A well-rounded account: 2 Corinthians 3
Five aspects of the Spirit's work and character in the Christian story:

These cross the Old and New Testaments
Various church practices embody our relationships with the Spirit
Certain traditions develop these as constitutive of their ecclesial identity
When one dominates the others, a tradition's 'Spirit' is weakened and it sets ourselves against others and their weak 'Spirits'

They offer resources for broader dilemmas in our intellectual culture

"Giver of life": The Spirit to Us

The breath of God in the water of creation (Genesis 1:2, 2:7, Psalm 33:6, 104:29-30)

Baptism (not as the water of Mark 1:8 or 1 John 5:6-9 but the Creator in John 3:8 and Romans 8:11a) (Anglicans, Restorationists)
Tribalism, baptismal entitlement, Deism (and their reactions)
Religion and science

"Lord": The Spirit over Us

The finger of God in Egypt and Sinai (Exodus 8:19, 31:18, Isaiah 63:7-14)

Which of these relationships sound natural, and which are shocking?
When one relationship dominates, the Spirit's (and Son's and Father's) specificity recedes behind an abstract "divine"/human relationship
Utilitarian and human-centered Christianity results, with:

impoverished community
thin spirituality
frustrated prayer
alienation from other communities with other "Spirits"
and a more distant Triune God

... because narrowing fails to honor the full shape of our graced relations with the Triune God whose relations are constitutive of their Trinity
2 Cor 3 (for example) honors all five types, revealing a richer apostolic Church than ours, and none other than the Holy Spirit