Abstract

Cow–calf efficiency or maternal productivity is highly correlated with total system efficiency of beef production. Balancing the needs of the cow herd with other production components is a daily challenge beef producers address to maximise the number of calves born and raised to weaning and, in turn, maximise maternal productivity. Pressure to satisfy modern consumer needs has shifted selection emphasis to production traits at the expense of fitness traits allowing adaptability to decline. Balancing the needs of the cow herd with production objectives presents cow–calf producers with the challenge of genetically tailoring their cattle to modern needs, while sustainably managing these cattle and natural resources. This balancing act is highlighted by the debate surrounding the application of residual feed intake to reduce costs associated with provision of feed for beef production. Some uncertainty surrounds the relationships between efficiency, production and maternal productivity traits. This review examines key components and definitions of maternal productivity. Management decisions as well as cow and calf traits have important interacting impacts on maternal productivity. Achieving a calving interval of 365 days represents the single most important production issue affecting maternal productivity and is dependent on heifer development during early life and energy reserves (i.e. body condition score) in subsequent years. Management issues such as calving date and selection decisions interact with environmental factors such as photoperiod and production traits such as feed intake, and previous production levels, to influence heifer development and cow body energy reserves. Some proposed definitions of maternal productivity simply include weaning weight per cow mated which can be averaged over all progeny weaned during a cow’s lifetime. Ideally, a definition should include the inputs and outputs of maternal productivity. Some definitions express maternal productivity over large time scales, e.g. a cow’s productive lifetime. Most definitions focus on the cow–calf unit, while some include progeny growth and feed intake to slaughter. This review recommends a definition that focuses on the cow–calf unit, as follows: (weight of calf weaned and cow weight change)/(metabolisable energy intake per cow and calf unit). This definition has the capacity to be scaled up, to include progeny postweaning production, as well as being applicable over varying time scales (e.g. 1 year to a cow’s whole productive life). Improvements in all facets of maternal productivity using this definition can be expected to improve beef-production efficiency.

Johnsson ID, Obst JM (1980) The effects of nutrition during early rearing on the fertility and first lactation performance of beef heifers. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production. Vol. 13’. (Ed. JB Mackintosh) pp. 460. (Australian Society of Animal Production: Perth)

Lowman BG (1979) Pre-calving management and feeding of the beef cow in relation to calving problems and viability of the calf. In ‘Calving problems and early viability of the calf’. (Eds B Hoffman, IL Mason, J Schmidt) pp. 392–407. (Martimus Nijhoff: The Hague, The Netherlands)

Lubritz DL, Forrest K, Robison OW
(1989) Age of cow and age of dam effects on milk production of Hereford cows. Journal of Animal Science67, 2544–2549.

Martinez GE, Koch RM, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Van Vleck LD
(2004a) Genetic parameters for six measures of length of productive life and three measures of lifetime production by 6 yr after first calving for Hereford cows. Journal of Animal Science82, 1912–1918.

Morris CA
(1980a) A review of relationships between aspects of reproduction of beef heifers and their lifetime production 1. Associations with fertility in the first joining season and with age at first joining. Animal Breeding Abstracts48, 655–676.

Morris CA
(1980b) A review of relationships between aspects of reproduction in beef heifers and their lifetime production 2. Associations with relative calving date and with dystocia. Animal Breeding Abstracts48, 753–767.