Both the frequency of hot days and the areal coverage of hot days has rapidly declined in the US. Last year had the smallest areal coverage on record for 95 degree days, with only 55% of US HCN stations reaching 95 degrees during the year. In 1931, 93% of the US reached 95 degrees.

The fraudsters at Climate Central claim the exact opposite of what the data shows. For example, they say that Fond Du Lac, WI will average 89°F during summers in the future.

The frequency of 89 degree days in Fond Du Lac has dropped by two thirds since the 19th century, with the vast majority of thir hot days occurring with CO2 below 350 PPM.

Not only is their claim empirically flawed, but it has no theoretical basis. Radiative transfer models show that the amount of downwelling longwave radiation during mid-latitude summers hardly increases with increasing CO2.

There is no empirical or theoretical basis for the Climate Central claims. They are 100% fraudulent. Climate criminals make Enron accountants look like Mother Theresa.

11 Responses to Hot Days Are Disappearing From The Lives Of Americans

Hey everyone here – pitch in to this guy if you use his material or are interested (if you have not already)…. I gave 5 bucks, its not a lot but give what you can – this gentleman has helped me keep my sanity, and I am sure some of you as well with his diligence, incredible compilation of facts both through graphs and most important historical records – this is no easy job… I plan on giving him 5 bucks a week through at least December when the Knuckleheads meet in their posh Paris setting.

Are they (NOAA) not being paid with our tax dollars, and is not everything that they produce as a result, the property of ‘we the people’? The fact that they refuse to comply with such a subpoena speaks volumes.

This unambiguously states that the atmospheric infrared radiation has equal heating power to the Solar radiation.

In mid winter here at 27 degrees south the Sun is at an effective elevation of ~50 degrees to the normal at midday – 27 + 23.

Using the accepted 0.3 albedo the incident normal radiation is of the order of ~616 W/sqm for 50 degrees – 0.7 x 1370 x cos 50.

When the Sun is low in the sky at say 30 degrees in the morning the incident normal radiation is of the order of ~616 x sin 30 or about 308 W/sqm – roughly equivalent to the radiated power emitted by a block of ice according to the Stefan-Boltzmann equation using the Engineering Toolbox value for emissivity of ice as 0.98.

Hands up all those who consider these 2 radiation values equal. I used a small magnifying glass to burn a piece of timber using ~308 W/sqm solar radiation.

Strangely enough it didn’t work using the IR from a nearby brick wall radiating a higher numerical value of ~375 W/sqm from its 12 degree C temperature using a parabolic metal mirror.

That is what is wrong with computer models – 2 numerically equal values for radiation fluxes in W/sqm can be entirely different in their capacity to transfer energy capable of inducing heating.

Computer models and climate science treat them as equal when really we all know they are not.

The claim that atmospheric downwelling longwave IR has equal heating power to the incident solar radiation is absurd.

Andy. A large segment of the population thinks it’s have no problem allowing people to vote without an ID! A large segment of the population believes that allowing the government to take away their best tool for defense of self and home will make them safer. A large segment of the population believes that the Confederate Flag is evil. A large segment of the population believed that Barack Hussein Obama did such a good job his first term that he needed to be reelected. etc, etc, etc, ad nauseum

All they need to do is keep up the hype for a few more months. As Lord Monckton forecast they got rid of Harper in Canada, and Abbott in Australia and so long as the Rebooblicans continue to sit with their thumbs in their mouths the United Nations will succeed in making the USA a vassal state of the UN with no sovereignty or freedom.

The two biggies to be agreed on in December is a guilt tax on the USA of ONE TRILLION DOLLARS A YEAR, and a WORLD SUPREME COURT to enforce that tax.

If those are agreed to by Obama then it is a done deal. Ratification by the Senate is NOT NEEDED!

DOES US LAW SUPERSEDE INTERNATIONAL LAW?

…Congress and the President act as if signed international agreements override United States national law and the Constitution The following qualifies as one of the greatest lies push upon the American people. That lie is: “Treaties supersede the U.S. Constitution”. The Second follow-up lie is this one: “A treaty, once passed, cannot be set aside”.

However under International Law the President of the United States can sign binding contracts with other Nations. These contracts are considered treaties under International Law and unless their unconstitutionality was manifestly obvious to the other nations at the time the treaty was contracted the United States is stuck with it even if it is later found Unconstitutional within the United States.

U.S. law distinguishes what it calls treaties, which are derived from the Treaty Clause of the United States Constitution, from congressional-executive agreements and executive agreements. All three classes are considered treaties under international law; they are distinct only from the perspective of internal United States law…..”

The official draft text of the climate treaty for the soon-to-start UN Climate Summit in Paris proposes to establish a global Supreme Court that would rule on issues such as “climate justice,” “climate finance,” “technology transfers,” and “climate debt.”
Tucked away on page 19 of the 34-page document is the call for establishing an International Tribunal of Climate Justice. The text, which is still heavily bracketed with text that hasn’t been completely resolved and agreed upon, reads:

“An International Tribunal of Climate Justice as][A] [compliance mechanism] is hereby established to address cases of non-compliance of the commitments of developed country Parties on mitigation, adaptation, [provision of] finance, technology development and transfer [and][,] capacity-building[,] and transparency of action and support, including through the development of an indicative list of consequences, taking into account the cause, type, degree and frequency of non-compliance.”

Courting Climate Tyranny
With all of the world’s politically correct politicians and all of the world’s “progressive” journalistas and Big Media commentariat daily hyperventilating over the ever-growing list of alleged threats and catastrophes caused by global warming, it might be expected that there would be some mention of this planned environmental judicial system for the planet. However, since the text was released on October 20, there has been a virtual blackout in the major media regarding this revolutionary development…