If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Anthony Weiner used Twitter to establish his feisty personality with a nationwide community, but it was also his undoing.

(WIRED) -- Now that the Anthony Weiner Twitter meltdown has pretty much played out, I'm surprised that there hasn't been much discussion of the butterfly wing-flap that brought him down: Twitter's rules of engagement when it comes to "following."

The success of a social network is largely determined by its settings. In 2006, an engineer named Jack Dorsey had an idea for a way for people to share short updates on their lives with friends and family.

Working with a small team, Dorsey and his colleagues began developing and testing the product. This included determining the built-in boundaries of the service, a process which would determine the breadth and purpose of the entire project.

Twitter was a simple idea but settings had to be just right, like the proper temperature for a soufflé.

Should the rules be very restrictive, to preserve privacy and intimacy? (Too much restriction would make the service less useful.) Or should they be expansive, and invite a wide circle to share one's status reports? (Too broad a channel would mean a depersonalized cohort.)

The breakthrough that enabled Twitter to become the wildly successful service it is now came from a twist that was much more significant than even its founders knew: They made it possible to "follow" someone's messages without requiring permission.

Essentially you would take out a subscription to someone's Twitter stream. You would follow your best friend or your brother in the same way you would follow Barack Obama, DeSean Jackson or the New York Times.

Twitter's operational decisions in no way contributed to Weiner's downfall. His narcissism did.

I think you may have missed the point. Naturally, Weiner is completely at fault here. However, the design of Twitter itself as well as the way one-on-one communication is handled by the system allowed others to clearly track Weiner's activity in a way that would have been difficult if he's used the privacy options on FB or if he'd used IM.

Twitter was the perfect platform for this type of ultra-public downfall. ;)