Tuesday, February 21, 2017

MEDIA ALERT - Milo Yiannopoulos Press Conference In New York City Tuesday, February 21 2017 at 3pmMilo Yiannopoulos will be making his first on-camera comments to press regarding the recent controversy over statements Milo made during Joe Rogan and Drunken Peasants podcasts. Questions will be taken following a statement.Live stream is here.
Transcript of the full statement.
Mike Cernovich has some relevant advice:

Treat a PR crisis like a life-or-death fight.

Milo had escaped so many attacks. His Facebook response last night was inadequate. He should have been live streaming on all platforms getting his message out.

When #Pussygate happened, Trump listened to me by posting a video rather than doing press conferences. Trump waited too long, actually, and should have got ahead of the narrative.

When a PR crisis hits, treat it like a life-or-death event. Get on every available platform. Call your friends. Get on their podcasts. Do not let a narrative involving something like Nazism or pedophilia take form.“Remember people on the way up, you’ll see them on the way down.”

Milo has done a great job at staying in touch with his base of supporters. He has a platform larger than most in traditional media. Today is a reminder why you must build your own platforms and own audience. Will Milo have a show on Fox this year? No. Will he still have a larger audience than most people in media? Yes.Take good care of your friends as your platform grows.

As some people rise into the mainstream, they promote their friends and those who helped build them up less and less. This is a mistake, as when you hit a ceiling (see above), those are the people who are going to find energy to support you. If you don’t actively work to take care of them, they won’t find the energy needed to engage in a full-throttled defense of you.

Most people won’t have your back.

During a time of crisis, you’re mostly going to be on your own. Get used to it, don’t be bitter when people don’t defend you. Even if you’ve had the backs of others, expect them to be “too busy” in your time of need.

Will be interesting to see how he plays this. Hoping he lures them with the expectation of an apology only to relentlessly pummel them. Hoping he had a conversation with the powers that be at Breitbart and got their backing. The steam out of this press conference could be dissipated if they fire him immediately following it. I guess that is me assuming he isn't going to announce that he is leaving Breitbart to start his own platform.

I expect the initial satisfaction of the hit from those who organized it must be fading into concern right about now. The "script" for the right for the last sixty years is for Milo to tearfully apologize on camera today and slink away from public life. Gotta pretty good feeling that's not the plan here.

This strategy has ended careers for a long time now. It's a net loss for them if he loses popularity over all but gains credibility and popularity right where they don't want it. If this fails to end his career is at the very least a sign of unprecedented weakness for them.

I have no sympathy for those who cower before the enemy and attack their own ranks. Those who sit and wait for the first chance to shoot anyone on their side whom they deem not to be an immaculate and perfect saint without flaws.

There are no saints on this side of life, and instead of bowing to your enemies and doing EXACTLY what they want you to do, you would do well to take the banner and lead the charge straight into the enemy territory - just like Milo always did. That's why they are so scared of him.

I have not been a big fan of Milo's, but now is no time for that. I understood from a poster here that at one of his previous appearances, he was going to talk about Pedogate, but a call from DC stopped him. I hope he uses this moment in the spotlight to shatter the media silence about Pedophilia, coverup and blackmail amongst the powerful, connected and corrupted. With all of the media there,so they can't later play the 'We didn't know!" defense.

Je Suis Milo.

He is the victim of a terror attack. I stand with him. I hope he shoots back, and gets a big pile of the f*@kers.

Milo should announce that he will still give the keynote, in the same time slot, on live streaming. Let the viewer count chips fall where they may. Which will probably be two or more orders of magnitude in Milo's favor.

The best form of defence is attack: in my far more limited skirmishes with the left I find that they back off when they realise that you are not going to be taken down quietly and indeed are going to attack them.

What he defends is that sexual maturity is not something that happens the very same day the law says, so sometimes a person can be sexually mature while the law says otherwise. Of course, the law establishes a boundary because there has to be a boundary, but some people are more mature and some are less.

He's not talking about fucking kids, dear god. He's talking about how some people mature sexually before the legal boundary, and he's using himself as an example.

And I think we need the law to establish a clear boundary and to respect it, the same we do with speed limits. But it's not the same to talk about a 17 years old than a 7 years old. It's NOT the same at all. And it's disturbing how the left is trying to make it look the same.

So what you will about the left ,unless their members entirely leave the reservation and become traitors to the cause - they don't stab them in the back. For the right to succeed loyalty will need to become front and center. Those who are disloyal must be viewed as worse than the opposition and treated as such.

@18 EXACTLY! People are blatantly lying about Milo's comments. The lie then becomes a reality embraced by Jane and Joe "Six Packs" because they never bother to do the reading.

I've been asking folks to identify something Milo said which endorses pedophilia and they either fail to respond or they point out something that does not indicate an endorsement of pedophilia in any meaningful way.

At some point during this unfolding drama, I started asking "Wait, what exactly did he say?" I read transcripts, watched videos, and read his FB posts. There was nothing in those to support the idea that Milo supports pedophilia. In fact, the opposite is true. The people who are spreading this are either liars or have no clue what they are talking about.

Truer words have never been spoken. Despite all of the posturing - the left hates real confrontation. The right are the producers, inventors, honest builders of wealth . We hold the higher ground. The leftist vermin have no leg to stand on and bring only theft and destruction to the table. In light of that they must be dealt with accordingly. With derision and accorded no mercy. Practiced constituently over time - the right will bury these fuckers in the dustbin of history. Future historians will hold up their ideas as the ravings of mentally ill lunatics.

And Mark Dice was an astonishing disappointment. Oh, and Baked Alaska joined the pile on as well. I have no idea what Dice's deal is but Baked Alaska seems a non-talent who is desperately trying to avoid getting a job at the post office by "keeping his name out there" in order build internet fame into income.

