Pages

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

THE REAL SUPERMAN RETURNS

MOVIE REVIEW:

MAN OF STEEL

By:

G.P. Manalo

Starring:

Henry Cavill

Amy Adams

Michael Shannon

Kevin Costner

Russell Crowe

After much anticipation, Man of Steel is a rather ambitious comic
book film as it re-introduces the Iconic superhero to the audience yet again in
a possible “Batman” approach (at first).
It has been years since Superman wowed critics, fans or casual movie-goers
in his cinematic form. It must be a challenge to bring back an Icon with a
stature like Superman with a big-screen re-telling that could become relevant
to a newer generation yet again; the conflicting fact about this is the fact
that it is taking a huge leap of it following the footsteps of Christopher
Nolan’s “The Dark Knight Trilogy”. Fortunately enough, Man of Steel is the
probably the best Superman movie since Superman II though that is not saying
that much but there was still that driving force me in me that I could’ve got a
little bit more from the movie.

Man of Steel – Is a reboot-retelling of the origin of the iconic superhero, Superman,
the last son of krypton. As the planet Krypton slowly die, Jor-El and his wife
Lara took their only child and sent him to earth who are meanwhile found by a
human couple, the Kents. As he grows up discovering his powers it conflicts him
in using those powers to help people who are not really ready for a savior like
him. He wanders the world in different names and occupations when that one job
leads him to a reunion with his real father and there he discovers his purpose
as well and now he is forced to face a threat to mankind named, General Zod and
his own Kryptonian army in a mission to destroy and re-create Krypton out of
Earth.

I welcomed Zack Snyder to direct this movie in open arms, sure he
made one bad movie but there is a possibility that he could do it again but I remain
optimistic about the choice directing this film, I was happy to know that this
was more of his “baby” than Nolan’s but there was still that great fear in me
when I heard that phrase. As much as I want to say that he is a great visual
director, I never thought that he was the kind of guy who would bring great
performances (Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, and Comedian were great but they’re 3/6
of the Watchmen who stood out in the film) in his movies. But I was happy to
know that he did live up, he was able to deliver a rather satisfying and
probably the best Superman movie we had since 1980.

Superman is not Batman, that’s for sure. I never really like the
comparison due to the film’s previews showcasing the fact that this new take on
Superman that is rather edgy, realistic and dark. Superman was never the edgy or emo type, even if
his life was a tragic one like Batman’s, Superman sees positivity out of it and
remains his moral fiber and the movie somewhat portrays both tones uniquely and
I didn’t expect that it’d go well. I also don’t like the word “Realistic”
around Superman, Superman is a god-like being who comes from another planet
with powers like shooting laser beams from his eyes, Ice breath, super strength
and flight, and invincibility not to mention his weakness is a rock with five
different colors (and a red sun). I don’t think realistic is the right word, if
we would go back to the tagline of “Superman: The Movie” it is told that you
“Will BELIEVE a man can fly”. Believe is the definitive word for Superman; make
me believe that his planet is more than just white crystals, make me believe
that there was some sort of progression as his powers develop, make me believe
that his weakness is a frickin’ rock, or maybe even that despite his
perfections he can still be a vulnerable man. In this movie, I did believe that
this man existed in that world; as a matter of fact they did tell a good and a
fresh enough take in telling the story of this character.

Henry Cavill closely embodies Superman/Clark Kent/Kal-El from his moral fiber
to his country boy personality better than Brandon Routh but unfortunately it
is in that level so far, we still have yet to see from him playing this
character especially when I’m going to say that he is in the level of
Christopher Reeves (or maybe yet, better than Christopher Reeves) though he
does closely embody the Superman we know through his mannerisms and personality
enough in this movie, like I said we have yet to see more from the actor
especially how they did set-up this character for the sequel. They brought out
an “interesting” take on Superman in this film. From the first half,
Kal-El/Clark Kent/Superman does seem to be that likable guy but when the second
act comes to play it felt like he was a different character, he did some
questionable things that purists or casual fans in general will be pissed off
about (not in a slap-in-the-face Mandarin way, don’t worry). I do like the story they tell for him in this movie where the focal point of the narrative is him finding his purpose in this world, and I thought that was handled very well in the film and the way it is built up from the first half.

Michael Shannon as General Zod is very under-used in this movie
and Michael Shannon is actually one of my favorite actors; he wasn’t really the
dastardly-cliched-campy villain that General Zod was in past incarnations (or super villains in general), here
he is more portrayed as this lawful-evil who just wants order for his planet
through his clouded ideas. As a “villain” I would compare him to 2009’s Star
Trek, Nero; like Nero he did some monumental things here and there but there
was never this emotional weight or impact on the character that much, you leave
the theater wanting more from the character (especially when it is from a very
talented actor), though for the material the actor was given he was still able to pull off a decent enough performance. But Antje Traue’s Faora was more of the villain you wanted Zod
to be in this movie, she was doing all the dirty work and she gets more blood
on her hands more than General Zod in this movie. Her performance was also
great in this movie; hopefully I’ll see more films from the actress soon.

Amy Adams’s version of Lois Lane is an interesting one, she’s not
the typical “damsel in distress” type in this movie, and she was more relevant
and involved around the situations in this film and I’m glad that they actually made
her a stronger female character in this film, though Amy Adams' performance is a mix between almost bland and decent at the same time (hope that makes sense at least). Lastly, the two fathers: Kevin
Conroy’s Pa Kent and Russell Crowe’s Jor-El were easily the best things happen in the
movie. Both of them pulled off an surprisingly exceptional performance in this movie and it
is probably the best version of those characters in a live action incarnation by far as they bring so much emotional weight throughout the movie.

The movie surprisingly showed you more of Krypton in this movie
for the first 20 minutes of the movie, I love how they showed Krypton as an actual functional world from showing you the culture, some back-story, and even the
inhabitants of the planet, but when you do go to earth it immediately cuts to
Kal-El being an adult and his early life acts as cliff notes in the movie as it
is featured through a series of flashbacks. It was clever for the few
flashbacks in this movie but then there were more and more flashbacks coming in
and you end up wishing that most of those flashbacks could;ve been combined together in the first hour or so to build up Superman more as a
character in the movie, the final cut was satisfying (at some degree) anyways. The storytelling is not as complex as I thought it would be, to the film's credit the movie is actually linear and simply told.

Zack Snyder is a great visual director and he has shown that in
his past movies (he even makes owls fighting look cool in 3D). The first and second half was this emotional uprising of the character and then the third act of the movie was this huge and fast paced-adrenaline filled action set-pieces. this movie is
action packed, In fact this is the most action-packed Superman film by far. The fight scenes in this movie are insane
and I was very happy to see Superman punch something in this movie. As much as
I enjoyed the third act of the movie, I just wished the movie had room to
breathe. The movie didn’t really stop for a break to build something up and
when it did it is faster than a speeding bullet (see what I did there?). There
was an unnecessary scene in the climax of the movie and I wished that scene
could’ve been better if they were to keep that scene alone in the movie. The action scenes are incredible nonetheless especially that final fight between Zod and Superman where it is in a Transformers-esque scale (don't worry you can tell what's going on).

Lastly, Hans Zimmer's score is brilliant as always. Is it in the level of the original score? not really, which is quite a challenge to build a theme as iconic as the original. it's like what my friend said about Zimmer's difficulty in making a score "It's like God told a man to build a mountain and he gives you pebbles to build one". The score somewhat has that prevailing-glorious feel to the score and most of the time the music would catch the emotional state of the scene.

In the end, Man of Steel is definitely a great superhero popcorn action
flick. It is the best Superman movie we have since Superman II; I highly
recommend you see this immediately in the theaters. Though it may not be the
Superman movie where it is a deep and emotionally driven Superman flick, it is
enough to be so. But It is the most action-packed Superman film in this movie,
it explores to many things where you think they won’t explore throughout this
movie. It is an interesting version of Superman that does take center stage in
this movie. There was also some stand out performances coming from Russell
Crowe and Kevin Costner while the rest still do a great job in this film. I
enjoyed this movie very much for what it is and I was very happy to see
Superman again gracing our theaters in his glory once again, because the last
time I saw him on theaters. He almost put me to sleep.