New text-messages out from Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. One Key Email (dated on or about November 3) refers to a "forthcoming CF Article," and Nunes is trying to figure out what that means. Let's help.

Context: Looks like Page and Strzok were leaking info re Trump/Russia to news outlets. In a series of text messages occurring just before the Nov. 7, 2016 election, Page sends Strzok a text message: "Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus to the forthcoming CF article,” she texted. Congressional investigators are still trying to determine what the “CF article” reference means and who the agents thought they were trying to throw “under the bus.”

What is the "CF Article"? Is "CF" the initials of a reporter? Initials of a news organization? Something else?

Suggest we look for News Articles that are anti-Trump, Russia related, that were published on, say, November 5 to November 15, that was published by (a) a News organization, or (b) a specific reporter, that has the initials "CF."

>>156052996Sounds like it is a red herring. CF usually means Clinton Foundation but if it was simple it would already be out in the open. No reason to suggest this is not code or shorthand of some kind.

Yea, I thought about that. If that's the answer, it will be hard to find the article. But given that we have them talking about leaking to the press in several emails and this one with a specific date range, it shouldn't take too long to look at all of the anti-Trump, Russia-related emails around that time that were published by major publications.

Another avenue would be to search NYT and Washington Post for any political reporters with the initials "CF."

>>156052996It was Clinton Foundation and this was what they were going to throw Frank under the bus for via Uranium. The story broke and thought if the rest came out they'd have to sacrifice a big fish and it would've been Frank.

But because tgey thought Hillary would win, they held back on addressing it publicly, hoping they could ignore through the elections. He's a huge CF and campaign donor too so didn't want to expend him if they didn't have to cause they needed him.

I know it's the ny post y'all, and this one is actually two days late because first reports of this actually started coming out 11/3/16, but does factually include what's important so I'm too lazy to dig. You can find more though.

Frank's even making news now with uranium, which is why Nunes is looking at it now. ;o)

Here is the full quote from the Hill article for context: "Page mentions a conversation she had just had with FBI chief of staff James Rybicki and openly expressed concern the information about the FBI’s timeline was too specific for comfort in the article.

“Sorry, Rybicki called. Time line article in the post (sic) is super specific and not good. Doesn’t make sense because I didn’t have specific information to give.”

A few days earlier Strzok texted Page about another new article, suggesting it was anti-FBI. “Yep, the whole tone is anti-Bu. Just a tiny bit from us,” he wrote.

Page texted she had seen the article. “Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus to the forthcoming CF article,” she texted. Congressional investigators are still trying to determine what the “CF article” reference means and who the agents thought they were trying to throw “under the bus.”"

Again, referring to "Clinton Foundation" as "CF" in this context doesn't make sense (to me, anyway)

>>156055528Because Frank was directly implicated in the shady missing millions in CF tranactions directly related to what we now now as the Russia uranium desks. They weren't going to throw Hillary or Bill right?! Frank was only other one with the direct ties and access to that money and those uranium transactions they could blame it on if story picked up traction just before election. They'd have just blamed the deal on frank l, claim they didn't know what he was doing and cut his ties, like it was the ethical thing to do. Hence, they'd throw him under the bus.

Given what we know about Strzok and his whore Lisa Page, that is their love of everything Clinton, I strongly doubt they had any plans to do any damage to anyone in the Clinton orbit. They were working with Clinton forces to thwart Trump.

Fuck that. I want to deliver Justice right to their doorstep. All we need is an aggressive prosecutor and serious criminal charges against one of these turds. Put 5 to 10 years in the pokie in front of them and then see if they really want to take one for the team or roll over like the little bitches we all know they are. No FBI agent wants to be in general prison population for obvious reasons.

>>156056108They'd have thrown him under the bus to the forthcoming CF article they knew was coming out ahead of time.

I think you're thinking too much about the "Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus TO the forthcoming CF article". If that's the case, I can explain better...

Strzok knewctge articke was coming so they made the decision to tie frank to uranium via a leak Strzok made. Remember I told y'all he was a spook and he's a docs and memos guy?! He was "S" in palpatine's Revenge Gliph [pic related] chats who'd leak memos on turkey to msm - Waco and limey (Louise mensch) to create narratives in news they knew were coming.

They knew a few articles in late October had started coming out typing the Clinton foundation to uranium transactions with Russia. They waited it out to see how much traction and attention it would get, hoping not much. If it did get more, which it did over the next two weeks (hence 11/5-11/15 dares you're citing) they were going to, then eventually did, draft more fake news memos they'd leak, to drive the attention and discussion to Frank, who they threw under the bus, after trying not to.

>>156056094"In one string of text messages just five days before Election Day 2016, Page, the lawyer, alerted Strzok, the counterintelligence agent, to a story in The Washington Post about a timeline in the controversial Hillary Clinton email investigation."

