nmm 22 4500ICPSR08079MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08079MiAaIMiAaI
The 1974-1979-1980 Canadian National Elections and Quebec Referendum Panel Study
[electronic resource]
Harold Clarke
,
Jane Jenson
,
Lawrence LeDuc
,
Jon Pammett
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8079NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is a continuation of the 1974 Canadian Election
Study, which consisted of extensive personal interviews with a
national sample of 2,562 respondents following the federal election of
July 8, 1974. Immediately following the federal election of May 22,
1979, 1,295 of the original respondents were successfully contacted
and interviewed, thereby creating a 1974-1979 panel study. In
addition, a new national sample of the l979 electorate and a
supplementary sample of young voters (aged 18-23) were drawn and
personal interviews utilizing the same questionnaire were conducted
with respondents in these samples. After the federal election of
February 18, 1980, 1,748 respondents in both the panel and
cross-section samples were contacted by telephone and
reinterviewed. No new respondents were added to the 1980 sample. When
the Quebec referendum was called for May 20, 1980, a decision was made
to contact by telephone Quebec respondents originally sampled in l974
or 1979 and interviewed in 1980. Of these respondents, 325 were
successfully contacted and reinterviewed. Approximately half of the
interviews were conducted immediately prior to the referendum, and the
remaining half immediately afterward. The 1974 post-election survey
covered a wide range of topics related to citizen participation in
politics. The 1979 survey continued the theme of citizen interest and
involvement in politics and probed respondents' attitudes about
regions, provinces, and national unity. The 1980 telephone interview
asked about vote choice in 1980, party identification, and the issue
of energy. Questions on the Quebec referendum centered around the
respondents' views on constitutional options for Quebec.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08079.v2
bilingualismicpsrcampaign issuesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrelectionsicpsrnational unityicpsroccupational statusicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical leadersicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrseparatismicpsrTrudeau, Pierreicpsrunion membershipicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrvoter interesticpsrvotersicpsrnational identityicpsrenergy policyicpsrethnicityicpsrfamily historyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrnational electionsicpsrIDRC IV. Environmental DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesClarke, HaroldJenson, JaneLeDuc, LawrencePammett, JonInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8079Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08079.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04665MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04665MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News 9/11 Anniversary Poll, September 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2008-01-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4665NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, conducted September 5-7, 2006, is
a part of a continuing series of monthly polls that solicit public
opinion on the presidency and on a range of political and social
issues. The focus of this poll was the fifth anniversary of the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Respondents were asked whether
they approved of the way President George W. Bush was handling the
presidency and issues such as the campaign against terrorism and the
situation in Iraq. Information was collected on how closely
respondents were following the upcoming congressional and
gubernatorial election, whether they would vote for a Democratic or
Republican candidate if the election for the United States House of
Representatives were being held that day, and the single most
important issue in their vote for Congress members. Other questions
asked which political party they trusted to do a better job handling
the main problems the nation would face over the next few years, and
whether they approved of the way Congress and their own representative
to the United States House of Representatives were handling their
jobs. Views were also sought on the war in Iraq and Donald Rumsfield's
handling of his job as Secretary of Defense. Respondents were asked
how well they thought the campaign against terrorism was going,
whether the country was safer from terrorism compared to before
September 11, 2001, and whether Osama bin Laden would have to be
captured or killed for the war on terrorism to be a success.
Information was collected about the impact of the September 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks on respondents' lives, how concerned they were about
the possibility of more major terrorist attacks in the United States,
how much confidence they had in the government's ability to prevent
another major terrorist attack, whether the federal government was
intruding on the privacy rights of Americans in its investigation of
possible terrorist attacks, and whether this intrusion was
justified. Additional topics addressed the religion of Islam, new
airport security measures, and how proud they felt to be an
American. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education
level, household income, voter registration and participation history,
political party affiliation, political philosophy, employment status,
marital status, and type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04665.v2
United States Congressicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrworryicpsrprivacyicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrRumsfield, DonaldicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrsocial issuesicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist attackicpsrterrorist threatsicpsranxietyicpsrattitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrfederal governmenticpsrIraq WaricpsrIslamicpsrnational prideicpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4665Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04665.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03851MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03851MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News Clinton Credibility Poll, August 1994
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2007-03-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3851NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, conducted August 16, 1994, was
undertaken to assess public opinion of President Bill Clinton, his
presidency, and his administration. Respondents were queried on
whether they approved of his performance as president, whether they
felt that his administration had begun to alter the political
atmosphere that hindered progress, whether they trusted Democrats or
Republicans to better handle the problems the nation was facing,
whether President Clinton's proposed changes were right for the
country, whether they were satisfied with President Clinton's honesty
and integrity, how much they felt President Clinton had accomplished
during his presidency, and whether, based on his performance so far,
he deserved a second term as president. Opinions were solicited on
Bill Clinton's strength as a leader, his vision for the country, his
effectiveness, and trustworthiness. Additional opinions were gathered
on whether President Clinton or congressional Republicans were more
responsible for the successes during his presidency, whether
President Clinton made more or fewer mistakes than usual as
president, whether he was able to deal with the nation's problems,
and whether the media treated him fairly. Background information
includes education, ethnicity, political orientation, sex, and year
of birth.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03851.v1
Clinton, BillicpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsrUnited States Congressicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential administrationsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3851Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03851.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03850MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03850MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News "Good Morning America" Health Care Poll, July 1994
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2006-12-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3850NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, fielded July 14-17, 1994, was
undertaken to assess respondents' views of health care in the United
States and proposed changes to the health care system. Respondents
were asked to name the most important issue facing President Bill
Clinton and the United States Congress, to give an assessment of
President Clinton's proposed health care plan, to rate their level of
knowledge of the proposed plan, whether they felt they would pay
more, less, or the same costs under the proposed plan, and whether
the quality of health care would improve, worsen, or stay the same
under the proposed plan. Opinions were gathered on the state of the
health care system, the most important goal for the health care
system, whether it was more important to lower health care costs or
to have guaranteed health care available to all, and whether basic
insurance should cover abortion. Respondents were queried on whether
they had health care coverage, whether they were on Medicare, their
level of satisfaction with the quality, costs, and system of health
care, whether they worried that their health care costs would not be
taken care of in the future, whether they approved or disapproved of
proposed health care changes, and whether individuals and groups like
the American Medical Association, Hillary Clinton, hospitals, and
political parties helped or hurt efforts to improve the health care
system. Background variables include sex, year of birth, education,
ethnicity, political orientation, employment status, and gross
household income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03850.v1
abortionicpsrClinton, BillicpsrClinton, Hillaryicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care costsicpsrhealth care reformicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrinsurance coverageicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3850Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03850.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02171MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02171MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News Media Poll, January 1997
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2008-08-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR2171NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, conducted January 6-7, 1997, sought respondents' views on national and local media practices. Respondents were asked to rate the ethics and honesty of television and print news media, as well as of politicians, corporations, average Americans, and the Clinton Administration. Those polled were asked whether they approved of the way national network television and local television stations reported the news, and whether the news media cared more about the accuracy of a story or being the first to report it. Views were also sought on the media's treatment of politicians, various socioeconomic classes, religious and political groups, celebrities, the military, the police, the government, and corporations. Respondents also rated their enjoyment of news reports on celebrities and politicians, and commented on the relevance of news stories to their lives. Additional topics covered the influence of network television news on viewers, the benefits and drawbacks of investigative news reporting, the media's respect or disrespect of privacy, the power of the media to limit political corruption and unfair business practices, and how often respondents watched television evening news programs. Demographic variables included sex, race, age, education level, household income, employment status, political party affiliation, political philosophy, and type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02171.v3
attitudesicpsrmedia influenceicpsrnews mediaicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpoliticiansicpsrprivacyicpsrpublic figuresicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtelevision newsicpsrbusinessesicpsrcelebritiesicpsrcitizensicpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsrethicsicpsrgovernmenticpsrmass mediaicpsrmedia coverageicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2171Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02171.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02490MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02490MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News "Nightline" GOP Strategy Poll, May 1998
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2009-10-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR2490NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll sought respondents' views on the
presidency and on the GOP (Republican Party), specifically in regard
to the actions of Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. Respondents
were asked to give their opinions of President Bill Clinton, Gingrich,
and the United States Congress, and to compare Clinton and Gingrich in
the areas of honesty, personal moral and ethical standards, and the
ability to understand the problems of the American people.
Respondents were asked whether they believed Gingrich's charge of a
White House cover-up of Clinton wrongdoing, including possible
lawbreaking, and what motivated Gingrich to make such allegations.
The results of the poll were announced on the ABC television program
"Nightline." Background information on respondents includes sex,
political party, political orientation, and impression of the
conservative Christian political movement.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02490.v2
public opinionicpsrClinton, BillicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrUnited States CongressicpsrethicsicpsrGingrich, Newticpsrgovernment performanceicpsrleadershipicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpresidencyicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2490Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02490.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09561MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09561MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News Poll, November 1990
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2007-07-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9561NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
monthly surveys that evaluate the Bush presidency and solicit
opinions on a variety of political and social issues. Topics covered
include approval ratings for public officials (George Bush, Congress,
the respondent's representative in Congress, Democrats, and
Republicans) on the issues of job performance, handling of the
economy, and handling of the situation caused by Iraq's invasion of
Kuwait, the budget deficit reduction plan (and the income group that
would be most affected by it), and the income group that Bush,
Democrats, and Republicans cared most about. Respondents also were
asked how important various political issues were to their vote
choice on election day, if they planned to vote in the upcoming
general election, for which party they would vote, and whether they
would vote to re-elect their own representative. Other questions
focusing on the situation in the Persian Gulf addressed the issues of
the use of military force if necessary to ensure Iraq's withdrawal
from Kuwait, long-term military presence of the United States in the
Gulf region, the use of military force should the economic embargo
prove unsuccessful, the likelihood that the United States would go to
war with Iraq, and Americans and other foreigners being held hostage
by Iraq. Background information provided includes political
alignment, registered voter status, 1988 presidential and
congressional vote choices, education, age, race, income, sex, and
state/region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09561.v1
approval ratingsicpsrBush Administration (1989-1993)icpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrUnited States Congressicpsrcongressional candidatesicpsrcongressional votingicpsreconomic policyicpsrFederal budget deficiticpsrforeign policyicpsrhostagesicpsrmilitary interventionsicpsrmilitary operationsicpsrnational economyicpsrparty identificationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsanctionsicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9561Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09561.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03854MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03854MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News Poll, September 1994
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2006-11-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3854NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Questions included the respondent's
opinion on what the most important problem facing the United States
was and approval ratings for President Clinton's handling of the
presidency, the economy, foreign affairs, crime, and health care.
Approval ratings were also tallied for the United States Congress and
the Democrats and Republicans in Congress. Respondents were asked how
much Congress had accomplished in the past year compared to years
before and who was responsible (i.e., President Clinton or the
parties in Congress). Respondents were asked if they believed certain
political figures, including President Clinton, Senate Majority
Leader Bob Dole, and the respondent's representative in Congress,
were doing what was best for the country, their district, or their
own political lives. Those polled were asked what they believed their
representative in Congress should or should not be doing, and which
political party was better at handling issues such as the economy and
helping the middle class. Queries included the general functioning of
the federal government and what, if any, changes were needed.
Respondent opinions on the crime bill were gathered, as well as
approval ratings on Congress's handling of the health care system.
Other questions concerning health care included whether the
respondent supported proposed changes to the health care system and
whether the respondent believed that significant improvements would
be made to the health care system. Respondents were also queried on
what changes they would like to see in Congress -- for example,
whether they would vote for their incumbent representative or the
challenger. Respondents were asked if they believed that America's
vital interests were at stake in the situation in Cuba and/or in
Haiti and whether the United States should end its economic embargo
against Cuba if certain conditions were met. Questions also solicited
respondent views on whether they would support a military invasion of
Haiti and if they believed that the United States would go to war
with Haiti. Respondents' knowledge of bills passed in Congress within
the past year was also assessed. Demographic information gathered
includes political affiliation, voter registration status, voting
record, political philosophy, level of education, religious
preference, urban or rural residence, marital status, labor union
status, working status, ethnicity, age, sex, yearly income, and
willingness for call-back.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03854.v1
Clinton, BillicpsrcrimeicpsrDole, Bobicpsrforeign affairsicpsrhealth careicpsrmilitary interventionicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3854Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03854.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06682MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06682MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News Powell "No Go" Poll, November 1995
[electronic resource]
ABC News
1998-05-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6682NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll sought respondents' views on the
1996 presidential election, specifically on retired General Colin
Powell's decision not to run for election. Given a ballot that offered
President Bill Clinton, Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Senate
Majority Leader Bob Dole, and Colin Powell as candidates for the
presidency, respondents were asked to identify for whom they would
vote. Those queried were asked for their opinions regarding Powell's
decision not to run for election, the power and role of a Powell
endorsement of another candidate, and whether Powell made the right
decision. Additional topics covered the Republican primaries and the
possibility of a third-party candidate. Demographic variables include
sex, race, political party, political orientation, and voter
registration history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06682.v1
Clinton, BillicpsrDole, BobicpsrGingrich, Newticpsrpolitical partiesicpsrPowell, Colinicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrprimariesicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrthird partiesicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrUnited StatesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6682Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06682.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03871MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03871MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News Pre-Election Poll, November 1994
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2006-11-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3871NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, conducted November 3-6, 1994, was
undertaken to assess public opinion prior to election day.
Respondents were polled on President Bill Clinton's handling of the
presidency, their satisfaction with the way the federal government
worked, whether the Democrats or the Republicans would do a better
job dealing with the main problems facing the country, and the
condition of the national economy. Questions regarding the upcoming
United States House of Representatives election asked respondents how
closely they were following it, the likelihood that they would vote,
whether they would vote for the Democratic or Republican candidate,
whether they planned to re-elect their own representative in
Congress, and how often they voted in state elections when there was
no presidential race. Background variables include sex, age,
ethnicity, education, household income, political party affiliation,
and voter participation and registration history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03871.v1
United States Congressicpsrvoting behavioricpsrClinton, Billicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrfederal governmenticpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrstate electionsicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3871Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03871.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03768MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03768MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News Pre-Election Poll, November 2002
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2003-10-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3768NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, conducted October 31, 2002, was
undertaken to assess respondents' views prior to the November 2002
elections. Respondents were asked about their past voting history, the
likelihood that they would vote in the November 2002 elections, and
their political party preference. Respondents were also asked to give
their opinions on how President George W. Bush and his administration
were handling the following: the war on terrorism, Social Security,
the economy, health care, prescription drug benefits, and the war with
Iraq. They were asked whether these issues affected their voting
selections and if so, in what way. Opinions of President George
W. Bush, his effectiveness as a leader, and his effect on the November
2002 elections were solicited. In addition, respondents asked about
what the priorities of the nation should be, the current state of the
national economy, and their personal financial situation. Background
information includes age, education, ethnicity, household income, sex,
religious orientation, political orientation, and whether the
respondent lived in an urban, suburban, or rural area.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03768.v1
Bush, George W.icpsrpublic opinionicpsrSocial Securityicpsrterrorismicpsrvoting behavioricpsrcounterterrorismicpsrhealth careicpsrnational economyicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrprescription drugsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3768Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03768.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04320MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04320MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News Terri Schiavo Poll, March 2005
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2006-06-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4320NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll was conducted in response to the controversy
regarding the cessation of life support for Florida resident Terri
Schiavo. Respondents were asked whether or not they had been following
the case and if they supported or opposed the decision to remove the
feeding tube. They were also asked if federal courts should be
involved in this case, if Congress should get involved in similar
cases, and whether politicians were more concerned for Schiavo or for
gaining political advantage. The survey also contained questions about
whether respondents would want to be kept alive if in a similar
situation, if the case caused them to have discussions with friends
and family regarding their wishes, and if any friends or family had
passed away after terminating life support. Other information
collected included political party affiliation, political philosophy,
religious affiliation, and gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04320.v1
federal courtsicpsrlawicpsrlife support systemsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical philosophyicpsrpoliticiansicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrSchiavo, Terriicpsrstate courtsicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4320Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04320.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03943MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03943MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post 2004 Voters Poll, October 2003
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2004-04-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3943NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
andidate Ralph Nader, or Reform Party
candidate Pat Buchanan), and if a household member was in military
service, a military veteran, a reservist, or belonged to a labor union.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03943.v1
Bush, George W.icpsrKucinich, DennisicpsrLieberman, JoeicpsrMoseley Braun, Carolicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrcampaign issuesicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvotersicpsrClark, WesleyicpsrDean, HowardicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrEdwards, JohnicpsrGephardt, DickicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, JohnicpsrTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3943Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03943.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08638MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1988 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08638MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Congressional District Poll, 1986
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1988ICPSR8638NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
In this study of voting practices and preferences
respondents were asked: if they voted in the last election, who they
voted for, if they were planning to vote in the upcoming election for
the House of Representatives, and who they were likely to vote for in
that election. They were asked to rate Reagan's performance as
president on issues such as the economy, foreign affairs, and aid to
the poor. They were also questioned about which political party they
generally support and what they believe to be the nation's worst
problem. Respondents to the follow-up questionnaire were again asked
who they would be voting for as well as whether they perceived the
state of the economy as getting better or worse. Demographic
characteristics were also recorded.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08638.v1
congressional districtsicpsrcongressional electionsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign affairsicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpoverty programsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrReagan, Ronaldicpsrvoter preferenceicpsrvotersicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8638Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08638.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06020MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06020MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Election Poll #2, October 1992
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2006-11-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR6020NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This election poll focuses primarily on public perceptions
of the 1992 presidential campaign. Respondents were queried
concerning the likelihood of their voting in the election, their vote
intentions, the strength of their support for a preferred candidate,
the possibility of changing to support a different candidate before
the election, the candidate the respondent might change to, and the
respondent's level of satisfaction regarding his/her choice for
president. A major portion of the survey evaluated the 1992 campaign
in terms of whether, in comparison with other recent presidential
campaigns, it had dealt with the biggest problems facing the country,
whether issues that the respondent really cared about had been
addressed, and whether the campaign had been more positive or
negative than past presidential campaigns. Presidential candidates
were evaluated along a similar line of questioning. Those surveyed
were also asked to describe their level of worry in response to a
variety of issues including pollution and environmental problems, the
Republicans or Democrats having too much political power, the
American education system getting worse, and the federal government
running out of money, and to indicate whether these issues had
received enough attention during the campaign. In addition,
respondents were asked about the helpfulness of the presidential
debates in deciding on a candidate, whether Ross Perot's running for
president was a good or a bad thing, whether they would have voted
for Perot if they thought there was a chance he could have won,
whether the next president would take the country in a new direction,
whether things in the United States were currently going in the right
direction, and whether they would want the job of president for
themselves or their children. Background information on respondents
includes voter registration status, party preference, education, age,
race and Hispanic origin, household income, and sex.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06020.v1
candidatesicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrenvironmental policyicpsrfederal budgeticpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential debatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvotersicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6020Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06020.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35092MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35092MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Monthly Poll, April 2011
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2014-06-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35092NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded April 2011, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the performances of President Obama and Congress on a range of topics including: the economy, the budget deficit, interventions in Afghanistan and Libya, taxes, and protecting the middle class. Queries also investigated respondents' opinions of the Tea Party movement, Medicare and Social Security reform, economic recovery, partisan cooperation, and the quality of leadership provided by the political parties. Additional subjects included: nuclear power, the price of gasoline, military involvement in Libya, and the candidates for the 2012 presidential primary and election process. Political partisanship, left-right political self-placement, and voting intentions were also gathered. Demographic and other background information includes age, gender, race, religious affiliation, education, and locality of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35092.v1
Afghanistan Waricpsrbudget cutsicpsreconomic policyicpsreconomic recoveryicpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrgasoline pricesicpsrinternational assistanceicpsrinternational relationsicpsrMedicareicpsrnuclear energyicpsrObama, Barackicpsropinion pollsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrSocial SecurityicpsrtaxesicpsrTea Party movementicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35092Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35092.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35090MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35090MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Monthly Poll, January 2011
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2014-06-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35090NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded January 2011, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the performances of President Obama and Congress on a range of topics including: the economy, health care, Afghanistan, the budget deficit, taxes, and international relations. Additional queries investigated respondents' opinions of China, the Tea Party movement, the prioritization of political issues, the Affordable Care Act, gun control, partisan cooperation, and the quality of leadership provided by the political parties. Participants were asked if race relations have improved since Barack Obama took office, and whether the current state of political discourse encouraged violence, specifically referencing the shooting of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. Additional questions included political partisanship, left-right political self-placement, and voting intentions. Demographic and other background information includes age, gender, race, religious affiliation, education, and locality of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35090.v1
budgetsicpsreconomic policyicpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrAfghanistan WaricpsrBoehner, Johnicpsrgun controlicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care reformicpsrinternational relationsicpsrnational economyicpsrObama Administration (2009- )icpsrObama, Barackicpsropinion pollsicpsrparty identificationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrrace relationsicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrtaxesicpsrTea Party movementicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35090Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35090.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35093MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35093MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Monthly Poll, June 2011
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2014-07-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35093NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded June 2011, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the performance of President Obama and Congress on a range of topics including: the economy, the budget deficit, interventions in Afghanistan and Libya, terrorism, and job creation. Queries also investigated respondents' opinions of the Tea Party movement, health care and Social Security reform, economic recovery, and the quality of leadership provided by the political parties. Additional subjects included: nuclear power, the price of gasoline, and the 2012 elections, political partisanship, left-right political self-placement, and voting intentions. Demographic and other background information includes age, gender, race, religious affiliation, income, education, and locality of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35093.v1
Afghanistan Waricpsrbudgetsicpsreconomic policyicpsreconomic recoveryicpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrhealth care reformicpsrinternational assistanceicpsrinternational relationsicpsrnational economyicpsrObama Administration (2009- )icpsrObama, Barackicpsropinion pollsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrSocial SecurityicpsrtaxesicpsrTea Party movementicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35093Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35093.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04659MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04659MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll #1, April 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2007-11-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4659NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted April 6-9, 2006, is part of a
continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on
the current presidency and on a range of other political and social
issues. A national sample of 1,229 adults was surveyed, including an
oversample of 27 Black respondents and 202 respondents aged 65 and
older. Part 1 contains data on non-oversample respondents and Black
oversample respondents, while Part 2 contains information asked only
of respondents aged 65 and older, including the aged 65 and older
oversample. Respondents were queried on whether they approved of the
way President George W. Bush was handling the presidency, and issues
such as the economy and the campaign against terrorism. Respondents
were also asked whether they approved of the way the United States
Congress and their own representatives were handling their jobs,
whether they would vote for a Democratic or Republican candidate in
the upcoming United States House of Representatives election, the
importance of issues such as health care in their voting choice, and
which party they trusted to handle the main problems the nation would
face over the next few years. Views were also sought on the war in
Iraq, whether United States military forces in Iraq should be
withdrawn, and whether Iraq was currently in a state of civil war. A
series of questions asked how much respondents knew about the new
Medicare prescription drug program, whether they approved of it, and
who was responsible for its creation. Respondents aged 65 and older
were asked whether they took prescription drugs, whether they had
signed up for the new Medicare prescription drug program, whether it
saved them money, and whether the enrollment deadline should be
extended. Other topics addressed the recent increase in gasoline
prices, illegal immigration, government waste, a new Massachusetts law
requiring all residents to have health insurance, and whether Congress
should officially reprimand or impeach President Bush for authorizing
wiretaps on suspected terrorists without court approval. Demographic
variables include sex, age, race, household income, marital status,
education level, political party affiliation, political philosophy,
voter registration status, religious preference, whether respondents
considered themselves born-again or evangelical Christians, and
whether they and their parents were born in the United States.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04659.v1
Bush, George W.icpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrdrug costsicpsrelectronic surveillanceicpsrgasoline pricesicpsrgovernment wasteicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrillegal immigrantsicpsrIraq WaricpsrMedicareicpsrmisconduct in officeicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrprescription drugsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpresidencyicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrterrorismicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesRCMD XII. Public OpinionRCMD IX.A. African AmericanTPDRC I. TerrorismABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4659Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04659.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04663MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04663MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll #1, August 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2007-11-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4663NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted August 3-6, 2006, is part of a
continuing series of monthly polls that solicit public opinion on the
presidency and on a range of other political and social issues.
Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way President
George W. Bush was handling the presidency and issues such as the
situation in Iraq and the economy. Those registered to vote were asked
how closely they were following the upcoming congressional elections
in November, whether they would vote for a Democrat or Republican
candidate for the United States House of Representatives if the
election were held that day, and which issue was most important in
their vote. All respondents were polled on which political party they
trusted to handle issues such as the United States campaign against
terrorism, which party was more concerned with the needs of people
like themselves, whether they approved of the way the United States
Congress was handling its job, and whether the Democrats were offering
a clear direction that was different from that of the Republicans.
