Friday, May 31, 2013

There
is much speculation whether or not Hillary Rodham Clinton, will run
for president in 2016.

The
former co-president with her lying, cheating husband, Bill Clinton,
received enormous support in 2008, but those who really call the shots
decided a bi-racial, constitutionally ineligible candidate, Barry
Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, would be the better choice to continue
the planned destruction of America. Hillary Rodham Clinton carries
a lot of old, dirty baggage. Perhaps wait eight more years to install
Comrade Clinton.

Much
of Hillary Rodham's support comes from ignorant women who have no
facts other than the carefully polished image built to portray Comrade
Clinton as a friend of women. By championing murdering unborn babies
using clever propaganda like "protecting women's reproductive
rights", Comrade Clinton is lauded by women who kill their unborn
babies as some sort hero. By championing the filth of sodomy and promoting
AIDS/HIV by supporting sexual deviants, Comrade Clinton assured herself
a nice fat bankroll for her run for the senate and president. Bushels
of money from sexual deviants in Hollywood.

Republican Insider: WH & Congress Meet Regarding “Holder’s Departure”

Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:54

After multiple requests, a brief update finally arrived from a
Republican operative giving insights into the goings on inside the
corridors of power of the United States Congress – namely the immediate future of one Eric Holder…

(Eric Holder spent years shredding the Constitution and being
“Obama’s firewall”. Those days may very well be coming to an end…)

“I apologize again for not getting back to you sooner. I know I keep
telling you that. All of us are being very careful regarding off the record
disclosures. The situation keeps shifting right under us. Will let
you know of a morning meeting this week involving members of the White
House Legislative Affairs Office and members of the Senate Majority
Office, the Senate Minority Office, the House Speaker’s Office, and the
House Minority Office. Meeting lasted nearly an hour. I have
confirmed four things from this meeting that I can share with you.
One, the primary subject of this meeting was the future status of
Attorney General Eric Holder. A secondary topic was Obamacare related.
???

Two, direct discussions regarding Eric Holder’s departure and possible replacement. Both sides wanted plenty of notice and prep time if and when that transition was to take place.
Three, negotiations for Eric Holder to stay on was presented by White
House reps. This negotiation was apparently shut down by both the
Senate Office reps. I find that very interesting and if I were Eric
Holder, very troubling for his future employment status with the DOJ.
He’s losing the support of his own party.continue article at The Ulsterman Report::http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/05/29/republican-insider-white-house-and-congress-meet-regarding-holders-departure/

What was Pres. Lucifer doing while Americans were being killed in Benghazi?

Where was Obama, the Commander In Chief (CIC), when a United
States consulate was being attacked and an ambassador and three other
Americans were being killed?On Fox News Sunday, May 19, 2013, that’s the question asked of White House aide Dan Pfeiffer.Where was Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of Sept. 11, 2012,
when our consulate in Benghazi was besieged and Ambassador Christopher
Stevens, State Department official Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Glen
Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed? The terrorist attack lasted all
night long at multiple locations in Benghazi. We now know that an
unmanned U.S. surveillance drone was in the skies over Benghazi that
night, and that the White House knew (and saw) what was happening, as it
happened.But while insisting that Obama had kept “in constant touch that night
with his national security team and kept up to date with the events as
they were happening,” Pfeiffer deemed the CIC’s whereabouts that night,
and specifically whether Obama was in the Situation Room, “a largely
irrelevant fact.”

Obama’s
actions and nonactions on that terrible night are a blank spot in his
presidency. We simply don’t know much about them, and the White House
has always been perfectly content to leave it that way.

We know he was meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey on an
unrelated matter at 5 p.m.
Washington time, when he learned of the attack. In congressional
testimony, Panetta said he had no contact with the president or the
White House after that point.Dempsey said he didn’t hear from the president, either. [...]Next, we know that the president talked to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at 10 p.m.,
when the assault that killed Chris Stevens and State Department
computer expert Sean Smith was over but the mortar attack that killed
two former U.S. Navy SEALs at another facility hadn’t yet taken place.What about the rest of the time? [...]The day after his mystery night, Obama publicly emerged. He gave a statement at 10:35 a.m.condemning the Benghazi attack — and left Washington at 2:20 p.m. for a fundraiser in Las Vegas.”

Kevin DuJan,
a self-described “conservative homosexual” who lives in Chicago and
blogs on HillBuzz, believes Obama was high on cocaine during those
“missing hours” of the Benghazi attack.
In his post of May 24, 2013, DuJan writes:If you’ve ever known anyone
who is a drug addict, you’d see it’s obvious that Barack Obama was high
on cocaine the night of Benghazi; it is the only logical explanation for
his disappearance and the White House’s refusal to comment on what he
was doing at the time. Since this was a night of great
crisis for our country, the only logical reason that the White House
won’t explain where the president was is if this man was high as a kite
on illegal narcotics at the time. [...]According to Lowry’s timeline:* Obama appeared sober on 9/11/12 at 5pm EST when he met with
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Gen. Martin Dempsey. [...] Obama appears to have been still functional
and ambulatory at 5pm that day.* Lowry says that Obama learned of the death of US Ambassador Chris Stevens at this meeting…before Obama disappeared for many hours.These are the mystery “missing hours” that the White House refuses to talk about.* Obama next emerged from cloister at 10pm EST 9/11/12 when he
spoke with Hillary Clinton; it’s not stated if this was in person or if
it was on the phone, but it sure feels like Obama was out of his mind on
drugs when this happened. Clinton would never bust him on this
(because she can never say a bad word about this man if she wants to
secure the black vote in 2016), but even people on a
late-80s-Wall-Street-grade binge of cocaine can talk on the phone for a
few minutes. [...]* Obama then went missing until the next morning. [...]* Lowry then says Obama was next spotted at 1035am EST on 9/12/12
when he pretended the Benghazi attack was about some YouTube video…and
then he disappeared again until he boarded his plane for fabulous Las
Vegas at 220pm EST later that day.After reading Lowry’s article, my good friend Justine in
California emailed me to ask whether I thought Obama was having sex with
Reggie Love during the “missing hours” and if that’s where he was.
[...] I think Obama doing cocaine is a much better explanation for his
missing hours, simply because at his age and with all the men he’s been
with it’s not like he couldn’t just stop romancing Reggie for a little
bit…and then get back to it when they were in Vegas. I know the
stereotype of gay guys is that we’re all sex-crazed and can’t control
ourselves, but even the biggest gay sexual glutton in the world can pull
himself away from a hot guy long enough to take care of something
important (if need be). It’s not like this would have been the first
time that Barack Obama was having gay sex…so surely he could have pushed
“pause” to be president for a while (before getting back to whatever he
was up to when the crisis was over).However, once you take drugs you are pretty much on another
astral plane for however long it takes for the drugs to leave your
system. I’ve sadly watched a lot of incredible people in the nightlife
scene ruin their lives with cocaine over the years, and once these
people got high they stayed high until the drugs metabolized enough for
them to function. [...]The timeline Lowry fleshed out perfectly fits a scenario where
Barack Obama retired to his private quarters (perhaps with Reggie
Love…or maybe one of the other low-ranking young men who are forever
suspiciously palling around with this president, unlike any president
before him) sometime around 6pm EST or so on 9/11/12. He then seems to
have taken drugs (which I believe most likely involved cocaine). Hillary
Clinton either showed up to kill his buzz or she kept calling on the
phone over and over again until he answered at 10pm. [...] From then until the staff was finally able to rouse, dress, and
make him presentable enough for the public at 1030am the next day.
Barack Obama appears to have been out of his mind high on drugs.Since the White House deliberately is insisting that it’s
“irrelevant” where Obama was during those missing hours that Lowry has
asked about, we must assume I’m correct and the President of the United
States was incapacitated from heavy narcotics use.I would gladly retract this story if the White House
would sufficiently explain Barack Obama’s whereabouts during those
missing hours and prove he was not out of his mind on cocaine at the
time (or gluttonously engaged in gay sex, as my friend Justine
believes). You should know by now that whenever the Obama Regime stonewalls and absolutely refuses to reveal information mysteriously, there is a reason for it.With this particular president, that reason more often than not
involves drugs or gay sex (or a combination of both)…and just like with
John F. Kennedy’s own drug use and sexual escapades, there are many
people who will refuse to believe this about Obama for decades. But, at
some point in the future I hope you live long enough to see people
openly talking about Obama’s drug use and homosexuality, as it’s as
clear as day for those of us who are gay and have known people with drug
problems as rampant as this president’s. It’s not like the man
disappeared off the face of the Earth into another dimension during
those “missing hours”. But, I suppose it’s uncomfortable for a lot of
people to imagine what he was really doing during that mystery time.
So what do you think the POS was doing in those mystery missing hours?
See also “Obama’s gay sex-cocaine romps with Larry Sinclair,” May 31, 2010.~Eowyn

10) Only in America...could politicians talk
about the greed of the rich at a Liberal, $35,000.00 a plate campaign
fund-raising event.

9) Only in America...could people claim
that the government still discriminates against black Americans when
they have a black President, ablack Attorney General, and roughly
18% of the federal workforce is black while only 12% of the population
is black.

8) Only in America...could they have had the two
people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head
of the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways
and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor
of higher taxes.

7) Only in America...can they have terrorists
kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by
fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.

6) Only
in America...would they make people who want to legally become
American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens
of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting
anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become
American citizens.

5) Only in America...could the people who
believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's
Constitution be thought of as "extremists."

4) Only in
America...could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check
or buy alcohol, but not to vote.

3) Only in America...could
people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are
gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on
equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less
than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).

2) Only in
America...could the government collect more tax dollars from the
people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion
dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million
PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.

1) Only in America...could the rich people - who pay 86% of
all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair share" by
people who don't pay anyincome taxes at
all.

On August 6, 2011,
a military helicopter— Extortion 17— carrying thirty-eight men
(including twenty-five of the elite SEAL Team 6, five National Guard and
Army Reserve, and eight Afghan commandos) was shot down over
Taliban-controlled territory in eastern Afghanistan. They had been on a
top secret mission to take out a high-value target.

It was the worst loss of life in a single day since the war in Afghanistan began.
Per a 1250-page military report, it was simply the result of a “lucky
shot” by Taliban soldiers perched on top of a building. Per families of
those killed and military experts at a press conference held on May 9, 2013, this is a lie among a host of other lies.

After
the families attended a several hour military briefing about this
“lucky shot,” describing what happened and why their sons died, they
smelled a rat and started digging around.

Billy and Karen Vaughn, parents of Navy SEAL Aaron C. Vaughn, started poking around at the “official” story and found not a rat, but a stinking swamp, a cover-up that went all the way to the top.

When
the Vaughns began trying to drain the swamp, they received what the
Obama administration is famous for: the shakedown. None other than one
of the highest ranking officers in the nation—Admiral
William McRaven, commander at U.S. Special Operations Command—paid the
Vaughns a little visit, in essence telling them to keep their mouths
shut.

What exactly happened on August 6, 2011? What went wrong—or in this case went right that has the Obama administration dispatching high-ranking officers as thugs?

There are two possibilities, according to information revealed at the press conference:

1. The Obama administration sent American soldiers on a suicide mission, or

2. Someone set up our American heroes—that is, had them murdered—that may include the Afghan government—or shockingly may include Barack Hussein Obama himself.

We learned seven major facts at the press conference:

1. Thirty SEAL Team 6, National Guard, and Army Reserve were packed into a decrepit 1960s era CH-47 helicopter(something, according to military experts, that was unheard of.)

Per military experts, special operations were always conducted with the state-of-the-art MH-47 helicopter—the helicopter SEAL Team 6 exclusivelytrained in.

Further, never—ever—were that many special operations personnel packed into a single helicopter. They were always split up into small groups with multiple MH-47s.

2.
Although the military could have easily taken out the Taliban positions
with a drone strike prior to the operation, as the families were later
told, this was not done because there were possible “friendlies” among
the Taliban; the United States wanted to “win the minds and hearts of the enemy.”

Billy Vaughn, father of Navy SEAL Aaron Vaughn, speaking at the press conference with rage in his voice, blasted this ludicrousness:

Aaron
did not become a Navy SEAL Team 6 Gold Squad to win the hearts and
minds of the Islamic jihadists. He became a Navy SEAL to fight for this
republic and defeat the enemy!

3.
Although the military had intel that the Taliban were planning on
firing on a helicopter, although an intense battle had been raging for
several hours, and although normal protocol mandated that the CH-47 required at least one gunship escort, all normal rules of war were suspended.

But now for the real cover-up by the Obama administration:

4.
There were eight nameless Afghan commandos onboard the CH-47. Eight
Afghan commandos were loaded onto the CH-47 along with their American
counterparts; but at the last minute, they were replaced without
changing the manifest. It was as if someone knew they were going on a suicide mission and pulled them out. The official in charge of the investigation (General Jeffrey Colt), in his 1250-page report, did not address this fact and did not even mention it. In fact, it is likely these original Afghan commandos contacted the Taliban, telling themthe CH-47 was on its way. It appears the Taliban knew the exact time and route the CH-47 would be using; that
the only way the “lucky shot” would have been possible with the
helicopter thousands of feet in the air in cover of darkness would have
been if the Taliban had been tipped off.

5.
Everyone on Extortion 17 was immediately cremated without permission
from the families, supposedly because the bodies were so badly burned in
the crash. According to Charles Strange, father of Navy SEAL Michael
Strange, this need to immediately cremate everyone aboard is a complete lie. Taliban on the ground in fact found the bodies of the crew. The Obama administration cremated everyone in order to cover up something.

6.
The CH-47 black box was “lost” according to the military
investigation—“washed away by an Afghan flood.” As most know, aircraft
black boxes don’t get “lost”; they are virtually indestructible and
carry a tracking device that makes them easy to locate. It was “lost” in order to cover up something the Obama administration wants to keep hidden.

7.
Probably one of the most shocking revelations in the SEAL Team 6
cover-up, something that was first brought out during the press
conference that shows Obama is no Christian but is in fact a closet
Muslim, is that Barack Hussein Obama disallowed the name of Jesus
to be spoken during the initial military memorial service in Kabul and
permitted a radical Islamic Imám to curse our dead heroes.

Let
every American demand that whatever Barack Obama is hiding, whatever
the military brass is hiding, that it be revealed. America must demand
that a Congressional investigation drain the swamp of the Obama
administration in order to reveal exactly what sickening secret Barack
Hussein Obama is covering up. Not next month. Not next week. Not
tomorrow. But today.

Thursday, May 30, 2013

MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT! Obama Fraud Case - BREAKING EXCLUSIVE!

PPSIMMONS News Exclusive Report - May 30, 201312:30 pm ET

As Promised: Things are beginning to move forward in the Obama Fraud Case!

Carl Gallups and Mike Zullo recently went to CPAC 2013 and Capitol
Hill to begin to move the case forward to federal investigation levels. "Following is just the beginning. There may be much more to come - very soon." Carl Gallups said.

Carl Gallups - "By the time this matter is over there will
be media sources, major media personalities and certain government
officials who will appear to be awfully inept. It is a shame they did
not deal with this previously and properly when they had the opportunity
to do so. As things continue to move forward, perhaps they will jump on
board and do their constitutional due diligence."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Mike Zullo - featured speaker at the Constitutional Sheriff's Convention
*Mike Zullo - to give FULL criminal disclosure to law enforcement and Congressmen
*Rep. Steve Stockman - to be in attendance and the Keynote speaker
*CCP Det. Don Jeffrey - to make a FREEDOM FRIDAY appearance - Obama SSN# fraud*Mike Zullo - to make a FREEDOM FRIDAY appearance live from the Sheriff's conference*Sheriff's Conference - already enrolling record numbers to attend!

SEVERAL MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENTS!

