Read somewhere about the Browns talking about a trade with the Rams, for the Rams to get back to #4 to take Blackmon, you know, so the Browns can make it possible for 2 years in a row for someone ELSE to get a stud at WR...

Read somewhere about the Browns talking about a trade with the Rams, for the Rams to get back to #4 to take Blackmon, you know, so the Browns can make it possible for 2 years in a row for someone ELSE to get a stud at WR...

SD:

Actually perfect scenario for mitigating the reach pick of Tanney offset by a DC #2 this year or preferably a #1 next year .

The Browns got nothing , they can't even sell hope if they foolishly trot out that Dog squat Mccoy as the answer , season ticket sales are in the toilet .

They can pick Richardson at 6 after Miami trades up for Fannyhill , and then choose 137 year old weeden who they want but can hardly justify picking so early due to him being eligible for social security.

The Browns will have to rely on being lucky than good , because their F u C ked in this draft due to their own incompetence.

trsteve1 wrote:Read somewhere about the Browns talking about a trade with the Rams, for the Rams to get back to #4 to take Blackmon, you know, so the Browns can make it possible for 2 years in a row for someone ELSE to get a stud at WR...

Meh. IMHO, any of the WR's that might be available at 22 have as much stud potential as Blackmon. There's just not enough separation between Blackmon and the other 1st round guys for me to get upset.

SoulDawg74 wrote:Ever heard of a kid named Waters played for the 49ers who was that size or that scatback who starred in Philly for a decade and was 60% of their offense.

SoulDawg

I've heard of a Ricky Watters who was 6'1" 210 but not this Ricky Watters scat back of which you speak.

Your correct shows the difference in eras , he was a feature back then at that size , but would be considered a scatback now at that size even if he played the role of feature back .

210 is a scatback?

Just say uncle and move on.

If it makes ya happy

Emmitt was 220

jacobs is 260

Hillis is 250

AP is 225

Gore is 230

The Atlanta feature back has to go a duece and a half

Harrison weighed more than 205 and you could slap him down with a wave .

Waters had shake and bake and he was used in the Westbrook type mode which was my point ,, James is not as big as either but faster than any other examples a true scat back which I doubt could be a feature back .

But whatever your moody ass wants to argue over just take your midol and go to the next one ,,

SoulDawg74 wrote:Ever heard of a kid named Waters played for the 49ers who was that size or that scatback who starred in Philly for a decade and was 60% of their offense.

SoulDawg

I've heard of a Ricky Watters who was 6'1" 210 but not this Ricky Watters scat back of which you speak.

Your correct shows the difference in eras , he was a feature back then at that size , but would be considered a scatback now at that size even if he played the role of feature back .

210 is a scatback?

Just say uncle and move on.

If it makes ya happy

Emmitt was 220

jacobs is 260

Hillis is 250

AP is 225

Gore is 230

The Atlanta feature back has to go a duece and a half

Harrison weighed more than 205 and you could slap him down with a wave .

Waters had shake and bake and he was used in the Westbrook type mode which was my point ,, James is not as big as either but faster than any other examples a true scat back which I doubt could be a feature back .

But whatever your moody ass wants to argue over just take your midol and go to the next one ,,

SoulDawg74 wrote:Ever heard of a kid named Waters played for the 49ers who was that size or that scatback who starred in Philly for a decade and was 60% of their offense.

SoulDawg

I've heard of a Ricky Watters who was 6'1" 210 but not this Ricky Watters scat back of which you speak.

Your correct shows the difference in eras , he was a feature back then at that size , but would be considered a scatback now at that size even if he played the role of feature back .

210 is a scatback?

Just say uncle and move on.

If it makes ya happy

Emmitt was 220

jacobs is 260

Hillis is 250

AP is 225

Gore is 230

The Atlanta feature back has to go a duece and a half

Harrison weighed more than 205 and you could slap him down with a wave .

Waters had shake and bake and he was used in the Westbrook type mode which was my point ,, James is not as big as either but faster than any other examples a true scat back which I doubt could be a feature back .

But whatever your moody ass wants to argue over just take your midol and go to the next one ,,