That's why I think most of John's posts are actually done by a spambot program and not even a real person. Honestly a bot program could do exactly the same thing.

Mr Smartypants wrote:

<quoted text>Ahh, still posting the same tired crap over and over and over and over and over again like some schizophrenic with OCD. In the name of Satan, I COMMAND you to obsessively post your idiotic ramblings until Doomsday, Fool, and YOU WILL OBEY.

Well eating a sheep is not acceptable compared to what the bible writers did to their sheep.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>Again, here is my accountable position.1. If god exists, there is evidence for his existence.2. There is no evidence for god's existence.3. There is no god.Copy/paste it this time.<quoted text>Which are you? Conservative or freethinker?<quoted text>I ate a sheep? A whole one? So, you are saying eating meat is the killing of the most innocent? Are you a vegan?<quoted text>Stump John, ask him to provide any evidence of god's existence.

If Rose had a conscience there would be evidence of one.There is no evidence Rose has a conscience.Rose has no conscience.Once again Rose I don't care what you don't believe. I don't accept conservativism and freethinking are either or.Your forum Rose. How does a freethinker put limiting paramaters on evidence they have no example of evidence for?How does Rose quantify the following possibilities: always was, prime mover, something from nothing. You have never explained your methodology for evidence Rose.Why don't we just debate the evidences and reasons you believe in ????? vs a prime mover. Go ahead and avoid any debate or accountability. It's your forum being exposed.Still nothing from the agenda driven antitheists. Who else tries to advance nothing day after day year after year. Rose claims she simply doesn't believe. Suuure.

Blah blah blah. I know you won't read this so I'll just make a lot of ad homs against you anyway. You are a piece of refuse, a pile of dung that has been chewed up by a mule the spat back upon the ground to be trampled by the swine. You are a disgusting pervert, full of dreams for things best not mentioned. You are a monster who would do anything, even kill, to protect your own lies. Prove one of my assertions wrong and answer this one question: When did you stop beating your sister? If you answer that question then you at least prove that you read other people's posts. If not, then I have proven you are just a troll.

That's why I think most of John's posts are actually done by a spambot program and not even a real person. Honestly a bot program could do exactly the same thing.<quoted text>

That's kinda what I think. Either a spambot or somebody doing a psychological experiment. However, having had some experience with schizophrenics, I've learned that some of them are very, very repetitive and not really capable of a real two-way conversation. I'll bet some of these loonies think this is some sort of religious duty like the Catholic crazies who used to post thank-yous to St. Jude in the local newspaper for several days in a row.

And John Spambot reminds me of another bit of wisdom: you can never win an argument against somebody who is too stupid or delusional to realize they've been refuted. It actually takes a certain amount of wisdom to actually lose an argument. That's why fanatics and crazy people of all stripes always *win* arguments--at least in their own minds. In other words, it's pointless to try to reason with a shambling wreck of a mental case like John--if he's human--all you can do is shake your head and be glad you're not schizophrenic like he is.

If Rose had a conscience there would be evidence of one.There is no evidence Rose has a conscience.Rose has no conscience.

If you understood logic, you wouldn't be a fundie.I've tried to explain why your "argument" fails.Starting with your first point, it could be quite possible that I have a conscience, yet thee be no evidence of one. Strike one!This post is evidence that I have a conscience. Strike two!Since both of your points are wrong, your conclusion is wrong. Strike three!Yer out!

John wrote:

Once again Rose I don't care what you don't believe. I don't accept conservativism and freethinking are either or.

Well, your posts go against that statement!

John wrote:

Your forum Rose. How does a freethinker put limiting paramaters on evidence they have no example of evidence for?

Was that supposed to make sense?

John wrote:

How does Rose quantify the following possibilities: always was, prime mover, something from nothing. You have never explained your methodology for evidence Rose.

We haven't gotten that far along in the debate yet...Do you agree that if god exists, there is evidence of his existence?

John wrote:

Why don't we just debate the evidences and reasons you believe in ????? vs a prime mover. Go ahead and avoid any debate or accountability. It's your forum being exposed.

Again, stupid, I've posted my accountable position MANY times.

John wrote:

Still nothing from the agenda driven antitheists. Who else tries to advance nothing day after day year after year. Rose claims she simply doesn't believe. Suuure.

<quoted text>If you understood logic, you wouldn't be a fundie.I've tried to explain why your "argument" fails.Starting with your first point, it could be quite possible that I have a conscience, yet thee be no evidence of one. Strike one!This post is evidence that I have a conscience. Strike two!Since both of your points are wrong, your conclusion is wrong. Strike three!Yer out!<quoted text>Well, your posts go against that statement!<quoted text>Was that supposed to make sense?<quoted text>We haven't gotten that far along in the debate yet...Do you agree that if god exists, there is evidence of his existence?<quoted text>Again, stupid, I've posted my accountable position MANY times.<quoted text>LOL. What do you think is my "real" motivation is?

You actually got a reply from Shithead John that wasn't a tired repetition of the same 3-4 posts he's been spamming for the last several years???

Wow, I guess that rules out a spambot. Guess that means he's just a garden-variety schizo religious nutcase. Don't bother arguing against him though--just like any other fanatic, he never *loses* an argument...

Well he could still be using a spambot but then occasionally jump in and say something besides what te program states.

Mr Smartypants wrote:

<quoted text>You actually got a reply from Shithead John that wasn't a tired repetition of the same 3-4 posts he's been spamming for the last several years???Wow, I guess that rules out a spambot. Guess that means he's just a garden-variety schizo religious nutcase. Don't bother arguing against him though--just like any other fanatic, he never *loses* an argument...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.