A Solar Deity We Can Believe In

While I was writing this piece, Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. Past winners include mass murdering war criminal Henry Kissinger. So,nothing too surprising there.

Nothing New Under the Sun (Deity)

In the first blog of this series, I laid out some general
foundations of the philosophical/political paradigm that I am currently
using to make sense of this overall reality. To briefly reiterate; most
humans (Americans especially) are woefully unaware of their
multidimensional reality and thus are unable to interact with their
reality in ways that would be beneficial to themselves and the species
and planet as a whole. One of the main reasons for this is that they
have been influenced by a media and education system that has been
designed to promote the agenda of a very small minority of people at
the expense of the remaining majority. Through the media and
educational systems, they have been engineered to become shallow,
uninterested, one-dimensional automatons, completely unaware of their
ignorance and the forces that imprison them physically, mentally,
emotionally, and spiritually and prevent them from achieving their full
potential.

I also spent a good amount of space discussing my
opinion of the office of President of the United States of America, and
it is on this topic that I plan to delve into more deeply in this blog,
particularly our current President, Mr. Barrack Hussein Obama.

There
are many, many reasons why I do not admire, trust, or respect Barrack
Obama, but if I were forced to offer a one sentence explanation, it
would be this: I do not approve of mass murderers, or people who are
accomplices to mass murder. End of story.

An intelligent,
well-informed, non-brainwashed person, upon hearing me say this, would
probably know what I am talking about, agree that they do not like mass
murderers either, and that would be the end of the conversation.
Unfortunately, there are very few people like that in America today.
Most of the people who dislike our current president would prefer a
republican alternative who would end up being directly or indirectly
responsible for even more mass murders.

Of course, they would
never agree that they support mass murder, even though it is exactly
what they are doing. They would ask me what I am talking about, at
which point I would have to go on and explain to them the various
atrocities that are currently being committed by government employees
throughout the world, the war in Afghanistan being one obvious example.

A
lot
of people in this country have been mislead into believing that this is one of those "good" wars, that it is necessary in order to ensure our
safety and the safety of other people around the world. Even some of those who vocally
opposed the War in Iraq, claim that the war we are fighting
in Afghanistan is the
"right war."

Even if you
believe the official cultural myth of the 19 high-jackers and a spooky network of fundamentalist
muslims who "hate freedom" called Al-Qaeda, a little critical thinking
should make you realize that what we have been doing to Afghanistan for
the last 8 years is completely unjustified, and is in fact, nothing
more than mass murder.

Nineteen
men, who weren't even citizens
of that country, secretly concoct and carry out a plan to murder 3,000
Americans, and we reciprocate by killing tens of thousands of people
who had absolutely nothing to do with it. How many times over the last
decade have we seen or read in the
news, "Predator drone kills dozens in northeast Afghanistan, including
large numbers of civilians?" (The answer to that question is not as
often as such things actually happen) We're told that we are killing
all these
people in order to kill the Taliban, and in order to do this we have to
continue killing "large numbers of civilians."

And this is
made
all the more ludicrous by the fact that the Taliban were among numerous other governments and agencies that were warning the U.S. of an attack being planned in Afghanistan. Yes, you read that correctly, the Taliban tried to
warn us that they believed there was some sort of attack being planned
by Al Qaeda, weeks before the attack took place. They then offered to
arrest Osama Bin Laden and turn him over, if the U.S. could provide
convincing evidence that he was in fact responsible. Instead of
even attempting to do this, we chose war. And look where it has gotten
us.

A mass grave for the victims of mass murder in Kunduz.

Now, eight
years later, we are still fighting these same people, the Taliban and
Al Qaeda, or so we are told. But who are these people, really? We have been told that they were nearly wiped out during Operation Enduring Freedom (gotta
love that Orwellian double-speak) but now they've come back, and in order to "win" we are going to need to "escalate" the war. Who are these people that we are fighting now, eight
years later, that supposedly have regained control of 80% of the
country? Where did they come from?

I'm betting this new Taliban (or Talibans, as Brzezinski puts it) are mostly made up of the thousands and thousands of angry fathers,
brothers, and sons who have had their families wiped out by so-called
"strategic air-strikes," who have seen their sons and daughters,
brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers blown to pieces, sometimes
all together in one instant, by one bomb. Imagine walking home to what
used to be your house, only to find a smoldering hole filled with
pieces of what used to be your family. That's who we're fighting, I
mean murdering, right now. This is what is happening in Obama's
"necessary war."

People define murder in different ways, of course.
Usually it just means the intentional killing of a person, but people
kill other people all the time and define their action as
something other than murder - self defense, for instance. Some people
would argue that what our government's military (along with their
enormous, privately contracted army) is doing is self defense. While I do believe that self defense might in some circumstances justify killing a person, it should be used as only as a last resort, and I haven't seen any evidence that what we
are doing in Afghanistan is actually self defense, even If we were to
hypothetically assume that the official 9-11 lie was true. And I'm not
talking about defending our soldiers or "civilian contractors" who are
trespassing on Afghani, Pakistani, Iraqi, or any other foreign soil and killing or are killing or complicit
in the killing of foreign citizens (its not self defense if you break in and the owner of the house has a gun so you kill him)- I'm talking about direct threats to our
"homeland" (to use a term our leaders stole directly from Nazi Germany).
I've heard a lot of politicians like Barrack Obama talk about the
enormous threat we face, but they never really explain what they mean,
or how they know, or who exactly these people are.

Adding to the madness of all of this, is the fact that a lot of the money
that is going to fund the Taliban is coming directly and indirectly from the United States. Most of it is coming from our "civilian" contractors, some of whom are there to install toilets, and some of whom are there for much more nefarious reasons. We're not only fighting all the thousands of people who justifiable are
angry with us for killing their relatives in friends, we're fighting
mercenaries that are directly and indirectly being paid by out of our
own pockets. This shouldn't be surprising, the United States government
and the corporations and people that run it have a long history of
aiding our so-called enemies. Its happened in just about every war we've been involved in, from WWII, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iraq again. As long as the fighting continues,
they're making money. The longer the war drags out, the more money gets paid to the arms manufacturers and other contractors, who care only about profit and couldn't care less about the thousands of dead and wounded.

Look at these children. Thousands of
them have been killed or horrifically maimed, far more than were killed
in the 9-11 attacks. And thousands more will be killed, thanks in large
part to Barrack Obama and the bloodthirsty mass murderers he works for.

These children are not being killed because we are defending ourselves, they are being killed for profit - for natural gas pipelines for energy companies, defense contracts for weapons manufacturers, copious amounts of heroine for the international drug trade (including the CIA and other official and unofficial U.S. agencies), and other "national interests" according to people like Zbignew Brezizinski (See The Grand Chessboard) or Henry Kissinger, or the other Bush neo-cons or Obama neo-liberals (in reality, neo-fascists, each and everyone). But the main reason for all this murder, and for all the wars that have been fought since time immemorial, is the insatiable desire of the ruling class to conquer and own everything. To do this, they engineer wars and murder millions of people.These people couldn't care less about our safety, or the safety of the thousands of brainwashed teenagers we send over their to kill and maim and be killed and maimed.

Obviously Barack Obama doesn't bare the sole responsibility for what is happening. He is, however, responsible for choosing to be a public spokesman for the war, and for the people who are engineering it. He's largely responsible for pitching the idea to the poor, stupid youth of this country that are marching off to die en masse, like he did in Phoenix, Ar(ies)ona a couple of weeks ago when he said that this was "a war of necessity." Bullshit, Mr. President, bullshit. Not one thing in this war is necessary.

Now, apart from Obama being a liar, propaghandist, and accomplice to mass murder and mayhem in Afghanistan, he is also all of these things in Iraq, in Pakistan, and in many other parts of the world including the United States through the theft of trillions of dollars, intentionally engineered economic devastation, pharmacological and biological poisoning, totalitarian police tactics, and so on. I'm sure I'll be going into further detail in later blogs. (Until then, I suggest looking into a few of these things yourselves, if you are unfamiliar or doubt any of this information).

This blog wasn't intended to be about what a bad person the president is, but how he can have so many blind followers regardless of the fact that everything he's done indicates that he works for the the forces of darkness and evil, the true enemies of freedom and all that is good in the universe (Am I being too dramatic?).

The answer is mass manipulation, or mass mind control, or public relations and advertising in the language of people like Edward Bernays (one evil bastard, I recommend BBC's Century of the Self if you are unaware of the name). Americans like Barrack Obama because they have been psychologically conditioned to like him, overtly through media punditry and government propaghanda, and covertly, through nuero-linguistic programming and subliminal or subconscious programming via symbols and imagery.

Think about everything that happens during a campaign speech. Although the words of the speech are important for an analysis, they comprise only one facet of an intricate ritual involving, symbols, signs, chanting, clapping, vocal rhythm and timbre, hand gestures, and so on. All of these things are affecting the way the audience is perceiving the event, and they leave lasting impressions which in turn affects the way they perceive their reality. A speech is really a type of ritual, and rituals are designed to affect or alter their participants in some way, good or bad. The symbols, visual and vocal, play a very important part of this ritual.

The study and use of symbols is a science that is older than writing. To the best of my knowledge, it isn't taught too often in our education system, which isn't surprising because the manipulation of people through symbols is not something that the ruling class wants the masses to know about. Symbols affect the mind on a subconscious level, meaning they can be used to affect people without their awareness. Symbols can be used to connect two concepts subconsciously. A very simple example, Bruce Wayne uses the symbol of a bat when wearing his Batman persona. Bats are considered scary, dark, and mysterious. Although we know that Batman is not a bat, we attribute him with being scary, dark, and mysterious. Thus we have the concept of Bruce Wayne, and the concepts of scary, dark, and mysterious, and we link these concepts together through the symbolism of the bat.

Here is the official logo of the Obama campaign, along with the campaign slogan, "Change we can believe in." By analyzing the symbol and slogan together, we can get a good picture of what concept the public relations/mind control operatives are trying to implant in the public subconscious.

Here we have what appears to most people to be a rising sun. It seems to me that it could as easily be a setting sun, but I think most people perceive it as a rising sun because they have been conditioned to do so.

The reason that most people would agree that Obama's logo depicts a rising sun is that they have consciously or unconsciously accepted the interpretation of the symbol that its creators intentionally designed it to convey. According to wikipedia, that great wellspring of information that has been deemed suitable for public consumption, a rising Sun has traditionally been a symbol of hope. I think most people would agree with this statement, without giving much thought as to the reasons why this would be and when in our deep ancestral past humans first made this connection. Looking back thousands of years and at hundreds, perhaps thousands of different cultures and periods, we can see that this symbolic interpretation is nearly universally accepted.

The rising sun logo also symbolizes change, specifically change for the better. The fact that the sun is rising logically implies movement from from night to day, or darkness to illumination, or for more complex reasons, from ignorance to knowledge, evil to good, or from despair to hope.

Obama's logo was therefore designed to symbolize hope and change (for the better) for the purpose of linking one mental concept, Barrack Obama, to the concepts of hope and change.

In tandem with the visual symbolic programming, the Obama campaign used and still uses nuero-linguistic programming in the forms of written signs and vocal expressions that strengthen the hope-change-obama-sun conceptual link. Throughout the entire scripted media event that was the Obama campaign and election, the words hope and change were repeated with musical and mantra like regularity - rhythm and repetition being two keystone elements of mental manipulation or conditioning. As the mass mind manipulation expert Joseph Goebbels would say, "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." In this discussion the manipulation occurs on a symbolic level rather than through straightforward verbal or written falsehoods, but repetition is still a crucial element.

If you have the patience, watch this or any other Barack Obama campaign speech and note the number of times during the speech the hope-change-obama-sun concept is reinforced through written and spoken words, posters, or visual symbols.

This meme (Richard Dawkins' term, not that I agree with much of what he has to say), this conceptual link of
man-sun-hope-change is by no means a novel development in human
history. It has occured again and again, in thousands of different
forms in the mythical, metaphorical, spiritual, or religious traditions
of our ancestors. We are describing the S(u)n of God, the savior, the
messiah, the light of the world. In the conceptual framework
of Christianity this archetype is manifested as Jesus Christ, whose
halo has served as a powerful symbol (mass-manipulation tool) for
centuries for the Roman Catholic church and other institutions. Other
examples of this (always male, for reasons too complicated to go into
now) archetype are Horus, Mithra, Krishna, Dionysus and many others
(see my blog "The Other Christs" for more info). In esoteric tradition
of Freemasonry, the solar deity is known as Lucifer, the light bearer,
and can also be seen in the character of Hiram Abiff, the widow's son.
For those who don't already have the eyes to see, the political realm
abounds with symbols of freemasonry and other occult "traditions," as I
will show later in this blog and more to follow.

