Monday, October 27, 2014

For
nearly twenty years now, even since I first watched P&P2, I have believed
that Sholem Aleichem was very slyly alluding to the Bennet family in P&P,
when he conceived of the family of Tevye the Milkman, his wife Golda, and his
numerous daughters, each with her own very different character and suitor, three
of whom he marries off.

I
first posted about this in Janeites in 2001 after another listmember threw out
that same idea, and most of my focus was on the many parallels between the
respective wives, daughters, and suitors in Meryton and Anatevka.

And
even though this resonance, particularly with respect to Mrs. Bennet and Golda,
was enhanced in the translation of Sholem Aleichem’s original stories from page
to play, and then to film--of course Fiddler
on the Roof— it’s clear to me that the Bennets were already firmly in the
mind of the author sometimes referred to as the Yiddish Mark Twain a century
ago. So, I would suggest, he could even more readily fit the moniker “the Yiddish Jane Austen”.

However,
it was only today that I realized there was another rich vein of covert
allusion by Sholem Aleichem to Jane Austen hiding in plain sight, which focuses
on parallels between Mr. Bennet and Tevye themselves, and not merely on
parallels between their wives and daughters----specifically their shared love
of book study, in particular the Bible,
and their shared fondness for expressing that love aphoristically and
humorously.

Of
course everyone knows that Tevye practically never stops paraphrasing the Bible--interpreted
by him according to his own unique, off-center homespun theology— it’s his hilarious
yet poignant trademark, his go-to way of coming to terms with the often absurd and
even tragic conditions of his existence in the quintessential Jewish shtetl, Anatevka,
symbol of the soon to be vanished world of Eastern European Jewry from which my
own ancestors came, under the thumb of the cruelly anti-semitic Czar. And what
does Teye dream of, besides going to Jerusalem? He dreams of having the free
time to study the Torah.

But
what I only realized last night, by chance, was that Mr. Bennet, in his own
quintessentially English way, and reflecting a level of formal education and
polish which Tevye lacks, nonetheless does very much the same things, and feels
the same way, that Tevye does! His home library is his sanctuary, his “synagogue”, surrounded by his beloved holy books—and
if we dig a bit beneath the surface, we realize that one of those beloved holy books
must have been the Bible, just as with Tevye!

Mr.
B, after all, is the speaker of some of the most memorable epigrams and bon mots in the entire Austen canon—his only
serious rival in that department being Mary Crawford—and so, ironically, it is
he whom his daughter Lizzy inadvertently describes when she delivers one of her famous barbs to Darcy:

“"…I have always seen a great
similarity in the turn of our minds. We are each of an unsocial, taciturn
disposition, unwilling to speak, unless we expect to say something that will
amaze the whole room, and be handed down to posterity with all the eclat of a PROVERB."

Did
you catch that giant wink by JA to the Book of Proverbs? JA, the sly daughter
of an Anglican clergyman, gives Mr. Bennet’s wry humor a distinctly Biblical twist, focuses EIGHT TIMES on a
single word that has both Biblical (and Shakespearean) resonance: FOOL. And
that is our giant clue that zeroes in on one particular chapter in the Book of
Proverbs, as you will shortly see.

But
first consider Mr. Bennet’s eight references to fools and folly:

In
Chapter 7, he calls Lydia and Kitty “two of the silliest girls in the country”
and the reiterates to his wife “I must
so far differ from you s to think our two youngest daughters uncommonly
foolish.”

In
Chapter 13, he describes Mr. Collins to Lizzy as follows: “I
have great hopes of finding him quite the reverse. There is a mixture of
servility and self-importance in his letter, which promises well. I am
impatient to see him." and then when Mr. Collins follows him into his
library, he complains that he is “prepared
to meet with folly and conceit in every other room of the house, [but] he was
used to be free from them there.”

In
Chapter 23, he pronounced his agreeable experience “to discover that Charlotte
Lucas, whom he had been used to think tolerably sensible, was as foolish as his
wife, and more foolish than his daughter!” in marrying Mr. Collins.

In Chapter 42, he found consolation
for his folly in mismanaging Lydia and his finances but he also “to his wife he was very little
otherwise indebted, than as her ignorance and folly had contributed to his
amusement.”

In
Chapter 49, he pronounces "Wickham's a fool if he takes her with a farthing
less than ten thousand pounds. I should be sorry to think so ill of him, in the
very beginning of our relationship."

In
Chapter 53, once more in mock-petulant mode, he utters: "No, no. You forced me into
visiting [Bingley] last year, and promised, if I went to see him, he should
marry one of my daughters. But it ended in nothing, and I will not be sent on a
fool's errand again." But he does go, and then we learn that “Bingley was
punctual to his appointment; and he and Mr. Bennet spent the morning together,
as had been agreed on. The latter was much more agreeable than his companion
expected. There was nothing of presumption or folly in Bingley that could
provoke his ridicule, or disgust him into silence; and he was more communicative,
and less eccentric, than the other had ever seen him.

In
Chapter 57, finally, in describing Mr. Collins’s second letter to him, he
reports: “The rest of his letter is only about his dear Charlotte's situation,
and his expectation of a young olive-branch. But, Lizzy, you look as if you did
not enjoy it. You are not going to be missish, I hope, and pretend to be
affronted at an idle report. For what do we live, but to make sport for our
neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?"

And then, after Lizzy responds: "Yes—that
is what makes it amusing. Had they fixed on any other man it would have been
nothing; but his perfect indifference, and your pointed dislike,
make it so delightfully absurd! Much as I abominate writing, I would not give
up Mr. Collins's correspondence for any consideration. Nay, when I read a
letter of his, I cannot help giving him the preference even over Wickham, much
as I value the impudence and hypocrisy of my son-in-law.

So
the portrait is indelibly painted from one end of P&P to the other of a husband/father/scholar
who believes it is human nature, and one of life’s most piquant pleasures, as
he so aptly sums it up, “to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in
our turn.” In short, fools and folly, especially in family, are the fodder that
famously feed Mr. Bennet’s fetish. (So there, Mrs. Jennings, some wordplay on
the letter F).

But
now think about Mr. Bennet as you consider the following, being verses 1-12 and
18-19 in Proverbs 26, the subtitle might well have been “Fools & Folly”:

1
As snow in summer, and as rain in harvest, so honour is not seemly for a FOOL.

2
As the bird by wandering, as the swallow by flying, so the curse causeless
shall not come.

3
A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the FOOL's back.

4
ANSWER NOT A FOOL ACCORDING TO HIS FOLLY, LEST THAT ALSO BE LIKE UNTO HIM.

5ANSWER
A FOOL ACCORDING TO HIS FOLLY, LEST HE BE WISE IN HIS OWN CONCEIT.

6He
that sendeth a message by the hand of a FOOL cutteth off the feet, and drinketh
damage.

7
The legs of the lame are not equal: so is a parable in the
mouth of FOOLS.

8As
he that bindeth a stone in a sling, so is he that giveth honour to a FOOL.

9As
a thorn goeth up into the hand of a drunkard, so is a parable in the mouths of FOOLS.

10
The great God that formed all things both rewardeth the FOOL, and rewardeth
transgressors.

11As
a dog returneth to his vomit, so a FOOL returneth to his FOLLY.

12Seest
thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is MORE HOPE OF A FOOL THAN OF HIM.

…

18
As a mad man who casteth firebrands, arrows, and death,

19So
is THE MAN THAT DECEIVETH HIS NEIGHBOUR, AND SAITH, AM I NOT IN SPORT?

What
first caught my eye, and suggested this post to me, were verses 4&5, and then,
upon reading through the entire chapter, also verse 19. Don’t the first two uncannily seem to address
Mr. Bennet’s M.O. as a satirist? He takes special delight in deceiving Mr.
Collins, by answering his foolishness with a straight face, pretending to be
impressed, and never letting Mr. Collins in on the covert joke at his expense. And
Mr. Bennet is less careful when he repeatedly puts his foolish wife on,
answering her folly by leading her on, before zinging her.

