If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

All transactions on PayPal and elsewhere are demanded to be redeemed in lawful money as found in Section 16 of the Fed Act and at Title 12 USC 411.

Thank you so much for enjoying StSC! If you are getting popups please try clearing your browser cache.

Inhisimage

Do you know the difference between

I am thinking about writing a book about knowing the difference between. Here is a sample chapter, Do you know the difference between the U.S. Post Office and the U.S. Postal Service? Too many people lack discernment and they do not know the difference between a great many things. They appear to uninformed, unaware and unconcerned.Bubba said, it sounds like they don't give a shit.

Here are possible chapter titles for the book
The difference between...

U.S. Post Office and the U.S. Postal Service
U.S. Treasury and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury
Alabama, the state and The State of Alabama
A god and The God
The Sabbath and Sunday
Being saved and Being Lost.

About being saved or lost, here is what the bible says concerning not knowing the difference between:

Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord , Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. Matthew 7:21-23

Do You Know The Difference?
Do you have a sense of “fairness”? Do you want to be treated equal? Do you support special treatment for others? Do you know it costs you about five times as much to mail the exact same package back to China, as the China man paid to mail it to you originally? Postal workers know this, but they don’t know why. The story below explains why and illustrates just how bad our government is screwed up.

“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools” Romans 1:22

They stole the damned Post Office!

Who is they? They are many who remain unknown, but it happened when Jimmy Carter was president and Winton Blount the Post Master General.

How did they do it? Like they do everything else, they created a separate entity with a similar sounding, but different name. Just like they did when they stole the U.S. Treasury. They took the United States Treasury and made a separate entity and called it The Secretary of the Treasury. People don’t understand the difference.

They took The U.S. Post Office, that’s the USPO, and made a separate entity and called it The U.S. Postal Service, that’s the USPS. People don’t understand the difference. [Bubba said, Oh! But the China man does! The China man uses the U.S. Post Office and you use the U. S. Postal Service. Big, Big, Difference. The China man is Non-Domestic …Just keep reading]

Cletus told Bubba: Post Office! Hell, they stole the whole, entire, damn country!
They took the Union of the states and made a separate entity and called it the United States. People don’t understand the difference. Big, big difference! If you want to be like the China man, you must live outside their United States and live on the land in one of the several states, then you can use the USPO instead of the USPS. You see, the USPS is only the “operator” of the Post Office. The USPS must operate the Post Office for those outside the “United States” according to the “UPU”. That is, the Universal Postal Union treaty [Berne, Switzerland] of October 9, 1874 and reaffirmed September 14, 2012 because; you see the China man also signed that same “TREATY”. It is called the Universal-Postal-Union treaty because it is a treaty among a Union of countries who signed on to it. It is Universal because it applies through out all countries…Africa, Canada, Russia, Japan, Brazil, Argentina, Cuba and on and on. Can you name a place you can not mail a letter to?
Amazing!….. ant it?

If you want to understand, you must KNOW you live outside the United States. You actually live on the land in one of the several states. The state, any state, is a member of the states United BUT, it is not the United States. Anyone of the states has boundaries. They each, one and all, have state lines. ANY one of the state’s jurisdiction stops at its state line. The United States also has boundaries. It has “lines”. The United States territory includes the ten square miles of Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam and the Marshal Islands. Its jurisdiction stops at it’s boundaries except…for what you don’t know….

As for as the post mail is concerned, if you can understand you, just like the China man, are outside the jurisdiction of the United States. Your mail is also non-domestic unless you are in one of their ZONES. People don’t understand the difference. Let me tell you, Satan rules this world and he has made it deliberately confusing. Christ said, “the world is like unto a field which a man sowed good seed and while he slept an enemy came in and sowed tares among the wheat” When plants are young it’s hard to tell the difference. When you don’t know, USPO –vs- USPS, it’s hard to tell the difference.

