Why I Love Dumb, Passive Do-Nothing Houses

Posted by Shawna Henderson on March 03, 2015

A cross-section of the Saskatchewan Conservation House.

I've had a decades-long love affair with dumb, passive houses. Passive. As in do-nothing. I love the design challenge of making do with the site and the microclimates that a house can be tucked into, the available solar gain, the building envelope. The minimal interjection of technology to maintain comfort has always been appealing to me, mainly because I'm selectively cheap and lazy. I don't want to do anything that costs me money over and over again (I like to purchase once and be done with it), and I’m ridiculously allergic to setting up anything that resembles a programmable remote control. So it's very appealing to read articles that have headlines like: In praise of the Dumb House and In the age of 'smart' homes, sometimes dumb is best.

Having been a student in the time of the Advanced House projects, worked on several demonstration projects in one role or another, and reported on a whole lot more, one of the things that has continually struck me was the preponderance of groovy technological fixes. In many cases, 'demonstration house' equals gadget-driven, and some projects didn't/don’t perform as well as predicted because of conflicts and phantom or unanticipated baseload energy use. That's fine and as it should be, because they are experiments. It’s my observation, though, that continually playing with more gadgets (and don’t get me wrong – I love me a good gadget) without changing fundamental thinking about the building envelope continually keeps high-performance housing in the market margins. So it pleases me no end to hear that Canadian Net Zero Energy builders like Avalon Master Builder who are into their 'second generation' iteration of production NZE houses have backed off on the technology requirements and really focussed on the envelope to be the provider of comfort and the bearer of lower capital costs.

Simplifying mechanicals is a challenge, because when you drop space conditioning loads dramatically, you have to rely on modelling data to figure out what new configuration of heating/cooling equipment will actually keep occupants comfortable. And that's not necessarily within the comfort zone of the builder. Certainly homeowners look askance at houses without big, robust, central heating systems, because that's what we're accustomed to, and nobody wants to invest in a new house that might not be able to maintain comfort levels. But now that some builders have NZE and Passive Houses and such under their belts, things are changing.

This is great, because Canadians were making dumb houses back in the 1970s. The Saskatchewan Research Council, along with the University of Regina and the University of Saskatchewan let a bunch of visionaries that included Harold Orr (of ‘chainsaw retrofit’ fame) loose on a project that became known as the Saskatchewan Conservation House.

Consuming just 15% of the energy of comparable houses in Regina at the time, the SCH was built with a minimized surface-to-volume ratio, R-40 walls, R-60 ceiling, a nearly airtight envelope and no furnace. A small hot water system heats the cube-shaped house. Optimizing solar gain was considered in everything from window placement to siting the house and siding colour.

With a house like this, a smart thermostat like a NEST is going to be bored spitless and represents a significant waste of capital and operating costs. The ambient temperature stays constant in a well-designed building envelope, meaning there would be nothing for the NEST to do but spin the electricity meter. Paul Dowsett, principal of Sustainable.TO Architecture + Building, notes in the Treehugger article (linked above) that smart technology is expensive to purchase, maintain and costs energy to operate. Dumb systems are usually less expensive to purchase, and are easier (ie, cheaper) to maintain and don’t typically cost anything operate. It’s even better than ‘plug and play’ in my books – it’s ‘build and forget’.

Comments

Enter your comments in the box below:

(Please note that all blog entries and comments are subject to review prior to posting.)

Posted By:

Email:

Your Comment:

While we will do our best to monitor all comments and blog posts for accuracy and relevancy, Home Energy is not responsible for content posted by our readers or third parties. Home Energy reserves the right to edit or remove comments or blog posts that do not meet our community guidelines.

I've had a decades-long love affair with dumb, passive houses. Passive. As in do-nothing. I love the design challenge of making do with the site and the microclimates that a house can be tucked into, the available solar gain, the building envelope. The minimal interjection of technology to maintain comfort has always been appealing to me, mainly because I'm selectively cheap and lazy. I don't want to do anything that costs ...[continue reading]

The U.S. Department of Energy recently announced the release of a new online simulation tool that provides free, targeted training and testing to individuals interested in providing the Home Energy Score – a standard energy efficiency assessment and score generated only by qualifying professionals. The Home Energy Score Simulation Training (the Sim) lets candidates walk through different virtual homes with numerous combinations of energy-related characteristics. The Sim trains candidates on skills specifically required to ...[continue reading]

From the rustic 1850s pump shower to the 1920s Humphrey automatic to today’s modern units, water heaters have made great strides in performance and efficiency. On April 16, 2015, water heaters will take the next great stride when manufacturers must comply with new Department of Energy (DOE) efficiency standards. The most common water heaters manufactured on and after this date will get a modest boost in efficiency, while units over 55 ...[continue reading]

Building owners throughout the world are increasingly turning to the Passive House standard. This past autumn, the number of square meters that have been certified internationally based on the highly efficient standard reached one million. The symbolic threshold was crossed with the certification of the Midori Haus in Santa Cruz, California. Almost 25 years after the construction of a prototype house in Darmstadt, tens of thousands of tenants and homeowners continue to benefit from the low ...[continue reading]

The transmission utility responsible for the electricity infrastructure of much of Texas has an idea that could change the power industry. Oncor, who is responsible for transmitting power to large parts of the state including the Dallas/Fort Worth area wants to invest billions of dollars in large scale battery storage to help manage the uneven demand for electricity and improve the reliability of the region's electric grid. Batteries would allow the utility ...[continue reading]

A year ago I started a project to reduce the energy consumption in my condo. I’ve gone through two keys steps already: measuring the energy I currently use and taking steps to reduce the energy used for heating (HVAC)). My next main area of focus was on lighting. Lighting accounts for approximately 20% of energy use, both in residential and commercial infrastructure. In order to reduce the energy used by lighting, I implemented ...[continue reading]

If I could retrofit my house and install a Sprinkler System I would do it in a New York minute. Sprinkler systems save lives and prevent fires from spreading, plain and simple. They are not complicated systems. They work by putting water on fire.[continue reading]

The past year has been an exciting journey for me – after buying my first place (an older {1985} brick, 850 sqft condo, in a walkable part of Ottawa) I went to work renovating it to both my aesthetic tastes as well as sustainable passions. I finally feel like I’ve accomplished what I set out to do – create a home that has its own story, which has been so uniquely woven into mine.
I ...[continue reading]