Since this fruit
requires dry soil, the main source of pomegranate in ancient times used to be
Afghanistan, which was part of India. Pomegranates
are drought-tolerant. In wet areas, they
can be prone to root decay from fungal diseases. They are tolerant to cold
temperatures as low as -13 deg C.

Queen Gandhari of
Mahabharata 4000 BC, was born in Kandahar, which is today an Islamic bastion.

The flowers, leaves,
bark, peel and the seeds of pomegranate are all edible and have potent
medicinal qualities.

The Vedas of 5000
BC , considers pomegranate is as a symbol of fertility and prosperity. Pomegranate along with coconut is an auspicious
item in Indian Hindu weddings.

Take it from Capt Ajit
Vadakayil that pomegranate was the ‘original forbidden fruit’ in the garden of
Eden. A large, dry pomegranate was found in the tomb
of Djehuty, the butler of Queen Hatshepsut in Egypt, and it went from India. 3000
years ago King Solomon designed his coronet based on the pomegranate's
"crown"./

Pomegranate is the most
powerful anti-oxidant of all fruits which protects against damaging free radicals.

In Kerala, we still
prefer to use the rind of this fruit to cure us of diarrhea, dysentery and
intestinal parasites, over modern western medicine. The peels or rind of pomegranate are
astringent and bitter in taste. Matalam
peels or pomegranate peels left to dry in the sun, are a common sight in any
Kerala home.

Let me list out the benefits
of consuming pomegranate as per 6000 year old Ayurveda :---

Pomegranate juice is
anti-bacterial and anti-microbial , to fight viruses and bacteria .

Boosts the immunity
system and has the highest potential among fruits to inhibit the transmission
of HIV. Its high content of anti-
oxidants stimulate the white blood cells to neutralize toxins in the body .

Helps in the
regeneration of cells in the epidermal and dermal layers of the skin and thus hastens the process of healing of wounds.

Pomegranate juice
application on oily skin prevents the outbreak of pimples and controls the
production of sebum. It slows down the
process of ageing by reducing wrinkles on the face caused by constant exposure
to sun. It regenerates the skin cells
and prevent hyper pigmentation.

Pomegranate juice aids
in the smooth functioning of the stomach, heart and liver. It is a good appetizer
and can control thirst.

It prevents anemia caused
by the deficiency of red blood cells in the body as it contains a good amount
of iron. Pomegranate seed extract supplies iron to blood and thus, help to
decrease the anemic symptoms including fatigue and hear loss.

Soothes the stomach,
and has a vital role in the secretion of
enzymes which aids proper digestion.

Prevents breast cancer
in women.

Diabetics can have this
juice as it does not elevate the blood sugar level as other fruit juices do.

Reduces dental plaque.

Pomegranate seed
extract prevents Alzheimer’s disease .

Prevents PMS depression
in women .

Pomegranate juice used
as eyedrops prevents the development of cataracts.

Decoction made by
boiling pomegranate peels are used for
gargling in case of sore throat and tonsillitis.

Roasted and powdered
pomegranate skin can be mixed with lime
juice and applied for soothing pimples, and
for removing black heads.

During my travels over
4 decades to Islamic countires I have asked hundreds of Muslim men .

Why do you circumcise your dick ?

All of them said because
it is mentioned in the Koran.

When I tell them that I
too have read the Koran and there is nothing mentioned in Koran about
circumcision, they try to argue and then keep quiet with a confused look.

Khitan or circumcision
is only mentioned in the Hadith — which also
includes circumcision, removing pubic hair, clipping the mustache, paring the nails, and plucking the hair under
the armpits.

How many percentage Muslims
do you see around the world with shaved upperlips?

The Five Pillars of the
Islamic Faith are - the profession of faith, daily prayer, fasting at Ramadan,
giving money to the poor (charity), and the pilgrimage to Mecca.

Muhammad the Prophet
was a very intelligent person, and he created laws for the survival of a “not
so bright” desert Bedouin community.

He made several laws
which even the most learned of Muslims do NOT know the reason why?

I am a Hindu and NOT a
Muslim.

From now on this post
if for educated Muslims who are Indians first. This post is NOT for people who are Muslims
first and then desh drohi Pakistanis.

I am sure NO educated
or uneducated Muslim wants his respected mother, dear sister or darling daughter
to be divorced by a man gone astray, just by saying TALAQ TALAQ TALAQ.

Or a Hindu man like
Dharmendra converting to Islam just because he wants to marry Hema Malini who
is more attractive than his first wife , without divorcing her.

Punch into Google
search-

CULTURAL WISDOM VADAKAYIL

Yes, taking four wives
had a social engineering purpose in those days .

Now , punch into Google
search-

OF PORK AND PIGS
VADAKAYIL

Like Muslims , Hindus
and Jews too do NOT eat pork.

Ever since the Babri
Masjid demolition even good desh bhakt Muslims see a conspiracy when a Hindu talks about
amending Muslims personal laws, to be congruent with the times.

Yes, India is a secular
country. SECULAR means treating all religions the same. Secular does NOT mean
that you kick the majority and pamper the minority in a selfish manner for
votes.

Muslims do NOT understand
why Hindus demolished the Babri Masjid. I am NOT a supporter of this demolition. But it has happened and there is NO point
crying over it. Moreover no namaz prayers have ever been conducted in this
structure, since it was built — never mind the SP propaganda.

Imagine Israel in all its
arrogant power, bombs Kaaba in Mecca and then uses the same stones to build a
synagogue on top of the existing foundation. And after 400 years the Muslims of Saudi Arabia
are in a condition where they can undo a past wrong, will they not do it?

Same way, Ayodhya for
Hindus is like Mecca.

Thought the waitress and
her coterie has kicked Hindus on their ehads and tried to prove that Lord Rama
and Ayodhya is just fiction , the rest of the world does NOT think so.

Before 7000 BC India
ruled the whole world.

South Korean tourist come
in droves to visit Ayodhya and their government also wanted to ADOPT Ayodhya,
which we did NOT permit.

Punch into google
search-

THE KOREAN BRAHMINS,
KIM HEO CLAN VADAKAYIL

and

BABRI MASJID DEMOLITION
VADAKAYIL

We cannot have
different rules in India for different communities. We recollect the incident where Simranjit
Singh Mann wanted to enter parliament with his sword. If so
Coorgis can carry guns into parliament.

If so if we can convert
to an Australian aborginee community and can welcome each other by shaking
their pricks instead of hands. Or we can convert ourselves to Eskimos and do
wife swapping merrily. Or we convert to some
Bantu tribe and carry bows and arrows into airplanes.

Finally is this not
what Dharmendra and Hema Malini has done?

How valid is Dharmendra’s
seat in Lok Sabha and Hema Malini’s seat in Rajya Sabha when their entry forms itself
are a big lie. Why have we allowed false
hood and chicanery to penetrate the Indian Parliament.

How valid is Hema
Malini’s daughter’s marriage ?

How many of you can
feel the mental agony of Prakash Kaur?

Check out their case.

Hema Malini fell in
love with her co-star Dharmendra during the filming of Sholay. She eventually kicked his wife Prakash Kaur on
her head and married him. Prakash Kaur
did NOT divorce her husband Dharmendra.

Before Dharmendra and Hema Malinin married, they both converted to Islam, though
the conversion was for convenience only for Hindus are not allowed second
marriage. Their marriage was solemnised on 21 August 1979 in Bombay in
accordance with Islamic rites.

While filing his
nomination papers as a BJP candidate before the returning officer, Dharmendra
had written his name as Deol Dharmendra Kewal Krishn concealing his Muslim name
Dilawar Khan and wrote the name of his first wife Prakash Kaur in the
respective column.

When his political
rivals brought the issue to the notice of election authorities and the general
public, Dharmendra lied through his teeth and denied his conversion to Islam
and change of name.

Lies in the affidavit
submitted on oath to the returning officer -- is this what is expected out of
an MP? BJP must sack Dharmendra and deny him a party ticket. Sections 420 (cheating), infringement of the
Hindu Marriage Act and Islamic Shariat law must be applied on both Dharmendra
and Hema Malini and their properties must NOT pass on to their children..

Hema Malini too has concealed her name vide
her marital status in her Rajya Sabha
form. Both of them have taken refuge in
the political spectrum—it is NOT that both are so found of the fish market
known as the Indian Parliament .

The magazine Outlook
published a photocopy of his Nikahnama (marriage document) which clearly said
that Dilawar Khan Kewal Krishn (44 years) accepted Aisha Bi R. Chakravarty (29
years) as his wife on 21 August 1979 at a mehr of, Rs 111,000 in the presence
of two legal witnesses…’ The nikah was solemnised by Maulana Qazi Abu Talha
Misbahi Faizabadi. .

Both the nikahnama
and the affidavit before the returning officer state his address as Plot number
22, Road Number 11 J.V.P.D. Scheme, Juhu, Mumbai—400049. The nikahnama also carries details of the maulvi
and eyewitnesses present on the occasion. A mehr of Rs 1,11,000 too is shown to
have been finalised between the two parties as the agreement for the nikah.

In an interview to
Outlook , Dharmendra lied again and categorically
denied he had changed his religion. "This allegation is totally incorrect.
I am not the kind of man who will change his religion to suit his
interests." When asked about the Congress charges, he had asserted:
"If there is any truth in this charge, let someone prove it with evidence.
If this a lie, let the public decide."

What do you mean let
the public decide. It is the Indian
judiciary who will decide if CHAAR SAU BISI has been done.

Polygamy is illegal in
India for Hindus and other religious groups under the Hindu Marriage Act. It
remains legal for Muslims under the terms of The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat)
Application Act of 1937, as interpreted by the All India Muslim Personal Law
Board.

And who are all these
Muslim mullahs and stalwarts who interpret the Muslims personal laws. Are they elected in a fair manner ? It is
because of these hardliners who re-interpret the Hadith as they please, that
Islam as a religion is put in bad light.

Why do we have
selective Islamic laws?

Koran wants the hand of
a Muslim thief to be cut off .

If we can
afford a Muslim TALAQ privelage why NOT
a chopped off hand? In future if any Muslim man with 4 wives steals-- let his hands be chopped off. Why cherry pick Sharia rules selectively for selfish advantage.

Why are we being
selective?

Narendra Modi, the BJP Prime Ministerial candidate of the BJP
started his poll campaign, calling for a Uniform Civil Code. India has two sets of Laws, General law and Personal Law.

General law is
applicable to all the persons who approach the Courts like the Criminal laws
including the Indian Penal Code and procedural laws like the Civil Procedure
Code, the Criminal Procedure Code and the Indian Evidence Act.

Personal laws are
special laws applicable to the persons in their private family affairs like
Marriage, Divorce, Adoption, Inheritance, Wills, Guardianship etc.

The Legislature has not
interfered in the personal laws applicable to persons following their religion
or the established customs and traditions.

Allah does NOT distinguish between men and women. The self proclaimed Islamic clerics are
ignorant about what the Koran has to say on the subject of women’s lives. The unelected
Muslim Personal Law Board is not representative of all Muslims, as they have
very few educated women in their organization.

Muhammed the prophet
introduced reformist Islam and Koran to uplift women. It was NOT his intention
to kick Muslim women on their heads.
Koran promotes gender equality gave women the right to divorce, re-marry, and work.

Muslim women like Shah
Bano have NOT argued against the Koran . Rather, they only plead for their
rights under Koran. Shah Bano was an old
Indian Muslim lady then in her seventies, now deceased, whose affluent lawyer husband
famously deserted her for a younger attractive woman and then sought to rely on
traditional Muslim law to refuse any
further responsibility for her welfare.