So, you can be in a Federal Zone and under the Jurisdiction of Washington or not. Its your choice. You can say you are “near” ZIP such and such……..You know words have meaning and….. “near” does not mean “in”…….. Big, Big difference

President Donald Trump said he was going to drain the swamp. He does not have a complete picture, no one does. The swamp is big, it is vast, it is humongous. You can’t get your mind around it. Kinda reminds me of the “tares among the wheat”. It is an impossible job. Our president is doing his damnedest to keep from pulling up the wheat when he gets the tares.

Enough of this. I’m only a two finger type’er. Look at the scanned labels where I ordered from the China man. Look at the postage he paid and then look at the postage quotes the USPS wants to send the same package to where it came from. Big, Big difference. I have tried to explain it to you. If you want a copy of the Universal Postal Treaty, I got one.

The China man sent me the package using the United States Post Office. The operator of the Post Office, the USPS wants big money to mail it back to China!

It helps when you know what you are talking about. “Jurisdiction” is: ….Juris-diction.
“Juris” is law. “Diction” is speech. When you cross the Alabama state line and go into Florida, the Alabama State Trooper can not “speak the law to you”. You are outside his jurisdiction.

Washington cannot, “speak the law” to the China man. The China man is outside the jurisdiction of D.C. But, sense the China man and Washington BOTH signed the UPU …. “IT” is the law unto them. In postal matters, the Universal Postal Treaty is their law. The UPU, in so far as concerning postal matters, is law for the whole damn world!

Citizenship is another equity agreement that we have with the Crown. And this is the very juristic contract that Federal judges will use to incarcerate them. In the words of former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, ?Equity is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements.? The balance of Title 42, section 1981 of the Civil Rights Code states, ??.citizens shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind?What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment instrumentality. It also should be borne in mind that even cursory circulation or commercial use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an attachment of liability for the payment of the Crown's debt to the FED. This is measured by your taxable income. And to facilitate future asset-stripping, the end of the 14th amendment includes a state of debt hypothecation of the United States, wherein all enfranchised persons (that's you) can be held personally liable for the Crown's debt.The Crown views our participation in these contracts of commercial equity as being voluntary and that any gain accrued is taxable, as the gain wouldn?t have been possible were it not for the Crown. They view the system of interstate banks as their own property. Any profit or gain experienced by anyone with a bank account (or loan, mortgage or credit card) carries with it ? as an operation of law ? the identical same full force and effect as if the Crown had created the gain.

Bank accounts fall outside the umbrella of Fourth Amendment protection because a commercial contract is in effect and the Bill of Rights cannot be held to interfere with the execution of commercial contracts. The Crown also views bank account records as their own private property, pursuant to the bank contract that each of us signed and that none of us ever read.

The rare individual who actually reads the bank contract will find that they agreed to be bound by Title 26 and under section 7202 agreed not to disseminate any fraudulent tax advice. This written contract with the Crown also acknowledges that bank notes are taxable instruments of commerce.

When we initially opened a bank account, another juristic personality was created. It is this personality (income and assets), a legal fiction (DOE, JOHN? rather than the natural born man John Doe)? that tax agents are excising back to the Crown through taxation. A lot of ink is being spilled currently over Social Security. Possession of a Social Security Number is known in the Crown's lex as ?conclusive evidence? of our having accepted federal commercial benefits. This is another example of an equity relationship with the Crown. Giving one's Social Security Number or Social Insurance Number to an employer seals our status as taxpayers, and gives rise to liability for a reciprocal quid pro quo payment of taxes to the Crown.

