This is the class blog for Eng 1102 at GA Tech called "Fiction, Human Rights, and Social Responsibility." The purpose of this blog is to extend our discussion beyond the classroom and to become aware of human rights issues that exist in the world today and how technology has played a role in either solving or aggravating them. Blogs will be a paragraph long (250 words) and students will contribute once every three weeks according to class number. Entries must be posted by Friday midnight.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

China: Draconian Legal Interpretation Threatens Online Freedom

“This is NOT an analysis of the article, etc.
It is your response/opinion.”
Our assignment is to blog about our opinion on a human rights issue in the
world today. This assignment allows us the opportunity to freely express
ourselves and share our ideas with other students who may or may not agree with
us. We sometimes take this remarkable freedom for granted, however one look at
China’s new legal interpretation of online expression quickly reminds us just
how remarkable it is we can have such a freedom.

According to Human Rights Watch, the Supreme
People’s Court’s ruling makes defamation and creating disturbances applicable
to expressions online. Defamation is already a criminal offense under Chinese
Law so why not expand this law to all of cyberspace? Seems reasonable, right?
Well, the new interpretation has not just taken the current law and
slapped it onto the World Wide Web. Instead, it has been expanded to a point so
vague, “that anyone can be jailed for exposing
official wrongdoing, or indeed saying anything the government doesn’t like.”
This concept of being penalized for criticizing the government seems so
foreign, maybe because it is so natural for us to see every news station giving
their own take on just how badly our government is dealing with a certain
situation.

Furthermore, online expression is just
that, a chance for individuals to express their opinions about their lives and
more importantly, their government. Freedom of expression is necessary for improvement
and growth. We learn from our blunders but how will China learn and grow if it
is unwilling to hear what its people have to say?

1 comment:

Right, Eve. I think this was the original intention and desire of the beginning of the Internet. And I think that the web has served as a forum for free expression in many cases. But at the same time the internet was born, so was surveillance of it. And, of course, those countries wanting to repress its people, are going to use it to identify and punish dissidents. I think the web is great, but I am not sure that we can truthfully think of it as a place for freedom of expression without consequences. This kind of change cannot happen virtually, but it must happen on the ground, in the country in which repression is political practice.