Abortion after a certain period of time is bad i agree. But for young girls who are raped and made pregnant deserve the right to abort the fetus of a rapist.

You cant go round saying victims must have a rapists baby, thats no better than raping a girl yourself, that IMHO is another form of tyranny.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21275167

Pro-choicers always say, "What about in cases of rape or incest?" to which I always respond, "I am not going to speak to the exception. The fact is that the VAST majority of abortions performed around the world are NOT in response to rape or incest. They are performed so that people can avoid being inconvenienced by results of their irresponsible choices.

I'm sure you mean well, but if the goal is to convince people to protect the unborn, then you should think how to best persuade people by careful use of language. Titles like that alienate the people you're trying to reach.

Many women have had an abortion. As such, all you are doing is immediately putting condemnation upon them. Instead you could create a topic like, "Come see what a baby in utero using a ultrasound scan. Or look at the marvelous beauty of babies while gestating." Then it's an opportunity to help someone who's suffering with guilt, maybe isn't saved, who made a terrible choice due to rape or incest, etc.

Isn't that your goal? To lead people to Christ? That's very hard to do when in their face. I hope you reconsider your strategy. It makes ministering to the nonbeliever very hard when you do it this way.

I'm sure you mean well, but if the goal is to convince people to protect the unborn, then you should think how to best persuade people by careful use of language. Titles like that alienate the people you're trying to reach.

Many women have had an abortion. As such, all you are doing is immediately putting condemnation upon them. Instead you could create a topic like, "Come see what a baby in utero using a ultrasound scan. Or look at the marvelous beauty of babies while gestating." Then it's an opportunity to help someone who's suffering with guilt, maybe isn't saved, who made a terrible choice due to rape or incest, etc.

Isn't that your goal? To lead people to Christ? That's very hard to do when in their face. I hope you reconsider your strategy. It makes ministering to the nonbeliever very hard when you do it this way.

I respect your opinion, but I don't believe candy coating the issue is helpful. There is freedom from condemnation in Jesus.

Don'tBeAfraidI'm sure you mean well, but if the goal is to convince people to protect the unborn, then you should think how to best persuade people by careful use of language. Titles like that alienate the people you're trying to reach.

Many women have had an abortion. As such, all you are doing is immediately putting condemnation upon them. Instead you could create a topic like, "Come see what a baby in utero using a ultrasound scan. Or look at the marvelous beauty of babies while gestating." Then it's an opportunity to help someone who's suffering with guilt, maybe isn't saved, who made a terrible choice due to rape or incest, etc.

Isn't that your goal? To lead people to Christ? That's very hard to do when in their face. I hope you reconsider your strategy. It makes ministering to the nonbeliever very hard when you do it this way.Anonymous Coward 30307430

I respect your opinion, but I don't believe candy coating the issue is helpful. There is freedom from condemnation in Jesus.

Don'tBeAfraid................................It's not candy coating. It's winning the most souls because of the Great Commission. If we yell at people, very few will be saved. Even the saved ones will likely backslide. That's not a great way to bring people to Christ.

Realize they've been raised to think that a fetus isn't human. When you title like you did, they immediate pideon hole you into a box of a "fundamentalist Christian". You can present the Gospel better that you did, and offer precisely the same information.

That's the difference between yelling and saving.

Think back, there were few times that Yeshua yelled at the crowd. He did yell "You brood of vipers!" at the hypocrisy of religious people. Pray about it, and ask for the Holy Spirit to make you an effective ambassador for Jesus. I hope you do that, because I know you'll bring more people that way to the Kingdom.

People have to be called by God, and that happens when people recognize that they're afraid of their sin being revealed under the Light of God's Word. If you make them afraid, they'll stay away. If you preach forgiveness and sins and redemption by the sacrifice of Christ on the Cross, then you give them a way. If you put their sin in their face, they recoil. Don't you want them to seek forgiveness instead?

In my opinion it is much worse than murder. A person who was murdered had the chance to experience life. Taking that away from a person to be is maybe the worst thing you can do to another living being.

It's not candy coating. It winning the most souls because of the Great Commission. If we yell at people, very few will be saved. Even the saved ones will likely backslide. That's not a great way to bring people to Christ.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30307430

No one is yelling. Watch the video above of the woman who survived an abortion. She herself refers to the procedure as murder. What term do you think Jesus would apply to it? He made many people uncomfortable too.

You know how long it takes for someone on an adoption list to actually get a child?... 7 years!!!

Know how many kids there are in the world who don't have parents already?

Of the 0 - 2 year olds: 1 out of 4 don't have parents.Of the 2 - 3 year olds: 1 out of 3... no parents.Of the 3 - 5 year olds: 1 out of 4 do not have parents.

If the parent is well aware that they will not be able to care for this child because of the financial strain they have every right to abort the baby. Especially if there are already millions without care.

Why the hell would you want to bring a kid into this world anyway. We have to sort it all out for ourselves before we can even consider passing it onto the next generation.