Welcome Guest. Please login or register.The column on the left includes the "Best of NumisWiki" menu.If you are new to collecting, start with Ancient Coin Collecting 101.All blue text is linked. Keep clicking to endlessly explore.Welcome Guest. Please login or register.The column on the left includes the "Best of NumisWiki" menu.All blue text is linked. Keep clicking to endlessly explore.If you have written a numismatic article, please add it to NumisWiki.

Silver Content of Parthian Drachms

Below are the silver contents of 37 Parthian drachms; the figures ignore the odd one or two percent of gold in some coins, which was probably introduced as an impurity in the silver. Dates are according to Caley (1955):

1) Arsaces I(?) 250-248 BCE 94.6% silver(There is no certainty that Arsaces ever minted coins; his successors Tiridates I (248/7-210) and Arsaces II (210-191) both used his name on their coinage, and this may well be a mistaken attribution)

Clearly, the finest coins are the very early ones, with some debasement taking place at some point after the reign of Mithridates I. The coins of Orodes I are debased, with the very wide variation possibly pointing to successive debasement, apparently with bronze, through his reign. The coinage subsequently recovers, so this probably points to economic problems during a single reign. As Orodes' reign overlaps with that of Mithridates II (123-88 BCE), whose coins are unfortunately not included in the analysis, it is likely that, during at least part of his reign, he only controlled part of Parthia. His reign ushered in the confused 'Dark Age' of Parthian history, where the exact succession is still unclear.

The subsequent recovery of the coinage indicates that re-minting of coin was not taking place to any great extent. The Roman practice of successive debasements was clearly not followed.