Breaking News - December 8th 2014 - Fifty Common Law Grand Juries filed Presentments indicting Code Enforcement Officer Pantaleo for the murder of Eric Garner in the United States District Court for the Southern District of NY: Read the Presentment HERE > Officer_Pantaleo_NY._Presentment.pdffor the murder of Eric Garner

Breaking News November 10, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury in every State files writ_quo_warranto.pdf in every Federal District Court, United States Supreme Court and served upon every Federal Judge and all 9 US Supreme Court Justices, see video below.

Breaking News October 29, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury files mandamus.pdf ordering Federal Judge to show cause why he did not obey the Law of the Land

BREAKING NEWS October 17, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury granted Terry Trussell's petition for Writ Habaes Corpus - Terry was asked to serve on a statutory grand jury in Dixie County. He was selected by the presiding Judge Munkittrick as the foreman. As foreman, he was made aware of alleged criminal behavior by those government officials pushing Common Core curriculum in our public schools , who allegedly took bribes of money to change the curriculum. So, according to his duty, Terry tried to present the evidence to the statutory grand jury but the State Attorney Siegmeister interfered with his ability to perform the job of Grand Jury Foreman as per Florida Grand Jury Handbook and Florida Statutes 905.

So Terry wrote up and put into the public record a Bill of Information that included criminal charges of obstruction of justice along with jury tampering for the SA, and also hand delivered a 7 page letter to Judge Munkittrick , among other things, detailing to her the alleged felonies that he had witnessed Siegmesiter commit. Due to the actions of Seigmesiter, Terry declared the statutory grand jury as tainted and dismissed it.

Nothing happened so Terry was in a position where his sworn duty was to investigate any crime that came to his awareness according to Florida Statutes but the statutory grand jury had become tainted by State Attorney Seigmesiter. So Terry, knowing that the US is a Common Law Country and Florida is a Common Law state, asked the People of Dixie County if they wanted to, in accordance with the 5th amendment to our US Constitution, stand up their own independent Common Law Grand Jury, which they did. After considering the evidence, The People's Grand Jury Under Common Law in Dixie County handed down two True Bills of Presentment, one against the alleged crimes of the SA and the other against the officials, after accepting money, pushing Common Core. This True Bills were also put into the public record.

In an act of retaliation against Terry for reporting crimes, the establishment is attacking Terry for doing his job as Grand Jury Foreman by reporting the True Bills and putting them into the public record. A Florida Department of Law Enforcement agent Frank Linton filed a defective affidavit, including with perjury and omission of exculpatory evidence, which Terry rebutted, but the Court Clerk has removed evidence from the public record. Also, the judge's order was defective as well as the arrest warrant was defective, all for various serious reasons.

So Terry is charged for crimes because he reported crimes, and he was first in early Sept, kept in jail about 24 hours, and bailed out. He then was arrested at his arraignment Oct 9 on charges of Failure to Appear because he did appear but the judge refused to recognize him. Pls go to www.jasonwhoyt.com and find all the articles and audio on Terry. You can listen to Judge Hankinson call Terry's name 3 times, and Terry respond three times, and then the judge can be heard to say something like ...let the record show that Terry George Trussell did not appear, and I order his bail revoked and his immediate arrest. The sheriffs simply walked over and took Terry by the arm and lead him out of the court room and handcuffed him and took him to jail. There are over 20 signed, sworn, notarized affidavits that Terry did indeed appear even though the judge said he did not.

The coverup that is being engineered to hide criminal activity and to punish Terry appears to include many officials in both the county government and in the Circuit Court judicial system as well as FDLE. Please remember that as a Grand Juror, Terry has complete immunity for anything he does except for if he were to breach a witnesses rights. Since there were no witnesses called, he certainly did not breach anybody's rights. As a result on October 17, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury granted Terry Trussell's petition for Writ Habaes Corpus. see petition and Habaes Corpus below.

BREAKING NEWS SEPTEMBER 16, 2014: In-Depth Interview with Terry Trussell of Dixie County, FL - Arrested by a Corrupt Judiciary. On Friday, September 12th, 2014, on the 5-year anniversary of the 9/12 March On Washington where 1.2 million people gathered in protest of the despicable behavior by their representatives in Washington, D.C., Terry Trussell of Dixie County, FL and I sat down for an in-depth interview to discuss why he was arrested and charged with several felonies. On September 2nd, 2014 just after 3:00 PM in the afternoon, Terry Trussell's life was changed forever. terry_trussell_interview.mp3

Consolidated True Bill.pdf Filed July 14th 2014 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York In one federal filing we refiled the indictments of 14 State judges and 2 clerks.

Bill of Information.pdfFiled July 14th 2014 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York Paper revealing that New York courts are controled by tyrants.

Hybrid papers disclaimer.pdf The purpose of this disclaimer is to deny any connection with Mr. Joaquin Mariano DeMoreta-Folch, who titles himself a God Grace Administrator, concerning his filing of papers in Sheridan County, Nebraska and any other papers he may have filed in other states/counties.

PRESS RELEASE DISCLAIMER.pdfThe purpose of this disclaimer is to deny any connection with David Robinson’s PRESS RELEASE For JULY 4, 2014. NLA does not support or share the views of the following contents.

POSTED MAY 27, 2014 Federal Court Order to dismiss case and our response with a writ of error and an ultimatum. Take note that in the file Mandamus there is one Mandamus commanding the Federal Court to obey and a second (to be signed by the judge) from the Federal Court to the State courts.

NY SUPREME COURT, GREEN COUNTY COURTHOUSE; 320 Main Street; Catskill, NY 12414 - POSTPONED AGAINPHONE - (518) 625-3160; FAX - (518) 943-0247If you need assistance with coordinating travel from your area, you may call or email Ollie Johnson, one of the NY State coordinators at (845) 204-8158 and mroliverw@gmail.comCourt Hearing Thursday April 24, 2014 at 9:3o AM. If you cannot make it please fax, mail and call to let them know we are watching.

On March 28, 2014 the Columbia County Clerk retured our March 26th filing. We then filed the Writ of Quo Warranto, Writ of Probition and Writ of Mandamus.pdf with the Greene Couty Clerk on April 10, 2014and our hearing is now scheduled for Thursday, April 24, 2014 at 9:30 AM.

Posted Tuesday March 10, 20144th Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic -Letter from Franklin County New York Sheriff to the Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury and the UNYCLGJ response -Franklin Sheriff letter and response.pdf

Posted Monday, February 10, 2014New York Unified Common Law Grand Jury Indicts Green County Judge and Court Clerk for Felony Rescue and other charges.Presentment 2-10-14.pdf, withletter.pdf to judge

1st Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic - 14-2-10 MEMORANDUM.pdf

Posted Monday, January 20, 2014 Saint Johns County Florida Common Law Grand Jury files Writ of Mandamus.pdf demanding access in the courthouse in order to function under judicial auspices.

Posted Wednesday, January 1, 2014From the Unified New York Supreme Court Bench to Greene County New York Supreme Court - Mandamus to Judge.pdf and Mandamus to Clerk.pdf Final notice to be delivered by sheriff Monday January 6, 2014.

Published: Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, 12:01 a.m.Citizens group wants common law grand jury in Westmoreland County

Friday - November 8, 2013, By Rich Cholodofsky, A citizens group filed court documents on Friday seeking to convene a common law grand jury in Westmoreland County, but legal experts say such a body has no real authority. More...

November 4, 2013 -Common Law Grand Jury files Quo Warranto.pdfwith Greene County Supreme Court for hesitating to process True Bill of Indictment, against their colleagues, as required by law for arraignment, scheduling, and the removal from office ... For more details read the Quo Warranto.

October 31, 2013Blog Talk Radio with Drake Bailey's interview with John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement, who explains how Liberty’s Light is moving across America by the constituting of Common Law Juries in all 3141 counties which has taken deep roots, now in 48 states, in just four short months.

COPY OF FILED INDICTMENTPresentment 10-21-13-1.pdfOn Wednesday, October 23, 2013 an indictment was handed down, and filed at the New York Supreme Court, Greene County; located at 320 Main Street Catskill, NY by (Eighteen) Unified New York Common Law Grand Juries from Bronx County, Columbia County, Dutchess County, Greene County, Kings County, Nassau County, New York County, Orange County, Putnam County, Queens County, Rockland County, Sullivan County, Suffolk County, Westchester County, Niagara County, Ulster County, Monroe County, and Schenectady County of New York; against New York (1) Supreme Court Chief Administrative Judge A. Gail Prudenti; (2) Deputy Chief Judge Michael V. Coccoma; (3) Suffolk County District Administrative Judge Judge C. Randall Hinrichs; and (4) Administrative Judge Allan D. Scheinkman, 9th Judicial District; for High Treason, Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, RICO, and eleven other charges.

October 21, 2013 - Press Release 10-21-13.pdfReleased by PressAgent@NationalLibertyAlliance.orgNew York is “ground zero” - A major grassroots’ movement that started in New York with the constituting of its first Common Law Grand Jury on July 18, 2013 has taken America by storm, spreading to 48 States in just a few months. New York has constituted Grand Juries in the Bronx, New York, Kings, Queens, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, Orange, Sullivan, Ulster, Dutchess, Columbia, Greene, Schenectady, Monroe and Niagara counties in just three months, by people keen on setting the brush fires of freedom in the minds of men.

