So far on my first day testing the new AIO however, I have at least reported by my DAW the exact same latency. I am going to do further testing, after all it's only day one here, however I am a little surprised so far. Perhaps there's something I'm missing in setting things up or how this works?

Re: No Reported Latency Difference between 9632 and AIO

Over the years the driver's lowest buffer size was changed from 64 to 32 samples (the 9632 manual is older). The values listed as 'latency' equal the mathematical value of buffer size to sample rate. These values were also shown in the Settings dialog. The total round trip latency is of course different. That is explained in the chapter about Latency and Monitoring (AD/DA converter latency etc).

Re: No Reported Latency Difference between 9632 and AIO

MC wrote:

Over the years the driver's lowest buffer size was changed from 64 to 32 samples (the 9632 manual is older). The values listed as 'latency' equal the mathematical value of buffer size to sample rate. These values were also shown in the Settings dialog. The total round trip latency is of course different. That is explained in the chapter about Latency and Monitoring (AD/DA converter latency etc).

So The PCI 9632 old interface and PCI-E AIO inteface having the same preformance?