Addressing threats to health care's core values, especially those stemming from concentration and abuse of power. Advocating for accountability, integrity, transparency, honesty and ethics in leadership and governance of health care.

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Are Million Dollar Plus Business Trained Managers the Right People to Lead Health Care in the Time of Ebola?

You can guess my opinion on the answer.

Introduction

News and opinions about Ebola virus are swirling around the US, fueled by a tragic epidemic in West Africa, and fears that more infections could appear here. On October 6, 2014, I posted my concerns that despite a tremendous amount of confidence expressed by government officials and health care leaders, our dysfunctional health care system might have trouble containing Ebola virus. Less than two weeks later, my concerns do not seem so extreme. The first patient to be diagnosed with Ebola virus in the US has died. Two nurses who cared for him now have the virus.

There seem to be millions of words on paper and on the internet about Ebola appearing every day. So I certainly do not want to try to deal with the problem in all its aspects. I do want to revisit a particular set of issues from my October 6 post: the hazards posed by generic management deluded by business school dogma running health care institutions in the time of Ebola. In particular, my focus is the management of the US hospital at which one patient died, and two nurses were infected, based on what has come out since October 6.

The Incoherence of Hospital Leaders

On October 6, we noted that the hospital, Texas Health Presbyterian, part of the Texas Health Resources hospital system, had issued conflicting and confusing statements about why the first Ebola patient, Mr Thomas Eric Duncan, was sent home from the hospital when he first presented. The first specific statement by hospital managers was that there had been a problem with the hospital's electronic health record (EHR), as had been suspected by my fellow Health Care Renewal blogger, InformaticsMD. Then the hospital retracted that statement, but provided no explanation with which to replace it.

Since then, there have been more inconsistencies in statements made by hospital managers.

Fever or No Fever?

First hospital managers said Mr Duncan arrived without a fever, but then review of his medical records indicated his temperature was as high as 103 degrees F while he was in the hospital, a fever high enough that it might reasonably have prompted admission given his other symptoms, even if Ebola was not a concern. (See this Dallas Morning News story.)

The staff at Texas Health
Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas did a run-through just last week of
procedures to follow if the deadly virus landed in Dallas.

'We
were prepared,' Dr. Edward Goodman, an epidemiologist at Texas Health
Presbyterian, said Tuesday in a news conference. 'We have had a plan in
place for some time now in the event of a patient presenting with
possible Ebola. We are well-prepared to deal with this crisis.'

Presbyterian
said it is following recommendations from the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention and the Texas Department of Health in responding
to the patient, described as being 'critically ill' at the hospital in
northeast Dallas.

All precautions are being taken to protect doctors, nurses and others in the hospital, officials said.

Sadly, this statement soon seemed, as one politician once said, inoperative. an October 14 Washington Post article described how hospital health professionals had to essentially make up their procedures as they went along.

The hospital that treated Ebola victim Thomas Eric Duncan had to learn on the fly how to control the deadly virus, adding new layers of protective gear
for workers in what became a losing battle to keep the contagion from
spreading, a top official with the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention said Tuesday.

'They kept adding more protective
equipment as the patient [Duncan] deteriorated. They had masks first,
then face shields, then the positive-pressure respirator. They added a
second pair of gloves,' said Pierre Rollin, a CDC epidemiologist.

Also,

He said the hospital originally had no full-body biohazard suits
equipped with respirators but now has about a dozen. Protocols evolved
at the hospital while Duncan was being treated, he said: 'Collecting
samples, with needles, then you have to have two people, one to watch. I
think when the patient arrived they didn’t have someone to watch.'

Worse, in the last 24 hours, there have been reports by anonymous people said to be nurses at Texas Health Presbyterian that the hospital was clearly not ready, per the Los Angeles Times,

The nurses' statement alleged that when Duncan was brought to Texas
Health Presbyterian by ambulance with Ebola-like symptoms, he was 'left
for several hours, not in isolation, in an area' where up to seven other
patients were. 'Subsequently, a nurse supervisor arrived and demanded
that he be moved to an isolation unit, yet faced stiff resistance from
other hospital authorities,' they alleged.

Duncan's lab samples were sent through the usual hospital tube system 'without being specifically sealed and hand-delivered. The result is
that the entire tube system … was potentially contaminated,' they said.

The
statement described a hospital with no clear rules on how to handle
Ebola patients, despite months of alerts from the U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta about the possibility of Ebola
coming to the United States.

'There was no advanced preparedness
on what to do with the patient. There was no protocol. There was no
system. The nurses were asked to call the infectious disease department'
if they had questions, but that department didn't have answers either,
the statement said. So nurses were essentially left to figure things out
on their own as they dealt with 'copious amounts' of highly contagious
bodily fluids from the dying Duncan while they wore gloves with no wrist
tape, flimsy gowns that did not cover their necks, and no surgical
booties, the statement alleged.

In response, the official hospital statement (authored by one Wendell Watson, "a Presbyterian spokesman," according to the AP) contained vague assurances, but no specific responses to the allegations,

'Patient and employee safety is our greatest priority, and we take
compliance very seriously,' the hospital said in a statement. 'We have
numerous measures in place to provide a safe working environment,
including mandatory annual training and a 24-7 hotline and other
mechanisms that allow for anonymous reporting. Our nursing staff is
committed to providing quality, compassionate care, as we have always
known, and as the world has seen firsthand in recent days. We will
continue to review and respond to any concerns raised by our nurses and
all employees.'

So while hospital officials (and local and national politicians and government leaders) kept up reassuring statements that our sophisticated, high-technology hospitals were totally ready to deal with a disease like Ebola, the reality appeared far different.

Other Inconsistencies

According to a USA Today story, other inconsistencies included hospital statements about the date Mr Duncan's diagnosis was confirmed, and whether or not the hospital was diverting ambulances.

Were Health Professionals Silenced?

Of course, given the suddenness of the arrival of Ebola in the US, the acuity of the first patient, and the general atmosphere of panic, initial confusion in public statements however critical the information they were meant to contain may be, is understandable.

However, there are now allegations that hospital management was not merely confused, but trying to keep critical information secret, and the allegations do not seem incredible.

In a Washington Post story on October 12, about how many US hospitals seem not well prepared for Ebola infected patients, appeared this from Bonnie Castillo, director of Registered Nurse Response Network, part of the union, National Nurses United,

Castillo said the union has been trying to contact nurses at Texas
Health Presbyterian Hospital, where Thomas Eric Duncan, the Liberian man
diagnosed with Ebola, died Wednesday.

'That hospital has issued a
directive to all hospital staff not to speak to press,' Castillo said. 'That is a grave concern because we need to hear from those front-line
workers. We need to hear what happened there. … They have them on real
lockdown. There is great fear. This hospital is not represented by a
union. Our sense is they are afraid to speak out.'

The Dallas nurses asked the union to read their statement so they could
air complaints anonymously and without fear of losing their jobs,
National Nurses United Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro said from
Oakland.

the labor organization National Nurses United read a statement that it
said came from nurses at the hospital who 'strongly feel unsupported,
unprepared, lied to and deserted to handle their own situation.'

The Presbyterian
nurses are not represented by Nurses United or any other union. DeMoro
and Burger said the nurses claimed they had been warned by the hospital
not to speak to reporters or they would be fired.

The
AP has attempted since last week to contact dozens of individuals
involved in Duncan's care. Those who responded to reporters' inquiries
have so far been unwilling to speak.

Covering up information vitally needed by health care professionals, other institutions, the government, etc to better manage a potentially fatal disease that is already epidemic in other countries appears completely unethical. Doing so to preserve the reputation of managers seems reprehensible. But the implication of the recent stories is that is what happened.

Why Hospital Managers May Not Deserve Our Trust

The US has had no recent experience with any disease like Ebola. So that mistakes, sometimes very serious ones, were made in the management of the first Ebola patients is not a big surprise.

What may be a big surprise to many Americans is how untrustworthy health care leaders, and in particular the managers of Health Texas Presbyterian hospital and its parent system, Health Texas Resources now appear. After all, USA Today published on October 14, "Texas Health Presbyterian was a respected, renowned hospital." While even people at respected, renowned institutions make mistakes when confronted with sudden, unfamiliar problems, should not the institution's leaders at least be trusted to in their public pronouncements?

Instead, it appears that the leaders appeared tremendously overconfident, and worse, may have silenced employees from raising concerns that could have reflected badly on leadership. This occurred in a context in which transparency was imperative so that other people who might have to deal with Ebola patients might be better prepared.

On the other hand, based on what we have been posting on Health Care Renewal for nearly 10 years, the conduct of the Texas Health Resources leaders should have come as no surprise. On Health Care Renewal we
have been connecting the dots among severe problems with cost, quality
and access on one hand, and huge problems with concentration and abuse
of power, enabled by leadership of health care organizations that is ill-informed, incompetent, unsympathetic or hostile to health care professionals' values, self-interested, conflicted, dishonest, or even corrupt and governance that fails to foster transparency, accountability, ethics and honesty.

We have seen many examples of hospital executives who seemed vastly impressed by their own brilliance, egged on by board members who were themselves executives of other organizations, and by marketing and public relations functionaries dependent on these executives for their own career advancement. In particular, we have posted examples of hospital CEOs and other top executives making millions of dollars a year based on their supposed "brilliance," or "visionary" capacity, at least according to the board members who supposed to be exercising stewardship over their institutions, and the public relations people they hired. Such brilliance has often been asserted, but rarely been explained or justified (The latest example was here, and much more discussion is here.)

Most such ostensibly "brilliant" hospital executives had no direct experience in clinical care, public health, or biomedical science.

Making hospital leaders feel entitled to make more and more money regardless
of their or their institutions' performance seems to be a recipe for "CEO Disease," leading to disconnected, unaccountable, self-interested leaders. Hospital leaders suffering from the CEO disease may be particularly willing to countenance suppression of any facts or ideas that might raise doubts about their brilliance.

So the leadership of Texas Health Resources may in fact be very typical of that of large non-profit hospital systems. THR is such a system. A Dallas Morning News article about Mr Doug Hawthorne, the Texas Health Resources CEO who just retired in September, 2014, stated

In 1997, Doug Hawthorne helped reshape the health care industry in North
Texas by leading the creation of Texas Health Resources, an alliance of
Presbyterian Healthcare Resources, Harris Methodist Health System and
Arlington Memorial Hospital.

By 2014,

With more than 22,000 employees in fully owned and joint venture
operations, Texas Health is one of the largest care providers in North
Texas. For its 2012 fiscal year, it had $3.7 billion in total operating
revenue and $5.3 billion in total assets.

For leading this system, Mr Hawthorne made a lot of money, although apparently no recent data is available on his compensation,

He was among the most highly compensated not-for-profit CEOs in the
region. For 2012, the most recent information available, his base salary
was about $1 million and his bonus was about $1.1 million.

'A healthcare visionary, Mr. Hawthorne is at the helm of one of the
largest faith-based, nonprofit health care delivery systems in the
United States, Texas Health Resources,' the Hall said in a release
announcing the induction.

Yet Mr Hawthorne had no direct patient care experience, public health experience, or biomedical or clinical science experience. Mr Hawthorne is on the board of directors of the LHP Hospital Group Inc, a for-profit that provides capital and services to non-profit hospitals. The official bio, posted by LHP stated his educational background only included

B.S. and M.S. degrees in healthcare administration from Trinity University in San Antonio.

