Jeremy Hunt MP

Jeremy Hunt MP is Secretary of State for Health and MP for South-West Surrey. Follow Jeremy on Twitter.

Every day, all over the country, patients are failed by the disgracefully inadequate condition of IT across the health and care sector. They deserve better – as do the staff who are working tirelessly to care for them. Last year we set the NHS a challenge of going paperless by 2018. Today I have announced £1 billion of new investment in IT.

The appalling condition of much of the current IT infrastructure is not just a huge burden on NHS finances. It threatens patient safety, frustrates staff and is an unnecessary pressure on A&E departments. It is shocking to hear stories of elderly dementia patients turning up at A&E with no-one able to access their medical history. Meanwhile terrible mistakes can occur when patients are given drugs they don’t need or may be allergic to because their paper notes have been lost. Nurses and patients fill in umpteen forms with the same information because the same hospital may have a dozen or so electronic systems. District nurses have to spend time filling in notes and travelling to and from the office when they could be seeing patients.

Jeremy Hunt MP is Secretary of State for Health and MP for South-West Surrey. Follow Jeremy on Twitter.

Patient safety must be established as the most important priority in our NHS. That is the central conclusion of the excellent report published yesterday by world-renowned expert, Professor Don Berwick. As the events in Mid-Staffs showed, patient safety and care had become a secondary concern – overcome by financial reporting and a culture of targets at any cost. This is changing - our Government is driving a culture which puts patients first. Never again must we allow the system to take precedence over the individual.

As Professor Berwick notes, the key to this change is the engagement of the tremendous skill and goodwill within the NHS workforce. Our doctors and nurses are the NHS’ greatest asset and provide an outstanding quality of service in the vast majority of places. However, as Professor Berwick notes, we should seek continuous improvement if we are to achieve our vision of zero harm. In all, there were 326 so-called ‘never events’ reported in 2011/12. Work continues, aided by the Berwick report, to end this silent scandal of the NHS.

The shocking
failures at Mid-Staffs and Morecambe Bay hospitals show the terrible
consequences of lax safety and a culture of secrecy - two linked and mutually
reinforcing problems. In a speech today at University College London Hospital,
I am setting out how we break the cycle. Those of us who passionately believe
in the values of the NHS and the skill of its staff are often best-placed to
speak up where we know it can do better for its vulnerable patients.

The first duty of
every hospital should be to do the sick no harm. The NHS’ record on patient
safety is strong by international comparison but is it as good as it should be?
Julie Bailey, James Titcombe and other brave campaigners who have lost their
loved ones know the answer to that question is unequivocally "No."

In too many
corners of our NHS, we have become so numbed to the inevitability of patient
harm that we accept the unacceptable. Labour’s obsession with top-down targets
and process requirements fostered a culture which too often neglected the
individual and concealed failure. Only by ensuring that every person is treated
as though they were our own family member will be realise the ambition of zero
harm. And only by shining a light on poor performance will we confront
negligence and neglect.

Over time, grim
fatalism about statistics has blunted the anger we should feel about every
single person we let down. Figures show 0.4% of people treated suffered
unnecessary harm and 0.003% ended with a person’s death. This is a tiny
proportion, but still amounts to nearly half a million people harmed
unnecessarily every year, 3000 of whom lost their lives. That’s more than eight
patients dying needlessly every single day - deaths occurring not despite our
best efforts, but as a direct result of our failures.

Jeremy Hunt is the Secretary of State for Health and MP for Surrey South-West

Across departments, this Government continues to grasp and confront the long term challenges. Nowhere are these more acute than in healthcare, which has to face not just constrained finances but the massive challenge of an ageing society. Last week, I set out how rediscovering the traditional role of the family doctor would be critical if we are to look after our growing elderly population with dignity and respect.

Much of my recent focus has been on hospital care, addressing the terrible failures identified by the Francis report on Mid Staffs hospital, where Labour's targets-at-any-cost culture led to appalling neglect and cruelty towards vulnerable patients. The new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, starting later this year, will ensure through strict, independent and public Ofsted-style ratings that no hospital can be judged as excellent unless it offers the highest standards of compassionate care.

Anyone who
has been to an A&E department in recent weeks will know that they are under
pressure. A million more people a year are going through the doors compared
with Labour’s last year in office.

Some of the root causes stem from decisions
we inherited, like the changes to the GP contract in 2004 which led to a decline
in the quality and availability of out of hours care. Falling ill at evenings
or weekends shouldn’t necessarily mean a trip to A&E, but in too many cases
it does, reflecting many people’s lack of confidence in their local out of
hours services.

But it is not just about the number of patients
going to A&E – the cases are often more complex too. This is particularly
true for frail older patients with long term conditions like dementia. A fall
at home might lead to a hospital admission. But because of the barriers between
hospitals and social care, arranging the discharge of an elderly patient can be
a bureaucratic nightmare, causing distress for the patient and adding to the
pressures in hospitals.

Normally I find myself in agreement with much written on ConHome but this morning’s analysis from Paul Goodman was unusually wide of the mark. Labour can and will be held accountable for what happened at Mid Staffs. But the time to do it is now, when David Nicholson has given his evidence and we are in full knowledge of what he did – and what was the responsibility of Ministers.

Let me start by saying I agree with Robert Francis that the primary responsibility for what went wrong lies with the board and management of Mid Staffs Hospital. We should not scapegoat individuals outside the hospital for what went wrong. He also said – which I accept – that Ministers at the time were not personally responsible for what happened.

But Labour ministers did make three catastrophic policy mistakes for which they bear direct responsibility – all of which are having a direct impact on the lack of compassionate care in parts of the NHS today.

Jeremy Hunt is the Member of Parliament for South West Surrey and Secretary of State for Health. Follow Jeremy on Twitter.

As Conservatives, doing the right thing for people who have
worked hard and saved all their lives is a top priority. Every year more than
30,000 people have to sell their homes to pay for the cost of care. The current
system, which only provides state support if your assets are above £23,250, is
unfair and sends out completely the wrong message – that if you work hard, save
for your future and want to have something to pass on to your loved ones, your
savings can disappear in a puff of smoke if you end up needing long term care.
As one in three of us will get dementia and one in ten end up with more than
£100,000 of care costs, this is a problem a responsible government cannot
ignore.

So my new reform package includes from 2017:

A cap on care costs at
£75,000. The intention is not that people should pay the £75,000, but that they should not have to pay it because they can cover it through,
say, an option in their pension plan. Only with the certainty of knowing
there is an upper limit to costs will pension companies or insurance
companies offer this.

Jeremy Hunt is the Member of Parliament for South West Surrey and Secretary of State for Health. Follow Jeremy on Twitter.

Robert Francis QC’s report into the appalling
failures of care at Mid Staffordshire Hospital must mark a turning point for
our NHS. It lays bare the dreadful neglect and mistreatment suffered by
hundreds of patients between 2005 and 2009. It is truly shocking to read just
how comprehensive the failures were right across the system – from ward to
Whitehall. Hospital staff, managers, regulators and politicians all failed. It
took the courage and determination of the families who had suffered so terribly
to get the truth out.

I will need to study carefully all 290 recommendations before outlining our
full response but as the Prime Minister said in his statement yesterday, the
report makes some fundamental points about the culture of the NHS which apply
well beyond one hospital. This needs to be a ‘never again’ moment for the whole
health service.

It is clear from the report that a large driver for the awful events at Mid
Staffs was the Board’s pursuit of Foundation Trust status under the last Labour
Government, which led to a narrow focus on finance and targets at the expense
of patients. It cannot be right for a Board to be more concerned with targets
and finances than giving the most basic dignity and respect to patients. So we
will create a single failure regime where the suspension of the Board can be
triggered by failures in care as much as by failures in finance.

Jeremy Hunt is the Member of Parliament for South West Surrey and Secretary of State for Health. Follow Jeremy on Twitter.

Sometimes an opposition makes a transition from opposition for opposition's
sake to being a government-in-waiting. That is the moment of maximum danger for
a government seeking re-election. However, Labour's reaction to my decision on
Lewisham hospital last week shows they are going headlong in the opposite
direction.

A simple look at the facts would tell you this was a problem over which they should
have shown some humility.

South London Healthcare Trust was set up under the last Government to solve
long-standing financial problems. Instead, they left it with a deficit of around
£65m per annum - more than £1m every week being drained from frontline
services to support a deficit. Two PFIs signed by Labour between them account
for around £60m of cost every year in the Trust.

The solution I proposed did not involve the closure of Lewisham A & E,
although that was on the table. But it does remove the deficit, meaning that
money can go back into frontline patient care. It also saves around 100 lives a
year by concentrating the care for a few more complex conditions - pneumonia,
meningitis, broken hips - in specialist hospitals nearby. This was what Labour
did with stroke care, reducing the number of London hospitals dealing with
strokes from 32 to 8 and halving the stroke mortality rate in the process.

Jeremy Hunt is the Member of Parliament for South West Surrey and Secretary of State for Health. Follow Jeremy on Twitter.

I have now been Health Secretary for just over two months. I said when I was appointed that it was the biggest privilege of my life. The remarkable people I have met working for the NHS makes me think I was right. I am a strong supporter of Andrew Lansley's reforms, which will unlock ideas, energy and enthusiasm at the NHS front line. But there are other things that need doing too, and I have identified four key priorities to focus on as Health Secretary.

So how do I want the NHS to change for the better between now and the general election?

Improve the standard of care throughout the system.Last week's CQC report was sober reading. 10% of health and social care institutions inspected fail to offer basic dignity and care. We need a system where quality of care is considered as important as quality of treatment. Much of the system gets this right and I have seen some brilliant things in my short time in office - but Mid Staffs, Winterbourne View, Morecambe Bay, James Paget, East Surrey...there are too many examples of places where this has not happened. We need more accountability from managers, better training, tougher inspections and more attention paid to what patients say.

Bring the technology revolution to the NHS. The way we use technology has profoundly changed society. But the NHS has not kept pace. Patients, especially those with long term conditions like diabetes, want more joined-up care and much of the solution is in better use and sharing of information. We don’t need a top-down, multi-billion pound programme to do this - but Labour's failure to deliver must not mean the NHS puts its head in the sand with respect to technology. We do need the kind of common sense that begins to knit local IT systems together so that when an ambulance is called for a frail older person, the paramedics know in advance if they have dementia. Or so that community health staff get an alert when a diabetes patient hasn’t had a home visit for a long time.

Radically improve treatment and care of dementia. There are 670,000 people with dementia in England today – and that figure is going to double within 30 years. For far too long, people with dementia and their carers have not received the care and support they deserve. With our ageing population that must change. More early diagnosis, better research and better support for carers are essential if the NHS is to offer decent, humane support in line with its founding values.

Improve mortality rates for the big killer diseases to be the best in Europe. One of the most basic elements of a good health system is how well it helps people get better, yet we languish in the lower half of the European league tables for cancer survival rates, respiratory and many other diseases. We should be the best - and if we were 20,000 lives would be saved every year. I want the NHS to make measurable progress towards this goal over the next 3 years.

A lot of this is a big ask when there are so many other pressures on the system. But if we don't aim to be the best in the world, we never will be and I want nothing less from our NHS.

Jeremy Hunt MP is Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. Follow Jeremy on Twitter.

We can never be complacent with such a huge event, but it looks like London 2012 has been a magnificent success.

Not success that belongs to any one person, organisation or political party, but what happens when we come together as a country.

Here’s my take on how we’ve done:

Volunteers

Thanks to 70,000+ brilliant volunteers, we have knocked on the head the idea we are not a friendly country. The courteousness, helpfulness, enthusiasm and smiles from people of all ages and all backgrounds has truly made these Olympics. We are a volunteering nation - as enthusiasts for the Big Society have long argued - and now we have proved it.

I can sum up our sports policy in three words: more competitive sport.

By banishing once and for all the left-wing orthodoxy that promotes "prizes for all" and derides competitio,n we allow sport to do what it does best of all: teach children to learn about how to cope with both success and failure - and most importantly, learn to pick yourself up when things don't go according to plan.

Today we passed an important milestone in that policy, because 8,000 schools have signed up to our School Games - one third of the schools in the country. This Olympic-style school sports competition means will harness the excitement of next year's games to create thousands of opportunities to play competitive sport up and down the country - and because it will continue every year after 2012, it will be a real sporting legacy.

Since becoming Culture Secretary I have at times been a lone voice in arguing that broadcasting in this country is far too centralised. Most major cities in the US and Canada have 6 local TV stations or affiliates but it isn't just across the Atlantic. France has 40 local TV stations and Sweden has 80 - compared to the UK where we have just one in Manchester and none in major cities like London, Birmingham, Bristol and Leeds.

Here are three reasons why this is not just something "nice to have" but vital to our localist agenda:

1. It will transform local democracy Think how the leadership debates transformed the General Election. Those of us knocking on doors noticed a startling change: cynicism and apathy were replaced by engagement and interest. We should jump at the chance to transform local democracy in the same way. It isn't just local politicians who could be held to account - locally-elected police chiefs, the new GP commissioning groups and any service delivered with a high degree of local control could be scrutinised properly in a way that simply isn't possible in five minutes of regional news.

2. It will regenerate local economiesLocal TV will be a whole new sector of the creative industries, creating jobs throughout the country. But it isn't just the jobs directly created. If you start a new restaurant, tourist attraction or retail outlet in a big city, the ability to advertise locally is essential. But until now we have prevented local businesses using the most powerful medium there is. Local TV will change this, making it much easier for entrepreneurs to get businesses off the ground. Incidentally the need for a powerful new local advertising platform is one reason why I do not believe the BBC should deliver local TV.

3. To devolve power to local communities we also need to devolve control of local mediaThe media is incredibly important in shaping society. We will not succeed in our localist objectives if we do not also relax the centralised grip of the London media on the way local issues are portrayed. If you look at local TV affiliates in Boston, they also have national and international news - but read to you by someone in your city. The Big Society is about harnessing the energy, enthusiasm and ideas of individual citizens to achieve shared social purposes - the media needs to play its part.

The London Olympics has been a project with cross-party support right from the outset. Hugh Robertson went to Singapore as part of the bid team in 2005, carrying with him an endorsement from Michael Howard. This was critical to the success of the bid, because the International Olympic Committee needed to know that any decision to choose London would survive a change of government. Seb Coe was more responsible for the success of the bid than any other single person except perhaps Tony Blair, who deserves credit for personally flying to Singapore to lobby IOC delegates.

So this is not a project from which any party should try to derive political advantage. Like the Royal Wedding and Diamond Jubilee that precede it, it will be a national occasion. Latest figures suggest a quarter of UK adults want to go (three quarters of which are from outside London), making it comfortably the biggest sporting event in our history.

It will also be the first time in our history we have staged an event watched live by more than half the world's population - an extraordinary opportunity to show the world Britain at its best. So I have given the tourist industry the challenge of producing the best ever marketing campaign for the UK - and they have risen to it by doubling the amount of money the government puts into tourism marketing with the ambition of getting an additional 2 million foreign visitors to come to the UK post 2012. At the same time, there will be an massive economic boost to East London. What used to be the dumping ground for the capital's waste, with 75% of the land contaminated with tar, petrol, oil and arsenic, will be transformed into East London Tech City which has already secured commitment to invest by companies like Cisco, Google, Vodafone, Facebook and Intel.

Today Jeremy Hunt MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, looks at the contribution of sport to patriotic renewal.

Last Sunday’s Ashes victory was a feel-good moment that we really needed. Even the outrage over the release of the Lockerbie bomber was pushed briefly off the front pages as the nation was gripped with excitement. The Today programme gloatingly reported the depressed coverage in Australia – but when it is the Aussies we are allowed to gloat aren’t we? Meanwhile our victorious sportsmen, perhaps remembering the post 2005 disappointment, behaved with great dignity and aplomb.

It has not always been easy to be proud of sport in Britain. Last week's violence at Upton Park was an ugly reminder that only a few years back football hooliganism was a massive blight on our sporting reputation. Let's hope swift action by the footballing authorities makes what happened a one-off - as well as a reminder we can never be complacent.

A country’s characteristics are often reflected in the way their play sport. Australian doggedness was perfectly exemplified by their resistance on Sunday. Brazilian flair flows through their football team. For many Andrew Strauss typified British decency in the way he reacted to victory at the Ashes.

If sport defines nations, at its best it also unites them.

You only have to look at the response to our athletes’ stunning success in Beijing last year to see how sport lifts a nation. Sporting glory inspire even those who normally have no interest in sport at all. How else can you explain the cult status accorded to Olympic athletes winning in sports that so few people take part in or even normally watch?