Isn’t it strange that some pathogens are popularized and sensationalized while countless other pathogens that exhibit similar symptoms are left unadvertised? Many of the pathogens that we are told to fear (like rotavirus, measles, chickenpox and polio) really only manifest as benign infections in a healthy body. Infections can be prevented altogether or effectively overcome with proper hydration, strong cellular energy, antioxidants, phyto-nutrients, and a healthy microbiome powered by prebiotics.

The diseases promoted in the media are the ones the pharmaceutical companies and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have selected and isolated to capitalize on and sell vaccines for. Isn’t it strange that “lifesaving vaccine science” is applied to only some over-hyped pathogens, while countless other pathogens that exhibit similar symptoms are left un-popularized?

Out of the many pathogens that exist in our world, isn’t it strange that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control has singled out potentially benign rotavirus infections as an immediate cause for concern and now they recommend a three-dose vaccine regime for infants on their ever-growing vaccine schedule? Perhaps the co-inventor of the Rotavirus vaccine, Paul Offit, who also advises CDC policy, has found a way to make it look like he is saving lives (even as tens of thousands of testimonies of vaccine damage are submitted annually to the government by parents, caregivers, and doctors.)

Like other similar infections that cause gastroenteritis, rotavirus is readily eliminated through the bowels and often elicits diarrhea. If the body must expel further, then necessary vomiting will occur. A necessary fever may also result as the body works to eliminate the pathogen. The symptoms may resemble an infection from a food-borne pathogen. If the infected host is not replenished with an adequate amount of water, dehydration can occur. Most remarkably, the prebiotic properties of oligosaccharides from human breast milk, honey and plant-based foods effectively fight rotavirus.

Rotavirus infections have become a big business opportunity for vaccine inventors like Paul Offit, who invented RotaTeq, a live-virus vaccine formula that promises protection but actually causes viral shedding and mutated rotavirus strains. In viral shedding, the virus replicates and spreads to others, through human saliva, waste or other excretions. Once the replicated virus is released in the environment and gets in the water supply, it is free to mutate and will pose worse health threats to people long-term, especially to immune-compromised persons. Paul Offit’s needless RotaTeq vaccine is recommended to infants in three doses, at two, four, and six months of age, long before the infant’s immune system has even formed to handle the pathogen, the adjuvant, and chemical cocktail that makes up the vaccines.

While this vaccine invention bolsters Offit’s accolades and helps him steer vaccine policy at the CDC, he is misleading families on what’s most important for rotavirus prevention. Prebiotic foods, specifically oligosaccharides, provide real protection from all pathogens. Oligosaccharides feed the good bacteria in the intestines, bolstering the microbiome’s ability to rapidly respond to all infections. Oligosaccharides also have a direct “effect” on virus material, weakening it.

Scientists at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston tested oligosaccharides from breast milk on two major strains of human rotavirus. “All oligosaccharides substantially reduced the infectivity of both human rotavirus strains in vitro,” wrote lead researcher Professor Sasirekha Ramani. The researcher explained that breastfed infants are automatically protected from rotavirus and believe that these oligosaccharides can be added to infant formula for infants who aren’t fed breast milk.

The oligosaccharides were applied in concentrations of 2.5 mg/ml and 5 mg/ml. The higher concentration was more effective. Even after infection, the specific oligosaccharide 2’FL was 62 percent effective in eliminating infectivity. A combination of two oligosaccharides were more effective (73 prcent) than by themselves for eliminating infectivity of a prominent rotavirus strain.Parents who don’t want to burden their children’s bodies with toxic aluminum and formaldehyde-based vaccines or turn their child into a virus shedder, should understand that healthy breast milk and prebiotic-rich foods are most important for rotavirus prevention.Sources include:NutraIngredients.comMedlinePlus.govNaturalNews.comNaturalNews.comNCBI.NLM.NIH.gov

An important study from the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia utilized immunohistochemistry to investigate the effects of aluminum hydroxide injections on the spinal cord and motor cortex of mice. The researchers adjusted the amount of aluminum hydroxide to match the amount that humans receive via vaccination, accounting for weight and blood volume of the mice.

Mice that were treated with aluminum hydroxide suffered from significantly increased apoptosis of motor neurons. They also experienced increases in reactive astrocytes and microglial proliferations within their spinal cord and cortex.

The aluminum was also detected in the cytoplasm of motor neurons, suggesting that the aluminum cations infiltrate the cell and cause damage long term. Some of the neurons also tested positive for hyper-phosphoylated tau protein, an indicator of impending neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia.

When the amount of aluminum hydroxide was increased to six doses, the mice showed significant impairments in motor function and loss of spatial memory capacity. The researchers warn against the toxicity of aluminum hydroxide in vaccination and suggest “greater scrutiny by the scientific community.”

Many of the same neurological deficits are showing up in vaccinated populations. Gulf War Syndrome is a nickname for motor neuron disease that showed up after veterans were heavily vaccinated with aluminum hydroxide from anthrax vaccines and other vaccines.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or Lou Gehrig's Disease, is also defined by motor neuron degeneration and cognitive dysfunction. The damage seen in ALS is the same damage that the researchers found when aluminum hydroxide was injected. Because the aluminum cations can uptake into the cytoplasm of cells, they can cause unpredictable damage to certain areas of the body.

If vaccines get the credit for saving lives and reducing infant mortality, why have the number of sudden infant deaths raised dramatically since the introduction of multiple vaccines? Why does the US have the worst infant mortality rate compared to all other developed Nations? There are 33 developed Nations that have better infant mortality rates than the US. These Nations also have less cumbersome vaccination schedules for vulnerable infants.

A 2011 study published in Human and Experimental Toxicology finds that infant mortality rates regressed against the number of vaccine doses routinely given. The study asks, “Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?”

The U.S. CDC’s current vaccine recommendation for US children is 26 doses for infants less than one year of age. This is the most rigorous vaccine schedule in the world. The researchers in this study used linear regression to examine the immunization schedules and infant mortality rates of the thirty-four developed Nations. The average infant mortality rate for each nation was calculated for five different groups: those that recommended 12-14 vaccine doses, 15-17, 18-20, 21-23, and 24-26 doses. There was a statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.

Infant mortality rate is defined as the number of infant deaths per 1000 live births. The infant mortality rate for the US is an abysmal 6.22. Singapore, Sweden, and Japan have an infant mortality rate that is less than half that of the US (2.80).

There were major differences in infant mortality for nations that gave 12-14 doses compared to those that gave 21-23 and 24-26 doses. As of 2009, The top five nations require only 12 vaccine doses in the infant’s first year, compared to 24 doses required by the US. The researchers warrant that “a closer inspection of correlations between vaccine doses, biochemical or synergistic toxicity and infant mortality rates is essential.”

The study suggests that increasing vaccine use on infants is actually damaging health outcomes and ratcheting up infant mortality rates, negating the health benefits that singular vaccines provided in the past. Of course, vaccines should never receive full credit for reducing infant mortality in the first place. Mortality rates for any disease dropped before vaccines were introduced. Mortality rates for disease have fallen because of better sanitation, increased availability of nutrition, clean water, and easier access to health care. Americans cannot recall a time when city streets were overrun with human and animal waste, which spread disease. American cannot recall a time before chlorine was used to disinfect water supplies, when food borne and water borne pathogens caused severe diarrhea and dehydration. There is now greater access to nutrition than there has ever been. Americans must also thank their ancestors for exposing themselves naturally to viruses such as measles, mumps, and chickenpox, which provided lifelong immunity, higher antibody levels that boosted herd immunity, and conferred disease-resistant traits through breast milk and epi-genetic factors.

The researchers conclude: “It appears that at a certain stage in nations' movement up the socio-economic scale—after the basic necessities for infant survival (proper nutrition, sanitation, clean water, and access to health care) have been met—a counter-intuitive relationship occurs between the number of vaccines given to infants and infant mortality rates: nations with higher (worse) infant mortality rates give their infants, on average, more vaccine doses. This positive correlation, derived from the data, elicits an important inquiry: are some infant deaths associated with over-vaccination?”

Not only are vaccine ingredients impure, (introducing soft metals, carcinogens, antibiotics, excito-toxins and foreign animal and human DNA) but the methodology of rigorous vaccine use carries a whole additional set of risks. The current CDC schedule recommends 49+ vaccine doses before a child reaches six years of age.

This rigorous vaccine schedule forces pathogens into a child’s body without allowing the body's cellular receptors be naturally exposed to the antigens and threats. This changes the way the child’s immune system develops and responds to future threats, perverting how cellular defenses respond and allocate macrophage and lymphocyte response. Vaccine pathogens are introduced directly into the muscle tissue and blood stream. These impure vaccine ingredients enter the bloodstream and circulate to the organs without first being filtered through the immune system’s first line of defense: the mucous membranes, the gastrointestinal tract and other layers of the human microbiome. Vaccine toxins such as aluminum and mercury can even penetrate the blood-brain barrier.Compounding use of multiple vaccines sets the immune system up for long-term failure, causing the body to lose its ability to recognize actual viral and bacterial threats in its environment. This could lead a person to experience sensitivities to the natural environment, which includes all sorts of allergies, allergic rhinitis, and hay fever. This theory is backed up by new findings from epidemiologists at the School of Public Health at Jackson State University. Published in the Journal of Translational Science, this peer-reviewed study was the first of its kind to compare the health outcomes of vaccinated children and unvaccinated children.

3,000 percent increase in allergic rhinitis in vaccinated populations

The researchers compared a broad range of health outcomes in 666 children from home school organizations spanning four states. Thirty-nine percent of the children (ages 6-12) were unvaccinated. The study found five alarming statistics about vaccinated children. Vaccinated children were 4.2 times more likely to be diagnosed on the autism spectrum or with attention deficit and hyperactivity. Learning disabilities are 5.2 times more prevalent in vaccinated children. Eczema was 2.9 times more likely. The most shocking problem facing the vaccinated children was allergic rhinitis. The study documented a 3,000 percent increase of allergic rhinitis in vaccinated children compared to the un-vaccinated group.

Allergic rhinitis is best described as an over-reactive immune response, where the immune system struggles to differentiate viruses and harmful bacteria from natural, benign substances such as pollen or dander. The immune system overreacts by flooding the nasal passages with inflammatory histamines and IgEs. This leads to congested sinuses, sneezing, itchy nose and eyes, sinus pressure, dark circles under the eyes, breathing difficulties, and headaches. Not coincidentally, allergic rhinitis is most common in childhood and adolescence, when the immune system is being bombarded by vaccines. More importantly, as this study shows, vaccinated children are indeed 30 times more likely to have an over-reactive immune system that leads to sinus congestion and breathing difficulties.The increasing number of injections and compounding of doses of vaccine are only overburdening small, developing bodies. The adjuvant in vaccines, usually aluminum salts, is designed to cause inflammation to force the immune system to respond to the pathogen. Continued use of this methodology will inevitably weaken the body’s natural immune response because the first lines of defenses are consistently being bypassed. Increased vaccine use is literally dumbing down the entire immune system by changing the way it recognizes pathogens and how it learns and reacts to them. This inevitably makes the natural, humoral response of the immune system weaker to all pathogens, allowing secondary illness and infection to readily penetrate and overtake the body. This is observed in how quickly an individual is able to overcome a cold virus, for example. Where some infections are destroyed in 24 hours, others may experience symptoms for weeks in the throat, sinus cavities, and chest.

