Libs Sweating Bullets After Supreme Court Just Handed Trump The Best News Of His Entire Presidency

Winning, Winning and more Winning! Late last night President Trump won yet another legal battle against the American left wing and their bought and paid for activist judges and lackeys.

As expected, the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday night dismissed one of two cases over the President’s ban on visitors from majority Muslim nations. The court dismissed the case that originated in Maryland and involved a ban that has now expired and been replaced by a new version. But sadly the justices failed to take action on a separate case from Hawaii which was originated by Obama friend and lackey, Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin, who has been battling President Donald Trump over travel bans since February.

The one-page order states that the justices were unanimous in deciding against ruling in the Maryland case, although of course one of the liberal “Barry Soetoro” justices, Sonia Sotomayor, did note that she would not have wiped out the appeals court ruling in its entirety. The expired travel ban had included people from terrorist hotbeds such as Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, and Sudan.

The new “open-ended” ban, scheduled to take effect on Oct. 18, removed Sudan from the list while blocking people from Chad and North Korea and certain government officials from Venezuela from entering the United States. Because we are all aware how dangerous starving people from North Korea and Venezuela are, but that’s what you have to do to satisfy the liberal mindset. Wonder why they didn’t add Ireland to the mix, I hear those Irish are really dangerous to our nation’s security.

Other presidents have suspended immigration without having their orders derailed by the courts. Why is Trump’s executive order being treated differently?

On Thursday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals kept to its activist ways by refusing to allow President Trump’s executive order suspending the controversial U.S. refugee program to be in effect as it continues to wind its way through the courts. The three-judge panel that denied the administration’s request to lift the temporary restraining order on the executive order was unanimous in its decision.

The judges — William Canby Jr., a Jimmy Carter appointee; Richard Clifton, a George W. Bush appointee; and Michelle Friedland, a Barack Obama appointee — wrote in their decision that the executive order likely violates “what due process requires, such as notice and a hearing prior to restricting an individual’s ability to travel.” The decision also says the “it is the Government’s burden to make ‘a strong showing that [it] is likely to’ prevail against the States’ procedural due process claims” and that the court is “not persuaded that the Government has carried its burden for a staying appeal.”

In plain English, that means that the three-judge panel decided that the restraining order against Trump’s executive order is unlikely to be overturned by a higher court, so it sees no reason to lift the restraining order as this case works its way through the labyrinth of legal red tape it faces.

Of course, the point that is largely overlooked in all of this is that each of these judges was appointed by presidents who also had policies “restricting an individual’s ability to travel.” Let’s just spend a few minutes unpacking that as we work our way backward through the timeline.

As The New American reported in a previous article:

In 2015, Obama signed H.R. 158, the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015. That bill clarified “the grounds for ineligibility for travel to the United States regarding terrorism risk, to expand the criteria by which a country may be removed from the Visa Waiver Program, to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a report on strengthening the Electronic System for Travel Authorization to better secure the international borders of the United States and prevent terrorists and instruments of terrorism from entering the United States, and for other purposes.”

The Huffington Post reported at the time of that bill’s passage:

In what could be a sign the administration is moving away from a policy seen as discriminatory, the Obama administration announced Thursday that it is restricting visa-free travel to the U.S. for recent visitors to three additional countries — but not for dual nationals with those passports.

Under the new restrictions, citizens of the 38 countries that are part of the reciprocal visa-waiver program will lose their visa-free travel status if they have traveled to Libya, Somalia or Yemen within the past five years. Thursday’s announcement is an expansion of a law passed late last year, which revoked the visa-waiver status of people who had recently traveled to Iraq, Syria, Iran or Sudan, and who hold dual citizenship with any of those four countries.

Interestingly, not only did the liberal mainstream media celebrate those restrictions (as the example from the Huffington Post shows), but there were no legal challenges brought against H.R. 158, either. Also, to put in the for-what-its-worth-column, that bill — signed into law by Obama and allowed to stand without being issued a restraining order — is one part of the legal framework on which President Trump’s executive order rests.

Before that, though, in 2011, Obama’s State Department quietly halted all refugees from Iraq for a period of six months after it was discovered (to the surprise of no one paying attention) that terrorists who had actually fought against U.S. soldiers in Iraq had gained entry in the United States as “refugees” and were planning attacks here. It seemed that reason dictated a more stringent vetting process. Now where has this writer heard that recently?

Going a little further back, in 2002 — in the wake of 9/11 — both houses of Congress unamimously passed, and President Bush signed — H.R. 3525, the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act. This legislation restricted travel to the United States “from countries that are state sponsors of international terrorism” and created a vetting process so extreme that any vetting process Trump comes up with would have difficulty appearing anything but moderate by comparison. Of course, it was reasonable then and it is reasonable now. But to those looking to attack Trump’s policy on this issue so critical to national security, reason is a stranger. Evidence of that can be seen in the fact that 73 Democrats who voted to pass that law in 2002 are still sitting in office and are among those decrying the suppposed evils of Trump’s executive order which rests as much on the legal framework of H.R. 3525 as it does on Obama’s H.R. 158.

H.R.3525 is still on the books and in effect, granting the president the authority to stop the issuance of non-immigrant visas from the very countries Trump’s executive order names. And as Conservative Review noted, Trump merely applied that law in conjunction with his authority under The Immigration and Nationality Act (§ 212(f)) which grants the president plenary power to “by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants.”

The next stop on our trip in the Wayback Machine is to April 7, 1980. America was in the midst of the Iranian hostage crisis. Five months into the 444-day-long ordeal, President Carter responded by issuing a series of proclamations under his executive authority. Here, in his own words, is the one that is germane to this issue:

Fourth, the Secretary of Treasury [State] and the Attorney General will invalidate all visas issued to Iranian citizens for future entry into the United States, effective today. We will not reissue visas, nor will we issue new visas, except for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country requires. This directive will be interpreted very strictly.

Now, here — in the present — three judges (appointed by presidents who not only did essentially the same thing Trump is doing, but laid the legal foundation and set the precedent for his actions) have the nerve to pretend that while it was fine and dandy when their presidents did it, it is somehow unconstitutional when Trump does it.

And there’s the rub. Constitutionality is not a matter of who (or which party) holds the office and issues the directives; it is a matter of what the Constitution allows and requires. In this case, Article IV, Sec. 4 of that Constitution seems apropos:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

President Trump’s executive order is a balanced attempt to secure the borders of this nation against a terrorist invasion under the guise of a refugee program. The alternative is an open-door policy that allowed Iraqi terrorists to enter this country in the wake of 9/11. President Obama blocked those “refugees” then and if his actions lacked prudence it was that they did not go far enough. The salient point, though, is that no one accused him of overstepping his Constitutional boundaries in taking the action he did. Or Bush before him. Or Carter before him. Why is this any different?

It’s really starting to look like no matter how hard the left tries they just can’t seem to get a leg up on President Trump. This particular case makes it even harder for them to win when you see how former President Barack Hussein Obama did the exact same thing. But with him it was OK because he’s black and has an Islamic name, let’s not kid ourselves here.

Al ran for the California State Assembly in his home district in 2010 and garnered more votes than any other Republican since 1984. He's worked on multiple political campaigns and was communications director for the Ron Nehring for California Lt. Governor campaign during the primaries in 2014. He has also held multiple positions within his local Republican Central Committee including Secretary, and Vice President of his local California Republican Assembly chapter. While also being an ongoing delegate to the California Republican Party for almost a decade.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

BREAKING!! Pence Just Made MAJOR Announcement About Border Wall That NOBODY Saw Coming

One of President Donald Trump’s biggest campaign promises that has yet to come to fruition is the much-anticipated border wall that’s been met with a lot of leftist opposition for it and delayed due to endless hurdles to have to cross. The question of if construction will happen or when it will within his first term has recently come up after funding arguments between the U.S. and Mexico have persisted, with neither side backing down. Now, Vice President Mike Pence had just come forward with a shocking announcement that has taken the entire country by complete surprise.

After news first broke last week about possible funding for the wall coming from a single ironic source, the reality of a tightly secured border with a barrier going up between the U.S. and Mexico became a sudden reality. Senator Ted Cruz proposed a bill calling for all “$14 billion seized from cartel drug lord Joaquin ‘El Chapo’ Guzman to be used to pay for the President’s border wall between the U.S. and Mexico,” according to Breitbart, as we previously reported.

Although the bill is absolutely genius and solves the biggest issue in building the wall, it has yet to pass and chances are unlikely it will since defiant liberals have a say in it. However, where there is a will, there is a way, and Americans know they can count on Trump to find it which leads us to today’s unexpected announcement.

