I'm not going to answer your 15 questions for atheist and evolutionist because frankly, many of my fellow atheist have and or will answer them completely and logically. I just wanted to answer your one question that supposedly seems to stop us in our tracks, which i must tell you many people have answered this as well but then again you dont like atheist at all and will rarly debate them, also you will spread rumors about them to (now arent you suppose to love your neighbor as stated in your holy book?) "What proof and evidence can you provide that PROVES that atheism is accurate and correct?" Now thats is just like saying "show me that not collecting stamps is accurate and correct." or " Show me that not believing in leprechauns is accurate and correct." Nobody would think these are questions worth dealing with whatsoever, yet atheism is held to a different standard despite it being fundamentally no different than not believing in leprechauns. Even if it were a belief, it would be a nonsense question to ask, “Can you give me proof and evidence that theism is accurate and correct?” How is belief in God accurate and correct. I would be just as much of a moron by asking that question.It’s not the belief that can be called accurate or correct, because if you believe in God, obviously it is accurate and correct to call yourself a theist, but saying that belief in God is accurate or correct is a nonsense statement, since the only possible question you could be addressing with it is whether or not you believe, not whether or not what you believe is true.Now besides all of that above, The burden of proof realize on the one making the claim that a god or gods exist. How is this possible? lets say that someone were to randomly walk up to you and tell you that "I can fly" you will say the following things most likely "no you cant, prove to me that you can fly" (atheism) while the random person (theist) then says "Hahahaha the burden of proof is on you! prove to me that i cant fly!" thats basically what you are doing. Atheism can not be proven accurate and correct, it can be justified and unjustified, but not accurate and correct.

So in short Atheism is not a belief; therefore, it does not require evidence. On the other hand, if you make the claim that God is real, you must give evidence to support that claim. This is called burden of proof. Since there is no evidence supporting God, it follows logically that he does not exist.So, now that we have this all settled down, please stop asking people the same question that again is inaccurate and instead "prove to me that atheism can be justified" or just not ask it again because its your burden of proof and not ours.

Article created by:

Request an article for submission that you would like to see on here. If excellent enough, the author will have it published onto here in its own page, and continued work from the same author will result in having his/her own page on here with some info about the person and their articles.

Like this article? If you have an idea for an article to be submitted: