Laughing with your Mouth Open Sounds Best

Voiced laughter elicits more positive emotion in listeners when producedwith the mouth open than closed. Laughter is ubiquitous in human interaction, but little is known aboutthe communicative mechanisms involved. In previous work, listeners hearinglaughter in isolation experienced positive emotion in response to voiced laughs,but showed neutral or negative reactions to unvoiced versions-even thoughall sounds had originally been recorded in positive circumstances. Currentwork compared ratings of open versus closedmouth voiced laughter, againfrom positive circumstances. Participants were 28 university students (14female) hearing a total of 48 different laughter bouts presented in two randomizedblocks (96 total trials). Listeners rated how positive each bout sounded usinga 4point scale ranging from “neutral” to “very positive.”Laughter included 24 openmouth and 24 closedmouth bouts, with 12 of eachtype from males and females. Mean ratings did not differ by listenersex orstimulusblock. However, female laughter was rated significantly higher thanmale

laughter, replicating previous results. Furthermore, ratings for openmouthlaughter were significantly higher than for closedmouth sounds, both acrossand within laugher sex. Results suggest that a higher positive arousal invocalizers is associated with a greater likelihood of laughing with the mouthopen, and that listeners hearing this laughter experience more positive emotionthan for closedmouth versions. Laughing with your Mouth Open Sounds Best. Laughter is a central part of human social interaction, starting in early infancy and continuing throughout the life-course. Both producing and hearing laughter are most often associated with positive emotion, although not uniformly so. For instance, recent research has shown that vowel-like, “voiced” laughter is consistently rated as a positive sound by listeners tested in laboratory settings. Noisier, “unvoiced” laughter is another very common form, however, and has been found to have little emotional impact. This finding is particularly intriguing given that both types are routinely produced by laughers experiencing positive emotion. In other words, all laughter from positive, enjoyable circumstances does not sound uniformly positive to listeners, although it is not yet clear why not. The current work goes a step further in asking whether having the mouth open or closed while laughing also plays a role in the perception of these sounds, now examining voiced laughter in particular. Results confirmed that all voiced laughs are inherently positive to listeners, but also show that laughter produced with the mouth open has a significantly more positive

impact on listeners. Historically, there has been surprisingly little study of the human behavior of laughing, with most work instead focusing on topics such as humor as a common trigger of laughter. More recently, however, laughter itself has begun to receive much-needed attention, for instance addressing basic questions such as what laughter acoustics are like and those acoustics affect listener perception. Though much remains to be learned, one well-established finding is that laughter by itself can affect a listener’s emotional state, as demonstrated by the successful use of laugh tracks to increase enjoyment of television comedy programs. Even cursory listening to such tracks nonetheless reveals that they overwhelmingly emphasize one particular kind of laughter, namely the “open-mouth, voiced” version. Voicing simply means that the vocal folds are vibrating, whereas laughter can also occur in an unvoiced, “breathy” fashion in which air moves forcefully through the vocal tract but without engaging the vocal folds. This contrast is illustrated in Fig. 1, along with sound examples. The difference is intriguing because although both kinds of sounds are associated with laughter produced while in a positive state, laboratory studies have shown that only voiced laughter reliably induces positive emotion in listeners. Unvoiced laughter typically leaves listeners unmoved. The current work took these observations a step further, comparing responses to voiced laughter produced with the mouth open versus having the mouth closed (see Fig. 2 and associated sound examples).

Given that both kinds of sounds are voiced, one could anticipate the two to elicit similar responses. For example, that outcome would be expected if voicing is a marker of positive emotion occurring in the vocalizer. On the other hand, having the mouth open or closed could reflect higher or lower arousal levels in the laugher, a cue that listeners could also be unconsciously responding to. In the current experiments, listeners heard a series of laughter bouts presented in random order over headphones, with each bout including at least one, and usually multiple, individual voiced bursts. The task in each case was to rate how positive each stimulus was, using scales that ran either from “very negative” to “very positive” or from “neutral or negative” to “very positive.” These sounds had been produced by laughers watching video clips or interacting socially, and were all associated with positive emotion. In the first experiment, 28 male and female university students rated 48 different laughter bouts, half being open-mouth sounds and half being closed-mouth, with half of each kind coming from male laughers and half from females. All the laughter was rated positively, although as in previous studies, female sounds were rated more positively than male versions. In the context of earlier work, the current outcomes show that listener responses to laughter can range from neutral (unvoiced) to somewhat positive (closed-mouth voiced) to clearly positive (open-mouth voiced) sounds. Laughter with vowel-like, voiced bursts produced with the mouth open clearly stand out from other variants, with longer bouts of

such laughter eliciting higher ratings and likely stronger emotional reactions in listeners. Here it is important to again note that all the laughter tested in the experiments had originally been recorded from vocalizers who themselves were experiencing positive emotions. One likely interpretation is therefore that acoustic differences in positively toned laughter are correlated with changes in vocalizer arousal level. In other words, voiced, open-mouth laughter may in particular stand out because as laugher arousal goes up, the vocal folds are increasingly set in motion and the mouth opens during sound production. Listeners may or may not understand that connection at a conscious level, but may respond emotionally to these changes through unconscious processing. Work is now underway to test the connection between vocalizer state and acoustics more directly by recording laughter from vocalizers who are reporting enjoyment level during the laughter-inducing task itself, with experimenters simultaneously measuring key indicators of their reactions at a purely physiological level. Michael J. OwrenDepartment of Psychology Georgia State University Atlanta USA. – Tobias Riede National Center for Voice and Speech University of Utah USA. News from: Pan-American/Iberian Meeting on Acoustics, Cancun, Mexico asa.aip.org

Dear friend,this is an open project and accepts the help of anyone willing to make positive thinking…