The people Jeremy and Smegma watch make second hand Kermit the Frog impressions.

There's the difference.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

French toast sticks

Total Posts: 79Member Since: 2/6/2015Location: never seen late pass noob dafuq is that shit smh

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:42:58 PMJeremy posts a video then quotes it and lols at it in a different poast.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Porkelin

Total Posts: 570Member Since: 2017

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:53:43 PMI happen to agree with his point that power demands respect. The only substantive criticism in that video was the deconstruction of his search engine experiment, but the point of it was just vague insinuation, so the Chapo dudes had to resort to speculation to attack his argument, which, to be fair, is exactly what Peterson called for by the sound of it. What he did explicitly say was that Google intends to shape people's perception through its algorithm in one way or another. I don't know, I just didn't find it persuasive enough to completely discredit Peterson, which is what it seemed like they were trying to do.For the record, what I saw when image searching "bikini" on Google was female models in bikini. On Bing I saw a lot more of plain bikinis, as cartoons or as ads, and there was shaving tools for your bikini line... So I guess Google is either more accurate or more narrow in its results, depending on how you wanna look at it.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Maffmatics (Admin)

Total Posts: 25103Member Since: 2010Location: I知 a founding member of an organization called Deep Green Resistance

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:57:30 PMThe highlight from the Channel 4 interview if you aint got time fo dat:

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 7:20:54 PMYou know why you don't see the great minds of today battling it out with Jordan Peterson? because he isn't relevant. That is why you get nothing but a smart comedy show making fun of him.

He has some fair points but he essentially bounces back between a dishonest libertarian, and a frantic al-right panderer. I mean this fucking douche thinks the most important thing to debate is whether or not we should call someone by a preferred pronoun.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Groucho Marxist

Total Posts: 466Member Since: 2017Location: U.S.S.R.

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 7:33:11 PMRogan gets some good voices from the left sometimes but no scholars. If you put up Miachael Parenti, or Noam Chomsky on JRE, Peterson would look like he went full retard.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Maffmatics (Admin)

Total Posts: 25103Member Since: 2010Location: I知 a founding member of an organization called Deep Green Resistance

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 8:49:38 PMChannel 4, one of the biggest channels in the UK puts Peterson up and Jeremy thinks he isnt relevant.

Ever heard of Film4? Part of Channel 4.

Maybe you should check stuff out before saying a bunch of stupid shit.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Porkelin

Total Posts: 570Member Since: 2017

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 9:02:17 PMThe pronouns are important because of what they implicate. They implicate compelled speech. That's what Peterson has a problem with. He's not refusing to use the pronouns to disrespect transgendered people. He should have every right to disrespect them if he wanted to, but that's not the reason. He was speaking against that legislature because it infringes on free speech by implementing obligatory ideological speech. What's more is he doesn't subscribe to the ideology in question. And neither should he. The whole LGBTQIA movement is toxic. Radical leftism is the strongest in social workers' domains. That's the people who take care of your kids while you're at work! They're actually starting to encourage transgenderism at kindergartens, and there are actual parents who let their children (who are under the age of consent, let's remember exactly what that means!) go through sex changes. It's ridiculous, it's abhorrent, and it's completely taboo in leftist bubbles. No one dares to speak about it because they've spent so much time condemning people who are against these special groups. It's identity politics gone berserk!But that's secondary. Writing law that demands that you any type of specific speech is immoral in itself, regardless of the politics behind the terms.He's the Rosa Parks of pronouns. Right. It might sound silly to you, but it doesn't to me. First of all, as Jordan Peterson has said before, it's completely impractical given the multitude of pronouns, but what's more important is the manner in which it's forced through! You can't demand of people to change the way they speak! That's downright Orwellian! You really don't want the state micromanaging your social interactions. It leads to even more socially awkward and repressed miserable man-boys unable to grow up, scared shitless of hurting women's feelings, ashamed to be themselves to the extent that they'll cut up their dicks to form vaginas so that they can be glorified victims instead of self-loathing oppressors. It's fucking pathetic. And beyond that, it's bordering on totalitarianism. You think the threat of right-wing totalitarianism is bad under Trump? Look at the backlash against him. That movement is much more likely to instate totalitarianism than fucking Trump is.Would you support trans-racialism? Changing your ethnicity to better suit your identity? Crazy people would start undergoing surgical black face, anyone who called them crazy would be labeled a bigot without the least sense of irony, and kids would encouraged in kindergarten to ruin their lives at the age of 3. All in the name of equality. The difference is that it's more biologically viable for you to claim you're a different race than it is for you to claim you're a different gender.And what does Chomsky ever speak about other than how fucking terrible USA is? He has no solutions other than "stop doing bad things". He's a well-read simpleton. And America is not bad considering just how fucked up the rest of the world is. It'd be career suicide for Joe Rogan to have him on his podcast. Not because Joe Rogan would look like an idiot, but because Chomsky would make the show a total snooze-fest. It'd be a terrible traffic hazard to commuting listeners.And you say Jordan Peterson isn't relevant... By whose merits? Leftist media? He's irrelevant to them if they decide that he is, and they decide that he is if they don't agree with his message. Funny how that works...

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Porkelin

Total Posts: 570Member Since: 2017

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 9:02:45 PM#triggered

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Maffmatics (Admin)

Total Posts: 25103Member Since: 2010Location: I知 a founding member of an organization called Deep Green Resistance

Total Posts: 25103Member Since: 2010Location: I知 a founding member of an organization called Deep Green Resistance

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 9:20:49 PMAlso i cosign the fuck out of your America not being that bad point. Without delving into what our countries do overseas, being a citizen of the nations we live in gives us an incredible level of freedom compared to most of the world. Where in the Middle East are you free to be LGBT? Apart from Israel, the country Jeremy detests.

People that think its shit to live in the west are unappreciative cunts. You wanna say we do shitty stuff abroad then i will agree, although it's not like we are the only nations that meddle, but just to have the right to speak up on issues that bother us is something many countries won't have for a very long time.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Porkelin

Total Posts: 570Member Since: 2017

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 10:12:41 PMRight! People need to understand that we've never had it this good in the history of civilization. It might not be the utopia of your wildest dreams, but it's pretty good, so something's done right.

dude I hae to repost your comment so I can read it.The pronouns are important because of what they implicate. They implicate compelled speech. That's what Peterson has a problem with. He's not refusing to use the pronouns to disrespect transgendered people. He should have every right to disrespect them if he wanted to, but that's not the reason.

He was speaking against that legislature because it infringes on free speech by implementing obligatory ideological speech. What's more is he doesn't subscribe to the ideology in question.

And neither should he. The whole LGBTQIA movement is toxic. Radical leftism is the strongest in social workers' domains. That's the people who take care of your kids while you're at work! They're actually starting to encourage transgenderism at kindergartens, and there are actual parents who let their children (who are under the age of consent, let's remember exactly what that means!) go through sex changes.

It's ridiculous, it's abhorrent, and it's completely taboo in leftist bubbles. No one dares to speak about it because they've spent so much time condemning people who are against these special groups. It's identity politics gone berserk!

But that's secondary. Writing law that demands that you any type of specific speech is immoral in itself, regardless of the politics behind the terms.

He's the Rosa Parks of pronouns. Right. It might sound silly to you, but it doesn't to me. First of all, as Jordan Peterson has said before, it's completely impractical given the multitude of pronouns, but what's more important is the manner in which it's forced through! You can't demand of people to change the way they speak! That's downright Orwellian!

You really don't want the state micromanaging your social interactions. It leads to even more socially awkward and repressed miserable man-boys unable to grow up, scared shitless of hurting women's feelings, ashamed to be themselves to the extent that they'll cut up their dicks to form vaginas so that they can be glorified victims instead of self-loathing oppressors. It's fucking pathetic. And beyond that, it's bordering on totalitarianism. You think the threat of right-wing totalitarianism is bad under Trump? Look at the backlash against him. That movement is much more likely to instate totalitarianism than fucking Trump is.

Would you support trans-racialism? Changing your ethnicity to better suit your identity? Crazy people would start undergoing surgical black face, anyone who called them crazy would be labeled a bigot without the least sense of irony, and kids would encouraged in kindergarten to ruin their lives at the age of 3. All in the name of equality. The difference is that it's more biologically viable for you to claim you're a different race than it is for you to claim you're a different gender.

And what does Chomsky ever speak about other than how fucking terrible USA is? He has no solutions other than "stop doing bad things". He's a well-read simpleton. And America is not bad considering just how fucked up the rest of the world is.

It'd be career suicide for Joe Rogan to have him on his podcast. Not because Joe Rogan would look like an idiot, but because Chomsky would make the show a total snooze-fest. It'd be a terrible traffic hazard to commuting listeners.

