Take Your Best Shot: The Moon Landings Were A HOAX!

On front screen projection: If you have a big enough, nonreflective, screen, you should be able to get the illusion to work. You would just need to
project the colors that, when combined, will be close enough to black to create the illusion.

On the radiation: There is no way anyone can argue with numbers that come from the very people who perpetrate the "hoax".

I put hoax in quotes, because I do not know if it is a hoax or a fact, and, tbh, I don't really care if it was a hoax or not. Thus, explaining my
lack of effort in the other posts. My original post was just to give you some ideas to play with.

And no, i do not believe there is any good reason for abstaining to swear on the bible if they actually DID go to the moon, especially when there is
5k attached, as well as the opportunity of shutting up most of the moon hoax-believers all in one fell swoop.

Why would 5k matter? They could show up to a birthday party, shake hands and get more than 5k for appearance fee....

"we can't take pictures of the moon landing area or the flag as a telescope couldn't see it" Bull

Well I posted this in the other thread, so it's not much trouble to post it again, even though it probably wont satisfy...

I'm sorry man, but those are really laughable...from a point of offering them as proof of the event.

If I were to offer pics like these as evidence to some hard core debunker of conspiracy theories, this is what he would have said:

1. pics are too blurry to see anything of substance
2. dead pixels or lens flare/reflection, uneven ground, shadows (for the white rectangular part in the antares 3x enlarged pic)
3. probably a natural formation we still know nothing about (lines)

Now, I'm not saying they are, I'm simply saying, apply your critical thinking toward your case also. Demand what you demand from the conspiracy
theorists. Hard core, clear, undeniable, raw proof. These LRO pics are certainly not such proof. You come from a stand point of already "knowing"
and mentally accepting we went there, and it's easy for you to accept them, but would you accept them as proof If you never heard of a man going to
the moon?

DJ, I would be interested to know if you have watched the film, "Kubrick's Odyssey". If so, I would be even more interested on your thoughts about
what facts the film presents and about how plausible the things it only suggests are, in your mind.

I know for me, this film was an eye opener and not in the sense of OMG the moon landings are definitely fake because there are no tracks around that
rover or OMG the flag is swaying, so fake but more in the sense of circumstance, motive and need.

This film doesn't deal in age old hoaxes that have been beaten to death a million times already and if you haven't seen it, I would suggest the
watch, it's an hour of time that may be well spent if for no other reason then to give you something else to "debunk".

Why not do it for free...you are the bearer of the truth...you have been to the Moon...a man challenges you to swear on the Bible that you did go
there.

I would never shy away from the truth...nobody would if they think they are truthful. It's instinctive. Swear on it, and tell the man he can keep his
money. You walk away a big man. Big Kahuna.

And you pander to people making money off slandering your accomplishments on a daily basis. Those who profit off this kind of thing are never happy.
They rarely offer anything up to say, "Well if this was the case, I would change my position."

On the other hand, I haven't seen anything conclusive enough to doubt the moon landings. So I will believe they happened for now...

I'm sorry man, but those are really laughable...from a point of offering them as proof of the event.

If I were to offer pics like these as evidence to some hard core debunker of conspiracy theories, this is what he would have said:

1. pics are too blurry to see anything of substance
2. dead pixels or lens flare/reflection, uneven ground, shadows (for the white rectangular part in the antares 3x enlarged pic)
3. probably a natural formation we still know nothing about (lines)

Now, I'm not saying they are, I'm simply saying, apply your critical thinking toward your case also. Demand what you demand from the conspiracy
theorists. Hard core, clear, undeniable, raw proof. These LRO pics are certainly not such proof. You come from a stand point of already "knowing"
and mentally accepting we went there, and it's easy for you to accept them, but would you accept them as proof If you never heard of a man going to
the moon?

Would they convince you?

Yeah I'm aware that conspiracy believers won't accept these, but it's often said, 'why isn't there a photo of the landing sites'. Well, there is
one. That they don't choose to believe it is not my problem.
And it's more in combination with the other activity of the moon landings that is the proof to me. But I'm not emotionally invested in believing it
was all fake in the first place unlike they are, and that's the biggest block to any evidence.
Maybe when remote control probes are real cheap and a good quality live stream can be organised, that might convince. But you have to convince them at
every step of the way it's a real probe, actually happening, or they'll just say the live stream is faked.
They'll have to watch the rocket take off from earth, look at pictures taking a live picture of earth, which can be confirmed by cloud patterns and
current weather conditions, be sitting in on the mission every step of the way. It's a lot of trouble to go to just to cure someone's reality
delusion.
Maybe there's some kind radio telescope capable of a spectropic analysis that can show the materials from the missions are on the moon? Maybe that's
a less troubling way of proving it.

Originally posted by delusion
They'll have to watch the rocket take off from earth, look at pictures taking a live picture of earth, which can be confirmed by cloud patterns and
current weather conditions, be sitting in on the mission every step of the way. It's a lot of trouble to go to just to cure someone's reality
delusion.

Even that will not cure their delusion, they will just claim it is CGI, or NASA flew a secret mission just to plant the stuff!. They are not at all
interested in reality. As can be seen here, where every silly claim they bring up is destroyed with facts.

Wait, Steven Greer said he saw the video of this? I know he believes it but I didnt know he saw video. ( or did he ?) This is a very interesting
"story" told about the lunar landings. Not true of course but interesting.

Dont believe everything you hear. And these guys were all well paid for what they did. They didnt need to swear to anything for money. They got paid
and they got famous because they risked their lives. NASA would not endeavor this project today with the technology they had back then. Its too
dangerous. Here truly was a case where they didnt know what they didnt know.

The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.