Commentary:
Whether operability of the pistol or revolver is a requirement of the
offense depends on whether the offense applies the definition in § 53a-3
(18) or § 29-27. The definition in § 29-27 has been held not to
incorporate the definition of "firearm" from § 53a-3 (19) and therefore
not to require operability. State v. Delossantos, 211 Conn. 258,
273-75, cert. denied, 493 U.S. 866, 110 S.Ct. 188, 107 L.Ed.2d 142
(1989). This rationale was applied in State v. Banks, 59 Conn.
App. 112, 130-31, cert. denied, 254 Conn. 950 (2000), to find that
operability is not an element of § 53a-217c because that statute
specifically refers to the definition of "pistol or revolver" in §
29-27. See also State v. Slade, 97 Conn. App. 404, 410 n.6,
cert. denied, 280 Conn. 931 (2006) (neither § 29-35 (a), § 29-38 (a), or
§ 53a-217c have operability as an element); State v. Bradley, 39
Conn. App. 82, 90 (1995), cert. denied, 236 Conn. 901 (1996)
(operability is not an element of § 29-38, but is an element of §
53a-217); State v. Carpenter, 19 Conn. App. 48, 59, cert. denied,
213 Conn. 804 (1989) (operability is an element of § 53a-212 and §
53a-217). See glossary entry for "firearm."