Soon the NRA will get their wish, people will be so afraid to send their children to school that they will support every teacher and school worker being strapped to the teeth.

Of course such a strategy would not work, but it would fit into their agenda of guns, guns, and more guns.

"As you can imagine, the best description is chaos," Robinson said. "It's too early to say whether he was targeting people or going on an indiscriminate shooting spree."

Does it even matter?

I am glad O acknowledged that his website for Obamacare isn't working like it should. He tried to spin it, but the fact that he held a presser to talk about it tells you all you need to know.

"Of course, you've probably heard that healthcare.gov, the new website where people can apply for health insurance and browse and buy affordable plans in most states, hasn't worked as smoothly as it was supposed to work, and the number of people who've visited the site has been overwhelming, which has aggravated some of these underlying problems."

Gee, ya think?

Now, of course, his opponents see an opening. I think every FOX television host and wingnut radio host has called the website to prove what a mess it is. And some folks in the media are in a state of hysteria about the rollout and they have declared that it will put Obamacare into a "death spiral". We will see.

My advice to real people who might need healthcare is this: Chill. You waited years for universal health care; you can wait a little longer for a bunch of tech geeks to get this website fixed.

"But Field, it's the government; nothing the government does ever works"
I know, we get those social security checks every month courtesy of Wall Street.

The battle between Obama and the Republicans is a sad and pitiful contest for the same reason that a baseball game in which one side plays by the rules and the other one races the bases in motorcycles and shoots the balls over the fence with an RPG.

Ted Cruz has come the closest to understanding that the other side just doesn't play by any rules, but lacks the leverage to make much of that. Cruz is still a product of a system in which there are rules. And that system is as unfit for challenging the left-wing radicals running things as trying to play a game of chess against an opponent who feels like moving the pieces any which way he feels like and always claims to have won.

Law is a consensus. If you stop keeping the law, the police arrest you. If a gang of left-wing radicals in a basement somewhere stopped following the law, they might be locked up. It's not a certain thing considering that mad bomber Bill Ayers is a university professor. But once those same left-wing radicals control much of the system and the media that reports on the system, they have no reason to follow the law.

Political factions agree to follow the law for mutual benefit. The Constitution had to be agreed upon by just about everyone. The left-wing radicals in Rhode Island who were making everyone pledge allegiance to their worthless paper currency while threatening to nationalize everything refused and had to be forced in with threats of military intervention and trade embargoes.

But in the end they got the last laugh.

The United States has never really had full-bore left-wing radicals running it before. It does now.

Media outlets breathlessly report on Tea Party radicalism, which consists of wanting to undo the judicial activism of the last century. Meanwhile Obama and his cronies just ignore any law they don't like and rule by fiat.

Which of these is more radical? The Tea Party activists who would like to revisit the debate over the Tenth Amendment or an administration that does anything it pleases and challenges an impotent judiciary and an even more impotent legislature to stand in its way?

The Tea Party activists would like to revise American legal history. Their left-wing opponents sweep the whole thing off the table. The Tea Party would like the system to abide by the letter of its legal covenants while their left-wing opponents have "modernized" them by judicial fiat and disregarded them by executive fiat.

The only laws that Obama will follow are those that allow him to do what he wants to do anyway. Like the Caliph who conquered Egypt and declared that if the Library of Alexandria should be burned because if its books contradicted the Koran they were heretical and if they agreed with it they were blasphemous, the entire American system, its laws and regulations, are at best supplementary.

Law is a consensus. But the left rejects that consensus. It subjects each law to an ideological test. If the law meets the ideological test, which is based on social justice criteria entirely foreign to the American legal system, and the practical test of furthering social justice, it can stay. If not, then it will either be struck down or disregarded. They have applied that same ideological test to the nation as a whole and decided that the existence of the United States does not meet their ideological tests.

Political factions in the past may have engaged in bare-knuckle political hostilities but they all agreed that the United States in its past, present and future forms was the proper arena for their disputes and that the maintenance of an objective system of laws was the best way to ensure its perpetuation. When that consensus broke down, a civil war resulted. Now the consensus is in even worse tatters.

It's not the Tea Party that is the new Confederacy, as popular a media talking point as that may be. The new threat isn't secessionist, but supersessionist. The new Confederacy isn't out to break up the Union into territorial slices, but to replace the Union with a new and different Union. Call it the Confederacy of the Community Organizers, the War between the Unions or the Supersession War.

The Supersessionist rebels insist that the Constitution and the old order were superseded a long time ago by the march of history. And the only reason that we don't call them rebels is because they are in control of almost the entire system of government.

Can a government be considered in rebellion against a nation's laws and its established order? That is the bizarre situation we find ourselves in. There is no shot fired at Fort Sumter. Instead a million conspirators tear apart and remake the system in countless ways on a daily basis while the leadership remains in open rebellion of the laws that it is obligated to abide by and enforce.

Obama and the Republicans are fighting a civil war which only the Supersessionists of the Liberal Confederacy fully understand.

The Republicans, who for the most part are about as radical as a three-piece suit, are fighting to maintain a consensus in which everyone follows the law and settles their disagreements by hammering out a compromise that keeps the system going. And their opponents disregard the consensus and the system and go on doing what they want while defying anyone to stop them.

You could call it political civil disobedience, the left would certainly like to when dealing with the administration's radical lawbreaking on immigration or gay marriage, but civil disobedience applies to the civil population, not to their government. Government disobedience isn't noble or virtuous. The rebellion of governments against the laws they are obligated to enforce is self-righteous tyranny.

