Rhinehold

Co-Host of We Are Libertarians

Rhinehold is a Libertarian writer who has been commenting on US and World politics since the early 1990s. He is a Lockean Classical Liberal who believes "People should be free to live their lives as they choose as long as they don't vioalte the rights of others to the same." His writing has appeared on Watchblog and Newsvine. He resides in Indiana with his wife and several rescues.

libertarian, libertarianism, opinion, politics

July 3rd, 2019
|
2 hrs 4 mins

libertarian, libertarianism, opinion, politics

Chris Spangle, Harry Price, Rhinehold, Paul Copeland and Hodey Johns discuss the deteriorating conditions at the southern border. While immigration is a factor, our discussion is on the rights of prisoners. First, we tell you the conditions within the detention facilities. Then we discuss what rights a prisoner of the United States ought to have. We end by determining what Constitutional rights non-citizens have based on the Founders and the Supreme Court.

July 3rd, 2019
|
1 hr 4 mins

libertarian, libertarianism, opinion, politics

Chris Spangle, Harry Price, Rhinehold, Paul Copeland and Hodey Johns discuss getting dragged into a discussion between the LP and their Presidential candidates. We celebrate the 100th and final Daily. It will be re-branded and moved to a different feed.

libertarian, libertarianism, opinion, politics

May 2nd, 2019
|
36 mins 57 secs

libertarian, libertarianism, opinion, politics

On Tuesday, a violent demonstration and counter-protest occurred in Venezuela. Rhinehold, Dale Melchin, and Hodey Johns gave (literally) up to the minute information as well as a quick detailing of how they got there, lessons we can learn, what happened, and how we can help.

February 7th, 2019
|
20 mins 41 secs

libertarian, libertarianism, opinion, politics

Rhinehold discusses Citizens United, the Supreme Court decision that affirmed free speech rights for individuals when they are acting in coordination with other individuals within a defined group. This includes an examination of the history of the decision and what the detractors get wrong in their opposition.