The first Marxist Conservative government in history -Part III

This article is re-published from ‘Free Nations’ with kind permission by the author. Part I was published on UKIPDaily here and part 2 here.

Feminism – as most ably promoted by the BBC – was always a cultural Marxist idea for suppressing what they called the ‘patriarchal’ family which was too conservative! Theresa May was proud to wear a tea shirt with the motto “This is what a feminist looks like”. She has never been known to attack the fatuous extremes of feminism and under her Government the feminist bandwagon rolls on.

A good example of what such attitudes bring about in the real world of life and death is the massive discrepancy between spending on breast cancer which is twice the level of spending on (the male) prostate cancer – even though deaths stand at about 11,000 a year for both cancers! Angela Culhane, chief executive of the charity Prostate Cancer UK, said this naturally resulted in half the level of research into prostate cancer.

Abortion has been seen by feminism as an ‘inalienable right’ and millions of lives have been slaughtered in the womb as a result. We now know that in Conservative Britain the NHS does not collect statistics on those aborted babies who are removed alive and are then killed! It probably amounts to some 10% of abortions.

THERESA MAY’S MINISTRY OF TRUTH

The Prime Minister plans a ‘dedicated national security communications unit’ (sounds like a Ministry of Information) which will ‘be tasked with combating disinformation’ (sounds like George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth).

As someone who reads news from all over the world every day, provided by many national and supranational news media, I see misinformation, propaganda and above all censored non reported news – mostly from the outlets setting up ‘anti fake news’ units and which Mrs May doubtless trusts. I also see information, real news, different angles, well documented commentary and news of unrest, riots and government tyrannies which are not reported in Britain.

If the British Government cannot rely on the good sense of its own people, cannot permit anything but Government-approved news and uses taxpayers money to publish political judgements on other peoples’ news then we have sunk to new anti-democratic depths – but depths in which Marxist regimes have always delighted.

But the State promotion of political extremes does not stop there. In Mrs May’s Government the Ministry of Defence flies the LGBT flag and in February 2018 the British Foreign Office in London handed out free hijabs to its employees. Maajid Nawaz, head of the counter Islamic extremist Quilliam Foundation, remarked: “Supporting World Hijab Day and the institutional oppression of women through modesty culture, while brave Iranian women risk all to remove hijab tyranny.”

As a Tory MP remarked there was no handing out of Christian crosses.

ALTERNATIVE SEXUALITIES

A notable supporter of the Frankfurt School was one Daniel Cohn Bendit, a revolutionary Marxist of part French part German background. In 1970 revolutionary sexuality was put into practice in the ‘Rote Freiheit Schule’ sponsored by the Psychology Institute of the Free University of Berlin where ‘sex exercises’ were conducted and a ‘f………hour’. Cohn Bendit taught there and later described his sexual experiences with children:

At nine in the morning, I join my eight little toddlers between the ages of 16 months and 2 years. I wash their butts, I tickle them, they tickle me and we cuddle. … You know, a child’s sexuality is a fantastic thing. You have to be honest and sincere. With the very young kids, it isn’t the same as it is with the four-to-six-year-olds. When a little five-year-old girl starts undressing, it’s great, because it’s a game. It’s an incredibly erotic game.

Today Cohn Bendit is a member of the European Parliament. His German Green Party at the State level (Nord Rhein Westfalen) in 1985 had as its policy that ‘nonviolent sexuality‘ between children and adults should generally be allowed, without any age restrictions.

Consensual sexual relations between adults and children must be decriminalized.

In Britain the National Council for Civil Liberties was headed by Patricia Hewitt, the future Health Secretary, where another future prominent Labour cabinet Minister Harriet Harman was a legal officer. The NCCL allowed to be affiliated to it the Paedophile Information Exchange which openly promoted sexual relations with children. It was later closed and most of its leading members convicted of criminal offences.

We cannot accuse the Marxist Conservatism today of having committed to these perversions but all the above mentioned figures are enthusiastic supporters of the LGBT movement today which receives such promotion from a Conservative government. And once we break down the definitions of sexual morality, gender, wife and husband, man and woman even the most obscene sexual revolutionaries feel they are in with a chance of recognition – as we now see below.

TRANSGENDERISM AND DRUGGING OF MINORS

The Frankfurt School revolutionaries had not thought of this useful weapon in the distortion of natural society but today it is the ‘T’ in the ‘LGBT’ revolutionary bandwagon.

Justine Greening, until recently the Conservative Secretary of State for Education, said that people should be able spontaneously to ‘choose their gender’ – and therefore of course demand their ‘rights’ as their new gender – including for instance ‘trans’ men choosing to use ladies’ toilets.

The final part of this piece will be published here on UKIPDaily in the near future

About The Author

RA is the author of 7 books on political economy and the EU, an occasional adviser to Minsters and MPs since 1981, the founder of the Freenations website which is read in over 100 countries and a previous parliamentary candidate for the Referendum Party and UKIP. In 2000 he came within a few votes of winning the UKIP leadership election.

24 Comments

Pamela
on June 19, 2018 at 5:54 pm

I’ve thoroughly enjoyed this romp through recent history, thanks very much. I thought some here might enjoy watching this interview with Yuri Bezmenov, a KGB operative who defected to Canada in 1970. He speaks openly about exactly how Marxist thought undermines western institutions, etc. If you watch, you’ll note he doesn’t just say ‘Marxist’, he says JEWISH Marxist ideology. That’s the way he thought, so be it. At any rate, the interview runs about an hour and 20 minutes. Enjoy.

Thank you for yet another excellent essay. It would seem the 3rd-way progressives are succeeding in re-engineering society through all kinds of psychological abuse and that the demoralising, destabilising and “normalising” tactics of the Fabian, Marcusian, and Frankfurt school types, and have found allies in the very worst ideas of atavistic religion, narcissism, international collectivism (communism) and corporate-fascist Statism.
As Von Hayek said, “’Emergencies’ have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded… When it becomes dominated by a collectivist creed, democracy will inevitably destroy itself.”
As Jung famously wrote “since the world began, mankind has been possessed.” Possession is synonymous with bondage, of a mental kind, imposed by fixed dogmatic political and religious beliefs or the collective programming of a cultural model. Jung comments that in states of possession it comes down to “the same age-old experience: something objectively psychic and strange to us, not under our control, is fixedly opposed to the sovereignty of our will.” “Possession” means being supplanted by something other than our own will, being taken over and “owned” by something alien from ourselves. Jung says, “Wherever we are still attached, we are still possessed; and when we are possessed, there is one stronger than us who possesses us.” It has taken the rational enlightenment and the disasters of the C20th (seen into by psychoanalysis that is still in its infancy) to realise that there are deeply disturbed forces at work.. (Jung, ‘The Undiscovered Self’)
What is happening is that the State is creating a power struggle between itself and the will of the people. The Government and its officers, being possessed by higher elements globally and institutionally, has lost its link to the people whom it should represent. It represents itself and higher agencies that control it psychologically. This as you rightly say is hypnosis – and might even be occult control and the re-feudalising of society.

There is, to my mind , only one answer. Expose the LibLabCon Party persuade people to stop voting for them and reform our Democracy. Sounds awfully simple after your comment and is certainly a tall order. But we must believe it is possible. My own feelings are that all like minded people should work together to achieve this goal, regardless of what alternative party or group they belong to.

I feel Rodney Atkinson has hit the nail on the head. At the next election we shall be confronted with a choice of Marxist Conservative NOT or extreme Marxist Labour.
On the conservative side, we have a discredited, semi bankrupt UKIP and a struggling, poorly funded For Britain. Who is going to fill the vacuum?

The sheer size and scale of the recent Tommy Robinson protest to me provides a direct and clear indication of just how strongly the general public feels about paedophilia (yes let’s call a spade a spade here) and the frantic attempts to cover it up and the lengths they went too to do so, reveal just how politically vulnerable the guilty are. Especially if they’re no longer in control of the police and judiciary.
As I see it UKIP is the only British party that’s willing to do something about it.
To become capable of doing something about it UKIP will need to get the public to stop with the candles and teddy-bears and instead do something that really can change things.
We need get them to give us their votes.

Appropriately named Daniel Cohn-Bendit (aka “Danny the Red”), former Co-President of the European Greens–European Free Alliance group in the European Parliament, recipient of the EU’s European Initiative Prize in 2016, published a number of highly offensive statements regarding “sex with children” in the 1970s and early 1980s, notably in his 1975 book The Great Bazaar (‘Der grosse Basar’) where he describes in detail erotic encounters with five-year-olds in his time as a TEACHER in an anti-authoritarian kindergarten.

Since at least 2001, Cohn-Bendit has been accused of defending paedophilia during the 1970s. This controversy re-surfaced in 2013: as Cohn-Bendit received the Theodor Heuss Prize, there was a rally by anti-paedophilia activists. The president of Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court cited the book as grounds for his refusal to give the speech at the awards ceremony. The affair triggered wider research into the pro-paedophilia activism which prevailed in the German Green Party (without direct involvement on the part of Cohn-Bendit) well into the 1980s.

An article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung uncovered several “repulsive” passages (‘abstoßende Texte’) in Pflasterstrand, a leftist magazine for which Cohn-Bendit was, under press law, responsible. It cited a 1978 defence of Cohn-Bendit’s of this editorial practice, as well as an appearance of Cohn-Bendit in a French television talk-show in 1982 where he described a five-year-old undressing herself as an “erotic game”. Cohn-Bendit reacted to these allegations by claiming that his descriptions of erotic encounters with pre-pubescent girls were not based on true events but were merely intended as what he today calls “obnoxious provocation” aimed at questioning sexual morals at the time that “shouldn’t have been written that way”.

QUESTION

Will the Europe that his precious EU is mutating, demographically and socio-economically, into more suit the likes of this Cohn-Bendit?

I recall it being reported that David Cameron has said that he considered his greatest achievement as Prime Minister to be the introduction of the Same Sex Marriage Act. A Humpty Dumpty moment if ever there was.

From “Through the Looking Glass,” the quote is:

When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful
tone,it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor
less.’

Indeed, but the most worrying aspect of the SSM is their being allowed to adopt kids. How is a young kid going to develop as a normal person under such influence? Seems to me that it is a blatant attempt to increase the queer population which of course cannot happen by normal means.

JsckT wrote: “Indeed, but the most worrying aspect of the SSM is their being allowed to adopt kids. How is a young kid going to develop as a normal person under such influence?”

While I doubt that FOI (Freedom Of Information) requests will produce honest (or any) responses, I would like to know the proportions of:
(a) 2xM SSMs seeking to adopt or succeeding in adopting a male child, and
(b) 2xF SSMs … female child.

I agree completely Rodney, I am pleased that you are in the ranks of UKIP. Recently when it because apparent that this transgender propaganda was being forced on small children, I said to a friend that the next step is the legalisation and encouragement of adults having sex with children. This person (a woman) was horrified at the suggestion and implied that I was taking an extreme view. Your article seems to confirm that my prophecy is coming true.

Well, the Paedophile Information Exchange (P.I.E.) – search for Harman above if you need to find it in Rodney’s text – at one point conceded that there should be a minimum age of consent, i.e. an age below which the child legally *cannot* be held to have consented to the sexual activity.

What was that age?

At one point, P.I.E. discussed/advocated it to be set to ONE YEAR OLD.

i.e., had the view prevailed, then if an infant was at least one year old, it was legally possible for a defence of consent to intercourse, buggery or whatever to be entered.

I am sorry but I cannot talk about this any more it just makes me feel physically sick, it is like living in some sort of horror movie, I am so glad my life is relatively normal and I do not share these abhorrent views on children that these vile perverts do, may they rot in hell!