But six years ago, James Hansen was upset that they didn’t agree, and that there was no warming after the hottest year of 1998. Trenberth was also upset about the lack of warming. He called it a travesty.

If It’s That Warm, How Come It’s So Damned Cold?
by James Hansen, Reto Ruedy, Makiko Sato, and Ken Lo

12 Responses to Smoking Gun Of Fraud And Collusion Between Government Agencies

“Nog nooit eerder is zo vroeg in het jaar al zo’n lage maximumtemperatuur gemeten als woensdag in Maastricht.”
(Never before so early in the year such a low maximum temperature has been measured as Wednesday in Maastricht.)

Every idoit knows that todays cold is not our grandfather’s cold. His cold was real cold. Cold that was created by cold. Leading climate scientists all say that today’s cold is different, results from jetstream disruption, which is obviously a result of Mann-made global warming.

Only a huge carbon tax, plus an extensive crap and trade flim flam scheme will ever allow cold to be real cold again. Isn’t that what you want for your children and grandchildren?

That’s a good thought, Steve… I doubt the change was simultaneous. If one could find the historical sequence of when each agency updated their previous charts, it could indicate a sequence / timeline of collusion. I find it striking that each agency correlates so well also. I don’t think anyone has any illusions that the agencies are independent or use independent data, but it seems to me they are entirely dependent on the same data and processing. In other words, they are all making the same mistakes. I find it unbelieveable that any scientists would independently make the same assumptions / data treatment, and result in such replicable results, even using the same data. If they were even remotely independent, there is zero chance of that good a match. I’m thinking GISS sends the results to everyone, and each adds some random noise and pubishes the results as independent.

Tony, some person called Leftwithrightbrain is going around on blogs saying you had to write letters of apology to NASA, GISS and NOAA for criticizing their data and admitting you were wrong to avoid libel suit. I called him a bald-face liar since you slam their data, daily. He also claimed to be a published climate scientist.

It surreal to hear people like O, I can’t even write his name, say the weather is the biggest threat to the world. Why these fools aren’t laughed into oblivion sure beats me and how they can hold a summit and discuss this with a straight face is downright frightening.