Comments on: No real AI progress https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/
Liberty in an unfree world
Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:07:44 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.1
By: Cavalier https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/#comment-1543307
Sun, 26 Feb 2017 02:47:05 +0000http://blog.jim.com/?p=4056#comment-1543307Quantum consciousness down to the molecular level.
]]>
By: jim https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/#comment-1543266
Sun, 26 Feb 2017 00:56:24 +0000http://blog.jim.com/?p=4056#comment-1543266What is interesting is that they can learn stuff by watching other bees, which requires them to imagine themselves as that other bee, to have a theory of mind, to have empathy.

The common ancestor of bees and men, the urbilatarian, is also the common ancestor of lobsters and men, and lobsters and men use the same neurohormones to regulate and respond to social status, so the common ancestor of men and bees had social status interactions, which makes it likely he was aware that other beings like himself existed.

]]>
By: Cloudswrest https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/#comment-1543206
Sat, 25 Feb 2017 21:56:46 +0000http://blog.jim.com/?p=4056#comment-1543206It’s looking like even bees can be trained to do stuff, just like dogs.

]]>
By: jim https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/#comment-1386343
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:58:01 +0000http://blog.jim.com/?p=4056#comment-1386343There are no theoretical limits because there is no theory. We not only do not understand how consciousness works, but what it does, and why it is so remarkably useful and effective.
]]>
By: Anon https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/#comment-1386334
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 00:28:41 +0000http://blog.jim.com/?p=4056#comment-1386334We are making progress with neural networks, they designed to work in a similar fashion to synapses, where each node acts a certain way based on what kind and how much input is given. The complexity comes from organising them in a way that can make decisions. More intelligent and self-made decisions arise from neural networks. We’re a long way from consciousness but there are no theoretical limits.
]]>
By: Dude https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/#comment-1151275
Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:18:12 +0000http://blog.jim.com/?p=4056#comment-1151275Hot from Reddit: What an autonomous Tesla Car sees while driving

]]>
By: Sam https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/#comment-510203
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:08:07 +0000http://blog.jim.com/?p=4056#comment-510203By a super quick read. “…One important feature of dendrites, endowed by their active voltage gated conductances, is their ability to send action potentials back into the dendritic arbor. Known as backpropagating action potentials, these signals depolarize the dendritic arbor and provide a crucial component toward synapse modulation and long-term potentiation…”

The calculations you’ve been using are multiplications. Wouldn’t it instead be binary factorial? For example if you have two inputs in it’s not (1 x 2) it’s all possible binary combinations. Binary11 which is four possible combinations. Higher factorial combinations are possible with analog potentation. For example what if they were hexadecimal? Highest combination is #FF which is (15?×?16^1) + (15?×?16*0) = 256 possible combinations (counting zero as a combination). The numbers get real high, real fast. Even possible the dendrite spines act similar making the numbers astronomical very fast. Even if the dendrite spines or dendrites act as groups I believe there is a mechanism more complicated than adding which would again mean we would have to use a factorial to properly describe them.

]]>
By: Stephen W https://blog.jim.com/economics/no-real-ai-progress/#comment-507458
Fri, 07 Feb 2014 04:45:00 +0000http://blog.jim.com/?p=4056#comment-507458Here is and example of petty bureaucrats trying to thwart innovation for nonsensical reasons. Even when its not covered by there remit.