[19:09] <@Suzon> IMPORTANT PART BELOW DON'T INTERRUPT YET [19:09] <@Suzon> He will travel time

[19:09] <@Suzon> He has to [19:09] <@Suzon> in order for his father to go away

[19:09] <@Suzon> So when he is in the latest timeline

[19:09] <@Suzon> everything is askew

[19:10]<@Suzon> but when he goes back in time

[19:10] <@Suzon> Everything becomes more normal"

[2012-07-26 20:11:07] <Suzon> He will travel time

[2012-07-26 20:11:07] <Suzon> He has to

[2012-07-26 20:11:07] <Suzon> in order for his father to go away

[2012-07-26 20:11:07] <Suzon> So when he is in the latest timeline

[2012-07-26 20:11:07] <Suzon> everything is askew

[2012-07-26 20:11:08] <Suzon> but when he goes back in time

[2012-07-26 20:11:08] <Suzon> [20:10] Everything becomes more normal

[2012-07-26 20:11:11] <Suzon> or not

[2012-07-26 20:11:12] <Suzon> xD

[2012-07-26 20:11:31] <MateyY> He needs to cry at the end

[2012-07-26 20:11:35] <Suzon> yes

[2012-07-26 20:11:38] <MateyY> He needs to despise himself

[2012-07-26 20:11:44] <Suzon> a tear will start to break the paradox

[2012-07-26 20:11:50] <MateyY> Correction: it would be normal that he does

[2012-07-26 20:12:01] <MateyY> And he will realize

[2012-07-26 20:12:11] <Suzon> the tear will stop him from going back ni time again

[2012-07-26 20:12:11] <MateyY> That only through his spilled blood will he be able to end it all

[2012-07-26 20:12:16] <Suzon> Yes

[2012-07-26 20:12:37] <Suzon> (E \rightarrow (I \land R)) (Premise: If a person is excused from flying (E) because of mental illness, that must be because he is both insane (I), and requests an evaluation (R));

[2012-07-26 20:12:37] <Suzon> (I \rightarrow \neg R) (Premise: If a person is insane (I), he should not realize that he is, and would have no reason to request an evaluation)

[2012-07-26 20:12:37] <Suzon> (\neg I \lor \neg R) (2, Definition of implication: since an insane person would not request an evaluation, it follows that all people must either not be insane, or not request an evaluation)

[2012-07-26 20:12:37] <Suzon> (\neg (I \land R)) (3, De Morgan: since all people must either not be insane, or not request an evaluation, it follows that no person is both insane and requests an evaluation)

[2012-07-26 20:12:37] <Suzon> (\neg E) (4, 1, Modus Tollens: since a person may be excused from flying only if he is both insane and requests an evaluation, but no person can be both insane and request an evaluation, it follows that no person can be excused from flying for reasons of insanity)

[2012-07-26 20:12:44] <Suzon> READ THAT^^^^^^

[2012-07-26 20:13:11] <MateyY> HAPPY ENDING LOVERS; HERE IS YOUR PART: After he dies, we can have a few moments of him being in a normal family

[2012-07-26 20:13:22] <MateyY> * Being in his family, everything normal

[2012-07-26 20:13:28] <MateyY> * Being with his family

[2012-07-26 20:13:42] <Mageddon725> I'm okay with him dying, but the paradox needs to be stopped, that's all I ask

[2012-07-26 20:13:46] <Suzon> Yes

[2012-07-26 20:13:48] <Suzon> It will

[2012-07-26 20:13:50] <MateyY> So after he dies in the paradox, he is given another chance to make things right

[2012-07-26 20:13:51] <Suzon> by his death

[2012-07-26 20:14:12] <Suzon> OK BUT ON TO A NEW TOPIC

[2012-07-26 20:14:13] [INFO] Messages Cleared.

[2012-07-26 20:14:21] <Suzon> How many chapters will we do?

