Featured Post

Trading away the dance-pop trifles of their hits for a faceless stylistic shuffle, the duo seems to be tiring of itself, too. We’re going to be stuck with the Chainsmokers forever. Though the unctuous duo of Drew Taggart and Alex Pall are probably not destined for decades of unqualified success, their insipid spin on EDM’s big-money boom has become as much an eye-rollingly omnipresent part of our national fabric as “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Most living humans in the Western world have likely had the unfortunate sensation of having a Chainsmokers hit stuck in their head, as gross as gum on a hot bus seat; after all, their Coldplay collaboration, “Something Just Like This,” seems made only to ooze from department-store speakers for eternity. There’s even a goddamn feature-length film based on the M83-aping “Paris” in development. Like so many modern American atrocities, the Chainsmokers are just something we’re going to have to endure.

Flipboard

Samsung 960 Evo 1TB Review

The Samsung 960 Evo is an NVMe SSD that comes in a M.2 form factor and provides blisteringly fast sequential read/write speeds at a more affordable consumer price over its Pro counterpart. Read on to find out how fast the 960 Evo really is.

Should I Buy The Samsung 960 Evo?

The Samsung 960 Evo M.2 provides ridiculously fast sequential read/write speeds, but is a little slower than the 960 Pro. However, it still offers extreme performance over a regular SATA III SSD and is more affordable than its Pro counterpart - making the 960 Evo a fantastic SSD for the pro-consumer.

Price When Reviewed

$119.99 (250GB), $229.99 (500GB), $449.99 (1TB)

This miniscule SSD comes in an M.2 form factor and uses NMVe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) technology - but don't let its size fool you, the Samsung 960 Evo packs a serious sequential read/write punch. Read on to see how the 960 Evo compares to SATA III-based SSDs and its brother, the 960 Pro. Also see: Samsung 960 Pro 512GB review.

NVMe SSDs are still new to the market and their adoption rate has been relatively slow, mainly due to motherboard chipsets very slowly adopting the extreme speeds capable from a storage device.

Despite its high price tag, the 960 Evo 1TB only comes with a three-year warranty and guarantees 200 TBW (terabytes written). The 960 Pro on the other hand, offers 400 TBW and a five-year warranty.

When connected to our Windows 10 test rig, the 960 Evo displayed 931GB of usable storage. This results in a high £0.43 per GB which is double the cost of regular SATA III SSDs, but is considerably cheaper than the £0.65 per GB 960 Pro.

Prices change on a daily basis, but these were correct at the time of each review:

NVMe technology has been around for some time, but it has taken time for consumers and most importantly board manufacturers to take it on seriously - in our case, our motherboard didn't feature an M.2 slot, meaning we had to get an adaptor for around £30 to test the SSD. (Note: make sure it's an NVMe adaptor, connects through PCIe and has an M.2 connector.)

The M.2 form factor is miniscule, at only 22.15x80.15x2.38mm, it definitely isn't a storage device you would associate with blistering fast speeds.

The 960 Evo uses Samsung's very own V-NAND technology and utilises a 2-bit MLC (multi-level cell) NAND to store data. The V-NAND technology found within the 960 Evo is the same technology which proved extremely popular on their SATA III SSDs (such as the 850 Evo).

We should mention that the 960 Evo 1TB features a Low Power DDR3 1TB Memory Cache. This gives it lots of headroom when transferring large files to and from the drive.

The 960 Evo, like the 960 Pro features AES 256-bit and TCG Opal 2.0 hardware encryption to protect your data from hackers - you'll have to enable this through software and through a UEFI-enabled BIOS. Samsung's magician software is free to download and also ideal for firmware updates.

If you're buying this SSD for a laptop, the 960 Evo consumes 5.7W when active and 0.4W when idle.

Benchmark Performance

We tested the 960 Evo using CrystalDiskMark and AS SSD benchmark, where just like the 960 Pro found interesting results, notably with AS SSD benchmark - where the 960 Evo under performed versus its SATA III counterparts.

