I had a dream/nightmare a few nights ago that a M9-10 hit Alaska and I seldom ever dream. In my dream I saw the Red circle on the globalincident Map.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15170057

funny u say that...that was how i saw one in a dream i had.....and im convinced its going to happen!!!!...although mine wasnt alaska it was west coast

Quoting: Nanna-Ree

Where on the West coast? Mine seemed to be just off the Alaska/BC border coast, so it was the west coast.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15170057

In my dream, the giant red dots were in Indonesia (Pacific area-north of NZ, and west of Panama by 500-1000 miles out in the ocean. I also very rarely dream.

In another, I saw the sun set, rise, then move across the landscape before it started shooting "bolts" from it and a massive tsunami ensued.--only dreams I have remembered in several months.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20366969

I don't usually remember my dreams but several years ago I was off planet looking at earth and I saw a large body from outer space come by and everything on earth turned to dust. Don't worry it was painless.

This was written on Oct 28th, and take a look at what he called for Nov 7-8.

November 7-8: possible 7 plus

November 13-14: 6.5 plus

November 15-16: 6.5 plus

November 20: 6 plus

November 22-23: 6.5 plus

November 28: 7

December 4-5: 7 plus

December 11: 7 plus

December 17-18: 8 plus

December 21: 10 plus"

Quoting: Wash

If that 10 plus happens in a remote area, I can guarantee you that NONE will be the wiser the next day. It is not going to change anything, even if it happened.

And even if it hit a populated area, so what? Big deal.

A few million fatalities would be but a drop in the bucket. And the world will surely still carry on like before.

Think logically.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27640275

If it hit in the middle of an ocean the tsunami it could cause could be massive. There are huge populations on coastline. Many would not recieve warnings soon enough as their local govt has not prepped for this type of emergency.I live in a city of between 400 - 500 thousand, on the Atlantic Ocean. I'd be surprised if they could warn us all fast enough to evacuate...and that's just 1 small city.

Quoting: Wash

My comment was made in the context of what this Geryl was saying all along... that 2012 was THE year for mega disasters, and he was pushing pole shifts and solar flares that would wipe out most of the world.

This was written on Oct 28th, and take a look at what he called for Nov 7-8.

November 7-8: possible 7 plus

November 13-14: 6.5 plus

November 15-16: 6.5 plus

November 20: 6 plus

November 22-23: 6.5 plus

November 28: 7

December 4-5: 7 plus

December 11: 7 plus

December 17-18: 8 plus

December 21: 10 plus"

Quoting: Wash

If that 10 plus happens in a remote area, I can guarantee you that NONE will be the wiser the next day. It is not going to change anything, even if it happened.

And even if it hit a populated area, so what? Big deal.

A few million fatalities would be but a drop in the bucket. And the world will surely still carry on like before.

Think logically.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27640275

If it hit in the middle of an ocean the tsunami it could cause could be massive. There are huge populations on coastline. Many would not recieve warnings soon enough as their local govt has not prepped for this type of emergency.I live in a city of between 400 - 500 thousand, on the Atlantic Ocean. I'd be surprised if they could warn us all fast enough to evacuate...and that's just 1 small city.

Quoting: Wash

My comment was made in the context of what this Geryl was saying all along... that 2012 was THE year for mega disasters, and he was pushing pole shifts and solar flares that would wipe out most of the world.

What happened to all that?

Looks like he is scaling down to just a 10 mag earthquake?

That was my point.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27640275

To be completely honest I don't follow much of what he says or has said. It just caught my eye his accuracy with these quakes.

If that 10 plus happens in a remote area, I can guarantee you that NONE will be the wiser the next day. It is not going to change anything, even if it happened.

And even if it hit a populated area, so what? Big deal.

A few million fatalities would be but a drop in the bucket. And the world will surely still carry on like before.

Think logically.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27640275

If it hit in the middle of an ocean the tsunami it could cause could be massive. There are huge populations on coastline. Many would not recieve warnings soon enough as their local govt has not prepped for this type of emergency.I live in a city of between 400 - 500 thousand, on the Atlantic Ocean. I'd be surprised if they could warn us all fast enough to evacuate...and that's just 1 small city.

Quoting: Wash

My comment was made in the context of what this Geryl was saying all along... that 2012 was THE year for mega disasters, and he was pushing pole shifts and solar flares that would wipe out most of the world.

What happened to all that?

Looks like he is scaling down to just a 10 mag earthquake?

That was my point.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27640275

To be completely honest I don't follow much of what he says or has said. It just caught my eye his accuracy with these quakes.

Quoting: Wash

Well, I guess it has dawned on all these doomsday guys that the world is too big with too many people in it to change in 38 days so they are now all scaling back drastically.....

If it hit in the middle of an ocean the tsunami it could cause could be massive. There are huge populations on coastline. Many would not recieve warnings soon enough as their local govt has not prepped for this type of emergency.I live in a city of between 400 - 500 thousand, on the Atlantic Ocean. I'd be surprised if they could warn us all fast enough to evacuate...and that's just 1 small city.

