Be persistent, resist the lies and disinformation. Even on this forum, because there are people employed by the
Satanic Oligarchy to dismiss the information about child sexual abuse and other issues too.

"Its ten days since I raised a question about intelligence suggesting a paedophile ring that touched the very heart of a previous government. Id done so because a very credible retired child protection professional had lived with a gnawing suspicion of a cover up for many years.

Since then though, many more ordinary people have contacted me about suspicions they have had of a wider wrongdoing in some cases so heinous it made me cry.

They have talked of psychopaths marking children with Stanley knifes to show ownership. They tell of parties where children were passed around the men. They speak of golf course car parks being the scenes for child abuse after an 18 hole round.

And they have named powerful people some of them household names who abused children with impunity.

Two former police officers have raised their concerns of cover-ups. Child protection specialists have raised their fears that the network of convicted paedophile Peter Righton, the nexus of the group, was wider than at first thought. Others have identified a former cabinet minister who regularly abused young boys.

Some have raised mysterious early deaths, disappeared children, suspicious fires, intimidation and threats.

Its bewildering.

Yet the thing I learnt most from the hacking scandal, and for that matter, the Savile case, is that the intelligence was staring the police in the face. These people were hiding in daylight. So powerful, so brazen in their actions, those who had an inkling of what was happening turned a blind eye.

Or maybe none of this happened. Maybe the 50 plus emails and numerous phone calls and letters I have received were all from fantasists. Maybe the allegations of the victims made for many years, consistently to anyone that would listen, maybe theyre bogus.

The hacking scandal was about the police failing to follow clear leads of wrongdoing by powerful people. They could do this because politicians turned a blind eye.

This is potentially worse. Some of those powerful people involved in a cover up may well have been and could still be powerful politicians.

Im not going to let this drop despite warnings from people who should know that my personal safety is imperilled if I dig any deeper. Its spooked me so much that Ive kept a detailed log of all the allegations should anything happen."

In my opinion Tom Watson MP has been threatened and/or blackmailed to keep his mouth firmly shut now by those in power.

The powerful families who control all the biggest corporations don't like anyone working in the system that they don't have leverage over

There's that scene in 'in the thick of it' where during a succession crisis for the post of prime minister a politician has to sheepishly admit that she can't run for the post because she has a gambling problem except that wouldn't stop her in reality because the el-ite WANT compromised people to be in positions of power

Then they can say ''you WILL support such and such legislation in parliament or those photos we showed you of you with that young kid will be sent to the newspapers''

or

''you WILL support a war in the middle east or we'll stop using our freemasonic assets in the police to cover for you''

This is why centralised power is ALWAYS doomed to fail because then the people that have to be controlled in order to control the entire game are relatively few

__________________
when the people in power want you dead, just existing is a revolutionary act

Sick bastard gets away without a prison sentence because he was an Eton educated paedophile with a high-profile lawyer father. (2016)

"That a convicted paedophile is able to avoid a jail sentence is an utter disgrace especially given pensioners get locked up for non-payment of TV licence fees; Old Etonian Andrew Picard shouldn’t be on the streets, he should be in the clink

Andrew Picard (AKA Andrew Laurence and Andrew Boeckman) was caught with 1,185 indecent images of children as young as eight on his computer. He admitted to possessing videos of a three year old being raped, children being forced to have sex with dogs and sharing indecent images on Skype with an undercover policeman yet he was spared jail and handed a derisory non-custodial sentence late last month.

Eton College, Berkshire and Williams College, Massachusetts educated former USA swimmer Picard – who changed his name from Andrew Boeckman to protect the supposed “good reputation” of his wealthy family during his trial – received a sentence of just 10 months imprisonment suspended for 18 months for ten counts of possessing child pornography in late February and thus, one must ask: “Why wasn’t he locked up?”

Justifying why he spared Picard of Probyn House, Page Street, Westminster jail and why he also decided not to place this privileged pervert and predator on the sex offenders’ register, Judge Peter Ross remarked:

“It has been said that you and your family have suffered deeply as a result of your arrest and public exposure. Your family didn’t deserve that… [Prison] would undo the counseling you have undergone”.

Sallie Bennett-Jenkins QC, defending, added:

“This is a young and very able man who has hopes for the future… He was able to have this opportunity [to seek help] and this was something Andrew sought for himself, by himself”.

In a country where our government actively pursues jail sentences for pensioners refusing to pay their TV licence fees, it is a disgrace that the son of a prominent American lawyer named Philip J. Boeckman manages to avoid prison in spite of the seriousness of his offences. This utterly contemptible decision is something that brings only shame on Britain."

He was protected by the powers that be, which aligns in England to the Deep State in the US. There is a system of corruption, BCBD,

First, one bribes the attendant power with money or more power. Then when something comes up one coerces that power with the threat of removal of power. Then after cooperation to those levels blackmail is easy. That person took bribes, looked the other way when crimes were committed, and so on. They buckle. If they do not buckle the Seth Rich solution is brought forth. Do our will or we will kill you and or your family. We've done it before and have nothing to lose.
The only people left are those very few, the Snowdens and the Assanges who are willing to not only be branded as criminals but risk everything, and who know enough to count.

When people ask you, how could this happen and no one know, this is why. The system is so corrupt it is beyond belief by any person with any moral sense. That is what we are dealing with. And we have to win.

The elite that run this planet know that the idea that it is abnormal for a man to be with a younger girl aged 9 to 19 when the man is well into his fifties or sixties has only been around for the last several hundred years and mostly in western countries. In third world nations it's very common for young girls to be married off so the very definition of abuse is not going to be uniform anywhere you travel in the world. How are you supposed to enforce a law when from land to land the laws and customs on this varies so much? Isn't this why the elite travel and trade with so many third world nations to begin with? I mean it must be that much easier to coax a young girl already accustomed to such behavior than to take one from your own culture right?

I don't want this thread to just focus on Savile, but it's not widely reported at leaset 20% of victims who came forward abused by Savile were men.

Jimmy Savile appeared on the front cover of the first edition of Gay News. Make of it what you will.

>>"When he died and a few people spoke up they felt safe"[/COLOR]

>>What do you mean?

I would think it was rather obvious what I meant. A dead person cannot sue you.

>>As far as the elite are concerned boys are being raped in far greater numbers than girls ... that's a politically incorrect thing to say, but it's the truth.

>>I'm not saying more homosexual men are committing pedeasty within the general public, BUT I AM SAYING MORE ABUSE WITHIN THE ELITE WAS COMMITTED AGAINST BOYS THAN GIRLS BY HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

As far as we know they are abusing more boys than girls. I've explained why.

>>I'm not saying more homosexual men are committing pedeasty within the general public, BUT I AM SAYING MORE ABUSE WITHIN THE ELITE WAS COMMITTED AGAINST BOYS THAN GIRLS BY HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

Then why did you post up random accounts of paedophiles abusing boys? It looks like you are saying most paedophiles are gay. I think you've changed your tune since our discussion.

And I've already explained why Savile appears on the front of Gay News. He was hosting a show talking about the subject of homosexuality. You know this and yet you post this image knowing you are spreading mistruths.

We don't know the elite are gay. We don't know if your average paedophile abusing boys are gay.

This isn't an issue -for you- about paedophiles. It's about your fantasy that being gay is bad and that bad people tend to be gay.

I would think it was rather obvious what I meant. A dead person cannot sue you.

>>As far as the elite are concerned boys are being raped in far greater numbers than girls ... that's a politically incorrect thing to say, but it's the truth.

>>I'm not saying more homosexual men are committing pedeasty within the general public, BUT I AM SAYING MORE ABUSE WITHIN THE ELITE WAS COMMITTED AGAINST BOYS THAN GIRLS BY HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

As far as we know they are abusing more boys than girls. I've explained why.

>>I'm not saying more homosexual men are committing pedeasty within the general public, BUT I AM SAYING MORE ABUSE WITHIN THE ELITE WAS COMMITTED AGAINST BOYS THAN GIRLS BY HOMOSEXUAL MEN.

Then why did you post up random accounts of paedophiles abusing boys? It looks like you are saying most paedophiles are gay. I think you've changed your tune since our discussion.

And I've already explained why Savile appears on the front of Gay News. He was hosting a show talking about the subject of homosexuality. You know this and yet you post this image knowing you are spreading mistruths.

We don't know the elite are gay. We don't know if your average paedophile abusing boys are gay.

This isn't an issue -for you- about paedophiles. It's about your fantasy that being gay is bad and that bad people tend to be gay.

Why are you so defensive and argumentative?

I haven't changed my tune. I'm consistent.

I say far more boys than girls (pro rata of the homosexual versus the heterosexual population) were and probably still are abused by elite people.

I'm not a homphobe ... I just want to understand the whys and hows.

It's not a secret the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Edward Heath was a homosexual paedophile who abused boys, not girls. He's just one example of many.

"Today MI5 was named as number one in Stonewall’s Top 100 Employers list for 2016, up from seventh in 2015. In second place was Lloyds Banking Group (third 2015), closely followed by the National Assembly for Wales in third (fourth 2015)."