The language of African Americans has long been under scrutiny for its differences from what is considered standard English. Ebonics, a term coined by the mixing of the words “ebony” and “phonics,” refers to the speech generally used by black people. Dr. Robert Williams, an African-American social psychologist, came up with the term in 1973 with the goal of making a word for the sounds that black people make when speaking.

Some of the negative reactions toward Ebonics in the classroom stem from the misinterpretation of the notion as “proposals to teach Ebonics itself, or to teach in Ebonics, rather than as proposals to respect and take it into account while teaching standard English”; others are fearful that Ebonics will replace English as a whole. However, the introduction of Ebonics into classrooms will have rather compelling benefits. First of all, Ebonics is only an extension of the English that has already been established as a universal language, not an entirely new and independent one. On top of that, the method of using Ebonics to study English, “contrastive analysis,” forces students to look for the similarities and differences between the different speeches and critically think about each their contrasting relationship.

Dekalb County, in Georgia, and Los Angeles have been using this method to increase Ebonics-speakers’ aptitude reading and writing in Standard English, and it has worked since the 1960s. Teachers who would like to bring Ebonics into the classroom have stated that instead of teaching Ebonics as another language, they would be acknowledging it as a cultural speech that came out of the United States during a difficult time in history.

Ebonics in the classroom comes with some disadvantages, but probably not for the reasons many Americans might think. The disadvantages are less about the language and more about how Americans will receive the speech.

One of the disadvantages is that the acknowledgement of Ebonics in the classroom could cause segregation, as educators would be teaching students of Ebonics and students of Standard English in different ways, ultimately creating a barrier between the students. Stigmatization is also a concern with Ebonics in the classroom, as students and adults alike may regard those who speak Ebonics as of a lower language capability than the standard American.

The complex, institutionalized and asymmetrical power dynamic in America also contributes to this problem of perception toward Ebonics. As it is established, Standard English is more widely accepted than Ebonics, and by social norms, people speaking Standard English has more power and agency. Standard English is the speech of “success and power and economic opportunity,” and to survive in America is to conform to the society and its norms, one of those being speaking “proper English,” which once again brings us back into times of segregation.

Change and difference is not accepted because most Americans know only white culture and sameness. As a result, because of the racial inequity in America, speaking Ebonics could turn into a form of self-impediment rather than a token of cultural pride.

Ebonics has English origins, but many Americans want to believe that this way of speech is “slang,” “mutant,” “lazy,” “defective” and “ungrammatical.” But in all seriousness, how were black people supposed to learn “proper English” when they were enslaved, segregated and banned from education? Isn’t it similar to asking someone to climb Everest without the necessary tools? The tools were not given to African Americans, so they developed a means of communication that is now rendered unacceptable by the very society that denied them the needed tools in the first place.