*'''Keep'''. Someone tagged this article for deletion as part of Vigilante Week. Everyone I've shown it to thinks it's hilarious. Maybe I'm biased -- I am a music nerd and I wrote it -- but I say KEEP! [[User:The Realms of Gold|The Realms of Gold]] 21:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.

If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:

Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.

Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.

Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.

To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.

If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions.This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty.Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept.You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.

Keep. Someone tagged this article for deletion as part of Vigilante Week. Everyone I've shown it to thinks it's hilarious. Maybe I'm biased -- I am a music nerd and I wrote it -- but I say KEEP! The Realms of Gold 21:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep. Don't see what's wrong here. And don't forget to tag articles you put on VFD with the {{VFD}} template. --T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep. Big fat keep, in fact. This is funny. And the picture of the bears shooting a cannon at unicorns is great. (Whoops -- the bears probably appeared in Bears vs. Unicorns Conflict first, so it's...well, not plagiarism, but something.) ----OEJ 00:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep Maybe Somehow I think this can't be VFDed as I think this may be a in joke. I'll ask Famine the creator of this article about it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 00:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep I think someone's just going to make this again either way. The first sentence got me, they slow down the site and stuff when they actually keep it moving (maybe they stop it from going so fast that it actually crashes). Of course, something like this would need the help of actual bureaucrats that can laugh at what they write about themselves. Conniving 20:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete

Nom & Delete. Crap. This is the type of crap I'd QVFD, but it would leave a nasty red link on the list of admins. They should get rid of the link on that page if it is deleted SirManforman 00:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete, or, rather, redirect to The Bureaucracy Channel. That keeps the redlinks from buzzing around pesting admins. ----OEJ 00:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep. Sigh. Not very good, not very long, but has two good jokes in it: F8==fate and Unsafe Mode. Most of the keyboard series are short, and this one fits the (unfortunate) mold.----OEJ 00:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep - LMAO, why in the world do you hate this one Manforman? —The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete I suppose. Awfully short and silly. ----OEJ 00:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete. I know it's in a series, but if that series is to be kept, it should have some redeeming qualities, and I see none here. --SirUnderUser(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Comments

The problem with deleting articles which appear on a template -- like the keyboard template -- is that the reason for the template to exist gradually erodes. If the keyboard template is riddled with redlinks, it seems silly to have it at all. ----OEJ 00:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Having redlinks on such templates is a good way to get someone reading a similar article to notice it and have a go at writing it themselves (I count 2 or 3 redlinks on the keyboard template out of over 100). Deleting the template spoils the series, and the other option is to combine them all into one page, which would be rather messy for anyone trying to actually read it, though might appeal to those attempting to "un-clutter" the wiki. There isn't a lot of content on each individual page, but that's because it's really a whole series about the keyboard keys strung over 100 or so pages. Nobody's expecting a feature here. •Spang•☃•talk•09:48, 05 Oct 2007

keep damnit* It's funny. They make fun of the lyrics. Knowig what the lyrics are helps the humor =__= Lord Gneo 05:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Delete

Killplzkthx. I can't believe I read all this. 75% of it is made-up lyrics about sucking cock, and the other 25% is name-dropping random nonsense. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 20:30 Oct 04, 2007