Lecture 10

The Age of Totalitarianism: Stalin and Hitler

We live, not feeling the country beneath us,
Our speech inaudible ten steps away,
But where they're up to half a conversation --
They'll speak of the Kremlin mountain man.

His thick fingers are fat like worms,
And his words certain as pound weights.
His cockroach whiskers laugh,
And the tops of his boots glisten.

And all around his rabble of thick-skinned leaders,
He plays through services of half-people.
Some whistle, some meow, some snivel,
He alone merely caterwauls and prods.

Like horseshoes he forges decree after decree --
Some get it in the forehead, some in the brow,
some in the groin, and some in the eye.
Whatever the execution -- it's a raspberry to him
And his Georgian chest is broad.

---Osip Mandelstam, We Live, Not Feeling, 1934?

The Age of Anxiety, the age of the lost generation, was also an age in
which modern Fascism and Totalitarianism made their appearance on the historical stage. By
1939, liberal democracies in Britain, France, Scandinavia and Switzerland were realities.
But elsewhere across Europe, various kinds of dictators reared their ugly heads.
Dictatorship seemed to be the wave of the future. It also seemed to be the wave of the
present. After all, hadn't Mussolini proclaimed that this century would be a century of
the right? Of Fascism? And this is what bothered such writers as Arthur Koestler
(1905-1983), Yevgeny Zamyatin (1884-1937), Aldous
Huxley (1894-1963), Karel Capek (1890-1938) and
George Orwell (1903-1950). It
was a nightmare world in which human individuality was subsumed under the might of
totalitarian collectivism. The modern totalitarian state rejected liberal values and
exercised total control over the lives of its subjects. In this way,
totalitarianism became a new POLITICAL
RELIGION for the Age of Anxiety. How this indeed occurred is the
subject of this lecture.

It goes without saying that the governments of Europe had been conservative and
anti-democratic throughout their long histories. The leaders of such governments --
whether monarch or autocrat -- WERE the government, and by their very nature, prevented
any incidence of social or political change that might endanger the existing social order.
Of course, there have been enlightened monarchs but few of them would have been so
enlightened to have removed themselves from the sinews of power.

Before the 19th century these monarchs legitimized their rule by recourse to the divine
right theory of kingship, an idea which itself appeared in medieval Europe. Such was the
case in France until the late 18th century when French revolutionaries decided to end the
Bourbon claim to the throne by divine right by cutting off the head of Louis XVI. Of
course, France ended up with Napoleon who also
claimed the divine right of kingship. Only this time, divine right emanated from Napoleon
himself. In a country such as England, on the other hand, twenty years of civil war in the
17th century as well as the Glorious
Revolution of 1688, produced a constitutional monarchy.

In the 19th century, it was the dual revolution -- the Industrial and French Revolutions -- which created the
forces of social change which monarchs, enlightened or not, could not fail to take heed. A
large middle class had made its appearance in the 18th century but lacked status. Now, in
the 19th century, this large class of entrepreneurs, factory owners, civil servants,
teachers, lawyers, doctors, merchants and other professionals wanted their voices heard by
their governments. They became a force which had to be reckoned with and the government
began to utilize its talents by creating large, obedient bureaucracies. In this way,
government seemed to reflect the interests of all when in actual fact, they represented
the interests of the bourgeoisie. So European governments maintained order by giving the
middle classes a stake in the welfare of the nation. Governments also built strong police
forces and armies of loyal soldiers. Meanwhile, the great mass of people, the
"swinish multitude," lay completely unrepresented. And radicals were either
imprisoned or exiled because of their liberal, democratic, socialist, communist or
anarchist inclinations.

Despite these measures, and there were others as well, traditional authoritarian
governments were not completely successful. Their power and their objectives were limited.
These governments lacked modern communications and modern transportation. They lacked, in
other words, the ability to totally control their subject populations. The twentieth
century -- thanks to improved technology -- would change all that. In fact, it can be said
that true totalitarian regimes are limited only by the extent to which mass communications
have been made a reality. And, of course, with mass communications comes mass man, and the
capability of total control.

Following World War One, there was a revival of traditional authoritarian regimes,
especially in Eastern Europe. By 1938, of all the central and eastern European countries,
only Czechoslovakia remained true to liberal political ideals. It has been remarked that
the reason for this development was the perception that liberal democracy was a failure.
It was not "made" for Eastern European nations. These nations lacked a tradition
of self-government but they did have lengthy traditions of ethnic conflict as well as a
steady growth in nationalism. As agrarian nations, the large landowners and the Church
opposed any efforts at land reform. These countries also contained a small and relatively
weak middle class. In a way, the 18th century seemed to have ignored these countries.
Finally, for nations such as Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Austria and Estonia, it was the
Great Depression that dashed any hopes for a liberal government based on the western
model.

Although many of these central and eastern European countries would adopt fascist
characteristics, their general aim in doing so was not to become fascist themselves.
Instead, their aim was to maintain the established order. They wanted to avoid revolution
and more important, they wanted to avoid another world war.

Modern totalitarian regimes made their appearance with the total effort required by the
Great War. The reason for this is quite simple -- war required all institutions to
subordinate their interests to one objective at all costs: victory. The individual had to
make sacrifices and so their freedoms, whatever they might have been, were constantly
reduced by increasing government intervention. The invisible hand of Adam Smith had to be
replaced by the visible hand. Governments could not longer remain idle hoping that some
"laissez-faire" mentality would carry them through the day. No. Governments had
to intervene and the great event which made this notion of intervention a necessity, was
the Great War.

Beyond this, the crucial experience of World War I was
Lenin,
the Bolsheviks and the Russian Civil War.
Lenin had shown how a dedicated minority -- the Bolsheviks -- could make a dedicated
effort and achieve victory over a majority. This was as true of the Revolution as much as
it was of the Civil War when the Bolsheviks overcame the White Army who were numerically
superior. Lenin also clearly demonstrated how institutions and human rights might be
subordinated to the needs of a single party and a single leader. So, Lenin provided a
model for a single party dictatorship, i.e. the Bolsheviks. It was Lenin, who provide the
model for Stalin
as well as Hitler
and Mussolini.

Totalitarian regimes -- thanks to technology and mass communications -- take over
control of every facet of the individual's life. Everything is subject to control -- the
economy, politics, religion, culture, philosophy, science, history and sport. Thought
itself becomes both a form of social control as well as a method of social control. Those
of you familiar with Orwell's premonitionary novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four, should
have an easy time understanding this development.

The totalitarian state was based on boundless dynamism. Totalitarian society was a
fully mobilized society, a society constantly moving toward some goal. Which begs the
question: Is democracy the means to an end or the end itself? Paradoxically, the
totalitarian state never reached its ultimate goal. However, it gave the illusion of doing
so. As soon as one goal was reached, it was replaced by another. Such was the case in
Stalin's Russia.
Stalin implemented a series of Five Year Plans in an effort to build up the industrial
might of the Soviet Union. Production quotas were constantly announced well before they
had been reached in order to supply the illusion that the Five Year Plan was working. But
before the Five Year Plan had run its course, another Five Year Plan was announced.
Hopefully, you can intuit the psychological necessity of such an act on Stalin's part.

In the end, totalitarianism meant a "permanent revolution," an
unfinished revolution in which rapid and profound change imposed from above simply went on
forever. Of course, a permanent revolution also means that the revolution is never over.
The individual is constantly striving for a goal which has been placed just a hair out of
reach. In this way, society always remains mobilized for continual effort. The first
example of such a permanent revolution the "revolution from
above," instituted by Joseph Stalin in 1927 and 1928. After having suppressed his enemies on
both the left and the right, as well as the center, Stalin issued the "general party
line." Anyone who deviated from that line was condemned to either exile or execution
-- in most cases, execution. Stalin's aim was to create a new kind of society and a new
human personality to inhabit that society: socialist man and socialist woman
-- Homo Sovieticus. At the same
time, a strong army would have to be built as well as a powerful industrial economy. Once
everything was owned by the State, Stalin believed, a new kind of human personality would
emerge. The Soviets under Stalin were by no means successful. Just the same, the Soviets
did build a new society, one whose basic outlines survived right down to the late 1980s.

However, Stalinist society did have its frightening aspects and none was more
frightening than the existence of brutal, unrestrained police terrorism. First used
against the wealthy peasants or kulaks during the 1920s and 1930s, terror was increasingly
used against party members, administrators and ordinary people. No one would ever be above
suspicion -- except Stalin, of course. Some were victims of terror for deviating from the
party line -- others were victims for no apparent reason other than Stalin's moodiness.
One Soviet recalled that in 1931, "we all trembled because there was no way of
getting out of it. Even a Communist can be caught. To avoid trouble became an
exception."

As we now know, Stalin's second wife also publicly rebuked Stalin for the destruction
the terror famine was working and she committed suicide in 1932. And on December 1, 1934,
Sergei Kirov, the man who in some circles was rumored to be Stalin's heir, was
assassinated in Leningrad on Stalin's orders. Using Kirov's death as an excuse, Stalin
systematically purged the Communist Party of his opponents. Hundreds of party members were
shot for their alleged complicity in Kirov's death. Kirov was a full member of the ruling
Politburo and leader of the Leningrad party apparatus as well as an influential member of
the ruling elite. His overt concern for the welfare of the Leningrad workers and his skill
as an orator earned him considerable popularity. It is doubtful that Kirov represented a
serious threat to Stalin, however, Kirov did disagree with Stalin on several key issues.

But Stalin had already begun to doubt the loyalty of the Leningrad party and he looked
for a pretext to begin a broad purge. The murder of Kirov was necessary. Although it was
Leonid Nikolaev who committed the assassination, it is now clear that the whole episode
had been, over a period of two years, crafted by Stalin and the NKVD. Stalin, of course,
then used the crime as an excuse to introduce severe laws against all political crimes.
So, following the death of Kirov at the end of 1934, there began the Soviet witch-hunt
which culminated in the Great Terror of the years 1935-1939.

In 1936, Stalin brought his old comrades Zinoviev
and Kamenev to a staged public trial. An international press corps was invited to lend a
sense of legitimacy to the proceedings. When their trial had ended Zinoviev, Kamenev and
fourteen other old Bolsheviks either admitted involvement in the Kirov Affair or signed
confessions that had been fabricated for them. These men had not been conspirators but
they did satisfy Stalin's paranoia. As to be expected, they were all executed. The
confessional process was helped by the black jack, continuous interrogation and the swan
dive, where towelling was put between the jaws and the feet and tightened, arching and
breaking the back. But often, the confession was voluntary because the Party demanded it.
As one survivor recalled, "serving the party was not just a goal in life but an inner
need."

In January 1937 a second great show trial was held in which seventeen leading
Bolsheviks declared that they had knowledge of a conspiracy between Trotsky and
the German and Japanese intelligence services by which Soviet territory was to be
transferred to Germany and Japan. A crowd of 200,000 packed Red Square in frigid weather
to hear Nikita Khrushchev read out the death sentences. All seventeen were executed. Then
on June 11, 1937, the cream of the Red Army, stripped of their medals and insignia, were
ushered into the courtroom. They included Marshal Tukhachevsky, the most brilliant soldier
of his generation and the pioneer of armored and airborne warfare. The generals were
accused of spying for the Germans, found guilty, shot and dumped in a trench on a
construction site, all within eighteen hours. Six of the officers who condemned them were
soon shot. Of 85 corps commanders 57 disappeared within a year. Of the 100,000 Red Army
officers on active duty in 1937, perhaps 60,000 were purged.

The last of the public trials took place in March 1938, as twenty-one leading
Bolsheviks, including
Nikolai
Bukharin (1888-1938), confessed to similar charges and were executed. Also to go was
Yagoda, Stalin's hand-picked head of the NKVD.

These public show trials and the secret trials of the generals provide only a faint
idea of the extent of the Great Terror. Every member of Lenin's Politburo except Stalin
and Trotsky were either killed or committed suicide to avoid execution. A partial list of
those who ceased to exist would include:

--two vice-commissars of foreign affairs
--most of the ambassadors in the Soviet diplomatic corps
--numerous members of the Central Committee of the Communist Party
--almost all the military judges who had sat in judgment and had condemned
--the Red Army generals
--two successive heads of the NKVD
--the prime ministers and chief officials of all the non-Russian Soviet republics
--the director of the Lenin Library
--the man who had led the charge against the Winter Palace in 1917
--a 70 year old schoolteacher who owned a book which included a picture of Trotsky
--an 85 year old woman who made the sign of the Cross when a funeral passed
--a man who took down a portrait of Stalin while painting a wall

Not since the days of the Inquisition had the test of ideological loyalty been applied
to so many people. And not since the days of the French Revolution had so many died for
failing the test. Arrests multiplied tenfold in 1936 and 1937. Anything was used as an
excuse for an arrest: dancing too long with a Japanese diplomat, not clapping loudly
enough or long enough after one of Stalin's speeches, buying groceries from a former
kulak. People went to work one day and simply did not return -- they were either killed
immediately or sent to the GULAG.
The NKVD employed millions of secret informers who infiltrated every workplace. Most
academics and writers came to expect arrest, exile and prison as part of their lives. A
historian could be sent to exile for describing Joan of Arc as nervous and tense just when
the general party line wished her described as calm in the face of death. When a
linguistic theory that held that all language was derived from four sounds was accepted as
official, professors who opposed this view had their books confiscated. By 1938 at least
one million people were in prison, some 8.5 million had been arrested and sent to the
GULAG and nearly 800,000 had been executed. In fact, before the KGB was dissolved in 1991,
it was revealed that 47 million Soviet citizens had died as a result of forced
collectivization and the purges. That figure, of course, represents the recorded tally.
How many more people died without being recorded is a matter of conjecture.

There is no doubt in anyone's mind that Stalin wanted to destroy any possibility of
future conspiracies. So he trumped up charges against anyone who could conceivably become
a member of a regime that might make the attempt to replace his own. He did this to
maintain his power. He also did this, as his biographers are quick to point out, because
he was paranoid. Despite the upheaval of the constant purge trials, the Soviet state did
not break down. New bureaucrats were found to replace the old. New Stalin-trained
officials filled all top-level posts and terror became one of the principal features of
the government itself. In the end, the purgers were also purged. They were the scapegoats
used by Stalin to carry out the Great Terror. Meanwhile, Trotsky had been out of Russia
for years but he continued to use his pen to attack Stalin in his journal, The Bulletin
of the Opposition. In Stalin's eyes, Trotsky could not be left free.

Stalin's purges baffled nearly all foreign observers. He saw threats everywhere. Were
they real? Leading Communists confessed to crimes against the State they never committed.
Some were brainwashed, others tortured. Still others, like Nikolai Bukharin, were shot in
the head. And eventually, even Trotsky was murdered in Mexico City in 1940, an ice pick to
the head.

Soviet life in the 1930s, purge trials aside, was one of constant propaganda and
indoctrination. Party members lectured to workers in factories and peasants in the field.
Newspapers, films and radio broadcast endless socialist achievements and capitalist evil.
Art, literature, film and science were politicized -- sovietized. The intellectual elite
of the 1930s were ordered by Stalin to become "engineers of human souls"
or, as Maxim Gorky put it, the "CRAFTSMEN OF
CULTURE." Russian nationalism had to be glorified. Capitalism was portrayed as the greatest of
evils. Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great were resurrected and depicted as the
forerunners of Stalin. History had to be rewritten. "Who controls the past, controls
the future; who controls the present controls the past," wrote Orwell. Stalin rarely
appeared in public but his presence was everywhere: portraits, statues, books, films and
quotations from his idiotic books surrounded the Soviet man and woman.

Life was hard inside Soviet Russia and the standard of living declined in the 1930s,
despite Stalin's claim that the Five Year Plans had modernized the nation. Black bread and
shabby clothes came to represent the Russian masses. There were constant shortages of food
although heavily taxed vodka was always available. Housing was poor and in short supply.

Although life was hard, the Soviet people were by no means hopeless. The average
Russian saw himself heroically building the world's first socialist society while
capitalism was crumbling in the west. On the positive side, the Soviet worker received
social benefits such as old age pensions, free medical services, free education and even
day care facilities. Unemployment was technically non-existent and there was the
possibility of personal advancement. The key to advancement was specialized skills and a
technical education. Rapid industrialization under the Five Year Plans required massive
numbers of experts, technocrats, skilled workers, engineers and managers. So the State
provided economic incentives for those people who would faithfully serve the needs of the
State. But for the unskilled, low wages were the rule. But, the State dangled high
salaries and special housing to those members of the growing technical and managerial
elite. This elite joined forces with the "engineers of the human mind" to
produce a new social class -- and all this in a supposedly classless society.

Stalin's ego mania and paranoia eventually contributed to the near destruction of
Soviet Russia. His perpetual and pathological lying and deception, culminating in the
infamous purge trials of the 1930s, took the Soviet Union down a road out of which it is
now slowly recovering, if, in fact, it ever will recover. I am reminded of the political
history of the Roman Empire following the death of Augustus Caesar in 14 A.D. First
Caligula, then Nero, Commodus, Severus and so on -- 250 years of military assassinations,
strangulations and poisoning.

In the 1770s, Edward Gibbon sat down to complete his major work of historical
scholarship, The Decline and Fall of
the Roman Empire. In it, he says, "The story of Rome's ruin is simple and
obvious and instead of inquiring why the Roman Empire was destroyed we should rather be
surprised that it had subsided for so long.... The stupendous fabric yielded to the
pressure of its own weight." Now, I don't mean to take the position that Soviet
Russia was identical to the Roman Empire, but I do think that we should be surprised that
Stalinist Russia existed for so long. In retrospect, however, we should acknowledge the
terror, criminality and totalitarian regime of Joseph Stalin. This is
indeed what Nikita Khrushchev did in his SECRET SPEECH of
1956, three years after Stalin's death.

Despite all that has been said, popular memory reveals that of all the totalitarian
regimes of the 20th century, none was more terrifying than that of Nazi Germany. As a
product of Hitler, Germany's social and political situation, and the general attack on
liberalism, Nazi Germany emerged rapidly after 1933 when Hitler came to power. The Nazis
smashed all independent organizations, mobilized the economy and began the systematic
extermination of the Jewish and other non-German populations.

The story of Hitler is well-known -- there is an entire Hitler industry of book
publishing these days, unmatched only by books on the JFK assassination. Why this might be
the case is rather obvious. Hitler seemed to be evil incarnate. So too was Stalin. But
then again, the west did not fight a war, not a hot one, at least, against Stalin. We also
have more information regarding the Nazis than we do Stalin, whose regime was always
clouded in secrecy. The Nazis, on the other hand, kept good records. In his now classic
work, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William Shirer mentions that in
1945 the U.S. First Army seized 485 tons of records of the German Foreign Office in the
Harz Mountains as they were about to be burned on orders from Berlin. Such a figure, it
must be added, represents only part of the whole.

