> On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Martin J. Bligh wrote:>> 1. Time>> 2. It'd make the patches much bigger and harder to read.> > Hmm.. I'd actually rather have the code split up in the proper location,> even if it would mean that summit support wouldn't work (or even> necessarily compile) by the feature-freeze.

OK. Having looked at this, it actuallly looks easy enough, andcleaner if I can just stick to the Summit stuff for now. Thepatches will actually be smaller, and the only disadvantage seemsto be that I'll end up with less hair ;-)

Below is a brief proof-of-concept I did, please cluebat me now if this isn't the type of thing you want before I burn hours and blood pressure fixing up the rest of it.

Consider me "re-aligned" ;-)

M.

PS. This distros want Summit to autodetect for their install kernels,which is what the x86_summit switch is for.