Shah Bano was kicked
out by her husband after 4 decades of marriage and several children. He claimed that
giving his old former wife the stipulated iddat money and the dower (haq mahr), together just a few hundred Indian
Rupees, fulfilled his legal obligations towards
her, relying on traditional Muslim law to exempt himself from any further liability.

Well before the Shah Bano case, however, the
increasingly activist Indian Supreme Court had already established in a 1979
case that a Muslim ex-husband would only be exempt from further payments to his
ex-wife if the payments were sufficient
for her “to keep body and soul together”.

What does our
Constitution say about Uniform Civil Code? In article 44, our constitution
clearly specifies this: "The State shall endeavor to secure the citizen a
uniform civil code through out the territory of India".

However, in response to
this, there exist-

Article 14 which guarantees the Fundamental Right of equality
before law.

Article 15 which
prohibits discrimination against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race,
caste, sex or place of birth .

Articles 25-29
providing religious and cultural freedom...

Article 13 of the
Constitution says that all laws in force in India at the time of the
commencement of the constitution, if repugnant to any of the fundamental
rights, have to cease to apply in any manner whatsoever.

Article 372 at the same
time requires that "all the laws in force in the territory of India immediately
before the commencement of this constitution shall continue in force therein
until altered or repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other
competent authority."

Article 15 requires non-discrimination based on
"sex". It goes against the Indian constitution when Muslim Personal
Law favours the man in cases of divorce and
polygamy. Equality before the law would essentially mean that Muslim
women could take up to four husbands.

BR Ambedkar while
making the constitution had an axe to grind with Hinduism.

Who was BR Ambedkar?

Punch into Google search-

CNN-IBN POLL GREATEST INDIAN SINCE MAHATMA GANDHI VADAKAYIL

Muslims who are NOT a
majority in other countries accept uniform civil laws where they do not
consider this as a personal defeat whereas in India it is. This is the result of the vulgar secularism. In India secularism is all about vote bank
politics. Indian Muslims vote for
Muslims candidates —in general.

Is it secular to have
different laws for different religion or it is secular to have a uniform law,
where all are equal ?

A uniform civil code
administers the same set of secular civil laws to govern all people
irrespective of their religion, caste and tribe. This supersedes the right of
citizens to be governed under different personal laws based on their religion
or caste or tribe.

Such codes are in place
in most modern nations,and in India only in Goa.

This was a sham by the
Portuguese, who tried to historically delete
their immoral and sadistic Goan Inquisition .

Punch into Google
search-

PORTUGUESE INQUISITION
IN GOA ORDERED BY FRANCIS XAVIER VADAKAYIL

Hindus, Sikhs, Jains
and Buddhists come under Hindu law, whereas Muslims and Christians have their
own laws. Muslim law is based on the
Sharia.

The Indian Mullahs try
to cling on to power. Once an UCC comes into force, nobody will care for them.
Even in Pakistan the 1961 Muslim Family Law Ordinance of Pakistan "makes
it obligatory for a man who desires to take a second wife to obtain a written
permission from a government appointed Arbitration Council" – superceeding the Shariat Act of 1937.

It is a shame that India has yet to learn from
Pakistan , how to protect Muslim women.

You will find moth
eaten faces like Shabana Azmi waiting in ambush like a spider, to hog the
limelight. Are we to assume that she
does NOT understand all this?

Where more than 80% of
citizens have already been brought under codified personal law, there is no
justification whatsoever to keep the remaining 20% in abeyance just for vote
banks.

Now let us apply our
collective commonsense to find out which article of the constitution must take
preponderence.. No intelligence or literacy is required here.

This is like the “Order
of Operations – BODMAS”

But, when you see
something like...

1 + 5 x 6 - 3 + (4 - 2)

... what part should
you calculate first?

Calculate them in the
wrong order, and you will get a wrong answer !

