In response to who is the better receiver, they're completely different types, and I'd think it's fair to say that they're about even right now. Fitzgerald has more upside; he has the tools to become one of the best ever. I'll take him.

But Marques Colston is like a combination of both... the hands of Fitzgerald and the after catch ability of Boldin. :P

almost impossible to choose, both are really amazing a bring something different. I'll go with Boldin because im an FSU fan and he's been dominant before Fitz came along, and he is so fun to watch with the way he just punishes DB's.

So, the question is who is the better receiver and who would you rather have on your team.

Personally, I think Boldin is ahead of Fitzgerald by a long shot right now. More consistent and even though he is older he probably doesn't have much more experience as a wide receiver than Fitzgerald.

again; who is the better receiver and who would you rather have on your team.

Ill take Boldin. He seems to get better separation, Fitz uses his body and length to get to the ball but there is someone usually right on his back. Also impressive is that Boldin was doing this before Fitz got there.

I think that Fitzgerald does more for my team as a receiver, but Boldin would do more as a football player. Boldin is one of the best blockers at receiver in the NFL, even though he's overshadowed. He's also more dangerous after the catch.