In what way does it suck on Linux? The only problems I have had have been with misbehaving extensions. The core browser is solid and just as good as the Windows version in my experience using it...
–
Russell HeillingJul 15 '09 at 9:37

I wouldn't go as far as to say FF sucks on Linux, but I do see your point. On windows I love FF, whereas it just isn't quite as brilliant on Linux. It's a little clunky in places sometimes. (Middle click scrolling doesn't work for example - maybe it's just my setup)
–
Simon P StevensJul 15 '09 at 9:40

@Simon P Stevens: I have the same middle-click problem, but I think KDE or something else is to blame. Most apps treat middle-click as paste. Firefox used to open links in a new tab when middle-clicked, but I've disabled it now.
–
Nikhil ChelliahJul 15 '09 at 9:50

6 Answers
6

The reason Linux isn’t shown above is that all of the feedback we’ve received so far indicates that Linux users would be happier with a theme that uses native GTK icons in the navigation toolbar, which rules out this type of customized visual treatment.

This was exactly the answer to my question. ( probably poorly written [ the question of course ] ) I didn't knew why it looks good on other platforms but "old" in linux.
–
OscarRyzJul 22 '09 at 15:17

If Firefox is looking "old" in Linux for you it's because your GTK theme is set to an "old" looking one - and let's be honest the default ones are kind of bland if you're using Gnome. In Linux however you are free to customise your GTK theme, and there are hundreds of ready-made ones available using various engines. These include not only look and feel, colours, gradients, etc but also icons. So not only can you apply a sweet theme to Firefox but in Linux you can apply a sweet theme to your whole system (at least, those apps that use GTK themes). This is why Firefox on Linux follows that.
–
thomasrutterMar 17 '10 at 4:36

BTW I'm glad Google Chrome did the right thing and looks great on the three platforms and still respects the default l&f
–
OscarRyzJul 11 '12 at 2:02

Firefox doesn't suck on Linux. It might eat up some resources, indirectly, if you don't use Gnome or GTK and have limited hardware. Or perhaps you've lucked out with a bad build/hardware combination. But from my limited experiences, I don't see a problem.

Edit: Looking at your updated question, I'll say this much: that's different HTML. I get the same image (balloons) every time, so it's not just random. For some reason they chose to have a different background image and layout for each platform; maybe the fonts are slightly different but that's a non-issue.

Or if you're talking about the GUI itself, well, I'm glad it changes per platform. UI integration is always a good thing.

Each version uses a different front end. For example on Mac OS X firefox uses a Cocoa UI - which means it can integrate with other Cocoa applications and the system more easily than if it were written with another API.

Depending on what GUI APIs are used on Windows on Linux (I don't know about windows, but I assume Linux is GTK+) you will see different levels and experiences of integration.

I wouldn't say it rocks on OS X... it's slow, the UI doesn't match the rest of the OS, and so on... I'm using Safari and it works well. I use FF when things don't work (not very often) or when using a download manager to speed up large HTTP downloads.

I was never a huge fan of the icons on Firefox Linux, so I installed the Camifox skin, which is really nice. I'd also suggest reducing the system font size (System > Preferences > Appearance > Fonts). The default on Ubuntu is very large compared to Windows. In that dialog you can also play about with the theme, which Firefox will inherit.

There are loads of other browsers you can install on Linux. Opera is a solid choice, though its default skin is worse than Firefox. Google Chrome v3 is also available - technically in alpha stage but I haven't had any problems with it.

If you really want to you can install IE6 on Linux! Look up ies4linux.