This is where BODMAS kicks
in !

B- Brackets first

O- Orders (ie Powers and
Square Roots, etc.)

DM- Division and
Multiplication (left-to-right)

AS- Addition and
Subtraction (left-to-right)

“Secular India” must
not interfere in the religious matters of various communities. However, a reverse point can be made as well
i.e. why should a secular India give such sweeping exemptions based on
religion?

Principle of secularism
means that state will not discriminate against individuals on the basis of
their religious beliefs or lack of it. But by instituting religion based personal
laws state is doing precisely that!

Is there NO
intelligence in our law makers or judiciary? Is there NO intelligent “think
tank”?

Can we made a BODMAS to
kick in UCC.

Article 44 is based on
the concept that there is no necessary connection between religion and personal
law in a civilised society.

We must honour Article
44 of the Constitution which states "the State shall endeavour to secure
for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India". The Constitution was
made in 1950, and 64 years had passed since it was promulgated, but Article 44
had been totally ignored by vested politicians—eager to appease Muslims for
vote bank politics . We must have one common
criminal law in india.

Marriage, succession
and like matters of a secular character cannot be brought within the guarantee
enshrined under Articles 25, 26 and 27.

Punch into google
search-

PERCEPTION AND
RELATIVITY VADAKAYIL

And read about 3
friends, 3 beers and the missing dollar.

To be frank our
constitution makers have nothing to be proud of. They
just did NOT have the perception to imagine a fu#kin' BODMAS.

We all know the great
tamasha of the Sania Mirza marriage, where
her Muslim Pakistani cricketer husband married his first Indian Muslim wife on--- “hold your breath” -- telephone!!

Everybody knows that Shoaib Malik left his first
wife Ayesha Siddiqui just because she
became fat.

Like the mullahs seem
to be trying to convey, UCC does not
insist people from one religion to start practicing rituals of other religions. All it says is, with changing living styles along with the time, there should
be a uniform civil code irrespective of all religions as far as social ethics
are concerned.

Hindus have accepted
changes in their personal laws with
grace. Child marriages were banned, Sati
was banned, widow re-marriage was encouraged, divorce was introduced, inheritance
laws were amended and Hindus accepted all these changes. They never complained
of hurting their religious sentiments like the Muslims.

Muslims in other
countries , where they are in minority accept uniform civil laws where they do
not consider this as a great defeat whereas in India it is. This is the result of the vulgar vote bank
politics.

During independence in 1947, all hardcore Indian Muslims were given
the free option of going to Pakistan. It
is NOT that they were never given a choice.
These people who decided to stay back in India and now crying hoarse
about UCC as an attempt to destroy “Muslim
Identity”.

The vast majority of Muslims
led by the Jumiat al-Ulama and other orthodox Muslim groups have fought tooth
and nail against any change to the Personal Law, and this includes educated Indian
Muslims too.

All this is despite Muslims being pampered and allowed to go on Haj
pilgrimage with government subsidy with taxes paid by majority Hindus. The
Muslim Madrassas which breed terrorists too are being subsidized by taxed paid
by Hindu majority. We do know of the inflow of Saudi Wahabi funds too for desh
drohi activities.

That “Secular India” must
not interfere in the religious matters of various communities is pure nonsense. Secular India must NOT give such sweeping exemptions based on religion, when a
Muslim man can marry four times , while men of other religions will be thrown
into jail .

A uniform civil code
doesn’t mean it will limit the freedom of people to follow their religion, it
just means that every person will be treated the same. This is the meaning of secularism, NOT
majority bashing or proving that majority is always wrong. .

All the laws related to marriage, inheritance,
family, land etc. should be equal for all Indians. This is the only way to ensure that all
Indians are treated same.

The biggest benefit is
that India will be rid of vote bank politics. Not having a uniform civil code is detrimental
to true democracy and that has to change.

UCC will cut the strength
from under the feet of the power drunk mullahs. Power is also an intoxicant. Islam prohibits intoxication. UCC is NOT about
Muslim bashing.

