08 November 2012 9:43 PM

America goes into the darkness

The greatest satisfaction over the re-election of
Obama is not being felt in the Democratic Party. It is not being felt among the
media, who are no longer objective observers but have turned instead into corrupt
partisans who ruthlessly censored the truth about Obama and helped peddle his
demonising propaganda about his opponent. It is not being felt among the gloating,
drooling decadents of the western left who now scent a great blood-letting of
all who dare defy their secular inquisition. No, the greatest satisfaction is surely
being felt in Iran.

With four more years of Obama in the White House, Iran can
now be sure that it will be able to complete its infernal construction of a
genocide bomb to use against the Jews and the west. World War Three has now
come a lot closer.

It is said that, with likely gridlock in Congress over
domestic issues, Obama will concentrate on foreign policy. We should all shudder.
So far, Obama has empowered Iran to destabilise the region; supported Islamist
takeovers in Egypt and Libya; is backing al Qaeda affiliates in Syria; refused
to come to the aid of Americans being attacked by al Qaeda in Benghazi as a result
of which four American officials were murdered; and hung Israel out to dry
against its genocidal Palestinian attackers.

A report
last month that Obama was secretly negotiating with the Iranian regime took
on an even more incendiary aspect a few days ago with a claim
that these negotiations were being led by his close friend and adviser, Valerie
Jarrett.

If Jarrett was indeed involved, that should strike a deep
chill into anyone who has not joined the lemming-like leap over the edge of the
western cliff. For Iranian-born Jarrett – who Obama has admitted he consults
before he takes any decision and who has been said
to act as his ‘spine’ -- is a far-leftist with roots deep in the corrupt Chicago
Democratic machine. Indeed, Jarrett has been credited
with originally smoothing Obama’s entry into Chicago’s political elite, and is
now said to be – despite her controversial background -- the
most influential person in his circle.

There have also been claims
that she advised Obama against killing Osama bin Laden, which although
unsubstantiated are all too credible. If this wholly ill-equipped and sinister
individual really has been leading secret negotiations with Iran – raising the
fear that far from preventing Iranian nuclear terrorism Obama intends to allow the
regime a face saving compromise under cover of which it will finish building
its nuclear weapon – then Obama’s perfidy against the west really is as bad as
some of us feared from the start.

Four years ago, America put into the White House a sulky
narcissist with close links to people with a history of thuggish, far-left,
black power, Jew-bashing, west-hating politics. In his autobiography, Obama himself described his mentor, the communist agitator Frank Marshall Davis, as being a promoter of black power; in 1995 Obama went on the Million Man March organised by the black power activist and radical antisemite Louis Farrakhan; for twenty years, Obama belonged to a church whose pastor, Jeremiah Wright, peddled antisemitic conspiracy theories, denounced black assimilation into white society and in June 2009 claimed that Jews were controlling Obama and were preventing Wright from talking to him.

Obama’s agenda has been crystal
clear from the get-go: to increase the power of the state over the citizen at
home, and to neutralise American power abroad. Four more years of this and he’ll
almost certainly have succeeded. The impact
upon western security could be cataclysmic.

Britain and the Europeans love Obama because they think he
will end American exceptionalism and turn the US into a pale shadow of themselves.
What they don’t realise is that, all but lobotomised by consumerist rights, state
dependency, victim culture, sentimentality, post-religion, post-nationalism and
post-Holocaust and Empire guilt, Britain and Europe are themselves fast going
down the civilisational tubes.

Romney lost because he refused to provide an alternative to
any of this for fear of being labelled a warmonger, flint-heart or social
reactionary. He refused to engage with any of the issues that made this Presidential
election so truly momentous. Up against the bullying of the totalitarian left,
he ran for cover. He played safe, and as a result only advertised his own weakness
and dishonesty. Well, voters can smell inconsistency from a mile away; they
call it untrustworthiness, and they are right.

Romney lost because, like Britain’s Conservative Party, the
Republicans just don’t understand that America and the west are being consumed
by a culture war. In their cowardice and moral confusion, they all ttempt to
appease the enemies within. And from without, the Islamic enemies of
civilisation stand poised to occupy the void.

With the re-election of Obama, America now threatens to lead
the west into a terrifying darkness.

Share this article:

Comments

You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Some further minor points:

1. "... the gloating, drooling decadents of the western left who now scent a great blood-letting of all who dare defy their secular inquisition." Even when intended figuratively, this kind of flailing invites ridicule.

2. "Iran can now be sure that it will be able to complete its infernal construction of a genocide bomb to use against the Jews..." It is always advisable to make a realistic assessment of the threat facing you. Netanyahu and Barak may believe their propaganda. The Israeli security establishment does not, nor does the American - and both consider Iran an enemy. If you believe it, why?

3. "...genocidal Palestinian attackers." Could you clarify: by genocide, do you mean killing all Jewish Israelis in Israel/Palestine or do you mean rejecting the establishment in Israel/Palestine of a Zionist "Jewish" state (with satellite ghettoes for Palestinians)?

4. "...consumerist rights, state dependency, victim culture, sentimentality, post-religion, post-nationalism and post-Holocaust and Empire guilt..." If anyone is tempted to think there is a coherent critique behind these buzzwords, I recommend a perusal of the author's book "The World Turned Upside Down" (but only if your local library has already purchased a copy).

Obama won, you say, by pandering to the (apparently left-wing) prejudices of the electorate. Romney lost, you say, for lacking the courage to stand up and condemn those prejudices. Perhaps a moment to reflect is indicated.

The Republicans lost because they stacked the deck, with the active cooperation of the mainstream media, against the one candidate who has the ideas which resonate with the independent voters amongst the American people, and anti-war Democrats], and who would have given Obama a serious run for his money, despite his less than brilliant oratorical skills. I'm talking of course about Ron Paul.

You may not like it, but a growing percentage of Americans are growing tired of policing the world, growing tired of their "ally" Israel, who refuses to engage in any meaningful peace process with the Palestinians, but instead continues to build settlements in the Occupied Territories and evict Palestinian families, who runs spy rings inside the United States, while to date, the United States has provided Israel $115 billion in bilateral assistance.

They are growing tired of their currency being debased by the cartel of private banking interests which make up the Federal Reserve, which is as federal as Federal Express, and tired of endless largesse & pork barrel politics designed to benefit special interests and lobbyists.

Ron Paul promised to change all that, which is why he was frozen out of the debates, and denied the chance to compete for the nomination at Tampa. As a result, the GOP picked a charlatan, who literally oozed insincerity from every pore; and if there is one thing Americans are good at, its spotting a phoney.

America didn't so much re-elect Obama, as vote for anyone BUT Romney. America is tired of the meaningless foreign wars she has been engaged in for ten years, in countries which have no US national interest, and where there is no end in sight. As for your horror over Obama attempting negotiations with the Iranian regime, every nation negotiates with its enemies, in the hope of achieving peace and averting war. Except it seems Israel, who seem to prefer war, war to jaw, jaw. A war with Iran risks not only becoming regional, but indeed global, and for that reason alone, the rejection of Mitt Romney, who would likely have been fuelling up the planes for an attack already, was the correct choice for America. This after all, was an American election, based on American interests, not Israeli, despite what AIPAC might have desired.

Melanie, how can you imagine that Romney and the Repulicans would take a tough stance over Iran. They're Christians! They would turn the other cheek against any aggressor. They stand for free love and tolerance.

What a ridiculous, "We're doomed" load of puffery. Melanie, are you aware that your hands are typing this nonsense up as it gurgles to the surface in your brain? Take the tin foil hat off and go outside for a bit.

Check my link, 'First Things First: Obama slaps Iran with new sanctions'. Are you going to eat your words now? You know the truth is Obama in his policies is to the right of Bush. Bush just kidnapped people Obama has them murdered.

As for Iran, it would be crazy if it wasn't trying to get nuclear weapons and good luck to them it is the only way they can escape from the economic and military terrorism inflicted upon them by the U.S and Israel.

If you really want a nuclear weapon free middle east then i suggest getting israel to get rid of its nuclear weapons considering Israel has the worst record of any country in that region for attacking its neighbours, does not sign up to the non proliferation treaty and has the means to deliver these weapons.

Do you ever actually research things before you write them Melanie? Your rant is incoherent and factually incorrect.

Now who remembers Merry Mel's dark Spectator prophecy of 4 years ago: 'America what have you done?' Who remembers its sinister, evasive insinuation that Obama was covertly installing a secret grassroots activist organisation, subverting American democracy and perpetuating his rule by a cunning combination of thinly-disguised threat and propaganda.....? All of that is conveniently erased now, to be replaced by Mel's standard Cassandra-register hysterobabble, where no coherent political argument can emerge from the costive, overblown pile-up of prose -- and where the even the possibility of counterfactual evidence is pre-emptively stifled. Pray, Mel -- if the prediction of 4 years ago fell through so dismally, why should be take this latest bout of crisis rhetoric remotely seriously?

A pre emptive attack on Iran by the US and Israel would have been a distinct possibility under Romney. This could have led to World war III. With Obama at the helm, this scenario becomes improbable. Iran's Arab neighbours are very concerned about the nuclear threat posed: They should be brought into the equation to force Iran into complying with IAE inspections and requirements. If Iran does not play ball, the Arab world should have its part to play in any resolution of the crisis. A pre emptive strike by the US and Israel will create a far more uncertain outcome in the powder keg that is the Middle East. World War III is then a more likely outcome. Unfortunately, that is precisely what the extremists on both sides are seeking: The mother of all battles to decide the conflict once and for all. Let us hope that Armageddon is a warning rather than a prophecy, and that reason and good will can prevail over the forces of war and destruction

Wow Melanie, yours is by far the best assesment/review of the US President I have seen. Jarrett is the most dangerous woman, in my opinion, in the world. There is no doubt in my mind that she is the controlling force in the White House.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the moderator has approved them. They must not exceed 500 words. Web links cannot be accepted, and may mean your whole comment is not published.