Saturday, April 08, 2017

The ironic thing is that there will be more than a few people who will be far more offended by this meme than by what has been done to the Swedish nation by their own government.Deliver our nation from immigration.Deliver our people from invasion.Deliver us from Arab, Black, and Asian.St. Breivik, pray for us.

Question: If the God-Emperor bombed Syria because the Syrian government killed Syrian kids with gas, shouldn't he bomb Sweden since the Swedish government killed Swedish kids with Muslim truck drivers?

3/17/2017: "Erdogan Has Just Declared He Intends To Have Muslims Invade Christian Europe In The Future And That Turkey Will Build Nuclear Bombs To Soon Attack The Christian West To Subjugate The Church"

"I am calling out to my citizens, my brothers and sisters in Europe,” Erdoğan said at a rally in the Central Anatolian province of Eskişehir on March 17. “Have not just three but five children.”

Why adopt the progressive policy of not publishing images of the results of vibrant immigration? It's hard to not be affected after seeing such images, and one can never forget. An ignorant public is a public that will tolerate genocidal immigration policies.

Because gore images are easily accessible to anyone who wants to satisfy their perverted cravings. Head to /r/syriancivilwar and keep that shit out of here. I am not offended by images of gore but I don't like to see them while I am mingling with my family.

Pictures too rough tend to backfire. They're painful, so you look away. Notice how they did the Syrian Propaganda pictures. Nasty but not too nasty. Sympathy & desire to help vs looking away in pain. I saw the pictures crop up on Gab yesterday. I'm quite down for the Deus Vult, but those pictures are brutal.

@1 Just another commenter

Details got lost over even a short period of time. Invocations of St. Thomas should join soon as well.

Swedes, get off your butts already. Last night another jihad? It's time to throw of the EU minded idiots running the place. Unite behind the king to drive the invaders out. That is your duty. If the current king won't do it, find one who will.

Concerning the woman in Sweden who was cut in half...I wonder, if she was Swedish, which political party has she been voting for. Was she voting for the political parties that welcome the muslim invaders? What about her family. Now that she was literally cut in half, which political party will her family now vote?

If she was a leftist, I'll guess that her family will keep on voting for open borders Swedish leftist parties. According to current leftist ideology, it can never be the fault of non-whites, since non-whites don't have agency. The Swedish voters will, in a short while, forget about this and keep voting for open borders, pro muslim political parties.

There have been swedish men and women who have spoken up and they are promptly attacked by the Swedish government with threats of hate speech and various other criminal offenses.

Until the economy blows up very few people can risk their career/job and hence their ability to feed and support themselves and their family to speak out against the government.Those that have tried to speak out habe been attacked and ostracized by the Swedish zombie hordes.

The images such asthe woman\girl torn in half will be a rallying point once the economies of the west falter and the killing starts. Those brutal images will steel the hearts and minds of the native whites as they return the violence 100 fold upon the brown hordes.There are but a handful who are awake and realize the pain and death that is coming could have been largely mitigated. Most people are unable or unwilling to challenge their own world view at any given time and see what's actually before them.

As DC said the other day, we are but ants gloating on a leaf in the river of history. Some of us look around, most refuse to do so.

In some ways Brievik is revolutionary who simply came before his time.

We haven't seen the whites of the west engage in unrestrained violence in a very long time. I suspect even the brown hordes will be shocked at the level of brutality coming at them once the social mood breaks and whites openly turn on the brown hordes.

Hatred is not evil - it is a natural reaction to that which is antithetical and threatening to our own nature.

OTOH, where are the anti-greed laws? If we spent as much time and effort harassing the naturally greedy people as we did hunting down the naturally hateful people I think the world might be a better place. Hate requires provocation and proximity to act.

@22During King Phillips War the level of brutality on the part of the colonists towards the natives was so horrific the Naragansett who wanted to sit the war out - were forced to take sides. ( against the colonists) When whites want to win a war history has shown they are generally successful.

The people who'd be offended about this should be wondering how it is that Breivik could get only 21 years in prison.

If the ACLU had its way, the three killers of James Byrd would only have gotten 30 years instead of death. They'd be out just a few years before Breivik. And during those 30 years, the three would also get Michael Dukakis-style furloughs.

They still have a long path to go. Next step, they will torture her instead of her animals.

