What Makes Someone an Elitist?

The rule of thumb for American politics in the media appears to be classifying politicians as being on the “beer-track” or “wine-track”, or, in the alternative Hillary Clinton formation, “Starbucks vs. Dunkin’ Donuts”. In other words, if you prefer wine over beer or Starbucks over Dunkin’ Donuts, then you are an “elitist”, and if not, you’re just a “regular person.”

The problem with this formulation is that with the myriad of consumer choices to be made these days, this seems to be a simplisitic formula by which to judge elitism, doesn’t it? For one thing, if you get coffee at Starbucks, are you more of an elitist than someone who gets a latte at Dunkin’ Donuts?

Here are some other issues:

I prefer beer to wine, generally, but I prefer wine to what passes for “beer” to most Americans–the flavorless pilsners that go by Budweiser, Coors, etc. Is that elitist or not?

I prefer gin martinis to vodka martinis. Is that non-elitist, or does choosing between martinis automatically make one elitist to begin with?

I like smoking cigars, but not only do my firefighter and military buddies enjoy them, but my country club golfer friends do, too. So is cigar smoking elitist, or a regular joe thing?

I prefer prime rib to filet mignon–which I’m pretty sure makes me not an elitist. Still, how close a call is that? Is the non-elitist choice there “burger”?

I prefer local family pizza joints to Pizza Hut. On the one hand, preferring local to chains seems to put you in the elitist camp. On the other hand, family joints tend to be more working class places. So does that mean non-elitist? It’s a tough call.

I can barely break 100 when I bowl, which I’m pretty sure makes me elitist, given the outcry over Obama’s abysmal 37. On the other hand, my Wii bowling average is about 180. So does that make me non-elitist?

Really, somebody needs to put out some sort of guide for this so that reporters can keep it on hand. And let me know if I’m an elitist, too, wouldja?

It is unfortunate, sad , and Tragic that some media will crater to sensationalism and end up duping, depriving , and deceiving the common people the real issues and challenges facing our Nation. We at a critical time in our current political process to move ahead decades but The Common Americans are not provided the opportunity by some media. A word bitter can divide this nation for ever and create lot of news for cooperate Media[Dollers] No body cares about America and everybody cares about dollars which could become less valued and valueless

COL [retd] A.M. Khajawall MD, most non-elitist Americans believe we would all be a lot better off if Washington stayed out of our pockets.

Every plan Obama is coming up with calls for more money …. and big government “misplaces”our money like the hundreds of millions in Dept of Education dollars that even outside auditors can’t track down, overspends our money on things like $700 toilet bowls for Air Force planes, and steals our money like the credit card charges which have yet again hit, for the umpteenth time, the news in the past few days.

p.s. For the record when indicating you are retired military it is customary to also indicate in which US service branch you served.

You should distinguish between being elite and being an elitist . . . not what you choose but the attitude with which you choose them.

I think that’s ultimately right. If you prefer to drink microbrews because you think they taste better than Budweiser and can afford to pay the higher cost, as we both do, that perhaps makes you an elite. If you think it therefore makes you better than the poor losers who drink Bud, you’re an elitist.

In my sphere the difference between an elitist and a regular Joe is between fly-fishermen and worm fishermen. While fly-fishermen are often considered elitist, I prefer the determinate to be – whether or not they believe what they do is better -not just the act of doing it. In other words -even the worm fisherman could be called accurately and elitist

Do your children go to public schools? (I, a union carpenter, fail this test… than again, my son got kicked out of school for “distributing a controlled substance” while carrying a knife on school grounds… maybe that makes up for it?)

Do you own a gun? (you don’t have to actually use it)(I do)

Do you clean your own fish? (I do)(no fishing guides on the cricks around here)

Or here is another way:

Shakespeare or Elmore Leonard? (Nah… if you read anything, your an elitist.)(OK, I’ll admit it… I like them both)

Beethoven or Willie Nelson? (let me take that 2nd choice back…. Clint Black is better)(Again I will admit I like both Beethoven and Willie… Clint Black is another story.)

Yard bird from the grill with honey mustard barbecue sauce (your grandmother’s of course) or Cordon Blue? (forget it… if you know what cordon blue is… your an elitist)(again… both)

Sour mash from a mason jar or Jack Daniels Single Barrel?(hmmm… having a hard time coming up with a snide remark on this one… I prefer Single Malt)

Organic only or “whatever is on sale”? (Even I ain’t that picky)

Portabella’s or Green Giant mushrooms? (Went into my local small town grocery yesterday… the GG mushroom package in front was half full of a brown colored liquid… the Portabella’s? They looked good) (yes, I am that picky)

I think that’s ultimately right. If you prefer to drink microbrews because you think they taste better than Budweiser and can afford to pay the higher cost, as we both do, that perhaps makes you an elite. If you think it therefore makes you better than the poor losers who drink Bud, you’re an elitist.

So calling someone a “loser” based on their consumer preferences makes you an elitist? It’s hard to see how this argument avoids generalizing out to “there are no better or worse preferences, just different ones”, and “there are no better or worse people, just different ones”.
After all, there is no way to differentiate human beings, except based on their preferences, of which consumer preferences are an arbitrary subset.

But, to illustrate the point from another way – a guy with a sticker on the back of his Ford, showing Calvin urinating on a Chevy symbol – that guy’s an elitist? How about people who think cigarette smokers – or heroin users – are worse people? Are they elitist?

You’re making a much broader argument that you recognize by trying to salvage the concept of elitism. Alex is right to say that it’s an arbitrary and subjective amalgam of associating certain consumer products with wealth and good breeding.

If you would refuse to use poor folk’s favorite brands, then you’re an elitist. Either that, or (my preffered explanation) the whole concept is incoherent, but fundamental and applied by anyone, to anyone.

A regular Joe is one who does not naturally assume that they know the solution without knowing the situation.

An elitist is one that believes they “know” what is best by virtue of their status, education, or political view and assume that anyone who disagrees with that analysis is just too stoopid to know any better.

I was going by the old idea that to be something you have to assume that you are that something, and if you practice it long enough, you will be that something. Hence, you may be an elitist if you want to be one. Thing is, everyone has a different list of those things you must practice!
Perhaps you end up merely a snob!