Hot Topics:

User Profile: BrutalTruth

Comments

Wow, mocking a person mocking you. Difference is that your’s is simply a personal attack that doesn’t have any logic to it or point to it. You couldn’t do a better job of showing people how much of a moron you are if you tried.

You seem to totally ignore the obvious. Of course, you chastise one side, but not the other. The question is why don’t you see other human beings as equals? Do you speak out equally against the “black” message?

We are all equal and should be treated equally and we should have the same reaction regardless of who is behaving badly. Otherwise, we don’t truly believe what we say we believe.

“What effect do you think the death penalty really has on them then? Certainly NOT as a deterrent – right?”

Zap has no ability to come to any rational thought as proven by this comment. Totally ignores the fact that it keeps that particular offender from ever committing another crime. But past that, offers no rational thought on why it couldn’t possibly be a deterrent, just declares that it can’t.

Your concern for the innocent is commendable, but your position only guarantees that the guilty are not only not punished, but are available to commit future crimes. So you throw rational thought down the drain to prop up your feelings which are on full display from your last comment on how you really don’t want a discussion on the death penalty. People who are on shaky footing rarely want their delusions exposed. They even tend to get angry.

And to even address your first question, Yes, laws only affect the law abiding “IF” the law isn’t enforced. That’s the rub, isn’t it. You claim to want the law, but then piss your pants when they are enforced and you find an overwhelming number of your precious preferred people incarcerated. You talk out of both sides of your mouth.

The entire post is evidence of one who does not use thinking to arrive at the truth. You reference thinking as any idea necessary to hold to an ideology. It might make you feel good, but in the end, you’re just wrong.

The guy was a professional victim. For the first time in his life he had to take off the victim hat when he took the roll of LE. I'm not surprised this took place in Sheriff Joe's department. Common sense wins!!

[28] January 8, 2015 at 8:44am

328orion responded:

WILLFUL IGNORANCE !

[46] January 8, 2015 at 11:46am

CCulotta responded:

I believe he suffered from Armchair Quaterback Syndrome. A common affliction in this country.

[18] January 8, 2015 at 2:24pm

b1lancer responded:

No, its not rocket science. A person really must REFUSE to understand something so fundamental and instead embrace the narrative that best suits his agenda. I think I detected a somewhat 'sheepish' smile on his face toward the end as he was explaining his new appreciation for how quickly decisions have to be made.

[12] January 8, 2015 at 11:29pm

OldOllie responded:

Simple -- like most liberals, he was blinded by hate.

[6] January 9, 2015 at 7:19am

terlynn responded:

No, it's not rocket science, but unless you've been in that type of situation or gone through that type of training you don't truly understand the police side of it. It's a whole lot different looking in from outside than it is being in that situation.

[1] January 1, 2015 at 3:44pm

Only problem, Tired, is you seem to desire to follow and know some parts of scripture, but totally ignore the vast majority of it. His love and mercy cannot violate His justice. He’s Holy.

The Bible is either true or it isn’t. Do we just ignore the parts that are uncomfortable?

She should've told him, "I Hope you find your joy anyway. Somewhere!"
Seems like he should've wore his 'rainy cloud over his head' hat so everyone would know he was Scrooge-ing. And you've got two options. 1) steer clear of him or 2) pester the hell out of him, make him earn that 'rainy cloud' hat.

[6] December 26, 2014 at 2:35am

bondroid responded:

LOL! Excellent! Here's your sign!

[5] December 26, 2014 at 9:00am

PatriotGal2 responded:

Absolutely, Brutel. We celebrate Christ and will say so. If they don't like it, tough.

[7] December 23, 2014 at 11:15am

Yes, the Soviets used to use this line of intimidation to push their agenda.

Unfortunately, you’ve had many, many years of the things you say are good, but we’ve seen education levels decline. You simply refuse to see the correlation and revert to the old Soviet tactics. You’re a good Comrade.

You gloss over the “arrest” part to jump to rationalize the “resisting” part. Start by accepting “don’t commit crimes” and then accept “do not resist arrest” or else nothing else matters.

If you were a Marine, as you claim, please tell me what would happen if as a boot, you figured your better to decide which lawful orders to follow and which not to follow?

This was a matter of a person who was more interested in doing as he pleased on a repeating pattern than caring about what was right or wrong and the natural laws of decisions have consequences finally caught up with him. Trying to argue otherwise only makes the arguer look foolish.

If you want to hold that the officers maneuver was wrong, fine. But try to keep the two things separate and deal with each separate.