The Anglobitch Thesis contends that the brand of feminism that arose in the Anglosphere (the English-speaking world) in the 1960s has an ulterior misandrist (anti-male) agenda quite distinct from its self-proclaimed role as ‘liberator’ of women.

Tuesday, 27 May 2014

According to Karl Marx, the broad masses in capitalist societies are
coerced by what he termed ‘false consciousness’. In this view, the exploited
and disenfranchised internalize the world-view of the dominant class, even
where this works to their detriment. Hence, the blue collar masses in North America
often vote Republican, even though this results in reduced life-chances for
people in their socio-economic bracket. Similarly,
the British underclasses are often fanatical defenders of the social order,
despite being firmly fixed at the bottom of it. Neo-Marxists such as Antonio
Gramsci claimed that the complex mass media in Western societies are largely
responsible for maintaining ‘false consciousness’ among the masses.

False consciousness: Mass Hypnosis at work

Some researchers have questioned whether false consciousness really
exists. A British sociologist named Blackburn interviewed numerous factory
workers in the north of England. All of them knew perfectly well that they were
exploited by the factory owners, revealing no signs of Marx’s ‘false
consciousness’.

However, I believe false consciousness is alive and well. It has just
transformed into something else in the post-Marriage era: namely, sexual false consciousness. While
disenfranchised men have a relatively clear grasp of their economic situation, they now
suffer from sexual self-delusion. And this is a logical progression, in that
status in western countries is now expressed sexually rather than economically.
This change has shifted the locus of false consciousness from the economic to the
sexual sphere, since the sexual sphere is now more important. Indeed, as the
British writer Colin Wilson avers, the sexually disenfranchised are the new
underclass, whatever their economic situation. Hence, an incel doctor has lower status than a tattooed thug in a
housing project, if the thug is enjoying a surfeit of sex.

As we all know, the Anglo-American world is a dating nightmare for men.
More than half of all American women are obese; most women over 35 are ‘past
it’ from a sexual stand-point; and the few attractive women are entitled,
unpleasant and only interested in thugs on Death Row. Men who want sex with the
few eligible females have to work hard at it: study Game, hit the gym, eat
right – and as the guys at PUA Hate argue, even all that effort guarantees
nothing. So, aside from fucking whores and pursuing foreign women, the sexual
options for the average Anglo-American male are, basically, dire. For a start,
there are too few eligible women. And the eligible women that do exist generally
hate men who aren’t ‘exciting’ (i.e. tattooed, psychopathic thugs or wealthy
celebrities).

Despite this gritty reality, most Anglo-American men seem to live in a
world of endless sexual bounty, having sex with teenage models every few days (at least according to themselves).
Even old, ugly men with menial jobs claim to be doing this, in the face of all
rational evidence.

Lower class men and their imaginary sex lives

That is sexual false consciousness, in a nutshell:
rampant self-deceit about one’s sexual chances, options and achievements. Men
suffering from this malady are fairly ubiquitous in the Anglosphere. They are particularly common among the lower
social strata, especially the type hitched to obnoxious land whales. If we
examine their claims objectively, they have to be bullshit: otherwise, the
Anglosphere’s tiny minority of beautiful women would be having sex with
thousands of men every day.

False consciousness has a purpose. It deludes the
masses into thinking they are living in mansions, not hovels; that they are
driving Maseratis, not Volkswagens. Similarly, sexual false consciousness
deludes men married to past-prime blimps that they are having sex with 18 year
old models; or it deludes hardcore incels that such escapades are a serious
possibility. And so such men stumble on through lives devoid of all sexual
prospect, keeping corporate capitalism ticking over as workers
and consumers.

Elliot Rodger: Sanest of All?

The recent case of Elliot Rodger shows what happens
when sexual false consciousness breaks down, or fails to form in the first
place. Instead of padding his mind with ludicrous pipe-dreams, Rodger
confronted his incel status every hour of every day. Rather than being ‘crazy’
or ‘insane’, he was, in fact, entirely grounded and objective: far more sane,
in fact, than men trapped in sexual false consciousness.

Rodgers’ only insanity involved his acceptance of
Anglo-American Puritanism as the limits of his psycho-sexual world. With his
money, he could easily have hired a bevy of silicon-enhanced hookers for sexualrelief. Better still, he might have just journeyed to a foreign country where
women are thinner, prettier, less entitled and frankly, less racist.