If Mueller is planning on circling back around to Cohen, why would he issue the referral of what was found?

I don't know. I'm just looking at the facts here:

1. Artemenko has agreed to come and give testimony in front of a grand jury.

2. Grand jury testimony is for obtaining indictments.

3. The only significant thing that Artemenko appears to be involved in was this "peace plan" proposal.

4. There were only four people plus this mutual acquaintance who are known to have been involved at all.

5. Flynn is cooperating and Artemenko is testifying.

Unless there's something else that Artemenko would have knowledge of, doesn't it seem to you to point to the Mueller team trying to get an indictment
related to the "peace plan" affair?

Sater could be the target. I wonder if somebody paid Sater (or even Cohen) for their roles? The only other possibility based on what we know that
occurs to me is that there was somebody behind Artemenko that they were trying to get to. From what I read, there was a lot of skepticism that
Artemenko actually produced the plan himself. Then there's the kompromat on the Poroshenko.

1. Sater flipped and cooperated with the FBI as I mentioned previously. Do you know who flipped him way back then? It was none other than Andrew
Weissmann who signed his plea deal in 1998.

2. He's also reportedly flipped on Viktor Khrapunov, a former Kazakh minister for whom
Sater helped invest millions in US real estate. That's a case BTW that is being prosecuted by the USAO-SDNY. It's also a very big deal because we're
talking billions in fraud.

3. There are also rumors that Sater, who perhaps surprisingly hasn't come up in any of the Mueller investigation-related developments, is cooperating
with the Mueller investigation.

Which is why I said this when Cohen was raided (with a warrant obtained by the USAO-SDNY):

Maybe not argue - rather point out that the 'peace deal' conversation this guy had with Cohen happened in early 2017.
Once again NOTHING to do with the election.

Andrii Artemenko said he could not provide details of his upcoming appearance before the grand jury, which he said is scheduled for Friday. But he
said he assumed he would be asked about the peace plan, about which he communicated with Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s longtime personal
attorney, in early 2017.

What's next - is Mueller going to expand his investigation into the administration's foreign policy?
Maybe an investigation into the Iran deal? North Korea?

Lmao. This thread isn't even about Donald Trump. Neither was the last one. Or the one before that. Or the one before that. Or the one before that. Nor
do I even post daily.

Are you in the habit of just making stuff up?

But do you know who does post daily? The same handful of people who contribute multiple posts daily about Obama, who hasn't been President for
almost a year and a half, and Hillary Clinton — who lost the effing election and has Fox News personalities stalking her in the woods.

So spare me this "Trump Derangement Syndrome" bull#. It wasn't clever the first 300,000,000 million times some unfunny wannabe troll said it.

Does it even matter? This is the state of ATS. Nobody is even addressing the OP. It's just a bunch of irrelevant crap and personal attacks against me
for having the audacity to post a thread about a Trump associate — not even Trump himself — on ATS.

Nobody addresses it because the subject is irrelevant in the big scheme of things. If this truly isn’t about POTUS 45, as you claim, then it’s
just about some joe schmoe lawyer who may or may not have done something illegal. Like hundreds of lawyers everyday. Like Michael Avenatti whom
would seem to have a lot more to explain than Cohen, yet you choose to ignore Avenatti’s shenanigans...which would seem to go full circle back to
another posters comment about your potential unhealthy fixation on POTUS 45.

In the end, most people don’t care about Cohen, or at least won’t unless he is evidentially tied to being a “fixer” for POTUS 45. People do
care about Avenatti because he alludes continually to evidence that never materializes, produced $8m of personal wealth out of thin air, and makes
thug-like threats via Twitter when he’s called out on it...all in a misguided effort to bring down POTUS 45 and America.

Special counsel Robert Mueller has withstood relentless political attacks, many distorting his record of distinguished government service.

But there's one episode even Mueller's former law enforcement comrades - and independent ethicists - acknowledge raises legitimate legal issues and a
possible conflict of interest in his overseeing the Russia election probe.

In 2009, when Mueller ran the FBI, the bureau asked Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to spend millions of his own dollars funding an FBI-supervised
operation to rescue a retired FBI agent, Robert Levinson, captured in Iran while working for the CIA in 2007.

Ohhhh noes!
It goes against the set up!
We can't talk about this.... it is an actual Russian oligarch.

The deep swamp is a interesting thing to behold . It must be quite the balancing act to figure out just who you have to throw under the bus . They
have too many things they need to juggle and I don't see them managing it well in the end

originally posted by: Sillyolme
And it's been two years of chaos.
And ... he is going to be impeached. Or he will quit or decide not to run again because Mueller is a pit bull and he's not letting go. And trump is a
crook.

Remember a few weeks ago when trump said McCabe IS Comey. ( after the IG report)
This is the same retarded logic.
Everybody gets put in the same pot and all become stew.
So what one liberal member said becomes the words of every liberal member.
I've seen it and experienced it several times.

Seems someone forgot the required number of votes in the senate to impeach.
It requires 2/3 vote of the senate.
Not happening without a significant crime.
There is not significant crime committed by POTUS.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.