Introduction

This guide is written for teachers and students who are studying J.B. Priestley's play An Inspector Calls. The guide is written specifically for students in the UK, but I hope it may be helpful to users from other parts of the world. An Inspector Calls is a popular text for assessed work in drama for English and English literature exams. It may also be studied for teacher-assessed coursework in English in Key Stages 3 and 4 (GCSE reading).

If you want to buy An Inspector Calls, click on the relevant link below.

Eva's letter

The Inspector tells Mr. Birling that Eva Smith/Daisy Renton left a letter and a sort of diary. The letter could be to her nearest relative or to Gerald Croft. Write - as you imagine Eva would have done - the letter and diary entries (between 1910 and 1912) for the key events in her life, from her starting to work for Birling & Co. to her suicide.

Year and month

What happens

September 1910

Eva sacked by Birling & Co.

December 1910

Eva employed by Milwards.

Late January 1911

Eva sacked by Milwards.

March 1911

Eva becomes Gerald's mistress.

Early September 1911

Gerald breaks off the affair.

Eva leaves Brumley for two months.

November 1911

Eric meets Eva.

December 1911/January 1912

Eva finds she is pregnant.

Late March 1912

Mrs. Birling turns down Eva's application for help.

Early April 1912

Eva's suicide/the Inspector calls*

(*Dated by Titanic's maiden voyage.) The diary is also mentioned on pages 179 and 193 (Penguin edition).

Eva's life - the media version

Suppose that Eva's diary is discovered by a journalist who decides to present an item on her suicide for a Brumley newspaper, or for a local radio or TV broadcast (this is strictly anachronistic but could be done as a modern retrospective account). In a newspaper this could be a single report, or a series over several days (as comments are made by the Birlings, Gerald Croft and their solicitors). A broadcast account would perhaps take longer to prepare - but might still be inaccurate.

Remember that not all of the people involved would tell the truth (or the whole truth) about what happened. Try to obtain interviews/comments from some of the characters in the play and others, such as:

Eva's work-mates at Birling & Co. or Milwards;

the woman who wanted Eva to go to the Palace bar (clearly a kind of agent for Brumley's prostitutes),

Responsibility

The most important theme of the play, it could be argued, is responsibility.

See how often the words responsible and responsibility appear, and in what senses.

At the beginning of the play Mr. Birling gives his (limited) view of responsibility in a long speech. Mr. Birling's definition of responsibility is immediately followed by the arrival of the Inspector. The Inspector gives his (very wide) explanation of responsibility immediately before he leaves.

How do Mr. Birling's earlier comments on the unlikelihood of war, the probable success of capitalists in eliminating strikes and on the unsinkability of the Titanic affect our view of what he says on responsibility? (The play's audience, in 1946, would be aware of two world wars, the General Strike and the sinking of the Titanic).

Is Mr. Birling a hard-headed businessman, as he claims, or a hard-hearted character?

Sheila is worried earlier in the play by her mother's self-righteous denial of blame. After the Inspector goes she is worried by the attempt to dismiss his visit as a mere practical joke.

Consider the idea that the Inspector, by his visit, gives the family a second chance which is lost by the failure of the majority to learn their lesson.

How significant in determining the play's conclusion is Gerald's eventually siding with the view of the parents (The Inspector has foreseen a suicide about to happen. They may, by a change of heart, prevent it - but the chance is missed and the suicide occurs).

Who is the Inspector?

Who or what is the Inspector? In the text there are many clues. Examine each of these and try to interpret it. Write an essay, discussing how these clues and the Inspector's general behaviour contribute to the audience's idea of who he is and how correct his statements are.

The clues are:

The timing of his entry (noted by Eric);

His method of working: one person and one line of enquiry at a time (A policeman would not insist on this. A real policeman would interview people alone. This Inspector already knows; he wants the others to see what they have done.)

His asking Birling why he refused Eva's request for a pay rise.

His statement that it is his duty to ask questions.

His saying that he never takes offence.

His statement that he does not see much of the chief constable.

His failure to be alarmed by Birling's threats.

His reply to Birling's question: You sure of your facts? - Some of them - yes. Not all, because not all have happened yet: Eva Smith has not yet killed herself, it would seem.

His concern for moral law not for criminal law.

His statement: some things are left to me. Inquiries of this sort, for instance.

Sheila's recognition of his authority and supernatural knowledge - as shown in her warnings to Gerald and to her mother .

His statement about the impression he has made on Sheila: We often do on the young ones.

His impatience to get on with his questioning followed by his statement that he hasn't much time. A police officer would take as much time as was needed. It is as if he needs to finish before the moment at which Eva will decide whether or not to end her life.

His saying, I don't need to know any more, once he has shown the Birlings and Gerald what each has done.

His final speech, which has nothing to do with criminal law, but which is a lecture on social responsibiility and the perils of ignoring it.

The Birlings' discovery that no such officer is on the local police force.

