November 16, 2010

Five Reasons To Take Hamid Karzai's Latest Rant Seriously
Posted by Michael Cohen

Over at the Swampland Blog, occasional international travel partner, former Brooklyn hipster and all-around good egg Michael Crowley has raised an excellent point about my take on the latest Karzai/Petraeus dust-up:

Though genuinely difficult in all sorts of ways, Karzai has always played something of a two-step, publicly bashing American military tactics in ways that are popular with his people--he called for an end to U.S. air strikes more than a year ago--while privately maintaining good relations with our military leaders.

So it may be that Karzai is playing to his base, so to speak. (The same may be true of his unrealistic demand that all foreign contractors leave the country, under a deadline that he has already extended.) Because I find it hard to believe that the Afghan leader really wants the bulk of America's forces out of his country anytime soon. Protected only by his own government's security forces, Karzai's days would be numbered. For the moment, Karzai needs us as much as we need him.

This is a pretty compelling point - and Crowley might be right here - but I think there are several other factors to consider and this gives me an opportunity to flesh out some of the arguments that I groggily made yesterday.

1) Don't Mess With My Junk . . .

I too find it hard to believe that Karzai wants American troops to leave the country anytime soon; after all I'm sure he's seen the pictures of a murdered Najibullah with his you-know-what no more and would prefer to avoid that fate.

But if you read Karzai's comments closely he's not lobbying for US troops to leave; instead he seems to be suggesting that the large US military footprint - and the newly aggressive US military approach - needs to be reduced. That doesn't seem like an unreasonable argument - and I'm at a complete loss as to why that wouldn't be acceptable to an overwhelming majority of Americans, including the President of the United States. Seriously, the Afghan President wants to reduce the number of US troops in Afghanistan . . . where do I sign on the dotted line for that one?

2) How Is This Karzai Anti-American Rant Different From All Other Karzai Anti-American Rants?

A few people have raised the point that this is not the first time Karzai has complained about the US military and the death of Afghan civilians from American arms. And the cynical might argue, as Crowley does, that this is nothing more than political posturing. Certainly this might be correct. But here's the crucial difference: this time David Petraeus threw a public hissy fit and leaked to the Washington Post that he would consider resigning if Karzai doesn't fly right.

So sure Karzai might just be playing politics . . . but someone in the US military doesn't see this as business as usual. That seems a bit consequential.

3) Don't Take Away My Toys . . .

As for why Petraeus chose this opportunity to publicly attack Karzai; I haven't the foggiest. But one thought comes to mind. Over the past several weeks the US military has embraced a tactical shift that it once vehemently rejected - the heightened use of kinetic action against Taliban insurgents. As Danger Room noted the other day:

The U.S. and its allies have unleashed a massive air campaign in Afghanistan, launching missiles and bombs from the sky at a rate rarely seen since the war’s earliest days. In October alone, NATO planes fired their weapons on 1,000 separate missions.” These figures represent a 50% increase over the same time period in 2009.

And why is this happening: so that Petraeus can show progress before the NATO summit and the White House's December review. After all, it's not as if that whole hearts and minds thing was working out so well. So Karzai's words are basically a shot across the bow to Petraeus - and a rejection of his shift in tactical emphasis. If Karzai's words gained traction that would be a disaster for Petraeus and would probably ensure that come the July 2011 deadline the military would be unable to point to any real progress being made in Afghanistan.

4) How's That Whole COIN Thing Working Out?

But there's another crucial element to consider here as well; the entire US strategy in Afghanistan is predicated on a counter-insurgency model that relies on host country support from the Afghan government. But here you have the Afghan president saying that he doesn't support the strategy that is nominally being fought in his name. That's a problem; not only in undermining a COIN strategy, but also in undermining the current fetishization of COIN in the US military. Whether Petraeus has intended it or not, his blow-up - as well as Karzai's constant complaints - is an extraordinary indictment of the entire population-centric COIN strategy. I mean if you don't have host country support . . . you don't have a COIN strategy (at least according to the military's own counter-insurgency manual).

5) Things That Make You Go Hmm

Finally, one of Crowley's commenters makes the point that I wish I had made:

It seems that Karzai says something to this effect every couple of months. At what point do you stop saying he's playing to his base and actually means this stuff?

It's an excellent question.

UPDATE: Michael Crowley has reminded me that he lived in Cobble Hill, which is not Brooklyn Heights, but isn't exactly hipster-ville. Also, he has no ironic facial hair and/or eyewear and doesn't own a wallet chain or a porkpie hat. So in retrospect the use of the term hipster is incorrect. I apologize to Michael and all members of his family!

Comments

One day, I had discovered my letter in class’s and grade’s mailbox (I am that person who is responsible to get other’s letter in class and grade), I was happy, also did not attend to other letter, had disassembled my letter nearby the mailbox, inside only there was a silver bangle, on the bracelet was engraving “love you, pandora”. I am happy, because my English name is Pandora, but I never told my English name to anybody. Who was knew that my English name, I thought it over had not guessed correctly this person, who someone did instruct my name in my schoolmate quietly.
I did not know pandora bangles was also not the name of pandora silver charms, it was the king of the world-renowned Pandora charm store, and I was thinking that one who presented it to me.

Few people have raised, that this is not the first time Karzai has appealed to the U.S. military and the deaths of Afghan civilians by U.S. weapons. And the cynic might argue, as Crowley, this is nothing more than political ideology.

Our ugg boots clearance nails aren’t just a convenient place to put colored polish. Nails, on both the fingers and the toes, are made of keratin, the same stuff our hair contains, only denser and harder. Nails are the primate equivalent of hooves and claws on other animals. Animals use their claws or talons to catch prey, climb trees, and defend themselves. Humans have evolved to the point where fingernails are not vital for survival, but there’s no doubt that they’re useful ugg boots clearance. They help when we’re performing fine motor skills, like untying knots and preparing food. They’re also important for scratching (a pleasurable experience most mammals enjoy) and grooming ugg boots clearance.

Toenails are less important than fingernails ugg boots clearance. At this stage of our evolution, they’re little more than remnants. Watching apes and monkeys use their feet to grasp objects reminds us that at one point it was useful to have nails on our toes, but they’re simply not as necessary now. Apes and monkeys also have opposable thumbs on their feet that help their dexterity. Since humans don’t have these, our feet are useful mainly for ambulation ugg boots clearance.

One thing that nails are not for is protection of the nail bed. Contrary to popular belief, they serve no protective purpose ugg boots clearance, and without fingernails or toenails, our digits would not be uncomfortably sensitive; the nail bed would simply become harder and tougher to accommodate the new level of exposure ugg boots outlet.

Aredhel Ar-Feiniel, the White Lady of the Noldor, daughter of Fingolfin, dwelt in Nevrast with Turgon her brother, and she went with him to the Hidden Kingdom. But she wearied of ugg boots clearanceof Gondolin, desiring ever the longer the more to ride again in the wide lands and to walk in the forests, as had been her wont in Valinor: and when two hundred years had passed since Gondolin was full-wrought with louis vuitton outlet, she spoke to Turgon and asked leave to depart. Turgon was loath to grant this, and long denied her; but at the last he yielded, saying: 'Go then, if you will though it is against my wisdom, and I forebode that ill will come of it both to you and to me. But you shall go only to seek Fingon, our brother; and those ugg boots outletthat I send with you shall return hither to Gondolin as swiftly as they may.'
But Aredhel said: 'I am your sister and not your servant, and beyond your bounds I will go as seems good to me. And if you begrudge me an escort, then I will go alone.'

On my Egypt Air flight yesterday to Cairo, I witnessed one of the more intriguing in-flight exchanges that I can remember. A bearded, well-dressed man sitting a few seats behind me began shouting at the flight attendant. He was complaining that the in-flight movie was inappropriate. What are these “offensive images?” he asked. These included a 15-minute stretch of the movie where at least one woman at any given time was wearing a bikini. In a couple of scenes at a club, members of opposite sexes were dancing in close proximity while, it appeared, consuming alcoholic beverages. “Are we really all Westernized now?” the man behind me asked, as if posing a question to those of us in the back of the plane.

The man’s arguments were rather interesting. He pointed out that if you took a poll of the passengers,ugg boots outlet most would agree the film was morally offensive. He asked the attendant, “if we ask the passengers what they think and they agree with me, then what will you do?” The attendant responded, “we don’t take public opinion (ra’i al ‘am) on the airplane.” The man was right: most passengers, and most Egyptians – the vast majority of whom don’t drink, go to clubs, or wear bikinis – would object to the film’s content. But at what point do they have the right to restrict minority expressions of unfaithfulness?

It was an odd, amusing exchange that justified the otherwise unpleasant experience of flying on EgyptAir.ugg boots clearance But it was a reminder of the fundamental lack of consensus in the Arab world over the boundaries and limits of the state. There are two groups – Islamists and secular elites – with worldviews which couldn’t be more different. They live parallel lives in parallel worlds, with parallel institutions. They rarely intersect.ugg boots clearance One group believes it has both history and the Egyptian people on its side. The other side, considerably smaller in number, likely has neither. It does, however, have the power.

Sunday’s elections will be just another version of this.ugg boots clearance The main players are the Muslim Brotherhood – populist, religious, and righteous – and the regime coalition which, with its president soon to pass, finds itself in an uncertain place. Both sides are strong in different ways – and weak in others. Neither seems to have anything resembling a coherent strategy for dealing with the impending transition that is soon to come.

But there's another crucial element to consider here as well; the entire US strategy in Afghanistan is predicated on a counter-insurgency model that relies on host country support from the Afghan government. But here you have the Afghan president saying that he doesn't support the strategy that is nominally being fought in his name. That's a problem; not only in undermining a COIN strategy, but also in undermining the current fetishization of COIN in the US military. Whether Petraeus has intended it or not, his blow-up - as well as Karzai's constant complaints - is an extraordinary indictment of the entire population-centric COIN strategy. I mean if you don't have host country support . . . you don't have a COIN strategy (at least according to the military's own counter-insurgency manualsohbet chatseslisohbetseslichatseslisohbet siteleriseslichat siteleri

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use