to your HTML
Add class="sortable" to any table you'd like to make sortable
Click on the headers to sort
Thanks to many, many people for contributions and suggestions.
Licenced as X11: http://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/licence.html
This basically means: do what you want with it.
*/
var stIsIE = /*@cc_on!@*/false;
sorttable = {
init: function() {
// quit if this function has already been called
if (arguments.callee.done) return;
// flag this function so we don't do the same thing twice
arguments.callee.done = true;
// kill the timer
if (_timer) clearInterval(_timer);
if (!document.createElement || !document.getElementsByTagName) return;
sorttable.DATE_RE = /^(\d\d?)[\/\.-](\d\d?)[\/\.-]((\d\d)?\d\d)$/;
forEach(document.getElementsByTagName('table'), function(table) {
if (table.className.search(/\bsortable\b/) != -1) {
sorttable.makeSortable(table);
}
});
},
makeSortable: function(table) {
if (table.getElementsByTagName('thead').length == 0) {
// table doesn't have a tHead. Since it should have, create one and
// put the first table row in it.
the = document.createElement('thead');
the.appendChild(table.rows[0]);
table.insertBefore(the,table.firstChild);
}
// Safari doesn't support table.tHead, sigh
if (table.tHead == null) table.tHead = table.getElementsByTagName('thead')[0];
if (table.tHead.rows.length != 1) return; // can't cope with two header rows
// Sorttable v1 put rows with a class of "sortbottom" at the bottom (as
// "total" rows, for example). This is B&R, since what you're supposed
// to do is put them in a tfoot. So, if there are sortbottom rows,
// for backwards compatibility, move them to tfoot (creating it if needed).
sortbottomrows = [];
for (var i=0; i

Based on all we're now hearing, the Federal Reserve is getting set to take an axe to its target Federal Funds Rate (FFR), the principal tool the Fed has at its disposal to regulate the supply of money in the economy, which is now set at a level of 4.25%.

Most Recent Month's Consumer Price Index, All Items, Less Food and Energy, Not Seasonally Adjusted

Same Month, Prior Year's Consumer Price Index, All Items, Less Food and Energy, Not Seasonally Adjusted

Unemployment Data

Most Recent Month's Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Rate (%)

Monetary Policy Data

The Mankiw Factor

The Mankiw Constant

Estimated Level of Federal Funds Rate

Calculated Results

Values

Federal Funds Rate to Target (%)

Leaving the values of the Mankiw Factor (at 1.6) and the Mankiw Constant (at 8.5) unchanged, which has produced results that have matched well with where the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee has set the level of the Federal Funds Rate target since 1999, gives us a target FFR of 4.40%. With the target now at 4.25%, this result suggests that the Fed should actually be considering raising rates to head off inflationary pressures in the U.S. economy.

However, as Jim Hamilton has found, the market isn't anticipating higher rates of inflation for the U.S. economy, as measured by the yields and spread between nominal and inflation-adjusted 10-year treasuries, which opens the door for a rate cut.

Cutting the FFR target now would seem to be a sharp divergence between what the Taylor Rule would suggest the Fed should do and what the Fed will actually do. Fortunately, we've already have evidence for where this has happened in the recent past, which we've presented in the chart below:

The divergence when the Fed pushed its target FFR well below what would be expected using a Taylor Rule begins shortly after January 2001. Here, the Fed cranked up the money supply in response to a worsening economy, later aggravated by the fallout from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Stimulating the economy by cutting the Federal Funds Target Rate by way more than what the Taylor Rule would suggest is wise would be the Fed's version of taking its monetary policy dial and turning it up to eleven. Where our tool is concerned, the same effect can be obtained by cranking up the Mankiw Factor to correspond with a much looser monetary policy.

Doing just that, we find that increasing the Mankiw Factor to 1.85, leaving all other values unchanged, produces a target Federal Funds Rate of 3.76%, consistent with that half percentage point cut. Cranking the Mankiw Factor to 1.95 delivers a 3.51% target FFR, coinciding with a three-quarters percentage point cut in the current target rate. The following chart shows the effect of increasing the Mankiw Factor to 1.85:

No matter what this month, we'll soon find out how far the Fed is willing turn up the dial to stimulate the economy in 2008.

Welcome to the blogosphere's toolchest! Here, unlike other blogs dedicated to analyzing current events, we create easy-to-use, simple tools to do the math related to them so you can get in on the action too! If you would like to learn more about these tools, or if you would like to contribute ideas to develop for this blog, please e-mail us at:

Materials on this website are published by Political Calculations to provide visitors with free information and insights regarding the incentives created by the laws and policies described. However, this website is not designed for the purpose of providing legal, medical or financial advice to individuals. Visitors should not rely upon information on this website as a substitute for personal legal, medical or financial advice. While we make every effort to provide accurate website information, laws can change and inaccuracies happen despite our best efforts. If you have an individual problem, you should seek advice from a licensed professional in your state, i.e., by a competent authority with specialized knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case.