As the title implies, this blog is all about butt-bruising, tush-tanning, seat-smacking, heiny-heating SPANKING!
(strictly of the Female Dominant kind; here we treat
a lady with respect - except, of course, when we
want to get her mad enough to, well, you know...)

Monday, 29 June 2015

FUN 'N GAMES

My apologies for being absent for so long, but as this post is my 200th, I thought I would do something a little special, and make up for any lost time with a themed portfolio. The following is an idea for a spanking match, spanker vs spankee, with the latter actually having a chance to win out.

To play, all you need are two sturdy wooden bath brushes (actually, any spanking implement will do if it leaves a very distinct impact mark - I am suggesting bath brushes only because they not only leave a clear mark, but hurt like the dickens and give the spankee some genuine incentive to avoid them), a timer, two belts (scarves or even duct tape will do equally well), and a good amount of open space, ideally with some floor mats to avoid injury.

The spankee has his wrists bound to his legs just above the knee, thus forcing him into a permanent bent over position, but is otherwise unrestrained - though he will begin the match on all fours. The spanker is armed with a bath brush in each hand, taking a position 15 feet away:

The object is pretty simple - she has 5 minutes to deliver 10 swats to his behind. They must be clearly discernible to avoid disagreements, and must be confined to the buttocks. The object for him is equally simple - avoid getting his butt whacked. He is free to regain his feet and move about in any manner he is able to in order to protect his exposed and vulnerable posterior.

There are, however, strict rules governing the behavior of each contestant. The spankee cannot deliberately touch his pursuer in any way. He may not attempt to undo the bonds about his limbs, nor may he sit, or take a position against a wall to prevent her having fair access to her target. Violation of any of these rules involves starting the match again from the start - and she gets 2 free swats from the get-go.

As for the spanker, she must keep a weapon in each hand at all times. Dropping one requires her to immediately back off from her opponent and retrieve it. She may not slow down her quarry by deliberately hitting anywhere on his body other than his bottom; nor may she body check, trip or kick him to interfere with his movement - at least not while he is on his feet. Doing so invokes a penalty, setting her back 3 swats in her tally.

Obviously, the spankee would do well to avoid letting his adversary get around behind him-

Encumbered as he is, that will be very difficult to keep up for the entire 5 minutes. Nevertheless, even if she does outmaneuver him, he might still evade her swings if he is agile and quick enough -

Then it simply becomes a chase, and this is where the spanker really does gain the advantage -

It's a good idea to learn to roll if you stumble, as a moving target is harder to strike - but if the spanker is athletically inclined, she might score a double hit -

One more rule - Though the spanker can't physically interfere while the spankee is on his feet, if the spankee should drop a knee to the floor, she may pounce
on him, and wrestle him into a position to deliver her swats. This match is over -

So what is the victor's prize? I'll leave that one up to you....

Anyone out there willing to have a go? If so, do let us know how it works out....

I love spanking games. Have you ever played spanking rummy? My girlfriend Charlotte play it all the time. The way it works is we play a hand of 500 rummy. The winner gets to spank the husband of the loser. The difference in points between the winning hand, and the losing hand determines the number of strokes. Sometimes as an alternate instead of strokes the diffwerence in points determines the amount of time.the spanking will last.

First, congratulations on your wonderful artwork. The girl is remarkable well-built and her large breasts seem to move about quite naturally. Something tells me that if the man is "bent" towards submissive behavior or might actually enjoy this kind of thing, he likely might have an erection as well, but I'm just as glad you chose not to show this.

It seems as if the deck is pretty well stacked against the spankee: she has five whole minutes to deliver a mere ten smacks to his bottom and TWO weapons to do it with. It's likely, given the rules, that she will win at least nine times out of ten so, if this happens regularly, he must be into it. The prize for the victor (her) could be to really cut loose on him with those bathbrushes, since she seems to enjoy it, or perhaps he's required to service her sexually (orally perhaps) for the rest of the day. In the unlikely event that he is the victor, I'd guess he won't be allowed to spank or paddle her (after all, that's not the viewpoint of this blog) so, if he's lucky, he may get a blow job out of it, maybe with her mouth full of ice cubes or something. Or maybe he's allowed to fuck her. Once. At her convience... ;-)

I agree that the odds favor her - after all, it's not much of a spanking match if there isn't much spanking going on - but I think if he succeeds in continually facing her and rolling away when she get too close, he might last the whole time before taking the full ten. Of course, the time and the tally are hardly set in stone. If it's too easy for her, then the time could be shortened, or her tally raised. Or perhaps her score should be reduced for every misplaced strike. That would make her job more difficult.

On a different note: Your article in SimplySxy was brilliant. I am deeply involved with the art community and my wife is an artist..It was so nice to read your perspective on the necessity for art, at it's very core, to be about genuine self-expression - not to figure out how to make stuff others want.

In our home, it's the real deal. She is expert with disciplinary matters and I find myself identifying very directly with many of your illustrations. (In fact, she said I earned a session and it's coming - when she's ready, this week.)

Thanks so much, Tomy! I spend my day job catering to the intangible desires of the masses, and its very gratifying to allow my innermost desires free flow through this blog. Spanking art will never be a genre in the larger art world, but that's ok - the smaller community of artists who dare to explore it keeps it 'real'.

Something you said strikes a chord - 'when she's ready'. What an intriguing notion, knowing that sooner or later you're in for a 'session'. It could be today, tomorrow, or three days from now - only she knows the time. It would put me on edge all the time. Every time she walks into the room, I would be asking myself if this was the moment; every time she passed close, I would be wondering if she would suddenly take me by the arm and lead me to the spanking chair..... Must make every moment of the day more electric...

Wow, what a terrific contest between spanking female and spanked male!

Given the athleticism of the woman in these drawings, and her obvious understanding of the proper strategy to employ, I'd agree that she should win at least 90-95% of the time. One stumble by the male could quickly end the game if the female competitor is fairly strong and smart. Also, once she maneuvers behind him in a 'chasing' position, facing those vulnerable twin targets with her twin spanking brushes, I'm figuring that her chances of victory are about 98-99%.

The penalty for the male losing? I'd say playing four more games, each to the full five minutes--but with his ankles also bound together.

My darling wife isn't very strong, athletic or maneuverable, so I might have to give her a bit of that advantage--say my ankles bound twenty inches apart, along with the wrists-to-knees binding--to make her the overwhelming favorite to win. It would be an enjoyable game, even though I'd be trying to win, the idea being that the male spankee can give his best effort yet still almost certainly end up with a red, stinging bare behind in a losing effort.

"Now we know who's the better player, don't we? Let's tie your ankles together as your penalty for losing, then we'll play a few more rounds, sweetheart..." --C.K.

I like your penalty for losing - but what if he loses the penalty matches as well? He could be in for a long night.....

The odds should favor the spanker, however maybe the rules need a little adjusting to reduce her advantage - after all, it's a contest, and the spankee needs some hope of winning, otherwise the game is not very worthwhile.

And I'm not so sure the game is as one-sided as it seems - all the spankee has to do is keep facing her; it would be very difficult for her to reach around him and hit her target. I think it would end up with her doing her best to get him to stumble so she can pounce on him, rather than chasing him around the room.

Sadly, I doubt anyone out there will likely try the game. But, it was fun illustrating it, anyway.

Well, the four penalty games wouldn't necessarily involve keeping track of the blistering swats (of which there would be plenty more than ten with his ankles also bound together, I'm figuring), they'd simply be a fun/playful vehicle for the naked masculine loser to be extensively paddled by the feminine victor.

At the beginning of the game, could a fast, athletic female cover the fifteen feet to swing around her opponent before he can rise to his feet to face her? Once she's behind him I'm figuring that if she's clever she can stay there, given his somewhat limited maneuverability, then she'd have no trouble landing ten wallops to his bare behind. If he drops down to his knees, she wouldn't even have to wrestle him, since he's required to keep his buttcheeks open for her to smack, merely stand over and behind him and keep on whacking away.

