It says "Not safe for work" in the headline. Should subby have abbreviated that to "NSFW" or are the 5 of you wankers above so retarded or overly sensitive about your soon to be nipped wang that you can't make the leap and translate "Not safe for work" to "NSFW" and then extrapolate it out to what it means on Fark?

That's a woefully incomplete article. I was left at the end wondering "and then...?" Simply summarizing a story virtually EVERYONE already knows and somehow that's newsworthy? There's no update on what has happened in the last decade (not that I care).

It appears that simply summarizing two-decade-old news is enough to fill a [sucky] blog.

Man, I was about 14 when that story hit, and right about the same time, we had the Buttafuoco case, the Nancy Kerrigan/Tonya Harding scandal, and the OJ Trial. I honestly believe 1993-1994 was when our news ceased to be journalism and started spiraling into a sensationalist infotainment shiatshow.

fzumrk:I think Jay Leno is still making jokes about this and Joey Buttafuoco.

Not surprising, since I think he's also still making jokes about Gerald Ford falling down a lot and Jimmy Carter being a peanut farmer. For Jay Leno, the Bobbitt and Buttafuoco stories probably qualify as "ripped from today's headlines" type stuff.

hammettman:It says "Not safe for work" in the headline. Should subby have abbreviated that to "NSFW" or are the 5 of you wankers above so retarded or overly sensitive about your soon to be nipped wang that you can't make the leap and translate "Not safe for work" to "NSFW" and then extrapolate it out to what it means on Fark?

I'm guessing that the headline was recently modified by an admin, and it didn't have a NSFW warning when those guys were complaining about it. It happens.

Cyberluddite:hammettman: It says "Not safe for work" in the headline. Should subby have abbreviated that to "NSFW" or are the 5 of you wankers above so retarded or overly sensitive about your soon to be nipped wang that you can't make the leap and translate "Not safe for work" to "NSFW" and then extrapolate it out to what it means on Fark?

I'm guessing that the headline was recently modified by an admin, and it didn't have a NSFW warning when those guys were complaining about it. It happens.

All you pussies biatching and moaning need to head over to /r/WTF or /r/spacedicks for a few hours and grow a pair!.. Then mutilate them in some fashion and upload/post for the world of reddit to see, thus spawning a fark greenlight submission completing the trifecta.

RoyHobbs22:plushpuppy: Does a picture of a severed penis require a NSFW tag?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Why? It was just the tip.

[letmeputmythoughtsinyourbrain.files.wordpress.com image 479x390]

so, the article says it was cut off at the base, so that's the whole thing..... Meaning several farkers have Mr. Bobbit beaten for penis size. Why did she complain so much? I'd say that's 3-4 inches fully erect. That's nothing compared to what some farkers claim to have in their trousers. Maybe it was because he was so small and she didn't see any other way of getting out of the marriage.