Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says his government is reviewing the courtâs decision and considering the next steps.

Protesters, pictured April 7, 2018, protesting the Trans Mountain pipeline in Burnaby, B.C. As the federal government decides how best to respond to the Federal Court of Appeal's Aug. 30 ruling to quash the order in council approving the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project, pipeline protesters have hailed the ruling as a victory. Photograph courtesy of Flickr

Share a storyThe story link will be added automatically.

From: To: Message:

As the Liberal government mulls its response to the Federal Court of Appealâs decision to overturn Ottawa's approval for the $7.4-billion Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project, experts and strategists warn of risks of taking it to the Supreme Court. âAppealing potentially could add more damage, because theyâre in a position where they donât want to add an extra narrative where things are tied up in the courts and that they are opposed to court decisions,â said Nik Nanos,

This is an exclusive subscriber-only story by The Hill Times. If youâd like to read the full article:

The first-of-its-kind challenge of two 2014 rulings by the House Board of Internal Economy will set important legal precedent when it comes to the application and scope of parliamentary privilege protections in Canada.

Finance Minister Bill Morneau will likely release his much-awaited plan to help Canadian businesses affected by U.S. tax cuts as part of the fall economic update, but there's plenty more that could come out of it.