Curriculum 901 901 transparency lessons in taking back monopoly to rule, from professions who start to do harm

This curriculum is currently seeking world leading educators of modules listed below. It is one of the curriculum most valued by Norman Macrae Foundation because Norman's life (pre- and post- world war 2) experienced many challenges first hand when professionals (accidentally or knowingly) got hired out to big brothers - the monopoly that society has licensed to them to rule no harm over

week 1 - what gandhi with einstein learnt about the destruction to his peoples being accidentally compounded by professions of the empire

week 2 - what gandhi meant by satyagraha or whole truth, what winston churchill meant by inconvenient truth, why orwell believed the big brother scenario was the greatest risk of the age when technology makes worldwide peoples more connected than separated

week 3 what keynes meant be economists being only capable of compounding 2 opposite outcomes -designing or destroying the future market purposes most wanted by 99% of people for their children

week 4 what The Economist meant by starting up Entrepreneurial Revolution dialogues -from 1976 - on reasons why new capitalism would be needed- specifically none of 20th C largest organisational typologies being capable of sustaining multi-win models that first net generation would need

case discussion : if boulding is correct in his formation of the basic molecule of economics as sceince being value exchanges of productive and demanding relationships, then from disaster analyses it is known that the tensions in such systems cause even a perfectly designed system to degenerate unless it is contextaully audited around its purpose so as to prevent conflicts from creeping in to the system either from changes in external environment or due to blocks to inflormation-action flows inside the organisation. MOst disater analyses are never publicly reported in ways that enumerates system degradation- however one audit of the last manned pspaeship NASA lost truly reported over 50 such instances of relationship degradation -no single one caused the loss, collectively they almost certainly did.

week 5 discussion of what is greatest risk (or probability of doing harm) that each different global profession is most at risk of compounding through 2010s; which professions have changed their main system rules (which they monopoloise over) in the last 3 decade changeover from being more locally separated to being more globally interconnected

week 6 which media are on the side of the people and the public service that communitoes need to be sustainable, and whoch media are on the side of big brothrers and global professions who prioritise extracting short-term profits as more important than doing no harm - discuu whether the human race can survive if economics of exterenalisation continues to co[pound riska at boundaries of a world whose only futures are increasingly borderless

a common theme to weeks 1 to 6 as well as those whose system maps rule the world emerges from this case:

introduction while some problems of transparent system design involve correct maths auditing- discuss the simple idea of whether big decision-makers would vary decisions if they know that goodwill is ultimately governed by value multiplication not value ad - case big 5 accountant andersen - in racing to control monopoly of metrics over the world's largest boardrooms, the big 5 accountants of the 1990s were led by Andersen, whose staff famously caleed themselves androids. Repetedly Androids beleived that the more hundreds of billions dolars they were valued by their biggest clients however much harm (make them worth nothing) they did to society , their future would grwo because billions plus zero = billions. They did not believe that goodwill is ultimately a multiplicative dynamic where billions*zero =0. While some thought thye punsihment of taking away the license to account was too harsh to andersen, the harm they propagated through such clients as Enron, worldcom .... many dotcoms was far more than the zeroisation of stockhodler funds. Matjemmatically goodwill is not being transparently regulated unless professions who do harm have their licence revoked by society. And proessions who do not know how to model goodwill's value multiplication have no longer any excuse to plead ignorance

Dad (Norman Macrae) created the genre Entrepreneurial Revolution to debate how to make the net generation the most productive and collaborative . We had first participated in computer assisted learning experiments in 1972. Welcome to more than 40 years of linking pro-youth economics networks- debating can the internet be the smartest media our species has ever collaborated around?

1972: Norman Macrae starts up Entrepreneurial Revolution debates in The Economist. Will we the peoples be in time to change 20th C largest system designs and make 2010s worldwide youth's most productive time? or will we go global in a way that ends sustainability of ever more villages/communities? Drayton was inspired by this genre to coin social entrepreneur in 1978 ,,continue the futures debate here