Friday, May 31, 2013

There’s a difference in the two shots that make up today’s image.One is right out of the camera and the other is a five shot HDR image.The one out of the camera is a RAW image with nothing (nothing) done to it.The other, like I said, is a fully developed HDR image.Can you see the difference?Sure.With a little work, can I make the OOC (out of Camera) shot look just like the HDR image?Yep!A couple of slider moves in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Beta (or LR 4 or LR3) and you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between the two.Does the OOC RAW image have some special lighting applied that the HDR image doesn’t have?Nope.The RAW shot is one of the brackets used to make the HDR image, so the lighting is exactly the same.The images are of a steam locomotive at Steamtown in Scranton Pennsylvania.It’s on the shadow side, on a bright sunny afternoon.So where’d the light come from?To find out, hit the “Read More”.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Does he look familiar?Do you know any of his work?Probably
not.His name is Bob Devine and he died
over the weekend.Today’s image is from
somewhere near 1974-1975.The young boy
with him is our oldest son, who would have been 43 this year.The shot is typical Bob.He was a teacher to anyone he’d go shooting
with.It didn’t matter if he was with
peers, kids, interested “newbies” or just friends.The last time I saw Bob was last year at a
local camera club.He just happened to
stop down and gave the club’s president some medals the club had won back in
the 60’s and 70’s.I didn’t recognize
him and asked him for his name.He said “I’m
Bob Devine”.I replied “I’ve got your
lights”.The message didn’t connect and
he couldn’t figure out what I was talking about.He said “what?”.I again told him I had his lights.His retort was “who the hell are you?”I told him I was Tom Peterson.He cracked a smile and said if I didn’t get
the lights back to him pretty soon, he wouldn’t loan them to me again.I borrowed them back in the 70’s, so I’d
guess him hadn’t missed them that much.They were pretty much the thing back in the 70’s.Hot lights with daylight balanced tungsten
bulbs and 10” reflectors.That’s what
passed for “studio lights” at the time. As an aside, I called my wife over. Bob took one look at her and said "Doris, why haven't you aged at all?" The guy was smooth.

We used to travel together to shoot and judge camera club
competitions.The two of us and our “third
amigo” (Ernie Stonebraker [real name]) would go off for the weekend and blow a
boat load of film.One trip to Maine,
between the three of us, we had something like 120 36 exposure rolls of
film.Typically it was either slide film
or Tri X B&W film.We used to scare
the hell out of camera clubs when we’d walk in to judge a competition.We’d ask what the scoring range they used was
and then tell them we would be using the entire range.Back in the 70’s the range was usually three
through nine.

Bob mentioned, when pushed, that he had driven stock cars “back
in the day”.I read his obit. today and
found out he was the USAR champion a couple times.The stuff you never knew.

Well, he was a buddy.As far as I’m concerned, you don’t have to see someone on a weekly basis
to be a friend.People I call friends
come dear to me.I have all sorts of acquaintances,
but the number I call friends are very few.Bob was one of the best.Peace to
you my friend.

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

It’s new, it’s on sale (until 5/30/2013), the demos look
good, but is it all it’s cracked up to be?Today’s image is of one of the twenty-two named waterfalls in Ricketts
Glen State Park in Pennsylvania.We went
there over the Memorial Day weekend specifically to shoot some of the
falls.As you may have guessed from the
color of the reflections in the water, today’s image isn’t from that trip.The falls in today’s image is probably as
close to the road as you can find.When
we first “discovered” Ricketts Glen we had the place to ourselves.Over this past weekend, we didn’t.The parking lot for this falls was full,
full, full.The parking place for the
next set was also chock-a-block full of cars, vans, SVUs, pickup trucks and
campers.We drove to what we thought
were the undiscovered gems that were basically pull-offs on the side of the
road, that gave access to a couple of interesting spots.Nope, jammed packed.That’s why I pulled up a shot from a fall
trip we took in 2011.Had to try
something to test Topaz Labs’ Clarity.To see what I found, hit the “Read More”.

