Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:55:07PM +0200, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:16:40PM +0200, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>> you also should know what will happen with mov style w/h CORRECT cropping,
>>>>>>>>>> aren't you also mov.c maintainer ?
>>>>>>>>> well i think mjpeg after the 2nd patch from you will break with mov
>>>>>>>>> cropping, which would mean your 2nd patch is buggy
>>>>>>>> Well, it might break for cropping, but it is IMHO less buggy than
>>>>>>>> before, patch addresses an issue, and does not address the other issue,
>>>>>>>> but still height *2 is wrong.
>>>>>>> i dont know if its written in any docs but we have always rejected bugfixes
>>>>>>> which knowingly introduce other bugs
>>>>>> Why don't you send patches to common parts, which I will know will
>>>>>> introduce other bugs ? So you can experience that "rejected" feeling.
>>>>> iam maintainer of the common parts also you are free to complain if i break
>>>>> something
>>>> I did. You voluntary still ignore it and don't fix.
>>> i dont know what exactly you mean, could you tell me the subj/date of the
>>> mail where you complained?
>> Also now you got serveral bug reports related to code you maintain,
>> let's start counting time before the fix.
>> you can stop counting ive fixed the bugs, which where in my code (the last
> remaining one is introduced by a patch by someone else and simply reversing
> that patch will fix that one too)
Yes, thanks, but there is another bug, I just spotted and reported it.
--
Baptiste COUDURIER GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
SMARTJOG S.A. http://www.smartjog.com
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
Phone: +33 1 49966312