Entitled Careerist Woman Logo

Petition to make this the official logo of the modern, Western, feminist, entitled careerist woman.

“I watch you die.”

Ugly, bloated Western woman dressed in the latest fashion sits idly with look of perplexity as a man in distress collapses before her leaden gaze. She even leans away from him, offended at this breach of protocol. Another woman seated nearby joins her in the sitting. The men around them rise to help the stricken man.

It’s a peculiar time when men rush to help another man out while women dawdle uselessly, their nurturing instincts vacuumed out of them by decades of feminist indoctrination and consumerist rat-racing. Another bell tolls for the West.

Could someone make a gif of the relevant portions of this video? And then plaster Jizzabel’s comment wall with it?

alpha fucks and beta bucks
dat is how we roll
da butthexting cockass we fucks and sucks
and in our anuthes it doth deosul
alpha fucks and beta bucks
it is da way of da fed
to transfer assetss to dose who butthext
cuckold dose who pay for our bread
beta bucks and alpha fucks
it’s what day teach us we;’re entitled too
da assetts from betas we plucks
after da alphas desol us through our hole for poo
lzozozlzzolzlzlzlz
cuckold da betas cockhold da alphas
datsz what day taught us in mba grad school
as da feiisnsits see no truth nor justice in their laws
and say da great books for menz was all fools.
yes, yes, i did very good on my gmats
dey bernenakifed my soul away, left me with cats

I’m not gonna lie. When I first came here I always skipped all of GBFM’s posts because they’re as tucker max’s dick when he’s secretly taping the butthexing of anal virgins. Plust the spelling/grammer annoyed me. These days, I just read ’em and zlzlzolzolz

The Liberal party in Australia (despite its name, the party of the Right) is not very liberal in the American sense. It is currently led by a socially conservative Catholic and was previously led by a socially conservative Protestant. It is in coalition with the National Party, which is more conservative still and traditionally represents country and regional interests.

Such action presupposes a radical frame of mind. A conservative one, given the presence of millions of non-whites, legal and not, will take the easiest approach — registration, longer queues, and all that bureaucratic semblance of protecting the interests of the founding stock.

The trouble with conservatives is that they will try to conserve that which they are too weak to attack.

You are being too etymological. By your way of thinking, feminists and the left are “conservative” because they want to “conserve” the prevailing regime and culture. And yet nobody calls them that because everyone has a workable understanding of the concepts beneath the practical labels. (Let’s not get started on the word “liberal,” cognate of “liberty.”) No conservative properly understood wants “registration, longer queues, and all that bureaucratic semblance.”

I prefer to think in terms of right and left, and radical and complacent. The left is totalitarian, collective, and group-dependent; the right is autonomous, self-sufficient, and “liberal” (“libertarian”) by way of returning to the institutions that once preserved autonomy, self-sufficiency, and liberty. Further, one can be radical or complacent in the pursuit of preserving or eliminating the present leftist drift in the west.

I am radical-right; I demand a rebirth of the institutions of liberty. You are radical-left insofar as you identify yourself primarily with your race collective, have contempt for the western institutions between you and your goals, and advocate a totalitarian standard of victory.

Most people are complacent left or right, having gauzy half-notions of the general direction they prefer, but with no intellectual heft behind their prejudices which therefore tend to sway in the weather.

That was all quite fair and I could do no more than quibble (for example, the old lib-con mantra, launched by von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, that n.s. was “leftism”, heavy square quotes).

But to sharpen my original point: no conservative agenda is equal to the reforms that would be necessary for large-scale, lasting course-correction. That’s why they are called conservative. Restoring institutions sounds like a worthy project, but it does not bodily remove thirty-million Mexicans, or a hundred-thousand Somalis, and so on. Nor does it neutralize those who encourage such madness.

If the political ideology which alone were able to handle such matters be “leftism”, then I suppose I am a “leftist”, but it’s obvious that as much contradiction exists between my ideology and radical Jews’ as that between conservatives too weak to attack and leftists who “conserve” the fruits of their radical campaigns.

Thanks for the high-level reference, BTI. I will read it. We need more connection with the best that has been thought and said. None of our problems are truly new.

Of course, uh, we must the nerve to “bodily remove thirty-million Mexicans,” but the mere insistence of this from our severe minority amounts to so much ineffectual whining. The real way to do that is to recover the institution of proper citizenship, which before the “reforms” of 1965 were far more practically restrictive than “give me your tired, your poor.”

Our differences are about method. We are both interested in getting from A to B, but I incorporate the pragmatism required to get there more intrinsically to my thinking than you do. It’s not enough to just fearlessly declare the problems the majority feel more comfortable ignoring and hoping will go away. We also must create a feasible, comprehensive battle plan that includes what baby step we must take today.

… conservatives too weak to attack and leftists who “conserve” the fruits of their radical campaigns.

True, as long as it is clear that this is not a problem of ideology so much as it is a problem with the failure of nerve you cite (“too weak to attack”). The bourgeois merchants in middle America are disposed against radicalism — it would ruin their livelihood. But since their livelihood is being ruined by others anyway, they have nothing to lose by becoming radical.

There has been a popular uprising by the bourgeoisie against Obama and Pelosi, though it remains placid, if not dormant, for now. When/if it becomes clear that their ruination cannot be prevented by the normal constitutional means they so admire, I don’t think they will be shy about radicalizing quickly. After all, the other component of their civic worship is the founding of this country in violent revolution. We have “conserved” that Lockean institution which gives us the right to rebel. The only question is how well have we conserved it.

Have the men become too domesticated and feminized to indemnify their liberty with a real threat to revolt? Are we too pussy to pledge our “lives, fortunes, and sacred honor” on what we believe, or is griping about it in dark corners such as these sufficiently cathartic to maintain complacency?

I am obviously less pessimistic on that score than you are. It never takes consensus or even plurality to spark radical change. It merely requires leadership — “One man with courage makes a majority” — consistency of principle, and a fidelity to the truth. Once it is demonstrated that radicalism of our stripe may speak frankly and survive, the masses will find its vicarious courage to at least remain neutral while better men fight on their behalf. Once the samizdat we pass around here finds just a 5% acceptance in the culture — that is, once our voice is liberated from ghetto status — the gains will become exponential. It’s all in the timing. If we peak too soon or depart our pseudonymity (“Publius” anyone?) and unpopularity too quickly, we get mowed down quickly.

The bloke, Simon Sheikh, who had the seizure is a Soros funded ultra left liberal and HE not Sophie is the radical feminist.

Sophie Mirabella likely thought he was involved in a stunt; personally I’d be slow to want to touch the guy myself.

Though no one takes the organisation ‘GetUp’ he fronts seriously, they’re given airtime because the ‘ABC’ is a taxpayer funded ultra left liberal public broadcaster – and jokes themselves all over Australia.

It’s all status games. Men do ’em too–it’s how you get to the top in any organization. Of course, you’re actually expected to be able to do things too in some cases.

You’re expected to know what the group alpha (ie Heartiste) knows (ie jizzabel=Jezebel) and people fall over themselves to go on about how funny GBFM is when, frankly, while he gets off a couple of good phrases (alpha fucks and beta bucks) I think he could do without the endless ‘lzzlolzlzolz’ and the butthate about ben bernanke (yeah, fine, you think we should go back to the gold standard…like greenspan was so much better? you think any fed chairman who doesn’t go along with the elite’s policies is going to get appointed?)

OK, fine, I could figure out the jizzabel thing. But, really, this sort of thing is everywhere.

The guy who tried to save this soulless, dead eyed, heroin addicted whore was a hopeless idiot. Nobody deserves to be beaten to death, but one wonders what exactly he hoped to accomplish with this waste of flesh.

Holy sh–. Just before reading anonymous’ post above, I was reminded of a nature video that has traumatized me. It was a pack of large baboons. The dominant male killed a subordinate male. A week or so later, the subordinate male’s ex-girlfriend allowed the dominant male to mount her. The dead male’s offspring looked on either perplexed or in horror.

It might sound funny or pathetic or both, but I think about that video all the time. I wonder how our females could be equally amoral as another primate if society allows it. Are we there yet? Can we stop it?

Suller’s sugarbaby is a 6 at best to me but I can see why a lot of other men over 35 would consider her the best they could get ever, especially if they stupidly decide to live in feminist places like the UK where young women like that don’t normally date relatively rich older men like himself (cuz that wouldn’t be “equal”).

He died because he couldn’t get a hot young woman who wasn’t a drug addict to want him at least as a sugar daddy. The economy is so good in the UK that higher class girls her age could easily work for minimum wage and wouldn’t need an older man with a job to support them.

This was the cause of death. If he’d moved to a non-english speaking country, he would have been able to date a woman of her youth and looks who wasn’t a lower class heroin addict.

I think she’s a naturally repressed person who did what those do in that type of situation – clearly signaled by body language her alarm, redirected attention thereby, and pinged off others waiting for the appropriate move.

What I did not see was a lack of compassion – her recovery time from a concerned state was much slower.

Her initial phase of alarm and disgust at the creepy body space invasion didn’t strike me as unjustified. It was amusing to watch her peck her neck like a chicken, struggling between fear and concern.

However tough this chick may act on TV (I haven’t seen her in action), the brief moments I watched of her revealed her fundamental insecurities, weakness and low social status. It’s too bad she’s getting crucified for this undeservedly. I’d much rather see one of the true pigs getting butchered.

Reckon you missed the mark on this one. I mean, sure she’s a cold bitch and all that, but the thing next to him is no man – it is a bleeding heart feminist vegan wanker. I’d have been more likely to finish the job than help him too.

I was thinking that, too. But the idea of a woman waiting for men to handle a crisis situation and then – only then, of course – taking part so as to seem caring and compassionate while avoiding any personal danger/responsibility is so crazy as to be unbelievable. Amirite?

This man said eff you to the divorce-industrial complex — and, more importantly, to his greedy bitch of an ex-wife (and LOL at the Daily Mail for calling him the “world’s worst dad”):

A Canadian father-of-four has been dubbed the ‘world’s worst dad’ after he ‘abandoned’ his children for a new life in the Philippines.

Hans Mills ditched his ten-year-old cancer sufferer son Steven, daughters Jackie, 14, who has Down Syndrome and Maggie, 17, who is fighting depression, and his eldest boy, a 19-year-old drug addict.

The 53-year-old education software expert said a court ruling which made him pay $4,000 a month to his ex-wife in child support would financially ruin him.

And so, with extensive work contacts in South East Asia, he sent his former love Donna Mills an email saying he had left the country for good.

He wrote on November 2, 2011: ‘The result of the legal instrument you recently designed and implemented is there’s no possibility of a comfortable life or (secure) retirement for me in Canada at all.

‘Therefore I have left the country to seek greener pastures elsewhere, and will never return. Well done Einstein. Good luck and goodbye.’

It saw him join the legion of 120,000 parents in Ontario wanted for being in arrears on spousal and child support payments.

Speaking to thestar.com from his new Manila home, he said he blamed a ‘broken’ Family Court system that ‘forced him to cut and run’.

He said: ‘I did a terrible, awful thing, because I had no reasonable option. I miss my children terribly. I abandoned Canada, but not my children.

‘My hope is some day I reconcile with my children, but not in Canada, a morally bankrupt state. The Philippines is about as far as I could go. If I’d a spaceship I’d be much further away.’

He said his children were ‘innocent bystanders who got caught in the crossfire’ and added that it was ‘not my intention to hurt them’.

He also revealed he would ‘never, ever, ever, ever’ pay spousal support nor return to Canada. It is a blow for his ex-wife, who has spent eight months trying to get Ontario’s Family Responsibility Office to find him.

And if he’s a real alpha, the fact that he has a 17 year old daughter does not logically take him out of the sexual marketplace for hot young women. I didn’t see the Filipina he remarried to but I’ll bet she’s over 30. I say that because he would have had to be a pathetic Canadian beta just for what he’d already given up to his exwife before she wanted even more. That million dollar home should have been sold and the cash squirreled away in different places long ago.

And what the ugly ex wife wanted was revenge not so much the cash itself. She wanted to totally destroy him and make sure he could not date any woman younger than herself.

Forget the 17yo. The fourteen-year-old with Down Syndrome will be an order of magnitude easier to close. Tighter too.

Hell, go after them all. Their daddy issues are now internationally famous. That tabloid piece was a worldwide dispatch proclaiming to men of every nation, “Here there soon be sluts.” Their busted family is now a cranked-up incubator of manic promiscuity.

How’s that divorce working out for you, mom? She “liberated” herself on the ruins of her children’s psychological stability. This is the dramatic, bloody conclusion of the feminist’s script. She dismantled the family, all right, she got what she and Friedan wanted.

The seventeen-year-old is struggling with “depression”! You don’t say! That’s the least of it. What carousels she is destined to ride.

Just a pro tip. If someone passes out, it might be due to low blood pressure. Dehydration, medication, cardiac problems, etc.

DO NOT SIT THE PERSON UP.

That will cause an immediate drop in blood supply to the brain, possibly causing a stroke. I autopsied a guy who tried to sit up to get from his bed to the ambulance stretcher. He was suffering from dehydration due to diarrhea. Raising his head killed him. No blood, no oxygen, no life. People have died from passing out, due to low blood pressure from medication, in phone booths.

Instead, gently lower them to the floor, and elevate the legs slightly.

But, this happened in a news room. A good illustration of what ignorant, stupid, pompous people they are.

BTW, according to my sources, the best place in the world to have a cardiac arrest is not in the hospital. In fact, it is the worst place. Almost nobody goes home from the hospital if they have a cardiac arrest while in the hospital. An American casino gives you the highest chance to survive. Why? Because everybody is always being watched, at least on camera. And, the employees are trained in CPR.

Guess I’ll post here on a bit of a tangent, but I’m wondering about the relationship between drama and the female ego. A girl at work is constantly complaining about her boyfriend (some real stupidity involving his dogs, and how they moved into an apartment that doesn’t allow pets…uh, yeah)…but this isn’t unusual. I’ve known her for months, and we’re sort of friends at work, and she’s always talking about the drama in her life.

Thing is, she never actually asks me about me, doesn’t really care either. I tell her about things in my life, and she turns the subject back about her drama (today she even interrupted me mid-sentence while I was telling her about my dad to say something bitter about her ex boyfriend from three years ago).

First, I think she might have depression: She might need drama to get her feeling *something* vital, anger can be a temporary relief from melancholy. But the second thing I’m just starting to put together, so I submit it for critique: female ego = attention = drama. This doesn’t make sense to most men: We can’t stroke our egos by telling everyone how crappy our lives are, but this is a thing for women. It’s probably genuinely a thing that occasionally women will intentionally insert drama in their lives just to have something to talk about with their girlfriends.

What do you think? I guess a lot about this woman starts to make sense once I look at it as ego gratification. Otherwise I’m left trying to figure out how to solve her problems (first error: she doesn’t actually *want* a solution), and then trying to figure out why I’m trying to solve her problems (second error: total misunderstanding about what her problem actually is).

This reminds of a woman I used to date who was actually diagnosed with bipolar disorder — the serious kind, not the pop-psych kind that everyone gets diagnosed with now.

I don’t know what your intentions are here, but a few notes:

1). Your part about not-wanting a solution is spot-on. Mine complained to me once when I offered some advice saying “It’s a male thing to want to solve problems.” She got that from an idiotic women’s studies course. Never try and solve a woman’s problems (unless a house is on fire, and even then think twice). See #4.

