Cain whooped ass? i must have seen a different debate. I dont think he did bad. But I hardly think he whooped ass. In fact, i thought his response to that question about a Post Cain Presidency increasing more taxes was extremely poor.

Cain whooped ass? i must have seen a different debate. I dont think he did bad. But I hardly think he whooped ass. In fact, i thought his response to that question about a Post Cain Presidency increasing more taxes was extremely poor.

Click to expand...

To me that is what I talk about when I say I don't like Cain. Sure he has catchy ideas but then what? what if he does not get what he wants?

Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.

Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.

Click to expand...

Don't talk about what you don't know about! I have challenged you to actually read about the fair tax from my signature, but as a weak minded welfare troll you refuse to do so!

Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.

Click to expand...

Don't talk about what you don't know about! I have challenged you to actually read about the fair tax from my signature, but as a weak minded welfare troll you refuse to do so!

Click to expand...

What's ironic is that it would do exactly what he wants to do: Make the rich pay more.

See the more you consume, the more you pay. It's a great incentive to be frugal.

Consumption tax. That means taxing the poor for what they eat. For the rich, that would be nothing, for the poor, it might mean the difference between a ham bone for their beans. It would hit the elderly. Course, Republicans don't really care about the poor or the elderly. So they tell us. I take them at their word.

Useful Searches

About USMessageBoard.com

USMessageBoard.com was founded in 2003 with the intent of allowing all voices to be heard. With a wildly diverse community from all sides of the political spectrum, USMessageBoard.com continues to build on that tradition. We welcome everyone despite political and/or religious beliefs, and we continue to encourage the right to free speech.

Come on in and join the discussion. Thank you for stopping by USMessageBoard.com!