SFJ is the same way only with ST and pretending to be nice. How many people there who argue against the general consensus are taken seriously?
SFJ is the same shithole it its always been.
Mind play you clung to like a child holding a security blanket. When the majority of your adoring fans at SFJ weren't giving you the cheerleader routine you expected, your calc numbers went down until you got your cheerleader sqaud

Through technobabble apparently since that is your excuse for the DS weapon being technobabble
And just where in canon(non EU) is the MF stated to be 22.5m wide? Scaling is flawed
Based upon your unsourced size for the MF and unscourced assumption between the DS I and DS II this scaling is also flawed.
Where in canon pray tell is a rebel transport stated to be 90m long? Also where is your scaling showing the trench of an ISD is the same size as the trench on the Executor? More flawed scaling.
Your own quotes say the Empire is a million worlds. Source for number of Inhabited systems?
Yet you used EU sources for ships used in your flawed scalings.
Fusion of what?
Odd, I dont remeber them stating the size of the MF or a rebel transport in canon
As explained above you used EU sources for the sizes of your known objects on top of your unsourced assumptions as to various objects relations between each other, like how you declared the trench to be thrice the size of the docking vestibule, and the trenches on an ISD and SSD to be identical.
Yet you used the EU for the sizes of your known objects in your scaling
Where? The quotes on your page is subject to interpretation, and you have provided no canon evidence to support your interpretation
Hyperbole, also a no limit fallacy, and fusion of what? Sun Dragons? Also demonstrates the logical fallacies of division, and hasty generalization.
Again, hyperbole, and the logical fallacies of slippery slope, false dilemma, and false dichotomy
And what is the energy density of Sun Dragons?
Ha Ha hilarious. Some things are just better left unsaid.
So E=mc^2 is technobabble now? Yet another example of false dichotomy and the related logical fallacies.
You did in your scaling......idiot
Alas, his objections are entirely reasonable, since you used the EU in your scaling, and many of your assumptions are based off of logical fallacies