Truth in a world of Lies and stupidity

Category: Social Justice Warrior

We have turned a tide in what and who liberals are. No longer can we say that Liberals are good people. Kind people. Or even tolerant people. Today, those ideals belong to conservatives.

Classic Liberalism held to these ideals and many people who consider themselves liberal follow these values. However, a new form of Liberalism has taken power and it calls itself progressive.

We saw this during the american Trump campaign. The lies, the hate, the vile rhetoric and most importantly how progressive liberals, spread their banner of love under the actions of hate and fear.

Progressives are now the bullies and the hated. Along with feminists and social justice warriors who all fly under the banner of progressive ideals. I have to wonder though, how progressive is it, to attack someone for money, accept money to commit violence, lie about crimes against a minority group.

It’s time to call out liberals for what they are. The rest of use just want to live in peace. Live our lives the way we want, say what we want, when we want. Criticize an ideology, idea, debate it, dissect it, without being called racist, sexist, bigoted or any of the other myriad of “isms” which are intended to quite our collective voices. Did you know it is racist to criticize the crime that a person of color has committed? That it is racist to believe that they actually did do the crime, even when that crime has been captured on video?

Liberal media is partially to blame for the modern day idea that these stories can be anything but what they say it is. If you speak out against the narrative, then you get viciously attacked by swarms of liberals.

Take the recent story of the lady who spoke with Justin Trudeau over the skyrocketing hydro rates in Ontario. She spoke with eloquence and with passion, from the heart. Asking and speaking what many, many people in Ontario are thinking. She has medical issues and yet she worked multiple jobs to pay a monthly hydro bill which was higher than her mortgage. The response was disgusting. Death threats, threats on her family, harassment and all for a 2 minute video of her asking questions of the prime minister and his lackluster non response.

You can see the bullying, attacks on people, almost daily. And it will get worse. We just had our own version of Trump announce that he will be entering the leadership race for the conservative party in Canada. His name. Kevin O’Leary. A great businessman, but questionable on social niceties. And just days after his announcement, the liberals are already passing insults, derogatory comments, and trying to smear his name and worse, ignore his accomplishments, by simply calling him a reality tv show star.

Liberals, Feminists, SJWs are bullies, racists and sexist.

You can always tell because they will use terms like “Mansplaining from a old white guy” – Ageism, Sexism, Racism is what I hear in that sentence. Or how black people cannot be racist. The idea that no other race can be racist when historically and currently, there is rampant racism in the other races.

So stop being nice to liberals if they attack you. Don’t walk away. Human beings won’t learn unless they get their proverbial hand slapped. So let’s slap their hands. Together we can make Canada great again.

To many people, they believe that gender fluid means that you can change your gender, like you can change your underwear. The reality (truth) is that you can’t. Gender is the description word we use to describe the sex of a person via pronouns. “He” is the gender pronoun for a male. “She” is the gender pronoun for a female.

The gender fluid idea not only dictates that you change your gender like you change your underwear, but that there must be a new gender pronouns created to describe these people.

Gender neutral pronouns have been created so people won’t offend their special snowflake friends.

Here is an example of made up, and in some cases unpronounceable pronouns:

More of the garbage can be found here: http://uwm.edu/lgbtrc/support/gender-pronouns/

The problem with all this is simply the fact that people actually think, that changing your gender is the simply act of a way of thought or clothing. The act of putting on a dress for a guy or bandaging up the breasts for a woman and putting on the opposite gender’s clothing means that they are the opposite sex. It is not. This is typically known as cross-dressing.

I’ve heard the idea from the idiots who believe this nonsense that gender is based on your personality, and not your anatomy. This is also untrue, since your anatomy dictates if your male or female. Hence, why people say “Penis = Male” and “Vagina = Female”.

There are mentally ill people who think they are puppy dogs to and want to live out their lives as dogs or even other animals or even mythical creatures.

That brings me to trans-gendered people. These people fall into the same category as the above.

These people suffer from a mental illness called “Gender Dysphoria”

These are people who are unhappy with their biological sex and believe they are the opposite sex. That somehow, the doctor when they were born, didn’t recognize the proper gender and “assigned” them the wrong one.

Decades ago this was treated, successfully I might add, as a mental illness. The treatment used to entail regular visits to a psychiatrist and medication. It was believed that people who suffered from this illness had a chemical imbalance. Then came the gay rights movement and feminism. They cited that it was NOT a mental illness that gender is a social construct. They convinced enough people, to re-examine the idea of the treatments, saying they are more harmful than helpful because it ignores the person’s feelings. Remember folks, feeling over fact and science is precedence with these people.

Then doctors created the mutilation surgeries that are still to this day, really bad. They allow people to voluntarily mutilate their bodies via cosmetic surgery in an effort to look like the opposite sex, while not being able to be biologically the opposite sex.

Let me explain.

You cannot change your DNA. You cannot change your muscle structure. You cannot change your skeletal structure. So your body regardless of the surgery will still show up as your sex that you were born as. This makes all those transgender surgeries under the category of cosmetic.

The worse part of it is that they are chopping off working body parts, and sewing on body parts that do not work as intended. For example, a male undergoing a male to female surgery, will not have a working uterus, and no eggs. So after the surgery she cannot bear children. A female to male is worse. In many cases the female decides to KEEP her uterus and have a penis sewn on. Only the penis cannot produce sperm and needs a rod or a pump installed to inflate it to be able to have sex. So technically it doesn’t work as functioning male either. In many of the cases of the women who go through those surgeries and keep their uterus, they decide at some point to have a baby.

Transgender means that you are transitioning from one gender to another. It doesn’t mean you can stay in that middle state and call yourself a man if you have a uterus.
Then the argument comes in that “Oh but the surgeries are expensive”. Yes, well cosmetic surgeries usually are, because they do not add any value to health. And are why they call them cosmetic.

And these people still are not happy after they go through with the surgeries. In fact many regret doing it. So much that they commit suicide in the same high numbers as they do before the surgeries.

When you fight your own biology, you will lose. You can’t change your gender. It is scientifically an impossibility. Feminist theory professors have an agenda. Indoctrination into the cult of feminism. They need to convince young minds that their theories are facts and due to the borg collective mentally of feminism, many just believe this without question.

The problem with ideology like this is the fact it is based on the idea that White man oppressor Everyone else good victim.

The writer also runs under the feminist ideology. This ideology is based on the idea that if you don’t have any self doubt or don’t think that the reason you didn’t get a job due to your skin color is a privilege. The writer, like most feminists believe white people, or rather white men, don’t have self doubt about getting jobs based on skin color, gender or even sexual orientation. Which of course is the problem, simply because we are all human beings and we all experience self doubt about things, especially when they are not going our way.

The writer makes bold statements that white people are angry at being called racist for saying racist things or having racist beliefs. I myself have been accused of this by a few black people. Why? The reason I’m a so called racist by black people is purely retarded. It’s because I don’t date black people. That’s it. That so far has been the only reason. The writer of this article shows very clearly that they are racist in their thought processes. They constantly insinuate racial issues, and stereotypes etc.

Now while I don’t deny racism does exist, I don’t see it as the problem it was back in the 50’s. This person, like all who follow the feminist ideology of victim-hood believe they are victims somehow. Even when they are not.

The idea that not having any doubts about a job interview is called confidence. That isn’t a privilege. That is actually a trait of someone who is mentally stable and balanced. Even if you have doubt as to why you didn’t get the job, that just means you have doubt or self confidence issues. Which is actually normal for most people. Even I have experienced this, and I am a white guy. White males do experience self doubt. One job that I interviewed for a very long time ago, I didn’t get. I was told by the HR team I was qualified, but they had given to a female. That caused me to have self doubt, did I not get the job because of my gender?

The writer also states “I had had enough. I kept thinking “Why am I always moving out of this guy’s way?” Just about everyone else in the world seemed to agree that if two people were walking toward each other, both people would acquiesce a little…”

I don’t know what part of the world the person is from but if two people are walking towards each other one person always moves out of the way. Sometimes both. Not always though. Why he thinks that being nice and moving out of the other person’s way is a bad thing is part of a larger issue.

I understand that being nice all the time has it’s limits and sometimes you just want to say fuck it and push your way through. But that doesn’t mean you were privileged if someone else moves out of the way. That just means you are a courteous person. That is it.

Privilege boils down to this:

Privilege is something that can be given to you and can be taken away. For example, a privilege , like your laptop you received from daddy at Christmas. If you do something wrong daddy can take that laptop away from you as punishment. Removing the privilege. In other words, privilege comes from outside of yourself, is something that can be taken away by others.

Thinking that you might have not gotten a job is not privilege in any way shape or form. It just isn’t. That is self confidence issues stemming from your own conscious or unconscious desires and not getting those desires fulfilled.

Moral is, if you have a doubt as to why something did not happen or why it happened, don’t go blaming others for your confidence issues. Think to yourself what YOU could have done to have been offered the job or gotten the better shifts. And maybe, just maybe the other person they hired or gave those shifts to were actually better than you.

After all, you can think you are better all you want, but the reality is the only person who is qualified to know is the owner or manager of the job. They are the ones who hire you or do the scheduling and know exactly what kind of performance they need. Not You.

I recently got into a debate on this (again), and for some reason people cannot fathom that hate speech laws are a form of censorship. Worse yet. We have the mayor of Ottawa Jim Watson, who has been in his office since the beginning of time, who openly now tweets and states that he is for the stiffing of speech because he finds it “vile”.

I tweeted him and stated that wanting to censor free speech is wrong, and he responded by calling me vile for supporting the guy who wants to open a dialog about the rape laws.

Reasonable people understand that rape is bad. We all know this. No one condones rape. The problem lies with the idea and definitions of rape.

Feminist supporters think rape can be this magical thing that can happen at any point. Let me explain.

They (Liberals and Feminists) believe that (I’ve written about this before),

A man and a woman who BOTH get drunk, BOTH consent to sex and have sexual intercourse is rape. Why? A woman is apparently unable to consent while drunk.

A woman who goes home with a strange man, gets drunk, takes drugs and gets naked, has sex with the strange man but doesn’t remember having sex has been raped.

A woman who consents to having sex even when sober and then regrets the experience a week later, has been apparently been raped.

Do you notice the trend here? Women are not responsible for their actions but men are despite being equal in things.

So this Return of Kings guy is calling for a debate and discussion about the rape laws if it occurs in your own home.

I get what he is saying and while I don’t agree entirely, with much of what he says, I understand that freedom of speech means being able to talk about things that people may find vile or abhorrent without repercussions from government.

As far as Mayor Jim Watson is concerned the idea of questioning the idea of rape laws is abhorrent. This is the type of people in power and have been in power for a very long time.

I tweeted back the mayor stating the differences, that hate is the calling for 90% of men to be castrated or killed via the #killallmen hashtag. Or the Drinking Male Tears meme which is common among rich white sorority girl feminists who do not understand basic concepts of freedom of speech.

Using these laws to shut down talk and discussion that you “FEEL” is wrong is not a valid reason. Free Speech is a double edged sword. I’m gay and I’ve heard the debate and discussion when gay marriage and even back when gays were not accepted as they are now. I may not have liked what was being said but I never wanted to stop people from speaking their minds on subjects and having rational discussions.

Jim Watson, Justin Trudeau, if a woman or a man goes home with a stranger, and has spent a night flirting and implying they are interested in having sexual intercourse, and they go to either one’s home, get drunk or even not. Get naked and have sex, and one party regrets it the next day, that is not rape. Neither is it when you get drunk, and get naked in someone else’s bed. That is called implied consent. I know this concept is foreign to you but it is a real thing. Penalizing someone for wanting to speak their mind on the subject or banning someone from speaking is called censorship.

And censorship is a form of oppression and hate. Hate of true freedom.

First I would like to thank you for reading my open letter. I know that you are busy, so I will try to keep this short.

Justin Trudeau does not represent Canada. Yes I know, he is the PM of the crown corporation of Canada, and claims he is the representative. However, I will state this. He does not represent the values, nor the ideals of the majority of Canadians.

How can he be the PM then you ask? Good question. First, and foremost, the majority didn’t vote for him. Believe it!

The problem with our voting system is our leaders are chosen years in advance. The media manipulates their audience with back and forth promotions to make it seem like it is a fair and honest election. As I have written in the past about elections and the process I won’t get into here, except that our votes don’t matter and that we do not live in a democracy. If we did the people’ who removed their votes would be counted. In this country though, the people who don’t vote are left behind. In reality only a very small percentage of the Canadian population actually voted in the last election and of them an even smaller number voted liberal.

You see in our country, we are forced to vote for a party, not an individual. So if you like the candidates objectives in your riding and vote for them then the party gets the seats in parliament. This means that the person who is head of that party gets to be PM of the country. If you don’t like the leader of the party but feel the only there is one candidate who falls in with your values or ideas of how the country should be run but hate the leader of that party, you really only have 2 choices. Vote anyway or not vote at all. Last election, the major portion of the population didn’t vote.

Now I know what your thinking. “Then vote and make a difference”. It doesn’t matter. After speaking with Elections Canada, they informed me that even if only 10 people in the whole country voted then then we would still have a PM and the government would still run.

That is NOT a democracy.

So again, Justin Trudeau does not represent Canadians or our values. His mindset is of third wave feminism which is about elevating women, giving them things like money, jobs, opportunities simply based on their gender instead of actually earning those things.

Recently he called for all Canadian’s to “embrace feminism and not be scared of it”. This caused an uproar in the comment section of every media source that printed an article about this.

Canadians’ do not like third wave feminism. Canadians believe in real equality, not the brand of equality that takes from men who have earned their money, job etc, and giving to to women simply because they are women. This brand of feminism goes against the original brand of feminism that was about women having the right to work along side men and earn the same money and the same promotions as men. Not be handed those positions, without earning or working for it, simply based on the the anatomy.

The original feminists who fought back in the 60’s speak out against this current crop of so called feminism.

In this country we believe in fair treatment. We believe if you work hard in your career, and put in the time, sweat and tears into your job then you deserve and should move up the ladder. You don’t get handed the board of directors position simply because you have a degree in gender studies.

To listen to our PM and see his efforts on behalf of feminism you would think we are all feminists, and we are definitely not. It’s time to call out third wave feminism by all. Time to call out the PM for pandering only to an ideal that puts men less than women instead of on equal footing. It’s time to shout down this nonsense from all sources, and stop this before it really becomes harmful on our society.

Canada used to be peacekeepers, and the majority of us still believe we can be this again.
Canada used to be accepting of other cultures and groups. We believe we can be this again.

Canada used to accept all religions and faiths and we believe we can be this again.

Don’t let Justin Trudeau’s face fool you. He is on a leash being controlled by third wave feminism, and he doesn’t speak for us.

And Justin, if you are reading this, understand this, you are a tool for the feminists. You are not a feminist. They will throw you under the bus the minute you are no longer a use to them. A man cannot be a feminist, that is like a black person supporting the slavery of black people. Stop pandering to them and start representing Canada. The real Canada. Otherwise you may lose your job.

One thing I hear about each day, is case after case of men who have been accused of rape or sexual assault in the papers. I barely read those articles anymore, simply due to the fact, they are all the same. The person accused had plied the poor victim with booze or drugs, or had met the poor victim at a party, got drunk together, and then the poor victim went home with the accused and then well, rape.

If you have been a victim of rape, it can be traumatic. We all understand this. I have had two attempts of rape happen to me.

Being a victim doesn’t mean you are blameless. It means something bad has happened to you. It doesn’t mean you are not responsible, nor does it mean you are one hundred percent blameless.

I’ll use the current Cosby case as an example. Here is a woman who admitted under oath, that she went over to Cosby’s Hotel Room. of her own free will. He offered her drinks and she accepted willingly. He offered her drugs. She took voluntarily.

I’m stopping there.

This is why I don’t think is much of a victim. Well, sorry, rather she is a victim of her own actions. She accepted the booze, and drugs of her own free will. He didn’t force her to drink and do the drugs. He didn’t hold a gun to her head.

Does this excuse Cosby if he did it? No it doesn’t, but it does give a clear idea of what the situation was at that meeting. And shows the woman was using poor judgement, and was at least a victim of her own stupidity.

Now I’ll give more detail to my two experiences.
I’ll start off by stating (I’ve mentioned in other blogs), that I’m gay. In my younger days I used to go to bathhouses. These were and are places were gay men of all ages go to have sex. They had reached their height in the Nineties when gays were not yet accepted and there was still a danger to go to a gay bar. It was also a great place for those who were still in the closet to go and have sex.

Now on this night, I had been out drinking at a dance club. I had gone to the bathhouse (because I didn’t find anyone at the bar to go home with), and got a room. In bathhouses when you rent a room it’s this tiny room with this cheaply made bed in it, with a vinyl covered mattress and thin cotton sheet. Everyone who goes to a bathhouse, can either rent a locker or a room, and you are given a towel to wear and that’s it. Basically your naked in a towel and wander around until you find someone you want to have sex with. Or, like me you can rent a room and wait for the guy to come to you. This doesn’t mean you can’t be choosy. In fact many people who go to these places are. We all have our types.

Anyway, I was laying on the bed with the towel barely covering me, when this really, really drunk guy showed up at my open door. I got a bad feeling so I told him no thank you, but I wasn’t interested (this is the politest way there to let the person know to go away). The guy however, had different ideas and came in and shut the door. He proceeded to try to throw my legs above his shoulders and penetrate me. I used both feet on his chest and threw him off, which he flew backwards into the wall. That wasn’t enough and he again tried. And again I threw him off. Banging his head hard on the wall. After a third try he left my room.

I didn’t call the police and even though I was a victim of an attempted rape, it was still my fault. I knew this at the time and to this day I don’t blame that guy. I put myself in that position and I knowingly ran that risk. This is the risk you take when you go and and sexually tease strangers. It’s not pretty but it’s true. When you sexually tease people, you run the risk of pushing the wrong button on someone that will set them off.

The second time, that I consider attempted rape, was when I lived in BC. I lived in this gay hotel and was in the lounge drinking and chatting with the cute bartender. I was happily drinking and at the end of his shift he offered to take me to his room. I drunkenly agreed. We got up to his room and I promptly passed out. With my jeans and underwear on. The next thing I remember was waking up and I was naked with him inside me. I had no recollection of even going up to his room or half the night at the bar. So I freaked out. Pushed him off em and accused him angrily of raping me. He was horrified. He apologized profusely and even sent me flowers the next day. I realized after that he wasn’t at fault. I was. I had accepted his offer to go to his room and that was implied consent. I was the one who made the mistake of 1. Accepting free drinks from him, 2. Going up to his room in that state. So I in no way put the full blame on him.

Now fast forward to today and you get you Social Justice Warriors who think that a victim has zero responsibility in their actions and I am telling you that you are full of it. You are not blameless. What you wear is important, your actions before hand are important and how you interact with a person are important. If you tease and tease someone, and then say “No no, no!” you are risking pushing that button on that person who is not mentally stable. If you accept drinks from strange men and then go home with them, expect they want to have sexual intercourse with you.

If you accept drinks from strangers, if you go home with strangers, then you run the risk of rape or sexual assault. There is a good chance you will be going home with someone decent. Don’t get me wrong there, but if you’re going home with a new guy every week or every few days, then the odds are pretty good that you will end up being a statistic.

Now, here is the advice. You are in control of your life. That means you have to accept responsibility for your actions, and as such, take precautions. Learn self-defense, carry pepper spray. Make sure a friend knows where you are going etc.

This is not taking any responsibility of a crime off the criminal. What this does is help stop you from becoming a victim and the crime from happening in the first place.

It’s like a car. You don’t go parking your car in a crime riddled neighborhood and leave the doors wide open and the keys in the ignition. If you did that and your car gets stolen, were you asking for it? Yes. The person who stole the car is still a criminal but you can bet your sweet ass you asked for it, by doing that.

Same with going home with strange men, teasing them, and then denying them sex. Most men will put up with that and respect your choice, but go through enough men and the odds are you will find one who won’t respect your saying No No.

I really hope this gets passed on and the message gets through to at least some people who believe that no victim is at fault for their actions because as I have just shown, that isn’t correct.