Through CrystalDiskMark, the 960 Evo provides ridiculously fast sequential speeds with reads of 1717.8 MB/s and writes of 1729.8 MB/s. This does make it slower than the 960 Pro that hits 2048.8/1822.7 MB/s respectively.

However its 4Kb performance is below-average, with only 32.8 MB/s read and 50.2 MB/s write speeds, the 960 Evo even falls short of SATA III drives!

On the plus side, the 960 Evo offers ridiculously fast speeds in all of its sequential benchmarks, making SATA III drives look sluggish in comparison. The difference is further emphasised when compared to a traditional HDD, such as the 7200 RPM Seagate hard drive in our comparison.

Using the PCIe lane speeds found on motherboards, the 960 Evo is able to shine and will provide you fantastic read/write speeds if you're transferring large files back and forth.

As aforementioned, AS SSD benchmark was unable to correctly pick up the speeds of the 960 Evo, the same applied to the 960 Pro, where speeds were throttled by the benchmarking tool.

The 960 Evo is very much like its brother, the 960 Pro - it provides ridiculously fast speeds, but unlike the Pro is more affordable, making it a better buy for most consumers.

Granted, if you're extremely serious and worried about its 4Kb read/write speeds, then the Pro might be the better purchase - especially given the better warranty and TBW data guarantee provided on the Pro drive.

If you're looking for a drive that's ridiculously fast, then the 960 Evo is still our recommendation. Of course cost does come into the equation and it's more expensive than conventional SATA III drives out in the market today - but that's the price you're going to have to pay if you want those premium speeds.

If you're not too fussed about speeds, then we would recommend holding off the purchase of NVMe drives in general - at least until they drop in price, just like SATA III SSDs did in the last eight years.

Let us know in the comments below if you feel NVMe is worth the investment or if you'll be holding out for prices to drop!

Popular posts from this blog

Apple’s latest iPad Pros are a very tempting purchase, but should you stick with the tried-and-tested Surface Pro from Microsoft? We help you decide which tablet to buy. Should I Buy The Microsoft Surface Pro 6 Or Apple iPad Pro 11in (2018)?Two very competent 2-in-1s, one running Windows 10, the other iOS 12. For many this difference alone will inform the final choice, but both are top-notch tablets.

You probably know Synology for making NAS drives but the firm has also turned its hand to mesh networks. Here we review the MR2200ac. Should I Buy The Synology Mesh Router MR2200ac?Synology could do a little more to explain the many features of the MR2200ac for first-time users, but the strong performance of this mesh system, and the fine-control provided by its web browser interface make it a good option for business users or home users who have a little more experience of networking technology.

Huawei has updated its budget Android phone for 2019. It’s faster and better than before, but should you buy it? Read our review to find out. Should I Buy The Huawei P Smart 2019?The P Smart 2019 is a great upgrade from the 2018 model with a bigger screen and better performance. However, as with the original P Smart, Honor's version is better value.

Though similar to the OnePlus 6T the Oppo RX17 Pro is very different thanks to the software. Here’s our full review Should I Buy The Oppo RX17 Pro?The RX17 Pro is a great looking phone with good performance and a lush display. But with a Snapdragon 710 rather than the better 845 it’s just impossible not to compare it to the OnePlus 6T which looks the same, has better software for the western market and, importantly, costs less.If you like the look of Oppo’s interface though then there’s a lot to like. The two colour options are premium as is the build quality and the cameras are above average if not great.

We've waited two years for the Nokia 9, and at the end of this month the company could finally put us out of our misery. Here's what we know about the Nokia 9 PureView, which could feature a penta-lens rear camera. Nokia made its comeback to the Android market in January 2017 with the Nokia 6, and we've been waiting two years now for its long-rumoured flagship Nokia 9 to arrive. At MWC 2018 we thought that time was here, and then we got the the Nokia 8 Sirocco. But now the wait could really, really be over, as the Nokia 9 is tipped to land before the end of January 2019.