Now,
regardless of how one may feel about the meaning of these
manifestations, be they purely allegorical or examples of actual living
beings, it is safe to say that this archetype has had a very powerful
affect on human experience throughout history. Many profound and beautiful truths can be found in the teachings
attributed to these divine solar beings, if one has the eyes to see. But because of the fact that
this archetype has such a profound effect on human thought, because of
the role it has played and still plays in the evolution of
consciousness, because of its power, it has been manipulated by
mind-controllers throughout history, from the priest classes of ancient
Egypt, Babylon, and Sumer, through the Roman empire and its
continuation in the form of the Catholic church, to the social
engineering public relations machine behind Barrack Obama.

One
very important aspect of this Solar Deity/Christ is the concept of
salvation, which is another link in a very intricate web of
of concepts that make up this archetype. In the rising sun symbol,
salvation is represented by the implied shift from the darkness of
night to the light of morning. Darkness is often associated with
danger, ignorance, and death, and light with peace, knowledge, and
life. Thus we are always looking for "light at the end of the tunnel,"
we are always looking for that salvation which will make our lives
better, and finding it in our chosen solar deity. We are "saved" by the
teachings of christ, and illumined by the knowledge of prometheus, or
lucifer, the morning star.

This aspect of the solar
deity is easily exploited for the manipulation of the masses. At some
point in our lives, we all wish we could be saved from some unfortunate
set of circumstances, we have all wished that some force greater that
ourselves could come to our rescue. Obama's public relations team has
exploited this innate desire to present him as that external force that
is greater than us and that has come to our rescue.

Another concept that is linked to the solar savior archetype is the
idea of "oneness." There is always only "one true god," or "one true
savior," or even "one last hope" for mankind. In the matrix movies
(which are a maze of symbolism and multidimensional meaning) the Neo
character, the savior, is called the one. (One = Neo, get it? Is it
obvious enough?) There is only one Sun in the sky, hence their can only
be one solar savior walking around on the earth (as above, so below).
In a solar savior cult, it is always on one man that all hope for
salvation lies. Looking again at the Obama logo, we see that it is
circular and suggestive of the letter "O", as in "O"bama, the "O"ne. In
the following clip, we see "O"prah Winfrey really laying it on thick:

As for
me, I do not bow to any solar archetype, whether he is Jesus, Lucifer,
or the President of the United States. I believe the only true
salvation lies within, and if you're looking for salvation anywhere
else, you're looking in the wrong place. As the Buddhists say, "if you
see the Buddha on the road, kill him." This statement may seem paradoxical coming from a Buddhist, but they are simply implying that the Buddha(salvation, enlightment, nirvana, heaven) is not on the road, it is not located somewhere that you have to go searching for, it is not something that will come to you in the form of a man given to you like a gift from God. Salvation is something that must be cultivated from within, not received through some external source. It is not something that can be located in a man, hence, any man you meet claiming to be your salvation is not really your salvation.

In the Obama logo,
we see what appears to be a symbolic representation of a sun rising
into a blue sky over a red and white horizon. The fact that the sun
symbol resides in the blue portion of the pin, and that both are
located above the red and white portion, symbolically tells us that red
is subordinate to blue, conceptually linking the battle between light
and dark with the battle between red and blue, republican and democrat.
I believe that there is much more to explore in the symbolic battle of
red and blue and the meaning behind those specific colors, but I won't
delve too far into that yet.

Another concept linked to this
archetype is that of divinity, or god or demigod status. Christ is the
Son of God, he is God or the Holy Spirit incarnate, he is the
embodiment of Love and so on. The monarchical system of the past
several thousand years evolved from the concept of divinity, or God
made flesh, and most importantly, divine blood(lines). In certain
Egyptian periods each succesive pharoah was believed to be the
incarnation of the solar deities Ra, Horus or Aton, and that process
has continued symbolically through today in the symbolism of
political and religious manipulation. In order to keep the bloodlines
"pure," and in order to hoard vast amounts of wealth and power, the
ruling class regularly engaged in what is now called incest or
inbreeding.This practice continued throughout the monarchies and
empires that followed in Europe, America, and much of the rest of the
world, and even today, we can see that most of the ruling elite are
genetically related - Barack Obama is distant cousin to both Bush and
Cheney, who are also cousins of John Kerry, who are both related Jimmy
Carter and the Windsors, and on and on. (geneological research is a bit
too tedious for me at the moment)

Looking through Barrack Obama's extensive armory of symbols, it is
clear that his public relations team have symbolically linked him to
the concept of divinity and salvation. This aspect of divinity, or
super humanness, implies faith, it implies that the deity is question
is in a sense less fallible than a typical human being, though not quite a God. The strength of the solar savior increases and
decreases just as the light of the sun from day to night. A rising
sun indicates increasing power, a setting sun decreasing power, a sun
at its apex indicates victory over the forces of darkness. The solar
savior is forever locked in a battle against darkness, a continuous
cycle of crucifixion and resurrection or death and reincarnation. Thus the solar is savior is always fighting, and is always in danger. (more on that later)

Speaking
of crucifixion, the concept of sacrifice is another facet of the
complex conceptual web that describes the solar deity archetype. The
Gods of the sun-worshiping cultures of the past often demanded or
required sacrifices, sometimes in the form of live human beings. The
solar saviors often died as a sacrifice. Christ was crucified for our
sins, Prometheus was crucified as punishment for bringing knowledge to
men.

Thus it should come as no surprise that the speech and
slogan writers behind Obama often emphasize the need for sacrifice,
especially regarding the "sacrifice of our brave troops" in whatever
war we are fighting. The color of sacrifice is red, as in blood, and we
see that symbolized in Obama's pin with the three red stripes. If the
blue represents the sky, as most people would assume, and the bright
yellow/white semi-circle the sun, then the red and white stripes must
be the earth. Why would the earth be red? Could it represent soil
stained with sacrificial blood?

A Soldier Makes "The Ultimate Sacrifice"

The Body and the Blood

In Catholicism, the sacrifice of Jesus is celebrated in a ritual
called communion. This ritual involves consuming a piece of bread,
which symbolizes Christ's body, and some red wine, which symbolizes
Christ's blood. At one point in the ritual, the communion wafer is held
directly over the chalice, dipped into the wine, and eventually
consumed. If we then symbolically link the red in the Obama logo to the
red, sacrificial communion wine of the Catholic ritual, we can see that
Obama's logo serves as a representation of the communal wafer (the body
of Christ - a solar disk) being dipped into the red wine (the blood of
christ).

I'm sure the number of red and white stripes is
significant. The three red stripes could represent the three nail
wounds of Jesus. Hiram Abiff, a masonic Jesus of sorts, was killed by
three men. As Obama is often compared to JFK (despite having opposite
positions in key policy areas, such as the Federal Reserve, the CIA,
and War Funding), we might symbolically link them to the three rifle
shots of the official assassination myth. Of course, only two are said
to have hit their target.

The link between Obama and
sacrifice or assasination is unsettling. The media has been not so
subtly implanting the idea that Obama's life may be in danger,
particularly from "right wing racist extremists". Regardless of whether
or not it could be, it is beneficial for his image to appear that way,
as this would further strengthen the solar archetype meme. After all,
we have been told all our lives "only the good die young," and we think
of Jesus, John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, John
Lennon, and so on, and they all have been to some degree "deified."

The Obama logo seems to be symbolically telling us (at least our subconscious), quite clearly, that Obama is a solar savior, - that he represents, hope, change, salvation, divinity, and sacrifice. His speeches and slogans tell us the same. His main slogan, "Change we can believe in," works perfectly with the logo in invoking or implanting the solar archetype. The use of the word "believe" is significant (as are all the other words in the slogan), as it can be conceptually linked to faith. Belief does not necessarily require a logical foundation, a step by step process which necessarily leads to such and such a conclusion. A famous "alternative" researcher named Erich Von Daniken, had this to say about belief:

"At question time (at a midewestern technical institute), a student asked me, "Do you really believe in your theory?" As I am convinced of it, I am precluded from believing in it. "Belief" is the prerogative of religions; it is emotional trust in an authority, in a doctrine. In this sense belief simply means that the secret of nature must be accepted as it is. I have to convince by facts, step by step, for I am not the leader of a sect and still less the founder of a religion."

