High School Students Vacated From Ben Shapiro Speech so They Won’t be ‘Offended’

Ben Shapiro, a conservative political pundit and author, gave a speech at a California (yeah, I know) High School and didn’t pull any punches when he gave the students a dose of reality. It didn’t go over well with the leftwing establishment.

On Tuesday afternoon, a bright beautiful day in San Diego, California, I learned a few valuable lessons about America’s teenagers and our public schools.

Few of them were good.

A local chapter of Young America’s Foundation led by high school students at Otay Ranch High School organized a talk for me; I was scheduled to chat with 450 or so students about the political right versus the political left, and the differences between their fundamental values. Prior to the speech, I received a worried call from the school’s assistant principal and Title IX officer, Dean Nafarrete. He told me that after scheduling the talk, several of the teachers had expressed dismay that I was being allowed to speak on campus – after all, they’d been granted a monopoly on bias in the classroom. I told him that I was obviously a conservative and would be speaking as such; I informed him that the teachers should get used to hearing an opposing opinion once per year.

Didja get that? Several members of academic intelligentsia had their panties in a wad over their nihilist ideas being challenged by someone who dispenses with the politically correct bullshit.

The students were eager to listen — they packed the hall. A growing Bernie Sanders movement had apparently sprung up on the campus, and so I decided to focus on the moral and practical foolishness of a philosophy that prizes fairness of outcome over equality of opportunity. Many of the students seemed interested.

Until their personal sacred cows were skewered, that is.

Our public school system has been teaching students that they are each members of victimized groups. That became eminently clear when I discussed the left’s apparent dismissiveness with regard to facts if those facts contradict their “equality uber alles” narrative. As an example, I spoke about the so-called wage gap, and explained that women are not paid less than men for equal work, equal experience, and equal jobs. This was met with not-so-subtle tsking from the young women in the audience – few of whom have ever held a job, let alone received a salary, and yet many of whom apparently believe that American society has placed them behind life’s 8-ball.

But that treasured feeling of victimhood truly came to the fore when I discussed income mobility in the United States. I spent a fair bit of time telling them about the fact that Americans gain wealth over the course of their lives, about the fact that the greatest obstacle to economic mobility is personal bad decisions. Asked by one of the students about why we shouldn’t redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor in order to make the poor rich, I explained, “The reason people are permanently poor in the United States, isn’t because they don’t have money, it’s because they suck with money. The reasons people are temporarily poor can vary.”

At this point, many of the students became agitated; later, Nafarrete would tell me that they had low-income parents, and that their feelings had been hurt. I continued, “That’s not even controversial. If you’re permanently poor [in America] for your entire life, you’re not great with money by definition…”

Which is when Nafarrette intervened and dismissed the students, explaining, “I’m sorry Mr. Shapiro, I’m at a point right now, where, quite frankly, I’m going to dismiss the students…With all due respect, Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Shapiro represents a narrative that he’s providing to all you guys based on his opinions, what he believes, what he wants to share with all of you. I know that the education was there for all of you to understand, the left side, right side, whatnot, but also the opportunity was allowed for him to impress some of his opinions on certain things…I think what this is getting into now, it’s starting to cross a line.”

Cross a line?

Gawd forbid that students are exposed to viewpoints that differ from the leftwing indoctrination that saturates modern curriculum.

I asked him what the line was; he didn’t explain.

“For those students who would like to be dismissed, I’m going to allow you to go ahead and do so at this time,” he said.

As the students left the room, I asked Nafarrete why his dismissal was necessary. He explained that it was his job to “protect” the students. I asked him whether that “protection” extended to protection of feelings, and if so, why it was his job to protect the emotions of students rather than allowing them to hear facts and differing points of view.

No answer was forthcoming.

Feelings had been hurt; action had to be taken.

After the offended cupcakes left, Shapiro continued speaking to those who were mature enough to handle it. He slammed the asinine “microaggression” and “trigger warning” trends that make American education even more of a laughing stock.

Mr. Shapiro, as a student who chose to stay to hear your talk, I’d like to share a few things.

One being that on behalf of the students who were eager and open to hearing your point of view, thank you for taking time out of your schedule to come speak at our school despite how obviously liberal most of your audience was (It is, after all, still a public school). We appreciate your time.

Two being that despite the vocal minority, your talk caused many students (liberal, conservative, and otherwise) to really think about some key issues for themselves, something that is not encouraged often enough. Long after your talk was over, I heard students across campus relaying things you said ranging from the “…they suck with money” comment (which I, at least, got a great kick out of by the way) to your brief annecdote (sic) about your wife taking time off from school for maternity purposes and how the feminist movement doesn’t always support the decisions of females unless they coincide with their agenda (and as a female myself, that was actually one of my favorite parts).

Lastly, on behalf of Mr. Nafarrete, the administrator who allowed students to leave if they so chose, please know that he was just trying to do his job. More so than just protecting feelings, he truly cares about the student body and I believe he wanted to allow students who were “agitated” the option to leave, thus giving those of us who wanted to stay a less (for lack of a better word) “hostile” environment to ask you questions.

Again, thank you very much for speaking, and while there is no excuse for the lack of tolerance displayed by many students and teachers, please know that your talk was not in vain. There are many of us who applaude (sic) you for even attempting to take on a public high school as an openly conservative speaker, and I personally took away a lot from what you had to say.

Hope to hear you again sometime.

From what I gather, attendance was not mandatory, so those who were there chose to do so. Secondly, those leftwingnut teachers aren’t doing those kids any favors. If they can’t engage in political discourse and realize that the world isn’t an easy place, they’re gonna be shit out of luck when they graduate.