ENGAGE was launched at the beginning of Ramadan 1429 A.H (1st September 2008) in order to help encourage increased numbers of British Muslims to become more actively involved in engaging with the media and politics. In short, to become more active and engaged citizens of our country.

ENGAGE provides free seminars to Muslims in Britain to better enable them to challenge negative and unfair coverage and comment about Islam and Muslims in the UK.

ENGAGE also encourages voter registration amongst British Muslim communities and aims to provide the skills needed by Muslims to better engage in local and national political life in the UK. ENGAGE aims to improve the quality of Muslim engagement by supporting skills development and political awareness in British Muslim communities.

3. How is ENGAGE financed?

ENGAGE is financed entirely by charitable donations.

4. How will ENGAGE improve media and political engagement by Muslims?

ENGAGE aims to improve media and political engagement by Muslims through:

Providing training to Muslims on how best to challenge material published or broadcast that unfairly maligns Islam and Muslims

Encouraging voter registration campaigns

Providing resources and materials to inform British Muslims of media and political issues of importance and relevance to them as citizens of this country

Organising public forums for journalists to engage directly with Muslim communities

Better awareness of the consequences of remaining on the margins of political and media debates on Islam and Muslims in Britain

5. Why the focus on media and politics?

The attention focussed on Muslims in the media and politics and the lack of sufficient numbers of Muslims able to counter the volume of negative and unfair coverage is largely the reason for the focus on these areas.

A study done by the Cardiff School of Journalism in July 2008 found that the frequency of stories written on Muslims in the British press has risen massively over the last eight years. (Table taken from ‘Stories about British Muslims over time’, Images of Islam in the UK: The Representation of British Muslims in the National Print News Media 2000-2008 by Kerry Moore, Paul Mason and Justin Lewis. Cardiff School of Journalism, 2008, pg. 9)

Year

Frequency of Stories

2000

352

2001

2185

2002

1673

2003

1917

2004

2399

2005

3812

2006

4196

2007

3213

2008

3466

While coverage around 2001 and 2005 could be imputed to the attacks in New York and London, what the data reveals is the frequent conflation of reporting on terrorism with news stories on British Muslims.

The Cardiff study also found that around a quarter of the stories refer negatively to Islam as dangerous, archaic or irrational, with only 2% of them positively appraising Muslims’ acceptance of dominant moral values and around two thirds of the coverage of Islam and Muslims in Britain focuses on them as a threat, a problem or both.

The need for Muslims to counter and reverse the trend of malignant and derogatory press coverage, as well as greater involvement in politics and political debate is essential for reasons of equality, integrity and accountability.

All British citizens have a responsibility to help shape and create the kind of society that makes us proud to be British. ENGAGE endeavours to do this by supporting the contributions of British Muslims to British society.

6. Some Muslims argue that voting is forbidden and that Muslims that vote in elections are acting contrary to Islamic injunctions. What do you say to this?

The majority of Muslim scholars agree on the importance of political participation by Muslims irrespective of the fundamental nature of the society in which they live; whether Muslim or non Muslim. All Muslims are required to uphold and promote what is good and discourage what is bad. This is necessary whether you live in a Muslim majority society or as a minority in a non Muslim majority society. Muslim scholars argue that the essential purposes of shari’ah compel Muslims to act and participate in ways that protect and defend life, liberty and property, ie to work for the common good of all their fellow citizens.

Muslims are obliged to work in partnership with non-Muslims to ensure that policies and attitudes in their society are consistent with justice and equality for all. This can only be achieved through engagement and participation in the processes that shape our public culture and political life.

7. Some argue that Muslims that are involved in politics are only interested in furthering their own interests as a community, for example, lobbying for ‘special exemptions’. Is ENGAGE a ‘communal’ organisation only interested in the Muslim community?

No, ENGAGE does not seek special privileges or exemptions for Muslims. This is an argument often advanced by organisations that see any form of organisation by Muslims as the advocating of separatist agendas.

Muslims as British citizens, like all others, have a right and a duty to be actively engaged in the shaping and influencing of political and media debates about our society, our politics, our values and our shared future. ENGAGE aims to facilitate this dialogue and exchange by supporting Muslims around the UK to be more actively involved in media and politics at the local and national level. ENGAGE aims to ensure that media and political debate in and on the UK is more representative and more robust through greater Muslim participation. ENGAGE also aims to encourage Muslims to work for the common good through active participation in civic and voluntary bodies such as parent – governor associations, friendship societies and through volunteering.

8. Why should I ENGAGE? Can a single individual make a difference?

Shifting the burden of responsibility for affecting change in a society onto others is tantamount to neglect and indifference and is - in our view - not a responsible attitude towards life. If you don’t take an interest in those issues that shape your quality of life, or actively work to influence decisions that will shape your quality of life, one of two things will happen:

Firstly, your views and concerns will not be reflected in debates about those things you care about and which matter to you. Secondly, you will leave open a vacuum to be filled by those who will speak out and act on issues which may affect you. Where you remain silent others will advance and their objectives could well impact on you.

