May 31, 2010

In her June 2010 article updating the status of Sears Island after a year under the Conservation Easement : Signs of stewardship on Sears Island, the usually thorough Catherine Schmitt steers cautiously, assiduously avoiding the "P" word (Port) that, like barely hidden ledge, would tear a hole in the entire song and dance of those featured in her story, the FOPSIs "Friends of Parts of Sears Island" into an "and the band played on" Titanic scenario. And that wouldn't do. Instead, while the island's lushly wet western forests and saltmarshes are at increased risk of being destroyed, of vanishing beneath waves of concrete, steel and asphalt as an industrial port materializes, the tale of FOPSI is one of tranquil mending of paths and byways of their "protected portion" of Sears Island, oblivious to the din, the shudder and roar of industry - scant yards from their piece of truncated paradise! One thinks of an Island Institute editor grimly trimming away all of Schmitt's sentences describing dissent with the plan, litigation and otherwise, that gives a pair of ENGOs control over 600 acres of the 900+ acre island. At least one HOPES such an editor had at her story. For, what of those opponents of dividing the island? What of the three civil actions currently in Maine Superior Court, contesting the validity of the state's easement deal with Maine Coast Heritage Trust granting a private company a perpetual easement governing two thirds of Sears Island? What about the 1000s of Mainers and others who've made their opposition to island-splitting deals clear, decade after decade? Schmidt dismisses (there is no other word) these concerned multitudes (who reside on all parts of the Maine political spectrum) thus:

"Others, however, are a bit upset about the changes."

Who are these upset ones? Dissent having been relegated to being only a "bit",however, there's no need, Schmitt evidently thinks, to cudgel the poor readers' brains with any details on those people. Beyond that shredding of the article, one is troubled that Schmitt not probe a bit more deeply. She writes:

Because the Trust only holds the easement, and does not own the land outright, they don’t take an active management role, said McMullin. Evidently regarding that as the final word, Schmitt doesn't trouble to consult the aforementioned easement, which gives Maine Coast Heritage Trust, as "the Holder" myriad decisionmaking powers over land use up to the power to bar people from the island entirely. After describing the trail maintenance measures undertaken on the eastern portion of Searse Island, by FOPSI, comes this gem:The Friends have access to the western side of the island, most of which is retained by DOT, said Marietta, “but we’re not anxious to put too much time into that area.” And whydoes anxiety lurk in that area, pray tell? The reader is left to imagine for herself the terrors lurking in those swampy forests covering western Sears Island. For Schmitt doesn't. Is it those brooks lacing their way down to Searsport Harbor, the ones that would be filled, cemented over - are they the source of the FOPSI-ites' anxiety? We are left hanging. That's it. that's the lock, stock and barrel of Schmitt's article's mention of the ongoing dissent over the future of Wassumkeag. All I can say is... A pox on those editors and their cutting room floors! Their cuts and their pastes! One has always expected this in the Herald Gazette and other general news pubs; it aches to find the same smoke cloudery by the Island Institute's editors.

May 24, 2010

Attorney gaming today: The deepwater wind R&D test site-enabling agency called Bureau of Parks and Lands recently gave me 100s of pages of records on how they chose the Monhegan test area. Then suddenly it occurred to me the deadline for responding to it loomed. 6 hrs left!

Babble Stations!the klaxon roared. To the word processor I hastened. But even heavy doses of Morning Thunder failed to cause the whole jumble to coalesce. What does it all mean? I groaned, twitching with mate' overdose, turning draft motions-to-extend into paper airplanes and flinging them at my window fan.

Then the phone rings: it's a mystic I've enlisted in the effort to convince the windgods to keep blowing the BP spill west and north. Away from the Loop and away from everything east of Florida's outer panhandle. Progress is encouraging; the plume of oil that was moving to the SE towards the Loop Current is being shoved west away from Florida and Cuba and toward the center of the Gulf of Mexico. Back, maybe, toward the home leak. That's it, slime-o, go home, mama's calling... \

With that under control for the moment, it's back to the other GOM - the Gulf of Maine. Suing on behalf of Beauty and the Beasts against that Mordor-in-sheep's-clothing we call nearshore wind extraction industry. First, I call the lawyers:

Me: Time keeps on slippin', slippin,,into the futurrrrre...Gimme 3 more weeks to strain the Official Record through my synapses. And I want a digital data dump. You down with that, law-persons?
Atty 1 (State AAG) Cool. How about we arrange for you to pump BPL and SPO's Coastal Program's techies for those digital details you want?
Me: Okay, I'll drop those digital data details from the Motion; judge don't need'em. Next?
Atty 1. Summarized: You get your three week extension to peruse the official record then you can order the details from the BPL and SPO.
Me: (verbal fist bump with Atty 1) Then I ask: "U-Maine-ster?"
Atty 2 (UMaine's) Good to go if Atty 1 is. Yes? Then send us copies and, while you're at it, will you please think about cutting a deal before the case goes too much farther?Me: Um...I'll be in touch. Later! (Deal? An idea starts to form....)

