Many of you have told me you were planning on attending our trial in
Seattle versus Microsoft in just 3 short weeks. Lindows.com
was well
prepared to put on a mountain of evidence (some of which you all helped
us gather) to demonstrate that Microsoft did not invent the word
'windows'. Magazines, dictionaries, testimony, and competitors' products
show that it was widely used before Microsoft selected it as part of
their product name. In fact, that widespread use throughout the
computer industry was exactly why Microsoft chose it. But
you'll want to cancel your travel plans thanks to a new development.

Just a few hours ago the Judge sided
with Lindows.com
on two major issues which dramatically changes the
momentum in our case (www.lindows.com/genericness).
Judge Coughenour ruled that once a word is
generic it is always generic and therefore ineligible for
trademark status. Microsoft's position is that because they have spent
1.2 billion dollars on marketing and because they have monopoly market
share in the PC industry that this had changed the definition of the
word 'windows', making it their own word. This position was flatly
rejected by the court. Additionally, the court ruled that the time
frame to examine to determine genericness is not how the word is used
today, but rather before Microsoft began shipping its first commercial copies of Microsoft Windows 1.0. Since Microsoft's first windows product came out in late
1985, we have been collecting evidence prior to that date to present to
the jury and now we know that is the precise time period that matters.

Microsoft has asked the Judge if they could appeal his ruling which he
is going to allow them to do. I believe they have 10 days to file the
appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. I spoke with one reporter
who said that Microsoft is claiming a victory with the courts ruling
which I find astonishing. You don't appeal favorable rulings and ask for
them to be reversed, yet that is what Microsoft is doing. Lindows.com
is ready to go to trial. We are ready for a jury to hear the facts,
come to a conclusion and abide by the court's ultimate findings. These
latest rulings will help us prevail in our case.

Microsoft's appeal is a delay tactic to avoid a trial in the U.S. and
allow them more time to pile on lawsuits in other countries to harass
us and our partners. Microsoft does not want to go to trial because
they have a list of the evidence we are going to present (you are
required to turn it over to them in advance) and they know it is
powerful. Instead, they'd rather delay the trial and send letters to our partners around the world threatening more lawsuits. We
are once again asking you to help us bring choice to the PC industry
around the world by making available a limited number of lifetime
memberships at http://www.choicepc.com. I hope
you'll consider
supporting us in this way.

More than two years ago, Microsoft sued Lindows.com
at the time
claiming that irreparable harm was being done to their business by our
use of the word 'Lindows' and asking for us to be immediately shut down.
The Judge rejected their request - multiple times. Since then, we've
slowly trudged towards a trial with Microsoft asking for delays at
virtually every opportunity along the way. If Microsoft sincerely
believed that their business was being harmed, they should want an
expedient hearing of the issues. Their actions indicate otherwise.

This latest move adds another lengthy delay, but the day will come when
Microsoft will be forced to face Lindows.com and desktop Linux.
Not
just in the courtroom, but in the marketplace as well. Microsoft may be
able to forestall that day of reckoning with their money and army of
attorneys, but Lindows.com is not going away in
spite of Microsoft's
tactics and neither is desktop Linux.

-- Michael

The Michael's Minute Meter

55%

22%

22%

AGREE

DISAGREE

MIXED

Do YOU generally agree or disagree with Michael in this week's Minute shown above?