Wednesday, 13 November 2013

Suppressed Free Energy Science

Suppressed Free Energy Science

A SUMMARY REVIEW of ENERGY and
ANTI-GRAVITY RESEARCH

Compiled
by Anthony J. Craddock with assistance from Dr.
Paul LaViolette and other researchers

Since the time of the great Nikola Tesla (and before), a
small sector of the scientific community has known that so-called "free
energy" can be extracted from our surroundings, and that many other exotic
forces and effects, such as "anti-gravity", are also waiting to be
liberated at our beck and call.

In his 1899 Colorado Springs experiments, Tesla
discovered the electro-gravitational (or scalar) wave, which oscillate the
energy density of the vacuum and hence oscillate the curvature of space-time.
So, over a century ago, it appears that Tesla had already produced a unified
field theory of gravitation and electromagnetics. His discoveries were so
fundamental, and his intent to provide free energy for all humankind was so
clear, that it was probably responsible for the withdrawal of his financial
backing, his deliberate isolation, and the gradual removal of his name from the
history books.

The zero-point energy of a vacuum
is the lowest energy vacuum state, with fluctuations taken into account. Even
at low energies, quantum fluctuations continually arise, and result in an
incessant, extremely rapid and violent "jittering" of the energy
momentarily present. The minimum energy due to these quantum fluctuations is
called the zero-point energy. The amount of this energy is HUGE. Some
scientists have hypothesized that one cubic centimeter of pure vacuum contains
enough energy to condense into 1080 – 10120 grams of
matter! Quantum mechanically, no system of interest (including even space-time
itself) can have zero energy. The so-called "free energy" is actually
obtained by tapping into the above-described zero-point energy.

The bedrock of much of modern science is Classical
Electromagnetic Theory (CEM). James Clark Maxwell developed this 136 years ago
in an exotic algebra known as quaternions. In order to render it more
assimilable for use by working electrodynamicists, it was deliberately
re-written in much simpler language by Oliver Heaviside (and Gibbs) in 1903.
This simplification (and truncation) eliminated a whole subset of the equations
including the scalar electromagnetics and the gravitational aspects that were
contained in the original theory. At last count, there are at least thirty-four
known flaws in Clark Maxwell’s hoary old theory, which is what is still taught
in today’s classrooms. Some of the world’s leading scientists, such as Wheeler,
Feynman, Bunge, Margenau, Barrett, Cornille, Evans, Vigier, and Lehnert have
all written about CEM’s deficiencies.

When this missing "Heaviside subset" of
Classical Electromagnetic Theory is restored, and the brilliant 1903 and 1904
work of a Cambridge University mathematician, E.T. Whittaker, factored in, all
of a sudden one has the supposedly elusive Holy Grail of Science – a true
Unified Field Theory that unites General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Mind
and Subtle Energy Phenomena and Classical EM Theory.

But in fact, for the advancement of humanity, the
real Holy Grail could be argued to actually be contained in this missing
subset, not in the more grandiose sounding Unified Field Theory.

For it is this "scalar potential" that
stresses local space-time, i.e. the 3 spatial dimensions AND time, which allows
the "bleed-through" of additional electromagnetic energy to create
overunity electromagnetic systems. Indeed, the restoration of this missing
subset also shows that Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity was also only a
subset of the real theory that he was trying to write. Even though Einstein has
been lionized for his theory of General Relativity (Time Magazine "Man of
the Century"), he himself is on record as saying that the so-called
foundations of physics need constant review, and that his Relativity Theory was
not necessarily cast in concrete.

A further impediment to the theoretical extraction
of "free" energy was also imposed on what was left of Maxwell’s
already diluted EM Theory by H.A. Lorentz around 1902. He simply arbitrarily
threw away the monstrous amount of current outside the circuit that was not
intercepted by the circuit, and that he could not theoretically account for.
This he termed "of no physical significance!" – even though it is
approximately 1013 times greater than the intercepted current in our
everyday electrical circuits! He thus perpetually locked EM systems in a
theoretical and figurative iron box that would never allow them to go overunity
and bleed in and capture additional energy.

Energy cannot be created or destroyed, and examples
abound of where systems (such as heat-pumps or windmills) put out more energy
than they take in, simply by transducing other energy sources. This is called
overunity, when the outputted energy added to additional transduced energy from
another source puts out more energy than is provided by the original primary
source. Conventional science "allows" this in every aspect of
"conventional science" WITH THE SOLE (ARBITRARY) EXCEPTION OF
ELECTROMAGNETISM.

But, by not "allowing" the curvature of
space-time locally, which is a way to open the gate to the "free"
vacuum energy, one can well see why some entrenched economic interests have
discouraged investigation of this physicist into this awesome source of energy.
Indeed, we have been told that the US Patent Office has strict instructions not
to allow any Patent for a meaningful overunity electromagnetic system or one
that would appear to threaten the status quo of our present power suppliers.

Occasionally, however, the veil does inadvertently
get lifted on some of the wondrous suppressed overunity systems, only to
quickly be dropped again.

Here are a few examples:

Tesla’s Self-Powered Automobile

In 1931, in a very secret program, Tesla built an
overunity, self-powered electrical power system, placed it in a Pierce
Arrow automobile, and ran the car around successfully. A relative who rode with
him in the car confirmed it many years later. Some details are described in
Marc Seifer’s biography of Tesla as follows:

"The car [was] a standard Pierce
Arrow, with the engine removed and other components installed instead. The
standard clutch, gearbox, and drive train remained… Under the hood, there was a
brushless electric motor, connected to [or in place of] the engine… Tesla would
not divulge who made the motor."

"Set into the dash was a "power
receiver" consisting of a box… containing 12 radio tubes… A vertical
antenna, consisting of a 6 ft. rod, was installed and connected to the power
receiver [which was] in turn, connected to the motor by two heavy, conspicuous
cables… Tesla pushed these in before starting and said: ‘We now have
power."

This Tesla device seems to have been remarkably
similar to the radiant energy amplifier of T. Henry Moray described below.
Also, Tesla coined the term "radiant energy" with respect to natural
media in two of his patents.

Further, we have Barrett’s mathematical
demonstration that Tesla’s actual patented circuits, when viewed in a higher
topology, did indeed freely shuttle energy in the circuit as desired. In short,
it appears that Tesla knew how to make circuits that asymmetrically
self-regauged themselves creating overunity systems and therefore self-powering
systems.

This is an entirely different operation than just
the present entropic transfer of voltage used by electrical engineers today. It
is more akin to deliberately regauging desired sections of the circuit, so that
excess energy appears there from an external source. In short, it is akin to
asymmetrical self-regauging, and also to the type of operation of circuits that
Kron (discussed below) discovered so laboriously but never entirely revealed.

No technical details were ever released on how
Tesla’s self-powered automobile system worked. The Tesla papers eventually
turned over to his native country did not contain the actual
"critical" papers present in his room at the time of his death. Those
"critical" papers were illegally removed from his room as if Tesla
were an illegal alien (he was a naturalized U.S. citizen, so the entire action
was blatantly illegal). If those "critical" papers are still in
existence, then they are still highly classified and hidden from conventional
scientists. Cheney in her biography on Tesla reports finding the location of
those papers.

The free energy electrical automotive power system
part of Tesla’s work was financed by the same world financier who financed
Adolph Hitler’s rise to power as well as much of the early Communist takeover
of Russia. It is speculated that because of this financial control, Tesla would
not have been allowed to put that car into production by one of the U.S. automotive
companies

Some recent references and patents based in part on
Tesla’s work are as follows:

In the early 1900’s, Dr. T. Henry Moray of Salt
Lake City produced his first device to tap energy from the metafrequency
oscillations of empty space itself. Eventually he produced a free energy device
weighing sixty pounds and producing 50,000 watts of electricity for several
hours. Ironically, although he demonstrated his device repeatedly to scientists
and engineers, he was unable to obtain funding to develop the device into a
useable power station that would furnish electrical power on a mass scale.

In the 1920’s and 1930’s Moray steadily improved
his devices, particularly his detector tube, the only real secret of the device
according to Moray himself. In his book, The Sea of Energy in Which the
Earth Floats, Moray presents documented evidence that he invented the first
transistor-type valve in 1925, far ahead of the officially recognized discovery
of the transistor. In his free energy detector tube Moray apparently used,
inside the tube itself, a variation of this transistor idea — a small rounded
pellet of a mixture of triboluminescent zinc, a semiconductor material, and a
radioactive or fissile material. His patent application (for which a patent has
never been granted) was filed on July 13, 1931, long before the advent of the
Bell Laboratories’ transistor.

In test after test Moray demonstrated his radiant
energy device to electrical engineering professors, congressmen, dignitaries,
and a host of other visitors to his laboratory. Once he even took the device
several miles out in the country, away from all power lines, to prove that he
was not simply tuning in to energy being clandestinely radiated from some other
part of his laboratory. Several times he allowed independent investigators to
completely disassemble his device and reassemble it, then reactivate it
themselves. In all tests, he was successful in demonstrating that the device
could produce energy output without any appreciable energy input. According to
exhaustive documentation, no one was ever able to prove that the device was
fraudulent or that Moray had not accomplished exactly what he claimed.

The records are full of signed statements from
skeptical physicists, electrical engineers, and scientists who came to the
Moray laboratory and left with the complete conviction that Moray had indeed
succeeded in tapping a universal source of energy that could produce free
electrical power.

But in the face of all of this, the U.S. Patent
Office refused to grant Moray a patent, first, because his device used a cold
cathode in the tubes (the patent examiner asserted it was common knowledge that
a heated cathode was necessary to obtain electrons) and, second, because he
failed to identify the source of the energy. All sorts of irrelevant patents
and devices were also presented as being infringed upon or duplicated by
Moray’s work. Each of these objections was patiently answered and nullified by
Moray; nonetheless, the patent has still not been issued to this day, although
the Morays still keep the patent application current.

John Moray, who operates the Research Institute in
Salt Lake City, has been trying to continue his father’s work since the basic
unit was destroyed by a Russian double agent. Dr. Moray himself died in May
1974.

Gabriel Kron and the Negative Resistor

At the time of his death, Gabriel Kron was
considered by some the greatest "non-linear" scientist ever produced
by the United States.

A negative resistor is defined as any component or
function or process that receives energy in unusable or disordered form and
outputs that energy in usable, ordered form, where that is the net
function performed. We specifically do not include "differential"
negative resistors such as the tunnel diode, thyristor, and magnetron which
dissipate and disorder more energy overall than they order in their
"negative resistance" regimes.

It appears that the availability of the Heaviside
energy component surrounding any portion of the circuit may be the long sought
secret to Gabriel Kron’s "open path" that enabled him to produce a
true negative resistor in the 1930s, as the chief scientist for General
Electric on the U.S. Navy contract for the Network Analyzer at Stanford
University. Kron was never permitted to release how he made his negative
resistor, but did state that, when placed in the Network Analyzer, the
generator could be disconnected because the negative resistor would power the
circuit. This negative resistor, one might add, was developed at the expense of
the U.S. Taxpayer.

Since a negative resistor converges surrounding
energy and diverges it into the circuit, it appears that Kron’s negative
resistor gathered energy from the Heaviside component of energy flow as an
"open path" flow of energy — connecting together the local vicinities
of any two separated circuit components — that had been discarded by previous
electrodynamicists following Lorentz. Hence Kron referred to it as the
"open path." Kron describes this as follows: "...the missing
concept of "open-paths" (the dual of "closed-paths") was
discovered, in which currents could be made to flow in branches that lie
between any set of two nodes. (Previously — following Maxwell — engineers tied
all of their open-paths to a single datum point, the ‘ground’). That discovery
of open-paths established a second rectangular transformation matrix... which
created ‘lamellar’ currents..." "A network with the simultaneous
presence of both closed and open paths was the answer to the author’s
years-long search."

