My method of bringing new life to archival images is to look at what happens at the margins rather than the center of a picture. I am also obsessed with making links, based on the belief that everything is connected. And also with what I call “narrative environments,” mediating spaces facilitating new forms of engagement.

My method of bringing new life to archival images is to look at what happens at the margins rather than the center of a picture. I am also obsessed with making links, based on the belief that everything is connected. And also with what I call “narrative environments,” mediating spaces facilitating new forms of engagement.

When Marion von Osten and Grant Watson invited me to contribute to Corresponding With by developing a new work based on a personal reading of archival material, I responded with enthusiasm. Despite this enthusiasm, however, I was also a bit hesitant: hesitant to be thrown into a project with so many professionals and scholars for whom the Bauhaus constitutes their field of expertise; hesitant about my subjective interpretations to the ordering system of the archive. I came up with the idea of re-staging Life Construction, an experimental exhibition from 1931—building on four reproductions documenting the exhibition—through a structure inspired by Jikken Kōbō, a postwar artist group active in Tokyo in the 1950s, about which I will have more to say in what follows.

One of the routes through which Bauhaus ideas were first introduced in Japan, Life Construction was designed by architect Renshichiro Kawakita together with former Bauhaus student Takehiko Mizutani. It combined the design principles and preliminary course praxis of the Bauhaus with material from the Japanese modernist movement and local crafts. One of the many challenges in this project has been that apart from this documentation and a few mentions within scholarly articles, there is little information about the exhibition—especially not in English. The potential I saw in these limitations was to use the documentation as raw material and give it a multidimensional quality.

This aspect of multidimensionality has been central to the development of Model for a Pedagogical Vehicle in terms of references and materials. At present, the installation includes elements of handicraft, sculpture, and architecture, as well as the documentation from Life Construction, and reconstructions of the paper studies, which were also part of the exhibition, made for the installation by paper artist Eric Gjerde.

One of my intentions for Corresponding With was to mobilize different historical perspectives and stimulate other ways of thinking and working with archival material, which I will illustrate with three examples.

On account of the low resolution of the reproductions, I considered it necessary to treat the documentation as one element among several rather than the main focus of the display: to produce an inclusive space in which the whole assemblage would be interconnected and in flux. The documentation and the paper studies hang from the metal structure at different heights, open up different fields of vision—and with these differing perspective, different associations. The metal structure—which seen from above looks like the shape of an artificial tree—is connected by hinges and mounted on wheels, suggesting movement and change as opposed to stasis and the completion. Another approach has been to produce an excess out of the material I have worked with, finding their intrinsic generative force. For example, the diagram affixed to the ceiling within the Life Construction installation has been transformed into a set of three-dimensional textile works whose volume, texture and color suggest simple and familiar shapes reminiscent of elements from the natural environment. They are also playful forms that relate to the body, enticing viewers to explore further their sensual nature. It is important for me to create tactile works that people feel compelled to reach out and touch. It is in the desire to hold, brush and test with one’s hands that the installation’s pedagogical potential can be found.

Finally, the decision to incorporate references to the postwar artist group Jikken Kōbō (Experimental Workshop), an eclectic group of visual artists, musical composers, photographers and engineers (many of whom were self-taught) active in Tokyo between 1951 and 1957, was prompted by the desire to introduce another perspective with regards to the Bauhaus’s reception in Japan. One of Jikken Kōbō’s co-founders, Katsuhiro Yamaguchi, likened the collective to a “Bauhaus without building.” They decisively turned their back on the traditional Japanese culture implicated in World War II, instead taking inspiration from pre-war European and American avant-gardes. Adding references to Jikken Kōbō was a means of linking the firsthand experience of the Bauhaus on Japanese artists, designer and architects before the war with its subsequent diffusion as a historically-bounded phenomenon after the war, conveyed through printed matter and the recollections of the few Japanese who attended the school.

During its existence, Jikken Kōbō created multi-layered installations using sound recording, photography and film, artist-designed sets, original music compositions and choreography, producing a number of works in collaboration with external actors from a variety of creative fields, including the acclaimed modern dancers Takashi Masuda and Momoko Tani, avant-garde film director Toshio Matsumoto and actress Kyōko Kishida. (The group also created audiovisual work using a slide projector synchronized with a magnetic tape recorder, with the help of technicians who later founded Sony corporation.) In my installation, I reference their practice through the design of the modular structure, the three tatami mats, the architectural elements, the use of an easily transportable structure—as were some of their set designs, which could be paraded on stage—and in the scale model figures animating the metal structure, an homage to the role scale models played in their work process.

In any case, the Bauhaus left a profound impact on Japanese art education thanks to Renshichiro Kawakita’s work in the 1930s. This carried on into the less orthodox understanding of Jikken Kōbō, whose search for a new artistic language and a new role for art took place in the context of a rapidly changing society increasingly connected to and influenced by the mass culture of the 1950s. In this sense, Model for a Pedagogical Vehicle is an attempt to connect the original dissemination of Bauhaus pedagogy and philosophy with its later transmission following World War II, and to allude more generally to processes of adaptation and appropriation of outside influences and technology that are a hallmark of modern Japanese society.

In conclusion, I wish to look into the future by going back to the beginning of this collaboration; to be precise, to a modular furniture object, Workstation (For Marianne Brandt), consisting of three interlocking pieces. The piece was inspired by the table Brandt used for her workstation in the metalwork studio at the Bauhaus in Weimar. Through working with this object my intention was to explore the bond between the workstation and the artist—the artist and her/his tools—more than the objects created, which subsequently became iconic expressions of the Bauhaus aesthetic. I wanted to elevate this table itself to an object worthy of attention. As with Model for a Pedagogical Vehicle, the intention with Workstation (For Marianne Brandt) was to tell a story and bring it back into circulation, together with other stories, images, objects, spaces, people: to see how it can participate in the present, and contribute in its own way to new readings, interpretations and other ways of imagining the legacies of the Bauhaus, for the present and the future.

For more information and insight into Luca Frei's artistic work, please go and visit his website: www.lucafrei.info

Even though the progressive artists of the interwar period ultimately failed in their plan to realize the new, egalitarian society they had envisioned, their influence was lasting. The international avant-garde produced some of the most important artists of the twentieth century. Meanwhile, some members of the Arbeitsrat für Kunst (Workers council for art) occupied important positions at the Bauhaus—above all, its founding director Walter Gropius. → more

The works from Anna Boghiguian shown here are from an installation commissioned by the Institute of International Visual Arts (Iniva) titled A Play to Play as part of the exhibition Tagore’s Universal Allegories in 2013. These works incorporate elements associated with Tagore, from the artist’s frequent visits to Santiniketan. → more

Although the Bauhaus opened its door in 1919, it took more than three years for Gropius to fully organize the school’s faculty, since with the departure of several of the old art school’s professors, such as Max Thedy, Richard Engelmann and Walther Klemm, open positions had to be regularly filled. But Gropius’s first appointments indicated the course set toward an international avant-garde school, a school of invention. → more

Lena Bergner developed carpet patterns applying specific methods learned from Paul Klee discernible in her finished work. The results, however, are quite unique. This is precisely what Klee sought to achieve with his classes at the Bauhaus: to point to paths of design so that the formal language is not arbitrary, without, however, prescribing predetermined outcomes. → more

Kawakita called the educational activities that developed around the central axis of the School of New Architecture and Design “kōsei education.” The term “compositional/structural education” is often taken nowadays to refer to a preparatory course in composition derived from the Bauhaus—plastic arts training in which plastic elements such as color, form and materials are treated abstractly. → more

The art school Kala Bhavan was founded by the poet Rabindranath Tagore in 1919 at Santiniketan, a utopian community about 100 miles north of Calcutta established in the previous century by the poet’s father, Maharshi Devendranath Tagore. Born out of the need to rehabilitate traditional Indian culture after the demoralizing impact of British rule, the school was established as an experiment in education that broke with academic tradition, and created a form of rural modernism decoupled from industrial modernization. → more

Mazdaznan had a significant although often misunderstood impact on the life and work of Johannes Itten, a key figure in the development of the Weimar Bauhaus. A devout practitioner of Mazdaznan, he was responsible for introducing it to students of the Bauhaus in the early 1920s. This essay explores the intimate relationship between Itten, Mazdaznan and the Bauhaus and, in so doing, also underscores how in its infancy the Bauhaus was very different from its later incarnation as a school associated primarily with technical innovation. → more

Gropius wrote his Bauhaus manifesto shortly after the end of World War I. The German empire had collapsed, Russia had undergone a revolution and a second revolution in Germany was in the process of being suppressed. Throughout Germany people felt the necessity for a social and intellectual change. → more

The Otolith Group have been commissioned to produce 'The O Horizon' for bauhaus imaginista, a new film containing studies of Kala Bhavana as well as the wider environments of Santiniketan and Sriniketan. Through rare footage of art, craft, music and dance, it explores the material production of the school and its community as well as the metaphysical inclinations that guided Tagore’s approach to institution building. → more

Unlike the Bauhaus, Kala Bhavana had no written manifesto or curriculum. However, a corpus of writing developed around the school, largely produced by the school’s artists and teachers. The academic Partha Mitter, whose own writing has explored the interplay between the struggle against colonialism, modernism, and the cultural avant-garde in India, has selected a group of texts on education in Santiniketan. → more

The impact of the Bauhaus teaching methods reached far beyond Germany. Conversely, throughout its existence, a Japanese sensibility permeated the Bauhaus, springing from the Japonisme of individual professors, until its closure in 1933. This article analyzes the reciprocal impact of German and Japanese design education in the interbellum period in order to shed new light on the tightly knit network of associations then connecting Japan and Europe. → more

My artistic practice working primarily with abstract folded paper objects led me to Josef Albers and his similar obsession with paper as an instructional medium. Initially looking for pleated paper forms and to learn more about the history of these techniques, I have since been swept up in the maelstrom of Albers' pedagogical mindset. It's difficult to look at one area of his thinking and not get pulled into many other directions, finding yourself challenged at every turn. → more

In the late nineteenth century the self-styled Dr. Otoman Zar-Adusht Ha'nish founded Mazdaznan, a quasi-religious movement of vegetarian diet and body consciousness, which flourished across the USA and Europe until the 1940's. The Egyptian Postures is a guide to the most advanced Mazdaznan exercises that Johannes Itten taught his students at the Bauhaus. This edition of Dr. Otoman Zar-Adusht Ha’nish’s original instructions has been newly edited and illustrated by Ian Whittlesea with images of actor Ery Nzaramba demonstrating the postures. → more