Not sure Phil likes the PG Westbrook. I dunno I just heard from Laker fans how he'd detest having a PG like Sessions or Westbrook, those new pgs. They do have Fisher so maybe he'd play Westbrook mostly at the two then :s
They also have no post players... isn't that the key for the Triangle Offense?

Westrook is more of a slasher.
a PG that can knock down the outside shot consistently would work better.

Yup. Westbrook can be like Kobe in the triangle. Obviously not as good, but still. They would need a PG who can shoot spot up threes and is a smart player. Triangle requires high bball IQ and good passing ability. That's why Fisher was so effective in the triangle, because he could shoot, was smart, had the ability to make an entry pass into the post, and wasn't afraid to take the last shot.

You don't need a traditional PG for the triangle, just a player who has those abilities I mentioned.

The Thunder are one of the youngest teams in NBA history to make the finals and were 3 wins away from being champions and people are already talking about what they do wrong? If you just left the team alone, aside from a couple of minor changes that might have to be made for financial reasons, you've got a beast team for years. Some of you want to risk messing all of that up?

I'm not entirely convinced that they are automatically better with Westbrook being moved to SG. They already have a top 3 offense in the league. Some of you don't seem to understand that. If anything, there defense needs to improve just a little bit, so they can get key stops. If you move Westbrook to SG, Sefolosha will be coming off the bench and probably playing fewer minutes. So any PG you get needs to not only be making sure Westbrook and KG maintain their touches, but also give you something on defense so that you're not losing a lot on that end.

With the exception of the last one, they were in those games against Miami. It was close. The difference does not require a massive change.