A true negative resistor appears to have been
developed by Kron. He described his apparent success in 1945 stating: "When
only positive and negative real numbers exist, it is customary to replace a
positive resistance by an inductance and a negative resistance by a capacitor
(since none or only a few negative resistances exist on practical network
analyzers)." Apparently Kron was required to insert the words
"none or" in that statement. He also wrote that: "Although
negative resistances are available for use with a network analyzer,…"
suggesting in rather certain terms that negative resistors were available for
use on the network analyzer.

University of Moscow Scientists tested Overunity
devices in 1930s

In the 1930s Russian scientists (Mandelstam et al.)
at the University of Moscow and supporting agencies developed and
tested parametric oscillator generators exhibiting COP > 1.0. The theory,
results, pictures, etc. are in both the Russian and French literature, with
many references cited in this particular translation. Apparently the work was
never resurrected after WW II.

The original point-contact transistor often behaved
in true negative resistor fashion, but was never understood. The
point-contact transistor was simply bypassed by advancing to other transistor
types more easily manufactured and with less manufacturing variances.
Point-contact transistors can easily be developed into true negative resistors
enabling COP> 1.0 circuits.

Burford and Verner (p.281) state that: "…the
theory underlying their function is imperfectly understood even after almost a
century… although the very nature of these units limits them to small power
capabilities, the concept of small-signal behavior, in the sense of the term
when applied to junction devices, is meaningless, since there is no region of
operation wherein equilibrium or theoretical performance is observed.
Point-contact devices may therefore be described as sharply nonlinear under all
operating conditions."

A frequency converter using 64 transistor stages
and similar sophisticated feedforward and feedback mechanisms was placed in
the original Minuteman missile, then deliberately modified to stop its
demonstrated COP > 1.0 performance. After much investigation, it was found
that the units were putting out some 105% as much energy as they received. Some
were exhibiting COP = 1.15. Very quietly, Westinghouse engineers then obtained
several patents surrounding the technology, but no further mention of it
appears in the literature although DeSantis et al. showed that feedback systems
with a multipower open loop chain can produce COP > 1.0 performance. Some of
these patents are listed below:

In the original magnetic boots for astronauts
developed by Radus et al. at Westinghouse, the magnetic
fields themselves — from permanent magnets — were simply switched! The
astronaut could pick up his foot by simply switching off the permanent magnetic
fields easily. They switched on again when he placed the foot down. He did not
have to carry a huge battery around with him, to furnish enormous current to do
that. And the magnets had a memory. (So far as is known, even today no one
tells you that in many virgin magnets fresh from the factory, their very first
use conditions them with a memory! That fact can be used, for example, to
create magnets whose fields appear normal, but which deviate from the normal
behavior of ordinary magnets, including produce anomalies in their magnetic
fields.

It can easily be seen that, when one can switch a
permanent magnet’s fields easily, and the magnet also has a built-in memory as
did the Radus magnets, then with a little ingenuity in switching one could use
such switchable magnets to produce a self-switching, self-powered permanent
magnet motor. The magnet, being a permanent dipole, is already a particular
kind of "free energy generator", since it continuously gates magnetic
energy directly from the vacuum due to its asymmetry in the energetic vacuum
flux.

The entire subject of making permanent magnets with
memories, and how to use such in operational systems, is still a largely
unexplored, extremely obscure territory. In fact, most researchers are not even
aware that the phenomenon exists. Some references on this topic are listed
below:

Hangar, A.W. and A. A. Rosener, "The use of
permanent magnets in zero-gravity mobility and restraint "footwear"
concept," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. MAG-6, No. 3, Sept.
1970, p. 464-467. These crude "shuffler" boots are a contrast to the
elegant Westinghouse/Radus "stepping" boots earlier developed and
used by NASA.

Applications by Japanese inventor Teruo Kawai of
adroit self-switching of the magnetic path in magnetic motors results in
approximately doubling the COP. Modification of an ordinary magnetic engine of
COP < 0.5 will not produce COP > 1.0. However, modification of available
high efficiency (COP = 0.6 to 0.8) engines to use the Kawai process does result
in engines exhibiting COP = 1.2 to 1.6. Two Kawai-modified Hitachi engines were
rigorously tested by Hitachi engineers and produced COP = 1.4 and COP = 1.6
respectively. The Kawai process, which can be constructed directly from the
Patent with appropriate switching (e.g. photon), and several other Japanese
overunity systems appear to have been blocked from further development and
marketing.

"The Master Principle of Overunity and the
Japanese Overunity Engines: A New Pearl Harbor?"

The Virtual Times, website http://www.hsv.com,
January 1996.

Johnson’s Motors

Howard Johnson has built many novel linear and
rotary motors and at least one self-powering magnetic rotary device that
was later stolen in a mysterious break-in at his laboratory. Johnson uses a
bidirectional "two particle" theory of magnetic flux lines that can
be justified by Whittaker’s earlier work showing the internal bidirectional
energy flows in all potentials and fields. He also utilizes controlled
spin-waves and self-initiated precise exchange forces, which are known to
momentarily produce bursts of very strong forcefields.

His approach is to use highly nonlinear assemblies
of magnets that initiate the foregoing phenomena at very precise points in the
rotation cycle. In short, he seeks to produce precisely located and directed
sudden magnetic forces, using self-initiated nonlinear magnetic phenomena. This
is analogous to what the Wankel engine did using the Lenz law effect by sharply
interrupting a weak current in an external coil. The Lenz law effect and other
very abrupt field changes momentarily produce not only an amplified Poynting
energy flow component, but also an amplified Heaviside energy flow
component as well. Some relevant references include:

Sweet’s solid state vacuum triode used specially
conditioned barium ferrite magnetics whose H-field was in
self-oscillation. The device produced a COP = 1.2 x 106 (that’s 1.2
million!), outputting some 500 watts for an input of only 33 milliwatts. Sweet
never revealed his complete ELF self-oscillation conditioning procedure for the
magnets. However, in ferromagnets, self-oscillations of (1)
magnetization, (2) spin-waves above spin-wave instability threshold, and (3)
magnons are known at frequencies from about 1 kHz to 1 MHz. Under controlled
conditions, the apparatus also exhibited anti-gravity properties,
producing a weight reduction of 90% in one experiment.

It may be of interest that Kron was a mentor of
Sweet, who was his protégé. Sweet, who is now deceased, worked for the same
company, but not on the Network Analyzer project. However, he almost certainly
knew the secret of Kron’s "open path" discovery and his negative resistor.
For an entry into this technical area with detailed reference citations, see:

Dr. Deborah D. L. Chung, professor of mechanical
and aerospace engineering at University at Buffalo (UB), is the leading
"smart materials" scientist in this country, and a scientist of
international reputation. She holds the Niagara Mohawk Chair in Materials
Research at UB and is internationally recognized for her work in smart
materials and carbon composites. On July 9, 1998 in a keynote address at the
Fifth International Conference on Composites Engineering in Las Vegas, she
reported having observed apparent negative resistance in interfaces between
layers of carbon fibers in a composite material. The negative resistance was
observed in a direction perpendicular to the fiber layers.

Her team tested the negative resistance effect
thoroughly, for a year in the laboratory. There is no question at all about it
being a true negative resistor. Dr. Chung submitted a paper describing the
research to a peer-reviewed journal, and the University filed a patent
application. Several negative articles appeared quickly in the popular
scientific press. Conventional scientists were quickly quoted as proclaiming
that negative resistance was against the laws of physics and thermodynamics.
Others thought perhaps the UB researchers had made a little battery and were
unaware of it.

On the web site for the University of Buffalo, it
was announced that the invention would be offered for commercial licensing. A
Technical Data Package was available for major companies interested in
licensing and signing the proper non-disclosure agreements. Shortly
thereafter this was no longer true, the data package was no longer available,
and there was an indefinite hold on licensing and commercialization. It is
still on hold as of this writing.

Dr. Randell Mills and Blacklight Power

In early 1989, Dr. Randell Mills discovered that
the hydrogen atom could be collapsed below its ground state and give
up significant amounts of energy. At first, it was thought that he had
discovered a new form of cold fusion. However, he showed that his discovery was
indeed a new form of energy from the collapse of the hydrogen atom (which he
calls hydrinos). An early report showed as much as 1,000 times as much
energy out as input energy. This excellent amount of thermal energy was
attributed to the catalytic reactions that provide a receptor for the energy
emitted when the hydrogen collapses. The newsletter Fusion Facts named
Dr. Mills as Scientist of the year for his work.

U.S. Patent 6,024,935 was granted in 2000 to Dr.
Randell Mills and his company, BlackLight Power, Inc. The patent was
unusually large with 60 pages and 499 claims. The patent is for
Lower-Energy Hydrogen Methods and Structure. Information about this new field
is on the Web site http://www.blacklightpower.com/index.html

Cold Fusion

The phenomenon of cold fusion was first reported by
Utah researchers Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischman, and has been
successfully replicated in several hundred experiments in laboratories around
the world in spite of a huge disinformation campaign. The situation with cold
fusion is akin to the early days of aspirin. It works, but "conventional
science" does not know how or why – ergo it is a threat to not only
entrenched economic interests such as the centralized power industry, but also
to the orthodox scientific community.

Nuclear engineer Dr. Thomas Bearden has proposed
several novel reactions, including the formation of time-reversal zones, which
do explain cold fusion’s mechanism. This is the because these novel
experimental anomalies are in fact caused by using time as an energy source by
transducing time-energy into spatial energy. Transducing one microsecond
per second of time into spatial EM energy yields nearly 1011 watts
of power. It can thus be seen that time itself is potentially a huge source of
power, and could well be the energy source of choice for the latter part of
this century.

An apparent variation on cold fusion, the Patterson
Power Cell uses a thin film to achieve the same spectral results, a finding
apparently confirmed by Professor George Miley at the University of Illinois.
According to Dr. Eugene Mallove, a noted scientist and cold fusion analyst,
during a test conducted by Motorola, the giant US electronics manufacturer, on
the Patterson Power Cell. "One cell produced 20 watts continuously with
zero input power. It is under non-disclosure, but I have that raw data and
there is no doubt that in numerous such tests have seen these effects where a
thermal difference of lets say 15 degrees centigrade persisted for eleven hours
in a cell no bigger than my thumb. You had the functional equivalent of a
twenty Watt light bulb heating water."

COP’s of over 1200 have been reported from the
Patterson Power Cell. Patents to James A. Patterson and articles include the
following:

The foregoing examples are but a few of the known
legitimate overunity systems. Lack of space precludes discussion of other
proven systems by pioneers such as Bedini, Watson, Fogal, Nelson, Weigand,
Lawandy, McKie etc.

"On an Expression of the Electromagnetic Field
Due to Electrons by Means of Two Scalar Potential Functions," Proc.
Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. 367-372. The latter paper was
published in 1904 and orally delivered in 1903.

See particularly the paper by Evans et al.
which for the first time deals very deeply with Whittaker’s two cited papers.
M. W. Evans, L. B. Crowell et al., "On the Representation of the
Electromagnetic Field in Terms of Two Whittaker Scalar Potentials," 1999
(in preparation). This is a group paper by 19 members and fellows of the AIAS
(Alpha Foundation Institute for Advanced Study).

Alger, P.L., (Ed.), The Life and Times of
Gabriel Kron, or Walking Around the World, and Tensors, Mohawk
Development Services, Inc., Schenectady, NY, 1969.

Though it will never power anything of substance,
on December 31, 1996 U.S. Patent Number 5,590,031 was awarded to Franklin B.
Mead Jr. and Jack Nachamkin for a system for converting electromagnetic
radiation energy to electrical energy. This is actually a proof of principle
(using the Casimir effect) in that it definitely proves that there are ways to
extract usable EM energy from the vacuum. It only takes one white crow to
prove that not all crows are black! And that is definitely a fine little
white crow.

But the most ubiquitous gate of all for "free
energy" is the simple little source dipole. The dipole becomes a universal
kind of negative resistor extracting EM energy from the vacuum. Specifically it
absorbs energy from the time-domain (complex plane) and emits the energy in
real 3-space. Unfortunately, lack of space precludes further discussion of
this.

