Monday, June 17, 2013

The Seattle Central Library -designed by Rem Koolhaas and Joshua
Prince-Ramus, members of the Dutch Office of Metropolitan Architecture (OMA), in
conjunction with the Seattle firm LMN Architects- is certainly one of
the most influential public buildings today.
Controversial, as many of the works by Koolhaas, it attracts followers
and detractors; however, with more than 2 million visitors per year and the
huge catalyst effect in the revitalization of the urban environment, no one questions its social success.

Andrew Carnegie, the steel magnate who built libraries across the U.S. sponsored in 1906 the construction of the Seattle Carnegie Library, made in neoclassical style in a plot located on the Fourth Avenue.

Over the years it became necessary to have an extension, so that in 1960 a 5-story building was erected in modern international style, designed by Bindon
& Wright, replacing the old library.
Again, the demand exceeded the capacity of the library, coupled by the scarcity of parking areas and the seismic risk, which determined the need of constructing of a new library in the late 90s.

CONCEPTION

Joshua Prince-Ramus highlights three key ideas in the design of the project:
a) A hyper-rational process of design, in which rational ideas acquire an
independent logic and result in images that seem irrational (at first
glance the library seems product of a designer's whim rather than an analytical process).
b) A team work in the design process, leaving aside the image of the
architect-genius, but an interactive work between several members of the
office.

c) Confronting the traditional view of flexibility in modern architecture which, according to him, makes spaces more generic where almost anything can happen
within them, but in practice they are filled by the most immediate need,
which ends imposing itself to other activities.
Instead, he proposed the "compartmentalized flexibility", which
identifies a number of places that, even if an activity is prominent, it can be ensured a spectrum of multiple functions.

OMA based its design on the idea that books are the most important source
of information that people use in the library, without neglecting many other forms of technology that are available today by the user.
But perhaps the most revolutionary aspect was its idea that the library should also meet social roles (something to which librarians were reluctant at first).
OMA reorganized the program proposed by them in 5 platforms whose
function could be predicted to be stable in the future (administration,
books storage, meeting space, information and parking ). On top of each platform four open spaces were located , whose function could become more unstable.

The conceptual model has these two types of spaces defined inside boxes, with
open spaces at the top and circulation systems linking the various
elements. These boxes are moved in order to make better use of natural light and enjoy views of the city. Since each of these platforms houses different functions, various areas were assigned to them. Note the similarity with the diagram of the program with the actual section of the building.

Subsequently these compartments were covered by a "skin" of glass
and metal structure providing shade or light according to the required
needs.

This was one of the things that I liked about the library, its visual
integration to the surrounding urban landscape and its
clear understanding of the interior spaces, that dramatizes the
tension between them. Other contemporary libraries, such as the Sendai Mediatheque and the Tama Library , both designed by Toyo Ito in Japan, have also chosen transparency and a clear integration to the environment.

DESIGN

The building contains 38,300 m2 of built area in 11 stories and a basement parking.

Something that is not very evident in the pictures is that there is a
pronounced topographical difference between the 4th and 5th Avenue, which can accommodate two
levels.

Especially in the front of the Fourth Avenue can be seen the imposing overhang, 14 m. long, generating a covered plaza, an effect
that somehow reminded me of that square generated in front of the Peckham Library in London .

The lowest level, to the southwest, which is accessed from the 4th Avenue, contains an auditorium, a language center and a Children's Center
whose decoration aims to "be appreciated by children, although it is
not condescending to them" (this allows a 11 years old child not to feel uncomfortable by sharing the same space with a 5 years old). The second level corresponds to the administration and it is practically not seen by the public. The third level, which is reached from the 5th Avenue, is the reception area. Outside, the skin of the facade is anchored to the floor forming a sort of entrance porch.

Upon entering the building we were welcomed by a large square bathed in light,
adorned with fountains and gardens, providing a warm refuge from the
cold climate in Seattle.

The space becomes a large room where users can enjoy reading in a
comfortable chair, sipping a coffee (which is a local favorite... it is not by chance that this city is the birthplace of Starbucks Coffee).

The fourth level contains meeting areas, arranged in more organic spaces which can accommodate up to 200 people.
The fifth floor houses the largest number of public computers, where users can get access to more specific research materials, for which there are several librarians
ready to help.
Spatially, it is located in the middle of the building, overlooking the square and allowing visual contact with the street and with the upper levels.

From the sixth to the ninth level lies one of the most innovative areas of the building: the spiral of books.
Contrary to the classic horizontal library, the shelves are organized
in large sloped platforms, which run continuously through ramps (a
"cheap parking for books," says Joshua Prince-Ramus). Reading rooms, which for reasons of function have to be horizontal, are placed staggered along the ramps.

The tenth floor, which is the highest level that can be accessed by the public, is the reading area​​. From here stunning views of the city can be enjoyed, particularly to the Elliott Bay.
Here is also a small balcony at the end of a corridor which, according to Joshua
Prince-Ramus "it was designed it in order to ask my wife to marry me... and she
accepted."
Actually this small space is a viewpoint to appreciate the spatial richness of the
building and its wrapping glass and steel skin.
I think the designers created this small balcony just for us architects to enjoy this remarkable space.

