On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:37:48 +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Given the messages I've quoted above, deferring debhelper changes until
> v10 makes most sense. This means we can file bugs on the release goal
> packages to use the invocations manually in the meantime, as well as
> a wishlist bug on debhelper for v10 (so we don't forget).
[..]
> Ditto. I think we have a way forward now which allows to to move
> forward just far enough. Hopefully pkg-perl and other module maintainers
> will be in a position to take on the task of updating release goal
> modules once a recipe has been sorted out.
Sure, as soon as the dust settles, I (and probably others in the
team) will happily help.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Nick Cave And The Bad Seeds: Hiding All Away