Follow by Email

Of Politics, Sports and Sex

OK, so there won't be a LOT on here about sex, but tell the truth, that's most of the reason you entered this site, right? So, I'll slip some things in from time to time just to keep you coming...back.

Total Pageviews

Thursday, May 21, 2015

These are all so good and so spot-on, I'm just going to combine these all into one post since there is so much good stuff here:

From George Will (!):
Proponents of capital punishment are losing the debate. "Nebraska is not a nest of liberals.
Yet on Wednesday its 49-member unicameral legislature passed a bill abolishing
the death penalty 32 to 15. ... First, the power to inflict death cloaks
government with a majesty and pretense of infallibility discordant with
conservatism. Second, when capital punishment is inflicted, it cannot later be
corrected because of new evidence, so a capital punishment regime must be
administered with extraordinary competence. It is, however, a government
program. Since 1973, more than 140 people sentenced to death have been
acquitted of their crimes (sometimes by DNA evidence), had the charges against
them dismissed by prosecutors or have been pardoned based on evidence of
innocence." The
Washington Post.

From The Atlantic:
Policymakers knew at the time that Iraq wasn't a threat and the invasion would
be risky. "No one
ever again—not a news person nor a civilian, not an American nor one from
anyplace else—should waste another second asking, 'Knowing what we know now,
would you have invaded Iraq?' ... Leaders don’t make decisions on the basis of
'what we know now' retrospectively. They have to weigh evidence based on 'what
we knew then,' in real time. ... The 'knowing what we know' question presumes
that the Bush Administration and the U.S. public were in the role of impartial
jurors, or good-faith strategic decision-makers, who while carefully weighing
the evidence were (unfortunately) pushed toward a decision to invade, because
the best-available information at the time indicated that there was an imminent
WMD threat. That view is entirely false."

In Bloomberg today:
A report concluded years ago that the Bush administration misrepresented
intelligence officers' conclusions. "That report, from June 2008, found that President George W. Bush,
Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Colin Powell, and others used
information from the intelligence community in public statements about Iraq but
routinely glossed over uncertainties, some of which were significant. ...
Administration officials’ statements about the link had no basis in analysts’
conclusions, while officials' repeated insinuations that Iraq would give
terrorists WMDs to attack the U.S. actually 'were contradicted by the available
intelligence.' The report also addressed the administration’s rosy predictions
about postwar Iraq. ... Before the war, the intelligence community actually
believed that '[e]stablishing a stable democratic government in postwar Iraq
would be a long, difficult and probably turbulent challenge.' "

"After
more than a decade bearing the political burden of Iraq, Republicans are making
a dogged effort to shed it by arguing that the Islamic State’s gruesome ascent
is a symptom of Obama’s foreign policy, rather than a byproduct of the 2003
invasion they once championed. ... The rapid move to shift responsibility is at
the core of the GOP’s plan to define 2016 as a foreign-policy election. Anxious
about demographic trends and the leftward drift of the electorate on social
issues, many Republicans hope to seize on global unrest and offer voters a
steady hand."

--
"At the least, it is an attempt to have Iraq seen as a shared failure,
begun by a Republican president and a Republican-controlled Congress but
inherited and fumbled by Democrats." (Washington
Post)

In Vox today:
Hillary Rodham Clinton has a plan to help small bankers. "Being for small business in American
politics is like having a favorable attitude toward Mom or apple pie. But
campaigning in Iowa this week, Hillary Clinton's thus-far policy-light campaign
rolled out the germ of a small-business idea that has big implications: the
federal government should help smaller businesses by showing more favorable
treatment to small banks. ... The specific claim that the health of the
community banking sector is critical for small businesses is a piece of
longstanding conventional wisdom within the small business community, a point
of pride for community bankers, and backed up by a fair amount of expert
analysis. It is not, however, a point of universal agreement. ... Of course, a
separate question is whether a financial model that disproportionately benefits
smaller companies is good for the country overall."

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Eighteen years ago, when I was between jobs, I read in the newspaper, probably
the Phila. Daily News, about an upcoming Volunteerism Summit to be held in a dicey
part of North Philly, where volunteers would be asked to clean up pre-designated
parts of the city for an afternoon.

I’d like to say that I just signed up to be
helpful since I had a lot of free time on my hands, and I’m pretty sure that
was an element of my decision to get involved, but included in the story was
the news that President Clinton would be there as well, so I decided that this
might be a good chance for me to spend some quality time with one of the greatest
Presidents in this Nation’s history.

As it turned out, President Clinton wasn’t
the only dignitary to attend. Arriving early, I was about 10-15 yards from the
outdoor stage, where President Bill
Clinton and wife, Hillary; President Jimmy Carter and wife, Rosalyn; President
George H.W. Bush and (I think) his wife Barbara Bush;
General Colin Powell; Nancy Reagan; and Vice President Al Gore and his wife, Tipper
stood on April 27, 1997 at Marcus Foster Stadium.

Once the
hour or so of speechifying was finished, we were all sent to our pre-set
assignments based on the color of the t-shirts we’d been handed upon our entry.
I rode my assigned bus until they told us to get off, just 50 or so yards down
the street from where I saw a large media crowd gathered around one particular
work group.

Despite the
protestations of an organizer who insisted, fruitlessly, that I stay with my
group, I jogged up to the other group to see who the fuss was about.

And there
being interviewed on CNN was my favorite all-time President, or if he wasn’t
already, he has been ever since that day, Jimmy Carter.

And pushy
wangler that I am, by mid-afternoon, I was literally elbow-to-elbow with the (ex-)
President, painting an old building. Not surprisingly, my mind raced with
things to ask him about, but I came up blank, except when he asked me my
opinion on whether we should paint over one particularly artistic 3’ by 3’ area
of colorful graffiti. After discussing the options, I demurred in my reply, but
unsurprisingly, President Carter chose to paint around it, not wanting to whitewash,
so to speak, a local child’s expression of artistry.

Later, we
were given box lunches, and I ate on a stoop of a building there with Roslyn
and Jimmy, who were constantly asked to pose for photos (pre-selfie days). True
to his reputation,
President Carter obliged each request though my two clear memories of that
interlude were:

1 – When those
making the requests were young males, he would pose and then go sit back down
to eat. When they were attractive young college-age girls, he gave them all the
time they desired, with Roslyn smiling and rolling her eyes as she watched.

2 – When the
organizers asked us to finish our lunches to get back to work, and there were still
people who wanted to chat and get pictures with the 73-year old President, he
reminded them that we were all there to work, and he picked up his gloves and
rake and got back to cleaning out an area strewn with trash.

A few years
later, I went back to the site to see whether the graffiti was still there, and
if the area was still as clean as we’d left it. The entire building the President
and I had painted was gone…demolished with no tangible evidence of its existence,
unlike the strong memories I have of that day that I hope will never leave me.

About Me

I live with my awesome family of 5 or 6 or maybe 8 depending on your definitions regarding an engaged step-daughter, an exchange student, and dogs, cats and stuff, in West Vincent in the house my dad built back in the 50's. I graduated from Westtown School and Earlham College, with a degree in Psychology, which helps explain why I'm an Accountant today. I've been a Quaker since I was 2 months old and a Phillies fan since I was 7. Being a Quaker has served me far better.
I hope you enjoy this blog. Let's try to keep it vitriol free.