Mark Levin: ‘Unbridled Immigration, Legal and Illegal, Is Taking the Country Down’. * * *
*
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington Times

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

OBAMA FIGURES THAT WHILE HE SQUANDERS BILLIONS FOR BUSH'S WARS FOR SAUDIS BORDERS, HE WILL SAVE A FEW BUCKS BY SABOTAGING OUR HOMELAND SECURITY.

SUCH WILL ASSURE EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS HORDES MORE WORKERS, AND THE LA RAZA PRESIDENT WITH MUCHO MAS UNREGISTERED VOTERS!

SMITH: Obama
budget’s backdoor amnesty

President’s spending plan weakens
immigration enforcement

By Rep.
Lamar Smith

-

The
Washington Times

Thursday,
February 23, 2012

President
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget came out this month and again includes the same
spending, borrowing and taxing policies that have come to define his
presidency. No surprise, this spending blueprint cuts several worthwhile
immigration-enforcement and border-security programs.

The
president's budget continues his administration's policies of ignoring laws
requiring the removal of illegal immigrants. Last year, the Obama
administration issued new deportation guidelines that amount to backdoor
amnesty. The spending priorities contained in his budget are no different. At least
the president is consistent.

Under
his budget for 2013, Mr. Obama reduces the number of detention bed spaces by
1,200 beds - from 34,000 to 32,800. The administration proposes using the
resulting funds to enhance its alternatives-to-detention programs. But these
programs result in higher levels of illegal immigrants disappearing into
American communities.

In
fact, Department of Justice records reveal that since 1996, 40 percent of all
non-detained illegal immigrants in removal proceedings simply became fugitives.
Unfortunately, the president's budget builds on this record of failure.
Detention is the only proven method of preventing illegal immigrants from
avoiding deportation.

The
president's spending proposal also reduces funding for the 287(g) program by 25
percent. The 287(g) program allows state and local governments to partner with
the federal government to assist in the enforcement of immigration laws. This
successful program has identified tens of thousands of illegal immigrants in
prisons and jails nationwide.

The
Obama administration also has announced that it will no longer consider
additional requests for 287(g) partnerships. It makes no sense to get rid of
such a valuable program.

Mr.
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget request also undermines border security and national
security. Last year, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found
that just 44 percent of the Southwestern border was under the operational
control of the Border Patrol. Most of the border remains porous to human
smugglers, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants.

Rather
than take steps to gain control of the U.S.-Mexico border, the president's
budget contains a plan to develop a "border security index" to
measure enforcement progress along the Southwestern border. The administration
thinks this new test will help manipulate the facts to produce a passing grade
for the administration and back its claims that the border is secure.

But
this index is just a cover-up for the administration's failure to fully enforce
immigration laws. There is no substitute for improved border security coupled
with increased interior enforcement of drug and immigration laws.

The
president's budget also contains no funding for the implementation of the Real
ID Act. But this comes as no surprise because the administration already has
delayed this law from taking effect until January 2013. Real ID prohibits
illegal immigrants, including foreign terrorists, from obtaining valid forms of
identification that can be used to board planes and enter federal buildings.
Real ID already has been law for six years and should be fully implemented.
This is another example of the administration not enforcing current laws.

The
president's spending blueprint contains no funding for expansion of the Visa
Security Program (VSP). This program increases the security of the visa process
at U.S. embassies and consulates in "highest-risk" countries. At
visa-issuing posts where VSP exists, all applicants receive additional
screening. Unfortunately, such screening exists only at 19 locations out of a
list of about 50 designated "highest-risk" posts worldwide. Not
expanding the VSP makes it easier for terrorists to get visas to the United
States.

We must secure our borders to prevent national security threats from
becoming reality. It's past time to construct a budget that reduces illegal
immigration and increases border security. The president's budget takes us in
the wrong direction.

Rep.
Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

President
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget came out this month and again includes the same
spending, borrowing and taxing policies that have come to define his
presidency. No surprise, this spending blueprint cuts several worthwhile
immigration-enforcement and border-security programs.

The
president's budget continues his administration's policies of ignoring laws
requiring the removal of illegal immigrants. Last year, the Obama
administration issued new deportation guidelines that amount to backdoor
amnesty. The spending priorities contained in his budget are no different. At least
the president is consistent.

Under
his budget for 2013, Mr. Obama reduces the number of detention bed spaces by
1,200 beds - from 34,000 to 32,800. The administration proposes using the
resulting funds to enhance its alternatives-to-detention programs. But these
programs result in higher levels of illegal immigrants disappearing into
American communities.

In
fact, Department of Justice records reveal that since 1996, 40 percent of all
non-detained illegal immigrants in removal proceedings simply became fugitives.
Unfortunately, the president's budget builds on this record of failure.
Detention is the only proven method of preventing illegal immigrants from
avoiding deportation.

The
president's spending proposal also reduces funding for the 287(g) program by 25
percent. The 287(g) program allows state and local governments to partner with
the federal government to assist in the enforcement of immigration laws. This
successful program has identified tens of thousands of illegal immigrants in
prisons and jails nationwide.

The
Obama administration also has announced that it will no longer consider
additional requests for 287(g) partnerships. It makes no sense to get rid of
such a valuable program.

Mr.
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget request also undermines border security and national
security. Last year, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found
that just 44 percent of the Southwestern border was under the operational
control of the Border Patrol. Most of the border remains porous to human
smugglers, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants.

