A friend of mine recently returned to the UK, from a fishing holiday in Vancouver and told me of an event he witnessed at a Gas-Station.

He was waiting while another customer - a lady with "tanned" skin, filled in a form for the fuel she had just purchased, then asked for a carton of cigarettes, then filled in a form for the cigarettes.
The lady paid and left.

My friend asked what he had to put on the form and was told that it only applied to tax-exempt "first citizens" or "native Americans" - and that the gasoline and cigarettes were tax-free for these original inhabitants.

Can you give me further information regarding this arrangement?

I am a native European, and would like to lobby to establish similar tax -exemption for my people (first -citizens) here in the UK.

They are not the first citizens. You can't be a citizen of a state that hasn't been set up yet, and before Europeans arrived in North America, the Canadian State hadn't even been thought of. The English and the French - probably the French of New France - were the first citizens. The Indians just get money and services from a state they could never have built themselves. Truly speaking, they are subjects, not citizens.

...
My friend asked what he had to put on the form and was told that it only applied to tax-exempt "first citizens" or "native Americans" - and that the gasoline and cigarettes were tax-free for these original inhabitants.

Can you give me further information regarding this arrangement?

I am a native European, and would like to lobby to establish similar tax -exemption for my people (first -citizens) here in the UK.

This would also be of great interest to other UK Stormfront users.

Thank you.

This is wrong on so many levels.

In theory, Indians were exempted from property tax when treaties were signed with them during the 1700's and 1800's. At the time, taxation to the King was based on property, not income. Since Indians didn't have a currency, so there was no tax. This has been misinterpreted by the courts to include income tax and services tax as well. The two latter taxes occurred after most treaties were signed, the first to pay for World War 1 and the second to pay for government waste.

Legally, Indians should pay these taxes. Especially, since they receive massive benefits from those taxes. Conversely, in theory, Indians are exempt from all services provided by taxation. Currently, we spend about $250,000 a year for each Indian family. Each Canadian family pays about $4,000 as a white head tax to Indians. (Most of that is wasted on assorted thugs and bureaucrats) We spend about $10,000 a year on each white family. It’s like saying, hey immigrants, we were here first, pay us money.

As a side note, Indians are not the original inhabitants of the Americas. According to oral legend, the original inhabitants were not Indians. A typical example in Virginia, the Kanawha River was "occupied by a fierce race of white warriors who successfully resisted the approach of the "red man" for a long time, but had finally succumbed and passed away in death." and that the Indians "found these relics (and ruins) old when they first entered; and that their origin was beyond their records" [Peters and Carden; History of Fayette County, West Virginia.]

__________________

“It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. (For treason)” [Gilbert Chesterton]

I agree with your feelings about this, it does seem unjust.
Please could you tell me - which taxes are these people immune from and how did they obtain this immunity?
Did they campaign for this or was it a "gesture" to buy their votes by some liberal politician?
We had heard that they operate casinos and brothels in the USA, but I had no idea that they were immune to gasoline tax!

Indians nationalists would argue they are exempt from all taxes, but hypocritically demand all services from those same taxes that others pay.

Liberal courts support this belief. I would argue the treaties were designed to protect the Aboriginal cultures. Therefore they should have no benefits from taxation. Unless they pay for it.

Treaties for example, say a tribe is entitled to a medicine bag. Courts have interpreted this to mean full medicare and dental coverage. Which is nonsense. Giving different races different rights is grotesquely racist.

One problem is how Indian do you have to be, in order to be Indian. Liberals argue that if you have one drop of Indian blood you are Indian. So a blond, blue eyed 1/64 Indian is legally an Indian.

Legal Indians get free medicare, free education, free dental, free housing, free lawyers, full services, tax exemptions and compensation of about $250,000 per year per family. If you factor equivalent income, Indians make about $500,000 a year per family. And yet most live close to 3rd world conditions because of corruption by band chiefs.

Ummmm, "we" gave them the name Indians, mistakenly thinking we were in India.

The word "Native" is a latin derivitave meaning to be born. So, I am a proud native. Blue eyed, of European heritage and pretty white native of Canada.

Alternately, if I am not an immigrant, and not a native, what am I?

As a white Canadian, you are indeed a true native of Canada, but I would be careful of advancing the argument that anyone born in Canada is a native of Canada - a Chinese born in Canada is - AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED - a Chinese native and will never be anything else.