There are two magic rules in the scalar
electrogravitational business:

(1) When ordinary EM force fields are interfered or
summed so that they produce vector zero, they produce stress of vacuum
(5-potential). One component of this 5-potential is the 4-space G-potential.
Since bleed-off as a gradient of this 4-space G-potential is all that is
allowed, then the EM destructive interference/zero summation bleeds-off to
produce gravitational force field.

Thus the age-old scientific dream of direct engineering
of gravitational field - and of space-time itself - has now become reality. To
start, one simply makes an EM vector zero and varies its stress intensity and
internal pattern of summed components. One also varies the reference potential
at which the patterned EM stress zero is created, and the frequency of internal
component variation.

Here is the secret of antigravity:

The "electrical charge" of a charged
particle - such as one of the orbital electrons of an atom or one of the
protons of its nucleus - represents a difference in flux intensity
(potential) between the local particle and its ambient vacuum.

It’s the continual bleed-off of gravitational
charge as electrical charge.

If that bleed-off is reversed or stopped, a drastic
effect on the gravitational potential and charge ensues. The 5-potential and
5-charge have become 4-G-potential and 4-d-charge respectively.

Thus "charging" an object with its scalar
EM pattern charges it gravitationally.

Now the only "bleed-off channel" is
through the 4-G force field.

Further, in a nucleus, the nucleons continually
change back and forth between proton and neutron, so the electrical charge is
"spread" throughout the nucleus and shared by all the nucleons.

Further, each element (actually each isotope) has
its own unique "ensemble pattern" of Fourier expansion scalar
frequencies, amplitudes, etc. This pattern, of course, can be reproduced
artificially and transmitted by modified EM transmitters (i.e., by scalar EM
transmitters). There is, however, a sort of "master key" scalar EM
(EG) pattern for nucleons (protons and neutrons which are changing back and
forth into each other by exchange of virtual charge currents).

If one "reverses the charge" by inverting
this pattern, and then "charges up a mass with the inverted charge,"
to the external observer the charging mass just gets lighter and lighter, and
its inertia gets less and less. Eventually it seems (to him) to acquire
negative mass and negative inertia, and just accelerate away from the Earth.
The object "falls upward" instead of "falling downwards."

There are also some weird time effects; that object
can be moving slower through time than the laboratory observer, or even be moving
backwards through time with respect to the laboratory observer. (Don’t
believe everything they taught you in relativity; few of those involved had
ever engineered a single general relativistic situation. Nothing they teach in
GR is based on direct experiment. Most of what they teach is already experimentally
proven to be in error.).

Inside the pattern itself, it’s just a quite normal
pattern. No change in or on the object seems to have occurred, to it, if the
charge is evenly accomplished throughout the object. Indeed, to an internal
observer it’s the external environment that seems to have suddenly
gotten very strange!

For example it appears that this is what
occasionally happens to a hapless aircraft or ship that experiences anomalous
spatiotemporal difficulty in an occasionally scalar-active area such as the
infamous Bermuda triangle. Under the right conditions, the vehicle’s
gravitational charge is affected by anomalous changes in the scalar radiation
from the Earth in that area. To the passengers and crew, it is the external
environment that suddenly seems weird. In addition, on-board EM and inertial
instruments may be affected, and other electrogravitational effects may also
occur, due to differing rates of charge in different parts of the vehicle.).

"Reversing or lowering the EG-charge" is
controlled by means of biasing the ground potential on the ensemble
pattern transmitters. These transmitters can even be on-board the vehicle
itself because, in scalar EM, to transmit is also to receive. A vehicle can
change its own bias potential (with respect to local vacuum G-potential) by
properly transmitting, which translates to "receiving potential
charge." The charge current can either be negative or positive (its
potential can be lowered or increased vis-a-vis that of the vacuum.)

By fiddling with this, you can float metal. Or a
human body. Or a battleship. Or a high-speed vehicle containing a crew.

You can even "dematerialize it" or
"teleport it."

In the "Philadelphia Experiment" in the 1940s,
the test ship, the minesweeper IX97 (originally the yacht "Martha’s
Vineyard") and its personnel were "blasted" into this strange
realm, instead of making a gentle, controlled entry. Nicola Tesla, virtually on
his deathbed, had instructed the scientific team involved how to do this. (See
Bob Beckwith’s book "Hypotheses" – Beckwith was a GE scientist on the
team). The results of this experiment, which produced inadvertent time travel
from the experimental ship’s location to another location and back and produced
horrendous results (crew members were fused through the deck etc.), are slated
for de-classification in 2002, according to private sources.

Suppose one materially lowers or reverses (adjusts)
the gravitational charge (gravitation 5-potential with zero-summed EM to
throttle EM bleed-off). At zero gravitational charge, to the external observer,
the vehicle seems to have no mass and no inertia. It is capable of
extreme accelerations, right angle turns at full speed, etc. It is also right
on the point of dematerialization, and appears to be a vehicle of light.

If the pilot wishes to "land," of course
he must adjust the charge on the vehicle.

If the pilot wishes to "dematerialize" or
"teleport," again he must adjust the charge on the vehicle.

If he wishes to go "hyperspatial," again
he must adjust the charge on the vehicle and allow the proper bleed-off to
produce a hyperspatial force. That is done with nested zero summations and
nested patterns of scalar EM transmission.

That is, he can charge and bias the vehicle in
multiple, nested zero-summations simultaneously.

That is necessary for hyperspatial control and
travel.

Note that in lower hyperspace the vehicle can do
some very strange things. Such as "penetrate" solid matter (actually,
it goes "around" the 3-space matter in a 4th Kaluza-Klein space).

One would expect to see such vehicles glowing.
Their various surface features and mechanisms might also appear to be glowing
or revolving lights, etc.

They could exhibit incredible "aerodynamic
performance," seemingly in the atmosphere.

Actually they would not be moving
"through" the atmosphere at all, but through a higher space outside
each particle of atmosphere.

They could seem to materialize and dematerialize.

They could seem to plunge into the ocean or rise
out of it.

They could even seem to operate under the
ocean or inside the Earth itself.

Such anomalous vehicle performances have been seen
all over the world, particularly since a few years after WWII.

The U.S. government, the Soviet Union (and probably
other nations of Earth) are operating such vehicles now in great secrecy
(as are our ET visitors).

This however isn’t our true
"government/government." Instead, it’s the "control
group/government." It’s government at the operational level, but at higher
level it belongs to certain control groups whohave penetrated our
government’s vitals and taken over all such projects.

Electrogravitation seems to have been started time
and time again in the U.S. government. Each time, it seems to have either been
violently squelched or subverted to mysterious control by sources inside
the government that are not actually government.

In any such "subverted" project, the
individuals involved in the operations are truly government employees
who fully believe their highly classified project is controlled by the U.S.
government. They think the higher government officials with need-to-know are
fully cognizant of the project.

Actually that assumption will be false. At the top
of the project, the project does not report to the U.S. government. It
reports to control group representatives. Utmost secrecy classification
is used as a cloak to disguise the project even from higher U.S. government
officials who are in the direct chain and possess the appropriate certified
clearances and need-to-know.

Thus one has to be careful when he asks,
"Doesn’t our own government have such things?" The answer is both yes
and no.

Our legitimate government/government is not
allowed to have these vehicles, or know of them.

Our illegitimate control group/government has had
them for some decades.

In the mid 1920’s Townsend Brown discovered that
electric charge and gravitational mass are coupled. He
found that when he charged a capacitor to a high voltage, it had a tendency to
move toward its positive pole. This became known as the Biefeld-Brown effect.
His important findings were opposed by conventional minded physicists of his
time.

The Pearl Harbor Demonstration. Around 1953, Brown
conducted a demonstration for top brass from the military. He flew a pair of
3-foot diameter discs around a 50-foot course tethered to a central pole.
Energized with 150,000 volts and emitting ions from their leading edge, they
attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The subject was thereafter
classified.

Project Winterhaven. Brown submitted a proposal to
the Pentagon for the development of a Mach 3 disc shaped electrogravitic
fighter craft. Drawings of its basic design are shown in one of his patents.
They are essentially large-scale versions of his tethered test discs.

Aviation Studies International. They are a think
tank that produces intelligence studies for the military. In 1956 they issued a
report entitled "Electrogravitics Systems" which called for major
government funding to develop Townsend Brown’s electrogravitics technology and
make Project Winterhaven a reality. The report stated that most of the
aerospace was actively researching this antigravity technology. It named
companies such as: Glenn-Martin, Convair, Sperry-Rand, Bell, Sikorsky, Douglas,
and Hiller. Other companies who entered the field included Lockheed and Hughes
Aircraft, the latter being regarded by some as the world leader in the field.
This report was initially classified. Dr. Paul LaViolette accidentally
discovered it in 1985 when he found it listed in the Library of Congress card
catalog, but the document was missing from their collection. Their staff
made a computer search and found that the only other known copy was located at
Wright Patterson Air Force Base. LaViolette later obtained it from Wright
Patterson through interlibrary loan. It is now published in the book Electrogravitics
Systems, T. Valone (editor)."

Northrop’s Wind Tunnel Tests. In 1968, engineers at
the Northrop Corp. performed wind tunnel tests in which they charged the
leading edge of a wing to a high voltage. They were investigating how this
technique could be used beneficially to soften the sonic boom of aircraft.
Hence they were performing large-scale tests on Brown’s electrogravitic
concept. Brown’s R&D company had previously made known that sonic boom
softening would be a beneficial side effect of this electrogravitic propulsion
technique. Interestingly, Northrop later became the prime contractor for the
B-2 bomber.

The B-2 Bomber. In 1992, black project scientists
disclosed to Aviation Week and Space Technology magazine that the B-2
electrostatically charges its exhaust to a high voltage and also charges the
leading edge of its wing-like body to the opposite polarity. This information
led Dr. LaViolette in 1993 to reverse engineer the B-2’s propulsion system. He
proposed that the B-2 is essentially a realization of Townsend Brown’s patented
electrogravitic aircraft. The B-2 is capable of taking off under normal jet
propulsion. But when airborne, its electrogravitic drive may be switched on for
added thrust. This system can only be turned on under dry conditions. If the
B-2’s dielectric wing were to become wet, the applied high voltage charge would
short out, which explains why the B-2 is unable to fly in the rain.
Brown’s electrogravitic experiments and a field theory that LaViolette had
developed (1985, 1994a) both suggest that the B-2’s high voltage space charge
differential sets up a gravity gradient from fore to aft that assists the
craft’s forward movement. LaViolette’s theory suggests that the aftward
movement of charges around the B-2 may contribute an even larger
gravitational thrust effect, an effect also seen in Brown’s electrokinetic
experiments.

With electrogravitic drive, the B-2 is able to
drastically cut its fuel consumption, possibly even to zero under high-speed
flight conditions. The commercial airline industry could dramatically
benefit with this technology, which would not only substantially increase the
miles per gallon fuel efficiency of jet airliners, but would also permit
high-speed flight that would dramatically cut flight time.

The movement of the charges may contribute an even
larger thrust effect. The same would apply to the B-2 bomber.

Sid Hurwich

In 1969, Toronto inventor Sid Hurwich demonstrated
his gravitational field manipulation device to the Toronto police.
Inspector Bill Dolton, the Chief of the Holdup Squad, contributed his service
revolver for the demonstration. The revolver was then frozen onto the table,
and he was unable to lift the pistol or pull the trigger. After a half hour or
so in the room for the experiment, clocks and watches had not changed their
time from the time of entry, showing a strong space-time curvature.

The device was subsequently used in the Israeli’s
raid on Entebbe, Uganda on July 3rd, 1976 and later described in the
Vancouver Sun Times’ Weekend Magazine December 17th, 1977, p.17.
"Israel’s Secret Weapon."

In several fascinating papers published in the year
2000, Brazilian Physics Professor Fran De Aquino shows that by
manipulation of the gravitational field he was able to: extract energy directly
from the gravitational field, and levitate a 77 lb. toroidal object two feet in
diameter using extra-low frequency radiation. Professor De Aquino is a
Professor in the Physics Department at Maranhao State University, S. Luis/MA,
Brazil. Professor De Aquino advises that the papers were peer reviewed by 36
scientists, up to and including a Nobel laureate.

The Searl Electrogravity Disc and Russian
Experiments. This device, developed over 40 years ago by the British engineer
John Searl, consisted of a segmented rotating disc each of whose segments was
supported by a set of cylindrical permanent magnets rolling within a
circumferential track. It is alleged to have achieved complete lift off. In the
past few years two Russian scientists associated with the Russian National
Academy of Sciences, Roschin and Godin, have built a simplified
version of the Searl Disc that confirms its anomalous weight loss effects. They
spun a 1 m diameter disc at 600 rpm and obtained a 35% reduction in its weight
while at the same time generating a 7 kilowatt excess electric power output.

The Podkletnov Gravity Shield and Project
Greenglow. A research team in Finland led by Dr. Podkletnov was experimenting
with a rotating superconducting disc that was floated on a repelling magnetic
field generated by a series of electromagnets. In 1996, they reported that the
disc was able to partially screen the Earth’s gravitational field, reducing the
weight of objects positioned above the disc by two percent. Greater weight
reductions are envisioned by stacking several discs over one another. Besides
propulsion, there are obvious applications to tapping the resulting gravity
differential for mechanical power generation. In the last few years, BAE
Systems a company formed by the merger of British Aerospace with Marconi
Electronic Systems, has been researching the Podkletnov gravity shield. They
are doing this work under Project Greenglow, a project they have set up to
investigate the feasibility of nonconventional technologies.

Gravito Inertial Lift System. Aerospace engineer Jim
Cox has recently improved on the Dean Drive, an inertial propulsion engine
that was patented in May 1959. He reports tests demonstrating an upward thrust
equal to 90% of the engine’s weight. It uses a 1/4 horsepower motor to revolve
two counter-rotating rotors, each about 1 cm in diameter, spinning them at
about 600 rpm for a power consumption of about 200 watts. The lift is gotten by
sinusoidally oscillating the rotors up and down and coupling them to the lift
platform on their upward stroke. He obtains about 45 pounds of lift force per
horsepower (~55 pounds/kW). He plans by the end of the year to have a freely
lifting device that would be spun to 1200 rpm with a 1/2 horsepower motor
drawing 400 watts. He estimates that using this technology a 200 horsepower
automobile engine would be capable of generating a lift force of about 9000
pounds.

Kineto-baric Field Propulsion. German scientist Rudolph
Zinsser discovered that sawtooth electromagnetic waves could be made to
push distant objects. He produced a radio tube circuit that transmitted 45
megahertz radio waves having a sharp rise and gradual fall. His experiments
demonstrated that these waves could exert impulses of up to 104 to
105 dyne seconds, which is equivalent to the application of about 1
to 3 ounces of force for a period of one second. He found that this force could
be generated with an amazingly low input power, the output-force-to-input-power
ratio surpassing that of conventional propulsion methods by several powers of
ten. His projections imply a thrust of 1350 pounds force per kilowatt.

Field Thrust Experiments on Piezoelectrics. James
Woodward, a physics professor at Cal State Fullerton, is conducting
research that indicates that electromagnetic waves can induce lifting forces in
piezoelectric ceramic media. His ideas are described in a 1994 U.S. patent and
in a 1990 physics journal article. Woodward has conducted experiments that
confirm this thrust effect in the audio frequency range (~10,000 Hertz), and
his calculations suggest that it may be substantially increased at higher
frequencies, with optimal performance being obtained in the microwave range
(0.1 to 10 gigahertz). His work has received some support from Department of
Energy.

Thanks to Dr. Paul LaViolette for permission to
cite the summary of antigravity research he had presented to U.S. Senate staff
(October 2000), and thanks to the many other anonymous sources.

The summaries of two recent reports are included
here as examples of serious thoughtful studies of the UFO phenomena. The
first is the Sturrock/Rockefeller Report done in the United States and
published in 1998. The second is the COMETA report done in France and published
in 1999.

In 1997, a workshop was organized by Dr. Peter
Sturrock and the Society of Scientific Exploration and funded by Mr. Laurance S. Rockefeller
to review physical evidence purported to be associated with UFO events. This
was the first major review of these issues by the scientific community in
nearly 3 decades and the results were reported in the national media. The
abstract of the workshop proceedings (which was published in the Journal of
Scientific Exploration) is reprinted below. This is followed by the Stanford
University News Service Press release about the workshop proceedings. The
full report of the proceedings is available from the Journal of Scientific Exploration
and was later expanded in a book by Dr. Peter Sturrock in 1999.

Abstract:

Physical Evidence Related to UFO Reports:
The Proceedings of a Workshop Held at the Pocantico Conference center,
Tarrytown, New York, September 29 – October 4, 1997

The purpose of this four-day workshop was to review
purported physical evidence associated with UFO reports, with a view to
assessing whether the further acquisition and investigation of such evidence is
likely to help solve the UFO problem, namely the determination of the cause or
causes of these reports.

Seven UFO investigators presented a variety of
physical evidence that they claimed was associated with UFO reports:
photographic evidence; luminosity estimates; radar evidence; interference with
automobile functioning; interference with aircraft equipment; apparent
gravitational or inertial effects; ground traces; injuries to vegetation;
physiological effects on witnesses; and analysis of debris. There was in
addition a presentation of investigations into recurrent phenomena that occur
in the Hessdalen Valley in Norway.