Rather
than take steps to gain control of the U.S.-Mexico border, the president's
budget contains a plan to develop a "border security index" to
measure enforcement progress along the Southwestern border. The administration
thinks this new test will help manipulate the facts to produce a passing grade
for the administration and back its claims that the border is secure.

But
this index is just a cover-up for the administration's failure to fully enforce
immigration laws. There is no substitute for improved border security coupled
with increased interior enforcement of drug and immigration laws.

The
president's budget also contains no funding for the implementation of the Real
ID Act. But this comes as no surprise because the administration already has
delayed this law from taking effect until January 2013. Real ID prohibits
illegal immigrants, including foreign terrorists, from obtaining valid forms of
identification that can be used to board planes and enter federal buildings.
Real ID already has been law for six years and should be fully implemented.
This is another example of the administration not enforcing current laws.

The
president's spending blueprint contains no funding for expansion of the Visa
Security Program (VSP). This program increases the security of the visa process
at U.S. embassies and consulates in "highest-risk" countries. At
visa-issuing posts where VSP exists, all applicants receive additional
screening. Unfortunately, such screening exists only at 19 locations out of a
list of about 50 designated "highest-risk" posts worldwide. Not
expanding the VSP makes it easier for terrorists to get visas to the United
States.

We must secure our borders to prevent national security threats from
becoming reality. It's past time to construct a budget that reduces illegal
immigration and increases border security. The president's budget takes us in
the wrong direction.

Rep.
Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

THIS IS OBAMA’S REAL BAILOUT OFG.M.:“The record profits owelargely to the cuts imposed on auto workers in the United States and Canada,under the auspices of the United Auto Workers and Canadian Auto Workers unions,including a new starting wage of barely $14 an hour, half the basic wage forlongtime workers, and cuts in health benefits, pensions and health care forretirees.”GM posts record profits, preparesmore cutsBy Patrick Martin18 February 2012GeneralMotors reported a record $7.6 billion profit for 2011 Thursday, but the largestUS automaker made clear that it would continue to pursue cuts in jobs, wagesand benefits for its worldwide workforce, with the direct assistance of theUnited Auto Workers.Itwas the eighth consecutive quarterly profit for the company since its forcedbankruptcy in 2009, but the smallest during that period, a signal that furthercost-cutting measures will be demanded by the financial markets. Worldwiderevenues rose 11 percent to $150.3 billion, but profits soared 62 percentcompared to 2010.

Plant
closings resulting from Monday’s forced bankruptcy of General Motors will cause
spiraling unemployment and deep cuts in social services in many cities and
states across the country. The Obama administration, whose Auto Task Force
dictated the terms of the bankruptcy, has offered no serious aid to the
affected workers and their communities.

GM
is carrying out at least 21,000 job cuts and the closure of 14 plants and
warehouses in eight states. In addition, the company has announced its
intention to dump franchise agreements with 2,300 dealerships by the end of
next year. Many of these will be forced to close, eliminating as many as
100,000 jobs in all 50 states.

The
gutting of GM, once the most powerful corporation in the world and a symbol of
US industrial might, will send shock waves through the economy, cascading into
more layoffs at parts suppliers and financial ruin for thousands of small
businesses.

The
bankruptcy will immediately result in state and local cuts in social services,
health care and education, with city and state workers targeted for layoffs,
wages cuts and other concessions. It will accelerate the foreclosure crisis and
further drive down home prices, as tens of thousands of workers are no longer
able to meet their mortgage payments.

The
Obama administration is using the concessions and layoffs, agreed to by the
United Auto Workers, to attack the wages and benefits of the entire working
class. Corporations will take the concessions imposed on auto workers as a
signal for similar measures against their own workers.

SMITH: Obama
budget’s backdoor amnesty

President’s spending plan weakens
immigration enforcement

By Rep.
Lamar Smith

-

The
Washington Times

Thursday,
February 23, 2012

President
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget came out this month and again includes the same
spending, borrowing and taxing policies that have come to define his
presidency. No surprise, this spending blueprint cuts several worthwhile
immigration-enforcement and border-security programs.

The
president's budget continues his administration's policies of ignoring laws
requiring the removal of illegal immigrants. Last year, the Obama
administration issued new deportation guidelines that amount to backdoor
amnesty. The spending priorities contained in his budget are no different. At least
the president is consistent.

Under
his budget for 2013, Mr. Obama reduces the number of detention bed spaces by
1,200 beds - from 34,000 to 32,800. The administration proposes using the
resulting funds to enhance its alternatives-to-detention programs. But these
programs result in higher levels of illegal immigrants disappearing into
American communities.

In
fact, Department of Justice records reveal that since 1996, 40 percent of all
non-detained illegal immigrants in removal proceedings simply became fugitives.
Unfortunately, the president's budget builds on this record of failure.
Detention is the only proven method of preventing illegal immigrants from
avoiding deportation.

The
president's spending proposal also reduces funding for the 287(g) program by 25
percent. The 287(g) program allows state and local governments to partner with
the federal government to assist in the enforcement of immigration laws. This
successful program has identified tens of thousands of illegal immigrants in
prisons and jails nationwide.

The
Obama administration also has announced that it will no longer consider
additional requests for 287(g) partnerships. It makes no sense to get rid of
such a valuable program.

Mr.
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget request also undermines border security and national
security. Last year, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found
that just 44 percent of the Southwestern border was under the operational
control of the Border Patrol. Most of the border remains porous to human
smugglers, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants.

Rather
than take steps to gain control of the U.S.-Mexico border, the president's
budget contains a plan to develop a "border security index" to
measure enforcement progress along the Southwestern border. The administration
thinks this new test will help manipulate the facts to produce a passing grade
for the administration and back its claims that the border is secure.

But
this index is just a cover-up for the administration's failure to fully enforce
immigration laws. There is no substitute for improved border security coupled
with increased interior enforcement of drug and immigration laws.

The
president's budget also contains no funding for the implementation of the Real
ID Act. But this comes as no surprise because the administration already has
delayed this law from taking effect until January 2013. Real ID prohibits
illegal immigrants, including foreign terrorists, from obtaining valid forms of
identification that can be used to board planes and enter federal buildings.
Real ID already has been law for six years and should be fully implemented.
This is another example of the administration not enforcing current laws.

The
president's spending blueprint contains no funding for expansion of the Visa
Security Program (VSP). This program increases the security of the visa process
at U.S. embassies and consulates in "highest-risk" countries. At
visa-issuing posts where VSP exists, all applicants receive additional
screening. Unfortunately, such screening exists only at 19 locations out of a
list of about 50 designated "highest-risk" posts worldwide. Not
expanding the VSP makes it easier for terrorists to get visas to the United
States.

We must secure our borders to prevent national security threats from
becoming reality. It's past time to construct a budget that reduces illegal
immigration and increases border security. The president's budget takes us in
the wrong direction.

Rep.
Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

NO ONE KNOW HOW TO CON AN AMERICAN WORKER THAN THE LA RAZA PRESIDENT THAT HAS SABOTAGED E-VERIFY ALL OVER THE NATION TO PUT ILLGALS IN OUR JOBS AND TURNED HIS DEPT. of LABOR UNDER LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS INTO AN UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICE FOR ILLEGALS!

THIS IS OBAMA’S REAL BAILOUT OF
G.M.:

“The record profits owe
largely to the cuts imposed on auto workers in the United States and Canada,
under the auspices of the United Auto Workers and Canadian Auto Workers unions,
including a new starting wage of barely $14 an hour, half the basic wage for
longtime workers, and cuts in health benefits, pensions and health care for
retirees.”

GM posts record profits, prepares
more cuts

By Patrick Martin
18 February 2012

General
Motors reported a record $7.6 billion profit for 2011 Thursday, but the largest
US automaker made clear that it would continue to pursue cuts in jobs, wages
and benefits for its worldwide workforce, with the direct assistance of the
United Auto Workers.

It
was the eighth consecutive quarterly profit for the company since its forced
bankruptcy in 2009, but the smallest during that period, a signal that further
cost-cutting measures will be demanded by the financial markets. Worldwide
revenues rose 11 percent to $150.3 billion, but profits soared 62 percent
compared to 2010.

ALIPAC supporters in California have done the most to
support this organization, and to fight for immigration enforcement bills in all
states while fighting to help you stop pro illegal alien bills.

Today, we
need ALIPAC supporters in ALL STATES responding quickly, fervently, and
accurately to our activism alert to STOP ILLEGAL ALIENS FROM RECEIVING LICENSES
in California which would devastate our efforts.

ALIPAC's President
William Gheen will be on the Geraldo Rivera radio show on 790 KABC Los Angeles
this morning at 10am Pacific Time to challenge Geraldo's support for licenses
for illegal aliens legislation in California that has recently been
filed.

Please tune in to the show if you can. We need someone to please
make a digital recording of this portion of Geraldo's show for us to share with
others. you can listen on 790am if you are near Los Angeles or from anywhere in
the world via this link

Step 1: Please review our suggested
language for your calls and e-mails. Remember how important it is for you to
craft your own distinct version of our message as bulk electronic communications
will have reduced chances of being effective. Personalizing each call and email
and creating your own version will have maximum effect.

"I am
calling/writing today to ask you to oppose Assemblyman Gil Cedillo's attempt to
give licenses to illegal immigrants. National polls report that 77% of Americans
oppose licenses for illegal aiens and that is why every state in America, except
for 3, have ended the practice. In fact, no state has ever intentionally given
licenses to illegal immigrants. Illegals have exploited loopholes and lax
security, but no state has very specifically tried to aid them with licenses.
Don't let California betray the rest of America! Please stop the licenses for
illegal aliens bill in California! It is a violation of federal law for anyone
to willfully encourage illegal immigrants to enter or remain in the US
unlawfully. Clearly, Cedillo's licenses for illegal aliens bill does that and
will only encourage more illegal immigration into California and America. Please
stand with the three out of four Americans who oppose licenses for illegal
immigrants."

Step 2: Use these simple website links to click your mouse a
few times to access the contact info for members of the California Assembly and
Senate. Focus on calls followed by emails, faxes, and letters! Focus on the
Assembly and then the Senate.

Please use this coordination
link to post any questions or responses from lawmakers, suggestions,
etc....
http://www.alipac.us/f8/william-gheen-vs-geraldo-rivera-today-trying-rescue-california-illegals-251748/#post1262710

ALIPAC
is pleased to announce we now have a state coordinator for California.
MontereySherry will be leading the charge on this effort and will be tracking
legislator response in Sacramento.

President
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget came out this month and again includes the same
spending, borrowing and taxing policies that have come to define his
presidency. No surprise, this spending blueprint cuts several worthwhile
immigration-enforcement and border-security programs.

