I don't know if it's the original one or not, but I don't care.Because this pose could be with every other charatcers as well.Maybe the artists has got an inspiration of this (and maybe could give credits), but it is not stolen, because they have the same position.It's like Iw ould tell you that you stole an idea of the Sonic the hedgehog 1 Cover artwork, just because you would make a photo of yourself showing the forefinger in the air.

I don't know if it's the original one or not, but I don't care.Because this pose could be with every other charatcers as well.Maybe the artists has got an inspiration of this (and maybe could give credits), but it is not stolen, just only because they have the same position.It's like I would tell you that you stole an idea of the Sonic the hedgehog 1 Cover artwork, just because you would make a photo of yourself showing the forefinger in the air.

No, these are exactly alike, if I opened the original picture, then added this as a layer, and made it transparent, then it would be obvious it wasn't "inspired", but in fact traced. Also, it's a bit of a trademark for Sonic to hold his finger in the air.

Holding a Lady in his arms is also a trademark.Come on, that's ONLY a fan-art, so what do you want to prove?The user doesn't even own the licence on Sonally, and makanindomie also does not own the licence on Sonamy, because Sega does!So what's the point in arguing?Nobody does get money from it!I guess that everybdoy of you are doing this only because you hate Sonally.

I don't know if it's the original one or not, but I don't care.Because this pose could be with every other charatcers as well.Maybe the artists has got an inspiration of this (and maybe could give credits), but it is not stolen, just only because they have the same position.It's like I would tell you that you stole an idea of the Sonic the hedgehog 1 Cover artwork, just because you would make a photo of yourself showing the forefinger in the air.

well I think it is in part an art steal because they dont give the credit to the original artist, they give credit to the one who recolored the base, even worse, there will be people who thoug that the drawing was 100% original from when it actually is from