On the other hand, our hired servants prefer the status quo, thereby they're not too keen to receive the People back in control of the Peoples judicial and political processes. Lysander Spooner, author of Trial by Jury (1852) said: “any government, that is its own judge of, and determines authoritatively for, the people, what its own powers are over the people, is an absolute government, of course. It has all the powers that it chooses to exercise. There is no other, or at least, no more accurate definition of despotism than this”. Thomas Jefferson in writing the Declaration of Independence said: “That to secure Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”. It is the People (Grand Jury) that consent to government. To dismiss the Common Law Grand Jury is to dismiss the Bill of Rights and reject our founding document, the Declaration of Independence.

The Common Law Grand Jury is an unalienable right, protected under the Law by the Fifth Amendment. Common Law is synonymous with Natural Law which can never be codified or supplanted, for Common Law is our American Heritage, born of the Declaration of Independence. But four New York Supreme Court Judges would have us believe that Common Law can be superseded by four progressive judges in the (1961) case Wood v Hughes. To the contrary, in a stunning six to three (1992) Decision that went unnoticed, until now, Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said: “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. “It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”... “Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby, created a "buffer" the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.”… “The common law of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury”… “It is in effect a fourth branch of government governed and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights”. Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present "True Bills" of indictment to the court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding.

Furthermore, on "Constitutional Issues" the United States Supreme Court rulings are the "Law of the Land" (unless repugnant to the same) and therefore over rules all State Supreme Court rulings.

Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman have taken it upon themselves to prevent the 18 New York constituted Common Law Grand Juries from taking their inherited seats as consentors. These judges have filed false reports with the FBI on at least three different occasions and have threatened We the People, claiming there would be “Regrettable legal consequences” should We the People continue in pursuit of our unalienable right to consent, established under the Declaration of Independence and protected under the Fifth Amendment.

On October 15, 2013 the Unified (18) Common Law Grand Juries answered Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman with a final letter, citing acts of treason and giving them until Friday, October 18th to obey the People and step aside or face the consequences of indictment by presentment of a True Bill. 10-15-13 Letter to Judges.pdf

On Thursday, October 17th 2013, at 3:22 PM Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman replied … “your correspondence is based on an erroneous reading of the law, and is hereby rejected”. Therefore said True Bill was filed with the court Monday October 21, 2013, by certified mail. Presentment 10-21-13-1.pdf

We The People , can only succeed if We band together with the Law on Our side. We must vote out all the enemies of We The People and put in Office We The People. First step VOTE for a new Governor. Make sure that person is one of We The People. Next step VOTE out all State Representatives that are not We The People. The We The People Governor can then stop the Tyranny and bring Tyrants to justices. We The People can accomplish Our goal by putting US in Office.

It seems to me after years of debating the state of our enslavement, steps to reducing our chains locked tight by those people we elected !
It has become 'normal' for our elected officials to accept bribes, so normal that without bribery the usual candidate to state office or above cannot be elected. Bribery by Lobbyist is the main financial instrument used to finance 95% of the candidate's in America.
Bribery is stronger than reason and common sense combined, and until we make bribery a felony, our elected officials will never put the needs of the people above the request of corporations.

This was given to me by a friend. Check it out. It may be useful. Make sure any and all credit goes to Eric Williams. The Radical in the Twilight Zone.

Hi Group,

Here below is a generic version of a Notice and Demand that can be filed in regard to any manner of charges brought against you by any level of government. The one and only primary first issue in every case is jurisdiction, either political or civil. This has nothing to do with the charges, this is more fundamental!

Political jurisdiction is restricted to citizenship. No matter what you might have claimed, it makes no difference. The burden is on the charging party to prove it gained jurisdiction in conformance to the 13th Amendment.

Civil jurisdiction has to do with your presentation of your birth certificate to be issued a driver license. Again, it makes no difference what you might have done, the state, charging party must present proof that it did not violate the 13th Amendment in gaining jurisdiction over you. This is totally impossible!

DO NOT make any changes to this N&D other than the obvious name, state case number and such. DO NOT add any manner of Paytri-Idiocy or it will not work, and you do NOT go to court.

You serve this on the prosecutor's office and file a copy with the court clerk as soon as possible after you are issued a citation or other manner of charging document.

Be sure to serve and file a Certificate of Service with the N&D you serve on the prosecutor and the copy you file with the court clerk.

Take an extra copy of all documents with you for the court clerk to file stamp for your records.

It makes no difference that the prosecutor in your state does not come to traffic court - serve him anyway!!! No matter, it is the state that is charging you, the Executive Branch, NOT the court!!!.

Any response from the court is invalid! Read the 23 appellate court cases. They establish that once jurisdiction is challenged it must be proved on the record. The court has no standing to do anything whatsoever, once jurisdiction is challenged, not until jurisdiction is established by the charging party, not claimed by the court. Or claimed by the charging pasrty.

The Executive branch must explain how it got jurisdiction over you without the state violating the Federal 13th Amendment. This is NOT possible, because the state would have to present proof that you were fully informed and then gave up you freedom, intentionally. When did you do that?

Be sure to number all the pages at the bottom center. Be sure to center all headings. Most important, YOU DO NOT GO TO COURT!!! If you do, you will lose.

The judge is an expert at tripping you up. STAY HOME. This N&D covers your not going to court. DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING in this other than what I mentioned herein above, and also indicated in two places in the document.

This is under Common Law Copyright, no other changes allowed. This is very similar to the IRS letters that I have posted here.

Be sure to copy down and include the 23 appellate court cases I have posted here, and include as exhibit "A" to this N&D.

Cheers,

I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone

District Court of ______ County

STATE OF INSANITY

STATE OF INSANITY Plaintiff

vs. Case # __________

Abraham Lincoln Wrongly Accused

NOTICE (In Lieu of Motion)

OF MY CHALLENGE TO THE

POLITICAL JURISDICTION OF STATE OF INSANITY

OVER ME AND DEMAND

THAT ALL CHARGES AGAINST

ME BE DISMISSED AS STATE OF INSANITY CANNOT

PROPERLY ESTABLISH THAT IT HAS

POLITICAL OR CIVIL CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION

OVER ME

The issues

1. This is a challenge to the Political and or civil contractual Jurisdiction of the Charging party, such being the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity, and NOT to this Honorable Court (more on this below).

2. It is the responsibility of the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity, to present its proof, from its existing files, that it has in some manner, in conformance to the restriction set forth and established in the Thirteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, that the State of Insanity has gained my voluntary agreement to be subservient to the Political or civil contractual Jurisdiction of the State of Insanity.

3. As State of Insanity has no ability to establish that State of Insanity has political or civil contractual jurisdiction over me, as is required of State of Insanity, under the prohibition of involuntary servitude mandate, established in the Thirteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, this Honorable Court has no standing to proceed, and this Honorable Court has no standing to inquire of me as to my political or civil contractual status, for this Honorable Court to do so would indicate this court to be biased against me, in favor of the charging party. Such action would constitute a violation of the Separation Of Powers Doctrine, and disqualify the judge of this Honorable Court from any further participation in this matter.

4. Please find attached hereto and incorporated herein in full by this reference, as Exhibit "A" hereto, a list of twenty-three (23) appellate court case citations that establish that when jurisdiction (of any manner), is challenged, it must be proved, on the record, by the moving party, the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity, not by the judge of this Honorable Court.

5. It is clearly self evident that the Thirteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution causes the admonitions in these 23 appellate court cases to apply reasonably, in this instant case, to the charging party, the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity, and NOT to directly to this Honorable Court. However, as a subdivision of the State of Insanity, this Honorable Court has no standing to proceed against me, unless and until the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity presents its proof, from its files existing at the time and on the date I was wrongly charged, that such State then had and now has properly gained Political and or civil contractual Jurisdiction over me. And that the State of Insanity has gained such jurisdiction in full compliance with and not in violation of the restrictions established in the Thirteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution.

6. The State of Insanity(through either its Administrative/Judicial Branch or its Executive Branch), does not have standing to interrogate me in order to establish that it had Political or civil contractual jurisdiction over me at the time and date I was wrongly charged by the issuing officer of the State of Insanity Police, and certainly do not have standing to attempt to establish such jurisdiction to be effective at this late date.

7. The State of Insanity must present its proof from its existing files, and if the State of Insanity claims to have such proof, such must be presented to me in writing, and I must be accorded a reasonable opportunity to subpoena witnesses and gather evidence in opposition.

8. As it is a foregone conclusion that the Executive Branch of the Government of State of Insanity will not be able to present any acceptable proof, because any proof that it might present would have been obtained through fraudulent inducement, not through any honorable and forthright means.

9. In consideration of the foregoing, this Honorable Court has no option, other than to dismiss all charges lodged against me by the Executive Branch of the Government of the State of Insanity.

[SEE possible paragraph 10 below. If inappropriate to your case, then renumber following paragraphs. Enter hash marks /// as appropriate on blank libnes at bottom of page to push new heading to next page if there would be at least two lines of next paragraph beneath heading. Center all headings].

Discussion

11. The issue of this Notice and Demand is limited to examining the issue of whether or not the State of Insanity can present proof that it has political or civil contractual jurisdiction over me.

12. The relationship of my standing to the State of Insanity is a political issue based on the State of Insanities compliance with the Federal Thirteenth Amendment, it is not a judicial issue. This court does not have standing to determine my political status any more than would this court have standing to determine the political status of the Queen of England.

13. This is true because the political status of everyone can only be determined by the voluntary act of each individual, based on their own individual choice, as is clearly established in the prohibition of involuntary servitude, set forth and established in the Thirteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution.

14. The burden of proof in on the charging party, to present its proof from its existing files, that it gained political or civil jurisdiction over me without violating the prohibition of involuntary servitude recognized and incorporated into the Federal Constitution, in the Thirteenth Amendment thereto.

I, Abraham Lincoln, Wrongly Accused, respectfully Demand that the charges lodged against me be dismissed due to the fact that State of Insanity has no legitimate claim of Political or Civil contractual Jurisdiction over me. This wording should be removed if no such funds were paid. That the judge of this Honorable Court order the Clerk of this Honorable Court, to issue a check payable to Abraham Lincoln, refunding to Abraham Lincoln the money I was required to pay to secure my release from the unlawful arrest I was subjected to by this Honorable Court], and that I be accorded any and all additional relief to which I might be entitled.

ADDITIONAL NOTICE TO

THIS HONORABLE COURT

Due to the fact that it will not be possible for the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity to present proof, in conformance with the Federal Thirteenth Amendment, that the State of Insanity has properly gained either Political or Civil Contractual Jurisdiction over me, I Abraham Lincoln, will not present myself to this Honorable Court unless and until the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity presents to me its proof that it has such dominion over me, which I am not able to refute.

Let this Honorable Court and the State of Insanity be hereby advised, should the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity present such proof to me, in writing, that I cannot refute, I will then conform to any order of this Honorable Court.

NOTICE TO STATE OF INSANITY

LAW ENFORCEMENT

A certified copy of this Notice and Demand, duly file stamped by the Clerk of this Honorable Court, when presented to any State of Insanity Law Enforcement Officer, shall serve as Official Notice to such officer, that the State of Insanity has no dominion over Abraham Lincoln, and such officer shall not further interfere with the travels of Abraham Lincoln upon the highways of the State of Insanity.

Proceeding at all times under Threat, Duress and Coercion

____________________________

Abraham Lincoln

c/o P.O. Box xx, AnyTown, AnyState 12345

January 8, 2015

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

See note above in regard to the below:

10. Let this Honorable Court be informed, the not-guilty plea that it purported to enter on my behalf was well after I had informed this Honorable Court that I was challenging the jurisdiction of the State of Insanity. this court was well advised and therefore had no standing to enter such plea, and such plea, in any event in now totally void and of no effect, and will remain so unless and until the Executive Branch of the State of Insanity presents to me, its written proof that it has properly obtained any manner or form of jurisdiction over me, as is required under the Federal Thirteenth Amendment and the 23 appellate court case citations attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

1. A court may not render a judgment which transcends the limits of its authority, and a judgment is void if it is beyond the powers granted to the court by the law of its organization, even where the court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter. Thus, if a court is authorized by statute to entertain jurisdiction in a particular case only, and undertakes to exercise the jurisdiction conferred in a case to which the statute has no application, the judgment rendered is void.

2. The lack of statutory authority to make particular order or a judgment is akin to lack of subject matter jurisdiction and is subject to collateral attack. 46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments § 25, pp. 388-89.

3. A void judgment is to be distinguished from an erroneous one, in that the latter is subject only to direct attack. A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without legal effect. Lubben v. Selective Service System, 453 F.2d 645, 649 (1st Cir. 1972)

4. A judgment rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant is void. It is a nullity. [A judgment shown to be void for lack of personal service on the defendant is a nullity.] Sramek v. Sramek, 17 Kan. App. 2d 573, 576-77, 840 P.2d 553 (1992), rev. denied 252 Kan. 1093 (1993).

5. "Where there are no depositions, admissions, or affidavits the court has no facts to rely on for a summary determination." Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D.C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647.

6. "A court cannot confer jurisdiction where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. It is clear and well established law that a void order can be challenged in any court", OLD WAYNE MUT. L. ASSOC. v. McDONOUGH, 204 U. S. 8, 27 S. Ct. 236 (1907).

7. "The law is well-settled that a void order or judgement is void even before reversal", VALLEY v. NORTHERN FIRE & MARINE INS. CO., 254 u.s. 348, 41 S. Ct. 116 ( 1920 )

8. "Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgements and orders are regarded as nullities ; they are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal." WILLIAMSON v. BERRY, 8 HOW. 945, 540 12 L. Ed. 1170, 1189 ( 1850 ).

9. "Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but rather should dismiss the action." Melo v. U.S. 505 F 2d 1026.

10. "There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction." Joyce v. U.S. 474 2D 215.

22. Since jurisdiction is fundamental, and it is jurisdiction alone that gives a court power to hear, determine, and pronounce judgment on the issues before it, jurisdiction must be continuing in the court throughout the proceedings, Re. Cavitt, 254 P.599

23. Since jurisdiction is fundamental to any valid judicial proceeding, the first question that must be determined by a trial court in any case is that of jurisdiction, Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P,27.

I emailed my Sheriff and sent a copy of Duty of the Sheriff, and this is what he sent me. Interesting.

Tosheriff@co.nye.nv.us
Dec 27 at 5:43 PM
Hello Sheriff,
I am fairly new to Pahrump, but I want to say, I love it here. I am a disabled Vietnam Vet. I got on the website and was reading the history of the Sheriff. Be Honest with you, I was a little disappointed with that write up. The Sheriff holds a much higher status than what was expressed there. I wonder if the Sheriff and the deputies really know how much power they hold. I am sending you an attachment that will tell you how the public needs to view the Sheriff. Maybe you can incorporate it into your website. The Sheriff is the Supreme Law of the Land. The Sheriff acting along with the Common Law Grand Jury can arrest the Governor, the Attorney General, and even the President.

Thank you for your service.

Rob McElwain

Dear Rob

The duties of the Sheriff posted is from the National Sheriff's Association, that being said the duties of a Sheriff vary from state to state and can from Jurisdiction to jurisdiction, depending upon whether it is a home rule state or Dillon's rule state . Sheriff's fall into 3 categories restricted, limited, and full authority

For instance in New York City the sheriff there is appointed to cover the 5 borough's or counties, and can only do civil service, evictions, repo's etc., not patrol, or jail duties.

In other jurisdictions only either jail, or only civil, or only court, this is restricted Sheriff's, limited maybe only civil and jail, this is limited, and full patrol, civil, and jail, full authority Sheriff's.

In Connecticut there are no Sheriff's they were eliminated in the 1990's I believe. In Delaware restricted authority.

There are Sheriff Departments, and Sheriff Office and distinct difference in that. Every state by their laws places the authority and restrictions on Sheriff's even elected ones.

Contrary to belief a Sheriff is not the supreme law of the land, the US Constitution is the supreme law, and we do not have the ability to arrest the President, our constitution and law establish a process to deal with a President who violates law.

We can only arrest those who commit an actual crime and only if that crime occurs within our jurisdiction unless the person has a warrant for arrest and the warrant gives us the ability within jurisdiction. We have many living here with open warrants from other jurisdictions but have limited extinction ability, I.e. Clark county only.

Grand juries can only hear cases of crimes in the jurisdiction they are empowered in.

First a policing agency is empowered by the people they serve, as is all in government. In short a government by the people's for the people.

There are those that advocate wrongly that we hold the authority they state, fail to understand that there are limits. We are a government of checks and balances.

I am also a Vietnam Vet and have been in law enforcement for over 40 years, and while I have stood against illegal acts not only by criminals also by the federal who wanted to commit illegal seizures of cattle, etc., and local government the Town Board when they tried to pass unconstitutional law. Only because they were violating the law, and/or Constitution.

I appreciate the information, truly. We do not have unlimited authority and are not the most powerful. The people we serve are, by the documents that created our form of government, remember "We the People."

All economics is government and all government is economice; when you base the creation of your national currency on Natural Rights then you have rule of Law and Common Law and the Power of Law! A National Currency is allegiance and worship; let US not worship idols and greed above rights and true love with God = true Good. Thank you all very much for your dilligence and commitment to creating a better world.

The Sheriff is very grounded in reality and good sense; One person even the President can not force people or goverment to be good. The most Powerful Law is the Law of National Currency; If the currency is not created based on knowledge and allegiance to natural Constitutional Common Law Rights; then you do not have rule of Law or Common Law; you have a common double standard of deception and treason= rule of corrupt Power. We can not serve two contradicting Masters!

I have a case pending that is colored up to look like a child support case but is in reality an attempt to take a hostage and demend a ransome. My kids are all grown and have kids of their own after all. I have been studying the common law to prep for trial but really have butterflies when thinking about raising these constitutional issues in court. I was hoping to build my confidence level with the things I learned here but at the end of the day, this being my first time in court, what is going to happen if I blow it? Will I end up in jail? will I have to sell my house to service a support order that was satisfied 5 years ago? does anyone know of a case or cases that I could study just to build a proper frame of mind prior to game day? Thank you for what you all do here. Heaven knows I would be hopeless if you were not here...

Why are SHERIFFS involved in obviously CIVIL CASES and allowing the JUDGE and the STATE SAAG( Special assistant to the Attorney General) to effect an arrest? and how can they serve Bench warrants without PROBABLE CAUSE in these civil cases? There is NO PROBABLE CAUSE in CIVIL CASES,yet all language deems the acts by these STATE ACTORS, as ARRESTS.

The sheriff's department is a Title IVD contractor, the hearing and warrants they issue are under contract with the executive branch umbrella agency the Department of Human Services, under this disguise the Child Support enforcement agency hires out the clerks, judges, and sheriffs and they are the direct benefits of any past due child support collections, not the son or daughter they claim is being supported

I was there and saw it myself. The Raymond Senate building, Washington DC December 10, 2014. More than 200 sheriffs, from all over the country, arrived to notify congress they will not enforce any illegal laws in their state, that includes amnesty for illegal aliens. I was there, along with about 100 other people to show the sheriffs they have the support of the people, and any politician who will retaliate against the sheriff will be thrown out of office. I met these Sheriffs. They stiood tall, proud, honorable, and looking like protectors of the constitution. All the sheriffs now know their authority is supreme to the federal government. This fact was specifically shown in 1994 when Sherriff Richard Mack, of AZ, won a lawsuit against the Clinton administration for trying to impose a gun ban bill on the sate. It is time to expose the police as mere code enforcement officers, and the Sherriff as the only true law enforcement officer in the country. Sheriffs all over the country are recognizing they have the legal and moral obligation to arrest code enforcement officers, politicians, judges, legislators, governors, even other sheriffs for failure to uphold their oath of office, which is to defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. I recommend having, as a saved phone number, the name and number of your local sheriff. Take a chance to meet in person. Notify the sheriff of their sworn duty and that the sheriff has your full support. Local sheriffs have a fear of political retribution, so they don’t act against the frauds upon the people. If the sheriff will protect you from them, you have to do your part to protect the sheriff from them with your voice and your vote.

I'll agree to disagree with you. Your comments bring in to question what it is you are doing on this web site or being involved with the NLA in the first place, as you seem to have no issue with the corrupt status quo...

No Sir. I do not accept the status quo. My local code enforcement board hates me with a passion. I'm just trying to understand what NLA bring to us that is different that what the laws give us. I was told that the gj can't bring presentments or do independent investigations. Yet when I do the research I find that the laws DO allow the gj to do independent investigations and make presentments. Why is asking questions about this so upsetting to people?

I guess if we can't discuss the topic all we have left is to agree to disagree.

I hope that these positive changes can be made in our lifetimes. Whether we will be successful or not I do not know. But I do know that We the People have no chance left at all unless we continue working towards succeeding in these goals. They are well worth fighting for. The BLM situation you mentioned is something I am not aware of but I appreciate the information and I will look into it. Thanks!

How do I know? I worked for 11 years at a major metropolitan DA's Office and prior to that I appeared before GJ's on felony cases as a witness, while a deputy sheriff. So I am intimately familiar with the process firsthand, how about you? The statute you cite looks great on paper but in my experience - which is the only thing I can testify to and it was not in NY - is not being followed where I worked. And due to the state our country is in, I highly doubt that GJ's are not also being manipulated elsewhere, too. Despite what the laws say, the process is still being manipulated. Otherwise, how do you explain what happened in the Eric Garner case?

Beware taking at face value what the government claims. The proof is not in their claimed procedures but in how they actually operate and the action (or inaction) they take.

When a grand juror attempts to act outside of what a prosecutor wants, what happens is the situation with Terry Trussell in Florida and his being charged with numerous felonies...

"When a grand juror attempts to act outside of what a prosecutor wants, what happens is the situation with Terry Trussell in Florida and his being charged with numerous felonies..."

No Sir, Terry acted outside the laws of the State of Florida. I was there.

"Despite what the laws say, the process is still being manipulated. Otherwise, how do you explain what happened in the Eric Garner case?"

Garner resisted arrest and died of a coronary, not a chock hold.

The link I provided was to the gj handbook. The PEOPLE are given the information about the power to investigate that they have, why do you maintain they are not?

As to Nevada grand juries to investigate state affairs and state officers:

NRS 6.135 Impaneling of grand juries to investigate state affairs; payment of expenses.
1. Upon request of the Governor, or of the Legislature by concurrent resolution, the district judge of any county shall cause a grand jury to be impaneled in the same manner as other grand juries are impaneled, except that the sole duty of a grand jury impaneled under the provisions of this section shall limit its investigations to state affairs, and to the conduct of state officers and employees. The report of such grand jury shall be transmitted to the Governor and the Legislature.

The banning of her husband that member Loveym mentions here, and that some other members have responded to over the past few days, has been resolved. I would like to thank Loveym here for bringing this to our attention here in Nevada.

Correct me if I am wrong.
The people who sit on the Grand Jury that they use today, like the one that did not indict the code enforcement officer in the Eric Garner case, don't know what power they hold. Any member of any Grand Jury has the power to initiate an investigation into any government official and serve a true Quo Warranto to those individuals, at any time. Why can't we use their Grand Juries against them.

Dear hoagie1: The GJ's under the present system cannot be used against "them" (government officials and others with enough political influence) because they (DA's, prosecutors) completely control what evidence the GJ sees and the laws that the GJ can vote on whether to indict or not. This is why the code enforcement officer in the Eric Garner case was not indicted. And it is why cases of such clear wrongdoing continue to have the guilty almost never held criminally accountable. So a GJ under the existing system is not given the means to do anything other than what a prosecutor wants. Period. And that prosecutor serves a corrupt system.

On the other hand, CLGJ's belong to We the People and operate independently. Not under the influence of a corrupted system. And this is what we are working toward establishing. So much of what is negative and hurtful in our country can finally be fixed when the corrupt and the criminal elements (in government and elsewhere) can finally be held accountable to the law as it should have been all along.

Thank you NevadaRob for that. I guess what you are saying is, it can probably be done, but not in my lifetime, or it should be done like that, but not right now. I do agree this CLGJ is the way to approach this, here and now.
I have a question. I heard on the Pete Santilli Show today, that there is going to be something big starting in Nevada real soon. Having to do with the BLM trying to take 3 million acres of land. John Darash is going to be on his show on Wed. 12/17/2014 to talk about it. Can you elaborate on that at all and maybe prepare us for what is coming.
Thank you

I don't know why you claim the grand jury has no control and that the "DAs completely control what evidence the GJ sees and the laws that the GJ can vote on... This is why the code enforcement officer in the Eric Garner case was not indicted. "

This is from the State of New York's grand jury handbook:

"§ 190.50 Grand jury; who may call witnesses; defendant as
witness.
1. Except as provided in this section, no person has a right to call a
witness or appear as a witness in a grand jury proceeding.
2. The people may call as a witness in a grand jury proceeding any
person believed by the district attorney to possess relevant
information or knowledge.
3. The grand jury may cause to be called as a witness any person
believed by it to possess relevant information or knowledge. If the
grand jury desires to hear any such witness who was not called by
the people, it may direct the district attorney to issue and serve a
subpoena upon such witness, and the district attorney must comply
with such direction. At any time after such a direction, however, or
at any time after the service of a subpoena pursuant to such a
direction and before the return date thereof, the people may apply
to the court which impaneled the grand jury for an order vacating
or modifying such direction or subpoena on the ground that such
is in the public interest. Upon such application, the court may in its
discretion vacate the direction or subpoena, attach reasonable
conditions thereto, or make other appropriate qualification thereof."

Hello,
I want to know who banned my husband Robin McElwain. You talk about tolerance, but you were not very tolerant when you banned the biggest Patriot you have ever known. My husband is a disabled Vietnam Vet, and a true Patriot. not like some who have never served this country, or ever fought to save our freedoms. We have a 20 foot by 16 foot flag that goes on our roof every veterans day.
All my husband did was mention Eric Williams and try to find out if you were proceeding properly by stating your "standing" before the courts, and without explanation, he was blocked. If you continue to block people who question you, all you will have is a bunch of mindless sheep. Maybe that's what you want. Maybe some people don't want to be led to the slaughter.
I think you owe Robin McElwain an apology.
He has a group on seen.is called ALL PATRIOTS FOR AMERICA where he directs people to NLA because he still thinks you might have something. Even after you blocked him. How is that for tolerance.
seen.is is a new sight based in Iceland where the government can't do like they are doing on Facebook.
I hope this is the right place to post this so John will see it.

Hi Loveym
I am sorry to hear about your problem with NLA and I to believe open dialogue is paramount in transparent communication. I also am under the impression that Iceland has been successful based on the ability to control the banking cartel. Am I mistaken? Is that what did happen in order to gain control of that government? We are loosing ground in this country and are prime for being the catalyst in total world war. I am seriously considering not sending payment to the banks from which I have credit obligation to. Banks need something else to think about besides finance of the military complex world wide. I do not want interest I pay to finance war. Perhaps this is not the place to post this but again I am sorry about your problems with NLA and thank your husband for his service to me and my family. I think that now is the time for the money changers to pay for using us for their own gain.
May God be with you and yours this holiday season.

I agree with lovem, who banned Robin? Who in the hell is has the right to do this? This is just wrong on so many levels, talk about hypocrisy, a sense of Honor, a sense of Mercy, and a sense of Grace? LOL! I don't know who Robin or Eric Williams are but they are one of the people of we the people. We should all have the right to ask questions and have them properly addressed instead of being banned because YOU don't agree. YOU should be ashamed!

My answers for Individualism vs Collectivism are not being accepted or denied. No pop up is showing up that one or more answers is wrong, it just simply will NOT progress on to the next page when I hit the "Next" Button. Any Ideas???

IS ANYONE WORKING ON FIXING ALL THE GLITCHES???

I'm ready to quit until further notice the Exam has been repaired. :-(

The AG is the State's attorney. They only handle cases that effect the State. They will do nothing on a case from an individual. If the AG does issue an opinion it will only be on the request of someone in the State government. I doubt the AG did anything in your friends case and just sealed what was delivered to them because they lacked jurisdiction to do anything. The foreclosure is going to continue in the court system where it started. Any motions and paper work would need to be filed with the court, not the AG. After all, they are an attorney, not a court.

THE AG's ,SAAG's prosecute cases on behalf of private individuals, that being the mother in civil child support cases, in the State of GEORGIA. They do not provide that same protection to fathers in these cases, and results in most fathers being jailed, although the matter arose out of a civil context, divorce.