Through the Social Security Number we are accepting future retirement endowment benefits. Social Security is a strange animal. If you die, your spouse gets nothing, but rather, what would have gone to you is divided (forfeited) among other premium payers who haven?t died yet. The spoils

But the Crown views failure to reciprocate in any of these equity attachments as an act of defilement and will proceed against Me with all due prejudice. For a person to escape the tentacles of the Crown octopus, a thoroughgoing study of American jurisprudence is required. One would have to be deemed a 'stranger to the public trust,? forfeit all enfranchisement benefits and close all bank accounts, among other things. Citizenship would have to be made null and forfeit and the status of ?denizen? enacted. private persons extant who have passed through this fire, and formed privately a record have made the contract void. or can a bonded ss# be probated . An Act of Congress of June 25, 1910, established the Postal Savings System in designated Post Offices, effective January 1, 1911. The legislation aimed to get money out of hiding, attract the savings of immigrants accustomed to the postal savings system in their native countries, provide safe depositories for people who had lost confidence in banks, and furnish more convenient depositories for working people. The law establishing the system directed the Post Office Department to redeposit most of the money in the system in local banks, where it earned 2.5 percent interest. The Money Order. Bank Draft talk about hiding money. Legislative re investment re-venue immigrants wealth

There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as THE CITY OF LONDON,? the Square Mile, or simply ?THE CITY.?

Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into THE CITY walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.

The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.

The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America. To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter 's,? denotes a legal entity of the Crown.The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the populace. At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown. Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed. The Warranty Deed is only a ?color of title.? Color of Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.

invisible contracts include: birth certificates, citizenship records, employment agreements, driver's licenses and bank accounts. It is perhaps helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have they ever had to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by American judges. If it is written down, it is merely a written statement of the contract.

Tax protesters resorting to tort law (fairness) arguments as justification. Judges will reject these lines of defense as they have no bearing on contract law jurisprudence. Tort law governs grievances where no contract law is in effect.These private agreements/contracts that bind us will always overrule the broad general clauses of the Constitution and Bill of Rights (the Constitution being essentially a renamed enactment of English common law). The Bill of Rights is viewed by the Crown as a ?bill of benefits,? conferred on us by them in anticipation of reciprocity (taxes). Protestors and resistors will also lose their cases by boasting of citizenship status. Citizenship is another equity agreement that we have with the Crown. And this is the very juristic contract that Federal judges will use to incarcerate them. In the words of former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, ?Equity is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements.? The balance of Title 42, section 1981 of the Civil Rights Code states, ??.citizens shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind??

What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment instrumentality. It also should be borne in mind that even cursory circulation or commercial use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an attachment of liability for the payment of the Crown's debt to the FED. This is measured by your taxable income. And to facilitate future asset-stripping, the end of the 14th amendment includes a state of debt hypothecation of the United States, wherein all enfranchised persons (that's you) can be held personally liable for the Crown's debt.{Not Me}

The Crown views our participation in these contracts of commercial equity as being voluntary and that any gain accrued is taxable, as the gain wouldn?t have been possible were it not for the Crown. They view the system of interstate banks as their own property. Any profit or gain experienced by anyone with a bank account (or loan, mortgage or credit card) carries with it ? as an operation of law ? the identical same full force and effect as if the Crown had created the gain.
n's debt. Debt originated organically with naturalization I got debts no honest Man can pay with bills

What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment instrumentality. It also should be borne in mind that even cursory circulation or commercial use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an attachment of liability for the payment of the Crown's debt to the FED. This is measured by your taxable income.

In the Gospel of Pragmatism we find that Jesus was the bastard Son of Archelaus HEROD. Who adopts Him? The CHRISTIANS of course!

I think the most appropriate demarcation for how my neurology functions was this treatise about Gold Restrictions, where Canada went off the reservation at the time of "our" Civil War. Of course I am connecting Canada with New World France.

Those who realize what is happening and ask the court for the name of the true creditor or recipients of the fines imposed by the ‘legal system’ are always refused this information by the judge.

The true creditors in such cases, and the ultimate recipient of the fines, are the bankers to which the corporation ‘country’ is bankrupt.” or since being basterized and adopted by Uncle Sam a great debt is my inheritance .cursory circulation of that abandonment Birth Certificate. Printed on Bank Note Paper currency the cursory head count, Head Tax .It is a property of the Department of Commerce because a you is nothing more than a piece of commercial material.we are thereby a maritime product, a “shipped” commodity. Our mothers were delivering a product under maritime law and that’s why we are born in a “delivery room.”

