EB5NewsBlog.org by Artisan Business Group, Inc. - If you're developing an EB-5 Regional Center or ready to present your projects to Chinese emigration agencies, or want us to assist in evaluating project viability and marketability, please email us at artisanbusiness@yahoo.com. Let us supercharge your EB-5 capital-raising process!

Thursday, November 16, 2017

Job-creating EB-5 visa program sees numbers decline

(Source: San Francisco Examiner) The EB-5 program provides a pathway to legal permanent
residence to foreign nationals who create at least 10 new jobs by investing $1
million directly in a business or a Regional Center (an approved enterprise).
Alternatively, that amount drops by half ($500,00) if the investment is in a
targeted employment area (TEA) — an area that’s hurting on the jobs front. The
Regional Center program comes up for renewal every four years and is subject to
the sunset provision. Several legislators have demanded re-examination of TEAs,
adjusting the level of investments — accounting for inflation, and some have
even proposed the program’s elimination. Sen. Dianne Feinstein called it “U.S.
citizenship for sale” and argued the morality of giving preference to wealthy
investors over others who’ve faced significant challenges in their lives due to
persecution and poverty.

I do believe that it’s not one program over the other. Both
kinds of visa programs should co-exist. Our immigration portfolio must include
policies that clearly, overwhelmingly and immediately benefit our economy, too.
After all, the EB-5 program was started with job creation in mind, especially
in towns and cities that need stimulation. Rohit Kapuria, an associate at Saul Ewing Arnstein &
Lehr and an expert on EB-5s, who was named one of the top 5 EB-5 Rising Stars
by EB5 Investors Magazine in 2016, calls the program “crucial financing”
and firmly believes that EB-5s are effective.

“The number of jobs that are created and the amount of
capital deployment that has occurred because of EB-5 is significant,” he said.

An Invest in the USA (IIUSA) study of U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) data on EB-5s for 2016 shows a $6.67 billion
investment in our economy from this one immigration program. “So, but for EB-5s, the large number of projects that we
work on wouldn’t be completed,” Kapuria said. The tricky and somewhat muddled aspect of EB-5s is how China
has dominated the EB-5 narrative. IIUSA analysis shows that China captured 82.5
percent of EB-5 specific visas, with 10,948 I-526 filings. In contrast, Vietnam
and India, second- and third-highest on the list, filed 404 and 354
applications, respectively, yielding a combined 5.7 percent. “I actually represent a well-known regional center in San
Francisco called Golden Gate Global,” Kapuria said. “They’ve done the Shipyards
deal, they’ve done the Sacramento Kings deal, they’ve done Brooklyn Basin and
they have a very heavy China focus.”

From his own experience, Kapuria believes that a part of
China’s domination is due to brand name build-up “There’s actually one [project] in downtown San Francisco,
which was a $350 million twin office building that I worked on,” he said. “The
brand name of the Chinese company that then JV’ed [joint venture] with the U.S.
company was able to help in attracting EB-5 capital. So roughly around $35
million of EB-5 capital went into that project." Since 1990, when the program was first created, China has
consistently been ahead of other countries in EB-5 visas. Because the annual
limit was set at 10,000 visas and it was ruled that no single country could use
more than 7.1 percent of the available visas, it was also allowed that if no
other country made it to its 7.1 percent per-country limit, the differential
from every country then could be added to a single country. Other than China,
no other country has reached that target as yet. But this has also resulted in a very severe backlog for
China.

“From the time an investor in mainland China invests in a
project, ’til the time that they get a permanent 10-year green card — not the
temporary green card — you’re looking at probably a 12- to 13-year wait,”
Kapuria said. One reason for this severe backlog is in the interpretation
of the visa limit. Is it 10,000 EB-5 visas or 10,000 visas issued due to EB-5
approval, which includes immediate family? “The state department has been interpreting the 10,000 limit
as being investors and investors’ immediate family, which is [a] spouse and any
child under 21,” Kapuria explained. “So when you account for total number of
investors, you’re looking at approximately 3,500 investors total.”

This is an extremely short-sighted interpretation. If the
original intent of the EB-5 was job creation, then shouldn’t we be assured of
10,000 times 10, or 100,000 jobs every year, instead of 35,000 jobs? It seems
ludicrous that we’d undercut our own benefits. Kapuria hopes that Congress
might take a second look at the original intent of the program.

“Part of the legislative push is whether Congress would be
willing to clarify that intent and make it prospective,” he added. Due to the backlog, it stands to reason that the appetite
for EB-5 visas in China is declining, according to Kapuria, and the numbers do
reflect this. There has been a 17 percent overall decline in the number of EB-5
filings since 2015, and a 19 percent decline for China, in particular. A decline in EB-5 applications is also a degradation of
confidence in America’s robust economy. Let’s hope Congress is able to
reconcile some of the issues with the EB-5 program before December. Isn’t job
growth one of the promises this administration made?