You have the leftist's penchant for playing with words. Very few people are literally "pro-war". The rest of us are pro-survival. Well, actually, some people who don't want to take responsibility for their own lives are actually pro-slavery. Which would make them anti-war.

You're assuming that it's always going to be small, infrequent attacks?
'Past performance does not guarantee future performance'.
What if someone you love happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time? Your little game of Russian roulette with everyone else's lives will suddenly hit home.

You can blame a lot of that on insane rules of engagement and trying to win hearts and minds. There should be no rules beyond the Geneva conventions, and we know by now that their hearts and minds can't be won--only killed. This would be a wonderful opportunity to slaughter a lot of psychopaths, thus for a while, improving the human gene pool.

I'm a pretty good reader, but do feel free to quote Buchanan where he offers a solution beyond wringing your hands in impotence and waiting to see if and when we actually face a serious threat on American soil. Then I'm sure he'll have another brilliant idea, like adopting sharia law.

No, the ISIS videos are not targeted at those who would fight them, they're targeted to psychopaths all over the world who yearn for the opportunity to commit crimes against humanity and, not only get away with it, but also be rewarded and praised for it. They are recruitment videos. They think the US won't be incensed enough to actually invade again because they believe the propaganda they've heard that that people like you in the US are too sick and tired of war to do it. They even believe that our leaving Iraq and Afghanistan was an admission of defeat, regardless of the facts.
As far as warhawks sending their own family members to war as proving their sincerity, that's just a red herring. If they actually did, you would claim that's just further proof of their venality, and maybe even proof of their insanity.

After reading this bilge, my only conclusion would have to be to surrender.
ISIS and their allies in the countries they have invaded and will invade, without Western interference, will establish the core of their world wide caliphate. The growing populations of Muslims in western Europe will paralyze those nations into inaction, and they will fall to ISIS as well, probably without a fight. Pakistan already has nuclear weapons. A number of Western European nations have nuclear weapons, and the ability to deliver them anywhere in the world. So, obviously, as ISIS's success grows in Europe, their ability to threaten the US and other countries as yet not controlled by them will grow.
So, when do we start to resist? When ISIS controlled nuclear weaponry is trained upon the US as they demand that we surrender to them?
Buchanan wants to cut to the chase and surrender now. And you cowards agree with him.