Statement from the Candidate

In 2010 I ran an unsuccessful campaign for the United States Congress, but I'm still posting blogs that I believe express an opinion that most other people miss, and that I also believe can make America great again and cast off the yoke of liberal/progressive control that is currently in place.

Thursday, June 30, 2016

It’s the battle of the slogans: Obama is all upset and
critical of Trump for the changes The Donald wants to make to our nation in
order to “Make America Great Again”, while Obama wants to defend his desire and
promise to “fundamentally transform America”. Anyone who has an open mind at
all can determine from these two slogans who is right and who is wrong.

Obama is not only destroying our constitution by
ignoring its insistence on a separation of powers between the three branches of
government, and it’s restrictions on what each branch of government is
permitted to do, but based on the hate he obviously has for America, Obama is
intentionally limiting what our citizens have the liberty to do, and in allowing
wildly idiotic and nation-changing things to occur (like LGBT restrooms) he
demonstrates a disdain for both America and its citizens. The words of his “fundamental
transform of America” confirm that he wants us to be more like Cuba and North
Korea and wants America to be less comfortable, have fewer jobs, to become increasingly
more impoverished and for its citizens to have to depend on welfare and
big-government handouts for their sustenance.

Donald Trump has seen what Obama’s hateful words and
policies have done to America in just the seven years of Obama’s presidency and
he wants to “Make America Great Again” by rolling back Obamacare; ending Obama’s
coal industry destruction; halting the throwing of money at the solar industry
just to see the companies formed go bankrupt because they are not sustainable;
halt the emptying of Gitmo of dangerous Islamic radicals who once freed go
directly back to killing Americans and our allies in their war of terror on
civilization; and by closing our borders to prevent terrorists from entering.

If there had not been an Obama with his intention to
make America impoverished, there would likely have not been a Donald Trump who
uses plain talk describing his plan to “Make America Great Again”. So of course
Obama gets hot under the collar when he sees a serious candidate like Trump,
who we all believe will do the things he says he intends to do.

Obama was serious about “fundamentally transforming
America” and we are much worse off for it. We can only hope and pray that Trump
is being truthful with his expression of the things he wants to do, and those
of us who realize the precarious condition of the United States hope he will be
able to reverse Obama’s “transformation” and get America back on its unique and
successful constitutional path once again. And Lying Hillary must necessarily
be defeated in November.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Who but the most complete, cold-blooded and brazen
fool and political hack, could rewrite history to the extent of mentioning
Donald Trump in relation to an event in which he had no part at all, and was
not even in politics at the time?

Democrats, that’s who.

In the Democrat version of the House Benghazi attack
in which four Americans were killed on Hillary’s and Obama’s watch, Trump was
mentioned 23 times. For those of us with common sense who wondered where the President
of the United States was during this attack, and who wondered why Hillary had
repeatedly denied adequate security for the Benghazi staff, and who wondered
why the American military was not immediately dispatched to Benghazi to give
assistance to the Americans under military attack there, the inclusion in the
Democrat report on this event of references to Donald Trump seems to me to be a
definite indicator of how frightened Democrats are of the terrible role Hillary
played in the event and how exposed to criticism she is for doing nothing to
save the Americans, and then lying about the You Tube video while four dead
bodies were being brought back to the States for burial.

This whole thing stinks of totalitarian rule and
covering up evidence that would convict the rulers of the government for their
bad behavior and incompetence. It’s a
common theme in such cases that the cover-up following the crime is where
perpetrators of crimes are often caught and punished. Hillary should be cast
out on the street in shame for her terrible decisions, and Obama should be
impeached for being AWOL while his nation was at war and Americans were being
killed.

If Hillary is elected president we will see more of
this type of scandal and many more Americans will be at risk of death at the
hands of her Democrat administration. The woman doesn’t know what the truth
looks like and lies so often and about so much that even she has come to
believe her lies.

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Lady Hillary has had a good time and gotten some
laughs at Donald Trump’s expense (one of her better lines was that Donald Trump
has written several books, but all of them end with chapter 11) but no one ever
became a billionaire by filing for bankruptcy. Donald Trump has had some
financial woes, but most of his real estate efforts have been well run and have
been successful, unlike Hillary’s get-rich-quick schemes like Cattle Futures
and the White Water real estate deal that became a bust while hurting people
who invested in their little scheme.

The Clintons are nothing but low-life, wanna be money
grubbers who won’t make the effort, nor are they smart enough nor patient enough,
to build a legitimate, successful business as Trump has done. Instead they’ve
become wealthy by trading on the Clinton political name, making outrageously
costly speeches, charging a fortune for each one, and trading government access
in exchange for donations to their “charity” that is supposed to help the needy. But only
the Clintons have sufficient “need” to make any real money on the funds given
by the rich and powerful around the world who donate to the “charity”,
doubtless in the anticipation of what these foreign donors will get in exchange
after Hillary becomes president. We must all pray that the next occupant of the
Oval Office is not named Clinton.

Monday, June 27, 2016

Last week the press got their knickers in a twist
because Trump was in Scotland at the time of the Brexit vote, so the press took
this occasion to criticize Trump for being, well, Trump, with his unique ability
to be in the right place at the right time. Then after commenting way too often
about where Trump was and what he did and said, the liberal press takes the next
opportunity to again report on and criticize the quantity of reports that were
generated, by their own reporters, by and about Trump the previous week, and
they pretended anger, at this point, at Trump for all of their own reports. And,
of course, all of the repeated reporting was critical of where Trump was, what
he did, how he did it and what he said. If this isn’t self-generating news
coverage that finds a way to take a conservative candidate to task about every
simple event that occurs during the day, I don’t know what it is.

Meanwhile, Hillary remains under overlapping FBI
investigations; one of her staff assistants took the fifth more than 125 times
during questioning; State Department staff diplomats publically scold Obama
concerning his foreign policy failures in Syria; and Obama gets a slap in the
face from Britons for his Brexit remarks a week prior to the vote on that issue,
but the news is all about Trump and his supposed negative, misjudged actions
and remarks the previous week, while liberal policies, failures and scandals,
that are actually hurting people and families on a daily basis, go unreported
to any serious, responsible, depth.

How can a free nation, one that depends on an honest
reporting of the news to keep its citizens informed, continue to exist with
dishonest reporting like this? There is no possibility that the liberal press
is not in Obama’s and Hillary’s corner, and they must also desire a “fundamental
transformation of America” just as Obama does. And liberals thereby escape any
negative reporting in the news.

Sunday, June 26, 2016

Recently our fool president poked fun at Donald Trump
by insultingly informing the American citizens that being president is a hard
job and requires knowledge and stability of character to do it properly (and,
of course, this statement follows a series of selfie photos that showed our
dignified president assuming numerous ridiculous poses and stances, and follows
several appearances with late-night comedy shows and between two ferns where
our president talks some trash and spreads some lies), which of course reconfirms
our pride in our dignified leader and the respect America has enjoyed the
world-over with the America-hating Obama in office.

Then last week we learned of a rather severe,
embarrassing slap delivered to Obama, when top ranking diplomats from the State
Department sent a unified message to Obama informing him that his Syria policy
is a disaster and must be changed quickly in order to limit the carnage being
visited on the people of Syria. One wonders if our dunce president thinks the
career diplomats have an understanding of the importance of the things of which
they speak and if they have sufficient knowledge, dignity and maturity to know
what they’re talking about.

Assuming Obama ever gave any real thought to Syrian
policy in the first place, will he have the courage to take the diplomats’
advice and re-think his policy stance and perhaps follow their strong advice to
make a change? I doubt it. One just does not counter the decisions of Obama,
because his decisions are intended to “fundamentally transform America” and
nothing short of this goal will be allowed. This policy of not re-thinking
failing policy is firmly adhered to by Obama in his opinion that a gun, not a
person, killed the partiers in Orlando, and that if guns were made off-limits
to law-abiding citizens the massacre in Orlando could not have happened, even
though criminals who would commit murder would not hesitate a minute to steal a
gun or otherwise obtain one illegally, in order to inflict the murderous
injuries intended. That’s why we call them criminals, and that’s why the stupid
left is so wrong to try to take the right to possess a weapon away from
Americans. The old saying is more true today than it was when it was originally
coined: if guns are criminalized, only criminals will have guns.

Friday, June 24, 2016

The chumps who formerly were so proud of their allies
in the Occupy movement, in other words, the liberal/progressive Democrats, are
taking their idiocy to laughable ends by now occupying Congress.

The liberals were all upset about not getting their
way and being blocked from attempts to undermine the Constitutional provision
about citizens being able to keep and possess fire arms, so they went on a
pissy-rant and sat down on the floor of the House of Representatives. This is
not too surprising, as the trash and dirt will nearly always end up on the
floor sooner or later and have to be swept away. I just hope they didn’t get
the floor dirty while occupying it.

And the liberal press had not a word to say about this
limited shut-down of government, unlike the treatment the Republicans receive
when they take a principled stance on anything. The main stream press always
depicts Republicans as hurting the children, the poor and the homeless by
halting governmental functions, but when the Dems bring the House functions to
a halt, this blocking of the “peoples’ business” is fine with the press.

The nation has left the liberal/progressives behind
and they have no idea where to turn next. But do expect more demonstrations and
increasing levels of violent activity from them and their hired guns as their
influence wanes and they get increasingly frustrated. And one should be extra
watchful of Obama, because he sees his “fundamental transformation of America”
turning to dust as the nation prepares to fundamentally transform Obamacare and
Barry’s open borders immigration policies. The left’s Brown Shirts that have
caused violence at some Trump rallies are still with us, and we need to be
ready when the left fully releases them to halt the new direction of the United
States.

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

It’s not demoralizing enough that Obama’s own staff has
repeatedly given honest, realistic and discouraging assessments of how the
Obama administration is losing our fight with ISIS and related terrorist groups
and individuals, which assessments are one-hundred-eighty degrees out of phase
from the lying, dreamy, pleasant descriptions that Obama himself gives of how he
has dealt with this very serious issue and how we are supposedly winning against
our enemies. But now we have evidence, from the mouth of Obama’s Attorney
General, Loretta Lynch, that we will use dope-smoking, hippy thinking to defeat
the enemy that has sworn to kill us. She says that the way to ward off more
Orlando-style terrorist attacks is to use “compassion, unity and love”. No
dope-smoker could have stated Obama-reality better.

How nuts must someone be to suggest that the way to
defeat terrorism and make America and the world safe is to exercise “compassion,
unity and love”? This type of statement is a slap in the face of the victims of
the Orlando attack, to suggest that we haven’t been nice enough and to place blame
for this failing on the part of the people who were simply enjoying themselves
in the Orlando night club until an Islamic hate monger killed them. What the
hell kind of people are the fools in the Obama administration?

So let’s see how the Attorney General’s plan would
work: Instead of using technology and proven police work to halt crimes and gather
evidence to convict law breakers, are we now going to depend on love and the
chanting of mantras to stop them? This would suggest that prior to Orlando we
were not “loving” enough, but now we are suddenly awash with love and no more
crimes will be committed? So why was the Obama administration lacking in love
until just now? Oh, I remember: he has
been too busy “fundamentally transforming America” to be loving. He was
spending all of his time undermining the nation’s economy and dividing the population
along economic, sexual identity and racial lines, but now he’s ready to feel
the love. Yeah, right.

Can the American people soon expect that counterfeiters,
bank robbers and kidnappers will be encouraged to halt their illegal ways via
compassion and love instead of being finger printed and DNA tested? Will Obama
demand that the fence and the walls surrounding the White House be taken down
due to his new-found love and compassion as a means to ward off evil and
discourage bad guys?

One phrase that Ms. Lynch did not use in addition to
the newly concocted words of compassion, unity and love that will solve all of
the nation’s problems, was “turn the other cheek”. But we can’t use that phrase
because it sounds too Christian, and we can’t have these crazy Christians
running around verbally “attacking” everyone with Bibles, crucifixes and words
of love. No, it’s better to quote a nut-job like John Lennon rather than
Christ. The old 1960s songs “All we need is love” and “What the world needs now
is love sweet love” come to mind with Lynch’s idiotic statements. But the
Attorney General’s naïve, superior attitude is not encouraging.

I assume we’ll now have the IRS using love to convince
conservatives not to try to get tax exemption for their groups to compete with liberal
Democrats, instead of using the threat of imprisonment and fines to keep them
out of the game of politics. And maybe Lois Lerner can be brought back to lead
the IRS in this new direction, but she never appeared to be much of a “love”
person to me.

Poor Loretta Lynch. Last week she was forced to state
the policy of redacting any hateful Islamic language and phrasing found in the
transcript recently released of the words used by the Orlando killer as he was
attacking the night club. But the outcry to this stupidity was so great that
the government soon released the entire screed. Then she is forced to claim to
be using passive, non-violent, Gandhi-like thinking to halt crime. I believe
that it’s obvious at this point: we have a dangerous, anti-American bunch of fools
in the White House, and we’re in deep trouble if we don’t get them out of there
real soon.

And of course Ms. Lynch added insult to injury when
she vacuously stated that we may never know the motivation of the Orlando
killer. Sadly, everyone except Lynch and
Obama know exactly what the motivation was: jihad and the killing of Americans.
The words spoken by the killer proved his love for ISIS and his desire to
eliminate America as an influence in the world.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Americans are watching the intentional destruction of
their nation, destruction that is directed by Barack Obama and being passively allowed
to proceed by Republicans in the House and Senate.

We have learned that the FBI, in each of their
investigations of terrorist killings, has been called off of any investigation
of Islamic persons of interest by Obama, because he has unilaterally decided
that Islam is a religion of peace and no investigation is necessary of anyone practicing
that religion. This decision not to investigate (under the little-known Countering
Violent Extremism law) resembles his murderous rules of engagement that
soldiers must follow when in battle zones, which places our military personnel
in mortal danger, rather than the enemy being in any danger from American
forces.

To demonstrate how out-of-touch our president is in
this critical game that is destroying America, on Thursday of last week, John
Brennan, the Director of the CIA, told us how dangerous, strong and wide-spread
ISIS is and how threatened the world has
become with terrorists living within our borders and attacking citizens at
will, all of which warnings were the exact opposite of the pretty picture that
Obama painted a few days earlier about ISIS being weakened and on the run, and
terrorists being fearful of showing their faces in the presence of the determined,
severe Obama administration. This idiotic statement of Obama’s is similar to
the self-congratulatory speech he delivered just one day before the massive terrorist
attack on Paris last November, in which our clueless president informed the
nation and the world that ISIS had been “contained” under his wise leadership. Obama is, and will
always be, a fool and a liar, and he is the most dangerous force in America
today, and that danger is pointed directly at Main Street, USA.

Monday, June 20, 2016

When one reflects on the last seven years it is quite
impressive how public opinion on all things Obama has shifted from his being
thought a be a hero, to everyone now realizing that he is a thoughtless fool
with no idea what he’s doing in the Oval Office. Oh, sure, the press still
fawns over him, but that’s the job of
the leftist press and they will do it regardless of what a failure Obama has
been in terms of assuring safe borders and the protection of the constitutional
rights of all citizens. He has been extraordinarily successful in the only area
he considers important: He has “fundamentally transformed America”, or at least
fundamentally pointed America in a direction meant to destroy it.

Several years ago, I believe it was the prolific
author Thomas Sowell, who commented on the slow but certain leftward drift of
American politics. He was at the time in his sixties and believed he would be
dead before America could drift to total destruction. But that was before
Obama. Barack Obama pushed the pedal to the metal and has caused so much chaos,
confusion and division in our nation in just seven years that the end seems
very near indeed.

But Obama’s sudden jolt to the left and to
totalitarianism may have been a mistake for those who, like him, hate America
and encouraged this redirection. After all, with the coming of Obama, we did
get the Tea Parties and their allies suddenly activated and involved in
politics; we did get a candidate in Donald Trump to state politically incorrect
things that most loyal and patriotic Americans were either afraid to say or felt
they would be helpless to stop the intentional destruction of all they held
dear. And we have seen the rejection by the public of the old Republican
establishment who seemed to compete with leftist Democrats to see who could
move the nation left the quickest.

On top of everything else, Obama’s seeming hand-picked
candidate to succeed him in the presidency has been a complete and total failure
considering her leftist lurch to try to out-do the socialist Bernie Sanders;
her email scandal; her lies about the deaths in Benghazi; her terrible record of
non-accomplishments as Secretary of State; and the revelations of her and Bill’s
past scandals which the left believed were safely buried, but have been unearthed
for a new generation to see and consider.

Of course it’s true that there is pressure from all
sides to dump Trump and get the Republican party back on track again in order to
protect the careers of the professional politicians who, like Harry Reid have
become multi-millionaires on a comparatively Spartan Senate salary, and occupy elected
positions which many politicians eventually leave to join the influence-buying
and peddling pressure groups on Washington’s K Street, where some real money
can be made if one will only play the game and serve the corporate and
big-government ends of getting the votes that will serve the lobbyists.

Obama made a big mistake by turning his back on the
United States constitution and the laws of our nation. He awakened the so-called
Sleeping Giant hiding just under the surface of America’s comfortable and
contented majority, and they are pissed!

There is no doubt that there are things that have been
done by Obama that will plague the nation forever (illegal immigration;
healthcare uncertainty; bad schools;
racial divide; an influx of terrorist “refugees”
who intend us only ill; a debt that’s likely to be unrepayable) but if true
patriotic Americans are elected to the House, Senate and the White House this
year, the nation will survive once again, and maybe, to borrow from and
slightly modify Donald Trump’s slogan, just maybe, we can “Make America, America
Again”. At the very least, Obama has made us long for the good ole days prior
to his arrival, and that’s a wake-up call and a good start.

Thursday, June 16, 2016

Liberals seem to have trouble keeping their eyes on
the ball. The common denominator between 911 (where no guns were used) and
Orlando (where guns were used) was not
the use of guns, but rather the intent of radical, hate-filled religious
fanatics to kill westerners in general and Americans in particular.

Liberals are so reflexively and narrow-mindedly anti-gun-oriented
that they place themselves and the nation at risk by not recognizing that guns
can prevent terrorists from murdering at will and at random if good people
possess them.

Particularly frightening was to see our president, the
one person who should be re-evaluating how
Orlando happened, not the method of killing used, and trying to improve
security to be sure no future terrorists can use any killing method to murder
again, belaboring us with his by-now patented rant against guns. Instead of
real-world solutions we have to listen to a sweating, defensive Obama blaming
an inanimate object for how it’s used in a demented human’s hands. Obama thinks
he’s assured himself a legacy with his abortive Obamacare and his near-criminal,
lying nuke deal with Iran, but he’ll always be remembered for not thinking
clearly and improving security procedures to halt the killing of Americans
while he lectures an opposition political candidate and a harmless gun-owner’s
group for the acts committed by a religious hate-filled monster. The rant Obama
committed a few days ago, in the shadow of the greatest mass murder attack in
American history, showed us a small, simple-thinking man who cannot rid himself
of his prejudices and think clearly about the future. His only solution to prevent
terrorists using aircraft and bombs to kill masses of people is to ban guns,
and this plan will not work and is on the face of it, stupid.

The gun that killed in Orlando was in the killer’s
hands the day before the killings, and it didn’t hurt a soul until the killer
picked it up and pulled the trigger. The gun was just the method used, among
many methods available, to kill on this occasion. Tomorrow the method may well
be bombs and grenades, but Obama will not take any step to protect Americans
that does not include the further undermining of our constitution by this simple
man, who announced his evil intentions toward our nation with his plan to ”fundamentally transform
America”, and depriving Americans of their right to possess fire
arms is one of the desired means to achieve this transformation.

Our nation is at great risk if our leaders can’t
determine reality from their preferred fantasy and properly respond to the
Islamic terrorist threat against our nation and our way of life.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Yesterday we witnessed the breakdown of Barack Obama
as he made an inflamed speech in an attempt to defend his inattention to
America’s terrorist threat from his beloved Islam, a speech he delivered in the
back-wash of the Orlando nightclub massacre and criticism he is receiving from
all corners for his inability to attack and defeat the people who are killing
Americans and other citizens around the world. The LGBT crowd seems to be
getting that message, and one hears that they are showing more favorable support
for Donald Trump since the Orlando attack because he has the courage and resolve
to propose measures that will try to identity and stop the people who have
threatened to kill Americans and end our way of life, as opposed to Obama who
to this day continues his PC nonsense and will not be the strong leader we need
in a time of war, which this definitely is, and will not take measures needed
to prevent the gay-hating Islamic terrorists from killing gay Americans.

If Obama were able to concentrate his attention as
much on halting terrorist Islamic murderers as he does with his attempts to unconstitutionally
take self-defense weapons from Americans, the nation and the world would be
much better off and safer. But when a president enters office swearing to want
to “fundamentally transform America”, and when he has expressed a love for
Islam’s morning call to prayer, while also demonstrating his disregard for the
American constitution and the hated “guns and religion” tendencies of the
American population’s bitter clingers, what can you expect?

So our Barry is more out-spoken and displays more
antipathy toward Donald Trump than he does toward the terrorist murderer in
Orlando.

A few weeks ago our beloved ruler shot off his mouth
and involved himself in British and European politics when he expressed the pontifical,
know-it-all opinion that England would be badly hurt if they voted to leave the
European Union, and then our fool president slipped in a threat that if they voted
to separate themselves from the EU, American money and support for England
would dry up. Obama is nothing if he’s not a smooth talker when addressing our
allies.

The problem with Obama’s intrusion in England’s
internal politics, and forgetting his long antipathy toward England, is that
the man maintains a collectivist, socialist attitude and he’s always wrong. Of
course he likes the European Union, because it behaves like a dictator and tries
to control the internal politics and economic decisions of all member-states of
the EU, much like Obama’s disastrous, dictatorial ruling style as president of
the US.

In order to better judge the accuracy of Obama’s
decisions and to gain a better view of his advice to Britons to vote against
exiting the European Union, let’s review some of his major decisions while America’s
president and see if we can glean some insight to his success rate:

Obama was wrong to force government healthcare on all
Americans; he’s wrong about allowing untold numbers of illegal aliens to cross
our borders and enter the United States, illegally, every day; he’s wrong about
the LGBT restroom edict; he’s wrong about forcing welfare housing on middle
class neighborhoods; he’s wrong about denying Americans the constitutional
right to possess weapons for their own defense; he’s wrong about the cause and
commission of radical Islamic terror attacks around the world; he was wrong to unilaterally
withdraw troops from Iraq when he did; he was wrong to sign the Nuke agreement
with Iran; he’s wrong to allow the influx of Syrian “refugees” into America despite
the warning from the FBI that they cannot be properly vetted and despite the
fact that ISIS said they would infiltrate the “refugees” with terrorists; he
was wrong to re-establish diplomatic relations with a still-communist Cuba; he
was wrong about the Arab Spring and the advisability of becoming pals with the
Muslim Brotherhood as Egypt collapsed; he was wrong and lying about the cause
of the attack on our diplomatic compound in Benghazi; he was wrong about
establishing the Fast and Furious scheme to influence the ownership of weapons
on Americans in contradiction to the second amendment of our constitution; he
was wrong about the stimulus that was supposed to assure a quick recovery
following the real estate and economic collapse at the beginning of his
administration; he is wrong to continue to increase the debt of the United
States beyond what can possibly be repaid; he’s been wrong to disregard duly
passed laws and any restraint the constitution places on his actions and
decisions; he’s been wrong to allow the EPA to continue to issue ill-advised
regulations that have slowed business growth to a trickle; he’s wrong, and his
administration is lying, about the true state of unemployment in America; and
he has been dangerously wrong to not completely annihilate ISIS instead of
conducting his repeated, insincere, largely ineffective and mostly wasteful,
bombing runs on Syria.