Zullo - Featured Speaker - Sheriff's Convention

Mike
Zullo, lead investigator, for the Sheriff Arpaio Cold Case Posse Obama
Fraud case has revealed to PPSIMMONS News that he will be a featured
speaker at the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association Convention St. Charles, Missouri
- this coming weekend, May 31-June 1. Hundreds of Constitutional law
enforcement officers from around the country will be in attendance as
well as U.S. Congressmen.

This event is open to the public but will also contain breakout sessions designed only for sworn constitutional law enforcement officials. Mike Zullo will be a featured speaker at the public session where he says he will do a full public presentation of the CCP Obama Fraud case.

Zullo said, "This presentation will contain no new information
concerning the case. However, the presentation will be monumentally
important because of the overall main stream media news blackout there
will be many there who will hear this important information and criminal
evidence for the very first time. We are certain that once they hear
the information from this 15-month criminal investigation, they will be
deeply concerned."

Zullo - Featured Speaker at FULL CRIMINAL DISCLOSURE Conference

However,
Mike Zullo informed us that he also will be the featured speaker at
two different 2-hour breakout sessions designed for law enforcement and
congressmen only. Concerning these breakout sessions Mike Zullo said,
"We will have official credential checks at the door. No one will be admitted except duly credentialed law enforcement officials and U.S. Congressmen.
At this session, I will, upon the authority of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, be
presenting the entire criminal case that we have in this matter.
Never-before-seen evidence and information will be presented to these in
attendance. We will be asking these attendees to support our efforts to
move this entire matter forward to a full congressional
investigation."

Lately, this conference of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association
has been touted in various news outlets as a meeting of constitutional
law enforcement officers who are highly concerned with the restoration
of our constitutional republic and liberties they feel have been greatly
eroded in the past several years in particular.

Mike Zullo stressed, "I want to be clear. This conference is
monumentally important to the CCP Obama Fraud Case. However, this
particular conference and the potentially powerful outcomes of its
presentation is not the only line of approach in which we
are currently engaged. We have other people looking at this - very
important people. We have other plans of action, currently in the works,
in moving the case forward to a full federal investigation. All of
these plans, including this conference have been the direct or indirect
result of my trip to CPAC and to Capitol Hill with Carl Gallups earlier
this year."

Zullo went on to explain, "This conference could prove to be hugely
important - but it only came about relatively recently. We were in the
process of moving forward in very constructive ways before we had this
conference opportunity. We are, however, extremely grateful for the
opportunity to make this connection and these presentations. These are
some of the people who have the constitutional authority and connections
to make things happen in this case. We tried to give the mainstream
media the opportunity to do their jobs in two different publicly
announced press releases over the last couple of years. The media
ignored the information of a credible criminal case. Now we will take
investigation information to other sources."

Congressman Steve Stockman to be Keynote speaker and in attendance at Zullo presentations

U.S. Representative, Steve Stockman, from Texas is scheduled to be the Keynote Speaker on Friday evening of the conference. By the time Stockman speaks, he will have heard Zullo's CCP presentation.

Inside
Convention sources have revealed to PPSIMMONS News that this year's
conference is already swelling to record level attendance. Hundreds more
than expected are already signing up to come.

Carl Gallups explained, "I have served as a Deputy Sheriff in two
different Florida Sheriff's Offices. I know that Sheriffs are
Constitutional law enforcement officers with a lot of power and tons of
powerful connections. There are thousands of these law men all over the
United States. Many of them are beginning to go on record as being very
concerned with the turn our nation is taking in several unconstitutional
ways. If any group of people can turn that tide of public opinion and
public influence - it is a group of hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of
United States Sheriffs. Mike and I are thrilled with this most recent
opportunity to share what the CCP has known for almost two years now."

CCP Investigators Mike Zullo and Don Jeffrey to make appearances on FREEDOM FRIDAY

Mike Zullo will make a live call-in presentation to FREEDOM FRIDAY WITH CARL GALLUPS
on tomorrow's (May 31) show at 4:30 pm Central Time. He will give us
the very latest in the conference updates and in various other matters
concerning the ongoing criminal investigation in the Obama Fraud Case.

Prior to Zullo's appearance on FREEDOM FRIDAY - Investigator Don Jeffrey of the CCP will be making a full Obama Social Security Number Fraud presentation - live on Carl's show. His appearance will be from 4-4:30 pm Central Time.

Canadian Judge Confirms: 2011 Election Fraudulent

from ravenise004:
The Canadian Federal Court has confirmed that the country’s 2011
federal election, which led to the victory of Stephen Harper’s
government, was fraudulent.
The court emphasized in a Thursday ruling that it has found in no
uncertain terms that widespread election fraud took place during the
vote.
The ruling also stated that “there was an orchestrated effort to
suppress votes during the 2011 election campaign by a person with access
to the [Conservative Party's] CIMS database.”
Accordingly, the Council of Canadians has called on the Conservative
Party to investigate the issue. It says anything less at this point
would be a cover-up on behalf of the Conservatives.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

A green light for Iran’s new
terrorist war

Regime intends to shift the battleground stateside

By Reza Kahlili

Iranian leaders have given the go-ahead to a coalition of terrorists to
attack American soil, in effect all but declaring war on the United States.As I reported recently and according to a source in the Islamic regime’s
intelligence apparatus, Iran
created the Coalition
of Muslim Soldiers to wreak havoc on the United States and its allies. The
goal is to change the field of battle from the Middle East to the American
homeland, and the opening salvos — if indeed the Boston bombing wasn’t the
first — are due imminently unless U.S. authorities can short-circuit Tehran’s
plans.The source said the regime views the Boston bombing as a successful
terrorist attack in which fear was created, U.S. intelligence
was questioned and a sense of security was diminished. No link has been
established yet to any group or nation for the Boston tragedy, which is the aim
of this coalition of terrorists, formed by units of Lebanon’s Hezbollah, al Qaeda and Iran’s Quds Forces.In a 2010 meeting, Qasem Soleimani,
the head of the Quds
Forces; Seif
Adel, the operational head of al Qaeda; and Mustafa Badr
al-Din, the operational head of Hezbollah, devised
a plan for continued terrorist operations against America under a new
coalition, dubbed the Coalition
of Muslim Soldiers. It includes al-Shabab, an al Qaeda offshoot
based in Somalia,
and has its central command in the Iranian city of Kerman.After the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists in recent years and
again with the increase in sanctions, the Islamic regime’s supreme leader
warned that the country’s strategy had changed to face “threats with threats,”
a subliminal message that the regime will go on the offensive with terrorist
covert operations. More recently, a senior commander of the Islamic regime had
warned that terrorism was coming to America.“If the people of America and Europe do not confront the aggressive policies
of their governments, they cannot then remain far from the possible future
[terrorist attacks],” Brig. Gen. Masoud
Jazayeri, the regime’s armed forces deputy chief of staff, said in a Feb.
23 interview with Fars News Agency.
Gen. Jazayeri,
objecting to U.S. involvement in the Syrian civil war, warned that explosions
similar to those in Syria
would take place in other countries.READ MORE...

Here we are five months into Obama's second term, and Americans are confronted
with a puzzle, searching through a maze of mixed messages, trying to sort out
the truth from what we are being told by this administration. By now we should
have a better grasp of who this president is and his actual agenda so that we
could rally behind him. By now we should be able to trust our own president.

But these recent White House scandals have only affirmed some of our growing
suspicions, that Obama's notion of "transforming" this country is not
what we were led to believe, nor one we would have supported.

And so, when we hear Keith Koffler is
reporting below, which came directly from the White House, we certainly
have a good reason to wonder:

President Obama and the First Lady look forward to traveling to Senegal,
South Africa, and Tanzania from June 26 – July 3. The President will reinforce
the importance that the United States places on our deep and growing ties with
countries in sub-Saharan Africa, including through expanding economic growth,
investment, and trade; strengthening democratic institutions; and investing in
the next generation of African leaders. Mrs. Obama, you may remember, traveled
to South Africa two years ago for a trip that was half work and half vacation.
And almost all taxpayer money.

In the absence of transparency, we are left to apply our deductive skills and
pull together the pieces of this puzzle that are Barack Hussein Obama. One hint
comes from the blogger of "White Hat Reports" who told us that the
real motive for Michelle's trip to Spain in August of 2010 – you know, the
little getaway that cost U.S. taxpayers $467.000
dollars – was to move the billions in "unaccounted for" Stimulus
Bailout Package monies to a safe haven, far from the prying eyes and grasping
hands of the Internal Revenue Service.

In light of impending indictments for the avalanche of scandals now befalling
the entire Obama regime, could the upcoming trip to South Africa be for the
purpose of stashing another nest egg, or perhaps adding to an already existing
stash, or arranging a location for a swift retreat from Washington, D.C.? Or

The Obamas have managed to orchestrate themselves into the White House, to
manipulate the media, to trample upon our Constitution, to deconstruct our
military, and to sabotage our economy. With bold irreverence toward our
American values, they have essentially sought to undo the United States of
America – to the point that we now fear our government and are earnestly
clinging to the last vestiges of law to protect us from these tyrants.

Clearly they were not prepared for the sudden pushback from the very
God-centered nation they have treated with such contempt. But having surrounded
themselves with minions of sycophants and Communist cohorts, the Obamas most
likely believe that somehow, at the very least, they will manage to slither
through the escape hatch with all of our taxpayer's hard-earned American money.

Should they succeed, it might appear that these usurpers would have won. But a
"win" for them would simply mean dodging the rule of American law.
Their loss would be lifelong exile from the greatest, strongest, most generous
and magnificent country in the history of the world!

With piles of cash, to be sure, but be not deceived. Money does not compensate
for the shame they are putting on their daughters who will have to live with
the reality that Americans, as well as citizens across the globe who respect
us, will always recognize the Obamas as enemies of the free world.

Barack Obama will have been demoted from his esteemed position as
self-described Savior of the Suffering, Messiah of the Minorities, and The
Great Hope of the Disenfranchised Masses, and he and his Mary Magdalene and
their two privileged, entitled princesses – in one fell swoop – will be reduced
to a bitter family without a country.

They will have their prepared rationales and answers ready to spin of course,
but over time the remaining mysteries will surface. Truth has a way of coming
out. This puzzle will not remain one forever; and then humanity will fully know
who Obama is, the facts of his origin, what a terrific imposter and
pathological liar he's been. There isn't enough money to protect him, nor is
this earth so vast that there could exist any place remote enough where he can
hide.

In the midst of this fog of inquiries, we cannot anticipate at this point the
impact of criminal charges on the Obamas or how those consequences will effect
this whole administration.

From a larger perspective, I am convinced the profoundly negative impact the
Obamas' behavior has had on the Democratic Party and their platform for big
government hasn't begun to register yet. The experiment of big government has failed
miserably. In fact, this progressive administration has inadvertently awakened
and galvanized America on just about every level, wherever they have intruded
on our freedoms.

This horror-filled chapter of Communist over-reaching has actually done more
for the conservative ideology than a series of outstanding conservative
presidents could have achieved. America has been alerted.

Now we know what we don't want; now we know why we liberties are so precious,
and now we know what compelled our founders to stand so steadfastly against
tyranny.

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin called it “arguably the biggest scandal
the Obama Administration is facing in Washington right now—the
Department of Veterans’ Affairs disability claims backlog.” The average
wait time, she reported, is 273 days. “Despite a half-a-billion dollar
new computer system designed to improve efficiency at the VA, 97 percent
of all the claims are still filed on paper.”

eet
one of Washington DC's most arrogant and, until May 10, 2013, most politically-invisible
people in the Obama Administration—Lois G. Lerner.
Lerner is generally, although mistakenly, viewed by the media
as an apolitical, albeit leftwing, bureaucrat with no political axes
to grind. The branding of Lerner was accomplished by Larry
M. Noble (who retired from government service at the end of Clinton's
reign. From 1979 until the end of 2000, Noble served as counsel
of the Federal Election Commission [FEC]. Noble came into
government near the end of Jimmy Carter's one term and left at
the end of Bill Clinton's second term. Noble, whose own
political pedigree is as opaque as Barack Obama's transparent
administration, rose to General Counsel of the FEC in 1987. He
hired Lois Lerner, whose questionable, partisan political ethics
began there. Because questions arose early about Lerner's obvious
discrimination against conservatives, Noble was forced to defend
his associate general counsel in the pubic arena by assuring the Reaganites
that she was completely apolitical, and that she was devoted only to
increasing regulations while limiting the influence of money in politics—Republican
money, it turned out.

Reports
written by Lerner as the Associate General Counsel at the FEC
(uncovered by National Review) show "...she was
predisposed to back Republicans against the wall while giving Democrats
a pass."National Review noted that while the
reports, at that time, were signed by Noble, sources at the FEC
confirmed that, given her role at the FEC, Lerner would have
shaped the views and conclusions. "As
head of Enforcement at the FEC, Lerner would have approved the
drafting of every General Counsel's Report." Her
thoughts. Her words. Her reports. Camouflaged with Noble's signature.

When
former Gov. Haley Barbour [R-MS] was the chairman of the Republican
National Committee, the RNC created the nonprofit National Policy
Forum just before the 1994 political season when the GOP took control
of Congress. The Democratic National Committee accused Barbour
of funneling Hong Kong money through the National Policy Forum
to the RNC. In 1994, the DNC accused the RNC of taking a contribution
from Young Brothers Company, a US corporation owned by the sons
of Hong Kong tycoon Ambrous Tung Young. What happened was that
the Young brothers loaned the National Policy Foundation
$1.6 million. The NPF used the loan to repay a loan owed to the RNC.
The liberal media, including TIME, reported that YoungBrothers
was essentially a shell company with negligible assets and income. The
FEC decided the loan was a contribution and not a loan; and that US
election law prohibited campaign contributions from overseas sources;
and it also prohibits funneling money through "front groups"
that hide the true source of the money.

The
report, over the signature of the general counsel, concluded that Barbour
and the RNC treasurer, Alec Poiteviant "...knowingly
andwillingly
violated federal
law." The
very prolonged investigation launched by Lerner ultimately stalled
and finally petered out, leading to a partyline 3 to 3 stalemate among
the six FEC commissioners. She was determined to put Barbour
in prison, but she failed. On paper, Noble was the driving force
behind the RNC probe. In the end, Attorney General Janet Reno
found nothing she could hang her hat on—or hang Barbour
and Poiteviant. Try as they did to concur with the FEC, the career
lawyers in the Justice Dept. concluded that the loan was a loan, and
not a political contribution.

This is Lois
Lerner. A very complex, rabid leftwing activist who, since 1986,
has been able to wear one of the largest leftwing pairs of hobnail boots
in the government bureaucracy simply because Noble convinced
the right that Lerner was apolitical—and his signature camouflaged
her edicts. When you're the invisible enemy of the right, stealth is
power.

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Question over missing time deepensBy Doug HagmannFull StoryI first brought it up with specificity in my article titled The Benghazi Deception
on May 16, comparing Obama’s missing “18 1/2 hours” during the time
four Americans were being murdered to the 18 1/2 minute erasure of the
Watergate tapes of the Nixon era. Exactly one week later, I clearly illustrated
that Chris Wallace repeatedly asked David Pfeiffer, a top Obama
official, “where was Obama” during the night when four American’s were
murdered in Benghazi. Mr. Wallace actually did what a good newsman
should do, and repeated the question no fewer than eight-(8) times, but
never received an answer or explanation. Nothing, nada, zilch. Crickets.

As much as these "agents of change" would like to take credit for
their subversive work, such a premature outing can damage their efforts
of dismantling America's foundation. They would rather wait until after
this country is "fundamentally transformed," at which time they can
safely unmask themselves before the bamboozled toiling masses, who
wouldn't know what hit them. New books will be written then, so the
public school students could learn about these glorious heroes of the
revolution and follow their example. In this sense, Trevor Loudon's book
arrives before its time.

