> Since I'm not at the office I can't check the text readily, Ken, but I
> suspect that you have not transcribed it altogether accurately; I'm
> guessing that the above should read: HN DE POTE KAI LOGOUS POIOUNTA TINA
> DEHSHi EISAGEN--that the HN is the contracted EAN which is itself a
> contraction of EI AN and that EPOUNTA which certainly looks like a masc.
> acc. ptc. is probably POIOUNTA (because LOGOUS POIEIN is a common enough
> phrase). IF that's what the text is meant to be, THEN: