Add your own rating

Only items marked with (*) are averaged
into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

*Temperament

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)

*Scholarship

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)

*Industriousness

(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)

*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)

*Punctuality

(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)

*General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters

(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)

*General Ability as a Trial Judge

(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)

Flexibility In Scheduling

(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation

(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)

General Inclination Regarding Bail

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

Involvement in Plea Discussions

(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)

General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage

(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage

(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage

(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation

(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)

Involvement in Settlement Discussions

(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)

General Inclination

(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

What others have said about
Hon. Paul F. Harris, Jr.

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD6172
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A discredit to the bench and the community. Not a legal scholar and demonstrates consistent favoritism for his preferred attorney and provided legal cover in return for doing so. ;-)

Other

Comment #: MD6126
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Honoring principles of justice, due process, reason, and the facts of EACH and EVERY case should be standard. We place trust in Judicial Officials to exercise discretion through competence, integrity and impartiality.

When a Judicial Officer boldly voices and displays nothing more than discriminatory, unlawful, biased and unscrupulous conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, he then should face negative consequences for this conduct.

Other

Comment #: MD6093
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Consistently rules with favoritism using a post hoc mentality. Often gravitates and focuses more towards an arranged end result instead of rule of law & procedure. Rather than concluding resolution wrought by impartial reviewing of facts, evidence and law, an orchestrated effort to not honor civil procedure as directed by law reveals perpetrated injustice. These abhorrent actions provide the public an appearance of impropriety. Judicial Officers such as this make it impossible for the public and legal arena to retain confidence and faith in the system when certain cases are predetermined.

Favoritism, malfeasance, and dishonor is not what we expect of the Judiciary. Rather, impartiality and required adherence to the written rule of law should be standard application.

Other

Comment #: MD6006
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Very improper, unlawful, and unreasonable judge. Refuses to review relevant evidence and draws decisions from preconceived beliefs absent legal basis. Does not honor binding precedent and rewards female litigants who use children as weapons in domestic cases. In fact, and on the basis of his quoted statements in a recent transcript, he demonstrates his willful aiding and abetting in severe parental alienation. Any litigant (gender neutral) or Officer of the Court who willfully uses children as weapons in legal disputes should be criminally charged. Concurrently, once a judicial officer assists in this behavior, he has dishonored the bench by showing bias and lack of impartiality.

Civil Litigation - Private

Other

Comment #: MD5932
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Involved with a recent trail with Judge Harris and saw unprofessional, biased, and inappropriate judgmental behavior. He sustained and objected to testimony without any logical reason. The judge appeared to have formed an opinion prior to the case or testimony presented.

Other

Comment #: MD5928
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge exceeds the bounds of discretion, ignores legal precedent, and completely disregards his jurisdictional limits during trials. When brought to his attention, he knowingly presses forward regardless committing additional errors of law. Paints a false picture of fact in cases creating a record impossible for reversal on appeal.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD5866
Rating:2.0
Comments:
I do family law. He is SO misogynistic and pro-male it is unbelievable. He is a complete bully, insecure and not very smart -- a BAD combo. He should not be on the bench.

Other

Other

Comment #: MD5738
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Nailed it with "compromised ethics". Compromised as an attorney and judge. Improper, callous, heartless, and disobedient to law. Word of advice, do not attempt to correct his erroneous misapplication of clear statutes aligned with unconstitutional decisions. Only do so if wishing for a long standing grudge in future cases. Should have retired yesterday.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD5713
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge grants and denies motions without providing any legal rationale. Sides with his favorite attorney who he favored before being appointed. Believes unfounded allegations with no supportive facts or evidence. Sides with (proven) fraud instead and treats the falsely accused as if already a criminal without any facts on record as basis. Professional mentoring might be proper in this case. Thought judges were to preside objectively. Certainly not the case with this judge if he has predetermined your case. Appearing before this judge, I find he truly symbolizes systemic conflict in civil cases. Best of luck.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD5701
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This is the laziest SOB I've ever had the misfortune of encountering. I spent hours working on a Motion which he didn't want to read. It was too long. It's very frustrating when we work hard for the client and judge won't lift a finger to try and understand the case. He doesn't need to retire. He's been retired ever since he was appointed.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: MD5617
Rating:10.0
Comments:
This judge is SO fair! This is the judge for truth and fair trials! If your lying, good luck. Anyone who's says otherwise obviously has holes in their story or has lied and purged themselves. This judge is very smart and can decipher the truth!!! I have witnessed this on more than one occasion with him in different circumstances. He knows his stuff

Other

Comment #: MD5361
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Pleased to read Judge Harris is fair in some cases. Unfortunately, and based on personal courtroom experience, Judge Harris has been, and continues to preside unfairly. Confirmatory actions leading to facts on record cannot be disputed.

Concurred, that "reprimand" renders fair. Or at the very least, condemnation or denunciation for a pattern of misconduct resulting in lack of adherence in law may be appropriate. As well, very disappointing as his conduct in some cases emanates an improper ethics shift deficient of legal basis.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD5340
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Extremely biased. Appears to have made up his mind before hearing the facts. Will go back on nay statements or promises made in chambers. I have zero faith in his skills as a judge.

Other

Comment #: MD5302
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The gravity of concern is having zero regard as an impartial component of justice. He allows the continuance of legally unjustified cases without authority to do so. He's far more focused in asserting his power than administering effective justice. Some of his decisions, one case in particular, provides a stark example he knowingly harms both the public and those before him. [Redacted by Ed.] He rejects rules of evidence procedures and due process rights. [Redacted]
Brazenly contemptuous and rude, he radiates an imbalance in specific cases obvious to us who know why and with clear and convincing evidence to prove as much. He insults and pressures parties to settle while spinning the facts of a case to suit his purpose protecting the unscrupulous and guilty party.

