There is an easiest gravity solution and we must always consider itseriously.

Previously I gave the solution for gravity as that of (a) unevenelectromagnetic charge distribution coupled with enormous EM power of10^40 stronger than gravity. Trouble with that solution is that westill have to account for repulsion. For why would gravity always beattraction.

So in the case of attraction or repulsion, I proposed the AtomTotality solution (b) where the Atom Totality is a electron in ourregion of Space and so all the magnetic monopoles are of one chargeonly, attraction.

However, last night I came upon the easiest solution of all. It may bethe true solution or it may just be an easier solution than (b). Thereare still many facts of the Cosmos that need to be considered, such aswhether far away distant galaxies do in fact show antigravity of arepulsion and acceleration away from one another. And our localgalaxies showing only attraction. But let me list the easiest andthird solution.

Solution (c) is the easiest of all, and it takes into account that weknow little to nothing about magnetic monopoles. Solution (c) saysthat a magnetic monopole M- is attractive to both M- and M+, and dittofor M+. Now maybe M- is more attractive to M+ rather than M-, butstill, their is no repulsion force in magnetic monopoles. There is arepulsion in magnetic dipoles, but not magnetic monopoles.

Now, we easily solve gravity because monopoles exist where mass existsand their abundance and distribution follows the abundance anddistribution of mass. So we eliminated repulsion out of EM force andgravity is thus the smallest of the Coulomb forces for it is just theattraction of magnetic monopoles.

Now, perhaps I can combine solutions (c) with (b) in that the MaxwellEquations do not support (c) in a elimination of repulsion. But if weinclude (b) of the Cosmos being a single atom of 231Pu and our localgalaxies showing only attraction force because our local galaxies arepart of the last electron Space of 231Pu, that masks the repulsion andallows only a residual attraction.

We have to keep in mind also, of patches of stronger forces of gravityas EM, for instance the Rings of Saturn as solid-body-rotation is astronger gravity field than the planets around the Sun, and the solid-body-rotation of many spiral galaxies is stronger gravity than thegravity of the planets around the Sun. So in those cases of strongergravity than the usual gravity, we have to adjust the abundance orpower of the magnetic monopoles in play.

--

Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple andfair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here: