Unique Statistics:

open-access license:
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0)
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the
work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objectives:

To identify laboratory and clinical characteristics of different pathogens associated with early-onset sepsis (EOS) of the newborn.

Methods:

Newborns with EOS were retrospectively analyzed regarding laboratory and clinical parameters associated with the identified pathogen.

Results:

We identified 125 newborns having diagnosis of culture proven EOS between 1993 and 2011. One hundred cases had diagnosis of group B streptococci (GBS) infection (80%), 11 had Escherichia coli (8.8%), eight enterococci (6.4%), and six other pathogens (4.8%). White blood cell count (WBC), immature to total neutrophil (IT) ratio, and C-reactive protein (CRP) values did not differ between groups within the first 72 hours of life. Presence of high (>30000/µL) and low (<9000/µl) WBC was significantly less found compared with IT-ratio >0.2 in GBS and E.coli EOS. High WBC were more common found than low WBC in all groups. Gram positive pathogens were more common found in late preterm and term infants (84%), and gram negative pathogens more common in very low birth weight infants (64%). E. coli was significantly associated with lower gestational age and birth weight, respectively.

Conclusion:

An abnormal IT-ratio was a more common finding than an abnormal WBC in GBS and E. coli EOS. E. coli was significantly associated with prematurity.

INTRODUCTION

Early onset sepsis (EOS) of the newborn is a severe disease associated with high morbidity and mortality [1]. At present group B streptococci (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E.coli) are the most common pathogens in developing countries [2, 3]. The natural incidence of GBS EOS, before preventive intervention, ranged from 0.5 to 4 or even more cases per 1000 live births with substantial geographical variations [4]. Neonatal GBS diseases remain a global public health concern despite a 70% reduction following successful implementation of intrapartum prophylaxis [4-8]. On the other hand there are raised concerns suggesting that the widespread use of antibiotics might increase the frequencies of non-GBS or antimicrobial-resistant pathogens [9]. In the USA the case-fatality ratio for EOS ranged from below 5% among cases of bacteremia to over 15% among cases of Gram negative meningitis [9, 10].

Recently, Murphy and Weiner defined normal values for evaluation of EOS as white blood cell counts (WBC) ranging from 6000 to 30000/µL and an immature to total neutrophil ratio (IT-ratio) below 0.2 [11]. Two negative IT-ratios and a negative blood culture at 24 hours demonstrated to be indicative for a non-infected neonate. Twenty-three of 3154 neonates of this study were diagnosed as having culture proven EOS and all of them had at least one abnormal WBC counts except one E.coli positive neonate. These findings are in contrast to results of our group reporting abnormal WBC and IT-ratio as part of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in only 43% of all neonates with culture-proven EOS and in 39% when defining normal WBC counts as between 9000 and 34000/μL [12, 13]. This raises the question whether there are pathogen-associated laboratory findings that significantly influence interpretation of routine laboratory marker.

Thus, we aimed to identify laboratory and clinical characteristics of different pathogens associated with EOS of the newborn.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cohort of newborns with blood-culture proven EOS collected at a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital over a 18-year time period was retrospectively analyzed regarding laboratory and clinical parameters associated with the identified pathogen. Only inborn neonates admitted within 24 hours of age having diagnosis of clinical and blood culture proven EOS were included for analysis Exclusion criteria were missing or incomplete documentation, a culture-negative clinical sepsis and an unknown state of infection.

Laboratory and Clinical Parameter

For analysis of laboratory marker routine parameter available included WBC count, absolute neutrophil count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and IT-ratio. Values were calculated for day 1, 2, 3 (<24, 24-48, and 48-72 hours) and for maximum and lowest values within the time period of 72 hours of age.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 20 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were obtained for all categorical variables. Statistical significance was determined for unadjusted comparisons by Mann-Whitney-U-test for continuous variables and by Fisher´s exact test for categorical variables. The significance level was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

During the study period 125 of 10,555 hospitalized newborns (1.18%) of a catchment area of approximately 153,000 births were identified with culture-proven EOS (incidence 0.8 per 1,000 live births); of whom 100 had GBS infection (80%), 11 E. coli (8.8%), eight enterococci (6.4%), and six other pathogens (4.8%). Gram positive pathogens were predominant (111/125, 88.8%). Perinatal data of the study population are shown in Table 1. Pathogens identified are given in Table 2.