And
then throw Verse 19 into the mix, and now JA’s veiled allusion becomes
extremely obvious, as Mr. Bennet’s most famous aphorism, in Chapter 57, “For what do we live, but to make
sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?" pings several keywords in that Verse.

Now,
the interesting question is, does that repeated practice make Mr. Bennet a fool
of a different kind, as Verse 4 suggests? Should he have been honest with his
guest, as Verses 5 and 19 advise? I think the answer is complicated, and that,
to me, is Jane Austen’s agenda in covertly alluding to those verses. She wants
those of her readers who hear the echo of Proverbs 26 to examine and reflect on
this question, and come to some reasoned opinion, recognizing that there is no
simple proverbial wisdom to guide us in life, but shades of grey that require
nuanced thinking.

What
is your answer about Mr. Bennet? Is HE a fool?

And
what do you think about the comparison between Mr. Bennet and Tevye? Who is a
wiser man?

Cheers,
ARNIE

@JaneAustenCode
on Twitter

P.S.:
Actually, I realized as I was composing this post, that I also heard a distinct
echo of Verse 6 in Charlotte Lucas’s covertly & deliberately planting the
false rumor of Lizzy and Darcy being engaged in her foolish husband’s ears. Charlotte
does this, according to Kim Damstra in 1999, and then myself in 2004, so that Mr.
Collins will predictably turn the rumor into fact when he immediately informs
Lady Catherine, who will then predictably descend on Lizzy at Longbourn, all
resulting in the boomerang net effect of bringing Darcy and Lizzy together.

I
see this hidden pattern as JA’s playfully perverse special exception to the
rule of Verse 6, because sometimes fools are the very best messengers, when one
is a “Lucifer” like Charlotte, who cannot risk taking direct action, but who
figures out a way to turn fools into inadvertent puppets.

Follow by Email

Jane Austen Search Engine

A lovely bit of praise from my youngest (at heart) supporter in Seattle:

"...Two sessions were outstanding: Juliet McMasters on the more subtle, deeper meanings of "Northanger Abbey" and a Darcy-like young lawyer, Arnie Perlstein, who revealed his very plausible theory that the "shadow story" behind much of Jane Austen's work is the horror of multiple childbirth and women's deaths. I am a Jane-Austen-as-feminist person and this really resonated with me!"

Thank you, Mary!

"Arnie's theories [about Austen and Shakespeare] may strain credulity, but so much the greater his triumph if they turn out to have persuasive force after they are properly presented and maturely considered. That is what publication is all about"

"When great or unexpected events fall out upon the stage of this sublunary world—the mind of man, which is an inquisitive kind of a substance, naturally takes a flight behind the scenes to see what is the cause and first spring of them."--Tristram Shandy

About Me

I'm a 65 year old independent scholar (still) working on a book project about the SHADOW STORIES of Jane Austen's novels (and Shakespeare's plays). I first read Austen in 1995, an American male real estate lawyer, i.e., a Janeite outsider. I therefore never "learned" that there was no secret subtext in her novels. All I did was to closely read and reread her novels, while participating in stimulating online group readings. Then, in 2002, I whimsically wondered whether Willoughby stalked Marianne Dashwood and staged their “accidental” meeting. I retraced his steps, followed the textual “bread crumbs”, and verified my hunch. I've since made numerous similar discoveries about offstage scheming by various characters. In hindsight, it was my luck not only to be a lawyer, but also a lifelong solver of NY Times and other difficult American crossword puzzles. These both trained me to spot complex patterns based on fragmentary data, to interpret cryptic clues of all kinds, and, above all, not to give up until I’ve completed the puzzle--and literary sleuthing Jane Austen's novels (and Shakespeare's plays) is, bar none, the best puzzle solving in the world!