What happened to the £287,000 donated to Farage’s local branch?
Do remember Richard Suchorzewski proved at a meeting in Derby that only approx 10% of the money raised by Ashford ever reached UKIP as subsequently confirmed by David Bannerman, the then UKIP MEP!

Did John Moran the liar and low life who ran the scam trouser the cash or share it with Nigel Farage? we may never know as 100s of £1,000s just went missing!

Richard Suchorzewski was lied about with claims he was homosexual and a BNP member for daring to ask for facts & transparency as an elected NEC member both facts were lies claimed by Nigel Farage’s personal staff.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

What happened to the £287,000 donated to Farage’s local branch?THE GUARDIAN Originally shot for The Guardian. United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) telephone call centre in Ashford, Kent. Nigel Farage, MEP, drinking a cup of tea in the nerve-centre. Graham Turner

Billy Kenber and Alexi MostrousPublished 5 minutes ago

Almost £300,000 in Ukip party donations were paid in to Nigel Farage’s local branch and withdrawn as unspecified “other costs”, raising further questions over the party’s funding.Ukip insiders have repeatedly raised concerns over £287,734 spent by the party’s southeast branch in 2004 and 2005. The money was not used for campaigning, communications, property rental, utilities or auditing and was described only as “other” running costs, according to accounts filed with the Electoral Commission.

In subsequent years, running costs amounted to no more than £8,200. Even though the accounts itemised payments for as little as £496 on communications, they offered no explanation of how the much larger sums were spent.

The withdrawals came as Ukip was chanelling national donations generated by a controversial call centre in Ashford, Kent, into the southeast branch. So concerned were Ukip members about the call centre’s finances that they commissioned an independent report which criticised “a lack of transparency” and called for a full audit.

The fundraising operation, set up in mid-2003 in an office provided free by Alan Bown, Ukip’s biggest donor, has been credited by Mr Farage with raising at least £400,000 and boosting the membership of the fledgeling party.

However, Ukip officials have questioned why much of the donated money never made it to the party’s national coffers. Martin Haslam, the treasurer at Ukip’s southeast branch in 2005, described the call centre as an operation “where money went in and no one quite knew what happened to it”.

In 2006, a group of Ukip members in the south east commissioned a corporate due diligence company to examine the call centre’s business structure. A partial copy of the initial report obtained by The Times indicates that the company raised concerns about “a lack of transparency regarding the set-up and continuing operation of Ashford Employment Ltd [which paid the call centre staff]” and the company history of John Moran, one of the centre’s founders. Mr Moran said he was not aware of the allegations and did not want to comment further.

The report called for an independent auditor to “perform a full audit”, something that insiders say did not happen.

This week, The Times revealed that Mr Farage faces an inquiry into a “missing” £60,000 in EU allowances. Six Ukip officials have complained that their attempts to raise financial concerns were blocked. Documents filed by Ukip with Companies House and the Electoral Commission provide only a partial picture of what happened to funds raised by the call centre.

Ashford Employment Ltd, a company owned by Mr Bown and run by Ukip, was set up in October 2003 to pay for call centre workers. It spent £158,582 in 2004 and £89,456 in 2005. Once staff and the running costs had been met from donations, any surplus from Ashford was transferred to the southeast branch, according to Terry Quarterman, the centre’s former manager and a director of the company. The branch received £291,931 in donations in 2004, the year of the European elections, and £114,967 in 2005, although it is unclear how much was from Ashford.

Former Ukip members have raised concerns about the two large sums that were paid out of the branch in the same two years. In 2004, the branch recorded a £211,267 withdrawal as “other” running costs. In 2005, £89,996 was spent in the same way. Late in 2005, the call centre’s financial affairs were transferred to Ukip’s head office. Ukip said that accounts for the centre were filed with the Electoral Commission. “They were audited as legally required and found to be in order,” a spokesman said.

UKIP are, as predicted, using the spin that the many factual details being exposed by the media are being exposed as a part of an establishment conspiracy to damage UKIP because it is doing well.

Lets look at these foolish claims – firstly UKIP is not doing well that is pure hype after 21 years they still have zero MPs and have never come even close to having one elected and out of 1,750 available Counciller seats UKIP achieved a risible under 150 and of these at least 200 have already fallen out with UKIP some due to racism others due to criminality and when it comes to MEPs of those who were elected about half have quit UKIP having fallen out with Nigel Farage’s dishonesty, bullying and abuse of funds seemingly for his personal gain – including putting his wife on a salary having PROMISED not to employ family to get elected and now also employs at least one of his ex sexual partners!

