Essay on Is Wikipedia a Reliable Source

In this paper I will be discussing the debate between pro Wikipedia’s Dwight Reed, and Rachel R. Wright, and con Wikipedia’s Nicole Irwin, Michelle Douglas, and Ivy Leigh. During the debate between Learning Team B members we debated over different points of views regarding Wikipedia as a reliable source.

Debating Wikipedia

Almost everyone knows about Wikipedia. Heck, every time you use a search engine like Google, Wikipedia shows up as a source for information. Nicole Irving on the con side of the debate started out by saying “Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, so what makes the information shared by anyone true? If anyone can edit it then people can also edit it to be wrong. Dwight Reed…show more content…

Michelle Douglas also responded to Dwight Reed with Google might be a valid search engine, but what about the instances where you Google the fact that a popular star has just died and the person is alive and well. You can’t believe everything just based on the company supplying the information. Why does the medium of the internet make it a valid source???? Rachel R. Wright pro Wikipedia can back with Wikipedia is definitely not an information source that anyone should “bet the farm on” to be 100% valid but isn’t that or couldn’t that be the case with nay source? For the most part, the general information that you research on Wikipedia, when compared to other more reliable sources, is usually accurate. That being said, there is reason to believe that there is room for being considered credible. Completely valid is another thing, but again, that could be the case with any source as there is always room for error. Dwight Reeds last stitch effort to bring is point home. What make Wikipedia a valid source is the thousands of internet websites that link to the data in Wikipedia causing articles from Google and other search engines to consistently rank Wikipedia articles at the top of result list. Now, it is generally agreed that Wikipedia articles are reliable and useful information (Chesney, 2006). This is

Related Documents: Essay on Is Wikipedia a Reliable Source

non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Almost anyone who can access the site[5] can edit almost any of its articles. Wikipedia is the sixth most popular website[4] and constitutes the Internet's largest and most popular general reference work.[6][7][8] As of 2014, it has 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors each month.[9]
Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger launched Wikipedia on January 15, 2001. Sanger[10] coined its name,[11] a portmanteau of wiki (from the Hawaiian word for "quick")[12]…

Have you edited Wikipedia?
Wikipedia is important: it currently the sixth most popular site globally (Alexa, 2012b); it is disproportionately popular amongst school and undergraduate aged groups; and shows a high number of visits from school locations (Alexa, 2012b). The article was enlightening about the ‘backroom scenes’ of Wikipedia, a view also expressed widely in the forum. The article considers positive and negative aspects of the way that Wikipedia works. “Wikipedia is just an incredible…

named, Wikipedia. For over a decade institutions, professors and scholarly students abroad have criticized the ‘free to write’ site for its disinformation and overall legitimacy. The fundamental differences stem from Wiki’s inability to substantiate their site has the validity and credibility needed to be considered a good source of information. These negative feelings have been symbolically placed at the roots of Wikipedia’s foundation; their authors. The most profound flaw that Wikipedia seems…

everything that will help write about a specific research topic. Wikipedia is a great internet source to find useful information, but is it a legitimate research source? A legitimate research source online would be a site used to investigate and justify whatever it is you are researching. Using Wikipedia to find a source to use would be very useful but to actually cite Wikipedia would be a mistake. Most students should be able to tell if a source is credible or not just by reading it. Being able to tell…

Wikipedia (Listeni/ˌwɪkɨˈpiːdiə/ or Listeni/ˌwɪkiˈpiːdiə/ wik-i-pee-dee-ə) is a free-access, free content Internet encyclopedia, supported and hosted by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Anyone who can access the site[5] can edit almost any of its articles. Wikipedia is the sixth-most popular website[4] and constitutes the Internet's largest and most popular general reference work.[6][7][8] As of February 2014, it had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors each month.[9]…

University of Phoenix Material
Reliable Sources Worksheet
Locate three sources in the University Library on a topic of your choice. Provide the required information for each sources.
Source 1
Author: Richardson, Alan Larson, Edward
Date: Summer 2012
Title: Political science
Publication: Wilson quartely
Peer Reviewed?yes
What words did you use to find this article?political science
What type of article is this (research, summary, reflection, essay, etc.)?journL ARTICL
Did this…

Several sources online are factual based and have been approved by editors or fact-checkers, however the most commonly and popular research based data is not considered factual. Wikipedia, which used by numerous college students is not considered a factual research source. College students use Wikipedia for several reasons, such as studying for a midterm, final, or a term paper. It’s used constantly to recheck facts or a form of guidance. Even though numerous students rely on Wikipedia, it is not…

Wikipedia’s and other source may be similar, but students should take precautions when gathering information from Wikipedia and adding the website as their main source. In Cathy’s blog, she mentioned tips to know if the information in Wikipedia is credible enough to be the right source for doing academic writing. One tip that was mentioned in this website was to compare the information that’s found in Wikipedia to Encyclopedia Britannica, which is a well-known highly reputable source. If the information…

Wikipedia is a collaborative resource, which aims to be a compendium of all human knowledge. In a serious examination of Wikipedia as a credible and valid source of information we need to place our argument within a definable framework. As I will show information has many uses, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the use of Wikipedia for scholarly research, the kind, which I will be utilizing throughout the rest of my MBA program. I will be evaluating Wikipedia based on the parameters…

Words 930 - Pages 4

* Test names and other trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders. None of the trademark holders are affiliated with this website.