> (It's probably "bar@" that's the correct desination name in this case.)

Em... is it?
I thought, " svn cares only about the last at sign in the argument, and it is not considered
illegal to omit a literal peg revision specifier after that at sign. "
( http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.pegrevs.html )
means that only "@" in "svn copy foo bar@" is considered as an "at-sign for revision".
Received on 2013-07-10 03:23:31 CEST