It simply boils down to this question: how – and I defy a liberal to explain this to me – does bringing in more poor people to compete with the poor people already here for a limited number of jobs – do anything other than undermine the poor people who are already here???

Liberals tell us about migrant field laborers and how nobody else will do those jobs. This argument is contingent upon your being stupid enough to believe that every single illegal immigrant is out in the fields picking our crops and no illegal immigrants have any other kind of job. They idiotically overlook the fact that most agricultural zones are considerable distances from the urban population centers – so there is simply no one reasonably close enough to take those jobs. And the migrant laborers largely live in deplorable conditions and, yes, MIGRATE to the various fields to do the jobs. And they send a great deal of the money they earn back home to their families in other countries such as Mexico. That’s one thing. But another thing is that it is simply a categorical fact today that MOST, IF NOT THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY, OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ARE NOT IN THE FIELDS. THEY ARE WORKING JOBS THAT AMERICAN POOR PEOPLE DO WANT TO WORK. My church has a Hispanic congregation. Many of them are not here legally. I know many of these people. I know what many of them do for a living. Very FEW of them EVER work in ANY field around these parts. No, they are home care assistants, they are tree trimmers, they are construction workers, they are contractors, they cut our hair. And they are in stores and businesses working in jobs that YES LEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND POOR MINORITIES WOULD HAVE TAKEN.

So I ask the question again: how do Democrats do ANYTHING other than undermine and hurt the poor when they demand that more poor people be allowed to keep flowing in to compete for the scarce jobs here???

Why did liberals open the floodgate of illegal immigration? Why do they stupidly refuse to see the obvious and crystal-clear distinction between “legal” immigrants and “ILLEGAL” immigrants? Because there is absolutely ZERO question that the Democrat Party politically and incredibly cynically benefits from a violation of the law that undermines the nation as a whole. And Democrats are nothing if they are not political cockroaches who crawl to any and every dung pile that feeds them. It is a simple fact that Hispanics as a whole overwhelmingly vote Democrat, so therefore the more illegal immigrants – especially given the fact that Democrats have made it IMPOSSIBLE to prevent people from registering to vote and from voting illegally – the better for Democrats. And Democrats couldn’t give less of a DAMN if what they are doing hurts the people who they are keeping ignorant enough to keep voting for them. Democrats count on ignorance and they count on their ability to keep ignorant people on their plantation through propaganda that has ALWAYS been the tool for abusive governments to control their people.

So Democrats actively pursue political strategies that suppress wages for poor people. This is a FACT. And what do they DO about the crisis they created? Why create ANOTHER crisis, of course.

So second, there is the outcry to forcibly raise minimum wages as the left exploits one crisis it created in order to create another crisis. We therefore have the movement to artificially and forcibly raise wages by government fiat. But does that create more jobs and therefore more opportunity or does it do what common sense ought to tell you it does and do the precise OPPOSITE:

In a National Bureau of Economic Research paper published last December, University of California-San Diego professors Jeffrey Clemens and Michael Wither, found that increases in the minimum wage were responsible for 14% of the decline in the percent of the working-age population employed between 2006 and 2012. Minimum wage increases significantly reduced the probability of low-skill workers reaching the middle class.

Aside from the fact that forcing employers to pay more money than they can afford or that the job they would otherwise offer is worth to them, you have another giant dilemma of unintended consequences: artificially imposing higher labor costs ipso facto means imposing higher prices for products and services that poor people have to pay:

… it’s a safe bet that virtually all of the cost of this minimum wage hike will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. You might think that, well, this isn’t a huge deal if it’s rich people who are paying these higher prices.

But of course it will often be poor people who pay them… This makes poor consumers worse off in a direct sense, in that they can purchase less with their earnings. And if consumers are at all sensitive to prices, at least some of them will choose to spend less on labor-intensive goods and services now that they are more expensive. That could reduce the number of minimum wage jobs available.”

Another term for that is “vicious cycle.” We artificially impose higher wages which artificially increases prices, which makes goods and services artificially more expensive to pay those higher wages, which reduces consumers’ ability to purchase those goods and services, which reduces the amount of goods and services purchased, which undermines the job market further. And further.

It’s an easy bogus case to make for demagogues: we’ll force other people to pay you more money. Nothing could be easier. The sad fact – “sad” because liberals hate and despise facts – is this: the BEST way to have a good, well-paying job is to start out in a lousy, sucky-paying job and work your way UP as you demonstrate and document a good work ethic and develop more experience. But when there are fewer and fewer jobs available because fewer and fewer employers can afford to pay for more workers, well, so much for hard work and experience.

And so we have a THIRD way Democrats hatefully hurt the poor: income inequality.

Here’s another nuance of this vicious income inequality for you: poor people tend to try to save toward a better life; wealthy people tend to invest their wealth. Barack Obama and the Democrat Party machine have created a giant debt apparatus that sucks savings. What interest do you get when you put your money in the bank? You get ZERO. Poor people cannot afford to invest and make money the only way the Obama-Democrat-debt machine have built for someone to make money off his or her money. They have created a system – and keep in mind that Wall Street overwhelmingly supported Obama in both of his elections – where the Fed keeps pumping money into the system and the banks lend it at low rates to the big businesses. But if you are poor, if you are on a fixed income, Obama has left you high and dry.

Democrats are simply vile, venal people: they create godawful pain, they literally take a 2X4 and viciously whack somebody on the back of the head, and then they blame the nearest Republican knowing that their ideological counterparts in the mainstream media will duly report the “fact” that Republicans are responsible for the crimes perpetuated over and over and over again by Democrats. It’s called propaganda, and it’s the one and only thing the left has always excelled in.

Poverty and homelessness has skyrocketed under the cancer of the Obama presidency. Poverty has smashed a fifty year record under Obama. Homelessness is skyrocketing. And you should stop wondering why. But whose fault is it? Well, gosh, we can’t blame Bush anymore, so it’s got to be the Republican Congress’ fault, doesn’t it? I mean, yes, we blamed Bush for the economic meltdown even though Democrats were in lock-step control of both the House and the Senate because the president is responsible. Unless of course the president is a demagogic Democrat and then Congress is responsible even when it held only one branch of government.

And so fourth, let’s talk about how incredibly cynical and depraved Democrats are in regards to homelessness. There’s a New York Post story with a picture of a man urinating right in the middle of a public street. The title says it all: “20 Years of Cleaning Up New York City Pissed Away.” It is absolutely pathetic and despicable what Democrats have done to piss away progress and decency. Back when Mayor Rudy Giuliani led New York, for example, the police took an active and proactive role in dealing with homelessness. They would show up with a social worker and not only get that person off the streets, but also HELP that person. But liberals, being hateful, said, no, no, no, these people have a right to be here, blah-blah-blah. The didn’t view them as human beings who needed real help, but as ideological abstractions and as pawns in a leftwing propaganda war.

America’s homeless are lawyering up to fight for a “right” to live on the street — your neighborhood and personal safety be damned.

From Fort Lauderdale to Los Angeles, cities are struggling with a surge in people living in cardboard boxes and doorways. Local lawmakers are trying to ban “camping out” in public, and ordering police to clear the fetid encampments.

But lawyers for the homeless are pushing back. They’re demanding that “sleeping rough” be legally protected. In Denver, where living on the street is outlawed, lawyers for the homeless want to guarantee vagrants “the right to use and move freely in public spaces without discrimination.”

Outrageously, the Obama administration is siding with vagrants against local governments. Obama’s Justice Department is trying to block Boise, Idaho’s ban on sleeping in public. Cities around the country are worried their own laws may be next.

