I think Alts are all going deeper, and at this point there will not be a BTC correction cause it truly is a great addition to anyone's portfolio, the only correction coming is in Alts, they are undervalued at the time cause the only digital currency is an Altcoin - Bitcoin has become more than it was built to be and cannot be used to buy coffee or pizza without a high transaction fee, yet if crypto is what you want to pay with there is 10 or 20 coins that have less of a fee - I personally use LTC when I move my crypto value but thats cause its what I am familiar with.

Send me a message if you need me to respond to a post, or just send me some LTC in an amount that will get my attention = LPaabWwnvPLRbJE8T3wdUihNQbhEv5dEvvLeave a short note

I feel like the correction already occurred earlier today when it was close to 20K and dropped just below 16K. Seems to me the last few times it’s dropped 2-4K last week and back in November it just shot back up

but what a china company can do in china while they are restricting cryptos ?

Everything like everywhere in the world. China as well USA and Singapore restricted just participation on ICO and only for their citizen. Chinese, USA and Singapore companies can do ICO where they want. They just want to protect naive people to not fall into fraud.

But good thing of ICO on Neo is that they are controled-safe not wild west like with ETH.

Is there such definition as "network congestion" for the Neo blockchain? What is the avg fee for a transaction?Please explain me a scenario where the dApps on Neo blockchain become as sluggish as dApps on Ethereum.

South Korea announces that your are all too stupid to invest in ICO's and so will only let "professionals" invest in ICO's.

"Bitcoin is complicated in its technology and investment method. So considering its risk and technology expertise, it is right for professional investors to do an ICO, not regular citizens who are not informed of its technology and complicity.”

Three things to consider when choosing a blockchain for your project — or why Veris chose NEO.

.........Bitcoin handles this through a UACOMMENT function on the client miners are using to signal support for software updates. As demonstrated by the speculation around prospective Bitcoin forks over the past year, this method is not particularly effective.Ethereum utilizes the Ethereum Foundation to manage this process — though it is important to note that there is no signalling/voting mechanism in place similar to Bitcoin.Ultimately, we determined that none of the existing solutions adequately meet our governance needs. What we do feel is that the NEO design of splitting coins from network fees is a foundation on which we can develop a voting system to handle governance. Interestingly enough, one of the chains developed to specifically address blockchain governance, Tezos, has experienced some of the worst governance problems in the blockchain space.

Community

When we use the term community we are essentially evaluating what traction the chain has in the mind-share of developers — which should thus increase the availability of developers. Bitcoin is the oldest and has arguably the strongest, most entrenched community, whereas the Ethereum community may be the largest and is growing the quickest. Cryptonote, IOTA, and NEO all had much smaller communities in the spring of 2017. Since then, both IOTA and NEO have had exceptional community growth. Particularly NEO with their City of Zion group of independent developers.With these three criteria in mind we chose NEO. Note that this write up is certainly not exhaustive, and I’m certain we are missing chains as well as capabilities of the chains listed in this article that supporters feel better support our use case. The purpose of this was to walk through how one firm worked through the evaluation process. Ultimately, different chains are better fits for different use cases — for ours, NEO is the best fit.