I never read it to mean that you couldn't do other things with
the xml - but if you want to deserialize it then yes you must use
those encoding rules - but of course we can't control what
people 'really' do, can we. :-)
-Dug
"Andrew Layman" <andrew@strongbrains.com>@w3.org on 12/10/2001 10:55:01 PM
Please respond to "Andrew Layman" <mail@strongbrains.com>
Sent by: xmlp-comments-request@w3.org
To: xmlp-comments@w3.org
cc:
Subject: Re: issue #159 resolution addendum
Perhaps I am reading this out of context, but the quote sounds peculiar to
me. The soap-enc:encodingStyle attribute says that the writer asserts that
IF you follow the rules you will end up a certain graph; but that is not
the
same as forbidding all readers to use other processes and end up with
something else. Does this resolution say that it is improper to apply XSL
to elements within the scope of a soap-enc:encodingStyle attribute? To
render the characters in an emacs display without ever deserializing? etc.
Andrew Layman
http://strongbrains.com -- Resources for Self-Education
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>
To: "XMLP Comments" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Cc: <dug@us.ibm.com>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: issue #159 resolution addendum
Hello all. 8-)
I apologize but only after rereading the minutes of the f2f
meeting (not public yet, but soon) I've realized that resolution
to #159 contains the following, too:
"Change 'can' to 'MUST' in section 4.1.1 of part 1 of the spec:
the >>serialization rules that can be used to deserialize the
SOAP message<< should be changed to >>serialization rules that
MUST be used to deserialize the SOAP message<<."
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
http://www.systinet.com/