Hold Congress Accountable

About FreedomConnector

Find activists, groups, and events right in your own neighborhood. Join FreedomConnector to get involved and learn more about key issues threatening our economic freedom. Whether you’re looking for like-minded people, trying to boost your existing group’s impact, or simply trying to stay up on current events, FreedomConnector is the place to start. See what’s happening in your state today!

Search FreedomWorks

Resources

Blog

Obama's Ridiculous Plan For Higher Education

In this month's State of the Union Address the president put forth a plan to make college tuition more affordable. The proposal was met with praise in most quarters on the left, but surprisingly little attention from the right.

The only explanation I can think of for this involves political demographics. With student loan debt surpassing credit card debt before recently reaching $1 trillion, the nation’s students are understandably desirous of lowered tuition. Sifting through the comments sections of news articles it’s not uncommon for me to see people say things like “It is morally wrong to force college students into debt without the possibility of paying it back.” Such rhetoric worries Republicans who in the aftermath of 2012 are primarily concerned with broadening their appeal.

Republicans have been treading lightly over the issue of government subsidized student loans, wary of disenfranchising the coming generation of younger voters. This was obvious in the way Gov. Romney handled such questions in the debates last fall.

A clear expression of why government involvement in student aid is harmful has not been articulated on a national scale. Republican politicians meekly claim to be against expanding Pell Grants but find themselves unprepared to respond to attacks from the left, attacks labeling them as hostile to promoting widespread higher education.

Instead of futilely attempting to refute such claims it would be wiser to assert that widespread college education is exactly what’s wrong with our higher education system.

That’s right.

The progressive flaw in understanding was revealed by the following asinine statement from the president.

“The more education you've got, the more likely you are to have a good job and work your way into the middle class,” Obama said.

Yeah, actually no.

48% of college graduates are currently working jobs that don’t require degrees.

It's the nature of our economy that progressives fail to grasp. College degrees were once valuable because they signified that the degree holder possessed a rare and specific skillset. When everyone has a four-year degree employers will look for other qualifications to identify the people they need.

Our unhealthy focus on getting a “college degree” has meant that young adults who are in no financial or academic position to attend college feel the need to do so. In short, getting a four-year degree is not a right and might even be against your interests.

The myth that success is guaranteed to individuals with a four-degree has been the motivating factor behind the drastic rise in college enrollment over the last few decades. Parents have bought into the notion that their children’s success is dependent on a Bachelor’s degree. This means many high school graduates feel pressured into college. Most never even consider vocational school which would leave them debt free and almost guaranteed a decent job.

The government’s actions over the last 70 years have helped with this problem. Pell grants and the GI Bill were introduced to make college more affordable and available to the wider population. As college enrollment increased the worth of a college degree declined. And as the government increasingly subsidized college education universities felt comfortable raising their tuition.

In his speech Obama laid out a proposal to withhold federal funds from universities which fail to lower their tuition rates to the government’s satisfaction. He said institutions of higher education need to discover innovative ways to keep costs down. This is ironic because it is the Democrats who for years have called for fixing education with increased funding.

This doesn’t mean the left is any less in favor of publicly funded higher education.

Often you will hear progressives advocate a free tuition system like that in Germany. The German’s however are smart enough to recognize that not everyone is suited for college. German children are tested before secondary school and separated into either a Gymnasium or a Hauptschule. The first prepares students for college while the latter prepares them for vocational school.

Such a system would be strongly opposed in America, but the German model is the only way a nation can hope to subsidize higher education with any degree of competence. If Americans are unwilling to follow that path then it would be best to withdraw all federal funds subsidizing college loans and universities.

es advocate a free tuition system like that in Germany. The German’s however are smart enough to recognize that not everyone is suited for college. German children are tested before secondary school and separated either to a Gymnasium or a Hauptschule. The first prepares students for college while t

"Si, Se Puede" President ObamaMany Republicans and Democrats cannot figure out exactly why President Obama is absent on the Colombia Free Trade Agreement. President Obama obviously believes that free trade is valuable and recently applauded himself when he returned from South Korea with a signed FTA in his hand. So why isn’t Colombia, one of our only democratic allies in South America “worthy” of a similar agreement?GOP Senate Leader Senator Mitch McConnell can’t figure this out either and recently published on Oped in the Miami Heral

The protests in Wisconsin remind us of issues that transcend unions, pensions and budgets. It is the often neglected principles of the rule of law and fairness. As former AFL-CIO president George Meany noted, “It is impossible to bargain collectively with government.”

“Alò Presidente” is the name of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez’s unscripted propaganda talk show, which Chavez demands all “privately owned Venezuelan media outlets broadcast every Sunday from 11:00am to 5:00pm. “Alò Presidente” features Chávez addressing current events of the day and visiting locations where government social welfare programs are being implemented.

President Obama recently released an op-ed article in the Wall Street Journal entitled, “Toward a 21st-Century Regulatory System”. This article contained a myriad of policy advancements culminating in an executive order aimed at reducing the potentially onerous regulatory encroachments of the ever indulging bureaucracy (my words, not his of course). One could only hope he would start with Obamacare.

Recently, President Obama reiterated the necessity for increased government “investing” in our economy. The way the President’s argument is shaped it seems like government has been standing out of the way, back in the shadows, just waiting to emerge amidst the calamity created by an unfettered deregulated private sector. The only way we will be competitive in the successive years, of course, is if we spend more taxpayer money on liberal pet projects and “invest” in special interest groups slobbering to indulge in the government subsidy trough.

Amazingly and audaciously, the mainstream media and liberal pundocracy has created a narrative that President Obama’s newly found centrism is molded in the inspirational optimism of President Reagan. This narrative seems confusing, when many liberals excoriate Reagan’s economic policy as the grim reaper of capitalism coming to instill all the inequities of the free market.

During President Obama’s speech in Cleveland, he indicated that he still wants to raise taxes on small businesses making over $250,000 a year on January 1st. He criticized House Minority Leader John Boehner for wanting to extend tax cuts to the "rich" claiming that these were "not new ideas." He stated:

Today, Politico’s Arena featured an online debate over the results of the automobile industry’s bailout. Many of the contributors have hailed the bailout as a success due to the perceived growth in the auto industry and, namely, in Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.