Attention!!! Pro Sports Daily will be down on Wednesday morning from 5:00am - 7:00am eastern time for database maintenance. All Sports Direct Inc. properties will be down during this scheduled outage.
Sorry for any inconvenience that this outage may cause.

If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Global warming is the third liberal attempt to scare everyone into shifting from fossil fuels to new forms of energy.

Liberals tried acid rain first. This theory suggested toxic rain was going to kill everyone and pollute the world. When that scare tactic failed because it simply wasn't true, they moved onto the depletion of the ozone layer, which was ultimately proven false.

I guess the third times a charm.

I'm not against phasing in alternate forms of energy, but we need to drill in America during the implementation period.

I do not care for Al Gore telling me I have to conserve energy and drive around in a Toyota Prius, while he's flying around the world in his private jet and at the same time his energy bill for his home was over $30,000 last year.

Al Gore won a Nobel Prize for this ****?! I guess this is jsut another liberal example of do as I say and not as I do.

So you're biased, what else is new. Maybe you don't trust Al Gore. You might trust T. Boone Pickens, no? He's only got 60 years or so background in the energy biz. He's made a few billion along the way. You might consider him credible?

As for your question on carbon emissions -- I have no clue. I'm not an environmentalist. My assumption would be that increased carbon emissions (co1 and co2) are having an adverse effect on the global climate. I'd get in contact with a local science program and ask them that question. You may get a better answer.