Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

Re: Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

AC 18073150 ..... YOUR IN DREAM LAND !

AND, your reading comprehension =0 ! The rods are 4-5 stories IN THE AIR, ready to fall on the GROUND, NO WATER to cool same ... = Fire, explosions in about 8 hours, right NEXT TO 1000s of other fuel rods in 'CASKS' that will go TOO!

Re: Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

AC 18073150 ..... YOUR IN DREAM LAND !

AND, your reading comprehension =0 ! The rods are 4-5 stories IN THE AIR, ready to fall on the GROUND, NO WATER to cool same ... = Fire, explosions in about 8 hours, right NEXT TO 1000s of other fuel rods in 'CASKS' that will go TOO!

You'll be dead in less than a year, IF your LUCKY !

Quoting: THE Professor ! 24513996

you been saying that for over a year and a half now.Dont you get bored with it?

Re: Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

ENEWS!!! shit it must be true!!!

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25131536

Interview with Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to SwitzerlandEnglish-Chinese translation by AsianjijoPublished on Aug 3, 2012h/t onesizjk

Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland: Due to its ground has been sinking, Unit 4 is now endangered in collapse. [...] According to secretary of former Prime Minister Kan, the ground level of the building has been sinking 80 cm [31.5 inches] unevenly. Because the ground itself has the problem, whether the building can resist a quake bigger than M6 still remains a question.

Re: Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

ENEWS!!! shit it must be true!!!

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25131536

Interview with Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to SwitzerlandEnglish-Chinese translation by AsianjijoPublished on Aug 3, 2012h/t onesizjk

Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland: Due to its ground has been sinking, Unit 4 is now endangered in collapse. [...] According to secretary of former Prime Minister Kan, the ground level of the building has been sinking 80 cm [31.5 inches] unevenly. Because the ground itself has the problem, whether the building can resist a quake bigger than M6 still remains a question.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25008029

finger on the button eh?

a magnitude 6 would fuck most things up, dont need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.please feel free to research how many m6.0 quakes japan has had since March 11 and sleep easy tonight knowing you dont have to get off the planet just yet.

Re: Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

ENEWS!!! shit it must be true!!!

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25131536

Interview with Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to SwitzerlandEnglish-Chinese translation by AsianjijoPublished on Aug 3, 2012h/t onesizjk

Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland: Due to its ground has been sinking, Unit 4 is now endangered in collapse. [...] According to secretary of former Prime Minister Kan, the ground level of the building has been sinking 80 cm [31.5 inches] unevenly. Because the ground itself has the problem, whether the building can resist a quake bigger than M6 still remains a question.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25008029

finger on the button eh?

a magnitude 6 would fuck most things up, dont need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.please feel free to research how many m6.0 quakes japan has had since March 11 and sleep easy tonight knowing you dont have to get off the planet just yet.

Re: Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

AC 18073150 ..... YOUR IN DREAM LAND !

AND, your reading comprehension =0 ! The rods are 4-5 stories IN THE AIR, ready to fall on the GROUND, NO WATER to cool same ... = Fire, explosions in about 8 hours, right NEXT TO 1000s of other fuel rods in 'CASKS' that will go TOO!

You'll be dead in less than a year, IF your LUCKY !

Quoting: THE Professor ! 24513996

I am not AC from Japan but let us see what would happenin the case that Building would really collapse:The majority of the Fuel Rods would be still inside the Cask and inside the Pool,(The Pool itself is a own separate Part)because they are deep inside, 4 Meter, of a holding System(They are not freely floating inside of the Pool)

When the cooling Water is gone it would be refilledand the Cooling Circle Re-Established,when the Pool cant hold the Water they would spray the Rodswith a Borium/ Water Melange for 24 Hours Non Stopuntil the Rods get moved to the Common spend Fuel-Pool!

The Rods would not start anon to melt and burn,according to my knowledge this need Time, ca. 48 Hours.

This Time will expand with the spraying of Cooling Water.

The Tepco People even think (Dream?) that the Fuel Rodscan stand "outside" even for a long Time as long as theSpraying continue.Maybe this is possible but they will emit a lot ofRadiation!

In Theory every single Pool could collapse in a strong Earthquake!It is stupid to look only for F'Shima when we have Nuclear Reactors that cant even stand a Mag. 5,5!We need to switch them off, all of thembut we should start with the most weak and old ones!

Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit.

In 1967, Tepco chopped 25 meters off the 35-meter natural seawall where the reactors were to be located, according to documents filed at the time with Japanese authorities. That little-noticed action was taken to make it easier to ferry equipment to the site and pump seawater to the reactors. It was also seen as an efficient way to build the complex atop the solid base of bedrock needed to better protect the plant from earthquakes.

But the razing of the cliff also placed the reactors five meters below the level of 14- to 15-meter tsunami hitting the plant March 11, triggering a major nuclear disaster resulting in the meltdown of three reactor cores.

A former senior Tepco executive involved in the decision-making says there were two main reasons for removing the cliff. First, a lower escarpment made it easier to deliver heavy equipment used in the plant, such as the reactor vessels, turbines and diesel generators, all of which were transported to the site by sea. Second, the design of the plant required seawater to keep the reactor cool, which was facilitated by a shorter distance to the ocean.

Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit.

In 1967, Tepco chopped 25 meters off the 35-meter natural seawall where the reactors were to be located, according to documents filed at the time with Japanese authorities. That little-noticed action was taken to make it easier to ferry equipment to the site and pump seawater to the reactors. It was also seen as an efficient way to build the complex atop the solid base of bedrock needed to better protect the plant from earthquakes.

But the razing of the cliff also placed the reactors five meters below the level of 14- to 15-meter tsunami hitting the plant March 11, triggering a major nuclear disaster resulting in the meltdown of three reactor cores.

A former senior Tepco executive involved in the decision-making says there were two main reasons for removing the cliff. First, a lower escarpment made it easier to deliver heavy equipment used in the plant, such as the reactor vessels, turbines and diesel generators, all of which were transported to the site by sea. Second, the design of the plant required seawater to keep the reactor cool, which was facilitated by a shorter distance to the ocean.

Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit.

In 1967, Tepco chopped 25 meters off the 35-meter natural seawall where the reactors were to be located, according to documents filed at the time with Japanese authorities. That little-noticed action was taken to make it easier to ferry equipment to the site and pump seawater to the reactors. It was also seen as an efficient way to build the complex atop the solid base of bedrock needed to better protect the plant from earthquakes.

But the razing of the cliff also placed the reactors five meters below the level of 14- to 15-meter tsunami hitting the plant March 11, triggering a major nuclear disaster resulting in the meltdown of three reactor cores.

A former senior Tepco executive involved in the decision-making says there were two main reasons for removing the cliff. First, a lower escarpment made it easier to deliver heavy equipment used in the plant, such as the reactor vessels, turbines and diesel generators, all of which were transported to the site by sea. Second, the design of the plant required seawater to keep the reactor cool, which was facilitated by a shorter distance to the ocean.

Re: Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

One of the real bad thing is that this wholeFuel Rod Story happen/ed only because of us,the People who are toooooo critical and neveraccepted a final Storage Facility!

We need this Places now. ASAP.!

Or is there someone with better Ideas?

Quoting: the mighty Atom

Take a break from shilling you paid stooge. You are not credible. You jump all over Fukushima threads to diss the magnitude of the doom like a fat kid jumping on a Mars Bar or a Jap jumping on some free sushi.

Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit.

In 1967, Tepco chopped 25 meters off the 35-meter natural seawall where the reactors were to be located, according to documents filed at the time with Japanese authorities. That little-noticed action was taken to make it easier to ferry equipment to the site and pump seawater to the reactors. It was also seen as an efficient way to build the complex atop the solid base of bedrock needed to better protect the plant from earthquakes.

But the razing of the cliff also placed the reactors five meters below the level of 14- to 15-meter tsunami hitting the plant March 11, triggering a major nuclear disaster resulting in the meltdown of three reactor cores.

A former senior Tepco executive involved in the decision-making says there were two main reasons for removing the cliff. First, a lower escarpment made it easier to deliver heavy equipment used in the plant, such as the reactor vessels, turbines and diesel generators, all of which were transported to the site by sea. Second, the design of the plant required seawater to keep the reactor cool, which was facilitated by a shorter distance to the ocean.

Mud rocks, such as mudstone and shale comprise some 65% of all sedimentary rocks. Mudstone looks like hardened clay and, depending upon circumstances under which it was formed, it may show cracks or fissures, like a sun-baked clay deposit.

...

Quoting: Waterbug

Bedrock, not Mudstone!

Quoting: the mighty Atom

We doing this dance again..?

Quoting: Waterbug

Up to you!

Quoting: the mighty Atom

In order to build the plant - originally only Unit 1 - the upper sedimentary layers were excavated. These are Quaternary alluvial deposits composed of clay and sand which are friable or semi-hard (green and brown in the cross-section). Thus the plant was built on "mudrock" type sedimentary rock (yellow in the cross-section), which is a muddy rock composed of clay and silt (very fine sand). But the term "muddy" does not mean that the rock is soft. It simply means that it is a rock whose matrix is clay; it is also called "argillite".

Re: Ground Under Fukushima Unit 4 is Sinking — Now in danger of collapse!!!!

One of the real bad thing is that this wholeFuel Rod Story happen/ed only because of us,the People who are toooooo critical and neveraccepted a final Storage Facility!

We need this Places now. ASAP.!

Or is there someone with better Ideas?

Quoting: the mighty Atom

Take a break from shilling you paid stooge. You are not credible. You jump all over Fukushima threads to diss the magnitude of the doom like a fat kid jumping on a Mars Bar or a Jap jumping on some free sushi.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25059617

And you are a stupid and ignorant Canatard,your Food can show up to 1.000 Bq and you would stilleat it, the Uran is coming from your Country andyou think that i am shilling