Freeper: Romney "means well...any damage he does will be (a) less and (b) an unintended consequence"

To: Jeff Vader

Especially around here.

I’m with you— the enemy must be defeated. Those who say there’s not a lick of difference between W(M)R and BHO fail to recognize that W(M)R is not out to destroy, deliberately, his country, and that any damage he does will be (a) less and (b) an unintended consequence.

BHO is the enemy, and supporter of the enemies, of the USA. W(M)R at least means well.

(Have you seen my post that begins “In my dreams...”? I have repeated it and others have quoted it...)

7 posted on Friday, April 13, 2012 5:37:48 AM by ExGeeEye (Islam: a transnational fascist government that demands worship.)

7. He hasn't yet...

The post is still there...and there are a few replies:

To: ExGeeEye

I agree in that Romney is probably a well-intentioned socialist, but he is still a socialist... to simplify things even more, a socialist that loves to work is more damaging than a socialist that hates to work. If you think it is bad now, just wait until Willard shakes that etch a sketch after Labor Day.

8 posted on Friday, April 13, 2012 5:40:18 AM by wolfman23601

***

To: ExGeeEye

Agreed, but it’s real hard to vote when the choice is between a socialist and a communist - BOTH are bad, just one is worse sooner.

21 posted on Friday, April 13, 2012 6:09:05 AM by ctdonath2

***

To: ExGeeEye

If you think Mitt Romney is the one who can save America, or even slow its decline, I think you’re sorely mistaken.

Virgil Goode would get my support any day of the week. I’d hope he’d at least use some of it to redesign his web site, though; it’s downright embarrassing compared to almost any other candidate’s.