Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Politics

I am extremely fortunate to be a member of two organizations that recognize the Treaty of Waitangi as a document that dictates how they operate. It saddens and frustrates me that as a nation we still struggle with recognizing tangata whenua and what true bi-culturism really means. This lack of understanding has continually been exploited and has often fractured the political landscape and what we are witnessing now is a continuation of this. With Hone Harawira forming his new Mana Party and Don Brash grabbing the leadership of Act we see two new lines in the sand being drawn and the potential of cultural confusion and race based politics being a large part of the coming election.

We are never going to be able to be comfortable with our bi-cultural heritage unless we can really deal with the wrongs of the past and develop an effective way of respectfully moving forward. Don Brash claims that it just means everyone being treated the same and Hone would be the first to say that, when huge inequities of health and wealth exists between Maori and Pakeha, we have problems and we need Maori focussed solutions.

Defining what the Treaty means and developing a way to recognize it in a practical and meaningful way is complex and hugely challenging, but possible. My experience of the Green Party and NZEI Te Riu Roa has demonstrated to me how it can be done and it involves empathy, respectful communication and compromise. Sadly these factors are not common elements of how we do politics in this country and even under MMP we still have a system where the "winner takes all" and the majority can ignore the minority in decision making.

NZEI Te Riu Roa has been a Treaty based organization for over a decade and while stating the intent was a matter of a vote, acting on it has been a real journey of discovery and, to be honest, not always a smooth journey. Initially the organization was split into two separate strands to allow self determination of our Maori members, this was a useful initiative as Maori could then discuss their issues and determine what was important in forums that were culturally comfortable to them. While the two strand structure recognized the Maori voice and the way NZEI Te Riu Roa operated as a whole shifted in noticeable ways, ultimate decision making was still dependent on a majority vote and misunderstandings and mistrust still existed.

The separate nature of the strands had also meant a separation of the membership at a number of levels and communication between the two groups became problematic. Maori were expected, despite smaller numbers, to manage their own structures and attend their own meetings then also support the "mainstream" system as well. While Maori were expected to operate and work in both strands few Pakeha felt comfortable attending Maori hui, although they were welcome to do so.

Attempts were made to educate the general membership about what the Treaty meant to Maori and how it could be recognized effectively in the organization and the discussion that was generated was useful. While the two strands still exist NZEI Te Riu Roa has shifted to a new level of understanding, not only do we provide culturally supportive structures and celebrate diversity when we come together in our meetings, but we have started actually listening to each other with real empathy. We have discovered at long last that it is not only having the systems in place, or the money made available, it is continuing to talk together in honest ways and being open to new ideas and ways of approaching problems.

It will always be problematic when Maori are a minority in their own country and in any organization, that when giving "equal" status it then implies equal power. The sense of fairness for many becomes distorted when a minority group is allowed to possibly dictate to the majority and these are the feelings that Brash like to exploit. Where cultural diversity exists there can never be always one answer to a problem and if a monocultural system dominates it means a majority culture will likely dictate how all others will exist. This approach is really simple and easy for those like Don Brash but will essentially further create an imbalance of power and wealth and destroy the wonderful diversity that exists in Aotearoa.

We will truly reach a level of political maturity in this country when the likes of Hone doesn't feel the need to form yet another party to effectively represent his people. With the dissatisfaction of many Maori with the Labour Party and the Maori Party I would have hoped that they would look to the Green Party as the best vehicle for progressing their issues and concerns. Our recognition of the Treaty as a foundation document of our party makes us distinct from others and our democratic and consensus decision making processes are similar to those of Maori. Our recognition of the importance of the land we live on and the water and air we rely on also reflects shared values and kaupapa. When Maori and Pakeha can coexist in one political party and manage to feel that they can effectively be heard and represented by that party, then we will be closer to achieving something worth celebrating.

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Comments

I really enjoyed your post and your raise some interesting issues. I suppose I see the Mana Party as an example of self determination in action, where a wide divergence of views is housed under the tino rangatiratanga ethos. So The Mana party is first and foremost a party for tino rangatiratanga. Obviously the social justice and kaitiakitanga aspects are just as important and bound to self determination. But you know, I gave my party vote to the Greens last time and a few times before that. I'm still quite torn but I cannot see how i do anything other than give both to Mana. Baring any unforgivable error that is, and that can always happen but I can't see it. The best idea is for the two parties to go after different constituents and I think they do, although I may not be good example of that :)

Thanks for your honest response, Marty. I think that time can shape parties in ways we may not expect and personalities within them create different dynamics as ACT are discovering at the moment. I have the impression the Mana kaupapa is still developing and I hope it realizes its potential. Who knows , there may even be a future coalition that includes both Mana and the Greens.

Popular posts from this blog

The latest Unicef report has us languishing at the bottom of the developed world in relation to the health and welfare our children and youth. This report was based on the data our government collects and concerningly, with regards to child poverty, a ranking wasn't provided because of a refusal to follow standard practice (an admission of failure?). In many documented areas we are seriously neglecting our young people (ranking numbers are determined by the data provided from a maximum of 41 developed countries):Child Poverty (41/41?) I consider that we must be by far the worst in the developed world for child poverty when the Government refuses to use the same measures as other countries so that we can be ranked. Our Children's Commissioner and the Child Poverty Monitor currently state that 14% of our children suffer from material hardship. We have a much higher threshold to determine this and require 7 elements to recognise hardship, while most other countries use only two.…

Metiria Turei's AGM admission has exposed the inequality, racism and meanness that thrives in New Zealand society.

There are few people who can look back at themselves as young adults (18-24 years) without remembering past decisions and actions that we wish could be replayed with our current knowledge and experience. Times when we badly mismanaged relationships; broke the law and got away with it (or not); impulsively squandered money or said or did something stupid while intoxicated.

The National Government probably passed its "use by" date well before the last election. It has held power through clever PR and an affable Prime Minister, despite achieving little of note over nine years. However, John Key is no fool, he resigned because his money trading, sixth sense told him the odds of winning another term in 2017 were not great. The years of mismanagement were being increasingly revealed and the election would be the Opposition's to lose.

The Government is rapidly running out of excuses for its lack of competence. After nine years it is hard to blame the previous Labour Government for things that are happening now. The Global Financial Crisis occurred in 2007-2008 (a decade ago) and the Christchurch earthquake happened seven years ago. Whatever the country is dealing with now is largely down to National's governance.

What I find interesting is the eventual demise of this Government may be triggered by Melanie Reid's investigative work on th…