Hmmm. I'd have to argue with that. The definitions are unhelpful,
pretentious, often incorrect and laden with poorly-thought-out
political ramblings.

Even on the key topic of "reflection", the author gets confused with
"reflexive" notions in mathematics, and states blandly that "Linux is
developed from Linux" and "Lisp programs deal with data which can be
Lisp programs". These are not blinding insights, so I can only
conclude that if reflection really is something radically new then he
has failed to explain it.