Hmm. It is an interesting idea. Sadly, i don't believe that it is feasible to keep our candidates in place on a disjoined collective movement with no central command so-to speak.

That’s a bit like admitting our regional, branch and group organisers are not up to the job, have no initiative with a sheep mentality and will all fall apart quite quickly should the leader be jailed.

I think our hardworking organisers and people are well up to the job and without any further direction from party HQ from now till May the 4th the BNP would still go on to stand a record number of candidates in the 2006 local elections.

Try and be a bit more positive in your outlook as everyone is not so self-defeatist and despondent.

That’s a bit like admitting our regional, branch and group organisers are not up to the job, have no initiative with a sheep mentality and will all fall apart quite quickly should the leader be jailed.

I think our hardworking organisers and people are well up to the job and without any further direction from party HQ from now till May the 4th the BNP would still go on to stand a record number of candidates in the 2006 local elections.

Try and be a bit more positive in your outlook as everyone is not so self-defeatist and despondent.

Many would indeed have the initiative, however, human nature is such that many candidates would simply feel - no party - what is the point.

I am not talking about organisers, i'm reffering to your point about candidates.
I simply don't think there is a better option than simply re-naming ourselves overnight and continuing forward. To start talking about hundreds of candidates standing independently would probably not happen. It is just a fact of life, there has to be structure.

It's a small chance.. It would be a very very problamatic/costly move by any Government. I dont think they will , but they do wan't to stop the BNP gaining electroral sucess so every dirty underhand trick in the book will be pulled out and used against us. They thought The Secret Agent would do the trick lol Nick Griffin the night they screened it on Newsnight reveresd the effect and gained more BNP Voters by it. And a huge vote.

In the first posting on this thread it states that the show, "The Secret Agent The Sequel" will be broadcast in July, the next round of local elections are on May the 4th, how damaging is this supposed to be if shown after the event?

I'm also certain that if there is a BBC-government reporter/plant he or she will appear outside the court at Nick and Marks trial. This would be where probaly many press cameras would be on show..and ideal footage gathering oppotunity for the BBC. So I sugget vigilance is needed then as well...

In the first posting on this thread it states that the show, "The Secret Agent The Sequel" will be broadcast in July, the next round of local elections are on May the 4th, how damaging is this supposed to be if shown after the event?

Maybe it is that they don't have anything solid in the show and that they want to hype it up before the elections so that people will assume that they are bad and not vote.
No one wants to vote for someone then find out a month later that they don't like them - or more likely that their pals don't like them.

In the first posting on this thread it states that the show, "The Secret Agent The Sequel" will be broadcast in July, the next round of local elections are on May the 4th, how damaging is this supposed to be if shown after the event?

The programme shown in July will not damage the 2006 local elections, but a ban or even just the negative publicity following say a torrid time in court with all the media hype this month would.

Just be prepared for anything is the bottom line and expose and root out the fifth column.