Search form

Five Washington Excuses for Ignoring the Jobs Crisis

"Slowly but surely we are moving in the right direction. We're on the right track." ~ Barack Obama, Aug. 18, 2010

President Obama's pollyanish comments coupled with Press Secretary
Robert Gibbs' outburst against "the professional left" reveal just how
out of touch the Obama Administration is with the tens of millions of
everyday Americans who are engulfed by the jobs crisis.

Obama and Gibbs
are miffed at liberal pundits for complaining about the Administration's
concessions on everything from health care and financial reform to jobs
creation. But Obama's real problem isn't Arianna Huffington or Paul
Krugman. For now, liberals have no place else to go--and they'll never
cross over to the Republican Party.

Instead, the Administration should be very worried about the more
than 29 million Americans who have lost their jobs or are forced into
part-time work. Unemployment is stuck at 9.5 percent--and that's just
the narrowest measure of joblessness. The more accurate Bureau of Labor Statistics jobless rate (U6)
is over 16.5 percent. (This includes people who have stopped looking
for jobs and those working part-time involuntarily.) Five workers are
competing for every job opening while the average length of unemployment
is over 35 weeks. If it weren't for unemployment insurance and food
stamps, we'd have Depression era soup kitchen lines going round the
block.

Since the 1930s struggling workers like these have flocked to the
Democratic Party, which they viewed as the party of jobs. Now they're
not so sure, and the party risks losing its mass base

Our current unemployment trough, by far the longest and deepest since
1937, directly violates the social compact that glues together modern
industrial societies -- the tacit commitment that business and
government will produce a full-employment economy. When that promise
goes unmet for long periods, chaos ensues. It is not an accident that
the rise of fascism in Europe during the 1930s corresponded with a
prolonged period of high unemployment. Unfortunately, rearmament and war
also are tools to put people back to work. Our political and business
leaders are playing with fire by failing to seriously address the jobs
crisis.

Wall Street gamblers tore an enormous hole in our economy, destroying
8 million jobs in a matter of months. Those jobs still haven't come
back and may never return. Therefore, it is the fundamental purpose of
government to relentlessly attack the problem, just as we did during the
Depression, with long-term funding to get people into decent,
sustainable jobs. But instead of shouldering this responsibility, far
too many politicians and public officials of both parties hide behind
spurious arguments. Here are a few of the most outrageous:

"The unemployed have only themselves to blame": It's
remarkable how many politicians and pundits argue that joblessness is
sky-high because unemployed people haven't developed "the skills they
need to compete successfully in the 21st century." We expect that kind
of twisted logic from anti-worker conservatives who think that
unemployment insurance keeps workers from finding jobs (even if there
are no jobs). But it's downright pathetic when a Democratic
administration sings from the same hymnal. Here's Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner at the pulpit:

"The share of workers who have been unemployed for six
months or more is at its highest level since 1948, when the data was
first recorded, and we must do more to ensure that they have the skills
they need to re-enter the 21st-century economy."

Dear Tim: Now that your Wall Street buddies have wrecked the economy
and you've bailed them out, there are no jobs--except maybe for
derivatives traders. What skills enable people to find nonexistent jobs?

"Unemployment is a lagging indicator -- the jobs are coming":
The Obama Administration and Democratic Party leaders fall prey to
their own version of trickle down economics when they argue that their
mammoth Wall Street bailout and puny, short-lived stimulus program will
bring back jobs for regular Americans (eventually).

Money was no object when it came to bailing out every bank and
investment house that could possibly be put on life support. By some
estimates the financial sector got over10 trillion in bailouts.
Economists Nouriel Roubini and Stephen Mihm estimate that Goldman
Sachs alone got60 billion in direct and indirect taxpayer largess. This
huge cash infusion worked like a charm: Financial elites quickly got
back to collecting fat bonuses and reopened their casinos, setting the
stage for Financial Collapse 2. The Administration looked the other way.

Then came a modest stimulus package designed to prime the pump with
tax cuts, public works bills and programs to quickly push money into the
economy. The Administration hoped that this primed pump -- plus a
resuscitated financial sector -- would bring unemployment down below 8
percent by the mid-term elections.

Unfortunately, that part of the plan didn't work: The stimulus was
far too small and diffuse to restore the millions of jobs that the
financial gamblers had destroyed. We now need 22 million new jobs to get
back to 5 percent unemployment. That's a tall order -- the equivalent
of creating 640 Apple Computer companies, with 34,000 employees each.

