On 18 December 2012 07:52, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> wrote:
> However, as long as these anti-JS users insist on using a tool that does
> not support JavaScript, even when other viable options exist, then they are
> in the "want" versus "need" category, and I do not personally believe that
> WCAG 2 or any legislated requirement for equitable access is being ignored
> or trampled upon. (But, as the kids say today, "haters are gonna hate")
There are no anti-JS users here; no haters. Just people who are trying
their best to make the web a universal, inclusive web whom all people may
benefit from.
Kind regards, Harry