From WikiLeaks

OCR'd and Google Translated for the Norwegian-challenged (needs some help):

Except public § 20. 1 b
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon resulatløse visit to Burma in the beginning of July is significant for
a General Secretary and an organization that is struggling to show leadership. At a time when the United Nations and the need for multilateral solutions to global crises is more necessary than ever, outstanding Ban and the United Nations with its absence. In the past six years, where follow-up of the many crises that characterized the fall's AGM would have brought the Secretary General and the UN on the scene with full force, the opposite seems to have happened.

In relation to the financial crisis, neither the Secretary General, or General Assembly, - Summit
about the financial crisis at the end of June despite - become the main arena, and the vacuum is
filled by the G-20 and other actors. Sans vote on behalf of G-1? 2 and the poor has been Kapten NOK
registry. An at times invisible General Secretary in combination with a rather special for president
The General Assembly has by far set the UN on the sidelines and the organization has not known his
Besøkelsestid. On the environmental / energy sector is struggling also with the United Nations to be relevant, despite the planned climate summit at the opening of the General Assembly this autumn. Although The Secretary-General to repeat that the irksome Copenhagen will "seal the deal" is the widespread concern that the UN summit is not going to contribute significant in the process toward
Copenhagen.

In the political / security crises around the world etterlyses also Secretary General's leadership and ability to deliver on the world body's behalf. Burma is a shining example in this respect. There's no shortage of warnings that the Secretary General should go at this time. Americans were among the most skeptical that he would travel, while the British thought he should. Special Envoy Gambari was also initially skeptical, but Ban insisted. Gambari noted that the recent negative media (titles such as "whereabouts unknown "in The Times and" Nowwhere Man "in Foreign Policy) Ban had made even more determined to visit Burma. After an apparently fruitless visit of the Secretary General, the UN
"good offices" will be further compounded. Special Envoy Gambari will have major problems in
continuation after "the top man" has failed and the generals in Yangoon no longer want to meet him.
Another example of poor handling from the Secretary General's page is the war in Sri Lanka.
The Secretary-General was a powerless observer of the civilian figures in thousands lost their lives and were driven from their homes. The authorities in Colombo refused to take the Secretary General while the war was in progress, but he was warmly invited and accept an invitation as soon as the war was "won". Although the UN Humanitarian efforts have been open and honest NOK, the Secretary General's moral voice and authority has been absent.

Also in other "crisis areas" such as Darfur, Somalia, Pakistan, Zimbabwe, and not least
Kongo, think Secretary General's often irresolute and small dedicated appeals to fall on the rocky ground.

Many will also argue that the handling of the investigation commission after the war in Gaza, ended
up but an unstable and careful follow-up.

More surprising, and the more disappointing is that the San Ki-moon has been virtually absent on
Disarmament and non-proliferation area. This was a field he himself pointed out that one of
its principal fields before he joined. The reorganization of the department for disarmament to an office
directly under the Secretary General led by a High Representative, would focus on major
this area, also released Secretary General's own background on the Korean peninsula. With a
New Non-Proliferation Treaty Review in 2010 and a U.S. administration that has set
team much higher on the agenda, it is discouraging that the Secretary General of the stronger
level involvement.

Common to all these cases is that a konturløs General Secretary with a lack of charisma, not
compensated with high-profile and visible employees. Ban has consistently chosen
special agents and officers in the secretariat that is characterized not visible, except in
Afghanistan. Moreover, to think he would prefer even to be in the center, without competition from
their employees, and let it shine through reasonably clear that the media statements are reserved for him themselves. The result is that the UN is a less visible and relevant player in areas where it had been naturally, - and required an active UN engagement. An honorable exception is the appointment of
Helen Clark as the new head of UNDP. She has in a short time showed good stroke. It is interesting to
result, if she gets room to promote the United Nations on the development side. As a woman from that part of the world can

Clark continued sailing as a competitor for Bans the second period.
Without decay into clichés, it is necessary to remind that to lead an organization with 192
member states, of course, is not easy. It is not possible to bring about consensus among member states
in some of these conflicts, and since Bans management philosophy is marked by the consensus thinking,
this easily leads to inactivity, maktesløshet and lack of promotion. A General of the United Nations must however, tolerate, and should be able to live with the criticism of the country as long as he stands firmly on the UN basic principles. The Secretary-General makes a total for the small degree of its position as chair of the voice these principles.

As known, there was a proven election from the then U.S. administration that it is not wanted an activist Secretary General. The new U.S. administration has not yet signaled a changed attitude to the ban, although it is reputed that some in Washington now refers Ban as "a one-term SG". It is said that people around both Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton are very negative to Ban, but the two have still to good to be broached on the matter. China is NOK also reasonable. happy with him and it is in the first series of China that sits on the key to whether Ban will be renewed for a second term. Russia has long been discontented with the Secretary General both in relation to the handling of Kosovo and Georgia, but also because of lack of recruitment of Russians in key positions. At the same time, Russia is well served by a not for interventionist General Secretary.

Among member states for other brands that the perception of Ban at mid-term is becoming increasingly
more negative. Of the many who thought that he should be given more time, that everything would be better when he was ...NOT MACHINE READABLE... learning potential seems to be exhausted and that the lack of charisma is indeed a problem. The Secretary-General seems to work well NOK when he sticks to script, and set up on meetings and events to a large extent. The problem occurs when he is "on his own" where he fails to set the agenda, create enthusiasm and show leadership - not internally. Bans lack of commitment and interest to put up good NOK into the issues, that he does not is an effective player or dealer in the many conflict situations, he is expected to be handle.

The mood on the "house" is still described as very motivating, with a decision structure that
characterized by having information both up and down in the system are filtered through it all, location
ubiquitous assistant cabinet chief Kim. After the recent negative media of The Secretary-General, should the mood on 38. floor to be fairly tense. Ban has constant rage outbursts, that even sober-minded and experienced people have trouble tackling. Relationship to Deputy Head Migiro is equally strained, and her action seems, if possible, to have been less. It is constantly rumored replacements and omrokkeringer. In addition to the reputation that Migiro is on the way out, it is reputed that OCHA-ieder Holms, who predominantly receive acclaim, will take over as Chef de Cabinet, and that Nambiar ends. The same is said about the leader of the political department, Pascoe and that's also a candidate to take over for him. The British are still very concerned NOK to get back the position. However, this is only a rumor and most likely come to San run with the same crew, - at least this year. If this is a good NOK for a second term Only time will show.