The integration of natural science and spirituality is accomplished by putting consciousness into the equations of the quantized relativistic model of reality. This approach, with a quantum calculus based on the precise empirical data provided by the Large Hadron Collider, leads to the discovery of gimmel, the non-physical third form that must exist in addition to mass and energy, in order for there to be a stable universe.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Consciousness and the Nature of Reality

In order not to lose sight of the objective of science while looking at
the details of mathematical models (not seeing the forest for the trees) we have to keep in mind what
it is that we are doing, and keep asking ourselves what it is we are looking
for. In general, I believe, we are looking for the answer to the question “What
is the nature of reality?”

In my search for the answers to that
question, I started with the conviction that matter, energy, space, time, and
consciousness are inseparably linked as finite aspects
of one infinite thing: that we call reality; and that what makes them seem separate is the
conscious drawing of distinctions. Any detailed study of the physical vehicle
of human consciousness leads to the conclusion that what we take for reality is
not reality at all, but simply a representation made up of images constructed
in the brain. Of course, there actually is an existential reality, but, what is
it and how can we know it? The polymath Leibnitz and others have opined that the most
pertinent question is: “Why is there something rather than nothing?” And,
indeed, if the second law of thermodynamics was in operation from the beginning,
there should be no universe at all. If a big bang happened, it should have expanded and radiated to
infinity, returning within nanoseconds to maximum entropy. My answer to the question “why is there
something rather than nothing?” is Consciousness. My hypothesis is: none of the
six forms of reality (matter, energy and individualized consciousness, space,
time and primary consciousness) exists without the others. Reality, including
the physical universe, exists solely because of the action of consciousness,
drawing distinctions and organizing those distinctions into logical patterns.

It is on the basis of this hypothesis that I set out to put
consciousness into the equations of science in order to discover how consciousness shapes
the form of reality, creating and maintaining something instead of nothing. So
what we are looking for is evidence revealing how consciousness insures the
formation of stable structures in the physical universe that can support life. In looking for this evidence, we are investigating the very
edge of science: the interaction of mind and matter, the place where the
logical patterns of Primary Consciousness become finite patterns of energy. The
Conveyance Equation, Σni=1 (Xn)m = Zm, is the mathematical
expression of this process. The restriction of its quantifiers to integers reflects
the quantization of finite distinctions of matter and energy. Its simplest
expression in one dimension gives us the basis of arithmetic and algebra. The
Pythagorean Theorem is its expression in two dimensions and its integral form
in three dimensions and beyond is governed by Fermat’s Last Theorem. The TRUE
unit unifies matter, energy, space, time and consciousness at the sub-quantal
level of the most basic building blocks that make up quarks. In this context,
the ratios of matter/energy units to consciousness units for atoms and
molecules are significant, indicating the extent to which consciousness is
involved. The fact that Hydrogen has the highest ratio of all (0.7000) is significant,
and the fact that Carbon, Oxygen, Nitrogen and Phosphorus, the other elements
that make up the DNA molecule, all have the same ratio (0.3488) is also
significant. This is a reflection of the fact that they all have the same
number of electrons, protons and neutrons, as you point out, but these atoms
are stable structures only because of the operation of consciousness
through the Conveyance Equation. Without this symmetry imposed by the logical
structure of consciousness, they would decay rapidly.

It may be that all
of the naturally stable elements are necessary for life, and this may make the specific
ratios of life–supporting elements and molecules seem unimportant, but I think
this is again missing seeing the forest by focusing on the trees. The C to m/E ratios for Adenine,
Thymine, Guanine and Cytosine the molecules that, linked together by sugars and
phosphates, are the building blocks of DNA, are around 0.4587 for to 0.4837,
significantly higher than the ratios for any single element except Hydrogen. I
believe this is significant. These numbers are all dependent on the integer solution
of the Conveyance Equation I used. Assuming parsimony in nature, I used the simplest
(smallest integers) solution that would not result in negative total TRUE
units. There are other solutions that might be interesting for further
research, to apply to see if the resulting ratios are different.