A new report claims that Apple and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. have actually sealed the deal on a three-year agreement to supply A-series chips for future iPhones and iPads.

All of Apple's iDevice chips to date have been manufactured by Samsung in Austin, Tex.

Rumors of an agreement between the two companies have continued to crop up for years, but a report published on Monday by DigiTimes not only claims a deal has been made, but gets into specifics about the terms of the contract. In particular, TSMC and its integrated service partner Global UniChip are said to be planning to supply A-series chips built on 20-nanometer, 16-nanometer, and 10-nanometer process nodes.

The report claims TSMC will begin limited trial runs of manufacturing 20-nanometer "A8" chips as soon as this July, though production won't ramp up substantially until September. It's expected that devices utilizing the so-called "A8" chip would debut in 2014.

In addition, it was said that TSMC's phase 4, 5 and 6 facilities at its Fab 14 location in southern Taiwan will be solely dedicated to building A-series chips for Apple.

It should be noted that DigiTimes is notorious for reporting rumors from the technology industry supply chain that prove incorrect. However, the publication does on occasion relay accurate claims on Apple and other companies.

For years, reports have claimed that Apple was interested in forging a partnership with TSMC  a move that would allow the iPhone maker to cut Samsung out of its supply chain. Currently, Samsung is the sole supplier of Apple's custom A-series chips, while also being Apple's chief rival.

Monday's report does align with a rumor that surfaced earlier this year, in April, which claimed that TSMC would build 20-nanometer chips for Apple's 2014 iPhone model. However, for years reports have claimed that TSMC was on the verge of joining Apple's supply chain.

There's even been speculation that Intel could begin manufacturing A-series chips as Apple looks to broaden its supplier base. Intel is currently the sole supplier of processors for the company's Mac lineup.

Apple's first custom A-series chip, the A4, debuted in the first-generation iPad in 2010, and launched in the iPhone 4 later that year, while the A5 was introduced in the iPad 2 and later came to the iPhone 4S in 2011. Since then, new iPad models have had enhanced chips with an "X" moniker, like the A5X in the third-generation iPad and A6X in the fourth-generation model, while the A6 chip debuted last year in the iPhone 5.

I hope Apple gets am ironclad agreement with TSMC that, if they want to supply components to Apple, they won't also compete with Apple with consumer products.

Apple has been f'd over during its entire history by backstabbing suppliers. Microsoft, Adobe, Motorola, Google and Samsung all got tremendous opportunties by working for Apple and then ended up showing their gratitude with betrayal and theft.

The Microsoft debacle was a complete botch on Apple Legal's part as they got away with stealing from Apple to make Windows. Things seem to be going fairly well with the prosecution of Samsung, although justice is not yet served. I'm saddened that Apple hasn't pursued Google with thermonuclear war, as was Steve Jobs' dying wish.

I just hope that Apple has established agreements to prevent TSMC from becoming the next Judas.

I hope Apple gets am ironclad agreement with TSMC that, if they want to supply components to Apple, they won't also compete with Apple with consumer products.

Apple has been f'd over during its entire history by backstabbing suppliers. Microsoft, Adobe, Motorola, Google and Samsung all got tremendous opportunties by working for Apple and then ended up showing their gratitude with betrayal and theft.

The Microsoft debacle was a complete botch on Apple Legal's part as they got away with stealing from Apple to make Windows. Things seem to be going fairly well with the prosecution of Samsung, although justice is not yet served. I'm saddened that Apple hasn't pursued Google with thermonuclear war, as was Steve Jobs' dying wish.

I just hope that Apple has established agreements to prevent TSMC from becoming the next Judas.

I thinkthe best way to compete with google for example is not by using courts, but by competing with them. Apple maps is an example. iRadio with ads is a good example. More services with iAds will hurt them more then lawsuits.

TSMC makes semiconductors, not finished products. So, it's unlikely they'd go head-to-head with Apple in the marketplace. They can, and will, produce semiconductors for Apple competitors and there is little Apple can do legally or practically to stop that.

I hope Apple gets am ironclad agreement with TSMC that, if they want to supply components to Apple, they won't also compete with Apple with consumer products.

Apple has been f'd over during its entire history by backstabbing suppliers. Microsoft, Adobe, Motorola, Google and Samsung all got tremendous opportunties by working for Apple and then ended up showing their gratitude with betrayal and theft.

The Microsoft debacle was a complete botch on Apple Legal's part as they got away with stealing from Apple to make Windows. Things seem to be going fairly well with the prosecution of Samsung, although justice is not yet served. I'm saddened that Apple hasn't pursued Google with thermonuclear war, as was Steve Jobs' dying wish.

I just hope that Apple has established agreements to prevent TSMC from becoming the next Judas.

TSMC doesn't make anything other than semiconductor components, solid state lighting components and solar cells. They aren't a finished products mfg like Samscum.

Yeah, everyone knows that the companies mentioned have kind of screwed Apple one way or another, but I think it has to be that Apple wasn't big enough to warrant these companies to generate enough business without doing business with others and Apple has come up with great products that starts trends.

I hope Apple is able to step up the product development since they got rid of Forstall on the iOS side and now if they can eliminate the need to rely on Samscum for critical components.

I am confuse on the cpus. The A6 are made on what kind of plants? Those 20, 10, 8 nanometers seems very low.

On diversification, Apple could also use AMD or Intel to have 2 suppliers.

AMD doesn't have the foundries to do it, they rely on IBM to mfg parts.

I think Apple will use Intel and they might even be able to use IBM if need be.

It's too bad Apple doesn't build their own plants to do it themselves, but they would have to have ultimately at least 3 or 4 plants, which would take a long time to build. They do have the money to do it. I think each plant is probably about $3 to $5 BIllion depending on the size. One or two for production while the other plants are in a state of being built to handle the next gen technology and then flip flopping opening and renovating plants as time goes on. Owning semiconductor plants is NOT cheap, plus having the knowhow and the right equipment to even make these types of products.

It would be great if Sharp could do all of their panel needs for their entire product line, since both LG and Samscum make competing products with Apple.

I just wish the respective governments of these component/finished product companies split them up somehow so they aren't in conflict of interest. Making components for customers and then making finished goods that compete with their component customers is a VERY unethical business model.