Help

Helpdesk

Dear Drugs-Forum readers: We are a small non-profit that runs one of the most read drug information & addiction help websites in the world. We serve over 4 million readers per month, and have costs like all popular websites: servers, hosting, licenses and software. To protect our independence we do not run ads. We take no government funds. We run on donations which average $25. If everyone reading this would donate $5 then this fund raiser would be done in an hour. If Drugs-Forum is useful to you, take one minute to keep it online another year by donating whatever you can today. Donations are currently not sufficient to pay our bills and keep the site up. Your help is most welcome. Thank you.

MARIJUANA REFORM TO TAP GRASSROOTS

A Bumper Crop of Initiatives Addressing Marijuana Policy and Enforcement
Will Appear on Various State and Municipal Ballots.

Few domestic policy issues enjoy such deep-rooted public support as marijuana law reform; in particular the legalization of medicinal pot for
seriously ill patients. Yet despite nationwide polls indicating that some
eight in 10 Americans back reform, politicians at the state and especially
federal level continue to oppose even minor changes in existing policy, as
evident by Congress' refusal to hold hearings on a pair of proposed bills
seeking to exempt state-authorized medical marijuana patients from federal
arrest and prosecution.

As a result of this chasm between the public and their elected officials
regarding pot policy, proponents of reform have in recent years taken the
issue directly to the voters via statewide and local ballot initiatives -
most notably, passing laws in Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Nevada,
Oregon and Washington exempting qualified patients from criminal
prosecution for the possession and use of medicinal marijuana when such use
is recommended by their physicians.

This November's presidential election will be no exception, as a bumper
crop of initiatives addressing marijuana policy and enforcement will appear
on various state and municipal ballots. Below is a summary of the more
prominent marijuana law reform proposals.

Statewide Initiatives

Alaska - If approved, Alaska's Cannabis Decriminalization and Regulation
Act ( color=#0000ffhttp://www.alaskahemp.org/ ) would mandate that "persons 21 years or
older shall not be prosecuted, be denied any right or privilege, nor be
subject to criminal or civil penalties for the possession, cultivation,
distribution, or consumption" of marijuana for medicinal, industrial or
recreational purposes. The proposal also encourages the state legislature
to establish a system to regulate pot "in a manner similar to alcohol or tobacco."

Nevada - If approved, the Regulation of Marijuana Amendment (
color=#0000ffhttp://www.regulatemarijuana.org ) would remove criminal and civil
penalties for "the use or possession of one ounce or less of marijuana by a
person who has attained the age of 21 years," and direct the state
legislature to "provide by law for a system of regulation for the
cultivation, distribution, sale, and taxation of marijuana."

INITIATIVE STATUS: Campaigners failed to turn in enough valid signatures to
qualify the Regulation of Marijuana Amendment for the Nov. 2, 2004 ballot.
Petitioners are presently challenging the Secretary of State's vote count.

Oregon - The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (aka OMMA2) (
color=#0000ffhttp://www.yeson33.org ) seeks to amend the state's existing medicinal marijuana law to allow qualified patients to legally possess up to ten marijuana plants at any one time and one pound of usable marijuana. The
proposal would also allow state-certified nurse practitioners and
naturopaths to recommend marijuana to their patients, and expand the
definition of a qualifying medical condition to include "any other medical
condition for which, in the determination of the attending physician, the
medical use of marijuana would be beneficial." The proposal also mandates
the state legislature to promulgate rules to license and regulate medical cannabis dispensaries "to ensure that medical marijuana is available to
qualified patients."

Oakland, California - If approved, the Oakland Cannabis Regulation and
Revenue Ordinance ( color=#0000ffhttp://www.yesonz.org/ ) would establish new municipal
guidelines directing the Oakland Police Department to make the enforcement
of minor marijuana offenses by adults the city's "lowest law enforcement
priority." The proposal also mandates the city of Oakland "to tax and
regulate the sale of cannabis for adult use, so as to keep it off the
streets and away from children and to raise revenue for the city, as soon
as possible under state law."

Tallahassee, Florida - The Practical Law Enforcement Amendment (aka the
PLEA) seeks to amend the Tallahassee city charter to mandate Tallahassee
Police Department to make the "investigation, arrest and prosecution of marijuana offenses [involving possession of under 20 grams], ... the city's
lowest law enforcement priority."

INITIATIVE STATUS: Campaigners are still awaiting a final announcement from
city election officials regarding whether the Practical Law Enforcement
Amendment has qualified for the Nov. 2, 2004 ballot.

Ann Arbor, Michigan - If approved, the Ann Arbor Medical Marijuana Act (
color=#0000ffhttp://www.aammi.org/ ) would amend the Ann Arbor city charter to allow
qualified patients to possess and cultivate marijuana for medicinal
purposes under the authorization of their physician. The proposal would
mandate "no incarceration, probation, nor any other punitive or
rehabilitative measure" for qualified patients, and establish an
"affirmative defense to prosecution" when marijuana is possessed for
medicinal purposes.

