Are Candidates Missing The Big Picture?

President Obama speaks at the Fox Theater in Oakland, Calif., on Monday.

Saul LoebAFP/Getty Images

Listen

Listening...

/

Originally published on July 24, 2012 5:31 pm

If the stakes could not be bigger, why are the presidential candidates running such insubstantial campaigns?

On any given day, it seems like the debate is about whether President Obama thinks entrepreneurs built their own businesses or what year Mitt Romney gave up control of Bain Capital — instead of big solutions to fundamental problems like economic growth, energy or immigration.

"The gap between what we need and what we're getting is bigger than it has been at any point in my lifetime," says David Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration Cabinet official and now CEO of Foreign Policy magazine.

Rothkopf wants the president to talk more about the "grand bargain" he's willing to make with Republicans on the deficit, the tax code and entitlements.

"He's avoiding answering the big question, which is: How are you going to do better in the next four years than you've done in the past four years? How does he avoid the problems associated with the fiscal cliff? How does he stimulate growth?" says Rothkopf. "If we've got to create tens of millions of new jobs over the course of the next several years, how do we ensure that that happens and ensure it happens in a way that brings the greatest benefits to the most people in society? And the president simply isn't addressing those things, he's playing small ball just like Romney is."

The Obama team refutes this charge, saying it lays out the president's plan every day.

Romney, on the other hand, has made a conscious decision not to be more specific and he's candid about why. Romney says if he revealed more than broad promises to cut taxes and shrink the government the details would be used against him.

So instead of laying out his own governing vision, Romney has been trying to keep the focus on the president.

"The Romney campaign's theory of the race is the economy is bad, President Obama is not that popular," says William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard. "If they keep their head down, if they're cautious, if they don't offend any independent voters, the natural break at the end will be against the relatively unpopular incumbent and a pretty weak economy and they'll win. It could happen that way."

Romney certainly thinks so. In an interview with CBS this month, he said his path to victory depended on a relentless focus on Obama's handling of the economy. "As long as I continue to speak about the economy, I'm going to win," he said.

But a small but influential chorus of conservative voices — including the Wall Street Journaleditorial page and Kristol — are asking, what if he's wrong?

"As someone, you know, who hopes Romney wins, I just worry about that, because I do think history suggests that at the presidential level, it's hard to win by just playing not to lose," Kristol says. "People want to see the path you're going to take the country on. Reagan showed them that path in 1980. Bill Clinton showed that path in 1992. I don't think that Romney has yet showed them that path in 2012."

"By any measure, the Romney campaign is in pretty strong shape. The fact that he's even marginally ahead or marginally behind in the polls for July right now speaks for itself," he says. "Romney's doing good, but does he need more plans and more specifics? Yes, he does. Would it be better to have them and offer some fresh perspective on some of the issues, some of the things he wants to do as president? Yeah, probably so. There's no hurry right now."

Wait until the fall, says Rogers, when more voters are tuned in. It remains to be seen whether the Romney campaign plans to release a bold policy agenda anytime. Romney has put out a 59-point economic plan.

But when he boils it down, it's with this flip applause line: "What would I do? People ask me, 'What would you do to get the economy going?' And I say, 'Well, look at what the president's done and do the opposite," Romney said while campaigning in Virginia in May.

Political analyst Stu Rothenberg points out that both candidates are doing the wrong things for the right reasons.

"That is, Romney is trying to make the election a referendum on unemployment and the administration's performance. And the president, since he doesn't have a great record on jobs and the economy, has to make the election about Romney," Rothenberg says. "The problem is that they're running the right kind of campaigns to win an election. They're not running the right kind of campaigns to govern after the election."

That means whoever wins the White House won't have a mandate to tackle the long list of difficult problems that will have to be addressed after November.

Copyright 2013 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

President Obama and Mitt Romney have returned to campaigning after a pause in the wake of the Colorado shootings. Today, the Obama campaign once again blasted Romney for refusing to release more tax returns and Mitt Romney slammed the president on national security.

As NPR's national political correspondent Mara Liasson reports, this presidential campaign has been mostly focused on issues other than the main problems facing the country.

MARA LIASSON, BYLINE: In a new ad released today, even the president acknowledges that this campaign is not living up to its moment in history.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Sometimes, politics can seem very small, but the choice you face, it couldn't be bigger.

LIASSON: If the stakes could not be bigger, why are the candidates running such puny, insubstantial campaigns? On any given day, it seems like the debate is about whether Mr. Obama thinks entrepreneurs built their own businesses or what year Mitt Romney gave up control of Bain Capital instead of big solutions to fundamental problems like economic growth, energy or immigration.

DAVID ROTHKOPF: The gap between what we need and what we're getting is bigger than it has been at any point in my lifetime.

LIASSON: That's David Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration Cabinet official and now the CEO of Foreign Policy magazine. Rothkopf wants the president to talk more about the grand bargain he's willing to make with Republicans on the deficit, the tax code and entitlements.

ROTHKOPF: The president's avoiding answering the big question, which is, how are you going to do better in the next four years than you've done in the past four years? How does he stimulate growth and ensure it happens in a way that brings the greatest benefits to the most people in society. And the president simply isn't addressing those things. He's playing small ball just like Romney is.

LIASSON: The Obama team rejects this charge, saying it lays out the president's plans every day. Romney, on the other hand, has made a conscious decision not to be more specific and he's candid about why. Romney says, if he revealed more than broad promises to cut taxes and shrink the government, the details would be used against him, so instead of laying out his own governing vision, Romney has been trying to keep the focus on the president.

Bill Kristol is the editor of the conservative Weekly Standard magazine.

WILLIAM KRISTOL: The Romney campaign's theory of the race is the economy's bad. President Obama is not that popular. If they keep their head down, if they're cautious, the natural break at the end will be against the relatively unpopular incumbent in a pretty weak economy and they'll win. It could happen that way.

MITT ROMNEY: And, as long as I continue to speak about the economy, I'm going to win.

LIASSON: But a small influential chorus of conservative voices, including the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Bill Kristol, are asking, what if he's wrong?

KRISTOL: I just worry, as someone who, you know, hopes Romney wins because I do think history suggests that, at the presidential level, it's hard to win by just playing not to lose. People want to see the path you're going to take the country on. Reagan showed them that path in 1980. Bill Clinton showed them that path in 1992, and I don't think that Mitt Romney has yet shown them that path in 2012.

ED ROGERS: By any measure, the Romney campaign is in pretty strong shape. The fact that he's even marginally ahead or marginally behind in the polls for July right now speaks for itself. Does he need more plans and more specifics? Yes, he does. Would it be better to have them and offer some fresh perspective on some of the issues, some of the things he wants to do as president? Yeah, probably so. There's no hurry right now.

LIASSON: Wait until the fall, says Rogers, when more voters are tuned in, but it remains to be seen whether the Romney campaign plans to release a bold policy agenda any time. Romney has put out a 59 point plan, but when he boils it down, it's with this flip applause line.

ROMNEY: What would you do to get the economy going? I say, well, look at what the president's done and do the opposite.

LIASSON: Political analyst Stu Rothenberg points out that both candidates are doing the wrong thing for the right reason.

STU ROTHENBERG: That is, Romney's trying to make the election a referendum on employment, unemployment and new job creation and the administration's performance, and the president, since he doesn't have a great record on jobs and the economy, which is a top issue, has to make the election about Mitt Romney. The problem is that's the way you run a campaign. That's not the way you run a country.

LIASSON: And that means whoever wins the White House won't have a mandate to tackle the long list of difficult problems that will have to be addressed after November.