That’s why the “doc” signs your “berth” certificate, your “certificate of manifest.” You’re kept in the Maternity “Ward.” Why a ward? No other hospital areas are called wards. Prisons have wards and wardens. wards of the United States

The United States Corporation came about just after the civil war. The Act of 1871 was passed by congress creating a separate form of government for DC, essentially turning it into a corporation.

It was decided that employees would be called “citizens.” So when you say in court or on paper, that you are a citizen of the United States, you are not a free American, but an employee of US Inc. IDENTIFICATION well thats the venue

I think maybe Xparte is making claim to the contiguity of linguistics.

All these terms are the Word in action. We are creating a world of crop circles out of various sacred geometries. But back on the mundane and profane for a moment.

I get the feeling in serving the Secretary General of the United Nations on Manhattan lately, that using Registered Mail is the secondary method to access the US Post Office. Primarily one would use the general delivery but that has grown so out of date with population.

Xparte brings to mind how the NOFTL statute in Title 26 is always claimed to be written for government employees. And in the same breath claimed for US citizens. When it was written around a fellow who was a government employee with an import business on the side. He claimed he was tax exempt because he was a government employee. So Congress wrote that statute clause for him. But it applies because any "citizen" is the beneficiary of government. Any employee is beneficiary of the company he provides goods and services to - his employer.

You might find ways to work through all these things linguistically. Each syllable breaks down to each letter. Stamina. The earliest treatise on physics might be the Sepher Yetzirah.

In the Gospel of Pragmatism we find that Jesus was the bastard Son of Archelaus HEROD. Who adopts Him? The CHRISTIANS of course!

I think the most appropriate demarcation for how my neurology functions was this treatise about Gold Restrictions, where Canada went off the reservation at the time of "our" Civil War. Of course I am connecting Canada with New World France.

I think that we find evasion and fraud in the lack of docketing a perfectly valid appeal. Stonewalling.

BRUNO says one thing; and equity presides rather than law. This preserves the public policy. BRUNO is like the "Interstate Clause" here. You have to be messing around across State borders to activate the FBI and so it is with the Crown. But the prosecution comes in the Name of the Crown illegally.

This is like the oaths of office. One might resort to billing and watch them taste their own poisoning. Biters with biters - that sort of thing.

When we read, Thou shall not take the Lord thy God’s name in vain, does that indicate we should know and understand vanity? Does this mean we should know and understand God’s name also?

Are the commandments threats –or- promises? Does a threat imply fear? Does a promise imply hope?

Did God promise us, we would NOT take his name in vain? –OR- Did God threaten us regarding his name?

How do you take God’s name? Is it like getting married and saying I do?
Is the church referred to as the Bride of Christ. Is there a parable of virgins waiting for the bridegroom? Are some of them referred to as Foolish? Had they taken Gods name? If not, Why were they waiting? Were some of them waiting in vain?

Is “God” a generic term? Is “governor” a generic title? Does governor apply to Kay Ivey of Alabama , George Wallace, Robert Bentley, Jim Folsom? Hey Governor! Which one?
Hey God!.....which one? .....The God of the first day.....-or..... The God of the seventh day....WHAT IS THEIR NAME?

Does the term “God” apply to others also? Why would Joshua say, “And Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor: and they served other gods. ?

Is it vanity to sit in the church pew, see the pastor and baptismal candidate stand in the baptistery, the pastor raise his arm and say, I baptize you in the name of the father, the son and the holy spirit, knowing neither the pastor nor the candidate know the Father’s name? Would it be appropriate for some one to ask, what is the father’s name? Whose name are you being baptized into? Who are you marrying? What is you husband’s name? Is the Father’s name generic? Is Governor a Generic term? Is God ....a name -or- a title? Is it generic? How effective is generic religion?

Is it lipstick on a pig to pray, our father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name, when you don’t know his name? How can you hallow something you don’t know? Where is the Sabbath School Quarterly that addressees this? Why have you never seen one? Do you know you never will? Do you know why you never will?

…..In vain do they worship me…..Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: