Glad you asked but am surprised that you would ,considering your stats . I went and got another viid and at the end that question is posed ,
but without your word "completely" ...That word is a bait word :>) believing something to be completely true and trusting someone completely to be
telling you the truth are not the same thing . You have to be completely convinced yourself if you want to know the truth . Me telling you something
that is true but unrelated to the story or point I may be making is one of the best ways to get someone to agree . Then lay claim that you agreed with
me . Its a tactic the fake news use as well as others in making points to win arguments . just for the sake of winning or not loosing and the truth
does not matter then . eta ...this is the one I was looking for and the answer lies with the guy at the very end

here is a vid but its not exactly the one I wanted to find and that is the truth

What's sad is the George Logan action that caused the act made relations between France and US get a lot better(end embargo and release of US seamen),
something the government diplomats could not accomplish. What he accomplished was praised so much by the papers that Federalist in government created
the law to prevent themselves from being embarrassed in future.
Sounds familiar.

The only person indicted by this law was a kentucky farmer who was advocating separatism of western us territories and for these territories to ally
with france.

This is a law with no teeth, If you give this law teeth it could wrought some destruction on both parties, hello clintons.
Lets not even bring up people meeting and making policy at CFR, Davos, and attending bilderberg.

Fake news takes on different characteristics ..miss leading ,factually incorrect ,edited comments , miss quoted ,. the list is long and even using
blue or green screens . There is a ton of examples but CNN dominates it and claims its not us ...

Fake News is completely fabricated news. Not misleading, not factually incorrect, not biased.

CNN is not fake news. The websites created to push fabricated news to troll Right Wingers, are fake news.

I notice you didn't comment on any thing else in my post.

Why?

CNN is totally Fake News otherwise they wouldn't post ridiculous stuff like this

It may actually part of Trumps plan to do that .mmm In another thread I made about Trump destroying the Euro , something that looks like its
impossible to do because of a treaty involved inside the EU to regulate the value of the Euro . If Trump imposes sanctions on Iran and goes after the
EU to raise the value of the Euro then the EU would have priced themselves out of thew market with a over inflated currency . I am probably wrong
but what you say kind of makes sense if that law is going to be used as a economic weapon .

Fake News is completely fabricated news. Not misleading, not factually incorrect, not biased. CNN is not fake news. The websites created to push
fabricated news to troll Right Wingers, are fake news. I notice you didn't comment on any thing else in my post. Why?

Because that is your definition of fake news and you will be sticking with it .I am sure if I dug hard enough I could find a CNN definition
that wouldn't agree with yours but it would have to be one before they got called out and changed their policy ...which they did .The new one probably
better reflects or is more consistent with yours now ...

I think democrats should be cautious. If they push this, and win the case that sets a new precedent for this law, giving this law teeth. A law with
vague boundaries and a large net like this weaponizes the DOJ.

They aren`t even trying to hide their desperation it`s obvious and pathetic. Their desperate attempts to overthrow a sitting president are
unprecedented.
They are terrified that trump is going to discover and expose all the corruption they have been involved in over the last 8 years.
They are being backed into a corner their very lives and careers are on the line they will stop at nothing to save themselves.

They are terrified that trump is going to discover and expose all the corruption they have been involved in over the last 8 years.

Its not the exposing and discovering thing .Trump and most of us already know that crap . Its the prosecution and convictions they are in a
knot about .Trumps people are not their people and they are terrified of that one fact alone . Trump has a big challenge but I think his team are
willing to help him work it out so it does not fail . So far it looks promising despite all the hand waving . This past two weeks must have felt like
2 years of sheer hell for the left ,and others .

Glad you asked but am surprised that you would ,considering your stats . I went and got another viid and at the end that question is posed ,
but without your word "completely" ...That word is a bait word :>) believing something to be completely true and trusting someone completely to be
telling you the truth are not the same thing . You have to be completely convinced yourself if you want to know the truth . Me telling you something
that is true but unrelated to the story or point I may be making is one of the best ways to get someone to agree . Then lay claim that you agreed with
me . Its a tactic the fake news use as well as others in making points to win arguments . just for the sake of winning or not loosing and the truth
does not matter then . eta ...this is the one I was looking for and the answer lies with the guy at the very end [vid]

here is a vid but its not exactly the one I wanted to find and that is the truth [vid]

[edited to remove video embeds]

I asked you a simple question, that you failed to answer:

What source(s) can I trust? Hell, just give me three that are mostly trustworthy. I don't want the one that aren't trustworthy, I want
the ones I can trust.

All it takes is three names. Don't dance around the question.

I'm not wasting my time watching videos; I want you to type three news outlets that are, IYO, mostly trustworthy. I don't want some stupid videos.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.