PanopticonUK

Tired of the authorities intruding into our lives, they have forgotten that THEY are supposed to serve US.
We are the people the country belongs to and they have been put in place to administer it on our behalf, spending OUR MONEY and affecting OUR LIVES.

This doesn't specify what exactly will be done but it is widely expected to require every communications service provider to retain records of every web page you visit, every email you send, basically a log of everything you do online!

I thought we had seen the turn around of the police state, now it looks like we were lied to through the teeth of the smarmy faced politicians who asked us to vote for them.

Is this down to the will of the REAL rulers of this country? The people pulling the strings behind the scenes at the European parliament who have supremacy over our own elected politicians!

Cameron and Clegg - Do you have the balls to stand up and represent this country? or are you going to quietly become the puppets of our european overlords?

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

I had been looking forward to a quiet time with Tory/libdem promises to roll back state intrusion, I foolishly believed that we were entering a period when the politicians had recognised that government had exploded out of control during the Labour years.

The politicians still haven't remembered that PARENTS are responsible for their children and teachers only have the authority of the parents to discipline students during times that the parents have delegated that responsibility such as during school hours or school events.

This government is continuing along the path of the previous incumbents, trying to establish the state as parent of first resort!

I choose to state that I am responsible for my children until they reach the age of maturity and can take responsibility for themselves. Until then the state ONLY has the responsibility and authority to step in if I am failing my responsibility so badly that my children are at risk of harm.

Get on with the job of running this country for the good of the population and GET OUT of my private life and the private lives of my children! You've already trashed the country; you WILL NOT trash the lives of my children.

Saturday, 27 February 2010

Ed and his lapdog Graham Badman have concocted a report consisting mainly of unfounded allegations and misrepresented statistics. This report seeks to put the authorities in the position of having prime responsibility for children, over and above the parents. They claim that parents cannot be trusted to look after their children and therefore it is necessary for all children to be seen by an approved professional on a regular basis.....Are these the kind of professionals they want us to hand our children over to in order to certify that WE are not abusing them:-

The report by the charity commission "Charities Back on Track 2008/9" states that of the 34 cases investigated and closed "Cases included concerns where individuals on the Sex Offenders Register were either proposed, or were acting, as trustees."

These are only the convicted offenders, we do not know how many people actually work for charities and may be in positions of power over children and other vulnerable people. Let's face it - how many reports have we read of children in care being abused, raped or even murdered by those in charge of them? How many other vulnerable people are harmed by those in power over them?

I used to live near an old peoples home and could often hear the anguished calls of the residents when they were too much trouble for the staff to bother to bring them their food or help them to the toilet!

This is why we must not delegate to the state the care of those we love. Children, the elderly, the mentally infirm are best cared for by those that love them, either personally or by staff that we choose (and check up on).

Positions of power will always be sought by those seeking power for their own ends, positions of power over children will always attract paedophiles. Do you think the state REALLY cares for your child more than you do? Do you trust the judges, the NSPCC staff, child protection officer, even the nursery worker?

There is a need for professionals to help families when they need it, but they should be carefully restrained, behave above reproach and always in the best interest of the family instead of striving to meet tickbox targets!

Thursday, 22 October 2009

Watching the various activities of our politicians, social services and the many others who claim to be 'protecting' our children, I've often wondered whether there is actually a ring of paedophiles at high level in authority and government.

Some time back I was shown a translation of a German Gov't leaflet advocating that fathers should 'pay particular attention to the vulva and clitoris of their young daughters', that touching children sexualy was 'good'. Naturally enough, the original leaflet has long since disappeared from official sites after the outrage by parents across the world.

Now I have seen a report by UNESCO which (amongst other things) says that children as young as 5 should be taught about masturbation!

I've always advocated that childrens' questions about sex should be answered honestly and openly so that children know that they can freely ask about any matter but this is VERY different to being 'taught' about sex, especially at such a young age!!

If any government official tries to force me to teach sex to any of my children before they are ready to ask questions driven by their own curiosity they may find the UNESCO report shoved where the sun don't shine.

Quotes

Place the lives of children in their formative years, despite the convictions of their parents, under the intimate control of experts appointed by the state, force them to attend schools where the higher aspirations of humanity are crushed out, and where the mind is filled with the materialism of the day, and it is difficult to see how even the remnants of liberty can subsist.

. . . the same tendency exhibits itself today even in those communities where the name of socialism is most abhorred. When once the majority has determined that a certain regime is beneficial, that regime without further hesitation is forced ruthlessly upon the individual man. It never seems to occur to modern legislatures that although “welfare” is good, forced welfare may be bad . . . . in the interests of physical well-being the great principles of liberty are being thrown ruthlessly to the winds.

(J. Gresham Machen - christianity and liberalism)

"The best way to take control over a people and control them utterly is to take a little of their freedom at a time, to erode rights by a thousand tiny and almost imperceptible reductions. In this way the people will not see those rights and freedoms being removed until past the point at which these changes cannot be reversed."Adolf Hitler

First they came for the Jewsand I did not speak outbecause I was not a Jew.Then they came for the Communistsand I did not speak outbecause I was not a Communist.Then they came for the trade unionistsand I did not speak outbecause I was not a trade unionist.Then they came for meand there was no one leftto speak out for me.

“Children will not remember you for the material things you provided but for the feeling that you cherished them.” –Richard L. Evans

“Where did we ever get the crazy idea that in order to make children do better, first we have to make them feel worse? Think of the last time you felt humiliated or treated unfairly. Did you feel like cooperating or doing better?” –Jane Nelson

“Trusting children with books is a revolutionary act. Books are, after all, dangerous stuff. Leave a child alone with a book and you don’t know what might happen.” — Susan Ohanian

In a free society, the rights and laws protect the individual from the government.

In a dictatorship, the rights and laws protect the government from the people.

Some permanent links and longer quotes

Food for thought from Philip Pullman*******************************************The Childrens' Story*******************************************“The sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinion of others, to do so would be wise, or even right...The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns him, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.” - John Stuart Mill***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************