...The justification begins, "In view of the dissatisfaction expressed by(HK|Sam) with the decisions reached in this case..." Expressingdissatisfaction for ArbCom should not be a reason for sanction, not evenwhen it's one reason of two. The other reason given is their "lack ofinsight" into their part in the conflict, which is vague and indirect.

Various users agree that these users need ArbCom remedies. But theyshould be sanctioned for something they _did_, not for their opinion ofArbCom. I think it would be better for Wikipedia and for people's trustin ArbCom if you changed that text.

is there anything on me ooooohhh... then again I don't think I ever was even looked at by them, the um, "friendship mafia" kinda got me I think lol, I don't think this place exactly helped but pff I don't care

Regarding SlimVirgin, user:Amalekite posted hername, among others, as a Jewish editor on Stormfront, an antisemiticsite. After she blocked him for it, he set up Wikipedia Review in oraround December 2005. He was soon joined by BlissyU2 and MistressSelina Kyle, both banned editors, who proceeded to speculate that shewas a neo-Nazi pretending to be a Jew, that she wanted to kill Jews,that she was in cahoots with Stormfront, that she should be murderedby the Mossad, that she was a manipulative bitch, that she used theweaknesses of male admins to control them, that she was probably apedophile, and that she was out to destroy Wikipedia and changehistory. They did very little else but discuss her for several months.

This post has been edited by It's the blimp, Frank: Tue 13th September 2011, 12:39am

ack thanks my ctrl+f skills are put to shame eep, sorry, I blame it being past midnight... or something. weird though, I did a search for 'selina' and nothing came up, seems like the 'search within child forums' checkbox option in the advanced search page isn't working, hmm