A federal judge in Eugene on Wednesday
heard arguments in favor of striking down Oregon's ban on gay
marriage.

The case is unique in that all parties
represented, including the state, unanimously oppose the ban.

“We simply can't imagine a
rationalization for the ban,” a lawyer for the state told U.S.
District Judge Michael McShane.

Supporters of marriage equality held
rallies in seven cities on the eve of the hearing.

“Every adult – every single adult –
ought to be able to marry that person they love. It is time,”
Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat, told a crowd at one of the rallies
held in downtown Portland. “If you don't share our view, if you
don't approve of gay marriage, don't get one.”

In a last-minute filing, the National
Organization for Marriage (NOM) asked to intervene in the case.

“The notion that there are no
plausible arguments to make in defense of marriage is ludicrous,”
said NOM Chairman John Eastman.

Jack Louman, executive director of
Oregon Family Council, called the state's refusal to defend the ban
“shameful.”

“We support any intervention to
defend Oregon's marriage laws that were duly enacted by the people of
Oregon. Everyone has had their voice heard in this case except the
majority of Oregonians who voted to define marriage as between one
man and one woman in 2004,” he said in a statement.

McShane will consider NOM's request
during a May 14 hearing. He briefly touched on the request during
Wednesday's hearing, saying that the case was unique because if he
strikes down the ban, there will be no appeal.