Its design, sometimes its not meant to be easily read, thats the whole thing with design, If i wanted it to be easily read, i would have used times roman and just wrote it, but that would boring, I'm trying to make it interesting, which can sometime mean its difficult to read, but thats what i love about it, sometimes you just have to think a little, and the piece isn't representing anything, or is a logotype, so its doesn't defeat the purpose of anything? but thanks for the feedback, appreciate it

Its design, sometimes its not meant to be easily read, thats the whole thing with design, If i wanted it to be easily read, i would have used times roman and just wrote it, but that would boring, I'm trying to make it interesting, which can sometime mean its difficult to read, but thats what i love about it, sometimes you just have to think a little, and the piece isn't representing anything, or is a logotype, so its doesn't defeat the purpose of anything? but thanks for the feedback, appreciate it

I like the updated version more. It has a more natural feel to it. Like its a vine growing around the word randomly or naturally.

I don't understand how not being able to read it means its a bad design. Its purposely made to be creative and interesting. I wish Royds didn't tell people what it reads because it will be up to people to perceive for them selves what it means. If that makes sense? I find it more interesting to look at if i don't know what it is MEANT to mean, i'd rather have my own interpretation of what it is.