Press Release

Press Room > New school finance data analysis shows deep inequities, but gaps in some states decreasing

New school finance data analysis shows deep inequities, but gaps in some states decreasing

Share this article:

Publication date: Aug 8, 2002

(Washington, DC) – The Education Trust today released a new report documenting large funding gaps between high- and low-poverty and -minority districts in many states. The analysis reveals that, in most states, school districts that educate the greatest number of low-income and minority students receive substantially less state and local money per student than districts with the fewest low-income and minority students.

“In too many states, we see yet again that the very students who need the most, get the least,” said Kati Haycock, director of The Education Trust upon releasing the report. “At a time when schools, districts and states are rightly focusing on closing the achievement gap separating low-income and minority students from other students, states can and must do more to close these funding gaps.”

Analysis digs beneath averages to reveal gaps

Most education finance data is reported either in averages or in terms of inequities – regardless of whom those inequities affect. This analysis digs beneath both kinds of reports to get at the question of what levels of state and local funding are available for different groups of students. The Funding Gap: Low-Income and Minority Students Receive Fewer Dollars, a new study of school finance data by The Education Trust, finds that:

Districts Serving the Greatest Number of Poor Students Get Less State and Local Money

In 30 of 47 states studied, the quarter of districts educating the greatest number of poor students receive substantially less (i.e. a difference of $100 or more per student) state and local money per student than the quarter of districts educating the fewest poor students (see Table 1).

Nationally, Gap Between High- and Low-Poverty Districts Shrinking But Some States Getting Worse

The good news is that the gap has decreased in 27 states since 1997, in some cases by a substantial amount.

Unfortunately, the gap has increased substantially (i.e. grown by more than $100/student) in 9 states over the same period (see Table 2).

Districts Serving the Greatest Number of Minority Students Get Less State and Local Money

In 31 of 47 states studied, districts enrolling the highest of minority students receive substantially fewer (i.e. a difference of $100 or more per student) state and local education dollars per student than districts enrolling the lowest percentages of minority students (see Table 3).

These gaps have real consequences for the quality of education low-income and minority children can receive. In New York, for example - the state with the largest funding gaps - the $2,152 per student difference by poverty enrollment translates into a whopping $860,800 difference between high- and low-poverty elementary schools of the same size (400 students each). That amount would easily be enough for the high-poverty school to compete with elite suburban schools for the most qualified teachers and also provide extra instructional time for students who are behind. Nationally, districts that educate the greatest number of poor students receive $966 less per student than low-poverty districts.

“The good news is, nationally and in some states, the gap between high- and low-poverty districts is shrinking. But overall, these data indicate clearly that those of us who are interested in ensuring that high poverty and high minority schools get the resources to help their students achieve at higher levels must urge states to do more to close their funding gaps,” Haycock continued.

What States Can Do (see pp. 12-13)

States establish the systems that fund public schools, and thus it is states that must act to close these gaps. The most common approaches are for states to reduce reliance on local property taxes by assuming a greater share of overall school funding and to heavily target poorer districts when distributing those state tax revenues. Most states now do some version of both of those things. How much the state needs to do is, of course, a function of how much inequality there is in local resources. The problem is that many dont do enough to make up for what can often be huge resource differences between poor and wealthy communities. States can and must do more.

“Twelve years ago, the nation’s governors joined with then-President Bush in setting this nation on a course toward higher standards for ’all’ students. In return for a renewed focus on the ’all’ part, this year’s No Child Left Behind Act provided high-poverty districts with additional resources. But states have to do their parts, too. In an era of high standards and ever-higher stakes, funding gaps are unconscionable,” Haycock concluded.

Methodology:

The study was conducted for The Education Trust by school finance expert Greg F. Orlofsky, who analyzed a specially-constructed data base containing demographic and finance data for over 15,000 school districts in 1999-2000, the latest year for which comparable data currently are available. The analysis, conducted during May-June 2002, used techniqu ate a measure that is more sophisticated and reliable than the raw figures included in many other studies.

This analysis includes state and local revenues only, and does not include federal dollars. It recognizes that federal dollars are intended to supplement, not supplant, tax revenues raised from stat and local sources. (For an expanded explanation of the methodology, see pp.14-15 of the report.)

Stay Informed

Join our email list to get weekly updates.

Related Content

“I must have taken the ACT seven or eight times.” Hailey, a bubbly former cheerleader who graduated fourth in her class from her central Louisiana high school, let out a pained chuckle still heavy with disbelief. She’d set her eyes on scoring a 20 or higher, the score…

There’s a raging debate on health care right now. Issues of access, coverage, and cost are dominating newspaper headlines, social media channels, and even sports radio programming. One thing that’s not being discussed enough, however, is the influence of quality public education on health outcomes. Yet research from…

This essay was originally published in a compilation from the Albert Shanker Institute as part of an event it hosted today titled “School Integration By Race & Class: A Movement Reborn?” Our children live in a more diverse country than ever before. And America is projected to become even more racially…

Among the most important questions to ask to understand whether a state accountability system is designed to promote opportunity and achievement for all groups of students are: Do all groups of students matter in the ratings given to individual schools? How does the state identify schools that need to improve…

WASHINGTON (05/23/17) – “The Trump administration’s budget request is an assault on the American Dream. This shortsighted and cruel proposal would make the climb to success much steeper for all our young people, especially students of color and students from low-income families. Instead of investing in…

This week, we rightly celebrate the milestone Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision issued on May 17th, 1954, striking down school segregation. Yet today also marks another anniversary — the annual issuing of statements reminding us that, decades later, we still have not closed the gaps in access and…

When is performance for a group of students so low that it requires attention and action? This is one of the critical questions that states have to answer as they implement the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). The law requires states to identify any school that is consistently underperforming for…

Today marks the 63rd anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision. On this anniversary, we celebrate the progress we have made as a nation in bringing educational equity and opportunity to millions of students in America. Our nation’s high school graduation rate is at a record high…