Main menu

Monthly Archives: June 2013

Post navigation

WHEN I WAS GETTING THIS POST TOGETHER AND READING ALL WISDOM THAT WHITE FOLK HAD, IT DAWNED ON ME. THE REAL QUESTION THEY NEED TO BE ASKING IS NOT ABOUT THE COST OF ADOPTING ANY BABIES OR WHY YOU HAVE TO PAY TO ADOPT A BABY. THE REAL QUESTION FROM MY STANDPOINT IS WHY DO YOU HAVE TO ADOPT A BABY IN THE FIRST?

r j p: Fixed: Caryn Lantz and her husband, both white, are proud owners of two new pets.

Seriously though, this “The fees typically cover administrative costs, but also costs associated with taking care of the mother, like travel, rent, health care and counseling services. ” makes it sound like they are selling babies, especially when they being priced like they are automobiles. Why is a mulatto more than a pet? To me, they are the same.

Funruffian: I am literally shocked that any non-Black would pay money to adopt a Black orphan. I thought that it was either free of charge, or that you could get compensation for doing so.

reply borogirl54: I would think that this would be the case for Black boys, who are harder to place than black girls. From what I understand the easiest child to place is a light skinned black girl with straight hair.

Anon: You have no idea what happens when taxpayer dollars are involved.

If you want to see something unbelievable, do a search for “HIV-positive adoption”.

There are evil whites who will adopt HIV-positive orphans from Africa and bring these diseased trash here. Why oh why would they do this? First, they get lots of applause from their peers, so whatever moral failures they have, they feel great about themselves. And it doesn’t cost them anything because guess what, all these taxpayer-funded services start flowing to HIV-positive children. It’s so great to get a moral high and have someone else pay for it and suffer the lifelong costs and consequences of HIV-positive Africans being brought to the US. Each one of these precious babies is a burden of millions and millions of dollars on US taxpayers, and if they are boys they will soon enough start spreading it to white girls, destroying their futures.

D.B. Cooper: The cost to adopt the Caucasian child was approximately $35,000, plus some legal expenses.

If an expectant mom walks into the adoption agency’s office, and she looks like the lovely Dianna Agron (add an extra $20,000), and her ex boyfriend is a recent Air Force Academy graduate (add another $20,000) who looks like Captain America (add yet another $20,000); and I’ll bet the remaining $5,000 that the agent will have to excuse herself for a minute to wipe the drool from her mouth. While the agent is in the restroom, she will have to put in Visine to get rid of the dollar signs floating in her eyes.

reply eduard: The world has gone sicko, not to mention the overpopulation of the darkies. Wonder what Neil Patrick Harris paid for his babies. How morally sick can you get when you have all the bucks. As the saying goes: Money corrupts.

Anon: Same thing with eggs. I assume the value of black donor eggs is zero. Blond women with advanced degrees can charge $100,000 for an egg, in comparison. Black donor sperm, unless it’s from a top athlete, is probably also worth zero. Of course taxpayers will pay a million dollars for a black sperm donation or egg, in the form of raising the guy’s children, but the free market pays zero for those things.

Is anyone questioning why Rachel Jeantel can’t sell her eggs for the price of a coffee, while a highly educated white woman can sell hers for $100,000 or more? You would think that liberals would buy the cheapest eggs available, because the genetics make no difference, and the egg is going to be in a perfect environment from conception onward. Rachel Jeantel’s eggs should have the same market value and future hopes as the eggs of, say, Natalie Portman (went to Harvard) because the only thing that matters is the environment.

Howard W. Campbell: When my brother and his wife started the adoption process, the social workers were practically begging him to take little Dontavious off their hands. The state would even help out with most of the costs. If you would assume the care and feeding of a “Dontavious”, a (minority) cripple, or a crack baby, money could be found to help with the adoption expenses.

I would rather pay the 35k up front and avoid all of the issues that blacks will have when they hit the teenage years. While I am not a big fan of it, I can understand why parents will adopt Chinese girls. Sometimes, it takes an act of God to adopt a healthy white child, and if you are too “old” forget it. All of these celebrities who are adopting racially correct children are going to be in for a rude awakening in 10 -15 years.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE FAUX POST-RACIAL AMERIKA, BUT KEEPING UP WITH THE SCOTUS AND THE ABSOLUTE STREAK THEY HAVE BEEN ON, I PRESENT THE LATEST:

(Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a landmark victory for gay rights on Wednesday by forcing the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages in states where it is legal and paving the way for it in California, the most populous state.

As expected, however, the court fell short of a broader ruling endorsing a fundamental right for gay people to marry, meaning that there will be no impact in the more than 30 states that do not recognize gay marriage.

The two cases, both decided on 5-4 votes, concerned the constitutionality of a key part of a federal law, the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), that denied benefits to same-sex married couples, and a voter-approved California state law enacted in 2008, called Proposition 8, that banned gay marriage.

The court struck down Section 3 of DOMA, which limited the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman for the purposes of federal benefits, as a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under the law.

The ruling was a victory for President Barack Obama’s administration, which had decided two years ago it would no longer defend the law in court. Obama applauded the DOMA ruling and directed U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to review all relevant federal laws to ensure that it is implemented.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, 76, appointed to the court by Republican President Ronald Reagan in 1988, was the key vote and wrote the DOMA opinion, the third major gay rights ruling he has authored since 1996.

In a separate opinion, the court ducked a decision on Proposition 8 by finding that supporters of the California law did not have standing to appeal a federal district court ruling that struck it down. By doing so, the justices let stand the lower-court ruling that had found the ban unconstitutional.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the Proposition 8 opinion, ruling along procedural lines in a way that said nothing about how the court would rule on the merits. The court was unusually split, with liberals and conservatives in both the majority and the dissent.

By ruling this way on Proposition 8, the court effectively let states set their own policy on gay marriage. This means a debate is set to continue in various states via ballot initiatives, legislative action and litigation potentially costing millions of dollars on both sides of an issue that stirs cultural, religious and political passions in the United States as elsewhere.

The rulings come amid rapid progress for advocates of gay marriage in recent months and years. Opinion polls show a steady increase in U.S. public support for gay marriage.

‘SECOND-CLASS CITIZENS’

Gay marriage advocates celebrated outside the courthouse. A big cheer went up as word arrived DOMA had been struck down. “DOMA is dead!” the crowd chanted, as couples hugged and cried.

Paul Katami and Jeffrey Zarrillo, a gay couple from Burbank, California, who were two of the four plaintiffs in the Proposition 8 case, were both outside the courthouse.

“We are gay. We are American. And we will not be treated like second-class citizens,” Katami said.

He turned to Zarrillo, voice cracking and said: “I finally get to look at the man I love and say, ‘Will you marry me?'”

Before Wednesday, 12 of the 50 U.S. states plus the District of Columbia recognized gay marriage. Three of those dozen – Delaware, Minnesota and Rhode Island – legalized gay marriage this year. California would become the 13th state to allow it.

About a third of the U.S. population now lives in areas where gay marriage is legal, if California is included.

“We are a people who declared that we are all created equal, and the love we commit to one another must be equal as well,” Obama, the first sitting president to endorse gay marriage, said in a written statement.

While the ruling on DOMA was clearcut, questions remained about the meaning of the Proposition 8 ruling for California. Proposition 8 supporters vowed to seek continued enforcement of the ban until litigation is resolved. But California Governor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, said the justices’ ruling “applies statewide” and all county officials must comply with it.

“We are now faced with this unusual situation where we have some uncertainty,” said Andrew Pugno, one of the Proposition 8 proponents’ lawyers. He expressed satisfaction that the Supreme Court had “nullified” a San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that, if left intact, could have had set a precedent for other Western states in its jurisdiction.

FEDERAL BENEFITS

By striking down Section 3 of DOMA, the court cleared the way for legally married couples to claim more than 1,100 federal benefits, rights and burdens linked to marriage status.

Kennedy wrote for the majority that the federal law, as passed by Congress, violated the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection. “The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the state, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity,” Kennedy wrote.

The law imposed “a stigma upon all who enter into same-sex marriages made lawful by the unquestioned authority of the states,” he said.

Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia both wrote dissenting opinions in the DOMA case.

Roberts went out of his way to state that the court was not making any big pronouncements about gay marriage. The court, he said, did not have before it the question of whether states “may continue to utilize the traditional definition of marriage.”

Scalia accused the majority of ignoring procedural obstacles about whether the court should have heard the case in order to reach its desired result.

“This is jaw-dropping,” he said of Kennedy’s analysis.

As a result of the DOMA ruling, Edith Windsor of New York, who was married to a woman and sued the government to get the federal estate tax deduction available to heterosexuals when their spouses die, will be able to claim a $363,000 tax refund.

The ruling was a win also for more than 200 businesses, including Goldman Sachs Group, Microsoft Corp and Google Inc, that signed on to a brief urging the court to strike down DOMA. Thomson Reuters Corp, owner of the Reuters news agency, was another signatory.

“Today’s decisions help define who we are as a people, whether or not we are part of the group directly affected,” said Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman’s chief executive.

CHANGING LANDSCAPE

Numerous public figures including former President Bill Clinton, who in 1996 signed the DOMA law, and prominent groups including the American Academy of Pediatrics have come out this year in support of same-sex marriage and gay civil rights.

Individual members of Congress – Democrats and Republicans – also voiced new support for gay marriage this year.

Even with recent developments, there is still significant opposition among Republicans, including House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, who had ordered the House to intervene in the DOMA case in defense of the law. Boehner said in a statement he was “obviously disappointed in the ruling” and predicted that a “robust national debate over marriage” would continue.

While more developments lie ahead, the legal fight over gay marriage already constitutes one of the most concentrated civil rights sagas in U.S. history.

Just 20 years ago, the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that its state constitution could allow gay marriage, prompting a nationwide backlash and spurring Congress and a majority of states, including Hawaii, to pass laws defining marriage as between only a man and woman.

In 2003, when the top court of Massachusetts established a right to same-sex marriage under its constitution, the action triggered another backlash as states then adopted constitutional amendments against such unions. Five years later, the tide began to reverse, and states slowly began joining Massachusetts in permitting gays to marry.

FloridaCracker: Let’s ditch “Affirmative Action” while we’re at it.Since we’ve decided the community in question now is able enough to register to vote and perhaps acquire a picture ID AND get themselves to the polling place, preferably the one where they belong, perhaps we can take their training wheels off and let them get jobs on merit and education, not skin color, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or whatever else they’ve added to the mix over the years.

Dlanor: A corrupt Congress (instead of a corrupt Court) will now decide which Southern States should have the burden to prove they are full members of the union, such that they ought not be presumed to be saddled with more racists and bigots than are found in your typical, commie, open society, anti-american, blue state.

Another example of “Club Fed” ignoring the rule of law – and deeming the Constitution as being a living document to be re-interpreted by using social justice – thereby stripping the States of their rights.

