I was up in the early hours watching to see how far the Australian establishment would go to preserve/safeguard their interest which must have been paramount to the whole program and its consequences of denying the rights of clearly an innocent victim.

We know what the program was and from our own view we know what the consequences were to the Australian establishment. The more innocent she was found to be the more they acted like vultures around a dead carcass.

Folk should have switched channels from the moron TV producers turning her case into a comedy [whereas it was a comedy of errors by the government] but how many did, I wonder. What pleasure was gained from putting out these monsterous broadcasts [it was to get a laugh] and what pleasure was there to the TV viewer. I guess it was the Osama bin Laden syndrome. The Right Wing sense of humour.

It is obvious that had she been guilty, based on the evidence, none of this would have taken place. She would be a nobody who was guilty and deserved her punishment. There is nothing funny here. It was because she was an innocent nobody the establishment came out in force to turn the Australian public against her. You see, if they can make light of it and you laugh then you are not seeing the serious side of it. They can ill afford a serious investigative piece, similar to the linked video. There is no joke here and it is no laughing matter.

I would only trust that whatever the establishment had to protect was more important than the length it went through to deny her human rights and demonstrating how far they could go to below contempt but most of all one would hope that there was someone in the government worth the description of a diplomat /statesman and was given the proper advice to have determined the governments action was the right one to protect that interest.

Because the alternative is there was no diplomat/statesman in the government nor any knowledgeable adviser to have done something at the very beginning to have avoided the whole thing.

However, there is a third option. It suited them at the time to have this affair blow up and in the public domain. One really can't see why else it would have happened otherwise. What was it - to show how tough they could be and was this the front Australia wanted to put up to Indonesia.

You can't get anymore tough than to destroy the life of an innocent citizen of your country and a female, at that. Did it make it even better that she was attractive. Is she playing a part in their sick theatre production?

Is this a lead up to the new world order or are we in it already?

I hope she makes it home but where she calls home is another matter.

How long does an agenda last? As long as a government term? As long as two governments terms. After 20 years? Less with good behaviour?

Well, if we are sensible about it Indonesia is off our holiday list. How about Australia? Not sure? Safe holiday retreats are slowly diminishing with the onset of selective human rights.