"Restore(s) a little sanity into current political debate" - Kenneth Minogue, TLS "Projects a more expansive and optimistic future for Americans than (the analysis of) Huntington" - James R. Kurth, National Interest "One of (the) most important books I have read in recent years" - Lexington Green

Advertising

Chicago Boyz is an Amazon and B&H Photo affiliate and earns money when you make Amazon or B&H purchases after clicking on an Amazon or B&H link on this blog.

Chicago Boyz is also a BlogAds affiliate and may earn money from advertising placed on this blog through the BlogAds network.

Some Chicago Boyz advertisers may themselves be Amazon affiliates who earn money from any Amazon purchases you make after you click on an Amazon link on their ad on Chicago Boyz or on their own web sites.

Chicago Boyz occasionally accepts direct paid advertising for goods or services that in the opinion of Chicago Boyz management would benefit the readers of this blog. Please direct any inquires to

Copyright

Chicago Boyz is a registered trademark of Chicago Boyz Media, LLC. All original content on the Chicago Boyz web site is copyright 2001-2016 by Chicago Boyz Media, LLC or the Chicago Boyz contributor who posted it. All rights reserved.

This is from the Prelinger Archives, which were acquired by the Library of Congress and also are part of the Internet Archive.

This entry was posted on Thursday, December 29th, 2011 at 5:29 pm and is filed under Anglosphere, Architecture, History, Video.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.

15 Responses to “San Francisco 1906, before the earthquake and subsequent fire”

I had a patient who was in San Francisco the morning of the earthquake. He was 88 at the time I operated on him for a painful aortic aneurysm. He was 15 the day of the earthquake. He had left home after an operation for appendicitis. He complained about his scar but I told him anyone who survived appendicitis in 1906 shouldn’t complain. John B Murphy described it in 1905.

Anyway, he didn’t like his stepfather so he left home to see the country. He was asleep in a rooming house when the quake hit about 5 AM. He and the boys sharing the room ran downstairs to the street. The brick dust was so thick they couldn’t see anything. The rooming house across the street had had the front wall fall down into the street and they could see the length of the building. When the shaking stopped, they went back upstairs and packed their bags, then headed out to see the city and what had happened.

He told me they sat in Union Square and watched the city burn on all four sides. Most of the damage was from fire. They left their bags in a saloon and then, when they went back to get them, the fire was getting close and the saloon was closed. A policeman let them break in to get the bags.

The water mains were all broken so water was brought in on barges from Oakland and people lined up with pails at the Embarcadero for water. It took a month before he could get a ship out of the city. He eventually made it to Seattle where his sister lived. He walked through Seattle asking stone masons (which his brother-in-law was) where to find his sister

He eventually ended up with a new car dealership in Omaha, Nebraska. When I knew him, he lived in a mobile home park in El Toro and swam laps in the pool every day. He lived a few more years after his aneurysm surgery. Quite a guy.

@Jeff – Predicting the future can be a dangerous endeavor. It is fun to look at Popular Science predictions from 30-40-50 years ago – some – like “household computers” are spot-on while others (personal rotor craft instead of cars) – made in the late 1940s for the 1990s – are hilarious.

The wheel has been around for a long time – don’t discount them ;-)

Same with internal combustion engines. Remember the predictions of the Wankel engine displacing the piston engine? (I know both are I believe by definition internal combustion)

I remember reading an interesting article on Mazda – having bought the patent for the Wankel they thought they had an out-of-the-box revolutionary engine – and learned they would have a lot of expensive engineering to do to make it commercially viable.

(the small German car maker NSU had a Wankel-powered car but it was terribly unreliable)

Anyway Mazda makes it commercially viable, finds that compared to the piston engine which – Carl Benz made viable for a car in 1886 – anyway there is a question whether Mazda will have a Wankel engine in any new cars.

Some technology while old is still good and much easier to improve than radically new technology…

An excellent book on the San Francisco earthquake is Simon Winchester’s “A Crack in the Edge of the World’. I read this book about a year ago and found it very informative, like all his books that I’ve read. He has a narrative style, interspersed with anecdotes and some technical details that will inform and hold your interest.

Actually, the wheel thing and technology in general wasn’t my point. I was talking about how the perception of our technology will be just like our perception of the technology of 1906 San Francisco as shown in the video. They will look on with fascination and great interest, and notice small details that may be missed in still photos like using the cable car tracks for wagon wheel guides. I just find it interesting to consider the possible perceptions of the future viewer of our times.