honestly her acting cant be that bad O_o
guys please tell me these critics are out of their minds
she is the actress equivelant of Shamalan ... i dont believe it

The Daily Mail may have fired the first warning shot over the new actress. Baz Bamigboye gave the movie three out of five stars and pleaded: "Come back Megan Fox, all is forgiven." The critic does note the movie is "technically sublime" even if the human supermodel "can't act."

The summer blockbuster "Transformers: Dark of the Moon" brings back the battle between good and evil robots -- this time with a pulsating score, bigger explosions, and 3D action that's coming right at you.

The Daily Mail may have fired the first warning shot over the new actress. Baz Bamigboye gave the movie three out of five stars and pleaded: "Come back Megan Fox, all is forgiven." The critic does note the movie is "technically sublime" even if the human supermodel "can't act." Entertainment Weekly's Lisa Schwarzbaum grades the movie a respectable B, but that may be despite the presence of the actress. The review notes, "In the interchangeable role of sex doll, Victoria's Secret model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley assumes the spot vacated by Megan Fox."

Wesley Morris of the Boston Globe assigns the sci-fi thriller just two out of four stars, and describes the English-born actress as "a replacement for Megan Fox, who is Judi Dench by comparison."
Both women get ripped in Bill Gibron's take for Filmcritic. He rated the movie a four out of five stars and called the third in the series a "crowd pleaser." Still, the review calls out Huntington-Whiteley as "no better or worse than the curt Kewpie Doll she replaced."

Get the picture? Good looking does not mean good acting. Well, you can't have everything.

Though Rosie Huntington-Whiteley's performance did hit one or two rough spots early in the film, for the most part I thought she did an extremely good job(especially when you consider that this was her very first acting gig). She also has an extremely warm and likable onscreen presence and she's a much, much, much better actress than Megan "Plastic Surgery Disaster" Fox.

actually he was hired to be the love interest, kinda like mary jane was.
as for why the hat: why else.

I'm sorry, but when I see Michael Bay movies, especially the Transformers ones, he doesn't hire actresses to be the "Mary Janes" of his films, they're more just sexual objects of the main guy character, just like 80s-90s action films.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golgo-13

She was no better or worse than Megan Fox, which is bad for Megan Fox because she had been acting for a while before being cast in TF1, and this is Rosie's first acting gig....

She had a few rough moments, but let's not kid ourselves here. She was cast as eye candy and she executed that duty perfectly. Her character had almost no personality because they didn't GIVE her a personality (which is typical of love interests in action movies, or in the case of Transformers films, nearly every other human character except Sam).

__________________Bootleg Batman Begins: "Bruce found a basement under his villa, in which the equipments turn him into another person: Spiderman. With this mask, Spiderman stroke all criminal activates and criminals everywhere, such as Tougon, the chief of Mafia, Doctor Jackstraw, the abnormal drug trafficker, even a mysterious opponent familiar with him———”

guys im seeing BAYFORMERS 3 tomorrow ,
so i figured you all would find this article interesting ...
the sad fact is that YAHOO is a crappy place to use as articles and when they hit on something that catches the eyes of the public (sports etc..) its usually an article they stole and added a few extra lines to .

so here goes :

Rosie looks sexy as sin , so ill give her a shot , sure she is in the sex symbol iindustry, but look how many people came out of that (claudia schiffer ,Denise Vasi , Estella Warren , nikki tyler ) sure some of them cant act worth a damn but they are sexy as hell.

personally megan is still sexy , but i take into consideration she is a publicity hound and did the "real" arguement about BAY to stir up interest (its been known to happen) and ill have my opinion on Rosie , unless she turns out to be as usefull as BIEBER in a date with a girl ,

angel , well i wish her the best, like i wished Calisto in X-MEN 3:the final garbage or poor whats her name , the actress who played katara in the ONLY AIRBENDER we are ever getting .

as far as yahoo : ill use this picture and i beleive it says it all
because it doesnt suprise me CRITICS for movies are the most [censored] of all humanity , (they wouldnt know talent if it bit them in the BUTT)

This is crazy! Even in the first scene I thought to myself "WOW. She's way better than Megan Fox." I also think she was more emotional in this movie than Fox TF1+TF2 combined. Also, people are forgetting that Megan Fox had acting experience in prior movies...this is her first movie ever.

she was terrible. nice eye candy but there was 0 chemistry between her and Shia. she was employed to pout and strut. she did that well. but her she had nothing else to offer.
SPOILER.

The final scene where her and Shia do the "gone with the wind" meet up was embarrasing due to the fact that there was nothing of any substance and heart in their relationship. Now most of this is Bays fault, but if she had some charisma on screen and some sort of spark of chemistry with Shia the emotional impact that was intended might've had some merit.

She is being rightfully ripped by critics as this is a film. and they are professional reviewers of film.
Regardless of whether she isnt there to act, just to look good, she is acting and thus is judged accordingly.