Although Chief Deputy DA Karen Guidotti grandly tells the San Mateo Daily Journal reporter that if Ayres gets out, "the only place he will be going is back to San Mateo County for prosecution, " that's not what her boss DA Steve Wagstaffe told the mother of an in-statute Ayres victim on August 20, 2011, when he told her they were never going to retry Ayres.

Verbatim from Steve Wagstaffe: "Because of the 8-4 verdict on the competency trial, I cannot justify a repeat because I have an obligation to the taxpayers against spending more money on a subsequent trial that can't be won. "

Verbatim from Steve Wagstaffe: "Because of the 8-4 verdict on the competency trial, I cannot justify a repeat because I have an obligation to the taxpayers against spending more money on a subsequent trial that can't be won. "

I think Wags and his liberal judge friends feel they have an obligation to treat child molesters with no more than slap on the wrist in San Mateo County. San Mateo doesn't want the embarrassment of having locked up or released from juvenile detention based on the word of a child molester that THEY HIRED to "evaluate" young boys.

The DA and judges know that they can get away with letting it slide because the people of San Mateo county don't have the balls to call for the prosecution of child molesters. This is evidenced by the press in San Mateo: The Belmont Patch refers to a 21 year old rapist's acts with a 13 year old girl as "allegedly having sex with." And The San Mateo Daily Journal claims that they "had a sexual relationship" These reporters are pathetic, and have such a damaging view of these kinds of problems, but it is just reflective of the fact that the County does not like to incarcerate child molesters and rapists, and they don't even like to register their sex offenders.

Why is there no public outrage in San Mateo County over the William Ayres’ child molestation charges when similar charges in Pennsylvania brought rapid public outcries from the whole country? Do we value football more than the lives of young boys? Sandusky, unlike Ayres as a doctor, did not take an oath to “do no harm,” and boys were not sent to him for psychiatric treatment.

Ayres’ attorney is now using dementia as an excuse for his being unfit to stand trial or remain in custody at Napa State Mental Hospital for ongoing evaluation. If the County had acted on complaints filed in the ’80s and ceased sending referrals to Ayres, some 40+ young men would not still be seeking justice, to say nothing of the three victims who are now dead and will never have justice. Let us hope the county court will follow Deputy District Attorney Karen Guidotti’s statement that Ayres “belongs locked up” and not continue to treat him with deference and “kid gloves.”

Wagstaffe and the prosecutor on the case, Melissa McKowan, decided not to pursue a second competency trial despite receiving a videotape Friday of Ayres dining and laughing with his wife and two friends at a restaurant in San Francisco.

February 25, 2012 : "Committed Doctor Wants Out"

Chief Deputy DA Karen Guidotti: " If Ayres is to go anywhere, she said, it is back to San Mateo County for prosecution."_____

Which is it, Wagstaffe and Guidotti? Why can't you coordinate your stories out of the San Mateo District Attorney's office? It is cruel and inhuman for the victims and their families to have these people change their stories with the wind.

It's well past time for the Feds to investigate San Mateo District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe - whose office hired Ayres to evaluate boys and give court testimony for more than a decade - for his everchanging stories about what he is going to do with Ayres.

The prosecutor, Melissa Mckowan has been the subject of a months-long investigation by a government agency. At least two judges, including one who served on the Ayres case- are being scrutinized very closely by another government agency.

What is needed is a federal investigation into the thousands of court cases that Ayres was involved in. The Justice Department needs to reach out to every single boy who was evaluated by him in a court session.

As there is evidence that Ayres made bargains with them - "let me molest you and you won't go to juvenile hall", it is more than likely that Ayres sent boys to California Youth Authority who resisted his advances. This is a violation of their civil rights . The entire County's mishandling and misconduct in this case HAS to be investigated by the Justice Department.

William Ayres' daughter Barbara has just petitioned the courts to become her father's conservator. This is odd, as medical colleagues say that Barbara Ayres has been estranged from her father (guess the reason) for years. While Ayres' son Robert Ayres dutifully attended his father's criminal trial in 2009, Barbara was a no-show.

Funny, the doctors at Napa State Hospital haven't decided whether Ayres is mentally incompetent. But in her petition to be Conservator, Barbara Ayres is portraying him as a doddering old man.

The petition states: "William Ayres is diagnosed with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Without the assistance of others he is unable personally to provide for his daily needs as a result of the increasingly debilitating effects of the dementia, especially in the exposure to risk of self injury from falling and in failing to manage his medication regimen accurately. Failing memory also prevents him from managing his other health care needs without the assistance of others."

Geez, Ayres was perfectly fine back in August, when he was hanging out in that San Francisco restaurant, eating and drinking alcohol with no assistance; holding court with his pals about the Iowa Straw Polls and his past business ventures.

What kind of scam is the dysfunctional Ayres family trying to pull off now?

According to one insider, when the San Mateo Police did a search warrant on Ayres' home in 2006, they found letters from Barbara Ayres to her father. Barbara's letters, according to the insider, contained incriminating information about her father.

McDougall describes "Mr." Ayres' demeanor at two meetings at his law office on April 2, 2011 and at a visitor's room at Napa State hospital on March 1, 2012 as "pleasant and cooperative." He states that Ayres "expressed concern over placing a burden on his daughter. He felt that she possessed the knowledge and skills needed to do a great job but did not want to burden her with responsibilities. "

Macdougall then states,"Mr." Ayres expressed serious concerns about leaving Napa State Hospital for either a residential home or his home with his wife. He understood that the conservator would have with court approval the power to decide his residence."

So if he doesn't go home or to a residential home, where does Ayres propose he go? And is he not aware that he's still under a criminal indictment and doesn't have any say about where he gets to go?

I
agree that my access and use of the MaleSurvivor discussion forums and
chat room is subject to the terms of this Agreement. AND the sole
discretion of MaleSurvivor. I agree that my use of MaleSurvivor
resources are AT-WILL,
and that my posting privileges may be terminated at any time, and for
any reason by MaleSurvivor.