And you’ve been helping us – by telling it like it is, out in the real world, and here in the new, free media online, where no orthodox idiot languishing on a corporate local paper can censor you.

We’d like to thank you all and in this final article, show you how brave you are to resist orthodoxy, how important it is historically, and however difficult it may be, what a good cause you represent.

In many ways, you’re in a very similar situation to that which people in Germany in the 1920s and early 1930s found themselves in.

In many ways – although of course not all.

Most feminists do not actively try and murder their opponents, as the Nazis did. (although some do).

But feminists do have a lot in common with the Nazis.

For one thing, the feminist establishment is directly responsible for an epidemic in male suicide in the last decade which has a strong parallel in the epidemic of Jewish suicide in the 1930s.

In the last decade the male suicide rate in Britain has shot up by seventy per-cent.

An epidemic of suicide of that staggering scale should be cause for alarm, and action.

But nothing in done, and instead – in political initiatives like ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ – the victim is blamed .

Funny how we never seem to hear about it from the mass media: only that ‘2 women a week are killed by the partners’ – a tiny proportion of killings in comparison to the explosion of deaths through suicide.

We believe these rising suicides are akin to state killings.

Making it ‘impossible’ for a social group to live is how an oppressive regime traditionally kills them off.

The Manchester Guardian of January 22-23 1934 noted of the Third Reich that “while not directly killing a single Jew, its laws make it impossible for thousands of Jews to live, and it is largely they that have caused the epidemic of suicides amongst the German Jews.”

Senator Ann Cools in Canada and feminist Erin Pizzey are both now pushing hard to expose how in the West, the Government, police and local councils use new, bent ‘domestic abuse’ laws to deliberately arrest men, based purely on their gender.

In June this year in America, 58 year old Tom Ball killed himself on the steps of his ‘family’ court.

Tom wrote: “Labeling someone’s action as domestic violence in America in the 21st century is akin to labeling someone a Jew in Germany in the 1930′s.

“The entire legal weight of the state is coming down on him.”

It’s true. The Violence Against Women Act sounds lovely doesn’t it? Who could possibly object to a little act that says its against violence to women?

Well – anyone who’s actually read it. Ot anyone who’s seen how, like ‘Domestic Abuse Awareness Week’, it’s based on statistics that are drivel, and is simply the tool of an enormous state system aimed at criminalising men.

It’s important to debunk lying statistics, especially if they are being used for political actions.

Nazi Eugenics – the racial predecessor to feminism – also relied on lies, and was also popular, supported by charity, and commanded universal sympathy.

It started in California. It was financed by corporate charity and endorsed by big business .

Just like Professor Stanko of the University of London who cooked up the bogus ‘1 in 4′ domestic violence to serve the Labour Governments sexist aims, history now records that academics in the 20s at Stamford, Yale, Harvard, and Princeton “faked and twisted data to serve eugenics’ racist aims.”

It became fashionable to study this bogus pseudo-science. The BBC broadcast lectures on it, while of course the Daily Mail actively supported National Socialism (the harmless sounding name the Nazis actually went under).

Thank God, it never really took on here. But no thanks to the BBC or the Mail. They weren’t going to questions eugenics – despite surely knowing it was based on nonsense – any more than they question feminism now.

And of course in Germany – it did take on, politically, in a big way: and their society became one in which it was difficult to get on if you didn’t sympathise with the ideas of Eugenics, and endorse these race-based myths and statistics as a fast-track to promotion.

Again – much like feminism now. And as for the spectre of Hitler – well when he started out, Hitler was to Eugenics only what Valerie Solanas is to feminism – the difference is that he succeeded in his bloodthirsty, lunatic schemes.

In the 1930s, German newsreel makers took their orders straight from the Third Reich’s Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, and never questioned a lying statistic or factoid put their way.

And apparently the mass media in Britain and in Cornwall today takes its orders from the domestic abuse lobby – a body equally lacking in integrity and honesty, whose press releases were this week – just as we warned you they would be – reproduced VERBATIM in the local ‘press’.

Shame on these lazy, tired hacks for not daring to question authority when they are just as free to as we are.

The domestic abuse lobby need to be exposed for the witch-hunting, dim-witted political and intellectual cowards they are.

These lying scumbags even indoctrinate CHILDREN into hating men, as a gender, exactly like the Nazis indoctrinated hatred of the Jews into innocent German kids.

Look at this: what’s the difference between these disgusting sexist picture books, aimed at vulnerable toddlers, to convince them of gender hatred.

This revolting propaganda is the same as Nazi kids book vilifying Jews

And these disgusting racist ones..

The Nazis taught kids race-hate - Feminists teach them to hate men

aimed at vulnerable toddlers, to convince them of race hatred?

There’s none: so why do so many people tolerate it?

Maybe it’s because sometimes it’s difficult to see the wood for the trees.

The illustrations above, drawn from a German primer for children of six, were by the hand of an eighteen-year-old art student, Elvira Bauer.

Presumably Elvira, like Michelle Davies, the council’s £37k pa ‘domestic abuse co-ordinator’ in 2011, got on very well for herself, in 1935 in Berlin.

Presumably she didn’t have fangs, claws, horns or a red tail, and to do this cartoon, probably she was talented and maybe she was even nice looking.

It’s easy for us to despise her as a fascist decades later.

It’s not as easy to spot the dangerous authoritarian charlatans who pose a threat to our liberty in Britain today.

So the outspoken support that CCN readers have given to our campaign this week exposing the lies of ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ has been astonishing, frankly: extraordinary, and heartening.

For every anonymous feminist re-spouting disproven statistics, hundreds of you have recommended and supported our series of articles.

We think totalitarianism posing as ‘feminism’ is a genuine and big social problem that needs serious political opposition applied to it, not just a couple of jokes, or supercilious dismissal.

We think it’s the state that has an abusive relationship with us as supposedly free citizens.

And as any drivelling ‘domestic abuse’ apparatchick is always keen to tell you, the biggest step to break the chains of abuse is the first step.

In this bullying relationship, in which Government officials are the abusers, our first step and yours is to publicly question officialdom.

There’s a limit to how far you should indulge anyone their political beliefs. And racism and sexism constitute that limit.

You wouldn’t humour a racist who said 1 in 4 black people steal.

Why humour a feminist who says 1 in 4 men abuse women?

Both statements are equally untrue – both are equally offensive.

There is no excuse for one more penny of taxpayers money to be spent on the hateful ‘Domestic Abuse’ lobby.

It is a sick con, preying on and perverting the goodly instincts of honest, decent people who react emotionally to false propaganda about beaten women and children.

Yet Cornwall spends more than £50,000 on this evil brainwashing: £37 odd grand of it on ‘Domestic Violence Advisor’ Michelle Davies’s wage.

For all our sakes – just sack her.

Let her go out there and do some constructive work, for the good of society, rather than being paid to try and poison our minds with lies.

The council also pay £15,000 to the ‘Womens Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre’.

The jobs that the women – (they engage only women) – in this organisation do are completely pointless – and they don’t even do those pointless jobs properly, because they’re too busy storming Punch and Judy shows

There is not a lot of rape in Cornwall. There is not a lot of sexual abuse.

And when heinous crimes of this nature occasionally do happen they are more than enthusiastically prosecuted by the local police and CPS.

The myth of thousands of female victims cowering across the Duchy and needing confidential support lines and a constant kindly ear is offensive and ludicrous.

Setting up WRSAC is like setting up a support line for Aryans suffering exploitation at the hands of Jews in 1930s Berlin.

Elvira the Nazi art student would have got a nice fat commission for that one – doing a nice little cartoon for the ‘Aryan Cheat and Domestic Extortion Centre’.

She could have pictured the great shadow of a looming Jew, hat and curls as clearly defined as the big muscles of the man in the feminist cartoon above, towering over a little blonde girl with pigtails, pathetically holding out her piggy bank.

No doubt back then, her book would have gone in all the council libraries, just like feminist fairy tales get whole sections in Cornish libraries today.

The ‘chief executive’ of the WRSAC would probably have kept a copy in the office.

Call out for the local authority to stem the bleeding away of your money from important basic necessities like public toilets, , and buses into the pockets of political extremists like Maggie Parks.

This week at CCN, we’re talking to Cornish victims of ‘domestic abuse’ – the invasion of a citizens private and family life by the state.

It’s our answer to the ridiculous and sinister police and council propaganda drive for ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ swallowed without question by the old media.

We’re calling on the public to flick two fingers at this creeping fascism, in which we’re all encouraged to suspect each other of imaginary crimes.

Instead, we’re asking ‘Cui Bono?’ (‘Who Benefits’) from all this propaganda and what’s it for?

We believe we can show that it’s the officials behind ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ who are themselves the guilty parties.

They’re scapegoating their victims in an attempt to keep the crimes they commit against humanity safely secret in the‘family’ court and social services.

But time is running out for these child-abusing hypocrites – as the children who are the victims of their dangerous dogma grow up and speak out.

Today Mark Harris and his 24 year old daughter Lisa, who were terribly emotionally abused by social workers and family court judges for 16 years, answer our call for people not to ‘Suffer in Silence’ over official domestic abuse.

Mark Harris, who grew up in St Austell, fought for ten years and went to the notorious ‘family court’ 133 times just to see his three daughters Lisa, Laura and Lindsey.

The three girls all wanted to see their Dad but officials stopped them claiming this would be ‘abuse’ of their mother, because she would be upset.

The brave three sisters finally defied the law and ran away seven years ago to be with their Dad. They live with him still.

Driving instructor Mark explained: “What people perhaps don’t understand is how the ‘domestic abuse’ racket is actually used to abuse children and tear apart families.

“Claiming domestic abuse will get you custody of the kids, the house, maintenance paid, the lot – and solicitors tell women to do it.

“It doesn’t need to be proved – it just needs for there to be an allegation.

“So it’s massively irresponsible of any media to stir up innocent viewers and readers into believing there is an epidemic of domestic abuse.

“There is not. But false allegations of abuse are widespread and used to evil ends.

“The end they achieve is always stopping some poor child seeing a father or grandparent.”

“By contrast, nothing is done about violence towards children that is committed by mothers, or the partners of single mothers.”

“I was falsely accused of domestic abuse, ironically, because of real violence that my ex’s boyfriend was subjecting my children too.”

52 year old Mark explained: “I went to court partly because the girls complained they were being hit, pinched and bullied by my ex’s new boyfriend.

“So I tried to get an order so that the children would stay with me.

“Of course, nothing was done.

“The Judge, Nicholas Wilson – now in the supreme court – accepted in Plymouth that the boyfriend was using ‘inappropriate force on the children’.

“But, you see, this domestic abuse thing, is only used if it can be used against a traditional family unit.

“Real violence is ignored by the officials when it doesn’t suit them.

“In my case, the boyfriend was called to account for himself: in response, he threatened outright in the witness box to ‘kill me’ five times.

“But at the end of the case, rather than do anything about the real problem of violence by a step-parent, the Judge jailed me – because I had waved at my kids.”

Judge’s Wilson’s incredible perversion of justice was done in the name of ‘harassment’ – one of the many definitions of ‘domestic abuse’.

Mark had resorted to waving at his daughters on the way to school, because although the court had ordered his ex to let them see him twice a week, she never did.

On that basis he was accused – and summarily convicted – by one judge, with no jury, and no press allowed – of domestic abuse by ‘harrassment’,.

Mark recalled: “For some official to accuse me of harassment and abuse – while letting a man he knew was violent take my kids home – was beyond a joke.”

Mark was jailed for four months for contempt of court. He served 45 days in Exeter. When he got out, false claims of domestic abuse ensued.

He explained: “The girls mother now phoned the police with a flurry of complaints about domestic abuse.

“What she said was that I was following and ‘watching’ her whenever she went out to the shops.

“She made so many complaints that the beat bobbies who had to deal with it actually got together and followed her.

“A policeman followed her from her home, to school, and to the shops – after which she walked into the police station, with the allegation of domestic abuse.

“Unfortunately for her, four policemen walked in after her and said ‘We know you’re lying, we’ve been following you’ – and that was that.

“But that was eleven years ago – today, with the zeal of the domestic abuse ‘professionals’ and the way it is dealt with, I wonder what would happen.”

Mark had more and more problems with officialdom, and was even jailed again for ten months for contempt, serving 84 days in Pentonville.

Eventually his three daughters ran away from their mothers home and came to live with him.

Lisa recalled: “For years, no-one listened to us. We complained about the boyfriend and said we wanted see our Dad.

“But all they cared about was the ‘welfare and wellbeing’ of our Mother.

Yesterday we exposed the lie put about by ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ that ‘1 in 4’ people are victims of domestic abuse.

Let’s look at a couple more big, nasty, man-hating fibs.

As we saw yesterday, under Labour, the Home Office twisted beyond recognition or plain invented a string of misandrist lies in order to falsely claim an ‘epidemic’ of ‘domestic violence’ in the UK.

The media largely swallowed it wholesale, and repeated the lies – which is what is happening in Devon and Cornwall this week as old media reproduce press releases for ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ and carry out carefully pre-selected interviews with beaten women.

Emotive and shocking, this drive to convince us ‘1 in 4′ people suffer ‘domestic abuse’ is based on false statistics.

It’s cynically geared to bully us into accepting lies without question.

The examples of victims that are wheeled out for the media are never placed in a proper statistical context – that is, it’s never said how rare they are.

Like all propaganda, the drive relies heavily on upsetting pictures of individual womens injuries, and is designed to make us feel terrible for them.

Decent, honest people are badgered into blindly extending sympathy to ‘domestic violence’ campaigners, because of extreme cases of murder, or horrific mutilation.

But behind this aggressive PR, police, councils, and authority in general is ruthlessly repeating ‘factoids’ – wrong statistics – to convince us of lies.

That’s dangerous, anti-social, and harmful to communities, because it spreads the false idea that lots and lots of men are abusive.

And the ‘domestic abuse’ campaigners are at the same time laying the groundwork for rotten legislation that allows the indiscriminate, targeted arrest, and persecution, of men, on account of their gender.

The old media will not tell you that the facts they publish in news articles are reproduced unquestioned from official press releases from the police.

But they are, and we can prove it.

For example: in 2007 BBC Radio 4’s Ten O’Clock news broadcast the following bulletin:

“Domestic Violence affects 1 in 4 women. Indeed for women between 15 and 44 it’s the biggest cause of mortality.”

In the same year, Kent police wrote on their website that: “Domestic Violence is the leading cause of death for women aged between 19 and 44.”

And the Guardian wrote: “Globally, violence against women is the leading cause of death for 15 to 44 year olds.”

And it turns out the amazing claim – presented to you, the public, as fact, by the old media – that domestic violence kills most 15 to 44 year old women isn’t true either.

Like so many other twisted facts and wrongful vague assertions in the domestic violence business, it was simply invented by the authors of the 2005 report.

This was exposed in a little-heard Radio 4 programme about statistics that same year.

‘More or Less’ challenged the Ten O’Clock news figure – and found it was a misquote from the infamous report.

The document in fact stated domestic violence was the biggest cause of morbidity – not mortality – so ill health, rather than death – in women aged 15 to 44.

But it turns out even that was a lie.

Domestic violence is not the leading cause of death in women aged 15, or 19, to 44 – or indeed of any age – and neither is it the leading cause of ill health.

The top three global reasons for ill health in younger women are depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

And the top three global causes of death are HIV, followed by tuberculosis and then suicide. (World Health Organisation, 2007)

Domestic violence doesn’t make it into the top five.

That is – not unless you’re a feminist who’s been paid £3million to produce a report for a Fabian Government.

Today we can expose how the 2005 researchers made this statistical fiction an apparent reality.

1. They found a 1993 report by the World Bank which said ‘domestic violence and rape’ was the sixth highest cause of ill health in women across the globe aged 15 to 44.
2. They copied it into their report on the UK in 2005 – but
– Dropped all mention of ‘rape’
– Ignored the fact that it was a global, not a national statistic
And last and most strikingly of all – promoted it from sixth to first place – on a whim.

When the Home Office were challenged about this, their excuse was that the lie they had told was ‘for illustrative purposes’.

?

Nope. We don’t see that that’s any excuse for lying either.

Here’s some more: it’s astonishing how many of the statistics the old media broadcast are just made brazenly up, and how many simply impossible.

Why do we get fed this nonsense as propaganda? Cui Bono? Who Benefits?

These bogus statistics prop up an industry: a massive, inter-linked, publicly funded business that centres around two big, unaccountable, secret British bureaucracies.

These are ‘Social Services’ – know to campaigners as the ‘SS’ – and this country’s reviled ‘family’ court’ system.

Whenever there is an allegation of ‘domestic abuse’, a big expensive state machine starts up and thousands of official jobs are justified.

This approach is described innocuously as ‘multi-agency’.

What it means is that social workers, council officials, nurses, doctors, and coppers are all involved in propagating, or subjected to, the same socio-political agenda.

Normally the ‘multi-agency’ thing is too boring for the press and public, and the officials are just left to get on with it or ignored.

But when you start looking into individual cases it’s genuinely sinister.

Take the case of Melanie Garvey.

Melanie, who’s from Falmouth, unfortunately got the state involved in her family.

She was promptly unfairly accused by a doctor of having ‘learning difficulties’, after which council SS snatched her child.

In the end Melanie’s child was forcibly taken from her, and put up for ‘forced adoption’.

Melanie hadn’t done anything wrong. But the nurse, after her course on child protection, had been told to go to her superiors if she even suspected something was awry.

And that is exactly the message – and the danger – of ‘Domestic Abuse Week’.

The first police press release – ‘Domestic Abuse – Would You Recognise the Signs?’, sets the anti-social, paranoid tone with council official Rachel Martin saying: “We sincerely hope that this year’s campaign will give people the confidence to call for help.

“Even if they just have a niggling suspicion that something isn’t right.” .

In the style of the domestic abuse industry, the release then outlines some vague and broad criteria so we can all suspect each other.

Crimes like ‘jealous behaviour’ and ‘psychological abuse’ make the reader comfortable with suspecting pretty much anybody they know who’s not single.

Then on top of it all DCI Steve Parker proclaims confidently: “There is a link between animal cruelty and domestic abuse.”

This is a brazen attempt to get poisonous politics into the local papers and on the TV by prostituting fluffy animals for the cause.

But ask yourself – can what this policeman says – that ‘There is a link between animal cruelty and domestic abuse’ – really be true?

Really? Is there proper research? Because would it not be possible for a bully to still keep a dog in good shape?

In which case – who do we suspect – owners of well-kept dogs? Or neglected ones?

Or perhaps the answer they want to hear at the council and police HQ is ‘both’?

And that’s the whole wretched game. ‘Spread mistrust and paranoia among the public, then they’ll turn to us – the officials – for everything. We’ll have all the power, and all the lovely Government funding.’

In fact DCI Parker is repeating baseless propaganda he’s been told, contrived to make us all madly suspicious of each other.

And by the time your average idiot has cooed over a refuge pet on a TV screen or in a newspaper article, they’ve bypassed consecutive thought and convinced themselves of the terrible plague of wife-beaters out there.

So – no joke – next time your cat looks at you funny in front of a dolt – hold tight for the unannounced visit from the council lady wanting to take the baby back.

The other propaganda releases are just as bad, and some worse.

In ‘Taking back control’ we hear from Sara Williams, whose mortgage depends on the ‘Domestic Violence’ industry.

Sara is an ‘Independent Domestic Violence Advisor from a ‘Domestic Violence and Abuse Service’, her wage fully taxpayer funded.

Unsurprising then perhaps, that she wants us to report in to her not if we suspect ‘domestic violence’ – but if we suspect it might happen in the future.

She tells us: “Abusers will often try to separate the victim from friends and family.

“They may be very jealous. This can take forms such as controlling the clothes their partner wears or the people their partner is allowed to see.”

Sara then says this sort of behaviour – (presumably including your wife telling you you’re not going out with the lads and not to wear that hideous jumper) – “can be seen in the early stages of an abusive relationship”.

And not to worry if actually it turns out that the nagging, vain, moaning other half isn’t beating your mate up, phone in anyway because “even if the abuse does not escalate it can be deeply traumatic and severely affect the person.”

Next up is ‘Cyber-stalking’ – or looking at your ex’s Facebook profile.

This is a serious crime in the world of the ‘domestic abuse’ industry.

It’s also cynically put together to appeal to the old media who, while fighting a losing battle with Facebook, are forced to namecheck the network to appear ‘with it’.

An anonymous victim tells ‘KOR Communications’ – the expensive PR agency working for the cops and council – she was stalked by her ex.

She claims: “He would go to terrifying lengths to find me. He was able to add information that was untrue.”

Then we hear that her ‘ex’ left nine years ago – begging the unasked, and unanswered question: ‘Do you have any children by your ex, when did he last see them, and if we are to accept your claim and sympathise with your case, cherry-picked in total isolation from any quantifiable context; will you promise us that it was you, and not his children, who – almost a decade after you split up – he wished to ‘find’?’

Follow-up questions based in reality on a postcard please.

Today, celebrated feminists like Erin Pizzey accept and seek to tackle the social epidemic in Britain of the ‘domestic abuse’ of men and children by ‘muppet mothers’, who abuse ‘domestic violence’ laws to in turn emotionally abuse chilldren by depriving them of their right to fathers, and to a family life.

But none of that’s happened in the official world of ‘domestic abuse’ – and as you can see in this article, this week’s disinformation in the tired, dated, out of touch, lazy old media is more full of holes than a big, stinky, feminist Swiss cheese.

Perhaps if the factoids and lies only consisted of good old-fashioned 1970s man-hate, they wouldn’t be quite so dangerous.

But they don’t. The basest of the media drives this week focuses on ‘re-educating’ nurses and doctors to suspect mothers with newborns.

This affects not just men and children, but mothers.

Babies and children can’t answer back, so can be spirited away by the kind of authorities involved in the ‘domestic abuse’ drive into care homes, using the secret, unnaccountable, undemocratic ‘family’ courts.

This is because the system of protection a baby enters if the state gets involved works around an old Communist trick to bypass justice.

Soviet justice was not democratic. Instead, tribunals declared whether or not a defendant had acted ‘in the interests of the people’.

Today, in the UK, the reviled ‘family’ courts use the same scam.

They sit in secret, the lame, cowardly old media accept a ban publicising anything that goes on in them, no matter how wrong – and their guiding principle is not based on evidence, proof, or reason – but the idea that officials can be trusted to act, in secret, ‘in the interest of the child’.

Of course – like the Soviet tyrants – the officials, many of whom are stupid, gullible, or suffer from personality disorders, just make whatever decision suits them, shifting the responsibility for it onto someone too small to answer back – the ‘child’.

See tomorrow’s interview to find out what children really think of this revolting deceit, and what they have to say about these supposedly kind and caring officials when they grow up.

During ‘Domestic Abuse Week': ‘More than 60 healthcare professionals will be involved in practical workshops to help identify and advise pregnant women and new mothers who may be experiencing domestic abuse.”

A press release claims: “ It is estimated, between four and nine women in every 100 are abused during pregnancy or just after the birth.”

Note the words: ‘ It is estimated’. By who? On what grounds? Ours not to reason why. So let’s put that statement in context.

It is estimated this article will be recommended 1,567 times and be read from start to finish by all its readers.

That estimation was based on nothing. It was a guess. Just like the estimate about ‘four and nine women in every 100’.

The release goes on: “And one midwife in five knows that at least one of her expectant mothers is a victim.”

They just can’t stop their inappropriate Colgate/Whiskas nine out of ten cats outdated slogans can they?

One midwife in five..’at least one of her expectant mothers’….what – the mothers she meets in one day? During her life? How many then?

And how does she know? Because she was told? How does she know what she was told was true? Or are feminists – as usual – imagining and assuming mens guilt?

Look back at the statistics exposed in this and our first article and take our word for it – they’re making this whole thing up on the fly.

Det Sgt Chloe Webber – still imagining ‘the abuser’ (no gender – but presumably few of the victim women have been impregnated by other women) at large, says: “Pregnancy and just after birth is a particular dangerous time.

“The victim’s attention is often taken away from her partner and directed towards the baby.

“The abuser’s control and power is challenged and as a result abuse can either begin or escalate to ensure the victim remains under the abuser’s control.”

Then we get more of the same old dafty about how “abuse can be emotional, financial” and isn’t abuse at all.

Recognising any of these quotes from the BBC or local papers? If so, it means they didn’t even do their own lame interviews with carefully pre-chosen, totally unrepresentative victims.

Just copied out the Government press release and told you it was true.

Which it’s not.

It’s a very, very nasty piece of human rights violation in preparation.

Listen to this bit: ADVA manager Rachel Martin said: “We are really pleased to be able to hold these training workshops to help educate healthcare professionals.

“The knowledge they gain can be used in hospital maternity units, health centres, GP surgeries and children’s centres .

Dozens of staff from these institutions are going to be shown propaganda plays by ‘Tender’ – (Tagline: Domestic Abuse: No Excuse!) – about how to spot if you’re being ‘abused’.

Here in Cornwall, the council’s £36k per annum ‘Domestic Violence’ expert Michelle Davies managed – while the council planned to axe bus services and half its toilets – to get funding for a full time ‘Independent Domestic Violence Advocate’ at Treliske – in the Midwifery Department.

Do none of our female readers find this terrifying? If not – they should.

Because all this doesn’t just mean another official lever for a single mother to fast-track a partner out of the house – wrong as that is alone.

It can also end in horrific official abuse of women and children: Cases like this . And this. And this .

But let’s let Rachel Martin, Manager for ADVA (Against Domestic Abuse and Violence in Devon), have the last word.

True to form, one of the official press releases for ‘abuse week’ quotes this ‘Domestic Abuse Manager’ as insisting: “With one person in four suffering domestic abuse at some time in their lives….”

A massive onslaught of hate propaganda aimed at men will hit local media this week – AGAIN.

The local police and council orchestrate ‘Domestic Abuse Awareness’ drives interminably, year after year, as the ‘DV’ industry gets more and more profitable, Governments fail to act, and more and more men are driven to their deaths and children dispossessed and abused by crazed, pig-ignorant bigots handed jobs as the state’s thuggish ‘family police’ force of pseudo-social workers, so-called lawyers, and increasingly, moronic police officers and council workers who terrorise the public in their homes.

Over the next seven days these authoritarian, unthinking idiots will be sending out a volley of inaccurate claims and statistics to the local press designed to make headlines.

That means TV, radio, and the local papers will all be full of what will sound like facts and figures suggesting Cornwall is full of violent men, and beaten women.

Neither 1 in 4 people nor 1 in 4 women suffer what any reasonable person would ever class as ‘domestic abuse’.

The last Labour Government paid to have this statistic cooked up.

In 2005, the Home Office paid an American feminist at Royal Holloway and Bedford College £3million for ‘a review of domestic violence’.

She produced a report which broke down the word ‘domestic violence’ and gave it new definitions which were nothing to do with violence at all.

They included:

‘Watching her’
‘Telling her children things she doesn’t want them to know’
‘Criticising her appearance’
‘Sending her unwanted gifts.’
‘Ignoring her’
‘Refusing to have sex with her’
‘Denying her sexuality’

The definitions effectively covered anything and everything – and, it’s worth repeating, had nothing to do with ‘abuse’ or ‘violence’.

Armed with these dreamed up criteria, the College did a survey – not of women at large – but of women in domestic violence refuges.

This meant the research was unrepresentative to start with.

But added to that – because of the wacky criteria they’d just invented for ‘domestic abuse’ – if the researchers got a negative reply to questions about being beaten, they simply kept on, and asked if the interviewee had ever been criticised or ignored.

Incredibly, three out of four women still said ‘No’.

That means that the real ‘domestic abuse’ statistic this:

‘3 out of 4 women in womens refuges say no man every did anything unpleasant to them ever at all.’!

The false figure – that ‘1 in 4’ have suffered abuse – isn’t true at all because the word ‘abuse’ does not actually mean what it says: its meaning has been twisted and its truth stretched – beyond recognition – to mean just being ‘ignored’ or ‘watched’, or even ‘confused’.

London School of Economics Psychologist Oliver Curry explained: “When the ‘1 in 4’ domestic abuse statistic is boiled down, it means this.

“That one in four women over the course of their lives will be ignored for a period of time by their partners.”

He remarked: “It’s unfortunate if energy directed towards solving a really serious problem is dissipated on things like that.”

Founding feminist Erin Pizzey was the first woman in Britain to recognise genuine cases of violence against women.

Erin founded the first UK womens refuge: but she now campaigns for mens rights and speaks out against the ‘domestic abuse’ industry.

She says her genuine attempts to do good were hijacked by man-hating feminists, and that modern ‘domestic abuse’ industry is a dangerous racket.

She explained: “The problem is that the classification for domestic violence covers all acts.

“And the problem with that is you end up with the entire population of Britain in prison.”

She added: “False allegations of domestic violence are common, and they’re used a fast track to a divorce, in order to immediately obtain the home, and child custody.”

Here’s Canadian senator Ann Cools speaking out on the ‘nonsense’ that comes out of Womens Refuges, and how poor and inaccurate the research is.

The new UK Government promised to cut wasteful public spending like the £3million handed out to the dishonest feminist researchers by Labour in 2005.

In fact it’s done very little to stop the millions going to politically correct groups, instead asking councils to decide where to make cuts, leaving the local authorities to cut vital facilities , then moan about how terrible the cuts are.

Cornwall and Devon are still packed with publicly subsidised feminist groups whose primary job it is to repeat these old lies about ‘domestic violence’.

Take ‘AVDA’ – the special anti domestic violence unit within Devon County Council which is behind the police ‘Domestic Abuse Week’.

Look at their homepage, and you’ll see they’ve gone one step beyond carefully skewing research: they’ve just plain made up a load more definitions.

According to ‘AVDA’, if a man ‘confuses’ a woman, he is guilty of ‘psychological abuse’

And there’s a separate section for ‘financial abuse’ on the AVDA page on which they list: ‘Not paying child support’.

The second example of ‘financial abuse’ is even further removed from what sensible people might recognise as ‘abuse’ or ‘violence’.

AVDA say if a person ‘threatens to report their partner to the Benefits Agency or other authorities’ – you guessed it – that’s domestic abuse too.

It would certainly be interesting to know what the council’s benefits agency investigators think of that one.

The truth is that the facts and figures forced down your threat during ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ bear no relation to the real world at all.

If the above examples enough weren’t enough to convince you already, take AVDA’s definition of sexual abuse.

Which would make an awful lot of style-conscious young girls sexual abusers of their friends.

And would also mean that the next time your wife tells you not to wear that awful jumper, you could phone the police and have her jailed for sexually abusing you.

It’s nonsense.

And it’s not silly, or amusing nonsense.

It’s dangerous nonsense.

Blaming the victim is something tyrants have done since time immemorial to mollify the public at large.

Today you only have to switch off your TV or put your paper down to look out at the world around you that it’s men who are the victims of feminist-driven society.

The tyrannical and secret ‘family’ courts deny a man his basic right to a family life.

And official discrimination means that businesses are bound by law to employ women – but not men.

The results can be seen in every street of every town in Britain.

Here are some real statistics for you.

– 90 per-cent of all court-assisted family separations end in a man losing both their home, and contact with their children
– 74 per-cent of court-assisted family separations feature allegations of ‘domestic abuse’
– Former ‘Family Court’ judge Robert Johnson estimates the number of those allegations that are true to be “not many”
– Under new legislation, women have to allege ‘domestic abuse’ to qualify for legal aid
– 40 per-cent of all separating fathers lose contact with their own children within two years
– 1 in 4 homes are single parent headed
– 90 per-cent of the homeless are men
– 60 per-cent of those made redundant in the last 10 years in Britain have been men
– 83 per-cent of new jobs in the last 10 years have been given to women
– In the last ten years the male suicide rate has risen by 70 per-cent
(Sources: Department of Work and Pensions, HMCourts, BBC live interview, Shelter, ONS, and SPIG)

Think on that the next time you see the untrue ‘1 in 4’ statistic repeated on TV, Radio or in the papers, along with the press suggesting you be suspicious of brutal men.

Think about the fact that three out of four women in domestic violence refuges told researchers no man had ever laid a finger on them.

And then maybe think on Burke’s famous lines:

“It is necessary only for good men to say nothing for evil to triumph.”

We believe the evil of ‘Domestic Abuse Week’ is in its instigation.

Among other things, over the next week we hope to show that its authors are officials who abuse or endorse the abuse of families and children.

They’re engaged in the age-old tyrants tactic of blaming a scapegoat for their own crimes.

Complain to the overtly biased and inaccurate BBC about their farcical and insulting Panorama ‘investigation’ into ‘Domestic Abuse’. Remember when you do that the BBC are so insanely arrogant they hold a policy that there are ‘some people’ it is a good thing to offend, so unless you couch your complaint about their disgusting bigotry in very technical terms indeed (you can find statistics to help you do that in the link above) they’ll take it as a compliment.

Get cracking. It only takes a second and you’ll feel better afterwards.

Tomorrow: Lies, Damn Lies and More Statistics

Note to loyal readers: you facebooked this article 114 times – well done and thanks for contributing to the campaign! It only shows no fbks or tweets below because that’s what happens when you change the category sometimes!

]]>http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2014/10/02/good-for-foo/feed/0CALLING AT LONDON, BIRMINGHAM…AND MARS?http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2014/10/01/calling-at-london-birmingham-and-mars/
http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2014/10/01/calling-at-london-birmingham-and-mars/#commentsWed, 01 Oct 2014 20:07:49 +0000http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/?p=20803Newquay Cornwall Airport has been identified as a possible location for the UK’s first spaceport for commercial space flight.

A cross-government team, including the UK Space Agency, Civil Aviation Authority and Department for Transport, has published a long list of eight sites that it has identified as potentially suitable for a spaceport.

The Government is committed to achieving a four-fold expansion of the UK space industry to £40bn by 2030, including an ambition to establish a spaceport in the UK by 2018.

A spaceport is a facility for the operation of sub-orbital spaceplanes.

These are commercial civilian aircraft that may operate to deploy satellites, perform space experiments, or for space tourism.

Newquay Cornwall Airport is the only site in England identified by the review as matching the proposed criteria for a spaceport.

Other sites have been identified in Wales and Scotland.

The Department for Transport will now start a consultation period before inviting formal bids in the autumn, with a view to choosing a preferred site by April next year.

Newquay Cornwall Airport is already home to Aerohub, the aerospace-focused Enterprise Zone which extends to 325 hectares and is the largest planning-free development site in the UK.

It is located on the coast with uncongested and unrestricted airspace and one of the longest runways (2,744m) in the UK – all crucial criteria for a spaceport.

As well as being home to an increasing number of aerospace-focused businesses on the site, Aerohub is also the UK test location for The BLOODHOUND Project, the UK-led global project to build a supersonic jet-powered car that aims to set a 1,000mph land speed record.

Chris Pomfret of the Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership said: “The Aerohub at Newquay Cornwall Airport is a unique and nationally important asset and we want to unlock further growth in the aerospace and space sectors to create skilled well-paid jobs.

“Satellite technology is also an important part of the future economic strategy for Cornwall.

“To be shortlisted by the UK Space Agency review speaks volumes for the quality and location of Aerohub, but it is very early days. Before we make any decisions about whether we might eventually bid to host a spaceport we need to look carefully at the Civil Aviation Authority’s technical report and engage with the consultation over the coming months before deciding on any next steps.”

The Superfast Cornwall programme today announced plans to include additional remote communities in its roll-out of fibre optic broadband.

Another 10 hard-to-reach communities will now receive fibre broadband by early 2015.

They are the villages of Badgall, Laneast, St Clether and Tregeare, near Bodmin; Nancledra in West Cornwall; and Philleigh, Polhendra, Trethewell, Trewithian and Rosevine on the Roseland peninsula.

Superfast Cornwall has already made the fibre broadband network available to 90 per cent of Cornish homes and businesses.

This makes Cornwall one of the best connected rural areas in Europe – with 95 per cent coverage by the end of the year.

These new areas are in addition to those already planned and still being built, which already include many challenging rural locations as well as further work in some town centres.

Nigel Ashcroft, Superfast Cornwall programme director for Cornwall Development Company, the economic development company of Cornwall Council, said: “Cornwall has many small villages with up to 100 premises.

Some of these villages are in isolated and challenging geographical areas and are difficult to provide fibre to.

We are excited that we can make this announcement to bring the additional areas into the plan through our efforts working with BT and the local communities.

“We understand the importance of improving connectivity in remote areas of Cornwall and the impact it can have on communities.

“We are really proud of our achievements this far and this additional coverage will be a vital economic and social advantage to some of those communities we thought we wouldn’t be able to cover in our current programme.”

He went on: “There is still work to do as the build continues until the end early next year.

“We have not forgotten about the 5 per-cent that aren’t included in our current programme and we are developing a new project to look at those areas over the next few years.”

Superfast director Ranulf Scarbrough said: “We are committed to making fibre broadband as widely available as possible.

“We will look at each area in turn to determine the best way to provide fibre broadband.

“It will be a combination of Fibre to the Cabinet (FTTC) and Fibre to the Premises (FTTP).

“Our team have worked really hard to meet the needs of businesses and residents and, in reaching these additional communities, are leading the way in Europe with rural fibre broadband infrastructure.

“Some of BT’s most senior directors and representatives from many other organisations across the UK and much further afield have paid fact-finding visits to Cornwall to see the pioneering work being carried out here.”

Liberal Democrat MP for North Cornwall Dan Rogerson said: “I’d like to thank Nigel Ashcroft and the team at Superfast Cornwall for working to make sure the funding for the scheme stretches further.

“The decision is a testament to the hard work and positivity of residents in the villages who looked for solutions and campaigned to bring much needed superfast broadband to local homes and businesses.”

Residents and businesses interested in connecting to superfast broadband can find out if they are able to order by checking their line HERE

This is straight from BT. But what’s your ‘Superfast’ broadband like? Let us know! Just post below

New Fathers for Justice protestor Bobby Smith was arrested this afternoon in Polzeath, where David Cameron is on a Summer break.

And he was joined by mothers whom the avaricious and indisputably unjust so-called ‘family law’ system has also targeted for their children.

Britain’s system of secret family courts incredibly does not countenance jury law. There are no rules of evidence, no press access, and within the so-called courts as a result there are daily human rights violations.

Bobby was briefly arrested last night for using a megaphone to call on David Cameron to come outside and talk to him.

Mr Cameron did briefly step outside and exchanged a few words with Mr Smith before returning to his holiday home, near Daymer Bay

He said ‘David Cameron stormed off after I started broadcasting my message about family courts

“Strange how quick he came out once we got the seats out and started eating fish and chips, 20 minutes lol.

““You’re ruining my holiday” he told me.

“Well I don’t have holidays with my children Prime Minister, and if if I had them back I wouldn’t be here.

“I won’t stop protesting and I won’t give up on my girls’

The relatively low profile protests mark a resumption of the classic campaigning tactics by which the original Fathers for Justice group kickstarted the the global fathers rights movement.

The civil rights campaign orchestrated a powder bombing of PM Tony Blair, the scaling of Buckingham Palace, invasions of the offices of abusive officials around the country and the bringing of Londons traffic to a halt with a crane occupation.

After a protest at Exeter Cathedral this year, an affiliated group, the ‘New’ Fathers for Justice campaign, with strength in the Northern and South Western regions, have taken up the mantle.

]]>http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2014/08/25/you-cant-hide-tory-boy/feed/1WESTERN GREYHOUND ‘UNRELIABLE': COUNCILhttp://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2014/08/23/western-greyhound-unreliable-council/
http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2014/08/23/western-greyhound-unreliable-council/#commentsSat, 23 Aug 2014 07:03:38 +0000http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/?p=20761Western Greyhound – the controversial local company who suffered a devastating arson attack at their Newquay depot last year and were embroiled in a bullying scandal when they tried to silence a CCN reader who complained of poor service – have lost a key bus route.

The council are now looking for a new operator for the 574/5 bus service between Callington and Tavistock.

A spokeswoman said the move ‘followed complaints from members of the public over the reliability of the buses’.

She went on: “This has resulted in the decision to terminate the contract with Western Greyhound and seek a new operator to take over the route.

“The authority has held a number of meetings with Western Greyhound to try and improve the situation but took the decision to end the contract when Western Greyhound admitted it was having problems in fulfilling the service.

“The service has now been put out to tender and a replacement operator will be put in place as quickly as possible.”

All council bus services subject to performance checks. The authority can step in if it feels the buses aren’t up to scratch.