Views were also sought on the war in Iraq, whether Iraq was in a state
of civil war, and whether the Bush Administration and the Democrats in
the United States Congress had a clear plan for handling the
situation. A series of questions regarding the conflict between Israel
and Hezbollah in Lebanon asked which group was to more to blame,
whether Israel was justified in bombing Hezbollah targets in civilian
areas, whether Israel should agree to an immediate, unconditional
cease-fire in Lebanon, whether the conflict would make Israel more
secure from attacks, and whether it would help or hurt the situation
for the United States in Iraq. Demographic variables include sex, age,
race, education level, household income, political party affiliation,
political philosophy, voter registration status, religious preference,
and whether respondents considered themselves born-again or
evangelical Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04663.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrcongressional electionsicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsreconomic conditionsicpsrIraq Waricpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4663Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04663.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04661MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04661MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll #1, June 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2007-11-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4661NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted June 22-25, 2006, is part of a
continuing series of monthly polls that solicit public opinion on the
presidency and on a range of other political and social issues.
Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way President
George W. Bush was handling the presidency and issues such as the
economy and the situation in Iraq. Several questions asked which
political party respondents trusted to handle the main problems the
country would face in the next few years, whether they would vote for
a Democrat or Republican candidate if the November 2006 election for
the United States House of Representatives were being held that day,
and which issue was most important in their vote. Views were sought on
the war in Iraq and whether it had improved the lives of the Iraqi
people, encouraged democracy in other Arab nations, and contributed to
the long-term security of the United States. Respondents were polled
on whether the Bush Administration and the Democrats in the United
States Congress had a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq,
how well the United States campaign against terrorism was going,
whether the country was safer from terrorism than before September 11,
2001, and whether President Bush would be remembered more for the
United States campaign against terrorism or the war in Iraq. A series
of questions asked respondents whether they approved of the way United
States military forces in Iraq were doing their job, whether a
deadline should be set for their withdrawal from Iraq, and
respondents' reactions to the alleged killings of Iraqi civilians by
United States military forces. Additional topics addressed the death
penalty, the federal government's detention of suspected terrorists
without trial in the United States military prison in Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, and the federal government's progress in its efforts to rebuild
New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Demographic variables include sex,
age, race, education level, household income, political party
affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status,
religious preference, and whether respondents considered themselves
born-again or evangelical Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04661.v1
disaster relieficpsrfederal governmenticpsrhurricanesicpsrIraq Waricpsrmilitary civilian relationsicpsrnational economyicpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist prosecutionicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrarmed forcesicpsrattitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrcapital punishmenticpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4661Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04661.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04657MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04657MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll #1, March 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2007-06-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4657NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted March 2-5, 2006, is part of a
continuing series of monthly polls that solicit public opinion on the
presidency and on a range of other political and social issues.
Respondents were asked their opinions of President George W. Bush and
his handling of the presidency as well as his handling of issues such
as the situation in Iraq and health care. Those polled also gave their
opinions of the condition of the national economy, the United States
Congress, Vice President Dick Cheney, Senator Hillary Clinton, Senator
John McCain, and the Democratic and Republican parties. A series of
questions asked whether the war in Iraq was worth fighting, whether
United States military forces should be increased, decreased, or
maintained, whether progress was being made to restore civil order in
Iraq and establish a democratic government, and whether the Bush
Administration and the Democrats in Congress had a clear plan for
handling the situation in Iraq. Views were also sought on the use of
wiretapping and surveillance by the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) and the National Security Agency in conducting the war on
terrorism, whether the government was doing enough to protect the
rights of American citizens, and whether the country was safer from
terrorism now, as compared to before September 11, 2001. Additional
topics addressed the bird flu virus, the Terri Schiavo case, the
recent controversy surrounding a merger deal that would give
management of six United States ports to a company owned by the United
Arab Emirates, the religion of Islam, and whether respondents and any
of their friends and relatives were prejudiced against Muslims and
Arabs. Demographic variables included sex, age, race, household
income, education level, religious affiliation, political party
affiliation, political philosophy, and type of residential area (e.g.,
urban or rural).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04657.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrCheney, Dickicpsrcivil rightsicpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrelectronic surveillanceicpsrfederal governmenticpsrIraq WaricpsrIslamicpsrMcCain, JohnicpsrMuslimsicpsrnational economyicpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrprejudiceicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrreligious attitudesicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrterrorismicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesTPDRC I. TerrorismABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4657Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04657.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04660MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04660MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll #1, May 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2007-10-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4660NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted May 11-15, 2006, is part of a
continuing series of monthly polls that solicit public opinion on the
presidency and on a range of other political and social issues.
Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way President
George W. Bush was handling the presidency and issues such as the
federal budget deficit and the economy, whether they approved of the
way the United States Congress and their own representative were doing
their jobs, and which political party they trusted to handle the main
problems the country would face in the next few years. Several
questions asked how closely respondents were following the upcoming
November 2006 election, whether they would vote for a Democratic or
Republican candidate for the United States House of Representatives,
the reasons for their choice, and which political party they hoped
would win control of Congress. Views were also sought on the war in
Iraq, and whether the Bush administration intentionally misled the
American public in making its case for war with Iraq. A series of
questions asked respondents whether the country, their state, and
their local community were headed in the right direction, how
satisfied they were with their life, and whether they felt optimistic
about the future. Those polled also gave their impressions of Senator
Hillary Clinton, former President Bill Clinton, and Senator John
McCain, as well as the likelihood that they would vote for Hillary
Clinton and John McCain if they ran for president in 2008. Additional
questions addressed Hillary Clinton's views on issues, whether she
possessed qualities such as leadership and trustworthiness, and
whether Bill Clinton had too much political influence over her. Other
topics addressed illegal immigration, Bush administration policies,
the recent increase in gasoline prices, and the secret collection of
domestic telephone records by the National Security Agency.
Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education level,
household income, political party affiliation, political philosophy,
voter registration status, religious preference, and whether
respondents considered themselves born-again or evangelical
Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04660.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrcivil rightsicpsrClinton, BillicpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrelectronic surveillanceicpsrfederal governmenticpsrIraq Waricpsrlife satisfactionicpsrMcCain, Johnicpsrnational economyicpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrterrorismicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesTPDRC I. TerrorismABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4660Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04660.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09754MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09754MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll #2, October 1991
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9754NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
monthly surveys that evaluate the Bush presidency and solicit
opinions on a variety of political and social issues. Topics covered
include respondents' confidence in certain institutions, federal,
state, and local taxes, government spending, Dan Quayle's work as
vice president, and the things they liked and disliked about the
Democratic and Republican parties. Respondents also were asked
whether they ever voted for a Democratic or Republican presidential
candidate in a general election, which problems were important in
deciding how to vote for president, whom they would vote for as
president if the 1992 election were held that day, and toward which
candidate they were leaning. Background information on respondents
includes political alignment, 1988 presidential vote choice,
education, age, religion, origin of ancestors, social class, marital
status, number of people in household, labor union membership,
employment status, race, income, sex, and state/region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09754.v1
Bush Administration (1989-1993)icpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgovernment spendingicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrQuayle, Danicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtaxesicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9754Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09754.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09558MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09558MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll #2, September 1990
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2007-07-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9558NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection focuses on the federal budget deficit
and on issues dealing with the rich and the poor in America.
Respondents were asked if they approved of the way George Bush,
Democrats in Congress, and Republicans in Congress were handling the
the federal budget deficit, and who was more to blame for the larger
deficit. Additionally, respondents were asked how much money it takes
to be rich in the United States, whether they would want to be rich,
how likely it was that they would ever be rich or poor, whether the
percentage of Americans who are rich was increasing, and whether they
respected and admired rich people. Other questions asked respondents
if they characterized rich people as more likely to be honest,
snobbish, intelligent, and a variety of other traits, whether
respondents would be more or less likely to vote for a candidate who
was a millionaire/self-made millionaire, and which political party
better represented the interests of poor, rich, and middle class
people. Background information on respondents includes political
alignment, 1988 presidential vote choice, registered voter status,
education, age, religion, social class, marital status, number of
people in the household, labor union membership, employment status,
race, income, sex, and state/region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09558.v1
attitudesicpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrmiddle classesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical representationicpsrpovertyicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial issuesicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrwealthicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9558Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09558.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02003MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02003MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, August 1996
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2007-05-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR2003NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted August 1996, is part of a continuing
series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on a range of
political and social issues. Views were gathered on the 1996
presidential and congressional elections, as well as on President
Bill Clinton and his handling of the presidency, the economy, and
foreign affairs. Respondents were polled on whether they were better
or worse off financially compared to three years ago, whether it was
more important to cut federal taxes or balance the federal budget,
and whether they supported middle class tax cuts, even if it meant
cutting spending on federal programs. Questions involving the
upcoming presidential election polled respondents on the likelihood
that they would vote, whom they would vote for (President Bill
Clinton, Republican Bob Dole, or Reform Party candidate Ross Perot),
whether each candidate had the qualities needed to be an effective
president, the success of their political campaigns, and who the
Republican vice-presidential candidate should be. Opinions were
solicited on whether the presidential candidates had a vision for the
future of the country, had high moral and ethical standards, cared
about people like the respondent, had new ideas, and stood up for
what they believed in, and which one would do a better job handling
issues such as the economy, crime, the environment, and Medicare.
Respondents were queried on whether they would vote for a Democratic
or Republican candidate in the upcoming United States House of
Representatives election, whether they approved of the way the United
States Congress was doing its job, and whether Pat Buchanan should be
allowed to make a speech at the Republican convention. Respondents
were also asked which political party best represented their ideal of
how the United States should be governed, whether the views of each
party were too conservative or too liberal, whether respondents
supported Ross Perot's new Reform Party, and whether the country
needed a new political party. Views were also elicited on issues such
as a federal balanced budget amendment, the death penalty,
congressional term limits, gun control, organized prayer in public
schools, a flat-tax system, recent changes to the welfare system,
affirmative action, gay rights, and whether respondents would prefer
a smaller government with fewer services or a larger government with
many services. Several questions addressed whether abortion should be
legal, whether the Republican vice-presidential candidate should
support legal abortion, and whether the Republican platform should
support a constitutional amendment to ban abortion. Other topics
addressed respondents' level of confidence in the United States
government to prevent future terrorist attacks, how worried they were
about the possibility of major terrorist attacks in the United
States, and whether the government should mount a war against
terrorism, even if it cost billions of dollars and intruded on
personal freedoms. Background variables include sex, age, ethnicity,
marital status, employment status, education, religion, household
income, social class, subjective size of community, labor union
membership, political orientation, political party affiliation, and
voter registration and participation history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02003.v1
abortionicpsrBuchanan, Paticpsrcampaign issuesicpsrClinton, BillicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrDole, Bobicpsrfederal budgeticpsrnational economyicpsrPerot, Rossicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrReform PartyicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrsocial issuesicpsrtaxesicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrvoting behavioricpsrTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2003Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02003.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09890MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09890MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, December 1991
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2006-12-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9890NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that evaluate the Bush presidency and solicit opinions on a variety
of political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they
approved or disapproved of Bush's handling of the presidency and why,
whether the nation's economy could be described as excellent, good,
not so good, or poor, whether they were better off financially than
in 1989 when Bush became president, and whether Bush cared equally
about serving people of all income levels. Concerning political
parties, respondents were asked whether the Democrats or Republicans
could do a better job of coping with the main problems the nation
would face in the coming years and which party could better handle
issues such as the economy, crime, foreign affairs, education,
defense, and health care. Concerning Congress, respondents were asked
whether they approved of the way their own United States
Representative was handling his or her job, whether they approved of
the way Congress in general was doing its job and why, and whether
they approved of the way the Democrats in Congress were handling the
nation's economy. In addition, those surveyed were asked whether Bush
or the Democrats in Congress could be trusted to do a better job on
the economy, whether Bush and the Democrats in Congress were more
interested in doing what's best for the economy or what's best for
themselves politically, and whether the United States needed a new
president that would set the nation in another direction. Respondents
were also asked whether cutting taxes or increasing domestic spending
was more important at the present time, whether their biggest problem
was high taxes, slow income growth, or too much debt, whether it had
become more difficult to get a promotion or a better job in the past
year, whether their hours and overtime had been reduced in the past
year, and if their latest pay raise had been higher or lower than
usual. Concerning the 1992 presidential election, respondents were
asked for whom they would vote if their state held a Democratic or
Republican primary/caucus for president, toward whom they were
leaning for the primary/caucus at the time of the interview, what the
chances were that they would vote in the 1992 presidential election,
whether they would vote for Bush or various other prospective
candidates/nominees were the national election held at the time of
the interview, and toward whom they were leaning for the national
election at the time of the interview. Additionally, respondents were
asked whether they would consider voting for David Duke, whether they
would like to see the 1992 national elections result in a Republican
president with a Democratic majority in Congress or various other
combinations and how important that was, and how much a candidate's
position on health care influenced the respondent's vote. Other
topics included living wills, the cost and availability of health
care, approaches to financing health care, and health benefits
provided by employers. Background information on respondents includes
political alignment, voter registration status, most recent
presidential vote choice, education, age, race, income, economic
class, religion, marital status, household composition, labor union
membership, urban/suburban/rural residence, and sex.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09890.v1
Bush, George H.W.icpsrcrimeicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrforeign policyicpsrhealth careicpsrnational defenseicpsrpolitical candidatesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial issuesicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrUnited States House of Representativesicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrBush Administration (1989-1993)icpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9890Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09890.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04525MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04525MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, December 2005
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2006-12-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4525NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted December 15-18, 2005, is part of a
continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on
the current presidency and on a range of other political and social
issues. Respondents were asked to give their opinions of President
George W. Bush and his handling of the presidency and issues such as
the economy, health care, and the situation in Iraq. Views were sought
on the most important problem for President Bush and the United States
Congress to deal with in the upcoming year, and respondents rated
their level of optimism in regard to issues such as the nation's
defense against natural disasters and possible terrorist attacks.
Respondents were asked whether they would be more likely to vote for a
Democratic or Republican candidate if the November 2006 congressional
election were held today, and whether they approved of the way the
members of Congress and their own representative were doing their
jobs. The poll also elicited views on whether the war with Iraq was
worth fighting, whether United States military forces in Iraq should
be increased, decreased, or remain the same, and whether a deadline
should be set for their withdrawal. Other questions asked whether
progress was being made in Iraq and whether its recent elections
brought the United States closer to the withdrawal of its military
forces. Additional topics focused on illegal immigration, abortion,
recent Supreme Court Justice nominee Samuel Alito, the use of torture
on and secret detainment of suspected terrorists in the United States
campaign against terrorism, and whether respondents preferred the
greeting "Merry Christmas" or "Happy Holidays." Demographic variables
include age, sex, race, education level, voter registration status,
household income, political party affiliation, political philosophy,
religious affiliation, type of residential area, and frequency of
religious service attendance.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04525.v1
abortionicpsrAlito, SamuelicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrholidaysicpsrillegal immigrantsicpsrIraq Waricpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrterrorismicpsrtortureicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Supreme Courticpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4525Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04525.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22165MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22165MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, December 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-08-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22165NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted December 7-11, 2006, is part of a continuing series of monthly polls that solicit public opinion on various political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way George W. Bush was handling his job as president and issues such as the economy, whether they approved of the way members of United States Congress and their own representative were handling their jobs, and to rate the condition of the national economy. Views were sought on the upcoming switch to Democratic control of Congress, what was the most important problem for President Bush and Congress to deal with in the next year and whether they trusted President Bush or Congress more to handle these problems. Several questions asked whether Congress should hold hearings on how the Bush Administration handled issues related to the war with Iraq and the United States' campaign against terrorism, whether the war with Iraq was worth fighting, whether the number of United States military casualties in Iraq was acceptable, and whether the war in Iraq has contributed to the long-term security of the United States. A series of questions asked whether the United States should keep its military forces in Iraq until civil order is restored there, whether the United States was winning the war in Iraq, whether respondents would describe the situation in Iraq as a civil war, and whether the United States should hold direct talks with Syria and Iran about the situation in Iraq. Respondents were asked whether they supported certain plans and decisions, such as the Iraq Study Group report, changing the primary mission of United States forces to supporting and training the Iraqi army, or reducing United States military and financial support of the Iraqi government. Several questions asked for respondents' opinions of current political leaders and the 2008 presidential candidates, which candidate they would vote for if the 2008 Democratic and Republican primaries were held that day, and whether a presidential candidate's gender, race, or religion would affect their vote. Additional topics included immigration, privacy rights, and whether respondents were hopeful about the upcoming year for themselves and the world. Demographic variables include sex, age, religion, race, education level, household income, whether anyone in the household was a military veteran, voter registration and participation history, political party affiliation, political philosophy, and type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22165.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrEdwards, JohnicpsrFBIicpsrfederal governmenticpsrGuiliani, RudolphicpsrimmigrantsicpsrIraq WaricpsrMcCain, Johnicpsrnational economyicpsrnational securityicpsrObama, BarackicpsrPelosi, Nancyicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical leadersicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrprivacyicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrRomney, Mitticpsrsocial issuesicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22165Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22165.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08560MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1988 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08560MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, February 1985
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2006-11-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1988ICPSR8560NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
In this survey respondents were asked to assess the
performance of President Reagan and other top government officials
and to give their opinions on proposed restrictions on federal
student loans, Attorney General designee Edwin Meese, and the
Democratic and Republican parties. In a series of questions relating
to national political parties, respondents were asked to designate
the party and its leaders best able to handle the major problems
facing the county, to rate each party's concern with its own
political power, and to describe the differences between the two
parties. Other topics included in the survey were the 55 mile per
hour speed limit, the Vietnam war, Nicaragua, and respondent's
preference for and history of residence in different types of
communities. Demographic characteristics also are included.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08560.v1
student loansicpsrMeese, Edwinicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrReagan, Ronaldicpsrsocial issuesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8560Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08560.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06618MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06618MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, February 1994
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
1997-05-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6618NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to identify the
biggest problems facing the country and to comment on whether they
thought the United States was generally going in the right direction
or was on the wrong track. They were also asked whether they approved
of Bill Clinton's handling of his job as president, the nation's
economy, the federal budget deficit, foreign affairs, crime, the
situation involving the former Yugoslavian republics of Serbia and
Bosnia, and Clinton's health care plan. The health care plan was
closely examined with questions on whether it was better or worse than
the present system and whether the respondent supported federal price
controls on medical expenses, an insurance program that would not pay
for some medically unnecessary or low-success treatments, and federal
laws requiring all employers to provide health insurance to full-time
employees and pay some costs for part-time employees. Respondents
were asked whether groups such as the American Medical Association,
the health insurance industry, Republicans in Congress, Democrats in
Congress, and the Clinton administration were helping or hurting
efforts to improve the nation's health care system. They were also
asked which political party they would trust to do a better job of
handling the nation's economy, crime, foreign affairs, improving
education and schools, maintaining a strong national defense, helping
the middle class, holding taxes down, helping the poor, providing
affordable health care, encouraging high moral standards and values,
creating jobs, reducing the federal budget deficit, and making
American industry competitive. Other topics covered neighborhood
crime, prisons, the respondent's impression of Japan, and the arrest
of an official of the Central Intelligence Agency accused of spying
for the Russians. Demographic background variables include political
orientation, age, race, income, and education.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06618.v1
public opinionicpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsrClinton, Billicpsrcrimeicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrforeign policyicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care costsicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrnational debticpsrnational defenseicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6618Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06618.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08516MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1988 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08516MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, January 1985
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2009-11-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1988ICPSR8516NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted January 11-16, 1985, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked to rate Reagan's
performance as president over the past four years and to describe their
expectations for his performance in his second term in office. Respondents also were asked a series of questions relating to the nation's economy, their personal financial situation and expectations, and whether they trusted the Democrats or Republicans to do a better job in coping with the nation's problems. A series of questions asked about the federal budget deficit
and ways to reduce it, federal income tax system and the Treasury Department's
tax reform proposal. Additional subjects addressed support for nuclear power, the apartheid protests in South Africa, the New York City subway shooting, and gun ownership. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education level, marital status, religious preference, voter registration status and participation history, political party affiliation, political philosophy, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), household income, the number of household members over the age of 18, whether respondents considered themselves to be middle or working class, and whether any member of the household was a veteran, a labor union member, or employed by the government.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08516.v2
Apartheidicpsrincome taxesicpsrnational debticpsrnational economyicpsrnuclear powericpsrpersonal securityicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrattitudesicpsrReagan, Ronaldicpsrsocial classesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtax reformicpsrunemploymenticpsreconomic conditionsicpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrfederal income taxicpsrfirearmsicpsrflat taxicpsrgovernment spendingicpsrgun ownershipicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8516Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08516.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09061MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09061MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, January 1988
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2006-12-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9061NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
monthly surveys that evaluates the Reagan presidency and solicits
opinions on a variety of political and social issues. Topics covered
include trust in the government and the two major political parties,
the environment, the nation's health, public education, crime, the
quality of life, world peace, and the economy. In addition, opinions
were solicited regarding the respondent's favorable or unfavorable
impression of various public figures, the respondent's choice for
presidential candidate, the debates that had taken place among the
various presidential candidates, the most important issue in choosing
a candidate, and which party's candidate would do a better job in
dealing with problems such as reducing the trade deficit,
unemployment, holding down taxes, and providing leadership.
Respondents also were asked a detailed series of questions comparing
the Republican candidates George Bush and Robert Dole. Background
information on respondents includes political alignment, 1984
presidential vote choice, education, age, religion, marital status,
household composition, labor union membership, employment status,
race, income, and state/region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09061.v1
crimeicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrenvironmenticpsrleadershipicpsrnational debticpsrpeaceicpsrpolitical candidatesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic figuresicpsrpublic opinionicpsrquality of lifeicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrReagan, Ronaldicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtaxesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrunemploymenticpsrvoter attitudesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9061Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09061.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09436MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09436MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, January 1990
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2006-11-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9436NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
monthly surveys that evaluate the Bush presidency and solicit
opinions on a variety of political and social issues. Respondents
were asked to name the two most important problems facing the
country, if they approved of the way George Bush was handling the
nation's economy, the environment, the illegal drug problem, and
foreign affairs, and if they trusted federal, state, and local
governments to do what was right. Respondents also were questioned as
to which political party they trusted to do a better job handling a
variety of political, economic, and social problems, if they thought
things would get better in the next ten years, and how they would
rate the military and economic power of the United States vis-a-vis
Japan and the Soviet Union over the past 20 years. Other topics
covered include the United States military action in Panama, Manuel
Noriega, the illegal drug problem, and respondents' satisfaction with
careers, marriage, children, and cultural life. Background
information on respondents includes political alignment, 1988
presidential vote choice, education, age, religion, social class,
marital status, household composition, labor union membership,
employment status, race, sex, income, and state/region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09436.v1
Bush Administration (1989-1993)icpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrdrug lawsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrenvironmenticpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmilitary interventionicpsrmilitary strengthicpsrNoriega, ManuelicpsrPanamaicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical powericpsrpresidencyicpsrpublic opinionicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrSoviet Unionicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9436Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09436.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09887MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09887MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, January 1992
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
1993-10-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9887NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
of various candidates involved in the 1992
presidential election, the reelection of the respondent's
representative in Congress, and the chances of the respondent's voting
in the 1992 presidential election. Background information on
respondents includes political alignment, voter registration status,
most recent presidential vote choice, education, age, race, income,
economic class, religion, marital status, household composition, labor
union membership, urban/suburban/rural residence, and sex.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09887.v1
Bush Administration (1989-1993)icpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrcandidatesicpsrClinton, Billicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign affiarsicpsrhealth careicpsrmilitary spendingicpsrmisconduct in officeicpsrPersian Gulf Waricpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial issuesicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9887Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09887.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03429MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03429MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, January 2002
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2002-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3429NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
ith
them, and whether the United States was dependent on the oil it buys
from Saudi Arabia. In addition, respondents were asked to give their
views on whether the federal government should allow oil drilling in
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Background information
on respondents includes age, gender, political party, political
orientation, voter registration and participation history, education,
race, Hispanic descent, marital status, children in household,
religion, labor union membership, urban/suburban/rural area of
residence, whether close family/friends lost a job in the previous six
months, and household income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03429.v1
bin Laden, OsamaicpsrHussein, Saddamicpsrmilitary expendituresicpsrnational debticpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrrecessionicpsrBush, George W.icpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrSocial Securityicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist prosecutionicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrBush, LauraicpsrcounterterrorismicpsrDaschle, Tomicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrenvironmenticpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3429Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03429.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09611MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09611MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, June 1991
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-01-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9611NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
monthly surveys that evaluate the Bush presidency and solicit
opinions on a variety of political and social issues. Respondents
were questioned regarding the condition of the national, state, and
local economies, financial conditions of the federal and state
governments, the most important thing they thought should be done to
improve these conditions, and which political party they trusted to
do a better job of coping with the main problems facing the nation
over the next few years. Respondents also were questioned in depth
about civil rights, including whether they thought Blacks and other
minorities were discriminated against in hiring, whether Blacks had a
better chance of advancing to management or supervisory positions
than whites, and whether they thought the Democrats or the
Republicans generally came closest to reflecting their views on civil
rights. Other topics covered include abortion, financial aid to and
free trade with the Soviet Union, and the Persian Gulf War.
