As I mentioned in this morning's post here, an average American before 1964 in my neighborhood in the South would regard this site as somewhere between moderate and moderate, slightly left-of-center.

This therefore means that the date of this definition (before the Civil Rights Act of 1964) automatically makes it superior to modern definitions of this site offered by the MSM of the late 20th and early 21st Centuries.

Unfortunately, I believe at least some of us harbor an uneasy albeit perhaps subliminal suspicion that the MSM is correct and that we are low persons--right-wing extremists, haters, etc.

This is patently nonsense. We are in fact the center. The wingnuts that now run the country are the radicals. Never forget this.

As someone wisely posted elsewhere on the Board, we cannot please everyone anyhow, so we may as well please ourselves:

An old man, a boy & a donkey were going to town.
The boy rode on the donkey & the old man walked.
As they went along they passed some people
Who remarked it was a shame the old man
Was walking and the boy was riding.

The man and boy thought maybe the critics were right,
So they changed positions.

Then, later, they passed some people who remarked,
'What a shame, he makes that little boy walk.'

So they then decided they'd both walk!
Soon they passed some more people who thought
They were stupid to walk when they had a
Decent donkey to ride.
So, they both rode the donkey.

Now they passed some people
Who shamed them by saying how awful to
Put such a load on a poor donkey.

The boy and man figured they were probably right,
So they decide to carry the donkey.
As they crossed the bridge,
They lost their grip on the animal
And he fell into the river and drowned.

The moral of the story?

If you try to please everyone,
You might as well..

Kiss your ass goodbye!

From Waaay Out West,

--HLM

__________________

In a time of drastic change it is the learners who inherit the future. The learned usually find themselves equipped to live in a world that no longer exists.Eric Hoffer

Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength.

Eric Hoffer

The misery of a child is interesting to a mother, the misery of a young man is interesting to a young woman, the misery of an old man is interesting to nobodyEric Hoffer

When cowardice becomes a fashion its adherents are without number, and it masquerades as forbearance, reasonableness and whatnotEric Hoffer

Our credulity is greatest concerning the things we know least about. And since we know least about ourselves, we are ready to believe all that is said about us. Hence the mysterious power of both flattery and calumny.Eric Hoffer

As I mentioned in this morning's post here, an average American before 1964 in my neighborhood in the South would regard this site as somewhere between moderate and moderate, slightly left-of-center.

This therefore means that the date of this definition (before the Civil Rights Act of 1964) automatically makes it superior to modern definitions of this site offered by the MSM of the late 20th and early 21st Centuries.

Unfortunately, I believe at least some of us harbor an uneasy albeit perhaps subliminal suspicion that the MSM is correct and that we are low persons--right-wing extremists, haters, etc.

This is patently nonsense. We are in fact the center. The wingnuts that now run the country are the radicals. Never forget this.

As someone wisely posted elsewhere on the Board, we cannot please everyone anyhow, so we may as well please ourselves:

An old man, a boy & a donkey were going to town.
The boy rode on the donkey & the old man walked.
As they went along they passed some people
Who remarked it was a shame the old man
Was walking and the boy was riding.

The man and boy thought maybe the critics were right,
So they changed positions.

Then, later, they passed some people who remarked,
'What a shame, he makes that little boy walk.'

So they then decided they'd both walk!
Soon they passed some more people who thought
They were stupid to walk when they had a
Decent donkey to ride.
So, they both rode the donkey.

Now they passed some people
Who shamed them by saying how awful to
Put such a load on a poor donkey.

The boy and man figured they were probably right,
So they decide to carry the donkey.
As they crossed the bridge,
They lost their grip on the animal
And he fell into the river and drowned.

The moral of the story?

If you try to please everyone,
You might as well..

Kiss your ass goodbye!

From Waaay Out West,

--HLM

You said it so well, HLM, as usual.

"an average American before 1964 in my neighborhood in the South would regard this site as somewhere between moderate and moderate, slightly left-of-center."

This is so true. A liberal of the 1950's would be considered a far right winger today. A conservative of the 1950's, wow that would be off the charts, they probably would be called a, hmmm, 'White Nationalist' today.

"Unfortunately, I believe at least some of us harbor an uneasy albeit perhaps subliminal suspicion that the MSM is correct and that we are low persons--right-wing extremists, haters, etc."

