The Economics of the Big Cut

It’s quick, it’s painless, it’s free, and it cuts HIV infection in men by up to 60%.

Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a powerful tool for combating HIV in areas with high prevalence rates of the virus, according to the World Health Organization.

Nonetheless, men aren’t typically pounding down the door to get the operation. So government agencies, health workers, and NGOs in South Africa are trying to find ways to encourage more men to undergo the procedure.

Another postcard focused on their partners. “2 out of 3 partners of uncircumcised men would prefer that their partner be circumcised.”

A third contained just the basic information on circumcision.

Wilson and Friedman then created another set of postcards containing the same three types of messages, but with an added economic incentive of R100 (US$6.69) for simply walking into a clinic to discuss circumcision with a health worker.

The researchers found that the messages appealing to masculinity and partners were both fairly effective at encouraging men to get circumcised. But the single most effective technique was the seven-dollar compensation—even though it was a modest amount, and even though men could get the money and leave the clinic without actually undergoing the procedure.

“Why did they not take the money and leave?” asks Prof. Wilson. “Why was it so effective at bringing people in?”

People generally don’t do a good job taking preventive steps to protect their health, Wilson says. We tend to put off things that are inconvenient or involve mild discomfort, he says, even when we know they are good for us. Yet economists have struggled to formulate a systematic approach to this kind of behavior.

“We don’t have a formal model of procrastination,” he said.

Wilson’s professional research focuses on fundamental puzzles about human behavior, such as encouraging people to invest in preventive health and reduce procrastination.

CHAPS hopes that the findings trickle upward and influence policymakers in African nations affected by the spread of HIV/AIDS. The effectiveness of these postcards may yet prove a better tool for persuading people than a billboard or a conventional public information campaign.