Blog Archives

Lots of blog posts and discussion threads suggest piping the output of DBCC commands to a table for further processing. That’s a great idea, but, unfortunately, an irritatingly high number of those posts contains an inaccurate table definition for the command output.

The reason behind this widespread inaccuracy is twofold.

On one hand the output of many DBCC commands changed over time and versions of SQL Server, and a table that was the perfect fit for the command in SQL Server 2000 is not perfect any more. In this case, the blog/article/thread is simply old, but many people will keep referring to that source assuming that things did not change.

On the other hand, the output is not always documented in BOL, and people often have to guess the table definition based on the data returned by the command. I’ve been guilty of this myself and I’ve been corrected many times, until I decided that I needed a better way to discover the output definition.

You are a database professional and you don’t like to guess, because guessing is never as good as knowing it for sure.

In order to stop guessing, you will have to create a linked server named “loopback” that points back to the same instance where you are running the DBCC command.

I am sure you are asking yourself why you need such a strange thing as a loopback linked server. The idea behind is that you need a way to query the command as if it was a table or a view, so that it can be used as a valid source for a SELECT…INTO statement. The perfect tool for this kind of task is the OPENQUERY command, which allows sending pass-through queries, that don’t necessarily need to be SELECT statements. OPENQUERY requires a linked server, which can be any OLEDB data source, including a remote server or the same SQL Server instance where the linked server lies.

In order to capture the output of DBCC commands, you have to wrap them inside a stored procedure, otherwise SQL Server could complain about missing column information. I don’t know the exact technical reason behind this error (I suppose it has to do with the way metadata is propagated), but this limitation can be overcome wrapping the command into a stored procedure and using “SET FMTONLY OFF” in the pass-through query.

This is also a nice way to overcome the single INSERT…EXEC limit (and implement many more interesting tricks that I hope to cover in future posts).

For instance, to capture the table definition of DBCC LOGINFO(), you will have to create a stored procedure similar to this:

You could ask with good reason why you should use an output table when you could query the wrapper stored procedure directly with OPENQUERY. Based on observation, the trick does not always work and SQL Server can randomly complain about missing column information.

Msg 7357, Level 16, State 2, Line 2
Cannot process the object "loginfo". The OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI10" for linked server "LOOPBACK" indicates that either the object has no columns or the current user does not have permissions on that object.

Again, I don’t have an in-depth technical answer: I can only report what I observed. It’s not a big deal indeed, because the output definition changes very slowly (typically between SQL Server versions) and you probably would review your code anyway when upgrading to a newer version. I guess you can live with a hardcoded table definition when the price to pay for having it dynamic is a random failure.

This post showed you how to capture the output of DBCC LOGINFO, but the same technique can be used for all DBCC commands that allow specifying WITH TABLERESULTS, extended stored procedures, remote stored procedures and all those programmable objects than cannot be inspected easily.

Now that you have the right tool in your hands, do yourself a favour: stop guessing!