Hi Hassan,
In the 26 Aug telecon we only decided to create a page for the *abridged* syntax.
Cf. ACTION: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/569
* The APS is not normative but just a compact notation,
which should become dialect-independent,
as needed, e.g., for UCR and the test cases.
* The APS is an optional addition only.
* The APS evolution can thus follow a different time-line,
so should be decoupled from the evolution of the other documents.
The PS, on the other hand, is an official part of documents such as BLD (in LC),
FLD, and Core. Each of these documents should stay independent from APS.
Best,
Harold
________________________________
From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hassan Ait-Kaci
Sent: September 1, 2008 9:13 AM
To: Adrian Paschke; public-rif-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for creating this page. Why not also include *all* PS syntactic rules
and conventions, whether abridged or not, explicitly including all the rules
imported from other W3C WG's documents (as used by Axel's EBNF rules for the
APS)? It'd be nice not to have to go back and forth between 4 or 5 documents
in order to have the whole picture.
Thank you.
-hak
--
Hassan AÃ¯t-Kaci * ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D
http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaci
-----Original Message-----
From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org on behalf of Adrian Paschke
Sent: Mon 9/1/2008 11:01 AM
To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Subject: [RIF-Abridge PS] ACTION-569
I have created a page to document the abridged presentation syntax
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/APS
- Adrian