(MarketWatch) -- A Federal Reserve official who was one of the strongest advocates
of raising rates last year now believes the central bank should refrain from
further boosts in borrowing costs for now.

In a speech in St. Louis on Wednesday, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
President James Bullard said declining interest expectations and declines
in financial markets argue against further boosts in the central bank's short-term
interest rate target, which now rests at a range of 0.25% to 0.50%.

"Two important pillars of the 2015 case for U.S. monetary policy normalization
have changed," Bullard said. "These data-dependent changes likely give the
[Federal Open Market Committee] more leeway in its normalization program," he
said in reference to central bankers' plans to raise rates further this year.

"Inflation expectations have fallen further," and with the losses seen in
markets, "the risk of asset price bubbles over the medium term appears to
have diminished," he said. That takes pressure off the Fed relative to last
year, when the price outlook and high asset prices pointed to a need for
higher rates, the official said.

Bullard spoke in the wake of the release of meeting minutes from the Fed's
January policy meeting. Having boosted rates in December the Fed refrained
from action last month. The minutes showed policy makers were struggling
to come to terms with why markets were performing so badly against a relatively
sound U.S. economic outlook.

So much good stuff here.

"Policy makers were struggling to come to terms with why markets were performing
so badly against a relatively sound U.S. economic outlook." Apparently
the highly-trained professionals at the Fed, when gauging the health of the
economy, overlooked collapsing commodity prices, a shrinking manufacturing
sector and soaring levels of student and auto debt, and saw only the fictitious
headline unemployment number.

The reason for this apparent blind spot goes right to the heart of the Keynesian/Austrian
debate: The former (who populate government and academia) don't include debt
in their models, and so tend to view any kind of consumption or jobs growth
as unambiguously good regardless of how much borrowing is necessary to achieve
it. So rising sub-prime auto loans, for instance, are a healthy sign because
they signal more people buying more stuff.

Austrians, in contrast, focus on society's balance sheet and view soaring
leverage -- especially for things of questionable value like cars and many
college degrees -- as a potential problem. Guess who is always right at big
turning points?

Other data points that have been screaming "don't raise rates" include:

Margin debt -- created when investors borrow against their stocks to buy more
stocks -- soared to a new record in 2014. For mainstream economists this was
fine because it meant people were optimistic and willing to both speculate
and -- due to the wealth effect of rising equity prices -- buy more houses,
TVs and SUVs. Austrians would simply note what happened the previous two times
investors leveraged themselves to the hilt and assume that a reversal is imminent.

The velocity of
money -- the rate at which dollars, once created, are spent -- has been
plunging as debt has been soaring. To mainstream economists, this is "puzzling." To
Austrian economists it's obvious that if you borrow too much money you'll
spend less in the future because you're either unwilling or unable to borrow
more.

Here again, this ignores the related leverage. Several trillion dollars have
been borrowed via bank loans and junk bonds to fund a vast expansion of US
oil and gas drilling capacity. Should a big part of that debt default -- which
now looks certain -- the impact will more than offset cheaper gas. See Commodities'
$3.6 trillion black hole.

We could do this all day. For almost every aspect of the modern global economy,
the people pulling the levers seem to be ignoring the single biggest indicator
of systemic health, which is the balance sheet. So the Fed, ECB, Bank of Japan,
Congressional Budget Office, and most university economics departments will
continue to be surprised by what happens and will, as a result, keep doing
the wrong thing.

Now, if raising interest rates was a dumb thing for the Fed to do, does that
mean cutting interest rates would be smart? No! The lesson to be drawn from
today's mess is that the way to avoid a debt-driven crisis is to avoid borrowing
too much in the first place. Once a society is sufficiently over-leveraged
there's really nothing it can do but let the inevitable bust happen and resolve
to do better next time.

John Rubino edits DollarCollapse.com and has authored or co-authored five
books, including The Money Bubble: What To Do Before It Pops, Clean
Money: Picking Winners in the Green Tech Boom, The Collapse of the Dollar
and How to Profit From It, and How to Profit from the Coming Real Estate
Bust. After earning a Finance MBA from New York University, he spent the
1980s on Wall Street, as a currency trader, equity analyst and junk bond analyst.
During the 1990s he was a featured columnist with TheStreet.com and a frequent
contributor to Individual Investor, Online Investor, and Consumers Digest,
among many other publications. He now writes for CFA Magazine.