Time To Take Back
America From The
Democrats And The GOP
From Karl W B Schwarz
kwbschwarz@comcast.net
11-3-5

One of the missions of American Patriot Movement will
be to remove the U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and conduct a full
investigation of 9-11 without a panel of 10 people that are conflicted
on making a full investigation.

Our Constitution, our freedoms and civil liberties have
all been altered because of 9-11, an investigation that has been covered
up by the Bush Administration and Congress. They have even covered up
the Cheney Energy Task Force, where we suspect that it was discussed that
the landlocked oil deals in Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan would
not be landlocked much longer - as Cheney and Bush intended to take control
of the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline, or TAP as it is called, with military
force.

That pipeline was under contract from Turkmenistan, through
Afghanistan, through Pakistan to the ocean with an Argentine oil company
named Bridas Corporation and its parent Bridas S.A.P.I.C. On September
9, 2003, Bridas prevailed at the Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals on
a $500 million interference of contract lawsuit. That lawsuit was then
taken to the U.S. Supreme Court and on March 22, 2004 the high court refused
to hear the case or consider reversing the Fifth Circuit decision. See
US Supreme Court, case 03-1018, State Concern Turkmenneft v. Bridas S.A.P.I.C.,

The Bush Administration does not want any American knowing
the truth about what happened in Afghanistan or that we breached a commercial
contract with military force to take over a deal that was denied to US
oil companies, because there was already a deal in place. Under the Clinton
Administration they upended the Pakistan government to cut off that part
of the Bridas Corporation deal. Under the Clinton Administration, they
compelled Turkmenistan to breach its agreements with Bridas, hence the
judgment award of $500 million for interference of contract.

The only remaining obstacle on 9-11 was the remaining
agreement between the Taliban and Bridas Corporation.

The law firm of Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw was the
firm that kept Bridas tied up in court at Fifth Circuit and at the U.S.
Supreme Court. Senior partner of that law firm, while these lawsuits were
in progress, is Richard Ben Veniste, 9-11 Commission member. He put on
quite a show at the 9-11 Commission while his law firm kept Bridas tied
up in court and not a word said that someone else had beaten the US and
our oil companies to the contracts. This is the same law firm that helped
Andy Fastow at Enron set up all of those bogus offshore SPE [Special Purpose
Entity] that were special just to steal from investors.

This nation is being led by a dishonest government that
will tell any lie to carry out any objective where it involves money, greed
and power. They care not at all what they do in our name or what they
do to undermine our freedoms and what this nation has always stood for.

We have been giving much consideration as to what steps
would have to be taken, and here are but a few: 1. Removal of
all troops from Iraq, possible relocation of those armored divisions to
Palestine; and

2. A series of Executive Orders that would shred
the veils that this government hides behind. All investigations would
be thrown wide open to public view, and all persons that deserve to be
prosecuted would be prosecuted; and

3. Dismantling and re-defining of the Patriot
Act so that it focuses on the problems, and not be used as a tool to undermine
the Constitution and our freedoms; and

4. Fiscal sanity would start by reigning in
the wasteful spending and the National Debt curve would start heading
the other way; and

6. Barring of AIPAC from Capitol Hill due to
them being a foreign lobbyist that is decidedly pro-Israel; and

7. Deregulation and breaking up the media monopolies
and other monopolies that threaten this nation and the wellbeing of each
and every one of us. None of us can make good decisions in a vacuum or
when lies are being spoon fed to us.

California, the liberal bastion that it is, should support
me for one simple reason. I would force the 21 energy companies that plundered
the rate payers of California to reimburse that $5.5 to $7.5 billion they
stole and Bush did nothing about it but dole out miniscule fines compared
to the crime. That some of those 21 firms are involved in the big Caspian
Basin oil deals is something that deserves a full investigation regarding
the light nature of their fines. These are the same firms that sat in
on the Cheney Energy Task Force that the Bush Administration does not want
anyone to look into.

