IDK.
I'm thinking a drink of water in a LIVE broadcast may be a signal of something about to be said...or just said.
The FIJI bottle was the first time I saw a brand name...and POTUS made such a dramatic show of drinking it.

IDK.
I'm thinking a drink of water in a LIVE broadcast may be a signal of something about to be said...or just said.
The FIJI bottle was the first time I saw a brand name...and POTUS made such a dramatic show of drinking it.

Not the first time this happened either. I picked up on it during this speech.

Right at this moment, I don't think he's making full and proper use of our collective power in either role.

Ank, consider the use of the word "I" in your phrase. Your energy is valuable but you are not in charge of either the group or the entire
multi-density effort. You want to change the narrative to what "you" feel it should be. This effort is a about the entire planet, 7 billion people,
and a lot more frankly, not about educating those Q deniers. There are LIVES at risk in the trenches! Keyboard warriors forget this.

One either supports the effort or simply ignore it, but constantly criticizing it from one singular pov is not unity as needed in this case. Venting,
ranting, pointing out how wrong Q is without seeing how many people may have died today in the liberation movement is not helpful to us all.

It's a Q group. Follow the Q clues that have been very specific about what we are needed for. Unity, support not backseat generaling and doubting the
leaders because they refuse to go on CNN and call out xxx right now.

It's sort of amazing that despite the nonstop barrage of negativity and press, he just hit 50% on
Rasmussen. The media is outing itself more
clearly than ever before. People are obviously tuning out the narrative.

ETA: Dear Leader BHO apparently sat at 45% at this same point in his presidency, despite being pushed as the most beloved president ever by this same
press.

Already done. I looked into that during his other speech where he paused to open the bottle to signal us. The water was Fiji as well.
Human trafficking in Fiji

I wonder if this might somehow tie in to Obama's extended vacation in French Polynesia last year? Obama was staying on Tetiaroa (near Tahiti),
formerly owned by Marlon Brando. Given what we've learned recently, I wonder if the "recreational activities" offered there might be similar to what
reportedly goes on at other celebrity-owned private islands (ref. Epstein, Branson).

Funny how Comey and the FBI concluded with "high certainty" that CrowdStrike's review of the hack concluded it was Russian intelligence, even though
the FBI could NOT verify because DNC refused to turn over server, unbelievable !

rowdStrike has figured prominently in the Democratic National Committee cyber attacks and the attribution of those attacks to Russian
intelligence services. On March 20, 2017 during testimony before congress, James Comey stated "CrowdStrike, Mandiant, and ThreatConnect review[ed] the
evidence of the hack and conclude[d] with high certainty that it was the work of APT 28 and APT 29 who are known to be Russian intelligence
services."[20] However, the FBI did not independently verify these findings because the DNC refused to give the FBI access to the
server.[2

Unfortunately my findings about Fiji got buried by something else and most members ignored the new revelations completely. I didn't get any replies to
discuss it further but in light of recent events it seems relevant to mention it again.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

He was busted in JFK airport recently trying to leave the country with a list of American spies

It appears that Q is suggesting "[CROWDSTRIKE]" may be responsible.

Crowdstrike betrayed HRC. Someone inside the team flipped and granted access to the hidden server or cloud for that matter. Release of the missing
emails coming soon?

I agree. To me, Q is suggesting that Crowdstrike (or someone who works there) double-crossed Hillary, and gave the white hats her missing e-mails.

By now it's obvious that Crowdstrike was hired to scrub the server of any incriminating messages/content, and investigating the leak (which they're
still pretending was a hack) was just a pretense. It also seems obvious that the FBI/DOJ must certainly have been aware of this, because there is no
other conceivable reason why they would allow Crowdstrike to perform the "investigation," rather than having competent law-enforcement agencies look
into it.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.