Rotating EU presidency holder Bulgaria admitted yesterday (14 May) there was no certainty that the new long-term EU budget for 2020-2027 could be adopted before next year’s European elections.

Speaking to the press following a webstreamed budget discussion held in the General Affairs Council, Bulgarian foreign minister Ekaterina Zaharieva described the discussion as “quite honest” and said a “huge varieties of opinion” had been expressed.

This is the first time that national ministers have discussed the Commission proposal tabled on 2 May.

The next 2021-2027 budget will be the first after the UK’s departure from the bloc in March 2019. As a result, the Commission had to plug a funding gap left by London’s contributions of between €10 billion and €12 billion, while investing in new priorities.

The EU executive proposed a ceiling of €1.3 trillion, equivalent to around 1.14% of EU gross national income, up from the previous 1.03%.

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and his Budget Commissioner Günther Oettinger received a largely positive reception from MEPs to their proposal for the next long-term EU budget from 2021-2027.

Budget Commissioner Günther Oettinger said he had read all the critical comments in public statements and on social media, which in his words shows that the Commission’s proposal is the right one.

He warned that if EU countries fail to agree in the coming months, the budget agreement would be delayed after the May 2019 European elections, which would be detrimental to projects when funding is expected to be increased, such as research, youth programmes etc.

Oettinger also warned ministers to be aware that “autocrats” in Moscow, Ankara and Washington were watching the debate.

Nevertheless, Poland and Hungary expressed serious concerns about the legal base of the Commission’s proposal to introduce conditionality between EU funding and the rule of law. Konrad Szymanski, the Polish European affairs minister, called it a “massive power grab”.

A major innovation in the next long-term EU budget proposed by the European Commission yesterday (2 May) is the conditionality between EU funding and the rule of law. But the country holding the EU Presidency voiced its own clear rejection.

#MFF "Conditionnality is a massive power grab by the @EU_Commission " says Konrad Szymanski, #Poland European affairs minister at the #GAC Council

Swedish minister for EU affairs and trade Ann Linde was critical of the increase in total expenditure and also insisted on the conditionality factor. Other net contributor countries, such as Austria and the Netherlands, object to paying more into the EU coffers.

“The Swedish Government is critical of the large increase in total expenditure and wants burdens to be shared fairly. We also expect EU countries to stand up for our common values and welcome the idea of conditionality in the #EUbudget.” — EU Minister @AnnLinde at #GACpic.twitter.com/bUmhFQ23dh

Zaharieva said the Bulgarian Presidency planned to organise seven working groups at expert level to discuss the long-term EU budget, one every week until the 28-29 June EU Council summit.

The #EU citizens deserve a good budget that makes sure #Europe?? works for all of them. @EU2018BG already started the debates and in the next month and a half, we will organize 7 working groups with experts for #MFF discussions. pic.twitter.com/Kk67Z9IsQB

Zaharieva said it was up to EU leaders to agree on a timetable, when asked about the chances of the budget being adopted before the European elections.

She added that these were going to be the “most difficult” negotiations for the EU budget, adding “but in my opinion – it doesn’t mean we should not try to do this before the EU elections”.

Diplomats say delaying the decision-making after the European elections may be counterproductive, as in such a case the issue would fall in the hands of an inexperienced Commission and a possibly much more eurosceptic European Parliament.

EURACTIV's editorial content is independent from the views of our sponsors.

Media is a pillar of democracy – as long as it can function properly. Now more than ever we need unbiased, expert information on how and why the European Union functions. This information should not be behind a paywall, and we remain committed to providing our content for free.

We know our readers value our reporting. We know journalism that covers the EU in a clear, unbiased way is critical to the future of the European Union. And we know your support is critical for ensuring this independent and free journalism.

Don’t take the media sector for granted. It was already fragile before the coronavirus pandemic. And as people can’t meet, media companies have lost a major source of revenue: events. EURACTIV is supported by a mix of revenue streams including sponsorships, online advertising, EU-funded projects, and policy debates. All of these sources of revenue are impacted by the current crisis.

While media struggles, disinformation thrives. We are already seeing fearmongering, fake news about the EU response, and increased threats to freedom of the press.

For more than two decades we have provided free, independent, multilingual reporting on the European Union. We continue to believe in Europe, and we hope you do too.

Your financial support at this critical time will allow our network of newsrooms across Europe to continue their work when Europe needs it most.

Contribute to our reporting

The need for fast, accurate and balanced information is always important. We value EURACTIV's good, independent journalism and support this initiative

Mella Frewen, Director General of FoodDrinkEurope

EURACTIV plays a vital role in bringing Europe closer to its citizens. EURACTIV has long recognised that the story of Europe has to be told across the continent, and not just in Brussels. We need to support a truly European and informed debate.