And you say Jordan Peterson isn't relevant... By whose merits? Leftist media? He's irrelevant to them if they decide that he is, and they decide that he is if they don't agree with his message. Funny how that works...

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Porkelin

Total Posts: 570Member Since: 2017

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 10:31:53 PMAlright, well, I'm off. Talk to you later Groucho. Have a good one.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

metafive

Total Posts: 424Member Since: 2017

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 10:34:24 PMPeterson is the most trending person on the internet right now.

lol at not relevant.

what a tiny universe you live in.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Groucho Marxist

Total Posts: 466Member Since: 2017Location: U.S.S.R.

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 10:53:34 PMOk that is a lot to unpack there but let me start by saying that Jordan Peterson is the one making it about pronouns. This is where the confusion lies. The bill known as c-16 is more clear that they are referring to hate speech which is further defined in Canadian criminal code and has to include some sort of desire and call for genocide.

Peterson is arguing against points that don't exist. If they were I would take his side, but as far as I can tell he is not.

What I am saying is that, for Jordan Petersons argument about the use of pronouns to be relevant he would have to prove himself that misusing pronouns is hate speech that can cause or call for genocide or a breach of the peace, which is also defined in Canadian law.

My dislike for him has come from his complete dishonesty about socialism, or communism. While he will criticize capitalism as well, you are never more than five minutes away from him singing it's praises. I don't believe he is dumb enough to believe everything he says about socialism or communism.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Groucho Marxist

Total Posts: 466Member Since: 2017Location: U.S.S.R.

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 10:55:15 PMI was the most mentioned name on twitter for 2 or 3 days because I told Talib kweli that poor white people are shot by police in the US just as often as poor black people.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

litney spears

Total Posts: 3413Member Since: 2017Location: Hail Satan but it's hard to hail a cab being black

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 11:12:13 PMif there痴 no gender pay gap then why are black women paid the lowest , dudes a freaking idiot that never has done any research

Partial IP: 224.194.89

litney spears

Total Posts: 3413Member Since: 2017Location: Hail Satan but it's hard to hail a cab being black

posted Wednesday, January 31, 2018 11:14:39 PMseems there is a big pay gap

Women in the U.S. who work full time, year round are typically paid only 80 cents for every dollar paid to their male counterparts. The wage gap has stagnated, with very little change since 2007. This gap in earnings translates into $10,086 less per year in median earnings, leaving women and their families shortchanged. This disparity is the top concern of working women. Although enforcement of the Equal Pay Act and civil rights laws and other progress, including increased access to reproductive health care, have helped narrow the wage gap over time, addressing the significant pay disparities that remain is critical for women and their families.

Equal Pay Is Crucial for All Women

Women of color are paid less than white, non-Hispanic men.

Black women working full time, year round typically make only 63 cents for every dollar paid to their white, non-Hispanic male counterparts. For Latinas this figure is only 54 cents, for Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander women it is 59 cents, and for Native women it is 57 cents. While Asian women working full time, year round are typically paid only 87 cents for every dollar paid to their white, non-Hispanic male counterparts, the wage gap is substantially larger for some subgroups of Asian women. The wage gap translates into an annual loss of $21,698 for Black women, $26,403 for Latinas, $24,007 for Native women, and $7,310 for Asian women. Closing the wage gap is, therefore, particularly important for Black, Latina, and Native women who have lower incomes, and are more likely to be in poverty than white, non-Hispanic women and Asian women.

Partial IP: .58.92.125

Tadow

Total Posts: 1149Member Since: 2017Location: I never trust a narcissist. But they love me.

Lol Maff is a dumb dick. lol I've watched a bunch of Jordan Peterson interviews. since Im able to think critically I'm able to see when he's making wild jumps of logic and coming to really stupid conclusions. He literally thinks that pronouns will be the downfall of society. At anyrate, he got shredded in the chapo traphouse and it was hil.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Maffmatics (Admin)

Total Posts: 25103Member Since: 2010Location: I知 a founding member of an organization called Deep Green Resistance

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 5:26:45 AMYou think critically but have never in your life made a poast with any substance, Smegma?

Your'e just as dumb as Jeremy who can't even figure out who wrote the wall-o-text itt.

KarimThe only way you can get outraged by the wage gap is by assuming there's no difference between men and women.

GrouchoSpecial groups get special treatment. Where does it say that hate speech is defined by calling to genocide? It's not. "Bias, prejudice or hate based" assault becomes aggravated assault. Everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

crackheadsmurfism

Total Posts: 2220Member Since: 2007Location: you're trying to water that seed and grow that seed into a plant and have sex with that plant

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 7:11:35 AMex junkie with a community college degree has the nerve to label people irrelevant.

fuck out of here you pretentious faggot

Partial IP: 224.194.89

CAChri$t(IE)

Total Posts: 8291Member Since: 4/26/2015Location: Trump is the 8 Diagrams of America

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 2:16:15 PMThose are the portions of the bill refering to hate speech.

Maff, I never said I, "fully support Hamas" I don't fully support any form of authority. Also, Hamas does not currently call for genocide of all Jews. We have been over this.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Porkelin

Total Posts: 570Member Since: 2017

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 2:25:24 PMRight, and bill C-16 says which groups are to be overprotected. So what's your point?

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Groucho Marxist

Total Posts: 466Member Since: 2017Location: U.S.S.R.

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 2:27:56 PMlol where does it say to over protect? how do you read that portion of the bill and think that is over protection?

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Groucho Marxist

Total Posts: 466Member Since: 2017Location: U.S.S.R.

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 2:28:47 PMtrevor?

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Maffmatics (Admin)

Total Posts: 25103Member Since: 2010Location: I知 a founding member of an organization called Deep Green Resistance

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 7:52:00 PMLink me to some poasts you made where you admitted Hamas did something wrong.You cant. I can link you to hundreds of poasts where you vehemently defended them.

You don't need to say you fully support Hamas, you already made it very clear.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Groucho Marxist

Total Posts: 466Member Since: 2017Location: U.S.S.R.

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 8:04:28 PMso fucking dumb

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Maffmatics (Admin)

Total Posts: 25103Member Since: 2010Location: I知 a founding member of an organization called Deep Green Resistance

posted Thursday, February 01, 2018 8:05:35 PMChallenge not accepted.

No surprise there.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Groucho Marxist

Total Posts: 466Member Since: 2017Location: U.S.S.R.

posted Friday, February 02, 2018 2:45:52 PMlink me to some posts where I fully supported Hamas. Are they better than the Israeli government right now? yep. easily. Almost everyone is better than the Israeli Government.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Phatbeets

Total Posts: 12777Member Since: 2009Location: I like what you bring to this site tho. You're like a fluffer on a porn set.

posted Saturday, February 03, 2018 4:17:09 AMArguing with hypocritical idiots is not a waste of time at all.

Partial IP: 224.194.89

NoHeadlights

Total Posts: 56079Member Since: 2006Location: i hope its lots of hard dark beats with hard drums!

posted Saturday, February 03, 2018 4:45:24 AMWhen karim and jerm agree on a subject, you pretty much know they're wrong

2 dorks teaming up

Partial IP: 224.194.89

Porkelin

Total Posts: 570Member Since: 2017

posted Saturday, February 03, 2018 10:40:26 AM"lol where does it say to over protect? how do you read that portion of the bill and think that is over protection?"

I say overprotection because everyone is already protected under the law. How do you read that and think it necessitates genocidal motives? One paragraph deals with genocide. The next deals with hate crimes. It's a complete non sequitur.They claim to need new laws. To say that people, who are deluded into thinking they're the opposite sex (how's that for social construct btw), need new laws to be safe, is, in fact, to overprotect them. It was already illegal to attack them. Now it's more illegal: It's illegal to attack them, plus it's illegal to do so on account of prejudice.You need to take into consideration C-16, C-46 and the precedent of what's considered "violence". LGBTQIA is a toxic movement. Pandering to them is a big mistake. We're talking about the delusions of mental ill people like they're just as viable as the most established branch of science there is; namely biology. And we don't even do it because they have convincing arguments. It's out of sheer pity.When they consider misidentification as an act of aggression, and the law says that an assault is technically aggregated if it's motivated by bias or prejudice, it's really easy to make the case that being misgendered justifies self defense. Tranny men will fuck up your bitch if she gets catty about them joining her in the shower, and they'd only be defending their human rights according to C-16.

Women who dress up as men might actually get intimidated by the rough nature of their new peers. That bulge in his pants might be a gun with hair trigger that's aiming at you! Support our PAC to disallow gun licenses for the transgendered and to have the existing gun licenses of newly transgendered people revoked on account of their mental disability being a societal hazard. It's a matter of national security, people!https://www.gofundme.com/3l1yli0/donate?pc=expt_ot_dn_toastbanner_w_v1