Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Truth

Another old rule-of-thumb of mine. If something has to be
given a wonderful-sounding title, there is a good chance that it is more sales
job than actuality.Thus, organizations
or legislation with peace, justice, or fairness in their names should be held
at arm’s length and examined before embrace.This is especially so for the word “truth.”If you see a book entitled The True History of the Catholic Church,
the best you can hope for is a one-sided history.Probably, not even that. Or “The True Cost of Obamacare,” may not – how
shall we say this? – follow generally-accepted principles of accounting. When
of my patients starts an answer “Can I be honest with you?” it is a tell that
they are about to say something self-serving they know others might not like,
but expect to be unchallenged.

“Truth” is a large word, and people using it lightly,
without embracing the responsibility for it, are likely not being all that
honest with themselves.They are unable
to make the more modest claim that they are presenting another side, or
information you may not have.Why are
they unable to do that? There are instances where one might legitimately say this is true.I saw it…I know it…I proved it… But those
things invite evidence rather than merely assert.

Items which advertise themselves as true or just may indeed
include a great deal of things worth knowing or acting on. Very occasionally,
they may be largely true or just.But
red flags should go up when you see the words.

Christopher - another wonderful example. People often use that when they are trying to unsay something even as they are saying it. As in "Let me be clear. I have no sympathy for hamster-torturers. However..."