The recent arrest of drug-candidate of the ruling party PAN and the PRD socialist State government tourist Quintana Roo, Gregorio Sánchez Martínez, has become a political bombshell in Mexico and the United States:

1 .- It has uncovered links between intelligence officials of the Castro dictatorship in Cuba, with drug gangs operating in Mexico.

2 .- He has revealed to the intelligence analysts in both countries and behind the international campaign against the so-called Law Arizona narco gangs are responsible for communist infiltration from Mexico on U.S. soil by illegal Cuban, Chinese and Russian .

3 .- It has validated the hypothesis of intelligence centers, in the sense that one of the objectives of the Cuban intelligence is “sowing” in Mexican territory Castro agents who, whether through marriage to citizens of this country or through the nationalization process, looking to enter the political organs of Mexico to crew in their interests.

4 .- It has demonstrated the desire of the Castro to manipulate the domestic politics of Mexico, claim that a Cuban wife of Gregorio Sánchez Martínez drug candidate, ie, Niurka Saliva Alba Benitez become “candidate” to “governor” of the Mexican state of Quintana Roo, while her husband kept under judicial process. What started out to be the “first lady” of the state.

Do not forget significant elements:

* Niurka, the wife of the candidate drug PAN-PRD alliance government of Quintana Roo, is the daughter of Jose Angel Pino Saliva, Interior Ministry colonel in Cuba, who works for the intelligence services (intelligence) of the Castro regime.

*There are testimonies that the same Niurka is directly involved with the infiltration of illegal Cubans, Russians and Chinese to the United States via Mexico:

“Greg’s wife, Niurka Saliva Alba Benítez, taking advantage of Cuban origin, was responsible to contact their countrymen and their families in the United States, who asked him to pay them out of the island.

“Along with working Niurka Valley Boris Alonso, who was a member of Los Zetas. Puma also participated, a member of the police force in the city of Cancún, who was in charge of the Plaza de Los Zetas. Boris had income accounting of illegal Russians, Chinese and Cubans, as by nationality he had to deliver a timely payment to Puma. “

* In addition, it has also found that t he security adviser narco-PRD PAN candidate Greg, the son of a former interior minister in Cuba.

* You must be mentioned that ” in 2004, Greg was chargedin Chiapas, homicide and robberyviolence. Greg’s siblings: David, and Daniel Feliciano, defendants serving time for activities related to organized crime. Always, as Castrillon and his story, Magdalena Sanchez, Greg’s sister, was arrested at the airport in Mexico City with her husband and $ 300,000 whose origin could not verify. “

From the foregoing, the intelligence analysts agree:

a) Greg was shielded by Castro’s Cuban intelligence.

b) The links below which seemed to be subject to that, they were betrothed, emotional and economic.

c) The coverage has been offered the ruling party PAN, is a product of innocence, naivete presidentre settled formal, visible, of the party, César Nava and those who advise and promote.

d) It is clear that legal action against the drug candidate had decided not to exercise, as evidenced by the time he had been asleep denunciation against him, against his wife and against others involved, by the protected witness. And they own statement corroborates the Secretary of the Interior (Interior) of Mexico, Fernando Gómez Mont, in the sense that the leftist PRD, had been informed of the investigation long ago.

e) Otherwise, skip a serious, embarrassing question: so much since Greg was framed by the protected witness, and immediately after the results of financial investigations, prosecutors and family members confirmed their involvement with organized crime, was not logical to assume that both the Ministry of the Interior (Fernando Gomez Mont) and the Ministry of Public Security (Genaro Garcia Luna) and the Ministry of Finance (Ernesto Cordero Arroyo), to inform both President Felipe Calderon Cesar Nava of the risk, inconvenience, to make the party a candidate narcopolitics PAN official?

f) Do not be assumed that all the secretaries of state engaged in such research the information you hid Felipe Calderón? “I deliberately hid the data to the nominal president, visible, PAN, Cesar Nava? The latter can not believe it, because the interior minister himself, Gomez Mont said that some time ago and had informed the PRD of investigations.

Well, ladies and gentlemen, then we got to the final question: why, if at Los Pinos, the PAN and the PRD was known about the investigations, PAN and PRD insisted on keeping the candidacy of narco?

