tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post1955730753829719664..comments2017-08-29T02:01:52.741-07:00Comments on Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry: A Closer Look: New American Psychiatric Association Prez: We Want MoneyCL Psychhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13990549972520745769noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-89090721237749244392010-08-23T01:50:36.683-07:002010-08-23T01:50:36.683-07:00The APA has no credibility. It acts like a crimina...The APA has no credibility. It acts like a criminal organization, protecting misogynistic, narcissistic, sometimes mentally ill, Jewish white men, like Paul S. Appelbaum and all of his Harvard buddies. They cover up crimes like sexual assaults and manslaughter, destroy other people&#39;s careers and feel free to publish ridiculously long lists of articles and research studies that have absolutely no impact on our abusive, inadequate, dangerous health care system. Medicine in this country is a game and the APA boys are some of the best gamesters around. How else could Appelbaum, who is clearly suffering from, and severely affected by, Asperger&#39;s disorder, be tolerated and given so much power for so long.shawna murray mdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05195492657469094256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-30511625090765059642009-10-25T22:35:28.885-07:002009-10-25T22:35:28.885-07:00I don&#39;t like unpaid bad science, but the paid ...I don&#39;t like unpaid bad science, but the paid bad science makes me even more ticked offhassaidihttp://cinergyhealths.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-10963225753097235482009-09-26T23:21:42.887-07:002009-09-26T23:21:42.887-07:00I don&#39;t know about psychiatrists ourselves, bu...I don&#39;t know about psychiatrists ourselves, but APA stands make plenty of $$ with publication of DSM-V. And Schatzberg critizes Alan Francis for making &lt;$10k per year on DSM-IV?moviedochttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03617061594621924756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-51673984920334793172009-07-15T14:49:10.245-07:002009-07-15T14:49:10.245-07:00Deleted a spam comment, in case anyone cares.Deleted a spam comment, in case anyone cares.CL Psychhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13990549972520745769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-15221421429865619232009-07-14T20:41:55.490-07:002009-07-14T20:41:55.490-07:00im glad we&#39;re in agreement that abilify sucks!...im glad we&#39;re in agreement that abilify sucks! but...have u heard they&#39;re using seroquel on the streets??? http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2009/07/13/psychiatric_pill_thriving_on_streets_as_sedative/<br /><br />-lamethursday31190http://openid.aol.com/thursday31190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-58384542433136958382009-07-14T07:02:04.345-07:002009-07-14T07:02:04.345-07:00There are many ways to control chronic pain, and o...There are many ways to control chronic pain, and one of them is through anxiolytics, which are medicines that have obtained a better result than other drugs such as naproxen, aspirin, ibuprofen, medications that relieve pain but are not effective for these chronic cases, as these pains are more like a back pain that the world is one of the most common causes of absenteeism in findrxonline as indicated in your article on back pain and chronic pain, and opioid medications are as Vicodin, Lorcet, Meperidine to soothe the pain caused by this disease and we must be very careful.Health Painhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05952451516960690028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-8514180334620703582009-07-13T21:49:22.629-07:002009-07-13T21:49:22.629-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Matthew Tripphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05211881935174715199noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-47621845037828536472009-07-01T00:30:53.738-07:002009-07-01T00:30:53.738-07:00Certainly, doing bad science and taking pride in i...Certainly, doing bad science and taking pride in it is a bad thing. However, just how clear is the line between speculation and genuine bad science? The way things are in the psychiatric field, what&#39;s accepted as right one moment could be completely debunked by the next study published.fluoxetinehttp://www.prozac.bznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-20319583800571833002009-06-29T04:50:23.171-07:002009-06-29T04:50:23.171-07:00I chanced upon to view your blog and found it very...I chanced upon to view your blog and found it very interesting. Great ... Keep it up!Adamhttp://www.rnbresearch.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-90050593208491074332009-06-28T08:45:37.852-07:002009-06-28T08:45:37.852-07:00WD, thanks. Maybe I could have been more clear up...WD, thanks. Maybe I could have been more clear up front. Getting paid for one&#39;s work = good. Taking pride in doing bad science = bad.CL Psychhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13990549972520745769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-45778990813195541282009-06-27T11:35:12.676-07:002009-06-27T11:35:12.676-07:00Hey CL,
