Michel Henry

The Life and the Work of Michel Henry

Biography

Michel Henry was a French philosopher and novelist who was born 10 January
at Haiphong (Vietnam) and who died 3 July 2002 at Albi (France).

Michel Henry has lived until 7 years old in Vietnam where he has lost his
father very early, who was an officer in the French Navy. He has then settled
in France with his mother and has studied in Paris. He has discovered a real
passion for the philosophy that has led him to the desire to do it his profession.
From June 1943, he committed into the Resistance where he has joined the maquis
of the Haut Jura under the code name of Kant, and he had to go down again from
the mountain to accomplish his missions in Lyon occupied by the Germans and
covered by the Nazis, an experience of clandestineness that has deeply marked
his philosophy.

At the end of the War, he has passed the agrégation of philosophy
examination, and then devoted his time to the preparation of a thesis under
the direction of J. Hyppolite, J. Wahl, P. Ricoeur, F. Alquié and H. Gouhier. He
has first written his book on the "philosophy and phenomenology of the body"
ended in 1950, and then his first published large book about "the essence of the
manifestation" and to which he as consecrated long years of research necessary
to surmount the main deficiency of all intellectualist philosophy which is the
ignorance of the life as every one experience it.

Michel Henry has been from 1960 professor of philosophy at the University of
Montpellier where he has patiently edified his work keeping himself away from
the philosophical fashions and far from the dominant ideologies. The only
subject of his philosophy, that's the living subjectivity, that's to say the
real life of the living individuals, this life who crosses all his work and
ensures its deep unity despite of the diversity of the tackled themes.
[He has proposed the deepest theory of the subjectivity
of the twentieth century.]

A Phenomenology of Life

The work of Michel Henry is based on phenomenology, which is the science of the
phenomenon. The English word "phenomenon" comes from the Greek word "phainomenon" which
means "that which shows itself by coming into the light". The object of phenomenology
is not however what appears, such a particular thing or phenomena, but the act of
appearing itself. His thought leads him to the reversal of the Husserl phenomenology, which
knows as phenomenon only the appear of the world, that's to say the exteriority.
Michel Henry opposes to this conception of the phenomenality a radical
phenomenology of life.

Michel Henry defines life in a phenomenological point of view as what
possesses the faculty and the power to "feel and to experience oneself in every
point of its being". For Michel Henry, life is essentially force and affect,
it is invisible by essence, it consists in a pure experience of itself which
oscillates permanently between suffering and joy, it is an always begun
again passage from suffering to joy. Thought is just for him a mode of life,
because this is not thought that gives access to life, but this is life that
allows thought to reach itself.

Life can never be seen from the exterior, it never appears in the exteriority
of the world. Life feels itself and experience itself in its invisible
interiority and in its radical immanence. In the world we never see life itself,
but only living beings or living organisms, we cannot see life in them. It is as
well impossible to see the soul of others with our eyes or to perceive it at the
end of our scalpel.

Our life is not its own foundation, we don't have brought ourselves
and by our own means in the condition of living, life is given to us
permanently and we are for nothing in this fact. None has ever given himself life.
We undergo life in a radical passivity, we are reduced to bear it permanently as what
we have not wanted, that's this radical passivity of life which is
the foundation and the cause of suffering. At the same time, the simple
fact of living, of being alive and of feeling oneself instead of being
nothing and of not existing is already the highest joy and the greatest
of the happiness. Suffering and joy belong to the essence of life, they
are the two fundamental affective tonalities tonalities of its manifestation
and of its "pathetic" self-revelation (from the French word pathétique which means
capable of feeling something like suffering or joy).

For Michel Henry, life is not an universal, blind, impersonal and abstract
substance, it is necessarily the personal and concrete life of a living
individual, it carries in it a consubstantial Ipseity which refers to the fact
of being itself, to the fact of being a Self. That this life is the personal and
finite life of men, or the personal and infinite life of God.

Two Modes of Manifestation

According to Michel Henry, two modes of manifestation of the phenomena exist
that are two ways of appearing : the exteriority which is the mode of
manifestation of the visible world, and the phenomenological interiority which
is the mode of manifestation of the invisible life. Our body for example is
given to us from the inner in the life which allows us for example to move our
hand or to feel it, and it appears also from the exterior as any other object
that we can see in the world.

