From: "Michael A. Smith" <michael@iammichael.org>
> > > > However, I currently like what is outlined above. Any further
> > > > views? Does it
> > > > need a vote? And if not, can we record this discussion in a readme
or
> > > > something so it is clear to developers as to what the
> > > > convention is?
> >
> > I'm not sure we need to take a formal vote. Everyone participating on
> > the mailing list seems to agree (either implicitly by not saying
> > anything or with explicit approval). I'll commit it into CVS tonight
> > and if anyone objects, they can just -1 my patch and we'll see if we can
> > address the reasons for the veto.
>
> I didn't get to formatting all the naming conventions into a suitable
> format for checking into CVS. Spent too much time trying to figure out
> why tests were failing in JDK 1.2, but not in 1.3 and 1.4 (see the
> commit message a couple of minutes ago).
>
> I'll get to it, just not today.
I'm assuming you were referring to the document, not the changes to the
code. Any problems with me becoming a committer to collections making the
changes to PredicateUtils and LazyCollections to bring them in line?
Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>