Pornography
and the Church

Larry E. Ball

Pornography is present everywhere in our society. From softcore
to hardcore, almost anywhere you look, pornography is available
for only a few dollars. Sometimes it's free -- just free enough
to entice a man to seek more. Cable television and the Internet
beckon men (and sometimes women) to step into the world of lust,
fornication, and adultery. In fact, softcore pornography is ordinarily
part of most television cable purchases, even without buying the
typical HBO package. Email communications are constantly delivering
invitations to look at hardcore pornography. Without some type
of filter, a man will be bombarded every day with an invitation
to participate in wickedness as he sits down at his computer.
Most employers have set strict rules to keep their employees off
of pornographic sites.

Pornography is a deathtrap, especially for men. Addiction to
pornography can send a soul to Hell. It is a cesspool that can
drown those who choose to come to its waters. No matter how sanctified
a man is, he is always a candidate for its deadly influence. Without
Biblical safeguards, such as a good marriage, prayer, God's Word,
accountability, and the desire to keep a good conscience, a man
will find himself easy prey for this ugly beast.

The number of men in America addicted to pornography is unknown.
But I have heard numbers that lead me to believe that at least
one in three men in America are addicted to pornography. Even
worse, I would surmise that addiction to pornography is rampant
in the church. Even worse than that, it is a major problem with
the clergy.

The Church Begins to Respond

The church must declare war on this evil sin. It is beginning
to do so. 'What was once tolerated as merely a weakness in men
is now being treated as adultery. Not only is it being treated
as adultery, but it is being treated as adultery that may very
well rise to the level that justifies a Biblical divorce. In other
words, men, if you get caught in the cesspool of pornography,
the church may very well determine that your wife has a right
to sue you for divorce, even if you have never physically touched
another woman. This ought to be alarming to any Christian man.

Many years ago, I was taught in seminary that the only grounds
for divorce was sexual unfaithfulness that involved actual physical
relations with someone other than the man's wife (not getting
into the issue of desertion here). After studying the Scriptures
and being in the pastorate for over thirty years, I have since
changed my mind. I am convinced now that a man can be so addicted
to pornography that it may be in a class of adultery that rises
to a level that justifies divorce without a man ever even touching
another woman. The word "mastered" might be a more appropriate
Biblical term, but recognizing some validity to modern psychological
terms, I have chosen to use the word "addicted." Men
may temporarily fall into this sin, but this is not addiction.
Addiction is habitual and controlling. It is parallel to being
a drug addict. Deliverance is seldom attained. Indeed, it is my
position that the wife may be justified in seeking a divorce through
the ecclesiastical courts of the church if her husband is under
this habitual and reigning power. Today, contrary to a number
of years ago, she may very well win her case.

Many women have had to live with the horrible effects of pornography
in their marriages. Traditionally, they have remained silent.
It is embarrassing when one's sex life with one's husband becomes
a public matter. For most women, it is better to live in misery
than to have her sex life discussed by other men. Also, with the
modern emphasis in evangelical and Reformed churches on submission
by wives, in some cases this has sadly resulted in many women
feeling guilty at the thought of challenging the sins of their
husbands. Shame and guilt are two powerful forces that have prevented
many wives from confronting this sin in a Biblical fashion.

Dr. Bahnsen's Theses

There are two documents that particularly have influenced me
to reconsider what I was taught in seminary years ago. The first
is a paper written by Dr. Greg Bahnsen entitled "Theses on
Divorce and Spousal Abuse." In his October 2003 Chalcedon
Report 29 paper, Dr. Bahnsen broadens the traditional basis of
divorce from mere sexual unfaithfulness to the act of spousal
abuse. He says, "The above conclusion is explicitly substantiated
by the law of God at Exodus 21:10-11, demonstrating (a fortiori)
that spousal abuse violated the marriage covenant, and, as such,
[is] grounds for divorce."

The second is a Committee Report to the General Assembly of
the Presbyterian Church in America in 1983. It stated, "One
might argue that pornography and masturbation per se are not grounds
for divorce; but if a person becomes so dependent on them that
they become a substitute for fulfilling the conjugal rights of
the spouse, then they could be understood to break the one flesh
union." The Report goes on to say that "all of these
are unclear cases, and judgment will have to rest with the Session
in their application of Biblical principles." The Report
concludes, "But, when that sexual sin becomes externalized
in such a way that it becomes a substitute for the one flesh relation
with one's spouse, the Session may judge it as being porneia."

Thus, if addiction to pornography breaks the one flesh union,
then it defiles the marriage bed. As such, it may very well break
the marriage covenant and become a Biblical basis for divorce.
Church courts are beginning to recognize this fact.

How then may addiction to pornography defile the marriage bed
and break the marriage bond? Let me attempt an explanation. If
a man comes into the marriage bed and does not provide due benevolence
to his wife as a result of living in the world of pornography,
then the one flesh relationship is broken and the marriage bed
does become defiled. When the marriage bed is defiled, then the
marriage bond is severed. In 1 Corinthians 7:3, Paul says, "Let
the husband render unto his wife due benevolence" (KJV).
Other translations use the word "debt" rather than "benevolence."
In the marriage relationship, conjugal relations are indeed a
debt, but as the KJV translators recognized, it is also benevolence.
Benevolence implies affection expressed during the act of conjugal
relations. Every wife (as well as husband) is due affection in
the form of conjugal relations, not just the right to participate
in a sexual act.

What a Woman Must Have

A woman's view of conjugal relations typically differs from
that of a man. Most men would interpret the benevolence in 1 Corinthians
7 as debt being fulfilled if he is physically satisfied with the
sexual act itself. For most wives, there is more importantly a
deep need for affection and loving benevolence. This text in 1
Corinthians must not be interpreted as being fulfilled merely
if a wife is given the opportunity to participate in a sex act.
The benevolence due to a wife is primarily affection directed
toward the wife that ultimately will help her enjoy fulfillment
in the sexual act itself.

For a woman who knows that her husband is addicted to pornography
and has been sleeping with other women with his eyes and his mina
receiving her due benevolence from him becomes impossible. His
sexual overtures in the bed only become an opportunity for him
to sleep with another woman. His wife knows this. She knows that
this is not affection. It is defilement. In her mind there is
another woman in the bed who is actually a nameless slut who gets
paid to expose herself to men and lead them to destruction "like
an ox goes to the slaughter" (Pr. 7:22).

This does not imply that perfect marriages exist and that conjugal
expressions of love are always perfect. However, it does imply
that in the case of addiction to pornography by a husband, when
such addiction is known by the wife, it often becomes impossible
for the wife to receive the debt owed to her in affection and
dedication -- in essence, due benevolence. The sexual relationship
often becomes repulsive to her. It becomes disgusting. The one
flesh union has been broken and the marriage bed does indeed become
defiled. Again, this need not become justification for any wife
to pursue divorce because the husband does not fulfill perfectly
the benevolence due her in the sexual relationship. However, it
does give a wife the right to claim that when there is habitual,
continual addiction to sordid pornography, then she can claim
that the marriage bed has been defiled and that she therefore
has a right to pursue divorce. Her husband has not been sleeping
with her, but with a harlot.

It should also be noted that addiction to pornography seldom
occurs in isolation. Usually it is attached with other sins such
as deceit, financial mismanagement, and even on occasion physical
abuse. These just add to the burden that the wife has to endure,
usually silently and secretly. These sins must be distinguished
from addiction to pornography, but seldom can they be separated
from pornography. Addiction to pornography does not only bring
defilement to the marriage bed, but it also brings destruction
and devastation to all the other facets of marriage.

Reclaiming Male Headship

Today in conservative Christian circles where men are seeking
to reclaim their headship, husbands must remember that with headship
come grave responsibilities. One responsibility of every husband
is to make his wife happy by loving her as he loves himself and
as Christ loved the church. This includes sexual fidelity and
avoiding pornography. This is a critical issue for the modern
church. It has fallen upon the church of our age to make a clear
and unambiguous statement. Addiction to pornography is spreading
like cancer. Only those with God's Spirit shall survive its consequences.
Many men in the Christian church are this very day addicted to
pornography. Some of these men may be reading this article.

Many Christian women have had to live with husbands addicted
to pornography for years. They do not know what to do. They need
help and they are afraid to reach out to the church. I am afraid
that the church by its silence has been sending a message to these
women that they need to "Stand By Your Man." Must the
wives of men in the church be asked to live with a man addicted
to pornography? When such addiction rises to the degree that it
is impossible for the wife to receive her "due benevolence,"
what shall she do? 'When the one flesh union is broken and the
marriage bed is defiled, then does the wife have a Biblical basis
for divorce? These are difficult questions and the truth is often
in the details, but the church is now being called upon to deal
with these issues in a Biblical manner.

The decision to pursue divorce by any wife must be taken with
all seriousness. It should not be made in haste, but only after
spending much time in prayer, and receiving wise counsel from
other godly men and women. A decision to pursue divorce should
only be made after every Biblical means has been taken to achieve
confession, repentance, forgiveness, and restoration of the marriage.

Yet, having said this, the church has the responsibility to
warn men of God of the consequences of addiction to pornography.
Also, their wives should be informed of their Biblical rights
before God. When addiction to pornography destroys the one flesh
union and defiles the marriage bed, and after all Biblical avenues
have been exhausted, then wives should be informed that they do
indeed have the right to pursue divorce in ecclesiastical courts.
It is my opinion that even if the husband repents (which is very
difficult to judge) the wife still has the right to pursue divorce,
even though she is not obligated to do so.

