"In A Time Of Universal Deceit, Telling The Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell, Author
.....
"All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First: It Is Ridiculed, Second: It Is Violently Opposed, And Third: It Is
Accepted As Self-Evident" – Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher

Saturday, September 22, 2012

The Myth Of The Jewish Race

I and others in the real truth movement have been trying to get the message out to everyone about the criminals who believe themselves to be the "Chosen Ones", and are out to enslave all of the rest of mankind. I am of course speaking of those who call themselves "Jews".

I have always been perplexed about the nature of Judaism itself, and about its true origins. I have long come to the conclusion that we are dealing with a group of people who's entire past is nothing more than a myth and a massive fraud.

For this article, I want to present the following very interesting article that comes from the website: "The Way Of The Rabbi", at www.jesusneverexisted.com. It is entitled: "The Myth Of The Jewish 'Race'", and it gives some very startling revelations about the truth about the history of those who call themselves "Jews", and presents clear evidence that these people have no past and are nothing more than frauds. I have that article right here for everyone to see for themselves, and I do have my own comments and thoughts to follow:

The
Myth of the Jewish ‘Race’

"Thus saith the Lord God unto Jerusalem; Thy birth and
thy nativity is of the land of Canaan; thy father was an Amorite,
and thy mother an Hittite."

– Ezekiel, 16.17.

The Jews
claim themselves to be a race – but are they?

The earliest reference yet found to this singular people is on
a statue from the Syrian city of Alalakh, dated to about 1550 BC.
The inscription refers to hapiru warriors in the land of Kin’anu – a presence confirmed by clay tablets
from Akhenaten’s capital of Amarna, referring to marauders
in the hill country of Palestine. The famous stele of Pharaoh Merneptah
dated to 1207 BC records 'Israel is laid waste, his seed
is not’. 'Israel' here is a reference to a people, not
a territory.

The weight
of evidence suggests these original ‘Hebrews’ coalesced
during the bronze age from successive migrations,
some from the periphery of the Nile delta (in Egyptian, ‘Peru
or apiru meant a labourer) but most from across the Jordan and
Euphrates
rivers. In their own semitic tongue, habiru meant ‘beyond’,
suggesting an origin elsewhere. In Babylonian script khabiru referred
to a class of slaves. As a people, therefore, the Hebrews combined
Mesopotamian and Egyptian stock, almost certainly drawn from
the lowest social order, conceivably including runaway slaves.
One
migration, at least, brought with it a mountain/sky god – Yahweh
– destined for higher things.

Settlement in Canaan

As barbarous
newcomers to what was the land of Canaan, these semites (speakers
of a tongue common to Syrians, Arabs
and Mesopotamians)
took up migratory occupation of the less fertile hill-country of
the interior. Neither their limited sub-culture – an illiterate
donkey nomadism; nor their social organisation – patriarchal
and authoritarian – distinguished them from other tent-dwelling
pastoralists. These early, polytheistic, Hebrews scratched
an existence in an unpromising land on the fringes of the major
civilisations, occasionally moving with their animals into the
Nile delta in times of draught.

It seems as
if they were joined, over time,by outcasts or refugees from
the more sophisticated Canaanite (Phoenician) coastal cities. ‘Israel emerged peacefully and gradually from within
Canaanite society ‘ concluded Karen Armstrong, the
noted religious scholar. (A History of Jerusalem, p23]

The Canaanite migrants
brought with them cultic practices and images of their traditional
gods. A major Canaanite god was El, and the phrase ‘El
has conquered’ gives us the word Isra’el. The Canaanite
god El had a ghostly presence in a host of Jewish heroes: Dan-i-El;
Ezek-i-El; Sam-u-El, Ish-ma-El, El-i-jah, El-o-him, etc.

God-inspired
names were common throughout the west-Semitic language region.
Other
Canaanite gods included Baal (a storm god) – also honoured
in a host of Hebrew names, Asherah (a fertility goddess, consort
of El), Shalem (a Syrian sun god – later to be honoured
in the name Jeru’salem ), Milcom, Chemosh, etc. Ru’shalimum is
mentioned in records of the Pharaoh Sesostris III (1872 -
1847 BC) – the settlement actually pre-existent long before
the tribe of Hebrews made it their own. The site then appears
to have
been unoccupied for three hundred years until the Jebusites (otherwise
known as Kereti or Peleti – Cretans or
Philistines) arrived.

Blood
Sacrifice

Influenced
by these Canaanite cults, but
devoid of artistic or metal working skills of their own, the
early Hebrews adopted a way of honouring
their god of choice by genital mutilation. This sometime
practice of the Egyptian priesthood became, for the ‘Jews’,
a tribal obligation, part of the male regenerative organ offered
as a blood sacrifice to the ‘jealous’ god Yahweh.
Other gods were worshipped but Yahweh demanded precedence.

For
generations, millions of babies were routinely
circumcised without anaesthetic – sometimes
using a sharpened stone. Even today infant deaths
result from this barbarous mutilation.

The
unkindest cut.

Thus though
the Hebrews were not a race, the males at least acquired a distinctiveness
from
other Semitic tribesmen who did not practice circumcision. Women,
regarded as mere chattels, were spared this mutilation.

In this
period of proto-Judaism, polygamous males acted as ‘priests’ for
their extended families and kinship groups and exercised absolute
authority over wives and children. At some point in the tenth
century
BC the Hebrews were completely overwhelmed by the more advanced
Philistines, moving down from the north. Armed with iron
weapons and deploying chariots the Philistines scattered the
primitive
Hebrew
nomads into the hill country and a few austere places in the
Jordan River valley.

The various
Hebrew clans had no single warlord but were led by
tribal elders and shamans. The backward Hebrews remained under
the sway of their shamanic ‘judges’ to a much later date
than neighbouring peoples. Theirs was a harsh culture of ‘scapegoat’ sacrifice
and collective and inherited guilt (‘eye for
an eye’ vengeance). As marginalised pastoralists they were
acutely xenophobic and demonized the city dwellers and farmers.
With the ebb and flow of empires over centuries, and the endless
movement of peoples, we might have expected this marginal tribe
to have passed into history, along with countless other peoples,
assimilated into a greater multitude.

Sacred History

But we have a story, a tale of tribal fidelity – with
frequent, and instructive, lapses – to a protector god Yahweh,
who had chosen this ‘people’ as his very own. For
them, he has a divine purpose. In particular, their migration into
Canaan is given an heroic re-interpretation. No longer
do we have piecemeal migration over centuries but a single
glorious
conquest
by a cohesive people. The ‘idolatrous’ city dwellers (of
‘Jericho’, etc.) get their comeuppance and the whole
land is promised to the Jews in perpetuity. They have, it would
seem, arrived as a single group from Egypt, released from slavery
by divine intervention.

The extraordinary thing about this ‘history’ - complete
with verbatim dialogue between man and god - is that it was not
written until more than a thousand years after the supposed events.

Records one historian,

"The
first millennium of Jewish history as presented in the Bible has
no empirical foundation whatsoever." – Cantor, The Sacred Chain, p 51.

The impressive
race history, tracing the Jews (the people of Judah), back through
Hebrews
in Canaan and Israelites in Egypt, to a noble ancestor called Abraham
(father, it seems, of all the races, including Greeks and Arabs!),
and the whole melodramatic story of the Exodus, was concocted
at a much later date, after the tribal leadership of these
Judaean tribesmen had been taken into exile and had learned the
rudiments
of civilization from their Babylonian captors. This was not at
the dawn of time but in the seventh century BC, when Greece
was
already a civilization and Carthage had a maritime empire.

Earliest
Jewish writings:
9th century

There was
no written Hebrew before the 9th century BC. At that
time, the Hebrews adapted the Phoenician script.

