News & Multimedia

Mrs. Caal has taken her case to the courts, but not in Guatemala, where Mayan villagers like her, illiterate and living in isolated areas, have had little legal success. She has filed in Canada, where her negligence suit, Caal v. Hudbay Mineral Inc., has sent shivers through the vast Canadian mining, oil and gas industry.

Liberal MP John McKay is calling for stricter oversight of Canadian mining companies abroad as plaintiffs increasingly look to Canadian courts to seek justice. He says the government needs to do more because Canadian companies operating internationally continue to be accused of violating local laws and human rights, despite overall improvements in the industry.

In their unyielding pursuit for justice and accountability, Indigenous Peoples are presently pursuing at least three of these companies in Canada’s court system. Foremost among them is Hudbay Minerals.

The three lawsuits against HudBay Minerals can continue through the Canadian courts. This would have been unheard of in the past, and, although the case it still to proceed, the initial ruling has opened the door to similar cases.

Adolfo Ich was killed because he didn’t want Canadian mining companies to exploit his indigenous village in Guatemala, his wife claims. The school teacher and father of five was reportedly shot in 2009 while protesting outside a mine owned by Canadian mining giant HudBay Minerals.

The rising potential of human rights cases and securities class actions… show that if a company pays lip service to corporate social responsibility, it does so at its peril. . . . mining companies are also under an increasing risk of private lawsuits. There are at least three of these cases before the courts, and all are at relatively early stages. Toronto-based Hudbay Minerals Inc. has been sued in Ontario on allegations that security personal assaulted women at its mine in Guatemala.

A precedent-setting Ontario Superior Court decision in 2013 allowed a lawsuit against Hudbay Minerals Inc. to proceed to trial in Ontario. The lawsuit represents a number of Guatemalan plaintiffs over alleged human rights violations at Hudbay’s Guatemalan mining project.

“That one has really sparked a lot of legal interest, because it is the first time [a case of this type] is going to be allowed to be heard in Canada when the actual events did not happen in Canada,” Collenette said.

Two recent lawsuits brought in British Columbia by foreign plaintiffs against two Canadian mining companies for alleged human rights abuses abroad have raised the stakes for mining projects in foreign jurisdictions.

These lawsuits appear to be inspired by the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on July 22, 2013 in Choc v Hudbay Minerals Inc, the first case against a Canadian mining company over alleged human rights abuse abroad that was permitted to go to trial in Canada.

From the sleek glass towers of Toronto’s financial district, it’s a cab trip, at least one flight, a seven-hour drive from Guatemala City, another drive up a dirt road in a pickup truck, and finally a four-hour hike to reach the remote community of Lote Ocho in eastern Guatemala. The tiny village couldn’t be farther from the corporate boardrooms of Canadian companies, and yet these two worlds will soon collide, with a precedent-setting lawsuit that could leave Canadian corporations more accountable for their actions abroad.

It was once believed that as separate legal entities, a Canadian parent company was distinct and therefore legally immune from the actions of its foreign subsidiary or contractors. Or so goes the legal reasoning if you believe the “corporate veil” insulates the parent from any liabilities that attach to its subsidiaries abroad. But plaintiff lawyers have developed a work around that appears to be putting Canadian parent companies on the hot seat. Lawyers expect more such cases.

Guatemalan Mayan plaintiffs involved with litigation against Hudbay Minerals in Ontario, on Thursday filed a jury notice choosing a trial by jury that could potentially hold the company liable in Canada for alleged sexual assault, murder and shootings at a mining project formerly owned by its Guatemala subsidiary.

A civil trial in Ontario involving a Canadian mining company being sued over alleged shootings and gang rapes at a project in Guatemala will proceed with a jury, the law firm representing the plaintiffs said Thursday.

When an Ontario court ruled against HudBay Minerals Inc. in a human rights case in July, it sent shockwaves across the Canadian mining and legal communities. Months later, lawyers remain far from certain what kind of long-term impact the decision will have.

Last week the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a path-breaking decision, Choc v. Hudbay Minerals, that might, for the first time, require a Canadian mining company to take legal responsibility for human rights abuses abroad.

On Monday, Ontario Superior Court Justice Carole Brown ruled that claims for rapes and murder in Guatemala against Canadian mining company HudBay Minerals can proceed to trial in Canada. This precedent-setting decision puts Canadian companies on notice that they will have to be much more vigilant about their actions overseas.

Three lawsuits against a Canadian mining company over alleged shootings and gang rapes at a Guatemalan project will be allowed to proceed in Canada following a ruling that makes it possible for firms to face liability at home for incidents that occur overseas.

