1. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]Don't forget to remove some EHP and/or self-rep capability from NPC dreads while you're doing this change. Right now, a carrier's only barely able to overcome the local repair of NPC dreads. Removing this much damage from light fighters is going t...
- by Querns - at 2017.06.09 10:47:51

3. Sticky:[Summer] Pirate Battleship Cost Intervention - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread] T-B0NE wrote: So if you have a specific problem you want to address, then address it in a way that is specific to only that problem (AKA increase the mineral price of the ship or nerf the drop rate of the BPC). By nerfing escalation chances you...
- by Querns - at 2017.06.08 18:25:35

4. Sticky:[Summer] Pirate Battleship Cost Intervention - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]A simple increase in materials will do quite a bit to solve The Machariel problem, assuming balance changes are off the table. I'm not so sure BPC drop rates are going to do much, but there's no reason not to make them more rare.
- by Querns - at 2017.06.08 18:07:21

5. Sticky:Monthly Economic Report - May 2017 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Cave Orr wrote: Can you show a graph of player count or fun over time in eve? this, like most of the other graphs out there, would have to be by region, and would have delve dominating as usual
- by Querns - at 2017.06.08 18:03:40

8. Sticky:Monthly Economic Report - April 2017 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]The bonus graph is missing the porpoise. Or, perhaps, no one tried to mine in it? I was going to use the data there to build a case for buffing the yield of the porpoise a bit, as it is underperforming compared to the original vision as a miner e...
- by Querns - at 2017.05.05 21:38:25

9. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]If you think highsec ganking is easier now, let me tell you about getting 5+ barge kills in a single smartbombing run. Consistently. Barge/exhumer EHP has been radically increased since the good ol' days.
- by Querns - at 2017.04.25 10:56:35

10. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Djsaeu wrote: If you want player feedback that is not affected by the big alliances, then why not make it where a CSM can not be in or affiliated with any big alliance. There are Pro's and Con's with this. Pro : You get more feedback from th...
- by Querns - at 2017.04.22 16:53:54

13. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sonya Corvinus wrote: Querns wrote: But lowsec has local chat, as well. By your own words, local allows you to be 100% safe in all circumstances. Thus, lowsec is identical to nullsec in terms of risk profile. In fact, it may be safer, since ...
- by Querns - at 2017.04.22 00:34:53

14. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sonya Corvinus wrote: Querns wrote: Ah, here we go -- we're finally starting to strip away the dross and find the real hatred buried within. So in your previous posts, you claimed that I should move my alts to nullsec, so I would have to en...
- by Querns - at 2017.04.22 00:26:06

16. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sonya Corvinus wrote: Querns wrote: BTW: "Risk" isn't a word you add to any aberrant abortion that drips out of your brain. Your use of the word belies a complete misunderstanding of even the basics of the topics you're trying to ape. So ...
- by Querns - at 2017.04.22 00:13:36

17. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sonya Corvinus wrote: Querns wrote: Of course not. I'd just repurpose them for nullsec. The primary reason I have any highsec alts is A) shopping in Jita, and 2) production. The bulk of my guys are for 2. Shifting my production to nullsec-a...
- by Querns - at 2017.04.22 00:01:17

18. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]I understand that it may be troubling for some of you to become fully aware of just how alone you are, but it's better to come to terms with it in a safe environment, like this thread, rather than under adversity later.
- by Querns - at 2017.04.21 23:29:14

19. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] oiukhp Muvila wrote: Granted Eve Online has always had some of that element since launch, but emergent game-play that resulted in far more organization has resulted in what many consider to be cancer to the game. This just in: organization...
- by Querns - at 2017.04.21 23:14:02

20. The CSM G혀 Council of Sov. Management. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sonya Corvinus wrote: Querns wrote: If such a change came to pass (let's set aside the fact that it'd be impossible,) I'd just move my alts to nullsec, then maybe set up a false-flag candidate for highsec. Keep setting up these little glass...
- by Querns - at 2017.04.21 23:09:59

COPYRIGHT NOTICEEVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.