"Congress is the Key"
ALSO VISIT
http://targetfreedom.com/

Tip Jar

Donate

Recommended Yahoo Groups

The Constitution Enforcement AllianceThe focus of this board is to have a place to bring to the attention of it's members any purported abuse of our fellow Countrymen as they attempt to exercise their natural birthrights as guaranteed by the Constitution. Once brought to light these abuses can be further investigated and if they are found factual we MUST act in any way we are capable. Be it food, shelter, protection, money or whatever else is required to ensure that aid is given where and when needed so that Patriots, like all of us on this board and others, can, in fact, continue to enjoy Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. And in so doing, preserve it for ourselves and our fellow Countrymen.

Citizens' Constitutional Command Center The Citizens' Constitutional Command Center-USA is organized and established as the Official Office of the United States Constitution and its People, as their Steward and Guardian, to ensure the future safety and security of American citizens in all states of the nation from ALL enemies, domestic or foreign.

falseaccusationsFor people who want to stop the growing trend towards using false accusations of domestic abuse, sexual harrassment, etc. to destroy lives and take property, children, and rights

AnswerToTheGreatestQuestionWe have been told for centuries that no one has ever PROVEN the existence of a Supreme Being. We have been told for centuries that IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE the existence of a Supreme Being. Those who think that these assertions are true, have not read "The Answer To The Greatest Question"
Group email address: AnswerToTheGreatestQuestion@yahoogroups.com

JBirch LeadersGroup volunteer leaders and John Birch Society staff to share ideas and projects to help carry out the monthly bulletin agenda.

JBirch This list is intended for members of; or individuals who are interested in pursuing the action agenda of the John Birch Society.

Tea Party CoalitionThe power to tax is the power to destroy.
We are "Taxed Enough Already" and TEA'd off.
End the Federal Reserve and the IRS
Group email address: TeaPartyCoalition@yahoogroups.com

Uploaded with written
permissionfrom the producer, Ben Swann.Visit his
web page at http://benswann.com/

Monsanto, and the government agencies that
regulate Monsanto, are linked like a revolving door: with individuals rotating
between working for one, and then working for the other. In short, the fox is
guarding the hen house.

Monsanto is most known for GMO foods.
Genetically modified foods are believed to be unsafe by many people, and are
strictly regulated in many countries, but not in the United States. Labeling
foods as genetically modified is required in 64 other countries, but not in the
United States.

In the United States Monsanto is given the
right to patent seeds, and to require farmers to buy new seeds every year.
Saving seeds from a previous crop is prohibited by law. Farmers have even been
required to destroy their OWN seeds, because Monsanto Genetically modified seeds
mysteriously contaminated their fields, and became mingled with their own seeds.
When this happens the unmodified, and natural seeds, that may have been the
result of generations of selection is simply destroyed under the color of law.

On Friday, September 20, the U.S.
House of Representatives passed the Continuing Resolution (H.J.RES.59), which
will keep the government running through December 15. But the Continuing
Resolution also extends the Monsanto Protection Act, which is officially called
the Farmers Assurance Provision. This law gives biotech firms immunity from
federal prosecution for illegally growing GMO crops.

In 2008, when I put out a message like this, the bankers used their power to deal with most of the truth that was being told about them. In 2008 the bankers gave me a very quick response. Within one month of sending that messaage five credit card banks informed me that my accounts had been closed. All of those credit cards were current, and in good standing. I wonder what they will do this time.

If the elitists were to kill Ron Paul this freedom movement would grow 1000 fold, and the corrupt power cartel would fall.

This freedom movement can no longer be stopped by another murder. The lives of the corrupt power cartel would be worth nothing.

The elitists need to watch the news reels of what happened to Mussolini:

The tyrant can be a peacock today, and then be a feather duster tomorrow.

“We were just obeying orders”was the common excuse at Nuremberg.How did that work?

Estulin told commentator Alex Jones: "I am getting information from my sources that there are people involved from a higher level of the American establishment who are seriously considering - this has not been confirmed - but assassination is definitely on the agenda and I pray to God that this is not the case."

How many have the globalists killed?

How many have the globalists tried to kill?

Do YOUR OWN research on just a few of these names:Larry McDonald, Andy Jackson, President James Garfield, Huey Long, John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Anastasio Somoza,Vince Foster, Abraham Lincoln, Benazir Bhutto and Ron Brown.

Of course, as soon as one of these murders occurred, The New World Order's propaganda machine always spun out the story about the "lone fanatic".

If they think that anyone believed that story, then they must think that the story is believable. So how many "lone fanatics" are really out there?

DEAR GLOBALIST:

There is a big difference this time.

Ron Paul's supporters know who you are. They have your names, addresses, and pictures. There are millions of them now. Even Ron Paul does not control them. They are passionate. Some of them are even fanatical.

Losing a fair, honestly counted, election would be a disappointment. Losing our hero to another murder would awaken a sleeping giant like nothing that the world has ever seen before. Then another leader would take his place, and would then lead an even larger freedom movement.

Ron Paul's supporters essentially control the internet, and the internet can mobilize the whole world in a few hours. Ron Paul has supporters all around the world. Can you imagine a New World Order member locator web page, where people could enter a zip code and locate their local NWO members? There are even a few governments that are not controlled by the New World Order. It was once said that the pen is mightier than the sword. Now we say that the keyboard is mightier than the gun; but then again, the people have both of these. The Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment in case we ever needed to defend our freedoms.

Ron Paul's supporters can raise millions of dollars in a single day, when they are not angry. What would happen if they were angry? Did you consider this when you were discussing the killing of Ron Paul?

Most of the military personnel support Ron Paul. Those military guys are very patriotic and very well trained. It might not be a good idea to make a few thousand Marines angry. The same is true of the retired military. Did you consider this when you were discussing the killing of Ron Paul? Sleep well.

The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline

————————————-Security guards abuse their “power” in front of a full stadium

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws-mn3M23dc&NR=1Four Security guards decided to unnecessarily beat up a protester, after he was already subdued. The fans in the stadium apparently did not agree with this conduct. They swarm the field and show these bullies how it feels. Tyranny like any other types of bullying is usually based on bluff. The people can prevail.

Sometimes we can learn a lot about nature by watching other creatures. Victims tend to fear the bullies until they get mad enough to resist. The video below shows a large pride of lions ganging up on the smallest water buffalo calf.Watch what happens when the whole herd gets mad enough to fight back.The most powerful force on earth is an idea whose time has come. Sometimes the little people rise up and take their country back from a corrupt powerful elite. There comes a time when even the herd mentality says that the predatory abuse, and oppression, have gone too far.That is when legends are born.

Have you thought about the effect of uniting all of the patriots by giving us a common enemy? You do everything that you can do to divide us, and to get us to fight each other. What would it be like if all the patriots suddenly turned on the real masterminds of tyranny?

Thomas Jefferson said: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

Watch the faces of the nervous CFR members, while Ron Paul speaks! Ron Paul was very kind to them. He could have pointed out that Ron Paul was the only candidate on that stage who was not a member of the CFR.

Let us be clear about one thing:

Ron Paul, and nearly all of his supporters, abhor violence.

We pray for peace.

We also pray for justice.

We pray that cooler heads will prevail.

The New World Order will be praying too.

The New World Order will be praying, to the devil, that justice is not done.

A movie by Alex Jones (click on link below). It is a documentary about the plan for the one world government, population control and the enslavement of all the middle and lower class people. It's about 2:20 hrs. long but well worth the time. Only massive understanding of the information presented here will preserve liberty. There is actual footage of Bilderbergers arriving at meetings.

December 25, 2011

Gingrich and Perry fail to qualify for Va. primary ballot. Bachmann, Santorum and Huntsman did not even try to qualify?

WHEN THE ONLY SUPPORTERS THAT A CANDIDATE HAS ARE BANKERS, CORPORATIONS, LOBBYISTS, AND ELECTRONIC VOTE COUNTING MACHINES IT IS HARD TO MEET A REQUIREMENT FOR SIGNATURES ON PETITIONS.

Virginia is approximately 10% of the Super Tuesday Vote so that is a significant number. Does this not explain WHY Ron Paul is electable, WHY he CAN Win; And WHY Gingrich, Perry, Bachmann, Santorum and Huntsman are NOT electable and CAN'T win? YES VIRGINIA, THE PEOPLE WANT TO BE FREE.

(12-24) 17:41 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich failed to qualify for Virginia's Super Tuesday primary ballot, the latest setback for a candidate whose standing in polls has been slipping. Gingrich's campaign said he would pursue an aggressive write-in campaign, though state law prohibits write-ins on primary ballots.

The state party said early Saturday that Gingrich and Texas Gov. Rick Perry had failed to submit the required 10,000 signatures to appear on the March 6 ballot. Failing to get on the ballot in Virginia, where Gingrich lives, underscores the difficulty first-time national candidates have in preparing for the long haul of a presidential campaign.Romney's team, larger than those of most of his opponents, has paid close attention to filing requirements in each state. He will appear on the Virginia ballot along with Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who also has run a national campaign before.

Three other candidates — Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman — did not submit signatures before Virginia's deadline of 5 p.m. Thursday.Gingrich's campaign attacked Virginia's primary system on Saturday, saying that "only a failed system" would disqualify Gingrich and other candidates and vowing to run a write-in campaign."Voters deserve the right to vote for any top contender, especially leading candidates," Gingrich campaign director Michael Krull said in a statement. "We will work with the Republican Party of Virginia to pursue an aggressive write-in campaign to make sure that all the voters of Virginia are able to vote for the candidate of their choice."However, according to state law, "No write-in shall be permitted on ballots in primary elections.""Virginia code prohibits write-ins in primaries. He can't do it," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at University of Richmond.

Virginia GOP spokesman Garren Shipley said in a statement that volunteers spent Friday validating signatures on petitions that Romney, Paul, Perry and Gingrich had submitted. "After verification, RPV has determined that Newt Gingrich did not submit required 10k signatures and has not qualified for the VA primary," the party announced early Saturday on its Twitter feed.

