"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Read more

I don't know about anywhere else in the country but around here married people around here can live quite well. 40 hours x 4 = 160 x $10 x 2 =$3200. Add in a little overtime and you could clear $3000 a month. Around here that is a lot. Even with a couple of children.

High (and I do mean HIGH) roller like you thinks 10 bucks an hour is good money?

<quoted text>Just how in the Whites of West Virginia math does four hours and day times four days a week equal 160 hours? God, flack, as my grandma woulda' said, "You ain't even got walkin' around sense." (Oh, and you forgot taxes, but I guess you guys on the dole usually do that.)

I never did think you were a teacher Melvin. Now I'm sure of it. You're just another brain dead libtard.

<quoted text>We also couldn't beat the Obama Team Cheerleaders willfully keeping half the country in the dark.Republicans are learning how to play this game though.Apparently, the majority of Americans ARE stupid and need constant reminding why they AREN'T happy with the direction this country is going.Romney made the mistake of thinking they could figure it out for themselves.That will change in 2016, no doubt.

Pay your light bill Fer krissaakes, over 60 million people are "stupid", and Carol is smart!!

<quoted text>Ahhhh, I didn't anticipate the ol' "Liar liar pants on fire" argument.Touché.They get it all right, spending has only increased more than $350 billion since they re-took the House.Mornin'.

Wonder who's fault that REALLY is...considering Republicans walk a tightrope - damned if they do, damned if they don't - when it comes to appeasing Senate democrats, a bullying president and the Obama Team Cheerleaders.

<quoted text>Whereas Waxturd and his cast of sockpuppets are downright ugly!!

Everyone is Waxman according to you, nutjob.

So tell me, what irresponsible schemes are you leftards up to this weeek?

Obamaturds told us Al Queda was on the run, but I hear we have dead people and hostages in Algeria and the lady Obama said we didn't want to have to worry about that 3AM call (Hillary), said they were the dreaded "terrorists". This is after our ambassador and three other Americans were killed in Benghazi.

Meanwhile you leftards are wasting time on your facade agenda of gun control while more people died of guns in Chicago than have died in Afghanastan. Don't worry though libtard. The Chicago Police Department has assigned at least 100 officers to secure the wedding of White House advisor Valerie Jarrett's daughter. The KGB Obama/Chicago machine of the left works still so the elitists will be safe.

Over on the economic front, ready for Obamacare and the economic recovery? Haha!

The CRA you leftards pushed was another good example of how foolish you are. The house across the street from me is still vacant after a year - a no money downer for sure - you liars blame greedy banks and the 1% but it is well known your failed CRA agenda had a large part.

<quoted text>To think Romney could have been so wrong in saying Americans aren't stupid.Romney's Mormonism helped Obama win. His misconstrued 47% remark sunk the ship.We'll get it right in 2016. Make no mistake. If we survive four more years.Wonder when the tipping point will crash the dollar? And nothing will be worth anything anymore?

It's very close. The smallest thing could send it crashing. The biggest concern for me is being downgraded again and interest rates spiking. That will quickly cause the house of cards to crumble.

They invoke the Constitution to say Obama is acting like a monarch, but the right-wing bloviators only succeed in revealing their ignorance of history and law.

.... when you scratch even a little beneath the surface of all the hyperbole, one thing becomes clear: The president’s actions don’t violate the Constitution; they only violate his critics’ political positions. In fact, based on the nature of the outcry, it’s Obama’s most strident foes who could use a lesson in the Constitution. Or, as Andy Borowitz jokingly (but not inaccurately) put it this week,“Republicans Accuse Obama of Using Position as President to Lead Country.

There are two issues here. The first relates to procedure, the second to substance.

On procedure, Obama has earned ire by proposing a series of 23 executive actions to improve public safety. Mike Huckabee said Obama has “nothing but contempt for the Constitution” and is willing to “trump” the “checks and balances of power in which no branch could act unilaterally.” GOP Rep. Steve Stockman threatened to pursue articles of impeachment against the president if he pursues gun regulation through executive order.

It is difficult to take these arguments seriously, but we’ve already learned that when Republicans can’t beat a Democratic president at the ballot box, they’re more than ready to impeach him. So let’s go through it one more time: Executive orders are commands the president gives to administrative agencies under his charge to take some type of action. They can be used to implement existing federal statutes the president is responsible for enforcing, and to carry out the president’s constitutionally granted powers, such as his role as commander-in-chief. The legal status of the president’s power to issue executive orders couldn’t be more clear. Presidents dating back to George Washington have issued executive orders. And the Supreme Court has clearly and consistently held that executive orders are constitutionally permissible.

Furthermore, none of Obama’s legislative proposals are likely to be held to violate the Second Amendment. While the Supreme Court held—for the first time, remarkably, in 2008—that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm, the Court’s decision made clear that the right was “not unlimited.” Indeed, the Court suggested that most forms of gun control, including bans on concealed-carry and restrictions on possession by felons and the mentally ill, are constitutional. The author of this gun-control-friendly decision? That rabid leftie socialist Antonin Scalia.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.