A government in rebellion against the laws is one that asserts that no power, not that of tradition, of the legal covenants that brought the system into being or even the previous votes of the people, is superior to it. That is why the rebellion of the supersessionists is far worse than the rebellions of secessionists. Both the secessionists and the supersessionists reject the consensus, but only the supersessionists insist on forcing a new system of their own making in place of the old consensus.

The unequal constest places liberal rebels looking to trash the system from the top against conservative defenders of an old order fighting from the bottom. The old Nixon vs. Hippies match-up has been flipped over. Nixon is in the crowd of protesters against government abuse and the hippies are laughing at him from the White House. The counterculture has become the culture, but still acts like it's the counterculture even when it's running everything.

On one side there is no consensus and no law; only sheer will. On the other there is a body of legal traditions going back centuries.

It's painfully clear that two such approaches cannot coexist within a single government. And those who have the power and follow no rules have the supreme advantage of wielding government power without the legal restrictions that were meant to bind the abuse of that power.

The Republicans are struggling to find common ground over a mutual respect for the system where none exists. Like any totalitarian radicals, their opponents regard their concern for legalism with contempt.

The radical does not respect process, only outcome. He holds law in contempt, but respects will. While the Republicans debate process, the Democrats steamroll them by focusing only on outcome. Where there is no consensus, then process does not matter. The Democrats treat process as a fiction when it comes to ObamaCare or immigration. And the Republicans struggle to understand why no one holds them accountable without understanding that accountability is also an aspect of process.

The radicalization of the Democratic Party is slowly leading to a counterpart radicalism in the Republican Party. The process is moving far slower because of the vested interests in the way, but every time the radicals of the left displays their contempt for the consensus, they are paving the way for the rise of a Republican Party whose members are more like Ted Cruz than John McCain.

What radicals never understand is that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The process of the consensus exists to safeguard both sides and prevent political battles from spinning out of control. Democrats, under the influence of the radical left, have decided that they can unilaterally transform the country by acting as if the consensus and the process don't bind them. They have not considered what will happen when a Republican Party that has as much resemblance to its present day leaders as Barack Obama does to Hubert Humphrey makes that same decision.

Liberal supersessionists claim to be worried about conservative secessionists when they should be far more worried about conservative supersessionists. The consensus we all live by is a fragile thing. It is being torn apart by the radical left and once it is destroyed, it will not bind the right, in the same way that it no longer binds the left.

"But Field, it's the government; nothing the government does ever works"

I know, we get those social security checks every month courtesy of Wall Street._______________-Field, you are definitely an Obamaholic. The man must be God in your eyes.

This ACA, better known as Obamacare doesn't look good AT ALL. It appears to be the biggest nightmare ever. It is a hurricane forming into a category never seen before.

And here you are, once again, staying true blue to the greatest disaster ever! Hell, even Bill Clinton has gone into hiding on this one.

But this is just what the Repubs need to hold the House and to take the WH. They can confidently say, "See, I told you so."

For the life of me, I don't understand the Dems. Here was a golden opportunity to lock up the House, Senate and WH. And what do they do? They make a bigger screw up than the Repubs! This is exactly what they did when they had the House, Senate and WH. They found a way to become useless.

I really think the Dems and Repubs are cohorts in this mess. When one starts to lose badly the other screws up badly so the other can look better. Neither gives a damn about the American people. Otherwise, the people would have seen it by now.

Re: Social Security: The Dems are ready to give it away. Haven't you noticed the warnings? Maybe not. You still think the only thing wrong with Obamacare is its website! smh

from last thread...i forgot to tell you that the wicked powers that be are OBSESSED with the book of Revelation. what goes down will look like Scriptures. so much so, the elect could be fooled. how much more so those too wise in their own eyes to take a peek.

folks will read, believe, quote, link everything else.

fairy tales contain made up people, places and things. the wizard of oz is a mind control programming fairy tale.

'a DOJ lawyer had them sign a confidentiality agreement. Then they showed them a video of Michael Hastings car blowing up. Then Obama came in and gave them one of these threatening 'pep talks' like the one above. Then they sent back in the DOJ lawyer surrounded by mean looking cops to talk about imprisonment of journalist for 'bad journalism', then Obama shook hands with them while giving them an evil smile on the way out of the White House. The Godfather would be so jealous.'

"Soon the NRA will get their wish, people will be so afraid to send their children to school that they will support every teacher and school worker being strapped to the teeth."

Brother Field, I agree with you. We need our teachers, staff, and janitors armed and ready to prevent events like this.

Wayne LaPierre is right. In fact, he has been right on everything he has said. It's too bad people like you are so resistant to the inevitable.

Also, I am surprised that you, and some of your FN fans, esp Whitey, Granny, Purple Cow and PilotX didn't jump on this back in May 2013, when the President of the NRA said the following:

A "news article" making the rounds via social media quotes incoming NRA president Jim Porter as saying, "I don't have to clarify. You know gall darn well what I mean. In fact, it's only a matter of time before we can own colored people again. They sure as hell won't be our leaders."

I am really surprised that a big R chaser like you or that purple Negro in the UK did not even say a word. I wonder about you, BROTHER.

'The first half of the talk featured the display of incomprehensible "erudition" professors use to put their audiences into a respectful trance. Then Kincaid came out with his trademark message. He implied that everyone is sexually attracted to children and only pedophiles are honest enough to admit it.'