Incidentally, the book cover is designed by another notorious time traveler, Oleg Atbashian, who claims to have come from the future to help his American comrades prepare for the socialist utopia that lies ahead.

What emerges could be devastating for both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton

More Benghazi Whistleblowers Ready to Step Forward

“If
Hillary Clinton gave the OK to sell missiles to insurgents... it would
reveal the utter callousness and calculated mendacity of a woman who
knows full well ‘what difference at this point’ such a revelation would
make…

Selling such missiles to anyone is usually a function of the CIA…

former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chose to move forward because she wanted to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap…

It
is worth remembering that in assisting the overthrow of Gaddafi,
Obama violated the War Powers Act of 1973 requiring Congressional
approval of the use military force after 60 days…

It
will be revealed the White house told Ham (AFRICOM Commander General
Carter Ham) to stand down, and when he refused, the White House called
his deputy and had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of his command.”

According to two former diplomats who spoke with PJ Media’s Roger Simon, more
Benghazi whistleblowers will emerge and blow a giant hole in the Obama
administration’s already shaky narrative regarding the deaths of four
Americans.

Their
revelations will focus on two subjects: the real purpose of Ambassador
Christopher Steven’s mission in Libya, and the pressure put on former
AFRICOM commander Gen. Carter Ham to stand down from any attempt to
rescue those under attack. What emerges could be devastating for both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

The
whistleblowers are reportedly colleagues of the former diplomats. They
have yet to come forward because they are in the process of obtaining
lawyers, necessitated by their work in areas that are not completely
covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act.

Furthermore,
Simon notes that, as of now, what the diplomats are saying is
considered hearsay, “but the two diplomats sounded quite credible. One
of them was in a position of responsibility in a dangerous area of Iraq
in 2004,” he writes.

What
the diplomats say the whistleblowers will reveal is that Christopher
Stevens was in Benghazi to buy back Stinger missiles from al Qaeda,
issued to them by the U.S. State Department. Selling such missiles to
anyone is usually a function of the CIA, but they reportedly were
against the idea of selling such advanced technology to elements of the
“rebel movement” attempting to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. Stinger
missiles can endanger civilian aircraft.

According
to the diplomats, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chose to
move forward because she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”

When
the “rebels” who were sold the missiles turned out to be al Qaeda,
Stevens was tasked with the job of cleaning up the fiasco.
One of the diplomats noted that it was likely the same elements of the
terrorist group to whom the missiles were sold ended up attacking the
consulate in Benghazi, killing Stevens, State Department employee Sean
Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen A. Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods.

The unnamed diplomat was even more contemptuous of the Clinton-led effort, likening it to the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War,”
the story of a Congressman who thought it was a good idea to supply
Stinger missiles to the mujahedeen in Afghanistan during their fight to
overthrow the Russians. “It’s as if Hillary and the others just watched
that movie and said ‘Hey, let’s do that!’” the diplomat said.

National Review’s Jim Geraghty, who reviewed several public reports regarding the movement of Stinger missiles in Libya, insists the diplomats’ account can be corroborated and
contradicted. His report highlights several critical elements, noting
that rebel leaders did request the missiles, including Abdul Hakim
Al-Hasadi, who was detained in Pakistan as a hostile combatant by U.S.
forces in 2002 “while returning from Afghanistan where I fought against
foreign invasion,” according to Al-Hasadi himself.

As for the U.S. directly supplying missiles to the rebels, Geraghty cites two different New York Times reports revealing other possibilities. The first report notes
that the rebels were securing such missiles from the Gaddafi regime’s
captured storage bunkers. The second report was far more devastating to
the Obama administration, noting that
it gave its blessing to Qatar to ship arms to the insurgency, before
becoming “alarmed” that the weapons were ending up in the hands of
“Islamic militants.” The Times insisted there was no evidence
that such missiles were linked to the Benghazi attacks. But considering
there’s been no specific identification of the Qatari weapons or the
specific ordnance used to attack the consulate, such claims are dubious
at best. Geraghty further notes that such shipments violate UN Resolution 270 prohibiting the direct or indirect sale or transfer of weapons to any party in Libya.

Thus,
who sold Stinger missiles to the rebels remains in question. However,
the diplomats’ contention regarding Stevens’ real mission in Benghazi
was buttressed by an Oct. 23, 2011 column in The Telegraph. Reporter Con Coughlin revealed that ”teams
of CIA officers, supported by other intelligence services such as
Britain’s MI6, have been scouring Libya in search of the missing
missiles” following the fall of Gaddafi’s regime in August. Reuters further noted that
the consulate “had been a base for, among other things, collecting
information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from Libyan
government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles,” a fact
inadvertently revealed during a House of Representatives Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform hearing about security lapses in
Benghazi. The day after that hearing Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank accused Republicans
of ”boneheaded questioning” of State Department witnesses that left
little doubt that the consulate was a ”CIA base.”

Geraghty sums up his investigative report with the other major, but as yet unsubstantiated, reason the CIA was in Benghazi. ”During
this time, a large number of weapons, including anti-aircraft missiles,
were leaving Libya and arriving in Turkey en route to Syrian rebels–and
the CIA had personnel in both countries assigned to monitor and assist
the arms shipments.”

The diplomats contend the whistleblowers will report that Stevens was attempting to procure the Stingers.
This does not negate the possibility that the effort was being done to
arm Syrian rebels, absent involvement that could be directly traced back
to the Obama administration. It is worth remembering that in assisting
the overthrow of Gaddafi, Obama violated the
War Powers Act of 1973 requiring Congressional approval of the use
military force after 60 days. The president sidestepped it by asserting
that no American troops were put in harm’s way. If the administration is
arming Syrian rebels, it would appear that both Resolution 270 and the War Powers Act are once again irrelevant, as far as the administration is concerned.

As troubling as the first assertion made by the diplomats is, the second one is far more damning. Their contacts insist that AFRICOM had Special Ops “assets in place that could have come to the aid of the Benghazi consulate immediately” (emphasis mine). They
further insist that it will be revealed the White house told Ham to
stand down, and when he refused, the White House “called his deputy and
had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of his command.”

Ham retired as head of AFRICOM in April. Yet the announcement of
his retirement was released by the Defense Department on Oct 31, 2012.
It said that Ham would eventually step down, even as he retained “the
full confidence of the secretary of defense and the chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff,” according to Pentagon Press Secretary George
Little, who further noted Ham’s decision to retire was “entirely
personal.”

It was also unusual. Ham was removed from a position with a three year rotation well short of that mark. On October 25, 2012, former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta insisted that,
with regard to a rescue operation ”you don’t deploy forces into harm’s
way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time
information about what’s taking place, and as a result of not having
that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that
area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not
put forces at risk in that situation.”

Yet Ham himself never referenced any discussions with Panetta or Dempsey when he told Rep.
Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) he was never given the order to secure the
Benghazi consulate. Chaffetz also said Ham told him forces were
available and “had proximity” to the consulate.

Obviously,
whistleblowers providing credible information on both topics would
prove invaluable with regard to giving Americans the truth about what
happened on September 11, 2012, as a well as a motive for the
administration’s disinformation campaign. If Hillary Clinton gave the OK
to sell missiles to “insurgents,” her judgment at the very least, would
be called into question, putting her chances of securing the Democratic
nomination for president in 2016 in serious jeopardy. It would also
reveal the utter callousness and calculated mendacity of a woman who
knows full well “what difference at this point” such a revelation would
make.

Yet
whistleblower testimony regarding pressure to avoid rescuing
Americans–that could possibly be corroborated by the former head of
AFRICOM– would deal this administration a blow from which it might never
recover.

Americans
may countenance many things, but the idea that we would abandon
Americans under fire in Benghazi to protect the Obama administration’s
pre-election narrative that terror was “on the run” isn’t one of them.
Nothing would make Obama’s promise to “fundamentally transform the United States of America ring any more hollow than that.

AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE ENEMY

Are you willing to continue the fight for freedom for our Posterity?

As people who believe in the principles and philosophies of the United States Constitution, we number in the majority. As folks that dare to consider standing against the tyranny being perpetrated by the Obama administration, we are in the majority across this great country. But the clock is ticking. Will we continue to entertain the idea that sitting on the couch complaining as we watch the news on television is an effective strategy, or are we ready to take action, and do more than rally at Tea Party events, or occasionally write an email to our representatives? Are we ready to do more than complain? Are we willing to, as the signers of the Declaration of Independence stated in the last sentence of the document, put on the line our “Lives, Fortunes, and sacred Honor?”

SUPPORT LAW ENFORCEMENT

Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. - E. Vattel

JUST HOW DEVIOUS AND CORRUPT IS OBAMA AND HIS BAND OF MISCREANTS, PERVERTS AND LIARS?

Keeping Track of Obama Lies, Broken Promises

By Peter Andrew – ConservativeAmerican.org – Leading the way Right.

“President Obama is himself a broken promise. The love affair Americans had with the idea of the beautiful racial harmony we would get if we elected a half-black man to the White House has been ruined by the reality that President Obama means nothing that he says and intends to keep none of his promises.” – David Kraemer, ConservativeAmerican.org

The list below contains all of the Obama Administration mistakes, blunders, broken promises, flip flops, gaffes, lies, etc. That’s too long of a name, so we called it “the Official Obama Administration Scandals List.” This list covers Barack Obama and his pals from day one through September 4th, 2011. At that point, the list was discontinued. However, you can see information on more recent scandals on our NEW Obama Scandals List by clicking here! We present this list to you as an accurate and complete historic detail of the Legacy of Lies President Obama leaves behind for the time period starting with his youth and going until September 4th, 2011. Not responsible for any broken or out-of-date links. They worked when we posted them. Some may redirect you to the wayback machine.

You can visit all the pages of the Official Obama Administration Scandals List!

WAKE-UP AMERICA!

BIRTHER REPORT LINK

LINK TO POST & EMAIL

Latest news re: Obama Corruption & Fraud

WHERE'S OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE LINK:

IMPEACH THE USURPER

The case for impeaching Barack Hussein Obama

We the People of the United States

Pending an acceptable outcome of the vitally-important 2014 election—which affords the opportunity to elect a Congress that is willing to initiate impeachment proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama, and thereby stop, or even remove from office, this fraudulent usurper and his inner circle of collaborators—We the People of the United States of America affirm our allegiance to the timeless principles upon which our nation was founded, as set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, and upon the foundation of those principles, declare the causes which impel us to seek this despotic president's impeachment and removal.

We hereby allege that the history of the current President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the American people. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world—

ARTICLE 1—Contempt for the Constitution

Mr. Obama has engaged, throughout his despotic tenure as president, in rule by edict and executive decree, bypassing Congress, and thus the will of the people, to enforce policies entirely of his own creation. Ignoring the federal government's foundation of a separation of powers, he has routinely violated duly enacted statutes of the Legislature, as well as defied the Courts, in pursuit of ultimate supremacy over the United States of America. In so doing, he has exhibited an unmistakable pattern of contempt for the U.S. Constitution, which prior to his ruinous tenure had served two centuries as the Law of the Land.

We therefore demand that this criminal, treasonous individual be removed from office without delay and held accountable for his destructive behavior, and that all his unlawful acts as president be considered of no effect or validity. We believe that the only effective way to achieve this urgent goal is to initiate impeachment.

ARTICLE 2—False pretenses

Mr. Obama has attained the office of president in a verifiably fraudulent and criminal manner, and upon a false identity and false pretenses.

We therefore demand immediate release of all currently sealed documentation of who he is; what his true history entails; what his earlier school, travel, and other records reveal about him; what his original (not photocopied) birth certificate makes clear; and all other relevant information in the public record now suppressed or intentionally falsified regarding him. We the People of the United States have a right to know such things about a man who currently serves as Commander-in-Chief of our nation's armed forces and oversees the entire Executive Branch of the U.S. government. We believe that the only effective way to force release of these records is impeachment.

ARTICLE 3—Criminal fraud

Upon taking office, Mr. Obama criminally defrauded Congress and the American people with false promises, uttered repeatedly in the public record about the nature, scope, and effect of his signature legislative achievement, "Obamacare," in a deceptive effort to gain passage of this catastrophic measure, which authorizes a sweeping federal takeover of America's healthcare industry.

We therefore demand that this healthcare travesty be immediately revoked, defunded, and declared null and void, and that this president be held accountable for intentionally misleading and defrauding the citizenry by means of this insidious scheme—a scheme that has already diminished the rightful choice of most Americans regarding their healthcare, has caused millions to lose their jobs due to its workplace requirements, and will cost our nation its material viability and vitality if allowed to go forward. We believe that the only effective way to ensure the dismantling of Obamacare is impeachment.

ARTICLE 4—Deliberate bankrupting of the U.S.

In a deliberate scheme to force the financial collapse of the United States, Mr. Obama and his collaborators have pushed the nation's "public debt"—that is, the difference between public spending and public receipts—to an unsustainable 17 TRILLION dollars, an amount exceeding our nation's Gross Domestic Product (or total value of goods and services) and more than doubling the debt's previous rate of growth. The effect is to impose an indebtedness of over $50,000 upon every man, woman, and child in the U.S., and more than $150,000 per taxpayer, numbers that indicate the U.S. is headed toward insolvency and our posterity will be forced to bear the dire consequences. The effect is even more dire when "unfunded liabilities" are factored in.

We therefore demand that the individual behind this destructive scheme assume all liability, upon his own person, for the amount the national debt has increased during his tenure, in company with all others who have collaborated with him in the Executive and Legislative Branches of the federal government in enacting this policy, listing them by name, and that the American people at large be absolved—by binding decree—of any and all liability for such wanton abuse of the public purse. We believe that the only effective way to attain such simple, reasonable justice is impeachment.

ARTICLE 5—Treasonous national security policy

By insidious design and outright treachery, Mr. Obama has dangerously weakened America's national security—through his emasculation of our military; his unilateral reduction of our missile defense system, thereby weakening American military superiority and inviting nuclear conflagration at home and abroad; his deceitful promotion and arming of radical Islamic interests in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and elsewhere; his catering, in domestic and foreign policy, to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is on record seeking the destruction of the United States; his fraudulent relations with Iran that will likely ensure this radically hostile nation succeeds in developing nuclear weapons; his continuing disregard for the vital interests of longtime American ally Israel; his unreasonable handicapping of our military's rules of engagement, dangerously favoring America's enemies; his alarming pattern of dismissing high-ranking military officers for groundless or superficial reasons; and similar anti-American policies and actions too numerous to mention.

We therefore demand that the Obama administration be forced immediately to cease and desist from its treasonous, unconstitutional, conspiratorial plot to take down America, and our allies with it, and that a sane, pro-American policy be adopted in its place for the purpose of protecting our nation from all threats to its continuance. We believe that the only effective way to enforce this urgent demand is impeachment.

ARTICLE 6—Treasonous cover-up of Benghazi

Mr. Obama has deceitfully sought to cover up his administration's involvement in a covert operation in Benghazi, Libya, that ran afoul September 11, 2012. The president's fabricated narrative of the causes and nature of the episode, which resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, has been shown to be a cynical attempt to divert attention from what actually happened, including reports of treasonable administration dealings with terrorist insurgents in Syria. The administration's interference with investigations by Congress into the matter, and its the muzzling of witnesses and participants, hints that only the tip of the iceberg has yet been revealed regarding Mr. Obama's contemptuous behavior and dereliction of duty in this bloodstained scandal.

We therefore demand that all witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the truth regarding the Benghazi fiasco be permitted to come forth without threat of retaliation and give their account of any and all relevant facts—including mounting evidence of Obama administration sympathy for Islamic terrorist organizations. We believe that the only effective way to ensure such unsuppressed testimony is impeachment.

