G20 PROTEST

April 4, 2009

After the G20 PROTEST “DAVID ICKE” HAS PUT IT BETTER THEN I CAN, SO HERE IT IS.

‘Protesters stormed the Royal Bank of Scotland in London as thousands of people descended on the City ahead of the G20 summit of world leaders. Demonstrators launched missiles and forced their way into the bank after clashes with police in the capital. A branch of HSBC also had windows broken.

Twenty-four people were arrested and some police and protesters injured. Climate change activists have pitched tents in the street, while anti-war campaigners are holding a rally.’

Okay, let’s just take a deep breath here, engage some consciousness, and look at this again.

(1) People have been protesting in the streets of London and elsewhere for decade after decade. They’ve protested against the Iraq invasion, but Iraq was invaded; they’ve protested against world poverty, but world poverty continues to grow; they’ve protested against ‘globalisation’ (while often denying there is a conspiracy to centralise global power) but globalisation moves on ever-faster.

(2) A major element of the protests in London this week is for policies to ‘fight global warming’ when human-caused ‘global warming’, or ‘climate change’, is a manufactured scam, a ‘scientific’ insanity, to justify massive economic and Orwellian impositions to hand still more power to the few over the many. In short, the ‘protestors’ are telling the manipulators to do what they always intended to do.

(3) How many more times is the British politician Tony Benn going to be wheeled out to say the same things that he’s said for decade after decade when they are always followed by what he is protesting about happening anyway?? Don’t get me wrong, I agree with much of what Tony Benn has said at protest rally after protest rally over the decades, but the point I am making is WHAT HAS IT EVER CHANGED??

The same with the mass protests – WHAT HAVE THEY EVER CHANGED THAT THE ELITE DIDN’T WANT TO BE CHANGED ANYWAY??

The system doesn’t fear protest; indeed it wants it to justify ever-more control to ‘keep the peace’.

What it fears is not protest, but non-violent non-cooperation because without the acquiescence of the people in general it cannot function and cannot continue to enslave us. Did the protests today affect these people? Of course, not. But if the population en masse stopped cooperating – peacefully – with their own enslavement every day these guys would cancel the laxative order.

Why protest when we can refuse to comply? How many people are doing the controlling? A relative handful. How many are being controlled? Closing in on seven billion.

I think I see a way out of this. And it isn’t mass protest. It is mass non-cooperation or, to use the American term, non-compliance. ———————————————————