"We can't afford a job creation program -- it'll increase the deficit": It's
certainly true that the deficit is growing rapidly as a result of the
Wall Street crash and bailouts. But if we want the deficit to shrink,
we'll have to put people back to work so that they start paying taxes
again. We also need to place a significant windfall profits tax on the
very financial elites who wrecked the economy. We wouldn't have a
deficit problem if our politicians had the will to truly tax the
super-rich -- those earning3 million or more a year. (More on this
below.)

"US workers are overpaid. Cut wages by about 20 percent and the jobs will come back": Apparently
many officials and business leaders actually believe this. Fed Chief
Ben Bernanke, for example, argues that during the Great Depression,
workers' refusal to take more wage cuts during a period of deflation
kept employers from hiring, driving unemployment to new heights.
So...now that Wall Street has run off with the taxpayers' money, the
taxpayers need to live with less so they can have jobs. (Never mind that
we've already stumbled through decades of stagnant wages.) Wage cuts
indeed are badly needed -- on Wall Street.

"Government interference is creating uncertainty in the private sector and keeping companies from creating new jobs":
The government haters, reinforced by the know-nothing Tea Partyites,
really believe that if government would just leave private enterprise
alone, it would generate jobs for all. Maybe these folks didn't notice
that the crash we just lived through happened precisely because the
government let the free market run wild. It's probably impossible to
convince ideologues that the private sector can't police itself or
create millions of new jobs all on its own -- even though we've known
this for more than 80 years.

The Republican Party, hiding behind this ideology, hopes to see the
economy collapse again so it can reap the rewards in November. (Might
the giant Wall Street firms quietly engage in a capital strike to retard
economic growth and help anti-regulatory Republicans recapture
Congress? No, they wouldn't do that... Would they?) The Republicans are
hoping that by the time they take power again, the economy will quickly
right itself and they can take the credit. That and the Tooth Fairy will
bring us new jobs. The Republicans are playing a very dangerous game
that is likely to worsen an already severe jobs crisis and send our
nation into uncharted and dangerous territory.

We can't tackle the jobs crisis until we're willing to tackle Wall
Street. Both Democrats and Republicans have stood idly by as the wage
gap has turned into a Grand Canyon of inequality. (In 1970, the top 100
CEOs made 45 times more than the average worker; in 2008, they made
1,081 times more. See The Looting of America)
Almost no one in Washington has the nerve to challenge Wall Street's
socially useless and reckless financial games. They're afraid to say
that it's wrong that the top 25 hedge fund managers made as much money
during 2009 as 658,000 teachers -- or that the top ten hedge fund managers "earn" $900,000 an hour.
The money for job creation is right there, in the hands of the elites
who profited so handsomely from the financial meltdown they helped
create.

The American people are hungry for proposals to rectify this
injustice. Why not turn Wall Street's ill-gotten gains into programs
that put our people back to work? Here's a plan we'll probably never
hear from Democrats, Republicans or the Tea Party:

Place a windfall profits tax on the super-rich who profited from our
bailouts to pay for the jobs that these gamblers destroyed.

Call it a windfall profits tax or a financial transaction fee. But
really it's reparations, long overdue. Tens of millions of Americans are
suffering through no fault of their own. These working people didn't
buy houses they couldn't afford. They didn't gamble their life's savings
on derivatives and securitization.. They just went to work one day and
were told their job was gone. They came home to find their neighborhood
disintegrating as the housing bubble burst around them. All thanks to
reckless financial games on Wall Street.

Unless the Obama Administration finally organizes a major assault on
the jobs crisis, there will be no relief for Mr. Gibbs or his boss. Many
angry Americans -- liberals and conservatives -- will turn against the
party in power.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do.

Further

This year's Martin Luther King Day comes with the usual dose of cognitive dissonance - the hateful Mike Pence is quoting him?! - along with an added shot of racist punk privilege from a mob of MAGA-hatted white boys of Covington Catholic who swarmed, taunted and jeered a Native American elder because they felt they could. King knew there is nothing new under the divisive sun. "This wasn't boys being boys," said one critic. "This is America being America."

Common Dreams brings you the news that matters.

Sign up for Newsletter

Connect With Us

Support our common dreams.

Can We Count on Your Help Today?

Common Dreams is a small nonprofit with a big mission. Every day of the week, we publish the most important breaking news & views for the progressive community. To remain an independent news source, we do not advertise, sell subscriptions or accept corporate contributions. Instead, we rely on readers like you, to provide the "people power" that fuels our work. Please help keep Common Dreams alive by making a contribution. Thank you. - Craig Brown, Co-founder