Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November
24th 2009. For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com
and on the front page scroll down, bookmark all the other sites I have up there
because once in a while the major ones go down and if you have them bookmarked
you can always pull the latest shows down. There’s [sites listed
above].

Remember
that YOU bring me to YOU, the listeners. It’s always the same people who
donate all the time and thousands and thousands listen, that’s for sure.
I know that by the amount of traffic that goes through these sites I have up
there. I depend upon the people who listen to once in a while drop a few
shekels in this direction because it keeps me going. You can also buy
that which I have for sale on the web site. [Purchase and donations
options listed above.] You can send straight cash. That’s the best
way because it cuts out the little guy with the triple chins and the podgy
fingers and the very expensive taxpayer-funded suit.

That’s
what we are up against today. We’re going through tremendous changes,
fantastic changes and there is so much news out there and so much POLITICAL
movements, really that have gathered to fight this final battle as they call
it, to do with what’s coming up in December. In December they have this
Copenhagen Treaty and the big boys have put ALL their eggs in one basket.
I don’t care if you end up buried in snow, they’re going to scream ‘global
warming’ until they have this all passed. Once they have it passed, it
will start to sort of die off but then in come all the carbon taxes and
everything that is going to control your ENTIRE way of living, right down – I’m
not kidding – to who can breed. That’s what it’s going to come out of it
as well, and who can NOT breed. They’ve already – and I’ve read them on
the air – put articles out there about each child that is born is a potential
carbon unit who it going to consume more, etc, etc, all this eugenical stuff is
wrapped up in the climate debate… the farce actually, the farce that has been
exposed.

So
it’s up to you to keep me going. Donate; help me out because it takes
cash to keep all this stuff going here. Everything I am using is obsolete
pretty well and I’ll have to upgrade some things very, very shortly.
Remember too, those who get the disks burned and passed to them can get to me
at [address listed above]. Remember too, I also get problems once in a
while uploading because XplorNet, that great, high-speed con man in the sky,
the satellite guy, takes the cash but punishes you if you USE the so-called
service that you are paying through the nose for. So once in a while I’m
late. Actually, it’s every day now I have to upload 2 days for every one
night. Back with more after this break.

HI
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking
about the gathering of the powers and how literally they’ve gone to such an
incredible length throughout, since about the 1990s and onwards, about the
global warming, something they PLANNED to bring in back in the 1970s according
to the guys that dreamed up the idea at the Club of Rome. They printed
that in their own book called The First Global Revolution. They
came up with the idea in the 70s but in the 90s, that’s when the grant money
started to be given to them, FUNNELLED to them, to the big professors at
universities to go along with this. You must get NAMES, well-known names,
professionals in a field to CON the public.

That’s
not a new idea because you find that Edward Bernays that really created, took
the credit for creating the consumer society in America. He came up with
that idea of getting important people, professionals in their field, even
setting up front colleges for them. They’d all come into this
supposed college, sometimes they’d make a real little one, even a store front
would do… the Association of blah, blah, blah and then they would then get
articles published in magazines and newspapers. This little clique of
so-called professionals who are all simply on the payroll and often didn’t even
attend any debates. They simply put their name to it and said go ahead
and write what you want and use my name and they got well, well paid for doing
so.

It’s
interesting to do with this Climate Gate scandal now that so many of their
private emails between the different leaches that are living off these massive
grants has been exposed to the public. It’s interesting to see that a lot
of the mainstream media is, as I said it would happen, is pretending that
nothing happened at all. It’s so close to their deadline now that
they’re counting on everyone turning up. In fact all the students that go
to these particular universities - where the professors get the big grant
moneys, had been advised IN THE EMAILS that were released to the public – they
were advised to GO to this Copenhagen meeting to all put in their two cents
worth and demand that something be done.

Now
this is a POLITICAL movement, not a scientific movement and that’s the key to
it all. There’s a political and an economic agenda here as well.
Because everything from then on, once that thing is signed, is going to be
ENTIRELY different, completely and entirely different new way of living.
It’s interesting too – I’ve got the link for this as well – to do with the
grants that some of these professors mentioned in the emails got.
Professor Jones, for instance, that seems to be one of the ring leaders, and no
wonder they all obeyed him because his personal grants from 1990 onwards was
13.7 million pounds, about 27 million dollars. So you can see HE has
definitely got a motive for pushing this rubbish because otherwise where would
he be without all this created crisis? All the professors would be in the
back of some university with hardly any students attending at all. Now
its big business, you see, big, big business.

It’s
going to be run like the Communist Party. Believe you me, it has so much
in common with how communists worked their big campaigns that it’s NO
coincidence. It’s no coincidence that Professor Carroll Quigley said that
the Royal Institute of International Affairs/CFR were often mistaken for
communists because their policies seems to go in the same direction.
Well, they went in the same direction because the big bankers that started off
the Royal Institute of International Affairs - from the Milner Group - were all
bankers at the top, in the beginning. They were all international bankers
who FUNDED communism into existence. Same names, same names… and that’s
history, not conjecture.

Here’s
an article from – it’s interesting – Pajamas Media. It’s quite
interesting. Everyone knows the name of Lord Monckton who did the video –
I’ll put the link up again – discussing in the US what was coming down the pike
if this Copenhagen Treaty goes through. Pretty well it will go through
because the big boys that presently run the world’s finances have staked
everything on this passing, everything. It’s to be a whole new economy
based on energy usage and carbon. A WHOLE NEW ECONOMY and it’s to go
through the Rothschild’s bank in Switzerland too. Isn’t that
amazing? I read the articles from the mainstream FROM Rothschild himself,
advising them to put it through this particular bank, all these carbon
credits. What a clique at the top! What a clique, CREATING A BELIEF
SYSTEM FOR A NEW AGE. That’s what it’s all about. Pajamas Media
says this…

Viscount Monckton on Climategate: ‘They Are Criminals’

The
man who challenged Al Gore to a debate (Alan: and was refused by Gore, of
course.) is furious about the content of the leaked CRU emails — and says
why you should be, too.

pajamasmedia.com / Posted By Christopher Monckton On
November 23, 2009

This is what they
did — these climate “scientists” on whose unsupported word the world’s classe
politique proposes to set up an unelected global government this December
in Copenhagen, with vast and unprecedented powers to control all formerly free
markets, to tax wealthy nations and all of their financial transactions, to
regulate the economic and environmental affairs of all nations, and to
confiscate and extinguish all patent and intellectual property rights.

The tiny, close-knit
clique of climate scientists who invented and now drive the “global warming”
fraud — for fraud is what we now know it to be [1] — tampered with temperature
data so assiduously that, on the recent admission of one of them, land temperatures
since 1980 have risen twice as fast as ocean temperatures. One of the thousands
of emails recently circulated by a whistleblower at the University of East
Anglia, where one of the world’s four global-temperature datasets is compiled,
reveals that data were altered so as to prevent a recent decline in temperature
from showing in the record. (A: They actually did that. Anything
that went against this new ideology was simply obliterated and so were
thousands and thousands of scientists who said it was all bogus science.)
In fact, there has been no statistically significant “global warming” for
15 years — and there has been rapid and significant cooling for nine years.

Worse, these
arrogant fraudsters — for fraudsters are what we now know them to be — have
refused, for years and years and years, to reveal their data and their computer
program listings. Now we know why: As a revealing 15,000-line document from the
computer division at the Climate Research Unit shows, the programs and data are
a hopeless, tangled mess. In effect, the global temperature trends have
simply been made up. Unfortunately, the British researchers have been
acting closely in league with their U.S. counterparts (A: In THEIR
universities.) who compile the other terrestrial temperature dataset — the
GISS/NCDC dataset. That dataset too contains numerous biases intended
artificially to inflate the natural warming of the 20th century.

Finally, these
huckstering snake-oil salesmen and “global warming” profiteers — for that is what
they are — have written to each other encouraging the destruction of data that
had been lawfully requested under the Freedom of Information Act in the UK by
scientists who wanted to check whether their global temperature record had been
properly compiled. (A: So these are other scientists, right.) And
that procurement of data destruction, as they are about to find out to their
cost, is a criminal offense. (A: They destroyed the data.) They
are not merely bad scientists — they are crooks. And crooks who have
perpetrated their crimes at the expense of British and U.S. taxpayers.

I am angry, and so
should you be. (A: Then he goes on to a second page. He
says it all. He says what we all know, those who have been following
this.)

What have the mainstream
news media said about the Climategate affair? Remarkably little [2]. The few
who have brought themselves to comment, through gritted teeth (A:
Because all the media have been pushing this rubbish of global warming.),
have said that all of this is a storm in a teacup, and that their friends in
the University of East Anglia and elsewhere in the climatological community are
good people, really.

No, they’re not.
They’re criminals. With Professor Fred Singer, who founded the U.S. Satellite
Weather Service, I have reported them to the UK’s Information Commissioner,
with a request that he investigate their offenses and, if thought fit,
prosecute. But I won’t be holding my breath: In the police state that
Britain has now sadly become, with supine news media largely owned and
controlled by the government, the establishment tends to look after its own.

At our expense, and
at the expense of the truth.

So
well said. Well said indeed. Then we have another one here and this
is from The Telegraph.

Lord Lawson (A: Here’s another
British Lord.) calls for public inquiry
into UEA (A: That’s the University of East Anglia that was
one of the centers for all of this data collection and con men. That’s
where they gathered and kept all their data.)

global warming data 'manipulation'

Lord
Lawson, the former chancellor (A: That’s like in charge of the
treasury basically.), has called for an independent inquiry into claims
that leading climate change scientists manipulated data to strengthen the case
for man-made global warming.

By Matthew Moore / 23 Nov 2009

Thousands of emails
and documents stolen from the University of East Anglia (UEA) and posted online
indicate that researchers massaged figures (A: ‘Massaged’ is putting
it lightly but that’s the politeness of some of the British.) to mask the
fact that world temperatures have been declining in recent years.

This morning Lord
Lawson, who has reinvented himself (A: They’re not happy with this
guy.) as a prominent climate change sceptic since leaving front line
politics, demanded that the apparent deception be fully investigated.

He claimed
that the credibility of the university's world-renowned Climatic Research Unit
- and British science - were under threat.

"They should
set up a public inquiry under someone who is totally respected and get to the
truth," he told the BBC Radio Four Today programme.

"If there's an
explanation for what's going on they can make that explanation."

I’ll
read some more of this after this break when I come back, so hold on.

I
am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading from an article
from The Telegraph that Lord Lawson has put in for an inquiry into this con
game of global warming and all the fudged figures that the scientists present
to the public and to the IPCC at the United Nations to get this whole agenda
through, and make themselves even MORE important, these NEW HIGH PRIESTS.
Everyone will go running to them, ‘what will we do now, what do you predict,
what do you…’ Just like they used to do in the Middle Ages.
Every Royal court had their professional astrologer and the Kings and Queens
wouldn’t make a move until these characters came forward to ‘read the
charts.’ It’s the same con game that’s going on… very, very lucrative,
incredibly lucrative. But to continue this article…

Some of the
correspondence indicates that the manipulation of data was widespread
among global warming researchers.

One of the emails
under scrutiny, written by Phil Jones (A: That’s the guy that raked in
13.7 million pounds or 27 million dollars since the 90s.), the centre's
director, in 1999, reads: "I've just completed Mike's Nature [the science
journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years
(ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the
decline." (A: To HIDE the decline, that means to HIDE the falling
temperatures, not the rising temperatures. This is the guy who’s one of
the ring leaders in all of this; incredibly well funded from all the right
people and foundations that will be in charge of your lives from now on once
this Copenhagen Treaty goes through.)

Prof Jones has
insisted that he used the word "trick" to mean a "clever thing
to do" (A: I’d say it’s clever.), rather than to indicate
deception. He has denied manipulating data. (A: Even though it
says to hide the decline.)

Another scientist
whose name appears in the documents accused the hackers of attempting to
undermine the drive for a global consensus at next month's Copenhagen
summit. (A: That’s again… what’s in all these emails telling
thousands of students to attend it and to all the people who are involved, to
vote yes, to pass it. That’s political. This is a political
movement, not a scientific movement.)

Kevin Trenberth of
the US National Center for Atmospheric Research accused climate change sceptics
of cherry-picking the documents and taking them out of context. (A:
Of course they would.)

Meanwhile, hopes
that a legally binding treaty on cutting emissions will be agreed at Copenhagen
have been boosted by the news that more than 60 world leaders plan to
attend. (A: They were going to attend regardless because as I
say, their bosses – if you think these are YOUR world leaders, think
again. They have bosses. They got the same bosses as these
scientists have got. And we don’t elect these bosses.)

Last week Lord
Lawson, who served as chancellor for six years under Margaret Thatcher, told
The Daily Telegraph that he planned to establish a think tank to challenge the
consensus that drastic action is needed to combat global warming.

I’ll
tell you, it will take more than a think tank to stop this. The big boys
have put all their eggs in one basket. A whole new economy. A whole
new way of life. Literally, going along, eventually, to the right to
DECIDE who is going to have children and will NOT have children and how many
children are enough for a whole nation.

What’s
I’m saying here is not conjecture. When the League of Nations - the precursor
of the United Nations - was started up they had the same department for
population control and they were far more blatant about the need for EUGENICAL
control in ALL the nations of the world, by themselves of course. Because
after all, they’re the professionals; they’re brighter than we are.
You see, that’s the standard pabulum of tyranny and tyrants. In the old
days, I preferred the old type Roman tyrant who stood there and strutted
around, kind of like Mussolini, and you knew what he was. These
characters hide behind SCIENCE, bogus science, etc to get what they want.
They still strut around though. Now they’ve got a big stage for the
world, now that they are the high, white-coated priests of the greening and
eugenics agenda.

There’s
also a good spoof article here written almost like a zoologist would go in and
study animals. It’s from Iowahawk Geographic.

Iowahawk Geographic: The Secret Life of Climate
Researchers

by Iowahawk / (breitbart.com) - Nov. 24, 2009

(A: He
talks as though you’re going in there to find these characters where they live,
in their environments, etc, and how they get their grants. They live off
of something called grant money, big, big grant money. I’ll put his link
up and you’ll get quite a chuckle when you go through it for yourself.)

It’s
quite fascinating. The Washington Times at least put something in about
this too, this FARCE of these liars at the top that are conning a whole world
into a political agenda, an OLD political agenda by the way.

Hiding evidence of global cooling

Junk
science exposed among climate-change believers

By THE WASHINGTON TIMES / Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Scientific progress
depends on accurate and complete data. It also relies on replication. The past
couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations about the baloney
practices that pass as sound science about climate change.

It was announced
Thursday afternoon that computer hackers had obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails
from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in
England. (A: I’ll read some more of this when I come back from
this break. It’s quite fascinating.)

Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading one
of the many articles about this revelation about global scamming, the warming
nonsense that’s been perpetrated by all these con men, these big scientists
that are well funded by foundations and bankers to bring in a new world society
according to their data. That’s what it’s all about, this Copenhagen
Treaty. All the politicians at the top are on board with this agenda;
that’s why they were PICKED at this particular time in history, every single
one of them. To continue with this article from The Washington Times…

It was announced
Thursday afternoon that computer hackers had obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails
from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in
England. Those e-mails involved communication among many scientific
researchers and policy advocates with similar ideological positions
all across the world. (A: That’s well worded, ideological
positions, not factual.) Those purported authorities were
brazenly discussing the destruction and hiding of data that did not
support global-warming claims.

Professor Phil Jones
(A: This is the guy with 13.7 million pounds in grants.), the head
of the Climate Research Unit, and professor Michael E. Mann at Pennsylvania
State University, who has been an important scientist in the climate debate,
have come under particular scrutiny. Among his e-mails, Mr. Jones talked to Mr.
Mann about the "trick of adding in the real temps to each series ... to
hide the decline [in temperature]."

Mr. Mann admitted
that he was party to this conversation and lamely explained to the New York
Times that "scientists often used the word 'trick' to refer to a good way
to solve a problem' 'and not something secret.' (A: It certainly
was a good way to solve their problem, since they’re all getting paid to bring
up the warming idea.) “Though the liberal New York newspaper apparently
buys this explanation, we have seen no benign explanation that justifies
efforts by researchers to skew data on so-called global-warming "to hide
the decline." Given the controversies over the accuracy of Mr. Mann's past
research, it is surprising his current explanations are accepted so
readily. (A: Because they’ve all got quite a history, these
characters. You know, they’re not top rated after all, but they’re
certainly open to the top buyer. That’s for sure.)

As
I’ve said before, if you’re up to your eyes in snow, it won’t make any
difference because they will keep going with this global warming mantra until
they’ve got everything signed into what they call a BINDING agreement that are
to rule us for the next 1000 years.

This
article is from the BBC. Apparently the BBC – from what I’ve been told –
they HAD this info given to them by the hacker for A MONTH and didn’t do
anything with it, which isn’t surprising because the BBC is owned by the
British government. It’s an ARM of British governmental policy.
It’s a propaganda arm, in other words.

Global warming science alarming, say climate experts

News.bbc.co.uk / Tuesday, 24 November 2009

(A: So here
they go again a few days after all the con men were discovered and exposed for
what they are. It’s as though it never happened. Remember too, what
they said, the IPCC, that they’d tell all their members and all their pals,
their fellow travelers as you call them, those in sympathy with them, to go
along and hype everything up when it comes to major agreements being
signed. So this is what they are doing.)

Three UK groups
studying climate change have issued a strong statement about the dangers of
failing to cut emissions of greenhouse gases… (A: And the whole rest
of it is ya-da, ya-da, ya-da, ya-da, ya… rubbish.) across the world.

The
Royal Society, this Freemasonic organization of scientists – that’s how it was
founded, as a Freemasonic, Scientific organization. Very elite.
Well nothing has changed, by the way. Any famous scientist in history
that was pushed to the top all came through The Royal Society. They’re
the ones who are pushing this baloney because it’s part of the big, big
agenda. You should go into the history of the Royal Society because
literally, Francis Bacon talks about it, and other ones. If they were
married, they had to put their wife out of their lives and actually give a lump
sum to their family and LEAVE them. You had to live like a monk and be
one of them to get in. It wasn’t until the 20th century that they
allowed their first female in. Even then it was under protest. It’s
literally a Masonic type organization with a charter to exist from the Crown of
course, this British Crown. As I say, if you want to read some rubbish,
you can read the kind of fear that they’re turning out right now in preparation
of the Copenhagen agreement coming up very, very shortly in December.

Believe
you me, they have a lot more parroting articles out there at the same time
saying ‘We’ve got to go along to save the world and to save life’ and blah,
blah, blah. Hype it up. Hype it up. Once it’s done and it’s
all signed, just like 9/11, it sort of fades away. Once they had attacked
Afghanistan and Iraq, it kind of calmed down again. What they wanted was
to get IN there and grab the oil and control the entire Middle East. Same
thing with this once it’s pushed through; we’ll gradually see the policies
introduced – maybe not so gradually in fact – and used. If you think
you’re poor now, if you think you’re getting poor now and your standard of
living is dropping and everything is becoming very expensive, YOU AIN’T SEEN
NOTHING YET. YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET.

