Monsanto Case Analysis

Publisher's Summary

This case analysis is about a company called Monsanto and the belief that their use of genetically modified goods is, allegedly, doing more harm than good. Monsanto has responded to opposition by indicating that newly developed, genetically modified food is the only way to combat world hunger. The company believes that this opposition to genetically modified food will soon pass. This essay serves as a great example of how to perform a case study; it also tackles myths and business practices surrounding Monsanto. I hold an associate's degree in business management and a bachelor's degree in business administration, having graduated cum laude.

Sorry for the Short Delay

Unfortunately, that depends on our systems, and they're keeping it to themselves. It could take a few minutes, but there's a chance it will be longer. We recommend that you check back with us in a few hours, when your title should be available for download in My Library. We appreciate your patience, and we apologize for the inconvenience.

Please contact customer service if the problem persists.
(888) 283-5051

Enter Promo Code

See More Like This

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful

10 min opinion without substance

What disappointed you about Monsanto Case Analysis?

It has no objective data. It has no novel idea. In a nutshell Monsanto is a "good" "ethical" company that failed to make better advertisement of its awesome goofs I mean goods. Please give me my money back!

What could Trevor Clinger have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?

Little. He is already firmly for Monsanto so there is no objectivity.

Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Trevor Clinger?

No comment

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Monsanto Case Analysis?

This book should not be for sale.

Any additional comments?

Monsanto rules our food and I am surprised that the only book available is this weak audio book. In paper you have Marie Monique Robin, "The World According to Monsanto" for example. Is this lack of audio titles by design?

Somewhat monotonous, and failure to clearly recite the history of atrocities that Monsanto deemed "safe".

Would you ever listen to anything by Trevor Clinger again?

possibly

Would you be willing to try another one of Trevor Clinger’s performances?

depends on the subject matter

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Monsanto Case Analysis?

Candidly, I would have much preferred a decade by decade recital of Monsanto products that were anything, but safe. Then a more scientific approach to discussing GMO's and then a discussion about the lawsuits against farmer's who had there crops "contaminated" by Monsanto seeds (thereby losing their "organic crop" designation) and then being sued by Monsanto just because the seeds desalinated to their farms from nearby farms.