Photo courtesy of Katya Palladina

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

The building represented a particular challenge, as the region is prone
to earthquakes and strong winds, and the shape of the building has
large overhangs that give it a light appearance, but require a special
structural design. The structural solution is based on a solid concrete core holding cantilever slabs (a solution also frequently applied in skyscrapers ). This solution allows to minimize the number of columns needed inside the space.

In addition, vertical and inclined columns and trusses were created.
The floors that make up the Spiral of Books and Reading Room (6-10 stories) use leaning columns in order to transfer the weight of the upper floors.

Finally, the wrapping diamond shaped grid serves as a structural clamping element. It contains a glass coating which has a thin metal layer
that allows transparent views only from the inside.

A external steel grid is superimposed to an aluminum inner grid to hold the glass, both painted light blue. I must say, however, that the finishing is a bit rough.

Additionally, there are works of art such as that of Ann Hamilton, who designed a 670 m2 carved wooden floor containing phrases written in 11 different languages, which
suggests a "tactile experience of the book in the digital age".

It is also fun, going down the escalator, to find some "Talking Egg Heads" called "Braincasts", made by artist Tony Oursler.
Outside, the Tsutakawa fountain, also called "The Power of Wisdom" was
sculpted in bronze by noted local artist George Tsutakawa.

****

Despite some criticism due to the way Koolhaas and OMA perceive architecture, different than traditional approaches, it is clear that the library in Seattle is a
social success.
Our visit occurred during a week day and we found the library was full of people. I was pleased to find users of all ages and social groups (including many homeless who frequent the library on cold days).

Less known is, however, his works as interior and furniture designer. This post focuses precisely on the Savoy Restaurant in Helsinki, which still retain some of his original designs.

View from the old terrace, before being covered with glass, for obvious climatic reasons ( Helsinki is at latitude 60)

Opened in 1937, the Savoy is a luxury restaurant located at the top of the Industrial building, which was not designed by Aalto.

It consists of two areas, one indoor area and the terrace overlooking the Esplanadi Park, one of the most important public spaces of Helsinki. In addition, there are some exclusive banqueting cabinets.

Lobby at the restaurant entrance.

Originally the restaurant interior was designed by Alvar Aalto and his
wife Aino, in collaboration with textile artist Dora Jung. The construction was carried out by Artek Oy.

Views and details of the living room

View to the terrace

Esplanade Park View from the terrace.

Despite being a luxury restaurant, Aalto rejects the glitz and instead he choose
simple , austere, minimalist style, creating a warm and intimate atmosphere of elegant proportions. Among the designed elements are the club chairs by Aino Aalto and the luminaires by Alvar Aalto.

Detail of the luminaires

The restaurant also contains a display of the famous Savoy vase,
designed in 1936, which consists of a hyperbolic curve surface which folds
sinuously along two similar curvatures of different radii.

The design, as Aalto was inspired by the Finnish Eskimos girls' breeches.In the words of Professor Jan Michl, "it represents the qualities of the
quintessential Finnish design: originality, openness and aesthetic
sophistication."

The Savoy vases were placed on each table and allowed the flowers to be arranged in different ways.

Despite its name, the vases were not made exclusively for the
restaurant, but were part of a collection for Karhula and Iittala factory
for the Paris International Exposition in 1937. In fact, the shape of the vase is similar to Aalto's Finnish Pavilion built for that Expo.

Finland Pavilion, by Alvar Aalto.Paris Exposition, 1937

Since the first vases were made using wooden molds, their surfaces were slightly more textured than they are today. A curious fact is that originally, after the glass hardened, the wooden mold was burned in order to release the vase.

Currently the Savoy vase rights have been acquired by the restaurant, and it is now called Aalto Vase.

Left: detail of the floor.Right: the restaurant was so expensive that we could only afford to eat a dessert (it was such a treat!).In the background you can see the Aalto vase, still used on each table.

MY ARCHITECTURAL MOLESKINE

MY ARCHITECTURAL MOLESKINE

Notes on the fly throughout an exciting journey, a logboof of emotions and senses while walking between architectural spaces bathed in light, surrounded by landscape, or being part of it.

Just like in a moleskine - that notebook where travelers compiled writings and drawings of their visits- this blog offers you, dear reader, my own collection based on my personal experience about interesting sites visited in recent years.

Welcome to My Architectural Moleskine

"What I hear, I forget; what I read, I remember; what I do, I learn; what I teach, I know."

Old Chinese proverb.

About me

Architect and urban designer, professor in universities in Peru and Russia. Post PhD. researcher on urban design and landscape in Japan. Earned his PhD in Urban Environmental Planning at Kyoto University, Japan and Master degrees in Sustainability in Argentina and Environmental Management in Peru.

The texts, graphics and photos, unless otherwise stated, belong to the author of this blog.They may be used for personal and academic purposes, as long as the respective authors and source are acknowledged.Its use is not allowed for commercial purposes.