Instead of doing the regular reports on our readings this week, I have decided
to do a brief report on husband battering. I hope this is okay. If not, please
let me know, and I'll stick to the readings in the future.

Part of the reason I had for doing this was that I realized on Friday in
class that I was throwing out a lot of statistics and information that
contradicted some very widely- and commonly-held beliefs about family violence.
I know that when I first heard some of these assertions I had a hard time
believing them, and there is no reason for me to expect that my classmates
will be any more willing to accept these arguments without documentation
than I was.

The first reaction upon hearing about the topic of battered men, for many
people, is that of incredulity. Battered husbands are a topic for jokes (such
as the cartoon image of a woman chasing her husband with a rolling-pin).
One researcher noted that wives were the perpetrators in 73% of the depictions
of domestic violence in newspaper comics (Saenger 1963).

Battered husbands have historically been either ignored or subjected to ridicule
and abuse. In 18th-century France, a battered husband "was made to wear an
outlandish outfit and ride backwards around the village on a donkey" (Steinmetz
& Lucca 1988).

Even those of us who like to consider ourselves liberated and open-minded
often have a difficult time even imagining that husband battering could take
place. Although feminism has opened many of our eyes about the existence
of domestic violence, and newspaper reports often include incidents of abuse
of wives, the abuse of husbands is a rarely discussed phenomenon.

One reason researchers and others had not chosen to investigate husband battering
is because it was thought to be a fairly rare occurrence. Police reports
seemed to bear this out (Steinmetz 1977), with in some cases a ratio of 12
to 14.5 female victims to every one male victim.

But another reason is that because women were seen as weaker and more helpless
than men due to sex roles, and men on the other hand were seen as more sturdy
and self-reliant, the study of abused husbands seemed relatively unimportant.

In 1974, a study was done which compared male and female domestic violence.
In that study, it was found that 47% of husbands had used physical violence
on their wives, and 33% of wives had used violence on their husbands (Gelles
1974). Half of the respondents in this study were selected from either cases
of domestic violence reported to the police, or those identified by the social
service agency.

Also in 1974, a study was released showing that the number of murders of
women by men (17.5% of total homicides) was about the same as the number
of murders of men by women (16.4% of total homicides). This study (Curtis
1974), however, showed that men were three times as likely to assault women
as vice-versa. These statistics came from police records.

[The murder statistic was no big news, by the way. In 1958, an investigation
of spousal homicide between 1948 and 1952 found that 7.8% of murder victims
were husbands murdered by wives, and 8% were wives murdered by husbands

(Wolfgang 1958). More recently, in a study of spousal homicide in the period
from 1976 to 1985, it was found that there was an overall ratio of 1.3:1.0
of murdered wives to murdered husbands, and that "Black husbands were at
greater risk of spouse homicide victimization than Black wives or White spouses
of either sex" (Mercy & Saltzman 1989)]

The subject of husband-battering had finally been addressed, but not to the
great satisfaction of anyone. Although it had finally been shown that there
was violence being perpetrated both by wives and husbands, there was no
information about relative frequency or severity, or who initiated the abuse
and who was acting in self defense. Furthermore, some researchers became
concerned that the use of police or social services references in choosing
subjects to study might be biasing the results. In short, they recognized
that battered husbands might be nearly invisible next to their female
counterparts.

In 1976, for instance, in a critique of the Curtis report (which found women
less likely to assault, but as likely to murder, as men), Wilt & Bannon
wrote that "nonfatal violence committed by women against men is less likely
to be reported to the police than is violence by men against women; thus,
women assaulters who come to the attention of the police are likely to be
those who have produced a fatal result."

In 1977, Suzanne Steinmetz released results from several studies showing
that the percentage of wives who have used physical violence is higher than
the percentage of husbands, and that the wives' average violence score tended
to be higher, although men were somewhat more likely to cause greater injury.
She also found that women were as likely as men to initiate physical violence,
and that they had similar motives for their violent acts (Steinmetz 1977-78).

In 1979, a telephone survey was conducted in which subjects were asked about
their experiences of domestic violence (Nisonoff & Bitman 1979). 15.5%
of the men and 11.3% of the women reported having hit their spouse; 18.6%
of the men and 12.7% of the women reported having been hit by their spouse.

