Near Earth Asteroid Sept 14 2012

NEAR-EARTH ASTEROID: A relatively large asteroid, just discovered on August 28th, will fly past the Earth-Moon system on Sept 14th only 2.8 million km
(7.4 lunar distances) away. 2012 QG42 is about as wide as three football fields and comes to us from just beyond the orbit of Mars. Astronomers who
are now monitoring the space rock say it shines about as brightly as a 15th magnitude star. [3D orbit] [ephemeris]

3 football fields in size and just over 7 lunar distances away = we won't feel squat.

Something that is only 900 feet in diameter and that far away does not have enough mass (as long as it's made of normal matter) to affect anything
here on earth.
Even if it were to pass within only 1,000 miles of our planet, we wouldn't feel anything from it.

Now the Earth would affect it, due to the fact the earth is over 40,000 times more massive in size than that rock.

Something that (relatively) small and almost 2 million miles away isn't going to do squat to us, but what does concern me is that they just found out
about this. If that had been on a collision course, that would've gave us, what, 17 days to ponder. Makes you wonder that much harder if the
ELE-able one is out there lurking yet to be discovered...

Originally posted by eriktheawful
3 football fields in size and just over 7 lunar distances away = we won't feel squat.

Something that is only 900 feet in diameter and that far away does not have enough mass (as long as it's made of normal matter) to affect anything
here on earth.
Even if it were to pass within only 1,000 miles of our planet, we wouldn't feel anything from it.

Now the Earth would affect it, due to the fact the earth is over 40,000 times more massive in size than that rock.

I wouldn't expect to see any effect from this flyby whatsoever. We could look to the future and see if it could well come closer given more
observation. Astronomically speeking this is tiny and dim that is why these are most often are not seen until the make a close approach if then.

well it should be one heck of a birthday. I cant belive something that big and they are just now seeing it? Really

You did read the article right? 900 feet, Magnitude +15.0

That's dim. Very, very, very dim. You will not see it with your eyes alone, and you're going to need a very big telescope to see it with your
eyes.

Most of these objects are spotted by pictures. A picture is taken of the sky with a telescope. The longer exposure allows very dim and small objects
like this to appear in the picture.

Then another picture of the same area of the sky is taken the next night at the same time.

THEN the 2 pictures are compared to see if any of the "stars" appear to move against the back ground of known, fixed stars. If something does, then
you've discovered something.

This is a tedious process, and you may, or may not see something. If the object had been further away, and was even dimmer than Mag +15.0, it may not
have shown up in that picture of that sky, and not discovered.

Its the ones that are e class & PAUSE then are re direct that are NOT shared with the public (that require X37b or similar approaches/evals) let alone
the Frequency of some kind emitting kinds. Puts sheep clothing back on and baaa

To bring everyone back down to earth a bit, here's a table of the known impact risks. Note the Torino scale numbers/colors - anything above a 2 or 3
would be of some concern, but there are none above a 1. But, of course, these are only the ones that they know of....

I think some are MEANT to fly by ONLY as if to RECON (but I am an out of box thinker lol) If there EXIST another species "IN" EA*RTH that IS elder
to mankind 1 would think by now they would of developed technology to fend off such risky visitors UNLESS they dont want to.

I have paid attention to a few (especially since Nibaru/Planet X/ELE). It seems if it is LESS than 1 LD (230k miles), and bigger than 1000 ft or so
across, not much of anything happens.

Bigger and you can see a tug. I'd like to be better at knowing which side of the Earth was facing toward/away and real directional differences. But
I'm not sure where to find this type of astrophysics sort of stuff. I think it'd freak me out a bit if I did have an accurate hypothesis here.

This is MY research. I've never seen anyone correlate the two. I have no credentials to do so, either.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.