Not New York, of course. In our city, lawyers for the homeless already run City Hall. One of Mayor De Blasio’s top advisers is Steven Banks, a lawyer who spent three decades at the Legal Aid Society and has sued the city numerous times on behalf of the homeless.

Under de Blasio’s tenure, 311 calls complaining about the homeless are up nearly 60 percent. The mayor dismisses that as “hysteria,” insisting the vast majority of homeless “don’t bother anybody.”

Los Angeles — the homeless capital of the nation — is trying to halt the spread of cardboard shanties: Obamavilles. But the city has lost a string of lawsuits, as judges ruled the homeless have constitutional rights to sleep in cars and store their possessions on the sidewalk. […]

The reason the left wants all the crazy people to be walking around free is because otherwise there would be no one to vote DEMOCRAT.

Depravity and chaos and slum is taking over. You’ve got Obama to ENSURE it. The modern Democrat Party wants it, welcomes it, YEARNS for it. They THRIVE on the chaos and the bitterness they create. They incite it and exploit it to keep pushing for more and more and more and worse and worse and worse. They are “progressives” who are progressing America right off the cliff and into hell.

And there’s a consistent pattern if you have eyes to see and ears to hear.

Fifth, there is the terrible, despicable evil that Democrats perpetuated decades over regarding mental illness. Liberals called the horror they imposed in the name of their progressive moral stupidity a broad-based movement called “deinstitutionalization.” So-called “compassionate” liberals came up with the “humane” plan to move patients from long-term commitment in state mental hospitals into community-based mental health treatment. There was the progressive religious faith in science: the Kennedy Administration optimistically described how the days of long-term treatment were now gone forever because newly-developed drugs such as chlorpromazine meant that two-thirds of the mentally ill “could be treated and released within 6 months.” I am accurately quoting Kennedy from his message on mental illness given on February 5, 1963. A liberal can argue that Ronald Reagan signed something – passed by Democrat majorities in both houses of the legislature – along these lines. But Ronald Reagan ALSO signed a bill that same year legalizing abortion in California. Which is to say that in 1967 he wasn’t very conservative by any modern standard. And there is simply no question that the national trend toward deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill was dominated by progressive liberals. At about the same time, two more ideas came to the forefront of American progressive thinking that continue to haunt society today: 1) that there was a right to mental health treatment, and 2) that there was a right to a more substantive form of due process for those who were to be committed to a mental hospital. If there was a right to mental health treatment, then liberal activist judges could use the threat of releasing patients as a way to force reluctant legislatures to increase funding for treatment. ACLU attorneys such as Bruce J. Ennis successfully claimed before moral idiot liberal judges that less than 5 percent of mental hospital patients “are dangerous to themselves or to others” and that the rest were improperly locked up “because they are useless, unproductive, ‘odd,’ or ‘different.’” But these progressive ideas backfired terribly. These two new “rights” imposed by leftists (the “right” to treatment plus the “right” to impose impossible legal burdens on the system) had the horrifying and hateful result of suddenly making hundreds of thousands of seriously mentally ill people homeless and helpless. And it was all done in the name of the same progressivism that we see in Obama and Hillary Clinton today. Because again, the left doesn’t actually give a flying damn about these people; they are like “fetuses,” non-human abstractions that can be destroyed for the sake of some greater leftist cause. Mentally ill people fell through the cracks, living shorter, more miserable lives, and often greatly degrading the quality of urban life for everyone else. And liberals moved on to their next project of collapsing and imploding America.

We USED to get these crazy people of the streets and put them in mental institutions. We used to protect both the mentally ill and society as a whole. But the left said, no, no, no, you can’t do that, you can’t lock these people up against their will. Well, they’re wandering around out in the streets now. They’ve been wandering the streets for decades, ignored by Democrats, because Democrats dishonestly and slanderously use the heinous crimes that the mentally ill commit with the freedom that liberals gave them to decry guns. As if a gun picked itself up and started shooting versus a Democrat releasing a psychopath onto the streets who picked up a gun and started shooting. And so now they’re shooting up movie theaters, etc. etc. and whose fault is the consequences? Republicans for allowing law-abiding citizens to maintain their God-given and constitutionally guaranteed right to defend themselves, their homes and their property from all the whackjobs and criminals liberals have running around on the streets.

Sixth, Black Lives Matter. Well, NO THEY DON’T. Not to liberals, anyway. Do you know how we’ve just had riot after riot because black lives matter so much whenever a black person gets killed by a white cop? Well, that’s the ONLY time “black lives matter” to these horrible political demagogues – and the fact of the matter is a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of way under one percent of all black lives are killed by white cops. We just had a nine-year old girl murdered by black thugs while she was on her mother’s bed doing her homework; she died in her grandmother’s arms, and her life didn’t matter AT ALL to anyone in the “Black Lives Matter” bowel movement. Because they don’t give a flying DAMN about “black lives,” save as how they can cynically exploit a tragedy for the sake of their rabid and venal political ideology. THAT’S all that actually matters to them. The truth is that police kill far more whites than blacks, but Black Lives Matter is about NOTHING but ginning up outrage and bitterness and hate for the sake of their precious political screed.

The left is trying to manufacture a “distinction” to explain why they don’t give a damn for the vast majority of all the black lives callously ended by their own that they don’t give a damn about. They claim that they’re decrying the “state-sponsored murders” of black men. Bullcrap. Unless the black mayor of Baltimore ordered the black states attorney to order the black police chief in Baltimore to gun down black men, THERE ARE NO STATE-SPONSORED KILLINGS. There are rather individual tragedies as some black men are legitimately killed because they tried to face down armed policemen, while others are illegitimately killed in unfortunate accidents as individual untrained or scared cops lost their professional composure in one tragic moment.

A black woman named Peggy Hubbard had enough and showed what real decency looks like as she took down this bowel movement by exposing it for the abject disgrace it truly is.

And just to further expose “Black Lives Matter” for the lie that it is, we now find that it is led by a white man masquerading as black. Because being black means being a VICTIM to the left, and being a VICTIM is the most coveted status by the left. And until black people truly decide they want to be VICTORS rather than VICTIMS, they will live in a sordid condition.

They used to call it “white flight” in the mainstream media “reporting,” which of course meant it was obvious somehow racist. I mean, how DARE that white family – seeing criminality and thuggery overtake their neighborhood – just up and move out and find a better neighborhood for their kids? But now sane, decent people understand that it never had anything to DO with racism; black people and Hispanic people, et al do it to: if you want to be a decent person and raise a decent family and you see low-brow, criminal elements moving in, you either have a community that deals with the scourge or your decent families get the hell out of that budding hellhole. And so we have whole cities that have been dominated by liberalism for a hundred damn years looking like World-War-II-Europe after the heavy bombers leveled them.

Like I said, there is a CONSISTENCY and a PATTERN to what Democrats are doing as they seek the destruction and collapse of the United States of America.

Eighth, consider college tuition. Can’t get a damn job because the Obama economy has crushed the American Dream into the Marxist Utopia hellhole? Well, why not be a college student the rest of your life? I mean, ultimately you’ll be crushed with mindboggling debt because the more liberals drone on – whether that be in a classroom or in the Oval Office – the more it’s gonna cost you in debt you can never possibly hope to ever repay. Don’t ever think for one nanosecond that conservatives have anything to do with the massive cost of college: liberals dominate; conservatives are shown the door because liberals are rabidly intolerant fascists. But now the liberals who made college so astronomically expensive are saying they’ll fix the disaster the created by creating, yes, ANOTHER disaster that will be even MORE expensive. I hear Bernie Saunders and Hillary Clinton trying to outdo each other making college more “free.” But college tuition has skyrocketed under Obama. As colleges and universities have become more and more dominated by liberal-progressive socialism, it has – surprise, surprise – gotten more and more expensive. Now, liberals say it should be FREE for college students. Okay, poor dude who never had a chance to go to college: YOU GET TO PAY FOR ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO GOT TO GET WHAT YOU DON’T GET TO HAVE.

The fact of the matter is that college and universities are dominated by liberalism whether it is in the faculty lounges or in the administration buildings. Liberals are by definition people who constantly whine for more money for themselves in the name of some greater cause. And so there is a one-to-one correlation between how much federal money gets poured into colleges and universities (and ipso facto into liberals’ pockets) and how much tuition keeps going up. The more you allow students to borrow, the higher the tuition price you can suddenly afford.

It’s what’s known as a vicious cycle. Because liberals are vicious.

Ninth, I’m going to talk about women and how the “War on Women” narrative is a despicable charge by the left that is waging the actual war on women in our society. And I’ll end with a discussion of how anyone who actually wanted HEALTH CARE rather than some “insurance card” with a tiny network and sky-high deductibles is a victim of the left. I’ll finish up when I get back from some meetings.

When he was elected to the Georgia House of Representatives in 1965, along with seven other black members, furious white members of the House refused to let him take his seat, accusing him of disloyalty. He was already well known because of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee’s stand against the United States’ involvement in the Vietnam War.

I immediately smelled a rat. Do you know why? Because I have learned through a life of being forced to live through liberal-ideologue propaganda masquerading as “journalism” that if those “furious white members” had been Republican, they would have been exposed and named.

It was a matter of finding out just who these “furious white members of the House” who “refused to let [great black civil rights leader Bond] take his seat” were. I KNEW they were Democrats. Because I know the media is pathologically corrupt and dishonest. But it wasn’t easy. Because I had to keep sifting through all the press accounts that simply stated that “white members” refused to let Julian Bond take his seat. With the obvious implication being, “white” because they were RACIST and this was about RACISM.

I went through a good twenty articles and all I could find was that the members of the House who refused to let Julian Bond take his seat were “white.” NEVER a mention of the political party those racist “white members” belonged to.

But I found one tiny little nugget in the one I cite above. It pointed out that the case went all the way to the Supreme Court. And it told me the year: 1966.

So I entered “Bond” and “Supreme Court” and “v.” and “1966” to find who was fighting Bond to take his seat.

And, of course, yeah, this Democrat who is so esteemed other Democrats named a park after him is a DEMOCRAT.

It was DEMOCRATS who were the “furious white members” who were so pathologically racist they wouldn’t let a black civil rights hero take his seat. But of course that fact refutes the entire dishonest liberal narrative, so no “journalist” would ever bother to report it. Facts only matter if they confirm or can be twisted into appearing to confirm a liberal narrative. So in this case “white members” appears to confirm the liberal narrative of racism so they report “white members” but refuse to report which party the “white racists” belonged to because it would amount to the finger pointers pointing their fingers at THEMSELVES.

It wasn’t just James Floyd who tried to screw Julian Bond. There were plenty of other politicians in the process. For instance, another account of Julian Bond’s life [that I found AFTER finally discovering the name James Floyd] says:

Georgia Governor Carl Sanders declared Bond’s seat vacant. The voters elected him again. The House excluded him again. Bond appealed directly to the Supreme Court.

The Atlantic doesn’t mention which political party is to blame, of course.

Hmm. Wonder which party Carl Sanders belongs to? The mainstream media will never tell you if it’s a damn Democrat, so you can either just figure or you can go to the lengths they don’t want you to go to and be your OWN journalist and look it up. So I looked the name up and:

In the 1962 Democratic gubernatorial primary, Sanders defeated former Governor Marvin Griffin. Sanders received 494,978 votes (58.7 percent) to Griffin’s 332,746 (39 percent).[1] Thereafter, Griffin largely retired from politics. Sanders was the first Georgia governor from an urban area since the 1920s. He was the first modern Georgia governor nominated in the Democratic primary by the popular vote after the abolition of the County Unit System, a kind of electoral college formerly used to elect Georgia governors.

This is a politician who insists that her emails on her private server that she installed are “my personal property.” You know, EXACTLY the same way Richard Nixon installed a voice recorder system in his office and claimed the Watergate tapes were HIS personal property. The problem is that history proves this is an argument for a fascist thug rather than a true leader. If you compare these two incredibly secretive, paranoid, vindictive and dishonest thugs to one another, you will see parallel after parallel. I suppose this is the Democrat Party’s way of humbly apologizing to Nixon: because they clearly want his reincarnation back.

As I understand it, that Marine officer ended up in prison for just ONE improperly handled email. Hillary Clinton is ALREADY in worse shape – and it’s going to get a hell of a lot worse than that as they keep finding more and more emails. If Hillary Clinton does NOT END UP IN PRISON, it is ONLY because the Democrat Party has become the institutional party of political crony fascism and corruption.

I pointed out months ago that Hillary Clinton’s secret email system was grounds for her automatic disqualification: To wit, the obvious question to ask her and to ask every Democrat who supports her is whether every single Republican or Republican political appointee ought to be able to install their own private servers, selectively purge their communications, and be completely above all law and all transparency the way Hillary Clinton has been. If they say no, then Hillary Clinton isn’t fit to be president; if they say yes, then call them the fascist they are right to their face. And I wrote that before it was revealed that she was treating top secret emails like soup recipes over the internet.

If the media had any credibility whatsoever, every single question that every single reporter or journalist asked her would be about what kind of paranoid fascist autocratic dictatorial walking-talking sociopathic narcissistic personality disorder which her emails prove that she clearly is.

You need to understand how much of a LIAR Hillary Clinton’s current email scandals have with crystal clarity already revealed her to be (with MANY more shoes or fascist jackboots to drop). She has been one – the historical record proves – over the course of her entire LIFE. I want you to see Hillary Clinton’s email scandal for what it is – the longstanding continuation of the lies of a pathological liar. I want you to first see the dishonest and frankly evil woman who is basically saying, “Everyone needs to implicitly trust me. Even AFTER I wiped my server clean to purge the evidence.”

So let’s start with some history of the pathological liar a.k.a. Hillary Rodham Clinton before pointing out that the following “lying, unethical, dishonest lawyer” who has “conspired to violate the Constitution” all her life. Then we’ll move on to her current scandal where she has proven still further what a by-nature pathological corrupt fascist political Jezebel she truly is:

As a 27-year old lawyer Hillary Clinton was fired from her position during the Watergate investigation for “lying, unethical behavior.” And worse. And you already see the pathologically twisted mindset. Let me set this up for you: You have a LIFELONG Democrat supervising Hillary. But this supervisor came to realize that Hillary Clinton was playing a game with an incredibly dishonest and unethical agenda. This was supposed to be a process about JUSTICE, but Hillary Clinton was, is and always will be a pure political vicious animal. Her agenda was to KEEP Nixon in the White House so her political patron Ted Kennedy would have a clearer shot at the White House; and at the same time to cynically abuse the process of justice to protect Kennedy from the record of history “that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach.” In short, Hillary Clinton from the very start of her career revealed herself to be “an unethical, dishonest lawyer” who “violated the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” Hillary Clinton is a dishonest piece of fascist trash, and she always HAS BEEN a dishonest piece of fascist trash:

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation … one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals … including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum … who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.

Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach… including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.

The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.

The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970.

“As soon as the impeachment resolutions were introduced by (then-House Minority Leader Gerald) Ford, and they were referred to the House Judiciary Committee, the first thing Douglas did was hire himself a lawyer,” Zeifman said.

The Judiciary Committee allowed Douglas to keep counsel, thus establishing the precedent. Zeifman says he told Hillary that all the documents establishing this fact were in the Judiciary Committee’s public files.

So what did Hillary do?

“Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,”Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding … as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

How was this ethical fiasco “resolved”?

Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

Of course, Nixon’s resignation rendered the entire issue moot, ending Hillary’s career on the Judiciary Committee staff in a most undistinguished manner. Zeifman says he was urged by top committee members to keep a diary of everything that was happening. He did so, and still has the diary if anyone wants to check the veracity of his story. Certainly, he could not have known in 1974 that diary entries about a young lawyer named Hillary Rodham would be of interest to anyone 34 years later.

But they show that the pattern of lies, deceit, fabrications and unethical behavior was established long ago – long before the Bosnia lie, and indeed, even before cattle futures, Travelgate and Whitewater – for the woman who is still asking us to make her president of the United States.

So someone might read the full account and say, well, Zeifman didn’t remember every single fact completely clearly and blah blah blah. But let’s continue to check Hillary Clinton’s honesty:

Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor’s wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker.

She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe

We could look at TravelGate and Hillary Clinton’s determination that “We need those people out and we need our people in.” We could look at how even liberal newspapers like the Los Angeles Times acknowledge that Hillary Clinton lied under oath in that particular scandal. We could likewise look at the long lists of other Clinton scandals that were pretty much all over everywhere in those days. But there are literally just way too many lies to even wave a stick at.

Don’t think that anyone can-out 9/11 victim Hillary Clinton. On September 17th 2001, Hillary told Jane Pauley on NBC’s dateline that Chelsea had gone on “what she thought would be a great jog” and that she was going to go around the towers of the World Trade Center. “And then the plane hit,” Hillary stated.

Senator HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: She’d gone what she thought would be a great jog. She was going down to the Battery Park, she was going to go around the towers. She went to get a cup of coffee and–and that’s when the plane hit.

PAULEY: She was close enough to hear the rumble.

Sen. CLINTON: She did hear it. She did.

PAULEY: And to see the smoke…

But wait: it turned out that none of that was true: Chelsea did NOT go for a jog around the towers – great or otherwise – she did NOT get a cup of coffee, she did NOT hear the rumble and she did not see the smoke. In fact, Chelsea was safely watching the attack on television from her Union Square apartment. The left can try to spin it into some subtle nuance, but this was just another episode of Hillary Clinton pulling a Brian Williams and falsely and routinely imposing herself or her family into events of history.

These were simply transparent, easily falsifiable lies. Hillary has lied like this her entire life. The only reason she hasn’t been completely destroyed by her dishonesty is her place (by marriage) in the Democrat Party, the protection from her political cronies and the fact that Democrats are simply dishonest people as a whole who frankly as dishonest liars don’t CARE that Hillary is a dishonest liar. When you add the fact that the media has become every bit as partisan and as ideological and as propagandistic as any communist country, you have the very class that is supposed to EXPOSE a Hillary Clinton actively trying to PROTECT her.

I’m just going to put it bluntly here and now. Anyone whose faith is not forever destroyed in Hillary Clinton is simply a venal, vile, wicked demoniac. She has been a vile, morally obscene creature all her life and she is more of all of the above now than ever.

It’s not enough for me to say I wouldn’t trust Hillary Clinton with my child or even that I wouldn’t trust her with my dog. No freaking way. But I wouldn’t even trust Hillary Clinton with a rabid rat, because she’d torture it just for laughs and then let it go to hopefully bite people. She’s proven that all her life.

This from the woman who the very first moment she got power, she had a super-secret personal email system installed in her home to bypass all security and all accountability and all transparency so she could purge any communications that proved her to be the lifelong criminal that she is. And how can anyone not see what a pathologically dishonest hypocrite of the very worst and lowest sort Hillary Clinton truly is?

And to just add to that, this is a woman who is now claiming that all the criticisms of her OWN “stunning record of secrecy and corruption, of cronyism run-amok” that is “everything our founders were afraid of, everything our Constitution was designed to prevent” is all somehow merely what? “The same old partisan games.” You know, the same way it was a “vast, rightwing conspiracy” for Bill Clinton to receive blow jobs in the Oval Office from an intern.

Well, obviously you know what “the same old partisan games” look like, don’t you, Hillary Clinton, you political Jezebel if there ever has been one since the wicked original? BECAUSE YOU’VE PLAYED THOSE COCKROACH GAMES ALL YOUR MISERABLE LIFE. And in fact you played them against the very last Republican administration that wasn’t guilty of a tiny fraction of the very same crimes you’re trying to deflect NOW. And now people are supposed to rise to your defense because you’re hanging from your own petard. So Hillary Clinton now shrilly yells, “I won’t get down in the mud with them. I won’t play politics with national security.” You mean the same way YOU climbed into that same mud like the obscene political pig you are and wallowed in it the last time a Republican was in office??? Hillary Clinton is an insult to integrity and an insult to intelligence and the only question to ask of anyone who supports her is whether he or she is more wicked than stupid or more stupid than wicked. An d that is a proven fact according to Hillary Clinton’s own current dishonest rhetoric vis-à-vis her own previous dishonest rhetoric.

the Associated Press has obtained documents conclusive proving that “Hillary Rodham Clinton emailed her staff on an iPad as well as a BlackBerry while secretary of state, despite her explanation she exclusively used a personal email address on a homebrew server so that she could carry a single device.”

This same Hillary Clinton who said “I won’t play politics with national security”? Yeah, she played politics with national security to such an astonishing degree that she is the VERY FIRST American public official to do all of her national security business ENTIRELY through a private email server that had no encryption whatsoever.

Venafi, a Salt Lake City computer security firm, has conducted an analysis of clintonemail.com and determined that “for the first three months of Secretary Clinton’s term, access to the server was not encrypted or authenticated with a digital certificate.” In other words: For three months, Clinton’s server lay vulnerable to snooping, hacking, and spoofing.

In other words, it was completely open to foreign intelligence services and was undoubtedly penetrated. Bob Gourley, former chief technology officer at the Defense Intelligence Agency, states that “I have no doubt in my mind that this thing was penetrated by multiple foreign powers, to assume otherwise is to put blinders on.”

A week before becoming secretary of state, Hillary Clinton set up a private e-mail system that gave her a high level of control over communications, including the ability to erase messages completely, according to security experts who have examined Internet records.

“You erase it and everything’s gone,” Matt Devost, a security expert who has had his own private e-mail for years. Commercial services like those from Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. retain copies even after users erase them from their in-box.

This is an abject disgrace and Hillary Clinton BELONGS IN A PRISON CELL doing hard time.

When Hillary finally got around to bothering to install any security whatsoever, she screwed the pooch and ended up with a “misconfigured encryption system.” I mean, it was kind of like her criminal incompetence with Benghazi, only with her own damn server that she installed so she could delete the evidence of her crimes and make her Orwellian disappearances of the factual record permanent. And just like Orwell’s Oceania, Hillary couldn’t have cared less what the rival global power Eurasia and Eastasia that Oceania was at constant war with knew: her cover up was only against her OWN people.

But, no, this shrew Jezebel would NEVER “play politics with national security,” would she? No politics with a secret private server that she installed specifically for her ability to control and purge any and all communications that she didn’t want anyone but FOREIGN FREAKING GOVERNMENTS to see.

Previous top officials used the government secure system for their business and a private email account – BUT NOT A PERSONAL SERVER MEANING THAT THEY COULD NOT WIPE AND PURGE THEIR EMAILS – for private communications. Hillary Clinton is the FIRST and ONLY top public official to use an entirely private server to send and receive top secret classified intelligence as well as emails from her husband. Oh, wait a minute: her husband exposed that last one as yet another Hillary Clinton lie:

At a press conference on Tuesday, Hillary Clinton said the server that housed her emails while she was secretary of state (that was reportedly housed at her home in New York) was set up for President Bill Clinton. She also said that some of the “personal” emails she deleted were between her and her husband.

But just before Hillary began the press conference at the United Nations building, the Wall Street Journal reported that Bill Clinton does not use email.

“The former president, who does regularly use Twitter, has sent a grand total of two emails during his entire life, both as president, says Matt McKenna, his spokesman,” WSJ reported. “After leaving office, Mr. Clinton established his own domain that staff use — @presidentclinton.com. But Mr. Clinton still doesn’t use email himself, Mr. McKenna said.”

One of Bill’s emails was to astronaut and former Sen. John Glenn, the other was to U.S. troops.

But Hillary said during her press conference that her email server “contains personal communications from my husband and me.”

Hey, it’s understandable that Hillary Clinton would believe there were just all kinds of personal communications from her husband when in fact there wasn’t so much as a single one. Just like it’s understandable that she had no idea where her daughter was on 9/11 or that no her grandparents WEREN’T all immigrants or that no she actually was NOT named after Sir Edmund Hillary or that gosh it sure seemed like explosions were rocking her as she raced across the tarmac frantically clutching her daughter’s little hand when in fact the only “sniper” was an 8-year-old girl holding flowers rather than a rifle. And that it seemed like we were dead broke because we only had millions of dollars with hundreds of millions more hanging on the vine. All honest mistakes, I’m telling ya. Every single one.

Why on earth would anyone EVER believe ANYTHING this liar says??? I mean, okay, we know that there were in fact ZERO emails between Hillary Clinton and her husband. So the only reason that she purged and wiped her server is because what? Her “yoga routines” got a little too hot and heavy??? Who tries to wipe a server WHILE IT WAS UNDER A SUBPOENA claiming her yoga schedule had to be protected?

Hillary began by claiming that she most certainly had never used her private email server – you know, the one that she dishonestly said she installed so she wouldn’t have to use multiple devices and which she dishonestly and unethically purged because of her lie that it contained private communications between her and her husband – to EVER send or receive ANY classified material whatsoever:

“I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. There is no classified material,” Clinton declared at her March press conference.

But holy crap, what an unholy lie that proved to be. Keep in mind, Hillary PURGED or aborted 32,000 emails from her server without ANY third party being allowed to see them so that everyone would have to trust ENTIRELY on the word of honor of a proven LIAR and graciously allowed 30,00 of her email babies to survive the womb of her private server system. But of those:

Among the 30,490 e-mails that Clinton handed the State Department last December, the inspector general for the intelligence community (ICIG) sampled 40 and discovered that four (or 10 percent) were classified. Of these, two (or 5 percent) “when originated” were designated “TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN.”

So out of a random sample of forty emails that were examined, it turned out that two or five percent were not only classified but classified at the very highest level of classification.

And holy MOSES, just that five percent of truly TOP SECRET emails alone amounts to FIFTEEN THOUSAND TWO-HUNDRED AND FORTY-FIVE EMAILS of top secret emails if that five percent figure were to be a representative sample. Hillary Clinton doesn’t play political games with national security??? Seriously????

The Department of Justice said it is weighing whether to launch its own investigation after the inspector general for intelligence agencies notified the agency that classified information that went through the account appeared to have been mishandled. Administration officials and investigators declined to share details about the emails. But in a separate memo to lawmakers, the inspector general said that a review of just 40 of the 30,000 emails from the Clinton server found that four had information that should have been marked and handled as classified.

Clinton has made many assurances in recent months that she did not send or receive classified information on her personal server. Her campaign says the material in question had not been specifically marked as classified and, thus, Clinton broke no rules. The inspector general disputed that characterization in a statement late Friday, saying that the information in the emails was classified at the time, even if it wasn’t marked as such, and shouldn’t have been transmitted on a personal email system.

Even so, the revelation was an uncomfortable one for the candidate. And national security experts said the disclosure that that material that should have been marked classified made its way to Clinton’s personal email account at the very least fuels legitimate speculation about how the server was used.

“It tells us why this was such a bad idea,” said Stewart A. Baker, a former general counsel to the National Security Agency now in private practice. “It raises questions.”

Among them, Baker said, was whether staffers deliberately avoided marking sensitive emails to Clinton as classified so they could sidestep the bureaucrats who handle transmission of such material.

“She skipped the government circles and nobody was overseeing this and nobody was saying, ‘This info should not be on this system,’” Baker said. “If anything, there was an incentive for people to cross the line without making clear they were doing so.”

In other words, what Hillary Clinton did was set up a system to DELIBERATELY SIDESTEP THE CLASSIFICATION BUREAUCRACY and strip the classification markers from the emails she sent and receive so she could later walk out and claim that there was nothing marked classified. Which is full-lawyer-mode given her proven lie that she never had any classified material to begin with. But she’s the Jezebel shrew who set up the bypassing system in the first place.

So Hillary Clinton is no different from the murderous thug-punk who viciously wipes out her entire family and then claims she shouldn’t be prosecuted because after all, she’s an orphan, isn’t she? And in this age of “the war on women” that Hillary Clinton viciously waged against a 12-year-old girl who was raped by pedophiles, I mean, have you no heart at all?

And, I mean, which Secretary of State HASN’T sold the office to foreign entities such as nation-state enemies like Russia or foreign corporations like UBS??? You can’t PROVE she did anything!!! At least not without all those tens of thousands of emails she deleted or that server she wiped clean AFTER having been subpoenaed with the proven-false excuse that they contained private communications with her husband that they in actual fact did not contain.

Truly, there has never breathed a soul more dead than Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And there has never breathed an American more historically proven to be unfit for president.

It’s an interesting tactic that you see as the essence of all terrorist movements. America saw it most clearly during the Vietnam War: the communist – in other words the political leftists – terrorized and killed as many people as they could in order to make the population turn against the political system so they could seize power. Which they ultimately did. The idea was, “Look at this horrible government; why, they can’t even keep you safe!”

Of course, it was the leftist communists who were saying that who were doing all the murdering that the government couldn’t keep the people safe from. But that was besides the point.

Now, you might ask yourself why a people would ever allow a group of brutal murdering thugs to gain power by murdering them, but the fact is that it has happened over and over and over again.

It’s happening here in America.

My visual picture is a Democrat coming up behind an unknowing victim, viciously hitting the man in the back of the head with a baseball bat, throwing the bat near a Republican, and then shrieking hysterically, “Look what that terrible Republican just did!”

And a leftist “journalist” duly reports the “fact” that a Republican just viciously assaulted a poor, innocent victim. And don’t think for a moment that poor, innocent victim will ever vote Republican.

You say, “you’re crazy.” Democrats don’t do anything like that. They love the poor.

Yeah, right.

I came across an article from the AP that said EXACTLY what Republicans said over and OVER and OVER again about what ObamaCare would do:

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) – Miriam Uribe enrolled in California’s low-income health insurance program last November, and she still hasn’t found a primary care doctor 10 months later who could see her.

“Once you have (insurance), you actually still don’t have it because it’s still a struggle to find someone,” the 20-year-old college student from Bellflower said.

