Comments on: Indiana Supreme Court Says State Overreached in Dog Seizurehttp://naiaonline.org/blog/animal-policy/indiana-supreme-court-says-state-overreached-in-dog-seizure/
For the welfare of animals, to safeguard the rights of responsible animal owners.Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:01:00 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.4By: MisterCadethttp://naiaonline.org/blog/animal-policy/indiana-supreme-court-says-state-overreached-in-dog-seizure/#comment-30
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:13:00 +0000http://naiaonline.org/blog/?p=189#comment-30According to page 59 of HSUS’s 2009 tax returns, a $2,000 grant was given by HSUS to the Office of the Attorney General of Indiana to support the investigation of Indiana puppy mills and placement of puppies…
]]>By: fightacorruptsystemhttp://naiaonline.org/blog/animal-policy/indiana-supreme-court-says-state-overreached-in-dog-seizure/#comment-29
Thu, 24 May 2012 08:40:00 +0000http://naiaonline.org/blog/?p=189#comment-29 Pro Bono!! The person behind this is the harrison county animal control officer. He currently is being sued by a no kill cat shelter because he raided her too.
]]>By: Alicehttp://naiaonline.org/blog/animal-policy/indiana-supreme-court-says-state-overreached-in-dog-seizure/#comment-28
Sat, 19 May 2012 16:42:00 +0000http://naiaonline.org/blog/?p=189#comment-28And these people obviously – and thankfully – had the funds available to get good lawyers to pursue this action – where as most “little” guys – I don’t believe would have been able to do anything financially to pursue this . Thank Goodness they did – now a pecedent is set.
]]>By: Dobegalhttp://naiaonline.org/blog/animal-policy/indiana-supreme-court-says-state-overreached-in-dog-seizure/#comment-27
Sat, 19 May 2012 15:48:00 +0000http://naiaonline.org/blog/?p=189#comment-27Just let me correct one thing the Indiana State Police didn’t take the dogs, they were only there to assist another state agency, Department of revenue. After going onto the property and seeing what was happening the officers moved to the end of the driveway and wanted nothing to do with the case. Because they were there they get named in the suit. I don’t want anyone to think that the ISP was the strong arm of HSUS here!!!!
]]>By: Laurelhttp://naiaonline.org/blog/animal-policy/indiana-supreme-court-says-state-overreached-in-dog-seizure/#comment-26
Fri, 18 May 2012 04:29:00 +0000http://naiaonline.org/blog/?p=189#comment-26OMG, if either entity isnt illegal and horrible, liars by themself, now they are working as a team, help us all!
]]>