If I was a betting man, I'd put money on Joe Manganiello being Superman for the JLA movie (if they do go with two Supermans). He was apparently down to the last two for Man of Steel, but couldn't get out of True Blood commitments so Cavil got the role. Plus with roles in HIMYM, Magic Mike and True Blood, I'd say he'd be a safe bet.

Arnie Hammer will probably get Batman for JLA and I doubt they'll do another Batman reboot till after JLA comes out in 2015.

Invader_Ace -> RE: Batman after Nolan (19/10/2012 1:03:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon if they do go with two Supermans

This would be a terrible, terrible idea. Either have Cavill as Superman or jetison him for any Stand-alone Superman sequels. Two actors playing the same role might be the kind of thing that flew in the 50s, but not now.

Also, I don't think the previous "no-tie in" confirmations are worth anything to be honest. It's such a vague term, it could just mean, no references to a wider universe, which would be fine.

Think they'll keep Reynolds for Lantern or go with a different actor or lantern? Maybe John Stewart like in the Cartoons?

Timon -> RE: Batman after Nolan (19/10/2012 1:06:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invader_Ace

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timon if they do go with two Supermans

This would be a terrible, terrible idea.

But it appears to be the way they're going...

From Synder: "It doesn’t. Like what Chris Nolan is doing and what I’m doing with Superman, what they’ll do with Justice League will be it’s own thing with it’s own Batman and […] Superman. We’ll be over here with our movie and they’ll kind of get to do it twice which is kind of cool.”

i don't see anything wrong with two versions of Superman. The way I see it! the more version we get the more chance we mighteventually get a good one!! . Looking forward to a JLA version Superman and Batman for sure! much more likely we will get decent versions! Just so long as Nolan doesn't get involved and bore the Superpants off it!