Why The Heck Did We Invest In Skybox Imaging, A Satellite Startup?

This is about as far from your typical TechCrunch-covered startup as you can get. It’s not a quirky new online business model or social application that may or may not take off. They’re building real satellites and they’re getting ready to launch them into space.

Why do we like Skybox so much?

Because they’re building a desperately needed imaging platform for a new generation of business and other applications. To put a satellite into space costs hundreds of millions of dollars today. And just one satellite in a network isn’t all that interesting. GPS, for example, uses more than 30 satellites.

To create a useful network of imaging satellites for near real time applications you need dozens of satellites in orbit and sharing information. That’s cost prohibitive for all but the most powerful world governments.

Unless you find a way to get an orders of magnitude decrease in cost.

If a company was able to do that, and put a satellite into space at a small fraction of the current cost, they’d likely be able to lock down a number of high profile customers for a variety of previously cost-prohibitive applications. Confidentiality agreements and U.S. export regulations might prohibit that company from disclosing much, or any, of that information.

But investors would obviously have access to that information. You can draw your own conclusions as to why the company is hiring big data engineers in droves, and why Canaan Partners, Norwest Venture Partners, Khosla Ventures, Bessemer Venture Partners and CrunchFund might want to put some $90+ million into that startup.

Certainly reads like there is more here than is being written. It reminds me of Don Valentine’s View From The Top speech at Stanford about their strategy when they invested in Apple and how that prompted investments in semiconductors and several other companies because one could not exist without the other. This seems like a similar situation.

The best part of your vagueness is that now all possibilities are open to interpretation. Not even going to say what excites me because then someone on here would just tell me its not possible anyway! haha

This is the first I read about Skybox, but they talk about ‘microsatellites’. I can imagine something similar to the videos I’ve seen where weather balloons are used to bring iPads and similar to very high altitudes; where if you radically reduce the weight of your ‘satellite’, down to less than a kg, and you don’t need to use the same satellite for years, you can use radically different launch methods.

The Synergy between location services and its value to advertising has not been fully tapped hence investing funds in semi mature market segment that is connected to current cash cow (advertising) can never be a bad idea

Feb 12 2013 – Skybox Imaging Accelerates Constellation Deployment, seehttp://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/skybox-imaging-accelerates-constellation-deployment-150000147.html
–
Skybox Imaging (Skybox), an emerging provider of timely satellite imagery and data services, today announced it is adding an imaging satellite, SkySat-2, to its fleet during 2013 via a newly available secondary launch opportunity aboard a Soyuz-Fregat. Skybox has secured this launch opportunity by contracting with JSC Glavkosmos, a secondary payload launch provider within the Russian Federal Space Program that works on behalf of the Russian Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos).
The satellite will launch alongside the Meteor-M weather satellite from the Baikonur space center in Kazakhstan. It will be a copy of Skybox’s first satellite, SkySat-1, planned for launch in 2013 aboard a Dnepr launch vehicle.