This is my very first post on the site!
Special thanks to undergroundmonorail for proofreading and tone critique!

I should probably have a much longer list than that for people that took a look at it, but I had a concept I was really excited about, I polished it up, and I'm confident that it isn't complete garbage.

Thank you for reading, and thank so many of you for being on the forums and in the chat to talk to me while I worked on this!

The Omega name was an attempt to find a middle ground between the actual use of the greek alphabet poetically, with Omega representing "the end", being at the end of the article, and the end of the series of univeres leading to the end, and the actual use of Omega in ordinal arithmetic were it is the first infinite cardinal/ordinal.

Fun fact: the spot in the series of ordinals I am referencing here is not actual epsilon, but a much smaller one: the Church-Kleene Ordinal, which is the smallest non-recursive ordinal, and the set of all recursive ordinals. Hence it being a "limit of infinities"

I really want to upvote this hard, because the idea is so cool and the first part of the article is so well done. I don't think I can yet, though, because of how many unclear statements, grammatical issues, misplaced words, and generally confusing sentence structures there are in some of the latter sections.

Following SCP-4000-B's demanifestation, MUORG's ongoing monitoring and research program led to the discovery of SCP-4000-C. SCP-4000-C is a meta-universal space, with properties similar to our own, equipped with a form of iterative intelligence (designated SCP-4000-C-1) able to alter the spaces inherent structure. Research indicates that in addition to our own multiverse, SCP-4000-A created this space, though no contact can be made with them to confirm this, and the space itself is shielded from outside contact.

I can't extract much understanding from this paragraph. Where is this space? Parallel to our reality, off in some conceptual dimension, or more like a pocket dimension that's local to a particular area of our universe? What kind of iterative intelligence is it that occupies this space? Is it a physical object, or a pattern of ideas, or what?
I also notice an ongoing issue with apostrophes - remember that "its" is possessive and "it's" is short for "it is", and many possessives like "space's" are missing apostrophes.

An entity (designated SCP-4000-C-2) resides in an isolated portion of SCP-4000-C, which is unable to be affected by SCP-4000-C-1. SCP-4000-C-2 closely resembles the cognitive of SCP-4000-A members, but a portion has been grafted to it's cognitive structure resembling that of a human being.

I really don't understand what's going on here. What do "closely resembles the cognitive of SCP-4000-A members" or "grafted to its cognitive structure" mean?

Between the dates of 4/13/2039 and 4/28/2039 a series of changes took place inside SCP-4000-C. MUORG researchers discovered two human consciousness had been introduced to the structure. These humans progressed through SCP-4000-C over the course of the following weeks, reaching the portion containing SCP-4000-C-2, at which point they rested for two hours and interacted with the entity. Following this, at the time of 16:43:22, on 4/28/2039, SCP-4000-C-2 created a self-perpetuating, infovorous singularity which consumed the entirety of SCP-4000-C.

This is a bit more coherent to me than the previous paragraphs, but it seems to assume a few fundamental ideas about the nature of 4000-C that are completely unstated. I'm still left pretty helpless to understand what's actually happening here, and it really seems like a lot of information that the Foundation should have put in the article isn't here.

I completely agree with everything you have to say here. When writing the -C section my goal was essentially to try and add an element of additional horror or interest, or just something meatier to the baseline concept of "The last question by Isaac Asimov but it keeps going".

Overall I think as it stands it feels somewhat like an afterthought, and Isn't explained very well as you said. over the next day or two I'm going to try and re-write this section in a way that makes it more coherent, and understandable as part of the rest of the story.

P.S As for the grammatical errors, I freeze up in fear every time I have to type it it's or its, and I still somehow get it wrong 3/4 of the time.

These infinite chains continued, until they too were unending. Infinity times infinity. Still no end in sight, we saw infinite infinities, infinite chains of infinite chains, each process being taken to its limit until it wasn't limits being taken to infinity, but infinite limits being taken.

In all seriousness though I was somewhat afraid that was something a lot of people would not understand from either a conceptual or storytelling point of view, but I thought it was important to have in there considering it's where the idea for the whole skip has its genesis. The idea being that as sapient life forms became more and more advanced, they would figure out ways to more quickly advance themselves, leading to infinite series of worlds.

The theme here is recursion, 1 plus 1 is 2, 2 plus 1 is three. three whole multiverses in this case. How far can we take this idea? Mathematics says we can take it much, much farther than expected, until the "1, 2, 3…" infinity we're used to seems incredibly small. The wikipedia article takes it as far as Infinity to the power of infinity, but the implication of the last portion of this skip is that it goes as far as it can, to a number known as the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Kleene_ordinal

Again that was all just my conceptualization, and I'm not sure if it should be taken into account when judging the thing in itself.

I know what infinity is, and I know what ordinal numbers are. It's fine to have them in this article. The passage I quoted doesn't have anything to do with ordinals; in fact, it says nothing that simply identifying the sequence of universes as "infinite" does not. It's just the word "infinite", repeated a few times, with a little glue to hold it together.

Straight up, I did not understand a word of your esoteric class description, and downvoted immediately. If you can't even justify it in-universe, I don't see a need for it. The rest of the article did nothing to suggest I change my vote.

I liked this, for the most part. Enough to upvote. Some things kind of lost me, as a non-science layperson — primarily the part with all the infinities. The point still came through just fine, but I did feel my eyes bouncing around the paragraph trying to lock on to the meaning.

Also don't think I really understood the concern from the sixth foundation, and how our universe almost destroyed all future ones. Maybe zero in on and flesh out that part? Highlighting the fragility of the happy ending would make it all the sweeter, I think.