hama-dev mailing list archives

You're right. Thanks all.
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
2013. 8. 28., 오후 10:09, Yexi Jiang <yexijiang@gmail.com> 작성:
> Mapreduce and BSP are two complemetary computing framework. When facing
> non-iterative computing, people prefer to mapreduce, when facing iterative
> computing, BSP has its advantage. I agree with Anastasis, we need to
> attract people who needs iterative computing to use Hama.
>
> Regards,
> Yexi
>
>
> 2013/8/28 andronat_asf <andronat_asf@hotmail.com>
>
>> IMHO BSP can be advertised as a different computing model to MapReduce,
>> which means that applications might use BSP as a backbone and you might
>> create a different ecosystem around this. You might even get existing big
>> projects (e.g. Hive :P) start working on top of Hama. I think the first
>> target should be to convince (some how) the projects that already use BSP
>> under the hood, to use Hama. I think this is the first step to create a
>> different ecosystem.
>>
>> Kindly,
>> Anastasis
>>
>> On 28 Αυγ 2013, at 11:23 π.μ., Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> IMHO the only thing that makes sense is the latter.
>>> Regards,
>>> Tommaso
>>>
>>> 2013/8/28 Edward J. Yoon <edwardyoon@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/screenshot1.png
>>>>
>>>> During drawing the Hadoop ecosystem diagram, one question has arisen. Do
>>>> you think we can create the another ecosystem around us in the future?
>> or
>>>> should we try to live in harmony with already existing projects in
>> Hadoop
>>>> ecosystem?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>>>> @eddieyoon
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ------
> Yexi Jiang,
> ECS 251, yjian004@cs.fiu.edu
> School of Computer and Information Science,
> Florida International University
> Homepage: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~yjian004/