I've been thinking a little bit about a deck of cards---------------------------

ASS of Spades- George and Barbra Bush- they birthed and corrupted Jr.
FIVE CENTS
Kinks of Spades - George Bush Jr. He honestly believes he's Royalty.
FOUR CENTS
Queer of Spades - Contra Sleeza Rice - She spreads Bush Sr., Cheney's,
Clinton's and Jr's propoganda.
THREE CENTS
Jack (Joker ) of Spades- Cheney is the puppeteer that pulls Jr.s strings.
TWO CENTS
Ten-Nine-Eight-Seven-Six-Five-Four-Three-Two of Spades- Everyone ln
Jr's cabinet
One Cent for each of them -
This also includes FauxNews- Rupert Murdock- Disney Family-
CNN-ABC-NBC and other news scource that refuses to
broadcast truth to the public.
If every brain of every member on FOX news was transplanted into the brain of one Donkey - he would still be an ignorant jackass.

_________________"If the people allow private banks to control their currency the banks and corporations will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson

_________________"If the people allow private banks to control their currency the banks and corporations will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson

Sports analogies can hit and miss in politics. Here's one I hope makes sense:

A worst thing a team can do, is take what looks like a good lead, and start to sluff off. I think Obama supporters should not sluff off.

They should play the presidential race game, like they are in a close one "down to the wire". Pressure has to be continually applied on all fronts. Attacks on the McCain plan. Attacks on the myopic Palin plan. Voter registration and drives to make sure the polls are packed with Obama supporters.

The term Bradley effect, less commonly called the Wilder effect, refers to a frequently observed discrepancy between voter opinion polls and election outcomes in American political campaigns when a white candidate and a non-white candidate run against each other. Named for Tom Bradley, an African-American who lost the 1982 California governor's race despite being ahead in voter polls, the Bradley effect refers to a tendency on the part of white voters to tell pollsters that they are undecided or likely to vote for a Black candidate, when, on election day, they vote for his or her white opponent.

One theory for the Bradley effect is that some white voters give inaccurate polling responses for fear that, by stating their true preference, they will appear to the pollster to be racially prejudiced. The reluctance to give accurate polling answers has sometimes extended to post-election exit polls as well. The race of the pollster conducting the interview may be a factor into voters' answers. Some pollsters believe that they do not receive deliberately false answers from white voters. The Bradley effect, these pollsters believe, is caused by pollsters' failure to account for general conservative political leanings among undecided voters.. . . .

_________________“I'm not a member of any organized party. I'm a Democrat.”-Will Rogers