I haven't been alive long enough to know whether there's been a presidential candidate like Trump or not, but I know that you won't be able to find a similar-minded person in a couple of years b/c of the ongoing liberal pressure. People won't be able to say stuff like that without getting locked up if a certain Hillary Clinton comes to power. If you are a self-proclaimed WN then you have no reason not to vote for him. I've never seen such a surge of white pride, and I've never seen so much hate for one single person.

Someone mentioned a revolution or something. Okay, how realistic is that? Whites will "rise up" against the current state of things? How about no, especially not with the way the liberals are pressing down on America rn. Revolution is chaos and will most likely be channeled against us in the long-run. A revolution started by whites might end up with minorities, or actual communists, gaining power.

If Obango tries to circumvent the election, civil uprising is inevitable. And, with the needed popular support. This is not something to worry about! The more likely scenario is a Trump victory and the usual suspects becoming violent. Lesson time for leroy!

Here's the deal. Whitaker is going to be the freedom party candidate in the general election. Vote Trump in the Republican primary. If he wins do it again in the general election. If the cucks manage to screw him out of it, vote Whitaker in the general election. Get as many folks as you can to do the same.

Yes, you can have it both ways! Whitaker is the protest vote.

So... and what do you do withe the ,,protest vote''? Throw it in the garbage.
Of course you do.

Trump is a step in the right direction. He's nationalist, and unappologetic about it, and claims he wants to strengthen our borders and refine our immigration policy. Doing that while leaving the 2nd ammendment untouched AND promoting a single payer health care system sounds good to me. The way I see it, Trump as president could be: 1: true to his word and make good changes. 2: true to his word, but blocked by congress/senate but at least light a fire under their butts by telling the people that their representatives are hurting them and encourage change that way. 3: A liar who is not planning on doing what he says he will. Every other candidate is already promising to further degrade the country (while lying that what they will do would help) and/or promising to kick the can down the road on key issues, so for me Trump is the only choice. Any way you slice it, he is paving the way for future, more WN friendly candidates for various offices. If he gets shut out now, we might be losing the last great chance to get a decent guy in the white house, especially if you look at the plans for immigrants legal and illegal touted by many top candidates and imagine the demographic impact. Even someone less WN friendly than trump (and no, he isn't particulalrly WN friendly, but his vocal emphasis on objectivity and realism in a way opens the door to the truths promoted by WN) running after Hillary has her way with the white house . Just imagine: millions of recent immigrants being told "Candidate X is the next Trump! He must not succeed no matter the cost!" It could be disastrous.

A better poll would be "Do you think the Trump phenomenon is good for the white nationalist movement". Some of the "no's" on this poll were because people were going to vote for Bob Whitaker of the American Freedom Party - but they would have voted for Trump if Whitaker was not running. There are a few vocal anti-Trump people on stormfront, but I think almost everyone here agrees that Trump's candidacy is a net positive thing for us.
I always have thought that anti-Trumpers on stormfront fall into 3 categories
1. "worse is better" people that think Trump will placate whites momentarily with some fleeting pro-white policies that get reversed the second he steps down and is replaced with a Democrat president
2. The hard-core WN idealist - no one short of an anti-zionist and explicitly pro-white candidate is going to be good enough for such people - neglecting the reality that such a dream candidate at this point in time has zero percent chance of actually winning.
3. Trolls that want to turn WNs away from the only good (and viable) candidate for president since Pat Buchanan's attempts in the 90s.

The anti-Trumpers have been woefully unsuccessful in their attempts to get people to jump off the Trump train. Trump is so popular on stormfront these days that I wonder if the name of the site will be changed to Trumpfront.

Clearly Trumps are best choice not rocket science folks the rest are pro amnesty Trumps the only one who's not plus he got enough of his own money to not have to cower to the Jews the choice is very simple do you care enough about the future of America to vote Trump?

I have nothing against Bob Whitaker, but casting a vote for him is an absolute and total waste of a vote - without exceptions.

A vote for an explicitly pro-White candidate is a waste of a vote? It starts with us. If an explicitly pro-White candidate can't get votes from us then how can we blame fellow Whites from voting liberals and cuckservatives into power all these years? Especially if we are doing exactly the same as them.

Do you think Golden Dawn or Front National would have gotten any attention without pro-Whites starting the ball rolling and putting their votes behind explicitly pro-White candidates?

A vote for an explicitly pro-White candidate is a waste of a vote? It starts with us. If an explicitly pro-White candidate can't get votes from us then how can we blame fellow Whites from voting liberals and cuckservatives into power all these years? Especially if we are doing exactly the same as them.

Do you think Golden Dawn or Front National would have gotten any attention without pro-Whites starting the ball rolling and putting their votes behind explicitly pro-White candidates?

We should
1. Vote for Trump in the GOP primaries
2. Vote for Whitaker in the general election

This is called logic. The WN vote is so small it will not by itself make or break Trump in a general election. We can safely vote for Whitaker in the general election and not hurt Trump.

We should
1. Vote for Trump in the GOP primaries
2. Vote for Whitaker in the general election

This is called logic. The WN vote is so small it will not by itself make or break Trump in a general election. We can safely vote for Whitaker in the general election and not hurt Trump.

If you are in a swing state, you should vote for Trump just in case your vote matters. How many people think "My vote won't make any difference." and choose not to vote or to vote third-party? Enough to swing an election, most likely. Turnout is always the key, which is why Trump should do well. There is a lot more enthusiasm among Trump supporters than Romney ones last time around. That said, a few thousand quasi-WNs voting for Trump and getting family/friends to do the same could swing the vote in Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania, etc. If you live in a solidly partisan state like Vermont or Mississippi, then your general election vote really doesn't matter and you might as well vote Whitaker if it makes you feel better.

I will vote for Trump in both elections. Republicans struggle statewide in my state, but lower turnout among blacks in the big cities (without Obama, high black turnout is unlikely) combined with Trump's strong support from blue-collar whites might bring about an upset.