Hi and thanks for visiting the best Ravens forum on the planet. You do not have to be a member to browse the various forums, but in order to post and interact with your purple brethren, you will have to **register**. It only takes a couple of minutes. You can also use your Facebook account to log in....just click on the blue 'FConnect' link at the very top of the page.

Re: Boldin

*Gasp!* Hoping they can work something out. In Ozzie I Trust; but man, losing Boldin would be a bitter pill to swallow.

"A lot" is a two word expression denoting a great deal or greatly, as in "I like sunshine a lot." "Alot" is a lovable imaginary grammar monster. You can love a lot; you can love an alot; you can love alots a lot; but they are not the same thing.

Re: Boldin

"A lot" is a two word expression denoting a great deal or greatly, as in "I like sunshine a lot." "Alot" is a lovable imaginary grammar monster. You can love a lot; you can love an alot; you can love alots a lot; but they are not the same thing.

Re: Boldin

Certainly an interesting development, though not totally out of the blue. Still, as they're so willing to go full brinksmanship, the Ravens must've calculated they're okay without him. If Ed doesn't return and Ayanbadejo is cut, then suddenly there are very few over 30s.

Makes you wonder what they're planning to do with Leach and Jacoby - is it just some space clearing or a vet purge of sorts.

Although Walsh's system of offense can compensate for lack of talent; however, defense is a different story. According to Walsh, talent on defense was essential and could not be compensated for. What did Walsh do in 1981? He acquired physical and talented players on defense.