If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Joe v. Paul: A gun owners guide to vice presidents

Last Saturday morning, in the great Commonwealth of Virginia, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney announced Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan as his pick for vice president.

Therefore, as part of my ongoing series about the presidential race, I decided to do an evaluation of where the two vice-presidential candidates stand on gun rights issues. I have a pretty good idea what the answer is going to be but it is vitally important that we base our views upon facts and not anecdotes. So let us see what a little research tells us about which of the two candidates would be better suited to protect our rights if they were called upon to assume the presidency or to cast a deciding vote in the Senate ...

"If we were to ever consider citizenship as the least bit matter of merit instead of birthright, imagine who should be selected as deserved representation of our democracy: someone who would risk their daily livelihood to cast an individually statistically insignificant vote, or those who wrap themselves in the flag against slightest slights." - agenthex

I was thinking the same thing. Darn was supposed to go meet him.......

I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
"Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

...
- 4 of the 9 (of whom all 3 of the women are included) disagree completely with Scalia and the majority, ergo it was probably not wise appointing female justices to the court.

I could definitely live with a new amendment to the Constitution banning women from being appointed to the US Supreme Court, right about now.

You are entitled to your belief but here at OCDO, we believe in equal rights and opportunities for ALL Americans! What we need are more pro-gun justices and I will take them black, white, hispanic, asian, male, female, trans-gender and bald. As long as they will uphold our rights, then I stand with them!