Sheesh. Sometimes you can't fix stupid. I've told the story before where my mom beat it out of "that guy" in class. But your guy, Bigskymma, your guy takes the cake, ate it, and told Chef Ramsey he used too much flour.

If you'd stop using that annoying font I'd ask you to post it again, as I missed it, as probably did 98% of BS, being that there's a ton of threads.

"Preparing mentally, the most important thing is, if you aren't doing it for the love of it, then don't do it." - Benny Urquidez

His point sounds like that 'inherent physical inferiority of women [in regards to athletics]' is a defensibly valid statement. If we separate humans into the categories of men and women, and use the definition that anyone without a y chromosome is female, then women have natural physical inferiorities to overcome. Consequently, they're more likely to be picked out for bullying by douchey walk-ins.

Kindof like saying 'the natural physical inferiority of guys under 6 foot' doesn't account for the fact that plenty of strong short guys could beat up plenty of tall weak guys, but is still a totally valid observation.

Because statistical anomalies aren't indicative of the overall trend. Your argument is the same as 'there's this one super strong kid in the Ukraine who can bench X amount of weight that an avergae adult man would struggle to lift therefore all children are stronger than average adult men.' That is a stupid argument.

Originally Posted by Suprore

His point sounds like that 'inherent physical inferiority of women [in regards to athletics]' is a defensibly valid statement. If we separate humans into the categories of men and women, and use the definition that anyone without a y chromosome is female, then women have natural physical inferiorities to overcome. Consequently, they're more likely to be picked out for bullying by douchey walk-ins.

Makes me miss my old school. We had a strick no asshole policy (actually had a sign above the mat stating this). Had very few rule breakers but one was a hygenically challenged fellow who preferred rolling without a shirt and without a shower, yuck. After an outbreak of ringworm which he owned up to after the fact we tossed his dumbass, wouldn't have tossed him for this except he knew he had ringworm but showed up and rolled without a shirt anyway.

I suppose we were lucky. I had more characters than "that guys" show up. I had a student who was a 6' 10", black , amature luchador. Once we had a Kali instructor show up trying to find a place to teach. He was really good and we would have loved to have him but he insisted on only teaching with machetes.

How about the larper? Is that a "that guy"? I had one student who was a belt collector bent on inventing his own style. He was so busy trying to make up for his social inability and poor living habits with martial arts that he never could manage to be a real person beyond class. He knew a lot of stuff but wasn't really able to use it so he only ended up pissing off other students by trying to correct them and explain that he knew better. He also made frequent use of the to deadly argument with a lot of what he knew.