2). Complaining for women is often a veiled form of bragging. For example, complaining about the b/f lets you know she’s no spinster. I know a woman who would go on and on about how difficult it was to have a sunroom, letting everyone know (without really saying) she lived in an expensive house. Women also do this with alleged “harassment,” which is a way to really let you know how desirable men find them wile pretending the whole time how “awful” they find all that attention.

3). If you’re thinking she’ll cheat with you, find out if she’s already cheated. A lot of times cheating for women is about creating a dramatic soap opera. If so, she may be open to you.

4). If the above holds true, just amplify: “Wow, so you must have felt bad then!” “Gee, that’s horrible!” You’ll build emotional intimacy that way. If you find it heading in this direction, introduce alcohol at some point for an easier entryway out of the friend zone. Be careful of a harassment charge — might be better to do this if one of you quits.

5). She is not g/f material. Trust me, I tried. Drama queens are great because they usually do insane things in bed (mine was very anally-oriented), but they are not good to deal with day to day. Sex buddy is a good plan.

I forgot to mention something. If you do plan on getting in her pants, you may want to find out if she dates “troubled” guys (I’m willing to bet money she does). If so, find a subtle way of inventing some drama in yours.

Pretend to be in a bad mood one day and if she asks why, mention a probation officer and how you “wanted to put that part of your life behind you” (women love men who allegedly “change”). Or casually mention finally standing up to your abusive father. But don’t think you can brag about any accomplishment ever, because that will just say to her “boring, stable guy.” Or she’ll be threatened and hate you (her veiled bragging is a sign of insecurity, BTW). Anyway, there are women you need to lie to about how you DIDN’T go to college, but DID go to jail. It’s become a topsy-turvy world, but that’s the way it is and we have to deal with it.

You did really well with your bet: Her BF is the “troubled guy” par excellence. He had some kind of fucked up upbringing, former drug dealer, used to get into fights, and there are holes in the wall from their old place where he punched the wall. She says he’s bipolar. I guess he’s more alpha than me from this alone, aside from the dead end, minimum wage job that eats his soul.

Anyway, there was once an opportunity for me, in my pre-pill days, but that opportunity is gone now, and I don’t even want her sexually now anyway. But thanks for your insight., just in terms of knowing what exactly I did wrong when I did have the opportunity. I’m very glad I didn’t though, in hindsight.

But the main lesson I’ve learned from all of this: I need to call women out on their shit more.

This is a pick-up blog, not a religious conservative one. My advice is designed to get him into bed with her, because from experience, these women are hot in bed, as I clearly state above. “Crazy in the head = crazy in the bed.”

The question is why are you talking to a chick that you don’t intend to fuck.
If she’s a coworker that you don’t wanna fuck, keep it professional and don’t talk about your dad.
If you want to fuck her, then you might have to change your strategy cause it doesn’t seem to work.
If you’re already fucking her, then you can disregard this post.

Don’t befriend women who don’t suit your sexual tastes, and even if you do, focus on gina tingles to stroke your ego and hone your game instead of talking about your dad.

Otherwise, it’s asking for boring drama. Women love that kind of drama because they’re women… and boring.
Don’t be an emotional tampon.

There was some time in my pre-pill days where she was leading me on while still with her boyfriend, and I genuinely thought something was going to come out of it. I killed all the feelings I had for her, and she does do favors at work for me. Yeah, I’m trying to avoid being an emotional tampon, starting to call her out on her shit.

“Don’t befriend women who don’t suit your sexual tastes, and even if you do, focus on gina tingles to stroke your ego and hone your game instead of talking about your dad.”

That’s the plan. I guess part of me thought she genuinely wants to be friends..silly me.

She sounds like a good practice-dummy against which you can refine your psychological slight of hand, even if, as you say, you “don’t even want her sexually now.” (Has she become fat, like certain depressives tend to?)

