I'm 33 and I would do that right now if somebody dared me. I wouldn't even need $5 or whatever, I would just do it because I have never done it, and I am immature and that sounds just as fun now as it did when I was 8.

Why Would I Read the Article:I'm 33 and I would do that right now if somebody dared me. I wouldn't even need $5 or whatever, I would just do it because I have never done it, and I am immature and that sounds just as fun now as it did when I was 8.

I was just trying to figure out a way to get my sleeve "caught" so that I could ride through screaming like a maniac and get away with it.

What does it connect to, a U.S. metro area that's home to more than one race?

"International Airport" just means that is has architectural features necessary for customs & passport control. It does not mean that there are any flights currently scheduled or that there are INS staffers permanently assigned there.

What does it connect to, a U.S. metro area that's home to more than one race?

My best guess is that it's a seasonal route. Don't see anything international on the website. Sometimes these routes cycle in and out based on travel demand, which I would assume is low when winter hits in Canada...

Lord knows I got bumped in Peru because I unwittingly tried to fly out of Lima the day before most South American carriers suspended their North American services. Which worked out poorly. Many of these smaller Northern airports have regional carriers who fly a once-weekly route to smaller cities in Canada on some tub like a Beechcraft 1900. Don't know if the practice is still common. The regional market has seen a pretty harsh culling in the past few years.

The first one is a full-360 assessable device, where the bags are put onto the belt from above or below in the center. You can ride around and around, and while you would be a dumbass, you aren't a security risk.

The second type is older, and is a single belt loop that goes between the bag claim and the back-of-house area where the bags are loaded onto the belt. The key point is, the belt itself passes between non-secure (public) side and the secure side.

This dumbass from TFA was of the second type, and didn't get off the thing before it passed through the wall and thus created a security breach. Which is pretty much the reason bag belts like this aren't installed that much anymore (and never in new buildings).

The first one is a full-360 assessable device, where the bags are put onto the belt from above or below in the center. You can ride around and around, and while you would be a dumbass, you aren't a security risk.

The second type is older, and is a single belt loop that goes between the bag claim and the back-of-house area where the bags are loaded onto the belt. The key point is, the belt itself passes between non-secure (public) side and the secure side.

This dumbass from TFA was of the second type, and didn't get off the thing before it passed through the wall and thus created a security breach. Which is pretty much the reason bag belts like this aren't installed that much anymore (and never in new buildings).

What's stopping someone from walking in off of the street and placing an unscreened bag on that belt? Nothing. Also, it's not very old. That one you're showing is from (Reagan) National Airport here in DC and it was built in 1997.

Seems stupid to make the area behind that wall part of the "secure zone".

The first one is a full-360 assessable device, where the bags are put onto the belt from above or below in the center. You can ride around and around, and while you would be a dumbass, you aren't a security risk.

The second type is older, and is a single belt loop that goes between the bag claim and the back-of-house area where the bags are loaded onto the belt. The key point is, the belt itself passes between non-secure (public) side and the secure side.

This dumbass from TFA was of the second type, and didn't get off the thing before it passed through the wall and thus created a security breach. Which is pretty much the reason bag belts like this aren't installed that much anymore (and never in new buildings).

What's stopping someone from walking in off of the street and placing an unscreened bag on that belt? Nothing. Also, it's not very old. That one you're showing is from (Reagan) National Airport here in DC and it was built in 1997.

Seems stupid to make the area behind that wall part of the "secure zone".

Doubtful that the bag will have the ability to move itself from the conveyor belt into an airplane without human intervention.