Y U NO JS ACTIVATED? JAVASCRIPT DISABLEDWe get it. We often have problems with Javascript ourselves. We also congratulate you on your choice to view the Web safely by turning off scripting. However, to view, navigate, and use this site properly, you must enable Javascript. Otherwise, your experience here will be lacking. (Gets down from soap box.)

Home/ Who has more economic savvy? Alan Greenspan, Paul Krugman, or Ron Paul?

In response to S&P's recent downgrade of the US government, Greenspan recently asserted that "The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default."

OMFG! Do you realize what he just suggested?

Perhaps a little history and background are in order...

Between 1921 and 1923, the Weimar Republic (the German republic established after World War I that Hitler's Third Reich eventually took over) had what's called hyperinflation. Hyperinflation is price inflation (as opposed to monetary inflation) that is "out of control." It occurs when a government prints "too much" money and circulates it in the economy. Printing money causes a vicious circle where you have to print more money (e.g., QE1, QE2, QE3?). Sounding familiar yet?

Price inflation is bad because it reduces the purchasing power of your savings so you aren't able to buy as much. In other words, your standard of living goes down. And it's not like you can just increase everyone's income in the economy and avoid the negative consequences of price inflation. For example, if you had $100 in the bank and the price of gas goes up from $2.00 per gallon to $4.00 per gallon, you can now only buy 25 gallons of gas (about one tank) instead of the 50 (two tanks) you could buy before the inflation. Sounding familiar yet?

As the Weimar Republic destruction proves, economic collapses can lead to serious geopolitical complications. There are some that suggest World War III might not be such a far-fetched idea to serious people. Considering how much money the Federal Reserve has already added to the economy, why aren't we seeing hyperinflation like in Germany and Zimbabwe? There's an argument that claims markets don't care anymore. However, the real explanation is more likely that the banks aren't lending all of the money.

Ron Paul has been attacking the Fed, Alan Greenspan, and Paul Krugman for years over just this kind of ideology. (And he has been so dead-on accurate on his other predictions.) Kind of makes you wonder: who would make a better Fed Chairman - Alan Greenspan, Paul Krugman, or Ron Paul? What would Paul Krugman do if he was Fed Chairman? If you were head of the Fed, what would you do? Does it seem ridiculous for US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to judge, on the one hand, that S&P showed "terrible judgment" and, on the other, that European governments need to get their "fiscal house in order?" (You really can't make this stuff up.) Do you think it's a credible argument that the rating agencies wait too long to downgrade creditworthiness? Do you think the US will experience hyperinflation? Do you agree with Greenspan that the US was doing "relatively well" until Italy showed signs of weakness? Do you agree with Michael Moore that Obama should arrest the head of S&P? Is having to print money effectively a default? Is another recession, or even depression, imminent? Do you think the Fed should do a QE3? Are you doing any preparation for a dollar collapse? How concerned are you about all this?

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan on Sunday ruled out the chance of a US default following S&P's decision to downgrade America's credit rating.

"The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default" said Greenspan on NBC's Meet the Press

"What I think the S&P thing did was to hit a nerve that there's something basically bad going on, and it's hit the self-esteem of the United States, the psyche" said Greenspan..

'The United States was actually doing relatively well, sluggish but going forward until Italy ran into trouble," he said.

We all admire beauty, but the mind ultimately must be stimulated for maximum arousal. Longevity in relationships cannot occur without a meeting of the minds. And that is what Braincrave is: a dating venue where minds meet. Learn about the thoughts of your potential match on deeper topics... topics that spawn your own insights around what you think, the choices you make, and the actions you take.

We are a community of men and women who seek beauty and stimulation through our minds. We find ideas, education, and self-improvement sexy. We think intelligence is hot. But Braincrave is more than brains and I.Q. alone. We are curious. We have common sense. We value and offer wisdom. We experiment. We have great imaginations. We devour literacy. We are intellectually honest. We support and encourage each other to be better.

The Braincrave.com discussion group on Second Life was a twice-daily intellectual group discussions typically held at 12:00 PM SLT (PST) and 7:00 PM SLT. The discussions took place in Second Life group chat but are no longer formally scheduled or managed. The daily articles were used to encourage the discussions.