Farmers are isolated and a easy prey for a group. In South Africa they have been torturing and killing farmers for years (there was even a trendy thing about boiling them alive), and the answer from the government was to take their weapons. Yeap, farmers being killed and the government disarmed them to avoid gunfights when their farm is attacked.

Anyway, US is very close to that point. Next Democrat government after-Trump is likely to be fully non-white, and the first they'll do is to disarm white people.

Grayman wrote:We haven't seen the whites of the west engage in unrestrained violence in a very long time. I suspect even the brown hordes will be shocked at the level of brutality coming at them once the social mood breaks and whites openly turn on the brown hordes.

There are none so capable of savagery as those who have decided to put savagery behind them in virtue of having known it's heart.

@30 Rodger While I agree that it's possible that the best game of 4d chess Trump played was against his supporters, I wouldn't go so far as to say that nothing Vox says should be taken seriously.

He already said he didn't necessarily support the missile strike, and that he would only do so if a theory was confirmed that this strike was done for reasons that wouldn't get us deeper into M.E. conflict or war with Russia.

We ALL were "riding" Trump because A- it was fun and B- he said many of the right things. Skepticism and distrust at the moment are normal reactions, but there isn't sufficient evidence yet for making a claim that he's 100% a neocon and we've all been hoodwinked.

We're pulling the emergency stop cord in the Trump Train because a small fire has started. Be prepared to jump off if , but don't do it yet.

Deadmau5 Patton wrote:We're pulling the emergency stop cord in the Trump Train because a small fire has started.Really? You think you can stop the Trump Train. This fucker's GOT NO BRAKES, you whiny bitch. Get off the train and go away or sit down and enjoy the ride. It ain't stopping for you.You're standing there with the cut end of the stop cord in one hand and your dick in the other, wondering why nobody thinks you're as smart as you obviously are.

Mr Darcy wrote:Trump has betrayed us. I''m astonished that intelligent observers cannot see that.No, you're betraying Trump, and us. I'm not at all surprised a winy effeminate bitch like you can't see it.

Question: If the God-Emperor bombed Syria because the Syrian government killed Syrian kids with gas, shouldn't he bomb Sweden since the Swedish government killed Swedish kids with Muslim truck drivers?

@22 GraymanWe haven't seen the whites of the west engage in unrestrained violence in a very long time.

Funny coincidence, just about 100 years ago the US joined in the happy funtime of World War 1. That was a war with very little restraint. But there was still the Geneva convention and the Hague convention observed to some degree.

Might have to go back further, to the Boer war and the US pacification of the Philippines to see less restraint. But even there, the dogs of war were not totally off the leash.

Might have to go back to the 17th century, to the 30 Years War in central Europe & the English versions, to really find "no holds barred, no deed too foul". By some odd coincidence, those were religious wars, fought within the Hajnal line.

If the Ummah wants to re-run the Vienna Road Show, either 1529 or 1683, there's a price for that ticket.

"Question: If the God-Emperor bombed Syria because the Syrian government killed Syrian kids with gas, shouldn't he bomb Sweden since the Swedish government killed Swedish kids with Muslim truck drivers?"

I like to argue that there's more reason to invade Sweden and depose our government that it ever was to invade Iraq.

Since we actually give material support terrorism, to the tune of at least a couple of million dollars in welfare money to full time terrorists a year. And we are the largest base of terrorists in Europe. Sweden is directly responsible for hundreds of killings commited by people we've given citizenship to and money to travel which they've used to travel to Syria and Somalia, with our knowledge. When they become invalids they return to Sweden for free care and a healthy pension.

Certainly I wouldn't mind getting invaded for the ongoing genocide against Swedes either. Any reason to take power from the current bunch of traitors is good enough for me.

Ah, I forgot all about the colonial wars against the Indian nations, where the English colonists learned to really fight. Nothing says "war" like burning a village to the ground in the middle of winter, and taking or destroying all the stored food. Wonder where my copy of Northwest Passage has gotten to?

"Yeah, I just talked to a friend I haven't seen in ten years. He said that Sweden is our biggest national security problem in his opinion, having regularly stayed there due to work."

Can't really disagree strongly. Though I'd probably be more concerned about the actual and metaphorical Swedes behind the gates than the Swedes and "Swedes" in front of the gates. At least I assume that the Swedes in Finland dominate the traitor class and poz vendors.

"He said that he has personally witnessed at the border, how it flows like, and I quote, "river of shit"."

Vox: "Question: If the God-Emperor bombed Syria because the Syrian government killed Syrian kids with gas, shouldn't he bomb Sweden since the Swedish government killed Swedish kids with Muslim truck drivers?"

This hard rationality is what I come here to read and always return for.

Some days it looks like the Onion is making the major news organ's press releases.... Hmmm.... I wonder....

How would the press report an islamic terrorist bombing at a gay nightclub in Rome, if a dozen or two active Catholic priests died in the event, some even being caught in flagrante delicto by the blast/gunfire? They can't cover it because it violates the dominating "religion of peace" narrative, but they can't not cover it because gays were hurt and they never miss a chance to point out Church Hypocrisy!!! I can see a lot of ways the media, the Church, the left, gays, and criminal apologists could tie themselves in knots figuring spin, and nobody wanting to make the first moves. But their refusal to offer 24x7 coverage to such an event would be seen as agenda and spin in itself, so memes would flood out to wash across the social media.

In order to join the Church of St. Breivik, you have to answer the following questions:

(From 2083....still available online)

2.21 Questions and polls your government and news agencies have disallowedAsk yourself, why haven’t the following polls and questions been raised and presented toEuropeans?1. Do you support mass Muslim immigration?2. Do you support the Islamisation of Europe?3. Do you trust your government’s statistics provided and their intentions in regards to massMuslim immigration?4. Do you support the implementation of the EU’s Eurabia project?5. Do you want Europe to merge with the Islamic world?6. Do you see the Islamisation as a threat to European cultures and to the future stability ofEurope?7. Do you support the building of mosques in Europe as long as it is illegal to build Churchesin Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries?8. Would you support expelling Muslims if it was proven that they preached hate orintolerance towards non-Muslims?9. Would you support revoking citizenship of Muslims if it was proved that they acted hatefultowards and conspiring against non-Muslims?10. Would you support your government and military if they attempted to stop the currentIslamic demographic warfare (through mass Muslim immigration and average birth rates of3-4) being waged on Europe by the Global Islamic Ummah?11. Would you support the deportation of Muslims from Europe if it was proved that they wereinvolved in Islamic demographic warfare (through mass Muslim immigration and averagebirth rates of 3-4) against Europe?12. Would you support the creation of armed resistance groups if it was proven that yourgovernment and other elected officials conspired against the people by implementing anideology (multiculturalism) whose purpose is the eradication of European culture,traditions, European identity, Christendom (cultural genocide) and by allowing Islamicdemographic warfare (indirect genocide of Europeans)?13. Would you support pre-emptive strikes initiated by these armed resistance groups againstyour government if it was proven that they (and the majority of parliament) conspiredagainst the people by implementing an ideology whose purpose is the eradication ofEuropean culture (cultural genocide) and by allowing Islamic demographic warfare (indirectgenocide of Europeans)?

This is what really aggravates me about these European countries with kings. What the fuck are these people doing? Do they know they'll be beheaded and put on likes at some point?

They're not real kings. They're constitutional monarchs. And constitutional monarchy is a nonsensical notion. You're either king by the Grace of God or you're not a king. If you're a king by Act of Parliament or by some clause in the Constitution then you're no king. You're just a useless overpaid civil servant, a worthless parasite serving as a figurehead for the elites. Like Elizabeth II.

A constitutional monarchy is the ideal form of government for a totally cucked society.

dfordoom wrote:They're not real kings. They're constitutional monarchs. And constitutional monarchy is a nonsensical notion. You're either king by the Grace of God or you're not a king. If you're a king by Act of Parliament or by some clause in the Constitution then you're no king. You're just a useless overpaid civil servant, a worthless parasite serving as a figurehead for the elites. Like Elizabeth II.

It is a way to have a head of state that represents the people as a whole, and not a political party, like in the USA. That way, you do not turn a political operative into a God, like Americans do with their presidents.

White people already are disarmed. They're disarmed morally, spiritually and psychologically. At this point in time all the guns in the world ain't gonna help.

White people can't be saved unless they start to realise that shiny consumer goods, reality TV, facebook , comic book movies and porn aren't enough to sustain a civilisation. There is no sign whatsoever that white people are going to realise this in time.

Guns are irrelevant. The Confederacy had guns. Remind me again how that worked out for them.

Grayman wrote:We haven't seen the whites of the west engage in unrestrained violence in a very long time. I suspect even the brown hordes will be shocked at the level of brutality coming at them once the social mood breaks and whites openly turn on the brown hordes.

I had for some time thought that our heritage blacks (as I call them) could remain part of America. But so many are so blatantly anti-white, so much hate against us, even the copacetic ones won't be allowed to stay.

Because everyone's friend's son could revert to their ancestral mean, the mass sentiment will be that the family must go. No exceptions.

Intersectionalism = Rape Culture

They literally *all* have to go back.

P.S. Oh also it occurred to me that the turn in sentiment could even result in conquering Mexico and Canada as walled-off satrapies, for security, to control access to the continent.

I have heard faggots saying that we might have to send troops to Europe to protect moslems from consequences.

It's not difficult to imagine American globalists and SJWs uniting behind a push for regime change in any European country that was wicked enough to elect the wrong government (such as the French hypothetically electing Le Pen).

It would start with the usual destabilising tactics and economic sanctions. The American media would point out that the said European country had elected Literally Hitler and would demand that something be done For the Sake of the Children.

If sanctions didn't work there would be pressure for air strikes, and then for American boots on the ground.

History shows that the United States has no qualms whatsoever about bombing or invading white countries.

We haven't seen the whites of the west engage in unrestrained violence in a very long time.

Funny coincidence, just about 100 years ago the US joined in the happy funtime of World War 1. That was a war with very little restraint. But there was still the Geneva convention and the Hague convention observed to some degree.

Might have to go back further, to the Boer war and the US pacification of the Philippines to see less restraint. But even there, the dogs of war were not totally off the leash.

Might have to go back to the 17th century, to the 30 Years War in central Europe & the English versions, to really find "no holds barred, no deed too foul". By some odd coincidence, those were religious wars, fought within the Hajnal line.

If the Ummah wants to re-run the Vienna Road Show, either 1529 or 1683, there's a price for that ticket.

Last time all out war was waged in Europe, thinking the 30's years war here something like half the population of what would be Germany died . I'm thinking it was like 70% of the men. It was so bad polygamy was permitted in some areas for a time and men were restricted to taking the Priesthood till 60

As for invading Europe to stop the far right, of course we would . The only way to stop that would be either Russian intervention or the US being simply unable to function militarily

Upside we aren't that far out from there, our nukes probably won't work in a couple of decades at current rate and once that happens, basically we go home or are ended at our enemies leisure.

An economic collapse would also do the trick but we've been able to keep that way simply because we are needed as an export market. Everyone produces too much of the wrong stuff right now and wants to push its surplus on someone else.

Optionally the upcoming highly probable civil war will end the US as a threat to or guarantor of or whatever other things in combo of work peace , we won't have the manpower or resources for jack after that.

Its really a timing game, go to soon and we pull a Wesley Clark 2.0 , too late and its damned hard.

As for invading Europe to stop the far right, of course we would . The only way to stop that would be either Russian intervention or the US being simply unable to function militarily

Of course it would be interesting if the "far right" got elected in France and the US decided on regime change. After all France is a nuclear power, and a nuclear power with an actual credible nuclear deterrence capability.

And if the FN did gain power in France their obvious first step would be a military alliance with Russia. A revival of the Entente Cordiale.

It must surely by now be becoming obvious that any nation that has not developed a nuclear deterrent has made a very very serious error. Countries like Germany, Japan and Australia may well find this out over the course of the next decade or so.

32 I understand, I must support POTUS, I'm giving these matters time but I understand the issues/criticisms at hand (to some degree.)

37 What? Vox outgrew mensa, didn't need them and is probably smarter than them. Others here are very smart people, Vox to others are worth reading,linking to, buying items, supporting their efforts provided the blog rules are abided by, its our hosts or the Day's and admins platform or playground to flesh out ideas, teach, explain matters and offer insights we are not going to find anywhere else.

Japan has both the tech base (and, far more than likely, all of the designs) to go nuclear in 2-3 years. Germany would need to buy the launch platform base. Aussies probably can't do much about it.

As for France, I think people forget that they've got a right nasty Intel service with a long history of telling everyone else to piss off. France is mostly unlikely to align with anyone else for very long. (Post WW2 to now might also be the longest we've all gone without shooting at them.)

@68 randkoch

This was a deeply coordinated setup to co-opt Trump, but Trump also seems to have realized that rather quickly. Though the thing that's becoming more clear, to my mind, is the real trap was something we couldn't have known (but Intel services would). McMaster's words, especially are important.

"And then there were also measures put in place to avoid hitting what we believe is a storage of sarin gas there so that that would not be ignited and cause a hazard to civilians or anyone else."

That was the trap. All of the major Intel services would have that information. It's the reason why an extremely detailed attack plan was previously laid out for the air base. If Trump does nothing, that information leaks like a sieve, then you get "Trump doesn't respond to DEAD CHILDREN!". See now why they went with the Ivanka/Dead Children route?

I also think the "dead children" being normalized for military response has issues it's going to cause, but it can be strategically deployed as well. (Some of the Pro-Life campaigners should really get started on exploiting this against the Media. Just saying.) But Trump was able to short-circuit their use of it and defuse the situation, for the most part, for now. Remember, Trump "did something". You can't say he didn't and now everyone around the world is praising him for it. That cuts two full news cycles short and forces Trump's adversaries to praise him.

Also, has anyone found the full statement by the Government of Syria? I can only find quotes, but I've yet to see a denial of there being chemical weapons at the base itself.

Re: Stockholm terror attack. Articles quoting witness accounts that there were police helicopters circling over the area an hour before the attack have now been scrubbed. Witness accounts that report seeing people shooting at the crowd at two separate locations in Stockholm are now gone. What is going on? I have no idea.

How did the driver who crashed into a wall got out of his truck and traveled by public transportation to a distant suburb? It sounds strange.

Markku wrote:I currently have serious doubts about Trump, but defeatcucks crawling from under their rocks doesn't exactly make me more inclined to pull the trigger on it.

These defeatcucks are having the opposite effect on me too. The more they post the more I'm inclined to dismiss any doubts I may be feeling at the moment. As has been said very often here, when you start getting flack you're over the target.

Any doubts I have are being assuaged by the sheer volume of those demanding we disavow Trump.

Besides, what good would it do to embrace defeat now? We're only a few months into the God Emperor's reign. As good as he is, even he needs time to drain the swamp and accomplish our goals.

As our host said prior to the election even if all President Trump does is build the wall and defend the second amendment he'll have been an improvement over all the rest and delay the coming collapse. Instead since this election we've seen a massive shift in the culture and things that I had thought could never be walked back in less than a few decades have changed within a matter of weeks. Why should any of us start doubting his ability to play 4D chess now?

The defeatcucks have failed. They've been consistently wrong this whole time, why should any of us start listening to them now?

@89We are not racists in Sweden. We just want people to follow the law.

Well, there's your problem. What you call "follow the law" and what some Afghan goat herder or Somali gunman means by "follow the law" aren't the same thing.

Your denial of the reality of genetics makes it impossible for you to see what colonization of Sweden is doing. It is destroying your nation, Sweden. Also it may be creating more Breiviks. When young Swedish men finally realize how badly their own national leaders have sold them out some sort of reckoning is likely to occur. A reckoning that will make Breivik look measured, controlled, and sane by comparison.

This is not something I would want for any country, even one that has walked away from Truth as Sweden has. But it is something that looms ever closer, with every murderous evil committed by the Islamic colonists who are destroying your nation.

I have a friend in Stockholm. We've been going back-and-forth on Facebook messages about what's happening in Sweden. He's been in total denial that there's any problem with Muslims and immigrants in Sweden. I almost every other day send him links to Muslim atrocities happening in Sweden. He's tells me it's fake news and everything is hunky-dory. With this latest truck attack he said it wasn't confirm that what it was a Muslim who perpetrated this attack. They had released the name of the driver. I told him the name for sure was Mohammed or akhbar or something to that effect. He hasn't responded to me yet. Which is very very unusual. He's always answering back that no there's no problem here in Sweden. I told him that if he wants we would be happy to have a move to United States. I have haven't heard back from him yet. I think he finally gets it.