In this undated picture, Ahmed Wali Karzai, right, leader of the provincial Kandahar legislative council and younger half-brother of the Afghan president, talks with a man in Kandahar. Karzai was assassinated on July 12, 2011. (STR/AFP/Getty Images)

As Afghanistan and Washington deal with the fallout from the assassination of Afghan President Hamid Karzai's powerful half-brother on Tuesday, it's worth reviewing the West's controversial backing of a man repeatedly accused of corruption and dealing drugs.

The killing of Ahmed Wali Karzai, better known in diplomatic circles as AWK, throws into sharp relief the pattern by the West and the Afghan government of relying on problematic powerbrokers and warlords since the fall of the Taliban in late 2001. Also, the assassination has left a major power vacuum in the south, the major stronghold of Taliban-led insurgents and the drug trade, even as the United States plans its withdrawal and endgame for Afghanistan.

Until his brother's rise to power, Ahmed Wali Karzai was best known for the leek dumplings at his Chicago restaurant. Since then, although his official position was simply the head of the Kandahar provincial council, he was much more than that. He was the de facto leader in four of the country's southern provinces. He was accused of dealing drugs, of taking kickbacks in land deals, of interfering in political assignments. Cross Ahmed Wali Karzai, the refrain went, and kiss your government job goodbye. Throughout the south, he was the person to know, the person who determined things as small as where a car dealership could set up shop in Kandahar. Many credited him with securing his brother's re-election in the south in 2009.

Western officials were always ambivalent about AWK and other Afghan officials accused of trafficking drugs. Yet nothing seemed to change the fact that for the West, Ahmed Wali Karzai became the go-to man in southern Afghanistan—in large part, because there was no one else. He was one-stop shopping for getting things done, the devil they knew.

The Karzais dismissed allegations of drugs and corruption as politically motivated. In an interview in his Kandahar compound in June 2006, Ahmed Wali Karzai told me that the claims were an attempt to discredit his brother. "I am sick and tired of the drug accusation," he said. "It's the same old story. It's to get to the president."

Diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks show the increasing suspicions of some U.S. officials. "The meeting with AWK highlights one of our major challenges in Afghanistan: how to fight corruption and connect the people to their government, when the key government officials are themselves corrupt," said a U.S. Embassy report from a meeting in October 2009.

Despite the controversy, dozens of men continued to show up at Ahmed Wali Karzai's compound every day, all eager to pay their respects and ask for favors, the way business has always been done in Afghanistan. On Tuesday, one of those men, a longtime friend from the same tribe and the same village, shot and killed him.

Regardless of who was behind the killing, the insurgents are expected to try to take advantage of the lack of strong leadership in the region. So far, no one is publicly lining up to be the new powerbroker in the south, and no names are being circulated. Who would want the job? More than half the people assassinated in the country since March lived in Kandahar, the U.N. says. Most of Ahmed Wali Karzai's rivals are either in government jobs elsewhere—or, in many cases, dead.

3 comments

I informed my loved ones and friends about some electronic offers which are ambivalent in nature and hard to believe or disbelieve.
My own sister is too scared to help me explore further by challenging the faceless contacts in “diguise of scum running scams” and a female friend: Eve tells me, what if a big truck crashes me on a Canadian street, instead of using freely available guns!
Their thoughts reflect that we are, in the west, so much in fear of our security too and my positive feelings about our personal safety and well-being in here are still fragile on which good part of our government need to focus more and secure solidly the survival of good guys!

Safeguard the public interest

Republish This Story for Free

Thank you for your interest in republishing the story. You are are free republish it so long as you do the following:

You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, "yesterday" can be changed to "last week," and "Portland, Ore." to "Portland" or "here.")

If you’re republishing online, you have to link to us and to include all of the links from our story, as well as our PixelPing tag.

You can’t sell our material separately.

It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories.

You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.