May 20, 2010

The Gulf of Maine Research Institute says it plans to do some gene hacking in order to:

"...enable and promote innovation in marine diversification in the Gulf of Maine."

See part 2 of their advertisement below. But beyond the rather obvious fact that marine gene splicing should be done well away from the ocean - say the midwest or the desert regions - the last time this was tried in Maine it too was just a storm drain away from the Gulf of Maine. That time, the plan was to hack the genes of seaweeds, adding a toxin to the algae that would inhibit "bio-fouling" on farmed algae. Biofouling is the accumulation of marine organisms onto receptive surfaces under water. A boat hull covered with barnacles has been biofouled.

The problem with adding that anti biofouling gene to a living algae is that when (not IF) it escapes, it may outcompete the natural seaweeds that don't exude poison and that do nurture wild marine nature.

Replacing seaweeds that nurture with seaweeds that KILL would play havoc with the oceanic ecosystem.

But with the hubris of money and backed by a potent public relations effort, the GOMRI-ites will tell you that they will never never ever spill any of their mutants into the ocean that is only a few feet from their lab. Read their advert below.

2) GMRI is developing a program to enable and promote innovation in marine diversification in the Gulf of Maine. The initial phase of this project will be a comprehensive analysis of innovative uses of marine resources from around the world in an effort to identify key opportunities of the Gulf of Maine. The intern will assist the Director of Community Initiatives by collecting and analyzing data on marine innovation and its applicability to our region. The programs goal is to facilitate the development of new niche marine markets in renewable energy, bio-environmental monitoring, water management, marine biotech/pharma and functional foods.

May 18, 2010

We've just received the "Administrative Record" that Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands was required to supply me and Maine Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Hjelm. Please help me understand them! The 327+ pages are supposed to contain all the info the BPL used to make its December 14, 2009 decision to site UMaine's deepwater wind test site off Monhegan Island, instead of any of three sites further downeast.. These "records" will be used by Judge Jeffrey Hjelm to decide if the Bureau of Parks and Lands' decision was lawful or not in Huber v Bureau of Parks and Lands

May 17, 2010

Huber v Bureau of Parks and Lands. Below are links to 4 of the ten sections of the Record that contains all the information that the Bureau used to decide that waters off Monhegan were suitable Monhegan Deepwater Wind R&D site lawsuit.

May 4, 2010

Operation Sargasso Sorrow. The surface currents that would transport the BP oil spill north of the Gulf of Mexico, can be diverted into an eastern heading, sending them straight east into the western core of the Sargasso Sea gyre.

UPDATE: BP HOrizon Cleanup HQ sends email declining to try current diversion:--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Horizon Support<Horizonsupport@oegllc.com>
Date: Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:43 PM
Subject: Horizon Call Center - Your Recent Submission
To: coastwatch@gmail.com
Dear Ron Huberr,
Thank you so much for taking the time to think about and submit your proposed solution regarding the Horizon incident. Your submission has been reviewed for its technical merits. Unfortunately, the team has determined that your idea cannot be applied under the very challenging and specific operating conditions we face. All of us on the Horizon Support Team appreciate your thoughts and efforts.
Sincerely yours,Horizon Support Team

But...the oil will tend to be contained within the gyre; there, remediation can be concentrated on a single shoreless location, rather than along the coasts of the Atlantic eastern seaboard.

HOW WHAT WHERE WHY: Deploy large numbers of upwelling devices (pumps, floating windmills,etc to pull up giant cold water plumes from the bottom to the surface, offshore from the southern tip of Everglades National Park to west of the Dry TortugasNtional Marine Sanctuary as could be done., setting up a cold water barriers - like giant oil boom 100 feet to keep the oil offshore. T See: Göran Broström, Norwegian Meteorological Institute's paper "On the influence of large wind farms on the upper ocean circulation" Navies should also tow as many large and medium icebergs south to join the line of spill diversion, Plenty of loose chunks floating about, east of Newfoundland

Enough deployed, the "thermal water walls": cold, dense and maintained there by the churning upwelling action of every pump that every navy and merchant vessel of the world can deploy there, every floating ocean wind turbine (dern! there's only one!) that can be towed there, will divert the less dense oiled waters out and eastward to the Sargasso Gyre. This could be genocidal toward American Eels, given their dependence on the Sargasso for reproductive purposes. Europe would likely get a short micro-ice age from the temporary diversion of the Gulf Stream east into the Sargasso Sea gyre instead of north into the NW & NE Atlantic. Sometimes there are no good choices, only bad ones versus terrible ones.