Radmilla's Voice: Music Genre, Blood Quantum, and Belonging on the Navajo Nation

by Kristina Jacobsen-Bia

Window Rock, Navajo Nation, Arizona, September 1997. A young woman butchers a sheep as the crowd at the Navajo Nation Fairgrounds watches. Her hair tied back in a tsiiyéél, a woman’s hair bun, she wears a velvet top, silver concho belt, long satin skirt, and leather moccasins—the markers of traditional Navajo femininity. As she expertly slits the sheep’s throat to begin the arduous process of dissecting the animal, her skirt remains spotless: Not a drop of blood touches it.

Sheep butchering, a traditional Navajo art of subsistence, constitutes the first part of the Navajo Nation’s annual Miss Navajo pageant. The second is singing, and the same young woman—Radmilla Cody—performs a traditional “skip dance” song in the Navajo language. But something makes her performance different. As Radmilla’s voice carries across the fairground, she adds melismas, or vocal flourishes, note glides, and a bluesy inflection to the more nasal sound of traditional skip dance songs, which are typically sung by men (McAllester 1954). Onlookers cock their heads to listen more closely, and they hear for the first time the singer who will become known as the “Navajo Whitney Houston.”1 The crowd responds ecstatically; Radmilla, a twenty-one-year-old from Grand Falls, Navajo Nation, is publicly crowned the forty-sixth Miss Navajo Nation, 1997–1998.

When I introduced myself in Navajo to Radmilla in 2011 at a CD signing (for I had long been a fan of her music), she seemed amused to hear an Anglo, a bilagáana,2 speaking her language. She joked that we try performing some skip dance songs together in a perhaps improbable duo—a white woman and she, a half-black, half-Navajo one, performing old Navajo standards. As she autographed a glossy poster for my friend’s nine-year-old niece, who is of mixed Navajo, Korean, and French descent, she wrote in flowing cursive: “Beautiful you are! Many blessings to you. Always remember that, and walk in beauty.”

Radmilla dramatically broke the mold in more ways than one. There was, most obviously, her distinctive, hybrid singing at the intersection of Navajo tradition and African American rhythm and blues; that style reflected Radmilla’s own mixed heritage: she was the child of a Navajo (Tł’ááshchí’í clan)3 mother and a Naakai Łizhinii, or African American, father. In the documentary Hearing Radmilla (2010), she recalled being singled out as a child living on the Navajo reservation for her African American appearance, being perceived as different from other Navajos. There was also the later denouement to Radmilla’s story, her arrest in 2003 for aiding an abusive, drug-selling boyfriend and her subsequent attempt to rehabilitate her public image as a good citizen of the Navajo tribe. Fully fluent in Navajo and a citizen of the Navajo Nation, she embodied a unique story, and Radmilla’s voice became a lightning rod for reflection and debate about the twenty-first-century politics of race,4 blood, music genre, and belonging in Navajo country.

What, then, does Radmilla’s story reveal about the relationship between sound, racial identity, and blood quantum on the Navajo Nation? And what, in particular, can be said about the role of the singing voice in the politics of indigeneity? In this article, I use two case studies to show the tensions still surrounding black-Native parentage in Native American communities such as the Navajo (or Diné)5 and analyze reactions to Radmilla’s voice as a partial reflection of larger racial stereotypes about blackness and criminality that permeate U.S. society. These ideas tie crucially into issues of tribal citizenship in Native North America in the era of casinos, where the affective and political stakes of belonging have been dramatically raised, and citizenship and enrollment have come to signify more rigid demarcations between who belongs and who does not. Second, I demonstrate how sound itself becomes an “ethnic trope,” defined as symbols constructed as “allusions toward an ideal that has no living model” (Fast 2002, 23), where voice, musical genre, phenotype, and heritage-language skills index a speaker as more or less “authentically” Diné. Here, I distinguish sound from music, defining sound as a broader framework encompassing both music and language, which allows me to talk about the singing and speaking voice within a single frame. In Radmilla’s case, the supposedly black dimensions of both her phenotype and her traditional singing were used to single her out as less than fully Navajo. And, both in her crowning and in her run-in with the law, Radmilla’s identity as a celebrity gained what Daphne Patai (qtd. in Starn 2011, 123) has called “surplus visibility” about racial matters, “always put on the spot when controversy arises.”

Using my own fieldwork singing and playing with the Navajo country-western group, Native Country Band, as a counterpoint to Radmilla’s experience, I examine how individual and collective voices become marked by racial identities. On the one hand, her voice, perceived racial identity, and idiosyncratic singing style designated Radmilla as a cultural outsider. At the same time, in other contexts and because of her ability to broker generational differences in her choice of recorded material, her voice was celebrated as being quintessentially Navajo, securing her insider status as a Diné citizen. Bringing sound into conversations about blood, belonging, and indigeneity, I show how racial identities become marked and investigate the role played by voice in this marking. Music and language both reflect and reinforce ideas of inclusion, exclusion, and communal reckoning in contemporary Navajo communities and in U.S. society at large (Harkness 2010; Feld et al. 2004). My larger contention becomes, in the case of Radmilla, the Navajo Nation, and the U.S. nation, that aesthetics—and voice and sound in particular—matter in relation to politics, albeit often in divergent ways and on differing scales.

* * *

There are four Navajo reservations, and the largest one spans parts of Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah. The three satellite reservations of Tohajilee’,6 Ramah, and Alamo, all located in central New Mexico, have their unique histories, dialects, and identities as Diné people living apart from the “big rez.” Yet the four reservations together comprise the political entity known as the Navajo Nation, and citizens of each reservation vote in Navajo national elections.

