FACTS which contradict what is taught in the universities and which even run counter to the assumptions made by critics of misandry.

Sunday, April 6, 2014

The Origin of Widow Self-Immolation (Sati, or, Suttee) in India & Its Relation to Husbandicide

It has been 2,000 years that the origin of the Indian practice
of Sati (or Suttee) was first reported in Western scholarly writings as having
arisen to institute a disincentive for husbandicide, in order to counter the
widespread of murder of husbands by wives.

***

EXCERPT: Secret poisoning seems to have been a common crime
in India from the earliest times. Few of our readers are probably aware that
the Suttee, which we have taken such trouble to suppress, was originally
introduced (certainly before the time of Strabo [64/63 BC – c. AD 24], who
lived at the commencement of our era) as a check upon the practice common
amongst Indian women of poisoning their husbands. Passing over seventeen
centuries we have the evidence of Captain Hamilton, who traded in India between
1688 and 1723 (quoted by Dr. Chevers) that the same system was then in
existence:

“In Canara (he observes) there are several customs peculiar
to itself, and many of them are spread abroad to remote countries. Here it was that the custom of wives burning on the same pile
with their deceased husbands had its beginning. It is reported that, before the
Brahmins invented this law, poison was so well known and practised that the
least quarrel that happened between a married couple cost the husband his life,
and this law put a great stop to it; and now custom so far prevails that, if
any faint-hearted lady has not courage enough to accompany her spouse to the
other world, she is forthwith shaved and disregarded, and obliged to serve all
her husband’s family in all kinds of drudgery.”

[“IV. – A Manual of Medical Jurisprudence for India.” in The
British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review or Quarterly Journal of Practical
Medicine and Surgery. Vol. XLIX. January-April, 1872. London, J. A. Churchill,
New Burlington Street, 1872.]

***

EXCERPT: When [Dr. Bell] stated that the Hindoo women still
sacrificed their lives on the funeral piles of their husbands, he should have
added, had he had any decent regard for truth, that fewer instances of such
victims now occur throughout all India, than many of ourselves can recollect of
wives in England being burnt at the stake for the murder of their husbands, and
for coining; that the Hindoo custom never was a law, but only connived at to
check the horrible, (and in all countries too common) crime of husbandicide, and to inure paradise to the voluntary
victim: for I insist that the practice is both voluntary and rare;
whereas, the wife with us suffers a cruel death, and is besides damned to all
eternity!

According to Diodorus the practice of sati started
because Indians married for love, unlike the Greeks who favoured marriages
arranged by the parents. When inevitably many of these love marriages turned
sour, the woman would often poison the husband and find a new lover. To end
these murders, a law was therefore instituted that the widow should either join
her husband in death or live in perpetual widowhood. (Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca historica, 19.34.1-6).
Modern historians believe Diodorus' source for this episode was the eyewitness
account of the now lost historian Hieronymus of Cardia. Hieronymus' explanation
of the origin of sati appears to be his own composite, created from a
variety of Indian traditions and practices to form a moral lesson upholding
traditional Greek values (A. B. Bosworth. The
Legacy of Alexander: Politics, Warfare, and Propaganda under the Successors.
Oxford University Press, 2002, pp 174-187).

***

For a look into the mind of a serial husband-killer in modern India, see: