Visitor Counter

Visitors Since Blog Created in March 2010

Click Below to:

Add Blog to Favorites

Coyotes-Wolves-Cougars.blogspot.com

Grizzly bears, black bears, wolves, coyotes, cougars/ mountain lions,bobcats, wolverines, lynx, foxes, fishers and martens are the suite of carnivores that originally inhabited North America after the Pleistocene extinctions.
This site invites research, commentary, point/counterpoint on that suite of native animals (predator and prey) that inhabited The Americas circa 1500-at the initial point of European exploration and subsequent colonization.
Landscape ecology, journal accounts of explorers and frontiersmen, genetic evaluations of museum animals, peer reviewed 20th and 21st century research on various aspects of our "Wild America" as well as subjective commentary from expert and layman alike. All of the above being revealed and discussed with the underlying goal of one day seeing our Continent rewilded.....Where big enough swaths of open space exist with connective corridors to other large forest, meadow, mountain, valley, prairie, desert and chaparral wildlands.....Thereby enabling all of our historic fauna, including man, to live in a sustainable and healthy environment. - Blogger Rick

Coyote plan pulls the wool over our eyes

By Heather Bolint, bangordailynews.com

Read the following statements found on the Maine.gov website and it is easy to believe that Maine is putting the health of our natural ecosystems in jeopardy:

"By continuing the coyote control program, the public may perceive the Department [of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife] implicitly believes the control program has a strong biological basis, when in fact, the biological benefits of coyote control are unknown." (This implies that the biological harm is also unknown).

As well as this statement: "It is not known whether the current snaring program, or other forms of coyote control, has any effect on increasing local or regional deer numbers."

And this: "The possibility exists that the removal of territorial coyotes may allow nonterritorial coyotes into an area, and exacerbate the deer predation problem."

All of these statements were issued by IF&;W in its 2001 report "Feasibility Statements for Eastern Coyote Goals and Objectives." This is the latest information available on the coyote control program in Maine and, according to the IF&W staff member who wrote this report, is still relevant today. Which means no further research has been conducted or analyzed.

Coyote control in Maine is facilitated through shooting, trapping, baiting and running down coyotes with dogs. These can be inhumane methods and are not regulated, as no permit is required for general hunting of coyotes and hunters are not required to tag any coyotes they kill.

It is open season on coyotes year-round in Maine, which means that people hiking through the woods with their dogs are at risk any time of the year, not just during deer hunting season. This past fall there were four different cases of domestic dogs being shot and killed near their homes throughout Maine, mistaken by hunters for coyotes. One dog was even a black lab.

Coyotes are often blamed for killing too many deer, when in actuality the number of deer that coyotes kill cannot be estimated. And these numbers are probably not as high as the amount of deer that hunters kill each year.

Coyotes are opportunistic feeders, which means that they will eat almost anything that is edible and available. According to a 2011 study conducted by a UVM graduate student, "Food Habits and Foraging Behavior of Coyotes in Vermont," scat analyses revealed that the majority of a coyote's diet consists of small mammals, birds, insects, vegetation and human refuse.

Though to be fair, who is more deserving of their efforts — the deer hunter, driven mainly by the thrill of the hunt, or the coyote, which must kill in order to survive? Despite assumptions that coyotes decrease the deer population, there has been no research that proves that coyote control results in larger deer numbers.

According to the Eastern Coyote Institute, when a coyote population is thinned out through the killing of individual members, a survival response actually stimulates their population growth through larger litters and more breeding females. Based on these considerations, the reason for decreasing the number of coyotes is unfounded and the whole process of coyote control could be seen as counterproductive, unless hunters were able to nearly wipe out the entire species.

