Women are great, yadda yadda

They outperform boys at school, university, and work. They’re the twentysomething Generation Y women – educated, ambitious, successful. But is life really as good as it looks? Louise Carpenter reports

Indeed, another pile of triumphant nonsense about how women are so brilliant and outperforming men, the sort that regularly crops up from feminists, often lying side-by-side with articles that, paradoxically, bang on about how women are held back by the Patriarchy, under-represented on boards of directors, and glass-ceiling this, wage-gape that, blah-buggering-blah.

Still, to be fair, the writer does acknowledge her study isn’t scientific (well duh, like we couldn’t work that out for herself) and she also points out (but without condemnation) the shocking sense of entitlement of young women.

At the end of each day of interviews with the girls, I’d emerge from my study punch-drunk from their undiluted self-confidence; the absolute cast-iron belief in the power of their own will.

Really? After a day with them, I’d have come out disgusted by the infinite arrogance, stupidity and narcissism shown by these entitlement princesses. I’d have probably punched them too.

Amongst the things that stand out are these:

All of them bore out the theory that girls are easier to educate than boys. Many grew up being told by parents and teachers they were the best, certainly better than boys – which, for some, had caused its own problems.

Indeed, girls are easier to educate. Did I say educate? I mean indoctrinate. They sit still, shut up and do anything to please, and tell them something will empower them – like working in a soul-crushing office job for 45-years – and they’ll often do it. Boys will think for themselves and rebel against things that aren’t in their own interest; unless, of course, they have been successfully emasculated by feminist teachers and therapists and their truck-loads of Ritalin.

There a few hints at how being told telling girls they are so brilliant and everything revolves around them, and that they can do anything, isn’t such a good idea when they grow up.

‘I had to go into cognitive therapy when I got to university,’ one young and ambitious woman who went to one of the top two universities in Britain told me. ‘I’d spent my life being told I was brilliant only to find myself surrounded by women just like me. I started having panic attacks and shaking and being sick.’

Erm…okay. I’m sure it’s quite normal for people to have panic attacks and puke up with deranged horror when they find out that they’re not the centre of the entire Universe after all. Did I say people? I meant women.

None of them wanted to date ‘losers’ – men they defined as lacking in ambition or talent; they never cited low pay as a factor.

Remember; never listen to what women say, watch what they do.

They’ll say money isn’t a factor but, unless it’s casual sleeping-around, they’ll rarely go out with a guy who earns less than they do. They’ll all judge a guy on his finances. I’ve known women go on about how they wish they had a rich husband whose money they could spend, or better yet a rich ex-husband, but in the same conversation furiously deny they would marry (or divorce) for money and that “I’m not like that.” They genuinely believe it too.

They had, on average, a monthly disposable income of between £500 and £1,000. All of them bought something new each month, mostly from Topshop, Zara and Primark with the occasional ‘investment’ buy. The rest was spent in bars, restaurants and in hair salons (a number of them said ‘I don’t spend that much on hair’ only to tell me they had a cut every six weeks, never mind the money spent on highlights). Most of them did some form of exercise and looked after their bodies by eating good food.

No wonder articles like this give such a rosy impression of women. They rely solely on what women tell them!

And most of it is bullshit. They’re arrogant and will lie through their teeth. They’ll say they buy economically, make ‘investment purchases’ (i.e. a pair of £150 shoes “I’ll wear at least twice!”) and eat healthily…when in fact they’ll piss their money up the wall, get into debt and binge drink.

Another admitted that between the age of 17 and 24 she’d had 40 partners – not because she was vulnerable or mistreated, waiting on the end of a phone for them to call back, but because she was in control: ‘You learn,’ she explained. ‘I learnt what I wanted and what I didn’t want. I was trying things out. It was like a sport to me, a bit male, the thrill of the chase.’

40 cocks by 24? Well done you slut. Your parents must be proud they have a daughter with no morals or self-respect, not to mention a vagina like a wizard’s sleeve.

All of them emphasised the importance of safe sex so vehemently that I believed them. A few said they even ‘doubled up’ on the pill and condoms (a practice unheard of when I was in my twenties; we were all more terrified of pregnancy than STDs). For many of these women, Aids testing was seen as a healthy, intelligent precaution rather than something terrifying and last-resort.

Ugh! These women fuck so many guys they have to regularly have AIDs tests? Barf!

Attitudes to drink reflected the same kind of carpe diem spirit. In 2005, 22 per cent of women binge-drank and a fifth of young women broke the government’s recommended alcohol-intake limit. None of my sample group went that far – a good few were extremely moderate – but even for those who admitted to drinking a lot, it was controlled: ‘I never drink so much that I make myself ill or don’t know what I’m doing or who I’m with.’

Of course they’ll claim they drink in moderation. They’re not going to admit to boozing out of their heads and waking up with a strange man are they? Or if that does happen, they can always claim the pitcher of vodka was spiked.

But what exactly were the sacrifices they witnessed at close quarters? For most of the Generation Y-ers, certainly those born to a generation of working mothers, they saw sacrifice as not seeing enough of the children because of the demands of a good career, or not rising to the zenith of that career because of the children. For my generation, however, the Bridget Jones generation if you will, a new crisis is presenting itself – infertility. Thirtysomething women have spent so much time on their careers that growing numbers are finding they have left it too late to have a baby.

Haha! Nothing amuses me more than bolshy career gals and feminists growing old, childless and utterly lonely because they stupidly followed feminism.

So how will it be for Generation Y? Will they march through their thirties conquering the world, only to reach their forties to be faced with infertility and a single life? Or will they have learned from my generation? Who knows. Ask most young women and they do not envisage a life of childlessness.

It’ll be the former case; hitting middle age with no kids, no husband and nothing but a wardrobe full of clothes and a silly job title (probably with ‘consultant’ or ‘communication’ in it or something) to show for their lives. After all, women aren’t very good at learning from their mistakes.

‘I am really surprised when I hear of girls my age getting married and having kids only because I’m nowhere near that stage yet,’ says Camilla Arfwedson, a 25-year-old actress. ‘The strange thing is I know it’s absolutely normal for girls to have children now and it really makes me wonder whether we are being “unnatural” putting off the body clock. I often get broody when I see babies, but then the sensible voice at the back of my head says, “No! Not yet. It’s you and your career now. Chill out.”‘

What a moron. Her natural instincts – those things formed by millions of years of evolution – make her get broody and feel compelled to have children in her 20s, but a voice she laughingly describes as “sensible” – formed from a few decades of brainless feminism, and ranted forth by a bunch of unhinged Marxist lesbians – advises her to put it off, work on her career, and “chill out.” Fine. You chill out love. But don’t whine when your getting all broody in your thirties but your biological clock is rapidly ticking down and a barren and lonely middle-age awaits you.

But one 31-year-old woman, still single and enjoying the 11-year gap without concern for the future, told me this: ‘I know of two women, both my age, who have just had babies they sort of regret. Both gave the same reason: after reading Daily Mail-style scare stories, they were convinced that, even at 30 they were leaving it too late and now wish they’d waited until they were 36. Personally, I don’t have the fear yet, mainly because my own mother was 38 when she had me.’

So these women had babies “they regret”? Well, fucking charming.

How will these kids feel growing up and sensing their mother regretted having them because it impeded mummy’s slutting around and playing career gal.

‘I want loads,’ said 31-year-old Sarah Sutton, a board director and a young woman who, as it happens, can fly a plane, sail a boat and has two degrees. ‘But I haven’t quite added up how I’m going to do it. I don’t want to resent the time I take out and I don’t want to spend six years at home having children. I might become depressed. Maybe I could get a multiple birth and have them all at once? Or maybe I could have a couple and adopt the rest? I want a very relaxed lifestyle, too, maybe have my own business.’

How greedy. How selfish. “I want it all!!” She even wants to have her own business but wants a “very relaxed life style.” Erm…I doubt if her business would last very long if it’s run by someone who wants to relax. Daft cunt.

Someone should have the sense to inject a bit of reality into this woman’s thinking and tell her “You’re 31 my dear, if you wanted six-kids you should have started a good six-years or so ago. And you can fly a plane, sail a boat and have two degrees? WOW! That’s fantastic…shame the main thing guys look for in a wife is youth and a willingness to have children and look after them. You have none of these things. Get a cat and go and join the ranks of spinsters.”

Emily Murray, a writer on Condé Nast Brides magazine, is planning to have her babies at the age of 32. She planned to get married at 28, which she has just done and, in fact, she picked her Cambridge college because of the ratio of men to women and because she wanted to find her husband there, which, in a roundabout way, she did: ‘Not bad, huh,’ she says. ‘I find that, with a bit of good luck, things usually work out. I feel I will stay at home with my child for as long as I can bear it, but definitely not more than a year.’

This bitch should be sterilized. Seriously. She wants a baby but can’t be arsed looking after one, and talks of being “home with my child for as long as I can bear it.” That’s her future baby she’s talking about, but she goes on about not bearing to be with it, like it’s disgusting to have to be with her own child. She shouldn’t have any then, she’ll make a terrible mother.

Most men traditionally can’t bear to be in work all the time but did so for the sake of their wives and children to support them. Now we still have to do that shit (even for ex-wives and kids we can’t see) but it’s fine for women to get someone else to look after their children.

She no doubt only wants to become a mother because, in the Matriarchy, mothers are worshiped above all. Oh, and note that she went to Cambridge solely to find a husband there, and no doubt because any guy going there would be more likely to end up in a lucrative career? They still refuse to marry down these women. Heaven forbid they have to support a man (even though, when we supported them, that was ‘oppression’.)

‘I do think it must suck to be a guy in this day and age,’ says one successful public-relations consultant. ‘Masculinity is such a complex role to carry off nowadays and I think that’s in part influenced by the fact that women are so demanding. At the turn of the millennium there were all these songs by groups like Destiny’s Child and Missy Elliott about how women no longer need a man to pay their bills, to look after them or fulfill any of those traditional roles. I think there has definitely been a change in the zeitgeist and I think women do have the upper hand, in a sense.’

Well, fair play to this woman, at least she admits women are so demanding.

‘I’m one of three sisters,’ 24-year-old Laura Brunt told me. ‘We are all in our twenties and had an idyllic childhood, are certainly not unattractive and are even capable of being quite decent company – and yet it’s a running joke among our friends that we never seem to have a boyfriend, that we’re too picky or intimidating. My friends are always moaning about the lack of decent available men out there but I always seem to be looking for the next Mr Unobtainable and Mr Arrogant, and I admit I enjoy the games, the conquering of the bad guy and moving on. I also know how cold it is making me and how hard I make it for men to get close to me.’

So let me get this straight. She has hopelessly high standards, she sluts around, she gets fucked by one thug after another, she realises she’s started to act cold towards men. And she’s wondering why her and her sisters (who are probably just as fucking whorish as her) never seem to have boyfriends? I like the way this woman – whose surname rhymes with ‘cunt’, which is all she is, it seems; a walking cunt for thugs to dump their cum into – declares she’s not unattractive and capable of being quite decent company. Really? Is that why you never seem to have boyfriends? Amazing how highly women tend to rate themselves. She’s probably ugly, and from reading her rambling, she’s probably as loathsome to be around as she is loathsome to listen to.

This was not an uncommon experience. ‘Mediocre’ men were simply not on the agenda as long-term partners, and knowing they were outstripping their male counterparts, many of the Generation Y-ers admitted to being increasingly attracted to older men, who are perceived as having more to offer. ‘Older men are very inspiring,’ comments Camilla Arfwedson. ‘They are great for providing support and good advice.’

That’s because you’ll find you and your fucking feminist movement emasculated many younger men and turned many into manginas and stripped the others of any real concern for you women and your fucking Matriarchy and replaced with a good dose of nihilism.

Besides, if these women are so great, why do they need support and advice? You don’t see us men seeking such things in partners. Us supposedly inferior men can take care of ourselves and make our own decisions.

It’s hilarious listening to women who have fucked 40 guys before their mid-20s and who don’t want children until they’re past it saying they don’t want ‘mediocre’ guys. This bitches are below mediocre. They’re the bottom of the barrel.

‘I sometimes wonder if men are more comfortable going out with women who are a bit less clever than they are,’ muses Sarah Scougal, 26, who works for Working Title films. ‘I suppose boys do prefer to assert their sense of superiority.’

Yeah, well, maybe we do like to assert our superiority but let’s face it, a guy who is less intelligent, less successful and less confident than a woman – or who acts it at least – is going to get dumped pretty quick. Most guys don’t care about whether a woman is clever or not, it’s whether she’s an arrogant fuck or not that we’re concerned with. Furthermore, she mistakes being clever with being educated; I know plenty of women who – unlike me – have degrees, but who are often staggeringly thick, lacking in general knowledge and indeed oblivious to most current affairs (unless it is to do with what’s happening in the soaps, the latest about some worthless celebrities or which clothes store in town is having a sale.)

‘Women are becoming more like the old-style men,’ Professor Wolf said, ‘men who felt failures if they weren’t made CEOs, or admirals. Historically, one of the plus sides of being a woman was that there was a reputable alternative and, if society values bringing up a family well, being a good mother, creating a home to which everybody enjoys returning – and let’s be honest, that includes the man you love – then surely that’s a worthwhile choice to make for your life?’

Haha! Lap it up ladies. You wanted to enter a man’s world and try and act like us, now you can. That means working long and hard to climb a career ladder at a job you’ll grow to hate. Enjoy!

Laura Brunt agrees that, while the possibilities are endless, so too are the pressures. ‘We’re expected to have an impressive full-time job, a decent relationship, a mixed group of loyal friends, a house (which is tidy), the right clothes (and be thin enough to wear them) but still be able to eat in all the right restaurants. I may not be doing all this just yet but it certainly feels like this is the path I need to follow over the next few years.’

…

Sarah Scougal again: ‘I find it profoundly confusing. I went to St Paul’s Girls School and to Oxford and I feel I need to do well as a woman, and yet there is this reality-celebrity phenomenon where people get rich quickly, which is sending out a strange, totally opposite message. So on the one hand you have this post-feminist message about achievement and on the other, there’s the message that the quickest, most secure route to wealth is going on Big Brother and having your boobs done.’ She pauses and sounds perplexed. ‘Maybe that’s just yet another aspirational drive of my generation.’

What the fuck are these women on about? They’re confused because they receive conflicting messages about what they should aim for in life? Try thinking for yourselves you fucking sheep.

Talking to my group, I am sure about one thing though. The future is bright and it is female. Maybe it is the poor, confused young men we should be worried about. As a friend said: ‘You’re OK, you’ve got girls, but as a mother of a boy, I’m just a bit worried.’

Don’t you worry about your son. He’ll be okay probably. He’s male, and one of the many talents us males have is learning to adapt.

We’ve adapted to a feminist society after all. We increasingly avoid marriage, we’ll avoid co-habitation now that that is becoming like marriage in a legal sense. Many guys fuck ‘n chuck women. Others move abroad. We indulge in our hobbies rather than become wage slaves to an ungrateful wife who is like no wife at all, merely a financial black-hole who only marries once she’s whored around and given her best years to a long line of dipshit thugs. We decide women have priced themselves out of the market so we indulge in hobbies, be it fishing, video games, riding motorbikes or mocking stupid articles like this one.

And they can shove this talk of men being ‘confused’ up their arses too. We always get that. “Men are confused, they don’t know their role in society, blah blah.”

Bollocks, young men are not confused. Young men know their role in society; work, work and work. Pay taxes to fund the Matriarchy and it’s army of single mothers, and establish a career to fund the early retirement of some woman once she’s used up, skanked out and looking to retire at 30. Women can disregard their old gender role of being a good wife and mother and running a home, but us men can’t disregard ours. For example, women who don’t want to look after their children can dump them in daycare, and indeed are encouraged to do so, but men cannot get out of Child Support; it’s sexist for a woman to be expected to look after her child but it’s fine to force a man to support the child.

Magic numbers: women’s rise in figures

154.5 births per 1,000 women was the birth rate in 1971. By 2002, it had fallen to 84.75 per 1,000 women. Fertility levels in women have almost halved since 1971.

Congratulations modern women, you’re sending our society down the drain. Not to mention ensuring that in Europe we’ll be outnumbered by Muslims in a few generations. Then we’ll see how women cope under Sharia law. Hahaha.

20% of young women break the government’s alcohol limits.

This personifies the whole stupidity of this article, the way feminists take pride in women doing anything, even dumb shit like binge-drinking. If men drink a lot they’re all filthy drunks but if women do, it’s “Grrrl power, woooh! Yeah, you go girl, who needs working livers anyway?”

25% of women under 25 have had more than one partner in the last year.

So a lot of women are sluts, so what? Maybe it just means they’re getting fucked and chucked more often. Who knows. Who cares? It’s not like it’s an achievement, most women under 25 – even if rather unattractive – can find a guy who’ll fuck them.

3x- likelihood of British men to commit suicide, as compared with women.

“Yeah, you go girls! WOOOOH! Stupid men and boys are killing themselves more than we do, yay!”

That, essentially is what she is saying. More men commit suicide, and women cheer. If there was a rise in female suicide, then there are shrieks of oppression and demands for Something To Be Done.

40% of men in their 20s still live at home, compared to 24% of women of the same age.

So? Nothing wrong with a guy living at home if his parents are cool about it. Saves having a shockingly massive mortgage.

Besides, as cannot be stated enough times, woman have the option of getting knocked up and being given a house from the council, and a vast number do so. Men have to actually work and pay for a house themselves, or be homeless, or live with parents.

96% of female graduates were employed in 2005.

Employed how though? I know a young woman with a law degree who has been working as a barmaid for more than three-years as she tries in vain to get a training contract to be a solicitor.

