This is the White Genocide Evidence Project: contributors will help create a database of evidence documenting the intentional destruction, displacement, and denigration of the White race in all White nations—White genocide. These contributions will be quotations or other evidence, buttressed as much as possible by references, which will eventually be converted into a final product to expose the perpetrators of White genocide. Hundreds of online discussion forums and websites have already compiled immense lists of hateful, slanderous, or genocidal quotations against the White race. The idea is to collect and synthesize these quotations (and any other evidence) into a polished, presentable, unimpeachable, and independent end-product suitable for public dissemination to the population at large.

Many realize the “open borders” movement is a thinly-veiled attempt to dilute and thereby destroy all White nations—Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everybody. White people are libeled and demonized by cultural Marxists in academia, vilified by public slander, and robbed of the right to self-identify all in order to instill a destructive sense of false White guilt. Anti-Whites advance these agendas and claim “the race problem” will disappear if all the White nations assimilate and interbreed with an overwhelming flood of non-White immigrants. These malevolent social engineers yearn for a blended humanity in White nations—mocha-skinned people and societies without race by homogenous default. What they never mention—and what is left to nationalists to publicly emphasize—is that this plan for “diversity” only applies to White nations. If this patent truth were well-recognized, everyone would recognize this scheme as the systematic eradication of the White race—White genocide.

Ideally, the people promoting, financing, conspiring in, and implementing White genocide will be brought to justice before an international genocide tribunal. Additionally, the people and organizations pushing for White genocide can face criminal prosecution or civil litigation in various nations. Countless lawsuits have been filed seeking monetary damages or criminal charges against people, firms, or organizations linked to alleged atrocities of the Second World War or modern ethnic conflicts. In the same manner, the forces responsible for White genocide will attract a cottage industry of lucrative lawsuits seeking monetary redress. Myriad wealthy individuals, endowed foundations, and multinational corporations share complicity in the drive to destroy the White race. These deep pockets are ideal targets for lawsuits. This project can provide the groundwork for a prima facie complaint in international or domestic courts of law.

As stated, the ultimate purpose of this project is to reproduce all of the quotations and evidence into an independent website unaffiliated with any group or faction. It will serve as an objective testament to the persecution and genocide of White people worldwide. This website will be an invaluable resource to awaken others to the existential issues facing the White race. Furthermore, this project will deter many anti-White individuals from engaging in further hostilities against the White race because it will publicize these crimes to the world and increase the likelihood of criminal prosecution and civil litigation.

Please submit direct quotations, written or spoken, that implicate one or more persons, organizations, or governments under the United Nations definition of genocide (see below). Remember the burden of proof is upon the prosecutor or plaintiff; specific details are invaluable. Context, publication details, and verifiable references are all extremely important. If a particular quotation lacks any of these attributes, provide it anyway because others can contribute by filling in the gaps. This is the nature of the project—a worldwide collaboration to create a voluminous, detailed, and well-referenced database of quotations and evidence to implicate agents and organizations responsible for White genocide. Quotations are the easiest to find and thus the primary focus. However, talented and resourceful researchers can submit voting records, corporate policies, lobbying agendas, political agreements, or immigration policies, which are all very helpful. Creativity is encouraged.

The White Genocide Evidence Project: Immigration

This section is dedicated to collecting evidence of White genocide via immigration policy. This is the place to submit comments that pertain to non-White immigration into all White nations and only White nations: “Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everybody.”

Of special concern are legislative actions, inaction or negligence regarding border/immigration enforcement, elected or appointed members of governing bodies, contributors to think tanks that influence public policy, and other such information that can flesh out evidence of the genocidal policy of replacing Whites with non-Whites through immigration, whether legal or illegal.

Please submit evidence using the comment button.

Due to the nature of this category, the submission format will need to be relaxed to accommodate the complexity of the events in question. Creativity and scholarship are encouraged. Nonetheless, please try to conform to the following format:

Ted Kennedy
United States of America
Senator, Massachusetts
Leading proponent of the 1965 Immigration Act
B C D
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

The 1965 Immigration Act reversed the United States of America’s longstanding preference for European immigrants, which existed to maintain the (White) European heritage, identity, and demographics of the nation. For two centuries prior to 1965, American immigration and American population statistics were overwhelmingly White European. The 1965 Act turned this policy of self-preservation on its head and instead favored immense numbers of non-White immigrants.

The results of this policy change are quite clear. In 1965, America was approximately 89 percent White. The latest Census figures estimate the White share of the American population as roughly 65 percent—but this is calculated using an overly-broad definition of “White,” which includes Middle Easterners, mestizos, and other non-Whites who are allowed to simply self-identify as White. As of this writing, a majority of the children under the age of four (living in America) are non-White. In a few more years, White Americans will be a minority population.

Note that Senator Kennedy defended this treasonous and traitorous piece of legislation by stating, “First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same…. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset…. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia…. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think…. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”

This quotation demonstrates deception and malice aforethought because it acknowledges almost every problem predicted by opponents of the 1965 Act, yet simply denies that they will take place. Senator Kennedy knew exactly what the 1965 Act meant for the future of America but he described it as something completely different, all the while sweeping the obvious genocidal, social, economic, and political concerns under the rug.

Henry Louis Gates Jr.
United States of America
Author, documentary filmmaker, Professor at Harvard University
Director of the W. E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research.
C D
Q: What will America look like in our increasingly mixed-race future?
A: I’m looking forward to the time when we all look like Polynesians.
“Questions For Henry Louis Gates Jr. After the Beer Summit,” New York Times, February 11, 2010http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/magazine/14fob-q4-t.html?_r=1

Tim Wise
United States America
Anti-White “diversity” consultant, anti-White polemicist
A B C D
“Because you’re on the endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving…”
“It’s OK. Because in about forty years, half the country will be Black or brown. And there is nothing you can do about it…”
“And they know how to regroup, and plot, and plan, and they are planning even now—we are—your destruction.”
“We just have to be patient. And wait for your hearts to stop beating. And stop they will. And for some of you, real da**ed soon, truth be told. Do you hear it? The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently? Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.”
Mr. Wise’s article not only promotes but gleefully celebrates White genocide, cruelly taunts White Americans about the upcoming deaths of individual American Whites and the larger dispossession of White American society, makes specific references to the physical deaths of White Americans (heartbeats, “tick tock”), and gloats about the growing Mexican invasion into America and displacement of White American culture by using Spanish phrases. After the well-deserved outcry against Mr. Wise’s hateful and genocidal screed, Mr. Wise attempted to cover his tracks by deleting some of the more opprobrious sections. The original is preserved in its entirety at multiple websites, including some listed below.
“An open letter to the White right on the occasion of your recent successful temper tantrum,” Daily Kos, 11/3/2010http://delightsome.wordpress.com/2010/11/05/tim-wise-tries-to-edit-his-hate/http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/11/an_open_letter_2.phphttp://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/2010/11/10/genocide-in-tim-wises-america/
ALTERED VERSION:http://www.timwise.org/2010/11/an-open-letter-to-the-White-right-on-the-occasion-of-your-recent-successful-temper-tantrum/

Mario Obledo
United States of America
Former California Secretary of Health and Welfare
Co-founder of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)
B C D E
“We’re going to take over all the political institutions of California. California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn’t like it should leave. If they [people of European heritage] don’t like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe.”
Interview on radio station KIEV, Los Angeles, California, June 1998.http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/hispanicleaders.asphttp://ccir.net/AUDIO/TakeoverOfAmericaCD/05.mp3”

Samuel Lin
United States of America
A B C
Asian student at the University of California at Berkeley describing what should be done about White men who date Asian women:
“I think we should f — -in’ kill them all. Get your own ladies. Stick to your own flavor.”
Carrie Chang, “White Light,” Monolid Magazine, Vol. 2, No. 1.http://www.amren.com/features/anti-White/hate_speech.html

Leonard Jeffries
United States of America
Chairman of the African-American studies department of the City College of New York
From an interview in the May, 1995 issue of Rutherford magazine):
“Q: But the Black man is no longer a slave.
A: The slave should be waking up, thinking of ways to slit the slave master’s throat …
Q: What kind of world do you want to leave to your children?
A: A world in which there aren’t any White people … “
T.L. Stanclu & Nisha Mohammed, Leonard Jeffries Jr., Rutherford, May 1995, p. 13.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Jeffries

