I use the default. Occasionally, I find that setting things to 5280x2880 helps coerce certain websites into displaying higher resolution graphics.
Now, if only I could get Java on Windows to respect my choices.

I use the default. Occasionally, I find that setting things to 5280x2880 helps coerce certain websites into displaying higher resolution graphics.
Now, if only I could get Java on Windows to respect my choices.

The default seems to be OK for me, but I worry about others in my family who might find this kind of small. I guess they can log into their profile and use whatever setting they prefer...

Click to expand...

I can understand that worry. Although if they can make due with the non-retina 27", the retina one on default should actually be easier to read thanks to the increased sharpness. But yeah, the nice thing is the ability to make on-screen elements bigger without losing too much sharpness (I think the sharpness still beats the 2013 iMac which helps with text and things like that).

The default. Anything else (except 5120x2880, which I find far too small) and you're just defeating the point of buying a 5K iMac in the first place (sharpest image quality).

Click to expand...

I wouldn't say defeats it, with it being retina, even the smaller resolutions are clearer and easier on the eyes then some of the older iMacs where its a bit grainy and less than pleasing. Though I see what you are getting at.

MacRumors attracts a broad audience
of both consumers and professionals interested in
the latest technologies and products. We also boast an active community focused on
purchasing decisions and technical aspects of the iPhone, iPod, iPad, and Mac platforms.