>>156057198>>156056978>>156056917>>156056876I read it as they threw another agent/reporter under the bus by discrediting what he was saying about the CF investigation. In other words, they denied the veracity of the dirt on the Clintons.

>A few days earlier Strzok texted Page about another new article, suggesting it was anti-FBI. “Yep, the whole tone is anti-Bu. Just a tiny bit from us,” he wrote.

>Page texted she had seen the article. “Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus to the forthcoming CF article,” she texted. Congressional investigators are still trying to determine what the “CF article” reference means and who the agents thought they were trying to throw “under the bus.”

So there's what these two adulterers consider an anti-FBI article and later an article about someone involved in that story later that make "him" look bad, probably regarding the Clinton Foundation.

>>156056389They were never in a relationship. She was his point person. Their comms cover was a relationship so if ever exposed, could be blamed and positioned legally as negligent with classified/sensitive info, but not reckless.

Happens all the time with contracted spooks. You all keep missing what I've said since the beginning. Strzok is NOT FBI. He is only being positioned as FBI because he was employed by the FBI UNDER CONTRACT. He is a literal, physical example of an actual spook, or shadow l, deep state operative, whatever you choose call it.

I don't know who his actual employer at the time the FBI contracted him. He could've been independent, or ran 1099's from FBI through CrowdStrike, MI6, etc. but this is why you can't find anything on him and this is why they need you to believe he's FBI and not to dig deeper. If you did, you could probably tie him to Steele and CrowdStrike direct. Strzok helped create the dossier for CrowdStrike. He helped create and assemble half the docs that filled the fake "guccifer 2.0" files "hacked", Awan helped aggregate the rest with him. Strzok and Awan are the fake guccifer 2.0. Trust me.

Hmmmm.... that's not a bad theory. I don't recall the dates.... Was Clinton Foundation heavy in the news right around then? Probably was right before the election. Whore Page's txt message does say the subject article is "forthcoming" so we could test your theory by looking for pro-Clinton Foundation articles that came out in that time frame. Whatever they are referring to must have been published within a week or two of early November, with a heavy probability that it was published before Nov. 7 (election day) as all of the pro-Clinton puff pieces would be target to occur before the election...

>>156057449Well they technically threw them under the bus, too because they created the fake press releases they leaked and fed to the reporters they used but in reality, those leaks threw Frank under the bus, as related to this context directly. They leaked bullshit to msm reporters in their pockets all they time. Technically they threw them all under the bus, every day. That's not what this is referring to.

>>156057449To be clear. They were discrediting the connection to Hillary and the CF with uranium being reported, by throwing Frank under the bus via the leaks they planted which implicated him, instead of Hillary. Frank became a patsy. Make sense?!

What happened? None of this is necessarily an indication of malice or negligence on the part of Baier, or the Journal. His sources seem to have misled him, which is bad but happens to everyone on occasion. But why, and who were they? On Wednesday, before Baier’s story, my colleague Adam Serwer considered the surfeit of leaks dribbling out of the FBI, writing, “It seems clear that key officials at the bureau no longer feel that the rules against politicized disclosures apply to them.”>https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/tracking-the-fbi-stories-about-clinton/506642/

Because they all thought Clinton was going to win and EVERYONE knows that if you help the Clintons get away with their shit, you're in for promotions, favors and the like. I think they were sloppy because they didn't think Trump had a chance in winning and it goes without saying that anyone that helped Team Clinton wouldn't be called-out let alone prosecuted. Imagine being one of the FBI agents that saw this shit going down and wanting to whistle blow it. Fucking instant career killer right there, you're thinking, given the high probability that Clinton wins.

I'm betting Office of Inspector General's phone was ringing off the hook at 8am on Nov. 8.

>>156056917Thanks for clearing that up. Btw are the rest of the palpatines revenge glyph messages going to be made public? Think I've only seen 3 different screens including that one. Think you've mentioned that a large part of the "10,000" texts are these messages from this hidden message board.

>>156052996>In a series of text messages occurring just before the Nov. 7, 2016 election>to the forthcoming CF articleWhat if it never came out, due to the election?Like if it was about the Clinton Foundation, or by someone initialed CF, but could only be released if Clinton was in power so they stomped on it & never released it?

Not bad, Anon. This is the most promising lead so far. Would make sense if whore Page was Bret Baier's source and what she meant by "throwing him under the bus" was that she was his source and gave him bunk info only to rip the rug out after he published. But that would be risky as some reporters that get burned by their sources burn right back by disclosing the source.... Another possibility is that after Baier article, whore Page calls a friendly reporter and "throws Baier under the bus" by giving the friendly reporter info that allows that reporter to disprove Baier's article...

>>156059084>burn right backWhore Page probably assumes he wouldn't dare. What with her being part of the active Clinton partisans and Baier presumably know that they have six ways to Sunday to get back at ya. Her tone certainly seems to indicate that she does not fear retribution of any kind.