Our federal government is totally out of control – this “Club Fed” has overstepped it’s charter and become a domestic enemy of the people. I can give you 90 trillion very good reasons why this is so.

Our founders are turning over in their graves, as are the millions who’ve given their lives in the name of freedom.

We could not keep our republic.

May God in Heaven damn Obama and his ilk to Hell.

replyJerry_Rigger: God doesn’t damn anyone in spite of Jeremiah Wright”s prayers. People damn themselves. The Kenyan is doing that job quite well on his own. Let’s pray he hastens the job. He can’t split those gates soon enough for American Patriots.

journey: The outcome of the last election was clearly shown by allowing low IQers the privilege to “vote”. “Voting” was determined by how large are the handouts. This is not how a democracy can be maintained. Of all the states, the South understood the blacks the best. They held the last line in this country in trying to keep it white majority. Now the country is run by idiots afraid of being called racists. There are millions more low IQers to be made “citizens” voting for more handouts.

Question Diversity: When thinking about this case, I put myself in the position of a Supreme Court judge. (Yeah, I know, from my mouth to Allah’s ears.)

The hypothetical me on SCOTUS would like to find for Miss Fisher, but I can’t think of any Federal Constitutional grounds to do so. Just between everyone reading these words and the gatepost, we all know that this Top 10% was done precisely as a seemingly non-racial end run around the concept of blatantly race-based AA, because we all know that the valedictorian of taco or ghetto high schools in Texas isn’t as worthy as someone from a difficult competitive white high school who finished one person below the top 10%. But what am I supposed to use as a rationale to find for Miss Fisher? Am I to use the doctrine of disparate impact? (Which the real SCOTUS will take up next term). Except I don’t think the disparate impact doctrine should even exist. If it shouldn’t exist to invalidate police and fire department entrance and promotion exams, then it shouldn’t exist to knock back this top 10% system either. The doctrine of strict scrutiny of racial classifications at law? First off, I think intermediate scrutiny should be used on race, and second, there are no racial classifications de jure in this case.

If there was some paper trail somewhere that proved that the authors of the top 10% policy specifically and explicitly did it because of race, then I suppose I could use strict scrutiny to declare it an illegitimate racial classification, if I was given to do that.

One more thing from SCOTUS: You’re reading a lot of hemming and hawing in the breaking news that SCOTUS borked the Voting Rights Act and namely the preclearance provisions. They did no such thing. All they did was order that the DOJ come up with a better, more timely more up-to-date formula on determining which jurisdictions have to do preclearance. They did NOT find the Federal government’s power to require preclearance of some jurisdictions but not all unconstitutional, much less find the whole notion of preclearance unconstitutional much less the whole VRA unconstitutional. IOW, in the heart of the matter, they found for the Feds/VRA.

BernieGoetzFan: It is amazing how this is happening at the same time as the amnesty. All these non-whites will get quotas, of course.Affirmative action really is forever now. Or at least until the Hispanics/Asians decide to stop giving quotas to blacks.

replySpartacus: -My people have suffered historical abuse at the hands of white racists.
-Wait a minute, didn’t you just jump the fence yesterday?
-Well…Erm… RACIST !

Funruffian: What is so blindingly pathetic about UT’s demographic is that Asians far outperform and earn their spots in the University in comparison to the overall residential population they hold. As Blacks get all of these assistant programs, AA quota privileges and racial preferences, they still make up less than half of the college campus in relation to the state’s Black population. If I were Asian I would be disgusted by the governmental support blacks receive who have hardly earned their admissions in relation to Asians.

Dan Roodt: Initially when the news came out yesterday, it looked for a moment as if the SCOTUS had moved a few inches away from endorsing race preferences, but Jared’s disillusioning commentary is by far the best I have read so far.

He is also correct about the University having all the funds and the time in the world to litigate against white individuals whom a few smaller non-profits might assist in trying to defend their rights.

The one thing that struck me in reading some of the arguments of Miss Fisher’s lawyer last year, was the typical tendency of lawyers to be cautious and not tackle the issue head-on. As far as I recall, he did not attack the notion of “diversity”, but simply argued that UT was already diverse enough not to exclude Abigail Fisher on racial grounds.

This also happens a lot here in South Africa where we have to fight name changes and language discrimination (against Afrikaans) in the courts. Ultimately, one gets a sense of “winning the battle but losing the war”. Sometimes a case is won on some technicality but the principle is left untouched.

If it makes sense at all to litigate against the state or huge institutions like universities, almost against all odds, one should attack the core principle, such as “diversity” or race preference itself. Even if the outcome is then negative, at least the hostility of the SCOTUS against whites would have been revealed, the emperor seen to be naked as it were.

As things stand now, the issue has been fudged and the lower court will probably keep it that way. So UT will just invent another another abstruse requirement to exclude whites without actually calling it racial.

Some time in the future demographics will change and white students will be a minority on campus. At that stage universities will not argue that they need more “diversity” in the form of white students, but the remaining whites will be punished for “past privileges” enjoyed by their parents and grandparents.

I strongly feel that universities with their “tenured radicals” are leading the way as far as the downfall of the West is concerned. There must be some way in which they can be boycotted or isolated in order to neutralise them.

Deciding not to decide – it’s a way for the Supreme Court to deal with a contentious issue by awaiting more clarifying opinions from the lower courts.

In a 7-1 decision regarding the closely watched affirmative action case Fisher v. University of Texas, the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the federal district court from which it came with instructions to give the matter greater scrutiny.

This is a partial victory for opponents of affirmative action because the lower court upheld the formula used by the university to admit minority candidates to its law school.

