The Ruger 380 I was looking at is $399 because it comes with a LaserMax. But...I'm not sure if I want to spend $400 plus tax and FFL fees. So, after some searching I came across these less expensive options. Forums are filled with good and bad reviews of every gun, even the most expensive. Obviously the ones I mentioned in the title might have less of a following and less features, but what are your thoughts on these much less expensive alternatives. I'm looking for a carry gun that won't "break the bank".

For what I understand Jimenez is a POS. I've had good experience with Taurus, but not on there .380 line. There customer service worked really well with me when I needed a repair on a 9mm of theres.
Honestly, I think Rugers your best bet. Just get one without a laser. There around 300 without one. Or we'll used to be

I own many firearms including several from each manufacturer. The Jiminez 380 is a lower quality striker fired blow back model that has a pressure fitted and pinned barrel that really needs a little work to feed reliably. Not hard, but more than a fluff and buff. Taurus can be OK if you get a newer one. Watch limp wristing for all of the ultra light 380s. Number 1 cause of feeding problems. Both can be fun but the Ruger is worth saving just a bit longer for.