Pages

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Melba Ketchum: We have not said that it has angel DNA

Robert Lindsay published an article over the weekend stating from a "source" that Ketchum's report references "Angel DNA". This has caused a number of people to come to Ketchum's defense. One person close to Ketchum, who says he "can't give the full statement" claims that "'Angelic...' was used as the code word for the DNA". On Team Tazer's Facebook page, Melody Knowles explains that "Angel DNA" is an old term used for unknown DNA.
"Melba is at least my age (old, older than her profile pic suggests!), and would be well familiar with that term. But RL pouncing on that terminology is going to lead some to pick up an alien/Nephilium connection. And some who sit behind the desks at the journals may also not be too familiar with it and have reservations as well as up and coming scientists that will be reading the paper. Best to take the term out of the paper and just use 'unknown' instead," she wrote.

It's not clear to anyone whether Ketchum's paper references the term "Angel" or not. To get to bottom of it, the blog Bizarre Zoology, wrote an email to Dr. Melba Ketchum asking her what the real deal is. The following is what she wrote:

"Thank you so much for emailing to ask these questions. While I cant answer everything until the release of the paper I will try to help where I can. In the paper you will find a explanation as to the great lengths Dr. Ketchum went to make sure no contamination was possible. There were more than three labs that the samples were sent to and yes they showed the same results. All the details on the entire research will be released with this paper. We did the press release due to a leak of information.,This was why we had no choice but to do the press release. The paper will be out hopefully in the next few weeks. We do not have a date yet but feel it is soon. We have not said that it has angel DNA . That was not said by anyone on our team , but someone else on the outside. That is very much a false rumor. I hope you are able to read the paper that will be coming out. I think it will put your mind at ease and give you the answers you desire."

Creatures could exhibit all or only some of these traits. We have stories litered through history of men or creatures with some or all of these traits. The conquestadors wrote about Giant Red haired, 6toed 6fingerd, blue eyed giants in South America. Plus legends from allover the world.

There is something nasty in the woodpile of hummanity!! No doubt!

Except for the last, --- doesn't really sound like an Angel now does it.

If this thing is from Cain, it is cursed, not an angel.

If there is something involved from an actual "Angel." IT WOULDN'T BE FROM A GOOD ANGEL ANYWAY.

If you want to look at it Bilically, This thing would be a DNA modified being done by the Fallen ANGELS.

WHAT DO YOU THINK WAS WALKING AROUND ON THIS EARTH THAT WAS SO EVIL, MEAN , AND NASTY THAT GOD SAID SCREW-IT, I'M STARTING OVER. WELL, TAKE A LOOK AT ALL THOSE NASTY, MURDEROSE CREATURES THEY HAD IN "MYTH" IN THE ANCIENT DAYS. NOW IF THOSE THINGS (DEMONIC) IN NATURE WERE RUNNING AROUND, WELL GOD WOULD NEED TO CLEAN HOUSE WOULDN'T HE?

I'm a Rush fan, and I talk to Jesus. Say hi to Him yourself, you may be surprised. Rag on me all you want. Atheists don't piss me off like they used to--I finally realized that they will remember the conversations they had with those of us who know Truth, and they will know that we were correct. Unfortunately for you, that will be the very, very least of your problems, and I pity you. And I don't care if you don't want my pity--you have it anyway and, sadly, one day you will understand why.

Yesterday I would have called her a fruitcake but after the bodies story from Lindsay today maybe she isn't so nutty as we're led to believe. Unless someone has told her to tone down the crazy a little or people won't take you seriously and this is some kind of damage control now the media have found the story?

Fair enough, but there are problems. How can you not know if the article will be out in the next few weeks or not? Journals are not newspapers, they publish monthly or bi-monthly or even less frequently and they tell you what edition your paper will be in well in advance. They send you copies of it as it will appear in the journal,too.

The most logical conclusion is that there's something very weird in the bigfoot DNA. Maybe not angels in the sense we see them portrayed, but in a certain sense, yeah. You cannot shoot down possibilities out of hand because you don't like how it sounds. It may just be the truth.

I think if you are logically minded and not a believer in the paranormal or religion it's easy to doubt there is real Angel DNA there. At best if there is anything there at all we just discovered a new spiecies of primate that's all wouldn't get those religious hopes up of real Angelic proof

Lindsey's article mentions specifically that Melba's early report did mention Nephilim. Go read it. If what was said there is true, there's no way she meant "angelic" as anything other than what it sounds like to us poor non-scientists.

There'll be no strings to bind your hands Not if my love can find your heart And there's no need to take a stand For it was I who choose to start I see no need to take me home I'm old enough to face the dawn

Just call me angel of the morning, angel Just touch my cheek before you leave me Oh my baby Just call me angel of the morning, angel Then slowly turn away from me

Maybe the sunlight will be dim But it won't matter anyhow If morning's echoes say we've sinned Then it was what I wanted now And if we're victims of the night I won't be blinded by the light

Oh my baby Just call me angel of the morning, angel Just touch my cheek before you leave me, baby Just call me angel of the morning Then slowly turn away from me

Just call me angel of the morning, angel Just touch my cheek before you leave me

Just call me angel of the morning, angel Just touch my cheek before you leave me, darling Just call me angel of the morning, angel Just touch my cheek before you leave me, darling Just call me angel of the morning, angel

If the "response" was written by her new PR person, she will be in deeper doo-doo real quick. The person doesn't use proper grammar or utilize correct sentence structure. This will make Melba look like she's not very smart.

Now they are outright lying with weasel words. It is a fact replicated in many phone conversations that reliable figures have had with Ketchum that she specifically mentioned the Nephilim, "something out of this world" in the DNA, and yes, the word "angel" in conjunction with these statements. In context, this interpretation is undeniable.

According to this statement, the peer review is OVER. The Ketchum paper has already been accepted and will be published. Am I reading this right? If so, that is the only thing that will clear any of this up. The above statement does not address the habitator dog food bagle-eating bigfoot-communicating stories. It does not tell us about the review process. It does not tell us how many more than three labs checked the samples. Most importantly, it does not give us a firm date after which we can call "bullshit" if it doesn't appear in print.Dr. Ketchum, this has disintegrated into a disappointing midway sideshow, with rumors of hoodoo voodoo and hidden corpses flying everywhere. The statements attributed to you suggest your paper is forthcoming and will stand on its own merits. Fair enough. But the rest has been evasive double-talk which makes it sound like another media stunt and a hoax.Has your report been vetted, was it accepted for publication, by whom, and on what date will it appear in the public domain? Clear answers to those questions would go a long way toward repairing the credibility of the project and putting it back in the realm of science -- where I think you'd agree it belongs.

Ketchum hasn't released shit. She's just made a lot of extremely weird claims. Claims that have been rejected by scientific journals, and will never be published except for profit in a package made to dupe believers.

I'm not making any remarks/claims or etc until the results/paper is published. Most of us understand the magnitude of this. If we are waiting weeks months later,,well,,yes I'll be a tad cranky. Despite personal differences,,,this study can tell the world one thing. We're not crazy,,,were not drunk,,were not mentally ill. These awesome beings are not figments of imagination,,like some of the tatertrolls love to chant. They are real.

That is a nonsense statement. They would be told what issue the article will appear in. What, you think you buy the journals weekly at a news stand hoping your work is published? Something is not right.

Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it's really informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the layout of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?