Obama's PR men manipulate symbols and language for the purpose of instilling the "emotional trust" that Von Daniken connects to the concept of belief. This has been done by linking him with the Solar Savior archetype that exists in the collective subconscious of humanity, and therefore in the subconscious of each of us. Obama and the mind control experts backing him are not the first people in history to attempt to do this. In fact, this process has been used by the ruling class to manipulate the lower classes for thousands of years. Below is but one recent example of the use of sun symbolism in politics.

Emblem of a Solar Cult

Whenever an American president is compared to Adolph Hitler in a discussion on mainstream media, the pundits inevitably make a big show of their righteous indignation, regardless of whether such comparisons are merited. The reason being, in my opinion, that the main stream networks do not want you to think about any similarities between the present United States and Germany under the third Reich. Hitler is presented as one of history's lone lunatic dictators, a man who, through sheer sociopathic cunning all his own, seized power and ruled with an iron fist and caused the deaths of millions of people.

In reality Hitler, like Obama, was a puppet of the elite. Without the help of American and British corporations such as IBM, Standard Oil, Ford Motor Company, Union Banking Company and others, Hitler would never have been able to attain so much power. And he would never have been able to control the German masses without his team of propagandists, mind controllers, symbologists, and public relations experts to create elaborate rituals, speeches, slogans, and symbols to manipulate them into a state of emotional trust. The millions would not have died, were it not for their help, too.

Like Obama's team, they chose a solar symbol that would invoke the solar deity archetype - the swastika, which has been used for thousands of years by European and Asian cultures as a sign of the sun, good luck, hope and change for the better. The German masses associated those concepts with Adolph Hitler, and they strongly believed he would lead them into a better world - and of course he, or more correctly the people and corporations that were controlling him, did the exact opposite.

Now, as far as comparisons between an American president and his administration, and Adolph Hitler and his administration, the George W. Bush administration beats Obama's - at least for the time being. Just about everything that happened under Bush was taken right out of the Nazi playbook, the September 11th attacks (the Reichstaag fire), a terrorist threat (communist Jews), the invasions that were justified by the threat, the hasty passage of national security legislation, the creation of a department of homeland security, the increase in executive powers, the suspension of certain legal protections, the increased surveillance and state secrecy, and on and on and on. Crucial to all of these things, in both cases, was that the emotional trust of the public, the blind, unquestioning faith that allowed the deceptions, the loss of freedoms, the mass killings, to go on. The following clip serves as an excellent example:

There are many, many, liberals who would scoff at the robotic pop star's unquestioning faith (whether genuine or scripted) in George W. Bush, without even realizing that they have the same unquestioning faith in Barrack Obama. How many times have you heard someone say something like "Hey, lay off Obama, he's only been in office x amount of months," or "Stop complaining and just let the man do his job" (a recent facebook poll option). Sorry, but "stop complaining and just let the man do his job" is the type of attitude that leads a society straight to totalitarian hell, its the attitude that lets dictators perform mass murder while the masses stand by and do nothing.

I once saw a post that had Obama's picture on it, and next to the picture someone wrote the words "I have hope because of him." Those are the exact words you would expect from someone whose mind has been manipulated by the public relations mind controllers to view Obama as a messianic savior, a solar deity.

Imagine for a moment, that you are viewing the Obama campaign from the perspective of an alien sociologist. You would see a culture where mass numbers of people adorn their property with symbols and phrases that you have learned are associated with one man. You would see the symbols on their cars, their houses, their desks, their clothing. They watch the man on TV and on the internet, they read about him in the newspapers and magazines and books. Whenever the man appears in public, large crowds of people show up to see him. They rhythmically chant his name while holding his symbols over their heads. They respond to every word with applause or chanting. Some are overcome with emotion, some faint. What would you think was going on?