The court’s ruling on Fisher v. University of Texas was 7-1, with the majority opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, and Justice Elena Kagan, who was solicitor general when the Obama administration weighed in on the case, recused herself from the decision.

Justice Kennedy said the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals made legal errors when it upheld the university program. The lower court should have scrutinized the university program more strictly, Justice Kennedy said.

The justices were ruling on the case of Abigail Fisher, who alleged the university rejected her because she is white.

Justice Kennedy said the Supreme Court wants the lower court to hear the case again “so that the admissions process can be considered and judged under a correct analysis.”

UT gives automatic entry to any Texas student who graduates in roughly the top 10% of his or her high-school class. That program was designed to maintain ethnic and racial diversity after a 1996 federal-appeals-court ruling restricted affirmative action in Texas and nearby states.

But after 2003, when the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to reinstate affirmative action, UT quickly supplemented its top-10% plan with an additional admissions pathway that allowed consideration of race and other factors beyond grades and test scores. UT said that pathway was designed for middle- or upper-class children of African-American and Hispanic professionals who attend more competitive schools.

While the top-10% plan vastly expanded the number of Texas high schools sending graduates to the state’s flagship campus, UT administrators frowned at having to accept applicants from less competitive high schools, whose top students often had lower test scores and poorer academic preparation than middle-tier students from leading suburban high schools that traditionally served as the university’s principal feeders.

The university said the presence of better-off minority students could help dispel stereotypes that could be perpetuated by the presence of those admitted through the top-10% program.

The problem for the university is that it is seeking to redefine the very concept of affirmative action, and in so doing, make admission to the school race-based regardless of economic circumstance. In questioning the lawyers during oral arguments, Justice Kennedy and Justice Alito put it succinctly:

“I thought that the whole purpose of affirmative action was to help students who come from underprivileged backgrounds, but you make a very different argument that I don’t think I’ve ever seen before,” said Justice Samuel Alito.

“So what you’re saying is that what counts is race above all,” said Justice Kennedy, considered a swing vote on affirmative action. “You want underprivileged of a certain race and privileged of a certain race. So that’s race.”

Indeed. The 2003 decision Gutter v Bollinger said that race could be only one factor in admissions policies. The school’s effort at a work around that used both race and economic circumstances to admit minority students but discriminate against whites of the same economic background was at issue.

The lower court could re-issue a similar opinion, addressing the issues in a more technically pleasing way to the high court. Or, it could split a few more hairs and send it back to SCOTUS for a more definitive decision.

Either way, we have not seen the last of this case – or of challenges to affirmative action.

Wmn04Ken07: Cowards. This is not unexpected especially since Roberts kowtowed to Obama on Obama care. Everything will be decided on the politics of the day. Today it is immigration. Tomorrow will be gay marriage and so it goes. They may earn the reputation for being the scaredy cat court.

reply SFLBIB: Maybe they need to be scared of making another Dred Scott or Roe decision.

quote from article: “Either way, we have not seen the last of this case – or of challenges to affirmative action.”

As long as self-styled “liberals” and “progressives” remain in power, we’ll unavoidably see more hare-brained defenses of so-called “affirmative” action: skin color is far more important to people who pursue the politics of divide and conquer than the content of people’s character.

In sum, you can always count on leftists to do whatever will harm America.

reply Felini: Or, God forbid, academics should be a major factor in determining college entrance. Once upon a time in America, merit mattered.

reply SFLBIB: In view of the persistence and the very defiance of the law shown by the public university administrators who support this nonsense, minority protests against “racism” naturally come to be seen as a more productive activity than academic endeavor.

journey:The reality is that Asians are subjected to reverse discrimination. They excel even when recently arrived immigrants, barely speaking English. So all this so called discrimination against blacks just pure fantasy. Heck, these programs have been in existence for over 60 years. It is time to face reality, blacks/hispanics in general cannot compete on their own. So either these programs have to exist eternally or let the blacks/Hispanics compete on their own. This question will be settled when there is not enough whites to support this kind of nonsense.

reply SFLBIB: The problem all boils down to what Prof. Lino Graglia* said: “The many arguments once offered for racially preferential admission to institutions of higher education — biased tests, remedy, diversity, role models, etc. — have more recently come down to a single one: ‘We can’t have’ (i.e.,

Dlanor: Our betters are trying to force us to be less judgmental about race by requiring that our judgments be more rigorous in how race is factored. This is a circle that cannot be squared, no matter how strained the legal pretext. There are as many insoluables as there are solubles, but try telling that to law-objectifying, freedom-reducing, government-addicted Progs.

jdmeth: People want to go to “Prestige” universities so that they can have a prestige degree. How many of our presidents and federal judges went to Harvard? If you want equal opportunity only students who’s parents did not graduate from a prestige university should be allowed to attend one.

reply SFLBIB: Has no one explored the idea that if a student lacks academic credentials required at a top university, that he can go to a community college, establish his record, and then transfer to a four-year institution? NO. If the freshman class at a university doesn’t “look” like society, then minorities are not getting a college education, and racism is the problem, not a student’s lack of preparation. This is assumed true without a scintilla of evidence.

reply journey: Now they are heading toward the more extreme. Instead of looking at just race, more lower economic level students should be let in meaning more ghetto blacks and uneducated Hispanics (gangs). It’s like let’s see how far we can push insanity.It is written in little barrycare that more Hispanics and blacks have to be admitted to medical schools. Now it really heading toward dangerous territory.