According to the record, he appears to relish in denying solid motions for his disfavored side, while granting baseless and unlawfully drafted motions for his favored party. Not to mention he proudly voices inappropriate and ill-tempered comments. [Redacted by Ed.]

Other

Comment #: MD5301
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Harris unjustly denies credible motions filed weighted with sound evidence and credible reasoning. In proceedings, he denies signing these motions though his signature in docketed entries prove otherwise. He also misconstrues and misleads the court with false interpretations of relevant statutes. Is it me, or has this judge lost his mind? Concerned, as Jurisprudence seems absent.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: MD5281
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very condescending towards attorneys and litigants. Projects bullying tactics against disfavored side. Unprofessional conduct regarding his creation of law to suit his end result favoring attorneys from one local law firm. Numerous bias barriers. Undeniably, there is no excuse for this behavior behind the bench. Though my case resulted in a partial victory, this is not a judge deserving of judicial office.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD5120
Rating:1.0
Comments:
§ "This judge has mastered a precise skill. That skill would be deception. Innumerable injustices will surface if he has prejudged your case. Beware and good luck."

Other

Comment #: MD5091
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Suffice to say and by way of consistent conclusion, the "Culture of Silence" as shared earlier by another is relevant and darkest under this court. The masterful manipulation of indistinguishable facts molded into unclear and ambiguous findings for a preferred outcome are apparent. Protecting the guilty in the clear face of irrefutable evidence and case law is troublesome but common modus operandi.

Ratings: Not at all evenhanded. Involvement in settlement discussions reveals bias to drive and intimidate one party to settlement absent of fair and impartial discussion. General Inclination= Pro Plaintiff and Counselor. A negative rating in temperament and scholarship. Very poor involvement in pre-trial matters and ability as Trial judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD5081
Rating:1.0
Comments:
At his core, unfair, prejudice, and an exactitude of all that is contrary to law. A very apparent and consistent (negative) equation with the invovlement of one firm. Deplorable.

Other

Other

Comment #: MD5019
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This is an individual in need of serious resetting of ethics and values. He exudes zero merit and unequal treatment in what should be a fair decorum. His wolf in sheep's clothing disguises an enormous wrong paralleled with an accomplice for an unjust but favored outcome. He parades by with an insincere smile and nod voicing a condescending "hello" in the courthouse halls receiving no response or acknowledgement from those who can see right through the veil of his deceit. Exceedingly shameful with an aura of dishonorable presence.

Other

Comment #: MD5007
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Very biased‚ untruthful‚ and non-credible. Bases a decision after hearing false testimony from one side only before a competent court. This is after he admits knowing nothing about the case assigned to him. Should not be allowed to determined decisions in any area of law. Non compliance with rules‚ procedure and evidence are patterned with this judge. Confirmatory conduct proves why it always depends on the judge in this court rather than law.

Other

Comment #: MD5003
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Lacks merit‚ arrogant‚ condescending‚ biased and not a decorated scholar of law by any means. Skilled narcissism shines brightly. He compromises judicial integrity with dishonest and partial decisions. Procedural law is nonexistent in cases he willfully prejudges. In fact‚ sound circumstantial evidence by way of conduct alone reveals ex parte communication for a preferred outcome. Unethical‚ ineffective‚ unqualified‚ and knowingly violates legal principles.

A surfeit of transcript information and continuing case involvement affirms as much. Personal benefits appear to outrun merits in select cases under his authority. Withholding this conduct is not his forte‚ instead‚ he boldly creates a record knowing judicial accountability for his incorrigible actions will go untouched. Repeatedly observing these judicial failings under a wide spectrum of dimensions‚ surfaces doubt in the minds of many. Word of advice‚ remove and file elsewhere if this judge is assigned. Not worth his salt.

Other

Comment #: MD4960
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Some of his rulings are capricious and meritless. It's obvious he doesn't prepare for hearings and admits his lack of knowledge on case background at the commencement of certain hearings. Stubborness in refusing to listen when counsel speaks and proceeds forward without oral arguments from both sides. Interrupts cross for disfavored side while allowing full allotted time without interruption for favored side during questioning of witnesses. Ignores valid motions filed unless filed by favored counsel and client. Those motions recieve immediate favored rulings while others remain without. Clear absence of independent and neutral position. Manipulates case background from factual standing to fiction to serve a specific agenda. Fraud and deceit are easily allowed under this authority if a certain counselor is involved. The cover ups are deep, vast and beyond evident the lengths some will travel to protect improper and unlawful conduct.

Other

Comment #: MD4950
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Truly ...there is no other way to convey this adequately and honestly but to state he embodies all that is unethical behind the bench. He's aware the evidence exists but will continue concealing his unlawful atrocities upon innocent citizens. His failings past and present will come full circle.

Other

Comment #: MD4945
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Classic textbook case of ruling based on mood v. merit. On record for consistently favoring the Brown firm when cases are brought forth without legal basis. Responsible for encouraging parent alienation in his own oratory instead of discouraging PA and presiding impartially.

Other

Comment #: MD4918
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Refuses to weigh in evidence from both sides. Pre determines cases and the worst judicial temperament. Perhaps a lesson in how an honorable judiciary operates by observing Judge Hackner might be in order.

Other

There exists far more fitting descriptions. Such as those describing the unscrupulous conduct coupled with widely neglected legal applications. As such, this neglect establishes a littered trail of unequal treatment in the obvious select cases. These actions reveal nothing more than irreparable harm and the furtherance of weakening the democratic process. Disregarding irrefutable simple clear law and origin of Constitutional text is disgraceful and unfaithful to the administration of justice.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD4882
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Ever since being elected to the bench, Judge Harris has acted nothing short of a tyrant. He is nothing but a bully and has forced clerks and courthouse staff to act accordingly when dealing with even simple requests.

Other

Other

Comment #: MD4869
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Agreed, this site should allow for a zero rating involving all General Rating Criteria and Civil Rating Criteria. Unable to speak for Criminal Rating Criteria other than his egregious conduct mirrors that of criminal.

Other

Comment #: MD4853
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Standard conduct. He rationalizes his own immoral behavior without shame. He's been this way for decades, get used to it as those residing near him know all too well. The rating on this site should allow for a zero.

Other

Comment #: MD4850
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Prejudges cases, conducts his own investigation in contract law cases, refuses to adhere to basic applicable Maryland Statutes and the list is infinite. Admonishes and projects blame on litigants and attorneys after errors of law (by him) are brought to his attention. What ensues is this judge progressing forward, repeating the same errors during proceedings committing judicial misconduct after those errors are brought to his attention. He is also so arrogant by voicing during proceedings that he has an excellent record in the Appellate courts regardless.

Seems to be more interested in protecting certain attorneys in a local firm than honoring clear settled law or the very oath he was sworn in to uphold.

Other

Comment #: MD4820
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Would the connection between 'judge and lawyer' involve managerial land development by lawyer in another state? Perhaps this may provide weighted suspicion for "personally beneficial purposes" as mentioned previously.

Other

Comment #: MD4788
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Harris is extremely full of himself. Other Judges on this bench seem to cater to him and I'm not sure why. Maybe they are also afraid of his vindictiveness because he has shown it over and over again. Anyone that challenges or disagrees with him is punished by him in legal proceedings. He can't retire soon enough. I hope and pray he never comes back as a visiting Judge. He needs to visit retirement and for good.

Other

Comment #: MD4785
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Harris has no business being on the bench He is horrible and he has upset many a party before him. He is totally incompetent and in love with himself and his blow up ego. He started off as a good Judge and he has now reverted to his blown up ego. Perhaps dementia is setting in.

Other

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD4647
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A majority of judicial officers rule according to the applicable rules and precedents void of any external influences. This judge however is not a part of that majority. The personal future beneficial gains for this judge by a certain lead partner in a local firm extends beyond evident.

In this case, and referencing only this -judge and lawyer- their fitness for practicing and presiding fails miserably.

Civil Litigation - Private

Other

Comment #: MD4607
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unable to speak for all cases but irrefutable evidence along with a court transcript will easily confirm MD4599 to be untrue in a specific case.

Maintaining impartiality and fairness is expected in all cases, not just a select few. A proper decorum is critical. The transcript referenced above will confirm that this judge allowed two specific attorneys and their client (males and females) to "put children" in the midst of a case.

In the midst of a case where the children should have remained uninvolved but disturbingly, encouraged to testify by opposing counsel and client against an innocent parent without legal basis.

Conduct allowed by this Judge in which he ruled in favor of the parent who frivolously involved children. The evidence stands firm in this case that this judge supported the use of children to be used as weapons. Additionally, most judges frown upon the frivolous use of children in divorce cases.

Again, he may be fair in some cases, but be intelligent enough to educate yourself on the totality of all cases he presides before declaring an uninformed comment.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD4599
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Judge Harris is one of the best judges, if not the best, in Anne Arundel County. He is always fair, but he does not like it when people, male or female, put children in the midst of divorce cases.

Other

Comment #: MD4352
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He is not the "Best" nor is he the "Worst." Rather, he is the weakest link, yet the most protected.

“In the American judicial system, few more serious threats to individual liberty can be imagined than a corrupt judge. Clothed with the power of the state and authorized to pass judgment on the most basic aspects of everyday life, a judge can deprive citizens of liberty and property in complete disregard of the Constitution. The injuries inflicted may be severe and enduring. Yet the recent expansion of a judge-made exception to the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1871, chief vehicle for redress of civil rights violations, has rendered state judges immune from suit even for the most bizarre, corrupt, or abusive of judicial acts.’ In the last decade this “doctrine of judicial immunity” has led to a disturbing series of legal precedents that effectively deny citizens any redress for injuries, embarrassment, and unjust imprisonment caused by errant judges.” (RC Waters)

The above quote could not be more relevant to this judge. Primarily, "complete disregard of the Constitution"

Litigant

Other

Comment #: MD4270
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Interesting comments over the past few months here. Honestly, a high percentage would be accurate. The primary gravity of concern is his improper and unlawful decisions. Adversarial parties enter the courtroom expecting a fair and impartial bench. Etiquette, and proper authority should be applied and obeyed. Adhering to rules of law commands public respect. When improper authority and disrespect for rules of law are violated, images of professionalism, dignity, and impartiality are quashed in the publics' mind. From my observations thus far, his lack of etiquette, anti-professionalism, and unlawful rulings undermine the dignity and honor for certain proceedings. If officers of the court as well as the bench choose to demonstrate disrespect for litigants, attorneys, judiciary, and the system, then expect the public to return the same in a boomerang fashion. Procedural fairness should be standard across the board. Regarding this judge, he chooses to operate unfairly depending on his personal view regardless of law and irrefutable evidence. He chooses to predetermine cases as evident in his own words and actions. If overall fairness was the case in the judicial process with respect, then we would see the administration of justice operate in a different light. It is elementary, in that, if Harris would simply abide by the rules of law and procedures in the most basic clear cut cases, both parties to the case would benefit from a fair and impartial tribunal and outcome. If you choose to pick and choose which cases you feel to be impartial based on your mood, then you have failed in the position you were sworn in to uphold.

