Expecting to find fraud, the author found
murder. And the Israeli-American Imperium.

A man whom the statesmen of the western
world inundate with decorations and honorary degrees, who is praised
as just for his life of injustice, as humane for his life full of
hatred, and as "moral authority" for a dozen demonstrable perjuries,
is unmasked in this book as a common crook on the basis of numerous
documents, some of which have never been published before.

When Gerd Honsik began writing this book,
drawing on Wizenthal's personal data and a precise analysis of his
autobiography Justice Not vengeance, he believed that he was
merely documenting the history of a crook of international stature.

But the author came across a multitude of
criminal offenses, all of them apparently growing out of one and the
same ignoble tendency, namely the desire to gain advantages or even a
living through cunning and deception.

Honsik believed he was exposing the true
face of a hateful old man, but what he found was the head of the
worldwide anti-German agitation of the American Imperium in Austria,
who is evidently able and authorized to act cold-bloodedly and with
the collaboration of American and Israeli offices in world-wide
endeavors.

At first, the following details strike us as
confusing, and may be new even to people who have long been familiar
with Wizenthal.

It begins with the fact that the man whom
you know as Sit-non Wiesenthal is not truly called Simon Wiesenthal
at all. To save himself the bother of formally changing his name, he
chose the approach most closely suited to his nature: in his
pertinent affidavits he lied to the authorities in question so long
and so persistently that eventually they no longer opposed his
longed-for Germanization of his Polish-Yiddish name.

Szymon Wizenthal, of whom you believe
that he "miraculously" survived twelve or thirteen concentration
camps, was spared harassment during the time of the great persecution
of the Jews, during the so-called "Holocaust", from spring 1942 until
summer 1944. While Wizenthal himself claims that first 12, later
6 and now still 1.5 million of his ethnic brethren were herded into
so-called "gas chambers", his personal files prove that he himself
was excused from such a fate by Hitler's Germany. What is more, his
personal documents show that the Reich's Employment Office, knowing
of Wizenthal's Jewish ethnicity, assigned him a job with
the

11

German State Railway, as German wage-earner
- a fact which work-shy Wizenthal cannot forgive or forget to this
day.

His German superiors during that time were
two men by the names of Günthert and Kohlrautz. Immediately
after the war he tried to denounce them by means of perjured
testimony; today he describes them as his saviors, and according to
his current account they "strictly" ensured his "fair treatment".

So while our soldiers starved, froze and
bled their lives away at the front, and while Jewish families were
torn apart when members of either sex who were able to work were
interned in concentration camps where they were then subjected to the
terrorism of Polish overseers and the raging of terrible typhus
epidemics, which the SS physicians were only poorly equipped to deal
with, the figurehead of the "Holocaust" collected his Reichsmark from
the Reich German payroll, Friday after Friday. His lady wife also
found employment in the same office. The somewhat feeblesounding
claim which turns up all too often in Wizenthal's discourses, namely
that he "is ashamed to have miraculously survived" while his
religious brethren did not, takes on a deeper meaning when one sees
the evidence for that dispensation which blessed him and his wife
with a more pleasant existence during those worst years than that
enjoyed by the vast majority of German soldiers or the men and women
in the Jewish labor details in the concentration camps.

The reasons for which our Galician
figurehead did eventually get to make the acquaintance of some
concentration camps were the advance of the Red Army and the hasty
evacuation of Lemberg (Lvov) by the German military administration.
However, documents irrefutably show that in the course of his
evacuation Wizenthal was put up, not in twelve, but rather only in
two German concentration camps, and for a comparatively short time
only.

His alleged stay in the concentration camp
Auschwitz - which he later tried to explain as the stop which his
train made in the train station of the city by that same name - is a
blatant lie. He never passed through the gates to that camp.

He claims the title "academically accredited
engineer" (Diplomingenieur, or Dipl-Ing.) wrongfully,
persistently, and with impunity.

In Austrian courts he enjoys the privilege
of giving false testimony and submitting forged documents without
being called to account for these transgressions.

In the spring of 1992, with the aid of false
titles such as "Representative of Constitutional Law", and covered by
the Austrian Minister of Justice

12

Nikolaus Michalek in abuse of his office,
Wizenthal wormed his way into the Austrian Parliament where he and
several other biased Jews combined forces to effect a special law
against the author of this book, Gerd Honsik, as well as against
Honsik's books, articles and poetry.

But that is not yet the extent of this man's
secret.

Between childish vanity, tale-telling and
boastfulness, between the falsification of his personal data, of his
place of birth, of his surname and given name, even of his ethnicity
and mother tongue, between his wrongful assumption of an academic
degree, the falsification of his personal history and even the
submission of perjured testimony and forged letters in court, the
author's researches turned up yet another sordid discovery: the
frightening abyss of a human soul, and the enjoyment and pleasurable
lingering over human suffering.

The study of Wizenthal's own words reveals
to us a voyeur of misery and horror - a voyeur who hangs on every
word of his victims' spouses and documents their first despairing,
stammering, sobbing words following the conviction of their loved
ones, and who mocks and scourges the loyalty of the next-of-kin with
acid scorn.

I believe that Gerd Honsik has succeeded, in
this book, in proving not only that what we are dealing with in the
historical phenomenon of "Szymon Wizenthal" is a personality with
criminal tendencies, but also that Wizenthal is a sick man; a man who
derives pleasure from other people's suffering and who avails himself
of anti-German incitement - which fits in so well with the American
world power's post-War political concept - as a niche in which he can
indulge his morbid tendencies unchecked, without being exposed and
ostracized by society, and even with their approval to further
enhance his satisfaction of his morbid drive!

In this way it has become possible that,
from Wizenthal's own perspective, his life must be considered a happy
and fulfilled one. He, the man who only ever faces the cameras of the
media with deadly serious mien, laughs often, long and maliciously,
when he feels unobserved, as Gerd Honsik proves in this book with
impressive photographs gained in the course of extensive research in
many different archives.

Almost as a by-product, as it were, the
author's many years of investigative research also yielded
indications pointing to the gravest crime of all: murder.

At first it turned out that those victims
who were made responsible for the "Holocaust" did not all "confess",
as Wizenthal has always claimed. Rather, the reverse is
true:

13

In not one of twelve cases which Wizenthal
himself has called "typical" can he prove that such a confession
regarding the existence of "gas chambers" was ever made. Obviously
this even goes for the Eichmann case, since otherwise it is not
likely that the Austrian legal subject expert Professor Dr. Jagschitz
would have been denied all access to the relevant files in Israel
(Honsik case, May 1992, Hv 5720/90).

On the contrary: Honsik even proves that
the majority of those hunted by Wizenthal firmly disputed the
"Holocaust".

And in this context, the author made yet
another shocking discovery:

Ten of the twelve fugitive "deniers of
the gas chambers" died under mysterious circumstances.

In the case of Alois Brunner (Georg
Fischer), a treacherous attempt on his life was made from Austria by
means of a letter bomb, and Honsik found concrete evidence for Szymon
Wizenthal's complicity:

The author shows that Wizenthal knew,
verbatim, the contents of the letter that was enclosed with the bomb
- a detail known only to the perpetrators themselves, and to the
Syrian homicide squad.

Based on the fact that after 1945
Wizenthal had already worked closely together with the head of a
Jewish murder squad, the author accompanied the publication of his
book with the institution of legal proceedings against Szymon
Wizenthal under the Austrian Criminal Code, for murder and on
suspicion of murder in twelve cases for the time being.

Unintimidated by Wizenthal's power over
western politicians, by the awards that have been heaped on him, and
by the worldwide cooperation between the international press and the
powerful secret services of the Israeli-American Imperium, and in the
awareness of the mysterious deaths that came upon the
Holocaust-doubters that crossed Wizenthal's path, the author exposes
the levers, the chief players, and the command structure of the
world-encompassing power which, though barely even still trying to
conceal itself, has remained largely unrecognized by most people.

But Honsik does not disclose all:

He shows the reader the Israeli-American
power's eerie world only as far as Wizenthal himself exposes it. But
the very fact that the author contents himself with training the
reader's eye for that which Wizenthal himself feels he can reveal is
what gives this book its fascination and its power.

For me it was also interesting to learn in a
conversation with Gerd Honsik that when he first began his study of
Wizenthal he was inclined to attribute the many patently false Jewish
witness statements regarding the so-called "war crimes trials" (which
have been restricted to German

14

defendants) to the influence of the Jewish
religion. Honsik based this belief on a Federal German court report
from 1953 which confirmed that religious Jews are permitted to
perjure themselves in testimony against non-Jews. In the course of
his investigations, however, Honsik came across a whole host of brave
Jewish witnesses for the defense - the vast majority of whom were not
granted a hearing before German courts.

For Honsik, discovering Jewish honesty and
love of truth was the heartening experience which, I believe, gave
him the strength to finish this painstaking study. From the
distressing view of the intellectual life and customs of the western
world, which this book reveals to us, we realize with consternation
that political deceit and political crimes have been ever-present in
our lives all these years, disguised behind the masks of democracy
and freedom of the press. And that is the message of this book:

That mankind has never before been this much
at anyone's mercy. Never this badly deceived. And never in the hands
of a more evil power.

Against such a mighty enemy, however, a book
seems to me to be no more than a book, a weapon with little bite.

This book does not question the so-called
"Holocaust", as our semiofficial historiography and our justice
system have come to call the "mass murder of human beings during the
Third Reich, by means including gas". After all, according to the
spring 1992 decision of the Austrian Parliament, such questioning
would be a criminal offense.

This book does, however, point out the harm
which the "figurehead" of this "Holocaust" has done to this
semi-official and legally enforced view of history through his lies,
perjury, falsifications and fraud which are documented
here.

I appeal to the Austrian and the German
Ministers of Justice as well as to the American and the Israeli
justice systems to break with the machinations of Szymon
Wizenthal.

At the same time I request the reopening
of proceedings in the following cases: Demjanjuk, Weise, Rauff,
Eichmann, Stangl, Wagner, Mengele, Roschmann, Heim, Braunsteiner,
Kutschmann and Gogl, as well as the cases of all persons convicted
since 1945 by Austrian, German, Israeli, Russian, Czech, Dutch,
Belgian, French, Polish and Yugoslav courts for "war crimes" or for
"murders of Jews".

At the same time I would also warn the
politicians, the representatives of the justice systems and the news
media of the aforementioned nations:

Any continued collaboration with this
person, who is exposed here as highly criminal, will at some point in
the future result not only in immeasurable political consequences but
probably also in criminal charges against those who made the
phenomenon "Szymon Wizenthal" possible in the first place.

A man who commits perjury 14 times in the
course of 14 inquiries into his and other people's past will
eventually become insupportable despite the position and power of his
backers. Any measures henceforth taken to artificially prolong this
criminal's political and moral role will inevitably reflect on his
protectors.

Our remembrance of the efforts of Dr. Bruno
Kreisky, perhaps the last great humanist among German Jewry
altogether, places this obligation on us!

The memory of the monster in human form
known as Wizenthal must be kept alive for all the world:

Wizenthal must not die!

Before the Austrian, German, American and
Israeli judiciaries, and on the basis of the facts and documents I
have submitted in this volume,

17

I hereby bring criminal charges against
Szymon Wizenthal for the following crimes:
1. perjured testimony
2. falsification of documents
3. membership in a criminal organization
4. submission of false evidence in court
5. acting as accessory to kidnapping
6. common fraud
7. unlawful pretense to an academic title
8. fraudulent exercise of a public office
9. incitement to race hatred
10. disparagement of the memory of persons deceased
11. suspicion of incitement to murder in twelve cases to date
12. attempted assassination of Alois Brunner.

At the same time I ask that Wizenthal be stripped of his
Austriancitizenship,
which he obtained through a wealth of perjured
statements.

Wizenthal sells his Jewishness for 30
pieces of silver. He turns his dead mother into an ethnic German.
Instead of being abducted by "the Germans", he claims he was expelled
by the Poles. As for his mother tongue, Yiddish, he denies that
entirely. To do so, he repeatedly lied under oath. For money. As
shown here. And in doing so he fraudulently diverts into his own
pocket part of those relief funds provided by the West German state
for the 14 million genuine ethnic Germans who really were expelled
from their homeland by policies substantially determined by Jews - 14
million Germans, of whom 2.5 million old men, women and children lost
their lives to the Jew Ilya Ehrenburg's call for genocide.

In 1949, four years after the end of the
War, the reconstruction of Austria is in full swing. But one person
would rather not work: our vagabond friend Szymon Wizenthal of
Galicia. Even though "architects" are badly needed and he allegedly
earned this title, and even though he is as healthy as a horse, so
that even in those days any doctor could have told him that he would
live to be over 90, Szymon prefers to become perhaps the first social
assistance freeloader in the Second Republic. And at that time he
probably never thought that in doing so he became the founding father
of an entire profession. The first time he begged for social
assistance (cf. Document p. ), he still states his nationality as
"Polish"; as yet he doesn't speak Yiddish. In later Restitution
campaigns he remembers that his mother tongue is Yiddish, and at that
point his German and Polish mother tongues have lost their prominence
(cf Document p. ).

But this miscreant is insatiable. A short
time later he needs more money, and now his nationality changes. In
1956 Wizenthal feels the need to harvest some more: the German
"economic miracle" enables West Germany to satisfy not only Jewish
demands, but also to make compensatory payments to the expelled
ethnic Germans; now Wizenthal suddenly claims to be an ethnic German,
and as evidence to support his claim he cites having attended a
German school for two years in Vienna.

Bu this line of reasoning, all Austrians who
ever attended grammar school in France would be French, and the
children of the Japanese Ambassador in Bonn who attend the English
school there would be British. The Basques would be Spaniards since
there are dual-class public schools even in the heart of the
Pyrenees, the South Tyroleans would be ethnic Italians for the same
reason, and the Palestinians would be Jews.

21

Wizenthal doesn't mind alternating his
ethnic affiliation between the "criminals" and the "victims".

His claim for compensation contains a
particularly audacious lie at the point where a false witness
statement is appended. This testimonial was obligingly issued by one
Dr. Alexander Rybaczewsky, who eagerly confirms that the language
spoken in Wizenthal's parental home was always German.

No-one who has ever heard Wizenthal speak
German can doubt for a second that what he is hearing is not a German
speaking German, but a Polish Jew trying to make do in the German
language. The Yiddish dialect, which formed the basis for countless
Austrian jokes of the inter-war years and which also became part of
underworld jargon ("thieves' cant"), is marked by an odd kind of
sentence construction which is no less characteristic of Wizenthal's
style of speaking than is the unmistakable tone of his speech per
se, which gives him away as a person whose mother tongue is
Yiddish.

Aside from that, in an October 16, 1958
letter to the Red Cross he gave his Jewish, not his German ethnicity
as the reason for his imprisonment in the concentration camp. In my
files I also have documents in which he lists the languages he
speaks, with German mentioned either not at all, or in last position
behind Polish, Yiddish, Czech, Russian and English.

In this, Wizenthal probably stands apart
from all other Jews: that he found the depravity of character to deny
his Jewish ethnicity for money - to use false pretenses, in the
intent to defraud for the sake of personal gain, to collect money as
"German expellee".

Lies in lieu of oath.
The documentation of a common fraud.

To prove his German ethnicity in his
November 12, 1956 application for restitution, Szymon Wizenthal
affirms in lieu of oath that his mother tongue is German (cf. p. ).
From page 11 of the January 16, 1949 "Application of Assistance" (cf.
facsimile p. ) we can see clearly that Wizenthal and his family
listed Yiddish as their mother tongue, mentioned Polish in second
place, and put German third - the language which Wizenthal does not
master without an accent to this day. This is also a statement which
he made in lieu of oath.

This man obviously does not take oaths very
seriously.

The documents shown here prove that
Wizenthal - by claiming two different mother tongues to two different
authorities, depending on

22

whichever was most useful to him at the
time - resorted to false pretense for his personal gain.

This clearly constitutes fraud. But Szymon
Wizenthal made false, fraudulent claims under oath in other respects
as well. He also lied to the Federal Republic of Germany with respect
to the real reasons (which could be objectively verified at any time)
for his move from Poland to Austria. While alleging to West German
authorities that he was expelled by the Polish for his German
ethnicity, in the aforementioned "Application of Assistance" he
stated in Section ad24, in stumbling German and with Yiddish sentence
construction:

"Abducted by the Germans from Polish
territory in the year 1944. As forced laborer."

So now Wizenthal was not expelled by the
Polish, but abducted by the Germans. (In actual fact he was evacuated
when the Red Army advanced in 1944.) When he was asked whether he
wanted to return to Poland - which was an option available to hint,
in contrast to the genuine German expellees - Wizenthal answered
(ad26):

"No. - I lost everything in Poland, I
want to go to Izrael."

Because he did not wish to accept Communist
expropriation and the Communist living conditions, he chose not to
return.

So the Poles did not consider him a German,
but a Polish Jew. Well, of course. The reason why Wizenthal did not
then really move to the land of his dreams, but rather discovered his
"Austrianness", maybe found in his passionate declaration of love for
the German nation (a love affair lasting precisely as long as it took
him to apply for restitution) and in the immense opportunities which
that nation offered him for its financial management.

Analyzing Wizenthal's profession of German
ethnicity - a temporary one, dictated by material interests - is
quite revealing. On page 2 of his book Justice Not Vengeance
he writes, for example:

"While most Jews grow up in a
predominantly non-Jewish environment, or, conversely, in a ghetto,
Jews represented the majority population in Buchach. There were 6000
Jews alongside only 2000 Poles and 1000 Ukrainians."

So according to his own statements, there
was not even a German ethnic group in his home town, Buchach.

In context it is evident that Wizenthal
counted himself among the ethnically Jewish. It is readily proven
that the mother tongue of the Jews in Galicia was always Yiddish,
regardless how fluently they may have spoken German in this case or
that. Therefore, if one considers ethnic or even racial factors -
which were standard in the Third Reich and are still used as a basis

23

for relevant decisions by the Israelis today
- there is no more basis for accepting Wizenthal's German ethnicity
than there is for using nationality or the principle of professed
ethnicity as sole criterion.

To summarize:

1. Under the laws of the Third Reich
Wizenthal was not an ethnic German, he was an ethnic Jew.

2. Wizenthal was also not considered an
ethnic German by the Polish state, and for this reason was also not
expelled. Rather, according to his own statements, he voluntarily
dispensed with returning to his home due to the expropriation of his
possessions by the Communists. Thus, he lied when he passed himself
off as "ethnic German expellee".

3. If one establishes Wizenthal's
nationality by those criteria which are generally applied today to
negate ethnic factors - i.e. if one judges by citizenship - then
Wizenthal could not have been certified anything but Polish in those
days.

4. If, on the other hand, one were to
judge on the basis of the generally undisputed principle of professed
ethnicity, then Wizenthal, who loudly proclaims his Jewishness time
and again and who frequently speaks in derogatory terms about "the
Germans" and "the Austrians", can also not be considered an ethnic
German.

5. This book will show that Wizenthal
repeatedly abused the memory of his late mother to further his evil
machinations. The document on page proves that he turned this old
lady into an ethnic German to assist in his concrete restitution
fraud. That he also falsified his wife's nationality follows from the
fact that his daughter was allowed to emigrate to Israel. In this
context it is necessary to point out that the strict Israeli race
laws, the most stringent in the world, acknowledge only such persons
to be Jewish (i.e. entitled to immigrate) who can prove that they are
the child of a Jewish mother.

Since it is not likely that the
Wizenthals' daughter was able to deceive the Israeli authorities by
mendaciously turning her "ethnic German" mother into a Jewish one, I
think it more plausible that Wizenthal also falsified his wife's
ethnicity in the Application of Assistance at hand.

To summarize, we can say: Wizenthal
betrayed not only his own Jewishness for money, but also that of his
own mother, his own father and his lawful wedded wife by mendaciously
alleging their German ethnicity.

At this point one must really wonder whether
this crook from Galicia truly believes in the "Holocaust" himself.
Given all the charges laid at the

24

Germans' doorstep by semi-official
historiography, and thus by Wizenthal himself as well, it would be
hard to imagine that a human soul could harbor a chasm so deep that
it would allow him to falsify the ethnicity of his own mother, who
allegedly died in a German concentration camp, and to turn her into a
member of the "criminal nation", for the sake of a monthly
Restitution check.

Perhaps official Israel can forgive him
by pointing out that his profession of German ethnicity lasted only
the half-hour it took him to draw up and submit his fraudulent
application, and that after all it was only the German state and the
German expellees whom he defrauded.

Any honorable Jew, however, will surely turn
from Wizenthals activities in anger and disgust.

Jews in Austria are welcome to declare
themselves Germans, as Friedrich Adler, Dr. Michael Stern and
Benedikt Kautsky have done - in other words, when they are people who
grew up in the German ethnic and cultural sphere and are demonstrably
tied to the same. Wizenthal, however - the itinerant preacher of
Germanophobia and professional slanderer of the German Wehrmacht and
the Waffen-SS - cannot possibly be, nor become, German. His false
professions cannot slander our good people; they can only bring
disgrace to Wizenthal himself and to those who made him possible.

A few brief vignettes of Wizenthal, the
"ethnic German":

"Though Wiesenthal's work has time and
again focused the attention of the world public on Austrian
and German war criminals, he has always refused to brand those two
nations as the chosen people of evil."

The person who wrote this on p. 6 of the
Foreword to Justice Not vengeance is none other than
Wizenthal's confidant Peter Michael Lingens (Wizenthal's former
secretary), embellishing his master's image. Wizenthal's "refusal" to
brand "those two nations as chosen people of evil" must have taken
place behind closed doors, and so quietly that 100 million Germans
and the rest of the world heard none of it.

But it is interesting that Lingens, just
like his master, describes "the Austrians" and "the Germans" as two
separate and different nations. In light of this, how can Wizenthal's
two years at an Austrian school - which he cites in his
Application of Assistance - serve as proof for his belonging to the
German nation, considering that a profession of German
ethnicity is considered in Austria today to be proof of Nazi
connections? Considering that the official claim, today, is that the
Austrians are not members of the German nation? Under these
circumstances, two years' attendance at a Chinese village school
should also guarantee Korean ethnicity!

"Wreisky' - Wiesenthal thus sums up
his essential feelings in a single sentence - `has severed himself
from the Jewish community of destiny. And, in my eyes, anyone who
does that is a deserter."'

Correct! But the deserter's name is not
Kreisky, it is Wizenthal. And he diligently collects his pieces of
silver for it, month after month and year after year.

Jews that are still respected and
esteemed in Austria today have Dr. Bruno Kreisky's work and honesty
to thank for that. Kreisky knew no split loyalties; he only had
one allegiance, namely to Austria.

Admittedly, Wizenthal too is not one of
those Jews whom split loyalties cause pangs of conscience. His
allegiance is exclusively to the IsraeliAmerican Imperium and to
satisfying his sick drive, to which we shall return elsewhere (see
chapter "Sadism").

On page 298 of his book Wizenthal
comments:

"Bruno Kreisky threw the whole weight
of his personality on to the scales in order to turn
public opinion in the direction which, in a sense, was the
predictable one: `There's got to be an end some time - and why is
that man Wiesenthal still allowed to live here... ?'More than anyone
else, this Jewish Chancellor, who had to flee from the Nazis and
whose relations were murdered by the Nazis, set the definitive
yardsticks by which the Austrian public measures its own past
."

This reveals an interesting aspect of
Wizenthal's views on ethnicity: he calls Bruno Kreisky, the Austrian
Chancellor, a "Jewish Chancellor", even though he knows full well (we
refer the reader to the previous quotation from p. 6) that Bruno
Kreisky no longer considers himself Jewish. Evidently Wizenthal
believes that one cannot escape one's Jewishness even if one chooses
to do so. And with that crass Old Testament theory of blood and soil,
his own 30-minute profession of German ethnicity, limited as it is to
the creation of his fraudulent Application of Assistance, is revealed
as malicious deception.

The following quotation from page 30 of JNV
is also of interest regarding Wizenthal's attitude towards the German
people:

"For the first time in my life I saw
what enormous cowards these people were; how, instead of dealing with
their guilt, they tried to deny it, to suppress it so far that in the
end they couldn't see it themselves. We didn't feel like talking to
these people, but we realized one thing: the Germans and the
Austrians would not simply acknowledge with shame what we had
experienced -they would dispute it."

26

There can be no doubt that this allegation
of "enormous cowardice" represents a castigation, on
Wizenthal's part, of the national character of "the Germans"
and "the Austrians" and thus constitutes a criminal act
classified by our justice system as "incitement", or "hatemongering".
Here we not only have proof of Wizenthal's anti-German mission, we
also see that he embraces the concept of collective guilt, which he
has repeatedly tried to deny in recent years. For the "cowardly
people" who "tried to deny their guilt, to suppress it so far
that in the end they couldn't see it themselves" refers to the
Germans as a people - as is clearly apparent in context.

It also proves that Wizenthal considers
himself to be neither a German nor an Austrian: he juxtaposes the
action of the Germans and the Austrians with "what we had
experienced", and he certainly cannot have meant "we" to mean the
ethnic Germans.

On page 159 Wizenthal writes:

"In eastern Europe there was scarcely
a spot where the Germans had not committed some crime."

This quotation also clearly constitutes
incitement. Aside from that, this claim is an outright falsification
of history even for the reason that the popularity of the Germans in
the East during the Second World War was so great that three times as
many Soviet citizens fought on the German side as partisans had taken
the Communists' side against the Germans. Further, recent opinion
polls have leaked out, according to which the degree of popularity
enjoyed by the Germans in the Baltic, in Russia and in the Ukraine
greatly outdistances that of all other western European nations - and
any traveler can convince himself of the correctness of these polls.

The only worrisome poll results are those
concerning anti-Semitism in the Eastern nations today.

Instead of airing this hateful tirade
against the Germans, Wizenthal (the "ethnic German") should perhaps
have said:

"In eastern Europe there was scarcely
a spot where the Bolshevists (among whom the Jews were particularly
numerous) had not committed some crime." (cf. Lew
Kopelew, Und schuf mir einen Gotzen, Munich: dtv.) The mass
graves which have recently been found "in the East" contained the
bodies of people murdered not by "the Germans", but by the
Bolshevists, which further emphasizes my advice to Wizenthal.

Moreover, our Galician storyteller states
(p. 216):

"The Polish anti-Semites forget
that... even a Jew brought up in the Polish language and the Polish
cultural tradition could never feel a fully integrated
citizen."

27

I ask Szymon Wizenthal, who in truth
actually spoke Yiddish at home and who, furthermore, was a Jew
brought up in the Polish language and the Polish cultural tradition,
how two years in a Viennese public school could have integrated him
into the German nation, if such an integration into the Polish nation
was not possible even after half a millennium of coexistence?

To summarize:

As this chapter has shown, Wizenthal has
clearly committed fraud: he has made false claims for personal gain
by mendaciously stating that he was expelled by the Poles from Polish
territory on the basis of his German ethnicity.

Wizenthal's disparaging remarks about the
national character of "the Austrians" and "the Germans", as quoted
here, clearly constitute the crime of incitement to race
hatred.

In 1989 a document which Wizenthal had
submitted to an Austrian court was exposed as forgery. Yet the old
forger's halo as upholder of moral standards remained untarnished.

The expert report which university professor
Dr. Gerhard Jagschitz drew up for my jury trial in May 1992 (Hv
5720/90) after five years of work showed for the first time that not
a single document which has been used to support the criminal charges
against National Socialist Germany (including the charges pertaining
to the "Holocaust") was ever allowed to be examined forensically.
Thus it had the left up to the representatives of semi-official
historiography - such as Professor Jagschitz - to confirm accepted
data "by means of textual criticism".

The technologically highly specialized
criminological institutions of the Western world, first and foremost
the Federal Criminal Police Office in Wiesbaden, have never been
consulted to examine the foundations of our existing view of history,
or of the penal legislation that shores it up. They very well could -
but they are not allowed to! With two exceptions: in the Demjanjuk
case (cf. the relevant chapter) and in engineer Rainer's libel suit
against the magazine Basta such forensic examination was
enforced for the first time:

In both cases, the forgery in question could
be clearly and readily established by means of simple scientific
methods.

It makes one wonder why the Federal Criminal
Police Office in Wiesbaden is not permitted to clear up, once and for
all, the grave doubts that have been raised about the authenticity of
the key documents of the "Holocaust" - mainly the "Wannsee Protocol"
and the " Gerstein Statement", which the Revisionists call
fabrications and for which even the historians of the Establishment
have now admitted to doubts (cf. the Jagschitz Report, Hv 5720/90).

One of Wizenthal's attempts
backfires.

In an attempt to discredit the Austrian
politician J6rg Haider, Wizenthal resorted to the pattern approach
described in this book ad infinitum. He summoned a journalist,
Wolfgang Fellner, who then launched the attack in tried-and-true
Wizenthal style in his magazine Basta (November 1986).

36

The liberal party representative Haider had
received some forested land from a family friend, Wilhelm Webhofer,
whose father - so Wizenthal's story went - had come into its
possession through the unlawful intervention of Carinthian Gauleiter
Rainer with the Reichsführer-SS, Heinrich Himmler. The article
in Basta stated:

"Initiated by Wiesenthal and the
Roifer family, the affair has now expanded. In the meantime,
documents have turned up in Vienna which are said to prove that the
enormous forest landholding in the Barental was actually a secret
source of funding for the Nazis." (Incidentally,
the secret documents have since vanished into the nothingness
whence they seemed ready to emerge at that time.)

"Simon Wiesenthal has already primed
this election bomb. Last week the prominent Nazi hunter got hold of
the entire 1939 correspondence surrounding the present Haider
property. According to Wiesenthal and his colleagues, the
correspondence proves conclusively that Webhofer's father Josef was
only given the entire Barental because he was a reliable Nazi
bigwig'.

"What is especially embarrassing for
Haider is that Wiesenthal discovered that the transfer of the huge
forest property... had been personally arranged between the two
infamous Nazi leaders Rainer (the Gauleiter of Carinthia) and
Himmler.

"A letter from these two, in which the
Barental is awarded to the 'reliable' Webhofer, exists."

At this stage of the attack, Wizenthal and
his syndicate met with unexpected resistance. The man who caused the
offensive to backfire was not Dr. Haider, the politician under
attack, but the son of the Gauleiter named in the incriminating
document. Engineer Friedl Rainer knew that his father, who had been
murdered by the Allies after 1945, had been a man of irreproachable
character and that in his capacity of Gauleiter of Carinthia he would
never have done such a reprehensible thing to the detriment of any
person, Jewish or otherwise.

This emotionally-based admiration for his
father, whom he had lost to Allied brutality when he was just a boy,
was strengthened further by the respect and sympathy expressed for
the murdered man to this day in

37

Carinthia by members of all political
factions and also by members of the two ethnic minorities, the
Slovenes and the Windish.

On the basis of these considerations,
engineer Friedl Rainer turned to an expert of an unusual kind:
engineer Emil Lachout.

In 1987 engineer Lachout had made many
people sit up and take notice when he presented a document which
proved that an Allied investigative committee, which had been charged
in 1948 with investigating the torture of SS men, had concluded that
in the concentration camps on German soil (these were the only ones
examined in the investigation) there had been no "gas chambers" where
people were murdered. In other words, there were none in Hartheim and
Mauthausen either.

Ever since then, engineer Lachout, who does
not fit into any particular political camp and is not a member of any
political party, has been pestered with preliminary proceedings
lasting for more than half a decade already, for "the resumption of
National Socialist activities". I shall just mention as an aside that
on the order of the Viennese Public Prosecutor's office and the
examining magistrate Dr. Roggla, this trial is now supposed to be
concluded in good old anti-Fascist manner by certifying the accused
psychologically unfit. (Just as political psychiatry is to be used
against the Revisionists Franz Radl and Ewald Stieber in Austria and
Tjudar Rudolph in Germany.)

With the aid of a magnifying glass and a
so-called typewriter atlas it took engineer Lachout only a few
minutes to expose the clumsy forgery provided by Szymon Wizenthal.

To restore his father's honor, engineer
Friedl Rainer went to court and filed charges against the publication
Basta (Ref. 9dE Vr 14826/86 Hv 3141/87). When engineer Rainer named
engineer Lachout as expert witness in court, Wizenthal's side
protested, so that the court commissioned the Criminal Investigations
Department of the Vienna police to perform the investigation.
Detective inspector Dietmar Junker conducted the forensic testing and
came to the same clear and scientifically replicable conclusion as
engineer Lachout had - namely, that Wizenthal had submitted an
amateurish forgery as incriminating document.

While the Wizenthal Syndicate subsequently
lost the case and had to retract its allegations, the Austrian media
saw fit to hush the matter up.

The old crook Szymon Wizenthal got off scot
free. May my book put this anti-German, anti-Austrian hatemonger's
armor to its first serious test!

Our scoundrel Wizenthal already began his
career as professional perjurer in 1945, when he offered himself to
the Americans as interrogation specialist for captured SS men who,
according to his own claims, were generally brought in to his body
searches "trembling all over".

An astonishing document from May 27, 1948
proves his readiness to serve as liar and perjurer: the American
National Archives in Washington, DC contain an affidavit given by
Wizenthal to the American secret service officer Curt Ponger which
demonstrates Wizenthal's morbid craving for admiration as well as his
penchant for lying and his unhesitating readiness to bear false
witness against his neighbor.

Since I have a transcript of this document
(Interrogation No. 2820) in my possession, I can share with you, my
reader, the fact that Wizenthal has kept a heroic aspect of his war
activities from us for decades: his role as partisan Major.

To Question 17 of the aforementioned
protocol our scoundrel replied:

"I had a high rank. I got it directly
due to the high degree of intelligence I showed as Lieutenant, then I
was promoted to Major, and in the end my commanding officer told me,
'if you survive all this you'll be made a First
Lieutenant."'

In the thirteen weeks of his flight from the
railway repair shop to Lemberg (Lvov) Wizenthal claims to have rushed
up the career ladder from Lieutenant to Major with the aid of his
self-diagnosed degree of intelligence. But the case of Szymon
Wizenthal may well demonstrate that intelligence need not always go
hand in hand with all-round education, since evidently he didn't know
that a Major cannot be promoted to First Lieutenant; this change in
rank can happen through demotion at best. Not to mention the fact
that Wizenthal, in his meteoric rise up the career ladder, simply
skipped the rank of Captain. It seems that Wizenthal did not become
familiar with military rank order until later, in his capacity as
organizer of incriminating testimony.

While Wizenthal claims today that German is
his mother tongue, the German original of his report readily shows
that he did not quite master this

49

language at the time, and his sentence
construction is marked by Yiddish turns of phrase more so than is the
case today. He continues:

"I helped a lot with the construction
of the bunkers and the fortification lines. We had fantastic bunker
constructions.

"My rank was not so much that of
strategic expert as technical export."

Military historians can confirm that no
Polish partisans anywhere within the German sphere of influence were
able to engage the German troops in positional warfare (making
bunkers unnecessary). We may readily agree with Wizenthal that he is
no expert on strategy. However, we can also doubt his technical
expertise for lack of any subject qualifications on his part.

One thing is for certain: he lied. This is
proven by a considerable number of affidavits which he has sworn
since then, to other effects.

In the statement at hand, Wizenthal
continues: "From October 6, 1943 until mid-February 19441 was a
partisan. "

Unfortunately our criminal hoaxer's American
backers prevented him from maintaining this adventuresome invention.
Regardless how much the OSI's Nazi-hunters may have appreciated
Wizenthal's willingness to fib and lie, they forced our pompous
peacock out of his officer-and-partisan dreams and back to reality,
which appears in another one of the perjurer's sworn affidavits
(August 24, 1954, Linz) as follows:

"On October 17, 1943, just before the
Lemberg camp was dissolved, I escaped from the camp and hid in the
barn of some acquaintances near Lemberg. On January 13, 1944, when
the SD and the Gestapo combed the area, I was discovered and put into
the Gestapo prison `Lacki' in Lemberg..."

So Wizenthal lied under oath in 1948 and
deliberately gave false information about the time of his
persecution.

Wizenthal's "flight" did not last from
October 6, 1943 until mid-February 1944, and it also did not lead him
to the romantic camp fires of Polish partisans, but rather directly
into a Polish peasant's barn - without any meteoric military career
or promotions.

A hay loft, therefore, was our heroic
wannabe-Major's hiding place - but he did not have to bide there
until mid-February to be discovered by the Gestapo; he was already
apprehended on January 13 of that same year.

But to return to Wizenthal's statement from
1948, where he states (in the original document in Yiddish-German
hodgepodge):

"In February our group was surrounded.
It would have been hopeless to stay there, for the Germans came
closer on all sides. One night we decided to divide into as many
groups as possible, by splitting up. I commanded 80 people. We
managed to get through, and we got to Lemberg in groups
of

50

four."(In actual fact
Wizenthal spent that time snuggled down in the hay loft of the town
that was not Lemberg, and he commanded Wizenthal and no-one else.)

"We entered a Pole's residence, with
pistols drawn, where we took some civilian clothing and went on, for
safety's sake only two at a time, and 40 m back, the next two."
(Wizenthal cannot actually be charged for the armed robbery
described here. After all, he really was elsewhere at the time. In
the hay loft.)

In Interrogation 2820 Wizenthal reports on
his apprehension by the German authorities. Stylistically speaking,
this sentence is reminiscent of a Karl May novel:

"Our situation was such that we
couldn't even use the weapons. We were underneath the floorboards,
squeezed like into a coffin. When the Gestapo was in the front yard
of our house it was already too late to make any sort of
preparations."

If he had been discovered armed in his
hiding place it would have taken a miracle to save him from
legitimate, on-the-spot execution - regardless which of the armed
powers of the Second World War had discovered him in this condition.

Wehrmacht War Crimes"

Interrogation 2820, Szymon Wizenthal's
affidavit examined here, was recorded by the American secret service
at that time with the intention of obtaining statements regarding the
"criminal deeds", not of the SS (they had already collected enough
"eyewitness testimony" in that regard), but of the German Wehrmacht
as a whole. Question I 1 was thus quite unambiguous:

"As I already told you at the start of
our first interrogation, we are interested first and foremost in
things pertaining to the Wehrmacht."

To which Wizenthal replied with a simple
"yes" - whispered with a modest blush, for all we know.
Interrogating officer Ponger thus pressed on with Question 12:

"That's why it is important that you
tell us things primarily having to do with the Wehrmacht, and we can
have a separate talk about run-ins you had with the SS."

Wizenthal had already understood: he knew
what it was they wanted to hear from him. The aim was now to run down
the Wehrmacht as much as possible and to impute to it - not to the SS
- those crimes that fit the American strategy of that time. Of course
Wizenthal had no way of knowing

51

that only shortly following this protocol,
American policy regarding Germany would dispense once and for all
with the Morgenthau Plan which had guided American strategy up until
then.

And he probably also failed to consider that
his testimony might one day become public and be compared with his
later statements.

Wizenthal launched into his recital with
gusto: to make the accommodating nature of his response to the
American officer's wishes more visible, I have taken the liberty of
capitalizing his subsequent references to the German Wehrmacht:

"On June 29-30, 1941, Lemberg was
occupied by the GERMAN WEHRMACHT.. Many GERMAN SOLDIERS participated
in the persecutions, which I observed from the window of my home...
We went to the window and saw how MEMBERS OF THE WEHRMACHT, along
with civilians,... accosted Jews in the street... and severely abused
then..

"...Later I saw a group of Jews...
coming from a side street, being abused by the WEHRMACHT..

"Just at this time a car drove up,
MEMBERS OF THE WEHRMACHT were in it, I think it was a Mercedes, an
open-top car in which a GERMAN GENERAL stood, he had golden
epaulettes and beside him stood a cinema operator with a camera, and
he filmed these scenes...

"The Jews mostly died in the first few
days when the GERMAN SOLDIERS visited the streets where the Jews
lived..

"During this work the Jews were beaten
most bloody by the MEMBERS OF THE WEHRMACHT who supervised the
work.

"... We continued slowly down the
street, because again, more Jews were brought out of all the houses
by the WEHRMACHT.

"We had to go through a line-up and
almost every one of us was kicked or whipped.

"QUESTION: That was also by the
WEHRAlACHT? "

ANSWER: Yes."

(Of course Wizenthal later had to amend
these orgies of violence which he happily imputed to the Wehrmacht
here; on page 8 of his book Justice Not Vengeance he
truthfully attributes these massacres to the Ukrainians and
cautiously paraphrases the restoration of order by the German troops
by describing them as a little less trigger-happy.)

Like every informant, Wizenthal is fond of
the phrase, "Please, sir, I know something!"

"... I also know something about the
role the WEHRMACHT played in 1943...

52

"Where a senior paymaster... from
Tyrol very often carried out executions on his own
initiative...

"QUESTION: Do you have any first-hand
knowledge of how the WEHRMACHT combated guerrilla warfare?"

(And without hesitating, our perjurious liar
told of his "experiences" in this matter, made during his imaginary
stint as partisan.)

"ANSWER: One time we had two men, that
was in January 1944, one of them was Tannenbaum and the second man's
name was Schwindel, he was sent into the neighboring town... These
two fellows were picked up, and we found them two days later, their
eyes had been gouged out and their tongues cut out, and one of them,
you know, his private parts had been treated, probably with
wire...

"... a... group of us once freed three
hostages who had been taken prisoner by a GROUP OF WEHRMACHT MEN...
and this chamber had a temperature of more than 50 C [120 Fl. We
found these three in a state as though they had been boiled One of
them still lived for five days...

"QUESTION: Did you have any further
contact with the WEHRMACHT after that?

"ANSWER: Not after that. Only on the
transport.. the soldiers abused us. "

When the American Imperium decided to
introduce a currency reform in West Germany and, under pressure from
the escalating Cold War, to mobilize the western part of Germany
against Communism, the need for false witnesses against the German
soldiery as a whole evaporated. Wizenthal realized this immediately
and proceeded to focus his accusations, with few exceptions, on the
SS and the Gestapo instead. However, the perjurious crook made an
embarrassing faux pas. In the transcript here at issue, Interrogation
2820 from the National Archives in Washington DC, 20408, he replied
to Question 15:

"We were hauled out of our hiding
place, taken to a car, and slapped. "

"QUESTION 16: By the SS?

"ANSWER: No, by the Security Police. I
immediately slit my wrist. "

In his eagerness to witness to "German
crimes" for the American secret service officer, Wizenthal obviously
did not consider that political developments might deprive this
account of its usefulness so quickly. In 1954, in his "Affidavit
About the Time of My Persecution", our anti-German calumniator had
already adapted his account to these new developments: it was no
longer the Wehrmacht, nor even the Security Police, but rather the SS
whom he accused of mistreating him. He now describes the same event
thus:

53

"On January 13, 1944, when the SD and
the Gestapo combed the area, I was discovered, and put into the
Gestapo prison `Lacki' in Lemberg, where I was tortured terribly by
Unterscharführer Waldtke. To put in end to these tortures I slit
my wrists. Although it was somewhat unusual.. "

Indeed, what Wizenthal expects us to believe
here is rather unusual.

Now, all of a sudden, Wizenthal - after
being discovered as armed partisan - was no longer slapped by the
Security Police or the Wehrmacht, after which he slit his wrists; no,
he was now "tortured" terribly by an "Unterscharführer ".

It is quite clear that the orders of his
American superiors had been changed to exclude the German Wehrmacht
(whose exemplary conduct in war was also known to large parts of the
German population in Austria and the Federal Republic of Germany)
from false claims of criminal behavior, and to focus such claims
instead on the SS.

But Wizenthal forgot that in his
Interrogation 2820 of May 27, 1948 (see above) he had clearly denied
being tortured by the "SS", and had made the Security Police
responsible instead. That the Security Police never included the rank
of "Unterscharführer", and that this rank was restricted
to the SS, is something which any child would have known in those
days. The fact that Wizenthal was unclear on the rank and wholly
ignorant of the name of his alleged tormentor when he assigned him in
1948 to the Security Police, but that he suddenly "remembers" his
name and rank several years later when he transfers him to the SS in
compliance with propagandistic necessity, is a feature characteristic
not only of the satanic old liar himself, but - as we shall see
repeatedly in this book - also of the entire troop of false witnesses
under his directorship: the professional false witnesses Rosenberg
and Epstein - who, half a century after the end of the war, in the
course of the Demjanjuk trial (see chapter The Demjanjuk Case),
"identified" a man whom they had not even known, or had declared
dead 40 years earlier - also testified to events and "positively
identified" defendants with whom they had had no acquaintance at all
in 1945, and displayed such retroactive "knowledge" or "recognition"
whenever trial tactics required it.

Wizenthal incriminates his saviors: False
affidavits against Ganthert and Kohlrautz.

In Wizenthal's book Justice Not
Vengeance, analyzed here, Wizenthal informs us that two German
Nazi Party members repeatedly saved his life. In the foreword, on
page 9, Peter Michael Lingens writes:

54

"The eastern railway repair shops came
under the control of a German railway official called Heinrich
Guentherl. Wiesenlhal's immediate superior was likewise a German,
Chief Inspector Adolf Kohlrautz. Both of them were Nazis .... Within
their own sphere... they saw to it strictly that the Jews were
treated fairly."

If Wizenthal was constantly treated and
hospitalized and operated on correctly by the Germans in whose sphere
of influence he stayed, one must ask oneself where in the world he
could have found his inspiration for the murderous deeds he
describes? It can't have been during his stint as partisan Major!

Wizenthal was not always as full of praise
for the two men and their "strict" maintenance of order as he was in
his latest book. In his aforementioned "Affidavit About the Time of
My Persecution" of August 24, 1954 he incriminated his life-savers
severely. He wrote:

"My immediate superior was senior
inspector Adolf KohlrautZ... The head of the repair works was senior
Reichsbahn councillor Günthert. While working in these repair
shops I was hit several times... by senior inspector Arnolds, as well
as by inspector Lindner."

We do not know what may have prompted Szymon
Wizenthal to correct the patently false picture which he had painted
in 1954 of the conditions in the eastern rail works of Lemberg and
the "abusive German rail officials". The fact is, however, that as
early as 1965 the role played by senior inspector Günthert had
become positively transformed in Wizenthal's recollections, to such a
degree that he even deemed it appropriate to invite Günthert to
his daughter Paulinka's wedding (JNV p. 10).

Faced with the choice of accepting the
invitation to the wedding at Wizenthal House, or risking prosecution
for "crimes against humanity" on the basis of the 1954 "Affidavit
About the Time of My Persecution", the exsenior inspector of the
Reich German Railway probably considered the former to be the lesser
of two evils.

And it wasn't a bad deal for Wizenthal
either, since he needed to ensure Günthert's silence to uphold
his legend of having spent the years from 1941 to 1944 in
concentration camps.

Wizenthal not in concentration camp until
1944.

Here too, the old charlatan gives himself
away. In his Linz "affidavit" he stated:

55

"Already on July 10, 1941 the Labor
Office (Jewish Employment) had forcibly assigned me to clearing
operations with the railway in Lemberg.. Later I and a group of about
150 Jews... were assigned to work on the Eastern railway... Our meals
were brought to us from the concentration camp... In mid-1943... our
group was transferred back into the forced-labor camp Lemberg, which
had meanwhile been converted into a concentration camp."

So if we chose to believe at least these
details from this affidavit, Szymon Wizenthal had not been in
concentration camps ever since 1941 (as he had avowed in numerous
other sworn statements), but rather was put maliciously to work by
the Labor Office.

That, of course, is something this sluggard
can never forgive and forget.

In this document Szymon Wizenthal confirms
it himself: up until the time where, according to official accounts,
the "gassing of the Jews" had already been stopped and the "gas
chambers" were blasted, he had been at relative liberty (placed by
the Labor Office, and paid in accordance with Reich German social
legislation), and the only thing he got from the camp kitchen was
food. One wonders how such a fate agrees with the theory of National
Socialist genocide.

One wonders this all the more since
Wizenthal was not the only Jew to enjoy such special treatment: in
fact - as he himself points out - the majority of the laborers with
the eastern railway were Jews, who were thus able to spend the worst
years of the war in safety and with job security, in an area where
Wizenthal himself states that "strict" care was taken "that the Jews
were treated fairly".

It would be difficult to imagine a worse
land mine against the "Holocaust" than that which Wizenthal set with
his Linz "affidavit" of 1954. (See Document, p. )

In a matter of love's labors lost,
Wizenthal's lackey and ex-secretary Peter Michael Lingens, author of
the preface to the book Justice Not Vengeance, invents a
concentration camp "Janowska" (p. 11) as setting for Wizenthal's 1941
"fate of persecution", evidently in order to allow his lord and
master to take at least a sideline part, as it were, in the Jews'
fate and the horrors of their alleged genocide. But the very attempt
is pathetic; all we are told is that the Wizenthal couple remained
together and was even posted jointly to the same place of employment
- a boon which real concentration camp inmates were not granted.

The March 1, 1945 document from the
International Tracing Service at Arolsen, reprinted here on p. ,
tears down Lingens' house of cards and shows clearly that the "Nazi
hunter" had never seen a concentration camp, much

56

less an "extermination camp", from the
inside prior to the evacuation of Lemberg, in other words during the
time of the alleged extermination of the Jews.

It goes without saying that Wizenthal cannot
have made the acquaintance of any of the 12 concentration camps which
he expects us to believe in, and for which there were only 14 months
(March 1944 to May 1945) left for him to visit. He would have had to
tour a new concentration camp every five weeks.

Summary.

Szymon Wizenthal's statement of May 27, 1948
(Interrogation 2820, copied on May 28, 1985 by the Chief of the
Reference Service Branch of The National Archives, Washington DC
20408) was made under oath, as per the transcript:

"I swear by God the Almighty and
All-Knowing that I will tell the truth, without exception and without
addition, so help me God."

Bound by this oath, Wizenthal proceeded to
testify to a number of severe German war crimes which he claims to
have witnessed in the course of his 13 weeks' partisan activity in
the forests of Poland - even though in his sworn affidavit of August
24, 1954 he had abbreviated his "fate of persecution" to a nine
weeks' flight that led him, not into the tents of Polish partisans,
but into a Polish peasant's hay loft.

All the war crimes of the German Wehrmacht
to which Wizenthal attests on the wishes and urging of the American
interrogation officer in 1948 are exposed by Wizenthal's 1954 Linz
affidavit as perjurious lies.

Anyone is free to call Wizenthal a
perjurious liar. In fact, that seems to me to be a general public
obligation.

What is more, the 1954 Linz "affidavit"
discussed here shows clearly that Wizenthal escaped the Jews' "fate
of persecution" in the Third Reich, in the sense that up until the
time where the alleged "gas chambers" were blasted he had not been
confined to any concentration camps, but rather had worked for the
eastern railway, posted there by the Labor Office and remunerated
accordingly by the Reichsbahn. This idyll was destroyed only by the
advancing Red Army and nothing else.

The "Holocaust" suffers its most devastating
setback precisely through this: the exposure of the lies and
dishonesty of its most efficient advocate.

The rogues' gallery of professional
informants: from Wizenthal to Neugebauer and
Weinzierl.

The Waechter case is a matter of a small
mistake made on April 2, 1992. A harmless case, since it did not end
fatally, like other cases in which Wizenthal is involved - but it may
be "harmless" in this sense only because the innocent victim,
Director of the State Opera Eberhard Waechter, had already died of
cardiac arrest before Wizenthal and his accomplices struck. But the
methods that were applied here - the principle of collective
responsibility that blames innocent sons for their fathers' alleged
guilt - the principle of original sin, in other words - were used in
this case, just as were the other characteristic elements of
Wizenthal's criminal "hunting methods".

To summarize the case briefly: on April 2,
1992, two days after his sudden death, the late Director of the
Vienna State Opera, Eberhard Waechter, was accused in the periodical
Wirtschaftswoche of having been the son of a murdered National
Socialist named Baron Waechter. In fact, the late Director was no
relation to the Baron in question, but rather a member of a family
that had opposed National Socialism.

This seemingly trite attack on a
just-deceased and his grieving kin might be dismissed as a minor
gaffe on the part of Austrian pack journalists - if it were not so
highly significant in terms of the exposure of methodology and
below-the-surface interconnections. For one, the first thing we find
when the shine a light into this rats' nest of manhunting and
fabrication of history are all the itinerant preachers of anti-German
hate, of the "Holocaust" and of German sole and collective guilt, in
happy harmony with their silent interconnections:

First in the line-up is P.M.L. who, writing
in Wirtschaftswoche of April 15, 1992, urged the journalist
Khittl (who had acted on P.M.L.'s orders in researching
against the deceased and then launching the political strike) to
please explain his embarrassing error and to extricate himself and
his backer (P.M.L. himself) from this dirty slander affair.

Hiding behind the modest abbreviation P.M.L.
we find an old acquaintance from Wizenthal's slander team, namely the
Jewish journalist with Austrian citizenship, that venerable voice of
Israeli Near-East politics in Austria, Peter Michael Lingens.
Since what is at issue here is a case of slander, it's no great
surprise that this P.M.L. is the same as Szymon Wizenthal's
ex-secretary P.M.L. He is also the same P.M.L. who authored the
preface to Szymon's last book Money And vengeance - pardonme, I

61

moant Justice Not Vengeance. And here
we have already arrived in the thick of Szymon's Viennese "one-man
office", since Mother Lingens is one of Szymon's most assiduous
witnesses; in countless trials she knew exactly what testimony was
desired (after she "miraculously" survived, of course), and in
Wizenthal's book Justice Not Vengeance she is also called upon
time and again to grace the witness stand of Szymonean False News. In
the case at hand, however, the flunky P.M.L. sacrifices his backers
by permitting his henchman, the journalist Khittl, to name the
wire-pullers behind the Waechter campaign. Admittedly this resulted
in voices being raised in warning, such as that of the "colleague
from the Standard' - a paper published by the Jewish
newspaperman Oskar Bronner and repeatedly praised by Szymon; this
"colleague" suggests that it is an extremely "touchy" matter to make
reference to the "anti-Fascist institutions" and "personalities"
(that stand behind them), since doing so might endanger their work
(i.e. their professional lying).

From the accounts of the Wirtschaftswoche
it then follows that the "colleague from the Standard, in
her own account, twists the facts to shove all the blame into the
shoes of P.M.L.'s henchman, the journalist Khittl. And he,
bitten by the dogs from every side, bites back.

In this way we learn the path of the Lie -
and this path is identical to the "interconnections" of Szymon's
hunting party:

1. The Jewish editor-in-chief Professor L.
O. Meysel, ex-chief of the Wirtschaftswoche, claims that
Director of the State Opera Eberhard Waechter is the son of Baron O.
Waechter (who had been murdered by anti-Fascists while trying to
flee). This leads to accusations against Eberhard Waechter in matters
of "the climate and politics of culture". Of course! After all,
sonnyboy must be punished for daddy's beliefs. Or so restitution
fraud Wizenthal says.

Meysel bases his claims on "research" and
discussions with

2. Szymon Wizenthal, and thus the
trail leads directly to our Restitution Fraud. Oddly, this is not
enough for Khittl. Instead, he refuses to rest until he has
exposed all the accomplices in this campaign of incitement and lies
to the shocked eyes of society: and since neither the Communists nor
the CIA may be lacking in this brew, the so-called "Documentary
Archives of the Austrian Resistance", which may be considered a link
between the KGB and the CIA (cf. pages , f.), must also be dragged in
- and indeed it is,

3. in the form of the Communist
"Professor" Herbert Steiner, an alleged "expert" in "matters
of contemporary history", who insists tirelessly that Director
Waechter is identical to the son of Baron Waechter, the National
Socialist murdered by anti-Fascists.

62

And to complete the rogues' gallery of
informants against the people, Fatherland and fellow man, it is also
necessary to mention Steiner's successor in the ranks of the
Documentary Archives of the Austrian Resistance, namely

4. Dr. Wolfgang Neugebauer. This degenerate
son of a very decent former soldier of the Waffen-SS has personally
brought about 600 criminal charges against his fellow citizens for
their political convictions. Beyond that, he has written numerous
letters behind the backs of "offensive" persons in order to discredit
them with their employers and cause them to lose their jobs.

Like his predecessors and colleagues, he is
deaf and dumb to the crimes committed by the Communists and Western
Allies, and his loyalty to the policies of the American Imperium is
obvious. We have Neugebauer to thank for the fact that we are aware
of the racially motivated anti-German hatred espoused by this clique:
after all, Neugebauer's "Documentary Archives" (cf. p. f.)
retrospectively approved Morgenthau's planned genocide (the so-called
Morgenthau Plan, which provided for the political destruction of
Germany and the physical destruction of the German people) and
expressed regrets that this plan was not in fact implemented,
considering the economic power of the current Federal Republic of
Germany. Similarly, Neugebauer still supports the cession of
one-third of Carinthia to the partisan regime of the Communist
dictator Marshal Tito, and has no regrets for all the murderous
consequences of that cession.

When the mendacious campaign of Wizenthal's
minions began after the State Opera Director's passing, and the
grieving kin protested and pointed out that there was a mix-up,
Khittl turned to

5. Professor Weinzierl of the University of
Vienna's Institute for Contemporary History. Where bias and the
misrepresentation of history are concerned, this Institute -
established by the victorious Allies and originally named the
Institute for the Prosecution of Nazi War Criminals - is
second worldwide only to the Institute for Contemporary History in
Munich, which has similar objectives. Both "Institutes" have been
unable to discover even one American or Communist crime in the time
period which they were created to embellish with serviceable tales.
In an article published in the Wochenpresse (Vienna, January
1, 1988), Ms. Weinzierl actually portrayed herself as a liar and
forger, and has had to bear these labels meekly ever since.

As usual in Austria where anti-German
incitement is concerned; she was also able to indulge in this little
pastime with impunity, claiming that the "Sudeten Germans" had only
themselves to blame for what happened to

63

them after 1945 (the bestial murder of
300,000 innocent men, women and children and the expulsion of three
million of them). Her tendency towards lying, her criminal
Germanophobia, and her support for collective guilt and the bloody
vengeance exacted on innocent women and children marks Madam
Professor Weinzierl as a true daughter of the Wizenthalian Mind-Set.

So let's summarize: with the aid of his
ex-secretary, Wizenthal has instigated a campaign in whose course
defamatory claims were made against a deceased. This campaign drew
support from persons and organizations which advocate and approve the
doctrine of collective guilt and the collective responsibility of
innocent persons, Germanophobia, and our country's population with
foreigners (a la the Morgenthau Plan's "alteration of the German
national character"), and all of which also are utterly uncritical of
the human rights violations committed by the Israeli state and the
American Imperium. The Waechter case opened the doors on a
continent-spanning, eerie landscape of fraud and a worldwide manhunt
whose vanguard consistently takes the form of a "media campaign".

The clear and definite aim of these
activities is to criminalize, and to portray in propagandistically
one-sided and negative fashion, the history of the German people in
their struggle for their economic and moral place in the world, from
the beginning of the First World War to their heroic battle to
realize their right to self-determination - in other words, the
German people's revolt between 1914 and 1945 - as well as,
concurrently, to work towards their present-day physical eradication
by advocating a policy of forced "compensatory immigration" coupled
with the simultaneous approval of a below-threshold German birth
rate.

In the time immediately after the Second
World War, the prosecutors from the Allied Inquisition as a rule
avoided imputing individual crimes to members of the German camp
guards. Such charges were more likely to be brought against the
so-called "Kapos" (overseers), in other words inmates who had been
assigned by the camp administration to a special position with
certain powers. And in fact I am aware of reliable accounts (Dr.
Benedikt Kautsky) showing that in many cases this Kapo system
resulted in inmates (criminals in particular) misusing such a
position to commit violence against fellow inmates.

Imputing such crimes to the SS was
considered inexpedient because it was well known that, on the one
hand, the German laws prohibited such excesses and that, on the
other, the proverbial discipline within the National Socialist state
and its executive branch, particularly the SS, by far exceeded that
of all the armed formations of the other nations involved in the
Second World War.

This is also why the charges in the
so-called "gas chamber trials" focused on this essential aspect:
namely, that the German recipients of the genocidal orders had
obeyed these orders out of a mistaken sense of obedience and
participated in an "industrial-style genocide" sanctioned by these
orders, and that they had subordinated their human concerns to this
obedience and military discipline.

Numerous trial files had also been found
which proved that the Third Reich punished excesses committed by SS
camp guards - and by members of the SS as a whole and the Waffen-SS
in particular - with merciless severity such as no army or armed
formation from the other warring powers was prepared to apply to
similar violators from their own ranks.

