State intervention is back

Industrial strategy needs more than just innovation

Britain has an industrial strategy. State intervention is back. Incentivising R&D and skills training have always been accepted as part of the government’s remit. On the other hand, government support of specific sectors—typified by Labour’s failed industrial strategies of the 1970s—has fallen out of favour.

However, if we are to hold the state accountable for its failures, we should also recognise its successes. For example, without substantial government support, it is highly unlikely that successful UK industries, such as pharmaceuticals, would have grown to their current scale.

Last year’s creation of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy is an open acknowledgement that the state not only has a role to play in monitoring and co-ordinating economic activity but indeed has a responsibility to do so.

Perhaps the biggest departure from industrial strategies of the recent past is the government’s continued emphasis on “inclusive” growth. The government’s Industrial Strategy white paper, released in November, cited the notion of “place” as one of the five foundations of productivity growth and also stressed the importance of addressing the challenges of Britain’s ageing society in its “Four Grand Challenges.” Indeed, there is an implicit acknowledgement throughout the document that an industrial strategy can only succeed if it is developed in tandem with wider government policy.

However, just as previous industrial strategies have made the mistake of “picking winners,” are we in danger of falling victim to “innovation blinkers”? In effect, is the white paper’s focus on innovative sectors made at the expense of the wider economy? While innovation has the potential to deliver tremendous economic growth, it is impossible to bridge the gap between R&D and production without a strong manufacturing base and skilled workforce. Also, a lack of access to international markets, whether due to international regulation or lack of trade agreements, runs the risk of placing the UK in an economic chokehold where productivity is increased but barriers to exporting remain insurmountable.

Britain’s upcoming exit from the European Union has created a new urgency around policies to help homegrown industries compete on the global stage. Despite the ongoing negotiations and the current lack of clarity over our future relationship with our largest trading partner, the recently-unveiled white paper nevertheless remains a welcome and necessary first step towards determining the future of British industry.

Brexit Britain: the future of industry is a publication which examines the future of UK manufacturing through the prism of the recently released Industrial Strategy White Paper. The report features contributions from the likes of Greg Clark MP, Miriam Gonzalez, Richard Graham MP and Frances O’Grady.

If you want to know all about where industry is headed in Brexit Britain, you can download the whole Brexit Britain: The future of industry reportas a fully designed PDF document. To do so, simply enter your email below. You’ll receive your copy completely free—within minutes.

Email:

First name:

Last Name:

When you sign up for this free report, you will also join our free Prospect newsletter.

Prospect takes your privacy seriously. We promise never to rent or sell your e-mail address to any third party. You can unsubscribe from the Prospect newsletter at any time.

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

Timothy Garton Ash says Britain could pull back from the Brexit brink and lead EU reform from within. David Allen Green says that if we must leave, there is a better way to do it. Plus: a new exhibition punctures the clichés around Islamic art

Sponsored features

Prospect was originally founded by Editor David Goodhart and Publisher Derek Coombs, as a home for intelligent debate. The magazine is owned and supported by the Resolution Group, as part of its not-for-profit, public interest activities. The aim is to tackle the big challenges confronting society, through rigorous thinking and fine writing.

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days.. PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.