tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post2818013720708126168..comments2019-01-19T07:24:27.708+00:00Comments on The Lockerbie Case: Arguments for a Lockerbie inquiryRobert Blackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1073021351804532798.post-91790251672513849882018-06-01T11:35:37.750+01:002018-06-01T11:35:37.750+01:00The following comment is by James Robertson, who t...The following comment is by James Robertson, who tried unsuccessfully to post it himself earlier:<br />&#39;An excellent summary of why the case for a Scottish pubic inquiry into Lockerbie is unanswerable. All that has changed in the intervening years is that yet more evidence has emerged casting further doubt - some might say entirely demolishing - the safety of the conviction. We have also had Mr MacAskill himself explicitly refuting the key evidence upon which Mr Megrahi was convicted - that he was the purchaser of the clothes from Tony Gauci&#39;s shop - and arguing that &#39;what really happened&#39; is completely different from what the judges at Camp Zeist concluded had happened. And Police Scotland are just concluding a four-year investigation into allegations of criminality during the original investigation and trial, which is likely to bring even more doubts over the conviction to the attention of both the SCCRC and Crown Office. As the 30th anniversary of the disaster approaches, there is still time for the SNP Government to do the right thing.’Robert Blackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03606456028430261555noreply@blogger.com