Who, Me? Cuomo Vetoes Lockbox Bill, Denies Raiding Transit

Hours after the MTA announced that it would be scaling back planned fare hikes in part because of better-than-expected tax receipts, Governor Cuomo vetoed two transparency bills designed to discourage Albany from siphoning away those very same dedicated transit funds. The governor capped his veto with a brazen denial: Despite getting caught raiding the MTA’s budget earlier this year, Cuomo insisted that he’s done no such thing.

To answer that question, let’s look at the recent history of transit raids. With New York state’s budget facing chronic shortfalls, Albany has diverted more than $260 million since 2009 from taxes that are supposed to be dedicated to funding transit, including multiple raids under Cuomo’s watch.

One of the bills Cuomo vetoed yesterday would have required the MTA to produce a report detailing the impacts of those post-2008 service cuts, measuring whether the projected cost savings actually materialized, and coming up with a plan to restore the lost service.

That bill overwhelmingly passed both the Assembly and Senate, but in his veto message Cuomo said the MTA has already performed an internal analysis of service cuts in line with federal guidelines and has announced $18 million in service enhancements this year. (By comparison, the systemwide cuts enacted in 2010 saved the authority $93 million.)

Though Cuomo criticized the first bill as re-litigating the past, the second, known as the transit lockbox bill, is focused squarely on preventing similar robberies in the future.

Only a constitutional amendment can force the governor’s hand in budget decisions, so the lockbox bill was designed as a transparency measure instead. If transit funds are raided, it would have required a statement from the governor’s budget office laying out how much is being diverted from transit and how it will hurt transit riders. By requiring the disclosure of impacts, advocates hoped that it would make the governor and state legislators less likely to propose budget raids in the first place.

A previous version of the lockbox bill passed in 2011, but it only protected the MTA, and Cuomo neutered the legislation before he signed it by stripping out the section requiring impact statements and adding a loophole that allows him to declare a fiscal emergency before proceeding with a budget raid. This year’s bill was expanded to protect all transit agencies in the state, added back the impact statement requirement, and removed the “emergency” loophole. A statewide coalition of labor, transit, good government and social justice groups lined up in support of the bill, which passed both the Senate and the Assembly unanimously.

This legislation is almost identical to a bill passed by the Legislature in 2011. However, the Legislature, at that time, agreed to amend that legislation to allow the Governor to transfer funds when the Governor declares a fiscal emergency, the Governor notifies the leaders of both houses, and a statute is enacted to authorize the transfer. This bill would repudiate that agreement. I have never declared a fiscal emergency and directed such transfers. The Legislature has not articulated a sound basis to change the current law. For these reasons, I disapprove this bill.

The governor focuses on the “fiscal emergency” loophole, which was added at his request in 2011. In his veto message, Cuomo says that he’s never taken advantage of that power: There have been no fiscal emergencies and no transfers under his watch, he says.

Moving funds from the MTA operating budget to cover expenses that would normally be covered the state’s general fund looks and sounds like a budget raid. But Assembly Member James Brennan, a sponsor of the lockbox bill, said the governor’s office had an explanation: Because the diverted money would cover debt service for MTA capital program bonds, it wasn’t subject to the “fiscal emergency” trigger. “There was a claim that it didn’t count,” Brennan said. I asked if he bought the argument, but Brennan wouldn’t say.

“[The governor’s] rewriting history with this veto memo,” said Nadine Lemmon of Tri-State Transportation Campaign. “He’s making his own definition. That’s why were were so upset about that [$20 million] diversion,” Lemmon said. Letting the governor ignore the few checks already in place against budget raids sets a bad precedent, she said, especially if pressure mounts to plug holes in Albany’s budget.

Lockbox bill supporters blasted Cuomo for the veto. “The lockbox bill offers a simple, easy way to increase fiscal transparency and accountability, and is consistent with Governor Cuomo’s stated goal of bringing an end to budget gimmicks and business as usual in Albany,” said John Kaehny of Reinvent Albany in an e-mail. “There’s simply no responsible excuse for raiding dedicated transit funds.”

“It seems like the Governor is the only one in Albany who thinks the lockbox bill is a bad idea. This legislation was not a heavy lift,” Transport Workers Union Local 100 President John Samuelsen said in a statement. “The veto is puzzling.”

State Senator Marty Golden sponsored the companion bill to Brennan’s legislation in the Assembly. His staff is still reviewing the governor’s veto message but hopes to try again on the issue in the future. “We’re disappointed with the veto,” Golden said in a statement. “The bill is a common-sense mechanism that ensures funds dedicated to transit stay with transit.”

Looking ahead, advocates are regrouping to figure out how to protect transit funds from budget raids, given the governor’s interest in quietly keeping his hand in straphangers’ pockets. “There’s huge support for this bill,” Lemmon said. “If anyone’s going to find a silver lining, it’s that we’ve built a good coalition, and hopefully it will get louder on transit issues — not just this one, but ones coming down the pike.”

“We’ll keep working and maybe someday he’ll see the light,” Brennan said.

Someday Cuomo’s ambition will undoubtedly bring him into the Democratic presidential primary. Or another Dem might consider him as VP pick. When that happens, transit advocates should not hesitate to tell primary voters who he really is: a thief and a liar who betrayed the people of New York, not only in the city, but in other areas served by MTA. I hope his aides are reading this. We will not forgive — and we will not forget.

If it was a unanimous vote, why would this be such a downer? Is it that the dems wouldn’t allow the veto override vote to happen?

Ben Kintisch

Cuomo is a car guy, and a short-sighted one at that. From this nonsense with the transit lock-box bill to the way he steamrolled through a mega-sized transit-less bridge, Cuomo is all about the private auto, and totally disdainful to transit riders.

chuck

Cuomo is a car guy and de Blasio is a motorist. Get the torches and pitchforks, the next four years are going to be brutal. C:

Emmily_Litella

And yet the loyal voters, advised to ‘vote for who you wish but vote’, will shuffle into the voting booth and re-elect him as the lesser of evils. Count down the days until he approves fracking too. And how about that 40 year old nuclear power plant on the Hudson they want to run for another 60 years with the guv’s permission?

red_greenlight1

Can we secede from NYS yet?

Larry Littlefield

While disappointing, remember that this is a Jim Brennan/Sheldon Silver side show, designed to shift responsibility for the financial disaster that is the MTA from 20 years of decisions by the New York State legislature.

The MTA Capital Plan expires in 14 months. Keep your eye on the ball.

JK

Albany practice is that the legislature rarely overrides vetoes. Too bad press coverage has glombed together the statewide transit Lockbox and MTA reporting bill. The Lockbox bill had about 10x the political support, including supportive Upstate editorials. Cuomo was smart to veto them together, it made them less than the sum of their parts and diluted the simple lockbox message: spend transit funds on transit. Also, the MTA bill was a quasi-MTA bash, whereas Lockbox focused clearly on future executive budgets.

No Comments?

Why does the line at the end of the piece say “No Comments” when there are nine comments? Seems like WordPress bug.

JoshNY

Is he the lesser? Against Paladino, sure; is there a sane Republican anywhere in NYS who could mount a plausible challenge? (I’m not holding my breath.)

Nathanael

If this passed unanimously, I think it’s time for the legislature to override the Lockbox veto. Upstate cities are ticked off because they routinely get raided too…

Nathanael

The question, given how corrupt our legislature is, is who is going to prevent the veto override. There are two possibliities.
(1) Sheldon Silver
(2) Dean Skelos

Both are fossils who should have been thrown out long ago. Either has the power to prevent the legislature from overriding the veto.

Nathanael

Yeah, but I think we’d have to start lobbying for that now. It might actually pass because I think Cuomo is starting to tick off the legislators.

Nathanael

Don’t forget that Cuomo betrayed the upstate cities too — the lockbox bill also prevented raids on their bus systems, which were also happening regularly.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Led by Assembly Member James Brennan, the State Assembly joined the Senate and took a strong stand in support of transit riders this afternoon, passing the transit lockbox bill by a unanimous vote of 98-0. Speaker Sheldon Silver came out in support of the legislation last night, putting it on a smooth path through the […]

With one month until a budget is due (admittedly not the strictest deadline in Albany), Andrew Cuomo and the state legislature have to close a deficit nearing $10 billion. Since Cuomo has ruled out any new taxes, he hasn’t left himself with many options. So there’s no doubt that further incursions on dedicated transit funds […]

With Governor Cuomo’s first executive budget set to be released, tomorrow is an important day for transit riders. We’ll find out whether the new governor will continue Albany’s practice of stealing dedicated transit funds to plug budget holes elsewhere, try again to reduce the state’s meager contribution to student MetroCards to nothing, or decide instead […]

If you thought Albany had gotten over the habit of raiding the MTA for cash, think again. Nadine Lemmon at the Tri-State Transportation Campaign reports that there’s a $20 million transit raid lurking in Governor Cuomo’s 2013 executive budget: This $20 million diversion of funds comes from a pot of money that is statutorily dedicated […]

This is rich. When Mayor Bill de Blasio told the Daily News he’s wary of upping the city’s contribution to the MTA capital program because Governor Andrew Cuomo has repeatedly raided dedicated transit funds, MTA Chair Tom Prendergast said don’t worry, you can trust the governor: “This is nothing more than rhetoric from a mayor who refuses to […]

A broad coalition of good government groups, transit and environmental advocates, and unions sent a letter to Andrew Cuomo on Friday [PDF] urging the incoming governor to protect straphangers by ensuring that transit revenues are spent on transit. In the last year, Albany raids have shortchanged the MTA of more than $160 million, deepening a […]