In 1980, a team of researchers, including Steinmetz, attempted to address
some concerns about the earlier surveys (Straus, Gelles & Steinmetz,
1980).

They created a nationally representative study of family violence and found
that the total violence scores seemed to be about even between husbands and
wives, and that wives tended to be more abusive in almost all categories
except pushing and shoving.

Straus & Gelles did a followup survey in 1985, comparing their data to
a 1975 survey (Straus & Gelles 1986). They found that in that decade,
domestic violence against women dropped from 12.1% of women to 11.3% while
domestic violence against men rose from 11.6% to 12.1%. The rate of severely
violent incidents dropped for both groups: From 3.8% to 3.0% of women victimized
and from 4.6% to 4.4% for men.

In 1986, a report appeared in Social Work, the journal of the National
Association of Social Workers (Nov./Dec. 1986) on violence in adolescent
dating relationships, in which it was found that girls were violent more
frequently than boys.

Another report on premarital violence (O'Leary, et al) found that 34% of
the males and 40% of the females reported engaging in some form of physical
aggression against their mates in a year. 17% of women and 7% of men reported
engaging in severe physical aggression. 35% of the men and 30% of the women
reported having been abused.

Also in 1986, Marriage and Divorce Today, a newsletter for family therapy
practitioners, reported on a study done by Pillemer and Finkelhor of the
Family Violence Research Laboratory of the University of New Hampshire. The
study, based on interviews of over 2000 elderly persons in the Boston
metropolitan area, found that 3.2% of the elderly had been abused. 52% of
the abuse victims were men.

The idea of women being violent is a hard thing for many people to believe.
It goes against the stereotype of the passive and helpless female. This,
in spite of the fact that women are known to be more likely than men to commit
child abuse and child murder (Daly & Wilson 1988 report 54% of parent-child
murders where the child is under 17 were committed by the mother in Canada
between 1974 and 1983, for instance. The Statistical Abstract of the United
States 1987 reports that of reported child maltreatment cases between 1980
and 1984 between 57.0% and 61.4% of these were perpetrated by the mother.

Nagi 1977 found 53.1% of perpetrators were female, 21% male and 22.6% both.
Note that because mothers tend to have more access to children than do fathers
that these results should not be interpreted to mean that were things equal,
women would still commit more abuse).

In addition, a study in a doctoral dissertation by psychologist Vallerie
Coleman of 90 lesbian couples, showed that 46% had experienced repeated violent
incidents (Garcia, 1991).

Results like these are greeted with great suspicion by those who see domestic
violence as a political issue to be exploited rather than a social problem
to be solved.

Coramae Mann, a criminologist at Indiana University, studied the case records
of all murders committed by women between 1979 and 1983 in six major U.S.
cities. Her findings contradicted commonly-held ideas about women who murder,
and she was criticized by some people for this.

"They would raise the question, 'Well you have these poor battered women.'
I said these weren't poor battered women. Many already had violent criminal
records. They weren't weak or dependent. They were angry."

Straus & Gelles commented in their 1986 report that "violence by wives
has not been an object of public concern... In fact, our 1975 study was
criticized for presenting statistics on violence by wives."

So domestic violence is an issue framed in the media and in the political
arena as one of male perpetrators and female victims. Violence in gay and
lesbian relationships is rarely discussed, and violence against men in
heterosexual relationships less so.

When it is addressed, there is a response. When I became the caretaker of
a memorial fund for a male victim of domestic violence, I unexpectedly took
on the role of counselor for men calling from all over the country to talk
to me at length about their or their father's victimization. When the subject
of battered husbands was raised on British television and the London Times
did an article on the subject, hundreds of calls came in from male victims
to a special helpline set up by a Women's Aid group (Rooke 1991).

The terms "wife beating" and "battered women" have become political expressions,
rather than descriptions of reality. And because the issue of domestic violence
has been substantially taken out of the arena of serious sociological study,
and thrust into the political arena, the definitions of spousal abuse, and
the proposed remedies to spousal abuse, will be political ones -- not necessarily
ones which reflect the reality of the existing problems.