As in any elementary virtue, if you want respect Sir...... then show respect!

Other

Comment #: MD4195
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Undeniable treasonous abuse of authority. Quite a skilled psychopath at heart as evident in his shameful oratory. His recent activity in a particular case has been confirmed by well respected attorneys as nothing short of criminal activity and egregious judicial misconduct.

Other

Comment #: MD4029
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The operative phrase below, "repeatedly and consistently fails to uphold those very fundamental core values....." renders appropriateness in referencing judge Harris. He continues on a crusade of committing legal errors after those errors / mistakes have been brought to his attention. Brought to his attention more than a few times. Therein lies the indisputable fact that he not only commits legal errors, but judicial misconduct as well. A scholarly mind is not necessary in comprehending the above.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD4026
Rating:1.3
Comments:
With over 2 decades litigating here in Maryland, I would respectfully submit that Judge Harris, though maintaining the appearances of judicial even-handedness, fairness and equity, repeatedly and consistently fails to uphold those very fundamental core values that we, as Officers of the Court, and the general public, not only require but should demand. In a word, he is biased, and in several words, pre determines cases not in the interests of judicial economy or equity, but for some unknown and likely personally beneficial purposes.

Other

Comment #: MD4007
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Of concern here is the lack of respect and compliance with the law. Maintaining professional competence is a requirement while remaining true and faithful to the law. It is now officially on record that a litigant was denied their right to be heard according to law. While errors of law may not constitute misconduct, willful legal errors of law should raise the necessity for disciplinary action where legal errors transformed into judicial misconduct. When legal principles are clear, irrefutable evidence is presented, and with attorneys and clients on record confirming certain statutes are applicable and deemed necessary, a judge should respectfully and appropriately review. When a judge believes his authority towards clients and their attorneys can be used to coerce and drive a case into a preferred but (unfair) outcome, the unbridled question in disregarding requirements of law and constitutional rights of citizens should elevate a beaming red flag. Thus, when a judge rules improperly and unfairly in the clear face of evidence and applicable law, [his] judicial authority becomes unacceptable.

Other

Comment #: MD3997
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The long standing record and memorialized words from this judge speaks soundly. All judges shall be fair and impartial in any given case regardless of a personal bias they may have against litigants and their attorneys. He is anything but fair and impartial in select cases as the documented record in court filings reflects. Unfortunate, but true.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD3987
Rating:9.6
Comments:
The comments on here are unfair. Judge Harris is one of the few on the bench who is straightforward as to his opinions and cuts through the diplomacy to be honest to the litigants about their case and their behavior. Unfortunately for him, this leads to people going onto this website and giving him unfavorable reviews simply because they didn't want to hear what it is he is saying. I have had him come down hard on both my male and female clients. Quite frankly, most of the time my client deserved it.

Other

Comment #: MD3955
Rating:1.0
Comments:
"intellectual dishonesty" as stated previously here nails it precisely when describing this judge. He deliberately misrepresents the material facts on which a case centers. The facts in determining applicable law. When this occurs, one has no hope in winning a strong case if one faces a judge with this mindset. A mindset of altering those facts so the applicable law no longer applies in a given case. I've entered the court many times only to experience this conduct which results in an unfair and improper outcome for litigants.

Other

Comment #: MD3951
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Issues orders inconsistent with facts in evidence, case law, and paints a false veneer of judicial impartiality. In truth, the omission and mischaracterization of facts for a preferred outcome is abundant in some of his cases. Clear errors confirming misconduct. Evident he favors the Hillman firm. Heavy bias and gender slant. Exceeding abhorrent misconduct in trial court. Fundamentals of Maryland law are disregarded. Clear and evident that a judicial disciplinary mechanism should be conducted. A very consistent thread of rendering decisions without reasoning or factual findings.

Other

Comment #: MD3940
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Simply put, he is without merit or ethics. Disregards clear and controlling law. Condescending statements towards litigants and attorneys. A superb representative of intellectual dishonesty. And that is just the beginning. Painly speaking, an embarrassment to the legal forum. No attorney or litigant should have to endure this judge's willful & projected disrespect for the law behind the bench. As a well respected law professor once stated, "always respect the bench, but be aware of those operating behind who may have forgotten why they were sworn in to begin with."

Other

Comment #: MD3922
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Predictable conduct and rulings each and every time. His own memorialized words and signature(s) on every order (that he has denied in open court proceedings exist in the documented record) further cements absence of impartial outcomes.

By all means, continue with this moronic trail of unlawful conduct as it results in beneficial present and future press releases from those interested in airing.

This is a very dangerous game being played by this individual and those colluding with. The more it continues with documented evidence, the more critical intervention is needed. Violating the Constitutional rights of citizens is a serious matter, and not to be ignored.

Don't take our word for it, conduct your own investigative research and be present as a court watcher for various hearings. From this, draw your own conclusions based on informed decisions from the factual background in recent cases involving court filings, transcript and audio cd formats available in administrative case records.

Undeniably, there is a serious problem with specific members of the judiciary in this circuit court. A problem needing immediate attention.

Quite unfortunate as there are respected and honorable members of the judiciary in our jurisdiction who should not be subjected to this conduct either.

