Smithsonian.com

New Horned Dinosaurs From America's Lost Continent

At the height of the golden era of dinosaur science, it takes something special for a newly described dinosaur species to stand out. Dinosaurs with dual sickle claws, humps, or unexpected bristles more readily grab the attention of the public than more familiar-looking forms, but looks aren't eve...

At the height of the
golden era of dinosaur science, it takes something special for a newly described dinosaur species to stand out. Dinosaurs with
dual sickle claws,
humps, or
unexpected bristles more readily grab the attention of the public than more familiar-looking forms, but looks aren't everything. A pair of horned dinosaurs described today in
PLoS One are noteworthy for reasons that go beyond their strange appearances.

A few months ago, I was fortunate enough to visit the Utah Museum of Natural History's paleontology field crew at their camp in southern Utah's Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. The arid, rocky landscape was rich in dinosaur fossils, but 75 million years ago this same place would have looked very different. During that time in earth's history, near the close of the Cretaceous, a shallow sea over the center of North America divided the landmass into two separate continents: Appalachia to the east and Laramidia to the west. The area which is today Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument was in the middle of the thin western continent, and according to
Scott Sampson, University of Utah paleontologist and lead author of the new paper, the place was "a wet, swampy setting akin to present-day northern Louisiana." Crocodiles, turtles, and at least 16 unique species of dinosaurs thrived here, including the two horned dinosaurs announced today.

Named
Utahceratops gettyi and
Kosmoceratops richardsoni, respectively, the two dinosaurs belonged to a subdivision of the horned dinosaur family called chasmosaurines. Roughly speaking, this group of horned dinosaurs can often be identified by their large brow horns and their wide, squared-off frills, and both
Utahceratops and
Kosmoceratops fit the classic chasmosaurine type. Nevertheless, both were distinct from species previously recognized and were significantly different from each other. While
Utahceratops had relatively short brow horns in front of a large frill that was slightly indented inwards along its top margin, the slightly smaller
Kosmoceratops had longer brown horns and an array of spikes that spilled forwards over its frill like a chasmosaurine comb-over.

In contrast to more familiar chasmosaurines like
Triceratops, though, the browhorns in both
Utahceratops and
Kosmoceratops were oriented out to the side rather than forward. Why this should be so is unclear. Co-author
Andrew Farke of the Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology says, "it's hard to know for sure, but in modern horned animals horn orientation usually relates to horn function." Perhaps
Utahceratops and
Kosmoceratops had similar styles of combat with members of their own species, Farke hypothesizes, or maybe the peculiarity was inherited in both from a common ancestor. Likewise, according to Sampson, the sideways orientation of these horns is also seen in another horned dinosaur from Coahuila, Mexico, and may be a common characteristic of chasmosaurines from this part of Laramidia. Among these dinosaurs, "the sideways-oriented horns offer another means to lock heads and engage in contests of dominance," Sampson says; "they would also have made effective visual signals, particularly in
Kosmoceratops."

Utahceratops and
Kosmoceratops were also very different from the horned dinosaurs that lived in the same area a few million years earlier. While both of the new dinosaurs came from the Kaiparowits Formation, horned dinosaurs of a different sort have been found in the national monument's 80-million-year-old Wahweap Formation. These older dinosaurs, such as the many-horned
Diabloceratops, belonged to another branch of the horned dinosaur family tree called the
centrosaurines. "If you were to line up the skulls side by side," Farke says, "they would look strikingly different!" especially since the two newly described dinosaurs had relatively larger and more ornamented frills.

Given the degree of completeness of both dinosaurs (entire skulls for both, the majority of the skeleton of
Utahceratops, and the skeleton except the tail, feet, and forelimbs in
Kosmoceratops), their description is a major contribution to our understanding of ceratopsid anatomy and diversity. What makes them especially noteworthy, however, is that they confirm the existence of disparate pockets of dinosaur evolution along the western continent of Laramidia. These genera were not evenly spread from Mexico to Canada, but were distinct from the horned dinosaurs that lived at the same time in the northern part of the continent. This is not just an accident of sampling, the authors of the new study propose, but a signal of a real biogeographical phenomenon.

The picture that emerges from the distribution of the horned dinosaurs around 75 million years ago is that there were at least two separate centers of chasmosaurine evolution on the western continent. Where there were
Chasmosaurus, the recently-described
Mojoceratops and
Vagaceratops (previously
Chasmosaurus irvinensis, but renamed by the authors of this study) to the north,
Utahceratops,
Kosmoceratops and
Pentaceratops lived in the far south. Based on the distribution of these dinosaurs in space and time, Sampson, Farke and their colleagues propose that about 77 million years ago there was a barrier that separated chasmosaurines in the north from those in the south. This barrier would have precipitated the divergent evolution of the northern and southern groups identified in the study, though the close relationship of
Kosmoceratops and
Vagaceratops found by the scientists suggests that these dinosaurs shared a close common ancestor that spread after this impediment was removed about 75.7 million years ago. As Sampson states by e-mail, the recognition of this patten raises some important questions about dinosaur evolution on Laramidia:

The implications of this finding huge, given that Laramidia was a landmass about one-third the size of present day North America, and much of this area was likely off limits to large dinosaurs because of large mountain ranges to the west. Today we have a handful of rhino-to-elephant sized mammals living on Africa. At present, it seems that there were at least 15-20 rhino-to-elephant sized animals living on Laramidia 76 million years ago, despite the fact that it was less than one-fifth the size of Africa. How did so many species of giants co-exist on such a small chunk of land? The answer may relate to available fodder (more biomass than at present) and/or to metabolic rates (slower in dinosaurs than in mammals). Either way, these finding suggest that the hothouse world of dinosaurs was, at least in some respects, very different than the one we know today.

Furthermore, if the pattern of evolution in these horned dinosaurs really was influenced by the existence of an ancient barrier, then the same signs of isolation should be seen among other dinosaurs, as well. Hadrosaurs and tyrannosaurs probably would have been isolated in the same way, and the discovery and description of additional dinosaurs from Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument will be pivotal in further tests of this idea. Determining just what the barrier might have been, though, is another mystery. At present there is no sign of an actual physical barrier, though the authors of the new study suggest a previously-unidentified mountain range, temporary flooding by the nearby sea, a turbulent river system, or some kind of ecological barrier as possibilities.

The story of Laramidia will not be resolved by one paper alone, but will take years of study by many paleontologists. This is a good thing. Through something as simple as the description of two dinosaurs, paleontologists have placed the fauna of an entire lost continent in a new context, and, armed with a new set of questions, paleontologists can return to the strata of southern Utah in search of answers.

Smithsonian.com Shop

The Smithsonian Institution has entered affiliate agreements with the companies listed in our holiday shop, and earns a fee for every purchase made from following any link from these gift guide pages and making a purchase on the affiliate site. This fee helps fund Smithsonian’s activities.

The Chemistry Between Us: Love, Sex, and the Science of Attraction [Larry Young PhD, Brian Alexander] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. How much control do we have over love? Much less than we like to think. All that mystery, all that poetry

The spectacular sights of the cosmos are now as easy to see as the stars above, with the 18 lavishly illustrated lectures of A Visual Guide to the Universe, produced in partnership with the Smithsonian. Orbit Saturn, search for water and life on Mars, and witness an armada of space telescopes uncovering the secrets of the cosmos.