40% of professional jobs in UK are held by women.

Well, companies are require to employ a certain quota of women, usually at least 40%. But hey ladies, ignore that positive discrimination nonsense, put it down to your own abilities.

The basic theme of this article is that women are rising, that they are doing great and are fantastic, etc etc.

Yet all I can tell, from both the stats and the women the author spoke to, is that many young women are:

(a) binge-drinkers
(b) sluts
(c) putting off having kids until it is probably too late
(d) unable to stand the thought of looking after their own children
(e) mindless consumers

And this is meant to be the “rise” of women? More like they’re going in the other direction, down, just like our society and its population thanks to their poxy “liberation” movement.

Or maybe, being a man, I just lack the emotional intelligence women have to see that a society whereby the women are increasingly drunken arrogant slappers with no restraint, morality or grasp of reality is somehow A Good Thing.

Incidentally, there ought to be an article about how us men are doing by adapting the Matriarchy by unplugging and going our own way. Ironically you could use the same statistics as some of those quoted above.

This article claims women are brilliant because they increasingly make up the majority or graduates and are beginning to dominate the workplace. I’d say the same stats imply guys are deciding to do away with University, which increasingly give out useless degrees and land you in massive debt, and quit the rat-race and let women grind themselves into an early grave in soul-crushing jobs.

Plus this is the second article in a couple of weeks I’ve seen whereby a woman has essentially celebrated men and boy’s increasing suicide rate. I think that statistic is not only telling in itself, but the fact that feminists seem to think it’s great shows that, just in case there was any doubt, feminism is a pure fucking hate movement.

Now the jobless get manicures, massages and facials…all thanks to the taxpayer
By NIGEL GREEN – More by this author » Last updated at 21:37pm on 10th March 2007

Of course “jobless” is the PC Euphemism for Single Mother on Welfare.

——————————————————-

At 9:47 PM, k-dog said…

From Duncan’s comments:

“40 cocks by 24? Well done you slut. Your parents must be proud they have a daughter with no morals or self-respect, not to mention a vagina like a wizard’s sleeve.“

Another great insult from this site! ROTFLMAO!

(American readers: If you don’t get this right off, think about the clothing the wizard in the comic strip “Wizard of Id” wears.)

——————————————————-

At 9:57 PM, mfsob said…

Well, this proves it … society as we know it is fucked. The men won’t care enough to fix it and the women are too stupid to realize they’re running full tilt into a brick wall.

——————————————————-

At 10:05 PM, Anonymous said…

Sounds like the powers that be are hell-bent to get women into the managerial and administrative professional positions that run day-to-day operations in society. The education trends (women vs. men) lends some support to this thesis.

Makes sense from a Police State perspective. Women are the ideal pawns. Biologically they are empty vessels waiting to be filled, figuratively and literally. Women will do what they are told when it comes from an authority. That authority used be the church and their husband. Now the authority is television, celebrities, and government officials.

Apparently the model under construction is money/power-brokers at the top pulling all the strings via top down control (i.e., extremely rich and powerful corporate heads and bankers controlling corporate media channels and governments they own). Women the loyal drone servants below them ready to sell their soul for a Prada handbag or some other shiny trinket — heck women will even murder their own children on demand. Men at the bottom being shitted on by everyone above.

What to do? What to do??

Well… one simple solution is to destroy the propaganda infrastructure and watch their control system fall apart. For example, get rid of televisions if have a woman in the house, wreck satellite dishes (knock off alignment), cut cable TV lines. Without a master telling Drone Women what to think and do they will be helpless. Biologically unable to think rationally for themselves (God’s design) they will be forced to turn to men.

WRECK THE MATRIX

——————————————————-

At 10:37 PM, phoenix said…

I know we’re not much better over here in the States but, geez, you guys have really fucked up over there. Britain sounds like an absolutely terrible place to live these days. Sad, it was once a great country. Don’t worry though, we are following you to the depths of hell ourselves. I’m planning on allying with the Muslims myself.

——————————————————-

At 10:45 PM, ColdHammer said…

This is for

CHRISTOPHER FROM OREGON

Since you don’t have a blog and this is the only place I know you lurk around (heh heh), have a question for ya…

Excellent comment. Would that more men had the backbone to reject these appalling scrubbers even for the purpose of casual sex, but then, to paraphrase Maddox, there’ll always be someone as horny as they are inadequate.

I was at Cambridge myself, I recognise the type only too well. I can’t believe they have the neck to claim men are ‘threatened’ by a woman cleverer than they are. Because as you say, the real problem is almost always that they are insufferably arrogant harridans. That and most men of this generation look and act like they’ve fallen out of a nest but then what is there to fight for?

——————————————————-

At 11:34 PM, Blind Fury said…

enjoyed your stuff – thought you might get a kick out of my blog, me being currently divorcing my second wife…

>> Many grew up being told by parents and teachers they were the best, certainly better than boys – which, for some, had caused its own problems.

Yeah, like what happens to them when they discover they aren’t better than boys. That has to be one heckuva shock!

>>’I’d spent my life being told I was brilliant only to find myself surrounded by women just like me. I started having panic attacks and shaking and being sick.’

Well, that sure makes sense to me. If I were surrounded by women like her, I’d sure be suffering from panic attacks and shaking and being sick! And, wondering just how far it is to the border…

>> Most of them did some form of exercise and looked after their bodies by eating good food.

We have seen the videos. Their main exercise is reaching for the food on the table, and they do indeed eat L-O-T-S of good food. I don’t know why they would look after their bodies; they are plenty visible many km. away.

>>Another admitted that between the age of 17 and 24 she’d had 40 partners – not because she was vulnerable or mistreated, waiting on the end of a phone for them to call back, but because she was in control:

Sure sounds out of control to me. I am old enough to remember when it was considered dangerous to consort with prostitutes because their sexual activities made their clients at risk for STD. What a change…

>>not to mention a vagina like a wizard’s sleeve.

I assume that means you can stuff several rabbits and pigeons, and maybe both halves of the woman you saw in half if you mess up and need to hide the evidence, in there with plenty of room to spare. Priceless, man! I gotta’ remember that one.

>>Ask most young women and they do not envisage a life of childlessness.

That’s because most young women these day are insane and stupid, much like the older women.

>> Personally, I don’t have the fear yet, mainly because my own mother was 38 when she had me.’

Gosh, sure sounds to me like reason to panic.That is a terrible birth defect!!!

>>capable of being quite decent company –

That means their cats like them. Or, perhaps that their cats don’t know how to escape.

>>that we’re too picky or intimidating.

Note the direct contradiction. Decent company is NOT picky and intimidating.

>>”Men are confused, they don’t know their role in society, blah blah.”

I wrote an op-ed to the local newspaper back in the States, fifteen or twenty years ago. I compared insane, contradictory feminist demands to something that happened to me in US Army Basic Training in 1964. One day, we were going to march out to the field for training. The sergeant told us to put our rubber overshoes on our ammo belts, that is, carry them on our backs. We frantically started tying them on our belts.

The first man out the door was told by another sergeant that we were to wear them. He ran back in and told us the new rule. We frantically started untying them. The first guy done, and who had them on his feet, went running out the door and was told by the first sergeant we were to put them on our ammo belts.

He ran back in and told us the latest order. We frantically started tying them on the belts again.

The first guy done, ran out the door, and was told by the second sergeant to wear them. He ran back in and told us the latest change.

It was a horrid, sweating, swearing mess!

I basically broke down. I fell on the floor, laughing so hard my stomach hurt. I couldn’t have made it out the door if they threatened to shoot me. I appointed myself barracks orderly for the day and stayed in the barracks.

That is exactly what feminist demands are like, and that is exactly what men should do when women make demands — fall on the floor, holding your stomach and laughing your arse off.

Anonymous age 64

——————————————————-

At 11:36 PM, Blind Fury said…

great blog. You might enjoy mine, since I write from the perspective of a twice divorced guy

How many fuckin men out there have 40 partners in 7 years, let alone their entire life?

I actually have no such male friends at all. I actually don’t even have any acquaintances like that.

I however do know of plenty of women that have WAY MORE partners than men.

Sure there are some men with alot of partners, you need some thugs to fuck all the 90% of whores out there.

10% of the men sleep with 90% of the women.

Women are such dumb whores it makes me sick to my stomach.

What is male about that? Male they say spreading their legs?

When such a low percentage of men do that, i wouldn’t exactly call it male, no it’s what the thugs do.

——————————————————-

At 2:10 AM, Anonymous said…

This is a bit off topic, but it looks like Heather Mills is going to be living good with the $56 million dollar settlement she will be getting in her divorce from Paul McCartney.

——————————————————-

At 2:10 AM, ChicagoMan said…

Also women don’t get it either, life I am saying.

Men aren’t out there to try and compete with you, we don’t give a rats ass.

We want a partner, not a competitor.

if you think that turns us men on, then you have your heads up your asses

——————————————————-

At 2:21 AM, Anonymous said…

I can tell you this much that 40 partners between 17 and 24 is pretty much well true in the US. While I was in the local college here I got to see how tarts act. Take this for instance. I chatted with this one female and was friends with her for a bit. She had a daughter already but I was stupid and lonely at the time so I didn’t care much. She unfortunately only saw me as someone to talk to and wasn’t interested in me beyond that. Well, a few months rolled by and she was gone. I figured she dropped out and left the area. Well, two semesters later but the same girl shows up this time she’s got child #2. Now this was in late 2000 early 2001. Roll the clock ahead to Feb 2007 and I saw she has a profile up online. Title “Tried of Games” and she’s a single mother and works full time. She doesn’t have time for dating “games” that happen now. She’s not looking to get married right away, but should like to meet someone… Well. She f**ked every badboy she could. Got knocked up at least twice to my knowledge and is now looking to get a sucker to marry her. Screw her and that. Let her rot as being a single mother. Did I mention her looks have gone WAAAAY south too? Obviously, the badboys are now ignoring this little sperm repository. Tough s**t for her.

——————————————————-

At 3:01 AM, Anonymous said…

“Magic numbers: women’s rise in figures

154.5 births per 1,000 women was the birth rate in 1971. By 2002, it had fallen to 84.75 per 1,000 women. Fertility levels in women have almost halved since 1971.”

What fucking backwardspeak is this?

——————————————————-

At 4:14 AM, Anonymous said…

Duncan,

The slut-to-saint poster girl.

Used up by the bad boys, but still managed to snag herself a billionaire.

Sends a ridiculous message to younger females, of course. Rich guys are not going to marry a dried up 40 year old woman down to her last egg. Unless she is a major celebrity or brings some other asset to the table he can use (e.g., movie star to sell his rags). Rich guys generally go for (and get) much younger (i.e., fertile) females. I think Salma is going to need more hormone therapy than the Chicago stockyards to push a baby out.

Please note the comment “She’s spent years with the wrong guys, but she finally found someone that treats her really well.”

Actress Salma Hayek isn’t wasting any time introducing the world to the father of her unborn child, French businessman, Francois-Henri Pinault. The couple, who shocked many last week with the announcement that they were engaged and had a baby on the way, made a showing when they stepped out for dinner together at Valentino’s in Santa Monica on Saturday, March 10th.

“Salma and Francios haven’t even been dating a year. They were friends for awhile.” Says a source close to the actress and Ugly Betty producer. “The truth is that Salma is 40 years old and really wanted a baby. She’s gotten to the point where she really wanted a baby. Francios treats her amazingly and she knew he would be a good father. Most of her friends barely know him! They’re just really happy for her because this is what she’s wanted. She’s spent years with the wrong guys, but she finally found someone that treats her really well.”

Admittedly Pinault is no Ed Norton, but as the CEO of PPR, the world’s third largest luxury conglomerate (which owns Gucci and Yves Saint Laurent) we’re assuming the 40-year-old’s maternity wardrobe is gonna be pretty sick.

——————————————————-

At 5:24 AM, Anonymous said…

You make very good points, but there is one that I’d like to comment on.

“Most men traditionally can’t bear to be in work all the time but did so for the sake of their wives and children to support them. Now we still have to do that shit (even for ex-wives and kids we can’t see) but it’s fine for women to get someone else to look after their children.”

I’m not sure how it is where you live, but at least where I grew up both parents had to work in order to make ends meet. Of course it’s screwed up when a woman gets childcare so she can go shopping, it’s another story when she goes back to work to buy the groceries.

——————————————————-

At 6:43 AM, Anonymous said…

“Your parents must be proud they have a daughter with no morals or self-respect, not to mention a vagina like a wizard’s sleeve.”

An exquisite sentence. Duncan, you should start writing a column in a men’s magazine.

——————————————————-

At 10:06 AM, ntk said…

40% of men in their 20s still live at home, compared to 24% of women of the same age.

LOL! Note how they don’t mention why women are more likely to move out.

(For those who can’t figure it out: women move out of home so their parents don’t know who (and indeed, how many men) they’re fucking).

——————————————————-

At 11:10 AM, unpleasant bitter git said…

Great observations Duncan but you left out quoting the part that really jumped out to me:

“According to the Henley Centre, these women are part of a wider trend, classed as Generation Y, a new wave of twentysomethings who believe that the quality of life in Britain is best improved by putting yourself first.”

And that results in the falling birthrate we have in the west.

Which results in the looming ‘pension/skills/growth crisis’ with an aging population that will need a younger generation of at least the same size to support it as well as us being able to compete economically with emerging super powers like China and India.

Which results in both the UK and USA governments (or at least the super rich elite who really pull the strings) applying a ‘stealth policy’ of encouraging illegal immigrants to flood in by leaving the borders open and offering welfare benefits to all. But if you look at it from the point of view of those who control things, how could they honestly introduce mass immigration as a publicly declared policy? Would the general population go along with it if they knew what was really happening? Possibly not.

It’s amazing how everything is connected in some way.

——————————————————-

At 11:21 AM, foster said…

Don’t forget that all of this self-worship is for others to see and read. These women don’t believe what they are saying. It’s all for appearances. They WANT to appear that they love their lives.

Throughout history it has been an understood fact that if girls don’t marry young and devote themselves to one man, they turn into silly old whores who are incapable of love.

Women are emotionally starving to death, but their ideas about love and relationships cause them all their pain.

I don’t understand how they cannot see it.

“Gee, my mother and grandmother were so traditional, and they seem happy. I’ve fucked and sucked every loser around and I’m unhappy. My way is better, how come I’m not happy?!?!”

——————————————————-

At 12:17 PM, Lisa said…

Great write-up. I really wish some feminists would show up and try to justify this garbage.

Class as usual Duncan. I swear I’ve seen an almost identical article spewed out by the media a month or so back.

Talk about denial! Women’s standards are falling through the floor and instead of dealing with it, they try and act like it’s a good thing.

Typical. Hey, check my latest post by the way, on Women’s Prisons. You’re not going to fucking believe what these fuckers are advocating next.

——————————————————-

At 4:21 PM, Anonymous said…

It’s always interesting to watch the women as they get older. They are very hard and unable to trust. They think they had great sex and freedom, but they don’t understand why they feel so cold and betrayed.

The natural sweetness women have when they are good girls is all gone away. I’ve had older girlfriends and even during sex, that apprehension, that hardness is there. It is almost as though their hearts are corrupted and they cannot love.

Sex is only a part of a strong loving relationship. Most of these trashy women will never know it.

I married young to a very traditional girl – though she changed over time and now we are divorced. But from the time I was 19 until I was 35 I knew what it was like for a very loving woman to give herself to me completely. Both men and women get so much more out of sex and relationships by doing things the traditional way.

Now that I’m dating ordinary women who have been around, it is truly sad how beat up they are – physically, emotionally and spiritually. It is beyond tragic.

——————————————————-

At 5:01 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Truly outstanding commentary. Take heart boys, and don’t be disillusioned. By age 22, 60% of women have HPV, and by age 24, at least 50% have genital herpes. One fourth of women in their twenties already have displacia (pre-cancer) from HPV. The best revenge is to sit back and let nature take its course. Women WILL pay for their rebellion. I can tell you from recent experience, there is nothing more satisfying than telling a woman that you won’t pursue a relationship with her because you are STD-free, and fear being infected. I’ve done this twice in recent months, and the sense of empowerment is…..awesome. The look on a woman’s face is…..priceless.

For those of you in your twenties, be patient. Your sex drive will cool by thirty, and women’s looks will hit the gutter at the same time. This is when you will have your vengeance. Trust me on this.

Women are nothing but trouble. I was out late last night, and rode my scooter up the driveway at one-thirty in the morning, ready for bed. My neighbor’s wife was out with her dog that had just crapped on her new hardwood floors, and she wanted to talk. At 1:30 a.m. So, I stood there listening to her complain about her mother. Her painter. Her LIFE.

Nothing but bloody trouble.

Christ.

Coldhammer;

I spend a bit of time over on Outcast Superstar, where some of my views have been posted.

If you’re looking for a starter bike, and are limited to $1000, then your options are limited. Even the smallest new Japanese street bikes are in the $3500-4000 range. If you buy used, try and avoid most bikes from the eighties and even early nineties. Parts availability is a nightmare, as Japanese bikes are truly not built with the intention of lasting, and the manufacturers are not required by U.S. law to continue producing any spare parts after production stops. Be especially wary of Yamaha in this area.

I’ll throw an idea your way if you are looking to learn the basics of riding. Learn on a scooter. Last year, I just wanted to ride a scooter. I’d never had one, so I bought a Kymco People 250. The damn thing is more fun than either of my two Harley’s, and I plan on taking it over the mountains into the deserts of eastern Oregon this spring. It’s big, water-cooled, very fast, cruises comfortably on the freeway at 65 (will do 80) and gets 70 mpg. New, they go for $4500, but used for about $2000 less. Kymco makes a full range of smaller and larger scooters, and you can always buy used for less.