Phoenician
Alphabet (alternates)

The original
Hebrew/Canaanite occupants of Palestine did pass into history.
Many, including
the so-called ‘lost tribes’ of
Israel (those living in northern Palestine) were assimilated
by Assyrian conquerors during the eighth century.

But
the ‘victors’, a Persian-sponsored priesthood who settled in Judaea in the 6th century BC, wrote a sacred history, known
to the Jews as the Torah (or Pentateuch ) and
to the Christians as the
first 'five books' of the Old Testament. Together with the 'Prophets'
and 'Wisdom' literature this voluminous text purports to be an
account of the
trials and tribulations of the
Jews through
the
previous
two millennia.
Rather oddly, its detail and obvious accuracy peters out the closer
it approaches the time when it was actually written. Joshua,
supposedly
on the rampage in the thirteenth century BC gets vast reportage,
whereas several 7th century kings known to history are omitted.

Indeed, the
four hundred years between the last book of the Old Testament
(the 5th century Malachi) and the first book of
the
New Testament echo in a biblical silence.

No biblical text gives
the conquest of Palestine by Alexander the Great (in 323 BC) a
mention.
Ptolemaic Egypt’s loss of her Palestinian provinces to Syria
in 198 BC is unrecorded. 'Minor' personages like Julius Caesar
and
Pompey the Great are overlooked. And the books of Maccabees –
which should tell us the ‘recent’ story of the successful
Jewish rebellion against Greek rule in the second century BC – are
so blatantly filled with error and incoherence that even biblical
editors shunted them into the ‘Apocrypha’ or
omitted them entirely.

But of course
we are not speaking of
history but rather, of sacred testimony, designed to control,
justify and
inspire.

Anyone can be factual. In the Bible we have a book with a purpose.

"Lachish
Letters" – only first
hand 'evidence' for the entire corpus of the Old Testament

A
Few Bits of Crockery

"They
have entered the land to lay waste ... strong is he who
has come down. He lays waste."

Found in
the ruins of Tell ed-Duweir in the 1930s the fragments
bear a few words of Hebrew relating to the fall of Judaean
cities to the Babylonians in the 580s BC.

The letters
are from outposts of Lachish to the city's military commander
(a man named Ya'osh) and represent field reports monitoring
the situation as the armies of Nebuchadnezzar closed
in.

Some writers
find confirmation of the biblical 'Jeremiah' in these
scraps (Letter XVI to be precise) though the reference
could equally well have been to a 'Urijah'.

Sources:Finkelstein and Silberman, The Bible Unearthed (Touchstone,
2002)Paul Johnson, A History of the Jews (Phoenix Grant,
1987)
Dan Cohn-Sherbok, The Crucified Jew (Harper Collins,1992)
Henry Hart Milman, The History of the Jews (Everyman, 1939)
Josephus, The Jewish War (Penguin, 1959)
Leslie Houlden (Ed.), Judaism & Christianity (Routledge, 1988)
Karen Armstrong, A History of Jerusalem (Harper Collins, 1999)
Jonathan N. Tubb, Canaanites (British Museum Press, 1998)
Norman Cantor, The Sacred Chain - A History of the Jews (Harper Collins,
1994)
Thomas L. Thompson, The Bible in History (Pimlico, 2000)
Shlomo Sand, When and How Was the Jewish People Invented? (Resling, 2008)

NTS Notes: As I have explained in previous articles, we are dealing with a people that base their entire history on nothing more than lies and falsehoods. The facts are that there never was an "Exodus", or a "Passover" or even any "Solomon's Temple". All those lies from their fraudulent Torah are nothing more than inventions by their scribes sometime in the 7th-8th centuries BC.

Today, we have these people going around and still calling themselves the "Chosen People" of their false god "Yahweh", when in fact, they have no real history at all. Modern archaeology in the region of Palestine and Egypt has found no physical evidence of any of their biblical claims. The fact is that there is none and there never was.

I therefore again question how these so called "Chosen Ones" can continue to claim their rights to the land of Palestine through their fraudulent Bible/Torah writings, and continue stealing the land from the people that have the real rights to the region, the Palestinians themselves? Modern research now shows that they have no "biblical" rights to that land at all!

10 comments:

Mouser
said...

The white people of israel are Khazarians and they are not semitic.I believe they are what the bible refers to as false jews. They and their relatives around the world are behaving like a synagogue of satan to the semitic Palestinians and to all who are not Khazarians.

I have been thinking about what is presently going on and the following is my take.

I believe the conquering of lands is taking place by paper. Those seeking to control the world have lent the separate countries 'money' at interest in order to put each country into unrepayable debt. All legalised by laws in each country. Gradually the debts will be called in by the lender and the governments of each country will have no legal choice but to 'sell' the land of the country to those who own the paper debt slips. All legal in each country. Once those conquering the world by paper have acquired all the land in each country they can declare that land off-limits to the former citizens. Agenda 21 comes directly to mind.

In the final result a handful of individual families will own all of the land on earth and all other people will be landless serfs, easily enslaved to work for food and shelter to the world owners.

Paper money and gold have no real value, but land that provides everthing needed to live is infinitely valuable. Own the land and the people are automatically under your full control.

consulting the lie factory for truthful information is a real no go...

it is impossible to find a "Jew" on Earth before the Letter "J" enters the English alphabet...

imagine a coke snortin' whoremongering DALLAS COWBOY at the Alamo...get a Kodak or Polaroid of that scene and you'll be able to put a Khazar "Proselyte" to Talmudic Judaism in the Old Testament...

consulting a Liar for truth is not logical...

The children of Israel are the white people Nations and while this is not consistent with the debunking of the so-called "Jewish" race {narrative} piece above, one must look at the "Results" of the "Results" oriented organization [Body of Lies]....

Khazar "Proselytes" to the stool sculpture deity cult....calling themselves "Jews" who engage in Identity Theft, real estate fraud, mass murder, terrorism, and HATE THE TRUTH SPEECH....and call themselves Israel are LIARS & Murderers....Just like Jesus declared @ John 8:44....a book of "Myths" right,...but Jesus was not speaking to Khazars in Yiddish in the Temple Treasury...

one might also avail themselves of a copy [1924] of Mackeys Encyclopedia of Freemasonry & Manley P. Halls' Secret Teachings of All Ages...both works rely heavily on the Talmudic "Jewish" version/narrative....which is based on a big fat lie...

just sayin'....sound, logical historically accurate conclusions are not based on "Jewish" myths that are based on Jewish Lies to thwart real results that benefit mankind....in Real Time.

Exposing the fraudulent history of the Jews strikes at the root of the power of their mythology. Here is some more information on the subject:

Fables of Ancient Israel Now Being Dissected

Excerpt:

Be ready for a major upsetting of the apple cart. Unknown to almost all laymen, a huge number of scholars have quietly come together agreeing on a historical fact that will overturn the entirety of “court history” when all the facts they have gathered become widely known. They agree that the various tales of “ancient Israel” are largely ﬁctional...

Read the rest:http://barnesreview.org/pdf/TBR2007-no3-4-16.pdf

Much of the history of the Jews can be traced to Egypt, not Jerusalem, e.g.:

“The names given to characters in the Biblical Exodus account are generic. They were deliberately chosen to represent historical persons both in the time of the first Moses (Auibre/Hammurabi of the Late Middle Kingdom) and the time of the second Moses (Akhenaten of the Amarna Period).”http://www.domainofman.com/book/chap-16.html

David

“………. the most significant fact of all in establishing the identity of David is that the biblical account of his campaigns matches in precise detail the accounts of the battles fought by Tuthmosis III,, whose details are to be found inscribed in the Annals, a 223-line document at the granite holy of holies the king built after his Year 40 (1439 BCE) at Karnak (modern Luxor) in Upper Egypt, on the east bank of the Nile opposite the Valley of the kings.”http://calum33.multiply.com/tag/egypt

“Whence the idea of one-God may have come has already been shown, although the earlier Egyptians themselves may have received it from others. The figure of Moses himself, and his Law, both were taken from material already existing. The story of Moses’s discovery in the bulrushes was plainly borrowed from the much earlier legend (with which it is identical) of a king of Babylonia, Sargon the Elder, who lived between one and two thousand years before him; the Commandments much resemble earlier law codes of the Egyptians, Babylonians and Assyrians…”

Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zionhttp://www.kasjo.net/reeedcontrov.pdf

Forbidden Knowledge: the Bible’s Origins

Excerpt:

I understand that Genesis is _denying, refuting and challenging_ the Mesopotamian myths’ explanation of Who, What, Why, Where, When and How man came to made, what his purpose on earth is, and why he does not possess immortality. I understand that the Hebrews accomplished these denials or challenges by taking motifs and concepts from a variety of contradicting myths and giving them “new twists,” changed the names of the characters, the locations, and sequences of events. It is my understanding that the Hebrews were deliberately CHANGING _or_ RECASTING various motifs and concepts within these myths IN ORDER TO REFUTE, DENY, AND CHALLENGE THEM, hence the “reason why” there are _no_ individuals called Adam, Eve, the Serpent, Yahweh, Noah, Shem, Japheth and Ham appearing in _any_ of the Mesopotamian pre-biblical myths. This understanding explains why there appear to be “echoes” or “parallels” or “similarities” between Genesis and the Mesopotamian concepts and motifs regarding man’s creation. I do _not_ understand that the Hebrews are “copying” the Mesopotamian myths, they are _borrowing and recasting various motifs within them_ in order to _refute and deny them_ regarding why, when, where and how man came to be made, placed in a god’s garden, denied immortality and his destruction sought in a Flood. These “recastings” are accomplished primarily via the employment of “inversions” which, in effect, present a 180 degree counter-argument to the earlier mythic concepts of the Mesopotamians, as was penetratingly noted by the late Joseph Campbell in his four volume series of books exploring the mythologies of the world, ancient and modern, called The Masks of God (1959-1968).

Yah or Iah was a well known Moon God throughout the Ancient Middle East, whilst ‘Amen’ or ‘Ymn’ was another general name for the One God who appears in Egypt about the time of the first Shepherd Kings, named Hyksos by the Greeks……Many will be familiar with the name YAHWEH, yet have no idea whatsoever that this is simply the plural form of the God, YAH or IAH.…According to Gerald Massey in his great work, ‘Ancient Egypt – Light of the World’ (1907), those who worshipped Iah/Io, became known as ‘Jews’:

” There was a religion of the god Іu or Iao in Egypt thirteen thousand years ago. That god was Atum-Ιu, born son of Ptah. He was the earliest father in heaven because he was the divine Ra in his primordial sovereignty. He is the god in two persons who was first figured as the sun upon the double horizon = the father in the west, the son in the east. This god went forth from Kam by several names and various routes. Those who worshipped him as Atum became the Adamites, the Edomites, the red men; those who worshipped him as Iao, Iah, or Іu became the Jews in many lands and these are the Jews of that world-wide dispersion recognized by Isaiah, which did not follow any known historical exodus from Egypt or captivity in Babylon, or migration from Palestine.

Read the rest:http://calum33.multiply.com/journal/item/50/THE_REAL_JESUS

In 1992 Philip R. Davies, a professor of Biblical Studies at the University of Sheffield, provoked a storm that still rages in academic circles by arguing that both archaeological evidence and clear thinking about the Bible narrative forced one to conclude that the Israel of the Bible never existed.

