On 12/15/05, Simon Marlow <simonmar at microsoft.com> wrote:
> On 15 December 2005 13:17, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
>> > Anyway, the main gist of my original post was that TArrays should be
> > in the libraries, so that I can safely use it without having to send
> > along my own implementation each time (and potentially colliding with
> > someone else's implementation down the line). When/if a primitve
> > TArray is implemented, the Array-of-Tvars-approach could just be
> > replaced, and all programs which use the TArray would get an automatic
> > speed-boost.
>> I like it when someone asks for something we've already done :-)
>>http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/cvs-libraries/2005-December/004731.htm> l
Sweet! Thanks!
/S
--
Sebastian Sylvan
+46(0)736-818655
UIN: 44640862