Richard Spencer Says He Doesn’t Support Free Speech

Freedom of speech in America is sacrosanct to every law-abiding citizen. Well, expect for National Policy Institute Director Richard Spencer who popularized “campus free speech tours.” Spencer also popularized the term “alt-right,” and often complains about not being able to speak on college campus, but he is not a proponent of free speech, as he stated on his podcast last month on AltRight.com.

Spencer was one of the main organizers of the “Unite the Right” rally held in Charlottesville in August of last year, where he led a march of people bearing torches the night before, some of whom were shouting “Jews will not replace us” on the University of Virginia campus. The MSM reports that there were violent clashes with counterprotesters that unfolded the next day at a Charlottesville rally. I would refer anyone that wants to unmask what happened in Charlottesville to check out Renegade Broadcasting owner Kyle Hunt’s work.

Spencer has been on a college speaking tour since the rise of ZOG Emperor Trump, but for what?

Don’t wait for the drum roll! He was covering the stagnant topic of “free speech on campus.” It is a non-issue because the right to freedom of speech anywhere in this country is protected as a creator-endowed right by the highest authority, the 1st Amendment to the Bill of Rights of the Constitution. Because of that, Freedom speech is not open to debate.

These freedom of speech tours are meaningless dog and pony shows. It is also a tactic used by talentless hacks other than Spencer; these irrelevant jewish spokespeople include: Ben Shapiro, Milo Yiannopoulos and Dave Rubin.

You could say that I am a white Zionist.” ~ Richard Spencer

Spencer has sued universities for event cancellations on First Amendment grounds. There are too many of these cases where Spencer sues universities on the federal level, so I will only discuss the University of Cincinnati and Michigan State University cases in this article.

Back in January of this year a supporter of Spencer sued the University of Cincinnati, claiming the school’s president violated Spencer’s right to free speech.

“A price tag cannot be affixed to the fundamental right of free speech,” said Kyle Bristow, attorney for Spencer supporter Cameron Padgett, who had requested the venue at University of Cincinnati. “A speech tax does not comport with the United States Constitution and will not whatsoever be tolerated by my client.”

In the same month of this year, Michigan State University allowed Richard Spencer to speak on campus in March, after settling a lawsuit brought by a supporter. Bristow had these statements for the event.

“This is a resounding First Amendment victory for people of the right-wing or alternative-right political persuasion,” …. “It stabs at the very heart of left-wing censorship in academia. I look forward to procuring many more legal victories like this one in the years to come.”

Richard Spencer got his way and his speech at Michigan State was held on March 5, 2018.

The worst part about Spencer’s free speech campus tours is that he doesn’t really believe in the basic human freedom of expressing opinions, outside of those espoused by his Zio-Satanic spiritual leader Aleksandr Dugin.

“Richard Spencer: The Alt-Right Is Not Pro-Free Speech” By Jared Holt reported on May 23, 2018:

Last month, in an episode of the podcast affiliated with the now-defunct AltRight.com, co-host Gregory Conte, who works as director of operations at Spencer’s National Policy Institute, was speaking with Spencer about possible government regulation of social media in response to tech companies suspending alt-right activists from social media platforms. Conte said that he thought the alt-right would favor government regulation of speech in the short term, but seemed uncertain about what the alt-right would support long-term.

Conte asked Spencer, “Are we even pro-free spech?”

“No, of course not,” Spencer said. “But we have to use this platform in order—“

“So, we’re being radically honest, here?” Conte asked.

“Yes, radically pragmatic,” Spencer replied.

I supposed the US Congress should enact the same legislation that occupied “Germany” used on an 89 year old German woman named Ursula Haverbeck that got her tossed in jail (which could be a life sentence due to her elderly age), Freedom of speech, a basic human right, should be scrapped because it is for the benefit of Zionist-Stalinists like Spencer.

Our movement is analogous to the Bolsheviks.” ~ Richard Spencer

Soviet-Zionist agents like Dickie Spencer should be in a cell with those who imprisoned an old sweet lady for stating the obvious truth about the Holo-Hoax. That’s just me being “radically pragmatic”, Dickie.

Spencer is a snake crawling on his belly, leaving a trail of slime wherever he travels. Whatever good that you may hear from that hisssing vipers’ mouth about an “Ethnostate”, remember all that sweet pillow talk from the serpent is a means to an end, for the realization of a Soviet-Stalinist state where Dugin is the head of the Snake. In Dugin’s fanasty world there is no free human expression allowed. The Goyim’s lives will be devoted to working and plowing for the “Chosen” while they get fat off the Goyim’s labor, until the Goyim are no longer useful.

Donate to PNAG

Random Quote

"The genius of the Jews is to live off people, not off the land, nor off the production of commodities from raw materials, but off people. Let other people till the soil; the Jew, if he can, will live off the tiller. Let other people toil at trades and manufacture; the Jew will exploit the fruits of their work. That is his particular genius. If this genius be described as parasitic, the term would seem to be justified." -Henry Ford

*Antisemitism/White Supremacist Disclaimer

When you see the mention of “Jews” anywhere on this site, I am referring to people who practice the Jewish supremacist teachings of the Talmud, those who are actively participating in the undermining of European people’s governments, such as B’nai B’rith, the ADL, George Soros’ many foundations, immigration lobbyists, AIPAC, etc. I would say Zionists, but that would not be correct, what I really mean are Frankists/Sabbateans, sayanim and dual-citizen/dual-loyalty politicians. Antisemitism is a label used to slander anyone who exposes these issues of Jewish supremacism, the overuse of the term antisemitism has made it meaningless. To those who cry “white supremecist!” – For example, they label identitarians/alt-righters as white supremacists, when in reality we just see people as different, not superior and inferior. With Jewish supremacists, this is a case of psychological projection. According to the Talmud, when the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 Gentile(goyim) slaves. How can anyone who holds that as their end-goal call someone a supremacist?