If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You seem oddly skeptical of a guy who's seen as one of the better evaluators in the game.

Oddly. Love it. I just thought at the time that Molina was a stat based evaluation. (highk/lowbb rate)

I know he relies on outside eyes as well as his own, but in this particular (odd?) case I think he punted on stats. I love all the guys that put their reputation on the line with the scouting lists and Sickels is one of my faves.

Oddly. Love it. I just thought at the time that Molina was a stat based evaluation. (highk/lowbb rate)

I know he relies on outside eyes as well as his own, but in this particular (odd?) case I think he punted on stats. I love all the guys that put their reputation on the line with the scouting lists and Sickels is one of my faves.

Fair enough. And I think in the case of Molina, he was off (cause Nestor isn't looking so good), but on the whole, I find him to be one of the more credible guys out there compiling prospect lists.

All I'm saying is the league wants to see Toronto succeeded. An outside chance Silver could say to philly... You know... That's a great trade offer from Toronto for the first pick. It's up to you but we'd love to see wiggins in Toronto.

i hate how rankings always over rate the guys who are strait out of the draft.

Why? Wouldn't you place a Stroman or a Davis ahead of others based on scouting reports,projection and tools? When you compile a list it's a combination of raw tools and MLB readyness. If a guy has all 5 tools, why would you place a guy who's projected to be a pen arm ahead of him? If you want overrated, look at Norris.