Recent literature (McQuillan 1986) has identified what may be a serious flaw in the planning process used by the USDA Forest Service. The problem, which McQuillan called the declining even flow effect (DEFE), can occur during repeated iterations of a planning process in cases where a timber harvest scheduling model whose objective is wealth maximization subject to nondeclining yield constraints is utilized. The DEFE creates a situation in a sequence of plans over time in which the first period harvest level declines below that attained for previous planning iterations. This paper addresses the relationship between the process used by the Forest Service to develop FORPLAN models and the DEFE. An example using Kootenai National Forest planning documents is presented to illustrate the highly constrained nature of Forest Service planning models. The effect of these constraints and other characteristics of FORPLAN models on the DEFE is examined. Two items common to nearly all forest planning models, a land base which is not entirely old-growth and constraints to assure that the 40-ac clearcut limit is not violated, caused a large reduction in the DEFE observed in a FORPLAN version of McQuillan's case study model. However, one characteristic of Forest Service planning models, the use of intermediate harvest options, which plausibly could have reduced the DEFE, did not. The major conclusion of the study is that the regulations, initial conditions, and formulation of the FORPLAN model all tend to reduce the likelihood and magnitude of the DEFE. For. Sci. 36(3):665-679.