CBD Oil Genisis

For decades, cannabis activists and growers were focused on cultivating high-THC strains of cannabis, and struggled to convince the world of its medicinal benefits. The medical cannabis movement continues to tout the therapeutic properties of THC, but is facing a critical sea change as research continues to reveal the immense health benefits of CBD—without a need for the “high” from THC at all.

In fact, there have been more scientific studies on CBD in the last decade than in the years since its discovery. The results of this research have been so promising for so many ailments that it might be non-psychoactive, non-addictive CBD that finally brings cannabis prohibition to an end. As the push for cannabis legalization continues, the demand for access to CBD for research, clinical trials, and drug development will only increase. Hundreds of scientists from pharmaceutical companies—including GW pharma, Merck, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Allergan—are already regularly attending meetings of the International Cannabinoid Research Society.

“Cancer – Step Outside the Box” Review

The Hemp Happy Store On Amazon

Search for CBD Products & Accessories on Amazon

Unlocking Your Health & Fitness Review

>>>Holistic Lifestyle For Unshakeable Health & Fitness!<<<

Australian Poll

USE THE HASHTAG #LEGALISEITAUSTRALIA WHEN POSTING ABOUT CANNABIS ON SOCIAL NETWORKS TO HELP SPREAD THE CAUSE.
It is time to form together as the people of this country and demand this to go forward, if we can spread this petition and get enough signatures we can bring it to the attention of the Australian government after all of these years of trying, let's actually do it!

USA Poll

Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings.

If the Australian Government is truly concerned with the welfare of citizens and their goal is 'to regulate products to benefit the community's health and well being', why won't they look at the thousands of positive results from users. If they truly support the 'desperate search for a cancer cure', why don't they at least take a closer look?