June 19, 2012

Ready to fight back?

Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week.

You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Support Progressive Journalism

The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.

Fight Back!

Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week.

You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Travel With The Nation

Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.

Sign up for our Wine Club today.

Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?

The Advancement Project has joined forces with the Fair Elections Legal Network, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, and Project Vote to file a lawsuit against the state of Florida to stop an initiative that attempts to remove “non-citizens” from voter registration rolls via a mass-purging process formed from questionable methods. The lawsuit would cover the entire state and would suspend the voter purging for at least a year. To date, dozens of Floridians and US citizens have come forward stating that they were wrongly identified as “non-citizens” and are at risk of losing their right to vote. The Department of Justice is also suing Florida over the program. We caught up with The Advancement Project’s co-director Penda Hair and asked her to explain the lawsuit, the problems with Florida’s voter purging initiative and the history of voter discrimination in the state.

Voting Rights Watch 2012: Now that this lawsuit against Florida has been filed, what’s next in the process to block Florida’s voter purging initiative?

Penda Hair: The lawsuit is filed in Miami with the federal Southern District Court of Florida. We are asking for a preliminary injunction to block the program. This would be an emergency ruling that will move more quickly than a normal civil suit, and we expect the court to take this up very quickly. We believe this is a case where the voters themselves can have their voices heard. We will bring Florida voters to court so they can make their case about how this program is affecting them. It’s a broad-based effort in terms of public education and activism and obviously the legal complaint. The Advancement Project has been doing voting rights work in Florida since the 2000 elections—I think this is our fifth or sixth lawsuit here—and we are very familiar with these kinds of shenanigans.

It is, in fact, well within the state’s right to purge ineligible voters from their lists. What exactly is wrong with how Florida is doing it?

One thing is that it is discriminatory on the basis of race and language status. The Advancement Project’s research has confirmed that 87 percent of the people on Florida’s purge list are people of color and more than 50 percent are Latinos. So while states are allowed to make their lists more accurate they can’t target people of color for purging in the process. Congress found that there has been a history of certain states using lists like Florida’s to target minorities for purging, so they have determined that certain types of massive systematic purges cannot happen ninety days before a federal election, and Florida’s purge program illustrates why Congress was correct in making that determination.

The facts are the facts. They probably did start investigating this last year and I understand that as soon as Scott was elected governor he was asking about how he could find people who aren’t citizens. But that doesn’t matter. Under the National Voting Rights Act, it is the day that the program is finished that makes it a violation of the law or not, and it can’t finish within ninety days of a federal election for purging purposes. [Florida has a primary on August 14.]

Florida state officials are saying they did not intend to target Latinos with this program, but does that matter, so long as it has a discriminatory impact?

We are suing under the Voting Rights Act Section 2 which prohibits policies that have discriminatory results. This was defined very clearly by Congress, which says you do not have to prove a bad purpose or discriminatory intent to show violation of VRA. The courts will look at the history of voter discrimination, the impacts of the new policy and the justification of the policy and then will determine under the totality of those facts if there is a discriminatory result. We’re confident that the courts will find that all of those factors line up—it has an overwhelming discriminatory impact, there’s a history of voter discrimination in the state and very little justification for doing this right now.

Of course they will argue that the justification is preventing voter fraud, right?

Let’s be real. There is no significant voter fraud in Florida. I’ve been doing voting rights work for twenty-five years and we always hear this mantra of voter fraud. What’s happening is the people who are attacking voters don’t want people of color participating at same rate and with the same ease as other voters, so they come up with one excuse after another and they label it under voter fraud, but the real fraud is that people aren’t being allowed to vote because this is voter suppression.

Other states are implementing or attempting similar voter purge programs. How would your lawsuit affect those states?

We hope that this lawsuit sends a strong, strong message to all states that this is illegal and they should not do it, and if they follow Florida’s program they will be sued.

Despite the requests from civil rights group and the Department of Justice to Florida to stop this purging initiative, there seems to be a lingering chilling effect, which might frighten people who could be mistaken for “non-citizens”—Latinos and Caribbean Floridians in particular—from voting. Have you already encountered this?

Absolutely, the state can put 2,000 people on a purge list and intimidate millions of people from voting. That’s what we are hearing from Latino and Haitian communities, that they are afraid that police will show up at their homes, and go through their documents just because they had the audacity to register for the right to vote. Florida is just flouting federal law, and Florida has done this repeatedly.

Most of the county supervisors of elections have decided not to comply with the state’s purge program, which means effectively there is no program. Why is it still important to move forward with this lawsuit?

What the counties have done is said we’ll halt this until legal clarification around the program is achieved. Well, we plan to clarify the legal situation. We want voters and Florida communities to know that they can vote without fear, and that is a real important message to send to counter the voter intimidation. We also have evidence, though, that two counties are continuing the program and are purging. We know that they are under pressure from outside activists like the Tea Party and Judicial Watch, as well as the state of Florida to continue purging.

—Brentin Mock

Brentin MockTwitterBrentin Mock covers national politics for Colorlines. He previously served as lead reporter for Voting Rights Watch 2012, covering the challenges presented by new voter ID laws, suppression of voter registration drives and other attempts to limit electoral power of people of color.
Brentin is also a contributor for Demos’ blog PolicyShop, where he covers voting rights and civil rights; and also a blogger for Grist.org, where he writes about environmental justice. You can read some of his other work at Next American City, Facing South, The Root, In These Times, American Prospect and The Washington Post.

Voting Rights WatchIn-depth coverage of voter suppression efforts nationwide from Brentin Mock and Aura Bogado, in partnership with Colorlines.com.
Brentin Mock is a New Orleans–based journalist who serves as lead reporter on Voting Rights Watch, covering the challenges presented by new voter ID laws, suppression of voter registration drives, and other attempts to limit electoral power of people of color. In his previous position as senior editor at The Loop 21, Brentin also covered electoral politics with a significant amount of reporting on voter ID issues.
In New Orleans, Brentin also works as web editor for the online, citizen-journalist driven blogsite Bridge the Gulf and helped launch the New Orleans online investigative news site The Lens. He previously worked at The American Prospect as a reporter and blogger covering environmental justice issues through a fellowship awarded by the Metcalf Institute for Environmental Reporting. Brentin also served on the staff of the national magazine Intelligence Report, published by Southern Poverty Law Center, investigating hate groups and anti-immigrant nativist extremists.
Brentin's professional career began in his native city of Pittsburgh, working as managing editor of the African-American community newspaper Renaissance News before joining the staff of the alternative newsweekly Pittsburgh City Paper. His work has been published in GOOD, the Root, the Daily Beast, Newsweek.com, the Grio, The Atlantic, Next American City, Truthout.org, Alternet, Vibe.com, XXL, The Source and Religion Dispatches.
Follow Brentin at @bmockaveli.
Aura Bogado is the community journalism coordinator and blogger for Voting Rights Watch 2012. Aura has reported in Spanish and English from Mexico, Peru, Argentina, and the United States. Her work has been published in Mother Jones, Newsweek Argentina, AlterNet, and The Huffington Post. With the support of the Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute, she conducted an in-depth examination on the consequences of immigration enforcement by local police in Arizona.
Aura has worked as a national host and producer for the Pacifica Radio network. While there, she also coordinated a media literacy and training program for youth of color in Los Angeles with a grant from the California Technology Foundation. She was a founding member of 33+1/3 Books Collective, an independent bookstore and gallery in Los Angeles. In 2006, City Lights Books published The Other Campaign, which featured her exclusive interview with Subcomandante Marcos, his first in five years.
She earned her B.A. from Yale University, majoring in American Studies. An immigrant from South America of indigenous (Guarani) decent, she is currently based in New York, and plays son jarocho music in her spare time.
Follow Aura at @zapallita.