>>9833342Do you have proof people can reliably tell the difference in the first place?I'm not sure either way personally, but everything I've seen so far is claiming there isn't a difference people can reliably notice and that if you think you can notice a difference you're just imagining it.http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/11/magazine/11fob-consumed-t.html>The Coca-Cola Company is by now quite familiar with the Mexican Coke cult. It is true, acknowledges a Coke spokesman, Scott Williamson, that different sweeteners are used by the company’s bottling partners in different parts of the world, for reasons having to do with price and availability. But, he says, “all of our consumer research indicates that from a taste standpoint, the difference is imperceptible.”>inb4 someone complains Coca-Cola is biased, I'm not saying they're right and am actively soliciting better evidence from the rest of you if you have any

>>9833503That's not evidence for people being able to tell the difference between HFCS and white sugar.For one thing Coke and Pepsi don't have the same amount of calories and Pepsi has more HFCS / sugar (which is why they don't have the same amount of calories), so it's not very surprising people would pick the higher sugar content drink.I don't know of a similar taste test ran to see if people can tell apart HFCS and white sugar when the calorie content is kept equal, which again, is why I'm asking for evidence.

>>9833369>>this should sould surprize you about HFCS if it ends in OSE IT CONTAINS SUGAR. doesnt matter what kind.companies do it to make the food taste better.remember if it says fat free what else have they put in it to make it taste good? the other is salt.

I started working in amish country and I pass by the town of trail, where trail bologna originated, It's stuff I've been eating my whole life, and is excellent with cheese and crackers.Is this stuff in your area too, have you heard of it, do you like it?

Holy shit, just looked up the history of trail bologna and found that the town it's named for is really close to where I live. Never knew that. I love history and especially food history.Also, trail bologna is bomb ass food and is fucking incredible with Amish cheeses.Good taste, OP.

Looking for 5 (keto) recipies that a lazy depressed person can cook? Right now, having frozen cauliflower/brussel sprouts with two eggs and miso for breakfast. And pretty much the same for dinner but two chicken thighs

heat 100ml or so of heavy cream in a saucepan, chip in some cheddar, stir over low heat until melted together. Optional: toss in a few grams of cornstarch and keep heating and stirring for a while, this thickens the sauce and won't put you over the carb limit, but you can ignore this if you want.

Meanwhile, boil some cauliflower florets for a few minutes, then drain and put in a baking dish. Pour the cheese sauce over this, put some shredded cheese on top, and throw it in the oven at 350F for 20-30 minutes until nice and brown.

While you're at it, stick a steak in the broiler and let that cook while the rest of the stuff is also cooking.

Or else, while the above is cooking, put some oil in a frying pan and throw a slab of salmon in it to cook. Flip after a few minutes so both sides get done.

Is Foie Gras the most sadistic food, or is there something even worse?Not even saying animals are our equals or that we shouldn't eat meat or anything like that, but what the fuck, how can people spend eight weeks pouring fat into pipes shoved down duck throats just to get a slightly better tasting end product? They're already dying so we can eat, the least we can do is not make their last weeks on Earth a living Hell.Other bad one I've heard of is dog meat in Korea, where they traditionally beat the dog to death under the assumption the dog's elevated adrenaline will make their meat taste sweeter. That still doesn't seem as bad to me as having a pipe loading fat directly into my stomach for eight weeks though. I would without hesitation take the getting beaten to death option if I had to choose, at least that way I'd be dead in a few minutes.

>>9833416>More time as in it takes 3 months instead of 2 months for them to get to the desired weight?Yes. I'm not the guy you were arguing with but its clear natural feeding makes them ingurgitate less food.

>>9833425>its clear natural feeding makes them ingurgitate less food.OK, well that's the original point, that they don't eat that much naturally, so claiming they do isn't true.If you could honestly get them to eat as much as what they eat with force feeding but without force feeding then nobody would be force feeding in the first place.

>>9830452This. It isn't to see if the wine meets your approval. It's because sometimes bottles end up corked, and corked bottles get sent back. Can't tell if a bottle is corked without smelling the wine. No restaurant will make anyone pay for a corked bottle. Hell, my wine shops will accept corked bottles as returns for full credit, because they get credit from the distributor for any corked bottles.