But worse still:

What did turn back the government secrecy surrounding the background and narcocandidato clandestine operations of the PAN-PRD and its association with the cartels linked to the intelligence community-Castro Cuba? What forced them to stop the narcocandidato, even at the expense of the prestige of the ruling party?

* OWNER OF THE MEXICAN “AMERICA MOVIL” GET WITH PORTUGUESE AND SPANISH

* EMPLOYERS SURPRISE AND DISPLEASURE, WHO FEAR “INSIDE INFORMATION”

Every day that passes, the world’s richest Mexican, Carlos Slim, surprising both European entrepreneurs as well as teachers of Business Ethics of the most prestigious universities in the world with their movement to expand its economic tentacles.

In Spain, for example, businessmen ranging from surprise to surprise with the actions of Slim.

The 1st Without being in possession of most of the shares, entered the board of the Spanish consortium Criteria, which is the main shareholder of TELEFONICA, turn the main competitor of America Movil, Slim’s company in the field of mobile phone.

(In Mexico, operating TELEFONICA MOVISTAR. And in that country, both companies have had serious confrontations, not only commercial, but even legal in nature. How is it possible, then, that Slim is now associated with the holder of the largest firm part of the shares of Telefónica).

Well, if this situation was surprised and raised serious questions among scholars of business ethics, it is now, Slim has gone a step further forward, which caused not only confusion but also unpleasant comments. It is apparent that …

The 2ndwas learned that Carlos Slim is buying shares of the company telephone Lusa de PORTUGAL TELECOM, which in turn competes with Spanish TELEFONICA by the Brazilian made LIVE.

In fact, the Spanish Telefonica (Movistar) has offered a Portuguese PORTUGAL TELECOM a great price to buy 50% of the shares held by Brazil’s VIVO.

The European business community are asking how can she do that?

Specialists in business ethics in Spain and the United States have written e-mail to this columnist to ask:

* Slim How can you make that?

* What is it not ethical?

* How did you first enter the Governing Body of the main shareholder of its competitor, the Spanish-TELEFONICA MOVISTAR, then leaving with it too will enter the council PORTUGAL TELECOM Portuguese, Spanish main competitor?

* What is it?

What such a move perhaps not to compete unfairly, since possess inside information to benefit personal interests?

In short, you and I can have our own point of view, but those are the questions that we did yesterday. We share with you. What do you think?

* THE CURRENT ‘OAS’ CONDEMNATION OF CASTRO AND CHAVEZ FOR VIOLATING RIGHTS

* THIS WEEK: REPRESSION AND DEATH IN CUBA; REPORT AGAINST CHAVEZ

Create a “new OAS without U.S. participation and Canada, is not in itself a breakthrough, but can become a serious political setback:

1 .- Only benefits the Castro dictatorship,

2 .- Give certificate of naturalization to the daily violation of basic human rights that is occurring in countries with governments openly Communist ideology, like Cuba and Venezuela, for example, and

Indeed, in Cancun was a meeting of Presidents. There, the government of Felipe Calderón led the demand to create a new agency that brings together Latin American countries, but without the assistance of the United States and Canada.

This proposal has been presented as a victory, actually seems a step backwards. For those who have forgotten the history, we must remember that 48 years ago in Punta del Este, Uruguay, held the Eighth Meeting of Consultation of Ministers of the Organization of American States and it was agreed during the expulsion of the Castro government agency, under the incompatibility of libertarian principles and purposes of the American system.

The meeting took place in January 1962, perhaps when many of us were born or were very young.

The clear human rights violations practiced by the dictatorship of the Castro brothers – Fidel and Raul – due to the avowedly Marxist-Leninist orientation of his government, prompted the regime imposed by force of arms in Cuba was expelled from OAS.

It was an action against the Cuban people, but against the Castro dictatorship.

From there, repeatedly, the customary violation of human rights by the Castro dictatorship, was documented, approved and ordered by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

The aforementioned American Commission on Human Rights of the OAS condemned not only Cuba, but other governments, according to allegations, investigations conducted by specialists and final evaluations of its members, which appear in their so-called “Reports”.

