Limited Government Is

Obama’s US Assassination Program?

Human Events

Sound too conspiratorial to be true? Like the cover-up ops of spy novels? Well, it’s reality. And it is possibly the most bizarre, inhumane and abusive way that the White House is expanding its power over the American people.

It’s not an extremist belief or theory of the far right. It’s a fact that has been confirmed by The New York Times, The Washington Post and MSNBC and even documented by the far-left online magazine Salon.com.

And it’s the gravest nightmare of U.S. citizens and abandonment of our Constitution to date: a presidential assassination program in which U.S. citizens are in the literal scopes of the executive branch based upon nothing more than allegations of terrorism involvement as the branch defines it.

Of course, the CIA has executed covert assassinations of foreigners for decades. But tragically, Obama is expanding this program to include American, non-Islamic, stateside, homegrown terrorists.

It all started in January, when The Washington Post reported: “As part of the operations, Obama approved a Dec. 24 strike against a (Yemeni) compound where a U.S. citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi, was thought to be meeting with other regional al-Qaeda leaders. Although he was not the focus of the strike and was not killed, he has since been added to a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing or capture.”

“A shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing”?

That’s right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.

While the Obama administration continues its Bush-blaming for the economy, it is mega-morphing Bush policy in covert ops overseas, which was, according to the Post, “to kill U.S. citizens abroad if strong evidence existed that an American was involved in organizing or carrying out terrorist actions against the United States or U.S. interests.”

Well, in recent weeks, the Obama administration has taken this overseas killing op to a new low: stateside assassinations.

A former director of national intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, confessed before Congress: “We take direct actions against terrorists in the intelligence community. If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that.”

If you are wondering who the “we” are to whom Adm. Blair refers, they are Smith, Wesson and the White House.

Now we know what deputy national security adviser John Brennan meant when he admitted in May, “And under President Obama, we have built upon the work of the previous administration and have accelerated efforts in many areas.” (Remember when Bush’s eavesdropping on U.S. citizens seemed harsh?)

Brennan further explained then that the problem of homegrown terrorists ranks as a top priority because of the increasing number of U.S. individuals who have become “captivated by extremist ideology or causes.” He went on to say, “There are … dozens of U.S. persons who are in different parts of the world and … are very concerning to us.”

Do you think “different parts of the world” doesn’t include their country of origin?

Conveniently, the Obama administration also is integrating a pervasive plan to ensure the termination of radicals as the feds deem them abroad and domestic, too, with the resurrection of the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, introduced by Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif. Also known as H.R. 1955, it was passed in the House by the Democratic majority but was rejected by the Senate.

Everyone thought that legislation was dead until the Obama administration resurrected its tenets in its 52-page “National Security Strategy,” released in May. So alarming is the feds’ potential abuse of power that officials from London to the Kremlin are recognizing the threat to U.S. citizens.

The European Union Times reported, “Foreign Ministry reports circulating in the Kremlin today are warning that an already explosive situation in the United States is about to get a whole lot worse as a new law put forth by President Obama is said capable of seeing up to 500,000 American citizens jailed for the crime of opposing their government.”

Woodrow Wilson, during his reign as president, incarcerated more than 2,000 U.S. citizens for speaking out against the government. And now for the first time since, a U.S. president is highlighting the threats of homegrown terror and literally hunting U.S. citizens as terrorists. One senior administration official said, “For the first time since 9/11, the (national security strategy) integrates homeland security and national security.”

And what type of “integration” does that entail?

President Obama explained in an often overlooked statement within the “National Security Strategy”: “We are now moving beyond traditional distinctions between homeland and national security. … This includes a determination to prevent terrorist attacks against the American people by fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home.”

Could it be any clearer? Right out of the horse’s mouth. Or do I need to spell out what “fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home” means?

Remember the words “a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing”?

That’s right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.

Post navigation

12 thoughts on “Obama’s US Assassination Program?”

I have said before Obama’s idolation of Lincoln is troubling with his his history of Marxism, Islam, and terrorists. Lincoln was many things not all good and it would be those things not constitutional and tyranical he would choose to emulate.

He is becoming a Hitler like tyrant. That he may kill non Muslims in our country shows he is more like a terrorist , an Islamic terrorist.

The terrorists that we should be fearful of, and guard against, are those American separatists that want to destroy our federal government and return all power to the STATES!

The southern strategy of those that are resentful that the south had lost the “War Between The States” are organized to bring back the traditions that existed during the “Good Ol’ Days of southern dominance in the good old USA.

The struggle against CIVIL RIGHTS has always been a passion that was centered in the SOUTH, and the battle cry, that “The South Will Rise Again!”
is a refrain that has been heard from the time of the civil war to the present day!

Those on the RIGHT WING of the political spectrum have in their ranks, those that have declared that they are willing to take up arms so as to destroy the Federal Government and insure that the individual States will become the primary force in America.

Abraham Lincoln had declared that this sentiment and activity was TREASON and declared WAR against the South for this subversive action against the United States of AMERICA!

You are one who believes in the myth of Lincoln. He caused the War of Northern agression and the states had the RIGHT to secced. It has been proven by many who have studied it. Those who are talking of an uprising want a return to a government that is constitutionaly restrained as it should be.

I would expect you consider the massacre at Waco acceptable too.

If Obama isn’t a socialist why does he surround himself with them. The administration and the Democrats in congress have a higher concentration of socialists and communists than in the Russian government.

Time marches on!… Abraham Lincoln declared war on the Southern Confederacy because the Southern Confederacy was organized to separate the southern states from the United States of America!

This was definitely TREASON against the nation of the UNITED States of America!

By choosing to separate from our nation would have weakened our nation relative to the existing NATIONS in the world.
Constitutionally the Federal Government has supremacy over the States in many areas.

The recent court ruling regarding LAWS ON IMMIGRATION, has affirmed that it would not be in the best interest of the Nation as a whole to have all of the states have their separate immigration laws.

The concept that the best way to rule is to have individual states determine the laws of the land, is a concept that would weaken us as a nation and divide us so that we will no longer be a “United States of America.”

THE “GOOD OLe Southern Boys are way behind the times! The past is dead and buried and will never return and see the light of day.

Our Nation is no longer a strictly NATIONAL ENTITY. It is increasingly being replaced by the economic system of GLOBALISM.

The “ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT ruled by a Cooperating Capitalist Olagarchy that will design a world planned economy that will make the NATION STATE unnecessary as they conspire with the largest global capitalists to control supply and demand and exploit to the greatest degree all of the Consumers and Workers of the world.

The old concept of NATIONS will not exist as the economies of the world become one big organized “oligarchy” that plans to dominate and control the people of the world and will do so because it can!

Every “cause” creates an “effect” so this control of the people of the world by controlling what sustains them, will cause the dominated and controlled class victims to naturally rebel against these revolting conditions, and put into place the opposite of what exists.

That opposite would be a world wide planned economy planned to satisfy all of the needs of all of the people in the world without discrimination.

The greed of the profit gathering capitalist oligarchy will obviously reap havoc on the world’s resources and render our planet in bad shape.

Perhaps it will be at this point in time when economic classes no longer exists, that humanity will be able to repair all of the environmental damage.

U.S. Government has a history of fabricating evidence to imprison innocent Americans, including persons who questioned government and or wrote articles exposing government corruption.

If the Obama government is permitted to assassinate Americans in their own country, based on government claims someone is involved in organizing or carrying out terrorist actions against the United States or U.S. interests, it should be expected U.S. intelligence agencies and private government contractors will fabricate evidence to justify killing Americans.

While Chuck Norris made good points, Chuck described bullets being used to assassinate U.S. Citizens in America. But generally, intelligence agents in developed nations don’t use bullets to kill Citizens in their own country. Fifty years ago the CIA allegedly would sneak into someone’s hotel room and taint their toothbrush with a chemical that would cause death, hopefully believed a heart attack. Since then U.S. Government as greatly improved on assassinations using biological/chemical agents that are not traceable after a period or combined with binary agents that have a short shelf life, so cause of death can’t be determined. Such death causing agents may be placed anywhere, e.g. on someone’s door knob on their vehicle steering wheel, put inside their shoe or simply dropped in their cocktail at a bar when they leave for the restroom. Eventual death can be caused by extremely low frequency emissions to destroy a person’s immune system. No doubt Obama’s plan to assassinate U.S. Citizens will silence his critics at home.
When a President supports assassinating Americans, it is important to determine how likely it is that Obama might knock off innocent U.S. Citizens without sufficient evidence.
Recently Obama gave a speech in May 2010 that proposed incarcerating in indefinite detention without evidence of wrong doing, any person government deemed a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future. Obama asked for the power to incarcerate U.S. Citizens not on evidence, but for what they might do. Could Obama’s decision to assassinate Americans be based on hearsay? Could a corrupt U.S. Government use it assassination power to kill its political opposition?

When you examine Obama’s May 2010 speech, it appears Obama wants retroactive power to incarcerate without evidence anyone government claims (prior) supported violent acts on the premise that person is likely to support violent acts in the future: U.S. activists would be extremely vulnerable to indefinite detention because no activist can control what another activist or group might do illegally they network with domestically or overseas. U.S. Government would only have to allege a person; group or organization might commit a violent act in the future to order Preventative Detention of lawful participants, with no evidence whatsoever. Overnight millions of lawful U.S. activists, including Tea Party members could be subject to arrest and Indefinite Detention. Obama could use this power to arrest members of Congress, drag U.S. Citizens off the street and from their homes. It is foreseeable any “individual” who writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against or entity of U.S. Government or its coalition partners could be deemed by authorities a “Combatant” or likely to engage in or cause violent acts: government can too easily claim an author’s writings inspired people in the past and will in the future to commit violent acts. It is problematic detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or allowed legal counsel; interrogated, may be prosecuted for ordinary crimes because of their alleged admissions while held in indefinite detention. Obama wants the power to override the U.S. Constitution. Obama wants the power to detain indefinitely any American without probable cause or evidence, based on conjecture someone might do something violent in the future.