Quoting: Wash

My comment was made in the context of what this Geryl was saying all along... that 2012 was THE year for mega disasters, and he was pushing pole shifts and solar flares that would wipe out most of the world.

What happened to all that?

Looks like he is scaling down to just a 10 mag earthquake?

That was my point.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27640275

To be completely honest I don't follow much of what he says or has said. It just caught my eye his accuracy with these quakes.

Quoting: Wash

Well, I guess it has dawned on all these doomsday guys that the world is too big with too many people in it to change in 38 days so they are now all scaling back drastically.....

No more world changing events.

A 10 mag earthquake is not going to change the world.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27640275

Not everything will happen in one day. Try this:

1. Sun becomes bigger after Dec 21 20122. Pole Shift after Dec 21 2012 in a period of 3 months until March 2013. Areas below 400 meters below sea level goes down to the sea.3. Some of us acquiring supernatural abilities

If you look at the math on this there are 15 quakes a year 7.0 or bigger. That's one every 24 days. So with a two day window of prediction that gives you a one in 12 chance of being right just by random selection. Additionally, there are 7.0 + quakes that he is not predicting.

If you go below 7.0 there are 134 earthquakes a year between 6 and 6.9. If you go with a two day window on those you have a 74 percent chance of being right just with random selection.

And lets not forget the DATE I CIRCLED in YELLOW on TWZ for this quake...

So a major 7 mag hits the EXACT Date & PRIMARY Region I warned just north of the OREGON COASTLINE in QUEEN CHARLOTTE, B.C. on 10/27 PST

OH, and YES it hit within 170 miles from a PRIMARY MERKABA LEY-LINE of 188!

Even a TSUNAMI warning was issued as I said one would ;)

Now since such quake of this massive size with a 10 mile depth has a minimum affected area/rupture radius of about 175 miles from epicenter (which would easily come within 100 miles of a key line if not less than 50 or even 20 miles), you could say this HIT DIRECTLY ON THE LINE!

So with the 6.7 - 6.8 on 10/20 that struck VANUATU and the 6.6 - 6.9 that struck Costa Rica on 10/23, that makes the total so far 2 for 2 or an almost perfect score for 2 of the 3 Quake Warning Windows with ALL of these quakes again hitting the Ley Lines! Can U SAY Wow?

2 for 2 already surpasses all the skeptic stats and ridicule thats been going on here.

some more pertinent FB links for those wanting to see more discussions about these warnings:

Which would be an even a bigger long-shot and highly UNLIKELY, so if another 6.7+ let alone MAJOR 7+ magnitude hits this next 3rd window in a row I've warned about, I submit the ODDS would be ASTRONOMICAL!

Will there be any serious academic analysis from USGS and the scientific community on these warnings or the ley lines?

Probably Not.

But doesn't matter at this point. The evidence is incontrovertible now and those who ignore and deny it will only look foolish.

Todays quake in BC has already once again validated yet another set of warnings, what i've presented in my videos and the 188 Ley-Lines far beyond any reasonable doubt.

Eventually this will become the Elephant in the scientific communities room as more and more evidence piles up and they run out of places to hide from it.

ALL windows must have at least a minimum M6.8 ALL windows 90% chance/confidence of an M7+ to M8+ All dates +- 1 day All quakes expected to strike the 188 Ley-Lines within 150 miles(but not required for a hit)

Good thing we just had a tsunami drill here in Hawaii. We did really well evacuating in record time. A little more organization and we'll be able to get everything we own to higher ground when the real one comes.

So if you haven't seen all my videos let alone my quake warnings for ALL MAJOR quakes in 2012 and since i began posting quake warnings in 2011 thats now reached a 90% hit ratio just for MAJOR QUAKES, If you're interested and are able to understand the subject matter I present connected to Ancient Sacred Geometry with the Ley Lines of 188 I've discovered, I highly recommend checking them ALL out as I think you might find them very interesting to say the least.

Now the thing is, If I lowered the magnitude to 6.0 to 6.5 as my windows ALL USED to be earlier this year, I'd have an almost 99% success rate for nearly EVERY LARGE to MAJOR quake thats occurred in 2012 not even to mention my accuracy in 2011. But since quakes 6.5 and under are more common now than ever, once you understand the stats and my warnings let alone all that I've presented in my videos, anyone that posts such warnings lower the parameter to including 6 to 6.5 quakes like that and uses that as a basis or measure to validate their work and/or predictions, is tainting their work or creating a false impression when taken in CONTEXT or totality.

I think PG has some good information and I like some of his work, but I do have an issue with him claiming just "large quakes" under 6.5 add to his "portfolio" or merit of what he's claiming let alone the fact his warnings are NOT CLEARLY archived nor does he or anyone address what I've just explained especially since as I've also said, his work and predictions are based on other peoples research and information that I'm not seeing him give any credit to.But since you seem to be a supporter, I'm open to you helping me answer some of these questions or address some of my points.