nmm 22 4500ICPSR34777MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34777MiAaIMiAaI
2000 Sacramento Area Household Travel Survey
[electronic resource]
Jesse Casas
2013-09-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34777NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2000 Sacramento Area Household Travel Survey, like all recent household travel surveys, relied on the willingness of area residents to complete diary records of their daily travel for a specified day. During their travel day, participating household members were asked to record travel information in a travel diary for the specified 24-hour period. The information documented by respondents includes trip activities, mode of transportation, trip times, and trip location. Demographic information includes gender, age, whether the respondent held a valid driver's license, whether the respondent was a student, employment status, household income, whether the respondent owned or rented a home, and household size.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34777.v1
automobile ownershipicpsrautomobile useicpsrautomobilesicpsrcarpoolsicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdriving habitsicpsremploymenticpsrhighwaysicpsrhousehold incomeicpsrhouseholdsicpsrInterneticpsrlicensesicpsrpublic transportationicpsrschoolsicpsrtechnologyicpsrtelecommutingicpsrtrafficicpsrtransportationicpsrtravelicpsrvehiclesicpsrworkicpsrworking hoursicpsrICPSR VII. Geography and EnvironmentCasas, JesseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34777Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34777.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09965MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09965MiAaIMiAaI
Alternative Procedures for Reducing Delays in Criminal Appeals
[electronic resource] Sacramento, Springfield, and Rhode Island, 1983-1984
Joy A. Chapper
,
Roger A. Hanson
1994-02-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR9965NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection investigates the effectiveness of
alternative approaches to reducing delays in criminal
appeals. Interviews were conducted with court representatives from
districts employing differing alternatives. These districts and
approaches are (1) case management in the Illinois Appellate Court,
Fourth District, in Springfield, (2) staff screening for submission
without oral argument in the California Court of Appeals, Third
District, in Sacramento, and (3) fast-tracking procedures in the Rhode
Island Supreme Court. Parallel interviews were conducted in public
defenders' offices in three additional locations: Colorado, the
District of Columbia, and Minnesota. Questions focused on the backlogs
courts were facing, the reasons for the backlogs, and the
consequences. Participants were asked about the fairness and possible
consequences of procedures employed by their courts and other courts
in this study. Case data were acquired from court records of the
Springfield, Sacramento, and Rhode Island courts.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09965.v1
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrcase managementicpsrcase processingicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsChapper, Joy A.Hanson, Roger A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9965Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09965.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02369MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02369MiAaIMiAaI
American Housing Survey, 1996
[electronic resource]MSA Core and Supplement File
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2008-04-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR2369NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information on the
characteristics of the housing inventory in nine selected Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (MSAs). Data include year the structure was built,
type and number of living quarters, occupancy status, presence of
commercial or medical establishments on the property, and property
value. Additional data focus on kitchen and plumbing facilities, type
of heating fuel used, source of water, sewage disposal, and heating
and air conditioning equipment. Data concerned with housing quality
describe the condition of the walls and floors, adequacy of heat in
the winter, information on heating equipment breakdowns, availability
of room electrical outlets, concealed wiring, and basement and roof
water leakage. Data relating to housing expenses include mortgage or
monthly rent payments, utility costs, and fuel and garbage collection
fees. Information solicited from respondents who moved recently
included the characteristics of the previous unit and reasons for
moving. Other data indicate the presence of and objection to
neighborhood conditions such as street noise, crime, litter,
commercial activity, and institutional industrial activity, as well as
the availability of public transportation, schools, shopping
facilities, police, and hospitals. Information on condominiums covers
amount and frequency of mortgage payment, amount of property
insurance, real estate tax, utility costs, and condominium fees. In
addition to housing characteristics, data for each household member
are available on age, sex, race, marital status, income, and
relationship to householder. Additional data on years of school
completed, Spanish origin, length of residence, and tenure are
provided for the householder. Income sources identified in the data
include wages, rent, dividends, Social Security, unemployment and
workmen's compensation, government and private pensions, and alimony
and child support.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02369.v1
commuting (travel)icpsrenergy assistanceicpsrenergy conservationicpsrenergy consumptionicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing costsicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsrmetropolitan statistical areasicpsrmunicipal servicesicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrproperty insuranceicpsrproperty taxesicpsrproperty valuesicpsrrelocationicpsrrental housingicpsrtransportationicpsrutility ratesicpsrRCMD VII. HousingICPSR I.A.2. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Housing Survey SeriesNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2369Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02369.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04592MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04592MiAaIMiAaI
American Housing Survey, 2004
[electronic resource]Metropolitan Microdata
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2007-07-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4592NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The metropolitan survey is conducted in even-numbered
years, cycling through a set of 41 metropolitan areas, surveying each
one about once every six years. This data collection provides
information on the characteristics of a metropolitan sample of housing
units, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and
vacant housing units. The data are presented in eight separate parts:
Part 1, Work Done Record (Replacement or Addition to the House), Part
2, Worker Record, Part 3, Mortgages (Owners Only), Part 4, Housing
Unit Record (Main Record), Recodes (One Record per Housing Unit), and
Weights, Part 5, Manager and Owner Record (Renters Only), Part 6,
Person Record, Part 7, Ratio Verification, and Part 8, Mover Group
Record. Data include year the structure was built, type and number of
living quarters, occupancy status, access, number of rooms, presence
of commercial establishments on the property, and property value.
Additional data focus on kitchen and plumbing facilities, types
of heating fuel used, source of water, sewage disposal, heating and
air-conditioning equipment, and major additions, alterations, or
repairs to the property. Information provided on housing expenses
includes monthly mortgage or rent payments, cost of services such as
utilities, garbage collection, and property insurance, and amount of
real estate taxes paid in the previous year. Also included is
information on whether the household received government assistance to
help pay heating or cooling costs or for other energy-related
services. Similar data are provided for housing units previously
occupied by respondents who had recently moved. Additionally,
indicators of housing and neighborhood quality are supplied. Housing
quality variables include privacy of bedrooms, condition of kitchen
facilities, basement or roof leakage, breakdowns of plumbing
facilities and equipment, and overall opinion of the structure. For
quality of neighborhood, variables include use of exterminator
services, existence of boarded-up buildings, and overall quality of
the neighborhood. In addition to housing characteristics, some
demographic data are provided on household members, such as age, sex,
race, marital status, income, and relationship to householder.
Additional data provided on the householder include years of school
completed, Spanish origin, length of residence, and length of
occupancy.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04592.v1
commuting (travel)icpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrMetropolitan Statistical Areasicpsrmunicipal servicesicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrproperty insuranceicpsrproperty taxesicpsrproperty valuesicpsrrelocationicpsrenergy assistanceicpsrrental housingicpsrtransportationicpsrutility ratesicpsrenergy conservationicpsrenergy consumptionicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing costsicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrRCMD VII. HousingICPSR I.A.2. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Housing Survey SeriesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4592Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04592.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR07983MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR07983MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Housing Survey, 1976 [United States]
[electronic resource] SMSA Files
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR7983NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information on the
characteristics of the housing inventory in 20 Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSAs). Data include year the structure was built,
type and number of living quarters, occupancy status, presence of
commercial establishments on the property, presence of a garage, and
property value. Additional data focus on kitchen and plumbing
facilities, type of heating fuel used, source of water, sewage
disposal, and heating and air conditioning equipment. Information
about housing expenses includes mortgage or rent payments, utility
costs, garbage collection fees, property insurance, and real estate
taxes as well as repairs, additions, or alterations to the
property. Similar data are provided for housing units previously
occupied by respondents who had recently moved. Indicators of housing
and neighborhood quality are also supplied. Housing quality variables
include privacy of bedrooms, condition of kitchen facilities, basement
or roof leakage, presence of cracks or holes in walls, ceilings, or
floor, reliability of plumbing and heating equipment, and concealed
electrical wiring. The presence of storm doors and windows and
insulation was also noted. Neighborhood quality variables indicate
presence of and objection to street noise, odors, crime, litter, and
rundown and abandoned structures, as well as the adequacy of street
lighting, public transportation, public parks, schools, shopping
facilities, and police and fire protection. In addition to housing
characteristics, demographic data for household members are provided,
including sex, age, race, income, marital status, and household
relationship. Additional data are available for the household head,
including Hispanic origin, length of residence, and travel-to-work
information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07983.v1
housing conditionsicpsrhousing costsicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsrMetropolitan Statistical Areasicpsrmunicipal servicesicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrproperty insuranceicpsrproperty taxesicpsrproperty valuesicpsrrental housingicpsrrelocationicpsrutility ratesicpsrenergy consumptionicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousingicpsrRCMD VII. HousingNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsICPSR I.A.2. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Housing Survey SeriesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)7983Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07983.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08136MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1984 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08136MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Housing Survey, 1976 [United States]
[electronic resource]Travel-to-Work [SMSAs]
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1984ICPSR8136NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides travel-to-work data for
respondents living in 20 Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas
(SMSAs). Data cover respondents' means of transportation to and from
work -- whether they carpooled, drove alone, took public
transportation, or used some other means. Also included is
respondents' place of work and time they usually left home for
work. The data contained in this collection are from the
travel-to-work supplement in ANNUAL HOUSING SURVEY, 1976 [UNITED
STATES]: SMSA FILES (ICPSR 7983). The travel-to-work supplement was
sponsored by the United States Department of Transportation. The
collection consists of 20 data files, one for each SMSA represented.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08136.v1
automobilesicpsrcarpoolsicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrenergy assistanceicpsrenergy conservationicpsrenergy consumptionicpsrhousingicpsrincomeicpsrMetropolitan Statistical Areasicpsrmunicipal servicesicpsrpublic transportationicpsrtransportationicpsrworkplacesicpsrICPSR I.A.2. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Housing Survey SeriesNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsRCMD VII. HousingUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8136Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08136.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08257MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08257MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Housing Survey, 1980 [United States]
[electronic resource]SMSA Files
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2007-11-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8257NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information on the
characteristics of the housing inventory in 15 Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSAs). Data include year the structure was built,
type and number of living quarters, occupancy status, presence of
commercial establishments on the property, presence of a garage, and
property value. Additional data focus on kitchen and plumbing
facilities, type of heating fuel used, source of water, sewage
disposal, and heating and air conditioning equipment. Information
about housing expenses includes mortgage or rent payments, utility
costs, garbage collection fees, property insurance, real estate
taxes, and repairs, additions, or alterations to the property.
Similar data are provided for housing units previously occupied by
respondents who had recently moved. Indicators of housing and
neighborhood quality are also supplied. Housing quality variables
include privacy of bedrooms, condition of kitchen facilities,
basement or roof leakage, presence of cracks or holes in walls,
ceilings, or floor, reliability of plumbing and heating equipment,
and concealed electrical wiring. The presence of storm doors and
windows and insulation was also noted. Neighborhood quality variables
indicate presence of and objection to street noise, odors, crime,
litter, and rundown and abandoned structures, as well as the adequacy
of street lighting, public transportation, public parks, schools,
shopping facilities, and police and fire protection. Extensive
information on the ability of handicapped persons to move around
their homes is also provided. Respondents were asked if they needed
special equipment, or the help of another person to move around. They
were also asked about the presence or need for housing features to
aid their movement, such as ramps, braille lettering, elevators, and
extra wide doors. In addition to housing characteristics, demographic
data for household members are provided, including sex, age, race,
income, marital status, and household relationship. Additional data
are available for the household head, including Hispanic origin,
length of residence, and travel-to-work information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08257.v1
accessibility (for disabled)icpsrenergy consumptionicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrincomeicpsrhousing costsicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrMetropolitan Statistical Areasicpsrmunicipal servicesicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrproperty insuranceicpsrproperty taxesicpsrproperty valuesicpsrrelocationicpsrrental housingicpsrutility ratesicpsrRCMD VII. HousingICPSR I.A.2. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Housing Survey SeriesNACDA II. Social Characteristics of Older AdultsUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8257Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08257.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR08420MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1985 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR08420MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Housing Survey, 1983 [United States]
[electronic resource]SMSA Files
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2007-12-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1985ICPSR8420NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides information on the
characteristics of the housing inventory in 13 Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSAs). Data include year the structure was built,
type and number of living quarters, occupancy status, presence of
commercial establishments on the property, presence of a garage, and
property value. Additional data focus on kitchen and plumbing
facilities, type of heating fuel used, source of water, sewage
disposal, and heating and air conditioning equipment. Information
about housing expenses includes mortgage or rent payments, utility
costs, garbage collection fees, property insurance, and real estate
taxes as well as repairs, additions, or alterations to the property.
Similar data are provided for housing units previously occupied by
respondents who had recently moved. Indicators of housing and
neighborhood quality are also supplied. Housing quality variables
include privacy of bedrooms, condition of kitchen facilities,
basement or roof leakage, presence of cracks or holes in walls,
ceilings, or floor, reliability of plumbing and heating equipment,
and concealed electrical wiring. The presence of storm doors and
windows and insulation was also noted. Neighborhood quality variables
indicate presence of and objection to street noise, odors, crime,
litter, and rundown and abandoned structures, as well as the adequacy
of street lighting, public transportation, public parks, schools,
shopping facilities, and police and fire protection. Extra
information is provided on mobile homes and condominiums including
mortgage payments, purchase price, and real estate taxes. In addition
to housing characteristics, demographic data for household members
are provided, including sex, age, race, income, marital status, and
household relationship. Additional data are available for the
household head, including Hispanic origin, length of residence, and
travel-to-work information.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08420.v1
property insuranceicpsrproperty taxesicpsrproperty valuesicpsrrental housingicpsrrelocationicpsrutility ratesicpsrenergy consumptionicpsrhome ownershipicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing costsicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsrMetropolitan Statistical Areasicpsrmunicipal servicesicpsrneighborhood conditionsicpsrNACDA III. Economic Characteristics of Older AdultsRCMD VII. HousingICPSR I.A.2. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Housing Survey SeriesUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)8420Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08420.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03688MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2003 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03688MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2001
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2003ICPSR3688NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM)
Program is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use
in the population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were
collected in 2001 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year
in 33 metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program
adopted a new instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male
(Part 1) and female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in
juvenile detention facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile
instrument from previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE
FORECASTING series (ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2001 also
continued the use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in
adult facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male
adult sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling
stratification of the data. For the adult files, variables fell into
one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2)
ADAM facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the
case, including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of
admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs,
(5) data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence (6) drug
acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs,
(7) urine test results, and (8) weights. The juvenile file contains
demographic variables and arrestee's self-reported past and continued
use of 15 drugs, as well as other drug-related behaviors.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3688Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03688.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03815MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03815MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2002
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR3815NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program
is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the
population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in
2002 at four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 36
metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new
instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and
female (Part 2) arrestees. Data from arrestees in juvenile detention
facilities (Part 3) continued to use the juvenile instrument from
previous years, extending back through the DRUG USE FORECASTING series
(ICPSR 9477). The ADAM program in 2002 also continued the use of
probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult facilities, which
was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult sample includes
weights, generated through post-sampling stratification of the data. For
the adult files, variables fell into one of eight categories: (1)
demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM facesheet (records-based)
data, (3) data on disposition of the case, including accession to a
verbal consent script, (4) calendar of admissions to substance abuse and
mental health treatment programs, (5) data on alcohol and drug use,
abuse, and dependence, (6) drug acquisition data covering the five most
commonly used illicit drugs, (7) urine test results, and (8) weights.
The juvenile file contains demographic variables and arrestee's
self-reported past and continued use of 15 drugs, as well as other
drug-related behaviors.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3815Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03815.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04020MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04020MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program in the United States, 2003
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice
2006-03-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4020NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program
is to determine the extent and correlates of illicit drug use in the
population of booked arrestees in local areas. Data were collected in
2003 up to four separate times (quarterly) during the year in 39
metropolitan areas in the United States. The ADAM program adopted a new
instrument in 2000 in adult booking facilities for male (Part 1) and
female (Part 2) arrestees. The ADAM program in 2003 also continued the
use of probability-based sampling for male arrestees in adult
facilities, which was initiated in 2000. Therefore, the male adult
sample includes weights, generated through post-sampling stratification
of the data. For the adult male and female files, variables fell into
one of eight categories: (1) demographic data on each arrestee, (2) ADAM
facesheet (records-based) data, (3) data on disposition of the case,
including accession to a verbal consent script, (4) calendar of
admissions to substance abuse and mental health treatment programs, (5)
data on alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence, (6) drug
acquisition data covering the five most commonly used illicit drugs, (7)
urine test results, and (8) for males, weights.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Justice. National Institute of JusticeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4020Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04020.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34362MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34362MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2011
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2013-06-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34362NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II, 2011, is a collection of interview and bioassay data on over 5000 arrestees in 10 United States counties within 48 hours of their arrest. The collection took place between April 1 and September 30, 2011 and represents the fifth year of ADAM II data collection under the sponsorship of the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
The 10 current ADAM II sites are: Atlanta, GA (Fulton County); Charlotte, NC (Mecklenburg County); Chicago, IL (Cook County); Denver, CO (Denver County); Indianapolis, IN (Marion County); Minneapolis, MN (Hennepin County); New York, NY (Borough of Manhattan); Portland, OR (Multnomah County); Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County); and Washington, DC (District of Columbia).
In 2011, 5,051 interviews and 4,412 urine tests were conducted in the 10 ADAM II sites over 14 consecutive days in each of two calendar quarters between April 1 and September 30. The samples across these sites represent 35,459 adult males arrested in the 10 sites during the data collection period. Demographic variables include arrest date and time, gender, date of birth, number and types of offenses, county of arrest, race, education, work status, and language of interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34362.v1
criminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrimprisonmenticpsrjailsicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrest recordsicpsrICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34362Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34362.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34821MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34821MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2012 (Restricted Use)
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2013-08-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34821NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II, 2012 is a collection of interview and bioassay data provided by over 3000 arrestees from five county sites within the United States. Under the sponsorship of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), the ADAM II program monitors drug use and related behaviors (treatment experiences, housing stability, drug market activity, age at first use, employment, etc.) in a probability based sample of male adult arrestees within 48 hours of their arrest. The five ADAM II sites for 2012 were: Atlanta, GA (Fulton County and the City of Atlanta); Chicago, IL (Cook County); Denver, CO (Denver County); New York, NY (Borough of Manhattan); and Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County). The 2012 survey represents the sixth year of ADAM II and includes data from 1,938 interviews and 1,736 urine tests that were conducted at the five ADAM II sites over a 21-day period, between April 30 and July 29, 2012. The samples from these sites were weighted to represent over 14,000 arrests of adult males in the five counties. ADAM II data include official records, arrestee responses from a 20-minute face-to-face interview, and results from voluntary urine samples which tested for the presence of nine different drugs. Identifying information on the arrestees was not retained or shared with law enforcement. Demographic variables include age, gender, race, arrest date and time, county of arrest, number and type(s) of offense(s), education, work status, and language of interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34821.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrest recordsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrimprisonmenticpsrjailsicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34821Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34821.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35169MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35169MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II in the United States, 2013 (Restricted Use)
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2014-08-01Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35169NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II, 2013 is a collection of interview and bioassay data provided by over 3000 arrestees from five county sites within the United States. Under the sponsorship of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), the ADAM II program monitors drug use and related behaviors (treatment experiences, housing stability, drug market activity, age at first use, employment, etc.) in a probability based sample of male adult arrestees within 48 hours of their arrest. The five ADAM II sites for 2013 were: Atlanta, GA (Fulton County and the City of Atlanta); Chicago, IL (Cook County); Denver, CO (Denver County); New York, NY (Borough of Manhattan); and Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County). The 2013 survey represents the seventh year of ADAM II and includes data from 1,900 interviews and 1,681 urine tests that were conducted at the five ADAM II sites over a 21-day period, between May 5, 2013 and July 28, 2013. ADAM II data include official records, arrestee responses from a 20-minute face-to-face interview, and results from voluntary urine samples which tested for the presence of nine different drugs. Identifying information on the arrestees was not retained or shared with law enforcement. Demographic variables include age, gender, race, citizenship, marital status, arrest date and time, county of arrest, number and type(s) of offense(s), education, work status, and language of interview.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35169.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrest recordsicpsrarrestsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug useicpsrimprisonmenticpsrjailsicpsrmental healthicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35169Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35169.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25821MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25821MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2007
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
2010-01-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25821NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, the ONDCP and Abt Associates have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. A total of 8,296 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2007. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2
ADAM/DUF Programicpsraddictionicpsralcoholismicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug useicpsrheroinicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeHunt, DanaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25821Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25821.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27221MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27221MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2008
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
,
William Rhodes
2010-03-31Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR27221NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc. have initiated a new data collection that replicates the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implements two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collects data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. Data collection has been conducted across two back-to-back quarters in each of 10 counties from a county-based representative sample of 250 male arrestees per quarter for a total of 500 arrestees annually per site or a total of 5,000 arrestees across sites annually. A total of 7,717 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2008. Collection occurs in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2007 and ending March 31, 2008. Additional data collection periods were optioned by ONDCP, and subsequent cycles of back-to-back data collection (not yet available) began April 1, 2008. Participation is voluntary and confidential, and the procedures include a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1
addictionicpsralcoholismicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug useicpsrheroinicpsrmarijuanaicpsrADAM/DUF ProgramicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHunt, DanaRhodes, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27221Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27221.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30061MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30061MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2009
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
,
William Rhodes
2011-02-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30061NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 7,794 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2009. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2009, and ending September 30, 2009. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemHunt, Dana Rhodes, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30061Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30061.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32321MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32321MiAaIMiAaI
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States, 2010
[electronic resource]
Dana Hunt
,
William Rhodes
2011-11-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR32321NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) program was designed to monitor trends in drug use among arrested populations in key urban areas across the United States. The first ADAM data collection was instituted in 2000 as a replacement for the Drug Use Forecasting program (DUF), which employed a non-scientific sampling procedure to select primarily felony arrestees in 23 urban areas throughout the country. The year 2000 revision of ADAM instituted a representative sampling strategy among booked male arrestees in an expanded network of 35 sites. The program was suspended by the National Institute of Justice in 2003 and restarted in 2007 with funding from the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). With ADAM II, ONDCP and its contractor, Abt Associates Inc., initiated a new data collection that replicated the ADAM methodology in order to obtain data comparable to previously established trends. ADAM II implemented two quarters of data collection in ten sentinel ADAM sites to revive monitoring drug trends, with a particular focus on obtaining valid and reliable information on methamphetamine use. Representing minimal adjustments to the previously employed ADAM survey, the ADAM II survey collected data about drug use, drug and alcohol dependency and treatment, and drug market participation among booked male arrestees within 48 hours of arrest. A total of 8,332 arrestees were interviewed during the second and third quarters of 2010. Collection occurred in two cycles in booking facilities at each site to provide estimates for two calendar quarters each year. Data in this file were collected beginning April 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2010. Participation was voluntary and confidential, and the procedures included a personal interview (lasting approximately 20 minutes) and collection of a urine specimen. Demographic variables include age, race, most serious charge, date of arrest, time of arrest, and education level. The data also include whether the provided urine specimen was positive for several drugs including marijuana, cocaine, PCP, methamphetamines, and barbiturates.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramHunt, DanaRhodes, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32321Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04278MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04278MiAaIMiAaI
Assessing Trends and Best Practices of Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Programs in the United States, 2003
[electronic resource]
Patrick Curtin
,
David Thomas
,
Daniel Felker
,
Eric Weingart
2007-09-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4278NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This trends and best practices evaluation geared toward
motor vehicle theft prevention with a particular focus on the Watch
Your Car (WYC) program was conducted between October 2002 and March
2004. On-site and telephone interviews were conducted with
administrators from 11 of 13 WYC member states. Surveys were mailed to
the administrators of auto theft prevention programs in 36 non-WYC
states and the 10 cities with the highest motor vehicle theft rates.
