iPhone 7 Plus again tipped to come with a dual-camera setup Comments

Emir Zarith, 28 Jan 2016I'm just suprised why Google paid to have their apps on iPhone. If Google pulled out their app... moreBusinesses run on mutual benefit my friend. Not by killing each other. This is why samsung provide hardware parts for iphone. And microsoft have office for mac and ios.

I'm just suprised why Google paid to have their apps on iPhone. If Google pulled out their apps from the iPhone, I'm sure the iPhone would become irrelevant just like windows mobile and blackberry despite having a great hardware. It should have been the other way round. iPhone needs Google more than Google needs iPhone

Stan, 27 Jan 2016HTC did a dual camera setup for depth of field control. Everyone was hoping the second camera ... moreG5 already tipped to have dual camera setup and apple is not the first now.....you have been waiting so long ?? If you are about to blame android OEMs u have to do the same to apple......because apple also have not implemented this......you iCrap fanboy....

Apple moto is wait till someone perfects the technology or till you can actually use the technology then put it in an apple product and claim it's new.

Samsung made the first (sch-B710) in 2007 followed by LG, HTC and sharp in 2011

Almost everyone the thinks apple invented the finger print reader on phones but that's a lie the bought a company called AuthenTec for it and even before the smartphones there were phones with a fingerprint reader(Philips, Pantech, Sagem and Toshiba).

My advice is when apple claims they have something that has never been done by anyone or the have something thing new check if it's true. I don't hate apple products I have used an iPhone 5 for 2 years and still have my iPad mini. What I hate is the false claims and the apple cult that believes everything apple tell them

raonaveen, 27 Jan 2016I agree Apple takes ideas from others. But they dont always take popular, trending ,money maki... moreI know your point.but you've lost the most important element. Motorola dropped fingerprint sensor, HTC dropped dual camera back in evo 3D because time and technology was not right for that features.it was too soon. apple is just picking up others idea with no respect and shame at all and they patent it, Because they are indeed clueless about a meaning of "Innovation" word and they will act in front of the world bla bla bla...you know the rest. Apple is nothing now.they just desperately walking around old streets and picking up cigarette butts of others.they are vanished long ago!

Bars, 27 Jan 2016wow man!
You REALLY think apple is going to put a second camera for you to take a photo with ... moreI REALLY want a second camera with a mid-telephoto lens, It would be perfect if they made it 85mm equivalent. Then you've got a landscape and a portrait lens. It would be a great walkaround for cases when I cannot carry my DSLR. What i'd really love to have is a 1" sensor in a phone. Heck, even 1/1.5" would do. Sony's 1-inchers today are 5-year old DSLR level performers. Give me a Sony's 24mp 1" sensor with a good and fast enough prime on top of it, and I can do without a mid-telephoto lens in a smartphone.
Problem is, the last large sensor phone was Nokia Pureview 808, and all dual camera phones have 2nd camera for DOF simulation and 3d special effects. DOF simulation on such a small sensor is bad anyways, so it's a gimmic as far as i'm concerned.

I agree Apple takes ideas from others. But they dont always take popular, trending ,money making ideas and feed on them. They just take ideas and implement them perfectly. Finger print sensor is popularised by Apple. It was first used in motorola i know but then why did'nt motorola used that in all their future phones. They just dropped it. Same in case of Htc dual camera setup. They used it once then failed and then dropped the idea in all of their future phones. This is the difference in copying and taking ideas. Copying the popular feature which is making money and then feeding on it is wrong. But if someone tried something and then dropped the idea for 2 years and now someone else wants to do that is not wrong. This goes for every brand.