The struggle we Whites are in for our survival, expansion and liberation from oppression is similar in some respects to the struggles of other peoples, but it also has some differences.

Even the fact that many of our White kind aren't aware that they are being oppressed is similar to the this same lack of knowledge of some other peoples including non-White peasants in various nations and even Blacks in the U.S.

One of the main differences between the oppression of non-Whites and ours is that many non-Whites look different from their oppressors as the oppressors are mostly light skinned or white skinned. As Whites, however, we don't always have such easy visual cues to see who is oppressing us, as most of those in power and who are either behind our oppression or are enabling it, even if passively, look pretty much like us. Even the Jews in power look much like us, even though they are not like us, but they look enough like us so that they can blend in with Whites who are genetically our kind and can invisibly work for their own interests and against our best interests by networking with powerful and elite non-Jewish Whites who foolishly have little compunction against oppressing Whites who are not in their elite circles. Ironically, even these White elites or their children suffer from the oppression that they often foist on us or enable against us, but they are often as blind and deceived about the nature of the oppression as are ordinary non-elite Whites.

At the core of the oppression we face as Whites is the wish of White-haters to blend all races, all religions and all nations together. Some of them truly think this blended human population is a good thing and they deny it is genocide, But, genocide it is.

This White genocide that we are witnessing daily is being done in a way that many of our people don't even see it as such and think it is just the natural and proper way the planet is evolving. It is neither. There are those who are trying to erase us from existence.

To blend all races together, the White-haters are doing a number of things at the same time. Thus, they are importing millions and millions of non-Whites into formerly all White lands. This increases the non-White genes in the gene pool. At the same time, massive PR efforts are being made to convince Whites that race doesn't exist and that we should deny what our eyes, our science, our common sense and our instincts tell us; which is that race is real and that if you blend Whites with non-Whites the product will always be non-Whites and never Whites.

And, in addition to the PR efforts to weaken White resolve to stay White, laws are being passed to force Whites to mix with non-Whites. With the low White birthrate, what happens as our White youth come of age is that they find the gene pool filled with many non-White alternatives and fewer potential White mates and this leads to miscegenation. So, when a White miscegenates, not only does he or she then help produce more non-Whites, they fail to produce Whites and they break the White genetic chain from their ancestors to themselves and turn their families non-White. Then, when the non-White children of the White and non-White miscegenationists come of age, they are often more acceptable to Whites who are also coming of age, as many of the former will have enough White features and personality characteristics to be attractive to pure Whites seeking mates but finding few Whites to mate with. This increases the miscegenation and the production of more mixed children. It is an evolutionary downward spiral for Whites that leads to extinction of Whites as pure Whites and it is a genetic return to Africa for Whites who evolved away from the African human type thousands of years ago.

Whites are the particular targets and are the most vulnerable humans in this massive genocide of blending all humans together for a few reasons. First, Whites are seen as the major impediment to blending. This is so because many Whites still like being White and not only see no advantage in letting their families become non-White, but actively don't want it. They want to remain White. So, these are the ones who must be broken down and blended away first. Second, because Whites are the new human type on this planet--having evolved as recognizable Whites perhaps no longer back than 60,000 years ago, and with many now common White physical and mental characteristics only having evolved within the last 3,000 to 5,000 years--we have a less fixed genome than non-Whites and this is why many White characteristics are recessive and why a child of a White and a non-White can never be truly White. In simple terms, it takes a White mother and a White father each contributing 23 White chromosomes to produce a new fully White child with the full 46 White chromosomes that makes a White person. On the other hand, it only takes one non-White mating with a White to produce a non-White child.

Using psychology against us

It is fairly well accepted among psychologists and sociologists that advertising, public relations, the media, laws and court decisions can change hearts and minds of Whites who might believe in staying White in all ways. They use these to cause a change in behavior and then when behavior changes, attitudes follow. We see this all the time. Whites may object to being forced to have non-Whites in their groups, and then when laws are passed forcing Whites to accept non-Whites, for example, the Whites change their attitudes and accept the non-Whites.

You'll often hear Whites in the first stages of the attitude change say "It's the law." Later, these same Whites may tell you that it is right or just and we're all just human. It also works with accepting gays, or any other group. As far as gays go--which may give an easier to understand example of the attitude change process--just look at the Christian churches that are disregarding Biblical teachings against homosexuality and which are even marrying gay couples. Just a few years ago, many of these same churches would have been against such things. What happened? Gay activists became militant and got the media, the politicians and the courts to support gay rights. Then, with these behavior changes from these reference groups (more about this below), many Christians changed their attitudes. Yesterday, they were opposed to gay marriages, today they welcome them. The same thing happened earlier with Blacks. Yesterday, Blacks had their place and Whites had their place, today, it's all the same place. What happened? Blacks became militant and got the media, the politicians and the courts to support Black civil rights. See the pattern? Understand what we Whites must do?

This is just basic human psychology: Change the behavior (by law and by force if necessary) and the attitudes will soon also change. Of course, this also works in reverse but to a lesser extent. In actuality, this is much like method acting. An actor, trying to convey an attitude will often do the behavior of that attitude first and the attitude (or at least the appearance of that attitude) will follow. The well known example of this is an actor who wants to convey a facial expression and body mannerisms of being shot with a gun. Now, few actors have actually experienced being shot by a gun, so how do they make it look real? They can imagine stepping into a shower that is ice cold when they expected it to be warm. The audience will then usually think the actor has done a great acting job of looking like he had been shot by a gun when all he was doing was using his emotional memory of the cold shower.

