More than ever the United States
electorate are recognizing that the dichotomy between Republicans and Democrats and their
adolescent behavior toward each other is nothing more than ideological acting to fill the
soap opera episodes of tabloid news reporting. This pseudo-news, like pseudo-science, has
swept the country and as a result produced probably the most apathetic electorate of all
time. Ralph Nader writing in the August 25, 1998 issue of In the Public Interest, an
article entitled, "Congressional Oversight" states,

"The November
congressional elections are coming up, and the polls say voters are yawning. Previous
off-year elections have drawn only 38 percent on average of eligible voters to the booths,
meaning that only 6 in 10 bothered to exercise the franchise that early Americans fought
so hard to secure for them.

"This year voter turnout could
reach an all-time low. As the differences between the Republican and Democratic parties
become less and less pronounced, the two seem to be coming into confluence in a single
Corporate Party that wields enormous influence over national economic and regulatory
policies. This fosters widespread voter cynicism. Public debate becomes flaccid. Speeches
are rife with slogans, instead of the spark and resolve really needed to improve American
life."

Nader goes on to say that our
uninvolvement leads to a cynicism that makes us wide open for exploitation by the
corporate-political-party structure, i.e. the one Capitalist party system with two quickly
merging-into-one faces. Readers of Metaphoria will recall past issues of years ago
where the case for such a meld was made on many occasions.

During a British Broadcasting
Corporations (BBC) Worldwide Service program on short-wave of September 6, 1998, one
of the commentators who had spent the past six months living in Baltimore, MD and sending
her son to the local public schools, made the observation that the United States barely
has a democracy. Her observations were based upon the belief that democracy requires an
educated and informed electorate and that the news is entertainment rather than
information. She noted that in the Baltimore area two television stations had dedicated
full-time coverage to the Bill-and-Monica affair while the major issues of the day went
ignored. Further testimony to this lament comes from the fact that that few high school
students can locate Sudan or Afghanistan on a map. Whats worse is that most adults
see Khartoum as an animation by Disney. Yet, most can tell you the color of Monicas
dress and what is on it.

With the reduction in importance of
world events to that of baseline entertainment save for the salacious which gets ongoing
and top billing, the media have marginalized the important and hyped the trivial. While
starving millions in Asia and Africa draw a yawn, MSNBCs Monica and Bill Show has
the audience calling for more popcorn. Sales of hamburgers and fries are up. There is
plenty of time between the testimony of tabloid experts to sell more Mickey Dees.

Positive
Possibilities

Ralph Naders recent comments
however, can be seen in a different and positive light. They could be considered a
call to action. While it is true that electoral apathy places the nation under Corporate
influence and domination, at the same time it offers a rare opportunity for alternatives
to make their point felt and to change the political power balance in favor of the
disenfranchised, that is, toward those whom Nader calls too skeptical to bother and vote.

While the United States as a nation
is tuned out to the electoral process that is supposed to make it great and does not care
about the goings on in politics, a tremendous number of its citizens are following
the Bill and Monica show. In fact, more people have watched the presidents so-called
"I did it" speech than have watched Neil Armstrong step on the moon or the O.J.
Simpson jury reach a not-guilty verdict.

While the U.S. public may find the
minute-by-minute salacious coverage of the presidents life "too much too
take", they nonetheless, tune in to hear the latest update. It is this group, those
that are intrigued enough for whatever reasons about Clintons Oval Office
extracurricular activities but do not vote - if they could be reached - who could easily
place candidates of a third party or independent quickly into the halls of the House or
Senate As they say in Vermont, "When the sun shines ya gotta make hay."
Its time to make political hay.

Pink
and Green

In two very unlikely and disparate
locales there exists the possibility of a multi-colored congressional reality - a reality
that has the opportunity of electing the second non-capitalist party candidate to the
House of Representatives. After which, their could be no turning back.

While some of the more politically
astute electorate have heard of Congressman Bernie Sanders, Independent of Vermont, who,
this year is running for his fifth term in the House, few are familiar with the
possibilities in New Mexico.

In the snow-white landscape of
Bernies Vermont where the Congressman has for over a decade declared his Socialist
orientation, the sand-beiged terrain of New Mexico offers the possibility of the cactus
Green Party candidacies of Carol Miller and Bob Anderson for Congress. Damacio Lopez, a
Green running for Secretary of State is co-author of the March 1993 GAO report,
"Uranium Battlefields Home and Abroad: Depleted Uranium Use by the Department of
Defense."

While Bernie may not have much
difficulty in being re-elected, Miller, Anderson and the Greens are in a hopeful struggle
and are making hay in the desert. In the last two Congressional elections, the Greens
received 17% and 15% of the vote. They did so without spending millions as did the
Capitalist Democratic and Republican Parties. As the Greens of New Mexico put it they,
"have a historic opportunity to end big moneys stranglehold on U.S.
politics."

To do so requires bringing the New
Mexico Greens message into the living rooms and homes of America. Imagine if their
message received even a fraction of the media coverage and attention given to the Monica
Lewinsky matter. With customary Green hard work, some luck and the support of progressives
around the country, the Green team of Miller, Andersen and Lopez can "turn the
political discourse back to the concerns of the ordinary people."

Such
Radicals

The New Mexico Greens are such
radicals! Their audacity is obvious in their plan to limit campaign spending. Andersen
even dares to suggest putting a cap on congressional campaigns equal to the salary of the
office - in this case: $137,000. Miller who suggested a cap of $100,000 spent only $37,000
in her first attempt. She keeps raising the bar each time that the limit is rejected by
the Republican incumbent Bill Redmond. The ideas is to embarrass Redmond by finding out
just what he thinks it takes to buy the seat. Miller believes that a $250,000 cap on
Congressional races is more than reasonable.

In Feudalism alias American
Capitalism, David (no last name Internaut) makes the observation,

"As Congress
increasingly becomes a fraternity of lawyers competing for special interest favors for the
particular economic elite who support them, the distinction between Republican and
Democrat becomes increasingly irrelevant."

It is this distinction, the
irrelevance of two major parties, made manifest in their myriad of Clinton-Lewinsky media
appearances and self-righteous proclamations while at the same time being unable to do the
peoples work, that has the voters thinking about looking in other places. In New
Mexico, this looking somewhere else has the Greens causing the Democrats much concern.

Repetition

Working through the system as an
alternative to the Capitalist parties is difficult. It is after all, the capitalist who
controls the mass media through ownership of the printing presses, radio and television
stations. Recently, I made the comment to JeanneE, wouldnt it be nice if there were
even one nationally available twenty-four hour progressive radio or television station
where commercials would not influence editorial policy and where word of progressive
candidates could be spread without interference.

I can just see it. Imagine Carol
Miller and the New Mexico Greens party-position, platform, news, events and debates
repeated on a daily basis - repeated as often as the clip of Monica and Bill hugging in a
crowd. Imagine Miller, Andersen and Lopez being followed by progressive reporters,
tripping over each other as they give a news conference over question of the morality, not
of the presidents behavior but rather, the launching of seventy-two cruise missiles
into Afghanistan and Sudan (at $2,000,000 apiece). Repetition of coverage is effective. As
Marx might ask, who owns the means of repetition? Alternatives to the global consolidation
of repetition is inexpensively available through alternative technologies. It requires but
the desire to use it. Read on to find out.

Alternative

Why are there no progressive
television or few progressive radio stations across the AM and FM dials? Theres a
simple answer: because the system has created the reality where only the rich or those who
are bankrolled by the rich can afford such a powerful luxury. This is why there is an
explosion of microbroadcasting in the United States.

Microbroadcasters go on the air with
low power and without FCC license (thus illegally) using the argument that the airwaves
belong to the people and not the corporations. They argue that it is a violation of free
speech for only the wealthy to have radio outlets for the expression of their political,
ideological views and community news. I used to think as a ham radio operator of many
years, that these illegal "pirate broadcasters" should be stopped. But, is it
not illegal according to the US Constitution for the FCC to have sold off the natural
resources of the people to the highest bidder? Are not the air waves the property of the
People? Long live microbroadcasting!

When I first moved to Vermont, I
wrote our congressman inquiring about starting a short-wave station called Radio Vermont.
The congressman quickly replied with licensing information from which I found that a mere
$8,000,000 was required to obtain equipment and get on the air with a license. You can see
why I did not proceed with my plans.

Have you ever listened across the
short-wave radio bands? There are literally dozens of right-wing stations espousing a
twisted Christianity which uses religion as a cover for political agenda. There are
stations who believe that the end time in near and is coming in our lifetime. (Ive
often wondered if they buy life insurance policies?) There are stations who try to
convince people to buy gold coins as a hedge against the impending end of our economy and
civil strife. Then, there are the international Catholic stations, Voice of America, etc.

On the left? There is Radio for
Peace International (RFPI) which had to set up shop in Costa Rica on the Campus of the
University for Peace in Santa Anna. Why? Affordability and licensing access. Tune in on
15050 and 6975 kHz daily anytime (best in the evenings after sunset). RFPI broadcasts
Pacifica News, Jim Hightower, Counterspin, UN news and special programs, etc.

Short-wave radio is the
countrys best kept secret. Any evening, there are literally thousands of stations of
that can be heard. Most of the stations are the mouthpieces and the organs of their
respective governments. The vast majority of which are not owned and operated by the
individually rich but, rather, the communications institutions of their respective
countries.

A savvy listener recognizes the spin
of the originator. On short-wave they have the option of many spins! There is Radio
Havana, Radio Netherlands, BBC, Radio Baghdad, Radio Tokyo, Radio Dubai, Radio Canada
International, etc. The list endless.

Listening to short-wave radio is not
expensive. A good quality portable short-wave receiver costs less than a years
subscription to cable or satellite TV. For example, as I write this newsletter, the
Sangean ATS-909 (a well rated unit) is available for under $200. The other manufacturers
are Sony, Grundig, Panasonic. Kenwood, Yaesu, Icom, Lowe, Alinco, AOR and Yupiteru.
Short-wave is one of the best investments in escape from Corporate dominance that one can
make. A better or complementary activity is the complete elimination of television and
commercial radio in the home.

Monkey
Politics

Barring microbroadcasting and
short-wave radio, what do the people have as a tool to respond to the parties of the rich?
They have electoral monkey politics. As an example I cite the Vermont senatorial primary
election of September 4, 1998. Enter Fred Tuttle, Life Magazines rookie of
the year (not what I would consider a noteworthy distinction). The Spread Fred homepage on
the Internet states,

John O'Brien's second film, MAN WITH
A PLAN, continues his unique blending of fact and fiction: he uses the hard Vermont
countryside and his neighbors in Tunbridge, Vermont as themselves in the telling of
made-up stories. This time it's, on the surface, a sweet and funny Capraesque fable of how
Fred Tuttle, a wily old country naif, decides to run for Congress and triumphs in his
hapless simplicity over sophistication, money, and power.

In real life, Fred was on the ballot
running in the Republican primary against a Vermont newcomer with big bucks. Jim McMullen,
a wealthy businessman from Massachusetts was inspired by the Republican National Committee
(RNC) to run against liberal incumbent Democrat Senator Patrick Leahy by using the
turning-of-the-second-home- turned-first-home method of becoming a Vermonter.

Having plenty of financial resources
(he spent $250,000 in the primary) McMullen and the RNC set out to buy the Senate seat. In
response, and in the typical activist Vermont style and response, the voices of opposition
placed 79-year old dairy farmer Fred Tuttle on the ballot. Vowing to spend no more than
$16 on the race, farmer Fred, with the help of many friends, progressives and angry voters
defeated McMullen. Victorious Fred won the election by 10%!

The day after the election, I came
into work to get my daily cup of morning coffee. A colleague who does the same came in and
said, "Democracy sucks!" My reply was, only where the people care enough to stop
the obvious purchase of power, to use monkey political tactics, can they send the message,
"No you wont!" Vermont is such a place.

Conclusion

Vermont and New Mexico (and more and
more others) are prime examples of how small states with dedicated activists are offering
alternatives in spite of rich corporate dominance. The Green of New Mexico, the Pink of
Vermont, the Rainbow of San Francisco and New York, the White of pacifism, etc. through
solidarity can create a national alternative to the parties of the rich. It is taking
place as you read.

The Republican and Democratic
Parties are obsolete. They are decaying and dying by the shear weight of their own
inadequacy, corruption and greed. The Capitalist parties are inconsequential because they
no longer are in touch with the reality of the people that struggle daily to make ends
meet. The parties of the rich elite who know not the cost of daily bread nor milk, nor
health care, nor are they aware of the suffering their stock investments cause around the
world, are slowly coming to the realization that their policies cannot save the planet
from environmental upheaval. In my humble opinion, it is this recognition, this growing
loss of faith in the US dominated global religion of the free and stock markets that is
contributing to the awareness of global economic disintegration.

This November, there will take place
the second convention of the US Labor Party. The Labor Party is an educational
organization of working people: carpenters, teachers, electricians, nurses, musicians,
communications and social workers, miners, and others, who believe that those who produce
the goods and services are at least as important and should have as much political power
as those who own the means of production. This important convention taking place at a time
of crisis in Washington will be held in Pittsburgh.

If articles of impeachment are
presented against president Clinton, look forward the greatest show on Earth coming to
Congress. This event will become a three-ring circus and morality pageant brought to by
the same self-righteous people, who as Woody Guthrie wrote and Billy Bragg sings,
" waste enough to feed the ones who starve build our civilization up
and shoot it down with wars."

Quotes

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich
as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets and steal bread.

Anatole France

I see in the near future a crisis
approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my
country....corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will
follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working
upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the
Republic is destroyed.

Abraham Lincoln

Your silence will not protect you.

Audre Lorde

The country is governed for the
richest, for the corporations, the bankers, the land speculators, and for the exploiters
of labor.

Helen Keller.

When a man tells you that he got
rich through hard work, ask him whose.