Completed surveys were returned from 16 non-WYC states and five of the
high auto theft rate cities. Part 1, the survey for Watch Your Car
(WYC) program members, includes questions about how respondents
learned about the WYC program, their WYC related program activities,
the outcomes of their program, ways in which they might have done
things differently if given the opportunity, and summary questions
that asked WYC program administrators for their opinions about various
aspects of the overall WYC program. The survey for the nonmember
states, Part 2, and cities, Part 3, collected information about motor
vehicle theft prevention within the respondent's state or city and
asked questions about the respondent's knowledge of, and opinions
about, the Watch Your Car program.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04278.v1
auto thefticpsrcrime control programsicpsrcrime preventionicpsrcrime reductionicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstolen propertyicpsrstolen vehiclesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD I. Attitude SurveysCurtin, PatrickThomas, DavidFelker, DanielWeingart, EricInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4278Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04278.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25801MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25801MiAaIMiAaI
Campaign Finance in Local Elections
[electronic resource]An Eleven City Study, 1989-2007 [United States]
Brian Adams
2010-06-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR25801NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains campaign finance data for candidates in local elections held from 1989 to 2007 in the following cities: New York City (NY), Los Angeles (CA), Chicago (IL), San Francisco (CA), Seattle (WA), Miami (FL), Tampa (FL), Lexington (KY), Louisville (KY), Sacramento (CA), and Long Beach (CA). Data were also collected for the counties Hillsborough County/Tampa (FL) and Miami-Dade (FL). The study includes data on funds raised and spent, as well as candidate data and election returns, and both mayoral and city council races. Information was also collected on the size of the population of the candidates jurisdiction, the amount of political contributions and committee expenditures, whether the election was held in a publicly-funded city, and the outcome of the election. Demographic variables include candidate's sex, race, political party, education, and occupation.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25801.v1
campaign financeicpsrcandidatesicpsrcity councilsicpsrelectionsicpsrexpendituresicpsrlocal electionsicpsrICPSR XIV.A.1. Mass Political Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Electoral Processes, Primaries, Conventions, and CampaignsAdams, BrianInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25801Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25801.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02913MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02913MiAaIMiAaI
Census of Population and Housing, 2000 [United States]
[electronic resource]1998 Dress Rehearsal, P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data, Geographic Files for 11 Counties in South Carolina, Sacramento, California, and Menominee County, Wisconsin
United States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR2913NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
information, these maps show the boundaries and codes for state
legislative districts and their underlying features. These maps also
show the boundaries of and names of American Indian/Alaska Native
areas, counties, county subdivisions, and places. The scale of the
district maps is optimized to keep the number of map sheets for each
area to a minimum, but the scale and number of map sheets will vary by
the area size of the county and the voting districts and state
legislative districts delineated by the states. The Census 2000 Dress
Rehearsal TIGER/Line Files consist of line segments representing
physical features and governmental and statistical boundaries. The
files contain information distributed over a series of record types
for the spatial objects of a county. These TIGER/Line Files are an
extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the
Census TIGER (Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and
Referencing) database. While the geographic coverage for a single
TIGER/Line File is usually a county or statistical equivalent entity,
the 1998 Dress Rehearsal TIGER/Line Files include only those entities
included in the Dress Rehearsal with the coverage area based on
January 1, 1998, legal boundaries. The Census's TIGER database
represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between
parts. However, each 1998 Dress Rehearsal TIGER/Line File is designed
to stand alone as an independent dataset. The TIGER/Line Files for
each distinct geographic area can also be combined to show the entire
area that was included in the Dress Rehearsal for that site. There are
a total of 17 record types in the TIGER/Line Files, including the
basic data record, the shape coordinate points, and geographic codes,
that can be used with appropriate software to prepare maps. A complete
list of codes for the record types can be found in Chapter 6 of the
Technical Documentation for TIGER/Line Files (Part 603).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02913.v1
census dataicpsrcensus methodsicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcomputer aided mappingicpsrcongressional districtsicpsrcountiesicpsrelection districtsicpsrethnicityicpsrgeographic information systemsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrlegislative districtsicpsrpopulationicpsrredistrictingicpsrstates (USA)icpsrICPSR I.A.1.e. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 2000 CensusUnited States Department of Commerce. Bureau of the CensusInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2913Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02913.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02931MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02931MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1950
[electronic resource]Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2931NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1950 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02931.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2931Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02931.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02932MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2000 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02932MiAaIMiAaI
Census Tract Data, 1960
[electronic resource] Elizabeth Mullen Bogue File
Donald Bogue
2006-01-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2000ICPSR2932NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The 1960 Census Tract files were originally created by
keypunching the data from the printed publications prepared by the
Bureau of the Census. The work was done under the direction of
Dr. Donald Bogue, whose wife, Elizabeth Mullen Bogue, completed much
of the data work. Subsequently, the punchcards were converted to data
files and transferred to the National Archive and Records
Administration (NARA). ICPSR received copies of these files from NARA
and converted the binary block-length records to ASCII format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02932.v1
census dataicpsrcensus tract levelicpsrcensusesicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrethnicityicpsrhistorical dataicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrpopulationicpsrICPSR I.A.1.a. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, Decennial Censuses, 1790-1960 CensusesDSDR VIII. NICHD Supported StudiesBogue, DonaldInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2932Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02932.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25204MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25204MiAaIMiAaI
Housing Affordability Data System (HADS), 2004
[electronic resource]
David A. Vandenbroucke
2009-10-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25204NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Housing Affordability Data System (HADS) is a set of housing unit level datasets that measures the affordability of housing units and the housing cost burdens of households, relative to area median incomes, poverty level incomes, and Fair Market Rents. The purpose of these datasets is to provide housing analysts with consistent measures of affordability and burdens over a long period. The datasets are based on the American Housing Survey (AHS) national files from 1985 through 2005 and the metropolitan files for 2002 and 2004. Users can link records in HADS files to AHS records, allowing access to all of the AHS variables. Housing-level variables include information on the number of rooms in the housing unit, the year the unit was built, whether it was occupied or vacant, whether the unit was rented or owned, whether it was a single family or multiunit structure, the number of units in the building, the current market value of the unit, and measures of relative housing costs. The dataset also includes variables describing the number of people living in the household, household income, and the type of residential area (e.g., urban or suburban).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25204.v1
home ownershipicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrhousingicpsrhousing conditionsicpsrhousing costsicpsrhousing occupancyicpsrhousing unitsicpsrincomeicpsrliving arrangementsicpsrrental housingicpsrutility ratesicpsrICPSR I.A.2. Census Enumerations: Historical and Contemporary Population Characteristics, United States, American Housing Survey SeriesICPSR IV.C. Economic Behavior and Attitudes, Historical and Contemporary Economic Processes and IndicatorsVandenbroucke, David A.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25204Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25204.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25621MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25621MiAaIMiAaI
Impact of Legal Advocacy on Intimate Partner Homicide in the United States, 1976-1997
[electronic resource]
Laura Dugan
2009-07-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25621NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examined the impacts of jurisdictions' domestic violence policies on violent behavior of family members and intimate partners, on the likelihood that the police discovered an incident, and on the likelihood that the police made an arrest. The research combined two datasets. Part 1 contains information on police, prosecution policies, and local victim services. Informants within the local agencies of the 50 largest cities in the United States were contacted and asked to complete a survey inventorying policies and activities by type and year of implementation. Data from completed surveys covered 48 cities from 1976 to 1996. Part 2 contains data on domestic violence laws. Data on state statutes from 1976 to 1997 that related to protection orders were collected by a legal expert for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1
arrestsicpsrcrime reportingicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrintimate partner violenceicpsrpolice reportsicpsrpolicy analysisicpsrstate legislaturesicpsrvictim servicesicpsrNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationDugan, LauraInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25621Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25621.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33201MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33201MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring Drug Epidemics and the Markets That Sustain Them, Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) and ADAM II Data, 2000-2003 and 2007-2010
[electronic resource]
Andrew Golub
,
Henry H. Brownstein
,
Eloise Dunlap
2012-12-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33201NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examined trends in the use of five widely abused drugs among arrestees at 10 geographically diverse locations from 2000 to 2010: Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Denver, Indianapolis, Manhattan, Minneapolis, Portland Oregon, Sacramento, and Washington DC. The data came from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program reintroduced in 2007 (ADAM II) and its predecessor the ADAM program. ADAM data included urinalysis results that provided an objective measure of recent drug use, provided location specific estimates over time, and provided sample weights that yielded unbiased estimates for each location. The ADAM data were analyzed according to a drug epidemics framework, which has been previously employed to understand the decline of the crack epidemic, the growth of marijuana use in the 1990s, and the persistence of heroin use. Similar to other diffusion of innovation processes, drug epidemics tend to follow a natural course passing through four distinct phases: incubation, expansion, plateau, and decline. The study also searched for changes in drug markets over the course of a drug epidemic.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33201.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsrarrestsicpsrcocaineicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrcrime patternsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug offendersicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug testingicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrheroinicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrtrendsicpsrurinalysisicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemGolub, AndrewBrownstein, Henry H.Dunlap, EloiseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33201Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33201.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04577MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04577MiAaIMiAaI
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in a Sample of Arrestees in Sacramento, California, 1999
[electronic resource]
Carole Barnes
,
Bruce G. Taylor
2008-06-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR4577NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study served as the pilot study for the domestic violence addendum to the National Institute of Justice's Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program. The domestic violence addendum was administered during the third (Part 1) and fourth (Part 2) quarters of 1999 in Sacramento, California, to all arrestees who completed the ADAM interview, provided a urine specimen, and agreed to answer additional questions about domestic violence. The addendum was based on the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (Staus and Gelles, 1986) and sought to examine the issue of being the victim and/or perpetrator of domestic violence, age of onset of domestic violence, and injuries from domestic violence. The data also include demographic variables, arrest and charge variables, and alcohol and drug use variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04577.v1
ADAM/DUF Programicpsralcohol abuseicpsrarrestsicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrdrug useicpsroffendersicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrurinalysisicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationBarnes, CaroleTaylor, Bruce G.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4577Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04577.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22760MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22760MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2009-06-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR22760NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The study explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status. Demographic information includes age given at follow-up visits, country of birth, language, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, household income, and size of household.
