1. 4,000 doesn't seem like much of a thing anymore. He damn near did it last year. Over.

2. Career or season? Either way...under.

3. I was going to put 12 Monkeys, but that's pretty obvious, so my inclination was to go with coincidentally another Gilliam flick...Time Bandits. It doesn't hold up as well as some of his others, but damn did I love that movie when I was a kid.

4. Because Sixth Sense. It wasn't just good, it was a transcendent game changer. Say what you want about MKS now, that movie alone puts him in rare company among directors. Signs was good and, even though it took 5 years, people eventually realized how great Unbreakable was. He might deliver shit sandwich after shit sandwich now, but you can't deny the guy's historical resume unless you have an agenda. So, he will always get more flicks to try to regain that magic. And to tell the truth, if I was some bigshot Hollywood producer, I'm not sure I wouldn't roll the dice on that guy a few times. You never know.

Hikohadon wrote:1. Do you take the over or under on Brandon Weeden throwing for 4000 yards?

2. Do you take the over or under on Trent Richardson running for 1250 yards?

3. What's the best movie involving time travel?

4. How does M. Night Shyamalan still get directing jobs (After Earth 13% on Rotten Tomatoes)?

5. Would you rather lose a hand or a foot?

1. Over2. Over3. Time After Time4. See MoScratcher's response5. Foot but it's close. Racquetball would be mutha w/a prosthetic foot and you only need one hand to swing, shoot, type, etc. But I'd still go with the foot.

You people saying foot instead of hand need to hang out in the rehabilitation center at a VA clinic for a day. Even with one of those high end space age metal prosthetic's, putting the weight of your entire body on a stump and one leg all day can be excruciating.

"I don't think they're building chemical weapons in Berea. But they might be. I can't say for sure."Chuck Klosterman

Govbarney wrote:You people saying foot instead of hand need to hang out in the rehabilitation center at a VA clinic for a day. Even with one of those high end space age metal prosthetic's, putting the weight of your entire body on a stump and one leg all day can be excruciating.

Who stands all day? Between work, driving, watching TV, I'd have to think I spent 75% of my time sitting.

Dude ran in the Olympics with a prosthetic leg. Saw a guy just yesterday that walked/stood completely normally before noticing that he had one of those foot contraptions. The days of wooden legs are long gone.

Besides, losing a hand much more impairs my ability to work than losing a foot. Not to mention other activities I like to do. I don't think it's even close.

Govbarney wrote:You people saying foot instead of hand need to hang out in the rehabilitation center at a VA clinic for a day. Even with one of those high end space age metal prosthetic's, putting the weight of your entire body on a stump and one leg all day can be excruciating.

Who stands all day? Between work, driving, watching TV, I'd have to think I spent 75% of my time sitting.

Dude ran in the Olympics with a prosthetic leg. Saw a guy just yesterday that walked/stood completely normally before noticing that he had one of those foot contraptions. The days of wooden legs are long gone.

Besides, losing a hand much more impairs my ability to work than losing a foot. Not to mention other activities I like to do. I don't think it's even close.

The physical therapy involved to learn to use those prosthetic feet/legs is far more demanding then the hand prosthesis's.

That being said , after thinking about it some I guess it would depend on which hand. I am right handed , so in the battle of left hand vs any foot, I am saying good by to old lefty. But when it comes to the right hand yeah , then Id be hard press not to choose foot.

Also the method of how I lost the limb would play into it, allot more muscle, bone and nerve to cut through when your taking off a foot.

"I don't think they're building chemical weapons in Berea. But they might be. I can't say for sure."Chuck Klosterman

Govbarney wrote:You people saying foot instead of hand need to hang out in the rehabilitation center at a VA clinic for a day. Even with one of those high end space age metal prosthetic's, putting the weight of your entire body on a stump and one leg all day can be excruciating.

In my field I could still work in a wheelchair, but need both hands. Also there's typing and working on stuff and making food.

And besides that I've been married 26 years, without hands I have no sex life.

Hikohadon wrote:Dude ran in the Olympics with a prosthetic leg. Saw a guy just yesterday that walked/stood completely normally before noticing that he had one of those foot contraptions. The days of wooden legs are long gone.

Alex Zanardi lost both legs in an IndyCar crash. He's still driving race cars and winning, and won metals in the paralympics. An inspiration.

I can't believe 5QF is being sullied by being in the forum for the dirtbag Browns.

BUT OF COURSE I WILL ANSWER YOUR WONDERFUL QUESTIONS, HIKO. YOU ARE JUST DELIGHTFUL. IT'S 4:52 AM.

1. Under. Unless our WRs have hands on their feet.

2. Under. Unless he can stay healthy.

3. Back to the Future. NEVER trust those goddamn Libyans.

4. How is Michael Bay still directing films? That's the bigger question.

5. I find the circumstances under which I would lose said hand or foot to be much more important than then part itself. But since you could not be bothered by challenging the readers with interesting scenarios were they would have to make a possible life altering choice, "hand or foot?"..... i'll say foot.

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:4. How is Michael Bay still directing films? That's the bigger question.

His movies make money. I hate the guy as much as you do - more, probably, from personal experience - but his movies keep pulling in the unwashed masses.

M-Night? His flicks not only suck but they bomb too. I've seen directors blacklisted for much much less, yet he keeps pulling films with $130 million budgets despite the likelihood that it will suck AND lose money.

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I can't believe 5QF is being sullied by being in the forum for the dirtbag Browns.

BUT OF COURSE I WILL ANSWER YOUR WONDERFUL QUESTIONS, HIKO. YOU ARE JUST DELIGHTFUL. IT'S 4:52 AM.

1. Under. Unless our WRs have hands on their feet.

2. Under. Unless he can stay healthy.

3. Back to the Future. NEVER trust those goddamn Libyans.

4. How is Michael Bay still directing films? That's the bigger question.

5. I find the circumstances under which I would lose said hand or foot to be much more important than then part itself. But since you could not be bothered by challenging the readers with interesting scenarios were they would have to make a possible life altering choice, "hand or foot?"..... i'll say foot.

Truth is, you're probably right about Back to the Future. It's hard to argue that anything is better than that. 12 Monkeys is probably the only thing that could enter the discussion, and which flick you prefer probably depends on you r age and worldview.

1) Over (because who doesn't throw for that much)2) Under3) Primer or Star Trek Generations4) Because Brett Ratner can still get directing jobs5) Foot. Alex Zanardi can still drive a race car with no legs. Chubbs can't golf without a hand.

"All Beckett needs to do to cap off this mess is order some fried chicken and beer" – 5/10/12 before Beckett got chased in the 3rd at Fenway.

Hikohadon wrote:1. Do you take the over or under on Brandon Weeden throwing for 4000 yards?

2. Do you take the over or under on Trent Richardson running for 1250 yards?

3. What's the best movie involving time travel?

4. How does M. Night Shyamalan still get directing jobs (After Earth 13% on Rotten Tomatoes)?

5. Would you rather lose a hand or a foot?

1 -- Slightly under2 -- Under3 -- How about that Star Trek movie where Kirk and Spock went back to our day to find whales and transport them to the ocean of their future time. Can't remember the title.4 -- I did like that movie M. Night did about the alien invasion, can't think of the name.5 -- Foot.