For example, from TSC Strategic Initiative Dashboard measures, in the WGM minutes: Strategic Initiative measures 4.2.8, .9, .10 are all on cross-artifact consistency to identify measurements for cross-artifact consistency for 2011 and .9 the plan for 2012, and .10 for 2013 in three-year plan

ArB - Charlie reports 'The update is that the ArB has defined a schedule to produce for the TSC the promised V1 of SAIF (revised text from Information ballot that passed in the last cycle) and candidate V2 of SAIF to be submitted for DSTU ballot in the September ballot cycle.'

Austin clarifies that this is essentially a revision to the existing DSTU

Vote: Unanimously approved.

Discussion topics:

(May) Review, update, and develop new entries for TSC Three-Year Plan

For example, from TSC Strategic Initiative Dashboard measures, in the WGM minutes: Strategic Initiative measures 4.2.8, .9, .10 are all on cross-artifact consistency to identify measurements for cross-artifact consistency for 2011 and .9 the plan for 2012, and .10 for 2013 in three-year plan

Do we want to provide any further feedback on the Strategic Initiatives, and by when?

Austin thinks we need to create a plan to do this review, perhaps even create a project. Austin and John will work on a project for this, with staff support. Draft to the TSC in a week or two.

WG has a DMP based on review of the updated template, for 2011May (Tracker # 1732) - in effect this cycle.

Ed asks that a DMP review in the past 12 months should be sufficient even if not the most recent template. Lynn clarifies that the DMP template on the metric was published from 2010May and being scored as of 2011May.

Work Groups responding to submit meeting room request form before the deadline. (Tracker # 1946

This deadline is just a week after the WGM. Calvin would like to see two weeks for cochairs to respond to the meeting space request.

This measure and the first measure seem like they would be the best ones to add, notes Austin. Ed feels a general project health score, cumulative to all the project health measures, would be appropriate on the Work Group Health. Woody notes that we meant to start project health as a helpful tool to manage their projects, not as a score card. For now we want work groups to use project health as a tool and somewhere down the line we might incorporate that into work group health scoring. Austin and Ed agree.

We may not necessarily need to tweak anything at this point to continue to make things visible.

Austin summarizes to say that nothing on this list is really jumping out to be added. Accepted by general consent.

Strategic Initiative feedback- does the TSC wish to offer any further feedback?

Do we want to provide additional formal feedback to the Board on Strategic Initiatives? The TSC agreed in Orlando to develop some sort of dashboard for measures the TSC has control over. Ken feels we should let the Board know we are actually responding to the initiatives. We should let them know we’ll be working on a dashboard. Austin thinks that we should create the project statement first and then use that to communicate the TSC’s intent to the Board. ACTION ITEM: Austin and John to draft the project for the SI Criteria Measure Dashboard.

Ken notes that Project Services also had a balloting guidance chart. TSC has not reviewed that document. Woody notes that neither document really addresses the question TSC’s been asked for how to tell Work Groups to choose their ballot level. Dave’s document has a section for each kind of ballot versus the standards types. Lynn will re-send both documents to the TSC list. We may be looking at a new document that incorporates both of these. One might triage your ballot artifact type from Ed’s list and then go to Dave’s list to figure out what you have to do.

Bring the documents back next week and figure out how to merge them. There is little on next week’s agenda so far, we may be able to provide some time to discuss.

ArB - Charlie reports 'The update is that the ArB has defined a schedule to produce for the TSC the promised V1 of SAIF (revised text from Information ballot that passed in the last cycle) and candidate V2 of SAIF to be submitted for DSTU ballot in the September ballot cycle.'

Adjourned 11:49 AM EDT.

Next Steps

Actions(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)

Austin and John will work on a project for the TSC Strategic Initiative Measures Dashboard, with staff support.

Lynn will re-send both the Ballot Guidelines revised document from Ed and the Project Services ballot guidance documents to the TSC list for review on next week’s call.