The lesson: We Whites must ACT. We must change our behavior by actually getting involved physically in promoting our White interests. This could take the form of handing out literature, holding signs, attending White meetings, etc. It will take more than just commenting on the internet for this to really get Whites fired up. Do the action and the attitude will follow. And when enough Whites do act, and get the high moral ground for standing up against White genocide, other Whites will join. That's what happened with the Black Civil rights movement. When Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat and move to the rear of the bus in Alabama, she performed a behavior, then the press picked up on it and spread the word. At first, other Blacks laughed at her and many felt she was harming Blacks by forcing the issue--and that, by the way--is a typical attitude in an oppressed population when such a behavior first occurs that upsets things. Why? Because the reference group to which the oppressed look for what is right and wrong is often controlled by the oppressors. In this case, the reference group was Whites and the law at that time. So, many Blacks took a cue in their attitude from Whites and the law about Rosa Parks being wrong. However, her behavior was increasingly seen as moral and just and then more and more Blacks started looking to other Blacks as their reference group and their attitudes changed.

My point here is that we Whites are at the same place where Blacks were before Rosa Parks and we're also at the same place before Gays became militant and demanded that they be treated like everyone else.

RID YOURSELF OF NEGATIVE SELF-IMAGES

Too many Whites suffer from negative self and group images and lack self and group esteem and many have internalized a subtle self-hate. This is often seen in Whites failing to demand the right to be White. Specifically, as I wrote in an earlier essay, there are, in the California legislature (and I'm sure in many other states as well) a Black Legislative Caucus, a Hispanic Legislative Caucus, an Asian-Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus and even a Jewish Legislative Caucus, but there is no White Legislative Caucus.

When I've brought up this lack of a White Legislative Caucus with other Whites, I've often received a response indicating that they are unperturbed by this and not at all concerned. Some even thought it would be racist for Whites to have such a caucus. These attitudes are exactly what one expects from an oppressed group of people who, in addition to relying on anti-White reference group attitudes, also have negative self-images and low self-esteem both of themselves and of other Whites. And, they often got these negative views by internalizing the views of their reference groups. Too many Whites today are internalizing the negative views of elite Whites, Jews, non-Whites, the media, and anti-White laws as our reference groups and reference points instead of internalizing the psychologically healthy attitudes of our real reference group which we can call by a variety of names such as White Nationalists, Race Realists, Awakened Whites, etc.

In simple terms, we are looking for our cues as to who we are and how we should be and how we should act and what attitude we should have in all the wrong places and we are coming away with negative views of ourselves that are often subtle and which manifest themselves as I wrote above in Whites being oblivious to the oppression and being non-assertive for White rights and even for our natural right to be as we are as Whites, to live among our own kind with no interference from other kinds and to seek our happiness as we rationally believe it to be.

You and I and all other Whites have a natural RIGHT to be White in all ways that we think are important and no one has a right to take that right away from us. We own this planet as much as any other human being or group of human beings including governments. They have no greater rights that we do. We must always act in the best interests of Whites and never in the best interests of non-Whites. Why? Because they are competing with us subconsciously as their genes try to kill off and replace our genes with theirs. This is the way of nature. Do not deny it. Do not hate it. Learn to love the struggle that we are in, because we can win it if we start living every minute of our lives as intentional Whites.

OPPRESSION: Any situation in which others keep one from his or her pursuit of rational self-affirmation.

GENOCIDE: UN LEGAL Definition: The International Convention of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on December 9, 1948 set the United Nations definition of genocide: General Assembly Resolution 260A (III) Article 2 In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. BIOLOGICAL definition: Killing a distinct type of organism's genes or replacing its genes with the genes of a different, but often related, type of organism. This can be done by mass immigration of a different type into the environment of the type being destroyed.

GENOME: An organisms complete set of DNA, including all of its genes. Each genome contains all of the information needed to build and maintain that organism. In humans, a copy of the entire genome--with more than 3 billion DNA base pairs is contained in all cells that have a nucleus.

REFERENCE GROUP/REFERENCE POINT: Any group or authority (media, laws, etc.) to which a individual looks for cues on how he should compare, judge and decide upon his opinions and behaviors.

# # #

THREE BOOKS BY HARD TO PIGEONHOLE H. MILLARD

All three books are now listed on Amazon.com.
Just click on the "http://www..." links after each book.
They're also available at quality brick and mortar stores or can be ordered by them for you.

The lefties at the OC WEEKLY said Millard is one of OC's most frightening people.

"Millard is an important writer" New Nation News

"Millard is an original. His books aren't like your typical fiction.
If you don't know where to put his books, try the same shelf with Kerouac,
Kafka, Sartre and Nietzsche" - a reader.

"I consider H. Millard one of the most brilliant writers and analysts
in the European American civil rights movement."
- David Duke

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack's Religion
messages of ennui and meaning in post-american america by H. Millard
In Ourselves Alone and Homeless Jack's Religion, H. Millard, the hard to pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category bending commentaries on post-American America. The commentaries deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics in Millard's edgy style and lead up to Homeless Jack's Religion, in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. Browse Before You BuyISBN: 0-595-32646-3