CHAP. II.

OBSERVATIONS ON OTHER PARTS OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, CHIEFLY IN THE OLD TESTAMENT, THAT PROVE THE DOCTRINE OF ORIGINAL SIN.

Original depravity may well be argued, from wickedness being often spoken of in Scripture, as a thing belonging to the race of mankind, and as if it were a property of the species. So in Psal. xiv. 2, 3. “The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. They are all gone aside; they are altogether become filthy: there
is none that doeth good; no, not one.” The like
we have again, Psal. liii. 2, 3.—Dr. T. says (p. 104, 105), “The Holy Spirit does not mean this of every individual; because in the very same psalm, he speaks
of some that were righteous, ver. 5. God is in the generation of the righteous.” But how little is this observation to the purpose? For who ever supposed, that no unrighteous men were ever changed by
divine grace, and afterwards made righteous? The psalmist is
speaking of what men are as they are the children of men, born of the corrupt human race; and not as born of God, whereby they come to be the children of God, and of the generation of the righteous. The apostle Paul cites this place in Rom. iii. 10-12. to prove the universal corruption of mankind; but yet in the same chapter he supposes the same persons spoken of as wicked,
may become righteous, through the righteousness and grace of God.

Wickedness is spoken of in other places in the book of Psalms, as a thing that belongs to men, as of the human race, as sons of men. Thus, in Psal. iv. 2. “O ye sons of men, how long will ye turn my glory into shame? How long will ye love vanity?” &c. Psal. lvii. 4. “I lie among them that are set on fire, even the sons of men, whose teeth are spears and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword.”
Psal. lviii. 1, 2. “Do ye indeed speak righteousness, O congregation? Do ye judge uprightly, O ye sons of men? Yea, in heart ye work wickedness; ye weight out the violence of your hands in the earth.” Our author mentioning these places,
says (p. 105. note), “There was a strong party in Israel disaffected to David’s person and government, and sometimes he chooseth
to denote them by the sons or children of men.” But it would have been worth his while to have
inquired, Why the psalmist should choose to denote the worst men in Israel by this name? Why he should choose thus to disgrace mankind, as if the compellation of sons of men
most properly belonged to such as were of the vilest character, and as if all the sons of men, even every one of them, were
of such a character, and none of them did good; no, not one? Is it not strange, that the righteous should not be thought worthy
to be called sons of men, and ranked with that noble
race of beings, who are born into the world wholly right and innocent? It is a good, easy, and natural reason, why he chooseth
to call the wicked, sons of men, as a proper name for them, That by being of the sons of men, or of the corrupt, ruined race of mankind, they come by their
depravity. And the psalmist himself leads us to this very reason, Psal. lviii . “Do ye judge uprightly, O ye sons of men? yea, in heart ye work wickedness, ye weigh out the violence
of your hands. The wicked are estranged from the womb,“ &c. Of which I shall speak more by and by.

Agreeable to these places is Prov. xxi. 8.. “The way of man is froward and strange; but as for the pure, his work is right.” He that is perverse in his walk, is here called by the name of man, as distinguished from the pure:
188
which I think is absolutely unaccountable, if all mankind by nature are pure, and perfectly innocent, and all such as are froward and strange in their ways, therein depart from the
native purity of all mankind. The words naturally lead us to suppose the contrary; that depravity and perverseness properly
belong to mankind as they are naturally, and that a being made pure, is by an after-work, by which some are delivered from
native pollution, and distinguished from mankind in general: which is perfectly agreeable to the representation in Rev. xiv. 4. where we have an account of a number that were not defiled, but were pure, and followed the
Lamb; of whom it is said, “These were redeemed from among men.“

To these things agree Jer. xvii. 5, 9. In ver. 5. it is said, Cursed is he that trusteth in man.“ And in ver. 9. this reason is given, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?” What heart is this
so wicked and deceitful? Why, evidently the heart of him, who, it was said before, we must not trust;and that is man. It alters not the case as to the present argument, whether the deceitfulness of the heart here spoken of,
be its deceitfulness to the man himself, or to others. So Eccl. ix. 3 . “Madness is in the heart of the sons of men, while they live.” And those words of Christ to Peter, Matt. xvi. 23 , “Get thee behind me, Satan—for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.Signifying plainly, that to be carnal and vain, and opposite to what is spiritual and divine, is what properly belongs to
men in their present state. The same thing is supposed in that of the apostle, 1 Cor. iii. 3, “For ye are yet carnal. For whereas there is among you envying and strife, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?” And that in Hos. vi. 7. “But they, like men, have transgressed the covenant.” To these places may be
added Matt. vii. 11. “If ye being evil, know how to give good gifts.” Jam. iv. 5. “Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, the spirit that dwelleth in us, lusteth to envy?”—1 Pet. iv. 2. “That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the lusts of men, but to the will of God.”—Yet above all, that in Job xv. 16. “How much more abominable and filthy is man, who drinketh
iniquity like water?” Of which more presently.

Now what account can be given of these things, on Dr. T.’s scheme? How strange is it, that we should have such descriptions,
all over the Bible, of man, and the sons of men! Why should man be so continually spoken of as evil, carnal, perverse, deceitful,
and desperately wicked, if all men are by nature as perfectly innocent, and free from any propensity to evil, as Adam was
the first moment of his creation, all made right, as our author would have us understand
Eccl. vii. 29? Why, on the contrary, is it not said, at least as often, and with equal reason, that the heart of man is right and pure; that the way of man is innocent and holy; and that he who savours true virtue and wisdom, savours the things that be of men? Yea, and why might it not as well have been said, the Lord looked down from heaven on the sons of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and did seek after God;
and they were all right, altogether pure, there was none inclined to do wickedness, no, not one?

Of the like import with the texts mentioned are those which represent wickedness as what properly belongs to the WORLD; and
that they who are otherwise, are saved from the world, and called out of it. As John vii. 7, “The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth; because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.” John viii. 23. “Ye are of this world: I am not of this world.“
John xiv. 17. “The spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive; because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him.” John xv. 18, 19.“If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love its own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.” Rev. xiv. 3,
4. “These are they which were redeemed for the earth,—redeemed from among men.” John xvii. 9. “I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me.” John xvii. 14. “I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.“ 1 John iii. 13, “Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.” 1
John iv. 5. “They are of the world, therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.” 1 John. v. 19. “We are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.” It is evident, that in these places, by the world is meant the world of mankind; not the habitation,
by the inhabitants: for, it is the world spoken of as loving, hating, doing evil works, speaking, hearing, &c.

The same thing is shown, when wickedness is often spoken of as being man’s own, in contradistinction from virtue and holiness.
So men’s lusts are often called their own hearts’ lusts, and their practicing wickedness is called walking in their own ways,
walking in their own counsels, in the imagination of their own heart, and in the sight of their own eyes, according to their
own devices, &c. These things denote wickedness to be a quality belonging properly to the
character and nature of mankind in their present state: as, when Christ would represent that lying is remarkably the character
and the very nature of the devil in his present state, he expresses it thus, John viii. 44. “When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”

And that wickedness belongs to the very nature of men in their present state, may be argued from those places which speak of mankind as being wicked in their childhood, or from their childhood. So Prov. xxii. 15. “Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.” Nothing is more manifest,
than that the wise man in this book continually uses the word folly, or
foolishness, for wickedness; and that this is what he means in this place, the words themselves explain. For the rod of correction
is proper to drive away no other foolishness, but that which is of a moral nature. The word rendered bound, signifies (as observed in Pool’s Synopsis) a close and firm union. The same word is used in Prov. vi. 21. ”Bind them continually upon thine heart.” And Prov. vii. 3.“Bind them upon thy
fingers, write them upon the table of thine heart.”
279279 To the like purpose in Prov. iii. 3. and Deut. xi. 18. where this word is used.
The same verb is used, 1 Sam. xviii. 1, “The soul of Jonathan was knit, or bound, to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.”—But how comes wickedness to be so firmly bound, and strongly
fixed, in the hearts of children, if it be not there naturally? They have had no time firmly to fix habits of sin, by long
custom in actual wickedness, as those who have lived many years in the world.

Dr. T. says (p. 124, note), that he “conceives, from the youth, is a phrase signifying the greatness or long duration of a thing.” But if by long duration he means any thing else than what
is literally expressed, viz. from the beginning of life, he has no reason to conceive so, neither has what he offers so much as the shadow of a reason
for his conception. There is no appearance in the words of the two or three texts he mentions, of their meaning any
thing else than what is most literally signified. And it is certain, that what he suggests is not the ordinary import of
189
such a phrase among the Hebrews; but that thereby is meant from the beginning, or the early time of life, or existence; as may be seen in the places following, where the same word in the Hebrew is used, as in the eighth of Genesis. 1 Sam. xii. 2. “I am old and grey-headed—and I have walked
before you from my childhood unto this day.” Ps. lxxi. 5, 6.“Thou are my trust from my youth: by thee have I been holden up from the womb. Thou art he that took me out of my mother’s bowels.” Ps. lxxi. 17, 18. “O God, thou hast taught me from my youth; and hitherto have I declared thy wondrous works: now also, when I am old and grey-headed, forsake me not.” Ps. cxxix. 1, 2. “Many a time have they
afflicted me from my youth, may Israel now say: many a time have they afflicted me from my youth; yet have they not prevailed against me.” Isa. xlvii. 12. “Stand now with the multitude of thy sorceries, wherein thou hast laboured from thy youth“ (So also Isa. xlvii.15). 2 Sam. xix. 7. “That will be worse unto thee, than all the evil that befell thee from thy youth until now.” Jer. iii. 24,
25. “Shame hath devoured the labour of our fathers, from our youth.—We have sinned against the Lord our God from our youth, even to this day.”
281281 So Gen. xlvi. 34. Job xxxi.18. Jer. xxxii. 30. and Jer. xlviii. 11. Ezek. iv. 14. Zech. xiii.5.

And it is to be observed, that according to the manner of the Hebrew language, when it is said, such a thing has been from youth, or the first part of existence, the phrase is to be understood as including that first time of existence. So Josh. vi. 21 “They utterly destroyed all, from the young to the old,” (so in the Hebrew), i.e. including both. (So Gen. xix. 4. and Esther
iii.13.)

And as mankind are represented in Scripture, as being of a wicked heart from their youth, so in other places they are spoken of as being thus from the womb. Psal. lviii. 3. “The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.” It is observable, that the psalmist mentions this as what belongs
to the wicked, as the SONS OF MEN: for, these are the preceding words; “Do ye judge uprightly,
O ye sons of men? Yea, in heart ye work wickedness.”
282282 A phrase of the like import with that in Gen. viii. 21. The imagination, or, as it might have been rendered, the operation, of his heart is evil.
Then it follows, the wicked are estranged from the womb, &c. The next verse is, their poison is like the poison of a serpent . Serpents are poisonous as soon as they come into the world; they derive a poisonous nature by their generation. Dr. T. (p.
134, 135.) says, “It is evident that this is a scriptural figurative way of aggravating wickedness on the one hand, and of
signifying early and settled habits of virtue on the other, to speak of it as being from the
womb.“ And as a probable instance of the latter, he cites that in Isa. xlix. 1. “The Lord hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name.” But I apprehend, that
in order to seeing this to be either evident or probable, a man must have eyes peculiarly affected. I humbly conceive that such phrases as that in the 49th of Isaiah, of God’s calling the prophet from the
womb, are evidently not of the import which he supposes; but mean truly from the beginning of existence, and are manifestly of like signification
with that which is said of the prophet Jeremiah, Jer. i. 5. “Before I formed thee in the belly, I knew thee: before thou camest out of the womb, I sanctified thee, and ordained thee
a prophet unto the nations.” Which surely means something else besides a high degree of virtue: it plainly signifies that
he was,
from his first existence, set apart by God for a prophet. And it would be as unreasonable to understand it otherwise, as to
suppose the angel meant any other than that Samson was set apart to be a Nazarite from the beginning of his life, when he says to his mother, “Behold, thou shalt conceive and
bear a son: and now drink no wine, nor strong drink, &c. For the child shall be a Nazarite to God, from the womb, to the day of his death.”
283283Judges xiii. 5.
By these instances it is plain, that the phrase, from the womb, as the other, from the youth, as used in Scripture, properly signifies from the beginning of life.

Very remarkable is that place, Job xv. 14-16.“What is man, that he should be clean? And he that is born of a woman, that he should be righteous? Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight: how
much more abominable and filthy is man, which drinketh iniquity like water!” And no less remarkable is our author’s method
of managing it. The 16th verse expresses an exceeding degree of wickedness, in as
plain and emphatical terms, almost, as can be invented; every word representing this in the strongest manner: “How much more
abominable and filthy is man, that drinketh iniquity like water!” I cannot now recollect, where we have a sentence equal to
it in the whole Bible, for an emphatical, lively, and strong representation of great wickedness of heart. Any one of the words,
as such words are used in Scripture, would represent great wickedness: if it had been only said, “How much more abominable
is man! Or, how much more filthy is man! Or, man that drinketh iniquity.” But all these are accumulated with the addition
of—like water,—the further to represent the boldness or greediness of men in wickedness. Though iniquity be the most deadly poison, yet
men drink it as boldly as they drink water, are as familiar with it as with their common drink, and drink it with like greediness,
as he that is thirsty drinks water. That boldness and eagerness in persecuting the saints, by which the
great degree of the depravity of man’s heart often appears, as thus represented, Psal. xiv. 4. “Have the workers of iniquity no knowledge, who eat up my people as they eat bread?” And the greatest eagerness of thirst
is represented by thirsting as an animal thirsts after water, Psal. xlii.1.

Now let us see the soft, easy, light manner, in which Dr. T. treats this place. (p. 143), ”How much more abominable and filthy is man, in comparison of the divine purity, who drinketh iniquity like water! who is attended with so many sensual appetites, and
so apt to indulge them. You see the argument, man in his present weak and fleshly state, cannot be clean before God. Why so?
Because he is conceived and born in sin, by reason of Adam’s sin? No such
thing. But because, if the purest creatures are not pure, in comparison of God, much less a being subject to so many infirmities as a mortal man. Which is a demonstration to me, not only that Job and his friends did not intend to establish the doctrine we are now examining, but that they were wholly strangers to it.”
Thus he endeavors to reconcile this text with his doctrine of the perfect native innocence of mankind; in which we have a
notable specimen of his
demonstrations, as well as of that great impartiality and fairness in examining and expounding the Scripture, of which he so often makes a profession!

In this place we are not only told, how wicked man’s heart is, but also how men come by such wickedness; even by being of
the race of mankind, by ordinary genetion: What is man, that he should be clean? and he that is born of a woman, that he should be righteous? Our author (p. 141, 142.) represents man being born of a woman, as a periphrasis, to signify man; and that there is no design in the words to give a reason, why man is not clean and
righteous. But the case is most evidently otherwise, if we may interpret the book of Job by itself. It is most plain, that man’s being born of a woman is given as a reason of his not being clean; Job xiv. 4. “Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean?” Job is speaking there expressly of man’s being born of a woman, as appears in ver. 1. And here how plain is it, that this is
given as a reason of man’s not being clean! Concerning this Dr. T. says,
That this has no respect to any moral uncleanness, but only common frailty, &c. But how evidently is this also otherwise! when that uncleanness, which a man has by being born of a woman, is expressly explained
of unrighteousness, in the next chapter at the 14th verse, “What is man that he should be clean? and he that is born of a woman, that he should
be righteous?” Also in Job xxv. 4. “How then can man be justified with God? And how can he be clean that
is born of a woman?” It is a moral cleanness Bildad is speaking of, which a man needs in order to his being justified. His design is, to convince Job of his moral impurity, and from thence of God’s righteousness in his severe judgments upon him; and not of his natural frailty.

And, without doubt, David has respect to this way of derived wickedness of heart, when he says, Psal. li. 5. “Behold, I was shapen in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.”
190
It alters not the case, as to the argument we are upon, whether the word (yntmxy) conceive me, signifies to conceive, or to nurse; which latter, our author takes so much pains to prove: for, when he has done all, he speaks of it as a
just translation of the words to render them thus, I was born in iniquity, and in sin did my mother nurse me. (p. 135) If it is owned that man is born in sin, it is not worth the while to dispute, whether it is expressly asserted, that he is conceived in sin. But Dr. T. after his manner, insists, that such expressions, as being born in sin, being transgressors from the womb, and the like, are only phrases figuratively to denote aggravation, and a
high degree of wickedness. But the contrary has been already demonstrated, from many plain scripture instances. Nor is one
instance produced, in which there is any evidence that such a phrase is used in such a manner. A poetical sentence out of
Virgil’s AEneid, has here been produced, and made much of by some, as parallel with this, in what Dido says to AEneas, in these lines:

In which she tells AEneas, that not a goddess was his mother, nor Anchises his father; but that he had been brought forth by a horrid rocky mountain, and nursed at the dugs of tigers, to represent
the greatness of his cruelty to her. But how unlike and unparallel is this! Nothing could be more natural, than for a woman
overpowered with the passion of love, and distracted with raging jealousy and disappointment, thinking herself treated with
brutish
perfidy and cruelty, by a lover whose highest fame had been his being the son of a goddess, to aggravate his inhumanity and
hard-heartedness with this, that his behavior was not worthy the son of a goddess, nor becoming one whose father was an illustrious
prince: and that he acted more as if he had been brought forth by hard unrelenting rocks, and had sucked the dugs of tigers.
But what is there in the case of David parallel, or at all in like manner leading him to speak of himself as born in
sin, in any such figurative sense? He is not speaking himself, nor any one speaking to him, of any excellent and divine father
and mother, of whom he was born: nor is there any appearance of his aggravating his sin, by its being unworthy of his high
birth. There is nothing else visible in David’s case to lead him to take notice of his being born in sin, but only his having such experience of the continuance and power of indwelling sin, after so long a time, and so many and
great means to
engage him to holiness; which showed that sin was inbred, and in his very nature.

Dr. T. often objects to these and other texts, brought by divines to prove original sin, that there is no mention made in
them of Adam, nor of his sin. He cries out, Here is not the least mention, or intimation of Adam, or any ill effects of his sin upon us.—Here is not one word, nor the least hint of Adam, or any consequences of his sin, &c. &c.284284 Page 5, 64, 96, 97, 98, 102, 108, 112, 118, 120, 122, 127, 128, 136, 142, 143, 149, 152, 155, 229.
He says,
285285 142.
“If Job and his friends had known and believed the doctrine of a corrupt nature, derived from Adam’s sin only, they ought in reason
and truth to have given this as the true and only reason of the human imperfection and uncleanness they mention.” But these
objections and exclamations are made no less impertinently, than frequently. It is no more a proof, that corruption of nature did not come by Adam’s sin, because many times when it is mentioned, his sin is not
expressly mentioned as the cause of it; than that death did not come by Adam’s sin, as Dr. T. says it did. For though death, as incident to mankind, is mentioned so often in the
Old Testament, and by our Savior in his discourses, yet Adam’s sin is not once expressly mentioned, after the three first
chapters of Genesis, any where in all the Old Testament, or the four Evangelists, as the occasion of it.

What Christian has there ever been, that believed the moral corruption of human nature, who ever doubted that it came in the
way, of which the apostle speaks, when he says, ”By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin?” Nor indeed have they any more reason to doubt of it, than to doubt of the
whole history of our first parents, because Adam’s name is so rarely mentioned, on any occasion in Scripture, after that first
account of him, and Eve’s never
at all; and because we have no more any express mention of the particular manner, in which mankind were first brought into
being, either with respect to the creation of Adam or Eve. It is sufficient, that the abiding, most visible effects of these
things, remain in the view of mankind in all ages, and are often spoken of in Scripture; and that the particular manner of
their being introduced, is once plainly set forth in the beginning of the Bible, in that history which gives us an account
of
the origin of all things. And doubtless it was expected, by the great author of the Bible, that the account in the three first
chapters of Genesis should be taken as a plain account of the introduction of both natural and moral evil into the world.
The history of Adam’s sin, with its circumstances, God’s threatening, the sentence pronounced upon him after his transgression
and the immediate consequences, consisting in so vast an alteration in his state—and the state of the world, with respect
to all his posterity—most directly and sufficiently lead us to understand the rise of calamity, sin, and death, in this sinful,
miserable world.

It is fit we all should know, that it does not become us to tell the Most High, how often he shall particularly explain and
give the reason of any doctrine which he teaches, in order to our believing what he says. If he has at all given us evidence
that it is a doctrine agreeable to his mind, it becomes us to receive it with full credit and submission; and not sullenly
to reject it, because our notions and humours are not suited in the manner, and number of times, of
his particularly explaining it. How often is pardon of sins promised in the Old Testament to repenting and returning sinners!
How many hundred times is God’s special favour there promised to the sincerely righteous, without any express mention of these
benefits being through Christ! Would it therefore become us to say, that inasmuch as our dependence on Christ for these benefits
is a doctrine, which, if true, is of such importance, God ought expressly to have mentioned Christ’s merits as the
reason and ground of the benefits, if he knew they were the ground of them; and should have plainly declared it sooner, and
more frequently, if ever he expected we should believe him, when he did tell us of it? How oft is vengeance and misery threatened
in the Old Testament to the wicked, without any clear and express signification of any such thing intended, as that everlasting
fire, where there is wailing and gnashing of teeth, in another world, which Christ so often speaks of as the
punishment appointed for all the wicked! Would it now become a Christian, to object and say, that if God really meant any
such thing, he ought in reason and truth to have declared it plainly and fully; and not to have been so silent about a matter of such vast importance to all mankind,
for four thousand years together?