China’s Appetite for Wood Takes a Heavy Toll on Forests

More than half of the timber now shipped globally is destined for China. But unscrupulous Chinese companies are importing huge amounts of illegally harvested wood, prompting conservation groups to step up boycotts against rapacious timber interests.By william laurance

In Chinese folklore, a dragon symbolizes strength. It is an apt icon for a nation whose rise as an economic superpower has been nothing short of meteoric.

While China’s stunning economic advances have come at significant environmental cost, the boom has been a plus in a few realms. The country is investing avidly in green technologies, such as solar energy and high-tech car batteries. It has also undertaken an ambitious national reforestation program, while cracking down on illegal forest clearing and logging inside its borders. According to the UN Food and Agricultural Organization, forest cover in China, including large areas of timber plantations, increased from 157 million hectares in 1990 to 197 million hectares in 2005.

Counter-intuitively, the expansion of Chinese forests has occurred at the same time the country has been developing an immense export industry for

In its fervor to secure timber, China is increasingly seen as a predator on the world’s forests.

wood and paper products. China is now the “wood workshop for the world,” according to Forest Trends, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, consuming more than 400 million cubic meters of timber annually to feed both its burgeoning exports and growing domestic demands. Production of paper products has also grown dramatically in China, doubling from 2002 to 2007.

But the rise of the Chinese dragon has a darker side. As much as half of the timber and much of the paper pulp consumed by China is imported, primarily from tropical nations or nearby Siberia. In and of itself, there is nothing wrong with this — China has every right to grow economically and seek the kind of prosperity that industrial nations have long enjoyed. However, in its fervor to secure timber, minerals, and other natural resources, China is increasingly seen as a predator on the world’s forests.

China is now overwhelmingly the biggest global consumer of tropical timber, importing around 40 to 45 million cubic meters of timber annually. Today, more than half of all timber being shipped anywhere in the world is destined for China. Many nations in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa export the lion’s share of their timber to China.

China faces three criticisms by those worried about the health and biodiversity of the world’s forests. First, the country and its hundreds of wood-products corporations and middlemen have been remarkably aggressive in pursuing timber supplies globally, while generally being little concerned with social equity or environmental sustainability. For instance, China has helped fund and promote an array of ambitious new road or rail projects that are opening up remote forested regions in the Amazon, Congo Basin, and Asia-Pacific to exploitation. Such frontier roads can unleash a Pandora’s Box of activities — including illegal colonization, hunting, mining, and land speculation — that are often highly destructive to forests.

Vast expanses of Sumatran rainforest are being turned into paper pulp.

China is also a major consumer of wood pulp, which is helping to drive large-scale deforestation in places like Sumatra and Borneo. During a recent visit to Sumatra, I witnessed the felling of large expanses of native rainforests, which are being chopped up and fed into the world’s largest wood-pulp plant, located nearby, and replaced by monocultures of exotic acacia trees.

Second, China, in its relentless pursuit of timber, almost exclusively seeks raw logs. Raw logs are the least economically beneficial way for developing nations to exploit their timber resources, as they provide only limited royalties and little employment, workforce training, and industrial development. As a result, most of the profits from logging are realized by foreign timber-cutters, shippers, and wood-products manufacturers. A cubic meter of the valuable timber merbau (Intsia bijuga), for instance, yields only around $11 to local communities in Indonesian Papua but around $240 when delivered as raw logs to wood-products manufacturers in China, who profit further by converting it into prized wood flooring.

Finally, China has done little to combat the scourge of illegal logging, which is an enormous problem in many developing nations. A 2011 report on illegal logging by Interpol and the World Bank concluded that, among 15 of the major timber-producing countries in the tropics, two-thirds had half or more of their timber harvested illegally. Globally, economic losses and tax and royalty evasion from illegal logging are thought to cost around $15 billion annually — a large economic burden for developing nations. Forest ecosystems suffer serious impacts as well, because illegal loggers frequently ignore environmental controls on cutting operations.

According to a 2010 analysis by Chatham House, a respected UK think tank, illegal logging is slowly declining globally but this is despite, rather than because of, China’s influence. The report concluded that, from 2000 to 2008, China imported 16 to 24 million cubic meters of illegal timber each

One report said that China imports 16 to 24 million cubic meters of illegal timber each year.

year. This is an incredible figure — twice the total amount imported annually by leading industrial nations.

Around a third of Chinese timber imports are ultimately exported, as furniture, plywood, flooring, disposable chopsticks, and other wood products. European countries, the U.S, and Japan are the biggest importers, with consumers there often unaware of the illicit origin of many wood products from China.

When it comes to illegal or predatory logging, it has not been easy to get China’s attention. Stories about illegal logging rarely penetrate the Chinese news media. For example, in 2006 the Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation (ATBC), an international scientific organization, held its annual conference in Kunming, China. At the time I was president of the ATBC, and I spoke at length to Chinese journalists about the problem of illegal logging and the risks it posed for Chinese exporters. To my knowledge, not a single story about my concerns was reported in China, even though I emailed the journalists a summary of my comments translated into Mandarin Chinese.

