The bill requires the director of research of legislative council to provide a regulator navigator to the public. The regulator navigator will provide the public with easy access to information about any state, local, or federal government rule or regulation, including the name and telephone number of the person to contact or the correct web site link regarding the rule or regulation at issue. The regulator navigator is not expected to be a problem solver, but is expected to be an expert in providing the public with quality contact information for the appropriate state, local, or federal government agency. Assigned to the State Veterans and Military Affairs Committee.

Search

Featured CLE: March 13, 2015

About CBA-CLE Legal Connection

CBA CLE Legal Connection is published by Colorado Bar Association CLE (also known as CLE in Colorado, Inc.). It is focused on delivering timely resources, updates and continuing legal education to … [Read More...]

Want to hear more from CBA-CLE Legal Connection?

Featured Homestudy: Business Law Institute

Does an employer’s drug-free workplace policy trump an employee’s use of medical marijuana to treat medical conditions that may qualify as a disability? Yes, according to a recent decision by a Colorado federal judge. In Curry v. MillerCoors, Inc., Judge John Kane rejected a terminated employee’s claim that his employer discriminated against him on the basis of his disability when it discharged him for testing positive for marijuana. Read more about this case and others in the Business Law Institute homestudy - click here to order!

Law Practice Tip of the Week

Solo Tip Tuesday: Keep Track of Requests You've Made of Others in a Folder Called @WFFThis could be my all-time favorite tip. We often use email to ask someone to send us something, or check on something and get back to us, etc. Sending the email is the easy part. The hard part is keeping track of what you asked for and when, and then remembering to follow up when the person doesn’t get back to you. Click here to read more.

Archives

Latest Posts

A creditor obtains a judgment against Hocker for $4.4 million, and seeks to levy and execute upon Hocker’s shares in the Highland Ditch Company. Hocker owns an undivided 50 percent interest in two and three-quarter shares of Highland stock. The Highland shares represent Hocker’s right to use water that runs through a mutually owned ditch, a branch of which leads to a pond on the 35-acre farm that Hocker owns with her husband. Hocker files a claim under the homestead exemption, asserting that the shares, which represent water rights appurtenant to her farm, could not be levied. The court denies Hocker’s claim of exemption, and Hocker appeals.