Background information on respondents includes political alignment,
1988 presidential vote choice, education, age, religion, social
class, marital status, number of people in household, labor union
membership, employment status, race, income, sex, and state/region of
residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09611.v1
social issuesicpsrabortionicpsrBush Administration (1989-1993)icpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrcivil rightsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign relationsicpsrfree tradeicpsrinternational tradeicpsrnational debticpsrPersian Gulf Waricpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9611Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09611.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03286MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03286MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, June 2001
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2002-04-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3286NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their
opinions of President George W. Bush and his handling of the
presidency, the economy, and other issues. Respondents were queried
regarding whether the country should follow the lead of President Bush
or the Democrats in Congress, how the positions of the Democratic
Party compared with those of the Republican Party with respect to
political moderates, and whether the federal government or individual
state governments provided better regulation of health
plans. Respondents also answered a series of questions about the
impact on the country of the Democrats' taking control of the Senate,
whether Bush's views on most issues were too conservative, too
liberal, or just right, and what the federal government's role in, and
responses to, the problem of regional energy shortages should be. In
addition, respondents were queried regarding the consequences of the
$1.4 trillion tax cut, whether they preferred the tax cut to more
federal spending on domestic programs, and what they planned to do
with their tax refund checks when they received them. Those queried
were also asked to assess their level of concern regarding Congress's
role in making it easier for managed care patients to sue their health
plans. Opinions were also solicited as to whether the federal judges
nominated by Bush were too conservative, too liberal, or just
right. Background information includes the respondent's political
affiliation, education level, religious tendencies, race, income
level, and gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03286.v1
public opinionicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtax cutsicpsrBush, George W.icpsreconomic conditionsicpsrenergy shortagesicpsrhealth careicpsrgovernment programsicpsrgovernment spendingicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3286Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03286.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02724MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02724MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, March 1999
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
1999-06-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2724NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This monthly poll, fielded March 11-14, 1999, is part of a
continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on
the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues.
Respondents were asked for their opinions of President Bill Clinton,
Vice President Al Gore, their state's governor, the United States
Congress, First Lady Hillary Clinton, Texas governor George W. Bush,
former Red Cross president Elizabeth Dole, former New Jersey Senator
Bill Bradley, former Vice President Dan Quayle, Arizona Senator John
McCain, former Tennessee governor Lamar Alexander, multimillionaire
publisher Steve Forbes, and conservative commentator Pat
Buchanan. Respondents were asked to assess the importance of a
political candidate's stance on a variety of issues as well as which
party is best able to handle those issues. Topics included crime, the
economy, foreign affairs, the middle class, moral values, Medicare,
the environment, partisanship, and tolerance. Those queried were asked
whether they believed the 1994 switch of congressional balance to the
Republican party had been a good or a bad thing. Given possible 2000
presidential races between Democratic hopefuls Gore and Bradley and
Republican hopefuls Bush and Dole, respondents were asked for whom
they would vote. Those queried were also asked for whom they would
vote in a Republican primary or caucus consisting of Bush, Dole,
Quayle, Buchanan, Forbes, Alexander, McCain, Family Research Council
president Gary Bauer, Ohio Congressman John Kasich, radio talk show
host Alan Keyes, and New Hampshire Senator Bob Smith. They were also
asked for whom they would vote in a Democratic primary or caucus
consisting of Gore, Bradley, and Reverend Jesse Jackson. Respondents
were asked whether the following characteristics made them more or
less likely to vote for a candidate for president: the candidate is a
woman, has used cocaine, has smoked marijuana, has never before held
elected office, is an environmentalist, has cheated on a spouse, has
lived and/or worked in Washington, DC, most of his/her life, has been
accused of improper campaign fundraising, supports legalized abortion,
was once a heavy drinker, and/or is supported by labor unions. A
series of questions addressed the situation in Kosovo, including
whether United States vital interests were at stake in the region,
whether the United States should bomb Serbia if Serbia did not agree
to a peace plan for Kosovo, and whether the United States and Europe
should use ground forces to enforce a peace treaty. Additional topics
covered the state of the nation's economy, possible uses for the
federal budget surplus, respondent enthusiasm for a 2000 presidential
race between Gore and Bush, and the 2000 congressional
elections. Background information on respondents includes age, race,
sex, education, religion, political party, political orientation,
voter registration and participation history, and labor union
membership.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02724.v1
public opinionicpsrQuayle, Danicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial valuesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrAlexander, LamaricpsrBradley, BillicpsrBuchanan, PaticpsrBush, George W.icpsrClinton, BillicpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDole, Elizabethicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrenvironmental policyicpsrForbes, Steveicpsrforeign policyicpsrGore, AlicpsrMedicareicpsrMcCain, Johnicpsrpolitical candidatesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2724Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02724.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06822MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06822MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, May 1996
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-05-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6822NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their
opinions of President Bill Clinton and his handling of the
presidency, foreign policy, and the economy. They were also asked for
their views regarding Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, the United
States Congress, the 1996 presidential and congressional elections,
the state of the nation's economy, and the qualities they look for in
a president. Comparative questions elicited respondents' opinions on
whether President Clinton was an old-style, tax-and-spend Democrat or
a new-style Democrat who would be careful with the public's money,
and whether Senator Dole was an old-style Republican who wanted to
cut taxes for the rich and social programs for the poor, or a
new-style Republican who would protect social programs while cutting
the federal budget. Additional topics covered the impact of Dole's
resignation from the Senate on the upcoming presidential election,
the moral standing of the Democratic and Republican parties, and
whether Clinton and Dole should be classified as Washington insiders.
Background variables include age, race, sex, education, political
party, and voter registration and participation history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06822.v1
Clinton, BillicpsrDole, Bobicpsrforeign policyicpsrnational economyicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpoliticiansicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidencyicpsrpublic opinionicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6822Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06822.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24588MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24588MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, May 2007
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2009-04-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR24588NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted May 29-June 1, 2007, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. A national sample of 1,205 adults was surveyed, including an oversample of 204 Black respondents. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way George W. Bush was handling the presidency and issues such as the economy. Views were sought on whether the country was moving in the right direction, how well members of the United States Congress were doing their jobs, and whether President Bush or the Democrats in Congress could be trusted to do a better job handling important issues. Respondents were asked how closely they were following the 2008 presidential race, for whom they would vote if the presidential primary or caucus was held that day, their opinions of the presidential candidates, and the single most important issue in their choice for president. A series of questions addressed the Iraq war, including the number of United States military forces in Iraq, the effect of the war in Iraq on the campaign against terrorism, and possible outcomes if the United States were to withdraw from Iraq before civil order was restored there. Other topics addressed immigration policy and United States Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' handling of the firing of nine chief federal prosecutors. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, household income, household union membership, education level, political party affiliation, voter registration status, political philosophy, religious preference, whether respondents considered themselves to be born-again Christians, and whether respondents and their parents were born in the United States.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24588.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrEdwards, JohnicpsrGingrich, NewticpsrGore, AlicpsrGuiliani, Rudolphicpsrimmigrantsicpsrimmigration policyicpsrIraq WaricpsrMcCain, JohnicpsrObama, Barackicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrRomney, Mitticpsrsocial issuesicpsrterrorismicpsrThompson, FredicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrRCMD IX.A. African AmericanTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesRCMD XII. Public OpinionABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24588Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24588.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09560MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09560MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, October 1990
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-07-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9560NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that evaluate the Bush presidency and solicit opinions on a variety of political and social issues. Major topics covered include Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the federal budget deficit, the upcoming general election, and issues regarding Israel. Questions focusing on the situation in the Persian Gulf addressed the issues of the use of military force if necessary to ensure Iraq's withdrawal from Kuwait, long-term military presence of the United States in the Gulf region, the use of military force should the economic embargo prove unsuccessful, the likelihood that the United States would go to war with Iraq, and Americans and other foreigners being held hostage by Iraq. Respondents also were asked if they approved of the way George Bush, the Democrats, and the Republicans in Congress were handling the budget deficit, who was more to blame for the large deficit, who was working harder to reduce it, and if they thought the congressional committees would come up with a better budget plan after the rejection of the plan drawn up by Bush and leaders of Congress. In addition, respondents were asked which candidate and political party they would vote for on election day, if they approved of the way their public officials (congressional representative, governor, Congress, and state legislature) were doing their jobs, if they approved of proposals to limit the number of years a person could serve as an elected public official at the state and national levels, and what they thought about a number of issues related to Israel and the Palestinians. Background information on respondents includes political alignment, 1988 presidential vote choice, registered voter status, education, age, religion, social class, marital status, number of people in the household, labor union membership, employment status, race, income, sex, and state/region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09560.v1
national electionsicpsrPersian Gulf Waricpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic officialsicpsrpublic opinionicpsreconomic policyicpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrIraqicpsrIsraelicpsrIsraeli Palestinian conflicticpsrKuwaiticpsrmilitary interventionicpsrnational economyicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9560Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09560.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06677MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06677MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Poll, September 1995
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-07-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6677NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their opinions of President Bill Clinton and his handling of the presidency, the economy, foreign affairs, and the situation in Bosnia, as well as their views on Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, retired General Colin Powell, Pope John Paul II, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, former head of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) Benjamin Chavis, and Ross Perot. Those queried were asked for their opinions on the 1996 presidential and congressional elections, the differences among the Republican, Democratic, and United We Stand parties, the possibility of a third-party victory, and the qualities of an effective president. Questions regarding the Roman Catholic Church addressed the role of the Pope and whether the church's positions on the following topics truly reflected the beliefs of its members: birth control, divorce, premarital sexual relations, homosexuals, priests and marriage, and female priests. Other topics covered the current state of Medicare, Republican plans to alter Medicare, and the Million Man March and the absence of women as participants in it. Background information includes age, sex, race, education, religion, political party, voter registration and participation history, family income, employment status, marital status, political orientation, Medicare coverage, and the demographics of the respondent's community.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06677.v1
Catholic ChurchicpsrJackson, JesseicpsrPerot, Rossicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrPope John Paul IIicpsrPowell, Colinicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrChavis, Benjaminicpsrsocial issuesicpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsrClinton, BillicpsrDole, Bobicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrFarrakhan, Louisicpsrforeign policyicpsrforeign relationsicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6677Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06677.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03071MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03071MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Post-Democratic National Committee (DNC) Convention Poll, August 2000
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2001-03-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3071NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, fielded August 18, 2000, queried
respondents following the August 14-17 Democratic National Committee
(DNC) Convention in Los Angeles, CA. Respondents were asked how much
attention they had paid to the 2000 presidential race and whether they
intended to vote in the November election. Those queried were asked
for whom they would vote, given a choice among candidates Vice
President Al Gore (Democratic Party), Texas governor George W. Bush
(Republican Party), conservative commentator Pat Buchanan (Reform
Party), and political activist Ralph Nader (Green Party). Their views
were sought on whether the nation needed a president who could set it
in a new direction or whether the nation needed to keep moving in the
direction President Bill Clinton had been taking it. Respondents were
asked which candidate they trusted to better handle the national
economy, protect the Social Security system, improve education and the
schools, help the middle class, improve the health care system, and
hold taxes down. Additional topics covered whether Gore and Bush were
strong leaders, had appealing personalities, understood the problems
of the American people, and possessed sufficient experience to be
president, and which political party was more tolerant of different
points of view. Background information on respondents includes age,
gender, political party, political orientation, voter registration and
participation history, education, religion, and race.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03071.v1
Buchanan, PaticpsrBush, George W.icpsrcandidatesicpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsrClinton, BillicpsrDemocratic National ConventionicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsreducationicpsrGore, AlicpsrNader, Ralphicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrSocial Securityicpsrtaxesicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3071Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03071.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03068MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03068MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Post-Republican National Committee (RNC) Convention Poll, August 2000
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2001-02-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3068NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, fielded August 4, 2000, queried
respondents following the July 31-August 4 Republican National
Committee (RNC) Convention in Philadelphia, PA. Respondents were asked
how much attention they had paid to the 2000 presidential race and
whether they intended to vote in the November election. Those queried
were asked for whom they would vote, given a choice among candidates
Vice President Al Gore (Democratic Party), Texas governor George
W. Bush (Republican Party), conservative commentator Pat Buchanan
(Reform Party), and political activist Ralph Nader (Green
Party). Their views were sought on whether the nation needed a
president who could set it in a new direction or whether the nation
needed to keep moving in the direction President Bill Clinton had been
taking it. Respondents were asked whether they shared Bush's views on
most issues, whether they shared the political views of the Republican
Party, whether Bush was a different kind of Republican, and which
political party was more tolerant of different points of view.
Background information on respondents includes age, gender, political
party, political orientation, voter registration and participation
history, education, and race.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03068.v1
Buchanan, PaticpsrBush, George W.icpsrcandidatesicpsrGore, AlicpsrNader, Ralphicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican National ConventionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3068Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03068.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22163MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22163MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Pre-Election Poll #1, October 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
2008-05-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22163NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, conducted October 19-22, 2006, is
part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public
opinion on the current presidency and on a range of other political
and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the
way George W. Bush was handling his job as president, whether they
approved of the way Congress and their own representative in Congress
was handling their job, and to rate the condition of the national
economy. Registered voters were asked whether they followed the
congressional elections, whether they were likely to vote, and which
candidate they would vote for if the election were being held that
day. Registered voters who had already voted absentee were asked which
candidate they voted for, how enthusiastic they were about their vote,
and whether their vote was more for one political party, or more
against the other political party. Opinions were solicited on what was
the most important issue in congressional elections, whether things in
the country were generally going in the right direction, whether their
reason for voting for a candidate for Congress included showing
support for George W. Bush, which political party they trusted to do a
better job handling issues such as the situation in Iraq and the
economy, and whether they thought a change of control from the
Republicans to the Democrats would be a good thing. Information was
collected on whether respondents had been contacted by any
organization working in support of a candidate for Congress and which
political party they were asked to vote for, whether the 2006
congressional elections were more important to the country than past
elections, and whether the war with Iraq was worth fighting.
Additional questions asked how much Congress should be blamed for
problems relating to the war with Iraq, how much credit Congress
should get for preventing terrorist attacks, whether respondents felt
optimistic about the situation in Iraq, and if the United States had
the same kind of involvement in the war with Iraq as it did the
Vietnam war. Demographic variables include sex, age, religion, race,
education level, household income, labor union membership, voter
registration and participation history, political party affiliation,
political philosophy, employment status, marital status, and type of
residential area (e.g., urban or rural).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22163.v1
terrorist attacksicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrattitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrcongressional candidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrIraq Waricpsrnational economyicpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrterrorismicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesTPDRC I. TerrorismABC NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22163Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22163.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22164MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22164MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Pre-Election Poll #2, November 2006
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22164NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted November 1-4, 2006, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way George W. Bush was handling his job as president, whether they approved of the way the United States Congress and their own representative in Congress was handling their job, and to rate the condition of the national economy. Registered voters were asked whether they were following the upcoming congressional mid-term elections on November 7, 2006, whether they were likely to vote, and which candidate they would vote for if the election were being held that day. Registered voters who had already voted were asked which candidate they voted for, how enthusiastic they were about their vote, and whether their vote was more for one political party, or more against the other political party. Opinions were solicited on what was the most important issue in the vote for Congress, whether things in the country were generally going in the right direction, whether their reason for voting for Congress included showing support for George W. Bush, and which political party they trusted to do a better job handling issues such as the situation in Iraq and the economy. Information was collected on whether respondents had been contacted by any organization working in support of a candidate for Congress and if so, which political party they were asked to vote for, which political party best represented their own personal values, and whether the war with Iraq was worth fighting. Demographic variables include sex, age, religious preference, race, education level, voter registration and participation history, political party affiliation, political philosophy, marital status, whether anyone in the household was a veteran, and type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22164.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrcongressional candidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrIraq Waricpsrnational economyicpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrsocial issuesicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22164Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22164.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09060MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09060MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Pre-Election Tracking Poll
[electronic resource]California, 1988
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-10-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR9060NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey was conducted prior to the California primary held on May 10, 1988. Respondents were asked if they were registered to vote, their party designation, if they intended to vote in the Democratic or Republican presidential primary, for whom they would vote if the primary were held that day, toward which candidate they were leaning, the strength of their support, and any candidates they definitely would not vote for. Background information on respondents includes education, age, religion, race, sex, income, voting history, and political orientation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09060.v1
candidatesicpsrvoter preferencesicpsrvoting bahavioricpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9060Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09060.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08999MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08999MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Pre-Election Tracking Poll
[electronic resource]Illinois, 1988
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2008-10-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR8999NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey was conducted prior to the Illinois primary held on March 15, 1988. Respondents were asked if they were registered to vote, their party designation, if they intended to vote in the Democratic or Republican presidential primary, for whom they would vote if the primary were held that day, toward which candidate they were leaning, the strength of their support, and any candidates they definitely would not vote for. Additional questions probed for the respondent's opinions on the Reagan presidency and the two most important issues in the presidential campaign. Background information on respondents includes education, age, religion, race, sex, income, voting history, and political orientation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08999.v1
campaign issuesicpsrReagan Administration (1981-1989)icpsrReagan, Ronaldicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrcandidatesicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8999Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08999.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR24583MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR24583MiAaIMiAaI
ABC News/Washington Post Pre-State of the Union Speech Poll, January 2007
[electronic resource]
ABC News
,
The Washington Post
2009-05-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR24583NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, fielded January 16-19, 2007, is a part of continuing series of monthly polls that
solicit public opinion on various political and social issues.
This poll was conducted prior to President Bush's State of the Union speech
on January 23, and focuses on his proposals
about the war with Iraq, including sending additional United States military forces to Iraq, President Bush's
and Congress' handling of the war with Iraq, and whether the United States did the right thing in going to war
with Iraq.
Respondents were also asked whether they approved of George W. Bush and the way he was handling the presidency
and other issues such as the economy, whether they approved of the way Congress was handling its job, and whether things in the country are on the right track.
Opinions were solicited on Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, the 2008 presidential candidates, whom
respondents would vote for if the 2008 Democratic and Republican primaries and the presidential election were held that
day, and whether an independent commission should be established to investigate and enforce ethics rules for members of
Congress.
Respondents were asked what was the most important problem they would like to see Bush and Congress deal with, whether they
trust Bush or Congress to do a better job handling issues such as the federal budget, and whether Bush or
Congress was taking a stronger leadership role in the government.
Additional questions addressed global warming, Medicare, the national minimum wage, embryonic stem cell research, and Iran.
