”We need a witness to our lives. There's a billion people on the planet, what does any one life really mean? But in a marriage, you're promising to care about everything. The good things, the bad things, the terrible things, the mundane things, all of it, all of the time, every day. "

”We need a witness to our lives. There's a billion people on the planet, what does any one life really mean? But in a marriage, you're promising to care about everything. The good things, the bad things, the terrible things, the mundane things, all of it, all of the time, every day. "

The hamsters were unharmed. The researcher's brain, not so much. Then again, it was probably bent in the first place.

File this one in the nonsensical artist fiche. I'm not sure he actually achieved anything more than a randomizer could have at a fraction of the price. OTOH I would not be watching/listening to it! Much prefer the cat one - that at least told me something about the guy....

I'm pretty sure the hamster thing was intended as a joke. It's a spoof on some of the algorithmic-composition things that some people spend a lot of time noodling around with. Some people were trying to pursuade the author to submit it to the Journal of Irreproducable Results. Plus, there's a running joke in the Synth-DIY community about deriving MIDI inputs from non-musical items -- see the MIDI pants.