Again, so true. Many even here on SF have almost an aplogogetic tone all the time. Not that I'm advocating anything unreasonable in the approach to didactics. But people do harbor a guilt complex for being racialist, probably are looking over their shoulder when they log onto SF even. We all have been brainwashed by MSM and have this residual guilt within us.

I know, how can we be guilty of anything, after all this is a White Pride Movement? I have not advocated gassing Jews or anything, I want to highlight love for my race, I could care less about other races, except that they leave mine alone. And yet we are brainwashed to feel guilty about that, that maybe we really are the evil Nazis that the MSM calls us. Sometimes you see members who post here a long time, but then request their accounts disabled. Sometimes it is done with almost a shame about their actvities here, they never quite shook the guilt. So true, and sad.

It's a fine line between chaos and freedom, and The Mods sure have a tough job trying to police it. If you want to see a free for all, check out VNN, where 50% of the energy there is spent in calling out one another. But it gives the movement that outlet and helps some folks to blow off steam I guess.

Back to the topic, the word ZOG was probably invented here on SF?, but it has entered the mainstream. It has a beastly pallor to it, like the thing it represents. It is a monster's name, like Gollum or Hulk. It has meaning as such, adding power. You can bet the Zionists don't want a monster's name affixed to them, they are probably infuriated about it. Need we delve into just how monstrous they are? How many deaths in the last 100 years were caused by Governments, and Zionist ones in particular? If this does not qualify them for Monster Status, I don't know what does.

Likewise, I have often used the term 'Fed Beast' to denote my disgust at the feds for something beastly they did, I cannot mention 'Ruby Ridge' without using 'Fed Beast' at least once. I also use 'Fed Beast' when I want to highlight the ugliness of some policy or another. Others, though no one has said anything to me about such usage, may be offended if they are motivated by the inner guilt complex for being WNs. This guilt is tripped off more if they hear someone bad mouth the government.

Some have advocated we start calling Obama, 'President' Obama. Some have said, "what's wrong with calling him 'President'". This after so many on SF this winter seemed to reach a consensus that they would slip into their speech the word 'Usurper' now and then. The WN here were greatly depressed because Obama won the election and is now ruling, with his cadre of Marxists. It's a bit much to expect them to refer to Obama as 'President'. It's political rhetoric, to be sure, but after all, this is not your Granny's knitting circle, right?

I suggested on at least two occasions already that the newbies should be put on a leash, and the jews who pretend to be WN's that are here to cast doubt in the minds of the casual reader should quickly be put into OV, either that are have their leash tightened a bit. As for the latter group, along with casting doubt in the minds of the fence-sitters and the unaware visitors is the name of the game. If they can do their part in their sometimes obvious attempts at making WN's look like kooks in the eyes of our people for simply using abbreviated terms such as ZOG, all the better for them.

WN's who use the term ZOG are not hurting the cause, it is people like this newbie who are doing major damage in my estimation. I too smell a rat, a kosher rat. A good dose of common sense as to what hurts our chances of reaching our people has been desperately needed. See above.

I don't like the attitude and words of this new poster either, including the smearing and psychoanalysis, to me it is blatantly obvious and an easy call. However, it shouldn't have to get to this point.

PS- I'll spell out 'zionist occupied government' (ZOG) from now on, because its the truth; just as the fact that the jews control the media.

You'd think someone would heed your warning. The subterfuge here is so apparent. It seems it's more important to chastise true SFers for their misspellings.

You're opinion isn't humble. You've accused me of sucking up to mods, advocated closing off free speech, being a troll, trying to derail discussion. You might need to crack open a dictionary once in a while if you think you've been giving your "humble" opinion.

I really do want to know what the point was when you quoted my post. I think this is a pretty civil request after being called a troll, suck up, and free speech hater.

I would add Jewish Apologist or Jewish Collaborator. Which one would you prefer Mark 3 22?

I would add Jewish Apologist or Jewish Collaborator. Which one would you prefer Mark 3 22?

Of course you would. The Internet has created a noble and righteous warrior breed. Not really the sharpest tools in the shed, but certainly a group with an abundance of Jew naming abilities. Honestly, I wouldn't prefer either one; but that's not really important. What's really important is to know what you want me to be.

Of course you would. The Internet has created a noble and righteous warrior breed. Not really the sharpest tools in the shed, but certainly a group with an abundance of Jew naming abilities. Honestly, I wouldn't prefer either one; but that's not really important. What's really important is to know what you want me to be.

Back to the topic, the word ZOG was probably invented here on SF?, but it has entered the mainstream. It has a beastly pallor to it, like the thing it represents. It is a monster's name, like Gollum or Hulk. It has meaning as such, adding power. You can bet the Zionists don't want a monster's name affixed to them, they are probably infuriated about it. Need we delve into just how monstrous they are? How many deaths in the last 100 years were caused by Governments, and Zionist ones in particular? If this does not qualify them for Monster Status, I don't know what does.

This is one of the reasons 'conservative' venues fail the test in continuing this struggle.

In point of fact, David Eden Lane coined this term somehwere in mid to late eighties, as well as numerous other acronyms, aphorisms, and unique pieces of WN propaganda; and celebrating his birthday on this site was something which was never realized.

To be ready for the Future, one must needs be cognizant of the Past and its hard won lessons.

Back to the topic, the word ZOG was probably invented here on SF?, but it has entered the mainstream. It has a beastly pallor to it, like the thing it represents. It is a monster's name, like Gollum or Hulk. It has meaning as such, adding power. You can bet the Zionists don't want a monster's name affixed to them, they are probably infuriated about it. Need we delve into just how monstrous they are? How many deaths in the last 100 years were caused by Governments, and Zionist ones in particular? If this does not qualify them for Monster Status, I don't know what does.

Likewise, I have often used the term 'Fed Beast' to denote my disgust at the feds for something beastly they did, I cannot mention 'Ruby Ridge' without using 'Fed Beast' at least once. I also use 'Fed Beast' when I want to highlight the ugliness of some policy or another. Others, though no one has said anything to me about such usage, may be offended if they are motivated by the inner guilt complex for being WNs. This guilt is tripped off more if they hear someone bad mouth the government.

Some have advocated we start calling Obama, 'President' Obama. Some have said, "what's wrong with calling him 'President'". This after so many on SF this winter seemed to reach a consensus that they would slip into their speech the word 'Usurper' now and then. The WN here were greatly depressed because Obama won the election and is now ruling, with his cadre of Marxists. It's a bit much to expect them to refer to Obama as 'President'. It's political rhetoric, to be sure, but after all, this is not your Granny's knitting circle, right?

Yes, ZOG is an excellent terminology. It sounds as evil as the luciferians it represents. I think we should use it much, much, more. Certainly not less. It sounds so, well, disrespectful. How appropriate can you get? I also like parasite. How accurate can you get? Or Swarm, or Hive, comparing jews to insects. I like those alot. HIVE is a good word to explain the jew mindset, how they work as a group to inflict their evil agendas, on white European Christians. It's an accurate description of the millenniums old, collective consciousness of shared beliefs and moral attitudes, in the case of jews, a lack of morals, which operates as a destructive unit within a society. In the case of the West, they are destroying our societies, deliberately. Now I don't have a link to prove my contention, so, you can believe me or not, but I think 99% here will understand what I'm saying.

Now, those non-jews who knowingly or unknowingly work for the hive, are "the useful idiots" for the proletariat. They are the same useful idiots for liberalism & socialism, which are the same useful idiots for the Bolshevik Zionists who are bringing this destruction together. These are the same useful idiots who work for the NWO. The above mentioned groups and all the tools being used to destroy our once free society, are all creations of the hive they serve. We can now watch them in action right here at SF. No need to post on mainstream message boards. The useful idiots have arrived here.

Of course you would. The Internet has created a noble and righteous warrior breed. Not really the sharpest tools in the shed, but certainly a group with an abundance of Jew naming abilities. Honestly, I wouldn't prefer either one; but that's not really important. What's really important is to know what you want me to be.

What is important is that I know you for what you are. And now you know I know.

Now, those non-jews who knowingly or unknowingly work for the hive, are "the useful idiots" for the proletariat. They are the same useful idiots for liberalism & socialism, which are the same useful idiots for the Bolshevik Zionists who are bringing this destruction together. These are the same useful idiots who work for the NWO. The above mentioned groups and all the tools being used to destroy our once free society, are all creations of the hive they serve. We can now watch them in action right here at SF. No need to post on mainstream message boards. The useful idiots have arrived here.