ARTICLE 7—Plot to disarm the citizenry

Mr. Obama has repeatedly attempted to take advantage of isolated acts of violence in our nation involving firearms in the hands of deranged individuals to deprive law-abiding Americans of their constitutionally-guaranteed right to keep and bear arms, in a direct assault on the Second Amendment by someone who himself poses a growing threat to the security and well-being of our nation; and he has repeatedly made known his intention to succeed with his unconstitutional goal of disarming the people despite any setbacks he may encounter in Congress. So intent is he on imposing gun control that he even engaged in a deadly gunrunning hoax known as "Fast and Furious" to incite sympathy for tightening U.S. gun laws, then invoked executive privilege to cover up his administration's criminal involvement. He and his administration have also withheld or destroyed vital physical evidence that would corroborate events at Newtown, CT, in which 20 schoolchildren and six adults were reportedly killed by a disturbed gunman with an assault rifle—an incident the president has shamelessly exploited in his push for oppressive new gun legislation.

We therefore demand that the president immediately abandon such pursuit of tyranny and seek refuge in a nation more to his liking, one that already bans, or severely restricts, gun ownership by law-abiding citizens in consequence of despotic notions of governance. We believe that the only way to hasten this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 8—Undermining U.S. border security

Similarly, Mr. Obama has repeatedly sought to undermine U.S. border security, and by extension America's very independence, by pushing misnamed "immigration reform" that would in reality open wide our borders, overburden the public coffers, and grant amnesty to the many millions of unlawful occupiers who have entered the country by stealth. Unable to achieve this agenda lawfully, through Congress, he has undertaken to achieve it dictatorially, in open violation of the Constitution and statutory immigration law. Ostensibly, the president intends, by his abandonment of longstanding U.S. immigration policy, to create a permanent under-culture of dependent immigrants who have little allegiance to America's founding ideals, upon whom to stand to remain in power indefinitely—either by himself, or in the person of likeminded schemers within his party.

We therefore demand that our nation's borders be made effectively secure, that existing immigration laws be reasonably and fairly enforced, that all persons seeking citizenship play fundamentally by the same rules, no matter the petitioners' origins, and that Mr. Obama's immigration policy and initiatives be rejected by Congress as the threat they are to our nation's security and strength, with his deceptive drive for "immigration reform" relegated permanently to the backwaters of history. We believe that the only way to ensure this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 9—Engaging in mass surveillance

Mr. Obama has engaged in notorious overreach regarding domestic surveillance. A certain degree of targeted domestic surveillance may be considered justified, even essential, to protect American citizens from harm if conducted with appropriate oversight and in harmony with reasonable law—but indiscriminate spying on all citizens is indefensible and constitutes the very essence of a police state.

We therefore demand that the routine eavesdropping now being conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) be curtailed to conform with appropriate safeguards, to permit only those functions that can be constitutionally defended. We believe that the only way to leverage this outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 10—Abusing IRS authority

Likewise, Mr. Obama and his IRS subordinates have notoriously abused the public trust by singling out, and arbitrarily penalizing, patriotic organizations awaiting approval of tax-exempt status so they might fundraise legally. By delaying approvals and sharing confidential information with potential adversaries, for purely political reasons, the Obama administration has violated federal statutes, and unlawfully handicapped these groups in their efforts to counter Mr. Obama's tyranny.

We therefore demand substantial monetary damages for these aggrieved organizations, and expedited approval of all "Tea Party," "conservative," and "libertarian" groups in the future. More to the point, because of its unavoidably political nature, we seek abolition of the IRS itself, and its replacement by a reasonable consumption or flat tax. We believe that the only way to bring about such an outcome is impeachment.

ARTICLE 11—Subverting America's morality

Most far-reaching and adverse of all his insidious deeds, in the acknowledged biblical perspective of our Creator, is that Mr. Obama has undertaken to subvert America's moral strength and means of perpetuation by promoting measures that weaken the natural, God-ordained family, and escalate the unthinkable aborting of America's posterity. As part of this corrupt effort, he has sanctioned the unconstitutional silencing of conscientious citizens and clergy who oppose homosexuality and its growing inclusion in lawful marriage; and he has approved stipulations in his healthcare plan that would force Americans opposed to abortion, or to anything related involving abortifacients or contraceptives, to directly fund such morally-offensive practices. These immoral, destructive policies—integral to the president's sweeping plan to transform America—militate not only against the Constitution, but the foundations of Judeo-Christianity upon which America is historically premised, to which the president appears to have an aversion.

We therefore demand that biblical morality be once again allowed the place of respect it has long enjoyed at the center of our nation's culture—on its own merits, without federal interference of any kind that would violate the First Amendment. We also call for immediately ending the moral and material travesty known as "Obamacare," including any requirement that American citizens or businesses personally underwrite abortion. We believe that the best way to ensure this fortuitous outcome, and reverse these federally-enforced intrusions, is the president's impeachment.

In every stage of these and other oppressions that could be cited, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms—but our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury and blatant lies. A fraudulent usurper whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people, much less their president.

We the People, therefore, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do solemnly publish and declare, that because Barack Hussein Obama has verifiably corrupted, compromised, and endangered the essential institutions of the American Republic, as well as threatened the nation's very survival, we hereby appeal to the next Congress of the United States—which will convene in January 2015—to begin impeachment proceedings against Mr. Obama, and his fellow lawbreakers and facilitators within the Executive Branch, for the purpose of removing them from office with all diligence.

For the support of this action, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, We the People mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor, to save our beloved nation and preserve the rights and freedoms bequeathed us by God and protected by our revered Constitution.

The MCSO Cold Case Posse (CCP) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. We are awarded no tax dollars and have no paid staff. We are supported by membership dues as well as donations from corporations and individuals in the county we serve.

If you would like to make a contribution to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Cold Case Posse, please click on the "Donate" button directly below. Your donation is greatly appreciated. Remember, in most cases, your donation to CCP is deductible. Please consult with your tax professional regarding any tax related questions.

By clicking on the below "DONATE" Link, you will be leaving the MCSO Cold Case Posse website. Within a few seconds, your browser will be redirected to a secured Paypal site at which point you can safely and securely make your donation.

Translate

THE TERRY LAKIN STORY

Barack Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally ineligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama was born to a FOREIGN NATIONAL FATHER who was NEVER a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. For no other U.S. President in the history of the nation since the founding generation (who were exempt from the natural born Citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution via a grandfather clause in Article II Section 1) was that the case, i.e., having a foreign national father who was never a U.S. Citizen or even an immigrant to this country. Obama being seated as the putative president is an outrageous violation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, the presidential eligibility clause. Obama was not born with sole allegiance to the USA. Sole allegiance and unity of Citizenship at birth was the goal and purpose for putting the natural born Citizen clause into Article II Section 1 of the Constitution as to who could serve as president once the founding generation has passed away. Obama (II) was born a British Subject via his foreign national father Obama (Sr.) who was a British Subject. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to constitutional standards since he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship. The founders and framers did not want anyone with foreign allegiance to ever get command of our military, i.e., be the president. Obama is constitutionally not eligible to be president and commander in chief of our military.

The Obama constitutional eligibility issue is not a fringe issue! South Carolina Poll Results – A poll done by Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows that almost 2/3 of GOP voters want Obama’s constitutional eligibility and true legal identity investigated. This is not a fringe issue: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=340805

CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR DR. HERB TITUS(Not Mark Levin)
DESCRIBES "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"December 12, 2011 (TPATH) The honorable John Jay, the first leader of the United States Supreme Court, initiated the insertion of "Natural Born Citizen" into the Constitution for the purpose of setting a higher standard for the office of the President.
All of the verbal gymnastics being put forth by the left, as to the meaning of the term, will eventually be proven to be just what it is.
Unlawful defense of an individual and political party at the expense and detriment of this country.
When you watch this video you will begin to wonder how this country continues to allow such simple and precise language to be twisted, manipulated and convoluted.
WATCH THE VIDEO PART ONEWATCH THE VIDEO PART TWO

We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on.

On MARCH 23, 1775, Patrick Henry spoke to the Second Virginia Convention, which was meeting in Richmond's St. John's Church due to British hostilities:

"I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery...

We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated...We have prostrated ourselves before the throne...

Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence."

Patrick Henry continued:

"There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations...who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us.

The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave...

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!

I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."

Miki Booth’s book, Memoirs of a Community Organizer in Hawaii, will be released in late November, 2011. The book chronicles events and experiences over a lifetime culminating in the biggest adventure of all for the writer—an “Adventure in American Politics.” When Miki found others that shared her

Usurper In The White House-Constitutional Crisis

AMERICA IN DISTRESS

Obama Sr a Kenyan was never a US Citizen. He could not pass on US Natural Born Citizenship status to Barack Obama Jr. No matter what is on Obama's birth certificate, no matter where he was born, he can NOT satisfy Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution.....No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of the President, neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Search This Blog

"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."-- Abraham Lincoln

"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."-- John Adams

The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite."-- Thomas Jefferson

"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."-- Samuel Adams

It has been reported how past Hawaiian State practices with its birth certificate procedures have presented opportunities for birth certificate fraud. An example of such fraud is that of Chinese native, Sun Yat Sen, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China but was able to obtain a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth in 1904 based on his fraudulent affidavit and evidence submitted by witnesses to the Hawaiian authorities stating that he was born in Hawaii on November 24, 1870. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii. See also the September 2000 report of the Office of Inspector General, entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud,” which provides an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud, found at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf. Because of critical importance of knowing for sure who the President is, the potential for birth certificate fraud, and since Obama’s original long-form birth certificate housed in the offices of the Hawaii Department of Health can be some type of certificate (even a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth) that is based on some family member’s affidavit of personal knowledge but which includes no documentary evidence of an actual birth in Hawaii, it becomes crucial to confirm whether there exists any corroborating evidence of Obama actually being born in Hawaii. Consequently, various members of the public have tried to obtain information that would adequately confirm Obama’s and the State of Hawaii’s statements that he was born in Hawaii. These concerned citizens have made requests to the State of Hawaii and to various hospitals there for such information. The State of Hawaii, Kapi’olani Medical Center, and Queens Medical Center (originally claimed by Obama’s sister to by his birth place) have publicly stated that they cannot release the needed details of Obama’s birth, including whether his deceased mother was even a maternity patient in any of those hospitals, because of Obama’s state and federal privacy rights. Not being successful, some of these concerned citizens, feeling duty bound to the Constitution and our country, have filed law suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) actions against Obama and others to obtain this information.

Given that Obama and/or his agents have already publicly released some information regarding his place of birth, one commentator, William, has asked me on my blog ( http://puzo1.blogspot.com/. ) whether Obama has waived his privacy rights to such birth information. At least two arguments can be advance that Obama has waived any privacy right that he might have in his birth information located in the State of Hawaii and in its hospitals. One is that he has waived his privacy rights to his alleged long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate by posting his COLB on the internet for the world to see. A problem with this argument is that the COLB does not disclose all his private information (name of hospital, doctors, etc.) and he can argue that his waiver is only as to the information contained on the COLB and no more. As a response, it can be argued that Obama waived his privacy right as to the identity of the hospital in which he was born given that he allegedly wrote a letter dated January 24, 2009 to Kapi’olani Medical Center in which he acknowledge being born there and which letter the hospital posted on its web page (suspiciously posting not a scan of an actual paper letter but only a computer-generated image created with HTML code) for the world to see. For more details, see the WND story on the letter at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104146. I have grave doubts whether this letter is authentic given that both Obama and U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie D-Hawaii, who allegedly gave the letter to the hospital and publicly read the letter during the hospital’s centennial celebration, refuse to confirm whether this letter is real.

The second argument is more powerful and convincing. Under Article II, a would-be President must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the Presidency. Hence, any candidate knows that such “natural born Citizen” status is required to hold the public Office of President. No one winning an election and wanting to fill that public office has a reasonable expectation of privacy as to where he/she was born given that job’s eligibility requirement that one must be a “natural born Citizen.” See my article on this blog entitled, Obama’s Personal Right To Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their President Is, at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html. Of course, that person’s obligation to prove his/her “natural born Citizen” status includes providing credible, competent, and sufficient documentary and other evidence of, among other things, place of birth. Clearly and without doubt, the public interest in knowing that the President-elect is eligible for the office he/she seeks to fill by far out weighs any privacy interest that the person may have in his/her birth documents. It is also clear that knowing who the person is who will occupy the Office of President and Commander in Chief concerns national security and the safety of the United States and the whole world. It is not reasonable to believe that such a person’s privacy interest would out weigh the People’s need to safeguard national security and for self-preservation. Simply put, it would be beyond absurdity to honestly contend that such a person has a right to shield from the same People that he/she is constitutionally duty bound to serve and protect information that he/she must provide to them to show that he/she is qualified for that singular and all-powerful public position which would vest him/her with great power to affect every aspect of the People’s lives.

But underneath the privacy rights question lurks a much more serious concern. We can see the absurdity of Obama sitting on privacy rights to conceal his long-form birth certificate from the public. It is downright despicable for our media and Congress and others to apologize for Obama and let him get away with it. They know full well that he has no such privacy rights. The birth information and documents that Obama refuses to reveal to the public surely are revealing of whether his is eligible to hold the Office of President. Why has the media not filed any legal actions against Obama, the State of Hawaii, and other parties, seeking to legally lift any privacy barriers to Obama’s birth information as it has so many times in the past filed actions against others running for public office who sought to prevent the public from learning details of some aspect of their private lives? What is a travesty of justice is that Obama was probably able to win his U.S. Senate seat because the media (Chicago Tribune) filed a legal action against rival Republican Jack Ryan in which it was successful in getting the “kinky sex” details of his divorce released to the public. Why the media in our country would believe what type of sex two consenting married adults practice is more important than making sure that the national security of our country is protected is beyond comprehension and represents the quintessence of warped priorities. I do not believe that anyone who truly cares about our country and Constitution can express enough in words the outrage that he/she feels about how cowardly our political leaders and media have acted with Obama on the question of his place of birth.

Congress has abdicated its constitutional oath and the media, the so-called fourth branch of our government, has failed to perform its journalistic duty to the People of the United States to assure them that Obama’s election to the highest and most powerful office in the land adhered to our Constitution and laws. Congress has been given a chance to correct its failings and still it refuses to perform its constitutional obligation. With the assistance of its media cronies and others, they all ridicule and suppress the efforts of those who are fighting to make sure that our Constitution has been respected in the last Presidential election and that our nation is safe with Obama currently occupying the Presidency and being the Commander in Chief of our military might.

We must then ask ourselves why Congress and the media have not pressed Obama for the necessary and relevant birth information for at least the sake of the integrity of the Presidential election process and the safety of our nation? Moreover, Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 when Obama was born in 1961 his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was born a British subject/citizen. See Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html. Like a naturalized citizen who is not eligible to be President, Obama was born with an allegiance to a foreign power and is therefore not eligible to be President and more so not eligible to be the leader of our military men and women. To allow Obama to hide his birth information and to not challenge him for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen” is nothing more than at best, politicians and those in their coterie allowing corrupt party politics, self-interest, and/or cowardice to blind their constitutional duty to protect and defend our country and Constitution, at worst, part of someone’s plot to attack and destroy the United States from within, or both. Given that any attack on the United States will most likely come from within, these latter two scenarios must be given serious consideration and ruled out only after sufficient evidence exists to so rule them out. Hence, the deliberate or reckless failing by those who are supposed to protect and defend our country and Constitution is tantamount to treason.

All members of Congress that have allowed and continue to allow the raping of our Constitution and the placing of our nation at risk to being attacked from within need to be removed from Congress, without any exceptions. As to what to do with those members of the media and others who have failed and continue to fail to do their job to adequately protect and defend our Constitutional Republic, that is a question for another day.