On May 19, 7:05am, mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost (matthew green) wrote:
-- Subject: re: port-sparc64/38949 (under emul_netbsd32 on sparc64 some appli
| hmm, what happens if you don't have /emul/netbsd32? ie, just copy
| those /bin/ksh or /bin/sh files somewhere and run them as is.
|
| /emul/netbsd32 is probably going to be going away as being used.
| i haven't really thought deeply about this, but, i don't want to
| keep two methods of 32 bit support around and the new one is much
| better, so it's likely this will disappear.
|
Static binaries are not supported then. Not that I will miss them but...
Linux provides both.
how does /emul/netbsd32 affect static binaries?
.mrg.