(Newser)
–
The White House and Congress are now wrangling to reconcile the five health care bills on the floors of the House and Senate, and no issue is causing greater headaches than the so-called public option. The Senate Finance Committee's bill, which has the support of Republican Olympia Snowe, doesn't have one, but the Maine senator says she favors a "trigger" that would establish a public plan on a state-by-state basis if private plans aren't affordable enough. The White House likes the idea, but liberal Dems worry about Snowe's growing clout.

President Obama had favored a government plan, as an option for the uninsured, to prompt competition. But in private he has smiled upon Snowe's idea, which would introduce public plans state by state whenever 5% or more of the population can't afford care. Harry Reid calls the trigger option "a pretty doggone good idea," but Rep. Raúl Grijalva, who's leading the push for a public option in the House, worries that "the administration has put her in the driver’s seat. It’s very disconcerting."

Right, BlueAyez. I did not think of that. That means if we are going to be protected from the insurance industry any public option has to be strictly voluntary.

Snarfeh

Oct 16, 2009 4:47 AM CDT

@dawgs - And that is exactly my point, dude....it depends on the poll. Based on all the polls I have seen, I am estimating the majority is in favor by a slight margin. In the link you cited, however, I don't think the 2 answers for which the percentages were added together are that far off from each other. It's a fine, fine line between "extremely important" and "quite important"....I would say both answers indicate the respondent was in favor of it.