Share this

A number of journalists at the UK edition of the International Business Times are concerned about what is seen as an over-reliance on content taken from other websites – a practice known as “ripping” or “lifting”.

Multiple sources have told Press Gazette of their concerns that some of the title’s reporters spend most of their time rewriting stories published elsewhere rather than on original reporting.

Press Gazette has looked at the sourcing of 50 stories which appeared in the UK news section of the IB Times on 8 August and defined 18 of these as appearing to have been “ripped” from other websites.

IB Times said in a statement: “Every day, the International Business Times UK produces a diverse range of content for its readers. This includes original reporting, comment, photo galleries, live sports coverage, innovative video, interviews and in depth features.

“Indeed, the excellence of our best content has been recognised by a clutch of press awards.

“In 2017, this has included the Online Media Awards ‘Best Digital Writer of the year’ award and the prestigious US-based Telly Award for a moving video documentary on the plight of Romanian orphans.

“We are committed to producing outstanding journalism and are proud of our range of in-depth, original and immersive pieces – from the French presidential election and the threat to democracy in Hungary to the battle for transgender rights.

“Where we do publish content from other news outlets, it is rigorously attributed and enriched with our own journalism.”

Recent stories on the site which appeared to be taken from one source, which is another publisher, include the following:

But, insiders said that earlier this year “traffic went off a cliff” after an apparent change in the way the website ranks on Google.

This is born out by evidence from web metrics service Alexa which ranked ibtimes.co.uk at around the 1,000th most popular website in the world in February. Alexa says says that position has slipped to 1,894 today.

One well-placed source told Press Gazette: “Around the start of the year IB Times’s UK’s traffic went off a cliff as we stopped ranking on Google with any regularity.

“People continued to work pretty much as normal but traffic never returned. In May, as you reported, people were made redundant, and since then things have progressively gotten worse.

“One week writers are told to root out stories that are unique and shareable (of course, we did this already), the next a quota of five stories a day is imposed.

“In a recent effort to drive traffic there’s also been a ban on people taking work trips abroad or even attending local events during office hours. They want us in the office, eight ’til five, every day, writing as many stories as we can.

“A lot of very talented journalists work at IBT, and have worked here over the years. Not one of them is to blame for the current situation… People used to love it here.”

Another source said that up to around five months ago journalists were encouraged to spend some time every day finding exclusives, attending events and building contacts.

They said: “We wrote some great stuff, and the thinking was that because we weren’t shackled by being a newspaper of record with huge overheads, we had the freedom to cover by and large anything we wanted.”

They said that since the drop in traffic work practices have changed including reporters being given daily story quotas.

A source said that for some reporters at the title the working day at IB Times currently goes as follows:

“1. Arrive into a silent office (hardly anyone is on the phone… ever)

“2. Log in to the shared ‘stories list’ excel spreadsheet. This is a list of stories on other media outlets

“3. Take the top story, rewrite it, hit submit. Go on to the next story