The popular notion around here that Serena Williams peak season was her 2002 season is simply fallacious, if only because at the end of 2002 she only had a total of 4 of her 15 Grand Slam titles so far, while winning 3 Slams in 2002 alone. And therefore, we are left to believe that in her non-peak form Serena won 12 Grand Slam titles. LOL!

Moreover, the labeling of peak Serena is misnomer. The following record begs the question-what is the effect of injuries on peak Serena (when ever that was)?:

2003 - Underwent left knee surgery on August 1 to repair a partial tear, withdrawing from all events after Wimbledon (incl. US Open, Tour Championships).

*[Had professional Psychological attention to deal with the 2003 murder of her oldest sister, finally came to terms with that tragedy by the time to the 2007 Australian Open, at which time she dedicated her win then to her late sister in her winners speech].

2004 - Returned to Tour after eight-month lay-off due to knee rehabilitation and had fourth straight Top 10 finish. San Diego (withdrew w/left knee inflammation). Charleston (withdrew prior to 3r w/left knee inflammation). Withdrew from Australian Open w/left knee rehabilitation.

2006 - Nearly finished outside Top 100 for first time after injury-plagued season; fell 3r at Australian Open (l. to Hantuchova) then withdrew from all events until summer w/left knee injury (incl. Roland Garros, Wimbledon); on April 10, ranked outside Top 100 for first time since November 16, 1997; on July 10, fell to No.140 (down from No.11 at start of 2006); ended six-month layoff with three summer events, reaching SF at Cincinnati (l. to Zvonareva), SF at Los Angeles (l. to Jankovic; returned to Top 100 afterwards, having spent 18 weeks outside) and 4r at US Open (as WC, l. to No.1 Mauresmo in 3s); played only four events all year, lowest in Top 100 (next-lowest was V.Williams with six).

Perhaps, peak Serena should refers to a particular match or matches rather than a particular season or seasons.

Furthermore, peak Anybody vs. peak Serena is an oxymoron. Peak Serena is obviously Serena at her very best. As such, peak Serena is virtually unbeatable, and therefore, incomparable. Serena Williams at her best is actually the best female tennis performer in the history of the sport-the best female tennis player ever. And, for those who disagree having ever seen Serena Williams at her best, e.g., the 2012 Olympics, you can keep on not believing your lying eyes for the masturbation of your mind.

Finally, peak or no peak, Serena Williams has at some point in her career put in a peak performance (where her Opponent wins no more than five games in the match) against the very best of her competitors as follows:

The popular notion around here that Serena Williams peak season was her 2002 season is simply fallacious, if only because at the end of 2002 she only had a total of 4 of her 15 Grand Slam titles so far

In which other season did Serena win three Slams and go undefeated in Grand Slams? I seem to have missed it, despite hanging on her every match for the past 10 years.

Of course 2002 was her peak and any Serena fan who claims otherwise is doing her exploits and game throughout that entire year a disservice. That's the form that she largely managed to replicate the next year and carried Serena to winning 5/6 slams and 4 in a row. No form Serena has produced since has come close to eclipsing those achievements. Even in 2012 with a less potent field.

You seem to be claiming that the "Serena Slam" wasn't her playing peak simply because she has won many more slams since then. Aside from the fact her slam hit rate in both 2002 and 2003 is higher than anything else since - 2002 (along with arguably 2003) is the only year when Serena's game has looked equally as deadly at the French Open as all the other slams. That was a pure form of domination which we haven't seen since, from anyone.

In which other season did Serena win three Slams and go undefeated in Grand Slams? I seem to have missed it, despite hanging on her every match for the past 10 years.

Of course 2002 was her peak and any Serena fan who claims otherwise is doing her exploits and game throughout that entire year a disservice. That's the form that she largely managed to replicate the next year and carried Serena to winning 5/6 slams and 4 in a row. No form Serena has produced since has come close to eclipsing those achievements. Even in 2012 with a less potent field.

You seem to be claiming that the "Serena Slam" wasn't her playing peak simply because she has won many more slams since then. Aside from the fact her slam hit rate in both 2002 and 2003 is higher than anything else since - 2002 (along with arguably 2003) is the only year when Serena's game has looked equally as deadly at the French Open as all the other slams. That was a pure form of domination which we haven't seen since, from anyone.

In which other season did Serena win three Slams and go undefeated in Grand Slams? I seem to have missed it, despite hanging on her every match for the past 10 years.

Of course 2002 was her peak and any Serena fan who claims otherwise is doing her exploits and game throughout that entire year a disservice. That's the form that she largely managed to replicate the next year and carried Serena to winning 5/6 slams and 4 in a row. No form Serena has produced since has come close to eclipsing those achievements. Even in 2012 with a less potent field.

You seem to be claiming that the "Serena Slam" wasn't her playing peak simply because she has won many more slams since then. Aside from the fact her slam hit rate in both 2002 and 2003 is higher than anything else since - 2002 (along with arguably 2003) is the only year when Serena's game has looked equally as deadly at the French Open as all the other slams. That was a pure form of domination which we haven't seen since, from anyone.

Your response is even more irrational(you probably misunderstood my point) than the original notion that Serena Williams peaked in 2002.

First, I am not in any way arguing against the greatness of Serena 2002 season, because from my way of thinking the 2002 season coupled with 2003 Australian Open is the singular feat that puts Serena Williams in Legendary status. Rather, I am arguing against the "peak" concept been put to any particular season of hers. The peak concept implies the reaching of the pinnacle and then a fallen away with diminishing returns resulting from the application of the same factors/game. It is my contention that Serena Williams game came of age in by the time of the beginning of the 1999 tennis season-whereby Serena Williams demonstratively indicates she has the very tools in her tennis toolbox set to be a great champion. It is my contention that the Serena Williams game of 1999-2001 was of no difference to the Serena Williams game of 2002. That is, she was not serving any better, she was not returning any better, she was not moving any better, etc, in 2002. If anyone think otherwise they are clearly suffering from an illusion.

However, it was Serena Williams who in her own words opined in 2001 that in her mind professional tennis is proportionally 20% physical and 80% mental. It is imperative that the Serena fans hold on to that frame of thought because it will go far to help in the understanding of her ability to succeed even against most every odds. In tennis fandom too much attention is given solely to the 20% physicality of her game. (As a side note, this why so many here have not yet realize that barring serious injuries, Angelique Kerber is most likely to be the next great champion on the WTA tour, for in her game she possesses right proportion of the physicality and mentality of a champion).

Secondly, if we are to give consideration to the concept of peak as it relates to Serena Williams, it is imperative that we look at her whole tennis career successes as measured against her enormous talent. That Serena Williams is the most talented female tennis player ever to play the sport is not even up for debate anyone among those who rational and logical minded. As such, success came to her more easily than perhaps she herself had expected. I hereby insist that Serena Williams up to the time of the 2001 Canadian Open relied overly heavy on just her talent to succeed in the sport because success came relatively easy for her. For example, Serena first two main years (Rookie Years) on the WTA tour 1998 – 1999. At the end of the 1999 tennis season Serena competed in a total of 25 tournaments main draw tournaments on the WTA tour. In that experience she won 5 titles, including her first Grand Slam title, and she was 21 – 12 = 64% successful in Win/Loss percentage against the WTA Top 10, including a record for the fastest wins against top 10 ranked players and a record as to the fastest player to top 10 ranking status. Moreover, Serena success against the Tour’s three best players at the time: - #1 Hingis, #2 Davenport, and the GOAT Graf is an indicator of degree of her talent. In the same period Serena was 3 – 3 against #1 Hingis, 4 – 1 against #2 Davenport, and 1 – 1 against Graf. And so, for the first in the history of the rankings you have a situation in which the three best players on tour do not have a winning record against a rookie player who they have all matched up against.

Furthermore, after when Serena was so successful in the 1999 season many on the tour began to adjust to her game, while she was still solely relying on her talent to get by [Michael Vick speaks to this syndrome by which he also in the early part of his football career relied overly heavy on his enormous talent rather than enhancing it by the application of a proper study of game of football as a Quarterback]. Additionally, Serena Williams was at a different place mentally between the 2000 season and up to August of 2001. At one time her mother, Oracene, refers to her in that time as "my problem child". Serena was blowing matches she should have won if only she was mentally stronger then. For example, the 2000 Canadian Open vs. Martina Hingis, the 2001 Australian Open vs Martina Hingis, the 2001 Wimbledon vs. Jennifer Capriati, and the 2001 Los Angeles vs. Monica Seles (blowing 6 match points).

Thirdly, when Serena channels her mental strength at an 80% proportion she is at her very best level of performance. It was Chris Evert who recognized and wrote by the time of the 2000 season that "a fully thinking Serena Williams is unbeatable". After Jennifer Capriati became Serena Williams's big nemesis (losing four straight matches to Capriati), after mediocre successes since the end of the 1999 season, after hearing the chimes of the skeptics that she is just a One-Slam Wonder, after after blowing 6 match points in Los Angeles against Seles, Serena went into the 2001 Canadian Open and interview with Pam Shriver said,"I am tired of losing to girls who I know I am better than. I am tired of seeing girls who can't beat me ranked above me. I want to raise my ranking higher, and I want to help Venus becomes Number 1". With that, all she did was to forcibly brings her game back to the 80% mental strength proportion. And the rest as they say, is history. She went on the win 8 straight matches against Capriati by time of the 2003 Wimbledon; the Serena Slam; 5 of 6 Grand Slam titles in 2002 - 2003. Peak? Yes! But, my question is this: when has it diminished since then? Was it peak Serena who in spite being rusty, won the 2005 Australian Open? Was it peak Serena, who in spite of less than 100% conditioning and very rusty, won the 2007 Australian Open by beating a record number of seeded players and finishes in the Finals in pristine form?

Lastly, Serena in her 15 years on the WTA tour has only played in all four Grand Slams tournaments in single year five times. In those five years she won just 6 of her 15 Grand Slam titles:

Again, I summarized by asking the questions:
1. Since the 2002 season what has been the effects of injuries on the Serena Williams tennis career?
2. How has the injury factor affects what is consider her peak?
3. Where is the rise of the Serena Williams game in 2002 over the game she had in the 1999 season?
4. And, where fall off or diminishing of the Serena Williams game since the time of 2002 season?

Anyone who writes so much on an online tennis forum about one player and isn't PAID for it needs to go outside some more.

__________________I always wanted to be somebody. If I made it, it's half because I was game enough to take a lot of punishment along the way and half because there were a lot of people who cared enough to help me.
-Althea Gibson

Quote:

Originally Posted by darrinbaker00

When will you learn that "pushers" never make it past the club level, let alone #1 on the WTA computer? Will it be too late?

Did you see the Henin 2008 Miami match? Justine hit 30+ errors in 14 games.

Also, SMH at including Ivanovic, Safina and Wozniacki in that list.

Oh damn, there is a second long post? If I were Serena I'd get a restraining order.

__________________A single flow'r he sent me, since we met./All tenderly his messenger he chose;
Deep-hearted, pure, with scented dew still wet - One perfect rose.I knew the language of the floweret;/'My fragile leaves,' it said, 'his heart enclose.'
Love long has taken for his amulet/One perfect rose.Why is it no one ever sent me yet/One perfect limousine, do you suppose?
Ah no, it's always just my luck to get/One perfect rose.