And where dafuq is breitbart.com? At any given day, they had about a half dozen pink highlighted Milo stories on their front-page. A couple hours ago, there was still ONE minor (pink highlighted) story towards the very bottom of the front-page, but now all pink has been purged from www.breitbart.com.

The topical sub-page www.breitbart.com/milo/ still is up, albeit with last story from Sunday. Nothing younger than 2 days old "news" there.

I read Breitbart because Milo. Not the other way around. I hope they (of all people!) don't chicken out.

On the one hand it has always been a pleasure to watch as Milo forced the Left to tie itself into knots trying to both defame the spirit of the message while simultaneously celebrating his diversity cred.

The problem with a Milo- and one that is clearly missed by most- is that he was never what people seem to have taken him for. He's not conservative, not pro-Western, not a defender of civilization, per-se. He positioned himself to be a grand vizer of the emergent anti-kakistocracy by being a prime example of all that it opposed. His single most important contribution was his ability to cause such epic meltdowns within the discordant tribes of Marxist scalawags that serve as foot soldiers to the Deep State. Good, but not enough.

As they say in the Marines, this is not the hill you want to die on,regardless of how badly you wish to remain principled allies.

As they say in the Marines, this is not the hill you want to die on,regardless of how badly you wish to remain principled allies.

Bullshit.

Milo faced down riots to say things that other supposed right-wingers should have said, but were afraid of saying. He used his 'diversity' credentials in the appropriately cynical way. It wasn't that he 'caused epic meltdowns' that was the value - it was that he was willing to say things (critiques of feminism, of Islam, of the media, and more) that would cause those meltdowns, refuse to apologize, and refuse to back down.

Do the marines have a saying that goes 'Scamper and abandon your allies if they aren't valuable enough and it gets too hot'? 'Sometimes pussing out due to bad, lying is the right thing to do'?

My money is still on the number that this hysteria blows up in their faces.

We're dealing with crazy women, and they deal in spite not strategy. They wage a life of petty battles, each seems to them life or death for their spot in the female hierarchy, long term thinking is not applicable in any manner.

Been reading Psalms. One thing that stuck out in this read-through, the enemies David complains most bitterly about were previously his friends. Many still publicly supported him but worked privately to undermine him. Put simply they lied about him, repeatedly. There was an impression the rhetorical battle took more of a toll than the physical.

None of this is new. It's how the enemy, the spirit of the enemy, the adversary, always operates.

He isn't your ally anymore than a mosquito is just because it causes your opponents discomfort. He is a deeply damaged guy who delights in his own ego at the expense of all else. That's why the word "flamboyant" has always been associated with homosexuals- they live on the energy produced by outrage. He feeds on your righteous indignation in the same way he feasts on SJW tears.

FWIW at this moment Milo is winning, I've clicked thru the links at IGN and Drudge and Milo is winning and will win today at his news conference. If he follows Cerno's advice and shows the love for his base he will win bigger, he will crush them.

And for the little girl conservatives, what assclowns. Sure it is one thing to mention Milo's flaws but acting like gossipy little girls, pathetic.

Tip: If any of you conservatives cared about the Boy Scout headmaster issue you have been given a weapon, but per usual conservatives are morons who react to what the Left tells them to react to and that is that.

Now I remember, backstabbing-shitbird, One-Way, Buddy-fucker, Ten-Percenter and Light in the Ass Cheese-Dick all of which I have been forcefully reminded of in the last 24 hours, when reading comments by the dump Milo crowd.

But I don't remember hearing the hill one as a regular thing until I started reading Conservative commentators.

Was surprised to see styxhexenhammer666 do a full on character assassination of Milo, though he back pedaled a bit in the comments. As for Rogan iirc he got famous doing Girls Gone Wild type videos. Claims cred for being an cannabis and DMT enthusiast, basically an alt-SJW phony.

@Cataline SergiusNow I remember, backstabbing-shitbird, One-Way, Buddy-fucker, Ten-Percenter and Light in the Ass Cheese-Dick all of which I have been forcefully reminded of in the last 24 hours, when reading comments by the dump Milo crowd.

@19 I don't think Joe Rogan cares enough about what happens to Milo to defend him. At the very most he may claim Milo has always been a provocateur and this was a part of the shtick. He also had Gavin McInnes on his show and was down-right juvenile in his disdain for Gavin. I wouldn't count on Joe to do anything that may upset his comedy store buddies.

@58 This isn't a tactic to "learn" the left anything. They never learn. This is a war for the minds of the Normies, the people out there whose opinions wax and wane on the strength of a meme or headline. It's for the ones who get disgusted at the thought of pedophilia (like all reasonable people should.) The most effective way to counter an attack is to show that the attacker has condoned the very same behavior (or worse) in another instance. This completely pulls the rug out from under any moral grandstanding. It's the reason why Salon pulled their pro-pedo stories. They know this is their undoing.

I keep seeing this expression "overton window." I had to look it up, and I am glad I did. I thought it had something to do with computer technologies or printers and cartridges. Ha-ha, but no. In fact, it's a very useful idea.

We all know the Left in DC and Hollywood (Weiner, Podesta,Polanski, Bryan Singer, whoever Corey Haim and Feldman are referencing) they are the actual pedophiles. This should all be incredibly easy to turn around on them, which is what always happens. (No voter fraud! No terrorism from Immigrants! No problems in Sweden!)

The way pussygate worked out I think TRUMP released the footage. He took out a future Bush's political career & looked like an alpha at the same time. All the cucks saying they never grabbed any pussy was a bonus. Puberty is not the same for everyone, for niglets 23% of girls hit puberty at 7 and 44% at 8yo, everyone else is older in the order of declining crime rates. Dieversity is why the same laws don't fit 3rd worlders as they are based off of norms. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/38600414/ns/health-childrens_health/t/growing-too-soon-puberty-strikes--year-old-girls/#.WKxUtuQiyUk

And Mark Dice was an astonishing disappointment. Oh, and Baked Alaska joined the pile on as well. I have no idea what Dice's deal is

I suspect it involved cocaine and a boy

'This is not the hill you want to die on."

SO leave a bunch of hemlock infused 40oz on the hill for the journalists at the press conference.

Now I remember, backstabbing-shitbird, One-Way, Buddy-fucker, Ten-Percenter and Light in the Ass Cheese-Dick all of which I have been forcefully reminded of in the last 24 hours, when reading comments by the dump Milo crowd.

But I don't remember hearing the hill one as a regular thing until I started reading Conservative commentators.

For modern conservatives, there is no hill worth dying on. That is why they have lost.

Never understood the fag-hagging of the alt right with Milo. Queers are never your ally in anything because they are only driven by their own selfish need for attention and affirmation.

But he is quite entertaining. Watching him make Larry Wilmore and the 1,000 lb nog chip on his shoulder losing his sh@t over Milo essentially calling him a stupid jig on Bill Maher's show was awesome.

And he could use this presser as a way to force Pizzagate into the limelight.

What I don't get is why anyone would be upset at the CPAc disinvite? Cpac and Aipac have been nothing but cuck festivals for years. They should starved of any attention from the alt right and others.

And thank God for the great Cernovich!!!! Trump would never have made it without him and his sage advice. We don't give Mike enough credit for his work. Without him Trump would have lost, his victory had nothing to do with the white middle class being told they were pieces of sh@t for the past 40 years by the elites and shitskins, it was all Cernovich's doing.

"If only Breitbart would throw in their support as well... it's a damn shame they folded like that."

That's the real disappointment here. They should have had front page articles on the pedo culture of the Left, the scrubbing of sites like Salon and HuffPo before they posted Milo attack articles, and so on. You couldn't ask for a more target rich environment if the rap community suddenly started supporting feminism.

I'll keep on fighting, but it's hard to avoid the negative whispers in one's mind. If even a powerhouse site like Breitbart folds like a cheap suit from Tijuana, what the fuck is a nobody like me wasting my time for?

I listened to this video. He is not pro-pedophilia. But still, it is not OK, in my opinion, for an adult in his 20ies to have a sexual relationship with a 13-year old child. 13-year olds are just not mature enough, no matter what he says. He said that he learned a lot from the priest who molested him, but this might be an example of the Stockholm syndrome, and this reminded me very much of the Ancient Greek ethos regarding the adult-adolescent relationships.

This is a fragment from a Greek vase they have at the Ashmolean Museum that represents man-boy love. Do not open if you are sensitive.

BluePony wrote:"If only Breitbart would throw in their support as well... it's a damn shame they folded like that."

That's the real disappointment here. They should have had front page articles on the pedo culture of the Left, the scrubbing of sites like Salon and HuffPo before they posted Milo attack articles, and so on. You couldn't ask for a more target rich environment if the rap community suddenly started supporting feminism.

I'll keep on fighting, but it's hard to avoid the negative whispers in one's mind. If even a powerhouse site like Breitbart folds like a cheap suit from Tijuana, what the fuck is a nobody like me wasting my time for?

Milo was the major draw for their site for many readers. If they toss him overboard they are going to regret it. Infogalatic likely doesn't have enough income to afford Milo but it would be sweet to make him the editor of Infogalactic news.

Sigh, some of you are so dense it hurts. This was nothing more than another figure on the right stepping in it, badly in this case. Some of his comments from that interview are revolting and any normal male with children is going to feel just that, simple disgust.

Yes, the left is capitalizing on it, but Milo handed them the hammer they are currently striking him with.

And right on the precipice of hitting the big time, I’m not sure if Milo finally just put too much weight on the pressure plate or he just decided to step down good in hard.

"How can people not see this as a smear the queer con job by the MSM?"

This right here is what I run into all the time.

"Don't they see...?"

"Don't they realize...?"

Yes, they see. They don't care. Ideological cancers have supplanted reason and critical thinking in most people's minds. That's why we need rhetorical methods. That's all that will work with the masses anymore.

It's just a Trump setup to get the MSM to push the meme that peodos are bad and evil, just before he drops the hammer on PizzaGate. That way these charges are fresh in the media mind and they'll have a hard time walking it back when it's their own favorite pols and talking heads on the block.

I like Milo and want him to have continued success (a win for him, a win for us). In front of Maher he came across somewhat weak and sheepish (starstruck?). Perhaps that gave a perception of weakness and opened the floodgates? He should have pounded (errr...) the 2 dindus (and Maher too; I repeat myself) but let them off rather easily. Come on Milo, hope this lights a fire under you!

@MIG,So you've watched the video and are now on the rim of things. Certainly understanding Milo's experience is a journey of miles of understanding where taking in those last inches really matters.

So you've grabbed hold and are trying to work it out. The final bit may be just too much to swallow:

When Milo "said that he learned a lot from the priest who molested him..." he was very clearly joking in his initial comment ("...learned to give better head..."), and further clarified amd confirmed it was gallows humor in follow up.

On that, he is a victim. How he gets through that trauma, be it sick humor or otherwise, is really on him.

The left is home to NAMBLA for fuck sake, and they're doing the textbook Alinsky "hold your enemy to an impossible standard" tactic. So yeah, if you're not gonna support Milo (whose value to our side has been incalculably high) then you're being played by Marxist scum and maybe you should go back to licking Lindsay Graham's balls.

