Crimes of OWS by Category

Originally posted by CaDreamer
so that means with your logic... that ALL tea partiers are unstable, gun toting criminals bent on killing everyone they view as a threat...since
Jared Loughner has ties to the tea party.

painting an entire movement of 10s of thousands, worldwide, because of a couple of handfuls of criminals is the blind leading the naked.

Please provide the list of crimes that occurred during Tea Party Rallies.

Jared Loughner WAS A DEMOCRAT... He VOTED for the woman he shot! And he did it because she wasn't liberal enough for him... He even worked for her
campaign! How can so many people not know this???

doesnt matter his affiliation, the OP has made it clear...it happened at a Tea Party event so it must be representative of the Tea Party, to say
otherwise throws major doubt into the mix as to the OP statement that these crimes represent the OWS movement since it happened at OWS events.

The event was a Rally for Giffords and the Judge, not a Tea Party rally.

What i find disturbing is the number of people dismissing these acts and the sheer number of them OWS represents the clear double standard that so
many people have and would never have let the TPM get away with.

Guess the means to justify the end for them all in the name of a movement hell a 14 year old girl was raped.

Guess the means to justify the end for them all in the name of a movement hell a 14 year old girl was raped.

Meh

edit on 7-11-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)

It's horrible when anybody is subjected to rape. It happens quite often, and a lot of the time not even reported.

What I don't understand is how you can assume the responsibility for this crime on a movement in general. Where were the parents of this girl when
this happened?

Sometimes the reason for a crime like this begins at home. In no way would I ever allow a 14 year old child of mine to be participating in something
like this, unless they were standing right by my side.

That's the skewed worldview of the millenial generation: everyone gets to be a victim, even the rapist.

The article paints the WHOLE generation not just occupy in this light.

2)

She initially told officers that she had sex with a man in his early twenties and had engaged in sexual activity with several other people.

Some members of the group told CBS 11 the girl identified herself as a 19-year-old and never knew she was 14.

Willing sex! no sexual assault other than the man in question believed the girl about her age and happened to be wrong.( please do not single this
post to debate. because I DO NOT advocate sex with minors)

3)

Members of Occupy Glasgow are working with police and other agencies to help with the investigation and to improve safety measures for those
involved in the protest.

I'll give You the assault but not the indifference that You Imply all Occupiers have towards the victims.

4)

Both investigations are still open and Martin could not confirm any more details about the alleged battery or sexual assault.

This an alleged assault told to the reporter by someone that heard it from someone else. WTH really? this is credible enough to use as Your
"proof"?

5) Is an article from The New York Post and as can be clearly seen at
this link they don't amount to much more than the National
enquirer to me with their sensationalism and bias.

6) I feel for this woman and am upset the crowd wouldn't help her find the perpetrator.

7) Another story from the biased Rag The New York post.

8)

The man is accused of exposing himself three times on Sept. 29 -- once in Crown Hill, once near Alki Beach, and a third time on Capitol Hill.
Three days later, he was spotted at Pinehurst Playfield near Northgate, and then again on Oct. 3 at the Lakeside soccer field in North
Seattle.

This guy was not arrested at nor did his crimes happen at Occupy Seattle. He was said to have been taking part in the protests but of course people
that get off by exposing themselves would tend to gravitate towards a large crowd.

9) This is the exact same case as in link 2 so isn't even worth going into because You doubled up on Your stories to make it seem like there were more
incidents than there really are.

So You have doubled up stories, biased national enquirer esque stories, a couple "alleged" assaults that You're basing on 3rd hand information. a
story that didn't involve Occupy at all other than the perpetrator may(or may not) have been there on one particular day in his life.

Sorry but You're going to have to come up with some better evidence than what You have provided in Your first 9 links before I even consider reading
anymore of the links to sensationalism and fear mongering that occurs in Your OP.

Apparently, the police are concerned that these camps are also attracted people recently released from prison who are in search of food and shelter.
So, pick up a sign, grab a sandwich and light up a crack pipe.... It does not matter to Occupy because its just another warm body in the camp to hold
a sign..

So people that have been released from prison (paid their debt to society for their crimes) have no right to seek food and shelter? The arguments
keep getting weaker and weaker.

get caught with a minor amount of drugs and stay in prison for the rest of Your life because we refuse to allow You to seek food and shelter in our
society? Pfft that's ridiculous thinking.

edit on 7-11-2011 by Adamanteus because: (no reason given)

Nice Jump!! How in the world did you get that from what I just wrote. I never said that these people had no right to seek food and shelter. Nice
try!! The police actually mad the statement as to the possibility of these recently released prisoners infiltrating these camps looking for a
variety of opportunities.

First, they ignore, then they misrepresent, then they sensationalize... it's a marvelous example of what corporate media is capable of... when they
are all on the same side.

The list of incidents presented reminds me of the litany of "offenses" at Woodstock... and the less subtle claims made about the Civil-Rights movement
and her supprters. But of course, they know that no one will consider it corporate McCarthyism if they want to avoid seeming 'sympathetic' to these
apparently well organized anarchists who have the undeniable gall to claim that "something ain't right" in a world where corporations write laws,
influence politics, control law enforcement, start wars, profit from famine, and demand obedience to their paradigms of social engineering.

I don't mind it much though.... especially since these are the same reporters whose idea of journalism is to take a paper authored by someone else,
and call it "news." After all, the OWS-style activism going on in the world today clearly frightens them... and we know what these types do when they
are frightened.... they spread the fear.

I recently heard about some beloved sports coach getting nailed for pedophilia after 10 years or so of it being "observed" adding that to the
steroids, illegal gambling, party-rape crimes, winning and losing riots, brawls, and other grotesqueries... you would think they would defame all
sports fans and participants as thugs, criminals and degenerates.... but they don't.... can you guess why?

Apparently, the police are concerned that these camps are also attracted people recently released from prison who are in search of food and shelter.
So, pick up a sign, grab a sandwich and light up a crack pipe.... It does not matter to Occupy because its just another warm body in the camp to hold
a sign..

Apparently, the police are concerned that these camps are also attracted people recently released from prison who are in search of food and shelter.
So, pick up a sign, grab a sandwich and light up a crack pipe.... It does not matter to Occupy because its just another warm body in the camp to hold
a sign..

Why were crack dealers there?

Because there were occu pie protesters to be served.

Never would of been there if the protesters were not smoking
crack!!

Nice jump to a conclusion. I don't know about Boston's park but I am aware that zucotti park had a homeless population long before Occupy ever
arrived( is it possible some of these people are homeless due to being drug addicts?) So maybe the drug scene was already established and the crack
dealers were using the crowds as cover(and of course hoping to pick up a new client or two.)

Your logic fails just as if You were saying because hookers walk a particular strip then everyone who drives down that strip is searching for hookers
or because Gay men meet at a certain park to have anonymous sex with strangers then everyone using that park is there for that purpose.

Intelligent people no longer trust the corporate media to present the truth, and they understand that just because a person on a site says something
that actually doesn't make it true. These people visit a protest for themselves and actually talk to the protesters. They watch the live feeds. They
read the blogs by those who visit and take part. They don't blindly trust some random site with obvious political agendas.

All of those intelligent people see through all the right-wing propaganda and media manipulation and see it for what it is. And these intelligent
people also recognize the propagandists when they see them too, and they point and laugh.

------->

That was me pointing and laughing.

But then again...you obviously agree with anything that a propagandizing left web site ran by someone on their PJ is oh so obviously telling the
truth.

Just because you like they way they write. HHHmmmm

This is me just giving you the finger. Your bias is not even funny enough to laugh at.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.