In a book on domestic violence, Roger Langley and Richard C. Levy conclude
a chapter on battered husbands by saying, "Husband abuse should not be viewed
as merely the opposite side of the coin to wife abuse. Both are part of the
same problem, which should be described as one _person_ abusing another _person_.
The problem must be faced and dealt with not in terms of sex but in terms
of humanity" (Langley & Levy 1977, p. 208). Ironically the book in which
this quote appears is entitled "Wife Beating: The Silent Crisis."

Legislation about domestic violence is always oriented toward the female
victim. For instance, in 1991, Senator Joseph Biden again introduced the
"Violence Against Women Act" which at this writing has passed the senate
Judiciary Committee. It has a section called "Safe homes for Women" which
specifically allocates funds to "women's" shelters (Biden 1991, also see
Boxer 1990).

Also note actions like that of Ohio governor Richard F. Celeste who granted
clemency to 25 women who were in prison for murdering their husbands. The
reason he gave for this was the "Battered Woman Syndrome" which, obviously,
no man can claim as his defense (Wilkerson 1990). There is very little concern
shown either for the idea of making spousal abuse a capital crime with the
victim as extra-judicial executioner, nor for the idea that perhaps some
of the men who murder their spouses might be suffering from an analogous
"Battered Man Syndrome."

There is only one case I am aware of in which a man was able to use a similar
defense. Warren Farrell writes about it in his book _Why Men Are the Way
They Are_ (Farrell 1986, p. 231): Betty King had beaten, slashed, stabbed,
thrown dry acid on, and shot her husband. Eddie King had not sought prosecution
when she slashed his face with a carpet knife, nor when she left him in a
parking lot with a blade in his back. Neither of these incidents even made
the police records as statistics. She was only arrested twice -- when she
stabbed him so severely in the back and so publicly (in a bar) that the incidents
had to be reported.

All these stabbings, shootings, and acid-throwings happened during a four-year
marriage. During a subsequent shouting match on the porch of a friend's house,
Betty King once again reached into her purse. This time Eddie King shot her.
When an investigation led to a verdict of self-defense, there was an outcry
of opposition from feminists and the media.

Farrell compares this case, in which "a two-second delay could have meant
his death," to that of the celebrated case made into the television movie
The Burning Bed in which the protagonist murdered her husband while he slept.

In conclusion, I think that the available data show that husband battering
is a serious problem, comparable to the problem of wife battering. Even if
the statistics collected in the last several years are completely wrong and
only one in 14 victims of spousal abuse are men, these are men who are hurting
and need services that are currently not available.

There is such a strong stigma against being a battered man, carried over
from medieval times when the battered man was considered the guilty party,
that special attention should be paid to reaching out to these victims.

Simply opening up "Women's Shelters" to men is not enough.

References

Biden, Joseph "Violence Against Women Act of 1990" (S. 15) 1991.

Boxer, Barbara "A Bill to combat violence and crimes against women on the

2. Some statistics on female violence from the South County Current,
Jan 26, 2000, Page A-7. "Silent Violence"

"Greene reported that 65% of son or daughter murders involve a female killer,
41% of spouse murders involve a female killer, 30% of family murders involve
a female killer, 18% of parent murders involve a female killer and 15% of
sibling murders involve a female killer."

There may be a pattern here. The more power the female has in these
relationships, the more they are the killers. It seems like there is
rage over others trying to be their own boss. That pattern may show
up in different ways as females gain more power in our society.

Of course the other pattern for male killers is also here. That means
that 35% of sons and daughters are murdered by males, 59% of spouses are
murdered by males, 70% of family members involve males, 82% of parents are
killed by males and 85% of siblings are killed by the male.

There may be a pattern here. The less power the male has in these
relationships, the more they are the killers. It seems like there is
rage over others trying to boss them. That pattern may show up in different
ways as more females try to boss males as they gain more power in our society.

Violence is not just a matter of what our sex is, violence is deeper than
that. We need to get out of our blame games and on to what works to
reduce violence in all of us. What we need is more leadership and less
bossing. That is what I wrote about here.