The
president's budget continues his administration's policies of ignoring laws
requiring the removal of illegal immigrants. Last year, the Obama
administration issued new deportation guidelines that amount to backdoor
amnesty. The spending priorities contained in his budget are no different. At least
the president is consistent.

Under
his budget for 2013, Mr. Obama reduces the number of detention bed spaces by
1,200 beds - from 34,000 to 32,800. The administration proposes using the
resulting funds to enhance its alternatives-to-detention programs. But these
programs result in higher levels of illegal immigrants disappearing into
American communities.

In
fact, Department of Justice records reveal that since 1996, 40 percent of all
non-detained illegal immigrants in removal proceedings simply became fugitives.
Unfortunately, the president's budget builds on this record of failure.
Detention is the only proven method of preventing illegal immigrants from
avoiding deportation.

The
president's spending proposal also reduces funding for the 287(g) program by 25
percent. The 287(g) program allows state and local governments to partner with
the federal government to assist in the enforcement of immigration laws. This
successful program has identified tens of thousands of illegal immigrants in
prisons and jails nationwide.

The
Obama administration also has announced that it will no longer consider
additional requests for 287(g) partnerships. It makes no sense to get rid of
such a valuable program.

Mr.
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget request also undermines border security and national
security. Last year, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found
that just 44 percent of the Southwestern border was under the operational
control of the Border Patrol. Most of the border remains porous to human
smugglers, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants.

Rather
than take steps to gain control of the U.S.-Mexico border, the president's
budget contains a plan to develop a "border security index" to
measure enforcement progress along the Southwestern border. The administration
thinks this new test will help manipulate the facts to produce a passing grade
for the administration and back its claims that the border is secure.

But
this index is just a cover-up for the administration's failure to fully enforce
immigration laws. There is no substitute for improved border security coupled
with increased interior enforcement of drug and immigration laws.

The
president's budget also contains no funding for the implementation of the Real
ID Act. But this comes as no surprise because the administration already has
delayed this law from taking effect until January 2013. Real ID prohibits
illegal immigrants, including foreign terrorists, from obtaining valid forms of
identification that can be used to board planes and enter federal buildings.
Real ID already has been law for six years and should be fully implemented.
This is another example of the administration not enforcing current laws.

The
president's spending blueprint contains no funding for expansion of the Visa
Security Program (VSP). This program increases the security of the visa process
at U.S. embassies and consulates in "highest-risk" countries. At
visa-issuing posts where VSP exists, all applicants receive additional
screening. Unfortunately, such screening exists only at 19 locations out of a
list of about 50 designated "highest-risk" posts worldwide. Not
expanding the VSP makes it easier for terrorists to get visas to the United
States.

We must secure our borders to prevent national security threats from
becoming reality. It's past time to construct a budget that reduces illegal
immigration and increases border security. The president's budget takes us in
the wrong direction.

*

ARIZONA STOPS
THE LA RAZA INVASION. COME TO MEXIFORNIA TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO A STATE OCCUPIED
BY MEXICO! THAT STATE PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS
AND VIRTUALLY ALL JOBS GOT TO HISPANICS! LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUTS OUT AN ADDITIONAL
$600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS.

“But even optimists urged caution. “The primary
magnet that draws people across our border from Mexico is employment,” said Mr.
Allen of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “I think we all recognize that
the real test for us is going to come when the economy turns around in a very
significant way.”

THEY SAY THAT FOR EVERY LA RAZA
THEY CATCH, THERE ARE EIGHT THAT GET THROUGH TO OUR JOBS, “FREE” ANCHOR BABY
BIRTHING AND WELFARE, ALONG WITH OUT A STRAIGHT PATHWAY TO OUR VOTING BOOTHS TO
VOTE MORE LA RAZA DEMS LIKE BARACK OBAMA INTO OFFICE. NO ADMIN IN HISTORY HAS
BEEN SO LA RAZA INFESTED AS OBAMA’S!

They broadly agreed that the decrease in illegal
crossers —down to about 340,000 migrants apprehended in 2011 from a peak of 1.1
million in 2005 — has lightened the workload for the police, but has also
brought worrisome changes in the type of crimes they confront.

PHOENIX — The
impact of steep declines in the number of migrants illegally crossing the
border with Mexico in recent years has
rippled across Arizona and other border states, with federal and local law
enforcement seeing big drops in crime related to illegal immigration.

In Arizona, federal agents have found far fewer drop houses, where
smugglers stash border crossers. Police chiefs in Arizona cities say their
crime rates are low and are falling, along with the numbers and costs of
illegal immigrants coming through their jails.

Federal officials
met with state and local police departments on Tuesday and Wednesday at the
Border Security Expo in the convention hall in downtown Phoenix. They broadly agreed that the decrease in
illegal crossers —down to about 340,000 migrants apprehended in 2011 from a
peak of 1.1 million in 2005 — has lightened the workload for the police, but
has also brought worrisome changes in the type of crimes they confront.

While they no
longer see huge flows of illegal migrants heading for low-wage work in the
United States, federal and local officials said they now faced smaller numbers
of more determined and potentially more dangerous crossers, including migrants carrying illegal drugs.

