Explanation of the
nature of negative, dark energy, and dark matter.
July 05 , 2017

Although contemporary cosmology and physics allow the mass to be pushed
into the singularity (dimensionless point) in the center of black
holes, it still doesn't understand that mass in such a state loses the
quality of matter. Matter, being a substance and field, is the energy
distributed in space. If we take away space from energy, it then
changes to a different quality, to pure energy. Today it is often
called the negative, dark energy, causing the expansion of the universe.

I describe the change of mass (substance and field), that is, the
energy distributed in space, to pure (negative, dark) energy.

Dark matter behaves exactly as if roughly the same universes as ours
existed in other, hidden dimensions, gravitationally acting upon each
other. For example, "behind our" galaxy there are other ones, and so at
galaxy level/galactic cluster level, gravity is "stronger" than at star
level, because all universes are just as thin as ours. Therefore, it is
unlikely that stars of universes in other dimensions are found in a
"site with gravitational relation" to our Sun, but on the other hand,
it is very likely and legitimate that there are other galaxies in other
dimensions in a "site with gravitational relation" to our galaxy.

Negative, dark energy (pure energy) is energy released from a
singularity, for example from the Big Bang. A small part of it had
transformed into matter and radiation (that is, energy distributed in
space), which causes the expansion of the universe to be hindered by
gravity. The rest of the negative, dark (pure) energy causes the
expansion of the universe (we could figuratively say that it is
"explosion energy"). Because "Gray Objects" are created in the midst of
older galaxies, mass in their singularities is extinguished into pure
energy; we can directly say that dark energy, and thus the energy of
the universe's expansion is growing and therefore the universe is
expanding rapidly. All this takes place in all dimensions of the
universe in a very similar manner, which also means in the universes of
other dimensions.

Since singularity is zero-dimensional (dimensionless), it is no longer
only part of our 3D universe, but it (and especially the energy in it)
belongs to the universe as a whole, and thus to the universes in all
dimensions. This is also true of Big Bang, which is also not just a
matter of our 3D universe, but of universes in all dimensions.
There are four basic interactions acting in the world around us.
Strong, electromagnetism, weak (I doubt that it's fundamental) and
gravity. We explain all the phenomena around us using these four
interactions.
Gravitation, however, significantly deviates from the other three by
its force effects. Gravity is about 30 orders weaker than the other
ones.

Therefore we suppose that the universe consists of more than three
spatial dimensions that we can perceive. Gravity is so weak because it
acts in all spatial dimensions. Thus, the gravitational force of an
object located in our three-dimensional space is comparable to other
interactions, but since it acts in more dimensions than 3 (in all of
them) and in our space, it is just a part of it and therefore it is so
weak.

In our three-dimensional space (or the four-dimensional time-space) we
still have a problem explaining the coherence of galaxies and galactic
clusters. Based on our calculations, the galaxies and galactic clusters
should fall apart (fly in pieces) because, according to the circulation
velocity of their objects, the centrifugal force should be greater than
the coherent gravitational force caused in them by mass.

It is believed that they are held together by what we call "dark
matter," which acts with additional gravity. It is not a matter we
cannot see because it does not emit light or is not illuminated, or
because it is "black". It is supposed to be matter (particles) that
interacts with our world only in gravitational terms and in no other
way.
I assume that dark matter is normal matter (normal material objects) in
other spatial dimensions than our three. These objects also act with
their gravity in our space, just like "our" objects act with their
gravity in other, yet inaccessible dimensions.

After the Big Bang, universes were created in several dimensions. Mass
clustered together after the infiltration phase. However, if we assume
multidimensional gravitational effects, this clustering did not occur
separately in individual universes, but in gravitational synergy. Thus,
there are probably other galaxies in other universes "beyond" our
galaxy. Going forward, we will use the term "gravitationally related
site".

But why are there no other stars in other universes acting with
noticeable gravity upon our Solar System in a gravitationally related
site of our Sun? It is due to the fact that even universes in other
dimensions are just as thin as ours and the star has a negligible
influence (practically none) on the shape of the galaxy and the
arrangement of the other stars in it. The star simply has to be there
and move how the galaxy determines as a whole. This also applies to the
relation of a galaxy – group of galaxies, unless a certain
galaxy is incomparably larger than the others. In that case, the big
one (for example, ours) can be determinative regarding the movement of
the others.

This could create an interesting, hypothetical design. Our galaxy is
large. At its gravitationally related site, there may be small galaxies
in a universe in another dimension, orbiting a common center of
gravity. The local cosmologist may be wondering why these small
galaxies in their universe do not fly into the cosmos since they do not
have enough mass to keep themselves in such orbits. The local
cosmologist is wondering why our galaxy does not fly into pieces and
must mentally project the "hoop" of the gravitational action of dark
matter.
But a multidimensional cosmologist sees that the gravitationally
related site of our galaxy is at the center of gravity, orbited by
those small galaxies and that the "hoop" of gravitational action around
our galaxy is created by the gravity of the small ones.

There is one more thing related to this issue. The theory of multiverse
usually presupposes an infinite number of universes. I do not suppose
this, and I think that the number of dimensions is infinite, but the
number of universes is finite. Even if there was an infinite number of
universes, only those universes that are similar to our universe in
terms of gravitational action are relevant for the multidimensional
gravitational action (explanation of dark matter). I suppose that there
is a different distance from the gravitational view between universes
of different dimensions.