Tag Archives: sex

An effort to cut down on the number of homeless pets in one Texas city has prompted officials to slap pet owners with a $75 sin tax to help deter their furry friends from breeding. Failure to register your pet’s new litter within 14 days “could result in fines and penalties,” states El Paso’s new animal ordinance.

City officials have also limited dogs and cats to 2 planned or unplanned pregnancies a year in an effort to prevent shelters from being overwhelmed. Professional breeders complain that the city’s crackdown on careless pet owners unfairly punishes their responsible businesses that provide in-demand pets to welcoming new homes.

El Paso Animal Services received $250,000 from the city council to step-up its enforcement efforts that will include monitoring newspapers and other media to ensure citizens selling puppies and kittens have registered their new litters and paid the sin tax for their pets’ intentional or unintentional ‘romantic encounters.’

Satan receives preferential treatment in OKC while lingerie football gets the boot.

Oklahoma City’s mayor has no problem with self-avowed Satanists conducting a “blasphemy ritual” at the Civic Center, but when it comes to scantily clad women charging the football field, that’s where he draws the line.

Watch Reason.TV explain why it crowned Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett its November “Nanny of the Month.”

"It’s a new level of privacy, and it feels good to give something back to the community,” business owner Sherri Williams said of her newest adult store location that offers drive-thru convenience.

Having failed to overturn Alabama’s ban on sex toys after a hot date with the Supreme Court in 2007, the owner of an adult novelty store in Huntsville has found a way to bring pleasure to the people by taking advantage of a loophole in the state’s anti-obscenity law.

Those adults who can not complete the state-mandated medical questionnaire that Williams requires upon checkout are left to their own devices because big government bureaucrats fear they’d use the devices for “immoral purposes.”

Are you buzzed-off or tickled pink by the so-called anti-obscenity law that leaves Alabama as the last state in the nation to prohibit citizens from purchasing adult novelties?

A public high school in Maine has banned ‘dirty dancing’ aka ‘grinding’ to the dismay of hormonally challenged students who are threatening to boycott this weekend’s homecoming dance.

Portland High School senior Felix Cobanovic told the Portland Press Herald that grinding is the “dance style of his generation” while classmate Grace Hanley, a junior, remarked, “Adults see it as a sexual thing, but it’s more of a social thing.”

Some students argue that despite adults’ beliefs that grinding has everything to do with simulating sex and nothing to do with dancing, junior Keelia Ryan admits things can get out of hand, but it’s nothing teenage girls can’t handle on their own, much less anything for their parents to worry about.

“The problem for some girls is when some random guy comes up behind them and starts grinding on them,” Ryan said. “But if you don’t want to dance with a boy, you just move away from him. You have to be assertive.”

Ahmed Ahmed, a senior, agrees with Ryan’s insistence that students should be allowed to handle situations that arise on the dance floor on their own, without adults interfering.

“It’s treating us like we’re children, and some of us are already 18,” Ahmed said. “Girls don’t have to dance with someone they don’t like. They can just say no. I was turned down five times at one dance. I just moved on and danced with a lot of other girls.”

Despite the pleas and threats from students, Principal Mike Johnson said he’s not going to budge on his anti-grinding policy that prohibits boys and girls from grinding their pelvises and crotches to the hottest beats, even if it’s the only way they know how to ‘dance.’

“I have 1,000 parents who love me and 1,000 students who are mad at me,” Johnson said. “They’re upset because they think I’m trying to ruin their dance, but I’m just trying to keep them safe and teach them how to act with responsibility and civility in a public place.”

Whose side are you on? The mean old principal who just doesn’t understand this generation’s groove or the misunderstood teenagers with raging hormones in need of dance lessons?

Believe it or not, Dr. Debby is the faculty member running the sex toy study at IUB.

Researchers at Indiana University’s Bloomington (IUB) campus are soliciting participants for a ‘medical’ study with an unorthodox incentive — coupons for sex toys. “The purpose of this study is to explore the sexual behaviors of women across the globe and the extent to which they purchase, own, and use (or do not purchase, do not own, or do not use) sexual toys,” the Women’s Global Sex Study webpage states.

Upon successful completion of a comprehensive survey exploring female participants’ sexual practices and fetishes, they will be rewarded with a coupon for 20%-off merchandise at Chicago’s Early to Bed “sex-positive, women-oriented” adult novelty store. (NSFW)

“By participating in this study, you will be helping to provide information will be used to develop a better understanding of attitudes and behaviors related to sexuality and sexual products,” IUB researchers inform potential participants. “This information will be particularly useful to sexuality educators and other professionals who design products and other materials that help women to live healthy and satisfactory sexual lives.”

Indiana University President Michael A. McRobbie told Governor Mitch Daniels (R) in the most recently available financial report [2008-2009] that continued state funding is critical to ensuring the “best return” on investments made towards ongoing research projects and other educational pursuits:

Indiana University continues to regard the funding it receives as a public trust. We are deeply grateful for the support we receive from state appropriations, donor contributions, grants or contracts, and student fees, and are committed to achieving the best return on all of those investments. We also remain dedicated to fulfilling all of IU’s core missions of education and research and to our engagement in the successful future of the state.