You don't have to like Milo or his gay schtick, but you haven't learned a thing if you don't know how to recognize shots being fired in your direction, and how and when to fight back.

Will there be a no platforming attempt on this presser? If so how will it be circumvented?

The opposition media likely is concerned with how to handle the presser. Milo seemed defensive yesterday, and that's totally out of character. It likely won't happen again.

I hope/think Breitbart may lay low on the subject through the presser. It really should coordinate with him and run as many celebrity/politico/journo pedo stories as it has at its disposal after Milo references them. The bottom line is Milo made no claims he had engaged in pedophilia or supported it, and the same cannot be said of quite a few prominent SJWs. That angle should be exploited.

I just posted this on Gab because I'm tired of seeing posts there distancing from Milo. It's kinda appropriate here, too:

Milo is a WEAPON for use against the Left. And a damned effective one at that. But some on the Right wish to hand him over to the enemy. There is a word for handing your weapons over to your enemies, you useless cucks: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/surrender

Yes, I think it was probably black humor on his part, and he is only too aware of the Ancient Greek references. Or he was partly joking partly being sincere.

I remember what it was like to be 13. You think you understand everything and you are fully grown up, but your parents and your teachers don't see you as an adult. It is probably tremednously, indescribably flattering to have a fully grown bearded man in spectacles treat you as an adult, tell you anecdotes and ask your opinions on grown-up things as if you were an expert. It must be very seductive.

I'm curious to see what Milo's defense for his enthusiastic support of pederasty will be. His last video did nothing.

The argument that it's not pedophilia, it's only pederasty so that's okay, is absurd. Pederasty is pretty damn close to pedophilia. One is the 8th circle of hell and the other is the 9th, but they're both vile and evil so it's a stupid argument.

Keep in mind Milo has had two decades to reflect on his "victimization" by pederasts and said he was actually the aggressor and enjoyed it. These damning videos he was in are from last year. He has no one to blame but himself.

Are they being used for a political agenda to defame Trump and Alt Right? Of course they are. That still doesn't dismiss Milo's promotion of pederasty as normal and healthy behavior.

Do leftists use selective moralism and outrage? Yes! Lena Dunham is an incestuous pedophile and they love her. Still, we're not lying sociopaths like the left. We shouldn't defend pederasts just because they support Trump.

The only way out I see for Milo is to admit it's wrong, apologize, and seek professional help for his victimization and promotion of pederasty. Deflection is not going to work.

Nope. Not gonna bite this. We were rightfully angry when Salon and NYT tried to promote pedophiles, and now we are to defend this one pedo just because he annoys the opposite side? Nigga pls.Let him burn.

Pederasty is pretty damn close to pedophilia. One is the 8th circle of hell and the other is the 9th, but they're both vile and evil so it's a stupid argument.

The two aren't the same, otherwise the age of consent would be uniform. The only common thread with statutory rape/consent laws worldwide (outside Muslim nations) tends to be sex with a minor prior to puberty always is a crime.

The only way out I see for Milo is to admit it's wrong, apologize, and seek professional help for his victimization and promotion of pederasty. Deflection is not going to work.

"The only way out I see for Milo is to admit it's wrong, apologize, and seek professional help for his victimization and promotion of pederasty. Deflection is not going to work."

That would be a pretty good way for him to end up like Piggy from Lord of the Flies. The internet is all about abject, heartfelt apologies and giving people another chance. Milo has no chance. He won't survive based on anything he's going to do from this point forward. Basically, he's caught in a mosh pit crowd at a festival. It will shove him one direction or another until it either spits him out or tramples him. And truthfully, after having done this same sort of thing to other people, it would be what he deserves if it chews him up and devours him.

No fucking apology is necessary. And people who think Milo's efforts have amounted to 'annoying people on the left' are talking out their asses. They're of the same mind as people who think the best way to deal with BLM is to shut up, listen to them, give them a platform, and try to find a way to pacify them.

Even if some aren't concern trolling, it's always amazing how well people automatically play to the tune of the Left. So don't exactly expect the sudden virtue-signaling Churchianity to get much traction in these parts. You're less than worthless to either Civilization or the Lord. You should learn that.

This whole snafu should be yet another reminder to people that they should not talk to the media. Even people insanely skilled at dealing with them like Trump and Milo can get dogpiled, and while I think both of them can eventually come out on top, you and I definitely would not.

Just read Roosh's accounts of when the media tried dogpiling on him. That sort of situation sucks majorly and messes with your mind.

People like to make themselves out to be infallible to pressure, but that's not true whatsoever.

"How do you do, fellow conservatives! Since Milo was baselessly smeared as a pedophile the only thing he can do if he is a real conservative is abase himself to the left and apologize for queering while conservative. It's the cuckservative way!"

In the midst of the battle a large group of Mildly Concerned Trolls had been pressed together by the barbed spears of the Ilk. The Dread Ilk jumped at the chance. First they riddled the Trolls with poison tipped bolts from their repeating crossbows in order to halt the enemies' regeneration. Then the Dread Ilk leapt forward to slash at the trolls' legs their sickle-swords, hamstringing some and laming the rest. At a centurion's command the Ilk hurled flasks of oil upon the Enemy. Then dramatically a VFM finished off the trolls with its flaming breathe. Alas the musical screams of the Mildly Concerned Trolls did not last long. Still it was glee that the legion reformed its ranks and turned its attention to the rest of the battlefield. Wounded Ilk lay scattered about the battlefield, moaning in pain. This was of no concern as once again it should be mentioned that Ilk healed quickly. Most would soon be back on their feet and serving the Supreme Dark Lord. The rest... well the Ilk were after all the ELOE's most renewable resource. They would always be more Ilk.

