Here's a truly worthless word:(from poetry glossary)PANTOUM A poem in a fixed form, consisting of a varying number of 4-line stanzas with lines rhyming alternately; the second and fourth lines of each stanza are repeated to form the first and third lines of the succeeding stanza, with the first and third lines of the first stanza forming the second and fourth of the last stanza, but in reverse order, so that the opening and closing lines of the poem are identical. Sidelight: The pantoum is derived from the Malayan pantun, which follows the same rhyme and line patterns but differs in some other respects. In the pantun, which is traditionally improvised, the theme or meaning is conveyed in the second two lines of each quatrain, while the first two lines present an image or allusion which may or may not have an obvious connection with the theme.

It's hardly a useless word. In fact, it becomes essential when a couple or more poets gather and discuss a pantoum written or read by any of those present. I, myself, have written a pantoum or two, and have discussed the pantoums written by my peers and predecessors.

Victor Hugo and Charles Baudelaire found the form interesting enough to produce enough pantoums to start a trend in the nineteenth century.

In recent years, poets Carolyn Kizer and John Ashbery have produced, respectively, "Parent's Pantoum" and "Pantoum".

Perhaps pantoum is an obscure term of art, but in its own little corner of the world, it remains an essential word which performs the function of naming a lively and useful form.

Happy to share. I can't post a poem for which I don't own usage rights. Hugo and Baudelaire wrote in French, most English translations are recent and thus have active copyrights, as do Ashbery's and Kizer's poems. As for websites who have published pantoums, I assume that this website has the same policy any good website has: don't link to other sites without their permission.

Here's how to find a pantoum worth reading: the following search terms yielded good results for me on Google. If you follow one or two of the resulting links, you'll find an example by Hugo. I liked the site by Greg Barta.

I assume that this website has the same policy any good website has: don't link to other sites without their permission.

this is patently ridiculous; of the 100s of sites that have linked to wwftd over the years, only a handful have asked my permission.* I doubt that the sort of links that get posted here on almost a daily basis have resulted in much cause for concern at headquarters.

or..

I guess there are darn few "good websites".

*otoh, I've only asked two or three to remove their links for one reason or another.

with feet striking alternately; the second and fourth feet of each stride are repeated to form the first and third steps of the succeeding stride, with the first and third steps of the first stride forming the second and fourth of the last stride, but in reverse order

I don't know what a pantoumime horse would look like but it's hellish to ride!

Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site.
Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to
hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.