tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post5225101736049691012..comments2013-12-27T11:46:33.018-08:00Comments on Google Operating System: The Unlikely Integration Between Google News and DiggAlex Chituhttps://plus.google.com/115880905881518206826noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-13796504113049793992010-10-18T05:55:03.151-07:002010-10-18T05:55:03.151-07:00I don&#39;t think Google and Digg have the news in...I don&#39;t think Google and Digg have the news in the same way.Digg strategy is different that&#39;s why Google never band it.Anastasiahttp://daomusic.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-24521339814944637902009-07-09T01:57:33.485-07:002009-07-09T01:57:33.485-07:00I think both use different strategies .I think both use different strategies .quranteachinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04456698022501778710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-77865532565648360982009-04-06T05:10:00.000-07:002009-04-06T05:10:00.000-07:00I was wondering how much Google can take. They are...I was wondering how much Google can take. They are big and main thread to all major search engines, and I am sure majority of the people prefer to use Google as SE. I don’t think digg will come under Google. In near future I haven’t see much a chance Integration Between Google News and Digg.<BR/>They have nothing in common and are different from each others.karel zeman - Go-Gulfhttp://www.go-gulf.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-27750327203275459172009-03-23T08:23:00.000-07:002009-03-23T08:23:00.000-07:00I think that these two are totally alike,no such a...I think that these two are totally alike,<BR/>no such a huge difference there is..!Current Affairshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10089293255306720733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-55302851608467774772008-12-25T23:45:00.000-08:002008-12-25T23:45:00.000-08:00Hi,I don't think Google and Digg have the news in ...Hi,<BR/>I don't think Google and Digg have the news in the same way.Digg strategy is different that's why Google never band it.quranreadinghttp://www.quranreading.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-58497914915228232612008-12-23T22:23:00.000-08:002008-12-23T22:23:00.000-08:00It is very obvious that the google and digg are ve...It is very obvious that the google and digg are very much alike but i don't why google bring digg under the google may be there some thing might be same .<BR/>http://www.cyberdesignz.com/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-42700006561685584552008-07-23T10:43:00.000-07:002008-07-23T10:43:00.000-07:00"it's clear that Digg and Google News don't have a..."it's clear that Digg and Google News don't have almost anything in common"<BR/><BR/>uhm - yeah, about as clear as that sentence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-82341079654552098982008-07-23T10:00:00.000-07:002008-07-23T10:00:00.000-07:00"alternative to Slashdot"I'm fairly sure Digg ad a..."alternative to Slashdot"<BR/><BR/>I'm fairly sure Digg ad an impact on Slashdot readership too, just based on the number of responses many stories get now versus in the past.<BR/><BR/>On the other hand, I don' think Digg has had any impact on the quality of the content at Slashdot.<BR/><BR/>At one extreme Slashdot has content (or more often pointers to other sources of content) that is selected by a few individuals. The value of the site is directly proportional to how well the Slashdot editors pick that content (and they are not always consistent about it).<BR/><BR/>At the other extreme, Google builds news pages strictly (or so they say) by computer algorithm, no doubt, with a lot of tweeking to favor know good sources, etc.<BR/><BR/>Digg goes up the middle of those two extremes and allows the masses to select top stories by voting on them. I tried it when it was fairly new and while most of the users were technically oriented. It did a fairly good job of bubbling "important" articles to the top, although it tends to favor home users over enterprise, and gadget freaks/gamers over serious programmers.<BR/><BR/>There is clearly a lot of gaming of Digg that goes one, and you have to wonder if it wouldn't take as much staff to counter this (on a Google scale) as it would to just select the good articles in the first place.<BR/><BR/>My guess is that Google feels $200M is a good price for the user base, and is not particularly interested in the technology, which they could easily do on their own (or already have).<BR/><BR/>My suspicion is that the average age of Digg users is about 15, and unless this changes I'll probably never be a user of it. Maybe someone (Google) will invent a Digg for adults.macbeachhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16570427618324025947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-14108770209862067282008-07-23T09:57:00.000-07:002008-07-23T09:57:00.000-07:00I totally agree with you. Google News should stay....I totally agree with you. Google News should stay... news. Digg is probably only 50% news anymore if that. <BR/><BR/>Google already owns the domain Digg.ru. Any ideas on what that could mean?<BR/><BR/>http://mavrev.com/index/columns/matt/how_long_has_google_had_their_eye_on_digg_and_whymavrevMatthttp://mavrevmatt.myopenid.com/noreply@blogger.com