What exactly are the semantics of #:at inside a #:literal-sets ([x #:at y]) ?
>From the docs " If the #:at keyword is given, the lexical context of the lctx term is used to determine which identifiers in the patterns are treated as literals;". In what way is 'lctx' used?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20120517/eb828407/attachment.html>