I HAVE TO WONDER WHY HE WOULD PUBLISH THIS E-BOOK JUST BEFORE THE TRAIL. PERSONALLY I THINK ZIMMERMAN WILL SKATE AND WE BLACK FOLK WILL MARCH. IF NOT MARCH WE’LL BURN DOWN OUR OWN SHIT. I HAVE NO DESIRE HIDDEN OR SEEN TO CUT AND PASTE THIS ARTICLE. I JUST WANT YOU TO SEE WHAT THEY ARE SAYING.

THEY SAID:

nickcarraway: It won’t hurt his son. Probably most of the trayvon supporters have never read a book and never will.

Mike Dehart: Considering that Martins mother has been trying to trademark aanything she can to make money off of this and the spin from the media trying to portray Zimmerman as a racist it is not suprising that Z’s father is trying to get their message out.

The media wants to paint its own narrative of the Trayvon Martin case, and assumes, possibly correctly, that you are too lazy, stupid, and frightened of being called a racist to investigate matters for yourself and find out the truth. The picture the media wants you to believe about this case are like the two images in the PM story for a few days ago. Its a story in which a mean-faced George Zimmerman guns down a tiny, babyfaced honor roll student named Trayvon Martin. Which isnt true.

Ivaylo Milenkov:Black caucus? Is there a White caucus? Latino caucus? What about an Asian caucus? Shouldn’t politicians represent their voters regardless of race? The Augusta people were called sexist for allowing only women, what would the Black caucus be called if it’s exclusive to blacks?

Cleverly Named Prod.: Exactly just how much a of a piece of human garbage would Trayvon have to turn out to be before you in-denial fucktards realize how fucking wrong you are? Little thug starting shit gets physical with a man in a gun trying to reduce crime in his neighborhood. This kid was a piece of shit thug. End of story. Fuck trayvon Martin and fuck every single black kid like him. Fuck this hip-hop thug culture and fuck every godforsaken white man laughing his way to the bank with record sales.

Schlub McDonald: Sorry, fellow Liberals. I jump off the train when it comes to this particular case. Zimmerman should be found NOT guilty. If he went trolling for Mr. Martin and killed Martin in cold blood, then yes – punishable to the fullest extent of the law, added hate crime to boot. But, this was definitely not the case. Mr. Martin was the aggressor and completely facilitated the unfortunate circumstances that led to his death – irrelevant of what Zimmerman’s father spouts off like an inconsiderate nitwit.

Yesterday, I talked about how John Derbyshire’s “advice” to White parents on what to say to their kids about black people was the right idea with the wrong messenger. You can see my column here.

And while Derbyshire’s racist suggestions got him fired from the National Review it doesn’t mean that most White parents out there are doing a particularly good job to talking to thier kids about race.

So, I know you’ve all been waiting patiently to see … drum roll please:

The Talk for White Parents to their White Kids about Black People

In this day and age of Black presidents, a Black First Lady that still makes a White man’s head explode and George Zimmerman killing a defenseless Trayvon Martin in cold blood, you’ll need it. It will come in handy White people, so read carefully. Don’t just open for emergencies, depending on what’s an emergency to you. But, this should work for:

1) The first time your kid asks why there’s a Black history month

2) The first time they come to you asking about the word “nigger;” and

3) Just about any other time you’re stumped by a Black/White race issue and don’t know what to say.

Dear White son or daughter [INSERT NAME HERE], here’s what you need to know:

1) Black People and White people are different but that doesn’t mean one is better than the other. Black people look different, often eat different foods, communicate and socialize in ways that may seem strange or odd for you. But just because something is different doesn’t mean it’s bad, or that the way you do things is better. Always remember that.

2) If you don’t know something about Black people ask a lot of them. Your Black friends don’t speak for all Black people. It’s perfectly okay to not know something, because honestly unless you ask every Black person in America you really don’t know. Do you?

3) White People as a group have done terrible things to Blacks in this country – and just because they are black (not to mention Asians, Latinos and American Indians). This is a fact. You may not be personally responsible but you benefit from this fact and therefore have some responsibility. No: you never enslaved anybody, neither did your mother or I, but lots of White people did. Once slavery was over, White people spent about 100 years mistreating Blacks because they couldn’t figure out how to send them all home after that whole nation-building thing. This means that Black people used to get killed just for trying to vote, weren’t allowed to live where they wanted to, and even today some White people refuse to hire Blacks just because they are black. And while those types of things are illegal, people still do it. You benefit from this. So before you ever judge a Black person remember that other White people worked for centuries to make sure you’d be okay and Black people would stay poor.

4) Saying “nigger” is the same thing as saying “bitch.” Even though you may hear it in music, or with your friends at school you know perfectly well that you shouldn’t use that word regardless of who is in earshot. And really, why is it so important to use it anyway?

5) Always remember there is a difference between a Black neighborhood, a bad neighborhood and a poor neighborhood. Just because an area has lots of Black people doesn’t mean they’re poor or that there’s lots of crime. There are plenty of places where black people live that are nicer than our neighborhood. You should avoid any group of people that seem dangerous because of their behavior or activities, whether that’s in a trailer park or an inner city ghetto. You can get robbed by anybody.

6) No matter who your sister/brother has dated, or what your friends have told you, or how many episodes of Chappelle Show you’ve watched you do not KNOW Black people. Who or what you listen to, read, or sleep with does not make you Black. Acting like you know everything about Black people because you have some Black friends or enjoy rap music is ignorant.