But then we know they have hubris to spare. Or at least had. JAIL TIME WHEN

>>156057976The committee knows. They're peppering the msm because these texts prove strzok did more than change language and wording on a few docs. He drafted the fuss's with rice and forged power as thecrequestor, too. Hecabd rice drafted the fish's with thecfajecdossier Strzok made based on the requirements Rice confirmed and ensure the dossier would include, to get the fisa's approved.

Then because Rice couldn't actually draft AND approve the requests they'd submit, they forged them under Power and she testified to this. She testified she did not draft orbsubmit those requests with her name on it. Rice and Strzok did, then she approved, signed off on them herself and submitted to fisa courts for ruling.

And all of this, is a big part of Flynn's story they wouldn't accept his voluntary testimony on and blocked his requests for, soninstead, he "lied" to the fucking FBI, knowing they'd have to indict him and when they did, it would FORCE HIS TESTIMONY, ON THE RECORD so he pled guilty and walked, just like I promised y'all he (and Manafort) would, months ago... because Flynn is a bad ass fucking Patriot.

You'll realize THIS will be what got Rice indicted, when she's unsealed. Then?! They blast her on Benghazi. End of story.

It was Samantha Powers that reportedly tied to "hundreds" of unmaskings. She claimed that someone else used her name (uh huh...) on those unmasking requests. Did Suan Rice claim the same thing? I don't recall seeing that....

Saw somewhere today (now I can't find sauce) that DOJ-OIG report is due out on January 15? I read previously that it was coming out in Q1 2018.

Given the demotions and firings at DOJ and FBI, me thinks the DOJ-OIG is going to drop bombs on these characters. THAT investigation has been very hush-hush. Only info leaked appears to be in connection with the DOJ-OIG contacting Team Mueller and Team Wray/Rosenstein with heads up that they need to get rid of some peeps asap because embarrassment incoming. Once that info got out of DOJ-OIG, it gets out into the wild because every other government institution leaks like no tomorrow.

But it's very possible the OIG has been surveilling some of these clowns and monitoring communications. Could be loads of comfy fun incoming.

"Too specific" almost undoubtedly is reference to whore Page's leaking info to a reporter who used that info too literally in an anti-Trump article. As in, the information in the article was "too specific" such that the source could only be identified as someone in the FBI.

Should note that the Hill article quotes of the texts seems to indicate to some degree that Strzok and whore Page were not acting in concert with the "rest of the team" in leaking to reporters as Strzok said something along the lines of "should I report to the rest of the team the Article that you were the source on, my little lawyer whore?"

>>156059426Haha, nah. If this is true, then I only hope David Brock's staff of $13.25/hr tweens, flag and tag this so he can see me, telling him, that he can go fuck himself. He's irrelevant to everyone everywhere and all the people who've kept his chop shop afloat financially, are out of both money and time. So is he.

>>156059617They make it look like they're screwing so they have plausible deniability. They make it look like they're in a relationship, speaking candidly, making unintentional mistakes. Not having reckless, malicious conversations. They were not fucking. This isn't like some new thing, BTW. This is an old strategy. This is why you even see intel agents/contractors fake married in real life. Did you not see Mr. and Mrs. Smith?!

>>156060235Fan-fucking-tastic. I can't wait. After seeing them awhile ago from you I was dying to see more considering the absolute bombshell of the message (and the meaning) you point out here >>156061327

Flynn is a goddamn hero and cannot wait til all those who fucking cheered when he was taken in, get this shoved up their collective ass' s like I have to one or two people irl. Cannot wait til he's free to talk publicly along with his testimony.

>>156052996Guys these are all lawyers at the FBI. Perhaps "article" doesn't refer to a publication, but a legal instrument? Could Page have been talking about an upcoming rule change to FBI policy, and someone getting thrown under the bus for violating it?

>Legal Definition. n. A separate and distinct part of a written instrument, such as a contract, statute, or constitution, that is often divided into sections. A written instrument, containing a series of rules and stipulations that are each designated as an article.

But you nice leafs up there who comment on my posts, need to get to your own swamp. You have a golden opportunity with Benji and Iran protests and attention right now, to expose Trudeau and honestly, I'm not exactly sure why you're not posting a MCGA general thread every single day until it's done. I told y'all about the pizza ties months ago, which are starting to come out now related to his dad. On top of, with Iran/Israel, there's no better time as he's neck deep with them. Trudeau has sold y'all down the river, just like the publicly sobbing, groomed political plant he was unironically destined to be. So, while I'd never tell you what you should do, I will only suggest what I would do, and I'd start that discussion, like yesterday.

Negative. When new government lawyer took over the case for prosecution, he/she read the file and saw direct evidence of prosecutorial misconduct mainly dealing with the prosecution's failure to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense before trial. Good lawyer reported this to Judge. Judge declared mistrial like 2 weeks ago and just today dismissed the case (I think with prejudice). Peeps from DOJ getting disbarred and potential criminal indictments. AND, Bundys have a nice Civil case now so they should end up making millions. Good for them. FBI fucks. For people like Clinton who commit real and damaging felonies, the FBI works overtime to let them off the hook. But a poor rancher is bo-fuck middle of nowhere? Swarm! Swarm! Swarm! Fucking joke.

"A few days earlier" (BEFORE Nov 3) is where we will find>"Strzok texted Page about another new article, suggesting it was anti-FBI. “Yep, the whole tone is anti-Bu. Just a tiny bit from us,” he wrote.">“Makes me feel WAY less bad about throwing him under the bus to the forthcoming CF article,” she texted. Congressional investigators are still trying to determine what the “CF article” reference means and who the agents thought they were trying to throw “under the bus.”"So this "anti-Bu" article that makes Page not feel so bad about throwing The Person under the bus is a few days BEFORE Nov 3.Could be this about Baier from 10/28/2016, makes FBI sound like they're helping Trump which would be anti-FBI in Strzok's opinion:from Daily Beast:>https://archive.fo/fNuTJ

Then The Person is referenced again in an article that will be out sometime after this, which includes the CF info. This is the article where Page has thrown The Person under the bus, which may be >>156058313, where Baier apologizes for being mistaken (because he was thrown under the bus) on Nov 4thFrom Atlantic:>https://archive.fo/03KWo

Not sure what Page & Baier's relationship was like before this, probably not great if Page seems to hate republicans so much

My speculation: They were trying to make contact with other reporters to pass on damaging, anti-Trump information. They may have been trying to use family members as a cut-out, but that's not very sophisticated tradecraft.

>>156052996Enough with the "whore page" every time you write her name unless you do something likewise to shame Strzok. They were both married and cheating on their spouses. Not sticking up for Page, but I'm getting of the unequal treatment.

>>156055263Actually explains why she'd "feel WAY less bad" (why feel bad if it was a political opponent?). Also "under the bus" usually implies some type of back stabbery. But why did she feel way less bad? Was Frank planning to do the same to Clinton? Are there any documents that record Frank attacking clinton in the media immediately before the text was sent?

>>156066553No I think it was that they threw him under the bus preemptively. She feels better because it turns out that he really did need to be thrown under the bus vs preemptively throwing under the bus with ultimately no reason to.

>>156069352No because if I could or did, then my big pond of anonymity amongst many potential fish, would feel a whole lot like a PetSmart-sized glass bowl.

But let's get real... what do you think?! Not that it would even matter though. The names and faces with these people are fleeting and short-lived. You'd never know if it was his name or not abd if you found another name, there wouldn't be much background, if anything, on that either. That's just how this works, which is why it's not important to focus it dig too hard for too long on details that never existed in the first place.

>>156069842Well, we shall soon see if Mr. Strzok takes the 5th as to his name. There aren't many Strzoks in the US, so if we dig, we won't have to dig far.

But his face? Would he go so far to get plastic surgery to alter his face? Given the publicity he has received, and all the more he is going to get, you would think someone would recognize him and say "Hey, your name isn't Peter Strzok, at least it wasn't when I went to high school with you."

>>156052996Conor Friedersdorf,CONOR FRIEDERSDORFConor Friedersdorf Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction.

>>156071674“FBI Director James Comey was driven in part by a fear of leaks from within his agency when he decided to tell Congress the FBI was investigating newly discovered emails related to Hillary Clinton, law enforcement sources said on Thursday.” There’s a peculiar logic to this course of action—the only way to stop an unauthorized leak interfering with the election is to turn it into an authorized annoucement!—but the suggestion that Comey is running scared is disconcerting.

>>156064234>>156063845>family drtailsGuys- these two are idiots. You're overthinking this. Most in GS (in fact, 99.999999%) are idiot-tier. These aren't masterminds- see: The Peter Principle. They were most assuredly banging- Strzok is clearly more intelligent than Page- so Strzok is playing the ditz to get laid. But both are idiots. The reporter's family/kids was a simple verification to scout him out and leak to him. Nothing nearly as James Bond-ish or nefarious as being implied here. They were merely attempting to find him out, get a back door, and leak to him. That's all- and certainly damning and nefarious enough. Please don't overplay it- it ruins the redpilling of normies because even idiot normies can see the "oh meh gehrd they're threatening some (((reporter's))) kids" tack as insane. Believe me, convincing conspiracy theorist autists is a fool's errand. 1. They're already convinced and 2. They'll end up shitting up the whole endeavor by running through the tiwn square with their hair on fire and shoot up a pizza parlor owned by pedophile demons thereby inoculating the pedophile demons from much needed scrutiny.