Obviously you would think that the man's followers were members of some religious cult or sect, that this man was being worshiped as a god or saint of some kind, and that speeches and ceremonies were religious rituals. Perhaps you would see a war and think that the thousands of uniformed men that marched off to murder people were conducting human sacrifices to him. If you happened to have observed the symbolism of other past or present cultures, you would note the similarities of the symbols and rituals surrounding other deified men throughout history. Of particular interest would be the ritual that we call the "inauguration" ceremony.

Monuments of a Solar Cult

See this fascinating blog and others for more information: http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=1734

This ritual takes place every four years on the steps of the Capital
building in Washington D.C., and is a maze of symbolism. The entire
mall complex is of freemasonic design down to the orientation of the
streets. The crowd gathers under the obelisk, which as its shape
suggests, is an ancient phallus symbol used in solar cults for
thousands of years. The pathways around it form a vesica piscis, which
as its shape suggests, is symbolic of a vagina. The combination of the
two, obelisk and vesica piscis, symbolizes the act of sexual
intercourse (yes, it means the exact same thing in St. Peter's Basilica
in Rome), the joining of the masculine sun energy with the feminine
earth energy. This symbolic sexual act produces an offspring - the
solar savior archetype, and we see this in the dome of the capital
building, which symbolizes the pregnant womb of the earth goddess. The
ritual begins with the soon to be inaugurated/crowned president/messiah
emerging from the womb, through a door (vagina again) to greet the
crowd of supporters/worshipers. It is the ritual of the birth of a
solar savior archetype, and I'm sure its been repeated millions of
times in one form or another, for egyptian pharoahs, catholic popes,
European monarchs (Louis the IV of France, known as the "Sun King, and
anyone else wearing a solar crown"), and other patriarchs throughout
the ages. It is told in the mythology of Osiris (Father god), Isis
(Mother god), and Horus (S(u)n God), and all the other stories of
miraculous births and immaculate conceptions of past and present
religions. Everything about the symbolism tells us that the man being
inaugurated is not just a man, but a divine being, a man born of the
gods.

Sweet Baby Barry! Sun of Promise, Child of Hope! Amen! (Amun-Ra!)

Excerpt - "Even God himself talks to Barry while he's in church on Sunday, telling him: "Look around you. Now look to me. There is hope enough here to last a lifetime."

The purpose, or one of them anyway, of all of this
symbolism is to program the human mind subconsciously to accept Barack
Obama as a savior, to create what is often described as "a cult of
personality" around him, to create that blind, unquestioning, powerful,
emotional trust that overwhelms rationality.

Obama is not a
savior, he is a just a corrupt politician who has gone to extreme
lengths to convince you that he is one, to a greater degree than I've
seen in any other President or candidate in recent memory, and I find
this fact very disturbing. As I have argued and will doubtlessly
continue argue, Barrack Obama is a tool of the elite globalist network
that I may refer to with names such as the establishment, the new world
order, the illuminati, the elite. Most, if not all, of his appointments
have been members of the Bilderberg group, the Council on Foreign
Relations, and the Trilateral Commission. Obama represents their
interests, and it is his job to sell you the wars, the oppressive laws
and programs (including the incredibly dangerous vaccination program of
which I hope to write more about shortly, for now all I can say is,
don't take it, research whats in it and why), and to distract you with
smokescreens such as global warming. Our population is being socially
engineered on a level we have rarely seen except in some of the most
extreme totalitarian societies in history, to accept him as an
archetypal god-like entity, at a time when we are quickly becoming a
totalitarian state. This should disturb anyone who cares about
physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual freedom. If you are a
christian Obama supporter, this high-jacking of spiritual symbolism for
the use of promoting a false messiah should cause you some concern, as
you may have been duped into accepting a new solar savior. If you're a
proclaimed atheist and Obama supporter, you might want to consider that
you too have been duped into joining a religion of sorts. Once again, hordes of blind followers have been tricked into joining a cult of personality, and embracing yet another false messiah and establishment puppet, another purveyor of false hope. There truly is nothing new under the Sun.

In this blog here, I am going to share with you my thoughts on Rihanna's music video, "Rock Star 101 (featuring Slash). There are a lot of people out there who have reached the same conclusions I have regarding the...