This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Sorry, but this has to be an act, no professor of chem/physic can be this dense. Provide your source for the 2/3 requirement in the House for passage of a law?

As for Hurricane Sandy, please provide me with your explanation as to why those items were in the bill and why Republicans were demonized for not supporting it? Like all liberals you buy the headlines and never read the story.

You are asking me to provide you with the details on the 2/3 house requirement........but I have "never" read the story?

And just to emphasize your avoidance, you want "100%" coverage by the fed.....while you still hold that states should be doing this work?

I think you should fully explain that before you start requiring me to educate you on the House vote.

PS....when did I EVER say I was a Prof?

Last edited by Gimmesometruth; 08-20-13 at 06:32 PM.

Originally Posted by trouble13

If you wanna know why Trumpsters are ignoring you its for the same reason you ignored the KKKs complaints about Obama.

Actually, according to your logic, the Dems poulled a pretty good Repub by forcing so many Dem earmarks into the sandy bill. Were any of those earmarks for your team?

Originally Posted by Conservative

Sorry, but this has to be an act,

Regarding Hurricane Sandy, please provide me with your explanation as to why those items were in the bill and why Republicans were demonized for not supporting it? Like all liberals you buy the headlines and never read the story.

You are asking me to provide you with the details on the 2/3 house requirement........but I have "never" read the story?

And just to emphasize your avoidance, you want "100%" coverage by the fed.....while you still hold that states should be doing this work?

I think you should fully explain that before you start requiring me to educate you on the House vote.

PS....when did I EVER say I was a Prof?

I want a liberal to explain why headlines all over the country like the following demonized the Republicans who didn't vote for the Hurricane Sandy bill. I posted what was in that bill so the question is why wasn't those who voted for the bill demonized and held accountable for the pork?

Democrats, majority, did not have complete control from 07-11, as the blanket statement you made.

Complete control means Speaker of the House, Senate Majority Leader, control of all the Committees , and what bills get to the floor for votes. What did Democrats propose that the Republicans even could stop during that period of time in the House?

I want a liberal to explain why headlines all over the country like the following demonized the Republicans who didn't vote for the Hurricane Sandy bill. I posted what was in that bill so the question is why wasn't those who voted for the bill demonized and held accountable for the pork?

How long have you lived under the impression that you don't have to play by anyone's rules AND you believe everyone has to play by yours? If you are going to keep on avoiding explaining your own contradictions, forget about having your demands answered.

Homie don't play that.

And AGAIN I ask.....where did you get the idea that I am a Prof?

Originally Posted by trouble13

If you wanna know why Trumpsters are ignoring you its for the same reason you ignored the KKKs complaints about Obama.

How long have you lived under the impression that you don't have to play by anyone's rules AND you believe everyone has to play by yours? If you are going to keep on avoiding explaining your own contradictions, forget about having your demands answered.