It might at first seem a far-fetched parallel, as both used the same Pagannini Caprice as a daparture point for sets of variations. Brahms did the same, as well as Liszt (though he actually recast the work as an Etude), but neither can connect to Rachmaninov.

Of course we all know (or if we do not, we ought to! ) Rachmaninov's Rhapsody on a Theme by Pagannini, which he wrote in 1934, and a very enjoyable work it is too. The Lutoslawski I have known for many years in its 1941 original version for two pianos (written to be played together with the composer Sir Andrew Panufnik), which is good in its way, though a bit bangy here and there. What I did not know is that Lutoslawski transcribed it in the '70s for piano and orchestra and I happened to hear this version the other day and all the bangs made sense and all "modernity" vanished.

Besides the obvious fact the theme is the same, I could not help feeling the Lutoslwaski could well have been an extra set of variations by Rachmaninov.

Considering Poland was cut off from the civilised world in 1939, meaning there were only five years between which Rachmaninov's work could travel, I would say it very improbable that one was aware of the other's work.

Has anyone else noticed this?

_________________Richard Willmer"Please do not shoot the pianistHe is doing his best."Oscar Wilde: Impressions of America: Leadville

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum