Speaking the Truth Is Now a Revolutionary Act Filled With Deadly Consequences

Assistant Attorney General of the United States, John Carlin.

Some people “get it”, most of the country remains clueless regarding the unmistakable declaration by Assistant Attorney General Carlin as he has promised to pursue domestic terrorists, some of which are only guilty of disagreeing with the government. For a review of Carlin’s intentions, please click here and be prepared to be horrified as Carlin expressed disdain for due process when prosecuting criminals and as he criminalized free speech criticism of the government. .

The only remaining question is whether or not, Carlin and his lackeys will have any trouble recruiting henchman if, and when, the time arrives. In the field of psychology, we have a pair of landmark experiments which clearly demonstrate that Carlin will have no trouble recruiting the next generation of storm-troopers and death camp personnel. The two experiments are referred to as the Milgram Experiment and the Zimbardo Prison Study. The results are shocking and have a clear link to Carlin’s expressed desire to prosecute people hold anti-government views as he places American dissenters in the same category of offenders as the KKK and people who blow up buildings and carry out school shootings.

My fears for the future of law enforcement in this country are expressed in the following email I received after publishing yesterday’s article.

Dear Mr. Hodges

I read your article about the Attorney General’s intent to ignore the American constitution and persecute people for simply disagreeing with the government. All the things you written about martial law and Fema camps are covered by what Carlin wants to do with us. I hate what this administration has done to America and because I hate it and talk about it, I am not a target of the government. If I knew how to leave this condemned country I would. We are Godless and deserve our fate.

Where is the outrage from the America people? Why aren’t we rioting over this? It seems like we have been sentenced to jail and nobody cares. What is wrong with us? Your article made it so clear. I am scared to death of this government. I am 65 years old and this is not the country that I was raised in. God help my children and grandchildren.

Thanks for what you are doing, but I don’t think many are listening or even care. We are so lost as a nation.

Laura Miller

According to the research, there will be no shortage of participants when Carlin begins to persecute government dissenters.

The Milgram Experiment and Group Think

The world of psychological research provides the definitive answer as to whether we should fear our military in the coming storm ahead in the form of a phenomenon called group think. Group think is often described as a decision-making process whereby the group members go along with what they believe is the consensus. Group think has also been used to describe individual acquiescence to authority even when the authority has limited power to enforce compliance. Group think often causes groups to make hasty, irrational decisions, where individual doubts are set aside, for fear of upsetting the group’s leadership and balance.

Just how far will people go to please authority figures and subsequently do what they know to be immoral? The first known laboratory test for groupthink occurred in 1963 by Yale professor, Stanley Milgram. Subjects for this landmark study were recruited for the Yale study through newspaper ads and direct mail. The participants were men between the ages of 20 and 50, from all educational backgrounds, ranging from an elementary school dropout to participants with doctoral degrees.

Milgram wanted to determine what percentage of people would willingly administer enough progressive electric shocks which would result in death simply based on the orders of a perceived authority figure (i.e., the experimenter).

There were three participants in the experiment:

1. The Teacher was the real subject in the experiment. Their role was to administer shocks for each wrong answer provided by the learner. How far would they go, was the true subject of the experiment. Would they actually kill a person for failing to provide the correct answer on a word pair test? Would they mindlessly follow the orders of the experimenter to continue with the abuse, regardless of the results and obvious harm being perpetrated upon the pretend victim in the experiment?

2. The second participant, the Learner, was actually a plant in the experiment. The Learner would sit in an adjacent room and pretend to be shocked for each wrong answer that they would purposely give. Eventually, they would cry out for help and beg the Teacher to stop administering the electric shocks. Their cries included pleas of mercy that were often based on an unknown level of self-expressed cardiac distress that they were pretending to experience.

3. The Experimenter was a stern looking fellow who carried a clipboard, wore a lab coat, and would urge the Teacher to continue regardless of the make believe pleas of the Learner.

The “Teachers” were told by the experimenter that they would be participating in an experiment to test the effects of punishment on learning. However, as has already been stated, this was not the goal of the experiment.

The “Teacher” was given a list of word pairs which was used to teach the Learner. The Learner was actually a confederate, or a plant, in the experiment. The Teacher would then read the first word of each pair and read four possible answers. The Learner would deliberately press the wrong button to indicate his response. Since the answer was incorrect, the Learner would receive an electric shock, with the voltage progressively increasing with each wrong answer. Therefore, the
subjects believed that for each wrong answer, the Learner was receiving an ever increasing level of actual shocks which would eventually result in death.

