“And in trying to balance those two, without a lot of direction from the legislature, or without a lot of direction from the statute, we kind of had to come up with this calculation that we thought complied with both the letter and the spirit of the law,” Gunn said.

Gunn calls the renewable energy regulations “extremely complicated.” And he says even though they survived their latest legal challenge, he expects it won’t be the last.

“I suspect that the groups that lost today will ask for transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court, and ultimately that’s where I think it’s going to end up,” Gunn said.

A spokesperson for one of the legal challengers, the utility company Ameren, declined to comment, saying the company had not yet had time to review the court’s decision.

Other challengers include the utility trade group the Missouri Energy Development Association, the lobbying organization the Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers, and the Empire District Electric Company, which is based in Joplin.

Related Content

Standing outside the Central Minnesota Ethanol Co-Op in Little Falls, Minn., there's not a lot going on. The pungent smell of fermentation that typically hangs in the air here is absent. And trucks piled high with corn are nowhere to be seen.

They're idled in part because of high corn prices. And it's unclear when that will change.

"Most of the industry is just breaking even in terms of profitability or actually running at slightly negative margins," says Geoff Cooper, vice president of research and analysis at the Renewable Fuels Association.

General Motors can move forward on a proposed $380 million expansion of its plant in Wentzville, now that a union has approved local work rules for the plant. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that members of United Auto Workers Local 2250 approved the four-year local work rules contract on Thursday. GM has said the expansion will create up to 1,850 jobs for the region. GM plans to build a new mid-size pickup at Wentzville as part of the expansion.

Circuit Judge Daniel Green’s initial ruling in June stated that the $2 per-watt solar rebate was essentially a seizure of private property from St. Louis-based Ameren Missouri. But he has temporarily vacated that ruling to allow other interested parties to file briefs in the case.