No advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion.

No posts about bannings by other moderators (too common, not relevant to topic of "rights")

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites.

Spam/Off-Topic posts will be removed. Use self-posts for related topics, justifying their relation.

Facebook posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names.

Absolutely no doxxing will be tolerated.

Advocating for violence/illegal acts may be removed.

Links to other subreddits must use NP format ("np" in place of "www").

Young accounts are given no tolerance.

/r/MensRights strongly supports principles of free speech. People posting here are sharing their opinions. Opinions will not be removed, but actions may (see above rules). Please do not hesitate to send us a modmail if a user is violating the rules.

4 down votes for showing people where to find quality sources dealing with Child safety from Sexual Predators/Paedophiles?

It's fascinating to see that 16% of readers seem to support sexual abuse - and that is within 1% of the findings of NPSCC/Childline for identified female paedophiles: with a gap to 32% to still fill - meaning the number could be as high as 50% of all paedophiles being female.

It is an interesting co-coincidence, is it?

Keep Voting it down Girls - the more the merrier and clearer it all gets!

Note - at time of writing it was 21 up votes (84% like it) and 4 down votes (16%).

Like so many you seem to need to develop an ability to sit back and see a bigger picture, rather than fixate on issues and then contextualise them.

I am still amazed by those who keep missing long-standing data, information, quotations and so much more that 100% support the MRA position ... but get left on the side.

When “Female Sexual Abuse of Children The Last Taboo” was published 1992 the authors lives were threatened - they received repeated threat and attack from Feminists for saying that Women Sexually Abused Children Too? ... and they have been saying the same thing for over 20 years.

I'm having a hard timing believing you're earnest when little issues like that just pass you by. I'm glad that others don't share your lack and have welcomed so much info and sources that have allowed them to address so many issues around the Cult of rape that feminism thrives on.

Sure. Let's begin with the ad hominems. You've been claiming everyone who downvotes you is some kind of feminist shill. You can't know that for sure (this is the internet), so you're attempting to frame an "if you're not with me, you're against me" argument, which is transparent and ineffective here. We've all been in debates with idiots that use this rhetoric, and it's a good reason you're being downvoted.

Second, you didn't provide a clear analysis or premise, choosing instead to vaguely allude to conspiratorial elements within Reddit and feminism through your comments. A single, concise comment stating your intent would have been perfect. What you did only served to "muddle" your point.

Third, your sentence structure is often incoherent and fragmented. Additionally, you capitalize words which aren't meant to be capitalized. "Cretin" is not a proper noun. Neither is "muddle". You need to take a serious look at your structure. Ensure there's a beginning, middle, and end. Address each premise in turn. Dmaul, above, corrected you. You were clearly wrong, but then you shifted focus. It's a dishonest argumentative tactic, and it's also something we're very familiar with here.

Ironically, you're arguing like the run-of-the-mill feminist. I expect better of users here.

It is with some interest and amusement that i find to day that page 100 of Michelle Elliott's Excellent Book has been made to vanish off Google Books.

It's enough to have people wondering if there are not internal issues within google of pro feminist censorship and denial of reality! Can't allow any references that deal with sexual abuse of children by Women and how Feminism gets i the way of protecting the innocent for political shenanigans.

“Whilst there are reasons why feminists limit discussion on the subject of women abusers, these reasons are valid only to feminism.” from “Female Sexual Abuse of Children The Last Taboo” published 1992 - page 100.