Review My PDF

Generate My PDF

If you are generating a PDF of a journal article or book chapter, please provide title and author information.

BHL stores this information to allow these articles to be indexed, searched and retrieved by other users. If you download an article but do not provide title or author information, these articles will be lost.

Thank you for your request. Please wait for an email containing a link to download the PDF.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

There was an issue with the request. Please try again and if the problem persists, please send us feedback.

bottom-marginannotationthe «perfect» union «» of th two adjoining arms or legs of some of these monsters, is vry striking . from End Slip 1, Side 1annotation111. The perfect union of one leg or arm of some double monsters very striking

lines 11—15scorelines 11—14scorelines 12—14underline "un ... nutrition"line 21underline "n'avoir ... aucune"lines 5—28annotationcase of a perfect ‹monster,› individual bearng another head with no trunk on it — How curious this new course of th arteries

lines 14—17scoreline 17underline "La ... pour"lines 12—26annotationbecause the jaw is generally only developed in these parasites — good instance of this Law of "soi pour soi" bottom-marginannotationV. p 285 where this is discussed.) X N.B . I dont see, why, if a jaw , enveloped in an amorphous mass , be considered as an individual — why ‹not› an additional finger shd not? He wd answer because an additional finger make asymmitrical part of the perfect individual:— yet why not law of "soi pour soi" put this finger in proper place — improbable

lines 16—19scorelines 20—22scorefrom End Slip 1, Side 1annotation284 — on some «double» monsters breeding , opposed to their sterility ; but then it is th one perfect which breeds. —377 fertile generally.

⇑lines 13—10score in pale pencil⇑lines 12—11underline in pale pencil "plus ... chien"⇑line 11underline "chez le boeuf"from End Slip 3, Side 1annotation in pale pencil 352 «X»t01 trunk so frquent in Pig.— relation between monstrosities & varieties from End Slip 1, Side 1annotation352 monsters occur differently in number & head in different species — a trunk specially common in ‹Ele› Pigs.—

lines 1—2underline "Lorsqu'on ... groupes"lines 11—16scorefrom End Slip 1, Side 1annotation284 — on some «double» monsters breeding , opposed to their sterility ; but then it is th one perfect which breeds. —377 fertile generally.

lines 1—4scorelines 5—8scorelines 9—10scorelines 7—9annotation in blue crayon X ⇑lines 2—1score⇑lines 4—1annotation(Q) lines 17—19scorefrom End Slip 3, Side 1annotation in pale pencil 392 first formd tends monstrous ∵ «(X)»t01 late «(Q)»t02 organs must be affected by first formed (Andral)t03from End Slip 1, Side 1annotation392. organs or parts later formed, always must be affected by causes producing monstrosities. «(Q)» quotes Andral — on first formed least monstrous — (shows most monstrosities do not come on very early) from End Slip 1, Side 3annotation392. [he means `592'?] (Q)

[continues overleaf] 15—16 score⇑lines 3—1scorefrom End Slip 3, Side 2annotation406 distinction betwen amont of development & of functiont01from End Slip 1, Side 2annotation406. distinction between arrest of development & of formation

bottom-marginannotationXXX according to the bearng of this discussion, there wd be only an analogy, between a man become fat by much eating, «or large» ‹&› one born ‹with tendeny to fatten, or grw large;› fat or large; which I think is false?—

[continues overleaf] ⇑6 underline "variabilité anomale"⇑lines 5—1score⇑line 2underline "constante ... importante"⇑lines 8—6annotation(Q) ⇑lines 8—4score⇑line 10—bottom-marginannotationWhat is Owens law? about these organs? is it that the reduction of these organs is a step in developmt. from End Slip 1, Side 2annotation456 again insists on law of number varying in part when numerous, & being in itself variable from End Slip 1, Side 2annotation456 Summary on laws governing variation — generally rudiments — (hence cause does not act vry early)

lines 8—9double scorelines 8—9underline "semblables ... analogues"from End Slip 1, Side 2annotation462 on homologous parts uniting both in monstrosities & in Nature.— Do not some account for this by division of cells at some period of growth ??

⇑lines 12—10score⇑lines 12—10score in pale pencil⇑lines 13—12annotation in pale pencil see Roy Catalogue ⇑lines 9—7score in pale pencil⇑line 9underline in pale pencil "t. XXXIV"⇑line 7underline in pale pencil "t. ... 511"⇑lines 9—7double scorebottom-marginannotationStudy this to see, whether small deviations, as long legs &c were produced — In plants we know it is from treatmnt of parents & act of generation — from End Slip 1, Side 2annotation499 arguments for monstrosities being produced late & 500 Read , 503 (see Roy Catalogue).— 506, 7