In an interview in Colombo, Wickremesinghe defended a deal last year that gave a joint venture led by state-owned China Merchants Port Holdings Co Ltd a 99-year lease to the southern port of Hambantota. The agreement gave Sri Lanka $1.1 billion in revenue at a time when it’s spending 80 percent of government revenues on servicing outstanding debts.

“On Hambantota, the burden is off us, because China Merchants and the Sri Lanka Ports Authority have taken it over,” Wickremesinghe said on the sidelines of a business conference on Monday.

“We’ve been looking at inviting a broad range of foreign investors,” he said. “Initially the investors will come from China, Japan, India. Then the others will follow. We’d like to see them coming in from Europe.”

Since Wickremesinghe took power in 2015, he’s been under pressure to improve Sri Lanka’s finances. A previous administration secured billions of dollars worth of Chinese loans after the South Asian nation emerged battered from three decades of civil war in 2009, contributing to a debt burden that threatens to impede economic growth.

‘Tough years’

Even with the sale of Hambantota and other concessionary measures, Sri Lanka has been forced to pursue other revenue-raising measures, including a recent tax reform. The country’s total debt to China was $5 billion at the end of 2017, according to government treasury figures.

“It’s an easing of the Chinese part of the debt burden, but we have the international sovereign bonds, so 2018, 2019 and 2020 are going to be tough years for us,” Wickremesinghe said.

Sri Lanka’s $1.5 billion 2027 bonds fell 9 cents on the dollar this year to 96.4 cents on Tuesday, near a record low since issuance last year, according to Bloomberg-compiled data.

The country has $1.5 billion in dollar bonds due in 2019 and another $1 billion in 2020, according to the data. Sri Lanka last paid a $500 million dollar bond in 2015.

India worries

Sri Lanka was an early participant in China’s infrastructure-building plans that eventually became the Belt and Road Initiative backed by hundreds of billions of dollars in financing. Still, its appetite for Chinese cash waned after the debt burden forced it to sell the Hambantota port back to China Merchants Port Holdings.

The deal also prompted concern in India about its geopolitical rival China using a port close to its southern coastline for future military or strategic uses.

Public anger over Chinese debt helped Wickremesinghe rise to power three years ago with President Maithripala Sirisena in a coalition government that pledged to reevaluate China-funded projects they alleged were corrupt. But faced with few good options, the government has since negotiated concessions — including turning a Chinese freehold land reclamation project in Colombo into a long lease — while largely pushing ahead with the projects.

The administration’s sale of the Hambantota port in a debt-for-equity swap to China has been criticized by former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, who had originally courted Chinese investment for his home district of Hambantota before losing power in 2015. A new political party backed by Rajapaksa triumphed over the ruling coalition parties in local elections in February.

Wickremesinghe said Monday that Sri Lanka needs to “focus on what is achievable and doable” by courting Asian investors first.

“Just as much as there is the Belt and Road Initiative, the Japanese are also taking a big initiative — and the Indians,” he said.

Japan is interested in investing in the Colombo port, as well as the undeveloped east coast port of Trincomalee, a colonial-era British naval base, Wickremesinghe said. Indian investors have also expressed interest in a Chinese-built airport in Hambantota that’s barely used and has been criticized as a politically motivated Rajapaksa-era project.

ranils agenda from the start was to sl a second singapore with US aid and in order to achieve this myopic objective he put on hold and most likely terminate most if not all chinese projects pledged to impress the US. The US response was cold and ranil/sirisena clique was left holding the proverbial can. Europe mainly the Bitish was all talk and little to show. The Indian attitude remained complacent and with Chinese contracting to run Hambantota was hostile and probably considered taking over assets a liability to have Chinese as neighbors.
This nothing more than a pipe dream of Ranil to expect the Japanese to invest in Sri Lanka for the government has not been able to contain the social unrest in the country a manifestation of a failed economy.

Is Sri Lanka walking on a tight rope performing a balancing act in a circus? Are we depending on foreign investments exclusively? Are we incapable of finding a solution within our country rather than selling/leasing our assets? Why we have to keep our neighbours happy rather than making Sri Lankans (within the country) happy? It is like giving Candy to two naughty children to keep them happy. Is Sri Lanka a nanny for India & China?