Why do you suppose they like ZIPs more? Maybe it's because it's easier to test the hotfixes? Or is it because of the uninstall-first-before-upgrading step with the installer? Perhaps you could have a poll

Personally, I prefer installers in _general_ because of the following: * I do not have to worry about the upgrade process. I know that my preferences are going to be retained. * I like the fact that all paths are consistent and that the program is going to be installed within "Program Files". I dare say that this is also highly beneficial when solving bugs. * I don't have to deal with the hassle of creating start menu or desktop short-cuts. * If I want to clear up space or clean up Windows, I just go to the program manager and nuke stuff that I don't need. (Not that this is ever going to happen here )

IMHO, besides portability and perhaps the inherent option of having multiple versions of an application on the same PC, I can't see how ZIP packages can appear to be friendlier than installers. That said, I'd like to have both options available

This has probably becoming annoyingly long now; so I'll stop. Thanks for listening

I got an error last night, while running the 32 and the 64 versions (the same error) but I still can't duplicate the error so I can send you. It happened while trying to make a "undo" but it was not the already known "don't have undo file". If I manage to make Apo glitch again on that, I will let you know. Thanks for your hard work!