Overview:85%
+ of all email traffic is SPAM. It has been the fastest growing portion of
email use for years. SPAM filters are only marginally effective. They are
particularly ineffective at separating SPAM from desirable incoming email
originating from new correspondents. Whitelists and blacklists are ineffective
for this purpose, because who knows the email address of their next new correspondent?
The most difficult problem is protecting addresses which must be open to
messages from new senders, due to the role of their human lessees.

There is no meaningful legal penalty for SPAM emitters (or for
telemarketers, or junk snail mailers). Fortunately, SPAM avoidance, along with
SPAM mitigation can reduce the annoyance and expense to reasonable levels, even
without politicians help.

Anti-SPAM tactics
grouped by user class. What type is your use?

Those who seek new
correspondents, but whose relationship with correspondents is long lived (such
as commercial sales personnel): the best choice is to avoid attracting SPAM for
as long as possible. Dealing with the onslaught, should it start, is unsatisfying, time-consuming, and only partially
effective. Morphing email addresses to dodge SPAM
disrupts existing relationships valued by these users.Blended transitions can be used: a primary
email address that has become SPAM plagued is superseded by a fresh (SPAM free)
address, but still monitored for the duration of many few sales cycles.

Those who seek new
correspondents, but whose relationship with correspondents is short lived (such
as retail sales personnel): morphing email addresses to dodge SPAM is minimally
disruptive to existing relationships, because they are not persistent over
time. Blended transitions can be used: a primary email address that has become
SPAM plagued is superseded by a fresh (SPAM free) address, but still monitored
for the duration of a few sales cycles.

Those with a relatively
static list of correspondents: SPAM filters
employing whitelists are quite effective.Such users can be less careful about how they disclose their addresses,
because they can set a filter to only accept email from addresses that are
familiar. Such users tend to be mainly social users. For these people changing
email addresses can be disruptive to correspondents, because they manage
address books poorly, or not at all.

All users can
benefit from using secondary, or disposable addresses
for high-risk correspondence, such as that described below.

Major attractors of
SPAM in descending order of risk. Avoid letting
addresses you care about fall into these traps:

§Avoid listing, or allowing your address to be
posted on any web site in text and/or via un-encoded mailto. Email addresses
can be listed on websites, and remain SPAM resistant, if the listing is done
properly, in a
manner not consistent with the latest SPAM avoidance techniques. It is best to
not use any address you care about if it will be listed carelessly on a
website. (Disposable email addresses are best for these purposes). The
test is this: if you can copy and paste the text of your address from the web
site, it is harvestable by SPAM robots, which crawl every web site on the
planet eventually. This is distinct from clicking on a link which opens a
pre-addressed new message in your email application.

§Avoid listing, or allowing your address to be
posted on any blog. Blogs
and USENET are structured, threaded websites, so they represent risk if they
expose email addresses in text and or un-encoded mailto: They become attractive
to SPAMers when the quantity or quality of addresses listed on them becomes
sizeable. It is
best to not use any address you care about if it will appear in a blog. (Disposable
email addresses are best for these purposes).

§Avoid entering email addresses you care about
into webforms,
especially e-commerce sites, music download sites, chat rooms, social
networking sites, etc. Disposable email addresses are best for these purposes.
Consider the risk of revealing your complete and true human name as well,
particularly if it is unique. A unique human name can be easy to find a
physical address for.

§Avoid listing of email addresses you care
about on widely distributed literature (rosters, advertisements, business
cards, etc) unless the benefit outweighs the risk. Your literature can direct
business prospects to a website, from which they can obtain your current email
address.

§Avoid allowing your email address you care about to be exposed in emails sent to groups by senders
who include it in the TO or CC fields (they should use BCC instead)

§Avoid listserve subscriber lists that can be
poached. This is a small portion of listserves, usually managed by fumblers. If
in doubt, use a disposable
email address for this purpose.

§Avoid listserve subscriber lists intentionally
co-opted by administrators. This is a small portion of listserves, usually
managed by salespeople or SPAMers masquerading as something else. If in doubt,
use a disposable
email address for this purpose.

