When it comes down to it, this is the ENTIRE reason you vote one way or the other, whether you would have sex with someone. Deep down, that's what it's all about. It's easy for the media to make Trump look unsexy as an older gentlemen, and easier still, to make Obama look sexy because he's charming and younger. It really has nothing to do with politics, this is why Macron won. You don't care about right and wrong when you hate on Trump. You just don't think he's sufficient enough to be a sexual partner, and so you are automatically deposed to think negatively about him. This is what I really despise about people on the left. They think with their dicks. If it was twenty years ago and he was younger you would have jumped for him no matter what he said. It's really sad, but it is the basis for which most of you vote. You want young and sexy and you hate him just because you wouldn't suck his dick. It's all you base your life on, like this website. Yes, no, to the left, to the right. It's unfortunate but it's reality, and it's like me going around telling people how horrible smoking and drinking and eating meat is for you. You just don't care. The only thing that matters is sex, it has nothing to do with actual issues. That's how people work. I don't really think people get the ways that they are manipulated at this point, like putting a big fat black woman judge up there who doesn't even have a clue, but because of your past, you just accept what she says. It's really sad that people can't get past their indifference and their judgements based on physical perceptions.

If it was twenty years ago and he was younger you would have jumped for him no matter what he said. It's really sad, but it is the basis for which most of you vote. You want young and sexy and you hate him just because you wouldn't suck his dick.

Completely false. I find O'Malley attractive, but I find him to be another corporate politician that I will never vote for.

It's really sad that people can't get past their indifference and their judgements based on physical perceptions.

I agree that indifference and judgments (not "judgements") based on physical perceptions are a problem, but this issue is across political parties.

To address your topic question, I would rather have sex with neither. I don't find either physically attractive, and I don't like who they are as people, as dishonesty is a huge turnoff for me. I find Obama less unattractive, but I still wouldn't want to have sex with him or Trump.

When it comes down to it, this is the ENTIRE reason you vote one way or the other, whether you would have sex with someone. Deep down, that's what it's all about. It's easy for the media to make Trump look unsexy as an older gentlemen, and easier still, to make Obama look sexy because he's charming and younger. It really has nothing to do with politics, this is why Macron won. You don't care about right and wrong when you hate on Trump. You just don't think he's sufficient enough to be a sexual partner, and so you are automatically deposed to think negatively about him. This is what I really despise about people on the left. They think with their dicks. If it was twenty years ago and he was younger you would have jumped for him no matter what he said. It's really sad, but it is the basis for which most of you vote. You want young and sexy and you hate him just because you wouldn't suck his dick. It's all you base your life on, like this website. Yes, no, to the left, to the right. It's unfortunate but it's reality, and it's like me going around telling people how horrible smoking and drinking and eating meat is for you. You just don't care. The only thing that matters is sex, it has nothing to do with actual issues. That's how people work. I don't really think people get the ways that they are manipulated at this point, like putting a big fat black woman judge up there who doesn't even have a clue, but because of your past, you just accept what she says. It's really sad that people can't get past their indifference and their judgements based on physical perceptions.

When it comes down to it, this is the ENTIRE reason you vote one way or the other, whether you would have sex with someone. Deep down, that's what it's all about. It's easy for the media to make Trump look unsexy as an older gentlemen, and easier still, to make Obama look sexy because he's charming and younger. It really has nothing to do with politics, this is why Macron won. You don't care about right and wrong when you hate on Trump. You just don't think he's sufficient enough to be a sexual partner, and so you are automatically deposed to think negatively about him. This is what I really despise about people on the left. They think with their dicks. If it was twenty years ago and he was younger you would have jumped for him no matter what he said. It's really sad, but it is the basis for which most of you vote. You want young and sexy and you hate him just because you wouldn't suck his dick. It's all you base your life on, like this website. Yes, no, to the left, to the right. It's unfortunate but it's reality, and it's like me going around telling people how horrible smoking and drinking and eating meat is for you. You just don't care. The only thing that matters is sex, it has nothing to do with actual issues. That's how people work. I don't really think people get the ways that they are manipulated at this point, like putting a big fat black woman judge up there who doesn't even have a clue, but because of your past, you just accept what she says. It's really sad that people can't get past their indifference and their judgements based on physical perceptions.

mhorndisk,

Toward the middle of your thread's opening post, you take a pause from the politics of sex, and indicate that you abstain from smoking, drinking, and eating meat. While these are each personal choices for us all, I applaud you for seeking out better health.

With this said, I don't understand why, with your no-meat lifestyle, your avatar is a hot young man holding a hunting rifle. I mean, I am anti-fur, so I would not have an avatar of some guy in a mink jock strap. I did ask this in another post, but it was quickly overtaken by other comments.

It's for self-defense and protection from liberals, not for hurting animals. Duh.

Thanks for the explanation, and you've got a great thought process there: a gun to shoot people with differing views.

And as for your original topic, this whole "choose which president you would f-ck" thing is really low-brow, and is just the latest of your weird rants blending sexuality into politics and then, angry or unsettling retorts. Honestly, are there any faint cries coming from your locked cellar?

Dude, it's for self defense, not offense. Not just to go around and shoot people. It's called protection, and the right to be secure. What about the 2nd amendment don't you understand?

And yes I am blending a little sex into politics because I know that charm plays a big part in people's desires and what they want to hear and what they want to believe. It happens all the time. It's not something weird.

It's for self-defense and protection from liberals, not for hurting animals. Duh.

Thanks for the explanation, and you've got a great thought process there: a gun to shoot people with differing views.

And as for your original topic, this whole "choose which president you would f-ck" thing is really low-brow, and is just the latest of your weird rants blending sexuality into politics and then, angry or unsettling retorts. Honestly, are there any faint cries coming from your locked cellar?

And yes I am blending a little sex into politics because I know that charm plays a big part in people's desires and what they want to hear and what they want to believe. It happens all the time. It's not something weird.

When you merge sex and politics in your rants -- such as telling us repeatedly, in prior posts, how much we want to fellate some political figure -- it's a very, very special blend of icky-weird.

On the other hand, I wholeheartedly agree that you are this forum's leading authority on charm.