Women rally outside Henrico court while judge hears abortion lawsuit

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Please enable Javascript to watch this video

HENRICO COUNTY, Va. -- A lawsuit backed by The Family Foundation of Virginia, a Richmond-based pro-life group, aimed at overruling abortion regulatory rollbacks was heard Friday morning in Henrico Circuit Court. The Family Foundation funded the suit against the Virginia State Board of Health, Virginia Department of Health, and VDH Commissioner Dr. Marissa Levine.

Victoria Cobb, the foundation's president, said the lawsuit targeted Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe and his administration's political motives in rollback abortion clinics regulations.

"I want the judge to say that the rule of law matters and how the Governor and his appointees rollback regulations," Cobb said. "We think it matters a whole lot to the Commonwealth of Virginia and the people who elected these folks that political favors are not done illegally."

Victoria Cobb

The regulations, passed by the Virginia General Assembly and signed by Republican Governor Bob McDonnell in March 2011, required "any facility in which five or more first trimester abortions per month are performed" to be retrofitted and regulated as if it were a hospital.

Progress Virginia and Pro-Choice groups said the regulations put the state's 14 women's clinics that provided abortions in danger of closing.

In 2014, Governor McAuliffe instructed the Board of Health to review the targeted regulation of abortion providers (TARP )law. The regulations were subsequently repealed.

Attorney Daniel Carrell represents Itzel Melendez, one of four plaintiffs in the case. While the mother of eight never had an abortion, Carrell said she was adversely affected by the rollback because it threatened her health if she wanted an abortion in the future.

He argued that the time frame in which the public was able to comment on the rollback was too narrow and only open for a short period of time.

"Melendez, a woman of child bearing age, believes her health and safety would be compromised if she were to feel the need to use the facilities in the future," Carrell argued.

Prior to the hearing, about 50 pro-choice advocates from groups like the ACLU, NARAL Pro Choice Virginia, and Planned Parenthood rallied outside the Henrico Courthouse holding signs and yelling chants.

"What [the regulations] do is put access to reproductive healthcare in jeopardy," Nicole Grim, a representative from NARAL, said. "These targeted restrictions of abortion providers aim is to close down and chip away access to reproductive health care services like safe legal access to abortion in Virginia."

The judge said he would return a written decision on the lawsuit in about two weeks.