After being demoted from a planet to a dwarf planet by the
International Astronomical Union (IAU) two years ago, the IAU has announced the
term "plutoid" will be given to Pluto and similar dwarf
planets. Members of the IAU argued amongst themselves for two years,
confused on how to classify dwarf stars like Pluto.

Only dwarfs orbiting further than Neptune can be classified as a plutoid, and
they must also circle the sun and be large enough to have their own
gravitational field. Pluto's permanent classification as a plutoid now
means Neptune is the outermost planet in Earth's solar system; one complete
orbit around the sun takes almost 165 years.

"Plutoids
are celestial bodies in orbit around the sun at a distance greater than
that of Neptune that have sufficient mass for their self-gravity to overcome
rigid body forces so that they assume a hydrostatic equilibrium
(near-spherical) shape, and that have not cleared the neighborhood around their
orbit," said the IAU.

Pluto and Eris remain the only plutoids at the moment, but astronomers expect
to find other small bodies that meet the qualifications to be a plutoid.

The controversy over Pluto's planet status has been strong for years, and the
IAU-created plutoid classification most likely will not end the debate.
In fact, it is unlikely the debate regarding Pluto's status and what it should
be classified as will never end, and defining it as a "plutoid" will
only add fuel to the fire.

Many astronomers remain angry that Pluto, considered a planet for around 70
years, could have its status demoted so easily by the IAU. Text book
publishers and teachers must now begin to teach students that Pluto lost its
planet status and is now a plutoid, along with describing the new
classification.

The IAU has been the sole organization responsible for classifying all
planetary bodies for more than a decade.

Comments

Threshold

Username

Password

remember me

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

You should become a reporter.Take part of a statement and take it out of context and you can have it mean whatever you want.

Read the rest of the sentence and think about it.

quote: that have sufficient mass for their self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that they assume a hydrostatic equilibrium (near-spherical) shape, and that have not cleared the neighborhood around their orbit

As round as your stomach might be, its not because its gravity has caused it to reach hydrostatic equilibrium. And most likely it certainly doesn't have its own orbit.