Login

Current User Info

· Lurkers Lurking: 8

· Rebels Active: 0

· Total Rebels: 981· Newest Rebel: Greg Lawrence

Login Help

If you are having problems logging in, please bear in mind that if you originally registered at the site before 8th January 2014 and you haven't re-registered since that date your old login details will no longer work. If this is the case, please re-register, preferably with your former username. If you are having trouble with the registration process itself, try looking HERE and HERE for help and advice. If you need further assistance, please do CONTACT us.

Newest Articles

B7 Images

+ Cookies +

The Horizon website uses cookies to allow user log-in and navigation. The site does not host advertising that requires the use of third-party cookies. Registering as a member of this site implies your consent to the use of cookies.

Oh no! Orac wants to know - where's your JavaScript?!Your Web browser does not have JavaScript enabled or does not support JavaScript. Please enable JavaScript on your Web browser to properly view this Web site, or upgrade to a Web browser that does support JavaScript; Firefox, Safari, Opera, Chrome or a version of Internet Explorer newer then version 6.

Again the writer showed that he was unable to justify the plot in the dialogue; the Doctor did not even try to persuade Thous in episode two, and we get the same in episode three with starting the fish people revolution with any sort of actual argument being presented.

Reversing the polarity of the neutron flow. I bet that means something. It sounds great.

Again the writer showed that he was unable to justify the plot in the dialogue; the Doctor did not even try to persuade Thous in episode two, and we get the same in episode three with starting the fish people revolution with any sort of actual argument being presented.

It's a story with obvious weaknesses. I like it, simply because it's the earlier existing Troughton episodes, and he's wonderful from the off.

The central flaw in this whole story is that Atlantis is not submerged.

Aren't we a long way underwater, but there are barriers that stop the water coming in?

Defences which are sabotaged in Part 4.

True, but it's so obviously an 'underground city' in construction concept (like something out of an old Flash Gordon or Buck Rogers serial) and the island itself is still an island that the Atlanteans could build on any time they wished.

Isn't the island more of a single protruding rock?

But it still is not underwater; they can go to the surface and build on what there is; my point is that the writer created a story about an underground city not an underwater one, except in the city being below sea level.

Reversing the polarity of the neutron flow. I bet that means something. It sounds great.

Again the writer showed that he was unable to justify the plot in the dialogue; the Doctor did not even try to persuade Thous in episode two, and we get the same in episode three with starting the fish people revolution with any sort of actual argument being presented.

It's a story with obvious weaknesses. I like it, simply because it's the earlier existing Troughton episodes, and he's wonderful from the off.

The cast make more of the story on set than was there on paper, especially Troughton.

Reversing the polarity of the neutron flow. I bet that means something. It sounds great.

The central flaw in this whole story is that Atlantis is not submerged.

Aren't we a long way underwater, but there are barriers that stop the water coming in?

Defences which are sabotaged in Part 4.

True, but it's so obviously an 'underground city' in construction concept (like something out of an old Flash Gordon or Buck Rogers serial) and the island itself is still an island that the Atlanteans could build on any time they wished.

Isn't the island more of a single protruding rock?

But it still is not underwater; they can go to the surface and build on what there is; my point is that the writer created a story about an underground city not an underwater one, except in the city being below sea level.

The central flaw in this whole story is that Atlantis is not submerged.

Aren't we a long way underwater, but there are barriers that stop the water coming in?

Defences which are sabotaged in Part 4.

True, but it's so obviously an 'underground city' in construction concept (like something out of an old Flash Gordon or Buck Rogers serial) and the island itself is still an island that the Atlanteans could build on any time they wished.

Isn't the island more of a single protruding rock?

But it still is not underwater; they can go to the surface and build on what there is; my point is that the writer created a story about an underground city not an underwater one, except in the city being below sea level.

A complete underwater city is way beyond the budget of 1966

Not really! The most expensive part of filming was the location work; simply land the Tardis in a tunnel as normal and describe the city as underwater in the dialogue with airlocks etc and it would have been cheaper. I also draw your attention to the classic pre-Who serial City Beneath the Sea and its sequel Secret Beneath the Sea...

Reversing the polarity of the neutron flow. I bet that means something. It sounds great.

The central flaw in this whole story is that Atlantis is not submerged.

Aren't we a long way underwater, but there are barriers that stop the water coming in?

Defences which are sabotaged in Part 4.

True, but it's so obviously an 'underground city' in construction concept (like something out of an old Flash Gordon or Buck Rogers serial) and the island itself is still an island that the Atlanteans could build on any time they wished.

Isn't the island more of a single protruding rock?

But it still is not underwater; they can go to the surface and build on what there is; my point is that the writer created a story about an underground city not an underwater one, except in the city being below sea level.

A complete underwater city is way beyond the budget of 1966

Not really! The most expensive part of filming was the location work; simply land the Tardis in a tunnel as normal and describe the city as underwater in the dialogue with airlocks etc and it would have been cheaper. I also draw your attention to the classic pre-Who serial City Beneath the Sea and its sequel Secret Beneath the Sea...

The central flaw in this whole story is that Atlantis is not submerged.

Aren't we a long way underwater, but there are barriers that stop the water coming in?

Defences which are sabotaged in Part 4.

True, but it's so obviously an 'underground city' in construction concept (like something out of an old Flash Gordon or Buck Rogers serial) and the island itself is still an island that the Atlanteans could build on any time they wished.

Isn't the island more of a single protruding rock?

But it still is not underwater; they can go to the surface and build on what there is; my point is that the writer created a story about an underground city not an underwater one, except in the city being below sea level.

A complete underwater city is way beyond the budget of 1966

Not really! The most expensive part of filming was the location work; simply land the Tardis in a tunnel as normal and describe the city as underwater in the dialogue with airlocks etc and it would have been cheaper. I also draw your attention to the classic pre-Who serial City Beneath the Sea and its sequel Secret Beneath the Sea...

SD, but they go down a lift in Episode 1.... we are a LONG way down.

But it's still underground, only underwater by virtue of being below sea level; the lift comes from the above ground surface of the island after all.

Reversing the polarity of the neutron flow. I bet that means something. It sounds great.