Perhaps proposing this funding idea inspired others to generously pitch in, should it not go through. Leave it to our current administration to make this happen and not disappoint on this anticipated promise, or wait for liberals to deny the opportunity to fund it with El Chapo’s seized drug money. Mike Pence announced today on Twitter: “We achieved the largest increase in border security funding in 10 yrs, w/ enough money to make a down payment on the border wall.”

The good news didn’t end there, he had more a few minutes later on Twitter that was sure to brighten Americans’ day. “This budget bill, under @POTUS‘ leadership, also includes important health care resources for our great coal miners,” he Tweeted. A few minutes later, he announced that “There is no long-term bailout for the insurance companies that the Democrats wanted to subsidize the badly failing Obamacare.” He made one final statement, ending on a solid note, before closing his flurry of financial statements.

“After years of partisan bickering and gridlock, this budget bill is a clear win for the American people.”

In just over his first 100 days in office, Trump managed to get the biggest increase in border security funding than we saw within the last decade — which was mostly due to the gridlock the country was in because of the Barack Obama era. He received $1.51 billion to secure our border and finally get a solid start on it, which we can now see could happen in his first term after even conservatives were rightfully concerned that it wouldn’t.

This doesn’t solve all of the financial issues in building the wall, but it’s far better than anything Obama ever did. Now, if Senator Cruz’s bill would pass to free up El Chapo’s billions for this wall, the country would be much safer sooner.

Democrat Senior United States Senator in New York, Chuck Schumer, is the reason the government went on lockdown this week because he wanted more money for illegals than he did for our military. The shutdown was resolved when he folded like a cheap suit after acting as the hero for these so-called “Dreamers” who ended up with nothing after Schumer cost active military several days of pay. It was a loss on all accounts for his stupid statement and now he’s paying for it in a personal way with who just stormed his New York City house. He had it coming!

When liberals and illegals don’t get what they want they have only one reaction. Schumer is feeling the full wrath of that now as Trump gets the last laugh.

In the hours after U.S. senators struck a deal to end the government shutdown Monday, scores gathered near the U.S. Capitol to protest what they saw as the Democrats’ decision to abandon the “dreamers,” young undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children or overstayed their visas.

One by one, the demonstrators called out the names of Democrats who voted with Republicans to end the shutdown, shouting, “Shame!”

On Tuesday, a group of about 100 protesters gathered again, rallying in Upper Senate Park and then heading to lawmakers’ offices to demand the vote on immigration legislation that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has vaguely promised.

Those protests continue now into the dark and have also taken a turn down Schumer’s street where he lives in New York City, which isn’t coincidental. They thought he was going to be the guy to give them what he wanted, but he caved and now they’re showing him one of the reasons Trump is so strong on immigration. They aren’t here to work, they overstayed their visas, and don’t want all the freebies of living in our free country to be taken away.

Breitbart was there live to show the “Dreamers” storming Schumer’s personal residence. He can advocate for them all he wants, thinking that there’s no threat of having to face the consequences of his deplorable decisions for American citizens. However, now he’s getting the perfect dose of karma.

Walter Barrientos, of the immigrant rights organization Make the Road New York, said his group and those aligned with it have sponsored actions in New York as well as in downtown Washington, holding rallies and vigils in Manhattan and at the home of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), who led the shutdown effort but then backed down over the weekend.

“Dreamers” and their advocates gather near the U.S. Capitol on Monday to declare their frustration at the reopening of the federal government without protections for immigrants.

“We are planning on being relentless in our pressure for the next two weeks,” Barrientos said. “We can’t allow him to fail us again.”

Since the Trump administration announced in September that it would phase out the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, immigrants and their advocates have protested, flooded congressional offices and been arrested in acts of civil disobedience, all in an effort to force a vote on legislation that would allow dreamers to stay legally in the United States.

Senate Democrats, led by Schumer, forced a government shutdown last week, refusing to support a last-minute spending bill if it did not include protections for dreamers.

But by Monday, after a weekend of Republican claims that Democrats had “prioritized illegal immigrants over American citizens,” senators from swing states were telling Schumer that their stance could hurt them, badly, in November’s midterm elections.

The Democrats then accepted a deal they had rejected Sunday — agreeing to reopen the government as long as McConnell said “it would be my intention” to consider immigration legislation in coming weeks.

There are multiple competing efforts in both chambers of Congress to determine what such legislation would say, however. And even if a bill allowing dreamers to stay passed the Senate, it could face an uphill battle in the more conservative House.

“Senators who voted today for the promise of a symbolic vote on the Dream Act are not resisting Trump — they are enablers,” Cristina Jiménez, executive director and co-founder of United We Dream, the nation’s largest immigrant-youth-led organization, said Monday. “Republicans played games too, holding the Dream Act hostage and pitted the safety of immigrant youth against children’s health care, proving their cruelty to the world.”

Schumer needs to let all his Dreamer friends in, take his own advice and see how that ends up. If it’s good for America then he should open up his own home and prove it. Stand by your Socialistic convictions and share your wealth, better than taxpayers being taxed.

HILARIOUS!! Black Bro GOES OFF On DACA & Liberal Lawmakers! (VIDEO)

An African American took the mic and wowed the crowd as he stood up for every American. He voiced his opinion against DACA and sanctuary cities, and the audience gave him a round of applause each time he made an excellent point that real Americans agree with. A cranky old liberal lawmaker lady tried silencing the speaker after he made so many good points. Thankfully, he didn’t back down. He put her in her place. That’s how it is in California! If you have an opinion that’s not liberal, then they try to hush you up. They don’t want you to speak. They don’t want your more logical views being heard by the masses because they risk losing Democrat votes. More importantly, they don’t want people of color to talk like a Republican or even a centrist who’s weighing their options before making a decision.

The liberal lawmakers in California couldn’t contain this man as he hit a grand slam with each point he smashed into the liberal lawmakers. He was respectful, based on fact, and the crowd was behind him. That’s exactly why and when the liberal lawmaker lady jumped in to try and put a muzzle on him like he’s a dog. The sad truth about California comes out in this video. The liberal lawmakers don’t want people of color speaking up and fighting back.

DACA is a strain and the majority of recipients don’t offer anything productive to America. Sanctuary cities cause people to get hurt, and every Democrat who supports them has blood on their hands.

He starts off strong with expressing that he doesn’t want his tax money spent on illegal immigrants. He reminds people that he’s the one who lives in the neighborhoods being ruined by DACA and sanctuary citizens who provide drugs to the citizens.

He then reminds the liberal lady that her brother was a “one-termer” and if she’s not careful, then she will be too.

Next, a black mother who is homeless calls out the lawmaker for helping the illegal immigrants instead of helping Americans. She called her out for assisting illegal immigrants because the citizens are being thrown on the streets. She then mentions how the illegals attacked her son. A man who sounds like a puppet tries to silence her.

After that, a Latina woman stands up and fights back against illegal immigrants. She points out that we cannot afford to help illegals with our tax dollars. She reminds them that she became a citizen the legal way and that California taxpayers are funding illegal activity.

Another Latina woman stands up and fights back against the lawmakers. She reminds people to look at the Constitution. She tells them that 30% of Hispanics voted for Trump. She asked the liberal lawmakers what part of “illegal” don’t they understand?

The last person to speak is an immigrant from Honduras. They discuss the trouble with sanctuary cities and how it’s a strain on our economy and country.

“Here’s a guy who lives in ‘the hood’, who went before his government to testify, and he is making his case for why California’s whole approach to sanctuary cities and unlimited immigration is not just wrong, it’s dangerous and immoral.

He goes down a long list of all the things we’re not supposed to admit about the criminal aliens (since people are ‘sensitive’ to the term ‘illegal immigrants’) that are being massively imported to his neighborhood.

He tells you about the cocaine, and about the fake ID’s, and about all kinds of fake-ness.

“And if Mr Trump would allow us, I’d organize some brothers and we’d put all your asses under some citizens’ arrest who are illegal”

He starts pointing around the room at elected officials. You I like. I like your decisions. Your daddy was great. Your brother was a one-termer, and if you don’t watch yourself, you’ll be a one-termer. He Loves Catherine Barber, but just don’t be with that bullcrap.”

California has a lot of problems. It’s one of the most talked about states in the country, but not for good reasons. They brainwash kids with an LGBT material in schools. They allow people to give others HIV purposely and it’s not a felony. They accept illegal immigrants like they’re collecting baseball cards. They hoard criminals in sanctuary cities so they can watch victims be raped, mugged, and robbed without being deported by ICE. What is this? A horror story or the state of California?

California has become one of the worst states in the country and it’s finally time that the level-headed citizens speak out, fight back, and continue to be heard.

It’s sad that these old white liberal lawmakers who live in nice neighborhoods, drive nice cars, and probably have the latest expensive phone are trying to silence the minorities.

You thought Democrats cared about minorities? That’s only if they have your vote. If you’re a minority and not voting Democrat, then you’re just another person they don’t care about.