Is it safe to assume he was probably going to edit most of it to make Pres. Obama appear as some White Hating, Radical?Given the Fact that Andrew Breitbart was NOT a Supporter of Pres. Obama & Vehemently Disagreed with his Administration, its Safe to assume this theory.

One of the videos in his collection was of a Young Barack Obama during his time at Harvard Law School.

He was speaking to a group of Students & Staff, encouraging them to Welcome Diversity.What's So Controversial About this particular Video?

NOTHING!

However if you Edit this Video, Add Words and Additional Scenes to it, you could make Pres. Obama appear as a White Hating, Radical.

As I stated last week when news about Andrew Breitbart's death first surfaced, he knew something & was going to use to upset the 2012 Election.

Do I Believe Pres. Obama's people had Anything to do with Breitbart's Death?

NO! Of Course NOT! NOT in a Million Years!

I don't know how or why Andrew Breitbart died but I do know he was planning on doing something Extremely Dirty to hurt President Obama.

As my Grandmother used to say to people who did her wrong:"God does NOT like Ugly so you better watch yourself!"

Wait...that was it? The shocking videotape unearthed by the late, right-wing gadfly Andrew Breitbart, the one that was supposed to finally prove that Barack Obama is indeed the crazed race warrior that the right has tried to portray him to be since 2007, has turned out to be neither new, nor newsworthy.

Breitbart was supposedly working on a major exposé on the tape, which shows Obama during his days at Harvard Law School in the early 90s. It leaked early -- a suspicious cabal of liberal media elites at Buzzfeed having scooped Fox News' Sean Hannity by using the clandestine tactics that the Left calls "licensing the video from Boston's PBS TV station."

What they found will shock and horrify you -- if you are shocked and horrified by pithy compliments delivered before a mixed race crowd at the frightening Saul Alinsky radical training ground of Cambridge, Massachusetts.

In the video, Obama is speaking at a campus rally in support of Professor Derrick Bell, the first tenured black professor at Harvard Law School and one of just a handful of minorities -- and women -- with such posts in the early 90s. At the time, a student group called the Coalition for Civil Rights, which was comprised of black, Hispanic, women and gay student organizations, demanded that Harvard diversify its faculty.

(Similar protests, sit ins and demands were taking place at the undergraduate college, where the head of the African-American studies department was a white woman.

Those protests ultimately led to the hiring of Henry Louis Gates to lead the Afro-American Studies department and for a time brought Professor Cornel West to Harvard, where he battled with then Harvard University president and future adviser to President Barack Obama, Lawrence Summers.)

Bell took a leave of absence and refused to return until the law school tenured a black woman. The protests in the "smoking gun" video, which the Right is certain will take the president down, were in support of Bell's actions. In the tape, Obama tells a story about Bell addressing first year law students, saying that Bell didn't accomplish all that he did "because of his good looks and easy charm, though he has both in amble measure." The mostly white audience laughs. Scandal!

Hannity, in his Wednesday Fox show, ominously informed his audience that "in the next frame, Obama embraces the 'controversial' professor, but that part of the tape was 'covered up' by Obama's friend and Bell's fellow Harvard Law professor, Charles Ogletree, ahead of the 2008 election."

Hannity claimed that the video was selectively edited and was hidden by the media in order to protect Obama from the kind of scrutiny that conservatives are forced to endure. In fact, PBS' Frontline aired the video in its entirety, in 2008, as part of a documentary on Obama's time at Harvard that has been available on YouTube for four years...

Hannity did his best to hype the video, which shows Obama looking and sounding almost exactly the way he does today, though with longer hair -- wait, Afros are a sign of being radical, right? -- and with his hands stuck in his pockets. He tells the crowd, "open your hearts and your minds to Derrick Bell." And it is on that phrase, and Bell's connection to an area of scholarship called "critical race theory," that the anti-Obama right plans to base its attacks.

Hannity and his guests, two editors from Breitbart's BigJournalism.com, -- who for some reason kept giggling -- spent much of the segment smearing Derrick Bell, who died last year and cannot defend himself. They called Bell a "radical," and the "Jeremiah Wright of academia." They claimed that there was a "media cover up" of this shocking videotape, which has a sinister demonstration of Obamaian mildness.

In the next segment, Fox commentator Juan Williams disappointed those in the studio by declaring that the tape was nothing new. "I expected more than that," he said. That might be the understatement of the year.

Boykin said that Obama didn't participate in most of the campus protests or in the Coalition for Civil Rights lawsuit against Harvard Law. But on key occasions, such as that day in 1991, Obama, who was something of a campus celebrity because of this status as the first African-American to head the Law Review, lent his presence and support to the group and to Bell, which helped bring critical attention to the efforts, for which Boykin praised him.

