You cannot 'solicit' a child for 'prostitution', it is rape because the child cannot consent. Period. And yes, there are some children who try to do this completely on their own for money or things, but again...any who take advantage of that are committing rape.

Lady Indica:You cannot 'solicit' a child for 'prostitution', it is rape because the child cannot consent. Period. And yes, there are some children who try to do this completely on their own for money or things, but again...any who take advantage of that are committing rape.

Oldiron_79:Luse: degenerate-afro: Luse: degenerate-afro: Age of consent is 16 in Maryland so there's not really much to debate. Also nice that the article posts his home address before he's officially charged.

So how is that relevant when the girl is 14?

That's why I said "there's not really much to debate"

Rather odd thing to say. I'm not aware of any state where the age of consent is 14 or lower.

So why do you need to check the consent ages in various states? Why dont you have a seat over here.

Something like 15 years ago I knew a guy who was well versed in age of consent laws from all over. Dude pulled in crazy amounts of super-hot tail. Also, he has a gimpy hand. I don't know how he managed it, but he's still kind of hero of mine.

Luse:degenerate-afro: Luse: degenerate-afro: Age of consent is 16 in Maryland so there's not really much to debate. Also nice that the article posts his home address before he's officially charged.

So how is that relevant when the girl is 14?

That's why I said "there's not really much to debate"

Rather odd thing to say. I'm not aware of any state where the age of consent is 14 or lower.

It's relevant because what he's getting at is the age of consent is 16. The girl was under 16. Therefore it is statutory rape, period. No arguments, no debates, no gray area, no special circumstances in play, no loopholes. Statutory rape.

C18H27NO3:Luse: degenerate-afro: Luse: degenerate-afro: Age of consent is 16 in Maryland so there's not really much to debate. Also nice that the article posts his home address before he's officially charged.

So how is that relevant when the girl is 14?

That's why I said "there's not really much to debate"

Rather odd thing to say. I'm not aware of any state where the age of consent is 14 or lower.

It's relevant because what he's getting at is the age of consent is 16. The girl was under 16. Therefore it is statutory rape, period. No arguments, no debates, no gray area, no special circumstances in play, no loopholes. Statutory rape.

C18H27NO3:Luse: degenerate-afro: Luse: degenerate-afro: Age of consent is 16 in Maryland so there's not really much to debate. Also nice that the article posts his home address before he's officially charged.

So how is that relevant when the girl is 14?

That's why I said "there's not really much to debate"

Rather odd thing to say. I'm not aware of any state where the age of consent is 14 or lower.

It's relevant because what he's getting at is the age of consent is 16. The girl was under 16. Therefore it is statutory rape, period. No arguments, no debates, no gray area, no special circumstances in play, no loopholes. Statutory rape.

Could be stuff going on that's causing the delay. He might be cooperating in the investigation into trying to find out who's pimping her and if there are others involved. Could also be issues with credibility of the victim and/or victim cooperation. The important thing is that he's been suspended without pay and will be charged.

robohobo:C18H27NO3: Luse: degenerate-afro: Luse: degenerate-afro: Age of consent is 16 in Maryland so there's not really much to debate. Also nice that the article posts his home address before he's officially charged.

So how is that relevant when the girl is 14?

That's why I said "there's not really much to debate"

Rather odd thing to say. I'm not aware of any state where the age of consent is 14 or lower.

It's relevant because what he's getting at is the age of consent is 16. The girl was under 16. Therefore it is statutory rape, period. No arguments, no debates, no gray area, no special circumstances in play, no loopholes. Statutory rape.

Is the prostitute being charged with prostitution?

Perhaps the minor who was coerced by a law enforcement officer gets a break. Even a public defender can should get those charges dropped.

robohobo:Oldiron_79: Luse: degenerate-afro: Luse: degenerate-afro: Age of consent is 16 in Maryland so there's not really much to debate. Also nice that the article posts his home address before he's officially charged.

So how is that relevant when the girl is 14?

That's why I said "there's not really much to debate"

Rather odd thing to say. I'm not aware of any state where the age of consent is 14 or lower.

So why do you need to check the consent ages in various states? Why dont you have a seat over here.

Something like 15 years ago I knew a guy who was well versed in age of consent laws from all over. Dude pulled in crazy amounts of super-hot tail. Also, he has a gimpy hand. I don't know how he managed it, but he's still kind of hero of mine.

18 is arbitrary nonsense given today's sex culture.

Well if you was like 19 where it would not be creepy to nail a 16 year old (if legal) I could see having a need to know consent ages.

If you are well into your 30s where you could just about have a kid in the jailbait age range you have no need to know the minimum age as you should be sleeping with nothing vaguely close to that.

Could be stuff going on that's causing the delay. He might be cooperating in the investigation into trying to find out who's pimping her and if there are others involved. Could also be issues with credibility of the victim and/or victim cooperation. The important thing is that he's been suspended without pay and will be charged.

Well, the thing is if such a charge had been levied against me, I doubt I would get "suspended without pay". Almost any employer would drop you like a hot rock. And since this has been made public it pretty much blows any further investigation as her pimp will probably disengage from the whole situation.

It sounds like anything beyond charging this guy with solicitation is going to hinge on the 14 year old's word. Will she incriminate him? Will she be too scared to do so? Who knows?

Could be stuff going on that's causing the delay. He might be cooperating in the investigation into trying to find out who's pimping her and if there are others involved. Could also be issues with credibility of the victim and/or victim cooperation. The important thing is that he's been suspended without pay and will be charged.

Or... he might just be a cop caught farking up and justice is going slow because reasons.

fark this guy likely there is no pimp in this situation don't be so damn obtuse.

Oldiron_79:Luse: degenerate-afro: Luse: degenerate-afro: Age of consent is 16 in Maryland so there's not really much to debate. Also nice that the article posts his home address before he's officially charged.

So how is that relevant when the girl is 14?

That's why I said "there's not really much to debate"

Rather odd thing to say. I'm not aware of any state where the age of consent is 14 or lower.

So why do you need to check the consent ages in various states? Why dont you have a seat over here.

I think after the sun rises and the Fark Pedo Brigade gets here, you'll better understand the comment.

Lady Indica:You cannot 'solicit' a child for 'prostitution', it is rape because the child cannot consent. Period. And yes, there are some children who try to do this completely on their own for money or things, but again...any who take advantage of that are committing rape.

/bows out before the pro pedo shiat starts

On the one hand anyone who solicits a 14 year old should be thrown in Jail. On the other anyone who says Traci Lords' movies were child porn has a weird idea of what a child is.

Tyrone Slothrop:Lady Indica: You cannot 'solicit' a child for 'prostitution', it is rape because the child cannot consent. Period. And yes, there are some children who try to do this completely on their own for money or things, but again...any who take advantage of that are committing rape.

/bows out before the pro pedo shiat starts

On the one hand anyone who solicits a 14 year old should be thrown in Jail. On the other anyone who says Traci Lords' movies were child porn has a weird idea of what a child is.

It's not like the Craigslist ad said she was 14. I'm sure the pimp vouched for her age.

Tyrone Slothrop:Lady Indica: You cannot 'solicit' a child for 'prostitution', it is rape because the child cannot consent. Period. And yes, there are some children who try to do this completely on their own for money or things, but again...any who take advantage of that are committing rape.

/bows out before the pro pedo shiat starts

On the one hand anyone who solicits a 14 year old should be thrown in Jail. On the other anyone who says Traci Lords' movies were child porn has a weird idea of what a child is.

So you are saying that the dividing line between child porn and non-child porn is 14/15?

(Traci was 15 when she made her first films. According to the Wikipedia (yeah, I know), she had a fake drivers license saying she was 20.)

robohobo:C18H27NO3: Luse: degenerate-afro: Luse: degenerate-afro: Age of consent is 16 in Maryland so there's not really much to debate. Also nice that the article posts his home address before he's officially charged.

So how is that relevant when the girl is 14?

That's why I said "there's not really much to debate"

Rather odd thing to say. I'm not aware of any state where the age of consent is 14 or lower.

It's relevant because what he's getting at is the age of consent is 16. The girl was under 16. Therefore it is statutory rape, period. No arguments, no debates, no gray area, no special circumstances in play, no loopholes. Statutory rape.

joeshill:Tyrone Slothrop: Lady Indica: You cannot 'solicit' a child for 'prostitution', it is rape because the child cannot consent. Period. And yes, there are some children who try to do this completely on their own for money or things, but again...any who take advantage of that are committing rape.

/bows out before the pro pedo shiat starts

On the one hand anyone who solicits a 14 year old should be thrown in Jail. On the other anyone who says Traci Lords' movies were child porn has a weird idea of what a child is.

So you are saying that the dividing line between child porn and non-child porn is 14/15?

(Traci was 15 when she made her first films. According to the Wikipedia (yeah, I know), she had a fake drivers license saying she was 20.)

One of the biggest fears I had when I was still young enough to date like 18-20 year olds without it being creepy was that she would be underage with a fake ID to get into clubs and whatnot instead of actually that age.

joeshill:Tyrone Slothrop: Lady Indica: You cannot 'solicit' a child for 'prostitution', it is rape because the child cannot consent. Period. And yes, there are some children who try to do this completely on their own for money or things, but again...any who take advantage of that are committing rape.

/bows out before the pro pedo shiat starts

On the one hand anyone who solicits a 14 year old should be thrown in Jail. On the other anyone who says Traci Lords' movies were child porn has a weird idea of what a child is.

So you are saying that the dividing line between child porn and non-child porn is 14/15?

(Traci was 15 when she made her first films. According to the Wikipedia (yeah, I know), she had a fake drivers license saying she was 20.)

Well, as far as I know no one coerced her in to doing it (unlike the solicitation situation); and teens do have sex, whether society approves or not, so I have trouble getting upset about that situation. Plus unlike some people I make a distinction between prepubescence (definitely a child) and post pubescence (possibly a child).

Tyrone Slothrop:Well, as far as I know no one coerced her in to doing it (unlike the solicitation situation); and teens do have sex, whether society approves or not, so I have trouble getting upset about that situation. Plus unlike some people I make a distinction between prepubescence (definitely a child) and post pubescence (possibly a child).

They are both "definitely a child". I just wouldn't consider a person a pedo if the girl already has secondary sexual characteristics, but a child is a child