Thursday, April 2, 2015

So there's an occasional thing we like to do on Our Thoughts Precisely. We'll see a movie and then read the book after to see if there are any differences, if it's more detailed, and whatnot. All to see if we like the Movie, the Book, or Both.

Sophie has the great misfortune of being the eldest of three daughters, destined to fail miserably should she ever leave home to seek her fate. But when she unwittingly attracts the ire of the Witch of the Waste, Sophie finds herself under a horrid spell that transforms her into an old lady. Her only chance at breaking it lies in the ever-moving castle in the hills: the Wizard Howl's castle. To untangle the enchantment, Sophie must handle the heartless Howl, strike a bargain with a fire demon, and meet the Witch of the Waste head-on. Along the way, she discovers that there's far more to Howl—and herself—than first meets the eye...

I first learned about Howl’s Moving Castle when I saw the movie, and since then I’ve been curious about the book. So, recently I went out and purchased it. I can see the story and how it was adapted to the movie, but I also clearly saw the differences between the two. But that doesn’t mean that I didn’t enjoy the book. In fact, I have to say that I loved it. It was the kind of book that literally kept me up until three in the morning because I just had to finished it.

Going into this book I knew that there were going to be some differences, but I have to say that it didn’t bother me at all. The basic concept is about the same. The story follows Sophie Hatter after her unfortunate meeting with the Witch of the Waste and what happens after that. She runs into Calcifer, Howl, and Michael when she enters the castle uninvited. The novel certainly delved more into Howl's past, and what his family was like. The extra details were certainly a nice addition. Characters like Howl's apprentice, Michael, and Sophie's sisters—Lettie and Martha—played other roles in the book. I felt like they were more involved with parts of the story dedicated to exploring their personalities a little more. Some of the events were different and you really have to pay attention to what’s going on otherwise you might overlook it—I almost overlooked it, but thankfully I caught the details.

The setting was pretty similar to the movie, give or take a few details. The plot did have some major differences and I really enjoyed seeing how the story played out in the novel. Another aspect that I liked was the fact that a few details were given further explanationss, giving some clarity to their meaning. So while there were clear differences between the book and the movie, I loved both of them. Would I recommend the novel? Totally. And the Movie? Yep. This is the first in the trilogy and I have to say that I would definitely like to get the other two at some point in time, because I'm curious to see what happens to Sophie, Howl, and Calcifer after the end of Howl's Moving Castle.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

So there's an occasional thing we like to do on Our Thoughts Precisely. We'll go see a movie and then read the book after to see if there are any differences, if it's more detailed and whatnot. All to see if we like the Movie, the Book, or Both. So it's only fitting that we call it: Movie, Book, or Both? Now before I get to my thoughts on The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, take a look at the awesome trailer!

Thanks to 760 AM KFMB, I attended an Advanced Screening of The
Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. I usually like to indicate if I liked the movie,
book, or both. I haven’t read the book, so for now let me just say that The
Desolation of Smaug is one of my favorite movies of 2013.

Although, I enjoyed The Hobbit: An Unexpected
Journey. It was fairly slow paced and some of the scenes were drawn-out, so I
was unsure of what to expect from The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. Was it
slow paced? Absolutely not. The Desolation of Smaug was action packed early on.
The battle scenes were epic and somewhat
graphic with disturbing images as indicated in the movies ratings; yet,
skillfully depicted. I don’t usually
like to watch movies in 3D, but this was the perfect effect for this movie. I
can’t speak for anyone else, but I found myself jumping off the seat during a
couple of the unpredictable action sequences. The movie kept me glued to the
screen. I was so captivated by the movie that I lost track of time. And just
right smack at the height of the action, there’s a turning point—and then the
end that left me saying, “Noooooo, you just can’t end the movie like this. A
big cliffhanger??? Really???” Oh well, other than leaving me on the edge wanting
answers, The Desolation of Smaug is an awesome must see movie. *On a side note: Although I give all of the crew kudos, I should have known Guillermo del Toro had a hand in the creation of this movie because I loved it just as much as Pacific Rim, in which he was a director/producer/screenwriter.