I think one can
see a trend developing here. But how can a president not be wrong when his
philosophy for governing is to “fundamentally transform America”?

In short, the man is wrong every time he opens his
mouth or makes a policy decision, and he’s wrong about the advisability of
England exiting the European Union. Here’s how one can accurately make decisions
about almost anything: listen to Obama and then do the exact opposite.

Monday, June 13, 2016

How can the left pretend that they support things that
will make America even more successful and wealthy, and make a majority of its
citizens more comfortable, when they repeatedly and constantly refer to meaningless
identity political subjects, such as being the first woman presidential
candidate, or the first black president? These are historical points to consider,
but what value to any American can possibly come from the first black president
when he states that his primary goal is to “fundamentally transform America”,
and then successfully sets about to accomplish his stated goal by doing things
that amount to causing the destruction of all things that made America great?

LGBT restrooms are not an issue springing from any
evidence that the LGBT population in America was being discriminated against
nor deprived of facilities to fulfill normal bodily functions. In fact, the
whole push from Washington to allow men into women’s restrooms was without even
the pretense of there being any discrimination; it was all about “identity”
politics. It was simply an order from Obama that we must obey. A vast majority
of Americans have no favorable opinion in the LGBT restroom edict, but it’s all
Washington and the liberal press can discuss, and it has caused the Obama
administration to threaten to withhold education funds from any state that
refuses to implement this idiotic “identity” scheme.

Additionally, we have thousands of illegal aliens crossing
our borders every day and we have no idea who they are nor where they’re being
settled, but Obama is hell bent on allowing perverted men into the lady’s loo.
We need a president who will stop trying to bend our nation to his desired
vision of what we should be, and let Americans live their own lives in their
own ways. Obama basks in the glory of a false legacy for allowing illegals to cross
our borders and for allowing LGBT people to enter inappropriate restrooms, but
does nothing to stop a murdering terrorist from gunning down people in a bar in
Orlando. The man has his priorities in all the wrong places.

Gay marriage is a wholly created issue that a majority
of Americans have never shown any interest in promoting because marriage is not
defined as being between two people of the same sex. Marriage has evolved over
thousands of years as being the best way to raise a family. But Identity
politics and a radical leftist attitude from Obama, who formerly opposed gay
marriage in order to get re-elected, by the way, has made this appear to be the
most important and urgent issue America faces, while millions of Americans are
forced to accept welfare because they can’t find a job in the Obama/Biden economy
with its job-killing edicts and its torrent of regulations.

Healthcare for the poor was a relatively non-issue
(anyone in America, poor, citizen or non-citizen could go into any hospital and
get medical assistance immediately at any time) until Obama found it to be a
means to his “fundamental transformation of America”, at which time the
Democrats lied daily about citizens being able to keep their plans and their
doctors, forced a legislative vote without allowing proper time for the legislators
to read the bill, and we ended up with this horrible law that denies people the
healthcare insurance they want and has premiums and deductibles that in effect
create a situation where even those with coverage under Obamacare cannot afford
to use the coverage they’re forced to buy.

Under Obama only illegal immigration is considered
good immigration. In a recent Hollywood video, created at the urging of the
Obama administration, we saw numerous celebrities telling us how valuable
immigrants are and what good people they are and how hard they work, when the
subject that is dividing our nation is not immigration itself, but rather illegal
immigration and how destructive these people are and how dangerous they have
made America as they too often commit their second and third illegal acts: the
first act being the breaking of our laws by entering illegally.

We’ve heard reports of boys, who claim to identify as
girls, becoming track champions after joining a high school girls’ track team.
So who, indeed, has come a long way, baby? Girls who work hard to train for a
sport are being beaten by boys who joined their team, and this serves the girls
in what way? I see evidence here of an Obama War on Women.

The vast majority of Americans know our nation is NOT
winning the war with ISIS; NOT protecting our borders from illegal entry; NOT
creating jobs for the massive number of unemployed Americans; NOT allowing
choice in where we get healthcare and NOT allowing competition that would lower
the cost of coverage; NOT making any attempt to keep Iran from getting a nuclear
weapon. But we do see an action front from government to force aberrant
behavior into our faces and down our throats. Obama really has “fundamentally transformed
America”, and we don’t appreciate it.

Friday, June 10, 2016

In the 2010 mid-term election Democrats went on an
insane tear as they prepared to “deem” that Obamacare was law, without taking a
vote on the issue, justifying this illegal and unconstitutional proposal
because of its importance and pressing need. Fortunately they decided to take a
vote and the Affordable Care Act became law the constitutional way, not by
edict. But the attempt to subvert law, custom and tradition by Democrats was
off to a good start and is reaching fruition these 6 years later with the
liberal’s push to get their ideas shoved down the nation’s throat by
introducing us to the identity politics of sexual orientation, in which men can
enter a women’s restroom because he “identifies” as a woman, or “deems” himself
to be a woman, at least on the day and at the time he enters the wrong restroom.