What will come of this is Milo will be wiser and thus more dangerous. He will have the added benefit of knowing who he can trust. Trust is a sacred thing. So is loyalty. I've been through this ringer in the military. Your supporters will surprise and disappoint you but you come out with a firm resolve, harder. I hadn't read SJW Always lie yet at the time, but thankfully, I instinctively refused to apologize. He needs to go for the neck.

The way I understand this is that he was NOT arguing for pederasty either, not just pedophilia. He did say that he agreed with the existing age of consent. What he was saying was that the whole conversation around this lacks nuance and discrimination, and that everything is tarred with the same brush, while in reality, sexuality is very complicated, and people's motivations are complicated, and that some adolescents are more mature than we realize. I strongly disagree with the last statement, and I think his host took him to task for this, and rightly so. But what he said was not uttered to defend pederasty, to be fair, but to try to think aloud through the complexities of sexuality and the idea of consensual sex. But our public discourse is not suited to this type of conversation.

Breitbart’s editor-in-chief made an appearance on the conservative website’s daily radio show to denounce comments made by his underling Milo Yiannopoulos defending and endorsing sex between grown men and boys as young as thirteen.

Alex Marlow said Tuesday that video of the comments came as a “total surprise to people in the Breitbart administration,” and that they found them “very troubling and upsetting… the bottom line is the comments are not defensible.”

Marlow didn’t announce any punishment or termination of the senior Breitbart editor, but promised answers later in the day: “Milo’s going to have a press conference later today, and he’s going to talk about his future with Breitbart. He’s going to talk about a bunch of different things,”

“The comments are absolutely indefensible, they’re appalling, and very disappointing that those came out,” he reiterated. “However, there is context. Some of the context is that Milo is a gay man, who was abused as a child. These are not irrelevant.”

Despite his denunciations, Marlow accused anti-Trump conservatives and liberals of digging up the video as a “coordinated hit.” He also accused the media of hypocrisy, saying that Lena Dunham and Roman Polanski‘s actions were much worse.

“There are millions of examples of the left normalizing behavior similar to what Milo describes,” he insisted.

@107Maybe that article was the trigger, but I doubt it was the cause. The whole "CPAC disinvite / S&S book deal cancel / troll swarm on multiple sites" wasn't created on the spur of the moment, it's a public media hit that required advance planning, coordination, and money. The cuckservatives fingerprints are all over this, just as with the "pussy grab" tape.

Nothing in the modern media world just happens by chance. Publishing houses and orgs such as CPAC are like giant, slow moving beasts. They don't just suddenly appear out of the mist, festooned with squads of trolls, horns blowing; someone organized this.

Thurston Pilgrim wrote:We should be bringing up Harvey Milk. He is an actual pederast/rapist and they LOVE him. This is the hypocritical hole in their armor.Riiight. Democrats are the real pedos. And the real racists. And the real sexists.

Okay. You're a VFM, this should be quick. Let's see... You didn't defend Roosh when they called him a rapist.You didn't defend Milo when they called him a pedophile.You didn't defend Vox when they called him, well, anything. And that's a long list.

Seems you aren't a very good ally. VFM status revoked. We've seen the accusations and don't want to be associated with your kind. But good luck with that howling mob of mentally ill liars coming for you, I'm sure they'll be sympathetic to your pleas of innocence against their baseless smears. That's got to start working at some point.

Nope. Not gonna bite this. We were rightfully angry when Salon and NYT tried to promote pedophiles, and now we are to defend this one pedo just because he annoys the opposite side? Nigga pls. Let him burn.

There is no we. You're not one of us. You're just another cuck who runs at the first sign of heat.

Get thee gone. We can abide many things, but not lies and a complete lack of loyalty.

From that video, it seems Milo has the flu. That may be the reason for limiting the response to a quick Facebook video. I think he would have taken something more closely resembling the Cernovich approach had he been at full health. They really lucked out with the timing.

@112 Looks like Marlow & Breitbart have decided to go with "split the difference". Means Milo stays, which is tactical, strategic, business and morally correct choice.

Milo's one mistake is that there are certain topics you can never discuss in an open forum. While they tend to actually be mostly Theological in nature, he ran into one that can be clearly edited to make it look horrible.

On that thought, doesn't Milo have a Defamation suit option against a few actors? Careful editing and removing details, timed with specific actions, says "potential legal rewards" to me. Discovery could be a blast, as well.

Judging from the leftist shills and cucky concern trolls, I'd say the Left views this as a critical battle.

"Dangerous" was the right book title. Milo represents Bad Thought entryism into the popular culture. It and the courts are the Left's last bastions, and any threat to either must be destroyed.

Alex Marlow's statement above actually has a few good lines, not the least of which is the reference to Lena Dunham and Roman Polanski. It's not a preamble to a firing and seems to anticipate some choreographed statements from Milo. We'll see.

"He isn't your ally anymore than a mosquito is just because it causes your opponents discomfort.

You are absolutely wrong. One is not allies with someone who thinks exactly the same as you do. Milo has proved himself to me beyond any shadow of a doubt. Unlike you, he is loyal.

I can't understand why this is such a blind spot for so many here.

Because it isn't. Do you really think a man who recorded three Club Chart techno hits on a gay record label is unaware of the brutal realities of the gay lifestyle?

Seriously?"

