Hi and thanks for visiting the best Ravens forum on the planet. You do not have to be a member to browse the various forums, but in order to post and interact with your purple brethren, you will have to **register**. It only takes a couple of minutes. You can also use your Facebook account to log in....just click on the blue 'FConnect' link at the very top of the page.

There's alot this goverment/military does or doesn't do and the public isn't informed.

That I understand, but in this instance the public definitely has the right to information, all of it. You can simplify it and say lives were lost as a result of the intended inaction of the government.

How's it go again, something along the lines of "establish justice, provide for the common defence."

When the basic foundation for the role of government as outlined by the Constitution is molested, we the people have the right to know why.

... And from the start of the show, she blames Bush for Middle East anger ...

But we start with tonight`s top story and with a decision made in
March 2003, which is when then-President George W. Bush ordered the U.S.- led invasion of Iraq, March 2003 ... That change in policy under George W. Bush was a source of anger and
controversy.

Then, she pleads to her audience to listen to Sec of State Clinton frustration about how folks wont believe that it's a video that sparked this attack.

Then Maddow follows this up by attacking Paul Ryan.

Please show me where in any if this she even hints at Obama doing something wrong, let alone "killing" him for it?

WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and/or supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. All statements and assertions contained herein may be subject to literary devices not limited to: irony, metaphor, allusion and dripping sarcasm.

Just kidding, I do listen a lot but he doesn't talk about news but maybe 40% of the time.

I have a question for you though, you watch Maddow?? How can you stomach that crap for an hour!?!?

Read "Art of War".

It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperilled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperilled in every single battle.

WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and/or supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. All statements and assertions contained herein may be subject to literary devices not limited to: irony, metaphor, allusion and dripping sarcasm.

I did watch Lawrence O'donnell the other night, he actually had some good points about voting 3rd party and why, mainly in states that are almost certain to go for a certain candidate.

I didn't see that but I did vote third party this year.

Mitt is getting Texas regardless so it felt right to vote Gary Johnson.

WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and/or supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. All statements and assertions contained herein may be subject to literary devices not limited to: irony, metaphor, allusion and dripping sarcasm.

So hypothetically speaking, let's say Obama gets reelected. How is his administration going to make this benghazi incident go away?

The clear cut facts that security was requested multiple times in the months coming leading up to the Benghazi attacks, and yet never arrived–despite evidence of an increasing threat seem pretty damning. Not to mention the piles of lies heaped on top of that to divert attention.

Initially I blew it off, but McCain was right. At least noone died at Watergate.

The MSM can ignore it and accuse of "politicizing" all they want, but this is a big F'n deal.

Re: Rogue U.S. General Arrested for Activating Special Forces Team

He doesn't care once he's elected. Nutten's gonna happen to him then.
Now is the time to do something about him but Gretta and Hannity
are the only ones that keep talking about the news and only conservatives watch them.

HR is right about knowing your enemies. Remember the Patton movie where George C. Scott yells "I READ YOUR BOOK ROMMEL, I READ THE BOOK." That was true and Patton anticipated what Rommel would do because he broadcasted his moves before the war even started. It also helped that the British stole Hitler's codes and Patton had advance notice on some of Rommel's battle plans.

The James Bond movies are based on a real spy run by Ian Flemming and he was Hitler's most trusted agent. There was no one name M but there was a section M in the British Secret Service.

Hitler suspected leaks from the agent's sector but executed his boss as the traitor. They got the wrong guy. The real double agent convinced Hitler D-Day invasion would be in the north of France. The Germans always out gunned the British but they beat the Germans with their brains and
trickery.

Anyway, we lost in Vietnam because no one read Giap's book.
He said to diverse and split the enemy. We kept spreading ourselves
out thin all over South Vietnam just like Giap said.

Re: Rogue U.S. General Arrested for Activating Special Forces Team

Originally Posted by Sirdowski

So hypothetically speaking, let's say Obama gets reelected. How is his administration going to make this benghazi incident go away?

The clear cut facts that security was requested multiple times in the months coming leading up to the Benghazi attacks, and yet never arrived–despite evidence of an increasing threat seem pretty damning. Not to mention the piles of lies heaped on top of that to divert attention.

Initially I blew it off, but McCain was right. At least noone died at Watergate.

The MSM can ignore it and accuse of "politicizing" all they want, but this is a big F'n deal.

Good point.

This is a tough one for the President. For all of us who were saying he's a clone of Carter may now have to fix that statement to say, he's a Nixon clone.

But alas, that would require the MSM to do their job.

WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and/or supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. All statements and assertions contained herein may be subject to literary devices not limited to: irony, metaphor, allusion and dripping sarcasm.