Re: We should bump WC format version number for 1.5.

On 10/4/07, Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:
> "Daniel L. Rall" <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> writes:
> >> Hmmm, it seems init_adm() does take a 'depth' parameter, so we might
> >> be able to swing this. I'll spend a few hours on it. If it's done by
> >> the end of that, great; if not, I'll at least know whether doing it is
> >> hard or easy.
> >
> > Don't bother. As painful as it is, we have to bump the format number.
>
> Sigh. I think I have to agree. There might be weird and surprising
> behaviors if different subdirs in your working copy were to have
> different format numbers. It just seems like a Bad Road to go down.

Hey! If I had know that, I'd have proposed (and implemented) some
changes to how we record directory delete/replace in the working copy.
It's too short until Oct 12 now! I explicitly held back doing the
changes to prevent WC version bump in 1.5!