Uribe isn’t alone. Even though Latinos make up nearly half of California’s 12.5 million Medi-Cal enrollees, a report by the independent California HealthCare Foundation found that 36 percent of the Spanish-speaking Medi-Cal population has been told that a physician won’t take them, compared to 7 percent of the overall Medi-Cal population. Even those who speak both English and Spanish reported similar difficulty accessing doctors.

“The numbers are very, very shocking,” said Sarah de Guia, executive director of the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network, a multicultural health advocacy group.

De Guia said the study doesn’t explain why Latinos — whether they speak English or Spanish — are being turned away at higher rates, but public policy officials say the biggest obstacle is finding doctors who are willing to take the lower payments offered by Medi-Cal. Language barriers also play a role.

What did Republicans say would happen? We said doctors would leave medicine. They’ve left medicine in DROVES. We said there was a giant difference between the bait-and-switch deception from Democrats that having health insurance was the same thing as having actual health care. We said people would end up paying more and more and getting less and less. We said that more people than EVER would end up flooding into emergency rooms because that was where ObamaCare would ultimately drive them.

All of which has happened. Even the New York Times is forced to acknowledge the dilemma people like Karen Pineman of Manhattan face by being “Insured, but Not Covered.” We’ve found out the hard way that “Even consumers with health insurance get hit with surprisingly large medical bills” as ObamaCare has caused deductibles to SKYROCKET. Democrats have these incredibly false studies that claim that premiums haven’t gone up by as much as they did in the past (after Obama himself swore that his ObamaCare would bend the cost curve DOWN); but what they do is dishonestly count all the people who get “subsidies” rather than honestly dealing with all the people who are now forced to pay massively more to subsidize all those subsidies. And of course the problem that the people who have those subsidies don’t actually have “health care” but “health insurance” that doesn’t allow them to actually see a damn doctor.

So what do you have BECAUSE of ObamaCare? You’ve got fewer doctors in smaller networks. Just as Republicans warned and tried to scream about as Democrats without a SINGLE Republican vote passed the bill that no one had even bothered to read in the middle of the night with frankly undemocratic and unconstitutional shenanigans and outright bribery.

But whose fault is it that the health care system has been destroyed? The party that voted against the destruction of the health care system.

In my analogy, the Democrat came up behind an unsuspecting, unaware victim and viciously whacked him in the head. The poor victim never saw it coming. And then he believed the accusations as to who had committed the vicious assault, blaming everyone BUT the one who actually hit him.

That’s exactly what has happened to America. The Democrat Party has destroyed the American Dream. But they count on the ignorance of the people they are hurting, they count on their lies and they count on the leftist ideologues who constitute the overwhelming majority of our “journalists.” And they’ve largely gotten away with it because we live in an age of deception just before the beast comes.

I have a very dear friend who is everything the Democrat Party says it wants to help. She’s a woman. She’s a Hispanic. She’s a single mother of seven children. She’s poor.

She’s a home care nurse who can’t get a full-time job because anyone who paid her full-time hours would have to provide health care benefits. She’s working seven hours a day for four days a week. That keeps her under Obama’s death-for-businesses threshold. You really can’t blame businesses for trying to survive this wicked president. And what we’re finding is a death of full-time jobs for the people who most need them because they aren’t making high hourly wages and therefore need to be allowed to work more hours to make more money. The same thing of course happens when the left forces businesses to pay $15 an hour minimum wage; for those who keep their jobs it’s obviously nice, but for a lot of other people they lose their jobs and many jobs that would have been created never will be thanks to Democrats. You really have to wonder just who the fascist hell Democrats think they are for telling workers, “You CAN’T work unless you get paid what we say you have to be paid,” and tell employers, “You better think TWICE before you create a job.” Versus conservatives who say that people ought to be allowed to decide how much they’re willing to pay and how much pay they’re willing to receive for a given job.

Now, I understand. Again, the left comes out with the most bogus statistics such as Obama’s “low” unemployment rate – I mean, George Bush AVERAGED over eight years what has been Obama’s best unemployment MONTH, but I guess that’s beside the point – that are based on eliminating out THE most important facts such as our plummeting labor participation rate and any measurement of those who are being underutilized in the labor force.

Under Obama, we have the fewest people as a percentage of our work force actually WORKING with JOBS than we’ve seen in forty damn years (back when men traditionally worked while their wives stayed home and took care of the household and the children).

Let’s take a real look at Obama’s unemployment rate, measured by the fuller and more accurate U-6 measurement. Let’s compare that rate with George W. Bush’s – who sustained his OWN economic meltdown at the hands of his predecessor as Bill Clinton handed Bush his DotCom Bubble Bust that wiped out $7.1 TRILLION dollars from the U.S. economy and wiped out 78.6% of the Nasdaq stock exchange. The Bush economy took a HEAVY blow from that, just as he took a massively heavy blow from the 9/11 attack that terrified our economy into paralysis that was also Bill Clinton’s fault as he decimated the CIA and our intelligence capability, gutted the military and emboldened a man named Osama bin Laden into calling the United States a “paper tiger” because Clinton had been a paper tiger PRESIDENCY. But with two presidencies to compare data, let’s take a look at the following U-6 monthly rates and do the math by adding them up for each president and dividing by the number of months in office.

As of July 2015, we find that George Bush had an 8.35% U-6 rate. Versus Obama who has a 14.54% U-6 rate. That’s Great Depression level there, folks.

When you count the fact that our population has grown by nearly 16 million people since Obama took office. We need JOBS for those people. And Obama is touting monthly “job creation numbers” that aint even anywhere CLOSE to what we need just to sustain our population.

Democrats are the party of more taxes, more regulations, more laws, more punishment for job creators, more burdens to prevent them from expanding and being able to hire workers.

Obama came promising he would end the income inequality between the rich and the poor. The funny thing is that because of his morally and economically retarded policies, WE HAVE SEEN THE WORST INCOME INEQUALITY IN HISTORY UNDER OBAMA. To the tune of a four times greater rate of income inequality than occurred under the hated George W. Bush.

Even the reliably liberal Huffington Post was forced to acknowledge this fact:

The difference between America’s median and average wages grew at a rate of 0.28 percent under President Bush, while it’s grown at a rate of 1.14 percent — or about four times that — under Obama, according to The New York Times. The median wage is the midpoint of all workers’ wages, so it only ticks up when everyone is earning more. While a small group of people earning higher pay can push the average wage up.

This data point is one of many that illustrates that in Obama’s America the rich are gaining while the rest of us are struggling to get by. The wealthy took home a greater share of the nation’s income during the years following the recession, under Obama, than between 2002 and 2007, under Bush, according to a 2012 analysis from Emmanuel Saez, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

So the poor are getting screwed by this president even as he promises to be the exact opposite of what he actually is. While demonizing the former president who in actuality is his better in every damn way under the sun.

But what if you’re black? I mean, surely Obama has been great for black people. I mean, right? Things must be going just peachy for black people.

NOT. The more a group of people – well, other than filthy rich crony-capitalist types who have ALWAYS benefited from leftist socialism and fascism – count on Democrats and Obama, the worse the lot has been for that group of people. Which is why Obama has destroyed ANY chance of black people getting a damn job to the tune of 12 MILLION black people who are not in the labor force.

As I said, the worst terrorist/guerilla organizations don’t wage their war against the armed soldiers who will fight them; they wage it against the population. They count on the ignorance and fear of that population to drive a wedge of confidence between the people and the government that’s trying to keep them safe from the terrorist guerillas. It’s an incredibly cynical and exploitative strategy that has historically worked. And it’s working for the Democrat Party.

All the worst cities in America have had Democrat leadership for a hundred damn years. And the misery means nothing to Democrats but a chance to inflict MORE misery and blame the Republicans for it.

