The Media Project is a network of mainstream journalists who are Christians pursuing accurate and intellectually honest reporting on all aspects of culture, particularly the role of religion in public life in all corners of the world. It welcomes friends from other faiths to such discussions and training.

Dec 9

Dec 9 Dispensationalist alert: Only several billion trees to go

Blaine Harden of The Washington Post writes with sympathy for evangelicals who care about the environment — or “creation care,” as one pastor says he calls it because of evangelicals’ purported hang-ups about the word environmentalism.

But there’s one big cowpie in those pastoral fields:

Even for green activists within the evangelical
movement, there are landmines. One faction in the movement, called
dispensationalism, argues that the return of Jesus and the end of the
world are near, so it is pointless to fret about environmental
degradation.

James G. Watt, President Ronald Reagan’s first interior secretary,
famously made this argument before Congress in 1981, saying: “God gave
us these things to use. After the last tree is felled, Christ will come
back.”

Something about that example rang false, and it wasn’t just the idea
that even a dispensationalist envisions a day “after the last tree is
felled.” Blogger David Kopel began taking apart this urban legend last week. The remark comes from three primary sources:

• Bill Moyers, in one of his recent screeds against the religious right.

• Glenn Scherer of Grist magazine, whom Moyers cited as his source. (Scherer has appended a correction to the end of his article, “The Godly Must Be Crazy.”)

John “Hindrocket” Hinderaker of Powerline interviewed Watt by phone and performed more fisking, including this excerpt from Watt’s actual testimony in 1981:

Mr. Weaver [D. Ore.]: Do you want to see on lands under your management, the sustained yield policies continued?

Secretary Watt: Absolutely.

Mr. Weaver: I am very pleased to hear that. Then I will make one
final statement … I believe very strongly that we should not, for
example, use up all the oil that took nature a billion years to make in
one century.

We ought to leave a few drops of it for our children, their
children. They are going to need it … I wonder if you agree, also, in
the general statement that we should leave some of our resources — I am
now talking about scenic areas or preservation, but scenic resources
for our children? Not just gobble them up all at once?

Secretary Watt: Absolutely. That is the delicate balance the
Secretary of the Interior must have, to be steward for the natural
resources for this generation as well as future generations.

I do not know how many future generations we can count on before the
Lord returns, whatever it is we have to manage with a skill to leave
the resources needed for future generations.

Hinderaker says he has written to the Post to request a correction. One can always hope.