Gingrich already missed the deadline to appear on the ballot in Missouri's Feb. 7 primary, though he insists it doesn't matter because the state awards delegates based not on the primary but on a Republican caucus held in March.

Falsify the "official" polls to make the fraudulent election believable.

The controlled media will not report polls that disprove the predetermined election results.

The controlled media will propagandize that any actually valid polls should be disregarded. This gets quite amusing sometimes. We even see pundits discrediting their own polls.

At the end of this message you will see an accumulation of polls that these pundits will ignore. These prove that the "official" representations of polls are patently false.

Step Two: Use rigged voting machines to produce election results that agree with the fraudulent polls.

DEMAND PAPER BALLOTS

They can fake some of the polls to make it look as though the elections are real. Then they can even rig the elections with the voting machines.

They are also embarassed by the fact that they cannot assemble a good sized crowd of supporters for New World Order favorites. This is especially important when Ron Paul DOES assemble a good sized crowd of supporters in the same town, at the same time. They have a big problem with requirements for petitions which only allow signatures from certified registered voters.

Votes as of 08:58 AM, 08/12/11

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

AMES, IOWA - August 11, 2011 - Thomas Woods - Once again, Ron Paul distinguished himself in a Republican presidential debate by telling Americans the truth, answering the questions he was asked, and refusing to treat his countrymen like ten-year-olds who should be spoken to in bumper-sticker slogans.

On the economy, everyone talked about lower taxes, cutting spending, and a balanced budget - the usual boilerplate. Only Ron Paul sought to explain why we have recessions in the first place. Only Ron Paul mentioned the critical role of the Federal Reserve System in blowing up the bubbles that have popped in America over the past decade. Only Ron Paul explained that the monetary system we have, whereby money can be created out of thin air whenever the political class wants it, is a recipe for the very kind of disaster we are living through right now.

To be sure, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had some critical words for particular Fed policies, but surely his recent criticism of the Fed is one of the exceedingly rare times, if not the only time, he has made serious mention of the Federal Reserve in over three decades in public life.

The only reason any of them will even talk about the Fed is Ron Paul, who took the issue from the depths of obscurity and turned it into a live issue for the first time in the nearly one hundred years of the Fed's existence.

But where Congressman Paul really stood out, of course, was in foreign policy. He dismissed the comments of the neoconservative former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum as "war propaganda," which indeed Senator Santorum can be relied upon to parrot at every opportunity. He explained that the history of U.S. relations in Iran did not begin with the hostage crisis in 1979, as Senator Santorum tried to pretend. It began with the U.S./British coup in 1953 that brought the oppressive shah to power, and it was resentment over his police state that turned Iranians against the U.S. Before the U.S. government's interventions in the Middle East, Americans had an excellent reputation in that part of the world - another piece of history our political class ignores.

Our delicate ears are not supposed to hear the kinds of things Ron Paul told Americans tonight. We're supposed to hear "USA! USA!" We are supposed to be flattered, told our leaders have infallible judgment, and urged to believe that anyone who questions that judgment, or who thinks anyone around the world might have a legitimate grievance against the American political class, "hates America." Given how many grievances we Americans have with our political class, is it really so hard to imagine that other people might, too?

Everyone on the stage wanted to talk about budgets, but only Ron Paul pointed out that the wars are costing trillions of dollars, with a sixth war being seriously contemplated. This is pure insanity, and the only person who will level with the American people about it is Ron Paul.

It's hard to imagine one person being so consistently and thoroughly vindicated as Congressman Paul. On the economy in particular, he has been warning for decades about the certain outcome of our monetary system and economic policies. The world is now beginning to undergo the exact convulsions he predicted would result.

Ron Paul is the only person on that stage who has the slightest grasp of what is happening in America and around the world right now. All they can do is repeat GOP talking points. Ron Paul knows the economics and the history inside and out.

Dr. Paul, who is often too humble even to say "I," rarely points out in such a setting that he, along among the candidates on stage, had been so prophetic about all this. That is where Revolution PAC comes in. We're not humble at all. We intend to brag about Ron Paul like crazy. It is a scandal that Americans could even consider another candidate when a man of the intelligence and integrity of Ron Paul stands before them. He alone told us what was coming. He alone can point the way to a better future for America.

The most common strategy for the disinformation campaign to neutralize the effect of Thriveinvolves the logical fallacy known as the Ad Hominem. "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person." Every person; who understands logic, knows that attacking the messenger is a last ditch desperate tactic; that is only resorted to by a person who is NOT logical, AND ONLY when that person has already realized that there is no way to refute the message. Attacks on the messenger do not refute the message.

In the case of Foster Gamble the Ad Hominem is combined with another logical fallacy known as Guilt By Association. The Guilt By Association stems from the fact that Foster Gamble is a descendent of the founder of Proctor & Gamble. We are supposed to forget that political philosophies are not hereditary. FOSTER GAMBLE TOLD YOU IN THE BEGINNING THAT HE WAS A DESCENDENT OF THE FOUNDER OF PROCTER AND GAMBLE, BUT THAT HE HAD CHOSEN A DIFFERENT COURSE. HE ACTUALLY EMBARRASSES PROCTER AND GAMBLE BY DISCLOSING THE FACT THAT THEY HAD DEVELOPED THE RFID CHIP.

WATCH THE LAST SEGMENT WHICH IS CALLED "SOLUTIONS", then consider the following advice:

Matthew 7:16

16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

The chief grasshopper says "If you let one ant stand up to us then they all might stand up to us. It's not about food. It's about keeping those ants in line... Those puny little ants out number us a hundred to one, and if they ever figure that out, there goes our way of life.")

All of the power centers that the elites control require our participation. We just withdraw our support. This is true of the central banks, the military, the corporate media, the government and more.

THE MOST IMPORTANT SOLUTION IS NON-VIOLENT NON-COOPERATION.

It is the essential reality that the little people can take charge of their own destiny. The top of any pyramid can only exist because it is supported by a large base. The powerful elite are only powerful as long as they can stand on the backs of the submissive multitudes. When the foundation is destroyed the entire house of cards will fall. The essence of liberty is the awakening of the consciousness of the power that is held by the masses.

This is not limited to government.

It is every dollar that you spend.

It is where you bank. Bank locally instead of with the big central banks.

It means refusing GMO food.

It means dropping subscriptions to the corporate media, and supporting local media.

It means replacing the energy cartel with renewable energy.

It means growing your own food, and drinking filtered water.

It means boycotting companies that are part of the New World Order agenda.

It means refusing vaccination.

It means removing RFID chips, and preventing them from being implanted.

It means stopping bailouts.

It means dismantling the Federal reserve, and using alternative currency, or barter.

The most evil people in the world know that there is nothing worse that they can say about their adversaries than to claim that they are a part of their own agenda.

THIS IS NOT NEW.

Read what Jesus said when answering this charge:

Mark 322 And the scribes who came down from Jerusalem said, He has Beelzebub, and by the prince of the demons casts he out demons.23 And he called them unto him, and said unto them in parables, How can Satan cast out Satan?24 And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.25 And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.26 And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but comes to an end.

Anotherstrategy for the disinformation campaign to neutralize the effect of Thriveinvolves the raising the debate between evolution and creationism.

IT IS A FALSE DICHOTOMY TO SAY THAT CREATION AND EVOLUTION CANNOT BOTH EXIST. EVOLUTION MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO ASSERT THAT GOD DOES NOT EXIST.

The Answer to the Greatest Question is a series logical syllogisms on the infinite and proofs of the eternal truths, combined with mathematical formulas,

and scientific certainties.The Answer to the Greatest Question presents mathematical and scientific proof, of concepts; which have previously been considered to be subjective, and completely beyond the realm of proof.

Logical syllogisms are a set of statements which begin with a premise. The premise should be a statement which is agreed to be true. The author will attempt to present logical syllogisms, which begin with a premise that is agreed to be true. Understanding that it will be nearly impossible to have universal agreement on any premise, we will provide the challenges to every premise, in the true spirit of the skeptical hypothesis. In many instances, we will present EACH of the logical syllogisms, which begin with EACH of the opposing premises.

The ultimate goal of the logical syllogism is always to arrive at a conclusion, WHICH FOLLOWS DIRECTLY from the premise. If the same conclusion can be reached, even after accepting the opposing premises, then it would become practically impossible to refute the conclusion.

The atheist takes comfort in the assumption that a demand for scientific evidence will protect his atheism. He generally challenges the premise that is usually presented by the theist. I begin one section of the book by accepting a premise that he cannot challenge because it is his OWN assertion.

The atheist MUST believe that the universe is infinite in time, and in space. Otherwise:

If the universe were not infinite in time, the atheist must describe the origin of the universe, without asserting a creation. If the universe is not infinite in space, then the atheist must describe the edge of the universe.

Suppose that the universe is infinite in time, and infinite in space:

If evolution is the origin of life, WHERE EVER IT ORIGINATED in the universe, THEN:The inescapable conclusion is that evolution has been occurring in an infinite number of places, over an infinite amount of time.

The assertion of evolution, is that evolution progressively advances a species over time by eliminating the least competent from each generation, through natural selection.

Infinity multiplied by any number (other than zero) equals infinity.

Probability is the measure of how likely any outcome will be. When there are multiple chances, the probability of any one particular outcome is the accumulation of all of the probabilities of every chance. Infinitely adding any positive number to itself results in multiplication by infinity.

What would we get if we had a probability that is NOT zero, and this probability is allowed an infinite number of chances?

An infinite number of chances with a probability that is not zero amounts to the likelihood of the occurrence of that event being infinite. An infinite probability is as close to a certainty as is possible to exist.

We know that the probability for the existence of intelligent life is not zero. We know that this is true because intelligent life exists on Earth.

There is a simple formula that is taught in every elementary math class.

