Let's examine the amount of donations the IHR/Mark Weber received from the revisionist/patriot community, and then ask this question: Is the revisionist/patriot community getting a good return on their money?

For said years, the IHR/Mark Weber took in the following in "Contributions, Gifts, Grants, And Similar Amounts Received: Direct Public Support."

Tax Year 2000--$346, 572

Tax Year 2001---$209, 229

Tax Year 2002---$610, 152

Tax Year 2003--$210, 363

Tax Year 2005--$409, 477

Tax Year 2006--$299, 623

Now, this adds up to be $2,085,416. That is to say, the IHR/Mark Weber took in $2,085,416 in donations from the Revisionist/patriot community for these six tax years. Have we, in turn, received a good return on our money????

I say, Hell no!!! Mark Weber destroyed the Journal of Historical Review, the yearly IHR conferences, the IHR's book publishing arm, and the IHR newsletter. He even refuses to sponsor a weekly Radio talk show!

What does Mark Weber/IHR do to deserve $2,085,416 from the Revisionist/patriot community???? Well, he sends out newspaper clippings to one thousand people or less. He sells a bunch of old books and DVDs, many of which are decades old. He attempts to market the works of others like Kevin MacDonald and Pat Buchanan--books that can be obtained cheaper elsewhere. And finally, every once in a great while Weber writes a short essay or gives a short speech.

In my opinion, this is madness!!!! The $2,085,416 is a horrendous waste of money!! I can think of far more productive ways to utilize this money than to send it to Mark Weber.

Paul Grubach

Quote on Revisionists

"Much of the predictable hostility toward my piece has come from people who are basically cultists or fanatics."

The story for Feb 14 that Weber posted is NOT about this year's demonstration at all--but about the demonstration in 2005. In other words, it is not even new news but old, stale news from four years ago. Obviously, Weber is overpaid.

His readers must be so senile that Weber doesn't even have to give them current news. Just give them anything that looks like it might appeal to someone of a right-wing persuasion--and that makes it appear he is at least doing something.

No, Weber is clearly not a revisionist and actually hurts revisionism. But this is actually quite old, Germar Rudolf wrote about Weber's laziness or incompetence before he was arrested (he didn't know, but suspected, that Weber wasn't a revisionist). He probably just hangs on to I.H.R. because it's a sinecure and he can't get a real job anywhere else.

"The dead came back from Jerusalem, where they did not find what they were seeking."

Mark Weber is not a revisionist. Listen to the shows that Michael Collins Piper on RBN did recently, at least four in a row, where he outlined all the evidence that Mark Weber not only helped to destroy Liberty Lobby, but also tried to ruin Willis Carto.

Not only do Piper and Carto have low opinions of Weber, so does famous Attorney Mark Lane and the late William Pierce, whom Weber tried to use and scam money out of.

Let's face it, when a 'revisionist' announces to the world that 'revisionism' is no longer 'relevant', you have to wonder what, exactly he's up to. Relevant to what? He claims that even if the revisionists were successful in exposing the Holohoax, that Israel won't change its genocidal policies, as if that's why we do what we do.

He's simply lying. During the court case between Liberty Lobby and Willis Carto, it became clear that many of the people around Mark Weber were powerful Jews and non-Jews with connections to the ADL and even the Mossad. This, in and of itself, is disturbing to say the least.

Yes, his website continues to publish revisionist articles, but I believe that's only for show so that he can continue to grab the money that he stole from Willis Carto in the fraudulent lawsuit that he brought against him. If you listen to Piper's shows, you'll realize how sick Weber really is.