Furthermore, as we mentioned earlier, the current CEO of Texas Health Resources, Mr Barclay E Berden, who has only been on the job since September 1, 2014, also was hailed by system board of trustees for his "unique leadership strengths." His current compensation is unknown, but I would guess is likely over $1 million/year. He highest degree is a MBA, and like his predecessor, had much experience in hospital management, but apparently none in clinical care, public health, or biomedical science.

Summary

Texas Health Resources' recent CEOs have been paid millions, and hailed for their brilliance, despite a lack of any direct experience in health care, public health, or biomedical science. Leaders convinced of their own brilliance may live in bubbles that prevent penetration of any ideas or facts that may challenge that brilliance, making them thus susceptible to hubris.

So should we have been surprised that the leadership of the first US hospital system to directly confront Ebola de novo seemed more concerned with polishing their supposed brilliance than with transparently providing the information that other people who have to confront Ebola in the future so greatly need?

No, but one tiny silver lining to the time of Ebola is that it may make it glaringly obvious that we need true health care reform that focuses on reforming the leadership of big health care organizations. In particular, we need leadership that is well-informed about health care and public health; that upholds the values of health care professionals, specifically by putting patients' and the public's health ahead of their own remuneration; is willing to be held accountable; and is honest and unconflicted.

Allowing the current dysfunction to continue, while it will be very profitable to the insiders who run the system, will continue to enable tragic outcomes for patients and the public.

A brilliant analysis of what went wrong in this hospital, one we are not hearing on TV. It is chilling to read that ANYONE - the ambulance drivers, nurses and docters, aids and clean-up crewa, lab personnel and ALL the other patients may have or could be infected. The problem in my opinion - larger and larger hospitals, whether for profit or non -profit run like businesses, and where your own doctor who knows your history is no longer welcome.

the ER uses scribes. What happens with the scribes in my experience is a lot of generic useless documentation to cover review of systems but not necessarily accurate. Epic also uses temples with all normal values defaulted Often not even reviewed by the ER doctor.

The assignment of an Ebola czar with no medical knowledge is an astounding confirmation that the government believes the same thing as the hospitals -- doctors are inconsequential to healthcare. Administration uber alles.

Contact Us

Email: info at firmfound dot org
or go to the web-site for FIRM - the Foundation for Integrity and Responsibility in Medicine

More About FIRM and Health Care Renewal

FIRM - the Foundation for Integrity and Responsibility in Medicine is a 501(c)3 that researches problems with leadership and governance in health care that threaten core values, and disseminates our findings to physicians, health care researchers and policy-makers, and the public at large. FIRM advocates representative, transparent, accountable and ethical health care governance, and hopes to empower health care professionals and patients to promote better health care leadership.

FIRM depends on contributions from individuals and non-profit organizations. FIRM does not accept any direct support from for-profit health care corporations.

FIRM welcomes support from individuals and non-profit organizations. If you are interested in donating to FIRM, please email info at firmfound dot org, snail mail us at 16 Cutler St, Suite 104, Warren, RI, 02885, USA, or see our web-site.

Subscribe To Health Care Renewal

Policies: Blog Roll and Comments

Our blogroll is meant to include blogs that provide interesting content relevant to what we write. It is not an endorsement in any way of any specific blog.

We accept comments, especially from registered Blogger users. If you do not wish to register with Blogger, we will accept anonymous comments, although prefer that they contain identification of the commenter.

We encourage thoughtful comments relevant to the issues brought up by the posts on Health Care Renewal.

All comments are moderated. We will reject spam, profanity, advertising of products or services not directly related to the content of this blog.

We will reject any unsubstantiated accusations or allegations.

Nonetheless, all comments represent only the opinions of those making them. The appearance of comments does not imply endorsement by the Health Care Renewal bloggers.

Please email general comments about the blog, other concerns, or questions to info AT firmfound DOT org