The Inspector's telling Sheila there is no reason why she should understand about him

Eric's saying He was our police inspector all right followed by Sheila's comment Well, he inspected us all right

His foreknowledge of Eva's death.

His intimate knowledge of Eva's life and despite the fact that he never spoke to her

His prediction of a massive social catastrophe (fire and blood and anguish) which clearly refers (for the Birlings) to the First World War and (for the audience) to both World Wars.

In the 1954 film of An Inspector Calls, the Inspector does not leave the Birlings' house as in the play: he is left alone in Mr. Birling's study; Birling returns to ask him a question, and finds the room empty. Is this too blatant a way of suggesting that the Inspector is some kind of supernatural or angelic being? Some commentators on the play have suggested that his name contains a pun - it sounds like Ghoul.

A ghoul is an evil demon, which eats the flesh of the dead, or, metaphorically, a person obsessed by, or who profits by, another's death. After he has gone the Inspector is said by Birling to have exploited Eva's alleged death to frighten the victims of his supposed practical joke. Is it more important to know who the Inspector is, or what he has to say? Should Priestley (the playwright) have made him more obviously spooky?

Write an essay discussing the character of the Inspector, his method of discovering the truth, the effect he has on each of the other characters, both while he is with them and after he has gone. Give your view of who (or what) he is, and why you think this.

What next?

At the end of the play there are many possibilities, and we cannot say with certainty what might happen.

Will the Birlings try to persuade their children to conceal the truth from the real Inspector who is coming?

Will Sheila and Eric insist on openness?

Where will Gerald stand now? (After his clever theory has been disproved - will he realise that Daisy Renton told him of her two sackings? He knew that at least Mr. Birling, Sheila and himself had all influenced the same girl!)

Continue the story either as a play-script or as a third-person narrative with conversation. You may, if you wish, continue beyond the arrival of the real police officer. He or she, of course, is not likely to exert the same power over the Birlings and Gerald as the Inspector of the play has.

1912 and 1946

This task is suitable for treatment as a written or spoken response. You should consider the question of why a play first performed in 1946 should be set in 1912. Why does Priestley choose this particular time?

In order to answer this you should consider the following points:

The play opens with a scene of great luxury: a wealthy family is celebrating an engagement in a very lavish fashion. This will be obvious to an audience that has spent the years of the Second World War without the luxuries that the Birlings are so abundantly enjoying (rationing of many luxury - and basic - goods continued into the 1950s). Although Churchill (a Conservative) is seen as a war hero for leading the fight against Nazism (he led a coalition government of Labour, Conservative and Liberal elements) a Socialist government has won a landslide victory in the 1945 General Election. Priestley was a supporter of the Labour party, and made many broadcasts on radio in which he tried to persuade people of the merits of socialism.

In order to do this, Priestley sets the play in a time before there was a welfare state in the United Kingdom, and when employers had great power over their workers.

Mr. Birling's idea of progress

What is Mr. Birling's view of the likely results of technological change (see his comments on cars and aeroplanes)?

Is he right to link scientific advances with progress in politics and international relations? Why does he believe that there will be no war? How far do we trust his judgement? What do we know that he does not about the future? Consider his comment that the Titanic is unsinkable.

Young men and wild oats

This play depicts a common situation from the early years of the 20th century - young women from the middle classes would not be sexually active before marriage. This has nothing to do with virtue - but much to do with securing a good match. (After marrying, or even becoming widowed or divorced, middle-class and wealthy women could be more active if they chose.) But poorer women could sometimes be seduced in return for material rewards (that would not be so attractive to those with wealth of their own).

How does Gerald's relationship with Eva reflect the moral atttiudes of his class at this time?

Do you think that it is right for Gerald to begin his affair with Eva, when he has no real commitment to her, and would not consider marrying her?

Why can Gerald not marry Eva, and why is he quite ready to marry Sheila Birling, when it is obvious that he does not really love her?

What do we learn from the various references in the play to the Palace Theatre, women of the town and the woman who wanted Eva to go to the Theatre bar?

How does Eric's relationship with Eva reinforce the idea that women of Eva's class can be used as playthings by the wealthy, and then discarded?

Conclusion

When you have looked at all of these ideas, you should consider the question in a more general sense:

The Inspector, in his final speech, tries to show how both the First World War, and the Second, which had just ended when Priestley wrote the play, were the result of attitudes and behaviour such as those of powerful and wealthy families like the Birlings.

This may explain why all the worst features of such families seem to be present in the Birlings: they represent the worst qualities of their class.

Do you think Priestley has made the play's argument more convincing by the inclusion in it of such people, or are they too awful to be believable?

This play is set in 1912. In what ways might you argue that it has a relevance, not only to the Britain of 1946, but also to the country as it is today?

Use of evidence

This is critical. Always give examples or refer to details in the story to support your comments. You may use quotation, too: lots of short quotation (where the point of quoting is obvious) is better than very lengthy quotations of less obvious relevance. When you quote, introduce with a comma or colon (, or :), and enclose what you quote in inverted commas.