Consociational Democracy vs Nepotism Information

The practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.

1.1 Oxford Dictionary

Consociational Democracy is a form of government involving guaranteed group representation, and is often suggested for managing conflict in deeply divided societies.

The practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.

1.2 Cambridge Dictionary

A type of government involving groups, often suggested for managing conflict in deeply divided societies.

The act of using your power or influence to get good jobs or unfair advantages for members of your own family.

1.3 Merriam-Webster Dictionary

A government type which is an association in fellowship or alliance.

The unfair practice by a powerful person of giving jobs and other favors to relatives.

1.4 Etymology

1.4.1 Word Origin Language Text

the word consociation comes from the words con which means together and sociare which means to associate in Latin. The word democracy has a Greek origin.

ND

1.4.2 Latin root Text

ND

ND

1.4.3 Greek root Text

ND

ND

1.4.4 Word Origin Language(s)

Greek, Latin

Italian

1.4.5 Latin Root

consociare - consociatio

Not Available

1.4.6 Greek Root

dēmokratia

Not Applicable

1.4.7 Other

Not Applicable

Nipote(Italian)

1.4.8 Word Origin Period

19th century AD

17th century AD

1.5 Similar Government Types

2 Characteristics

2.1 Government Class

Democracy

Pejorative

2.1.1 Government Class Text

ND

ND

2.2 Advantages

No single person rule, Power and decision making localized, Stability

Continuity, Decisions made quickly

2.2.1 AdvantagesText

This form of government is comparatively more stable. Power is shared. There is very less violence and there is multiple balance of power.

ND

2.3 Disadvantages

External threats, Segment isolation

Discrimination, No individual freedom, Few people in power, Greed, Ignoring social responsibilities, Inequality, No long term goals, People with selfish motives

2.3.1 DisadvantagesText

There are chances of external threats happening. Also, a segment of people may be isolated.

ND

2.4 Structure

2.4.1 Majority Rule

✔✘

95%Types of Democracy Governments have it !

✔✘

46%AD Era Governments have it !

2.4.2 Power Resides in

Power sharing arrangements

Few deceitful individuals

2.4.3 Voting

✔✘

AllTypes of Democracy Governments have it !

✔✘

46%AD Era Governments have it !

2.4.4 Succession

Elective

Neither Heritance nor Elective

2.4.5 Parliament

Present

Not Available

2.4.6 Constitution

Present

Absent

2.4.7 Legislature Size

Large

Small

2.4.8 Political Stability

Stable

Unstable

2.4.9 Economic Stability

Stable

Unstable

2.5 Based on Religion

✔✘

5%Types of Democracy Governments have it !

✔✘

4%AD Era Governments have it !

2.5.1 Freedom of Religion

✔✘

AllTypes of Democracy Governments have it !

✔✘

88%AD Era Governments have it !

3 Countries

3.1 Asian

Lebanon

Combodia, Cuba, Pakistan, Singapore, Sri Lanka

3.2 European

Belgium, Cyprus, Netherlands, Switzerland

NA, Romania

3.3 African

Not present

NA

3.4 North American

Not present

NA

3.5 South American

Not present

NA

3.6 Others

New Zealand

NA

3.7 Ancient Regime

3.7.1 Asia

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.2 Europe

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.3 Africa

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.4 North America

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.5 South America

Not Available

Not Available

3.7.6 Other

Not Available

Not Available

4 History

A modern day 19th century type of government

The term originated with the assignment of nephews to cardinal positions by Catholic popes and bishops.The nephews were usually their illegitimate offspring, It's a way for church clergy to both own property and to retain power in their families.

4.1 Origin

4.1.1 Place of Origin

Europe

Italy

4.1.2 Period of Origin

19th century AD

17th century AD

4.1.3 Origin Era

A.D.

A.D.

4.1.4 Place of origin Text

Netherlands

ND

4.1.5 Period of Origin Text

ND

ND

4.2 Famous Quotes

NA

NEPOTISM, n. Appointing your grandmother to office for the good of the party.-Ambrose Bierce

4.3 Famous Leaders

Brendan O'Leary, John McGarry

Not Available

4.4 Modern

4.4.1 Early Modern

This type of democracy emerged in the 19th. It was not prevalant in the early modern period.