[2012-07-26 20:14:48] <Suzon> We need to do a lot in order to reveal it is a paradox

[2012-07-26 20:14:53] <Suzon> or it will seem random

[2012-07-26 20:15:39] <Suzon> Anybody?

[2012-07-26 20:15:40] <MateyY> It will be kind of psycho

[2012-07-26 20:15:54] <MateyY> We can't change that

[2012-07-26 20:15:55] <Suzon> We shoud do around 20 chapters

[2012-07-26 20:16:27] <Suzon> Oh and by the way; We won't be able to do a sequel if he commits suicide

[2012-07-26 20:16:28] <MateyY> So that means 2-3 chapters per person

[2012-07-26 20:16:32] <Suzon> Yes

[2012-07-26 20:16:49] <MateyY> Well, if it's a complete story by itself, why make a sequel?

[2012-07-26 20:16:55] <Mageddon725> 2 per person (almost) one to introduce their character and begin their section, and 1 later when the action has heated up

[2012-07-26 20:17:04] <Suzon> Yes

[2012-07-26 20:17:10] * Suzon will do 3

[2012-07-26 20:17:11] <AvatarRokusGhost> I'm not sure the amount of chapters matters as much as the order they go in/when events take place

[2012-07-26 20:17:25] <Suzon> We need to alternate times

[2012-07-26 20:17:35] <wordbender_> I think we should plot the story, and *then* decide how many chapters it needs.

[2012-07-26 20:17:39] <Suzon> between kid tiem; and adult time

[2012-07-26 20:17:43] <Suzon> OKAY

[2012-07-26 20:17:43] <AvatarRokusGhost> I agree with WB

[2012-07-26 20:17:57] [INFO] Messages Cleared.

[2012-07-26 20:18:02] <AvatarRokusGhost> The first chapter introduces the characters to each other

[2012-07-26 20:18:08] <AvatarRokusGhost> Does anyone want to do that?

[2012-07-26 20:18:12] <AvatarRokusGhost> Thats after the prologue

[2012-07-26 20:18:31] <Suzon> I think Omar would be good at that

[2012-07-26 20:18:37] <MateyY> All need input on that

[2012-07-26 20:18:42] <MateyY> That's the base of the characters

[2012-07-26 20:18:43] <Suzon> He is good at caputuring personalities

[2012-07-26 20:18:48] <Suzon> Omar067?

[2012-07-26 20:18:54] <Suzon> What do you think?

[2012-07-26 20:19:03] <MateyY> If a character is introduced incorrectly, the whole story may not be represented correctly.

[2012-07-26 20:19:12] <MateyY> Whoever does the first chapter must be very careful.

[2012-07-26 20:19:16] <Suzon> Half of the time

[2012-07-26 20:19:20] <Suzon> the characters

[2012-07-26 20:19:23] <Suzon> personalities

[2012-07-26 20:19:25] <Suzon> need to be

[2012-07-26 20:19:26] <Suzon> askew

[2012-07-26 20:19:28] <Suzon> a bit

[2012-07-26 20:19:39] <Suzon> To reveal paradox

[2012-07-26 20:19:43] <wordbender_> I suggest practicing with Character Conventions before attempting to write others characters.

[2012-07-26 20:19:53] <Omar067> I'm not confident with doing the first chapter.

[2012-07-26 20:20:00] <MateyY> Good :)

[2012-07-26 20:20:08] <Suzon> Well, hoabout this

[2012-07-26 20:20:10] <Suzon> We can

[2012-07-26 20:20:13] <Suzon> all do two

[2012-07-26 20:20:19] <Suzon> and co-write

[2012-07-26 20:20:23] <Suzon> the extras

[2012-07-26 20:20:32] <Suzon> and thatwill allow us

[2012-07-26 20:20:37] <MateyY> Could do if any of us have enough time and are good at sharing

[2012-07-26 20:20:40] <AvatarRokusGhost> wordbender_: how should we collectively go about that?