Discuss the latest comic book news and front page articles, read or post your own reviews of comics, and talk about anything comic book related. Threads from the two subforums below will also show up here. News Stand topics can also be read and posted in from The Asylum.

doombug wrote:I'll review it when I get it. Worry about your own life.

my life?that's what this is about!I had to review a last issue of a mini-series about a character I could give two fucks about and you don't even bother to bother with it!GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT MAN!!!!!!!

thefourthman wrote:my life?that's what this is about!I had to review a last issue of a mini-series about a character I could give two fucks about and you don't even bother to bother with it!GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT MAN!!!!!!!

You reviewed said comic when it would have been a great week for an Amber Atoms. Get YOUR priorities straight!

thefourthman wrote:my life?that's what this is about!I had to review a last issue of a mini-series about a character I could give two fucks about and you don't even bother to bother with it!GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT MAN!!!!!!!

I know your performance posting but...You don't have to read and review every single book of the review group.

John Snow wrote:4 reviews has to be a new low for a Marvel book (The RG does looooove it's Marvel) maybe we should come up with a Blindspot rule.

The Blindspot Rule would be what exactly? If you select a Marvel book that four people or less review, that is the final chapter of a limited series, and that you fail to review yourself, you earn John Snow's unending contempt.

doombug wrote:I said I'd review the book when I can get to the comic, christ fourthy. How many times do I have to write something in order for you to understand it.

all I am saying, this was a pick that was pretty contested and was stated to be a book that would have a low turn out and you couldn't even be bothered to be timely with yours... if YOU aren't even excited about it, why should we be?

You can say you will review it later all you want... doesn't change the fact that you haven't or that it was probably a bad pick to begin with...

I'm not even suggesting group kicking, cause as small as we are (active review wise, every week) we need that like we need another punchy... all I am suggesting is that there should be some penalty for folks who can't be bothered with their own book (or timely with it)... It shouldn't be that big of a deal to review your own pick on the week the book ships.

thefourthman wrote:all I am saying, this was a pick that was pretty contested and was stated to be a book that would have a low turn out and you couldn't even be bothered to be timely with yours... if YOU aren't even excited about it, why should we be?

You can say you will review it later all you want... doesn't change the fact that you haven't or that it was probably a bad pick to begin with...

I'm not even suggesting group kicking, cause as small as we are (active review wise, every week) we need that like we need another punchy... all I am suggesting is that there should be some penalty for folks who can't be bothered with their own book (or timely with it)... It shouldn't be that big of a deal to review your own pick on the week the book ships.

Agreed. Every time someone doesn't review their own book, fourthy gets bumped down one spot in the rotation.