Warning; We are not a politically correct site. Don't like us? Don't read.

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Feminist word for the day, Femitheist, and male population control.

The (Idiot) Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything

Questions:

I assume The Ratio refers to your belief the male population should be reduced to between by 90 percent.

The Femitheist: I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.

Like slaves?

Not as slaves, simply as workers performing a duty, in the same way workers today do. Only without the need for monetary reimbursement as they would have no need for such a thing. This would be highly monitored and regulated. (and this isn't slavery how???)

Doesn't all this dismiss the notion of companionship and the family unit?

Heterosexual companionship and the nuclear family model, yes. (surprise, surprise, now where did we hear that before?)

But realistically that’s not what’s best for the kids?

If children are made wards of the state with assigned caretakers, not only will it be easier to undo the constraints of bigotry and the other archaic beliefs that are passed down from parents to their children, but children can be used to monitor the older generations in regard to the propagation of bigoted and antediluvian values. It is about creating a unified perception. (in other words, a hive, just like insects)

(And with feminists it always about promoting.....lesbianism)

Does this assume all women would automatically form lesbian relationships?

Relationships between females and males have been different throughout all of history. Associations between women and men differ with the time and popular socialisation. Today that is not common or normalized, but as time passes more women are interested in other women or are willing to indulge and experiment. (Before you indulge yourself, why don't you first ask women about this?)

Then you think sexual orientation can be designed?

Absolutely. Eventually, we will be able to engineer people to a greater preference for their own sex. (not fuck*ing likely)

It seems to me that a lot of women are far more open to homosexuality than men, or at least are more willing to experiment.

Boy oh boy oh boy, the word feminazi just pops out at you reading this shit.

This dumb ass has been watching too much star trek and relates herself to the borg queen?Sarcasm)...
She should consign herself to petting her cat or walking to the shopping mall with her chihuahua in her purse, because her intellect in reality has taken a dive.

We can clearly see the old feminist values are still around in what she spews out of her yap, population control, the destruction of the nuclear family, lesbianism, all can be found here.

As for the feminists who repeat sayings by old hags is not their way of thinking, well we see now this has been passed down and is alive and well and perfectly represents even today's feminism.

﻿

﻿

Why is it, every time feminism bring up their obvious hate of males, it eventually end up promoting lesbianism? The last time I checked, this lifestyle is not exactly a preferred choice with women.

We have shown a relation between feminism and lesbianism in recent posts, shelter with posters promoting it, video interviews where residents who went for help had to put up with sexual advance...(13 min into this video) And if you watch the whole video you will be more horrified about how the residents of women shelters are really treated. Including the post we did.

When we see males(and I use the term lightly) holding up a t-shirt or claiming "this is what a feminist looks like", you just have to shake your head and either recognize him has an intellectual retard or just some lowly mangina who suffers from an inferiority complex towards real men and wants recognition for his misgivings by siding with those who thinks he's a rapist...either way, what a poor lonely left over, treated by the feminists around him as cat excrement.

The point to all this is to expose what they (feminist and manginas) really represent, their ranks have zealots, man haters, radical lesbians, racists, corruption, greed, stupidity, idiocy, manipulation, communism, marxism and since the post above is about population control, fascism and nazism.

Definition of nazism; a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to control a specified activity, practice, etc.: So, what is the difference between all this, or am I missing something?

Anyone who claim the flag of feminism or acts like a mangina should and are now shun like the plague, they are trouble makers, low intellectual haters filled with self doubt which none of us need, we have enough problems for the moment in this screwed up world than to pander to those who have an inferiority complex or want "population control a la nazism."

It is important to expose them for what they are, otherwise they will continue on infesting our society to a point where it will no longer be viable for Mother Earth to support the human race, eventually replacing us with a more self reliant species....

We can't have 1 to 10% of the male population and not inner-breed, if this happens, the human race is f*cked...(pardon my french). The girl in the video is a product of feminism, and should the rest of the world subscribe to her bullsh*t, such a disturbing policy would weaken nations which would adopt it?

Simple?
I know, this is stupidity and will never come to pass, but just the thought that the product of a feminist education at some university spits out this kind of belief is just....a head scratching moment.