NA

4.4.2 18th and 19th Century

The Netherlands, as a consociational state, was between 1857 and 1967 divided into four non territorial pillars, although until 1917 there was aplurality ('first past the post') electoral system rather than a consociational one.

NA

4.4.3 20th and 21st Century

The Dayton Agreement that ended the 1992–1995 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is described as a "classic example of consociational settlement" by Sumantra Bose[22] and "an ideal-typical consociational democracy" by Roberto Belloni

NA

Compare Consociational Democracy and Nepotism Information

When you compare Consociational Democracy and Nepotism information, you will observe that no two types of governments are going to be exactly same. Either they have completely different ideologies or they are derived from one another. When a nation adopts a type of government, all the social, economic and political situations prevalent in that nation are taken into consideration. You can know the basis of these government forms if you study the Consociational Democracy Definition and Nepotism Definition.

Consociational Democracy and Nepotism

The basic differentiating factor between Consociational Democracy and Nepotism, is their definition. Consociational Democracy can be defined as A state with internal divisions (ethnic, religious or linguistic) and Nepotism can be defined as The practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.. The interpretion of any word may vary in different dictionaries. Similarly, the meaning of Consociational Democracy and Nepotism varies in different dictionaries. Some of the most notable dictionary meanings are given below:

Consociational Democracy:Oxford Dictionary- Consociational Democracy is a form of government involving guaranteed group representation, and is often suggested for managing conflict in deeply divided societies.Cambridge Dictionary- A type of government involving groups, often suggested for managing conflict in deeply divided societies.Merriam-Webster Dictionary- A government type which is an association in fellowship or alliance.

Nepotism:Oxford Dictionary- Consociational Democracy is a form of government involving guaranteed group representation, and is often suggested for managing conflict in deeply divided societies.Cambridge Dictionary- A type of government involving groups, often suggested for managing conflict in deeply divided societies.Merriam-Webster Dictionary- A government type which is an association in fellowship or alliance.

Compare Consociational Democracy vs Nepotism Characteristics

When you compare Consociational Democracy vs Nepotism characteristics, what you are actually comparing are their merits and demerits.The advantages of Consociational Democracy are No single person rule, Power and decision making localized, Stability. Whereas, advantages of Nepotism are Continuity, Decisions made quickly. As a coin has both sides, similarly, these governments also have demerits. The disadvantages of Consociational Democracy are External threats, Segment isolation and the disadvantages of Nepotism are Discrimination, No individual freedom, Few people in power, Greed, No long term goals, People with selfish motives, Ignoring social responsibilities, Inequality. A complete study of Consociational Democracy vs Nepotism Characteristics will give you a profound knowledge about these types of governments and their various attributes.

Comparing Consociational Democracy vs Nepotism History

It is said that if you really want to understand a person, you should start from his roots. Same is true for any type of government. Comparing Consociational Democracy vs Nepotism history will give you all the information about their roots. Consociational Democracy is A modern day 19th century type of government which was originated in Europe. Whereas, Nepotism is The term originated with the assignment of nephews to cardinal positions by Catholic popes and bishops.The nephews were usually their illegitimate offspring, It's a way for church clergy to both own property and to retain power in their families. that originated in Italy. Once a government type is established, we need people who promote or advocate the qualities and advantages. Some of the famous leaders of Consociational Democracy are Brendan O'Leary, John McGarry. Whereas, some of the supporters of Nepotism are Leaders of government.

When we study about Consociational Democracy vs Nepotism history, it becomes clear that these government forms have undergone a lot of changes since their origin. Evolution of these governments over time can be classified as given below:

Consociational Democracy:Early Modern- This type of democracy emerged in the 19th. It was not prevalant in the early modern period.18th and 19th Century- The Netherlands, as a consociational state, was between 1857 and 1967 divided into four non territorial pillars, although until 1917 there was aplurality ('first past the post') electoral system rather than a consociational one.20th and 21st Century- The Dayton Agreement that ended the 1992–1995 war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is described as a "classic example of consociational settlement" by Sumantra Bose[22] and "an ideal-typical consociational democracy" by Roberto Belloni