Today was probably a turning point
They will never impeach Trump. Comey's testimony backfired so badly it in fact served as a well targeted weapon against the Democrats Trump-Russia collusion bit the dust today.There will be fallout for the democrats.

The democrats, Clinton, the NWO has now arrived at only one possible final answer: To kill Trump. Truly, they thought they had it and Comey was nothing but a bumbling nitwit that blew it for everyone. Not that he could have made it work when there was NOTHING on Trump in any way whatsoever, but he certainly should have at least looked better than he did. He looked like he was assigned to be the FBI director as some sort of honorary role, and not anything that would actually do a job. He was a national disgrace.

It looks like Comey's testimony is going to backfire
What if Trump was playing multiple dimension chess by keeping Comey as long as he did? Comey destroyed himself today. Today it was confirmed that Trump did not interfere with anything and is guilty of nothing and that Hillary is well protected. It was confirmed (after Comey said he met with Obama twice, ) that he in fact met with Obama many times. It is confirmed that Comey had a hatred for Trump.

Comey basically completely fell apart. He hit several conflicts in his words that proves he lied all the way through the testimony. If Trump wanted late-in-the-game ammo to use at the best possible time, Comey just handed it to him. Additionally, it is now confirmed that Trump was never under investigation over Russia, and that the media lied about every single bit of it.

House Democrats have begun drafting articles of impeachment for Trump, and made it formal a day before Comey's testimony. No doubt they were expecting to get what they needed during that testimony. And they got NOTHING but a Trump check mate. I am actually stunned by how miraculously badly this went for the enemies of Trump, rather than make Trump look bad, Comey's testimony bolstered Trump strongly. Trump is not going to get impeached, he's going nowhere but back to the white house amidst a shower of shrieks from wild political monkeys.

I heard something to that effect, yes. So different topic, but same question: Do we have an infrastructure bill? You know, a proposal that is actually written on paper? The whole idea behind Infrastructure Week is to build support for a bill, right? Have you seen a bill? Anything resembling a bill?

“Well, no. We’re still working on the details of that one too. The details, and the overall strategy…”

So at this point, your proposal isn’t worth the paper it isn’t written on, right?

“Don’t be so mean. Nobody knew that infrastructure could be so complicated. But youknow what the real problem is? The real problem is that so far, the Democrats in Congress have only approved 40 of the 559 nominations that we need to fully staff the administration. It’s a terrible scandal, just further proof of how Mr. Trump isn’t even getting a chance. The president even tweeted about it!”

You don’t say.

“Yup. See!”

Yes, I could certainly see where having no staff could present a problem in implementing an agenda. But … the Democrats don’t control the Senate. The Republicans do, correct?

“Sure, but ….”

And of those 559 vacancies, the Trump administration has formally nominated just 83 people, leaving 436 with no one even nominated. It’s hard to confirm nominations that haven’t been made, just like you can’t pass bills that have never been written. In fact, the word in Washington is that taking a job in the Trump administration is like buying a ticket on the Titanic, but with no lifeboats.

Share on other sites

"Almost 200 Congressional Democrats have gotten together for a nuisance lawsuit alleging that Donald Trump’s business interests violates the U.S. Constitution.

The lawsuit has been joined by a larger number of plaintiffs than any other lawsuit filed against Trump, according to Daily Caller.

“We do this not out of any sense of pleasure or partisanship, but because President Trump has left us with no other option,” said Michigan Democratic Rep. John Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.

The Democrats are alleging that the president’s business interests breaks Article I that bars “emoluments” and “forbids public officials from accepting gifts of value or receiving special treatment in commercial dealings with foreign interests without the approval of Congress,” DC wrote.

But in fact, the Constitution does not bar a president from having business interests in foreign countries. The purpose of the clause was to prevent presidents from becoming beholden to foreign governments, not to stop them from having businesses that deal with foreign citizens."

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Trump is Right?: Science backs him up to get away from the Paris Climate Agreement

I guess this fits in here....

There is a very famous Japanese scientist who is backing Trump's move to get out of the Paris treaty....he has the proof to say NO to join it.

This scientist is Dr. Kunihiko Takeda. He is known to spit out quite various range of knowledge, and he used to be in the panel to tell off the Nuke Plants what are not working in the industry before.

(c)Dr. K Takeda/Toranomon News 2017 All rights reserved.

Please look at the thin line the doc is using his pointer to show us how it's elevating.

This line was what Al Gore and his scientists used to tell everyone "this is the reason why we gotta do something about it".

Then we all went FARG and started to be "eco-friendly" since then.

The THICK BLACK LINE=The REAL data gathered over the years, and dotted line was what expected/predicted as "natural" movement of the temp without CO2 hike concerned.

THAT THICK BLACK LINE IS FOLLOWING NON-AL GORE LINE.

Al Gore's theory is debunked by the real data.

IF THIS IS CORRECT, THERE'S NO POINT IN KEEPING THE PARIS AGREEMENT.

The Doc says that Trump movement makes sense.

Besides, I'm sure we start to wonder about Al Gore and for whom he was working for......ummmmmmmm....

