NOTE - THE NOTED DISAPPROVED ITEMS MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE LIST OF VIOLATIONS. THE DESIGNER IS TO CONDUCT A COMPLETE RE-REVIEW OF THE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS OF THE STANDARD COMMENTS AND INCORRECT INFORMATION PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.

System plans must be picked up within 30 days. All system plans left longer than 30 days will be discarded as abandoned.

&nbsp&nbsp &nbsp

Review Date

Status

Comment(s)

6/11/2014

Approved

Plans re-submitted. There are two minor changes in piping in the vault, not due to DV review but due to CSU requirements. Lines within the vault were not easily maintainable so now the lines and joints are angled rather than 90 degree with horizontal run.
Engineer has now separated water plans in to two sets. One for fire line and one Utility Service (originally submitted as one set).
Plans signed and copy retained for CSFD file.

5/19/2014

FYI

*****(STANDARD COMMENT 1) This project is: UCCS Village at Alpine Valley
You can access our web site for the latest fire department plan review comments:
1. From www.pprbd.org, select PLAN REVIEW then FIND PLANS next COLORADO SPRINGS
2. Scroll down to the correct address. You may then select APPROVED/DISAPPROVED to view comments associated with that particular project.

(STANDARD COMMENT) READY FOR SIGNATURES:
The water plans appear ready for signature as long as all disapproved comments have been addressed. Please provide one hard copy for CSFD records along with your final copies for our signature.

FYI

(STANDARD COMMENT 10) INSPECTIONS
Please call 719-385-5982 Extension 2 to schedule all construction related inspection activities. You will need to schedule an inspection at the time of Framing and a final inspection near completion.
Due to the dynamic nature of inspectors schedules, PLEASE call your inspection requests in with ample time to allow scheduling. When calling, please have your complete CSFD plan review number(s) ready for each inspection request. ( i.e. 2013-1234 - HS-1)
The CSFD Approved sets of plans are to be on site for all inspections.

Disapproved

DISAPPROVED
The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review:
1. The site plans need to be approved - then the water plans will be ready for signature provided there are no changes affecting the water plans (access relocations, etc affecting hydrant/FDC locations).
Also:
1) Review all redline comments and address each one.
2) Return ALL red lined plan sets for each re-review.

FYI

(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS:
Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents.
The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2009 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code.
(105.4.4)

4/14/2014

FYI

*****(STANDARD COMMENT 1) This project is: UCCS Village at Alpine Valley
You can access our web site for the latest fire department plan review comments:
1. From www.pprbd.org, select PLAN REVIEW then FIND PLANS next COLORADO SPRINGS
2. Scroll down to the correct address. You may then select APPROVED/DISAPPROVED to view comments associated with that particular project.

Disapproved

DISAPPROVED
The following information and/or corrections are needed prior to completing a full plan review:
1. Buildings are identified using A, B, C, D on the plans but the building data sheets they were identified by name - I don't know which is which. In reviewing the building data sheets, all appears to be in order except for one item on LaPlata - the fire flow is rounded up to the nearest 250 gpm so the required fire flow is 1750
2. Main sizes are not called out for each segment of water main.
3. There is a fire hydrant that appears to be marked for relocation, but I cannot see what the purpose of this particular hydrant is. Is there a building just plan east of this project this hydrant is provided for?
4. North of Building D there is a call out for a proposed fire hydrant that is not marked on the plans. Please clarify.
5. Site plans need to be reviewed by CSFD Code Services prior to our approval of the water plans.
Also:
1) Review all redline comments and address each one.
2) Return ALL red lined plan sets for each re-review.

Disapproved

(DISAPPROVED) FIRE FLOW REPORT
Provide confirmation on the fire flow results from Colorado Springs Utilities. A copy of their report for this area is required to be provided with your plan submittals.
When multiple fire flows are provided from CSU, please indicate all flows on your submitted plans.
NOTE - To request a fire flow report, please go to: https://www.csu.org/Pages/construction-drawing-review.aspx

FYI

(STANDARD COMMENT) REVIEWS:
Colorado Springs Fire Department construction reviews are based upon information provided on the drawings and/or the attached reference material. Issues or features that are not presented within the construction documents are assumed to be complaint with applicable codes/standards. It is the responsibility of the building owner to ensure that minimum code requirement are met as established by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, whether of not the requirements are specifically indicated on the submitted construction documents.
The CSFD has reviewed the submittal in accordance with the fire code requirements of the 2009 International Fire Code, CSFD local amendments, City Code Standards, and applicable NFPA Standards. All plan review comments are subject to final on-site field inspections, and testing by the CSFD. Review and approval by the CSFD shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the International Fire Code.
(105.4.4)