Reverend Alan wrote: <quoted text>"We" see??? You mean your fellow pew warmers? I see clever and funny insults which I feel you deserve because you refuse to be honest and truthful. I love it when you are taken down a peg or two or when you get your hide nailed to the wall.Why can't you see there is something really really wrong about making an assertion like it was truth beyond question? Something, like,'you are going to hell if you do not accept Jesus.' Do you have any idea how irritating that is to deal with?You have no proof of any kind, never have never will, and yet you proceed to telling people how they have to live their lives.No one wants to hear your unfounded assertions.

<quoted text>Look, sir.You can call all of the real females here guys.You're the only one here who thinks you're a female.That's fine. You can pretend if it's therapeutic for you. I'm all for that.Keep doing the hormone therapy and save your money. One day, you may actually be a female.Until then, I'm not going to pretend you are.

Nice post. Nano's crazy, unkind and hates difference (look how she treats Kitten Koddler). She really wishes she was the only female on here - and the only reason to do that would be b/c she's trying to find a bf here. How nuts is that?

She's kind of a poster child for "thank whatever deity that we're not like her."

<quoted text>They would use you as a sacrificial virgin.They would pack your leg with C4 and put you on United. One way ticket, economy class. They're cheap. Don't bother trying to answer the phone.Render yourself unsuitable. You might even get to like it.

You are tacit proof that Christianity turns people into vile, cretinous boors.

<quoted text>Don't let your assumed win go to your head. You can always lose in the end.Hey, Catcher, ever wonder if men don't worship law dictated by a supernatural being, would they worship laws men dictate to them? Should there be any expectation they should?Crunch the numbers before you impose laws on what people should think, Bubba. Also, keep in mind that little old ladies and drooling activists don't quite have the same voting power at the end of the day as guys with muscles on their arms. Darwinian Law.

There are no laws dictated by the supernatural. You've Euphythro'd yourself into a corner. The arbitrary dictates of that capricious twit contained in the Booble are the height of insanity.

1. What made your invisible friend moral?

2. Are these alleged supernatural commands objective, subjective, or arbitrary?

Either your invisible friend must rely on some other standards greater than itself which makes it not much of a god or it commands by whim, and could command what mere humans could find morally abhorrent. Well, would you look at that. We've already dismissed so much of your invisible buddy's capriciousness, from genocide, Substitutional Atonement, torture, slavery, infanticide, rape, et al. All absolvo'ed by superior secular morality not decided by the whims of a bearded tyrant of your disgusting imagination.

If you are quite sure there is a difference between right and wrong, then you are then in this situation: is that difference due to Yeahnoway's fiat or is it not? If it is due to Yeahnoway's fiat, then for Yeahnoway itself there is no difference between right and wrong, and it is no longer a significant statement to say that Yeahnoway is good.

As usual, your argument from ignorance is astoundingly ignorant.

(Here is where you counter with some lame joke laden with perversion to further display how Christianity has made you into a vile, disgusting, immoral Pan troglodyte.)

<quoted text>Don't let your assumed win go to your head. You can always lose in the end.Hey, Catcher, ever wonder if men don't worship law dictated by a supernatural being, would they worship laws men dictate to them? Should there be any expectation they should?Crunch the numbers before you impose laws on what people should think, Bubba. Also, keep in mind that little old ladies and drooling activists don't quite have the same voting power at the end of the day as guys with muscles on their arms. Darwinian Law.

Darwinian Law? Survival of the Fittest is not even a Darwinian concept. That was Herbert Spencer. Spencer was forwarding his economic theories and trying to tie them into Natural Selection but the understanding of the evolutionary process has evolved well past that some 150 years later.

U paranoid , not somalian pirate! You our right wing US fundie christians /US war mongers/war investors are... you are Anti-American/Immigrant, anti-world, Anti-Peace, Anti-civil liberties, anti-human rights... You evil you trying ruin US and World with your obnoxious US militaristic neo-imperialist war machines.

<quoted text>Madam, this is a public international forum.Double Fine is a member of the South African Delegation.As such, he has an equal right to post his views.Please desist from any further attempts to shut him down.Oh, and I have heard that Double Fine is awesome.You might enjoy his charms.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.