The controversy over the Pentagon decision to award a $35bn refuelling tankercontract to EADS spilled into the presidential race yesterday, when a seniorDemocrat suggested that John McCain, the Republican nominee, was responsible forthe deal being "outsourced" to a European company.

Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic House speaker, said Boeing had been on course to supply the US Air Force with tankers until Mr McCain "intervened"."My understanding is that it was on course for Boeing before. I mean, the thought was that it would be a domestic supplier for it," Ms Pelosi told reporters.

"Senator McCain intervened, and now we have a situation where the contract may be - this work may be outsourced."

Well, yes, Ms. Pelosi, Senator McCain WAS instrumental in stopping the Boeing deal. but what you seem to be... forgetting(?)... is that the reason he opposedthe deal was because it was dirty:

The air force originally chose Boeing to supply it with 100 tankers. ButCongress cancelled the deal after it emerged that Darleen Druyun, a former topair force acquisitions official, had held illegal job discussions with Boeingwhile still negotiating the deal. Ms Druyun admitted boosting the value of thedeal to help Boeing.

Mr McCain has pointed to his aggressive investigation into the Boeingdeal as evidence that he is willing to stand up to powerful corporateinterests.

The tanker scandal claimed the career of former Boeing chief executivePhil Condit. Ms Druyun and Mike Sears, Boeing's former chief financial officer,were sent to jail.

Break the link between legislation and lobbyists by passing lobby reform.

But why is she attacking McCain for doing just what she advocates on her own website? It couldn't be because he's running for president on the ticket of the party she opposes, could it? It couldn't be, as one commenter at the coalition points out, that Boeing's plant is in a region represented by members of her own party, could it?

First they came for Logic, and I did not speak out, for I did not think logically. Then they came for Reason, and I did not speak out, for I did not think reasonably. Then they came for Thesis and Synthesis, and I did not speak out, for I did not think synthetically. Finally they came for me, and I could no longer think for myself.