On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 19:39, Mike Kestner wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 13:20, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> > > Unfortunately, this doesn't look possible. We are locked into the
> > > Gnome-2.2 platform through June,
> >
> > Why?
>> Because I need to stick to a version that is widely supported by binary
> packages for the bound libraries.
Sorry, for a moment, I thought that GNOME 2.2 had GTK+ 2.0, which would
have been ancient. But it actually has GTK+ 2.2, so that makes more
sense.
> I don't have the luxury of a stable
> release yet for people to develop against while I target the bleeding
> edge. People are already using Gtk# for real commercial development,
> even though we haven't frozen the API yet.
>> After June, things get a lot more flexible.
OK, thanks, I've been in the same situation at first. By the way, why
haven't I seen this discussed on your mailing list before it was
announced? Did I miss something?
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc@murrayc.com