Don’t be embarrassed riding a scooter. We have several massive Harley dealerships in my city, and I love donning my expensive leathers on a sunny Saturday, and riding out to them. I park right in the middle of the assembled Harleys like I own the place, and with my head held high, stomp right through the assembled weekend warriors.

This is manhood.

A true Harley rider, indeed, a true motorcyclist of any kind, is not a fair-weather rider, and couldn’t care less what anyone thinks of his ride. In Oregon, we almost never get snow in the cities, but we get a lot of rain. I don’t keep my bikes stored for the winter. I ride. You’ll find me cruising remote highways in the cold and rain when most people won’t go out in their cars.

No matter.

I’m a MAN, and a biker, and I go my own way. Don’t look back in twenty years and ponder the things you could have done.

Do them.

If at all possible, stretch your budget to accommodate a better bike. My recommendation would be the basic Harley Sportster 883. Due to the shift in the economy, you can buy them new (msrp) for about $6500 at most dealers. Don’t pay more, and don’t let the greedy asshole salesmen try and talk you out of it and into a bigger Harley. The 883 is bulletproof, and is one of the best deals out there, and you can upgrade the motor to 1200cc’s or more fairly inexpensively later if you desire more power. Plus, you’ll be on a Harley, and I can think of no more profound statement that you are a bachelor, and you are spending your money on yourself.

Don’t wait. Every day you waste is gone for ever.

——————————————————-

At 5:12 PM, byrdeye said…

I know we’re not much better over here in the States but, geez, you guys have really fucked up over there. Britain sounds like an absolutely terrible place to live these days.

Yes, I’m really perplexed and amazed at how somehow Britain surpassed the US here as the 10th level of feminist hell, since 2nd-wave feminism started here. Don’t get me wrong – we’re still in a strong 2nd…but damn. WTH happened, fellas?

Anyhow, these power-tripping girls who think they’re all that – what a f’n joke! Only thing they’re excelling in is quotas, government programs, overpaid non-primary support roles, whoring and fluffy liberal farts degrees.

I love how even diehard feminists admit how great they have it now…and yet still find the ability to turn an article on that into one giant whingefest.

The more you give to women, the more they want.
The more you take away, the more grateful they are for what they had.

WE MUST TAKE IT ALL AWAY TO MAKE WOMEN HAPPY, LADS!!!!

Women canNOT appreciate what they have! EVER.

——————————————————-

At 9:04 PM, Anonymous said…

The way things are going, one thing is a virtual certainty: starting in the near future, they will not have it this good again for a very, very long time. Quite the contrary, perhaps.

——————————————————-

At 9:36 PM, CLovIS said…

This type of article is simply the regurgitation of numerous ones before it. Anyone like me who grew up in the late 90s/00s knows what Im on about. Reading newspapers and watching the TV is akin to absorbing a watered down scum manifesto every day. If you are male, the media gleefully tells you are socially redundant, and you can be ridiculed and belittled all day long whilst you are told to justify your existence. You can be called genetically inferior and told that your future role as a father is no longer required – but you must still hang your head in shame and recognise the multitude of ways in which you oppress women.

——————————————————-

At 9:45 PM, arnold ziffel said…

The linked article sounded like more “whistling past the graveyard” to me. As another poster pointed out, articles like this are published on a regular basis. There is a reason, and I think Foster nailed it in the first paragraph of his post.

——————————————————-

At 10:03 PM, ColdHammer said…

Thanks for the motorbike advice, Christopher from Oregon.

What I was really planning to do was get that starter bike and ride it for awhile (probably until it breaks down completely) just to get the riding experience down. But my ultimate goal was to get a dirt bike later on.

One of my dreams was to dirt bike Baja California or the eastern coast of Africa for 2-3k miles in one week or less. And I know that’s really tiring but an adventure!

I guess that’s why I’ve been working out a lot in my life, I’m getting ready for the “ride of my life” literally!

HAHA!

Bye-bye women!

——————————————————-

At 10:18 PM, Anonymous said…

My Married Daughter who has three boys of her own. Told me when she was 24 a former Friend of hers. Who she went to High School with, had by the age of 24 had intercourse with over 120 Men!! Yikes I told her, did she not realize the risk to her health?

It seems that this is not uncommon today with many of our over sexualized Younger American Women. What Man would want to marry such a Tramp? Surely not a Man with any self respect.

Khankrumthebulgar

——————————————————-

At 10:38 PM, Paul Parmenter said…

I read this article through, even though it was clear after a few lines that it was just another rambling “aren’t we empowered women wonderful…aren’t we?” piece of drivel. I forced myself to get through to the end, just in case it was going to say something new or interesting.

It didn’t.

In fact I am not sure it led anywhere or said anything, other than to tell us that there is a breed of modern women who are charging madly into the rat-race at just the time when sensible people are getting out of it, and who think they are conquering the world when in fact they are just enslaving themselves to consumerism and mammon.

We have heard it all before, but it made me reflect yet again on just what these women think they are doing and where they are going. They are all frantically embarked on a life of total, selfish materialism. There is their much-vaunted education (female-style of course) which has obviously taught them nothing of any real value, just loaded them with degrees which qualify them only for the plethora of pseudo-jobs specially created for them. Most of the “careers” mentioned are froth; well paid and highly prestigious in their own eyes, no doubt, but still in essence froth. Nothing constructive, creative or in any way essential. Everything these women have done, are doing or will ever do, could be expunged from history and nobody (except themselves) would be in the slightest bit poorer. They all have what they call careers; but none of them have a vocation.

The only useful talent I noted was the woman who could fly a plane. But did she do it as a career? No, it was obviously just a hobby. She had probably taken flying lessons as something else to do to build up her image, or maybe to meet male flying instructors, or just to while away the hours of boredom. But not for any useful purpose such as actually flying other people around.

Then the women themselves. I was again struck by how shallow and cold they all sounded. Calculating, soulless, heartless, empty. Whirling round and round on their career carousels, piling up money with no idea of what to do with it except squander it on booze, clothes, hair, shoes and handbags. Desperate to create ever-improving images of themselves but without ever being satisfied with the one they see looking back at them from their mirrors.

And the selfishness was beyond all reason. Nowhere was there even the remotest hint that these women would expend their energies, supposed talents or wealth on anyone or anything except themselves. Where was there any one whose ambition was to alleviate poverty? Or to find a cure for cancer? Or to solve any of the world’s problems? Not even a modest altruism anywhere to be seen.

I was left with a picture of a horde of pampered, self-indulgent lemmings. Or immaculately coiffured sheep.

And the astonishing thing was that I was being invited to stand back and admire what I was looking at. And to believe that these hollow, biological dead-ends were in some way superior beings, even the future of the human race.

Don’t make me laugh. Or puke.

If that is the best that the supposedly best women in our society can offer, then I am mighty glad to be a man and going my own way. They can keep it all.

——————————————————-

At 10:51 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

Where was there any one whose ambition was to alleviate poverty? Or to find a cure for cancer? Or to solve any of the world’s problems?

They did not even have any more down to earth ambitions.

When talking about marriage, did any of them talk about being a good wife, or making a man happy? When talking about having babies, did they talk of wanting to be a good mother? Or raising a good child?

No, instead it was all about them. They want a husband to bail them out after years of skankhood, and children to give them the ego-boost of being a mother. They couldn’t give a shit about any possible future husband, or their children (assuming their diseased, over-used and aging vaginas can still be fertilized.)

The way things are going, one thing is a virtual certainty: starting in the near future, they will not have it this good again for a very, very long time.

Absolutely. The article should have the sub-heading “And never will do again.”

It’s all downhill for them now, especially when they hit 30. Men are increasingly ignoring them except for sport-sex, and, with the exception of manginas, more guys are regarding women with increasing resentment and annoyance.

——————————————————-

At 12:24 AM, mikeray said…

More crazy women –

Joel McKiernan and Ivonne Ferguson, met at work and had a two-year extramarital affair. After the affair ended, Ferguson asked McKiernan to help her conceive. The two agreed McKiernan would not be obligated for child support if he acted as sperm donor. (Ferguson had had a tubal ligation and could only conceive by in vitro fertilization, or IVF.) She had another man pose as her husband, told the doctor it was her husband’s sperm, and had twins. McKiernan had little contact with the twins at first, but five years out Ferguson thought better of their agreement, sued McKiernan for child support, and won. In 2004, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the trial court’s decision ordering McKiernan to pay $1,500 a month to support the twins.

Deon Francois banked some frozen sperm at an NYU lab while he and his wife were trying to get pregnant. They broke up; he moved out, stopped paying the storage fee to NYU, and assumed NYU would discard the sperm. Instead, his estranged wife forged his signature on a release and notarized it with a stolen notary stamp. She used the release to get the sperm from NYU, which hadn’t discarded it; got pregnant; and then sought child support in her divorce case. The judge awarded her $150 per week.

