This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

" ...generally considered to be Al-zahir Biabars who became Sultan of Egypt in 1260! ". how generally considered ? : never any historian said al zahir baibars led this battle. many people used to have same name . Actually you need to put a citation that they were same person not vv :) Samsam22 (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Are the numbers for each side correct? I have always been under the assumption that the Crusaders were outnumbered (as they normally were infact) in this battle? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.50.47 (talk) 11:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

who write the assumption this Baibars was not the Sultan Baibars? and i want to hear the argumentAhendra (talk) 14:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The article on the Sultan Baibars says that he was the commander of the victorious troops at La Forbie in 1244. Jsc1973 (talk) 05:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

At the moment the infobox 'result' states: "Ayyubid victory" On looking further down, I see the word 'Ayyubid' is on both sides. Its only when one reads the article that the result becomes more clear. This rather defeats the object of having an infobox.
The 'result' should be a lot more obvious, otherwise...