Canadian mining company HudBay Minerals Inc. can potentially be held liable for alleged violence at a Guatemalan mine owned by a subsidiary, an Ontario Superior Court judge has ruled, in what plaintiffs say is a precedent-setting case.

[W]ith the world’s mining industry looking on this week at the annual Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada conference, HudBay is also the subject of a precedent-setting court case regarding alleged human rights abuses at a mining property in Guatemala that HudBay once owned.

As the widow of a slain Mayan community leader looked on, lawyers clashed in a Toronto courtroom on Tuesday over whether a Canadian mining company, HudBay Minerals Inc., can be held liable for alleged violence at a Guatemalan mine owned by a subsidiary…. ‘We’ve come in search of justice,’ [Angelica] Choc said in an interview through a translator.

The human-rights group was granted intervenor status by a judge in order to weigh in on three lawsuits launched by a group of Guatemalans against Toronto-based HudBay Minerals Inc. in Ontario Superior Court over alleged human-rights abuses that date back to 2009.

This year, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada convention, which draws tens of thousands of delegates and a handful of politicians, among others, coincides with a court case that many in the mining industry are watching closely…. A Canadian court is the right place for this case, not only because Guatemala’s justice system, in the words of Human Rights Watch, is ‘weak and corrupt’ but also because mining is so important to Canada, as the PDAC convention illustrates. Whatever the outcome of the case, it is important that it be heard in Canada where it will get a fair hearing.

For the first time a lawsuit against a Canadian mining company over alleged human rights abuses abroad will be heard in Canadian courts…. A week ago, just before an Ontario court was set to determine the issue, HudBay abandoned its legal argument that the lawsuit should not be heard in Canada.

“I think it’s a stunning victory for human rights. I think it’s historic,’ Klippenstein said, adding the location issue was argued by the company for more than a year. ‘It should send shockwaves through the boardrooms throughout Canada”.

Lawyers acting for Guatemalan residents who have filed a flurry of lawsuits against HudBay Minerals Inc. (TSX: T.HBM, Stock Forum) alleging abuses of human rights, will have their allegations heard in Canadian courts…. “This is a stunning victory for human rights […]” said Murray Klipperstein, a lawyer acting for a Guatemalan villagers, who have filed three lawsuits in the Ontario Superior Court.

Every day they’ve walked together, in borrowed hats and coats, making their way down cold Toronto streets … as one by one they’ve taken turns going into a Bay Street tower to tell their story and have it challenged….The fact the plaintiffs are here and speaking publicly is extraordinary…

Believed to be the first time people from another country, accusing a Canadian mining corporation of human rights violations, have come to Canada to tell their story …. Similar cases have never made it very far in Canadian courts.

In Guatemala, victims of human rights abuses involving Canadian mining companies are left to pick up the pieces. At home in Canada, company lawyers skirt around questions of accountability, and justice ultimately falls through the cracks.

[T]he anti mining forces are fighting back in a new way. Guatemalans are launching law suits in Canadian courts against Canadian mining companies.

The latest is a multi million dollar claim against Hud Bay Minerals filed by 11 Mayan women allegedly raped when they were cleared off the land 4 years ago. The law suits are a new tactic in an old war – a war over land: – the government and the mining companies on one side, the Mayans and human rights workers on the other.

A Toronto law firm is pushing for lawsuits against Canadian mining company HudBay Minerals Inc. regarding alleged human rights abuses to continue despite the fact the company no longer owns the project where the alleged killing of one man and gang rape of 11 women occurred.”

“We believe this sale was prompted in part by the severe human rights issues at HudBay’s Fenix project that dogged the company at every turn,” said Murray Klippenstein, a lawyer representing one of the victims.

“Toronto-based HudBay Minerals Inc. said Tuesday that it will investigate allegations that security personnel, along with members of the police and military, attacked and gang-raped several women in 2007 during efforts to clear people from lands near a mining project in Guatemala.”

“The trial of a Guatemalan woman who is suing Canadian miner HudBay Minerals for C$12-million in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for the death of her husband in 2009 is “probably years away” Angelica Choc ’s lawyer said on Thursday.”

“The lawyer is Canadian, and so is the company. But in a civil suit announced today, the allegations are of actions committed in Guatemala. That’s where HudBay Minerals Inc. and its subsidiaries operate a nickel-mining project.”

A short documentary depicting the forced evictions that occurred in the municipality of El Estor in early 2007. The evictions were requested by Skye Resources, a company that is now part of HudBay Minerals.