Comment: Rural development plans could be a howler

Reintroduction of wolves may have financial benefits. Picture: Getty

ANDREW ARBUCKLE

Reading some of the responses to the proposal by the John Muir Trust to bring back wolves to Scotland, it was clear that many people had been influenced by reading Jack London’s tales of derring do in the Frozen North.

For those not familiar with his writing, there were wonderfully scary stories of packs of wolves circling the lone backwoodsman as he sat at his camp fire. As the fire gradually burned down to embers, the wolves moved closer and closer …

For some with vivid imaginations, the re-introduction of this species in what is called “rewilding” the Scottish countryside, there will be large numbers of solitary hillwalkers consumed by wolves.

For farmers, bringing back wolves to this country could be considered a negative as these animals, in common with all other predators, will target as easy prey as they can, and sheep are considerably easier cornered and killed than a wiry and fleet-of-foot walker.

Turning this issue into a positive for farmers, if wolves are to be reintroduced, farmers should be compensated for any loss of livestock. This suggestion comes as the details for the next Scottish Rural Development Programme are about to be announced, and inclusion of such a compensatory package would be essential.

“Rural development?”, I hear you say. “What is there about killing sheep and lambs that qualifies as rural development?”

The answer apparently lies in the number of people who will come and visit our country in order to see “red in tooth and claw” wildlife.

Farmers may also recall European agricultural commissioner Dacian Ciolos’s claim one of the main reasons the Common Agricultural Policy held on to the majority of its budget was because it could deliver wider public benefits than just providing food.

Well here, through the payment of additional cash to sheep farmers in areas where wolves will be encouraged to roam, is an opportunity increase the diversity of animal life in our countryside.

To counter any criticism that the proposal is cruel, it is necessary to remind people that sheep are used to mop up, or host, blood-sucking ticks on grouse moors. The financial reward from keeping grouse free from ticks being greater than the pain suffered by sheep riddled with blood swollen ticks.

Back to the killing proposal, it might be claimed that proof of loss might be difficult but an extra payment for every ewe in the affected area would get round that problem.

The same solution could solve the problem sheep farmers are having in areas where sea eagles have been introduced. These farmers are now losing large numbers of lambs to these aerial predators, so why not have additional payments from the public purse for those farming within a certain radius of nesting sea eagles.

If there is more than one nest or if there are young single eagles, the cash support would be increased.

Some questions might be asked in official quarters if the support cash was paid out on a headage basis; that being a big no-no as far as the bureaucrats are concerned.

However, the extra cash would not be linked to production. Quite the reverse in fact with all the livestock being killed; it would be a negative production policy. This is a policy which might confound the policy makers.

In a similar vein, great swathes of the country are now beset by increased numbers of geese. Apart from the overall goose population rising, there is the problem of increasing numbers of lazy geese which are not migrating. Having given up their long flights, they seem perfectly happy just to hang around their winter feeding grounds for 12 months each year.

Again an extension of the compensation scheme currently operated in Islay to other goose feeding areas would be a big plus for farmers.

If the compensation policy needed any endorsement, it could come from Ireland, where the Irish have a scheme to protect hen harriers.

The Irish Farmers Association is claiming that farmers in the designated areas have had their farms devalued by up to £1,000 per acre and compensation is needed.

By concentrating on producing food, are farmers losing out on other schemes which might go against their basic principles but which could produce financial rewards?

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice.
If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the
Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the IPSO by
clicking here.

The Scotsman provides news, events and sport features from the Edinburgh area. For the best up to date information relating to Edinburgh and the surrounding areas visit us at The Scotsman regularly or bookmark this page.

For you to enjoy all the features of this website The Scotsman requires permission to use cookies.

Find Out More ▼

What is a Cookie?

What is a Flash Cookie?

Can I opt out of receiving Cookies?

About our Cookies

Cookies are small data files which are sent to your browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome etc) from a website you visit. They are stored on your electronic device.

This is a type of cookie which is collected by Adobe Flash media player (it is also called a Local Shared Object) - a piece of software you may already have on your electronic device to help you watch online videos and listen to podcasts.

Yes there are a number of options available, you can set your browser either to reject all cookies, to allow only "trusted" sites to set them, or to only accept them from the site you are currently on.

However, please note - if you block/delete all cookies, some features of our websites, such as remembering your login details, or the site branding for your local newspaper may not function as a result.

The types of cookies we, our ad network and technology partners use are listed below:

Revenue Science ►

A tool used by some of our advertisers to target adverts to you based on pages you have visited in the past. To opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

Google Ads ►

Our sites contain advertising from Google; these use cookies to ensure you get adverts relevant to you. You can tailor the type of ads you receive by visiting here or to opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

Digital Analytics ►

This is used to help us identify unique visitors to our websites. This data is anonymous and we cannot use this to uniquely identify individuals and their usage of the sites.

Dart for Publishers ►

This comes from our ad serving technology and is used to track how many times you have seen a particular ad on our sites, so that you don't just see one advert but an even spread. This information is not used by us for any other type of audience recording or monitoring.

ComScore ►

ComScore monitor and externally verify our site traffic data for use within the advertising industry. Any data collected is anonymous statistical data and cannot be traced back to an individual.

Local Targeting ►

Our Classified websites (Photos, Motors, Jobs and Property Today) use cookies to ensure you get the correct local newspaper branding and content when you visit them. These cookies store no personally identifiable information.

Grapeshot ►

We use Grapeshot as a contextual targeting technology, allowing us to create custom groups of stories outside out of our usual site navigation. Grapeshot stores the categories of story you have been exposed to. Their privacy policy and opt out option can be accessed here.

Subscriptions Online ►

Our partner for Newspaper subscriptions online stores data from the forms you complete in these to increase the usability of the site and enhance user experience.

Add This ►

Add This provides the social networking widget found in many of our pages. This widget gives you the tools to bookmark our websites, blog, share, tweet and email our content to a friend.