Comments on: Great news: Healthcare.gov still has “critical risk” security flawshttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/11/19/great-news-healthcare-gov-still-has-critical-risk-security-flaws/
The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast networkTue, 16 Feb 2016 23:43:33 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6.1By: FERPA 101 | Education Freedom Ohiohttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/11/19/great-news-healthcare-gov-still-has-critical-risk-security-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7528748
Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:43:17 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=287780#comment-7528748[…] fact, if you can stand the irony, within days of one another last week, Reuters Hot Air reported that ObamaCare's lack of data security measures put user data at "critical risk" for theft, and Ben […]
]]>By: Great news: Healthcare.gov still has “critical risk” security flaws | Expound & CSocial Content Testhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/11/19/great-news-healthcare-gov-still-has-critical-risk-security-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7505067
Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:33:12 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=287780#comment-7505067[…] Read this post » […]
]]>By: jpcpt03http://hotair.com/archives/2013/11/19/great-news-healthcare-gov-still-has-critical-risk-security-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7503678
Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:47:13 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=287780#comment-7503678The Security problems are not yet at hand. There is just nothing there to steal. There is just nothing more secure then an empty Bank Vault. Just wait a year. When they get it working and the Medical records go on line. At that time the new game will not be ID theft but “Black Mail”. What would be the value of Obama’s real medical Records? What would be paid for the true record of Congressman’s drug and alcohol abuse treatments?

Cost of all this? Well put this with the other lies but so far it must be well over 5 Billion Dollars, including all the selling ad work and raw costs and man hours. If you “like it you can keep it” lie, if site not fixed in 10 days the litigation could reach 2-6 Trillion Dollars. Add to that ID theft and Black Mail .

…but at best, it will only work for 80% of the people who need to use it.

Does any of this lend any comfort to the information / date regarding subsidies being correct? Or being willing to trust your personal data – including payment information (when it’s built) – with HHS / CMS?

Pretty sure that what an “A” is in the affirmative action world of higher learning.

B=70%
C=50%
D=30%
F=0%

This grading scale is more fair and levels the playing field.

]]>By: SteveInRTPhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/11/19/great-news-healthcare-gov-still-has-critical-risk-security-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7501580
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:50:18 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=287780#comment-7501580I work for a large IT company, and over the last few years this kind of stuff doesn’t surprise me any more.

To give this a slightly positive spin, according to ACA supporters, the people using the website are people that couldn’t afford insurance before, so hopefully they don’t have enough money to incent crooks to try to hack their information.

talkingpoints on November 19, 2013 at 11:01 AM

That is information that can be sold on the cheap to illegals so they can get legitimate jobs.

Oh, and that poor person is stuck with the tax liability and trying to clear their name, which costs them money they don’t have.

ajacksonian on November 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM

The victim doesn’t have to have money; the criminals open credit card accounts in their name and create new debts for them.

To give this a slightly positive spin, according to ACA supporters, the people using the website are people that couldn’t afford insurance before, so hopefully they don’t have enough money to incent crooks to try to hack their information.

talkingpoints on November 19, 2013 at 11:01 AM

That is information that can be sold on the cheap to illegals so they can get legitimate jobs.

Oh, and that poor person is stuck with the tax liability and trying to clear their name, which costs them money they don’t have.

]]>By: ajacksonianhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/11/19/great-news-healthcare-gov-still-has-critical-risk-security-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7501410
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:06:40 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=287780#comment-7501410Are we sure this isn’t really part of the Identity Theft and Criminal Full Employment act?

You say “qualify for subsidies” as if that isn’t stealing money from some Americans to pay the freight for others.

Happy Nomad on November 19, 2013 at 11:54 AM

And what do you call doubling (or higher) premiums to pay for services the policy holder doesn’t want and will never use? I don’t blame people who have been forced into an untenable situation by Obama for taking the only action available to protect themselves and their families. I can only hope unbearable pain falls at the feet of the jackasses who voted Democrat.

And here I was left, yesterday, sympathizing with the 20% the website wouldn’t work for.

Now, today, I instead have to consider them lucky and sympathize with the 80% the website will work for?

Dusty on November 19, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Never fear! The 20% can always go to some ex-felon starting his new career as an Obamacare navigator.

]]>By: Sterling Holobytehttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/11/19/great-news-healthcare-gov-still-has-critical-risk-security-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7501371
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:55:28 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=287780#comment-7501371Just wondering how many of those “security flaws” are due to tracking keylogger programs and such put there by the administration.
]]>By: Happy Nomadhttp://hotair.com/archives/2013/11/19/great-news-healthcare-gov-still-has-critical-risk-security-flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-7501368
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:54:05 +0000http://hotair.com/?p=287780#comment-7501368

Self employed individuals who liked their insurance and could afford their insurance who found their policies cancelled and the new Obama-compliant policies have priced them out of the market unless they can qualify for subsidies.

Wendya on November 19, 2013 at 11:37 AM

You say “qualify for subsidies” as if that isn’t stealing money from some Americans to pay the freight for others. I have problems with the whole wealth redistribution aspect of Obamacare but that’s hidden behind the idea that the money used for “subsidies” is clean money and not taking money away from some other family.