One in three secondary schools is forcing children to swipe their fingerprints just to register in class or take out library books, it emerged yesterday.

Figures diclosed under the Freedom of Information Act show how ’Big Brother’ technology is becoming widespread in schools.

Thirty per cent of high schools are taking fingerprints simply to speed up basic administration such as borrowing books, registering in the mornings and buying canteen lunches.

It means tens of thousands of pupils have had their prints taken at school.

In some cases, schools are taking fingerprints without first gaining parental consent.

The Mail revealed this year how pupils at a North London comprehensive were ’frogmarched’ to be fingerprinted.
Capital City Academy provoked uproar after failing to first seek parents’ permission.
It was later forced to apologise and wiped all prints it obtained before asking for consent.
Education Secretary Michael Gove has pledged to ban schools from fingerprinting pupils unless they have first obtained explicit parental permission.

Alex Deane, director of campaign group Big Brother Watch, said: ’The use of fingerprinting in schools is disproportionate and intrusive - in some cases, parents aren’t even asked whether they agree with it.

’Schools are not equipped to hold this sort of unique and personal data.

’By taking it for trivial purposes schools are jeopardising the privacy of the students for the rest of their lives.’

Responses given by 27 councils under Freedom of Information legislation show that 111 secondaries are using fingerprint technology.
Meanwhile 84 primaries were also found to be using fingerprint technology.
Other councils were unable to provide figures, claiming schools were under no obligation to notify them of systems used.

But replicating the received responses across the country’s 150 local education authorities reveals that 30 per cent are likely to use fingerprint systems nationally.

In some areas, the figure is far higher.

Of councils which replied, South Tyneside has the highest proportion of secondary schools using biometric technology, with 89 per cent.
And Portsmouth has the most primary schools using the technology, at 13 per cent.
The Coalition has criticised current rules which state heads do not currently have to gain parental consent before implementing the systems.

The Information Commissioner’s Office states: ’There is nothing explicit in the Data Protection Act to require schools to seek consent from all parents before implementing a fingerprinting application.

’However, unless schools can be certain that all children understand the implications of giving their fingerprints, they must fully involve parents in order to ensure that the information is obtained fairly.’

But critics claim the vague wording allows civil liberties to be abused.

Hank Roberts, an executive member of the Associaton of Teachers and Lecturers, said: ’It’s outrageous that children’s fingerprints can be taken without parents’ consent.

’I think it’s completely and fundamentally wrong.’

Schools insist biometric systems are not a concern because they do not store children’s actual fingerprints.
The finger scan machines create a mathematical algorithm which cannot be converted back into an image of a fingerprint.
Research earlier this year uncovered a growing trend for schools to use CCTV cameras to monitor children’s behaviour as well as biometric administration systems using iris or face recognition.

Children are being monitored as closely as inmates in prisons by scores of covert cameras, according to research by Dr Emmeline Taylor, of Salford University.
The vast majority of secondary schools use more than 20 CCTV cameras to capture children’s movements in corridors, playgrounds and even the toilets.
But many are breaking the law by failing to make it clear to pupils where cameras are located and how the images might be used.

At least one unnamed school had installed cameras with microphones in classrooms and corridors and given staff earpieces to listen in on conversations.

School Textbook: “There’s No Such Thing as Reverse Racism” Only White People can be Racist2015-03-03 2:14
Only white people can be racist.
A school textbook teaches students that “there is no such thing as reverse racism” and that women can never be as sexist as men.
The passage, which appears to be taken from a “multicultural education series” book entitled Is Everyone Equal, states, “STOP: There is no such thing as reverse racism or reverse sexism (or the ...

Americans to Receive Full Biometric Treatment for all Forms of European Travel2015-03-02 23:39
Travel becomes truly ominous...
In a trend that isn't wholly surprising, EU Observer reports:
US citizens and other non-EU nationals who enter Europe will be asked to have their faces image-captured and fingerprints scanned upon arrival at a half-dozen major airports. [emphasis added]
This "biometric dragnet" is the pilot test for the EU's new "smart borders" packages. The test ...

Breaking: Google gives new meaning to “Orwellian” 2015-03-02 18:14
Becomes Ministry of Truth
“…if all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history and became truth.” (1984, George Orwell)
The New Scientist has the stunning story (2/28/15, “Google wants to rank websites based on facts not links,” by Hal Hodson):
“THE internet is stuffed with garbage. Anti-vaccination websites make the front page of Google, and fact-free ‘news’ stories ...

Boris Nemtsov, Putin Foe, Is Shot Dead in Shadow of Kremlin - A Staged Shooting?2015-02-28 22:37NY Times: Boris Nemtsov, Putin Foe, Is Shot Dead in Shadow of Kremlin
Mr. Nemtsov, a former first deputy prime minister of Russia, was killed in central Moscow in the highest-profile assassination in Russia during the tenure of President Vladimir V. Putin.
A Staged Shooting?
...
Why does the dead body of fitness enthusiast Boris Nemtsov have a pot belly?
The Anti-New York Times doesn't ...

Spielberg's Hoax - The Last Days of The Big Lie2015-02-28 20:18Editor's Note: This is an absolutely SHOCKING video. How this has gone largely unchallenged for such a long time, is a remarkable testimony to the trustworthiness of gullible but good-hearted people. Watch it all the way to the end and learn something new about the remarkable lies and falsehood in our world.
If the video is blocked in your country, see ...