More likely they are funded directly from a three letter organization. Same for Twitter.

11 years, never once turning a profit but can still find investors and money to regularly expand to over 3500 employees.

Assuming each employees makes $45,000/Yr (California living costs) that would mean they need around $160 Million just in employee salary. Not to mention health insurance, taxes, servers, rent, electricity.

Good point, although Amazon is a totally different company, both Twitter and Amazon have their similarities. Amazon wants to destroy dominate the retail sector by leveraging every thing and every one within it's business model, and it's been highly successful at it. It is a very scary company with a voracious appetite and there is almost no sector it has not invaded or plans to invade. Bezos is a sinister figure who seems committed to a larger and larger monopoly on goods Americans consume and depend on. Investors know what the long term goals of Amazon are and they are working together to become the entire country's company store. Total market domination and control. Not hard to imagine a future where Amazon tokens are given to workers, only redeemable at Amazon.

If Amazon's economic footprint is an elephant, than Twitter's economic footprint is a gnat or an ant. But it doesn't matter, because Twitter is not about making anyone money. Twitter is a platform for suppressing free speech, controlling wider narratives and spreading propaganda. Do we know who is investing in Twitter? We know Prince Al-Waleed was. We know George Soros is. Anyone who follows the President on Twitter knows how rigged it is against him. lol It's actually comical that a public company has such an obvious agenda against the sitting President. Think about this, though: Where would the President's message be WITHOUT Twitter? He knows what the fuck is up and so do his enemies.