that framework is nonenforceable.
it really isn't a shitty take
the united states is energy independent and has been reducing emissions consistently

It's literally the most successful climate accord ever and when we're less than, what, 48h from one member state being exposed, apparently it's now a failure. **** the factories for doing what they're doing, but we stomped it out when Russia did the same back in the 90s so it seems a bit premature to give up on enforcement.

It's literally the most successful climate accord ever and when we're less than, what, 48h from one member state being exposed, apparently it's now a failure. **** the factories for doing what they're doing, but we stomped it out when Russia did the same back in the 90s so it seems a bit premature to give up on enforcement..

yeah. total failure. it has not been enforced.
when china pubically publish their emissions (legitimately), we can come to a resolution
they won't and we'll patiently wait
for a while.

US energy independence relates to the goal of reducing the United States imports of petroleum and other foreign sources of energy. ... In total energy consumption, the US was between 86% and 91% self-sufficient in 2016. In May 2011, the country became a net exporter of refined petroleum products.

If you really don't care then why do you bother replying to my post instead of just ignoring it?

I don't really care about your posts either but I can still reply to them because sometimes it's funny and it takes a few seconds at most? Although honestly I kinda like hearing your pov, I just wish it was one or two steps closer to reality sometimes.