i think cap is too high. i just drafted a team and i believe most teams will be cookie cutter and include the same players. i would lift the d rating limit on forwards to allow for more variety. maybe increase the d rating for d men to allow for more variety as well; otherwise, all teams will have the same d men. as it is now, most teams will have the same goalies.

The idea is to join and have fun like I try and do in your theme leagues....... not to critique other owners ideas......happens way to much in here....if you don't like the theme then do not join................. theme rules stay as they are. Thank you

The minimum PIM totals, -when divided into an average
82-game schedule, gives 'searchers' a ''PIM's/PerGame''
average of 1.22 (rounded-off)... However, based on 100
PIM's, a scrub-skater with 20 games would obviously be
in the 'box' for 5 (or more) minutes, -per game...

Left a post (as well) in your league forum, -curious as to
the 1.22 PIM thresh-hold, per game... There are many D
men from the late teen's & early 20's that played under a
20 & 22 & 24 game schedule...

halen is right. i think the reason owners chime in is because they want to join more leagues, but don't want to join leagues in which every team is the same. that's why a lot of leagues don't fill because it's the same players over and over again.

that's all. not telling you how to run a league. just want to see these fill up more.

Not offended by any means guys ....I just gave my opinion in a way that I got my message across...... I am as easy going as they come boyz. We are struggling to find new owners to play.....the theme leagues are dwindling and so are the numbers. Come on in and have fun!!!

100 PIM or more is not based on game ratios...... Players on Defense need to have 100 PIM or more to play including D-man scrubs.