In other cases women have inseminated themselves with sperm from fellatio or from a condom (or so their male acquaintances alleged), then sought child support – and won.

“Now that I’m dating ordinary women who have been around, it is truly sad how beat up they are – physically, emotionally and spiritually. It is beyond tragic.”

Its their own fault I’m afraid…

They are the ones who decided to rebel against the laws of God and man, and they will pay the price.

these articles, which are becoming more and more numerous, and reeking of greater and greater depravity, smack of desperation…

“Look at us! Over here!”

Desperately seeking a man that will set them straight instead of buckin and chuckin.

Ah well.

Duncan, excellent write-up my man!

——————————————————-

At 9:52 AM, Anonymous said…

A topic much discussed in this blog was commented on by Professors Gary Becker and Richard Posner in their blog entry on whether marriage should be subsidized www.becker-posner-blog.com . Excerpt:

“A serious social problem is created by the practice of some poor women of having children with no expectation that the father will participate in the support or upbringing of the children, but instead with the expectation that the government will support them. The practice–in which the role of government becomes that of financial father of children born out of wedlock–nurtures criminality and perpetuates poverty. Subsidizing the production of children by persons who because they are poor single parents lack the resources to support their children properly is highly dubious social policy.”

Check it out.
-Random economist

——————————————————-

At 12:31 PM, Frye said…

Sometimes I used to think that
I was in the minority view, but
after reading these comments
on Duncan’s Blog and other websites; I came to realize that
their were multitudes of other men
that thought the same way as me.
I don’t disagree with any of the
posts I have read in the past two
months. Keep up the good work and spread the news. (especially to the
guys in their 20’s – because they
are the most susceptible to the
modern western woman and their lawyers) United States suck now, but I believe we only have the silver medal. The British Isles definitely has won the gold in whoredom. P.S. -makes up for the world cup. LOL

——————————————————-

At 3:18 PM, Anonymous said…

Excellent article with commentary, Duncan. You, sir, are indeed a ‘wordsmith’. Thanks for putting into words what so many of us believe. It truly is GREAT to be single and not a limp-wristed mangina subjected to the unpredictable moods of a self-obsessed wannabe princess with an entitlement mentality.

——————————————————-

At 4:45 PM, nevo said…

You have not publish my post!
Why?

NEVO

——————————————————-

At 5:34 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Coldhammer;

In a word: KLR

——————————————————-

At 12:10 AM, Ba1anced said…

HEY, EB

Looks like the “pussy card” wins again? I can only wonder if a man would have gotten off of the same charges with prostate cancer or some other illness.

I love how the Women’s Institute of Spain is referred to as a “government agency” and no a feminist one.

Ba1anced

Houston, TX

——————————————————-

At 12:27 AM, Anonymous said…

Duncan:

I think your blog is very funny, I believe that you write very well, and that you are drawing attention to an important problem, BUT you should not give up on marriage entirely.

Spending your days playing video games, jerking off, and indulging in hobbies is a shallow existence. Even though feminism has made the majority of Western women harpies, there are still some good women out there if you look in the right places.

You don’t seem religious, but you do seem moral. Perhaps you could meet a nice girl at church. Religious women (the few that are left) are much more likely to believe in traditional marriage and want to be faithful wives and mothers.

I say, complete your degree, work toward gaining a respectable income (even though you will suffer higher taxes), and then you can attract a loyal wife with some work. Have 3+ kids and help stop the demographic decline of Europe.

Just giving up and being self-absorbed will not solve what feminism has done to the world.

——————————————————-

At 9:49 AM, Field Marshall Watkins said…

A man’s existence need not be defined by others in this day and age. The point is not to sacrifice your morals and standards just because you are surrounded by skanks and whores.

“Just giving up and being self-absorbed will not solve what feminism has done to the world.”

That I agree with, but to each their own. If Duncan was ‘giving up and being self-absorbed’ he wouldn’t be making the effort to do this blog would he?

“I say, complete your degree, work toward gaining a respectable income (even though you will suffer higher taxes), and then you can attract a loyal wife with some work. Have 3+ kids and help stop the demographic decline of Europe.”

Sounds like someone is imposing their own idea of morals on someone else to me. Screw going through feminised Universities to get a degree (in deep debt) coming out and being taxed ever more by the feminist Govt. just to attract a wife because of your income?

You’re missing the point of this blog aren’t you. A women who is attracted to a man because of his income is a prostitute. I don’t care what religious cult she aligns herself to or what excuses she makes. You also don’t seem to realise this little situation with the divorce laws do you? On top of men fighting through all the anti-male psy ops and becoming a ‘success’ (or what women see as success) there is a high probability that he will get completely robbed by with ‘loving doting’ wife. It happens all the time. Funny where the love goes when during divorce the soon-to-be ex starts her character defamation/ assassination, lying about all sorts and generally doing whatever it takes to financially and emotionally rape the honourable hard working man as much as she can.

No thanks. If that is how they are going to be, I would rather be single.

Guys, of course it’s normal to want to be with a decent nice intelligent girl, we probably all do. But take extra care to not fall for a bitch just because she’s around. I personally quite enjoy telling filthy skanks/ single mothers looking for an ATM machine with a dick/ other dumb ‘Cosmopolitan’ worshiping sheep where to go.

Guys are waking up to what’s happening. They know what the majority of women they are surrounded by are like and what a liability they are.

Job done.

——————————————————-

At 1:16 PM, Anonymous said…

Even though feminism has made the majority of Western women harpies, there are still some good women out there if you look in the right places.

I love how it always falls back on men to fix what women have screwed up. Despite 40+ years of “liberation” and the quest for “eek-wallet-eee”, it’s still the man who has to sort through the turds in hopes of finding a tootsie roll.

If all these “good women” who are supposed to be out there want mates, what is stopping them from being the ones to do the looking? In theory, they have as much to gain from finding a decent mate as the man does.

I say, complete your degree, work toward gaining a respectable income (even though you will suffer higher taxes), and then you can attract a loyal wife with some work. Have 3+ kids and help stop the demographic decline of Europe.

Just giving up and being self-absorbed will not solve what feminism has done to the world.

Wow, there you go, Duncan, it is now up to you and you alone to stop the demographic decline of Europe! Who could have guessed that one born to such humble beginnings would turn out to have such an important destiny?

/irony off

For men in countries where feminism has taken over, the goal is not to “solve” what feminism has done to the world, but simply to survive it in the best way possible. Marriage and fatherhood are the biggest crimes a man can commit these days. What is the current speculation regarding the fine which Paul McCartney is going to have to pay for those crimes? £56,000,000?

Sorry, being cannon fodder in this grand social experiment of the past few decades, or saving the leadership of Europe from their own bad ideology, decisions, and policies is something the average man just isn’t going to continue to do.

——————————————————-

At 2:43 PM, Anonymous said…

BUT you should not give up on marriage entirely.

Why? There is NOTHING in it for men anymore.

Spending your days playing video games, jerking off, and indulging in hobbies is a shallow existence.

Are you aware how women spend THEIR days?

Again, what is the motivation for a man to work for a family when the woman can take it all away and destroy everything he worked for on a whim? To enter into that arrangement is insanity.

Even though feminism has made the majority of Western women harpies, there are still some good women out there if you look in the right places.

Irrelevant. (A) Women are pathological liars. They can claim they are not feminists, but doesn’t mean it is so. (B) Women are fabulous actresses. They can put on quite convincing acts they are sweet and virtuous creatures. That is until the ring goes around her finger and the collar goes around his neck. (C) Women CAN and DO change. Often for the worse after the wedding.

You don’t seem religious, but you do seem moral. Perhaps you could meet a nice girl at church. Religious women (the few that are left) are much more likely to believe in traditional marriage and want to be faithful wives and mothers.

See points (A), (B), and (C) above. Women will say or do anything to get married (i.e., get their meal ticked punched). The sweet churchgoing girl can often be an act to snag a man. Born again skanks are known to hit churches looking for a sucker once the bad boys don’t want her anymore (looks shot). Church doesn’t mean anything these days anymore. It’s like celebrating Independence Day in the United States. Who reads the Declaration of Independence on July 4th and checks if the U.S. government is acting like the tyrannical government we overthrew (e.g., “He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.” — Thomas Jefferson from the Declaration of Independence). Similarly the church DOES NOT hold the behavior of modern women accountable to the standards of a good wife per the Bible. It’s all a hollow act much like modern society these days.

I say, complete your degree, work toward gaining a respectable income (even though you will suffer higher taxes), and then you can attract a loyal wife with some work. Have 3+ kids and help stop the demographic decline of Europe.

Why? Western governments have done everything in their power to shit on men. What do men owe the System?

Loyal wife? You can certainly pick the oxymorons. LOL

Just giving up and being self-absorbed will not solve what feminism has done to the world.

Actually turning our back on fucked up women and equally fucked up western governments WILL fix the problem. For example, I like to see how the west will defend itself against Islam if men refuse to join the military anymore (i.e., work for a government that is fucking them over 24/7).

Please read “Atlas Shrugged” some time by Ayn Rand (written by a woman no less — LOL).

YOU really need to stop being a Pollyanna.

——————————————————-

At 4:18 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Anonymous 12:27;

What a horrible Mangina you are.

Playing video games, indulging in hobbies and jerking off is a SHALLOW existence?

Are you INSANE?

You are denigrating one of the most delightful aspects of being a bachelor! You spend your time doing what you want, and are accountable to no one.

Work to attract a “loyal wife”?

What the bloody hell is a “loyal wife”? Ain’t never seen one of them beasties, at least not her in the colonies. Maybe you grow ’em different over in the U.K., but around these parts, women ain’t exactly “loyal”. Hell, you’d have a better shot at loyalty with a rabid pitbull.

Loyal.

Sheesh. Give me a break.

Woops. Gotta go. Time to jerk off!

Yeeha!

——————————————————-

At 4:25 PM, byrdeye said…

And the selfishness was beyond all reason. Nowhere was there even the remotest hint that these women would expend their energies, supposed talents or wealth on anyone or anything except themselves. Where was there any one whose ambition was to alleviate poverty? Or to find a cure for cancer? Or to solve any of the world’s problems? Not even a modest altruism anywhere to be seen.

I really DON’T think that Duncan’s approach is ‘giving up’. Quite the contrary. To cave in and marry under these ridiculous terms IS to give up. If we keep accepting these terms then things won’t get better. A society that dehumanizes men is not something we care to preserve. If it collapses then good riddance.

Anyhow, I don’t believe that the divorce rate for ‘church girls’ is any lower. I actually have heard it suggested that it might be slightly higher. Check your facts before falling for the old Church Girl myth. There are many ‘born again virgins’ that show up at church when they are getting old and skanked out putting on a guise of repentance so they can catch a sucker.

——————————————————-

At 6:48 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

From what I have read, and according to the Barna Group, a Christian research organization, the divorce rate in evangelical Christianity is actually higher than in the secular world.

Part of the problem is that pastors NEVER preach the sections of the Bible that warn men away from marriage, such as the admonitions of Paul in his letter to the Corinthians. Further, the constant and enlightening barrage of anti-woman verses in Proverbs and Ecclesiastes are ignored by Christians- period. So much for believing the Bible is the inerrant “word of God”.

The Christian churches have succumbed to the pursuit of money, and since women have 80% of the wealth in the U.S., and comprise the vast majority of the church- going population, pastors, being the neutered boys they are, aren’t going to risk offending the members of their “flock” that are responsible for their income.

Money talks, and never more so than in church.

Since the churches have become so weak and feminized, they no longer have the strength to keep out the loose women that would never been allowed in when Christianity was actually relevant and strong. The churches, regardless of denomination, are awash with worn-out strumpets looking to convince some poor shmuck that they are “born-again” and innocent, virginal flowers.

Balls.

I know far too many of these women, and this is one of the reasons I ultimately renounced Christianity. The hypocrisy of the situation was overwhelming. Pastors pandering to whores, and the pews filled with women with no more morals than the average prostitute. I am acquainted with three Christian pastors whose wives all committed adultery and left them (one with a woman).

I know one attractive gal at work who is a devout born-again Christian, but she is a lesbian. She claims to fight her urges, but regularly beds down other women in her church. Quite regularly, actually. Yet, she can quote scripture with the best of them. She claims she has never had one Christian woman refuse her advances yet. I believe her.

No, going to church is actually very dangerous for men. You might just drop your guard. Not a wise idea.

THREE children have won a share of the estate of a man said to be their sperm donor father after using tweezers to pluck his eyebrows for DNA testing as he lay dead in a hospital morgue.

In a landmark decision, the NSW Supreme Court yesterday granted administration of Willem Wijma’s estate to one of those children, ruling against his family’s wishes.

It is a judgment that raises questions about the legal rights of thousands of men who have donated sperm – and alarm among the men’s families who face sharing their inheritance with a stranger.

——————————————————-

At 2:12 AM, Mamonaku187 said…

“Since the churches have become so weak and feminized, they no longer have the strength to keep out the loose women that would never been allowed in when Christianity was actually relevant and strong. The churches, regardless of denomination, are awash with worn-out strumpets looking to convince some poor shmuck that they are “born-again” and innocent, virginal flowers.”

Damn right!

Scripture like this…

“Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression (1 Tim 2:11-15).”

… is NEVER taught in the churches.

It’s gotten so bad that I had to go “Ronin” and worship God on my own.

To the poster who claimed that Mr. D should “get up, get out, and get something”…

Its people like you that get Men stuck in hopeless situations.

Duncan’s template for resistance is the model that is going to bring the West to its knees.

No matter how tyrannical a State becomes, it can never fully escape its dependence on its best and brightest, namely MEN.

Feminism will collapse under its own weight; we only need to spread the word, sit back, and wait.

In the meantime… pass them Erotic videos!!

Mamo.

——————————————————-

At 4:19 AM, Anonymous said…

To all of you above who criticized me, calling me a Pollyanna and a mangina.

If all of us never reproduce, our bloodline (and anti-feminist genes) will not be passed on to the next generation. Currently, it’s the bad boys and manginas that are reproducing and not men with sense because of the Marriage Strike. I can’t think of a better strategy in FAVOR of feminism.

Luckily, the feminists are not reproducing very much either (assuming a person’s behavior is partially genetic, this is important for future generations).

Just letting your family line die out will not stop what is happening. Still try to marry but be very careful whom you choose, and also know that it could end badly. Just drawing attention to anti-feminism (which this blog does very well) is not enough. Presently, the population will just continue to shrink until Islam has repopulated Europe.

The Muslims are not feminists but do you really want them to inherit the world? As spoken by Cleopatra to Julius Cesar in the HBO series ‘Rome’, “A man with no sons is a man with no future.”

——————————————————-

At 2:16 PM, byrdeye said…

She claims to fight her urges, but regularly beds down other women in her church.

1) The Bible actually only speaks against male homosexuality – but not lesbianism.

2) Christians can sin as much as they want – since they’re forgiven, remember? Why do you think women love this religion so much? It requires zero logic or accountability and a man can suffer for all their sins.

——————————————————-

At 6:52 PM, Anonymous said…

To Anonymous said…

To all of you above who criticized me, calling me a Pollyanna and a mangina.

…

Presently the only thing women care about is money and being fucked to pieces by age 18. How could any society continue when greed and sluttiness are a virtue? These women don’t care because they live in the here and now and the future to them is far away. These are the women who will cry for young men to come and protect them or save them from Sharia law. But here is the catch, they aborted all the young men that would have came to their rescue. Couldn’t let a baby get in the way of slutting around now could we? Because of all this these sluts will end up getting a taste of Sharia law and not liking it but by then it will be too late. These irresponsible sluts have themselves to blame for what is coming. We cannot change this since we are not the ones who need to change the course and direction. These irresponsible fucked to pieces sluts need to wake the fuck up and figure out they’re not the center of the universe and muslims will stone them to death for being sluts.

——————————————————-

At 9:44 PM, Anonymous said…

@anon 4:19 AM

There is nothing wrong with letting your bloodline die out. For most of us, it’s not as though we have rare surnames or bloodline that perpetuating descendants is essential.

In fact, as the society/world slides down to hell, it is even more imperative that you do not breed. This site already outlined all the reasons why a man should stay unmarried, not even co-habit. Legal bias, spoiled entitlement princess all around you etc etc. I can think of another reason: not letting your kids be born in this sorry world. Mercy on them.

Also, some others mention the woes of the church – there is a difference between real Christianity (eg minimal cares for wealth, obedient to teachings, a real reverence for God) to fake apostate ‘Churchianity’ you see everywhere nowadays (mega million dollar church building, prosperity gospel, go through the motion on Sundays,
grace = license to sin (and have affair with someone else on the same pew) etc. You don’t need to be a Christian to smell the bullshit.

——————————————————-

At 10:25 PM, Duncan Idaho said…

I think Anonymous above, who last posted at 4:19 AM, does have some good points in theory and I truly respect them.

I really wanted, as a youngster, to eventually get married and pass on my genes and be the Patriarch of a big family.

But sadly, indeed, it is pointless now. Marriage is too risky, most women are not worth marrying, and quite frankly it takes a great deal of effort for me to give a shit about this country or this continent anymore.

I’m not religious incidentally, but I have heard the same thing many times over from religious guys, that churches are indeed feminised, vicars and priests demand men to do their Godly duty (protect and provide) but don’t demand women do theirs (keep their legs shut), and that the pews are full of slutty ‘born again’ single mothers looking for a sucker in the church now that the thugs in the biker/rock clubs have stopped paying attention to their tattooed saggy arses.

——————————————————-

At 11:04 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Anonymous 4:19;

When you were referred to as a Mangina, it wasn’t an attempt to offend you as such. It’s just an observation.