I
can remember Malachi Martin talking about the new world order in the 1990s and
this guy wasn’t liked by anybody. He came out against what the Catholic
Church had done and he had been a priest. He came out against everybody
basically that was going along with this new system. He recognized what
it was and knew what it was. He said in one of his talks regarding the
Americans and the Canadians, ‘Get ready for the new world order because you’ve
seen the best of your young American lives.’ Meaning it’s over. He
knew the whole agenda.

We’re
on a roll. On a roll into… if you think it’s crazy now and that things
make no sense to you, as to what you’re hearing, you’ll literally be living in
banana-land once all these laws are passed. Under the guise – this
is how it works – under the guise of emitting carbon, what they really mean is
ENERGY CONSUMPTION, right down to how many Joules of energy it takes to create
say that teething comforter that the baby has. You’ll have to pay extra,
on top of everything else and all the other taxes for that item, for it being
MADE. They’ve got this strange, again, this fantastic trick of converting
every energy unit consumed into carbon. An absolute TRICK of the
imagination and by God, you need a lot of imagination to believe in this
conology. DOUBLE-SPEAK IS HERE. DOUBLE-THINK IS HERE. You’ll
be into quadruple-think; you’ll have FOUR opposing opinions in your head about
the same topic at the same time… and you’ll think they’re all correct.
That’s what it will come down to.

It’s
the same too with this vaccine stuff. For the last month or so, the
marketers – and they do have marketers working FOR the governments of the world
– marketing companies are putting out their usual hype. It’s like sales;
they’ll say ‘buy now before we’re out of stock.’ It’s the same thing
now. ‘Rush and get your flu shot because they’re going to be hard to
get.’ It’s the same TRICK they’ve used in selling things that they’re
using to get folks stampeding off to roll up their sleeves and get jabbed with
this poison. This is from msn.ca. It says here…

Batch of H1N1 vaccine pulled

By The Canadian Press, cbc.ca, November 19, 2009

(A: They’re
really covering their behinds here.)

Health officials
across Canada are being asked to hold back a batch of swine flu vaccine that appears
to be causing higher rates of severe allergic reactions.

The vaccine's
manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, is asking governments to stop using vaccine
doses from one particular lot shipment issued in late October. (A:
It’s more than one lot, you can believe that.)

The company says
it's a cautionary move, pending an investigation. (A: In
other words, don’t worry about it.)

Manitoba health
officials say they have noticed severe allergic reactions from the batch in
question at a rate of one in 20,000. (A: Again, that will be
underestimating it vastly.)

That's much higher
than the normal rate of one in 100,000. (A: It’s a pity if
you’re the one in the 100,000 that has got the wrong genes that don’t FIT IN to
their mass inoculation program eh? Just tough luck! …when you’re
crippled, it’s tough luck.)

The Alberta
government is also holding back the same batch of vaccine, although it says it
has not seen a jump in allergic reactions.

Manitoba's chief
medical officer of health, Dr. Joel Kettner, says he wants to assure people
that the risk of any adverse effects from the vaccine is very low. (A:
What they’re getting is anaphylactic shock. You know that’s when you drop
on the floor after getting it and you go into cardiac arrest and they have to
use defibrillators to bring you back into the land of (if they call this) the
living. That’s where you end up back in, hopefully. So this is what
they are calling ‘severe allergic reactions.’)