For additional information about this data collection, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22760.v1
job historyicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicationsicpsrforeign bornicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrheart diseaseicpsrHispanic Americansicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsralcoholicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrsmokingicpsrarthritisicpsrvision impairmenticpsrblood pressureicpsrdiabetesicpsrelderlyicpsrexerciseicpsreye diseaseicpsreyesighticpsragingicpsrNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX.E. LatinoRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, Ladison Jagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22760Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22760.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34483MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34483MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]Demographic Data
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2012-12-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34483NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
This study contains demographic variables for the the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA) Series and can be used with ICPSR studies 22760, 29321, 29322, 29323. Demographic variables include gender, primary language, country of origin, state of birth, cause of death, 2000 census tract codes, birth date, date of death, and age given at follow-up visits.
About SALSA: The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical, and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The study explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social, and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status.
For additional information about this data collection, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34483.v1
agingicpsralcoholicpsrarthritisicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrdiabetesicpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrforeign bornicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrsmokingicpsrvision impairmenticpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX.E. LatinoNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, LadisonJagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, WilliamInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34483Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34483.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29322MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29322MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]Neuroclinical Exam Data
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2010-11-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29322NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical, and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The study explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social, and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status. This study contains the neuroclinical exam data from the SALSA project. Demographic information includes age given at follow-up visits, country of birth, language, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, household income, and size of household.
For additional information about the SALSA project and data, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29322.v1
religious affiliationicpsragingicpsralcoholicpsrarthritisicpsrblood pressureicpsrdiabetesicpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrforeign bornicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrheart diseaseicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsmokingicpsrvision impairmenticpsrRCMD IX.E. LatinoRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, Ladison Jagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29322Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29322.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29323MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29323MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]Neuropsychological Exam Data
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2010-11-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29323NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical, and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The project explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social, and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status. This study contains the neuropsychological exam data from the SALSA project. Demographic information includes age given at follow-up visits, country of birth, language, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, household income, and size of household.
For additional information about this data collection, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29323.v1
agingicpsralcoholicpsrarthritisicpsrblood pressureicpsrdiabetesicpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrforeign bornicpsrhealthicpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrheart diseaseicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmedical careicpsrmedicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrsmokingicpsrvision impairmenticpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesRCMD IX.E. LatinoNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, Ladison Jagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29323Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29323.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29321MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29321MiAaIMiAaI
Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study), 1996-2008
[electronic resource]Semi-Annual Phone Call Data
Mary Haan
,
Allison Aiello
,
Hector Gonzalez
,
Ladison Hinton
,
Bill Jagust
,
Josh Miller
,
Kari Moore
,
Lynn Blythe
,
Dan Mungas
,
William Seavey
2010-11-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29321NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging (SALSA Study) project tracked the incidence of physical and cognitive impairment as well as dementia and cardiovascular diseases in elderly Latinos in the Sacramento, California, region. The SALSA project aimed to assess cognitive, physical and social functions, which include the ability to follow instructions, to perform certain movements, and to interact with others. The project explored the effects that cultural, nutritional, social, and cardiovascular risk factors have on overall health and dementia, and examined the association between diabetes and functional status. This study, Semi-Annual Phone Call Data, contains data from the six-month follow-up call of the SALSA project. Demographic information includes age given at follow-up visits, country of birth, language, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, household income, and size of household.
For additional information about the SALSA project, see the
SALSA Web site.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29321.v1
medicationsicpsrmental healthicpsrolder adultsicpsrphysical conditionicpsrphysical limitationsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious affiliationicpsrsmokingicpsrvision impairmenticpsrhealth careicpsrhealth problemsicpsrhealth statusicpsrHispanic or Latino Americansicpsragingicpsralcoholicpsrarthritisicpsrcardiovascular diseaseicpsrdiabetesicpsrexerciseicpsreyesighticpsrforeign bornicpsrhypertensionicpsrillnessicpsrincomeicpsrjob historyicpsrmedical careicpsrICPSR IX. Health Care and Health FacilitiesNACDA V. Physical Health and Functioning of Older AdultsRCMD IX.E. LatinoDSDR IX. NIA Supported StudiesRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingHaan, MaryAiello, AllisonGonzalez, HectorHinton, Ladison Jagust, BillMiller, JoshMoore, KariBlythe, LynnMungas, DanSeavey, William Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29321Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29321.v1