Human facial beauty

Abstract

It is hypothesized that human faces judged to be attractive by people possess two features—averageness and symmetry—that promoted adaptive mate selection in human evolutionary history by way of production of offspring with parasite resistance. Facial composites made by combining individual faces are judged to be attractive, and more attractive than the majority of individual faces. The composites possess both symmetry and averageness of features. Facial averageness may reflect high individual protein heterozygosity and thus an array of proteins to which parasites must adapt. Heterozygosity may be an important defense of long-lived hosts against parasites when it occurs in portions of the genome that do not code for the essential features of complex adaptations. In this case heterozygosity can create a hostile microenvironment for parasites without disrupting adaptation. Facial bilateral symmetry is hypothesized to affect positive beauty judgments because symmetry is a certification of overall phenotypic quality and developmental health, which may be importantly influenced by parasites. Certain secondary sexual traits are influenced by testosterone, a hormone that reduces immunocompetence. Symmetry and size of the secondary sexual traits of the face (e.g., cheek bones) are expected to correlate positively and advertise immunocompetence honestly and therefore to affect positive beauty judgments. Facial attractiveness is predicted to correlate with attractive, nonfacial secondary sexual traits; other predictions from the view that parasite-driven selection led to the evolution of psychological adaptations of human beauty perception are discussed. The view that human physical attractiveness and judgments about human physical attractiveness evolved in the context of parasite-driven selection leads to the hypothesis that both adults and children have a species-typical adaptation to the problem of identifying and favoring healthy individuals and avoiding parasite-susceptible individuals. It is proposed that this adaptation guides human decisions about nepotism and reciprocity in relation to physical attractiveness.

Key words

Randy Thornhill is a professor of biology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. His research interests include insect behavioral ecology, human sexual behavior and psychology, characterizing the process of sexual selection, and the study of adaptation and methodology in evolutionary biology in general. Recently, he has focused research on the beauty of human bodily form and the role of fluctuating asymmetry in sexual selection.

Steven W. Gangestad is an associate professor of psychology at the University of New Mexico. His recent research includes work focused on sexual selection in humans and its implications for general relationship phenomena. His other recent research concerns the impact of developmental instability on functional asymmetries, interpersonal orientations, and individual differences in the control of emotional expression.

Cunningham, M. R. 1986 Measuring the Physical in Physical Attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the Sociobiology of Female Facial Beauty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:925–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feingold, A. 1990 Gender Differences in Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Romantic Attraction: A Comparison across Five Research Paradigms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:981–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1993 Inbreeding in Egypt and in This Book. InThe Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. N. W. Thornhill, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

1992b Patterns of Fluctuating Asymmetry in Weapons: Evidence for Reliable Signalling of Quality in Beetle Horns and Bird Spurs.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 248:199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauer, K. P., R. Thornhill, and S. Fleck In press On the Genetic Relationships between a Zahavian Handicap of Fathers and Offspring Quality in a Scorpionfly.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.Google Scholar

Sigall, H., and D. Landy 1973 Radiating Beauty: The Effects of Having a Physically Attractive Partner on Person Perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28:218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singh, D. In press Adaptive Significance of Female Physical Attractiveness: Role of Waist-to-hip Ratio (WHR).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar

Slade, R. W. 1992 Limited MHC Polymorphism in the Southern Elephant Seal: Implications for MHC Evolution and Marine Mammal Population Biology.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 249:163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, M., E. D. Tanke, and E. Berscheid 1977 Social Behavior and Interpersonal Perception: On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35:656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar