In that piece, the Judge talked about going after the 16th amendment, but what about the 17th, which fundamentally altered the structure of the federal government and the ability of the states to check its power?

An argument can be made that it was actually never even properly ratified: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=28776If it is indeed true that the 17th amendment was fraudulently declared ratified, and a legislature were to force the issue into a court of law by appointing two U.S. Senators and sending them to Washington D.C. to be seated, what impact would it have on the freedom movement?

In that piece, the Judge talked about going after the 16th amendment, but what about the 17th, which fundamentally altered the structure of the federal government and the ability of the states to check its power?

An argument can be made that it was actually never even properly ratified: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=28776If it is indeed true that the 17th amendment was fraudulently declared ratified, and a legislature were to force the issue into a court of law by appointing two U.S. Senators and sending them to…

Judge, the money issue is more central to the quest for freedom than any other issue. If people understood the nature of modern monetary mechanics, they would immediately pull all "money" out of their bank accounts, and the system would collapse. Dollars are not money. Dollars are no different than chips at a child's poker game, where there is no money on the line.

We need honest money, and I think shows like yours should begin to press for this. Bring on guests who can promote alternatives to our current system. A simple example would be to promote the idea of having independent funds, like commodity or gold ETFs, issue debit cards to their investors that can be used by member retailers and institutions. Commodity based money would free us from the choke hold of the central banks, and it would put the power of government back in the hands of savers, not speculators.

You have smart guests like Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, and others on who understand the money issue. However, we need to start having shows where alternative money systems are lightly conceived and batted around in public. People need to start realizing that an alternative system is possible. This is the next step.

Keep up the good work.

PS: you should have Richard Duncan, author of Dollar Crisis, on your show. The man knows his stuff. We need more and more of these people coming out of the woodwork so that Americans can start to see things for what they are and not for what politicians say they are.

Hullaballoo

Judge, the money issue is more central to the quest for freedom than any other issue. If people understood the nature of modern monetary mechanics, they would immediately pull all "money" out of their bank accounts, and the system would collapse. Dollars are not money. Dollars are no different than chips at a child's poker game, where there is no money on the line.

We need honest money, and I think shows like yours should begin to press for this. Bring on guests who can promote alternatives to our current system. A simple example would be to promote the idea…

What is the deal w/ Dennis Kucinich recently introducing HR 2424 this week; his OWN bill to audit the Fed? Why is he not supporting/cosponsoring HR 1207 and what implications does this bill have for the growth of the bipartisan movement around Ron Paul's HR 1207?

The House has been artificially fixed to 435 representatives in 1928. Where each averaged around 30,000 citizens before, they are now averaging 700,000 and growing! What impact do you feel this has had on our system of government? Details on this site (not mine): http://www.thirty-thousand.org

For people who ask "What can I do?" I strongly recommend finding like-minded people, in your local area if possible.
For example, Campaign for Liberty has local groups all across the country. Also check out Restore the Republic, We The People, and more. Once you link up with a local group, you can get involved and potentially have more of an impact than you can as an individual. You can reach out to your neighbors and your community and talk about the issues of freedom.

If I misrepresent something I sell, the buyer may ask a police officer to arrest me for fraud.

Why is it that I can go to jail for selling something that isn't what I claim it is, but financial folks can make millions misrepresenting what they are selling and then get money from the government? Why isn't financial fraud involving Billions prosecuted when financial fraud involving thousands is?