Midel Jackson v. Salinas

July 5, 2011

MIDEL JACKSON, PLAINTIFF,v.SALINAS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

On May 16, 2011, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(c) requires a party to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition in response to a motion. Failure to oppose a motion to dismiss may be deemed a failure by plaintiff to prosecute his case and result in dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Therefore plaintiff will have a final opportunity in which to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action be pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.