Lleyton gives 100% in his matches , but he simply doesnt have, never had ability to win crucial points. Thats why he was always Federers turkey.

he lacks of power to punish Tipsarevic or any fast player, his forehand is a big joke, even Ferrer's has a better FH. He managed to hit the lines with good angles but with no power, Tipsarevic looked like DelPo hitting the ball compared to Hewitt.

It's time to retire you old champion.

__________________

Supporting the Ballbasher Nation, some of our proud soldiers:Juan Martin del Potro - Robin Soderling - Ernests Gulbis - Thomas Berdych - Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Exiled: JanowiczPusher Nation's Reign of Terror is coming to an end, their borders are conquered and we won't take any prisoners!
Get Ready King Mandy!

Well... It was a pretty good match, both playing their heart on the court.
Sadly, when Lleyton could have won the first 2 sets, the best form ot Tipsy came off, and they played some beautiful points, it'd be amazing to see the highlights of the match.

Lleyton gives 100% in his matches , but he simply doesnt have, never had ability to win crucial points. Thats why he was always Federers turkey.

Silly thing to say. Hewitt was once excellent during crucial points (hence why he won so many close matches), not to mention he wasn't always 'Federer's Turkey'. And Hewitt didn't necessarily have a problem winning crucial points against Federer during his prime, he had problems winning any kind of point at times.

However, if we propose a match between a prime Hewitt against a post-prime Federer, the dynamics would be completely different and a potential nightmare for the slower, less self-assured Federer.