Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ. Jones, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Author: Per Curiam

[ 461 Pa. Page 436]

ORDER

And now to wit this 13th day of May 1975, it is hereby ordered and decreed that the above-captioned matter is remanded to the lower court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether appellant knowingly and intelligently waived her right to file and argue post-trial motions.

If the court determines that there has been no waiver then the judgment of sentence shall be vacated and post-trial motions allowed. The right of either party to appeal adverse rulings as to all issues properly raised in

[ 461 Pa. Page 437]

the instant appeal, including the finding regarding waiver of post-trial motions, is preserved.

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.