Welcome to the Piano World Piano ForumsOver 2 million posts about pianos, digital pianos, and all types of keyboard instruments
Join the World's Largest Community of Piano Lovers
(it's free)
It's Fun to Play the Piano ... Please Pass It On!

I hope this is a valid question:Given the choice between a 1989 Baldwin "Classic" spinet and a Kimball "Artist's" console upright (unknown year), which has the better reputation? Both are in great condition and similar in price. Thanks!

If it is a recent Kimball studio (45") or the larger upright, then I would go for it. Actually, I would probably even prefer an Artists Console, opting for a piano that may not be quite the quality, but is easier to maintain well. There is a Baldwin Howard spinet which I have seen which is particularly bad, worse than any Kimball I have ever seen.

Thanks, BDB. The Kimball is a 42" Artist Console built in 1958, and seems to be in good shape. I read that Kimball sold its company in 1959, does this mean quality may have been poor just before the sale? I was also told that this 42" piano would be easier to resell someday vs. a spinet - any thoughts?

I kind of like Artist Consoles, but they are not great pianos. The later ones with Schwander actions are better. I recommend that you wait around and find a nice studio. Read this topic to see how it is done.

I tuned a 1958 Kimball console today that was awful - The strings hung up, the pin block rocked, the scale and harmonics were dreadful. Took over 1 1/2 hours. But then again, some Kimball pianos are just fine. Have a tech check both pianos.

I agree with having a tech check it out...originally I was hesitant due to the cost, but it's better than getting stuck with a lemon. Thanks for the advice! I know the Artist console is not the best, but for $700 can I really do much better?