#GIS from a .NET developer's perspective

Disclaimer: This article is written based on Windows 10 Tech Preview – Build 10041. Things might change completely in the future.

On Windows Phone Silverlight 8.0 it was possible to continue run an while the app wasn’t foregrounded. This was useful for Turn-by-turn or run-tracker type of apps. So even if you got a phone call or turned the screen off, the app would continue to run. Unfortunately that functionality was removed (well not removed, but rejected in certification) from Windows Phone Silverlight 8.1, and it was never added to Windows Runtime apps. That meant you were pretty much stuck on Silverlight 8.0 if you were building any of these apps.

However, in Windows 10 the functionality is finally here with the Windows Runtime! There’s not a lot of doc on it, and especially on phone it seems rather buggy, but I’ll try and explain the gist of it here.

First let’s create a new app, and add some basic location tracking to it.

When you run this app, you’ll start seeing coordinates getting added to the list about once every second.

Now if you were to minimize the app (if you run as a desktop app – not a phone app), and return to the app, you might notice that the app still got coordinates added while it was minimized. That’s probably because you had the debugger attached. Try running the app without Visual Studio debugging, and you’ll notice the app will completely pause when it’s minimized. That means the app will stop tracking you if it’s not active. So first lesson: The Visual Studio debugger lies to you and prevents the app from suspending.

If we want to continue running the app while another app is active (or on a phone get an unexpected phone call), we now have a new “Extended Execution” session that we can start.

private ExtendedExecutionSession session;

private async void StartLocationExtensionSession()

{

session = new ExtendedExecutionSession();

session.Description = "Location Tracker";

session.Reason = ExtendedExecutionReason.LocationTracking;

session.Revoked += ExtendedExecutionSession_Revoked;

var result = await session.RequestExtensionAsync();

if (result == ExtendedExecutionResult.Denied)

{

//TODO: handle denied

}

}

This tells the app that we’d like to continue even if the app is backgrounded. So you would usually call this API when you start running or doing your route.

Similarly we can stop the execution by disposing the session:

if (session != null)

{

session.Dispose();

session = null;

}

You would typically call this at the end of the run or when you reach your destination.

The only piece we’re missing is the Revoked event – I’m not entirely sure when this fires (there’s no documentation available yet), but on the Windows Phone emulator it fires the moment you leave the app, so I haven’t been able to get this working there.

Now add this to your app and call the StartLocationExtensionSession method and minimize your app. Wait a little and come back to it – note that points have been collected while the app wasn’t active. So now you can go write your run tracker app for Windows Desktop and take your desktop computer for a run… or wait for a Windows Phone 10 build where it’s working

Disclaimer: This article is written based on Windows 10 Tech Preview – Build 10041. Things might change completely in the future.

The Windows 10 Preview SDK was finally released, and we all finally get a peek at what the new Universal App Projects (UAP) are all about. It’s one binary that will run everywhere. This means that it’s also one XAML to run both on Windows and Windows Phone. But because the user experience is usually quite different you might want a different UI for it. So a new functionality was added to Visual State that allows you to easily change the layout based on the width of your window. So the idea is that the layout adapts not based on device, but by screen real-estate. Here’s what that could look like:

<Grid>

<VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>

<VisualStateGroup>

<VisualStatex:Name="narrow">

<VisualState.StateTriggers>

<AdaptiveTriggerMinWindowWidth="0"/>

</VisualState.StateTriggers>

<VisualState.Setters>

<SetterTarget="status.Text"Value="Narrow view"/>

</VisualState.Setters>

</VisualState>

<VisualStatex:Name="wide">

<VisualState.StateTriggers>

<AdaptiveTriggerMinWindowWidth="600"/>

</VisualState.StateTriggers>

<VisualState.Setters>

<SetterTarget="status.Text"Value="Wide view"/>

</VisualState.Setters>

</VisualState>

</VisualStateGroup>

</VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>

<TextBlockx:Name="status"FontSize="40"

HorizontalAlignment="Center"VerticalAlignment="Center"/>

</Grid>

So the basic idea is that by using the AdaptiveTrigger, when the window gets small enough, switch to the phone/narrow UI. So on a phone it’ll probably always be this UI used. Pretty neat, and allows for a similar experience across devices, but adapt for bigger screens.

When taking a closer look at the StateTriggers property, it takes a collection of ‘StateTrigger’, which is an abstract class that AdaptiveTrigger inherits from. So it stands to reason that perhaps we can create our own state triggers?

Supposed basing your UI on the width isn’t good enough, and you want to base it on the platform you’re on (Windows vs Windows Phone), we can create a new state trigger for this purpose. All we have to do is call the base method SetTriggerValue(bool) whether the conditions of the state is enabled or not. So here’s what a class like that would look like:

IsTypePresentStateTrigger: Enabled/disable UI based on whether a certain API is available. For instance if a hardware back button is present (usually Windows Phone), we can hide the back button from the UI, and free up some screen space.

Now the next question is: Does these values support binding? If they do, these triggers could be the new equivalent of WPF’s DataTriggers. So let’s create a simple data trigger that turns something on, based on a boolean. We can implement a simple IsTrueStateTrigger / IsFalseStateTrigger and just call the base method if the value we bound is true or not.

<VisualState>

<VisualState.StateTriggers>

<triggers:IsTrueStateTriggerValue="{Binding MyBoolean}"/>

</VisualState.StateTriggers>

<VisualState.Setters>

<SetterTarget="box.Visibility"Value="Collapsed"/>

</VisualState.Setters>

</VisualState>

Of course I could use a value converter for this as well, but this has a lot greater flexibility – a converter would have to be written to convert to Visible/Collapsed state, whereas this trigger can set any property to any value type.

Got any more ideas for useful generic state triggers? Fork and make a pull request!