Even if cross-border services were to terminate at Tuas bus
terminal, I think the authorities should allow boarding/alighting
for cross-border services to take place at the bus stops for Tuas
Link MRT (like at Kranji MRT)?

All, Go Ahead Singapore announced the grand opening of the
extended portion of Punggol bus interchange on 1 oct 2017. The
berth B1 to B5 will be reorganized with buses being switched as
such.

B1: 3, 50, 136

B2: 83, 85, 382G, 382W

B3: 34, 62, 82, 386

B4: 119, 118, 381

B5: 43/43M, 84, 117.

Some obeservations are made. Good that they decide to put
3/83/85 close to each other just like now. This benefits Punggol
central (last 2 stops)/ Punggol east residents just like current
status. Good that they move the super long queue 118 to berth 4 to
thin out the crowds near the current entrance to mrt and near
office and canteen area. Good that they also move the long queue 34
to the other side of the exit at berth 3. Cheers. Thanks.

Even if cross-border services were to terminate at Tuas bus
terminal, I think the authorities should allow boarding/alighting
for cross-border services to take place at the bus stops for Tuas
Link MRT (like at Kranji MRT)?

But the tuas link bus stop seem pretty small to fit large crowds
that is usually expected of such cross borders services...

All, Go Ahead Singapore announced the grand opening of the
extended portion of Punggol bus interchange on 1 oct 2017. The
berth B1 to B5 will be reorganized with buses being switched as
such.

B1: 3, 50, 136

B2: 83, 85, 382G, 382W

B3: 34, 62, 82, 386

B4: 119, 118, 381

B5: 43/43M, 84, 117.

Some obeservations are made. Good that they decide to put
3/83/85 close to each other just like now. This benefits Punggol
central (last 2 stops)/ Punggol east residents just like current
status. Good that they move the super long queue 118 to berth 4 to
thin out the crowds near the current entrance to mrt and near
office and canteen area. Good that they also move the long queue 34
to the other side of the exit at berth 3. Cheers. Thanks.

IMO 119 and 382G should have been together... But since 381 is
with 119 it's still ok.

Got 3 kaypoh aunties go and survey the new berth saying that 119
is too far for them to board..Then what you want auntie?Board buses
already pay discount,BCs drive near to kerb for you,wait for
you,wait for you to be seated..Now complaining too far?Leg
pain?Then don't go out that often leh.

The bus service is empty bus service at the route upper
East coast terminal that not planning good enough for
the bus service 13 25 55 46 and 506 how come there are no any
of the problem is that not planning on the bus service
good enough and the results not many people who take the bus
service to get the area

I got a feeling that the terminal might be 'ulu' like CBP
terminal as I doubt many residents living around the area would
want to walk even further to the terminal itself when they can just
board at the bus stops at Kampong Bahru Rd. If you ask me, the
terminal could have been built further down at the forested area
beside MacAlister Rd so at least it would have been more convenient
for Jalan Bukit Merah and Tiong Bahru residents as compared to the
current location. The terminal could have been named, 'Tiong Bahru
Bus Terminal' in case 'Jalan Bukit Merah ' terminal sounds too
similar to the current BM int.

I got a feeling that the terminal might be 'ulu' like CBP
terminal as I doubt many residents living around the area would
want to walk even further to the terminal itself when they can just
board at the bus stops at Kampong Bahru Rd. If you ask me, the
terminal could have been built further down at the forested area
beside MacAlister Rd so at least it would have been more convenient
for Jalan Bukit Merah and Tiong Bahru residents as compared to the
current location. The terminal could have been named, 'Tiong Bahru
Bus Terminal' in case 'Jalan Bukit Merah ' terminal sounds too
similar to the current BM int.