Tap-and-go card fraud in Australia low: financial institutions

Beverley Head

Tap-and-go card fraud in Australia is costing about 2¢ for every $100 of legitimate spending – half the rate of conventional card fraud, and a third of the rate of international card fraud, according to Visa.

And that's why Australia’s major banks, the Australian Payments Clearing Association and cards issuers such as MasterCard and Visa have been left scratching their heads over suggestions by the Victorian Police last week that there is a runaway increase in theft and fraud associated with contactless payment cards. They all claim that is at odds with their experience.

A meeting of the Fraud in Banking group, which brings together financial institutions, regulators and police forces from around Australia, is scheduled to be held later this week in Melbourne, when the topic will again be raised.

What sparked the controversy was the release last week of Victoria Police statistics which revealed a 45 per cent increase in deception cases. The police said most of that increase was due to misuse of tap-and-go cards with thieves specifically seeking the cards in car and home burglaries.

Advertisement

Victoria Police has been contacted for further comment.

Visa’s senior director of risk services, Ian McKindley, said the company monitored card fraud internationally, adding that the Australian rate of card fraud in face-to-face (not online) transactions was one of the lowest in the world. He added that the rate of contactless fraud was half that of other cards despite 45 per cent of all face-to-face card transactions in Australia now being contactless.

Mr McKindley said that after removing internet fraud (transactions knows as card-not-present are a bigger financial fraud problem for the banks) the Australian cost of fraud using conventional cards was 4¢ in $100, contactless was around 2¢ in every $100, while the global figure is 6¢ in the $100.

Not only was the cost of fraud lower, criminal gangs had been unable to counterfeit the contactless cards, he said, alluding to the active underground market for stolen credit cards and payment details.

Mr McKindley said that Visa had been liaising with the Victorian government over its concerns since September.

Unlike most other states and territories in Australia, which simply record any reports of card theft at local police stations, in Victoria copies of reports of card theft are provided to issuing banks, which investigate the cases in place of Victoria Police.

Police forces were, however, alerted by the banks and card issuers if there was evidence of possible criminal gang activity in a particular area.

“These cards use the same intelligent systems that look for stolen card activity to identify possible fraud on customers’ cards. This helps prevent fraud if the systems believe your card has been stolen. As is the case with credit cards, the bank may contact the customer to check that a transaction is legitimate. If a customer cannot be contacted, a staff member will decide whether to block the card until the bank can talk to the customer.”

Consumers who are issued with contactless payment cards are not yetable to disable that function, which was one of the concerns raised by Victorian Police and consumer protection bodies. However eftpos Australia, which is developing its own contactless payment card and smartphone app, is still deciding what limits it will set for contactless transactions (it may be lower than the $100 limit on the major cards) and whether it will allow users to turn off the tap-and-go function.

While the ABA was unable to comment on the extent of smartphone-based tap-and-go payments fraud, the still relatively low penetration of mobile payments apps coupled with the fact that many are secured with a PIN, suggests this is less of an issue for the banks and card issuers at present.

APCA CEO Chris Hamilton welcomed any efforts to reinforce the need for consumers to treat payment cards or apps with the same care as cash, but said APCA’s own statistics had not revealed a sudden surge in contactless card fraud.

However, he noted that the rise of chip and PIN cards, and the planned move away from the use of signatures to complete payments, was perhaps forcing an “opportunistic” change in criminal behaviour. Chip and PIN cards “shut down counterfeiters and skimmers” he said, which may have prompted a rise in direct card theft.

That had also been seen in other markets, such as Britain, when chip and PIN were rolled out, he said.

5 comments so far

The only fraud that's a problem is the Banks ripping of the merchant's by defaulting paywave as a credit transaction and charge merhants a higher fee even if you use your own money from your savings. That's a major fraud!

Commenter

Thanh

Location

Sydney

Date and time

June 04, 2014, 11:27AM

Speaking like a merchant by the sounds. From an ex-banker, merchant facilities are the one thing you can haggle with quite easily with and get a better deal from your bank.

Plus, work out the average transaction amount you put through and work out whether a flat $0.25 - $1.25 fee per transaction is better than a percentage of the total. Also remember that Amex, Diners, Mastercard and Visa have their set rates in those fees charged.

Also if you are using credit, it doesn't matter what the origin of the funds are from, it's still going through the credit channel. Remember the transactions and services are insured by Mastercard and Visa which is why the transactions are "credit" only. They guarantee it's safety therefore nominate how it will be used so they can offer said guarantee. You wouldn't guarantee a product and then allow the customer to choose who it will be used would you?

Commenter

RA22

Date and time

June 04, 2014, 3:18PM

Could the card-providers have been so wrong accidentally, or are they deliberately ignoring all of the evidence and concerns that have been accumulating for some years. I vote for the latter.

Commenter

John

Location

Canberra

Date and time

June 04, 2014, 3:34PM

I can see on a horizon trade without cash. Cash will be forbidden from transactions, we will have to use our cards. Big Brother is coming real soon now.

Commenter

nailer

Location

Sydney

Date and time

June 04, 2014, 10:31PM

They're both right (and both wrong) since the Vic cops and the banks both reported DIFFERENT figures. The banks gave the rate of wave & go fraud relative to other card frauds, the Vic cops gave it as a % increase on the previous year. These cards are still fairly new and being rolled out - anything in it's early years is going to face rapid increases in terms of %. The Vic cops figure is more indicative that it is a new product that is being quickly rolled out. To be meaningful they should give their % increase based on the number of frauds PER PERSON with a pay & wave card, not the total number of frauds. After all, one case last year .. two this year .. that's a 100% increase. Sounds a lot, but it's only ONE extra case.

Subscribe to IT Pro

Editor's Choice

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has bolstered Malcolm Turnbull's ministerial duties, handing him greater responsibility for e-government in a push to expand the use of a single digital identity for Australians.

Data

The new roof that spans Margaret Court arena does more than keep out the weather. Built into the gantries that surround the sliding ceiling are Wi-Fi antennas that beam web access to every ticket holder.