Behind vapid bumper sticker slogans like “safe, legal, and rare,” this is the mentality of pro-abortion moonbats:

If their point of view can be mainstreamed, there is no reason the Holocaust couldn’t happen in America. The justification these fiends give for killing babies would apply just as readily to the elderly, the disabled, or any other group of people deemed to be inconvenient.

A sizeable percentage of the population either lacks the moral depth to distinguish between good and evil, or — in the case of the more avid abortion advocates — deliberately sides with the latter.

Blouts says: The justification these fiends give for killing babies would apply just as readily to the elderly, the disabled, or any other group of people deemed to be inconvenient.

In the debate tonight:

What do you tell a guy who is sick, goes into a coma and doesn’t have health insurance? Who pays for his coverage? “Are you saying society should just let him die?” Wolf Blitzer asked.

“Yeah!” several members of the (Republican) crowd yelled out.

Festivus

Did you watch the debate, lao?

Michelle

Can it commie… Your pitiful moroal equivalence begining with a false premise dont work here!

On to the topic….

PP: “get the church out of my life and get the feds in it.”

So you morons admit then that you are to lazy to pay for abortion yourself, to dumb to manage your own reproduction, and hate religion all in one sentence??

Brillinat…

ant

I love the confusion exhibited by the last guy, “Well, they don’t want to raise the kids, but they’re…about the rights for kids..” So, he apparently is concerned for the welfare of children and their rights…but..they must be a certain age, I guess. Well, I suppose when it’s in the womb you never can say it’s a human kid, I mean, all those mothers that deliver lizards,or houseplants, or Ipods. Those cells can grow into anything according to their ‘logic’..I heard one of these college-educated lefties try to explain X and Y chromosomes once, she got it completely, horribly wrong…and yet, the left calls us haters-of-science. Seems like the man in the video almost stumbled over his own ideological hole. Heck, he’s probably just trying to get laid by these ’empowered’ slut-walkers.

Why “rare”? Can someone explain why they tack that one on? If it’s safe and it’s legal, then what do they care if it’s rare? In their world it’s just someone’s choice, so who are they to tell someone that their choices should be rare?

It’s pretty disingenuous.

Festivus

lao, the reason I ask if you actually watched the debate is that post of yours was copied and pasted from HuffPo.

Did you watch the debate and surmize that all on your own or did you just copy and paste it from HuffPo without any personal knowledge of what happened?

RKae

Pro-Lifers don’t care about the baby after it’s born? (So claims the jerk in the video.)

I have a dream. Someday, after Jesus has come back to earth to rule and reign, there is going to be an epic movie made. It will be like the Ten Commandments, with very Godly people and very evil people. Imagine such characters as Obama, Rahm Emanual, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Al Gore, etc. and people like those in the video above, all portrayed on the big screen. This is what we are living through and our children and grandchildren will be able to see how it was for us.

Sweet dreams!

hiram

I liked the brainiac at the end with the pink hair. “If I get pregnant tomorrow…”

Honey, I know for a fact that you knew how to use a condom by the time you left 4th grade. That kind of stuff has been S.O.P. for our pubic… er, I mean public schools since *I* was in 4th grade back in 1976. You KNOW what makes babies… hell, if you went to school in a liberal district, you might have gotten those ‘fisting’ classes. Anyway, you know where babies come from, you know where STD’s come from, and unwanted versions of either are 100% preventable.

That’s the time you make your “choice”, dear. Not after the fact, when it becomes WAAAAY more complicated, physically, morally, and (maybe not for your kind) spiritually.

Festivus

lao must’ve wandered off to bed.

Michelle

C’mon Fetivus…. You know lao the stupid had to run off and get his responses programed by his owners.

He will be back just as soon as he finds out who will be thinking for him…..

scientia destruetur

This kind of “thinking” is not possible without brainwashing. The normal human mind cannot accept such ideas unless it has been bathed in propaganda and fed abnormal notions rights and liberty. This typifies Leftist thinking on all their pet issues: They’ve got legal abortion and they want what? They’ve got gov’t funding for abortion and they want what? They’ve got PP in every city and they want what? They want MORE. Evil is never satisfied.

gurahamu

The “rare” thing they tack on to make their position seem more appealing to those who have actually have some moral sense. You’re right: it is utterly disingenuous.

The fact is, there is no elective abortion they have a problem with. If they want less abortions it’s like anyone wanting less heart bypass surgeries: it would of course be nice if there were less but everyone knows it’s good that they are performed. Obviously, they want as many abortions performed as are needed. And if the abortion rate skyrocketed as a result of legalisation then that’s fine with them: it just shows how much of a need existed for it all along.

They lie. They are disingenuous, naturally. Because that’s nothing if you believe killing the unborn is a moral good.

SPURWING PLOVER

Organized gang of babykillers backed by a murderer in the whitehouse

Oiao

Obummer would say obort Juce Babies first!!!

Jodie

It’s MY body and My body is sick of working to pay for your damn abortions!

Sexy Snake-Eyes

Yaknow what? Maybe Godless people really should off themselves and their own ‘chirrens’.

I can’t believe I even typed that, but, I’m so disgusted by the creepy ‘abortion as birth control’ cult of the current whackadoodles who call themselves ‘progressives’ without even knowing who Margaret Sanger was and what she ‘stood’ for.

Marci

So, if they get pregnant tomorrow, they want an abortion immediately? Note they don’t say they cannot have one now—-the issue is they want the TAXPAYER to fund it. I myself am happy for these creatures not to procreate, but they are going to have to deal with the consequences of their sex with their OWN money.

Jimbo

Liberals are murderers, plain and simple.
Sterilize them.

Sexy Snake-Eyes

Marci says: September 12, 2011 at 11:44 pm

So, if they get pregnant tomorrow, they want an abortion immediately? Note they don’t say they cannot have one now—-the issue is they want the TAXPAYER to fund it. I myself am happy for these creatures not to procreate, but they are going to have to deal with the consequences of their sex with their OWN money.

First they murder the unborn, next they start euthanasia and then they bring you genocide.

Same happened in National socialist Germany, and in a sense you could call Babykiller Barack a national socialist.

Planned Parenthood especially targes black people as they see them as subhuman, the whore Margaret Sanger that started the racist Planned Parenthood, really really really hated black people http://blackgenocide.org/, just like the racist democrat party hates black people (a.k.a. the kkk party): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xryXpK042pQ

Sexy Snake-Eyes

Anti socialist says: September 13, 2011 at 12:20 am

You nailed it, kiddo.

The “undesirables” were purposely targeted for abortion.

Who were the “undesirables”?…

The very people that the Demoncrats ‘supposedly’ and laughably ‘care’ about:

If abortion is soooooo great and enlightening, why the suicide/massive depression rate of participants?

Why does abortion “procedures” (murder) never get televised, like every other “surgery”?

Why do 95% of MD’s refuse to perform them?

How does a dead thing grow into a child we won’t raise?

Carmen

Hussein voted TWICE for full term infanticide. This is evil in its purest, open forum, form. He had no bones about it – Babies are punishments to be scraped out and thrown in the trash bin out back. Please, enlightened liberals, please off yourself to save GAIA.

A co -worker said he would be happy to have his daughters have abortions if inconvenient to their futures. I asked : these are YOUR grandchildren!! He looked at me and said “you people – Boooosh caused 9/11!! I kid u not.

Sinister66

Quick question.
How do you target someone for abortion when its totally voluntary?You sound like they are forcing people to have abortions.
Or do you mean abortion is more easily accessible to the “undesirables”.

Libra

I’m either in love with the pink hair or the one with the ring in her nose.

StanInTexas

Sinister,

You locate abortion mills in areas where the “undesirables” live. You advertise that service as easy (or in many cases free). You councel women that come to the clinic to have abortions and deliberately NOT tell them about the risks or alternatives.

And you do your level best to dehumanize the child growing in side of them, while telling them it’s their body and they can do whatever they want with it, including getting pregnant again so that they can come back to the clinic for another “procedure”!

oldguy

And the doctors wonder why they are not held in such high regard anymore.

http://kurlander.blogspot.com GoY

The myth that “No one on the left is pro-abortion” takes another body blow.

Goldenfoxx

Think about this. Looking at all those morons and their liberals point of view, do we really want them bringing children into this world? That one gal mentioned that she would get an abortion because she needed a job to pay for all the school loans. Well then, I advise her to keep her legs together and not get pregnant. As a taxpayer, I don’t want to pay for their mistakes.

StanInTexas

Goy,

That lie is killed every time a person that is pro-life is nominated for a position on the Federal Court.

The common denominator of all the video participants is their age – under 30 – most likely college students or recent graduates.

Doesn’t this speak volumes about the college system in this country?

Too many people are afraid to speak out against the colleges and universities, lest they be thought of as “anti-education”. Well, from where I sit, there’s damn little education taking place in the institutions of higher learning but there’s plenty of indoctrination.

I hope one day I get an opportunity to be at a rally such as this and ask some of these geniuses if they know who Margaret Sanger is, and what is her background. Guaranteed none will know who she is. I’m not sure it would make any difference to these skulls full of mush, since they’ve already swallowed the kool-aid of liberalism and feminism.

JamesJ

50 million abortions is not “rare”

StanInTexas

Taz, I’m sure they know who Sanger is, and they will tell you, in lofty and flowery language,all of the good and worhwhile things she advocated. They will tell you she is a saint and a hero to women of all colors.

And if you make any attempt to educate them on Sanger’s core beliefs or to use Sanger’s own words and writings to prove your point, these same paragons of virtue and tolerance will scream at you and most likely physically attack you for having the temerity to speak ill of such a champion for women.

You are correct, it will make no difference. Believe me, I have tried.

RICH

SLUTS

(or as Chris Rock would say…)

“I love going to abortion rallies, cuz you know the women there are f#$cking. You ain’t gonna find any virgins at an abortion rally. You might even see some clear heels.”

lao

Michelle, (no surprise), fails to see that Blount made the “topic” far more than abortion with this line:

The justification these fiends give for killing babies would apply just as readily to the elderly, the disabled, or any other group of people deemed to be inconvenient.

I simply noted that some in the Tea Party audience at the Republican debate thought that the appropriate response to a hypothetical sick guy without health insurance was to let him die. Here’s the video clip.

Would you say this demonstrates that there are some “fiends” on the Tea Party side willing to see “inconvenient” groups of people die?

StanInTexas

Be gone, Groupie. We are tired of your insipid little dance.

http://kurlander.blogspot.com GoY

Actually, it indicates that the Tea Party believes in personal responsibility… which is anathema to progressives.

Sinister66

Lao

Wow. Didnt catch that before. That should be a topic on here.

lao

How hardline are you on “personal responsibility” Yardsale?

If the hypothetical guy was your next door neighbor what would you do?

http://kurlander.blogspot.com GoY

I would not demand that the Government confiscate the paychecks and savings of everyone in the neighborhood to pay for his treatment.

StanInTexas

GoY, I have not been able to view the video yet, but I have read two separate accounts that say it was ONE PERSON that yelled out.

Typical of Liberals to tar the entire Right over the comments of a single person.

Sinister66

Stan
That still leaves the choice to the individual having the abortion. This whole notion that abortion will lead to genocide is ignorant. Basically its like saing the “undesirables” are so stupid they will abort themselves into extinction.

I am pro-choice. I had to talk 3 previous girlfriends into having abortions when I was younger and almost a fourth(thank you RU-486). Wacko broads said they were on birth control and werent.

Sinister66

GoY
Dont be a pussy dancing around for an acceptable answer.
I personally would let him die.

http://kurlander.blogspot.com GoY

Stan, it was bad form, but at least it once again exposes the shallowness, narcissism, and utter selfishness of liberal thinking as exemplified by our favorite addle-pated Canadian lackwit, who apparently defines his own depth of compassion by his willingness to have the Government confiscate other people’s money to pay the health care costs of those who had the means to purchases insurance, but who chose not to.

StanInTexas

Sinister, it takes away the choice of the child that was conceived because whores like you continue to have unprotected sex with women.

You kill children as a means of your own birth control. You therefore have no place in this discussion until you are able to practice some personal responsibility.

lao

Poor stanwee, unable to click a provided video link and hear for himself.

StanInTexas

I told you GROUPIE, that your idiotic dance was boring us.

GO AWAY!

Festivus

It’s sort of a phony question to begin with (Blitzer’s) and the individual in the crowd may not have appreciated the subtle twist in the question that Blitzer made at the end.

The issue raised was not about letting this hypothetical person die or not. The question was who is going to pay for the treatment? But Blitzer twisted it at the end.

I don’t think it is lawful to allow such a person to die under those hypothetical circumstances. The question was specious.

As to whether that person in the audience actually intended to let the person die under those circumstances (because the person couldn’t pay for it), it is impossible to say. There are some hard core libertarians out there that would probably agree with that, I suppose.

But the whole crux of the exchange was about who is going to pay for the care. There was a presumption that the care would be provided no mattter what (until the very end of the exchange, that is).

Those people in the audience adamantly believe that people ought not expect the taxpayers to foot the bill for the poor choices of others. That is the essence of what they are reacting to. Should they compromise this principle (that I would venture to say most Americans agree with) given a hypothetical question? Certainly not.

Calling them “fiends” is something of a simplistic view of the exchange and smacks of political opportunism for what amounts to a spontaneous reaction to a question that was complicated by subtly twisting it at the end.

Your comment demonstrated your own utter ignorance. Rather than go to the actual source and make up your own mind you grab talking points read elsewhere, then make this gem of a whine:

Typical of Liberals to tar the entire Right over the comments of a single person.

No stanwee, typical of right wing flakes to AVOID facts and make up their own.

If you paid attention you might have noticed I didn’t “tar the entire Right” I said

…I simply noted that some in the Tea Party audience…

Would you say this demonstrates that there are some “fiends” on the Tea Party side…

lao

Festivus, the word “fiends” was in quotation marks because Blount used it in his Holocaust in America fantasy.

StanInTexas

Groupie, you said SOME. There was ONE, just one.

So once again, you lied. Imagine my surprise.

Now do as you’re told and GO AWAY!

http://kurlander.blogspot.com GoY

An ER nurse once told me that 80% of the people who go to the Emergency Room don’t need to be there. If the Government had a catastrophic care program that covered the treatment of seriously ill people (and required them to pay it back), we could afford to cover them and we would bring the total cost of health care down.

But, back in the eighties, a bunch of pseudo-compassionate “force somebody else to pay for it” liberals decided to use the Government to force hospitals to treat everybody who showed up at the Emergency Room for any reason and eat the cost. So, naturally, welfare parasites began showing up at the emergency room every time they had a sniffle or a hangnail. Because, hey, it’s “free.” And being on welfare, it’s not like they’re going to miss any work hanging around in the Emergency Room. And don’t you dare tell them to go home, unless you want a lawsuit, buddy.

http://kurlander.blogspot.com GoY

The root cause of the problem is the misguided liberal belief that it’s wrong for health care to be a profitable industry. That’s retarded. If we want good health, then health care should be enormously profitable! Profitable industries attract investment and competition. A profitable industry draws the brightest and most most ambitious people to it. Profit + ambition breeds innovation. Innovation + competition lowers costs and improves care.

The leftist drive to make medicine unprofitable and run by bureaucrats means that instead of bright, ambitious, innovators… you get an industry run by bureaucrats and people who couldn’t get more lucrative jobs elsewhere. An industry in which innovation and competition are stifled, and costs rise in proportion to people’s indifference (since costs are borne by others).

Now, perhaps we may get back to the topic of baby-killing, and the boundless enthusiasm of the left to kill as many babies as possible.

Sinister66

Stan
you probably dont know this but men only have one form of birth control while women have 13. In order to have the best protection both should be using birth control. If the female says she is but actually isnt then you dont have 100% coverage. The abortion were all done within 6 weeks so technically not children.
And your holier then though attitude is laughable.

StanInTexas

GoY, I think it is even simpler. Liberals believe that health insurance and health care are RIGHTS that they deserve to have. They should get the best care and NEVER have to pay for it.

As for the ghouls of the child-death industry, I remember a quote from President Ronald Reagan. “I notice that everyone that is for abortion has already been born.“

StanInTexas

Sinister,

They were children, complete with life and their own DNA. Trying to dehumanize them only makes you more pathetic.

And by your own admission, you didn’t even TRY to prevent the pregnancies, either by using your own birth control or by NOT HAVING SEX!

TECHNICALLY, I doubt you are even capable of being responsible. Sad that others have to die for your irresponsibility!

lao

stanwee, LISTEN to the video instead of basing your stupidity on what others have told you.

Sinister66

Stan
there were a few guy and a few women. Turn your speakers up.

StanInTexas

Dance in the traffic, GROUPIE!

StanInTexas

Dear Impotent Trolls,

The topic of this thread is Abortion, NOT the GOP Debate.

I invite the owner of this site to delete any off-topic posts, including mine!

Sinister66

StanInTexas says: September 13, 2011 at 9:36 am

If you would read what I said again, I never mentioned if I was or wasnt using birth control.
As for not having sex, well thats just stupid.

So you are saying you WERE using your ONE form of birth control and you got FOUR WOMEN pregnant anyway.

Are you proud to be that big of an idiot?

lao

stanwee, the “topic” is broader than abortion.

As I have repeatedly pointed out, Blount wrote this:

If their point of view can be mainstreamed, there is no reason the Holocaust couldn’t happen in America. The justification these fiends give for killing babies would apply just as readily to the elderly, the disabled, or any other group of people deemed to be inconvenient.

StanInTexas

Groupie, you are again off-topic.

Blount’s statement is absolutely true of the abortion crowd and has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the GOP Debate.

lao

stanwee, the right loves to vent their fantasyland hyperbole re supposed threats from the left regarding an American Holocaust and Blount is making that claim, (again) in the words I quoted.

I simply provided a link to demonstrate that some on the right certainly do not stand on the moral high ground.

Of course we can always rely on our Moonbattery parrots to demonstrate that even more graphically:

Sexy Snake-Eyes says:
September 12, 2011 at 11:32 pmYes, you are a digressive who calls their own special self a “progressive”. Wahhhhhhhh. You commie nutbag POS. You don’t deserve to lick the dirt off of my heels after I finish forcing you to dig the graves of your brethren.

Sinister66

StanInTexas says: September 13, 2011 at 9:46 am
You do know condoms arent 100% effective right. Or do you live under a rock.

StanInTexas

Sinister,

Stop trying to justify your irresponsibiliy. You had unprotected sex with multiple women. Four got pregnant. You blamed them for the pregnancy and them talked them into killing the children that you produced.

You and your lack of responsibility sickens me.

StanInTexas

There is no one lower on this planet than the person that harms and kills children. The Right doesn’t need to stand on any high ground, when the Left spends all their time wallowing in the sewer of their own making.

Abortion supporters will be judged for their hate!

Anti socialist

james says:
September 13, 2011 at 7:34 am
“Strange, how the largest, but not the only group targeted in the Holocaust is now the biggest supporter of infanticide.”

or them just being plain evil, some ofcourse blamed God for what happened, if they had read ALL of Deuteronomy 28 they know why it happened.

