Freedom2Care: Rescue us from this precipiceDec 26, 2009Anyone who's visited a government Department of Motor Vehicles can imagine how government-directed healthcare decisions—which would occur under current legislation with or without the “public option”—will result in the …

Okay, I was wrong. Obamacare is way less popular and efficient than any state Department of Motor Vehicles.

The administration must be quietly realizing this fact, now that even the most liberal Obamacare supporters are mercilessly mocking the hapless healthcare program. Just read the Washington Post story, "How Jon Stewart became President Obama's biggest problem" and watch Stewart's lampooning of the Obamacare rollout.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

The Southern Baptist Conference's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission new president could be
understood to be discouraging political activism by Christians, in a Wall Street Journalstory today in which
he opines that Christians should not serve as "mascots for any political
faction."

The article notes, "Mr. Moore, a 42-year-old political
independent and theologian, says it is time to tone down the rhetoric and pull back
from the political fray, given what he calls a 'visceral recoil' among younger
evangelicals to the culture wars.

Doubtless the Journal
chose which controversial quotes and thoughts to emphasize from the articulate
and biblically committed Baptist leader--an editing process that can cause skewing
of a person's actually balanced views.

The article also included a moderating statement by Moore, "We
are involved in the political process, but we must always be wary of being
co-opted by it."

Nevertheless, any perception of a political disengagement message
must be countered before it wrongly knocks some Christians out of the public
policy arena and leaves our nation with policies impoverished by the absence of
Christian influence.

Some Christian leaders may feel that an anti-politics message will
help win back to the church some critics, especially the young, who equate
Christian political involvement with nastiness and subservience to special
interests. I have my doubts. Many of the young oppose political engagement by
the Church because they oppose certain values
the Church stands for, most notably on abortion or sexuality. You won't hear
these same critics castigating the Church for engaging politically on issues
such as environmental care, healthcare for the poor or human trafficking.

As far as castigating believers for hewing to political party
marching orders, I work in Washington among many believers, and I can't think
of a single Christian colleague who functions as a mascot for a political
party. If anything, we all remain deeply distrustful of political parties and
operatives, while at the same time recognizing that influencing public policy
in America requires political engagement.

If many Christian prolife advocates lean Republican in political
persuasion, that's not because of mindless subservience to Republican dogma but
because the Republican party largely takes prolife stances whereas Democrats largely
defend abortion. Nevertheless, no Christian I know thinks the Republican party
is always right, principled or reliable.

One colleague even joked to me the other day, "There are two
parties in Washington--the evil party and the stupid party."

My impression is that few, if any, Christians working in
Washington fit the imagined mold of the blinded-by-power political "mascot."
Certainly the thoughtful and winsome representatives of the Southern Baptist
Convention who work in Washington politics counter that stereotype.

It remains sadly true that we followers of Christ at times have
demonstrated attitudes, rhetoric and actions related to politics that require
repentance. We simply need to act more like the One we represent. So yes, let
us repent of judgmentalism, hypocrisy and abrasiveness in voicing our views. May
God replace these qualities with spiritual qualities of grace, integrity,
humility and love.

But let us never repent of engaging in the democratic political
process. That is our duty and a tremendous opportunity to fight injustice and
accomplish good in our society.

Imagine a world bereft of the political engagement of Christian
religious leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King, abolitionist William Wilberforce
and myriad lesser-known leaders like Jonathan Mayhew, whose sermons and
writings helped undergird the American Revolution. Christian political
engagement has helped secure racial justice, free slaves and throw off tyranny.

As my friend and colleague Barrett Duke of the Southern Baptist
Ethic and Religious Liberty Commission observes,
"Public policy engagement by the Christian community is also about helping
others." He outlines as examples the public policy work of followers of
Christ to tackle issues ranging from human trafficking to gene patenting to
abortion to immigration reform.

The Christian faith is about establishing a personal relationship
with the God of the universe and about expressing that relationship by loving
our neighbor. The two remain inseparable--faith and works, heaven and earth,
receiving grace and showing mercy.

We demonstrate our faith in God by defending the defenseless, advocating
for the poor, righting injustice. The political process offers one arena for
such ministries.

It is true, as Dr. Moore emphasizes, that Christian believers
belong to a different realm, far above politics--the kingdom of heaven. Yet as
citizens of that kingdom, Jesus charges His followers to do all that we can to
see that the kingdom comes and that His will "be done on earth--as it is in
heaven."

Early Christians had little say in their governments, ruled and
often persecuted by tyrannical oppressors. Still, leaders like the Apostle Paul
appealed to government authorities for justice and also personally challenged
governors to consider for themselves a new life in Christ.

Paul never separated evangelism from engaging with government,
and neither should we. We the people of faith enjoy an opportunity to influence
our government as few Christians in history or today enjoy.

The first two chapters of the biblical book of Romans show that
God has revealed Himself to every person--through nature and through our
consciences. Tragically, many reject that revelation, preferring self to God.

Yet many respond to that revelation, making moral choices in line
with His kingdom principles. A pregnant teen chooses adoption over abortion. A
tempted spouse chooses faithfulness. A person raised in bigotry chooses racial
reconciliation. While none of these choices alone constitutes salvation, they
all represent faith steps taken toward God. When individuals make moral
choices in line with God's kingdom, they keep their hearts and minds open to
God.

And that's what public policy engagement is about for Christian
believers--encouraging our countrymen to take faith steps toward God. To choose
life, to defend the defenseless, to advocate for the poor and downtrodden.

With this perspective, we must not disdain but instead honor the
ministry of working in the political realm as an evangelistic ministry. By
encouraging faith steps toward God and His principles, believers can help their
fellow citizens and nation keep hearts and minds open to God and His Good News.

The Wall Street Journal
notes in its article profiling Moore that "many in the religious right are
stepping back from the front lines." The article also quotes Mark DeMoss,
a Christian consultant for evangelical leaders in the past including Jerry
Falwell, as commenting that "a growing number of evangelicals simply find
politics distasteful."

Rather than stepping back from politics, more believers need to engage
in public policy, proactively advancing policies promoting the welfare of their
countrymen and defensively advancing religious freedom for people of faith. We
can't desert the battlefield just because a few soldiers have misfired.

If some believers have fought political battles in an antagonistic
way, let us show how to engage in a winsome
way. If others have let bigotry and hubris mar their testimony, let us demonstrate Christ's love with
grace and humility. If others have proven emissaries of ill will, let us serve as ambassadors of good
will.

Like Jesus' parable of the Pharisee proudly praying in the temple
while a sinner pleads for mercy, it's easy to contrast ourselves with those who
have failed in the political arena, thanking God that we are not like that political-party-idolizing
sinner. It's a lot harder to maintain that proud perfection in battle, with enemy
bullets flying and friendly fire sending comrades running for cover.

We must not despair of the battle. Let us choose our weapons carefully and fight on.

"Therefore, we are
ambassadors for Christ, as though God were making an appeal through us; we beg
you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God" (I Corinthians 5:20).

RE: Public comment submission to the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee, regarding its consideration of oocyte modification in assisted reproduction for the prevention of transmission of mitochondrial disease or treatment of infertility

2.Germ line genetic engineering also transgresses the ethical principle of autonomy; no successive generation can provide informed consent for the consequences of the precursor generation's genetic experimentation.

4.Procedures involving germ line genetic engineering are not essential, since ethical options remain for women with an identified high risk. Providing a loving home for a child through adoption, for example, far surpasses any perceived value of retaining a measure of genetic relation attained at the risk of tragic genetic consequences.

5.Opening the door to germ line genetic engineering also opens the door to the dehumanizing, utilitarian quest for perfect children--"designer babies." Rather than treating children as a commodity fulfilling parents' dreams, our humanitarian values and our Constitution require us to treat every human being as inherently valuable and worthy of love, respect and protection.

We urge the Committee to reject oocyte modification in assisted reproduction as unacceptably risky, unethical and inhumane.