I know I've read in the past that MPC re-tests its Zero Point Machine with every comparison; and because of this, the test results vary from test to test. I get that.

But I don't get the massive differences I saw on the Zero Point benchmarks when I compared p69 to p74 (of the March 2012 issue). It may not look pretty, but below is a comparison of the benchmarks (REMEMBER: These are each for the Zero Point Machine):

The numbers listed on pg. 69 are correct, and are the same numbers used for the zero-point machine in other issues. Unfortunately, different numbers were incorrectly inserted instead of the normal zero-point numbers. But the benchmark graphs correctly show the difference the iBuypower Erebus and the zero-point machine.. i.e. zero-point Vegas Pro number is 3,049.. the Erebus number is 1,730.. the graph has the Erebus winning by around 75%.. 3,049 divided by 1,730 = 1.76 or a 76% increase over the zero-point. The graphs correctly show the Erebus being faster in all the benchmarks, it is just the incorrect zero-point numbers were listed.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum