"It is now for them to demonstrate to the world that those who can fairly carry an election can also suppress a rebellion; that ballots are the rightful and peaceful successors of bullets, and that when ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided there can be no successful appeal back to bullets; that there can be no successful appeal except to ballots themselves at succeeding elections."
- Abraham Lincoln

China plans to raise taxes on foreign businessesAlso interesting: The situation in Cape Verde, where they're worried about losing donations from abroad that keep them from being exceptionally poor. At some point or another, every poor country has to get off the aid train and find a way to get wealthy that doesn't depend upon natural resources.

Bees have too much stressHuge numbers of beehives are failing, and it's not just a problem for honey producers -- if the bees don't fly, they can't pollinate effectively, and that threatens crops

EU promises big energy changes, but are they the best way?They're planning to cut carbon dioxide emissions by 20% and to get 20% of their energy from renewable fuels by...conveniently...2020. The problem isn't the intent so much as the likely course of execution. They'll probably just tax conventional energy sources and impose new regulations. It would seem much more efficient to offer incentive prizes and encourage innovation rather than impose new rules and costs that will hurt the region's economic growth.

Americans up to their eyeballs in debtThe country as a whole is carrying about $876 billion in revolving debt -- that's the credit-card kind of stuff. Assuming that country's total population is about 300 million, that's about $2,920 in revolving debt per person, or at 2.6 people per household, about $7,600 per household in credit-card-type debt. Assuming many people are paying 19% per year on that debt (which isn't unlikely), the interest alone on that debt is draining more than $1,400 from the average household. That's $1,400 per year in total deadweight to the household budget. In the reverse case, a household investing $1,400 per year at a very conservative rate of 5% per year would have earned $53,000 in interest over 30 years. So the word that household net worth is way up is wildly misleading: For many households, the deadweight of debt is a real killer. (Not to mention that Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are skewing the net worth calculation to the upside...and they don't have any credit-card debt.)

Iranian general defects to United StatesMeanwhile, there's evidence that "pressure groups" -- in essence, thugs who use violence to enforce their political will -- are in resurgence in Iran. That's the kind of news that makes the FBI's abuse of the Patriot Act especially disappointing. Evil collapses in upon itself as long as good people are allowed to stand freely against it. But when a law-enforcement agency of the world's leading light for liberty lies about its use of illegal surveillance, that makes it hard for people to continue believing in the system. The government can't just assume that people will trust the government's goodwill while it erodes the civil liberties that make the nation great in the first place. The Patriot Act was an overreaction, and it's little surprise that it's being abused. It doesn't help that local politicians are engaging in soft-serve socialism, either -- passing too many laws to restrict people's freedom in the name of "helping" them.

Higher tax bills for TV watchersIowa SF 390 would impose a brand-new 5% tax on cable and satellite TV service in Iowa. Why? So they can offset the tax giveaway the house is planning to offer fitness centers? Oddly, on the other side of the coin, House File 680 would give away tax breaks to people making copies of videos. What's going on here? What makes those firms so special that they don't have to pay taxes like everyone else?

Carbon neutrality is bad lawSomeone in the Iowa Senate has spent too much time watching Al Gore's film: Senate File 391 would force any new power plants or factories built in the state to be "carbon neutral." Meanwhile, SF 286 would force power companies to reduce our energy use by 12% within five years. Simultaneously, SF 288 would mandate energy-efficiency rules in the state building code. It's one thing to ensure that inhabitants won't be killed by shoddy construction; but is it reasonable to mandate the amount of insulation they have, too? Heavy-handed regulations won't solve man-made global warming. On the opposite end of the scale, the Senate is also looking at SF 393, which would give sales-tax refunds to IT facilities for their power bills. So on one hand, they want to beat up the power companies, but on the other, they want to subsidize consumers for using more. All the while, SF 394 would create tax giveaways for power generation using biofuels. Meanwhile, HF 498 would create an "Iowa Power Fund" and an "energy independence office," which just sound like new ways for the government to subsidize certain businesses at the expense of all the others. The same goes for HSB 266, which would spend lots of money on "development and commercialization" of "targeted industries." And for HF 698, which includes giveaways for "high-quality job creation." And for HSB 271, which gives away tax money for "entrepreneurial endowments." Someone dig up a Five-Year Plan: The amount of micromanagement under consideration is disturbing. If we really want to cut energy consumption and the pollution it creates, a few inducement prizes for energy innovations would be more than sufficient.