Best fighter at 135 without proving so & beats Burns based on nothing than you claiming he has 'different skill and athleticism' without even seeing Burns in action? And you're patronising somebody else for an educated opinion? GTFO!

Oh please, his educated opinion says footwork is bad lol, and if you can spot an athlete and say they have bad footwork when in all likely hood they have great footwork then your opinion is worth nil... You Sir GTFOH

Dont take a rocket scientist to know Broner bout to run through divisions like a track athlete. You living in fantasies if you think some chump named burns even stands a chance. Thats two weight classes and two titles already 130 and 135... Burns who? You mofo's think boxing is some kind of defined art, nope. When a real athlete, (you know someone athletic) takes the sport up then combines skill with it there is no chance for the rest of these bums plain and simple. Train as hard as you want burns your talent level can max out and still not reach broner status. Different level and different skill sets.

and I'm about sick of looking through this thread with people saying Broner is OVER HYPED... Then Picking him to win by KO or UD.

Just say you dont like him and then state why. If You pick him to win he is the better fighter in your own opinion. If you dont like all the attention he gets then that is also your personal opinion but believe the hype, he is the real deal...

and I'm about sick of looking through this thread with people saying Broner is OVER HYPED... Then Picking him to win by KO or UD.

Just say you dont like him and then state why. If You pick him to win he is the better fighter in your own opinion. If you dont like all the attention he gets then that is also your personal opinion but believe the hype, he is the real deal...