Who really gained from the movement in reality is a point to ponder about, as all of us start to wonder.

And this is a reality in Japan....this doc discovered that while Japanese peeps got something like 34 variation of Recycling system installed in one shire of Tokyo, and IT'S CAUSING MORE ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION BY FORCING RECYCLING THERE. It costs more, it makes more runs by cars to collect, etc etc, all in the end, it's better for the environment to stop separating stuff to recycle altogether, go back to 40 yrs ago's way to treat them.

...Now, I prefer to be environmentally kind. I don't just agree with what the doc said just above. We gotta educate our kids to do the recycling, and learn to appreciate things we have, learn to deter from GREED. Such as "Mottainai-idea" is truly meaningful. But also it's important to teach them the reality so they can suss out how to achieve far better recycling system to be installed in near future.

So things are still not exactly set by just one way for our world.

Let's keep on thinking hard about what we can do to help Earth regardless.

<Add to Edit: 17-6-2017>

Found this article today.

MARKO, SOON, ET AL: To Put America First Is to Put Our Planet’s Climate First

Gregg Jarrett is adamant that Robert Mueller, according to statute, must step down from his appointment as the special prosecutor targeting President Trump. He states, “Given the latest Washington Post story, if it’s true, there’s even a more compelling reason now that Robert Mueller cannot serve as special counsel. He has a glaring conflict of interest – his closeness to the star witness in the case, James Comey.”

Jarrett continues, “And you look at the Special Counsel statute and it says, that if you have a ‘personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the investigation or prosecution,’ you cannot serve, it’s mandatory language, you shall disqualify yourself.”

He says, “Well Comey is substantially involved, he’s the central witness in this case. It’s not fair to President Trump, it’s not fair to the American public who expect this proceeding to be fair and impartial and objective. It cannot be if these two guys have such a long track record together. Close friends, allies, partners, they handle cases together. The Washingtonian said there’s only one guy in Washington that Comey trusts and that’s Bob Mueller. They’re too close.”

He notes there were plenty of other choices who didn’t have this same level of conflict of interest built into the selection. Jarrett says, “You know, if it’s a he said – he said on obstruction, who is Mueller going to believe? His good, close friend or the man who fired his good, close friend?” Super lawyer Rosenstein surely must have been aware of the conflict, he’s a crony of Mueller’s as well. Why would he try to slip it past the American people? Is he as dirty as Comey and Mueller? Sure he is.

And not to split hairs, Jarrett, but the American people will be shocked if this witch hunt somehow turns out to be something fair and impartial and objective. That is the last thing we expect. It started out as a witch hunt, it’s been conducted to this point in that manner and there is no reason to believe that it will be conducted any differently in the future.

Where is the Republican leadership, if that word can be used to describe McConnell and Ryan, on this? Why are the Democrats driving the agenda and the sacrificing of the President and his agenda on the Democrat altar when those limp-wristed nothings are supposedly in control? Could it be because they are working for the entrenched uni-party establishment and the Democrats? Of course they are.

Thank you for reading and sharing my work – Please look for me, Rick Wells

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

And Trump admitted he didn't have the actual recordings of the conversation he had with Comey adds the fuel for people to drag him down from the Presidency.(´Д｀) He really needs to "get it" before he releases his crappy info. Everyone makes mistakes. for sure, but when he's in the Presidency....THINK and Ask for the Proof status before he opens his mouth/writes in Tweets would be wiser choice, methinks....

2

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

@unity I get what you are saying, but people need to see what he actually says, not what they heard or interpreted what he said. I believe in the case of Comey, Trump said what he did, in order for Comey to make sure when testifying, that he told the truth. Comey had no way of knowing, did Trump have tapes, but it sure gave Comey something to take into consideration. There are times I go ouch too, and wish he'd maybe be just a tad more circumspect.

Kind of like the testimony of Coates, that Trey Gowdy and Adam Schiff promised Coates, would not be leaked. Yet within 8 hours, 3 leaks had been released. Gowdy then states it wasn't him, or Schiff. I object, because Gowdy cannot speak for Schiff, period! In fact, in my twisted way of thinking, he'd be my first suspect. 9 people in that closed door session, and 3 leaks within 8 hours. I'd call them all back for investigation, after I searched their person for bugs, or cell phones, and after that chamber was guaranteed clean. We have a bunch of liars and traitors in the gov't, which is obvious, but even the Dems are starting to backpedal, and every day Americans are showing through elections, that they are also sick of it.

I begin to wonder if a clean sweep, throw all the bums out, might be the way to go.

5

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

I agree Breezy. With Trump I think there is always a method in his madness - he is not an idiot and knows he is really up against it with the establishment that thought they had it all sown up, so IMO he is going to use every trick in the book to make sure the Truth comes out.

He knows how to win and winning is what is required here - one way or another.

4

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Imo, Trump never said HE had tapes. Breezy is right, people need to pay attention to what he says. He very carefully chooses his words, even though people choose to portray him as an idiot. He is far from it. Listen to some of Scott Adams' stuff on Trump and persuasion.