7) Black people are not pets, so don’t touch them without permission, or change your voice when you’re around them, or worse: automatically try to set them up with any Black person you know. This never works out. If you’re curious about their hair just ask, you’d be amazed at some of the stuff Black folks hear all day.

8) And finally: the best way to get along with Black people is to not be oblivious. Nothing annoys Black people more than White people who pretend racism doesn’t exist and then proclaim ignorance in the face of overwhelming evidence. Just because you don’t see it, or don’t want to see it, doesn’t mean Black people are paranoid or making things up. If you think about lesson 3 you should be good on this.

I know this talk has made you uncomfortable, but your mother/father and I believe that it’s better for you to hear this at home than learning about it on the streets or from your friends. Now go out to the park and make some Black friends! But just promise me you won’t cut through those trailer parks. I heard those people are all single moms and sell crystal meth.

THEY SAID:

JOEY: That’s a big load of guilt, don’t you think?

reply kevin: YES! IT ALMOST SAYS BOW TO THEM. JUST THREAT THEM LIKE EVERYONE!

reply Peter: It’s way more than that………… it’s a huge racist article. I am sick and tired of listening to the blacks… Ohh, excuse me, African Americans, bitch about us whites (I mean European Americans) ruining their lives. Never and I mean NEVER have I heard one black person thank ME for freeing their great, great….. grandpappy from the southern slavers. My family’s blood lay in the dirt of America as family MEMBERS (PLURAL) died to free the south and all the blacks who were held there. I am sick and tired of listening to this perpetual bullshit about racism when it’s NOT the white person who perpetuates this “problem.” It’s the black culture of our country who does so and does so as it gets them something for nothing, or at least for less. ALL people in this country have the same opportunities. If a person wishes to stand back and hold out his/her hand instead of working, then of course you will continue to work for “us white folk” for generations to come. In closing, I am a HUGE fan of Dr. Martin Luther King and for years now I have felt sorry for all he and his family gave up for the likes of today’s current black (oppps, African American) population. GET OFF THE RACIST wagon and get to work, like the rest of us!!!!!

Debra: From what I have learned in my life of 53 years, I seriously think the race thing is promoted by whomever it benefits at the moment. Speaking from my heart, black people are created by the same God that created the rest of the people on this earth, whether they be black, white, Indian, Asian, Chinese, or one of the other races that exist.It seems that there are only a handful of whites that are truly racist and would resort to violence against them because of their skin color and visa versa.Having said that, one cannot help but notice that the majority of race assaults in this country are blacks assaulting whites. Occasionally, you hear of a white assaulting a black but again it is rare. Now it may or may not have been true back 100 or 200 years ago, I suspect most of the stories were true but I also suspect that we have not been told the whole story. Frankly, judging by the information that is allowed to be made known through our media today, none of us really know what percentage of white assaults on blacks were a result of personal hatred or politically motivated.Everyone can see clearly that our current president is one who uses race to advance his political agenda. From where I sit, he is instigating violence every time he jumps to a conclusion regarding a matter when black and white both are involved. He is developing an official record that the entire world is witness to.How many reports were there of white men preventing people from voting in the 2008 election? How many reports about Black Panthers were reported about standing outside polling places threatening people that wanted to go and vote? What did our Attorney General do about it? Nothing. But if the situation were reversed, the white men would of been crucified. That is racist by our own governments and media.

Debra:Racism is promoted by our own governments. …For the record the man that shot Travyon Martin was not White as the media tries to suggest, he is Hispanic. Wonder why the media has not corrected this error? Why is it social taboo to tell white kids how to behave when they find themselves in unfamiliar territory where harm could come their way, but the same rule and acceptance is not expected toward blacks? Is that a double standard?Why are their black colleges and not white colleges? Why are their black political groups but not white ones? Why is there a NAACP but no equivalent for white people?Those all are examples of corrupt and demented thinking on the part of our leaders.It would not offend me if black parents instructed their children to be careful around certain white groups. Seriously, unless I’m guilty of committing the crimes it does not bother me in any way. It may be sound advice! Who am I to say? The same holds true for whites and being given sound warnings to keep themselves from harm. What black parent out there would be offended in that? Their own black children could be harmed by these black thugs…who can SAY?Sheeish! Check yourselves media! Are you all racist in secret? Why else the double standards and taboo. Black people are just as intelligent as white people. They are also just as human and able to understand right from wrong, good and bad, and just and unjust. Black and White both breathe the same air and occupy the same geography, they are not as different as the government and media like to portray them!

ONLY FOR CONTEXT BECAUSE OF THE REPLY THAT FOLLOWS

reply OhYes: The reason that there are black colleges and the NAACP is because blacks continue to struggle in american whether you see it or not and at the end of the day we depend on each other to lift one another up and keep our people rising. White people are priviledge and life is a lot easier for them than it is for a black people.

reply shane: are you retarted? you obviously live under a rock you see i live in the real world and i can tell you right now what i just read couldn’t be furthest from the truth. i grew up around niggers, i know how they act even the young kids have no manners no class and when you say niggers are just as intelligent as white ppl it has been scientifically proven that they our not!!! so you need to get your facts straight! so go ahead and let your children around them 1 of 3 things are going to happen your kids will want to act like a dumb nigger, we already see that transpiring today they will end up in jail over something to do with a dumb nigger, or they will end up dead!!! niggers are not like white ppl period!!!!

reply kevin: yes this happens but from both sides, what do you think when they say “white b!tch” ? still they only care about the poor black side, its deficience on equality that causes this.leave alone the crime and violence

wllie Lynch: you didnt mention that every year 30,000 white women are raped by blacks, and zero black women are raped by whites, If thats not enough, then how about blacks are 7times more likely to murder you than whites . Stay away from them, they are sub animals.