'This is the strategy homosexual activists also use. Anyone who doesn't want their "lifestyle" to become the societal norm is a closeted gay himself.'

expect more of this as chaos is unleashed. i suppose it would be too much to expect that women and children would be protected...as we are ushered into gender neutral unnatural land. those familiar understand.

brave souls must call it out with courage.

'the world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.' - Albert Einstein

_________________

the reference to Michael Hastings, pricked me a bit after i laughed at the wit of the commenter.

i want to be clear:

i have NOTHING but love and the utmost respect for Mr. Hastings, Aaron Schwartz and all other fallen soldiers in the battle of souls that is underway...

all those that have been assassinated on my watch, i pray that you know i AM inspired by your example to Stand Strong.

___________________

slavery provisions are already here:

Thirteenth Amendment-Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

those that don't believe, might want to take a peek at Scriptures...the enemy has to make his defeated run for the throne of Most High line up with Universal Law. those that don't know the Law...won't be ready.

When are we going to wake up to the ongoing violence in this country? It's Catch22 when you have lobbyists calling the shots (unintended pun). As for AHA, it's inexcusable to put up a site that doesn't work. They (the idiots in govt who green lighted the launch should have been more patient, waiting til they knew it would work under demand. Were they underestimating demand? How stupid.

10. ACA's scheme of privatized health insurance paid for by public dollars was originally devised by one arm of the ultraconservative Heritage Foundation, and is opposed today by another arm of that same organization.

9. Making health insurance and health care privatized commodities instead of human rights granted certain permanent rights to those profits under the currently popular conservative legal “takings” doctrine.

8. We have to wait till 2016, when the Obama administration is on its way out of office for all the provisions of the ACA to take effect.

7. ACA only covers about half the nation's total uninsured. It leaves two thirds of the blacks and single mothers, along with half the low-wage employed currently without health insurance untouched.

6. The ACA gives us little or no cost control over medical care and even bans most measures that would lower the cost of prescription drugs.

5. We gave an ongoing river of cash to private health insurance companies. Millions more are now forced to buy their crappy product, with the premiums funded by billion annually in public subsidies.

4. We got an initially unworkable internet front end for our chaotic and confusing “marketplace.”

3. We got a chaotic and confusing “marketplace” in which patients with little information are encouraged to conflate low insurance premiums with low-cost quality insurance.

2. We got a Medicare expansion which can be thwarted at will by current or future Republican controlled state governments.

1. We got a swiss cheese system that exempts many large corporations from having to ensure their employees.

and only hobama nazis will welcome this new robbery by that bankster hobama

shame!!!!!!!

Any nominally progressive feature of the legislation has been long since stripped away or abandoned. But the truth of the matter is that it was never about improving medical care for ordinary Americans, and it was always about setting up an even more heavily class-based system of health care delivery. From the beginning, Obama promised that his “reform” would slash hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicare, and costs would be further cut by eliminating “unnecessary” treatments and services.

People without coverage through their employer, or from a government program such as Medicare or Medicaid, are to make up the fresh pool of captive, cash-paying customers who must fend for themselves on the insurance exchanges. Beginning today, those browsing the offerings on the new “marketplace” will confront a confusing array of plans, but with one common feature: The least expensive plans offer the lowest levels of coverage with limited choices, and the highest out-of-pocket costs.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the health care overhaul will leave an estimated 31 million people—about a tenth of the US population—uninsured by 2023. Undocumented workers and their families are barred from purchasing coverage on the exchanges. Due to a “family glitch” in the law, businesses are only required to provide “affordable” insurance to their employees, not to their employees’ families, so those family members will not receive subsidies to purchase coverage on the exchanges.

The very poorest people will also be ineligible in some states. While the US Supreme Court ruled the ACA constitutional, it struck down a component of the law that called for expanding Medicaid. The result is that in 21 states, many people making below the poverty level will not be eligible for either ACA subsidies or Medicaid. Still others will be forced to go without coverage because they simply cannot afford it, with or without the government subsidies.

The health care overhaul is effecting a shift in the insurance market as a whole. Some companies and municipalities are already planning to end coverage for retirees and/or active workers, dumping them onto the exchanges. Still others are ending traditional employer coverage and offering workers a defined contribution to purchase coverage on private insurance “exchanges” set up by their employers, with limited choices and high out-of-pocket costs. One in four employers are reportedly considering moving their workers to a private exchange over the next three to five years.

What a pack of lies! Obamacare is a thoroughly counterrevolutionary measure, crafted in the interests of the type of elite, wealthy layers that populate the Times editorial staff.

The Obamacare catastrophe demonstrates the incompatibility of the private ownership of the means of production and the basic social rights of the working class, including health care, education, jobs, and a secure retirement. It points to the necessity of placing the entire health care industry—the insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, and the giant health care chains—on socialist foundations.

it is your blackish false god hobama's grabbing of more and more guns that should vex u...truly

ieif that teacher had a gunhe would be aliveperiod.

&

those who are paying attn and saneknow that hobama lied yet again in his fake presserjust as u do about measthat cia bankster hobama is just another fake nig too

hobamascare is a casino for pharma corpsthe irs is the new gestapowe are all doomed as employers' insurance becomes a relic like free speech and gun ownershipwe will all pay more for lesshobamscare is a real and HORRID failure

only adoring fools like u actually believe its abject failures can be erased by one more inept lie from that incessant liar hobamawtfu asap

and blind deaf dumb blacks like fajke nigwho have been robbed the MOST adore him most

what a gd shame!!!!!!!

