To paraphrase the new dear leader, "Our community is majority immigrant. We have significant problems with domestic abuse and human trafficking, and a population with debilitating, yet self-imposed, health concerns that they can't pay for, so we're gonna have to make it more affordable (somehow....I wonder how)."

And America wants MORE of these people? Are these her anti-immigration talking points? Pretty good, if you ask me.

Sounds like ICE missed a golden opportunity to round up some illegals.

(08-11-2018 02:15 AM)Castelnau Wrote: I feel like the right is falling into the same trap the left did with Trump. Yeah she's obviously dumb so we get obsessed with "owning" her by getting her into a debate at which point we'll totally "destroy" her and expose to the world how dumb she is while getting a good laugh. The left felt the same way about Trump and even Palin.

It never happens that way.

Stop giving her attention, stop hate-watching her at this rate she's going to be President.

No she does not deserve attention nor anything else.
Yet she is so, so easy to mock...

However, as I've said before, unlike Trump, she has nothing to offer in terms of any substance nor accomplishments.
She has no life experience.
She is making all these gaffs cause she is simply a little girl way out of her league, pushed out by the Cabal despite her lack of anything tangible.

Trump is a father first & foremost.
He's a highly experienced businessman.
He's been in the game of New York & D.C. politics & economics for decades.
He knows the game, he knows the score.

Hell, even when he goofs around, as for eg. when he mocks the whole 'acting presidential' thing. It's entertaining.

Whereas AOC is simply a goof period. Who has no idea what she is doing, despite being given the limelight on a silver platter.

Well, true but on the left the most valued assets a candidate can have are elevated melanin levels and a vagina (bonus points for surgically implanted). Obama was a community organizer who served one term in state senate and one term in US senate, before winning the presidency. And he didn't even have a vag. Who needs economic theory when you have a brown girl with a PhD in victimology? And she makes a mean margarita salted with white girl tears?? Daaaayum

(08-18-2018 05:55 PM)Gorgiass Wrote: Well, true but on the left the most valued assets a candidate can have are elevated melanin levels and a vagina (bonus points for surgically implanted). Obama was a community organizer who served one term in state senate and one term in US senate, before winning the presidency. And he didn't even have a vag. Who needs economic theory when you have a brown girl with a PhD in victimology? And she makes a mean margarita salted with white girl tears?? Daaaayum

Barack was fortunate.
He came in after 8 years of a disliked POTUS who wasn't really all that popular even with R's at that point.
There was enough of an anti-war sentiment to go after the non Neo-Con candidate.
The R's did not have a charismatic nor meaningful candidate to oppose Barack.
Plus, the (pun intended) half-arsed notion that he is black as opposed to being a half-caste, was propagated rather well.
Thus allowing him to check the box of first black POTUS.
He also came along before social media was as pervasive as it is now.

AOC in years to come, may tick the box of first female POTUS if she ever runs for POTUS, yet that may not be the case by that time.
Also at this rate, she won't be swanning in as a highly charming nor even mildly inspiring candidate.
Everyone, even leftist media folk due to this town-hall gaffe, can see she is an absolute git.
She's not going to be this elusive, mysterious candidate when / if running for POTUS. She'll be well known as a goofy git, cause of social media's mass presence today.
Plus all the while, unless she raises her hand at a time when there is a distinct social / political shift towards socialism. The public at large won't vote for her as a majority.

All the while, Trump is accomplished, charismatic & inspiring enough.
To the point where his well known background was not a notable enough factor to hinder his efforts.
He came in using social media to his full benefit & came in during a time of a social / political shift against political correctness & a time when folk wanted a change after 8 years of Barack.

If the D's do not make any gains in November & there is not a great deal pointing to them doing so.
Over the next 6 years. AOC will simply be akin to a small whiny, papping dog.
All bark, no bite & all the while crapping on the carpet to everyone's annoyance.

^
Either 'they' quickly realized how much of a dud she is & now they're leaving her out to flounder on her own.
Or this was a means of the establishment D's to once again screw over now "independent" Bernie Sanders...

Quote:Congratulations, @AndrewGillum! The progressive movement is transforming the country - and he proved that again tonight. Gillum ran on Medicare for All, Legalizing Marijuana, #AbolishICE & more. Thank you, Florida voters! On to November

AOC promotes the idea to abolish ICE.

Yet if that came to be.
Who would protect #America & specifically Florida, from all the ebola laden monkey's that could be smuggled in...?

(09-02-2018 03:12 AM)budoslavic Wrote: For years, Liberals successfully infected young people's minds in education environments. Now AOC and her Socialist goons are brainwashing children with this crap.

Does not seem as if she needed to do much indoctrinating. The black and Mestizo kids were all ready to "fight Trump" and to "take out Trump". Obviously 11-year-olds are quite knowledgeable about current affairs. Anyone who is white at this point in our time is automatically racist - unless he is a sniveling self-hating Trudeau-like moron.

The Democrats are just going to lose at least in this midterms and in 2020 (2 more election cycles). AOC isn't the chosen one or at best she'll have a better message beyond 2020. She's just getting her name out there. I'm just calling it like I see it and even if I were to propose some ideas I think by then Trump will have America firing on all cylinders. At worst, why would I want to help the Democrat party for free? They haven't done anything for me. I personally am not happy at where I'm at right now but I'm working hard every day to improve. I didn't beg the Democrat party (under Obama) for help. I just worked my ass off and had to deal with mental breakdowns and burnouts.

The party's in disarray; alt left populism versus status quo corporatism. Just talking to my coworkers they might (EMPHASIS) not like Trump but that's all the Democrats got. Some of us are working hard and getting left in the cold.

(09-21-2018 09:31 AM)kosko Wrote: For the folks who stay ignorant and hating and not improving their situation during these Trump years, it will be bleak and cold once the good times stop.

The Democrats are going to lose now, but then either in 6 years likely never lose again in national elections. And state elections once turned will look like California. It's demographics that will push the US into forever Democrat territory - it will be like the ANC in South Africa - at best to be replaced with even greater communist radicals, but certainly no libertarian leaning ones.

(09-02-2018 09:35 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote: The Democrats are going to lose now, but then either in 6 years likely never lose again in national elections. And state elections once turned will look like California. It's demographics that will push the US into forever Democrat territory - it will be like the ANC in South Africa - at best to be replaced with even greater communist radicals, but certainly no libertarian leaning ones.

How long will it be till that fermenting "Democratic" super-majority decides to appropriate parts of California, and Texas back to Mexico. 50 years? 100 years?

Doesn't matter if she does not have the support of the oligarchs now. Someone like that will have enough support bottom-up. And funny how she claims that the Democrat Party is not big money. It's the biggest money out there.

And the Democrat party in the 1940s was aligned with the KKK.

Plus - according to the immigration policies of the 1940s she would not have been able to enter the US. There was a reason for this greatness, this push towards the moon - it wasn't Mexican grasscutters and the diversity industry.

< She not that dumb, she is smart enough to understand the propaganda, but not smart enough to see through it.

In a sane country she would be married, pushing the stroller of her 3rd kid around and happy as can be going to coffee-brunches with the other moms, using her powers of talk for female gossip. She is bangable enough and likely sexually charged, so the guy in a sane country who marries her ass at age 18 will be fine.

It's just insane to push those women into gulag indoctrination centers and then give them real power.

The Washington Post does a nice little promo with happy music for democratic socialism. It's missing the spliced shots of blood dripping into water and Adolph Hitler they have on hand for covering anything in the proximity of Trump.