The NCL rules must also be read in the light of the Community Disciplinary Gudelines (google it - I'm hopeless at links ) which provide for appeals in certain circumstances even when there has been a ' no show '.initially.

In this particular case the NCL management decided it was only fair to let Kilshaw take his case on appeal to Jack Strother's committee at the RFL

Don't think so. Why should a team be "saved" at the expense of Leigh East. If Easts have been relegated, the other 3 clubs who have failed must also have been relegated - but probably to div 3. A bit of a shake up in the number in each division????

Don't think so. Why should a team be "saved" at the expense of Leigh East. If Easts have been relegated, the other 3 clubs who have failed must also have been relegated - but probably to div 3. A bit of a shake up in the number in each division????

Carlsberg don't do Soldiers, but if they did, they would probably be Brits.

It was quite clear delcapo that east tried to pull the wool over the Ncl eyes and up to me finding out the truth I tried to defend them . But once the truth was out I couldn't defend that personal decision . All I can defend is the players who were blameless but will now suffer over the next few seasons that is a low point for me

Even though potentially having one more team division 2 would seem odd it wouldn't be fair to let a new club start above the bottom or to reprieve a club that has scratched IMO. Half those division 3 clubs would be strong enough to win promotion from division 2 IMO

Even though potentially having one more team division 2 would seem odd it wouldn't be fair to let a new club start above the bottom or to reprieve a club that has scratched IMO. Half those division 3 clubs would be strong enough to win promotion from division 2 IMO

has it been decided that crosfields and fev lions have been relegated due to failing fixtures. surely if leigh east have then they should too.