Demographic information includes sex, age, race, education level, employment status, household income,
religious preference, marital status, whether anyone in the household was a military veteran,
type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), voter registration status, political party affiliation,
political philosophy, and the presence of children under 18 in the household.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24583.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrClinton, BillicpsrClinton, Hillaryicpsrdemocracyicpsrfederal budgeticpsrGiuliani, Rudolphicpsrglobal warmingicpsrpublic opinionicpsrstem cell researchicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrwages and salariesicpsrIraq WaricpsrMcCain, JohnicpsrMedicareicpsrnational economyicpsrObama, BarackicpsrPelosi, Nancyicpsrpolitical ethicsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical speechesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesABC NewsThe Washington PostInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)24583Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR24583.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06143MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1994 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06143MiAaIMiAaI
Activists in the United States Presidential Nomination Process, 1980-1996
[electronic resource]
Alan I. Abramowitz
,
John McGlennon
,
Ronald B. Rapoport
,
Walter J. Stone
2001-08-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1994ICPSR6143NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
dent, money contributed
to political organizations, involvement in the 1996 presidential
campaign and reasons for involvement, party affiliation, and opinions
on such issues as abortion, United States involvement around the
world, the federal budget, foreign imports, affirmative action, term
limits, a national health plan, control of domestic programs,
firearms, and immigration. Respondents were also asked to evaluate
candidates on some of these issues. In addition, respondents were
asked to give their opinions on the economy, the Reform Party, party
positions held, and membership in other organizations. Demographic
characteristics of respondents, such as education, age, sex, race,
income, and religion, are provided.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06143.v2
Democratic Party (USA)icpsrparty delegatesicpsrparty nominationsicpsrpolitical activismicpsrpolitical conventionsicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential campaignsicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrICPSR VI.A. Elites and Leadership, United StatesAbramowitz, Alan I.McGlennon, JohnRapoport, Ronald B.Stone, Walter J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6143Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06143.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34013MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34013MiAaIMiAaI
Afrobarometer Round 4
[electronic resource]The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Uganda, 2008
Robert Sentamu
,
Joseph Ogwapit
,
Andrew Mukiibi
,
Francis Kibirige
,
E. Gyimah-Boadi
,
Carolyn Logan
,
Michael Bratton
,
Robert Mattes
2012-08-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34013NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Afrobarometer project was designed to collect and disseminate information regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, economic reform, civil society, and quality of life. This particular survey was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Uganda. Respondents in a face-to-face interview were asked to rate their president and the president's administration in overall performance, to state the most important issues facing their nation, and to evaluate the effectiveness of certain continental and international institutions. Opinions were gathered on the role of the government in improving the economy, whether corruption existed in local and national government, whether government officials were responsive to problems of the general population, and whether local government officials, the police, the courts, the overall criminal justice system, the National Electoral Commission, and the government broadcasting service could be trusted. Respondents were polled on their knowledge of the government, including the identification of government officials, their level of personal involvement in political, governmental, and community affairs, their participation in national elections, and the inclusiveness of the government. Economic questions addressed the past, present, and future of the country's and the respondents' economic conditions, and respondents' living conditions. Additional topics include the Trust Amnesty Commission, the Trust International Criminal Court, civil society organizations, political parties, political meeting attendance, the conflict in and reconstruction of northern Uganda, and the proposed federation of the East African States. Background variables include age, gender, ethnicity, education, religious affiliation and participation, political party affiliation, language spoken most at home, whether the respondent was the head of household, current and past employment status, whether a close friend or relative had died from AIDS, and language used in interview. In addition, the interviewer's gender, race, and education level is provided.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34013.v1
AIDSicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrdemocracyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrliving conditionsicpsrmacroeconomicsicpsrmarketsicpsrnational interestsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical corruptionicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical systemsicpsrpresidential performaceicpsrpresidentsicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrstandard of livingicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrICPSR XIV.C. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political MattersICPSR XIV. Mass Political Behavior and AttitudesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.C.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC II. Economic DataSentamu, RobertOgwapit, JosephMukiibi, AndrewKibirige, FrancisGyimah-Boadi, E.Logan, CarolynBratton, MichaelMattes, RobertInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34013Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34013.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35547MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35547MiAaIMiAaI
Afrobarometer Round 5
[electronic resource]The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Cape Verde, 2011
Deolinda Reis
,
Jose Semedo
,
Francisco Rodrigues
,
E. Gyimah-Boadi
,
Michael Bratton
,
Robert Mattes
,
Carolyn Logan
,
Boniface Dulani
2015-02-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35547NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Afrobarometer project was designed to collect and disseminate information regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, economic reform, civil society, and quality of life. This particular survey was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Cape Verde. Respondents in a face-to-face interview were asked to rate their president and the president's administration in overall performance, to state the most important issues facing their nation, and to evaluate the effectiveness of certain continental and international institutions. Opinions were gathered on the role of the government in improving the economy, whether corruption existed in government, and whether government officials were responsive to problems of the general population. Respondents were also asked whether local government officials, the police, the army, the courts, the overall criminal justice system, the National Electoral Commission, the Ministry of Finance Tax Official, and political parties could be trusted. Additionally, respondents were polled on their level of freedom, taxes, what kind of society they most wanted to see, equal rights regarding gender, their role in the community, and political action and activities. Economic questions addressed the past, present, and future of the country's and the respondents' economic conditions, and respondents' living conditions. In addition, opinions were sought on a range of additional issues specific to Cape Verde. These issues included living and economic conditions, problems with local public schools, crime, and citizenship. Background variables include age, gender, ethnicity, education, religious affiliation and participation, political party affiliation, language spoken most at home, current and past employment status, and language used in the interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35547.v1
civil societyicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcorruptionicpsrcrimeicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrdemocracyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic reformicpsreducationicpsreducational opportunitiesicpsreducational systemicpsrfear of crimeicpsrfreedomicpsrgendericpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment corruptionicpsrgovernment organizationsicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrhuman servicesicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrlegislaturesicpsrliving conditionsicpsrlocal governmenticpsrmass mediaicpsrnational interestsicpsrnews mediaicpsrpoliceicpsrpolitical actionicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical philosophyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpresidentsicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic interesticpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic schoolsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial environmenticpsrsocial servicesicpsrstandard of livingicpsrtaxesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrICPSR XIV.B.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Political Participation, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR II.A.2. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR XIV.C.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR VIII.B.2. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesReis, DeolindaSemedo, JoseRodrigues, FranciscoGyimah-Boadi, E.Bratton, MichaelMattes, RobertLogan, CarolynDulani, BonifaceInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35547Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35547.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35542MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35542MiAaIMiAaI
Afrobarometer Round 5
[electronic resource]The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Côte d'Ivoire, 2013
Michel Silwé
,
E. Gyimah-Boadi
,
Michael Bratton
,
Robert Mattes
,
Carolyn Logan
,
Boniface Dulani
2015-03-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35542NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that collects and disseminates data regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, the economy, civil society, and related issues. This particular data collection was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Côte d'Ivoire, and includes a number of questions about reconciliation, international relations, and development, designed specifically for the Côte d'Ivoire survey. The data are collected from a nationally representative sample in face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent's choice. Standard topics for the Afrobarometer include attitudes toward and evaluations of democracy, governance and economic conditions, political participation, national identity, and social capital. In addition, Round 5 surveys include special modules on taxation; gender issues; crime, conflict and insecurity; globalization; and social service delivery. The surveys also collect a large set of socio-demographic indicators such as age, gender, education level, poverty level, language and ethnicity, and religious affiliation, as well as political party affiliation. Afrobarometer Round 5 surveys were implemented in 35 countries.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35542.v1
access to informationicpsractivismicpsrbriberyicpsrcitizen attitudesicpsrcitizen participationicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcorruptionicpsrcrimeicpsrdemocracyicpsreconomic changeicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic forecastingicpsreducational needsicpsrelection fraudicpsrelectionsicpsremploymenticpsrfood securityicpsrforeign aidicpsrfreedomicpsrfreedom of speechicpsrfreedom of the pressicpsrgender issuesicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrincomeicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrinfrastructureicpsrjudicial corruptionicpsrliving conditionsicpsrlocal governmenticpsrlocal politicsicpsrmedia influenceicpsrnational electionsicpsrnational interestsicpsrnational politicsicpsrnews mediaicpsrpersonal securityicpsrpolice corruptionicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical corruptionicpsrpolitical interesticpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical perceptionsicpsrpolitical protestsicpsrpolitical violenceicpsrpovertyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprotest demonstrationsicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpunishmenticpsrquality of lifeicpsrreligious behavioricpsrsatisfactionicpsrschoolsicpsrsecurityicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial servicesicpsrstandard of livingicpsrtaxesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoting behavioricpsrwomen in developmenticpsrwomens rightsicpsrICPSR II.A.2. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR XIV.B.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Political Participation, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR VIII.B.2. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR XIV.C.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Nations Other Than the United StatesSilwé, MichelGyimah-Boadi, E.Bratton, MichaelMattes, RobertLogan, CarolynDulani, BonifaceInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35542Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35542.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35548MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35548MiAaIMiAaI
Afrobarometer Round 5
[electronic resource]The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Ghana, 2012
E. Gyimah-Boadi
,
Michael Bratton
,
Robert Mattes
,
Carolyn Logan
,
Boniface Dulani
2015-03-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35548NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that collects and disseminates data regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, the economy, civil society, and related issues. The data are collected from nationally representative samples in face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent's choice. Standard topics for the Afrobarometer include attitudes toward and evaluations of democracy, governance and economic conditions, political participation, national identity, and social capital. In addition, Round 5 surveys included special modules on taxation; gender issues; crime, conflict and insecurity; globalization; and social service delivery. The surveys also collect a large set of socio-demographic indicators such as age, gender, education level, poverty level, language and ethnicity, and religious affiliation, as well as political party affiliation. Afrobarometer Round 5 surveys were implemented in 35 countries. This particular data collection was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Ghana, and also includes a number of "country-specific questions," many of which are oil-related, designed specifically for the Ghana survey.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35548.v1
police corruptionicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical corruptionicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpovertyicpsraccess to informationicpsrbriberyicpsrcellular phonesicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcourtsicpsrcrimeicpsrcorruptionicpsrdemocracyicpsrdeveloping nationsicpsreconomic aidicpsreconomic changeicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrelectionsicpsremploymenticpsrequalityicpsrethicsicpsrethnic identityicpsrfood securityicpsrfreedomicpsrfreedom of speechicpsrfreedom of the pressicpsrgendericpsrgender issuesicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment corruptionicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgovernment servicesicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrincomeicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrinfrastructureicpsrjudicial corruptionicpsrlegislaturesicpsrliving conditionsicpsrlocal electionsicpsrlocal governmenticpsrlocal politicsicpsrmedia useicpsrmedical careicpsrnational electionsicpsrnational interestsicpsrnews mediaicpsroil productionicpsrparliamentary electionsicpsrpoliceicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic schoolsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrrevenueicpsrsanitationicpsrschoolsicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial inequalityicpsrsocial servicesicpsrstandard of livingicpsrtaxesicpsrterm limitsicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrviolenceicpsrwomens rightsicpsrICPSR XIV.B.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Political Participation, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR XIV.C.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR VIII.B.2. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR II.A.2. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, Nations Other Than the United StatesGyimah-Boadi, E.Bratton, MichaelMattes, RobertLogan, CarolynDulani, BonifaceInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35548Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35548.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35551MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35551MiAaIMiAaI
Afrobarometer Round 5
[electronic resource]The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Lesotho, 2012
Lipholo Makhetha
,
Mamochaki Shale
,
E. Gyimah-Boadi
,
Michael Bratton
,
Robert Mattes
,
Carolyn Logan
2015-02-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35551NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that collects and disseminates data regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, the economic, civil society, and related issues. The data are collected from nationally representative samples in face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent's choice. Standard topics for the Afrobarometer include attitudes toward and evaluations of democracy, governance and economic conditions, political participation, national identify, and social capital. In addition, Round 5 surveys included special modules on taxation; gender issues; crime, conflict and insecurity; globalization; and social service delivery. The surveys also collect a large set of socio-demographic indicators such as age, gender, education level, poverty level, language and ethnicity, and religious affiliation, as well as political party affiliation. Afrobarometer Round 5 surveys were implemented in 35 countries. This particular data collection was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Lesotho, and also includes a number of "country-specific questions" designed specifically for the Lesotho survey.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35551.v2
legislaturesicpsrliving conditionsicpsrlocal governmenticpsraccess to informationicpsrbriberyicpsrcellular phonesicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrmedia useicpsrmedical careicpsrnational interestsicpsrnews mediaicpsrpoliceicpsrpolice corruptionicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical corruptionicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpovertyicpsrpoverty programsicpsrpresidentsicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic schoolsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsanitationicpsrschoolsicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial servicesicpsrstandard of livingicpsrtaxesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrviolenceicpsrwomens rightsicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcomputer useicpsrcorruptionicpsrdemocracyicpsrdeveloping nationsicpsreconomic aidicpsreconomic changeicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrelitesicpsremploymenticpsrequalityicpsrethicsicpsrethnic identityicpsrfreedomicpsrfreedom of speechicpsrfreedom of the pressicpsrgendericpsrgender issuesicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment corruptionicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care accessicpsrimmigrationicpsrincomeicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrinfrastructureicpsrInterneticpsrjudicial corruptionicpsrlegal systemsicpsrICPSR XIV.C.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR II.A.2. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR VIII.B.2. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesMakhetha, LipholoShale, MamochakiGyimah-Boadi, E.Bratton, MichaelMattes, RobertLogan, CarolynInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35551Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35551.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35552MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35552MiAaIMiAaI
Afrobarometer Round 5
[electronic resource]The Quality of Democracy and Governance in Liberia, 2012
E. Gyimah-Boadi
,
Michael Bratton
,
Robert Mattes
,
Carolyn Logan
,
Boniface Dulani
2015-03-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35552NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that collects and disseminates data regarding Africans' views on democracy, governance, the economy, civil society, and related issues. This particular data collection was concerned with the attitudes and opinions of the citizens of Liberia, and includes a number of questions related to campaigns, conflict, resolution, and other "country-specific topics" designed specifically for the Liberia survey. The data are collected from nationally representative samples in face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent's choice. Standard topics for the Afrobarometer include attitudes toward and evaluations of democracy, governance and economic conditions, political participation, national identity, and social capital. In addition, Round 5 surveys included special modules on taxation; gender issues; crime, conflict and insecurity; globalization; and social service delivery. The surveys also collect a large set of socio-demographic indicators such as age, gender, education level, poverty level, language and ethnicity, and religious affiliation, as well as political party affiliation. Afrobarometer Round 5 surveys were implemented in 35 countries.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35552.v1
access to informationicpsrbriberyicpsrcellular phonesicpsrcitizenshipicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcommunity participationicpsrcomputer useicpsrcorruptionicpsrcourtsicpsrcrimeicpsrdemocracyicpsrdeveloping nationsicpsreconomic aidicpsreconomic changeicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreducationicpsrelectionsicpsrelitesicpsremploymenticpsrequalityicpsrethicsicpsrethnic identityicpsrfood securityicpsrfreedomicpsrfreedom of speechicpsrfreedom of the pressicpsrgendericpsrgender issuesicpsrgender rolesicpsrgovernmenticpsrgovernment corruptionicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrgovernment servicesicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth care accessicpsrhealth care facilitiesicpsrincomeicpsrincome taxicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrinfrastructureicpsrissuesicpsrjudicial corruptionicpsrlegislaturesicpsrliving conditionsicpsrlocal electionsicpsrlocal governmenticpsrlocal politicsicpsrmedia useicpsrmedical careicpsrnational electionsicpsrnational interestsicpsrpoliceicpsrpolice corruptionicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical corruptionicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpovertyicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpresidentsicpsrpublic confidenceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrpublic schoolsicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsanitationicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial inequalityicpsrsocial servicesicpsrstandard of livingicpsrtaxesicpsrtrust (psychology)icpsrtrust in governmenticpsrviolenceicpsrwomens rightsicpsrICPSR VIII.B.2. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR XIV.C.2. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, Nations Other Than the United StatesICPSR II.A.2. Community and Urban Studies, Studies of Local Politics, Nations Other Than the United StatesGyimah-Boadi, E.Bratton, MichaelMattes, RobertLogan, CarolynDulani, BonifaceInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35552Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35552.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30721MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30721MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Studies (ANES) Panel Recontact Study, 2010
[electronic resource]
American National Election Studies
2011-06-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30721NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The ANES 2010 Panel Recontact Study is a reinterview of the ANES 2008-2009 Panel Study panelists. Those who previously completed at least one ANES wave of the Panel Study before November 2008 and who also completed the November 2008 (post-election) wave were invited to complete a follow-up interview in June 2010. Data collection ended in July 2010. The study was conducted entirely on the Internet from a sample selected and recruited by telephone. It represents United States citizens aged 18 years or older as of election day in November 2008. The questions on the recontact survey covered numerous topics. Many questions were previously asked on earlier waves of the ANES 2008-2009 Panel Study. Topics included interest in politics, cosmopolitanism, efficacy, trust in government, divided government, attitudes toward parties, personality, economic peril, race discrimination, numerous policy attitudes, and income inequality. See the questionnaire in the user guide for question wording. Demographic variables include respondent income, political party affiliation, religiosity, employment status, and household income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30721.v1
candidatesicpsrAfghanistan WaricpsrattitudesicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrgays and lesbiansicpsrglobal warmingicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrillegal immigrantsicpsrimmigration policyicpsrincome taxicpsrIraq Waricpsrjob lossicpsrmilitary personnelicpsrenvironmental attitudesicpsrnational economyicpsrObama, Barackicpsrpersonalityicpsrpolitical activismicpsrpolitical affiliationsicpsrpolitical interesticpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrracial attitudesicpsrracial discriminationicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrterrorismicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvotersicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesFENWAY VII. Studies Recommended for Student UseRCMD X. Political ParticipationAmerican National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30721Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30721.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29182MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29182MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Studies (ANES) Panel Study, 2008-2009
[electronic resource]
American National Election Studies
2011-04-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR29182NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study is a telephone-recruited Internet panel with two cohorts recruited using nearly identical methods. The first cohort was recruited in late 2007 using random-digit-dialing (RDD) methods common to telephone surveys. Prospective respondents were offered $10 per month to complete surveys on the Internet each month for 21 months, from January 2008 through September 2009. Those without a computer and Internet service were offered a free web appliance, MSN TV 2, and free Internet service for the duration of the study. The second cohort was recruited the same way in the summer of 2008 and asked to join the panel beginning in September 2008.
The recruitment interview was conducted by telephone in nearly all cases. A small number of respondents completed the recruitment survey on the Internet after failing to complete a telephone interview. Before the first monthly survey, most respondents also completed an online profile survey consisting primarily of demographic questions.
To minimize panel attrition and conditioning effects, only 7 of the 21 monthly surveys are about politics. Other surveys are about a variety of non-political topics. The panelists answered political questions prepared by ANES in January, February, June, September, October, and November 2008. With certainty, the panel answered more political questions in May 2009.
Note that the 2008-2009 ANES Panel Study is entirely separate from the 2008 ANES
Time Series study, which was conducted using the traditional ANES method of face-to-face interviews before and after the 2008 election. Although there are a few questions common to both studies, the samples and methods are different.
For further details, see the User Guide. Complete documentation is available on the ANES Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29182.v1
Gravel, Mikeicpsrhealth insuranceicpsrHuckabee, MikeicpsrHunter, Duncanicpsrillegal immigrantsicpsrIraq WaricpsrKeyes, AlanicpsrKucinich, Dennisicpsrlocal electionsicpsrMcCain, Johnicpsrglobal warmingicpsrnational economyicpsrnational electionsicpsrnews mediaicpsrnewspapersicpsrObama, BarackicpsrObama, MichelleicpsrPaul, Ronicpsrpolitical activismicpsrpolitical affiliationsicpsrpolitical awarenessicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical interesticpsrpolitical partiesicpsrTancredo, Tomicpsrtelevision newsicpsrterrorismicpsrThompson, FredicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrviolent crimeicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvotersicpsrvoting behavioricpsrabortionicpsrAfghanistan WaricpsrBiden, Joeicpsrborn-again ChristiansicpsrBush, George W.icpsrcandidatesicpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrEdwards, Johnicpsrelectionsicpsrelectronic surveillanceicpsremergency preparednessicpsrfederal governmenticpsrfederal income taxicpsrprimariesicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrRichardson, Billicpsrsame-sex marriageicpsrstate electionsicpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesFENWAY VII. Studies Recommended for Student UseTPDRC I. TerrorismRCMD X. Political ParticipationAmerican National Election StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29182Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29182.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07298MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07298MiAaIMiAaI
American National Election Study, 1970
[electronic resource]
Center for Political Studies
1999-12-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7298NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is part of a time-series collection of national
surveys fielded continuously since 1952. The election studies are
designed to present data on Americans' social backgrounds, enduring
political predispositions, social and political values, perceptions
and evaluations of groups and candidates, opinions on questions of
public policy, and participation in political life. A Black supplement
of 114 respondents is included with the national cross-section of
1,580 respondents. In addition to the usual content, this study
included items related to issues of college unrest, government help to
minority groups, government action against inflation, and pollution
from private industry. The Black respondents were questioned about the
formation of a Black political party. This is the first of the
national election studies to include respondents 18 to 20 years old
and eligible to vote at the time of the interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07298.v2
political partiesicpsrpollutionicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrspecial interest groupsicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrvoter expectationsicpsrvoter historyicpsrAffirmative ActionicpsrAfrican Americansicpsrcampus unresticpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrdomestic policyicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinflationicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrminoritiesicpsrnational electionsicpsrvoting behavioricpsrtrust in governmenticpsrNixon Administration (1969-1974)icpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationCenter for Political StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7298Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07298.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07292MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07292MiAaIMiAaI
American Representation Study, 1958
[electronic resource] Candidate and Constituent, Party
Warren E. Miller
,
Donald E. Stokes
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7292NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This dataset belongs to a three-part study on American
representation conducted shortly before and after the 1958
congressional election (see also AMERICAN REPRESENTATION STUDY, 1958:
CANDIDATES [ICPSR 7226] and AMERICAN REPRESENTATION STUDY, 1958:
CANDIDATE AND CONSTITUENT, INCUMBENCY [ICPSR 7293]). The survey
administered to the candidates was designed to elicit information on
what they considered to be the most important issues of the campaign,
their views on these issues, and their perceptions of the positions of
their constituents. The candidates were also asked what influenced
them, and what they felt influenced the outcome of the
campaign. Derived measures calculate 85th Congress roll-call scores on
social welfare, foreign involvement, and civil rights issues.
Roll-call data and information on committee activities of the
congressmen are also provided. The two combined candidate and
constituent files (this collection and ICPSR 7293) contain the same
candidate information as in ICPSR 7226 but are structured around the
district as the unit of analysis. This data collection provides
candidate and constituent information, organized by party
identification of candidates, while ICPSR 7293 is organized by
incumbency status of the candidates. In addition to the survey
information on the candidates, this collection contains data on
constituents taken from the 1956, 1958, and 1960 AMERICAN NATIONAL
ELECTION STUDIES (ICPSR 7214, 7215, and 7216) for 114 of the 146
districts. Demographic information on candidates includes sex, race,
year of birth, size of birthplace, highest graduate degree, prior
occupations, public offices previously held, several indices of
spatial mobility, religious preference, and ethnic background.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07292.v1
registered votersicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrroll call dataicpsrsocial welfareicpsrUnited States CongressicpsrUnited States House of Representativesicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoter historyicpsrvoter interesticpsrvoting behavioricpsrvoting districtsicpsrcampaign issuesicpsrcampaign strategiesicpsrcandidatesicpsrcivil rightsicpsrcommunicationicpsrcongressional candidatesicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrconservatismicpsrconstituenciesicpsrdecision makingicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrelectoral behavioricpsrforeign policyicpsrgovernment elitesicpsrlegislatorsicpsrliberalismicpsrnational electionsicpsrperceptionsicpsrparty membershipicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical ideologiesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical partisanshipicpsrpolitical perceptionsicpsrpolitical representationicpsrpoliticiansicpsrICPSR XIII.B. Legislative and Deliberative Bodies, Studies of Decision-Making in Deliberative BodiesMiller, Warren E.Stokes, Donald E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7292Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07292.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00027MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00027MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Time Series Statistics for the United States, 1929-1968
[electronic resource]
Douglas A. Norwood
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR27NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study is a 40-year time series of social, economic,
and political indicators at the national level for the United States
in the period 1929-1968. The variables include data on expenditures
from the federal budget by various departments, agencies, and
commissions, the number of employees in the various United States
departments, measures of the political characteristics of the United
States Congress, such as the number of Repuplicans, Democrats, and
"other" party members in the United States Senate and in the House of
Representatives, business and consumer expenditures, and attributes of
the population. Data are also provided on the number per 1,000 of
immigrants to the United States, membership of all the religious
bodies in the United States, labor union membership, total households
in the United States, total civilian labor force, and the number of
the unemployed. Demographic variables provide information on
education, births, and death rates. The unit of analysis is the
year. Variables 2-281 cover the period from 1929-1968 and Variables
282-408 cover only the period from 1947-1968.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00027.v1
church membershipicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrcongressional votingicpsrconsumer expendituresicpsreconomic indicatorsicpsrdemographic statisticsicpsrfederal budgeticpsrfederal electionsicpsrfederal spendingicpsrgovernment agenciesicpsrgovernment employeesicpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrgovernment revenuesicpsrincome distributionicpsrlabor forceicpsrlocal governmenticpsrparty membershipicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrsocial historyicpsrsocial welfareicpsrstate governmenticpsrtwentieth centuryicpsrunemploymenticpsrunion membershipicpsrvoting behavioricpsrUnited States CongressicpsrICPSR VIII.B.1. Governmental Structures, Policies, and Capabilities, Historical and Contemporary Public Policy Indicators, United StatesNorwood, Douglas A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00027.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR05213MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR05213MiAaIMiAaI
Argentina Domestic Violence and Economic Data, 1955-1972
[electronic resource]
Guillermo O'Donnell
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR5213NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains two data files providing measures of
protest violence and economic indicators for Argentina in the period
1955-1972. Part 1, Monthly Protest Data, contains variables on the
number of strikes in different parts of Argentina and in the country
as a whole, type of strike, strike participants such as unions,
workers' organizations, the middle class, and national union
organizations, demonstrations by students, Peronists, the Radical
party, leftists, centrists, rightists, blue and white collar
workers, and other actors, guerilla actions by the People's
Revolutionary Army, the Peronista organizations, and other
organizations, and the duration, nature of violence, and total dead
or seriously wounded in the protest events. Part 2, Economic Data,
consists of economic indicators, such as government revenues and
expenditures, wages and salaries, cost of wholesale Argentine
products and imported products, inflation rates, exchange
rates, balance of payments, and cost of living.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR05213.v1
economic indicatorsicpsrfatalitiesicpsrinjuriesicpsrinternal political conflicticpsrlabor strikesicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical strikesicpsrprotest demonstrationsicpsrsocial protesticpsrstudent protestsicpsraggressionicpsrcivil disordersicpsrIDRC I. Conflict DataIDRC II. Economic DataICPSR III.A. Conflict, Aggression, Violence, Wars, Conflict and Stability Within NationsO'Donnell, GuillermoInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)5213Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR05213.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07393MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07393MiAaIMiAaI
Australian National Political Attitudes, 1969
[electronic resource]
Donald Aitkin
,
Michael Kahan
,
Donald E. Stokes
2001-10-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7393NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This post-election study is the second wave of a larger
study of Australian political attitudes. The present study focused on
the 1969 national election. Questions elicited respondents' opinions
on the political parties, leaders of the main parties, and various
political issues. Party identification and party vote information,
along with data on election campaign activity, were also obtained. The
study includes standard demographic information for each respondent,
such as age, sex, marital status, level of education, annual income,
religion, birthplace.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07393.v1
national electionsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical leadersicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesAitkin, DonaldKahan, MichaelStokes, Donald E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7393Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07393.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR05019MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR05019MiAaIMiAaI
Black Africa Handbook
[electronic resource]
Donald Morrison
,
Robert Mitchell
,
John Paden
,
Michael Stevenson
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR5019NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains data on the political, social,
economic, religious, ecological, and demographic characteristics
of 32 Black African nations in the late 1950s and 1960s. Data
are provided on political regime characteristics, such as the
existence and nature of political parties, elections, the
nature of the judicial system, the extent of government
influence, and the occurrence of riots, civil violence,
terrorist activities, civil wars, irredentist movements, and
coup d'etats. Economic variables provide information on
government revenues, government expenditures, gross domestic
capital formation, public investment as a percentage of the
gross domestic product (GDP), gross national product (GNP),
defense budgets, energy, investment, labor, number of wage
earners as a percentage of active population, industrial
production, electricity production, per capita energy
consumption, educational expenditures, economic welfare,
consumer price index, international economic aid, total
international trade, imports and exports, agriculture,
and membership in major African multilateral economic
organizations. Also included is information on the military
and security systems, Africanization of the army officer
corps, international relations, membership in nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs), communication and transportation,
and social welfare. Other variables provide information
on population estimates and characteristics, population
density, settlement patterns, cultural pluralism, language,
religion, primary and secondary school enrollment, family
organization, patrilineal kin groups, class stratification,
and the number of physicians per population.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR05019.v1
population densityicpsrpopulation estimatesicpsrprice indexesicpsrpublic transportationicpsrreligionicpsrriotsicpsrsecurity systemsicpsrsocial welfareicpsrurbanizationicpsragricultural developmenticpsrcivil disobedienceicpsrcivil warsicpsrconflicticpsrcoup d'etaticpsrdefense spendingicpsrdeveloping nationsicpsreconomic indicatorsicpsreducation expendituresicpsreducational populationsicpsrelectoral systemsicpsrelectricityicpsrelementary educationicpsrenergy consumptionicpsrenergy productionicpsrethnicityicpsrexportsicpsrfamiliesicpsrforeign aidicpsrgovernment expendituresicpsrgovernment revenuesicpsrGross Domestic ProducticpsrGross National Producticpsrhigher educationicpsrimportsicpsrindustrial productionicpsrinternational relationsicpsrinternational tradeicpsrlabor forceicpsrlanguageicpsrmass mediaicpsrnongovernmental organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical systemsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC I. Conflict DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC IV. Environmental DataMorrison, DonaldMitchell, RobertPaden, JohnStevenson, MichaelInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)5019Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR05019.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09019MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09019MiAaIMiAaI
British Columbia Election Study, 1979-1980
[electronic resource]
David J. Elkins
,
Donald E. Blake
,
Richard Johnston
2007-01-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR9019NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey consists of interviews with 1,051 respondents
conducted in the summer and fall of 1979 following the May 10
(provincial) and May 22 (federal) elections, and 808 telephone
reinterviews in February 1980 immediately after the federal election
of February 18, 1980. There are three types of data provided in this
collection. The first includes extensive workforce participation
information for respondent and household members, in-depth analysis of
issue positions, links to party and other measures of voting, party
identification, political participation, political culture, and
strategic or "sophisticated" voting. The second type of information
involves electoral data from the polling divisions and constituencies
in which respondents were interviewed. The third type of data pertains
to the social composition of neighborhoods and was derived from the
1976 Census. Demographic information on each respondent includes age,
sex, race, religion, birthplace, education, language spoken at home,
and first language learned.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09019.v2
provincial politicsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial indicatorsicpsrvote counticpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrelection returnsicpsrfederal electionsicpsrlabor forceicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrprovincial electionsicpsrcensus dataicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesElkins, David J.Blake, Donald E.Johnston, RichardInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9019Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09019.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07869MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07869MiAaIMiAaI
British Election Study
[electronic resource]1969-1970, February 1974 Panel
Ivor Crewe
,
Bo Saerlvik
,
James Alt
2006-01-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7869NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
surveys of the British electorate, begun by David Butler and Donald
Stokes at Nuffield College, Oxford, in 1963, and continued at the
University of Essex. This panel study about the British general
election of February 1974 was conducted with a sample of electors in
80 constituencies who had previously been interviewed twice, once in
1969 and again after the 1970 general election. This data collection
contains information gathered in the third wave of the study, known as
the February 1974 cross-section panel survey. It includes data
gathered from participants who were interviewed in 1970, of whom about
half had also been interviewed in 1969. As with other surveys in the
series, electors in Northern Ireland and the Scottish Highlands and
Islands were excluded from the sampling frame. Interviewed in
March-April 1974, respondents answered questions relating to the mass
media (e.g., attention to newspapers and television and perceived bias
in newspapers), their first and second choices in the 1974 general
election, and their opinions of the Conservative, Labour, Liberal,
Scottish Nationalist, and Plaid Cymru political parties (e.g.,
perceived difference among parties, knowledge of party
position/record, party identification, and the strength of party
preference). Respondents were asked for their views on a range of
social issues relating to domestic and foreign affairs, with emphasis
on the economy and the Common Market. Respondents were then asked how
the parties stood on each issue, and how much that influenced the
respondent's vote. Some of the issues included rising prices, strikes
in general, the miners' strike, taxation, the Common Market, social
services, nationalization, wage control, and the amount of power held
by unions and by big business. Respondents were also asked for their
perceptions of class conflict and their predictions for Britain's
future economy. Finally, respondents rated the political parties and
several politicians, and commented on the effect of government on
their own well-being. Background information includes age, sex,
marital status, place of residence during childhood, subjective class,
forced subjective class, family class, tenure, type and length of
residence, employment status, degree of responsibility in and training
for job (respondent and spouse), experience of unemployment in
household, income trade union membership (respondent and spouse), and
socioeconomic group.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07869.v1
political changeicpsrpolitical influencesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrvoting patternsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrEuropean Economic Communityicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinternational relationsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmass mediaicpsrnational electionsicpsrpersonal financesicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorCrewe, IvorSaerlvik, BoAlt, JamesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7869Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07869.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07872MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07872MiAaIMiAaI
British Election Study
[electronic resource]EEC Referendum Survey, 1975
Bo Saerlvik
,
Ivor Crewe
,
David Robertson
2006-01-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7872NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
surveys of the British electorate, begun by David Butler and Donald
Stokes at Nuffield College, Oxford, in 1963, and continued at the
University of Essex. In the EEC Referendum Survey, 2,117 British
electors responded to a questionnaire that was mailed to all
respondents interviewed in the BRITISH ELECTION STUDY, OCTOBER 1974,
CROSS-SECTION (ICPSR 7870) and, thus, it constitutes the third wave of
a panel, including also the FEBRUARY 1974 CROSS-SECTION (ICPSR
7868). As with other surveys in the series, electors in Northern
Ireland and the Scottish Highlands and Islands were excluded from the
sampling frame. The three purposes of the survey were (1) to collect
information on voting in the referendum about Great Britain's entry
into the Common Market held in the spring of 1974, (2) to collect data
on respondents' views of the parties and politics in general (as in
the earlier panel waves), and (3) to include questions about the
referendum as such, i.e., as a constitutional form of decision-making.
Respondents answered questions regarding readership of official
leaflets on the European Economic Community (EEC), attitudes toward
future referendum votes, expected effect of Britain's membership in
the EEC (in particular, on prices), their vote in the referendum,
strength of opinion about the EEC, difference made to voting decision
by new terms negotiated by the government, attitude toward Labour
Government's handling of rising prices, party identification, and
strength of party support. Respondents were also asked to rate the
Conservative, Labour, Liberal, and Scottish National political
parties. Finally, respondents were asked to reveal their degree of
trust in the parties and their knowledge of orientations of various
power groups toward the EEC.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07872.v1
referendumicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrEuropean Economic Communityicpsrvoting patternsicpsrWilson, Haroldicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinformation sourcesicpsrinternational relationsicpsrlabor forceicpsrnational electionsicpsrparty loyaltyicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrprice controlsicpsrpricesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataSaerlvik, BoCrewe, IvorRobertson, DavidInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7872Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07872.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07868MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07868MiAaIMiAaI
British Election Study
[electronic resource]February 1974, Cross-Section
Ivor Crewe
,
Bo Saerlvik
,
James Alt
2008-01-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7868NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection is part of a continuing series of
surveys of the British electorate, begun by David Butler and Donald
Stokes at Nuffield College, Oxford, in 1963, and continued at the
University of Essex. This cross-section study was designed to yield a
representative sample of eligible voters in Great Britain near the
time of the general election on February 28, 1974. As with other
surveys in the series, electors in Northern Ireland and the Scottish
Highlands and Islands were excluded from the sampling frame. Personal
interviews with 2,462 members of the British electorate took place in
two waves between March and May. Respondents answered questions
relating to their attitudes toward the general election and the
strength of their political opinions and interest. Respondents were
asked about their trust in government and their opinions of the
Conservative, Labour, Liberal, Scottish Nationalist, and Plaid Cymru
political parties (e.g., perceived differences among them, and
knowledge and perception of party position/record). Respondents were
also asked to reveal their past voting behavior (e.g., their first and
second choices in the general election, other parties considered,
choices in the 1970 and 1966 elections, frequency of discussion about
politics, and direction and strength of party identification).
Respondents were then asked for their views on the general election
results along a variety of dimensions. Respondents also identified
groups with too much or too little political power, as well as groups
with whom they themselves identified. They were asked to rate several
political parties and politicians and to express their views regarding
a range of social issues relating to domestic and foreign affairs,
including the mass media (e.g., attention to television and newspapers
and perceived bias in newspapers), opinions on prices, strikes in
general, the miners' strike, pensions, the Common Market,
nationalization, social services, Communists, devolution, income tax
and wage controls, and Britain's dependency on other countries (i.e.,
the United States, Russia, France, Germany, and Australia).
Respondents were also asked to predict incomes, unemployment, and
Britain's future economic situation. Other sets of questions probed
for opinions on social mores and life satisfaction (e.g., life in
general, personal financial status, today's standards, local
government, change, and getting ahead). Background information
includes age, sex, marital status, employment status, socioeconomic
group, experience of unemployment in household, income, occupation,
degree of supervision, and responsibility in job (for self and
spouse). Information on father's vote, party choice, strength of party
support, occupation, employment status, and social grade is also
included.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07868.v2
social valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrvoting patternsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrEuropean Economic Communityicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinternational relationsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmass mediaicpsrnational electionsicpsrpersonal financesicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical influencesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrquality of lifeicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorCrewe, IvorSaerlvik, BoAlt, JamesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7868Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07868.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07870MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07870MiAaIMiAaI
British Election Study
[electronic resource]October 1974, Cross-Section
Ivor Crewe
,
Bo Saerlvik
,
James Alt
2006-01-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7870NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The October 1974 cross-section is part of a continuing
series of surveys of the British electorate, begun by David Butler and
Donald Stokes at Nuffield College, Oxford, in 1963, and continued at
the University of Essex. For the October 1974 Cross-Section survey,
2,365 British electors were interviewed, of which 1,674 had also been
interviewed in the February 1974 cross-section, although this is NOT a
panel file. As with other surveys in the series, electors in Northern
Ireland and the Scottish Highlands and Islands were excluded from the
sampling frame. Interviewed in October 1974 (and stretching to January
1975 in order to boost the response rate), respondents answered
questions relating to the mass media (e.g., attention to newspapers
and television and perceived bias in newspapers), their first and
second choices in the October 1974 general election, and their
opinions of the Conservative, Labour, Liberal, Scottish Nationalist,
and Plaid Cymru political parties (e.g., perceived difference among
parties, knowledge of party position/record, party identification, and
the strength of party preference). Respondents also were asked for
their views on a range of social issues relating to domestic and
foreign affairs, with emphasis on the economy and the Common
Market. Respondents were then asked how the parties stood on each
issue, and how much that influenced the respondent's vote. Some of the
issues include rising prices, strikes, unemployment, pensions,
housing, North Sea oil, taxation, the Common Market, social services,
nationalization, wage controls, and the amount of power held by unions
and by big business. Respondents were also asked for their attitudes
about their personal financial status, change/getting ahead, life in
general, today's standards, local government, their own occupation,
and the government's achievements. They also gave their predictions
for Britain's future economy and of the outcome of the October
election, and compared Britain's government and industry with those of
Europe. Respondents were asked if they felt the following had gone too
far: sex and race equality, police handling of demonstrations, law
breakers, pornography, modern teaching methods, abortion, welfare
benefits, and military cuts. Respondents were then asked to agree or
disagree with the suggestions that government should: establish
comprehensives, increase cash to health service, repatriate
immigrants, control land, increase foreign aid, toughen on crime,
control pollution, give workers more say, curb Communists, spend on
poverty, redistribute wealth, decentralize power, and preserve the
countryside. Background information includes age, sex, marital status,
place of residence during childhood, subjective class, forced
subjective class, family class, tenure, type and length of residence,
employment status, degree of responsibility in and training for job
(respondent and spouse), experience of unemployment in household,
income, trade union membership (respondent and spouse), and
socioeconomic group.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07870.v1
economic conditionsicpsrEuropean Economic Communityicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinternational relationsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmass mediaicpsrnational electionsicpsrpersonal financesicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical influencesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrvoting patternsicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorCrewe, IvorSaerlvik, BoAlt, JamesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7870Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07870.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07871MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07871MiAaIMiAaI
British Election Study
[electronic resource]October 1974, Scottish Cross-Section
Ivor Crewe
,
Bo Saerlvik
,
James Alt
2006-01-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7871NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The October 1974 Scottish cross-section is part of a
continuing series of surveys of the British electorate, begun by David
Butler and Donald Stokes at Nuffield College, Oxford, in 1963, and
continued at the University of Essex. Respondents were interviewed
between October 15, 1974 and January 20, 1975. Some of the respondents
had been interviewed in the February 1974 cross-section or in the
October 1974 cross-section, but the majority of respondents were first
interviewed in the Scottish cross-section. For the Scottish
cross-section, respondents answered questions relating to the mass
media (e.g., attention to newspapers and television and perceived bias
in newspapers), their first and second choices in the October 1974
general election, and their opinions of the Conservative, Labour,
Liberal, and Scottish Nationalist political parties (e.g., perceived
differences among parties, knowledge of party position/record, party
identification, and the strength of party preference). Respondents
also were asked for their views on a range of social issues relating
to domestic and foreign affairs, with emphasis on the economy and the
Common Market. Respondents were then asked how the parties stood on
each issue, and how much that influenced the respondent's vote. Some
of the issues included rising prices, strikes, unemployment, pensions,
housing, North Sea oil, the Common Market, social services,
nationalization, wage controls, voluntary agreements, devolution, the
Scottish Assembly, and Scottish Government. Respondents were then
asked to agree or disagree with the suggestions that government
should: establish comprehensives, increase cash to health service,
repatriate immigrants, control land, increase foreign aid, toughen on
crime, control pollution, give workers more say, curb Communists,
spend on poverty, redistribute wealth, decentralize power, preserve
the countryside, and maintain Catholic schools. Respondents were also
asked for their attitudes about their personal financial status,
change/getting ahead, life in general, today's standards, local
government, their own occupations, and the government's achievements.
They also gave their predictions for Britain's future economy and of
the outcome of the October election, and compared Britain's government
and industry with those of Europe. Background information includes
age, sex, marital status, religion, place of residence during
childhood, subjective class, forced subjective class, family class,
housing tenure, type and length of residence, employment status,
degree of responsibility in and training for job (respondent and
spouse), experience of unemployment in household, income, trade union
membership (respondent and spouse), and socioeconomic group.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07871.v1
voting behavioricpsrvoting patternsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrEuropean Economic Communityicpsrgovernment performanceicpsrinternational relationsicpsrlife satisfactionicpsrmass mediaicpsrnational electionsicpsrnationalismicpsrpersonal financesicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical changeicpsrpolitical influencesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial changeicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial valuesicpsrsocioeconomic statusicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesCrewe, IvorSaerlvik, BoAlt, JamesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7871Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07871.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03974MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03974MiAaIMiAaI
British Election Timing Data, 1900-2001
[electronic resource]
Alastair Smith
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3974NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This research project explored when governments call
elections and how the timing of elections influences the electoral
result. In many parliamentary systems, the timing of the next election
is at the discretion of the current government. Rather than waiting for
the end of their term, leaders are free to call elections when it is
advantageous to them and when they expect to win. This project was
designed to use game theory to model how leaders decide whether to call
elections based on their expectations about future performance. The data
collected for this study reflect the timing of the British General
Elections. In particular, this study addressed five research questions:
(1) When are elections called? (2) What are the electoral implications
of the timing of an election? (3) How are election timing and subsequent
post-electoral economic performance related? (4) How does the election
timing affect the length of the campaign? and (5) How does the London
stock market respond to the announcement of elections? The data cover
the time span from 1900 to 2001, although most of the files focus on the
period from August 1, 1945, to June 13, 2001. Part 1 (Dates of Key
Political Events Data) contains the dates of key political events, such
as elections, first meetings of parliament, dissolutions, announcements
of an election, by-elections, shifts in party allegiances, confidence
votes, or changes in Prime Minister. Additional variables in Part 1
include whether there is a minority government or coalition government,
percentage share of the vote by party type, number of seats by party
type, and election turnout. Part 2 (By-Elections Data) includes the
change in seats as a result of by-elections. Variables include the date
of the by-election, electoral district, and change in seats by political
parties. Part 3 (Change in Party Allegiance Data) contains information
about the date of the allegiance shift, the electoral district, and
defections to and from various political parties. Part 4 (Public Opinion
Data) includes Gallup public opinion data on voting intentions, approval
of government record, and approval of Prime Minister and opposition
leader. Part 5 (Basic Economic Variables) contains basic economic data
for the United Kingdom, such as various measures of gross domestic
product and change in retail price index. Part 6 (Monthly Inflation
Data) contains monthly inflation data as measured by the percentage
change in retail price index. Part 7 (Unemployment Data) consists of
monthly, quarterly, and yearly unemployment data. Part 8 (Stock Market
Data) includes data on the United Kingdom market index, United States
Dow Jones industrial average, Standard and Poors' composite index, the
Financial Times 500 stock index, and Datastream's measure of British
funds on the London Exchange. Part 9 (Financial Times 30 Share Index
Data) contains the Financial Times 30 close and the volume of bargains.
Lastly, Part 10 (Newspaper Stories Data) consists of counts of newspaper
stories relating to the next general election.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03974.v1
political leadersicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrelectionsicpsrgovernmenticpsrparliamentary electionsicpsrparty changeicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR VI.B. Elites and Leadership, Nations Other Than the United StatesSmith, AlastairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3974Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03974.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03898MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03898MiAaIMiAaI
British Social Attitudes Survey, 1999
[electronic resource]
National Centre for Social Research
2004-07-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3898NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey is part of a continuing series designed to
monitor trends in a wide range of social attitudes in Great Britain. The
British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA) is similar in purpose to the
General Social Survey carried out by the National Opinion Research
Center (NORC) in the United States. The BSA questionnaire has two parts,
one administered by an interviewer and the other completed by the
respondent. As in the past, the 1999 interview questionnaire contained a
number of "core" questions covering the major topic areas of defense,
the economy, labor market participation, and the welfare state. The 1999
self-enumerated questionnaire was devoted to a series of questions on a
range of social, economic, political, and moral issues. Topics covered
(by section) are: (1) newspaper readership, (2) party identification,
(3) housing, (4) public spending and social welfare, (5) health, (6)
economic activity and labor market, (7) English nationalism, (8)
constitutional issues, (9) begging, (10) religion, (11) administration,
(12) countryside, (13) transport, (14) education, and (15) taste and
decency. An international initiative funded by the Nuffield Foundation,
the International Social Survey Program (ISSP), also contributed a
module to the BSA. The topic of the ISSP module in this collection was
social inequality. Additional demographic data gathered included age,
gender, education, occupation, household income, marital status, social
class, and religious and political affiliations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03898.v1
attitudesicpsrconstitutionsicpsrdefense (military)icpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic issuesicpsreducationicpsrgendericpsrgovernment spendingicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrlabor marketsicpsrnational economyicpsrnationalismicpsrnews mediaicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrreligious denominationsicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial inequalityicpsrsocial issuesicpsrtransportationicpsrtrendsicpsrvaluesicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC I. Conflict DataIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC V. Health DataNational Centre for Social ResearchInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3898Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03898.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03899MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03899MiAaIMiAaI
British Social Attitudes Survey, 2000
[electronic resource]
National Centre for Social Research
2004-08-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3899NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey is part of a continuing series designed to
monitor trends in a wide range of social attitudes in Great
Britain. The British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA) is similar in
purpose to the General Social Survey carried out by the National
Opinion Research Center (NORC) in the United States. The BSA
questionnaire has two parts, one administered by an interviewer and
the other completed by the respondent. As in the past, the 2000
interview questionnaire contained a number of "core" questions
covering the major topic areas of defense, the economy, labor market
participation, and the welfare state. The 2000 self-enumerated
questionnaire was devoted to a series of questions on a range of
social, economic, political, and moral issues. Topics covered are:
(1) political attitudes, (2) democracy and political participation,
(3) constitutional change, (4) social trust, (5) public spending and
welfare, (6) health care, (7) labor market issues, (8) cohabitation
and marriage, (9) teenage pregnancies, (10) education, (11)
transportation, and (12) genetics. An international initiative funded
by the Nuffield Foundation, the International Social Survey Program
(ISSP), also contributed a module to the BSA. The topic of the ISSP
module in this collection was the environment. Additional demographic
data gathered included age, gender, education, occupation, household
income, marital status, social class, and religious and political
affiliations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03899.v1
health careicpsrincomeicpsrlabor marketsicpsrmarriageicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrreligious denominationsicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrteenage pregnanciesicpsrtransportationicpsrtrendsicpsrvaluesicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic issuesicpsreducationicpsrenvironmenticpsrgendericpsrgeneticsicpsrgovernment spendingicpsrattitudesicpsrconstitutional changeicpsrconstitutionsicpsrdefense (military)icpsrIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC V. Health DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC I. Conflict DataIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC IV. Environmental DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesNational Centre for Social ResearchInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3899Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03899.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03900MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03900MiAaIMiAaI
British Social Attitudes Survey, 2001
[electronic resource]
National Centre for Social Research
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3900NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey is part of a continuing series designed to
monitor trends in a wide range of social attitudes in Great
Britain. The British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA) is similar in
purpose to the General Social Survey carried out by the National
Opinion Research Center (NORC) in the United States. The main BSA
questionnaire (Part 1) has two parts, one administered by an
interviewer and the other completed by the respondent. As in the past,
the 2001 interview questionnaire contained a number of "core"
questions covering the major topic areas of defense, the economy,
labor market participation, and the welfare state. The 2001
self-enumerated questionnaire was devoted to a series of questions on
a range of social, economic, political, and moral issues. Topics
covered are: (1) political attitudes, (2) public spending and welfare,
(3) health care, (4) health and safety in the workplace, (5) national
identity, (6) education, (7) drugs, and (8) transport. An
international initiative funded by the Nuffield Foundation, the
International Social Survey Program (ISSP), also contributed a module
to the BSA. The topic of the ISSP module in this collection was social
networks. Additional demographic data gathered included age, gender,
education, occupation, household income, marital status, social class,
and religious and political affiliations. The 2001 survey also
produced a second data file containing information on socio-economic
classifications. With the 2001 census, National Statistics changed
their coding scheme of occupations from SOC90 to SOC2000. In order to
assess how consistent the new coding scheme was with the old one, one
third of the 2001 BSA sample (version C) was coded using both the
SOC90 and the SOC2000 schemes. Part 2 of this collection contains the
variables from this experiment.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03900.v1
attitudesicpsrdefense (military)icpsrdrugsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic issuesicpsreducationicpsrgendericpsrgovernment spendingicpsrhealth careicpsrincomeicpsrlabor marketsicpsrnational economyicpsrnational identityicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrreligious denominationsicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial networksicpsrtransportationicpsrtrendsicpsrvaluesicpsrwelfare servicesicpsrwork environmenticpsrworkplacesicpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XVI.B. Social Indicators, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC I. Conflict DataIDRC II. Economic DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsNational Centre for Social ResearchInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3900Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03900.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23040MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23040MiAaIMiAaI
Building the RePass PTR Measure of Ideology
[electronic resource]
David RePass
2008-08-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR23040NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In the article "Searching for Voters along the Liberal-Conservative Continuum: The Infrequent Ideologue and the Missing Middle," the author presents a measure which can ascertain the ideological orientation of American voters. The measure identifies which voters are liberals, which are conservatives, and which are middle-of-the-roaders. The measure combines responses to four variables that can be found in most American National Elections Study (ANES) datasets since 1972. This archived document is a write-up of the exact method used to build the measure. The instructions also include the SPSS syntax used.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23040.v1
beliefsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical systemsicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrvotersicpsrvoting attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrconservatismicpsrConservative PartyicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrelectionsicpsrLiberal Partyicpsrliberalismicpsrparty identificationicpsrpolitical ideologiesicpsrICPSR XVIII. Replication DatasetsRePass, DavidInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23040Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23040.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08158MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08158MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1977-1978 and 1979-1980
[electronic resource]
Federal Election Commission
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8158NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection offers detailed tabulations of
political campaign expenditures and contributions. Party and non-party
committee information provided in parts 1-8 includes the committee name
and special interest group designation, gross receipts, transfers,
loans, both cash and in-kind contributions, gross disbursements, debts,
contributions to House, Senate, and Presidential candidates, and
expenditures made on behalf of those candidates. For parts 9 and 10,
the House and Senate files, data are supplied on candidate name,
incumbency status, party, receipts, transfers, disbursements, number
and dollar amounts of individual contributions, contributions from
major parties, from corporations, and from labor, independent
expenditures for and against the candidate, and percentage of the
November 1980 general election vote received. Parts 11 and 12, the
Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaigns files, contain data on candidate
name and party, total receipts, transfers, exempt fundraising, federal
matching funds, contributions from candidate and other sources,
independent expenditures for and against the candidate, debts, and
total expenditures made in each state by candidates receiving federal
matching funds. Part 13 specifies for each state the legal spending
limit in 1980 for candidates eligible to receive federal matching
funds.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08158.v1
campaignsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrelectionsicpsrlobbyistsicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpolitical activitiesicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical system charactericticsicpsrsenatorial electionsicpsrUnited StatesicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8158Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08158.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06260MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1994 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06260MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1978-1990
[electronic resource] Longitudinal Political Action Committee (PAC) Data
Federal Election Commission
1994-10-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1994ICPSR6260NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection provides a longitudinal summary compilation
of political action committee (PAC) campaign contributions previously
released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). These data, made
available by the Federal Election Commission, were taken directly from
campaign finance reports filed by PACs, which are required to file such
information under the federal election laws. This collection contains
one record for each PAC and covers the years 1978-1990. Variables
include total contributions made to incumbents and nonincumbents,
Republicans and Democrats, House and Senate candidates, candidates
running and candidates not running, and general election winners and
losers.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06260.v1
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6260Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06260.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06335MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1995 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06335MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1978-1992
[electronic resource] Longitudinal Political Action Committee (PAC) Data
Federal Election Commission
1995-12-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1995ICPSR6335NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection provides a longitudinal summary compilation
of political action committee (PAC) campaign contributions previously
released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). These data were
taken directly from campaign finance reports filed by PACs, which are
required to file such information under the federal election laws. This
collection contains one record for each PAC. Variables include total
contributions made to incumbents and nonincumbents, Republicans and
Democrats, House and Senate candidates, candidates running and
candidates not running, and general election winners and losers.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06335.v1
campaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrcandidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6335Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06335.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08238MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08238MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1981-1982
[electronic resource]
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8238NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
According to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (as
amended), political party and non-party committees must limit their
campaign spending and report their expenditures to the Federal
Election Commission (FEC). The information collected by the FEC
outlines the party and non-party committee expenditures for each
candidate supported and also presents the data by candidate and House
or Senate position sought. This data collection is contained in six
files. Party data are contained in two files: a spread file that
contains a record for each party committee in alphabetical order by
committee ID number, and a cross-tabs file that contains one or more
records for each party committee, organized first by committee ID
number and then by candidate ID number. Non-party and House/Senate
data are also contained in a spread file and a cross-tabs file, both
organized in the same manner as the party files. Candidates are
designated by a candidate ID number that includes the federal office
sought (coded "S" for Senate or "H" for House) and the state in which
the candidate ran. Specific variables record information on total
receipts and the amounts of contributions from corporations, labor
organizations, membership and trade associations, and health-related
organizations. Variables also detail the committees' amount of
available cash, debts owed to and by organizations, amount of in-kind
contributions, and expenditures.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08238.v1
United States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrcandidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8238Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08238.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08511MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1986 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08511MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1983-1984
[electronic resource]
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1986ICPSR8511NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Detailed data on campaign contributions and expenditures on
behalf of or against political candidates are included in this
collection. Information provided for United States Congressional
campaigns includes the candidate's name, incumbency status, party
affiliation, receipts, disbursements, contributions from the candidate,
loans, debts, aggregate contributions by amount and source, and
independent expenditures for and against the candidate. Data on party
and non-party political committees include the committee name,
special-interest group classification, receipts, cash and in-kind
contributions made and received, disbursements, debts, and total
expenditures for and against House, Senate, and Presidential
candidates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08511.v1
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8511Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08511.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09313MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09313MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1983-1984
[electronic resource] Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9313NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and are
taken directly from campaign finance reports filed by candidates,
political committees, and others required to file under the federal
election laws. The files are essentially copies of the FEC's on-line
computer files for the 1983-1984 election cycle. The Candidate Master
File (Part 1) contains a record for each registered candidate for
federal office. It includes the candidate's name, address, party
affiliation, incumbent/challenger status, identification number of the
principal campaign committee, office sought, and election year. The
Committee Master File (Part 2) contains a record for each registered
committee for federal office. Information provided includes the
committee's identification number, name, address, treasurer's name,
committee designation and type, party affiliation, report filing
frequency, special interest group category and connected organization's
name, and multicandidate committee status. The Detailed Report File
(Part 3) contains one record for each separate reporting period for
each FEC committee and, as such, is the source for longitudinal
information about committee financial activity during the 1983-1984
election cycle. Information presented in the file includes the
political committee identification number, the report year and type,
the time period covered by the report, total receipts and
disbursements, beginning and end cash balances, debts owed by and to
the committee, individual, political, and candidate contributions,
transfers from affiliated committees, loans received and payments made,
and refunds. The Itemized PAC Contribution File (Part 4) contains one
record for each type of contributor for each reporting period.
Information covered in this file includes the type and year of the
report, the time period covered by the report, total contributions, net
contributions, total contribution refunds, net operating expenditures,
cash on hand, debts and obligations owed by the committee, debts and
obligations owed to the committee, contributions from individuals, and
loans made or guaranteed by the candidate.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09313.v2
legislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrcandidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9313Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09313.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08939MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08939MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1985-1986
[electronic resource] Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR8939NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and are
taken directly from campaign finance reports filed by candidates,
political committees, and others who are required to file under the
federal election laws. The files are essentially copies of the FEC's
on-line computer files for the 1985-1986 election cycle. The Candidate
Master File (Part 1) contains a record for each registered candidate
for federal office. It includes the candidate's name, address, party
affiliation, incumbent/challenger status, the identification number of
the principal campaign committee, the office sought, and the election
year. The Committee Master File (Part 2) contains a record for each
registered committee for federal office. The information provided
includes the committee's identification number, name, address,
treasurer's name, committee designation and type, party affiliation,
report filing frequency, special interest group category and connected
organization's name, and multicandidate committee status. The Itemized
PAC Contribution File (Part 3) presents all transactions (contributions
or disbursements) by a political committee for or on behalf of/in
opposition to a candidate for federal office or his/her authorized
committee occurring during the 1985-1986 election cycle. Items include
whether the transaction was made in connection with a 1985-1986
primary, general, special or runoff election, or with a prior or future
election, the date and amount of transaction, and identification number
of the filer on whose behalf the transaction took place. The Detailed
Report File (Part 4) contains one record for each separate reporting
period for each FEC committee and, as such, is the source for
longitudinal information about committee financial activity during the
1985-1986 election cycle. Information presented in the file includes
the political committee identification number, the report year and
type, the time period covered by the report, total receipts and
disbursements, beginning and end cash balances, debts owed by and to
the committee, individual, political, and candidate contributions,
transfers from affiliated committees, loans received and payments made,
and refunds.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08939.v1
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8939Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08939.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08937MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08937MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1985-1986
[electronic resource] Reports on Financial Activity (RFA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR8937NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are produced in conjunction with Federal Election
Commission (FEC) Reports On Financial Activity (RFA) and are taken
directly from campaign finance reports filed by political committees
and others who are required to file under the federal election laws.
The data present summary information concerning filers' gross receipts,
disbursements, debts, cash on hand, etc. They also include information
on particular party and nonparty committee support of individual
candidates. The data for United States congressional campaigns supply
summarized information about the campaign, including the candidate's
name, incumbency status, party affiliation, receipts, disbursements,
contributions from the candidate, loans, debts, aggregate contributions
by amount and source, and independent expenditures for and against the
candidate. The party and nonparty political committee data contain
summary information for committees including the committee name,
special-interest group classification, receipts, cash and in-kind
contributions made and received, disbursements, debts, and total
expenditures for and against House and Senate candidates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08937.v1
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8937Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08937.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09314MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09314MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1987-1988
[electronic resource] Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9314NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and are
taken directly from campaign finance reports filed by candidates,
political committees, and others required to file under the federal
election laws. The files are essentially copies of the FEC's on-line
computer files for the 1987-1988 election cycle. The Candidate Master
File (Part 1) contains a record for each registered candidate for
federal office. It includes the candidate's name, address, party
affiliation, incumbent/challenger status, identification number of the
principal campaign committee, office sought, and election year. The
Committee Master File (Part 2) contains a record for each registered
committee for federal office. Information provided includes the
committee's identification number, name, address, treasurer's name,
committee designation and type, party affiliation, report filing
frequency, special interest group category and connected organization's
name, and multicandidate committee status. The Detailed Report File
(Part 3) contains one record for each separate reporting period for
each FEC committee and, as such, is the source for longitudinal
information about committee financial activity during the 1987-1988
election cycle. Information presented in the file includes the
political committee identification number, the report year and type,
the time period covered by the report, total receipts and
disbursements, beginning and end cash balances, debts owed by and to
the committee, individual, political, and candidate contributions,
transfers from affiliated committees, loans received and payments made,
and refunds. The Itemized PAC Contribution File (Part 4) contains one
record for each type of contributor for each reporting period.
Information included in this file covers the type and year of the
report, the time period covered by the report, total contributions, net
contributions, total contribution refunds, net operating expenditures,
cash on hand, debts and obligations owed by the committee, debts and
obligations owed to the committee, contributions from individuals and
loans made, or guaranteed by the candidate.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09314.v2
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9314Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09314.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09315MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09315MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1987-1988
[electronic resource] Reports on Financial Activity (RFA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9315NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are produced in conjunction with Federal Election
Commission (FEC) Reports On Financial Activity (RFA) and are taken
directly from campaign finance reports filed by political committees
and others required to file under the federal election laws. The data
present summary information concerning filers' gross receipts,
disbursements, debts, cash on hand, etc. They also include information
on particular party and non-party committee support of individual
candidates. The data for United States congressional campaigns supply
summarized information about the campaign, including the candidate's
name, incumbency status, party affiliation, receipts, disbursements,
contributions from the candidate, loans, debts, aggregate contributions
by amount and source, and independent expenditures for and against the
candidate. The party and non-party political committee data contain
summary information for committees including the committee name,
special-interest group classification, receipts, cash and in-kind
contributions made and received, disbursements, debts, and total
expenditures for and against House and Senate candidates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09315.v2
campaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrcandidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9315Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09315.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03592MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03592MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1989-1990
[electronic resource]Detailed Report File
Federal Election Commission
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3592NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) and are taken directly from campaign finance reports
filed by candidates, political committees, and others required to file
under the federal election laws. This data file contains one record for
each separate reporting period for each FEC committee and, as such, is
the source for longitudinal information about committee financial
activity during the 1989-1990 election cycle. Information presented in
the file includes the political committee identification number, report
year and type, time period covered by the report, total receipts and
disbursements, beginning and ending cash balances, debts owed by and to
the committee, individual, political, and candidate contributions,
transfers from affiliated committees, loans received and payments made,
and refunds.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03592.v1
campaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsDATAPASS I. NDIIPPFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3592Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03592.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09775MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09775MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1989-1990
[electronic resource] Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9775NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and are
taken directly from campaign finance reports filed by candidates,
political committees, and others required to file under the federal
election laws. The files are essentially copies of the FEC's on-line
computer files for the 1989-1990 election cycle. The Candidate Master
Data file (Part 1) contains a record for each registered candidate for
federal office. It includes the candidate's name, address, party
affiliation, incumbent/challenger status, identification number of the
principal campaign committee, office sought, and election year. The
Committee Master Data file (Part 2) contains a record for each
registered committee for federal office. Information provided includes
the committee's identification number, name, address, treasurer's name,
committee designation and type, party affiliation, report filing
frequency, special interest group category and connected organization's
name, and multicandidate committee status. The Itemized Individual
Contribution File (Part 3) contains a record for each candidate and his
or her committee, other political committees, and persons making
independent expenditures. Itemized receipt and disbursement information
presented in the file includes the filer identification number,
amendment and primary-general indicators, report and transaction types,
address, occupation, transaction date, and transaction amount. The
Itemized PAC Contribution File (Part 4) contains one record for each
type of contributor for each reporting period. Information included in
this file covers the type and year of the report, the time period
covered by the report, total contributions, net contributions, total
contribution refunds, net operating expenditures, cash on hand, debts
and obligations owed by and to the committee, contributions from
individuals, and loans made or guaranteed by the candidate. The
Detailed Report File (Part 5) contains one record for each separate
reporting period for each FEC committee and, as such, is the source for
longitudinal information about committee financial activity during the
1989-1990 election cycle. Information presented in the file includes
the political committee identification number, the report year and
type, the time period covered by the report, total receipts and
disbursements, beginning and ending cash balances, debts owed by and to
the committee, individual, political, and candidate contributions,
transfers from affiliated committees, loans received and payments made,
and refunds.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09775.v2
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9775Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09775.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09828MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09828MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1989-1990
[electronic resource] Reports on Financial Activity (RFA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9828NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data offer information on the campaigns of all
individuals who registered under the Federal Election Campaign Act as
1989 or 1990 candidates for the United States Senate or House of
Representatives. Also included are some individuals who were certified
by the appropriate state authorities as official Senate or House
candidates in a 1989 or 1990 primary, runoff, or general election but
who had not registered with the Federal Election Commission.
Information is provided on the filer's gross receipts, disbursements,
debts, and cash on hand. Information on particular party and non-party
committee support of candidates is included as well. The congressional
campaign data contain variables on candidate's name, incumbency status,
party affiliation, receipts, disbursements, contributions from the
candidate, loans, debts, aggregate contributions by amount and source,
and independent expenditures for and against the candidate. The party
and nonparty political committee data contain summary information for
committees including the committee name, special interest group
classification, receipts, cash and in-kind contributions, and total
expenditures for or against House and Senate candidates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09828.v1
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9828Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09828.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06334MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1995 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06334MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1991-1992
[electronic resource] Detailed Report File
Federal Election Commission
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1995ICPSR6334NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) and are taken directly from campaign finance reports
filed by candidates, political committees, and others required to file
under the federal election laws. This data file contains one record
for each separate reporting period for each FEC committee and, as
such, is the source for longitudinal information about committee
financial activity during the 1991-1992 election cycle. Information
presented in the file includes the political committee identification
number, report year and type, time period covered by the report, total
receipts and disbursements, beginning and ending cash balances, debts
owed by and to the committee, individual, political, and candidate
contributions, transfers from affiliated committees, loans received
and payments made, refunds, and whether the record reports the
activity of a Joint Fundraising Committee.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06334.v2
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6334Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06334.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06337MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1995 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06337MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1991-1992
[electronic resource] Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1995ICPSR6337NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and are
taken directly from campaign finance reports filed by candidates,
political committees, and others required to file under the federal
election laws for the 1991-1992 election cycle. The Candidate Master
Data file (Part 1) contains a record for each registered candidate for
federal office. It includes the candidate's name, address, party
affiliation, incumbent/challenger status, identification number of the
principal campaign committee, office sought, and election year. The
Committee Master Data file (Part 2) contains a record for each
registered committee for federal office. Information provided includes
the committee's identification number, name, address, treasurer's name,
committee designation and type, party affiliation, report filing
frequency, special interest group category and connected organization's
name, and multicandidate committee status. The Itemized PAC
Contribution File (Part 3) contains one record for each type of
contributor for each reporting period. Information included in this
file covers the type and year of the report, the time period covered by
the report, total contributions, net contributions, total contribution
refunds, net operating expenditures, cash on hand, debts and
obligations owed by and to the committee, contributions from
individuals, and loans made or guaranteed by the candidate. The
Itemized Individual Candidate Contribution File (Part 4) contains one
record for each individual contributor during the 1991-1992 reporting
period. Information provided covers the transaction type, amount, and
date as well as contributor name, address, and occupation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06337.v1
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6337Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06337.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06336MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1995 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06336MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1991-1992
[electronic resource] Reports on Financial Activity (RFA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1995ICPSR6336NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data offer information on the campaigns of all
individuals who registered under the Federal Election Campaign Act as
candidates in the 1991 or 1992 elections for the United States Senate
or House of Representatives. Also included are some individuals who
were certified by the appropriate state authorities as official Senate
or House candidates in a 1991 or 1992 primary, runoff, or general
election but who had not registered with the Federal Election
Commission. Information is provided on the filer's gross receipts,
disbursements, debts, and cash on hand. Information on particular party
and nonparty committee support of candidates is included as well. The
congressional campaign data contain variables on candidate's name,
incumbency status, party affiliation, receipts, disbursements,
contributions from the candidate, loans, debts, aggregate contributions
by amount and source, and independent expenditures for and against the
candidate. The party and nonparty political committee data contain
summary information for committees including the committee name,
special interest group classification, receipts, cash and in-kind
contributions, and total expenditures for or against House and Senate
candidates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06336.v1
United States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrcandidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6336Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06336.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03586MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03586MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1993-1994
[electronic resource]Detailed Report File
Federal Election Commission
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3586NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) and are taken directly from campaign finance reports
filed by candidates, political committees, and others required to file
under the federal election laws. This data file contains one record
for each separate reporting period for each FEC committee and, as
such, is the source for longitudinal information about committee
financial activity during the 1993-1994 election cycle. Information
presented in the file includes the political committee identification
number, report year and type, time period covered by the report, total
receipts and disbursements, beginning and ending cash balances, debts
owed by and to the committee, individual, political, and candidate
contributions, transfers from affiliated committees, loans received
and payments made, refunds, and whether the record reports the
activity of a Joint Fundraising Committee.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03586.v1
United States Senateicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrDATAPASS I. NDIIPPICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3586Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03586.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06658MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06658MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1993-1994
[electronic resource] Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6658NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, comprising four separate files, are made
available by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) through the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) and are taken directly from campaign finance
reports filed by candidates, political committees, and others required
to file under the federal election laws for the 1993-1994 election
cycle. Part 1, Candidate Master Data, contains a record for every
registered candidate for federal office. Each of these records
includes the candidate's name, identification number, address, party
affiliation, incumbent/challenger status, and the identification
number of the candidate's principal campaign committee. Part 2,
Committee Master Data, includes a record for every registered
political committee, unauthorized delegate filer, independent
expenditure filer, and communication cost filer. Included in this file
is the identification number, name, address, treasurer's name, party
affiliation, report filing frequency, and special interest group
category of each of these entities. Part 3, Itemized Record of
Contributions to/Disbursements on Behalf of Candidates, comprises
records of reported contributions to candidates and disbursements on
behalf of candidates by political committees, unauthorized delegate
filers, independent expenditure filers, and communication cost filers.
Information in this file includes the identification number of the
contributing/disbursing entity, type of report, and the date, type,
and amount of each transaction. Part 4, Itemized Record of
Individual/Candidate Contributions, furnishes records of receipts of
contributions from individuals, from candidates to their own
campaigns, and disbursements to refund contributions to individuals,
as reported by candidates and their committees, other political
committees, and persons making independent expenditures. Part 4 also
covers the tracking of contributions that individuals earmarked for a
specific candidate as they proceeded through intermediaries registered
with the FEC. Information in this file includes the identification
number of the filer, report type, transaction type, date and amount of
the transaction, and the name, address, and occupation of the
contributor.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06658.v1
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6658Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06658.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06946MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06946MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1993-1994
[electronic resource] Reports on Financial Activity (RFA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6946NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data offer information on the campaigns of all
individuals who registered under the Federal Election Campaign Act as
candidates in the 1993 or 1994 elections for the United States Senate
or House of Representatives. Also included are some individuals who
were certified by the appropriate state authorities as official Senate
or House candidates in a 1993 or 1994 primary, runoff, or general
election but who had not registered with the Federal Election
Commission. Information is provided on the filer's gross receipts,
disbursements, debts, and cash on hand. Information on particular
party and nonparty committee support of candidates is included as
well. The congressional campaign data contain variables on candidate's
name, incumbency status, party affiliation, receipts, disbursements,
contributions from the candidate, loans, debts, aggregate
contributions by amount and source, and independent expenditures for
and against the candidate. The party and nonparty political committee
data contain summary information for committees including the
committee name, special interest group classification, receipts, cash
and in-kind contributions, and total expenditures for or against House
and Senate candidates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06946.v1
candidatesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6946Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06946.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03587MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03587MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1995-1996
[electronic resource] Detailed Report File
Federal Election Commission
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3587NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) and are taken directly from campaign finance reports
filed by candidates, political committees, and others required to file
under the federal election laws. This data file contains one record
for each separate reporting period for each FEC committee and, as
such, is the source for longitudinal information about committee
financial activity during the 1995-1996 election cycle. Information
presented in the file includes the political committee identification
number, report year and type, time period covered by the report, total
receipts and disbursements, beginning and ending cash balances, debts
owed by and to the committee, individual, political, and candidate
contributions, transfers from affiliated committees, loans received
and payments made, refunds, and whether the record reports the
activity of a Joint Fundraising Committee.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03587.v1
campaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3587Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03587.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04129MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04129MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1995-1996
[electronic resource]Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4129NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, comprising five separate files, are made
available by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) through the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) and are taken directly from campaign finance
reports filed by candidates, political committees, and others required
to file under the federal election laws for the 1995-1996 election
cycle. Part 1, Candidate Master File, contains a record for every
registered candidate for federal office. Each of these records
includes the candidate's name, identification number, address, party
affiliation, incumbent/challenger status, and the identification
number of the candidate's principal campaign committee. Part 2,
Committee Master File, includes a record for every registered
political committee, unauthorized delegate filer, independent
expenditure filer, and communication cost filer. Included in this file
is the identification number, name, address, treasurer's name, party
affiliation, report filing frequency, and special interest group
category of each of these entities. Part 3, Itemized Record of
Contributions to/Disbursements on Behalf of Candidates, comprises
records of reported contributions to candidates and disbursements on
behalf of candidates by political committees, unauthorized delegate
filers, independent expenditure filers, and communication cost filers.
Information in this file includes the identification number of the
contributing/disbursing entity, type of report, and the date, type,
and amount of each transaction. Part 4, Itemized Record of
Individual/Candidate Contributions, furnishes records of receipts of
contributions from individuals, from candidates to their own
campaigns, and disbursements to refund contributions to individuals,
as reported by candidates and their committees, other political
committees, and persons making independent expenditures. Part 4 also
covers the tracking of contributions that individuals earmarked for a
specific candidate as they proceeded through intermediaries registered
with the FEC. Information in this file includes the identification
number of the filer, report type, transaction type, date and amount of
the transaction, and the name, address, and occupation of the
contributor. Part 5, Itemized Record of Miscellaneous Transactions,
contains all transactions (contribution, transfers, etc., among
federal committees), all data in the itemized committee contributions
file, plus PAC contributions to party committees, party transfers from
state committee to state committee, and party transfers from national
committee to state committee.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04129.v1
campaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsDATAPASS I. NDIIPPFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4129Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04129.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03588MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03588MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1997-1998
[electronic resource] Detailed Report File
Federal Election Commission
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3588NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) and are taken directly from campaign finance reports
filed by candidates, political committees, and others required to file
under the federal election laws. This data file contains one record
for each separate reporting period for each FEC committee and, as
such, is the source for longitudinal information about committee
financial activity during the 1997-1998 election cycle. Information
presented in the file includes the political committee identification
number, report year and type, time period covered by the report, total
receipts and disbursements, beginning and ending cash balances, debts
owed by and to the committee, individual, political, and candidate
contributions, transfers from affiliated committees, loans received
and payments made, refunds, and whether the record reports the
activity of a Joint Fundraising Committee.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03588.v1
political partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States Senateicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3588Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03588.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03589MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03589MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1999-2000
[electronic resource]Detailed Report File
Federal Election Commission
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3589NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) and are taken directly from campaign finance reports
filed by candidates, political committees, and others required to file
under the federal election laws. This data file contains one record for
each separate reporting period for each FEC committee and, as such, is
the source for longitudinal information about committee financial
activity during the 1999-2000 election cycle. Information presented in
the file includes the political committee identification number, report
year and type, time period covered by the report, total receipts and
disbursements, beginning and ending cash balances, debts owed by and to
the committee, individual, political, and candidate contributions,
transfers from affiliated committees, loans received and payments made,
and refunds.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03589.v1
campaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrDATAPASS I. NDIIPPICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3589Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03589.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04130MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04130MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 1999-2000
[electronic resource]Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Data
Federal Election Commission
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4130NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, comprising five separate files, are made
available by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) through the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) and are taken directly from campaign finance
reports filed by candidates, political committees, and others required
to file under the federal election laws for the 1999-2000 election
cycle. Part 1, Candidate Master File, contains a record for every
registered candidate for federal office. Each of these records
includes the candidate's name, identification number, address, party
affiliation, incumbent/challenger status, and the identification
number of the candidate's principal campaign committee. Part 2,
Committee Master File, includes a record for every registered
political committee, unauthorized delegate filer, independent
expenditure filer, and communication cost filer. Included in this file
is the identification number, name, address, treasurer's name, party
affiliation, report filing frequency, and special interest group
category of each of these entities. Part 3, Itemized Record of
Contributions to/Disbursements on Behalf of Candidates, comprises
records of reported contributions to candidates and disbursements on
behalf of candidates by political committees, unauthorized delegate
filers, independent expenditure filers, and communication cost filers.
Information in this file includes the identification number of the
contributing/disbursing entity, type of report, and the date, type,
and amount of each transaction. Part 4, Itemized Record of
Individual/Candidate Contributions, furnishes records of receipts of
contributions from individuals, from candidates to their own
campaigns, and disbursements to refund contributions to individuals,
as reported by candidates and their committees, other political
committees, and persons making independent expenditures. Part 4 also
covers the tracking of contributions that individuals earmarked for a
specific candidate as they proceeded through intermediaries registered
with the FEC. Information in this file includes the identification
number of the filer, report type, transaction type, date and amount of
the transaction, and the name, address, and occupation of the
contributor. Part 5, Itemized Record of Miscellaneous Transactions,
contains all transactions (contribution, transfers, etc., among federal
committees), all data in the itemized committee contributions file,
plus PAC contributions to party committees, party transfers from state
committee to state committee, and party transfers from national
committee to state committee.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04130.v1
campaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsDATAPASS I. NDIIPPFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4130Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04130.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03590MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03590MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Expenditures in the United States, 2001-2002
[electronic resource]Detailed Report File
Federal Election Commission
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3590NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are made available by the Federal Election
Commission (FEC) and are taken directly from campaign finance reports
filed by candidates, political committees, and others required to file
under the federal election laws. This data file contains one record
for each separate reporting period for each FEC committee and, as
such, is the source for longitudinal information about committee
financial activity during the 2001-2002 election cycle. Information
presented in the file includes the political committee identification
number, report year and type, time period covered by the report, total
receipts and disbursements, beginning and ending cash balances, debts
owed by and to the committee, individual, political, and candidate
contributions, transfers from affiliated committees, loans received
and payments made, refunds, and whether the record reports the
activity of a Joint Fundraising Committee.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03590.v1
campaign contributionsicpsrcampaign expendituresicpsrcampaign finance lawicpsrcampaign fundsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional elections (US House)icpsrcongressional elections (US Senate)icpsrlegislatorsicpsrpolitical elitesicpsrpolitical organizationsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrUnited States House of RepresentativesicpsrUnited States SenateicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsDATAPASS I. NDIIPPFederal Election CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3590Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03590.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00039MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00039MiAaIMiAaI
Canadian Census and Election Data, 1908-1968
[electronic resource]
Donald E. Blake
2011-08-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR39NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains seven files of Canadian
census and election data, each corresponding to a particular
electoral period when the number of constituencies was fixed.
