It'sTime For The National Guard To Bust Some Skulls

The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to trash a Whole Foods store.

The First Amendment does not guarantee the right to "occupy" a public place.

-----------------------------------

I'm going to say something that some may find controversial. I'm going to say something that should have been said weeks ago. I'm going to say what needs to be said about the "Occupy Wall Street" barbarians, consequences be damned, criticism be damned.

See folks, the truth of the matter is this: the "Occupy" movement is NOT a political protest in any way, shape, or form. It's a civil disturbance. It may be the slowest populist riot in world history, but it's a riot nonetheless. The "Occupy Wall Street" protests must be shut down. Obviously, peacefully shutting down the protests is preferable, but if that's not possible, force should be used. (Whether liberals like Chairman Obama and Ron Paul like it or not.)

I know there will be some who will say I'm playing partisan games. After all, I'm a Constitutional Conservative Patriot and the bottom feeders in the "Occupy" movement are leftist piles of human debris. That's not the case at all. I'm not saying the "Occupy" movement should be stopped because of their beliefs. (Most of them are too stoned to know why they're there in the first place.) Communists, anarchists, and Nazis have held rallies in the US for decades and have never gained any traction since the US is a center-right Conservative country. I have no fear of these morons spreading propaganda or influencing the 2012 election. America has been down this road many times. There was the Socialist and anarchist movements in the late 1800's and early 1900's. There was the Communist Movement in the 1930's. There were the Nazi Bundists in the 1940's. The Weather Underground, led by Chairman Obama's ghost writer Bill Ayers, created all kinds of Marxist-Leninist havoc in the 1960's and early 1970's. None of these movements gained steam back then, just like the "Occupy" twits won't gain any now. Their beliefs don't bother me.

Their actions do.

From the "official" Occupy Wall Street website:

-----------------------------------

"Sign up for the eviction defense text blast!

Send a text to the number 23559, with the the message @occupyalert

This will be used for emergency alerts and announcements.
Three weeks ago NYPD delivered what was effectively a notice of eviction, telling residents of Liberty Square that Brookfield, with the help of the city, was going to clean the park. Instead, #OWS mobilized, organizing a mass clean up, mobilizing thousands of supporters, and flooding the mayors office with phone calls. An amazing pre-dawn defense packed the square with thousands of people. Brookfield stood down and the eviction was averted.

Today rumors are rampant that the city is again considering action to end the occupation. Labor leaders, local elected officials, and news outlets are hearing the rumblings of eviction. We know that when the next eviction attempt comes, we will not get advanced warning. NYPD could move in as early as tonight, or it could be next week. We know that our adversaries are trying to build political cover for eviction by demonizing us in the press.

We need to be ready to defend the occupation. Be prepared!"

http://occupywallst.org/forum/eviction-defense/

--------------------------------

Do the "Occupy" rodents own Zuccotti Park ? No. Are these animals paying rent to the Brookfield company for the use of its land ? No. Is the "Occupy" bowel movement paying its "fair share" of taxes to the New York Collective ? (There are reports that it has received over $500,000 in donations.) No. Is the "Occupy" mob paying taxes to the Federal Leviathan ? No. What gives them the right to police their own, like they supposedly did after the sexual assaults and thefts in Cleveland and Wall Street ? Nothing. What gives them the right to deal dope and do it right on the street ? No law I'm aware of. What gives these waste-oids the right to riot the way they did in Oakland ? Nada. What gives the "Occupy" movement the right to create its own society within society ?

The "Occupy" movement doesn't have the right to do any of these things, just like I don't have the right to do any of them. They're crimes. The First Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to do any of these things, either. Either we're a society of law and order or we're not. Individuals can't just grant themselves rights and then act accordingly. Our rights are granted by our Creator (regardless of what the criminals at the ACLU think) not by man. The moment we start thinking otherwise, our society will decay even more than it already has.

The solution to this is very simple. The governors of the states with "Occupy" movements should make a statement that states the wastes of skin have 24 hours to pack up and go home. If this reasonable demand is not met, the governors should use the National Guard to remove them, using force if necessary. The imaginary rights the "Occupy" gang have given themselves don't matter. What matters are the actual rights of the citizens who live the cities where the "Occupy" protests sprang up. The actual rights are the ones being violated by the Occupy fascists and the governments of these states must respond.

-------------------------

"If some 'pacifist' society renounced the use of retaliatory use of force, it would be left helplessly at the mercy of the first thug who decided to be immoral. Such a society would achieve the opposite of its intention: instead of abolishing evil, it would encourage and reward it."