Singapore's state-run investment agency Temasek
Holdings has won approval from China's central bank to buy a 5 percent
stake in Bank of China, half what it had sought, the Caijing business magazine
said in its latest edition published on Monday. Temasek agreed in September
to buy 10 percent of China's third-largest lender but the bank's biggest
shareholder, Central Huijin Investment Co., blocked the deal amid concerns
Beijing has been selling off chunks of its banks to foreigners too cheaply.

"Temasek's investment in Bank of China has won approval, but the size of the
investment has been reduced to 5 percent from the original 10 percent," the
Caijing said, citing unnamed government sources.

Under the approved plan, Temasek would buy 5 percent in new shares from Bank
of China, scrapping its earlier bid to buy another 5 percent from Central
Huijin, the central bank's investment agency that manages foreign currency funds
injected into the nation's big state banks.

"Bank of China will implement its stock listing plan at the fastest possible
speed after getting the investment," the magazine said.

Bank of China plans to list its shares overseas next year.

The bank
had already won approval to sell a 10 percent stake to a consortium led by Royal
Bank of Scotland for $3.1 billion. The other strategic investors are UBS and
Manila-based Asian Development Bank.

China's national welfare fund had been given the green light to invest 10
billion yuan in each of the country's two largest commercial banks -- Industrial
and Commercial Bank of China and Bank of China, state media have reported.

The welfare fund's investment follows a backlash in China against inroads by
foreign institutions into China's banking industry.

Central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan has recently defended the strategic
sales as necessary to bring cash and expertise into an industry saddled with bad
loans and poor management practices that are a legacy of decades of politically
directed lending.

Banking regulator Liu Mingkang has also rejected charges that Beijing was
selling off stakes too cheaply or giving foreign banks too much influence over
the economy.