I guess the norm at Wikipedia is now that people who are rewarded with administratorship tend to be those who are not article writers and instead tend to be people unskilled labourers who just happen to stick around longer, and administrators are really the people who are running the show on Wikipedia.

So if these people are not really academics but just a bunch of unskilled labourers, how can they be the ones deciding the content disputes and conflicts if they don't even know what the dispute is, just that they are quick to put the banhammer down on whichever side the admin supports.

There are quite a few admins who are heavy content contributors, and many are...um...contributing content. I try to encourage anyone who does alot of content to run for adminship. I was never enamoured of the idea of "content editors" vs "admins" (or "arbs" for that matter) and am pleased when folks get mixed up in all different areas of the wikiCas

There are quite a few admins who are heavy content contributors, and many are...um...contributing content. I try to encourage anyone who does alot of content to run for adminship. I was never enamoured of the idea of "content editors" vs "admins" (or "arbs" for that matter) and am pleased when folks get mixed up in all different areas of the wikiCas

Some administrators not only add no content to Wikipedia, but block content contributors. So the question is, if you are you also pleased when bully administrators block content contributors for nothing,like in this case for exampleHow many bad blocks an admin should to make to be desysoped? How many times an admin should misuse her tools to be desysoped?

Your case is a special one. It looks like there was a community support for your unban , but GovCom decided against it. Or let's for example take a look at this user So far he has not came back after the ban, a ban that was made because the user was harassed by a dirty troll tarc, and responded to that harassment.Wikipedia is a strange place. It bans its best content contributors to satisfy the trolls, the trolls that are worse than just an empty space

Your case is a special one. It looks like there was a community support for your unban , but GovCom decided against it. Or let's for example take a look at this user So far he has not came back after the ban, a ban that was made because the user was harassed by a dirty troll tarc, and responded to that harassment.Wikipedia is a strange place. It bans its best content contributors to satisfy the trolls, the trolls that are worse than just an empty space

I wasn't talking about me. I was just teasing Casliber. It was an easy joke.