The success of the BNP in steadily increasing its number of councillors in local authorities presents a direct challenge to Muslims to either get involved or to sit back and watch as they become the targets of campaigns determined to stir up hatred of them and their religion. Indeed, the increased anti-Muslim prejudice in our society is not merely confined to far-right parties such as the BNP. Anti-Muslim prejudice has become far more mainstream in recent years.

Individuals can make a difference. Initiatives for change start with a single determined individual who connects, through argument and persuasion, with others in defence of a common objective. It is when individuals take that first step that movements for social change begin.

9. How will ENGAGE advance social cohesion?

Social cohesion is better attained through the active participation of all citizens in all spheres of society, economy and politics. It is also fostered through the cultivation and preservation of a public culture that values all citizens regardless of their religious, racial or ethnic backgrounds. In an effort to improve citizen participation the government has added teaching on active citizenship to the national curriculum in England and Wales. ENGAGE aims to encourage and enable active citizenship by British Muslims.

10. Is ENGAGE affiliated to any political organisation?

No. ENGAGE is a venture that is independent of all political affiliations. ENGAGE supports and complements the work of all political associations that aim to improve the level and quality of engagement from vulnerable and excluded communities.

11. I would like to support ENGAGE. What can I do?

You can:

Download and distribute the ENGAGE pocket guide on engaging with the media and politics

Organise an event in your local area and invite ENGAGE officials to speak to your local community on how to get started

Sign up for our email alerts to be kept informed of developments and ENGAGE meetings around the UK and help publicise them in your local area

Financially support ENGAGE by making a donation. Click on the ‘Support ENGAGE’ section for details on how to make a donation

12. Who speaks for ENGAGE?

ENGAGE would like to clarify that recent controversial views expressed by Inayat Bunglawala do not represent the views of ENGAGE.

The views and opinions of ENGAGE are expressed by its Trustees alone. No other persons are authorized to speak on behalf of ENGAGE. Our employees are clearly listed in the ENGAGE team section, which can be consulted here.

Last Updated on Thursday, 21 March 2013 17:09

ENGAGE briefing for the Police and Crime Commissioner Elections

04 December 2012

Introduction

On Thursday 15th November 2012, the electorate in England and Wales vote for the newly created position of Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) in 41 constabularies across England and Wales.

Each PCC will effectively take over the role currently performed by local Police Authorities, and will be responsible for ensuring efficient and effective policing as detailed in the policing plan and crime strategy formulated for each police force area. The PCCs will also be responsible for appointing and, if necessary,dismissing chief constables.

ENGAGE have developed a manifesto which we believe deals with the most urgent priorities in policing affecting British Muslims. We are working with grassroots communities and Muslim organisations to urge all PCC candidates to pledge their support for our key campaign issues:

Taking liberties

10 December 2013

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown in her column in the Independent yesterday returns to the topic of gender segregation in universities relaying the protest that is to take place in opposition to guidelines published a couple of weeks ago by Universities UK.

The guidelines deal with the subject of external speakers in higher education institutions following controversies and witchhunts sparked by vested ideological interest groups.

Alibhai-Brown picks up on the reference in the guidelines to the permissibility of segregated events on university campuses: “concerns…[for the] beliefs of those opposed to segregation should not result in a religious group being prevented from having a debate in accordance with its belief systems”. Deriding the provision as a ‘capitulation’ and a ‘disaster for feminism, for university life, for modernism and progressive ideals and for Muslims most of all’, Alibhai Brown argues that "Sexist dress codes and other behaviours are being spread and pushed in British universities by retrograde Islamic societies and individuals, most of them men – though there are always willing maidens who say “yes, yes, yes” to such diktats”.

With echoes of her remarks of niqab and burqa wearers being 'proxy maidens to the Taliban’ on account of their choice of dress, Alibhai Brown offers ‘Saudi Arabian obscurantism’ as the reason behind segregation opted for by some Muslims.

Indeed, Alibhai-Brown decries the ignominy these ‘obscurantist Muslims’ are left to wallow in because “our educators do not liberate them from dark age interpretations of Islam but rather encourage them.”

Alibhai-Brown fails to see her own betrayal of liberal values with her uncompromising stance against accepting the right of others to practice religious as they choose, liberal or conservative, as long as it remains within the law. To set the normative standard on Islam as a parochial understanding of ‘moderate’ or ‘progressive’, to the exclusion of all other forms of practicing religion, is hardly the mark of a ‘liberal’, much less a ‘progressive’.

Nor is the claim that such practices are ‘reactionary’ or ‘retrograde’ in the least bit accurate. Muslims who choose the burqa or niqab, or who opt for segregated seating at events, display the tendencies of a modern subject exercising choice and agency.