Regrets for at least the first half. Once a month the eGov IG and
SPARQL conflict, on their current schedules.
-- Sandro
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 08:37 -0500, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Apologies for the very late agenda. A bit of a miscommunication between
> us chairs.
>
> Last week's minutes are at: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-01-17
>
> Today I'd like to discuss:
>
> * Test approvals
> * The implementation report at
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ shows tests that are /
> are not approved
> * I'd like to go over this, and propose approving all tests that are
> passed by both ARQ and RDF::Query.
> * We can then focus on tests that are failed by one or the other or
> not run by both.
>
> * CSV/TSV
> * A brief mail thread at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0075.html
> * We approved test cases in
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-08-16, with a bit of
> discussion about the difference between the formats (CSV is values only,
> TSV has full term information)
> * I'd like to at least discuss this: if I'm the only person
> uncomfortable with the two formats, then I'll let it go...
>
>
> Lee
>
>
>