Watching the media, it is now finally a “close race”, while until now, it has been sure win for HRC. But on social media we have been tracking the truth, the American voter.. who came out to stop the decay, the surrender to statism, mediocrity and the east. For one more roar of the Lion and MAGA!! Long ago we knew what happened today. The Lighthouse Keeper Calls this incredible Race! Americans now have a chance to claim their country back. Mr. Trump… don’t let us down, we know you’ve grown this year as you met the country… and the American people, as well as their allies far away, starting here in Israel, stand with you!!! (the media will take a long time to tel you this result yet) First I must gloat in a bad person’s loss (and I don’t mean Qaddafi)… Not this time you didn’t… Hillary, not this time you didn’t you arrogant hollow “nasty woman”. One day a woman will be President of the USA I am sure, and I hope, like the Iron Lady in England, she will be an honor to her nation.. but it won’ t be you… despite the fact [...][Continue Reading...]

Remember this euphoria in 2008? Obama the messiah was here to save us all, and the media had everyone drinking the Kool Aid. No one was more hurt and betrayed than poorer black voters. They came out for him in astronomical numbers. From Obama dreams of no more mortgage, and free gas, to bribing voters with smartphones… it was insane. (By the way, this lady realized she had been duped, and came out against Obama later on) As usual, the Democrats forget about the inner city until the next election cycle, but that doesn’t mean they don’t do anything that affects them in between. They do indeed, they pass the same old nice-sounding socialist policies that continue to impoverish America, ship its economy overseas, and it hurts no one more than the working class and the folks in the inner city. Each time they are told to believe rich people are the problem (the same rich people that fund the Democratic campaigns, none more than Hillary’s), and that they will “invest” in jobs. The government can’t invest in jobs, it can just destroy them. Free people willing to risk their time, sweat and capital create jobs, and where they [...][Continue Reading...]

For any people left at this point who don’t care about perjury, corruption, obstruction of justice, empty scripted hollow cores, socialism, and/or general robotic qualities, or do but still need a little push to be able to back Donald Trump, I am happy to present the ultimate and irrefutable proof, that you would be in pretty awesome company. Hillary had to bring in Jay z in order to bring in a crowd at her events. He “sang” songs whose lyrics I cannot repeat here, and no he wasn’t in a locker room being secretly taped; he was unapologetically blaring it out. Same guy whose on video some years back hitting a girl. So much for Hillary and women’s rights and lewd language being so offensive to her and all her female supporters. In any event, wanted to show that though Trump does not need the star power to fill his rallies, he certainly has his fair share of famous supporters, with quality over quantity being the name of the game. This is not by any means a list of celebrities who endorse Trump, but rather a list of those on my approved list, which are people who not only are [...][Continue Reading...]

Earlier today, FBI Director James Comey sent a letter to leading Republican and Democratic congressmen, stating what has been reported as “re-opening” the investigation into the Hillary Email server. The letter sent by Comey below: Coverage since this was announced has been furious, and the speculation rampart. The mainstream media has tried to focus on the fact that it is unthinkable for the FBI to inject itself into an election a mare 11 days out from an election. Others are noting that for Director Comey to come out and do this, after the criticism he received in July, must mean there are very significant revelations in the new evidence which do not bode well for Hillary. Rush Limbaugh, who has excellent instincts, suggested that this may all be smoke and mirrors in order to deflect attention to the Wikileaks revelations (mostly coming from the Hillary campaign chair John Podesta emails, I have an “in progress” piece on that) that are just now finally to get some traction in the mainstream media. Rush usually knows what he is talking about, and this very well may be, but I am inclined to think something else is going on here. In [...][Continue Reading...]

(the list of revelations following the introduction will continue to grow from my massive notes on the emails – so far these are relatively few). The public releases that Wikileaks has provided as par as the Podesta emails are an incredible and unprecedented glimpse into the corruption and collusion that are the establishment, and specifically the Democratic political part machine. However, a major factor that has protected Hillary and her campaign (other than the obvious leftist bias one) has gone largely unnoticed. It has gone unnoticed because media outlets don’t like to call themselves “lazy”. Megan Kelley on Fox did mention this factor briefly, but basically it requires a lot of of work and time to go through these released emails to find newsworthy pieces. It requires more time to then understand their context, and investigate the background and the issues being discussed. Definitely harder than a released Trump “sex tape”. Furthermore, the fact that the releases have been coming in batches makes it even worse. It means all the relevant searches you have done previously on a certain matter (for example you searched for all emails containing the word “Netanyahu”) are not definitive and have to be done [...][Continue Reading...]

The Lighthouse Keeper’s take on the Donald Trump Access Hollywood Tape that was recently leaked, and subsequently pummeled his poll numbers. This is an analysis of tape, the context in which it was leaked (after being held for 11 years by NBC and Access Hollywood only to be released by them (and the Washington Post) within a month of the General Election, and coinciding with the Wikileaks release of Hillary Clinton confidant John Podesta’s emails). It would always have generated some ratings, at any time during those 11 years, from the very next day, to any time after that including any time during Trump’s primary race and up until now as the GOP candidate in the general election campaign. It was however, appropriately not considered newsworthy as so much of the off air and off the record material the networks routinely collect during their day-to-day business. Until Hillary Clinton really needed it. This of course, is a lengthy talk, as opposed to my usual in-depth article; trying out a new medium, and depending on reception and circumstances, I will do more talks and/or videos…and after some practice undoubtedly they’re quality will improve! With all the scandal, demonizing and bashing [...][Continue Reading...]

Social Post: By the way, regardless of whom you back, like, dislike or disagree with, be very certain that any of the headlines and posts that I see flying around stating that Trump attempted to intimidate or menace hillary by following around or standing over her are not only flat-out inaccurate, but a clear sign that whoever is telling you this (and actually believes it) did not watch the debate. But most people didn’t and these type of headlines carry the election. Anyone who watched it saw Hillary (in an unfortunately brilliantly choreographed strategy) time and time again get up and walk over to Trump’s side (Trump stayed on his side the whole time). She would walk right passed him ignoring him and then face the public while giving him her back. She knew this would create the desired effect, the cameras facing her would catch him (obviously bigger and taller) awkwardly behind her. What they don’t show is that without exception, Trump is standing on his side, next to his chair/stool. Most of the “bad” images and angles are from the very first time hillary did this. Trump was visibly uncomfortable being so close to hillary, but felt he [...][Continue Reading...]

Social Post: You guys ever hear, “hey, mind your tongue, there are ladies present”… or “watch your language in front of the lady..” ? Back before we all got confused and castrated… This would have been a common thing to hear in the rare case of a man speaking lewdly in front a lady. Today, while the latter is extremely common, the former in response not so much. In any case, there was a reason that saying didn’t go.. “hey, mind your manners in front of me, another guy.. lest I get offended”. Guys, as anyone who has lived on earth knows, can speak lewdly in private to each other. exaggerate, Bragg, “shoot the shit”… some locker room banter. not all men of course, but most in our society, and some in different degrees and styles than others. women some may be surprised, can also speak in ways they would not want repeated in public. and that is the point… public vs private. We speak in front of our elders, our young, our men, our women, our rabbis and priests, and our high school buddies differently. very differently, as it should be. comrade-dists don’t like differences i know.. but our [...][Continue Reading...]

It’s been 15 summers since much of the western world realized that it was under attack from an enemy others had long known. Since then, frequency of such attacks (though usually less “grandiose”) across the western world have drastically increased, actually becoming commonplace. The impact their perpetrators and supporters have long-term on western civilization dwarves that of the 9/11 Attacks. Rather than having made progress on that front at the least (since we sure haven’t in anything else), the reverse is true. Today’s western leadership cannot even name this enemy, even though the administration in place at the time identified it immediately (or “almost” identified it). At the time, the USA and the western world was destined to be fortunate indeed, to have had the steady hands of George W Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld at the helm of the free world, and those of Rudy Giuliani guiding the city under attack. The next generations of leaders, though quick to second guess, criticize and claim what they and their constituents are or ought to be “entitled” to… are shadows of these men, who denied the enemy the immediate panic he desired, steadied the ship, identified friend and foe, and lunged out our [...][Continue Reading...]

We remember our fallen Warriors of Israel today. We often say that they laid down their lives for us, but we must remember, they laid nothing down, nor would they kneel or run. They lost their lives fighting, charging forward gallantly… fighting for Victory, and for all of Us. Our heroes are too many, thank Gd most of them have lived, fighting like lions the victory they sought achieved. As one of our commanders once famously told his victorious men as they reached the waters of the Suez, “We stared death in the eyes, and it turned its gaze”. But so many, far too many, have paid the ultimate price, bravely, seemingly stoic, and as a matter-of-fact, they fought for Israel, for every Jew around the world, they did their duty. But they did not go gently nor willingly, as our foes well know, not wishing to give up all the beauty of life and the promise of the future while so often still in the flower of youth. Gladly however, our heroes paid this price that their brothers next to them live, that their mothers and daughters back home know safety and freedom. I hear a lot talk about [...][Continue Reading...]

Lending Club, among other players in the industry such as Prosper, is one of the great success stories in the peer-to-peer revolution, or the “share economy”. The idea is simple enough, the internet is ideal for cutting out middlemen, so why not banks? In the idealized (and fictitious) scenario, a bank is an institution that takes and safeguards deposits from people in exchange for an interest rate, say 2%, and then uses those deposits to make loans to people and businesses that need them at a higher interest, say for example 6%. The Bank is thus simply an intermediary that facilitates a market in which some people have money they wish to save, and others need loans to invest or purchase goods and services with. Lenders and borrowers. The margin between the two rates, 6 and 2 percent respectively, is the gross profit of the bank, in this case 4%. And of course, out of that 4%, the bank presumably has to pay its many expenses such as rent, insurance, marketing, staff salaries (a really high-tech secure vault like in the movies) and the like. And finally, like in any business, if there is some profit leftover after all these [...][Continue Reading...]

Responding to a question on social media, I briefly addressed this issue, and reproduce it here. Namely the issue of the cost and economics of the well known campaign promise by Donald Trump to, as President, expel the 12 or so million illegal aliens currently residing within the USA. It is a very good question because once passed the inciting rhetoric of the issue, the media has largely presented the idea of deporting all or great part of America’s illegal alien population as physically and economically virtually impossible. As usual, this declaration is made a priori and without basis, to be accepted as fact. So, let’s take an actual look at the issue. As a preface it must be stated that the cost is nearly irrelevant. First of all, although I do not explain it here, nor have I fully elsewhere yet, I think this issue is the most important currently in the western world, and the execution of one of these deemed “impossible” or “unrealistic” demographic changes is one of the few hopes left to the western world. I will hopefully address that elsewhere. Secondly, cost saving calculations are somewhat meaningless when at the expense of the destruction of [...][Continue Reading...]

Unfortunately, I have not been able to write much commentary on the GOP race recently, though there was plenty of material I wished to discuss. But here we are Super Tuesday, and it has been interesting to say the least. I will try to very briefly recap some of the thoughts I either had or conveyed on social media. It was clear to me from the start of this over-packed primary season, that Ted Cruz was the man that most correctly understood conservative values, capitalism, and the geopolitical challenges facing America. He also had that Hispanic name which, we have been force-fed since 2012 is necessary for a Republican to win the White House today. But unlike Rubio, none of flip-flopping and leftist positions on certain issues. I commented on these things more fully back in an article early on at the outset of the Trump campaign. In that article, it was correctly and quickly perceived that the raw never that Trump had hit had to do with immigration mostly, and with a suffocating culture of political correctness and “whininess” in the second. And though Trump is far from a true conservative ideologue, this things are powerful enough that he [...][Continue Reading...]

Hey Syed Farook, this is how men have a shootout with cops while wearing armor and donning assault weapons. Sure, they didn’t shoot dozens of unnamed innocents since they weren’t disgruntled Health Dept, registered Democrat, Islamist Jihadi employees, and just wanted some bank cash, but when the armed police came, they lasted way longer and did way better. Back in this infamous robbery in North Hollywood back in 1997 (in a scene scene seemingly right out of “Heat” at the time), it took a couple of really brave officers out dozens and dozens to finally end it, and some heavier weapons taken from a nearby gun store. For all their planning, bags of ammunition, pipe bombs, long and short guns, Farook and his wife were easily overcome without loss of life as soon as the armed police confronted them. It was the gun-controlled and gun free Christmas party attendees that were at their mercy unfortunately. But in all fairness, in France, Farook and his wife, would have probably seized the government. In Israel, they would have been dead within a minute, and in Texas, within seconds.[Continue Reading...]

Incredible… and not surprising. This video, apparently taking place in Australia, has been getting quite a bit of publicity on social media recently, as another example of islamist intolerance, but the most telling fact is likely to go unnoticed. The only reason a lone muslim dares attack a Jew (who by the way, nicely and easily subdued him on his own) among a crowd of Jews… is because he trusts in their values. He knows he is safe. Safe among the highly observant Jews, and safe thereafter in the hands of the civilized Australian police. Reversing the situation is unthinkable. Not only would a Jew not go scream insanities at a bunch of highly religious muslims, but if he did he would be likely beaten to death or near death (depending what country we are in and what if any police consequences there would be) by the mob. And this is a microcosm of the conflict at large… they understand the West, and use their knowledge of us and our values to their advantage, and we refuse to understand them and what they are and want. We are losing at a game we don’t even accept we are playing. Note: [...][Continue Reading...]

It has now been over week since the November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks. One of my initial reactions, was to criticise the typically shortsighted Western media coverage of the attacks, which were typically incorrectly jumping to conclusions about the source and objectives of the attack. They all started their “analysis” by presuming that France was “elected” as a target for this attack by the current Western euphemism for a boogeyman, ISIS or ISIL, in retaliation to some policy or combination of policies that France has applied externally and/or internally. As I wrote subsequent to the attack: Nothing could be further from the truth. No one “picked” France. The reason there are from 100 to 150 murdered people in Paris in a series of violent terrorist attacks in the last couple of days is because France and Paris are full of Muslims. To be more precise, France is full of Muslims and still has many non Muslims. This is the simple truth. And the more that the substantial non Muslim population placates and appeases the Muslim population, the more attacks there will be. France is at the very forefront of Muslim and Arab appeasement, and has been so for decades. This [...][Continue Reading...]

Watching coverage of the latest carnage the West suffered at the hands of Muslim terrorists is even more troubling than the terrorist acts themselves. This is so because the coverage only indicates that there will be much more death in the future. The coverage mostly surrounds “Why Paris, why France?” .. and the “expert pundits” desperately try to depict France as actually hard-line in the anti-terror and anti-muslim spheres in order to show why the terrorists have chosen Paris as the target. So France is actually too extreme in its battle against Islam, and this is why it has been targeted; incredible! Nothing could be further from the truth. No one “picked” France. The reason there are from 100 to 150 murdered people in Paris in a series of violent terrorist attacks in the last couple of days is because France and Paris are full of Muslims. To be more precise, France is full of Muslims and still has many non Muslims. And to be even more thorough, France has many Muslims, many non Muslims and/or Muslims who substantially disagree (ie Sunni and Shiites). Countries with substantial Muslim populations, and substantial non Muslim (or substantial disagreeing Muslim) population will suffer [...][Continue Reading...]

Plenty of headlines have focused on the Iran deal, officially the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA, and they have mostly focused on various details of the plan or been overly focused on broad generalities; most either singing the agreement praises or damning it. Here I would like to take a step back and view it for its obvious implications. September 18, “adoption day”, has come and gone with the US congress unable to usher enough votes to stop the deal, despite their being vigorous opposition to it from both parties. The reason being, that as the Obama administration is fond of doing (and by now quite adept at it), it has once again skirted constitutional “formalities”, the rule of law, and the irksome system of checks and balances with its three independent branches of government. In the USA, according to the constitution, any international treaty must be ratified by two thirds of the senate (something which this agreement could not possibly achieve). The Obama administration termed this agreement an “executive agreement” in order to not fall under a treaty’s requirements. From the international perspective, these are just as binding as any other treaty, although by US law, an [...][Continue Reading...]

As we go into this first major GOP debate for the 2016 US Presidential Election, of course the wildcard that everyone is interested in is Trump. The GOP establishment is very worried about him, while at the same time much of the base is excited by him. Obviously he brings a freshness of direct talk that US politicians just don’t do anymore, but really is the essence of the controversial statements that he has said so far? There has been endless reporting and mostly misreporting about the “scandalous” statements that Trump has continuously given since his campaign has officially begun. Besides just speaking “directly and honestly”, unlike a politician, Trump touched a very raw nerve in the American people, in the GOP members specifically, and one that is taboo. Romney won 60% of the White vote in the 2012 election, and yet he was soundly defeated. Not the white male vote, not the white Christian vote, but the overall white vote. Sixty percent of the white vote not too long ago in America, meant a landslide victory. Now, it is not normally possible to get 70, 80 or 90 percent of the white vote… there are always some lefties. This [...][Continue Reading...]

(For a review of the parties and chart during the 2013 Election See here) Israel, today we vote… since we give a vote to a people at war with us and bent on our destruction (and in turn are called an apartheid state), the left has about a 22% advantage due the Arab vote. For the “right” to win in Israel, it does not need a majority of Jews to vote for it, it needs an overwhelming majority in order to overcome the near quarter population block that votes along with the Jewish left for the destruction of Israel… With Hamas on one border, ISIS nearing the gates on the other, instability all around, Jihadists (with western support) overturning stable and moderate Arab regimes, a US President openly disdainful of the single Jewish state in the world, and Muslim demographic overrunning much of the world making more and more countries unsafe for non muslims… any Israeli who votes left… deserves the fate that he is voting for. Please Remember, there is no choice between war and peace. There is a choice between dignity, justice and strength, and surrender, weakness and appeasement. There is a wide range of parties, enough to [...][Continue Reading...]