The movement started with the Dandi March in March 1930. The British had a monopoly or complete control over the manufacture of salt. Indians were not allowed to collect salt from the sea. Instead they were forced to buy it from the British at high prices. Gandhiji decided to defy this law and he along with 78 followers marched the over 300 kilometre distance from Sabarmati to Dandi on the Gujarat Coast. On the coast he picked up a handful of salt breaking the Salt Law. This was an open defiance of the British.

This excerpt from an Oxford School Education Primary Social Studies book (Book 5), for children of Grade 5, authored by Vibha Roy and Reena Jain, provides an introduction to the Dandi March. Just like this excerpt, the book is made up of many others on many different phases of our History. Typical questions asked of the reader are factual, concerned with date, place, names and events.

And just like the excerpt above, those paragraphs introduce many complicated terms – “monopoly”, “manufacture of salt”, “price”, “law” etc. – that if the reader does not understand, will make it difficult to fully understand the story being told.

The Instructional Designer would hopefully find faults – the mention of the Salt Law is left to the end while it is being described at the beginning; there are assumptions about prior knowledge not substantiated here or anywhere else in the curriculum in Grade 5, how does one pick up a handful of salt on a coast?; why is it important to know the number 78? and so on. The Visual Designer would want a map from Sabarmati to Dandi or an early photograph or clip (if it was a WBT) from Attenborough’s film on Gandhi, to help the reader visualize the context.

Children also learn how October 2, his birthday, is celebrated through a UN resolution, as the International Day of Non-violence. A quick search on the web does reveal that world leaders are inspired by Gandhi’s strategy of non-violence and civil disobedience.

Irrespective of whatever else, the excerpt would need to be backed by an array of explanations for an inquisitive child. Personally for me, these few lines took over 30 minutes to build context for and introduce. There was a lot of passion too that I have about how Gandhi did all this and that needed to be translated.

Building on another fact, that Gandhi was born in 1869, I asked two uncomfortable questions which I had never asked before:

What was Gandhi’s age when he embarked on the Dandi March?

Why did he walk all the way when he was so old and alternative means of transportation were available for a man of his age and national importance?

If you do not know the answer, Gandhi was 61 and frail. And he walked all that way to do a few very strategic things:

He started with 78 followers but many hundreds joined him from villages and towns on the way to Dandi when they understood what he was up to.

These followers went through the hardship of walking with Gandhi (and he was a fast tireless walker), spent days and nights together, perhaps chanting national revolutionary songs and having heated debates on the British.

Several leaders must have emerged who handled administrative and other tasks as well as showed resilience, courage and ability to manage other people

Put a slow pressure on the British government. It was like a slow boiling kettle of water that threatened the defences of the British system and introduced uncertainty within their system of how to handle this.

Gave Gandhi a chance to take multiple opinions on what exactly to do when they reached Dandi. If Attenborough’s film is to be believed, Gandhi’s people had it organized very well. The British had barricaded the entrance to that particular beach. The people organized themselves in rows of 5-6 people each and approached the entrance while the women went about frantically arranging makeshift beds and medical supplies. When they were ready to start, they simply disobeyed the waiting police phalanx and walked into blows on the head and body by heavy police lathis (sticks) which left them injured and bleeding. The injured were ferried to medical care and the next batch of 5-6 people stepped forward to receive their reward. This kept on happening minute after minute, hour after hour.

He also achieved multiple objectives here, not the most unimportant of those was highlighting the hapless atrocity of the British colonial mindset.

Very importantly, the March exemplified how a strategy can be supported implementationally by tactics. For example, look for a similar strain of thought in the Swadeshi (indigenous) movement, which exhorted people, in a non-violent manner, to stop buying British goods.

Most of these ideas can be connected to many other parts of the History book’s description of the Struggle for Independence in India. Those parts that explain why Gandhi was really a great leader.

However, for most children, these are a group of paragraphs and a set of factual questions waiting to be memorized for the Unit test around the corner.

What are we doing to our children?

The brilliant teacher can not spend too much time on these lines, bound by the pressure of introducing 5000 years of history books paragraphs in a single academic year. No amount of out of class activities and building posters on India’s Independence Movement can recreate the passion or understanding. The less brilliant teacher would perhaps not even know the meaning of “strategic”.

Certainly, most of them would not have a degree in Instructional and Visual Design or even group collaborative methods. Perhaps one of the most painful things, by way of acknowledging the presence of the Internet, are a few long web links “printed” at the end of the chapter, which the student has to type in to a browser, if she ever has time left over.

I am treating this in agonizing detail because the Grade 5 student studies such books across language, maths, science and social studies as part of their ever expanding curriculum.

Frankly, I think I am missing the point here. Either we should be exposing to children the passions, experiences, concepts and people around us in a way that both informs and generates reflection, or we should stop this waste of precious time – maybe focus on core skills – communication, team work, critical thinking, problem solving etc. – building in them the capability to comprehend more advanced topics later in life.

Maybe the way to teach history is to take a few case studies or topics indicative of the phase or area and let children build the skills to explore and comprehend different aspects in an academic year. They will learn more and retain much more.

Same for curriculum design. If one area cannot build up on another in a mutually reinforcing manner, we are actually enforcing an unnatural specialization upon children. Why, at least in the initial formative years should there be so many different subjects – silos artificially created that compartmentalize and constrain knowledge and learning?

Share this:

Like this:

For those who are not aware, Kahani is the Hindi word for Story. And this gentleman tells a story like no one else I know. His use of metaphors is wondrous.

The Torrent of Words, by the way, thunders down from the Sea of Stories into the Lake of Wisdom, who waters are illuminated by the Dawn of Days, and out of which flows the River of Time. The Lake of Wisdom, as is well known, stands in the shadow of the Mountain of Knowledge at whose summit burns the Fire of Life.

And talking about the River Silsila (Silsila means a chain of something, for example, a chain of thoughts, events, conversations):

The new river was shining in the silver sunlight, shining like money, like a million mirrors tilted towards the sky, like a new hope. and as Luka looked into the water and saw there the thousand thousand thousand and one different strands of liquid, flowing together, twining around and around one another, flowing in and out of one another, and turning into a different thousand thousand thousand and one strands of liquid, he suddenly understood what he was seeing. It was the same enchanted water that his brother, Haroun, had seen in the Ocean of the Streams of Story eighteen years ago, and it had tumbled down in a Torrent of Words from the Sea of Stories into the Lake of Wisdom and flowed out to meet him. So this was – it had to be – what Rashid Khalifa had called it: the River of Time itself, and the whole history of everything was flowing along his very eyes, transformed into shining, mingling, multicoloured story streams.

I don’t think Salman Rushdie would have intended to write this as a definition of our networked learning world in Luka and the Fire of Life, but then, what do you know?

Share this:

Like this:

I attended the CLO Summit (#CLOSummit) in Mumbai last week. It was an interesting conference bringing together the CLO and HR community – companies like Infosys, Wipro, Deloitte and GE, Government sector representation with DPE, NSDC, NABARD & others and vendors such as HBP, 24X7, LearningMate and many others. I went to the summit trying to get a sense of the mindset and innovations that exist today. Some observations based on the participation (may not be entirely generalizable):

Face to face/virtual instructor led training is the dominant mindset today, but with a growing understanding that, given the scale, that e-based methodologies need to be quickly incorporated

Large companies like GE and Deloitte already have well established processes in place which they have perfected over the years. There is a lot of thinking and innovation into how programs for leadership and management can be innovated upon with a strong focus on mentorship and coaching.

The government sector behemoth seems to be waking up to the possibility of high productivity growth because of structural changes made by increasing accountability.

Vendors are ahead of the curve already, talking about social learning networks and Web X.0. But companies, with the sterling exception of Infosys, which has understood that knowledge management and learning are intimately connected, do not yet understand how community/network led learning can contribute. In fact, informal learning ranked the lowest among the priorities in a survey. It was good to see HBP (Harvard Business Publishing) take a jab at combining community features inside a program though I could see slow adoption of informal approaches (they called it blended learning) among the participants.

Social Media: Although there is an appreciation that the younger generation is digitally driven, it does not really factor into any large scale impacts. There were only about 6 people out of over a hundred that were tweeting. I am pretty sure none of the CLOs were, mostly vendors.

India’s demographic dividend, the mass of over 500 million people who comprise India’s working population, and the challenges that it poses for us, was clearly identified by NSDC.

Custom eLearning is still a relatively small thing in the mindset – OTS courses such as those provided by Skillsoft and HBP are more in vogue

Conferences are not yet open like in the West. There is pretty much no thought on opening up and sharing in a structured manner using social media.

Smaller companies are struggling with the role of the CLO – the mindset of the typical CEO is inimical to the aspirations of the CLO with a voiced apprehension over the business impact of specific learning interventions – a very fundamental disconnect between the two roles.

The conference also brought out, through the blunt presence of Sudhir Mishra, film maker, the fact that clearly the dominant teaching-learning paradigm in corporate India is clearly more informal, on-the-job than formal, in any form. This conclusion may sound startling given the focus on formal classroom training, but it is my perception that business in general values the on-the-job much more than classroom at this point. It values classroom or virtual, because that provides scalability to some extent, but ultimately, its between the manager and the worker, a web of intricate inter-dependence.

This is clearly reflected in the challenges voiced by HR professionals – business is not responsive to L&D demands. It is not responsive because it feels more comfortable doing the training by itself, in informal settings, on the job. That is not just a matter of delegation or expertise, it is more a time-tested method by practitioners living the business every moment. And that method, despite all the L&D expertise, is still preferred with L&D doing the basic job, the more mechanical learning, the coordination and structure.

But the most disconcerting thing that emerged was that there was absolutely no emphasis on learning in the CLO’s role definition. The CLO was mainly perceived to be, as Wikipedia puts it, is the “highest-ranking corporate officer concerning talent or learning management of a corporation or agency”.

Of course, the CLO is a business facing education manager, but in my opinion, she is there to co-create a learning organization – an organization where learning and innovation is a culture – rather than being there to create the most fantastic learning process management systems based on roles, competencies and abilities frameworks.

She is there to bring expertise on how learning should happen, on how to harness the knowledge in her organization, in unleashing the power of collaboration through technology, on making her workforce responsive and adaptable.

And in that role, she will find, that she does not need to train, but just connect and facilitate learning experiences. And to expose business to how they can train themselves better through technology.

It is a different perspective – one that involves the shedding of any feeling whatsoever of being able to control “training” or “showing RoI” – while at the same time sharing the goal that a more learned workforce is a business requirement.