NOVEDGE: Tools to Design the Future is the leading online software store for design professionals. From architects to engineers, from filmmakers to graphic designers, we go to great length to find all the software you need, so you can focus on your projects.
Our website offers unparalleled search and comparison charts, with clear licensing information for over 7,000 titles. Our team is knowledgeable and can offer unbiased advice, guiding you to the right products for your specific needs and our prices are the the most competitive in the industry.
We recognize the everyday creativity of all the professionals designing the future today: your passion and innovation make our world possible.

Visit Novedge

About Novedge

Novedge is the leading online store for design software. Visit our website for unparalleled search, comparison charts, and licensing information for over 8,000 titles at competitive prices.

August 29, 2007

CAD Companies Push the Marketing Frontier on Wikipedia

Reading Paul Wilkinson blog, I discovered a sophisticated and pretty useful online tool called Wikipedia Scanner created by Virgil Griffith. Using the WikiScanner anybody can check the anonymous editing of Wikipedia pages done from computers registered under company domains such as Autodesk, SolidWork, and Adobe. A search for edits from the Autodesk domain returns a long list of Wikipedia editing activity, spread over several topics, with only a few related to CAD and AutoCAD. Some of the edits are about Autodesk products and are useful contributions to the Wikipedia project. Other edits feel more like a marketing operation than a sincere, objective contribution.

One example is from November 12, 2006, when someone from an Autodesk computer, IP 198.102.112.18, edited the SolidWorks' page, adding this sentence to the product description: "In recent years it has begun to lose ground to more sophisticated modeling systems like Autodesk Inventor, launched in 1999, and Solid Edge in 1996."

What is particularly fascinating is the variety of topics edited from Autodesk computers. You can find editing on pages ranging from the Roman Empire page (see the edit) to the Pretty Ricky, a R&B group (see the edit).

Edits from SolidWorks' computers are slightly less interesting. Someone edited the Autodesk products pages a few times, typically trimming the more explicit marketing statements (by the way, mostly posted from Autodesk computers). Here's one example where the sentence “Generally considered a latecomer to the market, Inventor has quickly become the number one mid-market modeler” later became “Generally considered a latecomer to the market, Inventor has been bundled with AutoCAD to increase usage”. The page was edited from IP 12.159.140.125, a computer on SolidWorks domain.

Another interesting example is from July 15, 2006, when someone from a SolidWorks' computer, this time from IP 12.145.143.98, edited the SolidWorks' page and added this candidly promotional sentence: "Click here to learn more about COSMOSFloWorks" (see edit).

The last pearl I found using Wikipedia Scanner is from Adobe (see all edits): on July 22, 2005 someone from an Adobe computer, IP 192.150.10.200, changed the Carly Fiorina page on Wikipedia, calling the then HP CEO, “Bitchy Fiorina” (see edit).

Comments

That's a neat tool. Here's one I found in the CFD space (Computational Fluid Dynamics page). Apparently someone from Fluent domain changed:

"STAR-CD - Most used CFD code in the Automotive industry, also strong useage across industries. Reputation for being technology leaders, with CAD-embedded, polyhedral meshing and Computational Continuum Mechanics"

to:

"STAR-CD - Previously the most used CFD code in the Automotive industry (now replaced by FLUENT), also strong useage across industries. Reputation for polyhedral meshing and Computational Continuum Mechanics"

@Robert B. Price
Most of the time Wikipedia is a reliable source of information. Tools like Wiki-Scanner invented by Virgil Griffith are only making the creation and editing of Wikipedia pages a more transparent and therefore reliable process.

My personal opinion about the specific topic of anonymous edits on Wikipedia is that they should be banned and nobody would ever miss them.

Of what use is a supposedly reliable database if anyone in the world can go in and promiscuosly edit the content of the database?

Originally, as I understand it, Wikapedia was supposedly a place to go for reliable information much like an Encyclopedia but not any more. Black can become gray or worse yet, red at the click of a mouse.