http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
MARCH IS WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH, and much attention is being paid in schools and forums to two women who were most influential in creating this nation's feminist movement while combating sexism in all its forms.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton organized the first women's rights convention in Seneca Falls, N.Y., in 1848. Her persistent ally was Susan B. Anthony, a founding officer of the National Woman Suffrage Association in 1869.

Both were the subjects of a Public Broadcasting System documentary last November. It was called "Not for Ourselves Alone: The Story of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony," and has been repeated since.

Both women were unremitting opponents of abortion. Yet that fundamental element of their lives was omitted from this widely publicized and reviewed, but selective, documentary.
It was as if a televised life of Dr. Martin Luther King focused entirely on him as a fighter for civil rights without a word about his lifelong commitment to direct-action pacifism as taught by Gandhi and the American minister A.J. Muste, who first -- as Dr. King told me -- convinced him of the power of nonviolence.

Ken Burns, who has created deeply illuminating television series on subjects such as the Civil War and baseball, was the director and co-producer of "Not for Ourselves Alone." He is now completing what will be the most definitive documentary series on jazz in international television history. I have seen some of it; and, judging by the expertise of the person who interviewed me for it, I am sure it will equal Burns' Civil War project.

Why, then, did Ken Burns remove from "Not for Ourselves Alone" Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton's passionate descriptions of abortion as "child murder" and "infanticide?" And why did none of the reviews of the documentary I saw in the mainstream press mention this distortion of the record of these original feminists?

I asked Ken Burns if he had known of their pro-life views. "Yes," he said unhesitatingly. "But I thought it really important to show the connection between the women's and the abolitionist movements. How Frederick Douglass, for instance, so strongly stood up for women's right to vote."

"But in your research," I told Burns, "you couldn't have missed how often and fiercely they fought against abortion." Burns did not deny that they did, but he insisted that what he calls "the largest social transformation in American history" should not, in his documentary, have been "burdened by present and past differing views on choice."

I respect Burns a great deal, but his use of the word "choice" indicates to me where he's coming from on the subject of abortion. Both Anthony and Stanton believed unequivocally that in an abortion the unborn child does not have a choice of whether to continue living.

Feminists for Life of America, an organization based in Washington, D.C., has protested this exclusion of a belief that meant so much to Anthony and Stanton. Feminists for Life of America believes in the idea of the "seamless garment." That is, it's pro-life across the board, opposing abortion, capital punishment, assisted suicide and euthanasia. And it works through Congress for the rights of the poor and against domestic violence.

Feminists for Life of America provided Ken Burns -- before "Not for Ourselves Alone" was aired -- with substantial research documenting the pro-life views of Stanton and Anthony. For example:
Susan B. Anthony on abortion: "The woman is awfully guilty who commits the deed. It will burden her conscience in life. It will burden her soul in death."

Elizabeth Cady Stanton: "When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit."

"There must be a remedy even for such crying evil as this (abortion). But where shall it be found? At least, where begin, if not in the complete enfranchisement and elevation of women."

There was much more documentation of their beliefs, but none of it got into "Not for Ourselves Alone."

In all of the lectures, newspaper articles, broadcasts and classroom discussions during Women's History Month this March and beyond, I wonder whether any of the tributes to Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton will include their pro-life convictions. Were they still here, I think they would have picketed the showing of "Not for Ourselves
Alone."

JWR contributor Nat Hentoff is a First Amendment authority and author of numerous books. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

03/20/00: Should there be a chaplain in Congress?03/13/00: Big labor, big China, spinning Gore03/03/00: The ACLU violates its principles --- yet again!02/28/00: Still two nations?02/11/00: You bet we should disbar Bubba01/31/00: Where was Jesse?01/24/00: Is suing church for sexual harassment an entanglement?01/18/00: Will Miranda make it?01/11/00: ACLU: Guilty until presumed innocent?01/03/00: Liberty lion should be Man of Century12/28/99: Drug tests that tear families apart12/20/99: Get ready for decisive ruling on school vouchers for religious schools12/13/99: Guess who is taking the lead in anti-slavery movement? Hint: It ain't Rev. Jesse12/06/99: When we refuse to buy the 'otherly-challenged' excuse11/29/99: Expelling 'Huck Finn' 11/22/99: Pleading the First11/16/99: Goal of diversity needs rethinking?11/08/99: Prosecution in darkness11/02/99: The accuracy that's owed to readers10/26/99: Disappeared Americans10/18/99: The blue wall of silence10/11/99: Bill Bradley's speech tax10/04/99: 'Technicalities' that keep us free09/27/99: Our 'Americanism'-ignorant generation 09/20/99: ACLU better clean up its act09/13/99: A professor of infanticide at Princeton09/07/99: The Big Apple's Rotten Policing08/23/99: Lawyerly ethics08/16/99: To Get a Supreme Court Seat08/02/99: What are the poor people doing tonight?07/26/99: Lady Hillary and the press