White Falcon 1

Not one of them even came close to the common sense solution…Keep your skanking fly traps closed and the issue becomes moot!!! 1/2 of those things are wearing vibrators out…no way their getting laid as nasty as they are, anyway!

Seriously…I understand the need and drive of human sexuality…but how can I trust YOU with the choice when YOUVE shown absolutely NO concern for YOUR OWN body or the results of sexual activity!!! The word “no” exists for a reason…attach it to “its thta time of the month and you have the entire other 3 weeks to play whore with….nasty things!!!

FreedomFox

As has been clearly demonstrated, for most pro-abortion people the issue is less about eugenics and more about being able to screw whoever they want with no consequences (ignoring the obvious risk of STDs that such behavior carries).

Talking four different “girlfriends” into having an abortion? By God, have you never heard of monogamy?

If you absolutely insist on screwing everything that moves and not having to raise a child, might I suggest surgery? Snip snip, no kids for you! I wouldn’t even mind you putting that on insurance, since surely a single sterilization procedure would cost less than all the abortions your irresponsible behavior would inevitably result in.

SNuss

I propose government-funded tubal ligation or vasectomies for all Liberals. They can then screw each others’ tiny brains out, without any worries of pregnancies. After a few decades, Leftist Liberalism should become extinct. Sounds like a win-win situation to me.

Sinister66

FreedomFox
Read and comprehend.
I said when I was younger. I have kids now. Only because I decided when I would have them and with who. Nobody was going to make that choice for me.

StanInTexas

Sinister,

YOU made that choice, when you chose to have unprotected sex with multiple women. The only ones who did not get a choice were the children who you talked the women into killing.

Do your chuildren know about all of their brothers and sisters that you killed?

Still trying to justify your abject irresponsibility? Pathetic!

John Lewis

I used to think that Planned Parenthood just provided information on – planning a family. It never crossed my mind that they would become abortion advocates and providers.

For those in the demonstration, however, spaying for the females and gelding for the males is probably a good idea. Go for it!!!

Sinister66

Stan

Now your just being an stupid. I said protection on my part was used.
And if I had to do it all over again I wouldnt change anything.

StanInTexas

So first you said that it was the women’s fault (“Wacko broads said they were on birth control and werent“), now you claim you were using protection?

Sinsiter, if you were using protection and STILL got four women pregnant, then you are far too STUPID to be having sex. And I have no doubt woudl would continue to have unprotected sex with whoever would spread their legs for you and then demand they kill the child that resulted from your stupidity.

I feel sorry for your children. Do they know what an irresponsible and idiotic father they have?

FreedomFox

And yet the fact remains: you screwed at least five different women (counting your current wife), got four of them pregnant, talked three into abortions and ditched them, and only didn’t do the same for the fourth because it was a false alarm. Fortunate for your wife that you finally managed to man up and settle down, though I hope for both your sakes that you are committed to her, marriages don’t tend to last long if one or both partners are promiscuous, even supposedly “open” relationships.

Do you know what the responsible, moral response to “honey, I’m pregnant” is? It’s “Time for me to man up and be a father”, not “You psycho whore why weren’t you on pills? Kill that thing!”

Of course, another large part of responsibility is not having sex until a child is acceptable or desired. After all, that’s what it does. Do you put food in your oven and expect it to come out raw? Do you put wood under a saw and expect it to not be cut? Why then are you surprised when sex does exactly what it was designed to do?

Turbo

Incredible.

If they’re so morally bankrupt as to want to kill their own unborn child, that’s bad enough obviously. But don’t also expect me to pay for it. They’re “entitled”. Pay for it yourself, wingnuts. Just incredible.

lvb-rocks

There certainly is a disconnect in Pro-Life proponents who also advocate contraception. Reading the insanity in this thread should make that obvious, yet, the disconnect remains. Birth control causes abortion. The wide, societal acceptance of birth control had to be in place before abortion could be widely accepted and ultimately legalized. No one knew that better than Margaret Sanger and her deranged ilk. Pro-Life proponents who advocate contraception have fallen right into the pro-abort agenda. They are only slightly less self-deluded than the militant pro-abortion youngsters in this video.

Think through what has happened since ‘reliable’ contraception was introduced in the ’20s, through the sexual revolution in the ’60s, and to today. In addition to the obvious general lowering of morality, the rates of conjugal infidelity, divorce, family breakdown, wife and child abuse, venereal diseases, out-of-wedlock births, and female exploitation have all massively increased. It has also placed a dangerous weapon in the hands of public authorities to impose population control policies, including exporting sterilization and abortion into developing countries. Ultimately, a contraception mentality misleads human beings into a false freedom, and it is primarily responsible for the real increase in our own dehumanization. This thread shows how men become slaves to contraceptive tools, and the woman become the object of the very tools she believes ensures her ‘liberation.’

Elevate your thinking. Birth control (a true euphemism) is evil. The sexual revolution is over. The worst kind of men won. Good men have fallen for the ruse. Women have paid a high price, enslaved to a life of grief and guilt. Society has paid a high price by losing its moral compass. And the highest price of all is paid by the innocents who are sacrificed every minute in the name of “progress.”

RICH

Maybe Sinister’s dick was too small and the condom wasn’t tight enough to hold his semen, or it slipped off and ended up inside of his mate?

Poor little guy. Other than standing up and being a real man, he had no other choice but to advocate for legal murder</b.

Sinister66 + sexual education + abortion = Failure of a man.

Hey guy… acknowledge your failure, and next time, when in doubt, pull it out.

Delia

lvb-rocks says: September 13, 2011 at 2:08 pm

Real ‘birth control’ means shoving your penis back in your pants, closing your legs and realizing that ‘sex’ is really not ‘all that’. What REALLY should be taught in schools is that masturbation is normal, natural and much better birth-control. If people learn to pleasure themselves, they will soon find out that ‘sex’ really isn’t better [probably much LESS so for women].

Once women find out that ‘sex’ with a man is pretty much a joke and the only reason she should be ‘going there’ is if she is in a committed relationship and if she wants children. Otherwise, ‘sex’ for the average woman is a big, fat JOKE.

A glimmer of hope? There is none. Why? Because most people with brains have fewer children and people with lower i.q.s f*ck like rabid monkeys.

Remember the movie ‘Idiocracy’ anyone, Beueller? Writ large is our current constituency.

Is it too late to stop the madness?

Probably.

Stupid is incurable

Sinister66

Its a good thing you people don’t have sex. Anyone with half a brain in their head know condoms aren’t 100% effective as I have also stated in previous posts. Everything you people said is just childish and flat out crazy.

Delia, you sound a bit bitter

The whole ” you should only have sex with one person” may work for you people but not me. If it did I would still be with the first girl I slept with in ninth grade and would have missed out on the loving from the other dozen that same year.

Antisocialist

FreedomFox says:
September 13, 2011 at 11:06 am
“As has been clearly demonstrated, for most pro-abortion people the issue is less about eugenics and more about being able to screw whoever they want with no consequences (ignoring the obvious risk of STDs that such behavior carries). ”

Yes but the people that want to genocide use these people for their genocidal purposes, they’ve been played hard, but that’s what happens when they think with their little Chuckles Johnson and not their bigger Chuckles Johnson.

It’s a curse that keeps on giving.

FreedomFox

“The whole ‘you should only have sex with one person’ may work for you people but not me.”–Sinister66 September 13, 2011 at 5:50 pm

Gentlemen, QED. By the way, I’d like to hear how you explain that to the wife you claim to have. “Well, there was just the secretary… the lady from the gym, the pizza girl, the lifeguard… oh, and Ms. Jones down the street. Did I mention that monogamy is overrated, honey?”