§Avoid entering or allowing an email address you
care about into any
third party web-based address book, such as evite.com

§Never
reply to any SPAM for any reason, even if it tempts you with offers to
"unsubscribe". Replying includes enabling any auto-reply,
vacation-response, etc.

What is email good
for if I have to observe all these caveats?Consider separating your usage into tiers.
Keep one address for uses where the effort and disruption of change is high (persistent
social and business relationships with humans). Use less permanent addresses for higher risk correspondence (such as
e-commerce) with organizations where your relationship is sporadic, or short
lived. Most email providers make multiple addresses available to you. Most
email applications allow you to send from more than one address.
(See the section below on selecting and morphing email addresses).

E-commerce purchasing without SPAM: In most cases, the email address used needs only
remain valid for the duration of the transaction. Why risk SPAM from a vendor’s
abuse of your address? Simply use a disposable addresses
for tasks that do not require persistence. Yahoo.com, hotmail.com, gmail.com, etc offer these.

But protecting my email address is less important to me that
using it! Have your
cake(s) and eat them too! Use secondary, or disposable addresses
for high risk correspondence, such as that described below. If you like, use
free addresses from various vendors, via webmail. Most email providers offer
multiple addresses at no additional charge. Configure and use them for
different purposes. You will find that some of your uses attract SPAM, while
some do not. By segmenting the problem, more specific and effective tactics can
be applied. Examples of common functions for addresses:

4social@yourdomain.com

4ecommerce@freedisposableaddress.com

4listserves@yourdomain.com

4sales@yourdomain.com

When starting with a fresh email address: Avoidance of the problem is the best tactic when
starting with a fresh address. Being careless, attracting SPAM, and then trying
to limit the irritation with SPAM filters is unsatisfying, time consuming and
only partially effective. The reason is that SPAM filters tend to snag email
you wanted to see. Tuning them is difficult and imprecise. If you use addresses
you care about carefully and specifically, a SPAM problem is less likely to
arise.

Periodically start
with a clean slate by simply morphing addresses when they
start picking up SPAM.

Do not use primary ISP (DSL, cable provider) email address for anything
other than administrative purposes. Never give it to anyone. If it becomes SPAM
infested, you cannot abandon it, because you need it to get important account
notices from your Internet Service Provider (ISP). Create secondary addresses
in the beginning, and use them exclusively, morphing as necessary.

Avoid
creating addresses comprised solely of a dictionary word.
Avoid constructing the portion preceding the @ solely of dictionary word(s) or
common human names of any language, spelled forwards or backwards. Uniqueness
is desirable! This is why the address jane@yourdomain.com is a poor
choice. Jane4riverz2007@yourdomain.com is a better choice. Placing your full
human name in an email address has profound security implications; consider
them carefully!

Avoid configuring computer operating systems with valid personal identifying
information: Entering your full name and any valid unique identifying
information (phone number, snail mail address, email address) into a
workstation's operating system configuration pages is a bad idea, because
various methods allow outsiders to pry while you are browsing. During
configuration of an operating system (examples include Windows XP, Vista, Mac
OSX), if the forms will not allow blanks, enter decoys. Examples include:

NoFirstName

NoSurName

123 anywhere Street

San Francisco CA
94123

987-654-3210

notme@notmydomain.com

Email servers
routinely carry the workstation name in email headers, no matter which address
email is sent from. Workstation names are often generated from human names
entered during initial configuration of the machine.Ever wonder how you got SPAM this week specific to products you
searched for via web last week, even though you didn't enter your email address
in any of the web sites you visited? Not following the recommendations in this
paragraph enables such pilfering. Anti-Spyware scanners, Phishing filters, and
Privacy Filters are imperfect, and require effort to tune. Preventing the
problem is easier than fixing it after occurrence.

We are ready to
assist you in prevention of SPAM and security risks, and
mitigation of existing SPAM and security problems. For all your computer needs,
contact us: