Imagine that an organism is sick. Imagine that the sick cells convince the organism that they were healthy, and in fact, the healthy cells are sick. The gullible organism would just get sicker and sicker.

This is the relationship between society and homosexuals today. Gays argue that same-sex behavior is no different than being left-handed. On the other hand, they say heterosexual behavior is not natural, but socially conditioned and oppressive. Heterosexual society and family are being ravaged. Our stupid, opportunistic and craven leaders have betrayed us. We don´t even know we are at war.

Let´s decide whom, in fact, is sick.

Let´s look at gay behavior as defined by two gays, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90´s(1989).

In Chapter Six, they outline ten categories of misbehavior, drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the gay lifestyle, not gay sexuality mind you, is the pits. They want gays to improve their image by addressing what is wrong with a lot of gays. (276)

What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human community, including the Mafia that could make these generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if we haven´t caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.

 The authors say a surprisingly high percentage of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one´s own gayness and its implications.

 They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to If it feels good, I´ll do it! If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend´s lover, he´ll do it, justifying it as an act of sexual freedom and the friend be damned.

 They say gays suffer from a narcissistic personality disorder and they give this clinical description: pathological self absorption, a need for constant attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance, superficially charming, promiscuous, exploitative, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation.

 As an example of this narcissism, the authors say a very sizable proportion of gay men who have been diagnosed HIV positive continue to have unprotected sex.

 They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begins with alcohol and drugs and includes such forbidden aspects of sex as wallowing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism, which involves violence.

 They say many gays indulge in sex in public bathrooms and think it is antigay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to importune straight males, including children.

 Many gays are single minded sexual predators fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When it comes to the old or ugly, gays are the real queerbashers. Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.

 Relationships between gay men don´t usually last very long. They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The cheating ratio of married´ gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%.

 Even friendships are based on the sexual test and hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let alone a lover.

Is there any doubt that this behavior is sick? I feel no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to get better and I don´t want it to spread.

Unfortunately, even the authors of this book are deceiving themselves. They claim that it is the gay lifestyle and NOT gay sexuality that is the pits. Who are they kidding? The two are inseparable.

The authors of this book are public relations experts who believe that our problem is fundamentally one of bad image with straights. The book details a comprehensive public-relations campaign that should go a long way towards sanitizing our very unsanitary image:

Jamming: Advertising that equates fear of gays with hatred of Jews, Blacks and women.

Conversion: Presenting images of gays that look like regular folks. The image must be the icon of normality.

They say it makes no difference that the ads are lies because we are using them to counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies.

This book was written in 1989 and obviously a campaign similar to this has taken effect. Read what the authors say about it:

By Conversion, we mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life [than subversion] We mean conversion of the average American´s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We mean to turn their hatred into warm regard whether they like it or not. (153)

Thus gays want Americans to learn that something they naturally and justifiably regard as sick, is in fact healthy. Thus Americans will be defenseless to resist their importunities whether in parks, barracks, bathrooms or classrooms.

It is a measure of the authors´ cynicism and self-deception that THEY quote psychologist M. Scott Peck, who in People of the Lie characterizes people who suffer from malignant narcissism simply as evil.

Evil people, Peck says, have an unshakable will to be right and will not consider the possibility that they are wrong Their main weapon, interestingly enough is the lie with which they distort reality to look good to themselves, and to confuse others. (297)

Gays can continue to fool themselves. But let us not. Some of these people are evil. Their behavior is sick. And it´s contagious.

Remember learning how some organisms use lysosomes (AKA 'suicide sacs') to destroy themselves to prevent defective DNA from being passed to subsequent generations? Homosexuality sounds like an excellent way for higher organisms to do the same thing, hasten the death of the current organism while preventing the defective DNA from being passed on. This isn't a defense of the disputed 'gay gene' theory, but a suggestion that other defects are being targetted.

Any society that attempts to normalize such perversions is probably detonating its own 'suicide sacs.'

Just about every reputable psychologist in the world disagrees with the assumption that homosexuality is a perversion.

This point might actually carry some weight if it weren't for the downright heavy-handed way that the APA operates. If you ever read about how homosexuality was taken off of the list of treatable mental disorders, you'll see that it was not that psychologists were discovering that, but instead that homosexuals themselves got into positions of enough authority to push through the changes in policy.

By saying that "just about every reputable psychologist" has a certain point of view about homosexuality turns out to be a circular argument. If they disagree with the official APA position, then they are not reputable -- even if their research is impeccable.

Face it, there are many things that you cannot say in this country and many things that you cannot even research without a large part of society coming down with their full force on you.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.