I read your post more carefully and I do ...Hey CL,<br /><br />I read your post more carefully and I do understand the point you were making more clearly. And it&#39;s a good one.<br /><br />CheersWDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12980827610582358520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-41943748379647186572009-06-24T09:48:36.284-07:002009-06-24T09:48:36.284-07:00WD,
Thank you for missing the entire point of the...WD,<br /><br />Thank you for missing the entire point of the post. I am not suggesting that anyone work for free. Rather, I&#39;m concerned with people doing bad science, then getting reimbursed generously by corporate sponsors for their poor scientific work. I don&#39;t like unpaid bad science, but the paid bad science makes me even more ticked off -- as it suggests an element of greed rather than simple human error. Or maybe it&#39;s just blind faith in one&#39;s corporate sponsors. I can&#39;t claim to know the motivation with any certainty, but regardless of motivation, I don&#39;t think that anyone should take pride in doing bad science. And Schatz has been guilty of doing some bad science which favors his corporate sponsors. Which is not cool in my book.CL Psychhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13990549972520745769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-8087924116136552262009-06-22T22:46:52.356-07:002009-06-22T22:46:52.356-07:00Gosh, people actually wanting to get paid for thei...Gosh, people actually wanting to get paid for their work. Imagine that.WDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12980827610582358520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-17267803128784033912009-06-22T06:30:02.916-07:002009-06-22T06:30:02.916-07:00Up front disclaimer: this is not going to be a nic...Up front disclaimer: this is not going to be a nice comment, so if you as a reader are looking for fair and reasonable dialogue, look elsewhere!<br /><br />Schatzberg is the final example of what is not just wrong with the APA, but with the entrenched seasoned members who are beyond out of touch with what is responsible and appropriate as physicians in 2009. As a psychiatrist, but NOT a member of this pathetic organization, I call for noting it is time for nonAPA members to step up and denounce this farce of an organization to be minimized and disregarded, if we as a collective want to save psychiatry. These old fucks who think they know better than those of us who have become psychiatrists in the past 10 to 15 years need to retire or die off! They are a ruthless, insensitive, patriarchial bunch who only serve the antipsychiatry crowd by their poor choices in their unidimensional approach with meds only options. And Schatzberg is their poster child now.<br /><br />Sometimes you have to call people for what they are, and being politically correct is just a waste of time. The &quot;old Guard&quot; are not guarding, just hoarding and rationalizing their greed and lack of compassion. Don&#39;t believe me, just watch the lame justifications this guy will spew for the next year of his presidency of the APA.<br /><br />Nice post here, ClinPsych, thanks.<br /><br />Skillsnotpills, formerly therapyfirstskillsnotpillsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-60636404804321742232009-06-21T19:21:38.837-07:002009-06-21T19:21:38.837-07:00I just finished watching, &quot;The Dark Knight.&q...I just finished watching, &quot;The Dark Knight.&quot; Good movie. But why did the Joker remind me of Schatzberg???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33960805.post-49392230015634361852009-06-20T06:02:21.182-07:002009-06-20T06:02:21.182-07:00Schatzberg has a tin ear for the ethical issues. T...Schatzberg has a tin ear for the ethical issues. The money isn’t the issue. The issue is what people like Schatzberg and Nemeroff do to get the money, and the examples they set for students and junior faculty.<br /><br />Your example of Schatzberg pimping Lilly’s drug in a duplicate publication is a classic exposé. Don’t forget, this pos was published <i>in Schatzberg’s own journal!</i>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com