Miller, who was forced to resign this week by President Obama, said he didnt believe the scrutiny was illegal even as he apologized for the IRSs actions, which have turned into a political storm for the White House.

He also admitted under questioning from House Ways and Means Committee members that facts could emerge that might change whether he thinks anyone in the agency committed a crime, and he said one staffer involved in the extra scrutiny was reassigned and another received counseling.

Facing tense, and at times hostile, questions from GOP lawmakers at the first congressional hearing on the IRS controversy, Miller said the screening process the IRS used was obnoxious and called the customer service the agency offered horrible.

Miller stressed that the extra attention happened because IRS officials faced an avalanche of applications for tax-exempt status.

But he also pushed back on GOP lawmakers who said the IRS was targeting conservatives, calling that a loaded statement.

Asked if the IRS's actions had been illegal, he responded: I dont believe it is.

He then added of the behavior: I dont believe it should happen.

Millers answers have not sit well with GOP lawmakers throughout Fridays hearing, and his comments fly in the face of top Republicans like Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), who have said that agency staffers should be jailed.

Republicans on Friday accused the acting IRS chief of lying to them about the extra scrutiny given to conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. Miller found out about that special attention more than a year ago but declined to tell lawmakers.

At the start of Fridays committee hearing, Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) rattled off several different violations he believes the IRS committed.

Camp also linked the IRS uproar to what he called a culture of cover-ups and political intimidation in this administration, an apparent reference to last years attack in Benghazi, Libya, and the Justice Departments subpoena of reporter records.

This systemic abuse cannot be fixed with just one resignation, Camp said. And, as much as I expect more people need to go, the reality is this is not a personnel problem. This is a problem of the IRS being too large, too powerful, too intrusive and too abusive of honest, hardworking taxpayers.

But Republicans on the panel have also expressed frustration throughout the hearing at Millers sometimes feisty answers, with the acting chief maintaining that he did not lie to them.

You're not going to cooperate with me, Mr. Miller, and you've been uncooperative in this hearing, Rep. Dave Reichert (R-Wash.) told the IRS official.

Democrats acknowledged that the IRS had made serious mistakes and generally agreed with Millers statements that agency officials did not target Tea Party and conservative groups for political reasons.

What I'm trying to point out, and basically to debunk, is the notion or idea the political statements  and, I believe, nonfactual statements by Chairman Camp  to link these scandals to the White House, said Rep. Joe Crowley (N.Y.), a member of House Democratic leadership.

Democrats also stressed repeatedly that the Doug Shulman, who was IRS commissioner when the targeting took place, was nominated by former President George W. Bush. And several said that the major issue was the cloudy regulations guiding which groups should be granted tax-exempt status.

Miller is testifying along with Russell George, the Treasury inspector general whose report details what he called ineffective management at the agency.

Georges report found that the IRS asked for excessive information from conservative groups, including donor lists and whether group leaders wanted to run for public office. The IRS also applied inconsistent principles when deciding which groups to give extra screening, the report said, leading some groups to wait months or years for approval.

According to the inspector generals report, Lois Lerner, the IRS official who first disclosed the targeting, found out in June 2011. Lerner pushed for the screening guidelines to be changed, but other IRS officials eventually went around her to change them again.

Georges report also says that IRS staffers assert that lower-level employees crafted the screening process and that they were not influenced by any outside group.

Miller on Friday acknowledged that Lerners disclosure of the IRS targeting last Friday came from a planted question.

Camp had said in his opening statement that he was interested in hearing why the IRS targeting occurred and why the agency kept it secret for so long, who started the extra scrutiny, and when President Obama and his administration found out.

But in a hearing break, he told The Hill that he wasnt satisfied with the answers the panel was getting from Miller, a feeling shared by other Republicans.

On the one hand, youre arguing today that the IRS is not corrupt, said Rep. Peter Roskam (R-Ill.). But the subtext of that is you say, Look, were just incompetent. And I think it is a perilous pathway to go down.

The law violated is: http://www.osc.gov/documents/hatchact/federal/5cfr734.pdf

Subpart CProhibited Activities § 734.301 Exclusion from coverage.

This subpart does not apply to employees in the agencies and positions described in subpart D of this part.

§ 734.302 Use of official authority; prohibition.

(a) An employee may not use his or her official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election.

(b) Activities prohibited by paragraph

(a) of this section include, but are not limited to:

and

§ 734.305 Soliciting or discouraging the political participation of certain persons.

(a) An employee may not knowingly solicit or discourage the participation in any political activity of any person who has an application for any compensation grant, contract, ruling, license, permit, or certificate pending before the employees employing office.

(b) An employee may not knowingly solicit or discourage the participation in any political activity of any person who is the subject of, or a participant in, an ongoing audit, investigation, or enforcement action being carried out by the employees employing office.

(c) Each agency or instrumentality of the United States or District of Columbia Government shall determine when a matter is pending and ongoing within employing offices of the agency or instrumentality for the purposes of this part.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

7
posted on 05/17/2013 10:19:20 AM PDT
by xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)

This criminal act by the IRS was to sway voters away from Romney at the election. It was part of the huge conspiracy to destroy conservative Constitutionalists and to destroy our freedom. And it worked like all of King Obama and his communists Administration was working for. And a huge segment of voters supported the dictator King.

I think you, like other members who will post violations of ‘law’, show, again, that the Law is not made for those in D.C., but for We the People, whom they attempt to bleed ($$) dry.

There is no longer Equal Protection under the Law, there is no Constitution; we are a lawless Democracy on the way down to revolt, upheaval and despair. We are certainly over the ~200 yr run of those in the past.

18
posted on 05/17/2013 10:36:30 AM PDT
by i_robot73
(We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)

...Miller has served most of his 25 years at the IRS, an agency in the Treasury Department, in its Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (TE/GE).

Starting as special assistant to the assistant commissioner for Employee Plans and Exempt Organizations, Miller rose to acting assistant commissioner, then director of Exempt Organizations from 1999 to 2004, capping his TE/GE service as commissioner of TE/GE from 2004 to April 2009...

Steven Miller wasnt even acting commissioner during the time the targeting took place.

Did you not hear his lying evasive, deceitful responses?

Was it not obvious to you he's part of this choreographed corrupt government cover up?

Youre not paying attention. If Miller wasnt in charge at the time, then what exactly was the point of firing him.

Uh...Please direct your attention to the two sentences above. Once again, just a wild guess, but based strictly on his evasive deceptive responses, he's part of the cover up. If not, why in hell would his responses be evasive and deceptive?

Obviously, this AH is part of the coverup, and likely was fired as part of a diversionary tactic. It's might comes as a shock to you, but government is really good at this kind of thing.

This is not that complex.

38
posted on 05/17/2013 3:40:01 PM PDT
by dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)

You're not paying attention...Miller was fired as part of the coverup, to make ya think they were punishing the wrong doers. They should have fired the lady who was promoted to the ObamaCare department of the IRS. She was involved in the actual misdeeds at the critical times.

Hello? Are you talking about Ingram?

""Sarah Hall Ingram served as commissioner of the office responsible for tax-exempt organizations between 2009 and 2012. But Ingram has since left that part of the IRS and is now the director of the IRS Affordable Care Act office, the IRS confirmed to ABC News today.""

Her successor, Joseph Grant, is taking the fall for misdeeds at the scandal-plagued unit between 2010 and 2012. During at least part of that time, Grant served as deputy commissioner of the tax-exempt unit.

Grant announced today that he would retire June 3, despite being appointed as commissioner of the tax-exempt office May 8, a week ago.

You don't think all these people are involved?

You don't think they will depose and interrogate Ingram?

40
posted on 05/17/2013 4:12:03 PM PDT
by dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)

I have answered and posted about Miller all along. My point is, and always has been, that he’s not the one that should have been fired to get Obama off the media hook. As I’ve said again and again, he wasn’t in charge of either the IRS or the relevant department at the critical times.

48
posted on 05/18/2013 10:17:28 AM PDT
by xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.