Should the nude woman end up facing her male opponent at the game's beginning, she would have to 'fake him out,' starting one way and then reversing herself, or instead only pretending to before continuing in the original direction. Even should he guess right to start out with, a smart, quick female would only have to fool him once, given his restricted ability to recover, to get behind him--once she's facing his twin moons while wielding her pair of swinging hairbrushes, it shouldn't take her more than 30-45 seconds to secure the win.

I'd enjoy playing this game with my less-than-athletic spouse, but I'd have to convince her to try it out... --C.K.

Thanks, CK, for the in-depth analysis here! Great to be able to bandy back and forth on this idea with you.

Maybe a fifteen foot gap is a bit much, especially when you consider that a lot of people just don't have that much open space available ( at least indoors). The idea was to give the guy a chance to get a head start, otherwise if it's too easy for her to get him where she wants him, there might as well not even be a contest at all.

I am not sure that if she succeeded in getting in his six o'clock, that she could easily maintain it - after all, he need only pivot on one foot to completely negate her advantage, forcing her to somehow get all the way around behind him again. Rather than try to out maneuver him, a more effective tactic might be for her to get right in his face, forcing him to either back up or sidestep, which would not be easy in his bent over posture - he chances of stumbling would be high.

Even if he's down on his knees and she is behind him, there is nothing to prevent him from simply rolling away from her. Now, if he were then to simply lie on his back, she would have trouble striking her target, so that's when she would have to get down and dirty with him on the floor....Even then her task is not a simple one - remember, she cannot use her hands, as she must hold on to the brushes at all times, or back off. She can't kick, though she can use her feet to hold him down or shove him over when he tries to rise....

Alas, we will never truly know the ins and outs of how the contest would work until someone is daring enough to try it....

Oh man those drawings. I mean really, WOW. This is so erotic and wery well drawn, I'm speechless. The anatomy, and their expressions, the dynamism in their movements...not to mention the fact that he is able to see her naked body, even if he has to focus on avoiding her...which is arousing and distracting at the same time, to add more difficult to the game. That's a hell of a 200th post, bravo! Definitely give us more of that, please!(I don't know...I think I could try that with my wife, but maybe with hairbrush...if I want at least a chance to win.)

Thanks so much - I am delighted you like the drawings as much as I had fun doing them.Interesting point about the distraction of her nakedness - he best keep his mind on the business at hand, or he is very quickly going to pay the price.My guess is that a hairbrush might make things more difficult for her, as she doesn't have the range that a long-handled bath brush has. She would have to get much closer to her target to make a strike. On the other hand, if it devolves into a wrestling match, then it would be easier for her to wrestle with hairbrushes than with two long 'clubs' in her hands.

Great series of art pieces.You've really captured the motion and energy of the 'contestants'. While it looks almost like a progression of one event; the participants appear to all be different. My favorite is the last one where his head is squeezed into her crotch with her legs and her left arm has his leg pulled up, exposing his butt to her strong right hand and brush Very clever and we definitely have a victor. Prize should be he gets to finish what he's doing now and gets a 'proper spanking' when he's done.I'm predominately M/F but have been known to switch roles. Unfortunately I'm not young anymore and if my younger wife and I tried to play.your very intriguing game; she definitely win as I'd never be able to gain my feet before she pounced on me. Probably wouldn't take her but 2 seconds to cover 15 feet. It's a shame you aren't a 'switch' artist and do some M/F art as well. I know they'd be great also. ..

Happy 200th, and a great post. Love the drawings, and the wonderful imagination in dreaming up this game. I would however be afraid that so strong an implement might hit the bone instead of the intended target.bottoms upRed

Tried this with my "lady friend" over the weekend. We didn't have two bath brushes, so she was armed with a bath brush and a ping pong paddle. Long-range and short-range weapons?

It didn't really go as planned. It turns out starting on all fours is a big disadvantage -- it takes some time to get up from that position with your hands tied to your knees. She just ran over to me before I managed to get up and hip-checked me to the ground. After a short, futile struggle (you can't really grapple with no hands) she got me into a position similar to the one in the last drawing and beat my bare ass with the bath brush for what was left of the 5 minutes.