Wednesday, February 20, 2013

One Reason Why Your New Year's Fitness Resolution Isn't Working

Lots of people make the same New Year’s
Resolution year, after year, after year.
They say that they’d like to “get in shape” or “lose some extra pounds”
or “tone up a bit”. Do any of those
sound familiar to you? Sadly the
majority of resolution makers never achieve their goals.

I’m sure you recognize these
people. They’re the ones filling up cardio
rooms in gyms all across America the first 2 to 3 weeks of January. If you’re in a warmer climate, you’ll see
tons of joggers appear during the same time frame. These crowds of new gym members (or runners)
usually disappear by Groundhog Day, though sometimes there’s a resurgence right
before beach season too.

What’s wrong? Why aren’t they transforming their bodies
into stronger/leaner versions of what they had before?

Besides trying to go it alone, without qualified,
professional supervision, these people make one other glaring error (not that
there aren't other errors too!); they end up only addressing one piece of the
fitness equation. Just jogging, or doing cardio a few times a week isn’t
enough to get the job done. You may be asking why not? If I
exercise more I lose weight right? That’s only a half-truth.

There are three pieces to the fitness equation:

-Recovery

-Appropriate
Nutrition

-Weight
Training/Conditioning (at an adequate intensity)

I’m going to stick with the ‘cardio is
enough, right? I really don’t have to lift weights do I?’ theme here, but
please note that the other elements (recovery and nutrition) are just as
important in the whole scheme of things.
The problem with just going out and jogging (or putting in some
treadmill/elliptical time in the gym) is that it’s probably not intense enough
work to burn a significant amount of calories.
If you factor in a poor diet (either low nutritional value and/or high
calorie total) it’s pretty clear why just starting a cardio routine won’t get
you too far. I totally understand why
most folks give up. No one wants to put
in gym or road-work and not see any results.
They just don’t know that their effort is insufficient to create a
change in their body.

In addition, cardio (and I use that
word loosely) on it’s own, or as most people do it, is not the best means to
‘toning up’ or ‘losing some extra pounds’.
You’re probably thinking, “Jb, competitive marathon runners don’t look
like they have weight (fat) issues”. And
while that’s a fairly factual statement, I'd reply by asking if that really is the body-type you want
to end up with? Not that there’s
anything wrong with running in a marathon or being a competitive endurance
runner. It’s just that they are really,
really skinny. Competitive endurance
athletes also have a significantly greater volume of training going on than
your average cardio resolution maker.

Notice that on the fitness equation list
I put weight training along with
conditioning. When the words ‘weight
training’ are mentioned some people get turned off, or fear that they’re going
to ‘bulk up’ like a body builder. That
couldn’t be farther from the truth. If
it were true, everyone who’s picked up a barbell or a pair of dumbbells would
look like Arnold Schwarzenegger and Ronnie Coleman. And you don’t see to many specimens like that
walking around the gym.

The truth is most of the people I’ve
been talking about are some version of “skinny-fat”. What that means is they have a higher % of
body weight from fat and not a lot of muscle on their frame (think of a 140 lb.
female at 5’5” with 35% body fat, that’s skinny-fat). They are essentially super-skinny way down
underneath the layer of fat on their body.
So if they actually succeeded in loosing some weight or ‘toning up’,
there would be nothing more than skin and bone left (please don’t confuse this
example with folks who are extremely skinny from an eating disorder). You see this skinny-fat body type in both men
and women.

Increasing your muscle mass (and I do not mean becoming a body builder!) has a positive effect
aesthetically (after you’ve dropped the fat) and also increases your metabolism
(maybe not as much as it’s generally promoted, but still enough to help the fat
loss cause). Whether you like the idea
or not, the bottom line is you need to build up some level of muscle mass
(along with your conditioning work) to achieve the desired goals. If you still
need further proof that muscles are good, check out these Mountain Athlete examples:

Lindsey Vonn (5'10" 165#)

Julia Mancuso (5'6" 141#)

So the message is “don’t be afraid, lifting
weights is ok, muscles look good” and besides, if you’re going to put in all
that effort to ‘get lean’ or ‘tone-up’ why not have something underneath worth
showing off?