Many finance-oriented critiques start from the position that our problems largely
stem from the financial/political dominance of Elitist cartels and cabals. Clearly,
the malinvestment, exploitation, predation and disregard for the law that characterizes
the rule of political-financial Elites in both developed and developing nations have wreaked
havoc on societies and economies around the globe.

Implicit in this critique is a dangerously naive assumption: if all our problems
can be traced back to Elitist cabals such as the Federal Reserve and the European
Central Bank, then it follows that the subjugation or eradication of these concentrations
of self-serving power would remove the cause of our problems.

Alas, that would be a welcome step in the right direction, but that alone would not
resolve the structural causes of our devolution. Freeing ourselves of self-serving
Elites would certainly create an opening for structural transformation that is currently
impossible, but the transformation will require changing much of what the average
citizen takes for granted as a "given" or even "right."

For a little perspective on what lies ahead, let's consider the structural problems that
remain even if we were fortunate enough to throw off the yoke of the Fed, the corporate
cartels, and the entire system of Elitist dominance.

1. We would still have mountains of debt that will never be paid and enormous losses
to write off. It would be
nice is we could place all the inevitable losses as phantom assets are exposed to
price discovery on bankers and Elites, but the reality is that these assets are
distributed throughout the economy: as these phantom assets vanish, pension funds,
insurance companies and other bulwarks of non-Elite wealth/security will have to
write off significant portions of their assets.

Citizens will ultimately find their wealth/financial security has been degraded, perhaps
severely. It's tempting to think that a "debt jubiliee" on (for example) student
loans would "solve the problem," but this is not a pain-free solution: the $1 trillion
in student loans are someone's assets, and the "someone" is not necessarily a banker
or billionaire: it might be the pension fund that is paying Mom or Dad's pension.

The unpayable debts are only symptoms of a deeply flawed system. To see the debt as
the problem is to ignore the system which created the "need" for that debt: in the
education cartel, that is the entire system of "higher education," which is fundamentally
a "skimming operation" not unlike its partner in crime, the financial industry and
central State that creates and enforces the debt.

In other words, simply writing off debt does not address the structural causes of the
debt. That will require a massive revolution in our understanding and delivery
of education, and a wholesale elimination of tens of thousands of "skimming" positions
within the education complex.

That means tens of thousands of people will lose their high-paying jobs.

You see the point being made here: living within our means requires a massive structural
downsizing of assets, employment and expectations. An economy that has lived on
the creation of debt (phantom assets) cannot be transformed by the mere writedown of debt:
the entire structure that created and enforced that debt must be torn down, and everyone
who skimmed off a profit or livelihood from that reliance on the machinery of debt will
experience a decline in their standard of living.

2. We would still have a global economy facing the constraints of higher-cost
energy and commodities. As we all know, it's easier to create phantom wealth than
it is to create real goods such as grain, energy, gold, etc. Phantom assets are ultimately
claims on A) income streams or B) real-world assets, and so all phantom assets are
ultimately claims on a limited resource, either a commodity or an enterprise.

You can "grow" phantom assets to near-infinity, but that near-infinite sum of money
will still distill down to a claim on limited resources and income streams.

As I have often noted here (thanks to correspondents Bart D. and Harun I.), energy
may well be abundant at a certain price; what will be scarce is the cash/income to
pay for that "abundant" energy. Abundance of a commodity that has a high cost-basis
due to real-world constraints does not lead to lower prices: if it takes one barrel of
oil to extract and refine three barrels of shale oil, the cost of those barrels cannot
drop below the cost of extraction, refining, return on the capital invested, labor costs,
etc.

Sellers of oil below cost will rapidly deplete their capital and go bust.

Eliminating Elites is a first good step, but it does not magically eliminate the
constraints imposed on a phantom-asset based system. Living within our means will
require a massive reduction not just in phantom assets but in the income that has been generated
by those phantom assets. It won't just be bankers and billionaires who will be poorer;
everyone with exposure to the financial system and the real-world costs of the FEW
essentials (food, energy, water) will be poorer in terms of purchasing power.

3. As Status Quo policies fail, replacement policies will become less predictable
in their implementation and unintended consequences. Recognizing that a policy has
failed is only a first step; understanding the structural causes and designing a policy
that won't alienate all the vested interests while addressing the problem is
politically impossible until the crisis has left the Status Quo no other choice.

But there is very little history that informs the confluence of crises we now face;
the more replacement policies diverge from the mainstream, the more unpredictable their
comsequences become. As the saying has it, the road to Heck is paved with good
intentions, and policy choices that seem common-sense in crisis could issue disastrous results.

Political expediency is a powerful force for unintended consequences. Even if we
got rid of the Fed and
various financial Elites, the losses trickling down to the Main Street economy
would still be large enough to cause powerful vested interests (union and municipal pension
plans, for example) to support Status Quo "saves" of phantom assets and the
machinery of debt-creation.

Political expediency will not vanish along with the Fed; vested interests will still seek
to impose self-serving policies that have not been thought out or tested in the real world
on smaller scales. they will attempt to conserve their own wealth and power at the
expense of the general citizenry or politically weaker rivals.

We are like passengers on the Titanic ten minutes after its fatal encounter with the iceberg: though our financial system seems unsinkable, its reliance on debt and financialization has already doomed it.

We cannot know when the Central State and financial system will destabilize, we only know they will destabilize. We cannot know which of the State’s fast-rising debts and obligations will be renounced; we only know they will be renounced in one fashion or another.

The process of the unsustainable collapsing and a new, more sustainable model emerging is
called revolution.

Rather than being powerless, we hold the fundamental building blocks of power. We need neither
permission nor political change to liberate ourselves. A powerless individual becomes
powerful when he renounces the lies and complicity that enable the doomed Status Quo’s
dominance.

"This guy is THE leading visionary on reality.
He routinely discusses things which no one else has talked about, yet,
turn out to be quite relevant months later."
--Walt Howard, commenting about CHS on another blog.

NOTE: gifts/contributions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email
remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Eric T. ($60), for your fabulously generous contribution to this site--
I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

I would be honored if you linked this essay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use.

Terms of Service:
All content on this blog is provided by Trewe LLC for informational purposes only. The owner of this
blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information
on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable
for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information.
The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or
use of this information. These terms and conditions of use are subject to change at
anytime and without notice.

Making your Amazon purchases
through this Search Box helps support oftwominds.com
at no cost to you: