10) If you draw two circles, one inside, and one outside the base of the Great Pyramid. If you subtract the length of the inside circle from the
length of the outside circle, you get the Speed of Light at 299,792458, this is the number in the pyramid: 299,79

I watched the first half of the full length video, didn't much like the documentary style or the tone. Reminds me of why I never watch this kind of
thing.

But data is data, and they do have some interesting observations. I like the fact you saw the speed of light thing must be important here. I am
starting to agree with this. I did a search for "speed of light" and "great pyramid" and got this video. I think this is absolutely crazy:

hmmmm... I wonder if we make the number of internet hits equal the numerical value for the speed of light if we can then break the speed of light...
j/k , I just noticed the numbers were getting really close and my imagination ran away with me

I encourage others to confirm or disprove the points this documentary brought up instead of simply taking a side or casting serious doubt.

It's clear that the Great Pyramid is a structure that has many secrets encoded into it, depicting a story of skill and knowledge that intimidates and
gives modern architecture a run for it's money. I suggest people look into the King's chamber and how precise the blocks are in that chamber in
particular. It's absolutely amazing.

I visited the pyramids in January and worked with many Egyptians when in Egypt and we discussed the pyramids, let me assure you, all the Egyptians i
spoke to believe it was aliens/gods that built them. None of them believe it was the Egyptians. If you have seen them in real life you will
understand this next sentence....

Trying to force a thread to take one life or another is futile especially on ATS. Save your worry hairs for something more important.

As to your documentary, there are dozens of ATS threads with links to more scientifically, philosophically and creatively performed reviews and
analysis. Personally, my "Giza" folder is 20g of data of which there is agreement, disagreement and quasi-agreements. I have a library of Farrell,
Childress, Barsoum, Houdin/Dassault, Brown, Paganini, Gabriel, Gigal, blah blah ...maps, books, presentations, pdf prints...

Point is, it is entertaining, amazing, confusing, debunked, disinfo-ed and extremely complex and no one holds the truth. We won't know until the
Builders whoever they are tell us.

Trying to force a thread to take one life or another is futile especially on ATS. Save your worry hairs for something more important.

As to your documentary, there are dozens of ATS threads with links to more scientifically, philosophically and creatively performed reviews and
analysis. Personally, my "Giza" folder is 20g of data of which there is agreement, disagreement and quasi-agreements. I have a library of Farrell,
Childress, Barsoum, Houdin/Dassault, Brown, Paganini, Gabriel, Gigal, blah blah ...maps, books, presentations, pdf prints...

Point is, it is entertaining, amazing, confusing, debunked, disinfo-ed and extremely complex and no one holds the truth. We won't know until the
Builders whoever they are tell us.

If they ever do.

As an expert archiver of information, what do you think of the thing I posted up there about the Speed of Light ^? As far as I can see, it's only
ever been mentioned in a couple of threads here, and those are from the last 12 months or so. So that's a pretty new bit of info? That's an on topic
post too? Why the lack of interest?

speed of light = 299792458 metres per second.
Latitude on a part of the Great Pyramid @ Cairo: 29.9792458°N

As an expert archiver of information, what do you think of the thing I posted up there about the Speed of Light ^? As far as I can see, it's only
ever been mentioned in a couple of threads here, and those are from the last 12 months or so. So that's a pretty new bit of info? That's an on
topic post too? Why the lack of interest?

speed of light = 299792458 metres per second.
Latitude on a part of the Great Pyramid @ Cairo: 29.9792458°N

Old news.

Google "speed of light" great pyramid

I've seen this several times over a decade, it's a nice touch but the entire Giza Pyramid, special engineering, astrological, astronomical,
geological thing has been beat to death. As fun and striking as the subject is, we are at a point where there is little left but to rechew the same
food.

What people are trying to say in these videos is that they don't accept the conventional explanation of these things. My personal point of view is
modern history is not acknowledging the very strong possibility that there were civilisations that were pretty advanced on earth a long time (probably
thousands of years, perhaps tens) before the current taught history puts early civilizations of man.

So, for instance, all that might mean is that there were more advanced tools and knowledge available to the builders than the most basic inventory
allowed by current teaching. Imagine that, lied to again.

Hey, far be it from me to close any rabbit hole, I'm just telling you from experience that there is no end to this one. Enjoy the journey, that's
what life is about after all.

As an expert archiver of information, what do you think of the thing I posted up there about the Speed of Light ^? As far as I can see, it's only
ever been mentioned in a couple of threads here, and those are from the last 12 months or so. So that's a pretty new bit of info? That's an on
topic post too? Why the lack of interest?

speed of light = 299792458 metres per second.
Latitude on a part of the Great Pyramid @ Cairo: 29.9792458°N

Old news.

Google "speed of light" great pyramid

I've seen this several times over a decade, it's a nice touch but the entire Giza Pyramid, special engineering, astrological, astronomical,
geological thing has been beat to death. As fun and striking as the subject is, we are at a point where there is little left but to rechew the same
food.

What people are trying to say in these videos is that they don't accept the conventional explanation of these things. My personal point of view is
modern history is not acknowledging the very strong possibility that there were civilisations that were pretty advanced on earth a long time (probably
thousands of years, perhaps tens) before the current taught history puts early civilizations of man.

So, for instance, all that might mean is that there were more advanced tools and knowledge available to the builders than the most basic inventory
allowed by current teaching. Imagine that, lied to again.

Hey, far be it from me to close any rabbit hole, I'm just telling you from experience that there is no end to this one. Enjoy the journey, that's
what life is about after all.

I think that what is "old news" is fairly subjective and based on the individual since you do indeed have to dig until you reach a certain point
where the same things are brought up.

I agree with your stance that history has messed with, and that the majority of impressions based on text-book recounts and a professors opinion have
tainted the water.

I notice that people are reluctant, perhaps out of ego, but nonetheless, reluctant to tackle the larger implications of many of these things, and are
too quick to simply jump on the bandwagon that explains things in a more simple form, one that feels they should be able to grasp. I'm inclined,
based on reasoning to take the stance that the possibility of advanced and knowledgable civilizations of the past could be a reality, and the marks
left behind are all that stood the test of time, whilst every single other thing was destroyed.

We will however perhaps never know indeed, but things like the existence of the Great Pyramid which can be a stagnant and static thought, recurring
but outside the barrier of what's important, will always exist, and will always cause people to question everything they know, so long as facts seem
so twisted, spread out and ultimately avoided in the end. I guess what I'm trying to say is, who decides that facts are relevant and important, and
what should be important to the human race? It's always good to be aware of what is there.

I'm using the word fact loosely in a way, though what I've seen with my own eyes and what calculations I've made to confirm these things, have
turned out freakishly accurate.

Google "speed of light" great pyramid and if you had you would find this is old news and nothing subjective about it. That similarity has been
proposed and discussed for well more than a half-century.

I understand your need to argue this easily made point in the attempt to keep your thread - and ego -alive but the MOF is that, as I have said
twice before, now as succinct as I can, no one gives a sh$$. Old, new, revelatory (which it isn't), etc.

murkraz
This is a great thread thank you for posting it..The video was very good Ive never seen it before it was very intriguing with allot of good
points..Tomorrow I'm going to watch the rest of the videos anything on Egypt always captures my attention..peace,sugarcookie1 S&F

It's certainly an impressive monument but I think you have to be careful basing any theories off its dimensions and mass.
You mentioned it is earthquake proof but it was damaged by an earthquake sometime in the 300's AD and lost its outer limestone casing and capstone
(which were used to repair damaged buildings in Cairo) so any dimensions are estimates really.
As far as the number of blocks used and its mass have been reduced over the years as ground-penetrating radar surveys revealed many cavities which
iirc may be filled with some kind of refined sand - have to google that.
Certainly many mysteries about it remain though and as others have said this info has been debated for decades now - I think Peter Tompkins book
"Secrets of the Great Pyramid" published in 1971 (and is still available) may have been one of the first books to really popularise it.

Google "speed of light" great pyramid and if you had you would find this is old news and nothing subjective about it. That similarity has been
proposed and discussed for well more than a half-century.

I understand your need to argue this easily made point in the attempt to keep your thread - and ego -alive but the MOF is that, as I have said
twice before, now as succinct as I can, no one gives a sh$$. Old, new, revelatory (which it isn't), etc.

Move on.

edit on 21-5-2012 by AlchemicalMonocular because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-5-2012 by AlchemicalMonocular because:
(no reason given)

You're awfully quick to tell people what to do, and to speak for the output of the whole forum for someone who registered only this month.

I've gone through google books looking for ""speed of light" pyramid latitude" and I get less than 48 published results, fewer relevant ones. It
seems like Bruce Cathie was one of the first to write about this in the late 90s, and his observations have not travelled very far, and have mostly
been taken up by New Agers. Unless you have further sources?

The speed of light being written in the latitude of the Great Pyramid is a pretty remarkable fact, and this fact has received zero mainstream
attention. That is what this forum is for, remember? - discussing what is not mainstream? The discovery, as you said, has only been around for the
last 10 years or so. The pyramids are 4000 years old. How is that not new info? The availability of GPS and accurate satellite maps makes this the
first time in history that anyone can confirm these results easily. That's new too.

The enlightening part of studying these structures should not just be working out how they built it; I think everyone can gain something from
appreciating what they were trying to communicate. Perhaps you should spend some more time studying the constants of mathematics and physics, you
seem to have lost perspective of the wonder of those things?

Originally posted by murkraz
10) If you draw two circles, one inside, and one outside the base of the Great Pyramid. If you subtract the length of the inside circle from the
length of the outside circle, you get the Speed of Light at 299,792458, this is the number in the pyramid: 299,79

Yes, the speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second. This precise value is meaningless unless you're measuring the speed of light in
meters per second. Meaning, if the Egyptians had intentionally encoded this value as the speed of light, they would have to have somehow had our units
of meters and seconds.

Both of these units are totally arbitrary- not in any way constants of the universe, or chosen for mathematical reasons. Furthermore, as far as we can
tell, the Egyptians used neither, of course. They're modern inventions.

Secondly, they did not encode the speed of light in the pyramid's design, even if you do allow that they had meters and seconds. The
speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second. By your own admission, they encoded 29,979. This is a far cry from the speed of light- it's off by
four whole orders of magnitude!

Any scientist or engineer trying to get by with the speed of light as 29,979 meters per second would be hopelessly lost. This is laughable.

The speed of light is 163,928,509 fathoms per second. Change your unit, even a tiny bit, and the numbers change accordingly. I hope you see my point.
The meter was adopted as a unit of measurement in 1875.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.