You wrote that only a small percentage of Muslims
support Bin Laden and stated: “The essence of Bin Ladenism is simple: I
am right and everybody else is wrong. Those who are wrong must either
submit to us or be murdered.”

Is that Bin Ladensim or is that Muhammadanism?
Isn’t this exactly what Kotham, a.k.a. Muhammad said? Didn’t Muhammad
say everyone must submit to me or be murdered? Doesn’t the very word
Islam mean submission?

Dear Mr. Taheri, you know that there is no such thing
as Bin Ladenism. Bin Laden is a Muslim. He does not have a school of
thought of his own. Bin Laden is a follower of Muhammad. He is trailing
HIS footsteps, doing what HE did and emulating HIS examples. Why not call
a spade as spade? Like Bin Laden, all Muslims follow Muhammad, albeit not
all of them with the same zealotry that he does, nonetheless they all
share the same philosophy.

Fallaci says there is a Muslim conspiracy to conquer
Europe
and destroy Western civilization. You deride her and claim that she is
lying and exaggerating. Yes of course if Fallaci says there are 25 million
Muslims in America
she is grossly exaggerating. This looks more like a typo. The actual
number is no more than 2.5 million. However, is she lying about the
plan of Islam to take over the world? This is what all the Islamists are
saying. How can YOU, among all the people question that? You know Islam
intends to dominate the world or don’t you?

You say there is no conspiracy among the Muslims and
rightly argue that Muslims do not even talk to each other. This is true.
Perhaps “conspiracy” is not the right word; but conquering the world
for Islam and making it dominant is the Master Plan of Islam drawn by
Muhammad himself. Every person who submits to Islam, irrespective of his
denomination, which sect or school of law he belongs, subscribes to this
Master Plan and becomes a pawn working towards its realization. Exactly
one year ago, in an article entitled “Islam
and Democracy: The Impossible Union”, you yourself convincingly
argued that Islam is not compatible with democracy. Doesn’t’ this
imply that Islam does not believe in pluralism and does not tolerate other
beliefs and opposing ideas? Doesn’t this mean that in case Muslims
become the majority in any country they will immediately subdue the
minority and establish their own dictatorial rule? Why should the
Europeans not be concerned about the increase of the Muslim immigrants in
their countries, then?

You make Fallaci look as if she is a paranoid
islamophobe when she says; Muslims will turn beautiful European and
American cites into casbahs and that they have instructions to produce
large numbers of children. You wonder how she can say this at a time when
most Western nations are in demographic decline.

The truth is that Muslims do convert beautiful
European and American cities into casbahs. As a matter of fact some Muslim
quarters in the heart of the European cities have become so dangerous that
the locals, especially non-Muslim women, do not dare to go alone.

Khaled Ahmad, a Pakistani journalist in 2001 gave a
very bleak picture of Pakistanis in Britain, which by then had reached
700.000. He
wrote:

"The figure of 700,000 has grown from 5000 in
1951. Today, because of high birth-rate, fully 47 percent of them are
under the age of 16, as compared to 17 percent for whites. They have the
highest unemployment rate, five times more than the British average; and
crime rate is higher among them than in any other community. Fully 2
percent of the prisoners rotting in British jails are Pakistanis, the
highest for any one community."

Khaled Ahmad states, "Expatriate Muslims integrate less well with
host societies than other expatriate communities." and affirms that
studies indicate the higher level of integration achieved by the Indian
community.

You condemn Fallaci for saying Muslims procreate like
rats. Again this is not a secret. All you have to do is to count how many
children the hijabi Muslimahs trail along when they stroll in the European
cities. These little Muslims are often maintained through welfare. Their
food is paid by non-Muslim taxpayers' money. But they are also fed with
the hatred of non-Muslims and grow determined to subdue their hosts into
dhimmitude.Is there an Islamic
order to be polyfiloprogenitive and take over the world by outnumbering
the non-Muslims? Sure there is. Here is the order:

"A man came to the Prophet and said: I have
found a woman of rank and beauty, but she does not give birth to children.
Should I marry her? He said: No. He came again to him, but he prohibited
him. He came to him third time, and he (the Prophet) said: Marry women who
are loving and very prolific, for I shall outnumber the peoples by
you." Abu
Dawud 11.2045

The advice to marry women who are loving, is
irrelevant. Sterile women can also be loving. What Muhammad is saying is
go and reproduce like rats and take over the world for me, make mention of
me, worship me, love me, because my humongous ego craves insatiably for infinite
narcissistic supplies.

Note that Muhammad is not saying go a teach my
message to others like Jesus and Buddha said. He does not give a hoot
about teaching. He knows no one would listen to his gobbledygook. He did not
bring any teaching. His teaching consists in "believe in me".
That is his teaching. All he cared was that people recognize him as a
messenger of God, love him, respect him, obey him. All a narcissist cares
for is to become God. All he wants is domination. He wants to conquer the
world. For Muhammad monotheism was just an excuse. He was ready to
compromise even on that, as is shown when he revealed the Satanic verses
and then realized this would undermine his entire claim and retracted.

You say there is no “Muslim world” as such. I
agree; Muslims do not have a central authority that could decide for and
represent all of them. The same can be said about Christians or other
religions. However, all
the Muslims follow one single script and that is the Quran. They all
subscribe to that book, irrespective of how moderate or extremists they
are. The Quran is the common ground for all the Muslims - the Sunna is
another unifying point. Muslims don’t need a living authority to tell
them what they should do. They all follow the Quran and there they find
their inspiration and guidance. Islamic terrorism, does not derive from
Bin Ladenism, it derives from Muhammadanism. It is inspired by the
Quran.

You accuse Fallaci for becoming a hardcore pro American
after being a leftist anti American during her entire journalistic career. Well,
shouldn’t she be praised for being able to learn new things and change her mind?
Haven’t you changed our views ever? I know I have. I have changed my
views drastically and I am not embarrassed to admit it. In fact I am proud
of it. Supple minds change; it is the fossilized minds that are unable to
change.