Other

Comment #: MD3872
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In my professional opinion and after observation, clearly this judge should not be operating or determining in the best interest of mothers, fathers or children. He also struggles in comprehending complex legal principles of law and the necessity in applying such law in his cases. As a result, improper and unlawful rulings surface. Most definitely should not preside over contract or custody cases.

Other

Comment #: MD3854
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Arising from curiosity, and with the ever increasing and consistent comments on this page, has anyone forwarded a formal complaint to the Judicial Commission on matters discussed here? Might be a consideration.

Litigant

Comment #: MD3853
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Made up his mind before entering the court room. Attacked all of my witnesses and implied that I lied on a medical assistance application for my child. Clearly should not be making any decisions about best interest for any children!

Litigant

Comment #: MD3839
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Does anyone know why the last two posts were removed? Valuable and factual information was provided in those comments about Samuel J. Brown and Judge Harris. Would this have anything to do with the fact Brown wants to quash any and all information regarding his conduct as to not lose a future seat as candidate for House Delegate? Countless Anne Arundel County citizens are enraged at this news along with a few local counselors. Quite clear why favoritism for the Brown firm from Harris exists as the record for multiple cases will confirm. We would very much appreciate the original poster of those comments to repost if possible.

Other

Comment #: MD3828
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Keep a close watch on hearings where Attorney Marietta (Tippy) Warren is involved. Judge Harris by conduct alone and rulings confirms his remarkable favoritism for Warren and her clients regardless of evidence confirming her clients bad faith, direct lying to the tribunal and baseless litigation. But then again, this attorney is also a member of the Hillman, Brown and Darrow firm, so the above goes without saying.

Other

Comment #: MD3816
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Harris is the epitome of shame. The audacity yet again to gloat and broadcast that you have an exceptional record with the Appellate court when you continue disrespecting the very opinions from the Appellate court. Either you suffer from a mental condition, consciously choose to ignore, or are proud of gross negligence. May I suggest you revert back to case law review, Blacks Law Dictionary, and reading the motions filed before each case instead of having the law recited to you? Only to have required law in multiple cases quashed like a fly swatter. Do the citizens a favor and remove yourself from the bench or start practicing. You are not worth your salt and by far, a detrimental component to the Anne Arundel Circuit Court panel.

Other

Comment #: MD3796
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Paul F. Harris Jr. is synonymous with all that is prejudicial. He further cements the reason our public policy continues to spiral in the legal forum. Harris could not have been more correct in his speech years ago in front of more than two hundred present when he publicly announced that he knew members in the audience were unhappy with him being elected as judge in our jurisdiction. It stood true then, and stands true today. His general ability to handle pre trial matters and as a trial judge from a scale of 1-10? Answer> -10. A pure shame I am required to walk the same halls as Harris.

Other

Comment #: MD3785
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Annapolis Maryland is fortunate to have some of the most well respected, fair, ethical, and cerebral judges, primarily at the Appellate level. Unfortunately, Judge Harris is not, in any way among this group. As a student and observer of oral arguments in COSA, the Maryland Court of Appeals and the Anne Arundel Circuit Court, it befuddles me to witness the polar opposite in conduct from Harris and the Appeals court judiciary. A common theme in observing Harris is his unwillingness to apply applicable law when recited to him by seasoned attorneys. Interestingly, Harris stated in one hearing I observed, "I have a good record in the Appellate court". Perhaps this is true, but the question remains, why would a judge feel it necessary to state this more than once? Judge Harris from my observations thus far is operating as the antithesis of the Appellate Judiciary. A relief to know that higher courts are in existence.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD3735
Rating:9.3
Comments:
Judge Harris is an excellent Judge who knows his topics and the law very well. Anyone who states he is incompetent obviously does not like the outcome and is nothing more than vindictive and unfair to the totality of any case. Judge Harris is competent, intelligent and very knowledgeable about the law. Just because you don't like the outcome doesn't mean you can attack his character. Judge Harris is simply doing his job.

Litigant

Comment #: MD3084
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
It is my personal opinion that this jude is prejudice against mothers and women in general. He shows serious favoritism to specific lawyers and is down right rude.

Other

Comment #: MD2757
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Reasonable and justifiable resources have come forward demanding an investigation commence into the machinations / collusion amongst the Anne Arundel Circuit Court Judges. This in conjunction with a local Annapolis firm. Referencing the very limited positive comments here regarding the conduct of this particular Judge, any reasonable observer, litigant, court staff, criminal defense lawyer, prosecutor, first year law student, & reporter, present as a court watcher during any proceedings this judge presides, would swiftly ascertain his complete disregard for applicable law and evidence before the court. Historical record extracts and civil case records for numerous cases will confirm this thematic occurrence. With presence in the trial court, researching inactive / closed, final judgements and pending cases, the clear and evident judicial and attorney unethical behavior is evident. The favoritism for a particular Annapolis Counselor, associates in his firm, and clients, is beyond compelling and worthy of investigation. - JW

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD2362
Rating:10.0
Comments:
As a female attorney representing g a female in a protective order case I must say this Judge was very kind and compassionate. It was a erasure to be before him. My client was emotional on the stand and he verbally recognized how difficult the situation was for her to come into court. I was so pleased with this judge and his ability to consider what is best for the child. This judge does not like parents, male or female, to play games with children. It was a pleasure going before this judge