Hitler was born in Austria in 1889 (for more on Hitler, see Lecture
9). He dropped out of school at age 14 and then spent
four years as a tramp before he left his home for Vienna to become an artist. He applied
to the Imperial Academy of Fine Arts and was denied admission. He was told he had no
artistic talent. Back on the streets, the tramp Hitler began to absorb a nationalist
ideology. In Vienna he discovered that the Germans were a superior race of people and the
natural masters of the inferior races of Europe. He also learned his anti-Semitism, racism
and hatred of all Slavic people. An ex-monk by the name of Lanz von Liebenfels inspired
Hitler's twisted Darwinism. Liebenfels stressed the superiority of the Germans, the
inevitability of racial conflict and the inferiority of the Jews. The master race, by its
very nature, had to grow. Selective breeding and the systematic sterilization of inferior
races was the answer.

When war
broke out in 1914, Hitler believed he had found salvation. The struggle and discipline of
war gave meaning to Hitler's life. Life was struggle and so too was war. What better
atmosphere for Hitler to further develop his nationalist and social Darwinist sentiments.
But when defeat came in 1918, Hitler's world was shattered. The war had been his reason
for living. What could have happened? Well, for Hitler, the Jews and Marxists had stabbed
Germany in the back. Therefore, these parasitic intellectuals ought to be removed.

Back home following the war, Hitler began to make wild speeches to small audiences in
the streets. He didn't care if many people heard him out, only that he could articulate
his message of anti-Semitism and German nationalism. And people did listen to Hitler. And
they began to take seriously what he gesticulated on the streets. By 1921, Hitler had
become the leader of a small but growing political party. It is interesting to note that
Hitler shared very little of the interests of this party, instead, he simply took it over
because he needed a party of his own. The German Workers' Party
denounced all Jews, Marxists and liberals. They promised national socialism. They used
propaganda and theatrical rallies. They wore special badges and uniforms and as they
marched, robotlike, through the streets of M�nich, they rendered their special salute.
Most effective of all their tools was the mass rally -- a rally made for mass man. Songs
were sung, slogans were cast about. It was a revivalist movement, or at least it had the
atmosphere of a religious revival. Hitler was a charismatic speaker and easily worked his
audiences up into a frenzy.

Party membership began to grow. In 1923, Hitler launched a plot to march on
M�nich, a plot that eventually failed and sent Hitler to prison for five years. At his
trial, Hitler presented his own program to solve Germany's problems. The audience listened
and he began to attract their attention. He dared utter what everyone knew all along but
were afraid to express. A new wave of converts began to side with the German Workers'
Party. While in prison, Hitler wrote Mein Kampf.
Its basic themes were German racial superiority, virulent anti-Semitism, the concept of Lebensraum,
or living space, pan-Germanism and the necessity of yet another war. The Nazis now had
their Bible.

By 1928, the Nazi Party now had 100,000 members and Hitler had absolute control. The
Nazis were still a marginal political group but world events in 1929 and 1930 produced a
new mania for the Hitler program. Unemployment stood at 1.3 million in 1929. The following
year, it had risen to 5 million while industrial production in 1932 fell by more than 50%.
In that same year, 43% of all Germans were unemployed. Hitler now began to promise Germany
economic salvation as well as military and political restitution for the "war guilt clause"
specified at Versailles. He focused on the middle and lower middle classes---the office
workers, civil servants and teachers. These were the people who had barely survived
through the period of wild inflation following World War One. These were the people who
were begging for salvation.

The Nazis also made their appeal to GERMAN
YOUTH. Hitler and his aides were, in general, much younger than other leading
politicians. In 1931, for instance, 40% of all Nazis were under thirty years of age, 70%
were under 40. This is quite different from what we would find in Stalinist Russia at the
same time. National recovery, rapid change and personal advancement formed the main appeal
of the Nazi Party. By 1932, Hitler had gained the support of key people in the army and in
big business. These individuals thought they could use Hitler for their own financial
interests. So, they accepted Hitler's demand to join the government only if he became
Chancellor. Since the government was a coalition consisting of two Nazis and nine
conservatives, they reasoned that Hitler could be used and controlled. And so, on January
30th, 1933, Hitler legally became the Chancellor of Germany.

Hitler moved quickly to establish a dictatorship. He used terror to gain power while
maintaining an air of legality throughout. He called for new elections to Parliament and
then had the Parliament building burned to the ground.
He blamed the Communists for this act thus helping to get them out of the way and out of
any possible public following. He convinced President Hindenburg to sign an emergency act
that [1] abolished the freedom of speech and [2] abolished the freedom of assembly. On
March 23, 1933, the Nazis pushed the Enabling Act
through Parliament, thus making Hitler dictator for a period of four years. Communist
Party members were arrested, the Catholic Center Party withdrew all opposition and the
Social Democratic Party was dissolved. So it was that Germany, like Soviet Russia under
Stalin, became a one party State.

In the economic sphere, all strikes were made illegal and unions were abolished. The
members of professional organizations such as doctors, lawyers, professors and engineers
were swallowed up in Nazi-based organizations. In the cultural sphere, the press now feel
under total state control. Blacklisting became the rule, books were burned, modern art was
prohibited and anti-intellectualism became the rule of the day.

Hitler promised the German people work and bread and he delivered both. As most shrewd
politicians are capable, Hitler gave the people what they wanted the most. He launched a
massive public works program to pull Germany out of the Depression. Superhighways, office
buildings, huge stadiums and public buildings were constructed at a rapid pace. By 1936,
however, government spending was now being directed almost entirely to the military,
necessary for the coming war Hitler had already specified in Mein Kampf. Meanwhile,
unemployment dropped steadily. In January 1937, unemployment stood at 7 million. Twelve
months later it had fallen to 1 million and by 1938, Germany witnessed a shortage of
labor. The standard of living increased by 20% and business profits were finally
increasing.

What all this recovery showed was that Hitler was more than show -- he was no Mussolini
who made the trains run on time. No, Hitler had accomplished something for Germany and the
German people. For those Germans who were not Jews, Slavs, Gypsies or communists,
liberals, non-Germans, or insane or weak, Hitler's government meant greater opportunity
and greater equality. Older class barriers were replaced by individuals who, like Hitler,
were rootless and had risen to the top. The Nazis tolerated privilege and wealth, but only
when it served the Party. Big business was constantly ordered around thus making, once
again, the invisible hand of Adam Smith, a thing of the past. Of course, you can identify
a similar tendency in the United States with the New Deal and Stalin's Five Year Plans in
Soviet Russia. Planning was, in other words, essential.

Although economic recovery and increased opportunity won Hitler support, Nazism was
totally guided by two main ideas: Lebensraum and race. As Germany regained economic
strength and built up its military, Hitler formed alliances with other dictators and began
to expand. Meanwhile, western Europe simply sat back and tried to appease Hitler in order
to avoid another World War.

War did break out in 1939 for one specific reason -- Hitler's ambitions were without
limit. The Nazi armies scored impressive victories until late in 1942. Hitler's aggression
was so strong that a mighty coalition of nations was needed to destroy his growing empire.
By the summer of 1943, the tide had turned and two years later, Germany lay in ruins,
utterly defeated. The one thousand year Reich was decidedly short-lived.

The Second World War marked the climax of the Age of Anxiety. Stalin's Russia and
Hitler's Germany rejected all liberal ideas. They tried to subordinate everything to the
State. Basic human rights were subjected to brutality and to terror. Whereas Stalin,
however, was content to extend his control over the Soviet Union, it was Hitler who aimed
at unlimited territorial and racial aggression of a master race. Hitler made war
inevitable: first with France, then with Britain and Russia and ultimately with the United
States.