Ben Henshaw, “Do You Really Want to Claim John Calvin as Your Homeboy?”

April 19, 2017, posted by SEA

A few days ago I saw someone wearing a “Calvin is my homeboy” T-shirt. I have to admit that the shirt made me cringe. My thoughts immediately went to questions concerning Calvin’s character. While I believe that John Calvin did contribute some solid exegesis in his works, I must admit that I feel uneasy about him as a person. There is no question that John Calvin thought it was a good thing to persecute and even execute heretics. There is no question that John Calvin was instrumental in carrying out such persecutions and executions.

Personally, I find the “man of his times” argument to be very weak. I don’t think God judges us by our times, but rather judges us according to His word. The New Testament and the teachings of Jesus simply give no sanctions for the persecution and execution of those who reject Christianity or deviate from certain Christian positions of orthodoxy. Jesus and the New Testament are in harmony that we should be willing, instead, to give our lives for the truth of the gospel (if necessary) when the surrounding culture and government is in opposition to basic Christian principles. This John Calvin did not do, and I simply cannot condone nor respect his involvement in persecuting and executing heretics. There is simply no legitimate defense for such actions.

What I find particularly damning are Calvin’s comments long after the execution of Michael Servetus. These comments are impossible to square with the common defense that Calvin tried so hard to save Servetus, and was apparently against (or largely uninvolved in) the consensus to have him killed (the best that can be argued is that Calvin wanted him beheaded rather than burned, though it has been pointed out that this may well have been primarily for political reasons, rather than a desire to be merciful). Nine years later John Calvin wrote these chilling words,

Servetus suffered the penalty due to his heresies, but was it by my will? Certainly his arrogance destroyed him not less than his impiety. And what crime was it of mine if our Council, at my exhortation, indeed, but in conformity with the opinion of several Churches, took vengeance on his execrable blasphemies? Let Baudouin abuse me as long as he will, provided that, by the judgment of Melanchthon, posterity owes me a debt of gratitude for having purged the Church of so pernicious a monster. (Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Vol. VIII, pp. 690, 691)

Schaff later writes,

Calvin’s work against Servetus gave complete satisfaction to Melanchthon. It is the strongest refutation of the errors of his opponent which his age produced, but it is not free from bitterness against one, at last, had humbly asked his pardon, and who had been sent to the judgment seat of God by a violent death. It is impossible to read without pain the following passage: ‘Whoever shall now contend that is unjust to put heretics and blasphemers to death will knowingly and willingly incur their very guilt. This is not laid down on human authority; it is God who speaks and prescribes a perpetual rule for his Church. (ibid. 791)

This is incontrovertible evidence that John Calvin was unrepentant of the murder of Servetus even nine years after his death. Rather, Calvin actually felt that posterity owed him a debt of gratitude for purging the church of “so pernicious a monster”! Do we really want to venerate such a man, even if we agree with his theology? Have we stopped to consider that according to John Calvin, it is a God ordained and perpetual rule for the Church to persecute and execute heretics and that any who might disagree should themselves be put to death! Do we really want to wear a shirt that says “Calvin is my homeboy” in light of such disturbing truths concerning his character and beliefs?

I do not believe that the proper way to falsify Calvinism is to point to such sinful behavior on the part of John Calvin, but I am coming to agree more and more with Roger Olson who wrote,

However, I do not admire or respect John Calvin. I have been told that he should not be held responsible for the burning of the heretic Servetus because, after all, he warned the Spanish doctor and theologian not to come to Geneva and he urged the city council to behead him rather than burn him. And, after all, Calvin was a child of his times and everyone was doing the same. Nevertheless, I still struggle with placing a man complicit in murder on a pedestal. [link]

So to those of you proudly sporting a “Calvin is my homeboy” shirt, I ask,

About the SEA

The Society of Evangelical Arminians (SEA) is an association of evangelical scholars and laymen who adhere to Arminian theology and are united in order to glorify God, edify his people, protect them from error, and foster the proper representation of our magnificent God...Read more