Forbidden Root brewpub vote breaks precedent

The East Village Association will vote Monday on a proposal that would allow the Forbidden Root brewery to locate and operate in East Village. A vote to allow the brewpub would change a position EVA has supported since 1992: to maintain liquor moratoria on parts of Division Street and Damen and Chicago avenues.

The board’s decision to schedule a vote was not made lightly and was made only after a great deal of thought and deliberation. Neither the board nor its Planning, Preservation & Development committee is recommending how members should vote.

The decision was made as a result of unique set of circumstances.

A significant number of our members and others in the community expressed a desire to reconsider the liquor moratorium to allow the Forbidden Root brewery to locate on Chicago Avenue. And despite a written commitment by Ald. Proco Joe Moreno to not lift any liquor moratorium anywhere within the boundaries of the East Village Association, he's expressed a desire to lift this moratorium. Therefore, the board's asking the general membership to consider whether to oppose the lifting of the tavern moratorium on Chicago Avenue between Wood Street and Ashland Avenue.

A membership vote not to oppose his action would constitute the East Village Association's partial release of Ald. Moreno from his written pledge regarding liquor moratoria. The release of this written commitment would be limited to this stretch, the single tavern moratorium and subject to the continued alderman's written commitment in other areas.

This issue raises a number of concerns. Our board members were concerned this decision would be interpreted as a lack of respect for EVA's commitment to a long-standing position on liquor licenses, or that the decision was made out of political expediency. However, these concerns were outweighed by our desire to be representative. By being democratic, we believe the East Village Association stays relevant and engaged with our members and community. EVA continues in its mission to plan for the maintenance and improvement of both the physical and social environment of the community.

The deliberation around this proposal and the East Village Association's input has resulted once again in a proposal that is far better for the community than was originally presented. After significant negotiations with the owners of Forbidden Root and their lawyer, Forbidden Root agreed to a number of controls on its operation. Forbidden Root would agree to Type 1 zoning, a plan of operation and abandonment of their request to lift the package liquor moratorium.

It's now up to the membership to decide whether these controls justify a zoning change and lifting of the tavern moratorium. Please come to the May 5 meeting to vote on this proposal, at 7pm in the Happy Village at 1159 N. Wolcott. The East Village Association is only as strong as its members, and your participation is important.

This has been brought up before, but I would once again like to propose expanding the east village association membership borders. Residents who live only a block or two south of Chicago Avenue should have the right to vote on issues that affect both sides of Chicago Avenue.

So you had them drop their request to sell bottles of their own product from their own place of business? Any idea what that does to their margins? My advice: get the hell out of the way and let these guys do what they need to bring life back to this area. There's a difference between a high-concept microbrewery and a dirty corner liquor store selling nips and 40s. If you can't see it and stand behind that logic, I suggest finding an optometrist to fill out one of your (many) vacant properties. Might do you all some good.

pschneid you are wrong and nobody compared Forbidden Root to a dirty corner liquor store. The proposal does not bar them from selling bottles of their own product. The idea is to allow Forbidden Root and avoid other inconsistent uses for Chicago Avenue. Read some of the earlier posts and you will understand.

Not my neighborhood and I understand why they have a ban on taverns since 1992 in order to clean up the neighborhood. That said, times are changing and I think this would be a nice addition to a neighborhood that definitely needs more investment.