Exaggerated is a nice way of saying “Made up”. Yes, the house of cards is falling! The one thing the NWO did not count on is the Truthers
movement being clever enough to see through the veil of lies. Now that one guy has fallen on his side, see the rest of them run for cover.

Surely this will put a stop to the ridiculous carbon tax these clowns are planning?

Don’t ante into that semantics game at all! And also don’t be ashamed of being labeled a “Truther”. The term “Truthers” was essentially a
constructed pejorative used to dismiss anyone that questioned the “Warmers” dogma (I admit the hypocrisy here). It was clearly intended to be
used, as some have attempted, to use a dismissive label such as “Nazi”, "Communist", "hippie", “racist”, “homophobe”, etc. to dismiss
anything further you have to say. The application instantly rendered anything you had to say as pure lunacy.

Thus, by applying that label, you were instantly banished to the ranks of kooks. So, maybe by your definition, you are not a “Truther”. But
they would have gladly used that definition for you – and that was the point: make anyone that questions the Church of Global Warming a
heretic. Whether or not the questioning was justified is besides the point (see: Galileo, Bruno, et al).

In that sense, you should be proud to be labeled a “Truther”. Because at least you had the courage to speak out against the orthodoxy. And
furthermore, NEVER feel ashamed to get lumped in with those that ask questions! After all, Isn’t that why you’re here on ATS ?

Very interesting. I've been keeping up with the story as much as possible and have tried very hard to listen to both sides of the arguments. Some
made the findings appear very damning while other said they weren't anything major so I began to get a bit confused.

But if people are actually resigning, then this tells me there is indeed some veracity to the claims.

Originally posted by AshleyD
Very interesting. I've been keeping up with the story as much as possible and have tried very hard to listen to both sides of the arguments. Some
made the findings appear very damning while other said they weren't anything major so I began to get a bit confused.

But if people are actually resigning, then this tells me there is indeed some veracity to the claims.

It is very interesting. Im wondering what implications it will have on my organisations climatic research section. Obviously being the major
meteorological and climatic organisation, we wouldve had emails to and from the Brits.

Interesting Oz, so do you think this was kept among the Brits, or did they share their little secret with other countries?

I would love to hear your input, and even more, your conclusions based on your research when it is finished.

Basically, I have been saying for the last 2 years that the climate IS warming up, BUT this is part of a natural cycle (one only needs to study ice
core samples).

If we were around about 11,000 years ago, just before the end of the last ice age we would all be commenting on how warm things are getting now, and
boy it’s hot today! So hot in fact it melted the MASSIVE glaciers (up to 1Km thick) and ice sheets that once cover New York City!

All I know is that our data, like most the worlds climatic data, is available to the scientists that work there. I cant say what information or if any
of our guys were involved in it for sure, but we have been asked to not comment until our own internal investigation is concluded.

Personally though my belief is, the earth goes through natural longterm cooling and heating. Unfortunantly though, there is simply not enough
meteorological human observational data to prove weather or not climate change is a myth or not. Also, I dont think the full effects of the La Nina
and El Nino weather patterns have been taken into acount

For the record to, the global average temperature has actually been cooler for the past 2 years

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.