This invisible we speak about doesn't correspond to what is too small to be
seen with the naked eyes or to radiation to which our eye is not sensible, but
to this life forever invisible because it is radically immanent and it never
appears in the exteriority of the world : nobody has ever seen a force, a
thought or a feeling in their inner reality appearing in the world, nobody has
ever found them digging into the clay layers of the ground.

Some of his assertions seem paradoxical and difficult to understand at first
sight, not only because they are extracted from their context, but above all
because of our thinking habits which lead us to reduce everything to its visible
appearance in the world instead of reaching its invisible reality in the
life. That's this separation between the visible appearance and the invisible
reality which allows the dissimulation of our real feelings and which founds
the possibility of sham and hypocrisy which are forms of lies.

The Originality of his Thought

Western philosophy as a whole since its Greek origins recognizes only the visible
world and exteriority as the single mode of manifestation, it is trapped into
what Michel Henry calls in The essence of manifestation the "ontological
monism", it ignores completely the invisible interiority of life, its radical
immanence and its original revelation mode which is irreducible to any form of
transcendence and to any exteriority. When it is question of subjectivity or of
life, they are never grasped in their purity, they are always reduced to
biological life, to their external link to the world, or as in Husserl to an
intentionality, that's to say an orientation of consciousness to an external
object.

Michel Henry rejects materialism, which admits only matter as reality,
because the manifestation of matter itself into the transcendence of the world
presupposes constantly the revelation of life itself, in order to access to it,
to be able to see it or to touch it. He rejects as well idealism, which reduces
being to thought and is incapable by principle to grasp the reality of being
which it reduces to an unreal image, to a simple representation. For Michel
Henry, the revelation of the absolute resides into affectivity and is
constituted by it.

The deep originality of Michel Henry's thought and its radical novelty in
relation to all anterior philosophy explains its quite limited reception, a
philosophy nevertheless admirable by its rigor and by its depth. But it is a
thought both difficult and demanding, even if the central and unique theme of
phenomenological life which experience it tries to communicate is what is the
most simple and immediate. An immediacy and an absolute transparency of life
which explains the difficulty to grasp it by means of thought : it is much
easier to speak of what we see than of this invisible life which escapes by
principle to any external look.

The Reception of his Philosophy

His thesis on The essence of manifestation has been welcome warmly by
the members of the jury who have recognized the intellectual value and the
serious of its author, nevertheless this thesis doesn't had any influence on
their later works. His prophetic book on Marx has been rejected by
Marxists who where harshly criticized, as well as by those who refused to see in
Marx a philosopher and who reduced him to an ideologue responsible from Marxism.
His book on The barbarism has been considered by some people as a quite
simplistic and too sharp anti-scientific discourse. Nevertheless technique
continues its blind and without limit development too often in the contempt of
life.

His books on Christianity seem to have quite disappointed some professional
theologians and catholic exegetes who have only picked out and corrected what they
considered as "dogmatic errors". His phenomenology of Life has been the object of
a pamphlet in The theological turn of the French phenomenology (Le tournant
théologique de la phénoménologie fran§aise) from Dominique Janicaud who sees in
the immanence of life only the affirmation of a tautological interiority. Nevertheless
Antoine Vidalin has just published a book in French entitled The word of Life
(La parole de la Vie) where he shows that the phenomenology of Michel Henry
allows a renewed approach of all the domains of theology.

As says Alain David in an article published in the French journal Revue
philosophique de la France et de l'Etranger (number 3, July - September 2001),
the thought of Michel Henry seems too radical, its changes too deeply our
thinking habits, its reception is quite difficult, even if all his readers
say themselves impressed by its
"power", by the "staggering effect" of a thought which "brushes all on its
passage", which "provokes admiration", but nevertheless "doesn't really
convinces". Because we don't know if we are confronted to "the violence of a
prophetic word or to pure madness". Rolf K hn asserts also in this same
philosophical journal, in order to explain the difficult reception of Michel
Henry's work, that "if we take sides with no power of this world, we inevitably
submit oneself to the silence and to the critics of all possible power,
because we recall to all institution that its visible or apparent power is,
in fact only powerlessness, because nobody gives himself into the absolute
phenomenological life."

His books have nevertheless been translated in many languages, notably in
English, in Deutsche, in Spanish, in Italian, in Portuguese and in Japanese. An
important number of books have been consecrated to his thought, mainly in
French, but also in Deutsche, in Spanish and in Italian. Several seminars have
also been consecrated to the thought of Michel Henry in Beirut, Cerisy, Namur,
Prague and Paris. Michel Henry is considered by those who know his work and
recognize its value as one of the major contemporaneous philosophers, and his
phenomenology starts to "win a following". A Center of Michel Henry
studies has even been created in the Saint-Joseph University of Beirut
(Lebanon) under the direction of Professor Jad Hatem.

Applications of his Philosophy

On the problems of society

Marx

Michel Henry has done an important work on Karl Marx, which he considers
paradoxically as one of the first Christian thinkers and as one of the most
important western philosophers, because of the importance he gives in his
thought to the living work and to the living individual in which he sees the
foundation of the economic reality. The fact that the real thought of Marx has
been so badly understood and so badly interpreted is due to the complete
ignorance of the fundamental philosophical writings of this author in the
constitution of the official doctrine of the Marxism because of their very late
publication, for example in 1932 only for The German Ideology. This work
on Marx has been translated in English under the title Marx. A Philosophy of
Human Being.

The Barbarism

In his essay on The Barbarism, Michel Henry questions himself on science,
which is founded on the idea of an universal and thus objective truth and which
therefore leads to the elimination of sensible qualities of the world, of
sensibility and of life. The science is not bad by itself as long as it
restricts to study nature, but it tends to exclude all others traditional
cultures, namely art, ethic and religion. Science delivered to itself leads to
the technique whose blind processes develop by themselves in a monstrous way
without reference to life.

Science is a way of culture in which life denies
itself and refuses itself any value, it is a practical negation of life, which
goes on in a theoretical negation in the way of all the ideologies which bring
back all possible knowledge to that of science, namely human sciences whose
objectivity itself deprive them of their object : what is the value of
statistics about suicide, what do they say about the despair it proceeds
from ? These ideologies have invaded the university and throw it to its
destruction by the elimination of life from its searches and from its teaching.
Television is the truth of technique, it is the practice par excellence of the
barbarism, it reduces all event to current events, to incoherent and
insignificant facts.

This negation of life results according to Michel Henry from the "disease
of life", from its secret dissatisfaction of oneself which leads it to deny
itself, to run away from itself in order to escape its anguish and its own
suffering. In the modern world, we are almost all condemned from our childhood
to run away our anguish and our own life in the mediocrity of the media universe,
an escape of oneself and a dissatisfaction which lead to violence, instead
of resorting to the traditional and more elaborated forms of culture which
allowed the surpassing of this suffering and its transformation into joy.
Culture subsists only clandestinely and in a kind of incognito in our
materialist society which is sinking into barbarism.

From Communism to Capitalism

Communism and Capitalism are for Michel Henry the two faces of a same death,
which consists in a same negation of the life. The Marxism eliminates the
individual life to the benefit of universal abstractions like society, people,
history or social classes. The Marxism is a way of fascism, that's to say a
doctrine which originates in the degradation of the individual whose elimination
is considered as legitimate. While Capitalism substitutes economic entities such
as money, profit or interest to the real needs of life. Capitalism recognizes
however the life as source of value, the salary being the objective
representation of the real subjective and living work. But Capitalism gives up
progressively the place to the exclusion of the subjectivity by the modern
technique, which replaces the living work by automated technical processes,
eliminating at the same time the power of creating value and then the value
itself : the possessions are produced in abundance, but the unemployment
increases and money constantly lakes to buy them. These themes are developed in
his book From Communism to Capitalism, Theory of a Catastrophe

The Book of the Dead

The next book he intended to write must have been entitled
The Book of the Dead and dealing with what he called the "clandestine
subjectivity". A theme that evokes the condition of the life in the modern
world et which is also probably an allusion to his commitment in the Resistance
movement and his personal experience of clandestineness.

On art and painting

Michel Henry was a great admirer and connoisseur of the ancient painting, of
the great classical painting that precedes the scientist derived figuration of the
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, but also of the abstract creations that
result from an authentic spiritual quest as those of the founder of the abstract
art, the painter Wassily Kandinsky.
Michel Henry has consecrated him a very fine book entitled Seeing the
invisible where he describes his work in magnificent terms. He analyses in this
book the theoretical writings of Kandinsky about the art and about the painting
in their spiritual and cultural dimensions as a way of increasing of oneself and
of refinement of our sensibility. He explores the means of the painting that are
the forms and the colors, he studies their effects on the inner life of the one
who looks at them filled with wonder, following the rigorous and nearly
phenomenological analysis proposed by Kandinsky. He explains us that all form of
painting able to rouse us is in reality abstract, that's to say it doesn't
content with reproducing the world, but looks for expressing this invisible
power and this invisible life that we are. He evokes also the great thought of
Kandinsky, the synthesis of the arts, their unity in the monumental art as well
as the cosmic dimension of the art.

On Christianity

I am the Truth

Life loves itself in an infinite love and never stops to generate itself, it
never stops to generate each one of us as his beloved Son or Daughter in the
eternal present of the life. The Life is nothing but this absolute of love that
the religion calls God. That's why the Life is sacred and this is for this reason
that nobody has the right to attack others or to hurt them. The problem of the evil is
that of death, that's to say of the degeneration from this original condition of
Son of God, when the life turns against itself in the hate and the resentment.
Because as says John in his first epistle, anyone who does not love remains in death,
whereas everyone who loves has been born of God. The commandment of love is not an
ethical law, but the Life itself. Those themes are developed in his book I Am
the Truth. Toward a Philosophy of Christianity.

This book proposes also a phenomenology of Christ, who is understood
as the First Living. The living is just what reaches itself in this pure
revelation of oneself or self-revelation that is Life. That's in the form
of an effective and singular Ipseity that Life never ceases to generate
itself. It never ceases to occur in the form of a singular Self that
embraces itself, experiences itself and enjoys itself, and that Michel
Henry calls the First Living. Or also the Arch-Son, as he inhabits the
Origin, the very Beginning, and as he is engendered in the very process
whereby the Father engenders himself.

The coming of Christ into the world aims to make the true Father
manifest to people, and thus to save them from the oblivion of Life
where they stand. An oblivion which leads them to feel themselves
falsely as being at the source of their own powers, of their own
pleasures and of their own feelings, and to leave in the terrifying
lack of what gives nevertheless each ego to himself. The plenitude
of life and the feeling of satisfaction it brings, this must yield
to the great Rift, to the Desire that no object can fulfill, to the
Hunger that nothing can satisfy.

Words of the Christ

As he has said in his latest book Words of the Christ, that's in the
heart that the life speaks, in its immediate pathetic self-revelation, but this
heart is blind to the Truth, it is deaf to the word of
the Life, it is hard and selfish, and that's from it that comes the evil. That's
in the violence of its silent and implacable self-revelation, who testifies
against this degenerated life and against the evil that comes from it, that
stands the Judgment which is identical to the coming of each Self in itself and
to which nobody can escape.

Incarnation

In his book Incarnation, a philosophy of the flesh, Michel Henry
starts with the opposition of the sensible and living flesh, as we experience it
permanently from the inside, to our inert and material body, as we can see it
from the outside, similar to the other objects we can find in the world. The
flesh doesn't fit at all in his terminology with the soft part of our material
and objective body, by opposition to the bones for example, but to what he
called in his previous books our subjective body. For Michel Henry, an
object doesn't possess interiority, it is not living, it doesn't feel itself and
doesn't feel that it is touched, it doesn't do the subjective experience
of being touched.

After having placed the difficult problem of the incarnation
in an historical perspective going back to the thought of the Fathers of the
Church, he makes in this book a critical review of the phenomenological
tradition that leads to the reversal of phenomenology. He then proposes to
elaborate a phenomenology of the flesh which leads to the notion of a not
constituted original flesh given in the "Arch-revelation" of Life, as well as a
phenomenology of Incarnation.

Although the flesh is traditionally understood as the place of sin, it is
also in Christianity the place of salvation, which consists in the deification
of man, that's to say in the fact of becoming Son of God, to come back to the
eternal and absolute Life we had forgotten getting lost in the world, caring
only about things and ourselves. In the fault, we make the tragic experience of
our powerlessness to do the good we would like to do and of our inability to
avoid the evil. In this way in front of the magic body of the other, that's the
anguished desire to meet the life in it that leads to the fault. In the night of
the lovers, the sexual act couples two impulsive movements, but the erotic
desire fails to reach the pleasure of the other where it is experienced, in a
total loving fusion. The erotic relation is however doubled by a pure affective
relation, foreign to the carnal coupling, a relation made of mutual gratitude or
of love. That's this affective dimension that is denied in this way of violence
that is pornography, which extracts the erotic relation from the pathos of life
to abandon it to the world, and which consists in a real profanation of
life.

