Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Defamation is EXTREMELY hard to prove. Again, just like the Zimmerman trial you have a failure to understand the law.

Just because someone says something mean and incorrect about someone isn't enough to convict for defamation.

For defamation to be proven they must first prove malice, the want to blatantly do harm to someone or their reputation. The next thing is that actual damage did occur, this is the hardest to prove.

Now even if those two things are proven there are still exceptions. Like if the person defamed is a celebrity or public figure.

Needless to say the fact that she was found guilty of defamation is very telling.

Now onto her statements. The facts did not support her story. That is why the Grand Jury refused to indict her. The fact that a Grand Jury, who only hears from the prosecution, refused to indict again is telling. Add to it that both of her lawyers have received admonishment for their statements by the New York Bar Association, not really a conservative institution.

Your defense of her is paper thin against a mountain of evidence that she and her lawyers concoted a story.

I'm not suggesting that at all. Us Euro's are notorious for mistreating other races and when we get caught we will conspire to create a bunch of lies so that we can punish the person we offended. Brawley told the truth. The police and others threatened to kill her and her family if she didn't recant. She recanted and to teach the world the strength of Euro power the Euro's sued her.

I think he really believes this stuff he posts. There no sense of him being sarcastic or tongue in cheek about his posts. He just really feels guilt for the sins of all white people. What a terrible burden to have your parents put on you.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

"Among these were that the rape kit results did not indicate sexual assault. Additionally, despite her claim of having been held captive for days, Brawley was not suffering from hypothermia, was well-nourished, and appeared to have brushed her teeth recently. Despite her clothing being charred, there were no burns on her body. Although a shoe she was wearing was cut through, Brawley had no injuries to her foot. The racial epithets written on her were upside down, which led to suspicion that Brawley had written the words. Testimony from her schoolmates indicated she had attended a local party during the time of her supposed abduction. One witness claimed to have observed Brawley's climbing into the garbage bag.[18] Brawley never testified.[19]"

Also, why didn't Al Sharpton come to her defense during the defamation suit or now to help her pay the bills? Could it be he is an opportunist and was a national figure and didn't need her anymore?

You keep repeating that you are a "Euro-trash racist"
and previously you said you had Scottish ancestors.

When can the rest of us Euro-peon Americans expect YOUR APOLOGY FOR SCOTTISH WHITE SLAVE TRADING?

You don't speak for the rest of us Euros, YOU only speak for yourself. And if you are "outraged" at black slavery, then you MUST also be outraged at your ancestors trading in WHITE SLAVES.

As a Euro-peon American, I DEMAND YOU PAY ME REPARATIONS FOR YOUR ANCESTORS ACTIONS AND YOU PUBLICLY APOLIGIZE FOR YOUR SCOTTISH ANCESTORS OWNING WHITE SLAVES.

White Slavery: The Scottish Slaves of England and Americas
There were hundreds of thousands of Scots sold into slavery during Colonial America. White slavery to the American Colonies occurred as early as 1630 in Scotland.

According to the Egerton manuscript, British Museum, the enactment of 1652: it may be lawful for two or more justices of peace within any county, citty or towne, corporate belonging to the commonwealth to from tyme to tyme by warrant cause to be apprehended, seized on and detained all and every person or persons that shall be found begging and vagrant.. in any towne, parish or place to be conveyed into the Port of London, or unto any other port from where such person or persons may be shipped into a forraign collonie or plantation.

The judges of Edinburgh Scotland during the years 1662-1665 ordered the enslavement and shipment to the colonies a large number of rogues and others who made life unpleasant for the British upper class. (Register for the Privy Council of Scotland, third series, vol. 1, p 181, vol. 2, p 101)."

"In 1794, U.S.-born inventor Eli Whitney (1765-1825) patented the cotton gin, a machine that revolutionized the production of cotton by greatly speeding up the process of removing seeds from cotton fiber. By the mid-19th century, cotton had become America's leading export. Despite its success, the gin made little money for Whitney due to patent-infringement issues. Also, his invention offered Southern planters a justification to maintain and expand slavery even as a growing number of Americans supported its abolition."

The cotton gin was invented in 1793, well after slavery had been established in this country. The whole idea of slavery is about greed, anyway. Force people to do work for you for no pay while you sip on mint julips and chase after the southern belles. Us Euro's tried to enslave the Native Americans first, but they weren't physically capable of being slaves. So instead they captured or bought Black Africans, shipped them thousands of miles from their homes so they couldn't go back and beat the shit out of them for centuries so us Euro's of the day could live like aristocrats. The slave who invented the cotton gin and his family were tortured until the slave came up with a way to effectively remove the seeds from cotton pods. Walla, the cotton gin. The Black inventor and his family remained in slavery, so, why would a Black Man voluntarily invent something that was going to keep him and his family enslaved.

I was not born yet, my ancestors were not born yet, and all those generations ago, my ancesters WERE STILL IN EUROPE.

NONE of my "Euro" ancestors owned slaves. NONE of my "Euro" ancestors had set foot in America. NONE of my "Euro" ancestors had seen a native American.

Apparently YOU COME FROM A RACIST LINE OF EURO-TRASH SLAVE OWNING SCUMBAGS but my ancestors were not and will not be included in your xenophobic view of European-Americans. So DO NOT include me in your racist blanket statements about "us Euros" because I have nothing to do with your RACIST BLACK HATING SLAVE OWNING ANCESTRY.

Get it?

So I'll ask your ignorant ass, "why would a Black Man voluntarily invent something that was going to keep him and his family enslaved."?
YOU said a black man invented the cotton gin. Therefore YOU are accusing a black man of the increase in Slavery that the History Channel Website says resulted from that black man inventing the cotton gin.

He calls me a Euro and blames me for slavery yet my ancestry that has been in the US the longest were Dutch pilgrims who did not own slaves, and fought in both the Revolutionary and Civil War out of Pennsylvania. That's some real support of slavery there.

My other ancestors were immigrants (German and Irish) who came both during and after the Civil War and even then settled in slave states of New York and Ohio.

"Also, his invention offered Southern planters a justification to maintain and expand slavery even as a growing number of Americans supported its abolition."

It gave them an excuse to maintain and expand slavery. Their lazy butts never did one day of work. Slavery still exists in the United States. If a Black Man steals a loaf of bread he'll recieve 10 years in jail working for someone for 3 cents an hour.

It's inconvenient for you because an indentured servant is still a slave.

"Slavery still exists in the United States." And you will back this claim up with nothing. Well maybe a story about a "buddy" who had an elaborate set of circumstances happen to them, of which you will not discuss the details.

The first step to a cure is recognize the illness that you have, Libs. Once you do that and find a suitable program there may be hope for you. If you think you are so right, go to the corner of Lawrence and Lincoln Ave.'s and hug the first African American you see. Carry Fredo with you.

You're the racist bigot here.
You have admitted it repeatedly and wear it proudly like a badge of dis-honor.
How about you go hang out on the corner of Lawrence and Lincoln, advertize your willingness to "apologize" for being white and see what that gets your cracker ass.

I have been at Lawrence and Lincoln many times and nothing has happened. See how your bigoted mind works. You automatically assume something bad will happen. That's not true. I can drive down Indian Road in Ottawa Hills and possibly get shot in the back for exceeding the speed limit.

Any statement I make is the opinion of me exercising my first amendment right to freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and is generally permitted.

Copyright 2007-2016 - The site owner and other users may or may not endorse other posts on this site. Don't assume that they know, like and support everything posted here (you know what happens when you assume?). Don't like something said here? Read this.