With more than 170,700 self-reported fluent Navajo speakers, the Navajo Nation has the largest number of Native-language speakers (United States Census Bureau 2007) of a single tribe within the continental United States. In the 2010 census, for example, there were 332,000 enrolled Navajos, 83.3 percent of whom self-reported as speaking their heritage language, Navajo or Diné Bizaad (Henson 2008, 283–84). Thus, not all Navajos speak Navajo, and those who identify as Navajo include heritage-language speakers and non-heritage-language speakers. Further, mirroring Radmilla’s own life, not all Diné people live on reservations, and the Navajo Nation is as internally diverse as the U.S. nation that surrounds it: Approximately two-thirds of Navajo residents live on one of four Navajo reservations, while the remaining third live in southwestern urban centers, elsewhere in the United States, or abroad.7

Like all federally recognized tribes, the Navajo Nation is also a sovereign Indian nation, with its own government, judicial system, tribal police force, council delegates, and tribal president.8 The Navajo Nation exercises its sovereignty in myriad ways, for example, by negotiating water rights at the federal, state, and tribal levels; by taxing Navajo citizens (at 4 percent) for retail sales made on the reservations (Associated Press 2012); and by determining its own tribal membership. In fact, although a beauty contest might not seem like a conventional marker of nationhood, the Miss Navajo pageant is also a contemporary expression of Navajo sovereignty, and specifically reflects diplomatic relations between the Navajo Nation, the states with which the Navajo Nation shares overlapping jurisdiction (Arizona, Utah, and New Mexico), and the United States.

Yet the politics of tribal belonging are far from simple. The legal criteria used for contemporary tribal membership conflict, in fact, with other definitions Dine’é used and use to assay Navajo identity and tribal citizenship, and some scholars today (see Dennison 2012) see legal criteria such as blood quantum as a direct affront to tribal sovereignty and the future of indigenous polities.9 Using a Certificate Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB or CIB) card as proof of legal recognition as an Indian is a fairly recent phenomenon in Navajo and Indian Country. Significantly, this shift in the legal definition of Indian disregards historical and community-internal criteria—such as kinship (k’é), maternal clan, and number of years lived in a Navajo community—in determining indigenous belonging and social authenticity.

Radmilla herself comes from Leupp Chapter, in the reservation’s southwest corner on the Arizona side. After finishing her studies at Coconino High School in Flagstaff, an off-reservation border town, Radmilla was encouraged to enter the Miss Navajo contest by her maternal grandmother and her mother (Naylor 2006). Other federally and state recognized U.S. tribes also host similar hybrid beauty-culture pageants, open exclusively to their female citizens, including the Seminole Tribe of Florida, the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina and the White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona. In most cases, these Native pageants began in the 1950s and 1960s (Jenkins 2010; Schröder 2004).10

Unique to these pageants is their dual emphasis on both contemporary and traditional skills (including singing, food preparation, heritage-language abilities, and sheep butchering). Thus, successful contestants must demonstrate their knowledge of the global world around them but must also be deeply grounded in their respective cultural traditions; however, the latter might be defined by the pageant and the host tribe. More specifically, Miss Navajo “must exemplify the essence and characters of the Navajo deities First Woman, White Shell Woman and Changing Woman” (Cartwright n.d.).11 The winner of the Miss Navajo pageant then becomes the official ambassador to the Navajo Tribe for one calendar year. Notably absent from these pageants is the archetypal category of traditional Western beauty competitions, the swimsuit contest.

But the Navajo pageant is by no means entirely different from its counterparts around the globe. Echoing the familiar gender politics of conventional contests, Miss Navajo contestants are expected to be single and “available.” As one Diné critic has noted, “Although Miss Navajo Nation embodies Navajo cultural values associated with ideal womanhood, we must also acknowledge that beauty pageants are rooted in white middle-class values that present femininity as values of chastity, morality, and virtue” (Denetdale 2006, 20). We can observe these values at play in the Miss Navajo pageant itself, which awards its runner-ups trophies for Miss Congeniality and Miss Photogenic (Bitsoi 2011).

Radmilla’s mother, Margaret Cody, met her dad, Troy Davis, and had Radmilla when she was eighteen (Cartwright n.d.). Shortly after giving birth, Margaret moved to Georgia, leaving Radmilla to be raised by her maternal grandmother (her másání), Dorothy, in Grand Falls. Troy was a driver for a Ford dealership in Flagstaff, and had very little contact with his daughter as she grew up (Banks 2011). Radmilla attended Leupp Boarding School, a Bureau of Indian Affairs school on the reservation, and during her elementary school years lived without running water or electricity, two salient indices of rural reservation life. She was taught to herd sheep and weave, the latter an art form predominantly associated with Navajo women. At age seven, she also began attending a Christian church with her grandmother and began singing in the choir there. By junior high, Radmilla had decided she wanted to be a professional singer; she met her uncle, the noted singer and composer Herman Cody, at a Miss Navajo engagement in 1997–1998, and they have been collaborating since then.

Because she was raised in the Navajo way (Dinék’éhjí), it was not until high school that Radmilla became more conscious of her African American identity, learning about Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Jr., and gaining a black political consciousness as it related to her own identity (Gordy 2011). As she frequently notes in interviews, she has since often been asked to choose between these two identities. These larger cultural expectations specifically came to the fore in mandates about what a Miss Navajo should look and sound like, as well as in op-ed pieces in the main Navajo newspaper, the Navajo Times, and in press reviews of the pageant.12 Radmilla has largely responded by refusing these mandates, insisting, like her late maternal grandmother, that k’é, or kinship, determines Navajo belonging and identity.

For example, building on her ability to successfully claim an audience, Radmilla is now on a linguistic mission to eradicate usage of the term zhinii, a form of Navajo slang referring to African Americans and an elided version of the term Naakai Łizhinii (Black Mexicans) from everyday parlance.13 As she explained in Navajo to the elderly women sitting in the audience after a screening of Hearing Radmilla, zhinii is a term that has brought a lot of hurt over the years, always singling her out and making her feel less Navajo and, ultimately, less human. Instead, she is calling for the introduction of the word Nahiłii, a more descriptive and, to her ears, respectful term denoting African American peoples, which translates to “the black ones that came across, persevered and have become one.”14 At the Chinle high school graduation on May 18, 2013, where she was a featured performer, Radmilla refused to self-identify in Navajo using the standard term Naakai Łizhinii, introducing her four clans instead as: Tł’ááshchí’í nishłį́ [I am of the red ochre on cheek people], Nahiłii báshíshchíín [I am born for the African American people], Naakai Dine’é dashicheii [my maternal grandfather’s clan is Mexican] dóó [and] Nahiłii dashinálí [my paternal grandfather’s clan is African American].”

