Response Dynamics has made diagnostic testing our core focus for over 30 years. We do this work well because we enjoy and are well grounded in basic physics and have particular expertise in structural dynamics and how it relates to vibration and acoustic noise issues on a myriad of levels.

We know instrumentation, digital signal processing, and spectral analysis, and use our specialized skill set, and vast array of instrumentation that we have collected for over 3 decades, to design tests and solve tricky problems. Examples include: nanometer disturbances in interferometers, thermal and acoustic issues in military control hardware, magnetic/acoustic/vibration issues in scanning electron microscopes, turbine isolation issues in hundred megawatt power plants, optics vibration and servo control issues in sub-micron genomics microscopes and diagnostic testing of mountain top telescopes, to name a few.

We most often characterize a problem first and work from known conditions, and stay in “the known” as we proceed by making sense of what we observe as we move forward. We test and analyze the change in dynamics we are trying to create in real-time, on site, and often make changes to our experimental test plan on the fly as we discover how a system is actually behaving. In doing so we often get meaningful results from which we can make sound engineering decisions in a short time frame. We don't just make measurements and spit out data. We help identify the problem and propose solutions.

Key concepts common in diagnostic testing:

Multi-variable testing is usually necessary to really get a handle on an issue involving multiple disciplines of physics.

Measurement of multiple variables requires an understanding of the physics of the coupling between them as well as the physics and limitations of the instrumentation.

We use our testing expertise, as well as various methods of analytic, computer simulation, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) , and numerical analysis (often for non-linear systems), to make sense of the system problems so that we will have confidence that our understanding is indeed correct (or sufficiently correct). We always strive prove a hypothesis using more than one testing and analysis method. We also make an effort to know what we don't know by considering measurement error, instrumentation noise, resolution limitations, and non-linear behaviors.

The nuts and bolts of knowing good data from badbrings indispensable value to our analyses.

We very often get our hands dirty and build proof-of-concept “fixes” on site, or back in our shop, to quickly test a “design-fix” concept. We do this prototype testing carefully, with 30 years of structural dynamics experience, always working hard to test and keep an accurate understanding of the current system dynamics and the boundary conditions as we make changes. However, as so often happens to our clients, when quick and dirty fixes are attempted by other engineers with little structural dynamics experience, confusion, delay, and uncertainty regarding the design of the experiment often result. A faulty test often leads to the wrong conclusion and drives the wrong action. Valuable development time is often wasted, and the issue soon becomes an emergency. See our discussion on Product Emergency.

We have the experience to quickly analyze past test methodologies and explain for the team what has been done well, and what needs improving, tweaking, or additional attention to a particular dynamic parameter. This is important for getting an engineering team all on the same page by making sure everyone understands the problem, what has been done, and how to move forward. These unique abilities have brought us long lasting working relationships with the majority of our clients.