As I said, Democrats count on the ignorance and frankly the stupidity of their victims to keep blaming the Republican Party for what? for it’s failure to STOP the Democrat Party from inflicting death and destruction and poverty and despair on them.

Obama gave a press conference in which he yammered on and on about how it was either his deal, lock stock and barrel, or else it was total Armageddon nuclear holocaust global thermonuclear war. According to Obama, his deal is tantamount to the Word of the Living God and ANY violation of His Holy Word will send the entire world down to a fiery hell.

Me, I think of the words of a wise theologian who once quipped, “Now, you might have a better plan than God. But what you DON’T have is your own universe.”

The problem is that Obama as a malignant narcissist actually believes he DOES have his own universe. And it’s Obama’s universe and therefore Obama’s rules. And of course ONLY Obama’s rules need apply in Obama’s universe. Obama created his universe by the word of his omnipotent power and we are all merely his creatures. We were created to be implements of Obama’s will and to deviate from Obama’s will is the definition of “sin.”

“Just because Iranian hardliners chant ‘death to America’ does not mean that that’s what all Iranians believe,” Obama said to applause during his speech at American University.

“In fact, it’s those hardliners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It’s those hardliners chanting ‘death to America’ who have been most opposed to the deal. They are making a common cause with the Republican caucus,” Obama said.

Understand, it’s NOT the Ayatollah, it’s NOT the Iranian military, it’s NOT the Iranian mullahs who chant “death to America!” who are the enemies of all that is good. Because they are on the LORD God Obama’s side. No. It is the Republicans who are evil and should be destroyed by the fire of hell that comes from the mouth of Obama at every press conference.

This deal Obama and John Kerry made wouldn’t have got off the ground unless all these chanters of death to America hadn’t signed on. That is simply something called a “fact.”

Which is to say that all the actual rabid ENEMIES of the United States are ALL on OBAMA’S side. It is the Ayatollah, the rabid types, that are allowing this death-to-America deal with Obama to happen.

But Obama – the Creator of His Own Reality – is asserting that if you don’t agree with the Ayatollah and want this damn deal, well, you must be on the Ayatollah’s side. He is prevaricating – a fancy word for “lying right out of his skinny little weasel ass – in the most amazing and astounding way imaginable by implying that the Iranian people are the one’s who want this deal and the Ayatollah and the military and the parliament and the council are being forced to comply with it.

This couldn’t be more laughably untrue.

The man is simply demon-possessed, pure and simple. Obama lives in a world of lies. And I literally quote the words of Jesus to get right to the cockroach ESSENCE of Obama:

“You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” — John 8:44

When you go back and you see the massive ocean of outright LIES that Obama has been documented to have told over and over and over again on THE most important national issues, you can see with crystal clarity that Obama truly does belong to his father, the devil. It was Obama who claimed THIRTY-SEVEN TIMES that if you like your doctor you could keep your doctor and if you liked your health plan you could keep your health plan to deceive his way to his demonic ObamaCare takeover of the health care system that is one-sixth of the US economy. It was Obama who said THIRTY-TWO TIMES just since al Qaeda launched a terrorist attack that resulted in the murder of the first US ambassador since the failed Carter presidency – which attack Obama LIED about and said it was NOT the terrorist attack that it was – that Obama had somehow “decimated” al Qaeda. Obama said at least TWENTY-TWO TIMES that he did not have the authority – and that he would be an emperor, that he would be an anti-democratic tyrant – to do and then did anyway.

I simply state as a categorical, documented FACT that when Obama lies, he speaks his native language. Because he truly does belong to his father, the devil, and he truly wants to carry out his father’s desires.

One of the things is the participants of the Iran nuclear deal that Obama and Kerry and Democrats keep citing as “the whole world.” Who wrote this godforsaken deal? Well, Russia, China and Iran were every bit as much at the table as anyone. Pardon me for being skeptical.

Especially when we see what just happened. Espeically when we see what Obama’s “ally” in the Iran nuclear deal negotiations just did. Especially when we see that there are no actual sanctions whatsoever in actual place against Iran any longer thanks to Obama and his “deal”:

The shadowy Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani recently visited Moscow to meet with senior Russian leaders, according to two Western intelligence sources, despite a travel ban and U.N. Security Council resolutions barring him from leaving Iran.

On July 24, one week before Secretary of State John Kerry testified to the Senate Armed Services Committee and faced questions about the newly struck nuclear deal, Soleimani arrived in Moscow for meetings with Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and President Vladimir Putin. It was not immediately clear what the Iranian leader discussed, but the revelation comes as the United Nations and European Union arms embargo against Iran is slated to be lifted in five years as part of the comprehensive nuclear agreement announced July 14 from Vienna.

Soleimani was first designated a terrorist and sanctioned by the U.S. in 2005 for his role as a supporter of terrorism. In October 2011, the U.S. Treasury Department tied Soleimani to the failed Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States at a popular restaurant in Washington, D.C. The Quds Force is the special forces external wing of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, responsible for supporting terrorist proxies across the Middle East. It reports directly to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Soleimani is increasingly being recognized as a key player and point person as Iranian influence in the region grows, despite assurances from Kerry and others that Soleimani and the Quds Force will continue to face sanctions from the U.S. Treasury after U.N. sanctions are lifted against Soleimani as part of the nuclear deal.

Soleimani arrived in Moscow on Air Iran flight #5130, a commercial flight from Tehran, at 6:50 a.m. on July 24, a Friday. He left Moscow the following Sunday, July 26, at 10:25 p.m. on flight #5120, according to Western intelligence sources.

U.N. sanctions have not yet been lifted against Iran, and Soleimani, as head of the Iranian Quds Force is sanctioned as part of Security Council Resolution 1747. He is prohibited to travel, and any country that lets him transit or travel is defying the sanctions. (Russia is a permanent member of the Security Council and would have been aware of this restriction when meeting with him.)

Soleimani has been photographed during recent battles against the Islamic State in Iraq leading troops and advising Iranian backed Shia militias, most notably in the battle for Tikrit in March.

Apart from his official meetings in Moscow, Soleimani reportedly had some “fun time” built into his schedule that involved Russian entertainment.

Outgoing U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno characterized the Iranian general in an exclusive exit interview with Fox News: “Qassem Soleimani is the one who has been exporting malign activities throughout the Middle East for some time now. He’s absolutely responsible for killing many Americans, in fact I would say the last two years I was there the majority of our casualties came from his surrogates, not Sunni or Al Qaeda.” […]

With friends like Russia, well, we might as well be friends with Iran, too.

New satellite images of an Iranian site thought to be used for work on a nuclear weapon show crates, trucks and construction that may indicate a renewed attempt to clean up the facility before an inspection by the U.N., a nonproliferation watchdog said Thursday.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly raised concerns about previous possibly attempts to clean up the site, located in Parchin.

But the new report by the Institute for Science and International Security — a Washington-based think tank frequently consulted by the U.S. government — is significant because the IAEA will soon visit the site as part of the new nuclear deal, The Associated Press reported.

In an email to AP, the institute cited the images, saying they show “renewed activity” at the site that “could be related to refurbishment or cleanup prior to any IAEA inspection of the taking of environmental samples.”

The images show what appear to be a bulldozer or a steamroller, containers that have been repositioned and two new structures of “unknown purpose” that appeared between late May and early June, AP reported.

Iran’s foreign ministry has called the report “baseless (and) ridiculous” and attributed the construction to road repairs.

Iran has refused access to Parchin for years and has denied any work on nuclear arms in the area. However the IAEA, using U.S., Israeli and other intelligence and its own research, suspects that Iran may have have experimented with high-explosive detonators for nuclear arms at that military facility south of Tehran, and other weapons-related work elsewhere.

