jQuery Core: Ticket Queryhttp://bugs.jquery.com/query?status=closed&component=misc&milestone=1.4.3&group=resolution&order=priority
The Core jQuery libraryen-USjQuery Corehttp://static.jquery.com/files/rocker/images/logo_jquery_215x53.gifhttp://bugs.jquery.com/query?status=closed&component=misc&milestone=1.4.3&group=resolution&order=priority
Trac 0.12.1http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6515
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6515#6515: API docs steal arrow keys [documentation bug]Sun, 02 May 2010 23:02:31 GMTwhatcould<p>
API docs should not hijack arrow keys for custom behavior.
</p>
<p>
<strong>To reproduce:</strong>
Attempt to use arrow keys to scroll page, like every other website
</p>
<p>
<strong>Expected result:</strong>
Page scrolls
</p>
<p>
<strong>Current result:</strong>
Page jumps abruptly to the "focused" method
</p>
<p>
Maybe you could use j/k for up/down? Hijacking arrow keys is a usability nightmare.
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6515#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6857
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6857#6857: JQuery execution fails in FF and IE when typed in address bar.Sun, 01 Aug 2010 04:49:58 GMTTidenburg<p>
In the address bar, when I try a command like:
javascript: $('body').hide();
</p>
<p>
In google chrome, it performs the desired action. However, if I type this in on FF or IE I get moved to a page displaying "[Object object]".
</p>
<p>
However normal javascript works fine. Even if I try with normal javascript first and then a jquery command, it performs the normal JS, then diverts to the page.
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6857#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6403
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6403#6403: Website error: Versions page doesn't show versionsTue, 06 Apr 2010 16:55:58 GMTsgbeal<p>
<a class="ext-link" href="http://api.jquery.com/category/version/" rel="nofollow"><span class="icon"> </span>http://api.jquery.com/category/version/</a>
</p>
<p>
Each entry says "New in !", with the version number missing from their text.
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6403#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6879
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6879#6879: Add custom comparator to inArrayThu, 05 Aug 2010 22:54:10 GMTkbwood<p>
As an enhancement, add a third parameter to inArray that is a callback function for a custom equality comparison. This would allow for the matching of custom objects within an array without having to have a reference to the original object. For example, you could find a Date within an array like this:
</p>
<p>
var d1 = new Date(2010, 1-1, 1);
</p>
<p>
var d2 = new Date(2010, 2-1, 1);
</p>
<p>
var d3 = new Date(2010, 1-1, 1);
</p>
<p>
var dates = [d1, d2];
</p>
<p>
var index = $.inArray(d3, dates, function(a, b) {
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
return a.getTime() == b.getTime();
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
});
</p>
<p>
Maybe there could even be common comparators built-in, such as the date one above.
</p>
<p>
$.comparator.date = function(a, b) {
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
return a.getTime() == b.getTime();
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
};
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6879#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6984
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6984#6984: animations - tweeningWed, 01 Sep 2010 21:13:14 GMTjeremy-t<p>
Uh, I noticed that we don't have tweening implemented in any of our nice jQuery animations here...
</p>
<p>
There are only speed of animations, which follow a steady animation timeline.
</p>
<p>
If you would like me to spend the time to implement time-based motion tweening (such as penner's algs for flash), I can easily do that in javascript and should be able to add that to these animations and effects...
</p>
<p>
Reply if you want this, don't if you don't. If it's not something you think would benefit jQuery, I'm not going to spend the time to do it. However, it would make the effects 'nicer'..
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6984#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6311
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6311#6311: Problem with table row show / hide on firefox3.6Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:43:11 GMTfernando<p>
Hello
</p>
<p>
We have a table with some lines are hide. The user has the option, trough a link, show them. It was working until the last Firefox upgrade. We are using the show effect to display the hide rows.
</p>
<p>
On the Firefox 3.6, after call the show method ($(".cls_receita").show()), the css attribute "display" is setted as "block". In all of other browser, this property is setted as "table-row".
</p>
<p>
When the property is setted as "block" all line (&lt;tr&gt;) is display on a unique column. That can be seen on the attached files, one of them on the Firefox 3.6 and another on the Firefox 3.5.8.
</p>
<p>
Thank you.
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6311#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6482
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6482#6482: Trac "About" page not definedSun, 25 Apr 2010 22:56:26 GMTd3developer<p>
Get this error:
</p>
<p>
UndefinedError: "about" not defined
</p>
<p>
when attempting to visit the "About Trac" page
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6482#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6216
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6216#6216: [Patch] Drop-in replacement for jQuery's trim() functionThu, 04 Mar 2010 08:43:00 GMTmgruner<p>
Inspired by <a class="ext-link" href="http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/faster-trim-javascript" rel="nofollow"><span class="icon"> </span>http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/faster-trim-javascript</a>, I developed a trim() function that is just a little slower than the current, regexp-replacement based solution in jQuery 1.4.2 for very short strings (&lt; 50 characters). It is, however, MUCH faster for longer and very long strings. Depending on the browser, the speed improvement compared to the current implementation can be several orders of magnitude. Please see the attached patch.
</p>
<p>
Best regards and wishes for the success of jQuery,
Martin Gruner
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6216#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6599
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6599#6599: dev.jquery.com - trac - need 'forgot password' linkTue, 25 May 2010 22:13:10 GMTelijahr<p>
There should be a 'forgot password' link for users of the trac system @ http<em>dev.jquery.com/
</em></p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6599#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6637
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6637#6637: jQuery Website shows mouse pointer anomaly on front page.Sat, 05 Jun 2010 22:51:07 GMTtrusktr<p>
The glitch appears only when moving in and out of the "buy now" buttons from the top of the button in the "books about jquery" section.
</p>
<p>
The mouse pointer appears to be enlarged fr a farction of a second.
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6637#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7097
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7097#7097: Using assignment '=' in if statement of JQuery library fileWed, 29 Sep 2010 14:44:47 GMTnalleniv<p>
Did you intend to write an assignment in these statements with single '=' vs. double '=='?
</p>
<p>
Line 2800: if ( (match = Expr.leftMatch[ type ].exec( expr )) ) {
Line 2940: if ( (elem = checkSet[i]) ) {
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7097#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7106
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7106#7106: jQuery.parseJSON fails on ChromeThu, 30 Sep 2010 16:45:39 GMTlgpueyo<p>
When parsing the attached json with jQuery.parseJSON, a SyntaxException is raised under Chrome (6.0.472.63). Solution is to modify lines in jquery-1.4.2.js from 511:
</p>
<p>
&lt;code&gt;
return window.JSON &amp;&amp; window.JSON.parse ?
window.JSON.parse( data ) :
(new Function("return " + data))();
&lt;/code&gt;
</p>
<p>
with the following:
</p>
<p>
&lt;code&gt;
if ( window.JSON &amp;&amp; window.JSON.parse ) {
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
try{return window.JSON.parse( data );}catch(e){return(new Function("return " + data))()}
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
} else {
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
return (new Function("return " + data))();
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
}
&lt;/code&gt;
</p>
<p>
Cheers.
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/7106#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6290
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6290#6290: Inconsistent $.inArray behaviorMon, 15 Mar 2010 13:56:27 GMTtimmolendijk<p>
Firefox (3.6 for OS X), Chrome (5 for OS X), Safari (4):
$.inArray(undefined, []) === -1
</p>
<p>
Internet Explorer (7 &amp; 8):
$.inArray(undefined, []) === null
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6290#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6436
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6436#6436: website demosWed, 14 Apr 2010 10:55:46 GMTgemcoder<p>
HI
</p>
<p>
Demos on this page are not working because of the JS error:
</p>
<p>
<a class="ext-link" href="http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Effects/hide" rel="nofollow"><span class="icon"> </span>http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Effects/hide</a>
</p>
<p>
My browser is FF 3.6 (linux)
</p>
<p>
Firebug gives me this:
</p>
<p>
missing ) after argument list
[Break on this error] }catch(e){}});
</p>
<p>
And to be honest there is no section on your website to report website bugs :)
</p>
<p>
Regards
Pawel Barcik
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6436#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6520
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6520#6520: Documentation demos for Effects don't appear to workTue, 04 May 2010 05:47:20 GMTasha79<p>
Any of the Effects demos on: -
</p>
<p>
<a class="ext-link" href="http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Effects" rel="nofollow"><span class="icon"> </span>http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Effects</a>
</p>
<p>
don't seem to work
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6520#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6660
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6660#6660: interface.js fisheye onClick problemFri, 11 Jun 2010 19:23:19 GMTsuehernandez<p>
Using the FishEye function. When I click on an image, it runs a function that shows and hides some divs. That works.
</p>
<p>
However when I click on the image for the first time, after that when I mouseover the image it doesn't expand; however if I mouseover an area about 100 pixels below the images and it expands the images then.
</p>
<p>
Is this a known bug? Am I just not setting up my div right?
</p>
<p>
Thank you
Sue Hernandez
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6660#changeloghttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6752
http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6752#6752: this.source is not defined in jquery.ui.autocomplete.jsThu, 01 Jul 2010 14:52:51 GMTZlatanO<p>
it would be a good practice to predefine the "source" property of the autocomplete (jquery.ui.autocomplete.js ver. 1.8.1) plugin.
</p>
<p>
I solved this in this way:
file: jquery.ui.autocomplete.js
line (can be some other): 163
</p>
<p>
<em> code start
source: null,
</em> code end
</p>
<p>
when you add this, you won't have the error "this.source is undefined on line 201 in jquery..."
</p>
<p>
first invoker in my case was the _search function of the autocomplete so I've added this to have the function predefined
</p>
<p>
"source" is also defined in _initSource and it seems that sometimes other functions can't catch up with _initSource and there's a failure
</p>
Resultshttp://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/6752#changelog