6
comments:

Anonymous
said...

I predicted back then-- before a single GOP primary had been held, with Romney trailing for months to almost every GOP competitor from Rick Perry to Herman Cain to Newt-- that Romney would easily rout his competition to win the GOP nomination by a landslide.

It wasn't that hard to predict. Romney never really "trailed" that badly, if at all. He always had a steady plurality of voter support in polls, while every other candidate had a short burst of enthusiasm from the "not-Romney" bloc of GOP voters, which eventually faded when that candidate kept opening their mouth. Romney also had huge advantages in money and organization. Basically he had a machine gun while every other candidate had a pocket knife.

First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient-- common sense

Well that settles it. Who cares if they take scientific surveys and record and aggregate the responses of those survey? Why bother with all that actual data when you can just turn to "common sense", which as we know has never, ever, ever been wrong about anything.

Overwhelming the economy with spending would fix the recession. Unfortunately, Republicans won't permit any of Obama's job creation or stimulus bills to come up for a vote.

So rather than get Obama's "spending and debt", we're just left with George W. Bush's debt, as well as his tax cuts, which now fail to produce enough revenue to sustain the mandatory minimum government spending.

Oh boy. An "independent," third-party candidate who voted Republican ticket his entire life except for in 2007. Tea Party favorite, alumnus of the Glen Beck show, Michael Savage show, and others. Loves Barry Goldwater and Reagan, but has no horse in the two-party system.

Welcome to the Right-Wing Forward Museum

MyRightWingDad.net is a museum dedicated to following the course of American history through a unique lens -- the emails "Red-America" forwards worldwide. Take a look around the archive using the keywords below, and leave a comment or two.

This museum displays unedited, often offensive and untrue material with no endorsement intended by curators or contributors.