Dripping with desperation, US President Barack Obama attempted to sell his proposed deal with Iraq today.

Instead of explaining what was in the deal and how this would be good
for the United States and the world, Barack elected to traffic in fear
and bitchery.

The Hindu reports:President Barack Obama warned Congress that rejecting the nuclear
agreement with Iran would be the worst mistake since the invasion of
Iraq and would lead to "another war" in the Middle East.

Fear and lies, it was 2002 all over again.

Agree with me, he insisted, or there will be war.

Trust me, he argued, and that what I say is true because, after all, I just said it.

He didn't prove anything and basic fact checks of his statements tended to expose one lie after another.

“This deal is not just the best choice among alternatives—this is the
strongest non-proliferation agreement ever.” —President Obama

Except, of course, for the Nonproliferation Treaty! if its parties
were to comply with it. (I'm looking at you, President Obama.)

The President's tweets -- tweeted by someone other than the President
of course -- came during a speech he gave at American University, from
which a transcript will likely be posted on the White House website.

Obama, in truth, has zero evidence of Iran pursuing a nuclear weapon.
Zero. None. The claim that he halted a nuclear weapons program in Iran
is outrageous -- as crazy as Dick Cheney's claim that Iraq had nuclear
weapons.

Obama might claim he was only suggesting he'd halted a nuclear ENERGY
program, but the reader who would put that interpretation on his
statement, and combine it with an understanding that Iran's program has
been exclusively for energy, has got to be rare, given the propaganda
being pushed by Obama, his supporters, and his opponents.

Remarkably, neither the advocates of war, nor the momentary fans of
diplomacy, will point out that Iran has never threatened the United
States and has no nuclear weapons program.

Yes, it was 2002 all over again as Barack, like Bully Boy Bush before
him, used the threat of wars to try to push through what he wanted.
Fear mongering. FITS News observes:

“I know it’s easy to play on people’s
fears, to magnify threats … but none of these arguments hold up,” Obama
said during an address at American University.Really? All we know is Iran’s ruler – Hassan Rouhani – referred to the deal Obama negotiated as an “answered prayer.” That can’t be good.More to the point: In the same speech Obama blasted critics for
“playing on people’s fears,” he engaged in … wait for it … the exact
same fearmongering.“Let’s not mince words,” Obama said. “The choice we face is
ultimately between diplomacy or some form of war. Maybe not tomorrow,
maybe not three months from now, but soon.”

It was Bully Boy Bush who helped hardened divisions in the United States
with 'you're either with us or against us' nonsense which failed to
recognize that people could have honest disagreements.

Barack was supposed to usher in change.

He was going to do so much for the public dialogue.

He would be able to do this, you may remember, because he was not of the
baby boom. (He actually is by a baby boomer by most definitions of the
generation.)

He would be able to bridge the divide, dismiss the "Tom Hayden Democrats," and allow for better dialogue.

That was the argument.

Didn't hold up, but that was the argument.

Kevin Liptak (CNN) points out, "He declared that lawmakers risk damaging American credibility if they
vote to scuttle the deal and equated them with those who pushed for war
with Iraq -- and with the mullahs in Iran."

So if you opposed the deal, you are in league with the mullahs?

And the Legion of Doom as well?

Why not include them because this speech was the most idiotic political speech since Lois Griffin ran for mayor of Quahog on Family Guy
(and, using Brian's advice, Lois decided to repeatedly invoke 9/11) and
gave speeches while seeking the office and after being elected.

Attempting to persuade citizens to support a tax hike, Lois declares at
one point, "We have intelligence that suggests that Hitler is plotting
with -- with the Legion of Doom to assassinate Jesus using the lake as a
base."

That assertion would have fit right in with the ones Barack made today.

Meanwhile, Barack worked overtime to use Iraq to justify his deal with Iran.

Obama’s use of the Iraq War as a political cudgel against opponents
of the deal carries clear risks for the president. Obama has
consistently taken public credit for bringing the long and deeply
unpopular Iraq War to what he has called a responsible
end, but the Iraqi Army disintegrated last year in the face of the
Islamic State, and the militants have conquered vast swaths of the
country. Many critics — including prominent Democrats and an array of
current and retired senior military commanders — say that Obama’s rush
to withdraw American forces helped pave the way for the rise of the
Islamic State.In recent months, Obama has been forced to send roughly 3,000 U.S.
troops to train Iraqi forces and tribal fighters to take on the militant
group. The Pentagon has also spent almost one full year bombing Islamic
State targets in both Iraq and Syria.

Barack's sudden concern over those who supported the Iraq War has never
resulted in a litmus test for his own Cabinet. Hillary Clinton, John
Kerry, and many others who supported the Iraq War have been offered
posts by Barack but those who opposed the war -- US House Rep Maxine
Waters, Dennis Kuccinich, etc -- have not been offered Cabinet posts.