Madonna by Mert & Marcus for Interview May 2010

Love her or hate her, the queen of pop nabs the cover of this month’s Interview photographed by Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott. Taking on ensembles from the likes of Versace, L’wren Scott and Givenchy, the musician gets rebellious with the help of lace, leather and a few dangerous accessories styled by Karl Templer.

Amazing pics…she actually looks good in person. Ive seen her up close without makeup a couple times and she's very pretty and youthful. dont be fooled by the doctored fake papparazi pics you see online.

Amazing pics…she actually looks good in person. Ive seen her up close without makeup a couple times and she's very pretty and youthful. dont be fooled by the doctored fake papparazi pics you see online.

I grew up, watching Madonna as an emerging artist, she was different, she was bold, she was beautiful.
I loved it. I was fascinated by her.
I was a teenager, watching Madonna continuing her different, bold & beautiful character.
I was captivated.
I'm still watching Madonna, being bold, having her own identity & persona.
I admire her, she's worked hard (not only physically, but that as well). She's really achieved something.

I grew up, watching Madonna as an emerging artist, she was different, she was bold, she was beautiful.
I loved it. I was fascinated by her.
I was a teenager, watching Madonna continuing her different, bold & beautiful character.
I was captivated.
I'm still watching Madonna, being bold, having her own identity & persona.
I admire her, she's worked hard (not only physically, but that as well). She's really achieved something.

Might I add, at the end of the day, we're not looking at editorials to look at realistic young/middle aged people. We're looking at them to see breathtaking gods & goddesses in dream-like locations/garments/stories.

If you want real people, real pictures & real news, I suggest cnn.com (Mind you, even their photographers use photoshop – be warned)

Might I add, at the end of the day, we're not looking at editorials to look at realistic young/middle aged people. We're looking at them to see breathtaking gods & goddesses in dream-like locations/garments/stories.

If you want real people, real pictures & real news, I suggest cnn.com (Mind you, even their photographers use photoshop – be warned)

Madonna is a true Icon, and as expected, everything she does or puts out will always be judged. I for one am a fan of hers, and she looks FABULOUS for 51, I'd rather see her photoshopped than botoxed beyond recognition…http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

Madonna is a true Icon, and as expected, everything she does or puts out will always be judged. I for one am a fan of hers, and she looks FABULOUS for 51, I'd rather see her photoshopped than botoxed beyond recognition…http://www.chungkitblog.wordpress.com

keep drinking your hateraide!!! Who cares if it is photoshopped, you have to have the canvas to look like that before photoshop anyway… can't you just enjoy the art of ALL aspects of the shoot?? The lighting, the wardrobe, the makeup &&&&& The photoshop!!! Anyone who talks shit is just jealous and that's ALL it comes down to…

keep drinking your hateraide!!! Who cares if it is photoshopped, you have to have the canvas to look like that before photoshop anyway… can't you just enjoy the art of ALL aspects of the shoot?? The lighting, the wardrobe, the makeup &&&&& The photoshop!!! Anyone who talks shit is just jealous and that's ALL it comes down to…

I am a religious man and I believe that using crucifix in an advertisement is blasphemy. Furthermore, Madonna uses it in somewhat inappropriate way. I consider this as an offence. And even furthermore, a person, writing books for children should not do such things. it is extremely immature, cheap and disrespectful. I am surprised noone noticed it. Or did I miss something and this type of thing became normal?

I am a religious man and I believe that using crucifix in an advertisement is blasphemy. Furthermore, Madonna uses it in somewhat inappropriate way. I consider this as an offence. And even furthermore, a person, writing books for children should not do such things. it is extremely immature, cheap and disrespectful. I am surprised noone noticed it. Or did I miss something and this type of thing became normal?