Ask Gov. Daniels and IU President McRobbie how they envision researching the sexual habits and fetishes of women at taxpayers’ expense will contribute to ensuring the “successful future of the state.” Right now, Indiana is facing a deficit that could top $1 billion in the next budget year!

Just another "educational" experience courtesy of a "non-profit" organization catering to cougars and their younger prey.

An “educational non-profit organization” that caters to the ‘cougar’ lifestyle claims it had to cancel an upcoming singles getaway because a major U.S. cruise line allegedly discriminates against older women who prey on younger men. Keep reading, because it gets even more bizarre.

The Society of Single Professionals complains that, despite the “tremendous success of the world’s first International Cougar Cruise” aboard Carnival Cruise Lines in December 2009, the ‘Fun Ship’ will not allow itself to become the ‘Love Boat’ again in 2010 or beyond. Rich Gosse, chairman of the organization, elaborates:

While it is perfectly acceptable for middle-aged men to date women their daughter’s age, women don’t have the same privilege. After the tremendous success of the world’s first International Cougar Cruise, December 2009, aboard Carnival, we were shocked that they refused to allow another. If there had been problems on the first Cougar Cruise we would understand being banned. But hundreds of our cougars and cubs onboard were well-behaved, and there were absolutely no problems. We expect the same will be true with the European Cougar Cruise.

Cougars awaiting their prey.

Stepping-up to the plate and welcoming hundreds of sex-crazed cougars and their so-called ‘cubs’ aboard is Royal Caribbean International. The “Liberty of the Seas” ship will depart from Barcelona, Spain, and help the intergenerational couples make love connections or whatever ‘floats their boats’ across Europe from April 16-21 in 2011.

An “educational non-profit organization?” How the heck did they pull that off with the IRS and State of California?

It sure is amazing how a glorified sex tour operator that also proclaims itself to be “an alternative to the bar scene” is proudly advertising its “nonprofit” tax status. The NSLF searched Guidestar.org’s “broad and deep” database of non-profit organizations to verify the organization’s “non-profit” status and could not locate any results to support the claim:

Society of Single Professionals is a division of American Singles Education, Inc., incorporated in the State of California in 1978 as an educational non-profit organization. We are the world’s largest non-profit singles organization, sponsoring thousands of educational and social events for singles worldwide, on six continents.

If you’re wondering what passes for an “educational” experience worthy of tax-exempt status, perhaps the itinerary for the April 2011 cruise will give you a good idea (or not):

Our days at sea will have an array of activities offered by the cruise ship and by our social host along to bring the group together. So you’ll have non-stop activities or you can just sit back and socialize with a cool drink, relax in one of the many pools or jacuzzis or enjoy a tantalizing host of other on board services. Workout in the fitness center and pamper yourself in the spa!Watch the sun set over the sea as you stroll the decks of our floating resort and then enjoy incredible gourmet meals, lavish nightlyshows and the chance to dance the night away with great new friends.

According to the State of California’s requirements for organizations seeking to incorporate as “domestic non-profit corporations,” the petitioner must prove it provides a “public benefit,” “mutual benefit” or “religious” purpose. “Unless otherwise required by law, any deviation from the required purpose statement can be cause for rejection,” the Calif. Secretary of State’s “Corporate Filing Tips” webpage states.

We’re not tax attorneys, but we do know that this cougar-centric organization serves no religious purpose. Here’s how the Secretary of State defines “public benefit” and “mutual benefit” requirements:

Public Benefit – This corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for (public or charitable [insert one or both]) purposes.

Mutual Benefit – This corporation is a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation organized under the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law. The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity, other than credit union business, for which a corporation may be organized under such law.

Something sounds fishy about American Singles Education, Inc.’s so-called “non-profit” status qualifications. Despite widespread media coverage of this organization and its sexually-charged activities, not a single journalist has ever raised the issue of how this organization can claim itself to be an “educational non-profit organization” meriting tax exempt status.

Inmates in one San Francisco prison don’t need to worry about being forcefully raped anymore, or so say city bureaucrats who think that installing free condom machines will help make for a safer environment behind bars.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the Sheriff’s Department installed 16 condom machines in the San Bruno prison facility, despite the fact that having sex in jail is illegal under California Penal Code § 286(e). Thanks to Sheriff Michael Hennessey, the jail’s 750 prisoners can start having protected illegal sex with or without each other’s permission.

Kate Monico Klein, director of the Public Health Department’s ‘condoms for inmates’ program, told the Chronicle that consensual sex and forced rape already happen, so the city’s just trying to make for safer experiences. “If (providing condoms) saves one or two lives, it’s worth it,” she said.

And, guess who will be footing the bill for criminals to engage in homosexual activities behind bars? You got it — the city’s taxpayers! Talk about taking it up the wazoo against your will.

That’s not all, folks! The condom machine program in San Bruno prison is the brainchild of the National Institutes of Medical Health (NIMH), “part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.”

In 2008, the NIMH funded the “The Novel Condom Access project” to investigate how the San Francisco County Jail could best protect inmates against the threat of sexually transmitted diseases while incarcerated. Two years later, those recommendations have been taken to the bank by Sheriff Hennessey and 16 condom machines now line the halls of San Bruno prison.

Contact Sheriff Hennessey if you think he’s abusing his job and the California state law expressly prohibiting sexual relations between inmates by encouraging just that with free condoms.