3
What we’ll cover: Multi-unit housing and smoke-free policies in Michigan The rights of multi-unit housing owners to restrict the use of medical marijuana on their properties How restrictions are being implemented

6
Smoke-free apartments in 2000? Three PHAs in the U.S. had smoke-free policies Virtually no smoke-free apartments could be found in the U.S. in private or public housing Most apartment owners & many HUD officials thought it was illegal to have a smoke-free policy Most tenants didn’t realize they had some rights to smoke-free housing

7
2010: Market-rate housing Hundreds of thousands of units of market- rate housing are smoke-free all across Michigan and the U.S. Includes large, multi-state companies, moderate sized companies, small companies, and single-family home rentals.

8
2010: Other affordable housing Tens of thousands of units of affordable housing are smoke-free all across Michigan and U.S. Includes apartment buildings owned by for- profit and non-profit entities, as well as local governments and tribes.

9
2010: Smoke-Free Housing Authorities Nov. 1, 2010: about 225 housing authorities in 27 states. Dec. 31, 2004: about 18 housing authorities in 9 states had smoke-free policies for some or all their buildings. An increase of about 1,300% in 70 months. About 3 new housing authorities per month

10
2010: Smoke-Free Michigan Housing Commissions Nov. 1, 2010: 49 housing commissions have smoke-free policies; ranging from small to the largest, & including two tribal PHAs; over 8,200 apartment units. June 30, 2005: No Michigan housing commission had a smoke-free policy. About 1/3 of Michigan PHAs are smoke- free.

12
Smoke-Free Policies are Legal Smoke-free policies are legal in HUD public housing, HUD-subsidized and other affordable housing, as well as in market- rate housing. That is: in all housing. Neither federal nor state law prohibits an owner from making their apartment building totally smoke-free. Michigan Attorney General Opinion #6719, May 4, 1992

13
Smoke-Free Policies are Legal As the HUD letters have stated: “The right to smoke or not to smoke is not a right that is protected under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because smokers are not a protected class under federal law.”

16
What about medical marijuana in market-rate multi-unit housing? Smoke-free policies may include a prohibition on smoking of medical marijuana. Federal law still considers marijuana a prohibited controlled substance. Federal law trumps state law.

17
What about medical marijuana in market-rate multi-unit housing? Federal Controlled Substances Act 21 U.S.C. §801 et seq. Classifies marijuana as a “Schedule 1” drug. Prohibits the manufacture, distribution, dispensation, and possession of marijuana. Supremacy Clause of U.S. Constitution Article VI, Paragraph 2 Federal law supersedes state law where there is a direct conflict of laws.

18
What about a reasonable accommodation to use medical marijuana? Federal Fair Housing Act 42 U.S.C. §3601 et seq. Defines a person as disabled if s/he has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major activities of daily living. Permits a disabled person to file a Fair Housing complaint seeking a “reasonable accommodation” to permit them to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling unit or common space. However: The Fair Housing Act states that a disability/handicap “does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance” as defined in the Controlled Substances Act.

19
What about a reasonable accommodation to use medical marijuana? Further: Even if the requested “reasonable accommodation” to use marijuana for medicinal purposes were granted, such accommodation need not, and should not, result in the exposure of other residents to secondhand marijuana smoke, since such an outcome should render the accommodation unreasonable. If a “reasonable accommodation” is deemed warranted, one should argue that an accommodation can only be reasonable if it avoids other residents exposure to secondhand smoke. One such option could be identifying and utilizing other non-smoking methods of using marijuana. Final point: This has risk management and legal implications for multi-unit property owners and advice of legal counsel is well advised.

20
What about medical marijuana in “affordable” multi-unit housing? Public and other subsidized housing owners have the same rights as market rate owners to adopt smoke-free policies. HOWEVER, in any HUD-subsidized housing, federal law and HUD policies are clear: the possession or use of marijuana is prohibited.

21
What about medical marijuana in “affordable” multi-unit housing? Quality Housing & Work Responsibility Act of 1998 (Public Housing Reform Act) and HUD Regulations prohibit the possession and use of marijuana for any purposes. See September 24, 1999 HUD General Counsel memorandum titled “Medical use of marijuana in public housing”. http://www.mismokefreeapartment.org/HUD-MM1999.pdf

22
What have been the experiences thus far in multi- unit housing? HUD & USDA have informed public housing authorities and other HUD & USDA-subsidized apartment owners that they can evict tenants who use or possess marijuana, including those who are certified by MDCH to use it. A number of housing commissions and HUD & USDA- subsidized apartment owners have informed residents of the above notice. A number of persons have been evicted from public and affordable housing for using medical marijuana.

23
What have been the experiences thus far in multi- unit housing? A number of market-rate apartment owners have indicated that they will be or have already amended their leases to explicitly prohibit the use or smoking of marijuana in their buildings, including those certified by MDCH to use marijuana for medicinal reasons.

24
Case law The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld Congress's authority under the commerce clause to enact the Controlled Substances Act and prohibit the intrastate use of marijuana, even when a state's medical marijuana law allows its use, i.e., federal law trumps state law. Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 50 (2005) (Analyzing California law) Washington state Appeals Court upheld a housing authority eviction of a tenant who was using marijuana for medicinal reasons. The Court determined that requiring a housing authority to violate federal law was not reasonable. Assenberg v. Anacortes Housing Authority, Wash: Court of Appeals, 1st Div. 2007

25
Case law Oregon Supreme Court ruled that an employer did not have to accommodate a workers’ medical marijuana use because federal law’s prohibition on all use of marijuana trumped state law allowing its use for medical reasons. Employee’s firing was upheld. Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries, April 14, 2010 A federal District Court in the Eastern District of Washington determined that the Americans with Disabilities Act did not protect individuals who are currently engaged in the use of illegal drugs, regardless of whether Washington state law allowed such use. Barber v. Gonzales, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37411 (2005)

29
Parkside Plan Apartment Features Amenities 100% Smoke Free The demand for smoke-free environments is rising, and Parkside is listening. Parkside Commons will be a 100% smoke-free environment, making it one of Massachusetts’ premier smoke-free rental communities, inside and out. Smoking is banned in all common areas, on the grounds, and in the apartments themselves. Why 100%? Cigarette smoking is hazardous to your health and it’s the number one preventable cause of death. Second-hand smoke can be just as deadly. Cigarette smoke and its very noticeable odor travels farther than most of us realize, permeating rooms and getting into walls, ceilings, carpeting, drapes and clothing. At Parkside, you have a right to fresh and pure air. Parkside welcomes residents who care about themselves. Our non-smoking policy is simply another way to support our commitment to creating a clean, healthy, active community for all.