All the Perl that's Practical to Extract and Report

Navigation

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to
use the classic discussion system instead. If you login, you can remember this preference.

Please Log In to Continue

There's a much better reason to not pay any attention to pudge. That is that he's boring and shrill. He repeats the same arguments over and over again, presumably in the mistaken belief that spouting the same tired verbiage over and over again will make people believe him. That might work for the idiot masses, but it doesn't work for an intelligent audience. I expect that he knows this and he just wants attention.

My mother told me that ignoring such people would make them give up and go away. Online at least it really works. Yay/ignore!

Heh, you didn't know who Che Guevara was. It is common knowledge among everyone who's studied him, that he as a racist. I didn't "win" because you didn't respond, I "won" because I made an obviously true statement. I'm not the one who said "The black is indolent and a dreamer; spending his meager wage on frivolity or drink; the European has a tradition of work and saving..." that was Guevara.

See, pudge, you had to get the last word! And please recall how I pointed out that you often take some minor point and drive on that, while leaving the major points unresponded to? You never responded to where "Bush" was the topic of the original post, and now you do this Che thing. Many months later, you choose to put out an incomplete purported quote with no citation as demonstrating the Che Guevara is a racist. I suppose that an uncited incomplete quote more determines a man as a racist than a trip t

But pudge, you did not respond to the content of my alleged ad hominem attack. That failure would tend to support my assertion. I am ready for your response to the content of the alleged attack, in part because I am not sure which attack you refer to.Now, on Bush, let's make sure we are talking about the same thing. I refer to "Is the word Bush there in TorgoX's post?". You seem to say you dealt with that, and honestly, I do not see where. Now maybe that is stupid of me- I can not even find you dealing

I really wish I had time to respond to all this good stuff, but the job of responding keeps getting bigger and bigger. But I am prepared to be made to look foolish on one point.

"Where I argued that his implication was obvious."

I read the posts. I searched for "implication" and "obvious". And I assert that your argument is not there. A link that shows me that it is there will show me to be careless and a time waster. I will humbly apologize.

Ah, I see. I was arguing with phillup in that discussion too, and he linked to the discussion which explained it (although in a slightly different context). I took his posting of that link [perl.org] as the explanation.

There's history behind that discussion, which is why it is so short. But considering I was responding to phillup, I at that point considered the complaint answered. I now realize that was insufficient for you.

So to be clear: TorgoX was endorsing the quote, which directly referenced Bush by referring

To be clear: I take it that I do not have to humbly apologize and this topic does not show me to be a time waster, because your argument is not there. Apparently another arugment about another quote is somewhere else, however, and that might have been sufficient for me. Your new arugment in the recent post (new at least to me, after having done all I can to follow your posts in this area, and please make a citation if it is not new, but found somewhere I missed) is that:The use of the term "ownership soc

"THIS STRANGE TWENTIETH CENTURYThe worst of my asthma attack is over and I feel almost all right, though now and again I resort to my new acquisition, a French inhaler. It's extraordinary how much I miss Alberto. It's as if my flanks are unprotected from a hypothetical attack. I'm always turning round to tell him something and then I realize he's not there.

Well, there's not much to complain ahout: painstakingly well looked after, good food in ahundance and the expectation of going home to start my studies a

"The blacks, those magnificent examples of the African race who have maintained their racial purity thanks to their lack of an affinity with bathing, have seen their territory invaded by a new kind of slave: the Portuguese."

"The black is indolent and a dreamer; spending his meager wage on frivolity or drink; th

That is that he's boring and shrill. He repeats the same arguments over and over again, presumably in the mistaken belief that spouting the same tired verbiage over and over again will make people believe him.

Wow. You sure are stupid.

That might work for the idiot masses, but it doesn't work for an intelligent audience.