So Bard, now you want to draw a very small circle within a much bigger circle. Sadly, looking at the waste of war since 2001, starting everything isn't near as difficult as completing the tasks. Just ask Bush and Cheney. Not only could they not finish their wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, they ultimately dumped the world off in financial disaster.

Okay smart ass, here it goes. Obama 1541 dead, Bush 575 dead. Obama's been in 4 years, bush for 8, so it's 4 times as many dead per year.

Hey Chandler, I didn't like Bush, nor was I for the wars...However, BO is still losing men, and we may be in Syria or Iran soon thanks to the great leadership in bringing down those stable dictators in Libya, Iraq, Egypt and soon Syria. I don't even want to mention the cowardice in Benghazi. We were attacked ON AMERICAN SOIL, and the coward in cheif didn't send so much as a handkerchief.

Okay smart ass, here it goes. Obama 1541 dead, Bush 575 dead. Obama's been in 4 years, bush for 8, so it's 4 times as many dead per year.

Oh, gosh. Now I have to point out the obvious to the blind.

SIGH.

In Iraq, we lost 4488 military since the beginning. Since Obama took office, we've lost only 256.

4488 - 256 = 4232 for Bush

256 for Obama.

How do you calculate that percentage, Mr. B?

What? You say it doesn't count because it disproves your point? It doesn't count because Obama stopped the Iraq war? It doesn't count because you don't want it to count? It doesn't count because you have your head in the sand?

Perhaps you really did have trouble with that fourth grade addition 'n subtraction nonsense. That math crap wasn't worth your time then -- or now.

stevenbard wrote:

We were attacked ON AMERICAN SOIL, and the coward in cheif didn't send so much as a handkerchief.

War is one thing. An attack on AMERICAN SOIL is another.

Oh, you mean like that attack on the Twin Towers, for which (a) we had a warning that was ignored, and (b) we retaliated against Iraq while we ignored bin Laden because "nobody cares about him"?

Steve, these dimwits don't know the difference. Very few of them would have even condoned, let alone supported, WWII after Pearl Harbor or the Cold War after the Cuban missile crisis. That they'd rather be Red (or Nazis) than dead is clearly shown by the fact that they express every day their Red leanings. They also wear the combat death count of volunteer soldiers on their sleeves despite waging war against the government benefits provided our armed services.

As the tee shirt says, "We don't have an anger problem; we have an idiot problem".

I wonder how much of today's Benghazi hearings they will watch in search of the truth. Oops, never mind; we know the answer. I'll be both watching and recording every minute, ready to switch to CSPAN if Fox diverts its attention to that Missing Teens Found story. The eyewitness accounts of the Benghazi career civil servants and spooks apparently show criminal coverups st State and the White House, for which heads should roll.

Okay smart ass, here it goes. Obama 1541 dead, Bush 575 dead. Obama's been in 4 years, bush for 8, so it's 4 times as many dead per year.

Hey Chandler, I didn't like Bush, nor was I for the wars...However, BO is still losing men, and we may be in Syria or Iran soon thanks to the great leadership in bringing down those stable dictators in Libya, Iraq, Egypt and soon Syria. I don't even want to mention the cowardice in Benghazi. We were attacked ON AMERICAN SOIL, and the coward in cheif didn't send so much as a handkerchief.

War is one thing. An attack on AMERICAN SOIL is another.

No, Steve - an attack on american soil actually is War - if the attacker is a sovereign state or entity.

That was not the case in Benghazi. By the time an American task force could be on the ground at the site, the attack was over and Ambassador Stevens was brought to the hospital - by Libyans. What would you have done, carpet-bomb them?

You also clearly don't understand that our sometimes tacit, more often material support for "stable dictatorships" like Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan, Chile (and the list of past and present dictatorships goes on) is the prime motivation for terrorist attacks against the United States._________________florian - ny22

Obama 1541 dead, Bush 575 dead. Obama's been in 4 years, bush for 8, so it's 4 times as many dead per year.

Isn't it convenient that the bodycounting Bush Bashers overlook the fact that "In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolution", as CNN put it?

Isn't it convenient that the bodycounting Bush Bashers overlook the fact that "In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolution", as CNN put it?

The one's Bush knew didn't exist but decided to say them that makin's did exist during his State of the Union speech. Remember? Yellow cake uranium and aluminum tubes? Oh, right, "History will be the judge."_________________Support Your Sport. Join US Windsurfing!
www.USWindsurfing.org

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou cannot download files in this forum