This is a difficult topic to deal with in a public forum, and
I have tried to do so with as much discretion as possible. However,
for the sake of many suffering women, I must not be silent.

Rev. Larry Ball is pastor of Bridwell Heights Presbyterian
Church, Kingsport, Tennessee. He is also a CPA.

There are, in my experience, two kinds of users of porn;
the casual "recreational" user, and the addict, and
of those there are Christians and non-Christians. My experience
is limited, but here's some of it.

There is a fine line between recreational use and addiction
of porn, for the reason that the side affects can linger for house,
days, weeks, months after use. When an alcoholic is drunk,
it is physically noticeable (slurred speech, staggered walk, violence,
etc.), but when someone is high on sexual images, they have no
outward signs. These images don't wear off like the affects
of alcohol or pot. They can be "burned" into our
male minds, even categorized and neatly filed away for use later.
As Steve Arterburn points out in Every Man's Battle,
men get sexual gratification through the physical act, and with
their minds. Make no mistake about this, the porn industry
is the single most profitable industry on the Internet because
they have totally dialed in the male mind at it's sexual core,
and have exploited it. Whereas porn was hardly brought up
in conversation less than 10 years ago, I hear it mentioned on
radio and in conversations frequently these days. TV has
gotten worse in crossing the line here too, as you are all aware.
It appears to me that the general public, at least in the
San Francisco Bay Area, have started moving towards acceptance,
similar to acceptance of occasional drunkenness at a party.

As I see it, approaching the recreational user about this issue,
from a Biblical standpoint, will have little weight as far as
change in behavior, since quoting scripture has no relevance to
them. I suspect most people know that porn isn't a good
choice for a solid relationship, over the long haul, but struggle
with acceptance because it doesn't appear to be going away anytime
soon. To battle this issue on any scale larger than the
personal level, may not seem possible to the average modern man/woman
these days. This brings the battle to the internal grounds
of the mind and heart, which is an area that modern man/woman
feel they can control on their own, and matters to no one else
but themselves.

The key here, I think, is in finding common ground. I'm
not suggesting hiding scriptural truths, or watering down the
message, but perhaps starting with the general concepts of relationships;
connection, intimacy, trust, and love. Probing for their
understanding of these things will get them talking. If
we spend the majority of our time listening and understanding
what this person thinks and believes (taking note, reserving judgment)
about these things it is more likely they will eventually ask
us what we think about the same things. Everyone wants to
be heard and understood. If we are "quick to listen,
slow to anger, slow to speak" we will eventually be able
to show the difference that Christ makes.

We do, however, need to be prepared (in advance) to talk about
this in a way that is different than the average modern man/woman
may have experienced before. Factoids of information about
porn may work on some, others may just be listening for a hint
of hypocrisy in our views, or a judgmental condemning attitude.
Christian stereotypes about sex can hardly be avoided in
conversations today. We owe it to ourselves and to others
to be well prepared to discuss this topic, especially when the
conversations are men with men, women with women. Any transparency
and honesty that Christ gives us to share should be expressed
at the appropriate times. I can't stress this enough. Nothing
breaks down stereotypes and walls like transparency into our own
struggles, as Christians.

Those that are addicts need something like a 12-step approach,
before any talk of scripture or God, or change, will have any
meaning. It can be difficult to asses when one crosses the
line between recreational use and addiction. The 12-steppers
will say that it is the addict that makes this distinction on
their own, and sometimes through intervention.

On the flip side are those Christians who struggle with this.
I have yet to meet a Christian man who does not struggle
with this at some level or another. Ironically scripture
doesn't really "work" all the time here either. The
power of guilt or shame, or the hidden nature of it all often
blocks the truth. I'd suggest getting the brother or sister
to talk it out, on their own, in their own time. Confession
has a wonderful side affect of revealing the truth of the issue
and what should happen next. It is my experience that Christians
are usually so glad to be able to talk to someone about this,
that it does lots towards starting changed behavior and healing.
Porn first and foremost is an illusion, but is an illusion
that can be easily broken, when the other person is able to talk
out their behavior and see it for themselves. Christ become
the light when there is room for confession. It has been
my personal experience that spiritual growth and maturity makes
this less attractive. I've noticed that I've "grown
out of it" more than I've "defeated" it, and I'm
still growing.

One last thought. I think it is a mistake to go into
any conversation about this with an unspoken "goal"
of getting them to "quit". Sex is a powerful force.
Christians understood this, historically, and sometimes
imposed crazy "rules" about what is and isn't ok, because
they recognized this same power, and it's potential misuse. There
is no cookie cutter approach. Just like all affective evangelism,
we have to approach people as individuals, and people, no different
then ourselves. We can act as pointers to Christ, He must
do the rest.