The Bush Administration, and the Clinton Administration
to keep the record straight, does not want Americans to know about Bridas
Corporation or that they had signed major oil and gas development agreements
with Turkmenistan as early as 1992 and 1993. They then signed agreements
with Pakistan and Afghanistan because the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline is
one of but a few routes to get the landlocked Caspian Basin oil to the
ocean and distributed around the world.

There is another route and that is through the former
Russian state of Georgia. The leader of that nation, Georgian prime minister
Zurab Zhvania decided he was against the oil pipelines coming through his
nation and he wound up assassinated shortly after he made that fateful
decision. Our press painted the picture that he was killed due to his
coziness with the "West", but the fact is he was against our
pipelines coming through Georgia. You do the math.

http://english.pravda.ru/world/20/92/371/15532_zhvania.html

Both the Bush and Clinton Administrations do not want
Americans to know that Bridas was interfered with in Turkmenistan and Pakistan
to isolate both the Taliban and Bridas Corporation regarding the Trans-Afghanistan
Pipeline, a pipeline that we now control through use of military force
in Afghanistan and raises serious questions about our true motives in attacking
Afghanistan following 9-11.

The Bush Administration does not want Americans to know
that Bridas Corporation and their parent Bridas SAPIC, prevailed in our
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding interference of contract in Turkmenistan.
That decision was handed down from a US Court on September 9, 2003, while
the 9-11 Commission and Bush Administration were in cover up mode on 9-11.
Bridas SAPIC v. Government of Turkmenistan, et al., No, 02-20929, 5th Cir

http://www.asil.org/ilib/ilib0620.htm

The Bush Administration does not want Americans to know
about the U.S. Supreme Court decision handed down on March 22, 2004, while
the 9-11 Commission was still playing "Where's Waldo?" that the
High Court denied the Writ of Certiorari and let the Fifth Circuit decision
stand. Case Number 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas S.A.P.I.C. See Certiorari
Denied at this link:

You did not hear of this from Bush, Congress or the 9-11
Commission, and it is time you started asking why you did not hear about
this from them.

How much oil is in the Caspian Basin? More then 200
billion barrels, a thirty-year supply and worth over $12 trillion dollars.
For every day of 30 years, that is just shy of 10 supertankers full of
2 million barrels of oil. That is right - 10 supertankers a day for every
day the next 30 years. That is the single biggest "motive"
for any crime I have ever seen and was the probable reason that 9-11 was
engineered so certain parties could take over that pipeline and that colossal
oil and gas deal. How much natural gas? Reportedly as much as 12 trillion
cubic meters, or about $3 trillion worth of natural gas on top of the vast
oil reserves.

It is not my word against Bush and Clinton. The historical
facts and US court records say all that needs to be said about the possible
taint on our real motives of heading towards Afghanistan. If our motives
for invading Afghanistan were a lie, just like Iraq has been, the matter
needs to be looked into and possible charges brought against certain people.
Just consider that Afghanistan and our actions there are directly tied
to 9-11. I have met very few people that think the 9-11 Commission was
doing its job rather than covering it up.

Did you know about Bridas Corporation? Did you know
about Mr. Ben Veniste's law firm being involved the Caspian Basin and keeping
Bridas Corporation tied up in the court case while he was sitting on the
9-11 Commission?

These 9-11 Commissioners all have vested financial reasons
directly and indirectly to see 9-11 covered up as it was:

Fred Thompson, former Rep governor of Illinois, sits
on the board of FMC and oil equipment subsidiary doing well in the Caspian
Basin. Afghanistan pipeline needed to get that landlocked oil and natural
gas to the oceans.

John F. Lehman, John F. Lehman & Company, Rep, former
Secretary of the Navy, now a private equity firm directly involved in Big
Defense

Richard Ben Veniste, senior partner Mayer Brown Rowe
& Maw. Formerly was the lead counsel for Enron and all of those fraudulent
offshore entities set up by Andy Fastow, and Mayer Brown used to share
an office with Enron in Uzkekistan. Now Enron is Primus Energy, Cayman
Islands, all former Enron International and former Halliburton people as
management. Mayer Brown also kept Bridas tied up in court prior to, during
and following 9-11, and while the 9-11 Commission was conducting a mock
investigation. The name Bridas Corporation never came up publicly in any
Congressional hearings or the 9-11 Commission.

Jamie Gorelick, sits on the board of Schlumberger, firm
is raking in record profits from Caspian Basin business

Tim Roemer, has taken political donations for years while
in Congress from Carlyle Group (Big Defense), Chevron (Big Oil and heavily
involved in the Caspian Basin and Condoleezza Rice as former Chervon board
member), and Van Scoyoc & Associates, major foreign lobbyist for Big
Defense and Big Oil.

Any way you cut it, a 7 to 3 majority by people who have
direct conflicts of interests is still a majority on the 9-11 Commission
and makes it easy to cover up what really happened.

For those Americans that think Clinton had nothing to
do with the lead up to invading Afghanistan over a pipeline we could not
otherwise get control of, take a look at what self-acclaimed Neocon Max
Boot, senior fellow Council for Foreign Relations had to say in an interview
with the Christian Science Monitor: The Neocons tried for years to get
Clinton to act.

"What type of foreign policy/security strategy would
an Al Gore administration have set after Sept. 11? How different would
it have been from the one that emerged from the Bush White House?

I think it's likely that the Gore administration would
have invaded Afghanistan after 9/11. I think it's unlikely they would have
invaded Iraq. That's the big difference."

They had been planning the takeover of that Trans-Afghanistan
Pipeline for many years. If you understand that the same wealthy elite
special interests own both parties in DC, you are understanding the gravity
of the problem. Bridas started signing contracts with Turkmenistan, the
north end of that pipeline in 1992 and 1993. That is a provable and documented
fact and it was also long before any of our oil companies were welcome
in the region. Bridas also saw the strategic importance of having a way
to get the landlocked oil and gas to the ocean and the shortest route to
do that is from Turkmenistan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan to an ocean
port.

Max Boot also does us all a service by having a Neocon
provide a definition as to what a Neocon really is at this link:

http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/180

What The Heck Is A Neocon?

By Max Boot Wall Street Journal December 30, 2002

I have been called many names in my career -- few of
them printable -- but the most mystifying has to be "neocon."
I suppose I get labeled thus because I am associated, in a small way, with
the Weekly Standard, which is known as a redoubt of "neoconservatism."

But what the heck is a neocon anyway in 2003? A friend
of mine suggests it means the kind of right-winger a liberal wouldn't be
embarrassed to have over for cocktails. That's as good a definition as
any, since the term has clearly come unmoored from its original meaning.

'Mugged by Reality'

The original neocons were a band of liberal intellectuals
who rebelled against the Democratic Party's leftward drift on defense issues
in the 1970s. At first the neocons clustered around Sen. Henry "Scoop"
Jackson, a Democrat, but then they aligned themselves with Ronald Reagan
and the Republicans, who promised to confront Soviet expansionism. The
neocons, in the famous formulation of one of their leaders, Irving Kristol,
were "liberals mugged by reality."

They were never conservatives, only pretended to be.

The only solution I can see to restore America is to
consolidate the third parties, the disaffected Republican and Democrats
who have figured it out, and Take Back America before we have nothing left
worth having to take back.

I cannot stress enough that no single person can take
there people on and win. It will take a grassroots effort that equals
or exceeds either the DNC or RNC. It will take money and lots of it to
get the media and air time needed to get the message out to America. The
2004 presidential election was a $1 billion show between Bush, Kerry and
their wealthy elite / corporate backers.

If Americans want change, they have to be prepared to
match RNC and DNC at least dollar for dollar to make that change happen.

The Campaign Website is up and open for contributions
at www.karlschwarz2008.com

http://www.karlschwarz2008.com/

It is time to Take Back America and that will require
that all of us be in the front lines and not sitting back and watching
the show. If you have the time, please forward this email update to all
that you know, for their futures are at stake too.