NOVANEWS

HOME SECRETARY MADE “SECRETIVE DEAL TO APPEASE DONALD TRUMP’S LUST FOR BLOOD”, SAYS TOP QC

Embargoed to 0001 Saturday December 01 Home Secretary Sajid Javid during a round table discussion on the Prevent anti-terror scheme, at the Chrisp Street Ideas Store in Poplar, London.

In refusing to seek assurances that the death penalty would not be used on two Islamic State members, the UK abandoned one of its key human rights provisions, says Ben Emmerson.

The Home Secretary Sajid Javid has proved himself to be “unprincipled and unfit to hold one of the great offices of state” after turning the UK’s back on opposing the death penalty, according to an eminent human rights lawyer.

Ben Emmerson QC said that Mr Javid’s decision to provide evidence on two British men, members of the Islamic State, without seeking assurances that they would not be given the death penalty if extradited and convicted by the US, was “immediately and utterly corrosive” to Britain’s reputation on protecting human rights.

El Shafee Elsheikh and Alexanda Kotey were captured by Kurdish forces in Syria in January. Part of a group of British Islamic State members nicknamed the ‘Beatles’, the two men beheaded and tortured a number of British and American hostages, the US believes. Both have now been stripped of their British citizenship.

In a letter to US Attorney General Jeff Sessions in June, Mr Javid said: “I am of the view that there are strong reasons for not requiring a death penalty assurance in this specific case, so no such assurances will be sought.”

Speaking at a lecture hosted by the Howard League for Penal Reform, Mr Emmerson referred to Mr Javid’s decision as an “awful action of collaboration with the swivel-eyed hawks of the Trump administration”.

The UK Government has upheld a principled opposition to use of the death penalty for many years and has sought assurances from foreign governments that suspects will not be executed in cases where the UK agrees to provide information or to extradite them.

Mr Emmerson said Britain had been central to the international abolition agenda and that “progress has been slow but undeniable”.

But that “the leadership role proclaimed by the UK in that campaign ground to a resounding shudder when Sajid Javid allowed himself to be badgered, cajoled and seduced” by Mr Sessions “to abandon one of this country’s core human rights provisions”.

A judicial review brought by the mother of El Shafee Elsheikh was heard earlier this year at the high court, with a judgement expected at a later date.