Figure 4. Radmilla Cody and her másání, the late Dorothy Cody, in 2006. (Image from Contreras 2010. Photo by John Running)

BLACK/NATIVE PARENTAGE: K’é and Blood Quantum

Throughout Native North America, Indian-white and Indian-black parentage has been understood in dissimilar and contradictory terms (Brooks 2002; Miles and Holland 2006). While Navajo–African American relations date back to the Spanish colonial period, these relations are today sometimes selectively depicted as a phenomenon of the past fifty years. As scholars of U.S. racial politics and the one-drop rule have shown (Sanjek and Gregory 1994; Starn 2011), whiteness is often depicted as a tabula rasa, while blackness becomes the marked racial category (Gillborn 2009; McIntosh 1990; Omi and Winant 1994; Sullivan 2006, 22). In other words, whiteness in relation to blackness is understood as a mere “absence of pigmentation,” with blackness—and black “blood” in particular—read as that which overdetermines one’s racial identity regardless of one’s total racial mixture (Roediger 2002, 326). Thus, within the logic of the one-drop rule, “it may take one drop of blood to make a black person, but it takes a lot of blood to make an Indian” (Arica Coleman in Schilling 2013, 1).

While Navajo citizenship is determined by a minimum blood quantum of one-quarter Navajo blood and having at least one enrolled parent on the 1940 Bureau of Indian Affairs base roll (Spruhan 2008, 5, 11), sometimes Diné citizens with mixed Navajo-black ancestry are expected to prove their Native identity in ways that so-called full-bloods, and those of Indian-Anglo mixture, are not. Indeed, this held true for Radmilla, as the legitimacy of previous Miss Navajo winners of Indian-Anglo parentage was not questioned to nearly the same extent as was Radmilla’s. Thus, while anthropologists understand race as a social construction and not a given, natural fact, perceptions of race and racial identities profoundly influence the day-to-day lives and sense of belonging for Navajo citizens. As Thomas Biolsi (2005, 400) has noted, “race is a concrete abstraction, and to be black in the United States, for example, is to live on the receiving end of the fiction of ‘race’ in deeply brutalizing ways. And, as scholars have only recently come to recognize, to be white is to inherit racial privilege in profoundly material ways.”

Determining the blood percentage of a given individual, Native or not, is only pseudo-scientific, measured based on ancestry, rather than by a DNA test or actual percentages of Indian blood. In the Navajo context, assessing blood quantum presents an additional challenge because it is determined in part by who is present at a child’s birth to sign the birth certificate. For example, a child’s degree of Indian blood is calculated based on lineal descent but relies on the birth certificate as the starting point to calculate a child’s blood quantum (Begay 2011, 21). This means that if a (Navajo) father is absent at the birth or chooses not to sign the birth certificate for any other reason, the child’s blood quantum will be calculated using only the mother’s Indian blood. Thus, “the child may legitimately be a full-blooded Navajo, but due to the father being absent, the child is considered one-half or less depending on the mother’s blood quantum” (Begay 2011, 22). Additionally, Navajos have long intermarried with non-Navajos, and numerous Navajo clans—a matrilineal kinship system used to determine systems of obligation and reciprocity—are so-called adopted clans. These adopted Navajo clans include the Mexican People Clan (Naakai Dine’é), the Tewa Clan (Naashashí), that is, the Tewa-speaking peoples of New Mexico, the Mescalero Apache Clan (Naashgalí Dine’é), and the Chiricahua Apache Clan (Chíshí Dine’é). About fifty clans continue to be important in contemporary Navajo society (San Juan Heritage 2003), influencing everything from who a person can marry, to who one socializes with or calls “brother” or “sister,”15 to the profession one chooses. Clans and the incorporation of non-Navajos into Navajo society also predate colonial forms of reckoning and belonging, which, importantly, based their criteria on k’e or kinship systems rather than blood quantum. Adopted clans thus are no longer considered separate and are subsumed under the Navajo clan system, losing their separate status as an indicator of an ethnic or racial group.

Further confounding these demarcations, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Navajo Tribe count these adopted clans as Navajo when it comes to issuing CIB or tribal ID cards to Navajo citizens.16 For example, someone with three non-adopted Navajo clans and one adopted clan such as Naakai Dine’é is considered a full-blooded Navajo according to his or her CIB.

But debates about who belongs and who is authentically Navajo are not limited to Diné individuals with a lower blood quantum. Indeed, assessing citizenship, belonging, and policing identity are questions that citizens of many indigenous nations within and beyond the United States grapple with today (Beckett 1988; Dennison 2012; Perdue 2003; Povinelli 2002; Smith 1999; Sturm 2002, 2011).17 In the U.S. context, the stakes of indigenous belonging have been raised particularly in the casino era (1979–present), where tribal citizenship can signal additional benefits such as per capita payments for casino-owning tribes and has caused some tribes to further restrict their enrollment criteria (Painter-Thorne 2010; Debenport 2011).

As a matrilineal society, clans and land in Navajo society are passed down through the mother’s line. Using even the strictest criteria, a child whose first (the mother’s) clan is Diné, as in Radmilla’s case, is Navajo. As Theda Perdue and others have noted for the Cherokee and other matrilineal Native nations, these earlier forms of determining belonging and indigenous citizenship preceded the federal government’s implementation of blood quantum (Perdue 2003; Kauanui 2008). Indeed, in the Cherokee and Navajo contexts, categories of citizenship and belonging were more inclusive and allowed for affiliation based on cultural identity, community connection, and in-depth knowledge of cultural practices. Thus, although blood quantum can be traced to English common law as a method for determining inheritance and “long predates the question of mixed-race ancestry” (Spruhan 2006, 4), its specific legal application in determining legal recognition as an Indian and citizenship in a tribal nation dates only to the early 1900s (Spruhan 2006, 4, 39). Thus, blood quantum and kinship are irreconcilable when used together to assess Navajo identity and belonging for two reasons. First, because blood quantum is based less on one’s actual percentage of ancestral blood and more on what was or was not administratively (and often arbitrarily) recorded (LaRoque 2004; Spruhan 2006; TallBear 2003). Second, blood quantum does not determine how one is or is not socialized—linguistically, culturally and politically—into indigenous identity.

In Radmilla’s case, phenotype, blood quantum, kinship, and culture held a precarious balance, with some commentators arguing that phenotype was more important, while others, like Radmilla herself, arguing that culture trumped phenotype. By claiming her identity as a Diné woman, singer, and a former Miss Navajo, Radmilla shows how voice is a uniquely malleable form of expressive culture. At the same time, voice can become fixed and rigid when categories of race, blood quantum, and expectations about musical genre are superimposed onto it. Radmilla’s singing foregrounds tensions about how voice—the way we hear it, interpellate it, categorize it, project it—can stretch ideas of phenotype and, at the same time, show how vocal tone color, diction, and register can mark and calcify expectations about phenotype.

SOUND AS A MARKER OF AUTHENTICITY

While blackness marks Navajo individuals such as Radmilla, sound, and music genre in particular, can also mark Diné identities. This is something I frequently witnessed during my fieldwork, where I studied the Navajo language and sang and played lap steel guitar with Navajo country-western bands. Even within the narrow confines of country music, the type of country (old or new) that a band such as Native Country Band played often determined our ability to get a gig on the reservation; it also influenced who would come and dance to our music. Most musicians in Navajo country-western bands are male,18 as are most vocalists of traditional Navajo skip dance and round dance songs.19 Since country is the hegemonic genre of popular music on the reservation, especially for those forty and older, branching outside of this musical genre, singing in public, and being a female performer can elicit surprised or shocked responses from older Dine’é in particular. Thus, music genre selection is understood as a performance of a Navajo cultural identity in its own right.

Musical genre also dictates the types of physical spaces, radio stations, and built environments (on the reservation versus off it; chapter house or outdoor parade versus a bar) where one performs, and thus music genre itself is understood as a performance of a Navajo cultural identity. For example, when seeking airtime on a reservation radio station, one highly skilled Navajo blues band, Chucki Begay and the Mother Earth Blues Band, learned from the radio announcer that it “didn’t sound Navajo enough,” and was refused airplay.20

In the case of my main band, Native Country Band, composed of four full-blooded Diné men born and raised on the Navajo reservation, questions of Navajo identity and belonging frequently undergirded casual conversation during band practice, particularly because of my non-Native identity. For example, because the name Native Country Band implies indigenous origins, early on in my fieldwork the bandleader suggested we tell audience members that I was a Lumbee Indian, as I had been living in North Carolina (where the Lumbee Tribe is located) and because, according to the bandleader, some Lumbee Indians “look white.”

At the same time, the drummer for Native Country Band, Miguel, was quick to note that he considered those with a lower blood quantum—he often referenced citizens of tribes “back east”—to be “less Indian,” exemplifying how some Navajo Nation and U.S. citizens put an asymmetrical emphasis on blood versus culture or other markers of identity. Descriptions of Radmilla’s voice also mirror this polarization, couched as a distinction between a black blood essence (“soul”) and a Navajo cultural essence (“spirituality”). Radmilla herself, employing language that reflects the earlier anthropological debate regarding nature versus culture (Ortner 1974), links vocal tone color (timbre) to racial ideologies about voice. Speaking about her own voice, she notes that “the soul comes from the black side” and says that the “spiritual” side of songs springs from her Navajo side (qtd. in Contreras 2010). For the latter she cites her own ability to showcase the beauty and sound of the Navajo language, Diné bizaad. Similarly, her recording label, Canyon Records, in its most recent press release describes her voice as “soaring vocals that deliver both traditional and contemporary sounds with a hint of gospel and soul” (Rodgers 2011).

Such descriptions stem perhaps from how Radmilla collapses a tone color and a singing style indexing soul and rhythm and blues female vocalists—popular genres historically associated with African American singers—with a genre of male-dominated traditional Navajo songs.21 In songs such as “Frybread Song” (Precious Friends, 2007), we can also hear the musical influence of her grandmother’s church choir and traces of a classically trained singing voice.

In her performances of “Kéyah baa Hǫ́zhǫ́” (“My Country ‘Tis of Thee”), “Chidí Nayiiłniih” (“Buy a Vehicle”),22 or the national anthem sung in Navajo,23 we hear how these different styles undergird the expressivity and unique sound quality of Radmilla’s voice. In contrast to more typical performances of social dance songs, Radmilla employs a generous amount of vibrato (the signature sound of many opera singers and also used in slower soul, R & B, and pop ballads) and also glides between notes, as did her childhood musical idols, Whitney Houston and Diana Ross. Further, many social dance songs are typically performed in a nasal, compressed voice, described by some listeners as “a monotone, with almost no flourishes” (Contreras 2010). Radmilla employs less nasality than these male voices, and, as the cultural critic Felix Contreras (2010) notes, “Radmilla projects more and uses techniques like bending notes: common among blues, jazz and pop singers.” In contrast to other Navajo performers singing social dance songs in a traditional vein,24 Radmilla also sings with a breathier style, punctuating the beginnings and endings of phrases with anticipatory in-breaths and slower, more audible exhales and releases. These breathing techniques have become part of the stylistic aesthetic of many R & B singers as well.

At the same time, Radmilla’s style also encompasses some of the most salient markers of the Navajo language. Navajo as a spoken language privileges the manipulation of wind or air (Witherspoon 1977, 30–31) through the correct use of glottal stops (marked as |’| in written Navajo) or, according to Merriam-Webster online, the “audible release of the airstream after complete closure of the glottis,” as heard in the English sounds “uh oh.” We can hear this in particular in her rendition of “Kéyah baa Hǫ́zhǫ́,” where she sings expressively using uniquely Navajo phonetics such as the glottal stop and the alveolar or lateral l.25

A conscious attention to breath and air is also a prominent feature of artful country singing (Fox 2004a). We hear this most prominently in what Urban (1988, 389) calls “icons of crying,” or the simulation of crying within the frame of a song or a lament, where a vocalist “breaks” between her or his head and chest voice. A stylized manipulation of air is also heard in what Aaron Fox terms the “ravaged voice,” a pharyngealized singing style that the lead singer for our band, Tommy Bia, sometimes employed. This held especially true in songs that were affectively charged or, at the end of a long night, when his voice would start to give out from singing in a barroom clouded with cigarette smoke.

Yet many listeners identify Radmilla as a quintessentially Navajo singer precisely because of her singing style and how it reflects the complexity of contemporary Navajo experience. In her ability to reach multiple generations through a wide variety of musical genres and through her performances in English, Navadlish,26 and Navajo, Radmilla’s choice of songs—social dance songs, patriotic songs, rap, and traditional songs composed by her uncle Herman—indexes the breadth of her Navajo and Native identity. Perhaps most important, Radmilla herself consistently identifies first as a Diné woman.

