171745: If a person fasts in expiation for breaking an oath, does he have to feed poor people if he becomes able to afford it after that?

A young person made an oath not to masturbate ever, but Allah forgive but he broke it and repented and offered the expiation by fasting 3 days because he didnt have the money to do the other things for expiation. His question is does this cancel the oath now totally, or does the oath gets renewed automatically since the oath was made that he will not do a certain action ever, considering that fact after breaking the oath he only repented and offered the expiation and did not utter the oath again. What should he do now, does he HAVE to renew the oath again or can he not and if he does commits the sin again will it be just regarded as a sin and require repentance only and not expiation?.

Praise be to Allaah.

Firstly:

Masturbation
is haraam; we have previously discussed the ruling on it and how to deal
with that in the answer to question
329.

Secondly:

The
expiation for breaking an oath is explained in the verse in which Allah, may
He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Allah
will not punish you for what is uninentional in your oaths, but He will
punish you for your deliberate oaths; for its expiation (a deliberate oath)
feed ten Masakin (poor persons), on a scale of the average of that with
which you feed your own families; or clothe them; or manumit a slave. But
whosoever cannot afford (that), then he should fast for three days. That is
the expiation for the oaths when you have sworn. And protect your oaths
(i.e. do not swear much). Thus Allah make clear to you His Ayat (proofs,
evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) that you may be
grateful”

[al-Maa’idah
5:89].

So the
individual has the choice between three things: feeding ten poor persons or
clothing them or freeing a slave. If he cannot do any of these things, then
he moves to the option of fasting, so he should fast three days.

Thirdly:

If a person
is unable to do any of these three things, so he fasts three days instead,
then after that he has enough money to do one of these three acts of
expiation, his fasting is still sufficient and he does not have to resort to
any of these options. This is the view of the majority of scholars. So if he
had started the fast then things became easier for him and he could afford
to feed poor people after he had started the fast, he does not need to go
back to the option of feeding poor persons, so this is even more appropriate
in the case of one who fasted and has finished the fasts. Ibn Qudaamah said:
If he has started to fast, then he becomes able to free a slave or feed or
clothe poor persons, he does not have to go back to those options. That was
narrated from al-Hasan and Qataadah, and it was the view of Maalik,
ash-Shaafa‘i, Ishaaq, Abu Thawr and Ibn al-Mundhir. … Because it is an
alternative and it is not invalidated by becoming able to do the action to
which it was an alternative. So he does not have to go back to the first
option after starting it. Similarly, if a person who is doing Hajj tamattu‘
and cannot afford a sacrificial animal has started to fast the seven days,
he cannot change his mind about that, and there is no scholarly difference
of opinion concerning that.

End quote
from al-Mughni by Ibn Qudaamah, 10/22

Based on
that, your fast is sufficient as expiation and cancels out the oath. Then if
you repeat the act of masturbation which you have sworn not to do, you do
not have to offer expiation unless you had renewed the oath and uttered it,
then broken it.