Where do moral decision become legal ones?
The role the law should - or can - play in dictating what happens in the bedroom has been
a matter of debate for years.

It's is particularly in focus now with the news that two 12-year-old girls are pregnant,
and the claims by a 14-year-old boy - responsible for one of the pregnancies - that he has
slept with 10 girls.

Although underage sex is an especially difficult area for the law to have its desired
effect, it is one where there are potentially high penalties.

The rules The age at which girls can lawfully have sex is 16, but there are extra rules
applying to the under-13s.

The law presumes that when a girl is under 13 she is not mature enough to consent to
sex. So even if a 12-year-old girl willingly has intercourse, as far as the law is
concerned, she has not "consented" to it because legally she is not able to.

(This concept is similar to the age of criminal intent, which assumes that children under
10 cannot commit crimes because they do not understand what crimes are.)
The implication of the rule is that anyone who has sex with a girl under 13 is committing
what is termed "statutory rape". There is no defence to this charge - even if a
boy says the girl was willing or that he thought she was older than she was, it would not
matter.

The 14-year-old who has admitted making his 12-year-old girlfriend pregnant
If found guilty of statutory rape, the maximum sentence is life, but average sentences for
rape are between five and seven years.

In reality, though, a number of different factors will come into play, said Nottingham
Trent University law lecturer Liz Rodgers.

"Given the age of the child or the offender, the police are probably not going to
want to go that far. There's a lot of debate saying 'It's terrible', but when you're
dealing with individuals and bringing the law to bear especially on a younger age group,
it does tend to get quite grey," she said.

Even if the police did refer it to the Crown Prosecution Service, it may then be thought
not in the public interest for a prosecution to take place.

But she said it was interesting that until 1927, the age at which girls could get married
was 12.

The under 16sSo what would be the case if two 15-year-olds were having sex? Again, going by the
letter of the law, it is illegal for them to do so. But again, there is a grey area.

Judges: What is their role?
"There's a major difference between two 15-year-olds heavy petting and an adult
having sex with an underage girl or boy," said Ms Rodgers.

The law in these kind of cases not widely enforced. Even if the police did for some reason
get involved in a case, they may well decide not to proceed with it, and the CPS may stop
the case on public interest grounds.

But as it is a grey area, the individual circumstances of the case are going to be what is
conclusive, and the law does some times get involved. In March of this year, an
11-year-old boy was placed on the sex offender's register for three years for sexually
assaulting his two-year-old cousin.

Parents are in a difficult position. If they are aware of their underage children
having sex they could theoretically risk prosecution for aiding and abetting the unlawful
intercourse.

This might particularly happen if they permitted the sex to take place in their house, or
if they said: "Well, if you're going to do it, here's a condom."

Ms Rodgers said: "It's very difficult to convict [parents] for that - if kids want to
do it, they're going to find a way to do it."
But there is a possibility in the future that parents could be subject to a parenting
order, a new measure introduced by Home Secretary Jack Straw to make parents have some
responsibility for crimes committed by their children.

Jack Straw: Order a possibility
But this new order only applies where a crime has been proved, and is really designed to
address anti-social behaviour such as vandalism and theft.
But Ms Rodgers said a parenting order, perhaps instructing parents to discuss sexual
responsibility with their children, might be seen as a positive response.
Doctor's orders

And how about doctors? If a 12-year-old girl went and asked her GP about contraception,
what would be the doctor's responsibility?

GPs: Judgement is theirs
The law here is governed by the House of Lords ruling in the Gillick case, in which
Victoria Gillick challenged government advice to doctors that it was all right to
prescribe contraceptives to the under 16s.

A BMA spokeswoman said: "If a child goes to a doctor for advice they are entitled to
confidentiality if they are mature enough to be taking decisions about their own health.

"That is for the doctor to assess. The older a child gets, the greater must be the
presumption in favour of confidentiality.

"If a doctor suspects child abuse, however, there is a legal obligation to protect
that child from abuse."

Baby 'unplanned'
The 14-year-old, who claims he lost his virginity at the age of nine, admitted the
pregnancy was a mistake, but vowed to stand by his three-month pregnant girlfriend.

"At first we used condoms but we stopped after a while because I don't like them.
We knew she could get pregnant if we didn't, but we just carried on."

Sporting a baseball cap and earring, the youngster claimed he had slept with 10 other
girls but said this was his first long-term relationship.

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR:Copyright
holders: We are not trying to assert any rights to your article. We operate as
a repository with a virtually unlimited storage capacity. We capture and store
articles to prevent loss due to system crashes and the space limitations that most sites
operate under. We will remove your article if you wish. This is a non-profit
site. AgeOfConsent.com is a repository of both legal and commentary information on
laws relating to sexual activity. We do not, and can not offer any legal advice or
provide any legal counsel. Do not write to us requesting our advice or suggestions
-- your email will be ignored. This web site and its contents are in no way
affiliated, funded, or regulated by any Local, State, Federal or International government
agency or governing body. Information contained on this site has been provided by
readers and/or has been discovered through the research of volunteers. Other than
cursory review, no efforts have been made to independently verify the current status of
the legal statutes contained in these page nor whether any cases used as examples are
still precedent. Do not rely on this information to make legal decisions. You
should contact a legal advisor in your area for a proper determination of law on any
questions you might have. Any emails and other user comments and opinions included
on this site are the opinions of the creator of the message and are not necessarily those
of this site, its editors, advertisers or other affiliated entities.