Advertisements

Experiment 23 – Failure Analysis

It turns out that there may have been a good reason that Experiment 23 did not produce any excess heat. The pressure gauge melted. The experiment needs to be repeated since this can be viewed as an equipment failure and the results must be considered invalid.

I have taken a little break from experimenting since other areas of life require more attention currently. I’m hoping to resume this fall. In the meantime, hopefully some of the other replicators can find encouraging results to bolster my own.

Jones: It seems that increasing inner volume within and attached to a reactor burn chamber i.e. the area would increase the inner reactor core chambers potential volume. LENR would appear to work as the replaced art (burning fossil fuel)within an enclosed area or furthered an engine.

Critical to performance is a compression ratio and the ability to go from low compression to high compression in a milli second. The differential of changing elements extracts energy or potential power. So the rebounding frequency of the compressed environment is assumed to perform more efficiently when the time element of differential pressures decreases.

Adding inner reactor burn chamber volume decreases the potential energy that can be exchanged. A small reactor chamber will react quicker by not allowing the rebound or differential pressures to have a large area to oscillate within.

Thanks Dale. I will try to find those gauges. It was in a horizontal position. It was encouraging that something was found to be wrong. It should not have shown excess heating with a failure like that, and it did not. Now, I just need to repeat the experiment (hopefully without an equipment failure).