On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:40:47 -0800, Charles McCathieNevile
<chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:54:31 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
> wrote:
>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 15:19 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> Doug, All - as a followup to the short conversation on October 31 re
>>> moving the traversal part of Element Traversal to DOM4, do you have
>>> any thoughts on what, if anything, should be done?
>>
>> Is there any reason that more than pasting it into DOM4 plus whatever
>> stylistic arrangements the editor likes would be needed?
>
> None that I can see, and no reason not to do that that I can think of.
FWIW, this has been done long ago. I think the question was more what we
want to do with the Element Traversal document itself.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/