58 Comments on this post:

By:jvh2b on 10/28/11 at 2:05

I can't speak for the OWS peeps as I'm not out there with them.

Personally, I think a great start would be limit the amount of monies a corporation can give to a person running for/in office. To further that, the politician can also only receive monies from people in their states or that have a business in that state.

That one should make loner happy since it would effectively take control of congress from the jooooos ;)

By:Loner on 10/28/11 at 2:15

You rang?

By:jvh2b on 10/28/11 at 2:23

Just expressing a little support for ya is all

By:brrrrk on 10/28/11 at 2:30

Here's an interesting question.....

In many states voting or participating in the election process is forfeited by anyone who commits a Federal offense. Now, since many of the top Fortune 500 companies have bee convicted and fined for committing Federal crimes, shouldn't they also be banned from participating in elections (financially and otherwise) in those states where regular humans are prevented from doing the same. After all, the Supreme Court has assumed that corporations are people.

By:Loner on 10/28/11 at 2:36

Helen Thomas understated the problem. Check out who got what from lobbyists representing the Jewish state - a faith-based, apartheid state outside our union of American states that pays nothing in US taxation...the Israelis receive US taxes, they do not pay them.

http://maplight.org/us-congress/interest/J5100/view/all

Notice how all that cash is only for the most recent election cycle....the long-term incumbents have pulled in millions from these foreign agents. Nearly every Senator and most Reps are on the take....check it out.

This kind of legal bribery is why Netanyahu got 36 standing ovations when Bohener and Cantor invited the Israeli PM to address Congress, last May. Cameras were recording who jumped to their feet and wildly clapped their hands and who remained sitting....the handful of sitters will be eliminated next election cycle...one can safely bet on that.

Yeah, I know, I'm a bigot for bitching about it....a real loner.

By:Loner on 10/28/11 at 3:05

I like that line of reasoning, Brrrrk. Any corporation that has committed a felony should be barred from contributing, or participating....just like us mortals.

I'm sure the robed Supremes would find a way to disagree with the logic of that, however....Bush the Elder and Bush the Younger installed most of these jokers....Obama added another Catholic and another Jew.....as instructed by his backers, no doubt. The current USSC is hardly representative of the US as a whole...the 9-member court is made up of 6 Roman Catholics and three Jews....Catholics are less than 20% and Jews are less than 2% of the US population. Apparently, Jews and Catholics are smarter and more "judicial" than the rest of us; hence their disproportionate representation on the highest court.

One third of our US Supreme Court, the Jewish block, are eligible to be Israeli citizens, just by entering Israeli airspace or crossing the border into the faith-based pariah state. One third of our top court has this dual allegiance conflict of interests....oh yeah, Helen Thomas understated the problem.

Again, I reckon I'm just a bigot for bitching about that too.

By:brrrrk on 10/28/11 at 3:11

Loner,

I think that most people in this country don't realize that there's a significant difference between the average run of the mill Jewish citizen of Israel (many of whom actually support the two state solution) and the Zionists that have taken over the government.

By:Loner on 10/28/11 at 3:22

No Brrrrk, they understand very little and do not want to know the ugly facts. Most folks are scared witless of being branded an anti-Semite.

Go to the Jpost, Haaretz and Ynet sites...the average Israeli is even more rabid than their government, Brrrrk....there is no Israeli left....they are a nation of hardened military vets and religious fanatics. They would stab us in the back for a few shekels.