Monday, March 28, 2016

ARTICLE: Brief Rewriting Tips for the Young (or Any) Lawyer

The below article of mine appeared in last week's March 17, 2016 edition of the Legal Intelligencer and is reprinted here with permission. All rights reserved.Brief Rewriting Tips
for the Young (or Any) Lawyer

by

Daniel
E. Cummins, Esquire

The Legal Intelligencer

March
17, 2016

The
use of simple words, short ­sentences, and narrow paragraphs will render your
work product clear and concise. Pointed sentences composed of tight words will
keep a grasp on the reader, allowing their minds to flow continuously through
your written argument in a focused fashion.

A
long sentence that goes on and on and moves from idea to idea with words and
notions will surely lose the reader at midpoint and make that reader then have
to go back and re-read the sentence more than once in order to understand what
is being conveyed, thereby puzzling the reader and possibly making him or her
lose interest in reading the rest of what you have written because the reader
has forgotten what point the sentence is attempting to convey in the first
place about long sentences. See?

Whenever
possible, sentences should ­instead be limited to the conveyance of one idea.
Where two or more ideas are put forth in a single sentence, see if that
sentence can be broken into two.

With
paragraphs, every attempt should be made to keep your paragraphs limited to one
main idea. This main idea of the paragraph should be emphasized in a topic
sentence written in an active voice, (i.e., place the subject before the verb).

Also,
keeping paragraphs to five ­sentences or less will also make your brief more
pleasing to the reader's eye. Readers coming to a page in your brief that has
words broken down into only two paragraphs are likely going to sigh before
attempting to wade through such verbosity.

And
remember, there is no rule against utilizing a one-sentence paragraph to ­emphasize
an important point.

Avoid Redundant Use of Words

The
redundant use of the same words can be annoying to a reader. Wherever possible,
seek out and utilize a synonym of the repeated word, first making sure that the
meaning of the alternate word is appropriate.

The
exception to this rule in brief-writing is that the terms "plaintiff"
and "defendant" should be repeatedly used so as to keep clear to whom
the writer is referring in any given sentence. These terms should even be used
on appeal in the place of "appellant" or "appellee" for
clarity's sake.

In
fact, Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2131 cautions the appellate
brief writer to keep the use of the terms "appellant" and
"appellee" to a minimum. When using such terms, perhaps the clearer
way would be to utilize "appellant-defendant" the first time that party
is identified and then sticking with "defendant" throughout the
remainder of the brief.

Be Redundant in Your Position

While
redundancy in word use is to be avoided, every effort should be made to
repeatedly state the validity of your legal ­position supporting the relief
requested.

The
first and last sentence of each ­subsection of your brief should contain the
legal conclusion that supports your ­client's position. Brief writers will
often start with a statement of the applicable rule of law but never fully
apply the facts of the matter to that law. Or they will apply the facts to the
law but not write that next, most important, concluding sentence tying it all
together by stating that the law supports the client's position such that the ­relief
requested should be granted.

So
be sure to end each section of the brief with a sentence set forth in an active
voice stating that this part of your legal argument should be accepted as valid
by the court under the law provided. Repeatedly end each section of the brief
with a statement that the motion at issue should therefore be granted or
denied, whatever the case may be.

Be Conversational

Legal
writing courses in law school wrongfully kill creativity in brief writing in
favor of arid, brittle, crisp statements of the law as applied to colorless
adjective-free facts. The result is lifeless law review writing, and who seeks
out law review articles to read after they are written? No one.

So
be conversational in your writing and bring the story of your case to life within
your argument with descriptive but concise words and sentences. Let your
recitation of the facts flow as if you are relaying the story of the case to a
friend. Leave out slang words, but don't be overly formal either. Use your
natural speaking language in your writing.

Robert
Frost has been quoted as writing or saying, "No tears in the writer, no
tears in the reader. No surprise in the writer, no surprise in the
reader."

Similarly,
if there is no feeling conveyed in the writing of the brief in the form of
colorfully vigorous and compelling statements that the law and facts in support
of the ­position of your client, then there is going to be no similar feeling
born in the reader.

Being
conversational includes being polite. Know your place and never tell a judge
that he or she "shall" or "must" accept your position.
Rather, soften such statements by instead writing that "it is respectfully
submitted" that the rule of law requires or mandates the result requested.

Question Presented

A
lot of attorneys glaze over the "Question Presented" section of a
brief and, in doing so, miss another opportunity for the court to read their
client's argument as set forth in a concise and forceful format that
foreshadows the conclusion desired.

It
is a waste to simply state in the "Question Presented" that the
motion at issue should be granted or denied.

