Archive for July, 2015

This token gesture of ‘justice’ is only happening because in this most recent Orthodox Judaic attack on a Catholic church, there was substantial international reporting which called attention to the religious motive of the Judaic terrorists. Independent Catholic news orgs in the U.S. finally did some adequate reporting on this latest church attack and drew attention to the Orthodox Judaic motive.

No one reading the report below should be lead to believe that ‘Israel’ has any concern for Christian or Palestinian rights or welfare. It only means that ‘Israel’ is extremely sensitive to its image abroad. If that is the only means of assuring that non-Judaic people can have even a semblance of security in this region, then we must keep up the honest reporting.

The Church of the Multiplication on the Sea of Galilee was burned by Orthodox ‘Jews’ who also spray painted the church with hate graffiti from the Aleinu prayer which every Orthodox ‘Jew’ prays three times every day, June 18, 2015. The Judaic attackers likely chose the 18th because 18 has strong cabalistic significance, meaning ‘life’ (Chai: Judaic life, that is). In Orthodox Judaism, Judaic ‘life’ is strengthened when non-Judaic life is weakened

Men indicted in historic church attack previously hit churches, Palestinians

July 29, 2015

JERUSALEM (JTA) — The two men indicted in the alleged arson attack on a historic church in northern Israel has previously been involved in attacks on churches and Palestinians.

The two suspects, ages 19 and 20, were indicted Wednesday on Nazareth Magistrate’s Court in connection with the June 18 attack on the Church of the Multiplication of the Loaves and Fishes.

“Administrative steps” will be taken against three other suspects who were not indicted, Israel’s Shin Bet security agency said in a statement issued Wednesday.

The group, which has “an extremist ideology,” has operated since 2013, according to the Shin Bet, and “aspires to change the regime and bring about the redemption via various stages of action.”

Some of the activists have been involved with the settler hilltop youth in the West Bank as well.

The group began with anti-Christian activity, including vandalizing and arsoning Christian sites, and also tried unsuccessfully to disrupt the May 2014 visit to Israel and the West Bank of Pope Benedict XVI. In the last year it also perpetrated arson attacks on Palestinian homes, according to the Shin Bet.

“The Israel Security Agency and the Israel Police view with utmost gravity any intent or action to attack religious sites in the State of Israel and will work together in order to foil the activity,” the statement said.

Police initially detained 16 youths in the attack on the historic Church of the Multiplication of the Loaves and Fishes, who were hiking in the area on the evening before the attack.

Along with the fire that struck the church, located on the northwest shore of the Sea of Galilee, graffiti reading “False idols will be smashed” and “pagans” were found on its walls. The site is where Jesus is believed to have fed thousands of people with five loaves of bread and two fish.

Built on the site of a fifth-century church, the church contains restored mosaic floors from the time period. The fire reportedly damaged the church’s roof and structure and burned hundreds of books, according to Haaretz.

To the Judaic mindset, Jonathan Pollard, a man clearly guilty of high treason to the nation of which he was nominally a citizen, is a “captive.” Note well, according to the rabbis, a ‘Jew’ guilty of treason to a non-Judaic nation is not guilty of anything. Quite the contrary; that Goy nation is guilty of holding the treasonous Judaic spy, Pollard, “captive.” Naturally for the rabbis, a “captive” ‘Jew’ must be “redeemed.” To do so is a “great Mitzvah.” Everything that we’ve witnessed from Judaic society regarding Jonathan Pollard and the extraordinary efforts to “redeem” him from “captivity” testifies to this.

Note that while maintaining and acting on these tribe-first-and-last beliefs, they tell us Pollard should be released because ‘he was working for our ally Israel.’ But this is only double-speak for Goy consumption. The truth is, a non-Judaic ally in Judaism is not even conceivable. There are only situational, pragmatic relationships of expedience with loathsome Goys that can turn on a dime if and when tribal concerns require it.

The Pollard Affair – To Free A Captive Is To Free G-d

Rabbi Efraim Sprecher – July 1, 2009

“The sword is worse than death, famine is worse than the sword, captivity is worst of all”(Babylonian Talmud, Bava Batra 8a)

Throughout history, Jews have gone to remarkable lengths to retrieve their brethren from hostile hands. This mitzvah is referred to in rabbinic literature as “pidyon shvuyim” (redemption of captives). It is the only precept designated by the Talmud as a “mitzvah rabba” (great mitzvah). Its special status in Jewish law goes to the heart of defining the moral and material dimensions of the value of human life.

Oddly, however, given its unique standing in Jewish law, no specific directive to redeem captives is found anywhere in the Bible. Maimonides and other authorities do list a series of Biblical precepts that are violated, if one is remiss in fulfilling this duty. One – the obligation not to “rule over him (your fellow man) ruthlessly” (Leviticus 25:43) – is found in the Torah portion Behar. Yet this verse actually refers to the proper treatment of Jewish slaves owned by other Jews, not to the rescue of Jews from non-Jewish hands.

In fact, none of the verses cited by Maimonides in his major Halachic work “Yad Hazakah”, refers directly to the rescue of captives. This duty, he explains, falls under the general rule of mandated assistance to the hungry, the naked and the imperiled.

The absence of a distinct legal imperative to rescue captives is offset by the high profile afforded this subject in the Biblical narrative. Abraham, the first redeemer of captives, risked everything by going to war against the great regional powers in order to rescue his captured kinsman Lot (Genesis 14). In Numbers 21, the nation of Israel initiated a war to retrieve (according to rabbinic tradition) a single captive of non-Jewish origin, whom the Canaanites had taken in battle. And King David responded similarly when Jewish captives were taken by the Amalekites (I Samuel 30). In all these cases, the mode of response was uncompromising, even in the absence of an explicit Divine command.

How are we to understand this absence of an explicit order to fulfill the ‘great mitzvah”? The answer may lie in Rabbi Bachya ben Asher’s “Kad Hachmah,” which refers us to the Ten Commandments. In the First Commandment, which many Halachic authorities understood as the precept to believe in G-d, the Almighty presents Himself as the Great Redeemer, “I am the Lord your G-d, Who has taken you out of Egypt.” Rabbi Bachya, like other commentators, is perplexed by the verse’s reference to the Exodus. If any feat were to be highlighted in this identifying statement, surely the creation of universe is the most obvious choice. Why settle for a more “local” and less extraordinary miracle? Rabbi Bachya concludes that the verse describes G-d as the Redeemer of captives, as an exhortation to become like Him.

Thus it would appear that the rescue of captives is so cardinal a principle that it merits implicit mention in the fundamental Jewish tenet: to believe in G-d. How can we explain this? Jewish sources state that there is more than one type of captive. The Talmud (Berakhot 8a) describes G-d Himself as a “captive,” Who can be “redeemed only through our observance of mitzvot and study of Torah.

Kabbalah teaches that the redemption of captive is a symbol of the entire 613 commandments. While G-d in Himself is infinite, His hidden presence in the world – the Shechinah – is perceived as being in exile and can be redeemed from its “imprisonment” through our good deeds. Thus, the fulfillment of all commandments is an act of redeeming captives that releases the spiritual potential latent in all corporeal (physical) reality.

Finally, the very term “redemption of captives” suggests that even the liberation of flesh-and-blood prisoners involves something larger than the restoration of their freedom. In rabbinic sources, this term is always give in the plural, suggesting that there is no such thing as a single captive, for the Jewish nation is understood as an organic “spiritual whole” – that acts as a vehicle for the revelation of G-d. This wholeness is viewed as a prerequisite for the revelation at Mount Sinai, the Messianic era, and the ultimate fulfillment of Jewish destiny.

Thus, as long as Jonathan Pollard is in captivity, all of us are in captivity as well.

Bio Note: The author, Rabbi Efraim Sprecher, is the Dean of Students of The Diaspora Yeshiva, Jerusalem.

According to rabbinic law a wife is to be used like “Meat from the butcher or fish from the fishmonger” that’s the status of the woman in Orthodox Judaism (Babylonian Talmud, tractate Nedarim 20b).

Also, rabbinic law permits a Judaic soldier to rape non-Judaic women during wartime, documented HERE. I hope that readers will keep that thought in mind as they consider the mass-rapings of German women by the Judeobolshevik Red Army during and following WWII.

Timothy Dolan recently joined in a celebration of Abraham Foxman’s manifold accomplishments as an enforcer for the Judaic mafia. After 28 years of relentless bullying, smear-campaigning, career-wrecking, culture and religion-destroying, etc. Foxman is retiring from the misnamed ADL; an organization that exists to assure that Judaic defamation of others is entirely unchallenged.

Abraham Foxman has spent his life, primarily, demonizing and contriving to alter and rewrite the Catholic religion which in its ‘anti-semitic,’ pre-Vatican II state inspired his Catholic nanny to preserve his life during World War II at great risk to herself. Foxman’s return on this Christian act of sacrifice, with usury, could tempt one nearly to believe it was a mistake, but that says more about him than anything else.

It’s well beyond the scope of this posting to accurately assess the cultural catastrophe strewn in Foxman’s wake, but one of his representative works demands mention. This was Foxman’s sit-down with Ukrainian government officials during which he threatened them to cease their efforts to have the Ukrainian genocide recognized, documented HERE. The motivation was obvious. The Ukrainian genocide (referred to as the ‘Holodomor’) was intentionally engineered by ‘Uncle Joe’ Stalin and his willing Judaic executioners. Having succeeded in bullying the Ukraine to shut up about the largely Judeo-perpetrated genocide of tens of millions of its Christian people, Foxman cleared the way for a ‘Catholic’ con-man who goes by the name ‘Father’ Patrick Desbois, together with the AJC, to install monuments throughout the Ukraine memorializing an alleged ‘Holocaust’ of ‘Jews’ there, see HERE and HERE.

Timothy Dolan’s involvement in such iniquitous business with such characters is so constant as to have become blasé. We’ve covered it HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, and elsewhere.

What we’ve recently felt compelled to comment on is Dolan’s propensity to hide his cross from view of his fellow mobsters of the Judaic self-faith HERE and HERE.

Truly, I find it appropriate for Timothy Dolan (whose acts of selfish ambition conclusively reveal him to be a simple, non-Christian political whore) to wear a bare chain of gold around his neck. And I say unreservedly, barring a miraculous conversion to Christ, and lifetime of penance in seclusion, it would be better for Timothy Dolan, and for all of us, if he were to hang himself like Judas from that gold chain than to continue in his collusion with the Pharisees, scandalizing and sending souls to hell through his satanic misdirection and example.

God, please, in a testament to your greatness, gloriously convert this anti-Christ scoundrel or remove him and all those like him from our midst.

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks: Judaism and the Mafia; ‘giving’ to ‘the family’ what was extracted from outsiders.

Jonathan Sacks is the former Chief Rabbi of Great Britain. He has since gained peerage and a seat in the House of Lords. He’s currently promoting a book for gullible Goy consumption which seizes upon Western intelligence’s Islamic terror as an opportunity to coagulate the Goyim together into ‘tolerant’ ‘Noahide’ nothingness while encouraging ‘Jews’ to maintain their traditional tribal distinctness. I’ll pass on commenting on that work for now to focus on another constant theme of Sacks.

Rabbi Sacks himself said that the Chabad Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Schneerson, “told me exactly what he wanted me to do … he gave me a whole set of instructions which have directed my life from that day to this. Almost everything I’ve done, I’ve done because he asked me to.” But, “the one thing he never asked me to do was to become a Lubavitcher Hasid” HERE. This apparent contradiction is perfectly understandable in light of the Chabad Lubavitcher Rebbe’s instructions to certain human assets, to ‘be modern on the outside but Chabad on the inside’ HERE.

In the video below, we can see the chameleon, Rabbi Jonathan Sacks shift back and forth between his smooth, Oxford persona and his inner Chabad Yid. The setting is a talk on ‘Tzedakah and Social Justice’ at an IFLA (Israel Free Loan Association) event. The ‘Israel’ Free Loan Association gives 0% interest loans to ‘Jews’ only (interest on loans is only to be charged to non-Jews according to rabbinic law). Beginning at approximately 18:50 in the video Rabbi Sacks starts speaking of Judaism’s ‘social justice’ (Tzadakah, i.e. compulsory giving of charity to fellow ‘Jews’ of wealth gained from the non-Judaic community). He interestingly points out that he knows of no similar concept in other cultures, aside from the mafia.

Rabbi Sacks:

There is a unique law in Judaism; kofin al tzadakah [charitable giving to fellow ‘Jews’ is to be coerced]. Can you imagine another country in which, if you don’t give charity, they force you to? The mafia say, you know, ‘either you give or you sleep with the fishes,’ you know. It doesn’t exist in any other culture. They don’t understand it when I say to them, ‘If you don’t give tzadakah, you could be forced to by a Beit Din [rabbinic court].’ [Did] you ever go to a Jewish fund raising event and get out without giving? That’s kofin al tzadakah. And it’s beautiful.

