Supply of firearms means more killing

In The New York Times, Roger Ebert writes that massacres like the one in Aurora have less to do with particular movies than with the intersection of publicity and violence. And until we find a way to curtail access to guns, he says, the slaughter will continue.

When are Liberals going to wake up to the reality that naming a place a “Gun Free Zone” tells the criminal or criminally insane element in this country they have free reign to fulfill their fantasy of killing people without fear of being shot or killed by an armed American Citizen. They know it will take the Police time,after someone calls them, to get to the scene & can probably disappear before the Police get there. In the last ten years almost all of the mass killing sprees have happened in “Gun Free zones”. If just one person, other than the shooter, had carried a concealed weapon into that theater the number of people killed or wounded would probably have been drastically reduced, but the MSM doesn’t want you to know that as it doesn’t fit their agenda. This particular nut case is highly intelligent & probably could have killed far more people with a homemade Improvised Explosive Device, which would be very easy to build. Police Officers are allowed to carry their weapons in these “Gun Free Zones” & unfortunately some of them are criminals, although most are not. A Citizen that takes the time & expense to get a CCW Permit & become proficient in the use of a handgun is no more dangerous than a Police Officer that also carries a weapon. Armed Citizens stop crimes every day & even the FBI now affirms that fact. There is no such thing as a “Gun Free Zone” as criminals ignore laws or signs & will bring weapons into those zones anyway.

Ebert is an idiot. Decades of watching liberal propaganda has made him delusional to reality.

I wonder if he believes making access to drugs decreases drug use or if we should go back to prohibition because drunk drivers kill someone everyday. The solution to any problem is simply banning the device, eh? Just because you are equipped with something doesn’t mean you’re going to use it in the absolute malicious way possible. Does Roger Ebert have knives in his kitchen? Does he have a gas stove?

Liberals need to realize that with guns, as with anything else – simply having the equipment to commit a horrendous tragedy does not mean you WILL commit one! AND that that equipment can PREVENT such tragedies.

In NYC Mayor Bloomberg wants a complete and total gun ban. I would ask him if that applies to his security staff. No? So basically what he’s saying is that I have to walk around waiting to become a defenseless victim but because he is the high and mighty mayor his life is more important. This is liberal elitism, pure and simple.