It says that distance is equal to rate multiplied by time:

DISTANCE EQUALS RATE MULTIPLIED BY TIME:

D = RT

The reality is simple: If any process advances in any direction, for an infinite period of time, then the net result can only be that this process will reachan infinite degree of progress. This formula is not limited to "distance" in the physical sense. This formula applies to ANY type of progression.

The theory of evolution is based on the assertion of "natural selection." The central assertion of "natural selection" is the idea that a species evolves in an upward direction, due to survival of the fittest. Each generation discards the least competent from the gene pool. This results in the continuous accumulation of additional capabilities. Thus far, mankind has only considered this assertion as it applies to our FINITE world. Now consider this assertion as it applies to the INFINITE universe.

An infinite number of chances with a probability that is not zero then this amounts to the likelihood of the occurrence of that event being infinite. An infinite probability is as close to a certainty as is possible to exist.

THE INESCAPABLE CONCLUSION:

There is an ABSOLUTE certainty that, somewhere in the universe, there is an INFINITE BEING.

Some who receive this message will not watch the movie.Some who watch it once, might not understand every part of it, or might not accept every part of it. A few people who watch this movie WILL CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY.

THRIVE - Is a movie that everyone should watch multiple times. If this information is new, it may take time to fully comprehend, and to digest its conceptual depth. This is a superb presentation! The graphics are amazing, and the information is concise. You will not know what this movie is about because of the way it begins. KEEP WATCHING!

This movie sums up the unfolding realities of our future with compelling accuracy and poignancy. It shows us where we are headed, and WHY. THRIVE also explains the solutions as to how we can change our direction.THRIVE not only details the historical development of the MARCH to TOTAL WORLD DOMINANCE, orchestrated by a handful of Elite Families, (better known as “the New World Order"), but is also lays out the remediation, and solutions that we can, and must, implement if we are going to “thrive” as individuals.It is a foregone conclusion that we cannot solve a problem until we understand it. This movie lets us understand the problem with unprecedented clarity. Educating ourselves with the facts is the first step to making the necessary shift in our conceptual paradigm and necessary ACTIONS.

Some who receive this message will not watch the movie.Some who watch it once, might not understand every part of it, or might not accept every part of it. A few people who watch this movie WILL CHANGE THE COURSE OF HISTORY.

THRIVE - Is a movie that everyone should watch multiple times. If this information is new, it may take time to fully comprehend, and to digest its conceptual depth. This is a superb presentation! The graphics are amazing, and the information is concise. This movie sums up the unfolding realities of our future with compelling accuracy and poignancy. It shows us where we are headed, and WHY. THRIVE also explains the solutions as to how we can change our direction.THRIVE not only details the historical development of the MARCH to TOTAL WORLD DOMINANCE, orchestrated by a handful of Elite Families, (better known as “the New World Order"), but is also lays out the remediation, and solutions that we can, and must, implement if we are going to “thrive” as individuals.It is a foregone conclusion that we cannot solve a problem until we understand it. This movie lets us understand the problem with unprecedented clarity. Educating ourselves with the facts is the first step to making the necessary shift in our conceptual paradigm and necessary ACTIONS.

November 01, 2011

WHETHER WE HAVE OBAMA OR A DIFFERENT FLUNKY FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE.

As Professor Quigley, the 20th century liberal, apologist for big government, and Bill Clinton's mentor, wrote in his 1975 testament to the Washington empire:

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and politics of the Right and Left, is a foolish idea the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. It should be possible, to replace one party with the other party which will pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policy." --Dr. Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope

Which party has given us lower taxes and less government? Which party has stopped deficit spending, foreign aid, welfare, BANKSTER BAILOUTS and other boondoggles?Which party has PROTECTED the United States from foreign enemies, terrorists, and illegal aliens (at least as well as they are defending the New World Order's power grab in other countries)?The difference between Republicans and Democrats is the specific explanations that they give, for WHY we are headed into totalitarianism.

One Video that says it ALLRon Paul: The Only One We Can Trust http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ohKz9OeiI0g------------------------------------------------------------------Ron Paul Closing Statement BLACKED OUT of CNN Republican debatehttp://www.libertyhq.org/2011/10/19/blackthisout/-----------------------------------------------------------Sarah Palin Endorses Ron Paul’s Libya PolicyIt’s getting colder and colder in Hell these days.Last week, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh endorsed Ron Paul’s plan to slash the federal budget by $1 trillion, eliminate 5 unconstitutional departments, and roll back federal spending to 2006 levels.This week, GOP Frontrunner Sarah Palin is giving Ron Paul’s non-interventionist foreign policy a thumbs-up.“You’ve got to give it to Ron Paul. Whether you agree with everything he says or not, at least he is one there in Congress trying to make our President stick to the law and understand that Congress does have a role to play in these foreign policy decisions that are made and Ron Paul, I think hit the nail on the head, when he came out and said Obama had better be careful when he interjects himself and our country in other nations’ business.” — Sarah PalinIf you actually have a knee jerk emotional reaction to the name Ron Paul, ask yourself what causes that knee jerk reaction. This is what the government controlled media and public school system has done to you. Rise above it and learn critical thinking skills.Journalists and editors are overwhelmingly controlled by New World Order globalists. So when you listen to “news” stories about GOP Frontrunner Ron Paul it is all the news that fits the plot. New World Order globalists pick your candidate for you.When the Mainstream Media New World Order shoves Mittens Romneycare down my throat, and gives just 2% of its news coverage to GOP Frontrunner Ron Paul, I become even more interested in what Ron Paul has to say.Especially when, despite the ongoing media blackout, Ron Paul is #3 in fundraising among GOP candidateseven though he shuns the elites and the corporate money. Ron Paul has won or placed second in over a dozen straw polls of active grassroots republican voters, including the Big Three: CPAC, the Iowa Straw Poll, and the Values Voters Straw poll.

Yet the Mainstream Media New World Order globalists continue to black out this story. Or when they do refer to GOP Frontrunner Ron Paul, they call him “unelectable,” which is an interesting adjective choice for someone who has been elected to his seat in Congress eleven times.Hmmm. It’s almost as though the Mainstream Media New World Order globalists do not want people to know about GOP Frontrunner Ron Paul.

Ron Paul gets 2% of the media coverage while winning most of the polls

August 28, 2011

The Supreme Court might be ready to finally do its job.According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court , even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years. Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on... And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.' Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue. First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.' Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii, double citizenship, natural born...and others. And that is only the tip of the iceberg. Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration. In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens. And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Mr Bill “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” Clinton, a man who knowingly lied to the nation on live television at the height of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, has called for the creation of an Internet ‘ministry of truth’ style organization that would be run by the federal government or the UN to address “misinformation and rumors floating on the Internet.”

Couching the idea in the kind of doublespeak rhetoric that would make George Orwell roll in his grave, Clinton said that the agency would have to be “independent” and “transparent,” but that it would be created and run by the federal government – a complete oxymoron.

The former president said that the organization “Would have to be an independent federal agency that no president could countermand or anything else because people wouldn’t think you were just censoring the news and giving a different falsehood out.”

No matter how many fluffy, friendly and democratic words he attaches to the proposal, Clinton is basically calling for the creation of a state-run media outlet in the mould of Communist China. He says it should operate like, “National Public Radio or BBC or something like that, except it would have to be really independent and they would not express opinions, and their mandate would be narrowly confined to identifying relevant factual errors.”

In other words, as his wife Hillary bemoaned recently, the US military-industrial complex is “losing the information war” to independent media outlets and something needs to be done to redress the balance because too many people are stumbling across that habitual irritant to the power elite – the truth.

Despite admitting that the organization would have “no credibility whatever, particularly with a lot of the people who are most active on the internet,” Clinton said that such an agency was necessary to counter “misinformation and rumors floating on the Internet,” reports Politico.

This is Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive infiltration” on steroids. Harvard law professor Sunstein, Obama’s information czar, has demanded websites be mandated by law to link to opposing information or that pop ups containing government propaganda be forcibly included on political blogs.

In a 2008 article published in the Journal of Political Philosophy, Sunstein outlined a plan for the government to stealthily infiltrate groups that pose alternative theories on historical events via “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine” those groups.On page 14 of Sunstein’s January 2008 white paper entitled

“Conspiracy Theories,” he proposed that “under imaginable conditions” the government “might ban conspiracy theorizing” and could “impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.”

Sunstein’s definition of “conspiracy theories” includes ideas shared by the majority of American people, such as the notion that the JFK assassination occurred as part of a wider plot, as well as the belief that the threat of global warming has been hyped by governments and global institutions. Both of these ideas would be examples of thought crime under Sunstein’s regime.

Bill Clinton’s call for a government-run ministry of truth is a brazen attempt to implement Sunstein’s dangerous anti-free speech agenda.

During Hillary’s call for the empire to strike back in the information war, she made particular reference to Russia Today as well as media platforms, and the fact that they were “winning” because they actually dared to act like “real news” organizations, asking questions of authority and investigating stories, and not like the US mainstream press, which acts as nothing more than an obedient, supine clearinghouse for government propaganda.

Russia Today, which regularly provides a voice to the likes of Alex Jones, Max Keiser, Wayne Madsen, Paul Craig Roberts and Webster Tarpley, has played an instrumental role in filling the gaps left by the castrated US corporate media by reporting on real news issues and actually having the temerity to question talking points put out by the White House – this is what the Clintons both want to see neutralized with a new ministry of truth run by the feds.

Indeed, when Russia Today attempted to put up promotional billboards in US airports encouraging viewers to think about both sides of a story, the ads were summarily banned.

That’s exactly why the likes of Bill and Hillary Clinton are demanding a more aggressive psychological warfare assault on the American people – they want to create an unthinking mass that instantly accepts what they are told by government as the absolute truth, despite the fact that the US government itself has proven itself to be the pre-eminent global leader in lies and deceit, while all dissenting voices will be crushed under Cass Sunstein’s thought crime information blockade.

It opens with Big Brother's principle:"Who controls the present, controls the past.Who controls the past controls the future."

A must read for anyone who wonders "how did we get here?", Before I believe a source, I check into their history. So it is with the Fabian Society.

Organized in 1884, founding members included the daughter of Karl Marx - the father of communism and its sibling offshoots. Obscure history (by that I mean facts you have to dig and hunt for) has been a hobby of mine for about 20 years. I find the truth to be stranger than fiction, and the long trail of the Fabian Society (and its successful policy of "penetrate and permeate") is truly incredible. Like a seed, an idea well planted will grow on its own after a bit of nurturing. So it is with Fabian Socialism. They have shaped so much of the way the world is, and few realize it.

One recent fact: The Fabian Society acquired - and sealed - the archives of Eric Blair (better known as "1984" author George Orwell) when his wife died some years ago. Orwell became disenchanted with the Fabian Society and it is now thought his book was really aimed at the kind of world he believed the Fabian Society would achieve.

As one source put it "A careful review of the literary evidence reveals that he was aiming at the period immediately following the year 2000 but wanted to memorialize the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Fabian Society." -AND- "I once inquired through a literary agent who was a friend of Sonia Orwell, the writer's second wife, whether 1984 might be a satirical polemic directed at the Fabians. She giggled nervously and remarked that perhaps that was right. And the Fabian Society once more has catapulted itself into the picture because, upon the death of Sonia Orwell, rights to George's estate fell under control of -- the Fabian Society. According to representatives of HarperCollins, the Fabians will be in control of the 1984 copyright and name through the year 2025 and will do their best to block unauthorized investigative research about Orwell's anti-socialist works." -AND- "The Fabian logo was the turtle, not the hare. Fabians believed they could be successful in taking over national governments incrementally even if it took 100 years. So why wouldn't Orwell take them at their word?"

This is just the tip of the iceberg, but you'll have to dig up the rest for yourself. My best sources were old books. Sometimes it would be tidbits, like one fascinating paragraph I found in a 1938 History textbook. The paragraph stated "On their honeymoon, Eleanor Roosevelt took her husband Franklin Delano Roosevelt to visit her old friends, Sydney and Beatrice Webb" Fact is, the Webb's were the main backbone of the Fabian Society from its beginning. So here we have an early socialist influence on an American president before he came to office. Tell me, where will you find that interesting item in today's history?

Sometimes it would be full books, like "Fabian Freeway" by Rose Martin - a former Fabian. This is the book that got me started, and it is an awesome place to start. Sometimes I find it hard to accept some of her allegations, but she was a member and knows the inside facts...

So, if you ever wonder "How did we get here", do the research. You'll be glad you did.

Orwell was introduced to the Fabian Society by his French teacher and lifelong friend Aldous Huxley. However, he later became disenchanted with the Fabian Society and it is now thought his book 1984 (a title chosen to mark the 100th anniversary of the Fabians) was really a satirical polemic describing the kind of world he believed the Fabians would achieve. The Fabian Society acquired and sealed the archives of Orwell when his second wife Sonia died some years ago. According to representatives of the publishing company Harper Collins, the Fabians will be in control of the "1984" copyright and name through the year 2025, and they have done their best to block unauthorized investigative research about Orwell's anti-socialist works. Even rights to Orwell's estate fell under control of the Fabian Society.

George Orwell is a pen name. The real name, for the author of "1984", is Eric Blair.Eric Blair joined the Fabian Socialist Society as a young man.He dropped out of the Fabian Socialist Society years before he wrote "1984".The Fabian Socialist Society was founded in 1884.At their founding, they made a prediction that they could accomplish their objectives within 100 years.When Eric Blair defected from the Fabian Socialist Society, and THEN he wrote "1984"."1984" was written as an EXPOSE of what the Fabian Socialist Society was trying to do. It is an INSIDER's expose' of reality. It is not a fantasy.

Everything in "1984" is coming to pass.

Remember the slogan: "War is peace"? It sounded ridiculous to me, when I first read it.Now we have a United Nations "peace" army that is out waging peace on almost a dozen nations.

Remember the slogan: "Freedom is Slavery"? Now we have "liberal" programs and national "Liberation" movements that are yelling "power to the people" and building bigger and more powerful government in every way.

Remember the slogan: "Ignorance is Strength"? Now it is called "plausible deniability". How many times have we heard "I have no recollection of that"?

What about "thought criminals"? Now we call them "cult members", "supremists", "anti--government", and numerous other terms that refer to unauthorized thoughts.How many laws do we already have against unauthorized thoughts?The news is full of reports about the need to monitor the internet to see who it is that might be LIKELY to commit a crime. How long will it be before we could you be charged with something like "suspicion of conspiracy of attempted intent'?"Politically correct" means that you are not a "thought criminal" A "Hate Crime" is an ordinary crime; which is given FEDERAL jurisdiction, and more severe penalty, because of the alleged THOUGHTS of thedefendant.

Who has the right to define such a term as "cult"?If freedom of religion exists THERE IS NO ONE who has authority to "approve" or "disapprove" of ANY religion.

"Cult member" is a modern word for what George Orwell calleda "thought criminal".

The real purpose of war is revealed here: "The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact."

-- William Shakespeare SUMMED IT UP in one line in "King Lear": "Be it thy policy to busy giddy minds with foreign quarrels."

"A tyrant is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader." ~Plato

In fact; what "1984" actually does, is to present is a very thorough description, and expose, on the plans of the Fabian Socialist Society.If one reads up on the goals of the Fabian Socialist Society, and then reads "1984" this will be clear.

I remember thinking that the Party's slogan "War is Peace" was too ridiculous to actually be believed by anyone. BUT TODAY we have a United Nations "peace" army that is out waging peace on almost a dozen nations.

IMAGINE: That you wake up tomorrow morning, and learn that The United Nations has declared your country to be a "no fly zone". The airport is closed. There are no more flights in or out.

IMAGINE: That you head out for work, and you find foreign troops in your streets. These foreign troops have set up "check points". You car is searched, and all weapons are taken from you. All political or religious literature is taken from you. Hopefully you are not arrested. If you ARE arrested you will be held without a trial.

IMAGINE: That you learn that some of your fellow citizens organized a protest demonstration, and were shot down in the street.

The February 12th 1999 New York Times accused UN personnel of executing children, suspected of being rebels, and a score of patients at Connaught Hospital in Freetown on January 12th. Other reports described the summary detention of civilians, brutal body searches, "whipping, beating, varying types of public humiliation" of detainees ­ including children ­ and acts of sexual assault committed by "peacekeepers."

IMAGINE: That The United Nations changes your President as they recently did in Haiti.

The United Nations is creating a world government. What kind of government will that be? Most of the member nations of The United Nations are totalitarian, by American standards. Are we supposed to believe that all of these dictators are planning to give up their power so that we can have a one world constitutional republic, with a competitive free enterprise system? Or shouldn't we conclude that we would wind up with a totalitarian socialist super state?

Who is your representative at The United Nations? Can you remember; for whom, you voted?The fact is: you HAVE NO REPRESENTATIVE AT The United Nations.EVERYONE voting at The United Nations is appointed by a government.Most of those governments are totalitarian. The United Nations is a government of the governments, for the governments, and by the governments.

The fact is: The world is be conquered by totalitarians, in the name of peace.

If you suddenly stop hearing from me, you may assume that the "Thought Police" have come for me. When I emerge from the "Ministry of Love", I may be uttering strange confessions. These strange confessions will be nothing more than the creative writing of the "Thought Police" written on the shell of human frailty.

The "Police State" Special Edition Issue of The New American magazine. (Fall/Winter 1994)

Oath KeepersOath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters who will fulfill the Oath we swore, with the support of like minded citizens who take an Oath to stand with us, to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God. Our Oath is to the Constitution

Sponsors: Liberty Defending Businesses

FREE DISCOUNT CARD FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS This is about the best thing that I have found in quite a while. HERE IS A WAY TO SAVE UP TO 75% ON PRESCRIPTION DRUGS
JUST CLICK HERE:
http://www.freerxplus.com/FRP01233/en/Home.html
PRINT YOUR OWN DISCOUNT CARD FROM THIS PAGE. IF YOU GO TO THIS WEB PAGE YOU WILL NOT BE ASKED FOR ANY MONEY. THIS IS FREE! MY OWN PRESCRIPTION WENT DOWN FROM $57 TO $17 INSTANTLY. MY PHARMACY PUT THE DISCOUNT CARD INTO THEIR COMPUTER, AND TOLD ME THAT I WOULD NEVER HAVE TO SHOW IT AGAIN. I GOT EXACTLY THE SAME THING THAT I HAD BEEN GETTING BEFORE I USED THIS DISCOUNT CARD. EVEN PEOPLE WITH INSURANCE SOMETIMES FIND THAT THE PRICE GOES TO LESS THAN THEIR CO-PAY. WE WONDER WHAT YOU ACTUALLY GET FOR BUYING INSURANCE. THIS ALSO SHOWS HOW BIG THE MARK UP IS IF YOU DO NOT GET THIS DISCOUNT.
WITHOUT REGARD TO THE HIGH LEVEL OF TRUST THAT I HAVE FOR THE PERSON WHO TOLD ME ABOUT THIS, I STILL DID TO TELL ANYONE ELSE ABOUT IT UNTIL IT WAS TIME TO REFILL MY OWN PRESCRIPTION. I HAD TO SEE IT WORK FOR MYSELF BEFORE I TOLD ANYONE ABOUT IT. YOU CAN SEE IT WORK FOR YOURSELF TOO.

Presentations by Soaring ConceptsPresentations by Soaring Concepts
Providing high-quality proposals and presentations to clients in the Carolinas. Share your Concept. Watch your Enterprise Soar.
"You Don't Have to Start at the Bottom"--Napoleon Hill

Crockett Cove ManorTo see a massive gallery of pictures of both unit interiors,
and of the exterior click here:
http://s87.photobucket.com/albums/k128/johnperna/