Why Brexit means diminished British weight in the world

A former head of the Foreign Office argues that the US won't save us

Foreign Secretary and prominent Brexiteer Boris Johnson. Photo: NurPhoto/SIPA USA/PA Images The system of international security, on which Britain’s foreign policy has been based since the post-war years, is under unprecedented stress. Russia and China are pursuing assertive nationalist policies, often with scant regard for the norms of the United Nations Charter. Russia has moved into the gap left by western inaction over the Syria crisis. China is building up its military power and bankrolling vast infrastructure projects in pursuit of its ambition to be the dominant power in Asia. In response, Defense Secretary James Mattis has said that great power competition is now the top national security priority for the United States. President Trump seems sceptical about NATO, as with America’s multilateral commitments generally. Britain once again faces Dean Acheson’s question about finding a role. Jacob Rees-Mogg and other Tory Brexiteers have a simple answer. They dream of a return to an imagined golden age when Britain was at the heart of the Anglosphere; in the short-term they advocate putting all our energies into becoming President Trump’s best friend. They should get out more. The world has moved on, and Britain’s role in it has diminished since the days of Roosevelt and Churchill. For a start we cannot check out of Europe, as if we could decide that our geographic location no longer suited us. After Brexit, Britain will continue to share vital interests with its European neighbours. They will continue to be our main trading partners, whatever the outcome of the current wrangles about our future customs relationship. They will be essential partners in the fight against terrorism and organised crime. Europe will still be the destination of choice for millions of British people for holidays, study and (post-Brexit conditions permitting) work. The smooth flow of this immense volume of people and goods across the channel is only possible because of the cooperation of our French partners in allowing British border controls on the French side, preventing thousands of illegal migrants getting across to British ports. “To make the most of our unrivalled international networks, Britain will need a Foreign Secretary respected around the world” Britain will still be a European power, looking out at the world from the same vantage point as the continental Europeans. On many of the key international issues, from free trade, to climate change and how to prevent Iran becoming a nuclear weapons power, British interests are served by the European approach (which we were instrumental in shaping) rather than that of the current US Administration. That is not to underplay the importance of our alliance with Washington. For example, we have a closer partnership with the Americans in the areas of defence and intelligence cooperation than any other country, and it is vital to Britain’s national security. But the time is now past, if it ever existed, when Britain was the interpreter of Europe to America. The US has other special relationships in Europe, as was very evident during President Macron’s celebratory state visit to Washington. The Americans have a good instinct for where power lies, and they see that France’s young President is now the leading European statesman, with a solid domestic position and the ambition and drive to pursue an activist foreign policy. The uncomfortable truth is that Brexit is diminishing Britain’s weight in the world, and therefore our value to Washington. That is demonstrably true at present, with the infighting over the details of Brexit taking up all the bandwidth in the government, leaving no time or energy for foreign policy beyond responding to events (which, to be fair, the prime minister did effectively in the aftermath of the poisoning of the Skripals). Once Britain is outside the European Union, we will no longer be at the table to leverage European support for our foreign policy priorities, as we have done many times in the past, most recently over sanctions on Russia following the annexation of Crimea. The EU itself has major choices to make, between continuing integration or accepting greater diversity, and between a focus on its region or taking on a wider foreign policy role. We will play no part in those choices, but will be affected by them. In short, Britain will have influence in proportion to our capacity to develop useful foreign policy initiatives, and to take the risks and put in the political energy to make them happen. It will mean making the most of our unrivalled international networks, for which we will need for starters a properly-funded Foreign Office, and a Foreign Secretary respected around the world. Outside the EU, we will have to work harder to have global impact. We do not have a freehold on our seat at the top table.

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days. But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Email

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

Comments

NR_BUCHSBAUM

May 12, 2018 at 16:13

Britain is a democratic country with long traditions of constitutional government, not something as entrenched in continental Europe as in North America and Australia. Germany, Italy and eastern Europe and the Iberian peninsula are two generations away from dictatorship and have no long history of democratic norms. Britain pursued "free trade," because it was in its national interest----the EU is protectionist, its governing bodies undemocratic and not answerable to the people and its principles in foreign policy governed by Mammon. There is no longer any significant attachment to Christianity in most of western Europe, and with no principles but getting rich, it is easy to see why Europe has become so less regarded and respected in the world. Britain's cost of food rose once it joined the EU and lessened its economic ties with Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Those and its ties with its biggest customer, the USA, could grow once Britain is freed from the bureaucracy of the EU and all its restrictions. Britain is full of independent, creative people while Europe likes conformity. English common law and the Napoleonic code and its descendants just show that Britain is different from Europe and never really went into the EU completely, hanging back from the euro and Schengen. Don't be so afraid of living how Britain did during its best days.

DAVID_CUTTS

May 13, 2018 at 12:02

Ah..'its best days'. When? The first decade of the 20th century? The 1960s? The 1970s - surely not? In many respects the first decade of the 21st was pretty good, but the roots of the inequalities that drive our misery today were deep in the 1980s but flourishing in the pre and post crisis era.
The US is a very interesting market if you have the right products and services. You don't need a trade deal to make good business there possible and you might need to avoid a trade deal to inhibit many elements of US over-reach.

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

How has the national broadcaster dealt with the biggest issue of our time? Plus: James Graham on John Bercow and Jennifer Williams on Manchester's housing boom (and homelessness crisis)

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days.. PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.