Why is that the Muslims can expel, kill, behead, subjugate all non-Muslim people who live in their 57 countries, but the Jews cannot live in their tiny homeland? This is a serious question. This is the question.

Why is the most aggressive, relentless, backward, violent people in history given every benefit of the blood and sweat of free peoples? They are indulged in their worst abuses. Why aren't the Jews given their basic human rights?

Why is it always about the Jews? Obama's speech was anti-semitic. Obama has to prove his bonafides to the ummah by delivering the Jews? Obama (along with the ummah) treats the Jews as an apartheid people.

There is no such thing as a "settler". There are only Jews who live in the homeland. Obama has no right, no right, to throw the Jews out. If Muslims won't live among the Jews, they'll have to leave. That works for me :)

Settlements are merely this year's model. Oslo, self-determination, Gaza blah blah blah ....... the Muslims never have to meet any condition. 16 years, NOT ONE CONDITION. Push the Jews further into a ghetto and all you've done is given the Muslims yet another victory over the Jews. In this Islamic colonialism, the line in the sand is moved yet again, to the Jews' terrible detriment. No more. Hamas (Iran) is in charge to the West, Hezb'Allah (Iran) to the north is sure to win the Lebanon elections - this is the poisonous fruit of appeasement. No more Jewish land to barbarians.

Obama the Humble declares there will be no more "dictating" to other countries.
We should "forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions," he told
the G-20 summit. In Middle East negotiations, he told al-Arabiya, America will
henceforth "start by listening, because all too often the United States starts
by dictating."

An admirable sentiment. It applies to everyone — Iran, Russia, Cuba, Syria, even
Venezuela. Except Israel. Israel is ordered to freeze all settlement activity.
As Secretary of State Clinton imperiously explained the diktat: "a stop to
settlements — not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth
exceptions."

What's the issue? No "natural growth" means strangling to death the thriving
towns close to the 1949 armistice line, many of them suburbs of Jerusalem, that
every negotiation over the past decade has envisioned Israel retaining.

It means no increase in population. Which means no babies. Or if you have
babies, no housing for them — not even within the existing town boundaries.
Which means for every child born, someone has to move out. No community can
survive like that.

The obvious objective is to undermine and destroy these towns — even before
negotiations.

To what end? Over the last decade, the U.S. government has understood that
any final peace treaty would involve Israel retaining some of the close-in
settlements — and compensating the Palestinians accordingly with land from
within Israel itself.

That was envisioned in the Clinton plan in the Camp David negotiations in
2000, and again at Taba in 2001. After all, why turn towns to rubble when,
instead, Arabs and Jews can stay in their homes if the 1949 armistice line is
shifted slightly into the Palestinian side to capture the major close-in Jewish
settlements, and then shifted into Israeli territory to capture Israeli land to
give to the Palestinians?

This idea is not only logical, not only accepted by both Democratic and
Republican administrations for the last decade, but was agreed to in writing in
the letters of understanding exchanged between Israel and the United States in
2004 — and subsequently overwhelmingly endorsed by a concurrent resolution of
Congress.

Yet the Obama State Department has repeatedly refused to endorse these
agreements or even say it will honor them. This from a president who piously
insists that all parties to the conflict honor previous obligations.

The entire "natural growth" issue is a concoction. It's farcical to suggest
that the peace process is moribund because a teacher in the Jewish Quarter of
Jerusalem is making an addition to her house to accommodate new grandchildren —
when Gaza is run by Hamas terrorists dedicated to permanent war with Israel and
when Mahmoud Abbas, having turned down every one of Ehud Olmert's peace offers,
brazenly declares that he is in a waiting mode — waiting for Hamas to become
moderate and for Israel to cave — before he'll do anything to advance peace.

In his much-heralded "Muslim world" address in Cairo on Thursday, Obama
declared that the Palestinian people's "situation" is "intolerable."

Indeed it is, the result of 60 years of Palestinian leadership that gave its
people corruption, tyranny, religious intolerance and forced militarization;
leadership that for three generations — Haj Amin al-Husseini in 1947, Yasser
Arafat in 2000, Abbas in December 2008 — rejected every offer of independence
and dignity, choosing destitution and despair rather than accept any settlement
not accompanied by the extinction of Israel.

In the 16 years since the Oslo accords turned the West Bank and Gaza over to
the Palestinians, their leaders — Fatah and Hamas alike — built no schools, no
roads, no courthouses, no hospitals, no institutions that would relieve their
people's suffering. Instead they poured everything into an infrastructure of war
and terror, all the while depositing billions (from gullible Western donors)
into their Swiss bank accounts.

Obama says he came to Cairo to tell the truth. But he uttered not a word of
that. Instead, among all the bromides and lofty sentiments, he issued but one
concrete declaration of new American policy: "The United States does not accept
the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements," thus reinforcing the myth that
Palestinian misery and statelessness are the fault of Israel and the
settlements.

(Photo: Palestinian militants from the Popular Resistance Committee
wear masks to conceal their identities from the camera as they pose with their
weapons while watching the televised speech of US President Barack Obama in
front of journalists at a training base in Gaza City, Thursday, June 4, 2009.
Quoting from the Quran for emphasis, President Barack Obama called for a "new
beginning between the United States and Muslims" Thursday and said together,
they could confront violent extremism across the globe and advance the timeless
search for peace in the Middle East.) hat tip Hal

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c60bf53ef01156fcb551b970c

Comments

Obama's Policy of Jewish Ethnic Cleansing

Why is that the Muslims can expel, kill, behead, subjugate all non-Muslim people who live in their 57 countries, but the Jews cannot live in their tiny homeland? This is a serious question. This is the question.

Why is the most aggressive, relentless, backward, violent people in history given every benefit of the blood and sweat of free peoples? They are indulged in their worst abuses. Why aren't the Jews given their basic human rights?

Why is it always about the Jews? Obama's speech was anti-semitic. Obama has to prove his bonafides to the ummah by delivering the Jews? Obama (along with the ummah) treats the Jews as an apartheid people.

There is no such thing as a "settler". There are only Jews who live in the homeland. Obama has no right, no right, to throw the Jews out. If Muslims won't live among the Jews, they'll have to leave. That works for me :)

Settlements are merely this year's model. Oslo, self-determination, Gaza blah blah blah ....... the Muslims never have to meet any condition. 16 years, NOT ONE CONDITION. Push the Jews further into a ghetto and all you've done is given the Muslims yet another victory over the Jews. In this Islamic colonialism, the line in the sand is moved yet again, to the Jews' terrible detriment. No more. Hamas (Iran) is in charge to the West, Hezb'Allah (Iran) to the north is sure to win the Lebanon elections - this is the poisonous fruit of appeasement. No more Jewish land to barbarians.

Obama the Humble declares there will be no more "dictating" to other countries.
We should "forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions," he told
the G-20 summit. In Middle East negotiations, he told al-Arabiya, America will
henceforth "start by listening, because all too often the United States starts
by dictating."

An admirable sentiment. It applies to everyone — Iran, Russia, Cuba, Syria, even
Venezuela. Except Israel. Israel is ordered to freeze all settlement activity.
As Secretary of State Clinton imperiously explained the diktat: "a stop to
settlements — not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth
exceptions."

What's the issue? No "natural growth" means strangling to death the thriving
towns close to the 1949 armistice line, many of them suburbs of Jerusalem, that
every negotiation over the past decade has envisioned Israel retaining.

It means no increase in population. Which means no babies. Or if you have
babies, no housing for them — not even within the existing town boundaries.
Which means for every child born, someone has to move out. No community can
survive like that.

The obvious objective is to undermine and destroy these towns — even before
negotiations.

To what end? Over the last decade, the U.S. government has understood that
any final peace treaty would involve Israel retaining some of the close-in
settlements — and compensating the Palestinians accordingly with land from
within Israel itself.

That was envisioned in the Clinton plan in the Camp David negotiations in
2000, and again at Taba in 2001. After all, why turn towns to rubble when,
instead, Arabs and Jews can stay in their homes if the 1949 armistice line is
shifted slightly into the Palestinian side to capture the major close-in Jewish
settlements, and then shifted into Israeli territory to capture Israeli land to
give to the Palestinians?

This idea is not only logical, not only accepted by both Democratic and
Republican administrations for the last decade, but was agreed to in writing in
the letters of understanding exchanged between Israel and the United States in
2004 — and subsequently overwhelmingly endorsed by a concurrent resolution of
Congress.

Yet the Obama State Department has repeatedly refused to endorse these
agreements or even say it will honor them. This from a president who piously
insists that all parties to the conflict honor previous obligations.

The entire "natural growth" issue is a concoction. It's farcical to suggest
that the peace process is moribund because a teacher in the Jewish Quarter of
Jerusalem is making an addition to her house to accommodate new grandchildren —
when Gaza is run by Hamas terrorists dedicated to permanent war with Israel and
when Mahmoud Abbas, having turned down every one of Ehud Olmert's peace offers,
brazenly declares that he is in a waiting mode — waiting for Hamas to become
moderate and for Israel to cave — before he'll do anything to advance peace.

In his much-heralded "Muslim world" address in Cairo on Thursday, Obama
declared that the Palestinian people's "situation" is "intolerable."

Indeed it is, the result of 60 years of Palestinian leadership that gave its
people corruption, tyranny, religious intolerance and forced militarization;
leadership that for three generations — Haj Amin al-Husseini in 1947, Yasser
Arafat in 2000, Abbas in December 2008 — rejected every offer of independence
and dignity, choosing destitution and despair rather than accept any settlement
not accompanied by the extinction of Israel.

In the 16 years since the Oslo accords turned the West Bank and Gaza over to
the Palestinians, their leaders — Fatah and Hamas alike — built no schools, no
roads, no courthouses, no hospitals, no institutions that would relieve their
people's suffering. Instead they poured everything into an infrastructure of war
and terror, all the while depositing billions (from gullible Western donors)
into their Swiss bank accounts.

Obama says he came to Cairo to tell the truth. But he uttered not a word of
that. Instead, among all the bromides and lofty sentiments, he issued but one
concrete declaration of new American policy: "The United States does not accept
the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements," thus reinforcing the myth that
Palestinian misery and statelessness are the fault of Israel and the
settlements.

(Photo: Palestinian militants from the Popular Resistance Committee
wear masks to conceal their identities from the camera as they pose with their
weapons while watching the televised speech of US President Barack Obama in
front of journalists at a training base in Gaza City, Thursday, June 4, 2009.
Quoting from the Quran for emphasis, President Barack Obama called for a "new
beginning between the United States and Muslims" Thursday and said together,
they could confront violent extremism across the globe and advance the timeless
search for peace in the Middle East.) hat tip Hal