Fr. Francis D’Britto is the second person- the first was British-born 17th-century missionary priest Fr Thomas Stevens- to have translated the Bible into Marathi.

The priest is the first to get the award that was constituted in 2007.

Born to Marathi-speaking parents, D’Britto’s work named ‘Subodh Bible’ has recently been re-printed for the third time, and has sold out.

“I feel very happy about it because I feel this is recognition of Indian secularism, which respects all religions, and gives them equal respect,” the priest told DNA newspaper after hearing about the news.

He said the award to his work on the Bible shows that the “government stands by the secular ideals of the Indian constitution. I am happy that I could make some contribution to Marathi literature by getting the Holy Bible to the Marathi reader,” he said.

The priest is the second person- the first was British-born 17th-century missionary priest Fr Thomas Stevens- to have translated the Bible into Marathi.

“His work was in poetry form, while mine is in prose. It has 1,800 footnotes to explain various concepts of the Bible for people to understand,” said D’Britto.

Father Britto had in 2013 won the state’s literary award for best translation. In April 2014, he was honored with the Sahitya Akademi Award.

D’Britto started his work in translation in 1997 and completed it in 2010. The translation work was his effort alone.

Nun veil row sparks religious rights debate

Thiruvanthapuram: Denying a Catholic nun entry to an examination hall because she was wearing her habit calls for a discussion on the right to practice religion in a secular nation, says the head of the Catholic Church in India.

The Church does not wish to “rake up a controversy over this unfortunate incident,” says Cardinal Baselios Cleemis, president of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India.

However, it raises the question of whether authorities are “targeting religious symbols or exam malpractices”, he said.

The cardinal was responding after Sister Seba, 29, from the Congregation of the Sisters of the Imitation of Christ, was not allowed to take the Indian Pre-medical Entrance Test on July 23 because she was wearing a veil and cross that are part of her habit.

The national test, a qualifying examination for medical studies, was being staged again because of mass cheating the first time. The Indian Supreme Court had ordered a re-test and insisted on a strict dress code after students used sophisticated electronic devices to cheat.

Authorities at the examination center in the Kerala state capital of Thiruvananthapuram told the nun that she would not be allowed in with her veil and cross because of the court ruling. They also told her she could not take the test in a separate room, Sister Seba told ucanews.com.

“I refused to remove my veil and cross as it’s part of my dress code as a nun. I consulted with my superiors and they also supported my decision. So I lost an opportunity to take the test,” she said.

The veil “cannot be removed just like a hat. It has a lot of meaning, which others may not understand,” she added.

Cardinal Cleemis said such an issue was “not only to be discussed by priests and religious and the Catholic Church” but should become a matter of discussion for wider civil society to discuss the rights of people to practice their faith in a multi-religious nation, he said in a statement.

That discussion was taken up on social media. Some criticized the nun for stirring controversy.

If thousands of Muslims, Sikhs and those from other religious were not able to follow the dress code as prescribed by the examination board, why should a nun want “special treatment?” asked Jimmy Thomas, a Christian, on Facebook. However, Davis Mathew, also on Facebook, pointed out that some silent protests were “more meaningful. We support Sister Seba,” he said.

Some 600,000 students took the three hour-long-exam in centers across the nation.

Satya Das, principal of Jawahar Central Sschool, where the nun was to take the exam, said they would have allowed her to take the exam if she had handed her veil and cross to another nun who was with her. The nun refused to cooperate, Das said.

“I could not allow her in as it was against the guidelines given to us,” said Das, who is also a Christian.

Like this:

Caring for the poor and the environment are key to pontiff’s reforms, Vatican prefect says.

Pattaya: Catholics can take part in Pope Francis’ reforms by living an authentic life, paying special attention to the poor, caring for the environment and by learning from other religions, a Vatican official said.

“The pope is asking us today for a witness of credibility,” Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz, prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, told ucanews.com during an Asia-wide symposium on consecrated life and new evangelization held in Pattaya, Thailand, July 20-25.

“We are not saying that we are not sinners because the pope reminds us that whoever thinks that he is not a sinner is not a man or woman,” said Cardinal de Aviz. “God loves the sinner but God doesn’t love the one that is full of corruption,” Cardinal de Aviz said.

“This need for authenticity is very important for places here in Asia where there is co-existence of various religious experiences. And whatever is beautiful, good and true in any religion belongs also to us Christians, but this doesn’t allow us to not witness to Jesus Christ,” he said.

“I think it is also important to have an attitude of openness to all the cultural values of the local people. In a special way, an openness to all the sufferings of poverty, persecutions, instability, migration and so on,” he said.

“And if this existence together can lead us to a common culture for peace and justice then it is a very good thing,” he added.

The cardinal is considered a close confidant of the pope and shares in a common preferential option for the poor. Both are former archbishops of South American capitals — the pope in Buenos Aires and the cardinal in Brasilia. “The pope is a simple person, a transparent person,” Cardinal de Aviz said.

Since his election in 2013, Pope Francis has set about reforming the Catholic Church and its bureaucracy, which has won him global praise for his fresh and open style. Cardinal de Aviz calls this “a special moment in the Church.”

Speaking about Pope Francis’ new encyclical on the environment, Laudato si’, which was addressed to every person on the planet, the cardinal pointed to the importance of the letter. “We as Christians have a very positive vision and understanding of creation,” he said.

“The relationship we build with nature must be a relation based on love and respect because it is a good that belongs to all and so it is part of our faith,” he said, adding that “the pope has given us a strong input with this encyclical” and that “whoever is against the survival of creation is against the survival of humankind even if they can justify themselves with complicated things.”

The pope in his encyclical blamed human greed for the planet’s critical environmental emergency.

The Vatican rooms are impressive. As opposed to what happens in television studios, which in reality are smaller than they appear on the screen, here everything is larger: Saint Anne’s Door, the Apostolic Palace, the majestic stairway, Saint Damasus Courtyard. Historic magniloquence: some of its parts in fact are older than 500 years – splendid, but as opposed to what some continue to say, not ostentatious. In fact, I would say the opposite.

Archbishop Georg Gänswein received us in one of those rooms: not very large, red, luminous, ancient and elegant. One does not find in Archbishop Gänswein that haughtiness that one could expect from someone in his position, so close to two of the most influential persons in the world. He began to work with Cardinal Ratzinger in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1996, becoming his personal Secretary in 2003, a position that he kept at the election of the Cardinal to the Papal Seat. In 2012, he was appointed Prefect of the Papal Household and, with the new Pontificate, Francis confirmed him in that post. It was the year 2013, in fact in the month in which the intense heat paralyzed Rome, but not Pope Francis! It was August 31. Hence, Archbishop Gänswein is, to date, the only person in the history of the Church that serves two Popes contemporaneously. He lives with the German Pope: he concelebrates with him in the morning, they pray the Rosary together, and walk together for about a half hour in the Vatican Gardens. In the afternoon, instead, he works with the Argentine Pope.

* * *

Q: How do you manage to collaborate with two Popes? It doesn’t seem easy to adapt oneself to two such different personalities …

Archbishop Gänswein: They are certainly very different between them: and for me, after a long experience as Secretary of Cardinal Ratzinger, later Benedict XVI, to begin to work also with Pope Francis was not easy. Let’s say that, using media language, I had to “render myself compatible,” because it was quite an intense change. I had already received the office of Prefect, which Francis wished to reconfirm. What my collaborators and I do is to serve. And that is all. How is this done?

It depends much on the way the Pope guides the Church. However, I must say that there is a great advantage in all this: to live and work with two Popes, and to experience this diversity, has helped me and helps me to grow humanly and spiritually.

Q: Beyond the physical differences – the shoes, the cross, etc., it seems sometimes that there is a distance between the two also in what they say …

Archbishop Gänswein: All the stories that we heard at the beginning of the Pontificate as, for instance, that he uses black shoes, or that the material of his pectoral cross is less than silver, are secondary: they are exterior things, ways of doing things. If one looks more closely at the contents, it will be seen that in exercising the munus petrinum there is continuity with Benedict XVI. And this is right. We are talking of a South American and a German, of two very different personalities. The first is educated and formed by the Jesuit spirituality, and it is logical that his way of thinking, of doing and also of exercising the Petrine service is different from one who had first of all an academic-university formation.

Q: Francis often reminds me of John Paul II …

Archbishop Gänswein:: Yes, he can be so, even if they arrived at the See of Peter with twenty years of difference. Both had already accumulated enormous pastoral experience, although in a very different political and cultural context. Pope Francis, after having directed a large and not easy diocese such as that of Buenos Aires; Saint John Paul II at the head of the Church of Krakow that, at the time, was the only place where one could express oneself freely. I think we can compare them in this respect, but also in some aspects of their personality.

Q: Which?

Archbishop Gänswein:: Francis, for instance, talks a lot about the “culture of encounter”: to meet persons, and to meet them as much as possible. John Paul II didn’t speak expressly of this culture, but he put it constantly into practice. It is contact with others, including physical contact, which is striking in the two Popes.

Q: Sometimes I’ve heard it said: “John Paul II is the Pope of Hope; Benedict XVI the Pope of Faith; Francis the Pope of Charity.” Although simple, do you think it’s a good analysis of the reality?

Archbishop Gänswein:: It’s difficult to summarize an entire Pontificate in a word. Every time one attempts to enclose something complex in a word one runs a risk. I would say that Pope Francis is the Pope of gestures, the Pope of Mercy. We are still on the way; in any case, after two years, I think that to describe him as “the Pope of gestures” will at least help to give an idea.

Q: Two years after his renunciation, what was Benedict referring to when speaking of his “earthly pilgrimage”?

Archbishop Gänswein:: In his last brief address at Castel Gandolfo, Benedict XVI spoke of the “last stage of the earthly pilgrimage.” And before he had said that he would not come down from the cross, that he would not leave the Lord. He goes up to the mountain to pray for the Church and for his Successor. His role now is spiritual: to pray for Peter’s barque. It’s important to remember that the Church is not governed only with decisions and strategies, but also and above all with prayer. The Church is a “team of prayer,” and we know well that, the more people pray the better it is. In this team the Pope Emeritus has a particular place of “pilgrim.”

Q: Some do not yet understand the renunciation and interpret it as a strategy to block some attempts to cause “great damages” …

Archbishop Gänswein:: We could write a whole book of hypotheses and theories in this regard! On that February 11, Pope Benedict XVI read a brief and very clear statement explaining his reason. All the rest that has been said and hypothesized is altogether devoid of foundation. That there were individual persons, or even currents against Benedict, was irrelevant in regard to the renunciation. It’s obvious that a person like him had reflected long on a question of such importance. He didn’t allow himself to be intimidated by anyone. He was very clear in his conversation with Peter Seewald, several years before the renunciation: “When there are wolves, when there is danger, the shepherd must not leave his flock.” He didn’t do so then, and he has never done so; his was not a flight. This is the truth and it is the only explanation of the reason for his renunciation.

Q: On some occasions you have spoken of the “fruits” of this renunciation. What are these fruits?

Archbishop Gänswein:: Pope Benedict realized that to guide today’s Church it’s necessary to have spiritual strength but also physical strength. It was an act of very great humility to renounce the Papacy to make way for someone younger and stronger. I believe it’s a great example of love for the Lord and for the Church, an example that not all can or want to understand. Observing Pope Francis’ Pontificate, one can perceive how the image of the Church has changed for the better. Pope Benedict took the first step for the change: he opened the door to follow this path. I believe it could happen also in the future.

Q: You will admit, nevertheless, that for you those days in February 2013 were not precisely tranquil: who knows what conflicting sentiments you might have gone through …

Archbishop Gänswein:: Undoubtedly. They were very difficult days for me, but the distress began in reality many months before, the moment the Pope told me what he wished to do. Of course, I had to remain silent, as you can well imagine; that requited a great effort. That famous February 11 and then, the 28th, I was pierced by sentiments of gratitude, but also of sadness, and by something comparable to a sort of mourning. However, the Holy Father had made his decision, a decision of conscience, coram Deo, and therefore to be respected and followed.

Q: In your opinion, why did Joseph Ratzinger choose you as Secretary?

Archbishop Gänswein: What a question! He was 75 years old and was convinced that John Paul II would accept his resignation. I was already working at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and his Secretary at the time had just received a new post in the Congregation for Consecrated Life. The Cardinal was in need of someone who would function as his secretary and he chose me. He never explained to me why he chose me, and I never asked him. I was surprised, of course, but he took this decision and I accepted.

Q: I believe that the surprise to see that your Cardinal was becoming Pope was enormous …

Archbishop Gänswein: Yes, naturally. I would never have imagined it, and I believe the Cardinal did even less so. He was elected. He wanted to retire, but the future was altogether different! He accepted the election of Pope because he saw God’s will in it. And I became Secretary of a Pope. Those days were also like a tsunami for me, as you can imagine.

Q: With the advent of the new Pope did you ever think that you would probably leave the post of Prefect of the Papal Household, and that your life would then be somewhat more “tranquil”?

Archbishop Gänswein: No. Not because I was sure that I would be confirmed, but because all that didn’t worry me. Therefore, I didn’t think about it much and I was not afraid at the moment of the change. It’s normal that, when the Pope wishes, when he believes it’s opportune, he changes the team. In 2013 he decided to have me stay on in the post and I’m here. Now I think only of serving in the best way possible.

Q: In your opinion, and recalling that for Pope Benedict the fight against relativism was very important, what do you think is the dearest subject for the present Pope?

Archbishop Gänswein: The question of truth always remains important and I believe that Francis thinks about it the same way. It’s not that he’s not interested in the fight against relativism, but he sees clearly that, in his Pontificate, God is asking him to concentrate on other points, on other challenges. He has very much at heart to speak of a “poor, missionary Church.” He likes the concept of the Church as “field hospital” or “outgoing Church.” It is in these areas that Pope Francis is fighting at present.

Q: The family is one of the challenges. Why do you think so much confused news has been circulating on the last Synod and on the one that will be held in the next month of October?

Archbishop Gänswein: There are persons who have written or write without being well informed or well prepared and, in addition, there are “currents.” Therefore, it’s very important that the Pastors of the Church and also the faithful have the ideas and content clearly and express them frankly and sincerely. The October Synod must begin not from a particular problem, but from the main topic and that is, from “the evangelization of the family.” Clearly the Church doesn’t close her eyes in face of the difficulties of faithful living in difficult situations. However, the Church must give sincere answers that are oriented, not to the spirit of the times, but to the Gospel, to the Word of Jesus Christ and to the Catholic Tradition.

Q: What are the present challenges in this field?

Archbishop Gänswein: A challenge is certainly Christians that are in a marital situation theologically called “irregular.” It means persons who have divorced and remarried civilly. We must help them, certainly, but not in a reductive way. It’s important to get close to them, to create contact and maintain it because they are members of the Church as everyone else, they are not expelled and even less so excommunicated. They are supported, but there are problems in regard to the sacramental life. The Church must also be very sincere with faithful living in this situation. It’s not only about saying: “They can, they can’t.” And there, in my opinion, it must be addressed positively. The question of access to the sacramental life must be addressed sincerely on the basis of Catholic teaching. I hope that in the months of preparation before the Synod proposals will be presented that help and serve to find the just answers to such weighty challenges.

Q: Some of these disputes come from your native land, Germany. Why?

Archbishop Gänswein: Yes. It’s true that not all the errors come from there, but on the point in question certainly yes: twenty years ago, after a long and laborious negotiation, John Paul II didn’t accept that remarried Christians could accede to the Eucharist. Now, we can’t ignore his teaching and change things. Why do some pastors want to propose what’s not possible? I don’t know. Perhaps they give in to the spirit of the time; perhaps they allow themselves to be guided by the human applause caused by the media … To be critical against the mass media is certainly less pleasing, but a pastor must not decide on the basis of applause or even less of the media. The measure is the Gospel, the faith, healthy doctrine, Tradition.

Q: Why do you think the media you just mentioned say little or nothing about persecuted Christians? Is the Pope alone on this?

Archbishop Gänswein:The Pope is very clear on this point and, unfortunately, great institutions are silent or, if they speak, do so in an inconsistent way. And this is very grave. It’s unacceptable behavior. Up to now the Pope is the only convincing and courageous voice that says things as they are. He’s not afraid and does not seek people’s applause. He acts like Saint Paul, namely, he intervenes opportunely and importunely in a clear way

Q: The Pope’s day is intense, and I conclude that yours is also: you don’t have time to play tennis, as you certainly would like, or to dedicate yourself to university activity. Would you perhaps have desired another life?

Archbishop Gänswein: I’ve never asked myself this question, because I’ve never said “ I want to do this, or that …” When a post has come to me, I’ve accepted it. Pope Benedict asked me something, and so I accepted it and did it gladly. The same is true for Pope Francis.

Q: Reviewing your history beginning from those days of your youth – in which you had long hair (laughs) – up to today, what would Georg Gänswein: say of his life?

Archbishop Gänswein: When I look back from this perspective I laugh a bit about all this … I was 18, 19 and at that time – end of high school and beginning of the Seminary – it was fashionable: I wasn’t the only one! My father didn’t like it and that caused moments of tension. However, personally a principle of life has always been useful to me: ”trust, but be careful of whom.” And also another, which in German says: Tue recht und scheue niemanden.. That is, “do everything you consider just and don’t be afraid of anyone.”

He was speaking at a function to release a book on the life and work of former RSS chief K.C. Sudarshan.

New Delhi:Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) patron Ashok Singhal on Saturday said India will become a Hindu nation by 2020 and the entire world would be Hindu by 2030.Singhal was speaking at a function here to release a book on the life and work of former RSS chief K.C. Sudarshan.

Singhal said: “Sudarshan ji, a great visionary, once told me that the entire country will be Hindu by 2020 and the entire world will be Hindu by 2030.”

“Sudarshan ji was not only a saint but a visionary, who had predicted that a revolutionary change in the country will begin in 2012 and ultimately that happened in 2014,” he said in an oblique reference to the BJP-led alliance’s victory in the 2014 Lok Sabha polls.

Sushma Swaraj said: “Sudarshan ji was like my mother. As girls used to share everything with their mother, I used to share with him everything.”
IANS