F-2-F Meeting Status (Update to the Dist. List)

SAZ: we did not get the confirmation for a room,
we passed the 4 week deadline notification
... so we can't have a f2f meeting
... if any room was available we could arrange a sub meeting but it wouldn't
be a formal meeting
... any question on this?

LR: if we still need a room I can check
availability in PUC Rio
... PUC is in the same area although not very close
... PUC campus is in the middle of a rainforest

SAZ: who would be able to make it for such a
meeting? Traffic is quite jammed..

<Vivienne> I'd still like to try

SAZ: any reaction?

<Justin> too hard for me

<Luz> Yes. I agree about the informal
location

MV: since it is an informal meeting we could
arrange it in an informal location

<Vivienne> If we could meet at the hotel
where the conference is, that wuld be good.

<Luz> Ok

SAZ: agree that most people would be around the
conference area; regarding the informal meeting we still need to work

I think we first need an agenda

SAZ: SH would have a better answer on the
overview of the ongoing/forthcoming work
... is there any deliverable that would a candidate for such a meeting?

SH: nothing springs to mind..if we talk about
prioritisation we need the agreement of the group
... maybe we can organise an event so that we can attract new people to the
group
... I think it is a good idea to make it informal
... also, I don't know who is going to ASSETS, in october

Metrics W3C Note Status (Update to the Dist. List)

SAZ: finally, put the latest draft online
... these are already editors draft
... there were some comment by Annika that improved the note
... on the coordination group, we informed that we are going ahead with
this
... the publication steps are going to be taken on the following days

Charter Discussions (10m)

SH: I want to open this to anybody and maybe SAZ
can tell us why a charter exists and which purpose does it have

SAZ: the charter describes the scope and work of
the group shaped as deliverables, milestones…basically why W3C is spending
resources in this. Also it describes the profile of people that might be
interested in joing, dependencies, communication protocols etc
... this is the 2nd charter. We learned a lot in the first charter, the wiki
is fed and there's lots of background work done.
... we need a charter updated, which we agree on. We need the approval of the
W3C so that they agree on devoting resources on the group.

SH: is this all?

SAZ: there might be some thing missing, I'll
recheck

SH: we have to see how the brainstorming
discussions, research topics to discuss will fit
... you got the timelines and milestones last week from me
... does anybody want to say about the charter, especially about new things to
add?

<Vivienne> I'm fine

I guess silence means agreement

SH: I guess silence means agreement
... we will present the charter back to the group through email and it'll be
discussed in the group

SAZ: if people refresh the link above it should
be updated

SH: we will get to a point in the next 5 weeks
that we will discuss this

Mobile W3C Note Status (5m)

SH: the note was taken to the coordination group.
Everything we do there goes very well. People from UAWG and ATWG are very
pleased
... the coord. group has until next week to make comments. Jan Richards
suggested to have the English check, which is not a problem. People do like
this work.
... I expect that for the 23rd next week we will have all the comments and for
the following week we will be able to address these

SAZ: I wonder whether more review is
needed..congratulations for this piece of work

SH: we are getting very good comments back from
various experts

SAZ: it'd be great to make the feedback public
... so that the coord. sees it's been reviewed

SH: definitely

Text Customisation W3C Note Status (5m)

SH: there is still no change, nor update. DS says
"no change on the status of the research note"
... anything to say=