Isn’t
it amazing how these scientists and these characters will downplay everything
or boost up the BS. They’ll boost up BS and downplay the nasty
reactions. Same thing as these global warming scammers. Remember
what Bertrand Russell said, ‘If there is to be a tyranny running the world’ – a
tyranny, not a democracy and that’s what they all agreed on at the top; that
it’s POST democratic; that’s what GOVERNANCE means - Russell said, ‘then I’d
rather be in a SCIENTIFIC tyranny.’ He said it would be awful – AWFUL –
but that’s the one that he would approve of if there had to be one.
That’s what we’re under ALREADY, where statistics will be thrown at you and
fact or common sense are out the window. THE STATISTIC MATTER, it doesn’t
matter if they’re bogus or not. And your whole way of life will have to
be twisted aroundto fit
into the statistics.

Con
after con after con. It’s quite something, but we’re definitely on the
roll to the big global new world order, the REAL one, the one that people have
been talking about for years and years and years. Not the mini ones along
the way but the really big one at the top. Remember, this is quite true
what Lord Monckton said, out of this Copenhagen Treaty is TO COME, literally,
the whole structure for world government. Everything will go through this
amazing COMMUNISTIC body called the United Nations. There’s no doubt about
it, they are totally communistic in their approach to everything, the world,
nations, peoples… completely communistic.

They
have no real value on life. You should see these big camps they’ve had
across the world supposedly for people who are coming out of war-torn areas or
catastrophe areas. They’re all KEPT in these particular areas. You
can’t move out of these particular areas year after year after year after year
and the UN is supposedly feeding them these terrible rations. The death rate
is incredible year after year after year. We’re living through eugenics
AT WORK. That’s what we’re living through. There’s an awful lot
more still to come. EUGENICS AT WORK, that’s what the name of the game
is.

The
League of Nations and the United Nations weren’t started up by ordinary
people. They were started up by an ALREADY EXISTING, INCREDIBLY WEALTHY,
ELITE. They guys who basically took the credit for founding it, the whole
idea for the League of Nations that BECAME the United Nations, was the Milner
Group that became the Royal Institute of International Affairs. They were
the ones who brought it forward. President Wilson of the US was just the
front man for Colonel Mandell House. Mandell House got his instructions
from the Royal Institute of International Affairs member Lord Grey. That
was the go-between. Everything that Mandell House told Wilson, Wilson
did. The little front puppet is all he was.

The
richest guys on the planet dreamt up this whole idea of world government and
the KIND of world government. Not the sort of naturally evolving
one that might have happened if it was left to its own devices but an ORDERED,
DICTATORIAL WORLD GOVERNMENT where you’ll simply do as you’re told from the day
you are born. They will decide at a very early age what you’re going to
do, what you’re going to work at to SERVE the world system. Your purpose will
be TO SERVE the world system. That will be your only reason for
living in fact. Where did they get all this idea from? It’s
the same as international communism. It’s EXACTLY the same. That’s
why Carroll Quigley said, they are often mistaken for communists because they
have the SAME AGENDA. Well if they’ve got the same agenda, doesn’t it
mean that it IS the same agenda? That’s what it is. It’s the same
agenda.

They
funded communism into existence. Look at the guys who funded the
Bolshevik Revolution. The big world bankers in New York, Baruch and all
these guys, they funded communism. Why would they fund communism?
The top capitalists funding communism, people just can’t figure that one
out. The top capitalists have always had a problem ensuring they
get PAID from countries that lose in wars. One of the first things they
wanted at the League of Nations and then at the United Nations was a court of
international settlement to guarantee that any loans that they put out to GET
the wars going would be paid back IN FULL by the winners AND the losers.
Then they, through that International Monetary Fund, would be IN CHARGE of
countries’ treasuries during times when those countries failed or had a hard
time paying them back for all their loans. That’s what the IMF is
for.

The
US doesn’t even know it yet. They’ve had the IMF in already
running a lot of their policies for the last few years. Britain had it
when Margaret Thatcher was in. They run your policies, your political
policies, your taxation rates. They come up with new types of taxes and
decide where the taxes are going… and it’s not back into the people; it’s out
of the country. That’s what it’s about. What a fantastic front for
a change.

They
tried the old trick of ideology, serve the communist system. That didn’t
work too well with most people especially when the news of what communism was
really like came out. So they came up with ‘the people might believe
SCIENCE.’ SCIENCE IS THE NEW GOD, you see. It deals with facts and
figures and we can teach people that scientists are infallible and when they
come forward with these theories, they’ll believe the scientist and that is what
they’ve done. Thousands and thousands of paid-off, fat, gloating,
political scientists. That’s what it’s all about. Back with more
after this break.

HI
folks. I am Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. We’ve
got Sam from Sydney, Australia on the line. Are you there Sam?

Sam:
Mate, it’s just amazing what’s
happening with these emails. What I’m most gob-smacked about is how the
mainstream media has actually been handling it. The Sydney Morning Herald
has taken point, the Sydney Morning Herald today… You’d think that this would
be a bombshell. They’ve been fudging the scientific results.
England, that’s actually had a look at the emails, knows that it’s not just one
word, it’s not just the use of the word ‘trick.’ These guys have been
going out as a PACK, as a GANG, silencing other critics, shutting down
debate. Things have been held in their advantage so that they can go out
and use the word ‘peer reviewed’ but it’s reviewed by themselves.

Alan:
Exactly. It’s a GANG, as you
say. It’s a gang and they use the old tactics as you say, of shutting
down debates. They’ve tried to say that the debate is closed, there is no
more dissention and thousands of scientists are locked out of this
argument. It’s a totalitarian regime.

Sam:
Just as a citizen, for all these
years we have been basically told to shut up, the debate is over and now we
realize why.

Alan:
We realize why. The public,
unfortunately, the public have no idea, at the outcome, if they get their way
at Copenhagen, they really have no idea of the hell that’s going to come down.

Sam:
That’s right. The Sydney
Morning Herald today, rather than even having an article about this put out
THEIR article, “PLANET APPROACHING POINT OF NO RETURN, EXPERTS WARN.’ And
who do they cite? The IPCC! It’s
just crazy.

Alan:
The guys, the GANG, that’s just
been exposed.

Sam:
That’s right. They’ve just
been exposed. This is dodgy. Everything should be put on
hold. They should just go, ‘hang on, maybe we’ve got our data wrong;
maybe all these calls to actually have a look at the data, maybe the debate
isn’t over or maybe we should actually have debate before we actually change
the entire fabric of the planet.’ NO. They’re just going to go
ahead. For some reason, I think it’s a done deal.

Alan:
Oh, it’s a done deal. I’m
telling you, literally it would take… I don’t care if God himself came down and
said it’s all bogus, these guys are still going to go ahead with it because
they’ve staked everything on it, A WHOLE NEW ECONOMY, A WHOLE NEW WAY OF
LIVING. They’ve already been trading carbon credits at the top for the
last 4 or 5 years.

Sam:
What gets me is just, you know,
when you speak to people about this. They say ‘even if it is wrong,
obviously, don’t you support a better planet? Don’t you support a cleaner
environment? Don’t you support the third world?’ It just boggles
the mind. It’s kind of like ‘Don’t you support the troops?’ Don’t
you think that maybe we should actually stop meddling in the third world?
Maybe the reason they are in is because we meddled so much. Why don’t we
just try leaving them alone? Why don’t we just try not supporting,
supplying arms to them? Why don’t we just try actually paying them the
fair amount of money to grow their crops or whatever? Why don’t we just
stop exploiting them? Why do we always have to control, have a say and
control what they do?

Alan:
The real reason is that the United
Nations, they WANT to have control over the entire world including these
countries and they want those countries to be totally dependent in all that
they import, chemicals for their agri-business and so on. In fact they
want the agri-businesses that exist in the West to take over the ones in the
third world countries. That’s why. Thanks for calling.

From
Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your
Gods GO with you.