Taking this fantasy attitude a little further down the
road to societal destruction, in recent months liberals have decided to “deem”
conservatives who deny that climate change/global warming exists to be
criminals and they have put forth the warning that change/warming deniers
should be prosecuted for their disbelief in the lie of warming/change. In this
regard they are taking up the banner of Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union’s
tendency to silence anyone, via jailing or summary execution, for not obeying
the ruler’s edicts, with the logic that all Soviet orders were correct and just.
So anyone who denied, criticized or disobeyed them was “deemed” to be insane
and had to be eliminated before the insanity of disbelief were to spread to the
general population. Where does this dictatorial thinking end? I fear it doesn’t
end. This threat of prosecution for holding an opinion that is contrary to the
ruling party’s official line is terrorism, pure and simple, and is intended to
silence the critics of the Obama administration.

Once a political party or a society place themselves
above the law, or make themselves and their pronouncements into the law, terror
reigns and all fairness and sanity disappear.

With the current identity politics of Obama and the
Democrats, we are one small step nearer to “deeming” that illegal aliens are indeed
American citizens because they “identify” with America, and because they are
here and want to vote for Obama’s wonderful Democrat candidates so as to assure
the Democrat continued, sensible but totalitarian ruling power.

With all of the facts that have been exposed about Hillary’s
illegal personal email server and that her mishandling of sensitive and secure
emails broke the law as it applies to all Americans except her, I have no doubt
that Obama will “deem” her to be innocent because she is a liberal candidate
and meant no harm. This would, of course, undermine any pretense of national
security and a rule of law, but that’s what liberals/progressives do, at least
under the unlawful and unconstitutional Obama administration.

And has the dominant liberal press and electronic media,
whose Constitutional responsibility it is to inform the public of events and
facts important to their lives, alerted us to the danger involved in liberal
lawlessness? No, they have not. But this silence is in keeping with Obama’s and
the liberals’ ”deeming” that legal and constitutional restrictions on their
actions don’t exist and should be ignored because their actions must be allowed
to take precedence over any old-fashioned attitudes of legality and tradition.

Also consider that in the last few days, liberal
violence against Trump supporters is blamed on Donald Trump and not the violent
perps who were hired by the left to disrupt Trump’s peaceful gatherings. And of
course the liberal press is blaming Trump’s spoken words, not the left’s
violent acts, for the problem. Trump’s words are “deemed” to have caused the
justified violent actions that injured people and damaged private property. This
reversal of blame for violence is typical of liberal blame transference to
their opponents.

Obama long ago promised to “fundamentally transform America”
and he has been successful in achieving this goal. But these final few months
of the Obama presidency will prove to be incredibly violent and dangerous for
the future existence of America, and he and his party’s surge of illegality and
inappropriate behavior must be opposed. When the president of the United States
actually states that his allies should bring a gun to a knife fight, we know we
have a dangerous struggle ahead of us.

The name-calling and identity politics that passes for
truth and reason in the Democrat Party is not only directed at competitors
outside the Party. Recently a Hillary supporter called Bernie Sanders a sexist
because he would not drop out of the race for the Democrat candidacy for
president. So much for traditional campaigning in an effort to persuade the
public that your candidate is the better one and that his/her ideas are the
best ideas. Now the Democrat establishment candidate (Hillary) is calling the
Democrat anti-establishment candidate (Bernie) the same names that they typically
reserved for Republicans.

Using the edgy logic that Democrats are known for,
couldn’t Hillary be called an age-ist for wanting the 74 year old Sanders out
of the race, and why isn’t she called anti-Jewish for denying the Jewish Sanders
the historic event of being the first Jewish presidential candidate?

I guess liberals think historical precedent is of
value only when they choose to relate politics to race and sex, but not when
religion or age are the topics. Actually, when considered historically, the 40
years that the Israelites wandered aimlessly in the wilderness is a larger
point to consider than the race or sex of otherwise wealthy, comfortable people
like Obama or Hillary. Our Bernie overcame the trials of his forebears and is
still active in the game. Maybe he should be the Democrat standard-bearer and
not the spoiled, political opportunist, Hillary, who is being investigated by
the FBI for multiple legal issues.

Thursday, June 9, 2016

Republicans, who have been repeatedly accused by
Democrats of waging a War on Women, got a reprieve of sorts recently when a
Hillary supporter accused Bernie Sanders of being a sexist because he will not
drop out of the Democrat primary race and give the candidacy to Hillary, and
they wanted this act of self-immolation from Bernie even before all of the
voting was over. This habit of liberals of always accusing their political
opponents of sexism, racism, of just plain hate, is now being directed to one
of their own number, and it feels good to have the words directed at someone
other than a Republican or a conservative for a change.

This idiotic tactic of liberal politicians calling
their opponents nasty names and accusing them of one “ism” or another instead
of debating the issues, is laying the groundwork for there eventually being no opposition
candidate permitted if a woman, or a minority, or an LGBT or anyone except a White,
Male Conservative, wants an elected position, which is itself a sexist position
for liberals to cause to happen. This is an extension of the blatant racism
that got Obama elected twice and has prevented the Republicans in Congress from
denying him funding for his scandalous schemes to “fundamentally transform
America” and has kept the cowardly Republicans from impeaching this lawless
president out of fear of being called nasty names by leftists.

The extreme, illogical positions that liberals are
taking during this era of Trump demonstrates how precariously their power is
perched and how fearful they are of their own downfall in the upcoming election.

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Liberal/Progressive/Democrats are the ultimate “never-Trump”
advocates, with principled Conservatives/Republicans coming up far to the rear
of that group in number and voting clout.

Conservatives/Republicans had better understand this
fact or they will wake up on November 9th to discover that Obama’s
third term place-filler has been elected to office for the next four years, and
this bunch of America-hating radical fools, whether Hillary, Bernie, dumb ole
Joe Biden or Pocahontas, having observed Obama’s successful, dictatorial style for
eight years, and having had a good lesson demonstrating how weak House and
Senate Republicans are and how easy it is for a president to disobey the
constitution and the laws of the nation and rule by executive order, will be loaded for bear and will quickly complete
Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America”.

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

The Donald Trump campaign has been a phenomenon never
before seen in American politics. No matter what he says or does and no matter
what the smart set in Washington and New York say about him, and the negative
predictions they make regarding his political future, he just keeps winning and
gaining supporters. So, given his personal success in this presidential
campaign, can he take credit for the following things that indicate the
Democrat party is falling apart?

:

Elk Hart, Indiana: Obama stammers like a drunken myna
bird throughout his non-speech in an attempt to blame Trump’s ideas for the
injury Obama’s leftist policies have actually caused this great nation.

Katie Couric produces a concocted video lie about
second amendment defenders, then gets caught in the lie and apologizes for it!

Hillary is being opposed by even Susan Sarandon for
the lies she tells.

Doug Schoen predicts that Hillary will lose in the
presidential election.

Bill Clinton’s past women troubles are being exposed
(no pun intended) to a new generation of voters, and the new voters don’t like
what they see.

Obamacare is failing badly, everywhere it’s tried.

We now know that the justification for dealing with
Iran “moderates” on the nuke deal was all lies coming straight out of the White
House.

Trump takes the liberal press to school in a “sleaze”
lecture session and liberal cable channels run the video of it.

The socialism and anti-capitalism of the Democrat
party is now in the open for all to see.

The various Clinton scandals are now being discussed
more openly than they ever were prior to Hillary’s run for president.

The demonizing of police departments by the Obama Department
of Justice is causing an increase in crime across America, and everyone knows
it.

The violent anti-Trump demonstrations are backfiring
on the Democrats who are funding and organizing them.

Predictions that the seventeen or so Republican
presidential candidates beating up on each other during the primary campaign
would destroy the Republican Party have been found to be premature, when
actually the competition between Bernie and Hillary to see who can run the
swiftest to the left and promise the most goodies to the greatest number of
voters is taking the Democrat Party down hard.

I know that not all of the above bits of evidence that
leftists are falling apart can be attributed to Donald Trump, but certainly some
of them can be, and all of them have occurred during Trump’s tenure as the assumed
head of the Republican Party, so I’ll give him credit for the entire package anyway.

Monday, June 6, 2016

Last week Barack Obama made a speech in Elkhart,
Indiana, that was supposed to be a renunciation of Donald Trump and his
announced policies should he become president, but it turned into a stammering
fest as Obama got stuck on his words and repeated them so many times that he
sounded like an old 45 RPM record that got stuck in a defective groove. It
would appear that Donald Trump has the liberal establishment so shook up and
fearful that their Hate America First effort
is crumbling and coming down on their heads.

Obama was, of course, preaching to the faithful
(whether he was addressing the Islamic faithful or the liberal Democrat
faithful I’m not sure) and vaguely denounced Trump for his future plans. But
the problem with all of Obama’s complaints about Trump is that the subjects Obama
selects to criticize are the very things that Obama himself has actually concentrated
on and undermined or destroyed as president: social and racial division;
elevated national unemployment rate; illegal immigration; illegal punishment of
his political opponents; increased poverty levels; over-regulation that causes
businesses to either shut down or have to lay employees off; increased welfare
roles; illegal and unconstitutional acts from the Oval Office, etc.

As Obama just kept repeating the same word, “If, If,
If, If…” for such a long time I was concerned that the man had gone mental
(well, he is mental, but this was different).

Friday, June 3, 2016

Ever wonder how liberals, who generally are prosperous
and live well under capitalism, can possibly want to introduce the proven
failure of socialism and Marxism into our society?

Have you ever heard Obama speak with absolute and
complete sincerity of the “success” of his terribly failed and divisive administration?

How many times have you heard members of the Obama
White House proudly state that they, via the misnamed Affordable Care Act, have
provided healthcare to a needy nation?

And I’m sure everyone has heard “Crazy” Bernie Sanders
say that he will provide free college education to all citizens, and heard “Lying”
Hillary say that her only goal is “working for you”, and I assume that her
words mean that she is going to “work” for the 300 million Americans who have
built the most wealthy nation in the world, in her belief that they are too
stupid and too lazy to work for themselves and their families and continue the unprecedented
prosperity they attained, without government interference in their personal
lives.

In spite of all the evidence to the contrary liberals
seem to really believe that their policies are good and will serve the general
welfare of all Americans. These people really believe the crap they spew. But
they don’t realize that just passing a law that sounds good doesn’t make it good,
and that sometimes the law has to be revised or completely eliminated if it
doesn’t do the good things it was intended to do. Obamacare is now the law and
it doesn’t matter at all to Obama and his liberals the many American citizens
who have reported that they can no longer afford healthcare under the ACA, with
its high deductibles and high premiums. They will continue to shove this
abortive legislation down our throats, against our will. Big-government
advocates will never allow common sense solutions stand in the way of their
convoluted and corrupt takeover and control of our lives.

With global warming/climate change, it doesn’t matter
how unseasonably cool it gets nor how many of the leftist’s dire predictions
are proven wrong, these people firmly cling to their off-the-wall predictions
of environmental catastrophe. And since evidence of any warming on a global
scale is lacking, the liberals try to convince the ignorant population of its
existence by telling us that many scientists “believe” in the warming/change
lies. But they forget to mention that many other scientists believe warming is
not happening. But beyond the belief systems of scientists, we need scientific
proof that warming/change is occurring, and there is no such proof aside from
the computer modeling the leftists consider to be proof, and the modeling is
only providing the outcome that the computer software people input to the
system, which offers no proof at all.

It’s as though liberals are unable to evaluate evidence
that’s right in front of them. Once they’ve decided on a course of action there’s
no deviating from the faulty, injurious ideas regardless of the disastrous
outcomes and unintended consequences.

