Tag Archives: racism

Real racism is when MSNBC edits out a black protestor to make the rest look racist. That is such a great example of what we see with Obama & Co. They use race to divide people and advance their agenda. That’s racism.

Obama’s health care plan will be written by a committee whose head says he doesn’t understand it, passed by a Congress that hasn’t read it and whose members will be exempt from it, signed by a president who smokes, funded by a treasury chief who did not pay his taxes, overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that is broke.

What could possibly go wrong?

—

The Obama health care plan marches on with its false dichotomy: Pass this plan or we can’t improve health care. What a transparent falsehood. Sarah Palin points out the need for tort reform. I don’t recall seeing that one in the Obama plan. (Oh, and if you don’t like Palin, I don’t care. Remember who elected Obama.) Or consider some of the solid ideas offered by Steve Forbes. There are many things that can and should be done short of handing over that much more of the economy to the Federal government. What folly.

Gayle had a great piece on racism with this video of Morgan Freeman, which I heartily 2nd.

I keep waiting for the Liberals to fulfill MLK’s dream — that is, judging people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Conservatives, by and large, did so a long time ago.

I don’t care about the color of Obama’s skin (though I care about how thin it is). I just think he has awful policies that are doing great harm to this country.

Liberals tend to use the word racist just like they do homophobe, as a ridiculous pejorative designed to demonize their opponents and to shut off legitimate conversations. You often see it when they are getting crushed by facts and logic in a debate.

Rather than the gentle, soft-spoken idealist portrayed by Sean Penn, the real Harvey Milk was a short-tempered demagogue who cynically invented stories of victimhood to advance his political career.

In the upside-down world of San Francisco politics, Milk curried favor with voters by boasting that his homosexuality had resulted in a dishonorable discharge from the Navy in the dark ages before the sexual revolution. But far from the in-your-face, ponytailed “Mayor of Castro Street” of the 1970s, Chief Petty Officer Milk of the 1950s was a closeted homosexual whose discharge papers reflected four years of honorable service.

What the film and legislation insinuate—in an effort to depict Milk as a martyr for the gay rights movement on par with Martin Luther King’s martyrdom for the Civil Rights movement—is that homophobia killed Harvey Milk on November 27, 1978.

But Harvey Milk’s homosexuality played about as much of a role in his murder as San Francisco mayor George Moscone’s heterosexuality played in his.

Read the link for Milk’s defenses of Jim Jones and how Milk helped send a 6 yr. old to his death.

The level of influence of a significant other in a non-platonic relationship greatly impacts your ability to achieve the vocational task that the Lord has set for you. My recommendation is to avoid engaging in any romantic relationship in which self-sacrificial service to the Lord is not the main focus. And remember, physical contact greatly reduces your ability to make objective evaluations.

Today, Christians treat the Christian life as a hobby that we engage in for our benefit. And this includes romantic relationships. One way of screening prospective mates is by assessing how well prepared they are to defend the Lord’s reputation, when it is called into question. An authentic Christian should care enough to have prepared to defend God’s existence and character in public.

Fighting for the Faith has a good analysis of the false teachings of Chuck Currie. The host plays the whole audio of Chuck’s “sermon” with comments interspersed, so you know you are getting the full context.

Side note: Chuck still hasn’t backed up his accusations that I left comments on his blog that were “racist, sexist, homophobic” and included “offensive language and more.” I was curious to see if he would ever provide evidence or apologize, but all he said on his blog was, “Neil, Thanks for all your e-mails on this. I’m sorry that I don’t have the time to write back each day in person but thanks for your feedback.”

False teacher. False accusations. Shocking. Maybe this week’s sermon will be on honesty. Or asking forgiveness when you lie about someone. No, it will probably be about why Jesus is pro-legalized partial birth abortion, anti-parental notification, anti-informed consent, etc. (Yes, Chuck, some religious groups do support the choice to destroy the unborn — false and apostate religious groups, including segments of the Methodist Church.)

