The Canadian Sentinel

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Needs a day off.Every day off.Every day from now on ought to be known as...Robert Mueller's Day Off.Unlike Ferris Bueller, he's not funny.He is not in there to find the truth. He is a witch hunter targeting any and all Republicans. He already knows that there was never any collusion between Trump and Russia... not that there'd be anything illegal about that anyway, as we never saw Obama get investigated for his campaign's collusion with Iran, nor his and the Clintons' collusion with Russia on the uranium file.Robert Mueller is not an investigator, nor a lawman. He is merely a political subversion agent working for the Deep State. Why aren't Obama and the Clintons being investigated too? Hmm? Yup. Deep State won't allow it.

There can be no question as to the reality that the American economy has come totally roaring, booming back, and FAST... simply due to the election of Donald Trump and the expectation and implementation of various badly needed policies required for economic recovery.

And now that there's been major tax relief, the termination of the hated, unwanted, devastating Obamacare Mandate and now that Alaska will again have oil drilling... just watch the communists and America haters scream at it all... because they don't want America to be great.

Most Americans want America to be great. Only crazy extremists don't.

As for Canada under Justin Trudeau, the economic situation is the opposite. Rapid devastation. Extreme job haemmorhage. Termination of many enterprises. Rising taxes, inflation. Despair. How will Canadians survive?

To put it simply, Justin Trudeau is a monster in charge of the levers of power in Canada.

Never has Canada been in such horrible shape... and danger.

Economically, Trudeau 2.0 has been devastating, very much like his father was. And none of it is unforced error. After all, what does one expect of a communist dictator wannabe?

On the national security front, Justin Trudeau terminated Canada's war on the ISIS savage beastly war criminals, thus giving them breathing space... for a while, at least, until America under Donald Trump ordered the US military to hunt and destroy those barbarians (Justin Trudeau doesn't believe it's barbaric to chop peoples' heads off).

Then Trudeau threw open the borders to fake "Syrian" refugees (note the "fake"). Most of whom have been men of combat age, with very few women and children. And most have been Muslims, which is weird, as ISIS really targets NON-Muslims and leaves Muslims alone.

Then, Trudeau invited the illegal aliens in via our southern border, ordering police and border guards to be their bellboys and such, and allowing all illegal aliens to just stay and get free stuff, paid for by Canadian citizens who work for a living and pay a LOT of tax.

It gets worse. Unfortunately. And we're likely stuck with this little potato until 2019.

Monday, September 05, 2016

...and the Media dutifully refuses to ID the racist attackers as Muslims.

Funny how it seems that the progressive establishment and its tools invariably favor Muslims over everyone else. In this case, it favors Muslims over non-Muslim Chinese living in France. And it seems that the progressive establishment and its tools don't care about racism at all when the racists are Muslims.

This harassment of the Chinese near Paris has been going on for a
long time. It got so bad that at one point the Chinese ambassador to
France was forced to pay a visit to Aubervilliers to try to calm his
countrymen down. And in 2013, the Socialist mayor of Aubervilliers,
Jacques Salvator, suggested that the violence against them could be
halted if Chinese companies would agree to hire more Arabs and Africans.
The Chinese were not assuaged, countering that “Muslims do not work as
hard as the Chinese, that they are more demanding, and that they
complain too much.”Anyone familiar with Muslim work habits would need no
convincing.

Since that demonstration in Aubervilliers two weeks ago, apparently
little has been done to placate the Chinese. They described to reporters
covering their demonstration in Paris their feeling of frustration at
not being listened to by the French authorities who, they said, fail to
realize what kind of daily terror they endure. And in addition to the
attacks on Chinese who live in the suburbs, there has been a steady
increase in the number of attacks targeting Chinese (and Korean, and
Japanese) tourists in central Paris. These Asian tourists are known both
to buy luxury goods to take home with them, and to carry lots of cash.
Just the other day, a gang of six (unidentified men) jumped onto a bus
just about to leave a hotel for the airport, and made off with
luxury-filled luggage belonging to the 27 Chinese tourists on board. The
attackers in Aubervilliers have been identified as Muslims, but in the
stories about attacks on Chinese tourists the criminals are not
identified. But reading between the lines suggests that those attacking
the tourists, like those known to be attacking the Chinese in
Aubervilliers, are Muslims, and for a simple reason: had any of these
criminals been French, the press, which tends to protect Muslims, would
certainly have been eager to describe them as such. A refusal to
identify them, in the current climate, almost certainly means they were
Muslims.

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

The media is uncritical of far-left-wing extremist "protestors" (who
are almost always phony and frequently paid) who gather en masse at
non-left-wing events, including those for non-left-wing politicians
(like the US non-establishment Republicans and the Canadian
Conservatives, for example). They're uncritical of such "protestors" no
matter what the "protestors" say, what their signs say, of even what
they do. It doesn't matter if the "protestors" are uttering BIG LIES and DEFAMATION of the absolute worst kind, nor even if they engage in destruction and violence.

But call a left-wing politician a "liar" or a "socialist" or otherwise
speak the inconvenient truth of THEM... the media will go out of its way
to destroy you and yours in the eyes of the masses. If there
were to be protests against left-wing politicians such as Obama,
Hillary, Bernie or, in Canada, Trudeau, Wynne, Notley... including
hollering "no hate", "no racism", "no fascism", "they're like
Hitler/Nazis", etc... the media would demonize such protestors as, perhaps, "extremists", "racists", "neo-nazis", "far-left"... or may just
pretend that there were no protests at all (in the case of peaceful,
truth-based demonstrations, no matter how massive, such as the Tea Party
protests against Obama's agenda) or pretend it was just a "couple
hundred" when it was thousands strong. The media may even try to demonize such peaceful, truthful protests as being "a bunch of extremists/racists/far-right". Anyone disagree? Be
prepared to explain why, and state whether one is on top of current
events daily, including going over the heads of the "mainstream",
politically-correct, leftist media... or not.

Sunday, May 31, 2015

The “legacy of slavery” argument is not just an excuse for
inexcusable behavior in the ghettos. In a larger sense, it is an evasion
of responsibility for the disastrous consequences of the prevailing
social vision of our times, and the political policies based on that
vision, over the past half century.

Anyone who is serious about evidence need only compare black
communities as they evolved in the first 100 years after slavery with
black communities as they evolved in the first 50 years after the
explosive growth of the welfare state, beginning in the 1960s.

You would be hard-pressed to find as many ghetto riots prior to the
1960s as we have seen just in the past year, much less in the 50 years
since a wave of such riots swept across the country in 1965.

We are told that such riots are a result of black poverty and white
racism. But in fact — for those who still have some respect for facts —
black poverty was far worse, and white racism was far worse, prior to
1960. But violent crime within black ghettos was far less.

(...)

You cannot take any people, of any color, and exempt them from the
requirements of civilization — including work, behavioral standards,
personal responsibility, and all the other basic things that the clever
intelligentsia disdain — without ruinous consequences to them and to
society at large.

Non-judgmental subsidies of counterproductive lifestyles are treating
people as if they were livestock, to be fed and tended by others in a
welfare state — and yet expecting them to develop as human beings have
developed when facing the challenges of life themselves.

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

...are either motivated by cluelessness, gullibility... or ANTI-SEMITISM.

Frequently all of the above.

So it's extremely RICH when such brainwashed bigots accuse the staunchest supporters, those with the best record thereof, of both Israel and Judaism of being "anti-Semitic" and "racist" for laughable reasons/excuses.

First, some actual fact, to be fair and give the article due credit...

A federal election is expected this October, and this Tuesday the
Harper Conservatives shook up plans for campaign debates, saying they
would refuse to participate in the traditional leaders’ debates run by
the consortium of broadcasters and instead take part in as many as five
independently staged debates in the run-up to the fall federal election.

Now, for the opinion part...

The
decision by Mr. Harper’s Conservatives to walk away from the consortium
that has historically run these events will erode the power that major
broadcasters have had in determining how federal political leaders face
off on TV before elections.

It appears to be an effort by the
Tories to decrease the political weight of the debates by splitting them
into smaller events with smaller audiences where the Conservatives have
more leverage to achieve the format and focus that they feel suits them
as a right-of-centre incumbents.

The "Consortium" needs to check its arrogance. Why do they REALLY think they're FINALLY being snubbed? You and I know why. Because they are BIASED and unfair.

"Widest audience"? On live TV, including the bunny ears, sure. BUT... Hello... INTERNET REPLAY is now a reality! See the debates on your computer or your phone, too, at your demand and leisure! So the "Consortium" is mistaken to delude itself into believing that "only it" can be the way to go. Not anymore, Consortium of commie broadcasters!

