cannabisnews.com: Changes Proposed in Bill Upset MMJ Advocates
function share_this(num) {
tit=encodeURIComponent('Changes Proposed in Bill Upset MMJ Advocates ');
url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/27/thread27819.shtml');
site = new Array(5);
site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit;
site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500');
return false;
}
Changes Proposed in Bill Upset MMJ Advocates
Posted by CN Staff on January 16, 2014 at 15:32:44 PT
By Rachel La Corte, The Associated Press
Source: Associated Press
Olympia -- Supporters of the medical-marijuana system in Washington crowded a public hearing Wednesday to decry a proposal to change it. The Health Care & Wellness Committee held its first hearing on a measure seeking to overhaul the state’s medical-marijuana system in order to reconcile it with the new, legal recreational market.The changes under the bill sponsored by Rep. Eileen Cody, D-West Seattle, include reducing the amount of marijuana and number of plants that patients can possess; doing away with collective gardens; and establishing a patient registry.
Lawmakers have worried that the largely unregulated medical system would undercut the taxed, recreational industry. Meanwhile, U.S. Justice Department officials have warned that the state’s medical-pot status quo is untenable.“Neither one can move forward if we don’t get regulated,” said Cody, the committee chairwoman, after the hearing.She said she was confident the measure had enough support to advance and that House and Senate members are working together on the issue. “I think something will move,” she said of the bill’s chances for approval.The state has allowed medical use of marijuana since 1998, and the passage of Initiative 502 last year allowed the sale of the drug to adults for recreational use at licensed stores, which are expected to open by this summer.But several medical-marijuana advocates say the changes will affect their access unfairly.Ryan Day, of Thurston County, told lawmakers his 5-year-old son has intractable epilepsy and was having more than 100 seizures a day until he started taking an extracted liquid form of medical marijuana.Day said he wants to grow the plants his son needs at home but that the bill is too limiting and wouldn’t allow him to do so. “Under the current proposal, we wouldn’t be able to provide the medicine my son needs,” he said.Day said extracts require more plants than the proposed law allows. And to purchase the medicine from an authorized store would cost him more than $15,000 a year.“If this bill goes through, you’re going to put me and my family in the impossible situation of treating our son and becoming criminals,” he said. “We are good taxpaying, law-abiding citizens who just want to help our son.”In December, the state’s Liquor Control Board gave its final recommendations to the Legislature about how it believes the medical system can be brought under the umbrella of Initiative 502.It suggested allowing licensed I-502 stores to sell medical cannabis, which would be subject to the same high excise taxes as recreational pot. However, patients who sign up for a proposed mandatory state registry of medical-marijuana users would be exempt from sales taxes. The board called for patients to be allowed to grow six plants. Under current regulations, they can grow 15.The board also suggested eliminating collective gardens and reducing how much pot patients can have from 24 ounces to 3 ounces — which is still more than the 1 ounce adults are allowed under the recreational law.A separate bill being heard by the House Finance Committee would create a sales-and-use tax exemption for qualified patients who purchase marijuana or marijuana-infused products for medical use from authorized retail outlets licensed by the Liquor Control Board.Cody’s bill doesn’t address the taxing structure but does integrate the suggestions on reduced number of plants and the number of ounces possessed by a patient, as well as the elimination of collective gardens. However, her bill also eliminates the ability for patients to grow their own cannabis after July 1, 2020, which one Republican lawmaker on the panel questioned.“At this point you would be establishing a Liquor Control Board monopoly after 2020,” said Rep. Matt Manweller, of Ellensburg, a response met with applause by supporters of medical marijuana in the crowd.Source: Associated Press (Wire) Author: Rachel La Corte, The Associated PressPublished: January 15, 2014Copyright: 2014 The Associated PressCannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help
Comment #2 posted by The GCW on January 16, 2014 at 22:44:02 PT
Tell government to get out of the way.
Sick people should have no regulations regarding cannabis. Should grow what they want and not have to consider government at all.Simply leave people alone. Let sick people be. They already have enough problems.
[ Post Comment ]
Comment #1 posted by schmeff on January 16, 2014 at 18:26:22 PT
New Regulations
Creating more ways to arrest cannabis consumers, "legal" or not...here we come.
[ Post Comment ]
Post Comment