min/max cardinality on assertion properties

JK: proposal 2 is a shorthand for having
multiple assertions; then the single properties (e.g. result and locations)
would be all the same for each subjects/tests
... you could do this compression with results without instance locations

SAZ: we don't want to propose omitting instance
locations

CV: I like proposal 1, don't like grouping

CI: prefer 2, can live with 1

CR: probably prefers 1

JK: prefers 1, 2 could be dangerous

SAZ: how about not restricting in the schema
(proposal 2), but in prose texts use porposal 1?

CV: too much confusion

RESOLUTION: proposal 1 (exactly
one subject and test properties) agreed, have some more discussion on the
mailing list