Hi I have been surfing the forums here for the last year or two and after all this I only have one question. Where is the line between being proud of our race and thinking everyone in it is superior to everyone in every other race? I ask this because this seems to be the thinking of some of our members, while I think we should all be proud of our race I can recognize that there are Negroes who are superior to whites and Caucasians who are superior to Negroes. Thoughts?

Hi I have been surfing the forums here for the last year or two and after all this I only have one question. Where is the line between being proud of our race and thinking everyone in it is superior to everyone in every other race? I ask this because this seems to be the thinking of some of our members, while I think we should all be proud of our race I can recognize that there are Negroes who are superior to whites and Caucasians who are superior to Negroes. Thoughts?

To me White Nationalism is the belief that we need a nation for our own race, where we can keep our own culture and increase our population, without interference from other races.

White supremacy is the belief that whites are superior to all other races.

The two beliefs are not mutually exclusive.

I have met white people I think of as an embarrassment to our race. However I have not met a single black or Hispanic that has even remotely bettered my view of their race, usually just worsens it with every one I meet.

There are some blacks who are better than me in every way you could imagine. There are some whites that I wouldn't consider worthy of cleaning my boots. That doesn't mean that I want my people bred out of existence and it doesn't mean that I want to live around any people but my own and there isn't anything wrong with that at all.

See? Very simple. No need to trouble over "better" or "worse". All that matters is that we're different.

Where is the line between being proud of our race and thinking everyone in it is superior to everyone in every other race?

The line is located at the exact same boundary as the line between subjectivity and objectivity.

If you are objective, you say that while it is obvious that races are different, there is no objective metric by which one might calculate as nebulous a concept as "superiority". Then you can say that subjectively you are proud of our race (nothing wrong with that) and that you prefer our race (again, nothing wrong with that).

If you want to be subjective about everything, then you fall for the jewsmedia's smear phrase, white supremacy, and say you're a white supremacist.

My advice: be objective about the nebulousness of the word "supremacy" and use that to trip up anti-whites at every turn. There's nothing like telling them they're stupid, ignorant, gullible, anti-white fools right from the start.

Personally, I like nothing more than explaining this and then saying: "And once again, the jewsmedia betrays its audience. And so, how often does the jewsmedia betray its audience? Every time, everysingletime!"

Hi I have been surfing the forums here for the last year or two and after all this I only have one question. Where is the line between being proud of our race and thinking everyone in it is superior to everyone in every other race? I ask this because this seems to be the thinking of some of our members, while I think we should all be proud of our race I can recognize that there are Negroes who are superior to whites and Caucasians who are superior to Negroes. Thoughts?

People get different ideas when you say a "supremacist" because "supremacy" could be taken to mean "supreme rule"-- which we aren't interested in. To the extent that "white nationalists" share a common goal, we want to be as separate as possible from non-European races.

That said, I find it disingenuous when people (correctly) use science to prove racial difference only to say that superiority is unscientific. Difference necessitates superiority and inferiority, on both individual and collective levels. Are we really going to deny our superiority over the 40-meter dash?

In my mind supremacy is just being superior because someone is a certain race. However nationalism on the other hand would have to do with a combination of things. Nationalism is wanting to have and preserve your own nation based on ethnic and cultural lines. Both ethnicity and culture would have to be essential to every white nation.

For example what is a white nation without white culture? A very backward state. If this white state had white culture and values it would be an economic powerhouse like modern day Germany and people would have the morals of whites throughout Europe and America during the early twentieth century. So to wrap it all up, nationalism is preservation and flourishing with both culture, race, and morals while supremacy is USUALLY just being superior due to your race.