As case in point, American soldiers in
Dachau (see illustrations, pp. ff.) were allowed to take hundreds of
SS guards who had surrendered with a clear conscience, line them up
along the wall, mow them down with machine gun fire and hand the
wounded and dying over to the concentration camp inmates for
lynching, without the perpetrators (who were known by name) ever
being taken to court or even reprimanded.

National Socialist Germany acted very
differently: in this context I refer first to the orders issued by
SS-Standartenführer Glücks and concentration camp
inspector Eicke (see illustration, p.) who repeatedly reinforced this
for

68

the units under their command by means of
examples of the punishment of violators, and who stressed the
consequences of any such violation.

Wizenthal himself tells us of a strange
incident which rules out any tolerance of attacks on inmates in the
Third Reich and which, moreover, also casts doubt on the "officially
decreed extermination of the Jews". He repeatedly tells us (for
example in his affidavit of August 24, 1954) that the middle toe of
his right foot was crushed when a fellow inmate threw a rock.
Wizenthal reports:

"Coincidence would have it that a
high-ranking visitor was in the camp, and so I was taken to the
sick-bay where... I was operated That saved my life."

The fact that the high-ranking visit was not
someone from New York but was rather an inspection conducted by the
highest leadership ranks follows from the context as well as from
other accounts Wizenthal has given of the same event.

If we are to believe him in this instance,
this would mean in any case that the National Socialist leadership
had insisted on the proper treatment and medical care of the Jewish
inmates. Not on their extermination.

SS police tribunal punishes acts of
violence.

Wizenthal has thoughtfully provided us with
an account (JNV p. 261) of a court decision whereby one Max Taubner
was sentenced on July 9, 1943 to a ten-year prison term for excesses
he had committed against Jews. Naturally, given Szymon's propensity
for lying, and faced with the necessity of making the Third Reich's
severity in dealing with individual crimes seem less than
above-board, Wizenthal does not quote the SS police tribunal's
verdict against Max Taubner verbatim, but rather, as he himself puts
it, "almost verbatim":

"Especially as.. he had allowed
himself to get swept away `into atrocities unworthy of a
German and an SS leader.' Germans murdered cleanly."

That the last sentence is not a quote from
the police protocol in question, but rather a product of Wizenthal's
sick mind, goes without saying.

69

Far less "clean", however, is the abundance
of individual and allegedly entirely public murders which Wizenthal
imputes in his book to all those he chooses to hunt. These people are
said to have indulged their trigger-happiness with abandon and
high-caliber weapons, without care or even a silencer, like Mexican
gangster bosses in a spaghetti western - in railway stations, on the
open streets, in Reich railway coup6s, in the streets and squares of
the National Socialist sphere of influence.

It is depressing that this kind of court
file continues to be kept inaccessible to researchers and is left to
fragmentary interpretation at best, and at the mercy of the no more
than "almost verbatim" presentation of the likes of Szymon Wizenthal.

Himmler's chief legal
adviser.

On page 264 of JNV Szymon Wizenthal
introduces to us Dr. Horst Bender, the man who had served as legal
adviser to the Reichsführer-SS, Himmler, and who in this
capacity had drawn up the legislation which governed the guard
personnel in the concentration camps. Wizenthal quotes "verbatim":

"In the case of self-seeking or
sadistic, or sexual, motives [for the murder of Jews] there
shall be punishment by a court, in certain instances also for murder
or manslaughter."

Unfortunately we are again dependent on
Wizenthal's unreliable, out-of-context account and are barred from
examining these files first-hand. But we do learn that when Wizenthal
tried to drag Dr. Bender into court 33 years later, he stood firmly
by the guidelines he had drawn up so long ago. Dr. Bender was
acquitted and continues to work as attorney in the Federal Republic
of Germany.

Wizenthal admits: by law,
Jewish forced laborers had to be treated correctly.

Here Wizenthal tells us (JNV p. 368)
about a German Oberleutnant by the name of Johann Kroupa and
portrays him as one of those men who "demonstrated that it was
possible even for a German soldier to behave decently". Wizenthal
errs: not only Johann Kroupa, but ten million other German soldiers
as well, all behaved decently.

Wizenthal reports that when city commandant
Oberleutnant Kroupa learned that forced laborers were being
harassed or beaten by the SS or

70

Ukrainian escorts, he immediately put a stop
to this. (I am certain that any such excesses were committed
exclusively by the Ukrainian escorts and that the SS does not figure
in the relevant trial files - which are also being kept from the
public.)

In any case, a Ukrainian officer by the name
of Dr. Stroncickij brought charges against the German Oberleutnant
for "favoring Germans". The case was examined and Oberleutnant
Kroupa was acquitted. Dr. Stroncickij, on the other hand, was
turned over to the Gestapo and imprisoned in a concentration camp.
The fact that Wizenthal, whom we have to thank for this account of
the juridical realities in National Socialist Germany, tries later on
to devalue Dr. Stroncickij's arrest with the addition of
undocumentable fairy tales fails to spoil his account of the legal
situation in the Third Reich.

Another anecdote from Wizenthal's pen is
also an embarrassment to the "Holocaust".

In his report to the "National Archives,
Washington DC 20408" Wizenthal recounts that a group of 109 Jews owed
their lives to the circumstance that 70 SS men assigned to guard them
did not wish to go to the front, anti did not shoot their prisoners
so that they might have some reason to give their superiors to
justify why they remained behind the frontlines. Wizenthal's report
states:

"We were a group of 109 men, and more
than 70 men [guardsl were there, and for as long as we were there
the SS did not have to go to the, front."

Surely the only thing this can possibly mean
is that the SS guards' orders were to guard living Jews -
since otherwise their superiors, who were well aware of the need for
manpower at the front, would have insisted on the immediate
liquidation of the prisoners!

Why does Wizenthal need the "individual
murder"?

In view of the juridical situation in the
Third Reich we must ask this in all seriousness. After all, the
unrestrained individual murders which Wizenthal consistently imputes
to his victims bring with them the danger that, despite the fact that
most actual witnesses have since passed on, other persons might
interrupt his drama with facts which could prove that

71

incidents such as he alleges simply could
not have been possible, given the everyday realities of those times.

Wizenthal takes that risk. Only a few years
after the end of the war it had already turned out that the charges
against members of the German executive accused of the emotionless
carrying-out of criminal orders (murder of thousands or hundreds of
thousands) did not suffice to ensure the required convictions and the
hoped-for degree of punishment - partly because the judges and juries
were difficult to sway emotionally with such abstract figures, and
partly because the responsibility borne for the alleged mass murders
by an individual working within an overall hierarchy was difficult to
establish by means of eyewitness testimony. Another factor was that
in the various gas chamber trials, that minority of SS-men in
particular who had "confessed to the existence of the gas chambers"
had been acquitted or sentenced to minor prison terms, with reference
to their obligation to act under orders (even if the defendants had
admitted contributing to the crime themselves).

The newspaper Die Welt of November
14, 1988 quotes Wizenthal aptly in this context:

"100 dead are a tragedy. One million
dead are a statistic. So I said to myself we must look for the
small-scale murderers, the ones that killed 20, or 25. That's
something that people will understand. A tree says more than a
forest."

To summarize: Wizenthal's contribution of
the last few decades has been to facilitate a Renaissance for the
American Imperium's anti-German propaganda in regard to the so-called
"war crimes trials" by creating a new trial strategy, namely the
individual public murder committed by the SS leaders for their
personal gratification, and to maintain this strategy in perfect
working order by means of his seemingly inexhaustible supply of
witnesses (even though the same old names crop up time and again).

The testimonies provided by Wizenthal's
witnesses - who boast an utterly incredible understanding of service
ranks and command structures, as well as "powers of recollection"
that fly in the face of all juridical experience - are not even
remotely reflective of the legal realities in National Socialist
everyday life and the iron laws and jurisdiction to which the SS was
subject.

The proven perjured testimony of
Wizenthal's troop of witnesses, recruited worldwide from the scum of
the Diaspora; the suppression in German courts of all Jewish
witnesses who were willing to testify in a manner inconvenient to the
Wizenthal Agenda; and the actual facts of the legal situation in the
Third Reich - taken together, these combine to a likelihood bordering
on certainty that not a single one of the

Like all "war criminals", John Demjanjuk
was a loving family man, appreciated and respected by his employer
and neighbors, when the false witnesses from the Wizenthal Mafia came
knocking at his door. In 1986, after the usual introductory ritual of
a media campaign, this Ukrainian-American with a previously spotless
record was extradited by an American court to stand trial in Israel
for the murder of hundreds of thousands of inmates in Treblinka
(where he had never been). At the time of his extradition the
"evidence" (the SS ID card) on which his charges and the subsequent
death sentence were to be based did not yet exist. This "evidence"
was only later to be ordered from Moscow, in writing, by Elie Wiesel,
the "Nobel Peace Prize" laureate whom Professor Robert Faurisson has
exposed as notorious liar and propaganda advocate of the
destruction-by-immigration of the closed German settlement region.
(See Rullmann, Der Fall Demjanjuk, pp. 88, 94.)

In the well-known show trial ritual John
Demjanjuk was charged with crimes he allegedly committed in Treblinka
(500,000 to one million murders) as "Ivan the Terrible", and was
sentenced to death by an Israeli court on the basis of testimony from
witnesses known for decades to be perjurers. But first his lawyer,
who had noticed the forgery and was working to expose it,
conveniently fell out of the window of his fifthfloor hotel room.

When Hans Peter Rullmann wrote his book
Der Fall Demjanjuk, he did not yet know that the Federal
Criminal Police Office in Wiesbaden would expose John Demjanjuk's
service ID, which identified him as a member of the SS guards of
Treblinka, to be a KGB forgery. Rullmann also could not know that.
the Jewish newspaper SemitTimes would speak out on behalf of
Demjanjuk, the innocent man wrongly sentenced to death, and that its
editor Abraham Melzer would personally appeal to the American
President George Bush. And Rullmann also could not have known that in
June 1992, as per an Austrian radio broadcast, the United States
would demand Demjanjuk's return. Nonetheless, this thoroughly
researched book by Hans Peter Rullmann - a journalist who has worked
for the German weekly news magazine Der Spiegel and several
German daily newspapers and radio stations and who is above any
suspicion of "right-wing radical" views - exposed, compellingly and
for the first time ever, the collaboration and the organizational
structure of a world-spanning system for procuring false witnesses.

77

The witness Epstein.

One of the witness Pinhas Epstein's
particularly shocking tales was piped around the world with media
aid, and must have moved millions to tears.

"One time a little girl, no more than
twelve years old, came back out of the gas chamber alive. She cried
for her mother."It took Epstein some time to describe
this satanic deed, for he was visibly devastated: "Ivan ordered
a prisoner to rape the child and then shoot her." After this
statement the witness collapsed behind a huge handkerchief, into
which he sobbed.

As he faced the alleged mass murderer in
person now, he struggled in vain for words to describe the man who
"laughed when he saw dead bodies": "I can find no words, no
description for him. There is nothing in the world to compare him
to."Ivan Demjanjuk, that is the devil who ordered one
young girl, who cried for her mother, to lie down on her back:
"Then he forced a young prisoner to rape the girl. The prisoner
lay down on the girl, but lie couldn't do it So Ivan shot the
girl."

Thus went one of the numerous accounts
dramatically presented to the Israeli court by false witness Pinhas
Epstein.

It is characteristic for this, as for all
other trials starring Wizenthal's mafia of false witnesses, that this
professional perjurer with decades of experience can clearly remember
the alleged tormentor's name, rank and appearance - while not knowing
the names of the victims, his fellow prisoners.

Once again, all the realities of everyday
concentration camp life in Hitler's Germany are dismissed as the
stage production focuses on the public murder of a child.

Epstein knew nothing of gas
chambers.

Rullmann writes on p. 163:

"A majority of the claims about
Treblinka comes from Rosenberg and Epstein. The only thing is,
Epstein says nothing at all in his affidavit that would indicate the
existence of gas chambers. He speaks about thousands of Jews who were
allegedly abused and killed in Treblinka: all of them he says, were
shot - murdered individually and sadistically.

78

"Considering this affidavit of
Epstein's - made many years ago - one cannot help the impression that
either there were no gas chambers in Treblinka at all, or else he did
not know of them... "

As an aside, according to the affidavit he
swore after the end of the war, Epstein himself was not in the
so-called "camp of the dead" where the gassings allegedly took place,
so that his statement of having seen a girl come back out of the gas
chamber alive cannot possibly have been true. In this context I again
remind the reader that allegations of individual excesses were
dispensed with in the immediate post-War war crimes trials dealing
with "mass murders" in the Third Reich. Evidently this was because
there were still too many people alive back then who were all too
aware of the iron discipline governing the SS in particular, and
which virtually ruled out any individual murders and brutalities. The
professional witnesses' "recollections" of this kind of "individual"
crime frequently did not begin until later - obviously for reasons of
trial strategy (cf. Wizenthal, JNV p. 168).

Rullmann continues on p. 164:

"To the German court dealing with the
crimes in Treblinka, Epstein was such a fishy witness that the court
dispensed with swearing him in. The verdict reached in the German
Treblinka trials even excluded Epstein's testimony.

"Nonetheless Epstein is now the second
most important witness against Ivan Demjanjuk, whom he now, after
more than 40 years, claims to recognize by the way he moves. Yet in
all his earlier depositions, Epstein completely forgot' the role that
this 'Ivan the Terrible' allegedly played: this Ivan was never before
mentioned by Epstein at all, not even in passing."

It is clear that the professional
international pack of perjurers whore Israel and the United States
have for decades deployed in order to foster the anti-German
propaganda adjust their "powers of recollection" to the requirements
of the Israeli trial rituals.

The witness Rosenberg.

Rullmann writes on p. 130:

"When the criminal proceedings against
Demjanjuk began in Jerusalem, the first and most important witness
for the prosecution was the former dock worker Elias Rosenberg, born
on May 10, 1924 in Warsaw. Rosenberg enacted some dramatic scenes for
the television cameras after

79

claiming to recognize Ivan Demjanjuk
beyond any doubt as the man who had operated the gassing engine of
lhe Treblinka gas chamber.

"But this was not Rosenberg's first
testimony. As early as December 24, 1947 he had made his appearance
at the `Jewish Historical Documentation' (that's Wizenthal;
-author's note) to be one of the first witnesses to report the
`truth about the extermination camp Treblinka

"For our Holocaust-opinion-makers that
was highly significant - Rosenberg became a historical
figure."

Rullmann goes on to point out that in 1946
the American government submitted a document (USA-293) to the
International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg which indicated that the
people were killed in Treblinka with steam(!). There was no mention
of "gassing".

On p. 132 of Rullmann's book, we
learn:

"Rosenberg's account is the basis for
almost everything we know about Treblinka. Rosenberg traveled from
trial to trial and also played a significant part in the German
Treblinka trials, not least of all because the German legal
authorities had not found out until much later, purely by chance,
about this mysterious concentration and extermination camp where a
million or even more people allegedly died without any trace of them
ever having been found."

Happily, said Rosenberg proceeded to expose
himself as false witness. For in Vienna on December 24, 1947
Rosenberg put on record that he had personally had a hand in the
murder of Ivan the Terrible (though he modestly calls it killing, not
murder). Rullmann documents this with a facsimile of Rosenberg's
Vienna deposition, reprinted on p. 133 of his book.

How can one believe a witness who claims
today - 50 years later - to recognize a man "by the way he moves",
when he had already erred in his identification once before (as he
must admit today), namely 50 years ago, when he participated up close
and personally in the selfsame man's murder?

In this context Rullmann writes on p. 145:
"The prosecution's witness Rosenberg is obviously problematic
-for the prosecution as well as for the defense. For while the
defense sees in him a witness who misremembers today, the prosecution
must prove that he misremembered in 1947."

Elsewhere, on pages 145 and 146, Rullmann
quotes further bizarre imaginings of the false witness Rosenberg, who
was permitted to spout these with impunity in the German courts:

"The problem with Rosenberg is that he
has perhaps never told the truth. There were never any `new gas
chambers that could hold up to 12,000 people' in Treblinka. The
excavators who were at times stationed in Treblinka are shown in the
photo album of the former commandant of

80

Treblinka, Kurt Franz. Rosenberg's
claim that their `scoops loomed almost 100 feet [that's
approximately the height of a 12-story building] into the smoky
sky of Treblinka' is no small exaggeration in view of these
photographs. "

As a final thought regarding Demjanjuk- and
Holocaust-witness Rosenberg, here is one more quote from Rullmann (p.
146):

"The Holocaust is undermined by its
own witnesses. Rosenberg is a danger both to the prosecution and to
the defense, depending on which of his testimonies one chooses to
believe. But of course he also poses a danger to everything that
people know about the Holocaust: his statements, which consist
primarily of untruths, exaggerations and contradictions, are only too
suited to giving rise to doubts about the Holocaust as a whole."

But since having doubts about the Holocaust
is a crime in Austria that carries a punishment of up to ten years'
imprisonment, I must do my level best from now on not to entertain
any doubts of this nature - doubts such as those that have evidently
begun to plague the journalist Rullmann and such as I have discussed
in my book Freispruch für Hitler?

Subornation of witnesses. Extortion.
Death threats. Jagschitz, the professor to whom it's all new. The
Wizenthal Mafia's `witness tourism'.

Upon drawing up a court expertise regarding
the existence of gas chambers in the Third Reich - an expertise which
took him five years and for which he was paid two million Austrian
schilling - Prof. Dr. Gerhard Jagschitz, the sworn court expert from
the University of Vienna's Institute for Contemporary History,
testified on May 5, 1992 in the trial against me and my book
Freispruch für Hitler? that he did not believe in the
existence of a world-encompassing "conspiracy" to recruit false
witnesses. He said, verbatim (see pp. 345-347 of his Report):

"Now if one enters into this system
and says that all - and I have by no means seen the testimony of all
victims :.. that all the victims are just telling Hex- one must say
that these witness statements came about at such widely different
times and places, I mean, before an Australian court and before an
American court, before an Israeli court and a German one,... and one
would have to assume an absurd system of international conspiracy
which would mean that all witnesses before the courts at all times
are blackmailed and tortured, and the bottom line is always the same.
That's too absurd for me, I simply can't discuss something like
that."

81

So this court expert tried to give the court
the impression that he was unaware of the worldwide recruitment
program carried on by Israel and the American OSI (Office of Special
Investigations). He also hasn't a clue about the decades-long
collaboration of the OSI and Israel with the forgery workshops of the
KGB.

This university professor, of all his
colleagues in all of Central Europe the best-informed about the
Holocaust, claims to know absolutely nothing about Demjanjuk's forged
service ID card which I myself as well as media reports had
prominently referred to in the course of the Demjanjuk trial.

To my questions regarding this oddity,
Jagschitz stated (in the course of the proceedings against me, court
file Hv 5720/90) that he took no interest in media reports.
But this lack of interest, which should be rather unusual for a
contemporary historian, fails to adequately tone down his false
statements before the court: after all, Tuvia Friedmann, the former
Chief of the Documents Department and Director of the Jewish Agency
in Vienna, already informed him first-hand, years ago, about the
goings-on in the Demjanjuk case and about the accused man's innocence
(Profil, June 25, 1988). I shall prove this point in the
presumably upcoming trial against court expert Jagschitz (since I
have brought charges against him for presenting false "expert
evidence" in court).

Herr Jagschitz thus also cannot have been
ignorant of the fears that tormented Eichmann-hunter Friedmann in the
context of his opposition to the manner in which the Demjanjuk trial
was conducted. As Rullmann puts it on p. 145 of his book:

"Friedmann explained that Jewish
co-religionists had even threatened to kill him if he were to confirm
what Rosenberg had clearly affirmed in 1947 - namely, that Ivan of
Treblinka had already been dead since 1943."

But if, as we may assume, Jagnschitz knows
full well that even Friedmann - a prominent member of the Israeli
secret service and the real brains behind the Eichmann abduction -
has been on the receiving end of death threats, then how can
Jagschitz reject the idea that witnesses were blackmailed or made
submissive by other means, as an idea "too absurd to discuss"?

Witness tourism.

On p. 151 Rullmann
writes:

"`Added to this', the Hagen court's
Reasons for Sentence state, `is the fact that most of the witnesses
living in Israel occasionally meet there and

82

exchange memories. This makes it
possible that they may later confuse things they experienced
themselves and things they have heard.'

"Observers of other war crimes trials
have also noted that certain witnesses appear time and again.
A sort of `witness tourism' has developed:
witnesses have joined in groups, repeatedly traveling the world
together, living in the same hotels and enjoying the comforts of such
free trips, and engaging in the constant exchange of memories In the
process their testimony becomes more alike, aligned with each other's
as it were. "

Of all these things, which the journalist
Rullmann discovered in the Demjanjuk trial files alone, the court
expert university professor Dr. Gerhard Jagschitz failed to notice
anything at all in the course of his five years of "research",
despite a fee of two million schilling.

The witness Goldfarb.

"At the entrance to the gas chamber
stood the two Ukrainians Ivan Demjanjuk and
Nikolai, the one armed with an iron bar, the other with a sword(.).
They too beat the people as they herded them inside... As soon as the
gas chambers were full, the Ukrainians closed the doors and started
the machines."

At this point Rullmann pauses in justified
astonishment, which he expresses thus:

"How did a Ukrainian guard, whose
weapons were regulated by strict guidelines, come to have a sword?
And most of all: Ukrainian guards did not use to introduce themselves
to the prisoners with full name and calling card. How
could the witness Goldfarb have already learned in the
concentration camp that the `Ukrainian armed with a sword' bore the
surname,Demjanjuk?

"We could readily answer this
ourselves: the witness Goldfarb did not learn the name Demjanjuk in
the concentration camp, but rather many years after the war's end,
when John Denyanjuk was already being publicly accused in Cleveland,
Ohio of having been 'Ivan the Terrible'"

But the witness Avraham Goldfarb was not
able to solve all of America's and Israel's problems with his
testimony. He deprived it of all value a short time later, by
retracting it. As Rullmann reports on p. 161:

"Last week (March 29, 1986)
the Holocaust Research Center of Bar Ilan University obtained
another statement, according to which 'Ivan the Terrible' had already
been killed during the inmates' uprising."

83

Shortly thereafter the witness Goldfarb died
- not, I hope, of his retraction, but of natural causes.

The role of Jewish
witnesses.

I shall begin by quoting
Rullmann:

"For these reasons the role of Jewish
witnesses was accorded little value, and not only by German courts In
the USA as well, judges have begun to avoid basing verdicts too
firmly on such Jewish testimony. The case described -that of Frank
Walus - was not the only one to prove that such witnesses can 'err'
and are quite able to put on acts fit for the stage - though they can
remember little or nothing precisely, if ever they witnessed the
events at issue at all.

"In 1978 another Ukrainian, Feodor
Fedorenko, was supposed to be stripped of his American citizenship
(just like Demjanjuk later) for allegedly having been present first
in Trawniki and then in Treblinka. Six witnesses
took the stand against him and swore that they had witnessed horrible
cruelties allegedly committed by Fedorenko. However, the Florida
judge came to the conclusion that the testimony of the Jewish
witnesses was 'conflicting and uncertain' and therefore 'unsuitable
as a basis for drawing conclusions'.

"The witnesses were dismissed for lack
of credibility.

"They were exactly the same witnesses
who are now testifying against Ivan Demjanjuk."

The aforementioned court expert Jagschitz
has never seen or heard anything of these professional false
witnesses. Just so he wouldn't have to discuss the matter.

At this point, however, I feel I must note
an inaccuracy in Hans Peter Rullmann's otherwise excellent and
thoroughly researched book: in the passage quoted from p. 164, to
avoid misunderstandings, he should not have used the generalization
"Jewish witnesses". I refer the reader to the Weise case, which shows
clearly that witnesses of Jewish descent, Israeli citizenship or
Jewish religious affiliation are entirely willing to tell the truth
if they are asked. If one listens to them, and if they are allowed to
speak.

But they are not listened to and not allowed
to speak out. A case in point is the German Jew Benedikt Kautsky, a
noble-minded intellectual who gives a credible and realistic account
of the conditions in the German concentration camps (cf. his book
Teufel and Verdammte). Because he had never seen gas chambers
himself and heard of them only after the war;

84

because he dared to specify the size of the
bread rations, the amount of the weekly wages, and the option of
buying extra rations in a canteen; and because he dared to attribute
the violence and brutality towards inmates primarily to the Kapos,
and first and foremost to the Polish and the criminal Kapos (whom
Wizenthal goes to such lengths to spare, for some obscure reason);
because Kautsky dared to do these things, he and his book were hushed
up.

The "Jewish witnesses" Rullmann meant by his
reference are of course that gang armed with KGB document forgeries -
the gang persistently presented by the Wizenthal Witness Mafia, i.e.
by Israel and the American Office of Special Investigations: that
professional Jewish false witness mafia of whose existence Professor
Jagschitz is so completely ignorant.

The witnesses Münzberger and
Metzig.

These two German witnesses were linked
closely to the Treblinka gas chamber, where they served as SS guards;
they are presently alive and at liberty, in other words they are
persons who were willing to cooperate. Münzberger got off with a
12-year prison term (for being an accessory to the alleged
million-fold murder) but had to serve only eight of his 12 years.
Willi Metzig, on the other hand, was never even convicted.

Rullmann rightly points out (p.
170):

"As an aside, one cannot help but make
a comparison here which should also be a factor in one's assessment
of the Demjanjuk case: Münzberger, who allegedly was a
supervisor at the gas chamber together with Matthes, was sentenced to
twelve years in prison, and was paroled after eight years. Metzig was
never convicted..

"But now an insignificant Ukrainian is
to be hanged for allegedly having been in Treblinka against his will,
and despite the ,fact that there are neither Jewish nor German
witnesses for this."

Rullmann's doubts about the authenticity of
the "gas chamber" confessions and how they were obtained also appear
from the following (p. 171):

"With many accused one got the
impression that they admitted the possibility of mass gassings only
under the pressure exerted on them by the long time they had already
spent in detention awaiting trial, and by the expectations of the
court in whose hands their fate lay."

One thing is for certain, namely that those
former SS guards who were not simply murdered after the war's end and
who confessed to the existence

85

of gas chambers and were willing to
incriminate comrades either went altogether unpunished or received
sentences such as are imposed today for shoplifting or similar minor
offenses.

Anyone who did not "deny" the existence of
the gas chambers but only disputed his own share of the blame had a
good chance of getting off with only a few years in prison.

Those, however, who disputed not only
their own personal guilt but the existence of the gas chambers as a
whole are either dead or in prison for life, or else they are living
in a country where the long arm of the OSI and Israel, in other words
Wizenthal, cannot reach.

The witness Otto Horn.

The case of the witness Otto Horn shows us
like none other that being accessory to "murder of one million Jews"
need not have any grave consequences for the "culprit" as long as he
is willing to "confess".

As concentration camp guard Horn oversaw the
men carrying the corpses and, regardless of the laws of physics,
supervised "cremation grates in fire pits", thus making a significant
contribution to the "mass extermination". He was also shown to have
had a hand in the German euthanasia program prior to his time in
Treblinka - yet nonetheless he was acquitted! It is possible to
understand this only if one knows that Otto Horn was not only the
chief defendant but also a witness for the prosecution, in which role
he compliantly confirmed the so-called "gassing procedure" which his
former comrades disputed.

Most importantly, he severely incriminated
his fellow-defendants who denied the "gassing procedure".

To put this into perspective: someone
writing a book in Austria today, disputing the "gas chambers", risks
a more severe punishment than a defendant from those days who was
accused of million-fold murder but who agreed to make a deal with the
court and the prosecution and confirmed the existence of "gas
chambers".

This selfsame Otto Horn, who presently lives
in Berlin, an old man, and who according to Rullmann claims to
remember nothing about his time in Treblinka, was visited (as we
learn on p. 173) 20 years later in his home in Kreuzberg by American
investigators: they felt, correctly, that they could rely on Horn,
who indeed recognized "Ivan the Terrible" (whom he had never heard of
before) on photos shown to him for this purpose. He also agreed to
serve as witness for the prosecution. But when Demjanjuk's

86

defense team visited Horn a little while
later, Horn admitted that he could not recall what the Ukrainian had
looked like - in other words, he retracted his own deposition against
Demjanjuk.

On p. 174 Rullmann describes the
consequences of this act:

"This action by Otto Horn disturbed
the prosecution in Jerusalem Hardly had it become known that Horn was
no longer a viable witness for the prosecution against Demjanjuk that
Horn also received several 'house calls', in the course of which he
was made aware of the consequences the retraction of his first
statement would haves He was then again questioned in the Berlin
headquarters.

"Now Horn was again certain that he
could 'definitely' identify Demjanjuk after all And so Horn became
the only German witness for the prosecution. In order to make him
more likeable, the American and Israeli press took to describing him
as a 'male nurse' who could identify Demjanjuk: for Horn had been a
'male nurse' in the service of the German euthanasia program before
he was posted to Treblinka."

Court expert Professor Jagschitz knows
nothing of all this and persists in considering the subornation of
witnesses by international investigators as too absurd to discuss.

Israeli court travels from Asia Minor to
Europe.

Regarding the traveling habits of Israeli
judges, who engage in international witness searches (as our fake
court expert Jagschitz tried to deny in the May 1992 trial against
me), Hans Peter Rullmann tells us on p. 174:

"In a search for further witnesses,
the Israeli court now (June 1987) toured the Federal Republic of
Germany, but the three judges(.) and Israeli public prosecutor
Horowetz returned home with probablv not inconsiderable
frustration..."

Pre-treated witnesses.

"But all three witnesses whom the
Israeli court was to question had been well prepared in advance. Even
during the extradition proceedings against Demjanjuk in the United
States they had already been 'visited' by the Office of Special
Investigations (OSI), an institution of the American Ministry of
Justice that deals exclusively with the prosecution of supposed Nazi
criminals in the United States."

87

Of this organization and its ways of dealing
with witnesses, the dishonest expert Jagschitz is as ignorant as he
is of the odd travel and interrogation activities of Israeli court
judges acting in complicity with their chief prosecutor. Neither
Roman nor Germanic nor any other kind of law provides for this sort
of group travel for purposes of the perversion of justice through
subornation of witnesses.

Rullmann continues (p. 175):

"The witnesses had been committed to
give testimony clearly incriminating Demjanjuk...

"It must be noted that one witness
later complained in writing that he had been asked leading questions
under false pretenses."

The dishonest court expert Jagschitz knows
nothing of this.

Retraction of sworn
affidavits.

Rullmann continues on p. 175:

"When Ivan Demjanjuk's defense
contacted the witnesses for the prosecution, they all stated that
their depositions had been repeated in court in a completely untrue
manner...

"One of the many oddities marking the
trial of Ivan Demjanjuk is that the witnesses were not left in peace
even after they had already sworn their affidavits. For when the
Israeli criminal authorities learned that the German witnesses for
the prosecution had all retracted the testimony they had previously
provided under the influence of the OSI officials, these German
witnesses again received 'house calls': this time from officials from
the Israeli police and public prosecutor's office.

"In the course of these
'house calls' the witnesses were again restored to allegiance, as it
were, to their initial testimony. (False court expert
Jagschitz is not aware of these practices.) Even the Israeli
public prosecutor Horowetz himself participated in such
'discussions': immediately prior to the Israeli court's trip to the
Federal Republic of Germany, the witness Schafer received a visit
from Horowetz and was urged insistently to retract his sworn
retraction.

"Such 'discussions' were also held in
Cologne with the witness Leonhardt and in West Berlin with the
witness Otto Horn."

Even if one were to assume that the former
SS-men among the witnesses were not pressured with threats of renewed
proceedings against themselves - which seems an unlikely supposition,
given all we now know about this trans-continental false-witness
machinery - these "house calls" by Israeli

88

judges and public prosecutors as well as
American secret agents, conducted in (to them) foreign countries and
legal systems, can only be described as criminal gangster methods,
not as the legitimate actions of the agents of jurisprudence.

If Austria and Germany were truly sovereign
states, the witness terrorists would be handcuffed the moment they
arrived at the airport, and taken before a magistrate.

But Jagschitz knows nothing of all
this.

The "Auschwitz Cudgel" turns into a
boomerang.

In its special issue of April 1992, titled
"Ivan the Terrible", the Liberal Jewish newspaper SemitTimes
once again proves that there is yet a decent Jewish voice in
Germany.

After the journalists Rudolf Muller and
Ulrich Volklein had reported in the March S, 1992 issue of the
magazine Stern that the Federal Criminal Police Office in
Wiesbaden, under its Department Chief Dr. Luis-Ferdinand Werner, had
found that the SS service ID no. 1393 was a forgery, the German press
in Austria and Germany maintained an embarrassed silence.
SemitTimes took the honor of being the only publication to
pick up on the Stern's sensational report and to examine it
openly and without reservations.

SemitTimes also reported on
Department Chief Werner's secret memorandum which - with reference to
Israel - culminated in the words: "Evidently factual aspects were
to be subordinated to political considerations "

But Jagschitz hasn't a clue.

And so I shall conclude this chapter about
the Demjanjuk case with a quotation from the Jewish newspaper
SemitTimes, since I believe that it would be hard to find a
more appropriate comment:

"It is clear now beyond any doubt that
Demjanjuk was not 'Ivan the Terrible' and that the ID card which led
to his conviction is a fake. One fears that the Israeli authorities,
and particularly the chief prosecutor Shaked himself, knew this from
the start.

"This turns the entire matter into an
enormous scandal and threatens to plunge the memory of the Holocaust
into a fatal crisis."

"There sits the murderer!", said David
Gebhauer of Israel, a witness testifying before the American court,
and pointed at the accused. The witness' voice trembled with emotion.
As do those of all Wizenthal witnesses.

"In 1942 this man who is called Franz
Walus ordered a young woman to undress in the street. When she
refused he felled her with a bullet into the neck, and also shot the
two children who had had to watch their mother's murder."

Years later, the allegations made by this
witness turned out to be lies. As did the testimonies of the
other ten witnesses who had come from Israel to testify.

"The American government wanted a war
criminal. With tile help of Szymon Wiesenhal, the Israeli police, the
American press and the judge Julius Hoffmann, they caught one."
With these words the well-known American journalist Flora
Johnson began her article in the January 23, 1981 issue of the
Reader Chicago Free Weekly in which she presented a thorough
analysis of the sensational news of Walus' innocence.

After the Walus case at the latest - a case
which was largely hushed up in Europe - the world should have
unmasked Szymon Wizenthal as the head of a gang of false witnesses:
eleven perjurious Jewish witnesses had identified the American
citizen Frank Walus as SS and Gestapo man as well as war criminal and
twenty-fold murderer, despite knowing that this was untrue.

To briefly summarize the case:

In 1973 a Polish criminal who had rented
rooms in Frank Walus' house invited Walus on a trip to Austria where
he wanted to introduce him to an Austrian detective (a stamp
collector like Walus himself). The Pole suggested to Walus that on
the trip back home he could bring some National Socialist artifacts
back to United States where they could no doubt be sold at a nice
profit. Walus, though unsuspecting, refused.

1n 1974 Szymon Wizenthal accused Frank Walus
of having been a Gestapo agent. Walus, seeing Wizenthal on American
television, recognized him as that Viennese "detective" and stamp
collector whom he had been urged to visit only a few months earlier.
Wizenthal charged that Walus, in his role as Gestapo agent, had
delivered Jews from the Czestochowa ghetto into the hands of the
Gestapo. Wizenthal used the same ritual and the same mass media
effects which, as we shall see, are typical of his entire criminal

95

career as Nazi hunter. At first: via a media
campaign. Running parallel to this was an unorthodox but no less
inhuman supplement: fliers and posters in his victim's home city,
Chicago. As yet, the "crimes" which Franz Walus was later to be
accused of did not exist. As yet there were no eyewitness statements.
But Wizenthal had a victim and, just as in many other cases,
procuring witnesses posed no problem for him. And indeed, right after
the media campaign a total of eleven witnesses (all of whom had
miraculously survived) "turned up" in Israel, as per Wizenthal's
motto: "Once we've got a criminal, we'll easily find a crime with
public appeal."

In January 1977 the American government
charged Frank Walus, a factory worker in early retirement, with
having brutally murdered twenty people in his capacity as SS and
Gestapo man. Walus lost all his friends and acquaintances overnight.
Under the pressure exerted by Wizenthal's strategy, Walus' wife and
children were also almost totally ostracized.

For two years the family was tormented by
countless threatening and harassing telephone calls and letters.
Factory worker Walus lost all his savings, earned in the course of
his hard-working life. Legal fees alone cost him US $160,000. Even
today, after his innocence has been established, the US government
denies him any compensation whatsoever. At any rate, in his first
court case, after all the witnesses and evidence in his defense had
been rejected by the court, Walus was convicted of having murdered
twenty people in Poland during the war. Since the court considered
that he had gained his American citizenship under false pretenses, he
was stripped of his citizenship and extradition proceedings were
instituted. Frank Walus appealed this decision, and surprisingly his
appeal was granted in April 1978. On April 8, 1978, Bill Gradey,
writing in the Chicago Tribune, reported on the line-up of
defense witnesses.

National Socialists and their descendants
show Wizenthal's Israeli witnesses committed perjury.

Coming from Germany were the farmers' wives
Walburga Welte, 63; Margarethe Goelz, 72; Maria Zeller, 69; Viktoria
Ritter, 78; as well as the farmer Anton Stolz, 50. Franz Walus had
worked on their farms as a young Polish forced laborer from 1940 to
1945. All of them came from farms whose owners had been members of
the Nazi party until 1945. A former French prisoner-of-war and
another Polish forced laborer as well as various documents and
photographs also clearly confirmed that the accused was innocent and
that his claims were correct: Franz Walus had been a farmhand

96

on the farms of Bavarian peasants from 1940
to 1945. He never once exchanged his cardigan for a uniform or his
wooden shoes for SS boots. There was also no other Franz Walus
anywhere, neither in Germany nor in Poland. As well, the crimes he
was charged with had never been alleged before in the time since
1945, and given the realities of National Socialist legislation they
could not have been committed, openly on public streets, as alleged
by the false witnesses.

If it had become necessary, two entire
Bavarian villages would have been willing to speak up jointly in
court on behalf of the wartime forced laborer, and for the truth.
This phalanx proved to be too much for Szymon Wizenthal's team of
professional witnesses.

For all the decades that had passed, Walus
had kept in touch "his German farmers". Ever since 1945, Easter and
Christmas cards had crossed the "Big Pond" from both sides every year
- small testimonials of humanity and friendship between different
peoples.

"People don't understand why I love my
German farmers so much, " Walus told a reporter from the
Sunday Chicago Tribune. "They all treated me so well back then! I
was never hungry. I never had to wear a dirty shirt. They treated me
like my own mother!"Franz Walus is a man who does not
hesitate to tell the truth about "the Germans".

Perhaps that was why Wizenthal picked
him.

Nothing that happened in the Walus case is
unique. Rather, it is typical - for the activities of the Galician
crook Szymon Wizenthal.

He saved the life of a Jewish girl, whom
he carried on his back through Soviet shellfire.

He was known in Auschwitz as the "good
SS-man with one eye".

When Wizenthal's false witnesses came
knocking at his door 27 years later, he called on his former Jewish
inmates for help.

He sought them throughout the world. And
they came. From Israel. From Poland. From the Netherlands and the
United States. And they exonerated the man who had had to guard them
in an SS uniform in Auschwitz.

But Judge Klein - who opened the trial
with an Auschwitz propaganda film and with an inflammatory
anti-Fascist tirade that culminated in demands for the erection of a
memorial to the crimes of National Socialism, and who later based his
verdict on lies contradicting the trial records - rejected 20 Jewish
witnesses in this trial for the sole reason that they were witnesses
for the defense. As for the testimony of those four whom he deigned
to hear - he ignored it.

Judge Klein loved Jewish witnesses. But
only as witnesses for the prosecution. He had no use for witnesses
for the defense. In that, he is an accurate reflection of post-1945
jurisprudence as a whole.

Nonetheless - or perhaps precisely
because of this - the Weise case is a testimonial of
Jewish decency - and the finest hour of that monster in human form
named Court Vice President Klein of Wuppertal.

The seriously war-disabled pensioner
Gottfried Weise, sentenced for alleged five-fold brutal murder to
multiple lifetime prison terms on the basis of one single, patently
false claim of a Jewish witness, was exonerated by a total of 20
witnesses, most of them former Jewish concentration camp inmates. But
the defense witnesses were not believed. After the verdict, Weise
wrote a letter to his seven-year-old grandson; I quote the last four
sentences:

"I would have loved to fulfil your
little dreams and wishes for a long time yet, and to stay with you as
your loving grandfather. Fate did not deal kindly with us this time.
But one day when I can no longer go on here on Earth, your
grandfather will return to you every night from Heaven, and we will
again all dream together of peace and good will on Earth. I love you
all so much! Your grandfather."

102

Disregarding for a moment the deeply moving
human dimension of the Weise case, we must say that this case will go
down in post-war history as a testimonial to the willingness of
Jewish witnesses to act in a decent and humane manner. With utter
contempt for the enmity their testimonies could not but earn them,
they all came and not only spoke up for Gottfried Weise but also
painted a completely different picture of reality in Auschwitz than
that touted by the professional witnesses sponsored by Wizenthal i.e.
Israel. This case is one of the few where the accused was an SS man
who in the course of his duties was in direct contact with the
inmates under his charge and who was thus able to name Jewish
witnesses in his defense.

"But I remember that he was the one
who probably saved the life of one of our fellow inmates in the last
days of the deportation from Ravensbrück by carrying her on his
back across the field, through artillery fire."

The witness who pointed this out in writing
on September 25, 1987 to the jury court of Wuppertal was

1. the Jewess Dr. Susan Cernyak-Spatz, who
also noted in her deposition that she was not aware of any misdeeds
whatsoever committed by Gottfried Weise.

2. The Jew Jakob de Hond stated in Amsterdam
on July 9, 1984:

"With regard to the man you mention,
Weise, I must say that I'm not aware of the incident."
(i.e. the alleged crime.)

3. The former Jewish Kapo Joseph von Rijk
testified:

"I don't recall the name Gottfried
Weise. I only ever saw one execution."

4. The Jewess Cipota Tahori testified in Tel
Aviv on January 21, 1972:

"In the 'Kanada' commando, none of
the members were murdered in the time that I was part of
this commando (March 1943 to January 1945). I am also not aware
that other inmates from the 'Kanada' commando were ever killed, or
taken away to be killed elsewhere."

5. The Jew Dr. Hans Eisenschimmel
stated on September 20, 1983 at the Austrian Ministry of the
Interior, Group C, Vienna:

"Through an SS man who was also from
Vienna and who asked me if I would like to work under him, I ended up
in the Personal Effects Depot ['Kanada'] .. I've never heard
of any Unterscharführer Weise.. I never heard this name in the
Effects Depot.. I've also never heard of the crime that is being
imputed to him. I would certainly have remembered that."

103

6. The Jew Isaac Liver stated at the
National Police Headquarters in Gentilly, on October 18, 1985:

"I did not witness the crimes
mentioned in this file and I also never heard anyone talk about them
I don't believe that this story is true, because if it were, then no
doubt all the prisoners in that camp and probably also those from
other camps would have known about it."

7. The Jewess Luise Heuser testified on
October 25, 1983 in Giessen, before the senior public prosecutor of
the Cologne Central Office:

"I am in touch with the former
Auschwitz deportee Illonka Lazar who lives in Budapest.. I don't know
of anv incident where an SS man killed an inmate while trying to
shoot a tin can off his head I can't remember it."

8. The Jewess Shoshana Orenstein
was questioned in Netanya on January 27, 1972, on the request of
the Austrian Ministry of the Interior, and stated:

"In September 1944 we were betrayed by
an informer. I was in the hospital at the time - it was exactly three
days after I had given birth. Men in German uniforms got me and my
child out of the hospital and took me to a collection camp with about
a thousand other people, to Auschwitz-Birkenau.
I was put into the 'Kanada' camp... I did not witness any killings
during my time in Birkenau. I have also never heard of any killings
allegedly committed by the man mentioned, by Slepy [this
was Weise's nickname in the camp]."

To me, the testimonial given here by Mrs.
Orenstein is unique and touching because this woman, who was
committed to Auschwitz with her newborn and who more than any other
witness might have been inclined to give a vindictive, negative
statement due to hatred prompted by her personal fate, in fact not
only exonerated the accused but also disputes any murder of inmates
(evidently also of children).

9. The Jew Boleslaw Kazimierz
Kierski testified at the Warsaw District Court on April 24, 1984:

"Of the men who were on duty with the
'Kanada' commando, I remember... as well as Unterscharffhrer Weise..
He wore a black patch over his left eye... But I never saw him beat
or otherwise mistreat inmates. I also never saw Weise or anyone else
take shots at inmates with tin cans on their heads I never heard of
any such incident ."

104

10. The Jewess Marie Helene Nagel wrote a
letter, dated August 12, 1947, which the defense submitted to the
court. The letter states:

"Those who were in charge of cleaning
the SS houses often spoke of Weise. They called him the 'good SS-man
with one eye'!"

11. The Jewess Marketa Sandor of Rue Bosio,
Paris 7, testified that she had never personally seen, nor learned
from hearsay, anything about the execution of inmates - even though
she was a member of the commando in question.

12. The Jew Mayer Zylberg of 39 Rue
Stendhal, Paris 20, stated:

"The accused did not work in the
'Kanada' commando prior to the transfer of this witness(with reference to the witness for the prosecution) in
September 1944."

13. The Jew Roman Taul of Bradkow 10,
Tarnowskij Gori, Poland, testified that, as the accused himself said,
he had not done duty at the place and time in question. Also, the
guards did not have access to any guns or submachine guns, much less
machine guns, in the camp. Crimes such as those the accused was
charged with had never been alleged against him before.

14. The Jew lschajahu Kalfuss of
Herzlija, Israel, testified to the defense that he had spent the
years from 1942 to 1945 in Auschwitz. In the time and place in
question no so-called "tin-can shooting" had taken place. Beyond
that, no-one was shot in the aforementioned time in the camp area at
all, with the sole exception of a Greek inmate who was shot while
trying to escape.

To summarize: all of the Jewish witnesses
presented by the defense unanimously exonerated the accused Gottfried
Weise and fully corroborated his own statements. Further, they
portrayed everyday life in Auschwitz very differently than did the
witnesses for the prosecution, provided by the Wizenthal Lobby. This
description of life in Auschwitz - which these witnesses gave
independently of each other, yet mutually corroborative - shows that
arbitrary murders committed by SS guards are a fairy tale rather than
something that might actually have occurred in National Socialist
concentration camps.

The fact that Gottfried Weise - universally
popular all his life, and with a spotless record - a man about whom
the witness Dr. Cernyak-Spatz reports that he saved a Jewish girl's
life by carrying her through Russian artillery fire

105

- could nevertheless be convicted of a
bizarre mass murder is due exclusively to the depraved character of
the judge presiding over this trial. For this trial differs from all
other war crimes trial in the additional disgraceful fact that the
judge not only refused to admit most of the witnesses for the defense
and knowingly misused the testimony that was admitted, but also
incorporated in his Reasons for Sentence falsehoods contradicting the
trial files themselves in order to justify his criminal verdict:
this criminal in official robes, who knowingly sentenced an
innocent man to life behind bars, is District Court Vice President
Wilfried Klein, of Wuppertal. In his disgraceful verdict Klein
wrote, for instance, that former SS-men from Auschwitz-Birkenau had
made no testimony to exonerate Gottfried Weise. The exact reverse is
true - and whoever cares to call the inhuman monster Klein a liar can
prove his claim with the testimony of the former SS guards that were
questioned in the course of this trial, as documented in file
reference LKA/NW-23-Tgb. No. 25985.

In the following, some excerpts from the
testimony of Wizenthal's false witness, for which Herr Klein
sacrificed the mutually corroborative testimony of 17 competent
witnesses for the defense:

"He fired several individual shots
with leis machine gun."

(SS guards in the camps had no machine
guns.)

"He didn't shoot with a revolver, but
with a long rifle. He always fired shots with this gun. He had
several guns and changed them frequently. He also had a gun in the
bath."

(The SS men were bound by strict service
regulations, and other than the prescribed service pistol they could
have no weapons in the camps - neither in the bath nor elsewhere.)

"Executions took place almost every
day, almost every hour. I saw it myself."

(Excesses committed by SS guards against the
inmates were forbidden by a harsh service regulation; furthermore,
the 17 aforementioned witnesses also all stated that they had never
heard of any such crimes, much less seen any take place.)

"There was also an eight or nine year
old boy... They brought tin cans, Slepy (Weise) set them on the
child's head and shot at the can until the child was shot too. I was
right close by and I saw it."

106

(I would point out to the reader that due to
the service regulations governing the SS, and due to the realties of
everyday life in the concentration camps as described by the
witnesses for the defense, the murder of a child as alleged here was
unthinkable. Nonetheless it is part of the standard repertoire of
Szymon Wizenthal's gang of false witnesses. I shall return to this
point later.)

On February 8, 1988, the accused man's
despairing wife Ursula Weise wrote a letter to the court. I quote:

"The basis on which my husband was
convicted 'beyond any doubt' was the sole testimony of one alleged
eyewitness who claimed that my husband had shot two people after
first setting tin cans on their heads... My husband was convicted
even though an original document proves that he was not even in the
camp in question at the alleged time of the murder... The media have
nicknamed him 'William Tell of Auschwitz... The court refused to hear
the testimony of about 20 former Jewish inmates whom my husband
repeatedly named and asked to call in his defense... My husband never
hid, lived for 28 years in the home which he himself built and which
the state has now taken possession of, worked for the
same company for 30 years, and believed in a just verdict to the end
What we got instead was despair and poverty (the legal fees alone
have already exceeded DM 200,000) that crushed us and our son
Burghard's family, with whom we had lived happily together in our
house, an arrangement which has now also been brutally destroyed For
as long as I live I will use all the means available to me to fight
the glaring injustice that has been done to our two families."

(Here too we can clearly perceive
Wizenthal's hand at work: a mediaeffective name is coined for the
"perpetrator" of the fictitious deed, namely "Tell of
Auschwitz". It's the same style as "Ivan the Terrible",
"Stationmaster of Death ", etc.

One aspect typical of this trial, as of the
other show trials a la Szymon Wizenthal, is that the professional
witnesses for the prosecution always know the accused man's name and
rank exactly - which runs counter to the facts of everyday
concentration camp life - but are never able to give the names of
their murdered fellow inmates.

This deeply shocking case of Gottfried Weise
shows us that it is wrong to assume that Jewish witnesses are more
inclined than others to give false testimony and to commit perjury.
This assumption is often backed by references to Jewish religious
tenets, and I do in fact have in my possession a court expertise,
drawn up in 1953 by a Belgian university professor in

107

Berlin. which concludes that the Jewish
faith not only permits but actually continues to approve perjury
committed against non-Jews. But the attitude, veracity and honesty
of the former Jewish inmates of Auschwitz who joined ranks to speak
up in defense of Gottfried Weise refutes the assumption that persons
of Jewish extraction are more prone than others to commit perjury and
bear false witness. Rather, it seems to be the case that Wizenthal's
troop of witnesses are the dregs laboriously recruited from the
blackmailable scum of the Jewish population in Israel and the
Diaspora.

Who is the brains behind this worldwide
recruitment of Wizenthalian false witnesses, which organizations have
been in charge, and how the false witnesses are "pre-treated" and put
under pressure in house calls from foreign public prosecutors, are
things you can read up on in the chapter about the Demjanjuk case.

The facts presented in this chapter are
taken from the book Der Fall Weise by Rudiger Gerhard, Berg am
See: Turmer, 1991.

Because Robert Verbelen refused to work
for Wizenthal, he was charged with murder, but his trial ended in an
acquittal.

Because he refused a large sum of money
to write a book confirming the existence of "gas chambers", his other
books were taken from the market. One single publisher stood by him -
and died under mysterious circumstances.

True to the style we have become used to in
trials staged by Wizenthal, the former Flemish leader Robert Verbelen
had to face charges on 101 counts of murder, falsely imputed to him
by the Wizenthal Mafia. The confrontation took place in 1962 in the
Great Court of Vienna after four years' detention awaiting trial.

In those days Wizenthal still used to
personally attend the trials he had instigated through his witness
procurement organization. Perhaps this is the key to Wizenthal's
nature and to the real motives that prompted him to become the
professional advertisement of the Israeli-American Imperium's
anti-German propaganda machinery.

In any case, the "pleasure" he had hoped to
gain from the Verbelen trial eluded him. Verbelen took the
opportunity to sour the grapes for the old braggart sitting in the
courtroom.

"Herr Wiesenthal claims he has tracked
ate down and exposed me. In fact, I was naturalized in Austria under
my own name, and my house door sports a sign saying 'Verbelen' for
anyone to read I have no reason to hide."

With that, Wizenthal's fun in watching this
trial was already spoiled, and his infallible instinct told him that
he would not be able to satisfy his drive with the rest of this court
case either. I will never forget how Verbelen, under the guidance of
his defense counsel, the former SS-man Dr. Führer, enforced his
claim to an uninterrupted Right of Statement and, after the trial, to
a comprehensive closing speech. Both times Verbelen spoke for more
than five hours. I know of no other case where an accused in the
Second Republic was able to make full use of this right as
established by law.

Among the few witnesses for the defense was
the Flemish monk Pater Brauns, who sung a Flemish battle song in the
courtroom and then embraced the accused before the horrified tribunal
and cried, "I thank you, Verbelen, for all you did for
Flanders."

But Verbelen's unequaled personal courage,
his charisma and his thrilling rhetoric, from which not even his
heavy Flemish accent could

112

retract, would not have sufficed to save him
from the false testimony of a Major of the Belgian army who tried,
shortly before the end of the trial, to impute to Verbelen another
dozen murders of prisoners. In this case it was a former chief of the
American army's counterintelligence service, for which Verbelen had
worked from 1945 to 1955, who slipped Verbelen the documents he
needed in order to defend himself against these false allegations. I
doubt there is any other defendant who was charged with war crimes
and remained true to himself like Verbelen did, who ever had such
help to rely on.

And so Verbelen, who had already believed
himself lost, was able the next day to specify both to the court and
the Belgian false witness the precise date, time, latitude and
longitude where the ship that had transported the alleged murder
victims (who had actually been handed over to the German Reich for
trial and sentencing) had been torpedoed and sunk by a British
battleship.

There was no longer any doubt about
Verbelen's acquittal.

And this acquittal brought about a turning
point in Austrian jurisprudence, which finally began to see its way
to more and more acquittals, despite the protest marches staged by
the Wizenthalian witnesses. However, it must also be noted - and
Verbelen has personally confirmed this for me - that there were and
are considerable reservations among the American army and its
counterintelligence services with regard to the disproportionately
strong influence which the Jewish lobby has in the United States.
Accordingly, another attempt made in recent years (shortly before
Verbelen's death) to take the almost 80-year-old Flemish leader to
court again, and once again with the aid of false accusations, was
thwarted by the US Army. The Belgian government, acting on the
instigation of the Jewish Masonic lodge B'nai B'rith, had asked the
American authorities to surrender Verbelen's personal files. At first
the Americans simply refused to hand over the file, but then, under
pressure from the American Ministry of Justice, they did provide the
file - however, as Verbelen told me, two-thirds of the contents were
illegible, i.e. had been made useless.

Wizenthal tried to enlist Verbelen for
Nazi Hunt. Szymon's collaboration with the Communists.

Verbelen would never have been persecuted
and prosecuted if he had agreed to a scheme of Wizenthal's which one
Colonel Bukonjew of the Soviet secret service proposed to Verbelen in
1956 after the withdrawal of the occupation troops from Germany. He
addressed Verbelen by his

113

American secret service code name,
"Herbert", and invited him to work for the KGB. He also indicated
that if Verbelen should choose not to cooperate, the way would be
clear for Szymon Wizenthal to take steps against him. In the
manuscript of his last, unpublished book, of which I have a copy,
Verbelen comments on this as follows:

"The KGB Colonel's fears' quickly came
true. One Dr. Riesberger, a former Gestapo official, was unleashed on
me - a man who had fallen into the 'Nazi hunter's' clutches.
(Wizenthal loves to toy with blackmailable people...) A
deeply frightened, desperate man... He was not equal to his task He
soon threw off his mask and revealed what was expected of 'Herbert'.
I was supposed to help locate SS officers in hiding, and hunted
Nazis. All I would need to do would be to write a short little report
every week.. for all that was expected were the names and hiding
places of those we sought - and of course I would be well paid for
this, and safe from any inconveniences to myself." Verbelen
thus gives us a glimpse not only of the modus operandi used by
Szymon Wizenthal, who could not have staged his trials or made some
of his witnesses tractable if it weren't for blackmail. Verbelen's
observations also explain the odd acquittals and incredibly lenient
sentences passed on those former SS-men who admitted to the existence
of "gas chambers", as well as the devastatingly harsh verdicts
against those few "gas chamber deniers" who even survived the
post-war years at all. Moreover, we can also now understand the
fierce determination with which Wizenthal pursued those "war
criminals" whose cases are set out in his latest book Justice Not
Vengeance. After all, they without exception had disputed the
mass killings of Jews with poison gas in the Third Reich.

Attempted blackmail of Verbelen:
he was to confirm the gas chambers.

After his acquittal Verbelen managed to make
a name for himself as author. At first he wrote espionage novels,
whose outstanding stylistic quality readily announced that their
author was called to bigger and better things - as his later books
proved.

One day the past caught up with Verbelen in
the form of Baron von Winkel. He invited Verbelen to dinner in the
Vienna hotel "Intercontinental", praised his books and his popularity
with Flemish readers, and offered Verbelen not only that he would
support his books but also suggested that he would buy movie rights
to them by indicating that these stories were splendidly suited as a
basis for scripts.

114

Verbelen inquired about the price. I
quote from his yet-unpublished manuscript:

"And suddenly he said: 'You were a
Police General... and as such you must be able to confirm everything
that happened in the concentration camps.' 'I was not in a
concentration camp,' I replied, 'and I could confirm nothing of what
did or did not happen there."

Verbelen finally terminated the
conversation by refusing to confirm the existence of gas chambers,
which he had only heard of through the media after the war. A
man of his caliber had not even been tempted.

The cordial Baron von Winkel wore his
polite smile to the end, though it stood in strange contrast to the
threat expressed by his mysterious parting words. Again I quote von W
inkel's words directly from Verbelen's manuscript:

"So you really don't want to? You
scorn our well-meaning help? That's the way to provoke us. Don't you
know what that means? We have a lot of influence, Mr. Author!"

It wasn't long before Verbelen's books
disappeared from many bookstores. Publishers from several countries
apologized to Verbelen, saying that they would no longer be able to
publish his books. He also heard that bookstores had received
threats, ordering them to remove "the war criminal Verbelen's books"
from their display cases. An employee of the French publishing house
"Presse de la Cite" told him:

"It's a pity! But we are facing an
insurmountable wall, Monsieur Verbelen. You've provoked the devil -
not by what you wrote, but by what you didn't writ"(With reference to "gas chambers" whose existence he had refused
to confirm.)

One single publisher continued to publish
Verbelen's books. This was the Dutch publishing house
"Brabants-Vlaams-Boekbedrijv", led by the energetic young publisher
Mijnheer van Roei.

Just as the book Der Kauz ruft um
Mitternacht had sold more copies than any other previous book
by Robert Verbelen, this author's writing career was ended for good -
true to Baron von Winkel's words. I again quote from Verbelen's
manuscript:

"My publisher was found dead in a
hotel room Hanged. A few days before he died he had telephoned me;
optimistic and cheerful: 'Things are going well, we... are working
together with the publisher Walter Soethoudt in Antwerp to expand our
sales base,' he told me. It's hard to believe that a publisher who
has good news and successes to tell his author should turn around and
promptly kill himself."

115

However badly Wizenthal and the network for
which he commandeers the limelight may have hurt Verbelen's writing
career, they nonetheless met their match in this intrepid man. None
defied Wizenthal and the victors' justice system in Austria as
successfully as he did.

None other has, like Verbelen, gone up
against 101 witnesses who had come to bury him forever behind prison
walls, and succeeded with the power of his words, his spirit and his
personality in either drawing them over to the side of truth and
justice or else discrediting them so badly that they lost their
usefulness to Wizenthal.