Sharp differences, even tension, arose between federal officials,
who pointed to statistics and charts showing plummeting illegal entries as the
border was reinforced over the last five years, and some local officers,
particularly sheriffs who patrol the sun-seared expanses of desert in counties
along the international line. (THERE HAS BEEN
A PLUMMET IN CRIMES IN CA WHERE THE WALL IS BUILT, WHICH IS WHY PELOSI AND
OBAMA HAVE STOPPED THE WALL. BOTH WANT TO BUILD THEIR LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF
ILLEGALS AND KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED WITH ILLEGALS. PELOSI HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS
AT HER NAPA WINERY!)

“We’ve got a lot
of rural county, a lot of ranch families, and a lot of those people are living
in fear every day,” said Rodney W. Rothrock, chief deputy sheriff of Cochise
County, which borders Mexico in southeastern Arizona.

A NATION UNDER
INVASION!!!!

In a bright hall
next door to the law enforcement conclave, dozens of technology vendors were
offering the latest military-style tools to make the border even more secure. Contractors
large and small displayed radar devices that can see through walls, thermal
imaging cameras mounted on mobile masts that retract in seconds and unmanned drone boats to scout
rivers too perilous for human navigation.

The face-off
between state and federal officials started with an opening speech on Tuesday
by Arizona’s governor, Jan Brewer, who said federal border
enforcement was an “overarching outrage.” Ms. Brewer, a Republican, is leading
Arizona’s legal fight against the Obama administration over a state law that
would give the police new powers to arrest anyone suspected of being an illegal
immigrant.

In a riposte,
Jayson P. Ahern, a former top official at the Customs and Border Protection
agency, described Ms. Brewer’s criticism as “a very individualized opinion.”
Channeling many officials who were less outspoken because they are still in
federal office, Mr. Ahern said border security had undergone “remarkable
improvements.”

He cited the
expansion of the Border Patrol to more
than 21,000 agents, the highest number in its history, and an array of new
technology that is in use, including remote video surveillance systems and
seven unmanned drones.

Matthew C. Allen,
the special agent in charge of investigations for Immigration and Customs
Enforcement in the state, said 51 migrant smugglers’ drop houses were raided in
Phoenix last year, down from a peak of 186 in 2008. About 800 illegal migrants
were arrested in those raids in 2011, compared with about 3,200 migrants in
2008, Mr. Allen said. (DOESN’T THE PRIOR COMMENT PROVE GOV BREWER’S POINT!!!)

The police chief
of Mesa, just east of Phoenix, said the crime rate was the lowest since the
1960s. The chief, Frank Milstead, said that only about 2 percent of the 17,900
people arrested in Mesa last year were suspected of being illegal immigrants.
“The operational impact on our jails,” he said, “is minimal.”

Raymond Cobos, the sheriff of Luna County, 3,000 square miles of
border scrublands and sierras next door in New Mexico, said his deputies now
arrested an average of eight illegal immigrants a day, down from a daily
average of about 300 three years ago.

Chief Deputy
Rothrock also acknowledged a new reality. In 2010, he said, more than 300
illegal crossers detained by the Border Patrol were turned over to Cochise
County because they were wanted for crimes in the United States. Last year, he
said, the number of illegal crossers with open warrants was seven.

But Chief Deputy
Rothrock warned that Cochise deputies were beginning to encounter “a different
type of illegal alien”: migrants alone or in small groups toting backpacks
loaded with marijuana or methamphetamine. The
migrants often plan to hand off the narcotics to a courier and return quickly
to Mexico, he said.

“A lot of times they take the opportunity to help themselves to
the citizens’ property,” Chief Deputy Rothrock said, breaking into homes. WHILE
BUSH AND OBAMA WERE PUSHING FOR OPEN BORDERS, ARIZONA BECAME THE NEXT LARGEST
CENTER BESIDES MEXICO CITY FOR MEX KIDNAPPING!!! IT REMAINS THE LARGEST CENTER
FOR HOME INVASION AND CAR THEFT!

Jeffrey Scott
Kirkham, the police chief in Nogales, the busiest legal port of entry in
Arizona, said his city’s crime rate was very low, with two homicides in the
last seven years.

But in an arrest
that shocked Chief Kirkham, a high school student was recently found with
nearly four pounds of heroin, worth about $80,000, in his backpack.

Federal
investigators also reported “an alarming increase” in attacks by migrants on
border agents, according to James Turgal, the F.B.I.’s special agent in charge
in Arizona. In 2011, the agency opened investigations of nearly 500 assaults on
federal officers along the Arizona border, from rock-throwing to shootings.
That was more than four times the 117 assaults in 2008, he said.

Federal officials
said they were confident progress would continue, since handling fewer illegal
migrants means they can devote more agents and surveillance equipment to drug
trafficking.

But even optimists urged caution. “The primary magnet that draws
people across our border from Mexico is employment,” said Mr. Allen of
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “I think we all recognize that the real
test for us is going to come when the economy turns around in a very
significant way.”

*Rep.
Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

HOW
TO DESTROY AMERICA: A SPEECH BY GOVERNOR LAMM

By
Frosty WooldridgeFebruary 27, 2012NewsWithViews.com

“The
problems in the world today are so enormous they cannot be solved with the level
of thinking that created them.”
-Einstein

In
the past month, you have read my four part series on the ramifications of adding
100 million immigrants to America within the next 38 years.
I don’t care how you cut it or how you deny it or how you avoid it—this human armada will change the face of America beyond
recognition. None of it will be good, positive or hopeful for America or her
citizens.

That
100 million people fleeing failed states, failed countries and failed
environments will bring enormous poverty and illiteracy as well as cultural and
religious tensions to America that will crack this civilization like
Humpty-Dumpty over the edge of the Grand Canyon. Once those numbers manifest, we
won’t be able to put ourselves back together again.

Back
on October 3, 2003 in Washington DC, I sat dumbfounded at a speech given by
former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm. He spoke on, “How to Destroy America.”
I was the only journalist to report on the speech verbatim. The audience sat
spellbound by the eight methods for destruction of the United
States.
Since that time, my piece on the speech has been circulated all over the world
many times. His speech is being verified in the United Kingdom, France, Norway,
Sweden, Holland, Canada and Australia.

Here
we sit nine years later, and most of what he spoke about has come true and it is
worsening exponentially as we continue absorbing 3.1 million immigrants and
their children annually.I think it’s worth hearing the speech again to give you an ashes-in-
your-mouth sense of the speed of this human juggernaut—brought to you by your
own U.S. Congress and your continued apathy to speak up to stop it. Notice
it’s not on any of the candidates’ list of things to talk about and no ABC
moderator will bring it up. It’s a sacred cow to the media and all
politicians—yet it is destroying this country.

Lamm
said, “If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich,
then let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has
survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great
civilizations rise and fall, and that, “An autopsy of history would show that
all great nations commit suicide.”

“Here
is how they destroyed their countries,” Lamm said. “First, turn America into a
bilingual or multi lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation
can survive the tension, conflict and antagonism of two or more competing
languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual;
however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar
Seymour Lipset put it this way, “The histories of bilingual and bicultural
societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension and tragedy.
Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon—all face crises of national existence in
which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus
have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties
with Basques, Bretons and Corsicans.”

Lamm
continued on how to destroy America, “Invent ‘multiculturalism’ and encourage
immigrants to maintain their own culture. I would make it an article of belief
that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences! I would
make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due to
prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of
bounds.”

Any
fool can see that Los Angeles, Detroit, Chicago, New York and Miami are no
longer American cities. Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, San Francisco and many other
cities are not far behind. Immigrants
arrive at over 3.1 million per year, so fast and so many, that they are not
assimilating into the American Dream.
However, they are creating the American Nightmare for Americans. You would be
insulted if you spoke English and you’re not welcome in immigrant enclaves of
those cities.

“We
could make the United States an “Hispanic Quebec” without much effort. The key
is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the
Atlantic Monthly recently: “The apparent success of our own multi-ethnic and
multi-cultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by
hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically and what it
meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold
us together.”

Detroit
Muslims forced businesses to install “Press 1” for Arabic, “Press 2 for Spanish”
and “Press 3 for English.” We have a president that bows to Muslim leaders and
last week, he apologized to Afghanistan’s President Karzi for burning a few
Korans, but didn’t mention that Afghanistan soldiers executed to the back of
their heads two U.S. Army officers that had nothing to do with the burnings and
wounded four other U.S. military troops. Tell me again why we are sacrificing
thousands of our young kids in that hell hole of Islamic insanity for the past
10 years?

Lamm
added, “I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture.
I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is
important to ensure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America
reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their
similarities.”

“Fourth,
I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would
add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated and antagonistic to our
population. I would have this second underclass have a 50 percent dropout rate
from high school.”

According
to a CNN report, 7,000 high school students drop out of school every day, one
every 26 seconds. The U.S. now features 42 million functionally illiterate
Americans that cannot read, write or perform simple math. Another 50 million
cannot read past the 4th grade level. Democracy
requires four disciplines to flourish while remaining viable. It requires an
educated population that possesses a similar moral and ethical foundation while
speaking the same language. The United States, via massive immigration, is
losing all four aspects. It cannot and will not remain viable much longer with
the disruption of its educational systems. Conflicting languages bring a whole
new can of worms to the crisis.

“My fifth point for destroying America would
be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I
would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of
“Victimology.” I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was the
fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority
failure on the majority population.”

While
a few elites in high places make billions of dollars, they corrupt America’s
rule of law and undermine the Middle Class. If you’ll notice—Third World countries DO NOT sustain a
Middle Class. They suffer a high class and a low class. America moves in
that direction every day of this immigrant invasion. We feature 15 million
unemployed and 46 million Americans subsisting on food stamps in
2012.

“My
sixth plan for America’s downfall would include dual citizenship and promote
divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress
differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly
engaged in hating each other—that is, when they are not killing each other. A
diverse, peaceful or stable society is against most historical precedent. People
undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient
Greeks: “The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed
a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece
took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty.
Yet, all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors…local
patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece
fell. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the ‘pluribus’
instead of the ‘unum’, we can balkanize America as surely as
Kosovo.”

Lamm
continued, “Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits—make it taboo to
talk about anything against the cult of “diversity.” I would find a word similar
to “heretic” in the 16th century—that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking.
Words like “racist” or “xenophobe” halt discussion and debate.”

At
every juncture today, anti-American groups like the ACLU, La Raza, MALDEF,
LULAC, and MECHA, which are pro illegal alien Mexican groups on U.S. soil—scream
“racism” if anyone protests illegal migration. You have to wonder what will
happen when they gain majority populations? (Hispanics will gain majority
population by 2040.) Will they allow us to use the word “racism” as they promote
their agenda of “Reconquista of Aztlan” while they break our country into
pieces? At over 10 million illegal migrant Mexicans now transplanted onto U.S.
soil, they are well on their way.

“Having
made America a bilingual--bicultural country, having established
multiculturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of
“Victimology,” Lamm said. “I would next make it impossible to enforce our
immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: “That because immigration has been
good for America, it must ALWAYS be good. I would make every individual
immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of
them."

President
Barack Obama ceased enforcing America’s immigration laws as of December of 2011.
He has filed suit against South Carolina, Alabama and Arizona for attempting to
enforce their own laws against their migrant invasions.

In
the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. A profound silence
swept over the room. Finally, he said,
“Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hansen’s book Mexifornia. His book is
dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves
to be destroyed, don’t read that book.”

While
it blows hundreds of millions of dollars on wasteful “stimulus” projects and
the expansion of costly entitlement benefits, the Obama Administration is eliminating
a crucial FBI division that counters gang violence.

This
could not have come at a worse time considering gang violence in the United
States is at an all-time high. In fact, the latest annual gang
threat assessment issued
by the agency—National Gang Intelligence Center (NGIC)—on the chopping block is
downright alarming. It says that gangs are responsible for nearly half of all
violent crimes in most parts of the country and up to 90% in many
jurisdictions. That’s because there are over 33,000 active gangs in the U.S.
with some 1.4 million members, according to the NGIC.

To
help curb the growth of gangs and related criminal activity, Congress directed
the FBI to establish the NGIC in 2005. It’s a multi-agency operation that
combines the efforts of several federal and local agencies working together to
tackle a crisis. According to its website, the NGIC integrates gang
intelligence from across federal, state and local law enforcement on the
growth, migration, criminal activity and association of gangs that pose a
significant threat to the nation.

Why,
then, would FBI Chief Robert Mueller eliminate the NGIC? A conservative news
website uncovered
Muller’s plan because a congressman grilled him about it at a House
Appropriations Committee hearing this week. That’s where government agency
heads go for money each year. It turns out that the FBI’s fiscal year 2013
budget proposal calls for the elimination of the NGIC, which has more than a
dozen positions and an annual budget of nearly $8 million.

That’s a
drop in the bucket compared to the billions that have been wasted under the
president’s fraud-infested $787 billion stimulus, which he vowed would
jumpstart the economy and put Americans back to work. Instead, much of the cash
has gone to unthinkable things like a genitalia-washing program for
uncircumcised African men, international ant research and a Pennsylvania
“tunnel to nowhere.” Click here to read Judicial Watch’s
stimulus fraud reporting.

Bless
the FBI for trying to save taxpayers money. In its 2013
budget proposal
the bureau assures that nixing the NGIC won’t hinder its ability to counter the
threat posed to the U.S. by criminal gangs. The congressman challenging the
NGIC’s closure, Frank Wolf of Virginia, struck back with a rather interesting
statement indicating that the White House was behind the plan.

“We
received a revised version of your testimony late yesterday that the OMB [the
White House’s Office of Management and Budget] inserted language making the
absurd claim that the elimination of the National Gang Intelligence Center –
$7.8 million and 15 positions – will not hinder the FBI’s ability to perform
the analytical work done there,” Wolf said to the FBI chief.

Could this
be part of a bigger Obama plan to pander to Latinos in an effort to earn that
crucial Hispanic vote in the upcoming election? After all, it’s been well
documented that most violent gangbangers in the U.S. are, either Hispanic or
illegal immigrants.

President
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget came out this month and again includes the same
spending, borrowing and taxing policies that have come to define his
presidency. No surprise, this spending blueprint cuts several worthwhile
immigration-enforcement and border-security programs.

The
president's budget continues his administration's policies of ignoring laws
requiring the removal of illegal immigrants. Last year, the Obama
administration issued new deportation guidelines that amount to backdoor
amnesty. The spending priorities contained in his budget are no different. At least
the president is consistent.

Under
his budget for 2013, Mr. Obama reduces the number of detention bed spaces by
1,200 beds - from 34,000 to 32,800. The administration proposes using the
resulting funds to enhance its alternatives-to-detention programs. But these
programs result in higher levels of illegal immigrants disappearing into
American communities.

In
fact, Department of Justice records reveal that since 1996, 40 percent of all
non-detained illegal immigrants in removal proceedings simply became fugitives.
Unfortunately, the president's budget builds on this record of failure.
Detention is the only proven method of preventing illegal immigrants from
avoiding deportation.

The
president's spending proposal also reduces funding for the 287(g) program by 25
percent. The 287(g) program allows state and local governments to partner with
the federal government to assist in the enforcement of immigration laws. This
successful program has identified tens of thousands of illegal immigrants in
prisons and jails nationwide.

The
Obama administration also has announced that it will no longer consider
additional requests for 287(g) partnerships. It makes no sense to get rid of
such a valuable program.

Mr.
Obama's fiscal 2013 budget request also undermines border security and national
security. Last year, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found
that just 44 percent of the Southwestern border was under the operational
control of the Border Patrol. Most of the border remains porous to human
smugglers, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants.

Rather
than take steps to gain control of the U.S.-Mexico border, the president's
budget contains a plan to develop a "border security index" to
measure enforcement progress along the Southwestern border. The administration
thinks this new test will help manipulate the facts to produce a passing grade
for the administration and back its claims that the border is secure.

But
this index is just a cover-up for the administration's failure to fully enforce
immigration laws. There is no substitute for improved border security coupled
with increased interior enforcement of drug and immigration laws.

