Acknowledgement and thanks for Ken McCaslin's service to the TSC (his last conference call of his 2010-2011 term); we'll need to communicate our appreciation to him. Motion: Motion by Woody to acknowledge our appreciation for Ken, second by Ravi. Draft a letter in San Antonio for TSC members to sign and present to Ken. Vote: Unanimously approved.

Ed describes the material as accompaniment to the current standard, not intended for ballot. Ravi asks if how the comparisons are run; using a model comparer tool or visual comparison? Woody asserts it will probably be visual. Patrick notes the outcome will probably be change requests to Clinical Statement or Pharmacy to one or the other set of models. Helen supports and expresses interest that more groups would work towards developing consistency in models. Though the target dates are in the past, work is still being conducted. Helen would like to see the dates updated in Project Insight to reflect actual progress. ACTION ITEM: TSC will ask Dave to obtain those updated dates.

Vote: Unanimously approved.

Discussion topics:

Steering Division composition between DESD and SSDSD

Recently approved process for WGs to change Steering Divisions. CG prompted discussion with request to move to DESD from SSD SD. SSD SD interested in swap, perhaps for Imaging Integration. Both SDs should schedule time on their agendas in San Antonio to consider the requests (Ed and Pat). Woody notes that when the Steering Division composition was initially proposed, the clear division between DESD and SSD SD was less obvious than the separation from other Steering Divisions. There's not good guidance for separation other than the ballot frequency of SSD SD members compared to DESD. The difference between the two SDs are not that well described. Ed notes that the division was a bit artificial. Pat notes that Child Health is in DESD but as an offshoot of the EHR WG she didn't understand how it ended up there. SIGs tended to end up in Domain Experts, Woody offers. Austin suggests the SD chairs may want a caucus of the affected parties. Ed suggests a common motion to be presented for each of the two Steering Divisions to consider. Also consider cochairs from both WGs be present in each of the two Steering Divisions during the discussions. ACTION ITEM: Pat will send out a notice of the proposed process to the two groups. TSC will be meeting again Tuesday to address the outcome if necessary. Ed recalls a concern that Imaging Integration is often lacking representation at the WGM so their participation in the two SD meetings simultaneously may be an issue.

WGM registration 178; comparative figures from a year ago would be to the Sydney meeting; only about a hundred registrants recalled from this time last year. HQ comparison numbers not available at this time.

See you in 2012!

Next Steps

Actions(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)

TSC will ask Dave to obtain those updated dates for the Clinical Statement project objectives for Project Insight.

Pat will send out a notice of the proposed process to the two groups affected by the Steering Division WG swap.