Laboratory Findings

WBC, IT-ratio, and CRP values did not differ between groups (GBS vs.E. coli vs. other pathogens - enterococci and other pathogens grouped together) within the first 72 hours of life. Median CRP values were 30.2, 28.5, and 27.2 mg/L, respectively. WBC values were 17.7, 11.8, and 18.6 x 106/L, and IT-ratio 0.24, 0.21, and 0.24, respectively. Differences between laboratory findings in correlation to pathogens are summarized in Table 3. Presence of high or low WBC was significantly less found compared to IT-ratio >0.2 in GBS (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively) and E.coli cases (p=0.013 and 0.014, respectively). In the group of other pathogens no differences were found. High WBC values were found more commonly in all groups compared to low WBC (p=0.015, 0.013, and 0.001, respectively).

Table 3.

Differences between laboratory findings in 125 neonates with early-onset sepsis in correlation to pathogens.

GBS
n=100

E. coli
n=11

Others
n=14

p-value

WBC >30.0 (x 106/L)

25

0

21

n.s. (0.055*)

WBC <9.0 (x 106/L)

13

36

29

0.014*

IT-ratio >0.2

41

36

43

n.s.

Thrombocytopenia
(<150 x 106/L)

6

0

14

n.s.

Clinical Findings

The rate of term infants was 58%, 27%, and 43% in GBS, E. coli, and other pathogens EOS, respectively. VLBW infants were found in GBS, E.coli, and other pathogens EOS in 16%, 55%, and 46%, respectively. Gram positive pathogens were common found in late preterm and term infants (84%), and gram negative pathogens in VLBW infants (64%). Gestational age and birth weight were significantly lower in E. coli compared to GBS EOS (median 32 vs. 38 weeks, p=0.005, and 1836 vs. 3095 grams, p=0.031, and between other pathogens and GBS (35 vs. 38 weeks, p=0.035, and 2240 vs. 3095 grams, p=0.022). Male gender did not differ between groups (GBS, E.coli, and other pathogens 57, 55, and 71 percent, respectively).

Tachycardia and bradycardia were found in 13% and 5% of cases, tachypnea and apneas in 71% and 24%, arterial hypotension in 44%, and fever in 11%, respectively. Differences between pathogens were not significant. Median temperature in case of fever was 38.7 °C. The median duration of antibiotic treatment was 10 days.

Complications of EOS

Septic shock was diagnosed in 4.0%, multi-organ failure in 8.0%, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy in 1.6%, and renal failure in 5.6%, differences between pathogens not significant. Neurological complications including seizures, intra-/periventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy were diagnosed in 5.6%, 18%, 2.4%, and 4.0%. Hemorrhages were significantly more common found in E. coli and other pathogens compared with GBS EOS (36 and 36 vs. 13%, p=0.015 and 0.045, respectively). Periventricular leukomalacia and seizures were significantly more often diagnosed in other pathogens compared with GBS EOS (1.0 vs. 14%, p=0.039, and 4.0 vs. 21%, p=0.039, respectively). Overall mortality rate was 7.2% with the highest rate found in VLBW infants (29%). Differences were not significant between pathogens.

Changes Over Time

The rate of EOS was 0.26 percent during the study period (125 out of 48,600 live births). Over the years 1993 to 2011 there was a significant decrease of GBS and gram positive pathogens (p=0.014 and 0.006, Pearson´s correlation coefficient -0.601 and -0.553, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Comparing different pathogens of EOS regarding WBC, IT-ratio, and CRP values did not reveal significant differences. Pathogen-associated characteristics included significantly less low WBC counts in E. coli compared to GBS EOS. An elevated IT-ratio was a more common finding compared to high or low WBC counts in E. coli and GBS EOS. For all pathogens high WBC counts were more commonly found than low counts E. coli EOS was significantly associated with prematurity, and clinical findings were not found to be pathogen-specific. Overall complication and mortality rates were low, and the latter was not different between pathogens.

An analysis of 2164 neonates with EOS and positive culture revealed 60% having a WBC values between 5000 and 19,000/µL, 82% having normal platelet count (between 150,000 and 400,000/µL), and 31% having an IT-ratio below 0.2 [17]. The first (WBC <5500/µL) through fourth vintiles (WBC <8800/µL) were associated with increased odds of EOS in this study. This lower limit is in accordance to our definition of the lower WBC cut-off value and scrutinizes critically a lower limit of 6.000/µL [11]. Additionally the authors observed a significant association with EOS for IT-ratios above 0.24 and for platelet counts below 147,000/µL [17]. Odds ratios for low WBC counts and high IT-ratios associated with infection were 5.38 and 7.97, respectively with high specificity and negative predictive values (73.7%-99.9% and >99.8%), however, sensitivities were low (0.3%-54.5%) for all complete blood cell count indices analyzed. In another study IT-ratio was not able to distinguish between culture positive and negative neonates (p=0.189) and was found to be normal in 29% of infected and abnormal in 53% of uninfected neonates [18]. Summarizing our findings and recent reports reveals IT-ratio being the most important early parameter for the diagnosis of EOS irrespective of the responsible pathogen [11, 17, 19].

We recently demonstrated that small for gestational age (SGA) neonates had lower median WBC counts, lower median neutrophil, and lower median platelet counts during the first 3 days of life compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) neonates with the same finding when analyzing values separately for preterm and term neonates [20]. Interestingly, the SGA neonates were not at an increased risk for culture-proven and clinical sepsis, and in neonates with culture-proven sepsis, WBC, neutrophil, and platelet counts did not differ between SGA and AGA neonates.

The gestational age distribution showing higher rates of term infants in GBS EOS (73 to 80%) is well known and comparable to our data [2, 9]. The finding of lower birth weight and gestational age associated with E.coli infection with subsequently longer hospitalization and a higher rate of mechanical ventilation again is again already well documented [21]. In contrast, we found a significantly higher rate of chorioamnionitis, and could not confirm a higher mortality rate in the E.coli group after adjustment for gestational age. Differences regarding presence of seizures and intraventricular hemorrhages were markedly higher in the E.coli group, but did not reach statistical difference [21]. This is in contrast to our findings and maybe attributable to the higher rate of prematurity. One factor again influenced by the presence of prematurity was the higher rate of hypothermia in the E.coli group, a phenomenon of preterm infants´ reaction to infectious stimuli [22].

We observed a significant decrease of GBS sepsis over the study period without an increase of EOS caused by E.coli neither among term nor preterm infants. In one study, comparing two time periods 1991 to 1993 and 1998 to 2000, a marked reduction in GBS sepsis (from 5.9 to 1.7 per 1000 live births of infants weighing 401 to 1500 g, p<0.001) and an increase in E. coli sepsis (from 3.2 to 6.8 per 1000 live births, p=0.004) was observed without changes of the overall rate of EOS [24]. In another study including 53 cases of E. coli EOS over a long time period (between 1979 and 2006) increases in E. coli EOS rates over the time, and further increases of intrapartum ampicillin exposure and the observation of ampicillin-resistant E. coli were reported [25].

Some limitations of our study have to be mentioned. This is a retrospective analysis performed at a single center that included neonates enrolled over a large time period. Therefore, results can only be extrapolated, with caution, to center-specific characteristics. Positive blood cultures with plausible pathogens are generally accepted as the gold standard as diagnostic criterion for EOS. However, they are known to lack sensitivity, and data are evident that obtaining cultures from neonates might be difficult as sample volumes are small and a substantial number of cultures are contaminated or negative [26, 27]. As a result, the number of culture positive newborns is limited and the true infection rate is probably underestimated.

In conclusion, we observed an abnormal IT-ratio more common than an abnormal WBC count associated both with GBS and E. coli. E. coli was significantly associated with prematurity. Overall mortality rate was low without differences regarding the causative pathogen.

CONTRIBUTIONS

B. Resch was responsible for study design and writing the manuscript.

B.R. performed data collection and presentation of results.

N.H. was responsible for analysis of data and interpretation of results.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

The study was proven by the local Ethical Committee (Nr. 24-434 ex 11/12).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

About the Editor

Biography of Irina V. Kiseleva

Dr. Kiseleva obtained her MS in Microbiology from St Petersburg (SPb) State University, RF, PhD in Virology from Institute of Influenza, SPb, RF and DSci in Virology in Institute of Experimental Medicine (IEM), SPb, RF. She holds a position of Section Chief in IEM. She is also a Professor of SPb University, RF. She published over 280 publications including 40 RF patents. Currently she is the Editor-in-Chief of TOMICROJ, published by Bentham Science Publishers.

Department of Virology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, St. Petersburg, Russia

Quick Links

Indexing Agencies

Press Release

Three more Bentham Science Journals indexed in The Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) by Thomson Reuters

News release date: June 6, 2017

Description:

Thomson Reuters has selected the following Journals published by Bentham Science Publishers for coverage in The Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI). ESCI is a new index launched by Thomson Reuters, extending the universe of publications in Web of Science to include high-quality, peer-reviewed publications of regional importance and in emerging scientific fields.

The Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) is a new index launched by Thomson Reuters, extending the universe of publications in Web of Science to include high-quality, peer-reviewed publications of regional importance and in emerging scientific fields.

Adolescent Psychiatry publishes original research, critical reviews of topics relevant to practitioners, clinical observations with analysis and discussion, analysis of philosophical, ethical or social aspects of the fields of psychiatry and mental health, case reports with discussions, letters, and position papers.

Clarivate Analytics (formerly Thomson Reuters Intellectual Property & Science business) has selected the Bentham Science journal Current Molecular Pharmacology for coverage in the Science Citation Index (SCI). The Science Citation Index (SCI) is a citation index originally produced by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and is made available online through different platforms, such as the Web of Science and SciSearch.

Current Molecular Pharmacology publishes the latest developments in cellular and molecular pharmacology with a major emphasis on the mechanism of action of novel drugs under development, innovative pharmacological technologies, cell signaling, transduction pathway analysis, genomics, proteomics, and metabonomics applications to drug action.

Clarivate Analytics (formerly Thomson Reuters Intellectual Property & Science business) has selected the Bentham Science journal Current Psychiatry Reviews for coverage in The Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI). ESCI is a new index, extending the universe of publications in Web of Science to include high-quality, peer-reviewed publications of importance in emerging scientific fields.

Current Psychiatry Reviews publishes frontier review articles and guest edited issues dedicated to clinical research on all the latest advances on clinical psychiatry and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, epidemiology, clinical care and therapy. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians, psychiatrists and researchers in psychiatry.

MEDLINE indexes Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology

News release date: March 10, 2017

Description:

Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, an important journal published by Bentham Science, is accepted to be included in MEDLINE. MEDLINE is the U.S. National Library of Medicine® (NLM) premier bibliographic database that contains more than 23 million references to journal articles in life sciences with a concentration on biomedicine. A distinctive feature of MEDLINE is that the records are indexed with NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®). For more information, view: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/medline.html/

Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology publishes original manuscripts, reviews, thematic issues, rapid technical notes and commentaries that provide insights into the synthesis, characterization and pharmaceutical (or diagnostic) application of materials at the nanoscale.

Bentham Science among Top 14 Publishers indexed in Scopus

News release date: February 08, 2017

Description:

Scopus recently released information about the published content hosted by the service. According to the information presented, Bentham Science is among the top 14 publishers which have their publications indexed in Scopus.

Bentham Science will continue to expand on its product portfolio in line with its mission to facilitate the publication of latest research around the globe. We are also committed to increasing the exposure of researchers who publish their work with us.

About Scopus

Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature: scientific journals, books and conference proceedings. Delivering a comprehensive overview of the world's research output in the fields of science, technology, medicine, social sciences, and arts and humanities, Scopus features smart tools to track, analyze and visualize research.

Bentham Science Publishers is a major publisher of over 100 peer reviewed journals and 600 eBooks. Some of the notable Bentham Science journals that have received ISI Impact factor (IF) rankings are Current Neuropharmacology (IF 3.75) Current Cancer Drug Targets (IF 3.71), Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, (IF 3.53), Current Medicinal Chemistry (IF 3.46) among other titles.

Testimonials

"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."

. —Daniel Pesut. (Indiana University School of Nursing, USA).

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."

. —Patrice Talaga. (UCB S.A., Belgium).

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."

. —Jeffrey M. Weinberg. (St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA).

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."

. —Debomoy K. Lahiri. (Indiana University School of Medicine, USA).

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."

. —Robert Looney. (Naval Postgraduate School, USA).

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."

. —Richard Reithinger. (Westat, USA).

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."

. —J. Ferwerda. (University of Oxford, UK).

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."

. —Sean L. Kitson. (Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland).

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."

. —Hubert Wolterbeek. (Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands).

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."

. —Alessandro Laviano. (Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy).

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."

. —Philippe Hernigou. (Paris University, France).

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."

. —M. Bendandi. (University Clinic of Navarre, Spain).

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."

. —Peter Chiba. (University of Vienna, Austria).

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."

. —Eduardo A. Castro. (INIFTA, Argentina).

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."

. —Kenji Hashimoto. (Chiba University, Japan).

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."

. —Daniel Shek. (Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong).

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."