Children appear to enjoy playing video games, and while there are undoubted benefits, various negative effects stem from this too. Let us consider the main issues, and then outline possible remedies.

Perhaps the major physical problem is the sedentary lifestyle which these games encourage, meaning that youngsters may incline to obesity or inadequate development. Added to this is the strain on eyesight resulting from excessive use of screens and consoles, meaning that children may suffer symptoms ofpoor vision. There are also concerns about impairment of reflexes due to the repetitive nature ofthe hand muscles when playing these games, and about the poor diet of convenience food which often accompanies this lifestyle. The most alarming psychological impact of such activities is possibly the risk of addiction, meaning that children become obsessed with the games and are unable to socialize with family or peers. This undermines their interpersonal skills and makes them underperform both academically and socially.

Turning to possible solutions, perhaps the immediate step would be to promote a more active lifestyle through exercise regimes or sports programs which would help to detoxify the lifestyles of children affected. This could be done through sponsorship of sports, or participation in competitive events such as races or matches, hopefully ameliorating the physical effects of excessive games use. Potential remedies for the danger of mental addiction may be, firstly, an initiative to raise awareness of the risks of the situation, for example through health warnings on games packaging or through high-profile spokespersons spreading such a message. For example, if sports champions or figureheads speak out about these dangers, the message may well get through to children.

To sum up, the risks posed by excessive gaming are connected to an unhealthy lifestyle and the possibility of dependency on the activity. Possible answers might involve stronger education about the dangers and the health benefits of more active pursuits.

Scientific findings have clearly
indicated that the excessive consumption of fast food is leading the health of
people to deterioration. According to some people, this unhealthy practice can
be stopped by means of education; however, some others have little faith in this solution. As the supporters of each
view have their own justifications, whether education is effective remains to
be seen in this essay.

On the one hand, raising the
awareness of people towards the dangers of unhealthy food can certainly yield
some promising outcomes. Firstly, many fast food products provide very little
or no information on the nutritional content in them, deterring the consumers
from knowing the amount of fat, sodium or cholesterol which they take in. By
being informed of how much of these harmful substances is contained in their
favourite hamburgers or chips, as well as being shown the likely consequences
of over-eating these foods, consumers can be more cautious the next time they
choose their food.
Secondly, education at
schools can help
to form healthy
eating habits for children
and parents. For
instance, schools can
hold some extracurricular activities
such as growing and selling
vegetables with the attendance of both students and parents, in order to
promote the benefits of healthy diets and warn against the potential risks of
junk food.

On the other hand, some people
doubt the effectiveness of education for certain reasons. To begin with,
despite being aware of the negative effects of fast food, many people who are
too busy persist to eat it due to its being convenient and time-saving. In this
case, education hardly makes a difference as they have made a choice. In
addition, compared with the wide range and availability of fast food stores and
menus, healthy food is seriously limited. Furthermore, healthy food is commonly
inferior to fast food in terms of taste and prices as a matter of fact. As a
result, however convincing education is, it is almost impossible for people to
change their eating habit without a ready alternative to their unhealthy food
choices.

In conclusion, people have
different opinions about whether to support education so as to reduce people’s
consumption of fast food. In my opinion, education can be a viable measure with
careful consideration of other impediments.

The prevention of illness and
disease is a challenging problem for any community. Although many people may be
skeptical about the effectiveness of an investment in improving the environment
and providing more housing for the public, I believe that it is a good solution
to the issue, as will now be discussed.

On the one hand, ameliorating
environmental contamination can hinder the spread of disease and illness.
Today, people’s health is deteriorating due to the adverse effects of poor air
quality, making us more vulnerable to viruses and health problems. A number of urban citizens suffer
from lung cancer and throat cancer due to the dangerous level of exhaust
emissions from traffic and industrial activities in many big cities such as
Beijing and Hanoi. Therefore, improving the environment should be treated as
the top priority among other concerns of the government. For example, an
outright ban on the use of private vehicles can decrease the amount of harmful
fumes released into the atmosphere, contributing to the clean-up of the
environment.

On the other hand, the provision
of more accommodation for the public is also a highly effective measure to
reduce health risks. Many people are still homeless in society while many
others have to live in slums under poor living conditions with poor access to
medical services when they are sick. This triggers the rise of endemic diseases
such as malaria in society, putting the life of other citizens in jeopardy. By
providing more social apartments of affordable prices and incentives for the
poor, the government would not only mitigate the dearth of housing but also
prevent disease and illness effectively at an early stage.

In conclusion, it is my belief
that environmental pollution and lack of housing are root causes of the
proliferation of illnesses and diseases in society, requiring the government to
take actions to tackle the problem.

Many people in the world
currently choose not to eat meat in their daily meals. While I accept that this
tendency can help people to live healthily, I believe not everyone should
become vegetarian.

In my opinion, there are several
benefits of being vegetarian. Firstly, since the re are many types of
vegetables that can provide people with enough nutrients, it has become less
necessary for people to eat
meat. For example,
potatoes and beans
are two popular
dishes for families
in England because of the large amount of calories they can provide. Secondly, vegetables and fruits
contain vitamins that are highly beneficial for people. For instance, it has
been proven that eating an apple every day can help individuals improve their
health and avoid illness. Finally, if more people refuse to eat meat, fewer
animals will be slaughtered.

However, I believe this tendency
is not suitable for everyone. First, it is not advisable for children to become
vegetarian. As they are in the process of growing up, they need to eat a wide
range of food, including meat which contains essential nutrients, to improve
their physical health. If children only eat vegetables, they might become less
healthy than they should be. Furthermore, athletes are the people who should
not be vegetarian. Since their job involves intense training on a regular basis,
they need to consume meat such as beef or pork which provides them with enough
calories.

In conclusion, while I agree
that becoming vegetarian can help people have a healthy diet, I do not think it
is an option that everybody should take.