If nancy has this hypocrisy, so does Flags. He basically said the samething as Nancy. We're not allowed to discuss bills until after they are passed and signed into law. It might make his guy look bad.

If nancy has this hypocrisy, so does Flags. He basically said the samething as Nancy. We're not allowed to discuss bills until after they are passed and signed into law. It might make his guy look bad.

If nancy has this hypocrisy, so does Flags. He basically said the samething as Nancy. We're not allowed to discuss bills until after they are passed and signed into law. It might make his guy look bad.

That doesn't even make sense. In this topic, flags hasn't said anything about passing bills other than his comments (accurate too) about quotes from Obama and Pelosi. Flags has not said anything about having to pass a bill to find out what's in it.

And FWIW, flags wasn't a Trump guy. IIRC, flags was for Cruz and maybe Rubio in the primaries (flags correct me if I'm wrong). There was maybe a handful of members who were for Trump from the git-go and the rest of us seemed to be split up on other candidates.

If you're trying to further the discussion, your comment is falling flat and is irrelevant. If you're trying to start an argument/discussion with flags, you might try commenting on things he's said in this topic.

LMAO!!! Cal, you know better than that!! FM seems to have lost his spunk in sparring with me (since I slap him around like a little girl in those spars) so he is trying to antagonize others with his usual baiting and circular arguments that mean absolutely nothing.

I highly doubt he's lost his spunk for argufying with anybody. That's just his DNA. But arguing against comments that haven't been made is like bringing your own straw and doll clothes to make a straw-man argument.

That doesn't even make sense. In this topic, flags hasn't said anything about passing bills other than his comments (accurate too) about quotes from Obama and Pelosi. Flags has not said anything about having to pass a bill to find out what's in it.

And FWIW, flags wasn't a Trump guy. IIRC, flags was for Cruz and maybe Rubio in the primaries (flags correct me if I'm wrong). There was maybe a handful of members who were for Trump from the git-go and the rest of us seemed to be split upon other candidates.

If you're trying to further the discussion, your comment is falling flat and is irrelevant. If you're trying to start an argument/discussion with flags, you might try commenting on things he's said in this topic.

100% correct Cal. Based on what you post I'd say Mousey is off on a tangent again. I have never said don't debate a bill but getting your panties in a twist before we actually have a bill is foolish. Anyone with half a brain knows this thing will look different when it finally gets voted on.

As to preferred candidates I aligned closest with Rubio followed by Cruz. I voted Cruz in the primary and Cruz won TX. Trump wasn't in my top 10 but in the end he was the only one that could and did beat Broom Hilda. And Mousey has been butt hurt ever since. I find it funny that I live rent free in Mousey's head these days.

LMAO!!! Cal, you know better than that!! FM seems to have lost his spunk in sparring with me (since I slap him around like a little girl in those spars) so he is trying to antagonize others with his usual baiting and circular arguments that mean absolutely nothing.

I just skip right past his posts and do not waste any time reading his dribble.