entities that oversee
portions of our business.

21

If government regulation of the Internet,
including e-commerce or online video distribution changes, we may need to change the way we conduct our business to a manner that
incurs greater operating expenses, which could harm our results of operations.

The current legal environment for Internet
communications, products and services is uncertain and subject to statutory, regulatory or interpretive change. We cannot be certain
that we, our vendors and media partners or our customers are currently in compliance with applicable regulatory or other legal
requirements in the countries in which our service is used. Our failure, or the failure of our vendors and media partners, customers
and others with whom we transact business to comply with existing or future legal or regulatory requirements could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Regulators may disagree with our interpretations of existing
laws or regulations or the applicability of existing laws or regulations to our business, and existing laws, regulations and interpretations
may change in unexpected ways.

For example, our mobile wireless broadband
Internet access services were previously classified as information services, and not as telecommunications services. Therefore,
these services were not subject to FCC common carrier regulation. However, effective June 12, 2015, the FCC reclassified mobile
(and fixed) broadband Internet access services as Title II telecommunications services pursuant to the Open Internet Order. The
Open Internet Order also adopted broad new net neutrality rules. For example, broadband providers may not block access to lawful
content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices. Broadband providers also may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic
on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices. In addition, broadband providers may not favor some lawful
Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind, and they may not prioritize the content and
services of their affiliates. Other than for paid prioritization, the rules contain an exception for “reasonable network
management.” The Open Internet Order recognizes that whether a network management practice is reasonable varies according
to the broadband technology involved and may provide more flexibility to implement network management practices in the context
of our capacity-constrained air-to-ground and satellite broadband networks.

Other jurisdictions may adopt similar or
different regulations that could affect our ability to use “network management” techniques. Likewise, the United States
and the European Union, among other jurisdictions, are considering proposals regarding data protection that, if adopted, could
impose heightened restrictions on certain of our activities relating to the collection and use of data of end users. Further, as
we promote exclusive content and services and increase targeted advertising with our media partners to customers of our services,
we may attract increased regulatory scrutiny.

We cannot be certain what positions regulators
may take regarding our compliance with, or lack of compliance with, current and future legal and regulatory requirements or what
positions regulators may take regarding any past or future actions we have taken or may take in any jurisdiction. Regulators may
determine that we are not in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and impose penalties, or we may need to make changes
to our services, which could be costly and difficult. Any of these events would adversely affect our operating results and business.

Our possession and use of personal
information and the use of credit cards by our customers present risks and expenses that could harm our business. Unauthorized
disclosure or manipulation of such data, whether through breach of our network security or otherwise, could expose us to costly
litigation and damage our reputation.

Maintaining our network security is of
critical importance because our online systems will store confidential registered user, employee and other sensitive data, such
as names, email addresses, addresses and other personal information. We will depend on the security of our networks and the security
of the network infrastructures of our third-party telecommunications service providers, our customer support providers and our
other vendors. Unauthorized use of our, or our third-party service providers’, networks, computer systems and services could
potentially jeopardize the security of confidential information, including credit card information, of our future customers. There
can be no assurance that any security measures we, or third parties, take will be effective in preventing these activities. As
a result of any such breaches, customers may assert claims of liability against us as a result of any failure by us to prevent
these activities. Further, our in-cabin network operates as an open, unsecured Wi-Fi hotspot, and non-encrypted transmissions users
send over this network may be vulnerable to access by users on the same plane. These activities may subject us to legal claims,
adversely impact our reputation, and interfere with our ability to provide our services, all of which could have a material adverse
effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to protect confidential customer
data or to provide customers with adequate notice of our privacy policies could also subject us to liabilities imposed by United
States federal and state regulatory agencies or courts. For example, the CPNI rules applicable to our satellite-based offerings,
require us to comply with a range of marketing and privacy safeguards. The FTC could assert jurisdiction to impose penalties related
our service if it found our privacy policies or security measures to be inadequate under existing federal law. We could also be
subject to certain state laws that impose data breach notification requirements, specific data security obligations, or other consumer
privacy-related requirements. Our failure to comply with any of these rules or regulations could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.

Other countries in which we may operate
or from which our services may be offered, including those in the European Union, also have certain privacy and data security requirements
that may apply to our business, either now or in the future. These countries’ laws may in some cases be more stringent than
the requirements in the United States. For example, European Union member countries have specific requirements relating to cross
border transfers of personal information to certain jurisdictions, including to the United States. In addition, some countries
have stricter consumer notice and/or consent requirements relating to personal information collection, use or sharing. Moreover,
international privacy and data security regulations may become more complex. For example, the European Union is considering a draft
proposed data protection regulation which, if enacted, may result in even more restrictive privacy-related requirements. Our failure
to comply with other countries’ privacy or data security-related laws, rules or regulations could also have an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

22

In addition, our customers will use credit
cards to purchase our products and services. Problems with our or our vendors billing software could adversely affect our customer
satisfaction and could cause one or more of the major credit card companies to disallow our continued use of their payment services.
In addition, if our billing software fails to work properly and, as a result, we do not automatically charge our subscribers’
credit cards on a timely basis or at all, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We depend upon third parties to manufacture
equipment components and to provide services for our network.

We rely on third-party suppliers for equipment
components that we use to provide our services. The supply of third- party components could be interrupted or halted by a termination
of our relationships, a failure of quality control or other operational problems at such suppliers or a significant decline in
their financial condition. If we are not able to continue to engage suppliers with the capabilities or capacities required by our
business, or if such suppliers fail to deliver quality products, parts, equipment and services on a timely basis consistent with
our schedule, our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We may fail to recruit, train and
retain the highly skilled employees that are necessary to remain competitive and execute our growth strategy. The loss of one or
more of our key personnel could harm our business.

Competition for key technical personnel
in high-technology industries such as ours is intense. We believe that our future success depends in large part on our continued
ability to hire, train, retain and leverage the skills of qualified engineers and other highly skilled personnel needed to maintain
and grow our business and technology. We may not be as successful as our competitors at recruiting, training, retaining and utilizing
these highly skilled personnel. In particular, we may have more difficulty attracting or retaining highly skilled personnel during
periods of poor operating performance. Any failure to recruit, train and retain highly skilled employees could negatively impact
our business and results of operations.

We depend on the continued service and
performance of our key personnel, including Jeffrey Wun, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Wun became our
Chief Executive Officer and President effective December 31, 2017 and was appointed Chairman on January 22, 2018. Mr. Wun replaced
Peter Chiou who was replaced from these positions and who we expect will become a consultant to the Company for a short period
of time. Such individuals have acquired specialized knowledge and skills with respect to our operations. As a result, if any of
these individuals were to leave us, we could face substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could experience a
loss of productivity while any such successor obtains the necessary training and expertise. We do not maintain key man insurance
on any of our officers or key employees. In addition, much of our key technology and systems are custom-made for our business by
our personnel. The loss of key personnel, including key members of our management team, as well as certain of our key marketing
or technology personnel, could disrupt our operations and have an adverse effect on our ability to grow our business.

We have identified material weaknesses
in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of internal controls, we
may not be able to accurately report our financial results and prevent fraud. As a result, current and potential stockholders could
lose confidence in our financial statements, which would harm the trading price of our common stock.

Companies that file reports with the SEC,
including us, are subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or SOX 404. SOX 404 requires management
to establish and maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting and annual reports on Form 10-K filed under the
Exchange Act to contain a report from management assessing the effectiveness of a company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Separately, under SOX 404, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, public
companies that are large accelerated filers or accelerated filers must include in their annual reports on Form 10-K an attestation
report of their regular auditors attesting to and reporting on management’s assessment of internal control over financial
reporting. Non-accelerated filers and smaller reporting companies, like us, are not required to include an attestation report of
their auditors in annual reports.

A report of our management is included
under “Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.” We are a smaller reporting company and, consequently, are not required
to include an attestation report of our auditor in our annual transition report. However, if and when we become subject to the
auditor attestation requirements under SOX 404, we can provide no assurance that we will receive a positive attestation from our
independent auditors.

During its evaluation of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, management identified a material weakness. The material
weakness was associated with our lack of sufficient and skilled accounting personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting
knowledge and experience in the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States commensurate with
our financial reporting requirements and our need to rely heavily on the use of external legal and accounting professionals to
mitigate these deficiencies. We are undertaking remedial measures, which measures will take time to implement and test, to address
this material weakness. There can be no assurance that such measures will be sufficient to remedy the material weakness identified
or that additional material weaknesses or other control or significant deficiencies will not be identified in the future. If we
continue to experience material weaknesses in our internal controls or fail to maintain or implement required new or improved controls,
such circumstances could cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our
financial statements, or adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and, if required, annual auditor attestation
reports. Each of the foregoing results could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and lead
to a decline in our stock price.

23

Our co-founder, Daniel Shih, would
be considered a “bad actor” under Rule 506(d) of the Securities Act but for the fact that SEC interpretations of Rule
506(d) provide that disqualification under Rule 506(d) is not triggered by actions taken in jurisdictions other than the United
States, such as convictions, court orders, or injunctions in a foreign court, or regulatory orders issued by foreign regulatory
authorities.

Our co-founder (and, thus, a “promoter”
as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act), Daniel Shih, was involved in two cases in Taiwan the first of which
could have resulted in his being deemed a “bad actor” under Rule 506(d) if such cases were in the United States and
not Taiwan. SEC compliance and disclosure interpretation 260.20 provides that disqualification under Rule 506(d) is not triggered
by actions taken in jurisdictions other than the United States and accordingly, Mr. Shih is not a bad actor because of such interpretation.

The first case related to the publicly
traded shares of Kitai Construction and Development Inc., a listed company on the Taiwanese over-the-counter market (“Kitai”).
From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Shih’s father served as the General Manager of Kitai. Prior to the annual meeting of the stockholders
in 2008, the incumbent management team, together with friends and family members (including Mr. Shih) collectively purchased a
large number of shares of Kitai common stock in the open market in order to obtain sufficient votes to maintain the current management
team’s control of Kitai. Kitai’s stock price fluctuated as a result of these purchases. Acting upon a report
from an opposing party in the fight for Kitai’s management control, the Taipei district prosecutor’s office brought
an action at the district court level, or the Court of First Instance, against several defendants, including Mr. Shih, alleging
a violation of the Taiwanese security law provision that prohibits “continuing buying of shares with an attempt to influence
stock prices.” Counsel for the defendants argued that there was no attempt to influence stock prices because (1) the
real purpose of the buying activities was to maintain management control of Kitai and was not to influence the stock prices and
(2) the defendants did not attempt to sell any of the shares and there was no sale of Kitai shares by the defendants during the
relevant time period. Prior to the incident that led to the charge, Mr. Shih owned no shares of Kitai stock and, other than
the fact that Mr. Shih’s father was General Manager of Kitai, he had no relationship with Kitai. In this case, the Court
of First Instance found Mr. Shih guilty and sentenced him to four years in prison. In August 2016, Mr. Shih filed with the Taiwanese
appellate court, or the Court of Second Instance, to appeal the decision of the Court of First Instance. Although only in
the preparatory states, the Court of Second Instance will conduct a full re-trial of the case, as is the practice under Taiwanese
law, with a full substantive review including both factual and legal aspects of the case. While this second trial is pending,
Mr. Shih’s sentence has been stayed, without bond. Because, as the defendant in the case, Mr. Shih’s personal appearance
will be required at most of the proceedings of the Court of Second Instance, which proceedings could continue for an extended period
of time, which would greatly affect Mr. Shih’s ability to conduct his business affairs, Mr. Shih may decide to negotiate
with the prosecutor for a settlement, which may result in probation and the payment of a penalty or the requirement to make a substantive
donation to public charities. Mr. Shih and his local legal counsel in Taiwan believe that the Court of First Instance was in error
in finding him guilty because he had no intent to manipulate the Kitai stock prices and Mr. Shih did not profit from his purchases
of Kitai shares.

In another case, in 2016, a significant
shareholder of PPTW, Chernan Technology Ltd., Co., or Chernan, filed a criminal complaint against several defendants alleging fraud
in inducing Chernan to purchase shares of PPTW. The case was accepted by the New Taipei prosecutors’ office. Although
Daniel Shih was not listed as a defendant, the original prosecutor assigned to this case believed that Mr. Shih possessed material
information relating to the defendants’ alleged activities and threatened to charge Mr. Shih if he did not cooperate. Subsequently,
a new prosecutor who was assigned to the case expressed his desire that the parties reach a private settlement so that the case
could be dismissed. The parties have formally begun a civil mediation process, and Mr. Shih is not a party in this mediation. If
there is no settlement in the mediation process, which could take from up to one to three years to resolve, the then prosecutor
would have to decide at that time whether to revert to the criminal proceeding or move to have the matter resolved through a civil
litigation. Mr. Shih and his local Taiwan legal counsel strongly believe that it is unlikely that Mr. Shih will be charged
in any criminal proceeding relating to this matter. Mr. Shih is the Chairman of Priceplay.com, Inc., a 70% owned subsidiary of
PPTW. Mr. Shih was not, and is not, an officer, director or stockholder of PPTW.

Daniel Shih has relinquished “beneficial
ownership” of substantially all of his equity interests in our company (whether held directly or indirectly) in a manner
acceptable to our company. This means that Mr. Shih no longer, directly or indirectly, through
any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise has or shares (i) voting power, which includes the power to
vote, or to direct the voting of, securities, and/or (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose, or to direct the
disposition of, shares of our common stock, except for a de minimus number of shares of our common stock which will continue to
be beneficially owned by him directly and by way of his being a control person in another entity that owns shares of our common
stock. Mr. Shih will, however, retain a pecuniary interest in some of the shares of our common stock over which he has relinquished
voting and investment power. Mr. Shih has also removed himself from any and all activities relating to our business, including,
but not limited to managerial, directional, advisory, promotional, developmental and fund-raising activities, effective
upon the effectiveness of the registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on December 20, 2017, as amended to date. Additionally,
Barbie Shih, Daniel Shih’s wife, was not re-elected to our board of directors on December 29, 2017. As a result of these
events, neither Mr. Shih nor Ms. Shih will maintain any active affiliation with, or material beneficial ownership interest in,
our company.

Mr. Shih will not be able to restore his
status as a “beneficial owner” of the shares of our common stock that he previously beneficially owned nor will he
be able to return to any active role or executive function in our company unless he is exonerated from any wrongdoing with respect
to the two matters in Taiwan discussed above or the relevant time period prescribed in Rule 506(d) has expired.

