Today in Sociology class, we started the race subject. First we started with an article that had statistics that 1/3rd of blacks in from 20-29 are criminals. And my liberal commie teacher writes on the board
Are 1/3rd of blacks criminals?

I’m thinking to myself typical liberal question. Didn’t we just see the statistics?
So I argue with him and he says he hasn’t seen any articles that prove that race has affect on crime and I tell him he’s reading liberal papers. So I said tomorrow that I would bring some sources that show a DIRECT CORILATION with race and crime.
Im going to start looking now, if anyone knows of any please respond! Thanks!

1. Keep a respectful tone in their classroom. If you set out to embarass the prof. on their turf you'll make an enemy and it makes you look bad.

2. Challenge their argument, not THEM. Act as if you're both trying to get to the Truth. "Let's clarify this for the whole class, what you're saying is...and I'm saying...?" You're not going to change their mind in one conversation. Try to make their argument look WEAK, while yours is SENSIBLE.

3. Get to the point, don't try to "intellectualize" them. They've had lots of practice in the Ivory Tower.

Here's a link. I suggest looking under "demographics". Make sure you tell them where you got your material. If you rest your case on the findings of our own Department of Justice, then it's THEIR numbers, not yours:

Yeah, i did not raise my tone or anything. It was a formal argument, im still in highschool. This teacher is the biggest liberal i have seen. He has a method of spewing his propoganda not to bring it out harsly on the students but to do it.
I am with a few of my friends who are also racially aware and they will help argue against him.

Anyone have any articles on genetic differences between the races? Any credible news papers? Thanks for the replies!

Don't let the statistics be manipulated. For example, at first glance it looks like their is only a slight difference in the rate of murder by blacks than by whites. However, when you take into consideration that the black population is only 20% of the American Population that changes the significance of the fact that they are committing over half the murders. There are some excellent posts here at stormfront by Jack_boot explaining the following type of statistical presentation.---The murder count for 1995 totaled 21,597, a total 7 percent lower than 1994 and 13 percent lower than 1991. The murder rate was 8 per 100,000 inhabitants.
---Based on supplemental data received, 77 percent of murder victims in 1995 were males, and 88 percent were persons 18 years or older. By race, 49 percent of victims were black and 48 percent were white.
---Data based on a total of 22,434 murder offenders showed that 91 percent of the assailants were males, and 85 percent were 18 years of age or older. Fifty-three percent of the offenders were black and 45 percent were white.
---Fifty-five percent of murder victims were slain by strangers or persons unknown. Among all female murder victims in 1995, 26 percent were slain by husbands or boyfriends, while 3 percent of the male victims were slain by wives or girlfriends.
---By circumstance, 28 percent of the murders resulted from arguments and 18 percent from felonious activities such as robbery, arson, etc.
---In approximately 7 out of every 10 murders reported during 1995, firearms were the weapons used.

Pirub9, Why don't you just give us all your assignments for the week and we will find what you need. No, don't feel the need to thank us. Knowing we were able to do this for you is thanks enough. Think of us as the masked men. We can't stand thankyous.One thing. Be a little more specific in the future before I spend an hour reading through that nit, Frankie Wheel's post.

Pirub, see if you can find The Bell Curve in the library or poke around the net for excerpts you can download.

Trust me, that one book will do for a whole year's worth of trouble with teacher.

The hypothesis of the authors is that the prime determinant of social status in the United States is intellect - not race.
Sure enough, they proved their hypothesis; only the most hidebound egalitarian will not accept the study on it's merits.

So - if it's NOT race, why are negroes still mired on the bottom? Well, actually, it IS race, too - the average negro IQ (in America) is 85. Pursuant to demonstrating this, the authors, Murray and Herrnstein, had to demonstrate a racial correlation to IQ.

Race matters, then. There are biological differences. It's not the color of the skin, nor the appearance of the negro at all. It's the low IQ. Negroes don't succeed, generally speaking, because they simply can't. But negroes with higher than average IQ's were doing just fine. Problem is, only 16% have an IQ of 100 or more.