You brought her to our attention for a reason. You were already aware of the female trait that contrives drama for ego gratification. It is not exclusive to depressives, it is only more apparent in them.

Keep a string tied to her. She (or you) can call it “friendship” if that makes her feel better. You can learn a great deal about women in general from interacting with an exemplar like her, and no second-hand advice from us can equal first-hand experience with you. All of the little manipulations the above commenters advise are useful in that they will make you more familiar with button-pushing. It is good to witness cause and effect.

You will be able to elicit a kind of stunning vulnerability in her, and the look it produces can only be described as, “How in the world did you know that?” Simultaneously disarming, terrifying, and tingling. It’s what her “bad boy” fuck-pal accidentally draws out of her by relating to the core of her experience. Kind of like how gays, drunks, and addicts can recognize each other in a glance. They are kismet because they are refugees from the same kind of disaster.

Bipolarism is resident in every young woman, dormant to greater and lesser degrees. Our culture insisted on planting and developing the seed of depression in our girls in exchange for their “liberation.” Women like your subject patient simply have their short-circuitry amped-up to visible melting and smoking levels. The bipolarism of today’s typical mutilated girl is a matter of degree not kind.

Yes, this “modern, Western, feminist, entitled careerist woman” is Sophie Mirabella, a noted right-winger and anti-feminist, married to a military man. She’s also an ethnic Greek, which in my book means she is not “Western.”

[heartiste: you don’t think conservative women can be shaped by an overarching feminist culture? a conservative careerist woman and a liberal careerist woman have a lot more in common than a careerist woman and a stay-at-home mom of whichever political persuasion.]

Western civilisation is to a largely an outgrowth of ancient Greece, dude. Why do think Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, and so forth are so highly regarded here? Democracy and the major and minor scales which define Western music came from Greece. The hippocratic oath that Western doctors take is Greek. Western Civilisation is up to its eyeballs in Greek.

True enough… but ethnically-speaking, the Greeks of Homer and the Acropolis were of quite a different mettle than today’s mixed multitude which inhabit the Aegean. Their gods had golden hair and blue-grey eyes, in their own image.

That would make sense. Today’s population is clearly less Neanderthal. When did the shift occur, the Macedonian invasion or later? Or perhaps slave importation from the golden age precipitated fatal miscegenation.

“It’s a peculiar time when men rush to help another man out while women dawdle uselessly”

This is a silly point. In traditional societies women are generally expected to dawdle uselessly or panic in a crisis while men take charge. Sophie is just making the point, unintentionally to be sure, that women do not belong in positions of power.

What we need are RATIONAL and EMPATHETIC leaders who are good at playing the multiple, simultaneous games of three-dimensional chess that modern politics has become. It’s a tall order for any human to be both.

I personally don’t care what gender of skull contains that brain. You mentioned Hillary. She’s a wickedly capable individual, and probably would’ve made a really effective president (regardless of your views of her policies).

As far as societies where women are making all the important decisions … well, that’s never happened, so the jury is out. But it’s an irrelevant debate anyways.

The idea that it doesn’t matter “what gender of skull contains that brain” is cryptofeminism too stubborn to be eradicated by the regular means of enlightenment. Even people who are presumably aware enough to be reading this blog persist in the nostrums artificially inseminated into them in elementary school.

Women are not men. Men are not women. The distinction is present in the chromosome in every nucleus in every cell of the body.

There will never be a female president. The worm has turned on that. Hillary was their penultimate chance, and Palin was the spectacular coup de grâce that will bury the idea until the nineteenth amendment is repealed.

A leader who is entrusted with important decisions needs to be Rational only. When said leader is being elected it’s good to appear Emphatic – kissing babies etc – too.

My father is an Alpha and has a great understanding of women. When I was 14 yo and my brother was 12 yo, he called us into the sitting room one Saturday afternoon and told us he has some important stuff to discuss with us. He asked my mother to bring us refreshments in an hour. When my mother came into the room later, she saw my father had spread out financial statements and bank balances on the coffee table and was discussion a $100,000 investment he was about to make with the two of us. He knew we were smart chaps and wished to get a second opinion. After my mother had left off the sandwiches and tea, she stood listening for a few minutes till my father asked her to leave. Now my mother left, but wasn’t too pleased about not being consulted on a $100,000 investment, or even knowing about it at all. She later complained to me – her favorite – about this. I was a little confused why this was so then, but by the time I was 16 yo I realized why. My father was a serial entrepreneur, and coming up with ideas and calculating opportunity costs and making complex decisions was what motivated him. My mother, though very smart for a female, and good with numbers, never understood taking risks, never understood investments strategies. When my father was successful she would chalk it up to luck, when a venture failed she would chide him on taking risks. So her advice was useless, and less valuable than even my 12 yo brother’s advice.

What do you notice about this picture of Hilary Clinton at the time of the assassination of Osama bin Laden:

She has a markedly different gesture than the other men seated. Her hand is covering my mouth, people do this when they are lying or trying to hide the truth from someone. What her gesture says loud and clear is that she absolutely would NOT have pulled the trigger on bin Laden had she been in charge.

That photo alone is worth a 1,000 or even 10,000 word essay of why women can’t be in charge – EMPATHY.

“Social skills are rendered in the form of neural connections. These take up space in the brain, space that could be better used boosting ones’ IQ score. Therefore, the more of your brain you have dedicated to being smart, the less you have dedicated to being human. Simple.”

Being smart is not having a particular neural connections but having a brain capable of quickly reshaphing those connections. Stupid men are stuck to being naturals or not. Smart men can learn game conceps and getting a feel of them by practicing.

Naaah, there are certain forms of intelligence (the math-and-science) kind that don’t lend themselves to social skills. In extreme form you see this with all the Aspergery types like Newton and Einstein; in less extreme form you rarely see the guys from Accounting being the best dancers.

Of course, given the importance of these fields to human advancement (cars, computers, medicine), you could make a case this is another side effect of feminism: if women have more economic power, they don’t have to marry nerds, which means they don’t get to reproduce, which means technical ability will decline over time and the human race will gradually get more r-selected.

Yes, Einstein got pussy. But he did show some Aspergery traits. A late talker. Odd dress sense. Very cold towards his family. Never listened to critics as he should have.

Einstein’s success with women – of whom he had a low opinion I understand – probably owed a lot to his extreme fame. That said, a certain level of autistic coldness could be attractive to women. “Aloof game”.

I have to say I think you are being unfair to Sophie Mirabella. As Australian political females go, she is not too bad. If you want to hate on someone, there are more obnoxious women in the more left wing Labor Party.

The guy who collapsed works for ActUp, if I recall correctly, a somewhat freaky activist group, and Sophie M may well have thought he was pulling a stunt.

This is ridiculous…. as a couple of aussies have tried to point out, none of you have any idea what you’re talking about.

Sophie Mirabella (the woman who sat there doing nothing) is in no way shape or form a feminist or a ‘lefty’. She’s on the far right of our Conservative Party (amusingly enough called the Liberal party).
It’s as though you’ve just gone out and started laughing at what a “fag loving hippy” Rick Santorum is. Hell, I can’t possibly put into words just how absurd this is.

Excuse me but Rick Santorum is a white knighter who kisses the asses of right wing anti-sex feminists all the time and he is no friend of the heterosexual male. As a super beta, he married Karen after an alpha abortion doctor twice her age finally let her go when she turned 30. She would never have turned conservative if the former liberal boyfriend hadn’t dumped her. Rick resents alphas for having had first dibs on his own wife and he wants to regulate these other men now as being less noble than he is. Luckily he quit the race.

Margaret Thatcher wanted to give the British feminists everything they wanted, almost, and it was only the fact that her male aides threatened to quit enmasse that stopped her.

In California, regarding the 41 year old James Hooker dude who’s moved in with the 18 year old former student, a female bitch Republican (conservative) legislator is now pushing through legislation that would make his actions a felony, putting alphas of the future in jail.

So, hearing that this Aussie MP is “far right”, one can assume she could easily be a man-hater who wants new Australian laws, such as making marriage more of a poison pill institution (if you marry her, we will make your life hell if you cheat on her or abandon her). She could easily be the type that wants men arrested for speaking with a police decoy prostitute.

So, unless an Aussie here can show that this MP recognizes men’s rights and is generally pro-male, the post seems appropriate.

In short, nobody who has read the manosphere for more than a day would assume that only left wing politicians are man haters.

Well she’s on the record in Parliament deriding the Prime Minister as a man hater. Married to a military man. She’s still a major party politician of course and Australia has tight party discipline.

But anyway, I wouldn’t piss on Simon Sheik if he was on fire. This is a guy who’s made a career out of pushing global warming, promoting faggoty, and standing up for illegal immigrants by attacking Australia’s border protection policies.

The more i read your posts Heartiste, the more i’m beginning to believe that females do not have any true compassion or a loving bone in their body when it comes to Men. Anything close to it (if you’ve managed to successfully game her to loving you) is all a mirage.
It’s her over bloated Ego for validation and challenge to win you over, by acting as accomodating as possible in order to soften and eventually blow a man out of the water.
Women simply see relationships/marriages as transactions and has nothing to do with their feelings for you. They would rather indulge in it with ice-cream, chocolate and an over-abundance of male attention in social networking sites.
Not that i can complain. There has never been a better time in history, in a world of female hypergamy, entitlement and ‘girl-power’ to be a complete jack-ass/player/gamer and feel no guilt towards it.

[heartiste: men and women are vile in their own ways, but women’s vileness is ignored, papered over, or rationalized by all right-thinking and good-feeling people. this blog aims to correct that misperception and bring balance to the force.]

Love exists and most of us are capable of it. However unconditional love, except in terms of a sense of duty, doesn’t exist. Every child will eventually become despised by the very parents who beamed with joy at its birth if that child becomes a burden on them. For love to exist in the state we dream of, then it is conditional on selfish needs being met.

Wow. That woman lives down the road from my parents, I kid you not. She is no fan of feminism, but has gotten to where she is due to inroads made in the name of equality . She’s an unimpressive unappealing Federal politician.

All I see in the video is a moment of visceral revulsion, then blank incomprehension that leads to a total inability to comprehend the situation an act accordingly in order to help your fellow human.

She was more of a power-suit-and-red-lipstick kinda image, not a semi claw haircut and leather jacket kinda image.. I’m out of touch.

Serioulsy, though, you should see the slip of Bob Beckel faking an on-air heart attack. He was doing it to make some dark humor, but the reaction of Dana Perino is decidedly different than this woman. It’s actually fairly moving. She looks to maintain professionalism, but can’t stifle her concern for someone (even, gasp, someone across the political aisle) in apparent distress.

I don’t understand why the people posting on this blog constantly insist on bashing womens’ appearances in random pictures like the one featured in this post. No, she’s not particularly attractive. But does it really matter? What purpose does it serve, bashing some woman you’ll probably never meet? If you eyes are sooo offended, why don’t you head over to that barely legal porn site you love so much and look at the 18-year-old Eastern European babes?

The sad thing is, instead of providing a REAL thought-out answer, the first person to respond will probably accuse me of having my panties in a bunch because I’m supposedly fat and ugly.

I can’t accept the fact that the figure that look male in every aspect is a woman. WTF are those people in your country? Never saw similar in here. |Even the borad shoulders, the face, the nose, and the hair. In fact “she” look a bit like Robin Williams in that movie “Mrs. Doubtfire”. No, I take that back, I just saw a poster while searching for the movie title and he looks way more feminine than this image.