The points you are missing, and I suspect many in our own movement are missing as well are these:

1) Western society is collapsing, and there is nothing we can do to stop it.

2) Western society DESERVES to collapse, and we should not TRY and stop it.

I say again:

WE DESERVE TO COLLAPSE!

We have had a rare and wonderful opportunity in the west to have semi-democratic states, and unprecedented wealth and education, at least by comparison to virtually all societies before us. Our women have become so foul- so VILE- that there is no hope of breeding another generation that will be anything but worse than the one that preceded it. Most men are so weak that they are beyond hope.

We in the west have allowed our societies to crumble. We have allowed our governments to become corrupt (George Bush, anyone?). We have allowed women to have power that all other societies wisely kept from them. We, as men, for the most part, have become weak, spineless fools.

There is a price to be paid for this insanity, and it will require the destruction of the west. it is unavoidable.

Men such as myself simply advocate living for one’s self, and living as well as possible. Spread the word when possible to help save a few other men, but don’t waste time trying to repair society.

IT WON’T WORK!

Save your efforts, my friend. The government, church, women and most men are beyond hope.

——————————————————-

At 11:11 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Another note to our friend, the Mangina:

Yes, in a way, I DO want the Muslims to inherit the world.

Barbaric? You betcha.

Necessary? You damn-double-betcha.

We no longer have the strength to fight women and put them in place. The few of us who are man enough to do the job are grossly out-numbered by male drones of the Matriarchy. Only the Muslims, blood-thirsty freaks that they are, will be able to restore some sense of sanity to society by literally killing off women who won’t obey. More power to them.

I think I may start studying the Koran soon….

——————————————————-

At 10:16 AM, Anonymous said…

Playing games, jerking off is a shallow existence. Duncan h9mself says that women do not do anything worthy today anymore. Men start do act like them.

But what can I do? Marrying is far too risky, so I am confined to an existence that might be shallow, but at least is more secure.

——————————————————-

At 1:57 PM, other said…

Mamonaku187 said…

“No matter how tyrannical a State becomes, it can never fully escape its dependence on its best and brightest, namely MEN.”

Isn’t this one of the reasons why the USA and UK are allowing uncontrolled immigration?

If the population is dwindling because western women want their “careers” then they just strip another country for human resources. And this policy will allow our respective governments to continue their scheme of turning the world into a police state.

There seems to be a plan in the UK to shut down all women’s prisons within a decade and replace them with men’s prisons.

——————————————————-

At 5:15 PM, Anonymous said…

Let’s see. Get married. Have a boy? Watch him get chewed up by the feminized System. Have a girl? Watch her turned into a sluttish, money shark like her mother. You? Work in a feminized soul destroying job, watch 1/2 your earnings stolen by taxes and inflation, have your “loyal wife” and society laugh and shit on you the whole time, then you get to be ass raped and destroyed in the end when sweetie pie decides to cash out of the marriage you stupidly worked so hard to build. Yep. Sounds like a good deal to me. LOL

Don’t be a douchebag. You would have to be a selfish idiot (i.e., a Woman) to want to bring a child into such a evil system.

Nothing cleanses like a good Dark Age. Bring it on Islam. When they start beheading the sluts and manginas in public I will be watching with a bowl of popcorn! LOL

——————————————————-

At 10:46 PM, Anonymous said…

I got one for ya. Since women are just like men. Why not do away with the special womens section of prisons and allow those darlings to co-habitate with the scum they loved on the outside so much. LOL! Can we say fucked to pieces?

——————————————————-

At 6:28 AM, k-dog said…

Had to comment on Anonymous 11:36 pm and the Australian story about the sperm donor whose estate was split among the children he fathered through his donation.

This story and recent stories about “sperm donors” who later have to pay child support in the US and elsewhere all have this in common: the “donation” took place without involving a normal sperm bank or a doctor. Go through the proper channels and a sperm donor to a sperm bank should be safe for now.

However, you can expect this to change as the fembots become more intent on making men pay. In Virginia a bill introduced in the General Assembly would have removed anonymity from sperm donors. It did not pass, but what little media coverage there was did not explain the intent or application of the proposal.

To my way of thinking, if a couple is infertile, perhaps somebody higher up is trying to tell them something; and instead of spending large sums on infertility treatments, sperm donors, etc., the couple should investigate adopting one of the many children who need a home. Just a thought; maybe it’s out of line.

As for me, I ain’t settin’ foot in a sperm bank. The $50 or whatever isn’t worth the future risk.

——————————————————-

At 1:51 PM, Mamonaku187 said…

“If the population is dwindling because western women want their “careers” then they just strip another country for human resources. And this policy will allow our respective governments to continue their scheme of turning the world into a police state.”

You got it!

In the American experience, the overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants are male.

They are a commodity to be used to, as you said earlier, keep the economy humming.

But feminism is spreading, even to Mexico, the bastion of Machismo.

Our Puppet Master friends fail to realize that they are literally killing the Golden Goose.

No workers = no Tyrannical regime.

——————————————————-

At 4:04 PM, byrdeye said…

Men found guilty of jealousy or indifference could face up to five years in prison, the newspaper said. Mexico’s individual states will determine the punishments, it said.

Wow, WTFFFFFF???????? 😮

They really are trying to prevent all marriages now! What kind of dickless AFC would get married with laws like these???

——————————————————-

At 11:23 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

That law in Mexico is serious business. It has teeth unlike anything we have to worry about in the U.S. – yet.

Also, ponder the equally insane new laws of that sort in Spain and India, and the laws in France that can put you behind bars for publicly saying >anything< against women or homo’s.

The simplest method of dealing with this for the time being is to have no social contact with women for any reason. Most men won’t do this, so they will continue to be fodder for the Matriarchal War On Men, but the wise among us will heed these words and avoid women like the plague they are.

——————————————————-

At 7:05 AM, Anonymous said…

Men found guilty of jealousy or indifference could face up to five years in prison, the newspaper said. Mexico’s individual states will determine the punishments, it said.

So how is the husband supposed to react if for example, he comes home early from work one day and catches his wife bonking some stranger on the marriage bed?

——————————————————-

At 5:18 PM, Christopher in Oregon said…

Anon 7:05;

My brother came home and found his wife in bed with another woman. He divorced her and she got the kids, house….everything. Plus 73% of his income in alimony and child support. With VAWA, the situation is often far worse.

No man is safe marrying any woman in any country today. The laws- utterly insane laws- are popping up around the world. Ten years ago, no one would have ever dreamed that laws like the ones in Mexico could have ever been passed anywhere.

Yet, they have, with nary a whimper from anyone. The decline of society is accelerating, and we can’t stop it. All a man can do is protect himself, and by that I mean:

To be truly safe, a man can have no social dealings with any woman anywhere. At my place of employment, it states in the HR manual that if you ACCIDENTALLY brush up against someone (a woman) and she decides to claim sexual harassment ( even if it was an accident) you WILL be charged and can be terminated- on her word alone. If she doesn’t like the look on your face, she can again charge you with “leering”, and you can be fired. Any conversation that makes her “uncomfortable” can be considered sexual harassment. If you and your wife are both employed, and someone see’s you holding hands or kissing, and it makes her uncomfortable, she can charge you with sexual harassment. (This actually happened)

The laws are going to get much worse than what we are seeing right now. Don’t be caught with a wife when they do.

——————————————————-

At 5:23 PM, Anonymous said…

The people responsible for orchestrating this situation want it precisely as it is. Step one: disenfranchise fathers and men. Women naturally return to their asocial, destructive behavior because – unlike men – they have no consistent internal monologue, hence no moral basis to govern their actions. They might be taught to behave at a young age, but as newer generations are increasingly raised by women only, over time they lose what values the last decent male bestowed upon the family line. The end result: complete social destruction as all values are lost and people become amoral, asocial loners. Gradually, the state takes over all aspects of control over the populace, as people increasingly lose the capacity to manage even the minutest aspects of their lives.

Soon artificial wombs will become a reality; and with them, the perpetuation of the system will be guaranteed. When you think about it, THX-1138 is in fact quite realistic by today’s standards. There will be no “MGTOW” in such a system. However, there’s one last point worth mentioning: whether or not men choose to marry in the present system makes little difference in terms of the outcome; it can merely be delayed by a few more men holding together the present system which by design is operating increasingly to undermine their influence and thus ability to maintain a stable society (in that sense, MGTOW is the best thing to come along as it hastens the implementation of the ultimate outcome)

By the way, the crucial difference between the last days of Rome and the last days of western civilization: technology and pharmaceuticals.

Male voice (medicine cabinet): What’s wrong?
Man: I need something stronger. Male voice (medicine cabinet): Take four red capsules. In 10 minutes, take two more. Help is on the way.

——————————————————-

At 12:29 PM, Anonymous said…

Check out the masculist meme! terrifying stuff. there’s no point in trying to uphold the west. let it die and laugh at it