Based on what I can see in many pictures of the A29 SQ5 TDI and the A26 RSQ3 they share a very similar, if not identical tire tread (as you can see). It would only make sense for them to both have the same tire type in game. Either nerf the SQ5 to performance (so many people would be angry) or buff the RSQ3 to All-Surface, make it A30 and one of the best off-roaders in the game. Based on its big brother, it seems as if it doesn’t deserve performance tires in game, more like all surface. I hope the image can articulate my point.

As noted in the first post, corrections can only be implemented with an update, and the next update is a big one and so will take a little while to come out, unfortunately. Attention in December did go more towards hill climb physics than corrections, so this thread hasn't got the attention it should. We do now have 160 corrections with some sort of link to back them up that are in the process of being checked, so the next bottleneck is getting through those and then getting an update out.

The above note remains true - the bottleneck at this point is getting some corrections done for PL8. I can process some more of these but they're extremely unlikely to make it into PL8 at this point, so I haven't prioritised it.

The 0-60 link: https://fastestlaps.com/models/porsche-918-spyder>Fastestlaps is strictly moderated and only edited once reviewed by a moderator, the test results are very reliable.The power/torque link (video from porsche): >It's from porsche themselves, you'd be better off believing them. Timestamp: 4m13s

S29 2015 McLaren 570s Coupe0-60 2.9>2.7GRIP 88>90

Note:the 570s beats the caterham seven 620r (2.8s 91handling) on hockenheim short, it should get a boost in handling.

S27 2010 Porsche Panamera Turbo0-60 4.0>3.4RQ 27>28Also:The panamera turbo did the AutoZeitung test track in 1:38:70 (https://fastestlaps.com/models/porsche-panamera-turbo)This is faster than the 2016 bmw m4 (3.9s 85 handling), so it should at least have more handling (or equal) than the m4.

Another car that needs a fix is this Jaguar XKR-S GT. Here are the times in game stockAutomobile Magazine ran this car on the 1 mile and got this timeThe trap speed at 1 mile is 10 mph faster than what is in game. I think this car definitely needs to be fixed. Here is the link to the video

Ok this next one is quite funny. The RQ 26 Mercedes-Benz AMG GLE 63 S needs a big midrange buff. Here are its stats in game (stock) Here is are the results of a test done by Car and Driver That 0-150 mph result in game is hilarious The real car does it 25 seconds quicker than the in game one. I think this car is srt charger levels of bad lol. Anyways, here is the link to the article https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15102008/2016-mercedes-amg-gle63-s-4matic-test-review/

Ok this next one is quite funny. The RQ 26 Mercedes-Benz AMG GLE 63 S needs a big midrange buff. Here are its stats in game (stock) Here is are the results of a test done by Car and Driver That 0-150 mph result in game is hilarious The real car does it 25 seconds quicker than the in game one. I think this car is srt charger levels of bad lol. Anyways, here is the link to the article https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15102008/2016-mercedes-amg-gle63-s-4matic-test-review/

The poor 0-150 result will be because topdrives considers the 155mph top speed as a true terminal velocity rather than an artificial limit. This and a lot of other German cars should be much better at the top-end

Ok this next one is quite funny. The RQ 26 Mercedes-Benz AMG GLE 63 S needs a big midrange buff. Here are its stats in game (stock) Here is are the results of a test done by Car and Driver That 0-150 mph result in game is hilarious The real car does it 25 seconds quicker than the in game one. I think this car is srt charger levels of bad lol. Anyways, here is the link to the article https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15102008/2016-mercedes-amg-gle63-s-4matic-test-review/

I was going to post this once I pull a gle my self. I really want that car so bad.... irl , it even beats a g63 . my mom used to drive one till last year.

I'm back, and since that the Evo X FQ-400 prize car has been indirectly confirmed to have a name/image change rather than full on stat change, so I'm back with option B.

The option A, was to change the stats of the Evo X FQ-400 to its actual stats of 155mph / 3.8s rather than the 175mph / 3.2s currently in game.

And I guess they don't want the previous and upcoming winners of the Evo X FQ-400 to feel ripped off knowing that their car is gonna get a nerf so huge that it's gonna be only slightly better than the FQ-360 Evos, which I would understand that decision. :P

So here's the proposed option B, which I assume is the method they're going for.

The same "3.5s 0-60 time" statement can also be found at the 3:00 mark in the Evo vs Lamborghini Part 1:

And I don't have exact concrete info about this one, but the Traction Control should be disabled as well, since Evos didn't really get TCS until X.

Disclaimer: None of these corrections sourced from Automobile Catalog are ESTIMATIONS. Period, so please, stop spreading false rumours of "automobile catalogue are using estimated datas therefore it shouldn't be trusted"

I'm back, and since that the Evo X FQ-400 prize car has been indirectly confirmed to have a name/image change rather than full on stat change, so I'm back with option B.

The option A, was to change the stats of the Evo X FQ-400 to its actual stats of 155mph / 3.8s rather than the 175mph / 3.2s currently in game.

And I guess they don't want the previous and upcoming winners of the Evo X FQ-400 to feel ripped off knowing that their car is gonna get a nerf so huge that it's gonna be only slightly better than the FQ-360 Evos, which I would understand that decision. :P

So here's the proposed option B, which I assume is the method they're going for.

The same "3.5s 0-60 time" statement can also be found at the 3:00 mark in the Evo vs Lamborghini Part 1:

And I don't have exact concrete info about this one, but the Traction Control should be disabled as well, since Evos didn't really get TCS until X.

Disclaimer: None of these corrections sourced from Automobile Catalog are ESTIMATIONS. Period, so please, stop spreading false rumours of "automobile catalogue are using estimated datas therefore it shouldn't be trusted"

Here are the results for the black series from motor trend and car and driver.

MT: "We recorded a 0-to-60-mph time of just 4.2 seconds and a quarter-mile of 12.6 seconds at 112.6 mph."Car and driver: "Stay on it for 23.1 seconds after launch, and you're at 150 mph and heading at a fairly determined rate for the 186-mph governed top speed"

Here are the results for the black series from motor trend and car and driver.

MT: "We recorded a 0-to-60-mph time of just 4.2 seconds and a quarter-mile of 12.6 seconds at 112.6 mph."Car and driver: "Stay on it for 23.1 seconds after launch, and you're at 150 mph and heading at a fairly determined rate for the 186-mph governed top speed"

The viper tested by Car and Driver is different than the viper in the game but I looked at the motortrend review of the 2013 SRT Viper and it runs a 11.5 sec 1/4 mile with a trap speed of 128.7. I can only assume that it has a 0-150 of around the same time. https://www.motortrend.com/news/2013-srt-viper-first-test/