Descriptions of Radmilla’s voice by Canyon Records perpetuate the idea of Navajo cultural continuity while also marking and marketing her voice as “different” or “exceptional.” For example, even though her albums feature songs influenced by Western art music, gospel, country, hip hop, and rap, including the spoken-word performance of “Old School Sheepherder’s Rap” (Precious Friends, 2007), Canyon Records describes the songs on her most recent album (Shí Kéyah or “My Land/Country,” 2011) as “sung in the traditional style of the Diné.” In her bio, the label also speaks of her as a “traditional Navajo recording artist.”27

RACE AND MUSICAL GENRE: Country Music and Whiteness

While black musical styles are sometimes marked in and through Radmilla’s voice, other musical genres remain initially unmarked when performed by Navajo musicians, only to become re-marked when they become identifiably Navajo again. Take country music, what are locally referred to as “rez bands,” and how whiteness and Navajo identity intertwine. In an unsettling moment revealing the impact of internalized racism and settler colonialism (Wolfe 2006) on Navajo senses of self and musical ability, Francine, a driver for the Crownpoint, New Mexico, dialysis clinic, mentioned to me she had heard me singing with Native Country Band on the local radio station. After announcing to those in the waiting room how much she liked my singing in the song “It Wasn’t God Who Made Honky Tonk Angels,” she lowered her voice and said confidentially, “I could tell it wasn’t a Navajo singing.”28 When I asked her to explain, she said she just “knew” the vocalist had to be an Anglo because the voice sounded more professional and I did not sing with a “rez” or Navadlish accent.

What does this ascription mean, and what can we actually learn about racial identity through listening to voices on the radio? Francine was linking her perception of musical skill with sociophonetic ideologies of whiteness and upward mobility. Here, to tell someone they sound “white” is meant as a compliment. For Francine, who knew I was singing with a Navajo band and had been actively listening for us on the radio, my whiteness became correlated with a cultural capital, diction, and singing style that she associated with places beyond Crownpoint and the reservation.

My own role in the bands in which I played also factored into these and similar assessments. As an Anglo female lap steel player and vocalist, I auditioned for each of the bands I played with. Although the members of Native Country Band expressed some hesitation about the research portion of my band membership at the outset, my Anglo identity, my education level, and ability to play an instrument that few musicians on the reservation knew how to ultimately led them to include me as a full band member. In a strange twist, my membership in the band also gave it the cultural capital needed to help us get off-reservation gigs. From a marketing perspective, the contrast between four Navajo men and one Anglo woman in the band, a rarity in Native bands, became an informal branding strategy that marked our band and made our gigs memorable for many fans, even if merely to suggest new band names such as Native Country and Bilagáana Band (Native Country and the White Girl Band). Yet the same things that made me a potential asset also at times made me a liability, particularly in off-reservation musical spaces where fans, bar owners, or managers might have been expecting an all-Native or all-Anglo band and felt invested in policing racial and cultural boundaries in fraught border-town environments. The unexpected (Deloria 2004) element of my membership in the band thus foregrounded not only others’ expectations for our band but also various audience and music-management investments in maintaining these expectations.

But Francine’s comment may also reflect a dominant cultural and musical narrative, something we “tell ourselves about ourselves” (Geertz 1973, 448), that correlates whiteness with country music and blackness with genres like jazz, blues, and gospel (Roy 2004; Pecknold 2007; 2013). These correlations, which date back to the division between so-called race records and hillbilly records in the early 1920s, continue to affect our perceptions of music, race, and genre today.29 In a provocatively titled article, “Why Does Country Music Sound White?” Geoff Mann (2008) shows how country singing styles have historically indexed primarily white, working-class identities. Many successful Native, African American, and Mexican American country singers notwithstanding,30Mann (2008, 75) attempts to denaturalize the supposed link between whiteness and country music, arguing that whiteness is not reflected in country music so much as it is consciously produced and reinstantiated by it through the entertainment industry and by early hillbilly records moguls targeting white audiences in particular (Jensen 1998; Pecknold 2007, 2013; Peterson 1997). This production of whiteness depended on thematic material, instrumentation, the consistent use of a southeastern U.S. dialect in singing, and the utilization of an instrumental and vocal “twang” (Fox 2004a; Samuels in Feld et al. 2004). Defined as “gliding a single vowel sound to give it two audibly distinct segments,” twang is so consistently used in country performance as to have become a “virtually substitutable marker of ‘country’ and ‘racial’ identification” (Mann 2008, 79).

* * *

In my own experience playing, teaching about, and singing country music in both Native and non-Native spaces, twang is also the element of country that elicits the strongest reaction from listeners, becoming an easy target for what people either love or hate about country music (Fox 2004b, 29–46; Samuels in Feld et al. 2004, 339). As Mann notes, tongue-in-cheek, about the cultural politics of race and musical genre in the United States: “There is little in contemporary American popular culture more ‘obvious’ than the ‘colour’ of music. We simply ‘cannot fail to recognize’… the blackness of hip-hop or soul, the whiteness of heavy metal or country” (Mann 2008, 77–78).31 The point is thus to inquire into “the American-born social grounds of racially attributable stylistic procedures,” since the “perception of musical difference [has] grown so thoroughly racialized that music [has come] to epitomize racial differences generally” (Radano 2003, 8, 9). The racialization of musical genres stands in for perceived racial difference, marking its performers in limiting and sometimes stigmatizing ways (Radano and Bohlman 2000, 8; Bigenho 2012, 21). This racialization is what Perea (2012, 9) refers to as “sound quantum,” or the racialized understandings of what counts as Native music, which relies in part on a performer's blood quantum. Just as clean corollaries between identity and race need to be complicated and unpacked, so too do ideas of musical genre, race, and perceptions of social difference.

Less evident in discussions of race and musical genre is the long and deep history of Dine’é performing country music in reservation spaces, as evidenced in names like Garth Brooks Yazzie, George Strait Begay, Shelby Lynne Henry, and Shelby Lynne Arviso, all common Navajo surnames appended to the stage names of famous country vocalists. Because of its long history in Diné communities dating back to the 1930s, musicians and music fans in the Navajo Nation also frequently reference country music as a “traditional” genre of music (Jacobsen 2009), one that resonates deeply with rural Navajo lifestyles and ranching in particular. Such appellations of course complicate our ideas of tradition and its link to time depth and supposed Native authenticity. At the same time, they also point to another long-standing Navajo practice, that of ranching and rodeo competition (Downs 1972; Iverson 1994). In Navajo spaces, then, country singing indexes not only whiteness but also a generation-specific Navajo and even Indian identity.

In contrast to the sometimes stigmatizing responses to Radmilla and Chucki Begay singing supposedly black styles of music, Navajos singing allegedly white musical genres such as country do not elicit strong responses among the Diné citizenry. In fact, bands performing country music are considered fairly commonplace—there are currently more than fifty country bands active on the Navajo Nation—and unremarkable. Yet when musicians begin to sing in a thick rez accent, employ a monotone nasal singing style, or use older public address systems with low-fidelity speakers or no monitors, these bands re-mark their music as sounding explicitly Navajo. When choosing to perform in this older style, in a sound that explicitly indexes the first Navajo country bands of the 1950s, fans often approvingly comment that it sounds “Navajo,” “mono,” or “rez” again. Sounding Navajo and playing country correspond, but often only when country is played in a certain way and when a narrow canon of older country songs is performed. Country can be both white and Navajo, but these racial identities are specific to a generation.

Similar to the U.S. racial identities discussed earlier, white musical styles such as country are more easily subsumed into Indianness than are black musical styles such as hip hop, soul, and blues. Although Radmilla herself classifies her music as Native American, those who listen to her, market her, and describe her music for the press consistently mark it as black first and Native American second. This parallels the description and understanding of black-Native parentage in American public culture. Just as “sounding Navajo” can be overdetermined in and through the performance of older country music, blackness becomes equally essentialized through its assumed links to musical genres and singing styles historically associated with African American performers but long since integrated into the domains of vocalists from various racial identities and expressive cultural worlds (Radano 2003, 8).

CONCLUSION

On returning to the reservation from prison,32 Radmilla once again met with trepidation and some anger, much of it stemming from the sense that she had not lived up to the role model responsibilities of a Miss Navajo and, by extension, of White Shell Woman, First Woman, and Changing Woman. Since then, she has largely been rehabilitated within the Navajo Nation: She is a recent Grammy nominee,33 in addition to being a public figure, having an active recording career, and pursuing a master’s degree in sociology. She has also started a domestic-violence nonprofit for teenagers, the Life Is Beautiful Campaign, and stars in the recent documentary Hearing Radmilla.34 Like many other national celebrities and politicians from Bill Clinton to Tiger Woods (see Starn 2011), Radmilla sought public forgiveness and in her case found redemption through her public activism, her singing, and her recording career.

As I have shown with both Radmilla and my own fieldwork, how we hear the singing and speaking voice is informed by deeper cultural expectations surrounding racial identity, gender, and differing assumptions about blood and sound as this relates to Navajo, African American, and Anglo identities. When voices do not match our expectations or when identity and musical genre appear not to align, we are challenged to broaden our understandings of self in relation to society and aesthetics in relation to politics. Radmilla’s voice does this work because of the aesthetic and cultural mixture it represents, but also because it is both socially inscribed and simultaneously inimitable, unique to one singer and one body.

As auditory creatures socialized into sound, we are uniquely vulnerable to sound and voice: including voice as part of our ethnographic inventory is essential not only because of how deeply and unconsciously we internalize sound but also because voices represent the meeting point between the individual and the social. If words are the “sign of the voice” (Frith 1988, 121), then voice and vocality are “among the body’s first mechanisms of difference” (Feld et al. 2004, 341). Sonic differences carry social differences because sound is laden with value, socially embedded, and often inextricable from ideas of genre, nation, and identity.

Sound and voice matter to a politics of indigeneity because voice indexes identity almost instantaneously; through this process, voices cement and challenge our expectations for how Native peoples “sound” and signify their own varied attachments to being indigenous. Voices stretch and change our expectations of phenotype because, ultimately, we are more forgiving and open to experimentation in the world of aesthetics than we are in our cultural politics about race. Thus voices carry weight because “recognition” itself—at both the individual and tribal levels—is often on the line. Aesthetics and politics matter because they mutually inform how we hear sound and how we assess belonging to a given social body.

Fusing musical elements from Navajo traditional culture, Christian hymnody, and popular genres of music preferred by a younger generation of Navajos, Radmilla’s voice in many ways epitomizes and unifies contemporary Navajo experience, cultural influences, and listening practices. As Radmilla (qtd. in Cordova 2012) recently noted: “People forget that there are more similarities than differences. … They get caught up in trying to dissect and break things apart when it comes to race and culture, and they wind up separating people rather than bringing them together.” Building on this, she articulated a tenet of her own life philosophy to graduating seniors at the 2013 Chinle High School graduation ceremony: “When someone gets in your way or tries to put you down, bless them and move on.”

4 The American Anthropological Association’s Project Race states: “Physical variations in the human species have no meaning except the social ones that humans put on them” (Smedley 1998). While I want to acknowledge that race is indeed a social construct, for the purposes of this article, I foreground what Biolsi has termed the “social fact” of race, or the way that race is assigned social meaning in its lived, everyday contexts (Biolsi 2005, 400).

12 See these letters to the editor in the Navajo Times: “Interracial Marriages Have Deep Ties” and “Sense of Identity,” December 30, 1997; “What’s Your Beef?!” January 22, 1998; “Superior Disgust,” April 2, 1998; “Mothers Love Their Children, Who They Are,” April 16, 1998.

13 For a view outlining the pros and cons of banning racial epitaphs, see Kennedy 2002.

14 In an e-mail from Radmilla (e-mail to author, March 1, 2011), she writes that “the new term that I now use for African Americans is Nahiłii which is broken down in the following way: Na (across), hił (dark, calmness, have overcome and persevered and we’ve come to like), ii (oneness).”

15 In the Navajo kinship system, if two people share the same maternal, or first, clan, they consider themselves brother or sister.

16 Officially called CDIB (Certificate Degree of Indian Blood) cards, in Navajo reservation discourse these cards are typically referred to as simply “CIBs.”

21 The term rhythm and blues (R & B) was attributed to the Billboard writer Jerry Wexler in 1947. By 1949, R & B replaced the Billboard chart category of “Race” records, or music that was marketed to a primarily African American audience (Scaruffi 2003).

32 At the risk of cementing a discourse I am critiquing, Radmilla was caught smuggling cocaine through Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona; she was convicted as an accomplice to a large international drug smuggling ring and, in January 2003, sentenced to twenty-one months in a federal prison (Gallup Independent, December 11, 2002). Radmilla would later assert that her longtime boyfriend, the drug kingpin David Dwight Bellamy, had habitually abused her and that, to avoid physical punishment, she had been commandeered into trafficking drugs as his accomplice.

Downs, James1972 “The Cowboy and the Lady: Models as a Determinant of the Rate of Acculturation among the Piñon Navajo.” In Native Americans Today, edited by H. M. Bahr, B. Chadwick, and R. Day, 275–91. New York: Harper and Row.

Feld, Stephen, Aaron Fox, Thomas Porcello, and David Samuels2004 “Vocal Anthropology: From the Music of Language to the Language of Song.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Alessandro Duranti, 321–45. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

2004b “White Trash Alchemies of the Abject Sublime: Country as ‘Bad’ Music.” In Bad Music: The Music We Love to Hate, edited by Christopher Washburne and Maiken Derno, 39–61. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

Frith, Simon1988Music for Pleasure: Essays in the Sociology of Pop. New York: Routledge.

McAllester, David P.1954Enemy Way Music: A Study of Social and Esthetic Values as Seen in Navaho Music. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University: vol. 41, no. 3. Cambridge, Mass.: Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology.

Painter-Thorne, Suzianne2010 “If You Build It, They Will Come: Preserving Tribal Sovereignty in the Face of Indian Casinos and the New Premium on Tribal Membership.” Lewis and Clark Law Review 14, no. 1: 311–53.

Roediger, David2002 “Whiteness and Ethnicity in the History of ‘White Ethnics’ in the United States.” In Race Critical Theories: Text and Context, edited by Philomena Essed and David Theo Goldberg, 181–98. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

Abstract

In this article, I examine race, sound, and belonging through an analysis of the first Navajo/African American Miss Navajo Nation, Radmilla Cody. Cody, a professional singer and a Navajo citizen, has been a polarizing public figure in Navajo communities since her crowning in 1997. Utilizing a mixed methodology of participant observation, sound recordings, and press releases, I probe how sound and voice inform a politics of indigeneity in today’s Navajo Nation (Diné Bikéyah). Focusing on black/Native parentage and how sound serves as an additional form of marking, I foreground how voice, musical genre, and blood quantum inform public opinion about social authenticity and about who belongs as a Diné citizen. My larger contention becomes that both poetics and politics matter, albeit in differing ways and on divergent scales.

Keywords

Acknowledgments

My deepest thanks go to the bands who allowed me to play with them—Native Country Band, Re-Coil and the Ramblin’ Wranglers—and to my Navajo language teacher, Shirley Bowman. The Wenner-Gren Foundation Dissertation Fieldwork Grant, the Jacobs Research Fund, and the Lynn Reyer Award for Tribal Community Development supported the research on which this article is based. Permission to conduct research was granted by the Duke University Internal Review Board, the Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department (Class C Ethnographic Permit C0807-E), and former Crownpoint Chapter President, McGarrett Pablo. I am grateful to Orin Starn, Louise Meintjes, and Kerry Thompson for making helpful comments on drafts of the manuscript.

About the Author

Kristina Jacobsen-Bia is an assistant professor in the Departments of Music and Anthropology at the University of New Mexico. Her research focuses on anthropology of the voice, the politics of authenticity, indigeneity and belonging, music of Native North America and the Appalachian mountains, race and musical genre, music as cultural performance, indigenous language revitalization, and working-class expressive cultures. As an anthropologist, ethnomusicologist, and performing musician, Jacobsen-Bia is invested in linking cultural politics to scholarship about music, art, and aesthetics. She is currently working on a book manuscript based on her ethnographic research on the Navajo Nation, where she sang and played steel guitar with Diné country western bands for two and a half years. For more on Jacobsen-Bia’s work, please visit her faculty page.

Interview with Kristina Jacobsen-Bia

Ann Iwashita: It strikes me that the Navajo Nation covers a vast area across Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah, and that different Navajo Chapters may have contradictory politics surrounding Radmilla’s wide acclaim. Are there patterns you have noted that speak to how politics of race and authenticity might be differentially distributed in geographic space? In turn, how do people in this broad contingency mapped as the Navajo Nation make sense of Radmilla and her success? How do they support or deny her becoming?

Kristina Jacobsen-Bia: In my time spent living on both the Arizona and New Mexico sides of the Navajo reservation, I saw varying responses to the politics of language, place, and authenticity. Similarly, I hear and see mixed responses to Radmilla’s voice and her message about inclusion and belonging.

Land history is different on reservation portions in each state. For example, on the Arizona-side reservation land is contiguous and is held in trust by the Federal government for the Navajo people. Tribal sovereignty, of course, predates the birth of both territories, which later became states, but nonetheless these jurisdictional differences can be salient on Navajo land today. On the easternmost portion of the New Mexico side, the area known as “Eastern Agency” is checkerboarded, meaning that reservation land is interspersed with private ranch land, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), National Forest Service (NFS), National Park Service (NPS), and other federal land-owning entities. These land-allocation patterns have led, in my experience, to differential perceptions of authenticity, where Arizona reservation residents are often perceived as being more “authentic” in some sense, more connected to ceremonial life, heritage-language abilities, and adhering to traditional matrilocal residence patterns. At the same time, this authenticity badge is often a double-edged sword, where being more authentically Navajo, hauling water, owning livestock, and living a more traditional lifestyle also opens one up to the criticism of being “hick” or, as the pejorative local term has it, “jáán.”

On the New Mexico side, in contrast, residents sometimes perceive themselves as being less traditional, more racially and culturally “mixed,” particularly in regards to mixture with Hispano, Apache, and Pueblo communities. This leads to the self-perception and impressions by Arizona residents of Checkerboard dwellers as being less authentically or traditionally Navajo.

Perhaps because of this open acknowledgement of mixture and lack of “purity” in a “blood quantum” sense, Crownpoint residents seem less concerned with Radmilla’s biracial background and often more appreciative of her voice and her music. At the same time, because she is an “Arizona Navajo,” Radmilla is also less well-known on New Mexico sides of the reservation, and the debate swirling around her at the time of the crowning was centered largely on Arizona reservation land.

AI: You talk about the ironies of the one-drop rule for a person of mixed African-American and Indian descent, whereby “it [takes] one drop of blood to make a black person, but it takes a lot of blood to make an Indian” (Arica Coleman in Schilling 2013, 1). How do you see the politics of authenticity and representation within the Navajo Nation mirroring and challenging American legal logic of blood quantum and phenotype?

KJB: I see it as both mirroring and challenging it simultaneously. This ambiguous indexicality (Samuels 2004) seems to me to be a very accurate expression of the complexities of contemporary sovereignty as it's enacted by what the Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall termed “domestic dependent nations.” On the one hand, having a higher blood quantum or being a “4/4” Navajo, for example, is absolutely linked to ideas of Navajo authenticity and social belonging. Similarly, phenotype and skin color are also used as indexes of Navajo authenticity, both within Diné communities and in negotiating insider/outsider ideas of Navajo authenticity. In these ways the politics of authenticity and belonging are reflective of larger U.S. policies of blood quantum and phenotype, and reflect the “domestic” and “dependent” parts of sovereign indigenous nations.

On the other hand, there are many Navajo citizens, including Radmilla and her maternal grandmother, who insist that being Navajo isn’t about external factors such as appearance and blood quantum. These citizens use historical and epistemological determinants of belonging, such as matrilineal clan, place of birth, and linguistic and cultural knowledge, as methods to assess who belongs and who doesn’t. These perspectives reflect the self-standing “nation” definition of sovereignty as it applies to federally recognized tribes in the United States. Interestingly, it's often older Navajos who use the latter criteria, and younger Diné who are more adamant about blood quantum and phenotype.

AI: During your dissertation fieldwork, you were the member of a country western band in the Navajo Nation. Can you speak to how this shaped your understanding of the lines along which racial politics in music lies, especially in terms of how one looks, what one knows, how one speaks and acts?

KJB: Being an Anglo, female musician playing with all-Navajo bands absolutely shaped my own understandings of racial politics as these played out in bands and in the settings where we performed. This difference served as both an asset and a detriment. First and most problematically, since the main band I played with was called Native Country, there was always the question of what to do with the bilagáana [Anglo] singer and steel player. This came up particularly in live performance situations and in the making of our first album when it came to the album cover and how to accurately represent ourselves as “Native Country.” Many of these suggestions involved asking me to “play Indian” to buttress the Native credentials of the band, such as the band leader suggesting that I tell everyone I was either “Lumbee” or “Cherokee” (something I declined to do) or that I put a feather in my Tony Lama hat for a more “Native” effect.

On the other hand, my Anglo identity lent us credibility in obtaining off-reservation gigs, particularly in more racially fraught “border town” bars in towns such as Page, Gallup, and Winslow. Bar owners and managers also problematically assumed, because I was Anglo, that I was the band manager, organizer, etc., which was absolutely not the case. Finally, having a bilagáana singer in a Native band also marked our band as a sort of gimmick in ways which were sometimes good for marketing purposes and for procuring gigs in a super-saturated market where there are over fifty country bands performing on the reservation.

Finally, having a bilagáana singer in a Native band also marked our band as a sort of gimmick in ways which were sometimes good for marketing purposes and for procuring gigs in a super-saturated market where there are over fifty country bands performing on the reservation.

AI: It strikes me that you have a deep understanding of music: the weavings of breath, tone, and notes that can run beneath, or give life to, lyrics. Could you take us through part of a song, maybe “A Beautiful Dawn,” describing the movement of the voice? What would it mean to be able to detach the songs from their singer’s race and image, and even perhaps from a musical genre? What would you hear?

KJB: Let’s look at 0:26–0:45 of “A Beautiful Dawn.” Written by Radmilla’s uncle and noted composer and singer, Herman Cody, “A Beautiful Dawn” is a song composed in a traditional-sounding vein for solo voice. The song begins with vocables, or non-lexical, formulaic syllabic patterns specific to certain songs and Navajo musical genres. Vocables in this song include “He ya ne ye yanga,” “iye ye,” and “ne yo wo.” Following the vocables, “he ya ne ye yanga,” in the first referential line of the song, “Nizhonigo hayiłkaah” (in a serene state, the dawn comes), the voice swoops up on the word “nizhonigo” (beautifully or serenely) on an interval of a perfect fifth and then descends, incrementally, back down to the opening pitch or note of the song.

As you listen to the descent, Radmilla links each descending pitch to the next pitch by employing melismas or vocal glides from one pitch to another, sliding from one note into the next and disguising the register shift from her head voice to her chest voice in the process. We can hear this on the syllable “-go” at the end of “nizhonigo.”

In contrast to vocal performances in country music, for example, where accentuating the register shifts or “breaks” between head and chest voice (as we might hear in a yodel) is a prized part of country performance practice, here Radmilla seamlessly integrates her “head” and “chest” voices so that we don’t hear the voice breaks at all. You can also hear Radmilla using vibrato, or rapid variations in pitch producing a pulsing or trembling effect, on sustained notes ending in vowels on the syllables, for example on the syllables “-kaah” and vocables “iye ye.” Breath also factors prominently in this recording. Radmilla does short, sharp breath intakes between phrases as a sort of punctuation—particularly effective because this song is written for solo voice. In contrast to many Navajo traditional singers, you also hear very little nasality in Radmilla’s singing style and a less “pressed” sounding voice. Instead, breath here becomes an expressive resource utilized to communicate emotional involvement and investment on the singer’s part in the vocal performance.

AI: At the close of your article, you write, quite beautifully, “Voices stretch and change our expectations of phenotype because, ultimately, we are more forgiving and open to experimentation in the world of aesthetics than we are in our cultural politics about race” (19). This is a new politics of recognition, which is not officiated by legal system or policy, but rather by vulnerabilities and attachments to sound, as well as an openness to the possibility that there are limits to our own knowledge of what might bring us more fully into our own lives. In your view, what does Radmilla represent in this vast political landscape of indigeneity, race, and music? What potential does she manifest, in her very existence?

KJB: Radmilla’s voice challenges the neat categories we often create and then naturalize between racial identity and musical genre. In the case of the Navajo Nation, it also challenges assumptions about indigenous citizenship and belonging and the prescriptive ways that Navajo citizens should both look and sound.

For me, what’s powerful about Radmilla’s voice is the seamless coming together of musico-linguistic practices and myriad musical genres into a voice that is incredibly resonant, powerful, and complete in its own right. At the same time, it’s very hard to dissect and tease apart all of these influences because they are so artfully fused into what I hear as an auratic voice. Her voice is a beautiful example of contemporary indigeneity where, like all identity formations, multiple cultural influences are fused into a complete and discrete entity, which stands, successfully and completely, on its own two feet.