Possible TR-3B Black triangle video

I apologize if this video has been posted already but I could no find it doing a search.
This is possibly the best video evidence I have seen. There is a lame documentary in the midle but the video I amtalking about starts at about 4:50
and goes to about 6:22 ther is another one at the end but it seems staged sounds like cheech and chong watching it. ok trying to imbed it, just
pasting the link for right now.

It's controlled by an AI system that is housed deep underground in a facility much like Dulce NM, the craft has many bugs and that may account for
the sightings over populated areas and must travel in bursts before it needs to stop and recharge, it's interstellar capable.

Sorry if have no sources to site on this but this is what I found out from some people I have talked to and that is subject to scrutiny...

Well you can't deny there are certainly delta-winged or flying-winged aircraft within the inventory of the USAF that resemble a majority of the craft
purported in "black triangle" sightings.

While we don't have a good idea of their propulsion systems or purpose we certainly know the the military is researching and producing these
concepts.

The XB-70 Valkyrie, the Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle as part of the FALCON project, the X-30, the X-20 DynaSoar are some of the names that come to
mind.
They definitely have an interest in these things and are pursuing them secretively.

I'd say this would have to account for at least a good majority of "flying triangle" sightings reported in the US, and perhaps in other parts of
the world too. The increase in sightings is probably due to increased testing and more evaluation.

This whole "Black Triangle" conspiracy started around the 1990's coinciding with when the USAF was beginning to explore a lot of new concept
aircraft, including Delta-winged aircraft, and when many of the purported craft like the TR-3B, the Aurora and so on were sighted. Put 2 and 2
together...

I'm denying that that they could be UFO's, but I think for the time being the majority of the sightings are cases of mistaken identity.

Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Well you can't deny there are certainly delta-winged or flying-winged aircraft within the inventory of the USAF that resemble a majority of the craft
purported in "black triangle" sightings.

No, I am not denying the similiarities to say the F117 and B2 even though the B2 is more a flying wing.

This whole "Black Triangle" conspiracy started around the 1990's coinciding with when the USAF was beginning to explore a lot of new
concept aircraft, including Delta-winged aircraft, and when many of the purported craft like the TR-3B, the Aurora and so on were sighted. Put 2 and 2
together...

And yet absolutely nothing tangible is known about the TR3-B or Aurora.

I'm denying that that they could be UFO's, but I think for the time being the majority of the sightings are cases of mistaken
identity.

And as always it is an individuals right to have an opinion, what I am saying is it is hard to be wrong or right on the subject because of conflicting
patterns.

Below is a map taken from the NIDS report, which is probably the best known attempt to try and document the data from 1990-2003.

And regarding comparisons to previous secret aircraft such as the F117 and B2.

The trend of open deployment as described in this report is not consistent with secret operation of an advanced DoD aircraft. For example, crude
examination of the (anecdotally derived) patterns of deployment of previously developed DoD stealth aircraft programs, including the F-117 and the B-2
aircraft, show that the pattern of deployment of unacknowledged F-117 and B-2 aircraft, prior to their acknowledgement by DoD, is different from the
patterns for the Flying Triangles.
Prior to acknowledgement of the F-117 and B-2 aircraft, only rare night time sightings occurred in the sparsely populated sections of Nevada,
California and a few other states (see F-117 and B-2 in 12).
Flying at low altitude over populated areas was rarely reported for the F-117 or B-2.
In contrast, the Flying Triangle deployment, especially during the 1990s, appears more consistent with the open and public operation of these
aircraft.
In some cases (for example see the above description of the Port Washington Triangle), the deployment may be more consistent with an attempt to
display or to be noticed.
There appears to be little or no attempt to hide.
Hence, the cumulative recent data from several databases lead us to modify the tentative NIDS hypothesis, published in July 2003, that the Triangles
are covertly deployed DoD aircraft.

1. Well first off, how the heck do we know how and where the government tests Black aircraft? Nobody's got access to Groom Lake's flight paths, or
Nellis or Edwards AFB's... I mean who knows if they would test them in public areas. They could be flying overhead for all we know..

Perhaps it could be a coordinated disinformation campaign. Testing exotic craft in open areas to deliberately promote this kind of confusion and
dithering were going through on the boards right now. Perhaps they don't, but nonetheless it's a dubious claim at best.

2. Notice the concentrations around LA, the North-East, New York, Washington, etc...

Just a guess but that coincides with some major air bases and installations located around those places. Namely Nellis, Edwards, A51, Niagara Falls,
and Fairchaild.

Especially LA, I mean Nellis & Area 51 are a stone throw away and look the dispersion, dots all around that area, that seems very consistent with
flights originating from those bases.

I don't see anything particularly puzzling about the map, but the the scale of the sightings I wasn't aware about. There isn't a US state that
hasn't seen a friggin' black triangle

Well first off, how the heck do we know how and where the government tests Black aircraft?

We don't we can only go on previous testing of black aircraft like the F117 and B2 and they don't fall into that pattern.

Perhaps it could be a coordinated disinformation campaign. Testing exotic craft in open areas to deliberately promote this kind of confusion
and dithering were going through on the boards right now. Perhaps they don't, but nonetheless it's a dubious claim at best.

Maybe, but previous flight patterns of black aircraft are the only hard data we have.

Just a guess but that coincides with some major air bases and installations located around those places. Namely Nellis, Edwards, A51, Niagara
Falls, and Fairchaild

And that was the original findings of the report:

In earlier reports, NIDS outlined a tentative correlation between reported sightings of Triangles and the locations of Air Mobility Command and
Air Force Materiel Command bases in the United States.
These reports and hypotheses derived from them can be found in the “Research News” section (www.nidsci.org...) of the NIDS
web site.

But was later modified for the reasons given in my last post.

Just as a comparison below is a map of the sightings that took place during the Belgium flap notice how they correlate with roads or highways.

A secret spy plane might do a test run over an inhabited area to see how well its cameras work at high speeds.
The B-2 flew close to bases and installations from what I heard to trial it's radar absorption, the bases would try and pick up the craft and see if
it could make it past undetected.

But an interceptor or spy plane might need a completely different evaluation...
Just throwing that one on the table..

Just as a comparison below is a map of the sightings that took place during the Belgium flap notice how they correlate with roads or
highways.

Yeah now that's puzzling. Why Belgium? It's like the UFO wave in Mexico, all those sightings in crowded urban areas, sometimes even in broad
daylight in front of an entire city.

I think it's unlikely they are Belgian or European prototypes flying over there, because frankly Europe doesn't have much to test, but we know of
many jointly operated airbases in the UK which the US does flights from as well. It's not inconceivable that they could be flying over continental
Europe?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.