Always
begin your "Question Presented" with a phrasing that suggests your
position should carry the day. For example, for the movant, the "Question
Presented" should be positively phrased as, "Whether the motion of
the defendant, John Smith, to compel should be granted where..." and vice
versa.

Then,
as concisely as possible, include in the "Question Presented" the
pertinent facts of your case as applied to the rule of law in a manner that
favors your position. In the end, the "Question Presented" should be
a detailed statement of your legal position in a question format that asks
whether your position should be accepted by the court. As noted below, the
language in your "Question Presented" and conclusion sections should
mirror one another as concise, but not identical, affirmations of your ­client's
position.

Cite the Law

Whenever
you cite a legal principle of law, lend it credence by adding a citation to a
case rule or statute after the end of the sentence. Without citations, your
stated legal principles will appear to be your philosophy of the law and the
reader knows that you are no philosopher of the law.

Lawyers
are trained to cite everything. Judges are lawyers. For lawyers, a citation is
like whipped cream on an ice cream sundae—you don't really take notice of it
when it is there, but you sure do know and protest when it is missing.

The
absence of a citation for a stated position raises a belief in the reader that
there must be no citations supporting the position taken or that the lawyer was
too lazy to look one up. Either way, the instantaneous conclusion of the reader
is that they should therefore not accept the argument put forth as valid or
worth consideration. Avoid this by listing citations wherever possible.

Although
not required, it may be a good idea to identify in the citation the judge who
wrote the decision cited. Judges know each other from traveling in the same
circles and an opinion written by one judge may carry weight with your judge.

Use Conclusion Section for More than a
Conclusion

Some
attorneys may have a ­misperception that the final conclusion section of a
brief can only be utilized for a one-line statement of the relief requested,
i.e., "For the above-stated reasons, it is respectfully requested that the
plaintiff's motion to for summary judgment be granted."

Surely
the last sentence of the brief should be a respectful request for the granting
of the relief requested, but there is no rule stating that one is precluded
from utilizing the conclusion of a brief as one last great opportunity to
encapsulate your client's legal argument. An excellent way to accomplish is to
recast your "Question Presented" as a strong final statement that the
relief requested should be allowed by the court.

Focused Edits

One
can become sick of looking at a written product after a few edits and thereby
lose focus. One way to counter this ­phenomenon is to conduct focused edits of
the document.

Do
a focused edit of only looking at the citations for proper format and
punctuation. Do an edit focused on keeping sentences short and tight. Do
another edit focused only on making sure you have good transitions from one
paragraph to the next and from one section of the brief to the next. Another
edit of your brief can be completed with an eye centered on ensuring that each
section of your brief begins and ends with a concise statement of the legal
relief requested.

At
another run-through, start by editing a section near the end of the brief and
then going back to the beginning in order to have fresh eyes on the latter
sections of a lengthy brief.

It
can be safely said that no great brief was ever written on a first draft. And
so as you work on crafting the best-written product you can produce to which
your paying client is entitled, keep in mind the words of former U.S. Supreme
Court Justice Louis Brandeis: "There is no great writing, only great
rewriting."

Daniel
E. Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton law firm of Foley
Comerford & Cummins. His civil litigation blog, Tort Talk, can be viewed at
www.TortTalk.com.

DISCLAIMER

Daniel E. Cummins, Esquire publishes this site for general informational purposes only. The materials in this website do not constitute legal advice, do necessarily reflect the opinions of the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins or its members, are not an indicator of future results, and are not guaranteed to be current, up-to-date, or applicable to your circumstances. Under no circumstances should you rely upon the information contained in this website without first seeking out and securing your own attorney.

This website and the transmission is not in any way intended, and does not operate, to create an attorney-client relationship with any person or entity. No attorney-client relationship will be created with Daniel E. Cummins, Esquire or the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins unless and until you have purposefully sought to retain us, we have had a chance to clear any conflicts, and you receive a letter from us confirming the creation of an attorney-client relationship and explaining the parameters of the relationship. It is also noted that Attorney Daniel E. Cummins and the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins only practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

With respect to the links on this website, they are not intended as referrals to, or endorsements of, those linked sites.

Neither Daniel E. Cummins nor the law firm of Foley, Cognetti, Comerford, Cimini & Cummins can guarantee that the material accessible from this website will be virus free.

In creating this website, Daniel E. Cummins and the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins have strived to comply with all legal and ethical requirements. Neither Daniel E. Cummins nor the law firm of Foley, Comerford & Cummins or its members intend to practice law in any jurisidiction where they are not licensed to practice. Daniel E. Cummins and Foley, Comerford, & Cummins DISCLAIM ALL EXPRESS WARRANTIES AND IMPLIED WARRANTIES INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.