I took the National Football Draft Scout (NFLDS) top 150, which is sort of the go-to source for draft stuff, and averaged their rankings with the top 150 by overall draft grade from National Football Post (Wes Bunting) and Pro Football Weekly (Nolan Nawrocki). Then I pulled the top 100 players, or roughly the first three rounds. No fancy formatting here, sorry. It's informative (to me at least) to see where all 3 agree... and where they diverge. Sometimes 2 of the 3 are almost identical, and then the third drops a guy, and makes me wonder what he's seeing differently. E.g., Michigan St. DT Jerel Worthy is being mocked as a 1(b)-1(c) player, with an NFLDS ranking of 27 and a PFW ranking of 29. But NFP comes in at 60. Why? Then you have Stanford OT Jonathan Martin, who I think is just OK, and in most mocks he's a solid 1(b) pick, going in the teens. But the opinions here have him 23 (NFLDS), 61 (NFP), and 119 (PFW), for a composite 59th overall, which IMO is closer to his true value (looks better working next to DeCastro). Underclassmen noted with asterisk.