Summary

The lowest current estimates of International Banks derivatives meltdown crisis is $1.4 Quadrillion. $1.4 Quadrillion is roughly (a) 40 times the worlds stock market; (b) 10 times the value of every stock and every bond on the planet; (c) 23 times world GDP.

So imagine the world derivatives bubble bursts tomorrow; that will reap a financial tsunami that wipes out initially all the banks; but the money the banks have been using to play these derivative casino bets; was not their own money; but the banks clients money. So all the worlds stock markets [ in terms of all the financial transactions, debts and credits on their balance sheets ]; every stock and every bond on the planet; and the entire worlds GDP: BANKRUPT.

At this point a massive wealth transfer will occur.

“What are written about in history books is wealth destructions but they’re not really, they’re wealth transfers, if you look at them the way I do, which is that before and after the Wymar hyperinflation experience they are just as many acres of farmland and buildings around and people and productive property plant and equipment. But what happened was a lot of people got wiped out and who owned those things changed hands rather violently and dramatically.” – Chris Martinson; Why Smart Money is so Nervous

Two Wealth Transfer options:

Masonic War is Peace Wealth Transfer: Instead of 50% of the world belonging to the 1%; 90% of the world belongs to them. One percent elite become overt In Your Face Warlord slavemasters; and the rest of the 99% overt slaves. The treatment of slaves, whether they are allowed to live or procreate; or how they are to be slaughtered, is totally dependent on their Warlord slavemasters goodwill.

Ecology of Peace wealth transfer: all bankrupt banks; corporations are nationalized. All individuals owning property greater than the EoP allotted ration footprint have their property nationalized. Families who agree to cooperate by signing EoP cooperator statements; are granted confiscated nationalized property sufficient for their family to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; to engage in the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.

Ecology of Peace suggestion options for your consideration for the international collective implementation of Ecology of Wealth Transfer Option; with regard to conversion of the Economy to anEcology of Peace Sustainable Economy; and mitigating impending Deutsche Bank Systemic Breakdown Might Start a Chain Reaction Collapse.

The lowest current estimates of International Banks derivatives meltdown crisis is $1.4 Quadrillion.

$1.4 Quadrillion is roughly (a) 40 times the worlds stock market; (b) 10 times the value of every stock and every bond on the planet; (c) 23 times world GDP.

So imagine the world derivatives bubble bursts tomorrow; that will reap a financial tsunami that wipes out initially all the banks; but the money the banks have been using to play these derivative casino bets; was not their own money; but the banks clients money. So all the worlds stock markets [ in terms of all the financial transactions, debts and credits on their balance sheets ]; every stock and every bond on the planet; and the entire worlds GDP: BANKRUPT.

At this point a massive wealth transfer will occur.

“What are written about in history books is wealth destructions but they’re not really, they’re wealth transfers, if you look at them the way I do, which is that before and after the Wymar hyperinflation experience they are just as many acres of farmland and buildings around and people and productive property plant and equipment. But what happened was a lot of people got wiped out and who owned those things changed hands rather violently and dramatically.” – Chris Martinson; Why Smart Money is so Nervous

Two Wealth Transfer options:

Masonic War is Peace Wealth Transfer: Instead of 50% of the world belonging to the 1%; 90% of the world belongs to them. One percent elite become overt In Your Face Warlord slavemasters; and the rest of the 99% overt slaves. The treatment of slaves, whether they are allowed to live or procreate; or how they are to be slaughtered, is totally dependent on their Warlord slavemasters goodwill.

