When your Ex is a Freemason

MAUREEN SPALEK

Maureen is another victim of the endemic and systemic corruption that is ravaging society. Please help her get her children back.

LIVERPOOL: CITY OF CORRUPTION AND INJUSTICE

On the 21st March 2003, a 4 year old child was playing in a Liverpool Park when he was run down by a youth on a scooter bike. The child was taken to a local CHILDRENS HOSPITAL IN LIVERPOOL, the mother was traumatised at watching her son being hit and nearly killed. The mother on arriving at the hospital was informed her son had a badly cut face and a broken leg. It took the hospital 28 hours before her son had his broken leg set in plaster and his badly gashed face seen to by a plastic surgeon.

Over this period of time she stayed with him for 3 days and nights looking after him. Whilst attending to her son’s needs, she also endeavoured to find time to make regular vists back home to see to her other children who were 11 months old and 2 years old who were being attentively looked after by their grandmother. On Monday morning 24th March 2003 her son and her two other children were taken into care by the Local Authorities. The mother was later informed that the hospital staff had made allegations that she had been abusive, aggressive and threatening towards them and has assaulted one member of staff also refused her son medication and was threatening towards him also.

If the mother was all of these things then WHY was the mother left on the ward to look after her son for 3 days and nights?

There has been no independent evidence to support the hospitals staff allegations in court, ie other parents or patients on the ward, or CCTV evidence which the hospital is fully equipped with. Furthermore, if the mother was all of these things then whey was she not removed immediately from the hospital premises as clearly stated in the hospital policy?

WHY was the mother allowed to leave and return to the hospital premises at her will?

THE MOTHER WAS FURTHER INFORMED THAT THE HOSPITAL STAFF HAD WRITTEN IN THEIR NOTES THAT SHE HAD BEEN SECTIONED UNDER THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS AND THAT HER 3 CHILDREN WERE PLACED ON AN AT RISK REGISTER. BOTH THESE STATEMENTS WERE PROVEN IN COURT TO BE FALSE AND UNTRUE. THE JUDGE, HOWEVER, INSISTED THAT THE CASE WOULD NOT BE DISMISSED, BUT THAT THE 3 CHILDREN SHALL REMAIN IN THE CARE OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY.

The present situation is that the father has residence of his son and that her other two children have now been freed for adoption in the near future. The fact that the mothers ex-husband is an ex- Royal Naval Officer of a high rank and is still at present employed by the M.O.D. furthermore that he should make such a statement within weeks of the children going into care only proved to the mother that her ex-husband was using his influence.

It would therefore seem clear that he was involved in the outcome of this case by pre empting the judgement before it had been made and therefore a grave INJUSTICE has taken place. Please help to expose this illegal act by the local authorities – by contacting 07981 000 287 or www.sharonkilby.co.uk