/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say:
| Henry S. Thompson wrote:
|> For p:wrap, 'adjacent' matches of the 'match' option which have the
|> same string value for the 'group-by' expression, given the matched
|> node as context node, are wrapped together in a single 'wrapper'
|> element. Matches are 'adjacent' if they are siblings, and nothing
|> intervenes between them except all-white text nodes, comment nodes and
|> processing instruction nodes (but see below under 'ignore').
|
| This sounds like what <xsl:for-each-group group-adjacent="XPath">
| does. Could we call the option 'group-adjacent' rather than 'group-by'
| to be consistent with XSLT?
Works for me.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The offhand decision of some
http://nwalsh.com/ | commonplace mind high in office at a
| critical moment influences the course
| of events for a hundred years.--Thomas
| Hardy