Back to my first point, here's what he actually said:

This was also said in an environment of discussion about him being spied on by the intelligence agencies. I've never taken this to mean that he had tapes. For me, it seems like a reminder that anyone could have made a record of the conversation given the current climate, so be careful how you characterize our conversation.

Also, it's so funny that we still say tapes - like someone is going to pull out a reel to reel. Anyone remember how to thread those? ?

"Like many of you, I have been entertained by the unstoppable clown car that is Donald Trump. On the surface, and several layers deep as well, Trump appears to be a narcissistic blow-hard with inadequate credentials to lead a country.

The only problem with my analysis is that there is an eerie consistency to his success so far. Is there a method to it? Is there some sort of system at work under the hood?

Probably yes. Allow me to describe some of the hypnosis and persuasion methods Mr. Trump has employed on you. (Most of you know I am a trained hypnotist and this topic is a hobby of mine.)"

Share on other sites

"The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced Tuesday, to the delight of rural America, that the Trump administration is moving to rescind the Obama era’s “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) regulatory rule.
WOTUS gave the federal government effective authority over water use on 247 million acres of American farmland.

The EPA took to Twitter at #WOTUS to call its action a significant step to return power to states and provide regulatory certainty to the nation’s farmers and businesses. The EPA added that its decision is consistent with the Executive Order signed by President Trump on February 28, aimed at “Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule.”

The Obama administration’s WOTUS regulatory expansion cleverly redefined the term “navigable waters” to include “intermittent streams.” Environmental activists hailed the WOTUS’s expansion of federal jurisdiction over land and water use as an essential common-sense-rule to protect water for wildlife and drinking water supplies for 117 million Americans."

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Here is an article about Trump and how he operates. Some of you may enjoy reading it, as I did. In a way it explains the tweeting, imo, in any case. Written in 2015. tx Reddwolf.

Yes, I like listening to Scott (though Scott himself is a bit narcissistic! He'd probably agree on that.) He does almost daily Periscopes, sometimes multiple times a day. I agree with his Trump analysis. It's fascinating and it's something I figured out about Trump when I was in my teens/early 20's when I read some of his books and saw him maneuver in his business dealings. Like him or hate him, he is a fascinating figure. I do believe he is playing 3D or 5D chess. I mean, just look at this CNN thing. He started in on them months ago, singling them out for the fake news and look how that has been revealed to be true. People have been lambasting him for months on it, but he never gave in. I do believe there is a method to his madness. And if people would gain control of their emotional buttons and insecurities, they would be able to see it too.

In Scott's article, he said:

Quote

On a recent TV interview, the host (I forget who) tried to label Trump a “whiner.” But instead of denying the label, Trump embraced it and said was the best whiner of all time, and the country needs just that. That’s a psychological trick I call “taking the high ground” and I wrote about it in a recent blog post. The low ground in this case is the unimportant question of whether “whiner” is a fair label for Trump. But Trump cleverly took the high ground, embraced the label, and used it to set an anchor in your mind that he is the loudest voice for change. That’s some clown genius for you.

It reminds me of something the most influential spiritual teacher in my life said. I've often thought about it too. He said that when people call him an asshole, he says, "Thanks for noticing." lmao. Then he moves on. That sort of thing can truly disarm the other person. And, on a spiritual level, it allows you to accept all parts of yourself -- integration of self. There's the power.

5

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

SGT A’s Open Letter To Morning Joe And All Other President Trump Detractors!

First, my apologies to my regular readers. If you find anything I have to say here too harsh, I apologize, but like President Trump—and I am sure many others—I have had it with all these self-righteous pompous nobodies, running down the President non-stop, day in and day out.

I’ll start by addressing this Holier-than-Thoumentality Morning Joey and other liberal fools have, who keep talking about how the President’s Tweets are beneath the Office of the President. Everyone seems to recognize that Joey and and his soon to be unhappy wife, Mika, were out of line, then comes the BUT… BUT they are just television host and Donald Trump is the President of the United States!

I totally agree Donald Trump is Presidentof the United States, but those two are not just television host, they are terrible television host, with less viewers than I could get doing a live Facebook broadcast.

But let me toss in my BUT… BUT,if everyone suddenly wants to exalt the position of the President of the United States and condemn Donald Trump for not being worthy of such a prestigious office, then how about you morons show some respect for the prestigious office Donald Trump was appointed to lead by the American people, and treat him like the President of the United States deserves to be treated!

You clowns seem to think you representthe American people and that everyone feels the same as you do about the President… News break! We the PeopleELECTEDDonald J. Trump to be the President of the United States…NOTyou!

Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential electionwith the largest electoral college landslide in the history of America, who the hell do you think you are to decide he is not worthy of office? The two of you make a lot of brainless comments about how mentally unstable and unfit President Trump is, but I would suggest that it is the two of you who are delusional and experiencing delusions of grandeur! If anyone needs to be evaluated, it is two television host with no standing in the ratings, who believe they represent the people and are of more importance than the President of the United States! Tell me, do you hear the voices of all the people you think you represent?