The fundamental rights recently led to the same American Commission on Human Rights of the OAS to condemn such practices of the government of Hugo Chávez. Without going any further, just today, Thursday 25 February 2010, gave to light a voluminous report of 319 pages, which you realize that in Venezuela “is being used the punitive power of the State to intimidate or punish persons under their political opinion. “

The same Report of the OAS expresses the clear violations of personal freedom in exercising their rights, such as speech, such as disseminating ideas and information, and how “a pattern of impunity in cases of violence” against people who disagree with the Marxist-Leninist government of Chavez.

Reports by human rights violation, annoy dictatorial governments. Thus the Venezuelan people have demanded the presence of OAS commission to give an independent account of the violation of their rights by Chavez, as revealed by the photograph reproduced in one of the many marches against the Venezuelan dictator. That is why a “new OAS without U.S. and Canada,” can produce two immediate effects of negative character:

A) gives a certificate of naturalization to dictators in the middle of democratic governments, and

B) for eliminating surveillance on respect for human rights.

The pretext is “unity.”

Curious, significantly, the proclamation of “the new OAS without the U.S. and Canada” arrived at the same time when the Castro dictatorship was condemned by the United States and European countries, due to the death of a respected human rights defender in Cuba,Orlando Zapata Tamayo, on Tuesday 23 February this year after a hunger strike for 80 days.

As if that were not enough above, the Castro ordered the arrest of dozens of opposition during the Wednesday 24, with the purpose that had not come to the funeral of Zapata Tamayo.

It is clear that any such actions would no longer be neither investigated nor sanctioned by a“New OAS without the U.S. and Canada”, because the Castro, Chavez, Evo Morales, Kirchner and the other way would create institutions to their advantage, for their benefit. No one to “scold”.

The PAN government of Felipe Calderón, has sided: in the country, opposing abortion and simulates unions between same sex, but outside its territory, backs calls abortion and gay marriage.

The facts speak louder than any words.

1 .- Some weeks ago – as we released here the past 17 January – The Mexican government endorsed the United Nations Organization a proposal encouraged by abortion and homosexual lobbies. The attitude of the PAN system generated strangeness to worldwide, prompting talk of a real betrayal of nations “Catholic” within the UN.

2 .- But it is worse. It turns out that the representation of the Mexican government was one that chastised this week the government of Nicaragua, within the Human Rights Commission of the UN, not to approve of abortion.

It turns out that the government of Nicaragua stated, through its Minister of Interior (or Internal), Ana Isabel Morales Mazún, the opposite of that Central American country to legalize the crime being committed to the elimination of an innocent and helpless, that is, by abortion in all its variants. Given this situation, the representation of the government of Felipe Calderón called for legal reform in that nation to decriminalize abortion.

The position taken by the representative of the Calderon confirms the attitude suspicious of Mexico’s ruling party, the PAN, attempting to confuse Catholics and the Catholic Church as a whole, with the approval of constitutional amendments in 17 states of Mexico, where in a misleading way – as demonstrated here and in the prestigious and influential legal journal Iustitiae Sacerdos – is decriminalizing abortion and obligates states to provide support “comprehensive” (sic) to the abortionists, while registration is in the legal recognition to life merely written from conception until death.

The Mexican government’s actions leave no doubt about the break with the Catholic electorate.

But ideological support the transfer taking place in Mexico’s ruling party, which officially is a member of the Christian Democratic International, but in practice is alienated to the International Socialist or Social Democracy.

Now we understand why the PAN has been aggressively seeking an alliance with the socialist PRD in elections to be held this year in Mexico to renew state government …?

On 8 February this 2010, it was the best day of Mexican President Felipe Calderón, whose statements hasty deserves two corrections:

1 .- The Secretary of the Interior (or Internal), Fernando Gomez Mont, was forced to offer apologies to the parents of more than a dozen young Mexicans who were killed a year ago by suspected drug traffickers, President Calderón had called the victims as “gang”, which triggered widespread protest of the population in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua state.

2 .- The same day, the doctor who attended the famous singer Michael Jackson was indicted for causing the death of pop idol.

The determination of the U.S. authorities, after numerous tests and deep investigations, was also a lie to Mexican President Felipe Calderón, who had claimed that Jackson had died of his alleged addiction to drugs, as can be heard on the video link we post.

The research seems to reveal that the head of the singer’s death was her doctor, who certainly has pleaded not guilty.