The Question of Seminary

Recently, I was asked if I thought that my seminary training was helpful or a waste of time. It is a good question and I wish there was a simple answer. However, like all things that involve people there is no simple answer. The value of my own seminary experience is an interplay of both positive and negative. At times, it was a waste; and yet over time it remains extremely valuable.

When it comes to the mechanics of emergent (postmodern) ministry, the answer is that my seminary training was definitely lacking. My theological education and prior ministry experience left me feeling like I was being trained to be a CEO of corporation we call church. I'm often reminded of an anonymous quote from a Japanese businessman. "When I meet a Buddhist monk, I meet a Holy Man. When I meet a Christian pastor, I meet a manager." My heart's desire is to be a Holy Man.

In my opinion, all seminaries are not equal. My choice of school was highly beneficial to my social context. I chose Regent, because I could specialize in the interaction of Christianity and culture. Regent College (the self-proclaimed "un-seminary") takes seriously the education, nurturing and equipping of the laity-the whole people of God-to live and work as servant leaders in vocations within the home, the marketplace, and the church. Regent was the closest fit to my experience and ideals as a vocational minister. I probably embodied the Regent ideal long before I ever considered studying there.

When it comes to the historical and exegetical understanding of the
Christian mind, my experience at Regent prepared me well. It gave me
the necessary foundation to catch a view beyond the modern church and
engage our changing culture from a Biblical mindset. Therefore the
emphasis on theological, historical, cultural, vocational, and Biblical
training is proving to be invaluable.

One of the many criticisms of the emerging church has been its
perceived lack of a solid theological engagement and understanding. My
theological education has filtered deeply into my life and service to
Christ (ministry). It has helped me develop an understanding of the
Christian mind as it is expressed throughout western history.

Many people may adopt an "emerging church style" yet reject
historical Christian practice in a faddish attempt to be current and
socially accepted by their peers. However, a strong foundation in
theology allows us to reinterpret the symbolic modes of thought and
action for our emerging social context. Those of us who move beyond the
thin veneer of style can bring a depth to our practice we would
otherwise lack. It is this search for depth that indicates a church
that is emerging beyond our cultural trends.

Seminary does not fully prepare you to pastor; even in an
institutional, modernist, emerging, house or corporate church. It is
not intended to. Rather, theological education supplies you with many
of the tools that are necessary to fulfill the mission and calling that
God has given you. As someone who has been a pastor in large and small
churches before going to seminary, I can guarantee you that experience
is the only way to learn how to pastor.

Like the mechanic with a well-equipped shop, pastors must have a
full range of tools to draw from. Yet a well-equipped shop is of no
value to a mechanic who does not know how and when to use his tools.
The real value of his tools is found in knowing what to do with them.
That practical knowledge only comes through hands on experience.
Pastoring is no different.

In short, I would not be the person I am today without the tools,
thought and reflection that my seminary training has afforded me. Yes,
I spent a lot of time in the educational system but I also continued to
minister in the emerging social context during that time. My education
was not an end in itself. It simply provided tools that I use to build
upon daily, nothing more and nothing less. Finding the balance between
knowledge and experience is the hard part.

If you were to ask me, "Is our current seminary system the best way
to gain a solid understanding of historic Christianity, Biblical faith,
accurate exegesis, and what it means to live as a Christian in the world?" I would have to say unequivocally, "NO." But that does not
diminish the necessity of a strong Biblical foundation nor the value of
theological training.

Rather than attend a traditional seminary, I'd prefer the
"Apprenticeship" idea. Combine strong practical living with firm
teaching, theological training and first hand experience. In essence,
becoming someone's disciple for a period of years while living life
with him or her. I'm thinking of something like a mini-monastic
community but one that engages the world rather than retreats from it.

The question of Seminary comes from how we view the Church. Is
Church something we do? If Church is an activity we do, then we can
expect seminaries to train the most professional managers of that
activity that money can buy. Is the Church who we are? If the Church is
who we are, then out our being flows what we do - ministry and service.
The only way to be the church is to be rooted deeply in God, to be led
by His Holy Spirit, and about His work daily. You cannot fully teach
this in a book or learn about it in a seminary, it must be experienced
and lived, as we become Holy Men.

Learning how to pastor in an emerging context is difficult because
the path is largely untried and undocumented. There are few rules and
very few guides. There are even fewer mentors available to
us. We must rely completely on the Spirit of God to guide and direct us as we seek to live as Christ-Followers in the world.

I know that this is a long response to a rather complex question but i hope it may prove helpful.

Comments

Darren,
This is an excellent, thoughtful, thorough, and well reasoned post. (I guess your seminary training DID do you some good. ;) Ha!) Seriously though, I think you have said some valuable things here, and I'll be thinking about them. I am glad to see this post see the light of day. I remember we corresponded about these things a couple of months ago, so this one seems to have been brewing for awhile. It aged well. ;)

Good thoughts man. I agree that the seminary experience should offer more, and a complete remodeling would serve us all well. There has been buzz about some schools, or changes in seminaries starting soon reflecting some of this. Do you have any solid info on this?

Well said. The current trend in seminary education to cohort based programs is a step in the right direction. The accountability and sharing within the group greatly inhances the retention of information and the successful application of it.

Hello, I wandered in from Blog Explosion and started reading your post on Seminary. As I am in seminary, it was right up my alley. Low and behold, a Regent grad! I am starting my second term here at Regent heading for a MCS with a focus in Theology. Great read and you actually sound like I Regent student!

I have been really impressed with Regent so far. I don't have any experience with other seminaries, but I like they atmosphere here as well as their views on the "laity." I won't be going into The Ministry (but, of course, will be in ministry regardless of what my occupation is) and Regent has been a great "cultivating" environment.

Good read, and always nice to meet a brother in Christ and fellow Regent student.

Joe ~ Man I wish I did have some info on that! A re-tool of the whole process has been in the back of my mind for some time now.

Matt~ I thought I heard Jiminy Cricket singing last night. “it’s a small world…” I’m glad you are enjoying your time at Regent! Remember to set aside some time for serious reflection in the year after you graduate. Let your Regent experience percolate in your soul a while before you move on. I found this time to be almost as valuable as my classes.

Thanks for the suggestions! One thing I am planning on doing this Lenten season is more reflection as I feel I have been so focused on studies and other distractions that I have missed out on that and I figure it would be a good habit to do that and the Lent season seemed like the perfect time to get working on that! Wow, that was a long sentence...

In the Celtic tradition "Thin Places" are places where the spiritual and the natural world intersect. It is a place where it is possible to touch and be touched by God. "Thin Spaces" are the moments when we experience a deep sense of God’s presence in our everyday world.