Impact of Intended Mode of Delivery on Outcomes in Preterm Growth-Restricted Fetuses

Author Information: Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, School of Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

Abstract

Scheduled cesarean is frequently performed for fetal growth restriction due to concerns for fetal intolerance of labor.

Objective

We compared neonatal outcomes in preterm growth-restricted fetuses by intended mode of delivery.

Study Design

We performed a retrospective cohort study of indicated preterm births with prenatally diagnosed growth restriction from 2011 to 2014 at a single institution. Patients were classified by intended mode of delivery. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes, including perinatal death, cord blood acidemia, chest compressions during neonatal resuscitation, seizures, culture-proven sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and grade III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage. Secondary analysis was performed examining the impact of umbilical artery Dopplers.

Results

Of 101 fetuses with growth restriction, 75 underwent planned cesarean deliveries. Of those induced, 46.2% delivered vaginally. Delivery by scheduled cesarean was not associated with a decreased risk of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-5.78), even when only those with abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers were considered (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.40-20.2).

Conclusion

In this cohort, planned cesarean was not associated with a reduction in neonatal morbidity, even when considering only those with abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers. In otherwise appropriate candidates for vaginal delivery, fetal growth restriction should not be considered a contraindication to trial of labor.