WE'VE MOVED!

As part of our big, new redesign of the Alliance for Justice website, theJustice Watchblog has moved. To be sure you're getting all the latest news about the fight for a fairer America, visit us atwww.afj.org/blog

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Too many cases and too few judges leave courts in crisis

Federal Judgeships Act seeks relief for overburdened courts
but Republicans keep record of obstruction intact, throwing up roadblocks to
reform

At a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on
Bankruptcy and the Courts on the Federal Judgeship Act of 2013 today, Senator
Jeff Sessions (R-AL) made clear that Senate Republicans intend not only to both
have their cake and eat it, but to then throw the cake at Democrats who are
working to give federal courts the resources necessary to administer justice in
a fair and efficient way for all Americans.

The Federal Judgeships Act, introduced by Senators Chris
Coons (D-DE) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT), would create 91 new federal judgeships
to address a burgeoning caseload that’s been growing since the last time
Congress passed a comprehensive judges bill in 1990. The bill is based on the specific requests of
the nonpartisan Judicial Conference, which is headed by Chief Justice John
Roberts.

Alliance for Justice supports this
bill because, as Senator Coons said today, “Overburdened judges, almost by
definition, cannot provide the level of time, and care, and reflection they
would like to for each case before them.”

In opposing the legislation, Senator Sessions remarked that
the President has not named nominees for 50 of the 92 current vacancies on thefederal bench and
suggested that the need for more judges would be solved if the White House
simply filled existing seats. But here’s
what Sessions left out: Of the 50 current vacancies without nominees, 25 are in
states with two Republican Senators and 16 are in states with one Republican
Senator, while states with two Democratic Senators only have 8. That means that a whopping 82% of current judicial vacancies without a nominee are in states with at least one Republican
Senator.

This disparity is no coincidence.As AFJ has consistently noted, President Obama knows that nominees who
lack support from both of their home
state senators have no chance of moving through the Senate Judiciary Committee,
and therefore any pre- or post-nomination objection or opposition from a home
Senator renders a nomination futile. The
Republicans have relied on this sort of backdoor obstructionism—using home
state opposition to well-qualified and eminently capable candidates—to block
the President’s attempt to fill critical vacancies, and are now cynically
turning around and using these vacancies to oppose timely and important
legislation.This painfully obvious attempt to have it both ways cannot
go unnoticed, and Republican Senators should be held accountable for unduly limiting
access to the federal justice system.