RMBS investors face potential losses either way

Only 10% of loan modifications studied by CoreLogic (CLGX) in the past four years involved principal write-downs, while interest rate reductions remained the preferred tool for minimizing the risk of foreclosure across the United States.

But analysts with Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services claim in a new study that principal reductions overall perform much better than loans receiving a mere interest rate reduction.

In a report titled, "How Principal and Interest Rate Modifications Affect U.S. RMBS," the ratings giant notes that the recidivism rate – or likelihood of a new default – hovers above 50% for rate reductions, while borrowers who obtain the benefit of a write-down and equity gains generally have a better chance of staying current on their mortgages afterward.

The only problem is what benefits the borrower is often a nuisance for investors in residential mortgage-backed securities.

If a borrower obtaining a write-down does fail to pay and re-defaults, S&P says the eventual liquidation of the home will lead to higher loss severity rates for RMBS investors.

In fact, the resulting losses will be worse than if the home had just been foreclosed on early on.

However, if the deal includes loss triggers, senior bondholders can pull extra principal from subordinate classes once the stated triggers are met.

Interest rate reductions come with their own downside, the report suggested.

For example, on a deal with interest coupons paid from all funds clearly defined, the weighted average coupon — or average gross interest rate of the underlying mortgage pool — can lead to more principal being pulled from a deal to cover interest that is due when an interest reduction disrupts the deal.

This could eventualy lead to write-downs on subordinate classes and declining credit support for senior classes, the report claims.

"In comparison, on a deal that contains pass-through WAC coupons paid from available interest, a material WAC deficiency could short interest on both subordinate and seniors bonds, without necessarily impairing credit enhancement," the S&P researchers concluded.

Related Articles

Kerri Ann Panchuk was the Online Editor of HousingWire.com, and regular contributor to HousingWire magazine. Kerri joined HousingWire as a Reporter in early 2011 and since earned a law degree from Southern Methodist University. She previously worked at the Dallas Business Journal.

This month inHousingWire magazine

While other state and federal regulatory bodies overlap in their regulation of the mortgage industry, the very particular consumer focus of the CFPB is not duplicated by any other body. Will deregulation mean a return to the Wild West lending atmosphere that led to the financial crisis? What happens next? We asked John Socknat, partner at Ballard Spahr, to weigh in on what mortgage lenders and servicers can expect from a Trump administration.

Feature

Amid the potential new direction from the White House, Congress and regulators, leadership in our industry is more important than ever. Which is why HousingWire is proud to present the 40 winners of our 2016 Vanguard award. These leaders from all segments of the mortgage ecosphere demonstrate that our industry is more than capable of meeting the challenges that lie ahead.

Commentary

The marketplace is full of hard and private money lenders — it will come down to who can best assist investors in completing their goals, whether that be by providing quicker close times, or with more accurate valuations. With how many options there are for borrowers, lenders will need to start competing for marketshare as borrowers shop their situations to multiple lenders, leveraging the offers against each other. This process will force lenders to update their guidelines, or be forced out of the market.