Eldridge Clever
United States of America
Former Black Panther leader
B C D
Describing why he raped multiple White women:
“Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the White man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women …”
Eldridge Clever, Soul on Ice, McGraw-Hill, 1968, p.14.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eldridge_Cleaver

Augustin Cebada
United States of America
Member of the Brown Berets of Aztlan
A B C D E
“…we claim this land as ours, it’s always been ours, and we’re still here, and uh, none of this talk about deporting. If anybody’s going to be deported it’s going to be you.”
“Go back to Simi Valley, you skunks! Go back to Woodland Hills! Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old White people, it is your duty to die.”
“Right now we’re already controlling those elections, whether it’s through violence or nonviolence. Through love of having children we are going to take over.”
Speech given during a rally on July 4, 1996 outside of the Federal Building in Westwood, California
Quoted in Barbara Coe, Reconquista, The Takeover of America, California Coalition for Immigration Reform, 1998, p. 20.http://ccir.net/AUDIO/TakeoverOfAmericaCD/14.mp3http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/hispanicleaders.asp

Malcolm X (Malcolm Little, El Hajj Malik El-Shabazz)
United States of America
Black activist
“The death of over 120 White people is a very beautiful thing.”
Speech in Los Angeles on June 3, 1962 upon learning of a tragic plane crash.
Note: an oft-repeated phrase of Malcolm X’s: “The White man is the devil.” Malcolm X (and others of the Nation of Islam) taught that Whites are devils who were genetically-engineered by someone named “Yakub” thousands of years ago.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakub_%28Nation_of_Islam%29http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0944318/bio

Norman Podhoretz
United States of America
Academic, author, public intellectual
B C D
“His past is a stigma, his color is a stigma, and his vision of the future is the hope of erasing the stigma by making color irrelevant, by making it disappear as a fact of consciousness.
I share this hope, but I cannot see how it will ever be realized unless color does in fact disappear: and that means not integration, it means assimilation, it means — let the brutal word come out — miscegenation. The Black Muslims, like their racist counterparts in the White world, accuse the “so-called Negro leaders” of secretly pursuing miscegenation as a goal. The racists are wrong, but I wish they were right, for I believe that the wholesale merger of the two races is the most desirable alternative for everyone concerned. I am not claiming that this alternative can be pursued programmatically or that it is immediately feasible as a solution; obviously there are even greater barriers to its achievement than to the achievement of integration. What I am saying, however, is that in my opinion the Negro problem can be solved in no other way.”
Norman Podhoretz, essay, “My Negro Problem—And Ours”http://www.lukeford.net/Images/photos/out.pdfhttp://www.slideshare.net/guest910dc9/norman-podhoretz-my-negro-problemand-ours

Paul Kurtz
United States of America
Professor of philosophy at the State University of New York at Buffalo, secular humanist philosopher
B C D
“The highest good, as I see it, is intermarriage between people of different ethnicities, races, religions, and cultures. People who intermarry are contributing to the new human species that is emerging on this planet. You can see it clearly in the United States: in fifty years we will have a non-White majority. This frightens many people. I can see the same changes in the cities of Western Europe…In due course, the majority may no longer be White. I think this is wholesome and good. It is difficult for many people’s nervous system to have this clash of cultures and races, but we ought to encourage the widespread intermingling of people as we reach a civilisation which is beyond ethnic differences.”
Paul Kurtz, “The Limits of Tolerance,” New Humanist, March 1992, Volume 107, No 1, pages 4-6.http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/kurtz_16_1.2.htmlhttp://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/man_who_invented_racism_4.html#note_58

Haunani-Kay Trask
United States of America
Professor of Hawaiian Studies at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, poetry writer, author
A B C D
“Racist White Woman
I could kick
Your face, puncture
Both eyes.
You deserve this kind
Of violence.
No more vicious
Tongues, obscene
Lies.
Just a knife
Slitting your tight
Little heart.
For all my people
Under your feet
For all those years
Lived smug and wealthy
Off our land
Parasite arrogant
A fist
In your painted
Mouth, thick
With money
And piety”
Ryan O’Donnell, “Hate America Professor,” Ryan O’Donnell, Frontpagemag.com, June 25, 2003.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haunani-Kay_Trask

Menace Clan
United States of America
Rap group
A B C
“Ni**as in the church say: kill Whitey all night long … the White man is the devil … the Crips and Bloods are soldiers I’m recruiting with no dispute; drive-by shooting on this White genetic mutant … let’s go and kill some rednecks … Menace Clan ain’t afraid … I got the .380; the homies think I’m crazy because I shot a White baby; I said; I said; I said: kill Whitey all night long … a ni**a dumping on your White ass; f**k this rap sh*t, ni**a, I’m gonna blast … I beat a White boy to the motherfu**ing ground”;
“I kill a devil right now … I say kill Whitey all nightey long … I stabbed a fu**ing Jew with a steeple … I would kill a cracker for nothing, just for the fu** of it … Menace Clan kill a cracker; jack ‘em even quicker … catch that devil slipping; blow his fu**ing brains out
Menace Clan, “Kill Whitey,” “Fu** a Record Deal,” respectively, Da Hood, 1995, Rap-A-Lot Records, Noo Trybe Records, subsidiaries of what was called Thorn EMI and now is called The EMI Group, United Kingdom.

Heat, Jet, and Spice 1
United States of America
Rap collaboration
A B C
“Devils fear this brand new sh*t … I bleed them next time I see them … I pray on these devils … look what it has come to; who you gonna run to when we get to mobbing … filling his body up with lead, yah; cracker in my way; slitting, slit his throat; watch his body shake; watch his body shake; that’s how we do it in the motherfu**ing [San Francisco] Bay … sitting on the dock of the dirty with my AK”
Heat — featuring Jet and Spice 1,” Paris, Unleashed, 1998, Unleashed Records, Whirling Records.

Killarmy
United States of America
Rap group
A B C D
“To all my Universal Soldier’s: stay at attention while I strategize an invasion; the mission be assassination, snipers hitting Caucasians with semi-automatic shots heard around the world; my plot is to control the globe and hold the world hostage … see, I got a war plan more deadlier than Hitler … lyrical specialist, underworld terrorist … keep the unity thick like mud … I pulling out gats [handguns], launching deadly attacks”
Killarmy, “Blood for Blood,” Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, 1997, Wu-Tang Records, Priority Records, The EMI Group, United Kingdom.

Brand Nubian
United States of America
Rap group
A B C D
“Won’t be satisfied until the devils — I see them all dead … my brother is sending me more guns from down South … pale face … it’s all about brothers rising up, wising up, sizing up our situation … you be fu**ing with my turf when you be fu**ing with my race; now face your maker and take your last breath; the time is half-past death … it’s the Armageddon … go into the garage; find that old camouflage … cracker-shooting nightly”
Brand Nubian, “What the Fu**,” Everything Is Everything, 1994, Elektra Entertainment, Warner Communications, Time Warner, USA.

Dr Dre
United States of America
Rapper
A B C D
“Like my ni**as from South Central Los Angeles they found that they couldn’t handle us; Bloods, Crips, on the same squad, with the Eses [Latino gangbangers] up, and ni**a, it’s time to rob and mob and break the White man off something lovely”
Dr Dre, “The Day the Ni**az Took Over,” Dr Dre, The Chronic, 1993, Interscope Records, under Time Warner in 1993.

Ice Cube
United States of America
A B C D
“Bust a Glock; devils get shot … when God give the word me herd like the buffalo through the neighborhood; watch me blast … I’m killing more crackers than Bosnia-Herzegovina, each and everyday … don’t bust until you see the Whites of his eyes, the Whites of his skin … Louis Farrakhan … Bloods and Crips, and little old me, and we all getting ready for the enemy”
Ice Cube, “Enemy,” Lethal Injection, 1993, Priority Records, Thorn EMI; now called The EMI Group, United Kingdom.

Da Lench Mob
United States of America
Rap group
A B C D E
“F*ck them laws, because the Mob is coming raw; ni**a, is you down because it’s the Final Call … grab your gat; know the three will start busting; I’m trying to take them down … the war of wars with no fu**ing scores … April 29 was a chance to realize … the g.’s are out to kill … we got crackers to kill; sending them back in on a ship to Europe … they deserve it … a nation-wide riot across America … this is the Final Call on Black man and Black woman, rich and poor; rise up”
“The crackers ain’t sh*t; chase them out of the jungle; now raise up off the planet … we get the 12 gauge; shot to the chest … we hitting devils up … Da Lench Mob, environmental terrorist … I gripped the Glock and had to knock his head from his shoulders … I got the .30 on the rooftop; pop; pop; so many devils die … make sure I kill them … lynch a thousand a week if it’s necessary”
“We’re having thoughts of overthrowing the government … the brothers and sisters threw their fists in the air … it’s open season on crackers, you know; the morgue will be full of Caucasian John Doe’s … I make the riot sh*t look like a fairy tale … oh my god, Allah, have mercy; I’m killing them devils because they’re not worthy to walk the earth with the original Black man; they must be forgetting; it’s time for Armageddon, and I won’t rest until they’re all dead”
“Dropping verses, casting curses, throwing these hexes on the devils … respect to Farrakhan, but I’m the jungle-don, the new guerrilla, top-ranked honky killer … what do Blacks do; they just keep on blowing devils away … evil fu**ing cracker … I’m tightening up the laces to my steel-toed boots, so I can walk, stomp; we stomp this devil down in the park”
“Swing by on the pale guy … break him in the neck … the guerrilla with the poison tip … shaking pinky up on a dull-*ss ice-pick … this is Lench Mob … devil, what you want to do; when you see the boot, knew your head is hoohoo”
“Grab your deep-ass crews … we gotta make them ends, even if it means Jack and friends … now you’re doomed, hollow-points to the dome; once again it’s on … out comes my .22 … I’m the cut-throat; now I got to cut you … ‘94 is the season for lynching; from out of the dark is the South Central g., ready-hand steady on a bloody machete … a devil is on my shoulder; should I kill it; hell yah … I slice Jack … took an axe, and gave that b**ch, Jill, forty wacks … with my hip hop … it don’t stop, until heads roll off the cutting block”
Da Lench Mob, “Final Call,” “Environmental Terrorist,” “Goin Bananas,” “Planet of da Apes,” “King of the Jungle,” “Cut Throats,” respectively, Planet of da Apes, 1994, Priority Records, Thorn EMI; now called The EMI Group, United Kingdom.
See also:
“Buck the devil; boom … shoot you with my .22; I got plenty of crew; I take out White boys … we got big toys with the one-mile scope, taking Whitey’s throat”
Da Lench Mob, “Buck tha Devil,” Guerrillas in tha Mist, 1992, Eastwest Records America, Elektra, Atlantic, Time Warner, USA.

Ice Cube
United States of America
Rapper
A B C
“Deal with the devil with my motherfu**ing steel [handgun] … White man is something I tried to study, but I got my hands bloody, yeah … I met Farrakhan and had dinner”
Ice Cube, “When Will They Shoot,” The Predator, 1992, Priority Records, Thorn EMI; now called The EMI Group, United Kingdom.

Chuck D
United States of America
Rapper
A B C D
“My own kind blind, brain-trained on the devil-level … chasing down loot, Dole or Newt, who do you shoot … rough stuff to the babies, spread like rabies”
Chuck D, “Ni**ativity … Do I Dare Disturb the Universe,” Autobiography of MistaChuck, 1996, Mercury Records, PolyGram, Philips’ Electronics NV, Netherlands. PolyGram merged within Universal Music Group in 1998, the parent being The Seagram Company, Canada.

The Terrorists
United States of America
Rap group
A B C
“I’m Black with a bat, swinging at the head of a honky … The Terrorists about to murder your ass”
The Terrorists, “Blow Dem Hoes Up,” Terror Strikes: Always Bizness Never Personal, 1991, Rap-A-Lot Records, Priority Records, Thorn EMI, United Kingdom.

Onyx
United States of America
Rap group
A B C
“Waiting for the crackers; smuggle; his mug is in the gutters … so we need your participation in the Caucasian assassination; time is wasting … so who is in association with the ni**er retaliation; it needs your total cooperation … a confrontation will be fought by the younger generation; because we got determination; all we need is organization”
Onyx, “Purse Snatchers,” All We Got Iz Us, 1995, Rush Associated Labels Recordings, PolyGram Group Distribution, Philips’ Electronics, Netherlands.

The following evidence has been submitted and standardized as of March 5, 2011:

EUROPE

Nicolas Sarkozy
France
President of France
A B C D E
“…the objective is to meet the challenge of “métissage” – the challenge of “métissage” that the 21st century is confronting us with. The challenge of “métissage”, France has always been familiar with it, and by meeting the challenge of “métissage” France remains faithful to her history. Moreover, it is consanguinity that has always provoked the end of civilizations and societies.”
“In the course of centuries, France has always known “métissage”, France has always been “métissée.”
“France has crossbred cultures, ideas and histories. France, who was able to crossbreed these cultures and these histories, constructed a universal language, because France herself is universal in the diversity of her origins.”
“Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the last thing: If republican will power does not function, it will be necessary for the Republic to resort to even more forcible methods.”
“It is not a choice. It is an obligation. It is an imperative. We cannot do otherwise at the risk of finding ourselves faced with considerable problems.”
Directs native White Frenchman to miscegenate with foreign non-Whites, and threatens that if miscegenation does not take place soon, there will be punitive or coercive measures in the future to ensure that it does take place.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM-6HWY89Qghttp://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3764http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2008/12/mtissage-now-its-obligation.htmlhttp://cofcc.org/2010/01/french-president-calls-for-totalitarian-anti-White-measures-says-the-french-have-a-duty-to-intermarry-with-immigrates/

Andrew Marr
United Kingdom
BBC Journalist
Describing racial conflict:
“What then can be done? (Apart, of course, from widespread and vigorous miscegenation, which is the best answer, but perhaps tricky to arrange as public policy.) “
“And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilizing instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain ‘natural’ beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too. “
Andrew Marr, “Poor? Stupid? Racist? Then don’t listen to a pampered White liberal like me,” Observer, February 28, 1999, p. 26.http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/1999/feb/28/lawrence.ukcrime4

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
United Kingdom
Ugandan-born British journalist for the Independent Newspaper, affiliated with the Foreign Policy Centre
Referring to the potential loss of a White majority in Britain:
“Only White people worry about this. It’s because for such a long time the world has been their own. To talk about it feeds a particular type of racism that says that Blacks breed like rabbits. There is an underlying assumption that says White is right.”
“There is a White panic every time one part of their world seems to be passing over to anyone else. But it’s foolish to panic about it. So what if we do become a majority? What difference does it make?”
The last days of a White worldhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world
Note: Yasmin is reportedly also to have said the following, on DateLine London, 4th June 2006:
In response to Gavin Essler’s question: “What’s wrong with White guys, by the way?”
Alibhai-Brown replied:
“I don’t like them. I want them to be the lost species in 100 years”.http://www.iamanenglishman.com/page.php?iCategoryId=747&iParentId=689/

Sniper (members: Bachir Baccour, Ryad Selmi, Karl Appela)
France
Rap group
A B C
“We’re all hot for a mission to exterminate the government and the fascists … France is a b**ch and we’ve been betrayed … We fu**ed France, we don’t care about the Republic and freedom of speech. We should change the laws so we can see Arabs and Blacks in power in the Elysée Palace. Things have to explode.”
Sniper, “De Rire aux Larmes,” Warner Music, 2001.
See Homegrown Gangstas, Weekly Standard, Sept. 23, 2005.http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/103uqtmz.asp?pg=1

Anetta Kahane
Germany
Journalist
Founder and chairperson of the Amadeu Antonio Foundation.
B, C, D, and E
Ms. Kahane promotes non-White immigration into every White country in Europe and only into White countries of Europe.
TV interview with RT (formerly known as Russian Today):http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuYKtwnzG7M&feature=player_embedded

Thomas Hylland Eriksen
Norway
Anthropologist at the University of Oslo, Norway
A B C D
“The most important blank spot exists now in deconstructing the majority so thoroughly that it can never be called the majority again.”
Professor Thomas Hylland Eriksen, Culcom, August 27, 2008http://www.culcom.uio.no/english/news/2008/hylland-eriksen.html

Khalid Muhammad (Harold Moore, Jr.)
Former National Assistant to Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam, former leader of the New Black Panther Party
United States of America (but speaking of South Africa)
A B C D E
“If we’re gonna be merciful, we give ‘em twenty-four hours in South Africa to get out of town by sundown. I said if they don’t get out of town, we kill the men, we kill the women, we kill the children, we kill the babies, we kill the blind, we kill the crippled, we kill the crazy, we kill the fa**ots, we kill the lesbians. I said God da**it we kill ‘em all! You say, well why kill them all? Why kill the women? Why kill the babies? They’re just little innocent blue-eyed babies? Because God da**it they’re gonna grow up one day to rule your babies. Kill ‘em now. Why kill the women in South Africa? I said kill the women because the women are the military manufacturing center and every nine months they lay down on their back and reinforcement rolls out from between their legs. So shut down the military manufacturing center by killing the White woman. Why kill the older crackers? The old decrepit crackers in South Africa. How in the hell do you think they got old? They got old oppressing and killing Black people. I say kill [unintelligible stuttering] kill the farmers, kill them all! Kill the fa**ot, kill the lesbians, and after you kill them all? I said that day about Mandela to let you know what he really knows about me don’t know a da**ed thing. I said then you go to the God da** grave and you dig ‘em up! And then you kill ‘em a God da** ‘gain! Because they didn’t die hard enough! And if you don’t have the strength to dig ‘em up after you done all that work, just go to the grave and shoot in the da** grave! Shoot ‘em again, because they didn’t die hard enough!”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztSzoh8N6eshttp://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/18/nyregion/ka-muhammad-53-dies-ex-official-of-nation-of-islam.html?ref=khalidabdulmuhammad

Eduardo Mondlane
Mozambique (former Portuguese colony in Africa)
Leader of FRELIMO (Liberation Front of Mozambique, Portuguese: Frente de Libertação de Moçambique)
A B C
At a lecture at Columbia University in 1962 Eduardo Mondlane told South African MP Helen Suzman he was driving the Whites out of the Portuguese colonies and also said:
“I will go to South Africa to drive the Whites out of there, too.”
Helen Suzman, In No Uncertain Terms, p. 12
Lecture at Columbia University, 1962.

In Race, Ethnicity and Nation, (2007) Peter Wade states that “The impact of genomics on race studies has generated a good deal of controversy, particularly in the U.S.A. The key question has been the old chestnut of whether ‘race’ has any biological reality. Gilroy holds out hope that ‘the meaning of racial difference is being reconstructed by the impact of the DNA revolution and of the technological developments that have energized it’, although he recognizes that ‘genomics may send out the signal to reify “race” as code and information’ and that it will take some work to produce a ‘post-racial’ version of what it means to be human. Foster and Sharp capture the ambivalent results of genomics in a world before that work has been done: ‘It was hoped by some that the sequencing of the human genome would undermine the view that racial and ethnic classifications have biological significance. This position was based on the prospect that by showing that there are numerous genetic similarities across all social classifications and no genetic features that are entirely unique to any particular racial or ethnic population, genomics would provide definitive evidence that race and ethnicity are social, not biological, classifications. Ironically, the sequencing of the human genome has instead renewed and strengthened interest in biological differences between racial and ethnic populations, as genetic variants associated with disease susceptibility, environmental response, and drug metabolism are identified, and frequencies of these variants in different populations reported.’”

Arktos http://www.arktos.com/ has published (2011) the English translation of Democratie: le probleme (1985), a short and excellent book by Alain de Benoiste. The footnotes alone more than justify the purchase of this enticing little volume. Not, it must be added, the ordinary footnotes which plod along the bottom margin of the text: no, there are actually two strata which are cunningly intercalated, translated notes from the original and notes added by the translator. And what notes! A cavalcade of names pours through them like Roland’s army through the valley of the Pyrenees: Herodotus, Churchill, Plato, Mannheim, Pericles, Aristotle, Sorel, de Tocqueville, Hitler, Guenon, and many more, not as gilt on a secondrate essay but as fitting ornament for a superior text.

In order to study ‘genuine’ democracy, it is necessary to turn to Greek democracy rather than to those regimes that the contemporary world wishes to describe by this term…. Returning to a Greek concept of democracy…means re-appropriating…a notion of the people and of community that has been eclipsed by two thousand years of egalitarianism, rationalism and the exaltation of the rootless individual.

The “democracy” of post-Enlightenment regimes is a brutal chimera: “liberalism” and democracy together make a monster. Arbitrarily starting with Max Stirner, we can trace the development of an idea of lonely revolutionary violence through Georges Sorel and Wyndham Lewis to Alexander Dugin: the loneliness here is not that of the liberal “self” but of its opposite, the transcendental subject. Benoist would likely deny that this arc runs through his work; Dugin might approve of the adaptation of his own recent remark:

And all of these critical formulas were embedded in [liberal democracy] from the very beginning. That which is appearing now is the outcome: not the evening of [liberal democracy], but the morning of its horror.

Inbreeding is assumed to have negative effects on fitness, including the reduced ability to withstand immune challenges. We examined the immunological consequences of inbreeding in decorated crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus, by comparing lytic activity, phenoloxidase (PO) activity, and encapsulation ability of crickets from eight inbred lines with that of crickets from the outbred founder population. Surprisingly, crickets from inbred lines had a greater encapsulation ability compared with crickets from the outbred population. We suggest that because inbred crickets have reduced reproductive effort, they may, therefore, have the option of devoting more resources to this form of immunity than outbred individuals.

But that’s not very interesting. Something like this would be more appropriate:

Endogamy in European populations is frequently implied by hostile ethnic actors to be a producer of inbreeding depression. Such depression might be expected to include a reduced immunological response to hostile minorities seeking control of the population’s destiny. We compared immunological response in eight highly inter-related, monoracial populations with that in multiracial populations where exogamy is high. Not surprisingly, members of the monoracial populations displayed greater levels of tradition, self-awareness and ethnocentrism. We suggest that these are the immunological conditions from which said hostile minorities, in misrepresenting endogamy to their hosts, seek to free themselves.

Further, we suggest that endogamy and, therefore, relatedness should be the guiding principle of all European populations in which discussions rage over how to deal with minorities.

Alternate Rights, T-Parties, 3rd Positions and about 700 million Third Worlders in a barrio near you

by The Narrator

This is an assessment (aka, a rant) of where America currently is, circa 2010, and where it is headed, save an asteroid strike. Europe, you’re only a step or two behind.

The first thing to mention, of course, is that America has a black president by the name of Barack Hussein Obama. Let that sink in for a second.

That, in and of itself, is beyond any possible conception of reality most Americans could have imagined in their most grim of nightmares just twenty years ago. Twenty years! That’s 1990!

But then, just twenty years ago (1990!), America was still in the neighborhood of 70 to 75% White. Again, just twenty years ago.

Equally inconceivable to Americans back then, is the notion that everything from customer service over the phone to the directions on a can of soup would be in Spanish as well as English.

Of course some will point out that people were seeing such things in places like Los Angeles or New York and warning of the coming storm. And that’s true. But at that time the clouds on the horizon were not yet in range of 99% of Americans view (America is a big place). By the time they were, the proverbial rains we’re already pounding down.

Besides that, the fact that some were warning of the coming storm twenty years ago (and even earlier) and, well, here we are never the less. It should give us all pause in our feverish excitement about some politician “voicing concern” or some new book explaining the direness of our plight.

On demographics, it’s truly difficult to ascertain the real situation. Officially, America is still over 60% “white” (“white” being those of European, middle-eastern and north African heritage, as per the Census definition). Unofficially the percentages don’t match up with what you see with your own eyes. I’ve gone into this before here, so I’ll only add now that it would be perfectly understandable for a tourist to come to the conclusion that America is about 42% White and 58% non-White. And that’s keeping in mind that in 1965 America was around 90% White, and that all of this has happened without any opposition whatsoever. Not one single leader came forward to oppose the most destructive agenda in human history. Not one!

Whatever the percentages now, it is equally astounding to realize that this was all intentionally engineered on purpose and with effort. This was no natural ebb and flow of circumstances. In short, the demographic transformation of America over the past 40 years is unprecedented in human history. And the reaction of average Americans to all of this has been grumbling acquiescence.

The next point is on the reaction of the right against this engineered destruction of America. Among those laying claim to leadership (or would-be leadership) positions, the reaction has been polite, thought out, informative, reasoned, logical, mature, fact-oriented, measured, respectful, responsible, dignified and various other adjectives denoting a lobotomized personality and generally, if not specifically, attributed to the consistently losing and marginalized side. Facts are of little value in the face of a good argument.

Ironically, this also describes the general approach of the fringe and “far-right” leaders as well. There’s American Renaissance, from which Jared Taylor gives polite, thought out, informative, reasoned, logical, mature, fact-oriented, measured, respectful, responsible, dignified and redundant speeches to, essentially other versions of himself and a few jews. Then there is V-Dare, Stormfront, Chronicles, Taki and other assorted therapeutic sites where confused or trolling Jews and a few Whites can come to vent-via-commentary and agree that “things sure are bad”. They function as a sort of electronic Prozac.

Next up is Alternative Right, that pro-Western gathering place where you can read articles by jews, black women, Indians and Satan-worshipping homosexuals unabashedly discussing race.

Then there are Tea Party gatherings, where upper-middle class White people come together to listen to lower-class black and Hispanic speakers lecture them on the importance of denouncing racism. Oh yeah, and too much government in finances, or something. This movement started off protesting the taxpayer funded ‘Bank Bailouts’ in late 2008. As of mid-2010 the bailouts have long since been instituted and the American government is openly and unabashedly controlling industry and manipulating markets, plunging the economy further into the abyss. And the Tea Party members are still despised and labelled racist by the establishment whose posterior they fight over for the privilege of kissing.

Or, there is the American Third Position Party, which seeks for an equal chair at the table for Whitey. A table Whitey once owned, and which was seated exclusively by Whitey. They’re centered in California, where, I’m told, nearly one-third of the 8 White people who live in that state are members or considering membership.

Their motto might as well be ‘Beggars Can’t be Choosers’.

Then there are the illegal immigration protesters. If they succeed, all 50 million illegal immigrants will have to leave America … then come right back in legally. For this group, the millions of legal immigrants and tens of thousands of refuges being dumped into the American heartland year after year is fine and dandy, even in the face of the ongoing economic downfall and thickening racial tensions. It’s the legality of the issue that concerns them, you see. The paper work, in other words. Having the mentality of anal-retentive bureaucrats, their objections revolve around whether or not every “T” has been crossed and every “I” (and lower case “j”) has been dotted.

And yet these are the same people who mock and decry the justice system that lets a rapist or serial killer go free on a technicality involving improperly filed paperwork.

Then there is the “patriot movement” in general. These useful tools spend restless nights on self-induced nightmares about “jack-booted government thugs” kicking in their doors even as Third World gangs are slaughtering and beheading people in their streets. These are the types who go on about a New World Order and listen to Alex Jones. They actually worry that the government is busying itself trying to conquer an already defeated and powerless people whom they’ve been bullying into submission for over fifty years. This group is also about 99.99999% White, but they proudly assert that race doesn’t matter and that we’re all Americans. Theirs is the “Everybody everywhere is potentially an American” meme. They are, ironically, the most ardent foot soldiers in the cause of a One World Global Order.

It seems that what both ends of the right (far and center) has in common is their willing dependency upon a system that works to harass and ultimately destroy them. If the goals of Richard Spencer, Jared Taylor, James Edwards, William Johnson, Kevin MacDonald, Peter Brimelow and the rest are achieved, then the following is your future:

It’s late summer, 2020 and you’re at home on a typical Tuesday evening and, as usual, sweating profusely in the sweltering summer heat. The fans and air-conditioners are useless because of the rolling blackouts caused by the strain of an additional 200 million people –and counting (added to America since the 1980’s) on the electrical grids. And, naturally, the flak jacket you’re compelled to wear, day and night, isn’t helping.

You consider opening a window, but it’s just too dangerous. Besides keeping the living room window closed helps muffle the noise and “music” the 40 Mexicans next door blast 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Ditto the dining room window on the other side of the house. It helps to slightly muffle the BOOM, BOOM, BOOM the blacks play at their place. Besides, who wants to hear ALL of the screaming and gunshots as the two groups intermittently strive to ambush one another (across your backyard) on a daily basis?

And, as a bonus, by keeping all the windows closed you can barely hear the Muslim prayer calls five times a day. Not to mention that it keeps the smoke out. Yeah, there’s always smoke in the air. If it isn’t from from some riot or gang fight going on somewhere, it’s Detroit everywhere and Devil’s Night every night for the local blacks arsonists.

Even so , closed windows won’t shield your view of the two dead bodies in the street out front: the result of the ongoing Somali vs. Peruvian turf war in your neighborhood. It’s all the worse that they’ve been lying there in the street for two weeks now. There’s no police, no fire department, no nothing – except for the IRS, of course! Death and taxes, you know. And to think, you were once worried about a police state!

Following standard safety protocol, as it’s evening and nearing dark, the wife and kids are huddled together in the basement below. Sure, it’s dark and stiflingly hot down there, but they have a flashlight if they need it and a bucket if they have to go the bathroom.

As you crawl around your house (standing in a home or office just isn’t done – too many random shooters going by), clutching your trusty-rusty shotgun, you happen upon some mail that the US Armed Postal Service delivered this month (they’re back on their usual tri-monthly mail service now!). You come across a newsletter from the Joint Organizations for Keeping English, one of those conglomerations of traditionalist groups who got together in a bunker somewhere and came up with a platform to oppose the outlawing of the English language in the Peoples Republic of North America.

They inform you that, thanks to their lobbying, if you can steal some gas for your Tuk-tuk, sneak out of your favela without getting your throat cut, and find a polling station that has not yet been burnt to the ground or heavily guarded by black, Mexican, Brazilian, Arab, Hindu, Muslim, Native American, Peruvian, Somalian, Iraqi, Iranian, Pakistani, Puerto Rican, Columbian, Venezuelan, Turkish, Hmong, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Thai, Afghani, Chinese, Filipino, Honduran, Nicaraguan, Haitian, or Nigerian thugs, AND IF the voting material is not censored in your area or destroyed or permanently “delayed in transit”, then it is entirely possible, and not beyond the realm of possibility, that your vote may count come this fall….if there are elections this year.

I should mention that jews are not included in the above list because they do not have to control the polling stations. They control the government(s).

Of course, there are times when you have to leave the building. But you don’t just up and walk outside or around your own yard, let alone go down the street or to the market for groceries. Your brother tried that a few months back and his charred body is still hanging off the overpass downtown. Far worse happened to Aunt Jane last year and grandma and a few cousins the year before that. But, hey, that’s just life in rural, small town, Iowa. It’s the same all over. And they say the cities and large towns are worse. Much worse.

Granted, voting on whether or not English is to be legally outlawed in a nation where 65% – the official figure – don’t speak English anyway, might not be as critical an issue as, say, acquiring food and water or striving every day to keep yourself and your family from being murdered or your house from being burned to the ground, but, it’s a start, right? First steps and what not, and all that, and so forth.

And if all goes well with the mailing lists, who knows, maybe you and the two other surviving White families in your state can network, somehow, sort of. Well, probably not. But it’s a nice idea!

If the goal of an advocacy group is for Whites to have an equal seat within the same political institutions and social constructs as a few hundred million non-Whites , then I’d advise holding off on donations. You’ll need the money for survival gear. And don’t worry about old age pensions. You won’t survive.

To put it bluntly, we will not vote our way out of this mess. The system is gone. The justice system is securely in the hands of our enemies. The economy is permanently ruined, which means the physical infrastructure of the nation (extending over three million square miles) is gone as well. Take a good look around. 98% of the roads, bridges, buildings, electrical grids, railways, water systems, waster management, police departments, fire departments, hospitals and so on are in as good a condition as they’ll ever be. From here on they will degrade and deteriorate until abandoned and Nature reclaims them.

We may, however, vote ourselves out of the situation. But that depends on leaders leading and followers following. And by that I mean that advocacy and voting within America today is pointless and will not solve a thing. In fact it will make matters worse. When the Huns are already rampaging through the streets, only insane people go around carrying a ballot on fixing the potholes.

No, the ONLY option is for Whites to vote themselves out of the empire, socially, politically and economically. Whites must separate and form their own nation, because the current one has already disowned them and has fallen too far to be brought back. That is the goal, the only goal, for which any struggle must aim for.

So all of the authors, pundits, advocates and so on can go about such activities till their heart’s content, but if their agenda is to “Inform to Reform”, then they are simply wasting time and resources. And time is something we do not have. In fact we’re already out of time. The point of no return came and went about twenty-five years ago.

What is needed from leaders is not slick looking websites, officially recognized third parties or more books. What is needed is, in the words of Yeats, “passionate intensity”. Something which, right now, is completely absent. We need leaders to get up on soapboxes and engage in passionate rhetoric. We need them fighting mad and we need them to work their listeners up into a frenzy, not throw a bucket of cold water on them. We need them to call on their followers to grab their torches and pitchforks, not scorn them into putting them away. Since the 1960’s there have been moments when Whites were ready to take to the streets in righteous indignation and yet, every time, our Wormtongue-like “leaders” have counseled calm and “rational” behavior (read, apathy) lest our adversaries on the left label us bigoted and reactionary. And civilization has free fallen into chaos and savagery as a result of heeding such advice.

A war of annihilation is currently ongoing against us. We are not only being physically assaulted, even the very notion of our existence and our history is being attacked and swept away as well. Simply begging for scraps, via application, in our own house is contemptible and will only bring on another lashing from our usurpers.

Yes, we need thinkers to steer the ship. But we first need to get the thing in the water and moving! We need leaders upfront who are belligerent, bullying, aggressive and assertive and, above all, unapologetic. They should never let phrases such as, “this isn’t about hate,” or “we just want a fair deal like everyone else,” pass their lips. They need to address us, not talk over us and to our enemies in search of approval from them. We need leaders who will spark a fire of indignation in us and send a chill of terror down the spines of our adversaries. We need leaders who will call on us to take to the streets, shut down the cities, close the interstates, storm the capitals and pull our money from the banks.

On that last one, I’d venture that if, say, 25 to 30% of White taxpayers would remove their money from the banks and take it permanently out of circulation (ensuring that that share stayed out of circulation), the Beast would be slain, almost literally, overnight. America is teetering on the brink right now. A well placed nudge would push it on over.

The welfare state, and all that it subsidizes, would be inevitably wiped out. Everything from lobbyist groups and activist organizations such as the ADL and NAACP to strong-arm enforcement alphabet agencies, would be, for all intents and purposes, gone. The congress and the courts could pass affirmative action, anti-discrimination or whatever legislation they wanted all day long and it wouldn’t matter. They would have no money, and thus no power or ability to enforce any of it. They’d be ignored and unacknowledged as they quickly withered on the vine. The current system/regime would be dead. The center would not hold. The UN, the EU, the IMF, all of it, would soon follow, because they are all creations and dependencies of the post-1945 American Empire.

We would then have a fighting chance, and a chance to reclaim our own civilization.

Could something worse follow the current system? No. The current system and where it is rapidly headed is as bad as it gets. When you assess our situation as it currently is, it is clear that one way or another, we will live or we will die by the motto ‘All Or Nothing’.

Shortly after my own political awakening I began to wonder, like so many others before me, why have nationalist ideas failed so completely to penetrate the mainstream of Western society. If you think about it no other political message can rival the potency of ideas and aesthetics that an authentic patriotic nationalism can bring to the table. If you need to be reminded of this just reflect for a moment on the natural appeal behind the following questions:

Do you want to restore the dignity and integrity of our culture?
Do you want to heal the social fabric and return a level of trust to our society that your grandparents once enjoyed?
Do you want to be able to live in communities made by and for your own without the hassle that comes with pricing out the unwanted in far flung exurbs?
Do you want to continue having your heritage demonized to your face and those of your children and their children in an unending bonfire of shame?
Do you want life?

There are powerful ideas embedded within these questions, and in uncertain times their power only grows. The libertarians have their abstractions, the liberal-socialists have their bribes, the conservatives have their symbols, but we offer everything. Never forget that.

Nevertheless, things are what they are, but it certainly hasn’t been for a lack of effort. The past generation and a half in the United States has seen many talented activist-missionaries who endeavored to get the word out about what was at stake and the promise of what could be, some of these attempts were quite creative. Yet their message continued to fall on deaf ears, the very people who stood to benefit from it the most rejected it in no uncertain terms. And though some things are changing for the better, by and large they continue to reject it. Why?

Raised high its head with stately branches crowned

by Cladrastis

Prometheus awoke from a terrible dream one night – a dream of a war in heaven. In his vision, the gods were defeated, their powers taken from them, and their palaces and gardens destroyed. The gods themselves had fallen from heaven and many among them had perished in the conflagration. In desperation, Prometheus did something that no one had ever dared before; he stole from the mind of the sleeping Deus a flame that had been jealously guarded for aeons. Fleeing heaven with the speed of a sparrow hawk, Prometheus held the sunburst tight against his breast; as he flew through the blackness of space holding the flame next to him, he was transformed by it. From his flesh, fiery feathers sprouted, and his arms transmuted into wings; as the sun was bright, his eyes became dark. With each beat of his wings, the light bearer’s appearance became more outrageous, more avian, and more intensely colored, until erupting in one last explosion of activity, the fire consumed him. He crashed into earth as a fireball and was discovered crumpled on the ground by a man and woman. With his final agonizing breath, Prometheus called to the man, saying, “feed me dear human, that I may bestow upon you the divine wind of the gods.” So the man tossed some grain and meat into the fire, and placed upon it incense woods. As the man did so, a jeweled egg rose from the undying ashes of the fallen angel’s body.

After some time had passed, and the man and woman gazed intently at the egg incubating in the embers, the shell cracked and a hatchling struggled to free itself; in its beak it held an emerald seed. Thanking the man for his kindness, the Firebird gave him the seed and told the man to plant it in a green hill-country. The resurrected bird said to the man and woman, “I have betrayed the gods and cannot return to them. I foresaw their end and your beginning; allow my spirit to dwell with you, and I will bestow upon you many more gifts than I have given you this day.” To this the man assented, and the Firebird turned himself into a flaming “crown of thorns” and alighted on the man’s head. The Firebird said “I will be with you always, and though the gods may beset you with many hardships, you will overcome them.” As he spoke these words, Prometheus dissolved into the man’s brow. From that day forward, man was lord over the Earth.

The man and the woman wandered into the East until they found a verdant hill-country gushing with springs; the land was pleasing to the eye and fragrant, so they planted the emerald seed in the ground in the hope that it would germinate there. Before long, a shoot sprouted in the soil, and it raised high its stately crown into a tree’s canopy. The tree had never before graced the earth, and it gladly spread its branches across the land. Soon the mighty tree flowered and after shedding its last fading blossom, set fruit. As it did so, a garden grew up around it, and the man and woman felt happy and blessed. Fruit from the tree fell to the ground, and wild beasts came and consumed it; in so doing, they became tame, and the man and the woman looked after them. Then the man and woman themselves ate from the tree; afterward, they wed, and for the first time, they saw the world as it truly is – the garden of delight.

The gods, seeing how prosperous the man and his wife had become grew angry and jealous. Holding counsel with his wisest lords, Sovereign Deus determined that man must be wholly destroyed, lest he challenge the gods themselves. Thus the Craftsman of heaven was charged with fashioning an ornate golden box out of precious stones, and he placed upon it the seal of Deus as well as the terrible visage of a hundred-headed dragon.

One day the woman was walking amongst the beasts in the garden when she stumbled upon the elaborate box, which had been placed there by the Messenger. The dragon on the box called to the woman, saying, “open me human child, and I shall make you the fairest creature in all the world,” and this was true, for the gods do not lie, though they relish in deceit. The woman seized the box, and lifting its lid, discovered within its depths a rotten fruit from the great tree; burrowing in the fruit was a tiny worm, though she did not see it. The fruit smelled terrible – like rotten flesh and burning hair – and fearing that she had been deceived by the outward appearance of the strange box, the woman tossed it aside.

She returned to her husband and he declared, “though fair you were when last you left me, fairest of all creatures have you become; you are wholly changed, and it is to my liking.” Gazing at herself in one of the many crystal pools in the garden, the man’s wife saw that her hair was as sunny as flax and her eyes as cool and clear as the daylit sky. She was indeed the fairest creature ever to grace the earth.

The man pressed the woman for an explanation, and she told him of the box and the dragon. Seeking a transformation of his own, the man ventured off to search for the box, but he could not find it. Meanwhile, the worm had inched its way inconspicuously to the tree at the center of the garden, and when it got there, it too began to eat the good fruit. The worm grew quickly, and as it grew it climbed into the tree and hid itself in the branches. Indeed, so clever was the gods’ artifice that the growing worm took on the appearance of a branch and sucked life from the tree like a mistletoe.

That night, the man and the woman fell asleep under the tree, and a vision came to them. The garden was dying, and they saw man and beast alike in golden chains. In the center of the garden where the tree grew, now fat and overgrown, a hundred-headed dragon covered in glittering scales of diamond, silver, and gold had coiled its vast body about the tree’s trunk. Venom dripped from the dragon’s lips and squalor covered the once-beautiful hill-country. The dragon said to the sorrowful people in the vision, “I am Ladon! Deus chose me, and me alone, to rule over the garden and all who walk within it. Crown me as your king; bow down and worship me, lest I destroy you completely.” The women cried and the men gnashed their teeth, and when all seemed hopeless, a living beast walked into the garden. The beast had the ivory head of a serpent, the crimson body of a lion, and the verdigris talons and wings of an eagle. The beast was, at once, awesome, terrifying and beautiful to behold. The living beast roared, hissed, and cried aloud at the dragon, and the sound it made was like pealing thunder and crackling electricity. “Adversary,” whispered the dragon, “you have come to challenge me again. You may be wise, strong, and proud, but you have failed before and you will fail again this day.” With that, the beast leapt at the dragon, and as he did so, a third eye on the serpent’s head opened; it was black like obsidian and radiated prismatic light. In the serpent’s eye Ladon saw his own reflection, and for a moment he faltered.

Then the man and woman awoke from their sleep. Slinking in the branches overhead, was the sly and intelligent worm; he had watched with pleasure as the man and woman tossed and turned in the night. On his back a silver scale glistened in the moonlight.

The Liberal Project Bumps into an Ecological Wall (Part I)

One of the hallmarks of the ongoing Liberal catastrophe that we’re all experiencing is its inability to respect the natural boundaries and barriers of human existence. For example, we all know that by flooding our society with alien peoples and thereby ignoring the natural boundaries of identity that we are consigned to live in societies that have less trust and an ever dissolving social fabric. Moreover, we also know that by violating these boundaries of identity that we can expect the Liberal system to experience convulsions of anger, however incoherent, from the body of our own people as they slowly become aware of the dissolution that’s been planned for them.

And just as the battle intensifies between the Liberal system and our people’s incoherent desire for life, ecological walls begin to loom over the horizon. From America’s paper of record just a few weeks ago: Arid Australia Sips Seawater, but at a Cost

Take a moment to read the article.

If I may briefly summarize the situation, the Liberal system has planned for Australia to become an overpopulated stew of various peoples that will require more fresh water than what the arid continent can supply in the long-term. The system’s solution to Australia’s next water crisis is not to plan for a sustainable society that aims to bring population levels in line with what the land can support but instead build more expensive desalination plants and pass off the costs (some of them unintended) to the natives.

As you might imagine, some are starting to suspect that mindlessly growing Australia through an endless wave of immigration (sound familiar) might not be such a good idea after all. From the NYT article:

…
But desalination is also drawing fierce criticism and civic protests. Many homeowners, angry about rising water bills, and environmentalists, wary of the plants’ effect on the climate, call the projects energy-hungry white elephants. Stricter conservation measures, like mandating more efficient washing machines, would easily wring more water from existing supplies, critics say.

Desalination has also helped dampen the enthusiasm for a “big Australia,” the previous, immigration-friendly government’s projection that the country’s population will rise to 36 million in 2050, from 22 million now.

“Big waste of money,” said Helen Meyer, 65, a retired midwife in Tugun, the town where the northeastern state of Queensland opened a $1 billion desalination plant last year. “It cost a lot of money to build, and it uses a lot of power. Australia is a dry country. I think we just have enough water for 22 million people. What are we going to do when we’re up to 36 million?”
…

That’s what I call game, set, and match for the natural order of life on this planet.

The Liberal system and the ideology that fuels it is so far removed from the natural order of things that it will come crashing down this century. Even if the natural life affirming instincts of our people fail (and I think they largely have) ecological walls will start to loom large this century for which there is no answer other than what the Liberal system refuses to do. To wit, how can a Liberal economic system built around the concept of endless growth answer the limits of nature? It can’t.

In my opinion, the politics of the revolutionary Right must capitalize on this fundamental failure and present a vision of a sustainable Western society that is in harmony with itself and the world around it. As the ongoing crises of resource scarcity continue to rock the politics of the 21st century I think you can expect the wind to be at our backs with such a vision.

The environmentalist movement is deeply right-wing in at least two ways. It is to the Right both philosophically and aesthetically, we can see the former in its goal to preserve the natural world, which comes out of a conservative instinct, and the latter in its anti-humanistic and pessimistic tendencies. In my opinion it is an accident of history that the Left adopted environmentalist sensibilities as a quazi-cynical maneuver to attack polluting corporations (and by extension the capitalist system) while conveniently ignoring the fact that the worst environmental atrocities were committed by state governments (i.e. USSR and China).

Furthermore, the Left’s decision to accept the moral authority of environmentalist thinking makes it a fabulous Trojan Horse for the discrediting of the Liberal vision amongst elites without even having to mention cultural matters. For example, anytime a Leftist tells you that we should restrict our carbon output and reduce the energy demands of our society to a sustainable level you should never fail to tell them that having a policy of zero net-migration would go along way towards achieving this goal. To wit, you cannot bring Third World peoples to Western society without also increasing their rate of consumption.

There are powerful ideological tools here that we haven’t even begun to use and the best part is that the Left has no prefabricated response to any of it. I’ve been called “Racist!” on a number of occasions but never when making this kind of argument.

A letter to Europeans and those of the European Diaspora; in other words, a letter to all white people.

Dear White Man,

We regret to inform you that your kind has been slated for termination. We, the various Third World majorities of Africa, Asia, India, South America, and the Middle East assert that your long history of success at building civilizations, developing new technologies, creating stable governments, fostering good will, feeding much of the world, and increasing peace and prosperity even amongst the riotous hordes of our own homelands, has made us envious and resentful of you. We, who make up 92% of the global population, feel that we can no longer accept the great disparity between your success and our abject failure. The solution to this inequality should be obvious to all concerned.

We are planning to invade your ancestral homelands, little by little, and to facilitate this, we have the full cooperation of your controlled media and government, academia, and law enforcement organizations. While we, personally, do not control any of these entities ourselves, we are profiting endlessly from the crypto-Marxist system put in place many decades ago by an ethnic fifth column which operates with complete impunity at all levels of your political, academic, and media culture. Their interference in the natural development of your constitutional republics has been indispensable to our efforts to wrest from you the control of everything that you’ve struggled to build and maintain over the last century. Indeed, were it not for them, none of our present plans would have even been possible.

By carefully controlling and managing the schools, universities, media, and press, this out group has managed to convince the great bulk of your racial kinsmen that not only is resistance futile, but that it is immoral, barbaric, depraved, and unworthy of a thinking individual. By promoting the stereotype of a racist redneck resistance, they have made the idea of a struggle for White Identity a veritable sin in the minds of nearly every White person. In short: they have convinced European-derived peoples that a prolonged suicide is preferable to the unmitigated evil of racism.

Vergil, Mozart, Shakespeare, and all other bourgeois manifestations of your high culture will be vanquished forever. All of your legends and heroes will be spat upon, purged, and finally forgotten. Your cultural folkways will be transgressions; your identity will become a crime.

We come for your JOBS, your MONEY, your WOMEN, and eventually your LIVES. It will not be much longer now. What is yours will be ours.

Everyone I know is fuming over the “unconstitutional” health-care bill that was “un-democratically” shoved down our throats. I have to keep explaining to such people that compared to legislation passed in the 1960’s Obamacare is a minor triviality.

It’s amazing (yet sadly not unexpected) that so many seem to gloss over the rather draconian and spirit-crushing bits of legislation commonly refereed to as “civil rights”. Many seem to prefer to ignore or forget that among the “civil rights” accomplishments have been: legalizing abortion, promoting homosexuality, exalting feminism, attacking and attempting to destroy the family, de-constructing communities, rewriting history, and other equally civilization-crushing acts.

And these were done under the notion of “equality”. And to bring about “equality” our society had to destroy, in theory and in fact, freedom of association.

Since the “civil rights” legislation went into effect, Americans have been told (under threat of government force) who they must live among, who they can do business with, who they can vacation with, who their children must attend school with, and in what company they can congregate. All done to criminalize discrimination. Yet the most fundamental freedom that can be had (either collectively or individually) is the right to discriminate. Take away that right and freedom is instantly dead.

And the critical aspect of this is that prejudices and the discriminations they encourage are generally based on collective historical experience. They are an expression of a society’s hard fought for wisdom, enduring and solidifying down through countless ages of toil and struggle. They are not mere attitudes, but rather moral and social guidelines that define and defend a people.