Other

Comment #: MD2355
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In observing Judge Paul Harris in trial court, primarily for Family Law Cases, his conduct from the beginning resonates embarrassment to the citizens in Anne Arundel County. Recently, he argued a case without allowing the Defendant's testimony. A case that was to be dismissed when trial commenced. He forced the Defendant to settle with prejudice and exercised extreme favoritism toward Opposing Counsel, Samuel J. Brown. J. Harris demonstrates a consistent theme of favoring the Hillman, Brown, & Darrow firm, but primarily Sam Brown. J. Harris is also on record for not applying MD statutes & illustrates by brazen comments that he won't follow the law if presented with the law by Counsel during trial. Further, facing the unpredictability of a Judge's behavior of not allowing opening arguments to be heard, interrupting cross examination and not allowing the full scope of cross for various Counsels, except Samuel J. Brown. Over the years, enough case information has been collected confirming J. Harris's favoritism toward Sam Brown as well as extending that favoritism toward the Brown firm. This doesn't even scratch the surface of the corruption that looms our citizens in the Circuit Court of Anne Arundel County. Both Harris & Brown have proven that the law is not viewed or applied in which it was intended. That under J. Harris's control, case law, credible evidence, and testimony is not allowed in various cases. That further, Harris & Brown may "barely" observe the law, but play fast and loose with the law while violating its spirit with the greatest of ease. Ladies and Gentlemen, there is a reason that Sam Brown is one of the wealthiest Attorney's in Annapolis, MD, but not generated from honesty or ethical conduct. Instead, Brown and Harris continue their quest of destroying Women, Men, Children, and extended family members via use of abusing the law as set forth. That their continuous operating in bad faith, unethical tactics, and misconduct will be exposed. The continuous machinations, backdoor maneuvers and absence of fairness for both parties in the trial court under the thumb of J. Harris will be known. This is for the protection of innocent citizens and ethical Counsels having to face the corruption under Judge Harris. J. Harris is also on record for not preparing beforehand in cases assigned and entering into delicate cases that conclude poorly under his rulings. It is time to hold J. Harris and Sam Brown accountable for their ongoing bad faith & misconduct. Various individuals have come forward expressing their preparations for a class action lawsuit and strategy to bring this injustice to an end and we thank you for your courageous efforts in contacting us in this quest.

Litigant

Comment #: MD2331
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is extremely abusive, narcissistic, and biased -- his mind was made up before the emergency child protective trial even began. He put the child back in the abusive household. The mother was threatened to be killed (along with everyone in the home) by her ex, who hid in the trunk of her car to get to her. She filed a restraining order for herself, not for her child. Judge Harris stated at the end of the trial that, if this had come into his courtroom in the beginning, he would have returned the child to the mother -- thereby putting her back in a situation that could have gotten her killed. He did not care if she lived or died! This man should be disbarred!

Litigant

Comment #: MD2299
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He is unfair and biased and a real bad judge, but then again, it's Anne Arundel County, so who cares?
This is the guy that was quoted as saying: "maybe she wanted to get beat up," and then the defendant got no more than a slap on the wrist.

Other

Comment #: MD2098
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A very biased judge. Every family lawyer in Annapolis will tell you. If you're male, he will rule in your favor. More than one decision of his has been overturned in front of a three-judge panel. Just this morning he heard a contempt case and protective order (for a 7-year-old child) case (forwarded from District Court) in which he would not hear any evidence. The person (male) which he ruled for has been indicated of neglect by DSS and he would not even read the report. This judge rules based on his mood, not the facts of the case.

Litigant

Comment #: MD1880
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Had his mind made up before the case was put on. Announced his decision before the proceedings began. Stated his brilliance in dealing with children and his ability to accurately tell if a child is telling the truth when he speaks to them in chambers.Rolled his eyes when advised of a males long term abuse emoting that mattered not in a custody situation.It's a wonder that he was able to get in a law school; a greater wonder that he graduated!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1847
Rating:2.4
Comments:
Strong male bias, no way around it. His record against women speaks for itslef. He clearly has an axe to grind and appears to be trying to correct the perceived wrongs he suffered durrig his career as an atorney. Does not appear to have a strong knowledge of law and would rather legislate from the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: MD1770
Rating:8.3
Comments:
Despite dealing with a very hostile mother whose own family and children demonstrated that she was verbally and mentally abusive towards her children and hostile towards all the positive adults in their lives. It's disgruntled litigants that are the cause of all the negative comments about Judge Harris. I was a witness in a case recently before Judge Harris and found him to be tough but fair. I think he even stopped a few times to give opposing counsel to decide whether or not they were going to object and they chose not too and he even questioned why.

Other

Comment #: MD1769
Rating:7.0
Comments:
I spent a lot of time reviewing a case recently and was impressed with the equality he gave both the defendant and the plaintiff a lot of opportunities. It's a sad situation when a mother tries to throw her teenage sons under the bus and make up lies. Judge Harris found her to not be credible and saw through her lies. I believe she lost her case all by herself. It's people like this that give the judge's bad reviews because they are incapable of seeing their own wrong doing. The funny thing is she would have lost a lot less had she settled out of court. I thought that the judge gave the mother way to much opportunity to slander and purposely say things to tarnish her son's reputation as well as the witnesses in the case.

The point is this, you take a chance by allowing yourself to wind up in court rather then learning how to play with the toys in the sandbox with others and co parent. A parent who chooses to leave their marriage and doesn't think of anyone other then themselves and doesn't think of implications of their actions on the children are the same ones that would be trashing the judge.

Other

Comment #: MD1688
Rating:1.0
Comments:
It is my opinion that Judge Harris does not have the best interest for the children when it comes to custody cases. If a child is old enough to testify then that child should be able to testify. He didn't get all the facts. He gave a child who has anxiety when she is with her father to her father. This is not my child I am talking about nor a family members. It is just something that I had the misfortune of seeing first hand. He is definitely bias and pro male. He really needs to think more about what he is doing to the children.

Litigant

Other

Comment #: MD1574
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Harris is the most biased judge on the bench in Anne Arundel County. He formulates his opinion prior to hearing any testimony, In a child custody case in which Judge Harris is hearing the case, It is highly recommend that the children have a lawyer represent them independantly. Judge Harris sways towards MEN and does not take the best interest of the child into consideration. If you are unlucky enough to have your case heard by Judge Harris, run to the court house and demand to have Harris removed from hearing your case. Judge Harris should be removed from the bench.

Other

Comment #: MD1435
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Paul Harris is a prime example of the ignorance of the Maryland electorate as are Martin O'Malley, Mike Bush, and Mike Miller. Maryland voters will get from the system what they put into it. Lately that hasn't been much.

Other

Comment #: MD1235
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Biased misogynist. Had the nerve to tell a child at a custody hearing that she was a little liar and that she would do well in the acting profession. What kind of person tells that to a little girl, more or less a judge?

Court Staff

Comment #: MD1147
Rating:8.0
Comments:
There will always be an angry party after a trial before Judge Harris. THE LOSER? Judge Harris deserves a better description than what has been posted. First, he was elected by the people of Anne Arundel County! Judge Harris is completely free of any corruption and wasn’t appointed by a corrupted judicial appointing system. Prior to the bench, Judge Harris was in practice for 30+ years as a trial attorney. While in practice, Judge Harris was primarily a criminal defense attorney, yet, he has the reputation for being tough on crime. Clearly he had the best interest of his clients while in practice, and now his interest is devoted to public safety. However, Judge Harris sticks to the rule of law and ensures that criminal defendants receive a fair trial. All of the Court employees enjoy working with Judge Harris (keep in mind most clerks are female). Judge Harris treats everyone with respect and shows the little guy a fair shake. Not once have I seen Judge Harris speak down to anyone or treat them differently because they are from a specific area of the county. Furthermore, Judge Harris has presided over several weddings for employees of the Court, all on his free time. In contested divorce/custody cases Judge Harris doesn’t walk onto the bench with a preconceived notion the wife should receive custody. Judge Harris will determine all the factors set forth by law and the issues raised by counsel. He doesn’t want to hear, “...but, Johnny doesn’t want to go with his father/mother...Johnny is scared of his father/mother...” Judge Harris would respond with, “Johnny is six. Johnny doesn’t know what he wants or what is best for him.” Judge Harris is famous for making comments from the bench. These comments, however, are within the scope of the case at hand. Judge Harris doesn’t randomly make personal comments to reflect his views, rather he is responding to the cases before him. Unlike most Anne Arundel County Judges, Harris requires proper etiquette. For example, always stand when addressing the Court, never wear a bow tie, turn off your cell phone, no gum, no shorts, and show the opposing party proper courtroom respect. Judge Harris is married with three sons. One of his boys is currently serving our country overseas with special forces and has been deployed five times to date. To say Judge Harris is “corrupt, bias, misogynistic, and dishonest” is completely inaccurate to say the least. All hot air from heated litigants that lost their case. Judge Harris pledges his allegiance to the country, county, and citizens on a daily basis. Please, see for yourself!

Other

Comment #: MD1122
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Harris is so bias. He is pro male. He makes inappropriate remarks. He doesn't read any of the motions or research. He does not look out for the children best interests. Judge Harris says bias remarks. I feel the Judicial Disability committee needs to look in to this. He is a disgrace.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1120
Rating:7.8
Comments:
Since many commentators have suggested this judge has a strong gender bias I will start by saying I am a female attorney and do not get any negative bias at all appearing before Judge Harris.

His conduct towards counsel (both male and female) seems generally appropriate and evenhanded, though he will express his ire with counsel disrespect or game playing and once a witness or counsel has lost credibility they will have a hard time gaining it back. I don't see that as a negative though perhaps a certain type of litigant / attorney would feel constrained by this judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD1063
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unfortunately,Judge Paul Harris lacks all of the characteristics of a good Judge.He is lazy and normally has his mind made up as to who should win before the first witness is called.He does not prepare,he does not read Motions os look at the research in any memo attached to a Motion.He clearly is pro Male in any custody or other divorce case regardless of the facts.I am surprised the Judicial Disabilities have not on their own picked up on his weaknesses,of which there are many,and failed to charge himSo much for the Judges Judging themselves.Pity and a travesty especially for the children involved who he leaves unprotected.

Litigant

Comment #: MD957
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Anne Arundel County Circuit Judge Paul Harris, in a decision that has victims' rights advocates crying foul, acquitted the man charged with second-degree assault after he was accused of striking his girlfriend three times in the face. The judge said that without the woman's testimony, he could not be sure that she hadn't consented to the attack. Unfortunately for rape and domestic violence victims nationwide, this judge is not an anomaly. And his conduct throughout--the wildly inappropriate comments, the specific directions to the jury that they must prove "the defendant's actions were not consented to by the victim"--strongly suggest a few disturbing notions. That Judge Harris is a deeply misogynistic creature, for one. That Judge Harris is behaving, and ruling, unethically and even unconstitutionally, for two and three.