Obamacare Is Another Private Sector Rip-Off Of Americans

Last February 3, I posted on this website a column, “Obamacare: A Deception,” written by an expert on the subject. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2013/02/03/obamacare-a-primer/Obamacare works for the insurance companies, but not for the uninsured. The cost of using Obamacare is prohibitive for those who most need the health coverage. The cost of the premiums net of the government subsidy is large. It amounts to a substantial pay cut for people struggling to pay their bills. In addition to the premium cost, it is prohibitive for hard pressed Americans to use the policies because of the deductibles and co-pays. For the very poor, who are thrown into Medicaid systems, any assets they might have, such as a home, are subject to confiscation to cover their Medicaid bills. The only people other than the insurance companies who benefit from Obamacare are the down and out who are devoid of all assets.

Obamacare has resulted in the health insurance companies, who thought that they would be living in high profits from the mandated health coverage, being outsmarted by employers, who have reduced their full-time workers to part-time in order to avoid Omamacare’s requirement to provide health coverage to those employees who work 30 hours a week or more.

Employers can get away with this, because jobs are hard to find. The lack of employment opportunities results in Americans with engineering degrees working as retail sales clerks and as shelf stockers in Walmart and Home Depot. Despite the abundance of unemployed and under-employed American technical and engineering workers, the large corporations lobby Congress for more H-1B visas to bring in lowly paid foreigners with the argument that there is a shortage of qualified Americans for technical work.

For millions of employees, Obamacare means cut hours and less take home pay plus out-of-pocket expenses to purchase an Obamacare health policy. For most people covered by Obamacare, this is a lose-lose situation.

It is also a lose-loss situation for the vast majority of the young. Most young people, unless they have jobs that provide health coverage, do without it, because the chances of the young having heart attacks, cancer, and other serious health problems is low.

Obamacare, however, requires the healthy young to pay premiums for coverage or to pay a penalty to the IRS.

Obamacare benefits only two classes of people. It benefits employers who drop their employees working hours below the hours specified for Obamacare coverage, and it benefits the insurance companies or the IRS who collect the premiums and penalties.Many of the people who pay the premiums won’t be able to use the policies because of co-pays and deductions.

The very poor with no assets might receive health care if they reside in states that accept the Medicaid provisions of Obamacare.

In 21st century America, the few people who have experienced income gains are the executives and shareholders of firms who offshored their production for US markets, Wall Street which makes bets covered by the Federal Reserve, and the military-security complex which has been enriched by the neoconservatives’ wars.

who have been robbed the MOST adore that lying inept bankster hobama most

shame!!!

that rabid bankster hobama and his horrid hobamascare have failed

ONLY hobama nazis fools deny both facts

shame!!!!

The failure of this new digital technocratic healthcare web portal actually has nothing to do with the quality of the website, but has everything to do with the quality of the product, and even more so whether or not it actually fills a need.Unlike the Washington Post, Forbes actually reported the truth: Obamacare’s website is crashing because it doesn’t want you to know how costly its plans are:

“A growing consensus of IT experts, outside and inside the government, have figured out a principal reason why the website for Obamacare’s federally-sponsored insurance exchange is crashing. Healthcare.gov forces you to create an account and enter detailed personal information before you can start shopping. This, in turn, creates a massive traffic bottleneck, as the government verifies your information and decides whether or not you’re eligible for subsidies. HHS bureaucrats knew this would make the website run more slowly. But they were more afraid that letting people see the underlying cost of Obamacare’s insurance plans would scare people away.”

More problems will arise as time passes with type of system. The devil will be in the detail. The reality will soon become evident that Obamacare lets whoever it classifies as “the poor” to walk right in to hospitals, while forcing working Americans to take out a bank loan in order to get inside a hospital – premiums will be twice as high, and already expensive deductibles will increase, not to mention that this new system may soon require that entire deductibles must be paid up front.

Contrary to the partisan rhetoric coming out of the White House and its Democratic Party arm, political and public opposition to Obamacare is a direct result of the federal government’s attempt to ram its program down Americans’ throats, and the IRS has been hire to collect healthcare fees – possibly at gun-point. If you know anything about the IRS, you’ll know that is no exaggeration.

Americans should not forget: the original Obamacare bill was passed through the House before anyone had actually read it.

"It leaves two thirds of the blacks and single mothers, along with half the low-wage employed currently without health insurance untouched."

Except it doesn't. Low income participants are covered by enhanced medicade. Well, at least in the states that implement it. True, states with repub governors will leave their most vulnerable out in the cold but that's what you get for electing right winged nut cases into the state house. That'll learn ya.

"South Dakota doctors are urging Gov. Dennis Daugaard (R) to expand Medicaid under Obamacare, warning that a failure to do so will hurt hospitals financially and raise health care costs for people with private insurance.

Current Medicaid eligibility thresholds in most states — including South Dakota — are so demanding that they disqualify even the poorest working adults from receiving coverage through the program. In South Dakota, 15 percent of the adult population lives at or below 100 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), which works out to be about $11,500 per year for an individual. But just eight percent of adults are covered by Medicaid.

Under Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion, any adult making up to 138 percent FPL would be able enroll in the public health insurance program. That would end up cutting South Dakota’s uninsurance rate by more than half. Without the expansion, on the other hand, South Dakota’s poorest will have to continue relying on the emergency room for their medical services."

From Think Progress. BiB, thank your right winged friends for driving up the cost of insurance which was their plan from jump. Does the state you're in have a state exchange?

Plans on the exchange are based on metallic tiers — platinum, gold, silver and bronze. The cheapest plans, the bronze, often pay only 60 percent of medical costs and have deductibles that are more than $2,300, putting them beyond the reach of many New Jersey families. Those who do not meet the "affordability" test are eligible to buy catastrophic coverage on the exchange, where plans are typically about $100 cheaper per month. Premiums are based, in part, on age. The older you get, the more health insurance costs because insurance companies believe older people are a greater risk for expensive care.

Are you denying that lower income people in states that implemented the ACA are covered by Medicaid?

Are you aware there are subsidies to cover higher deductibles?

"Your still stuck in this stupid ass bubble where"

It's YOU'RE. But anyway, do you know most dems support universal health care? Are you also aware the most repubs oppose what you seem to support? And actually you have it wrong as I've explained to you in the past, I am not a dem but they are closer to my ideology than the repubs so it is easier to reach my goals with them than the other party. You seem to young and idealistic to comprehend the long game and pragmatism. Keep up the name calling and accusations here, you're making a huge difference. Although on a side note you do seem to attack only dems so your agenda does not go unnoticed.

"The vast majority of the uninsured — an estimated 80 to 90 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office — who buy coverage on the exchanges will qualify for federal subsidies in the form of tax credits. Those who make up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level (about $46,000 for an individual and $94,200 for a family of four) will be eligible for the subsidies to help offset the cost of premiums.

Further, people with incomes up to 250 percent of the federal poverty level (about $28,700 for an individual and $58,900 for a family of four) will qualify for cost-sharing subsidies that will reduce deductibles, in some cases substantially."

From the Chicago Tribune.

So basically BiB, in your world the only choices are universal health care or what we had before the ACA? Since the ACA is the law of the land do you have any ideas to make it better or are you just going to call people Stephen on this site and nitpick?

It’s a sure bet that some consumers who make it through the web site’s maze, and enroll, will also have their subsidies calculated incorrectly.

Under current law, those who get more money than they were eligible for will see the excess payments clawed back on their subsequent years’ tax return.

As for the second category of subsidies, the cost sharing subsidies, the problems could be even worse.

Unlike subsidies for premiums, these subsidies are subject to cuts under the sequester. (The Commonwealth Fund drafted a lucid but unfortunately little-noticed summary of these problems earlier this year). What this means is that some of the reductions consumers expect in cost of their medical care will never materialize.

You seem to young and idealistic to comprehend the long game and pragmatism...

Spare me the elderly racket about the Long Game... You have no idea how old I am ....

You show me your intelligence daily by these "Rally the Troops " comments about Obamacare....

"The whole O-Bomber legacy will be... "I was attacked by Republicans!"

Or it will be he brought the world economy back from the brink of catastrophy, stopped 800,000 job losses and turned them into gains without the same leevl of government jobs and stimulus the previous presidents had in their recoveries, Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay act and of course the ACA which may or may not work but it was something no other previous president had done. Not to shabby considering the condition the previous guy left the country.

BiB, whom did you vote for in 2008 and 2012? I forget, you know us old folks.

Ive discusssed this at length several times with you and STEPHEN...

The senility must be really hitting you quite hard these days.... since you actually believe this garbage...

"Or it will be he brought the world economy back from the brink of catastrophy, stopped 800,000 job losses and turned them into gains without the same leevl of government jobs and stimulus the previous presidents had in their recoveries"

'educators' more and more reveal themselves to be programmed puppets spouting nonsense and calling it 'academia'...a bunch of prostitutes, just as the politicians, journalists, mega church preachers, lawyers, etc.

i did not make it that way...i simply call it like it reveals itself.

i have NO sacred golden calves. those that do will need to acquire emotional discipline, home training and acceptance of the fact that some of US are sent to kick dents in the golden calves BEFORE we rip them down.

'gay rights' is a white man's game. Blacks trying to attach themselves need more info asap! Black lesbians riding hard for the 'cause' appear confused...little do they know, the het woman 'breeders' are held in contempt. how much moreso those that don't even perform 'breeder' duties.

http://henrymakow.com/_left_albert_pike_1809-1891by.html

the bibles that are used to swear in selected political puppets are masonic bibles.

those in the higher masonic levels KNOW the deal. the dum dums at the bottom...not so much. the same is true for the 'gay rights' foot soldiers.

UNTIL you are ready to step to me to discuss THE KINSEY STUDIES/REPORTS/BOOKS...

i have nothing more to discuss with you. YOU, with your NON believing self made this a convo about Scriptures.

i AM not interested in discussing Scriptures with someone that lacks the spiritual gifts/fruit necessary to hold the discussion.

so go back to your masters and let them know...she insists on discussing the junk 'science' that props up the depraved debauchery that is being unleashed on the world by the HOMO WHITE MALE LUCIFER/SATANIC CULT that has hijacked the WORLD.

'scholar' my eyeball. lol.

folks REALLY need to be mindful of who they allow around their children. the mind molders have an agenda that has NOTHING to do with TRUE education nor enlightenment.

which gay org has made hobama diss racist holy evil moronic mfs like u since 2006???????

which one still????cc africom

what????

If the respect shown to black Americans does not match that which is shown to the gay community, Hispanic community and other demographics, then the Obama Administration has fallen woefully short in its duty to America. The president has stood strong for marriage equality for gay Americans, so I'm sure he'll understand those of us who stand up for political equality for African Americans. If the action and rhetoric is not equally respectful across the board, then it is entirely unacceptable. There are no two ways about it.

The saddest thing about the experience of the black political orphans in America is that when you ask them why they support the Obama administration, a large majority of them can only say "they're better than the Republicans." That's like a wife saying "I'll never divorce my husband because he's better than the man who used to beat me." Perhaps a more meaningful endorsement from his wife could be "I won't ever leave my husband because I am absolutely sure he loves me." Even the most ardent Obama supporter can't make such a claim.

The very same broken, two party political system that the Obama Administration complains about is the one that's keeping them in power. The black vote is held hostage with fear of a Republican presidency, not hope for a better future. Rather than being able to point to any evidence that black quality of life has improved over the last four years, they simply win the black vote by default. There is not much to celebrate about that and more should be expected from any politician who asks us for so much.

ps. folks that love women don't get down the way you have shamelessly carried yourself. lesbian or no. WHEN makow conducts himself like the depraved brute you have exampled...THEN i will entertain the notion of him 'hating' women.

i AM committed to NOT laughing when you next start to whine about 'sexism', when dealing with other folks with wives that seek to sexually degrade and denigrate women. lol.

my heart broke for Kanye West when i saw him on stage with the white shoeless guy.

i.see.clearly.

i Understand and pray the Kanye West will find the strength within to stand and turn his heart to Almighty. fear + follow NO man/woman/idol.

the red shoes. the animal print. the tapes. for those of us in the know...it ALL means something. folks are programmed with self destruct alters so i AM cautious to bring no harm in my effort to tell it. it's all Love.

peep the audio in the Kanye vid and see his brethren shout out that Yahushua (who the world has been fooled into nicknaming J-sus) is Blessed Black;)

what the enemy uses to destroy- Almighty turns to good. for those with an ear to hear...WILL hear THAT undeniable Truth:)!!!

i AM bound to give Him SOME PRAISE!!! WE WIN!!! as it is written..._____________________

those seeking to take out humanity see US/me and need to know the following- i urge ALL to take note of the Names i use when speaking from my Soul Spirit Truth:

i AM the bold, conquering servant of Yahweh Almighty...Creator and Sovereign of ALL. i AM eternally grateful for His Mercy and Grace in sending Messiah Yahushua, who died for my sins, if only i would believe in a world that hates for doing so. if HE be for me...that is enough for me. let's go!!! as i grab His Hand;)

i seek to bring NO shame to my Father Almighty. it is my prayer that He will continue to guide me, with laser like focused purpose, on His mission. to the lost ones, i will appear unfocused and that is ok;) i pray Almighty elevates them to a place where they may see and understand.

i thank and praise Him even now for the triple portions of His Blessings that He bestows on me and ALL souls that will simply humble themselves, put aside all false idols, and turn to + follow Him.

____________________

i have previously posted about baal. i AM aware of the conspiracy to cause humanity to forget our power, sovereign dominion, true history, and even Almighty.

changing names= disrespectful+ evil.

i have previously indicated there is a full fledged war for souls underway...

15 Study to shew thyself approved unto Almighty, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more un set apartness. _________________

(h-ly= baal. He showed me to replace it with set apart...which is what His are called to be in this dark + dying world.) there is leavening in our Daily Bread/Scriptures that we are live on as it is written.

many folks refuse to eat once of spiritual bread each day...while rushing for three squares of that which is NOT the most important for Spirit Man (mankind). is it any wonder there are so many spiritually dead + demon possessed among us?

gender war= humanity loses. Scriptures is not speaking to gender in many ways. Galatians 3:28 makes it real clear. divisions are distractions designed to destroy US. don't help your enemy destroy you...

i pray more will go to Scriptures and get familiar. whether you believe or not...what is written there is of great significance.

________________

UNIVERSAL LAW:

2 Tim 2:18-19

18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

19 Nevertheless the foundation of Almighty standeth sure, having this seal, The Sovereign knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Messiah depart from iniquity.

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When people try to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to follow them:

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev.1:9).The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7.In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanness (Lev.15:19-24).The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev.25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Lev.11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev.21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

i) I know from Lev.11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread cotton/polyester blend. He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them (Lev.24:10-16)? Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev.20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

I was just waiting for another one ????What is it about creepy young crakkas that make them want to shoot their classmates?Ooops don't flatter me Why? Not really interested in an short DICKs or big pussy comments/ thoughts Just read mine and learn to play chess entiende? Yes i am back!

The reason I ask BiB is you seem to be attacking the prez from the left but yet never seem too interested in typical leftist causes. My suspicion is that you are not blah as in your previous incarnation but you put up a picture you claim is you to erase suspicion. You only attack the prez but yet claim to be above petty politics and the typical left/right repub/dem dynamics. Your attacks have always been "hate the prez because you are blah". You are a curious fellow. If you are a true lefty we all know there are more targets out there other than the prez. So humor me once again with the questions I keep asking but never get answers.1. Why do you dislike the president?2. Do you have a true concern for the poor and uninsured?

i hate no one. i reserve the right to call it. folks can be as foamy mouth mad as they want to be.

free will.

as you were...

4:28 PM------------------Dear FP, I am amazed at your courage as a servant of GOD. I am a servant but pretty weak. There are times I seek approval from fools. That happens when I forget GOD and cut myself off from HIM.

I still carry that awful centuries old black gene of seeking my own self-worth from people who really could care less about me. Funny thing when I do that, I feel diminished and hate myself for doing it. Yet, I still find myself doing it again, although less and less as I continue to study, practice, meditate, pray and seek HIS will, not mine. This is, and has not been easy for me. I still don't know if I will make it when trembling before HIM in the end. I hope so. If not, I will die trying.

I still don't know 'why' I am afraid of the Sacred. Can you answer this?

Pilot..I've had a a very strong sense of dislike for this President since I recovered from cancer in 2009. I told u. And STEPHEN ....About 6000 times by now that I gave him the benefit of the doubt in 2008......I most certainly intensely disliked him afterwards and I took Great Pleasure in voting for Gary Johnson in 2012... Its disgustin the way you insinuate that in order to not like O you HAVE to be White........I don't speak to a whole lotta people because of it as well.....This constant O worshipping is what really ticks me off..along with Black folks like u defending him at every turn....purely pathetic ....

"Its disgustin the way you insinuate that in order to not like O you HAVE to be White"

No, the disgusting part is your whole screed was Black folks only like him because he was Black. Since you've been here you took to shaming Black folks for supporting the prez. The only people who do not understand he is naturally going to get support from the Black community is a white person.

".....This constant O worshipping is what really ticks me off..along with Black folks like u defending him at every turn....purely pathetic ...."

I know it does, white people don't understand it. I don't defend him at every turn but it sure seems like you attack him every chance you get. Are there ANY other politicians that offend you? Nobody else is stopping your goal of universal healthcare huh? you are way too transparent and get rid of the picture man, you ain't Black.

I know it does, white people don't understand it. I don't defend him at every turn

You Love O-Bomber ..

Theres ABSOLUTELY nothing he can do wrong in your eyes. Universal Healthcare is but one of many of my gripes with O-bomber , and his Unaffordable Affordable Health Care Act.

Again you show how pathetic you are when you call me white.. Its really getting old . Yes Im focusing on the first African American President who got my vote in 08 , but not in 2012. Only reason I voted was the right to critique. You cant debate me on any of the ideas or points that Ive outlined so you resort to cheap racial identity slander to prove an insignificant point.

No, the disgusting part is your whole screed was Black folks only like him because he was Black.

Look, as the chair of the Black Caucus I've got to tell you, we are always hesitant to criticize the president. With 14 percent [black] unemployment (PDF) if we had a white president we'd be marching around the White House.http://www.theroot.com/blogs/president-barack-obama/head-cbc-why-gay-marriage-will-cost-obama?wpisrc=root_lightbox

How messed up is this?

Imagine the outrage if ted cruz said he wasn't going to criticize a white president over black unemployment.

BIB, and Bill, you both are right. PilotX is nothing but a blind pathetic bm who worships Obama despite O's behavior and 'non-actions toward Blacks.

PilotX, you ARE disgusting. One other thing: YOU and FIELD ought to 'lose' the white name-calling bs. It is 'old' and it y makes you sound like ignorant Negroes in the hood who criticize others for using their brains.

i AM sent by Almighty with His Mouth to give His Universal Law. declare yourself His enemy based on nonsense you hallucinated if you must.

because i AM in control of the spirits in His Power+ Name, let me tell you how this will work...

you come for me, if hosted devils got you convinced it makes sense. i will happily with a heart full of praise for Him ignore you...until He says flip it. then i will do just that...that He might get the Glory;)

so show these folks how perverse your wicked heart can be. it is written folks speak that which is in their hearts...show 'em how real it gets on the spiritual battlefield.

know this as well:

____________________

UNIVERSAL LAW:

Luke 21: 15-18

15 For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist.

16 And ye shall be betrayed both by parents, and brethren, and kinsfolks, and friends; and some of you shall they cause to be put to death.

while lying and accusing me of being unfocused...folks are posting links from racist 'dr. laura' and some more real dumb stuff.

emotional discipline is underrated. may folks that need it desperately acquire it, stat.

what i would like to discuss is the kinsey report/books/studies.

i get why that can't happen...then even the dumbest among US would recognize the 'i hate all peds' assertion to be a LIE when the same mouth confesses that kinsey monster to be a 'hero'...

anything outside of that discussion is pointless rambling.

i have already shaken dust as it relates to Scripture convo. i share. soul rejects. shakes dust. those are my orders. i AM not instructed to argue with those of a reprobate mind.

maybe IF i narrow it down that will help the 'scholars'?

find the kinsey charts relating to child sexuality. THEN come again with the hero 'label' if the Truth is just not in you.

it saddens me that it is a BW that seeks to get the Almighty smackdown;(

He is no respecter of persons...neither am i. for now praise for Him. at His Word...it is ON.

i can only control what i control...so there will be no BW meltdown to the death catfight on the thread. i will continue to give His Law...that ALL on the planet will in due time have to BOW DOWN to...as it is written.

letting the chips fall where they may, is a part of the process;) i will try not to wind folks up and watch them spin out unhinged for kicks and giggles. lol.

__________________

UNIVERSAL LAW:

Proverbs 25:28- He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls.

'And if all that wasn’t bad enough, Kinsey himself defined signs of orgasm through a rapist’s lens. From Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, pgs 160-161:

Extreme tension with violent convulsions: …sudden heaving and jerking of the whole body… gasping… hands grasping, mouth distorted, sometimes with tongue protruding; whole body or parts of it spasmodically twitching…violent jerking of the penis…groaning, sobbing, or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears (especially among younger children)…extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting of subject…excruciating pain and may scream…

And most sinister of all, Kinsey makes this observation about the supposed orgasm of the victim:

…before the arrival of orgasm, will fight away from the partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax although they derive definite pleasure from the situation.

The Kinsey Institute has little debunking for that. They just hope you’ll accept the idea that a crying, screaming, trembling child who is violently trying to push a rapist off him is having an orgasm.'

__________________

HERO?

i pray the 'children' you teach are old enough to clock you and all other pervs one GOOD time. may they not be defenseless 'orgasmic' infants.

what you describe is a need for more trust...in Him. we are afraid that He will let US down as others do daily.

we accuse Him of being a liar when we act as if our blessings come from any source other than Him. whitening Almighty is a snare of the soul.

what the world teaches...the exact OPPOSITE is true in most cases. the world says Almighty is a white guy. the Truth, Almighty is a Black guy. lol.

it is written that He is NOT a man that He should lie. we must trust that+ seek Him like folks are seeking mammon + sex + perverted power these days. hard. with due diligence.

it is also important to remember to watch what we say. as long as the confession from your mouth is one of weakness...the Universe lines up and give you just that...weakness. speak what you want.

_________________

UNIVERSAL LAW:

Proverbs 18: 20-21

20 A man's belly shall be satisfied with the fruit of his mouth; and with the increase of his lips shall he be filled.

21 Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.

_________________

Anon, Les Brown famously advised for folks to fake it til they make it. if your spiritual legs are a bit shakey...this is a good way to get into gear. practice speaking powerful victorious life over yourself. go to Universal Law and meditate on what you find there.

shut out/off or compartmentalize the noise makers/noise. we are called to keep our eyes fixed on Him in this faith walk. don't look to the left nor the right. lean not on our understanding...look to Him and trust that He will direct your path, as it is written.

those that don't know Him with a hardened heart will NOT relate. i AM not speaking to them. the message He gave me to share is for those that want to know Him or know Him better.

__________________

folks are clowning here getting themselves all confused...but i have ALREADY shared the way of escape. bring all that you refuse to lay down and find one of His Anointed Ones. come in Truth and His Spirit...and you are safe by merely dwelling among His Anointed. hence my invite to come to my house. yet, folks hold onto lies of 'hatred'...smh. caught ALL UP in the snare of the defeated enemy;( it is ok...i have enough faith for a few and will stand in biblical Love in the gap and intercede on behalf of that soul;)

folks got to know His Law in order to leverage it. we receive not because we ask not. folks gotta know what questions to ask.

i pray that Almighty will send the whole host of heaven to touch this space. be ALL up in it. Heavenly Father, show these people who created ALL. in the Mighty Names of Yahweh and Yahushua Almighty, i pray. amein.

TWEET ME

@fieldnegro

Follow the The Field Negro via e-mail.

DISCLAIMER

*COMMENTS, LINKS, AND CUT AND PASTE ARTICLES, ARE NOT ALL ENDORSED BY THE PUBLISHER.

THIS BLOG claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

MORE DISCLAIMERS

***The views expressed on this site are the field's and the field's alone. They do not reflect the views of his employer, or any professional or legal organization with which he is affiliated.***

This is a commercial free blog.

Money is nice, but being able to speak my mind is better.

"Real talk: Daniel Rubin has a great little piece up wherein he chats with The Field Negro, the Philly-based blogger who sharply ponders all things black on a daily basis. (Seriously, if you’ve never checked in with TFN, you should: Its author, Wayne Bennett, is a fantastic read who can cut through bullshit like a hot knife through butter, which is a far grosser analogy than I wanted to make, but there you have it.)" ~Philebrity~

"One of the most precocious and hilarious Black political minds on the net. Ive been a long-time fan!" ~Asad Malik~

"..While most of what he writes is tongue-in-cheek, his space is a safe house for candid discussions about race, especially in the comments section, where people of all colors meet."~~Daniel Rubin, "The Philadelphia Inquirer"~~

"To white people, Bennett's musings are like kitchen-table talk from a kitchen they may otherwise never set foot in. To African Americans, he is part of a growing army of black Internet amateurs who have taken up the work once reserved for ministers and professional activists: the work of setting a black agenda, shaping black opinion and calling attention to the state of the nation's racial affairs."

~~Richard Fausset, "L.A. Times"~~~

"That's why I love the blog "Field Negro" so much. Field, as he's known to his fans, has the sense of reality that it takes to call out the (CowPuckey) of blame beating by those who are in positions of power and their lackeys. Because of his handle and his unabashed way of writing about racial issues, Field is often cited as a "Black blogger." What he is, however, is a first-class detector of blame deflection and an excellent student of history. If you want to write about the past and future of repression there's really no other perspective to take - which is why everyone should read Field."

"Half a century after Little Rock, the Montgomery bus boycott and the tumultuous dawn of the modern civil rights era, the new face of the movement is Facebook, MySpace and some 150 black blogs united in an Internet alliance they call theAfroSpear.

Older, familiar leaders such as Rev. Jesse Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton and NAACP Chairman Julian Bond, are under challenge by a younger generation of bloggers known by such provocative screen names as Field Negro, thefreeslaveand African American Political Pundit. And many of the newest struggles are being waged online."~Howard Witt-The Chicago Tribune~

"I had no idea, for example, of the extent of the African-American blogging world out there and its collective powers of dissemination.But now, after reading thousands of anguished, thoughtful comments posted on these blogs reflecting on issues of persistent racial discrimination in the nation's schools and courtrooms, what's clear to me is that there's a new, "virtual" civil rights movement out there on the Internet that can reach more people in a few hours than all the protest marches, sit-ins and boycotts of the 1950s and 60s put together." ~Chicago Tribune Reporter, Howard Witt~