Did you ever consider what those birth certificates and census forms were REALLY about?

Who owns you? Some disturbing facts that affect everyone!

These are some of the facts which are so shrewdly hidden that the mere ability comprehend what they truly entail is beyond most Americans. The list is fairly long, but it is worth the read.

The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)
The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg.113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)
The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of operating under bankruptcy its finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the creditors or share holders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C. 914

[it gets crazier from there, eg:]

Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)
The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)
A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209)

Also, if the Pope could abolish any law of the United States (which you claim doesn't exist... which makes me wonder why it refuses to follow many international treaties if it doesn't exist) then why has Roe v. Wade not been overturned? (And if the Pope owned Britain, then why do the British fly in the face of what the Pope says and get away with it?)

Unbelievably, this conspiracy theory is actually falsifiable. Epic fail. You lose, good sir.

Britain, which has its own personal church created almost entirely to annoy the then-Pope? Britain whose head of state is also head of this self same church? That Britain? That's the one you think is run by the Vatican? The Britain in which a large part of the population wanted the Pope arrested on his recent (and only since the Tudors iirc) visit?

Oh boy, I simply can't wait for your attempt to justify that statement.

Tax protestor arguments mixed with "freeman" claims, liberally seasoned with willful misreadings of law and court decisions, served with the chef's personal crazy sauce, with a side order of delusions.

Some truths, most fairly easily discerned (though most people are either too occupied or too lazy to do so) mixed in with increasing amounts of bullshit. You do realise that blending fact with fiction doesn't turn the latter into the former, right?