Again, Prime Minister Stephen Harper (Conservative) demonstrates precisely HOW to go over the heads of the crony-capitalist, corruptocratic, politically-correct, unfair-and-unbalanced corporate media, which includes the source for this posting, the G&M, connected via corporate messaging control, as well as simply corporately, to the CTV, which is part of the "Consortium". And, by the way, the G&M article, which fails to self-ID as "commentary-opinion", rather than hard news, is obviously opinion-compromised. MY analysis, or the G&M's analysis- whose will you trust? At least I get NO money for my opinion and it's 100% of my own independent, non-controlled, non-coerced prompting.

Again, the G&M's article demonstrates the core of the trouble with the corporate, big-money, crony-capitalist, controlled, politically-correct, leftwards-biased media: Combining some fact with a lot of opinion. And thusly manipulating the lazy-minded masses, who don't like to think for themselves and frequently simply, lazily accept "mainstream" Consortium opinion as if factual statement.

The Left Wing, we know very well, claimed that the now-gone-thanks-to-unfair-treatment-by-the-CRTC (regardless of its head having been appointed by whomever, such appointment proving nothing as to ideological control whatsoever by the federal government, as alleged by the Left in its attempts to blame it all on Conservative control) SUN News was "biased opinion", but failed to accept that there was always a hard-news component, separated from the straight-talk component. They alleged there was a seamless melding of the news and opinion parts, a big lie they told out of dishonesty... while failing to admit that the "Consortium" is itself guilty of doing this with staggering frequency.

This new way of going about election debates is refreshing, groundbreaking and progressive due to contemporary technology. So the "Consortium" is just being arrogant. Too bloody bad for the "Consortium".

Watch the debates live on cable, or wait a little bit to see them online at your demand. That's the way things are... now. Who needs the dinosaury, arrogant, manipulative-messaging "Consortium" anyway, anymore?

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Barack Obama is a Fabian socialist. I should know; I was raised by one. My Grandfather worked as a union machinist for
Ingersoll Rand
during the day. In the evenings he tended bar and read
books. After his funeral, I went back home and started working my way
through his library, starting with T.W. Arnold’s The Folklore of Capitalism. This was my introduction to the Fabian socialists.

Fabians believed in gradual nationalization of the economy through
manipulation of the democratic process. Breaking away from the violent
revolutionary socialists of their day, they thought that the only real
way to effect “fundamental change” and “social justice” was through a
mass movement of the working classes presided over by intellectual and
cultural elites. Before TV it was stage plays, written by George Bernard
Shaw and thousands of inferior “realist” playwrights dedicated to
social change. John Cusack’s character in Woody Allen’s “Bullets Over
Broadway” captures the movement rather well.

Arnold taught me to question everyone–my president, my priest and my
parents. Well, almost everyone. I wasn’t supposed to question the Fabian
intellectuals themselves. That’s the Fabian MO, relentless cultural and
journalistic attacks on everything that is, and then a hard pitch for
the hope of what might be.

That’s Obama’s world.

He’s telling the truth when he says that he doesn’t agree with Bill
Ayers’ violent bombing tactics, but it’s a tactical disagreement. Why
use dynamite when mass media and community organizing work so much
better? Who needs Molotov when you’ve got Saul Alinski?

As Canada Free Press columnist William Kevin Stoos wrote here yesterday.
“The Fabian Window is a beautiful, if sinister, thing. Although it
currently hangs in London, it should be hanging in the White House, for
the message in the window is an eerie reflection of what is happening in
the United States before our very eyes. Built to commemorate the
founding of the Fabian Socialist Society, the Fabian Window contains
images that are clear, unapologetic and, as a friend of mine once
said..brazen. It is one thing, as Lenin said, to howl like wolves in
order to live among wolves; however it is quite another to advertise the
fact that you are a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Yet, the socialists who
constructed the window had no qualms about advertising the fact that
they had a hidden (or not so hidden) agenda when it comes to reshaping
the world.”

The wolf at the door is not a Made in America problem. It is a made in the Free World problem.

The Fabian Society casts all doubt aside about what Obama really is:
He’s the quintessential Socialist wolf in sheep’s clothing being used
to shape a new world.

Not only Obama, but also Justin Trudeau (just like his father Pierre Trudeau). Obviously.