--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
should we react on this? Should we make xjed a replacement of jed? Should
we add a comment to the description of the xjed package?
=46rom: davis@space.mit.edu ("John E. Davis")
Newsgroups: local.mailinglist.jed
Subject: Re: XJed do not set XWINDOWS with -batch
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:03:29 -0400
Joerg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de> wrote:
>> Incidently, xjed does not "exec" jed when DISPLAY is not set. Rather,
>> xjed contains the same code as jed
>>Why? Is it so few?
It was written to reuse as much code as possible. As a result, Xjed =3D
jed + Xlib-specific code. The Xlib-specific code is used only when
the DISPLAY variable is set. In fact, if you have built and installed
Xjed, then the jed executable can probably be replaced by a shell script:
#!/bin/sh
unset DISPLAY
exec /usr/bin/xjed $*
I have not tested this though.
--John
=20
--------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to <jed-users-request@jedsoft.org> with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body.
Need help? Email <jed-users-owner@jedsoft.org>.
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBQrlzg4Z13Cz2nwVYAQKrLAf+I9eEbz5pVVd4qgNu1R7v4Yp74r0MKN6E
lX/nMtThtTKRx2kOG7CCbRIeqIkZqgm2OkiGo6x8vJ9ZJfk/F7Zg9Iyy9tetyJDs
lnt4LO+zGD8ldoK4h+28wbEvGRc+EhMgnaEDpjb8Jfn1ZSJyjOyICF3gcQ2w6ZX3
2pLYgKcOwpFf7HvxeY3x/cMe8VFwX4KBtrLyuRiMwMBmx/hXNKTgTjjHQ3Zi+i6R
3PH6491Jt1DC0LTxh3dbbKQWcs5Q14JfP5+cn3Q/14U/dyuwk21N73UGO+hIK2im
cxl4dfcGF52nj6UjBsfMrFxaTMLLqyrJwIFcF0uJRQV7n5Q46gHbog==
=Bdnl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--