There was no historical Abraham, no real-life Moses, no Kingdom of David and Solomon. The Israel of the Bible, he argued, was a story-book fiction written as late as (even late) Persian times. Another author, Thomas L. Thompson, compared the Biblical story of ancient Israel with the myth of King Arthur and his kingdom of Camelot....

Common Sense and Credulity

When was the Bible written? The answer to this is vital for understanding the origin of its stories (or history) about Israel. Scholars have traditionally assumed that two events in the Bible narrative give the vital clues about when it was written. But did they really happen? How do we know? Or are we again arguing in a circle? Are we being a bit credulous and lacking commonsense to think they really did?

Did These 2 Key Events Really Happen?

EVENT 1: The Babylonian Captivity

The most well-known of these events is the King of Babylon sending the Jews into exile. The common image has been of Jewish captives carrying their scrolls of their history and traditions as they are forced to walk to Babylonia where they will become as slaves. Once in Babylonia they take time to reflect on their past sins that led to their exile and collectively repent and pine and ache to return again and do everything right this time. While in captivity their scribes are imagined to have written up the final form of their books recording their history and laws in order to preserve their national and racial identity and strengthen their faith in their God. Then when the time was right, with their first edition of the Bible in hand, they would all return back to Palestine more zealous to obey their God than ever before.

It is a very romantic picture and has nothing in common with what we know about mass deportations and the enslaving of conquered peoples in ancient times. The whole point of deporting populations into slavery in foreign lands was, firstly, to smash any sense of identity and organization they once had as a people to render them incapable of ever rebelling; and secondly, to reorganize economic resources. ...EVENT 2: Discovery of the Book of the Covenant and the Reforms of Josiah

The other presumed historical period was the discovery of "a book of the covenant" in the Jerusalem Temple that led to the reforms of King Josiah. The only evidence that such a book was ever discovered and that this king ever existed or enacted these reforms is the story itself found in 2 Kings 22-23....If such a story as this were found anywhere except in the Bible it would simply lack credibility. Readers would assume it was a fable.

Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus: Hellenistic Histories and the Date of the Pentateuchby Russell E. Gmirkin

Overview

Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus proposes a provocative new theory regarding the date and circumstances of the composition of the Pentateuch. Gmirkin argues that the Hebrew Pentateuch was composed in its entirety about 273–272 BCE by Jewish scholars at Alexandria that later traditions credited with the Septuagint translation of the Pentateuch into Greek. The primary evidence is literary dependence of Gen. 1–11 on Berossus’ Babyloniaca (278 BCE) and of the Exodus story on Manetho’s Aegyptiaca (c. 285–280 BCE), and the geo-political data contained in the Table of Nations. A number of indications point to a provenance of Alexandria, Egypt for at least some portions of the Pentateuch. That the Pentateuch, drawing on literary sources found at the Great Library of Alexandria, was composed at almost the same date as the Septuagint translation, provides compelling evidence for some level of communication and collaboration between the authors of the Pentateuch and the Septuagint scholars at Alexandria’s Museum. The late date of the Pentateuch, as demonstrated by literary dependence on Berossus and Manetho, has two important consequences: the definitive overthrow of the chronological framework of the Documentary Hypothesis, and a late, third century BCE date for major portions of the Hebrew Bible which show literary dependence on the Pentateuch.

Purpose: to explain the origin of the Greek version of the Old Testament or Jewish Bible, the Septuagint, the LXX.

Contents:

1. Librarian of the Egyptian Alexandrian library, Demetrius, writes to his king Ptolemy Philadelphus “about acquisitions policy”. He points out that the library lacks a copy of the “Books of the Laws of the Jews”, and that the only extant ones are in Hebrew and of inferior quality since they have not had royal warrant to guarantee their accurate transmission.2. The king responds giving Demetrius permission to ask the Jewish high priest, Eleazar, to send 6 representatives from each of the twelve tribes of Israel “to prepare a perfect, official translation.”3. The letter defends the ritual codes of the Jews in the Law, explaining that these are all allegories for deeper philosophical conduct and are not meant to be interpreted literally. The ethical standards of the Book are praised.4. The letter concludes with the acceptance of the new translation by all the Jews at Alexandria.