Due to the nature of the actions described
above involving our co-founder/ promoter, Daniel Shih, potential investors may not want to invest in our company and third parties
may not want to do business with us. The deterrence of investors from investing in our company or of third parties from doing business
with us because of reputational issues associated with the actions against Mr. Shih that are described above could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operations, results of operations and prospects.

24

We believe our business depends on
strong brands, and if we do not develop, maintain and enhance our brand, our ability to gain new customers and retain customers
may be impaired.

We believe that our brands will be a critical
part of our business. We expect to collaborate extensively with our future airline partners on the look and feel of the in-flight
homepage that their passengers encounter when logging into our service in flight. In order to maintain strong relationships with
our airline partners, we may have to reduce the visibility of our brand or make other decisions that do not promote and maintain
our brand. In addition, many of our trademarks contain words or terms having a somewhat common usage and, as a result, we may have
trouble registering or protecting them in certain jurisdictions. If we fail to promote and maintain our brand, or if we incur significant
expenses to promote the brands and are still unsuccessful in maintaining strong brands, our business prospects, financial condition
and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Businesses or technologies we acquire
could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our ongoing business, dilute stockholder value or have an adverse effect on our results
of operations.

As part of our business strategy, we may
engage in acquisitions of businesses or technologies to augment our organic or internal growth. We do not have any relevant experience
with integrating and managing acquired businesses or assets. Acquisitions involve challenges and risks in negotiation, execution,
valuation and integration. Moreover, we may not be able to find suitable acquisition opportunities on terms that are acceptable
to us. Even if successfully negotiated, closed and integrated, certain acquisitions may not advance our business strategy, may
fall short of expected return-on-investment targets or may fail. Any future acquisition could involve numerous risks, including:

●

potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management;

●

difficulty integrating the operations and products of the acquired business;

●

use of cash to fund the acquisition or for unanticipated expenses;

●

limited market experiences in new businesses;

●

exposure to unknown liabilities, including litigation against the companies we acquire;

●

additional costs due to differences in culture, geographical locations and duplication of key talent;

●

delays associated with or resources being devoted to regulatory review and approval;

difficulty integrating the financial results of the acquired business in our consolidated financial statements;

●

controls in the acquired business;

●

potential impairment of goodwill;

●

dilution to our current stockholders from the issuance of equity securities; or

●

potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired company.

In the event that we enter into any acquisition
agreements, closing of the transactions could be delayed or prevented by regulatory approval requirements, including antitrust
review, or other conditions. We may not be successful in addressing these risks or any other problems encountered in connection
with any attempted acquisitions, and we could assume the economic risks of such failed or unsuccessful acquisitions.

Expenses or liabilities resulting
from litigation could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

From time to time, we may be subject to
claims or litigation in the ordinary course of our business, including for example, claims related to employment matters and class
action lawsuits. Our operations are characterized by the use of new technologies and services across multiple jurisdictions that
implicate a number of statutory schemes and a range of rules and regulations that may be subject to broad or creative interpretation,
which may subject to us to litigation, including class action lawsuits, the outcome of which may be difficult to assess or quantify
due to the potential ambiguity inherent in these regulatory schemes and/or the nascence of our technologies and services. Plaintiffs
in these types of litigation may seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of the potential loss
relating to such lawsuits may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. Any such claims or litigation may be time-consuming
and costly, divert management resources, require us to change our products and services, or have other adverse effects on our business.
Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could require us to pay significant
monetary damages. In addition, costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce our existing contracts and, even
if successful, could have an adverse effect on us. In addition, prolonged litigation against any airline partner, customer or supplier
could have the effect of negatively impacting our reputation and goodwill with existing and potential airline partners, customers
and suppliers.

25

Technological advances may harm our
business.

Due to the widening use of state-of-the-art,
personal electronic devices such as Apple’s iPad, ever-increasing numbers of passengers have their own mobile devices, which
they might use to bring their own content such as movies, music or games with them on a flight. This could decrease demand for
our in-flight offerings. Carriers now also have greater technical means at their disposal to offer passengers in-flight access
to the Internet, including through our offerings and those of our competitors. At present, these offerings do not allow passengers
to fully stream content on their mobile devices. If, however, in-flight Internet access in the future allows passengers to fully
stream content on their mobile devices, this could decrease demand for our in-flight offerings. While both trends will give rise
to risks as well as opportunities for us, it is impossible to foresee at present whether and, if so, to what extent these trends
will have lasting effects. Note, too, that the in-flight entertainment systems currently in place are unable to support these developments.
Given average useful lives of 15 to 20 years, the conventional systems will continue to dominate the in-flight entertainment industry
for the foreseeable future. As a result, possible changes will happen slowly, giving all market players sufficient time to adapt.

We may have exposure to foreign currency
risks in the future and our future hedging activities could create losses.

Currency risks essentially arise from the
fact that sales to customers and purchasing are effected in one currency while fixed costs are incurred in other currencies. If
necessary, we will engage in hedging transactions to counteract direct currency risks. However, we cannot always guarantee that
all currency risks will have been hedged in full. Severe currency fluctuations could also cause the hedging transactions to fail
if agreed thresholds (triggers) are not met or exceeded. We therefore cannot fully preclude negative foreign currency effects in
the future - some of which might be substantial - due to unforeseen exchange rate fluctuations and/or inaccurate assessments of
market developments.

We will source our content from studios,
distributors and other content providers, and any reduction in the volume of content produced by such content providers could hurt
our business by providing us with less quality content to choose from and resulting in potentially less attractive offerings for
passengers.

We will receive content from studios, distributors
and other content providers, and in some circumstances, we will depend on the volume and quality of the content that these content
providers produce. If studios, distributors or other content providers were to reduce the volume or quality of content they make
available to us over any given time period, whether because of their own financial limitations or other factors influencing their
businesses, we would have less quality content to choose from and our programmers would have more difficulty finding relevant and
appropriate content to provide to our customers. This could negatively impact the passenger experience, which could in turn reduce
the demand for our offerings, which would have a negative impact on our revenue and results of operations.

We are a holding company with no
operations of our own, and we depend on our subsidiaries for cash.

Currently, we are a holding company and
do not have any material assets or operations other than ownership of equity interests of our subsidiaries. Our operations are
conducted almost entirely through our subsidiaries, and our ability to generate cash to meet our obligations or to pay dividends
is highly dependent on the earnings of, and receipt of funds from, our subsidiaries through dividends or intercompany loans. The
ability of our subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow from future operations to allow us and them to make scheduled payments
on our obligations will depend on their future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive
and business factors, many of which are outside of our control. We cannot assure you that the cash flow and future earnings of
our operating subsidiaries will be adequate for our subsidiaries to service their debt obligations. If our subsidiaries do not
generate sufficient cash flow from future operations to satisfy corporate obligations, we may have to: undertake alternative financing
plans (such as refinancing), restructure debt, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital.
We cannot assure you that any such alternative refinancing would be possible, that any assets could be sold, or, if sold, of the
timing of the sales and the amount of proceeds realized from those sales, that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable
terms, if at all, or that additional financing would be permitted under the terms of our various debt instruments then in effect.
Our inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable
terms, would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, we and our subsidiaries
may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future that may severely restrict or prohibit our subsidiaries from making
distributions, paying dividends or making loans to us.

Risks Relating to our Industry

Our business is highly dependent
on the airline industry, which is itself affected by factors beyond the airlines’ control. The airline industry is highly
competitive and sensitive to changing economic conditions.

Our business is directly affected by the
number of passengers flying on commercial aircraft, the financial condition of the airlines and other economic factors. If consumer
demand for air travel declines, including due to increased use of technology such as videoconferencing for business travelers,
or the number of aircraft and flights shrinks due to, among other reasons, reductions in capacity by airlines, the number of passengers
available to use our service will be reduced, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Unfavorable general economic conditions and other events that are beyond the airlines’ control, including higher unemployment
rates, higher interest rates, reduced stock prices, reduced consumer and business spending, terrorist attacks or threats and pandemics
could have a material adverse effect on the airline industry. A general reduction or shift in discretionary spending can result
in decreased demand for leisure and business travel and lead to a reduction in airline flights offered and the number of passengers
flying. Further, unfavorable economic conditions could also limit airlines’ ability to counteract increased fuel, labor or
other costs though raised prices. Our airline partners operate in a highly competitive business market and, as a result, continue
to face pressure on offerings and pricing. These unfavorable conditions and the competitiveness of the air travel industry could
cause one or more of our airline partners to reduce expenditures on passenger services including deployment of our service or file
for bankruptcy. Any of these events would have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results
of operations.

26

Air traffic congestion at airports,
air traffic control inefficiencies, weather conditions, such as hurricanes or blizzards, increased security measures, new travel-related
taxes, the outbreak of disease or any other similar event could harm the airline industry.

Airlines are subject to cancellations or
delays caused by factors beyond their control. Cancellations or delays due to weather conditions or natural disasters, air traffic
control problems, breaches in security or other factors could reduce the number of passengers on commercial flights and thereby
reduce demand for the services provided by us and our products and services and harm our businesses, results of operations and
financial condition.

Risks Relating to our Technology and
Intellectual Property

We could be adversely affected if
we suffer service interruptions or delays, technology failures or damage to our equipment.

Our reputation and ability to attract,
retain and serve our future commercial airline customers will depend upon the reliable performance of our satellite transponder
capacity, network infrastructure and connectivity system. We have experienced interruptions in these systems in the past, including
component and service failures that temporarily disrupted users’ access to the Internet, and we may experience service interruptions,
service delays or technology or systems failures in the future, which may be due to factors beyond our control. If we experience
frequent system or network failures, our reputation could be harmed and our future airline customers may have the right to terminate
their contracts with us or pursue other remedies.

Our operations and services will depend
upon the extent to which our equipment and the equipment of our third-party network providers is protected against damage from
fire, flood, earthquakes, power loss, solar flares, telecommunication failures, computer viruses, break-ins, acts of war or terrorism
and similar events. Damage to our networks could cause interruptions in the services that we will provide, which could have a material
adverse effect on service revenue, our reputation and our ability to attract or retain customers.

We rely on service providers for
certain critical components of and services relating to our satellite connectivity network.

We currently source key components of our
hardware, including the aircraft installed satellite antenna, from third parties and key aspects of our connectivity services,
including all of our satellite transponder services from SKY Perfect JSAT Corporation. While we have written contracts with these
key component and service providers, if we experience a disruption in the delivery of products and services from either of these
providers, it may be difficult for us to continue providing our own products and services to our customers. We have experienced
component delivery issues in the past and there can be no assurance that it will avoid similar issues in the future. Additionally,
the loss of the exclusive source protections that we have with our hardware provider could eliminate our competitive advantage
in the use of satellites for in-flight connectivity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Assertions by third parties of infringement,
misappropriation or other violation by us of their intellectual property rights could result in significant costs and substantially
harm our business and operating results.

In recent years, there has been significant
litigation involving intellectual property rights in many technology-based industries, including the wireless communications industry.
Any infringement, misappropriation or related claims, whether or not meritorious, is time-consuming, diverts technical and management
personnel and is costly to resolve. As a result of any such dispute, we may have to develop non-infringing technology, pay damages,
enter into royalty or licensing agreements, cease providing certain products or services or take other actions to resolve the claims.
These actions, if required, may be costly or unavailable on terms acceptable to us. Certain of our suppliers do not provide indemnity
to us for the use of the products and services that these providers supply to us. At the same time, we generally offer third-party
intellectual property infringement indemnity to our customers which, in some cases, does not cap our indemnity obligations and
thus could render us liable for both defense costs and judgments. Any of these events could result in increases in operating expenses,
limit our service offerings or result in a loss of business if we are unable to meet our indemnification obligations and our airline
customers terminate or fail to renew their contracts.

We may not be able to protect our
intellectual property rights.

We regard our trademarks, service marks,
copyrights, patents, trade secrets, proprietary technologies, domain names and similar intellectual property as important to our
success. We rely on trademark, copyright and patent law, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements with our employees,
vendors, airline customers, customers and others to protect our proprietary rights. We have sought and obtained patent protection
for certain of our technologies in the United States and certain other countries. Many of the trademarks that we use contain words
or terms having a somewhat common usage and, as a result, we may have difficulty registering them in certain jurisdictions. We
have not yet obtained registrations for our most important marks in all markets in which we may do business in the future, including
countries in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. If other companies have registered or have been using in commerce similar trademarks
for services similar to ours in foreign jurisdictions, we may have difficulty in registering, or enforcing an exclusive right to
use, our marks in those foreign jurisdictions.

27

There can be no assurance that our efforts
to protect our proprietary rights will be sufficient or effective, that any pending or future patent and trademark applications
will lead to issued patents and registered trademarks in all instances, that others will not develop or patent similar or superior
technologies, products or services, or that our patents, trademarks and other intellectual property will not be challenged, invalidated,
misappropriated or infringed by others. Additionally, the intellectual property laws and enforcement practices of other countries
in which our service is or may in the future be offered may not protect our products and intellectual property rights to the same
extent as the laws of the United States. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property from unauthorized use, our brand
image may be harmed and our business and results of operations may suffer.

Our use of open source software could
limit our ability to commercialize our technology.

Open source software is software made widely
and freely available to the public in human-readable source code form, usually with liberal rights to modify and improve such software.
Some open source licenses require as a condition of use that proprietary software that is combined with licensed open source software
and distributed must be released to the public in source code form and under the terms of the open source license. Accordingly,
depending on the manner in which such licenses were interpreted and applied, we could face restrictions on our ability to commercialize
certain of our products and we could be required to (i) release the source code of certain of our proprietary software to the public,
including competitors; (ii) seek licenses from third parties for replacement software; and/or (iii) re-engineer our software in
order to continue offering our products. Such consequences could materially adversely affect our business.

The satellites that we currently
rely on or may rely on in the future have minimum design lives, but could fail or suffer reduced capacity before then.

The usefulness of the satellites upon which
we currently rely and may rely on in the future is limited by each satellite’s minimum design life. For example, the satellites
through which we provide our service have minimum design lives ranging from 10 to 15 years. Our ability to offer in-flight connectivity
and alleviate capacity constraints throughout our network depends on the continued operation of the satellites or any replacement
satellites, each of which has a limited useful life. We can provide no assurance, however, as to the actual operational lives of
those or future satellites, which may be shorter than their design lives, nor can we provide assurance that replacement satellites
will be developed, authorized or successfully deployed.

