Deciding the Corporate Open Source To Be An Oxymoron

The sponsorship of open source technology is not only confined to a few reasons but, the diversity of genuine reasons range from coverage of code testing to direct monetization to community development has given it so much motivation.

As told by Bryan Cantrill, products had sponsorships which were hitched to the open source community train. In the past, it is been noticed that a philosophical divide has come up in the concept of releasing a product in an open source license. There can be a limit made on the consumption of computer components under the licensing agreement. The similar indignities are suffered by the open source software and commercial software buyers under the direct monetization model.

One of the flows in the model divides the factors like open source camp and enterprise camp. So, the question is how companies can give ROI to its shareholders by sponsoring an open source technology. Therefore, the goals and sharing of profit must be clear.

After that the focus was on providing valuable services to the customers by high performance cloud infrastructure. Then the though process begin to make the cloud offerings more appealing for the customers. A differentiation and comparison can be seen between source Java and Sun Microsystem.

To improve on the system, it was decided to use them on its own and develop it further. Node.js was then developed with the newly created modules which included Mark Cavage’s node restify and Trent Mick’s node bunyan. One can enjoy different functions if played with different devices. Node.js is right model which can be used by the users and is a win for them.

ITBusinessPlus.com partners with clients to create and deliver world-class technology – related content necessary to make right decisions, at every step. We leverage thought leadership, management insight and expertise of our business review authors to share solutions