Working hastily to setup a interestingly shot of a salon store front ..this ferocious dog was not going to have it. I pleaded in my best French ...until the proprietor approached to my rescue. The fashion ad figure went perfectly .....with the scolding of the terrier.

RSL I try to make all the images about 5.5 meg -- ( 7X7 200dpi) reduced down from 60+ megs ... Should I make them smaller >?? I'm use to printing {not the net } with images .... MAX 16 X 16 inches 300dpi

RSL I try to make all the images about 5.5 meg -- ( 7X7 200dpi) reduced down from 60+ megs ... Should I make them smaller >?? I'm use to printing {not the net } with images .... MAX 16 X 16 inches 300dpi

Thanks

Of course, people have different down load speeds and different size screens. After RSL suggested something like this to me, I posted two versions of each picture for a while: large and small in terms of file size, not resolution. I've gotten lazy and fallen out of the habit lately; maybe I will go back to it. Both size files developed counts for viewing with the large ones being more popular. I like your picture too. Thanks for showing it in as much detail as you have.

I have a 26 in screen I view everything on ~~ 1680 X ... If a photo, I view posted here is fuzzy >> I move on the on to next . I think the images I have been loading are quality enough for most viewing ...but lets us know the "standard" ...thanks