However, one thing that is somewhat apparent is that Travers probably isn't a comic book fan. Like most people, his main Batman references are the old TV show and the other versions of Batman that have appeared on film. Sure, he makes an allusion to Frank Miller--which doesn't necessarily mean he's read Miller's bat-work so much as heard about it. Even if he had read The Dark Knight Returns or Year One. I doubt he has put as much thought into it as we, the comic geek community have, over the last 20 odd years or so. I'm even more doubtful that he knows about Alan Moore's interpretation of the Joker or Morrison's, not to mention the Englehart/Rogers, O'neil Adams or Dini/Timm interpretations of these characters.

So, when the new movie opens, while the average movie-goer will, mostl likely, be raving about Ledger's 'chilling performance' as the Joker, the average comic book fan will just be whining about all the ways he 'got it wrong' (ironic considering that, even within comics, the characters are interpreted differently by different creators and have no 'one true version' so to speak).

My question is this: Do we, as fans/scholars of these texts, have so much invested in these characters that we kind of ruin it for ourselves?

I responded

We don't ruin anything by developing taste. I used to think Lawnmower Man was the best movie ever made, but after you expose yourself to a lot of movies you won't think that anymore. Same goes for versions of Batman.

Scott wrote

What I meant was something more along the lines of: "Just because the Bale/Nolan version isn't Miller's or O'Neil's or Morrison's... does that mean it's bad?" There tend to be a lot of decisions made before something has even been given a fair shot. There are already people out there who are deciding "If this isn't a faithful adaption of The Killing Joke... I'm not going to like it."

It's kind of like the guy who insist that the book is better than the movie when, a lot of times, the movie really is better (Jaws, Godfather, Silence of the Lambs, most of Stephen King's work... and, in pure defiance geek laws, I actually like the Lord of the Rings movies BETTER than the books). So, I don't think it's so much a question of taste as it is emotional attachment to the source material. I of course do not think that YOU, Geoff KIock, do this and realize that your dislike of Batman Begins is purely based on its aesthetics as a film : )

One big problem is too many fans make "faithful" into a big part of their criteria. I showed my students six film versions of the dagger of the mind speech from MacBeth, and they all liked the Polanski version best because of took the lest amount of liberty with the source material. Throne of Blood was right out for most of them. A film needs to reinvent the material for itself, as much as a new creative team on a comic book should.

2 comments:

You like the LOTR films better because there's some humanity in the characters in that version, rather than just a lament to death of classic civilization--all right that's me. Except for the Scouring of the Shire. They should've kept something like that.

I sometimes wonder why people don't approach adaptations the way they do songs, just as standards or in covers, but I suppose I can guess. The first exposure sets the "right take" to be faithful to for most people and, this is a bit confusing and problematic when, at least for most comic book characters, you're talking about corporate icons that are passed between many creators, but I know I assign some virtue to "faithfulness"to the original creator's intent, even when changes are an improvement.

And of course there are the two types of expectations that you mention can be dashed. The Joker not wearing gloves in the new movie (a complaint I overheard at Midtown Comics the other day) vs disapproving of Batman Begins say. Something aesthetic vs something...eh...thematic? Not that aesthetics can't be used to express more.

But this sort of audience anxiety comes from being fannish toward anything--but what you may have lost in not liking something on the first level you make up in appreciating in depth.

LOTR - I grew up on the books, but I have to admit that the movie exceeded my expectations. I have some problems with the last hour of the third film, but no one has anything to be ashamed of. Jackson took some liberties with things, as he should have, to make his point. Along with the success of Hellboy, I'm more than ready for 'The Hobbit'.

Batman - I'm cautiously optimistic for this and the whole thing for my rides on how well the Joker gets done. Because, thanks to Ledger, they've got one chance to get this right (I HATED the Nicholson Joker - but not as much as I hated the rest of the film)

About Me

Geoff Klock has a big degree from a fancy-pants university. He wrote some books on superheroes and poetry like 10 years ago. Also essays on film, and TV and teaching. You have Google, right? He spoke at the Met once, and inspired a name of a villain in Matt Fraction's Casanova, which is a really good comic book. He made a crazy mash up of like 200 movie and TV clips quoting Hamlet. Geoff teaches mostly writing, but also Old Brit Lit and Film, at BMCC. He rides a bicycle to get there. He is very good at Facebook?

Email Me

Twitter Updates

Regular Guest Bloggers

Jason Powell has taken on the yeoman's job of doing an issue by issue analysis of Chris Claremont's 17 year Uncanny X-Men run in an effort to make me feel bad for saying Morrison invented all kinds of things he did not in his New X-Men run, and for spelling Claremont "Clairmont" in my superhero book.

Scott McDarmont (Scott91777) is an Instructor Of English at Radford University, Radford VA, an avid reader of books by guys named Chuck, he usually “waits for the trade” on comics unless Frank Miller is somehow involved. He owns more Def Leppard CDs than Bob Dylan CDs and he is ‘Ok’ with this and, while he may answer different publicly, he secretly feels that The Empire Strikes Back is the best movie ever made. He also feels that there are two kinds of people in the world: Indiana Jones people and John McClane people. He considers himself an Indiana Jones person

Jill Duffy, girl reporter, is a professional writer and editor in New York. She spent five years covering video game development in both San Francisco and London, examining the art, science, and business of the industry, and in 2006 was named one of the top 100 most influential women in the game industry. Her work has appeared in The Examiner newspaper in San Francisco, where she was the food section editor, as well as Game Developer, Gamasutra.com, Intelligent Enterprise, DigitalTrends.com, and several other publications. She holds a BA in English from the University at Buffalo. Indeed, she is on the Twitter and also keeps a blog about food.

Andy Bentley is a graphic designer in upstate New York. The first series of Batman movies got him in a comic book store and the DC animated series made him a life long fan. His senior thesis was a short film on the culture of comic books. Animal Man, Starman, and Preacher are among his favorite comic runs. He is an avid toy collector and enjoys playing basketball, mash-ups, karaoke and dark beers. He will be sequestered most of September with The Beatles: Rock Band.