Hi guys, it took me a while but i put together all video footage I could find of unarmed black citizens being killed by police. Video is in
chronological order, with a description before each footage. There have been many of these incidents and I feel it is important for everyone to see
for themselves what really happened before they take a view on it. The question I'm asking is are the Police performing a public service like they
are supposed to or is there clear evidence of excessive force. WARNING - footage is often graphic. Anyway please share and let me know your thoughts.

I apreciate the time you put into the video but perhaps the title and premise should of been "All unarmed PEOPLE killed by police". This race baiting
has got to stop stastics show unarmed whites are killed at same rate as unarmed blacks. More whites are killed by police overall and that blacks
commit the majority stake of homicides and other violent crimes. And they commit the highest percentage of any race in rgards to gun based crime

This Cop hating Race baiting needs to STOP. This is exactly what the Government and MSM Want. Don't be the idiots who help them. The fact obama and
hilary met with BLM and the MSM supports them tells you what you need to know about supporting division in the HUMAN community. Even black people hate
BLM. Only those ignorant of its goals and origins support BLM.

Unarmed in the sense that none was holding a weapon in their hands and therefore did not pose an imminent threat. To the other poster, well I did not
say it okay for races other than blacks to be killed by police you did. I think the reason for only using the examples of black citizens being killed
by police would be self-evident given the current debate on excessive violence used on black citizens, BLM movement, protests around the country etc.

Actually funny you should mention that I should put my efforts towards doing work for a charity organisation, as I have created many presentations,
nearly all which I have done for free or a fraction of normal cost; which have been shown at numerous charity events and are still watched today
online. I won't go into the monies and help generated to those organisation as result.

originally posted by: Kamza
To the other poster, well I did not say it okay for races other than blacks to be killed by police you did. I think the reason for only using the
examples of black citizens being killed by police would be self-evident given the current debate on excessive violence used on black citizens, BLM
movement, protests around the country etc.

Sorry but you implied it. I would say that using videos of only black citizens would only further your agenda and does nothing for the real issue of
police violence on citizens. It always has to be a race issue and that's the problem.

It's not for me to say what I would or wouldn't do, at no point do I condone or criticize the actions of the police. Like I said this is just posted
here for everyone to see and be informed.

May I ask these questions? : What do You hope comes from showing this video? One would have to have been in a coma for the last 5 years + not to see
a divide, and if one is remotely attached to "Social Media" they've seen some videos and some edited videos of police involved shootings. When can We
expect to see a video chronicling the cops who've been shot?

If You were protected by armed guards, would You go into an inner-city and chronicle the murders that are committed by the same race e.g. White vs.
White; Asian vs. Asian; Hispanic vs. Hispanic. You could actually do a full 2 hour movie on just the Norteno vs. Sureno Hispanic gangs who kill each
other.

If someone is 'on edge' and watches the video and goes out and perpetrates a heinous crime and when captured, tells police that they watched Your
video and felt compelled to 'even the score'? Will there be a follow-up video?

Do You feel any responsibility for the content of Your film?

I also operate in a 'Free Will Zone' so look at the questions as rhetorical in nature if answering them makes You feel uncomfortable.

Did you even watch your own video? Do you know what the law is? Most of these perps had weapons, claimed they had weapons, or had weapons in which was
not known if real or not.

I watched the video and all I saw were cold blooded murders......what kind of smokescreen are you blowing here?

Police are paid to engage suspects non-lethally......if they dont want to do so then they should get different jobs,it is this simple.A gun is not a
1st line defense for Police Officer and it is being used s such.

Police must be held to task by full blown full on murder charges when suspects are killed in stone cold blood .

Yelling stop stop stop and then unloading your Glock into someones chest and finishing the clip when they ae laying aleady mortally wounded on the
ground is rarely seen in WAR.....these are MURDERS......verbal command disobedience is NOT EVER A REASON TO BE EXECUTED IN COLD BLOOD......refusing to
allow yourself to be unlawfully detained and manhandled DOES NOT GIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT THE RIGHT TO KILL YOU UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

If a Police officer cannot handle a suspect physiclly then they need to wait for back-up .....these are NOT ARMED BANK ROBBERS ON THE RUN......these
are people comitting acts of civil disobedience and being sumarily EXECUTED FOR DOING SO.

Why are there no non-lethal tools being made available...we know the Taser is Lethal weapon so those cannot be used......but why no sticky-webs or
some type of insta-hardening foam because like it or not we are WATCHING COLD BLOODED MURDERS ON THIS VIDEO and most could be prevented by using
non-lethal means ......EXCLUDING THE LETHAL TASERS.

It seems to me that this is all about the VERBAL COMMAND DISOBEDIENCE and law enforcement has developed a status quo where they can legally EXECUTE
YOU IN COLD BLOOD ON THE STREET for not obeying ANY VERBAL COMMAND which means the interpretation of wether or not you are obeying is left entirely up
to them which means they get to make the decision to use LETHAL FORCE to enforce a refusal to obey a verbal command in what is in the offices opinion
a non-compliant manner.This is boiling down to abuse of power by the police.....they define non-timely compliance s non-compliance.....they are
KILLING OUR CHILDREN FOR NOT LISTENING FAST ENOUGH...with no judges juries lawyers or protection involved.

This shoot to kill #e has to STOP NOW...it is only put in place to stop lawsuits where the police make mistakes....like the MAFIA THE CIVIL POLICE
DEPATMENTS ARE SNUFFING THEIR MISTAKES BEFORE THEY CAN GET TO COURT.......this is how it is......they should be shooting legs EVERY TIME.....unless
they are taking fire.....or have guns POINTED AT THEM AND NOT ONE SECOND SOONER......YES THIS IS HOW IS IS...FIND ANOTHER OCCUPATION if you think its
to much work.

It should make everyone vomit to see 6 cops on top od some guy who obviously isnt fighting back....yes resisting....but NOT FIGHTING BACK....then see
a cop who is OBESE and well over 250lbs walk over calmly then dop his body weight via his knee on the head of the prone suspect who already has 4-5
cops on top of him.These police DO NOT TRY TO DETAIN SUSPECTS THEY INTENTIONALLY MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THEY NEED HELP TO ESCALATE THE SITUATION QUICKER
WHICH BEGINS THE DANCE OF DEATH....once office one cant handle a suspect then officer 2 is green-lit to jump in then if 2 of them are unable to detain
and cuff the suspect another 1 o 2 officers jump in ESCALATING THINGS FURTHER AND CLOSER TO MURDER BY COP.....then if someone pulls a weapon and
unloads it in the suspect murdering him no one will have much of a chance of seeing exactly what happened with all the cops in the pile.....the police
have responded to cameras and online coverage by intentionally playing broken-wing and then calling fo excessive backup then PILING ON AND BLOCKING
OUT VIDEO COVERAGE WITH BODIES BEFORE THEY EXERT THEIR KILLER PRESSURES....they simply use more cop bodies to cover their actions from the video and
they use group prescence[thin blue line pressure] to make arguing the story impossible.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.