Profits soar, wages fall in the globalised economy

IN A recent national opinion poll 73% of
respondents were in favour of increasing the top rate of income tax on incomes
of greater than £100,000 from 40p in the pound to 50p. Only 22% were opposed
and even 68% of those in the top 'AB' social grade were in favour.

Peter Taaffe, general secretary of the Socialist Party

The Tories are naturally opposed to these proposals but so too is Labour,
which is now so embedded as a big business party that it dare not even 'trim
the fingernails' of the rich and the capitalists. The Liberal Democrats
demagogically favour the proposal but as a capitalist party are unlikely to
implement it.

Some election pundits are even surprised at this poll result. This just
shows how far removed they are from reality, how little they understand the
simmering discontent which has built up at the vast wealth amassed by the rich
at the expense of working-class people.

The £2 billion-plus profits of Tesco's is just the latest example of the
bonanza enjoyed by big business, not just in Britain but worldwide. Even the
august International Herald Tribune (11/4/05) is compelled to admit: "Across
wealthy nations, pay has stagnated and job creation stalled at a time when
corporate profits are soaring."

Across the rich nations - the countries covered by the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - wages have fallen massively.
This is the result of the ruthless application of neo-liberal policies by
Blair and other capitalist governments. Privatisation, downsizing, lengthening
of the working day and cuts in wages are the order of the day while profits
have been boosted massively. From 70% of total wealth 30 years ago, wages as a
proportion of total outlay by companies is now down to 64% (see chart).

Conversely, the loot pocketed by the bosses has soared. The share of
corporate profits in the combined national income of the Group of Seven (G7)
major industrialised countries has "reached an all-time high, according to a
study by UBS Warburg".

Threat to workers

The spokespersons of capitalism brazenly admit: "Globalisation, technology
and the interplay of the two have long worked to erode the bargaining power of
employees in developed countries. Indeed, the main slide in the wage share
occurred between 1985 and 1995." But now the "abundant and cheap pools of
labour are... opening up - to an unprecedented number of sectors - [this] is
taking the phenomenon to another level", said Stephen Roach, chief economist
at Morgan Stanley in New York.

Roach states that wages will be cut further, sending a chill down the spine
of trade unionists: "Globalisation is now accelerating at hyper-speed and
corporations are thinking long and hard about giving higher rewards to workers
at home."

International trade soared to 28% of global GDP last year, compared with
19% in 1991. Moreover, "a whole range of services that were once considered 'untradable'
can easily be provided on the other side of the globe: anything from
accounting and legal services to software programming, engineering and
financial analysis."

The general threat of 'outsourcing' affects all workers: "The pressure on
wages to fall is there regardless of whether they are immediately affected by
outsourcing threats,' said Peter Bofinger, a member of Germany's Council of
Economic Advisers."

High unemployment in France and Germany, for instance, is now held over the
heads of the working class as a whip to drive down wages and conditions and at
the same time the 'relocation' of industry is an ever-present threat.

In Carrefour the French supermarket chain, the jobs done by the workers
today, claims the International Herald Tribune, "cannot be done from Poland or
China, but most of France's 2.8 million jobless could replace [the present
workforce]... Consider Wal-Mart, which pays its employees on average $9.68 per
hour, a rate... too low to feed a family in the United States, yet [it]
reportedly receives 10 applications for each new job it offers."

Markets

But there is another side to the piling up of profits by big business. By
cutting the share that the working class receives, (massively, as these
figures show), ultimately this cuts the market. The ability of working people
to buy back the goods that they produce is therefore undermined by the threat
of an economic recession or slump.

Capitalism can overcome this problem, as it has done in the past period, by
an enormous extension of credit, what Karl Marx called 'fictitious capital',
and a drive by the major industrial powers towards the world market to sell
their goods rather than at home. Germany, for instance, overtook America as
the world's largest exporter last year and yet in the fourth quarter of 2004
its economy shrank by 0.2%, wages fell by 1.5% and the jobless total surged to
a record 5.2 million.

Carrefour plans to open about half of the new stores planned for this year
and next in China. The dangers to the working class are obvious as
globalisation, including an influx of cheap labour from Eastern Europe and
elsewhere, squeezes the living standards and conditions of the working class
of Britain and Europe.

Even some capitalists are worried about this savage cutting of domestic
demand: "If you want to milk the cow you need to feed it," says Bofinger.

There are "certain impassable limits", as Karl Marx explained, to cutting
wages and living standards as a means of boosting profitability, which if
exceeded means that the working class cannot maintain itself, reproduce and
therefore provide future profits for the capitalists. But the individual
capitalists have a short-term perspective, their primary goal is to maximise
profits. Their system is based not on social need but on production for
profit.

Socialist alternative

One of the reasons for this colossal piling up of wealth by the rich
capitalists is the absence of fighting, combative trade unions prepared to
counter the ruthless plans of big business, both on a domestic and an
international scale.

There are limits to the ability of capitalism to expand internationally, as
the workers in the poor countries, including China, begin to organise
themselves, create trade unions and fight for a greater share of the wealth
they create, in the form of wages, etc. Internationally, the trade unions
should come together now to combat the conspiracy of big business against
workers throughout the world.

Common action, for similar wage rates and conditions, for instance in
Europe, is essential. Also vital is to organise immigrant labour into the
trade unions and fight for the rate for the job.

This will mean the pushing aside of pro-capitalist 'moderate' trade union
leaders and their replacement by a fighting, militant trade union leadership
that recognises that only by mobilising the power of the working class is it
possible to stop this process of continual deterioration in the rights and
conditions of the working class.

Neo-liberal policies are creating 'social tension' inevitably triggering a
massive explosion of the class struggle. The first signs of this have been
shown in France and elsewhere in the mighty workers' and students'
demonstrations of the last month.

An additional factor which has allowed the capitalists to ride roughshod
over the working class is the absence of mass radical workers' parties, which
existed in the past. Blair, Schroder and the rest of the ex-social democrats
of Europe and elsewhere have gone over to capitalism lock, stock and barrel.
They are not even prepared to implement a small increase in taxes on the rich.

The socialist does favour a tax on the 'fat cats' income, more substantial
than a mere extra 10p in the pound. But we also recognise that they will
dilute such attacks on their wealth unless the commanding heights of the
economy are taken away from them.

The capitalists no longer think they have to look over their shoulder at
the threat that was posed in the past from mass political organisations of the
working class, so are blatant in amassing opulent wealth.

We have to remedy this situation by beginning now the process, even in this
election, of creating mass organisations, which can challenge the very nature
of capitalist society and prepare for a democratic socialist planned economy.

Tony Blair, as well as Gordon Brown, claims that "things are getting
better". But only for the rich! Capitalism in its 'modern' phase offers
working people a future of cuts in wages, unemployment and all the other
aspects of neo-liberalism which working people are now rejecting.

In this election, the fight is not just for votes but also to ram home the
message to working-class people that ruthless capitalism offers a bleak future
and the need is to prepare for a socialist one.