Elected Officials have "design flaws" in their personalities, like F-35 strike fighter jets and Obamacare!

The F-35 strike fighter jets might have the same design flaws as our Vermont Congressional Delegation and Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin when it comes to designing a state and national health care plan - it doesn't fly right either!

The flawed part is the forward root rib, an aluminum beam at the forward-inboard corner of the wing that supports a fuselage fairing panel on the Joint Strike Fighter’s leading edge flap, according to Lockheed.

REO (Rate Elected Officials) Which one of our Vermont elected officials is most likely to have a flawed forward root rib that will be covered under pre-existing conditions in our new health care plans? Which one has the leading edge flap which is not a covered medical condition because it is considered normal for politicians? (a) Peter Shumlin (b) Peter Welch (c) Patrick Leahy (d) Bernie Sanders

By R. Jeffrey SmithSeptember 17, 2013 The Pentagon failed to supervise the design and construction of its new fleet of F-35 stealth warplanes adequately...

REO (Rate Elected Officials) Which one of our Vermont elected officials is most likely to fail to supervise the design and construction of new health care plans adequately? (a) Peter Shumin (b) Peter Welch (c) Patrick Leahy (d) Bernie Sanders

...The 136-page report, signed by deputy inspector general for policy and oversight Randolph Stone, urged the Pentagon to reasses all the critical safety problems in the advanced aircraft, which can’t fly in thunderstorms, has poor cockpit visibility, and relies on the use of a state-of-the-art helmet that designers are having difficulty getting to work.

... F-35 subcontractor L-3 Communications in Alpharetta, Georgia, which is building the cockpit display system, .. found that the system for calibrating tools — a key to insuring that parts fit together and work properly — “had serious deficiencies,” and that quality control records weren’t properly maintained.

REO (Rate Elected Officials) Which one of our elected officials in Vermont has parts that do not fit together and work properly, and does not maintain quality control records properly? (a) Peter Shumlin (b) Peter Welch (c) Patrick Leahy (d) Bernie Sanders

The office said further it didn’t have the “responsibility or resources” to track the quality of work through Lockheed Martin’s supply chain, which includes five major subcontractors, as the report recommended.

REO (Rate Elected Officials) Which one of our elected officials in Vermont claims to have no "responsibility or resources" to track the quality of work on either our state or national health care system? (a) Peter Shumlin (b) Peter Welch (c) Patrick Leahy (d) Bernie Sanders

...He noted that combat testing — the “most challenging portions” of the testing — isn’t scheduled to begin until 2018.

REO (Rate Elected Officials) Which one of our elected officials in Vermont is most likely to pass into law a health care program which is not scheduled to go into action until AFTER the NEXT general election? (a) Peter Shumlin (b) Peter Welch (c) Patrick Leahy (d) Bernie Sanders

Now, review these points, and ask yourself, is this the military fighter JET you want flying over your house at 1200 miles per hour, doing a full training circle all around the State of Vermont in just minutes, over and over again?

... can’t fly in thunderstorms, has poor cockpit visibility...

... the system for calibrating tools — a key to insuring that parts fit together and work properly — “had serious deficiencies,” and that quality control records weren’t properly maintained.

.. it didn’t have the “responsibility or resources” to track the quality of work through Lockheed Martin’s supply chain, which includes five major subcontractors...

...He noted that combat testing — the “most challenging portions” of the testing — isn’t scheduled to begin until 2018.

...The Joint Fighter Office said in its response that of the 363 corrective actions suggested in the report, 78 percent had been completed as of Monday. The remaining 74 actions, it said, were still being implemented or developed.

Bridge over troubled waters of Lake Champlain, an international body of water, the drinking water reservoir for one-thirs of Vermonters is now threatened by F-35 strike fighter jets which could crash into the peoples' drinking water reservoir from GPS devices giving false signals caused by X-Class solar flares. SDO team say the sun continues to emit solar flares. ...can affect GPS & communciations.

29 Oct 2013 Active region 11875 let loose an X2.3 flare. Strong radio emissions were also measured during this flare. The flare started at 2142 UT (5:42 pm ET) and lasted about 20 minutes. The active region is on the limb (edge) and it rotating out of sight from SDO.

NEWS UPDATE: another! NEW OCT. 29 X-CLASS SOLAR FLARE Our public drinking water supply is at risk, and this health risk is more important right now than all the spying in the world. We are becoming our own worst enemy, creating our own worst health hazards.

Why doesn't U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy learn real fast that the most important communication problem we can have here in Vermont is if F-35 strike fighter jets are based here and they are flying during a sudden and unpredictable X-Class Solar Flare which disrupts GPS and satellite communications so that we are at risk of an F-35 fighter jet crashing into Lake Champlain from which one-third of Vermonters draw their drinking water, or it crashes into a school of children, or it just accidentally drops a targeted smart nuclear bomb on us because "smart" bombs are so stupid that they can be disrupted by an X-Class Solar Flare which can disrupt GPS, and the unintended radiation leak will mean all who survive have to leave Vermont forever.

Where is the guarantee, by the U.S. Airforce, that they can instantaneously replace drinking water for 1/3 of Vermonters who draw their drinking water from Lake Champlain, if an F-35 fighter jet gets it's GPS disrupted by an X-Class Solar Flare and does an emergency fuel dump into Lake Champlain?

Isn't it an act of serious and intentional and willful negligence on the part of the U.S. Air Force to risk the drinking water supply of one-third of the State of Vermont?

Isn't it an act of serious and willful and intentional disregard of public safety for the City of Burlington, VT to conspire with the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy to negligently risk the drinking water supply, a prima facie case of Lake Champlain being a drinking water reservoir for one-third of Vermonters?

oCT. 29, 2013 NASA has just reported another X-class solar flare, and remember, these can disrupt GPS global positioning devices, including GPS devices on F-35 strike fighter jets. Please stop the F-35s from coming to Vermont because they are not safe for our pristine garden, the green adventure we have chosen in life is at risk if we allow the government to destroy it.

SDO team say the sun continues to emit solar flares. No danger to us, but can affect GPS & communciations. 29 Oct 2013

Active region 11875 let loose an X2.3 flare. Strong radio emissions were also measured during this flare. The flare started at 2142 UT (5:42 pm ET) and lasted about 20 minutes. The active region is on the limb (edge) and it rotating out of sight from SDO.

To cover any risk incidents caused by the F-35 strike fighter jets, THE CITY OF BURLINGTON BOUGHT 7 MILLION IN INSURANCE.

WHAT DOES YOUR HOME OWNERS' INSURANCE POLICY COVER IF AN F-35 JET CRASHES ON YOUR HOUSE, OR DROPS A CUTE LITTLE BOMB ON YOUR HOUSE?

We won't live long enough to worry about government surveillance of teenagers cell phone photos of their emerging hormones, or listening to old ladies in Germany discussing their calculus derivations, because U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy is in favor of risking our lives and destroying Vermont by basing F-35 strike fighter jets here which are designed to deploy targeted smart nuclear bombs which can go the wrong way when a Class-X solar flare disrupts their satellite controlled GPS; and so our number one worry is the Russian Roulette Wheel U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy has placed our homes on, like a Monopoly Board, and he's the Player, and we are the ones who will suffer .

I got all excited about the F-35 strike fighter jets when an incredibly, amazingly loud and frightening jet flew over my home in SOUTHERN Vermont, and I ran out of the house and looked up at the sky, then went back inside to search google images of jet photos, and I do believe it was an F-35 or something very close, very dark, and very pointed.

The F-35 strike fighter jet has to go somewhere once it lifts off the ground, and it would only take 7.5 minutes to get from Burlington International Airport to fly over my house in Chester, Vermont 05143. Remember, it flys at 1200 miles per hour, or faster.

F-35 strike fighter jets are designed to deploy targeted smart nuclear bombs, and bombs have been dropped by accident from other jets, and the F-35 fighter jet is still known to have serious design flaws, it doesn't work right yet, so you need to know, does your home owners' insurance policy COVER YOU FOR AN ACCIDENTAL DROP OF A SMART NUCLEAR BOMB FROM AN F-35 STRIKE FIGHTER JET OVER YOUR HOUSE IN VERMONT?

My house is insured by a very popular company that probably provides coverage to the most homes in Vermont.

My new home owners' insurance policy, starting next month, November 2013, has a new number, different than the policy number it has had the past ten years, and some different conditions.

Check your policy for "Nuclear" coverage right now!

Section I - Exclusions

A. We do not insure for loss caused directly or indirectly by any of the following. Such loss is excluded regardless of any other cause or event contributing concurrently or in any sequence to the loss. These exclusions apply whether or not the loss event results in widespread damage or affects a sustantial area.

A 6. War

War includes the following and any consequences of any of the following:

a. Undeclared war, civil war, insurrection, rebellion or revolution;

b. Warlike act by a military force or military personnel; or

c. Destruction, seizure or use for a military purpose.

Discharge of a nuclear weapon will be deemed a warlike act even if accidental.

7. Nuclear Hazard

This Exclusion A.7. pertains to Nuclear Hazard to the extent set forth in N. Nuclear Hazard Clause under Section I - Conditions.

N. Nuclear Hazard Clause

1. "Nuclear Hazard" means any nuclear reaction, radiation, or radioactive contamination, all whether controlled or uncontrolled or however caused, or any consequence of any of these.

2. Loss caused by the nuclear hazard will not be considered loss caused by fire, explosion, or smoke, whether these perils are specifically named in or otherwise included within the Perils Insured Against.

3. This policy does not apply under Section I to loss caused directly or indirectly by nuclear hazard, except that direct loss by fire resulting from the nuclear hazard is covered.

WHAT LOCKHEED MARTIN NEEDS TO THINK ABOUT IS THIS: Let's say for example you wanted a wife, but you could only find one who cooked, or one who was faithful. So, to avoid getting AIDS, you chose the faithful woman and go out to eat at restraunts. Now, apply that logic to creating defense strategies. Instead of having one great big overweight, overloaded machine with too many expectations for one jet, instead, make two jets. Divide the workload, divide the expected performance tasks, some to one jet, some to the other, and, like a woman who is your wife 24 X 7 a and a fast food restraunt which is open 24 X 7, both new jets will work simultaneously in the sky, in the atmosphere, each performing different tasks with the same objectives. That's what the U.S. Air Force and Lockheed Martin need to do: instead of one F-35 strike fighter jet which is too heavy and too overloaded with tasks, strip it down and design TWO jets which will work simultaneously together, soaring together. Try something different and it might work.