If Park Bank is liable for not spotting Sujata "Sue" Sachdeva's $34 million embezzlement from Koss Corp. and has to reimburse the company, Koss Chief Executive Michael Koss should also be ordered to personally pay the public company he runs, the bank argues in a new lawsuit.

Grant Thornton, Koss Corp.'s former auditor, should also have to pay a portion of any award that may be ordered, Park Bank argued in the latest twist in a long-running court fight stemming from Sachdeva's massive embezzlement.

"Park Bank denies any and all liability to Koss in this case," the bank said in its action. "Nevertheless, should Park Bank be found liable to Koss (Corp.) and required to pay damages to Koss, in this case, those damages will have been the result of a common liability of Park Bank, Michael Koss and Grant Thornton, thereby entitling Park Bank to (a) contribution from Michael Koss and Grant Thornton."(10)

While we strive for a lively and vigorous debate of the issues, we do not tolerate name calling, foul language or other inappropriate behavior. Please see our discussion guidelines and terms of use for more information.

While we do our best to moderate comments, we do not screen comments before they are posted. If you see a comment that violates our guidelines, please use the "Report Abuse" link to notify us of the issue.

Took a while for Lincoln to find Grant. The "slows" reference was Lincoln's commentary on McClellan. He had trained a great army but never could find the perfect time to deploy it against Lee. Almost like having a huge amount of money in cap space and never quite finding the perfect player to sign. Almost.

Grahm hasn't done much? I'm assuming that is sarcasm. 16 TDs last year - no TE or WR close to that. Avg double digit TDs, 1100 yards, 85 catches the last 3 years. Kid is 27 years old. No way NO let's him go - think that is why they cleaned house on sproles, et al.

Ware to the Broncos. They have no qualms about going for it do they. Another one bites the dust. I am sure our 6th round pick will light it up as a pass rusher though this year who ever it is. By that time Matthews will be hurt again so they will have to.

Not upset about Ware. You can admire the Broncos if you want. When Manning is no longer their QB they will be in horrible shape with no developing talent. Once you start relying on the one year or two year contributions of vets just starting the downside, it gets tougher and tougher to rebuild your team when those vets are gone.

Yah Ware for 10mil a year? Talib was overpaid. I don't see Broncos being that much better. Miller will still be out at least half of the year. Sportscenter will say Broncos got an A in free agency, but I dont see that.

Yeah like i said it will be great to watch our swiss cheese d get carved up over and over again. Wait I forgot TT will bring in his 6 undrafted free agents to bolster the squad. I forgot he does love free agency just the kind that no one else cares about.

Ware was too risky at that price. Denver got a good deal on Talib. Basically same price at Shields if he is there 4 years - which at his age is very realistic. IF he gets another gun charge, he forfeits parts of the signing bonus (spread over 6 years). For 9 MM a year, who are qbs more afraid to go against - hands down talib. Still, like Pack keeping shields, disagree ILLINI that it was a high cost for Denver the way it was structured.

Ware, Jared Allen and Julius Peppers are all proto type 4-3 ends. What that means my friends is to play in GB for Dom Kapers they would need to gain 20 pounds or play linebacker. Even if we wanted to spend that kind of cash, they would all be a bad fit for our defense.

Ware is a special player. I would have been thrilled to have him in the Green and Gold. If not him, I'm intrigued to see what Neal can become. I'm shocked at the lack of respect for perhaps the best linebacker of the current generation. I have a ton of respect for Ware.

True, 1st round picks are pricey, but at the same time, outside of Raji and Matthews their first round picks have been average at best. Not including Rodgers because that was a need and a steal at that point.

I wouldn't say he is "light years better than Finley." That would be very hard to back up, but I certainly think he is a better TE than Quarless, Money would probably the only difference, but if Daniels is sound physically, I say go for it. If Houston didn't want to pay him approx $ 6 million, the price to sign him should be lower than this. It should also total much less than Finley, who they probably don't want to take a risk on. Pony up the money and they will have a legitimate receiving threat at TE again. With the way contracts are structured these days, I don't think you have to worry about being committed for the long-term.

Daniels is no where near as dynamic a pass catcher than Finley. Is he better than Quarless, as of this moment yes. But Quarless is younger and can still develop. But for short term insurance the Packers could certainly do worse than Daniels, the price may be right.

Can somebody review the fate of the free agents who signed on the first couple of days last year? Were they sooooo transformative that they were worth every penny? Unless there is a Reggie White or a Charles Woodson out there, free agency is a fallacy, folks. More often than not, it's the ultimate Fool's Gold. Let everybody else mess up their salary cap. Marcus Ware? He must have led the Dallas Dooms Day Defense that could not guard its own cheerleaders last year. Was Revis really a big difference maker in Tampa? Why is everyone bemoaning the fact that the Packers stay away from beat up old football players who have seen better days? We should be thankful they don't.

I agree with everything you're saying here. Here's a link to Yahoo's Day 1 Free Agent winners from last season: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/nfl-free-agency-2013-day-one-winners-044134972--nfl.html