More likely, he did not "have guns" he was in his office and may not have even had a CCW, IF there was anything there firearms wise, it was likely in a safe awaiting use in a production.

It's incredibly unlikely that he didn't have a gun on him, as he was a gun enthusiast. More likely he was caught by surprise, in which case a gun isn't going to help you.

Id put money on this being some anti- gun liberal that did it.

So your theory is that somebody who opposes guns bought—or illegally acquired—a firearm and used it to kill someone simply because of their enthusiasm for firearms? That's pretty contradictory. It would be like a vegetarian protesting a meat advocate by disembowelling a cow in front of their home. Surely an "anti-gun liberal" would use a knife or poison? You know, anything other than a gun.

Hmm something smells fishy.

Obviously. He was murdered. Unless you're suggesting it's part of a massive government conspiracy to restrict American's right to bear arms, which wouldn't surprise me given the other ridiculous stuff you post.

As for the victim, if he was murdered for his enthusiasm for firearms then that's very sad and concerning. Many people might consider his enthusiasm to be unhealthy and abhorrent but that's certainly no reason to kill somebody. I would suspect he was murdered for another reason - possibly money. If the YouTube channel was generating a lot of money - which you'd have to assume it was given its popularity - then that's a very strong motive for killing somebody, especially if there was a dispute over how it was to be shared. It would be very scary to think that gun owners and advocates of gun restrictions were turning against each other to the point that they're willing to kill each other, though given the toxic political climate in the US that's certainly a possibility.

Oh my god I love FPSRussia. Just because they are gun nuts, doesn't mean they deserve to be murdered. My sympathies to the Person who was murdered's family and the FPSRussia team. I hope it wasn't some filming accident turned murder.

I don't think anyone suggested that he did deserve to be murdered. I also doubt he was murdered because he liked guns.

Obviously. He was murdered. Unless you're suggesting it's part of a massive government conspiracy to restrict American's right to bear arms, which wouldn't surprise me given the other ridiculous stuff you post.

As for the victim, if he was murdered for his enthusiasm for firearms then that's very sad and concerning. Many people might consider his enthusiasm to be unhealthy and abhorrent but that's certainly no reason to kill somebody. I would suspect he was murdered for another reason - possibly money. If the YouTube channel was generating a lot of money - which you'd have to assume it was given its popularity - then that's a very strong motive for killing somebody, especially if there was a dispute over how it was to be shared. It would be very scary to think that gun owners and advocates of gun restrictions were turning against each other to the point that they're willing to kill each other, though given the toxic political climate in the US that's certainly a possibility.

I'd go the money angle. Seems the most likely. Or a girl. People do crazy stuff over the ladies.

i don't know why you guys keep sayin silly crap like that. isn't even remotely the same thing.cars werent designed to kill for one.

"For one?" What else you got?And it is, as a matter of fact, the same damn thing. Blaming an intimate object for the actionsa person uses it for is ignorant. But if you want to blame an object for what it COULD beused for, how about knives? They were designed to cut and stab. The fact that they're alsoused to do it to dead meat should be irrelevant by your logic- their PURPOSE is put to usekilling people, thus we should register every single one and limit how many a person canown... maybe even take them away completely.

"For one?" What else you got?And it is, as a matter of fact, the same damn thing. Blaming an intimate object for the actionsa person uses it for is ignorant. But if you want to blame an object for what it COULD beused for, how about knives? They were designed to cut and stab. The fact that they're alsoused to do it to dead meat should be irrelevant by your logic- their PURPOSE is put to usekilling people, thus we should register every single one and limit how many a person canown... maybe even take them away completely.

with enough bullets and a gun one could also make ground meat from meat, but i doubt that's their original purpose. Also don't know about you, but in my country some knifes are in deed forbidden to sale unless in a gun armor.

"For one?" What else you got?And it is, as a matter of fact, the same damn thing. Blaming an intimate object for the actionsa person uses it for is ignorant. But if you want to blame an object for what it COULD beused for, how about knives? They were designed to cut and stab. The fact that they're alsoused to do it to dead meat should be irrelevant by your logic- their PURPOSE is put to usekilling people, thus we should register every single one and limit how many a person canown... maybe even take them away completely.

same ol' argument.. would you be ok with people packing anthrax around? mustard gas? portable nukes in briefcases to work? they are inanimate so it should be safe right?