You’ve got to ask yourself: if Iran hasn’t done anything wrong, just what the hell are they covering up???

This deal is beyond insane. It is evil. It is the betrayal of the United States of America – which Iran calls the Great Satan – and the betrayal of Israel, which Iran calls the Little Satan. And as a Republican candidate for president rightly said, Obama is forcing Israel to the very door of the ovens.

Obama is the living embodiment of “death to America.” Pure and simple.

Obama has successfully dismantled the UN Sanctions against Iran. He did so to force the hand of Congress to vote for his insanely wicked deal. There are now NO international sanctions and we will NEVER get them back unless Russia and China agree to them again – which they never will.

Iran WILL get the nuclear bomb. That is a categorical fact of this deal. And it will be entirely due to the most treasonous president and the most treasonous political party in American history: the Democrat Party and their dictator.

It is an amazing disgrace to reason to listen to Barack Obama. He has been parading around claiming that we either get his Iran deal or there is going to be a WAR to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. And there isn’t even a theoretical POSSIBILITY of any other option, or else Barack Hussein Obama is an agent of Satan and a demon-possessed liar. The ONLY two possibilities are Obama’s Beatific DEAL or Armageddon.

But I remember Obama and every single other Democrat assuring the American people that Iran was NOT a nuclear threat and did NOT have any nuclear weapons aspirations. I remember every single Democrat personally attacking and demonizing President George W. Bush as a warmonger for even claiming that Iran had nuclear weapons aspirations:

Democratic presidential candidates teamed up during a National Public Radio debate here Tuesday to blast the Bush administration over its policy toward Iran, arguing that a new intelligence assessment proves that the administration has needlessly ratcheted up military rhetoric.

While the candidates differed somewhat over the level of threat Iran poses in the Mideast, most of them sought to liken the administration’s approach to Iran with its buildup to the war in Iraq.

“I vehemently disagree with the president that nothing’s changed and therefore nothing in American policy has to change,” said New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. “We do know that pressure on Iran does have an effect. I think that is an important lesson.”

Delaware Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the new intelligence report indicated that Iran dropped its program before international pressure came into play.

“It was like watching a rerun of his statements on Iraq five years earlier,” Biden said. “Iran is not a nuclear threat to the United States of America. Iran should be dealt with directly, with the rest of the world at our side. But we’ve made it more difficult now, because who is going to trust us?”

The debate was aired without a studio audience over NPR, live from the Iowa State Historical Museum. It covered Iran, China and immigration, offering the contenders a chance to delve more deeply into subjects that often receive less detailed debate treatment.

Which is to say that George W. Bush was ENTIRELY RIGHT and Iran WAS a nuclear threat. And it CONTINUED to be a threat. And every Democrat then and now should have been and should be hunted down with dogs and burned alive for their treasonous refusal to protect America.

Democrats have ALWAYS been completely wrong and they always WILL BE completely wrong.

To the extent that we either end up with Obama’s deal or war, it is for the very simple reason that Obama structured it that way. Obama spent the last eight years – THE LAST EIGHT YEARS!!! – weakening America’s resolve to stop Iran from going nuclear. He spent the last eight years doing NOTHING to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear power. He has painstakingly disassembled EVERY international structure and stricture that could have kept Iran from building a nuclear weapon. He had the plan to make it so that there was literally nothing LEFT but his treasonous “deal.”

I watched Obama’s speech today on his Iran deal. Until I ran to the toilet and started vomiting when he started trying to imply that he’s the spirit of JFK, come back from heaven.

You have to allude to the words from a previous politician taking apart another politician who tried to compare himself to JFK:

Senator [Obama], I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you’re no Jack Kennedy.

Now, I DO think that Kennedy might have been much more of a leftist if he hadn’t been mugged by something called REALITY. But the FACT remains that the Soviet Union acted as aggressively as they did at the beginning of Kennedy’s presidency because they believed he was a left-wing wuss like Obama who didn’t have the stomach for a fight. JFK had to show the moral courage of a man who was willing to respond to the world; Barack Obama is a malignant narcissist who keeps saying, “the world will respond to me.”

Which is to say Obama is flat-out WRONG; but he doesn’t look at the world the way it is and frankly CANNOT see the world as it is: he looks at the world as he wants to “fundamentally transform” it. So he continues to blather speeches that have nothing whatsoever to do with the way the world actually is.

History has now proven that it is utterly impossible to drive it through the skull of this messianic-complex moron that he doesn’t have the power to do that. Our enemies will NOT beat their swords into plowshares no matter how witlessly Obama unilaterally acts.

Obama never mentioned, I don’t believe, the utterly failed nuclear arms deal that the LAST Democrat president who betrayed America signed. And this “deal” is far worse than that abomination was.

This is a nation that deserves to utterly and miserably and agonizingly perish. Because it worships homosexual perversion on an altar of sixty million murdered babies – at least the parts of those babies that Democrat Abortion Arm Planned Parenthood couldn’t sell to the highest bidder.

We voted for our own destruction, and as Obama once arrogantly lectured Republicans, “elections have consequences.” And at the end of the day, Satan won.

So, okay, let me get this straight so far. It’s right to believe that religion that upholds humanity as created in the image of God is false. It’s right to believe that we are the vicious descendants of vicious animals. But it’s wrong for us to act like the vicious animals that we actually are if the evolution it’s so right for us to believe in is actually true.

Gosh, liberalism is hard. You either have to be entirely mindless or else your mind will explode due to all the ridiculous contradictions. And I find both options thoroughly unpleasant.

Anyway, the outcry over the death of Cecil the lion by the same people who yawn when Planned Parenthood is caught red-handed trafficking in the human body parts of the babies they murder (because, after all in liberal doublethink, just because they have human body parts they clearly can’t be “human” can they?) forced me to think just how wicked America has become.

Guru: A teacher of Hinduism, he is supposedly a manifestation of Brahman. Every Hindu must follow a guru to reach Self-realization.

Reincarnation: The process of being physically born again. Birth, death, re-birth. In the east, a curse, in the west desirable because they think that they can come back and sin some more.

Karma: There is no forgiveness in Hinduism–only karma. If you do wrong you will pay for it in the next life–this is working out your karma your punishment for sin. Each person MUST suffer for his sins. If someone is suffering in this life, it is assumed they are paying for some evil they’ve done in their past life– even though they don’t remember what they did wrong. That’s why they can walk by some low caste member who is dying on the street and feel nothing. Karma is the law of cause and effect which determines destiny/fate. For every thought, word or deed karma produces an inevitable effect. Karma necessitates reincarnation so you can pay for the sins you’ve done in your past life. Rabi once knocked over a Krishna idol (god) on the floor and wanted to say “Sorry” but he knew no apology would be accepted. The unchangeable law of karma forbade it. He would have to continue on the wheel of reincarnation. One transgression will keep you in the system. Reincarnation is a CURSE to the real Hindu. In the west, it makes people happy to think they can come back and sin some more. If that brass figure was god, why did it fall so easy? Why do Hindus have to carefully wrap their gods and put them up for safekeeping? Because they are no gods.

Caste: A cruel system supported by Krishna in the Gita–probably devised by the Aryan invaders of India in order to keep the darker skinned Dravidians they conquered in quiet subjection. The four castes are Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaisya, and Sudra. The doctrines of karma and reincarnation followed naturally, teaching that lower castes by accepting their lot in life could inprove in the next life. The Untouchables were below caste and thus outside the religous system of Hinduism. The God of the Bible, the true God, is no respecter of persons. Anyone who will repent and love the Lord will be saved.