Regardless of whether or not this IS a “Novelty Record”, this is one of the better-written songs on the scene at this time. Great job by the songwriters.

This is as opposed to a lot of the bland, predictable or poorly-written junk that litters the airwaves of “Top 40″ radio these days — many of them actually huge hits.

Trace Adkins may have gone with the “Novelty” a little too much … but this song is not so much novelty as just a fun song written with alot of wit and charm.

And, by the way … Joe Diffie was / is one of the best pure singers in Nashville. Great vocal talent and known as such on 16th Avenue. Tossing him off as some clownish act because he cut a few “novelty” records is extremely arrogant and mean-spirited.

]]>By: Leeann Wardhttp://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/01/07/review-trace-adkins-marry-for-money/#comment-26575
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:21:48 +0000http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=5165#comment-26575I actually listened to this again, since people have been saying that it’s pretty good, but I still can’t get into it. Not even the melody is appealing. At least with “Honky Tonk…”, the melody and production are catchy. And I have nothing against a good novelty song. This just doesn’t sound like one of them to me.
]]>By: Dan Millikenhttp://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/01/07/review-trace-adkins-marry-for-money/#comment-26508
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:37:37 +0000http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=5165#comment-26508I think part of what makes this a disappointing single for me isn’t anything about the record itself, including the song – it’s the context of the release. Like I said, I actually like the song and think it works well within the album, but as a radio release, it comes on the heels of a bunch of other Trace Adkins novelty songs, and while it may be better than the lot of them (though frankly, I think “Honky Tonk Badonkadonk” is really cleverly written for what it is), it’s not brilliant or distinct enough to really stand out from the pack of his releases. I doubt anyone will remember it in a few years, even if it goes to #1.
]]>By: Erikhttp://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/01/07/review-trace-adkins-marry-for-money/#comment-25546
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:43:03 +0000http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=5165#comment-25546This isn’t a putdown of country music or any of its fans, but it’s half-a**ed novelty songs like this one that tend to give country music a red neck and a black eye among people who wouldn’t have been caught dead listening to it in the past, and, if they have their way, won’t be caught dead (or alive for that matter) listening to it in the future.
]]>By: CMWhttp://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/01/07/review-trace-adkins-marry-for-money/#comment-25505
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:27:08 +0000http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=5165#comment-25505I’m with Matt C. on this. I think “Marry for Money” is the rare (these day) novelty song that actually hits its target – it’s nothing more and nothing less than solid, frivolous entertainment. I actually find it funny, whereas “Honky Tonk Badonkadonk” and “I Got My Game On” just seemed stupid and obnoxious to me.
]]>By: Soul Miners Daughterhttp://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/01/07/review-trace-adkins-marry-for-money/#comment-25389
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:13:34 +0000http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=5165#comment-25389Trace… Trace… Trace…..
Just when he gets on my nerves, he releases something memorable. Then I get on board and he jumps back to a goofy novelty song where I wouldn’t claim him.
This guy has so much talent and is capable of much more than he is finding BUT he won’t get off that fence. It would be interesting to see what he would/could do if he called his own shots more, ala a Toby Keith.
]]>By: Matt C.http://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/01/07/review-trace-adkins-marry-for-money/#comment-25354
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:43:59 +0000http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=5165#comment-25354Ben, I don’t think that Kevin’s credibility is on the line, but I also don’t think that a country music critic should tar every novelty song with the same brush. The genre has historically featured a lot of novelty songs and there are artists in the CMHOF who recorded predominately novelty songs. The fact that many contemporary artists and songwriters think they’re a lot more clever than they are shouldn’t impeach the very concept of a novelty song. Thus, these days, it is more important than ever to distinguish good novelty songs from bad novelty songs, and I think that Kevin fails at that task here. That’s all that my objection is about.
]]>By: Hollerin' Benhttp://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/01/07/review-trace-adkins-marry-for-money/#comment-25352
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:26:52 +0000http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=5165#comment-25352come on Matt C, you’re going to raise a fuss about how you disagree with Kevin’s comparative valuation of Trace Adkins novelty songs?

Dude, it’s a Trace Adkins novelty song, short of lavishing it with praise, one’s blog cred isn’t on the line no matter what one says about it. It’s stupid, it sounds bad, it may or may not be somewhat entertaining,.

The last point is where you and Kevin disagree, but it’s not really a substantive issue in the first place.

so yeah, can’t we all just get along?

]]>By: Steve from Bostonhttp://www.countryuniverse.net/2009/01/07/review-trace-adkins-marry-for-money/#comment-25346
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:45:49 +0000http://www.countryuniverse.net/?p=5165#comment-25346Trace is better than this, he has found his voice with some excellent ballads, and now I hope he KEEPS his voice, and lives up to his Opry calling!

IAlso, I do think that Brad Paisley flirts with frivolity and often walks a fine line all too often, but he always seems to pull out of the nosedive with genuine talent before he crashes into sheer silliness..I do think Brad’s novelty songs are usually genuinely clever, and often amusing.

I could do without “Celebrity” and “Alcohol” though…the latter being a staggering headache of a song!