NATO weighs future of Afghanistan mission

Upcoming elections in Afghanistan will complicate the picture for NATO, as those polls decide what parties should be involved in peace moves.

Lorne Cook

Associated PressFebruary 14, 20198:56pm

NATO defence ministers have weighed the future of the alliance's operation in Afghanistan and debated how best to use its military presence to support political talks aimed at ending the conflict.

Frustrated with America's longest war, US President Donald Trump says he wants to pull out troops, raising doubts about NATO's Afghan troop training operation in the strife-torn country.

Around 14,000 US troops are in Afghanistan, just over half with NATO and the rest doing counter-terror and combat operations.

Were US troops to leave the NATO operation, allies like Germany wouldn't be able to do their job as they rely on American air support.

"No decision has been taken about any withdrawal. But we strongly support the efforts to reach a political, peaceful settlement," NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said before the talks on Thursday.

The US and NATO troops are mostly advising and training, but when requested they assist Afghan forces in battles with the Taliban, who carry out near-daily assaults on Afghan soldiers and police.

More than 17 years after they were ousted by a US-led coalition, the Taliban control, influence or hold sway over nearly half the country, and the conflict is at a stalemate.

US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad is meeting with the Taliban and others to try to end the conflict. He has briefed NATO ambassadors three times in recent weeks, including just before Thursday's meeting.

NATO is wary of setting any timeline for a possible withdrawal as the Taliban have been content to wait international forces out in the past.

"NATO allies went in together in Afghanistan. We will make decisions on our future posture in Afghanistan together, based on conditions determined together with the Afghans," Stoltenberg said.

Still, the Western allies understand that an offer to leave could be a powerful bargaining chip with the insurgents, even if the US-led forces would want guarantees, or be able to monitor future peace moves. What is clear is that the 29-country military alliance has no shared appetite to shift from training and mentoring to counter-terrorism operations.

For the moment though it is too early to tell. Upcoming elections in Afghanistan will further complicate the picture for NATO, as those polls decide what parties should be involved in peace moves.