“How can you win a cyberwarfare battle if it takes you five and a half years to recognize and staff an office? It reminds me of a story of a friend of mine who worked so-called upgrading a Tomahawk missile electronics. He upgraded it from one obsolete system to another obsolete system. It just seems as though perhaps we have too many generals and not enough high school kids and college kids; who can put this stuff together; and recognize A. that there is a problem; and B. that it needs to be addressed; sooner, not five and a half years later. The stand up of a new domain; the standup of a new capability is a hugely difficult issue inside of a culture; absent something like a Pearl Harbouror a 911. So probably the biggest mistake that we made was that we threw all sorts of cash at it. So people were naming some of their kids after cyber, just to get some of that money. We ended up with a lot of people in charge; and all of them had no votes; nobody had a yes vote. I recall when I accepted the job at Strategic Command I had 19 people in the Department of Defense who thought they were in charge of me; who thought they were my direct boss. You can’t get anything done that way. So we were pretty brutal in getting that cleaned up; and getting that straight. But there are all sorts of other places where we have the same kind of problem. Some of this is this country and the way we do business; and the incentive structure. Some of it is our own fault and the bureaucracy. If you bottom up something then you are never going to break out; you are going to incrementally improve. If you take someone from the top coming down to actually breakout and do something fundamentally different. The system is not tolerant of that quite frankly. They’ll eat their young. Its a very difficult thing to do particularly if everybody hasn’t had their identity or property stolen; then they go ‘why do i have to do this?’. I am doing just fine the way I am. …. Don’t let this desire for a unique vocabulary be taken over because the young lance corporal that is out there in the field, needs it to be as straight-forward as possible. They need to be able to speak the language. … we have to keep it simple; so that everyone that can or needs to use it, can use it. Inside the inner agency of government there is the question who should be in charge of it. …. In China; we can make sure they know when we are not happy. .. We have enough capability to do that. They may have a lot of money, but they are operating on a thinner margin than we are for too many of their people being unemployed. The more they get; the more dangerous things become. They have more unemployed than we have citizens. So that is a huge problem for them, so if they start slowing down their economic machine they have a lot of people that get out of work and it starts to get a significant problem for them. So there is more than one kind of tool to be used here. You don’t want to use them capriciously and you don’t want to use just economic tools. ….. Are we really going to get an opportunity for a peace dividend, so to speak? Where we all just go home for a couple of years and get better and all those types of things? Not likely? The demographics go against it. The world population demographics. The energy demographics. The water demographics. The food demographics. All are against it. … So we have a long term problem infront of us. The question is what do we want to be as a nation; as we look at that? … So the question is at this inflection point; which way do we want to go as a country; and more importantly which way do we want to take this country for our children; because that is the decision that we are really making? We have to think about that. Right now we are doing a budget drill; we are just trying to figure out; what we can afford with the money we have. The reality is that we ought to be doing an inward look here: what do we want to be and what do we want this country to be for our children? Because that is the more important question right now. …. Many people in our society have not had something stolen from them. So when you talk to them. I need you to give up some of your privacy so I can go and find these viruses. They say No. I don’t see the value in it. I don’t see why I would do that. Historically we are a nation that requires something like a Pearl Harbour before we get our act together and go after something and we are willing to give up.” — James E. Cartwright – Cyber Warfare and Special Ops: A General Weighs-In.

PNGInfo: Cree Indian Prophecy: Only when the last tree has died and the last river been poisoned; and the last fish caught; will we realize we cannot eat money. Vladimir de Thezier: Last Tree artpiece. Joseph Priestley Center: Bell Jar experiments. Guy McPherson: “If you think the economy is more important than the environment, try holding your breath while counting your money.

Other Peak Oil documentaries: Crash Course, Oil Smoke & Mirrors, Blind Spot, End of Suburbia, What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire, Peak Oil Solutions documentary: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil. Population: The Population Elephant in the Room: concludes: “The final graph is the outcome of the full simulation. It starts from our current population and shows the combined effects of a declining net birth rate and the excess death rate due to falling carrying capacity as described above. The goal of the model has been met: it has achieved a sustainable world population of one billion by the year 2082. The human cost of such an involuntary population rebalancing is, of course, horrific. Based on this model we would experience an average excess death rate of 100 million per year every year for the next 75 years to achieve our target population of one billion by 2082. The peak excess death rate would happen in about 20 years, and would be about 200 million that year. To put this in perspective, WWII caused an excess death rate of only 10 million per year for only six years.”

