Hi Craig,
> And fields() has type String[ ]. Now that we have the ability to put
> a name into Property and Field, should we change String[ ] fields()
> default { }
When specifying an index/unique with fields (or properties) would anyone
specify more than just the field names? The field itself is defined elsewhere
and they only need give a reference to it. Think that was the reason I used
--
Andy (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)