Booklet, smooklet, who cares. parents are the ones who should chose. This is just pro-vac fear-mongering propaganda. Study the unvaccinated. See how many develope autism, ADHD, ADD, bi-polar, schizophrenia, anorexia, instead of condemning and treating them like criminals.

Autism, ADHD, ADD, bi-polar, schizophrenia, anorexia and anything else you want to add to the list have never been linked to vaccines, and they all pre date the use of vaccines. What's criminal is people like you using fear mongering about disorders that have strong genetic evidence. You're only here to posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. You're an attention seeker, and every time you posts and then the posts are deleted, proves your intent.The rest of us just sit back and wait as posts of yours disappear.

Autism, ADHD, ADD, bi-polar, schizophrenia, anorexia and anything else you want to add to the list have never been linked to vaccines, and they all pre date the use of vaccines. What's criminal is people like you using fear mongering about disorders that have strong genetic evidence.You're only here to posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. You're an attention seeker, and every time you posts and then the posts are deleted, proves your intent.The rest of us just sit back and wait as posts of yours disappear.

here he goes again, providing more evidence of posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. You're an attention seeker, and every time you posts and then the posts are deleted, proves your intent.The rest of us just sit back and wait as posts of yours disappear

If vaccines were really safe there would be no issue. Everyone knows they aren't safe. Its vaccine makers who make a faulty, fraudulent product, blame them for low vaccination rates, not parents protecting their children.

<quoted text>No, it's anti-vaccine people like you who are to blame for spreading scare stories about vaccines causing things like autism, for which there is no credible evidence. That's why I call you a potential mass murderer.

DUH HAWKINGS. Why do we have vaccine compensation programs? Why have reporting systems like VAERS? Why have there been successful court cases? Have you not heard vaccines have side effects? Side effects aren't necessarily the same for every child and it seems even the irresponsible makers of vaccines can't or won't acknowledge the vastness of vaccine side effect and injury. But the thousands of victims know. They know about being screwed over, ignored, blamed and being called anti-vacs because they claim their child was never the same after a series of vaccines. Thats the real world Steven the 2nd.

Anti vaxxer always use Vaccine Comp Court is evidence. Anti vaxxer expect vaccines to be a perfect medicine. They also misrepresent VAERS. VAERS is a passive reporting system and it states right on the site the reports made are not proof of anything. Anyone can submit a report, multiple reports. That's why it's called a passive reporting system.

This is why people are deemed anti vaxxers, because they spread scare tactics and misrepresent the truth. All medicine has side effects, and individual biology and genetics affects this, as well as ethnic background. An example of this is the H1N1 vaccine and the strange fact that only one country having cases of narcolepsy. Those that narcolepsy occurred carried the narcolepsy gene. So vaccine or contracting the flu virus itself, since they carried the gene, the same result would had happened. But anti vaxxers don't ever tell you that, research it and even if they did research it, they deny the evidence of that gene.

So when one reads VAERS or Vaccine Comp Court cases, most of us read the whole case to know those like the Poling case had a gene inherited from her mother of which they never knew about. Not only will vaccine affect that child, but so will other medications and viruses, all her life. Should vaccine court compensate a person for a genetic defect? They did and they do. They did not compensate for a faulty vaccine.

<quoted text>No, it's anti-vaccine people like you who are to blame for spreading scare stories about vaccines causing things like autism, for which there is no credible evidence. That's why I call you a potential mass murderer.

Is that why they had ANOTHER congressional hearing on it Hawkings? Because there is NO ISSUE? Seems absurd to have a hearing over nothing.Explain to us why a hearing took place then.

<quoted text>There's no credible evidence that autism is one of the side effects of any vaccine. For that reason, no vaccine compensation has been paid out for any autism case in the USA, UK, or Canada. The compensation programs are for those who suffer from real side effects, not imaginary ones. That's the real world you wannabe potential mass murderer.

Thanks for replying again so my post can't be deleted by the provac neanderthal moderator.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.