Geraldo Rivera said Friday that his sources tell him the U.S. was involved in a secret mission in Libya to arm the Syrian rebels, which was the reason for the initial secrecy about the attack in Benghazi.

Even a blind hen will find a grain now and then. Have any of the whistle blowers mentioned this yet? As far as MSM is concerned FR does/must not exist. Maybe it will take someone like Geraldo to ask this question in public.

18
posted on 05/10/2013 9:34:01 AM PDT
by BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)

What's Rivera's motive here?? Hmmmmm.. Well, it's to provide cover for 0bama. King O needs a reason to have LIED to the American people and Rivera's assertion attempts to justify the lie. 0bama, Hillary, Rice and Carney all lied for national security reasons. B.S.

This does NOT explain why the Commander-In-Chief failed to request clearance to send in fighter jets, or the orders to refrain from saving Americans in distress. And how does NOT immediately saying we suffered a terrorist attack relate to the mission that was going on there? It doesn't. How is 'a YouTube video' cover for sending missiles to Syrian rebels? It isn't.

Nice try but no cigar, Geraldo. Check's in the mail anyway though I suppose.

“Good Grief people!! Quit hating on the messenger if hes messaging some truth. What is the matter with some of you? You only want certain ones to report the truth? In-FReeoing-credible.”

You just don’t seem to get it. If the messenger is flawed enough, the message becomes secondary, and often is lost. It’s Alinsky 101, attack the messenger. So, having Whoraldo try to pimp some “insider information” is more harmful than helpful. Whoraldo is a demonstrable self promoter with only name recognition behind him. He’s not a journalist, he’s not honest, and he’s not a man of good character.

I’d like Whoraldo to enjoy a hot, full mug of STFU.

34
posted on 05/10/2013 9:47:01 AM PDT
by brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)

I think the point folks may be missing here, is that Whorealdo is saying this to give cover. “There was a reason for the cover-up.” Hence, no problem... So the bastard may be up to speed on this point, but he’s still lost in the tulies when it comes to the overall evil perpetrated by this administration and it’s flying monkeys in the killings of our staff in Benghazi.

Dear Geraldo: it seems to me that Qadaffi kept those missiles under lock and key. For some reason, Hillary and Obama thought that they should help overthrow Qadaffi which resulted in all those missiles no longer being secure. Now, the real question is: Why would Hillary and Obama allow all those missiles to be taken out of secure facilities? They are either too stupid to be allowed to be in public, or they are thieves who did it for money. I don’t think they are very bright, but I think they did it for money. Maybe not an immediate payment, but money to be received at a later time.

45
posted on 05/10/2013 9:53:04 AM PDT
by blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.