Timavus (Benefactor Novi Siti) has proposed elsewhere that we recognize the absurdity of trying to apply the old Regulae Fundamentales to a Sodalitas made up of only a handful of semi-active members. I hope, Timave, that you don't mind me doing this in your place. Since no elections were held, there are no proper officials, and plainly the Regula are not being observed - and indeed, they no longer have their role to play. De facto, we're simply a group of 'old-timers' meeting at a favorite old haunt.

Until the poll on on having elections, I had not realized the disjuncture there was between the few active folk and the "great, uninterested masses". It's possible the SVR may be revived - if it were to be, it would follow some new surge of interest, and would involve new folk. In meantime I think we did right in preserving what it was.

But, re the Regula, they're a dead letter. And I'd like to wrap that up formally. I'm going to offer a Stipulation that we can vote on and that, if carried by a simple majority, will be published here and recorded in the Regulae section on the SVR website.

STIPULATED, by the active Sodales still in attendance at the Fora and the Comitia of the Societas Via Romana, that as of the Kalends Ianuariae AUC 2763 no officers have been elected to serve, that per Regulas the prior officers' terms have all expired, and that as of this hour we recognize that the Regulae Fundamentales are no longer in effect. STIPULATED ALSO, that the surviving active Sodales shall govern and maintain the Societas Via Romana as needed by means of a simple democracy, until such time as these Stipulations are superseded.

Please, if you agree, post your agreement. If you disagree, that also.

Uti Rogas, Iohanne magister; uti rogas. (That's only one vote; the other one's the echo in the auditorium.)

I'll go one further: I don't see the need for -cracy of any sort. I think it's silly to have anything subject to a vote when it takes us a week and a half to scare up seven voters on a measure that needed at least ten to show up. Not ten "pro", not ten "con"...ten voters *total* out of 97 Sodales. We couldn't do it. The four Sodales who've joined since the poll closed out are off the hook. So's anyone who actually voted in the poll, and the fifteen or so people who have even visited the Forum this year. The rest of you...what are you doing here besides cluttering up the database?

I guess that most people who sign up at this board will use it like any other forum on the internet was well. That they could read about and discuss topics they are interested in and that they so find people with like-minded interests. All other boards function with an administrator and several moderators which do not need to be elected. So they do not bother with these regula you had set up here because the majority does not want to recreate the Roman policy virtually but just use it as a forum.

I always said that this takes too much energy out of the forum. The main focus of the remaining active members should be how to revive this board and make it interesting to newbies as well. And with quabbles about elections that will turn people away.

Yes, indeed, to recognize the situation - call a spatha a spatha, you might say - put a proper cap on the Regula - and the era which we've seen fade into absurdity. If we preserve the Regula on line, so it seems to me, there should be an acknowledgment there, too.

If the barest majority is seen, I'll ask Civis Marius to chisel the little Stips in above the Regula.

The winds stir the dust of the Societas.... But it is nice to get a few live responses!

It would entail more than a comment on the Regula page. I'd basically have to redo anything on the site that states or implies that we are an actual entity, with memberships and a constitution. The application form (and process) would go. The Webmail would be for site issues, article submissions if any, and information requests. Would we even maintain an Album Sodalium as such? Would people here still need Roman names? The Board's Comitia section would need to be repurposed; without formal memberships or elections, I'd see no reason to limit access to it. With no Regula and no officers, there'd be nothing to administer but our front end itself (Board, site, or other incarnation[s]).

And there'd be no more freakin' Censuses!!! >({|x-b

Random thought: What would we do with the Forum? Do we really need this whole BB3 setup to handle the current participation level? I could see it as an archive of past discussions; we have a lot of educational and entertaining material here, the sum of our Roman experiences, and if that is not preserved the last nine years will have been for nothing. But our present needs could probably be met just fine on a mailing-list service such as Listserv, Topica (where we began) or Yahoo Groups. How, then, would we integrate the two? OTOH, if we stay with the Forum we won't have that problem...a case could be made either way.

Whether "no Regula" changes everything or almost nothing, however, it does raise the questions of what the Societas *is* at its core, and what it would mean to be a "member" of it, however defined. Then again, these have always been recurring themes for us. Every time we've tweaked the bylaws, it's been a try for better answers. Maybe we'll finally find something that'll stick.

I'd like to suggest that we keep the Comitia limited because I fear, perhaps I am paranoid, that under a pure democracy we could be "invaded" by a manus of only five or so new sodales who could then make decisions without any love of the Societas to guide them. Let us require members to have registered a year before before becoming sodales with access to the Comitia. What do you think?

Decisions about what? About the Forum and the Web site? For that, you have a manus of two: Tibi Draco and myself. Sans the Regula, sans a governmental structure of any kind, there would be no decisions to make about the Societas itself. No elections, no laws, no edicts, no appointments, no Curia, no Comitia, no Censuses, no memberships. We would be on paper what we are now in practice: a Web site with attached message-board. Register it, host it, check the links, update the content. What's to decide, except for either replacing me or finding us some expert help?