Obama supports assassinating Americans anywhere based on government claims, someone is involved in organizing or carrying out terrorist actions against the United States or U.S. interests. A former Director of National Intelligence allegedly confessed before Congress: “We take direct actions against terrorists in the intelligence community. If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that.” Who else in the White House might be involved in approving assassination of Americans; Obama’s Marxist Czars?
See: Obama May 2010 speech /Sound-Video asking for power to incarcerate Americans without evidence:http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/630.html

Obama wants to resurrect the Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007,” introduced by U.S. Rep. Jane Harman. Apparently the Obama administration resurrected its tenets in its new 52-page National Security Strategy, released in May. Rep.
Jane Harman’s preventative terrorist legislation was not written exactly like the Nazi 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that suspended the Reich Constitution, but it could have brought America to the same place trashing Americans’ civil liberties. Harman’s bill had the potential of driving lawful political and other activists underground into American cell groups. Perhaps expectantly creating the domestic terrorists the Bush Administration said we needed to be protected from.

The Harman bill extended to any “planned act” that involved Americans in the U.S. including against foreign governments that were its “U.S. alleys.” Under the Harman bill, environmental and other organizations in America would be at risk if they coordinated activities with or supported foreign activist groups in other countries; because lawful American organizations can’t control what might happen overseas at a “planned” demonstration or know the “planned acts” of foreign activists they network.

Under the broad language of the Harman bill, anyone attending a “planned event” could be charged with trying to coerce a government and its people. Government would only have to allege an individual in a group (thought about coercing a government or its people.) Labor demonstrators that blocked or intimidated shoppers from entering a store could be charged with “coercing people” under Harman’s “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act.”

Under Harman’s bill, should violence breakout at a “planned” event, government could charge that everyone attending was “ideologically based toward violence.” Individual activists who set up web sites promoting “planned activities”, wrote, emailed or handed out “flyers” promoting “a planned” demonstration could be charged with Violent Radicalization or Homegrown Terrorism, depending on the violence that occurred. Information flyers not intended by an author to be distributed at a particular event but were somehow distributed, could under the Harman bill open the door for government to charge the author with promoting “Violent Radicalization and/or Homegrown Terrorism, if that resulted. Such concerns by writers would have crushed written dissent.

Americans would have had no right to refute be labeled “ideologically based toward violence” because of what another person said or did at a “planned event” or meeting which they were involved. Under such circumstances millions of Americans would have become afraid to support or attend political and other public meetings out of concern someone might do something that violated Rep. Harman’s “Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act.”

The historical facts are that when the conditions become extreme and the threat of a capitalist or a socialist uprising that has the intention of being extreme and threatens to overthrow or severely undermine the foundation of a socialist or a capitalist economy, the political powers that be, within these two competing economic entities will act in exactly the same way so as to prevent their political and economic opposition to become victorious and cause socialism and their planed economy being changed to a market economy and to prevent a capitalist market economy from being changed to a socialist planned economy.

It is only natural and is to be expected that under every economic system of government, the amount of political freedom and tolerance that is allowed to it’s citizens is factored in by the degree and intensity of the opposition that exists within the particular social structure.

To automatically subscribe to the idea that the concept of freedom and democracy is only on our side and is impossible to exist on the opposite side of the coin defies logic and reality.

Those that act prematurely and become revolutionary, when the conditions do not warrant revolutionary activity are being foolish and are destined to fail.

Those that portray Obama as a socialist or as a communist are revealing their lack of understanding of what is communism, socialism and capitalism.

Obama is a moderate compromising fool that does not recognize the true nature and character of his unrelenting opposition that is united to make sure that the country and his administration fails in every respect so that the republicans can be in a good position to win the general election!

The name calling and the characterizing of Obama as a Communist and a Fascist and not an American or a Christian are deliberate lies so as to excite the unsophisticated and ignorant members of the republican base to contribute their hard earned money to defeating Obama and returning the republicans to power!

If you sincerely believe that Obama is not an
american and that he is not a christian, and that he is a communist and a fascist and is conspiring to kill americans while they sleep, if you believe all that nonsense you have been had by the propagandists of the republican party!

Lincoln had federal troops occupy the STATE fort of Sumpter. The state retook the fort without killing any federal troops and allowed them to leave. Lincoln then ordered Virginia and other states to muster 75,000 troops to invade S. Carolina igniting the string of secessions. He wanted a war.

Your view of world governance smacks of communism. Without capitalism the strive to better ones self is lost and innovations suffer.

Obama sealed his records as one of his first acts and has spent over a million dollars fighting exposing them a third grader would tell you he is hiding something.

He told a Egyptian official on his trip there he was a Muslim and before and after the election has had slips of the tongue that also show him to be a Muslim.

You are either very young and are a product of indoctrination by liberals in school and have never worked for a living or a schill for Obama and are clueless. You need to stay away from the kool aid either way.