1. Kansas City - Star Lotulelei -DT- Utah
This year's QBs are lol. Reid has a documented history of regularly taking DLs in the 1st round. Adding Star allows them to move Poe to DE where he'll be a much better fit.

2. Jacksonville - Bjoern Werner -DE- Florida State
They need a QB as badly as the Chiefs do, but should also seek to address that need later. Werner should provide an immediate boost to their nonexistent pass rush.

***Trade*** Cards send their 1 & 2 for Oakland's 1

3. Arizona - Luke Joeckel -OT- Texas A&M
Whoever lines up under center for the Redbirds is going to need better protection than this season's passers (term used loosely) were afforded.

***Trade*** Oakland sends the 2nd round pick they received in the trade with the Cardinals, plus their own 4th round pick, to Seattle for the 25th overall selection.

25. Oakland - Tyler Eifert -TE- ND (Roll Tide)
Easy to argue for an OL or more defensive help here, but adding a legit redzone target, not to mention potential #1 receiving option, is just good business. Had to jump some teams likely targeting Eifert here.

But Arizona or Buffalo a few picks later (in this case the NYJ, as well)... they can totally take these QB's. If none of these QB's are good enough to be considered at #1 overall in your eyes then I don't think it makes much sense for them to be good enough to still be consider a top 10 pick. And if you do consider them a top 10 talent then the importance of the position should then vault them towards the top spot. IMO.

I don't pretend to know what Reid and KC will do, but this line of thinking on these mocks doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

1. Kansas City - Star Lotulelei -DT- Utah
This year's QBs are lol. Reid has a documented history of regularly taking DLs in the 1st round. Adding Star allows them to move Poe to DE where he'll be a much better fit.

A. Do you know who the first player Andy Reid drafted when he became coach of the Eagles was? It wasn't a lineman, it was Donovan McNabb.

B. Just because last year was the best year for quarterbacks in the last 30 (at least according to John Dorsey in an interview yesterday), doesn't make this the worst year. Sure, there is no Andrew Luck or RG3 but Chiefs fans will be glad to have the next Donovan McNabb or Aaron Rodgers.

But Arizona or Buffalo a few picks later (in this case the NYJ, as well)... they can totally take these QB's. If none of these QB's are good enough to be considered at #1 overall in your eyes then I don't think it makes much sense for them to be good enough to still be consider a top 10 pick. And if you do consider them a top 10 talent then the importance of the position should then vault them towards the top spot. IMO.

I don't pretend to know what Reid and KC will do, but this line of thinking on these mocks doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

Passing up an elite talent for a highly suspect QB...that's what doesn't make sense.

None of them are "good enough to be considered top 10 picks", but some fool team will reach for them. I genuinely hope that KC is one of them. Oakland needs all the help they can get.

A. Do you know who the first player Andy Reid drafted when he became coach of the Eagles was? It wasn't a lineman, it was Donovan McNabb.

B. Just because last year was the best year for quarterbacks in the last 30 (at least according to John Dorsey in an interview yesterday), doesn't make this the worst year. Sure, there is no Andrew Luck or RG3 but Chiefs fans will be glad to have the next Donovan McNabb or Aaron Rodgers.

Just because there are QBs in this draft doesn't mean they're any good.

No one is measuring them against Luck or RGIII. They're simply not that good. The McNabb/Rodgers comparison is beyond ridiculous.

Ok, so the Jets "need a QB" and are going to take one top 10, but the Chiefs can take another DL top 5 in the last 5 years because QB isn't a need for us? Mark Sanchez is a massive upgrade over who the Chiefs have, so this line of reasoning makes little sense.

Jesse Williams is a terrible pick. He does not fill a need. We have Akiem Hicks and Broderick Bunkley on the roster, and do not need another NT. If we take a DT, then it would be Richardson or Hankins--guys who offer versatility in the middle.

Beyond this, with Mingo on the board, it just doesn't make sense for them to pass on him. Actually, YOU HAVE MINGO going twice--Cleveland and Pittsburgh (I guess you must really want him in the AFC North). Even if Mingo is on the board, I think the next pick would be Dion Jordan who do you not have going at all in the first round. You also have Ansah and Montgomery on the board who would be better picks than Williams and I am not super high on Monty.

I laugh at you because in your comments you have the Jets taking Ryan Nassib and the first thing you say is because I quote "**** the Bills" thats why. How does that make any sense? If the Bills want Nassib, last time I checked they can pick him.

Nassib doesn't even look like a day 2 selection let alone a top 10 pick. Only way get gets taken in the first 2 rounds is if the bills take him. There's no way the jets take him with the 9th overall pick. Pick 10 in the 2nd to the bills is his absolute highest.