Person of Interest in Vegas Massacre Kills Daughter Then Self

While it is true a John Beilmans home was searched by the FBI and a day or so later he killed himself and his disabled daughter, I can find no
evidence that he is connected to Stephen Paddock. This could be legitimately fake news or misinformation. It is interesting enough to research
more.

There is no way professional assassins are sloppy enough to shoot him in the back of the head when faking a suicide..

Anytime it's pointed out that the government that's "good enough" to stage an attack like this probably isn't "bad enough" to muck up a pretty obvious
detail like shooting somebody in the back of the head with a shotgun and saying it's suicide, the response is always "they're just rubbing it in our
faces."

Unfortunately, pointing things out like you did doesn't really get anywhere.

I did more research, and this definitely smells like disinformation. I wouldn’t buy it. There are no credible sources for many of the “facts”
outlined in the article, although the author has worked some true information into the article to make it sound authentic.

I tracked down a few other articles saying what the article in the O.P. said, and they pointed to sources in the Kremlin. That’s another red flag.

I would share the link I found, which looks like Russian propaganda and references sources in the Kremlin, but there is a graphic picture of Stephen
Paddock's head on the link - which is something I *was* looking for, to verify that he was shot in the back of his head. I don't think he was. It
looks to me like he stuck the gun in his mouth and fired, as there are no exit wounds on his face, and there is blood coming out of his mouth.

At any rate, I would be wary, as it seems like the original source of this information is the "Kremlin" - to me, this seems like another Russian
disinformation campaign.

Here is an excerpt:

A stunning new Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that based on documented evidence developed with
the aid of both Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Israel’s Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations (MOSSAD), the identity
of the person named responsible for the “Pyramid Sacrifice” ritualistic massacre in Las Vegas, named Stephen Paddock, has established his being an
arms smuggling pilot employed by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)—with further evidence being developed that the weapons and ammunition used in
this massacre were likely stolen from an Israeli arms depot sometime during the past fortnight. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes
in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

I would share the link I found, which looks like Russian propaganda, but there is a graphic picture of Stephen Paddock's head on the
link - which is something I *was* looking for, to verify that he was shot in the back of his head.

But no-one has ever claimed Paddock was shot in the back of the head, have they? I think you have Paddock and Beilman mixed up in your previous post.
Or at least, that's the only way I can make sense of it.

I've been reading a lot of posts by people (I don't remember if they were on ATS or not) saying that Paddock was shot in the back of the head, and
that this was evidence that someone else shot him. I don't think this is true.

I would share the link I found, which looks like Russian propaganda and references sources in the Kremlin, but there is a graphic picture of Stephen
Paddock's head on the link - which is something I *was* looking for, to verify that he was shot in the back of his head. I don't think he was. It
looks to me like he stuck the gun in his mouth and fired, as there are no exit wounds on his face, and there is blood coming out of his mouth.

At any rate, I would be wary, as it seems like the original source of this information is the "Kremlin" - to me, this seems like another Russian
disinformation campaign.

So are you suggesting that the Russians photoshopped that picture or are you admitting that the Russians have access to information that we don't?

The picture is probably available to the public, but not publicized due to its graphic nature. According to the article that I didn't link to because
of the graphic content, Russian intelligence knows quite a lot about the shooting and thinks it was related to the CIA.

However, I think this is bogus. My logic is based on Russia's track record of seeding disinformation and leading on conspiracy theorists.

Where other than the article in the OP does anyone say anything about a charger found at Paddock's being connected to this dude? As far as I can tell
the details on why his house was raided haven't been released yet.

I remember an official report from the police saying that they had found a charger in Paddock's room that was not related to him, although I have yet
to see proof that it was related to this guy.

For anyone who is interested, this conspiracy theory that Paddock was a CIA operative does explain how he got so much money and sheds some light on
his motives. I do find it interesting, but I am cautious because it is well known that there are a lot of people out there, including, but not limited
to, Russian operatives that are actively trying to confuse Americans with disinformation.

originally posted by: darkbake
While it is true a John Beilmans home was searched by the FBI and a day or so later he killed himself and his disabled daughter, I can find no
evidence that he is connected to Stephen Paddock. This could be legitimately fake news or misinformation. It is interesting enough to research
more.

The TV news, New 8 Rochester channel report says, (according to police) that the FBI did visit the home the day before the killing...nobody knows why
as yet, not are likely to.
The other piece of information is that a John Beilman, Rochester, NY was an engineer who worked on battery systems at Ultralife Corporation, and
currently with GM. It may not be the same man though, and there are quite a few with that name.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.