First of all, the plane couldn’t do the maneuvers it does after the wing comes off.

Second, at the end of the video there are “jumps” as the plane lands. Not to mention that the video conveniently goes blurry right there even though the shot hasn’t changed and there was no distance/perspective change that would affect that.

And I fixed your post with a link since, as NEO mentioned, you can’t imbed a video.

Signature

Attention to detail: An apostrophe is the difference between a company that knows its shit and a company that knows it’s shit.

Gonna second on the toy plane. Those things are wicked overpowered on the engines, and are better defined as ‘fin-stabilized propeller missiles’ than relying upon good ol’ Bernoulli for keeping them aloft. Losing a wing wouldn’t be a disaster, and some of them are *designed* to have the wings come off in a crash, to prevent greater damage.

Signature

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.