And Boykin denied that the protests were some demonstration of black nationalism. "They centered around Professor Derrick Bell and a student led movement for diversity. It wasn't even a black thing. It was a coalition of black groups, the Latino group, women, gay groups... Most of the people at our events were white!"

As for the attempts by Hannity and his cohorts to tar the reputation of the late Professor Bell, Boykin said: "I spoke at Professor Bell's funeral at the Riverside church in Harlem last year. It was an ecumenical gathering of people of all races. He was nothing like that."

TSA REFORM: "DON'T TOUCH MY JUNK NOR MY TREASURES!"

NC DSS SYSTEM CASUALTIES...CHILDREN DON'T MATTER

REAL CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS; EQUALITY & JUSTICE FOR ALL!

POLITICAL WALL OF SHAME...PLEASE VOTE RESPONSIBLY

THE TRUE COST OF WAR

ABOUT ME

Welcome to the BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ Blog. (Established 2008)
My name is Laurel. (Author & Publisher)
I Blog with a focus on POLITICS, Business, and occasionally Entertainment.
FACTS ABOUT LAUREL:
Wife,
Mother of a U.S. Soldier,
Sister,
Woman of GOD,
Loyal Friend,
Creative,
Blood-related to a nationally known Charlotte Politician.
Black Female, Intelligent,
Married,
Love to Travel,
Credentialed by the RNC and DNC.
Political Blogger/ Commentator
Grassroots Activist,
PROFESSIONAL STATUS:
Credential Political Blogger/ Commentator,
Registered Independent Voter
Original Native of BROOKLYN, NY
Currently reside in CHARLOTTE, NC
I’m Nice but don’t get it twisted because my Mind is Sharp!

WEBSITE LEGAL DISCLAIMER

Since You’ve Chosen to Visit and Read the Contents of this Blog by Personal Choice, and of Your Own Free Will,

Please don’t ask me to Compensate you for Expressing individual commentary/ Posted Articles, which are protected by the First Amendment, citing Freedom of Speech & Freedom of Expression.

No Intentionally Malicious Slander, Libel or Defamation of Character content will be published and I will always Credit all Sources.

NOTE TO ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS, APPOINTED OFFICIALS & PUBLIC FIGURES:

Per the Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case: 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan………

The Public has a Right to Criticize the People who Govern them, so the least Protection from Defamation is given to Public Officials. When officials are accused of something that involves their behavior in office, they have to prove all of the above elements of defamation and they must also prove that the defendant acted with “actual malice.” (For a definition of actual malice, see the “History of Defamation and the First Amendment, below.”)

People who aren’t Elected but who are Still Public Figures because they are influential or famous — like Actors, Actresses, Movie Stars, Singers & Entertainers, Journalists, TV Hosts, Bloggers, etc., — also have to Prove that Defamatory statements were made with Actual Malice, in most cases.

To the Associated Press and other Media Organizations:

When I use your Content Links., I’m also citing the Fair Use Doctrine (Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107) for further Copyright permission.

Posts and Links published on Black Political Buzz are not endorsed by Black Political Buzz Blog Author Laurel’s Employer, nor the Employers of other Black Political Buzz employees.

This includes Links, Posts and Comments posted on Black Political Buzz’s Facebook and Twitter account pages.

Comments, Links and Opinions of site visitors are Independently-Owned and not endorsed by Black Political Buzz employees, Blog Author Laurel or Laurel’s Employer.)

(No Personal Offense intended) Please know that Black Political Buzz is not responsible for nor do I endorse Requests for Donations from Third Parties on this Blog.

I will Only Endorse Requests for Donations made on behalf of BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ Blog for Business Purposes & Operating Expenses.

I will also Only Endorse Requests for Donations on behalf of Legitimate Politicians and Legitimate Political Candidates. PERIOD!!

If anyone else or another Organization wishes to post a link to Request Donations, I am NOT endorsing ANY of those Requests!

Unless I receive a personal Request to do so and I have Professionally Confirmed that the Third Party Organization or Charity is indeed a Legitimate Entity.

NOTE: Anyone who chooses to give to any Third Party Organization NOT Endorsed by BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ is doing so at his or her own risk.

BLACK POLITICAL BUZZ does NOT Discriminate against Politicians, Political Candidates, Organizations or Charities based on Race, Color, Nationality, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual Orientation, Religion, Faith, Disability, Political Affiliation, Creed, Education, Social Status, Age.

This disclaimer applies to ANY and All requests for Donations on this Blog. Thanks for understanding. Again No Personal Offense intended.