If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Let's put it this way if the eagles were starting the 2011 season with an often injured Michael Vick do you think they should have held on to Kolb just in case or would they have been better off with Revis. I know that is easy in retrospect, but i would rather suffer through Rex while RG3 gets healthy and landing the best DB in the game instead of holding on to Cousins who could have a few bad games and lose some of this trade value.

no, thats B.S.. derelle revis is more valuable than any back-up on any team...
why did we get cousins??.. as insurance to RG3, which he is, and to get some trade value in the longhaul...

this is all hypothetically speaking anyways because its not like the jets are knocking on our door waiting for cousins to make the trade..

you are supposed to get the most value for a player while you can...eventually, cousins will be a starter in the nfl..why not get the most out of him now while its for the best defensive player in the nfl...

you can always draft a tyler bray or Ryan Nassib in the 4th round to replace cousins..

this team has shown it can win without RG3... if we have to play 6 games without him, derelle revis would help all the more to get wins in those 6 games

no, thats B.S.. derelle revis is more valuable than any back-up on any team...
why did we get cousins??.. as insurance to RG3, which he is, and to get some trade value in the longhaul...

this is all hypothetically speaking anyways because its not like the jets are knocking on our door waiting for cousins to make the trade..

you are supposed to get the most value for a player while you can...eventually, cousins will be a starter in the nfl..why not get the most out of him now while its for the best defensive player in the nfl...

you can always draft a tyler bray or Ryan Nassib in the 4th round to replace cousins..

this team has shown it can win without RG3... if we have to play 6 games without him, derelle revis would help all the more to get wins in those 6 games

Nassib is a possible 1st round pick and I'm not sure Bray will last that long either.

Trading for Revis is not a good idea in my opinion. We should continue to build the team through the draft with out bringing in spot free agents at a high cost or risk to the team. theres no way we should give of valuable draft picks for a player that is coming off of a serious knee injury, that my NOT every get back to his former self. we can not afford to lose focus on now. If your NOT getting better...than your getting worse!

Let's put it this way if the eagles were starting the 2011 season with an often injured Michael Vick do you think they should have held on to Kolb just in case or would they have been better off with Revis. I know that is easy in retrospect, but i would rather suffer through Rex while RG3 gets healthy and landing the best DB in the game instead of holding on to Cousins who could have a few bad games and lose some of this trade value.

NJrockPD <----- Best point

Revis would automatically give us 1-2 more wins a season, he just would. Cousins won't win as many as RGIII. I love Cousins and I understand the logic in keeping cousins, I'm just looking at the chess peices.

here's some food for though
lets just say shanahan pulls off a trade like he did for champ bailey and gets revis.. in haslett's scheme, where corners are asked to do a lot of 1on1s because of the exotic blitzes, revis would be the perfect puzzle piece...

orakpo, blitzers and kerrigan coming off the edge, and revis, wilson, and hall covering the WRs.....wouldnt that be a dream...

what would be even more awesome is if we drafted a guy like tyrann mathiew and had him doing a lot of blitzing where he thrived and almost won the heisman on in LSU....

Well, if RGIII isn't ready, you ready for Rex Grossman again? I can understand LOL.

Id be willing to have Grossman at QB for 1/2 a season if it meant we could have Revis for the next 6 years.

I dont think this redskins team is like the past few redskins playoff teams where they were good for 1 year then thats it. I think this team will be good for a while, and if it means trading our back up QB to land the best CB in the NFL arguably the best defensive player in the NFL, and all the salary cap numbers work out, i'd do it in a heartbeat.

here's some food for though
lets just say shanahan pulls off a trade like he did for champ bailey and gets revis.. in haslett's scheme, where corners are asked to do a lot of 1on1s because of the exotic blitzes, revis would be the perfect puzzle piece...

orakpo, blitzers and kerrigan coming off the edge, and revis, wilson, and hall covering the WRs.....wouldnt that be a dream...

what would be even more awesome is if we drafted a guy like tyrann mathiew and had him doing a lot of blitzing where he thrived and almost won the heisman on in LSU....

my imagination is running loose again..

If we did trade for Revis, at least 1 of wilson/hall wouldnt be on the team

If we did trade for Revis, at least 1 of wilson/hall wouldnt be on the team

if we packaged one in a deal, then yes...but, i doubt we'd just cut one them.. especially with hall wanting to take a pay-cut.. cover corners are very hard to find, and at worst, we would move hall to safety or the slot