Channel 4 FactCheck goes behind the spin to dig out the truth and separate political fact from fiction.

“All you have to do now if you come from Eastern Europe, all you have to do is to get a national insurance number – which you can get easily within a fortnight – and then you qualify automatically for social housing”

It’s the “real story” that Nigel Farage claimed nobody on the Question Time panel would want to discuss.

The UK Independence Party leader said the shortage of social housing in parts of London was due to the number of immigrants hailing mainly from Eastern Europe.

On day one, these immigrants qualify for social housing he said. But the Liberal Democrat Simon Hughes did want to discuss Mr Farage’s real story – and he said it wasn’t true.

Who’s right? It’s Answer Time with FactCheck.

The analysis

Firstly, as a House of Commons Library research note points out; “It is worth noting at the outset that there is no general entitlement to social housing for anyone in England, including British citizens.”

Just like British people, those from abroad have to meet the criteria. “Foreign nationals do not get any extra priority”, the HoC Library notes.

EU nationals don’t need a work permit and have the right to freedom of movement within the EU. But to qualify for social housing they must be employed.

A spokesman for the Department for Communities and Local Government told FactCheck: “Since 2006, European economic area nationals have been, broadly speaking, eligible for local authority housing if they are working lawfully, are self-sufficient or have a permanent right of residence (following five years lawful residence).”

There are some exceptions, such as students, but they will have to pass the “habitual residence test”.

Until last year, A8 migrants had to prove they were working and had to register on the Worker Registration Scheme (WRS) in order to be eligible for social housing. Although they no longer have to register on the WRS, they are now in the same position as other EU nationals – who have to prove they are habitually resident and have a right to reside – i.e. are working, self-sufficient, a former worker and so on.

Anyone who just tips up without a job is highly unlikely to prove their “right to reside” – even if they do get a National Insurance number (which if you are unemployed takes months to come through, not weeks, FactCheck understands).

Past research by the homeless charity Shelter has found that while even under the old rules, A8 workers would have been eligible, they “scarcely gained access to social housing at all”.

In 2006/07 less than 1 per cent of all housing association lettings were to A8 nationals.

Overall, EU migrants are much more likely to live in the private rental sector. Around 90 per cent of people who arrived in the UK from 2006-2008 were living in private rentals, according to a report from the Migration Impacts Forum in 2008.

Furthermore, a TUC-commissioned survey in 2007 found that more than 40 per cent of migrants working +48 hour weeks were in accommodation provided through their employer – with the rent taken from their wages for accommodation often in very poor condition.

The verdict

Nobody automatically qualifies for social housing – not even born-and-bred Brits.

Like everyone else, EU migrants have to apply for it – but they have to prove they have the “right to reside” – which is not an automatic right and would be extremely difficult for anyone without a job. Plus, getting hold of a National Insurance number without a job would take months.

Meanwhile, statistics show that around 90 per cent of people who arrived in the UK from the EU between 2006-08 lived in privately rented accommodation.

So Mr Farage is wrong to link the chronic lack of social housing in London with the flow of Europeans into the capital.

And he digs an even deeper hole for himself by singling out Eastern Europeans – because until last year people from these ‘A8’ countries (the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia) had even less rights to social housing than those from the older member states.

Indeed, figures show that less than 1 per cent of all social housing was let to A8 nationals in 2006-07.

By Emma Thelwell

*this article has been updated slightly to reflect the changes of May 2011 which altered the status of A8 nationals. The verdict however remains unchanged.

Comments

Point of information – the WRS for A8 nationals ended on 1 May 2011, from which point A8 nationals have had the same rights as nationals of the older EU states.
Also, it is wrong to use the term “public funds” in relation to A8, or any other EU, nationals. There are no public funds restrictions on EU nationals for benefits purposes. EU nationals can have restrictions placed on their assess to “social assistance” (which is normally taken to mean means tested benefits and assistance with housing costs) but do not have a public funds restriction. Public funds restriction apply to those granted leave to remain from outside the EU.

There is only a finite amount of housing available, private or social. Maybe Farage was wrong on the specific issue of how fast Eastern EU migrants can become eligible, but it is a complete fallacy to believe migrants aren’t a factor in the shortage of housing. They are, after all, living somewhere.

There’s insufficient housing for people who need housing in the high demand areas. Those areas include the South-East and in some rural areas such as North Yorkshire. Matter of fact there’s shortages in most areas.
Local Authorities are obliged to find accommodation for all those who present to them and can demonstrate that their homeless condition is not self-inflicted (like they left home or were evicted because they didn’t pay their rent).
Housing suppliers may not discriminate on ethnic or racial criteria, so Mr.Farage is probably all right. However many ‘homeless’ providers prefer tenants who are eligible for housing benefits because that guarantees they get paid. Which means being unemployed is advantageous.

Many people “qualify” for social housing but never get it due to being too far down the qualification scale.

Happy to accept that Farage may be wrong in relation to the ease of access to social housing, however the much more interesting point he made was that circa 50% of new claims for social housing are from non-UK nationals. If true this goes towards accounting for the shortage.

So – is it the case that circa 50% of all new social housing goes to non-UK nationals?

I am sorry but your article is misleading and written by someone who writes like a politician by missing out facts and the realty. In most London Boroughs there are newly arrived EU [sic] citizens who are housed in private accommodation that is paid for by the local authority and these figures do not have to be included on social housing lists. If you wish a specific example go to Slough or Harrow. Make a recent [2011/12] check on Harrow Social Housing register and also check on those receiving Housing Benefits to live in Private Accommodation and you will find that the majority [over 50%] are non-UK born citizens.

Hi Emma from FactCheck here. My information came from Shelter and the government. Both told me that the new rules didn’t make a difference re: the research pointed to above. However given all the comments here, I may have been misinformed and I will look into making corrections where necessary. Thanks

The answer to your question is NO. The groups of people paid very good wages to administer/manage/regulate the housing market in this country are to blame – following which, those we rely on to hold administrations to account.

Where have you all been for the last 30 years? Watching as public housing is sold off and leased back to the state at a very good profit [while practicing your inclination to throw insults at ‘others’ perhaps]. The consequences of a home owning democracy, great in ‘it…

The government have no long term strategy which is why we have crap housing, health, schools, roads, rail etc. etc….. no capacity planning .. just some short termism on a 4 yearly basis to win the next the election.