Litigant

Comment #: MD954
Rating:1.0
Comments:
intellectual idiot!!! He thinks he is sitting on the Arch of the Covenant, flash.. it is just a chair. He leaves a mentally retarded person in the guardianship of an abuser and surrounds her with crack heads and abusers. All the while trying to make loving sister believe she has no rights to protect the mentally retarded. Also allows court appointed attorney to wipe out tens of thousands of dollars stolen from inheritance for the mentally retarded person.Report on abuse told of months of only getting PBJ, ear grew to her head, 1set of underware filthy, not allowed to shower,brush teeth any of basic needs. Body filthy, she was given 5x the amount of Phenabarb and xanax just to keep her quiet. Yet this moron judge put her right back into their guardianship. While I was not allowed to give her the love she deserves and have no criminal record. HE HAS NO SHAME BECAUSE HE IS WITHOUT A CONSCIENCE OR SOUL!!!!!!!!!

Litigant

Comment #: MD870
Rating:1.0
Comments:
If your looking to protect an elderly father from a conning daughter who has elected to sacrifice the original family for her selfish goals and you seek the Anne Arundel County Court system to help, pray that you don't get Paul F. Harris as the judge deciding the outcome. Paul Harris truly does ignore evidence, fails to see his Order get completed and dismissed our case without evidence being presented. He obviously didn't read the Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian or the Memorandum in Opposition submitted by us. He sided with the conning daughter whose behavior is astounding, unethical, and immoral to other family members. It's a shame that they use the word Honorable before a judges name. All we have been asking for since the conning daughter began taking advantage of our father is for our side to get heard. Paul Harris denied us of that by dismissing the case on 1 March for apparently no reason. We are still waiting to hear why since we have yet to see the order dismissing the case. So like I said, if your looking to protect an elderly father from a conning daughter don't do it in Anne Arundel County. You may get Paul F. Harris.

Litigant

Comment #: MD845
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
He is the worse judge ever. He makes up his mind before the trial start. He does not look at any evidence especially evidence that is complicated. He favors men and puts children in harms way. He does not care about best interest of the child. He is definitely anti-gay. He has said that a child should have a male and a female parent. He helps the mens side of the cases and interjects his personal opinions during testimony. he should not be on the bench and he leaves room for numerous appeals and the harm that he does to children can not be repaired.

Other

Comment #: MD843
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge DOES NOT have any concern for children! He even stated in a recent case that it doesn't matter how the child feels! This judge did not take into consideration anything the childs councelor said. He wasn't looking out for the best interests of the children. This judge favors men. Yes, I said it. He did not look into any of the prior abuse records, he did not allow anyone to check on the living conditions, he did not allow supervised visitation even though the father has a well documented history of abuse that goes back almost 15 years AND that the child said he wanted (remember it doesn't matter what the child wants) someone there when visiting (umm, maybe so he could feel safe!?). The backing and the evidence that is so missing for Commentor MD821 is that his lawyer said that the agreement the mother was proposing is reasonable and that she wouldn't even try the case UNLESS she got Harris as the judge. If something happens to this child, or any other that the "Hon" Paul F. Harris put back into an abusive situation he will have their blood on his hands.

Other

Comment #: MD821
Rating:9.0
Comments:
No judge deserves a 10...no one is perfect. However, this judge is humanly fair. The negative comments by some reviewers can't be taken seriously, they protest too much, simple words without backing or evidence. One complained of bias towards Glen Burnie lawyers while another complained of bias towards Annapolis firms. Tells me the opposite, Judge Harris lacks bias.
Judge Harris' concern for children is impressive, he goes above and beyond for their well being. Parents, don't use your children to get back at your spouse in Harris' courtroom.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD760
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Lazy,mean and always ill prepared is a bad combination, which makes for a very bad judge. The only good thing is that he leaves everyday at 2 o'clock. That way he's not screwing up cases in the afternoon as well. Overall, a total disaster.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Other

Comment #: MD692
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Harris is an embarrasment to the bench. He is biased and makes up his mind before the trial and ignores the evidence presented. it is not a suprise alot of his cases are appealed and reveresed. Harris has no business being apart of Maryland's judicial system. When his term is up I only hope he will face the same fate as some of the victims he has victimized. For anyone to say he is fair, grab a book on Maryland Law and do some research. The man is a joke and should never have been put on the bench. This is coming froma party that won on appeal of one of Harris' cases.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD546
Rating:9.6
Comments:
Very fair in evaluating all evidence and all angles of case. Very respectful of parties and counsel while not tolerating bad behavior from either. I have won and lost my share in front of him but always came out feeling like everyone had an equal opportunity.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD403
Rating:1.9
Comments:
More suited to District Court where he gets to be the Judge and the one who ultimately decide "who wins" Unable to accept his role as a trial judge and repeatedly interjects personal opinion and bias throughout trials. Agree: unable to understand matters that are factually or legally complex and doesn't care enough to try.

Other

Comment #: MD392
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Judge Harris is fair and reasonable. He saw throught the smoke and mirrors. Judge Harris shared his opinion in both parties and saw who the favorable parent was. I am pleased with verdict. He did not show bias toward my female attorney.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD343
Rating:9.8
Comments:
Judge Harris is fair and reasonable. He has not lost sight of what it is like to practice law. I have never had a bad experience when before him (yes, I have lost my share of cases). Judge Harris does not show bias towards anyone or any law firm, he is all about doing what is right and following the law.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: MD336
Rating:8.6
Comments:
I have seen the comments of others, and I could not disagree with them more. I have had favorable and unfavorable decisions from this judge, but never thought that the other side was getting the upper hand. (And, no, I do not work with Sam Brown.)

Other

Comment #: MD181
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He apparently makes his mind up prior to the case being presented. Favors certain law offices in Annapolis, most of all Sam Brown's. Dismisses testimony whenever it suits him. Believes he is godlike and untouchable. How did he ever become a judge?