Welcome to Medical News Today

Healthline Media, Inc. would like to process and share personal data (e.g., mobile ad id) and data about your use of our site (e.g., content interests) with our third party partners (see a current list) using cookies and similar automatic collection tools in order to a) personalize content and/or offers on our site or other sites, b) communicate with you upon request, and/or c) for additional reasons upon notice and, when applicable, with your consent.

Healthline Media, Inc. is based in and operates this site from the United States. Any data you provide will be primarily stored and processed in the United States, pursuant to the laws of the United States, which may provide lesser privacy protections than European Economic Area countries.

By clicking “accept” below, you acknowledge and grant your consent for these activities unless and until you withdraw your consent using our rights request form. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.

Please accept our privacy terms

We use cookies and similar technologies to improve your browsing experience, personalize content and offers, show targeted ads, analyze traffic, and better understand you. We may share your information with third-party partners for marketing purposes. To learn more and make choices about data use, visit our Advertising Policy and Privacy Policy. By clicking “Accept and Continue” below, (1) you consent to these activities unless and until you withdraw your consent using our rights request form, and (2) you consent to allow your data to be transferred, processed, and stored in the United States.

Register for a free account

Execution by Lethal Injection Is Not Humane or Painless

Published
Sunday 17 April 2005 Published Sun 17 Apr 2005

Adapted Media Release

Prisoners executed by lethal injection in the US may have experienced awareness and unnecessary suffering because they
were not properly sedated, concluded a research letter in last week's issue of The Lancet. The authors believe the use of
lethal injection should cease in order to prevent unnecessary cruelty and a public review into anaesthesia procedures during
executions is necessary.

Lethal injection is the most common way people are legally put to death in the USA. It has eclipsed all other methods of
execution because of public perception that the process is relatively humane and does not violate the US Constitution's Eight
Amendment prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment. Anaesthesia during lethal injection is essential to minimise suffering
and preserve public opinion that lethal injection is a near-painless death. Lethal injection generally consists of the
sequential administration of sodium thiopental for anaesthesia, pancuronium bromide to induce paralysis, and finally
potassium chloride to stop the heart and cause death. Without anaesthesia the person would experience suffocation and
excruciating pain without being able to move.

Leonidas Koniaris (University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, USA) and colleagues analysed protocol information from the
states of Texas and Virginia, where around 45% of executions are done. They found that executioners-typically one to three
emergency medical technicians or medical corpsmen*-had no training in anaesthesia, drugs were administered remotely with no
monitoring of anaesthesia and there were no data collection, documentation of anaesthesia, or post-procedure peer review.
They also noted that neither state had a record of the creation of its protocol. The investigators also analysed data from
autopsy toxicology reports from 49 executions in Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. They found that
concentrations of thiopental in the blood were lower than that required for surgery in 43 of the 49 executions; 21 inmates
had concentrations consistent with awareness. The study suggests that the current practice of lethal injection for execution
fails to even meet veterinary standards for putting down animals.

Dr Koniaris states: ?Our data suggest that anaesthesia methods in lethal injection in the US are flawed. Failures in protocol
design, implementation, monitoring and review might have led to unnecessary suffering of at least some of those executed.
Because participation of doctors in protocol design or execution is ethically prohibited, adequate anaesthesia cannot be
certain. Therefore to prevent unnecessary cruelty and suffering, cessation and public review of lethal injection is
warranted.?

In an accompanying Editorial The Lancet comments: ?Whether you receive the death penalty depends not on what you have done,
but where you committed your crime, what colour your skin is, and how much money you have. The use of the death penalty not
only varies from state to state (12 US states have no death penalty) but from jurisdiction to jurisdiction within a state.
Repeated studies have shown a pattern of racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty.

?Capital punishment is not only an atrocity, but also a stain on the record of the world's most powerful democracy. Doctors
should not be in the job of killing. Those who do participate in this barbaric act are shameful examples of how a profession
has allowed its values to be corrupted by state violence.?

2019 Healthline Media UK Ltd. All rights reserved. MNT is the registered trade mark of Healthline Media. Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a healthcare professional.