Here is another example of non-logic: “The ballot initiative passed last November by the voters of Maui County is illegal, because it set up a new law regarding commercial agriculture. Commercial agriculture is regulated by state and federal laws, which trump county laws.”

There are several ways of attacking this proposition, but the most basic way is:

The ballot initiative was not aimed at commercial agriculture. It called for a moratorium on all Monsanto/Dow experiments using non-commercial GMOs.

In what has become a federal court case, the judge and the lawyers for Dow/Monsanto are proceeding from a false basic premise.

Of course, the failure in this case is a willful assertion of the false premise.

There are a number of arguments afloat these days which proceed this way:

“The science concerning ABC is settled.”

“’Settled’ means ‘true.’”

“Therefore the science concerning ABC is true.”

However, on closer inspection, “settled” means “there is a consensus among officially favored scientists.”

Actual science doesn’t operate according to what officially favored scientists claim. It doesn’t operate according to consensus at all. It operates according to what is true and valid—and the best way to ascertain that is through the broadest possible analysis accomplished by a wide variety of independent researchers, who attempt to replicate prior experimental results.

For instance: what are the full tacit implications of the statement found at the end of every television drug ad—“ask your doctor if X is right for you.”

For instance, when the press reports a new outbreak of disease, claiming it is caused by a particular virus…how was that assertion determined? On what grounds do scientists say they have found the virus that causes the disease?

I ran headlong into that one while writing my first book, AIDS INC., and the further I investigated HIV as “the cause of AIDS,” the more I was stunned by the lack of logic present in the argument.

Logic is a sword.

Learning its many uses, while still young, creates formidable students and citizens.

Propaganda is the art of overwhelming logic.

It works, when the mind is unprepared.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

It is critical that your children be fully up-to-date on their logic immunizations before attending school. Many parents are becoming increasingly concerned that un-immunized children’s logical capacities might spread to their children. The community wants to ensure that our schools remain logic-free places, where children do not have to worry about being subjected to the threat of contagious, logical thinking.

You might argue that children who are immunized should not have to worry about those who are not, if the immunizations are actually that. The problem is, that would be logical, and that is exactly what we are trying to avoid. You see, logic immunizations only work if everyone who can be immunized is immunized. And that means everyone, because the only children who cannot be are so susceptible to logic that they must remain under cognitive quarantine and could not venture out to attend school anyway. We can then ensure that we have an illogical herd, which is collectively immune to logic, even though none of the individuals within it have actually been rendered immune to logical individuals. Yes, this is illogical, and that is exactly what we are striving to achieve.

If you have any questions about your child’s logic immunizations, please direct them to your cognition provider. Rest assured that he or she will do everything possible to protect your child from logic, no matter how logical you, the parent or guardian, may be. If you are concerned that un-immunized children present a threat to your immunized child, then we congratulate you on being fully up-to-date with your own logic immunizations.

If, on the other hand, you are so logical that you refuse to have your child immunized against logic, then that child will not be permitted to attend school, because he or she might introduce logic into the herd. This may cause members of the herd to become logical enough to realize that the school is not a closed system and that they come into contact with logic all the time. They may also realize that if your child’s logic can spread to them, then their immunizations did not work, so they themselves could have been bringing logic to school all along, and thus there never was an illogical herd. Furthermore, it might occur to them that the near elimination of various forms of logic in our society had little or nothing to do with immunizing against logic, but was instead a result of cognitive sanitation and a diet richer in propaganda.

So please, join the herd and help us in our ongoing battle against the spread of infectious logic. Make the informed choice that you are not allowed to make for your children and other people’s children. After all, other parents cannot choose for themselves if you do not choose for them.

Thank you for your inattention,

Sincerely Ours,

The Archbishop of Science for the Centers for Thought Control and Prevention