Theophany wrote:YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU. someproteinguy wrote:Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist. Astarin wrote:One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? ***. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

• images of men or women posing and/or undressing in a seductive manner

Quote:

Violent content

What's the policy?

Our program policies don't allow Google ads to be placed on content that contains graphic or gory images such as bloodshed, fight scenes, and gruesome or freak accidents. Publishers are responsible for every page on which their ad code appears and for screening any text, images, videos, or other media which will appear on a page with Google ads.

Theophany wrote:YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU. someproteinguy wrote:Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist. Astarin wrote:One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.

It's also so totally broken that many websites won't work with it. We put a nice disclaimer in giant red letters on my work website that screams "Does not play nice with IE11!!1!" 95% of it works, but there's some underlying table/grid controls that were built for IE7 that we're gonna rip out and replace later this year because IE11 doesn't acknowledge they exist.

____________________________

FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014

Thayos wrote:

I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

Not that I project it to be probable that it will die off heavily, but isn't it silly to bank on 20yr competitive dominance on a project that has been around ~12 and was more or less brought operational in 3?

Yes. It was hyperbole. No one can predict anything about now + 20 years. On balance, though, I don't think it's wildly dissimilar from noticing declining network TV ad revenue in 1985 and concluding that traditional TV networks were going away.

Which is not the same as saying the current online advertising platform will be the same primary ad platform. There will absolutely be online ads. Will Google stay at the apex? I'd wager they will remain competitive, but diminish as other firms aggressively compete. Ad firms aren't incredibly stable.

I was going to leave it until Google yells at us about it. I don't think that particular word made it into the proposed word list anyways. I did remove anything I thought I could get away with, including various gender / sexual terms of description in use in general conversation and headlines of major news entities. We'll see.

we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.

I would have preferred that we instead pull all ads from all forum content and stick the forum in it's own separate namespace, but that is not happening. There is definitly an argument for that approach though. no ads, and the forum population would grow, which in turn translates to more people using the ad saturated main site sections. No one wants to test that theory though.

Using project wonderful ads or something could always be an option too, instead of just not having ads.

There will absolutely be online ads. Will Google stay at the apex? I'd wager they will remain competitive, but diminish as other firms aggressively compete.

With what leverage? Mature (from a business model standpoint) sites can book their own ad sales, and likely will, the never ending stream of newly created 'viral' content sites needs some stable solution to monetize. For someone to break that hold on the market, they need to break Google's monopoly on search. Again, 20 years is a long time, no one can really say, but good luck breaking Google's search market share.

____________________________

Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? ***. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

I'm suspecting something along the lines of people not wanting to pay to have their advertizements for chicken ******* appear on **** sites, or as suggested links next to them in search results and the like.