Friday, June 3, 2016

The Second Vatican Council interpreted with Feeneyism changes the discussion on Vatican Council II.Ask the CDF / Ecclesia Dei to affirm the Second Vatican Council (Feeneyite version).Please do not assume hypothetical cases are explicit i.e objectively visible.Clarify that this mistake in reasoning is there throughout Vatican II.It is an error- theme.

OTHER RELIGIONS

Catholic religious communities, social organisations and political parties could announce that all non-Christians are on the road to Hell, without 'faith and baptism' in the Catholic Church .This is the message of the Second Vatican Council and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus .This is not a private opinion. This is a magisterial teaching in accord with Church documents, Tradition (the Council of Trent and the Councils before Trent) and Sacred Scripture.

This is not the teaching of cardinals and bishops of the present magisterium.The present magisterium is a break with the Magisterium of the last 2000 centuries.

__________________________

ECUMENISM / CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS

I would proclaim that all non-Christians are on the road to Hell, without Catholic Faith according to Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Orthodox Christians, Protestants and Pentecostals need to formally convert into the Catholic Church to avoid the flames Hell. This is the official teaching of the Second Vatican Council (AG 7, LG 14 - everyone needs faith for salvation.This refers to the Catholic Faith).It is also the de fide teaching of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441.Also in The Diary of St Faustina Kowalska, Jesus refers to heretics and schismatics. Jesus asks us to pray for 'heretics and schismatics' in the Novena of Divine Mercy.

_____________________

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

Since there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church everyone needs to formally enter the Church.They need to enter and stay in this Church to avoid the fires of Hell.

Christ must be accepted as King and the center for all policy legislation.The Constitution of a state must not be separated from the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church.There is no separation between the Church and Jesus and the Church and State.

In contrast a secular state is a state of Satan.God as known in the Catholic Church, is not there at the centre.Today we can see the fruits of the secular state: abortion, gay rights, atheism, pornography, euthanasia, invasion of immigrants with the approval of George Soros and others, to destroy the present form of Christianity in the West and the world.

________________________

LITURGY

I could announce that, since there is no salvation outside the Church there is no change in the traditional ecclesiology, of Holy Mass.The Tridentine Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass has the same old ecclesiology.It is based on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as intrerpreted by the 16th century missionaries.

The ecclesiology of the Mass today however is not the same as it was in pre Vatican Council II times, before the Council of Trent.

__________________________

NICENE CREED

I could proclaim that there are not three known baptisms. There are no three physically visible baptisms. There is one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.It is the baptism of water.There are no known cases of the baptism of desire or blood, without the baptism of water.

The baptism of water is not hypothetical but is physically visible. We can repeat it.In faith we understand the effects of the baptism of water. In faith we cannot say that we know the effects of the baptism of desire or blood without the baptism of water,de facto.Since we do not know of any case of the baptism of desire or blood without the baptism of water. If there was such a person he or she would have been known only to God. So the baptism of desire and blood, without the baptism of water, is not relevant to the centuries old teaching of this dogma on all needing to convert into the Church.The dogma says the baptism of water is necessary for salvation for everyone in the Catholic Church.So the baptism of desire is not an exception or even relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

_______________________

SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL

I proclaim that the Second Vatican Council is traditional on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.The Second Vatican Council supports the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is the interpretation of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston and the 16th century missionaries.Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8 Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2 etc. refer to hypothetical cases.So they are not objective exceptions to the dogma which indicates all need to be card carrying members of the Church with no exception.

___________________

EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

Catholics could announce that there are no known exceptions to the dogma ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century. No one in the past could physically see or know of an exception. No one in the present times knows of an exception to the dogma which says every one needs to formally enter the Church to avoid the fires of Hell.The baptism of desire or being saved in ignorance invincible refer to hypothetical cases. Hypothetical cases cannot be an exception in 2016 to the de fide teaching on the need for everyone to enter the Catholic Church, to be saved from Hell.

What I write here is what I believe as a Catholic and proclaim as a Catholic.This is what I believe as a Catholic based on magisterial documents up to the papacy of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI.Other Catholics could do the same as me.

The present magisterium, in 2016, is rejecting Vatican Council II.Since Vatican Council II is being interpreted with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism as a theology. Thus the Council becomes a break with Catholic Tradition.It is a rupture in particular with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feenyite).

If instead Vatican II is interpreted with Feeneyism i.e there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, then the Council would be traditional.There would be no need to reject it.

As expected there is no clarification or denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) or the Vatican Press Office regarding these blog posts(eucharistandmission). Vatican II was not really a problem. They have been faking it.It never was a problem. The CDF / Ecclesia Dei wanted us to compromise with error. Since the political Left, the one world religion people, is forcing the Vatican to interpret the Second Vatican Council, with an irrational inference and conclusion.Then the Council becomes a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).This hermeneutic of discontinuity is approved by Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis.

ERROR DISCOVERED

The error is there in the Letter of the Holy Office.From the second part of the Letter it has spread to Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. In the Letter, relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney, the Vatican has assumed hypothetical cases were explicity i.e objectively visible.This error in reasoning has been placed throughout the Second Vatican Council (LG 16 LG 8, UR 3, NO 2 etc.).So the Second Vatican Council is no longer a problem.Since we know the factual error in the Letter is relatived to the same mistake in the Second Vatican Council.If we read the Council, assuming hypothetical cases are not hypothetical, the interpretation of Vatican II changes. How can it be possible for hypothetical cases to be known in reality, practically? Things visible are invisible?

Without this contradiction, the Second Vatican Council is in agreement with the centuries old interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( the Feeneyite version). Then there will be no exceptions to the old ecclesiology. This signifies for me,that there is no change in the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.All non-Catholics must convert formally enter the Church to avoid the fires of Hell.This is the teaching of the Catholic Church, in Vatican Council II , the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, interpreted without any confusion between what is visible and invisible, objective and subjective.

I reject the Second Vatican Council interpreted with Cushingism; with an irrational premise and inference.So I would ask the contemporary magisterium, to stop interpreting the Second Vatican Council with Cushingism, which is irrational, non-traditional and heretical.

Cushingism cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit because the Holy Spirit can not make an objective error.The Holy Spirit also cannot contradict the magisterium of the Church before the Council of Trent.

VATICAN MUST CLARIFY

The Second Vatican Council interpreted wtih Feeneyism changes the discussion on the Council.I would ask the CDF/Ecclesia Dei to please affirm the Second Vatican Council (Feeneyite version).Please do not assume hypothetical cases are explicit i.e objectively visibile.Clarify that this mistake in reasoning is there throughout Vatican Council II.It is an error-theme.-Lionel Andrades