Does anyone actually take this seriously? I'm asking not as a sarcastic insult but because I'm not going to begin dismantling it if no one is convinced by it. At no point does this essay intersect with actual psychology, rational sociobiological assumptions, or reality in general.

At 4/24/2011 12:49:39 AM, Grape wrote:Does anyone actually take this seriously? I'm asking not as a sarcastic insult but because I'm not going to begin dismantling it if no one is convinced by it. At no point does this essay intersect with actual psychology, rational sociobiological assumptions, or reality in general.

Yer mother is a rational sociobiological assumption.

"Seems like another attempt to insert God into areas our knowledge has yet to penetrate. You figure God would be bigger than the gaps of our ignorance." Drafterman 19/5/12

At 4/24/2011 12:49:39 AM, Grape wrote:Does anyone actually take this seriously? I'm asking not as a sarcastic insult but because I'm not going to begin dismantling it if no one is convinced by it. At no point does this essay intersect with actual psychology, rational sociobiological assumptions, or reality in general.

At 4/24/2011 12:49:39 AM, Grape wrote:Does anyone actually take this seriously? I'm asking not as a sarcastic insult but because I'm not going to begin dismantling it if no one is convinced by it. At no point does this essay intersect with actual psychology, rational sociobiological assumptions, or reality in general.

The essay is quite long and I cannot deal with all of it. What arguments specifically did you find convincing?

It's actually a chapter from a book.

This is a pretty good summary:"Intercourse occurs in a context of a power relation that is pervasive and incontrovertible. The context in which the act takes place, whatever the meaning of the act in and of itself, is one in which men have social, economic, political, and physical power over women. Some men do not have all those kinds of power over all women; but all men have some kinds of power over all women; and most men have controlling power over what they call their women--the women they f@ck. The power is predetermined by gender, by being male."

"What we really ought to ask the liberal, before we even begin addressing his agenda, is this: In what kind of society would he be a conservative?" - Joseph Sobran

The thesis is all wrong! Women control men with their sacred parts, not the other way around!

Haven't you noticed in relationships, girls will say "if you don't do this for me, you won't be getting any tonight."

Who cares if girls are the ones being penetrated, that doesn't make them less dominant, weaker, or vulnerable. Men penetrate their mouths with food every single day! Does that mean food is dominating men? No.