Friday, April 22, 2016

The RNC Rules Meeting - Media Hypes 54-2 as Bitterly Divided

If you skim articles like the one below
in Politico, you would think that the RNC rules committee, and the entire
Republican Party, was tearing itself apart.
Typical quote is (emphasis added):

The
vote bitterly divided the party, pitting a small group eager to advance the proposal against RNC
Chairman Reince Priebus and his allies, who warned that implementing the change
would further inflame Donald Trump, who has accused the committee of overseeing
a “rigged” process that’s stacked against him.

As a guest attendee and member of the audience, I saw no bitter division either at the Rules Committee or the meeting as a whole.
The Party was in good spirits and saw Governor Kasich, Senator
Cruz, and Dr. Carson for Donald Trump with equal respect and interest. I heard officials for all campaigns and RNC
Members from across the country on board with supporting the nominee, whoever
that may be.

As far as what the actual substance of the Rules Committee
hearing, it was a debate of whether the convention should run under the rules
of the United States House of Representatives or “Roberts Rules.” In other words, this was not for or against a
candidate, nor was it debating any sort of substantive change in the Party’s
principles.

It was a debate discussed respectfully with everyone truly
getting along. Of course, the media
loves a fight, so it is only in the last sentence of the Politico
article that summed up what the meeting was really like:

“There’s been a little bit
written in the press about the work of this committee,” [Committee Chair] Ash
said. “Let’s be clear about one thing: This committee has done a good job
standing together.”

As far as the substance, the Democrat Convention and every
Republican Convention in the Party’s History except 1884 have been run under
House rules. As RNLA Chair Randy Evans
and Board Member John Ryder stated:

“We’re basically in the
seventh inning of a ballgame, and I don’t think it’s right to change the rules
of the game in the middle of the game,” argued Randy Evans, an RNC member from
Georgia. “Any change we make would be viewed with a very large degree of
cynicism.”

John Ryder, a member from
Tennessee who is the RNC’s counsel, warned that it would “subject this
committee to enormous political criticism.”

The committee agreed by a voice vote that I was told
unofficially was 54-2. No real
controversy. However, it did provide a
lot of media establishment types a chance to hype a fight. Problem was, there really wasn’t one.