Home / Insights / FOR TRANSATLANTIC CONNECTIVITY, AN EVOLVING SET OF PRIORITIES

blog-us

2 September 2019

FOR TRANSATLANTIC CONNECTIVITY, AN EVOLVING SET OF PRIORITIES

By Steve McConnell, BSO

Historically, the key factors for companies seeking low latency, transatlantic connectivity have been speed, reliability and cost. Market participants trading between different financial hubs needed a guaranteed level of performance, and beyond that it often came down to cost.

But the connectivity marketplace is evolving and it’s
clear that many market participants are bringing different factors into their
decision-making process. Speed remains a hugely important factor for financial
trading networks, but today providers have to compete based on other
differentiators. In the case of transatlantic connectivity, the emerging key
factors are flexibility and service.

This first of these, flexibility, has gained
importance in light of outages that have left industry players scrambling. If
an outage occurs, firms need to know they have other options for connecting
between European centers and North America. Having route diversity provides a
degree of protection for an aspect of trading that is mission-critical.

But flexibility is not just about clients knowing they
have multiple data route options. They also need to think about being able to
adapt to big changes in international trading patterns.

For instance, it’s early days with regards to Brexit,
but the question marks surrounding the EU exit have become a complicating
factor since trading firms are well aware that liquidity in some markets could quickly
shift. Trading centres not only in various parts of Europe but also in Asia are
gearing up to compete for business once there is more clarity around the
London’s role as a trading centre that currently boasts the world’s largest
forex market and enormous amounts of trade in every asset class.

Another big development that increases the value of
flexibility is the trend towards greater data usage. Having large capacity
actually used to be about speed. Many large firms opted for 10 gigabyte
circuits because anything less added latency overhead to deliver it. But market
data feeds over the years have grown exponentially.

Any firm that gets a full book from a major exchange
such as ICE or Nasdaq will need plenty of capacity, with some feeds
consolidating a number of exchanges. In fact, 100GbE capacity is becoming
increasingly common. As a measure of how quickly the industry is evolving, the
capability for 100GbE transatlantic connectivity has only been around for half
a dozen years. The good news is that as that level of capacity becomes the new
normal, it compresses costs on 10GbE circuits.

That leads to the other major new differentiator,
which is service. Firms dealing with that much data traffic generally need a level
of interaction that is traditionally not associated with a commoditized service
provided by a large telco.

The first thing to note is that every firm has unique
requirements. For instance, as firms expand into emerging markets, they may
need the ability to move data around their core network and then extend it into
the new markets they are trading. Such firms will want to know they can partner
with their service providers to find optimum ways to do that.

Companies engaged in this business are also constantly
looking at upgrading and modifying their network. Having a provider that can offer
dedicated resource for projects can make an enormous difference, particularly
for those firms that are expanding and looking to build new trading capabilities.

Quality service is not just about resource. It’s also
about experience. Providers need to have staff who actually understand the
business of trading. They need to understand the different ways that
connectivity decisions can impact a trading firm because of latency
ramifications. Companies now are placing a lot of value in this level of service,
as opposed to the anonymous experience of renting a line from a provider that isn’t
focused on the underlying business.

These are a few of the ways that transatlantic connectivity is evolving. What’s notable here is what we haven’t mentioned, namely technology. Of course, changes in technology will always be a key factor for latency-sensitive trading firms. But right now, what has become abundantly clear is that the key value proposition for many participants involves the human angle. We may be talking about connectivity that bridges hundreds and hundreds of miles, but the real distance that market participants are interested in addressing is between their firms and their providers.