Pope Francis and the drama of sodomy in the Church and in the Diocese of Rome The explosive report by La7 network

The affirmation by Pope Francis that there is a gay lobby in the Vatican, should not be reduced to an extemporaneous quip, but evaluated and weighed in all of its tragic consequences. There are truly some saintly people in the Curia, but there is also a current of corruption. There is talk of a gay lobby , and it is true, it exists. We have to see what we can do about it.

The Holy Father pronounced these words during a private audience with the leaders of the Confederation of Latin American Religious (CLAR) which took place in Rome on the 6th of June 2013. It was a private meeting, and the interlocutor was an authoritative body, which [afterwards] drew up a written report of the Pontiffs conversation. This text was not destined for publication, but it is authentic, demonstrated by the fact that it went all round the world without any refutation from the Holy See.

The Pope did not refer to the Church in general, but to the Vatican, which is graver, because this is where he lives, surrounded by his closest collaborators. And it is exactly inside the Leonine City he affirms that a lobby exists, that is, a powerful and organized group, able to do all that a lobby normally does: exercise, in a licit or illicit manner, heavy pressure by directing some decisions in their own favour. The interests of a  gay lobby would be, in this case, that of promoting men who share the practice or ideology of homosexuality inside the Vatican institutions, and of avoiding the condemnation of this vice as it is [condemned] by the public conscience of the Church.

Ernesto Galli della Loggia, in an article published in the Corriere della Sera of the 23rd of June, wrote I ask myself what would have happened if this expression  'gay lobby'  had been adopted by Pope Ratzinger instead of Pope Francis, or more modestly, by a representative of the most acclaimed male chauvinism such as Silvio Berlusconi ( ). You do not need much to imagine [the reactions]: accusations from all parts about language blatantly homophobic, heated protests about the denigrating and persecutory intentions implied in such an expression, complaints from all the homosexual associations, ( ) and so forth. As in fact happened punctually in the past every time someone used similar words, and this someone for whatever reason was hated by that political part which identifies itself (no ifs and buts about it) with the cause of homosexual civil rights. But this time the expression 'gay lobby' was used by a person like Pope Francis, who has earned the universal reputation of being 'simple and good', to strike a group of powerful prelates, who have earned  let us be clear, for reasons more than justly deserved  the same universal reputation as the 'baddies'. I add simplifying quite brutally: because this time the words in question were intended to strike at a part that is generally considered corrupt and reactionary by definition, (in the first place, from the homosexual movement itself and its exponents). And thus [the term] 'gay lobby' can be used.

It could also be asked why the same mass-media which speaks of moral complicity when a bishop intervenes in a very weak way towards a pedophile priest (see example : Francesco Merlo, That Slap to Cardinal OBrien, in La Repubblica, 17th May 2013) [but] they are ready to attack him with homophobe, if he should intervene in a firm manner with a homosexual priest. Why is pedophilia a crime and homosexuality a right? The answer is simple. For the pseudo-relativist culture, that which renders pedophilia a crime is not its moral disorder, but the fact that the acts against nature are done harming minors. The reference is not to the moral law, but to the unlimited self-determination of the individual.

Pedophilia violates the rights of minors, while homosexuality affirms those of adults. Pedophile priests and homosexual priests in reality, appear to form the same lobby that is why they drink from the same libertarian, pansexual ideology, which has also penetrated inside the Church over the last fifty years.

The homo-heresy, namely, the theology of homosexuality, denounced by Father Dario Oko (With the Pope against Homoheresy), goes hand in hand with the theology of married priests. In both cases the enemy is the ecclesiastic celibate, a moral pillar which the Church has held on to since Her origins. Anyway, if the Pope expressed himself in these terms, he did so for obvious reasons. Some, such as the vaticanist Ignazio Ingrao, sustain that an entire chapter dedicated to the gay network is present in the relatio reported by the three cardinals charged by Benedict XVI to investigate the Curia: Julian Herranz, Salvatore De Giorgi and Jozef Tomko (Panorama, 24th June 2013). There are those who hypothesize that it was exactly the discovery of the presence of this network that would have pushed the abdication of Pope Benedict, by then intent in renouncing the Papacy. (Il Fatto 11th June 2013). There are also those who think that the words of the Pope would not be extraneous to the news that reached him about the events of Almo Collegio Capranica, denounced on the site Corrispondenza Romana in the article The Drama of Sodomy in the diocese of Rome which was promptly obscured by the Roman Tribunal. Behind that law-suit was the Rector of the Almo Collegio.

During the news on La7 on the 25th June (http://tg.la7.it/cronaca/video-i722957) we learned of an inquiry in course by the Roman Magistrates concerning a head-spinning ring of sexual encounters hosted by religious with minors. The denunciation which triggered off the investigation would contain around twenty names, among which is a papal master of ceremonies, a secretary to the Cardinal Vicar, four parish priests in charge of as many parishes to the north and west of Rome and other personalities of a high ecclesiastical level.

The behavior of certain ecclesiastical authorities confronted with scandals of this sort is astounding. When they learn of the existence of an immoral situation in a parish, in a college, in a seminary, they do not proceed to verify the truth, remove the guilty party and eliminate the filth, but manifest annoyance, if not reprobation towards those that have denounced the evil, and, in the best of cases, they limit themselves by taking into consideration that which may interest civil justice, for fear of being involved in judicial matters. They are silent about that which has purely a moral and canonical significance. The slogan could be  zero tolerance for the pedophiles, maximum tolerance  for homosexuals. The latter continue unperturbedly to occupy their places as parish priests, bishops, rectors of Colleges, forming that homo-mafia which Pope Francis defines as the gay lobby.

The Popes affirmation goes beyond the grave denunciation of the  filth in the Church made by Cardinal Ratzinger on Good Friday 2005, on the eve of his election to the Papacy. Also in that case the future Benedict XVI was certainly referring to the moral plague which, under the form of pedophilia, ephebophilia or more simply homosexuality was spreading throughout the Church. But the significance of Francis declaration is wider and reaches the one of Paul VI who in his homily of 29th June 1972, stated that from some crack, the smoke of Satan had entered the Temple of God. What is happening is exactly the consequence of that smoke of Satan which today is covering and suffocating the Church. Will Pope Francis intervene? This is the heartfelt plea of all those who are praying and battling for an authentic doctrinal and moral reform of the Mystical Body of Christ.

The behavior of certain ecclesiastical authorities confronted with scandals of this sort is astounding.

When they learn of the existence of an immoral situation in a parish, in a college, in a seminary, they do not proceed to verify the truth, remove the guilty party and eliminate the filth, but manifest annoyance,

if not reprobation towards those that have denounced the evil, and, in the best of cases, they limit themselves by taking into consideration that which may interest civil justice, for fear of being involved in judicial matters. They are silent about that which has purely a moral and canonical significance. The slogan could be  zero tolerance for the pedophiles, maximum tolerance  for homosexuals. The latter continue unperturbedly to occupy their places as parish priests, bishops, rectors of Colleges, forming that homo-mafia, which Pope Francis defines as the gay lobby.

The so called “pedophile priest” is almost nonexistent. It is repeated as anti-Catholic propaganda. Most of the these cases were homosexual priests and young men in their late teens. The Catholic seminaries and colleges include many homosexual priests. Michael Rose in “Goodbye Good Men” and others have documented this. Priests have contracted AIDS at a rate several times greater that of other men. There has been a homosexual conspiracy within the Catholic Church. Several Bishops including Archbishop Weakland (who secretly paid off his boyfriend with $500,000 in church funds) are said to be part of this homosexual conspiracy.

Pope Benedict worked to solve this problem, first as a Cardinal and then as Pope. Pope Francis must expel these people from the church.

Yep-—the Catholic Church has got to proclaim the Truth-—pick up the sword and fight Satan/Evil again. There is no compromise with Truth and Evil.

They need to eject all the homosexual Marxists that infiltrated the Church in the 30’s and 40’s who intimidated and bribed the Good-—to restore the Glory of the Church. We need to repair all the Vatican II damage-—all the heresies/errors that entered all the Universities and schools and Churches which ejected Masculinity from the Church.

Get back to curricula prior to 1940’s when the Truth wasn’t being compromised. Bella Dodd, a Communist converted to Catholicism by Abp. Fulton Sheen, gave testimony to the infiltration of the Communists into the Catholic Church—and the Teacher’s Unions, etc. She is an interesting read and was murdered.

Nobody had any doubt that there was a serious gay mafia at the Vatican and virtually in any other place (chanceries, religious orders, etc.) you cared to mention. It was something the Church has had to fight against constantly, because whenever you have a somewhat closed bureaucratic environment where people can get into “amiguismo” (that is, friends appointing friends), you are opening the door to corruption. Sometimes it’s sexual, sometimes it’s financial, sometimes it’s just the losers promoting the losers (thinking of a lot of US bishops - who aren’t gay and aren’t necessarily evil, but are just dumb and lazy...).

But after Vatican II, with the destruction of the power of the bishops and the attempted destruction of the Faith, it became the norm and decent guys who went to seminary had to pick a seminary based on how few gays it had...but they were everywhere. Many good men were driven away.

BXVI obviously realized he didn’t have the strength to fight this, although obviously he had identified it (the report was originally given to him just before he resigned and then he shared it with Francis in a joint meeting).

Pope Francis is like the crazy uncle who says unexpected things at the dinner party, and I think he is exactly the one to break this up.

I’m not Catholic, but a group has to have standards. I respect the Catholic Church for the fact that it does have standards.

But it reduces my respect for Catholicism that it can’t address the huge problem they have had in front of them for decades.

Either become the Gay Church, or fire the homosexuals already.

Sheesh!

I don’t mind homosexuals in my workplace. That’s fine. We’re not organized for the purpose of teaching and demonstrating morality. But the Church is. If you can’t adhere to core principles, fold up the tent and go away.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.