After using the new version for a couple of days, i found that aesthetically it looks better with the side panel showing, but functionality is much better if the side panel is hidden. Makes it look and work closer to the older version.

Originally posted by Eric LeVine:I wish I could answer more substantively, but the Wine Spectator has now respectfully asked that I no longer engage in any way in any thread on CellarTracker other than to ask you to contact me via my own website or forum. Sorry folks.

That makes absolutely no sense! You are actually drawing people to WS, or at a minimum you are keeping them here. Given their logic, all talk about sports should be driven to ESPN or some other sports website. That is insane, pisses me off, frankly.

So, just to annoy those WS boneheads, I'm wondering if you have considered moving the "quantity" column back where it is in the Classic version. It's useful to be able to scroll down and see how many bottles I have of each wine. On smartphones, etc. the screen size does not allow one to see each wine and quantity. So, if the quantity column were to the left of the wine name, it would be more convenient. Other than that, I'm one happy camper (although unhappy with WS's idiotic paranoia).

********"But, if ye wish her grateful prayer,Gie her a haggis!" -Robert Burns

Originally posted by Eric LeVine:I wish I could answer more substantively, but the Wine Spectator has now respectfully asked that I no longer engage in any way in any thread on CellarTracker other than to ask you to contact me via my own website or forum. Sorry folks.

That makes absolutely no sense! You are actually drawing people to WS, or at a minimum you are keeping them here. Given their logic, all talk about sports should be driven to ESPN or some other sports website. That is insane, pisses me off, frankly.

Originally posted by Eric LeVine:Wine Spectator has now respectfully asked that I no longer engage in any way in any thread on CellarTracker other than to ask you to contact me via my own website or forum. Sorry folks.

Originally posted by Eric LeVine:I wish I could answer more substantively, but the Wine Spectator has now respectfully asked that I no longer engage in any way in any thread on CellarTracker other than to ask you to contact me via my own website or forum. Sorry folks.

You have always been a gentleman, Eric, and I trust you will respect their wishes.

Originally posted by Eric LeVine:Wine Spectator has now respectfully asked that I no longer engage in any way in any thread on CellarTracker other than to ask you to contact me via my own website or forum. Sorry folks.

I really prefer the old classic version because of its simplicity AND you could get to everything from the one main page...all the links were right there and there was no clutter. I'll keep with the classic mode because it does everything I want it to and more.

I've been using the new site since early beta, and while at first I wasn't a fan (mainly due to the Grape Stories change) I've long since used it almost exclusively when accessing by computer. For mobile, I still use the classic, as it just seems to run cleaner. The last feature I used the classic for on a regular basis was label printing, but Eric has since resolved that and the new site's functionality for that is great.

Originally posted by jesseix:I've been trying to get the new site to work for me but I'm still digging the classic site. Its more simple looking but in my opinion way easier to read and navigate. I like no-frills

I've been doing the same, but will hop over to the classic site once in awhile. I don't find the new site to be awful, just that it takes an extra click or two to do certain things.