For over three decades, Chevron chose profit over people in the Ecuadorian Amazon.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

New York State Comptroller Thomas Dinapoli: What Chevron Owes the People of Ecuador

Today, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli escalated his public effort to demand Chevron seek an equitable settlement with the communities of the Ecuadorian Amazon over the oil giant's devastation of their rainforest lands.

In an oped in the Huffington Post entitled 'What Chevron Owes the People of Lago Agrio', Comptroller DiNapoli writes:

There's a bitter irony in the voices of residents of Lago Agrio, or 'Sour Lake' in Spanish, when they mention the name of their northeast Ecuadorian hometown. Once a prosperous base for Amazonian drilling operations for sulfur-rich 'sour crude' petroleum, Lago Agrio is now the center of what amounts to an industrial cancer zone larger than the state of Rhode Island. Its population is surrounded by poisoned farmland and heavily polluted waterways and burdened with elevated rates of disease.

Now, the battle over responsibility for this region's current condition is at the center of an expensive and extensive legal struggle between Chevron, the giant multinational energy company, and Lago Agrio's persistent indigenous people. A U.S. Appeals Court decision last Monday in New York makes it more likely than ever that Chevron will be forced to make a massive payout to the people of the Ecuadorian Amazon.

While Ecuador is nearly 3,000 miles away from New York, the final outcome of this case could have an impact on the New York State pension fund. As Comptroller, I serve as trustee of New York's $146.9 billion Common Retirement Fund which holds nearly $780 million worth of Chevron stock. The Fund benefits when its portfolio companies remain profitable by pursuing responsible and sustainable business policies in the communities in which they operate. Chevron is no exception.

The Lago Agrio oped expands on the Comptroller's previous calls for Chevron to take a new approach to the "marathon litigation," as he calls it. Back in May, in the lead-up to Chevron's 2011 shareholders meeting at the company's headquarters in San Ramon, CA, Comptroller DiNapoli circulated a sign-on letter amongst Chevron institutional investors. The letter, with more than twenty signatories representing over $155 billion in assets under management, was sent to Chevron's management and board of directors. The New York State Office of the Comptroller also issued a press release detailing DiNapoli's efforts, in which the the Comptroller wrote, “It’s time for Chevron to face reality.”

New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli

Today, Comptroller DiNapoli is giving a keynote luncheon speech at the Council of Institutional Investors fall meeting in Boston. I don't know whether he will mention the Chevron case in his address but you can bet that the oped will be making its rounds amongst the attendees, along with the news of last week's U.S. appeals court ruling that dealt a severe blow to Chevron's efforts to avoid paying the court-ordered multi-billion dollar damages award to clean up its disaster in Ecuador.

In the oped, the Comptroller recounts previous efforts to use his clout as a major investor and convince Chevron to shift its approach:

That second link ("...the company's battered reputation...") takes the reader to a fascinating letter, made public today for the first time; a November 2008 private letter from Comptroller DiNapoli to then-CEO David O'Reilly, in which the Comptroller writes:

As a significant and long-term institutional investor, I am deeply concerned by Chevron's actions in litigating this case and the repercussions those actions will have on the company's finances. It appears that Chevron's strategy remains that of denying responsibility for the contamination and, instead, protracting the legal proceedings. I question whether that strategy best serves the company and its shareholders.

Comptroller DiNapoli continues:

I am also troubled by what I perceive as a lack of adequate disclosure of the potential financial liability Chevron is facing. It is my understanding that, until its 10-Q filing of May 2008, Chevron did not disclose the magnitude of its potential liability in the event of an adverse outcome.

That letter was written nearly three years before Chevron's recent legal setback that clears the way for the Ecuadorian communities to pursue enforcement of the $18 billion judgment against the company. It was written over two years before that judgment even came from an Ecuadorian court.

Comptroller DiNapoli and his office have taken great pains to warn Chevron of the liability it faced, and the risk that poses to the company's investors, including many thousands of current and former public employees of New York State. But to extend an appropriate metaphor to its breaking point, the Chevron board has been asleep at the wheel while the company's senior management has apparently dropped a few sleeping pills in the back-seat. And somehow, they've all allowed a rabid, out-of-touch legal department and their fee-happy outside lawyers from behemoth corporate law firms to grab the wheel from the passenger's seat and drive the whole enterprise off of a cliff.

The Comptroller concludes his oped:

There's also a broader lesson to learn from Lago Agrio's story. Gulf coast residents are still grappling with the long-term environmental and economic effects of last year's Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The conclusion to draw from Chevron's case in Ecuador, and BP's $20 billion fund to compensate those victimized by the Deepwater Horizon disaster, could not be more clear: short term profits at the expense of environmental protection and human rights often cost companies more in the long term.

It's time for the energy industry to start afresh with a new approach to environmental responsibility and risk management, both domestically and internationally. Chevron must do what's right for its investors, and its future viability, by negotiating a fair settlement that restores the company's reputation. Chevron, its shareholders and the general public have not and will not benefit from a never-ending courtroom drama.

No comments:

Post a Comment

About This Blog

For over three decades, Chevron chose profit over people in the Ecuadorian Amazon. The cold and calculated decision to save $3 per barrel and yet poison entire communities is compounded daily as Chevron continues its PR campaign to suppress the truth and barrage the media with lies about its actions and responsibility. This blog is part of an ever-growing campaign to counter Chevron's misinformation tactics and speak frankly about their attempts to hide their role in the world's worst oil-related disaster.