Comments on: Abouthttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/
The premiere natural history program on television.Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:21:00 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6.1By: angiehttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/#comment-173749
Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:31:00 +0000http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/2008/06/04/overview-3/#comment-173749I wish I could just touch them
]]>By: antidisestablishmentarianismhttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/#comment-173236
Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:27:00 +0000http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/2008/06/04/overview-3/#comment-173236This is about the Antarctic, not the Artic different side of the globe no polar bears just penguins, ones a continent one isn’t. It’s hard to take your prediction of 2030 with no scientific evidence or even a slight grasp on geography or the natural world. Yes we should limit the resources we use to save the planet but shouting wrong so called facts on the bottom of an eloquently written piece on a beautiful species will only give people ammunition to ignore an important message.
Please research a little and find out how to help the earth without scare tactics you are like the ukip of animals …. Thanks
]]>By: jellydonuthttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/#comment-170371
Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:21:00 +0000http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/2008/06/04/overview-3/#comment-170371does it let u choose a penguin?
]]>By: Guesthttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/#comment-170219
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:55:00 +0000http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/2008/06/04/overview-3/#comment-170219u r tottly right!!!!
]]>By: Guesthttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/#comment-170218
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:38:00 +0000http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/2008/06/04/overview-3/#comment-170218this is boring
]]>By: ashhttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/#comment-169404
Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:11:00 +0000http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/2008/06/04/overview-3/#comment-169404asdfgjkl;’
zxcvbnm,./asdfghj
]]>By: nonehttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/#comment-165877
Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:29:00 +0000http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/2008/06/04/overview-3/#comment-165877this is an old website
]]>By: Brihttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/penguins-of-the-antarctic-introduction/181/#comment-111384
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:16:14 +0000http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/2008/06/04/overview-3/#comment-111384Sad Sack: I am sad to see the condition of penguins, their little kids and all other animals, birds, plants and poor humans. Powerful, greedy & fanatical people are the evil that need to get extinct. Is there some way nature can do that?

Response: I am shocked to read such hateful words! Who are the powerful, greedy and fanatical people anyway? Al Gore, who as the major swindler of the Global Warming con, won’t debate scientists who have opposing evidence, or could it be GE who profit from their ‘green’ campaign? Or could it be the politicians who get money from the green movement lobbyists and who in turn, give subsidies of taxpayer monies to wasteful and ineffective products? What about those responsible for the professional assassination of scientists who, WITH EVIDENCE, speak out against this scam and are discredited in their fields for their actual integrity to the scientific process. While many of you who (and I hate to resort to negative judgements without knowing you because I’m sure you’re intelligent people with a desire to learn about the world around you which is admirable) seem to be regurgitating the propaganda PBS spews will be bursting to exclaim, ‘they were discredited because they’re wrong!’ I will remind you that regardless of the issue, any person or organization–including government–should not so swiftly discredit and take scientists’ careers for their search of knowledge. Because while they are not wrong, even if they were, in America researchers should have the freedom to discuss their findings without fear. (Remember how communists manipulate the pursuit of science??) I sincerely hope that you guys will keep an open mind and actually research the issue yourselves–don’t be afraid to look at anti- as well as pro-global warming information and make your own conclusions. Arm yourself with facts and information and you won’t have to resort to name-calling or morally objectionable comments about the hopeful extinction of people who don’t agree with you. Peace!