+1
Daniel
2011/6/6 Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
> +1
>
> Carl
>
>
>
>
> +1
>>
>> Luc Moreau wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at
>>> the last teleconference:
>>> "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to
>>> express the provenance
>>> of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed
>>> concerns, which can be
>>> summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things.
>>>
>>> After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged
>>> towards a better
>>> proposal:
>>>
>>> /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to
>>> express the provenance of
>>> an invariant view or perspective on a thing./
>>>
>>> What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does
>>> not change, the thing
>>> itself can be mutable.
>>>
>>> To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this
>>> proposal?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Luc
>>>
>>> --
>>> Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel:
>>> +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23
>>> 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email:
>>> l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> United
>>> Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>