This is not just Rabbi Sacks’ opinion. It is the law of Orthodox Judaism as codified by the codifier of Orthodox Judaism, Moses Maimonides:

He who does not want to give charity, or gives less than is proper, will be forced to do so by the rabbinical court, even to the point of striking him, until he gives his due, and the court will examine and assess his property in his presence, and take what is proper for him to give. And they may take collateral for charity, even on the eve of the Sabbath. (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilkhot matanot aniyim [Laws of Giving to the Poor] 7:10).

Rabbi Sacks’ full address to the ‘Israel’ Free Loan Association is below. The relevant content starts at around 18 minutes:

“For a Jew like [Nathan] Rothschild, as the Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks explained to me, what for a Christian is charity, was rather stricter. Philanthropy is duty. You have to do it. It’s ten per cent [of your earnings] and we’re not saying it would be a nice idea; we’re saying you do that – and if you don’t, we ostracise you.”

Contemplate that for a moment, reader. The rabbis could ostracize Nathan Rothschild? That’s exactly what he’s saying.

Susannah Heschel is the daughter of that old hater of Christ and His followers, Rabbi Abraham Heschel who once candidly admitted in a Yiddish interview that he compared Christians to Nazis in the New York Times in order to “attack their souls.” In the same interview, he also suggested that ‘dialogue’ with Christians is a more preferable means of attack than open warfare HERE.

Rabbi Heschel never had a son, only one daughter, Susannah Heschel, so his wealth of traditional rabbinic hatred of non-Jews, European Christians, in particular, was imparted abundantly to her. That received hatred is in full display in the video below.

In about 45 seconds, this sorcerer’s apprentice is able to transfer blame for the crucifixion of Christ from the pharisee/rabbis of His time who plotted His crucifixion to the Romans; to indict today’s “white churches” in toto for slavery, Jim Crow laws, and what she calls “The New Jim Crow” (whatever irrational, anti-white contrivance that is); to heap shame upon “white churches” and incite all who will listen to not let up on white church-shaming, or to forgive, until reparations are paid unto full restitution because, “in Judaism there is no repentance without restitution.”

It’s clear that the narrative of Christian forgiveness which emerged from the Emanuel AME church was infuriating to Heschel when the occasion required (in her mind) ‘attacking their souls,’ which she did with all of her might, just like her father, during an MSNBC interview HERE.

“The focus has been on forgiveness and the evocation has been of Christ of the cross forgiving. But what about the Romans, the crucifiers? What about their repentance? In Judaism there is no repentance without restitution.

“I would like to know if the white churches in this country are hanging their heads in shame today. But you know the shame isn’t enough because they can’t repent without restitution. When are we going to have reparation for slavery, for Jim Crow, for the new Jim Crow?

“Unless you give back, there is no forgiveness for you. The repentance cannot even begin without the restitution.” (Susannah ‘attack their souls’ Heschel)

Observe the “who am I to judge” Pope’s relations with his “no one judges Israel” ‘brothers in the faith’ and it is clear that this wildly disproportionate arrangement underpinning ‘dialogue’ was always a setup for complete defraudation. There are few tasks left for Pope Francis to accomplish in the Novus Ordo overthrow of Catholicism under the rubric of ‘conciliatory gestures’ which do nothing but embolden the leaders of Deicide Judaism, megalomaniacs that they are, to assert their satanic authority and arrogantly dismiss all others. In the absence of a true judge in the person Christ’s vicar, the Pope, another will judge in his place.

Fundamentally corrupt ‘Judeo-Christian dialogue’ has accomplished nothing other than enabling and abetting evil. This ‘Sanhedrin’ claims lineage to the kangaroo court which condemned the perfectly just, incarnate God to death. And now it seeks to judge Christ’s alleged vicar, a man whose record of treason to the office he holds and fealty to the rabbis he serves is besmirched only by a meaningless, token gesture of recognition of a ‘Palestinian state’ of a few scraps spared from the total land grab advocated by the Sanhedrin itself which claims “the sole God given right to the land of Israel is to the Nation of Israel.” God save us from this attempted, total inversion of the natural and spiritual order.

A re-established and self declared Israeli Sanhedrin, the religious High Court composed of 71 sages, has declared that it is putting Pope Francis on trial unless he retracts his statement that the Jews have no right to the land of Israel or to Jerusalem.

In February 2013, the Vatican officially recognized the “State of Palestine” but more significantly, the Vatican signed a treaty in June with “Palestine” in which the Holy See switched its diplomatic relations from the Palestinian Liberation Organization to the “State of Palestine”. This treaty is the first legal document negotiated between the Holy See and the Palestinian state and as such, constitutes an official recognition.

The trial and judgment will be on September 20th, 2015. If Pope Francis chooses to ignore the summons, he will be judged in absentia.

The Sanhedrin sent a letter to Pope Francis in reaction to the Vatican’s recent support of the Palestinian Authority’s unilateral moves to declare themselves a nation, reported the Hebrew magazine Matzav Haruach on June 24.

The letter stated:

“Because the Vatican recognized the organization known as the Palestinian Authority as a nation, and has begun to refer to it as a nation in its documents. His honor has named the head of said authority as an ‘Angel of Peace’, as was explained by a spokesman for the Vatican, that his intention was to encourage Abu Mazen to advance towards peace. These actions, to our great dismay, are consistent with a long series of actions and stances that are as in the days of the Roman Catholic Religion, that swore to persecute Israel because we refused to accept their Messiah as the Messiah of Israel, and to renounce our faith. The recent announcements and actions of the Vatican are a rebuke to the Jewish Nation and to the Bible, which you use to interpret the prophecies, as if God has abandoned his original Nation of Israel. Reality has proven the opposite to be true.”

“We require from you an apology for your recognizing as a nation those who stole the land, those who are known as the Palestinian Authority, and we are informing the Vatican that the sole God given right to the land of Israel is to the Nation of Israel. If His Honor the Pope, and the Vatican, do not apologize within two weeks of receiving this letter, and if he does not change his ways, we shall judge these actions in the Court of Mount Zion, in a court of 71 Jewish elders of Zion, and enact the prophecy of ‘The liberators will rise up upon Mount Zion, to judge the Mountain of Esau and the kingdom shall be God’s’ (Obadiah 1:21). The court shall judge the Vatican in its presence or in absentia, and it is possible that the Vatican will be found guilty of anti-Semitism, as has been known to be done several times throughout history, and to place responsibility upon the Vatican for all of the outcomes of its actions.”

The Sanhedrin has no political or legal status, and clearly has no authority over the Vatican. However, it is comprised of some of the greatest rabbis of the modern Jewish nation, men who have dedicated themselves to Torah, serving God and Israel. One of the main leaders behind the revival of the Sanhedrin is Rabbi Yoel Schwartz, well known for his advocacy in strengthening non-Jewish support for Israel.

The court’s rulings have the highest spiritual significance. The commandment to appoint judges is learned directly from the Bible (Exodus 18:13) and the present Sanhedrin is an effort to reestablish a tradition dating back to Moses.

Pope Francis’ recent visit to Israel and many of his actions caused disturbing waves in the difficult situation in the region.

His controversial description of Abbas as an “angel of peace” led to the Vatican backtracking and attempts to placate Israel. The Pope’s much-publicized meditation at a section of the security barrier prominently displaying pro-boycott graffiti was used by the Palestinians in an appeal to remove the much-needed security measure. That section of the wall also showed graffiti comparing the wall around Bethlehem to the Warsaw Ghetto. Pictures of the Pope’s visit to the wall went viral and became a symbol for anti-Israel sentiment.

While in Israel, Pope Francis attended Sunday mass at the Church of the Nativity. In his sermon, Latin Patriarch Fuoad Twal accused Israelis of being the present-day version of Christ killers by referring to the Palestinians as walking “in the footsteps of the Divine Child,” and likening the Israelis to King Herod. Shockingly, Pope Francis echoed his remarks in a later speech.

Pope Francis embraced the Palestinian mufti of Jerusalem, Sheikh Muhammed Hussein calling him “dear brother” in a show of great affection. In 2012, Hussein said it was the destiny of Muslims to kill Jews, who he claims are “subhuman beasts and the enemies of Allah.” Sheikh Hussein has also praised suicide bombers and said their souls “tell us to follow in their path,” remarks the Pope has never condemned.

Most significant, perhaps was a story of the Pope’s visit Caroline Glick told The Jerusalem Post. In a conversation with the Pope, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu mentioned that Jesus spoke Hebrew. Pope Francis corrected him, saying that Jesus spoke Aramaic. A flustered Netanyahu agreed that educated Jews at the time spoke Aramaic, but the language of the common people and the language Jesus preached in was Hebrew.

Reuters wrote of the exchange, noting that, “Modern-day discourse about Jesus is complicated and often political.” The report went on to explain, “Palestinians sometimes describe Jesus as a Palestinian. Israelis object to that.”

Pope Francis embraced Arab leaders, but more significantly, he accepted Palestinian national status, precluding any negotiated peace process, and voiding the validity of Israel’s claim to their God-given homeland.

Getting in touch with my feelings the other day, I realized how I loathe homosexuals. All of them? Of course not. Some of them are funny, kind, intelligent, and otherwise pleasant. But homosexuals in general, yes. I can’t stand them. Especially the ones who are organized under the rubric of gay rights.

I guess this makes me “homophobic.” So what? Homophobia is one of those ugly cant-words — like racist and sexist — that no self-respecting speaker of the English language would use. (Try to imagine Abraham Lincoln calling someone “homophobic.”) It’s a verbal badge of groupthink.

Funny how the people who style themselves victims always want to bully everyone else. Diversity now means conformity. It means making sensible people afraid to contradict nonsense so obvious as to insult their intelligence.

Normal people find homosexuality, especially male homosexuality, repellent. We’re supposed to apologize for that? Our slang words for the anus, and their use as insults, express our disgust with the whole idea of anal sex. Apart from the personal defilement it involves, it’s grossly unsanitary.

My own feelings are intensified by personal experience. Believe me, when a child you love has been sodomized, it takes a lot of the romance out of buggery. What was merely disgusting becomes nauseating. You needn’t hate the perpetrator — who, in this case as in so many others, had been sodomized as a child himself — to feel utter revulsion at the act, and contempt for those who try to endow it with dignity.

Will the victim now grow up to sodomize other boys? Will he come down with AIDS? Will he, on his wedding night, remember this first “sexual” experience?

Another instance of homosexual pedophilia has been in the news lately — or rather, hasn’t been in the news. In 1999 two Arkansas perverts raped, tortured, and murdered a 13-year-old boy; that crime has been almost totally ignored by the same news media that spent a year bewailing the murder of the homosexual Matthew Shepard. Because the boy was a victim rather than a victimizer of homosexuals, his story might hurt The Cause. No martyr he!

The standard “gay” line on pedophilia is that most child molesters are heterosexuals. This is sheer propaganda. Homosexuals are only 1 or 2 percent of the general population (despite their inflated claims — also propagandist — of 10 percent), yet they are wildly disproportionate among pedophiles.

What is more important, though, is that most heterosexuals are more than willing to punish molesters of little girls. They don’t make excuses for them or cover up their crimes. They recognize norms of behavior.

But pedophiles are an integral part of the “gay rights” movement. Does that movement repudiate them? Not at all. On the contrary, the North American Man/Boy Love Association is a regular and welcome contingent at “gay pride” marches. In England, organized “gays” agitate for lowering the age of consent for sex.

This stands to reason. Homosexuality is an abandonment not only of the normal, but of any norms. Once you approve of promiscuous anal sex with strangers, how can you draw a line against anything? Why not have anal sex with kids, if that’s your thing?

And once again, the news media — which love to highlight any “extremists” at conservative events — refuse to report on pedophiles in the movement. It might embarrass The Cause. If it’s “diversity” you want, don’t look for it among journalists.

I used to feel sorry for homosexuals. However they became that way, it was an inclination I could only pity them for being saddled with, since so much of normal life was closed off to them. And I understand why parents who find out their sons are homosexual want to protect them, even if it means denying that homosexuality is a serious disorder. That’s natural.

But no parent is glad to learn his son is “gay”; no parent would wish that condition on a child. This is why all the propaganda of “gay pride” rings false. Normal people aren’t even proud of being normal; they take it for granted. But “pride” in an abnormality?

I don’t blame anyone for being sick. I blame them for telling me that sickness is just another form of health.