Socio economic gender inequality in Nigeria: A review of theory and measurements

Abstract

The aim of this article is to synthesize the various views of gender inequality and various indicators used to measure it. It argues that women lag behind men in most indicators of socio-economic development and they constitute the majority of the poor, the unemployed and the socially disadvantaged. Productive differences as espoused by the traditional neoclassical as well as the institutions and markets advancement are not sufficient to explain gender inequality. The political economy view of power and self-interest enshrined at the household, community and government play relevant role in defining gender gaps. Growth models that are institutionally blind completely leaves out the impact that social institutions such as family, school, unions, government have in shaping inequalities. The collective self-interest and power within institutions motivate men and women to allocate the resource under their control to activities that best enable them to fulfill their obligations rather than to activities that are common

Item Type:

MPRA Paper

Original Title:

Socio economic gender inequality in Nigeria: A review of theory and measurements

Dollar, David and Roberta Gatti. 1999. “Gender Inequality, Income and Growth: Are Good Times Good for Women?” World Bank Policy Research Report on Gender and Gender and Development, Development Working Paper Series, No. 1.

Kingdon, G., and Knight, J. (2001) .Why high open unemployment and small informal sector in South Africa?.Centre for the Study of African Economies, Department of Economics,University of Oxford, October 2001.

Klasen, S.2005 Pro Poor Growth and Gender: What can we learn from the Literature and the OPPG Case Studies? Discussion Paper by Stephan Klasen, University of Göttingen to the Operationalizing Pro-Poor Growth (OPPG) Working Group of AFD, DFID, BMZ (GTZ/KfW) and the World Bank siteresources.worldbank.org/

Oyekale, A.S., Adeoti, A.I. and Oyekale, T.O. 2006. Measurement and Sources of income inequality in Rural and Urban Nigeria. A paper presented during the 5th PEP Research Network general meeting. Addis ababa, Ethopia.

Palmer-Jones, Richard (2008) Microeconomic evidence On gender inequality and growth in Nigeria. School of Development Studies University of East Anglia. Draft

Quisumbing, A. R. 2003. What Have We Learned from Research on Intrahousehold Allocation? In Agnes R. Quisumbing (ed.) Household Decisions, Gender and Development: A Synthesis of Recent Research. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. 551-569.

Sahota (1978) Sahota, G.S. 1977. The Distribution of the Benefits of Public Expenditure in Panama. Public Finance Quarterly 5.2:203-30.

Scholtz, Hanno (2010) Inequality rose from above, so it shall fall again: Income skewness trends in 16 OECD countries as evidence for a second Kuznets cycle 2010 51: 246 International Journal of Comparative Sociology

Schutz, R.R., 1951. On the Measurement of income nequality. American Economic Review 41: 107-122

Teriba and Philips (1971) Teriba, O. and Philips, A. 1971. Income Distribution and National integration. The Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies 13.1: 77-122

Tzannatos, Z. 1999. “Women and Labor Market Changes in the Global Economy: Growth Helps, Inequalities Hurt and Public Policy Matters.” World Development 27(3):551-56

Udry, C. 1996. Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household. Journal of Political Economy 104 (5): 1010–1046.