> I checked it, and it seems to work in IE6, 5.5, 5 and even 4.
> - - there does *not* seem to be a problem with the "for"
> attribute.
>
> So, again...am I missing something here? Do the problems describes by
> Jukka appear under IE/Mac, maybe?

No, I've actually never seen IE on Mac.

It seems that I have messed things up when writing on the basis of what I
remember from my old experiments. You are right, IE supports the "for"
attribute in the sense that it associates the label with the field.