Tuesday, 28 April 2015

Some more reactions have appeared on the sell-off of A4e. Of the mainstream media, only the Financial Times reports it. They say that Emma Harrison owned 87% of the company, whereas others say 85% and City AM says 85.5%. All agree that she gets £20m out of the deal. All the reports point out that Staffline already owns EOS and Avanta, and will now control a large chunk of the market; City AM says 23%. The FT says: "The 16 private sector suppliers of the government’s welfare-to-work programme have been engaged in a wave of consolidation as they seek to bolster their position ahead of the next round of contracts in March 2017". It also says that A4e employs 3,000 people, but the Yorkshire Post says the figure is 2,200. The newly enlarged company will hold 9 WP contracts, two more than Ingeus (which is now owned by an American company). No one seems to think this is a problem.The financial websites naturally focus on the money. Investor Interactive reports that Staffline's shares "shot up by 18%" on the announcement and is very chirpy about its future profitability. The Yorkshire Post looks wider. They do call Harrison an entrepreneur, which I have always maintained is untrue; and they quote the boss of Staffline on why the name A4e will not be retained, unlike that of Avanta. He says that the A4e brand is "unfortunately too tarnished". The paper also tries to get a comment from Emma Harrison herself; but when contacted all she would say was "I’m sure you’ve had all the press releases. Thanks for calling, bye." Charmingly, they add "It is thought that she will devote her time to charity work."

Monday, 27 April 2015

Yes, it's confirmed (and thanks to my correspondent for the early tip-off). A4e has been sold to Staffline Group for £34.5m. The story is here.
Staffline has acquired the entire issued share capital for £23.5m. That's almost £20m for Emma Harrison, who owned 85% of the shares. There are more complications, but that's basically it.
Staffline reckons A4e is a "profitable, cash generative business" and the acquisition is good for the company. Remember that all that cash is straight from the pockets of tax-payers.
A4e's staff have been told by email this morning about the deal. They now face waiting to hear about their future. Andrew Dutton and the entire group board will also be looking for work.

Wednesday, 22 April 2015

I've had a tip-off that A4e has been sold and the staff will be informed on Monday. Since I can't confirm that, I won't go into any more detail. If it's true it raises some interesting questions.

Last night on Newsnight there was supposed to be a debate about "welfare" with representatives from Labour and the Conservatives. Labour's Rachel Reeves and Stephen Timms were already on their way when they were told it had been cancelled - the Conservatives had pulled out. It seems that Mark Harper, minister for the disabled, had withdrawn with two hours notice. So, since we're now under election rules, the producers couldn't empty-chair him. Instead there was a "panel" on which Fraser Nelson spouted egregious Conservative tripe and Will Hutton talked sense. Also there was Deirdre Kelly ("White Dee"), because the media now treat her as some sort of representative of the unemployed. It was terrible. The Daily Politics has been holding a series of debates among party spokespeople on various areas of government, and on May 5th there's to be one on "welfare", including Iain Duncan Smith. The editor assures me, via Twitter, that IDS won't withdraw and, no, it isn't already recorded, it goes out live. We'll see.

Wednesday, 1 April 2015

Daily Mail readers apparently need pictures. So the paper's report on the sentencing in the A4e fraud case comes with lots of pictures, including two of Emma Harrison. But accuracy, not a quality conspicuous in the Mail at any time, has deserted it today. Harrison is called "David Cameron’s millionaire former jobs tsar". Er .... no. She was "family champion", which meant little. They do acknowledge this later, but it doesn't excuse the initial lazy mistake. Then, after an accurate account of the sentencing - they couldn't really get that wrong - there's a box entitled "How the Mail exposed fraud against taxpayers". "The scandal of the massive taxpayer fraud at A4e was exposed by the Daily Mail three years ago," they say. They do talk about the whistle-blowers, but the claim that it was the Mail which exposed the fraud is ludicrous. The whole story of Harrison's downfall is re-told.Let's not allow the Mail to re-write history. Yes, it was their story which brought the £8.6m payout to the attention of many more people than had read this blog, Private Eye, the Guardian or the Telegraph. The reports they ran for nearly a week were probably responsible for Harrison's humiliation. But the Mail didn't "expose" anything.