My question, to those who feel that way, is why do you feel that communists are any worse for WN than capitalists???

From the very start Communism was multiracial, namely uniting the workers of the world against the ruling classes of the world. Capitalsim on the other hand can be Nationalist or Internationalist. In addition what we have today in the US and Europe is not really Capitalism but Corporate Socialism.

One thing that I have noticed amongst those who dislike this [OWS] movement is that a major gripe is that they feel that many of the occupiers are "communists."

Right, like everyone suddenly became a communist. That's baloney. I think some people on here are Zionists defending the current system, while they pay lip service to being WNs, so they just call them commies. I think it's a lie, and I think people who are fixated on spreading such lies are poison to our movement. They just cause division and make us look stupid and bigoted, and they talk about how much ammo they have stored up. I really don't think they are on our side. Like William Pierce said, some people are poison and he had to learn to not tolerate them.

Likewise, corporations are fundamentally anti-nationalist and anti-white (anti-loyalty to any group, actually.) The directors of a corporation are bound by law to make those decisions that will best benefit the shareholders (in other words...make the most money.) Therefore a corporation is BOUND to be disloyal to a race or a nation if it means more profit. ... Why the defense of capitalism?

Short answer: people defend capitalism because they see you as either a capitalist or a commie. End of story. They lack education and originality so they can't see much else. The left/right media divide encourages this.

The law could be changed so corporations protect the people. Sadly, congress does seem to care about the people. Globalization is a big problem here. The country is run more or less like a business for the benefit of business not the people. It's America Incorporated. It's profits before people, especially White people.

There are many different ways to design a "capitalist" system. Actually, there are also many kinds of systems. Few people seem to know the differences between them. Like is our system capitalist or corporatist? I bet very few people could answer that correctly. It sure as heck is not a free market system.

I support capitalism under its real definition, we do not have a capitalist society today in the west... it is over regulated and corrupted by commercial interest. Commercialism is what your really against... not capitalism.

Interesting thread. As a "creator"-type person, I believe that a genuine Capitalist system is the only system which allows for individual uniqueness. I find it weird that so many entertainers and people in the arts are on a "socialist" bent, because a socialist system would ultimately mean that an artist would sacrifice their own ingenuity for the sake of the status-quo establishment. However, it is not really capitalism that they are rebelling from, but "commercialism". Commercialism leads to the same dead end as socialism. Commercialism, that is, profit-value, becomes the standard by which everything is judged, which takes into account only the power of profit, in the hands of uncaring profiteers and politicians. Profiteers and politicians benefit through multiculturalism, for a few reasons. Multiculturalism is used as a "commercialism" strategy as much as it is used as a socialist ploy, but for a different reason. For one thing, the commercialist producers who are only concerned with profits will see the potential consumerism in every group of people, regardless of their actual earning power. It does not matter to a commercialist whether the American blacks get their money through welfare, or, through earning it. There is a certain "commercial" market for specific black American products, and that is what certain commercialist producers would cater to. So, it is "commercialism" that actually makes Capitalism into kind of a mediocrity, where everyone must ultimately conform to the call of profit. The reason why creative-type people seem to lean towards multiculturalism is because the premise of diversity gives the illusion of tolerance, and acceptance of the unique.So creative people would be in favor of appreciation of "differentness". It appears to be a kind of freedom, one that is seductive to a creative person. It does not matter to these creative-types if this tolerance is born from the profit -motive of commercialism, or from the Socialist agenda of crossing-out exceptionality in order to equalize everyone, in the communist spirit (which also works against them, just as "commercialism does) Fortunately, I saw through this illusion quite a while ago, so I consider myself among the more "enlightened" of my ilk. Hope I haven't been too oblique. <--- smug/LOL

Interesting thread. As a "creator"-type person, I believe that a genuine Capitalist system is the only system which allows for individual uniqueness. I find it weird that so many entertainers and people in the arts are on a "socialist" bent, because a socialist system would ultimately mean that an artist would sacrifice their own ingenuity for the sake of the status-quo establishment.

Short answer: people defend capitalism because they see you as either a capitalist or a commie. End of story.

I think you've nailed it.
Reading through this thread I see people "defending" capitalism by telling me that communism is a bad system.
I agree that communism is a bad system, but do we really need to choose between the two.
People here seem ready to ban anything (television, books, drugs, etc.) in order to protect the White race, but they'll support free market economics. That makes NO sense! If there's one thing that should be heavily regulated to protect our people, it's big business! We need to make sure the fat cats don't harm us...they can certainly do more harm than a book can!
That doesn't mean we need to adopt communism. But it means that corporations should have to work not only to further their stock profiles, but to further the country, the environment, and in a perfect world, the race.
They can still make money...but the priorities must shift so they can't sell us all out in the process.

__________________

Quote:

The mental characteristics of the Mediterranean race are well known, and this race, while inferior in bodily stamina to both the Nordic and the Alpine, is probably the superior of both, certainly of the Alpines, in intellectual attainments. In the field of art its superiority to both the other European races is unquestioned. - Madison Grant

Quote:

So far as modern Europe is concerned culture came from the south and not from the east, and to
this Mediterranean subspecies is due the foundation of our civilization.
- also Madison Grant

Two mistakes recur here. First, National Socialists also take a dim view of capitalism for many reasons I could enumerate if anyone is interested. Second, the Occupy movement is not objecting so much to capitalism, it is objecting to the system we have now which is NOT capitalism. In fact, this is the heart of their protest. What we have is public risk for private profit. This means risk takers have free reign on Wall Street to gamble money borrowed from the Fed. at almost zero interest but even if they lose, we the people are called upon to make their debt good. They point out that unfairness but also the unfairness that the same ill-gotten money is used by Wall Street to grease the pipeline, pay lobbyists, to keep the unjust situation in place.

Does this remind you of any other situation? How about the American -Israeli relationship in which aid is given but a portion used to grease the pipeline; bought politicians, and no-risk Israel being indemnified by the United States no matter what they do.

We need to point out these problems and the similarity to the Israel situation to anyone who will listen.