The LGA found three-quarters of local authorities overspent in 2015-16 as the pressures on children's services grow

Three-quarters of local authorities are overspending on their children’s services budgets and services are being pushed to “breaking point”, council leaders have warned.

Analysis by the Local Government Association (LGA), published today, found that councils spent £605 million more than was budgeted on children’s services in 2015-16.

The association is now warning that pressures on children’s services are becoming unsustainable, and predict that there will be a £2 billion funding gap by 2020 unless extra resource is made available.

“The huge financial pressures councils are under, coupled with the spike in demand for child protection support, mean that the limited money councils have available is increasingly being taken up with the provision of urgent help for children and families already at crisis point, leaving very little to invest in early intervention,” the LGA said.

‘Tipping point’

The predicted 2020 funding shortfall was first highlighted in the LGA’s submission to the 2016 Autumn statement. It calculated this by projecting how children’s services costs would rise in line with demand, inflation and population growth, on the one hand, and what would happen to funding levels, on the other.

Councils currently spent £11.1 billion a year on children’s social care and education services, and the LGA estimated that by 2019/20 a combination of increased costs and reduced grants would leave them £1.894 billion short.

A survey carried out by the ADCS, and answered by 69 councils, indicated there would be an 8% reduction in children’s services budgets between 2015-16 and 2016-17, with leaving care support services and asylum seekers likely to be hit.

‘Crisis’

Richard Watts, chair of the LGA’s Children and Young People Board, said the sheer amount councils were overspending by demonstrated the scale of the “crisis” faced by children’s social care teams.

Watts criticised £500 million of cuts to the Early Intervention Grant since 2013 as something that had made a difficult situation worse. The grant was instrumental in paying for early support services like children’s centres and drug and alcohol misuse services for young people.

As a result of the cuts, Watts said councils “cannot afford” to invest in early intervention at the expense of child protection services, and have been forced to close hundreds of children and youth centres since 2012.

“The reality is that services for the care and protection of vulnerable children are now, in many areas, being pushed to breaking point. Government must commit to the life chances of children and young people by acting urgently to address the growing funding gap,” Watts said.

A government spokesperson said councils will receive £200 billion for local services up to 2020 as part of a “historic four-year settlement which means councils can plan ahead with certainty”.

“Councils are doing excellent work, spending more nearly £8bn in total last year on children’s social care, but we want to help them make sure they do even more. That’s why we set up the our £200 million Children’s Social Care Innovation Programme to help them develop new and better ways of delivering these services,” the spokesperson added.

“The volume of referrals, high thresholds and the complexity of need and support for children, families and adults is ever increasing,” said BASW chief executive Ruth Allen. “BASW members are reporting high caseloads, finite resources and not having enough quality time to undertake direct work with the children and families they serve.”

“We urge the government to meet collectively with BASW, the LGA and other key organisations to discuss how we put vulnerable children, families and adults at the heart of government funding policy and invest in good quality social work and the social care workforce,” she added.

Chloë Cockett, policy and research manager at charity Become, said children in care feel social workers don’t have enough time to spend with them, are changed too often and their placements are unstable.

“These are all symptoms of a system under pressure, and which all have an impact on the lives of children who are cared for by the state,” Cockett said.

She added: “We have to ensure that all children get the support they need to thrive, both in and out of the care system, and we urge the government to reassess the way that it is currently funding children’s social care and ensure that local government is able to support all children properly.”

One consequence of IR35 is that it now costs councils more! Charge out for locums has not changed but as agency workers they can now claim from the employer things like work mileage. Before, a self employed worker put through their ltd co as a business expense

After this, then accuse Local Govt of being ‘inefficient’ and ‘not fit for purpose’ ‘wasteful’ and all the other things that are softening Ch Serv up for the vultures waiting in the wings – just look at who are on the Boards and/or already have a foot in the door of ‘back office’ services to see who and what is coming over the next four years

Agreed. This isn’t retail, you can’t just order less vulnerable people or close a few area offices to reduce your costs. There isn’t enough money and there is increasing demand. If they really employed market forces to their thinking they would invest to meet demand.

What about cases where children are removed over concerns over home conditions slipping due to ill health and they push for adoption. Then the truth comes out the mum had 3 different illnesses but they still push for adoption with them makes the mum believe she being punished for being ill. Then so they don’t use the illness as a reason they use in courts lies told by the her ex’s partner who has hated the mum in questions. And the mums brother lies about her and her 3rd to. But they make this information only known once placement orders are given so the mum can’t defend herself against the lies. And why if all social workers are trained the same do some go for adoption as the only option even when there were genuine reasons for struggling yet some help the families till they no longer need help. I mean I had 2 social workers know I couldn’t have my home spotless by 10am so did visits at different times to make sure it was clean. And 1 thinks if your home aibt a show home spotless at all times your neglecting your child and why do some Not understand baby led weaning. This mum was accused of neglecting her child need to do tummy time yet not once did she ask mum why. As she was advised by a health visitor not to as when he layed in his tummy he screamed in pain for to a large hernia. It was so bad they talked about operating sooner than normal it was only because it went down they said it will happen if needed when 2.

Our website uses cookies, which are small text files that are widely used in order to make websites work more effectively. To continue using our website and consent to the use of cookies, click click 'Continue'. Find out more.