Hehe, molecular data has already suggested that either the Polar Bear should be regarded as a subspecies of Ursus arctos or the latter would be paraphyletic. And now this molecular evidence is apparently supported by previously unknown morphological characters, too... or is that phenotypic plasticity?

That last one sort of reminds me of that Honey Badger video I saw a while ago.

There are a few more on youtube, but some of them are a bit sweary, so I'm hesitant to share them here. If you don't mind foul language though, check out some of the others, the 'true facts about sloth' is enjoyable