The data files include returns from the federal elections of
1908 and 1911 and data from the 1911 Census (Part 1), the
elections of 1917 and 1921 and the 1921 Census (Part 2), the
elections of 1925, 1926, and 1930 (Part 3), the elections of
1935, 1940, and 1945 (Part 4), the election of 1949 and the
1951 Census (Part 5), the elections of 1957, 1958, 1962, 1963,
and 1965 and the 1961 Census (Part 6), and the election of
1968 (Part 7). The election data include information on the
total valid vote cast and the percentage of the total vote
received by each of the major parties, including the Conservative,
Liberal, Socialist, Labor, Independent, Progressive, CCF, Social
Credit, NDP, and Creditiste parties, as well as a total for all
other parties. The census data provide demographic information on
religion, including Anglican, Baptist, Jewish, Lutheran,
Presbyterian, Roman Catholic, United Church, and other
denominational sects, and ethnic origin, including British,
French, German, Italian, Scandinavian, Russian, Polish, Asiatic,
Native, and others, as well as information on age, education,
occupation, and income from the 1961 Census.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00039.v2
census dataicpsrelection returnsicpsrelectionsicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrvotersicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A.4.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Merged Electoral and Ecological Data, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC VI. Human Dimension of International RelationsIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorBlake, Donald E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)39Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00039.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06571MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1995 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06571MiAaIMiAaI
Canadian Election Study, 1993
[electronic resource] Incorporating the 1992 Referendum Survey on the Charlottetown Accord
Richard Johnston
,
Andre Blais
,
Henry Brady
,
Elisabeth Gidengil
,
Neil Nevitte
1995-10-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1995ICPSR6571NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data were collected to assess the importance of
campaign dynamics and the impact of events in the understanding of
election results. The study consists of five related surveys grouped
around two main survey components: the referendum surveys and the
election surveys. Respondents participated in at least two surveys, but
not in all five. The election surveys were completed just prior to and
after the October 25, 1993, Canadian election, and consist of campaign
period, post-election, and mail-back components. The referendum surveys
were completed just prior to and after the October 26, 1992, referendum
on the Charlottetown Accord. The Charlottetown Accord contained various
proposals, including the separation of Quebec from Canada as a
sovereignty, the guarantee of one-quarter of the seats in the House of
Commons to Quebec, and recognition of the right of Canada's aboriginal
peoples to govern themselves. The major areas of investigation across
all surveys were political and social awareness, attitudes, voting
intentions, and behavior centered around major issues of
representation, job and employment, government spending, taxes, social
programs, crime and punishment, and continentalism. Variables assessed
public interest in the referendum by asking respondents about the
perceived effect of the referendum on their living standards, their
vote intentions, predictions of the outcome of the vote, reactions to
the results of the vote, knowledge about and opinions of specific
provisions of the Accord, and awareness of the stand taken by political
leaders, groups, and organizations regarding the Accord. Other
variables probed respondents' opinions of the parties and leaders, Kim
Campbell's performance in her cabinet job before she became Prime
Minister, women and racial minorities, party preference, ideological
leanings, vote history, and position on several policy issues.
Additional items address general attitudes toward the deficit and
higher taxes, abortion, Senate reform, aboriginal people, Canadian
unity and Quebec sovereignty, feminists, homosexuals, immigrants, the
business community, the media, unions, God, democracy, unemployment,
inflation, and pensions. Demographic data collected on respondents
include age, marital status, level of education, employment status,
income level, religious affiliation, union affiliation, citizenship,
ethnicity, language, and gender.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06571.v1
economic conditionsicpsrelectionsicpsrminoritiesicpsrnational electionsicpsrnational unityicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrself governmenticpsrseparatismicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrvoting historyicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataJohnston, RichardBlais, AndreBrady, HenryGidengil, ElisabethNevitte, NeilInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6571Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06571.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07009MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07009MiAaIMiAaI
Canadian Federal Election Study, 1968
[electronic resource]
John Meisel
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7009NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study probed the views of the Canadian electorate
following the June 1968 federal election. Respondents provided basic
background information and also responded to questions about their
reactions to the election outcome, their evaluations of the parties
and candidates, regional conflicts within Canada, and a wide variety
of issues that were salient during the campaign.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07009.v1
economic conditionsicpsrelectionsicpsrnational electionsicpsrparty membershipicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical leadersicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpublic opinionicpsrTrudeau, Pierreicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvotersicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataMeisel, JohnInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7009Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07009.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07225MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07225MiAaIMiAaI
Canadian National Election Study, 1965
[electronic resource]
Philip Converse
,
John Meisel
,
Maurice Pinard
,
Peter Regenstreif
,
Mildred Schwartz
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7225NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study consisted of a survey administered to eligible
Canadian voters after the 1965 national elections. Open-ended
questions measured the respondents' attitudes toward the problems
confronting Canada and various campaign issues, as well as their
political efficacy and trust in government. Provincial and regional
conflicts and affinities were explored through several questions
inquiring which provinces were more powerful, better off, and worse
off. The respondents were also queried about their political party
attachments, voting behavior, campaign activities, and attitudes
toward campaign financing. Demographic data include age, sex, marital
status, education, religion, occupation, and country of birth, if
applicable.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07225.v1
campaign issuesicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical efficacyicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrtrust in governmenticpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataConverse, PhilipMeisel, JohnPinard, MauriceRegenstreif, PeterSchwartz, MildredInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7225Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07225.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07410MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07410MiAaIMiAaI
Canadian National Election Study, 1972
[electronic resource]
Market Opinion Research (Canada) Ltd.
2006-01-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7410NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study includes three separate surveys that focused on
the 1972 national election in Canada. Two surveys were conducted prior
to the October 31 election date, and the third immediately following
the election. The first questionnaire (Part 1), administered in
June-July 1972, elicited respondents' opinions on parties and
personalities in federal politics and on issues such as inflation,
constitutional reform, campaign spending, marijuana legislation, and
the right of federal employees to strike. Respondents were also asked
to assess the performance of the Prime Minister and the qualifications
of the main opposition candidates. Finally, respondents were
questioned about their partisan affiliation and their voting behavior
over the past few elections. Respondents' sex was the only demographic
information collected in this survey. The second survey (Part 2),
conducted in September 1972, assessed respondents' opinions on
political issues such as unemployment, Canadian/United States
relations, environment, taxes, price controls, and certain federal
programs. In addition, respondents were questioned about their
candidate preference, partisan identification, and party preference
for the upcoming election. Basic demographic data such as age group,
level of education, occupation, religious preference, union
membership, national origin, and family income were also included. The
third survey (Part 3) was administered in early November to a sample
that included both first-time respondents and a panel that had also
been interviewed in September. Respondents were asked to evaluate the
federal election campaign, the candidates, parties, and political
issues. Voting behavior in both the federal and local elections was
also assessed. Filter variables are provided in Parts 1 and 3 to
identify questions present on different survey forms, and in Part 3
filter variables distinguish between respondents who voted, or did not
vote in the 1972 election. Demographic information included age
group, level of education, occupation, religious preference, union
membership, national origin, and family income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07410.v2
campaign expendituresicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical leadersicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrprice controlsicpsrtaxesicpsrunemploymenticpsrvoting behavioricpsrcandidatesicpsrconstitutional changeicpsrelectionsicpsrenvironmental attitudesicpsrinflationicpsrlabor strikesicpsrmarijuanaicpsrnational electionsicpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesMarket Opinion Research (Canada) Ltd.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7410Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07410.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08544MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1986 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08544MiAaIMiAaI
Canadian National Election Study, 1984
[electronic resource]
Ronald D. Lambert
,
Steven D. Brown
,
James E. Curtis
,
Barry J. Kay
,
John M. Wilson
1992-02-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1986ICPSR8544NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
Topics covered in this survey include the respondent's
interest in politics in general and in the 1984 Federal Election in
particular, political trust, respondent assessment of the most
important issues in the 1984 election, party identification at both the
federal and provincial level, exposure to the campaign including the
television debates, respondent's vote and reasons for that decision,
attitudes towards the parties and their leaders, feeling thermometer
ratings of party leaders and various groups, attitudes toward social
class, and various other social and political attitudes. Background
information such as education, occupation, religion, language, and
group memberships was also obtained from respondents. In addition, the
interview data were augmented with information about the
socio-demographic and political characteristics of the consituency in
which each respondent resided.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08544.v1
electionsicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesLambert, Ronald D.Brown, Steven D.Curtis, James E.Kay, Barry J.Wilson, John M.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8544Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08544.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09386MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09386MiAaIMiAaI
Canadian National Election Study, 1988
[electronic resource]
Richard, et al. Johnston
1992-03-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9386NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection, containing information on the voting
behavior and political attitudes of Canadians, consists of three waves
of data gathered before and after the 1988 Canadian national election.
The first wave, conducted by telephone in October and November 1988
before the November 21st election, focused on respondents' interest in
the election, perceptions of the media, voting intentions, attitudes
toward policy and campaign issues, assessments of government
performance, and ratings of leaders, parties, and candidates. Other
items included respondents' sociodemographic and economic
characteristics, as well as party, candidate, and constituency
identification. The second wave, conducted by telephone after the
election from November 1988 through January 1989, contained some of the
same items covered in the first wave but also included questions on
voting behavior, campaign activities, and groups in Canadian society,
along with a special battery on free trade. The third wave, conducted
by mail from December 1988 through March 1989, explored fiscal
priorities, the economy, policy issues, changes to Canadian society,
political efficacy, societal goals, capitalist values, rights and
liberties, and conceptions of community.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09386.v1
campaign issuesicpsrcandidatesicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrelectionsicpsrnational electionsicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrIDRC III. Electoral Systems and Political BehaviorICPSR XIV.A.2.b. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Studies Series, Nations Other Than the United StatesIDRC VII. Public Opinion DataJohnston, Richard, et al.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9386Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09386.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07757MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07757MiAaIMiAaI
Candidate and Constituency Statistics of Elections in the United States, 1788-1990
[electronic resource]
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
1995-06-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7757NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
These data are derived from CANDIDATE NAME AND CONSTITUENCY
TOTALS, 1788-1990 (ICPSR 0002). They consist of returns for two-thirds
of all elections from 1788 to 1823 to the offices of president,
governor, and United States representative, and over 90 percent of all
elections to those offices since 1824. They also include information on
United States Senate elections since 1912. Returns for one additional
statewide office are included beginning with the 1968 election. This
file provides a set of derived measures describing the vote totals for
candidates and the pattern of contest in each constituency. These
measures include the total number of votes cast for all candidates in
the election, each candidate's percentage of the vote received, and
several measures of the relative performance of each candidate. They
are appended to the individual candidate records and permit extensive
analysis of electoral contests over time. This dataset contains returns
for all parties and candidates (as well as scattering vote) for general
elections and special elections, including information on elections for
which returns were available only at the constituency level. Included
in this edition are data from the District of Columbia election for
United States senator and United States representative. The offices of
two senators and one representative were created by the "District of
Columbia Statehood Constitutional Convention Initiative," which was
approved by District voters in 1980. Elections for these offices were
postponed until the 1990 general election. The three offices are
currently local District positions, which will turn into federal
offices if the District becomes a state.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07757.v5
candidatesicpsrelection returnsicpsrelectionsicpsrelective officesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrvote counticpsrICPSR XIV.A.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Returns, United StatesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social ResearchInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7757Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07757.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR00002MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR00002MiAaIMiAaI
Candidate Name and Constituency Totals, 1788-1990
[electronic resource]
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
1995-06-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR2NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides the names of candidates,
political party name and ICPSR party ID code, and the number of votes
received by each candidate in the constituency for elections between
1788 and 1990. The data include county-level returns for over 90
percent of all elections to the offices of president, governor, United
States representative (1824-1990), and United States senator
(1912-1990). The dataset also includes returns for approximately
two-thirds of all elections to the offices of president, governor, and
United States representative for the period 1788-1823. Returns for one
additional statewide office are included beginning with the 1968
elections. Also presented are 1990 data from the District of Columbia
election for United States senator and United States representative.
The offices of two senators and one representative were created by the
"District of Columbia Statehood Constitutional Convention
Initiative," which was approved by District voters in 1980. Elections
for these offices were postponed until the 1990 general election. The
three offices are currently local District positions, which will turn
into federal offices if the District becomes a state.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00002.v5
candidatesicpsrconstituenciesicpsrelectionsicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical behavioricpsrpolitical partiesicpsrICPSR XIV.A.3.a. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Election Returns, United StatesRCMD X. Political ParticipationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social ResearchInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR00002.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04160MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04160MiAaIMiAaI
CBS Monthly News Poll, July 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2005-04-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4160NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their
opinions of the 2004 presidential campaign and the candidates, and the
way George W. Bush was handling certain issues, including the economy,
the war in Iraq, and terrorism. The survey also asked questions about
the Democratic National Convention. In addition, respondents were
asked to evaluate their weight and how often they ate at fast food
restaurants. Background information on respondents includes voter
registration status, party identification, voting record in the 2000
and 2002 elections, marital status, sex, religious preference,
education record, age, ethnicity, income, and willingness for
callback.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04160.v1
presidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrterrorismicpsrvoting behavioricpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrCheney, Dickicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrEdwards, JohnicpsremploymenticpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, Johnicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4160Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04160.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34613MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34613MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, April #2, 2012
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
60 Minutes
,
Vanity Fair
2013-06-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34613NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, the last of two fielded April 2012, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they thought the country was headed in the right direction, and how likely it was that there would be another terrorist attack on the United States within the next few months. Respondents were also queried on their daily driving experiences, whether they were planning on buying a car, how they would rate the condition of the system of roads and bridges in the area where they live, and how safe they feel driving on the local roads and bridges. Opinions were also sought about gasoline prices, the changes in the Republican Party and the Democratic Party over recent decades, and gun control laws. A variety of additional topics were mentioned including upcoming holidays and the Buffett rule. Finally, respondents were asked whether they voted in the 2008 presidential election and who they voted for, whether they supported the Tea Party movement, whether they were registered to vote, and whether they owned a firearm. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, social class, marital status, household makeup, education level, household income, employment status, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, and whether respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34613.v1
air travelicpsrauthorityicpsrautomobile useicpsrautomobilesicpsrcellular phonesicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrdriving habitsicpsrgasoline pricesicpsrgun control legislationicpsrgun ownershipicpsrholidaysicpsrpainicpsrpatriotismicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrTea Party movementicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist threaticpsrtransport infrastructureicpsrvotersicpsrvoting behavioricpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political MattersICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS News60 MinutesVanity FairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34613Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34613.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34465MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34465MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, December #2, 2011
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
60 Minutes
,
Vanity Fair
2013-01-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34465NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded December of 2011 and the second of two, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked how well Barack Obama was handling the presidency, foreign policy, and the economy. Further questions asked respondents whether the country was moving in the right direction, the most important problem facing the country, the state of the national economy, how the government was working, and whether Congress was performing their job well. Opinions were sought on illegal immigration, job creation, the budget deficit, Medicare and Social Security, and raising taxes on households making more than one million dollars. Further information was sought about how concerned the respondent was that they or someone in their household would lose their job in the next twelve months, their family's financial outlook, and whether they or a family member were on Medicare, Social Security, or any other type of government benefits. Respondents were queried about how much attention they were paying to the 2012 campaign, whether they planned to vote in a 2012 primary or caucus, whether they watched or listened to the Republican debates, who they preferred for the Republican nomination and how sure they were about this choice, their enthusiasm for the 2012 election, how well they knew the Republican candidates' economic policies, and which issues were most important when choosing the Republican nominee. Opinions were also sought on the candidates for the Republican nomination with special attention on the political philosophies, personalities, beliefs, and values of candidates Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, and Newt Gingrich. Finally, respondents were asked a number of questions pertaining to their social lives and societal attitudes. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, employment status, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status, voting behavior, number of phones, and whether respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34465.v1
Bachmann, Micheleicpsrbudget cutsicpsrcampaign issuesicpsreconomic conditionsicpsreconomic policyicpsreconomic recoveryicpsrforeign policyicpsrGingrich, Newticpsrgovernment programsicpsrHuntsman, Jonicpsrillegal immigrantsicpsrjob performanceicpsrjob securityicpsrMedicareicpsrnational debticpsrnational economyicpsrnational politicsicpsrObama Administration (2009- )icpsrObama, BarackicpsrPaul, RonicpsrPerry, Rickicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical attitudesicpsrpolitical awarenessicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical leadersicpsrpolitical oppositionicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential campaignsicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential debatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrrecessionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrRomney, MitticpsrSantorum, Rickicpsrsocial issuesicpsrSocial Securityicpsrtax cutsicpsrtax increasesicpsrtax policyicpsrtax reformicpsrTea Party movementicpsrunemploymenticpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesICPSR XIV.B.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Political Participation, United StatesCBS News60 MinutesVanity FairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34465Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34465.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34591MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34591MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, January #3, 2012
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
60 Minutes
,
Vanity Fair
2013-05-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34591NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, the last of three fielded January 2012, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues.
Opinions were collected on federal income taxes, the federal tax policy on capital gains, and whether respondents felt things in the United States were going in the right direction.
Respondents were also queried on topics such as firearms, hedge funds, online piracy, and past presidents.
Additional topics include respondents' television preferences, the Academy Awards, the Super Bowl, and Valentine's Day.
Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, military service, and whether respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34591.v1
military serviceicpsrObama, Michelleicpsronline piracyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrtax policyicpsrtax ratesicpsrtax reformicpsrtaxesicpsrtelevisionicpsrcapital gainsicpsrchildrenicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrelectionsicpsrfinancial managementicpsrfirearmsicpsrholidaysicpsrLincoln, Abrahamicpsrtelevision viewingicpsrvotersicpsrvoting behavioricpsrwaricpsrWashington, GeorgeicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesICPSR XIV.C. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political MattersCBS News60 MinutesVanity FairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34591Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34591.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34995MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34995MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, March #1, 2013
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
60 Minutes
,
Vanity Fair
2014-04-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34995NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, the first of three fielded March 2013, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked multiple questions on the budget sequester, including whether it would affect them personally, who should be blamed for it, whether it would have a good impact on the country, and opinions on how to best handle it. Respondents were also asked how closely they followed the news about spending cuts and tax increases, and whether President Barack Obama, Democrats in Congress, and Republicans in Congress should have compromised their positions in order to reach an agreement. Opinions were collected on the war in Iraq, including whether taking military action against Iraq was the correct decision, and whether the United States succeeded in accomplishing its objectives in Iraq. Additional information collected includes 2012 presidential voting behavior, opinions on daylight saving time, sports, the SAT tests, popular movies and celebrity figures, and various hypothetical college scenarios. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, and whether respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34995.v1
Iraq WaricpsrObama, Barackicpsrparental attitudesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrtax increasesicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoting behavioricpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrbudget cutsicpsrcollege activitiesicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesICPSR XIV.C. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political MattersCBS News60 MinutesVanity FairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34995Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34995.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34635MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34635MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/60 Minutes/Vanity Fair National Poll, September #2, 2012
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
60 Minutes
,
Vanity Fair
2013-07-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34635NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, the last of two fielded in September 2012, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked about the job approval of past presidents such as Franklin D. Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. Opinions were also collected on issues such as the Electoral College, lobbying rights, legalization of marijuana, and Islam. Respondents were queried on whether they voted in the 2008 presidential election and who they voted for, as well as when they last participated in an election of any kind. Additional topics include the upcoming Halloween holiday and various superstitions. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, employment status, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, whether respondents were registered to vote, and whether respondents thought of themselves as born-again Christians.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34635.v1
presidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrBush, George W.icpsrClinton, BillicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrEisenhower, DwighticpsrElectoral CollegeicpsremploymenticpsrholidaysicpsrIslamicpsrmarijuanaicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential campaignsicpsrpresidential debatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrReagan, RonaldicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrRoosevelt, Franklin D.icpsrTea Party movementicpsrvoter registrationicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesICPSR XIV.C. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political MattersCBS News60 MinutesVanity FairInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34635Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34635.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04158MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04158MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Callback Poll for CBS News/New York Times June 2004 Monthly Poll, July 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
The New York Times
2005-02-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4158NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This callback poll for CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES MONTHLY
POLL, JUNE 2004 (ICPSR 4097) is part of a continuing series of monthly
surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range
of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give
their opinions of the 2004 presidential campaign and the candidates
and the way George W. Bush was handling certain issues, such as the
economy, the war in Iraq, and terrorism. Respondents were also asked
their opinions of George W. Bush, John Kerry, and vice-presidential
candidates Dick Cheney and John Edwards, and which candidate they were
likely to vote for. The survey also asked questions about organic
foods and personal military service. Background information on
respondents includes voter registration status, party identification,
voting record in the 2000 election, marital status, sex, religious
preference, education record, age, ethnicity, and income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04158.v1
vice-presidential candidatesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrCheney, DickicpsrClinton Administration (1993-2001)icpsreconomic conditionsicpsrEdwards, JohnicpsremploymenticpsrHussein, SaddamicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, Johnicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrNader, Ralphicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrterrorismicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesTPDRC I. TerrorismCBS NewsThe New York TimesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4158Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04158.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04092MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04092MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Callback Poll for March 2004 Poll, April 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4092NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their
opinions of the 2004 presidential campaign and the candidates, the way
George W. Bush was handling certain issues, the economy, the war in
Iraq, terrorism, and the September 11th Commission hearings.
Respondents were also asked to give their opinions of supermarket
loyalty cards or customer reward cards, whether there ever had been
life on Mars, and the stories in the news about Princess Diana's car
crash. Background information on respondents includes voter
registration status, party identification, voting record in the 2000
election, marital status, sex, religious preference, education record,
age, ethnicity, income, and reachable call-back phone numbers.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04092.v1
terrorismicpsrvoting behavioricpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsreconomic conditionsicpsrHussein, Saddamicpsrintelligence agenciesicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, Johnicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRice, CondoleezzaicpsrSeptember 11 attackicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4092Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04092.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04012MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04012MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Call Back Poll, January 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2006-12-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4012NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded January 20, 2004, queried respondents
from the CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES MONTHLY POLL, JANUARY 2004 (ICPSR
4011). Numerous questions were replications from the original poll.
