9-11 "truth" goes woo-woo

Just in case anyone is still interested in 9-11 truth theories and their most recent iterations.

Just my cursory view and have not explored any of these new ideas in any depth. However, I think I see some underlying common threads that have nothing to do with objectively seeking facts and truth.

I have noticed several people who have commented prominently regarding seeking of the truth of what happened on 9-11-01 are now putting forth various, but quite similar, theories about "what hit" the World Trade Center 2, the South Tower.

Richard D. Hall - the original proposer of the hologram hypothesis with new hypothesis

Some, but not all, of the common threads of these new 9-11 truth ideas are...

The object that "hit" WTC2

was actually a drone somehow made to appear as a plane.

A Boeing Drone, model E 10, was actually what was presented as United Airlines Flight 175, WTC2 "hit"

The drone had a large "pod" on its underbelly which was actually a missile.

The missile exploded upon impact with WTC2 and its mission was to provide distraction so that other elements of the destruction could ensue without detection.

The idea of the plane shaped gash in WTC1 North Tower is no longer thought to be a cartoon-like, Wiley Coyote, computer-generated imprint image. A drone of a specific type could in fact leave a real wing shaped destruction imprint in the side of the building.

Replies to This Discussion

I do not rule for or rule out any of the information any of these commentators are now putting out, but I do think it is rather odd that they all seem to be coming out at the same time and seem to depart fromr normal critical analysis of 9-11 data and evidence.

Watch for buzz words, phrases and concepts of Dr. Greer in support of Dr. Judy Wood's Directed Energy Weapons theory of 9-11

I do not rule for or rule out any of the information any of these commentators are now putting out, but I do think it is rather odd that they all seem to be coming out at the same time and seem to depart fromr normal critical analysis of 9-11 data and evidence.

Watch for buzz words, phrases and concepts of Dr. Greer in support of Dr. Judy Wood's Directed Energy Weapons theory of 9-11

I take that back about recommending BrightEon, Real.video, as being a good place to post videos other than YouTube. Mike Adams is Alex Jones v 2.0, only not as dramatic in acting form.

I just sent an email to Russ Winter of WinterWatch.net briefly summarizing my ideas about this new batch of 9-11 theories all having the same basic propositions, however, I choose not to post that here at this time. It looks like no one is looking at these new batch of theories in the aggregate in relation to continuing 9-11 research.