This change for the better
, especially for the Muslim women ( which is 50% of the Muslim population )
must come from within the educated sections Muslim community itself.

Even Islam allows a Muslim
who is hungry for three days to taken forbidden food.

Divorce should not be a
hasty decision and an impulsive or ego laden act. Sufficient
time is given to both parties to consider reconciliation before they finally
decide to part.

The Koran has been very
fair in this regard. Koran introduces several time capsule stages for
final separation, so that the married couple may reconsider their position
before jumping off the deep end.

Islamic divorce is to be pronounced thrice
after each menstrual period called “Tuhrs”. Repudiation must not take place during
menstruation. This provides enough time for
relatives to come from far off places , to intervene, counsel and protect the
interests of the helpless wife and children. In most of the Muslim countries divorce has
been made a judicial act.

When divorce is
initiated by the wife and the husband consents to it, divorce is known as
‘Khula’. In several Muslim countries, new laws have been framed to enforce this
con­cession given to women. But in India Khula has no legal sanction.

Islam does NOT permit
polygamy unconditionally. It is allowed only
when it helps the new woman and it is
more to help orphan girls and helpless widows.

Sameer Ali in his
“Spirit of Is­lam”, says, “You may marry two, three, or four wives, but not
more”. The subsequent lines declare, “but if you cannot deal equitably and
justly with all, you shall marry only one, (IV: 3).

India is still one one
of the only countries where Muslim women are rarely allowed to pray in mosques.
.

Marriages are not required to be registered, and sometimes made without women’s
consent.

Muslim women’s groups have
argued that since personal laws are uncodified, customary practices have
superseded the laws of the holy Koran.

It is high time, the
issue receives the serious consideration of our Ulema, and if they fail to see
reason they must be told to LUMP the UCC, with or without a pinch of salt.

In the olden days, yes these mullahs were
known to be Koran experts. Today anybody educated woman can download the
Koran on the internet and be an expert in one month flat—more so when women are
NOT allowed to participate in the Islamic decision-making process affecting their
lives and souls.

Muslim women must demand equality as enshrined in the Koran .

India is not an Islamic
country and in fact, has a secular code
for criminal law. If the Muslim
community has accepted a non-sharia code in one sphere, then logically, it
should be amenable to such a code in other spheres as well.

For a country to progress law be divorced from religion. Only then India will emerge as a much more
cohesive and integrated nation.

The mullahs will never
support the Muslim woman , as they stand to lose their falthu power. Muslim society became gradually feudalised and
women acquired a subjugated status only because of these selfish mullahs.

Can you imagine the
mullahs have been saying this –

Bernard Shaw has said (
sic !) “the laws of marriage and divorce
given by Islam are most suitable for our times.”

TEE HEEEE !

Bernard Shaw never said
that!!

George Bernard Shaw was
a Rothschild stooge who praised the Red Communist Bolsheviks and Jew Stalin. No wonder he got the Nobel prize and was
planted as a founder of the London School of Economics. He went all the way to
Moscow to meet Stalin in 1931.

Followers

About Me

Been in command of chemical tankers (mainly) for more than 6640 days -- spread over 30 years ( a world record! ) . My Chemical posts are free for ALL sailors on this planet . Any profit making person or institution publishing extracts, must clearly write " reproduced from ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com " , - it pays to remember, that the chemical contents are patented . This blogsite will transform your mind . You yourself, are the teacher, the pupil, the messiah, the seeker, the traveller and the destination . It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to this profoundly sick society . I am from INDIA, the mother of all civilizations . I will be re-writing world history , and this will surely not gratify the evil hijackers of human history . Awaken your inner voice . Experience the joy of your own being . Your own conscience is the best interpreter . In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act . The naked truth can never be hate speech or defamation. This blogsite does not sacrifice truth on the altar of political correctness . You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free . . STRENGTH AND HONOR - ALWAYS !.