Additional questions asked respondents whether they had watched or
listened to President George W. Bush's State of the Union address
that evening, whether they approved of his proposals, whether the
government could afford the proposals mentioned, whether the
temporary tax cuts enacted in 2001 should be made permanent, and the
effect of these tax cuts on the economy. Other topics addressed the
2004 presidential election and President Bush's handling of the
presidency, foreign affairs, and the economy. Background variables
include sex, age, ethnicity, marital status, household income,
education, number of telephone lines in household, religion,
religiosity, political affiliation, political orientation, and voter
participation and registration history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04012.v1
Bush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrCheney, DickicpsrClark, WesleyicpsrDean, HowardicpsrEdwards, JohnicpsrGephardt, DickicpsrimmigrationicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, JohnicpsrKucinich, DennisicpsrLieberman, JoeicpsrMoseley-Braun, Carolicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrSharpton, Alicpsrspace explorationicpsrState of the Union AddressicpsrtaxesicpsrterrorismicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)CBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4012Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04012.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03122MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03122MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Call-Back Poll, July 2000
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2009-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3122NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. This survey, fielded July 27, 2000, is a
call-back of the July 20-23, 2000, cohort (CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES
MONTHLY POLL #2, JULY 2000 [ICPSR 3121]), and was conducted to assess
respondents' interest in and opinions about the 2000 presidential
election, interest in the Republican and Democratic party conventions,
readiness to vote in the upcoming election, and level of support for
both candidates, Vice President Al Gore and Texas governor George
W. Bush. Respondents were asked to give their opinions of President
Bill Clinton and his handling of the presidency, foreign policy, and
the economy, as well as their views on the way Congress was handling
its job. They were also asked whether on the day of the survey they
would vote for Al Gore or George W. Bush. Those polled answered the
same question once more, this time choosing among four candidates: Al
Gore (Democratic Party candidate), George W. Bush (Republican Party
candidate), Pat Buchanan (Reform Party candidate), and Ralph Nader
(Green Party candidate). A set of questions regarding Dick Cheney, the
Republican Party vice presidential candidate, was posed, including
whether respondents were glad that George W. Bush named Cheney as his
running mate, whether Cheney's personality influenced their decision
on taking part in the election, and whether Cheney had the experience
necessary to be a good vice president. Those polled expressed their
opinions about Bill Clinton, Al Gore, George W. Bush, Ralph Nader, Pat
Buchanan, and Dick Cheney, as well as about their respective
parties. Information was elicited on respondents' participation and
candidate selection in the 1996 presidential election and in the 1998
House of Representatives election. In addition, respondents answered a
set of questions comparing Al Gore and George W. Bush as presidential
candidates with respect to their qualities of leadership, their
understanding of the complex problems a president has to deal with
(especially international), if they could be trusted to keep their
word as president, if they shared the same moral values as most
Americans, if they said what they believed or what people wanted to
hear, and if they cared about people like the respondent. Other
questions examined respondents' opinions about both candidates' views
on the following subjects: the economy, abortion, taxes, the
environment, and health care. Those polled also expressed their views
about whether the Democratic Party or the Republican Party was more
likely to ensure a strong economy, make sure that the tax system was
fair, make sure United States military defenses were strong, make the
right decisions about Social Security, improve the education and
health care systems, protect the environment, and uphold traditional
family values, and which party cared more about people like the
respondent. The survey also questioned respondents on other issues,
such as the most important problems for the government in the coming
year and abortion. Background information on respondents includes age,
gender, race/ethnic identity, education, religion, voter registration
and participation history, political party affiliation, political
orientation, marital status, age of children in the household, and
income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03122.v3
abortionicpsrhealth careicpsrNader, Ralphicpsrnational defenseicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrBuchanan, Paticpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial issuesicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrSocial SecurityicpsrBush, George W.icpsrCheney, DickicpsrClinton, Billicpsreducationicpsrenvironmental issuesicpsrforeign policyicpsrGore, AlicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3122Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03122.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04488MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04488MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Campaign Fundraising Poll, March 1997
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2008-05-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4488NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded March 9, 1997, is part of a continuing
series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the
presidency and on a range of other political and social issues.
Respondents were asked to give their opinions of President Bill
Clinton and his handling of the presidency. Respondents were asked
whether campaign finance laws needed to be reformed, how closely they
had paid attention to the 1996 Democratic campaign fundraising
activities and whether anything bothered them about it, and whether
Congress or an independent counsel should hold hearings to investigate
the fundraising practices and the White House involvement in them. A
series of questions asked respondents whether they thought Bill
Clinton and Vice President Al Gore had personally done anything wrong
in the campaign fundraising activities, how important an issue the
fundraising situation was to the nation, and whether the fundraising
practices were common practices for both political parties and for the
president and vice president. Views were sought on whether many public
officials, including Bill Clinton, had made policy decisions as a
direct result of the money he received from major campaign
contributors, whether respondents thought Bill Clinton and Republicans
in Congress were serious about wanting to reform campaign financing,
and whether it was fair to compare the campaign fundraising
controversy with Watergate. Additional questions asked whether they
would favor public financing for congressional candidates, which
political party raised more federal election campaign money in 1996,
and whether Al Gore should be nominated as the Democratic Party's
presidential nominee in 2000. Demographic variables include sex, race,
age, household income, education level, political party affiliation,
political philosophy, and voter participation history and registration
status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04488.v1
campaign fundsicpsrClinton, Billicpsrcongressional hearingsicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrGore, Alicpsrgovernmenticpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical corruptionicpsrpolitical ethicsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential campaignsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrvoting behavioricpsrWatergate affairicpsrattitudesicpsrcampaign contributionsicpsrcampaign finance reformicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4488Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04488.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09614MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1992 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09614MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Federal Budget Deficit Poll, October 1990
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2009-07-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1992ICPSR9614NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey focuses on issues related to difficulties
encountered by the federal government in reaching agreement on a
federal budget deficit reduction plan. Respondents indicated their
approval or disapproval of President Bush's handling of both his
presidency and the budget deficit, identified President Bush or
Congress as being more to blame or equally to blame for the
difficulties in dealing with the deficit, and specified whether
Republicans or Democrats in Congress were more at fault or equally at
fault in dealing with the deficit situation. Respondents were queried
regarding their general knowledge of the problem, including how closely
they had followed the difficulties with the budget, their perception of
the difficulties as either a true crisis or a political machination,
and their opinion of the House of Representatives' rejection of the
deficit reduction compromise arrived at by the President and leaders of
Congress. Regarding the House's rejection of the compromise, those
surveyed indicated whether they would vote for their representative
based on his/her vote on the compromise, and if they knew how their
representative had voted. Respondents also reacted to Bush's shutting
down of various government services rather than signing a bill to
extend them another week and indicated whether they had been affected
by the shutdown or if they anticipated being affected. In addition,
respondents revealed their preference for a large across-the-board cut
in all government programs and services or a federal budget deficit
reduction plan, and speculated about whether Congress was likely to
arrive at a plan that would be fair. Those surveyed also indicated
whether they would be willing to comply with a series of measures to
reduce the deficit, including paying an additional $100 to $500 a year
in taxes, raising the charge for Medicare, raising the tax on beer,
wine, liquor, and gasoline, limiting government health and education
services, and raising taxes for people with incomes of over $100,000 a
year. Respondents also evaluated the strength of Bush's leadership in
trying to settle the budget, indicated whether or not they were
registered to vote and if they would vote for the Republican or
Democratic candidate in their district for the House of Representatives
if that election were held today, commented on whether most congressmen
have made decisions based on what is best for the country or what they
think will insure re-election, and characterized the cause of
difficulty in reaching a budget agreement as either disagreement over
important issues or political bickering. Background information on
respondents includes political alignment, employment of a household
member by the federal government, income, education, age, race, sex,
number of adults at home, and state/region of residence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09614.v2
budget cutsicpsrBush Administration (1989-1993)icpsrBush, George H.W.icpsrcongressional candidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsrfederal budget deficiticpsrleadershipicpsrMedicareicpsrparty identificationicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidentialicpsrpublic opinionicpsrreelectionicpsrregistered votersicpsrtax increasesicpsrtax revenuesicpsrUnited States House of Representativesicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR IV.B. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Surveys of Economic Attitudes and BehaviorCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9614Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09614.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09136MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s1989 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09136MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News General Election Exit Poll
[electronic resource]State Files, 1988
CBS News
2008-05-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1989ICPSR9136NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey is part of an ongoing data collection effort by
CBS News. Interviews were conducted with voters in 24 states as they
left their polling places on election day, November 8, 1988.
Respondents were asked a series of questions about their vote choices
in the presidential, senate, and gubernatorial races, the issues and
factors that most influenced those votes, and whether their vote for
president was influenced by Reagan's policies. Questions regarding
the various referenda and propositions on the ballot and other issues
specific to the respondent's state also were asked. Additional items
included respondents' opinions on the condition of the United States
economy, their presidential vote choice in 1984, when they made their
presidential choice in the current election, and the strength of that
choice. Demographic information collected includes sex, race, age,
employment status, religion, education, political party
identification, and family income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09136.v1
Reagan, Ronaldicpsrsenatorial electionsicpsrcandidatesicpsrcongressional electionsicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrelectionsicpsrgubernatorial electionsicpsrpolitical affiliationicpsrpolitical issuesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9136Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09136.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21360MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21360MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #1, January 2007
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2008-09-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21360NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted January 1-3, 2007, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way President George W. Bush was handling the presidency and issues such as the economy and foreign policy. Views were sought on the way things were going in the United States, the newly elected United States Congress, the condition of the national economy, and the Iraq war. Respondents gave their opinions of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and the potential 2008 Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. Other topics addressed the use of herbal supplements, concern over health care costs, the effect of the Iraq war on the respondent's community, and whether respondents were more likely to vote in a Democratic or Republican primary in the 2008 presidential election. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, education level, household income, marital status, religious preference, military service, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status and participation history, and the presence of children and household members between the ages of 18 and 24.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21360.v1
Edwards, Johnicpsrforeign policyicpsrGiuliani, RudolphicpsrGore, Alicpsrhealth care costsicpsrHussein, SaddamicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, JohnicpsrKucinich, DennisicpsrMcCain, Johnicpsrnational economyicpsrnutritionicpsrObama, BarackicpsrPelosi, Nancyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrReid, HarryicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoting behavioricpsrprimariesicpsrattitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21360Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21360.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04161MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04161MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #1, September 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2005-09-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4161NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their
opinions of the 2004 presidential campaign and the candidates,
including how strongly they supported a particular candidate and which
issues they felt the candidates should address. Respondents were also
asked for their opinions on the way George W. Bush was handling
certain issues, such as the economy,the war in Iraq, and terrorism.
The survey also asked questions about Pope John Paul II, his
leadership, and the Catholic Church and its teachings. Background
information on respondents includes voter registration status, party
identification, voting record in the 2000 and 2002 elections, marital
status, sex, religious preference, education record, political
ideology, length of time living at current residence, age, ethnicity,
and income.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04161.v1
bin Laden, OsamaicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrCatholic ChurchicpsrCheney, DickicpsrClinton, Billicpsreconomic conditionsicpsrEdwards, JohnicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, Johnicpsrmilitary serviceicpsrNader, Ralphicpsrnational economyicpsrnational securityicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrPope John Paul IIicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential campaignsicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic approvalicpsrpublic opinionicpsrreligionicpsrterrorismicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4161Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04161.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03918MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03918MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #2, August 2003
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2009-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3918NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted August 26-28, 2003, is part of a
continuing series of monthly polls that solicit opinions on political
and social issues. Views were gathered on the 2004 presidential
election, as well as President George W. Bush and his handling of the
presidency, foreign policy, and the economy. Respondents were asked
about the condition of the economy and whether it was better, worse, or
the same as when George W. Bush first took office, how concerned
respondents were that a member of their household would lose his or her
job in the next year, and the degree of progress made by the Bush
Administration in making the United States safe from terrorism,
improving the economy, reducing taxes, creating new jobs, and improving
the environment. A series of questions addressed whether the war with
Iraq was worth it, if the number of troops in Iraq should be increased,
decreased, or maintained, whether the Bush Administration told the
entire truth, the success of United States efforts to bring order and
stability to Iraq, and whether the United States or the United Nations
should be responsible for Iraq's new government. Additional questions
asked if respondents believed that the threat of terrorism increased,
decreased, or stayed the same as a result of United States military
action against Iraq, how concerned they were about the loss of civil
liberties as a result of the measures enacted by the Bush
Administration, whether government warnings about possible terrorist
attacks on Americans were useful or harmful, and the likelihood of
another terrorist attack in the United States in the next few months.
Respondents were queried on how much attention they paid to the 2004
presidential campaign, whether they would vote to re-elect George W.
Bush, whether George W. Bush or a Democratic nominee would likely win
the election in 2004, whether foreign policy or domestic issues mattered
more in deciding who to vote for, whether candidates should spend more
time talking to voters or explaining their positions, and what one issue
candidates should discuss. Respondents were asked for their opinions of
Democratic presidential nominees John Kerry, Joe Lieberman, John
Edwards, Howard Dean, and Dick Gephardt, who the Democratic Party should
nominate as its candidate, whether this candidate should be liberal,
moderate, or conservative, which Democratic presidential candidate had
the best chance of winning, whether the respondent was satisfied with
the Democratic nominees, and the likelihood that the respondent would
vote in a Democratic or Republican presidential primary or caucus.
Specific questions addressed whether respondents preferred a Democratic
presidential candidate who would support the war in Iraq or oppose it,
seek common ground with George W. Bush or challenge him, support gun
control or oppose it, and eliminate recent federal tax cuts or keep them
in place. Background variables include age, sex, ethnicity, marital
status, religion, education, household income, political orientation,
political ideology, if the respondent was registered to vote, if the
respondent voted in the 2000 presidential election, and if so, for whom
(Democrat Al Gore, Republican George W. Bush, Reform Party candidate Pat
Buchanan, or Green Party candidate Ralph Nader).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03918.v3
Bush, George W.icpsrcampaign issuesicpsrcivil rightsicpsrDean, HowardicpsrEdwards, JohnicpsrGephardt, DickicpsrIraq WaricpsrLieberman, Joeicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrterrorist threaticpsrvoter attitudesicpsrterrorismicpsrTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3918Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03918.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21920MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21920MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #2, January 2007
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2008-09-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21920NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This call-back poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. This survey, fielded January 10, 2007, is a call-back of the January 1-3, 2007, cohort CBS NEWS MONTHLY POLL #1, JANUARY 2007 (ICPSR 21360).
A subset of respondents were re-interviewed immediately after President George W. Bush's speech to the nation on January 10, 2007. Those who had watched the speech were asked whether they approved of the president's plans concerning the war in Iraq. All call-back respondents were asked whether they had confidence in President Bush's ability to make the right decisions on the war in Iraq, what the United States should do now in Iraq, the likelihood of stability in Iraq in the near future, their views on the Iraqi government, and whether the president should have to get the approval of Congress to increase the number of United
States troops in Iraq. This data collection also includes responses to the original poll conducted a week earlier. Topics in the original poll addressed the newly elected United States Congress, the condition of the national economy, the Iraq war, as well as respondents' opinions of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and the potential 2008 Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, education level, household income, marital status, religious preference, military service, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status and participation history, and the presence of children and household members between the ages of 18 and 24.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21920.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrEdwards, Johnicpsrforeign policyicpsrGiuliani, RudolphicpsrGore, Alicpsrhealth care costsicpsrHussein, SaddamicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, JohnicpsrKucinich, DennisicpsrMcCain, Johnicpsrnational economyicpsrnutritionicpsrObama, BarackicpsrPelosi, Nancyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrReid, HarryicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21920Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21920.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04096MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04096MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #2, May 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4096NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their
opinions of the 2004 presidential campaign and the candidates, the way
George W. Bush was handling certain issues, political advertising,
gasoline prices, religious beliefs in the election, the war in Iraq,
the prisoner abuse scandal in Iraq, and same-sex marriage. Background
information on respondents includes voter registration status, party
identification, voting record in the 2000 election, marital status,
sex, religious preference, education record, age, ethnicity, income,
and reachable call-back phone numbers.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04096.v1
abuseicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsreconomic conditionsicpsrEdwards, Johnicpsrgasoline pricesicpsrhomosexual relationshipsicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, JohnicpsrMcCain, Johnicpsrpolitical advertisingicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrprisoners of waricpsrreligious beliefsicpsrterrorismicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesTPDRC I. TerrorismCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4096Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04096.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR21921MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR21921MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #3, January 2007
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2008-09-26Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR21921NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded January 18-21, 2007, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicits public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked whether they approved of the way President George W. Bush was handling the presidency. They were also asked to give their opinions on other issues such as foreign policy, to rate the condition of the national economy, to identify the most important problem facing the country, and to say whether they approved of the way Congress was handling its job. Opinions were solicited on the newly elected Congress, whether the United States was ready to elect a woman or a Black president, and which candidates respondents would vote for in the 2008 presidential race. A series of questions asked for respondents' opinions of Vice President Dick Cheney, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and the potential 2008 Democratic and Republican presidential candidates.
Information was collected on the Iraq war, including whether the United States did the right thing in taking military action against Iraq, whether the number of United States troops should be increased, whether Congress should block funding for the war in Iraq, how important a stable democracy in Iraq is to the security interests of the United States, and whether the United States' involvement in the Iraq War is comparable to its involvement in the Vietnam War.
Information was also collected on whether respondents watched or listened to President Bush's speech earlier in the month on the war in Iraq, whether they were going to watch President Bush's State of the Union address on January 23, and which issues they would like Bush to spend more time talking about.
Additional topics include the Social Security system, tax cuts, the Duke University lacrosse team sexual harassment case, embryonic stem cell research, abortion, global warming, immigration, and racial bias within the United States criminal justice system. Demographic information includes sex, age, race, education level, household income, marital status, religious preference, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural), political party affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status and participation history, and the presence of children and household members between the ages of 18 and 24.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21921.v1
attitudesicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrfederal budgeticpsrforeign policyicpsrglobal warmingicpsrimmigrationicpsrIraq Waricpsrnational economyicpsrObama, BarackicpsrPelosi, Nancyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrpublic opinionicpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrsexual assaulticpsrsocial securityicpsrstem cell researchicpsrterrorismicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrvoting behavioricpsrabortionicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)21921Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR21921.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04478MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04478MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll #4, March 1996
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2008-04-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4478NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, fielded March 31-April 2, 1996, is part of a
continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on
the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues.
Respondents were asked to give their opinions of President Bill
Clinton and his handling of the presidency, foreign policy, and the
economy. Respondents were asked about the condition of the national
economy, their own household's financial situation, and how well
members of the United States Congress were doing their jobs. A series
of questions addressed the 1996 presidential election, including how
much attention respondents were paying to the election, for whom they
would vote, which issues were important in their vote, and the changes
that would take place if Bill Clinton or Bob Dole were elected in
November. Opinions were solicited on presidential candidates Bill
Clinton, Bob Dole, Pat Buchanan, Ralph Nader, and Ross Perot, as well
as Elizabeth Dole, Colin Powell, Vice President Al Gore, First Lady
Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic and Republican parties. Views were
sought on the current primary system, the benefits of a third
political party, whether it was better for the president to belong to
the same political party that controlled Congress, and the role of the
federal government in promoting traditional values and solving
national problems. Additional topics addressed abortion, school
uniforms, a proposed minimum wage increase, and the V-chip, a computer
chip that allowed parents to control television viewing. Information
was also collected on whether respondents considered themselves part
of the Christian conservative political movement, whether they were
employed in a blue-collar job, how concerned they were that they or a
member of their household would become unemployed in the next year,
and whether they listened to political call-in radio shows.
Demographic variables include sex, race, age, household income,
education level, type of residential area (e.g., urban or rural),
religious preference, political party affiliation, political
philosophy, and voter participation history and registration status.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04478.v1
Powell, Colinicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrabortionicpsrBuchanan, Paticpsrcampaign issuesicpsrClinton, BillicpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrDole, BobicpsrDole, Elizabethicpsrfederal governmenticpsrGingrich, NewticpsrGore, Alicpsrjob lossicpsrNader, Ralphicpsrnational economyicpsrPerot, Rossicpsrpersonal financesicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrreligious righticpsrRepublican Party (USA)icpsrtelevision viewingicpsrthird partiesicpsrUnited States Congressicpsrwages and salariesicpsrvoting behavioricpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4478Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04478.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04013MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04013MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll, February 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2009-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4013NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll, conducted February 2004, is part of a series of
monthly polls that solicit public opinion on political and social
issues. Views were sought on President George W. Bush and his handling
of the presidency, the economy, and foreign affairs, as well as the
2004 presidential campaign and the situation with Iraq. A series of
questions addressed whether President Bush shared the same priorities
as the respondent, whether he became a war president because of world
events or the choices he made, and whether he brought different groups
of Americans together or divided them. Respondents were asked about
the condition of the national economy, whether the country was going
in the right or wrong direction, and the effect of the Bush
administration's policies on taxes and jobs. Several questions asked
whether the result of the war with Iraq was worth the human and
economic costs, whether it was a part of or separate from the war on
terrorism, whether the United States made the correct decision in
taking military action against Iraq, and whether it made the United
States safer or less safe from terrorism. Opinions were solicited on
whether the alleged weapons of mass destruction in Iraq existed,
whether it mattered if they were found, whether the Bush
administration told the entire truth about the existence of these
weapons, and how well the Bush administration and United States
intelligence agencies assessed the threat of weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq prior to the war. Respondents were also polled on
how much attention they paid to the 2004 presidential campaign,
whether they planned to vote for President Bush or a Democratic
candidate, whether their mind was made up yet, the issue they most
wanted candidates to discuss, whether they planned to vote in a
Republican and Democratic primary or caucus, and whether the current
system of primaries and caucuses produced the best presidential
candidates. Questions regarding the Democratic presidential nomination
addressed who the party should nominate, the main reason respondents
would like to see that person nominated, whether respondents had ever
supported nominee Howard Dean, their impressions of nominee John
Kerry, and their level of satisfaction if Kerry won the nomination.
Respondents also gave their opinions of the Republican and Democratic
parties, how important it was for a president to have served in the
military, and whether a candidate's personal character and values or
position on issues was more important in their vote. Background
variables include age, sex, religion, religiosity, education,
ethnicity, household income, marital status, number of telephone lines
in household, political party affiliation, political orientation, and
voter participation and registration history.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04013.v3
Bush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsrcampaign issuesicpsrDean, HowardicpsrEdwards, Johnicpsrintelligence agenciesicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, Johnicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpresidencyicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrpresidential performanceicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrtaxesicpsrterrorismicpsrvoting behavioricpsrTPDRC II. Terrorism and Preparedness Survey Archive (TaPSA)ICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4013Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04013.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04095MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04095MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News Monthly Poll, May 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
2005-12-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4095NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their
opinions of the 2004 presidential campaign and the candidates, the way
George W. Bush was handling certain issues, the economy, the war in
Iraq, and the prisoner abuse scandal in Iraq. Background information
on respondents includes voter registration status, party
identification, voting record in the 2000 election, marital status,
sex, religious preference, education record, age, ethnicity, income,
and reachable call-back phone numbers.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04095.v1
abuseicpsrBush Administration (George W., 2001-2009)icpsrBush, George W.icpsreconomic conditionsicpsrIraq WaricpsrKerry, Johnicpsrnational economyicpsrpolitical partiesicpsrprisoners of waricpsrRumsfeld, DonaldicpsrterrorismicpsrTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4095Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04095.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26147MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26147MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/MTV Monthly Poll, April 2008
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
MTV
2009-10-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR26147NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This special topic poll, fielded April 10-15, 2008, is a part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. The focus of this data collection was the opinions of adults 18 to 29 years of age on the 2008 presidential election and other issues. Respondents were asked about the most important issue facing their generation at the present time and twenty years into the future, whether the country was moving in the right direction, the condition of the national economy, and job opportunities for people in their generation. Views were sought on the 2008 presidential campaign, differences between the Democratic and Republican parties, the amount of influence their generation would have in deciding the next president, the most important issues in their vote, their opinions of the presidential candidates, whether the 2008 campaign focused too much on the candidate's race and gender, and whether African Americans or women faced more obstacles as candidates for president and in everyday life in America. Information was collected on whether respondents had already registered or planned to register to vote in the 2008 general election, whether they planned to or had already voted in a Democratic or Republican primary or caucus in their state, for whom they would vote for if the general election were held that day, whether they had been personally contacted by a political campaign and asked to register to vote, and whether they had ever been involved in a political campaign. A series of questions asked respondents how they got their information about politics, their use of social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, and Friendster, and whether they had ever visited a political or campaign Web site, watched a political video or campaign advertisement on a video Web site like YouTube, and had ever posted anything about politics on the internet, such as in a blog or chat room. Additional topics addressed the Iraq war, how much impact MTV could have in raising awareness among young people about political issues, and whether respondents were familiar with MTV's "Choose or Lose" campaign. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, education level, marital status, whether respondents had children under 18 years of age, household income, political party affiliation, political philosophy, voter registration status and participation history, religious preference, and whether respondents considered themselves to be a born-again Christian.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26147.v1
attitudesicpsrnational economyicpsrnational electionsicpsrObama, Barackicpsrpersonal financesicpsrpolitical campaignsicpsrpolitical interesticpsrpolitical partiesicpsrpolitical participationicpsrpresidential candidatesicpsrpresidential electionsicpsrcampaign issuesicpsrprimariesicpsrpublic opinionicpsrsocial issuesicpsrsocial networksicpsrtelevision newsicpsrvoter attitudesicpsrvoter registrationicpsryoung adultsicpsrClinton, HillaryicpsrDemocratic Party (USA)icpsrinformation sourcesicpsrInterneticpsrIraq Waricpsrjob opportunitiesicpsrMcCain, JohnicpsrICPSR XIV.C.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Public Opinion on Political Matters, United StatesCBS NewsMTVInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26147Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26147.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04162MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150331s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04162MiAaIMiAaI
CBS News/MTV Monthly Poll, September 2004
[electronic resource]
CBS News
,
Music Television (MTV)
2005-04-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4162NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-31.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This poll is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys
that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other
political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their
opinions of the 2004 presidential campaign and the candidates,
Republican incumbent George W. Bush and Democratic Senator John
Kerry. Specific questions addressed the state of the national economy,
the war in Iraq, ter