ShayNayNayNot: Of course this was written by an uppity Apefirmative Action colored boy who does not know its place and is playing the race card and blame YT in typical groid fashion. This house boy needs some time in fields to learn its place. There is no such thing as “black people” and there never will be. The are a filthy, diseased and parasitic sub-species that would of gone extinct through natural selection long ago if it was not for the race traitor coon coddler, enablers and panderers. What our precious human children need to be taught is that coloreds are a danger to human society and humans as a whole. For 13% of the US population they are 67% of the prison population, 59% of the AIDS and STDs population, etc. Coloreds rape, rob and murder, not necessarily in that order, defenseless humans for no reason whatsoever. They rape their three day old sprogs and kill their mates. Here is what I taught my children: Stay the f*ck away from these dangerous animals at all costs. Do not “befriend” them or even speak with them. They know that bestiality is a sin against God and nature and they would rather be dead than have a groid touch them. Jim Crow laws and segregation must be reinstated immediately to keep humans safe. BTW: Trayvon aka Lil Skittles was not defenseless and murdered. He was made good in self defense as he attacked Mr. Zimmerman. Mr. Zimmerman is a hero alongside James Earl Ray and Bernie Geotz. Read more about groid crime, what they do to humans and Lil Skittles at chimpmania.

wllie Lynch: these animals will rape you and murder you while they make your loved one watch, then do the same to you and not blink or lost a minutes sleep, If this is the kind of animal you want your daughter to go out with, then you are lost to anyone, You are a credible insane person, Be smart, avoid the groid, say NO to the colored, say NO, no matter what,, for the truth go to chimpmania.com for the truth

reply debc2: EVERYBODY is over the racial guilt thing. I do not buy in to it. This country needs it’s citizens to work and pay taxes. As many as we can get. Welfare is not an occupation. I am white but believe me I have seen racism. Black people hate us because we were born white. We did not get to choose our birth color a bit more than anyone of any color so stop trying to get people of ANY color to feel bad or guilty about their color. One key thing you need to know about white people……..We are so over it. I do not like or dislike you because of your color. I do not feel sorry for you because of your color. I do not think you are entitled to free stuff because of your color. I don’t need to spend all my free time trying to figure you out because of your color. I recognize our differences but most of all I recognize the fact that we are all human beings with differences. I don’t owe anybody anything because of their color and as for the colors that do feel entitled because of their color, well you are holding yourself exactly where you are. Dependent on a government that don’t give a crap about your well being or mine.

ALWAYS PAY CLOSE ATTENTION WHEN YOU SEE THE NUMBERS 88 OR 14. THE 88 STANDS EIGHTH LETTER OF THE ALPHABET WHICH IS H AND TWO H’S TOGETHER STAND FOR HEIL HITLER. THE 14 STANDS FOR THE 14 WORDS RACIST HOLD DEAR: WE MUST SECURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR PEOPLE AND A FUTURE FOR WHITE CHILDREN. YEAH, LIKE THAT’S NOT ALREADY TAKING PLACE BY DEFAULT.

CritcalMass88:Well put! This is so very ture! Black on white crimeI has been supressed by the media for generations. However, if the opposite is to occur, and it does from time to time, that’s all we hear about from the disinformedia! Being a victim of black crime, more than once I can tell you things are not getting better. But you seem well informed and I’m sure you know this already. Thank God for the internet! More people are speaking about these atrocities and someday, it will not be able to be avoided…Like the big, black, gorillia in the room that it is!

Hmooney: This is directed at the author of this article: Okay, read this and disagree with one thing. What is the purpose of a white parent telling their white child that even though they haven’t done anything wrong, they are benefiting from someone else’s wrongdoing? Are you actually suggesting that parents should instill undeserved guilt into their children? In reverse that would be like publishing an article recommending that black parents should tell their black children that in the past, some black people have done very bad things, committed very bad crimes, and don’t get mad if people are suspicious of you. And don’t give me the all black people haven’t committed crimes stuff. I know that. Just like all white people didn’t own slaves. I don’t think ANY child should ever have the baggage of someone else’s sin lain on their shoulders. I do like the fact that this is actually being discussed, instead of BOTH sides having a ‘you should read my mind and know what I expect’ attitude. it is especially helpful for those of us who don’t look like they fit completely in either world, and are rejected by some in both. As for the ignorant and racists remarks in these comments. Pffft asses like to hear themselves bray.

willie hunter: the only thing that will change all of us gay, straight, black, white, indian, jap etc. is the day we look up and some space mother fucker starts mowing us down with a force we have never seen before and we have to fight shoulder to shoulder to send those space niggers back to were the fuck they come from. and untill that day comes, we will continue to fight eachother.

Kay K. Kaye: NIGGERS are stupid, lazy, parasitic, violent, brutish SUBHUMANS. Plus, they FUCKING STINK! The only credible scientific evidence that exists (that has not been suppressed) suggests that they might not even be human beings.

Unless you just landed here on earth from another planet, or are MENTALLY RETARDED, you should have by now deduced these irrefutable facts.

Sara:Are you serious? We benefitted from it? Blacks, unqualified and uneducated benefit from affirmative action and racebait and ridicule whites. The benefit from their hatred. Fill companies full of unqualified blacks and run the companies into the ground.

How dare you try to fill children full of guilt. You are a monster. Why don’t you teach black kids not to have a chip on their shoulders and not to blame others for generations of apathy.

I am shocked that you would be willing to say out loud that blacks can’t succeed without white people making allowances. That’s pathetic.

shane: i don’t want my innocent white children around a bunch of dumb niggers, what i lie to my kids about how niggers act fuck that!!! niggers are the worst race they are uneducated, they have no respect whatsoever no regard for man’s laws, they are lazy, yell when they talk! “talk like dis nigga ya dawg”! they are violent unpredictable they are sponges mooching off decent hard working whites or the white devil according to them! yet we pay OUR taxes to pay for there fucking welfare an food stamps! for those that choose not to believe it or live in denial the facts are all right their in front of you, niggers should not SHOULD not be equal to white people period.

Joe Ma: I’m Asian and even I can’t agree with your guilt inducing article. And frankly, most traditional Hispanics and Asian parents are more in line with Derbyshire’s view than yours. They will NOT let their kids date Blacks or bring Blacks home. There’s 4 groups in America now, and while they all have a certain amount of animosity for each other, they all dislike Blacks the most (especially the Blacks who made it out of the ghetto and they know the only way to give their kids a chance at life is to move to a less black neighborhood). Its really not because of the color of their skin, personally, for I have met African immigrants who made a success of themselves and interacting with them is a joy. Its the African-Americans whose unrelenting complaining and blaming others for stuff they are doing that I can’t stand.

I promise you, no one would dislike blacks if more of them (some exists…but like 5% of blacks or less ) earned top grades, talked properly, stop killing over little things (and makes it on the news, which reinforces the idea of the violent black), and just please stop complaining and blaming to everyone who would listen.

1) Around blacks NEVER relax.2) There is no country on the planet that is run by blacks and is prosperous.3) No matter what you do to try and appease blacks , they will only demand more.4) Blacks are not interested in equal RIGHTS, just equal RESULTS.5) Blacks have only ONE thought in their primitive brains. MUH DIK6) Blacks are on this planet for one purpose, to destroy.7) You are 10 times more likely to experience violence at the hands of a black.8) Treat blacks like you would a wild animal. There may be some tame ones, but most would eat you alive.

Ken: That is some excellent satire. I’m glad it finally got released. I’m sure as these children grow older these celebrities will rue the day they adopted them. Serves them right.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NeverEvrLand:Only the “tribe” can get away with comedy like that and that was comedy gold in my book. Too bad that white people can’t make humorous observations about white guilt and liberal celebrities because that would be the most target rich environment ever seen.

This issue points out one of the rare instances that I find myself in agreement with the majority of black people who find the adoption of their kin by whites to be abhorrent. They seem to , at a very basic level, understand how unnatural the whole “black baby” trend is and are not afraid to openly criticize it.

It seems most of those adopting these little bantu bundles of joy are older white women who apparently didn’t get the memo that when you are a single, middle-aged , career-obsessed woman who can no longer bear children you simply add to the kitty collection.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

anonymous:Seems every ad on TV,magazines,newspapers,etc.have some kind of black.Shampoo ads give us a break as they use different products. This year I notice Father’s Day ads with blacks and their kids in business attire or hardhats.What a joke.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Eric:Well we all know that those Hymieweird “stars” are all about keeping their name in print, and we all know that white libtards view non-Whites, especially Blacks, as their pets. Trouble is when “black baby” grows up into “urban youth/yufe.” You know damn well “black baby” is raised by a nanny and people like Madonna, Brangelina, and others will be out of the spotlight when “black baby” thugz out. So they’ll just let someone else like the prison system deal with their “former black babies.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

xXmyxxmastaXx:damn niggers

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

hdk468mm17:Lol, disgusting niggers. inb4 this gets taken down by butthurt cultural marxist liberals.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CampCarforLife:Anything to bring down the white man.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ProNorden:I know “Good help is hard to find” , but you shouldn’t have to ‘grow your own’.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

skiney85:Whites bringing blacks over from Africa… this seems familiar for some reason..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

hillary newman:TMZ….LMAO… KEEP UP THE FUNNY WORK.. MR I’m A LAWYER!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

d3321ck:if i ever get rich i plan on collecting a few black babies myself, to improve my imagine with work piers and such.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Johnny Nicholas:Best keep that receipt in case black baby goes “muh dick” and try to save up for a white one

Poe56: I believe that most black people are gifted with extra muscles and an ability to accept large doses of body enhancing pills/liquids …..So, then would this not create a new “field of sports’ where black people are pitted against black people only? Nothing bad with what I’m saying only a thought .. Maybe, just maybe there is something here that we have not really wanted to look at because ………….Oh, god forbid we say something racist. This is not racist..this is what is most possibly a truth. Now , not all may be gifted like this but certainly all Black Athletes are! …. and the Sport Association of the world should really look at this ….Look at Basketball, Football, ‘Tennis’, Track…. Black Athletes are obviously superior to Caucasian Athletes I would say the statement holds true 90% of the time ….Why can’t this be addressed? It would make them physically superior ? We are not addressing the ‘brain’ ….just the physical aspect of the actual body in Sport. I don’t mind thinking that black people are more ‘prone to sport’ … it is very obvious! However, isn’t it a bit unfair of a competition?

ike55: Seriously media??? How can anyone give any praise to the Williams brothers, um sisters, for their athletic achievements? They have more PED’s flowing through their veins than most pro football or baseball players. Maybe tennis will consider drug testing some day. And by testing, I mean the kind of testing that will detect substances before the athlete can mask or purge them from their systems. Apparently, no pro sport is in a position to do so because interest would take a decline and with it, big profits.