You're saying my team cant perform then? Only lost 5 competitive matches this season, currently on a run of 11 competitive games against fairly decent teams. Also in my friendlies this season, i beat Kwicket a 120+k team by 50 runs, Ricky Town, a 114+k team by a wicket, Trincomalee Tricksters by 136 runs, and Twelfth Men, a 108+k team by 7 wickets.

Would take one of my Expert-Reliable bats over one of your Reliable-Reliable bats with experience any day of the week. Also would take any of my 6 bowlers over any bowler that will be pasted in this thread.

Was more commenting on the fact that Earlobe doesn't think his players are good enough even though they get 120k ratings. As well as the lack of a certain former NT all rounder from Otago. It is not all about you.

Anyway the fact part of your reason your ratings improved was by buying in experienced players, which replaced some inexperience players with better stats. Probably say a fair bit about experience for mine.

Since when do ratings win matches? I didnt bring those players in to improve my ratings, i actually think my U19 bats would give me higher ratings then my openers. I bought them in because of either their talents, or in the case of Pradip because he is an absolute gun.

Since when do ratings win matches? I didnt bring those players in to improve my ratings, i actually think my U19 bats would give me higher ratings then my openers. I bought them in because of either their talents, or in the case of Pradip because he is an absolute gun.

Experience is general what wins you matches and it the extra experience in your side now that imo is the main reason for your better performances. Both the extra experience of your top players and the guys you brought.

Anyway that would be my side, decent blend of experience and high talents. Alot of decent RFS unlikely to miss out. But took a punt on Dwyer wristie. Need a few decent openers though to balance out the side and maybe a could more bowlers with game related special talents.