Monday, August 29, 2016

In July of 2016,researchers on the health of NASA astronauts dropped a bombshell concerning the cardiovascular mortality of the Apollo Lunar astronauts. Despite the enhanced levels of radiation exposure by astronauts at LEO and beyond LEO, there were no indications of increased levels of cancer for space faring astronauts relative to people living on Earth. The research also showed no significant increase in cardiovascular deaths (the leading cause of death for Americans) relative to people living on the Earth's surface. Surprisingly, the research did reveal that the frequency of cardiovascular deaths of Apollo Lunar astronauts was four to five times higher than in LEO astronauts and in NASA astronauts that have yet to have the opportunity to fly into space.

Although astronauts are exposed to enhanced levels of radiation beyond the Earth's magnetosphere, astronauts at LEO are completely shielded from the most lethal component of cosmic radiation, heavy nuclei (heavy ions), most of the time.

Most of the protons and alpha particles from cosmic radiation pass harmlessly though the vacuous
space between the atoms of the human body. But the relentless rain of
cosmic
radiation inevitably results in impacts upon our corporeal components. Heavy nuclei, on the other hand, have relatively-short interaction
lengths when encountering matter. Such interactions with human tissue can be significantly deleterious DNA molecules and can pose a challenge to cellular repair.
It has been estimated that during a future-- 6 month-- journey to
Mars, the nucleus of one out of every three
cells in the human body would receive at least one hit from a cell
damaging heavy ion. With the inability of neurons to repair themselves, it has been predicted that a mere six months of heavy nuclei exposure could potentially destroy a third of the total neurons in the central nervous system.

Approximately, 15 to 20 g/cm2 of mass is required to effectively stop the penetration of heavy ions. However, its estimated that Astronauts aboard the Apollo Command Module (CM), were only provided with about 10 g/cm2 of radiation shielding. And some parts of the Command Module were more heavy shielded than
other areas of the CM. The window areas were particularly thinly
shielded which would have allowed heavy nuclei to easily penetrate into
the CM interacting with the body tissues of the astronauts.

Astronauts
on there way to and from the Moon experience retinal flashes aboard the
CM when they were outside of the Earth's magnetosphere. And NASA
believes that this was the result of heavy nuclei traversing the human
retina. Retinal flashes occurred at an average frequency of every 2.9
minutes which sometimes made sleeping a challenge for the astronauts. At
least 90% of the Apollo astronaut's exposure to heavy nuclei
bombardment occurred during their voyage to and from the lunar surface
and not on the lunar surface itself.

But there was even less shielding against heavy nuclei for
astronauts when the were aboard the Lunar Module (LM) and when they were
on the surface of the Moon. However, half of the heavy nuclei would have been blocked by the mass of the Moon when astronauts were on the lunar surface.

Since the cardiovascular health of Apollo Lunar astronauts relative to humans on Earth has now been shown to be significantly effected after less than two weeks beyond the Earth's magnetosphere, its now clear that astronauts in the future will have to be adequately protected from heavy nuclei when traveling beyond the magnetosphere to the Earth-Moon Lagrange points, the lunar surface and on interplanetary journeys to Mars.

Since there is virtually no atmosphere on the surface of the Moon, lunar astronauts
venturing outside of their regolith shielded habitats would be exposed to the relentless
penetration of heavy nuclei. Lunar astronauts would, therefore, have to wear
pressure suits with enhanced shielding (~ 20 g/cm3). Helmets could
easily be shielded with iron 2.6 cm2 thick. But the helmet visor for lunar
excursions would probably have to be composed of lead iron glass nearly 5
centimeters thick. Thickening the rest of the lunar pressure suit with
2.6 centimeters of iron shouldn't be too difficult. The increased
weight of the iron shielded pressure suit should be easily mitigated by the Moon's 1/6
gravity. On the surface of Mars, the thin carbon dioxide atmosphere is still thick enough (~ 15 g/cm2) to shield astronauts on the surface from any direct interaction from most heavy nuclei. So enhanced shielding of pressure suits on the surface of Mars will probably not be required.

Notional reusable EUS with an internally water shielded Cygnus habitat module rendezvousing with an EUS derived propellant producing water depot at LEO

Since traveling from LEO to other important regions within cis-lunar space can take several days, its pretty obvious that crewed spacecraft traveling within cis-lunar space will have to be appropriately shielded against heavy nuclei. However, substantially increasing the shielding requirements of the Orion spacecraft to protect against heavy ions could make it to heavy for the ATV derived Service Module (SM) to push the Orion capsule on a trajectory return to Earth.

However, if the ATV derived SM is replaced with a reusable EUS that uses IVF technology and orbiting water/propellant depots, then the Orion capsule could be coupled with an appropriately water shielded Cygnus habitat. The water shielded (20 cm thick) area within the Cygnus habitat could be dumped just before the final trajectory burns into the desired cis-lunar destinations. Water could be replenished for the Cygnus habitat for return trips at the water/propellant depots.

In the long run, however, it would be even more fuel efficient if an Extraterrestrial Landing Vehicle (ETLV) were also used as an orbital transfer vehicle between LEO and the Lagrange points. Again, 20 centimeters of water shielding could be provided with an designated area of the ETLV and then dumped before the final trajectory burns to the Lagrange points, Low Lunar Orbit, or to LEO. While water shielding the ETLV crew transport area before its departure from the lunar surface would require more propellant at take off, there should be no shortages of lunar derived oxygen and hydrogen propellant on the lunar surface.

And ETLV using a ADEPT or HIAD deceleration shield could dump its water shielding just before entering Mars orbit or descending from from Mars orbit to the surface of Mars. Returning to Mars orbit, an ETLV could dock with a Mars orbiting water/propellant depot at Low Mars Orbit to add water shielding and propellant to the vehicle in order for it to return its astronauts to an interplanetary spacecraft parked in High Mars orbit.

Notional reusable ETLV returning from the martian surface rendezvousing with an EUS derived propellant producing
water depot at Low Mars Orbit before returning to High Mars Orbit.

Protecting astronauts from the deleterious effects of heavy ion bombardment beyond the Earth's magnetosphere will increase mass shielding and propellant requirements for crewed spacecraft. But the utilization of extraterrestrial water and regolith resources should make it easy and affordable to protect the health of astronauts from the dangers of heavy nuclie in the New Frontier. Links and References

"The knowledge that we have now is but a fraction of the knowledge we must get, whether for peaceful use or for national defense. We must depend on intensive research to acquire the further knowledge we need ... These are truths that every scientist knows. They are truths that the American people need to understand." (Harry S. Truman 1948).