ilikebaseball wrote:Quick question... I have 5 PT's left, but I am completely out of drilling shit. What does a brother do on non-PT days?

drill some stuff you've done before

That's what Im asking though. How do you drill stuff you've done before when you've written all over it and what not? My pencil never stops moving. I write ALLLL over the stimulus. I literally cross out words to negate. I use circles, underlines, parenthesis, etc.

ilikebaseball wrote:Quick question... I have 5 PT's left, but I am completely out of drilling shit. What does a brother do on non-PT days?

drill some stuff you've done before

That's what Im asking though. How do you drill stuff you've done before when you've written all over it and what not? My pencil never stops moving. I write ALLLL over the stimulus. I literally cross out words to negate. I use circles, underlines, parenthesis, etc.

ilikebaseball wrote:Quick question... I have 5 PT's left, but I am completely out of drilling shit. What does a brother do on non-PT days?

drill some stuff you've done before

That's what Im asking though. How do you drill stuff you've done before when you've written all over it and what not? My pencil never stops moving. I write ALLLL over the stimulus. I literally cross out words to negate. I use circles, underlines, parenthesis, etc.

did u not scan your stuff come on ppl u need to scan this stuff lsat material is not a one n done thing scan scan scan also i like to review do games more maybe examine wrong answer choices n stuff like that after my rc debacle this weekend im doing rc from 60-70 again

this thread is pretty awesome like 95% of them time maybe another sept thread should splinter off from this 1 so ppl who dont like the gang ITT can do their own thing it will b called the "great civil war of the sept 2014 LSAT takers"

BillPackets wrote:this thread is pretty awesome like 95% of them time maybe another sept thread should splinter off from this 1 so ppl who dont like the gang ITT can do their own thing it will b called the "great civil war of the sept 2014 LSAT takers"

Louis1127 wrote:If a stimulus says that "X always Y", could a flaw be "Maybe the future is not like the past"?

No, right? Because the stimulus says x ----Y.

Right?

I am overthinking this and it may be time for my last study break before resuming on Wed or something lolz.

Hi Louis! I think it depends on if that statement is a premise or a conclusion of the argument. If the conclusion (based on some sketchy premises) is that "Therefore, X always Y," then, yes, it could definitely be a flaw. But if "X always Y" is a premise, then I would say probably not.

After the Civil War/War of Party Aggression I'd vote for Bill and Hand on the Party Party presidential ticket. You two could then appoint the rest of us ITT to your cabinet or cush judgeships. Let us all cast our un(der)employment fears aside.

hetookmetoamovie wrote:After the Civil War/War of Party Aggression I'd vote for Bill and Hand on the Party Party presidential ticket. You two could then appoint the rest of us ITT to your cabinet or cush judgeships. Let us all cast our un(der)employment fears aside.