Correction of year so far: Remnick's Obama book will not be pimped out

I'm not even sure what a book that wasn't pimped out would be, but this was still entertaining.

An earlier version of this post misquoted Mr. Remnick on his comparison between the book and a New Yorker article he had previously written. He said the book would not be a “pumped up” version of the article; he did not say that it would not be a “pimped out” version of the article.

The Times had a correction a year or so ago saying the director interviewed for an article had talked about liking the use of [something, I forget] in foreign films, not "porn films" as the article stated.