The Obama administration has announced that it is taking the unbelievable role of pushing the homosexual agenda around the world and punishing countries that don't comply.

Back in July, MassResistance reported how the Pakistanis angrily denounced the US Embassy's open homosexual parties as "cultural terrorism." Well, that was just the beginning.

Now, foreign countries which seek to protect their citizens against homosexuality and the homosexual movement will be actively confronted by America's State Department, foreign service, and other federal departments, according to a Presidential Memorandum released by the Obama Administration announced on Dec. 6.

Unless countries around the world subordinate their own social and religious values to U.S. demands that they embrace homosexuality and the homosexual movement, they can expect interference from the US government in their internal affairs and punishment -- using foreign aid and in international commerce, trade, banking, travel restrictions, and the like.

Mirroring the homosexual lobby's (and the Left's) traditional tactics, Obama is characterizing this as a "civil rights" quest for homosexuality and transgenderism.

Obama says in the memo:

"I declared before heads of state gathered at the United nations, 'no country should deny people their rights because of who they love' . . . Under my Administration, agencies engaged abroad have already begun taking action . . . as we in the United States bring our tools to bear to vigorously advance this goal.

"Back in July, MassResistance reported how the Pakistanis angrily denounced the US Embassy's open homosexual parties as 'cultural terrorism.'"

Our effete, political class in action. Those who don't make it in big, global business are relegated by their families to foreign diplomacy and other jobs in the various levels of government. Have fun. Enjoy the slide. Starve the B.

7
posted on 03/30/2012 8:34:53 PM PDT
by familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)

Well, I’m really glad to see Obama and Hillary are working hard on these sorts of basic human rights...now that they’ve got women being beaten/killed, castrated, mutilated, burned, enslaved, degraded, etc. under control worldwide.

9
posted on 03/30/2012 9:40:22 PM PDT
by The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")

May be a moot point but the photo of Kathleen Sebelius at podium addressing the LGBT Health Conference raising does she understand Jefferson? She was speaking in celebration of
the Gay and Lesbian lifestyle choice. behind a podium that named Jefferson.And it was Jefferson who proposed A Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments in the State of VA. including “whosoever shall be guilty of rape,polygamy,or sodomy with a man or woman,shall be punished; if a man -by castration,if a woman,by boring through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch in diameter at the least. (Sec.XIV) -See America’s Christian History: the Untold Story Gary DeMar Editor American vision ,1995 p. 165-167 Es verdad they were probably thanking the their Ashtaroth That Jefferson and his Bill were defeated-perhaps in ignorance that the “old and bloody law “as Madison spoke of it , allowed those guilty of Sodomy with a man or a woman be put to death in Virginia (as in most of the original States. )

TUESDAY, MARCH 16, 2010
Gay Marriage STILL Not Legal in Mass.!
For years now — since 2005 — the homosexual lobby has filed and refiled its bill to legalize “gay marriage” in Massachusetts. They know that the law as it now stands refers to “man/woman”, “husband/wife” relationships as marriage. Today, the Judiciary Committee once again sent the bill to “study” — meaning, they killed it. But the very existence of this bill over the years confirms that we are correct that “gay marriage” has never been made legal in Massachusetts.http://massresistance.blogspot.com/2010/03/confirmed-today-gay-marriage-still-not.html

12
posted on 03/31/2012 6:37:45 AM PDT
by massmike
(Massachusetts: If they had just kept hanging witches a bit longer...........)

No, the Massachusetts laws were never changed. The state constitution clearly says that only the legislature can change laws relating to marriage, and no such law was passed or even proposed.

Romney sent a letter to town clerks and Justices of the Peace, telling them they had better start signing gay marriage licenses or he’d get their jobs. And that was the beginning of gay marriage in the USA.

No, the Massachusetts laws were never changed. The state constitution clearly says that only the legislature can change laws relating to marriage, and no such law was passed or even proposed.

Romney sent a letter to town clerks and Justices of the Peace, telling them they had better start signing gay marriage licenses or hed get their jobs. And that was the beginning of gay marriage in the USA.

You make is sound as if Romney initiated Gay marriage in Massachusetts.

The truth is the homos took the State to court. They had an ally in the South Africn born Margaret Marshall, the Chief Justice. Her court did the usual activist interpretation and saw no basis to deny civil unions called marriages. The Massachusetts Great and General Court (the State legislature) was in support of the homos. If they were to vote on a constitutional amendment, they probably would have passed an amendment to permit homo marriage. Romney simply folded and administer the law that the other two branches of government were telling him to follow. Had Romney pushed back, we could have had homo marriage enshrined in the State Constitution which is much harder to change than a court ruling. At least the door is still open for a voter referendum.

I sense the next President is scheduled to be Romney if so —I doubt there willbe any house cleaning -as I see little difference between Romney and Obama.It seems the situation here in America may have passed the tipping point where the government and the governed are incapable of correcting the errors made.YIKES indeed!

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.