“You Were Given The Choice Between War And Dishonor. You Chose Dishonor And You Will Have War.” Winston Churchill

Menu

Signs of our times.

Seems like many people outside of the mainstream liberal news media are already aware that the Democratic Party basically stole the last elections. The amazing thing is that the local and state governments have tacitly accepted the election results without so much as a raised eyebrow. When a county voter turnout results in more ballots cast than there are registered voters living in that county you would think someone in charge or anyone in the news media would say something. When the Republican Party tries in vain to pass common sense laws requiring voters to provide identification, the Democrats jump in and raise claims the GOP was trying to suppress the minority voters. Of course, without the burden of showing identification anyone can walk in to a polling place and give the name of someone who died and vote in their place. When the Republicans tried to make it easier for our military personnel overseas to obtain absentee ballots, the Democrats rallied in courts to stop it. Consequently, the votes cast by our fighting men and women have declined drastically in the last four years.

Rachel Alexander, the editor of the Intellectual Conservative, wrote a great piece about the extent of voter fraud on Townhall that demands some kind of response. Two paragraphs from her article describe most of the problem.

So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns? The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states. According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio’s Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio’s 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally removed.

The inflated numbers can’t just reflect voters who have moved, because the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote, one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by.

So why has the Republican National Committee been so silent on this obvious fraud? Why have they not sent lawyers into the courts to challenge the obvious transgressions of the Democratic Party? This is why. Read the case story on Judicial Review.

In 1982, the Republican National Committee (?RNC?) and the Democratic National Committee (?DNC?) entered into a consent decree (the ?Decree? or ?Consent Decree?), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC?s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court?s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC?s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court?s judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

A. 1981 Lawsuit and Consent Decree

During the 1981 New Jersey gubernatorial election, the DNC, the New Jersey Democratic State Committee (?DSC?), Virginia L. Peggins, and Lynette Monroe brought an action against the RNC, the New Jersey Republican State Committee (?RSC?), John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado, alleging that the RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in an effort to intimidate them in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (?VRA?), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The RNC allegedly created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters and, then, including individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls. The RNC also allegedly enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting with ?National Ballot Security Task Force? armbands. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.

To settle the lawsuit, the RNC and RSC entered into the Consent Decree at issue here. The RNC and RSC agreed that they would:

[I]n the future, in all states and territories of the United States:

(a) comply with all applicable state and federal laws protecting the rights of duly qualified citizens to vote for the candidate(s) of their choice;

(b) in the event that they produce or place any signs which are part of ballot security activities, cause said signs to disclose that they are authorized or sponsored by the party committees and any other committees participating with the party committees;

(c) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their agents or employees to remove or deface any lawfully printed and placed campaign materials or signs;

(d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or to interrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;

(e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;

(f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.

Cheer up, things will only get a little worse before they start getting better. The consent decree expires in 2017, right after the next presidential election. Before that happens, the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution may be repealed. The Twenty-second Amendment of the United States Constitution sets a term limit for election to the office of President of the United States. Congress passed the amendment on March 21, 1947. It was ratified by the requisite number of states on February 27, 1951. The Democrats have already introduced new bills for its repeal.

And guess who will likely be on the ballot in November of 2016? Yes, our wannabe president-for-life, Barack Hussein Obama, one-time Muslim, communist mentored, friend of domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, champion of the Muslim Brotherhood and suspected messiah of the uneducated minority voters. Self anointed King of America.

The Republican National Committee has not been completely silent on this issue. They tried in 2008 to appeal this agreement but the courts overruled them and the U. S. Supreme Court just recently refused to hear the case.

The court decided not to take up the RNC’s appeal without commenting on the case. The consent decree came about after the Democratic National Committee sued the RNC for enlisting off-duty sheriffs and police officers to patrol polling places in minority precincts in New Jersey during a 1981 gubernatorial election. In 1982, the RNC agreed not to carry out some programs designed to combat voter fraud and to have other reviewed by a federal court.

So while Americans are in a hot lather over our wannabe president-for-life making his first attempt to ban the ownership of guns, as all good dictators have done before him, we are all now up to our armpits fighting the alligators in the dismal Democratic swamp called Socialism. So a few more words comparing guns to socialized medicine are in order. These are, after all, the signs of our times.

In 2011, according to the FBI national crime statistics,
323 people were killed by semi-automatic assault rifles.
496 people were killed with hammers.
650 people were killed with knives.
12,000 people were killed by drunk drivers.
195,000 people died as the result of medical malpractice.
You are 600 times more likely to die by using your Obamacare than by a semi-automatic rifle.

Why is it that none of the mentally disturbed and evil men, who steal guns, then go and kill movie-goers and children in school, has ever been identified as a conservative Republican NRA member?
Ft Hood~~~ Registered Democrat ~ Muslim
Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals
Virginia Tech ~~~ Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff ~ Registered Democrat
Colorado Theater ~~~ Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal
Connecticut School Shooter- ~~~ Registered Democrat; hated Christians,
Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats.”
INTERESTING, isn’t it?

As Rod Serling, creator of the television series The Twilight Zone might say,

You are on the road to Oblivion, there is a sign post up ahead, it says turn Left to vote Democrat.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides. I never vote for Democrats.