There are no contemporary account of Jesus reference in any of the gospels or other secondary accounts of Jesus.

There are 5 contemporary accounts of Alexander referenced in the secondary accounts, they are Alexander's campaign historian Callisthenes; Alexander's generals Ptolemy and Nearchus; Aristobulus, a junior officer on the campaigns; and Onesicritus, Alexander's chief helmsman.

And SO? Of course theres morons like you that degrade EVERYTHING biblical because of their atheist agenda... JUST LIKE you say theres no documentation for Jesus, yet by 1100 AD He outnumbers Alexander 20,000 to 3 manuscripts...

I'll have to remember 9 out of 10 morons that think theyre experts recommend Wikipedia.

(06-11-2014 10:15 AM)Wolfbitn Wrote: Too bad for you silent readers are laughing their asses off at you

No one can know what silent readers are thinking, and that includes you. But one thing is likely - when they read you repeatedly claiming that you do know what their reactions are, they have a clear indication that you're just making it all up. Way to flush your own credibility down the toilet.

(06-11-2014 10:18 AM)wazzel Wrote: There are no contemporary account of Jesus reference in any of the gospels or other secondary accounts of Jesus.

There are 5 contemporary accounts of Alexander referenced in the secondary accounts, they are Alexander's campaign historian Callisthenes; Alexander's generals Ptolemy and Nearchus; Aristobulus, a junior officer on the campaigns; and Onesicritus, Alexander's chief helmsman.

Looks like Jesus 0 - Alexander 5

You don't have ONE manuscript cotemporary to Alexander... mO-ron

The EARLIEST EXISTING manuscript for alexander is 10th century, like Iv told you though 50 pages now ...and by that time there were thousands for Jesus

and by 1100 AD Alexander had 3 and Jesus had 12.000

Read it and weep pup... you got NOTHING contemporary to alexander whatsoever, not even close...

(06-11-2014 10:15 AM)Wolfbitn Wrote: Too bad for you silent readers are laughing their asses off at you

No one can know what silent readers are thinking, and that includes you. But one thing is likely - when they read you repeatedly claiming that you do know what their reactions are, they have a clear indication that you're just making it all up. Way to flush your own credibility down the toilet.

. In Neusner, Jacob. World Religions in America: An Introduction. Westminster John Knox Press.
Doukhan, Jacques (2000). Secrets of Daniel: wisdom and dreams of a Jewish prince in exile

. Review and Herald Pub Assoc.
Dunn, James D.G. (2002). "The Danilic Son of Man in the New Testament"

. In Collins, John J.; Flint, Peter W.; VanEpps, Cameron. The Book of Daniel: Composition and Reception. BRILL.
Grabbe, Lester L. (2010). An Introduction to Second Temple Judaism: History and Religion of the Jews in the Time of Nehemiah, the Maccabees, Hillel, and Jesus

. Continuum.
Grabbe, Lester L. (2002a). Judaic Religion in the Second Temple Period: Belief and Practice from the Exile to Yavneh

. Routledge.
Grabbe, Lester L. (2002b). "A Dan(iel) For All Seasons"

. In Collins, John J.; Flint, Peter W.; VanEpps, Cameron. The Book of Daniel: Composition and Reception. BRILL.

(06-11-2014 10:20 AM)Impulse Wrote: No one can know what silent readers are thinking, and that includes you. But one thing is likely - when they read you repeatedly claiming that you do know what their reactions are, they have a clear indication that you're just making it all up. Way to flush your own credibility down the toilet.

I said they were silent READERS... not talking to YOU

Yes, you did, it's what I said, and now they all see this nonsensical response from you too. Keep it up.