Em 3/7/20 9:34 AM, Andreas Färber escreveu:> Hi Matheus,> > Am 07.03.20 um 01:24 schrieb Matheus Castello:>> The Caninos Loucos Program develops Single Board Computers with an open>> structure. The Program wants to form a community of developers to use>> the IoT technology and disseminate the learning of embedded systems in> > I would suggest "IoT technologies" without "the".>

> Alphabetical order: n goes before p.> > I'm confused by the description... Either this Caninos Loucos is an > independent vendor and gets its own prefix, or it's LSI-Tec and uses > something like lsi-tec,caninosloucos-foo. Please clarify commit message > and/or description line, at least by inserting something like "program > by", "brand by" or the like rather than just concatenating names. Maybe > compare UDOO by SECO. Is caninos,foo unique enough or should it be > caninosloucos,foo? (crazy canines?)>

Yes "Caninos Loucos" means crazy canines (or mad dog) in Portuguese. This is a initiative that have as co-founder the Jon Maddog Hall, because of Jon we have the "maddog", but in Portuguese, on the name of program.

From their website: https://caninosloucos.org/en/program-en/:"It is an initiative of the Technological Integrated Systems Laboratory (LSI-TEC) with the support of Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (Poli-USP) and Jon “Maddog” Hall"

So I think we can put this instead "The boards are designed and manufactured by LSI-TEC NPO." on description.

Let me know what you think about this.

> Note that I usually attempt to CC the organizations I'm assigning a > vendor prefix for. Do you represent them or coordinated with them?>

Thanks for the review and tips. I am adding Edgar Bernardi Righi and Igor Ruschi from Caninos team as CC on this patch series.