Vaccines not working as intended, evidenced by "no significant difference" in disease rates between vaccinated and un-vaccinated

The Jackson State scientists also found statistics that point to the ineffectiveness of multiple vaccines. While the unvaccinated children had higher incidences of chicken pox (7.9 percent vs. 25.3 percent), and pertussis, (2.5 percent vs. 8.4 percent), there were no significant differences in rates of hepatitis A or B, influenza, meningitis, rotavirus, measles, mumps, or rubella. Even sadder, preterm babies who are vaccinated are 6.6 times more likely to suffer from neurodevelopmental disorders. (Preterm birth itself was not associated with neurodevelopmental disorders.)Vaccines are morbidly overused and consistently cause more harm than good. They should be saved for use only in acute situations to help people prepare for life threatening outbreaks. An illness doesn’t have to be life threatening if children’s bodies were powered by adequate nutrition, not overburdened by toxic elements, and received immunoglobulins passed to them via nutritious breast milk. Natural exposure to pathogens allows the humoral immune system, adaptive response, microbiome, mucous membranes, and gastrointestinal system to exercise, improve, strengthen, and mature, to prepare for greater issues in the future. In order for vaccines to be more effective, impurities such as aluminum, MSG, formaldehyde, mercury and others should be removed, but equally important, vaccines shouldn’t be abused. The higher rates of neuro-development disorders in children today only scream out that there is a problem with the way we are over-vaccinating, over-medicating, and starving children of nutrition.

A study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases suggests that Americans need re-vaccinated with MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) at least twice every year in order to make up for waning measles antibody titters in their blood. This conclusion was reached after the researchers investigated and compared measles virus antibody titers in blood plasma donors who did not vaccinate with MMR, who partially vaccinated, or who completely complied with today's CDC recommendations for MMR.

Un-vaccinated individuals have greater levels of measles antibodies in their blood

Those who weren’t vaccinated with the MMR shot, who were naturally exposed to measles, possess an average antibody response that is three times greater than those who received one MMR shot.

Most surprisingly, the unvaccinated group who had natural immunity to measles had antibody titer levels that were 8 times greater than those who got two MMR shots.

The study concludes that “measles virus antibody titers are lower in children after vaccination than after natural infection” and wide scale distribution of measles vaccination since 1963 is “believed to have resulted in lower average measles virus antibody titers in the US general population.”

This means herd immunity for measles is suffering because the past generation relied on vaccines that do not elicit a strong enough lymphocyte response. It turns out that natural exposure to measles in a population makes the herd immunity stronger, protecting the most vulnerable in the long run.

Blood and plasma donors who were born after the measles vaccine was unleashed in 1963 are providing waning levels of measles virus antibodies in IVIG preparations. People who receive these blood donations aren’t getting a very strong level of antibodies and they are more at risk to measles today than in the past. The Blood Products Advisory Committee, and the Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association are concerned that blood plasma potency for measles antibodies is no longer sufficient for recipients.

The Food and Drug Administration requires a set amount of antibody titers for measles in donated blood plasma. These levels have consistently decreased since 1963, when the measles vaccine was introduced wide scale to children. In order to make up for the waning level of antibody titers in IVIGs, blood donors were re-vaccinated to try and increase measles virus titer levels. The study included 3312 blood samples, separated into eight cohorts based on the individuals’ date of birth. A neutralization assay was used to detect measles virus antibodies. Increases in antibodies did occur after re-vaccination but they were very short-lived, suggesting that vaccine-dependent individuals need to vaccinate with the MMR at least twice every year to make up for waning antibody levels. Vaccine science has failed the human race.

Study concludes that vaccine-dependent immune systems need re-vaccinated every 150 to 230 days with the MMR shot to keep antibody levels up

US plasma donations show a consistent titer decrease for measles antibodies over 59 years. Those born after 1968, who received measles vaccine once, had three times less measles virus antibody concentrations when compared to those born before 1962 who were naturally exposed to measles. Those born after 1990 who had two measles vaccinations, had the fewest antibody titers.

When the blood donors were re-vaccinated in the study, their antibody levels for measles doubled in the first day, but the increase was short-lived. After 150 to 230 days, their antibody levels had fallen to the amount before vaccination. Those who depend on vaccines for immunity will need to re-vaccinate twice every year in order to sustain measles virus antibody titers. This kind of vaccine dependence is not a sustainable model for immunity. Waning vaccine-augmented immunity is giving the population a false sense of security and contributing to weakened herd immunity, putting the most vulnerable at risk.

As vaccine science noticeably fails human immune systems over the last 60 years, it has become evident that natural exposure to viruses is the only way to confer adequate antibody levels and lifelong immunity.

Vaccine injury is reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Center (VAERS) so frequently, that there aren’t enough resources to adequately respond to each case and compensate those who are legitimately harmed and killed by the vaccine. In 2016, there were 59,711 vaccine injuries reported to the government, which included 432 deaths. If any other product did this kind of damage, it would be swiftly recalled, and the manufacturer would be held liable. Not in the case of holy vaccines, which are exempt from legal liability.

Since 1986, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was required by law to study vaccine safety, but now, more than thirty years later, HHS admits that no safety studies have been conducted and no surveillance system has been put in place to inform the public of vaccine risk and vaccine injury. HHS now admits that the VAERS system is unreliable because it only captures less than 1% of the total vaccine injuries that are actually taking place. Could the current vaccine schedule be causing 5.9 million vaccine injuries annually?

The 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act gave pharmaceutical companies immunity from liability but it also required the government to conduct vaccine safety tests that were never conducted. “Within 2 years after December 22, 1987, and periodically thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and transmit to the committee on Energy and commerce of the House of Representatives and the committee on Labor and Human Resources of the Senate a report describing the actions taken pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding 2 year period. Subsection (a) requires the jurisdiction of the Secretary to promote the development of childhood vaccines that result in fewer or less serious adverse reactions that those vaccine on the market, and promote refinement of such vaccines. The law also requires the Secretary to make sure improvements are made to the vaccines with respect to manufacturing, processing, testing, labeling, warning, use instructions, distribution, storage, administration, field surveillance, adverse reaction reporting and recall of reactogenic batches of vaccine in order to reduce the risk of adverse reactions to vaccines. HHS was required to report this to Congress every two years.

HHS admitted in court documents that they could “not locate any records,” and the government is currently being sued for not complying with this law and hence putting American children’s lives at risk to dangerous science experiments.

VAERS allows the CDC and the FDA to look for trends that implicate vaccine safety. Negligently, no investigations are conducted into the reports. Only a select few cases of vaccine injury are presented to the Vaccine Court, a payout system setup to compensate families who can provide burden of proof of vaccine damage. All minor and unsubstantiated claims are swept under the rug, as the government continues to ignore their duty to make safer vaccines. Vaccine manufacturers clearly aren’t setting aside enough money to compensate families for vaccine injuries and vaccine injury data is not being taken seriously enough to provide adequate informed consent to parents who are pressured into vaccinating their kid. https://healthimpactnews.com/2018/hhs-sued-for-not-upholding-vaccine-safety-testing-mandated-by-law/https://healthimpactnews.com/2018/hhs-sued-for-not-upholding-vaccine-safety-testing-mandated-by-law/

Vaccines are not always safe and effective. How a person's immune system responds to vaccine depends on several factors. The antigens in the vaccine are accompanied by adjuvant, preservatives, antibiotics, formaldehyde, and diseased animal and human DNA. How the individual immune cells respond to these substances is a mystery. Likewise, how a person's immune cells respond to the antigen in the vaccine may vary, depending on the way the individual's immune cells respond, the state of their microbiome, the neutralization potential of macrophages, cellular communication with disease-resistant genes, and innate cellular receptor response.

We have to listen to those who were injured by vaccines and improve science

Tens of thousands of families have recognized vaccine injury in their child. They alone are proof that vaccines are not always safe and effective. It’s time to start listening to their stories so public health can improve. The more the experts ignore personal testimony, the more vaccines become a divisive topic presenting no long term, individualized solutions. The Department of Health and Human Services receives approximately 45,000 reports of vaccine injury annually but this figure only represents less than 5 percent of the actual number of adverse events (many of which are unidentified, unreported or misunderstood).

Unrecognized immune deficiencies make people susceptible to vaccine injury

Vaccines are not effective for everyone because it's the person’s unique immune system that must recognize and respond to the vaccine antigen. There are several factors at play in this response. This is why individuals who have been diagnosed with immune deficiencies are instructed not to vaccinate. Many more people, (especially babies) have underdeveloped immune systems that don't always respond effectively to the vaccine (especially multiple doses).

Ancestor's herd immunity before vaccination and the activation of disease resistant genes

Everyone’s immune system is different in that it has been exposed to different viral, bacterial, and fungal threats along the way. Additionally, a person’s genes may be more suited to combat a threat that parents of previous generations fought off and gained immunity to. Disease-resistant genes are passed on epic-genetically from one generation to the next, making sure that the young do not have to suffer from viral and bacterial illnesses that the previous generation faced and overcame. This is one of the reasons why mortality and case incidence of disease went down before a vaccine was ever introduced. Ancestors who were naturally infected gained lifelong immunity that was passed down to the next generation through genetics and breast milk (which influences genetic expression in a positive way.) Because of ancestor herd immunity and proper sanitation and clean water, people do not have to fear infections that once had high mortality rates.

Notwithstanding, the efficiencies and inefficiencies of cellular functions within the individual can make one person more susceptible to infection, more severe symptoms, and a longer duration of illness. Vaccination does not account for the state of the person’s cellular health. In fact, the additional components of a vaccine may hinder the body’s cell cycles, cell survival, and ATP energy production.

Innate immune receptor respone is a factor

The receptor molecules on the surface of all cells are constantly conducting surveillance of their environment, learning about antigens in real time so the cells can adapt and communicate about potential threats. Essentially all cells have receptor molecules on the surface of cells that survey their environment and present antigens to the immune system.

The immune system may not react well to vaccine antigens that are suddenly injected past these initial alarm systems of the immune receptors. The immune receptors of the cells have learned to survey its environment over time, so a sudden breach into the bloodstream can shock the immune system and change the way immune cells respond to the vaccine antigen and to future threats.

Another factor is how cells interact with the unique genetic code of the individual. Immune cells read the environment through their receptors so they can adapt and modify how they utilize these genes, which are encoded by their DNA. Because some gene groups are switched on and some are switched off, the cell types must be flexible in how they deal with an infection. These genetic codes, passed on from parental immune systems to help the next generation adapt, can change the cytokines that cells secrete, can change the pattern of receptors on the surface of the cell, and can change how resistant the cell is to infection. If the individual gives the cells and the genes the right nutritional instructions, they can become more resilient toward any infections. Immune cells may be instructed to stay at a specific location because of information from the environment. Nutrition can assist the immune system to communicate with genes in a way to bolster innate immune defenses. On the contrary, the intrusive way vaccines introduce antigens can change how the immune system allocates its defense resources and learns about its environment. Vaccines do not contain any nutritional instructions to help the cells communicate with the genes to convey stronger resistance.

Six very important studies have found Thimerosal to be a risk factor for tics and another seven scientific studies have found thimerosal exposure to cause speech delay, language delay, attention deficit disorder, and full blown autism. Thimerosal is still used in some vaccines and therefore these vaccines are definitely not safe.

Instead of acknowledging the 75+ years of research on the dangers of thimerosal, the CDC uses six of their own cherry-picked industry-insider studies to claim that thimerosal is safe. These studies have been debunked by a team of researchers who analyzed the studies. Their research abstract, “Methodological Issues and Evidence of Malfeasance in Research Purporting to Show Thimerosal in Vaccines Is Safe” deals a huge blow to the integrity of the CDC.

25,000 ppb mercury = Concentration of mercury in the Hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth in the U.S., from 1990-2001.25,000 ppb mercury = Concentration of mercury in the Hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth in the U.S., from 1990-2001.

50,000 ppb Mercury = Concentration of mercury in multi-dose DTaP and Haemophilus B vaccine vials, administered 4 times each in the 1990's to children at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 18 months of age.

Vaccines are necessary to justify the CDC’s existence. Owning 56 patents on vaccines, it’s far past time to break up the CDC and create an independent research body dedicated to making vaccines safer, with information on their limitations. According to Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Center, “The CDC has a very hard time investigating in an unbiased way what is happening to our children because of ideological and financial conflicts of interest.”

The Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital and Salford Royal have suspended the use of a medical device that was passing dangerous amounts of aluminum to pediatric patients.

The device is called enFlow and it is used in many hospitals in the UK and US. The device warms fluids to body temperature before they are infused to patients during surgery.

A German team of researchers found out that an electrolyte solution was chemically reacting to the device as it was warmed up. The reaction unleashed aluminum into the solution at 7,000 micrograms per liter. This is hundreds of times above the US Food and Drug Administration’s recommended safe limit of 25 micrograms per liter. Premature babies and young children are at risk of neurological damage if they are exposed to such high levels of aluminum.

As the device is pulled from hospitals, many are now asking, “What about aluminum in vaccines?”

Daptacel (DTaP) contains 320 mcg of aluminum, over twelve times the FDA’s recommended safe limit. Maybe the FDA will raise their safe limit of aluminum to help make the vaccine appear safer?

Infanrix, another brand of (DTaP) contains 625 mcg of aluminum, or 25 times greater than the FDA’s recommended safe limit. Apparently the first DTaP shot is safer than the second, but shouldn’t both of these products have to meet a safety standard below 25 mcg of aluminum?

Even if vaccine manufacturers adhered to this limit, what about the risk of cumulative exposure? Almost every single pediatric vaccine contains aluminum level at least 10 times greater than the FDA’s recommended safe limit! Add each dose up and the burden increases; especially on children’s body’s where the concentration of aluminum remains higher than adults due to children’s low blood volume and body weight. Recombivax (HepB) contains 500 mcg of aluminum and it is inserted into infants on their first day of life. By 18 months, a child may be subject to upwards of 4,925 mcg of aluminum from multiple doses of multiple vaccines.

The worst part might not be the amount of aluminum in each dose or the accumulation of aluminum over time. It’s how the aluminum is being introduced to the body that makes it extremely more toxic. The aluminum is not being processed by the body’s gastrointestinal filters. There are no microbes preventing the aluminum from entering through the gut wall and into the blood stream. The aluminum is inserted directly into the cytoplasm of immune-responsive cells and into the blood, where it circulates freely to the organs and passes the blood brain barrier. Continual exposure to aluminum is stunting the learning and growth abilities of children. Higher concentrations of aluminum are found in the brain of Alzheimer’s patients.

All aluminum-containing vaccines need immediately recalled until a safer adjuvant is developed. If not, then why remove enFlow from hospitals for delivering similar levels of aluminum to pediatric patients?

At the Department of Biology and Biotechnology Center, Utah State University, researchers found something very startling about a majority of autistic children vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. The measles component of the vaccine was directly connected to auto antibodies in the central nervous system.

The researchers investigated 125 autistic children by analyzing their antibody assays using immunoblotting methods. A majority of the autistic children (60 percent) showed something very medically concerning going on inside their blood, something that did not show up at all in the blood of 92 control children in the study.

The immunoblotting analysis revealed the presence of an unusual MMR antibody. This antibody is spurred into existence by the MMR vaccine. It specifically detects a protein of 73-75 kD from the virus particles in the MMR vaccine. The targeted protein band contained measles hemagglutinin (HA) protein but did not contain a measles nucleoprotein or any proteins for rubella or mumps viruses.

In over 90 percent of the cases, the researchers identified a measles antibody-positive autistic serum that was also positive for myelin basic protein auto antibodies, suggesting a strong association between MMR vaccines and the development of central nervous system autoimmunity. The researchers suggest that the evidence strongly supports that the measles component of the MMR vaccine is related to the pathogenesis of autoimmune issues and the onset of neurodevelopment disorders such as autism.

Live Pure News

Editor

Lance D. Johnson, co-founder of Live Pure Body Care, is also the managing editor for all studies represented on this site. Lance D. Johnson has published hundreds of articles for top health news site NaturalNews.com and dozens of other syndicated publications.