A civilisation
may only be as advanced as its understanding of the relationship between science
and religion. One may encounter the occasional evaluation and comparison of these
subjects, such as in a television documentary, seemingly endeavouring to reconcile
these topics. In fact, deceptively they are doing exactly the opposite---they
are increasing the polarity of the subjects rather than the unity. In a nutshell,
if you wish to arrest the development of a society and/or enslave its members
you keep physics and religion separate.

Since
this is a world expressed through energy patterns and knowledge structures then
physics is the basic subject and can potentially come to the rescue in handling
all facets of our existence---including the mental and spiritual. The current
conflicting viewpoint of the atheist and the religionist can be placed in a (higher)
context that is guaranteed to unite them into a single acceptable viewpoint, within
a single subject---which would probably be called a 'spiritual science'. The word
spirituality might be defined as the multidimensional physics of inner space (see
article The Suppression of Inner Space).

Possibly
the main three key factors which can reconcile physics and religion are 1) recognition
of inner space, 2) that all basic fractals are internal fractals, and 3) the correct
recognition and evaluation of unity, the undivided whole, or the quantum state.
Number (1) immediately links the objectivity and external world with the inner
consciousness, the 'within' and the source and perpetuation of the material, external
world. Number (2), internal fractals, shows us that in the same manner that a
twig on a tree goes from the many (twigs) to smaller groupings, through fractal
levels, branches attached to larger branches, etc. to a single entity, the tree
trunk, similarly universe structures go back in an organised and nested manner
through inner (and higher) space to a single source or quantum state---the God
concept, that is, a complete integration through inner space. This is the inevitable
result of true fractals (see article Source of Fractals and the Fractal
Matrix).

Thus we have already formed
the link which unites physics and religion but to consolidate this qualitatively
we need to recognise the third factor. A harmonious connection between physics
and religion can never be made without an acknowledgement of true unity. Thus
we have number 3, unity. Religion emphasises unity but science denies it and shuns
the term 'holistic', except occasionally in quantum physics. Science only teaches
that unity is composite or is a simulated wholeness, made up of parts stuck together
by forces. Science tells us that the universe is just made up of particles (attached
by forces). But quantum physics has shown that this view only comes into existence
when the observation or detection process is made. Hence current science is not
looking at the real universe; in a similar way---as an analogy--- to a community
of ants living on the bonnet (hood) of a motor vehicle that has a 'science' of
the heat and vibrations of the surface (from the running engine) but totally unaware
of the 'vast' machinery of the (inner space) engine source. (See figures in articles
on superspace, and also the basic energy unit, which indicate some of this vast
machinery of inner space.)

Scientific
methodology and human ego-observation by the physical senses create their own
contextual interface with the universe. These lower-dimensional senses and detection
processes will only invoke 3D spacetime observations and corresponding knowledge.
More advanced knowledge must be obtained from the mind which would also avoid
the potential illusions of the physical senses and the inevitability of the 3D
particle view, as invoked by scientific methodology. Nevertheless some scientists
are involved in a very different field, that of researching quantum states to
be used for faster computers. True unity is a whole quantum state and is not 3D.
It, in effect, opens up into higher inner fractals---like a window, achieved through
curvature of space. This is also what humans accomplish when they create qualitative
states by unifying or putting order into the quantitative.

The
great spiritual leader which we know (erroneously) by the name 'Jesus Christ'
clearly understood the inner-consciousness and inner-space aspects of life and
expressed this by the statements: 'the Father within', 'the Kingdom within', and
'the closet within'. We shouldn't view the separation of external and inner space
as abruptly separate (see article The Suppression of Inner Space). Inner
space and consciousness will be experienced as nested layers of alternate objectivity
and subjectivity according to a consciousness perceiving or existing in these
inner and higher levels/realms. Meaning that there will be a degree of objectivity
(externalness) within this inner-space hierarchy but of reducing ratio, objectivity:subjectivity
to complete subjectivity at the Source.

Thus the Source is within inner space and not across external space. If you want
to dis-empower a religious community you teach them that God is external. Once
we have established the above relationship between the inner and outer, we can
then finally understand what 'soul' is. One couldn't have a better analogy than
the fractal system of the tree. Visualise the tree, without leaves for simplicity,
then imagine that the twig fractal level corresponds to humans. To improve the
analogy we should 'convert' the tree into an inner-space system with nested levels.
The 'twig' has a spectrum of frequencies which gives our material and physical
level. We then imagine the next branch to which it is attached is in a higher
spectrum and invisible to the twig. Similarly for the next third fractal branch,
which is a still higher spectrum of frequencies and is outside the range of the
second branch's spectrum. This goes on all the way back to Source, the tree trunk.
But note that in the analogy we are converting the linear branches of the actual
tree into inner-space nonlinear fractals as we go from twig to source. We see
now that the soul is the second fractal level (that the twig, human, is attached
to). The third one could be called 'oversoul', and so on.

Thus
we see that consciousness is fractalised, as would be expected since everything
else appears to obey the fractal laws. Let us present a final analogy (given in
a previous article) which gives the big picture combining a dimensional framework
with the spirituality of inner space.

Firstly
we picture a box in front of us (box 1)---with walls or merely an open framework.
This is an analogy for our 3D, our material existence, the entirety (virtually)
of our apparent space and of what science and education teaches. This 3D realm
has a particular frequency spectrum (just as a waveband creates our television
picture).

Now imagine a second larger
box (box 2) surrounding the first, that is, the first is inside the second. Box
2 has a larger and higher-dimensional framework. It has a higher frequency spectrum.
The characteristics of box 2, such as higher rates of information (higher frequencies),
penetrate the first box but are not readily available to physical senses and the
ego personality (3D must be transcended). Similarly we imagine a third larger
box (box 3) with a still higher-frequency spectrum surrounding box 2 and box 1;
and so forth. These boxes are like fractal levels, just as a twig on a tree (first
fractal level; compare box 1) is attached to a branch (box 2) which in turn is
attached to a larger branch (box 3). We see that the whole system goes back to
a single source (tree trunk or God concept). Box 2 is the so-called 'soul' existence.
The box 3, say, oversoul, etc. The larger boxes have higher frequencies of creation
and this also means the potential for greater integration and unity---that is,
more qualitative. Great classical music is achieved by a human in box 1, 'thinking'
and tuning into higher-frequency aesthetic integrations, opening up a window into
the higher boxes, accessing the greater qualitative states.

Note
that the physics of these windows, giving access to higher dimensions, is that
the greater the unity in spacetime and the quality being created by individuals,
the greater the access (gating) to the higher states. Current (first order) relativity
is based on the context of box 1 only. As long as the knowledge in box 1 is used
and technology is based on this context, relativity will self-prove. However,
it is incorrect if we view life and the universe from box 2; for example, there
is no light barrier and the velocity of light is not constant (see articles on
open and closed systems and self-referencing systems).

The
teachings on this planet are so far from the truth (not an accident), that it
will be a shock to many to discover that their consciousness is fractalised---that
they exist in numerous fractal levels similar to the twig and its higher branches,
as though our original and higher consciousness' spectrum, like white light, has
been split via a prism, separating out into different wavelengths (groups of wavelengths
on different dimensional levels). The author 30 years ago deliberately left this
information out of his book Superhuman as it was considered that no one
would believe it (then). Even more so, that the individual personality
aspect (ascension/evolution) also follows the same rules as the tree---sheer anathema
to the ego (with its self-centred, individualised and contracted consciousness).

Now
in the above model, as we create qualities in box 1, such as, for example, good
art, benevolence, ethics, integrity, compassion, we put elements (particles, parts)
into order/resonance/harmony and wholeness by quantum regeneration (the opposite
of quantum reduction). This creates higher-frequency energies which correspond
to the higher boxes and thus opens up 'wider' windows of greater unity to the
higher properties of boxes 2, 3, etc.

If
enough people behave in this qualitative way, the whole planet and civilisation
(with exceptions) can ascend in frequency into the next higher spectrum---box
1 merges into box 2, etc.---and we have the true meaning of ascension and evolution.