In the late Spring of 1978 Alexander Solzhenitsyn gave this brilliant and insightful address, appropriately entitled ‘A World Split Apart’, to the graduating class of Harvard University in Massachusetts. In it he questions the wisdom of ‘the convergence’ of Capitalism and Marxism to form what today is known as Multi-Culturalism…

Anguish about our divided world gave birth to the theory of convergence between leading Western countries and the Soviet Union. It is a soothing theory which overlooks the fact that these worlds are not at all developing into similarity; neither one can be transformed into the other without the use of violence. Besides, convergence inevitably means acceptance of the other side’s defects, too, and this is hardly desirable.

Text of Address by

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

at Harvard Class Day Afternoon Exercises,

Thursday, June 8, 1978

A. Solzhenitsyn

I am sincerely happy to be here with you on this occasion and to become personally acquainted with this old and most prestigious University. My congratulations and very best wishes to all of today’s graduates.

Harvard’s motto is “Veritas.” Many of you have already found out and others will find out in the course of their lives that truth eludes us if we do not concentrate with total attention on its pursuit. And even while it eludes us, the illusion still lingers of knowing it and leads to many misunderstandings. Also, truth is seldom pleasant; it is almost invariably bitter. There is some bitterness in my speech today, too. But I want to stress that it comes not from an adversary but from a friend.

Three years ago in the United States I said certain things which at that time appeared unacceptable. Today, however, many people agree with what I then said …

A WORLD SPLIT APART

by Alexander Solzhenitsyn

The split in today’s world is perceptible even to a hasty glance. Any of our contemporaries readily identifies two world powers, each of them already capable of entirely destroying the other. However, understanding of the split often is limited to this political conception, to the illusion that danger may be abolished through successful diplomatic negotiations or by achieving a balance of armed forces. The truth is that the split is a much profounder and a more alienating one, that the rifts are more than one can see at first glance. This deep manifold split bears the danger of manifold disaster for all of us, in accordance with the ancient truth that a Kingdom—in this case, our Earth—divided against itself cannot stand.

Contemporary Worlds

There is the concept of the Third World: thus, we already have three worlds. Undoubtedly, however, the number is even greater; we are just too far away to see. Any ancient deeply rooted autonomous culture, especially if it is spread on a wide part of the earth’s surface, constitutes an autonomous world, full of riddles and surprises to Western thinking. As a minimum, we must include in this category China, India, the Muslim world and Africa, if indeed we accept the approximation of viewing the latter two as compact units. For one thousand years Russia has belonged to such a category, although Western thinking systematically committed the mistake of denying its autonomous character and therefore never understood it, just as today the West does not understand Russia in communist captivity. It may be that in the past years Japan has increasingly become a distant part of the West, I am no judge here; but as to Israel, for instance, it seems to me that it stands apart from the Western world in that its state system is fundamentally linked to religion.

How short a time ago, relatively, the small new European world was easily seizing colonies everywhere, not only without anticipating any real resistance, but also usually despising any possible values in the conquered peoples’ approach to life. On the face of it, it was an overwhelming success, there were no geographic frontiers to it. Western society expanded in a triumph of human independence and power. And all of a sudden in the twentieth century came the discovery of its fragility and friability. We now see that the conquests proved to be short lived and precarious, and this in turn points to defects in the Western view of the world which led to these conquests. Relations with the former colonial world now have turned into their opposite and the Western

The History of White People

A new book has hit the bestseller list and is being promoted in every liberal nook and cranny imaginable. If one did a search on this book, and read the reviews, you would come away thinking that it was remarkable, insightful, and of intellectual merit. When I actually read it, however, it was incredible rubbish; not because I disagree with the conclusions, but because the author, Nell Irvin Painter, is simply an unintelligent Black woman. But the Left unashamedly promotes her book as if it had even a scintilla of redeeming value.

I saw Ms. Painter being interviewed by Stephen Colbert, where he mercilessly made fun of her while maintaining his liberal comedic bias—it was quite entertaining. But Painter, author of The History of White People, has been interviewed and reviewed by the more serious side of the anti-White establishment. Acclaimed for spending ten years researching and writing the book, she makes a mockery of Black scholarship—if that is not an oxymoron. In fact one only has to read the very beginning of the book and the very end, to realize that she contradicts herself repeatedly. The book makes no sense. It also struck me that she probably had read Noel Ignatiev’s How the Irish Became White and followed the same line of argument with slightly different material. The book was published in 2010, but it is apparent that she finished the book in 2005, just ten years after publication of Ignatiev’s anti-White screed.

In the Introduction she states, “Today, however, biologists and geneticists (not to mention literary critics) no longer believe in the physical existence of races—though they recognize the continuing power of racism (the belief that races exist, and that some are better than others). It took some two centuries to reach this conclusion, after countless racial schemes had spun out countless different numbers of races, even of white races, and attempts at classification produced frustration. Although science today denies race any standing as objective truth, and the U.S. census faces taxonomic meltdown, many Americans cling to race as the unschooled cling to superstition. So long as racial discrimination remains a fact of life and statistics can be arranged to support racial difference, the American belief in races will endure. But confronted with the actually existing American population—its distribution of wealth, power, and beauty—the notion of American whiteness will continue to evolve, as it has since the creation of the American Republic.”

Now let’s jump to the last chapter, “Subsequently, an intriguing discussion on race and genetics has been afoot among Jews. One side contends that Jews have nearly always seen themselves as a race, and that studies of Jewish DNA underscore the ‘tribal’ nature of Jewish religion. The other side warns about the chaos that could flow from focusing too tightly on the biological basis of Jewishness, for Jewish men and Jewish women do not share the same set of genes. While the Y-chromosomes of Jewish men show a relatively high degree of similarity all over the world, they are particularly close to the configuration of Middle Easterners of any background. Jewish women’s mitochondrial DNA, in contrast, shows much less similarity, leading to the conclusion that Jewish men often married non-Jewish women. Treating Jewishness as something in the genes risks fissuring an already heterogeneous community.”

What is so bizarre about this statement is that the same ethnic group that dominates cultural anthropology, sociology, and the biological sciences—that is Jews who she claims universally deny that races exist—are the same people who are claiming that they are part of the very real “Jewish race.”

She continues, “The biological meaninglessness of classifying people according to race remained the scholarly consensus until about 2002. Then research came to light that sought to lump DNA patterns by population groups. This work produced a theory that DNA falls into five major groups—Africans, Europeans and Middle Easterners, East Asians, Melanesians, and American Indians—which happen to correspond more or less to those of Johann Friedrich Blumenbach and popular views. (True to the disorderly history of race, a study in Scientific American in 2003 reported a four-way grouping.) The New York Times illustrated its story about this research with a long colored bar graph. Only in its last paragraph does the report explain that even though all people ‘share most of their genetic variability in common,’ the chart is based on ‘these genetic differences, not on the very much larger shared inheritance.’ In short, the illustration is neither helpful nor accurate, in that it wildly exaggerates differences while omitting the overwhelming degree of similarity. True to racial thinking, differences were stressed and similarities played down. The idea of biological race was reemerging as genetic science.” So she admits in the end that race does in fact exist according to many in the scientific community; take away political correctness and there would not be any controversy.

Continuing again she states, “This sort of reinterpretation seemed eerily familiar. Liberal social scientists and geneticists feared that some geneticists were once again searching for genetic causes underlying diseases like diabetes and cardiovascular disease that reflect racial disparities likely rooted in injuries of class and history. Lost in that speculation was the certainty that those diseases stem from a complex interplay between environment and the interaction of many genes, rather than the few genes governing superficial characteristics like skin color and hair texture. Furthermore, rather than addressing poverty, social disarray, and unequal access to health care, genetics could reinforce the class and race status quo, thereby echoing the hereditarian gospel of early twentieth-century eugenics.”

Again, the twisted mind of paranoid Blackness claims that pharmacogenomics is all about a conspiracy by White people for the explicit purpose of not having to spend money on the downtrodden Blacks. It is surprising that we ever even see White scientists in public, since they have to spend so much of their time threading together these conspiracies against “people of color.” Note how intelligent the Ashkenazi Jews are and how stupid are the Blacks; yet they both constantly pathologize White behavior. In the meantime, Whites just passively oblige both groups. We dutifully do as we are told, under the threat of being labeled as racist. It is all so transparent.