I'd like to stress that this is a huge spoiler that if true would have major implications upon the plot of the new 007 movie, Skyfall. Update: Trailer attached with Men In Black 3.

Follow nailbiter111:

By nailbiter111 - 4/6/2012

Update:.Daily Mail - "Sony took delivery of the trailer for the 23rd Bond film, Skyfall, earlier in the week. It will be attached to all the prints of Men In Black III, which comes out here on May 25."

The website Best For Films is reporting a spoiler that should not be taken lightly. This is your last chance to walk away from the article. If you'd still like to view the information just scroll down past the image and highlight the white text.

This was a scenario that has been speculated upon in the past when rumors of Ralph Fiennes becoming the next M surfaced a few months back. Skyfall, Craig's third outing as James Bond will be released on October 26, 2012. Daniel Craig will be joined by Javier Bardem, Ralph Fiennes, as well as a Judi Dench as M.

DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) and "safe harbor" provisions. CBM will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please contact us for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. You may also learn more about our copyright and trademark policies HERE.

2

Think this article is front page worthy? Click on the "thumbs up" to the right! Popular articles will appear on the homepage automatically!

What gets me about the Bond movies is when they cast a new Bond hes like 35 or 38. And they get 2 movies out of the guy and then he's too old looking and they have to start over. Connery was like 30 when he was cast though he looked much older, but they got quite a few years out of him. As for Roger Moore, he looked too old in the last 3 he did but they went with him too long. In View to a Kill he looked like he an elderly man. Craig already looks much too old for the part.

I don't think D. Craig is looking too old, its just how they look without make up. He looks great for his age, and is always in his best shape as Bond. Plus, I think its because Craig has that mature look why he is the only Bond to rock the short hair, giving him a younger tougher look.

Last time I checked Bond wasn't immortal and he didn't have the infinity formula, he was perfectly human. So I think he allowed to age. Bond's meant to be a man not some twilighty hearthrob. Long as Craig stays in shape let the guy lay the character as long as he physically can.

I predicted that since the moment i heard Mendes was attached to the project. Either Bond has to kill M (she has betrayed the organization) or Bardem kills her (Bardem will be working for the real villain, Fiennes--Blofeld in disguise), but I figured M would have to go this time around. Most likely Fiennes is going to take over M16 as a result, and at the end, be revealed to be Blofeld, leader of Quantum or whatever. Fiennes will have Bardem killed at the end after Bond captures him, and Bardem will realize he's been betrayed by the man he trusted as his boss.

@PatientZero you do realise Craigs version is more or less a reboot, hell any time a new bond is choosen the series gets a soft reboot so trying to piece together the continuity might be kinda futile my friend.

And after Craig is done Fass"schlong"bender as Bond FTW. I mean the 1st half first class was essentially his audition tape for the role.

eh...one good bond film, one bad film so there's nothing at stake for me here personally. The only other Bond films i watched were Goldfinger and The Man with the Golden Gun (just because Christopher lee is so awesome in everything he does).

@Hellsing If Craig were auditioning for Bond at his age 44 and looking like hes 52 as he does he wouldnt get the part. Craig is simply too old for the part now. If he had gotten the role @ 30 they couldve used him more. They cast him in his late 30's. So he began at the age were he or others should be exiting the role. If however they want to have Bond grow old, then the character should be written as a guy past his prime not in it. Years of that life would be catching up to him big time at 40+ years. Like a pro athlete he would be having severe problems with past injuries, reflexes would be slower. In a life and death job like that, as depicted in the movies, he'd get killed because of that.

there really are some moronic comments that i had to delete. once you click on the article that says spoiler warning you can't complain about how the spoiler is revealed in the article. to bitch about after you hit the button is STUPID. no if ands or buts about it.

And when you know a spoiler is in the article, you don't scroll down to see the full article. you slowly scroll down cautiously, thus avoiding a spoilery image which is set well below the text that needs to be highlighted. duh