"There is only one power that determines the course of history . . . the power of ideas." — Ayn Rand

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

People Don’t want ‘Paid Family Leave’ in NJ, So Let’s Expand It [?]

About 10 years ago, New Jersey enacted a Paid Family Leave Act. Funded by a payroll tax on employees, the program pays people who take off from work to care for a family member, usually a newborn child, 2/3 of her foregone salary up to a maximum of $633 per week.

But there’s a problem. It’s allegedly not working very well. A study was done by the “Left-leaning Trenton think tank New Jersey Policy Perspective,” according to NJ.com’s Samantha Marcus, and the new report found that “Just 12 percent of New Jersey's eligible new parents are receiving family leave benefits.” The NJPP analysis shows that “the limits of the [paid family leave] program, from the cap on weekly wages to the time limits, keep maternity and paternity leave out of reach for many low- and middle-income families.”

Since welfare statists measure success or failure of a government program based on how many, not how few, people become government dependent, you can imagine their “solution” to “problem.”

[Mothers] often don't [sign up] because the compensation is so paltry. Just two-thirds of your wage is replaced for up to six weeks, capped at $633 weekly. That's equivalent to an annual salary of $32,000, the poverty level for a two-person family.

It's hard for even middle class parents to afford this.

The thought that private savings can supplement the Family Leave check, but that people may not want to drain their private savings, doesn’t enter the worldview of welfare statists.

The Star-Ledger calls for raising the payment cap, citing California ($1173) and Rhode Island ($817), the only other states with paid family leave, even though, as Marcus reports, “participation rates aren't strikingly better: 17 percent in California and 12 percent in Rhode Island.” So why bother? The Star-Ledger ignores this fact:

Everyone, regardless of economic status, race or gender, should have the ability to take time off to care for a new child or loved one - it's unfair that some can't access paid leave, when we're all paying for it.

I left these comments, slightly edited, citing that last quote:

This is classic chain gang socialist rationalization. Tax-force everyone into some scheme to satisfy someone’s idea of what “should” be, and then scream “unfair” to justify ever-increasing expansion. But the only unfairness is forcibly seizing earnings from people against their will to satisfy some “need” they themselves do not personally see the need for. (Never mind polls. If “voters support paid family leave, and show a strong willingness to pay for it,” there would be no need to immorally vote away others people’s money to pay for it. Private voluntary funding would be plentiful. These voters are all hypocrites who don’t respect others’ right to act on their own judgement.)

We’re told that ObamaCare was “successful” because a lot of people signed up for the subsidized “insurance.” By that logic, New Jersey’s Paid Family Leave scheme, which is funded by a payroll tax on employees, is an utter failure. Not enough parasites were created. Only 12% signed up. By the Left’s own standard, it’s a failure.

Will the program be recognized as a failure, and repealed? No. The fact that 88% of the people were looted and pushed one more small step toward poverty, to pay for benefits they don’t need, want, or can afford to access, will be ignored by the socialist altruists. The logic that people who can’t afford the benefits can’t afford the taxes to begin with won’t register with these do-gooders.

The dirty little not-so-secret fact of the welfare state is that the taxes needed to pay for it pushes people toward and into poverty, on an ever-increasing scale, creating more “need” for more and/or bigger socialist schemes. It is a fundamentally immoral cycle.

Here’s a practical and moral solution: Allow people who need or believe they will eventually need some time off for family, but unable to afford it on their take-home pay, to opt out of their payroll taxes for such things as Social Security, Medicare, unemployment “insurance,” and other hidden “social welfare” schemes. This way, they can put the added take home pay aside to plan for their own family leave needs. Right now, the government rips 15.3% (combined employee and employer share) right off the top of people’s paychecks, just on Social Security and Medicare alone, to pay for other people’s needs. That’s morally corrupt but is the basic premise of socialism—force everyone into dependence on other people’s wallets.

All socialist programs begin with theft, and grow like cancers. And so it will probably be with Paid Family Leave in NJ. Another malignant socialist tumor will grow. I have another suggestion for our legislators: Start reversing the corrupt trend by repealing the existing Paid Family Leave Act and calling for the right of New Jerseyans to access their own money for their own purposes.

About Me

Greetings and welcome to my blog. My name is Michael A. (Mike) LaFerrara. I sometimes use the pen or "screen" name "Mike Zemack" or "Zemack" in online activism, such as posted comments on articles. “Zemack” stands for the first letters of the names of my six grandchildren (I now have seven, so I've also used "Zemack+1"). I was born in 1949 in New Jersey, U.S.A., where I retired from a career in the plumbing, building controls, and construction industries, and still reside with my wife of 44 years. The purpose of my blog is the discussion of a wide range of topics relating to human events from the perspective of Objectivism, the philosophy of reason, rational self-interest, and capitalism originated by Ayn Rand.

As Rand observed: “The professional intellectual is the field agent of the army whose commander-in-chief is the philosopher.” I am certainly not the philosopher. But neither am I a field agent, or general. I am a foot soldier in that Objectivist army that fights for an individualist society in which every person can live in dignified sovereignty, by his own reasoned judgment, for his own sake, in that state of peaceful coexistence with his fellow man that only capitalist political and economic freedom can provide. While I am a fully committed Objectivist, my opinions are based on my own understanding of Objectivism, and should not be taken as definitive “Objectivist positions.” For the full story of my journey toward Objectivism, see my Introduction.

One final introductory note: I strongly recommend Philosophy, Who Needs it, which highlights the inescapable importance of philosophy in every individual's life. I can be reached at mal.atlas@comcast.net. Thanks, Mike LaFerrara.

Recommended Essays/Videos

Quotes I Like

Let me give you a tip on a clue to men’s characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it. Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper’s bell of an approaching looter.—Francisco d'Anconia

I love getting older...I get to grow up and learn things. Madalyn, 5 years old, Montesorri student, and my grand-daughter

The best thing one can do for the poor is to not become one of them. Author Unknown

Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed. Francis Bacon

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. Ronald Reagan

Thinking is hard work. If it weren't, more people would do it. Henry Ford

Intellectual freedom cannot exist without political freedom; political freedom cannot exist without economic freedom; a free mind and a free market are corollaries. Ayn Rand