In the event of a failure or loss of any
of these satellites, our satellite service providers may relocate another satellite and use it as a replacement for the failed
or lost satellite, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such a relocation
may require regulatory approval, including through, among other things, a showing that the replacement satellite would not cause
additional interference compared to the failed or lost satellite. We cannot be certain that our satellite service provider could
obtain such regulatory approval. In addition, we cannot guarantee that another satellite will be available for use as a replacement
for a failed or lost satellite, or that such relocation can be accomplished without disrupting or otherwise adversely impacting
our business.

Satellites that are not yet in service
are subject to construction and launch related risks.

Satellite construction and launch are subject
to significant risks, including delays, launch failure and incorrect orbital placement. Launch failures result in significant delays
in the deployment of satellites because of the need both to construct replacement satellites and to obtain other launch opportunities.
Construction and launch delays could materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.

A failure to raise sufficient capital
will delay or prohibit our building of a satellite ground station and related data center, which will inhibit our business development.

Because our IFEC services will require
the transmission and processing of large amounts of data, we will need to build satellite ground stations and related data centers
in our regions of operation, to facilitate the effectiveness and efficiency of our IFEC services. If we are not able to raise an
amount of capital sufficient to purchase land for and build a satellite ground station and data center near our area of operations,
initially in the Asia region, we may not be able to provide our IFEC services in an efficient and operationally effective way and,
as a result, our business prospects and results of operations could suffer.

Risks Related to Ownership of our Common
Stock

Our common stock is quoted on the
OTCQX Best Market, which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQX
Best Market. The OTCQX Best Market is a significantly more limited market than the New York Stock Exchange or The Nasdaq Stock
Market. The quotation of our shares on the OTCQX may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential stockholders
to trade shares of our common stock, could depress the trading price of our common stock and could have a long-term adverse impact
on our ability to raise capital in the future. We plan to list our common stock as soon as practicable. However, we cannot assure
you that we will be able to meet the initial listing standards of any stock exchange, or that we will be able to maintain any such
listing.

28

We cannot predict the extent to which
an active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained. If an active public trading market does not
develop or cannot be sustained, you may be unable to liquidate your investment in our common stock.

At present, there is minimal public trading
in our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for our common stock will develop or be sustained
due to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock
brokers, institutional investors, and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even
if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such
as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares of common stock until such time as we became more seasoned and viable.
As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent,
as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous
sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that an active public trading market for our common
stock will develop or be sustained. If such a market cannot be sustained, you may be unable to liquidate your investment in our
common stock.

Our common stock may be subject to
significant price volatility which may have an adverse effect on your ability to liquidate your investment in our common stock.

The market for our common stock may be
characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will be more
volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. The potential volatility in our share price is attributable to a number
of factors. First, our shares of common stock may be sporadically and/or thinly traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity,
the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our stockholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares
in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our
shares of common stock are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer that could better absorb
those sales without adverse impact on its share price. Secondly, an investment in us is a speculative or “risky” investment
due to our lack of meaningful profits to date and uncertainty of future profits. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse
investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more
inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a seasoned
issuer.

We may be subject to penny stock
regulations and restrictions and you may have difficulty selling shares of our common stock.

The SEC has adopted regulations which generally
define so-called “penny stocks” to be an equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share or an exercise
price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exemptions. Our common stock is a “penny stock” and is subject
to Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act, or the Penny Stock Rule. This rule imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers
that sell such securities to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” (generally, individuals
with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual incomes exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with their spouses). For transactions
covered by Rule 15g-9, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s
written consent to the transaction prior to sale. As a result, this rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities
and may affect the ability of purchasers to sell any of our securities in the secondary market, thus possibly making it more difficult
for us to raise additional capital.

For any transaction involving a penny stock,
unless exempt, the rules require delivery, prior to any transaction in penny stock, of a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC
relating to the penny stock market. Disclosure is also required to be made about sales commissions payable to both the broker-dealer
and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements are required to be sent
disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stock.

There can be no assurance that our common
stock will qualify for exemption from the Penny Stock Rule. In any event, even if our common stock were exempt from the Penny Stock
Rule, we would remain subject to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, which gives the SEC the authority to restrict any person
from participating in a distribution of penny stock, if the SEC finds that such a restriction would be in the public interest.

We have never paid cash dividends
on our stock and do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have paid no cash dividends on any class
of our stock to date and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the near term. For the foreseeable future, we intend to
retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends
on our common stock. Accordingly, investors must be prepared to rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation to
earn an investment return, which may never occur. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock. Any determination
to pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our results of operations,
financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our board deems relevant.

Our articles of incorporation, bylaws
and Nevada law have anti-takeover provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control, which may cause our stock
price to decline.

Our articles of incorporation, bylaws and
Nevada law contain provisions which could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if closing such a transaction
would be beneficial to our stockholders. We are currently authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of “blank check”
preferred stock. This preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined at the time of
issuance by our board of directors without further action by stockholders. The terms of any series of preferred stock may include
voting rights (including the right to vote as a series on particular matters), preferences as to dividend, liquidation, conversion
and redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. No shares of our preferred stock are currently outstanding. The issuance of
any preferred stock could materially adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock, and therefore, reduce the
value of our common stock. In particular, specific rights granted to future holders of preferred stock could be used to restrict
our ability to merge with, or sell our assets to, a third party and thereby preserve control by current management.

29

Provisions of our articles of incorporation,
bylaws and Nevada law also could have the effect of discouraging potential acquisition proposals or making a tender offer or delaying
or preventing a change in control, including changes a stockholder might consider favorable. Such provisions may also prevent or
frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management. In particular, our articles of incorporation, our bylaws
and Nevada law, as applicable, among other things, provide our board of directors with the ability to alter our bylaws without
stockholder approval, and provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled by a majority of directors in office,
although less than a quorum.

ITEM
1B.

UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM
2.

PROPERTIES.

Aircom currently leases approximately 4,958
square feet of space at 44043 Fremont Blvd., Fremont, CA 94538, comprised of administrative offices, from Global Venture Development,
LLC, which lease expires on May 31, 2017. On May 31, 2017, the lease was renewed for another three years and expires May 31, 2020.
We pay a monthly base rent of $6,446.

Aircom Japan leases approximately 78 square
meters of space at our Japan office. The lease expires on July 20, 2018 and the monthly lease payment is approximately $2,892.
Aircom Japan also leases additional space from Daniel Shih, the Company’s co-founder, at a cost of $1,215 per month.

We believe that our properties have been
adequately maintained, are generally in good condition, and are suitable and adequate for our business.

ITEM
3.

LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.

We are involved in legal proceedings in
the ordinary course of our business. Although our management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings with
certainty, it believes that the ultimate resolution of our legal proceedings, including any amounts we may be required to pay,
will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On or about July 27, 2016, AsiaSat initiated
an arbitration proceeding in the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre against Aircom, claiming a breach under the Digital
Transmission Service Agreement dated July 25, 2015 between AsiaSat and Aircom. AsiaSat claims that Aircom owes it approximately
$8.1 million in unpaid service fees, default payments and liquidated damages. Aircom disagrees with the payable balance and believes
that it owes AsiaSat approximately $1.3 million in services fees. Aircom has paid AsiaSat $875,000 as a security deposit. Aircom
further alleges misrepresentation from AsiaSat in entering into the agreement and is actively defending the matter. On November
21, 2016, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre appointed a sole arbitrator to hear the dispute. On January 12, 2017,
Aircom asserted a counterclaim against AsiaSat for misrepresentations made to induce entry into the agreement. Aircom and AsiaSat
reached a settlement with respect to the Agreement as of July 25, 2017, with an effective date of July 20, 2017.

Our common stock has been eligible for
quotation on the OTCQX market under the symbol “AKOM” since July 31, 2017. Prior to that, our common stock was quoted
on the OTCQB market. To date, there has been limited trading for our common stock on the OTC markets. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of our common stock. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices,
without retain mark-up or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

Closing Prices (1)

High

Low

USD

USD

2017

1st Quarter

0.20

0.20

2nd Quarter

5.50

5.50

3rd Quarter

6.00

6.00

4th Quarter

6.00

6.00

2018 (Transition Period)

1st Quarter

7.50

6.00

(1)

The
above table sets forth the range of high and low closing prices per share of our common stock as reported by www. Otcmarkets.com
for the periods indicated.

Number of Holders of Our Shares of Common
Stock

As of April 26, 2018, there were approximately
58 holders of record of our common stock. Because brokers and other institutions hold shares on behalf of stockholders,
we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid a cash dividend.
We currently intend to retain and use any future earnings for the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate
paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, if at all. Any future determination to declare dividends will be made at the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, general
business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

We have not sold any equity securities
during the 2017 fiscal year or during the Transition Period that were not previously disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q
or a current report on Form 8-K that was filed during the 2017 fiscal year or during the Transition Period.

Purchases of Equity Securities

No repurchases of our common stock were
made during the fourth quarter of 2017.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not applicable.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis
was prepared to supplement information contained in the accompanying financial statements and is intended to explain certain items
regarding the Company's financial condition as of March 31, 2018, and its results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

The following discussion and analysis
of our financial condition and result of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto
and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this transition report. In addition to historical information, the following
discussion contains certain forward-looking information. See “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” above
for certain information concerning those forward looking statements. Our financial statements are prepared in U.S. dollars and
in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

Overview

We are a full-service provider of IFEC
solutions. With advanced technologies and a unique business model, we plan to provide airline passengers with a true broadband
in-flight experience that encompasses a wide range of service options. Such options will include Wi-Fi, cellular networks, movies,
gaming, live TV, and music. We expect to offer these core services, which we are currently still developing, through both built-in
in-flight entertainment systems, such as a seatback display, as well as on passengers’ personal devices. We also expect to
provide content management services and e-commerce solutions.

We plan to partner with airlines and offer
airline passengers free IFEC services. We expect to generate revenues through advertising and in-flight transactions.

Our total sales were $0 and $0 for the
three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 and $0, $0 and $6,128,900 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. Our total sales of $6,128,900 in 2015 were non-recurring sales of equipment to related parties. Our net loss for
the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were $1,450,183 and $891,060, respectively. The net loss for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $7,132,464 and $3,176,464, respectively, as compared to a net income of $2,670,414 for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2015.

Principal Factors Affecting Financial
Performance

We believe that our operating and business
performance is driven by various factors that affect the commercial airline industry, including trends affecting the travel industry
and trends affecting the customer bases that we target, as well as factors that affect wireless Internet service providers and
general macroeconomic factors. Key factors that may affect our future performance include:

●

our ability to enter into and maintain long-term business arrangements with airline partners, which depends on numerous factors including the real or perceived availability, quality and price of our services and product offerings as compared to those offered by our competitors;

32

●

the extent of the adoption of our products and services by airline partners and customers;

●

costs associated with implementing, and our ability to implement on a timely basis, our technology, upgrades and installation technologies;

●

costs associated with and our ability to execute our expansion, including modification to our network to accommodate satellite technology, development and implementation of new satellite-based technologies, the availability of satellite capacity, costs of satellite capacity to which we may have to commit well in advance, and compliance with regulations;

●

costs associated with managing a rapidly growing company;

●

the number of aircraft in service in our markets, including consolidation of the airline industry or changes in fleet size by one or more of our commercial airline partners;

●

the economic environment and other trends that affect both business and leisure travel;

●

continued demand for connectivity and proliferation of Wi-Fi enabled devices, including smartphones, tablets and laptops;

●

our ability to obtain required telecommunications, aviation and other licenses and approvals necessary for our operations; and

●

changes in laws, regulations and interpretations affecting telecommunications services and aviation, including, in particular, changes that impact the design of our equipment and our ability to obtain required certifications for our equipment.

Going Concern Opinion

Our auditors have issued a going concern
opinion. This means that our auditors believe there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next
twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated significant revenues
and will incur additional expenses as a result of being a public reporting company. If we are unable to obtain additional working
capital, our business may fail. Accordingly, we must raise cash from sources other than operations. To date, we have financed our
operations primarily through cash flow from limited operations, augmented by cash proceeds from financing activities, short-term
borrowings and equity contributions by our stockholders. We must raise cash to implement our projected plan of operations.

Emerging Growth Company

We qualify as an “emerging growth
company” under the JOBS Act. As a result, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure
requirements. For so long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to:

●

have an auditor report on our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

●

comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis);

●

submit certain executive compensation matters to shareholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency;” and

●

disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the chief executive officer’s compensation to median employee compensation.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act
also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B)
of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay
the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected
to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable
to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

We will remain an “emerging growth
company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual
gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would occur if the market value of our ordinary shares that is held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which
we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

33

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months
Ended March 31, 2018 and 2017

The following table sets forth key components
of our results of operations during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

Three Months Ended

March 31,

Change

2018

2017

$

%

Sales

$

-

$

-

$

-

-

Cost of sales

-

-

-

-

Operating expenses

1,450,899

914,204

536,695

58.7

%

Loss from operations

(1,450,899

)

(914,204

)

(536,695

)

58.7

%

Net non-operating income (expense)

(4,222

)

25,529

(29,751

)

(116.5

)%

Loss before income taxes

(1,455,121

)

(888,675

)

(566,446

)

63.7

)%

Income tax expense

4,062

2,385

1,677

70.3

%

Net Loss

(1,459,183

)

(891,060

)

(568,123

)

63.7

%

Other comprehensive income (loss)

2,934

(3,347

)

6,281

(187.7

)%

Total comprehensive loss

$

(1,456,249

)

$

(894,407

)

$

(561,842

)

62.8

%

Sales.Our sales
were $0 for both three-month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 as we are still developing our core business in in-flight entertainment
and connectivity and there was no non-recurring sale of equipment to related parties during the periods.

Cost of sales. Our cost of
sales was $0 for both the three-month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 as we did not have any sales during the periods.

Operating expenses. Our operating
expenses increased by $536,695 to $1,450,899 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018, from $914,204 for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2017. Such increase was mainly due to the increase in stock-based compensation, R&D expense, payroll
and related expenses, consulting fees and investor relations expense of $266,806, $90,750, $72,350, $70,138 and $65,570, respectively,
which was offset by the decrease in legal expenses and travel expenses of $96,241and $140,932, respectively.

Net non-operating income (expense).
We had $4,222 in net non-operating expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018, as compared to net non-operating income
of $25,529 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017. Net non-operating expense in the three-month period ended March 31,
2018 represents interest expense of $1,266 and loss on foreign exchange of $3,022, while net non-operating expense in the three-month
period ended March 31, 2017 of $25,529 represents the cancellation of debt from a related party.

Loss before income taxes. Our
loss before income taxes increased by $566,446 to $1,455,121 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018, from a loss of $888,675
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2017, as a result of the factors described above.

Income tax expense.Income
tax expense increased to $4,062 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018, from the income taxes expense of $2,385 for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2017. The income tax expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018 was mainly due
to California franchise tax and foreign subsidiary’s income tax expenses.

Total comprehensive loss. As
a result of the cumulative effect of the factors described above, our total comprehensive loss increased by $561,842 to $1,456,249
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018, from a total comprehensive loss of $894,407 for the three-month period ended March
31, 2017.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2018, we had cash and cash
equivalents of $58,237. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through non-recurring sales of equipment in 2015 to
related parties, cash proceeds from financing activities, short-term borrowings and equity contributions by our stockholders.

The following table provides detailed information
about our net cash flow for the three months ended March 31, 2018:

34

Cash Flow

Three Months Ended
March 31,

2018

2017

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

$

(367,556

)

$

(987,976

)

Net cash used for investing activity

(6,352

)

-

Net cash provided by financing activity

407,707

1,530,000

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

33,799

182,024

Cash from acquired subsidiaries

-

-

Cash at beginning of year

21,504

312,173

Foreign currency translation effect on cash

2,934

(3,357

)

Cash at end of year

$

58,237

$

490,840

Operating Activities

Net cash used for operating activities
was $367,556 for the three months ended March 31, 2018, as compared to $987,976 for the three months ended March 31, 2017.
The decrease in net cash used for operating activities was mainly due to increase in accrued expenses, other payable – related
parties and other payable, and decrease in other payable related parties of $243,539, $217,183, $182,850 and $46,743, respectively,
offset by the increase in net operating loss and other receivable of $1,459,183 and $14,901, respectively.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for
the three months ended March 31, 2018 was $6,352. The net cash used in investing activities mainly related to the purchase
of property and equipment.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities
for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was $407,707 and $1,530,000, respectively. These net cash amounts provided by
financing activities were mainly attributable to proceeds from the increase in subscribed capital and short-term loans from
affiliates in the amount of $56,000 and $325,040, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and issuance of our common
stocks in the amount of $1,500,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Comparison of the Years Ended December
31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

The following table sets forth key components
of our results of operations during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

For the Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

Amount

% of Sales

Amount

% of Sales

Amount

% of Sales

Sales

$

-

-

$

-

-

$

6,128,900

100.0

%

Cost of sales

-

-

-

-

1,337,905

21.8

%

Operating expenses

7,147,597

-

3,970,105

-

1,235,796

20.2

%

Income (loss) from operations

(7,147,597

)

-

(3,970,105

)

-

3,555,199

58.0

%

Net non-operating income (expense)

23,652

-

(89,559

)

-

15

0.0

%

Income (loss) before income taxes

(7,123,945

)

-

(4,059,664

)

-

3,555,214

58.0

%

Income tax expense (benefit)

8,519

-

(883,200

)

-

884,800

14.4

%

Net income (loss)

(7,132,464

)

-

(3,176,464

)

-

2,670,414

43.6

%

Other comprehensive income (loss)

(3,454

)

-

(10

)

-

-

-

Total comprehensive income (loss)

$

(7,135,918

)

-

$

(3,176,474

)

-

$

2,670,414

43.6

%

Sales. Our sales were $0
for each of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, as compared to the $6,128,900 for the same period in 2015. The decrease
is because we are still developing our core business in on-board entertainment and connectivity and did not generate any recurring
sales in 2017 and 2016, while the sales of $6,128,900 in 2015 were from a non-recurring sale of equipment to related parties.

Cost of sales. Our cost of
sales includes the direct costs of our raw materials and component parts, as well as the cost of labor and overhead. Our cost of
sales was $0 for both of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 as we did not have any sales during the period, compared to
the $1,337,905 for the same period in 2015 as a result of the non-recurring sales of equipment to related parties.

35

Operating expenses. Our operating
expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits, professional advisor fees, cost of promotion, business development, business
travel, transportation costs, and other expenses incurred in connection with general operations. Our operating expenses increased
by $3,177,492 to $7,147,597 for the year ended December 31, 2017, from $3,970,105 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Such increase
was mainly due to the increase in stock-based compensation, satellite service fees, investor relations and securities registration
expenses, payroll and related expenses, legal expense, accounting fees, travel expenses and consulting fees of $1,729,446, $382,281,
$671,058, $578,903, $306,694, $457,736, $138,965 and $269,453, respectively, which was offset by the decrease in R&D and outsourcing
expenses of $1,231,202 and $144,623, respectively. Our operating expenses increased by $2,734,309, or 221.3%, to $3,970,105 for
the year ended December 31, 2016, from $1,235,796 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Such increase was mainly due to the increase
in R&D expenses, amortization expenses, outside services, payroll expenses and consulting fees, by the amount of $1,572,184,
$412,500, $290,000, $531,381 and $125,399, respectively, offset by the decrease in marketing expenses by the amount of $169,081.
The increase in payroll expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 is due to all payroll expenses in 2016 being classified as
operating expenses while a portion of the payroll expenses, $652,800, was classified as cost of sales in 2015.

Net non-operating income (expense).
We had $23,652 in net non-operating income for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $89,559 in net non-operating expense for the
year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the net non-operating income of $15 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Net non-operating
income for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily represents the cancellation of debt from a related party of $26,647, while
net non-operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of interest expense.

Income (loss) before income taxes.
Our loss before income taxes is $7,123,945 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the loss before income taxes for
the year ended December 31, 2016 of $4,059,664, an increase of $3,064,281. Our loss before income taxes is $4,059,664 for the year
ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the income before income taxes of $3,555,214 for the year ended December 31, 2015, increased
by $7,614,878, as a result of the factors described above.

Income tax expense- (benefit).Income
tax expense increased to $8,519 for the year ended December 31, 2017, from an income tax benefit of $883,200 for the year ended
December 31, 2016. The income tax expense for 2017 was mainly due to California franchise tax and foreign subsidiary’s income
tax expenses. Income tax benefit increased to $883,200 for the year ended December 31, 2016, from the income taxes expense of $884,800
for the year ended December 31, 2015. The income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to the operating loss
reducing the taxable income carried over from December 31, 2015.

Total comprehensive (income) loss. As
a result of the cumulative effect of the factors described above, our total comprehensive loss increased by $3,959,444 to $7,135,918
for the year ended December 31, 2017, from $3,176,474 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and our total loss increased by $5,846,888
to $3,176,474 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from a net income of $2,670,414 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017, we had cash and
cash equivalents of $21,504. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through non-recurring sales of equipment in 2015
to related parties, cash proceeds from financing activities, short-term borrowings and equity contributions by our stockholders.

The following table provides detailed information
about our net cash flow for all financial statement periods presented in this report:

Cash Flow

December 31,

2017

2016

2015

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

$

(6,001,485

)

$

(1,225,102

)

$

3,094,442

Net cash used for investing activity

(273,015

)

(4,006,285

)

(5,728,508

)

Net cash provided by financing activity

5,984,941

5,502,422

864,452

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(289,559

)

271,035

(1,769,614

)

Cash from acquired subsidiaries

2,354

21,650

-

Foreign currency translation effect on cash

(3,464

)

(10

)

-

Cash at beginning of year

312,173

19,498

1,789,112

Cash at end of year

$

21,504

$

312,173

$

19,498

36

Operating Activities

Net cash used for operating activities
was $6,001,485 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to $1,225,102 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase
in net cash used for operating activities was mainly due to net operating loss, increase in prepaid expenses, and decrease in other
payable related parties of $7,132,464, $521,949 and $2,373,180, respectively, offset by the decrease in other receivable-related
party and deposits-others, increase in accrued expenses and other payable of $162,335, $660,132, $506,822 and $392,299, respectively.
Net cash used for operating activities was $1,225,102 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the cash provided
by operating activities of $3,094,442 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in net cash used for operating activities
for the year ended December 31, 2016 was mainly due to net operating loss, increase in deposits-others, decrease in other payable-related
party and other payable-others of $3,176,464, $382,534, $1,638,890 and $133,759, respectively, offset by the increase in accounts
receivable-related party, prepaid expenses and other receivable-related party of $3,478,900, $116,327 and $166,180, respectively.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for
the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $273,015, $4,006,285 and $5,728,508, respectively. The net cash used
in investing activities mainly related to the purchase of property and equipment in the amount of $273,015 in 2017 and the
purchase of property and equipment and acquisition of goodwill in the amount of $3,686,597 and $319,688, respectively, in 2016, and acquisitions of intangible assets of $4,950,000 in 2015.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities
for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $5,984,941, $5,502,422 and $864,452, respectively. These net cash amounts
provided by financing activities were mainly attributable to proceeds from the issuance of our common stock and subscribed
capital in the amounts of $5,914,941, $5,463,038 and $864,452 during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Currently available working capital will
not be adequate to sustain our operations at our current levels for the next twelve months. We expect to satisfy our working capital
requirements over the next twelve months through the sale of equity or debt securities. However, we do not have any commitment
from any third-party to invest in our company or otherwise acquire any of our equity or debt securities. Furthermore, even if we
successfully raise sufficient capital to satisfy our needs over the next twelve months, in the future, we will require additional
cash resources due to changed business conditions, implementation of our strategy to expand our business or other investments or
acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If our own financial resources are insufficient to satisfy our capital requirements, we may
seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain additional credit facilities. The sale of additional equity securities
could result in dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations
and could require us to agree to operating and financial covenants that would restrict our operations. Financing may not be available
in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any failure by us to raise additional funds on terms favorable to us, or at
all, could limit our ability to expand our business operations and could harm our overall business prospects.

Capital Expenditures

Our operations continue to require significant
capital expenditures primarily for technology development, equipment and capacity expansion. Capital expenditures are associated
with the supply of airborne equipment to our prospective airline partners, which correlates directly to the roll out and/or upgrade
of service to our prospective airline partners’ fleets. Capital spending is also associated with the expansion of our network,
ground stations and data centers and includes design, permitting, network equipment and installation costs.

Capital expenditures for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $97,102, $0, $639,062, $5,603,534
and $5,053,573, respectively.

We anticipate an increase in capital spending
in fiscal year 2018 and estimate that capital expenditures will range from $6 million to $60 million as we begin airborne equipment
installations and continue to execute our expansion strategy.

Inflation

Inflation and changing prices have not
had a material effect on our business and we do not expect that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our business
in the foreseeable future. However, our management will closely monitor price changes in our industry and continually maintain
effective cost control in operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements
that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to an investor
in our securities.

Seasonality

Our operating results and operating cash
flows historically have not been subject to significant seasonal variations. This pattern may change, however, as a result of new
market opportunities or new product introductions.

37

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make assumptions, estimates
and judgments that affect the amounts reported, including the notes thereto, and related disclosures of commitments and contingencies,
if any. We have identified certain accounting policies that are significant to the preparation of our financial statements. These
accounting policies are important for an understanding of our financial condition and results of operation. Critical accounting
policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s
difficult, subjective, or complex judgment, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their
significance to financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting the estimate may differ significantly
from management’s current judgments. We believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most significant estimates
and judgments used in the preparation of our financial statements:

Revenue Recognition. We recognize
sales when the earning process is completed, as evidenced by an arrangement with the customer, transfer of title and acceptance,
if applicable, has occurred, as well as the price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Sales are recorded
net of returns, discounts and allowances.

Inventories. Inventories
are recorded at the lower of weighted-average cost or net realizable value. We assess the impact of changing technology on our
inventory on hand and write off inventories that are considered obsolete. Estimated losses on scrap and slow-moving items are recognized
in the allowance for losses.

Research and Development Costs.
Research and development costs are charged to operating expenses as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we
incurred approximately $366,000 and $1,597,000 of research and development costs, respectively.

Property and Equipment. Property
and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. When value impairment is determined, the related assets are stated
at the lower of fair value or book value. Significant additions, renewals and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs
are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed by using the straight-line method and double declining method over the following
estimated service lives: computer equipment - 3 to 5 years, furniture and fixtures - 5 years and satellite equipment – 5
years. Construction costs for on-flight entertainment equipment not yet in service are recorded under construction in progress.
Upon sale or disposal of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the corresponding
accounts, with any gain or loss credited or charged to income in the period of sale or disposal. We review the carrying amount
of property and equipment for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets
may not be recoverable. We determined that there was no impairment loss for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Goodwill and Purchased Intangible
Assets. Goodwill represents the amount by which the total purchase price paid exceeded the estimated fair value of net
assets acquired from acquisition of subsidiaries. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or
circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. Purchased intangible assets with finite life are amortized on the straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of respective assets. Purchased intangible assets with indefinite life are evaluated for
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. As
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, purchased intangible asset consists of satellite system software and is amortized over 10 years.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
We utilize the three-level valuation hierarchy for the recognition and disclosure of fair value measurements. The categorization
of assets and liabilities within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement
of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy consist of the following:

Level 1 – Inputs to the
valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability
to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Inputs to the
valuation methodology are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are
not active or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full
term of the instrument.

Level 3 – Inputs to the
valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based upon management’s best estimate of inputs market participants could use
in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions.

The carrying amounts of our cash, accounts
receivable, other receivable, short-term loans, accounts payable, and other payable approximated their fair value due to the short-term
nature of these financial instruments.

Foreign Currency Translation. If
a foreign subsidiary’s functional currency is the local currency, translation adjustments will result from the process of
translating the subsidiary’s financial statements into the reporting currency of our company. Such adjustments are accumulated
and reported under other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of stockholder’s equity.

38

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Financial Instruments

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”), which updates certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure
of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods
within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-01 on its consolidated financial
statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,
“Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU
2016-13”), which modifies the measurement of expected credit losses of certain financial instruments. ASU 2016-13 will be
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.

Intangibles

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.
2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which goodwill
shall be tested at least annually for impairment at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 will be effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2017-04 on
its consolidated financial statements.

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.
2016-02, “Leases” (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which modifies lease accounting for both lessees and lessors
to increase transparency and comparability by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified
as operating leases under previous accounting standards and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02
will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and
early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the timing of its adoption and the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 on our
consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting
standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity
expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017, and interim periods within that reporting period.

The new revenue standards may be applied
retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption.
We currently expect to adopt the new revenue standards in its first quarter of 2018 utilizing either a retrospective basic or modified
retrospective basic method. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new revenue standards on our consolidated financial
statements.

Income Taxes

In October 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-16,
“Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory” (“ASU 2016-16”), which
requires the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the
transfer occurs. ASU 2016-06 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and for the Company
in its first quarter of 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-16 on its consolidated financial
statements.

39

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The full text of our audited financial statements as of December
31, 2017 and 2016 and for the Transition Period begins on page F-1 of this report.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange
Act, our management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation and under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March
31, 2018. Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer determined
that, because of the material weakness described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting refers
to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting
officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(2)

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and

(3)

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Our management evaluated the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2018. In making this evaluation, management used the framework
established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission,
or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including (i) the control
environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. Based on our
evaluation, we determined that, as of March 31, 2018, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the
following material weakness:

●

We do not have sufficient and skilled accounting personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge and experience in the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. To mitigate the current limited resources and limited employees, we rely heavily on the use of external legal and accounting professionals.

40

In order to cure the foregoing material
weakness, we have taken or plan to take the following remediation measures:

●

In April 2017, we retained Mr. Y. Tristan Kuo as our Chief Financial Officer, who will oversee the improvement of our disclosure controls and procedures, as well as internal control over financial reporting. In addition, we hired an experienced staff accountant in August 2017 to enhance the functionality of our accounting department.

●

In addition, we will look to hire additional personnel with technical accounting expertise to further support our current accounting personnel. As necessary, we will continue to engage consultants or outside accounting firms in order to ensure proper accounting for our consolidated financial statements.

We intend to complete the remediation of
the material weakness discussed above as soon as practicable but we can give no assurance that we will be able to do so. Designing
and implementing an effective disclosure controls and procedures is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react
to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to devote significant resources to maintain a financial
reporting system that adequately satisfies our reporting obligations. The remedial measures that we have taken and intend to take
may not fully address the material weakness that we have identified, and material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures
may be identified in the future. Should we discover such conditions, we intend to remediate them as soon as practicable. We are
committed to taking appropriate steps for remediation, as needed.

All internal control systems, no matter
how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting

We regularly review our system of internal
control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while
ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more
efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes.

There have been no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION.

We have no information to disclose that
was required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the Transition Period, that is, the quarter ended March 31, 2018, but
was not reported.

41

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the
name, age, position and date of appointment of each of our directors and executive officers as of April 26, 2018. Each director
serves until our next annual meeting or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Each executive officer
serves until the earlier of his or her death or resignation, or his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

Name

Age

Position

Date of Appointment

Jeffrey Wun

51

Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman

December 29, 2017

Y. Tristan Kuo

63

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

April 10, 2017

James J. Busuttil

59

Director

December 29, 2017

Raymond Choy

37

Director

December 29, 2017

Chih-Ming (Albert) Hsu

42

Director

December 29, 2017

Colin Lim

53

Director

February 13, 2017

Jan-Yung Lin

56

Secretary and Director

February 13, 2017

Jeffrey Wun. Mr. Wun has
served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since December 31, 2017. Mr. Wun has been a member of our board of directors
since the reverse acquisition of Aircom on February 13, 2017 and was appointed as Chairman of the board of directors on January
22, 2018. Mr. Wun previously served as our President, Treasurer and Secretary from December 2016 to February 2017. Mr. Wun has
served as Aircom’s Chief Technology Officer since December 2014. Mr. Wun is a technologist with more than 25 years of experience
in the communications industry. Prior to joining Aircom Mr. Wun served as Senior Staff Engineer at Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
from December 2012 to May 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Wun was a profession engineer at MediaTEK USA Inc. from November 2010 to December
2012 and served as Chief Executive Officer at Kairos System Inc. from 2003 to 2010. Mr. Wun received a Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry
and Computer Science from Chinese University of Hong Kong in 1988.

Y. Tristan Kuo. Mr. Kuo has
served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since April 10, 2017. Mr. Kuo has served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of Aircom since May 2017. Mr. Kuo has more than 30 years of experience in accounting, financing and information systems for companies
in the bio-pharmaceutical, manufacturing, commodity trading and banking industries and has served in the capacities of CFO, CIO
and Controller. Mr. Kuo has served as the Vice President of Investor Relations of Nutrastar International, Inc. (OTCPK: NUIN) since
April 2016. Mr. Kuo also served as the Chief Financial Officer of Success Holding Group International, Inc., a provider of personal
improvement seminars, from August 2015 to April 2017. Prior to that, he served as CFO/CIO Partner of Tatum, a management and advisory
services firm, from December 2014 to August 2015, as an independent board member and audit committee chairman of KBS Fashion Group
Limited (NASDAQ: KBSF) from August 2014 to May 2015, and as the Chief Financial Officer of Crown Bioscience, Inc. from June 2012
to November 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Kuo served as Chief Financial Officer of China Biologic Products, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBPO), a Chinese
biopharmaceutical company, from June 2008 to May 2012 and served as its Vice President of Finance between September 2007 and May
2008. Prior to that, Mr. Kuo worked for the Noble Group in Hong Kong as the Senior Business Analysis Manager from February through
August 2007 and as the Controller, Vice President of Finance and CFO of Cuisine Solution, Inc., a previously publicly traded company
in Alexandria, Virginia, from December 2002 to January 2007. Mr. Kuo also served as the Vice President of Information Systems for
Zinc Corporation of America in Monaca, Pennsylvania from 2001 and 2002 and as Chief Information Officer and Controller of Wise
Metals Group in Baltimore, Maryland, from 1991 to 2001. Mr. Kuo received his Master’s degree in Accounting from The Ohio
State University and Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Soochow University, Taipei.

42

James J. Busuttil. Dr. James
Busuttil has served as a member of our Board since December 2017. Dr. Busuttil is an attorney admitted to practice before the courts
of New York State since 1983, as well as numerous U.S. Federal Trial and Appeals Courts, practicing international, financial and
corporate law. Dr. Busuttil was elected as a Life Fellow of the U.K.-based Institute of Directors (IoD). Members are invited to
become Fellows of the IoD based on their substantial and sustained experience and contribution to business. Fellows are required
to have been a company director for at least five years and, at some point during this period, the entity must have had an annual
turnover or budget that exceeds £10 million. Dr. Busuttil has represented banks and financial institutions based in the United
States and other countries in private sector financing of domestic and international projects, negotiated alternative energy project
financings, handled transnational mergers and joint ventures, represented equity investors in venture capital transactions and
organized investment funds. In addition, Dr. Busuttil represented the Bank Advisory Group for a major Latin American debtor nation
in sovereign debt restructuring and handled a variety of private sector Latin American debt restructures. Dr. Busuttil has been
a Member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) since 2007. The PCA is the oldest international tribunal in the world established
by the 1907 Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. Membership of the PCA is strictly by nomination of
contracting states of individuals of known competency in questions of international law, of the highest moral reputation, and disposed
to accept the duties of Arbitrator. Dr. Busuttil is also a Member of the London Court of International Arbitration Users’
Council. With respect to arbitration, Dr. Busuttil has been involved mainly in investment disputes. Dr. Busuttil created the University
of London’s Postgraduate Laws Program. Dr. Busuttil directed the University of London’s Master of Laws (LL.M.), Postgraduate
Diploma in Laws (PG Dip. Laws) and the Postgraduate Certificate in Laws (PG Cert. Laws) from January 2004 to January 2015. Under
Dr. Busuttil’s leadership, the Program grew to over 3,000 persons from more than 150 countries. Dr. Busuttil was appointed
as an Honorary Professor at the Faculty of Law of University College London (UCL) in 2004. Dr. Busuttil has been a member of the
Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs, of the Council on Foreign Relations, and of the Executive Council of the American
Society of International Law. In the course of work, Dr. Busuttil has developed experience and understanding in dealing with parties
and organizations, including the private and public sectors, in South East Asia, East Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Russia, North
Africa and Australasia.

Raymond Choy. Mr. Raymond
Choy has served as a member of our Board since December 2017. Mr. Choy has served as a member of from the Board of Aircom since
October 2017. Mr. Choy became a certified public accountant (CPA) in the state of California in 2006 and also received his chartered
global management accountant (CGMA) designation in 2013. Mr. Choy has provided accounting, consulting and advisory services to
public and private companies since July 2016 through his partnership with Beyond Century Consulting, LLC, a financial and business
consulting company. Mr. Choy has extensive experience auditing the financial statements and internal controls of public and private
companies as a senior manager at Frazer, LLP, a certified public accountants company, from July 2004 to June 2016. Mr. Choy received
his bachelor’s degree with in business administration with accounting concentration and minor in computer information systems
from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, in 2003. Mr. Choy was selected to serve as a member of our board of directors
due to his accounting background.

Chih-Ming (Albert) Hsu. Mr.
Chih-Ming (Albert) Hsu has served as a member of our Board since December 2017. Mr. Hsu has served as a member of Aircom’s
board since April 2017. Mr. Hsu was admitted to practice law in Taiwan as a corporate and business lawyer and as a patent attorney
in 2002. Mr. Hsu is the owner of Chascord Law Firm. Mr. Hsu previously served as the arbitrator & mediator of the Chinese Arbitration
Association, Taipei. In addition, Mr. Hsu was the Chairman of Unitel High Technology Corporation, a listed company on the Taiwan
over-the-counter market from December 2015 to September 2016. Mr. Hsu received an LL.M and Bachelor of Law degree from National
Taiwan University in 2003 and 1997, respectively. Mr. Hsu is an expert of real estate securitization in Taiwan.

Colin Lim. Mr. Colin Lim
has served as a member of our board of directors since the reverse acquisition of Aircom on February 13, 2017 and served as a member
of Aircom’s board from July 2015 to February 2017. In 2013, Mr. Lim founded Dynasty Media & Entertainment Group, a movie
production and distribution company and an investment company with interests in a variety of businesses, including restaurants,
wood and timber traders, exotic leather manufacturers, movie producers, copyrights transaction companies, and entertainment businesses,
as well as hi-tech companies, and is the Managing Director who oversees financing, investment, copyrights. Mr. Lim has served as
Executive Chairman of Sunny Leather from June 2006 and is responsible for general management. Mr. Lim has served as Executive Chairman
of Anson International since March 2003 where he oversees investments. Mr. Lim has served as Managing Director of Euroamerica International
since December 1999 where he oversees management and trading operations of the company. Mr. Lim’s investment experience in
the movie and copyright businesses has allowed us to better negotiate and acquire sufficient movie copyrights and entertainment
content to complement our business model. Mr. Lim graduated from New South Wales University in Australia, where he received his
degree in engineering and business.

43

Jan-Yung Lin. Mr. Jan-Yung
Lin has served as a member of our board of directors since the reverse acquisition of Aircom on February 13, 2017, and as Secretary
since December 2016. Mr. Lin served as Aircom’s President since June 2017, as Aircom’s Chief Executive Officer from
February 2015 to October 2016, as Aircom’s Chief Operating Officer from September 2014 to February 2015, and as a director
of Aircom from September 2014 to February 2017. Mr. Lin has practiced corporate and business law at Concorde Law PC as a solo practitioner
since 2012. Prior to that Mr. Lin was the General Counsel and Chief Financial Officer of EMG Properties, Inc. in California. Prior
to that Mr. Lin was a corporate associate of Goodwin Procter LLP. Mr. Lin graduated magna cum laude from Cornell Law School
with a J.D. degree and an LL.M. degree in International and Comparative Law. Mr. Lin received an M.B.A. degree from the University
of California, Berkeley and a Bachelor’s degree from the National Taiwan University.

Directors and executive officers are elected
until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

There are no arrangements or understandings
known to us pursuant to which any director was or is to be selected as a director (or director nominee) or executive officer. There
are no agreements or understandings for any of our executive officers or directors to resign at the request of another person and
no officer or director is acting on behalf of nor will any of them act at the direction of any other person.

Except as set forth in our discussion below
in “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Transactions with Related Persons,”
none of our directors, director nominees or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors,
executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among
any of our officers or directors.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our
directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

●

been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offences);

●

had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;

●

been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

●

been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

●

been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

●

been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

44

Board Composition and Committees

Our board of directors is comprised of
six members: Jeffrey Wun, James J. Busuttil, Raymond Choy, Chih-Ming (Albert) Hsu, Colin Lim and Jan-Yung Lin. Our board of directors
has determined that Messrs. Busuttil, Choy and Lim are independent directors as that term is defined in the rules of the Nasdaq
Stock Market. Choy, Lim and Busuttil are each members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance
Committee.

Our board of directors currently has three
standing committees which perform various duties on behalf of and report to the board of directors: (i) Audit Committee, (ii) Compensation
Committee and (iii) Nominating and Governance Committee. Each of the three standing committees is comprised entirely of independent
directors. From time to time, the board of directors may establish other committees.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

Our board of directors plays an active
role, as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing management of our risks and strategic direction. Our board of directors
regularly reviews information regarding our liquidity and operations, as well as the risks associated with each. Our Audit Committee
oversees the process by which our senior management and relevant employees assess and manage our exposure to, and management of,
financial risks. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our executive compensation
plans and arrangements. Our Nominating and Governance Committee also manages risks associated with the independence of members
of our board of directors and potential conflicts of interest. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks
and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire board of directors is regularly informed about such risks.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee currently consists
of Messrs. Busuttil, Choy and Lim, with Mr. Choy serving as chairman. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Choy is an
audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K, and each member of our Audit Committee is able
to read and understand fundamental financial statements and has substantial business experience that results in such member’s
financial sophistication.

Accordingly, our board of directors believes
that each member of our Audit Committee has sufficient knowledge and experience necessary to fulfill such member’s duties
and obligations on our Audit Committee. The primary purposes of our Audit Committee are to assist our board of directors in fulfilling
its responsibility to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of our company and audits of our financial statements,
including (i) reviewing the scope of the audit and all non-audit services to be performed by our independent accountant and the
fees incurred by us in connection therewith, (ii) reviewing the results of such audit, including the independent accountant’s
opinion and letter of comment to management and management’s response thereto, (iii) reviewing with our independent accountants
our internal accounting principles, policies and practices and financial reporting, (iv) engaging our independent accountants and
(v) reviewing our quarterly and annual financial statements prior to public issuance. The role and responsibilities of our Audit
Committee are more fully set forth in a written Charter adopted by our board of directors on June 6, 2017, which is available on
our website at www.aerkomm.com.

Compensation Committee

Our board of directors established our
Compensation Committee effective as of January 22, 2018, appointing Messrs. Busuttil, Choy and Lim as members, with Mr. Lim serving
as chairman of this committee. The Compensation Committee is structured as follows: The primary purpose of our Compensation Committee
is to assist our board of directors in fulfilling its responsibility to determine the compensation of our executive officers and
to approve and evaluate the compensation policies and programs of our company, including (i) reviewing the compensation packages
of executive officers and making recommendations to our board of directors for said compensation packages, (ii) reviewing and approving
proposed stock incentive grants and (iii) providing our board of directors with recommendations regarding bonus plans, if any.
The role and responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are more fully set forth in a written Charter adopted by our board
of directors and made available on our website at www.aerkomm.com.

The policies underlying our Compensation
Committee’s compensation decisions are designed to attract and retain the best-qualified management personnel available.
We routinely compensate our executive officers through salaries. At our discretion, we may reward executive officers and employees
through bonus programs based on profitability and other objectively measurable performance factors. Additionally, we use stock
options and other incentive awards to compensate our executives and other key employees to align the interests of our executive
officers with the interests of our stockholders. In establishing executive compensation, our Compensation Committee will evaluate
compensation paid to similar officers employed at other companies of similar size in the same industry and the individual performance
of each officer as it impacts our overall performance with particular focus on an individual’s contribution to the realization
of operating profits and the achievement of strategic business goals. Our Compensation Committee will further attempt to rationalize
a particular executive’s compensation with that of other executive officers of our company in an effort to distribute compensation
fairly among the executive officers. Although the components of executive compensation (salary, bonus and incentive grants) will
be reviewed separately, compensation decisions will be made based on a review of total compensation.

45

Nominating and Governance Committee

Our board of directors established our
Nominating and Governance Committee effective January 22, 2018, appointing Messrs. Busuttil, Choy and Lim as members, with Mr.
Busuttil serving as chairman of this committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee is structured as follows: The primary purposes
of our Nominating and Governance Committee are to (i) identify individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors
and recommend to our board of directors the nominees for the next annual meeting of our stockholders and candidates to fill vacancies
on our board of directors, (ii) recommend to our board of directors the directors to be appointed to committees of our board of
directors and (iii) oversee the effectiveness of our corporate governance in accordance with regulatory guidelines and any other
guidelines we establish, including evaluations of members of executive management, our board of directors and its committees. The
role and responsibilities of our Nominating and Governance Committee are more fully set forth in a written Charter adopted by our
board of directors and made available on our website at www.aerkomm.com.

Our Nominating and Governance Committee’s
methods for identifying candidates for election to our board of directors (other than those proposed by our stockholders, as discussed
below) includes the solicitation of ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources - members of our board of directors,
our executives, individuals personally known to the members of our board of directors, and other research. Our Nominating and Governance
Committee may also, from time-to-time, retain one or more third-party search firms to identify suitable candidates.

A stockholder of our company may nominate
one or more persons for election as a director at an annual meeting of stockholders if the stockholder complies with the notice,
information and consent provisions contained in our Bylaws. In addition, the notice must be made in writing and set forth as to
each proposed nominee who is not an incumbent Director (i) their name, age, business address and, if known, residence address,
(ii) their principal occupation or employment, (iii) the number of shares of stock of our company beneficially owned, (iv) a description
of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any other person pursuant to which the nominations
are to be made and (v) any other information concerning the nominee that must be disclosed respecting nominees in proxy solicitations
pursuant to Rule 14(a) of the Exchange Act. The recommendation should be addressed to our Secretary.

Among other matters, our Nominating and
Governance Committee will:

●

Review the desired experience, mix of skills and other qualities to assure appropriate board composition, taking into account the current members of our board of directors and the specific needs of our company and our board of directors;

●

Conduct candidate searches, interviews prospective candidates and conducts programs to introduce candidates to our management and operations, and confirms the appropriate level of interest of such candidates;

●

Recommend qualified candidates who bring the background, knowledge, experience, independence, skill sets and expertise that would strengthen and increase the diversity of our board of directors; and

●

Conduct appropriate inquiries into the background and qualifications of potential nominees.

Code of Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a Code
of Ethical Conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, and other executive and senior financial officers. Our board of directors has also adopted a separate Code of Professional
Conduct for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. These codes are available in the Corporate Governance Code of
Ethical Conduct section of our website, www.aerkomm.com.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance

On April 19, 2018, we filed a Form 8-A
with the SEC to register our common stock under the Securities Exchange Act. As a result of this filing, we are now subject to
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. And all of our officers, directors and 10-percent beneficial owners of our common stock filed
initial Forms 3 with the SEC on April 19, 2018.

46

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary Compensation Table – Three
Months Ended March 31, 2018 and Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

The following table sets forth information
concerning all cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the named persons for services rendered in all capacities
during the noted periods. No other executive officers received total annual salary and bonus compensation in excess of $100,000.

Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary

($)

Option Awards

($)(1)

All Other Compensation

($)

Total

($)

Jeffrey Wun, CEO and President (2)(3)

Three months 2018

40,000

-

-

40,000

2017

160,000

46,914

-

206,914

2016

141,641

-

-

141,641

Y. Tristan Kuo, CFO (4)

Three months 2018

25,000

-

-

25,000

2017

72,752

938,277

-

1,011,029

2016

-

-

-

-

Jiun-Sheuan Yang (2)(5)

Three months 2018

40,000

-

-

40,000

2017

160,000

-

-

160,000

2016

128,308

-

-

128,308

Peter Chiou, Former CEO and President (2)(6)

Three months 2018

-

-

-

-

2017

24,000

3,002,486

50,000

3,076,486

2016

-

-

45,600

45,600

(1)

These
amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value for options granted to the named executive officers computed in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(2)

On
February 13, 2017, we acquired Aircom in a reverse acquisition transaction that was structured as a share exchange. The annual,
long term and other compensation shown in this table include the amounts that the named executive officer received from Aircom
prior to the consummation of the reverse acquisition.

(3)

Mr.
Wun has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since December 31, 2017, upon the resignation of Mr. Chiou from these
positions, and previously served as our President from December 28, 2016 until February 13, 2017. He also currently serves as
the Chief Technology Officer of Aircom.

(4)

Mr.
Kuo has served as our Chief Financial Officer since April 10, 2017.

(5)

Mr.
Jiun-Sheuan Yang has served as Aircom’s Vice President of Engineering since December 2014.

(6)

Mr.
Chiou was replaced from his positions as President and Chief Executive Officer effective December 30, 2017. The amount included
in all other compensation represents consulting fees paid by Aircom to Mr. Chiou.

Employment Agreements

Y. Tristan Kuo

On March 31, 2017, we entered into an employment
agreement with Mr. Kuo, effective April 10, 2017, pursuant to which we agreed to pay Mr. Kuo an annual salary of $100,000, plus
a guaranteed bonus of $85,000 payable on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of Mr. Kuo’s employment or (ii) upon closing
of an equity or equity linked financing in which we or one of our subsidiaries raises at least $15 million. Mr. Kuo will also be
entitled to an annual bonus as recommended by our Chief Executive Officer and approved by our board of directors. In addition,
we agreed to grant Mr. Kuo an option to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock, with one quarter of the shares underlying
the option to be vested immediately and the remaining shares to be vested equally over three years on each anniversary of Mr. Kuo’s
employment. Such option granted under our 2017 equity incentive plan once such plan is approved by our stockholders. In addition,
during the first nine months of Mr. Kuo’s employment or until he relocates, if earlier, we also agreed to provide a furnished
living accommodation, a car allowance of $400 per month, and a personal travel allowance of $600 per month for Mr. Kuo to visit
his spouse or vice versa. We also agreed to pay up to $6,000 in relocation expenses, should Mr. Kuo decide to relocate. We will
also be responsible for medical insurance under our medical plan or we will reimburse the premium of a medical plan that is comparable
to the medical plan offered to other employees. Mr. Kuo will also be eligible to participate in other standard benefits plans offered
to similarly situated employees by us from time to time.

The employment agreement also contains
covenants prohibiting Mr. Kuo from competing with us during his employment, or from soliciting any of our employees or consultants
for a period of two years after his employment ends. The employment agreement also contains customary confidentiality provisions.
The employment agreement may be terminated by either party for any reason upon 30 days’ notice. If Mr. Kuo’s employment
is terminated by us without cause, the portion of stock options to be vested for the year if completed shall be vested immediately.

47

Peter Chiou

On November 29, 2017, we entered into
an employment agreement with Mr. Chiou, effective November 1, 2017, pursuant to which we agreed to pay Mr. Chiou an annual salary
of $144,000. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Chiou was entitled to twenty (20) working days of vacation per year and was eligible
to participate in other standard benefits plans offered to similarly situated employees by us from time to time. Following Mr.
Chiou’s resignation effective December 31, 2017, the employment agreement effectively terminated. We expect that Mr. Chiou
will become a consultant for a short period of time and will be paid a $5,000 consulting fee per month upon his entering into
a consulting and separation agreements with us.

Outstanding Equity Awards at March 31,
2018 and Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

There were no outstanding options held
by our named executive officers as of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017, Mr. Kuo had options outstanding and exercisable for 300,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $5.50 per
share, and Mr. Wun had options outstanding and exercisable for 15,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $5.50
per share.

Effective December 29, 2017, we entered
into independent director agreements with James Busuttil, Raymond Choy, and Colin Lim. Under the terms of these independent director
agreements, we have agreed to pay the independent directors an annual cash fee of $20,000, paid quarterly in four equal installments,
commencing in the first quarter following closing of our public offering, and an additional $5,000 cash compensation fee for serving
as board of directors committee chairmen. This additional fee will be paid no later than the fifth business day following the filing
of this report with the SEC.

Each independent director is entitled to
receive an initial, fully vested stock option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock. If the director is still a member
of the board of directors and continues to serve as a non-employee director immediately following each annual meeting of our stockholders,
the director will be automatically granted an additional option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock as of the date of
each such annual meeting. These additional option grants will vest and become exercisable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments
over the first year following the date of grant, subject to the director continuing in service on the board of directors through
each such vesting date. The per share exercise price of each option granted to the independent director will equal 100% of the
fair market value (as defined by the board of directors) of a share of our common stock on the date the option is granted, and
the term of each stock option granted to the director will be ten (10) years from the date of grant.

We also agreed to purchase directors and
officers liability insurance with coverage up to an aggregate maximum of $3 million commencing promptly following the final closing
of our public offering, and to reimburse the independent directors for pre-approved reasonable business expenses incurred by them.

The following table sets forth information
regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 27, 2018 (i) by each person who is known by us to beneficially own
more than 5% of our common stock; (ii) by each of our officers and directors; and (iii) by all of our officers and directors as
a group. Unless otherwise specified, the address of each of the persons set forth below is in care of the Company, 923 Incline
Way #39, Incline Village, NV 89451.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Title of Class

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)

Percent of Class (2)

Jeffery Wun, CEO, President and Director (3)

Common Stock

14,187,138

34.05

%

Y. Tristan Kuo, CFO (4)

Common Stock

137,500

*

James Busuttil, Director (5)

Common Stock

20,000

*

Raymond Choy, Director (6)

Common Stock

20,000

*

Chih-Ming (Albert) Hsu, Director (7)

Common Stock

16,557

*

Colin Lim, Director (8)

Common Stock

20,000

*

Jan-Yung Lin, Director (9)

Common Stock

2,312,010

5.55

%

All officers and directors as a group (7 persons named above)

Common Stock

16,714,033

40.11

%

Dmedia Holding LP (10)

Common Stock

11,187,138

26.85

%

Sheng-Chun Chang (11)

Common Stock

7,029,891

16.87

%

* Less than 1%

(1)

Beneficial
Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect
to securities. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire
beneficial ownership within 60 days. Each of the beneficial owners listed above has direct ownership of and sole voting power
and investment power with respect to the shares of our common stock.

(2)

A
total of 41,460,097 shares of our common stock are considered to be outstanding pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3(d)(1) as of April 27,
2018. For each beneficial owner above, any options exercisable within 60 days have been included in the denominator.

(3)

Includes
11,187,138 shares of our common stock owned by Dmedia Holding LP. On December 20, 2017, Mr. Wun purchased an 85.7%
interest in, and was appointed Manager of, Dmedia LLC, the General Partner of Dmedia Holding LP. As such, Mr. Wun is deemed
to be the beneficial owner of the 11,187,138 shares of our common stock held by Dmedia Holding LP by virtue of his voting and
dispositive power of those shares. Through his ownership interest in Dmedia LLC which owns an approximately 6% direct interest
in Dmedia Holding LP, Mr. Wun indirectly beneficially owns 588,005 shares of our common stock held by Dmedia Holding LP. Mr.
Wun disclaims beneficial ownership of the remaining 10,599,133 shares of our common stock held by Dmedia Holding LP. Also
includes 763,400 shares of our common stock over which Mr. Wun has the voting and investment power by virtue of his being the
Trustee of the BNDD Trust which owns these shares. Mr. Wun disclaims beneficial ownership of these 763,400 shares. Does
not include 15,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days.

(4)

Consists
of 137,500 shares of our common stock which Mr. Kuo has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of vested options
but does not include 162,500 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days.

(5)

Consists
of 20,000 shares of our common stock which Mr. Busuttil has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of vested
options.

(6)

Consists
of 20,000 shares of our common stock which Mr. Choy has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of vested options.

(7)

Consists
of 16,557 shares of our common stock owned directly by Mr. Hsu prior to his appointment to our Board of Directors.

(8)

Consists
of 20,000 shares of our common stock which Mr. Lim has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of vested options
but does not include 60,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days.

(9)

Includes
of 1,864,524 shares of our common stock owned by Mr. Lin directly and 447,486 shares of our common stock owned by Mr. Lin’s
spouse. Does not include 4,796,150 shares of our common stock owned by Mr. Lin through his approximately 7% ownership interest
in Dmedia LLC and his approximately 42.4% interest Dmedia Holding LP, as Mr. Lin does not, directly or indirectly, have voting
or dispositive power over these shares although he does own a pecuniary interest in them. Does not include 15,000 shares
of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of options not exercisable within 60 days.

(10)

Mr.
Wun has sole voting and dispositive power over these shares of our common stock although he disclaims beneficial ownership of
10,599,133 of these shares. Mr. Lin owns a pecuniary interest in 4,796,150 of these shares although he does not exercise
voting or dispositive control over them. Mr. Shih owns a pecuniary interest in 4,990,291 of these shares although he does
not exercise voting or dispositive power over them. The address of Dmedia Holding LP is 91 Gregory Ln Ste 5, Pleasant Hill,
CA 94523.

(11)

Consists
of 6,703,487 shares of common stock held by Well Thrive Limited and 326,404 shares of our common stock owned directly by Mr. Sheng-Chun
Chang. Mr. Chang is the Chief Executive Officer and owner of Well Thrive Limited and has voting and dispositive power of the securities
held by it. Mr. Chang disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Well Thrive Limited. The address of Well Thrive Limited
is No 79, Heng Yang Road, Taipei City, Taiwan.

49

Changes in Control

There are currently no arrangements which
may result in a change of control of our company.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth certain
information about the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

Plan category

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

-

-

-

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

6,646,307

$

1.7210

3,353,693

Total

6,646,307

$

1.7210

3,353,693

Equity Compensation Plan Information

On May 5, 2017, we established our 2017
Equity Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The Plan was approved by our board of directors on May 5, 2017, and an amendment
to increase the number of shares of our common stock available for grant under the Plan was approved by the board of directors
on June 26, 2017. We expect that the Plan will be approved by our stockholders at our annual meeting in 2018. The purpose of the
Plan is to grant stock and options to purchase our common stock to our employees, directors and key consultants. The maximum number
of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the Plan, as amended, is 10,000,000 shares. Cancelled
and forfeited stock options and stock awards may again become available for grant under the Plan. There were 4,054,011 shares available
for grant under the Plan as of March 16, 2018; 4,661,308 shares of our common stock are issuable upon the exercise of options to
be issued under the Plan to holders of Aircom options assumed by us as a result of the closing of the reverse acquisition with
Aircom; and options exercisable for 1,265,000 shares of our common stock have been approved by our board of directors for grants
to certain of our officers, directors, employees and service providers.

Equity Compensation Plan and Employee
Benefits

Summary of the 2017 Equity Incentive
Plan

The following summary briefly describes
the principal features of the Plan and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Plan.

Administration. The Plan is administered
by our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee has the authority to select the eligible participants to whom awards
will be granted, to determine the types of awards and the number of shares covered and to set the terms, conditions and provisions
of such awards, to cancel or suspend awards under certain conditions, and to accelerate the exercisability of awards. Our Compensation
Committee is authorized to interpret the Plan, to establish, amend, and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the Plan,
to determine the terms of agreements entered into with recipients under the Plan, and to make all other determinations that may
be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan.

Eligibility. All employees, directors
and individuals providing services to our company or its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Plan.

Shares Subject to Plan. The number
of shares of common stock that is available for grant of awards under the Plan, as amended, is 10,000,000 shares.

50

Stock Option and SAR Grants. The
exercise price per share of common stock purchasable under any stock option or stock appreciation right, or SAR, will be determined
by our Compensation Committee, but cannot in any event be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date
the option is granted. Our Compensation Committee will determine the term of each stock option or SAR (subject to a maximum of
10 years) and each stock option or SAR will be exercisable pursuant to a vesting schedule determined by our Compensation Committee.
The grants and the terms of incentive stock options, or ISOs, shall be restricted to the extent required for qualification as ISOs
by the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. Subject to approval of our Compensation Committee, stock options or SARs may be exercised
by payment of the exercise price in cash, shares of our common stock, which have been held for at least six months, or pursuant
to a “cashless exercise” through a broker-dealer under an arrangement approved by us. We may require the grantee to
pay to us any applicable withholding taxes that we are required to withhold with respect to the grant or exercise of any award.
The withholding tax may be paid in cash or, subject to applicable law, our Compensation Committee may permit the grantee to satisfy
such obligations by the withholding or delivery of shares of our common stock. We may withhold from any shares of our common stock
issuable pursuant to a stock option or SAR or from any cash amounts otherwise due from us to the recipient of the award an amount
equal to such taxes.

Stock Grants. Shares may be sold
or awarded for consideration and with or without restriction as determined by the Compensation Committee, including cash, full-recourse
promissory notes, as well as past and future services. Any award of shares will be subject to the vesting schedule, if any, determined
by the Compensation Committee. In general, holders of shares sold or awarded under the Plan will have the same voting, dividend
and other rights as our other stockholders. As a condition to the purchase of shares under the Plan, the purchaser will make such
arrangements as our Compensation Committee may require for the satisfaction of any federal, state, local or foreign withholding
tax obligations that may arise in connection with such purchase.

Adjustments. In the event of any
change affecting the shares of our common stock by reason of any stock dividend or split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation,
spin-off, combination or exchange of shares or other similar corporate change, or any distribution to stockholders other than cash
dividends, our board of directors will make such substitution or adjustment in the aggregate number of shares that may be distributed
under the Plan and in the number and option price (or exercise or purchase price, if applicable) as it deems to be appropriate
in order to maintain the purpose of the original grant.

Termination of Service. If a participant’s
service to our company terminates on account of death or disability, then the participant’s unexercised options, if exercisable
immediately before the participant’s death, disability or retirement, may be exercised in whole or in part, on the earlier
of the date on which such stock option would otherwise expire or one year after the event. If a participant’s service to
us terminates for any other reason, then the participant’s unexercised options, to the extent exercisable immediately before
such termination, will remain exercisable, and may be exercised in whole or in part, for a period ending on the earlier of the
date on which such stock option would otherwise expire or three months after such termination of service.

Amendment and Termination. Our board
of directors may, at any time, alter, amend, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan; provided that such action shall not adversely
affect the right of grantees to stock awards or stock options previously granted and no amendment, without the approval of our
stockholders, shall increase the maximum number of shares which may be awarded under the Plan in the aggregate, materially increase
the benefits accruing to grantees under the Plan, change the class of employees eligible to receive options under the Plan, or
materially modify the eligibility requirements for participation in the Plan.

The following includes a summary of transactions
since the beginning of the 2016 fiscal year, or any currently proposed transaction, in which we were or are to be a participant
and the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end
for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest
(other than compensation described under “Item 11. Executive Compensation”). We believe the terms obtained or consideration
that we paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions described below were comparable to terms available
or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arm’s-length transactions.

●

On December 28, 2016, Aircom entered into a stock purchase agreement with Ms. Irina Goldman, our sole director and officer and principal stockholder at such time, and Aircom, pursuant to which Aircom purchased all 700,000 shares of our common stock held by Ms. Goldman for $320,000. Such shares represented approximately 86.3% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of the closing of such acquisition by Aircom.

●

On February 13, 2017, we entered into a share exchange agreement with Aircom, our then principal stockholder, and its shareholders, whereby we acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Aircom in exchange for 40,000,000 shares of our common stock and we also agreed to issue options to acquire 5,444,592 shares of our common stock to Aircom’s option holders in exchange for their options to purchase Aircom’s common stock. In addition, at the closing of the reverse acquisition, Aircom returned all 700,000 shares of our common stock purchased by it on December 28, 2016 and we immediately cancelled such shares, and all existing options to purchase Aircom’s shares of common stock were also canceled.

51

●

On March 31, 2017, we entered into a settlement and release agreement with Aircom and dMobile, a Taiwanese limited company whose Chairman of the Board is Daniel Shih, our co-founder, a former material beneficial owner of our common stock and husband of our former director Barbie Shih. Aircom and dMobile entered into a certain Purchase Agreement for Ground Station Equipment, dated as of October 15, 2014, or the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which Aircom delivered to dMobile certain equipment with an aggregate invoice price of $5,478,900 and received from dMobile $2,000,000 in partial payment, as a result of which dMobile owed Aircom a balance of $3,478,900 under the Purchase Agreement. Aircom and dMobile also entered into a certain Statement of Work, dated January 15, 2015, or the Statement of Work, pursuant to which dMobile delivered to Aircom certain intangible property with an aggregate invoice price of $4,950,000 and received from Aircom $1,000,000 in partial payment, as a result of which Aircom owed dMobile $3,950,000 under the Statement of Work. Offsetting the amounts Aircom and dMobile owed to each other under the Purchase Agreement and the Statement of Work, Aircom owed dMobile a net amount of $471,100, or the Outstanding Amount. To settle this amount, Aircom and dMobile entered into the settlement and release agreement with respect to these matters pursuant to which (i) the Purchase Order and the Statement of Work were terminated and dMobile agreed to accept, and we agreed to issue to dMobile, 94,220 shares of our common stock valued at $5.00 per share in full settlement of the Outstanding Amount, or the dMobile Settlement Shares and (ii) Aircom and dMobile each agreed to waive, release, discharge and covenant not to sue each other with respect to any and all possible claims arising out of or relating to the Purchase Order, the Statement of Work, and the Outstanding Amount. Because Daniel Shih owns dMobile, he is the beneficial owner of the dMobile Settlement Shares, and Barbie Shih, a former director of the Company and Mr. Shih’s wife, is thus deemed to be the beneficial owner of the dMobile Settlement Shares.

●

On March 31, 2017, we entered into a settlement and release agreement with Aircom and PPUS, a Delaware corporation of which Daniel Shih, our co-founder and husband of our former director Barbie Shih, is the Chairman of the board of directors. Aircom and PPUS entered into a certain Development Agreement, dated February 10, 2015, as amended by the First Amendment to Development Agreement, dated July 17, 2015 and the Second Amendment to Development Agreement, dated August 18, 2015, or, as amended, the Development Agreement, pursuant to which Aircom and PPUS agreed to jointly develop certain AirCinema airplane seating technology and related products. Aircom and PPUS fully performed the specified terms of the Development Agreement with the exception that a deposit of $387,500 was advanced by PPUS to Aircom, or the Deposit, for which the Aircom and PPUS did not reach agreement as to the scope of work to be covered by the Deposit. Additionally, PPUS also advanced an additional deposit of $349,500, or the Additional Deposit, to Aircom with the intent that the Additional Deposit would be applied towards one or more additional projects that Aircom and PPUS would agree to in the future. Aircom and PPUS agreed to conclude their relationship with respect to the Development Agreement, the Deposit and the Additional Deposit and other prior dealings between them, and to settle all accounts between them. Aircom and PPUS entered into the settlement and release agreement with respect to these matters pursuant to which (i) the Development Agreement was deemed completed and terminated and PPUS agreed to accept, and we agreed to issue to PPUS, 147,400 shares of our common stock valued at $5.00 per share in full settlement of the Deposit and Additional Deposit amounts, or the PPUS Settlement Shares and (ii) Aircom and PPUS each agreed to waive, release, discharge and covenant not to sue each other with respect to any and all possible claims arising out of or relating to the Development Agreement, , the Deposit and the Additional Deposit. Because Daniel Shih is the Chairman of PPUS and, thus, has voting and dispositive power over the PPUS Settlement Shares, under U.S. federal securities regulations he is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the PPUS Settlement Shares even though he is not a shareholder of PPUS. Because Barbie Shih, a former director of the Company, is Daniel Shih’s wife, she is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the PPUS Settlement Shares as well. Both Daniel Shih and Barbie Shih disclaim beneficial ownership of the PPUS Settlement Shares.

●

On March 31, 2017, we entered into a settlement
and release agreement with Aircom and Priceplay Taiwan Inc., or PPTW, a Taiwanese limited company and parent of PPUS, its wholly
owned subsidiary. Aircom and PPTW entered into a certain purchase order, or the Purchase Order, pursuant to which PPTW agreed to
purchase from Aircom a set of mobile satellite communication equipment priced at $909,000. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase
Order, PPTW paid Aircom $819,300, or the Initial Payment and Aircom delivered to PPTW a mobile satellite antenna, together with
radome, control unit, power supply, and other associated items, or collectively, the Equipment. PPTW raised certain issues regarding
the Equipment and informed us that it desired to return the Equipment to Aircom and to receive a refund of the Initial Payment.
Aircom and PPTW entered into the settlement and release agreement with respect to these matters pursuant to which (i) Aircom and
PPTW agreed to terminate the Purchase Order, (ii) PPTW agreed to return the Equipment to Aircom, (iii) PPTW agreed to accept, and
we agreed to issue to PPTW, 163,860 shares of our common stock valued at $5.00 per share in full settlement of the Initial Payment
amount, or the PPTW Settlement Shares and (ii) Aircom and PPTW each agreed to waive, release, discharge and covenant not to sue
each other with respect to any and all possible claims arising out of or relating to the Purchase Order or the Initial Payment.
Because Daniel Shih is the Chairman of PPUS, under U.S. federal securities regulations he may be deemed to be an affiliate or controlling
person of PPTW, the parent of PPUS, its wholly owned subsidiary. As such Daniel Shih may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of
the PPTW Settlement Shares even though he is not a shareholder or officer or director of PPTW. Because Barbie Shih, a former director
of the Company, is Daniel Shih’s wife, she may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the PPTW Settlement Shares as well.
Both Daniel Shih and Barbie Shih disclaim beneficial ownership of the PPTW Settlement Shares.

The three settlement and mutual release
agreements discussed above are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 10.13, 10.14 and 10.15.

Daniel Shih is the co-founder of Aircom
and, thus, is a “promoter” of the Company as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933.

52

●

On July 5, 2017, we entered into a subscription agreement with Daniel Shih, the co-founder and an affiliate of the Company, who agreed to purchase an aggregate of 5,000 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at a price of $5.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase of $27,500. These shares were offered and sold by us to Mr. Shih in a private placement offering exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.

●

Aircom Japan also leases space from Daniel
Shih at a cost of $1,215 per month. Daniel Shih’s father, Giretsu Shih, is the President of Aircom Japan and is paid an annual
salary of approximately $90,000.

Mr. Shih has relinquished “beneficial
ownership” of substantially all of his equity interests in the Company (whether held directly or indirectly) in a manner
acceptable to the Company. Mr. Shih has also removed himself from any and all activities
relating to our business, including, but not limited to managerial, directional, advisory, promotional, developmental and fund-raising
activities. As a result of Mr. Shih’s disposition of his equity interests in the Company and his removing himself
from participation in any Company related business activities, and Ms. Shih’s not being re-elected to the Company’s
board of directors, Mr. Shih no longer maintains any active affiliation with, or material beneficial ownership in, the Company.

In the event that Mr. Shih is exonerated
from any wrongdoing with respect to the two Taiwanese matters discussed in the Risk Factors section above, Mr. Shih’s status
as a “beneficial owner” of the shares of our common stock that he previously beneficially owned and his ability to
take an active role in the development and management of the Company may be restored.

●

On March 9, 2015, we entered into a 10-year
purchase agreement with Klingon, pursuant to which we agreed to sell our in-flight connectivity systems to Klingon for joint development
and resale to Hong Kong based airlines under the brand name Aircom4U. In accordance with the terms of this agreement, Klingon agreed
to purchase from us an initial order of onboard equipment comprising an onboard system for a purchase price of $909,000, with payments
to be made in accordance with a specific milestones schedule. To date, we have received $762,000 from Klingon in milestone payments
towards the equipment purchase price. Daniel Shih was Chairman of Klingon from February 2015 to February 2016, and Peter Chiou,
our former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, was Chief Executive Officer and President of Klingon from March 2015
through April 2016, prior to joining our company in February 2017. Neither Mr. Shih or Mr. Chiou owns any capital stock of Klingon.
Mr. Chiou agreed to step down from his positions with our company effective December 31, 2017. We expect that Mr. Chiou will become
a consultant for a short period of time and will be paid $5,000 per month effective upon his entering into consulting and separation
agreement with us.

Our board of directors conducts an appropriate
review of and oversees all related party transactions on a continuing basis and reviews potential conflict of interest situations
where appropriate. Our board of directors has not adopted formal standards to apply when it reviews, approves or ratifies any related
party transaction. However, our board of directors generally reviews related party transactions to ensure that they are fair and
reasonable to our company and on terms comparable to those reasonably expected to be agreed to with independent third parties for
the same goods and/or services at the time they are authorized by our board of directors.

53

Director Independence

Our board of directors has determined that
Messrs. Raymond Choy, Colin Lim and James Busuttil are independent directors as that term is defined in the applicable rules of
the Nasdaq Stock Market.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

Independent Auditors’ Fees

The following is a summary of the fees
billed to the Company for professional services rendered for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and the fiscal years ended December
31, 2017 and 2016:

Three Months Ended March 31,

Year Ended
December 31,

2018

2017

2016

Audit Fees

$

50,000

$

156,000.00

$

30,000.00

Audit-Related Fees

-

2.58

87.80

Tax Fees

-

36,000.00

-

All Other Fees

-

38,000.00

-

TOTAL

$

50,000

$

230,002.58

$

30,087.80

“Audit Fees” consisted of fees
billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review
of the financial statements included in our Form 10-K and 10-Q or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection
with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

“Audit-Related Fees” consisted
of fees billed for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that were reasonably related to the performance of
the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under the paragraph captioned “Audit Fees” above.

“Tax Fees” consisted of fees
billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax returns preparation.

“All Other Fees” consisted
of fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported above under other
captions of this Item 14.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all
audit and non-audit services performed by our auditors must be approved in advance by our board of directors to assure that such
services do not impair the auditors’ independence from us. In accordance with its policies and procedures, our board of directors
pre-approved the audit service performed by Chen & Fan for our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,
2017.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

Financial Statements and Schedules

The financial statements are set forth
under Item 8 of this transition report on Form 10-KT. Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are either not
required, not applicable, or the information is otherwise included.

Exhibit List

The list of exhibits in the Exhibit Index
to this report is incorporated herein by reference.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of AERKOMM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and 2016,
the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2018 and each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively
referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at March 18, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018 and each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring loss from operations that raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required
to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are
required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of
the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Chen & Fan Accountancy Corporation

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.

San Jose, California

April 26, 2018

F-2

AERKOMM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

March 31,

December 31,

2018

2017

2016

Assets

Current Assets

Cash

$

58,237

$

21,504

$

312,173

Inventories

208,674

208,674

209,729

Prepaid expenses

543,852

543,642

11,784

Other receivable - related party

-

46,743

-

Other receivable - others

427,291

412,390

891

Other current assets

1,202

6,591

-

Total Current Assets

1,239,256

1,239,544

534,577

Property and Equipment

Cost

407,501

405,319

128,917

Accumulated depreciation

(119,782

)

(100,592

)

(43,825

)

287,719

304,727

85,092

Construction in progress

3,254,170

3,250,000

3,660,000

Net Property and Equipment

3,541,889

3,554,727

3,745,092

Other Assets

Intangible asset, net

3,753,750

3,877,500

4,372,500

Goodwill

1,450,536

1,450,536

1,105,942

Deposits - related party

2,542

2,396

4,966

Deposits – others

148,839

141,273

801,405

Total Other Assets

5,355,667

5,471,705

6,284,813

Total Assets

$

10,136,812

$

10,265,976

$

10,564,482

Liabilities and Equity

Current Liabilities

Short-term bank loan

$

10,000

$

10,000

$

-

Short-term loan – related parties

325,040

-

-

Accrued expenses

881,214

637,675

71,978

Other payable - related parties

1,299,578

1,082,395

2,955,575

Other payable - others

2,264,637

2,081,787

1,671,269

Total Current Liabilities

4,780,469

3,811,857

4,698,822

Restricted stock deposit liability

14

56

3,342

Total Liabilities

4,780,483

3,811,913

4,702,164

Commitments and Contingency

Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred stock, no par value, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding

The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements.

F-6

AERKOMM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
- Continued

Three Months Ended March 31,

Year Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2017

2016

2015

(Unaudited)

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

Cash
paid during the period for income taxes

$

-

$

-

$

6,239

$

800

$

-

Cash paid during the period for interest

$

113

$

-

$

131

$

-

$

-

Non-cash operating, investing and financing activities:

Construction in progress transferred to other receivable

$

-

$

-

$

410,000

$

-

$

-

Restricted stock deposit liability transferred to common stock

$

42

$

971

$

3,287

$

4,284

$

6,159

Other payable to related parties transferred to common stock

$

-

$

2,024,000

$

2,027,400

$

-

$

-

Net payment for acquisition of subsidiaries:

Cash

$

-

$

-

$

5,704

$

21,650

$

-

Inventories

-

-

-

1,055

-

Prepaid expenses

-

-

16,500

2,784

-

Other receivable – related party

-

-

210,259

-

Other receivable – others

-

-

-

12,149

-

Property and equipment, net

-

-

5,152

6,642

-

Goodwill

-

-

344,594

1,105,942

-

Other assets

-

-

-

20,959

-

Accrued expenses

-

-

(60,640

)

-

-

Other payable

-

-

(518,219

)

(151,131

)

-

Non-controlling interest

-

-

-

(50

)

-

Total payment for acquisition of subsidiaries

-

-

3,350

1,020,000

-

Transferred from prepaid investment

-

-

-

(700,000

)

-

Net payment for acquisition of subsidiaries

$

-

$

-

$

3,350

$

320,000

$

-

The accompanying notes are an integral part
of the consolidated financial statements.

F-7

AERKOMM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015

and Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 (Audited)
and 2017 (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - Organization

Aerkomm Inc. (formerly Maple
Tree Kids Inc.) (“Aerkomm”) was incorporated on August 14, 2013 in the State of Nevada. Aerkomm was a retail distribution
company selling all of its products over the internet in the United States, operating in the infant and toddler products business
market.

On December 28, 2016, Aircom
Pacific Inc. (“Aircom”) purchased 700,000 shares of Aerkomm’s common stock, representing approximately 86.3%
of Aerkomm’s issued and outstanding common stock as of the closing date of purchase. As a result of the transaction, Aircom
became the controlling shareholder of Aerkomm.

On February 13, 2017, Aerkomm
entered into a share exchange agreement (“Exchange Agreement”) with Aircom and its shareholders, pursuant to which
Aerkomm acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Aircom in exchange for approximately 99.7% of the issued and
outstanding capital stock of Aerkomm (or 87.81% on a fully-diluted basis). As a result of the share exchange, Aircom became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Aerkomm, and the former shareholders of Aircom became the holders of approximately 99.7% of Aerkomm’s issued
and outstanding capital stock.

Aircom was incorporated on September
29, 2014 under the laws of the State of California.

On December 31, 2014, Aircom
acquired a newly incorporated subsidiary, Aircom Pacific Ltd. (“Aircom Seychelles”), a corporation formed under the
laws of the Republic of Seychelles. Aircom Seychelles was formed to facilitate Aircom’s global corporate structure for both
business operations and tax planning. Presently, Aircom Seychelles has no operations. Aircom is working with corporate and tax
advisers in finalizing its global corporate structure and has not yet concluded its final plan.

On October 17, 2016, Aircom acquired
a wholly owned subsidiary, Aircom Pacific Inc. Limited (“Aircom HK”), a corporation formed under the laws of Hong Kong.
The purpose of Aircom HK is to conduct Aircom’s business and operations in Hong Kong and China. Presently, its primary function
is business development, both with respect to airlines as well as content providers and advertisement partners based in Hong Kong
and China. Aircom HK is also actively seeking strategic partnerships whom Aircom may leverage in order to provide more and better
services to its customers. Aircom also plans to provide local supports to Hong Kong-based airlines via Aircom HK and teleports
located in the Hong Kong and China regions.

On December 15, 2016, Aircom
acquired a wholly owned subsidiary, Aircom Japan, Inc. (“Aircom Japan”), a corporation formed under the laws of Japan.
The purpose of Aircom Japan is to conduct business development and operations located within Japan. Aircom Japan is in the process
of applying for, and will be the holder of, Satellite Communication Blanket License in Japan, which is necessary for Aircom to
provide services within Japan. Aircom Japan will also provide local supports to airlines operating within the territory of Japan.

Aircom Telecom LLC (“Aircom
Taiwan”), which became a wholly owned subsidiary of Aircom in December 2017, was organized under the laws of Taiwan on June
29, 2016. During 2017, Aircom advanced a total of $460,000 to Aircom Taiwan, which was not affiliated with Aircom during that time,
for working capital, as part of a planned $1,500,000 aggregate equity investment (the “Equity Investment”) in Aircom
Taiwan. Before Aircom Taiwan was allowed to issue equity to Aircom, a foreign investor, the Equity Investment must be approved
by the Investment Review Committee of the Ministry of Economic affairs of Taiwan (the “Committee”). Aircom entered
into an Equity Pre-Subscription Agreement with Aircom Taiwan on August 13, 2017 to memorialize the terms of the Equity Investment.
On December 19, 2017, the Committee approved Aircom’s initial Equity Investment (valued as of that date at NT$15,150,000,
or approximately US$500,000) and the purchase of the founding owner’s total equity of NT$100,000 (approximately US$3,350).
As a result, Aircom Taiwan became a wholly owned subsidiary of Aircom.

Aircom Taiwan is responsible
for Aircom’s business development efforts and general operations within Taiwan. We are currently planning to locate
the site of our first ground station in Taiwan and we expect that if we raise sufficient funds to move forward with this project
(although that cannot be guaranteed), Aircom Taiwan will play a significant role in building and operating that ground station.

Aircom and its subsidiaries are
full service providers of in-flight entertainment and connectivity solutions with their initial market in the Asian Pacific region.

Aerkomm and its subsidiaries
(“the Company”) have not generated significant revenues, excluding non-recurring revenues from affiliates in 2015,
and will incur additional expenses as a result of being a public reporting company. If the Company is unable to obtain additional
working capital, the Company’s business may fail. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2018, the Company incurred a
comprehensive loss of $1,456,249 and had working capital deficiency of $3,541,213 as of March 31, 2018, which raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Currently, the Company has taken measures that management believes will
improve its financial position by financing activities, short-term borrowings and equity contributions.

F-8

AERKOMM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- Continued

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015

and Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 (Audited)
and 2017 (Unaudited)

NOTE 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Change in Fiscal Year

On March 18, 2018, the Company’s
Board of Directors approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year end from December 31 to March 31. Year-over-year quarterly
financial data continues to be comparative to prior periods as the months that comprise each fiscal quarter in the new fiscal year
are the same as those in the Company’s historical financial statements.

Reverse Acquisition

On February 13, 2017, Aerkomm
completed the reverse acquisition of Aircom pursuant to the Exchange Agreement. As a result of the reverse acquisition, Aircom
became Aerkomm’s wholly-owned subsidiary. For accounting purposes, the share exchange transaction with Aircom was treated
as a reverse acquisition, with Aircom as the acquirer and Aerkomm as the acquired party. Unless the context suggests otherwise,
“the Company” referred to for the periods prior to the consummation of the reverse acquisition is Aircom and its consolidated
subsidiaries.

Principle of Consolidation

Aerkomm consolidates the accounts
of its subsidiaries, Aircom, Aircom Seychelles, Aircom HK, Aircom Japan and Aircom Taiwan. All significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications of Prior
Year Presentation

Certain prior year balance sheet
amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the
reported results of operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially
subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash in banks and accounts receivable. As
of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the total balances of cash in bank were insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and foreign financial institution deposits insurance.

The Company performs ongoing
credit evaluation of its customers and requires no collateral. An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided based on a review
of the collectability of accounts receivable. The Company determines the amount of allowance for doubtful accounts by examining
the historical collection experience as well as its internal credit policies.

The Company conducts extensive
transactions with its related parties. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 was solely from related parties.

Inventories

Inventories are recorded at the
lower of weighted-average cost or net realizable value. The Company assesses the impact of changing technology on its inventory
on hand and writes off inventories that are considered obsolete. Estimated losses on scrap and slow-moving items are recognized
in the allowance for losses.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated
at cost less accumulated depreciation. When value impairment is determined, the related assets are stated at the lower of fair
value or book value. Significant additions, renewals and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation is computed by using
the straight-line and double declining method over the following estimated service lives: computer equipment - 3 to 5 years, furniture
and fixtures - 5 years and satellite equipment – 5 years.

Construction costs for on-flight
entertainment equipment not yet in service are recorded under construction in progress.

F-9

AERKOMM INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- Continued

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015

and Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 (Audited)
and 2017 (Unaudited)

NOTE 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies - Continued

Property and Equipment - continued

Upon sale or disposal of property
and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the corresponding accounts, with any gain or loss
credited or charged to income in the period of sale or disposal.

The Company reviews the carrying
amount of property and equipment for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such
assets may not be recoverable. It determined that there was no impairment loss for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018
and 2017 and each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017.

Goodwill and Purchased Intangible
Assets

The Company’s goodwill
represents the amount by which the total purchase price paid exceeded the estimated fair value of net assets acquired from acquisition
of subsidiaries. The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate
that there may be impairment.

Purchased intangible assets with
finite life are amortized on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of respective assets. Purchased intangible
assets with indefinite life are eval