Araiza-Calzada arose in an unusual procedural setting: plaintiffs settled their monetary claims under the AWPA and other statutes, however finalization of the settlement was contingent on submission to the Court for a declaratory ruling addressing the legal issue of whether, prospectively, oyster shucking at Defendant Webb’s oyster processing facilities should be covered by the statute. The principal question for the court was whether oysters were “agricultural or horticultural commodities” within the meaning of the AWPA, a term which the statutory scheme did not define and an issue upon which the Court located little regulatory guidance. Judge Smoak found that Congress did not intend for oyster (or other seafood) workers to fall under the AWPA and that oysters were not such an agricultural commodity. Judge Smoak concluded that the AWPA, and its predecessor statute, had their roots in the FLSA’s definition of agriculture which, in the judge’s view, was “clear [as of] 1938, [and that] Congress intended ‘agricultural’ to be limited to the land.” The Court found “no evidence that Congress has changed its mind” and thus declined to extend the AWPA’s definition of agricultural work to the sea.

Jackson Lewis P.C.

About Jackson Lewis

Jackson Lewis P.C. is a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in major cities nationwide serving clients across a wide range of practices and industries. Having built its reputation on providing premier workplace law representation to management, the firm has grown to include leading practices in the areas of government relations, healthcare and sports law. Named the "Innovative Law Firm of the Year" by the International Legal Technology Association, the firm’s commitment to client service and depth of expertise draws clients to Jackson Lewis for excellent value-driven legal advice.