GLOBAL WARMING - THE MYTH AND THE FEEBLE FACT

An alternative view on global warming - causes and evidence.
Ghia theory.
Is sit only human endeavor- Is this naieve

Submitted:Oct 5, 2008
Reads: 131
Comments: 0
Likes: 0

The most popular thesis fro glabal warming currently is of course
Co2 emissions as a consequence of human endeavors ; in all their
diverse manifestations from industry to human and animal
metabolism but there is a believe which whether we think it to
subversive or just naive it is a counter theory with regard to
the dictum which would hold that our common breathing
/,industry,/to agriculture etc - all human generated activity or
all biological organic and inorganic activity which human beings
generate and participate in causing Co2 and thus cause global
warming ; factored in to this Co2 emmissions is the is particle
pollutant causing the insulation effect.
These two it is commonly held among the scientific community are
responsible fro the entire effect we have monitored ib climate
change most especially over the past 2 decades .

But less pleasing is the notion that global warming and thus our
mortality as a species is occurring for reasons not of our making
; that these factors are inevitable and thus fatalistic somehow
offends the human psyche .
There are 2 counter theories to these and they are to a degree
also counterintuitive,
1./
that the earth is actually dimming from lack of solar radiation
penetrating the atmosphere because of particle occlusion -
pollutants in the upper and lower atmosphere- less penetration of
sunlight /energy- which should cause global dimming thus cooling
.
2./
The reverse of this is that all of the pollutants , from Co2 to
CFC s and a litany of others cause the canopy / umbrella effect
causing warming.

The theory which i'm grappling with at the moment is the one
which suggests that global warming /cooling is unrelated to Co2
or human interference but rather that it is caused by cosmic
radiation. If I have this correctly the theory would suggest that
the sun and its magnetic field is in a state of flux; constantly
changing both the strength and force of its magnetic field , but
changing with a periodic regularity.In the quiescent phase the
mangetic field is less active and therfore is incapable of
deflecting cosmic radiation which enters the atmosphere causing
ionic particles ( chlorine )which eventually coalesce and form
the substrate for droples of H2o - ; hence clouds are formed and
these deflect the suns rays and cause the earth to cool; the
obverse occurs when the suns magnetic field is more active - the
cosmic radiation is attracted by the sun's gravitational

This theory , so its proponents would hold , is supported by the
dendrologists who it is sugested support this in terms of
alternating spurts of growth and dormancy which they observe in
the the rings of trees,and they attest that these periods of
extended and retarded growth correspond with the Sun Spots.
The theory holds that the sun displays black spots on a regular
and periodic frequency , and that these spots represent solar
magma erupting from the center of the sun causing a powerful
change in the force of the suns gravity and a reversal of the
magnetic field in the region of the sun spot.( Black Spot)
We are apparently now emerging from a period of activity -less
black spots-less interference /deflection of cosmic radiation so
the earth should be warming.
The theory holds that more black spots ( increased magnetic solar
activity ) = more deflection of cosmic radiation = less
ionization = less cloud = less occlusion =Global Warming
The proponents of this theory would suggest that the last Mini
Ice age occurred as a consequence of a change in the Solar
magnetic fields .(inactivity.) many of them over it's vast
surface causing less deflection of cosmic radiation - more
ionization- more H2o precipitation..more cloud..more occlusion ..
cooling.
This Mini Ice age is depicted in Dickens with people skating on
the Thames which is frozen over ..
Some would go so far with this theory but come to the reverse
conclusions ie more black spots = less solar radiation =less
heat/ energy reaching earth =cooler earth ; So no one is really
convinced that this is a viable thesis other than to admit that
cosmic radiation exists and that solar wind exists and that a
degree of ionization does occur from cosmic radiation , but the
results of any research seems inconclusive and as yet
unconvincing.

So there's my quandry .GW - who dunnit !
But Ive left out the Ghia belief which holds that the earth is
just a single organism - like a coral reef - in which we ( humans
) are just participants ; And this belief holds that the earth
has a capacity , as do all living things , to reorganize itself ,
regenerate and heal.And that it orchestrates these biological
expediencies for its own protection. For example it is suggested
that the earth 'allows ' certain marine organisms to proliferate
- the red tide- to cause release of gases to - and here I'm vague
- is it to augment the depleted ozone layer and protect these
organisms form ultra violet radiation and additionally allow the
organisms to thrive , cause Co2 release , cloud to cause cloud
formation or to cause Co2 formation - cloud - cooling etc.Then
again would not the greenhouse effect prevail and cause
warming?
Like all theories once you posit it you have to take the flak of
subjecting it to scrutiny and analysis ; empirical evidence is
scanty .
It seems that here more than anywhere else that the Chaos Theory
( forget macro enocomics)prevails and nothing ultimately can be
predictable because all of the contributing factors and their
interactions and the sequellae of these reactions and
interactions are unknown or as yet undetermined , or are perhaps
unknowable and thus utterly unpredictable.

So whether GW is due to our collective breathing , farting ,
burning , working , manufacturing , farming or whether its just
an inevitable cyclical thing related to a state of flux in the
suns magnetic fields or whether Ghia will nurse itself back to
rude good health again despite continuous anthropomorphically
perceived insult - its all to play for and indeed pay for.
I would welcome any inforamtive view on any opf this . I am
inured to ridicule or satire but if you must ..

There would have to be a counter theory to all of the above and
to quote the greatest and most lovable of chaoists - Groucho
Markx - the reverse of all of the above could of be equally true
.
And then of course there's God , the perfidity of the human
condition; original sin , third secret of Fatima ..GW Bush..CIA
FBI ..BBC..BB Kink Matt Buzby ..and Digg it.. digg it.. Dorris
Day..- John Lennon