The gulf port city of Houston, TX, the fourth largest city in the United States, has already seen three snowfalls so far this year, something that has only happened once in recorded history, in 1973. And considering that February is still to come, which is historically the month most likely to bring snow to the area, local Houston news station, KHOU, is warning of a record-breaking fourth snowfall.

“That would be a first in Houston’s recorded history, dating back to the late 1800s — and it’s possible early next month. Certainly, if you go far enough back in geologic time you could find a year when it’s happened in this spot on the planet, but it’s absolutely unheard of from the perspective of people actually living here.” [Source]

Such bizarre weather as this in Houston follows the unbelievable flooding and devastation brought to the area last summer when Hurricane Harvey dumped biblical amounts rain on the region, causing unprecedented catastrophic flooding.

So, the question is, if such dramatic changes in climate are indeed anthropogenic, then are we talking about the secondary effects of human impact, or are we talking about a direct influence on the weather, such as geoengineering?

Just a few short years ago a supposition such as geoengineering would have instantly invoked the catch-all thought-stopping label ‘conspiracy theory,’ but today we find that more and more mainstream news outlets are open to the idea of weather modification. It actually seems almost as if they’ve been directed to discuss this ‘conspiracy theory’ whenever possible in order to normalize the idea of tampering with the environment, supposedly in order to save ourselves from ourselves.

“Tweaking the global thermostat is going to require a lot of control, and nobody really knows how much will be too much.” [Wired]

In the case of Houston, a reporter did exactly that, informing the public that geoengineering projects were in our future and will be impacting Houston weather in coming years.

“Overwhelming scientific consensus concludes that human-caused climate change is very real, but of course when you’re in the middle of a cold winter, the idea of warmer days can be appealing!

To artificially cool the planet, pilots would inject sulfur dioxide (SO2) high into the stratosphere, blocking solar radiation — exactly like a large volcano eruption would do — effectively reducing the amount of total sunshine absorbed by our planet and resulting in a measurable cool down. In 1991, when Mt. Pinatubo exploded, global temps dropped nearly 1°F, making for a cooler summer and colder winter. Some climate scientists say using this method of geoengineering is a viable way to, “undo” the warming damage done by our greenhouse gas producing carbon-based industry and transportation.” [Source]

The mindbender here, though, is the fact that mainstream outlets are now suggesting that once geongineering kicks off, it will be too dangerous to stop it, for the effects of the reversal would be totally devastating.

What?

USA Today recently pitched this idea to its readers, who are undoubtedly of mainstream thought and weary of considering the volumes of information already published on this issue by independent journalists and alternative news.

To counteract global warming, humans may someday consider spraying sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere to form clouds — and artificially cool the Earth.

The idea behind the process, known as geoengineering, is to keep global warming under control — with the ideal solution still being a reduction in the emissions of greenhouse gases.

However, suddenly stopping that spraying would have a “devastating” global impact on animals and plants, potentially even leading to extinction, according to the first study on the potential biological impacts of climate intervention.

“Rapid warming after stopping geoengineering would be a huge threat to the natural environment and biodiversity,” said study co-author Alan Robock of Rutgers University. “If geoengineering ever stopped abruptly, it would be devastating, so you would have to be sure that it could be stopped gradually, and it is easy to think of scenarios that would prevent that.” [Source]

Video: Federal scientists call for research in controversial geoengineering

They are talking about atmospheric spraying, or chemtrails, another so-called ‘conspiracy theory.’

What’s most interesting in the above video, though, is emotional impact of the presentation, the conclusion, and the assumptions made along the way. Accompanying the voiceover are video clips of terrible smog and pollution and over-crowded urban regions, while suggesting there is already a consensus on the need for geoengineering, then concluding that Trump is somehow already to blame for preventing us from saving the planet with chemtrail spraying.

“What if, what if, what if. My point is simply we don’t know. While it can be argued that human emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases since the Industrial Revolution have effectively acted to already geoengineer our climate — to be warmer — can attempting to undo the damage do more harm than good? What about crops and animals that have already adapted to a warmer planet? Would sending them back to a climate resembling the icier times of the turn of the century (when the Thames River in London froze) be a benefit?

“Later, they found out the reason for the rough skies. Immediately after they had seeded it, the hurricane, made a dramatic dogleg turn. Inscribing a huge 7 over the Atlantic Ocean, it turned westward and plowed back to the mainland. It was battering Savannah with eighty-to-one-hundred-mile-an-hour winds when they flew over.” ~Ginger Strand

“Is there equipment such as this on the ground in the oil facilities and other infrastructure components of the oil and gas industry in the area of Houston? If so, could they have been strategically employed to refuel Harvey, something which would have required deliberate planning and coordination?” [Source]

Geoengineering is total madness. It’s the human God-Complex reaching up into the heavens to take control. If you want to improve life on earth and stop the processes which are most damaging to our planet, then break the grip of the fossil fuels industry and allow the full exploration and marketization of new energy technologies.

While this outcome is unlikely in such a criminally controlled environment as we have today, it appears the powers-that-be will be officially rolling out geoengineering soon. Even if they already admit that it is a one way street with no return, and abandoning course along the way would cause mass extinctions. Total madness.

About the Author: Terence Newton is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com, interested primarily with issues related to science, the human mind, and human consciousness.

The insecticide Naled kills mosquitoes. It also wipes out honey bees, now undergoing a mass die-off attributed to its use. And it is toxic to humans, particularly newborns. It will now be sprayed on 6 million Texas acres as part of the U.S. government’s Harvey recovery plan.

The following article by Whitney Webb was originally published at Mint Press News.

Amid statewide efforts to clean up the aftermath left by the historic flooding caused by Hurricane Harvey, the Pentagon announced last week that it had dispatched C-130H Sprayers from the Air Force Reserve’s 910th Airlift Wing in order to “assist with recovery efforts in eastern Texas.”

However, these “recovery efforts” have little to do with rebuilding damaged structures or with the resettlement of evacuees. Instead, they are set to spray chemicals in order to help “control pest insect populations,” which they allege pose a “health risk to rescue workers and residents of Houston.”

The Pentagon has requested that the planes treat more than 6 million acres throughout the Houston area. The Air Force noted that the current effort is “expected to significantly surpass previous [spraying] missions in scope,” specifically the spraying campaigns that followed Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Naled’s Toxicity Not Confined to Mosquitoes

While the Pentagon has framed its efforts to “assist” as seeking to eliminate a potential human health risk, the particular chemical it is using to control insect populations is likely to do more harm than good. According to the Air Force, the mosquito control protocol involves spraying the “Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved and regulated material, Naled,” which the Air Force insists will not be used in amounts large enough to “cause any concern for human health.”

Yet, the most concerning consequence Naled poses for human health is the chemical’s ability to cross the placental barrier—meaning that Naled freely crosses from mother to fetus. A study conducted at the University of Oslo found that Naled’s breakdown product, dichlorvos, caused a 15 percent decrease in the brain size of newborn guinea pigs when their mothers were exposed to Naled for only three days during pregnancy. Doctors from Puerto Rico have also claimed that Naled harms fetuses.

Studies in the U.S. have also shown that pregnant women exposed to Naled had a 60 percent higher chance of having a child with an autism-spectrum disorder.

This is especially troubling given that the manufacturer of Naled, Sumimoto Chemical Corp., is also the manufacturer of the mosquito larvicide SumiLarv, a chemical now believed to have been the real culprit behind the spike in birth defects in Brazil originally attributed to the Zika virus.

At the height of the Zika scare, a group of Argentine doctors, Médicos de Pueblos Fumigados, published a report citing a pesticide used to kill mosquito larva as the real cause of the birth defects. According to the report, the area where most of the affected Brazilian families live, Pernambuco, had its drinking water treated for 18 months with a chemical larvicide that produces fatal birth defects in mosquitoes.

Pernambuco subsequently reported more than 4,000 cases of microcephaly in 2015. In contrast, in Colombia, public health officials diagnosed more than 17,000 pregnant women with Zika last year, yet only 18 cases of Zika-associated microcephaly were reported—less than 0.2 percent of the total.

In addition, the Air Force’s characterization of Naled as an “EPA approved and regulated material” omits the important fact that the EPA is currently re-evaluating the chemical for safety.

Agrochem Corp Pressures to Keep Naled on the Market

However, political pressure could keep it on the market. Such pressure was manifest in last year’s “Zika Vector Control Act,” which passed the House but failed in the Senate and narrowly missed becoming law. If it had been passed, the act would have exempted mosquito-control operations from environmental regulations and would have kept Naled on the market regardless of the EPA’s decision. It also would have ended monitoring of and limits to pesticide use.

Though the act ultimately failed to become law, there will likely be another effort at preventing the chemical from being banned by the EPA. It is currently “one of the most widely used pesticides in the United States for aerial mosquito control” and has been applied to “about 16 million acres per year in the continental United States.”

Given its wide use, the chemical’s manufacturer and its strategic partner Monsanto will likely want to keep such a profitable product on the market, lest they face a mass drop in sales and revenue.

Julie Telgenhoff| Why did it take Megachurch Millionaire Joel Osteen how many days to finally open his Megachurch, Lakewood, up to stranded and dying humans caught up in the hurricane in Houston, Texas?

I received some really negative comments from some uninformed people about the following article I posted regarding this situation and the fact that other Americans were coming together and helping one another, unlike Osteen and his Megachurch.

Osteen finally caved to which I then updated the above article ….HOWEVER he then went on a massive advertising campaign about how he is opening his Megachurch to the hurricane victims and that is when the comments of negativity really started pouring in. So these people posting these hateful comments did not due their research and obviously got caught up in that propaganda, especially considering that SATANIC HOLLYWOOD’S TMZ was pimping the lie about Osteen’s Mega Million Dollar Church being flooded and that was a BIG FAT LIE (SEE BELOW VIDEO FOR MORE PROOF).

Primary Sidebar

About A Sheep No More

A Sheep No More is no longer plugged into the Matrix like the many sheep who are still programmed to believe that they have correct information provided by a varied and “independent media.” In fact the media is owned by 5 or 6 mega-media companies run by corporate advertising executives and Washington.