Fehr would tell the players that the revenue disparity is so massive and that owners don't want to foot the bill for fixing their own mistakes (expansion, CBAs, bad contracts), so they just want to take it out of the players' share; while restricting player mobility to the point where the majority of them are locked in for the duration of their short careers.

How can Fehr tell the players that expansion was a mistake when 30% of the members get paid by so-called new teams?