Following a series of very public and very appalling scandals, the United Nations has come under increased scrutiny. In recent years it has promised to clean up its act, and has enacted new policies and procedures meant to restore its credibility. Unfortunately, it would seem those reforms have done little to purge the international organization of corruption and waste.<br><br>Last year, in an attempt to reform its corruption-rife procurement system, the UN blacklisted a number of vendors. Among them was an Italian company called Corimec, which gave bribes to UN officials in exchange for lucrative contracts. However less than one month after it was removed from the UN's list of approved vendors the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) purchased several million dollars worth of goods from Corimec. According to FOX News, the UNDP knew that Corimec had been blacklisted, but decided to use them anyway: "…UNDP officials declared that as a legally separate UN agency, they were not bound to honor the Procurement Service sanction…[this is] particularly significant, because the UNDP is the premier agency through which the UN operates on the ground in most of the 160 countries that it services." These events prompt us to wonder if the UN is really serious about cleaning up its act.<br><br>The procurement service scandal is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The pattern of corruption in the UN is widespread. A recent internal audit of the UN mission in Sudan, conducted by the UN Office for International Oversight Services, found that the organization has wasted tens of millions of dollars over the past three years. Auditors found "potential fraud indicators and cases of mismanagement and waste" as well as "dozens of irregularities" in how the money was spent - money that should have been used to help the people of Sudan. According to a recent article in the Washington Post, "UN officers in Sudan have squandered millions by renting warehouses that were never used, booking blocks of hotel rooms that were never filled, and losing thousands of food rations to theft and spoilage."<br><br>Hundreds of thousands of people in the Darfur region of Sudan have been slaughtered, and millions have been forced to flee their homes. The Islamic government that controls Sudan has been accused of genocide, but the United Nations has yet to take decisive action to stop the bloodshed. For the past five years they have done little but deliberate, procrastinate, and make empty threats.<br><br>The United Nations was created to maintain international peace and help solve the world's economic and humanitarian troubles, but the UN has failed time and time again to accomplish its primary objectives. The UN is plagued by scandal, widespread corruption, favoritism, and financial mismanagement. Furthermore, through its misconduct, negligence, and complacency the UN has aided terrorism and oppression worldwide.<br><br>It should come as no surprise, that amidst the scandals that have engulfed the UN, the organization has announced plans for a massive overhaul. The huge reforms will be unlike any changes made since the organization was founded in 1945. Historically, government never downsizes voluntarily; it always increases its power and minimizes accountability to its citizens. Government reinvention is frequently an effort to avoid the consequences of failed policies in the past, or to justify a government's continued expansion by posing solutions to the problems it has created.<br><br>Over the last decade, the United Nations has unabashedly pushed for what it calls "global governance." The UN is positioning itself for real global power and it has become evident that they will use the scandal and the ensuing "reforms" to advance closer to that goal.<br><br>Wonder why President Reagan wanted to chuck this behemoth, that does nothing, sucks up American dollars, and promotes mucho conflicts instead of preventing them? Hmmmmm......<br><br>A government that is large enough to supply everything you need is large enough to take everything you have - Thomas Jefferson

_________________________
"The value of the partisan is not in the amount of men and equipment he destroys, but in how many he keeps watching." COL John S. Mosby, CSA

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>UN is plagued by scandal, widespread corruption, favoritism, and financial mismanagement. Furthermore, through its misconduct, negligence, and complacency the UN has aided terrorism and oppression worldwide.<p><hr></blockquote><p> I agree. All those resolutions against Israel for example and no effort whatsoever on the part of some nations to see any of 'em implemented. Of course, like any organisation the UN is only as good as its members and, to be honest, they've been collectively pretty cr@p when it comes to the diversion and dissipation of resources. In that context one thinks immediately of Iraq where some nations were insisting on futile gesture politics and rattled on for months and months about weapons of mass destruction when nearly all of us realised that there weren't any. If only they had listened to the French and Russians the UN would have come out of that debacle with credit instead of, as it proved, discredit and humiliation for wasting all that time and money when it could have been doing something constructive in honour of the Charter.<br><br>km<br><br>

That description of the UN sounds like the description of any government.<br><br>Incidentally, do you have a source for the quotation allegedly by Jefferson that's in your signature? I don't recall ever seeing it in Jefferson's writings--but I'll admit I'm not a Jefferson scholar, so inquiring minds want to know.<br><br>[color:red]&#63743;</font color=red> [color:orange]&#63743;</font color=orange> [color:yellow]&#63743;</font color=yellow> [color:green]&#63743;</font color=green> [color:blue]&#63743;</font color=blue> [color:purple]&#63743;</font color=purple>

In his autobiography, he mentions this statement in a letter to William H. Cabell, dated June 29, 1807.<br><br>A government that is large enough to supply everything you need is large enough to take everything you have - Thomas Jefferson

_________________________
"The value of the partisan is not in the amount of men and equipment he destroys, but in how many he keeps watching." COL John S. Mosby, CSA

"A government that is large enough to supply everything you need is large enough to take away everything you have."<br><br><br>I don't care if the "letter to William H.Cabell" was dated "June 29, 1807 at 2:31 PM EST," that could NOT be an actual QUOTATION from Jefferson. Why? Well, obviously because of the casual usage of "everything YOU need," and "everything YOU have." That usage of "you" (instead of the third-person "one") is characteristic of the 20th Century, not 1807. Any educated person from that era would say "large enough to supply everything one needs;" there is NO WAY that Jefferson would have used "you" like that.<br><br>So if this is a quotation from an actual dated letter from 1807, I find strange, to say the least, that "Jefferson" writes as if it is 1957. <br><br>

I'm bored sitting in terminal B so I looked up all of Jefferson's letters. On that day he did indeed write to Cabell but you astutely foresaw that the quote is bogus. When I first started looking I started with "bogus quotes" + jefferson. The guy is buredened with the highest number of bogus quotes out there on the interenet.<br><br><br><br>

partIII<br><br>SIR, — Your favor by express was safely received &#8232;on Saturday night, and I am thankful to you for the &#8232;attention of which it is a proof. Considering the &#8232;General and State governments as co-operators in &#8232;the same holy concerns, the interest and happiness &#8232;of our country, the interchange of mutual aid is &#8232;among the most pleasing of the exercises of our duty. &#8232;Captain Gordon, the second in command of the &#8232;Chesapeake, has arrived here with the details of that &#8232;affair. Yet as the precaution you took of securing &#8232;us against the accident of wanting information, was &#8232;entirely proper, and the expense of the express justly &#8232;a national one, I have directed him to be paid here, &#8232;so that he is enabled to refund any money you may &#8232;have advanced him. <br><br><br>

Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.

All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.