PRESIDENT OBAMA, who made a surprise trip to Afghanistan Tuesday, deserves credit for giving last year’s order that took out Osama bin Laden.

But to politicize the death of this fiend, which Mr. Obama did in a political attack ad earlier this week, is sad and pathetic.

Worse for voters, it’s probably the first of many mud balls that will be thrown between now and November’s presidential election. Voters should stock up on extra soap and towels.

The killing of the al-Qaeda leader in his compound in Pakistan a year ago was a victory for all Americans. It was a team effort and the product of the work of two administrations — Mr. Obama’s and George W. Bush’s. Mr. Bush started the job and Mr. Obama finished the drill. Thanks to the nation’s Special Forces, its intelligence sources and a brave Navy Seal team, one less madman walks the earth.

But Team Obama didn’t let the facts get in the way of a political commercial. It questioned whether Mitt Romney had the spine to pull the trigger.

This is a 180-degree pivot from Mr. Obama’s position 12 months ago. At that time, the president correctly said he wouldn’t use the bin Laden killing for gloating purposes. As he put it, he wouldn’t “spike the football.”

Unfortunately, the president just planted it. His image makers also worked in a little victory dance, suggesting Mr. Obama “took the harder and more honorable path” — as if there were any other realistic options.

Americans are divided by politics. Yet all cheered the death of bin Laden. It was a unifying event in the ongoing fight against terrorism.

But that was then and now is now. Mr. Obama is weak on the economy. So it’s not a shock that he wants to divert attention from pocketbook issues like jobs and unemployment.

The sad part is that there are other ways for the president to tout his leadership. For example, flying to Afghanistan to sign an agreement that spells out America’s future role in that country was a gutsy move.

But to brag on himself on the first anniversary of the death of America’s Most Wanted Terrorist doesn’t suggest a man who’s confidently in charge. It’s evidence of a politician who’ll say anything to win an election. Washington has too many of those as it is.

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for
following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and
comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are
automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some
comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules,
click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.

Is also blatantly lying to the nation you're supposed to serve to start a war with another nation that had nothing to do with 9/11 and posed absolutely no threat whatsoever to our own. And honestly, who really cares if he bragged about being the president when bin laden was taken out? W. said repeatedly that he removed a brutal dictator blah blah blah. Seriously, there are factors to consider when choosing a president than this.

President Obama has accomplished more than his predecessor, Mr. Bush, with far less fanfare and posturing, in the pursuit of terrorists around the world. So, his campaign touted an accomplishment that took place on his watch. It is not as if others are going to make his case for him or that others would refrain from touting their accomplishments either, so I don't really get the Editors' point here.

Getting bin Laden was a big deal, and the decimation of the al Qaeda leadership is a big deal and both have been accomplished by Obama's focus upon hitting al Qaeda where they live, in Pakistan and in Yemen. Good job, I'd say.

They should have bombed the entire middle east back to the stone ages sometime in the morning of Sept. 12 , if not in the afternoon of Sept 11, 2001. From sea to boiling sea. Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, the whole bunch of 'em.

There is no convincing someone like yourself, Mr. Editor, that a person of the opposing party was a decent president or not. You just make yourself and your cronies look irritable and jealous. It is unseemly for you to behave in this fashion, especially as the editor or our local paper. Makes you somewhat less believable and honest.

This is one of the funniest and distorted editorials - especially the fact the Bush started the job.

Romney is on record as saying "it's not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person."

Listen - it's obviously every man for himself and I don't blame Obama for going on the offensive. It won't be long before they try to pull a John Kerry on him and try to tell the world he's not a Patriot. Oh, that's right - they've already done that.