A review panel was composed of nine scientists of
diverse expertise and interests. The panel offered comments and criticisms
concerning the investigations that were presented, and also prepared a summary
of their overall response, with the following key elements:

oConcerning the case material presented by the
investigators, the panel concluded that a few reported incidents may have
involved rare but significant phenomena such as electrical activity, but there
was no convincing evidence pointing to unknown physical processes or to the
involvement of extraterrestrial intelligence.

oThe panel nevertheless concluded that it would be
valuable to carefully evaluate UFO reports since, whenever there are
unexplained observations, there is the possibility that scientists will learn
something new by studying these observations. However, to be credible, such
evaluations must take place with a spirit of objectivity and a willingness to
evaluate rival hypotheses.

oThe best prospect for achieving a meaningful
evaluation of relevant hypotheses is likely to come from the examination of
physical evidence.

oThe chances of a significant advance are considered
to be greater now than at the time of the Colorado Project that led to the
Condon Report thirty years ago, because of advances in scientific knowledge and
technical capabilities, and in view of the example of a modest but effective
UFO research project provided by the French space agency CNES.

In the first independent review of UFO phenomena
since 1970, a panel of scientists has concluded that some sightings are
accompanied by physical evidence that deserves scientific study. But the panel
was not convinced that any of this evidence points to a violation of known
natural laws or the involvement of an extraterrestrial intelligence.

The review was organized and directed by Peter
Sturrock, professor of applied physics at Stanford University, and supported
administratively by the Society for Scientific Exploration, which provides a
forum for research into unexplained phenomena. The international review panel
of nine physical scientists responded to presentations by eight investigators
of UFO reports, who were asked to present their strongest data. Von R.
Eshleman, professor emeritus of electrical engineering at Stanford, co-chaired
the panel.

Although UFO reports date back 50 years, the
information gathered does not prove that either unknown physical processes or
alien technologies are implicated. But it does include a sufficient number of
intriguing and inexplicable observations, the panel concluded. "It may be
valuable to carefully evaluate UFO reports to extract information about unusual
phenomena currently unknown to science." To be credible to the scientific
community "such evaluations must take place with a spirit of objectivity
and a willingness to evaluate rival hypotheses" that has so far been
lacking, it added.

This conclusion differs from that reached by Dr.
Edward U. Condon, director of the Colorado Project, in his 1968 UFO report. He
concluded that "further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be
justified in the expectation that science will be advanced thereby." It is
very similar, however, to the conclusion reached by the American Institute of
Aeronautics and Astronautics’ Kuettner Report issued two years later, which
advocated "a continuing, moderate-level [research] effort with emphasis on
improved data collection by objective means and on high-quality scientific
analysis."

In the current study, the scientific panel focused
on incidents involving some form of physical evidence, including photographic
evidence, radar evidence, vehicle interference, interference with aircraft
equipment, apparent gravitational or inertial effects, ground traces, injuries
to vegetation, physiological effects on witnesses, and debris. Of particular
concern are reports that UFO encounters may be hazardous to people’s health.
Some witnesses have reportedly suffered radiation-type injuries. These reports
led the panel to draw the attention of the medical community to the possible
health risks involved.

The scientists found that some of the reported
incidents may have been caused by rare natural phenomena, such as electrical
activity high above thunderstorms or radar ducting (the trapping and conducting
of radar waves by atmospheric channels). However, the panel found that some of
the phenomena related to UFOs are not easy to explain in this fashion.

Further analysis of the evidence presented to the
panel is unlikely to shed added light on the causes underlying the reports, the
scientists said. Most current UFO investigations lack the level of rigor
required by the scientific community, despite the initiative and dedication of
the investigators involved. But new data, scientifically acquired and analyzed,
could yield useful information and advance our understanding of the UFO
problem, the panel said.

The reviewers also made the following observations:

oThe UFO problem is not a simple one, and it is
unlikely that there is any simple, universal answer.

oWhenever there are unexplained observations, there
is the possibility that scientists will learn something new by studying them.

oStudies should concentrate on cases that include as
much independent physical evidence as possible.

oContinuing contact between the UFO community and
physical scientists could be productive.

oInstitutional support for research in this area is
desirable.

The review panel consisted of Von Eshleman; Thomas
Holzer, High Altitude Observatory in Boulder, Colo.; Randy Jokipii, professor
of planetary science, University of Arizona, Tucson; Francois Louange, managing
director of Fleximage, Paris, France; H. J. Melosh, professor of planetary
science, University of Arizona, Tucson; James J. Papike, professor of Earth and
planetary sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque; Guenther Reitz,
German Aerospace Center, Institute for Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany;
Charles Tolbert, professor of astronomy, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville; and Bernard Veyret, Bioelectromagnetics Laboratory, University
of Bordeaux, France. Eshleman and Holzer served as co-chairs of the panel.

We provide a live
link to your original material on your site - which raises your ranking on
search engines and helps spread your info further! This site
is published under Creative Commons Fair Use Copyright (unless an individual article
or other item is declared otherwise by copyright holder) – reproduction for non-profit
use is permitted & encouraged, if you give attribution to the work &
author - and please include a (preferably active) link to the original (along
with this or a similar notice).

Feel free to make non-commercial hard
(printed) or software copies or mirror sites - you never know how long
something will stay glued to the web – but remember attribution! If you like
what you see, please send a donation (no amount is too small or too large) or
leave a comment – and thanks for reading this far…

Follow New Illuminati on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE to the NEW ILLUMINATI YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Contact Us

Welcome to the new Enlightenment, an era when suppressed science, hidden history and the enlightening nature of reality are all revealed to those with eyes to see and ears to hear.

These are the thoughts and ideas of New Illuminati - bold forerunners and pioneers of new awareness all over the globe.

Notes on new emerging paradigms from the NEXUS New Times Magazine Founder R. Ayana, who lives in a remote Australian rainforest (and is no longer involved with the magazine) - Catching drops from the deluge in a paper cup since 1984.

§ 107.Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

This material is published under Creative Commons Copyright – reproduction for non-profit use is OK. Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.

Claimer

All opinions, facts, debates and conjectures xpressed herein are xtrusions of macrocosmic consciousness into your field of awareness. The New Illuminati are not to be held responsible or accountable for flashes of insight, epiphany, curiosity, transformation or enlightenment experienced by any person, human or otherwise.