'Course, if we keep the Regula, or come up with some other formal definition of membership, I suppose you could make somebody wait a year from the date of Board registration to the effective date of actual membership. You could. But that'd be shooting ourselves in the foot. Most new people will have faded long before then, and we'll have denied ourselves the talent and services of the remainder. The last thing the Societas needs is to suffocate the newbies. The second-to-last thing it needs is to make more work for the admin--or whoever you thought was going to keep track of when everyone's one-year probation was up.

There's no need to re-do the SVR over this. No need to tear anything down, or hunt up all references to the Regula or to us as the SVR. The Stipulations were intended to be our own formal recognition that the Regula - as they stand - are not functional (we have no officers and not even a proper quorum necessary to vote on an issue, etc.).

In my first post, I said: "... the Regula, they're a dead letter." But I should have said,

"... the Regula, they're in abeyance for now."

I didn't mean we should dump them; but it seemed to me although they are not in effect, yet should not be ignored. Doing nothing is just that - ignoring them. And so, if we, as the Active Sodales, recognize the situation, then it's not just anarchy.

In that post, I also put in the Stipulations that they would be made

"... by the active Sodales still in attendance at the Fora and the Comitia of the Societas Via Romana....."

That's us - active, on the Forum, in the Comitia.

As to the question of some hooligans taking over the SVR, there are three impediments to that: 1. You have to be a Sodalis to attend the Comitia which is our current authority - us; 2. The existing Sodales (except for us) don't care; and 3. The only persons (as Marius pointed out) with any actual power are himself and Tiberius Draco.

But it may well be that I am simply over-focused on the Regula, having had to focus on those during my tenure. And it may be that debating them is the very thing Cleo warned us of in her post: "... quabbles about elections that will turn people away."

So, again, vote them up or down? Or modify them? Or tell Iohannes to get off his rostrum? Quid censtitis?

...Oh. Not an Undo; an interregnum. We can do that; we have once before--no, make that twice. In 2756-7 / 2003-4, we actually had an interrex ('twas Q Claudius Locatus) for the month or so before the actual magistrates took office. In 2758 / 2005, of course, there was the whole Concilium situation. We have the ingredients to set up something like an interregnum again, made up of equal parts law and practice.

Certe, anyone who has posted to this thread is a "currently active Sodalis". There may be others; besides us, we have had 11 Sodales visit the Forum this year, for a total of 16, and almost all of them have posted. (We have one newbie who hasn't yet; but she and I have been corresponding about the site, so I know she's still interested.)

Visitors this year (as of 10 Apr):

Tiberius Livius Nero (2 posts), Jan 05, 2010

Lucia Livia Plauta (39 posts), Jan 06, 2010

Gaius Iulius Tabernarius (88), Jan 20, 2010

Tiberius Dionysius Draco (458), Mar 10, 2010

Marcus Octavius Gracchus (14), Mar 31, 2010

Gnaeus Dionysius Draco (1618), Mar 14, 2010

Caius Aelius Ericius (61), Mar 17, 2010 9:12 pm

Aula Iunia Gallica (0), Mar 19, 2010

Spurius Mamilius Lucanus (27), Mar 22, 2010

Caia Valeria Aenea (4), Apr 02, 2010

Quintus Servilius Priscus (208), Apr 07, 2010

Cleopatra Aelia (351), Apr 08, 2010

Marcus Lupinius Paulus (169), Apr 09, 2010

Primus Aurelius Timavus (513), Apr 10, 2010

Valerius Claudius Iohanes (666), Apr 10, 2010

Aldus Marius (2150), Apr 10, 2010

We've also had five Sodales register here (four of them in the last month) who haven't actually visited yet. Hence, as with so much else around here, it depends on how you're counting. I'll let the management make that call.

Well, how about everyone on your list, plus the four newbies who registered in the last month, plus any conditores who haven't visited recently? That would be a good start. If any folks who would qualify ex officio show up, like maybe Piscinus, and show interest, we could later add them to the list.

Of course - I was forgetting my SVR history - the Interrex! And Marius divined it better than I - in effect, given these 'res novae' of late, an Interrex would be the answer. Why didn't I think of that? (Well, you don't have to answer that question! )

As to who is active, and thereby who will be part of this 'group Interrex', this 'cor Sodalitatis' if I may, I think we might do well to err on the exclusive side: Include (1) those who answered the poll on elections http://www.societasviaromana.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1877 and (2) those on Marius's list, above. These folk have at least been here and given a nod or a glance. Primave, I think that adding others who are distracted and uninterested in all this stuff - as they may well be, as Cleo pointed out - would once again just cloud the process.

I'm afraid "those who answered the poll on elections" is going to be a rather elusive group to pin down...or did you mean the discussion topic and not the poll itself? Not even the Mighty Admin gets to see who voted how on the poll; just totals and percentages--thank goodness! >' ({(:-)

Some of the Conditores haven't been here in four years. I don't suggest waiting on them. In any case, didn't we agree, a long long time ago (the year of Gn Draco's retirement and the Concilium reforms) that the Society has and should have no Indispensable Men? Really, I think at least part of why they've faded (those who have) was to wean us off of them, to make room for others--us--to take the lead, to break away from having to carry the ultimate responsibility and accountability for this place. We do neither the absent Conditores nor the Societas any favors by sitting around waiting for them to come back and save us.> I just figured the admins can see everything!Na; and some of the things I *can* see, I wish I hadn't!! >({|;-]