The media has remained silent about Live Action’s investigative report and docuseries,Aiding Abusers, which documents the decades-long child sexual abuse cover-up by taxpayer funded Planned Parenthood. The horrific criminal cases, civil lawsuits, and health department records alone — some recently uncovered by Live Action and some published previously by other pro-life organizations — are, in and of themselves, substantial evidence showing Planned Parenthood’s disregard for victims of child sexual abuse. Add to that Live Action’s undercover investigations, along with testimonies from former Planned Parenthood staffers who witnessed Planned Parenthood’s complicity in failing to report suspicion of abuse, and the proof is overwhelming.

In addition to the Planned Parenthood-supportive media, organizations and individuals who praised the MeToo and TimesUp movements are also silent. An obvious example can be seen in an article published by pro-abortion Rewire News, which claims its goal is to “[…] foster public knowledge and enlightenment through high-quality evidence-based news, analysis, commentary, and investigative reporting….”

However, while one might expect a level of bias from Rewire News, author Katelyn Burns exhibited not a hint of true journalism in her piece, “Republicans Coordinate With Discredited Anti-Choice Group to Call for Planned Parenthood Investigation.” As I read Burns’ piece, I wrongly anticipated that Burns might mention, with some level of empathy, the victims of sexual abuse, some as young as twelve years old, taken by their abusers to Planned Parenthood and then returned back to the abusers for additional suffering. I assumed Rewire might issue some level of rebuke, token of disdain or outrage regarding theses horrific cases. I assumed Burns might conclude that something is wrong at Planned Parenthood, and side, not with the big corporation, but with actual sexual abuse victims.

I was wrong.

Instead of examining all the evidence presented by Live Action, Burns was hyper-focused on the two undercover investigations conducted by Live Action, which (according to media reports) resulted in the firing of at least twoPlanned Parenthood staffers and one being put on probation by their state’s Department of Health. Without citing any evidence, except a lazy link to a Huffington Post article which made a false claim about a completely separate Live Action investigation, Burns called the undercover stings “discredited and extensively edited ‘sting’ footage.” Burns was so unable to see through her bias that she failed to even acknowledge more than two-thirds of Live Action’s evidence. In so doing, Burns completely disregarded sexual abuse victims like Denise Fairbanks, who, as Live Action detailed, was forced by her rapist to have an abortion. Denise’s cries for help were then — according to the victim, not Live Action — ignored by Planned Parenthood.

Denise told Planned Parenthood she was raped and they did NOTHING (Image credit: Live Action Twitter page)

Burns also disregarded the sexual abuse victim of predator George Savanah, who, according to the criminal caseagainst him, brought his young victim to Planned Parenthood not once, not twice, but on three separate occasions, and each time it appears that Planned Parenthood returned her to her abuser.

George Savanah impregnates daughter three times and takes her to Planned Parenthood

The cases in Live Action’s report are horrific and are most likely the reason Burns selectively left them out and made a deliberate decision to be a propagandist for Planned Parenthood rather than a true investigative journalist. Another reason might be because on the Rewire News board of directors is none other than Bryan Howard, CEO of Planned Parenthood Arizona. Live Action conducted two of undercover stings in Arizona, and Live Action’s report contains details of a criminal case involving Planned Parenthood in Arizona.

In that case, Planned Parenthood allegedly told a 15-year-old rape victim it wasn’t worth the “hassle” for them to report her rape to police, then also allegedly miscoded the incident as “consensual” sex.

Image taken from Tyler Kost police report

OOPS!

I guess Burns saw no need to reveal this conflict of interest.

We have seen this kind of selective reporting before, when NBC News squashed Ronan Farrow’s initial report regarding the predatory behavior of Harvey Weinstein. Last month, Farrow told Recode Decode, “The fact that there was a veil of silence around the Harvey Weinstein story for decades is not accidental, and there were a variety of systems that kept it silent…. The question of the complicity of the media and the role the media played in keeping this quiet for as long as it was quiet, are important ones.” He added:

I think one reason why I structured those stories… around systems rather than individuals, is because the systems still have a long way to go…. This was a story about the abuse of power and the way in which the most powerful people in this country can manipulate the press, manipulate the judicial and legal process…. These are systems that are still be used every day.

