Paul McCartney died in 1966 - replaced by Billy Shepherd

But are there any earlier videos of him mimicking other singers, because the believers could say that this is something that he didn't have till
after the death and that is why this guy was so believable because he could mimic others talents so well.

It's an irrefutable point. The reaction during that time of a McCartney death would have been unpredictable to say the least. The thought of
potential mass suicides definitely could have been enough to bring Lennon on board.

I think everyone knew that if they said anything there could be dire consequences. This is my guess but I think the family was paid off and I think
that there was also a threat of harm if anyone spoke out.

Regarding the Stones, they had their own "clue" song. Since they couldn't come out and say anything, they wrote a song called Ruby Tuesday
which many of us believe was written about Paul. Ruby Tuesday was Paul...Ruby for blood and Tuesday was the day of the week his body was found.
There's another reference to Tuesday in I Am The Walrus, "Stupid Bloody Tuesday." The song Fool On the Hill was about the time his
corpse spent there waiting to be found. I think it was about 8 or 9 days in September of 1966.

When you start thinking in terms of the Illuminati, there really are no holes in the story. Everything can be explained using that paradigm. Of
course, friends & family knew Paul had been replaced, but they're not going to just come out & say something. Did you see the interview w/ Heather
Mills saying she'd put evidence in a box & had given it to a friend in case something happened to her?

SednaSon, my initiation into PID was very similar. I remember reading a long time ago about it, how John called Faul "Faux Paul," or whatever. I
read that John didn't say "I buried Paul" at the end of Strawberry Fields Forever," but that he said "Cranberry Sauce." Ok, I believed that, but
if you go & listen to it, he actually does say "I buried Paul." Anyway, most of the arguments against PID focus on the hidden messages. The physical
evidence is what convinced me - comparing photos & videos, etc. It took me a while to see it b/c of my programming, but then something clicked, & I
could never see them as being the same again.

It's an irrefutable point. The reaction during that time of a McCartney death would have been unpredictable to say the least. The thought of
potential mass suicides definitely could have been enough to bring Lennon on board.

Yeah I agree. Also, Paul was the most popular with the ladies of all of the Beatles. He was probably the most popular male celebrity with the young
women in the entire world in the mid 60's.

Sorry but in this photo he is clearly blowing out he cheeks the "fake" one is as if about to let out air and that's the only thing that looks any
different.

The eyes, the nose, everything other detail is perfect.

With being involved with reconstructive plastic surgery quite a bit , that kind of thing was not possible back then.

You would need someone with the same SKULL sure you can manipulate the upper flesh of the face and maybe some nerves and a little micro vascular work
was possible then but you can't change someones eye sockets and nasal/audio passages.

Has anyone ever does a facial recognition test on the photos where they measure the distance between the eyes lips ears and nose?

Wouldn't she have noticed certain physical differences as well. The plastic surgery would have fooled someone facially but other characteristics
wouldn't.

She and Paul were having marital troubles and she was actually cheating on Paul with Billy Shepherd when the accident happened. So, Linda was glad to
go along with the charade. There was obviously a lot of money at stake!

Paul was engaged to Jane Asher in 1966. He married Linda Eastman in 1969.

Something that has become apparent in the course of researching this is that photos of Paul & Faul have been tampered w/ to make the 2 men resemble
each other more. Here is my favorite example. On the left is a screen capture of Paul in the Aug 19, 1966 Memphis interview. On the right is an
"official" photo from that interview. Can you spot the signs of tampering?

The quality discrepancy renders these images useless. And in the last image, there is at least 30 years in the difference that you are trying to
compare. You got Paul in his early 20's and approximately late 50's comparing them and saying they are not the same person.

It wouldn't make a difference, as it's not that he's really bloated he is simply just puffing his cheeks out like if you blow air into your cheeks
before sighing or whatever reasons people blow air into their cheeks.

Go look into a mirror, or take a picture of yourself, one with you normal and then they other with air in your cheeks you'll clearly see what I
mean.

How could plastic surgery been so damn good back then ?
When it's not even great now, I've dealt with reconstructive plastic surgery and I know that this isn't possible not even now.

I had "simple" things wrong with me that they could barely fix and the excuse of money can buy anything, money wasn't an issue with my surgery I
had the...well more then enough to pay for what needed to done and only then they could do very minimal experimental surgery for something that would
be seen as a piece of cake next to doing a total facial reconstruction.

Like I asked before, has there been any measurements done with the eyes nose mouth and ears?
That's something that could never be changed so if they are two different people they will clearly be different.
That would be proof to make me to start to consider the possibility.

The face is asymmetrical, so those two pieces of face put together mean nothing really, take a picture of your face and then mirror them you'll look
like a close relative of yourself.

Also he's manipulating his facial expression in the first half, clearly.

Also in these close up head shots we have no idea if he is standing, hunched over, or siting in either one, all effect posture length and position of
the neck effecting the height of the facial features in the photos.

a video of pictures that show a full body perspective that clearly show that facial traits and show the distance with the eyes ears nose and mouth are
the same also shows the age progression and how the younger Paul is in fact the older Paul we know now.

Terry Knight went to talk to Apple about doing a record in 1969. When he came back, he wrote "Saint Paul” - before the PID rumors started. This
single came out in May 1969 - five months before the first article on PID appeared. More mysteriously, "Saint Paul" is the only Knight composition
administered by Maclen Music - McCartney and Lennon's exclusive publishing company.

A double is a person who acts like another person, and who may have been cosmetically changed to look like that person. The Illuminati replaces people
with doubles. For many years, they recruited lookalikes who would serve their ends. An Illuminati Grand Master once told Cisco Wheeler, "never, never
think you are seeing who you think you are seeing."

Purposes of doubles:
1) make public appearances (political decoys or celebrity impersonators)
For ex, if a president only needed to do low level tasks in front of the public, they could have their double substitute for them.
2) take over [for ex, in case of death] so that the person’s powerful influence won’t be interrupted
3) create an alibi or frame up (espionage/crime)

There is an ongoing program to find lookalikes for prominent people. Plastic surgery has also been done to help touch up the doubles. [Fritz
Springmeier] There are lookalike contests often sponsored and used by those forces seeking to find doubles to play the parts of public figures. [There
was a Paul McCartney lookalike contest in 1965.]

A political decoy (or other impersonator) is a person employed to impersonate a politician, in order to draw attention away from the real person or to
take risks on their behalf. This can also apply to military figures, or civilians impersonated for political/espionage purposes. The political decoy
is an individual who has strong physical resemblance to the person they are impersonating. This resemblance can be strengthened by plastic surgery.
Often, such decoys are trained to speak and behave like their "target."

The entertainment industry is used to condition the public to accept the NWO. Celebrities are part of the mind conditioning of the masses. IF these
celebrities speak, their audiences will listen. The double may be under mind control and may actually think that s/he IS the replaced person.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.