And in no other instance since 1945 were the
vilifications spouted by the press, such as "anti-Semite" or "war
criminal", contrasted so sharply and disproved so dramatically by the
accused man's manner and appearance that they reversed into a
boomerang that turned back on the political show trial they had been
supposed to serve.

Standing by Verbelen, and of equal caliber,
was the unshakeable former SS officer, the illegal National Socialist
and humanist, Dr. Führer. Verbelen told me that it was Dr.
Führer who had enabled the doyen of Viennese defense counsels,
the Jewish attorney Dr. Michael Stern, to continue in the legal
profession as German Jew in the Third Reich and to represent the
interests of Jewish home and land owners in matters of financial law
in the National Socialist state.

How far above the cliches of anti-German and
anti-National Socialist incitement personalities such as Verbelen and
Dr. Führer stood also becomes clear from their relations with
Jewish individuals of their time.

For example, Dr. Stern himself told me how
he in turn had helped Dr. Führer after the Second World War by
interceding in his capacity as lawyer to free Führer from his
imprisonment by Allied Nazi-hunters. As regards Robert Verbelen, I
know from personal conversations that the then Austrian Federal
Chancellor of Jewish extraction, Dr. Bruno Kreisky, had telephoned
him - without knowing him personally - to ask him to witness for him
in the slander trial in which the Chancellor had been embroiled by
our old manhunter. (See also Quick, December 5, 1975, "Ich kann
beweisen, daf3 Wiesenthal lugt.")

Later, however, probably for reasons of
state, Kreisky dispensed with a complete exposure of the Restitution
Defrauder.

This book is also written in memory of the
Flemish leader Robert Verbelen, who proved to the timid hearts of our
time that the power which Wizenthal represents in the theater of
conflict between Jerusalem, London and New York in the sector of
anti-German incitement - however mighty it may be - is not
all-powerful.

He dies (accidentally) during extradition
detention, of "heart failure", the typical ailment of those who deny
the "gas chambers".

In our examination of the following cases,
all of which are detailed by Wizenthal in his book Justice Not
Vengeance because (see p. vii) they seemed to him "typical for
a variety of reasons", we shall concentrate on identifying the
parallelisms to the previously discussed cases of Walus, Demjanjuk,
Weise and Verbelen, where the incorrect nature of the testimony
obtained from hired or blackmailed false witnesses may be regarded as
proven.

SS-Obersturmbannführer Walter
Rauff, born in 1906, is accused by Wizenthal of being the inventor of
the so-called "gas van". It must be said at the outset that such a
"gas van" probably never even existed. I say this for the following
reasons:

1. Wizenthal claims to have evidence; he
states verbatim:

"The manufacture of airtight special
superstructures was entrusted to thefirm of Gaubschat in
Berlin (whose entire correspondence with Rauff has been preserved for
us)." (JNV p. 60. )

Documents of this nature would be direct
evidence for the factuality of mass gassings during the Third Reich.

The first expert ever to be sworn in by a
court - even though he is only a historian who was the first to be
commissioned to investigate the question of the gas chambers, namely
Professor Gerhard Jagschitz (Hv 5720/90) - failed to turn up any such
evidence even though he spent five years sniffing through all
relevant files in an honest effort to shore up the theory of the
existence of such chambers.

Since it is a fact that to date only two
documents of the "gas chamber lobby" could be examined by the Federal
Criminal Police Office in Wiesbaden or a comparable institution - and
that in both cases (Demjanjuk and Wizenthal - Basta, see
pp. ft:) the documents in question were found to be forgeries -
all other such documents cited by Wizenthal must be considered
unconfirmed at best, or forgeries at worst.

118

2. Since the entire subject literature as
well as the eyewitness testimony regarding both mobile and stationary
gassing with engine exhaust consistently refers to diesel engines,
and since diesel engines - unlike gasoline-powered engines - emit
only insufficient amounts of the killer gas carbon monoxide, the "gas
vans" can safely be relegated to the realm of fantasy a la Sneaky
Szymon & Syndicate.

Incidentally, experts have also determined
that gas-tight rooms and van superstructures would not have allowed
for gassing with exhaust, since the pressure of many tons, built up
by pumping the exhaust into the chamber, would have burst the van
superstructures or wrenched the iron doors off the various proposed
chambers.

It should also be noted that the term "gas
van" was indeed familiar to the Germans after the war - but it
referred to a kind of vehicle with an attached wood gas generator
which enabled it to be powered not only with gasoline but also with
wood gases, the so-called "producer gas".

As in almost all other cases described here,
Rauff was-a man who was held in high regard by those who knew him
before, during and after the war. For example, Rauff was aided in his
escape by the German Bishop in Rome, Alois Hudal. Another parallel to
other cases is that Rauff evidently did not have a guilty conscience:
in 1955 he returned to the Federal Republic of Germany and applied
for his pension under his real name.

The proceedings with regard to this
application dragged on for so long that Rauff emigrated to Chile in
the meantime.

What Wizenthal did then is typical for his
methods. On page 63 of .INV he describes with obvious relish how "a
friend of his" gained Rauffs confidence and enabled Wizenthal to come
into possession of an extensive correspondence. This trustfulness on
Rauff s part already indicates that he was not conscious of having
committed any crime.

Now Wizenthal put in motion all the usual
gears available to his "one-man operation". In this case these gears
were: President Ronald Reagan, Federal Chancellor Helmut Kohl, and
Rabbi Hier. And after the world power USA had jumped in to threaten
the Chilean President Pinochet with an economic boycott of his
country - which would of course have plunged hundreds of thousands of
people into poverty - Chile had been successfully forced almost to
its knees.

All it still took now was an ugly bit of
blackmail, as we learn from the culprit's i.e. Wizenthal's own lips
on p. 64 of his book. The Wizenthal Syndicate indicated to the
Chilean President Pinochet that it would reveal the identity of his
son, who was living in the United States under an assumed name.

119

A warrant for Rauffs arrest pending
extradition was issued, and Rauff was to be handed over to the
Chancellor of the refugee republic West Germany.

However, the prisoner did not give the
Chilean authorities the desired information regarding the existence
of the "gas vans". It is thus not surprising that he succumbed, even
before his extradition, to a convenient little heart attack.

There is every reason to suspect that
Eichmann as well disputed (denied) the "gas chambers". This is
indicated by the testimony of his right-hand man Alois Brunner. It is
also indicated by the fact that he was not extradited to Austria, but
to Israel, right into a plexiglass cage. And it is also indicated by
the fact that the sworn court expert Prof. Jagschitz was denied
access to the relevant files. Did Eichmann have to die because he
denied the "chambers"?

In light of all we know today, the matter
of Adolf Eichmann's guilt for the murder of Jews in the Third Reich
must be regarded with a hefty portion of skepticism.

1. A person who is forcibly abducted from
one nation by agents from another is the victim of a crime, and
criminals who have done such a despicable thing cannot presume to sit
in posthumous judgement over their victim.

2. It is a noteworthy novelty that in
this case a Central European was extradited, not to his own country -
Austria - but to Israel, a country that did not yet even exist at the
time the alleged crime was committed.

3. The Demjanjuk trial demonstrated that
it was certainly possible for an innocent man to be convicted by
means of forged documents, professional notorious false witnesses and
a court that traveled throughout Europe with its public prosecutor
for purposes of suborning witnesses; and thus, since the Demjanjuk
trial at the latest, the suspicion of brutal machinations and
perversion of justice cannot be ruled out in the Eichmann case
either.

4. Beyond that, the first sworn court
expert (though only a historian) who was permitted to examine the
"gas chamber" issue was barred by the Israeli state from any access
to the Eichmann files.

The only thing we know about Eichmann is
that he was in charge of measures for the resettlement of an as yet
indeterminate number of persons of Jewish extraction.

If one considers that during the last years
of the Soviet empire's existence Jewish politicians engaged in
numerous interventions to prevent Jews wishing to emigrate from the
Soviet Union from setting out on their

122

desired trip to the United States, and
channeled them against their wishes into Israel instead, then this is
essentially exactly the same thing that Eichmann did:

Namely, moving people from one place to
another against their will.

I personally am one of those people who
regret that the Jews were not invited to participate in Germany's
unification between 1933 and 1945. But to impose the death penalty
for resettlement measures taken under orders from higher-up, or to
tolerate the imposition of this death penalty subsequent to abduction
by a state that has trampled on human rights and international law
day in, day out ever since its inception, is simply not acceptable.

And now, to the "characteristics" of
Wizenthal's "typical cases", as seen in the Eichmann case study. I
shall start with a few quotations from JNV

"He was not driven by blood
lust." (p. 66)

"Eichmann's characteristic trait was
an intact emotional life in everything concerning his personal
sphere..." (p. 67)

"He was fully integrated into
Argentinian society - he was working, he was living within a
well-ordered family framework, and he was a good. father to his
children. " (p. 79)

"Besides, he was longing to see his
wife. Size had rented a place in Altaussee, Fischerndorf 8,...
" (p. 68)

"...her husband had done no more than
`his duty. What duty it was would have been a matter of indifference
to Frau Eichmann. Otherwise I can't explain why she did what she was
doing: she fought for Eichmann's escape to remain successful, and for
being able to live with him again. " (p. 70)

Again Wizenthal describes in detail the
Eichmanns' happy family life which he destroys, he describes in depth
the wife's loyalty and willingness to make sacrifices which his own
act of violence ultimately renders useless. One cannot help the
impression that there is an undertone of sick satisfaction to these
morbid, detailed descriptions of the innocent family members'
despair.

On p. 69 Wizenthal cites
SS-Obersturmbannführer Wilhelm Hottl as witness to
allegedly prove that Eichmann had known about the murder of six
million Jews.

In this context I refer the reader to page
of the present volume, where I have shown that Wizenthal himself
considers H6ttl to be a liar and a con artist and where you will find
out why this confidant of Eichmann's - across whose desk passed all
the death sentences imposed in the Southeast region - is permitted to
live in peace and quiet to this day, as reward for his false
testimony in Nuremberg. That this sole witness from the ranks of the
SS was

123

not summoned to attend the Eichmann trial in
Israel is further food for thought.

As in all the other cases discussed here,
Eichmann too did not live in a villa by the sea, profiting from the
"dental gold he had stolen from his victims", but rather supported
his wife and children by the sweat of his brow.

The account of his abduction by the criminal
Malklin is downright disgusting: in the Austrian newspaper Kurier
of June 21, 1992 we learn how the Jewish gangsters had watched
their unsuspecting prey through the drapes as he played tenderly with
his little son, kneeling on the floor with the child.

As in the other cases described herein,
Eichmann also did not at first flee his country, but returned home to
Upper Austria directly after the war. Here too, this man's
carefreeness and his wish to continue living in his homeland and in
the circle of his friends indicates a clear conscience.

Towards the end of his chapter on Eichmann
Wizenthal again repeats his cherished lie of "the seaside villas",
without considering that he himself has already refuted it through
his account of Eichmann's circumstances. He writes on p. 79:

"The Minister of Justice[Dr. Christian Broda]did not know what to say. If
his theory had been followed, all the Nazi murderers should have been
allowed to live on in their villas in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and
Paraguay."

Eichmann was sentenced to death in Israel
without the world ever learning what he had really said in that glass
cage in which he was kept imprisoned during the trial, and to this
day posterity is denied access to the trial files.

I consider that this conviction and
execution was not a just verdict, arrived at under the rule of law,
but murder. A murder that began with an abduction.

And under national and international law,
the man guilty of being accessory to murder in the Eichmann case is -
Szymon Wizenthal.

12

The Stangl
Case

Franz Stangl disputed (denied) the
existence of "gas chambers" in Treblinka, the camp that had been
under his charge as commandant. A Federal German court
sentenced him to "life imprisonment". Shortly afterwards he died of
unknown causes - one more victim of the most common cause of death
for "deniers".

Wizenthal opens his chapter about the
commandant of Treblinka, Franz Stangl, with a list of the items
stolen from the victims (JNV pp. 80-81). He supports his claims with
blather about a "document" signed by Odilo Globocnik which of course
has also never been made available for examination to the Federal
Criminal Police Office in Wiesbaden - probably perhaps it would then
have suffered the same fate as Demjanjuk's ID card (cf. pp. f.).

But you, dear reader, can see for yourself
what nonsense Wizenthal spoonfeeds his public. For example, in his
list (JNV p. 81) he claims that the inmates of Treblinka were
robbed of 400,000 gold watches and 145,000 kilos of gold wedding
rings.

400,000 gold watches are already a
considerable number for the alleged one million victims - almost
every male Jew to arrive in Treblinka would have to have owned one.
But the 145,000 kg - 319,000 pounds - of gold wedding rings deserve
special attention. I have consulted a local jeweler and have
concluded that in order to furnish the camp administration with
145,000 kg in gold wedding rings, at least 14,000,000 (fourteen
million) Jews would have to have been "delivered" and
"processed", to use Exterminationist terminology.

So much for Wizenthal's secret documents in
the Stangl case.

By citing SS-General Ohlendorfs statements
to document his charges against Stangl, Wizenthal makes my job easy:
I need only refer you to p. of this book, where you can find the
source that shows that Ohlendorf "confessed" only after gross
torture, and retracted these "confessions" in court in 1948. We shall
ignore Wizenthal's hate-filled tirades ("The Nazis were not just
murderers, they were robbers and murderers" - JNV p. 81) and his
unobjective generalizations. In the context of the Stangl case I
shall only remind the reader that to date no-one has been permitted
to examine the grounds of the Treblinka death camp, which are about
the size of a football field, in order to try to locate the enormous
mass graves where one million people were allegedly buried in huge
pits.

125

As in the other cases discussed here, Stangl
as well did not initially flee, but was apprehended in his home town
by the Americans. These, too, evidently did not consider him to be a
mass murderer, since he was assigned to outdoor forced labor, in the
course of which he then decided to escape. As in almost every other
case examined here, we find that Stangl had an intact family life;
and here too, Wizenthal cannot go without reveling in the Stangl
family's pain:

"When I checked out his family I was
informed by neighbors that Frau Stangl, along with her daughters, had
left Austria for an unknown destination on 6 May 1949."
(JNV p. 82-3 )

On pages 84-85 Wizenthal then
introduces an SS-man who, like most of the SS-men he receives in his
office, is an alcoholic, or corrupt and of base character at best. A
figure such as is not to be found among the real members of the SS in
my experience, Wizenthal simply pulls out of his hat here and informs
us that he bought Stangl's address from him for $7,000.

But what he learned again immediately
exposes as a lie his frequent claim that "the Nazis" lived
comfortably "in villas on the coasts of South America" on the
gold they had stolen from their victims.

Instead, Stangl supports his family by
working as a mechanic in the Volkswagen plant in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Not a single one of the men Wizenthal lists here as "typical" case
had ever bought even a single "villa" with "stolen gold"
anywhere along the coasts of Latin America, as Wizenthal's
propaganda fairy tale insists.

And again one can almost feel Wizenthal's
excited pleasure as he recounts how he lured the unsuspecting victim
into his trap:

":..requested a sister to phone the
Volkswagen plant with a message for Herr Stangl that his daughter had
had a road accident and was in hospital. He should come round at
once." (JNV p. 86)

On p. 86 Wizenthal admits that he had
instigated demonstrations against Stangl in Brazil. Once again he
manages effortlessly, with Senator Robert Kennedy's help, to enlist
the powers of the United States for his manhunt. Robert Kennedy
begins immediately to exert pressure on the Brazilian Ambassador in
Washington. The Federal Republic of Germany dutifully requests
Stangl's extradition and carries out the obligatory show trial.

In this case as well, Wizenthal is unable to
report the longed-for confession. "`I only did my duty,"' is
all he can quote.

On December 22, 1970 the court hands down
its verdict: life imprisonment. But Stangl, that stubborn denier,
already dies on June 28, 1971, not at all to the Wizenthal
Syndicate's displeasure.

126

As in almost all other cases, the Wizenthal
Victim's wife remains loyal to her husband beyond the grave. And once
again one can almost feel Wizenthal's satisfaction; he canot resist
in this case either - he must savor one last time Frau Stangl's
despairing words (JNV p. 92):

"`My husband was a decent, proper man
who did his duty,' she said about the work of the commandant of
Treblinka; `he never laid hands on an inmate..."

Gustav Wagner disputes (denies) the "gas
chambers" - as deputy commandant of Treblinka. Cardiac arrest - a
problem taking on epidemic proportions - strikes him twice during his
imprisonment but fails to kill him. But after his release he succumbs
to the fate that awaits most of the "deniers" among the witnesses: he
dies under mysterious circumstances.

The Wagner case also shows the standard
characteristics of Wizenthalian hunting methods. Like the other
"typical" cases described by Wizenthal, Wagner did not live in luxury
in a villa by the sea, paid for with the dental gold of his victims.
Like his superiors, Franz Stangl and Kurt Franz, the two camp
commandants of Treblinka, he denied that there was a "gas chamber" in
this camp: the selfsame "gas chamber" which, as we know, is based
primarily on the testimony of one single man, namely the false
witness Rosenberg, who was exposed during the Demjanjuk trial as a
most persistent professional false witness among the ranks of
Wizenthal's troops for the past half century (see p. of this book).

Wagner was evidently a dangerous man - with
dangerous opinions that might even have violated the Federal Republic
of Germany's laws which criminalize any denial of such "chambers",
regardless whether their alleged operation proceeded with steam or
non-toxic diesel exhaust. And to let such a dangerous man walk around
free was just out of the question.

Wizenthal begins, as he likes to do, with a
fairy tale. (See JNV p. 88ff.) He claims that on April 20, 1978, a
group of old Nazis had gathered at the Hotel Tyll in Sao Paulo
Province, Brazil, to celebrate Adolf Hitler's 89th birthday.
Wizenthal imagined that prominent "war criminals", particularly
Gustav Wagner, must have attended.

Even unincriminated former National
Socialists hold such birthday parties in private, with only their
closest family members, for reasons of safety; it is absolutely out
of the question that any "war criminal" anywhere should ever have
attended such a celebration in the public rooms of a hotel.

But Wizenthal does not even try to establish
the truth of this anecdote, and so this criminal case as well
continues as it began, as the pivot of a poorly-scripted thriller.

On p. 90 Wizenthal raves on, accusing Wagner
of fantastic crimes in connection with the "gas chambers" of
Treblinka:

"Anyone breaking ranks, resisting or
collapsing was killed by Wagner with his own hands. This continued
unchanged even when, in the summer of

129

1942, Stangl was appointed commandant
of the Treblinka concentration camp..."

We have already repeatedly established that
court records as well as witnesses (Kautsky) confirmed than any
violence by SS-men against prisoners was strictly forbidden, and that
this sort of energetic exercise of brute force by a camp commandant
was utterly unthinkable.

Wizenthal seems not to realize that in
spouting this particular story he simultaneously exonerates the
Ukrainian, Demjanjuk, and convicts his own false witnesses of lying:
for according to the imaginative accounts of the professional
witnesses Rosenberg and Epstein, it was not the camp commandant
himself who "personally killed anyone breaking ranks"; rather, this
dirty work was allegedly done by three Ukrainians, one of whom was
called "Ivan the Terrible".

Wizenthal also shakes the foundations of the
theory of "mass killings" in the Third Reich, which allegedly ensured
smooth operation by deceiving the victims (the "showers"!).

But Wizenthal has a surefire way of dealing
with any such objections: they are simply dismissed, with the
appropriate portion of outrage, as anti-Semitic provocation.

And in the very next breath, the
astonished reader learns that the Yugoslav partisans had murdered the
Germans prisoners (p. 91). With that, Wizenthal admits that a
hundred-thousand-fold war crime was committed against our front-line
soldiers - a war crime thirty times the magnitude of Katyn which has
never yet been so much as identified by the various Central European
Institutes for Contemporary History, nor queried by the Austrian and
German governments, nor criticized by the alleged "apostle of
justice", Szymon Wizenthal. Far be it from the latter in
particular to deign to hunt the murderers of innocent victims if
these victims were not Jews!

So Wizenthal is in possession of evidence
for what is probably the most extensive murder of prisoners in the
course of an armed conflict - but he keeps this evidence to himself.

The next moment we get another surprise:
Wizenthal invents a concentration camp named Risiera di San Sabba -
which he promptly obliterates again, probably to avoid being asked
for proof of its existence, which he could not provide.

"At the end of the war the Germans
blew up Risiera in order to obliterate all traces of it."
(JNV p. 91)

Even if we were to assume that this
"extermination camp", which not even the Allies' semi-official
historiography has heard of to date, actually

130

existed, and if we were to assume that it
really was blasted, Wizenthal still fails to explain how "the
Germans" managed to "blow up" even the "traces" of this camp.

Even an atomic bomb cannot obliterate
without a trace the foundations of a single-family home, i.e. the
traces it leaves in the earth.

Thus, Wizenthal's inability to explain
matters in relation to Treblinka (where we still lack any and all
evidence for the existence of a mass grave accommodating a million
people on an area the size of a football field) expands to include
his inability to explain the miracle of Risiera.

We are then treated to yet another one of
the tricks at the disposal of Wizenthal's criminological "one-man
operation":

"Chance carne to my aid: on a visit to
Israel I made the acquaintance of a Brazilian journalist, Mario
Chimanovich, of `Jornal do Brasil." (JNV p. 92)

Ali yes, what would Wizenthal be without
chance? The journalist which Wizenthal meets in Israel, of all
places, and whom he modestly calls a "Brazilian journalist", could of
course have been described just as well as a "Jewish journalist". But
they're only Jews when they are victims. When they are culprits they
call themselves American or Russians. Or Brazilians, as in this case.

Now the usual campaign begins, via the usual
media lever - in this case, the Jornal do Brasil. Chimanovich
did a good job. The daily press was full of accounts of gruesome
murders of the type that flourish in the sworn statements of the
false witnesses Rosenberg and Epstein.

In this situation Wagner once again failed
to act like an escaped mass murderer would. Instead, he did something
that must have struck Wizenthal as very dangerous: he "surrendered"
to the authorities and testified that there had been no "gas
chambers" and that therefore not even a single Jew could have died in
one.

Everything seemed to be conspiring against
Wizenthal's "one-man operation" which, however, obviously consists of
more than one person, since Wizenthal refers to his business in the
plural:

"That's what we thought. In .Tune 1979
the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil ruled that none of the
extradition applications was to be met." (JNV p. 94)

In this worrisome situation - which had
resulted from the fact that for the first time ever, a "denier of the
gas chambers" appeared of his own volition to argue on behalf of his
views which run counter to the semi-official historiography and the
criminal laws of Austria and Germany - Wizenthal was once again aided
by a stroke of extraordinary good luck: a stroke of luck

131

bordering on one of those miracles that line
the path of his life. During his imprisonment Gustav Wagner had
already suffered several heart attacks, though they failed to get rid
of him. But after he had been discharged from the hospital, he did
the Wizenthal Lobby the great favor of withdrawing to a remote farm
and hanging himself.

We do not know whether Wizenthal's
friends assisted him in this. But the law of averages alone makes one
think.

It is also interesting to see the accusation
which Wizenthal's witness for the prosecution, Szmajzner, makes in
the confrontation with Wagner before the Brazilian police, just as if
it were his reason for the decades-long hunt for Wagner. The former
inmate addresses his SS-commandant in quite a familiar tone (JNUp.
94):

"`How are you, Gustl?' Szmajzner
asked.

"For a moment Wagner regarded him with
bafflement, then he recognized him: `Yes, yes, I remember you weld
Surely I picked you out of the transport and saved your life.'

Strictly on the basis of instinct, I
personally am inclined to think that this witness statement i.e. the
account given of it has been distorted by Wizenthal. But let's assume
it were accurate:

In that case the witness confirms that death
in this camp was not dispensed individually by the accused man's
hand, but rather was initiated on orders from higher-up. Further, the
accusation contained in this statement shows that the accused ignored
these orders to "pick" the witness "out of the transport", thus
saving Szmajzner's life by an act of disobedience, the consequences
of which he was prepared to take.

The charge against Wagner, therefore -
the witness whose life he saved clearly says this - is that Wagner
did not also "save" other persons at grave risk to himself.

Such a shameless person who could accuse
his savior of murder is probably unique even in the history of
Wizenthal's troop of false witnesses, one should think. In fact,
however, locking up life-savers in the course of so-called "war
chimes trials" seems to be downright fashionable. I refer in this
context to Gottfried Weise, who was acknowledged to have saved a
Jewish girl's life at the risk of his own (p. ). An even more
grotesque example came in autumn 1992 in the Sabukoschek case (see p.
), where not one but several witnesses identified the accused as
being the man who had saved their lives.

132

Nonetheless Wizenthal prompted the
examining magistrate Buchgraber to order the defendant imprisoned
without delay.

Presuming that the story actually happened
the way Wizenthal describes it, then if Wizenthal and Szmajzner had
even a spark of decency and integrity in their souls they would not
have denounced the life-saver as war criminal, but would have seen to
it that a tree was planted in his honor on the "Avenue of the Just"
in Israel. But our Galician knows nothing of decency.

Wizenthal admits falsely accusing Eduard
Roschmann of murder. He calls it "planting a time bomb".

Roschmann dies of the cause that is
constantly nipping at the heels of "gas chamber" deniers (disputers):
cardiac arrest.

This case demonstrates like none other
Szymon Wizenthal's willingness to bear false witness against his
neighbor, without shame or any sense of guilt. It also reveals once
again that odd chord in the Galician's soul that can only be made to
resonate by reconstructing other people's fear and pain.

Wizenthal's account (JNUp. 96) begins with
the same story elements as other cases:

Eduard Roschmann, born in Graz on November
25, 1908, the deputy commandant of the Riga ghetto during the Third
Reich, is said by a witness from 1946 to have killed 3,800 Jews
(including 800 children under 10 years of age, of course) by
unspecified means, despite the fact that the iron laws of the Third
Reich precluded any such excesses. As in all other cases, the
unexamined witness statement in Wizenthal's possession rules out any
"presumption of innocence" such as the laws of all civilized nations
demand. Wizenthal always portrays his suspects as
already-convicted murderers, and treats them accordingly.

This is how Wizenthal has proceeded
countless times, and even though it is self-evident by now (Jagschitz
Report, Hv 5720/90) that various groups of witnesses have made false
claims and statements, a resumption of proceedings has never yet been
officially requested in any case.

As in almost every other case, the man
sought here by Wizenthal as "mass murderer" also returned after the
war - in this case in 1947 - to his homeland and rejoined his family
in Graz. Again, the alleged criminal deviates from Wizenthal's
blueprint which claims that the Nazis lived like lords in Latin
America, wallowing in money stolen from their victims.

On the contrary: Roschmann feels so
absolutely blameless that he even participates actively in an
organization considered to be "neo-Nazi". For this reason he is
arrested, and only later is he accused of having committed the
so-called war crimes, and handed over to Dachau. Only now that he
realizes what is being planned for him does he resolve to flee. And
he manages to do so one freezing cold winter night, through the
window of a train toilet compartment.

In pursuing this man, Wizenthal openly
avails himself of false accusations - as he himself admits.
Collaborating with the Jewish author

135

Frederik Forsyth and commissioned by the
Jewish director Fred Zinnemann, Wizenthal concocted a kettle of lies
in which Roschmann could be recognized despite the different name his
character was given.

"`I have read your book The Murderers
Among Us,' he said `You have a chapter there about the Odessa escape
organization. That would make a first-rate story for a film.'

"`And what do you want me to
do?'

"`You must supply me with the
historical background. Even in a thriller everything's got to be
correct.'" (JNV p. 96)

In the next sentence Wizenthal explains what
he means by "everything's got to be correct":

"It should be so it could really have
happened like that."

Wizenthal was in his element. Finally he was
able to vent his talents in the thriller and film industry. He
supplied the script author with the life story of Eduard Roschmann
from Styria - but tailored to fit Wizenthal's imagination, not the
way it really happened, and also not the way it "could" really have
happened (iron discipline of the SS order ruled out 3,500 individual
murders by one of its members, as Wizenthal alleges Roschmann
committed them in the Riga ghetto).

Now Wizenthal proceeds with an allegation of
treacherous murder against Roschmann in order to malign him before
the entire world. As he puts it:

"This enabled me to plant a further
time-bomb. I asked him [Forsyth] to insert a
scene which would make Roschmann lose the sympathies of his former
comrades. Forsyth had his fugitive shoot dead a German officer in
order to grab his place on an evacuation ship during the German
retreat." (JNV p. 99)

Thus, the slander of Roschmann - whom
Wizenthal charges with a fictitious murder motivated by the basest of
instincts and even openly admits his crime in his book - this slander
becomes the key to an understanding and explanation of this man and
the pleasure he takes in deception and fraud.

As in so many Wizenthal texts, here too a
reader would find strange examples of black humor if he had the
stomach for actually reading the diaries of this Marquis de Sade of
anti-German propaganda. Through press commentators Wizenthal saw to
worldwide publication of his claim that the evil movie Nazi, whose
screen name was Bergmann, was actually Eduard Roschmann, whom it had
been impossible to catch to date. And every amateur informant
worldwide promptly began to search for Roschmann. An American couple
even sent Wizenthal a glass bearing Roschmann's fingerprints; they
claimed he had drunk from that glass in a Brazilian restaurant. In

136

actual fact the accused had merely looked
like Maximilian Schell, the star of the movie "The Odessa File".

And so Wizenthal jokes:

"I consider it extremely lucky that no
one actually tried to detain Maximilian Schell."

What follows is pure Wizenthal routine:
spies who infiltrate BrazilianGerman circles betray Roschmann, who
sees himself forced to repeatedly change his name and residence.
Acting in his usual style, Wizenthal mobilizes his foremost hunting
weapon, namely the press of the Imperium.

At the close of this chapter all that is
left for him to do is to wallow in the hunted man's agony. How he was
discharged on July 5 after being arrested by the authorities; how
outraged Wizenthal & Co. were; and how Roschmann suffered a
circulatory collapse a short time later. And finally (JNV p.
102):

"But he was overtaken by another heart
attack: he had to be readmitted to hospital and there he died of
cardiac failure during the night of 10 August."

So Wizenthal was extraordinarily satisfied
with the success of his film and the script for his hunt. And anyone
who, moreover, enjoys the great good fortune that those "war
criminals" who are not arrested, extradited and convicted as desired
(or who fail to testify as is expected of them) almost always die of
"natural" causes at the right time, indeed has a good time as hunter.

The following quotation, with which I shall
conclude my account of the Roschmann case for the moment, speaks
volumes (JNV p. 102):

"A week later two Paraguayan
journalists brought me the dead man's fingerprints and a photo. The
picture shows a man hunted even in death."

With that, Szymon Wizenthal is perhaps the
only criminologist in the world and the only "one-man operation" in
this field who is so fortunate as to be able to count on the help of
journalists who bring a photograph 15,000 kilometers from halfway
around the globe and into his modest office in Vienna just so he can
gaze upon the likeness of "a man hunted even in death".

This too is probably something that sets
Wizenthal apart from the rest of the world's criminologists: that he
revels in photos of cases already closed, practically for some sort
of brownie points in his spare time (cf. JNV p. 134, "Plastic
Surgery"), and even documents this perverse pursuit neatly in his
diary of horror. The fact that Wizenthal spares a few lines at the
end of this chapter to tell of a bomb attack made by perpetrators
unknown against the house where the deceased had lived fits perfectly
into this diagnosis.

137

This strange drive which he is evidently
compelled to satisfy (see pp. ff, this volume) is thoroughly
documented by his book. It is a diary of an illness, a case-by-case
medical history.

15

The Mengele
Case

Josef Mengele, the concentration camp
physician of Auschwitz, did not feel that he was guilty of any
murders. Evidently he too "denied" the "gas chambers". He drowns
while bathing! The cause? You guessed it: heart attack. His
escape helper, Wolfgang Gerhard of Graz, died "in circumstances which
have not been entirely cleared up."

Like the other "typical" cases recounted by
Wizenthal, this one as well features a main character who is not
conscious of any guilt on his part. After the end of the war Mengele
returned to his home town of Gunzburg in the Federal Republic of
Germany where he lived as highly respected citizen among people who
had already held him and his family in the highest regard even before
the war.

What Wizenthal tries to make us believe in
every one of the cases at issue defies all criminological reason:
namely, that all these so-called "war criminals" were masters of
pretense who, before and after the crimes they are charged with, were
kind and helpful people with a strong sense of family and who had
turned into bloodthirsty, cruel, heartless monsters only from 1941 to
1945 - violating the laws of the Third Reich all the while.

It took until 1951 for Wizenthal's witnesses
to come knocking at the door of the man who was in perhaps the best
position to testify about the conditions in Auschwitz and no doubt
also about the existence of the so-called "gas chambers".

Wizenthal's "one-man" i.e. family operation
had done its preparatory work "internally" this time: Ella Lingens,
mother of the future Wizenthalsecretary and journalist laureate,
wrote a book which was evidently unsuited for publication in her
Austrian homeland and in the German language, which is why it had to
be published in English (as Prisoners of Fear). This book
brought an initial part of those charges which were later expanded
and enriched through the testimonies of other Wizenthal witnesses and
which ultimately served as the foundation necessary for the
persecution of the physician of Auschwitz.

When Dr. Mengele - thus forced to flee -
arrived in South America, he too failed to live (as Wizenthal
mendaciously claims with regard to his "war criminals") on stolen
Jewish dental gold, but rather took up his medical profession again
and began to practice medicine in Buenos Aires.

I don't know if Mengele, at least, spent his
exile living in a "villa on the sea" as described by Wizenthal.
However, if he had, he would not have needed stolen goods to do it,
just as he also resumed his professional duties

139

out of idealism rather than financial need;
after all, he and his family owned a worldwide business (Karl Mengele
and Sons) which enjoyed the support of a powerful partner in
Argentina (Fadro Farm KG SA).

The charge brought against Mengele by
Wizenthal's in-house witness, Mother Lingens - namely, that the chief
physician of Auschwitz had had to be kept in the dark about the
spread of the 1942 typhus epidemic to prevent the sick Jews from
being sent into "the gas" - is really a bit much, and it casts
downright criminal doubts on the theory of the existence of a
so-called "gas chamber" in Auschwitz. Frau Lingens evidently forgot
that according to official historiography, people were "gassed" for
being Jewish, not for having an infectious disease! If the disease
had been the reason for which they were killed, this would be a
denial of the racially motivated genocide.

Besides that, the danger of typhus - a
disease spread by lice and one which had cropped up in various
concentration camps as well as among the German Wehrmacht and the
civilian population - already concerned the German authorities to
such a degree that they had already begun at this point to construct
52 crematoria ovens in Auschwitz, with whose aid more than 150 bodies
of typhus victims could be cremated per day, in accordance with the
state of cremation technology of that time. That a physician of the
stature of Dr. Mengele should be the only one from whom such an
epidemic could be kept hidden must be banished into the realm of
Allied propaganda lies.

Wizenthal hesitantly adds that there is an
account of Dr. Mengele personally stabbing a child, but it seems that
even he has doubts about the usefulness of this witness statement,
for he hastens to add: "...but I think this may be based on
mistaken identification. "

Just who might have been mistakenly
identified as the well-known chief surgeon of Auschwitz is something
the Galician doesn't bother to share with us.

To date, those Revisionists who claim that
at the time of the alleged mass murder a terrible typhus epidemic had
raged in the concentration camps, and that the bodies of its victims
were burned in the crematoria, are routinely accused of spreading
neo-Nazi propaganda lies - as I myself experienced from the nasty
activities of the press during my trial in May 1992. Anyone who
claimed in court, as I did, that the barracks had to be treated with
disinfectants (Zyklon B) to curb the spread of the typhus, was met
with pure scorn. But now, at long last, we hear this from Wizenthal
himself, who seems to have grown somewhat incautious in his old age:

"Without heart stimulants typhus can
almost never be survived by a weakened person. And without a
disinfectant which destroys the lice it cannot be fought
....

140

"In consequence the block was empty
and could be disinfected." (JNV p. 106)

This is where one should ask
Wizenthal:

Might the documented orders and supplies
of this insecticide Zyklon B, which was designed to kill lice and
thus to combat typhus, not also indicate that the substance was
ordered and supplied for this purpose?

But the following sentence really makes one
sit up and take notice:

"We know now that this meningeal
inflammation, which is carried by lice, on some days killed more
people in the Polish camps than even the Nazis could put to death in
the gas chambers." (JNV p. 106 )

If this had been said, not by Wizenthal but
by some Central European non-Jew, one could confidently call this
"trivializing National Socialist crimes" - as per the new Austrian
"gas chamber law" instigated by Wizenthal himself. Even if said
epidemic had not, as Wizenthal states, "on some days killed more
people" than "the Nazis" had allegedly murdered, but had
only killed the same numbers or even a few less, this would still
mean that Wizenthal upsets his own entire victim count no less
thoroughly than he upsets that of all of semi-official
historiography. For there are only two ways out of this trap in which
the evil old man has caught himself with that sentence:

Either fully six million "extra" Jews died
in the concentration camps of the typhus epidemic, above and beyond
the six million alleged "gassees". But in that case the number of
Jews living in the whole world at that time must be increased from 15
to 21 million. Or, alternately, six million was actually the correct
number of Jews, but then Wizenthal has falsely imputed to the Germans
the murders of three million who actually died of an epidemic which
the Germans desperately fought to stem.

Since the number of victims for Auschwitz
alone (cf. Prof. Jagschitz, Hv 5720/90) has already had to be reduced
by 2.5 to 3 million, and since the number of "gassees" alleged after
the war for the Mauthausen camp has similarly had to be reduced from
at least two million to some 2,000, the remaining number of victims
will for the moment have to be corrected by fully another 1.5 million
- by the authority of Wizenthal's worst enemy: simple mathematics.

For the sake of a more complete
understanding it is necessary to note here that the epidemics
described began to rage in the German concentration camps precisely
at the time when the disinfectant Zyklon B began to be supplied to
the "extermination camps". This was the same time for which
semi-official historiography alleges the beginning of the "gassing of
Jews" and claims that this Zyklon B was diverted from its original
purpose, namely

141

the crucial disinfestation of the camps, and
was used instead to commit mass murder.

The physician whom Wizenthal, with the aid
of Mother Lingens, portrays as murderer was characterized by a
profound willingness to help wherever help was needed, which earned
him the friendship and loyalty of all who knew him. Even the mayor of
his home town Gfnzburg, Dr. Seitz, took his side and Wizenthal claims
that the inhabitants of that city acted like a group of conspirators
when Mengele's father passed away and the hunted son returned home
for the funeral with the entire town's knowledge, without even one
person being willing to betray his presence.

Wizenthal also spends somewhat more time
than necessary on Mengele's wife Martha, whom he ordered followed and
spied-on. Despite being fully aware that the family members and
friends of "war criminals" are particularly in danger of violent
attacks, Wizenthal's concept of morality and justice does not stop
him from exposing the poor woman's hiding place. On page 111 of his
book he writes:

"She moved to Merano and has been
living there ever since, at Via.. "

True to Wizenthal's style, Mengele's son and
the firm's attorney are also exposed with their full names. A bit of
collective family liability, a bit of collective guilt and a bit of
collective responsibility - where it doesn't help, it doesn't hurt
either, or so our macabre fiend evidently thinks.

A house search conducted at the firm of
Mengele & Sons on February 7, 1979 on Wizenthal's request turned
up files that showed that Mengele had died in the course of a
swimming vacation - of a heart attack.

In 1984 Wizenthal received a friend in
Vienna (let's hope it wasn't in his humble office). Said visitor may
even have been Wizenthal's boss. He was none less than Neal Shaer of
the American "Office of Special Investigations" (OSI). Shaer has
gained a sort of notoriety among those "in the know" through his
involvement with the Waldheim campaign (with which, however,
Wizenthal claims to have had no involvement) and through the
procurement of the forged documents that led to John Demjanjuk's
death sentence. But Shaer did not do Wizenthal the honor of a visit
just to take care of the unpaid telephone bills or postal charges
incurred by the Galician's touching "one-man operation". Rather, his
objective - if we can believe Wizenthal - was further spying on the
Mengele firm and its lawyer, the German citizen Sedlmayer.

Mengele's death probably also involved
mysterious circumstances, as even Wizenthal admits. The 70-year-old
had suffered a heart attack while swimming in a lake. This cause of
death is one which we find recorded in

142

Wizenthal's annals (albeit only among his
enemies) with a frequency that defies all medical statistics.

But Wizenthal reveals more (p.
113):

A former SS-man, Wolfgang Gerhard, had once
rendered Mengele an invaluable service by giving him his identity
card to enable him to flee to Argentina.

Since this abetment had lapsed and could no
longer be prosecuted, Wolfgang Gerhard could not be taken to task for
his helpfulness. So chance once again came to the Wizenthal
Syndicate's aid - as it regularly does. Wizenthal puts it thus:

"Wolfgang Gerhard died in Graz shortly
afterwards, in circumstances which have not been entirely cleared
up." (.INV p. 113-114.)

Another interesting detail is that Dr.
Munch, the only doctor of Auschwitz who had to be acquitted in Cracow
in 1947 on the basis of overwhelming witness testimony
confirming his energetically humane conduct, also stood by Mengele
and his family, and got together with them in 1982 for a
conversation which was secretly listened in on by Wizenthal. In the
course of this conversation Dr. Munch assessed what theoretical
possibility of an acquittal his friend Dr. Mengele would have had if
he had voluntarily turned himself in to the German authorities.

Obviously Dr. Munch also did not consider
the accused mass murderer to be guilty in any way.

Wizenthal concludes this chapter with a
theoretical question to Dr. Mengele:

"How can you reconcile what you have
done with the Hippocratic oath, which makes it your duty to help
people?"

In turn I would like to direct an equally
theoretical question at Wizenthal:

How did the three Jewish doctors (see p. of
this volume) who betrayed a patient and deliberately disfigured him -
based on an unfounded suspicion, as it later turned out - and who
detained him in the hospital unnecessarily on false pretenses and at
his own expense, reconcile this with the Hippocratic oath you cite
here so hypocritically?

In your informers' case, you felt that
"the 'Jew' within the surgeon had come out on top. " You
thought that was funny.

But any such proof is lacking in the Mengele
case. Therefore I request that this case be reopened. For as long as
no serious witnesses and no serious and verifiable documents are
presented, and for as long as no scientific

143

expert witnesses are allowed to be heard in
the Auschwitz issue, Dr. Mengele must be presumed innocent, a right
to which your three surgeons in whom "the Jew came out on top" have
forfeited their claim.

16

The Heim Case

An outstanding army medical officer of
the Second World War is described as a killer who murdered for
personal satisfaction. Dr. Aribert Heim gets away.

As in all the other "typical" cases,
Wizenthal here introduces a man who, he says, had been a decent human
being and an outstanding doctor all his life - before the war, after
the war and during the war - and who allegedly turned into a
murderous rampaging monster only during "those short phases in the
Buchenwald and Mauthausen concentration camps".

Wizenthal puts this to the astonished
layperson - and probably to the no less astonished criminologist - as
follows (JNV p. 121):

"In Dr. Heim's life there were only
those short phases in the Buchenwald and Mauthausen concentration
camps during which, one is tempted to say, by chance, he found an
opportunity forgiving vent, as though in a frenzy, to a latent
bestiality and an obvious tendency to sadism."

Wizenthal offers similar explanations with
regard to almost every one of his victims, probably in order to
bridge the discrepancies between his allegations and the testimonies
of the victims' fellow man. Not one of those whom he accuses ever
fell victim to this "latent bestiality" again, before or after. It
almost seems as though Wizenthal has discovered a new kind of mental
illness, though he has not seen fit to inform the orthodox medical
establishment. Perhaps he could successfully claim a Nobel Prize in
medicine, with psychiatry as the area of specialty, in lieu of the
Nobel Peace Prize which he has striven for in vain so far and with
which he wanted to follow in the footsteps of the mass murderer Begin
(bombing of the "King David Hotel" in Jerusalem)!

On the very same page Wizenthal alleges that
Aribert Heim and other doctors "performed typhus experiments on
prisoners". In light of the raging epidemic, to artificially infect
inmates with typhus (as Wizenthal evidently hopes to suggest there)
would be like carrying coals to Newcastle and equals in its idiocy
only the "test gassing" at Dachau, where even official accounts state
that there never was a functioning gas chamber. (The "gas chamber of
Treblinka", which according to Wizenthal's witnesses "held 12,000
victims" - which equals the capacity of the Deutschlandhalle -
would hardly have required this technology to be tested in the
barracks of Dachau.)

Regarding the concentration camp doctors,
who risked their lives day after day to combat a deadly epidemic with
inadequate medical supplies and insufficient quantities of
medication, Wizenthal, instead of being content

145

with accusations against the regime, trucks
out a whole host of hair-raising allegations (p. 117):

"Not only did they make the selection
of victims in the concentration camps, but almost invariably they
were ready to commit individual murder."

On page 118 he continues:

":..that the physician must kill in
accordance with his professional ethics in order to prevent something
worse - the Judaification of Germany or the spread of inherited
diseases."

Whereas the historiography of the
Establishment describes "mass killings in the Third Reich" as a
politically decreed and "industrially" performed crime, Wizenthal -
in a deliberate twisting of even the official account - alleges that
the German medical profession, collectively, demanded and carried out
the murder of Jews as a sanitary measure.

In truth there is not so much as one single
document that substantiates this monstrous lunacy.

Regarding surgeons in general, in other
words not only the German ones, Wizenthal informs us (p. 119):

"This requires a very slight inclination
to sadism, of which the person concerned is not even aware. "

That might make surgeons around the world
pause in their dedicated battle to save human lives, sit up and take
notice. Wizenthal tries, poorly and in vain, to tone down a bit:

"I do not, therefore, mean any offence
when I say that a slight tendency towards sadism may be found a bit
more frequently among medical men than among others."

Szymon Wizenthal, who talks constantly about
sadism, and who charges physicians around the world with latent,
subconscious sadism without being able to cite any sources in his
support, indulges far too long and with too much enjoyment in
accounts of horror which he cannot document in any case, not to set
himself up for exactly the same charge that he in his senility makes
against the members of a profession which, with few exceptions (for
example the three New York surgeons in whom "the Jew" won out over
the doctor), have committed their lives to the service of their
fellow man.

I quote the following sections from
Wizenthal's book with reluctance and deep disgust, for the sole
reason that it is necessary to do so in order to expose Wizenthal's
perverted drive. On page 120 he quotes one of his false witnesses who
testified against Dr. Heim, a man who had valiantly done his duty as
medical officer of the "Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler" and the SS
division "Nordland" in all hot spots of the Second World War:

146

"The doctor opened up the
anaesthetized man's chest and abdomen in order, as he said, to study
the internal organs `in vivo': `This is the first time that I can see
in a live person how his stomach works.' In front of the eyes of his
flabbergasted assistant Dr. Heim then picked up his scalpel and,.
just as if he were dissecting a corpse, cut out one organ after
another. After he had cut out the heart as well he had the body
pushed aside and called for a second patient. With him, too, like an
excellent student anxious to demonstrate his skill, he neatly laid
bare the organs and then, with a swift cut, removed them This time,
however, he remembered that the young man's oral cavity had also
interested him, and so he extracted a tooth. After that he
extinguished the last remnants of life, if any were left in the body,
by an injection into the heart."

If I were a judge in a trial where a witness
stated this sort of thing, I would have him arrested right there in
the courtroom. Every time a doctor opens up an abdominal cavity he
can see how the stomach works in a live person, and anyone who
doesn't know that has never assisted in an operation. What Wizenthal
alleges as a "war criminal's" first-time experience flies in the face
of even a public school student's medical knowledge.

In Recht, nicht Rache, the German
original of Justice Not Vengeance, Wizenthal actually has Dr.
Heim remove the organs of the second body twice; but how one can
remove, "with a few swift cuts", the vital organs one has already cut
out, is something that the author Wizenthal, wallowing in blood and
body parts like Marquis de Sade, will have to explain to us.

But how one can take a torso from which one
has already "neatly" removed the "organs" (i.e. liver, kidneys,
stomach, pancreas, lungs and gall bladder as well as the intestines)
and then wish to "extinguish the last remnants of life" by an
"injection into the heart" remains Wizenthal's wellkept secret.
Aiding death in this way, as he imputes to Dr. Aribert Heim, seems
rather superfluous. But to our Galician, accuracy in details is a
waste of time.

Dr. Heim, portrayed by Wizenthal as a
demented murderer, acted just like his other fellow victims who had
also been denounced by Wizenthal, namely, in a manner completely out
of character for people who have incurred guilt before witnesses:
after being released from captivity, he returned to Mannheim in 1948
as specialist in gynecology, and married a colleague.

It was 1962 by the time Wizenthal had got
all his "witness testimony" together.

147

However, when the German police - the last
link in the social hierarchy of Wizenthal's henchmen - came knocking
on Dr. Heim's door, he was no longer available to the Wizenthal
Mafia. He got away from his persecutors.

Like all those whom Wizenthal portrays as
bloodthirsty criminals, Dr. Heim as well was able to rely on his
family and friends after his successful escape.

Perhaps out of anger because relatives could
not be forced to inform on their kinsman, Wizenthal gets even, in a
way that is typical of his sick drive. He mentions the escapee's
sister in his book, with her full name and address, just as he has
also done in other cases, in accordance with his tenets of family
liability and collective guilt.

Wizenthal did get some small satisfaction in
this case:

Drawing on the Four Power Statute, i.e. the
occupation law of the Allied victors of Second World War - and this
is a subject the Galician knows like the back of his hand - he lodged
a complaint with the denazification tribunal of Berlin, where Dr.
Heim was convicted in absentia on June 13, 1979 on the basis
of Wizenthal's line-up of witnesses.

The German judge Dr. Wolfgang Neesmann, in
his long-distance diagnosis based on occupation law, concluded that
Dr. Heim had committed the crimes he was charged with, and had done
so out of sheer desire to kill. With that, Wizenthal gained at least
a small triumph: Dr. Heim was sentenced in his absence to a fine of
510,000 Deutschmarks. Even though Wizenthal's sick drive went
unsatisfied this time and the victim got away, he is left the
consolation of watching the restitution money roll in.

17

The Braunsteiner
Case

After 17 years of persecution, Hermine
Braunsteiner, the wife of an American construction worker, was
extradited to the Federal Republic of Germany and sentenced to life
in prison. I request that the proceedings be reopened!

Wizenthal closes his chapter about the
Braunsteiner case (JNV p. 139) with a cheeky reference to the
Demjanjuk case and comments triumphantly that Hermine Ryan nee
Braunsteiner could only be put on trial because, like the Ukrainian,
she had first been stripped of her American citizenship.

As the reader can see from the chapter about
the Demjanjuk case, this man's innocence has been thoroughly
established by the journalist Hans Peter Rullmann, by the exposure of
the document forgery perpetrated by the Russian secret service, by
the perjury committed by the witnesses for the prosecution, and by
the exposure of a world-wide false-witness procurement machinery
consisting of the American "Office of Special Investigations" (OSI),
the highest echelons of the Israeli justice system, and Szymon
Wizenthal's "one-man operation" in Vienna. Even the Jewish newspaper
SemitTimes under its editor-in-chief Abraham Melzer today
openly accuses the Israeli justice system and the American
authorities of having known from the start that the man thus
sentenced to death was innocent, and sacrificing him nonetheless, for
the sake of political interests.

At the time the book discussed here was
published, Wizenthal too must have been aware of Demjanjuk's proven
innocence. But even if he was not, it is a fact that to date
Wizenthal has expressed not so much as a word of regret and
rectification with regard to the tragedy of John Demjanjuk. With this
in mind, let us consider the case of Hermine Ryan nee Braunsteiner.

In 1964 Wizenthal selected Hermine
Braunsteiner as victim. The scope for his selection wasn't very
large, since most of the concentration camp guards, of which
Braunsteiner had been a female member, had been killed in cold blood
right after "liberation". Wizenthal glosses over this butchery by
implying instead a very lenient justice system (.INV p. 143):

"Eighty out of the 1300 members of
tire SS who had belonged to the camp staff were convicted. Hermine
Braunsteiner was not among them. But then I found her, to my
surprise, in our list of people sentenced in Austria for Nazi
crimes."

Wizenthal - who tries to give the impression
that there were a great number of SS men from the camp guard staff
who were neither murdered nor ever charged - makes things easy for
himself. He doesn't need to search

149

for those who were butchered or who died
during interrogation. Those few who were able to flee fill his books
anyhow. And so he scours the list of those who regained their freedom
after serving shorter sentences. From everything we know of
Wizenthal's modus operandi, and especially from the actions of
accused, we must conclude that the eyewitness testimony and the
accusations contained therein were not tailor-made until after
the victim, Hermine Ryan nee Braunsteiner, had been chosen.

And indeed, as in all cases discussed here
and described as "typical" by Wizenthal himself, the victim
Braunsteiner evidently lacks that sense of guilt that normally marks
people who have done wrong. She returned to her home after the war
without hiding or attempting to conceal her identity, only to be then
accused by several female inmates (formerly under her charge) of
having slapped them, for which she was sentenced to three years in
prison; and after emigrating to the United States she displayed a
deportment that is completely atypical of guilty criminals.

At this point we must add that Hermine Ryan
nee Braunsteiner also did not live the high life on stolen dental
gold and in villas by the sea, but was a housewife married to an
American construction worker and lived in a small home paid for by
scrimping and saving. And we must also mention that after Szymon
Wizenthal had targeted his victim, he initiated the usual tactics.
This time he gives a rather diffident account of how he launched his
media campaign (JNV p. 149):

"In order to find out about such a
complex problem in a foreign country(he means the
problem of stripping someone of their citizenship) the best
course is to turn not to an official but to a journalist. In this
particular case it was Clyde Farnsworth, the henna correspondent of
the New York Times who, a few months earlier, had published a lengthy
article about me in the weekly supplement of his paper, entitled...
"

If you, dear reader, should wish to find out
about a complex problem in a foreign country, then - at least if you
are not Jewish - you will have a hard time obtaining a hearing, help
or information by turning to the media. After all, Wizenthal too did
not turn to the New York Times like some naive tourist- he
came to give the order for the usual sort of campaign with which he
inaugurates his manhunts. That also follows from his statements just
a few lines later, where he makes an involuntary confession, as it
were:

"A mere ten days later, on 14 June
1964, the Braunsteiner story appeared in the `New York Times' under
the title `Former Nazi Camp Guard Is Now a Housewife in Queens' and
caused an enormous stir. "

In any nation under the rule of law, the
pre-conviction of an accused by the press is considered illegal and
can be punished by law, by criminal

150

charges and the confiscation of the
offending newspaper. It is typical of all of Wizenthal's manhunts
that the persecution of his victims is initiated by such illegal and
despicable pre-convictions by the press, and that in not a single
case was a paper ever confiscated or called to account for its
unlawful activities.

But what was it that the woman who was
accused of the brutal murder of a child, and whose picture had been
dragged through the American press as a sadist, said in her despair
to the reporter who came knocking at her door to complete his dirty
assignment (JNV, p. 150):

"I've suffered enough. You keep
talking on the radio about peace, I have a claim to be left in peace
too. Is this never going to end?"

Those are not the words of a
murderess.

The actions of her husband are also not
those of a man who "suddenly sees the light", but those of one who is
prepared, out of deep conviction and affection, to defend his wife
with every means at his disposal. Here again we see Wizenthal's
strange lingering over the pain and despair he has caused innocent
people, a lingering that has nothing to do with his "criminological"
work or with the account of this case, a lingering that might well be
the key to the despicable lifework of this fiend.

"Hermine Braunsteiner's husband...
defended his wife with American hyperbole: `She's the best woman in
the world, she wouldn't hurt a fly! :.. For his wife to have
committed any kind of crime was unthinkable to him

"Which it was equally to all the
acquaintances and neighbours of the Ryans. Mrs.
Ryan was described as particularly pleasant, an excellent
wife, and invariably helpful to a stranger who might be in need of
anything. When she'd moved into the neighbourhood she had called on
all her neighbours to introduce herself and she'd not allowed that
contact to break off since." (JNV p. 150. )

As Wizenthal and his trial strategy would
have it, this most "pleasant woman" the neighbors knew, and
"the best woman in the world" whom husband Russell could
imagine, and who according to a Viennese neighbor had been one of the
nicest children that neighbor had known, had for a brief time (one
year) turned into a raging beast - just like the other Wizenthal
Victims as well, and uniformly in contradiction of all criminological
and psychological norms. In violation of the strict laws of the Third
Reich, and contrary to all reliable accounts of the realities of that
time, she allegedly killed a child, individually and publicly, by
shooting it in the face! Out of sadism.

151

And Wizenthal expects his readers to believe
the justification he gives them for his persecution and prosecution
in the Braunsteiner case and his other "typical" cases (JNV p.
151):

"If they had then been pleasant,
helpful people, good to their husbands and children, they were just
the same now. If someone who knew them heard that they had whipped
women and children in a camp, he would think it just as unlikely as
that he himself might commit such atrocities. [...] Is it
conceivable that people can totally expend their damned-up
[sic] sadism at a certain time in their lives, afterwards
behave amiably, and without aggressiveness? Or, vice versa, is it
possible that the aggression which, under the perverse conditions of
a concentration camp, manifested itself as sadism, manifests itself
as cordiality to other people the moment the person concerned lives
under human conditions?"

No, it is not possible, worthy Wizenthal,
and it is not conceivable that in all the cases you describe, kind,
pleasant, helpful, respected, wellloved people who had exhibited
these qualities all their lives should have completely abandoned
their character for a few years, contrary to all psychological and
medical findings, just to accommodate your damned Jewish false
witnesses and your criminal anti-German mission!

The tragedy of Hermine Ryan nee Braunsteiner
played out in accordance with the rules of the Wizenthalian Hunt:

After four years of martyrdom following the
first media attack against Braunsteiner in 1964, application was made
to revoke the victim's citizenship, and on September 28, 1971,
after a total of seven years, that application was translated
into action by Chief Justice Jakob Mischler of the Brooklyn Federal
District Court. On June 30, 1981, after a total of 17 years of
persecution, the Federal German puppet court, ignoring the numerous
testimonies in Braunsteiner's defense, passed its disgraceful
verdict: imprisonment for life.

And now Wizenthal can once again indulge in
his longed-for pleasure. He can linger over his victims' despair and
misery, and he does so in the rapture of his sick drive, recorded for
us in writing in the book at hand:

"Hermine Ryan, the only remaining
defendant, was sentenced to life imprisonment. She received the
verdict stiffly and blankly. Only later, when the meaning of the
sentence began to sink in, was she overtaken by self-pity, producing
a handkerchief and wiping tears from her eyes." (JNV p.
157.)

Even if one could try to explain Wizenthal's
hovering over Hermine Ryan-Braunsteiner's tears with his insatiable
hatred born of the persecution of the Jews in the Third Reich, the
thoroughness with which he savors her

152

husband's despair leaves no doubt that
Wizenthal is in fact a man whose accomplishments in his strange
chosen profession are the product of his morbid psyche (p. 153):

"Only Braunsteiner's American husband
continued, undismayed, to collect written statements from neighbours
and acquaintances in Queens, which all portrayed Mrs. kvan as a
blameless, reserved and friendly person. But this signature campaign
was unable to halt the course of developments: on 6 August 1973
Hermine Braunsteiner was expelled from the USA and, escorted by
German police officers, taken by Lufthansa to the Federal
Republic."

And thus Wizenthal enjoyed every single
stage of the thorny path trodden by the simple American construction
worker Russell Ryan who fought desperately and with inadequate means
against an overwhelming power.

After the verdict Wizenthal cannot help
himself, he must delve into the innocent husband's pain just once
more - albeit in a less lurid fashion this time:

"Her husband, Russell Ryan, who was
among the spectators in the courtroom, commented on the verdict: `I
am disappointed. I expected an acquittal.'"

Wizenthal wasn't disappointed. He was well
satisfied. Until next time.

18

The Kutschmann Case

With the aid of Jews and the Jewish
Masonic lodge B'nai Brith, Walter Kutschmann is hunted for eight
years, and finally arrested. As "denier of the gas chambers".

Even though "witnesses" turned up who had
"miraculously" survived and now alleged that Kutschmann had murdered
a young girl, his extradition was refused. Little wonder, therefore,
that Kutschmann promptly succumbed to - you guessed it! - a
heart attack; especially since he had denied the "gas chambers".

I hope I shall not tire my readers with the
constant repetition of the same features.

Like the other victims of Wizenthal's
illegal manhunts, Dr. Walter Kutschmann also did not live on stolen
dental gold and in a villa by the sea, but rather with his sister in
Buenos Aires, where he made his living as wageearner. Like all the
others pre-convicted by Wizenthal and branded as monsters, he too was
a respected and popular man, and gainfully employed as head of
publicity by the firm "Osram". And as always, the hunt began with a
media campaign, so that one could almost believe that all the
journalists in the Western world are at Wizenthal's beck and call. On
p. 170 Wizenthal reveals:

"I invited a journalist from Vision, a
magazine widely read both in South America and the United States, and
told him what I knew about Kutschmann." (JNV p. 170)

Here too, Wizenthal downplays the
significance of his conversation with the journalist, for in the very
next sentence we learn that it was not only a matter of giving
information to the press, but rather an assignment. The journalist
serves both as the detective and as the bait! "Under the
pretext of interviewing (Kutschmann) about cooperation between the
USA and Argentina in the field of electrification, the man from
'Fision' succeeded in taking the first up-to-date photo of
Kutschmann, and shortly afterwards the magazine ran several pages on
his story."

For lack of space we shall dispense with a
blow-by-blow recap of the eight years of persecution inflicted on
Kutschmann, who, incidentally, was released again after his first
arrest. But one quotation from Wizenthal's pen is of fundamental
significance because in it Wizenthal comments on the trial-

154

strategic necessity of imputing crimes to
his victims which they had allegedly committed themselves personally
(JNU p. 168):

"A few years later we received a
witness's deposition to the effect that Kutschmann had personally
shot dead a young Jewish girl in Drohobycz. At the time this seemed
to us to be a side-track - I had become so accustomed in my work to
think almost invariably in hundreds of dead (the old fraud
understates the matter) - but in the event this murder turned out to
be the only one with which the German judiciary chose to concern
itself in greater detail."

This reveals the Wizenthalian strategy:
since witness statements that allege thousands or hundreds of
thousands of executions are not credible because the courts find it
difficult to accept that witnesses speaking from the restricted
perspective of their imprisonment can, on the one hand, accurately
judge the extent of such a mass murder and, on the other hand,
accurately understand the command structures and the personalities of
the perpetrators, their involvement, and thus the personal share of
the individual's guilt. Wizenthal already recognized years ago that
the charge of individual, personally committed murder is
indispensable for successfully obtaining a conviction.

And he acted accordingly. It is also
noteworthy that both the charge and the witness against Kutschmann
were found only after the arrest had already been made.

Regardless of the fact that this kind of
individual crime was alleged very rarely during the immediate
post-War trials, and that the strategy of those making the
accusations back then was to allege an industrial-style genocide,
ordered by Hitler and carried out with the deception of the victims
("shower baths"), in which the guilt of the SS guards lay not in
their undisciplined, sadistic excesses but rather in their
zombie-like obedience, Wizenthal and his team realized that in the
long term this would not serve to guarantee the success rate they
expected from the German justice system.

This is also the only explanation for the
fact that by far the bulk of these allegations of individual murder
were made by that small clique of ever-resurfacing witnesses, not
immediately after the War when their memories would yet have been
fresh and vivid, but only now - decades or even half a century
later! Precisely at the time where the stage production requires
them.

Woe to him who speaks today of a
world-wide imperial Jewish power, much less identifies Freemasonry as
its Head! He will be branded as "extremist" and "anti-Semite" in any
case. Beyond that, he will be dismissed as a nutcase who imagines
things.

155

The way in which the media of the Western
world serves as execution machinery in the preparations for the
"judicial murders" described here on the basis of information
provided by Wizenthal himself must make a critically-minded reader
stop and think. For the first time, however, in this book, Wizenthal
himself names the militant vanguard organization of the Jewish
Masonic lodge B'nai B'rith and fits it into the great,
continent-spanning puzzle (JNYp. 172):

"The head of the South American
section of the Anti-Defamation League, Rabbi Morton Rosenthal,
thereupon requested an audience in order to draw the president's
(with reference to the then Argentinean President Raul Alfonsin)
attention to the Kutschmann case."

But the organization thus specified is
neither so broken-backed as to have access to only the Argentinean
"upper echelons", nor is it so limited in its scope and goals as to
expend all its energy on its actual task, which would be to combat
the defamation of the waves of immigrants the organization itself has
triggered. In the very next sentence we learn:

"Simultaneously, my friend Eliot
Welles, head of the Nazi Crimes Department of the Anti-Defamation
League in the USA, declared himself willing, on his trip to Europe,
to call on the public prosecutor's office in Berlin and establish
whether, in view of the new situation in Argentina (the
witness had just remembered, right on time after a 40-year delay, the
individual murder of a 16-year-old girl), it was at last
prepared to make a request for Kutschmann's extradition."
(JNU p. 172. )

Nothing can top witnesses in the right place
at the right time. And nothing can beat working together towards a
common goal.

I'd like to see the "Carinthian Home
Association" try to get the public prosecutor's office in Berlin or
the Argentinean president to grant them an audience, just like that.
But, well, some associations are more equal than others.

Despite all these efforts, the rather
unenthusiastic German request for Kutschmann's extradition seems not
to have had great chances for success. Kutschmann was released from
jail.

And here again, that fortunate coincidence
which awaits Wizenthal's juridically unsuccessful cases made its
timely appearance. On August 30, 1985 Kutschmann was taken to a
hospital where, like most of his fellowsufferers discussed here, he
died of cardiac arrest.

19

The Brunner
Case

The man second in importance only to
Eichmann disputes the existence of the "gas chambers". He survives
two attempts on his life. Would-be assassins operate out of Austria,
the Nazi hunter's "homeland". To date the police have not seen fit to
interrogate Szymon Wizenthal of Galicia, even though the suspect's
readiness to take violent action (kidnapping of Eichmann) is publicly
known.

Wizenthal denies the "gas chamber" of
Auschwitz: as substitute, he tries to make us believe in the "gas
van": A slap in the face of "research into contemporary history".

In the course of his media campaigns
Wizenthal has routinely given his victims nicknames, colorful
epithets reminiscent of Oriental fairy tales.

Just as John Demjanjuk, an innocent man
sentenced to death, was called "Ivan the Terrible", just as Franz
Novak, "Stationmaster of Death", was laid open for attack by the
press, just as the innocent, kind-hearted SS-man Gottfried Weise was
presented as "Tell of Auschwitz", and just as the tragic figure of
Hermine Braunsteiner was exploited as "the Mare", Alois Brunner was
presented by Wizenthal as "the Right Hand of the Devil". His
principal achievement, Wizenthal says, was "the invention of Jewish
collaboration". By which Wizenthal means to say that when Jews
collaborate with the enemy, it's the enemy's fault, but when non-Jews
do it, the fault is their own.

I suppose it is for this reason that we have
had to wait in vain for "Szymon the Just" to persecute/prosecute the
alleged "Jewish collaborators" who assisted in the assembly and
deportation of Jews. But as always, Wizenthal will be at no loss for
an excuse:

These collaborators, he will claim, were
simply murdered. But I shall not accept that. I have personally
visited Alois Brunner alias Georg Fischer, the former
SS-Hauptsturmführer, in Damascus and can quote the
following (unincriminated) sections from my banned book Freispruch
für Hitler?:

"After the war, Dr. Lowenherz
expressed his gratitude to Brunner.for his courageous intervention on
behalf of the plan for a Jewish state by in turn intervening publicly
on behalf of Brunner's interests. For good reason I do not want to go
into detail here, but there are court files in Austria that prove
this." (p. 20.)

Dr. Josef Lowenherz, whom Wizenthal accuses
of "collaboration" in the unpleasant sense of the word, was the
leader of the Jewish community in Vienna who persuaded Brunner to
vouch for him to Hitler in order to obtain permission for him to
leave the country so that he could participate in

157

negotiations with representatives of world
Jewry. After the outbreak of World War Two Lowenherz tried to
persuade the Western Allies to effect the continued emigration of
Central European Jews by sea, on American ships. Lowenherz, who had
been impressed by Brunner's courageous correctness throughout those
terrible years, expressed his gratitude to Brunner in a trial against
a relative of this man defamed as mass murderer, by giving
exonerating testimony that led to the relative's acquittal.

This brave and noble-minded act by the
leader of Vienna's Jewish community did not at all fit the concept of
those Jews who had the say after 1945.

At that time Wizenthal and his political
mafia did not dare accuse Dr. Lowenherz, who was within their reach
and of whose cooperation with Brunner they knew, of the same
collaboration (in the nasty sense of the word) of which they now
accuse him and others who were convinced of the Third Reich's wish to
create a Jewish state.

To put an end to Wizenthal's lies about
Alois Brunner aka Georg Fischer once and for all, I wish to state
that in August 1987 Brunner clarified the following in this context:

During the war, he, Alois Brunner, had
not heard so much as a word about the gassing of Jews. It was not
until after 1945 that he heard of such "mass killings" in the Third
Reich, from press reports. Though he first doubted these reports, he
eventually came to the conclusion (since these charges remained
undisputed by the "German side") that such mass killings must have
taken place after all in the specified extermination camps, which he
himself had never entered.

His area of responsibility was the
evacuation and resettlement of the Central European Jews. At first he
was primarily responsible for Austria. He as well as the National
Socialist regime regarded Zionism as that power within German Jewry
with which it seemed most important to work together.

It almost seems as though another
psychological motive and concrete political aim of the Wizenthalian
Hunt is to eradicate all memory of the collaboration between National
Socialist Germany and the founding fathers of the state of Israel.
Kreisky suggests that this may encompass Wizenthal's own
collaboration as well.

For what would have become of the state of
Israel otherwise? Or, to put it another way, without the phenomenon
of National Socialism and its Nuremberg Race Laws, how could one have
persuaded the liberal and middle-class German Jews, as well as the
Polish Jews, to give up what had been their homelands for centuries,
and to immigrate instead into an as yet unborn state under the
adventuresome conditions imposed by a colonization

158

move? That selfsame Israel, the state whose
reason for being was and is the ethnic preservation of the
Jewish people in a closed settlement area, would not have been born,
had it not been for National Socialist Germany and its almost
comparable desire to preserve its own ethnic exclusiveness.

This causal relationship between the
National Socialism of those days and Zionism in the Israel
of today is also where we can find the psychological reasons
for the Jewish state's shrill and never-ending attacks on Hitler and
National Socialism as well as on the Germany of today.

What insanity! What an
aberration!

One more thing regarding Alois Brunner in
this context: for as long as the Western powers had not forbidden the
emigration of Jews to Palestine, all young male Jews from the region
of Austria, before going to Palestine, had to take a three-month
agricultural education course near Waldhofen on the Ybbs river,
provided and paid for by National Socialist Germany. Many a Jewish
kibbutz of our time has Alois Brunner and the National Socialist
institution to thank for its founders' knowledge and expertise.

Brunner, as Lowenherz attests, carried out
his task - which for many German-Austrian Jews meant the painful loss
of their homeland and, for the wealthy, also a considerable
percentage of their fortune - without hate and without tolerating
violent excesses, out of the conviction that he was doing the right
thing. The small minority of radical Zionists within the body of
Austrian Jewry saw matters exactly the same way. And the Jews in
Palestine were well satisfied by the process.

But back to Wizenthal: in the event that he
may yet get hold of Alois Brunner someday, he has already made sure
of the requisite eyewitness testimony regarding individual murder:

"He travelled in person on one of
these transports (to Riga) and en route shot the Jewish ex-banker
Siegmund Bosel." (JNV p. 238.)

I have not asked Alois Brunner whether he
was ever in Riga, or whether he ever committed a gunslinger-style
murder in a station of the German Railway for all the world to
watch, because, being aware of National Socialist
jurisprudence, I don't need to ask such asinine questions. German and
Austrian criminal laws only force us to keep to ourselves any doubts
we may have about the "industrial-style mass murders in gas
chambers"; doubts about scenes from the Wild West, enacted in German
train stations, are still permitted.

In a state where even the smallest
infraction of the law was so dangerous that even professional thieves
avoided plying their trade during black-outs, anyone who is aware of
the realities of National Socialist everyday life will not
hesitate even today to describe public gunslinging and butchery in
train

159

stations and on sidewalks as figments of the
sick imagination of Szymon Wizenthal and his criminal troop of false
witnesses. Such sordid scenarios taken straight from second-rate
Westerns never took place in the realm of law and order that was the
Third Reich, where a soldier was court-martial led for stealing a
pair of earmuffs.

Wizenthal imparts another interesting piece
of information in his book:

"The wartime role of the International
Committee of tile Red Cross in Geneva was likewise anything but
glorious The Committee considered concentration camps on German or
German-occupied territory to be an internal German matter and did not
intervene even once with the German Reich government in the interests
of the Jews, or later against the extermination of the Jews (for
which, incidentally, lorries painted with a Red Cross were used in
Auschwitz)." (JNV p. 250.)

I have studied the question of the existence
of gas chambers in the Third Reich for decades, but this is the first
time I have ever heard that gassings in concentration camps were
supposed to have been carried out in "lorries". With this downright
lunatic claim, Wizenthal upsets everything that is sacred to the
official dogma regarding the model extermination camp Auschwitz:

In my May 1992 trial, Professor
Gerhard Jagschitz, the court-appointed subject expert who had spent
five years researching the concentration camp Auschwitz- Birkenau,
testified to everything he had been able to unearth in support of the
gas chamber theory (in eyewitness statements only - he had been
unable to find any key documents). His report (Hv 5720/90)
contains nary a word about lorries, much less lorries painted
with a Red Cross. The subject literature also fails in this regard.

Since Wizenthal tells us of Red Cross
lorries, what are we now to think of the commonly alleged gas
chambers? Here the legal system leaves us at a loss, alone with our
confusion and the "Holo".

In exile in Syria, Alois Brunner was the
target of two attempts on his life, via letter bombs, which he almost
miraculously survived, albeit badly maimed. Now let us see how
mocking and cynical an account Wizenthal gives in his book of this
attempted murder:

"Reporters from a German magazine
found him without difficulty andpublished a lengthy
series of photographs and interviews. Nor did thepostman have any problem fnding hint. In July 1980 Brunner,
alias Fischer, had a package delivered to him which had been posted
in Austria and allegedly contained medicinal herbs. In a covering
letter the `Association of Friends of Medicinal Herbs' in Karlstein
apologized that they could not send the ring-bound books ordered by
Brunner from `God's Pharmacy for Your Health' but instead had found
some other books with a

160

similar content. When Brunner opened
the package it exploded of the fingers of his left hand, only his
thumb remained. Despite this successful postal delivery Syria
continued to maintain that Brunner could not be located."
(p. 251.)

To summarize: the man who had had to work
together with the founding fathers of Israel regarding the
immigration of Jews into Palestine is targeted by a cowardly and
treacherous assassination attempt. Wizenthal, who throughout his book
about the sufferings of his people exhibits a total lack of
appropriate gravity with regard to any kind of sacrifice, and who
shows a sense of humor which but for its gruesome nature could be
taken straight from a low-class cabaret, calls this crime a
"successful postal delivery". In other words, he does not even
pretend to dissociate himself from the crime; he only indicates that
he considers it funny.

Regarding the consequences of the two
assassination attempts which were variously reported in the press -
namely, the loss of eight fingers in total, blindness on one eye and
98% vision loss on the other - Wizenthal seems to be inadequately
informed.

On the other hand, he is very well informed
indeed about details that he should not be able to know at all, since
as far as I know they were not published in any newspaper and were
thus not known to anyone outside the Syrian police, who secured the
evidence of the letter bomb. Aside from the police, the only ones who
should know these details are the perpetrators!

Specifically, I am referring to the
accompanying letter: this letter was badly damaged in the explosion,
and the Syrian criminologists could barely reconstruct it, yet
Wizenthal quotes its text in full!

It is already incredible enough that the
Austrian authorities, on learning of this attempted murder, did not
immediately summon Wizenthal for questioning. One must consider that
the victim of the assassination attempt was a putative "Nazi war
criminal". In the entire world only one man has created a title for
himself as hunter of this particular species - namely, "Nazi hunter",
a term whose use that man values highly. And like it or lump it, that
man's name is Wizenthal, and he happens to live in the country where
the "industrial" machinery of murder was primed for Brunner. And
Wizenthal is even dumb enough to rejoice in his book about the
partial success of the crime!

If any given Austrian city harbored a known
sexual predator, this previous offender would be interrogated by the
police after any similar offense had been committed in the area!

In the Wizenthal case, such interrogation
has been omitted with downright criminal negligence after all cases
of murder of former Nazis, even

161

though the obvious suspect has openly
acknowledged his penchant for violent acts and infractions of the law
by his admitted participation in abduction and kidnapping. Numerous
other acts of violence and unsolved murders, committed against a
similar group and described triumphantly by the accused, could also
have been solved long ago if the only suspect, namely Szymon
Wizenthal himself, had been interrogated accordingly.

Since the Nazi hunter, as I have shown,
personally admits knowing by rote the contents of the letter that
accompanied the diabolical device and was virtually destroyed in the
explosion, the suspicion of murder hardens into likelihood bordering
on certainty.

Therefore I am bringing criminal charges
at the public prosecutor's office in Vienna, against the Austrian
citizen residing in Vienna as Simon Wiesenthal, real name Szymon
Wizenthal (divergent information exists regarding place of birth),
under §§ 75, 277 and 87 of the German Criminal Code, and
request the subject be detained pending his trial due to the risk of
escape, collusion and repeated offence on his part.

Gogl was acquitted! Gogl lives. Generous.
Distinguished. Loved and respected by his family and friends. In his
own interest, his opinion on "gas chambers" shall not be examined.

Johann Vinzenz Gogl, accused by a Wizenthal
Colleague called Kehraus of having committed four murders in the
concentration camp Mauthausen, unites in his person all the
prerequisites we have already repeatedly described and which those
chosen by Wizenthal as war criminals and sadists characteristically
exhibit: a very decent person both "before" and "after", loved by his
family, respected by his fellow citizens.

Since Gogl disputed all the murders he was
accused of, Wizenthal saw himself forced to come up with eyewitness
testimony. He describes this as follows:

"Meanwhile, however, I had written to
Fad Vashem and asked for my material on Gogl. This actually includes
a letter from a former inmate, Simon Lifschitz from the Bavarian
township of Marktredwitz, where a refugee camp had existed."
(JNV p. 306.)

In this letter the witness had offered to
testify to at least 100 murders, but unfortunately the witness could
no longer be located. Problem? Not for Wizenthal. As always, he took
the initiative:

"On the other hand I discovered the
testimony of a Yugoslav journalist, Hrvoje MacanoviA, who had given
evidence against Gogl in Zagreb, andwithin a short time an appeal by the
organization of Mauthausen exprisoners was overwhelmingly
successful." (JNV p. 306.)

With that, Wizenthal admits that the witness
statements were made only after the victim had been selected - in
other words, tailor-made to fit the alleged criminal.

The painful experiences that deprived
Wizenthal of his favorite pleasure, namely attending the judicial
murders he had staged before the courts, are described by him as
follows:

"I myself had made it a practice,
wherever possible, not to attend a trial, because witnesses would
invariably come up to talk to me and this would then be interpreted
by defence counsel as attempts on my part to influence their
evidence." (JNY p. 307.)

In a sense, it is the most natural thing in
the world for an employee to at least say "hello" to his boss at the
workplace. But it is also understandable that the witnesses were
sometimes visited by Wizenthal in the hotels where they were jointly
accommodated, and that sometimes - when they began to

164

feel a bit uncomfortable in their role,
perhaps, or began to get cold feet - they would feel the need to
revive their spirits at the flames of his Old Testament vengeance.

After the unanimous acquittal on all 23
counts in the Gogl case, Wizenthal was visibly crushed:

"When the press asked for my reaction
I found it difficult to control myself the Gogl case had been well
prepared There were unquestionable and convincing testimonies by
witnesses" (JNV p. 307.)

So that's what Wizenthal understands by
"well prepared": the provision of "convincing
testimonies".

Well, after all that is his
business.

In this context it must be mentioned that
one witness testimonial in particular was "out of the ordinary",
as Wizenthal put it:

"...it was by a witness called Magnus
Keller who had been appointed campelder by the SS .... During
his interrogation by the Allied military tribunalin Dachau in
1946 Keller had still stood squarely by the prisoners and had called
Gogl one of the most dangerous murderers in the Mauthausen and
Ebensee concentration camps .... But in the Linz trial Keller's
testimony had suddenly changed: he could not recall his evidence to
the American military tribunal; all he knew about Gogl was that he
had been a protectorof the prisoners." (JNV p.
308.)

What is interesting about this is the
phrase, "Keller had still stood squarely by the prisoners "
Wizenthal evidently feels that witnesses should take someone's
side (namely, his). That it might be sufficient to tell the truth,
and that this truth might also be to the benefit of the accused, is
something that Wizenthal and his mission categorically rule out.

His sense of right and wrong is badly
underdeveloped.

Whether Gogl "denied" the "gas chamber" of
Mauthausen is anyone's guess. But if he had "admitted" its existence,
Wizenthal would surely have considered that worth mentioning.

That Johann Gogl, like the other Wizenthal
Victims as well, had been a socially well integrated man all his life
and transformed into a bloodthirsty monster only for the short time
in which he was placed in a position of authority over Wizenthal's
society of false witnesses is something we shall let the manhunter
describe in his own words:

"Johann Pinzenz Gogl is to this day
one of the socially most valuable members of the municipality of
Ottnang-on-Hausruck: he has two children(won't they
be happy to find themselves immortalized in Wizenthal's
collective-guilt literature as the children of a father acquitted by
law but still portrayed as mass murderer by our restitution
swindler!), is a

165

superb watchmaker, and is entirely
devoted to his pets. Usitors to his home were able to admire fourteen
budgerigars, several cats and a dog from the dogs' home."
(JNV p. 309.)

We can see that the suspicions harbored by
the academically accredited engineer from Galicia continue to be well
founded. A love of animals has alarmed our fraud in other cases as
well. It's a sure sign of guilt.

As always: an old man, honest and
respected. But Wizenthal wants us to believe that once (during the
war), for a short time, he turned into a raging beast.

And again: a German witness for the
defense dies mysteriously in the court room.

And yet again: Leo Berger, Jewish witness
for the defense, corrects falsified testimony and says: "Josef
Schwammberger was good to us " On leaving the court room, he is
threatened by persons unknown.

The verdict: life
imprisonment.

"Without a shred of evidence," Josef
Schwammberger, who "was good to the inmates", was sentenced to life
in prison. Since I am not personally familiar enough with this case,
I shall quote from the publication Der EidgenoJ3 of August 6,
1992, published by Dr. Max Wahl:

"On June 26, 1991 the 9th Division of
the Stuttgart Provincial High Court and Court of Appeal sentenced
senior SS-Oberscharführer Josef Schwammberger (born in 1912 in
Brixen, South Tyrol) to spend the rest of his life in a Federal
German prison. The trial itself is evidence for yet another
installment of the lowest possible dregs of the new German justice
system slavishly in the service of perpetual slander of the German
people and the best of its sons. The token representative of this
justice system, Herbert Luippold, is the same judge as that who also
sat in judgement in 1982 over the Federal German financial lawyer Dr.
Wilhelm Staglich and banned his academic study 'Der Auschwitz Mythos'
['The Auschwitz Myth
]."

After a long period of abstinence, Wizenthal
took this trial as an opportunity to once again indulge in a bit of
courtroom and execution tribunal atmosphere. Anyone who doubts the
continuous cooperation between Wizenthal and the Masonic lodge B'nai
B'rith learns from Dr. Max Wahl that when the trial of Josef
Schwammberger was convened on June 26, 1991, the person sitting
beside Szymon Wizenthal in the courtroom was none less than Eliot
Welles from New York. Welles is the "Director" of the ADL, the
Anti-Defamation League. The ADL, in turn, is the militant arm of the
infamous and seemingly omnipotent Masonic lodge, with whose help
Wizenthal can effortlessly initiate his demonstrations at the push of
a button in any country in the world and in front of any Embassy he
desires.

And the ADL's favorite game is defamation,
preferably the defamation of Germany.

168

Mysterious death of
witness.

A former Oberscharführer of the
SS who had been subpoenaed by the public prosecutor's office and
whose testimony might have harmed the goal of the trial, died
in the court room. Max Wahl reports:

"Eric!: Scharf, former
Oberscharführer in the SS and Police District Cracow, summoned
by the public prosecutor's office, could no doubt have given precise
information about the organizational structure and the Auschwitz
office where Josef Schwammberger was employed But after uttering only
a few sentences, the healthy witness inexplicably collapsed,
dead."

Jewish witness for the defense is
threatened. The court does not believe him.

Der Eidgenoß reports about the
appearance of Leo Berger, Jewish witness for the defense:

"Berger described the normal every-day
life in the camp and said of Josef Schwammberger: 'He was good to us,
he never gave us a hard time. He was there, and that was his duty.'
About the deaths in the Oranienburg camp, where Berger was in 1945:
'Hundreds died How did they die? It was like this: no food, thirst,
they ate snow, diarrhea, air-raids.' In Stuttgart this courageous
witness showed himself to be the exact opposite of Wizenthal, and
posed the question to the court: 'Vengeance, hate, or
justice?'

"For that, he was physically
threatened in the court hallway by a group of professional
haters."

As yet no-one has bothered to examine, count
and compare the testimonies of Jewish witnesses for the defense who
painted a different picture of not only the accused but also of
the mass dyings in the camps of the Third Reich - a picture
different from that which constitutes the "Holocaust". As well,
no-one has bothered to trace the subsequent fates of these witnesses
for the defense or to interview them regarding the reprisals they
were and continue to be exposed to in Israel, in Germany, in America,
or elsewhere in the world.

Those who would have liked to make the
effort have been denied access to the files. At this point one must
also ask why there are only 8,000 Jewish testimonies worldwide (cf.
Prof. Jagschitz, Hv 5720/90) that confirm the

169

"Holocaust", and largely from hearsay? If
one considers that two million "survivors" immigrated to Israel
alone, of which 200,000 are still alive in that country today (see
document p. ), then there seems to have been little effort made to
collect the first-hand accounts of all these others. The Federal
Republic of Germany - who can certainly not be accused of excessive
concern or even interest in the fate of the German people as a whole,
or the six million German post-war victims in particular - keeps a
study about the expulsion of the Sudeten Germans under lock and key,
thus keeping the public ignorant of 150,000 authentic German
testimonies of German eyewitnesses. It is high time - and I am saying
this with an awareness of the as yet unheard and unheeded Jewish
witnesses for the defense - that the silent Jewish majority also be
given a hearing at long last.

May the testimony of the honest and
courageous Jew Leo Berger of Florida, which was unlawfully suppressed
in the Schwammberger trial, encourage those Jewish people whose lips
have so far been sealed by the fear of Wizenthal and the Imperium he
stands for, to finally speak out!

None of the twelve men whom Wizenthal
hunted and whose cases he describes in his book Justice
Not Vengeance as "typical" ever "confessed" to the existence
of the "gas chambers". The majority of these persecuted bearers of
secrets disputed their existence openly.

Thus, Wizenthal lied when he repeatedly
claimed (for example in the Vienna Kurier of December
10, 1989) that "none of the accused in post1945 Nazi trials disputed
the existence of gas chambers." (He should have said, correctly, that
none of the SS-men who were acquitted had disputed the "gas
chambers".) With horror we find that all twelve hunted "deniers of
the gas chambers" died under mysterious circumstances.

Interestingly, Uwe Barschel (the chief
minister of Schleswig Holstein), Heribert Apfalter (the president of
the nationalized Austrian steel industry), and Herbert Amry (the
Austrian ambassador in Athens) also died the same mysterious way as
did the "gas chamber deniers", as described here. Does the Mossad
have a "Tesla Ray" weapon?

Hebrew law places great value on eyewitness
testimony and has been known to punish false witnesses as severely as
it would have punished the accused, if found guilty (SemitTimes
No. 3/1992, p. 3).

From this perspective, Wizenthal would have
to be put on trial for million-fold murder for his statistical fraud
alone, which amounts to some two to four million fictitious victims
for Mauthausen. But our subject here is not Hebrew law - though it
might be quite delightful to sentence the guilty in accordance with
their own laws some day.

But here we are dealing with the suspicion
of murder in the common and general sense.

As I have already shown (cf. the chapter on
the Brunner case, p. ), Szymon Wizenthal, writing in his book
Justice Not Vengeance, has revealed a detailed knowledge of
the second attempt on Alois Brunner's life that, aside from the
Syrian police, only the would-be murderers could have.

Therefore, I shall recapitulate: in Syria
there lives a man who calls himself Georg Fischer and who Szymon
Wizenthal claims is Alois Brunner. Two attempts on
Fischer's/Brunner's life are made via letter bombs. In the second
instance, the parcel, bearing the return address "Krauterpfarrer
Weidinger" and allegedly containing a medical book, was posted in
Austria - the domicile of the world's only known Nazi hunter.

172

Since we can hardly assume that "herbal
priest" Weidinger himself should have sent a bomb instead of a book
to a customer named Georg Fischer, and since the freedom of movement
enjoyed by Jewish agents on Syrian soil is not likely to be adequate
to this task, we may conclude that the hellish device was substituted
for the book with the aid of accomplices within the Austrian postal
system.

The only man in Austria who time and again
has "young Israelis" assigned to him as assistants and who, for the
rest, recruits his co-workers by racial and religious standards from
among the Austrian religious community, is Szymon Wizenthal, whose
collaboration with the ruling party and the Austrian police
authorities predestines him like none other to conceive of such a
plan and have it carried out.

But even if one laid such an assassination
attempt at the door of the Israeli secret service, the Mossad, this
does not rule out Wizenthal's involvement, at least in the planning
stage: after all, as he himself admits, he already once before
collaborated with the Mossad in another serious crime (with fatal
consequences), in violation of national and international law -
namely, in the kidnapping of Adolf Eichmann in Argentina. As we know,
Adolf Eichmann was "convicted" in Israel in a trial conducted in
gross violation of legal norms, and murdered. Only someone who
considers as "legal" a trial where abduction is the foundation, where
the verdict passed by hate-driven enemies is the guideline, and where
the accused is displayed in a soundproof plexiglass cage, cut off
from the outside world, can gloss over the outcome and call it an
"execution".

But back to the Brunner case.

Szymon Wizenthal, the common criminal guilty
of being the accessory to abduction, is thus adequately established
as an advocate of the "law of the jungle", which he places over
international legal constructs, and has collaborated with the Jewish
secret service for decades. Why he was not immediately taken in for
questioning, if not arrested outright, after the attack on
Brunner/Fischer became known, is something that cannot be explained
by legal norms.

Added to this is the fact that even today,
Wizenthal describes the victim, who only escaped the attack badly
maimed, as still the most important man on his "hit list".

But since I have established that
Wizenthal - as he himself admits (cf. JNV p. 251) - knows the text of
the accompanying letter, which was almost destroyed in the explosion
and whose contents only the Syrian police and the perpetrator himself
can know, the public prosecutor's

173

office in Vienna and the Austrian police
are hereby urged to move promptly, in the spirit of the legal order
in force.

The strange deaths of the hunted
victims.

In every case where Wizenthal failed to get
hold of the person he hunted, death was in store for his victim, as
we shall show. In most cases it was death by seemingly completely
natural causes, but in some cases even Wizenthal must admit (and I
think I hear an undertone of triumph) that the circumstances of death
were "not entirely cleared up".

1. Death in the Rauff
case.

"Two days before the courier's
departure, on 14 May, the news arrived that Rauff had died of heart
failure." (JNY p. 64. )

With that, the Chilean officials no longer
had to worry about complying with the request for extradition.
Federal Chancellor Kohl as well, who had dutifully intervened as
ordered by Wizenthal, was rid of the worry about further
interventions. And Szymon Wizenthal had the good fortune of not
having to give the accused, who energetically disputed the existence
of both the "gas chambers" and the "gas vans", the opportunity to
leak such heretical claims from a best-informed source to the
unsuspecting German public before finally being eliminated
juridically.

2. Death in the Heyde
case.

In 1962 Dr. Werner Heyde, Professor of
Psychiatry at the University of Wurzburg, was arrested in the context
of allegedly killing "unfit life" with "bottled carbon monoxide" (a
method which experts today dismiss as utterly absurd). Dr. Heyde must
evidently have disputed the "carbon monoxide gassings at Hartheim",
since his confession, important as it would be, is also absent from
the relevant literature about the "Holocaust". Here too, a fortunate
twist of fate prevented an insider who disputed the gassings from
gaining a courtroom platform for his account of historical events:

"Heyde, responsible for the death of
at least 100,000 people, was arrested in 1962... and committed
suicide." (JNU p. 82. )

174

3. Death in the Stangl
case.

Fate was less kind to Wizenthal in the case
of Franz Stangl, the commandant of Treblinka. He was able to dispute
before the German court that he had had anything to do with "mass
killings". But nonetheless he was denied the opportunity to give
detailed historical information, for example in an appeal:

"He died in prison on 28 June
1971." (JNV p. 87. )

At this point it should be noted that
Stangl's deputy as commandant of Treblinka, Kurt Franz, who is still
serving a life sentence today, was not called as witness regarding
Treblinka in the Demjanjuk trial because Israeli authorities had to
fear not only that his testimony would exonerate Demjanjuk, but also
that he would categorically dispute the existence of any gas chamber
in Treblinka at all.

4. Death in the Roschmann
case.

When the extradition of Eduard Roschmann
from Argentina would not proceed as desired, fortunate coincidence
once again smiled on Wizenthal:

"But he was overtaken by another heart
attack: he had to be readmitted to hospital and there he died of
cardiac failure during the night of 10 August." (JNV p.
102. )

That Roschmann was also a stubborn "denier
of the gas chambers" is not difficult to guess. A well-intentioned
murder attempt whose perpetrators were never found and which had also
been aimed at Roschmann took place at the same time:

"Unknown men threw a bomb at his
house." (JNV p. 102; see also the Braunsteiner case.)

5. Death in the Mengele
case.

The fact that Dr. Josef Mengele, had he been
arraigned in court, would also have disputed the idea that Jews were
murdered en masse for reasons of their race follows from a
conversation which Dr. Hans Munch, the Auschwitz camp doctor who had
formerly been acquitted of all charges, had with members of Mengele's
family (JNV p. 114-115), with the aim of working out a defense
strategy to obtain an acquittal for Mengele.

175

Just as the pressure exerted by the American
senators on Paraguay and its President Stössner to surrender
Mengele to Germany proved futile, Wizenthal efforts were blessed by -
you guessed it, dear reader - a fortunate coincidence:

"On 7 February 1979 Mengele was
reported to have drowned on a bathing trip not far from
São Paulo." (JNV p. 111. )

6. Death in the Gerhard
case.

But the death that is in store for those who
incur Wizenthal's wrath also struck the man who had once given
Mengele his identity card to help him escape:

"Wolfgang Gerhard died in Graz shortly
afterwards, in circumstances which have not been entirely cleared
up." (JNV p. 113.)

If Wizenthal thinks that the circumstances
surrounding Wolfgang Gerhard's death are the only ones that want
clearing up, he is sorely mistaken.

Immediately after the liberation of the
concentration camps, the majority of the SS guards were murdered -
often after first being tortured horribly. With regard to Dachau I
have documentary photos, taken by an eyewitness yet living, that
prove this.

In the other concentration camps - and here
we have many more such gruesome pieces of evidence - similar orgies
of murder took place. Even Wizenthal points us in that direction -
unintentionally, no doubt:

"Eighty out of the 1300 members of the
SS who had belonged to the camp staff were convicted."
(JNV p. 143 ).

The unanswered question is: what happened to
the others?

Wizenthal admits that in the context of his
man-hunts he can order demonstrations ready-made in any part of the
world, with a simple phone call. Of course he takes care not to
identify himself with the murders or attempted murders of his
victims. However, he does have some tender nicknames for the Jewish
assassins:

"A few hotheads manufactured a bomb,
but set it off in front of the wrong house, so that the home of some
totally uninvolved person was wrecked." (JNV p. 153.)

Anyone who trivializes murderers or
assassins working with bombs as "hotheads" also shows that he is
utterly uncritical or even approving of their crimes.

176

7. Death in the Kutschmann
case.

The extradition of Walter Kutschmann from
Argentina was also problematic. At that point in his persecution, the
man who disputed the existence of "gas chambers" did Wizenthal the
expected favor: "On 30 August 1985 he died of cardiac arrest. "
(JNV p. 173. )

Kutschmann did it in the hospital. Might
this be another case where a "Jew within the surgeon came out on
top"? (cf. JNV p. 138.)

8. Death in the Hrabatyn
case.

The Ukrainian Ivan Dimitrevich Hrabatyn was
supposed to be extradited from Canada to Germany. The "witnesses"
stood ready. But - for whatever reason - fate would have it that
no-one would need to wait for the uncertain outcome of the
extradition proceedings:

"Except that Hrabatyn has been dead
since 1980." (JNV p. 207.)

9. Death in the Globocnik
case.

Odilo Globocnik, the Carinthian whose
closest colleagues were the two "deniers of the gas chambers" Hermann
Hofle of Salzburg and Ernst Lerch of Klagenfurt, could not take the
stand in court as an informed source and denier of the gas chambers:

"Globocnik himself committed suicide
in jai! in Villach in 1945..." (JNV p. 274.)

10. Death in the Höfle
case.

Globocnik's colleague Hermann Höfle was
a particular thorn in Wizenthal's side. He had dared tell an
examining magistrate that he had not even "heard rumors" of "gas
chambers" in the Third Reich! He (Höfle) had not heard of
"gassings" or "executions" until after the war, and then only through
newspapers.

A trial against Hofle would have had the
exceedingly unpleasant side effect of allowing someone "in the know"
to dispute the existence of "gas chambers" in the Third Reich from
the high-profile platform of a jury court. But fortunate coincidence
smiled on Wizenthal:

177

"On 20 August 1962, ten weeks after
his transfer, he hanged himself in his solitary cell. "
(JNV p. 278.)

11. Death in the Wagner
case.

In the case of Gustav Wagner as well, the
hunted man's death took place at what, for his hunters, was the best
possible time.

After years of media campaigns and
diplomatic initiatives by the Federal Republic of Germany, Brazil had
definitely refused to extradite Wagner.

Even during his detention, Wagner had
suffered several heart attacks(!), but survived them by virtue of his
extraordinary constitution.

A man with such an uncooperative heart,
which resisted the usual cause of death so persistently, might need
to be helped along with more "conventional" means:

"At the beginning of October he hanged
himself at a remote farm." (JNV p. 95.)

Summary:

What is so noteworthy about the deaths of
Wizenthal's victims is that this fate only struck those which
Wizenthal failed to hunt down or which disputed the existence of "gas
chambers" in the Third Reich.

In both cases, the death rate - roughly
estimated on the basis of the book analyzed here - is about
90%.

Beyond that, a great many persons who were
in a position to know about "gas chambers" in the Third Reich, and
disputed their existence, also died most suddenly. One example is
Richard Baer, commandant of Auschwitz and successor to Rudolf
Höss; in 1965, middle-aged and evidently in good health, he died
in prison in Frankfurt.

How very dangerous it really was to dispute
the "mass murder of Jews" in the Third Reich for the sake of their
race follows from a letter by Hans-Ulrich Rudel:

"As early as 1952 I already learned
from Dr. Stuckart, the Secretary of State at the Ministry of the
Interior, that the point of the Wannsee Conference had not been the
physical destruction o/' Jews - neither explicitly nor ineplicitly.
That, he said, was a whopping lie. Unfortunately he died in a car
accident one year later (just like Otto Abetz and Ferdinand
Marian)." (Freispruch für Hitler? p.
155.)

178

"Heart attacks", therefore, have largely
replaced car accidents as the Mossad's method of choice - no doubt
due to improvements in technique.

From the cases listed and solidly documented
here, it is clear that disputing the "mass murder of Jews" for the
sake of their race leads to a rapid reduction of life expectancy for
those doing the disputing. Even if one concedes that such disputing
of the "gas chambers" is considered a crime by the laws in force in
Germany and Austria, it still does not justify treacherous murder.

It doesn't always need to be a heart
attack:
The assault on Professor Robert Faurisson.

Concentration camp commandants who gave a
different account of events in the camps under their charge than the
victorious powers would have liked to hear were not the only ones at
risk of their lives. The French university professor Dr. Robert
Faurisson, for example, was attacked in 1988 by persons unknown, with
the evident intent to kill him. The scholar's face was smashed
horribly, and he only survived thanks to the aid of some good
samaritans who happened to come along - but not before his jaw was
broken in six places. As recently as February 1992, Wizenthal, who
considers Faurisson's statements to be particularly dangerous,
traveled to Spain in order to prevent the scholar from speaking to
Spanish students. He shamelessly lied to the Spanish press by
claiming that Faurisson had been repeatedly convicted by French
courts for spreading lies.

This is the common factor in the attacks on
Alois Brunner and Professor Faurisson: both were considered by
Wizenthal to be potential opponents due to what they knew - though
they had acquired their knowledge in fundamentally different ways.

An account by Ernst Zundel proves that
Wizenthal-sympathizers are also capable of using far cruder methods.
In one of his newsletters Zündel wrote:

"A Ukrainian by the name of Walter
Osidach, who was suspected just as shrilly of having been a monster
in human form, suffered.. a heart attack(!).

"Members of a Jewish terrorist gang
snuck into the hospital, rushed into the room where the critically
ill patient lay, wildly shook his bed and tried to tear out the tubes
he was hooked up to for oxygen, blood transfusions etc.

179

"Patients and nurses were just barely
able to prevent 0sidach's certain death. No-one called the police.
Everyone was afraid 0sidach was later found innocent, and died
shortly thereafter. "

Any experienced criminologist will rule out
the possibility that this mysterious aggregate of accidents and heart
attacks that seek out the bearers of secrets from the Third Reich
like an epidemic could be coincidental. Any criminal investigation
begins with the question "qui bono?" - "who benefits?" Or, to put it
another way: who had a motive?

It's simply not acceptable that
Wizenthal, the only man in the world to bear the title "Nazi hunter",
should be excluded from criminological investigation into the
mysterious deaths of his victims.

In all the cases discussed, the suspicion of
murder involving Wizenthal is deepened by the fact that Wizenthal
himself has admitted to having "worked well together" with
Tuvia Friedmann for years after the war (Profil, July 25, 1988, p.
16). Precisely those years, however, are the time frame for an
activity of Friedmann's which the German journalist and author Hans
Peter Rullmann describes in his book Der Fall Demjanjuk as
follows:

"After the Second World War
he(referring to Friedmann) led a commando which
liquidated German suspects without a triab." (pp. 131 and
145.)

But if it was Friedmann's vocation during
that time to liquidate suspects, and if he worked together with
Wizenthal precisely during that same time, then we may conclude that
Wizenthal was involved in these murders, as well as in the crimes
described in the previous.

In the "ten cases" which Wizenthal calls
"typical" and in which the hunted all fail to confess to the "gas
chambers", all the victims expire at the point in time most
convenient and favorable to the Nazi hunter. No criminologist can
possibly regard this as a coincidence.

But what shall one think when one considers
that more than half of these deaths (Rauff, Stangl, Roschmann,
Kutschmann, Wagner and Mengele) are heart attacks?

One also notices that the last commandant of
Auschwitz, Richard Baer - a "denier of the gas chambers" as well -
also suffered a mysterious death in 1965 in Frankfurt, during his
detention awaiting trial. He was just over 50, and healthy as
a horse. The cause of his death? Heart attack!

"Tesla Rays"?

The son of the Carinthian Gauleiter
Rainer, engineer Friedl Rainer, who had gathered and shared with
me an extensive collection of evidence

180

incriminating Wizenthal - (and incidentally,
engineer Rainer died in hospital at age 54, under strange attendant
circumstances, as his sister informed me; cause of death: heart
attack!) - had carried on a friendly correspondence with a German Jew
named Kaufmann.

On the suggestion of engineer Fried]
Rainer, this Kaufmann, who periodically sent newsletters to a small
circle of his friends, also included me on his mailing list. In these
newsletters Kaufmann claimed that he had once spent two years in
Israel contributing to the development of a secret weapon based on
the so-called "Tesla rays" which, he said, could be aimed at a person
at home from a considerable distance away. At a lower intensity these
rays would cause insomnia and ill health and, at a higher dosage,
cardiac arrest.

Kaufmann also gave advice as to how one
could protect oneself against these rays (for example with metal
sheeting, etc.).

However, since I knew that people suffering
from paranoia are often afraid of "rays" and the like, I paid no
attention to these newsletters, despite their rather fascinating
style of composition.

Water in the bath tub?

In his last newsletter Kaufmann shared with
his readers a method with which one could improvise protection
against this ray weapon if one should happen to know that one was
being targeted:

Jump into the bath tub (in one's clothes,
so as not to lose time), fill the tub with water, and wait there
until the danger is past.

The letter also stated that the German
politicians were aware of this weapon and its use on German soil by
the Israeli secret service Mossad. For the aforementioned reasons I
paid no attention to this letter either.

I thought it odd, however, that only a few
days later the West German politician Uwe Barschel - just over 40, on
the upwards track of a brilliant career, athletic and successful -
was found dead in a Geneva hotel room.

His body was found, fully clothed, in the
bath tub, and the water was still running!

Another point of note: in his last
newsletter, mentioned above, Kaufmann had also reported that he would
have to have an operation in the hospital soon, and that he was
afraid that during his stay there he would be murdered by the Israeli
Mossad, with the method he had exposed and denounced.

A few days later Kaufmann was dead. Of a
heart attack!

181

Austrian heart attacks and the Near
East.

Without knowing Herrn Kaufmann, and without
being aware of the "serial heart attacks" among the "deniers of the
gas chambers", the Austrian author and journalist Hans Pretterebner
also noticed a strange series of heart attacks claiming the lives of
people who had become a thorn in the sides of international
Freemasonry or the Israeli-American lobby in Austria.

In his book Der Fall Lucona, with
which he brought Vienna's leading Freemason, Udo Proksch, behind bars
for murder, and two Social Democratic Ministers to trial,
Pretterebner writes in this context:

"The 53 year-old (referring to
Otto Kolbl, witness for the defense) who had never been ill before
and had never needed medical care, was dead on the spot. The
parallels to other recent mysterious deaths are
clear:

"From the sudden heart attack and
death of the Austrian ambassador in Athens, Herbert Amry, after he
had reported the smuggling of weapons from the United Austrian Iron
and Steel Works.. to the Vienna Foreign Office in summer 1985,
to the heart attack suffered by the chief minister of Schleswig
Holstein, Uwe Barschel, who had been involved in some mysterious
goings-on and whose body was found in tile bathtub of a hotel in
Geneva.

"Another prominent personage to
succumb to cardiac arrest was Heribert Apfalter, the former Director
of the United Austrian Iron and Steel Works, who died suddenly in his
country house in autumn 1987, only a few days after testifying before
the District Court of Linz regarding the Iran weapons affair.
A stranger invited him to a meeting at a service
inn along the western Autobahn. Four or five hours later Apfalter was
dead No external causative factors were ever found in any of these
cases." (Der Fall Lucona, p. 356.)

A strange cause of death walks the streets
in Austria and throughout the world. But the police does not
investigate. The media sees no pattern among the deaths. The
politicians are silent.

The fact that two Jewish attorneys named
Lansky and Zanger were in the aforementioned Freemason Udo Proksch's
camp seems unremarkable in the context of the mysterious deaths here
at issue. However, we have already met these two Jewish left-wing
radicals once before in this book (see the chapter "Wizenthal's
Revenge"), namely as participants in that Jewish commando that wormed
its way into the Austrian Parliament on November 20, 1991, under the
leadership of Szymon Wizenthal masquerading as

182

academically accredited engineer, in order
to force a law against "deniers of the gas chambers". This highlights
the interconnections in this confusing game, without which one could
easily lose track.

That the borders between East and West grow
somewhat fuzzy in the process doesn't matter: the strange death that
claims the inconvenient elements in Wizenthal's vicinity is always
the same.

Just as an aside, it is interesting to note
that engineer Wolf-Rüdiger Heß, the son of Hitler's
second-in-command Rudolf Heß, suffered a heart attack just as
he was about to expose his father's death as murder to a group of
foreign journalists.

Another element fits seamlessly into the
pattern of serial deaths: in the trial against Schwammberger, that
witness for the defense about whom it had become known at the last
minute that he would exonerate the accused, collapsed dead at the
start of his testimony in court. He was the former SS
Oberscharführer Erich Scharf. Cause of death: heart
attack.

Therefore, in the cases described by Szymon
Wizenthal as "typical", in which the majority of the hunted victims
died mysteriously, and particularly in the case of the murderous
attacks against Alois Brunner, I bring charges against Wizenthal on
at least twelve counts of murder or acting as accessory to murder.
Szymon Wizenthal (he goes by the name of Simon Wiesenthal) is an
Austrian citizen and resides in Vienna. Due to the grave risk of
escape, collusion and repeated offence on his part, I urge that the
suspect be detained without delay, pending trial.

"We were sending photographs of the
Braunsleiner woman to every victims' association we knew of..."

"We made a last attempt: Frau Erna
Birnbach accused Bender o/' the murder of her cousin..."

"From Israel we received the names of
fourteen lrennese Jews who had survived.. and could give evidence on
H6Jle's activities."

"On the other hand I discovered the
testimony of a Yugoslav journalist..."

Wizenthal escorts witnesses for the
prosecution in to examining magistrate Buchgraber arm in arm.

Never was Szymon Wizenthal's role as head of
the false witness ring more openly apparent than on Friday, October
15, 1992. Once again he had sought a victims, and believed he had
found it in the 74-year-old ethnic Slovenian dentist Dr. Sabukoschek
of Graz. That the accused is one-quarter Jewish, that he fled to
Belgrade as opponent of National Socialism and, apprehended by the
German Wehrmacht, served there as interpreter for the German side was
just a small drop of bitterness for the "Nazi hunter" who could not
contain his enthusiasm for attack.

As always, the false witnesses stood at the
ready, only this time - as a press report from October 16, 1992
(Kronen-Zeitung, Vienna) documents - Wizenthal could pull up
right outside the District Court of Graz with "his" witness Maria
Krauss, whom he escorted personally to her questioning by the judge.

The examining magistrate (see p. ) who made
this possible - despite the fact that witnesses are not generally
allowed to waltz into court in obvious collusion with their handlers
- is an old acquaintance of ours: Dr. Karl Buchgraber, the same
examining magistrate who already made a name for himself as shady
character in another case. In the political show trial against Franz
Radl, a 24-year-old student with an impeccable record, Buchgraber
distinguished himself with two utterly unprofessional and
inappropriate measures: he had denied the extremely nearsighted
student Franz Radl his corrective lenses (-24 diopters!), a fiendish
step that by far exceeded in cruelty even the orders of Dr.
Freissler, President of the People's Court, to

187

deprive the accused of their suspenders and
belts. Second, in the same political trial (it dealt with the
distribution of fliers, and Franz Radl was sentenced to 15 months in
jail), Buchgraber ordered psychiatric treatment for this highly
intelligent student of unexceptionable character.

In other words, Szymon Wizenthal found a
kindred spirit in Graz such as he had not had since death of the
Israeli chief public prosecutor Gideon Hausner.

Wizenthal's penchant for
misinformation.

As you can see, the best means for exposing
Wizenthal is Wizenthal himself. His pleasure in making false
accusations becomes just as clear from the following passages from
his book as his lack of any morals that might alert him to the
reprehensible nature of his acts:

"So as not to place the journalist in
too difficult a position I didn't tell him that I was about to give
him a deliberately false piece of information. From the men in the
photograph I had simply picked one who had caught my eye by his
enormous projecting ears. I now told Mario: `This one is Gustav
Wagner. He's showing himself quite publicly in Brazil...'"
(JNV p. 93.)

Nothing could show more clearly the
cold-blooded and criminal quality of Wizenthal's character:

He chooses a man at random, only for sake of
his projecting ears, and with the aid of a criminal Jewish journalist
he drags his photo through the world media as that of a mass
murderer.

No serious criminologist ever availed
himself of such a low tactic, and no frivolous one ever lacked any
sense of justice so completely as to be blind to the wrongful nature
of his acts and then to even boast publicly of his iniquity.

Wizenthal "plants a
time-bomb".

Another piece of false information which
Wizenthal puts into public circulation about one of his victims is
equally low. Together with the author Forsyth he concocted a film
script whose main character was supposed to be Eduard Roschmann,
Wizenthal's prey at the time. In the context of the crimes attributed
to the hunted man's character in the film, Wizenthal brags
disgustingly:

188

"Forsyth remained in touch with me,
and we discussed the individual chapters. This enable me to plant a
further time-bomb. I asked him to insert a scene which would make
Roschmann lose the sympathies of his former comrades Forsyth had his
fugitive shoot dead a German officer in order to grab his place on an
evacuation ship during the German retreat." (JNV p. 99.
)

So Wizenthat, proud and gleeful, announces
that he falsely accused a German officer of a heinous crime which
Wizenthal knows full well he never committed, and that he did so
publicly, in a movie which later actually played around the world.

We see, therefore, that Wizenthal's own
admissions prove that he possesses such depravity of character that
one can really not put it past him to fill the atrocious role of
coordinator of a worldwide clique of Jewish false witnesses.

Wizenthal buys
information.

In Wizenthal's accounts the individuals who
can be bought are always SS-men who have "come down in the world".
(It's strange that all former SS-men whom I myself have known always
struck me as very correct and proper, even in advanced age.) At one
point in his book, Wizenthal has such a product of his imagination
waltz into his office and make the following demand in return for the
address of the commandant of Treblinka:

Of course Wizenthal is deeply outraged by
this "filthy man". He knows full well that for the sake of his image
in his readers' eyes he must now put on a bit of an act, so that his
love of treason should not also seem like love of the traitor:

"I pressed my hands against my desk
top so as not to strike him in the face... `You don't get a penny
from me today,' I said, `but if Stangl is arrested on the strength of
your information you shall have the money."` (JNV p.
85.)

That is Szymon Wizenthal's grisly world.
That's how he lives. That's how he works.

189

Wizenthal, the hub of the witness
wheel:
Endless supply of witnesses for individual murders.

On page 17 (JNV, foreword) it states
clearly:

"Wiesenthal produced seventeen
witnesses of personal murders committed by Murer."

On pages 152-153 Wizenthal
reveals:

"Meanwhile we were sending out
photographs of the Braunsteiner woman to every victims' association
we knew of, and soon we were receiving witnesses' reports from a
great variety of countries... Nevertheless, at Mr. Longo's request,
we brought two witnesses from Yugoslavia to Henna, where they made
statements in 1968. Two witnesses were also questioned at the US
embassy in Warsaw."

This establishes the very thing that the
totally uninformed sworn court expert Professor Dr. Jagschitz,
testifying at my trial in May 1992, professed not to believe:

Namely, that there is a global witness
procurement machinery whose reservoir is made up of the so-called
victims' associations, whose leading participants are the Israeli and
American Ambassadors posted at the required locations, and whose
figurehead is Szymon Wizenthal.

Sending photographs of the accused around
the world, revamping embassies to serve as satellite courts, and the
assumption of the examining magistrate's agendas by American and
Israeli embassy staff indicate both the extent and the identity of
the anti-German forces here at work. Such machinations have no
foundation in "rule of law".

On page 204 of Justice Not Vengeance
we learn:

"The Israeli police had meanwhile, at
our (how odd that Wizenthal always speaks of himself and his
alleged "one-man operation" in the plural) request, questioned
four further witnesses against Hrabatyn and passed their depositions
on to the Canadian embassy. Eventually we also heard from witnesses
who were themselves living in Canada and who were willing to give
evidence in court. From the point of view of the criminal
investigation the case seemed to be wrapped up."

In the last sentence Wizenthal errs: it is
not from the point of view of the criminal investigation, but from
the point of view of the procurement of witnesses, that the case is
wrapped up - and not the Hrabatyn case either, but the Wizenthal
case.

Speaking of himself in the plural, as he is
wont to do, Wizenthal reveals (JNV p. 266):

190

"We even made a last legal attempt:
Frau Erna Birnbach accused Bender of the murder of her cousin
Blauner... at the Plaszow concentration camp."

This attempt as well is not legal, but
criminal and constitutes the procurement of false witness
testimonies.

On page 274 of JNV Wizenthal continues
referring to himself and his small office in the "royal We". What he
says speaks volumes:

"From Israel we received the names of
fourteen Viennese Jews who had survived... and could give evidence on
H6ffle's activities."

And on p. 306 he instructs us in the many
different uses a journalist may have in Wizenthalian strategy:

"On the other hand I discovered the
testimony of a Yugoslav journalist, Hrvoje MacanoviÀ, who had
given evidence against Gogl in Zagreb, and within a short time an
appeal by the organization of Mauthausen exprisoners was
overwhelmingly successful."

On p. 284 we once again meet one of those
young Jews that like to drop in on Wizenthal:

"In February 1980 a young man by the
name of Vadim Meniker turned up at my office: he had been sent to
Vienna by the Jewish Agency ...."

"As the statute of limitations for
murder had not yet expired, and as I was now in possession of an
important new piece of testimony and, moreover, could at any time
obtain a second one - from David Meniker - 1... requested Prosecutor
General Karl Marschall..." (JNV p. 287.)

Well, finally Wizenthal comes clean about
the bottorn line: being able to "obtain testimony at any time" -
that's the subculture we find when we examine Wizenthal.

How embarrassing: the employees greet
their boss.

On p. 307 of Justice Not Vengeance
Wizenthal lifts another veil:

"I myself had made it a practice,
wherever possible, not to attend a trial, because witnesses would
invariably come up to talk to me (yes, of course)and this would then be interpreted by defence counsel as attempts
on my part to influence their evidence...(you're
joking) The Gogl case had been well prepared There were
unquestionable and convincing testimonies by witnesses. But
the atmosphere surrounding the trial..." (JNV p. 307.)

Witness for the prosecution
cracks.

The following quotation demonstrates how
Wizenthal deals with a witness whom he has deemed worthy of appearing
for the prosecution and who then, in a fit of remorse, actually
reveals the truth. On p. 308 he simply brands such a man as a
criminal, disregarding completely the fact that only moments before
he had been ready to send him to court as credible witness:

"A second testimony likewise was out
of the ordinary: it was by a witness called Magnus Keller who had
been appointed camp elder by the SS .... During his interrogation by
the Allied military tribunal in Dachau in 1946 Keller had still stood
squarely by the prisoners and had called Gogl one of the most
dangerous murderers... But in the Linz trial Keller's testimony had
suddenly changed: he could not recall his evidence to the American
military tribunal; all he knew about Gogl was that he had been a
protector of the prisoners."

What is interesting here is Wizenthal's
phrase, "...still stood squarely by the prisoners...". So Wizenthal
differentiates not between truth and falsehood, but between standing
by the prisoners and standing by the accused. There is no middle
ground in his black-and-white world. With the help of the OSI (Office
of Special Investigations), and with the help of Israeli public
prosecutors and judges who suborn witnesses all over the world by
paying them personal visits, in the course of which they suggest
events and arrange for testimony that did not even yet exist at the
time the victim in question had been selected - with the help of all
this, the backing for Wizenthal's forays is assured.

24

Szymon Wizenthal's 32
Miracles

Suddenly Szymon claims that what
justified the SS guards' existence in the eyes of the National
Socialist leadership was not the elimination, but the "tending" of
Jews (see 8th Miracle). Why were the last witnesses who would
incriminate the SS being fattened up?

1st Miracle.

"Both of them were Nazis. [..]
Within their own sphere - in addition to the forced labour men they
had fifty German railway officials under them - they saw to it
strictly that the Jews were treated fairly. Not even in the Third
Reich was there an official order that Jews must be beaten, spat on
or left to starve. "(JNV p. 9. )

Nothing is more typical of Szymon
Wizenthal's penchant for lying and story-telling than the quantity
and quality of the miracles he was favored with. He describes it as
miraculous that his superior officer Kohlrautz treated him well. And
Wizenthal admits, truthfully for once, that there was no order in the
Third Reich to the effect that Jews must be beaten, spat on or
starved. Since the incomparably strict discipline in the Third Reich
made it impossible for officers to earn brownie points by violating
extant orders and laws, this miracle discovered by Wizenthal must be
exposed as non-miracle.

In his book Teufel and Verdammte,
which he wrote on the basis of his seven years in the
concentration camps, Benedikt Kautsky - that legendary
Social-Democratic and German-thinking, German-feeling Jew from
Austria - has given a clear and unequivocal testimonial showing that
acts of cruelty, excesses, and particularly murders, where these were
committed at all, were generally the province of criminal or Polish
camp overseers. By describing the proper treatment he received at the
hands of Germans as "miraculous", Wizenthal is merely attempting - as
usual for him - to portray the National Socialist regime in a
propagandistically negative, untruthful and one-sided way.

2nd Miracle.

"In the afternoon of 6 July 1941 Simon
Wiesenthal...(note the phoney spelling of the name) was
arrested and, along with about a hundred

193

lawyers, doctors and teachers, marched
to the Brygidki prison. The Jews were ordered to stand up in several
rows facing the wall and to fold their arms behind their necks.
Beside each of them was an empty wooden box A Ukrainian started the
execution by shooting from the left end of the first row; two of his
helpers flung the bodies into the boxes standing ready... This lasted
throughout an afternoon.

"Suddenly the church bells rang, and
somebody called: `Enough for now, vespers!'

This second miracle that Wizenthal serves up
shows how badly the actual victims of the persecution of Jews in the
Second World War are being disparaged by Wizenthal's mendacious
propaganda and cock-and-bull stories. On p. 36 Wizenthal tells of
bloody pogroms by Ukrainian auxiliary troops who had shot numerous
Jews after the Red Army had beaten the German Wehrmacht back. In
principle this could very well be true, since I have heard from
former members of the Wehrmacht that German soldiers, including
soldiers from the Waffen-SS, had often stood up before Jewish people
to shield them with their bodies from angry armed Ukrainians who,
blinded by the belief that all Jews were collectively responsible for
the crimes of Jewish-Bolshevist murderers, were after their blood.
But what does Wizenthal, who obviously knows of these dreadful events
only through hear-say, make of them? He claims that he and about 100
intellectuals were marched to the Brygidki prison where a Ukrainian
began shooting the prisoners - a barbarous act that is supposed to
have "lasted throughout an afternoon". Only the ringing of church
bells, announcing vespers, put an end to the shooting. Ten yards from
Wizenthal.

While the religious fervor of the Ukrainians
who let their work be interrupted by the tolling of church bells
already seems less than credible, it is equally unbelievable that it
should have taken an entire afternoon to fire 100 shots, even if only
one single marksman had been at work. Even if one sets the length of
the Wizenthalian afternoon at only three hours, I have calculated
that for the alleged massacre to actually have taken the entire
afternoon the bullets would have to have traversed the estimated
distance of three meters between marksman and victims at the blazing
speed of fully one centimeter per minute. And at this point I recall
that for the American "liberators" to mow down the 350 surviving
German concentration camp guards, and for Wizenthal's concentration
camp buddies to liquidate the wounded who had survived the massacre,
only took a few minutes. (See Buechner, The Hour of the Avenger,
and the photos on pp. ff., this volume.)

194

So the murderers from among the ranks of the
American Army and the liberated concentration camp inmates evidently
worked 30 to 100 times faster than the "industrial-style mass murder
machinery" of the Third Reich. Embarrassing - very embarrassing.

Beyond that, Wizenthal must also be informed
in this context that his fantastic witnesses (and my attorney Dr.
Schaller has copies of the relevant documents in his possession)
claimed that two men armed with small-caliber guns murdered 30,000
people in Treblinka per day. Thus, the snail's-pace massacre which
Wizenthal expects us to believe took an entire afternoon and
culminated in his salvation by the vesper bells degenerates into an
armchair miracle.

The Second Wizenthal Miracle no doubt took
place in his absence. The old fraud only jokes with horror.

3rd Miracle.

"The SS intended to celebrate the
Führer's birthday with a sacrifice of Jews.

"Those selected for execution by
shooting, about twenty men, were made to stand by the so-called
`tube' [...] For the second time in his life Wiesenthal was -
almost like the doctor's, `Next please' - waiting for his death.
[..]

"Wiesenthal's rescuers were Germans,
and members of the Nazi party. [..] at the camp office
[one] demanded the return of his `painter'. A big banner with
a swastika on a white ground had to be urgently painted in time for
the celebrations that afternoon." (JNV p. 9-10,
foreword by P. M. L.)

The third miracle begins almost before the
second is properly finished. Wizenthal claims that the SS wished to
celebrate the Führer's birthday (April 20, 1943) by sacrificing
some Jews. This allegation of "ritual murder" should be examined by a
psychoanalyst. Due to the severe punishment that was imposed for
high-handed excesses committed against Jews (cf. p. ), such an event
- which, incidentally, is in complete contradiction of Kautsky's
shocking accounts of everyday concentration camp life - seems utterly
unbelievable. Nothing of the sort ever took place, and not even all
the manipulated and falsified "war crimes trial files" put together
will turn up any such "birthday party".

But let's continue with Wizenthal's story:
just as his turn was about to come, a German superior rushed up and
demanded that Wizenthal, the artistically talented, return with him
to the land of the living, there to paint

195

swastikas. Wizenthal thanks his savior, who,
incidentally, was a member of the National Socialist party, and cites
him as "proof that there is no such thing as collective guilt". At
which point one must ask oneself why the children of Szymon's savior
are not then exempt from having to pay restitution.

And another question: must one have saved
Wizenthal's life in order to be exempted by him from collective
guilt? Or should one not also exempt those 80 million other Germans
who shot no Jews on the Führer's birthday, from the
responsibility for murder and mayhem?

4th Miracle.

"In 1943, when the SS started to
deport the last surviving Jewish forced labourers from industrial
plants, the Nazi Kohlrautz encouraged Simon Wiesenthal to escape.
`What more are you waiting for?'[..] As an escort he chose
for him a feeble-minded Ukrainian police auxiliary..."
(JNV p. 10-11, foreword by P.M. L.)

The fourth miracle as well, another in the
unbroken chain of divine interventions that ensured Wizenthal's
deliverance, proves that Wizenthal constantly encountered noble and
humane National Socialists: Nazi Kohlrautz again helped him to
escape, at the risk of his own life.

That feeble-minded persons are rather rare
in police service is just an aside.

The next miracle wasn't long in
coming.

196

5th Miracle.

"SS and Polish police officers in
civilian clothes searched the nearby houses for hidden weapons.
[..] He was marched off for the third time to, as he
believed, his certain execution." (JNV p. 11, foreword
by P.M.L.)

Before we examine the fifth miracle we must
note that Wizenthal's curriculum vitae has now been cleansed of an
embarrassing cock-and-bull story: in the post-1945 affidavit he had
stated that at this point in his life he had been "in the woods,
fighting the Germans", and had attained a high officer's rank as
partisan virtually overnight. JNV no longer mentions this
whopping lie: instead, Wizenthal now makes his way to the home of
Jewish friends and prefers a hideaway under the floorboards to the
rough lifestyle of a partisan. And so the way is clear for the fifth
miracle: Wizenthal is discovered, but not - as allegedly usual - shot
by the SS for his attempted escape, but instead is spared.

6th Miracle.

"...while being taken to the Gestapo
he cut his wrists with a razor blade he kept hidden in his clothes.
The Gestapo nursed him back to health in prison, on special rations,
in order to shoot him according to regulations." (JNV p.
11, foreword by P.M. L.)

Strangely enough, Wizenthal is then taken to
the Gestapo - something that was absolutely not customary where
Jewish prisoners were concerned. Here, Wizenthal claims, he cut his
wrists with a razor blade. And now Wizenthal once again mistakes the
matter-of-fact correctness and decency of the German authorities for
divine providence when he reports that the Gestapo nursed him back to
health on special rations.

But the next miracle was already waiting in
the wings.

197

7th Miracle.

"The camp commandant, SS
Hauptsturmführer Friedrich Warzog, welcomed him with great
cordiality as `one of my regulars. He introduced him to his
colleagues as the `prodigal son returned home.'" (JNV p.
11-12, foreword by P.M.L.)

SS-Hauptsturmführer Friedrich
Warzog, instead of executing the returned refugee as was allegedly
usual, greeted him, as Wizenthal himself says, "with great
cordiality" as "one of his regulars", and introduced him to his
colleagues as "the prodigal son returned home". Wizenthal comments on
this seventh miracle by adding that "it is well-nigh impossible for
anyone not familiar with the conditions then to believe in such
capricious twists of fate". (JNV p. 12.)

He completely fails to realize that his
account of the "miracles" he has enjoyed by no means tells of
"capricious twists of fate" but rather of a continuous sequence of
correct and humane treatment at the hands of the spokespersons of the
National Socialist power. It is therefore completely out of place,
and in contradiction of Wizenthal's previous accounts, for our friend
to add here: "The absolute power which the SS had arrogated to
itself over the lives of humans would now and again, after a thousand
murders, manifest itself in someone, without any reason, being
granted life." Szymon forgets that this favor was bestowed,
not on just "someone", but on him, and not once, but
incessantly.

8th Miracle.

"Wiesenthal's absurd salvation from
death was followed a few days later by a clemency order. The reasons
were entirely rational: the SS needed to have prisoners to guard
[..] SS men without specific duties were being sent to the
front. Thus the thirty-four Jews who had survived along with
Wiesenthal became a life insurance for two hundred SS men. Warzog,
who no doubt had been considering what they had best say if taken
prisoner by the Russians, invited the Jews to form `a big family'
with the SS men." (JNV p. 12, foreword by P.M.L.)

A short time later Wizenthal enjoys
additional clemency by being formally spared any disciplinary action
relating to his attempted escape; yet such disciplinary measures are
the norm in camps of all warring powers.

But all this clemency is coming to be too
much even for Wizenthal himself. Probably to prevent his readers from
growing suspicious, Wizenthal

198

hastens to strip this leniency of any
possible humanitarian motives and to supply base motives instead in a
hair-raising explanatory tale: he alleges that the SS only let him
live because they needed Jews to guard so as not to be sent to the
front to join the fighting forces.

To save the lives of Wizenthal and 33 other
Jews, 200 SS-men were given permission to retreat? In the Third
Reich?

Such a claim can only be made out of
complete and total ignorance of the realities in the German
concentration camps, where the so-called Kapo system permitted a
ratio of 1:100 between the guards and the guarded. Wizenthal fails to
realize that by making this claim he denies that the Third Reich
could have wanted to "exterminate" the Jews at all.

He forgets that according to the official
version of things, the job of the SS was to exterminate the Jews, not
to take tender care of them.

Embarrassing. Very embarrassing.

In the course of his eighth miracle,
Wizenthal attempts to revise the above ratio to one of 7:1. And he
has nothing but acid scorn for SS-Hauptsturmführer Warzog
who, in view of the imminent joint retreat, "invited the Jews to
form'a big family' with the SS men".

At this point Wizenthal stretches his
readers' credulity to the breaking point: he claims that the SS-men
had let him and the other 33 Jews live so that they would provide a
sort of "life insurance" for the SS who would thus not look so very
bad if they were taken prisoner by the Russians. Szymon forgets that
he normally tries to make people believe that the SS, quite to the
contrary, used to assure their protection by eliminating all
witnesses, accessories and accomplices - which would be quite
credible if one were to believe the alleged atrocities. He neglects
to give us any kind of explanation for this downright idiotic
deviation from the alleged standard practice, i.e. for the apparently
nonsensical exception that let witnesses to alleged murder and
manslaughter remain alive. In situations where "life insurance",
according to Wizenthal, normally consisted of murder, we can hardly
assume that the selfsame "life insurance" simultaneously required the
SS men to share their last piece of bread.

Wizenthal has failed to see that the
fattening of the incriminating witnesses is the real miracle which he
should explain to us in this context!

199

24 more miracles.

"After being arrested by the Nazis in
1941, he spent the years until the end of the war in a total
of twelve concentration camps."(Back cover of
Recht, nicht Rache, the German original of Justice Not
Vengeance.)

But these eight miracles, quoted from a
single chapter of Wizenthal's book, do not make up the whole of
Wizenthal's cock-and-bull stories. You, my reader, should also know
that Szymon claims (back cover, Recht, nicht Rache) to have
done time in a total of twelve concentration camps. [Translator's
note: at least, that's what he claimed in his book Recht, nicht
Rache, the German original of Justice Not Vengeance. By
the time this book was translated into English, he changed his mind:
in JNV, p. 7, he now claims to have survived only "half a dozen"
concentration camps. Can't he make up his mind?] And anyone who
has taken a closer look at our subject will no longer be surprised to
find that in his (perjurious) affidavits Wizenthal is able to name
only two known camps (see pages and ), and only from the last stage
of the Second World War, indicating that his "fate of persecution"
obviously did not begin until after the "Holo", from which he was
just as obviously exempted. But what could be logical about the
thoughts and actions of a man who has for almost half a century made
his living by fraud and sought his satisfaction in slander?

If we were to assume for a moment that
Wizenthal really had been imprisoned in twelve different
concentration camps, and if we subtract the miracle of his liberation
by the American occupiers (though in actual fact the camp was not
"liberated", but handed over to the Red Cross by the Germans), 23
further miracles remain: on every arrival in a concentration camp,
according to Wizenthal, a "selection" determined life or death for
the arrivals, 90% of which allegedly did not survive this selection
process. A statistician should draw up a probability analysis of
Wizenthal's collection of miracles - it would be just one more way to
demonstrate the nonsense contained therein.

In order for Wizenthal to leave one
concentration camp for another, another selection must have been made
as per certain other criteria; we therefore find eleven more
Wizenthal Miracles.

There is one miracle which does strike me as
truly wondrous and which also seemed thus to Austria's Chancellor Dr.
Kreisky, to whom this book is dedicated, but which Wizenthal cannot
and will not appreciate as such a divine manifestation: namely, that
in the days of the German fronts' fateful ,struggle for life and
death, in whose service the last reserves of strength of

200

the Reich and the German Railway were
placed, enough of the crucially valuable road and rail transport
capacity could be spared to enable the genuinely miraculous and
rationally inexplicable travel activities - covering thousands of
kilometers amid the chaos of total war - of our brilliant fraud
Szymon Wizenthal of Galicia.

"...none of the accused in the
post-1945 Nazi trials disputed the existence of
gaschambers."(Kurier, Vienna, December 10, 1989.)

"...like nearly all Nazis in virtually
all their trials - Lerch denied everything: he had done nothing and
he had known nothing; ...." (JNV p. 281.)

Perhaps the most shameless but also most
vitally essential lie spouted by Szymon Wizenthal is the claim that
he has repeatedly made without being contradicted, namely, that in
all the post-1945 trials the captured SS guards and officers had
admitted (i.e. not disputed) the existence of gas chambers.

In the Austrian newspaper Kurier of
December 10, 1989, for example. Wizenthal said:

"If Herr Weiss has studied this
matter, he should know that none of the accused in the post-1945 Nazi
trials disputed the existence of gas chambers. All they disputed was
the role they themselves had played."

He still insisted on this claim as late as
1990, in the brochure Amoklauf gegen die Wirklichkeit,
published by the Documentary Archives of the Austrian Resistance
in complicity with the Federal Austrian Ministry of Education and
Culture under its Minister Scholten (real name: Pfefferkorn). On page
5 of this brochure Wizenthal alleges with impunity:

"I was in the audience at the trial
that took place in 1968 in Düsseldorf against Franz Stangl, the
commandant of the extermination camp Treblinka.. In his testimony
Stangl tried to win the court's sympathy for the difficulties he had
had to manage. As proof of the difficult nature of his job he
reported that on some days 18,000 Jews were 'delivered' by rail who
had to be marched into the gas chambers, pulled out again and finally
buried."

This testimony stands in irreconcilable
contradiction to the opinion of Franz Stangl's wife who, according to
Wizenthal himself, said with respect to her husband's work:

"`My husband was a decent, proper man
who did his duty,' she said about the work of the commandant of
Treblinka; `he never laid hands on an inmate, at most he had to shout
at one of them now and again..." (JNV p. 92. )

This is reinforced by another quotation from
Wizenthal's opus, where he repeats Stangl's own words at this
Düsseldorf show trial:

"I only did my duty." (JNV
p. 87.)

208

This can hardly be construed as an attempt
by the defendant to justify the existence of a gas chamber.

Wizenthal also forgets that Stangl's deputy,
Kurt Franz. is still alive today, serving a life prison term.
Wizenthal also forgets that in the Demjanjuk trial the court in
Israel decided to do without Kurt Franz as witness even though he
would have been the only one there in a position to identify the
accused, Demjanjuk; the court feared that Franz would not only
exonerate Demjanjuk but call the gas chamber of Treblinka itself into
question (cf Rullmann. Der Fall Demjanjuk, pp. 178f.).

In the same foreword to the brochure
Amoklauf gegen die Wirklichkeit Wizenthal also claims that the
existence of gas chambers had been confirmed by another authoritative
source:

"In the early 1970s a trial was held
in Vienna against Walter Dejaco and Josef Ertl of the Auschwitz
Central Building Administration. The two SS officers had carried out
or supervised the construction of the gas chambers and crematoria. In
the course of the trial Dejaco said that prior to the construction of
the gassing facilities in Auschwitz leis superior had sent him to
Kulmhof to examine and study a similar facility there. In that
facility, the exhaust gas from powerful automobile engines was being
piped into sealed rooms, asphyxiating the people locked into these
rooms." (Amoklaufgegen die Wirklichkeit, p. 5.)

Wizenthal lies. Dejaco and Ertl, the two SS
officers with the longest service records to serve in the immediate
vicinity of the alleged gas chamber, were acquitted by the court,
which would be inconceivable if they had played the key roles in the
"National Socialist mass murders". Interestingly, precisely this most
significant testimony regarding the alleged murder weapon of the
"Holocaust" has gone missing from the archives of the Vienna District
Court, and neither the charge nor the testimony of the accused can be
reconstructed from the verdict, which remains.

However, from Robert Verbelen, who attended
this trial as spectator and who was in touch with the defendants, I
know that these defendants had not been charged with the construction
of a gas chamber, but exclusively in connection with the construction
of the crematoria. The acquittals were handed down because the
accused were able to prove that the devastating typhus epidemic,
which could not be brought under control in Auschwitz for two years
despite the disinfestation of clothing and barracks with the
disinfestation agent Zyklon B, made the construction of the
crematoria imperative in order to cremate the bodies of up to 150
typhus victims daily.

One must ask oneself who could have a vested
interest in the disappearance of what are perhaps the most
significant post-War trial files, and the

209

answer is clear: only that side which is
eager to falsity the actual trial proceedings

Since trial files - especially when they
take up half a cubic meter - cannot spontaneously vanish without a
trace, least of all from the bestguarded building in Austria, it
seems reasonable to suppose that these tiles were quietly removed
with collaboration from among the highest echelons.

In order to expose, in all its audacity,
Wizenthal's indispensable lie of the "SS guards who confessed", we
shall now examine this claim in the context of each of the twelve
"war criminals" whose cases Wizenthal calls "typical" (JNV p.
vii), and shall expose Wizenthal's lies in the easiest way
possible: through Wizenthal himself.

Even university professor Jagschitz, a
member of the Wizenthal lobby and the man against whom I have brought
criminal charges for drawing up a false and dishonest "court expert
report", admitted in court that a number of SS men persisted in
disputing the existence of gas chambers, even before Allied tribunals
in both East and West and despite the devastating personal
consequences such an action had.

In the context of those of Wizenthal's lies
which I shall expose here, however, I do not ask the reader to take
my word for the old hatemonger's mendacity; I merely wish to give
everyone and anyone, regardless of his political and ideological
standpoint, the opportunity to draw his own conclusions regarding the
notorious liar Wizenthal, based on his very own testimonials. For on
page 281 of JNV, the work of Wizenthal's old age, he writes
exactly the opposite of what he wrote in Amoklauf gegen die
Wirklichkeit, the Austrian Ministry of Education's hatemongering
piece of incitement, and what he likes to spout on other occasions
(see aforementioned) in various newspapers and other statements:
"...like nearly all Nazis in virtually all their trials
- Lereh denied everything: he had done nothing and he had known
nothing;..."

We can see that Wizenthal's lies are best
refuted by Wizenthal himself.

A list of those who were "in the know" about
what was happening in the concentration camps, yet who were not
willing to confirm the "existence of gas chambers" as desired, has
yet to be drawn up. One day, however, such a list will be headed by
the name of the last commandant of Auschwitz. He was Richard Baer,
and despite being in the best of health, he died under mysterious
circumstances in prison.

To summarize: Szymon Wizenthal's claim that
no-one among the accused in the post-1945 war crimes trials had
disputed the existence of gas chambers is a brazen lie that can be
refuted with numerous

210

examples. One of many: Reich Marshal
Hermann Goring, who, faced with certain death, nonetheless engaged
the American prosecutor Jackson in a fierce battle, in the course of
which he relegated the gas chambers to the realm of mendacious Allied
propaganda.

Those for whom National Socialist "mass
murders" in the Third Reich are truly a heart's desire should not
base their arguments on liars. Or on lies.

The majority of the people mentioned in this
book who were alleged to have committed war crimes either
demonstrably disputed the gas chambers or are thought, on the basis
of compelling logic, to have disputed them - suspicions which,
however, have not been conclusively confirmed due to the deliberate
inaccessibility of trial files (Eichmann case). Most of them - see
the chapter "Murder in Wizenthal's Footsteps" - died under mysterious
circumstances.

Macabre nonsense.

Wizenthallives on the fact that his numerous
books are bought but not read. However, if one commits to the painful
task of actually plowing through his mediocre concoctions, one finds
the most bizarre twaddle and tall tales where horror is made the
subject for entertainment. For example, a court expert once pointed
out to me, years ago already, that in one of his first books
Wizenthal claimed that the "pioneers division" of the SS had leveled
a six-meter-deep crater left by a Russian artillery grenade on an
airfield, by shooting a thousand Jews into it and then covering this
foundation with a new concrete base. The expert informed me that the
Red Army had not had any artillery grenades capable of producing
six-meterdeep craters. But what difference do numbers make to a man
of such a stripe as our Galician fraud? Six meters or six million, he
uses them without a second thought, safe in the knowledge that he can
rely almost one hundred percent on the Western democratic nations'
media and their solidarity.

The aforementioned expert also pointed out
that bodies, which consist largely of water, are useless as a
foundation for a concrete slab, and that the pressure exerted by
landing airplanes would perforce have turned the alleged repair job
into a death trap.

I have tried to find examples of this kind
of yarn in Wizenthal's latest book as well so as to demonstrate the
niveau on which this propagandistic barnstormer and quack operates.
One example:

"In psychologically well-constructed
thrillers there is almost invariably a simple explanation: the
phantom which kills one disabled person after

211

another is always revealed, at the end
of the film, as a disabled person himself, a sick person trying to
conceal his sickness from the world This film plot explanation of
Hitler's actions is found also in the work of several historians: the
British historian Alan Bullock... proceeds from the thesis that the
young Hitler had been infected with .syphilis by a prostitute."
(JNV p. 130.)

And further:

"The Austrian doctor[Dr. Ronald] also claimed to (rave learned from his
father details about the origin of Hitler's syphilis: prior to tile
First World War he had been infected in Kenna by a Jewish prostitute.
(... j It was also significant that, as early as Mein Kampf,
Hitler stressed the particular importance of the fight against
venereal disease." (JNV p. 13 I -132. )

As in all his blatherings, Wizenthal forgets
that the same conclusion can also be applied, with devastating
precision, to himself: for if someone who fights venereal disease
must therefore be suffering from venereal disease himself, then the
persecution and punishment of sadists - of which Wizenthal has
allegedly found an extraordinarily high number, 10%, among the German
people as a whole (and 100% among the concentration camp commandants)
- might well also be motivated by an inborn tendency to sadism.

On pages 132-133 Wizenthal suggests in all
seriousness that German magazines should invest money in research
about Hitler's syphilis. This suggestion is so surprising because
Wizenthal normally condemns as "neoNazi crimes and provocation", all
calls for material evidence, eg. for the existence of gas chambers,
or the request to obtain the usual scientific expertises which are
the norm in all other criminological investigations the world over
but which have never yet been carried out in our context.

I think it would be a much more promising
line of investigation to carry out excavations in the
football-field-sized "death camp Treblinka" to see if there really
were mass graves for one million people there, as "Holocaust" studies
claim there were, than to try to verify the condition of Adolf
Hitler's genitals in 1917. And most of all, the excavations in
Treblinka would be much more significant for shoring up the
increasingly contested "Holocaust", and also more physically
possible, as the constant discoveries of mass graves on former East
German and Soviet soil, of people murdered by the antiFascists,
clearly show.

When it comes to defending Jews and their
crimes, Wizenthal flails wildly. The following quotation gives us a
taste of what Wizenthal understands by "justice":

"Anyone expecting that Jews could
never commit a war crime, never persecute someone unjustly, or
perhaps even never kill, merely shows that

212

he still does not regard us as the
equals of other nations - equals in good and in evil. Anyone siding
with us only as long as we play the part of victim has, in a
different way, remained the same old anti-Semite." (JNV p.
224-225. )

I would take it as a sign of equality if
Szymon of Galicia, that Nazi hunter tormented by his need for
justice, were to pursue Jewish criminals with the same zest. His
interpretation of "equality" and "Justice", however, suggests that
even the mere criticism of Jewish crimes indicates anti-Semitism.
Wizenthal ought to remember that the demand for equality between Jews
and non-Jews attacks the very foundations of the state of Israel's
existence. In this context I only recall the immigration of
"nonGermans" which Wizenthal and all the Jewish organizations in
Austria and the Federal Republic of Germany demand for Central
Europe!

If the same principle were applied to the
state of Israel - and the day will come when this demand is made, as
revenge for the genocide through immigration - it would mean the end
of the Jewish state's racial exclusiveness. Selective immigration
into a Jewish state on the basis of racial characteristics would be
just as unthinkable as the further preservation of a closed Jewish
settlement area on this planet.

On page 225 Wizenthal continues in
the same tone:

"A war crime is committed by whoever
instals a military position in the middle of a civilian residential
area, so that in the event q( hostilities the civilian population
must inevitably suffer." (JNV p. 225. )

With that, Wizenthal concedes that Major
Reder was justified in his use of grenade launchers in his attack on
the positions of the "Stella Rossa" in the Marzabotto region. In
other words, Wizenthal had repeatedly and with obvious relish called
an innocent man a war criminal.

But Wizenthal's hypocritical and
unconditional defense of Israel and his uncritical attitude to crimes
committed by Israel continues. In the course of his
propagandistically one-sided and favorable account of the Jewish
state's military actions, he states:

"Only this can explain the delighted
enthusiasm with which the German and Austrian press took up the
massacres of Sabra and Shatila. Here, finally, the equation was
complete: the Germans committed mass murder of helpless people - the
Jews do exactly the same when they get a chance." (JNV p.
225.)

Well, does Wizenthal want equality or doesnt
he? His insistence on the Jews' right to commit murder and other
crimes with impunity will hardly guarantee their future equality in
the world, but bodes ill for it instead. This is how I see the
speeches, influence, and activities of Szymon Wizenthal

213

of Galicia: blind with vanity and
presumptuousness, he is taking out a terrible mortgage on the Jewish
people's future. Paying it back can no longer be his role in this
lifetime, but will fall to a future Jewish generation whom he has
left nothing but the hatred and arrogance he has planted in their
hearts.

Another rabbit from Szymon's hat: he claims
that "at Sabra and Shatila it was not Israelis who did the
murdering", but Christian militias. He conveniently forgets that it
was the Israelis who not only opened the gates to the Christian
militias but also watched their activities, hoping that they would
butcher the innocents for them without the world ever finding out.

And he also forgets that he has repeatedly
placed the Ukrainian excesses at the Germans' door, even though he
ought to know that the Wehrmacht, wherever it came on the scene, put
a stop to the excesses committed by the Ukrainians. Wizenthal,
specialized on hatred and propaganda against Germans alone, has also
never called for restitution from the Ukrainians. That's the sort of
equality he means.

Texas.

Wizenthal, whose tools of the trade include
an ever-grave mien in public, likes to laugh long and often when he
feels unobserved - as we see in this book. Few people, however, know
that in his books a gruesome and distasteful sense of humor often
gets the better of his control, signaling his pleasure in his
profession - namely, dealing in horrors - no less than his lack of
good taste.

Thus, to the question when Israel would
return the land it stole from the Palestinians, he answered:

"`You want a date from me?' I asked,
to gain a little time for reflection.

"`Yes, a precise date,' came the
answer from about twenty voices in unison.

"`Very well,' I said, `I'll try.' In
the front row of the auditorium sat several representatives
of the Jewish organizations which had invited me, staring at
me with a mixture of despair and horror. They clearly thought
I had gone out of my mind I tried to reassure them by a slight
nod before giving my answer as calmly and slowly as possible: `The
precise date will be one day after the Americans have returned Texas
to Mexico."' (JNV p. 227.)

That is the style which Wizenthal deems
appropriate for dealing with the question of the occupied Palestinian
territories and of the expelled Palestinians. For unspeakable human
suffering, for the day-in, day-out

214

murder of unarmed teenagers by Israeli armed
forces as part of the "intifada", he can spare nothing but a nasty
jest.

And yet he himself is highly touchy and
oversensitive when others do the same: for example, he alleges that
the liberal local party representative from Bad St. Leonhardt in
Carinthia (Standard, November 1, 1990) had said to him:
"We're already building ovens again, but not for you, Herr
Wiesentbal - you'll fit into Jörgl's pipe." ("Jörgl"'
refers to Jörg Haider, the representative of Austria's Liberal
Party.)

Wizenthal commented on the village
representative's words with great outrage: "...the worst thing I
have ever heard. "

He forgets that he himself has bragged - not
only in the book here at issue, but in other unbearable concoctions
as well - that he "doesn't have Nazis for breakfast "
Elsewhere he invents a meeting of right-wing extremists and a member
who asks: "Is it true that you eat a Nazi for breakfast every
day?" (ef also JNV p. 346.)

Deep emotion at his own quick-wittedness is
evident in his reply: "Idon't eat pork."

A man who slanders anyone and everyone who
was in the NSDAP (my parents, for example) with the sweeping label
"pork" has forfeited every right not to be "smoked in a pipe".

But that's what our Galician upholder of
moral standards is like: ever ready to crack a joke at horror.

On p. 227 Wizenthal gives us another sample
of his sophistry. Regarding Israel:

"Some day it will have to be realized
that it is impossible to establish a state without some people, who
have been living in the region, finding their rights curtailed
(Because where no people have lived before it is presumablv
impossible for people to live.)" (INV p. 227.)

Well said, Wizenthal! And now it is also
clear why Hitler wanted to establish a great empire in the East:
Because where no people have lived before, it is presumably
impossible for people to live. And that the rights of those who have
been living in a region are curtailed has now been lovingly excused
by Wizenthal - if one presumes the equality of the regimes involved.
Wizenthal then adds brazenly, with regard to Israel:

"There could have been living space
for all." (INV p. 227. )

That isn't new either - the Führer
already said it in his time.

To further protect his ideal world, which
consists of Jews being permitted to do wrong and non-Jews being
forced to grin and bear it, Wizenthal continues with another fib:

215

"The Italians have granted the South
Tyroleans a large measure of autonomy, and I doubt whether a
plebiscite there would nowadays go in Austria's favour."
(JNV p. 228. )

And he adds one of his touching
anecdotes:

"For my grandson's bar-mitzvah my
daughter invited her Arab friends as well. They brought their
children along, and thus their children and our children played
together." (JNV p. 228.)

Just as Wizenthal keeps two good "pet
Nazis", namely Günthert and Kohlrautz, he also pulls some Arab
children out of his sleeve to play with his grandson at his
bar-mitzvah.

How gracious!

Wizenthal's statistics.

Wizenthal is constantly at loggerheads with
figures. But that doesn't matter. The German leftists, the stooges
of the American occupiers in Germany, greedily and
uncritically suck up every word that falls from his lips. And he
appears to be particularly fond of "ten percent", a concept with
which he is perhaps familiar from commissions earned in his youth:

On p. 151, for example, he sets the
proportion of sadists among concentration camp staff at ten
percent. Wizenthal also gives the number of Jews who he wishes us
to believe survived the "Holocaust" as ten percent. (cf Der
Standard, January 20, 1992.) However, from a begging
letter published and distributed in Germany by official Jewish
sources (cf p.) we learn that in 1990, 200,000 survivors of the
"Holocaust" lived in Israel alone. Due to the natural mortality rate,
only one-tenth of the generation that experienced World War Two
first-hand could still have been alive at that time (similar
demographic studies have been made in Austria, regarding the
population there), so this means that two million "Holocaust"
survivors immigrated to Israel alone after the Second World War. If
we assume for the moment that these were all the "Holocaust"
survivors - i.e. that another two million "Holocaust" survivors had
not emigrated overseas after the Second World War, and that yet
another two million Jews from Hitler's sphere of influence had not
survived in the Soviet Union - then according to Wizenthal's figures
20 million Jews must have ended up in Hitler's concentration camps in
Europe. (Since two million Israeli "Holocaust" survivors equal ten
percent of 20 million.) If, on the other hand. we do not disregard
the survivors in other parts of the world, it would mean that 60
million Jews had been at Hitler's mercy.

216

So you see, dear reader, that Wizenthal has
a hard time with statistics. Added to this is the fact that some four
million applications have been made for restitution payments. Since
we do believe in the good in mankind, we shall presume that so far
applications for restitution payments have only been made by the
living. But if four million Jews survived the "Holocaust" and then
applied for restitution from Germany, and if - as Wizenthal would
have us believe - the percentage of survivors is really no more than
10%, then it would nonetheless still have been 40 million Jews who
were taken to concentration camps for the "Final Solution".

On p. 240 of his book, Wizenthal again
expects us to throw even gradeschool mathematics out the window.

"With the assistance of the UGIF, his
'Jupos' and only a handful of SS men, he had the country 'cleansed of
Jews' within a mere fourteen months. " (JNV p. 240.)

Wizenthal serves us this lie in the context
of Alois Brunner's work in France. As anyone can confirm for himself,
more than 700,000 Jews are living in France today; there has been no
word of any immigration of nonEuropean Jews to France in such
numbers, and since we won't reasonably expect yet another
700,000-fold "Holocaust survivor" miracle, we can only assume that
the German executives were never in fact given the task of
"cleansing" France of all its Jews. Otherwise, that would have been
done. But I am always open to reasonable explanations.

100 x 7 = 1,700

In view of the calculations to follow, I
have to second the Austrian ex-Chancellor Dr. Kreisky's suspicion
that Wizenthal can only "allegedly" have been an accredited engineer
and architect. Given his catastrophic grasp of arithmetic (i.e. lack
thereof) - which would have doomed him to eternal repetition of, at
most, Grade Two Math - I too am beginning to think that his academic
degrees, of which he is so proud and which are proven by strange
documents, to put it mildly - as well as his other 15 or 20 academic
degrees - may be of an honorary nature at best. I quote our
storyteller verbatim:

"Deportation was arranged by means o(
a cattle truck which was attached every third day to the Nice-Paris
express, with a hundred Jews crowded into it. Over a period of three
weeks 1700 Jews were thus removed from the French Riviera to
Paris." (JNV p. 241.)

Now, my calculations show that one truck
every third day, for three weeks, makes seven trucks. If each is
filled with 100 persons- this totals 700

217

people. But the possibility that one day
someone might come along to take him at his word and actually read
one of his books is something that Wizenthal obviously did not count
on - since counting was always his weak point. He insists on 1,700.

6,000,000 - 4,000,000 - 2,500,000 =
6,000,000

Even though one could fill an entire book of
black humor with Wizenthal's catastrophic feats of arithmetic, I
shall conclude this topic with a key quote from Wizenthal:

"A person denying the existence of the
Auschwitz gas chambers is invariably either an old Nazi or a
neo-Nazi. Moreover, he is probably a ,fool, for he is venturing out
on ground where, except with children or mental defectives, he has no
chance of success. The circle of those willing to go along with his
arguments will remain extremely small, at least for the next few
decades." (JNV p. 335. )

At this point I would just like to ask
quietly why the circle of those who "deny the gas chambers" should
grow larger again in a few decades?

But let's not cut Wizenthal off:

"The professional neo-Nazi therefore
will rather tend to present Auschwitz in a relativist light He will
not deny the gas chambers but the figure of six million dead ....
" (JNV p. 335. )

At the time he wrote his book, Wizenthal
could not suspect that in the trial against me in 1992, the sworn
court expert Prof Jagschitz (in his testimony of May 5, 1992, Hv
5720/90) would claim that not four million, but at least several
hundred thousands up to a maximum of one-and-ahalf million Jews died
in Auschwitz This means that the total number of Jewish victims must
be reduced by 2.5 to 3.3 million until and unless proof is found that
an equal number more people of Jewish extraction were killed
elsewhere. Which will probably not keep Wizenthal from continuing his
Six Million Game.

In other words, if one were to take
Wizenthal's opus seriously, the court expert Prof. Jagschitz - by
reducing the number of Jewish victims by some three million - is
either an old Nazi or a neo-Nazi or, alternately, Wizenthal's theory
must be considered refuted even by people of such intellectual
caliber as his followers.

Even the Jewish newspaper Allgemeine
Judische Wochenzeitung of June 11, 1992 conceded this (see
facsimile, p. ). As late as July 26, 1990 this same newspaper had yet
supported the opinion of Wizenthal's Federal German

218

counterpart, Heinz Galinski, who tried
desperately to maintain the Four Million figure of Wizenthal's
ravings.

So this is what the academic character of
"Holocaust" research really looks like. I would also remind the
reader that Wizenthal, in a publication that appeared right after the
end of the War, presented as "historical truth" the "confession"
extorted under brutal torture from Franz Ziereis, the unfortunate
commandant of the Mauthausen concentration camp, who was interrogated
for an entire night with three bullets lodged in his gut, and who
then allegedly confessed - in Polish, without ever having had any
command of that language.

Since Wizenthal himself was an inmate in
this concentration camp, which was primarily reserved for criminals,
he knows only too well that there had never been a "gas chamber"
there. But even if one believes the official historiography - in
other words the testimony of Yehuda Bauer, the Professor of Holocaust
Studies who, with the intervention of the "Documentary Archives of
the Austrian Resistance", rescued the "gas chamber" of Mauthausen by
"discovering" it, albeit as late as 1989 - not four million, but
approximately 2,000 people were allegedly murdered with gas there.
Under the laws of mathematics Wizenthal would therefore have to
subtract roughly another four million victims from his initial six
million, unless he were to prove that these millions should be
attributed to another place instead. But a man who is not even clear
on the number of places where he was born, but lists three of the
same, a man who cannot even decide on his nationality and who in his
various affidavits describes himself alternately as national or
ethnic Polish, Jewish, German, Israeli and Austrian, can probably
also not be expected to know the difference between 2,000 and
4,000,000.

Regarding his mother's death he will also
have to make up his mind between the figures one and two: namely,
whether she died only once - in the Lemberg hospital, as he claimed
originally - or also on the transport to Auschwitz.

This is the most repulsive thing about
Wizenthal: that he doesn't even balk at involving his own mother's
death in his mission of hatred and lies.

And this is probably also the light in which
we should see Wizenthal's "100 relatives", none of which were allowed
to participate in the miracle enjoyed by the two million "Holocaust"
survivors in Israel, the 700,000 "Holocaust" survivors in France, the
one-and-a-half million additional survivors recently discovered in
the Soviet Union, and the up to two million survivors who emigrated
to America.

219

I for my part have never in my life met
anyone, least of all within the German culture group of which
Wizenthal purports to be a member, who had such a multitude of
relatives. I also have a hard time imagining that anyone could keep
track of all these relatives, least of all by name.

How Wizenthal's gas chamber lies harm the
theory of National Socialist mass murder.

"They should be made to remove with
their fingers some of the grass growing around the crematoria until
they come to the layer of splintered bones which have accumulated
there. They should be made to look into one of the ponds at the
bottom of which the skeletons lie to this day, and they should be
conducted by someone who had gone through all this himself."

This blather comes from page 350 of Szymon
Wizenthal's book Justice Not Vengeance. But what he pretends
to urge here, namely that doubters "should be made to remove with
their fingers some of the grass growing around the crematoria", is
precisely what the Revisionists have been wanting to do all along,
and what Wizenthal has made sure is forbidden for all time with the
help of the law he thought up and forced into effect in Austria.

And the so-called Revisionists, who - like I
myself - tend to be condemned and sentenced as Nazi criminals for
presuming to ask for material evidence, have not even demanded such
an elaborate procedure as Wizenthal, namely that any doubter should
have the right to dig around on his own initiative. We Revisionists
would have been perfectly content for a court-appointed subject
expert to clear this matter up in a one-time investigation such as is
the absolute requirement in any other criminal case in the world,
such as has been neglected to date in the single solitary case of the
"Holocaust", and such as is to be thwarted for all time on
Wizenthal's initiative.

In my book Freispruch für Hitler? I
urged that this kind of material evidence should be obtained in
order to show that there were no mass murders in gas chambers; in
order to prevent the present volume from being banned as well, I
shall make the reverse of my original demand to the Austrian
and German justice systems:

I urge you to carry out the scientific
investigations of the "Holocaust" and of other genocidal measures
against the Jews in the Third Reich - investigations which have been
neglected to date yet which are standard anywhere in the world in any
criminal case - and to do so in

220

order to finally base your theories (which
to date have only been enforced by criminal legislation, nothing
more) on the same scientifically thorough foundation that is
guaranteed in every other criminal case in Germany and which Adolf
Hitler granted in exemplary fashion to the Polish officers murdered
by the Bolshevists in Katyn.

In the quotation on p. (JNV p. 350)
Wizenthal at least concedes that the "millions of victims" about
which he has talked for 50 years were by no means removed without a
trace by the "exhumation units" he propagates elsewhere. He claims
that the skeletons can be seen lying at the bottom of the ponds to
this day.

But it would be much more important to
conduct a simple archeological excavation in the football-field-sized
death camp of Treblinka to see whether countless 10-meter-deep and
20-meter-wide pits really were dug there in order to serve at least
temporarily as graves for a million bodies. That would go much father
towards removing our "criminal doubts" than the suggestion of Szymon
Wizenthal who, in the manner of a "kind old man" giving a tour
of a haunted house, would have us look at a skeleton at the bottom of
a pond - a skeleton which has kindly taken the trouble, for the sake
of our viewing pleasure. to keep itself clear of sediment for half a
century.

Wizenthal casts doubt upon witnesses for
gas chambers:
Höttl - a "bluffer" who fooled the Americans.

In his book Wizenthal twice makes use of the
former SS-Obersiurmbann/uhrer Wilhelm Höttl - once as
credible witness for the six million Jews murdered in the Third Reich
(JNV p. 69) and, evidently hoping that no-one really reads his book,
a second time on p. 46, where he paints him as a liar who
"...had conned the Americans into believing that they still had
the same agents in the Balkans as when they were officers of the Nazi
intelligence service. This was subsequently revealed as a huge
bluff..."

If Wizenthal portrays HOW, on p. 46, as a
bluffer who deceives and cons the Americans, he forgets that this
also makes HOttl useless as key witness for the murder of six million
Jews with gas - the role he had assumed at the International Military
Tribunal in Nuremberg.

If for no other reason than the fact that
Nazi hunter Szymon discredits the key testimony against Eichmann by
attributing it to a "bluffer", it seems reasonable to demand a
reopening of the Eichmann case and of all other

221

cases in which convictions were handed down
by the IMT on the basis of Höttl's affidavit.

Hottl, the key incriminating witness of
Nuremberg, today enjoys a peaceful retirement in Altaussee, and no
doubt he has his "efforts on behalf of the gas chambers" to thank for
this happy state of affairs. Wizenthal would be ill advised to
continue relying too heavily on Hottl's susceptibility to extortion:
Hottl holds the longer end of the stick, and if he should happen to
have made provisions in the form of notarized affidavits, reposited
in safe places, this would mean more than any life insurance.

So Wizenthal the Just will have to continue
foregoing any persecution of the man who was subordinate to Eichmann
and across whose desk passed all the death sentences in Budapest. But
it would also be wise of Wizenthal to go easy on attacks such as he
launches against Hottl in JNV, the work of his old age. The entire
foundations of the "Holocaust" could be shaken if Hottl were to turn
"denier".

Wizenthal quotes testimony of tortured
witnesses.

Wizenthal bases part of the work of his
declining years on the testimony of SS-General Otto Ohlendorf,
testimony which was extorted with torture and which Ohlendorf later
retracted:

"`Some squad leaders', Ohlendorf later
explained at his trial, `demanded that the victims lie flat on the
ground, to be killed by a bullet in the back of their necks. But this
method did not meet with my approval.' Questioned why he did not
'approve 'l Ohlendorf stated factually: Because it was too much of a
psychological stress for the victims and for the
executioners.'" (JNV p. 58.)

Richard Harwood, the author of the
publication Did Six Million Really Die? (Toronto: Samisdat
Publishers Ltd.), described Otto Ohlendorfs actual testimony as
follows:

"Ohlendorf was one of those subjected
to the torture described earlier... Ohlendorf did not come to trial
until 1948, long after the main Nuremberg Trial, and by that time he
was insisting that his earlier statement had been extracted from him
under torture." (p. 13.)

Wizenthal likes comprehensive confessions
because they fit his black-and-white scheme of things. He likes to
quote them, too. But he has no use for retractions and charges of
torture.

222

Industrial-style mass
murder.

In his chapter "The Pro", Wizenthal suddenly
remembers that the allegation of industrial-style mass murder must
not be missing in the context of the murder of Jews in the Third
Reich. And so the text that follows is rife with imaginative
technical jargon which is taken in part from the terminology of trade
and industry and which the court-appointed expert Prof. Jagschitz,
after five years of research in all sorts of sources, was unable to
document.

"A method had therefore to be found
that would be more cost-effective and avoid stressing the
executioners. The appropriate innovation was supplied by
medical specialists. In euthanasia experiments at special
institutions such as Hartheim, Hadamar and Sonnenberg, the use of gas
had proved effective. It ensured a substantially bigger yield of
corpses at reduced costs, and it was less of a stress on doctors and
nurses than other forms of killing.

"Meanwhile the extension of the death
market required a transition from a few small stationary gas chambers
to mobile units which could be employed everywhere. Possibly even
before ready-to-pour concrete was invented, the German inventive
genius hit upon the production of ready-tobury corpses [..]
mixing can be done not only at one stationary spot but anywhere;
travel time is not additional to mixing time; and the concrete can be
tipped straight into the pit where it belongs The invention o/' the
gas truck represents a similarly elegant solution to the problem of
mobile extermination of Jews [..]

"The facility of rapid unloading was
another important requirement. A working party specially charged with
this problem came up with the idea of fitting a `rapid discharge
device' [..] `Since October 1941, for instance,' Just wrote,
`97,000 were processed in the three trucks in use without any faults
appearing in the vehicles.'" (JNV p. 58-60.)

These contortions of Wizenthal's, aimed
at substantiating the "industrial-style mass murder" with
technical-sounding vocabulary borrowed from industrial production and
commercial expense-vs.-profit calculations, have the one drawback
that the "documents" which the old fraud relies on are evidently not
presentable:

In the great Auschwitz Report by Prof.
Jagschitz not even one of these "documents" was found, even though
any one of them that could stand up to a forensic examination would
represent that core evidence for the existence of "gas chambers" that
has been lacking for so long.

223

The lie of "exhhumation
units".

One great problem for the Wizenthal
Syndicate was the fact that the mass graves that have been found in
the East to date have almost exclusively contained the bodies of
victims of the Jewish-Bolshevist armies, and no victims of National
Socialist Germany. To keep these grave finds from upsetting the view
of history being taught today, Wizenthal invented the so-called
"exhumation units":

"Ever since Stalingrad lite German
armies had been in retreat, and they had to expect that the pursuing
Red Army would come across the countless pits of corpses which marked
German progress through the Ukraine and Belorussia." (JNV
p. 164. )

The embarrassment which Wizenthal alleges
"the Germans" felt towards the Red Army surely never existed: for
even if all claims of murder committed by the Third Reich were true,
the extent of the Soviet crimes (see p. ) would still exceed them by
a factor of ten in quantity alone. Any embarrassment of the Third
Reich towards the Soviet Union where mass murder was concerned would
truly make less than no sense.

Wizenthal continues:

"A special unit was therefore set up,
designated `1005 ; whose task it was to find the largest mass graves,
dig up the bodies again and burn them." (JNV p. 164.)

No matter how inane such claims may be, the
stooges of the American Imperium and the Allied occupation power -
namely, the German leftists - believe them without a second thought.

Even if the German Wehrmacht had been under
the lunatic order to survey and record topographically the locations
of any given "mass graves" - in the vastness of Russia, without the
aid of land surveyors and equipment and without accurate maps, they
could not even have made a precise determination of their own
location. However, no-one seems to dare to claim that any such order
actually existed. Further, it would seem nonsensical to try to draw
up an index of such buried victims rather than to do the only thing
that is in fact done in such cases, as Stalin showed us: namely, to
let grass grow over the matter.

But what is most impossible about all
this is the notion of a single special unit assigned to searching the
more than two million square kilometers held by the German troops in
the East for graves which would have already been covered over by
one, two or even three years'

224

growth of turf and which would have been
in no way marked to be readily recognizable. Devices with which
to detect buried bodies have yet to be invented - and so we may
confidently file the "exhumation units" away as just one more
invention by Wizenthal & Co. Quite aside from the fact that
amidst the chaos of retreat behind the crumbling front, anyone who
had ordered the provision of even one truck, even one barrel of
gasoline or even one fit soldier for such a nonsensical undertaking
would have been immediately relieved of command by Hitler.

If, as Wizenthal claims, the existence of
the "gas chambers" was largely known to the Germans and the Allies
the entire time anyhow (cf. JNV p. 230), and if one even
alleges that Hitler had openly threatened the Allies with the
destruction of the Jews (cf. Jagschitz Report, Hv 5720/90), what
would have been the point of exhuming the mass graves? Further, how
should the bodies have been burned - without a crematorium, in a
partly treeless region far from roads or rail? If one had used fuel
for this purpose, this lunatic project would have taken more gasoline
than was available to the entire Eastern front struggling desperately
for Germany's preservation in those days!

Wizenthal wants "daily rate" for
Auschwitz increased.

It's enough to make one catch one's breath
to learn that Wizenthal wants Germany's and Austria's restitution
payments based on a daily rate. We read: "...the Austrian republic
never dreamed of paying the Nazi victims anything like what the
Federal Republic was paying them. Initially Austria's compensation
payment was all of five Schillings per day in Auschwitz; only after
vigorous protests did the country draw level with the Germans who had
been paying five Deutschmarks from the start. " (JNV p. 323. )

One must really wonder whether Wizenthal
himself believes in the "gas chambers": after all, according to what
is taught in schools (and by Wizenthal as well), 90% of the arrivals
were "selected" at "the ramp" and sent into the "gas chambers" on the
very day of their arrival.

What would be the point of restitution based
on a daily rate if the day of arrival and the duration of the stay
were one and the same, in other words if the surviving kin of the
victims each received no more than five Deutschmarks for the loss of
their loved ones?

"In fact there was only one Soviet
crime which approximates in its `quality' to the quality of the Nazi
murders: the murder of 4000 Polish officers at Katyn. I have
therefore worked all my life to clear up this murder too."
(JNV p. 159.)

That Wizenthal has ever done anything at all
to "clear up" the Soviet crimes in Katyn is a filthy lie.

When I was arraigned in court in May 1992
for my book Freispruch für Hitler? (and incidentally,
Wizenthal's initiative in these proceedings has been established), I
was charged not only for disputing the "gas chambers" but also for
disputing that the Germans had shot those Polish officers in the
forest of Katyn.

In other words, Wizenthal, who proposed and
forced the passing of a bill in the Austrian Parliament with the
intent to silence me, and who commented on the outcome of my trial
"with satisfaction", would have had a marvellous opportunity to vent
some of his efforts to clear up the Katyn case. This would have been
all the easier since Gorbachev, independently of Wizenthal's alleged
efforts, had already publicly admitted the Soviet Union's guilt in
this matter in 1988.

For the record, let me also mention here
that the Katyn case was never in need of "clearing up" by Wizenthal.
It was Adolf Hitler himself who ordered this case investigated by a
team of scientists, with the painstaking care of that time which the
Wizenthal Syndicate denies the gas chamber allegations to this day.
The case was thus already cleared up in 1942.

On the contrary: if it were not for the
victorious Allies' version of justice, in whose service the
Restitution Fraud Wizenthal has been able to act for 50 years,
the scientific proof furnished by the Third Reich would not have been
swept under the carpet for purposes of anti-German propaganda, and
replaced with deliberate lies.

But the truly monstrous aspect of
Wizenthal's above-mentioned pearl of wisdom is a different one:

Wizenthal exploits the fact that "denying
the 'gas chambers' and other Nazi crimes" carries a penalty in
Austria of five to ten years in prison, while denying Soviet mass
crimes is not considered a crime and goes unpunished. And so he
denies them: in a study the University of Vienna (cf. p.) has laid

226

some 40 million murders to the Soviet
Union's charge. Of these 40 million victims, 39,996,000 would have to
have been butchered so gently and kindly that these murders differed
materially from the execution of 4,000 Polish officers in Katyn and
the "industrial-style mass murder" of the Third Reich.

The author Robert Conquest gives us the
details of these events in the book The Harvest of Sorrow:

"A quarter of the rural population,
men, women and children, lay dead or dying, the rest in various
stages of debilitation with no strength to bury their families or
neighbours. At the same time... well fed squads of police or party
officials supervised the victims. This was the climax of the
revolution from above', as Stalin put it, in which he and his
associates crushed two elements seen as irremediably hostile to the
regime: the peasantry of the USSR as a whole, and the Ukrainian
nation." (p. 3.)

Lew Kopelew, the Jewish Bolshevik who
participated in the murder of seven million Ukrainians in the
1932-1933 winter of planned starvation, and who was later awarded the
German Book Trade's Peace Prize, describes his complicity thus:

"Mv involvement in that fateful 'grain
delivery campaign' is unforgivable and inexcusable. I can never atone
for it. I can only try to live honestly with it." (Rullmann,
p. 11.)

Compared to the "mass murders" that are
imputed to the Third Reich, the attempted extermination of the
Ukrainians is a crime of much more grave and unique quality: not
because the victims were non-Jews (Ukrainians) instead of Jews. As
far as I am concerned, a victim of one nationality is worth no less
than a victim of another. But because the Bolsheviks murdered fully
one million more Ukrainians than the Bolsheviks and Jews have accused
Germany of murdering, and because the murder of the Ukrainians
involved a death that took weeks or even months, before the eyes and
armin-arm with the victims' closest kin, this one genocide of the
Ukrainians is unique and in no way comparable with the alleged murder
of Jews. By the fact that Wizenthal dares, in German lands where
millions of German women and children, our mothers and grandmothers,
were violated and hundreds of thousands were raped to death on the
instigation and urging of the Jewish-Bolshevist criminal Ilya
Ehrenburg, to compare the crime of Katyn (which after all was
restricted to quick and relatively painless executions) and the
alleged gassing of Jews (which would have been strictly a mass
killing per se) with the million-fold brutal Jewish-Bolshevist
mass sex murder - by that fact alone, this monster in human form has
forfeited all rights to residence, income and citizenship in Austria
and Germany.

227

The tale of the villas.

"The old-style murderer was an outcast
who, as a rule, had to cower in some hiding place and only rarely was
able to enjoy the fruits of his crime. The murderers of the Nazi
period, however, were living with false papers among their own kind
in villas on the coasts of Latin America, enjoying the wealth of
their victims. " (JNV p. 160. )

This is one more of the lies Wizenthal
spouts in his opus Justice Not Vengeance. Not a single one of
the victims which he describes as "typical cases" in the book at
issue actually lived in villas on the coasts of Latin America, and
not one was open to the charge of having profited from wealth stolen
from Jewish victims. On the contrary, Wizenthal even describes how
they all worked (for example, Eichmann, as factory worker) to support
their families.

But no-one bothers to examine Wizenthal's
lies. No-one demands that the hatemonger with the anti-German mission
should prove the horror stories he disseminates in the intent
to propagandistically portray the German people and their national
character in a negative light.

Mother abused once again.

I have already pointed out elsewhere that
Wizenthal falsified not only his own ethnicity, but also that of his
mother, changing them from the actual Jewish to that of the alleged
criminal nation, German. For the sake of financial gain. I have also
pointed out that in an affidavit Wizenthal reported that his mother
died in the Lemberg hospital, but that in other tales he claims she
died on her way to the gas chamber.

On p. 161 of the work of his senility, he
taxes the poor old lady's resilience yet again:

"'Herr Minister,' I said, interrupting
him, `the murderers of my mother and the murderers of many of my
relatives and friends have not been found yet. I don't even know
their names. (It must be difficult enough to remember all the
names of the 100 relatives Wizenthal arrogates to himself; how much
more difficult to recall the names of the 100 murderers.) I am
addressing the Minister of Justice, not the Finance Minister. I
recognize the Federal Republic's financial efforts, but surely they
cannot be a substitute for efforts to achieve justice. "
(JNV p. 161. )

228

So that is how this audacious fraud presumes
to deal with a West German Minister of Justice. And by his own
admission, no less.

Now it would be time to find out which
version of his mother's death Wizenthal continues to maintain
officially. For the second, false version, however, Wizenthal should
be tried and sentenced in court like any other criminal.

This is the first sentence of Wizenthal's
with which I concur wholeheartedly. But it is his idea of justice
that is limited by the ghetto of Germany's and her former allies'
"guilt".

If Wizenthal's justice were not limited, he
would first demand the punishment of the murderers of Jews on Soviet
and Polish soil. The number of Jew-murderers running around free
there is considerable. But first he would need to break down the
walls within which he has imprisoned his alleged sense of justice
with racial criteria, namely "Jewish victims only", and to apply his
abilities to avenging crimes committed by others as well. I would not
go so far as to expect him to devote his energies to clearing up the
atrocities committed by the Jewish army today in the Israeli-occupied
territories of Palestine. I would not expect him to have an open ear
and a helping hand for all the other oppressed peoples in the world,
and I would not even expect him to turn himself in for the abduction
of Eichmann and the attempted assassination of Alois Brunner. All I
want is that he should evaluate and combat the crimes committed in
those earlier years at the places where he stayed, fairly and by
objective criteria, and without an eye to race or religion.

How many murderers of gypsies, who were
allegedly killed at the same time, in the same place, in the same way
and by the same power, has Wizenthal ever hunted and brought to
trial?

What steps has he taken or initiated against
those murderers who, after liberation, butchered German Communist
inmates for the sake of their German ethnicity, in full view of
Wizenthal himself and in the presence of his troop of witnesses?

What has Wizenthal done, or caused to be
done, about those criminals who at that same time murdered or
tortured to death thousands of young men from the SS guards
throughout Germany, without trials and without any questions
regarding their guilt or involvement?

229

And what has Wizenthal done about the
excesses committed by his criminal concentration camp buddies who
spent weeks in the vicinity of Mauthausen, murdering, looting and
raping, without any examining magistrate ever having devoted so much
as a minute to even one of these crimes?

Wizenthal, the Jew blinded by his
Old-Testament-style hate, has done nothing about any of this.

Rather, he has selected his victims and his
culprits according to racial criteria and has hunted them down with
gangster methods.

He has sowed. Woe to them who will one day
have to reap this crop!

Wizenthal and the state under the rule of
law. Contacts with groups willing to commit murder.

Wizenthal's criminal tendencies and his
nonexistent sense of justice repeatedly tempt him to describe
situations where he acts much like a Mafia killer: he brags that,
time and again, murderers who come to his office - not infrequently
with the murder weapon already on their person - ask his advice on
killing German or Austrian citizens.

Instead of contacting the police and having
these people arrested for intent to commit murder - as any
law-abiding citizen would do in such a case - he dickers and haggles
with the criminals to persuade them of the advantage of his own
hunting methods. In the foreword to the work of his senility this
reads as follows:

"...young Jewish commandos or former
partisans who tried to win him over for secret retributory action:
`Give us the names, give us the addresses And we'll do it ourselves.'
But Wiesenthal spent hours making them see reason. To him the
decisive victory over the ancient principle of `an eye for an eye, a
tooth for a tooth', was in the victim's readiness to transfer his
need for retribution to society, to subject it to certain rules.. and
to respect their judgement (i.e. the judgement of the courts of law)
absolutely." (JNV p. 14. )

When I recount in this book the mysterious
deaths of those Wizenthal Victims whom the Nazi hunter could not take
to court or whose testimony somehow didn't fit his bill, and when I
cannot help but suspect that he or his syndicate were behind the
elimination of the persons in question, then these kinds of
statements from the horse's mouth only serve to prove his contacts to
persons or groups who are ready to commit murder and would only need
a sign from Wizenthal to set them off. Even if he was not the one to
order the

230

countless murders, or even an accessory to
them, the fact that he neglected to turn potential murderers over to
the proper authorities means that he facilitated the murders
described, and must bear a share of the blame.

The term "need for retribution", which
reveals much about Wizenthal's sick psyche and which he uses as
stand-in for "justice" here, will be dealt with in another chapter
(see "Sadism").

But back to Wizenthal's lies. Wizenthal, who
has his personal propagandist Peter Michael Lingens claim here that
Wizenthal respects thejudgement of the
courts, in actual fact scorns and derides the German andAustrian justice systems in almost every
chapter in his book. The Galiciancrook
does so with particular openness in his chapter 32, which he has
theaudacity to title "The
Infestation of the Judiciary". In other words, Wizenthal
recognized and recognizes verdicts handed down by German courts
ifand only if these verdicts were
convictions: if the judges were willing toaccept the professional Jewish witnesses
offered by Wizenthal and hissyndicate
at face value, did not ask them any inconvenient questions,
andtook their imaginative and
contradictory testimony as the basis for theirconvictions.

The tale of the imprisoned
guards.

On p. 29 Wizenthal blathers as
follows:

Although our guards had fled or been
taken prisoner, we were still livingin the camp and were still watching
people die." (JNh p. 29.)

If, prior to liberation, the inmates were
dying due to the "gas chambers" and the alleged violence of the SS,
as Wizenthal has claimed for professional reasons his entire life
long, then why - surely even the dumbest German leftwing intellectual
would ask - did the dying continue in the presence of the Americans?
Did they stock the "gas chambers" as well? Or might it perhaps really
have been the disease typhus (as stubborn SS-men and mentally
deranged "right-wing radicals" claim) that rang up the enormous death
toll in the concentration camps?

The main objection, however, which comes to
mind here is that in actual fact the guards of Mauthausen and
elsewhere had in many cases already been tortured and murdered by the
inmates and the Allied liberators, right then and there upon
liberation, and before the eyes of the liberated inmates.

In Dachau alone, for example (see
photos pp. ff.), a total of 500 SS-men, among them members of the
Waffen-SS who were on convalescent leave, had been mowed down with
machine guns. Those who survived the first

231

round of bullets were handed over to
Wizenthal's comrades, who proceeded to torture them to death with
shovels.

It's not surprising that Wizenthal (whose
own role in these events, by the way, has not been investigated yet)
would rather sweep all this under the carpet.

Wizenthal denies advocating "collective
guilt". Instead, he speaks of the "collective responsibility" of the
German "culprit nation".

Military aggression by a state of the
democratic type against some other state is normally, of necessity,
preceded by propaganda. Much more than dictatorships and totalitarian
systems, regimes of "Western democracy" style need to
propagandistically attune their population to readiness for potential
economic or even military action.

For this reason I have been concerned to
observe, for many years now, that the United States of America engage
in hateful and perpetual propaganda of a hostile nature against one
single specific one of its allies.

This propaganda takes place on the lower
levels, so to speak - not on the polished diplomatic parquet. Those
who carry it out are the American movie industry, the comics trade,
the publishing industry, the press, and the "Holocaust" activities of
the "Simon Wiesenthal Foundation" in the United States.

Political propaganda is merchandise whose
manufacture costs the customer dearly: for its consumers choke it
down only unwillingly, like bitter medicine. This business is not one
for profit, only for investment. The tune-in figures for politically
tendentious films are known to be unprofitable.

When a power such as the United States is
nonetheless willing to bear the costs of such propaganda, as well as
to run the risks involved (since it would be very easy to go too far
and alert the victim), then this shows that fundamental strategic
considerations have been made.

As early as 1984, in issue 22 of the
magazine HALT, I had already spoken out about the phenomenon
of anti-German propaganda in America, and tried to capture the
essence of this problematic topic in the essay's title:

"Tell rne your propaganda, and I will
tell you what you plan for me."

Over the years an observer could readily see
that nations such as the Soviet Union and her Communist allies were
by no means attacked more viciously by this propaganda than the
United States' ally, the Federal Republic of Germany. Only recently
have the beginnings of anti-Japanese propaganda become noticeable in
the States, and this propaganda might yet increase to similar
intensity as that which has been carried on against America's ally
Germany ever since she was established as the Federal Republic.

242

It was this hidden intellectual aggression,
waged on the lower levels of entertainment by means of the covert
disqualification of the German people, that allowed Szymon Wizenthal
to find the niche that was tailor-made to his activities, where he
had no competition to fear and where he could continue to find his
possibly physical satisfaction until he reached extreme old age.

A dubious sort of remembrance. The cloth
from which incitement is cut.

The anti-German "Holocaust" propaganda,
"made in the USA", has recently increased to such a degree that even
the German daily papers could not avoid commenting on these politics
of hate.

The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
for example, in its issue of August 4, 1992, wrote the following
in an article titled "A dubious sort of remembrance":

"This year Holocaust-museums were
opened in eleven major American cities...

"In numerous individual American
states, Jewish lobby groups have successfully pushed for the
inclusion of Holocaust studies in high school curricula..

"Within a period of three months, tire
American television company ABC broadcast three one-hour programs,
during prime time, about 'hostility to foreigners' in Germany. It did
not hesitate to supplement its coverage of the discharge of the
German Minister of Defense Stoltenberg with pictures of night-time
National Socialist march-ups..." (FAZ, August 4,
1992.)

The article's author, Günter Gillesen,
reported with discouragement that Germany was to contribute four
million Deutschmarks to one of these "Holocaust" museums. This museum
contains a list of "the Just" - meaning people who helped the Jews
during their persecution. According to Gillesen, German "escape
helpers" etc. are not allowed to appear in this Germanfunded museum.
And Gillesen continues:

"Nothing can come of it like this.. If
it is supposed to be the purpose of such contributions... then the
path must be permitted to lead, via the dead, to understanding among
the living. If this is to be ruled out from the start, it would be
better./or the Federal Republic of Germany to work on this task with
other Jewish partners."

243

Incitement just like before America
joined the war.

Meanwhile, the incitement in the USA against
her German ally has taken on proportions that can only be compared to
the war propaganda with which Washington DC prepared for its entry
into World War Two.

"The figure of the 'ugly German' has
long been part of the stock-in-trade of political opinion-making in
America." (Die Welt, October 14, 1992, p. 13.)

The same article continues:

"By now the Americans also imitate
this questionable example, for they too need a scapegoat which they
can make at least partly responsible for the consequences of their
unsuccessful economic policies."

The agitation carried on in full view of the
rest of the world against democratic Germany - servile, paying
protection money, vulnerable to extortion - is tantamount to the
intellectual preparation for war against an enemy nation. And all
this only in order to distract from domestic economic difficulties?
The accusations against National Socialism and the Germany of those
days are truly in need of re-thinking.

"The image of the ugly German is
reproduced a thousandfold. Hackneyed Hollywood flicks portray German
Wehrmacht officers with all conceivable brutality and
bestiality."

The German press, therefore, is hurriedly
catching up on the basic knowledge which "right-wing extremists" have
possessed from the start.

The billyclub of propaganda is dug
up.

1992 was the year of American propaganda.
For the first time since 1945 the Imperium dug up the "propaganda
billyclub" and brandished it openly against Germany, before the
entire world. In the last days of November, after three Turkish women
had died in an arson fire, the Western media reported about the
"outrage" felt by the American and Israeli "publics".

That this in fact refers not to two, but to
one and the same "public" is something I want to add in passing. Ever
since the Imperium began to use "democracy" as a weapon against the
people, the term "public" has been frequently misused.

The "public outrage" in Israel and the
United States is consistently an "outrage" decreed by the press, and
the populace often takes only a lukewarm part in it. In the face of
13,000 Palestinian political prisoners detained

244

in concentration camps, of an average of
three teenaged demonstrators being executed each day in Israel, or of
hundreds of innocent victims of race riots in Los Angeles, how should
any Israeli or American citizen, even if he is reasonably
intelligent, feel real outrage at a political system where not even
remotely comparable excesses of violence have ever yet been reached?
And how, in the face of such a global context, is anyone to
sympathize with "boycott measures" as they are being demanded these
days against such a Germany? Quite irrespective of the fact that
these two-faced demands for the world-wide boycott of Germany are
being made by precisely the same forces who themselves refuse to
admit anyone not of their own race into their country, and who impose
the obligation on Germany to take in 80% of all of Europe's "asylum
seekers", economic refugees and immigrants (CNN, November 30, 1992,
9:00pm Central European Time). This is a case of the culprit stepping
into the prosecutor's shoes and accusing the victim.

The current, hypocritical prattle about
boycotts is also strikingly reminiscent of the actions of the Jewish
organizations who called for a boycott of Germany in March 1933:

"The whole of Israel throughout the
world is uniting in declaring an economic and financial war on
Germany .... Representative Jewish organizations in the European
capitals are understood to be making representations to their various
Governments to use influence ...." (London Daily Express,
"Judea Declares War on Germany!", March 24,
1933.)

To keep the flame of Germanophobia,
flickering somewhat weakly despite all these efforts, alive and well
at least in the United States and in Israel - that is the task of the
Jewish-American Imperium's present-day preventive propaganda. For
half a century its chief supplier of fuel has been Szymon Wizenthal.
The facsimile reprint on p. shall give you, my reader, a glimpse of
the Wizenthalian orgies of hate against the credulous German people:

A mailing of the US-based Wiesenthal Center
actually claims that Germany was supplying the Iraqis with gas
containing Zyklon B, intended for use in the Iraqi gas chambers which
were allegedly being built there for purposes of killing off the
Jews!

But first, let us turn to Wizenthal's book
Justice Nol vengeance to examine it for some examples of
generalizing anti-German outbursts which clearly constitute
incitement under the relevant laws in Austria and Germany:

1. "In eastern Europe there was
scarcely a spot where the Germans had not committed some
crime." (.JNV p. 159. )

245

2. "For the first time in my life I
saw what enormous cowards these people were;... We didn't feel like
talking to these people, but we realized one thing: the Germans and
the Austrians would not simply acknowledge with shame what we had
experienced -they would dispute it." (JNV p. 30. )

3. "The Germans are needed against the
Russians. Good Germans alone are too few." (JNV p.
40.)

4. "On the soil of Germany, which
bears the responsibility for Auschwitz, it seems to me entirely
legitimate to protect the survivors and their children against such
slaps by penal legislation." (JNV p. 3 32. )

5. "Hitler not only murdered millions
of Jews and millions of his adversaries, he also morally destroyed
millions of Germans and millions of Austrians - what's more, for
generations to come. To belong to the victims is terrible - but it is
even more terrible to belong to the victim-makers." (JNV
p. 357.)

6. "There is no point in minimizing
guilt in order to make it easier for sons and daughters to bear the
failure of their fathers and grandfathers, their mothers and
grandmothers. The entire guilt must be patent - only thus can the
entire guilt be understood." (JNV p. 3 5 7-8. )

After this flood of vile outbursts, all of
which clearly express Wizenthal's hatred of all things German, his
contempt for the German national character, and his efforts on behalf
of the collective responsibility of the grandchildren's generation,
we need no further evidence for his espousal of the theory of
collective guilt.

If Wizenthal has his ex-secretary Lingens
publish assurances in various newspapers, claiming that Wizenthal
does not attribute the crimes of the Third Reich to the German
"national character", this weak denial can surely be credited only by
people who have not read his books and their wealth of passages
demonstrating his hatred and incitement against the German people.

Wizenthal's repeated comment that there is
no such thing as collective guilt is also in crass contradiction of
his heated anti-German tirades in which he frequently equates the
German people with National Socialism, and must therefore be rejected
as nothing more than a cover.

"Collective
responsibility".

In attempting to nonetheless deny his
practice of assigning collective guilt to the German people,
Wizenthal is trying to square the circle: and so

246

he merely substitutes the expression
"collective responsibility" for "collective guilt".

It sounds like this:

"That is why I was pleased to find
that the government of East Germany has recently begun to show a
willingness to acknowledge the responsibility that is laid on the
Germans as a whole." (NZ, March 10, 1989.)

How can there be collective responsibility
without collective guilt? Responsibility borne by the innocent?

Wizenthal fails to see that to make an
innocent person responsible for something represents the high point
of injustice. Collective responsibility for innocent people - that is
even worse than collective guilt!

To put it differently: our Galician crook
has tailor-made a sort of mercantile philosophy for himself which
states that the innocent and the descendants of innocent German
people, as well as the innocent descendants of guilty German people,
can continue to be held responsible - not in legal terms, but in
moral and thus in financial terms.

Here again, his blind faith that no-one will
take the trouble to actually examine his mediocre, vulgar and
obnoxious books a little more closely, proves to be his own undoing:
for on p. 215 of JNVwe catch this compulsive hatemonger exposing what
he really thinks and knows of the consequences of collective
responsibility:

"Hate and deep resentment may arise
when a whole nation or a community is held collectively responsible
for the crimes and the sins of an individual or a minority, when
responsibility is indiscriminately attributed to all people of the
same nationality, religion or race. Vindictive hate is blind to the
good, the beautiful and the noble in another people or in another
nation. Such hate sees only what is bad and criminal."
(JNV p. 215.)

Of course these liberating words which,
however, clearly expose Wizenthal's intentions once and for all, are
not intended for the benefit of the German people, but for the
Polish, and they occur in the chapter dedicated to the latter. I
shall return to this point later to examine Wizenthal's strange
attempts to curry favor with the people who may well have been the
most bloody anti-Semites in German concentration camp history.

So Wizenthal is very well aware - and
once again he has convicted himself when he says that hate arises
when an entire nation is collectively held responsible for the crimes
of an individual or minority...

But the following quotation shows what
Wizenthal really thinks of the German people and their role in
history:

247

"Just imagine that someone decided to
exterminate all Germans, justifying this with the events of the past
two centuries: the Germans started two world wars, they murdered
millions of human beings, they aimed at world rule." (JNV
p. 162. )

I admit that Wizenthal does not in this
quotation urge the extermination of the German people. But even this
toying with the idea of a genocide of the Germans is an incredible
insult to the entire German people in Austria and Germany when one
knows that the Jew Henry Morgenthau, a Minister under the American
President Roosevelt, was permitted to draw up the so-called
Morgenthau Plan which aimed not only at the political but also at the
physical destruction of the German people through the destruction of
their living conditions and was not finally discarded until 1948 -
and then only for fear of Stalin. The present-day destruction of the
closed German settlement area by forcibly imposed immigration, and
the ethnic destruction of the German people which may be expected as
a consequence, may well be a modified continuation of the planned
genocide of 1945. Should we generalize, like Wizenthal, therefore,
and call the participation of international Jewish organizations, the
world-encompassing campaign by the Jewish-steered media, and the
support given to this plan by Jewish personalities and institutions
in Austria, a "Jewish crime"?

The fact that the "Documentary Archives of
the Austrian Resistance" ("DOW") defends the Morgenthau Plan to this
day, and that in view of modern-day Germany's economic strength they
condemn that this Plan was abandoned, prompted me as early as August
12, 1991 to bring charges, via my attorney Dr. Schaller, against the
Chief of the DOW, Wizenthal's confidant Dr. Wolfgang Neugebauer. In
1992 this institution - committed to the American secret service,
just like Wizenthal (cf. Wagnleitner, CocaColonisationlSPO) -
justified its agreement to with panned genocide by citing the
necessity of altering the German national character. All of
Wizenthal's and his cheerleader P. M. Lingens' protestations that
they do not impute anything evil to the German national character
must henceforth be regarded as the defensive waffling of two Jews,
one of which - Wizenthal - is criminal beyond the shadow of a doubt.

The monstrous nature of the above
quotation (cf p. ; JNV p. 162) is that Wizenthal does
not content himself with ascribing the blame for the two world wars
to Adolf Hitler or the Emperors Wilhelm II and Franz Joseph 1, but
that he ascribes it to the whole of the German people, to each and
every one of our ancestors from three to five generations back, and
calls them responsible for an alleged crime that claimed 50 million
lives.

248

It has been bizarre enough so far to listen
to the accounts of semi-official historiography and to hear that the
crime of our century began with the appearance of the "sinister and
evil National Socialists". Any doubts about Germany's guilt and any
timid reference to the denial of our right to self-determination was
avenged with malice or criminal charges. However, the fact that
Wizenthal now goes so far as to also take the part of those
criminals, in the context of the First World War, who destroyed the
Habsburg Monarchy and the empire of the Hohenzollern, who robbed the
German nation of territory along all its borders, deprived it of its
right to self-determination and plunged it into a deliberately
instigated chaos of starvation - with food rations below the level of
those in Hitler's concentration camps - clearly exposes Wizenthal's
mission on behalf of the American Imperium. By openly making the
German people collectively responsible not only for the Second but
also for the First World War, he reveals that he sees Austria's
history, not with the eyes of the son of an Austrian soldier of the
First World War as he claims to be, but with the eyes of an American
agent. For surely not even a forger of history as masterful as
Wizenthal will be able to make the notion palatable to us that it was
"the Germans" who shot the heir apparent Arch-Duke Franz Ferdinand in
Sarajevo!

In his forged application for restitution as
"ethnic German expellee" Wizenthal makes reference not only to the
two years he spent attending a Viennese public school but also states
that his father, an Austrian soldier, died in the First World War.
One should think, therefore, that he would at least hesitate to sully
his own father's memory with allegations of collective guilt and
responsibility for the 50 million dead of the First World War.

In light of the lunatic national borders
which the First World War and American arrogance created in Europe
and which we have to thank for the present-day horrors of the Balkan
wars at our very doorstep, anyone who places the blame for the First
World War on the German people rather than squarely on the shoulders
of the Entente powers is a forger of history who should not be
permitted to enjoy residence or the benefits of citizenship either in
Austria or in Germany.

To demonstrate the gruesome cynicism of the
Wizenthal quotation here at issue (cf. p. ), please permit me just
this once to consider the German people as equal to the Jewish and to
rephrase Wizenthal's statement, switching the terms "German" and
"Jewish". The result sounds like this:

"Just imagine that someone decided to
exterminate all Jews, justifying this with the events of the past two
centuries: the Jews started two world wars, they murdered millions of
human beings, they aimed at

249

world rule. There would in fact be as
many reasons for being antiJewish as there are for being
anti-German."

I have a hard time imagining better proof of
Wizenthal's intent to incite race hatred by the passage discussed
here than the test performed by switching the nationalities.

And this is a warning to all those who made
Wizenthal possible: namely, that the injustice of generalization and
the charge of collective guilt against "the Germans" may one day be
used as a lethal weapon against the Jewish people as well, merely by
reversal and the same apparent logic.

In this respect, the Morgenthau Plan is
like the Jews' Wannsee Conference. With the one difference that the
Wannsee protocol is a forgery, whereas the Morgenthau Plan stands up
to examination even by the Federal Criminal Police in Wiesbaden.

How dangerous Wizenthal's determinations are
will only become apparent once people begin to draw reverse
conclusions on the basis of such determinations. One of whom we would
have least expected it has already done so: the Mayor of Vienna,
Helmut Zilk, expressed it as follows in the column "Quotations" of
the Austrian daily paper Kurier of September 10, 1992:

"The third generation of Germans is
paying reparations to Israel. This principle of causality also
applies to the political situations in Europe today. The Yugoslavia
of today is a creation of the French and the British... In Yugoslavia
peoples have been threaded together like beads on a string - an
astonishing feat... The chaos goes back to the misguided policies of
the French and the British... If the principle of causality applies
to Germany, it must also apply to those countries which created the
old order." (Kurier, September 10, 1992. )

This is the first time I find myself in
agreement with an opinion expressed by the Mayor of Vienna - an
opinion which ought to give Wizenthal and the Israeli-American
Imperium its first slight case of goosebumps. Mayor Zilk should
actually also get the same if he were aware of the ramifications of
his own words about the principle of causality: in my native city, he
himself has commingled different peoples, some even from outside the
Western world, and not by threading them like beads on a string, but
by destroying the closed German settlement area and mixing the
various groups into a gruesome ethnic cup of hemlock.

250

Incitement against
Austria.

All the quotations discussed in this book as
being indicative of Wizenthal's character are only random selections
from an incredible bulk of similar statements, regardless whether it
be lies or incitement to hatred against all things German. By the
same token, the incitement against Austria, her population and her
politicians which I have exposed here is only the tip of an iceberg
of unlawful agitation of this kind. For example, the Wellwoche
of December 18, 1988 quoted Wizenthal as saying:

"Yes. Austria as a whole has also
tried to get out of her responsibility. As we know, 80% of Eichmann's
staff and three quarters of all the commandants of extermination
camps were of Austrian extraction. Nazi criminals from Austria were
responsible for the deaths of three million Jews...

"Consider that 99% of all Jews who
died during the Nazi time were foreigners... Germany has shown the
victims that she does not stand by the Nazi criminals, that she
considers every trial of criminals as a historical lesson. Austria
has very clearly not shown that."

If Wizenthal claims that "99%" of all Jewish
victims were foreigners, then anyone familiar with basic mathematics
must conclude that the 600,000 German Jews could have made up only
one percent of the victims. That would mean that 60 million Jews had
been exterminated by the Nazis. On the other hand, for the Jewish
victims with German citizenship to constitute only one percent of the
generally accepted six million - in other words, 60,000 - it would
mean that 90% of the German Jews survived Hitler's "genocide".

To distill some sense out of this deranged
babble is impossible even for the best-intentioned.

So the insolent fraud from Lemberg once
again wants to teach the German people a lesson, not only in basic
mathematics but also in the practice of regarding every trial "of
criminals as a historical lesson". In such an atmosphere, acquittals
are risky.

Bearing in mind the acrobatic feat which
Wizenthal performed in the wake of the syndicate-instigated Waldheim
Campaign by appearing to distance himself from the attackers and
alternately anointing and upbraiding the Austrian President, we shall
quote his comment in the Weltwoche (February 18, 1988):

"Then I can see only one practical
possibility. The people must make an obvious point of isolating
Waldheinz They must distance themselves from

251

everything for which their President
has become symbolic all over the world."

Why Wizenthal's American providers did
not immediately dispatch their vacillating and unreliable Austrian
agent to well-deserved retirement in an old age home remains a
mystery.

In the Spiegel of December
30, 1991 the Galician with ill-gotten Austrian citizenship agitated
against his "homeland" as follows:

"Of course, after everything that's
happened, people keep a close eye on Germanv and Austria. After all,
neither of them rid themselves of National Socialism, not in military
and not in psychological terms. But nonetheless the Germans knew that
they would have to buy their ticket for readmission into the society
of civilized peoples "(By civilized peoples Wizenthal
means, for example, the Israelis who keep 13,000 Palestinians locked
up in concentration camps as political prisoners and who take shots
at unarmed teenaged demonstrators almost on a daily basis, as well as
the United States who, under the Administration of a Jewish
President, dropped the atomic bombs developed by Jewish scientists on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki.)

"Thence we have the restitution
payments, while Austria hides behind the Allied declaration of 1943
that she was Hitler's first victim." (Spiegel,
December 30, 1991.)

Wizenthal conducts his incitement in the
style of a cunning fraud: Austria, which was separated from
the rest of Germany in 1945 against the will of her people and
in violation of the right of nations to selfdetermination (see the
plebiscites of 1921 and 1938), and which was fully aware of
her impotence, had little choice but to accept this painful
Allied decree, just as she also had no choice with regard to the
audacious lie of Austria's "liberation" - a lie invented by the
American secret service CIA and its cultural mission. Of course it
was not possible for the criminal American occupation power to pursue
its goal ofthe unlawful separation of Austria from the
rest of Germany by propagating the lie of Hitler's rape of Austria on
the one hand if it continued at the same time to declare Austria part
of the German nation in order to facilitate the collective punishment
of the German people and the reparations payments to Israel. Such
shenanigans would not have gone unnoticed. But our Galician crook is
once again trying to square the circle. He takes the conditions which
were forced on Austria by the Allies with criminal intent and whose
most brutal one was the reestablishment of the insane border between
Austria and Bavaria, and portrays these conditions, not as an Allied
decree, but as an attempt by Austria to get out of its responsibility
for alleged "murders of Jews" of which neither the Allies nor
the Germans, and thus not the Austrians either, had any

252

knowledge at the time this decree was
imposed. (Moscow Declaration of 1943.)

The deal with which the Allied criminals -
the syndicate for which Wizenthal stands - already ripped us off in
1945 is now to be used to rip us off a second time, in a reversal of
the original: We Austrians are not permitted to be Germans, but
now, half a century later, we are supposed to burden ourselves, our
children and our grandchildren with the German collective guilt!
At least in the pillory where Wizenthal, faithful to his mission,
seeks to place "the Germans", the Austrian dream of German unity has
become realized and our joint fate, though defrauded and disgraced,
has been restored.

I welcome that, at least.

The "cocky Germans".

On Monday, December 17, 1990, our
anti-German preacher of hate was in fine form once again, as we can
see from the Austrian tabloid Kurier:

"Take the German reunification, for
example. We know from history that the Germans got cocky when they
were strong."

Indeed, we have little of the Israeli Jews'
humility. We Germans have also, unfortunately, been shortchanged in
the Americans' brand of modesty which is so very much appreciated in
the Third World - especially in Latin America, Black Africa, Arabia
and Vietnam. But it's not nice to make fun of us for hereditary
defects.

Our Galician disciplinarian does also have
some encouraging words for us, however:

"First of all, I believe that Germany
learned the lesson it was taught in 1945, and its effects will go on
for generations." (Karntner Tageszeitung, December 29,
1989.)

What a relief. It's good to hear our "moral
authority", that aged crook Szymon Wizenthal of Lemberg, finally
correct one of the historical lies we have been forced to swallow so
far: in the Second World War Germany was not, as Wizenthal & Co.
have mendaciously told us for so long, "liberated from the yoke of
National Socialist dictatorship", but was merely "taught a lesson".
Future generations as well - our children, grandchildren and
greatgrandchildren (and all the way on to the seventh generation?) -
have also, in Wizenthal's opinion, been "taught a lesson". And
finally, Wizenthal says what I have already been preaching for 32
years now: that the United States of America - the world's greatest
democracy, and directed by Jews: "God's

253

own country", so to speak - only used
National Socialism and Hitler as an excuse to destroy, partition and
scourge the German people.

Which proves once again: the best weapon
against Szymon Wizenthal and the American cultural aggression in
German lands is Wizenthal himself. The best medicine against the
Galician fraud is his own words.

Incitement against the
Church.

German Catholics, especially in Austria,
South Tyrol and Bavaria, have been pained to see Wizenthal launch
hateful and disrespectful attacks on the Catholic Church, and on the
Holy Father Pope Pius XII in particular.

"The aid committees (i.e. aid
committees for persecuted members of the SS) were promoted in
particular by the Catholic Church, which suddenly remembered its
humanitarian duties. Although during the Nazi period it had not done
much for prisoners and virtually nothing for concentrationcamp
inmates, it was now evidently trying to make up for its omissions by
looking after the inmates of POW camps.

"In many instances, however, the
assistance of the Church went far beyond the mere toleration of aid
committees and actually amounted to abetting criminals..."
(JNV p. 54-55.)

Here Wizenthal forgets that in 1946 the war
was over and that the "POWs" were in fact forced labor slaves
detained under monstrous conditions - Germans of whom almost a
million were deliberately left to starve by the Americans alone (cf.
James Bacque, Other Losses, Toronto: Stoddart, 1989).
The collective guilt for this "Jewish-American" crime (to use a
Wizenthalian generalization) is something which Sneaky Szymon will
not be able to evade by finagling Austrian citizenship and German
ethnicity for himself.

"In many instances, however, the
assistance of the Church went far beyond the mere toleration
of aid committees and actualty amounted to abetting criminals: the
most important escape route, the so-called `monastery route' between
Austria and Italy, came into being. Roman Catholic priests,
especially Franciscans, helped Odessa channel its fugitives from one
monastery to the next, until they were received by the Caritas
organization in Rome. Best known was a monastery on Via Sicilia in
Rome, a monastery under the control of the Franciscans, which
became a veritable transit camp for Nazi criminals. The man who
organized this hideout was no less than a bishop and came from Graz:
in his memoirs Alois Hudal subsequently boasted of the many top
people from the Third Reich to whom he had been able to render
`humanitarian aid'.

254

"It is difficult to guess the motives
of these priests." (JNV p. 55.)

Wizenthal will also find it difficult to
guess why Christ, when he was struck on one cheek, turned the other.
He will also not be able to understand why Christ consoled the
robbers who were crucified along with him.

Wizenthal will have a hard time with
everything Christ said or did. The New Testament is full of pitfalls
for a man of this Galician crook's stripe. If it were the Old
Testament that was at issue, however, Wizenthal would be firmly in
control. In matters of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,
Wizenthal is in his element.

His attacks on the so highly commendable
Bishop Alois Hudal - who in self-sacrificing manner saved the lives
of countless German officers hunted by the hate-driven Allied
judiciary merely for the sake of their membership in the SS and who
were in danger of torture and death for no other reason than that -
represents a criminal offense under Austrian law (§ 117 StGB),
since Hudal acted in the performance of his ecclesiastical duties.

Incitement against General
Franco.

In Madrid on February 17, 1992 the Spanish
news agency EFE released a report in which the American agent Szymon
Wizenthal, in Spain at that time, defamed the memory of General
Francisco Franco by alleging that he aided war criminals after the
Second World War. In the process the vain old man again had himself
referred to as "cazanazis", meaning "Nazi hunter".

Here again, audacity and ingratitude appear
as the Galician's particularly prominent character traits. Despite
his close ties to Germany and to Hitler, Franco refused to permit the
internment or expulsion of the Jews in Spain.

But that's not enough for
Wizenthal.

He had travelled to Spain to push his new
book Operacion Nuevo Mundo, which deals with Christopher
Columbus and aims at making the notion that Columbus was a Son of
Judea palatable to the Spaniards. On the same occasion Wizenthal also
deemed it appropriate to come out with a couple of hate speeches
against the 91-year-old Wilhelm Ollenbusch for allegedly making
anti-Jewish propaganda in the Third Reich. If all Jews behaved like
Wizenthal, then I too would probably succumb to the fascination which
I always used to think anti-Semitism only had for the narrowminded.

Incidentally, Wizenthal also took the
opportunity presented by his stay in Spain to slander the French
university professor Robert Faurisson, deceiving the Spanish
journalists to the effect that the French scholar had

255

been convicted in his country for spreading
lies about history. Who was actually spreading the lies here is
clear: Wizenthal, as always.

To summarize:

The image of Wizenthal the Great
Crime-Fighter, the larger-than-life Sherlock Holmes who brought 1,000
"murderers" to trial in 50 years, fails to stand up to close
examination. Wizenthal, whom his personal cheerleader Peter Michael
Lingens portrays as lone fighter with a phenomenal photographic
memory, who makes do in his office with only a part-time secretary
(who, incidentally, always had to be Jewish), cannot really have
conducted criminal investigations of the cases he claims to have
solved.

1,000 cases in 50 years averages out to
approximately two cases solved per month. After deducting the time
Wizenthal spends on multi-continental lecture tours to spout his
hatemongering tirades about "the Germans" and their hereditary
responsibility for the "guilt" of their parents and grandparents, he
would be left with about one afternoon per complex murder case.

In all of Austria there is not one criminal
investigations officer who has solved 1,000 murder cases in his
entire career, whether alone or together with his team. Even if there
were such a vast supply of murder cases in our country, and even if
the detectives from the homicide squad did not write books like
Wizenthal, did not give press conferences and hatemongering lectures
like Wizenthal, and did not, like Wizenthal, sneak into Parliament
disguised as civil rights activists to help give birth to new
antidemocratic laws, they would not be able to work such a
criminological miracle.

Any criminologist will confirm that such
far-reaching investigations which are not even confined to one
specific department or precinct, but span continents and oceans,
cannot possibly be accomplished single-handedly by one lone man who,
as we learn with a pang of compassion, must even beg for five dollar
donations in order to be able to pay his electricity bills. According
to Lingens, the disinformation headquarters of Wizenthal's personal
news service, the kindly angel who paid the postal and telephone
expenses of at least Wizenthal's first one-man office (JNU p. ix) was
called Israel Silberschein. Or perhaps just "Israel" - that would
probably be more accurate. But the touching story of Mr. Israel who
foots the electricity bills for poor lame Szymon who has been
suffering from heart problems for 50 years and who at the time of
this printing is already well over ninety, loses some of its
philanthropic glow when one opens Wizenthal's book to page xi, where
the astonished reader learns (as a sort of reward for having
struggled

256

through the first few pages) that the Senate
and House of Representatives in California donated five million
dollars to the Simon Wiesenthal Center. For a specific purpose, mind
you: for tolerance!

This is where one must grit one's teeth and
choke back any anti-Semitic resentment that may well up...

This donation was only the contribution
for 1987. And from only one American state. But America has 50 of
them.

Neither Israel nor Mr. Silberschein need
lose any sleep over the electricity bills incurred by Wizenthal's
touching one-man operation. Nor shall we get sentimental over the
idealistic addendum which Wizenthal confides to us in the context of
his staggering postal and telephone expenses - whispered modestly and
almost in lieu of a tax return:

"Later I was able to use part of my
restitution payments from West Germany for this purpose."
(JNV p. ix.)

Ah, from "West Germany". That's a return
address familiar to anyone in this world with regular payments to
collect.

No, really - Wizenthal will have to dispense
with the image of the old Jewish Maigret who, digging through
newspaper clippings in his desk drawers, catches a whole battalion of
"mass murderers" with the aid of his phenomenal memory. We do want to
be frank with each other, don't we? So why not just list the
organizations with which Wizenthal, according to his own information,
has collaborated or is collaborating: CIA, CIC, Mossad, OSI, KGB, WJC
(World Jewish Congress), ADL (Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai
B'rith), as well as the various Israeli religious communities
throughout the world. (The fact that the latter work closely with the
Israeli secret service, the Mossad, is an aside documented in the
book By Way of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky, a renegade
Mossad agent.)

We shall return to the network for which
Szymon Wizenthal stands in the chapter "Power" (p. ). His real
mission as part of the anti-German propaganda, which is steered by
the Israeli-American Imperium and whose backbone unquestionably are
the "Holocaust" and the "Shoah", is the gathering and coordination of
the false witnesses, the directing of media campaigns, and for the
rest, strictly representative tasks: his principals soon realized
that, despite his mediocre intelligence, irrespective of his vanity
and his manic obsession with publicity, and with the aid of his 100
missing aunts and uncles, the mixture of cunning play-actor,
self-possessed sadist and quick-witted soap-box thumper that
Wizenthal unites in his person was able to effectively present Jewish
suffering worldwide and enlist it in the service of incitement
against Germany.

257

His generalizing allegations of the
hereditary guilt borne by the German people have racist overtones. He
insists on the collective responsibility of the German people without
considering that in a straight reversal of his arguments the Jews can
then be held responsible for the policies of America and Israel, and
with much greater justification, since these nations consider
themselves democratic constructs, not "dictatorships". In that sense,
his verbal denials of any collective guilt must be regarded as the
attempts of a criminal to safeguard himself.

Under the laws in force today, his actions
constitute incitement a thousand times over.

How Wizenthal forced a law against me
through the Austrian Parliament.

How he had the press accuse me of
"individual" acts of violence, patterned on his "Nazi war crimes
trials", in order to pave the way for my April 1992 trial.

The obligatory "murder of children on the
selection ramp" was specially modified for my case. Instead, I was
falsely and knowingly linked to violence against innocent foreigners.
The good old, tried and true method. The criminal and dishonorable
journalists: Peter Pisa and Ricardo Peyerl from the Kurier,
the house organ of the former American occupation power in
Austria.

Since I am fighting Wizenthal's machinations
with every means at my disposal, I have personally incurred this
man's wrath. This has gone so far that in his book Justice Not
Vengeance he devoted a nice little section to me, right in
company with the "million-fold murderers". I quote:

"The interview was broadcast live
front the Fienna Josefstadt Theatre.
"Within minutes of the beginning (?( the transmission shouts were
suddenly heard `Murderer!' someone called out And `You're a liar!'
Three men leaned over the balustrade of the first tier and threw
stacks of leaflets into the audience .... Their leader was an old
acquaintance: Gerd Honsik, head of the Austrian `Foreigners Halt'
movement and editor of the periodical Hall." (.INV p.
330.)

That I called Szymon Wizenthal a murderer.
and also a fraud - which he wiselv omits from his account - is quite
true. Since the old scoundrel knows full well that I could prove the
"fraud" in any Austrian court, with documents which I don't need the
Russian secret service to forge for me, he has dispensed with
bringing charges against the for accusing him of murder. But I have
been able to document that accusation against him just as solidly in
the present volume (see chapter "Murder in Wizenthal's Footsteps").

Instead, the Galician plotted a more
insidious revenge. He already began to set the course for putting a
judicial stop to my work as author and journalist. He urged a
reduction in the severity of the sentence provided by law for the
"resumption of National Socialist activities" (whatever that's
supposed to be) in order to "make it easier" for juries to reach
verdicts of guilty.

In context of my own case. he puts it
thus:

263

"If, on the other hand, the punishment
were a matter of months then lite offenders would be sentenced .... I
do believe that there is a good case for making the allegations that
'Auschwitz is a lie' a punishable offence. It has never yet been made
for scholarly reasons but has always served the exclusive aim of
making Nazism seem harmless and/or agitating against the Jews ' ...."
(JNV p. 332.)

Wizenthal's dream: that anyone
(theoretically even a circumcised Jew who is also a Communist) would
be sentenced as "Nazi" if he demands that the existence of "gas
chambers" in the Third Reich should be established by means of
scientific evidence such as is the worldwide norm for any violent
crime. In the case of the "gas chambers", however, this routine
securing of material evidence has been neglected to this day. for
reasons unknown. But that bodies can be exhumed even after 50 years
and that gigantic pits dozens of meters wide and deep (such as were
allegedly dug in football-field-sized Treblinka to hold the bodies of
a million murder victims) can still be determined by subject experts
even after decades have passed - these are facts which are clearly
confirmed by the constant discoveries of mass graves between Berlin
and the Ural Mountains, discoveries which have been made only since
the Eastern Bloc has become accessible.

However, these discoveries of mass graves
have a serious flaw where Szymon and his "sense of justice" are
concerned, and thus they do not interest him: the problem is that
regardless whether these gruesome .iscoveries were made in the
immediate vicinity of former German concentration camps, which were
used as prisons for National Socialists or POWs after the war's end,
or whether they were made in the vastnesses of the Russian steppe,
these mass graves have yielded only victims of the Allied powers to
date.

No Jews - ergo, no interest on Wizenthal's
part.

I shall dispense with details about the
press reports telling of the public "statements" and trick maneuvers
with which Wizenthal cunningly prepared the way for the legislative
amendment that was aimed against me and my book Freisprueh
für Hitler?.

How Wizenthal got into
Parliament:

Disguised as "constitutional lawyers",
eight biased Jews were unlawfully smuggled into the Austrian
Parliament's Justice Committee on November 20, 1991.

The operation described here and documented
on p. (cf. facsimile) is perhaps one of this century's most masterful
impersonation hoaxes.

264

the Austrian Parliament, the place of
legislation and of doing the people's will. was used by Wizenthal and
his accomplices and stooges to stage an unsavory comedy.

On November 20, 1991 the factions of the
Austrian Justice Committee, representing all the parties making up
the Austrian Parliament (namely. SPO, OVP. FPO and the Green
Communists), had summoned 21 "experts" to a "Hearing".

According to the Stenographic Protocol of
the National Council, XVIII GP. Addendum No. 387 to the Justice
Committee's Report and Motion, those who were supposed to be given a
forum in this "Hearing" were to be drawn from the areas of
constitutional law, criminal jurisprudence, penal legislation, the
judiciary and the security authorities.

These subject restrictions were not met
by 8 of the 21 persons present. These eight persons obtained
access to the Austrian Parliament's Justice Committee, for which they
had no material qualifications and no legal authorization, under
false pretenses and with assistance from the Minister of Justice.
They are:

The Committee thus included roughly 30%
persons of Jewish extraction who are known to be either particularly
biased or to belong to biased Jewish organizations.

Such a disproportionate composition of this
committee, which grants an ethnic minority constituting 0.2% of the
total population the right to supply one-third of the committee
members, must be considered a brutal violation

265

of both the letter and the spirit of the
Federal Austrian Constitution, and this also cannot be changed by
reference to the fact that the persons named are members of that
ethnic group which, on the basis of the "Holocaust" theory, consider
themselves the party injured by those whose incarceration the
reformation of the law at issue was to facilitate: for our
constitutional principles preclude the "victims" being put in charge
of the creation of those laws under which the alleged "culprits" are
to be punished. In the community of those nations calling themselves
"democracies" there has perhaps never yet been a case where the
voting public was more grossly deceived and the principle of the
separation of powers more thoroughly violated!

As far as I am concerned, it would have been
perfectly acceptable to constitute this Committee solely of
persons of Jewish extraction (as long as they were Austrian citizens)
- if they had been uncontestable persons whose inner loyalty to
Austria and her history was beyond question.

In other words: if they had been Jewish
personalities such as the kind, wise and unforgettable Dr. Michael
Stern, the honorable Benedikt Kautsky, the far-sighted Bruno Kreisky,
or Friedrich Adler who professed his allegiance to Austria and the
German people even as Jew in exile in England, or, to mention some
personalities still among the living, Dr. Gfinther Nenning or even
Professor Viktor Frankl - then one could have looked forward to the
results of the discussions with confidence.

The persons actually involved in the case in
question, however, who wormed their way into the Austrian Parliament
under false colors, could not have proven their inner ties to Austria
any more than their subject qualifications and their integrity of
character.

Let me comment on the worst cases among
them:

1. Dr. Gabriel Lansky.

Hans Pretterebner's book Der Fall Lucona
(subtitle: "Eastern espionage, corruption and murder in the upper
echelons of government"), which forced the conviction of Freemason
Udo Proksch on six counts of murder after a decade of resistance by
Socialist government Ministers, reports about Gabriel Lansky as
follows (p. 458):

"Extremely active politically, and
residing ideologicaltv in the no-man'sland between the
extreme-leftist fringe of the Socialist government party and
the Communist Party of Moscow, Lansky has become known as a
neurotic hater of all things middle-class who suspects
'conservative

266

clerical conspiracies' around every
corner, as well as a professional 'anti-Fascist C..

"By now, Lansky, who also frequently
appears as legal counsel to house squatters, terrorist demonstrators
and RAF sympathizers, strikes even tire Austrian state police as a
hit suspicious. Accordingly, the latter has included him in its 'file
of extremists'." (Der Fall Lucona, pp. 458-459.)

Even if one disregards for the moment
Gabriel Lansky's lack of subject and moral qualifications, the
question still remains: what is a pro-Communist Freemason and leftist
lawyer to terrorists doing in our Parliamentary building as advisor
to our democracy's legislative body?

In the context of Lansky. the author
Pretterebner also refers to a kind of memo which one of the lawyers
to the insurance defrauder and murderer Udo Proksch had drawn up to
determine their trial strategy. The memo is unsigned, but
Pretterebner has attributed it to Lansky unchallenged. It
states:

"'I feel that this court acts no
differently than anyone else: whatever one is very frequently told in
a very decided manner takes on a life c?/ its own, develops a
dynamic force, grows larger and unconscioustv takes up more room than
many other more significant and more valid
arguments.'

"lit that sense, in the case of tire
advisers to Proksch, one must simply 'indoctrinate the high court, as
it were'." (Der Fall Lucona, p. 461.)

Anyone who believes that Gabriel Lansky said
this with reference to the theory of the "gas chambers" is far off
the mark. Lansky merely tried to draw on a general, tried-and-true
technique in order to make the untruthful justifications offered by
Udo Proksch, the prisoner awaiting trial, come to seem more credible
by means of the constant repetition of invalid covering lies than the
arguments of the prosecution, which he recognized as valid.

In my opinion, rather than to continue
serving as a guardian of the law, an attorney with such a misguided
sense of justice might well be urged by the Law Society to consider
making his living in a different field.

That such a colorful personality should
be chosen i.e. selected to waltz up before the honorable members of
the House as assistant in an impersonation hoax to abuse Austrian
jurisprudence is incomprehensible.

267

2. Dr. Georg Zanger.

Georg Zanger is no less shady a
character:

"..Nalolli was defended by a
well-known young lawyer from Fenna: Georg Zanger, official attorney
to the Communist Party of Austria and the son of Jakob Zanger, legal
counsel to Proksch." (Der Fall Lucona, p. 297. )

The claim that there is an affinity between
Jewry and Communism is usually rejected as being unfounded.

However, given the round of figures making
their appearance here, one might almost be tempted to dust off this
old prejudice once again. Particularly in our times, where it has
been scientifically established and thoroughly documented that
Communism has been responsible for genocides claiming 40 million
lives in Eastern Europe alone, and as many as 45 million in Red
China, to have the Jewish attorney Georg Zanger from the dynasty of
Communist Party lawyers serve as advisor to the Parliament of a
nation where only 2 of every 1,000 persons share in the ideology of
communism is a grave insult to the principle that states that power
must proceed from the people.

In other words, this legislative farce
infiltrated the House with precisely those shady characters from the
pool of Austrian defense counselors who to this day deny, approve or
trivialize the mass murders committed under the criminal Communist
ideology, and let them sit in judgement over those Austrians who call
for the adduction of scientific material evidence with regard to the
mass murder of Jews with poison gas.

All of these Jews with Austrian citizenship
who were smuggled into the Parliamentary Committee illegally and
under false pretenses must be considered biased, selectively blind
and unqualified in character because there is not one among them who
was ever prepared, like the former Chancellor Bruno Kreisky, to
publicly criticize Israel and its measures to oppress the Palestinian
people.

This was a case of Jews sitting in judgement
over Austrians and forging plans for their incarceration because they
presume to call for the evidence that is the norm in any violent
crime, while the self-proclaimed legislators have not so much as a
word of regret and apology and no gesture of restitution to spare for
the 13,000 political prisoners vegetating in Israeli concentration
camps and the thousands of young Palestinian demonstrators murdered
by the Israeli military (cf. Amnesty International, German
1991 Yearbook, pp. 207-213). They all deny the
Palestinian people's right to self-determination, they also deny the
Palestinians' equality as citizens of Israel,

268

and since they disregard such basic
principles of justice they have no business being in the company of
jurists, unless it were as defendants in court. And all this is
irrespective of the fact that Szymon Wizenthal (even if one
disregards the fraud, forgeries and even the more serious points of
suspicion 7 have raised) openly admits his complicity in the
abduction of Adolf Eichmarm from Argentina and has even bragged of
it. A kidnapper as legal advisor?!

The dishonesty, duplicity and ambiguous
loyalty of the persons of Jewish extraction listed here also follow
from the fact that they have (sometimes publicly) portrayed the
Austrians as "hostile to foreigners" because these demand the
continued preservation of their old-established and closed settlement
area, while they themselves are utterly uncritical of Israel's
settlement policies and of Jewish racism made respectable by a veneer
of religious motivation.

Should the Austrian Minister of Justice. Dr.
Michalek, a member of this Justice Committee, really not have known
all this?

How should people be able to prove that
inner bond with Austria (which one might expect from advisors to our
people's representatives) if they want to see our nation's annual
birth deficit compensated for by the immigration of people of all
races and religions, while at same time standing by the policies of
the Israeli state which has granted Israeli citizenship to not so
much as one single non-Jew in all the years since its founding?

Wizenthal "plants a time-bomb" in
Austrian Parliament:

He makes the Nuremberg Tribunal of Vengeance
socially acceptable after 50 years.

As any student of law learns in the very
first semester in the course of introductory lectures, our legal
system, based as it is on Roman law, forbids the passing of penal
legislation with retroactive force. And so it was no surprise that
scholars of jurisprudence at universities throughout the world
refused to recognize as legitimate the Inter-Allied Military Tribunal
of Nuremberg (IMT), which engaged in lengthy show trials to convict
not only the entire government of the Reich but numerous German army
officers as well, even for "crimes" such as carrying out orders
sanctioned by martial law.

If nothing else, the fact that this
"Nuremberg justice" was never again exercised on any other vanquished
nation - despite the numerous crimes that have been committed since
1945 - should demonstrate to even the most

269

naive that this Tribunal used the military
power which had appointed it to subject the vanquished to a brutal
act of revenge unparalleled in modern times.

Drawing support from the puppet governments
they had appointed (and these puppet governments, in turn, drawing
support from the media whom they were able to bring almost uniformly
into their camp with the assistance of their foreign principals), the
victorious Allies largely succeeded in preventing any inquiry into
the history of the Third Reich and into post-War history - yet
criticism of the "justice" meted out by the IMT has nonetheless
become firmly established in public awareness. As case in point,
under their entries for "International Military Tribunal of
Nuremberg" various encyclopedias today already comment, cautiously
but unmistakably, that these precedents have not in fact been
incorporated into international law.

Wizenthal, whose gruesome activities are
after all based on the arbitrary "justice" of the Nuremberg tribunal,
picked up the thread at this point, and in his commando attack on the
Austrian Parliament, in the vanguard of six unreasonable and biased
Jews, he evidently succeeded in restoring the Nuremberg Tribunal of
Vengeance to a semblance of respectability. If one studies the
addenda to the Stenographic Protocols of the National Council, XVIII
GP/387/p. 4, one finds that Wizenthal and his raiding party managed
to dupe the Committee and its members. We read:

"Following Article 6 Itr. c of the
Charter of the Inter-Allied Military Tribunal of Nuremberg, the term
'crimes against humawitv' is taken to include, in particular, murder,
extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts
committed against a civilian population..."

This passage which our parliamentary report
cites from the Inter-Allied Military Tribunal would not be so bad if
only it were applied to the Israeli government, the members of the
Knesset, and the six hardened, implacable, utterly unrepentant and
stubborn Jewish chauvinists who weaseled their way into the Halls of
Law and Order in the guise of legal experts, led by Wizenthal and
protected by the Austrian Minister of Justice, Michalek.

But that is precisely the injustice of
Nuremberg: that it did not want to punish crimes, just to convict
Germans.

So, in 1991, the Austrian Parliament, with
the participation of all the parties represented in the Parliament,
now based decisions on "Nuremberg law", knowing full well that this
was injustice. Still, I believe that most of the Representatives
accepted the insertion of this passage into the parliamentary
protocols without objection only because they were ignorant of the
origin and history of the act in question, and of its originators.

270

At this point I would like to quote the
former President of the World Jewish Congress. Dr. Nahum Goldmann,
and his book The.Jewish Paradox:

"During the war lite WJC (World Jewish
Congress) bad created an Institute of Jewish Affairs in New York (its
headquarters are now in London). The directors were two great
Lithuanian Jewish jurists, Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson. Thanks to
them, the Institute worked out two completely revolulionarv ideas:
the Nuremberg tribunal and German reparations." (p. I 22.
)

This revelation is of great significance
because the connection between the never-ending hunt for "German war
criminals" and the equally neverending restitution payments has long
been disputed, including in numerous trials of Revisionists in
Austria and Germany.

Goldmann clears matters up for
us:

In one single sentence we learn that it was
two Jews who, working with a Jewish institute. invented the two
"revolutionary ideas" of war crimes trials and German reparations.

What Goldmann doesn't say, but what we know
anyway, is that this Jewish institution succeeded in making this
bright idea of the two Lithuanian Jews palatable to the United
States, the British world empire, the Grande Nation and to Stalins
Soviet Union, and also succeeded in prompting these great powers to
actually commit the judicial murder of the German officers corps and
the government of the Reich. If the Representatives of the four
Austrian parties had consulted real experts on constitutional law
instead of Wizenthal, the religious community and lawyers for the
Austrian Communist Party, they would have learned that even Germany
has avoided giving an express contractual acknowledgment of the "war
crimes verdicts" handed down by Allied military courts in Germany -
and that also includes the IMT's verdict of October I, 1946.

But as it was, our parliamentarians
blundered squarely into Wizenthal's trap, whose closing consists of
our Representatives having to realize some day that the Second
Austrian Republic is the only country on earth to have turned the
trick of two Baltic Jews. and the crime resulting from it, into a
moral foundation for its criminal legislation. This shows clearly how
very important it must have been for the Galician to be present in
the Parliament and its Justice Committee, and what a mighty stench
remains from the fart that our crook released in the columned halls
of the House.

In my own May 1992 trial as well -
even though I had never been in charge of a concentration camp but
had merely written a book -the Wizenthal Machinery unfolded along the
same lines as in real war crimes trials: newspaper headlines and
Austrian television broadcasts featured my name

271

even months before the trial began. I was
untruthfully linked to discoveries of firearms caches and to
"paramilitary" youth groups, and last but not least, accused of
planning an armed coup. It goes without saying that these
accusations, without exception, were dreamed up with the intent to
slander me. It is typical and revealing of the Wizenthal Syndicate
that the Austrian informant and Wizenthal-buddy Dr. Wolfgang
Neugebauer of the "Documentary Archives of the Austrian Resistance"
(a man who to date has reported 600 of his fellow citizens to the
public prosecutor for "extremist activities" and has demanded their
arrest for their views on history which happened to differ from his
own) accused me, a known fighter for the refutation of the
"Holocaust", of distributing "Nazi computer games" in which the
murder of Jews with poison gas is glorified.

The day before my trial began, the Kurier
- the Austrian tabloid in Wizenthal's thrall, popularly known as
"the Voice of Israel" - and its editor Dieter Lenhardt - who, as you
may see from the previous, was part of Wizenthal's attack force that
invaded the Justice Committee in the guise of experts on
constitutional law -published a half-page article in which I was
described as a "teacher" of three convicted violent criminals accused
of having mistreated foreigners.

To complete the parallelism with war crimes
trials, the Kurier supplemented its hatemongering article with
the photo of a little foreign girl (see facsimile, p.) which had no
more to do with the crime for which the three youths were convicted,
than the convicts themselves had to do with me. The little foreign
girl was simply used to provide the propagandistic element in my case
which, in the real "war crimes trials", is provided by the obligatory
individual murder of the Jewish child on the selection ramp.

So Wizenthal managed the feat of inventing,
propagating and forcing through Parliament an Austrian law aimed at
me and my work as author, while at the same time directing and
producing the setting via his usual media campaign, and then, after
my conviction, giving voice to his satisfaction in interviews.

This masterful theatrical, organizational
and psychological performance demands respect. When I realized what
was going on I was as amazed as I had been as a child in the puppet
theater when I found out that one single man pulled all the strings
from which the puppets danced.

Why SS-men were brave at the front and
manful in court, but trembled at being interviewed by Wizenthal and
his minions.

Wizenthal tries his "hand": strip search
and interrogation!

Anyone who reads Szymon Wizenthal's books
attentively, time and again comes across passages where the author
lingers over the pain. horror and fear of his victims. Aside from the
fact that we do not generally find such descriptions in serious
criminological literature, Wizenthal lingers over the terror he
spreads and the tears he causes a bit longer than would lie necessary
to get his point across.

Let me give you an example. In the foreword
to the book analyzed her,,. we read:

"It was on one of the first few days..
that the door opened and an SS man was brought in [...]
shaking, a bundle if fear. [..] 'It was as if a hare
wins expected to grasp that the huntsman was afraid of it... "`
(JNV p. I 3.)

The shaking SS-man, who crops up in several
places in Wizenthal's opus and is described in detail, tells us a
great deal about the personality of the man who calls himself "Nazi
hunter", about the abyss of his psyche. and about what actually
happened in the concentration camps after the inmates and the
American soldiery took over.

Probably even among those historians who
give biased and one-sided and deliberately negative accounts of the
Third Reich, there are none Mho doubt that the ranks of the SS were
made up of particularly tough men who had undergone brutal training
and who had usually volunteered for such units. It is also an
undisputed fact that wherever the SS were posted to serve at the
front (Waffen-SS) they displayed especial bravery, especial
preparedness for self-sacrifice, and an utter disdain for their own
death.

Beyond that, we know that even in post-1945
war crimes trials, member, of the SS - such as Robert Verbelen,
Rajakovich, Dejaco and Ertl - responded even to threats of life
imprisonment with an awesome self-control and fearless resolve which
the Austrian and German public, aware of what was self-evident and
common knowledge about the SS, had come to expect from members of
this order. Even directly in the face of death, SS-men hone their
heavy burden coolly, apparently unemotionally, and courageously right
to the bitter end. In this context I remind the reader of Adolf
Eichmann', deportment in his glass cage in Jerusalem.

Now, when we hear from Wizenthal that SS-men
in Mauthausen were shaking with fear when they were dragged in to the
interrogation, this proves

277

that something must have been done to these
men, or been in store for them, that exceeded by far anything that
human beings could bear.

For a change Wizenthal is telling the truth.
Even if the German and Austrian public and the left-wingers -
particularly the left-wing intellectuals - know nothing of the
horrible torture inflicted by Jewish-American interrogation
specialists on the SS guards and the captured Waffen-SS soldiers,
these bestial torture methods that are unequaled in the western world
in post-Inquisition times are nonetheless documented in devastating
detail in court files, investigation findings and witness testimony.

From the butchery of the Dachau guards by
the American soldiery and the torturing-to-death of the surviving
wounded by Wizenthal's criminal concentration camp pals, to the
martyrdom of the commandant of Auschwitz. H6ss, who was kept
handcuffed for three weeks straight and who, lying on a butcher's
bench, was beaten and tortured by British Jews for three full weeks
in the village Heide until he lost consciousness as well as his
powers of speech, there stretches a gruesome way of the cross whose
victims have yet to be counted, whose torturers have yet to be
punished, and whose agonies have yet to be published. (cf Wigbert
Grabert, Geschichlsbetrachtung als Wagnis, Tubingen: Grabert,
1984.)

Just as murderers are drawn back to the site
of their crime, so Szymon Wizenthal's thoughts and words circle like
vultures around the trembling SSmen being led in to be interrogated.

He cannot describe how they look, he cannot
explain what shape they were in, cannot tell us about their crushed
testicles, their broken jaws, or the heat chambers for their
confinement. And he also cannot reveal the practice of withholding
"food stamps" for their wives and children or the violent excesses
committed against their next-of-kin. To do so would be treasonous.

But to linger over the trembling bundle of
humanity as which such a formerly proud and brave SS-man was dragged
in to him - that is something he can't do without. Yet in the
heat of his apparently compulsive actions he forgets that by
indicating that these men, so brave in battle and so valiant in
court, might have had good cause to be deathly afraid of those
interrogations, he runs the risk of pointing his readers in the
direction of those crimes which his concentration camp buddies and
the criminal soldiery of his liberators committed with impunity on
German soil for weeks, months and years.

(See photos and text, pp. ff.)

Like semi-official historiography as a
whole, Wizenthal too likes to claim that the SS scrupulously removed
all traces and evidence of their atrocities. This theory would seem
to be contradicted by one of the most

278

gruesome and most retarded stories Wizenthal
has ever served his reading public. Again in the context of
"trembling SS-men", Wizenthal has his cheerleader Peter Michael
Lingens write the following:

"When Simon Wiesenthal was searching
one of those trembling SS man for papers he found a picture in his
wallet: it showed a young man who had been strung up by his
testicles." (JNV p. 14.)

I doubt that there is any mammal on this
planet, and certainly no homo sapiens, whose testicles would
be able to support his body weight. But the Galician crook expects us
to believe in this physiological miracle.

Of course Wizenthal will not be able to show
you this photo. He will also not be able to cite the court file
containing the photo, will not be able to give the name of the SS-man
who allegedly carried the picture in his wallet. and not even the
punishment to which the torturer was sentenced. Much less the name of
the victim.

And thus he revels in gruesome tales and
bloodthirsty fantasies, and he could not care less that there is a
wealth of orders and witness testimonies that prove that the SS were
strictly forbidden to lay a hand on prisoners.

It is probably unnecessary to add here that
the SS were not permitted to carry cameras at work as though they
were some sort of tourist, and that they could also not jaunt off to
the dark room whenever they chose to.

There is also no evidence to indicate that
the SS admitted mentally deranged people to their ranks. But that is
exactly what the SS man here at issue would have to have been if he
had carried the horrible evidence for his atrocity next to his heart
(instead of a photo of his sweetheart) right until he was dragged,
"trembling", to the barracks to be "body searched" by the Hatemonger
Himself. Even if this had been an inconceivably slow-wilted SS-man,
the blasting of the "gas chambers", the peaceful surrender of the
concentration camp Mauthausen to the International Red Cross, and
later the advance of the American troops, should have brought it home
to the SS-idiot of Wizenthal's lively imagination that it was
gradually coming to be time either to part with the well-loved
picture or to find a better hiding place for it than his wallet,
which the criminal concentration camp inmates were no less interested
in than the American soldiers. Fortunately such horror stories were
not concocted and peddled after the war with the approval of
Wizenthal's superiors. Given the bad experiences the Allied
propagandists had made with the hacked-off hands of Belgian children,
and due to the fact that the people were only too well aware of the
iron discipline of the SS, Wizenthal subsequently had to repress his
fondness for tales of this sort. At that time Allies still preferred
to portray the "mass murders" in the Third Reich as a

279

crime ordered from higher-up, and carried
out assembly-line-style in blind obedience by highly disciplined men.

Years went by before Wizenthal was able to
get his way for reasons of trial strategy and to have his witnesses
allege individual personal crimes and excesses, because allegations
of mere cooperation in an industrial-style murder machinery, without
evidence for personal criminal tendencies, often failed to secure
convictions. Only then was the way clear - not, perhaps, for lunatic
horror stories such as the above, that make a mockery of the laws of
nature, but certainly for the individual murders of children,
committed publicly by high-ranking SS officers in violation, not of
the laws of nature, but definitely of those of the Third Reich and of
the reality of everyday life under the National Socialist regime.

Jew overcomes surgeon:

Plastic surgery that Wizenthal finds
funny.

In chapter 17 of Justice Not Vengeance
which Wizenthal titles "Plastic Surgery", he again permits us a
glimpse into the abyss of his criminal character. In the course of my
analysis of his book I have come to the conclusion that in order to
understand Wizenthal it is necessary to include some passages from
his book in detail. I want to mention at the outset that the
conversations Wizenthal repeats for us all seem to me to sound much
like excerpts from the novels of Karl May, whose books Wizenthal has
surely read and whose style no doubt adds a subconscious coloring to
Wizenthal's anecdotes. It would be an interesting project for a
linguist to examine my theory more closely. In Wizenthal's
first-person narratives he always emerges as the superior party in
these dialogues, and his opposite number must always assume the role
of the silly little inferior - regardless whether he be a German
Minister of Justice, an "SS man come down in the world", or, as in
this case, a Jewish surgeon. The parallels to "Kara Ben Nemsi" are
striking. Anyone who spent his childhood devouring Karl May's
adventure novels, as I did (and evidently Wizenthal as well), will
find that the following conversation takes him back to Kara Ben Nemsi
Effendi's conversation with a Turkish village mayor:

"`Please go ahead and tell me,' I
interrupted hisfood of words.

"`Yesterday a man arrived at our
hospital from Argentina .... German - you know, a typical German with
that particular haircut...'

"`So?'

280

"The man wants us to perform a
cosmetic operation on his face. You ought to know that we specialize
in cosmetic surgery."

" `You are to make the German more
beautiful?'

"`That's what he asks me to
do.'

" `So where's the
problem?'

" `I'm convinced that the man is a
Nazi who wants to change his appearance in order to hide his
identity. I consulted with an assistant at my hospital who's a Jew
like myself .... I struggled with the problem one whole night, and
then reduced it to the question "Am I first of all a doctor,
or am I first of all a Jew?"'

" `And who won?'

" `I called you.'

"I assured the excited caller that he
needn't have the slightest anxiety about me. My informers were as
safe with me as with their father confessor.

"The doctor thereupon gave me the full
name of his patient .... At the mention of this locality I jumped...
I tried to conceal my excitement and asked how long the patient was
expected to remain in hospital.

No doubt you, dear reader, have already
realized who is the Effendi (=Master) and who is the good-natured but
somewhat feeble-minded Turkish village mayor here.

Shortly thereafter, our Kara Ben Nemsi's
telephone rings again. And again the caller is a good-natured but
rather silly person, just like the surgeon before her. But this time
it's a Native American Indian nurse. Phew!

The conversation that now follows between
Old Shatterhand and the squaw goes like this:

"A female voice wanted to speak to
Simon WiesenlhaL When I said that was me, the words just tumbled out
of her: `I am a nurse, an American Indian. I'm working at a hospital
here .... I have a Jewish friend who gave me your telephone number
.... his name; it's 'Berger', and he is a German... please don't give
me away .... If it came out that I've passed on information about
patients it'd cost me my job.'

"I made my voice sound excited so the
nurse shouldn't suspect that her information was no news to me,
expressed some outrage at the brazenness with which those bastards
again ventured to show themselves in New York,

281

thanked her for her information and
reassured her that no one would learn anything from me. "
(JNY p. I 3 5-136. )

If any of my readers should have felt that I
had not already proved that Wizenthal is a barnstormer and quack, I
think I have done so now. How the octogenarian "made his voice sound
excited" so that the Indian nurse should not suspect anything -
that's Old Shatterhand, larger than life and hard as nails.

The fact that we now have three Jewish
doctors at this New York hospital who "let the Jew overcome the
surgeon" by denouncing a patient, whereby one of them has himself
represented by an Indian whom he slipped the totem of Wizenthal's
telephone number which he evidently keeps constantly within reach in
his knife belt, should really be enough to make us non-Jews shudder:

To hear how spitefully and cynically the
Jewish surgeons, and Wizenthal himself as well, badmouth the "typical
German" with "that particular haircut" without having any evidence
for his guilt, to hear how they do not hesitate to prolong his stay
in the hospital without any medical need, how they scornfully dismiss
the resultant extra expenses, and how all three of them,
independently of the others, are prepared to break their Hippocratic
oath, must be enough to make any German fear that he might ever end
up under the knife of such a Jewish surgeon himself.

And where Wizenthal is concerned, a criminal
aspect of his character becomes clearly apparent: devoid of any
natural sense of justice, he comments, in a frivolous tone and with
undisguised satisfaction, that the Jew got the better of the surgeon
- "come out on top", as he puts it. And this is the case three times
at one and the same hospital. Drunk with Jewish nationalism and
personal arrogance, he does not even realize that the comment with
which he glorifies the surgeon's violation of his professional oath
on the grounds of his more pressing religious claims only serves to
give Jewry a dishonorable and contemptuous character reference.

To make matters brief: Berger, the patient,
was not the man they sought. He was innocent - at least as much as
Wizenthal can allow any German to be innocent.

When it comes right down to it, the comment
that the Jew overcame the surgeon by violating the Hippocratic oath
is an anti-Semitic remark, which Wizenthal is apparently unable to
grasp. And now Wizenthal once again lingers over a description of
details which, in my opinion, any normal person would seek to keep
quiet - in his own interest. Try to recreate my analysis as

282

you read the following text, with which the
ghastly comedy of plastic surgery concludes. Kara Ben Nemsi of
Galicia speaks:

"A few months later I was in New York
and phoned the surgeon, who was anxious to know how the story had
ended. I told him that his patient was an entirely unimportant
person, of whom we couldn't even say whether he'd been a member of
the Nazi party. His wish for facial surgery had apparently been
prompted by the blonde young lady who'd visited him at the hospital.
And since we had now broken professional medical secrecy so often, I
requested him to show me a photo of his patient. He showed me two,
one before and one after the operation. I was unable to see a great
deal of difference. Evidently the `Jew' within the surgeon had come
out on top." (JNV p. 13 8. )

And in this sneering tone of grisly humor,
Wizenthal carries on in a book which it was allegedly his sacred duty
to the victims to write, etc. etc.

A worse disgrace for the world's Jews
than this spiteful and imprudent confession by a patently sick man is
hard to imagine.

While Wizenthal first used the expression of
the "Jew overcoming the surgeon" only with reference to the fact that
said surgeon notified him and provided the personal data on his
patient, the context in which he repeats that disgusting phrase the
second time (evidently he considers it witty) gives it an even worse
meaning:

The fact that the patient was
deliberately not operated properly and as requested, obviously
because he was a German and was therefore deemed suspect - that
is what Wizenthal considers to be "the Jew's victory
over the surgeon".

When Wizenthal sneers spitefully that he
"was unable to see a great deal of difference" in the patient's
appearance before vs. after the operation, this might well also be a
diplomatically veiled hint that the patient had even been disfigured.
But only an investigation of the case in court could determine that
for certain.

And now, a question - to my readers, but
also to the Austrian and German public and the American and Israeli
people:

Don't you also think that a man who can
write the following must be psychologically abnormal?

"And since we had now broken
professional medical secrecy so qften, I requested him to show me a
photo of his patient." (JNV p. 138. )

At the time after the operation when
Wizenthal requested the photo of the patient, he already knew for
certain that this man was not one of the "war criminals" he was
looking for. Regarding the actual sharing of his patient's photo, the
surgeon himself can also no longer claim that he

283

thought doing so would help shed light on
a crime (unless it was his own).

So what could possibly have prompted
Szymon Wizenthal to ask to see the photo of an Argentinean citizen
who had had a facial operation - a man with short hair, "German
appearance", and of German extraction?

It cannot be medical interest, since
Wizenthal is an architect and has never professed an inclination to
medicine. And that a grown man (with an appointment book as full as
that of the man who solved 1,000 murder cases etc. must be) should
spare the time to view a photo of no apparent professional interest,
of a man who has had unsuccessful or - shall we say - deliberately
bungled facial surgery, just makes no sense in any normal
context.

To me it is certain that this is a case
of a pathological sadist, whose hatred of all things German serves
him as an excuse to satisfy his undiagnosed compulsion to revel and
delight in the suffering of another human being.

The "blonde young lady" (obviously also
suspected of being a German) who had prompted the patient's wish for
the "cosmetic surgery" - why is she described in this
book allegedly devoted to the hunt for murderers, why does Wizenthal
linger over this woman, and if he must do so, why can
he not even find a word of comfort or regret for her who was also
cheated by the Jewish surgeon?

On pages 224-225 Wizenthal
writes:

"Anyone expecting that Jews could
never commit a war crime, never persecute someone unjustly, or
perhaps even never kill, merely shows that he still does not regard
us as the equals of other nations - equals in good and in evil.
Anyone siding with us only as long as we play the part of victim has,
in a different way, remained the same old anti-Semite."
(JNV p. 224-225.)

To keep from being considered an anti-Semite
I will gladly concede that he certainly can persecute people
unjustly, that he may even have interrogated and killed them, and
that he is definitely anyone's equal in evil. But I'd rather not side
with him anyway, even if he does then scold me as anti-Semite.

In his books Wizenthal virtually wallows in
savoring grisly and unproven atrocities. To list all the physically
impossible and juridically utterly unproven scenes of butchery which
occur even in just the single book analyzed here would exceed the
scope of this chapter by far. However, in the context of my theory of
Szymon Wizenthal's sadistic disposition it is vital

284

that the reader should review one more time
the excerpt from JNV reproduced here on page , in which Wizenthal
goes wild with physically impossible and forensically unprovable
torture fantasies.

The space which Wizenthal devotes to the
wives of his "war criminals", whose loyalty he pokes fun at and whose
pain he lingers over longer than any criminological purpose could
warrant - these too are clear indicators that suggest to me that this
man draws on the fear and on the pain he hopes to cause, to gain that
which psychology subsumes under the term "pleasure".

I believe that Szymon Wizenthal is a sick
man. The world just doesn't know it yet.

"At that time I was working fairly
closely with the Austrian police... "

"If I had been aware of this quotation
(from President Tudjman) sooner, I would have prevented
Tudjman's being received by Chancellor Kohl... "

Anyone who identifies the
world-encompassing, power-hungry Jewish Imperium is automatically
branded as a follower of National Socialism or as minority-hating
racist, or at the least as anti-Semite and conspiracy-minded nutcase,
depending on expediency and his nationality.

You and I, dear reader, won't thoughtlessly
run the risk of such labels.

We won't claim that there is a
world-encompassing Jewish power for purposes of persecution Germans
and their former allies.

We won't claim that Wizenthal knows that the
majority of American senators actively side with his
manhunt.

We won't claim that Wizenthal has power of
disposal of the American soldiers and military vehicles.

We won't claim that in his Viennese backyard
office Wizenthal receives visits from diplomats and American
government officials who bring him news and materials or pick up the
same.

We won't claim that Israeli citizens perform
investigative services for him on Austrian soil, without a
license.

We won't claim that the American government
official Neal Shaer, who has become known as "Waldheim hunter" and
who on the orders of his government hunts exclusively for "German war
criminals", pays Wizenthal visits.

We won't claim that Wizenthal makes
suggestions to Austrian public prosecutors which are intended to
prompt them to travel to Israel without delay.

We won't claim that the United States, being
a world power, are ever at the ready to do Wizenthal's bidding by
exerting at least economic pressure on other nations to obtain the
extradition of citizens of those countries.

We won't claim that with just a single phone
call Wizenthal can bring about demonstrations against any country he
chooses, thus manufacturing the "outrage of the world
public".

We won't claim that Wizenthal has such
influence on newspapers and journalists in the nations of the Western
Hemisphere that these are willing to ignore the legal principle that
decrees a person to be innocent until proven

289

guilty, and to enact worldwide campaigns to
obtain the extradition of political refugees who happen to be
Germans.

We won't claim that such journalists are
even prepared to serve as scouts and even to act as agents
provocateurs if Wizenthal wishes it.

We also won't claim that Wizenthal managed,
via the German media giant Axel Springer, to persuade the Bavarian
chief minister Franz Josef Strauss to rig a vote in the German
Bundestag regarding the statute of limitation on war crimes.

We won't claim that the Anti-Defamation
League, the militant vanguard organization of the Masonic lodge B'nai
B'rith, is always ready to assist Wizenthal and that it is headed by
rabbis whom presidents and chief public prosecutors are ever ready to
receive, should Wizenthal wish it.

We also won't claim that Wizenthal planned a
house search at the Red Cross, is able to control the bureaucratic
processing of Austrian court files as well as their degree of
completeness, and that he publicly excludes Austria from membership
in the "civilized world".

And last but not least, we also won't claim
that Wizenthal can influence the Dutch Parliament to pass
resolutions, that he can prompt Senator Robert Kennedy to leap into
action at any time, or that he can ask Sir Winston Churchill Jr. for
political favors.

And we don't need to claim any of
this - because Wizenthal claims all this himself. Let's hear it in
his own words.

Who serves Wizenthal?
His friends and allies.

Wizenthal's opus Justice Not Vengeance
which I have analyzed here offers us valuable insights, of which
I can only quote selections due to their great number:

"I need only have taken a jeep and two
soldiers, and Eichmann would have found himself under arrest. Instead
we turned to the CIC, which resided in the immediate neighbourhood of
Altaussee..."(JNV p. 68.)

Try for a moment to imagine that a
discharged concentration camp inmate in unsettled circumstances and
without steady employment could seriously consider simply "taking a
jeep and two soldiers" - in other words, materiel of war and
personnel of an army to which he does not belong, and part of a
nation whose citizenship he does not possess. But the American

290

secret service CIC also stood ready to ask
"how high?" when our vagabond said "jump!"

"I consulted the Israeli consul in
Vienna, Arie Eschel, who invited me to compile a report for the World
Jewish Congress..." (JNV p. 76.)

Yes, you read correctly: not the ambassador
of the World Jewish Congress (for there is no such thing) but the
Israeli consul in Vienna, who evidently takes care of such matters in
his spare time, advises Wizenthal which legal authorities an Austrian
citizen claiming to be "an ethnic German" should turn to when he
feels like informing on people.

"I sent one copy of the report to Dr.
Nahum Goldmann, the President of the World Jewish Congress, and
another to the Israeli consulate in Vienna." (JNV p.
76.)

We see that the borders are fluid: Israel,
America, Israeli consulate in Vienna, and Szymon Wizenthal - it is no
longer possible to keep a clear view of command structures here;
before our very eyes everything interlinks into an endlessly tangled
web.

Wizenthal's protestations (made years later)
claiming that he had had nothing whatsoever to do with the World
Jewish Congress's campaign and the recall of the Jewish ambassador
from Austria are thus also exposed as the lame self-protective lie of
a wire-puller trying to keep out of the line of fire. In view of the
interconnections, his claim (Profit, no. 30, 1988) that the World
Jewish Congress only consisted of "a few psychopaths" that are
not representative of the Jews in general, can only be taken as a
third-rate effort at play-acting.

"The Israeli embassy thereupon
informed me that two young Israelis would call on me. Very soon
afterwards they turned up in Linz in a great hurry... and
instantly departed On Monday, 23 May 1960, David Ben Gurion told the
Israeli Knesset that Adolf Eichmann had been seized and was in
Israeli custody. The following day I received a telegram from Yad
Vashem: `Warmest congratulations on your brilliant
success.'" (JNV p. 78.)

These two aren't the only "young Israelis"
who appear in the heart of Austria, in Wizenthal's vicinity, with an
eye to running errands. Such representatives of Israeli youth always
appear at the right moment, whenever there is a need for them, to
lighten the workload a bit for our kindly old gent and his one-man
operation.

291

"While still in Amsterdam I contacted
my friends in many different countries and asked them to organize
demonstrations by camp survivors in front of Brazilian
embassies." (JNV p. 86. )

Wizenthal as organizer of worldwide
demonstrations - that's new. Where there are no American soldiers, no
American materiel of war and no young Israelis at hand, the "ethnic
German Austrian" at least has a few telephone numbers at the ready -
the numbers of good friends, of course - with which to trigger the
"outrage of the world public".

"But it was undoubtedly the United
States who could apply the greatest pressure. No sooner had I arrived
in New York than I requested an audience with the former
Attorney-General, Senator Robert Kennedy, and asked for his
intervention. In my presence Kennedy telephoned the Brazilian
ambassador to Washington..." (JNV p. 86.)

That Robert Kennedy didn't want to risk not
calling the Brazilian ambassador until a bit later, but took care to
do so right in Wizenthal's presence, is not really hard to
understand, considering the crafty Galician's bag of tricks.

The fact that the Brazilian government
decided to agree to the demand for Franz Stangl's extradition - as
Wizenthal puts it, "to be on the safe side" and "under the
pressure of public opinion" which, as we have seen, was brought
to bear through various demonstrations triggered by Wizenthal
himself, via telephone - all this completes the picture.

"For months the Brazilian papers had
reported on his reign of terror at Sobibor and carried excerpts from
witnesses' statements... At the beginning of October he hanged
himself at a remote farm." (JNV p. 95. )

This case study shows that once the press
becomes a tool for hire by ill-defined powers, it not only loses its
moral function as an instrument of democracy but also becomes a
fiendish weapon whose means are preconviction and false-witness.

If the "Fourth Power", i.e. the media,
who are supposed to shape public opinion, are not restored to the
hands of the people, but remain in the hands of powers
incomprehensible to their readers, the concept of "democracy" will
have sunk to the level of a curse word in only a few years.

"At that time I was working fairly
closely with the Austrian police and therefore not only learned of
his arrest but was able to take some action. I informed the
Americans..." (JNV p. 97. )

292

It is not clear from this passage whether
Wizenthal informed all Americans or whether a call to, perhaps, the
World Jewish Congress sufficed to put the White House in an uproar.
But what is especially interesting about this passage is that
Wizenthal worked closely with the Austrian police: we know that the
police co-operates with institutions similar to itself in foreign
countries, and we also know that it sometimes works together with
private investigators, but in the context of its "working together"
with persons who do not fall into either category, the only term that
comes to my mind at the moment is "police informer". Aside from that,
a Wizenthal-expert will recall that after the so-called Ableitinger
Affair became public our crook vigorously denied any such "working
together"with the police, and justified himself by claiming that he
had only requested some trivial information.

"The Paraguayan dictator did not want
to annoy quite as many American senators as had promised me their
support." (JNV p. 111.)

It takes more than a couple of American
senators to frighten a Latin American dictator, since senators do not
wield any private means of power. It takes a quorum in the American
Senate to raise such goosebumps.

But Wizenthal is not lying for a change: the
full-fledged Wizenthalexpert cannot doubt that he and his syndicate
do indeed hold sway over the majority in the Capitol. And now the
statement of an American Representative who described his place of
employment as "Israeli-occupied territory" also suddenly makes sense
to me.

"... with that in mind that I informed
Neal Shaer of the American Office of Special
Investigations..." (JNV p. 112.)

That this wasn't a matter of trading postage
stamps with the statelicensed American "Nazi hunter" is quite clear
to us.

"I therefore lodged a complaint with
the Berlin tribunal, which on 13 June 1979 had just resumed its work
after an interval of eight years." (JNV p. 123.)

Even Berlin tribunals function reliably when
Wizenthal turns up: Judge Wolfgang Neesmann convicted the accused
(Aribert Heim) in absentia. He had acted with murderous
intent, the Court said, and sentenced him to a "fine" of half a
million Deutschmarks, covered by a mortgage on the accused man's
house, in accordance with Wizenthal's motto of "vengeance and money".

293

"`I'm only a newspaperman,' Farnsworth
replied, `and I know no more than you do about these legal matters.
All I know is that the press is a power in the USA. If you can prove
what you've just told me (but of course...) and I write an
article about it, the pressure of public opinion will put the proper
authorities into action ...."' (JNV p. I
50.)

And in the very next sentence Wizenthal's
newspaperman explains just what exactly he takes "proof' to mean:

"`Write down for me everything that
woman is charged with. We'll send a reporter to her, and then a story
will be published ....'" (JNV p. I 50.)

No-one could expose more precisely than
Wizenthal himself does here the criminal Wizenthalian methods and the
no less criminal role assigned to the American press in particular.

"But the American press did not let
go. It kept pestering the INS with the question of what it was doing
in the Braunsteiner case. " (JNV p. I 52.)

Comment superfluous.

"The street where the Ryans (Mr.
and Mrs. Ryan, Braunsteiner case) lived became the scene of
demonstrations, mainly by young people, but also by people curious to
see how a woman accused of such terrible crimes now
lived." (JNV p. I 53.)

We have already found that Wizenthal
organizes demonstrations worldwide, by telephone, to supplement his
manhunts. The fact that he does so not only outside embassies, but
also outside the homes of his victims, and thus involves even their
innocent family members in this street terrorism, shows him to be the
sadistically-inclined criminal which this book, for the first time
ever, exposes him to be.

Admittedly he has not - probably out of
caution - acknowledged himself as the causative agent of these
demonstration, as he has in other cases. But anyone who has the power
to unleash such demonstrations worldwide must also be credited with
the reciprocal ability to stop demonstrations when they turn into
violence and terror aimed at innocent people.

Wizenthal, who even reports gleefully about
these excesses, clearly considers them expedient and is thus the
compelling and obvious suspect.

He is just as compellingly and obviously a
suspect in the grave crime which he recounts almost playfully but
without a word of regret in the very next sentence:

"A few hotheads manufactured a bomb,
but set it off in front of the wrong house, so that the home of some
totally uninvolved person was wrecked." (JNV p. I 53.)

294

Wizenthal himself keeps adding new names to
the roster of individuals and institutions serving as errand boys for
his unlawful manhunt:

"The American consul in Henna, Mr.
Longo, called at my office and brought a list of witnesses who gave
evidence in the Braunsteiner trial in I 949." (JNV p. I
53. )

"It was to be three years before the
public prosecutor Flick left for Israel to take up my
suggestion." (JNV p. I 52.)

It is impossible to miss Wizenthal's outrage
at public prosecutor Flick's unconscionable tardiness in travelling
abroad to receive orders - instead of "taking up" Wizenthal's
"suggestions" with all due haste!

" I had been preparing a book to argue
against this expiry of legal responsibility, and requested Kennedy to
contribute to it. He replied with a telegram which consisted of only
five words: `Moral duties have no terms."' (JNV p. 158.
)

Public prosecutor Flick of Graz could have
taken Kennedy's zeal as an example.

"...to mobilize some MPs with whom I
was personally acquainted, such as Greville Janner and Winston
Churchill (the grandson of tire legendary Prime
Minister) in London." (JNV p. 162. )

The helpful hands assisting in Wizenthal's
hunts never rest.

"My friend Axel Springer actually
arranged an audience for me with the Bavarian Minister President. The
date was Friday, 13 March, three weeks before the vote .... I
succeeded in making Franz Josef Strauss see..." (JNV p.
163.)

We don't know for certain from whom power
proceeds in the West German "democracy"; we only know for certain
that it does not proceed from the people! The consequences which
Wizenthal's conversation with Strauss had, must have made quite an
impression on that Bavarian politician. Wizenthal triumphantly
recounts the results:

"The vote was taken on 3 July: with a
majority of 255 against 222 the German Bundestag decided to rescind
the statute of limitations for murder and accessory to murder. Eleven
of the votes against limitation came from Strauss's CSU."
(JNV p. 163.)

295

"I invited a journalist from Vision, a
magazine widely read both in South America and the United States, and
told him what I knew about Kutschmann." (JNV p. 170.)

"About that time, in May 1975, the
Minster of Justice of BadenWfrttemberg, Dr. Bender, undertook a
journey to Poland. He was accompanied by Dr. Adalbert Rückerl,
the head of the Central Office of the Land judiciary in Ludwigsburg,
my long-time friend, who was to search for documents in the Polish
archives." (JNV p. 170.)

What a blissful working environment Szymon
Wizenthal's must be. We never hear about superiors or subordinates,
only about friends. But these are by no means pals from his early
school days - no, they are spread throughout the world and always
hold positions useful in helping to solve crimes. Not perchance the
crimes against Germans after 1945 which claimed six million lives,
and not the crimes of the anti-Fascist powers whose death toll this
century includes 90 to 100 million civilians of all peoples and
nations (cf. p. ), but - driven by an odd sense of justice - only
crimes restricted to Jewish victims.

In the course of their disgusting trip, it
did not occur to the two dehumanized Germans Dr. Bender and Dr.
Ruckerl to search for the murderers of the two million women and
children who lost their lives during the expulsion, on the wishes of
the American Imperium.

"The head of the South American
section of the Anti-Defamation League, Rabbi Morton Rosenthal,
thereupon requested an audience in order to draw the president's
attention to the Kutschmann case... Simultaneously, my friend
Eliot Welles, head of the Nazi crimes Department of the
AntiDefamation League (terrorist group of the Jewish Masonic
lodge B'nai B'rith) in the USA, declared himself willing, on his
trip to Europe, to call on the public prosecutor's office in
Berlin..." (JNV p. 172. )

"That very day I wrote a letter to the
Israeli police department... to inquire whether any witnesses'
statements were already in existence .... Simultane ously I sent a
letter to the Canadian ambassador in Vienna, Norman Berlis..."
(JNV p. 203. )

296

"On 27 March 19681 informed the
Austrian and foreign press. Reactions were appropriate: in the Dutch
parliament a question was asked..." (JN V p. 248.)

Once, however, Wizenthal encountered an
uncooperative person, and I assume that this rebel may quite possibly
have been assigned to early retirement as a result. Since the Hamburg
prosecutor general, not knowing that Wizenthal would stop by, was
absent from his office, Wizenthal had to make do with an uninformed
deputy, who behaved in a most insubordinate manner. But let's let
Wizenthal tell us the story himself:

"When I mentioned a search at the Red
Cross, he merely reacted with a rhetorical question: `Why not also at
the archbishop's?"` (JNV p. 249.)

Wizenthal certainly does not lack
self-confidence. He wouldn't hesitate to search the premises of the
Pope himself if the Swiss Guard weren't there.

"The file had been transferred to
Vienna, but tile `enclosure', Hofle, had been overlooked. I
approached the chief of the Vienna prosecutor's office, Court
Counsellor Mayer-Maly, and he questioned Public Prosecutor Dr. Coca
as to how this oversight could have occurred." (.JNV p.
277.)

When one considers how long it can take
before a lawyer or an accused is given access to a file and how long
it takes for a public prosecutor to familiarize himself with a case,
it is amazing to see how quickly Wizenthal gained access to the court
documents. If you, dear reader, should ever be embroiled in a
political trial in Austria and misplace your trial documents, give
Wizenthal a call. He'll have them for sure.

In any case, if one takes Wizenthal's own
accounts at face value, the haste to which Wizenthal can inspire
public prosecutors in Austria and Germany - without even being
legally authorized to issue directives - should suffice to make any
Minister of Justice with such authority grow pale with envy.

Wizenthal exaggerates. The fact that he
excepts Austria from the so-called civilized world follows from
another remark he makes in the same chapter, where he admits that
here in Austria he has "the image of an implacable avenger" - but
then we have never suspected this bogus "ethnic German" of being
pro-German anyhow.

But in India, China, Japan and Egypt as
well, the outrage of the "civilized" was also kept to such modest
bounds that one cannot help but

297

think that the aforementioned outrage was
actually restricted to Wizenthal and his network.

Wizenthal then recounts a grave insult to
his person; he tells us:

"By mere chance I learned that the
legal adviser of the World Jewish Congress, Eli Rosenbaum, had been
visiting Vienna - allegedly even twice - without visiting me or even
telephoning me." (JNV p. 311.)

You, dear reader, will probably not be able
to empathize with Wizenthal's outrage. After all, Rosenbaum didn't
call you either.

I have always been convinced that one day,
when the fog over the so-called Anti-Waldheim Campaign lifts, the
Wizenthal Mafia will undoubtedly appear. And he that disperses the
fog for us now is none other than our blusterer Wizenthal himself:

"My friend Peter Michael Lingens
published an exceedingly well-balanced commentary in `profil:... did
not thereby manifest any deep ties with Nazism but probably just a
certain opportunism." (JNV p. 312-313.)

So much for the balance of the Jewish
journalist Peter Michael Lingens, Wizenthal's ex-secretary and the
son of Mother Lingens, Wizenthal's most assiduous witness, who
affirmed in numerous trials that she had seen everything and been
involved everywhere. But how son Peter, chief editor of the Austrian
news magazine Profil, got his information - well, that can
only have been through channels from Wizenthal's circle of
eager-beaver friends.

"The editors of `profll :.. eventually
discovered that the New York Times was in possession of a voluminous
Waldheim dossier which it would shortly start publishing."
(JNV p. 312.)

So a closer examination of the Waldheim
Hunting Party brings us familiar faces and techniques: besides
Wizenthal's ex-secretary, the son of Wizenthal's ex-witness, the
Wizenthal-friendly New York Times now makes its appearance and
passes its secret dossiers on to the Austrian metastasis Profil.
And once again it's a journalist who takes the role of agent
provocateur on behalf of the Wizenthal syndicate, and helps to
take Kurt Waldheim, the Austrian presidential candidate, for a skate
on thin ice.

Wizenthal informs us that the WJC is an
insignificant organizations. An association, in other words, that
should be out of place in this chapter about Jewish power:

"The WJC - in spite of its grandiose
name no more than a small Jewish organization of inferior
importance..." (JNV p. 315. )

But the old crook forgets what he wrote just
a few pages back:

298

"...if the World Jewish Congress had
not started up the machinery of its long prepared campaign a few days
later." (JNV p. 313.)

If an association that is able to trigger a
worldwide campaign against a presidential candidate from Austria is
really just of inferior importance among the whole of Jewish
organizations, as Wizenthal tells us, then what all are the truly
powerful organizations who represent Jewry worldwide in a position to
do?

An interesting note from Wizenthal's
personal rave tabloid Profil which also contains a revealing
quotation shows that Szymon is no less willing to admonish actual
heads of state. Regarding the Croatian head of state, we read:

"Tudjman claims that in his
statistical overview, Raul Hilberg, the Jewish historian of the
'Final Solution'. stated 'that of 5,100,000 victims, 900,000 have
been proven to have died.'

"Wiesenthal: 'If I had been aware of
this quotation sooner, I would have prevented Tudjman's being
received by Chancellor Kohl!"' (Profil, July 29,
1991.)

Well, such things will be said, and
Wizenthal will be unable to prevent anything. The attempt to treat
the Croatian President like an Austrian Revisionist shows the
stubborn old man even in his lifetime that his virtuosity has limits.

"Waldheim, who had become UN Secretary
General upon Kreisky's proposal, had in that post simply followed the
policy which is propagated by the `Sun King' to this day: the prime
objective of Austria's Middle East policy is not security or
recognition for the state of Israel, but... the establishment of a
Palestinian state. His friendship with Gaddafi and Arafat did not
make him especially popular in the USA. " (JNV p.
317.)

Here Wizenthal carelessly reveals the real
reasons for the years-long, world-wide incitement against the
Austrian President Kurt Waldheim, and he is the first and only one
ever to do so clearly and concisely.

At the same time he fails to realize that
the above quotation permits the conclusion that this global media war
against a democratically elected head of state was initiated not only
by some association of inferior importance, but by the entire
Israeli-American Imperium, deliberately and out of athirst for
vengeance against the former UN Secretary General.

One notices that the Waldheim Campaign was
planned along exactly the same lines and implemented with the same
means and by the same persons as the hunts for the other so-called
"German war criminals" were. Here too we have the attempt to wear the
victim down with a world-wide media

299

campaign, and we also have the attempt to
support an accusation by means of forged documents - the exception
being that Wizenthal acted surprised at first; as an Austrian citizen
he did not want to run the risk of being the wirepuller right there
on the scene (in Viennese cafes patrons already spit at Wizenthal's
feet - see JNV p. 139) and for that reason he and the people from
Profil "took a balanced, neutral line at first" and only later
switched over to the course taken by the worldwide mob. Also, the
purpose of this campaign was only to discredit Waldheim, namely as
revenge for his having actualized Kreisky's Middle East policy in the
UN (the Palestinians' right to self-determination), so that Wizenthal
could magnanimously dispense with his famous incriminating witnesses
and the charge of individual, publicly committed murder, namely, the
allegation that the Wizenthal Victim had gunned down a little Jewish
boy with his service pistol on a German railway platform.

Why Wizenthal caused the downfall of
Walter Lüftl, an academically accredited engineer, the President
of the Austrian Association of Engineers, the elected representative
of 4,000 Austrian architects and construction engineers, and sworn
court expert.

Shortly before the trial against me and my
book Freispruch für Hitler? commenced (April-May 1992),
the Austrian press falsely claimed that academically accredited
engineer Walter Lüftl, the President of the Austrian Chamber of
Engineers, a man held in the highest esteem both professionally and
as an individual, had slipped me some excerpts from a private report
in which the "gassing" of Jews in the manner described as for the
"Holocaust" was determined to be impossible on scientific grounds.

In fact, the report which I had quoted had
not originated with a sworn Austrian court expert for engineering
matters, but with an expert on chemistry. Anything else would have
been irreconcilable with the care I, and Revisionist in general, take
in our work, and I would not have based my thesis disproving the
"Holocaust" on it.

However - and in this regard one cannot
argue with the press reports - it is a fact that the report I
consulted did describe all three killing methods alleged for the
"Holocaust" as scientifically untenable.

1. Regarding "bottled carbon monoxide",
the report states:

"Asphyxiation with bottled CO is
technical nonsense. CO would have been very expensive to bottle in
high-pressure steel bottles, and even more expensive to transport.
What person intending to commit industrial-style mass murder will
produce CO industrially in large quantities when any gasoline powered
engine (Otto engine) that is `poorly' tuned (i.e. welltuned for the
given purpose) and run in idle will turn a single liter of gasoline
into many cubic meters of exliaust without oxygen but with 8, 10, 15
or even 20% CO, on-site and cheaply, and with only a fraction of
the fuel needed just to transport the gas bottles?

"To repeat: the Nazis may have been
criminals, but they were surely not so stupid as to waste a hundred
liters of gasoline on the delivery of a quantity of CO which they
could easily have produced on-site from a single liter of
gasoline."

305

2. Zyklon B:

Regarding Zyklon B, the expert chemist took
the position that it could have been used successfully only for the
purpose intended by its inventors, namely disinfestation
(disinfection), but not for the mass killing of human beings, and for
the following reasons:

Zyklon B releases its hydrogen cyanide
content slowly, over the course of many hours. That is its
purpose.

To kill human beings in only a few
minutes, such large quantities of Zyklon B would have to have been
used that sixty times the lethal amount of gas would still have been
released over the course of many hours after the actual gassing was
already over. This would have made it impossible to conduct the
"gassings" in rapid sequence or to empty the "gas chambers" in
between, as it is alleged to have been done.

3. The "gas van" diesel
engines:

Regarding death caused by diesel exhaust
- which Wizcnthal also postulates for Auschwitz, in contradiction of
all official accounts - the expert determined that, unlike exhaust
from gasoline-powered engines, diesel exhaust is absolutely useless
for homicidal purposes. For one thing, it does not contain sufficient
quantities of carbon monoxide (CO), the poison; for another, diesel
exhaust contains so much oxygen that it would be virtually impossible
to suffocate in it.

In fact, among the numerous suicides by
automobile exhaust recorded to date, not so much as one case is known
to have been done with diesel exhaust.

The expert comes to the conclusion that all
the confessions of the accused as well as all post-1945 eyewitness
testimonies which allege the "industrial-style mass murder" in the
Third Reich by gas in any of the three ways described in "Holocaust"
theory must, for whatever reason, be false, since they contradict the
laws of nature.

48 hours after the media campaign against
the President of the Austrian Chamber of Engineers began, that
gentleman had to resign his position, under the pressure exerted by
the political forces of his professional representation whose biased
efforts he himself, as nonpartisan President, had for a brief time
thwarted by virtue of his own irreproachable conduct of office.

I cannot rule out that said President,
academically accredited engineer Lüftl, may have based his
findings on similar or perhaps even the same documents as I had.

306

Shortly before the German original of this
book was published, I learned from a court summons (which I received,
calling me to serve as witness) that preliminary proceedings had been
instituted against the former President of the Chamber of Engineers -
for the "resumption of National Socialist activities".

The Knesset's 1992 "Nazi hunt" in Austria
was intended to get at Haider.

The SPÖ (Social Democratic Party of
Austria) as a branch of the American secret service CIA.

Wizenthal gives the domestic and foreign
press the "green light" to attack Haider.

The "Allied collaboration" - i.e. the
leftist American lobby in Austria - steps up for the final
battle.

Since Jörg Haider, the Chairman of
Austria's Liberal Party, had publicly declared that the Austrians are
part of the German nation, since he had pointed out the
extraordinarily positive employment policy in the Third Reich, and
since he had described the immigration of foreigners as posing the
same danger to the Austrian national identity that I already
perceived 20 years ago in this deliberate process, a campaign against
him has become evident in Austria in which the major newspapers in
the other industrialized nations of the Western word also
participate. In essence it began with a small press release in autumn
1991 ("HALT" reported on it in early 1992) which indicated
that the Knesset, in other words the Israeli Parliament. had decided
to declare war on "right-wing extremism" in Europe, and particularly
in Austria.

An outrageous decision, when one considers
not only that Israel repeatedly includes right-wing extremist parties
in its government but also that this state can itself be described at
best as "National Socialist in the Jewish interest": its unique
racial laws, veiled as religion, and its "zero solution" in matters
of refugees and immigration (only Jews may immigrate to Israel), and
even its left-most party spectrum fall into this category. Religious
intolerance is equal to racial intolerance: to date not so much as
one Christian, Muslim, Buddhist or Hindu has been permitted to
immigrate to Israel, much less a Mormon, a Ludendorfer or a
fire-worshiper. Israel's xenophobia is boundless.

Shortly after the aforementioned resolution
of the Knesset, the standard media campaign was followed by the
conviction of publisher Walter Ochensberger. He was sentenced to
three years in prison. A few weeks later, various youth groups were
accused of having stockpiled weapons in order to carry out a coup.
More than 30 people were arrested, of which 29 had to be released
again for lack of any weapons stockpiles or coups. The one who

309

still remains under arrest is now to undergo
psychiatric treatment, since he too has turned out not to be an
insurgent...

During the media preparations against the
70-year-old former front-line soldier and publisher Fritz Rebhandl,
who had to push his paralyzed wife along before him in a wheelchair
when he went to court for his beliefs, some particularly
short-sighted functionaries of the Liberal Party still believed that
the campaign was not primarily directed against them. In fact, the
Liberal Party, in order to emphasize its anti-Nazi stance, had voted
in favor of the new Wizenthalian law regarding Auschwitz - probably
to prove their ability to govern. This good behavior, some
functionaries reasoned, would buy their own safety, and all that was
still needed now was to distance oneself from the various arrested
and accused (regardless whether one knew them or not) by calling them
fools, sectarians, or "the dregs of society".

But they had grossly underestimated the aims
behind the Knesset's resolution: for the ostracizing and branding
spree could not stop outside the Liberal Party's gates, if for no
other reason than the fact that this campaign had been conceived
precisely because of their leader Jörg Haider's incredible
electoral success, and was to be carried through primarily against
his party, faithful to all the rules and with the aid of all the
apparatus that had already proved its effectiveness in the
Anti-Waldheim Campaign and the war crimes trials.

Wizenthal gives the green light.
Target: Haider.

Acting as the flagship to initiate the
hostilities, Wizenthal made use of his house publication Profil (July
6, 1992):

"A few days ago I participated in an
international conference in Paris and was asked by the participant..
and non-European nations about the political situation in Austria And
I found that Austria is not being judged by... but by Jörg
Haider."

That, of course, obliged Wizenthal to act
quickly: A man who has the support of one-quarter of Austria's
population, a man who is not willing to bow to the forcibly imposed
immigration process nor to accept even the crudest falsifications of
history, cannot but be a cause for alarm in Szymon Wizenthal's
"overseas world". The United States in particular tremble on
Wizenthal's orders - even though, as we have learned, they have such
an accurate perception of Austria that they frequently confuse our
country with that of the kangaroo. .

310

With the following example, Wizenthal
explained to the naive reporters how one might get control of
Haider:

"In the late 1960s there was a
Lebanese attorney named Baroudi, who represented Saudi Arabia at the
UN. In his addresses and reports to the UN he indulged in barrages of
abuse and a flood of false accusations against the US, against Israel
and the West.

"At first the newspapers tried to
polemicize this in editorials... The four largest papers in the
United States, tile 'New York Times'. 'Washington Post'. 'Los Angeles
Times' and 'Chicago Tribune', then decided to simply take no further
notice of this man's appearances before the UN... A few months later,
Saudi Arabia sent a different ambassador..." (Profil, July
6, 1992, p. 7. )

This clandestine arrangement between the
four largest dailies of the world's mightiest alleged "democracy"
amounts to a conspiracy against their readership. Thanks to
Wizenthal's need to tell what he knows - a need that is evidently
growing stronger as he himself grows older - we now learn even these
sorts of details first-hand. With regard to Haider, Wizenthal
suggests:

"Wouldn't that be possible in our case
as well?"

But the wall of silence that was to be built
up around Haider did not hold for long - primarily because the
Austrian media world includes aconservative newspaper (Kronen-Zeitung)
which the Jewish-AmericanImperium
has as yet failed to bring under its control, and which may beregarded as the paper with the world's largest
circulation - with 2.7 millionreaders, based on the country's population.
This paper persisted in givingbalanced
coverage.

On September 10, 1992 Wizenthal's patience
was obviously at an end: in a full-page article, the Kurier - the
American Imperium's flagship in Austria, under the leadership of
an old acquaintance, editor Dieter Lenhardt (cf chapter "Wizenthal's
Revenge") - launched a media attack. The same issue also reviewed a
book authored by another Kurier editor, Hans Henning
Scharsach; in truly bad taste it is titled Haiders Kampf,
and is intended to push the leader of the Austrian Liberal
Party into the grasp of that National Socialist Prohibitive Law that
had been forced through Parliament by Wizenthal, with the help of
Haider's party, just shortly before.The

Kurier (September 10, 1992, p. 5)
wrote:

"The leader of the Labor Party in the
European Parliament, Englishman Clyn Ford, says what Europe's
parliamentarians had only dared whisper to each other to
date:

"'The fact that Jörg Haider and
people like him hold higher offices causes the politicians of the
European Community to doubt that Austria is ready to become a member
state...'

"The international media response to
Haider's rise to power is devastating. "'Nostalgia for Nazi regime.'
(Liberation, Paris)

And to wrap things up, the Jewish
philosopher Sir Karl Popper is also brought into play. In the news
magazine Spiegel he diagnoses, wittily and as requested:

"Haider's ideal is
Hitler."

Nothing beats a multi-purpose intellectual
who can be turned from a philosopher into Wizenthal's domestic and
fortune-teller with only a few minor touch-ups.

In this campaign against the Austrian
politician Haider we may observe a subsection of the rogues' gallery
of the media mafia that stands ever at the ready to beat down the
American Imperium's opponents throughout the world.

Who supports Wizenthal in
Austria?

The family tree of the SPÖ (Austria's
Social Democratic Party) and the newspaper Kurier.

The coup of the century, during which eight
unqualified individuals gained unlawful access to parliamentary
debates in the guise of "constitutional lawyers" etc. (cf. p. ,
chapter "Wizenthal's Revenge"), could not have succeeded without
insider accomplices. The Austrian Minister of Justice Michalek who,
according to the protocol, was present at these discussions, is
suspected of having made this scandal possible because only he was in
a position to nominate the committee members for the
debate.

312

The SPÖ - a tool of the
CIA.

The scales fall from our eyes when we
consult university lecturer Dr. Reinhold Wagnleitner's book
Coca-Colonisalion and kaller Krieg, published in 1991 by the
(leftist) "Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik". This highly
important work of post-war history documents for us the shocking
scenario of American cultural aggression against Central Europe. As
early as 1942, in other words before the allegations of "gassings"
were raised, this prograrn of cultural aggression, which was provided
for the event of an American victory, had as its aim the separation
of the German people (in Austria as well) from their cultural roots,
and their forcible indoctrination into American education, the
American view of history, and American culture. with the aid of
psychology specialists of the American Army. The program of
multicultural immigration that has been forced on us for over 20
years now is evidently a component part of this aggression, which
aims at eliminating Germany's and Europe's ethnic intactness in the
interests of the Imperium. For example, we learn (Wagnleitner, p.
226) that it has been part of the American Imperium's goals from the
beginning to break even the preeminence of German music in the world.
In Austria, the US Army, and first and foremost the CIA, made use of
the Austrian labor movement (not the conservative People's Party) to
assist in their criminal cultural rape of the German
people.

Reinhold Wagnleitner writes:

"In this process, the Social
Democratic parties can be... virtuallyconsidered to be allied partners of
the CIA." (Coca-Colonisolion, p. 78.)

Wagnleitner is even more open on p.
91:

"Certain messages were even repeatedly
and successfully introduced into the speeches of Austrian members of
the government and of other politicians "

Wagnleitner's book documents that the
entire country was placed in an invisible choke-hold of American
cultural aggression, which keeps the media, education, art,
publishing and the book trade under its control.

In this book I have repeatedly
referred to the newspaper Kurier as an instrument of
Wizenthal's campaigns. I remind the reader again that its editor
Dieter Lenhardt was part of the Wizenthalian invasion of Parliament.
and that the campaign against Haider, the media attacks on Waldheim,
and the propaganda in the cases of Revisionists and so-called "war
criminals" began with the Kurier. The Kurier's former
editor-in-chief Hugo Portisch, who was trained in the United States
as an agent of "American indoctrination" and

313

was even nominated in 1991 (by Kztrier
editor Hans Rauscher) as Federal President, knew very well what
points counted when he reapplied to the Kurier after returning
from the States:

"My most important duties included...
combating Nazi teachings... and to work towards unconditional
cooperation with the West. In numerous articles I also familiarized
the Austrian reading public with the lifestyle, politics and the
leading personalities of the USA."

Anyone who has read Wagnleitner's book
knows, at least as of this point, that Austrian society remains
interwoven by a cultural network, insinuated by American agents into
the areas mentioned, so that Austria must be considered as territory
occupied by the American Imperium to this day.

That Wizenthal was installed in Austria
by the same power and at the same time is clear beyond any doubt. The
numerous interconnections mentioned in this book also indicate this.
In my opinion, however, his task was not to engage in criminological
research but in worldwide anti-German propaganda for which National
Socialism only serves as an excuse and the instrumentalization of the
"Holocaust" only as a vital prop. Similarly, the Institute for
Contemporary History (formerly the Institute for the Prosecution of
Nazi War Criminals) and the Documentary Archives of the Austrian
Resistance (DOW) under the leadership of the informer Dr. Wolfgang
Neugebauer (originator of 600 criminal charges against fellow
citizens) must be regarded as cooperating and facilitating
vessels in the great theatrical staged by the CIA.

Why Kreisky failed.

Bruno Kreisky's term as Chancellor dislodged
the CIA's power over Austria from the official chambers of the
government and the SPÖ party headquarters, and forced it for
years to make do with makeshift quarters in newspaper offices or to
bunk with left-wing extremist groups and the sects of contemporary
historians and their documentary archives. In his time Dr. Kreisky
put a stop to Szymon Wizenthal's activities and prohibited the
manhunter from presuming to act as an instrument of the Austrian
judiciary. He described Wizenthal as a man with whom he was familiar
from "unsavorv secret service reports": Kreisky also noted
that Wizenthal "had a different relationship with the Gestapo" than
he himself had had, but the Chancellor was referring to Wizenthal's
odd travel habits; according to Wizenthal's own claims, he had toured
12 concentration camps as inmate between 1941 and

314

1945. But Kreisky's statement that he was
familiar with Wizenthal frorn "unsavory secret service reports"
surely was no reference to the Gestapo, but to those files to which
the Chancellor's Ministry of the Interior actually had access:
namely, to Szymon Wizenthal's contacts to the American secret
service CIA and, as follows logically, to the Israeli secret service
Mossad.

Public awareness of the infiltration of the
Austrian labor movement by American agents and this movement's links
to the American secret service CIA, which was only briefly
interrupted by Kreisky's time in office, should make the other
parties in the Austrian parliament consider it their foremost task to
exclude the SPÖ from government responsibilities and to purge
all traces of American cultural aggression in Austria from the areas
of education, historiography, music, the fine arts, literature and
poetry, as well as in publishing and the media.

At that point, Szymon Wizenthal, that
Restitution Fraud who is such an important psychological part of this
American cultural aggression against Austria, will also be refused
continued rights of residence in our country.

Austria's hope - and yes, Germany's as well
- is Jörg Haider. Will he be equal to the task of breaking the
Imperium's power in Austria?

In October 1992, just before the German
original of this book went to press, Wizenthal once again presented
the Austrian public with a classic "case": that of Dr. Egon
Sabukoschek, the retired chief of a dental office in Graz.

The entire spectrum of criminal machinations
characteristic of Wizenthal's modus operandi plays out in slow
motion for us to observe.

As always, Wizenthal begins his hunt with a
press conference, thus setting himself apart from real criminologists
who would never engage in such unlawful theatrics, partly out of
consideration for their own research but also partly out of respect
for the extant system of laws which forbid the pre-trial conviction
of an accused.

Again we are expected to believe that a kind
and generous man, well respected for over half a century, mutated
into a raging beast for a very specific period of time, contrary to
all criminological experiences in this regard. Again we see the media
campaign with which we have already become familiar ad nauseam.
Again, the Austrian justice system keeps its embarrassed silence,
failing to protest against the "pre-conviction".

Again it is the newspapers Prnrl and
Kurier, the most loyal chargers in the stable of the American
Imperium in Austria, who are to get the victim ready for slaughter.
And already, the witnesses with their phenomenal powers of
recollection are arriving at the airport. From Israel. Organized by
Wizenthal.

This time, the (perhaps already senile?)
"academically accredited engineer" throws all caution to the wind.
And he finds a soul-mate in the examining magistrate from Graz, Karl
Buchgraber: this hot-headed antiFascist sentences the accused to
pre-trial detention, against the wishes of the public prosecutor's
office - a measure "unusual in the history of Austrian
jurisprudence", and "extremely controversial", according
to the KronenZeitung of October 15, 1992.

With Buchgraber's help, Wizenthal can
finally make unrestrained use of the Austrian justice system as a
fig-leaf for his gangster methods:

322

He drives the well-prepped witnesses up
in his own car, escorts them personally to be questioned, and is even
allowed to attend these hearings - perhaps so that he can prompt the
witnesses if they forget some of their lines.

Yes, Austria under Vranitzky has indeed
become a playground for criminals of our Galician fraud's stripe.

The trainer of the Jewish false witness
gang already leads his domestics into the arena by hand.

Where witnesses fail to work out as
expected, it doesn't matter much to Wizenthal. Replacements are easy
to come by. In the Kronen-Zeitung of October 15, 1992 we read
in amazement:

"Three further witnesses have turned
up in Israel." (Well, where else?)

Those witnesses, whose numbers Wizenthal can
vary as needed, "miraculously" survived the mass executions, and
after half a century they are not only able to recognize their victim
without problems but can also recite from memory the names and
service ranks of all the nineteen-year-old privates of that time.
Unlike others, these witnesses have not succumbed to the consequences
of old age, cancer, heart attack or stroke.

They are present. All of them. And they
testify.

The ritual, individual and public murder of
a little child, which Wizenthal alleges against the highest
SS-leaders, lock, stock and barrel, won't be far off now in this case
either.

It's strange that our ethnic German
expellees, our mothers and grandmothers, never knew the names of
their rapists and their Jewish commanders, and that those of our
prisoners-of-war who, unlike their comrades, survived the Yugoslav
"marches of atonement", do not know the names and ranks of their
tormentors, never did know them, and also no longer recall the faces
of those who murdered their comrades.

After daring to object and to criticize the
examining magistrate Buchgraber, the public prosecutor is whistled
back into line by the highest echelons: by the Austrian Minister of
Justice Michalek, after he had received a visit from - guess who? -
his "friend" Szymon Wizenthal (cf. KronenZeitung, Vienna).

The Serbian-Jewish journalist Alexander Lebl
was allowed to come from "Yugoslavia", which no longer even existed
at that time, in order to recognize and identify the old man whom he
had allegedly known as 20year-old Egon Sabukoschek.

Here it is necessary to explain: it wasn't
just by chance that Wizenthal and his team picked a victim who had
been only 20 years old at that time.

323

And it also wasn't just by chance that the
file which served as the foundation for this case came from
"Yugoslavia" (like in the Waldheim case as well).

Since those officers who had really held
posts of responsibility had been around age 30, if they are even
still alive today they are over 80 and thus getting to be quite rare.
Wizenthal must therefore satisfy his desires with the younger
generations. For this reason his victims are getting younger and
younger, and the photographs from the time of their "crime" (cf. p. )
are looking increasingly juvenile. If Wizenthal goes on like this, it
won't be long before the Austrian public prosecutors will find
themselves summoning the Hitler Youth's equivalent of Boy Scouts to
be tried for war crimes.

Wizenthal's orchestration is downright
brilliant: he makes clever use of the current anti-Austrian political
mood in Serbia. He knows full well that the old Communists in
Belgrade, who consider themselves guardians of that Yugoslav state
which the Western Allies forced on the Balkans, are more determined
than ever these days to do Austria harm.

At the time of Sabukoschek's arrest, the
sympathy which the Austrians had expressed for the Croats' and the
Bosnians' freedom fight against the Serbs had engendered powerful
anti-Austrian sentiments in what remained of the Yugoslav state.
Furthermore, nowhere have more war-time testimonies and confessions
against Germany and German soldiers been generated by extortion than
here. From the former Federal President Kurt Waldheim we know that in
this Yugoslav state virtually every German soldier was either accused
of being a war criminal, or forced with torture and threats of death
to testify to "war crimes" of his comrades. Szymon Wizenthal, the man
with the anti-Austrian (anti-German) mission, knows well how to
exploit that.

This is how it could come about that the
country whose soil is soaked with the blood of 150,000 murdered
ethnic Germans and 100,000 butchered German prisoners of war, whose
martyrdom has never yet been avenged in even one single case, could
give rise to audacious Jewish false witnesses who can simply waltz up
and tell their lies while feeling perfectly safe from lawful arrest
and execution which collaboration with the criminals of Tito's regime
would seem to require under normal circumstances - and why a
degenerate Austrian examining magistrate can wait with impunity for
"documents" from Yugoslavia.

This case shows like none other what
Wizenthal's sense of justice is really about: he is only too well
aware of the treatment of prisoners and thus also of how the 40,000
"war crimes files" came about. Wizenthal knows that Tito's Yugoslavia
was a criminal nation unparalleled in its quality and nature. He is
fully aware that in the country from which he now obtains his

324

"evidence" and the key witness for his
endeavor of "justice", "no prisoners were taken" during World
War Two (cf. JNV p. 91), in other words, that all captured German
soldiers were murdered on the spot! The figurehead of the "Holocaust"
and of "justice" thus collaborates with a system which made the
murder of prisoners the norm, and the fabrication of falsified
documents a matter of principle.

But back to the Yugoslav universal genius,
Alexander Lebl:

Serb, Jew, journalist, and witness for the
prosecution - Wizenthal demonstrates for us the endless versatility
of his co-workers. Before donning his witness hat, Lebl - in
assiduous emulation of his master - quickly gives a press conference
of his own in Belgrade, making full use of the anti-Austrian mood
reigning there due to Vienna's support for the Croats' right to
selfdetermination. And he gives a sneak preview of his testimony:

"He was called 'Jew-Commissar in
Gestapo uniform... There are dozens of witnesses for this."

So once again the number of "witnesses" is
variable as needed. From among a hundred executed, dozens of
"witnesses" not only availed themselves of the nauseatingly
overworked "miracle" of surviving the execution but also called on
that selfsame "miracle" again and again to survive deportation to the
death camps, the typhus epidemic there, the alleged zero-ration diet,
and ultimately the "Holocaust", diesel exhaust and all - and are
today "miraculously" not among the 90% of the war-time generation who
have by now succumbed to the effects of old age etc. Nema problema!

That these dozens of survivors (from among
the hundred execution victims) happen to be intimately familiar with
the name, rank and presentday appearance of the man whom they saw for
no more than half an hour more than 50 years ago and who, like all
German "war criminals", evidently introduced himself to them complete
with calling card, is no longer surprising.

If there weren't something odd about the
workings of the Austrian courts, or, to put it differently, if our
justice system applied the same yardstick to Wizenthal Witnesses as
it applies everywhere else, then what we know about this case so far
would suffice to have Wizenthal, examining magistrate Buchgraber, and
the entire line-up of false witnesses who have appeared to date,
arrested and arraigned in court on strong suspicion of perjury and
abuse of office.

But already the air begins to hiss out of
Wizenthal's tires all of its own accord:

a) Sabukoschek turns out to have an ethnic
Jewish background;

325

b) Jewish witnesses for the prosecution
appear and call the accused a life-saver;

c) the accused proves that he was himself
persecuted in the Third Reich;

d) and last but not least, Jewish
personalities speak up publicly against Wizenthal's activities, and
warn of the potential consequences. In this context, Austrian
Parliamentary Representative Alfred Gerstl, a Jew once persecuted for
racial reasons, said:

"In our city neo Nazis are alreaqv
beginning to attack us. " And: "If this fails, then
everything's been no use - coming to terms with our past no less than
our efforts to shape the young generation." (Profit,
October 19, 1992. )

Because there are people like Representative
Gerstl, I believe

a) that Jewish dishonesty and Jewish crime
in our time can best be combated by Jewish honesty and Jewish
decency;

b) Wizenthal has gone to the well once too
often;

c) at the time the German original of this
book went to press, there were many indications that Wizenthal's hunt
for Sabukoschek may have been his last.

Wizenthal's battle for immigration:
against hatred of foreigners in Germany, Austria, and everywhere else
- except in Israel!

Racially motivated attempt to murder
Europe!

Power does not proceed from the people -
it proceeds from the B'nai B'rith.

Wizenthal is all for the unprotesting
acceptance of continued immigration of foreigners into Austria and
the rest of Germany. Why? And who else sides with him?

The leading role played by Jewish
personalities in the crimes of Communism, the crimes of Capitalism,
the murder of six million Germans after the end of World War Two, and
the murder of 100 million civilian victims of "anti-Fascism"
worldwide is a known fact (cf. illustration, p. ) and, in an
inversion of Wizenthal's logic of collective responsibility,
anti-Semitic tendencies may well place the blame for this leading
role on the shoulders of the Jewish people as a whole, without any
differentiation; yet a small, criminal, Jewish clique which holds
almost all the reins of power in its hands is merrily burdening the
collective back of world Jewry with another, even heavier load: the
great genocide of the western world, by means of the deliberately
induced birth deficit and excess immigration.

But the Imperium forgets that every blow
against the Idea of a national state is also a blow against the Idea
of a Jewish state.

Singing in chorus with Galinski/Bubis (of
the Central Council of Jews in Germany), with the B'nai B'rith, with
Austria's Minister Scholten-Pfefferkorn, with Cohn-Bendit
(Frankfurt), Paul Grosz (religious community of Vienna), Daniel
Charim (Austrian Parliament), university lecturer Rainer Munz, with
"Amnesty International", with Dr. Neugebauer of the "Documentary
Archives of the Austrian Resistance", and with all the others, Szymon
Wizenthal joins ranks with almost all of the Imperium's official
representatives to condemn "hatred of foreigners" as it is allegedly
displayed by the German people in Austria and Germany.

He, the world's foremost hatemonger against
all things German, demands that the European nations should be
required by force of penal legislation (against "incitement") to
unprotestingly accept the massive and unparalleled genocide being
committed against them before our very eyes by the deliberate and
controlled birth deficit and by immigration from abroad.

332

Whether it be as prosecutor, as hatemonger,
as false witness or as fabricator of history, everyone plays his
assigned part in the great, concerted search-and-destroy mission
against the German people's continuation as ethnically determinable
factor. Why?

It is popular practice to allege that evil
anti-Semites claim that "the Jews" are the inventors and executors of
the great "migrations" currently churning through Europe, with
Germany as their focal point.

But let's let Wizenthal speak
first:

"The principal ingredient of such
agitation continues to be hatred of foreigners: wherever neo-Fascists
appear - whether in England, France, Austria or in the USA - they
call on the majority to resist `swamping by foreigners'. Swamping by
coloured people... swamping by Yugoslav or Turkish guest workers,
swamping by Mexicans or Puerto Ricans True, the Jews are not
mentioned at the top of the list in these pamphlets - but two
thousand years have proved that they are always the first to be done
to death." (JNV p. 356.)

To me, this comment proves that Wizenthal is
fully aware of the consequences of his actions. How irresponsibly he
acts in the name of Jewry as a whole without being authorized to do
so, how sly, underhanded and twofaced he is in his actions, and how
deceitful is the Jewish power for which he stands, is shown, for
example, by an interview which the horrid old swindler gave his
Austrian-Jewish rave rag Profit:

"Even as we sit here, 800,000 to one
million young Soviets are in danger of losing their Jewish
identity." (Profit, July 29-30, 1988.)

So Wizenthal knows perfectly well how
precious national identity is, and how easily it can be lost (through
integration) when the "closed settlement area", i.e. the national
state, is lacking. And so, even the Jewish people - the only people
in a foreign environment, i.e. without a closed settlement area, who
have nonetheless managed to survive as ethnically defined unit to
this day - are evidently no longer immune to the dangers of
amalgamation in the melting pot of traditionless multiculture. And
Wizenthal himself regards the remigration to Israel by these young
Jewish people in danger of losing their identity as the only
guarantee for their continued existence as Jews, as the context of
the above quotation clearly shows.

This, then, is the sort of "justice" that
Wizenthal means: the preservation of the ethnic identity of the Jews
is good, but the preservation of that of the Germans is bad. The
national state of "the others" must be destroyed by immigration, but
that of the Jews must be preserved and strengthened.

333

If this double-standard fraud on the part of
Wizenthal and the IsraeliAmerican Imperium becomes known - namely.
that non-Jews are punished for "incitement" and "racism" when they
demand the same right which the Jews demand for themselves as a
matter-of-course - then, I am afraid, a worse nightmare than any Jew
ever dreamed may well become ghastly worldwide reality.

The same two-faced depravity and dishonesty
which we see in Wizenthal may also be found in almost all Jewish
organizations and in the state of Israel:

Ethnic demise for the non-Jewish peoples.
A Blood and Soil Program for the Jewish people.

It won't work.

The Jewish Masonic lodge B'nai
B'rith.

In school, children are taught that power
proceeds from the people. Children do believe in fairy tales. This,
however, is one fairy tale which their parents believe in as well. A
fairy tale for adults. in other words. The Jewish Masonic lodge B'nai
B'rith, established in New York in 1843, embodies a part of the power
which determines the political happenings in the Western world,
behind the scenes of governments and democratic institutions. Its
significance by far exceeds the appearance given by its numerical
strength of 500,000 members. The B'nai B'rith enjoys permanent
observer status with the UN, and the fact that it has bestowed medals
on government members and princes of the Church in the Western world
(and especially in Austria and Germany) proves that no path of power
leads pass collaboration with the Jewish Grand Lodge. Wearing the
skullcap of homage to the gross racist goals of the Jewish lodge, our
western politicians and representatives of the Church must eat humble
pie as they shuffle to accept their gruesome decorations.

The Christian newspaper Der
Christenstaal, for example, wrote in its November 1991 issue:

"Thus, the B'nai B'rith lays claim to
tire leadership of all of Jewry worldwide, and in fact all Jewish
organizations have had to submit to this claim.."

The Jewish lodge brothers consistently
demand that the (clearly spineless) German politicians in Central
Europe loudly and unequivocally declare their support of immigration
by foreigners and their opposition to any "hatred of foreigners". The
allegations of a "hatred of foreigners", made against the German
people by American, British and Israeli politicians but

334

also by their German counterparts from
politics and the Church, clearly constitute the crime of incitement
by virtue of their unobjectiveness, deliberate one-sidedness and
malicious intent: in the light of 13,000 Palestinian political
prisoners in Israeli concentration camps, in light of the slaughter
of thousands of teenaged Palestinian demonstrators and the countless
victims of the American race riots in Los Angeles, these allegations
against Germany cannot be credited as factual criticism, only as
political propaganda. Also, given the Israeli race laws, Israel's
"Zero Solution" in matters of refugees and immigration, and the "Iron
Curtain" which the United States have set up to curb immigration from
Mexico, one cannot help the impression that our false friends are
trying to force hemlock down our throats while drinking water
themselves.

To give just one of a hundred possible
examples, I quote the Allgemeine Jtidische Wochenzeitalng of
December 10, 1991, where one Ellen Presser comments on Richard yon
Weizsacker's acceptance of a gold medal (a reward for his efforts to
counter "hatred of foreigners"):

"...Maurice Honigbaum, the European
President of the B'nai B'rith, honored the German head of state for
actualizing the B'nai B'rith's ideals: "...to stand in for human
rights, to oppose discrimination against people, and to help the
victims of political persecution."

As anyone interested in the topic knows, the
true ideals of the B'nai B'rith are very different. The Jewish
publication Die Gemeinde of Vienna clarifies the matter for us
in its issue of September 7, 1990, p. 56:

"Unconditional solidarity with
Israel... became one of the Lodge's objectives...

"It is particularly relevant that,
thanks to Zwi Perez Chajes, the settlement of Eretz Israel
became one of tire rennese Lodge's goals... "

So: not for human rights and against
political persecution, but for political persecution and against
human rights.

Even the Jewish-directed anti-German
propaganda organization "Amnesty International", which may do its
mischief with impunity at the UN and whose funding sources are no
more disclosed than its undemocratic structure based on the
"leadership principle" (central representation in

335

London cannot be voted out of office), has
had to acknowledge (in its 1991 Yearbook, pp. 202-213) how Israel
treats its political prisoners. As mentioned before, 13,000 political
prisoners languish in Israeli concentration camps. Torture, murder,
and violence against children are the order of the day.

These, then, are the true ideals and
objectives of the B'nai B'rith, which this "honorable society"
supports unconditionally!

But the second goal of this allegedly
humanitarian B'nai B'rith lodge is also worth closer examination:
"Eretz Israel".

On February 28, 1991, p. 10, the Austrian
publication Die ganze Woche also enlightens us about this
ideal espoused by the lodge brothers (and cites Genesis 13:14-18, as
well as Deuteronomy 1,7):

"Eretz Israel: the soil of Israel, the
land which the Lord God had promised Abram (Abraham), where the
Jewish people would live:

"The borders are vague and sometimes
determined without context: from the river of Egypt (author's
note: this evidently refers to the Nile) to tile great river
Euphrates(author's note: doesn't that already place
us deep within Iraq, near the Iranian border?) from the desert
to Lebanon."(Author's note: the B'nai B'rith probably
won't be in too much of a hurry for the deserts, but even as I write
this, Israeli troops are once again in Lebanon.)

The idealistic B'nai B'rith lodge and its
prize winners from both Church and State obviously yet have many
things in store for the Middle East.

It will take the expulsion of 30 million
Arabs before this Israel is really as Eretz as the lodge brothers
would like. God bless you, dear Bishop, and you too, dear
Cardinal, and how are you today, Herr President?!

In the context of "hatred of foreigners" it
is instructive to take a closer look at the country to which the
B'nai B'rith lodge is unconditionally devoted, and to which the
German Presidents and Church dignitaries have evidently made their
unconditional surrender!

'Jews are excepted from the ban on
immigration and asylum; Palestinians deprived of their rights are
excepted from the ban on employment of foreigners and must commute
from their "homelands" to work and back every day.

336

Anyone who were to draw up a program such as
Wizenthal, Kohl and Weizsacker, Stecher, Konig and Vranitzky,
together with the B'nai B'rith, have approved for Israel, and demand
it for Germany, would run the risk of Wizenthal, Kohl and Weizsacker,
Stecher, Konig and Vranitzky denouncing him for "neo-Nazi activities"
and being dragged into German political courts for "incitement to
race hatred".

Just imagine the following law, which is
actually in effect in Israel, being demanded for our German people
and Fatherland:

"Immigrants from the Soviet Union must
prove their Jewish ethnicity twice; once to the Israeli consular
delegation in Moscow, where they are issued the Israeli visa, and
again when they receive their Israeli identification papers."
(From the Jewish publication Die Gemeinde, Vienna,
September 7, 1990.)

Have our gentlemen prizewinners never yet
noticed that our immigrants do not need to prove their "German
ethnicity"? What, then, are truly the ideals of the Austrian Bishops,
the German President and the Masonic lodge B'nai B'rith?

Again from the Jewish publication Die
Gemeinde (May 17, 1990) we learn that Israel, and thus the B'nai
B'rith unconditionally devoted to it, understand "immigration" to
mean something other than we take it to mean. The opposite, to be
precise:

"Minister of Integration Perelz
addressed the Ministry of Immigration and the Knesset's Integration
Committee and asked 'whether the intention was to establish a
non-Jewish state?."

As the article in Die Gemeinde shows,
Peretz asked this in outrage at the notion that "quarter Jews" were
to be allowed to immigrate from the Soviet Union. Oh, well, that's
truly outrageous.

We'd already be happy with "one-eighth
Germans".

Our Allied-appointed potentates are
evidently the only ones to observe their own directives: 1992, one of
the darkest years in the German people's history, was rich in
newspaper articles showing us that the same politicians who advocate
immigration of foreigners from all over the world as the cureall for
our national woes seek to restrict the remigration of Germans from
the former Soviet Union with criminal "quotas" evidently prompted by
their masters' racist, anti-German agenda.

Immigration is only good if it serves to
wipe out the German people as an ethnic unit.

337

Is it "Nazi" to be concerned about our
German identity and birth rate?

Wizenthal, the religious community, the
Austrian Bishops, the journalists and the politicians of the Western
world strictly and inexorably condemn as "Nazi", and punish with
criminal legislation, the worries expressed by concerned Germans that
our birth deficit, coupled with foreign immigration and the
immigrants' birth excess, could result in our becoming an ethnic
minority in our own country.

We have been stripped of our right to ethnic
survival. Anyone who does not want Germany to die is suspected of
being "Nazi". We are advised that "the foreigners are people too" -
which no-one has ever doubted, by the way - and that after they
receive their German passports "they're Austrians, Germans etc.
anyway" - which we shall continue to doubt.

If one is not promptly dragged into court
for expressing these concerns, one may consider oneself lucky. These
selfsame people, however, who denounce the people in Central Europe
and the Western world as "xenophobic" and "racist", are full of
sympathy for the right of preservation of national identity, and even
for wildly racist nationalism, when it is their Jews who are at
issue.

Concerning his beloved Israel, Hans
Rauscher, a journalist with the CIAsupported Vienna newspaper
Kurier, showed a kind of insight which he sorely lacks with
regard to Austria:

"The Arab birth rate is considerably
higher than the Israeli. In a short time there will be more Arabs
titan Israelis living under Israeli rule... Is that what the state of
Israel was created for?"

The counterquestion to Rauscher would be:
What was the state of Austria created for?

So Hans Rauscher is concerned by birth
rates and swamping by foreigners - if Jews are at issue. It is
only the concern for our people that he considers Nazi. For
Austria this same journalist continues to advocate the continued
policy of swamping with foreigners against the domestic people's
will, and in articles on this topic he repeatedly urges that
continued immigration should be "ably managed".

Austrian journalist Hans Rauscher has
convinced us of his heart-felt love of Israel and of his deep
concerns for that national state. About the Austrians, however, he
thinks differently:

338

"...all of them let themselves be
drawn into an insane adventure by this Udo Proksch, a crazy and
dangerous i.e. profoundly Austrian character." (Kurier,
January 8, 1989.)

At this point I wish to institute legal
proceedings against Hans Rauscher for the crime of public incitement.

Given criminals of the stripe of B'nai
B'rith lodge brothers and their autochthonous on-site lackeys like
Hans Rauscher, it can be difficult for opponents of the death
penalty, like myself, to remain true to their principles.

Jewish organizations two-faced in the
question of foreigners:

Racial exclusiveness and national state
for Jews - genocide by immigration for non-Jews in Europe and the
Western world.

Our politicians and Church dignitaries
join in.

One example of the deceitfulness of a
dishonest and underhanded middleman for the Israeli-American Imperium
is the (US-educated) "Austrian" Minister of Education Rudolf Scholten
who, against his better knowledge, hurries the genocide in Austria
along in the guise of humanity. On September 21, 1992, for example,
the Wizenthal Accomplice Scholten wrote in our Galician fraud's
favorite paper Profil:

"To me, it is the duty of politics to
keep the admissions capacity(Austria's capacity for
taking in foreigners) reassuringly high, not to let concerns
decrease it further and further."

What this insidious traitor and advocate of
genocide understands by "reassuringly high", and just whom our
national demise (that concerns our people so deeply) is supposed to
reassure, is something the Jew Scholten vulgo Pfefferkorn doesn't
tell us. But from the facsimile on p. one can readily see that he
wants racially and religiously exclusive Jewish schools for Jewish
children rather than the multicultural schools that must do for the
rest of us.

Interim summary:

The Jewish Masonic lodge B'nai B'rith is the
largest and most powerful, global criminal organization. Students are
taught absolutely nothing about the B'nai B'rith in history or
political science classes in school.

The B'nai B'rith's militant vanguard is the
Anti-Defamation League, with which Szymon Wizenthal works together
all over the world.

The B'nai B'rith's objectives
are:

339

a) to maintain Israel as an exclusively
Jewish national state, and to increase its size ten- to twenty-fold,
with the ultimate goal of denying the Palestinians, Syrians, Iraqis,
Jordanians, Egyptians and Lebanese their right to self-determination
for all time, and

b) to destroy the national states of
Europe and the Western world, to deprive the non-Jewish peoples of
their national identities by involving them in massive migrations,
and thereby, to commit an unparalleled crime beside which the
Morgenthau Plan, the 100 million victims of anti-Fascism, and the
atomic bomb attacks practically dwindle to minor charges.

Austrian, German, other European and
American politicians as well as Church dignitaries know this, and by
not only accepting medals but also participating actively, they make
themselves accomplices in this crime of the millennium.

It is beyond the scope of this book to
discuss in detail why the clearly discernible power which I call the
Israeli-American Imperium feels that it can profit from the
extinction of the White peoples, their national states and thus their
closed settlement areas.

My research has found that the insidious
planned genocide-by-migration, which stands behind the worldwide
campaign of the Israeli-American Imperium, is probably motivated by
racist considerations.

The alteration of the German national
character.

Professional informant and forger of
history on the CIA's behalf: Dr. Wolfgang Neugebauer (SPÖ) of
the "Documentary Archives of the Austrian Resistance".

An abominable private association led by a
man named Dr. Wolfgang Neugebauer exists in Austria on taxpayers'
funds. Supported by the SPÖ (Austria's Social Democratic Party),
it is allowed to fabricate a view of history for our country's
students in which the Allies of the Second World War - primarily the
Americans, but the Communists as well - are unconditionally and
uncritically glorified, while the Austrians, and in fact the Germans
as a whole, are condemned and demonized. And the chief

340

characters of this questionable private
association, Dr. Wolfgang Neugebauer and Brigitte Bailer-Galanda,
M.A., are carried on the Vienna community payroll as "civil servants"
and are unlawfully remunerated for their "club activities" with
taxpayers' money.

I don't know their salary arrangement with
the CIA. In any case, I have done my duty with regard to this
incident of corruption and have commissioned my attorney, Dr. Herbert
Schaller, to institute the appropriate criminal proceedings with the
public prosecutor's office of Vienna.

For years, Dr. Wolfgang Neugebauer and
Galanda, M.A. have worked together with Szymon Wizenthal. (For the
interconnections between Neugebauer, Galanda and Wizenthal, see the
chapters "The Waechter Case" car "Wizenthal's Revenge".)

While the Galician has specialized on
alleged "war crimes" (not on American, Soviet or Israeli war crimes,
but on "German war crimes"), Neugebauer targets our people's next
couple of generations by denouncing proGerman-minded people in
Austria to the public prosecutor's office as "Nazis", or by informing
against them in writing to their employers.

To date, this thought crime terrorist has
brought more than 600 criminal charges against his fellow citizens
for their insubordinate views on history. Fully 200 of them have been
directed against me.

From Neugebauer's association, the DOW
("Documentary Archives..."), we have easily gained precise
confirmation of that which the accomplice Wizenthal persists in
denying: namely, that the epigones of the American occupation power
in Austria target their attacks, not on National Socialism (which
only ever serves as an excuse), but on the German people per
se.

A unique, racist, criminal plan, thought up
by people who hypocritically pretend day in, day out to be
"anti-racists" and to stand up against defamation (Anti-Defamation
League) - Mal is the nature and essence of the immigration policies
as we have known them.

Some light is shed on the Imperium's
intentions by a comment made by Neugebauer's DOW on the Morgenthau
Plan, the most massive planned genocide in recorded history, which
provided not only for the everlasting territorial dismemberment of
Germany but also for the physical destruction of umpteen million
German:

"...although the 'Morgenthau Plat:'
included severe punitive elements in its treatment of post-war
Germany... the goal and purpose of this program must not he seen as
revenge and atonement for the atrocities and aggressions perpetrated
by Hiller's Germany, but as an effective and lasting alteration of
the German national character as a whole." (DOW 1991
Yearbook, p. 136.)

341

Now the reason for Wizenthal's and Dr.
Neugebauer's passionate support of the immigration of foreigners into
Austria and the actualization of "multicultural society" is clear:

The goal is to alter the German national
character.

That end justifies any and every means, no
matter how criminal: "guest workers", "refugees", "Basic Law",
"humanity" - these are only the fig leaves behind which the genocidal
anti-German plan has hidden since the 1960s.

In Wizenthal's eyes, the remnants of
democratic structures in Austria are proving to be a great obstacle
standing in the way of the fulfilment of his anti-German mission and
his anti-Austrian machinations: Wizenthal fears the people!

On November 24, 1992 the German newspaper
Die Welt reported that Wizenthal described as "catastrophic"
the Austrian Liberal Party's intent to call for a petition for a
referendum aiming at a moratorium on immigration. He, the Jewish
racist who uncritically supports Israel and its racist laws (Zero
Solution to issues of refugees and immigration; exception: Jews), is
suddenly a passionate supporter of "multiculturalism" when the matter
at stake is the elimination of the German people as ethnic factor.

The fact that ethnic units are defined, in
international law, not only by their cultural and linguistic
background but also by their racially determined characteristics and
their biological, hereditary appearance - this is something that
Wizenthal and his cronies, as well as our politicians and our
judiciary, deny with such vigor that one might think they were
ignorant of these aspects of binding international legal
stipulations.

The "catastrophe" Wizenthal means is the one
that would probably result for the "Final Solution of the German
Question" if German politicians should let themselves get carried
away into allowing the German people themselves to determine the
matter of their continued existence.

The cat's out of the bag:

The "German national character" must not
remain the way God made it.

How pressing a concern the immigration of
foreigners into Germany is to the Imperial Jewish power, and how
clearly apparent the racial motives become in this matter, is shown
by a speech given by lgnatz Bubis, the leader of the Jews in Germany:

"...today, nationality is still based
'on ties of blood, on ethnic identity

"But now it is time to make it easier
for people (meaning the immigrants)...to become
naturalized" (Die Welt, November 17, 1992.)

342

For Bubis, who is such a nationalist with
regard to Israel but has never stood up for voting rights or the
citizenship of the Palestinians, the "Final Solution" for Germany
can't proceed fast enough.

The "left wing" - a CIA
invention?

University lecturer Dr. Reinhold
Wagnleitner's book Coca-Colonisation and kalter Krieg (cf.
chapter "The Campaign Against Jorg Haider") shows that ever since the
end of the Second World War (with the exception of the Kreisky era)
the Austrian "left wing" has been a spineless tool of the CIA and
thus of the Jewish-American Imperium.

The Internationale's concerted action in the
matter of genocide permits the conclusion that the Imperium may also
have brought the workers' parties outside the German sphere under its
control by means of thousands of paid agents.

For example, Die Presse (Vienna) of
November 11, 1992 reports:

"Social Democrats urge the European
Community towards immigration policies."

Against the will of their peoples, against
the interests of the workers, against the warnings of behaviorists,
against the lessons of history, against human rights and
international law and against economic constraints, they strive,
jointly and with the use of the same vocabulary, to complete the
great work of ethnic destruction in Europe.

And they all speak the same language as
Wizenthal, Bubis, Cohn-Bendit and the Jewish Masonic lodge B'nai
B'rith.

However, the complicity of the Socialist
Internationale and the Jewish lodges dates back further: as early as
1923, the Jewish-Austrian Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, writing in his
book Paneuropa, told us of the collaboration of the Freemasons
with the Social Democrats:

"The ultimate goal of the
Social Democrats' official program of foreign affairs is the
establishment of a Social Democratic world republic."

The Jewish Count Coudenhove-Kalergi's
vision, as published in the Wiener Freimaurerzeitung no. 9/10
of 1923, sounds downright bizarre and racist. We read:

"The human being of the future
will be a half-breed mongrel. For Pan Europe I wish for a
Eurasian-Negroid future race, to provide for a multitude of
personalities.

343

"The leaders will be drawn front the
ranks of the Jews, for a kind Providence has blessed Europe with a
new noble race of brilliant intellect in the form of the Jews."

In the course of many pages
Coudenhove-Kalergi explains what he expects to gain from the
forcibly-to-be-imposed mixing of the European peoples. In the first
section ("Nobility") of his book Praktischer Idealismus,
published in 1925 in Vienna by Paneuropa-Verlag, our Jewish Count
writes about his plan:

"Man of the far distant future will be
a mongrel half-breed... The result is that half-breeds often combine
a lack of character, unscrupulousness, weakness of will,
inconstancy, irreverence and disloyalty with objectivity...
and breadth of horizon."

The Jewish Count admits frankly that this is
the kind of human being he hopes to create in order to make Europe
governable for his Jewish nobility.

At first one is tempted to dismiss this
disgusting and utterly unfounded racial glorification of Jewry and
the insane planned intervention in Creation in order to breed a new
"people", which Coudenhove expounds over the course of many
nauseating pages in his opus Praktischer Idealismus, as the
fantasy ravings of evil and rather feeble-minded right-wing
extremists.

In January 1991, however, when we "in the
know" learned from the daily press (cf. Unabhdngige Nachrichten,
January 23, 1991) that the German Chancellor Helmut Kohl had been
awarded a medal by precisely this Pan-European Movement, a medal
named "the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize" in honor of this criminal
human-breeder, a chill went up our spine.

A man like Kohl, who dared oppose America
and did so much towards the reunification of what is left of Germany:
what kind of pressure must he have been put under to accept such a
reprehensible award?

The racist human-breeding plan that dwarfs
any and all other nonsense ever dreamed up by a human brain and that
would turn the Western world into a Frankensteinian test laboratory -
not in order to create a superman, but, as Kalergi openly admits, to
create a sub-human who would be "easy to govern" - is exposed in all
its criminal baseness by the German Chancellor's acceptance of the
Kalergi award. At one blow, all those people who may have wondered in
past years what could possess the European governments to throw open
their territories to trans-Continental immigration movements against
the will of their people, against all experience and against the
right to self-determination, have received a clear, if still
incomprehensible answer in the form of the German Chancellor's sign
of solidarity with the Jewish philosophical father of the Masonic
lodge B'nai B'rith.

344

But if Coudenhove's unconcealed plan for the
creation of a race of subhumans to populate Europe should not be the
concept underlying the malicious migration patterns we see going on
these days on the Continent, then I ask: what is?

I take it for granted that my readers as
well as the actors in this drama are aware that history, right up to
the present, has confirmed a hundred times over that the destruction
of the ethnic homogeneity of nations and settlement areas is a
devastating process with grave consequences.

What, other than Coudenhove-Kalergi's
concept, could explain the insanity of the present-day settlement
policy that is forcibly imposed on the nations involved, against
their wishes and their right to self-determination? What, other than
Kalergi's concept, could explain the concord that exists between the
B'nai Writh lodge, the governments, the international media and the
Wizenthal Lobby?

The fact that Kohl wears not only the
Kalergi medal but also that of the B'nai B'rith fills in any
remaining gaps in the evidence and substantiates the
incomprehensible, making it a probability bordering on certainty.

Jewish journalists confirm Kalergi's
planned genocide.

On July 3, 1986 an Israeli journalist named
David Krivine wrote in the Jerusalem Post (p. 3) about his
impressions of the European Community:

"..the advocates of tire Unified
European File hope to break the traditional pattern of the separation
of population groups along the lilies of their ethnic origin. The
human interaction within the new union will fundamentally alter the
face of Europe in a single generation. If at that point there are
even any national or ethnic groups left which disapprove o/~ such a
union, their political influence will be so snurll that they will not
be able to actualize a break-out of their country from the 'United
States of Europe'."

Criminal intent.

It is unlikely that Wizenthal, those
responsible from the B'nai B'rith, the Anti-Defamation League, the
media, and the politicians and Church dignitaries decorated for their
efforts on behalf of Kalergi's vision, should "not have known" of the
consequences of the criminal plan, namely the

345

creation of a disloyal, weak-willed and
unscrupulous type of human being by means of mass migration. At the
very latest, they know now.

And they also definitely knew, before, about
the consequences of international law entailed by the loss of a
common people, a closed settlement area and a joint will: just as
international law requires the three criteria listed as prerequisites
for the creation of a state (cf. Professor Gerhard Hafner/ORF,
Hohes Haus, September 22, 1991), the reverse means that the
foundation for a state's existence is in question when these three
criteria - namely, the common people, its closed settlement area, and
the resultant joint will - are destroyed.

If, for example, the proportion of foreign
students in Vienna is forcibly exploded from 0 to 56% in only 20
years (and despite the regularly polled wishes of the majority of the
people), then one can no longer consider my home town to be the
closed settlement area it was for a thousand years.

There is not the slightest doubt that the
ethnic shuffling that is still ongoing has as its guiding principle
the expansion and consolidation of the Israeli-American lmperium's
power - not the common good of the ancestral, domestic populace.

The fact that this goal is being
relentlessly pursued by the seemingly omnipotent Masonic lodge B'nai
Krith and by the media which is kept under Jewish control or at least
suckled with a constant stream of mother's milk from the news
agencies of the Israeli-American Imperium, and uniformly in violation
of the wishes of the domestic inhabitants - all this serves to harden
the suspicion that what we are observing is in fact a grand and evil
plan, being actualized against us and through us.

Just as two pieces of a puzzle fit
together, that which is happening today to Austria, to all of Germany
and to the rest of Europe fits together with the Jewish Count
Kalergi's criminal plan for the creation of a tractable race of
mongrelized sub-humans in Europe and a race of Jewish nobility to
govern them.

The Kalergi Medal, "gracing" the chest of
the German Chancellor, is an alarming signal.

Perhaps the European peoples are already
lost. Perhaps the criminal, racist insanity of a monstrous Jewish
striving for power is past stopping. Perhaps the voices of reason
slowly beginning to speak up among Jewry (Salcia Landmann,
Günther Nenning) are already too late.

Anti-Semitism, however, will survive, I fear
- will rise like a spirit from a bottle, like phoenix from the ashes.
It will lodge in that part of man's soul whence nationalism was
driven out, and like a natural catastrophe it will descend upon the
guilty and - I fear - upon the innocent as well.

346

I am afraid that once this crime against
humanity becomes known, such an anti-Semitism could suck into its
maelstrom and devour not only the few guilty powers, but all of
innocent Jewry as well, in one great, final and worldwide pogrom,
with no regard to personal guilt.

Therefore, the only true hope I can see is
an appeal to Jewish common sense.

"Democracy" as weapon against the people.
The Israeli-American Imperium's cultural aggression. Jazz as weapon.
"Everyone knew that anyone who talked was a dead man. "
(Syberberg) The German "left wing" - a CIA
tool.

"Even 20 years ago, any attempt to
describe the Jewish lobby's influence on American politics would
certainly have drawn accusations of antiSemitism The word in those
days was that a Jewish lobby was as much a fiction as that piece of
Czarist propaganda, the 'Learned Elders of Zion' who allegedly
determine the fate of the world."

With these words the German journalist Jorg
yon Uthmann, writing in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung of
Saturday, February 13, 1988, began an article which described the
Israeli-Jewish-American power cartel as a political reality. This was
the first time that anything like that was ever done in a "respected"
German daily paper.

Because I believe that people who point out
the reality of this power are even today at risk of being defamed as
"anti-Semites" in the tried and true old method, I will base my proof
of the existence of this Imperium on sources not vulnerable to
charges of anti-Semitism.

Uthmann demonstrates the unparalleled
association between Israel and the United States with a reference to
an odd institution: the "American Israel Public Affairs Committee",
called AIPAC for short.

AIPAC sets the Israeli-American relations
apart from all other relations which the United States and Israel,
respectively, maintain with all other nations. While embassies
normally serve to facilitate the forging of diplomatic ties
and the maintenance of alliances on the world's political stage, the
requirements of Israeli-American relations could evidently not be
satisfied with just an ambassadorial arrangement: and so the two
states created AIPAC, an institution that resembles a "Ministry for
National Jewish Interests" much more than it does a structure for the
maintenance of international relations.

For the first time ever, we learn from a
respected German daily newspaper sorne details about the structures
of the Jewish reign over America:

"Regarding the Democratic Party (which
the vast majority of Jews traditionally vote for), estimates of the
proportion of election funds which actually come from Jewish sources
range from 30 to 50 percent...

352

"With the 'Campaign Financing Act' of
1974, which was intended to regulate election donations, a new
structure appeared: the 'Political Action Committee'
(PAC). At least 60% of these PACs base their
election support on the issue of where the candidates stand with
regard to Israel; they are the transmission belt via which AIPAC and
the remaining Jewish organizations make their influence felt, not
only in Washington but throughout the country."

In view of these mechanisms, one can safely
conclude what some people have already known since 1933 and what
Wizenthal, on p. 20 of JNY, has an American officer couch in the
following words:

"...traffic in the States is
controlled by red and green lights, everything else is controlled by
the Jews." (JNY p. 20. )

But to return to Uthmann's
account:

"Today, Israel receives military and
economic aid from Washington to the tune of $4 billion annually - not
in loans, mind you, but as a gift. That amounts to about a third of
the total American foreign aid. Here too it is primarily AIPAC that
keeps the funds flowing...

"At this point the Holocaust also
comes into play. The planned, methodical reminders of the
concentration camps and gas chambers pursue a clear political
objective..."

Armed with this information, there is no
need to quote "right-wing extremist" sources or slandered individuals
in order to back one's contention that the Israeli-Jewish-American
Imperium, whose existence our politicians and our "contemporary
historians" continue to deny so hysterically, is in fact an obvious
reality.

"Democracy" as weapon against the
people!
The Imperium's cultural aggression.

The Austrian newspaper Der Standard
of July 23, 1991 reported that the American secret service spends
some $30 billion annually on its "espionage activities". We read:

"...following Webster's departure,
Richard Kerr, the CIA's previous vicedirector, will now conduct the
affairs of this gigantic institution, with an annual budged of $30
billion."

Therefore, what the American democracy
spends on terrorizing the world amounts to approximately 12 times the
Austrian armed forces' annual budget. At the beginning of World War
Two the German Wehrmacht

353

consisted of only 12 times the personnel of
the present-day Austrian armed forces (600,000 men), therefore we can
conclude:

The American Imperium invests an annual sum
in its "New World Order" that is roughly comparable to the 1939
budget of the German W ehrmacht.

Never before has the world been faced with a
more powerful organization for the repression of free thought.
Probably not even the worst of nightmares ever conceived of such a
scenario.

The scope and extent of the CIA's "little
brother", the Israeli secret service Mossad, is also described for us
in impressive detail by its renegade agent Victor Ostrovsky (By
Way of Deceplion): we learn that the tiny state of Israel
maintains a secret service 35,000 men strong, which equates to about
70°/" of today's Austrian armed forces.

If we multiply the population of Israel and
that of its secret service by a factor of 20 each, we get roughly the
population of Hitler's Germany and - well, well! - the strength of
the German Wehrmacht at the start of the War. In other words, for
purposes of espionage and disinformation alone, the Israeli secret
service maintains an organization whose strength, compared to the
base population of Israel, is roughly proportionate to the German
Wehrmacht as compared to all of Germany at the time when England and
France unleashed the Second World War by their declarations of war
against Germany in 1939.

And in the midst of peacetime the CIA spends
enough money on espionage, underworld killings and subornation of the
press to equal Hitler's entire army budget for 1939.

What a low opinion European politicians may
secretly have of this monstrous American organization is suggested by
a comment made by the Italian Prime Minister Andreotti. The KGB
archives had just been opened in the course of perestroika, and
Gorbachev had excluded KGB participation; Andreotti expressed the
suspicion that the attempt on the Pope's life might have been a
concealed action by the CIA and allied services (FAZ, December
1, 1992, p. 7).

It's clear that the "allied services" do not
refer to the naive German news services or the Austrian state police.
In its article the FAZ clearly suggested involvement by the
Mossad. By pointing out that "Moscow would not have profited" from
the assassination of the Pope, the FAZ poses the unspoken
question, who could have profited from a Muslim's murder of a
Roman-Catholic Pope? And in fact that insane act, which would only
have been to the detriment of the Islamic world and the Soviet state,
would have benefited none other than Israel, which could have counted
on the development of a

354

Western front of resistance to Muslim
positions if the assassination had succeeded.

Of course I am not suggesting that all of
the Israeli-American Imperium's half-million agents are involved in
murder; only a vanishingly small proportion are. There is no doubt a
vast and subtle arena of activity which may well range from the
splitting-up of nationalist formations in Austria and Germany by
means of infiltration, via the distribution of disgusting Nazi
computer games and the recruiting of false witnesses or agents
provocateurs, to the encouragement of graffiti vandalism of
Jewish cemeteries and memorial sites or even to acts of terrorism.
What is much more important, however, is the front along which the
"allied services" and their thousands of agents and subordinate
organizations work to undermine and to alter the cultural
self-perception of those nations to be brought under foreign control.

Salzburg university lecturer Reinhold
Wagnleitner's book Coca-Colonisation and kalter Krieg, from
which I have already quoted several times, gives us some insight into
the Imperium's work of cultural destruction at the heart of Europe,
by the example of post-1945 Austria:

"For the Austrian news market the
interweaving of state and private interests did not go
without consequences. The situation was similar to that in Japan and
in the German western zones where the monopolies of the
Domei and Wolff agencies were broken. In Austria as well, the
American news agencies AP and UPI, and to a lesser extent the British
agency Reuters, gained a firm foothold This was the beginning
of a decisive change. The pre-war monopoly of
French and German news services was smashed by the British and
American agencies.

"Incidentally, in 1946 the American news
service played a major role in the establishment of the
`Austria Presse Agentur' (APA), and AP and Reuters proceeded to
become the major foreign news suppliers to APA. The influence
of American news agencies was by no means restricted to
Austria, but increased in all of 'western' Europe " (p. 122.)

In this context I am reminded of the
American philosopher and historian Francis Parker Yockey, whom I
quoted in my now-banned book Freispruch für Hitler?. He
said:

"Propaganda is the only form of news
communication in America..."

How right he was. And now it is also clear
why America ultimately demands submission to the system of "Western
democracy" from every country it ever chose to force to its knees and
assume the role of pawn in its game of Imperial strategy. Once the
newspapers of such a country have been forced to quench their thirst
for information at poisoned wellsprings (namely

355

the American news agencies), the Imperium
imagines the souls of the people in question to be enchanted forever.

The son of Wizenthal's most indefatigable
witness Ella, Peter Michael Lingens (Wizenthal's ex-secretary),
recently advanced an astonishing theory: "In the next decade
the continued existence of democracy may depend on the quality of the
police force." (Wirtschaftswoche, November 26, 1992.)

Now it should dawn on even the most naive
that ever since 1945 the murderers of democracy have disguised
themselves as its guardians.

Jazz as weapon.
Terrorism against Karl Böhm and Herbert von
Karajan.

Two short but important quotations from
Reinhold Wagnleitner's documentation show what the United States had
planned for Austria, Germany and in fact for all of Europe after
1945:

"The US government's cultural efforts
to dazzle the Europeans with manifestations of their highly advanced
civilization were an integral part of the political strategy of
furthering Europe's integration into the 'One World', the Pax
Americana's 'Western world', by debilitating the European peoples'
cultural hubris." (p. 208.)

"Therefore it is hardly surprising
that not only the downfall of National Socialism but also the demise
of Germany's musical hegemony was a subject for discussion in the
United States as early as 1942. It was thus perfectly logical that
'serious' music was also included in the agendas of American cultural
diplomacy." (p. 226.)

To achieve their goals - Wagnleitner tells
us - the American secret service had its ISB agents establish more
than 600 jazz clubs in Austria alone. And now we also know where our
"discotheques" come from. Many a kindly old gentleman whom we know
from television, such as the opera critic Marcel Prawy, is exposed in
Wagnleitner's book as "cultural officer" of the American secret
service, as "Master of Ceremonies" (Wagnleitner, p. 227), charged
with some sinister mission such as supplanting German opera with the
American "musical" genre.

In defense of the Jew Marcel Prawy (real
name: Frydmann) it must be mentioned that he had no intention of
actually carrying out this notion. In the mid-1980s Prawy publicly
defended Richard Wagner's scores against the unqualified attacks of
another Austrian CIA cultural agent, Hans Weigel by name, a Jew,
"author" and Freemason. Which once again proves that no

356

position, no ethnic ties and no political
camp can force unwanted limitations on human decency.

The following quotation reveals how much
pressure the American program of cultural aggression exerted on
Austrian artists via its secret service:

"Moreover, negotiations with... Karl
Böhm and Herbert von Karajan had succeeded in persuading these
conductors to agree to include works by American composers in their
future repertoires." (Wagnleitner, p. 229.)

To give my readers an idea of the importance
which our enemies attached to the creation of an American
pseudo-culture (whose spokesmen in Austria included, for example, the
sculptor Hrdlicka, the Communist Turrini, the sex criminal Muhl and
the butcher Nitsch), I offer this excerpt from Coca-Colonisation
and kalter Krieg:

"It was with great reluctance, and not
until the last minute, that the festival management bowed to the
pressure exerted by the ISB ("Information Services Branch" - a
subsection of the American secret service) so that Samuel Barber's
'Adagio for Strings' was performed on August 30, 1946. Moreover, the
ISB sponsored the performances of Yehudi Menuhin...

"But even the American army was
ultimately powerless against the policies of the festival management
and the preferences of the audience." (Coca-Colonisation,
pp. 228f)

It would be beyond the scope of this chapter
to give a full account of the work of cultural and educational
destruction which the Imperium and its thousands of agents have
wrought in Austria and Germany and - a little less emphatically - in
other European nations since 1945.

What everyone knows and no-one dares
speak of:
"Fortune and misfortune of art in Germany since the last
war."

Movie and theater writer-director Hans
Jürgen Syberberg is the only one who dares, in his book, to call
a spade a spade:

"Ever since 1945, culture in the
Federal Republic of Germany has been governed by the 'unholy alliance
of Jewish leftist aesthetics' which set the intellectual climate with
'lies that paralysed all cultural life': Anyone who went along with
the Jews and the leftists made a career for himself.'

"This alliance, among whose 'spiritual
founding fathers' Syberberg lists names such as Adorno, Bloch,
Benjamin, Marcuse and Kracauer, has allegedly created 'an art without
a people': 'The cripple for art, and the hero for advertising

357

"The 'mafia system of
the democratic existential lie' has seen to it that without
'a progressive democratic leftist interpretation of
the world' no 'important book, no theater, no film, no
exhibition, no picture and no sound' could be created - and that even
all discussions and protests and opposition were only sham fights,
staged for reinforcement, and anyone who did not participate slipped
through the cracks: Everyone knew that anyone who talked was a dead
man. "' (FAZ, August 24, 1990.)

In his critique of Hans Jürgen
Syberberg's work, the journalist Werner Fuld included this quotation
from Syberberg's book vom Unglück and Gluck der Kunst in
Deutschland nach dem letzten Kriege (Fortune and
Misfortune of Art in Germany Since the Last War), published by
Matthes & Seitz, Munich. Fuld is generous with derision and
mockery and acts as though what Syberberg writes were all untrue.

But the way in which the FAZ
journalist concludes his article (for after all, who wants to be
a dead man?) admits implicitly that Syberberg is right:

"Where culture is the subject of
discussion, Syberberg is out of place. But one must wonder how any
publisher could accept the responsibility for publishing such a
certificate of chauvinistic dementia." (FAZ)

In other words, anyone who talks really is a
dead man.

Don't peek under the brim of Medusa's
hat: Wizenthal orders German Red Cross official fired.

Whereas empires throughout history only
began to feel threatened as enemy armies advanced, the
Israeli-American Imperium has a much lower stimulus threshold. It
attacks the moment it is recognized and called by name. The weapons
are of a legislative nature: "Incitement", "anti-Semitism",
"defamation"...

Recently this phenomenon also became
Professor Waldemar Schneider's undoing:

"Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal has
reported a high official from the DRK (German Red Cross) to the
provincial public prosecutor's office in Dusseldorf for making
anti-Semitic statements. Prof. Waldemar Schneider, 56, Chief of the
DRK's blood donor service, is the director of the 'Toko Institute for
Trans-Systematic Thought:.. In the July issue of the institution's
house publication Schneider published an approving review ('He that
understands the Jews sees what the world is all about) of the latest
book by the best-selling Japanese author Masami Uno, who... propounds
theories of world conspiracies.

358

"For example, Uno writes, the Russian
Revolution of 1917 was actually a Jewish revolution. Regarding the
German unions, the author claims that it is common knowledge that
they are powerfully influenced by Jews. Schneider's comment: 'A
suspensefully written book.'

"According to Secretary-General Johann
Romer, an internal investigation of Schneider is being conducted at
lite German Red Cross. He leaves no doubt about how the investigation
will end: 'We'll put a stop to this."' (Spiegel, no.
50, December 7, 1992.)

Syberberg would have left no doubt about it
either: that there will be a stop put to this. That Professor
Schneider is a "dead man".

The "left wing" - a CIA
tool.

As I have already quoted in this book,
Wagnleitner concludes from his study of the American archives
pertaining to Austria that "thanks to their militant Cold War
anti-Communism, which admittedly was usually carried on without their
leading politicians being aware of it, the Social Democratic parties
could virtually be considered allied partners of the CIA."
(Coca-Colonisation, p. 78.)

Regarding the situation in Germany there are
also valuable testimonies:

In 1988, for example, Henric Wuermeling,
historian and television editor with the Bavarian Broadcasting
Corporation, published the book Die Weiße Liste
(Ullstein-Verlag). This book has not received nearly as much
attention as it deserves. Wuermeling documents the American
re-education efforts and cultural aggression against Central Europe,
with particular emphasis on Germany, just as Wagnleitner does for
Austria. Unlike Wagnleitner, who mentions only the occasional name,
Wuermeling came up with a list of 1,500 Germans whom the wartime
enemy powers had already selected years before the end of the war to
collaborate with the victors against their own people and their core
interests.

This book, which is based exclusively on
material from American archives, verifies that American strategists
gave limited support to Communist groups and initiatives in the
German sphere where they needed these forces to keep nationalist
endeavors in check.

Now it is no doubt clear to many why ever
since the end of the war gangs of "left-wing demonstrators" have been
allowed to violently attack and break up nationalist rallies and
gatherings of veterans and soldiers, and to do so with the evident
blessing of the police.

359

It is also becoming clear why murders of
right-wingers by left-wingers (for example the murder of a Salzburg
hotelier by the Austrian television editor Köchl) are not
prosecuted, or are prosecuted so unenthusiastically that the cases
remain "unsolved".

We may conclude that the idealism of
thousands of young people in Germany and Austria has been misused for
decades through "leftist ideology" concocted at institutes for
sociology and political sciences and instilled into the minds of the
up-and-coming intellectuals. Encouraged by the seemingly inexplicable
idleness of the police and the courts, these young people acted out
their dream of revolution and their anti-Capitalist visions in the
streets - much to their fathers' and grandfathers' dismay - not
knowing that their activities were being used and exploited to
Germany's detriment by precisely that Capitalist power whose ideology
they believed they were fighting. Only in cases where they went
beyond the Imperium's own goals (like Andreas Baader and Ulrike
Meinhoff), recognized their creators, and attacked them, did the
Imperium strike back.

No doubt the scales will also fall from the
eyes of those Austrians who to date always wondered why the
SPO-suckled "Documentary Archives of the Austrian Resistance" has
been persistently unable to discover any American and not even any
Soviet war crimes and why it is ever ready to defend the "noble role
of Communism". What the naivest of the naive always thought was
"contemporary history" was in fact the Machiavellian runaround staged
by the American secret service CIA who played rightwingers and
leftists off against each other and, unnoticed by workers and
intellectuals alike, set up its command center in the Austrian
Federation of Labor Unions, the headquarters of the labor movement.

This is the Israeli-American Imperium's "New
World Order". A network of murder and terrorism. A network of bribery
and corruption and a secret, insidious cultural aggression trickling
through thousands of channels to the heart of the Western world.
Covered by "allied services" of army-scale strength.

For all these many years my commitment
against anti-Semitism has been received with scorn and even derided
by the Austrian public prosecutors as "a self-defensive claim". As
though concerns for my own safety had ever been in the forefront of
my motivations.

That my persecutors, for whom lies are their
native element, will continue to call me an anti-Semite is something
I can accept.

I do care, however, that my readers should
know that a dark sort of superstition, claiming that one people
amongst all peoples in the world is inherently evil, has always been
and always will be repugnant to me.

"The good are everywhere among us - it is
time that they stand up and join forces." I wrote this in my last
book, which has since been banned and confiscated: Freispruch
für Hitler?. And now I would like to add:

It is the good, the honest and the fair
among the Jews whom I address in the present documentation, for
without their voice and their work to build on, I would not have
taken the risk entailed in writing this present book.

Recognizing the face of the Medusa of our
time - the Israeli-American Imperium - is the great hazard of the
present, because it feels threatened by those who can see its face
and identify it.

The methodology of this Imperial power that
uses "democracy" and "freedom of the press" as cudgels against the
people could be detailed in this book only insofar as it was
necessary to enable an understanding of Wizenthal's mission. It is
characteristic of this brand of power politics that it disguises its
aggression and work of destruction with noble ideals so that the
inherent defensive vitality of the attacked nations will not be able
to identify it until it is too late - if at all. Opponents are never
respected as worthy adversaries, but are defamed beyond recognition.
This modus operandi is typical of all of "anti-Fascism" (which
the American propaganda machinery invented more than half a century
ago to combat Germany while at the same time sparing and protecting
Stalin).

The ongoing genocide against Europe by means
of migration, forcibly achieved in violation of valid international
law and in a negation of racial-ethnic identity - lets us see the
Imperium's current goals and working methods close-up and with
frightening clarity.

The wellsprings of its global propaganda are
the American news agencies, whence the peoples of the word draw their
misinformation like duped helots.

366

The Imperium's weapons are the electronic
media and the international press, which it has brought largely under
its control, as well as the book and art trade and in fact the
Western Hemisphere's entire culture industry.

Like evil twins, the "allied services"
Mossad and CIA lurk behind these front-line activities, ever ready to
commit disinformation and cultural terrorism, to prejudice the media,
to deceive, falsify, lie and stack the deck. Ready even for murder,
if need be.

The American armed forces stand in reserve,
ready to be deployed anywhere in the world to fight for the
Imperium's interests.

With the end of the Six Days' War in 1967,
the political boundaries between America and Israel began to blur
more and more, so that in many respects it now seems as though we
were dealing with one state on two different territories - an
opponent with two heads.

The Zionists in Israel and the world have
joined forces and allied themselves extensively with the Jewish
financial power in America (Federal Reserve Bank), as though there
had never been a conflict of interest between the two positions.

To associations, parties and even statesmen,
taking up the fight against this Imperium seems hopeless, and not
without good reason. But I am convinced that the Imperial Jewish
power of our time could be much more readily put in its place through
dialogue rather than confrontation, since after all the interests of
this worldwide Imperial Jewish power do not really coincide with the
interests of those who want to ensure the continued existence of the
Jewish national state. And vice versa.

Israel's current dependence on the American
military power may seem reassuring and even seductive, but it is hard
to miss the fact that the United States are sick as well - made ill
particularly by the ethnic destabilization of the country, planned
and set off by the same elements that depend on its strength:

Already in the Gulf War, American industry
had to fall back on computer chips from Japan and electronics from
Germany. The Boeing plants lacked skilled workers to rivet the
airplane fuselages. The IsraeliAmerican Imperium governs a giant
which it has deliberately debilitated so as to be able to dominate it
even more thoroughly.

The great misapprehension under which the
Zionists involved in this alliance continue to labor is their belief
that:

1) the American Imperium can guarantee
Israel's continued existence for all time. But provided that the
silent majority remains mired in its lethargy, in only 50 years the
United States will turn out to have been perhaps the

367

most short-lived world power of all time,
and will have permanently dropped out of the ranks of the First World
in technological and cultural respects.

2) the ethnic survival of the Jewish people
could be fostered by the destruction of the world's other ethnic
groups.

The opposite is true. It is precisely the
ethnic diversity, the worldwide chorus calling for a national state -
the only natural construct confirming to the law of nations - which
can serve as protective bulwark that guarantees Israel's survival as
well.

The destruction of the world's nations
through migrations such as the Imperium conducts against the will of
these nations and against natural law and creation can hold no gains
for the Idea of a Jewish State. On the contrary: Germany, Europe and
the world of denationalized helots would adopt anti-Semitism as a
sort of substitute for national identity, and would undoubtedly
eliminate what would be the smallest ruling class ever to gain power
in the history of mankind - electronic media, CIA and Mossad
notwithstanding.

In the long term, Israel's interests on
the one hand and those of the American-Jewish financial hegemony on
the other are not the same.

In his editorial about the power of the Jews
in America, Uthmann wrote (FAZ, February 13, 1988):

"Aside from these individual cases,
however, there is also an increase in the number of voices asking the
very basic and fundamental question, whether this amalgamation of
Jewish, Israeli and American politics is truly in the interests of
all involved."

Anti-Zionism - often used only as a fig leaf
by critics of the Jewish Imperium who want to avoid being
contaminated by the stench of antiSemitism - is a wrong
starting-point, I think. A Jewish ideology whose aim it is to secure
the continued existence of the Jewish people in a Jewish national
state may well be a bitter enemy of other peoples - such as the
Palestinians. But by the nature of their philosophical origin, the
truly implacable enemies of the national right to self-determination
are not the Jewish nationalists but the Jewish internationalists.

It is the Jewish international financial
power, in whose materialistic power-philosophy of debit and credit
the existence of nations has been denied all value, that draws its
opposition from fundamentals. Despite shortsighted pride and the
widespread identification with the power exerted by the Imperium,
"the Jews" are by no means all as uncritical as one might think. In
this context, Uthmann writes in the FAZ of February 13, 1988:

"But not only the Republicans, many
Jews as well are wondering whether it is right to stand by Israel at
any price. In a poll of Jews conducted in

368

1983 by the American Jewish Committee,
51 % of those polled dissociated themselves from the settlement
policies on the West Bank; 42 % suggested that Israel should withdraw
from the occupied territories in return for appropriate guarantees
of peace."

If one were to adopt the principle of
collective responsibility (as Wizenthal does with regard to Germany),
the great planned genocide of Europe by means of the directed birth
deficits and immigration would doubtless be a "Jewish crime". But
here too we see that the current political powers-that-be are not
able to manipulate the Jewish basis as fully as they might like. The
Jewish author Salcia Landmann, who lives in Switzerland today, has
expressed honest and humane views on the question of refugee
policies. Her opinions are diametrically opposed to the slogans of
the official Jewish organizations.

"Therefore it is completely ridiculous
for the few European Jews.. to join in the lament raised by these
anti-refugees against 'racism' and 'hatred of
foreigners'.

"Out of fear of being accused
of racism, not one German politician dares to correct these refugee
policies which have been so grossly perverted." (Spiegel,
no. 1, 1992.)

And Mrs. Landmann suggests what only
"right-wing extremists" usually suggest, and what is the only
sensible thing any decent person can suggest at all in this context:

"Are you in danger in your native
country? Then we'll pay your fare to a country next to yours, with a
regime acceptable to you. But if you're not in danger in your native
country, we'll pay for your return trip there. In any case you belong
into your own cultural sphere, not here."(Spiegel, no. 1, 1992.)

The insanity can only be stopped in time
with help from Jewish opposition within the Imperium itself. Not only
with help from Jewish opposition within Zionism, but - as I believe -
also by encouraging commonsense opposition in Wall Street.

The insane attack which the Imperium has
maliciously launched against the closed settlement regions and thus
against international law by means of the migrations it has
instigated, could very well soon bring it down rather than
consolidate its power.

Judeophobia and anti-Semitism cannot provide
a quick solution: our "fifth column" at the heart of the
Israeli-American Imperium can only be Jews themselves, specifically
the honest, decent and just. Those who have been kept from speaking
up so far (cf. the Weise case).

369

Evil will call up resistance by good,
everywhere and at all times. Wizenthal - whose obituary I have
striven to write in his own lifetime - is a manifestation of the
Imperium's reprehensible and short-sighted methods and goals. His
face and his work bear the features of the Empire of money and sin
for which he stands - just as the work of the former Austrian
Chancellor Dr. Bruno Kreisky, to whom this book is dedicated,
embodies to us the position of tolerance, honesty and reconciliation.

So let's summarize:

A common fraud with a pronounced interest in
wallowing in sorrow and tears, a man of great cunning but mediocre
intellect, who sold us his own mother as "a German" out of greed for
hard German cash, has been allowed to represent the Imperium to
Germany before all the world. He has been permitted to thwart the
scientific investigation of the "Holocaust" and to engage in
unbridled hate propaganda against Germany.

Someday no-one will be able to whitewash
himself by claiming he "didn't know anything about it". The
injustice, inhumanity and incitement have always been there for
everyone to see.

But Wizenthal himself would be utterly
unimportant - just as he is already pushed into the background in
this final summary. He would be no more than just an evil old man -
if, that is, his work did not bear witness to the intentions of the
Jewish-American Imperium in Germany and Europe over the past
half-century; it is this Imperium whose cultural and political will
to aggression he personifies.

So there he goes: the convicted liar, the
fraud, false witness and kidnapper.

There he goes: the "Nazi hunter", a murder
suspect who claims to have nothing to do with the murderers of "Nazi"
victims.

There he goes: the nasty Jewish racist who
selects his co-workers according to religion and race and who urges
us to commit national suicide through immigration.

There he goes: the slanderer of Germany and
of the German soldier, of the 14 million expellees and the six
million slaughtered German civilians.

There he goes: the evil old man whose
profession it was to bear false witness against Germany, who drew his
joie de vivre from hate, whose most brazen anecdotes statesmen
and crowned heads had to accept as touching stories.

And the seeds of his hatred are growing
wild:

Even more so than the young Germans of today
and tomorrow, his victims are the young generation in Israel and the
United States, whose

370

hearts he has poisoned with his "Holocaust
Museums", the temples of hatred against Germany.

And now that crafty, unscrupulous old man
simply walks off the stage, leaving a monstrous open account behind.

The teachings of the "collective
responsibility" of innocent persons, the crushing mortgage which is
Wizenthal's legacy to Jewry, seems to me like a landmine.

His juridical murders, his falsifications
and swindles and his activities on behalf of injustice and hatred of
all things German over the past half-century which this book
documents will dwindle to trivialities if the world should one day
take up his teachings of "collective responsibility" and apply them
to their prophet's people, for then it could well happen that all of
Jewry, instead of only the guilty ones, will face the historical
responsibility.

One might ask now what stockpile there is of
crimes committed, caused or shared in by individual Jewish criminals
in this century? For example:

1. the 90 million civilian victims of
world Communism (Soviet Union, China, South East Asia);

7. the great genocide planned in cold
blood against the Western world, by cultural migration forcibly
imposed in violation of the peoples' right to self-determination.

Jewry must recognize the needs of the moment
and convince its leaders to reverse course. The first step can only
be a German-Jewish reconciliation. And the foundation of this
reconciliation are Truth and Justice.

Truth and Justice - therein lies Israel's
hope.

Woe to the world's innocent Jews, if blind
revenge for unredressed Jewish wrongs should one day take them
hostage worldwide to collective responsibility!

After reading this book, it is obvious that
a dishonest man has been exploiting a grave matter with impunity, for
many years playing avenger of a persecution, the worst consequences
of which he was spared.

At this point we must thank the
representatives of the jewish establishment, which I assume, will
distance themselves even farther from Wizenthal following the
revelations of this book. Already on German television, in the
program "Panorama" of February 8, 1996, some of its prominent members
distanced themselves determinedly from Wizenthal, practically
implying that he was a liar. So far, unfortunately, the consequencies
have not been drawn. Two of the most important should be:

1. All Simon Wiesenthal Centers
should be renamed, for example Genocid Memorial Centers.

2. In the interests of democracy and
justice, the fate of the jews must not be the only one singled out
for commemoration. The genocide against any and all peoples of tlic
world - after honest investigation and identification of the guilty -
must be equally mourned.

The exclusive reporting of jewish
suffering could all to soon affect the feelings of all other people
as beeing a violation of the Principle of Equality!

Genocide of Black Americans through
segregation and slavery, of the Red Indians, of the Irish through the
centuries, starvation of the Boer women and children in concentration
camps to force their men to surrender to the British invaders, of
Ukranians through planned starvation, of Germans by the dictates of
Versailles and of Potsdam, with the murder of six million German POWs
and civilians during "ethnic cleansing" through the expulsion of 14
million from their homeland, the mass extermination of civilians in
Hiroshima and Nagasaki even alter the Japanese offer of surrender,
and the ongoing genocide of Palestinians, of Kurds, of Chechens, the
starvation death of Iraqi children by the continued blockade imposed
by Washington and London - can these be rated lesser Crime against
Humanity ?

Above all, it seems that all over the globe
in monuments and museums we can no longer suppress the remembrance of
the 1 10 million civilians - onchundredandten million souls, a
downright unimaginable number of human beings-who died as victim of
antifascism, of whom 100 million alone were murdered in Communist
countries. Do these not also merit our resolve of "Never again
" ?

Last but not least, a suggestion: In view of
these facts, nobody should pretend, as is being done these days, that
Good and Evil in this world of ours can be attributed by racial or
ethnical definition, only to certain nations or even forms of
government. As we see from the events mentioned, Criminals and
Victims can be found on all sides - and in shocking
proportions.

Göran Holming

"When a Jew, in America or in South Africa, talks to
his Jewish companions about 'our' government, he means the
government of Israel."