Now, Planned Parenthood’s complicity of silence is shamefully doing the exact same thing, but just as in the Weinsteincase and other abuse cases, truth cannot be silenced. It will eventually come out.

This article is reprinted with permission. The original appeared here at Live Action News.

The radical pro-abortion group, Stop Patriarchy, which claims to be a revolutionary / communist organization is planning to converge in Jackson, Mississippi after causing havoc in several other cities this month.

Their goal – to defend the last remaining abortion clinic in the state.

Despite their faux rhetoric that when abortion is illegal, women die, Stop Patriarchy is planning to support Diane Derzis who owns Jackson Women’s Health Organization abortion clinic despite her abysmal record of care.

Derzis’ Birmingham, Alabama abortion clinic was closed after a 76-page health deficiency report and several women were rushed out of her facility by ambulance due to her alleged “care.”

Stop Patriarchy has defended this abortion mill before, after all, when you are pro-abortion you really don’t care about life or the women entering these shoddy facilities.

WEEKEND OF JULY 25-26: Die-in for Abortion Rights. Street theater with bloody pants, bloody coat hangers and the pictures of women who died from illegal abortion. Get out Abortion Rights Fact Sheets and calls to come to Jackson, Mississippi in August to fight for abortion rights at the last clinic in the state. Hold send-off dinners and events for volunteers traveling to the last abortion clinic in Mississippi.

JULY 31 – AUGUST 9:
Join Stop Patriarchy in Jackson, Mississippi!
We will boldly take out the full mission of Stop Patriarchy throughout the city of Jackson, stirring and drawing new people into the fight against all forms of female enslavement. And we will join with organizers in the area to build support for the last abortion clinic in the state, the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and to build support for Abortion On Demand and Without Apology!

Sadly, despite the fact that many women still die from legal abortion and abortion workers sexually abuse women inside legal abortion facilities, Stop Patriarchy has included abortion restrictions in their “War on Women” displays.

While there are some issues we would agree, such as the devastation porn has on women or speaking out against so-called “honor killings”, and rape, this radical group has also included “Church” and “anti-abortion” in their “war on women boots” display. A ridiculous claim since the majority of pro-lifers ARE women and many of them have denounced abortion as harmful to women.

Pro-lifers may want to be aware of the in your face way these communist revolutionaries get their message across by clicking on the Stop Patriarchy category on this blog to see how they will harass pro-life people, shut down traffic, protest churches, and break the law.

A Planned Parenthood video on so-called “abortion stigma” portrays women as weak and incapable of criticism and of being unable to feel confident in their so-called liberating choice to have an abortion.

According to the video, any feeling of guilt or remorse by women purchasing the child killing service is because of outside forces.

While at the same time, the abortion industry wants you to believe that the woman’s desire to have an abortion is all from her and not pressure from a family member or a counselor who takes pay to sell the procedure.

As I analyze Planned Parenthood’s “abortion-stigma” video, I conclude that they are painting women as weak.

“She may feel uncomfortable about asking someone to accompany her to the clinic,” the video states, “or watch her kids out of fear of being judged.”

“She may have to work extra hours, borrow money, or sell her belongings…” says Planned Parenthood.

Solution to this problem? Tax funded abortion of course.

You see, the “I never saw an abortion I could not profit from” organization wants abortion to be a private decision between a woman and her doctor, until, that is, it is time to cash out. Then, and only then, can the taxpayer have a say.

“Many states have additional laws that reinforce the idea that abortion is morally wrong and socially unacceptable,” the video continues.

“When a woman arrives at the health center for her appointment she might encounter anti-abortion protesters shouting at her…” they state.

And what might these “protesters” say?

Some may be warning them that women who go to Planned Parenthood sometimes die and end up at the morgue. Like Tonya Reaves died after Planned Parenthood left her bleeding for 5 hours before transferring her to the hospital, where she drew her last breath. Reaves’ “abortion stigma” is now permanent.

The video then claims that regulated state mandated information is incorrect a point I would strongly differ on, “And, once inside the clinic, she may have to go over incorrect state mandated information about abortion,” they state.

Really, Planned Parenthood?

Are women that unable to cope with their own private decisions – or- do they come to the profit making abortion clinic uncertain?

In which case, all those so-called laws you spoke about should actually assist her in the event she wants to change her mind because of her uncertainty.

“It’s also important to consider what might happen to a woman after her abortion,” Planned Parenthood says.

Yep…like….a ride in the ambulance perhaps because of a serious botch job or complication?

But, what Planned Parenthood was referring to with that statement were those pesky free speech statements on TV, the media or billboards that women see that allegedly add to her feelings of uncertainty – because- as I stated- Planned Parenthood is painting women as weak and unable to stand confidently on their own decisions.

____________________________________________________

But, Planned Parenthood doesn’t end by just explaining the “abortion stigma” of women seeking abortions, allegedly, according to the abortion clinic chain, women are not the only weak ones here.

Apparently, abortion providers or as Planned Parenthood paints it, “people who work in abortion care” also feel this so-called stigma.

I guess if an abortionist is BIG enough and TOUGH enough to suck an innocent baby from the womb shouldn’t they be able to handle so-called “abortion stigma?”

No way- not according to Planned Parenthood which states:

“They may feel unsupported by family or friends and separate from their neighbors and community. This type of relationship damage can impact health creating feelings of isolation and even workplace burnout.”

Oh NO!

We can’t allow abortion doctors to get burned out and QUIT can we? I speak sarcastically, of course.

“They may have to enter their workplace everyday hearing that their work is unwelcome in their community. Abortion clinic staff may feel that other medical providers see their work as illegitimate or unimportant…”

Uh…yeah !

“Abortion staff can sometimes feel as though their colleagues who don’t work in abortion services don’t understand what they go through day-to-day and that colleagues may unintentionally add to their experiences stigma,” Planned Parenthood says.

Oh…please!

So, let’s recap.

If a woman or an abortion worker feels “abortion stigma” it is because of me or you or TV or the media- or the community- or the church- or billboards- or free speech – or – everyone else except them.

How ridiculous !

As I like to state, “Abortion stigma is between a woman and her abortion provider – ONLY!”

In yet another attempt to normalize abortion a speaker at the TED talks tries to describe abortion shame by saying that we are not born ashamed of it.

The talk was supposed to help the TED audience understand “shame” and specifically “abortion shame.”

Because – if sucking a child limb from limb in the womb is nothing not be ashamed of, then the abortion industry can continue along unhindered.

“We actually aren’t born feeling ashamed of anything,” she explains.

“We’re not ashamed of our nakedness.”

Okay, I will give her that.

“We’re not ashamed of our bodily functions or our sexual desires…”

Uh, what?

“Sexual desires?” is she saying that when we are born we have sexual desires?

It gets worse:

Apparently, according to this speaker, when we are born we are also not ashamed of “reproduction or abortion.”

Wow- that’s a first !

Seems to me that a baby who has just been born is probably pretty excited (and I don’t mean sexually excited) that he or she made it without actually being aborted.

According to this “brilliant”, purveyor of all things true, shame invokes the fear of disconnection because a woman who feels shame from an abortion feels that society will shun her in some way.

You see that, according to the “shameless” abortion promoter, the shame women feel from killing their own children in an abortion comes from the “community” which is acting as a “shame stoker” who is “judging” women.

Of course, in listening to the speaker, it is society who should feel “shame” for the shunning – but the woman is not to feel “shame” for her act of murder. And, this speaker is of course, not “shaming” society for their “shaming,” because if she were – she would be a hypocrite and we all know, abortion advocates are anything but hypocritical, right?

Are you following this?

For those interested, the speaker also claims that one and three women have abortion, regardless of their alleged “shame.”

But, according to Lauren Enriquez, the myth that 1 in 3 women have abortions persists despite hard evidence to the contrary and she explains why – here.

One thing these advocates of “shameless abortion” often do, is to block out the experiences of women who regret their abortions. Because, to the advocates of abortion – the only abortion experience a woman should not feel ashamed of is one that praises it.

She ends her Talk by comparing those who oppose “abortion shame” to those who opposed the Nazis. You remember them, that group of savages who placed innocent Jews and others in ovens slaughtering millions of them after labeling them sub-human?

If you cannot see the comparison, think of it this way: if you place your unborn child in the hands of an abortionist to be slaughtered, that is nothing to be ashamed of.

Still confused? So am I….

In fact, I think the speaker should be ashamed of herself for even suggesting such a thing.

Dr. Julie Madsen was testifying in opposition to an Idaho bill, which would prevent doctors from prescribing abortion medication via telemedicine.

Dr. Madsen said at the hearing that she’d had some colonoscopy patients swallow small devices to let doctors examine their colons.

Then Rep. Vito Barbieri, R-Dalton Gardens, who supported the bill asked, “Can this same procedure then be done in a pregnancy? Swallowing a camera and helping the doctor determine what the situation is?”

Dr. Julie Madsen replied that would be anatomically impossible because swallowed pills do not end up in the vagina.

Rep. Barbieri replied, “fascinating.”

After his statements went viral, Rep. Barbieri, told KTVB he wasn’t being serious when he asked a doctor whether a woman could swallow a small camera for a gynecological exam.

Vito Barbieri clarified his statement, “So all I was doing was asking a rhetorical question, and I probably should have had a little bit more sarcastic or rhetorical tone to my inflection, but I was merely trying to illicit the response that I got, which is they’re not comparable, obviously,” he said. “You’re not going to take a tablet to determine the condition of the woman’s pregnancy.”

Recently, dash cam video and a witness video emerged in the shooting death of Walter Scott by a South Carolina police officer, which has outraged just about everyone.

Others expressed outrage for the death of Michael Brown who was shot by Officer Wilson and Eric Garner in New York whose brutal death during his arrest was also caught on camera.

But, what is just as shocking, is that for many years – the police have been more than brutal to pro-life demonstrators with not even a whisper of condemnation by the left. This blog post is not an attack on police. I support police in most cases. But- when abuse occurs – we must speak out.

What this blog does expose is the hypocrisy of the left and specifically the Clinton administration (Hillary Clinton included) who sat by and watched police brutalize pro-lie people for many years.

During the 1980’s and 1990’s members of the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue blocked the doors of abortion facilities across the country. They felt it was their moral duty to peacefully place their own bodies between the abortion doors and the child that was to be murdered. Just as in the Civil Rights Movement for Blacks, there were many members of the clergy, women, children and men from all walks of life who took part in these pro-life rescues.

A documentary film compiled several instances of police brutality and even though the liberal media was present at many of these protests they remained silent. Police used mace and various torture methods including numb chucks on peaceful pro-life demonstrators pictured below:

As a journalist myself, I attended several events where I personally witnessed police removing their badges just before they brutalized pro-lifers:

If a person breaks the law – they should face the consequences. For the pro-lifers they understood that their actions would result in arrest and jail time. However, when they were tortured by the police and the progressives on the left said nothing it showed me that they did not care about police brutality.

Today, the left is parading themselves around as some sort of savior exposing the evil of a run-away justice system. That is a lie. For those of us who witnessed brutality on a regular basis when we exercised our Constitutional right of redress we know what hypocrites the left can be. The question remains, does the public know this as well?