A female elementary school teacher has been caught operating a hidden camera at a pool changing room, saying she “had an interest in the breasts of pretty girls,” although either because she is a woman or a teacher police and her school seem to have decided to let her get off with impunity.

The 24-year-old woman, a teacher at an elementary school in Tokyo’s Kunitachi city, had availed herself of the pool facilities at the Toshimaen amusement park in Nerima city in order to secretly install a camera in the female changing rooms there.

She was soon rumbled by a security guard who noted something suspicious and alerted police, who began an investigation.

They soon caught her, although for some mysterious reason reports omit to mention her being arrested.

She even admitted her crimes to police and school, pleading simple lust:

“I was interested in the breasts of pretty women, so I recorded them so I could watch them when I felt like it. It was inexcusable.”

Her school has apologised for employing a criminal pervert, but seems to omitted any mention of whether it will punish her:

“We think it is inexcusable that one of our staff has betrayed the trust of children and parents in this way.”

It has not escaped the attention of teacher-watchers that no mention made of her being arrested or charged, her name was not released, and the school did not specify what, if any, disciplinary action it took against her – a stark contrast to the arrest, public humiliation and sacking which would likely follow from a male or non-teacher undertaking the same course of action.

The real problem is not that itself is dangerous or anything, but there are 2 good reasons why it's a crime:

1. you violate the personal rights of others (nobody likes to be peeped on until he's a pervert himself), unless you get their permission it's a crime to even take photoes of people on the streets...

2. Perverts are mentally ill, so noone can predict if letting them peep could satisfy them forever. It could be like a drug addicts case where he needs even harder drugs over time, maybe this case of peeping could lead to rape if "just looking" isn't enough anymore.

So it's best to prevent to initial crime to prevent the onfollowing ones.

Not only did she get off scott free because she's a female herself I bet she had to do ALOT of sexual favors to men in high places just to keep it from being a really huge uproar. Even now she's probably sucking some administration leaders dick to keep her job.

Anon 7:57
Because a women looking at little girls or a teacher undertaking these kinds of actions is completly ok.
Are you an retard or something like that?

Her actions are just as harmfull and dangerous. She's doing the exact same thing and should be charged the same.
But apparently equality is just a one way road made up by a group to get more rights for themselves without giving up their coveted position.

Thank you for posting the correct information. I was going to post this myself. If I understood the internets you sir would win them all.

This is simply a double standard. Women are good, men are bad. Male sexuality is demonized because men must advance, men must take the risk, men penetrate, women are penetrated, the list of stupid reasons boil down to 'female victim mentality'. Biologically we cherish the eggs and protect them at all costs. Even if that permits the ruination of our society. When female sexuality is unchained society crumbles. Rome, has many lessons to teach us.

Of course, a lot of people posting here are from America. In America, men had rights for about 350 years, could vote for about 200 years, and women didn't start getting rights until about 100 years ago. Granted, most of those rights were largely theoretical for men who weren't white and wealthy for a large chunk of that time, but the fact remains that there was a huge gap and it tends to color Americans' attitudes on the subject.

1. Back then the vast majority had no rights. Even the whole "women weren't allowed to vote" is a hollow argument because for most of history neither were men.
In most countries the time between allowing males and females to vote boils down to 10-20 years.
So the whole "women were so mistreated" in the past thing is mostly ignoring a lot of nasty things men had to face aswell and positive things women had back then.

2. That said what happened in the past isn't important to anyone living today. Did any of the women alive nowaday live back in the medieval? NO!
Not a single one of them suffered from these "bad" things back then nor did a single guy profit from them.
It's another hollow argument to make one group feel bad and get what you want.
The only reason they get away with it is because people like you justify it and let them get away with it.