It’s easy and logical to lump warming supporters into
a category of self-serving ideologues who are worried about losing their
lucrative government contracts to study the environment, but there’s something
more basic than simply serving their own self-interest, and that’s serving the
continued freedom and prosperity of the American people, and they are not
serving that end at all.

Right on cue from the leftist revolutionaries who are
committing escalating acts of violence against Donald Trump and his peaceful
supporters, we see a century-past movement reminiscent of the Russian Bolshevik
revolution of 1917, and it’s oddly and appropriately enough coming right on the
tail end of the leftist Obama administration with its divisiveness, racism, intolerance
and unconstitutional maneuverings.

Last night in San Jose, this new Democrat violence
took a mean turn when a young woman who attended the Trump speech was trapped by
a mob and physically attacked while around her the radical Bernie/Hillary
supporters were waving Mexican flags and burning American flags. I guess it’s
clear what cause, principles and nation these violent creatures were supporting.
And if you want an example of a War On Women, the progressive, Democrat
leftists have presented it with this violent attack on a woman. Perhaps the
defining event, in the midst of this violence, was the Democrat Mayor of San
Jose, Sam Liccardo, himself
a Hillary supporter, who dutifully condemned the violence, and of course,
blamed it on Donald Trump and his followers.

It amazes me how people can escape a corrupt,
impoverished nation like Mexico to find sanctuary in America, and then begin
destroying the very thing they left Mexico to find in the first place: stability,
peace and prosperity. How short-sighted can people be? And I assume they are
only trying to assure the election of Bernie or Hillary, both of whom promise them
a non-ending string of goodies from the federal government, but not the freedom
and liberty they should be seeking. These violent events can only assure a
corrupt, violent presidency if the leftist candidate wins the White House in
November.

Thank you, Barack Obama, for laying the groundwork for
this violence and divisiveness as your administration ends in a blaze of
destruction.

Thursday, June 2, 2016

When the child who fell into the cage of Harambe, a silverback
gorilla at the Cincinnati Zoo, was safely rescued after the gorilla was killed,
leftists couldn’t wait to start doubting that the correct political entity came
out of the situation alive (and I use the word “political” knowing full well
what that word means in this morally and intellectually adrift nation). The
gorilla had begun acting erratically and seemed to be threatening the safety of
the child, so the gorilla was killed.
Most people learning of the outcome breathed a sigh of relief at the
safe rescue of the child, but not all.

As is predictable in the erratic, insane and everything-is-political
period of Barack Obama’s administration, PETA began decrying the gorilla’s
death, while at the same time they seemed to resent the safe return of the
child to his mother’s arms.

No one was wishing for the death of the gorilla, but
given the threat to the human boy, the outcome of this event is preferable to
the possible contrary ending. Leftists seem to have developed an updated
version of their black lives matter chatter which has now been revised to: human-lives-don’t-matter.

Unsurprisingly, leftists quickly blamed the child’s
parents for allowing the child out of their sight long enough to fall into the
cage. This was a moment of clarity and truth for leftists, both for seeming to
prefer the welfare of animals over humans, but also because this was a real-life
example of black-lives-matter, which at least reduced the volume of the PETA
bunch AFTER they found out the child has black parents. OOPS!

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Last week Obama was in Hiroshima, once again
apologizing for America’s past actions in the world. Whenever the subject arises
of the United States using an atomic weapon, it must be remembered that Japan
started the war with their unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor, and it was Harry Truman
who had the courage to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to save millions of
lives, Japanese as well as American, and to put an end to the war. As Obama
strutted around like a big shot in front of the Japanese, I couldn’t help but
wonder, in the current-day proliferation of nuclear weapons, if Obama would
have the courage to order the launch of our missiles against a nation which had
already launched a first-strike nuclear attack on the United States. I
seriously doubt it. I believe this fool, America-hating man, would sit on the
decision until a part of the United States was destroyed, and he would, instead
of destroying the attacking nation, likely seek forgiveness and understanding
from the attacker for whatever fantasy reason they had for launching against
us. Thomas Sowell, the prolific author, is on record as believing that in a
situation such as this, where America is threatened with imminent nuclear
destruction, Obama would not only fail to counter-attack, but he would
immediately surrender to the attacking nation. This sounds exactly like the
Obama I know.

Another approach in considering what Obama would do
under attack, is to consider his hate and disgust for our military and the
volunteers who fill its ranks. It’s likely that just on the basis of the
response to an attack being a military action, he would decide to not counter,
and let the US be destroyed. As Commander in Chief of our armed forces, the
President is sworn to defend our Constitution and defend the security of the
nation, which, as a pacifist leftist, is a difficult, if not an impossible,
thing for him to do.

Considering the haste and ease with which Obama signed
an agreement to give a nuke to Iran, who could believe that he could then
launch one of our missiles against them if they attacked us? This action would
be an admission that he was wrong to give them nuclear capacity in the first
place, and Obama will never admit that an action of his was in error. And of
course, since an Islamic missile would be considered a missile of peace from the
religion of peace, how could the militant United States afford to attack it and
expose ourselves to being called war mongers and Islam haters?

I fear that Obama’s long-demonstrated hate for America
and dislike of our power and wealth would cause him to fault on the side of any
enemy. Obama believes it’s just not fair that America should have such power
and comfort in a world of poverty and misery, so he would probably delay a defensive
decision and cause the destruction of America.

Any man, and especially the President of the United States,
who boldly stated that he intended to “fundamentally transform America”, would
very likely not oppose a nuclear attack on America, using the illogic that the
best way to “fundamentally transform America” is to destroy it and then rebuild
it in a sane and humane way with the likes of Obama as its fuhrer. And in my opinion, that’s the hate-America thinking of our Barack
Insane Obama. Given the destruction to our laws and our constitution that Obama
has caused while working internally inside our government, I have no doubt he
would side with an enemy that launched an attack that could destroy us
externally as well.