Outside China, the story is different. Awareness of the rapacious nature of Chinese timber interests is growing, especially since a 2005 report by a green group, the Environmental Investigation Agency, that detailed massive illegal logging and timber theft in the Indonesian state of Papua. Smuggled timber from Papua arrived in mainland China via international criminal syndicates involving corrupt Indonesian insiders, Malaysian loggers, and Singaporean shippers. Other groups, such as the World Resources Institute, Forest Trends, WWF, and Greenpeace, have laid similar claims against China. With mainstream organizations such as the World Bank, Interpol, and Chatham House joining in, what began as murmurs of concern is becoming a loud clamor for change.

This is a dangerous situation for Chinese businesses and exporters. Influential environmental organizations in Europe and North America have their eye on China. For example, the Rainforest Action Network (RAN) has waged a campaign urging corporate customers to avoid paper and pulp products originating from two of Indonesia’s largest corporations, Asian

Efforts to combat illicit timber imports are finally beginning to gain some traction in China.

Pulp & Paper (APP) and APRIL, which are felling large expanses of native rainforest for wood pulp. The pulp and paper have been used by Chinese manufacturers to make branded products for scores of well-known companies around the world. Some of those companies — including Gucci, Scholastic, Hachette, and Tiffany & Co. — have switched to recycled and sustainably certified paper products. As of this year, other companies — including Prada, American Greetings, Marc Jacobs, and the Rupert Murdoch-owned HarperCollins publishing — are continuing to use APP or APRIL paper products supplied by Chinese manufacturers, according to RAN.

Such actions could have a big impact on Chinese exports. Boycotts initiated by green groups can have a major influence on consumer preferences and have forced some of the largest retail chains in North America and Europe, such as Walmart and Ikea, to limit products sourced from old-growth forests. Meanwhile, eco-certified timber products accounted for $7.4 billion in sales in the U.S. alone in 2005, and were expected to grow to $38 billion there by 2010. At some point, Chinese companies will buck the trend toward sustainable logging at their peril.

Adding teeth to such consumer actions are tougher laws and initiatives in industrial nations. In particular, new provisions to the Lacey Act in the U.S., and the European Union Timber Action Plan in Europe are increasingly holding corporations that import illicit timber products responsible for their actions.

One senses that efforts to combat illicit timber imports are finally beginning to gain some traction in China. The relevant government agencies are now engaged, and the country has commissioned an analysis of its role as an importer of illegal timber and released draft guidelines to improve sustainability of its timber-importing corporations. It also recently hosted the Asia Forest Partnership Dialogue 2011, in Beijing, designed to assess progress in efforts to combat illegal logging in Asia over the last decade.

A new imaging system is capable of providing detailed, three-dimensional pictures of tropical forests — including the species they contain and the amount of CO2 they store — at astonishing speed. These advances, Rhett Butler writes, could play a key role in preserving the world’s beleaguered rainforests.READ MORE

However, China still has no national action plan or legislation to prevent the import of illegally sourced timber, and no formal trade arrangements with major timber-producing countries designed to improve enforcement. Despite dominating the global timber market, Chinese wood-products corporations feel little pressure from buyers to improve the legality of their timber products and consider it largely unimportant to their future competitiveness, according to the Chatham House report.

The bottom line: China’s efforts to limit the environmental impacts of its burgeoning timber imports are still mostly lip-service, with little practical impact.

Check the labels when you shop for any wood or paper products. If it says, “Made in China,” be wary of the dragon, and think twice before buying.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

William Laurance is Distinguished Research Professor and an Australian Laureate at James Cook University in Queensland, Australia. He is also the Prince Bernhard Chair in
International Nature Conservation at Utrecht University, Netherlands. His research on the impacts of intense land use on tropical forests and species has ranged from the Amazon to Africa to tropical Australia. In an earlier article for Yale Environment 360, he wrote that rising temperatures are already taking a toll on tropical species.
MORE BY THIS AUTHOR

COMMENTS

The article raises an important issue of PRC being a major importer of illegal tropical timber, and the need for the country to implement policies that prevent it. Such a move would greatly reduce demand for illagal timber so supporting the efforts to reduce unplanned deforestation and degradation in the source countries. The article also provides a warning to producers in PRC of the potential consumer boycotts of their products in those countries where civil society groups have a strong influence. However, those key messages are undermined by the delivery of the article which I feel makes the warning sound like a threat to PRC rather than an attempt to engage and encourage, and mixes analysis with opinion.

The article is listed as an analysis but the concluding sentences are the opinion of the author unsubstantiated by the analysis (i.e. PRC's lack of sincerity), and rather than just making the observation that a consumer boycott could result if there was not an improvement the author crosses the line to actually advocate a boycott now. Even if the University of Queensland wanted to support the process of preventing tropical timber entering PRC, I think you would now find the door firmly closed. But that's just my opinion.

Posted by
Philip Wells
on 18 Nov 2011

PLEASE STOP cutting down the trees. This is destroying our forests for someone else to profit
from. This is NOT right. Something NEEDS to be done NOW before it is too late.