On psychoanalysis

Michel Henry has done a study of the historical and philosophical genesis of
the psychoanalysis in the light of the phenomenology of the life in his book
Genealogy of the psychoanalysis, the lost beginning, in which he shows
that the Freudian notion of unconscious results from the incapacity of Freud,
its founder, to think the essence of the life in its purity. The repressed
representation is not
unconscious, it is only not formed : the unconscious is only an empty
representation, it doesn't exists, or rather the real unconscious, that's the
life itself in its pathetic reality. And that's not the repression that provokes
the anguish, whose existence is only due to the fact to be able to act, but the
unused psychic energy or libido. As for the notion of consciousness, it simply
means the power of seeing, it is only a consciousness of object which leads to
an empty subjectivity.

Some quotes from Michel Henry

On affectivity

"That which is felt without the intermediary of any sense whatsoever
is in its essence affectivity." (The essence of the manifestation,
§ 52)

"Affectivity has ever accomplished its work when the world rises."
(The Essence of Manifestation, § 54)

"The suffering makes up the tissue of the existence, it is the place where
the life becomes living, the reality and the phenomenological effectivity of
this gradual change." (The Essence of Manifestation, § 70)

"The power of the feeling is the gathering which edifies, the being seized
by oneself, its blazing up, its fulguration, is the becoming of the being, the
triumphant sudden appearance of the revelation. What becomes of, in the
triumph of this sudden appearance, in the fulguration of the presence, in the
Parousia and, lastly, when there is something instead of nothing, that's the
joy." (The Essence of Manifestation, § 70)

"But joy has nothing about which it may be joyful. Far to come after
the coming of the being and to marvel in front of it, joy is
consubstantial with the being, joy founds it and forms it."
(The Essence of Manifestation, § 70)

"The community is a subterranean affective water table and each one drinks
the same water at this source and at this well that he is." (Material
phenomenology)

On the Problems of Society

"The Marxism is the whole of the misinterpretations that have been done
about Marx." (Marx, a philosophy of reality)

"The culture is the whole of the enterprises and of the practices in which
the abundance of life expresses itself, they all have as motivation the 'load',
the 'over' which disposes inwardly the living subjectivity as a force ready
to give unstintingly itself and constraint, under the load, to do it." (The Barbarism)

"The barbarism is an unused energy." (The Barbarism)

"So it's not the self-realization that the media existence proposes to
the life, it's the escape, the opportunity for all those whose laziness,
repressing their energy, make them forever dissatisfied of themselves to
forget this dissatisfaction." (The Barbarism)

"No abstraction, no ideality has never been neither in position to produce
a real action nor, by consequence, what only represents it." (From
communism to capitalism)

"When what feels nothing and doesn't feel oneself, has no desire and no
love, is put at the principle of the organization of the world, it's the time
of madness that comes, because the madness has all lost except the reason."
(From communism to capitalism)

On art and painting

"The spectacle of the beauty which embodies itself in a living being is
infinitely more touching than that of the work the more grandiose." (L'amour
les yeux fermés)

"The one who will want to represent this force will represent a column,
the heavy blocs of stone of the pediment and of the roof, he will
represent the temple, represent the world. Briesen draws the force of the
music, the original force of the Suffering and of the Life : he draws
nothing." (Article 'Drawing the music, theory for the art of
Briesen', in Phénoménologie de la vie, tome III)

"We look at petrified, motionless them also or evolving slowly on the
background of a nocturnal firmament, the hieroglyphs of the invisible. We look
at them : forces that lay dormant in us and waited since millenniums,
since the beginning, obstinately, patiently, forces that explode in the
violence and the gleam of the colors, which unroll the spaces and generate the
forms of the worlds, forces of the cosmos have raised themselves in us, they
carry us along out of the time in the round dance of their jubilation and do
not give us up, they don't stop because even them did not think it was
possible to reach 'such an happiness'. The art is the resurrection
of the eternal life." (Seeing the invisible, on Kandinsky)

On Christianity

"I hear for ever the noise of my birth." (I Am the Truth. Toward a
philosophy of Christianity)

"To be born is not to come into the world. To be born is to come into
life." (I Am the Truth. Toward a philosophy of Christianity)

"But then, when and why is this emotional upheaval produced, which opens
a person to his own essence ? Nobody knows. The emotional opening of the person
to his own essence can only be born of the will of life itself, as this rebirth
that lets him suddenly experience his eternal birth. The Spirit blows where
it wills." (I Am the Truth. Toward a philosophy of Christianity)

"No object has ever done the experience of being touched."
(Incarnation, a philosophy of the flesh)

"So my flesh is not only the principle of the constitution of my objective
body, it hides in it its invisible substance. Such is the strange condition of
this object that we call a body : it doesn't consist at all in the
visible appearance to which we reduce it since forever ; in its reality
precisely it is invisible. Nobody has ever seen a man, but nobody has ever
seen his body as well, if by 'body' we understand his real body."
(Incarnation, a philosophy of the flesh)

"Our flesh caries in it the principle of its manifestation, and this
manifestation is not the appearing of the world. In its pathetic
self-impressionality, in its flesh itself, given to itself in the
Arch-passibility of the absolute Life, it reveals this one which reveals it to
itself, it is in its pathos the Arch-revelation of Life, the Parousia of the
absolute. On the bottom of its Night, our flesh is God." (Incarnation, a
philosophy of the flesh)

"Life is uncreated. Foreign to creation, foreign to the world, every
process conferring Life is a process of generation." (Words of Christ)

Description of selected titles

On the problems of society

The Babarism (La barbarie) : The culture, which is the
self-development of the life, is threatened in our society by the barbarism of
the monstrous objectivity of the technoscience, whose ideologies reject all
form of subjectivity, while the life is condemned to escape his anguish in the
media universe.

From Communism to Capitalism, Theory of a Catastrophe (Du communisme
au capitalisme, théorie d'une catastrophe) : The collapse of the eastern
communist systems corresponds to the failure of a system that pretended to
deny the reality of life to the benefit of abstractions wrongly universals.
But the death is also to the appointment in the empire of the capitalism and
of the modern technique.

On Art and Painting

Seeing the Invisible, on Kandinsky (Voir l'invisible, sur Kandinsky) :
The art can save from his confusion the abandoned man of our technical civilization.
This is this quest that has led Kandinsky to the creation of the abstract painting.
This is no longer a matter to represent the world but our inner life, with lines
and colors that correspond to forces and inner sonorities.

On Christianity

I am the Truth: Toward a Philosophy of Christianity (C'est moi
la Vérité, pour une philosophie du christianisme) : This book explains the
kind of truth that Christianity tries to transmit to men. The Christianity
opposes to the truth of the world the Truth of Life, according to which the
man is the Son of God. The self-revelation of the Life who experience itself
in its invisible interiority is the essence of God that founds any individual.
In the world, Jesus has the appearance of a man, but that's in the Truth of
the Life that he is the Christ, the First Living.

Incarnation, a Philosophy of the Flesh (Incarnation, une philosophie
de la chair) : The living flesh opposes radically to the material body.
Because this is the flesh which, experiencing oneself, enjoying of oneself
according to always reviving impressions, is able to feel the body which is
exterior to it, to touch it and to be touched by it. That's the flesh which
allows us to know the body. The fundamental word of the prologue to John's
Gospel, who says that the Word became flesh, asserts this improbable thesis
that God has embodied in a mortal flesh like ours, it asserts the unity of the
Word and the flesh in Christ. What is the flesh to be the place of God's
revelation, and in what consists in this revelation ?

Words of Christ (Paroles du Christ) : Can the man understand
in his own language the word of God, a word that speaks in an other
language ? The words of the Christ seem to many people of an immoderate
claim because they do not only claim to transmit the truth or a divine
revelation, but to be itself this Revelation and this Truth, the Word of God
himself, of this God that the Christ says to be himself.

Literary Works

The young officer (Le jeune officier) : This first novel
evokes the struggle of a young officer against the evil embodied by rats on a
ship.

Love with closed eyes (L'amour les yeux fermés) : This novel
which has obtained the Renaudot price is the account of the destruction of a
city arrived at the top of its development and of its refinement and which is
suffering from an insidious evil.

The son of the King (Le fils du roi) : This book is the story
of the life locked up in a psychiatric hospital and confronted to the
rationality of the psychiatrists.

The indiscreet corpse (Le cadavre indiscret) : This novel
tells us the anxiety of the assassins of the too honest occult treasurer of a
political party which finance an investigation to know what is really known
about then and to reassure themselves.

External links

Encouraged reproduction

Original version of the article on Michel Henry written by
Philippe Audinos and added to the free encyclopedia Wikipedia on the site
http://www.wikipedia.com. The sentences
or paragraphs under square brackets have been translated from French contributions
of other Wikipedians. This text can be freely reproduced and diffused under the
condition to keep the reference to Wikipedia.