Ecology of Peace De-industrialization and Depopulation:

EoP submissions regarding orderly and humane deindustrialization and de-population; can be found in among others: EoP NWO Options: EoP Axis Admin: Ft Bragg [PDF]: Revolution in Military Ethics: Defining just and unjust actions in war and military conflict: the operative question: Whom should the military kill? Who should be removed from the planetary genepool, how should they be removed, how many should be removed, by whom and when should they be removed?

.

[II] EoP Wealth Transfer Options to shut down Casino Ponzi Economy:

EoP Axis Nationalization of Individuals Property:

All individuals owning property greater than the EoP allotted ecofootprint ration – as detailed under: Ecology of Peace New Economy Sustainability Definition paragraphs – will have their property nationalized.

All Banks from Bank of International Settlements; Inter-American Development Bank; APRACA: Asia-Pacific Rural to the Agriculture Credit Association; to traded and privately owned corporations shall be nationalized. The Derivatives Market will go through bankruptcy proceedings and both the Derivatives Market and Stock Exchanges will be shut down.

The ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace social contract shall be removed and replaced with Ecology of Peace clauses that restrict all the worlds citizens of all races, religions and classes to procreating and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits; relating with others in accordance to fully informed consenting agreements; and violaters shall be eliminated from the planetary genepool. For more info on transforming the planetary economy to a sustainable economy: see: Community Solution: Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Doug Tompkins: The Next Economy: Transitions from Globalization to Eco-Localization.

The EoP Economy shall be based upon already mined gold and ultimately a resource mix based currency standard; where all lending / borrowing and/or bartering is to be limited to consumption and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources below Ecological Carrying Capacity limits.

Banks and/or Corporations may avoid coercive nationalization by voluntarily choosing to engage in the conversion of their corporations to EoP cooperative corporations; by giving employees the opportunity to vote whether they wish to (a) remain with the corporation and convert their former corporation to be managed in accordance to cooperative ownership principles and agree to sign anEcology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration; (b) leave the corporation in accordance with with six months salary retrenchment package.

All nationalized corporations shall undergo the same employee vote process. Only individuals who have signed Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declarationmay be considered for Cooperative Management positions.

All Corporate Pensions for all employees who have not yet retired; whether they sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration, vote to remain with the corporation or be retrenched; are immediately cancelled. All Corporate Pensions for individuals who have already retired shall be notified that such pensions shall be cancelled within twelve months.

All corporate employees, including current or former pension holders; who do not own any property; who sign an Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declarationshall be provided with an EoP allotted ecofootprint ration of nationalized property; for their use; to enable them to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; and engage with neighbours into local food production cooperatives; to begin the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.

Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Energy Facilities:

All IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency member states are to immediately draw up a report detailing how they commit to the decommission of all their Nuclear Weapons and Energy facilities; within five years.

World Coal Association: All member corporations are to immediately draw up a report detailing how they intend to support the orderly termination and closure of all coal mining and energy production with a Production Footprint above ecological renewable/non renewable carrying capacity limits; i.e. all future coal exploitation and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources must be limited to below Ecological Carrying Capacity limits.

Breeding & Consumption Crimes of Aggression:

“Any individual who is found guilty of advocating on behalf of, legislating, enforcing, or obeying any – cultural, religious, common, statutory, constitutional, or international – ‘scarcity combatant’ social contract; which enables or advocates on behalf of human procreation, consumption or production of resources that transgress ecological carrying capacity limits, is guilty of the ‘crime of aggression act of war’.”

Crimes of Aggression Acts of War Convictions & Sentencing:

Consumption Violation Sentences:

Individuals found negligently guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish their excess consumed products; and provide community service labour; to the extent of the infraction.

Individuals found intentionally guilty of violating consumption social contract limits; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.

Procreation Violation Sentences:

Individuals found guilty of negligently violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to be permanently sterilized.

Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating procreation social contract limits; would be required to (a) relinquish said child for adoption – if wanted to be adopted by a family – and be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed; (b) if no adoptive family is found; parents and child are to be given their choice as to how they prefer to be humanely executed.

EoP Axis Nation State Employees:

Every employee from the President down to the school janitor who is an employee of a federal, state, city or local government; is given one month to sign their Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration; and submit it to appointed Federal, National and LocalEcology of Peace Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration Ombudsman.

All State employees who refuse to sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration are retrenched; with six months salary retrenchment package.

All Government Pensions for all employees who have not yet retired; whether they sign Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration or not; are immediately cancelled. All Government Pensions for individuals who have already retired shall be notified in writing; that such pensions shall be cancelled within twelve months.

All Government employees, including current or former pension holders; who do not own any property; who sign an Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration shall be provided with an EoP allotted ecofootprint ration of nationalized property; for their use; to enable them to sustain their most basic shelter, food and water needs; and engage with neighbours into local food production cooperatives; to begin the process of rebuilding local cooperative tribal responsible freedom communities.

Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration.

A citizen’s signed Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration will declare that the particular citizen understands and legally agrees to the following:

If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits and consequently Nation States failure to (a) avoid resource depletion and sustainable protection of national renewable and non-renewable resources for other species and future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; are the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’.

I request – and commit to support – the President and all supporting Political Party leaders; to officially and publicly begin legal International negotiations – by adopting any of the Ecology of Peace New World Order Negotiations social contract options used individually or in select combination or collectively; or other more suitable options – to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that shall (i) abolish the root ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’; and (ii) replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that require all of the worlds citizens from all races, classes and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; and anyone convicted of breeding and/or consumption violations shall be eliminated from the planetary genepool.

If I am committed to honourable discourse; and I am giving someone else the benefit of the doubt that they are committed to honourable truthseeking discussion:

I clarify my preferences; to enable people being communicated to, to clearly know what I want; and whether they are willing to engage me in entering into an agreement; to help me get what I want; and reciprocally whether I can help them to get what they may want.

I always respond to verbal and written correspondence, with a sincere honest response. If I don’t have time to respond; I inform them by when they can expect a response.

I sincerely and actively listen to the evidence from any individual, irrespective of their political ideology – i.e. right wing to left wing – religion, race or culture. Active listening means you verify that your interpretation of their statements is accurate; before concluding that you have ‘heard their argument’.

I focus on simplifying the issue discussed, using as much as possible descriptive words; as opposed to abstract concepts. If or where I include reference to abstract concepts; I am willing to define my meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance.

I evaluate their argument based upon the evidence they present, not their race, religion or political ideology; etc.

If I am not convinced by the quality of their evidence on any particular issue; I am willing to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and cooperate if they are willing to engage in cooperative truthseeking to get better quality evidence; so that a stronger beyond reasonable doubt conclusion can be drawn on the particular issue in dispute.

I remain in the conversation until we find agreement; so as to support each other on other issues that we do agree upon, which are based upon more conclusive buck stops here evidence.

If or where sincere conflict arises in the discussion about the issue in dispute; I am committed to remaining in the conversation and finding a way to resolve the conflict, by allowing myself, them or both of us to get over our anger; as opposed to requiring them to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons. Once the emotional steam has been released through the conflict resolution process; both parties will find themselves in a more calm neutral space where the truthseeking conversation can proceed.

If either of us decide that we are unable to resolve the conflict between us:

If none of us are employed by the State and/or legally obligated to help each other on the particular issue of preference in dispute; we honourably terminate discussions and approach others for help to get what we respectively want.

If one or both of us are employed by the State and/or an organization or profession legally obligated to provide support to enable resolution of the particular requested preference; we cooperatively refer the matter to an honourable discourse truthseeking arbitrator for impartial dispute resolution.

If at any point during discussion; or arbitration proceedings; their evidence proves any of my evidence for any of my ideological, racial or religious working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; I love reason and logic more than my ego-identity and hence I am willing to publicly change my mind, on that particular subject and amend my ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided; and if necessary to apologize.

Naturally anyone who refuses – without reasonable justification – to engage in aforementioned honourable discourse; is not remotely interested in peace, anti-war, or non-violent root cause problem solving of socio-economic resource war conflict; and depending on the circumstances; may consciously or unconsciously be providing their informed consent justification for the issue in dispute to be resolved by means of violence. Although honourable discourse would recommend that they be consciously made aware of how their refusal to engage in honourable discourse root cause problem solving of the issue in dispute; demonstrates their lack of commitment and sincerity to non-violent root cause problem solving.

Deception Communication Crimes of Aggression:

Fully Informed Consensual Relating Violation Sentences:

Individuals found guilty of negligently violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be required to attend and graduate from a Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ communication values class; where they would learn how to communicate their preferences and relate to others in accordance to Fully Informed Consenting Communication values; and sign a Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration to graduate.

Individuals found guilty of intentionally violating ‘Fully Informed Consenting Honourable Discourse’ as part of their inter-relating agreements; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide; (b) be granted the opportunity to say goodbye to their loved ones and (c) be eliminated from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide.

Ecology of Peace New Economy Sustainability Definition:

A Sustainable society practices Sustainable Procreation and Sustainable Natural Resource Utilization Behaviour; i.e. all of its citizens consume and procreate below carrying capacity. SustainableNatural Resource Utilization Behaviour behaviour involves the utilization of renewable natural resources—water, cropland, pastureland, forests, and wildlife—exclusively, which can be depleted only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are replenished by Nature. The utilization of non-renewable natural resources (NNR’s)—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, is not sustainable[1].

Carrying Capacity Sustainability: I=PAT Equation:

For activities to be genuinely sustainable it must be possible for them to continue indefinitely. The impact of humanity on the environment and the demands that people place on the resources available on the planet can be summarised by what is known as the Ehrlich or IPAT equation, I=PAT. I = impact on the environment or demand for resources, P = population size, A = affluence and T = technology. The two most important conclusions deriving from this IPAT footprint[2] relationship are that: (i) the Earth can support only a limited number of people, at a certain level of affluence, in a sustainable manner; and (ii) Population and Consumption must be reduced to below carrying capacity.

Carrying Capacity aka Biocapacity Limits:

“The maximum number of individuals that can be supported sustainably by a given environment is known as its ‘carrying capacity’. Worldwide the total amount of biologically productive land and sea amounts to 12 billion global hectares (gha); or 1.8 gha each if divided by 6.7 billion each. Guerrylla Laws are drawn up in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan[3], who set aside 40% of their biologically productive to be returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes; then that means that the total amount of biologically productive carrying capacity land available to humans is 60% of 12 billion; which amounts to 7.2 billion gha total; or 60% of 1.8 gha, which is 1 gha each. Population factor is relevant, because the more humans there are, the less biologically productive land there is for everyone else. For example:

As noted, the more people there are; the less biologically productive land there is available for everyone else. According to the research of Paul Murtaugh, the procreation factor that should be added by ecology footprint organisations to their Consumption footprint calculators, is 20 per child. [Each Child increases a parent’s cumulative consumption footprint by factor of 20[4]]

An individuals IPAT footprint is a result of: (A) Consumption Footprint multiplied by (B) Procreation Factor (Every child increases 20 Child Factor). If their IPAT footprint is below carrying capacity limits, they are an Eco-Innocent Leaver; if their IPAT footprint is above carrying capacity limits, they are a Scarcity Combatant Taker.

Total Footprint = Consumption x Procreation Factor.

To work out your Consumption footprint; you will need to use a Consumption Footprint calculator. Current online footprint calculators: Global Footprint Network[5] (copy available at Earth Day[6]; Center for Sustainable Economy[7]; EcoCampus[8]. See more at Global Footprint’s Application Standards[9], where they detail how their calculators calculate Consumption footprints. The quiz will ask you various questions about your consumption habits, and provide you with a final consumption footprint in global hectares which is your ‘consumption footprint’. For the purposes of this calculation; avoid footprint calculator quizzes that do not provide you with your final gha consumption footprint amount, such as for example: World Wildlife Fund’s footprint calculator[10] or Stanford International Students[11] (which is excellent and has great detail; but does not provide you with a final footprint in gha terms). Multiply your consumption footprint gha amount by your Procreation Factor: the number of children you have procreated multiplied by 20. The total amount is your Total Footprint.