In reality, there were no shocks. After the confederate (i.e., Learner) was separated from the subject, the confederate set up a tape recorder integrated with the electro-shock generator, which played pre-recorded sounds of pain and distress for each successive level of shock. After a number of voltage level increases, the Learner would bang on the wall which divided him from the subject (teacher). After several instances of banging on the wall and complaining about his heart condition, the learner provided no further responses to questions and no further complaints. The fate of the Learner was left to the imagination of the teacher. The silence was met with the command to continue with the experiment. Although the Learner was not being harmed, the Teacher believed that they were administering progressively dangerous shocks. From the instrumentation panel, the Teacher could clearly see that their shocks were approaching the level of lethality. Was the Teacher being forced to capitulate and continue with the experiment? Quite the contrary was true, the prompts to continue administering shock were encouraged by minimal prompts and absolutely no threats were offered by the Experimenter.

If at any time the subject hesitated or expressed a desire to discontinue the experiment, the subject was given a planned and verbatim succession of verbal prompts by the experimenter:

1. “Please continue.”

2. “The experiment requires that you continue.”

3. “It is absolutely essential that you continue. ”

4. “You have no other choice, you must go on.”

If the Teacher still wished to stop after having listened to four successive verbal prompts, the experiment was discontinued. Otherwise, the experiment was terminated after the subject had administered the lethal 450-volt shock three times in succession.

Milgram expected that less than one percent would actually administer a fatal electric shock. The actual results were so stunning that he decided to film the results on the final day, fearing that nobody would believe his results. And what were the results? Despite expressing some measure of discomfort and the minimal use pressure, in Milgram’s first set of experiments, 65% (26 out of 40) of the subjects administered the experiment’s final and hypothetically fatal 450-volt shock. Amazingly, no participant steadfastly refused to give further shocks before the 300-volt level!

Milgram’s results were confirmed when Dr. Thomas Blass performed a meta-analysis on the results of repeated performances of the experiment. Blass found that the percentage of participants who were willing to administer fatal voltages remains remarkably constant, between 61% and 66%.

The results of Milgram’s and Blass’ work are stunning in their final conclusion which demonstrated that almost two-thirds of all Americans will mindlessly follow the commands of a “perceived” authority figure even when the authority figure has no real power over the people. Can you imagine how the 65% rate will dramatically climb when they authority figure had “real” power over the people being ordered to fire upon American citizens?

Put a Nazi Uniform On a Person and They Will Act Like a Nazi: The Zimbardo Prison Study

In 1971, psychologistPhilip Zimbardo and his colleagues set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. Zimbardo, a former classmate of Stanley Milgram was interested in expanding upon Milgram’s research. He wanted to further investigate the impact of situational variables on human behavior.

The research question the researchers asked was how would the participants react when placed in a simulated prison environment? Zimbardo had previously speculated that, “Suppose you had only kids who were normally healthy, psychologically and physically, and they knew they would be going into a prison-like environment and that some of their civil rights would be sacrificed. Would those good people, put in that bad, evil place, or, would their goodness triumph?” The results of the experiment haunt many of us in the psychology field, today, as we ponder how far would Americans go in the enforcement of a brutal and vicious tyranny?

Zimbardo set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University’s psychology building, and then selected 24 undergraduate students to play the roles of both prisoners and guards. The assignment of roles was accomplished through random selection. The participants were selected because they had no criminal background, lacked psychological issues and had no major medical conditions. Therefore, the participants in the study were far more psychologically and physically healthy than any group of modern day military force, police force or FEMA camp guards. The volunteers agreed to participate for a one- to two-week period.

Prisoners were to remain in the mock prison 24-hours a day for the duration of the study. Guards, on the other hand, were assigned to work in three-man teams for eight-hour shifts. After each shift, guards were allowed to return to their homes until their next shift. Researchers were able to observe the behavior of the prisoners and guards through the use of hidden cameras.

The experiment was originally scheduled to last two weeks, but it had to be stopped after just six days due to what was happening to the student participants. The guards became exceptionally abusive and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress, anxiety and nervous breakdown.

