Trump said Congress has 6 months to pass the Dream Act and he will sign it to cement his legacy as a major legislative accomplishment. He said these
800,000 people will be deported if Congress does not pass the Dream Act within 6 months.

I take it from your list of opinion pieces you actually have seen no proof at all then? As I suspected.

Apparently you opted not to read the factual links you requested.

Looks like you put the "willful" in "willful ignorance".

I read the links - they are opinion pieces for the easily led.

Nope...Your posts are opinion. My links included facts.

You don't appear honest to me.

Your links provide no facts that prove Assange is a stooge of the Russians. None at all.
Like I said, opinion pieces for the easily led.

He is on record asking the Ecuadorian government to allow him to replace his embassy security with Russian Security Agents aka FSB.

You might be working for Russians when....

Yeah no...

Embassy security, inside, is handled by the nation whose embassy it is. Security outside the embassy is handled by the host country.

It would be like the Russian embassy in Berlin asking the US CIA to handle security.

It isnt going to happen for many reasons.

But feel free to link us to your source. To be honest it sounds like something Sorcia Faal would print. When you read the info did it start out along
the lines of Top FSB personnel in the Kremlin are reporting / briefing...

originally posted by: aquaM
Trump said Congress has 6 months to pass the Dream Act and he will sign it to cement his legacy as a major legislative accomplishment. He said these
800,000 people will be deported if Congress does not pass the Dream Act within 6 months.

I did not say Assange had Russian FSB providing security...I said he requested it from the Ecuadorians.
He is on record and quoted in an interview. I already provided the link in previous post or you can google it yourself.

Lots of folks seem to be arguing against simple facts around here?

I suppose that is what happens when facts collide with preferred world views.

I did not say Assange had Russian FSB providing security...I said he requested it from the Ecuadorians.
He is on record and quoted in an interview. I already provided the link in previous post or you can google it yourself.

Lots of folks seem to be arguing against simple facts around here?

I suppose that is what happens when facts collide with preferred world views.

The simplest of facts is that you have no proof to back up your claim that Assange is working for the Russians.
You made it up, presumably because you had been reading too much gossip from sources that provided you with the confirmation bias you
needed.

I did not say Assange had Russian FSB providing security...I said he requested it from the Ecuadorians.
He is on record and quoted in an interview. I already provided the link in previous post or you can google it yourself.

Lots of folks seem to be arguing against simple facts around here?

I suppose that is what happens when facts collide with preferred world views.

The simplest of facts is that you have no proof to back up your claim that Assange is working for the Russians.

You seem to be courting a bizarre disconnect in your cognition . Perhaps to stroke your own constructed worldview?

Consequently I am unsure if you are lying to others or yourself or some combination thereof?

you have no proof to back up your claim that Assange is working for the Russians

Assange has LITERALLY been "working for the Russians" since 2012 when he signed a contract with the Russian Government to be paid for his "show" on RT
Media, a Russian State Owned outlet.

I did not say Assange had Russian FSB providing security...I said he requested it from the Ecuadorians.
He is on record and quoted in an interview. I already provided the link in previous post or you can google it yourself.

Lots of folks seem to be arguing against simple facts around here?

I suppose that is what happens when facts collide with preferred world views.

The simplest of facts is that you have no proof to back up your claim that Assange is working for the Russians.
You made it up, presumably because you had been reading too much gossip from sources that provided you with the confirmation bias you
needed.

LEts give up on trying to explain this to him. we already showed his arguments to be opinions only.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.