Scrilla PR doesn't look GREAT. Especially since it appears that there isn't an R2D2 one, which you'd think would be a PR before C3PO. I don't know Scrilla at all hardly though so don't know if this is the sort of thing he likes to do. Magic seems to think he would fake it though. In saying this, C3PO is pretty much a certainty yes? I don't see CP making it a fake claim as it is unfair to town and sort of disregards the entire character side of the game, though didn't someone say that CP likes to do that. Damn, I'm going in circles.

Ziggler has been all over the place this phase in terms of flip flopping etc. Think he called someone out on doing the exact same thing at one point. Probably Ziggler being Ziggler, still noted. Magic with those interactions with both Doc and Ziggler, don't really see them being of any help when any of them flip though. Not sure if Magic likes to associate himself with his scum mates.

Magic, Mr and Doc all seem town, MDP too for his Scrilla vote.

Speculation on characters etc is pretty pointless until someone actually character claims at which time those Star Wars nerds can come in handy. Personally I've only seen the main 6 movies, so I know next to nothing.

Did we confirm whether or not ICame2Play did have that beeping PR, that would help my top paragraph. Sorry, unlike me to have to ask back for not reading, though I did have to read 500 posts and may have missed it.

umm, this multi quoting of someone's entire post history trend seems to have started when I did in a couple of games(not trying to be arrogant, legit didn't really see anyone doing it beforehand) and I'm just going say it doesn't really work on day 1 as there's usual not enough to go off of. First impressions are great for later on in the game, but it's really hard to say someone in particular is scum based solely on the fact they've posted nothing but fluff when that's what most of players have done. I know I did this with ZIGGLER, but he just seemed off to me and still does, especially his response to my post where he said he's going to try to prove his innocence when that's really not what town should be going for when playing.

Honestly, they have been happening for a long time when players attempt to build "cases". Usually is a bit of a cop out though as the majority of the quotes posts tell absolutely nothing whatsoever but can work especially when players just skim the thread and bandwagon.

He won't do anything without us getting info. He won't contribute to the game at all. Let's take a shot and see what happens.

Found this scummy at first, but then remembered this is your go to Day 1 move, I like your attitude too, and I agree with most things you say as you are heavily obviously pro town when town much like myself. I don't agree with this though, picking someone out at random is not a good idea, and we don't want it resulting in scum just getting claims out of whoever they want. Even if someone has made only one iffy post, it's better than this. sXe for example Crumbles when fake claiming, though he did get us in Smiley...

No double voter is NOT always town. It's not a good idea to link roles to alignment. You'll probably wind up being wrong.

Early on in the game though you can still make assumptions and generally double voter IS town. You can't confirm the alignment of a double voter, but at this point you are better of believing their innocence, one less distraction. If they are scum they will be lynched eventually.

Scummy, trying to get Roger hammered. Speaking of, Sterling's claim is all well and good, however they way he went about it was beyond scummy. His refusal to claim was strange + idiotic. Right now though, the former outweighs the latter.

how can interaction be fake if it's not planned? Talking to scum teammates shouldn't be considered fake. It isn't really hard to interact with them as you know none of it will be very meaningful unless bussing is happening. I'm just saying it's hard for people to actually figure out a fake interaction from a real one, like usually when people accuse me of it they're completely wrong. it's fine if you disagree though, it just means we have different methods of scumhunting.

I also can't wait to hear Nov's thoughts on the game thus far, he's been really good lately.

thinking about if anyone tried to look townish by avoiding the roger wagon. dan and big man. they both didn't like the roger wagon. perhaps because they knew he was town, and they wanted to try to look good by not lynching town?

well, dan jumped on. big man did not.

big man, noted.

Can go either way though. They could have known he was town, but they also could have THOUGHT he was town. We will drive ourselves insane if we start thinking that not jumping on town wagons is scummy + it's sort of illogical and a bit of a stretch. Roger is still very possibly scum too, but at this point his claim in turn with his flavor is too strong for me to hammer. May reconsider after reading back after work. Titania's play has been strange.