Steven Oquendo, a 27-year-old police officer in Manhattan, had just gotten
off work when the crash occurred last July 31st. According to police,
Oquendo had the right-of-way when he struck Koval, who was crossing 12th
Avenue at 46th Street against the light. He was not charged in the crash.
But a DMV judge found grounds for a suspension this month after
questioning Oquendo during a mandatory administrative hearing.

At the May hearing, Judge Marc Berger heard new witness testimony alleging
that Oquendo was driving erratically when he struck and killed Koval.
According to the witness, an Uber passenger, Oquendo accelerated quickly
after the light changed at 46th Street and "suddenly changed lanes"
before impact.

Berger did not have the Collision Investigation Squad report for Koval's
case, a file that details the entire NYPD investigation, including witness
testimony. The Kovals' attorney did his own legwork to track down
the witness.

"I think it's super important that the judge saw that it was very
possible that this driver was not obeying the law," Bobbi Koval,
Jack's mother, told Gothamist Monday. "There are definitely some
question marks in my mind. It's the first time we've gotten the
idea, being told for nine months that it was Jack's fault, that it
really probably wasn't."

Jack, who graduated from Emory University last spring, moved to New York
City shortly after July 4th, 2016 to start a job as an analyst at Centerview
Partners, a financial advisory firm. He was killed later that month. A
preliminary police report included a false account of the circumstances: he did not, as was
originally reported, jump a divider and step into oncoming traffic before he was killed.

DMV hearings, which are mandatory following any fatal crash, are held to
determine whether a driver demonstrated "gross negligence" and
acted "in a manner showing a reckless disregard for life or property
of others," possibly meriting a license suspension or revocation.
Advocates fought for DMV hearings to be more effective in 2014, after
an administrative judge
dismissed two traffic tickets incurred by the driver who
struck and killed 3-year-old Allison Liao in a hearing that lasted less than a minute. In the years since, advocates
say the hearings have given some victims' families a degree of closure,
particularly considering that criminal charges against drivers are rare.

Attorney
Daniel Flanzig, who is representing the Kovals, said that even license suspensions are
not common.

"Obviously we'd rather see something more severe, but sanctions seem
to be so rare we're happy to see they did it," he told Gothamist.
"I've probably attended fifteen to twenty of these hearings.
This one, and [the estate of] Matt Brenner are the two where there has
been a revocation or suspension of a license."

Last August,
Flanzigrepresented the estate of Matthew Brenner, a cyclist who was struck and killed by driver Caitlin Venedam in July
2014. Venedam was not charged in the crash, but evidence presented in
the DMV hearing compelled a judge to revoke her license.
Flanzig presented evidence that Venedam had been distracted at the wheel, looking
at a GPS map on her phone. "Cops didn't have any of that,"
Flanzig said.

The Kovals plan to bring civil charges against Oquendo, and Flanzig said
that the administrative DMV decision could strengthen their civil case.
The DMV did not immediately provide the full decision on Oquendo's
case, which includes information about any violations of the vehicle traffic
law. "Any of those would be binding in a civil action,"
Flanzig said.

Oquendo testified during his DMV hearing that he changed lanes just before
the crash in order to avoid striking a black SUV in front of him. He also
denied allegations that he was speeding when he struck Koval.

"My condolences to your family and I'm sorry for your loss,"
Oquendo told the Kovals earlier this month. "I can't imagine
what you guys are going through. I wish it never happened. I think about
it every day. And, um, it's just an collision. I'm sorry that it
happened. I really am. I wish it didn't."

The information on this website is for general information purposes only.
Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual
case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt
or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.