Consider just how huge UKIP’s failure has been with it still little more than a one man band, more a cult founded on Nigel Farage as its showman but hardly a party more of a joke that leaves a bad taste in one’s mouth – the more you know of UKIP the more corrupt and odious one realises they are.

For the record – despite the obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies of those trying to hide the truth about UKIP, as it is – It is of absolutely no consequence how many read this blog or this web site or my Twitter or my postings around the internet and elsewhere, just like UKIP membership numbers are of no consequence just as it is irrelevant how many watch a UKIP video in America, China or even France – it is a matter of the caliber of those who read the entries NOT numbers.

This web site and all its entries are posted as an archive and if ONE person of influence reads it whether media, politician or individual and it leads to cleaning up & professionalising UKIP & giving it some ethical gravitas and consequence thus making it fit for purpose as a party, which British citizens would be proud to join to Leave-The-EU, it has served its purpose.

This blog is an archive available to all and made as accurate as possible, clearly differentiating between my opinions and values and factual reportage of UKIP.

As is clear: Any error of fact is always corrected, if brought to my attention, and comments are always published – for as long as they are compliant with the terms clearly stated as follows:

We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse.

No comment has EVER been barred or deleted, which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual.

You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner.

We welcome genuine comments.

I have NEVER had personal aspirations politically, nor have I ever stood for office; Further I have NEVER joined or been a member or been funded by any political party, faction or similar organisation.

I have also never had a wife or mistress funded from the public purse, unlike some in UKIP! Nor, unlike a number of UKIP MEPs have I ever been found guilts of fraud or ordered to repay money obtained from the public purse fraudulently or used fraudulently nor ever had an expenses claim investigated or rejected unlike UKIP MEPs, nor unlike UKIP MEPs have I ever beentaken to Court & found guilty of fraud and sentenced to prison or any other punishment.

With Regard To JUNIUS

From my conversations with Team Junius:

I gather their aims were largely similar to mine, as was their aim to inform and provide an archive of facts in support of UKIP becoming fit for purpose, to lead to Leave-The-EU, which clearly it currently is not, as it tends to represent its own personal ambitions rather than British self determination, values and ethics.

At the moment Junius team have largely stopped addressing UKIP’s problems, in the belief that it is unlikely that UKIP will have any consequential influence on domestic politics after their failure in the local elections of 2013 when out of over 1,700 seats in which they stood candidates a mere 147 were elected and already they are falling by the wayside and or resigning due in part to lack of vetting, lack of professionalism and in some cases over racism, inappropriate behaviour and convictions for theft etc.

UKIP’s achievements are so clearly the product of a single individual that Junius has stood back from their role exposing UKIP’s ineptitude and dishonesty as unfit for purpose as to continue putting their own jobs at risk is no longer of sufficient consequence in the light of UKIP’s failure to obtain MPs, Police Crime Commissioners, Mayors or any other role of any gravitas or significance in domestic politics in 20 years.

Team Junius, I am told, will possibly re-enter the position of political commentary if the situation alters and UKIP becomes of greater relevance in UK domestic policy rather than self serving also rans!

Although I have heard from members of Team Junius they and others have passed on the UKIP lies that it is claimed that actions and threats of prosecution by UKIP forced Junius to cease posting.

I can assure readers that the UKIP spin is a pack of lies particularly as they have absolutely no idea who the members of Team Junius are nor are UKIP able to identify a single solitary member of the team. It is therefore abundantly clear that no member of the team has in any way been threatened with prosecution, nor contacted by anyone threatening to prosecute nor has any member EVER been cautioned by any lawyer or the police with regard to their publication of facts and views they publish about UKIP and its clique or claque or even members or policy.

May I also add that the ONLY three threats I have EVER received were founded first on the inept misunderstanding of the law by Michael Zucherman when I used the title ‘catterpillars & butterflies thereby bringing into derision the subsequent utilisation of the imagery used by UKIP subsequently.

The second instance was based on lies presented by Mark Croucher, Clive Page & Paul Nuttall for UKIP, in an attempt to bankrupt me to shut down the flow of facts about UKIP which I present. They lost their case in Court and to date have failed to act honourably and pay the some £13,000 they owe me.

The third instance was based on a pack of lies presented by Gerard Batten regarding which the police were misguidedly duped into interviewing me under caution for some 3 hours. The police decision was there was absolutely no case to answer and that I had not acted in any breech of the law and Gerard Batten was shown to have lied to try to build a case.

Let us be certain – I can unequivocally state that any claim by UKIP that they have intimidated those who publish under the name Junius into giving up is untrue and like so many other stories that emanate from UKIP and its placemen is just a pack of lies.