Maine's coyote control is needless and unregulated and merely serves the purpose of providing financial stability to the IF&;W rather than an environmentally responsible way to manage wildlife.
IF&W cannot claim to be stewards of Maine's wildlife and represent the Maine people if it does not equally uphold the values of all of our state's citizens, not just those who hunt

Less than 5 percent of the entire population of the United States are registered hunters (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, "2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation"), and yet the voices of hunters are often listened to more than nonhunters because they bring in profits.
This is not a fair representation of the population and this is not fair for wildlife. We need to make a concerted effort in Maine to conduct responsible and educated management of our coyote population or face the consequences of an irreversibly unbalanced natural ecosystem.

Heather Bolint of Damariscotta is a 2009 graduate of Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Fl., where she earned a BA in environmental studies.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

R. Goldman: Wildlife policy without demonization

By Robert Goldman; sunjournal.com

Natural predators are a vital part of every healthy ecosystem. Without them, other wildlife become weak and sick and the overall ecology becomes unhealthy and out of balance.

No matter how many times Paul Reynolds propagandizes ("A lesson to be learned in Lolo," Sun Journal, Jan. 29) about the supposed evils of wolves, coyotes and other natural predators he so desperately wants his readers to demonize and hate, alongside him and his misguided cohorts, the actual truth will come out.

The days of unopposed demonization and abuse of Maine's and America's wildlife are over.
In his latest wildlife propaganda piece, Reynolds states that wolves and only wolves have greatly reduced the population of elk in a particular region of Idaho called Lolo.
What he conveniently neglected to share is that the elk population began declining in Lolo many years before wolves had even returned there. He also did not report that in 23 of 29 wildlife management zones in Idaho, elk populations meet or exceed Idaho's own elk population targets. Approximately 103,000 elk roam Idaho, thriving amidst hundreds (not thousands) of wolves. There are plenty of elk in Idaho for wolves and humans.

Anyone can find this information by visiting the websites of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, and an independent group called the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.

No one should rely on natural predator-hating zealots for accurate information about ecology.
When the rise and fall of deer and elk populations are honestly assessed, it always seems to come down to destruction or disturbance of vital wildlife habitat, weather, disease and over-hunting by humans. Objective wildlife biologists, including the state and federal biologists I've spoken with recently, do not pin "the blame" on natural predation. They accept natural predation as a vital part of every healthy ecosystem, just as most reasonable, informed and honest people do.

Which brings us to Maine. Paul Reynolds wants Mainers to join him in the coyote demonization campaign he and others are pushing here. No matter what the actual science reveals about the devastating loss of vital deer wintering habitat to clear-cutting and human greed, the related mortality of Maine's northernmost deer population due to recent harsh winters, the lack of publicly owned and protected lands in this state — as safe havens for deer to reproduce and thrive — the coyote demonizers continue to clamor and scream for killing coyotes as their twisted solution to deer heaven here in Maine.

They are either willfully misinformed or dishonest with the facts.Dishonesty, demonization and disrespect toward natural predators makes for immoral, wrong-headed and unhealthy wildlife policy.
Maine's wildlife and wild lands deserve better than that, as do the good people of this state.

Two Massachusetts Eastern Coyotes at their den site

Eastern Wolf in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada

Aldo Leopold--3 quotes from his SAN COUNTY ALMANAC

"We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."

Aldo Leopold

"A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise."

Aldo Leopold

''To keep every cog and wheel is the first precaution of intelligent tinkering."

Wildlife Rendezvous

Like so many conscientious hunters and anglers come to realize, good habitat with our full suite of predators and prey make for healthy and productive living............Teddy Roosevelt depicted at a "WILDLIFE RENDEZVOUS"

Recent Posts

Blog Disclaimer

This is a personal weblog. The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer. In addition, my thoughts and opinions change from time to time…I consider this a necessary consequence of having an open mind. This blog is intended to provide a semi-permanent point in time snapshot and manifestation of my various thoughts and opinions, and as such any thoughts and opinions expressed within out-of-date posts may not be the same, nor even similar, to those I may hold today. All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. Rick Meril and WWW.COYOTES-WOLVES-COUGARS.COM make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.