Court strikes down virtual child porn law

WASHINGTON, April 16 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court Tuesday struck down a federal law outlawing "virtual" child pornography as "overbroad" and unconstitutional.

The law banned sexual images purporting to be of children, but produced without the use of children. Such images could include actors who appear to be children or may be completely computer generated without the use of real people.

Attorney General John Ashcroft said Tuesday the ruling will make enforcing anti-child pornography laws "immeasurably more difficult."

Ashcroft also said he has issued a directive to the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Justice Department's Criminal Division in response to the ruling.

The attorney general said he has ordered the section and the nation's U.S. attorney's offices to make sure ongoing child pornography cases do not run afoul of the ruling.

He has also given the section more leeway to begin child pornography prosecutions, Ashcroft said.

Tuesday's ruling was an almost complete defeat for the government.

The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 "does more than prohibit pandering (of child pornography)," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in the court's majority opinion. "It prohibits possession of material described, or pandered, as child pornography by someone earlier in the distribution chain. The provision prohibits a sexually explicit film containing no youthful actors, just because it is placed in a box suggesting a prohibited movie. Possession is a crime even when the possessor knows the movie was mislabeled. The First Amendment requires a more precise restriction. For this reason, (a key portion of the law) is substantially overbroad and in violation of the First Amendment."

Three justices dissented to part of the majority opinion.

In her dissent, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said computer-generated images of child pornography may become so sophisticated that it will be hard to tell "virtual" porn from the real thing.

O'Connor said she would have struck down the part of the law that bans material that "'conveys the impression' that it contains actual-child pornography, but uphold the ban on pornographic depictions that 'appear to be' of minors so long as it is not applied to youthful-adult pornography."

Justice Clarence Thomas joined in the majority's judgment, but wrote a separate opinion.

The case which brought Tuesday's ruling came from San Francisco and dealt in part with computer-generated images that may, or may not, involve real people.

Federal law has banned child pornography for decades. But changing technologies, particularly the advances in computer graphics and the Internet, moved Congress to change the law.

Originally, the law banned "visual depictions of real children engaged in sexually explicit conduct," the Justice Department told the Supreme Court in a brief.

In the 1996 Child Pornography Prevention Act, however, Congress amended the law to include images of a child who "appears to be" engaging in sexual conduct, or images that "convey the impression" of child sex, regardless of whether real children were involved in the production.

The 1996 act also listed 13 congressional "findings" to underpin the law, including these: That child pornography is used to seduce other children into sexual activity; that it is used to "whet the appetites" of pedophiles; and that advancing technology might make it impossible to distinguish between photographic and computer-generated images of children having sex.

After President Clinton signed the act into law, the Free Speech Coalition -- a trade association dealing in adult-oriented materials -- and other plaintiffs in Northern California challenged it in court.

A federal judge ruled that the law was constitutional in that it was not overbroad or too vague.

A federal appeals court panel reversed the judge, ruling that the "phrases 'appears to be' a minor,' and 'convey(s) the impression' that the depiction portrays a minor, are vague and overbroad" in the law "and thus do not meet the requirements of the First Amendment."

The Justice Department then asked the Supreme Court to intervene.

The justices heard argument in the case Oct. 30. Tuesday's ruling affirms the lower-court decision, striking down the federal law.

United Press International is a leading provider of news, photos and information to millions of readers around the globe via UPI.com and its licensing services.

With a history of reliable reporting dating back to 1907, today's UPI is a credible source for the most important stories of the day, continually updated - a one-stop site for U.S. and world news, as well as entertainment, trends, science, health and stunning photography. UPI also provides insightful reports on key topics of geopolitical importance, including energy and security.

A Spanish version of the site reaches millions of readers in Latin America and beyond.

UPI was founded in 1907 by E.W. Scripps as the United Press (UP). It became known as UPI after a merger with the International News Service in 1958, which was founded in 1909 by William Randolph Hearst. Today, UPI is owned by News World Communications.