For more FACTS regarding the accuracy of this site and my postings elsewhere read CLICK HERE

For more FACTS & information about me, including contact data, IF it will help you understand the FACTS this web site and my many other postings cover CLICK HERE

I NEVER post in cowardly anonymity, nor obfuscate my identity as I believe it is an ethical matter of integrity to stand by ones comments. If unsure or deliberately misleading one should NOT demean oneself by dishonesty hiding one’s identity as a coward or a traitor would.

For the record, I repeat: I have NEVER had personal aspirations politically, nor have I ever stood for office; further I have NEVER joined or been a member or been funded by any political party, faction or similar organisation.

I trust these facts help clarify details for the ill informed and the outright liars who seek to defame me, my blogs, postings and web sites.

Peter McGUIGGAN befouling UKIP it seems!It is the behaviour of vile individuals like this that keep the low lifes & rascals in place leading UKIP and so clearly aiding The EU in its Gaulleiter Governance of these United Kingdoms!

Just think what UKIP could achieve if rid of such pond life!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.Hi,

I wasn’t going to use this as it seemed of little relevance and I couldn’t then be bothered third party verifying the facts in view of the mangled grammar and spelling even worse than mine 😉but having received it and mailed it on to Junius, who have now used it – I can well see why they made a number of corrections.

There is the original text as mailed to me by someone who is very much an insider:

Johnny come Late and Delusional Buffoon Peter Mcwiggin

We note with increasing amusement attempts by party loner Peter McGuiggan to claim that Nikki Sinclaire, Mike Nattrass and Trevor Colman have betrayed UKIP by leaving the EFD are becoming more and more frequent on the internal members forum. His constant attacks of hatred are of course made safely from behind his computer screen, to much of a spineless coward to mention any of his gripes to Mike Nattrass when in the same company, not surprisingly as he seems to despise Mike the most?

Peter’s buffoonish antics first came to people’s attention, when he made a complete fool of himself at the party’s West Midlands PEP debate last year when he stood up within the audience to hurl abuse and rudely interrupt speakers making presentations. Fellow members were less than impressed and he quickly sat down when his outbursts had drew drew hisses and shouts of ‘’shut up’’ from the audience.

Others may remember him from his embarrassing outing as a UKIP candidate on the 16th of June also last year when he scrapped a massive 180 votes. Throughout that campaign Peter refused to contribute a penny and demanded EU funding to pay for his by-election leaflets despite being told this was against electoral law. However, Peter was given personalised leaflets for his campaign. How did he thank those that went to the effort of producing and paying for these you might wonder? He hoarded them under the bed and lied about delivering them.

Perhaps had Peter spent as much time campaigning for UKIP as he spent as an Arm Chair warrior he might have achieved more of a result. Like most Farage sycophants, Peter supported UKIP signing up to a PEP – thankfully most members aren’t so easily led.

NEC member Douglas Denny is also becoming increasingly annoyed at Peters immature posts online recently lashing out after another unwarranted attack on Mike Nattrass, correctly stating

‘’Mikes worth to the party and to the cause has been infinitely greater than yourself – of that I have no doubt whatever. Your leaving the party will have no effect and might even be to the good, whereas his leaving the party will be definitely to the detriment of the cause and party’’

We happen to agree.

Despite being put in his place, Peter continues to attack Mr Nattrass proclaiming that he has just four diary engagements for February 2012 and that he pockets £300k pa amongst other rubbish, hoping something will stick. Well Peter, if you are not happy within UKIP why don’t you go back to the party that you came from the BNP!

I can confirm that in substance the material is correct.

Other than for self enrichment why would ANYONE want to be a UKIP MEP?

The jealousies, racism, anti homosexuality and the vile cowards squabbling and back stabbing, frequently too ashamed of their activities to even put their name to their delusional lies shows the Party as comnpletely unfiot for purpose as they aid The EU on a daily basis by presenting a vile and self serving image of EUroScepticism that has proved immensly harmful – little wonder their defenders hide behind false identities and dishonest and iresponsible low lifes like John Ison, Mark croucher, Douglas Denny, Peter Reeve, Derek Clark, Gerard Batten, Mick McGough, Annabelle Fuller, Stuart Gulleford, Malcolm Wood, Michael Greaves, Paul Nuttall and their ilk!

It is little wonder that they are associated with the scum of the gutters of EUropean politics in such extremist groups as The EFD & EAF.

It is such a shame when the Leave-The-EU cause is so strong in these United Kingdoms that it is sabotaged and befouled by the leadership clique of UKIP and their claque in betrayal of the many very genuine and decent members whose gullibility they exploit!