Hi there, I'm 6'1" white male Xtrabeing, welcome to the Fleshpots. Please don't be offended, but I like myself rather a lot. When stranger-girls shout out they want to have your baby to you, it tends to affect the ole ego a tad. 400 xwatchers come here daily and you're 1.

Pussyass, system-manipulating liberals

have been riding high on the backs of bitches’ votes ever since the disastrous women’s-voting “right” changes occurred. Election after election, in every country with democracy, if the tampon queens didn’t vote for smiley-weak white liberal men, the soft-eyed boys would never get elected themselves. So you think they’d be grateful to their female patron-ettes? Actually, no. Liberals dislike bitches as much as anyone else. Who do you think gets bossed around the most by their wives? By design, because of liberal pandering to the clitectorate, this is what the future’s going to look like for everyone else — even for those rare men like me who control the twats by their side. Because no one can fight an entire cogs-and-gears-whirling society, and its — our — culture will be feminazified completely. Oh, and by the way: once that happens, there’s no going back, in case you thought there was a possibility of that. The patriarchy was a steady state with a slim chance of degeneration into matriarchy (as realized now by liberals). The matriarchy has no exit point. Boss wives for everyone!! And their tastes and preferences everywhere!

Even the liberals seem to belatedly realize this, and are trying to pull back vainly on the reins of this wild, downward-sloping horse they have set in motion. There was much head-scratching over the reality that liberal TV producers and reporters gave $3 billion of free advertising to anti-feminist Trump, as if they couldn’t have blocked him out if they truly wanted to. (Let’s just say that they’ve learned the lessons of history.) If Trump really was another powerful right-winger like Hitler, with such demagogic sway, the TV boys would’ve never have let him on the air. They would’ve froze him out. It makes one curious, then, why they gifted him with so much free exposure which hastened his electoral win. Curious, indeed.

But the answer isn’t too far to seek. Bitches have gotten too much power in society, on top of their at-home power. This has begun throttling even the white male liberals in every aspect of their lives, professional and personal, that touches on the menstruating twats themselves.

Because cunts torture baby boys and exploit this later on, they rule at the interpersonal level of society absolutely, man-and-woman, and even most normal-size social groups. They don’t care if a “Thing” (a man) “takes the lead” and does all the hard work of directing a mixed group to go here or there, as long as all important casual decisions that matter to them remain in cunt hands. But it has gotten far worse than that: now you have to have 50% representation: women in board rooms, women as CEOs, women as professors, women as senators and Members of Parliament, women as rich people, women as everything. The combination of their infiltration into the Systems of Society, which were all designed by abstract-thinking men for the benefit of men, with the bitches’ informal control levels means that they rule absolutely, except for tiny pockets of inconsequential male resistance.

So the white male TV producers thought they’d had enough. They focused the camera on Trump, not because D.T. was a great showman, but because he controlled his bitch Melania pretty good, and they thought maybe emplacing that symbol-icon in the highest spot in the land would help roll back all those scampering Cunts coming to steal what wasn’t rightly theirs.

Also, they didn’t want to look at and televise a repulsive pantsuited old hag for 8 years, a hell all men would want to avoid. But trying to roll back the bitches a decent amount seemed to be their priority.

Regrettably, they will fail. The unholy male LiberalMale-cunt alliance that began in England in the 1800s has only gained steam and cannot be reversed by normal, mild means. The pleasant past is a strange land to postmodernites. It used to be a man got all his bitch’s family money after his wedding — and why not, he owned her, therefore “her” stuff; but by the 1800’s, suddenly this reversed and she could walk away with his stuff. This is the perfect symbol of an unattractively-decadent (as opposed to utopianistically and nicely decadent) society that lets loose its hand in weakness and supplication.

The end result of all this is that, for the first time in history, thanks to technology and Systems, females are going to gain a permanent edge in Society, which they will see no reason to relinquish. Everything is trending in that direction. As soon as the birth control gift was given to them, as soon as laws changed to accommodate them, while at the same time every new generation of baby boys continued to be ruthlessly tortured into future conditioning behavior, all the dominoes were lined up to fall in the year 2100 or 2200 into a matriarchy paradise for women. A likely One World government would be able to use men to suppress the “backward” Third World until they too are pacified with video games and delicious food and alcohol and women take over there also.

What will the future look like if this process continues unimpeded (and it will, unless a Giant of a Male steps forward)? Expect first to see squalling babies in all workplaces. And I do mean all. At first, there’ll be soundproof barriers between the on-site daycare centers mommies will happily visit, but then the mothers “working” at their desks will want to hear the individual cries of their infants so they can go attend to them on the fly and hapless male workers will have to hear — suffer through — that all day long. Men already prop up token women in the workplaces, such as when a “woman CEO” relies on men-advisers to make all her decisions for her, or a male manager figures out around-the-corner hard problems women can’t solve. Women will exult and cheer, men will scream out. Do you think women will care? Women only care about what’s normal to them, and whether or not they’ll be punished. If there’s no threat to them, they’ll smear their menstrual social blood over anything, everything and all in-between. Let me repeat this: they don’t care. If you want an example, why does no woman ever give a man a sympathy orgasm? A handjob, something? Not even once? Guaranteed, lots of guys would do this for women, without even expecting to cum themselves. That’s just a simple-point example. We think this is normal behavior, for bitches to be totally selfish, and men to be giving, and then we call the cunts the “nurturing sex.” They’re blabbermouth manipulators is what they are, nothing else. Oh, so society . . . and it’s hell-in-a-handbasket . . . Relationships of a dating or marriage nature will be tinkered with progressively. Women want to choose aggressive men but even more want those “catches” turned into homebound dogs; all social functions will be turned to enhance the probability of that happening. That means that men will be socialized by schools, work, and TV to conform to an image women set. Because all the levers of society will be in their hands, they’ll have no problem doing this. Mass entertainment, such as books, currently dominated by female readers, will consistently spew mindpoison into the social environment; currently movies have one token female character for marketing reasons and three main male heroes; this will be reversed. Why not? Once the insinuation is made that 50/50 is mandatory, why stop there? Shouldn’t some areas be more female? Isn’t everything pro-female right and good? Remember that men have been tortured as baby boys. Most men are only protected by a few defensive angry emotions that cannot reliably be called upon, and by the Systems they generate in a mass society. The now-infiltrated Systems will no longer serve to protect them and their interests. There are always male familiars (sworn servants of the sisterhood) who use female leverage to gain power in society, and those male familiars — on a more creative level — will sketch out new ideas women can’t come up with for themselves to enslave the mass of men to the cunt vibe.

If you doubt women want this, or doubt it’s possible, think on this: Look how far women have come in a mere 65 years. The world of the 1950s, pre-Flower Power, was vastly more favorable for men and more normal, as versus now. There is an intertia in social affairs, and things keep getting worse and worse for men, from divorce theft to grrl-power propaganda everywhere you turn (not to mention that every giant blow-up photo in public seems to show a Twat doing something). As for what women want, they really do believe men are “Things” to be used and manipulated. Females are sick of lying and dissimulating to men. They just want to declare their true feelings, all the time, for these “Things” to obey, be good dogs, in their hearts. Down boy, down! Well now they have the means, thanks to these White Male Liberals, starting in England, who laid the road for them to travel on. Enjoy the future, Manginas and Male Bitches. You bought and paid for it.

Interesting theory. But more likely, female TV producers failed to realize that endless bitching about DT = endless publicity, and any publicity is good publicity.

Another way of looking at it is that endless bitching by the MSM is akin to a stranger going up to the same person every day and punchin’ em right in the kisser, unprovoked and unprompted… day after day. But that person, though he didn’t start it, never fails to get back up and give back as good as he gets.

An onlooker seeing this everyday may well get the impression the punchman is deranged. Or at least become desensitized to the whole matter.

Blah. V, you usually write with great clarity and directness, and yet here you don’t. Reread what you wrote with the eye of a stranger, then look at most anything else (good) which you’ve produced. This is not just plain wrong, but hard to read. I have a theory: whenever someone blurs the meaning of his normally-smooth communication, he’s either trying to shit himself or someone else; sometimes both.

You’re shitting me. Wake up and see the realities I’m presenting for you.

(OTOH I do like vigorous debating, so feel free to box back with uppercuts and jabs if you wish. I’m no fragile pussy like the cunts I’m criticizing. But don’t expect a free pass if I think you’re wrong.) — X.

P.S. I will always remember your sly dig at my for attempting to flatter you. There is no contradiction between a little encouraging ass-kissing and some slamming like I’m doing. I’m showing I want you, I value you, but I won’t tolerate bullshit from myself, you, or anyone else around me. Both the flattery and the intellectual criticism are positive hallmarks of a good relationship and should be normal aspects of any superior society. X.

But I contest that the last US election was the willful doing of male TV producers. (There are plenty of female producers.) More likely, male TV producers exhibit that common disconnect men in power have between their professed feminist beliefs and sexist behavior. They may have got along great with Trump when he was one of them, but now that he’s one of them…