Friday, May 17, 2013

A friend was checking out a few of my recent images and
asked how the backgrounds were made.Just flip down through the last couple of posts (you might have to dig
down four or five) to see what he was looking at.I explained that the backgrounds came from
Brushes made from shots of clouds I had taken.To get the effect you see in the images, cloud brushes are just about
the ideal thing to use.Clouds aren’t
solid.Clouds have texture.Clouds are readily available.If there aren’t any today, look out the
window tomorrow.Sooner or later you
find some interesting clouds.I keep Folders
of clouds.I Keyword every cloud image
so I can pull them up quickly in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (any version).I pop them into scenes that have bald skies
and I use them to make Brushes for creative backgrounds.Clouds are useful little suckers.Today’s (main) image is a Brush I made this
morning to be able to capture the steps to make a cloud Brush.To follow along, hit the “Read More”.Read more!

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Based on the title you may think this post will be a rant
about Kelby Media, Photoshop TV, Kelby Training, and The Grid and their support
of Adobe Photoshop CC (PSCC).It’s
not.They make a lot of good points
about who will benefit from PSCC, who might want to think twice about it and who
should probably stay away.No, it’s
about the fact that even the esteemed folks working with Kelby are beginning to
show their age as far as Photoshop goes.One thing that bugs me is how they’re missing the point on Smart
Objects.They say ‘oh, I open all my
images in PS as Smart Objects’.They’ll
do a couple things and then say that their next step is to use the antiquated
CTRL/ALT(OPT)/SHIFT/E salute to put a composite on the top of the stack before
going on to other steps.Doing the
C/A/S/E thing breaks the link between the Smart Object and the original RAW
image.I don’t understand why they think
that’s the way they should go.Drives me
nuts.To find out how it makes me crazy,
hit the “Read More”.Read more!

Monday, May 13, 2013

Today’s image is more of a “my thoughts” type of thing,
rather than some sort of wonder art.It
show how I approach an image in the develop process.You only see one “markup” on the left.There were more as the image was “developed”.Why?How? The “why” is easy.It’s to create a plan for the image and give
a set of “attack” plans.The “how” is
equally easy.Even though all the work
of the image was done using Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Beta (LR5B), the
planning is done with Adobe Photoshop CS6 (any version of PSCS or PSE could have
been used).The only reason for using an
application with a Layers function is to be able to put separate thoughts on
separate Layers.Each Layer was “assigned”
a different color for its Pencil Tool (B).The Pencil function in PS or PSE is found grouped with the Brush Tool
(B).Using separate Layers lets each set
of thoughts stand only or they can be seen as a whole (as in the markup).To check out the sequence of thoughts, hit
the “Read More”.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Today’s image is another that’s just eye candy.I might offer a paragraph at the end, but the
news out there about Adobe Photoshop CC is far more important.So, Adobe’s going subscription for either the
whole shebang (all [almost all] Adobe applications) for $49.95 per month or
$19.95 on a per application basis.I use
Adobe Photoshop CS6 and (at the moment) Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Beta.I’ve kept up with all the updates since Adobe
Photoshop 7.I don’t use any of the
other Adobe applications.No In Design,
no Illustrator, no Premier, Muse, etc.I
understand that LR will continue to be a consumer product, not subscription (at
this time).It’s come down to being
available for $79.00 at most outlets in the USA.Version updates (CS3 to CS4, CS4 to CS5, etc)
have been about every 18 to 24 months and have cost $199.00 for each version. That works out to somewhere between $8.00 and
$11.00 per month.Adobe has a one year “special
offer” for those who are up to date (using CS6) for $10.00.That works out right in the ballpark of what
we’ve been paying for the past ten years or so.If they make that a permanent subscription price for plain old PS (not
an Extended Version), I’d sign up today and happily pay by the month.I’ve never used 3D, I don’t believe I need
3D.If I had it available to me I might
find it to be a wonderful thing, but I don’t think so.Hopefully Adobe will figure out a slightly
more tiered pricing structure during this first year.I do have a couple thoughts on what I “might”
do if I would have to go up to $19.95 a month for PS CC only.Hit the “Read more” to find out what my
thoughts are.Read more!

About the Kayview Gallery

Honored to be featured on:

.

Interesting Blog or Site of the Day

Subscribe To

Prints Available

If you're looking through the blog and you see a shot that catches your fancy, it's probably for sale as a limited addition, signed and numbered print.

All prints are large format, starting at 16 x 20 and going up. Leave a note with your email address and we can discuss which prints are available, which are sold out and those that will never be available.