The bill would direct the Food and Drug Administration to require food manufacturers to label food that contain genetically modified ingredients.

“Some in the food and chemical industry say adding this very small piece of information to food labels will confuse people, will alarm people,” Boxer said. “Well that argument is a familiar one. It’s been raised by almost every single industry when they want to avoid giving consumer basic facts about the product they’re buying.”

“When it comes to food labeling, Americans deserve a national standard that is consistent from state to state, easy to follow and does not lead to higher grocery prices,” said Claire Parker, spokeswoman of the Coalition for Safe Affordable Food.

“Unfortunately, the Boxer/DeFazio bill does not create a national labeling standard and would only serve to exacerbate the labeling conundrum by adding a federal mandate and penalties, combined with a patchwork of state laws and regulations.”

Though opponents claim a labeling rule will increase food prices for consumers, Chef Tom Colicchio said it’s not true.

“Manufacturers change food packaging all the time without an increase in food prices,” he said. “May I suggest if GMOs are as wonderful as their proponents say they are perhaps instead of spending money on lobbyists, they actually hire a few publicists to sell the public on their virtues.”

Colicchio said he’s not anti-science, but companies are using these technologies as a business model to sell farmers more herbicides.

“I don’t think Congress should shield companies or keep Americans in the dark when it comes to what we put on our tables and feed our families,” he said.

When asked what that estimated cost increase for consumers would be, DeFazio said the estimate is as much as two-thirds a cent per day.

“Tom Brady’s probably going to end up on a Wheaties box someday soon,” Colicchio said. “I guess it’s OK to change the labeling for that.”