I have purchased this sword while deployed to afghanistan from a local afghan. He said the sword was used in the afghan army but couldnt give a time frame, though it looks somewhat antique. i have restored the sword as best i can right now (removing loads of rust, cleaning, oiling, conditioning the sheath, etc. the sheath has what appears ot be the national seal of afghanistan. If someone could provide any info on this sword I would appreciate it.Attachment: 175.62 KBafghan sealAttachment: 218.06 KBafghan sword [ Download ]Attachment: 235.46 KBgrip [ Download ]

That said, the verifiable Afghan army swords I've seen have copied European styles (or styles fashionable in Europe) and the 19th century Afghan arms and armor I've seen (swords, rifles etc) have featured the coat of arms, a domed mosque flanked by two flags in the center of a star. On swords this is stamped on the blade, near the hilt.

As a general comment, I would say the sword looks too new, there does not seem to be a natural patina.'We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose.' - Adrian Carton de Wiart

i did spend many hours with various tools, stones, oils, etc, cleaning the various rust, stains, pitting and other discolorations. maybe i should have taken a photo of when i first received it. the sword has no stamp or marking that i noticed, but looked between 10-30 years old when i purchased it. I purchased it as a gift for a friend and would like to restore it to like new quality, so hopefully it looks even better soon. thanks for the response

My humble opinion would be that it was never intended for military use. Perhaps ceremonial ? The hilt,which appears to be one piece, cast in brass, definately reminds me of a cheap replica sword. The garish details and uneven lines don't show the attention to detail that you would see in a sword meant for business,so to speak. In contrast,observe this example here,also from Afghanistan http://art-of-swords.tumblr.com/post/50508865...dated-18th

The scabbard is rather intriguing,to me it looks like it may not have even orignally belonged to the sword, and is made with a bit more attention to detail. It's hard to tell with these sorts of things though... if only it could talk,right? And I also will state that i am certainly no expert on Middle-Eastern swords.

Also,I could be wrong,but it almost looks as if the coat of arms was added to the scabbard at a later date.Wounds of flesh a surgeons skill may heal...

But wounded honor is only cured with steel.

We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves.
Each of us should please his neighbor for his good ,to build him up.
Romans 15:1-2

the Afghan that i bought it from did say the sword was only ceremonial, and may not have been a standard issue sword, who knows... the scabbard is wooden, covered with some type of animal skin. the seller had two of these swords. i believed that they appered to be between 10-30 years old, so not really an antique, but still a piece of history, just dont know exactly what piece. thanks for the insight

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou can download files in this forum