They do the maths in what would be needed to spray just the USA with the alleged chemicals that are claimed by the chemtards. They work out that: – “the government would need to schedule four million 747 flights to spread their chemicals each week—eighteen times more flights per day than in the entire US.” – “Unless a plane could make multiple runs per day, a true chemtrail conspiracy would need 2,700 times as many 747s as have ever been constructed.”

Not to mention the infrastructure and personal to support such an enterprise….and that is just for the USA, what about all the other countries?

I kinda think that this many flights and the infrastructure wold be noticeable wouldn’t it?

Follow this thread on Facebook in which a chemtard can not accept the fact that he (and they) keep falling for all the photoshopped images that pretend to prove them right. Look how he reacts when the proof is so clear, that no one but him can see it. And they wonder why they open themselves to ridicule.

Greenpeace have not seen sufficient evidence to justify further investigation into whether this is a real problem. As far as we are concerned, chemtrails are an urban myth – a conspiracy theory with no conspiracy.

A Facebook group was set up (Plea to Erin Brockovich for Legal Action against Chemtrails) to try and get activist lawyer Erin Brockovich to take on the case of legal action for the chemtrails. Not sure who they actually thought they could actually take legal action against, but Erin Brockovich did not want a bar of it. She is a smart lady and would have quickly realized what a load of nonsense the chemtards were spouting and that she wanted nothing to do with them. She knows a lost cause when she sees one.

The chemtards like to quote this testimony before the United nations as evidence for chemtrails:

1. It was NOT testimony before the UN. It was at a conference held in the UN building(big difference). 2. She is not a ‘whistleblower’, as she is not an insider and is blowing the whistle on nothing. 3. There is not one shred of proof in that video for chemtrails. 4. She is speaking in future tense about the possibilities of weather modification. That does not mean they are doing it and does not mean that chemtrails are real. 5. On You Tube, the video is reloaded several times with the title “Chemtrails, Here is your PROOF 100% Real “MUST WATCH” … epic fail. No proof there. Next.

and guess what; a couple of years after that conference at the UN, she went on to say that there is no evidence for chemtrails: