Abstract

Using the URL or DOI link below will
ensure access to this page indefinitely

Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:

New York, USA

Processing request.

Illinois, USA

Processing request.

Brussels, Belgium

Processing request.

Seoul, Korea

Processing request.

California, USA

Processing request.

If you have any problems downloading this paper,please click on another Download Location above, or view our FAQFile name: SSRN-id2127212. ; Size: 393K

You will receive a perfect bound, 8.5 x 11 inch, black and white printed copy of this PDF document with a glossy color cover. Currently shipping to U.S. addresses only. Your order will ship within 3 business days. For more details, view our FAQ.

Quantity:Total Price = $9.99 plus shipping (U.S. Only)

If you have any problems with this purchase, please contact us for assistance by email: Support@SSRN.com or by phone: 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 585 442 8170 outside of the United States. We are open Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:30AM and 6:00PM, United States Eastern.

Advancing Technology & Aging Democracy

In 1964, Marshall McLuhan wrote, Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. After quoting General David Sarnoff for the view that too often people “make technological instruments the scapegoats for the sins of those who wield them,” McLuhan rejects this view, or at least does not fully embrace it. Instead, McLuhan posits that the increased scale of technology affects us in ways that too often go unnoticed. McLuhan raises the Psalmist warning that “we become what we behold.” If society does not pay attention to the ways that advancing technology affects the human individual and culture, then this “somnambulism” could result in unintended and undesirable consequences for humanity. In other words, the implications of advancing technology for democracy are filled with both threats and opportunities for societal and individual improvement. It is up to us to decide the acceptable uses of technology in our lives and society.

And, so the question ought to be asked: What are the implications of an aging democracy confronted with technology that is advancing with greater speed than any other time in history? Are twenty-first century Americans up to the challenge to reflect upon and confront the implications of rapidly advancing technology on our ancestors’ eighteenth century grand experiment of democracy? Or will we, as citizens of a self-governing society, sleep at the wheel and go so far down the road before we realize what freedoms we have lost due to uses of technology that have detrimental effects on individual liberty and the ability of humans to organize social structures in a more egalitarian and person-oriented design?