Objective is perfectly valid, namely to provide an objective, quantitative
comparison of efficiency with and without the magnet. There are theories
(which may or may not be correct). I am less interested in a questionable
theory than quantitative results. So far there are no results.
Of course it is difficult to always have a complete theory of anything
complex (combustion dynamics are complex) but that doesn't stop us using it.
For example the human brain is too complex to have a theory of how it works,
yet we all use ours - I hope.
(nihil)

The consumer society here had proved the magnetic fuel savers had nothing to
do with fuel saving.
"Jumping off from the roof of a 10 storied won't hurt"... I won't try it
myself but if anyone has, please let me know... Of course, I don't expect
any reply in this subject from the test object...
Please note: "The hydrocarbons present did not interact with the magnetic
field at all" -- quoted by another PhD.
I remember you are sort of a PhD, as I see you have an UK email address, I
hope we weren't in the same college.
hehehe Good night
E14 4NS
(nihil)

Re: magnetic fuel savers or performance improvers
KIND OF makes you wonder were his sheep skin is hanging.
or is still on the SHEEP?
CASE
The consumer society here had proved the magnetic fuel savers had
nothing to do with fuel saving.
"Jumping off from the roof of a 10 storied won't hurt"... I won't try it
myself but if anyone has, please let me know... Of course, I don't
expect any reply in this subject from the test object...
Please note: "The hydrocarbons present did not interact with the
magnetic field at all" -- quoted by another PhD.
I remember you are sort of a PhD, as I see you have an UK email address,
I hope we weren't in the same college.

Well, I did try putting some old magnets out of my trashed HDD on the fuel
line to experiment, didn't seem to do much. Of course, the alignment of the
magnetic dipoles might have been off. FWIW.
The epa doesn't seem to think they make a difference.
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/gasave.htm
Cheers,
WS

With common sense, I don't believe this microscopic reaction may help a lot
on combustion.
Thanks Lee's FTC web site. Those folks have bought the magnets or ionization
devices MUST read http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/gasave.htm
Talking about ionization, I quite like the idea of fuel cell. Charlie's
hydrogen nuclear reminded me the fuel cell. Has anyone got a fuel cell?
Keith
E14 4NS Docklands ... Millwall
???...

Log in

Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.