Andrew Wardhttp://newsbusters.org/taxonomy/term/2256/0
enFT Notes Scranton Union Worker Voting Reluctantly for Obamahttp://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2008/10/17/ft-notes-scranton-union-worker-voting-reluctantly-obama
<div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even" property="content:encoded"><p>Imagine the media maelstrom if a reporter found a swing-state Republican voter who had strong reservations about voting for John McCain, was flirting with the idea of voting for Barack Obama, but ultimately resigned him/herself to voting for McCain out of pressure from his/her evangelical church.</p><p>But make that a labor union Democrat from Pennsylvania and it's but a passing reference in a news story. </p><p>Reporting on how the presidential candidates were <a href="http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto101520081442176511" target="_blank">&quot;jostl[ing] for the Scranton vote,&quot;</a> Financial Times reporter Andrew Ward found a union worker who backed Hillary Clinton in the primaries and was reluctantly voting for Sen. Obama, in part because of union pressure. From the <a href="http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto101520081442176511&amp;page=2" target="_blank">October 15 paper</a> (emphasis mine):</p></div></div></div>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:30:17 +0000Ken Shepherd24272 at http://newsbusters.orgTobacco, Taxes Sunk McCain in 2000 S.C. Primary, Not Dirty Trickshttp://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2008/01/18/tobacco-taxes-sunk-mccain-2000-s-c-primary-not-dirty-tricks
<div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even" property="content:encoded"><p>One of the American mainstream media's favorite John McCain memes is that South Carolina voters rejected the Arizona Republican in 2000 because of a baseless smear campaign about McCain's personal life. That bias is so infectious it's now a global pandemic, just witness this item from the January 18 edition of the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fae2a9ca-c569-11dc-811a-0000779fd2ac.html" target="_blank">London-based Financial Times</a>:<br /></p><blockquote>McCain hopes to avoid repeat of 2000For John McCain, victory in tomorrow's Republican primary in South Carolina would exorcise the ghosts of the bitterest moment in his political career.It was in South Carolina in 2000 that his first presidential campaign crumbled after a vicious smear campaign by supporters of his opponent, George W. Bush.A barrage of misinformation was spread through phone calls and leaflets, including claims the Arizona senator had fathered an illegitimate black child and that his wife was a drug addict.The smears reinforced doubts about Mr McCain among social conservatives and helped deliver Mr Bush a victory that set him on course for the Republican nomination.</blockquote>
<p>The problem, of course is that the smear tactics were not only never proven to be linked to the Bush campaign, they are taken on face value as THE driving factor rather than conservative distaste for the more liberal stances of John McCain when set in contrast to then-Gov. Bush.For example, McCain ran, to be charitable, gun-shy on income tax cuts compared to then-Gov. Bush's tax cut plans. What's more, McCain actually pushed some tax hikes and demagogic rhetoric about a major industry in South Carolina centered on the state's most profitable <a href="http://www.state.sc.us/scda/relatedaglinks/boards/tobacco/legacy.htm" target="_blank">cash crop, tobacco</a>.Take this Nexis transcript excerpt from Linda Douglass's report on the Feb. 3, 2000 edition of ABC's "World News Tonight" (emphasis mine):</p>
</div></div></div>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:39:18 +0000Ken Shepherd18211 at http://newsbusters.org