That's the general idea Gandalf. Are you attempting to post on an online forum without "discussing"?

Have you ever met a Muslim who does not support genocide?

Sorry FD, but no one initiates a genuine and serious discussion by asking such a deliberately absurd question that has no other purpose than to offend and score cheap points.

By the way, are we sticking to the ridiculous idea that the mass execution of a few hundred enemy soldiers during a time of war constitutes "genocide"?

You know, few hundred executed soldiers, a few million men women and children put to death - no difference really is there?

It was not the initiation Gandalf. It was my third post in the thread. It's not my fault you were attempting to post without actually discussing anything.

How did Muhammad (tgp) identify which ones were soldiers? By inspecting their genitals?

Also, are you suggesting the Muhammad's genocide does not count as genocide because he did not achieve the mass death tolls we are capable of in modern times with industrial methods? I'll have to add that to my list. I already have the genital inspection one, BTW.

That's the general idea Gandalf. Are you attempting to post on an online forum without "discussing"?

Have you ever met a Muslim who does not support genocide?

Sorry FD, but no one initiates a genuine and serious discussion by asking such a deliberately absurd question that has no other purpose than to offend and score cheap points.

By the way, are we sticking to the ridiculous idea that the mass execution of a few hundred enemy soldiers during a time of war constitutes "genocide"?

You know, few hundred executed soldiers, a few million men women and children put to death - no difference really is there?

It was not the initiation Gandalf. It was my third post in the thread. It's not my fault you were attempting to post without actually discussing anything.

How did Muhammad (tgp) identify which ones were soldiers? By inspecting their genitals?

Also, are you suggesting the Muhammad's genocide does not count as genocide because he did not achieve the mass death tolls we are capable of in modern times with industrial methods? I'll have to add that to my list. I already have the genital inspection one, BTW.

What is tgp FD?

I'm suggesting its not a genocide because it was an alleged standard run-of-the-mill mass execution of prisoners. It happens literally all the time in just about every war.

It obviously trivialises the intended meaning of genocide which is wholesale indiscriminate killing of an entire ethnic/cultural group - men, women and children.

Slaughtering 6 million jews in a deliberate effort to eliminate the entire jewish population counts as genocide. Putting to death a few hundred soldiers for collusion with the enemy - is not.

But yes yes, I know, Muhammad definitely would have killed 6 million jews - 6 billion even - if only he had the means. We all know Muhammad was literally worse than Hitler or any other human that has ever lived.

Why do muslims kill people in the streets with whatever they can lay their hands on, trucks, guns, bombs, cars, knives, etc?

How many people would a muslim kill if there were no police around at the time? just one, maybe two, maybe twenty - how many would they slaughter?

Firstly a distinction should be drawn between Muslims and Muslim Extremists they are actually different. It seems the media, politicians and society in general like to blanket a perception across an entire religion.

Secondly....you should rephrase to a Muslim extremist. The vast vast majority of Muslims conduct themselves in a law abiding and respectful manner. Thus the answer to that question is they wouldn't.....

Every muslim terrorist is totally convinced he / she is obeying the qur'an and will go to paradise.

The problem is the qur'an as it now stands.

There is not a single muslim on this earth who does not believe that the qur'an is perfect and infallible.

If you support the cause and motivation, you by definition support the terrorism engendered.

The answer is right in front of everybody, the qur'an has to be reviewed and the evil it contains has to be purged.

islamic terrorism is religious terrorism, it is ideological terrorism, you fight ideology with ideology, in this case the qur'an has to questioned, the ideology in it which causes islamic terrorism (human rights atrocities) has to be removed.

However the leftards and muslims fight this tooth and nail, as they know truth will destroy islam, so they bend over backwards to try and stop a reformation of islam, preferring instead the status quo of bloodshed death and destruction as we fight islamic terrorism.