Debunked by disinfo agents? Sure the same people that concocted this fiasco to begin with? The easy way to convince people they saw something they
didn't is to create more false information to "debunk".

I have a problem you see, I have a brain and fortunately I use it when I am being fed a crock of lies that defy all manners of physics.

I have absolutely no problem with you being duped.

You are in the minority if you think the official version is the truth.

Come on seagull my man...Do we still believe the Kennedy assassination was carried out by a lone assassin, too?

No buildings since or before ever fell this way much less 3 on the same day...the same way....are you seriously going to deny that? 3 huge steel
skyscrapers just collapsed free fall without any help other than fire?

Apparently you have not looked into the aviation principles of aircraft and their capabilities with regard to air speed and altitude. The planes they
claim were used in this travesty would have been structurally incapable of doing anything other than falling apart when striking a steel structure,
they would have crumbled and fallen to the ground in pieces, not dissolved into the building.

So then cars that hit concrete walls should stop dead instantly. Straw and other light objects that hil telephone poles during a tornado shouldn't go
into them like a hot knife through butter. When my truck hits a deer it shouldn't do $13,000 in damage to my truck.

All those scenarios are objects doing what they aren't supposed to be able to, yet somehow they did. But aircraft are supposed to hit something at
high speed and just stop dead? What branch of physics is that in?

For everyone of these links I can post another one to refute it. The fact remains the events of that day and the resulting changes in the
infrastructure happened. There is no disputing that. If you want to believe the OS and how they decided to bring about all these changes with the use
of a NEW Pearl Harbor that is up to you.

Please explain what "New Pearl Harbor" means. Since 9/11, the U.S. military has suffered financially and from personnel aspect.

Try wrapping your head around the fact that you fell for a trick, you watched a magic show happen and left the show believing all of it? That
is sad.

I already known from experience that Truthers were duped by disinformation on many occasions, especially on ACARS and the 9/11 airliners.

I have had to correct Truthers when they misidentified aerodynamic fairings and MLG doors beneath United 175 as an modified pod. One individual even
mistaken the paint scheme on the bottom fuselage as a pod.

I have had to correct Truthers when they claimed that only a crater was found at Shanksville and no aircraft wreckage was found. They expected to find
intact tail sections, fuselage and engines. That doesn't happen in the real world when aircraft crash into the ground at high velocities. Check it
out.

I have had to correct Truthers when they claimed that the 9/11 airliners were flown under remote control. I knew that was false because there was no
way to modify the B-767 and the B-757 to fly under remote control without extensively redesigning the flight control systems and to do so, would have
created paper trails all over the United States that would have led back to the culprits. In addition, they are not fly-by-wire aircraft and there was
no way such aircraft can be switched and not attract a lot of attention.

The Philippine government had warned the United States as far back as 1995 that terrorist would use airliners to kill thousands of people, which was
uncovered when Philippine officials broke up the Bojinka Plot in 1995.

One of the terrorist involved in the Bojinka Plot was the terrorist who bombed WTC 1 in 1993 and he is the nephew of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the
mastermind of 9/11. In other words, there was no U.S. government 9/11 conspiracy.

The greatest trick is the one where they pulled the wool over the eyes and eliminated common sense.

Just step outside of your box for a moment and try to focus.

Many people still believe that the original pearl harbor was true. If you were not there and learned in the history books the official version of any
war you have been given misinformation on all of it.

They will tell you what they want you to know, not what the truth is.

9/11 for many was taught in history books. For me, I watched it unfold.

I was shocked. I was angry. I was saddened. I wanted to find those responsible and punish them. I watched 3 buildings crash down that day. I
witnessed the aftermath, of shanksville and the pentagon. I heard all the reports coming in. I have been detained and forced to give up freedoms in
the name of justice. The price to pay for safety.

I still, never believed that any of it was being reported factually, but after 14 years, no matter who you are, if you still believe the events of
that day transpired the way they presented it, that is one deep hole you have your head in and no amount of digging is going to get it out.

One of the terrorist involved in the Bojinka Plot was the terrorist who bombed WTC 1 in 1993 and he is the nephew of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the
mastermind of 9/11. In other words, there was no U.S. government 9/11 conspiracy.

Those are some of the questions that need answering about 911. How warnings, why warnings, were ignored by people who should have known better.

You have not demonstrated anything. You refuse to acknowledge that your view has been skewed. You have not offered anything that refutes or supports
other than supposition. I did research, but I do not need to read or watch videos to tell me they lied about all of it.

Sure. That's what happened. Watch a few demolition examples. No amount of plane fuel would support this. You could dump 3 trillion gallons of
plane fuel on the top of any steel structure in the world and set it on fire and not one single building would fall into its own footprint and turn
into a pile of molten steel and dust while shooting projectiles from it as it was falling.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.