The development of a toxicity database using freshwater macroinvertebrates and its application to South African water resource protection.

Palmer Carolyn et al. 2004, 'The development of a toxicity database using freshwater macroinvertebrates, and its application to the protection of South African water resources', F R D, vol. 100, no. NA, pp. 643-650.

Palmer Carolyn et al. 2004, 'The development of a toxicity database using freshwater macroinvertebrates, and its application to the protection of South African water resources', F R D, vol. 100, no. NA, pp. 643-650.

There is a growing international trend towards the protection of
freshwater resources from pollution by imposing instream guidelines
and specified waste-discharge conditions. Current methods
for devising freshwater quality guidelines are based on species
sensitivity distributions (SSDs) that are used to identify pollutant
concentrations, ensuring the protection of a modelled percentage
of species (95% protection is a common goal). SSDs are derived
from the toxicity test results of as many taxa as possible for each
polluting substance. Waste-discharge licences can be for single
substances, specified in terms of chemical concentrations, and
derived in conjunction with instream guidelines; or for complex
mixtures, specified in terms of toxic units. In both cases toxicity test
results are the core data used. The emphasis on SSDs calls into
question the species constituting the test populations. It is likely
that SSDs based in part on the responses of local organisms will
achieve superior site-specific ecological protection. Until the early
1990s, there were very few data on the tolerances of South African
freshwater organisms. In the intervening decade, the Unilever
Centre for Environmental Water Quality at Rhodes University has
developed a toxicity database that, to date, records the responses
of 21 South African freshwater taxa to 26 single-substance pollutants
or mixtures. This is the most comprehensive database of South
African toxicity responses available and has been used in the drawing
up of methods and guidelines to protect water resources. This
paper aims to make these data available and to describe applications
of the data using selected case studies.

en_US

dc.publisher

South African Association for the Advancement of Science

en_US

dc.relation.ispartof

South African Journal of Science

en_US

dc.relation.isbasedon

NA

en_US

dc.title

The development of a toxicity database using freshwater macroinvertebrates and its application to South African water resource protection.

There is a growing international trend towards the protection of
freshwater resources from pollution by imposing instream guidelines
and specified waste-discharge conditions. Current methods
for devising freshwater quality guidelines are based on species
sensitivity distributions (SSDs) that are used to identify pollutant
concentrations, ensuring the protection of a modelled percentage
of species (95% protection is a common goal). SSDs are derived
from the toxicity test results of as many taxa as possible for each
polluting substance. Waste-discharge licences can be for single
substances, specified in terms of chemical concentrations, and
derived in conjunction with instream guidelines; or for complex
mixtures, specified in terms of toxic units. In both cases toxicity test
results are the core data used. The emphasis on SSDs calls into
question the species constituting the test populations. It is likely
that SSDs based in part on the responses of local organisms will
achieve superior site-specific ecological protection. Until the early
1990s, there were very few data on the tolerances of South African
freshwater organisms. In the intervening decade, the Unilever
Centre for Environmental Water Quality at Rhodes University has
developed a toxicity database that, to date, records the responses
of 21 South African freshwater taxa to 26 single-substance pollutants
or mixtures. This is the most comprehensive database of South
African toxicity responses available and has been used in the drawing
up of methods and guidelines to protect water resources. This
paper aims to make these data available and to describe applications
of the data using selected case studies.

OPUS Help

OPUS

OPUS (Open Publications of UTS Scholars) is the UTS institutional repository. It showcases the research of UTS staff and postgraduate students to a global audience. For you, as a researcher, OPUS increases the visibility and accessibility of your research by making it openly available regardless of where you choose to publish.

Items in OPUS are enhanced with high quality metadata and seeded to search engines such as Google Scholar as well as being linked to your UTS research profile, increasing discoverability and opportunities for citation of your work and collaboration. In addition, works in OPUS are preserved for long-term access and discovery.

The UTS Open Access Policy requires UTS research outputs to be openly available via OPUS. Depositing your work in OPUS also assists you in complying with ARC, NHMRC and other funder Open Access policies. Providing Open Access to your research outputs through OPUS not only ensures you comply with these important policies, but increases opportunities for other researchers to cite and build upon your work.

OPUS archives UTS research submitted for Higher Education Research Data Collection (HERDC) and Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA). It also stores digital theses and forms of scholarship that do not usually see formal publication.

How can you deposit works in OPUS?

When you claim (or enter) your research in Symplectic Elements, simply upload a copy of your work which can be made openly available. Symplectic provides information on which version of your work to upload. If you are unsure, please supply a copy of the Accepted Manuscript version. Ensure you check the box to "agree to the OPUS license terms".

Once uploaded, your works are automatically sent to OPUS and placed temporarily in Closed Access until reviewed by UTS Library staff.