Andy Green wrote:
> Considering SD boot works fine with Qi the only truly critical block is
> only erase block +0 containing Qi -- 8K of that block is always read at
> boot without ECC anyway AFAIK. So we're talking about protecting 2/3rds
> of the bootloader with ECC... I think it's acceptable risk until someone
> shows failure from this, not to mention the ECC support itself will
> increase the size of bootloader and risk of bit error.
I was more thinking of the case when booting the kernel or boot GUI
from NAND on GTA02. There, a lot more blocks are involved ...
- Werner