On the one hand, a portion of Twitter’s user base took advantage of auto-following in order to rapidly, and therefore inauthentically, raise their profile and their seeming popularity on Twitter in order to give themselves an air of trustworthiness they would otherwise lack. There are a number of places where you can find lists of auto-following Twitter accounts, which a new Twitter user could follow to quickly build up their “fan base.” (For example here and here.)

In addition, several third-party applications previously offered Auto Follow as a service, as it was permitted until late last week through the Twitter API, though it was no longer a feature available directly on Twitter itself. One such service, Twitter Auto Follow Back, even had its own hashtag (#TeamFollowBack) whose junk tweets you may have spotted in your own Twitter stream from time to time. It claims to have handled over 334,000,000 Twitter followers to date.

Others, like SocialOomph, for example, offer a suite of tools that help Twitter users better manage their accounts, of which Auto Follow was only one option. SocialOomph has since had to overhaul its service to accommodate the new rules. As of today, users will have to manually vet new followers in order to engage with them through other means, including DMs (direct messages) and Auto DMs, the latter of which was oddly not disallowed via Twitter’s API changes, though often more obnoxious to recipients due to their overly solicitous or spammy nature.

“Our system still automatically applies certain user-defined criteria to new followers and only presents those new followers that the user would want to follow-back for manual approval,” explained Patricia Morris on behalf of SocialOomph (via email). “The ‘undesirable’ new followers are automatically excluded, and that automated exclusion is not prohibited by Twitter’s rules.” She also referred to the change as “very shoddy and amateurish behavior of Twitter to spring this rule change as a surprise on developers with absolutely no prior warning or road map.” However, that seems par for the course for Twitter, which routinely sidelines third-party Twitter developers like those offering alternative clients, for example.

Twitter explained the decision to end the Auto Follow as being in the best interest of its users. As noted by a member of Twitter’s Platform Operations team in the comments section of the blog post quietly announcing the news just before the July 4 holiday in the U.S., accounts which engage in the immediate follow-back may find themselves with noisy timelines.

This practice, however, has been a common means of establishing a new, high-profile account’s worthiness and authenticity, something Twitter almost necessitated due to its otherwise opaque procedures for having a Twitter account “verified” (i.e. given a seal that indicates the person is who they claim to be).

Where Auto Follow Made (A Little?) Sense

The flip side of the argument against automation is that there are a number of accounts on Twitter that use the service differently than the average user. For example, businesses and brands that want to communicate, market to, or provide support to their customers would often auto-follow their followers so they could better communicate with them privately through direct messages.

This was especially important when a customer wanted to provide the business with personal information like their name, address, phone or email. Though in theory, an immediate return follow by a business may prompt the consumer to engage with a company through a DM, in practice, users tend to simply tweet their questions and frustrations (sometimes not even referencing the business’s Twitter handle) into the air, and then are either surprised by a reply or ignored by the business in question. On the occasion a connection is actually made, the business’s rep still generally has to prompt the user to follow them so they can DM back and forth. This behavior really isn’t impacted by Twitter’s new rules.

“They also made it clear early-on that automated unfollowing was a risky endeavor. I always kind of felt that auto-follow-back would eventually be against Twitter’s terms of service, so we never included it as a feature in Friend or Follow,” he says.

The practice remained acceptable for some time as high-profile accounts like @britneyspears would attempt to follow all their fans back. But as Twitter grew in size — today it has over 200 million monthly actives — it has become more and more uncommon. Reagan points out that even some of the most heavily followed accounts today only return-follow a small selection of their fans.

While the Auto Follow may have become unfashionable and unsustainable, at the end of the day, the fact that Twitter decided to finally switch off the feature via API is also, to some extent, an admission that its previous spam reporting system has failed. Case in point, one commenter on the Twitter blog post even suggested a crowdsourced model where users can mark Twitter accounts as being spam as an alternative to switching off Auto Follow — apparently not realizing that the feature has existedfor years.

Twitter’s crackdown is merely a Band-Aid on the larger problem with the network’s design: that its users have been taught to value an easily gameable metric like follower count as one of a success, instead of focusing on the quality of a user’s content. That’s not a problem unique to Twitter, of course — it seems to be the nature of social media in general, sadly.