You know, whenever you put your foot in it, you go all the way. Calling someone you don't know disloyal based on their opinion of some degenerate gadfly play-acting at being whatever it is you think he is is beneath a response. To be loyal one must have allegiance first and a Milo isn't someone you want on the outskirts of your camp, never mind burrowed up to his eyebrows within it. I repudiate Milo a priori, what he said to Rogan isn't even close to a surprise, it was obvious on its face and if you are comfortable with that, if you really "think like he does" than maybe your values aren't all that you claim they are.

I have always respected your blog even when I haven't got the faintest idea of what you are talking about, from your obsession over Scalzi, to your soccer fetish, but sometimes you just come off unhinged and today is that day.

Milo was an exceedingly poor choice to align with because he is so deeply damaged that all he did was offer targets to the opposition. The MSM is being hypocritical??? Do tell, I never saw that coming. You should read SJW's Always Lie, that would have given you a heads up.

When a man calls himself a "dangerous faggot" it is my opinion that you take him at his word. He is and was a liability in extremis and your stubborn refusal to consider the possibility that you are hitched to the wrong horse says volumes about your loyalty, not mine.

"The only way out I see for Milo is to admit it's wrong, apologize . . ."

Right. If you're on point, advancing under heavy fire and take a flesh wound, what you should do is shoot yourself in the head. That'll show 'em.

The secret to Milo is his frame. No matter what comes at him it doesn't shake him and he just keeps plowing forward. This shook him. His response was uncharacteristically defensive.

He needs to sit down, take a few deep breaths, pull himself together - then get mad and Attack! Attack! Attack!

Those of us who haven't abandoned and left holes in the line, or joined the dingo herd trying to rip apart their own at the least scent of blood, need to close in ranks, make sure our shields are covering our left hand man, hold the line and keep moving it forward.

Come on, you sons of bitches, do want to live forever?For Christ's sake men—come on!

You know, whenever you put your foot in it, you go all the way. Calling someone you don't know disloyal based on their opinion of some degenerate gadfly play-acting at being whatever it is you think he is is beneath a response. To be loyal one must have allegiance first and a Milo isn't someone you want on the outskirts of your camp, never mind burrowed up to his eyebrows within it. I repudiate Milo a priori, what he said to Rogan isn't even close to a surprise, it was obvious on its face and if you are comfortable with that, if you really "think like he does" than maybe your values aren't all that you claim they are.

You have literally no idea what you're talking about, cucky. Milo has proved himself to me. You have not.

You are disloyal. I know, for a fact, that Milo would not do what you have done. Milo stands by people even when they come under fire.

You don't. So, you're not one of us. We'll take Milo, with all his weaknesses and flaws, over you. We prefer the degenerate to the disloyal, because there is always hope for the degenerate to repent.

There is no hope for the disloyal. You'll always be a self-righteous coward.

This whole snafu should be yet another reminder to people that they should not talk to the media.

Very true. Even though Milo is very good at it, in the Rogan interview, you can see how he got into trouble. Rogan was badgering him about revealing the names of his abusers, and Milo started into rambling rationalizations about why he doesn't want to -- rationalizations he's surely been using to cope with it for years -- trying to explain why he doesn't see his own abuse in clear-cut terms, how he feels like he was the seducer despite his youth, and so on.

It's actually a poignant look at the mental contortions abuse victims put themselves through, but it provided easy pull-quotes that can be make to sound like he's justifying something.

old man in a villa wrote:You know, whenever you put your foot in it, you go all the way. Calling someone you don't know disloyal based on their opinion of some degenerate gadfly play-acting at being whatever it is you think he is is beneath a response. To be loyal one must have allegiance first and a Milo isn't someone you want on the outskirts of your camp, never mind burrowed up to his eyebrows within it. I repudiate Milo a priori, what he said to Rogan isn't even close to a surprise, it was obvious on its face and if you are comfortable with that, if you really "think like he does" than maybe your values aren't all that you claim they are.

I have always respected your blog even when I haven't got the faintest idea of what you are talking about, from your obsession over Scalzi, to your soccer fetish, but sometimes you just come off unhinged and today is that day.

Milo was an exceedingly poor choice to align with because he is so deeply damaged that all he did was offer targets to the opposition. The MSM is being hypocritical??? Do tell, I never saw that coming. You should read SJW's Always Lie, that would have given you a heads up.

When a man calls himself a "dangerous faggot" it is my opinion that you take him at his word. He is and was a liability in extremis and your stubborn refusal to consider the possibility that you are hitched to the wrong horse says volumes about your loyalty, not mine.

Sad.Are you familiar at all with the tactics of the shield wall? Look at the tactics of the Battle of Stamford Bridge as an example. What happens when there's a breach in the shield wall?

Stand firm, you maggot, or get out of the way and we'll deal with you later.

old man in a villa wrote:As they say in the Marines, this is not the hill you want to die on,regardless of how badly you wish to remain principled allies.As they say in the Marines Semper fi, motherfucker

"You know, whenever you put your foot in it, you go all the way. Calling someone you don't know disloyal based on their opinion of some degenerate gadfly play-acting at being whatever it is you think he is is beneath a response. To be loyal one must have allegiance first and a Milo isn't someone you want on the outskirts of your camp, never mind burrowed up to his eyebrows within it. I repudiate Milo a priori, what he said to Rogan isn't even close to a surprise, it was obvious on its face and if you are comfortable with that, if you really "think like he does" than maybe your values aren't all that you claim they are.

You have literally no idea what you're talking about, cucky. Milo has proved himself to me. You have not.

You are disloyal. I know, for a fact, that Milo would not do what you have done. Milo stands by people even when they come under fire.

You don't. So, you're not one of us. We'll take Milo, with all his weaknesses and flaws, over you. We prefer the degenerate to the disloyal, because there is always hope for the degenerate to repent.

There is no hope for the disloyal. You'll always be a self-righteous coward."

I was one of the first openly WN/alt-right/RadTrad writers to be publicly doxxed and pilloried and NOT ONE PERSON came to my aid, NOT ONE. You must have been busy mixing your club music tracks that month.I understand perfectly what the media and it's foot soldiers do to a target and I wish it upon no man, woman or Milo. That doesn't mean he and I are soul brothers.

I weathered the storm with my family, rebuilt my entire life to be anti-fragile and completely dependent upon NO ONE but myself and my family. I traded in a life in the 1% for a life at sustenance level and never flagged in what I believed or said and continued to offer as much advice and support as I could to anyone else who came along and suffered the same fate.

I have also served in combat and come under actual fire, unlike you, so I know where my loyalty/devotion to duty stock stands, your groundless accusations aside. I never considered Milo to be an ally of any sort and so could not be said to shirk in my loyalty towards him.

That said I have appreciated your contributions for years and while I do not find common ground on every view, I know a natural ally when I see one even if you fail to see that in return. Your call. If you look at my posting history I have never been anything but supportive and respectful but that doesn't mean I haven't got an opinion of my own and today that is quite clear. Calling someone like me disloyal is histrionic, not rational and that's not something I expected from you.

Milo was a catastrophically bad choice for anything other than entertainment value. He is deeply damaged and now he has damaged others who bent over backwards to accommodate his degeneracy simply because he was striking at a common enemy. He is the conservative movement's equivalent of Frank Collin. Milo is not your natural ally, he is a representative of all the illness that pervades our society, he is a ego driven homosexual car wreck looking for a minivan full of breeders to slam into and you have mistaken him for a fellow traveler.

Your love for him is equal to your enmity for Scalzi and both are equally toxic to your brand.

I will dust my feet at your doorstep and darken it no further. It looks like you have a firm handle on things.

Nothing like a little shit storm to find out the quislings in this blog community. Allies are allies until they aren't. Hitler back stabbed Stalin, and he became our partner. Was he a good guy? No, but he worked with us to defeat Hitler. So some of you are backstabbing little Hitlers.

old man in a villa wrote:I have always respected your blog even when I haven't got the faintest idea of what you are talking about, from your obsession over Scalzi, to your soccer fetish, but sometimes you just come off unhinged and today is that day.

I am Concerned! I have heard rumors Vox has a soccer fetish! Do I need to Disavow? My cisovoballity makes me VERY uncomfortable with soccer balls. It is so difficult to have reliable allies with no faults these days!

endwatcher wrote:Be wiser about who are your allies in the future, so you aren't stuck defending a losing position. He was a moral level weak spot so you lost the battle from the get go.

Because, the first thing I think when someone is Leading the charge and smacking down the enemy left and right is "Gee, I wonder what his moral level is. Maybe I should think twice before backing him up."

Y'wanna know what moral level I'm worried about? Will they fight with me and will they back me and mine up when I am down.

You shit on your allies...you are useless. Go cower in the corner with the other spinsters and get out of the way of those who are going to fight.

damn...I feel bad I slept in...a whole lot of folks from Bangalore are working the second shift with their anti-Milo scripts. Soros must have put in a rush order...

If Breitbart's editor understood that the gig is up and decided to publicly denounce the Jew, the WTF is the deal with this site supporting still him? There is nothing to gain from it, and everything to lose. Milo's final service to the Left would be cause a divide and war within alt right...

FYI, looks like Daily Dot tracked down Reagan Battalion as a rebranding of the defunct Stop Trump Pac which backed Rubio then McMuffin. So likely a bunch of NeverTrumpers or Dem activists (is there really a difference?) Discovery proceeds.

Gotta love these people dictating how none of us should appreciate Milo's standing up to the left for years, facing down riots to speak freely - even provocatively - against a bunch of increasingly violent left-wing zealots.

He's imperfect! He's gay, don't you see? You should hold out for a *better* ally!

For fucking who? This mythical universally praiseworthy individual who the press won't leap on, hypocritically, for any infraction? This sounds like David French chiding everyone for supporting Milo on the grounds that he says *very* shocking things which just emboldens the SJWs, who feel justified in their hatred of the right if we dare say things that *truly* upset them.

I have dozens of allies, hundreds of minions, and thousands of Dread Ilk, all of whom are willing to stand by me. And one of the main reasons why is that they know I will stand by them.

I know a natural ally when I see one even if you fail to see that in return.

No, you don't. There is no such thing as a "natural ally". We may agree on many things, we can work in parallel, but because you have no capacity for loyalty, you cannot ever be an ally. I would NEVER trust an individual like you, because the only thing that is important to you in the end is your opinion of the other person.

That's fine. That's your choice. But someone like you will disappear the moment he can rationalize a justification for doing so.

A true ally is someone who cusses you out for your stupidity or failure while standing at your shoulder, shooting back at those targeting you.

joe scarab wrote:If Breitbart's editor understood that the gig is up and decided to publicly denounce the Jew, the WTF is the deal with this site supporting still him? There is nothing to gain from it, and everything to lose. Milo's final service to the Left would be cause a divide and war within alt right...

He cucked out, and absolutely had to disavow. But he realizes they would lose massive traffic, so he dare not fire him.Tough spot for a useless cuck to be in, ain't it?

I have been supporting Castalia for ages now, by buying your releases, but I don't think that I'll spend a cent more on our books if any of it might go to support of this degenerate, especially if you plan to publish him book. FFS, everyone has cut him off, and with a good reason.

I can only hope that some of your better authors, proper Christian conservatives or not, will find a better small press or consider self publishing. That is all.

Pietr Rozga wrote:I have been supporting Castalia for ages now, by buying your releases, but I don't think that I'll spend a cent more on our books if any of it might go to support of this degenerate, especially if you plan to publish him book. FFS, everyone has cut him off, and with a good reason.Why do you lie to us? I hate it when you lie to us.

Privately. In the confessional. For all you know, he does that every week.

You appear to know little about Confession. Milo is an active sodomite if he is to be taken at his word. One cannot go to Confession and be absolved if he intends to keep committing the same sodomitic sins.

ALL Of these posts are moral in that they all present arguments telling the reader he must do thus and such.

One encouraging thing coming out of this: a lot of people on the right, alt-right and fellow provocateurs, are voicing support for Milo even if they disagree with what he said. This will show everyone just who can last under MSM fire, and who's going to cut and run when shit gets tough.

And thus Gamergate has hardened many people to the tactics of both enemy and 'allies'.

People have been shooting at Milo from the first time he defended gamers (not being a gamer himself) and they won't stop. But the tactics are far from original.

And please give me the exact quotes that are indefensible. Pointing out the reality we live in and how complicated it is should be encouraged. I'm sorry we can't live in the fantasy you want to live in.

Don't forget: Never Trumpers, both hardcore Hill bots and paid shills, are a tiny, tiny minority of the American people. Their boy McMuffins was humiliated in the one state he was being hyped in, and absolutely annihilated everywhere else.

I want to send Milo some money and a nice note, but I can't find a PayPal link anywhere on the Net. And buy a copy of SJWs Always Lie. Anyone know a good way to support people being hunted by SJWs?

Snidely Whiplash wrote:The shills are a bit thick today, aren't they?They even pre-picked their names. My favorite is "Endwatcher." We had one of those at work, but one of the female employees caught him and he got written up by HR.

So likely a bunch of NeverTrumpers or Dem activists (is there really a difference?)

As a practical matter, no. They may have started out marching to different beats, but they're singing in unison now.

Think of a NeverTrumper, then ask yourself: if he were kidnapped and replaced by a Soros-paid shill tomorrow, would you be able to tell the difference? Or would he keep right on doing what the original was doing?

One day each man posting his opinions in here will stand before the Judgement Seat of Christ and he will be held responsible for being an accessory to the sin of another but all will be forgiven because nationalism, ally, etc etc, I guess.

Jesus established His Catholic Church for two reasons only

SalvationSanctification

and the once Christian Catholic West ought to be seen as a dying man who needs the sacraments, not as a dying nation which requires an anthropocentric program that defends flamboyant sodomy, or white supremacy, or any other discredited sinful approach.

Because Jesus Christ is King of King, any legislation opposed to His Kingship and Commandments is doomed to failure just as the American nation was doomed to failure from its inception

It doesn't have to be an apology. He didn't injure anyone with his comments. But he should get rid of the gay baggage - it's a huge problem. It doesn't provide him any cover from the left, as this crisis has demonstrated, and it poses insurmountable barriers for many on the right, and not just the cucks.

I would point Milo to Mel Gibson. Apologizing profusely for that DUI rant didn't do jack for him, but his wild alcoholism and philandering absolutely was a big problem. He got himself out of his trainwreck relationship, got himself clean and sober and returned to work after about 3 years off the grid. Now he's churning out movies again.

Amateur Brain Surgeon wrote:One day each man posting his opinions in here will stand before the Judgement Seat of Christ and he will be held responsible for being an accessory to the sin of another but all will be forgiven because nationalism, ally, etc etc, I guess.Oh, come off it.When you stand before the Throne, you will be asked "I gave you a Christian civilization, the greatest the world had ever seen. A civilization that saved literally billions of souls. You watched it be destroyed. What did you do to save it?"

Will your answer be "I avoided faggots"?

Take your gay shill ass off the chair and do something useful, for once in your pathetic life.

One cannot go to Confession and be absolved if he intends to keep committing the same sodomitic sins.

Right. He must have the "firm amendment" of avoiding the sin in the future when he makes Confession. But we often fail in keeping to that amendment -- most of us many times over -- and that doesn't invalidate the sacrament.

I am a Cradle Roman Catholic

That's nice. Maybe you should do an Examination of Conscience and ask yourself what sins were involved in making baseless assumptions about another man's private spiritual life to try to score political points in a public forum.

"Thanks, Michael Thompson. But it ain't begging, even in joke. As far as I'm concerned it's partial and late payment for services rendered."

I would guess that's probably how those who pay Anita Sarkeesian for what she does view it also. And I don't really mean any offense. We all have to adjust to new realities in a changing world and one of of the ones that has been hardest for me is the the bland acceptance of the newer generation to just come right out and ask for money in the form of crowdfunding and paypal and the like.

Lew Rand:And please give me the exact quotes that are indefensible. Pointing out the reality we live in and how complicated it is should be encouraged. I'm sorry we can't live in the fantasy you want to live in.

I know what is objectionable, but I don't think the objections are well founded or well reasoned.

I got myself stuck in a debate over what he said that I don't want to finish.

king random wrote:As breitbart kicked him out, he will soon be starving. Unless there are cucks willing to bleed money into him, of course. Methinks that there aren't many of those left.When did Breitbart fire him? Links or it didn't happen.

and the once Christian Catholic West ought to be seen as a dying man who needs the sacraments, not as a dying nation which requires an anthropocentric program that defends flamboyant sodomy, or white supremacy, or any other discredited sinful approach.Oh, fer cryin' out loud. Not only do we have to read every other stupid thing that you wrote, but now we get a self-righteous Catholic missionary hard sell?

Take your Popism and stuff it. I don't mind allying with the Catholics when they're shooting in the right direction, and most of them seem like a decent sort. But this right here is where you lose Christian America.