LEAD
Action News Volume 7 No 4, 2000, ISSN 1324-6011Incorporating Lead Aware Times ( ISSN 1440-4966) and Lead Advisory Service News ( ISSN 1440-0561)
The journal of The LEAD (Lead Education and Abatement Design) Group Inc.

Lets face it  consumer
products are to blame for practically every lead poisoning case in the world  at
some stage or another in the life of the product, lead poisons people and the environment.

The biggest culprit for lead
poisoning the whole population is leaded petrol. And whatever lead is available to the
whole population does more damage in children. According to the NHANES research in JAMA
(Pirkle et al 1994), the percentage of US children aged 1-5 years with a
blood lead level above 10 µg/dL [the "acceptable level"], dropped from 85.0%
(in 1976) to 5.5% (in 1991) and the researchers attributed this massive decline
mostly to the reduction (by 99.8%) of lead in petrol in the same period. The minor
contributor was a change in another leaded consumer product  lead-soldered food cans
 which were replaced to a large extent by welded cans over the same period. The
remaining major cause of lead poisoning of US children is regarded to be a third consumer
product - leaded paint. Simply reducing the amount of lead in paint to a "safe
level" has the unfortunate result that while people think the problem has been
solved, in reality, the paint our governments have allowed in the past will plague us for
about another hundred years.

The classic argument put by
manufacturers of leaded products is that the contribution their leaded product makes to
lead poisoning and lead contamination, is less than some other product. This argument can
be used by the manufacturers of every product right up to the most hazardous or most
contaminating. And as long as each of the top two says They're not as bad as the other (ie
paint and petrol manufacturers), then everyone feels justified in using as much lead as
they need to keep their profits up.

Manufacturers that use smaller
amounts of lead hope that no-one will notice, eg candle manufacturers, while makers of
showy products get away with it because theyre so popular eg fireworks, bullets,
lead shot, sinkers and lead acid batteries in vehicles. Encouraged by our success with
banning lead core wick candles in Australia in 1999, The LEAD Group is aiming for three
very popular products in 2000  we seek: -

a phase-out of leaded petrol in
Australia by the end of 2000, and

a ban on lead, cadmium, mercury & arsenic (at
least) in fireworks used in the centenary of federation / new year celebrations on
31/12/2000, and

a worldwide ban on lead in the wicks
of candles by the end of 2000

You will have to wait until the next
issue of LEAD Action News to hear about the good things happening in the world to
phase out leaded petrol, as well as the beginning of what feels like it will be a torrent
of information on fireworks pollution. You have seen the sum total of Australia's
four recalls of leaded consumer products on the front page. Apparently, although the federal
minister has recall powers, Australian manufacturers usually undertake a voluntary recall.
Then, most importantly, we have in this edition of LEAD Action News, the good news
about Australia being the first country in the world to ban lead in the core of the wicks
of candles; followed by the US candle fiasco that should put an end to anyones trust
in industry voluntary bans. Lastly there's a huge section with the first instalments of my
reviews of what's happened in each of 6 government plans that have been written. In the
middle there's a general flurry of studies, articles and letters about leaded and other
toxic consumer products and who makes them, which help to remind us that: