Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Not Latin again?

Pentecost 2015

Occasionally,
I’m confronted by some upset parishioners who complain about the amount of
Latin and (to those who are able to discern and make the distinction,) Greek
used during our masses here in the parish. Sometimes, it’s an over
exaggeration, “everything’s in Latin.” Honestly, a sampling of Latin in the
ordinaries used on the First Sunday of every month, which make up less than 5%
of the Mass, could hardly be considered as “everything.”

How
can we understand this opposition? The main arguments would sound like this – “I
don't understand Latin, and have difficulty making the responses. I would get
more out of the Mass if it were spoken in English.” One could punch holes in
the argument by merely pointing out that the Kyrie Eleison obviously refers to the “Lord have mercy” and Sanctus Sanctus to “Holy Holy,” since it
occupies that same slot in the mass as the version in the vernacular. Interestingly,
most of the complaints do not come from the young but from the older sector of
the parish, a group that had a fair bit of exposure to the Tridentine Latin
Mass in the past, with a few even acknowledging that they had been serving as
altar servers at such masses and would thus be familiar with the Latin. So, is
it a lack of comprehension or something else?

The
value of the use of vernacular languages in the liturgy certainly cannot be
discounted. Our Holy Father at the anniversary of the first mass celebrated by
Venerable Pope Paul VI in the vernacular, said that “allowing priests to
celebrate Mass in the language of the local congregation rather than in Latin
allowed the faithful to understand and be encouraged by the word of God.” Mass
in the vernacular rather than Latin would remind people that the house of God
is meant to be a source of spiritual strength, where they can hear his word and
feel “not like foreigners but as brothers and sisters.”

And
yet, I believe our Holy Father did not mean a total obliteration of Latin in the
liturgy. In most Papal masses, the ordinaries are sung in Latin. The Latin was
meant to exist alongside the vernacular. Pope St John XXIII, the architect of
Vatican II, a Council that is often cited as the reason for such a move to the
vernacular, resisted all attempts to exile the Latin language to the dusty
archives of the museums. Since the Latin language is not a living language used
by any particular nation, it is language that belongs to ALL. In Sacrosanctum Concilium, No 36, it was
decreed that the “use of the Latin language is to be preserved in the Latin
rites.”

The
complaints about the Latin may be a symptom of a larger malaise – an
ethnocentric obsession with the particular (or a rebellion against the
universal). Language, instead of being a medium of communicating with God and
fostering communion with His people, has now become a bone of contention, a
golden calf worshipped in its own right. “My preferred language is English (or
Tamil, or Bahasa Malaysia, or Mandarin) and I will not back down on my right to
hear the entire mass in the language of my choice without it being adulterated
by the insertion of any other foreign sounding languages.” The matter goes
beyond the issue of comprehension. If that was the case, then we should all
have settled for Bahasa Malaysia, our national language. Mostly everyone hates the idea of a
multi-cultural, multi-lingual mass, because my preferred language only enjoys limited
air-time during the entire celebration. The truth is that I’m not willing to
see an erosion of the space that I’ve carved out in this parish.

Due
to the liturgical babelism we are witnessing in this day and age, the
Eucharist, which is the supreme Sacrament of Unity, has now become a
counter-sign of division within the Church. The insistence of the use of the
vernacular, perhaps a mirror of our larger polarised Malaysian society, has
resulted in dividing the parish artificially into various self-sufficient
sub-parishes. The parish community, the Church, united by that first Pentecost
experience which healed the division of Babel, is reduced once again into a
highly segregated loose confederation of ghettoes. Today’s feast therefore challenges
us to revisit the use of language in our worship and liturgy, and in the larger
context to its role in uniting a diverse set of individuals and communities.

In
the Book of Genesis, we see man’s pride in wanting to rival God’s creation and
building a monument to the Cult of Man which was punished by the division of
language and division amongst ourselves. Just like the story of the Golden Calf
in the episode of the Exodus, the Tower of Babel is symbolic of the
narcissistic self-sufficient cult of building altars to worship one self and
one’s personal achievements. It resulted in the glorification of self. This
over-reaching to heaven brings fatal consequences when proud people imagine
they can, of themselves, construct the perfect life and surpass all previous
attempts. This is a grave warning to us all and especially to modern man’s
obsession with human culture without reference to its point of origin or
destination. The Tower of Babel failed because it was built upon fear and
pride. Without God there is no lynchpin to life and so collapse is inevitable.

According
to the Constitution of the Church in the Modern World, culture “in the general sense refers to all those things which
go to the refining and developing of man’s diverse mental and physical
endowments” (GS 53). And the culmination and perfection of these endowments
must find its end and purpose in the greatest Good, in God. But when culture
and language (a component of culture) no longer serves that greater Good, it is
then twisted and subverted to a worship of man and his achievements. When this
happens, language which is meant to facilitate communication (Latin
“communicare” – to create communion) no longer serves to bring about communion,
but rather becomes the cause for division.

Pentecost,
with its gift of understanding in different tongues was a sign that the breach
with God was repaired and that the breach among ourselves was also to be
healed. The miracle witnessed at the First Pentecost wasn’t a miracle of
glossolalia, the gift of tongues, but a miracle of communion that transcended
cultural barriers and linguistic affiliations.

The
point of this whole homily is not just merely making a case for the wider use
of Latin in the mass, the expulsion of the vernacular, or an argument that
seeks to turn back the clock. It is rather a call to greater self-examination
by all, whether advocates of Latin or its opponents, proponents of the
Traditional Latin Mass, and those who wish to suppress it, that this liturgical
war fought for the last few decades must cease. There is an inherent renewal
that must take place as part of the initiative of the Holy Spirit, rather than
that of man, but there must also be a recognition of the continuity of this
evolution because it is the same Spirit poured down on the First Pentecost, that
continues to work in the Church across the centuries; and the Spirit cannot
contradict Himself. The use of Latin alongside the vernacular serves to ensure this continuity.

The
Mass, was given to us to undo the curse of Babel and confessed a bond that held
Christians together that transcended language, race, class, and culture. It
cannot and should not be the cause for our division today. If indeed it has
become the reason for our division, we risk constructing another shaky Tower of
Babel that would rival the first. And in this light, the use of Latin, the
mother tongue of Church, cannot be regarded as the cause of division, outlawed
and shunned like a leper, but must certainly be used alongside the vernacular with
the hope that it can truly restore, augment and solidify the unity of the
Church which feeds on the One Bread, the One Body, the One Lord of All.

1 comment:

Terms of Use: As additional measure for security, please sign in before you leave your comments.

Please note that foul language will not be tolerated. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as "spamming" and "trolling" will be removed. Violators run the risk of being blocked permanently. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.

About Me

A priest of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Parish Priest of Church of Jesus Caritas, Kepong and Administrator of Chapel of Kristus Aman, Taman Tun Dr Ismail, KL.
Ecclesiastical Assistant and Chaplain for the Catholic Lawyers Society