"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

<quoted text>Any kid of this old fossil must be a tranny reject like it's father.Could you imagine being a kid of this freak DumbDave?At a minimum, his kid must be one of the biggest bullshitter fake people in the lowlife Demo-Kraut hood.A know-it-all that doesn't know how to add oil to his lawn mower.

<quoted text>when you have nothing to say, you should learn to STFU and not show yourself to be the senile old fool that you are...under Bush, homeowners, as well as stockholders, lost absolutely nothing unless they chose to sell.....except for the fools who never should have been homeowners to begin with.....under Carter, runaway inflation destroyed the savings of many Americans....under Obama, the middle class is getting screwed by ObamaKKKare and will punish the DemoKKKRats in November 2015

You're insane. The inflation allowed retired people to make 14% on CD's!! My grandmother made a killing during the inflation of 1979-81. It's not like retirees spend all their assets at once,you nitwit!

Inflation allows people to pay off debts with inflated dolllars, making long term purchases like cars and homes cheaper. It only hurts new purchasers.

Inflation is good for those with money and those paying off old debt. Bad for those looking to incur new debt.

You're really dumb.

To say it destroyed the saving of anyone proves how stupid you are, Nobraina. The period was littered with COLA's, retirees were easily able to keep up with inflation while it lasted.

<quoted text>Not to belittle Bill Clinton's philandering but Monica did admit to being the aggressor in the relationship. She admitted to trying to seduce him every chance she could get....even after he ended it. As New Yawk said, Bill Clinton was a man in power who "chose" to allow himself to be seduced. As the saying goes, It Takes Two To Tangle.

Clinton's a snatch hound. All she had to do was lock eyes for four seconds. It was logistics from that point forward. Don't you think it ceases to be a seduction if he allowed it to happen? Yes, it takes two to tango.

<quoted text>That is what those 30 bills you keep referencing represent partisan insanity. The Senate has far more important issues with which to concern themselves.You would have to be an idiot to believe that the Senate is going to bother to vote on the Republican "Protect Life Act"(H.R. 358) or "Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Act" (H.R. 2) or "Respect for Marriage Act" (H.R. 1116). Use some common sense.Here are some statistics which may help you realize how insignificant those 30 bills are and help you put things into perspective and grasp why not all bills are presented for discussion.Bills status according to congressional terms:106th (1999-2000) 7460 introduced; 922 made it to committee; 28 failed; 558 enacted.107th (2001-2002) 7750 introduced; 841 made it to committee; 5 failed; 350 enacted.108th (2003-2004) 7045 introduced; 932 made it to committee; 13 failed; 476 enacted.109th (2005-2006) 9141 introduced; 930 made it to committee; 22 failed; 465 enacted.110th (2007-2008) 9218 introduced; 1382 made it to committee; 39 failed;442 enacted.111th (2009-2010) 9239 introduced; 998 made it to committee; 26 failed; 366 enacted.112th (2011-2012) totals not posted yet but only 219 bills became law.This month alone, there have been 136 bills introduced in the 113th congress dealing with climate change alone. The list includes 84 bills that are intended to advance climate action, as well as 52 bills that would hinder climate action.https://www.govtrack.us/blog/2011/08/04/kill-...

"uselesssinceforever0000 "Please explain how money is wasted when the house votes to pass or deny a bill. That was the question. The bills just require the legislators do what they were elected to do. There is no added costs. The legislators get paid, their staff gets paid, costs to maintain the buildings continues. Well maybe the costs for paper goes up.Actually I do not understand why you are concerned, the boy president is going to say screw the constitution, I will get my way with my pen and my phone. He will get slapped by The Supreme Court when they declare he has acted outside the constitution. When that happens you will be on board to have an amendment that restricts the courts making judgements that go against the president.PeaceKMA

<quoted text>You're wrong.Gunner was Middletown, CT.Waxman is Windsor, CTIf you think the two personalities share anything, you're blind.Waxman is the foulmouthed sock runner, with dozens of phony names/locations. He frequently lets his socks engage in foul language. Never any attempt at logic. All insults and ignorance.Gunner is simply a self righteous nitwit, appearing as a Teabaggerr, while exposing his prejudices and lack of education. Esp. funny are his links to pjmedia, etc. Gunner does not have numerous socks, IMO.Sorry to disagree, but I think hyou have it wrong.

<quoted text>I believe what Galt is trying to say is women can't think for themselves and only men are capable of doing so for them. So by definition, they can't possibly be responsible for their actions.Age doesn't mitigate the situation either.

You make a very good point. Republican men do seem to believe that wives should be subservient to their husbands.

Rep. Steve Pearce (R-NM) pretty much summed it up when he stated in his recent memoir that it is the wifes role to voluntarily submit, just as the husband is to lovingly lead and sacrifice."

<quoted text>You're insane. The inflation allowed retired people to make 14% on CD's!! My grandmother made a killing during the inflation of 1979-81. It's not like retirees spend all their assets at once,you nitwit!Inflation allows people to pay off debts with inflated dolllars, making long term purchases like cars and homes cheaper. It only hurts new purchasers.Inflation is good for those with money and those paying off old debt. Bad for those looking to incur new debt.You're really dumb.To say it destroyed the saving of anyone proves how stupid you are, Nobraina. The period was littered with COLA's, retirees were easily able to keep up with inflation while it lasted.

A (personal) single scenario is this liberals interpretation of reality...

<quoted text>You're insane. The inflation allowed retired people to make 14% on CD's!! My grandmother made a killing during the inflation of 1979-81. It's not like retirees spend all their assets at once,you nitwit!Inflation allows people to pay off debts with inflated dolllars, making long term purchases like cars and homes cheaper. It only hurts new purchasers.Inflation is good for those with money and those paying off old debt. Bad for those looking to incur new debt.You're really dumb.To say it destroyed the saving of anyone proves how stupid you are, Nobraina. The period was littered with COLA's, retirees were easily able to keep up with inflation while it lasted.

Galts predictions seem to never come true, he seems still in PA?The troll's 17 sock puppets are amusing... Canadian humor Carol may be still looking for a house or just got tired of Sra Galt's comments?

<quoted text>You're insane. The inflation allowed retired people to make 14% on CD's!! My grandmother made a killing during the inflation of 1979-81. It's not like retirees spend all their assets at once,you nitwit!Inflation allows people to pay off debts with inflated dolllars, making long term purchases like cars and homes cheaper. It only hurts new purchasers.Inflation is good for those with money and those paying off old debt. Bad for those looking to incur new debt.You're really dumb.To say it destroyed the saving of anyone proves how stupid you are, Nobraina. The period was littered with COLA's, retirees were easily able to keep up with inflation while it lasted.

<quoted text>that's where Galt differs with you...Galt wants a candidate who will uphold Constitutional principles, not a Demo-lite....no point in "winning" if your candidate is no different than the opposition...besides, Republicans lost twice in a row with RINOs....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.