The
president's budget also contains no funding for the implementation of the Real
ID Act. But this comes as no surprise because the administration already has
delayed this law from taking effect until January 2013. Real ID prohibits
illegal immigrants, including foreign terrorists, from obtaining valid forms of
identification that can be used to board planes and enter federal buildings.
Real ID already has been law for six years and should be fully implemented.
This is another example of the administration not enforcing current laws.

The
president's spending blueprint contains no funding for expansion of the Visa
Security Program (VSP). This program increases the security of the visa process
at U.S. embassies and consulates in "highest-risk" countries. At
visa-issuing posts where VSP exists, all applicants receive additional
screening. Unfortunately, such screening exists only at 19 locations out of a
list of about 50 designated "highest-risk" posts worldwide. Not
expanding the VSP makes it easier for terrorists to get visas to the United
States.

We must secure our borders to prevent national security threats from
becoming reality. It's past time to construct a budget that reduces illegal
immigration and increases border security. The president's budget takes us in
the wrong direction.

Rep.
Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.*

ARIZONA STOPS
THE LA RAZA INVASION. COME TO MEXIFORNIA TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO A STATE OCCUPIED
BY MEXICO! THAT STATE PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS
AND VIRTUALLY ALL JOBS GOT TO HISPANICS! LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUTS OUT AN ADDITIONAL
$600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS.

“But even optimists urged caution. “The primary
magnet that draws people across our border from Mexico is employment,” said Mr.
Allen of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “I think we all recognize that
the real test for us is going to come when the economy turns around in a very
significant way.”

THEY SAY THAT FOR EVERY LA RAZA
THEY CATCH, THERE ARE EIGHT THAT GET THROUGH TO OUR JOBS, “FREE” ANCHOR BABY
BIRTHING AND WELFARE, ALONG WITH OUT A STRAIGHT PATHWAY TO OUR VOTING BOOTHS TO
VOTE MORE LA RAZA DEMS LIKE BARACK OBAMA INTO OFFICE. NO ADMIN IN HISTORY HAS
BEEN SO LA RAZA INFESTED AS OBAMA’S!

They broadly agreed that the decrease in illegal
crossers —down to about 340,000 migrants apprehended in 2011 from a peak of 1.1
million in 2005 — has lightened the workload for the police, but has also
brought worrisome changes in the type of crimes they confront.

PHOENIX — The
impact of steep declines in the number of migrants illegally crossing the
border with Mexico in recent years has
rippled across Arizona and other border states, with federal and local law
enforcement seeing big drops in crime related to illegal immigration.

In Arizona, federal agents have found far fewer drop houses, where
smugglers stash border crossers. Police chiefs in Arizona cities say their
crime rates are low and are falling, along with the numbers and costs of
illegal immigrants coming through their jails.

*

ACCORDING TO CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN MEXIFORNIA ARE BY MEXICAN
GANGS!

While
it blows hundreds of millions of dollars on wasteful “stimulus” projects and
the expansion of costly entitlement benefits, the Obama Administration is eliminating
a crucial FBI division that counters gang violence.

This
could not have come at a worse time considering gang violence in the United
States is at an all-time high. In fact, the latest annual gang
threat assessment issued
by the agency—National Gang Intelligence Center (NGIC)—on the chopping block is
downright alarming. It says that gangs are responsible for nearly half of all
violent crimes in most parts of the country and up to 90% in many
jurisdictions. That’s because there are over 33,000 active gangs in the U.S.
with some 1.4 million members, according to the NGIC.

To
help curb the growth of gangs and related criminal activity, Congress directed
the FBI to establish the NGIC in 2005. It’s a multi-agency operation that
combines the efforts of several federal and local agencies working together to
tackle a crisis. According to its website, the NGIC integrates gang
intelligence from across federal, state and local law enforcement on the
growth, migration, criminal activity and association of gangs that pose a
significant threat to the nation.

Why,
then, would FBI Chief Robert Mueller eliminate the NGIC? A conservative news
website uncovered
Muller’s plan because a congressman grilled him about it at a House
Appropriations Committee hearing this week. That’s where government agency
heads go for money each year. It turns out that the FBI’s fiscal year 2013
budget proposal calls for the elimination of the NGIC, which has more than a
dozen positions and an annual budget of nearly $8 million.

That’s a
drop in the bucket compared to the billions that have been wasted under the
president’s fraud-infested $787 billion stimulus, which he vowed would
jumpstart the economy and put Americans back to work. Instead, much of the cash
has gone to unthinkable things like a genitalia-washing program for
uncircumcised African men, international ant research and a Pennsylvania
“tunnel to nowhere.” Click here to read Judicial Watch’s
stimulus fraud reporting.

Bless
the FBI for trying to save taxpayers money. In its 2013
budget proposal
the bureau assures that nixing the NGIC won’t hinder its ability to counter the
threat posed to the U.S. by criminal gangs. The congressman challenging the
NGIC’s closure, Frank Wolf of Virginia, struck back with a rather interesting
statement indicating that the White House was behind the plan.

“We
received a revised version of your testimony late yesterday that the OMB [the
White House’s Office of Management and Budget] inserted language making the
absurd claim that the elimination of the National Gang Intelligence Center –
$7.8 million and 15 positions – will not hinder the FBI’s ability to perform
the analytical work done there,” Wolf said to the FBI chief.

Could this
be part of a bigger Obama plan to pander to Latinos in an effort to earn that
crucial Hispanic vote in the upcoming election? After all, it’s been well
documented that most violent gangbangers in the U.S. are, either Hispanic or
illegal immigrants.