No, no! Its not us, we are not in the defend Todd Standing Camp. In fact, he is one of only two individuals we continually mock here at Bigfoot Lunch Club; Tom Biscardi and Todd Standing. These two controversial characters are considered hoaxers by some, and there is not much tolerance for hoaxers in this community of Sasquatch searchers. Nor should there be.

With that said, we also know how smart our fans are and they can form their own opinions. At our site, Richard Stubstad takes the time to write a letter and defend portions of Todd Standings research/evidence.

The gist of his letter is Adrian Erickson bought all of Todd Standing’s films and material and that is why his site and youtube channel disappeared. We have mentioned our concern with with the Erickson project purchasing Standing’s materials before.

Regarding Todd Standing. I’m mildly surprised Loren would put up the post then again it’s Loren’s Blog so he can post what he sees as interesting to his readers.

Carl Sagan is quoted as saying that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And so it is with Sasquatch. Todd hasn’t presented any reasonable evidence to back up his claims of finding old hairy.

Now if you’ll notice Professor Meldrum in his writings and lectures never claims to have evidence for the proof of the existence of Bigfoot. However, several times he does state the circumstantial and scientific evidence justifies a serious scientific investigation into the subject or the possible existence of the species.

This is the responsible way to research the subject. Any evidence gathered can be measured against Professor Meldrum’s evidence except for a specimen of the species.

Todd Standing doesn’t cut it so he joins Hoaxer Biscardi on the list of people to ignore along with Cliff Crook and the late EB. Just my opinion and my best.

Regarding Todd Standing. I’m mildly surprised Loren would put up the post then again it’s Loren’s Blog so he can post what he sees as interesting to his readers.airforce47

Larry,

Firstly, Loren does not write every post here at Cryptomundo, nor does he own the site.

Myself, and several others, post blog entries here at Cryptomundo.

This blog post was authored by Guy Edwards, as an excerpt from his blog, the Bigfoot Lunch Club.

Carl Sagan is quoted as saying that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And so it is with Sasquatch. Todd hasn’t presented any reasonable evidence to back up his claims of finding old hairy.airforce47

The blog post was about someone else that wrote an email to Guy defending Standing.

I think people should just look at the video created by Standing which I found here:

In my opinion this does not look real to me at all and it looks like a mockumentary. Maybe Standing is just testing people’s gullibility and trying to get a rise out of sasquatch investigators. I don’t know how anyone can take anything Standing says at face value. He looks like he can’t keep a straight face when he is telling his story.

Word of warning there is a lot of swearing in this video so sensitive people please be aware.

This guy seems to me to be a very sad individual who just wants attention or is just having fun raising the ire of the sasquatch investigative community.