Since the Pentagon refuses to release
any of the 85 videos the FBI claims don't show the impact of Flight 77
into the Pentagon, any other supporting photos, OR not one Flight
77 part with its identifying part number, we have found rare photos
from a German website (Made in USA as was 9/11) that make it crystal clear that a
A3 Skywarrior substituted for Flight 77 hit the front Pentagon masonry
wall like a bug on a windshield. What did the Pentagon do with the passengers
of Flight 77?

Eyewitness Vin Narayanan, USATODAY.com:

The hijacked jet slammed into the Pentagon
at a ferocious speed. But the Pentagon's wall held up like a champ. It
barely budged as the nose of the plane curled upwards and crumpled before
exploding into a massive fireball. The people who built that wall should
be proud.

During an appearance on The Power Hour
radio program today, USAF Col. George Nelson (ret.), a 30 year veteran,
aircraft accident investigator and expert in aircraft maintenance and aircraft
identification, stunned listeners by stating that in regard to the 911
attack at the Pentagon, "I didn't see any damage on the sides of that
hole, anything that would say that an airplane that size could have gone
through a 16 or 18 ft. hole." He was referring to the hole seen at
the Pentagon before the collapse of the e-ring. He went on to say, "There
would be large parts of that wing lying on the ground on the outside. It
wouldn't all go through that holeIt is impossible for all of the time change
parts that have these serial numbers that are trackable to the specific
aircraft, it is impossible for them to be totally destroyed where these
serial numbers could not be read." www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm

When asked to express his opinion in
regard to the controversial photographs and video showing an anomaly attached
to the belly of the plane that struck the South tower and the mysterious
"flash" that occurred as the plane made contact, Col. Nelson
said, "There appeared to be something attached to the belly and there
definitely appeared to be a flash. What caused that flash? Who knows? I
can't explain it and it's just a number of these anomalies like that, that
just makes the entire picture more suspect." The video and photographic
evidence can be seen in the video "911 - In Plane Site." www.911inplanesite.com

Photoanalyst Jack White was kind enough to email that
he believes that the building front portion of the HOLE photo above is
genuine but he believes that the foreground portion in the original photo
NOT THE CLOSEUP USED IN THE ARTICLE was altered. Jack adds that many Pentagon
photos are not genuine. For his analysis of numerous Pentagon photos please
visit: