Introduction by Croakey: In news you might have missed, on Saturday the Federal Government released the report from the Ministerial Advisory Committee on Out-of-Pocket Costs, and outlined a national strategy to tackle excessive out-of-pocket costs.

The Committee had been hard at work since January 2018, when health minister Greg Hunt announced that it had been formed to “identify why some doctors are charging large fees, and explore strategies to ensure that consumers and referring General Practitioners can compare fees and out-of-pocket costs when choosing a doctor.”

As part of the new strategy, the Government will provide funding to develop a searchable website of the costs of specialist services, with an initial focus on fees for gynaecology, obstetrics and cancer services.

It will also fund an education initiative “to increase the understanding of medical out of pocket costs among consumers, their families and GPs”.

It could be argued that the Committee has done what it was set up to do but, as outlined in the post below, it is also likely that the new strategy will do little to address the underlying problem. As medical billing expert, Margaret Faux, commented on Twitter,

Suggesting a website will solve out of pocket costs is like thinking you can repair an A380 aircraft because you’re the publisher of a repair manual.”

In a press release, Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association (AHHA) Acting Chief Executive Dr Linc Thurecht expressed similar reservations that opportunities to deal with known sources of excessive OOP costs had been overlooked.

Late last month, Jennifer Doggett (Croakey Editor, AHCRA Chair, and fellow at the Centre for Policy Development) and Dr Lesley Russell (Croakey Contributing Editor and Associate Professor, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney) published a discussion paper that takes a more holistic view of how the burden of OOP costs can be reduced for Australian consumers.

Here, they summarise their suggested action plan. By way of an introduction, we include their response to last Saturday’s announcement.

Jennifer Doggett and Lesley Russell write:

It is our opinion that the report’s recommendations (for a website that provides information about medical specialists’ costs and for an education campaign to improve the understanding of OOP costs for consumers, GPs and medical specialists) do not go far enough, given the substantial and widespread impact of OOP costs.

The committee recognises that a minority of specialists have been charging egregiously large fees, including to patients on low incomes; that some charge ‘hidden’ administrative or booking fees, which are not disclosed to Medicare or private health insurers; and that there is a cumulative financial impact of more modest charges.

However, disappointingly, there are no substantive recommendations for addressing these issues.

A specialist fees website on its own will not benefit the majority of consumers negatively impacted by OOP costs, such as the 663 000 people who reported delaying or avoiding seeing a GP when needed due to cost or the 974 000 people who delayed or avoided filling a prescription due to cost (AHIW 2016-17 figures). It also may result in unintended consequences, such as fee increases, if implemented in isolation from other strategies targeting OOP costs.

The out-of-pocket policy vacuum

In almost all areas of our supposedly ‘universal’ health system, increasing costs are preventing average Australians from getting the care they need. Last year over 600 000 people avoided or delayed going to the GP due to cost. Almost one million people who needed a prescription medication avoided or delayed filling their prescription for financial reasons. Cost was also a barrier for over two million Australians who avoided seeking needed dental care.

Strategies for dealing with the growing problem of out-of-pocket (OOP) health care costs should be central to all political parties’ health policies. OOP costs make up the largest non-government source of health funding in Australia, contributing almost double the amount of funding as private health insurance, and have a major impact on consumers’ access to care.

However, currently, OOP costs are a ‘policy vacuum’ with payments imposed by providers in an inconsistent, unfair and inefficient manner across the health system in a way that creates barriers to access and reduces the efficiency of our health system overall.

Part of the complexity of this issue is that OOP costs are not a single entity but a group of overlapping and inter-related problems. Together these form a ‘wicked’ policy dilemma not solvable by a single strategy or policy change but requiring long-term action on multiple fronts and the engagement of all stakeholders, including governments, industry and providers.

Due to the complex and dynamic nature of our health system any policy changes also require ongoing monitoring to avoid unintended effects elsewhere.

Investments and returns

For these reasons, our new paper on this issue proposes a staged approach, starting with agreement on the overall aims and guiding principles for OOP costs and their (constrained) role within the Australian healthcare system. These should take account of the fact that Australia will need to spend more on healthcare in the future to maintain our world class healthcare system, but also recognise that evidence- and value-based expenditures on health are investments that deliver reductions in costs elsewhere in the healthcare system and in the federal budget.

Ensuring visibility

Fundamental to this approach is the need for a dedicated area within the Health Department to consolidate the disparate sources of data on OOPs, coordinate stakeholder input and lead policy development. One reason for the lack of progress in addressing this issue is that it has been largely invisible to policymakers (although not to consumers) as the effects of OOPs are spread across different areas of the health portfolio and different levels of government. We cannot solve a problem that we cannot see.

Setting the parameters

Addressing the current problems with OOPs will involve choices about how healthcare funding is raised (eg taxation and levies), about what are considered essential vs non-essential services, about which healthcare costs we share with others (eg via Medicare or PHI) and which costs are more suitably bourne by individuals. All stakeholders should have input into debating these questions but ultimately it needs to be consumers and the community whose interests guide the development of policy solutions.

Guiding principles

Our initial suggestions is to establish some overarching principles for OOPs, including the following:

OOP costs (for individual services, episodes of care, and ongoing treatments) should not be a financial barrier to accessing essential healthcare.

OOP costs should promote the efficient use of healthcare.

Adequate safety-nets should be established to ensure vulnerable individuals and groups (eg. people on low incomes and those who are high level users of services) are protected from OOP costs and not discriminated against.

Data should be collected on OOP costs across the healthcare system and used to inform policies and strategies. There must be recognition of the cumulative impact of these costs and also that some people do not incur any OOP costs because they are so financially disadvantaged that they never present for needed care.

Consumer experience should be at the centre of policy development to address OOP costs.

We also suggest that priority areas for action should be those areas of health care and groups of consumers particularly impacted by OOP costs. These include people with chronic conditions, people who require services/products not currently subsidised (such as non-PBS medications, medical aids and appliances), people on low incomes and those requiring basic dental care.

Suggested strategies

Based on these principles and priorities we propose a number of strategies, both short and long-term, including:

A ‘fee disclosure’ resource and comprehensive complaints mechanism to support consumers to make informed choices about their health care and seek redress when OOP costs are unreasonable;

A comprehensive medical and health care safety-net (initially combining existing MBS and PBS safety-nets and over time including other health care costs);

Agreements with the medical and health care professions to limit OOP costs, with support for lower charges and penalties (such as the withdrawal of Medicare entitlements) for egregious billing;

Workforce reforms, such as changes to the GP gatekeeper role, increased use of paramedics, nurse practitioners and allied health professionals and a strengthened role for generalists (to reduce reliance on multiple specialists).

Tackling the causes

Ultimately we believe that the idiosyncratic features of the Australian healthcare system – in which there are no constraints on prices charged by healthcare professionals for Medicare-funded services, and efforts to address the maldistribution of the healthcare workforce are hamstrung by a constitutional provision and that provides billions of dollars annually in subsidies for private health insurance which the majority of Australians do not have and even fewer want – must be addressed.

However, these are controversial and major reforms which we will take time to develop and sell to the powerful stakeholder groups that influence the health system.

In the meantime, action on OOPs is imperative to ensure our universal health system remains viable long enough for these broader reforms to take place.

Jennifer Doggett is a Croakey Editor, AHCRA Chair, and fellow at the Centre for Policy Development. Dr Lesley Russell is a Croakey Contributing Editor and Associate Professor at the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney.

Further responses to the National Strategy to tackle specialist out-of-pocket costs.

The Australian Medical Association says the proposed website needs to list what patients can expect back from Medicare and their private health insurance fund, as well as specialist fees.

Private Healthcare Australia says the federal government plan is a welcome step, and further urgent action must be taken against medical specialists who charge egregious fees or fail to inform consumers of likely costs in advance.

Consumers Health Forum of Australia says the new national strategy is a good first step, and they would like to see ways to ensure participation, and individual performance statistics of specialists.

3 Comments

Mark Fitzgibbon

Guys there’s a fairly simply solution.
1. Allow private health insurers to cover doctor fee gaps outside of the hospital. Its an ideological anachronism that we can’t extend our Medigap agreement beyond hospitals. It causes not only excessive fees and out of pockets but a bias towards hospitalisation.
2. Insurers use there bargaining and buying power to negotiate more reasonable and consistent additional Medigap fees with doctors. Although its a cost shift to insurers the healthcare system as a whole benefits.
3. Members can then be given certainty about whether or not they will have an out of pocket. They could still see a doctor “out of network” if they chose but at least they know there will likely be a gap.
4. We will complement the fee information and choice with qualitative data.

Lesley Russell

Sadly, we’ve seen what PHI bargaining power can’t do with doctors’ surgical, anaesthesia fees. This proposal would completely destroy the universality of Medicare.
We’ve suggested the French approach to public / private might work, but would require serious discussion, buy-in by all stakeholders, enforcement.

tim woodruff

The major strategy to address the problem appears to have been omitted. Why not stop charging copayments. The Fed Gov could start by winding back copayments it imposes for pharmaceuticals, copayments which prevent about 1 in 20 sick Australians from filling out prescriptions. Governments could then look at doctor imposed copayments by simply funding enough doctors in hospital outpatients to address the shocking waiting times to see specialists, and by funding more GPs to provide bulk billed services. Not complicated.
Then we would be moving toa truly universal health care rather than the current state where we have universal access to an inadequate rebate and to public hospitals so long as one is prepared to wait for months and years to access the hospitals
tim woodruff
doctors reform society

About Croakey

Croakey is a social journalism project that enables debate and investigations of health issues and policy. We connect, collaborate, and evolve.
We pay our respects to the Traditional Custodians of the country where we live, work and travel upon, and to the Elders, past, present and future.
Read more here.

Contact Croakey

Get croakey things

More info

What others say

It is polite and political, informative and inspiring. Active engagement is what Croakey does – and I like it!

Professor Kerry ArabenaChair of Indigenous Health, The University of Melbourne

If news doesn’t make you squirm it’s simply propaganda. Croakey’s unique blend of activism, humour and plain good reporting makes it an essential - if not always comfortable - read!

Professor Virginia BarbourExecutive Officer, Australian Open Access Support Group, Chair, COPE, Professor, School of Medicine, Griffith University

Croakey is an important part of the health landscape providing progressive, current and incisive commentary.

Professor Fran BaumProfessor of Public Health, Flinders University

Croakey is terrific. Thought provoking, well researched information….and easy to read. A great combination.

Professor Kate ConigraveProfessor Addiction Medicine, The University of Sydney

Croakey has been a platform which has encouraged Aboriginal voice and actively sought it out. I started out as a reader, then followed on Twitter, was a guest tweeter on @WePublic health, and have become a contributor.

Croakey is now well established as compulsory reading for influencers and observers in health and medicine in Australia and internationally – and rightly so.

John FlanneryPublic Affairs Director, Australian Medical Association

Croakey provides an informed voice to the health, equity and environmental debates, and is helping mobilise the necessary political and popular support for a radical break from the complacent and compartmentalized attitude that still dominates much of the political agenda.

Professor Sharon FrielDirector and Professor of Health Equity Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet), Director, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The Australian National University

From a crowded inbox, Croakey always leaps to my attention. It delivers views and information on a wide range of issues of relevance to rural and remote health and wellbeing.

Gordon GregoryNational Rural Health Alliance

Croakey is health media rather than medical media. You should be reading it every day if you're interested in health services or population health.

Ben Harris-RoxasZEST Health Strategies

Croakey provides snappy, expert views on the whole spectrum of public health issues, from equity to efficiency, from determinants to prevention to management.

Professor Jon KarnonSchool of Population Health, University of Adelaide; President of the Health Services Research Association of Australia and New Zealand

Croakey has served splendidly as an independent voice in the health policy arena.

Emeritus Professor Stephen LeederThe University of Sydney

Time and again I go to Croakey to understand the politics behind public health because Croakey sorts the wheat from the chaff.

Dr Mark LockResearch Fellow, The University of Newcastle

I love the context and clarity that Croakey's contributors bring to very complex issues. And the merch.

Marie McInerneyjournalist, editor, Croakey moderator

Croakey has pioneered an unprecedented role in providing an open forum for the revelation and exchange of thinking on health in Australia.

Mark Metherellhealth journalist, CHF

Croakey - like a sore throat spreading amongst friends - helps to spread healthy ideas rapidly through the blog and the Twittersphere. Thank you Croakey.

Michael MoorePublic Health Association of Australia

Croakey - Australia's healthiest news-site!

Former MP, Rob Oakeshott

If you work in the health area – and especially if you are a policy wonk, a political nerd, or a news fiend – then Croakey Blog is an essential component of your life.

Lesley RussellAdj Assoc Professor at Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Visiting Fellow, Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Australian National University

The diversity of authors and timeliness of posts are very much appreciated. Bring me more of this!

One of my favourite things about Croakey is the active engagement of so many people with a passion for equity and public health.

Melissa Sweetpublic health journalist, Croakey founder, PhD candidate

Croakey cuts through health care professional and organisational interests with edgy critiques about the diverse communities they are there for. In other words, you call BS on those with self interest.

Jason TrethowanCEO PHN Western Victoria

Croakey is a must for anybody looking to stay on the cutting edge of health news.

Alison VerhoevenAustralian Healthcare and Hospitals Association

So happy to be creating and coding for such a dedicated, professional and good-humored team.

Mitchell WardArtistic Director of Rock Lily Design and Croakey

If you care about a public health issue, or want others to care, get it online and get it on Croakey.

Croakey is a space that invites us to to challenge and interrogate our practice and our policy.

Mary FreerChange Day Australia

Croakey is a valuable voice in the health space

Catherine KingShadow Minister for Health

Croakey is a must read for anyone who craves the public health stories that no one else reports.

Dr Becky FreemanSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney

We love the difference Croakey makes to the health conversation in Australia.

Professors Marc Tennant, Estie Kruger and Kate Dyson International Research Collaborative, Oral Health and Equity, The University of Western Australia.

The broad mix of contributors, topics and prolific tweets combine to make it a valuable and lively source of news and food for thought for all Australians.

Shauna Hurley Communications Manager, Cochrane Australia School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University

Croakey is the platform where health issues are dissected from every angle – from the complex impact on health arising from social, economic and environmental policies, to the influence of vested interests on public health, and insightful analysis of health care policies.

Marita Hefler Researcher, News Editor, BMJ Tobacco Control

Croakey gives me the best independent and most relevant public health news and views.

Croakey has, over some years, provided a platform for debate about health policy, planning, funding and services. There aren’t enough places for these debates, and important issues affecting the health of our community risk going unexplored. Croakey helps to fill this hole.

Croakey is one of the few places where public health "activists" can vent their spleen...It's also a useful place for journalists/media to find contacts who can speak intelligently on public health issues.

Dr Rosemary Stanton OAM Public health nutrition "activist"

Intelligence and thoughtfulness are pre-requisite foundations for a civilised society’s media, and Croakey rises above the mundanity of most Australian efforts to remind us that smart, switched-on writers and thinkers are still out there