Report 2
Technical Prototype Report

Due: Saturday, March 26th at 11:59 pm

This two week-report covers what you did to get ready for technical prototype.
This report will have exactly the same format of the previous one. You will have another
CATME survey asking how you worked as a group. In
addition, you should fill out a short report documenting what tasks were completed
and what tasks a proposed for the next milestone.

Again, refer to the example below if you are unsure of how to
structure the report.If you received any negative comments about your
previous report, you should address those this time. We do not
want reports to be revised; we always want to be moving forward. However, we will take
off for mistakes that are made twice in a row.

Progress Report

Your report is divided into two halfs: the progress report and predictions for the next
milestone. In the first part, you should begin with a short description of what the
entire group did for these past two weeks. Obviously you worked on the technical prototype,
architecture specification, and design specification. However, did you do anything else
like animation and music? Have you do any playtesting yet?

This description should be no more than a paragraph or two. After this summary, you should
begin a more detailed breakdown for each individual on the team.

Activity Breakdown

For each team member you need to create a subsection. At the start of the subsection you
should give short description of the primary responsbilities of that team member over the
course of this prototype. This needs be no longer than a paragraph.

After this paragraph, provide a table where each row consists of the following:

An individual task that the team member worked on or was supposed to work on

Whether or not this task was completed, and the data completed if appropriate.

The estimate of hours from the previous two week report

The actual of the number of hours spent on that task

Note that this is different from the previous two week report. Now you are comparing
your predictions from the previous report to what actually happened. This is exactly
what the example report does, so you should look at it if you
have any questions.

After the table, you should provide the total number of hours that this person worked
over this reporting period. Please be honest here. We never count off for not working
"enough" hours. However, hours give us an idea of who is being productive and
who is not. This allows us to make suggestions for improvement in later
milestones.

Milestone Predictions

Once you have finished the report for this prototype, you should layout your plans for
the next stage, alpha release. The alpha release is expected to be much more comprehensive
than the last first demonstrations. All of your controls should be finalized. You should
also have a (simple) level editor and a playable "level". The level editor does not
have to be part of your game. It can be a separate program that creates files that
are read by your game.
assignment instructions
for more details.

As with the progress report, start with a short, overall summary of what you propose to do.
There are no new documents this milestone, but you will be asked to revise previous
documents. You should also describe what kind of level you will demonstrate in this
release. In short, this paragraph should constitute the deliverables
for the next assignment.

Activity Breakdown

For each team member, you should describe his or her responsibilities (in detail), as well
as how much time the should be spent on each responsibility. Remember that the time that
you assign to each team member should add up to about 10 hours a week (e.g. 20 hours over
the two weeks). However, there are a lot of things that you are going to be doing over
this period time. You should be very liberal in how you count the time spent by each
team member; include all of the following:

Time spent discussing in group meetings

Time spent on the document revisions.

Time spent on the alpha release.

Time spent on art or music assets.

In essence, we are asking that you take what you predicted in your
milestones and give us a lot more detail for the next
two-weeks. In the milestones, we just wanted a prediction of what the entire group
will accomplish. In the two-week report, we want a individual assignments and a
prediction of the hours that each person will spend on each.

In estimating time spent, we again ask that you organize this information into a table.
In each row of the table, you should have the following:

An individual task that the team member is assigned

The internal (team) deadline for completing this task

An estimate of the number of hours that will be spent on the task

A priority value for the task; lower priority tasks are optional

In assigning these tasks, you should use what you learned about your group dynamics during
the gameplay prototype. While tasks may be uneven at the start of the semester, we hope
that they will even out by the end.

Charter Revisions

This last part is completely optional. If, after this two-week sprint, you have made any
revisions to your charter, you should let us know. We do not want the charter revision
as part of the two-week report, but you are welcome to submit it along with the two-week
report. The revised charter should have the same format
as your original submission

The example linked above is an (edited) version of a two-week report submitted by
the game Dispossessed in Spring 2015. We have removed the parts of the report
that are no longer relevant for this year. What remains is exactly what we are looking
for in a two-week report.

This report is taken from later in the semester, as the team had really gotten into a
grove at this point and was submitting excellent reports. As a result, the progress
report compares the number of hours worked to the hours predicted. You did not make
any predictions before this report, and so this is not relevant. But we want everything
else.

Submission

Due: Saturday, March 26th at 11:59 pm

You should submit a PDF file called report.
Again, we ask that the file be a PDF so that we cannot annotate it in order to
return it to you with feedback for possible revision. It is fine if you create
the document in a program like Microsoft Word, but you should convert it to PDF
before submission.

If you are revising your charter, this is also a space for it in CMS called
charter. However, this is completely
optional; you should not submit anything here if you are not revising your charter.