WikiLeaks: Conformists vs. Individualists

by Jacob G. Hornberger The WikiLeaks controversy is exposing one of the great divides among the American citizenry: the good, little citizen who has a reverential deference for government power and the independent, critical thinker who isn’t scared to expose and oppose government wrongdoing.

Those in the reverential, deferential category are shocked and outraged over WikiLeaks disclosure of U.S. government secrets to the American people and to the people of the world. They want the U.S. government to criminally prosecute the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, for treason, even if he is an Australian citizen. Others want him assassinated. No doubt there are some who would be willing to settle for a lifetime prison term without trial at Gitmo.

Where do these people acquire this reverential and deferential attitude toward the federal government?

The primary source is the state schooling system. The reason that the state in every country demands control over the education of a nation’s children is precisely to inculcate this sense of reverence and deference for the government. The idea is that if the state has power over a child for six or seven hours every day, 5 days a week, for 12 years, the state will have ample opportunity to mold and shape the child’s mind into one of conformity, obedience, respect for state authority, and unconditional trust in official pronouncements of the state.

The modern public school curriculum comes right out of the Prussian system. Gatto says the American educationists imported three major ideas from Prussia. The first was that the purpose of state schooling was not intellectual training but the conditioning of children “to obedience, subordination and collective life.” Second, whole ideas were broken into fragmented “subjects,” and school days were divided into fixed periods “so that self-motivation to learn would be muted by ceaseless interruptions.” Third, the state was posited as the true parent of the children.

Pointing to the importance of state schooling in Germany, Hitler told Germans who were resisting his regime that they were irrelevant given that the state had control over their children’s education. Hitler knew that after several years, the adults would be gone and the nation would be left with good, little citizens who deferred to the authority of the state and supported National Socialism.

Even in Nazi Germany, however, where the state carefully molded the mindsets of German children in public schools, there were young people who were able to break free of the indoctrination and the mind-molding. A good example was the students in the White Rose organization, such as Hans and Sophie Scholl, about whom I wrote an article many years ago entitled “The White Rose: A Lesson in Dissent.”

If you haven’t seen the movie “Sophie Scholl: The Final Days” I highly recommend it. It is great! A fascinating part of the movie is when the chief judge of Hitler’s People’s Court, a court created by Hitler to try terrorists, dissidents, traitors, and government critics — berated the Scholl siblings. When you see the movie, watch for the similarities between the pro-state mindset of Judge Freisler and that of the statists who are today berating Assange for his lack of respect for government authority.

Of course, here in the United States, there are people who somehow have broken free of the conformist mindset that the state desires in all its citizens. Most of them are libertarians but there are also a few liberals, such as Glenn Greenwald.

There are also young people within the state schooling system who resist the regimentation, the conformity, the group-think, and the reverence for the state that is inculcated within the students. Needless to say, those are the students who are diagnosed as psychologically handicapped and put on such drugs as Ritalin or Adderall, with the intent of softening their minds so that the state can overcome their resistance and make them part of the group.

It is the independent, critical thinkers, not the “My government, my god” crowd that historically has propelled mankind forward, especially in terms of liberty and mental and psychological development. Consider, for example, Henry David Thoreau, one of the greatest individualists of all time, who continues to inspire people of all ages today. Of course, if he were living today, the conformist crowd would undoubtedly be castigating and berating him, just like they’re doing to Assange.
___
Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.

One thing I have explained to my children: Being a thoughtless non-conformist is simply being a conformist of another type.

The state doesn't just want you to conform, they want you to conform by habit and without thought.

I conform, in many ways, that is just good practice, however, when I don't conform I don't do it to be obstinate or to cause trouble, no, no! I do it because its the right thing to do, in my opinion, and I have thought about it. Most people that are non-conformists just do it. They don't know why. They are as bad, or maybe even worse, than the conformists. They are simply the other side of the coin.

Think about conforming as just another choice. It may, in fact, be the best choice. There may be a reason most people hold their breath under water!!! But, in most things, don't be afraid to experiment a little. Being an ignorant non-conformist is worse than being a conformist. People hate you for not reason.

For example, I know I have to enter the verification code below if I want this comment published. I will choose to be a conformist and I will type in the leters and numbers. What the state wants from you is to just type it in and always type it in without questioning. I will, at this time, conform because I choose to conform. The state wants to brainwash you into believing you do not have a choice. YOU DO! Make it, even it its the one the state prefers, just make *A* choice.

You said "Of course, here in the United States, there are people who somehow have broken free of the conformist mindset that the state desires in all its citizens. Most of them are libertarians but there are also a few liberals, such as Glenn Greenwald."

You left out the small, scattered group of individuals who have COMPLETELY broken out of this world's wicked system and it's conformest, media downloaded, mindset: True Bible believing followers of Jesus Christ! (Not those who belong to 501c3 state yoked denominated "churches" but those who have come out of that false religious system).

"And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind (i.e. undoing the brainwash), that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God." Romans 12:2 (Anything less than following that command and following Christ Jesus is STILL serving in the enemies' camp, irregardless of what you want to call it.)

everyone thinks they are doing their own thinking. a major part of the brainwash program is that you must deny that you've been brainwashed! but i can't speak for them, i can only speak for myself. i went to public schools, and state university. i went to church. i watched television, went to the movies, read books and newspapers, etc. i lived in this society along with all them other folks, and my mind is my own. maybe there really aren't any of those weak-minded conformists the schools and media wants us to think we are. maybe the program doesn't work, or we'd already have that one world government nobody wants.

i would venture to disagree with nearly everything in this article, just because that's how i am. libertarians are certainly just as grouped up (conformity seems to me an euphemism for "groupthink") as any of the rest. liberals are just as closed minded as conservatives, only they are in denial of that. but i don't really believe people actually allow the group to define who they are, i think they are just too afraid to admit they don't. it is through fear that the people are ruled and are not free.

to group up free-thinkers and place them in opposition to brainwashed zombies is to create yet another false division, to divide us up and set us to fighting each other, so we can't see our way clear of the very serious situation we find ourselves to be in. i'm not with that. please don't include me in your new group of non-grouped-up people. doublethink, anyone?

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.