David Weinehall wrote:> > > in and changing the code is clearly not an option. The only options> > Huh? Most likely, your code is broken, rather than blaming the> messenger, act properly upon the received message.>

When, and whether to do that should be my choice.

(And as the code in question was handling an entirenation's 1-800 traffic, we stuck with the old compiler,ta very much).