Evidence of forgery:

The Demetrius in question was never the librarian of the Alexandrian library under Ptolemy Philadelphus (who disliked him). Grafton cites Pfeiffer, History, 100-101 for other errors as well, but I have not yet had a chance to consult this.

Sophistication of the lie:

The author uses the methods that Alexandrian critics had developed to correct texts and detect fakes to make his own text seem all the more credible.

Example:

1. he uses the allegorical method to “explain away” or justify the crude dietary and other ritualistic codes of the Jews just as other contemporary scholars had used allegory to rationalize the more barbaric and tasteless sections of Homer.2. he discusses how the correct translations were arrived at in part through standard textual criticism — collating all the variant manuscripts and emendations available — to suggest the most scholarly methods of determining accuracy were used and to strengthen the credibility of his narrative3. rather than just tell a narrative story about the negotiations between Demetrius and Ptolemy, he “quotes word for word” from Demetrius’ memorandum. Adding a touch of realism like this (a lie within a lie) enhances the credibility of his letter.4. he writes for two audiences: for Jews of Palestine to demonstrate that the Greek translation is superior to their Hebrew version; for gentiles to demonstrate that the Jewish ritual laws are not meaningless but allegorical philosophical codes.5. his motive is not money, but a desire to assert the spiritual authority of the Septuagint over the Hebrew bible.

Grafton comments that this forgery is one of the most complex to survive, but it is really but one example of a very large population. “The early Christians produced them by the dozen” (p.17)

Read the rest:http://vridar.wordpress.com/2009/07/04/forgery-in-the-ancient-world/

In order to explain why ancient historians hadn’t written about the invented jewish history, the Letter of Aristeas states:

“The books of the law of the Jews (with some few others) are absent from the library. They are written in the Hebrew characters and language and have been carelessly interpreted, and do not represent the original text as I am informed by those who know; for they have never had a king’s care to protect them. It is necessary that these should be made accurate for your library since the law which they contain, in as much as it is of divine origin, is full of wisdom and free from all blemish. For this reason literary men and poets and the mass of historical writers have held aloof from referring to these books and the men who have lived and are living in accordance with them, because their conception of life is so sacred and religious, as Hecataeus of Abdera says.”

Solomon, the quintessential Jewish wiseguy, allegedly ruled over a great empire and built a fabulous temple in Jerusalem, but archeologists have not found a trace of evidence to support the Hebrew myth.

To learn who Solomon really was and where the temple was located, go here:

THE OFFERING TABLES OF THE KING SOLOMONhttp://calum33.multiply.com/tag/solomon

Scroll down the page for links to a nine part series of articles about King Solomon.

Excerpts:

Despite his great renown in the Bible, there isn't one shred of historical evidence that a King Solomon ever existed in the land that is now the Israel of the 21st Century.

His fame is such that like other biblical names, it is a translation or substitution hiding his real identity.

However when we relocate the search to Egypt, there is so much that cannot be ignored. In fact there can be no doubt at all that King Solomon was the Pharaoh Amenhotep III AND in some biblical verses his son Amenhotep IV who was also known as Akhenaten....Solomon's Wives and Concubines

Seven hundred wives has to be only in the wild imagination of the biblical scribe. Concubines are numbered separately, so the wives cannot be just ladies of his Harem, unless there was some kind of grading within that part of his palace. Just imagine the continual marriage ceremonies. Since his reign lasted almost 40 years that would be nearly 18 marriages for every years of his rule.

We do know the names of some wives, especially his number one wife, Queen Etiye and we'll have a look at these in a moment. The concubines are easily found in historical fact, so we'll deal with these first.

A total of Five Commemorative Scarabs have been found that mention Marriages of Ymn Htp III with foreign princesses....Solomon's PalacesKoran - The Chapter of The Ant - 27 Mecca - (E H Palmer translation) "And it was said to her, 'Enter the court;' and when she saw it, she reckoned it to be an abyss of water, and she uncovered her legs. Said he, 'Verily, it is a court paved with glass!' "

Now this is a very strong piece of evidence - ARCHAEOLOGISTS HAVE FOUND FRAGMENTS OF GLAZED TILES THAT REPRESENTED WATER AND SOME WITH PICTURES OF SWIMMING DUCKS AND FISH. WALL AND CEILING MURALS SHOWED BIRDS FLYING. BUT ONLY IN THE RUINS OF THE PALACE OF YMNHTP III AT MALQATA ON THE WEST BANK OF THE NILE FROM LUXOR...Solomon's Reign1 Kings 11:42 -"He was king in Jerusalem over all Israel for forty years." Amenhotep III was King of both Egypt and the land that became Israel. It is now generally accepted that his reign lasted from 1382 BCE to 1344BCE, and according to the historian Manetho, his rule lasted for 38 years and 7 months.

The search for the biblical Mt Sinai has been an enduring facet of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, and its location has been reported as being in locations as remote as the Sinai peninsular and the deserts of Saudi Arabia. But why should this mountain be so important to the three Judaic religions, and how did its location become to be forgotten?

The answer to the first question is relatively easy to answer, Mt Sinai was the location where Moses spoke to god, indeed it was rumoured that the Israelite god actually lived inside this mountain. The second question, however, is more difficult. Here is the most sacred mountain of the Israelites, the home of their all-powerful god, and someone simply forgot where it was! The scenario is simply not credible. But if such an important location was not forgotten, then it must have been deliberately mislaid or covered up - but such reasoning by definition presupposes that there was something to hide.

So what, in this case, were the Israelite leadership trying to hide from us?......The truth that lies below the surface of the Torah, Bible and Koran, is that the Israelite people were a very influential faction in Lower Egypt during the thirteenth to seventeenth dynasties of Egypt. They were a substantially Egyptianised people and one of their main functions was the control and supervision of the religious ceremonies upon the Giza plateau. The Israelites achieved this powerful position through the slaughter of the original supervisors of the Giza plateau - a military campaign that is still preserved in the biblical account of the defeat of the Troglodytes (Horim) by the patriarch Esau (the brother of Jacob). The Bible is strangely silent on why the Israelites would want to slaughter a tribe of lowly Troglodytes, but the fact that these cave dwellers were actually a very influential tribe who controlled access to the sacred chambers of the Giza pyramids makes the whole scenario much more comprehensible. With the defeat of the Troglodytes, the Israelites had become the Guardians of the Giza Plateau and the associated sacred chambers of the pyramids. The sacred Israelite 'mountain' that held their all-powerful deity was called Sinai - the Great Pyramid.

The Best Sites Exposing The Truth About Israel's 9:11 Attacks On America

Best Sites For Exposing The Apollo Moon Landings Hoax!

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Notice

§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40 Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

About Myself

Canadian male, age 57..(Hard to believe I am that old..)
Sickened by the lies of history, and how our education system has ruined and failed our childrens' minds, I decided it was time to take a stand and put up real articles of truthful information.
Willing to fight to see truth come out, and to have the true criminals on our planet exposed for their crimes against humanity.
I am in this for the truth and where ever the truth leads me!
********************************************************
Northerntruthseeker is fully responsible for all content in this blog. If any errors or omissions are deemed necessary for correction of material, it will be placed into the articles affected, and notice will be put up for all readers. Northerntruthseeker will never accept money, personal gifts, or any threats, given for any material posted in this blog.
The information articles in this blog are free for everyone to take and spread to others.
In these times of uncertainty, people deserve the truth no matter how harsh it may be!