On Friday 24 July 2009, Tony Berth wrote:
> I wouldn't care about Sisvel. Let them try to sue you in ... China :) What
> Sisvel 'defines' is useless and they know that. How may chinese companies
> were sued anyway? :)
Christoph's problem is that as a reseller he's the one that gets sued, or has
his stock seized by customs. It's no good being right if you can't afford to
take it through court, and Sisvel know that too.
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Christoph Pulster
<openmoko at pulster.de>wrote:
> > >> 3. you got no MPEG-patent licences.
> > >
> > > We don't need them.
> >
> > Nobody needs them, but you have to pay them anyway.
> > (Sisvel definition: any piece of HW who can decode MPEG algorith)