I am working on documenting a story about two individuals
who have been implanted with brain implants against their will that monitors
their thoughts and injects the voices of two people into their heads.
Believe me, I wondered whether this technology existed when I first heard about
it. But I have done four months of intensive research on this, and have
copies of the x-rays from one of the individuals. Experts in the field
confirm that this technology does exist, and both of these individuals are
extraordinarily credible, but are afraid because the motivation behind this is
to lock them up as being insane, because they are civil liberties activists.

Calling all x-ray technicians, or people who have x-rays of
their own brains, please look at the frontal lobe (just under the forehead) at
a black object, about 3 mm by 7 mm, and call me at 740-753-3888 or email chadkister@gmail.com
if you notice anything different than what you would expect. Here are two
copies of the x-rays, one showing the full brain, one zoomed in to the frontal
lobe, where their appears to be a brain implant.

Imagine a world where one’s thoughts are monitored, and police could
broadcast voices and visions into ones brain.What if such devices were to be surreptitiously placed into people’s
brain’s against their will?What
power would that grant those who had such information, which could be broadcast
wirelessly through satellites?

Every action, thought and everything one looked at could suddenly become
recorded and used to extort a lifelong of slavery and obedience to the power
doing the monitoring, allowing for a Hitler-like dominance of a country, leading
to World War III.The latest in
nanotechnology science shows that such technology has arrived. More troubling,
such devices have been used in two
Ohio
citizens against their will, according to two sources.

“I will never forget it,” said Al Smith, owner of Spy
Depot in suburban
Columbus
,
Ohio
about a time when a woman came in, asking for him to detect wireless
frequencies in her head.He said
that his device went wild, and that he detected frequencies with a second
wireless device, a spectrum analyzer.

She brought in x-rays of her head, and he downloaded them onto his
computer.

“I can read those things,” he said, referring to x-rays.“I spotted it right away.”

He said later that it was about an inch long and a quarter
inch in diameter. She had recently
been in a hospital. He said about two weeks later, two men came in, asking for
him to give an affidavit about the woman. He would not give any information,
because she was a client.

Some time later, she came in with the same two men, and asked for him to
write up an affidavit. He wrote and signed an affidavit confirming that he had
detected a wireless frequency coming from her head. “They say in ten years
everyone will have one,” he warned.

In a separate case, an anonymous source, whom the author knows personally
is very credible, reported that he had been implanted with a microchip that
monitored and influenced his thoughts, and had people speaking into his brain.

He reported that two people, a male and a female were talking in his
head, hypnotizing him and putting images into his head.He said that they were responding to his thoughts, what he was doing and
what he was seeing as well.He said
that they were trying to make him go crazy, saying one thing, then saying the
opposite.

The source wanted to remain anonymous, because he said their goal was to
try to declare him mentally unfit to stand trial when he uncovered that they had
put a nanotechnology transmitter into his brain. He said that they were
hypnotizing him to call law enforcement, to turn himself in for things that they
falsely accused him of, and woke him up through the night.

Nanotechnology has been trucking ahead with little oversight, with well
documented studies confirming that the technology is there to see what people
see, as well as monitor the brain.In
2004, the Food and Drug Administration approved the implantation of microchips
into the brains of Alzheimer’s patients to help them deal with the loss of
memory.

What if such devices could be made extraordinarily small, utilizing
nanotechnology and carbon fibers, such as to be near undetectable?What if they used very high frequencies, about 600 megahertz, such as to
be undetectable by most private investigators?

Such technology was called uberveillance by Michael G. Michael, from the
University
of
Wollongong
’s
School
of
Information Systems
technology (ninemsn, March 20, 2009). Such technology could record what a
person saw, the person’s movements, and even their thoughts, Dr. Michael said.

One nightclub in
Spain
began implanting its patrons with Verichip microchips, about the size of a
grain of rice, so that they could purchase drinks without the need to bring cash
or a credit card, CNN reported June 9, 2004.The nightclub could just scan the chip, which can be implanted for about
$150, and be used as a debit or credit card.

VeriChip began implanting people in
Mexico
with a tracking microchip in 2003, which can beused to contain medical information, and to track a person within 5
miles, according to the Associated Press, July 17, 2003. The company said that
they were working on a system to use satellite technology that could track
people who were kidnapped.Of course
this could also be used for more nefarious purposes.

If this is what private companies are manufacturing, what is our
government doing with the billions of dollars already spent on nanotechnology?
We need greater transparency to see just what the Defense Department and the
Department of Homeland Security have developed with billions of dollars having
gone into nanotechnology.We must
ensure that any devices created can be detectable, and is never implanted into
someone without ones consent.

With two credible reports in
Ohio
showing that people have been microchipped against their will, Congress needs
to begin investigating this issue.What
would it be like to have someone be able to see as one goes to the bathroom,
changes clothes or had sexual intercourse, as the anonymous
Ohio
source said is happening to him|?What
if they continued to speak during such times, reminding you that they are
watching?

What would happen to a person’s dignity and self-worth if everything
one thinks about, or was hypnotized to think or say, was monitored and being
used against them?What if memories
of movies, video games and television programs could be used against someone as
“proof” they did something that they did not? What would it do to someone to
have an endless probe, 24-7 with no way to stop it?

Two FBI workers were caught spying on teenage girls as they tried on prom
gowns for 90 minutes in Morgantown, West Virginia, reported the Associate Press
on April 21, 2009.Imagine if big
brother could watch anything someone looked at, such as intimate moments with a
loved one, or time spent with ones children.What if clips of such moments could be put on the internet, made to look
like one had a hidden videocamera, when in fact the camera was in a microchip
implanted in that person’s brain? While this sounds like science fiction, the
fact is the technology is here, but the regulation is not.

In a study published in the journal Nature in 2002, scientists rigged up
five rats with miniature videocameras and devices that stimulated portions of
the rodent brains to use them to move left or right, getting video of everything
that they looked at.

In the 1960s,
Tulane
University
implanted electrodes into people.BrainGate
has a product, first tried in Matt Nagle in 2004 that detects brainwaves and
turns them into motorized action.This
is used by paraplegics to operate motorized wheelchairs, and other devices.

In 1999, BBC reported that researchers had implanted a microchip into a
cat that detected what the cat was seeing, and broadcast that into a computer,
using the output of 177 brain cells.Researchers
in
Hiroshima
,
Japan
are developing miniature cameras.

Furthermore, the devices themselves would greatly contribute to the
susceptibility of cancer, both through the microchips themselves, and the need
for wireless communication coming from the most sensitive part of the body to
such electromagnetic fields.A
series of scientific studies from 1996 to 2006 found that the rate of cancer was
between 1% and 10%, for mice and rats implanted with the microchip transponders
were later diagnosed with sarcomas, fibrosarcomas and other invasive cancers
surrounding or attached to the nanotechnology devices, according to a study
published by S. Le Calvez et. Al. in Experimental and Toxicological Pathology in
2006.

“From a medical standpoint, obviously you worry about radiation with
any electronic device,” said Dr. Arun Patel, a general physician in
Los Angeles
(CNN, 2004).

With the critical need of the Fourth Estate: the media, to watchdog
government, and uncover violations of liberties and abuses by the government,
such devices could preempt efforts to uncover corruption in government, planned
overthrows of the democratic process, and the start of World War III.

With the horrific abuses of civil liberties granted by the Patriot Act,
the Department of Homeland Security is reportedly working on implanting people
with microchips against their will.Though
in gross violation of the Constitution, the secrecy granted by the Patriot Act
could be used to try to keep clandestine uses of such technology hidden.With absolute power granted by such secrecy, the very survival of the
union – and our planet – is at stake.

Such devices could be put in the president while he slept, or in top
military commanders.Access codes to
nuclear weapons, and weapons caches could be gained through the abuse of such
technology, as a means of causing World War III.Clearly we need more oversight into exactly what the Defense Department
and others are doing with this technology.