WUSB should become the de-facto standard for high-speed wireless data traffic, and as such I see this as an embedded feature, not an expansion slot/device/..

WUSB should become the de-facto standard for high-speed wireless data traffic, and as such I see this as an embedded feature, not an expansion slot/device/..

Bye Martin (aka Barnasc)

Bye Martin (aka Barnasc)

+

+

You also replaced some text: "Chipsets suitable for a phone are likely to take some time to be available."

+

Not true.

+

Google a bit and you will find that Nokia introduced this already at the 3GSM. Other companies are working also on mobile versions.

Revision as of 20:32, 27 March 2007

I disagree to move the WirelessUSB section to the expansion section. What is the reasoning behind this?
WUSB should become the de-facto standard for high-speed wireless data traffic, and as such I see this as an embedded feature, not an expansion slot/device/..
Bye Martin (aka Barnasc)

You also replaced some text: "Chipsets suitable for a phone are likely to take some time to be available."
Not true.
Google a bit and you will find that Nokia introduced this already at the 3GSM. Other companies are working also on mobile versions.

Views

Personal tools

I disagree to move the WirelessUSB section to the expansion section. What is the reasoning behind this?
WUSB should become the de-facto standard for high-speed wireless data traffic, and as such I see this as an embedded feature, not an expansion slot/device/..
Bye Martin (aka Barnasc)