Detroit, Michigan - The Detroit Medical Marijuana Act (Proposal M) seeks to
amend the Detroit city criminal code so that local criminal penalties no
longer apply to any individual "possessing or using marijuana under the
direction, prescription, supervision, or guidance of a physician or other
licensed health professional." The proposal also eliminates criminal
penalties on the use and possession of marijuana-associated paraphernalia
devices by qualified patients.

Minneapolis, Minnesota - If approved, the Minneapolis City Charter
Amendment ( color=#0000ffhttp://www.cohr.org/ ) would amend the Minneapolis city charter
"to require that the City Council shall authorize, license, and regulate a
reasonable number of medicinal marijuana distribution centers in the city
of Minneapolis as is necessary to provide services to patients who have
been recommended medicinal marijuana by a medical or osteopathic doctor
licensed to practice in the state of Minnesota to the extent permitted by
state and federal law."

INITIATIVE STATUS: The Minneapolis City Council has refused to place the
Minneapolis City Charter Amendment on the Nov. 2, 2004 ballot - arguing
that the proposal fails "to relate to the general governance of the city."
Petitioners have announced plans to legally challenge the Council's decision.

Columbia, Missouri - Columbia voters will decide on a pair of initiatives
this November: the Missouri Smart Sentencing Initiative, and the Missouri Medical Marijuana Initiative. If approved, the Missouri Smart Sentencing
Initiative would amend the Columbia city criminal code to reduce
misdemeanor penalties on the possession of marijuana and/or paraphernalia
to a fine-only offense of $250. The Missouri Medical Marijuana Initiative
would amend the Columbia city criminal code so that "adults who obtain and
use marijuana and/or marijuana paraphernalia for medical purposes pursuant
to the recommendation of a physician shall not be subject to any arrest,
prosecution, punishment, or sanction." Both proposals mandate that all
cases involving either the misdemeanor possession of marijuana or the
medicinal use of cannabis be referred only to the Municipal Prosecuting
Attorney.

Share This Article

Comments

Sort Comments By

Very interesting and good to hear. I don't have extensive political knowhow, but initiatives are made by the people if memory serves. How do the people go about getting these reforms on the ballot? Where swim lives most of the state and local officials oppose marijuana reform without so much as a consideration, yet the majority of the public tolks up. I was wondering if anyone knew how exactly one could go about setting up such an initiative. I feel there are many people who feel this way, yet don't know much of anything about the current "political" system. Thanks.

You need to get a petition of x number of signatures to start an initiative at state level. There have been some political machinations over federal level initiatives and I don't think any of them have taken place at that level, although there was something about Mike Gravel finding a way to get a federal initiative going without congressional approval.

Thanks, that was pretty vital information to my plan. Do you know if the x, the number of signatures needed, is a constant number, a coefficient of the current population, or if there is a website somewhere that would have this type of information.

Also, this has been festering in my head for a while. There are many groups such as the something for sensible drug policy, MAPS, and NORML, among others, which advocate the legalization of marijuana and support reform of its current legislature. Do you happen to know if for example a local initiative were to be founded, if it would have the ability to gain support form such groups. It seems as if the people fighting for this are somewhat separated, and perhaps if there was a way to connect them all something greater could be done.

This question has more to do with this forum as a whole. I do not know if drugs-forum.com has any affiliates or sister-sites or anything of the such. If it does, and they are perhaps related somehow, perhaps such measures as this could be combined somehow. If such a thing does not exist, or is inadvisable for some reason, forget I even asked.

Also, totally unrelated but, couldn't we (well, the site) get funding of some sort form one of those pro-reform or psychoactive application groups. I mean ya have to figure this site is basically a place where individuals can come and discuss drugs, myths surrounding them, applications, legalities and consequences, without the interference of big media. It seems that would be in the best interest of those groups anyway, and would provide the site with additional (and from what I hear much needed) resources. I don't know anything in those type of regards with this site, and for all I know we already are, but it just seemed like a good idea and I'd be remiss if I didn't mention it. Thanks again.

Another thought came to mind. Would it be better to start a new thread for people who want to be active in this way, but are not sure how or what to do. It just seems most of the proponents just don't have enough time to spend searching through places to find a way to be helpful, especially for a moral cause that won't help pay the bills, or invade the precious downtime. I think if this were done it may help make people who feel obliged to help but lack the time or knowhow an opportunity to do more. If this contradicts the site, or any rules, I'll do no such thing, but I'm pretty sure it would be in accordance with the rules. Just bein safe. Thanks, -OccularFantasm

Thats exactly the lines I was thinking about, thanks. I'll read all that stuff then do, well something, I'll probably have a better idea once I've finished reading it. I don't know why i didn't just do a search for such things, in retrospect it seems like common sense.