Posted by
Terri Hughes
on 18 Nov 2011

Things always change slowly in the land of the dragon. Certainly there are some good business practices that are natural to the Chinese way of doing business. Their willingness to educate and employ the locals to work in their enterprises; their willingness to pay a percentage of their profits into the native government coffers; their willingness to help local governments build the necessary infrastructure are all sound and beneficial practices that Big Western Oil doesn't do. Tibet for example is controlled by China. Tibet has arge forests; heavy and precious metals and rare earth deposits; not to mention that it also controls the headwaters of five of the major world rivers. This is the only reason that the US government; the CIA and the NGOs support the Dalai Lama. The monks regime was sexually brutal and invasive if the truth be known.

On the other hand Chinese consumption of illegal products sanctioned under global law comes to mind. The purchase of illegal lumber from Indonesia; Sumatra; the Amazon and India is one example.

If the the Three Gorges Dam were ever to break it would cause such an environmental disaster that would affect China, Russia and a great deal of South East Asia. China needs to improve its environmental footprint and rapidly.

Then of course there is the amount of pollution caused by the non regulation of China's factories and automobiles coupled with its labor practices and human rights. China also has such a significant portion of its population that cooks openly with fossil fuels. Things in China are changing but change in China is slow. It needs to improve its track record but it needs to do it properly at the expense of PROFIT.

Posted by
Michael Kirkby
on 19 Nov 2011

I hope to see much greater efforts to salvage wood from demolition, as well as projects to build without the use of wood. More cob and adobe where it's feasible, recylcled metal for studs, etc. Earth so badly needs to restore and preserve its forestry that it is becoming intolerable how much of it is being cut for building.

Posted by
TRB
on 19 Nov 2011

The export value of China's exports during 2010 of timber and paper products to the USA and EU - which prohibit the import of illegal wood-based products - amounted to roughly US$8bi and US$5 bi (timber) and US$1.5bi each (paper) respectively.

It is likely that on average 20%-30% of that timber was illegal and the proportion of that paper which was made at least partly from illegal Indonesian pulp exceded 10%.

If (and this a big IF) the Lacey Act and its equivalent in the EU are implemented robustly, they should improve some US$4 billion of China's exports. This is small relative to China's overall exports.

Many Chinese exporters would prefer not to base their business on crime, but it takes two to tango - they need a level playing field in their export markets.

Posted by
James Hewitt
on 21 Nov 2011

Reduce importing goods from China can help this. Many Americans (and others in other countries alike) always enjoy cheap goods even they are not necessary - change your purchase behaviors today and it may change the world tomorrow.

Posted by
Mandy
on 21 Nov 2011

It has become more and more obvious that it is impossible to build industrial economies without
massive quantities of wood being fed into their maw. Given the rate of deforestation, and the overall state of the forest China may be the last place in the world that actually thinks it has a chance to join the middle class because there will be no resources to build the next industrial giant.

Posted by
greg Gerritt
on 23 Nov 2011

It cannot reach a conclusion without involving politics.

Posted by
Luyi
on 25 Nov 2011

Why not we think of banning importing of specific products made of tropical wood and campaign against its use when is is not possible to do anything at producer end, something need to be done at the consumer's end for the shake of conservation which is at stake as revealed in the article.

Posted by
Asesh Lahiri
on 07 Dec 2011

In China this past January, I stayed in private apartments in Harbin and Beijing. The floors of each of these was comprised of hardwood - likely the Indonesian merbau of this article. Multiply this by the millions of apartments having been or now being constructed all over the country and you have the result of decimation of the world's tropical forests. Should this come as a surprise? Hardly. Why has China been investing in roads across the tropical world?

The fundamental issue is finding the key to change the mindset of the Chinese, one that enables the country to enact protection of its own forests (because of the devastating impact of floods and landslides - a very practical reason, of course) while felling them across the rest of the planet. I doubt that consumer boycotts will prompt change.

Posted by
Len Milich
on 06 Feb 2012

China is in the middle of value chain of wood business- processing wood which comes from both legal/illegal sources and sending to the US and EU. An integrated approach should be used to prevent illegal logging from the source, and illegal purchasing from the end.

In Kenya’s Mountain Forests, A New Path to Conservation Kenya’s high-elevation forests are the source for most of the water on which the drought-plagued nation depends. Now, after decades of government-abetted abuse of these regions, a new conservation strategy of working with local communities is showing signs of success.READ MORE

Wood Pellets: Green Energy or New Source of CO2 Emissions? Burning wood pellets to produce electricity is on the rise in Europe, where the pellets are classified as a form of renewable energy. But in the U.S., where pellet facilities are rapidly being built, concerns are growing about logging and the carbon released by the combustion of wood biomass.READ MORE

A Decade After Asian Tsunami, New Forests Protect the Coast The tsunami that struck Indonesia in 2004 obliterated vast areas of Aceh province. But villagers there are using an innovative microcredit scheme to restore mangrove forests and other coastal ecosystems that will serve as a natural barrier against future killer waves and storms.READ MORE