My dear Rafa was only 18 in 2004 and 22 in 2008. Surely you did not expect him to be reaching every final on his worst surfaces then did you ? What finals was Roger reaching at the comparable age ? What finals are 18-22 year olds reaching these days ? Exactly. Stop embarrassing yourself.

Because Wimbledon plays so slow like clay that he can reach those 2 finals. The person who has WTA serve wins Wimbledon today.

So what? Rafa is dominant on clay like nobody else including Federer ever was, on any surface. And still, this turkey-like H2H doesn't really show what this match-up is about. Please don't bring statistics into this argument, because you are just embarrassing yourself: Nadal did reach almost every final in the last two years, but what about 2004-2008? He dominated on clay since 2005 and reached Wimby finals, but unlike Fed who was always a close second even on his worst surface, Nadal was nowhere to be found on HC. There is no reason to claim that Nadal is as solid on fast surfaces as Federer is on clay. They play 3 clay events a year together, and at least 10 off clay, yet 14 of their 28 meetings were on clay.

Fuck off Murray fan.

My dear Rafa was only 18 in 2004 and 22 in 2008. Surely you did not expect him to be reaching every final on his worst surfaces then did you ? What finals was Roger reaching at the comparable age ? What finals are 18-22 year olds reaching these days ? Exactly. Stop embarrassing yourself.