Forum Help

If you want to ask about changing your username, have login problems, have password problems or a technical issue please email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com

Posting help:

If you want to ask why a word can't be typed, your signature's been changed, or a post has been deleted see the Forum Rules. If you don't find the answer you can ask forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com though due to volumes we can't guarantee replies.

Login to MSE Forum

Join the MSE Forum

Skimlinks adds tracking to some, primarily retailers' links, to show they come from this forum. For some retailers, instead of using Skimlinks to turn the link into a tracked link, we use affiliated links set up through other third parties. Then if it generates revenue from that, this site is paid. The links don't change the content, or what you see or track individual data ? but they do help fund this free forum. So we hope you choose to switch it on. See the full Skimlinks factsheet for more.

It's not designed to be a tax free wheeze for encouraging lodgers - if you claim it you are also excluded from claiming back expenses related to the letting. It's therefore designed to avoid people having to fill in tax returns when they make a small amount of money from letting a room, making expense for both them and HMRC.

The organisers of the campaign want that tax-free allowance upped to £9000 per annum, apparently. Their argument is that it would help prevent repossessions: that's assuming that all those who take in a lodger are struggling with day to day finances.What equivalent subsidy would be available for those don't have the space to take in a lodger?

On Jowo's point, extra lodger capacity is not going to solve a housing shortage - it may help a few singletons but families need affordable long term housing, not a bedroom with little security of tenure..

Even if the campaign is not successful ( and it won't be) it will no doubt generate a boost in business for a particular website

On Jowo's point, extra lodger capacity is not going to solve a housing shortage - it may help a few singletons but families need affordable long term housing, not a bedroom with little security of tenure..

From this article, it appears its popularity is motivated by the stretched finances of the house-owner, increasing by 20+ % over the last few years, Therefore, it actually doesn't look like the low tax threshold is putting many off.

surely people could only take in a lodger if theyve actually got a room which is suitable to have a lodger in?

& is there really a housing shortage?
or is it down to the right mix of housing not being readily available at decent prices?

which would be better:
an elderly woman in a 3/4 bed house with a lodger, whilst a family with 2 kids are cramped into a 2bed house
or
that woman moving into the 2bed house, & the family occupying the 3/4bed house

she could still have a lodger in the 2bed, if wanted, & that would be 100% efficient usage of the bedrooms

If a million people are effectively renting a room in a property rather than finding self-contained property, then there are a million less new households to worry about constructing, that's the point I'm making.

There is a signficant increase in population growth and new households (caused by immigration, divorce, people living longer, more people living alone, etc) so its just as well some of this spurt is being accommodated by people with a spare room who ordinarily would have left them empty.

Any campaign putting pressure on the government to increase the tax free limit for lodgers could easily gain headlines if they reminded the govt what would happen if a million landlords were encouraged to serve notice on a million lodgers on the same day and the million lodgers then presented themselves to their local authority housing department as homeless.

Of course, this level of social activism is unlikely to happen but it would make a great symbolic gesture.

The organisers of the campaign want that tax-free allowance upped to £9000 per annum, apparently. Their argument is that it would help prevent repossessions: that's assuming that all those who take in a lodger are struggling with day to day finances.What equivalent subsidy would be available for those don't have the space to take in a lodger?

On Jowo's point, extra lodger capacity is not going to solve a housing shortage - it may help a few singletons but families need affordable long term housing, not a bedroom with little security of tenure..

Even if the campaign is not successful ( and it won't be) it will no doubt generate a boost in business for a particular website

It will help a great many single people on low income who have no choice but to have a room in someone else's house because they can't afford to live any other way as they have only their one wage and no help from the Government like families do.

I think the lodger allowance should be raised to encourage more people to have lodgers.

To love someone is to learn the song in their heart and to sing it to them when they have forgotten it'I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen. Not only because I see it, but because I see everything by it': C.S. Lewis 'Let me tell you this one thing. When you fall out, as you will, don't get blaming each other. Look inside yourself first'. - Hilda Ogden, to Sally on her wedding day to Kevin, Coronation Street 1986. '

It will help a great many single people on low income who have no choice but to have a room in someone else's house because they can't afford to live any other way as they have only their one wage and no help from the Government like families do.

I think the lodger allowance should be raised to encourage more people to have lodgers.

An increase in the rent a room tax allowance would obviously also help a "great many people" who have bought beyond their means and live in larger properties than they need to: LLs ( whether of tenanted properties or those letting out space in their own home) don't let to others out of altruism, as a public service to the potentially homeless, they do it for their own financial gain Why should only those who have space for lodgers be given a larger tax free allowance?

People that have plenty of money probably wouldn't choose to share their home even if they did have the room. It's people that are skint, like me that do it.

Without my lodgers I would have been reposessed by now. The scheme for tax free income should continue to be encouraged, household bills have shot up loads in the last 12 years, surely its time that the Inland Revenue adjusted the threshold to put the scheme back into the same perspective that it was when first set up.

which would be better:
an elderly woman in a 3/4 bed house with a lodger, whilst a family with 2 kids are cramped into a 2bed house
or
that woman moving into the 2bed house, & the family occupying the 3/4bed house

The elderly woman is unlikely to want to move house whatever happens. So this way she could stay in her house and get two or three lodgers.
Believe me, there is absolutely no shortage of people wanting to lodge. When I get a vacancy and put an advert in our local paper, I could fill that room twenty times over with the response that it generates.

If upping the allowance is intended to prevent repossessions, then the expenditure should be targeted at those who need help to prevent repossession. Otherwise, it's the "Maggie Thatcher" argument i.e. those that don't need the allowance get it anyway and those that can will abuse the system to get an allowance they don't need!

I am reminded of this .... "The only thing we learn from history is that we don't learn"!

MSE is reporting the campaign as a news item and a topic for discussion rather than specifically supporting it AFIAA

“

People that have plenty of money probably wouldn't choose to share their home even if they did have the room. It's people that are skint, like me that do it.

Without my lodgers I would have been reposessed by now. The scheme for tax free income should continue to be encouraged, household bills have shot up loads in the last 12 years, surely its time that the Inland Revenue adjusted the threshold to put the scheme back into the same perspective that it was when first set up.

When you take on lodgers you have the option of whether or not you use the RaR scheme. If your bills are particularly high you may be better accounting for room rental income on your tax return in the standard way

How this site works

We think it's important you understand the strengths and limitations of the site. We're a journalistic website and aim to provide the best MoneySaving guides, tips, tools and techniques, but can't guarantee to be perfect, so do note you use the information at your own risk and we can't accept liability if things go wrong.

This info does not constitute financial advice, always do your own research on top to ensure it's right for your specific circumstances and remember we focus on rates not service.

Do note, while we always aim to give you accurate product info at the point of publication, unfortunately price and terms of products and deals can always be changed by the provider afterwards, so double check first.

We don't as a general policy investigate the solvency of companies mentioned (how likely they are to go bust), but there is a risk any company can struggle and it's rarely made public until it's too late (see the Section 75 guide for protection tips).

We often link to other websites, but we can't be responsible for their content.

Always remember anyone can post on the MSE forums, so it can be very different from our opinion.

MoneySavingExpert.com is part of the MoneySupermarket Group, but is entirely editorially independent. Its stance of putting consumers first is protected and enshrined in the legally-binding MSE Editorial Code.