The prisoners and guards were allowed to behave in any manner they chose. However, the interactions were generally hostile or even dehumanizing. The guards began behaving in an aggressive and abusive manner toward the mock prisoners. Subsequently, nearly all of the prisoners became passive and depressed. Five of the prisoners began to experience such severe and acute anxiety, that they had to be released from the study early.

Zimbardo later wrote in his book The Lucifer Effect that “Only a few people were able to resist the situational temptations to yield to power and dominance while maintaining some semblance of morality and decency; obviously I was not among that noble class” . Even Zimbardo lost his objectivity and the experiment was only halted when his girl friend at the time, Christina Maslach, a graduate psychology student, voiced objections and threatened to break off her relationship with Zimbardo if the experiment continued.

The Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior. Because the guards were placed in a position of power, they began to behave in ways they would not normally act in their everyday lives or in other situations. By putting a prison guard uniform on the participants, issuing sun glasses and a baton made the participant guards act in accordance with their perceived role. This has dire consequences for the ability of uniformed personnel to resist orders from their commanding officers to fire upon American citizens. People will act according to the role that they have been assigned to play.

Based upon the Zimbardo Prison Experiment, what kind of treatment could you expect at a FEMA camp?

Conclusion

It is clear that despots like Carlin will have little difficulty in obtaining the help he needs to fulfill his agenda of criminalizing free speech protesting against the government. Will American soldiers fire upon Americans in times of civil unrest? The evidence has been presented to you, what do you now believe?

What will you use for tender if the dollar collapses in a World War III scenario?

From my observations, the best thing we can do at this point is continue to help our family, friends and neighbors and hope that they get it. It has taken me years to explain the hidden facts behind 9-11 to my family but they knew I was on to the Kennedy thing (and Hitler) as well. I can see the present day “false flag” events as clear as a desert moon with a clear sky with no population for dozens of miles away. I also see what you are saying in your articles. You know, oddly ~ I happened upon your site when I simply was looking to find out what was going wrong with the financial systems. It was then I was confirmed that we are in a spiritual event combined with a luciferian objective that is going to be fulfilled whether we like it or not.

I have a very strong past and am doing what I can do to reveal what is going on to others. I am, however, telling you one thing right now Amigo ~ we are not going to stop what is coming. That is why we need to focus on those who can at least see a glimpse or a shadow of what it is that is encircling them. Nothing is going to pull us out of this and if Trump thinks he can do it without having his life taken away. . .well ~ that shows me he’s either one of the most caring persons on the planet or he has his own agenda. But quite frankly, I like his agenda better than that of the despot that is presently residing in the White House. I’ll leave it at that.

The objective is most certainly not to spread panic. It is the focus on revealing the closest known truths and getting people psychologically prepared for the changes that are going to occur. Your articles simply cannot be given to those with miniscule degrees of understanding or they won’t even bother reading them. It is up to your readers to gain the trust of those around them and pull them onboard.

It’s too late to educate. Think of how long it took you to put the pieces together. During the time you were doing that you remained silent so as to not destroy your friendships and career. Then. . .you reached a point (with John McCain) where you had to take action. Then. . .you kept learning more, and more. . .you get my drift? Now you are so advanced from those who haven’t taken the plunge that they can’t figure you out. You’ve got to get your readers to take action. We’re on the last turn in this road.

Peace be with you ~

The Nomad **

Joe
October 18, 2015 at 8:04 am

Yeah, this is concerning. What happened to all the talk about our heroic veterans who fought for our freedom, yet here we are with a military that is poised to target what the administration calls ‘domestic terrorists/constitutionalists’?! No questions asked, they’re going to follow orders? Our FBI knows the criminality of the politicians, this plot was revealed by their informant in the 80s on that bill ayers/weather underground infiltration. Why is everyone silent on this?

pj
October 18, 2015 at 9:53 am

I did a search on John Carlin and I found that the speech you and CNN cite was co-sponsored by the SPLC so we know who this guy really works for. Carlin was also one of the prosecutors in the fake Boston Marathon bombing trial.

As expected from any SPLC lackey his main target is white Americans-here’s a quote from the speech, “The Justice Department identified white supremacists as the most violent of the domestic terror groups…” which we all know is quite a stretch. And of course he mentions Dylan Roof whom many believe was an actor playing a role in yet another fake terrorist attack. You can also be sure Carlin is cheerleading the recent arrests on terrorism charges of those Confederate flag supporters in Georgia who may have been disorderly but are far from terrorists.

Search this to read the full speech: Assistant Attorney General John P. Carlin Delivers Remarks on Domestic Terrorism at an Event Co-Sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center and the George Washington University Center for Cyber and Homeland Security’s Program on Extremism

barebones
October 18, 2015 at 11:46 am

You are addressing some of my favorite psychological experiments!!

re: Milgram – Most elegant experiment. It was designed to test peoples reaction to authority. The best part is that it was scalable. By adding an anti-authority figure “Teacher” acquiescence was significantly diminished. Conversely, by adding a second authority, participation exceeded 90%! Some rock group even composed a song about it. Interestingly, regardless of sex, culture, or race the response was statistically identical. Some of the “Teachers” did experience remorse after applying the terminal shock. The experiment had nothing to do with “Group Think”, that was a different elegant experiment by a Polish psychologist Solomon Asch.

re: Solomon Asch – The purpose of the experiment was to see how someone, when placed in a group, would respond to an invalid conclusion supported by the remainder of the group. In the experiment the “group” was composed of “plants”. I don’t remember the exact figures, but the “testee”, even though knowing better, would usually cave and agree with the group’s conclusion(s). …..Not every jury has a Jessica Fletcher or a Monk; think about that!

re: Philip Zimbardo – If you think, not even too carefully, it becomes evident that the form of the not very elegant experiment was just a more elaborate Milgram. The most important conclusion extracted from this experiment is, that the experimenter should not be part of the experiment. Zimbardo appointed himself the “Warden” of the “Prison”. The experiment quickly got out of his control. It was terminated only after a severe scolding by his girl friend, one of his grad students, made him aware of the terrible consequences of continuing!

Taxdn2poverty
October 18, 2015 at 12:13 pm

@Joe: As a veteran myself, I am glad someone besides me has finally figured this part of the scenario out too. In my little war, almost a half century ago now, there was always talk, some serious, of returning to the States and killing all the protesters. You are also correct when you realize that our illustrious veterans, those ever vigilant defenders of freedom, will gladly kill the taxpayers that have been supporting them. If this is not a fact, then why are they at this very minute training to do just that: Kill you and I because we disagree with a malicious and destructive government.

Seen2013
October 18, 2015 at 12:17 pm

In military branches, it is referred to as ‘little Caesar powers’ or was back during the Vietnam era.

Little Caesar powers were granted through delegation to lower ranks who literally assumed greater antimony than should have.

What happened is, the ranking officer delegated authorities to a few selected ranking officers who then had their supporters run over the lower ranks. Because the authorities were delegate like per say prescribed medicine, the higher ranking officers’ hands were tied because they had delegated and thus was a reflection upon their commands leading to more than a few issues.
One of those issues ties into sexual predatory actions as the little Caesar and his goons had the authority backing of the ranking officers who delegated those authorities to them to begin with.
Those higher ranking officers also happened to often turn out to be Military politicians even though few if any actual action is ever taken.
To put it simply, people get caught up in the image of an event rather than the event itself. Lets begin with the criminal arrests and the drop in crime.
Establishment politicians argue that their policies are succeeding after making like 100+ arrests that are largely and suspiciously low-level or otherwise ‘expendable assets’.
As far as political expediency goes, it is as old as ‘hey look behind you’ or ‘hey, what’s that’…

It gets worse. The people who will be filling those facilities are people who are very angry, and their entire survival by guidelines mandates obedience to authority. They are also predominantly people who won’t look deeper at an image or event, and they are the ones who will be granted ‘Little Caesar Powers’.

If history is any guide:
First, they come for the dissidents who would speak out.
Then, they come for the undesirables, and those who aren’t undesirable won’t say a word.
Then, they come for you, and you’re up a creek without a paddle because of your own Apathy.

Apathy is essential to Godwin’s Law.

jon
October 18, 2015 at 2:03 pm

You did not mention one experiment. The wave experiment. A teacher was able to brainwash his class into becoming Nazi like very quickly. He used a wave symbol instead of a swastika. They made a movie about it. Crazy stuff.

Hi Dave,
I have education and training in the field of Behavioral Health. While the experiments you site are disturbing indeed, what recently has me literally on my knees in prayer is the recent published results that indicate magnetic energy can affect a person’s preception of God, or change a person’s perception of immigration (see link below).

Knowing that what is “published” only scratches the surface of what is already established, combined with what you are saying here in this article? Imagine the ability to send magnitized energy pulses to hit the brains of the military (which many are already RFID chipped anyway) . . then YIKES zombie apoclypse. . . . Add then, the koolaid stupor of most U.S. citizens, who could have a dull electromagnetic suggestion to go along with the marching orders to FEMA camp. . . Add to that the MK Ultra minions who could be cued up enmasse, along with the alley-hack-bar brigades . . . insanity and chaos abound.

Where’s the hope? ONLY in Christ Jesus, for the Bible tells us in Ephesians 6 that we must put on the Full Armour of God. The new technology gives greater understanding of “the Helmet of Salvation” . . a literal dimensional protection against these luciferian fallen angel technologies.

Blessings to you. . .and prayers DAILY going up for you. Thank you for what you do.

As an outsider looking in at the current state of the USA my opinion is that the tyranny will continue and the public will continue to let it happen. You are already a police state but most people just don’t care or refuse to believe that. They brought in the TSA knowone stopped it, they continue to arm the wrong people knowone stops them they pass an illegal law on same sex marriage and most people cheered for them, and the biggest whopper of all they vote in a text book narsasist as president not once but twice. After saying all that i know there are people that care about these things and are trying to warn others, but my feeling is even when they start arresting people the only ones that will say anything are the ones being arrested and the others won;t care. Just like what happened in Europe 75 years ago when the public didn;t stop them until it was to late. I write this not to be negative and tell you there is no hope but to make you see that the chance of a bloodless coup is very minimal giving the current status, peoples lack of will to get out in the street and actually protest. There is no political solution to a spiritual problem and there is a dark cloud over the USA that has a hold on the people in power.

Mike
October 18, 2015 at 3:36 pm

Another thought to consider is Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs being met for those wearing the uniform… Mike S. MAFC

BTRUTH
October 18, 2015 at 4:27 pm

The common denominator for those two “experiments” were that none of the participants were walking with Jesus Christ & seeking His Almighty face. The godless will do, what the godless are. Shalom

barebones
October 18, 2015 at 4:29 pm

You are addressing some of my favorite psychological experiments!!

re: Milgram – Most elegant experiment. It was designed to test peoples reaction to authority. The best part is that it was scalable. By adding an anti-authority figure “Teacher” acquiescence was significantly diminished. Conversely, by adding a second authority, participation exceeded 90%! Some rock group even composed a song about it. Interestingly, regardless of sex culture, or race the response was statistically identical. Some of the “Teachers” did experience remorse after applying the terminal shock. The experiment had nothing to do with “Group Think”, that was a different elegant experiment by a Polish psychologist Solomon Asch.

re: Solomon Asch – The purpose of the experiment was to see how someone, when placed in a group, would respond to an invalid conclusion supported by the remainder of the group. In the experiment the “group” was composed of “plants”. I don’t remember the exact figures, but the “testee”, even though knowing better, would usually cave and agree with the group’s conclusion(s). …..Not every jury has a Jessica Fletcher or a Monk; think about that!

re: Philip Zimbardo – If you think, not even too carefully, it becomes evident that the form of the not very elegant experiment was just a more elaborate Milgram. The most important conclusion extracted from this experiment is, that the experimenter should not be part of the experiment. Zimbardo appointed himself the “Warden” of the “Prison”. The experiment quickly got out of his control. It was terminated only after a severe scolding by his girl friend, one of his grad students, made him aware of the terrible consequences of continuing!

Max
October 19, 2015 at 4:58 am

This guy carlin is a real plutocrat.. a real stick in the mud. I could only imagine what his name sake the late great GEORGE would say about him and his nefarious ways!

wb
October 19, 2015 at 10:21 am

if you are white, believe the bible is the word of God, support the 2nd amendment and own a gun, vote and live as a conservative, belong to any group now considered anti-government, and have criticized this administration over the past 6 years, then you are an enemy of the state.

Eli Rides
October 21, 2015 at 3:39 pm

Yes, but the Truth is coming anyway.
Check out this timely revealation,
‘The Flat Earth Conspiracy’ by Eric Dubay.
This book contains more truth than most folks ever had in one sitting. You can find more about the Biggest Lie ever told by typing it into youtube.
Blessings, the King of Truth is coming. Is your name written in the Book of Life?