Authors

Document Type

Article

Disciplines

Election Law

Abstract

In recent years, the courts have invalidated a variety of campaign finance laws while simultaneously upholding disclosure requirements. Courts view disclosure as a less-restrictive means to root out corruption while critics claim that disclosure chills speech and deters political participation. Using individual-level contribution data from state elections between 2000 and 2008, we find that the speech-chilling effects of disclosure are negligible. On average, less than one donor per candidate is likely to stop contributing when the public visibility of campaign contributions increases. Moreover, we do not observe heterogeneous effects for small donors or ideological outliers despite an assumption in First Amendment jurisprudence that these donors are disproportionately affected by campaign finance regulations. In short, the argument that disclosure chills speech is not strongly supported by the data.

Recommended Citation

Spencer, Douglas M. and Wood, Abby K., "In the Shadows of Sunlight: The Effects of Transparency on State Political Campaigns" (2016). Faculty Articles and Papers. 473.
https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_papers/473