Come on! The financial irresponsibility is not the issue. The issue is the fact that they are unlawfully evicting people from their homes. I'm sure if
this was a lawful eviction, there would not be an issue at all.

If you have a problem with financial irresponsibility, you should be having a problem with the Banksters, not with the average Joe. You own and run
this site, that means you're probably more aware than anyone else that the world is run by an elite group of Bankers and that 90% of the world's
problems are because of them.

Bailiffs are scum.
It's not just the housing and we all know that.
I live on a housing estate of around sixty thousand people.
At least thirty percent are unemployed.

It's feeding ground for bailiffs and I've seen young families lose everything....of what little they have....for not paying a TV licence or just
owing a couple of hundred quid.
These people are scared sh# tless because they don't know their rights.

I think that's what the video was trying to point out.
People just don't know their rights where bailiffs are concerned.

I do... What part of civil issue do you not understand? I can try to explain it to you if you wish. It might go a long way to helping you overcome
your ignorance of this topic.

As an example - learn what established residency is under Florida Domestic Laws.
Secondly, learn how that same law works when it comes to trespassing.
Third, learn how that same law has nothing to do with the civil piortion, which would be the sublet portion, along with an illegal eviction.

It's not often I take the time to watch a 30 minute video, but in this case I did, and I thank you for bringing it to my attention.

It was truly a golden moment seeing the defeated bailiff politely ask for the keys and for him to step aside! Amazing that the bailiff still
deliberately trespassed after being advised by the Sgt to walk away, as if he couldn't process the fact that he was powerless!

I am a person who honours my agreements and I understand what you are saying. But when you sign a deal with the devil, and catch him out also not
abiding by the T&Cs of that deal, I think it is fair game to use it against him, as he would you.

I think when they came back the second time, it would of been with a warrant for contempt of court or something, however initially I think he was in
the right, while the mortgagor may have had the legal right to take possession, they did not have the legal use force to take possession.

I hope the man in the video sues the bailiff and lock smith and other fat guy for multiple counts trespass, and the initial battery when he came
through the door and the threat to hit him which is another assault.

Trespass and assault is 'actionable per se which means you don't need to suffer damage to sue. He would get his legal costs awarded and
likely some punitive damages. If he is broke the punitive damages would come in handy... he might be able to service the mortgage..

I don't know if they were even there the day the locks were changed. The company I work for waits 30 days after an eviction and even gives the people
a key to get to get their stuff.

I have seen mobile homes with payments as low as $300 a month which have been repossessed. I try not to get personally involved because you don't
know the particulars of how and why a person lost their home.

There is one thing for sure... they did not plan on losing it..... crap happens....

You already know my feeling's about bailiffs from my own thread.....but I have to say that after fighting my own case with bailiffs ( that didn't
involve a repossession) and after getting the redress I did from rip off, fraudulent bailiffs acting outside of the law ( which they do knowingly)
...I feel the satisfaction of those on the right side of the law in the vid!

More people need to know their right's and the fraudulent an illegal act's and threat's should be exposed more!

I called the police ,when they arrived they told me it was a civil matter there was nothing they could do.I said that since it was a civil matter I'm
goimg back in.They then told me I was not allowed when I started to go back in they threatened to tase me and ordered me to turn over my key.

What part of civil issue and law enforcement having no jurisdiction in civil issues do you not understand?

Lets try it this way... If someone whows up aty our house with faulty reposession paperwork, it is a civil issue. However, criminal tresspassing is
not a civil issue, and occurs when a person has no lawful right to be on said property.

Please take the time to learn the difference between civil and criminal issues and how they apply would you please.

Please go back to my first reply, or read any of the other's. The Police stated "This is a civil matter" afterward's they threatened to use force. You
can read a book, or know rules. The problem is rule's aren't always followed.

Here's another video of educated people standing up for their rights against unlawful repossessions.
Courtesy of ats member helious who brought this to the oppt thread....proberly worthy of its own thread....

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.