And, in keeping with the Times’ journalistic malpractice, quite a few things are misrepresented in favor of the unions. Take “card check” for instance. Check out how the Times describes the fact that this horrible law will take away one of the oldest democratic rights there is.

“Labor’s No. 1 priority is a piece of legislation called the Employee Free Choice Act, also known as the card-check bill. The bill would give workers the right to join a union as soon as a majority of employees at a workplace signed cards saying they wanted one. Business groups have attacked the legislation because it would take away employers’ right to insist on holding a secret-ballot election to determine whether workers favored unionization.”

—

Once again, liberals think abortion is moral but displaying pictures of it is immoral. I think that pictures of the Holocaust are unpleasant, but I am quite certain that the killings were immoral and showing the pictures is not immoral.

—

Lots of racism from some GLBTQ folks – the violent and viscious reactions continue from their Proposition 8 loss. I would expect black folks to be irritated that the gay lobby is trying to co-opt the Civil Rights agenda. Do the GLBTQ folks think it is a winning strategy to alienate blacks and say how uneducated they are for voting Yes on 8?

And even if pro-Prop 8 voters have less eduction than average, please remember that intelligence and wisdom are two different things. You don’t need a PhD to know the definition of marriage. I’m also reminded of this quote by J. Budziszewski:

Though it always comes as a surprise to intellectuals, there are some forms of stupidity that you must be highly intelligent and educated to commit.

Crazy lefties attack old lady at No on 8 protest. The only amusing thing in this horrible incident was when the hopelessly PC anchorman said, “a lot of hate evidently on both sides.” Uh, sure, buddy. The quiet old lady carrying the cross was really dishing out the hate to that mob.

Hat tip to Kris for the cartoon below. I had no idea that 1% in a margin of victory made such a big difference! I do find the “we need to unite behind the President” theme a little ironic, because the reality is that we don’t need to do that any more than the Democrats did when Bush was President.

This site is a little racy, but makes a great point about the messages from 52 to 48 blather going around. This is the sanitized version: Starting prior to the 2001 inauguration, you and your bought and paid for media demonized President Bush and conservatives over anything and everything, and now you want to play nice and demand unity? Give me a break. We won’t be vile like the Left has been, but we will complain now and keep complaining all we like. Will I pray for our leaders? Yes, because I’m commanded to. But my prayers will include requests that their dreams be haunted by visions of the slaughter of the unborn, the shattered lives of those who have abortions and the last breaths of those born alive but left to die.

P.S. Does this mean California is united against government recognition of oxymoronic same-sex marriage? I recall that the margin was quite similar.

Planned Parenthood accepted donations from people who specifically wanted to eliminate black babies. Of course, the media give them a pass, but you gotta appreciate the consistency of Planned Parenthood (their founder, Margaret Sanger, was a eugenicist – read the link for more).

Ohio representative: Lisa Hutton, administrative assistant

Ohio donor: There’s definitely way too many Black people in Ohio, so I am just trying to do my part.

Ohio donor: OK. Great, thank you.Idaho representative: Autumn Kersey, director of developmentIdaho donor: The abortion—I can give money specifically fror a black baby, that would be the purpose?PP Rep: Absolutely. If you wanted to designate that your gift be used to help an African-American woman in need, then we would certainly make sure that the gift was earmarked for that purpose.

Idaho donor: Great, because I really faced trouble with affirmative action, and I don’t want my kids to be disadvantaged against black kids. I just had a baby; I want to put it in his name.

PP Rep: Yes, absolutely.Idaho donor: And we don’t, you know we just think, the less black kids out there the better.PP Rep: Understandable, understandable.Idaho donor: Right. I want to protect my son, so he can get into college.

PP Rep: Alright. Excuse my hesitation, this is the first time I’ve had a donor call and make this kind of request, so I’m excited, and want to make sure I don’t leave anything out.