* Here’s a question I’ve seen debated in comments here and that I’ve debated with my Statehouse pals and my mom: Do you feel sorry for Treasurer Dan Rutherford? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.

No one forced Rutherford to get into politics. No one forced him to run for Governor. He knew he’d be under a microscope. It’s almost like he wanted much of this to happen. He and his supporters can go around and blame whoever for his problems but: the guilty only need look in the mirror.

A week ago, I would have answered differently. But he squandered all good will and disrespected those who had been giving him the benefit of the doubt when he backtracked on the report. And that’s why his campaign is done - 100% his fault.

More no than yes. It’s hubris, and that’s on him. He took a bad situation and made it much much worse. Nobody’s fault but his.

For me, the story about how he treated the young man who was driving him sealed it for me. No sympathy after that.

If Rauner hadn’t pushed the rumor, someone else would have. That Rutherford didn’t anticipate it is a mystery. And the accusations from Treasurer office employee(s) was also either within his control or predictable.

voted NO my thoughts are: he’s holding back on releasing the report because it shows he did have employees working on his campaign while on state time and pay. as long as he has been around, he should know better. he was my choice before this. as far as sexual orientation, I could not care less, it is a non issue to me. I have never understood why pols on both sides of the aisle do not seem to think the rules apply to them.

No. To feel sorry for him you have to believe he had no control over the circumstances. He’s been running for higher office since he graduated from college and doesn’t care how many people he steps on to get there. The environment in his office was created by him. I also find the political work accusation to be quite credible.

Any of them who get into this business must be aware of the business they are in every day. Sorry Dan, this is on you for not anticipating this as a campaign element, for the poor response to the accusations and for the alleged behavior itself.

I voted more no than yes. I still think this accuser is contrived and is indirectly related to the Rauner campaign.

That being stated, Dan is well aware of his circumstances. He’s been the subject of rumors, as well as direct questions regarding his sexuality. He has responded with answers and reactions to those that have surprised, confounded, and disappointed many. Rich Miller even mentioned that long ago in a controversy over Dan’s campaign fund buying the district legislative office, that Rutherford indicated that he knew what attack’s he’d face in future races.

While it is unfortunate that we both belong to a Party that likes to call itself conservative but all too often cannot wait to peek in your bedroom or orifices, knowing these circumstances it is baffling why Dan would put himself in the position he has with sharing rooms, creepy behavior, etc.? (I’m putting aside the imperial behavior that too many of us have overlooked that became disgusting when he was elected state treasurer.)

It’s nearly always sad to see someone’s lifetime dream to be dashed, but this is mostly Dan’s fault.

He should get out, indicate he will work to clear his name and reputation, and determine where next life will take him. I’m guessing elective office will not be achievable, but who knows? If so, however, I hope he can come to terms with that and his true self.

No;
His preemptive news conference to announce the allegations might have been a good idea… Had he actually stated what those allegations were and denied any wrongdoing, but he didn’t…

Then he had another poor news conference when the lawsuit was filed the following Monday, almost as if he didn’t know which story he should tell.

Then he refused to release the results of the independent investigation that he ordered… This was the nail in the coffin for him and is probably when my answer changed from “more no than yes” to a straight “no”.

And now he still won’t release it, though he says he wants to but won’t because it is against the advice of counsel… Oh, don’t give me that BS! Don’t say “I can’t” because counsel advised against it; it’s advice that you can either heed or not Mr. Rutherford, don’t use counsel as an excuse for covering up whatever is in the report.

Oh, and by the way, if neither he nor his counsel has read the report, as Rutherford is claiming, how do they know that they don’t want it released?!?

Not anymore. The long whispering campaign isn’t the issue (unless sometime down the road he admits he lied about it, then that would be the issue). The allegations, and the hiding of the results of the investigation are, for me. That, and the mistreatment of that staffer. I was similarly mistreated by a top government official back in the day when I was a fresh-faced intern, and I never forgot it. I judge people on how they treat those that work for him. If true, that episode was reprehensible.

I feel sorry for Dan Rutherford, a human being who is going through a tremendously public and painful collapse of his lifelong ambition. At the same time, Treasurer Rutherford has been in public life for 20+ years and could have avoided all of this if he had behaved differently. That is not to speak to his “guilt” or “innocence” in regards to the charges. It is merely to suggest that interviews of his staff obviously reveal things that he and/or his attorneys feel would damage his reputation if they were revealed. This tells me that Treasurer Rutherford has behaved in ways that he’d prefer to keep hidden from the voters.
As I said, I do feel sorry for Dan, the person… even if he is not blameless.

I do not like how Rutherford has conducted himself throughout this controversy. I seriously question his wisdom and judgment in terms of how he has run this campaign and administered the Treasurer’s office.

My sympathy is based upon the whispering campaign tactics that his accuser has used before the lawsuit made his name public. There are elements that make this look like a vendetta or a shakedown.

I still feel that for the good of the party Rutherford ought to step aside. I cannot envision any scenario in which he plays any role other than that of a spoiler.

I feel sorry for the guy, but he also chose this business. He needed to do a self vetting through a group who could do a brutal check on his background to see where he could be drilled by the competition. Your ego can rationalize problems for a long time, but you can only temporarily elude reality before it comes back to bite you.

No. Dan has been a part of the system for many years and knows how it operates. Even if he is innocent of all allegations, he has handled the situation in the worst way possible, which does not instill confidence in his judgment.

Nope. He exercised bad judgment in some of his management decisions (i.e. bunking with subordinates). Then, he goes ballistic claiming that there is a conspiracy, but has no direct evidence. Finally, he promises to release the report, then refuses to do so.

I wonder if Rutherford realizes that by staying in the race, he’s actually helping the person that he claims was out to get him. Poetic.

No more than yes. At least at the outset. The innuendo by the major Chicago newspapers was despicable - low beyond low. Regardless of DRs personal reality, pumping up the rhetoric like that is beyond the pale. DR should have known stuff was gonna happen at some point, or maybe since he didn’t get dinged while in the GA or at the Treasurer’s office, he thought he would get a pass in the gov office. A tenderfoot mistake, not like a veteran to ignore that reality.

DRs handling of this issue once it started to unfold is pathetic. His refusal to reveal a taxpayer funded internal investigation borders on the corrupt, IMO. His use of that to fish for info as to his exposure is a gross abuse of the taxpayers money.

I was in his corner until he refused to release the report. Also, I donated to his campaign prior to the Friday press conference. The check just cleared, obviously deposited after the refusal to release the report and after he decided to not run future ads. I won’t miss any meals because of the donation but it really puts a bad taste in your mouth.

More no because it has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Rutherford put to powder keg under his seat, but he lit it with the Friday press conference and added more dynamite with the internal investigation that he won’t read or let the public read. Reality check time came a couple weeks ago, but he won’t admit it. The fat lady has been singing so long she lost her voice.

I voted “more no than yes.” Without knowing the details of the investigation, I would normally want to give him the benefit of the doubt. I always liked the Treasurer, and I agree with wordslinger about all of the sleazy innuendos put forth by the media. I felt sorry for him with regard to that. But the refusal to release the report and the whining about politics being a bloodsport (he’s just now realizing this?)…well, my sympathy is really starting to wane.

I’m disappointed. I wouldn’t say that Rutherford’s judgement was terrible, at least up until he didn’t release the report. Not releasing the report could be good judgement for him personally, but bad for his campaign. You’ve got to protect yourself first and the governorship might have already slipped through his fingers.

The allegations do seem implausible and either politically motivated or motivated by vengeance. I think there’s a good possibility that the accuser doesn’t have enough for a case, but knew that the investigation and accusations would tank the campaign and perhaps Rutherford’s career.

So I do feel sorry for Rutherford. If he’s innocent, he got played a bad hand and it speaks to how crappy humans can be. If he’s guilty, the courts will show it.

As others said, the true loser is the Republican Party. Between Quinn and Rauner, I don’t see things being good for Republicans over the next 4 years.

Rutherford had to know these charges were pending.
He should have made sure he was in the clear. As a executive here should never have shared are room with a subordinate.
Advice from my lawyer is generally viewed as guilty by the public.

It would be easy to feel sorry for Treasurer Rutherford, but this is the big leagues. While the Rutherford camp got out in front of the story, it was done clumsily at best. Now the “on advice of counsel” dance really makes Dan personally seem silly and hiding something “on … advice…” No, sorry but a thorough cleansing is what’s needed, and I don’t see that forthcoming.

I agree with many posters who felt bad for him early on in this story’s development.

But a couple days into it, I started feeling less sorry for him. And it isn’t just the way he has handled the sexual harassment charges, but it is the charges themselves.

I had a problem with the “just harmless fun / a misunderstanding” defense from a person in such political power. This is the type of defense, even if he did believe it, that men who harass women often use. I wonder if I and other centrists and liberals were being, if anything, more patient with Rutherford because the allegation happened to be same sex harassment than we would have been if this was Rauner harassing a female subordinate.

We can still only guess at what the evidence is, but since he is resisting releasing them after saying he would release them, my current guess is that there are some serious allegations and corroborations of those allegations. So the coverup and handling of the allegations isn’t necessary worse than the actions themselves, if they prove true.

Forget governor; will he be forced to resign as treasurer before his term is up?

more yes than no. I’ve always like Dan and I do believe he is a good and honest man, so in that sense I feel sorry for him. I feel bad for him that this has come about in the manner that it has. however, I am not pleased that he won’t release the internal investigation report and that is on him.

He does not particularly treat rank and file employees at the treasurer’s office with any real respect and has not valued the work they perform on behalf of the office. He has been running for governor since the day he took office as state treasurer. When the only loyalty that you can instill in those around you is what you can afford in the way of patronage positions, you can’t be very surprised to find that that kind of “loyalty” doesn’t run very deep.

Of course I do. This is the second time he’s been thrown under the bus, and while he hasn’t handled it well, people are going to believe much worse of him than that he’s an innocent man who hasn’t handled it well.

“He should just come out of the closet”

And comments like that show we’re not even talking about the same thing.

I voted no because Dan should have had the courage to have come out of the closet before he got thrown out of the closet by a disgruntled employee. If Dan is found innocent of all of this guy’s charges, then I will apologize. Dan is a really likeable guy. I think he would do a good job as governor. But, if he thought that no one (GOP or Democrat) was going to ever challenge his sexual activities in the past, then his ego had overrun his sense of reality. When you run for a public office that is this important, then you know that the microscopes and spotlights are going to be coming out to analyze you and your past.

Frosty, because other GOP politicians here have gotten away with the unconvincing blanket denial, DR probably thought he could as well. They could say no comment or it’s none of your business, but then everyone assumes it’s true. So they say no wink wink and in the past it’s been accepted at face value.

More yes than no, because he has been enmeshed in an important Run for Governor, and as Illinois Treasurer (and in his prior elected posts), he had apparently been a decent Public Official overall, (though those days MAY be strictly numbered now)…but just the sheer TIMING of the As-Yet UNresolved Sexual Harassment and Unethical Political Work Demand Allegations, nevertheless, have literally been BRUTAL for him and will end his campaign in Defeat, one way or another. That’s why it is somewhat sad to a degree.

And yet, if he DID engage in wrongful conduct, although more TRAGIC then, but there’s no WAY DR should be Governor if it, or some of it, turns out to be true, and in which case it would THEN be difficult to feel sorry for him any longer…!

More yes then no, because he doesn’t realize his situation. He still tries to carry on, but at this point he is just rearranging deck chairs. His campaign has hit the iceberg.
If he gets convicted of a federal crime related to his state office, he could lose his state pension. He should quit the race and concentrate on his legal defense.

I feel sorry for anyone who would spend years working very hard toward a single goal, and because of a few relatively bad judgement calls sees the entire effort circle the drain, so I chose the more yes then no choice, because he still made the bad judgement calls and should have known better.