Hi
folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on September
the 5th 2011. For newcomers, I always suggest Ė and get it out
of the way at the start of the broadcast Ė that you should look into my web
site cuttingthroughthematrix.com
and help yourself to the hundreds of audios which are there to hopefully guide
you and give you shortcuts to the big system that youíre born into. Itís
really an amazing system indeed. Itís very much like The Matrix
where the room that you happen to be born into is the system made out for
you and of course it takes an awful long time, or maybe a few shocks along
the way, before you realize, no, thatís the fake system and thereís ones above
it, many layers actually. So hopefully, as I say, youíll get the
shortcuts if you go through these audios.

Remember too, you are the audience who bring me to you so you can
support me by buying the books and disks I have for sale at
cuttingthroughthematrix.com. [Order and donation options listed above.] Itís all explanatory on the .com site when
you look into it. Remember too, all those sites have a lot of transcripts
in other languages at alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
and all the rest of them listed there in English Ė I have of course English Ė
transcripts as well for those who want print-ups. So thereís lots to
choose from.

Because
itís a bewildering system when youíre on the bottom room, or the bottom floor basically,
when youíre born into it. Your parents donít know. People around
you donít know. Your educational system and the media, their job is to
make you stay in that room and never even imagine thereís anything beyond it,
just bad people at the top of your room basically, floating near the ceiling,
that seem to be awfully rich. Thatís how you kind of perceive life, in
this vague way. But itís much, much bigger than that. Itís a global
system, HAS BEEN all your life and before your parents were even born because
this system was set up a long time ago. To bring us where? Exactly
where we are today, including the schedules for wars, wars with whom, and the
whole list of wars, one after another, for this present period of time to
standardize the last few countries in the world into something called
democracy, which is a wonderful idea; if it could actually materialize we might
get some profit out of it, personally. Anyway, youíll find that it
doesnít exist at all. Itís a con. Itís a front, like everything
else is a front, to bring in a form of socialist system to control the public
with the big fascist system at the top of it. Because when you look into all
the partnerships of left-wing and right-wing at the top, theyíre either all
married to each other, or related at least, and theyíre all awfully, awfully
wealthy, incredibly wealthy. Some of the richest people in the world are
actually Marxists. Quite astonishing.

Anyway,
thatís the system that they gave us to really control us. Itís a socialist
or Marxist type system, exactly what Professor Carroll Quigley talked
about. He says, they often mistake
our groups for Marxists or left-wingers, and of course he was talking
about the Council on Foreign Relations which is just the American branch of the
Royal Institute of International Affairs, the ones who were given the initial
task and set up the international bankers Ė they owned it actually Ė and given
a royal charter to exist and go ahead.†
They basically owned the system of money and they went after the worldís
resources, initially, but they also went out to set up a world government, well
over 100 years ago, when they called themselves the Milner Group and of course
the Rhodes Society. Iíve no doubt they existed with many names prior
to that too. But as I say, theyíre often mistaken for the left-wing
because the big bankers prefer, definitely prefer a socialist type system with
a massive government and governmental agencies to control every aspect of your
lives. Back with more after this break.

Hi
folks, weíre back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. Interesting
that Quigley said that though, they were
often mistaken, this Council on Foreign Relations, for being Marxist or communist. And really, when you
look at the two of them, thereís not a whit of difference really except theyíre
run by another group above them, you see. As I say, they prefer socialism
or communism because it really has a heavy hand over the public. It makes
the proper kind of society, as they like to say themselves, where youíre
watched and supervised and given the right thoughts and the right ideas and the
right things to worship, which is generally the State, that kind of stuff.

Some
of them call it positive freedom and other ones call it negative freedom.
Negative freedom is where they give you a kind of 1970s America with lots of
movies about people going back and forward in the desert in big cars and not
much happens and things like that. So youíre well entertained but you
donít really know whatís going on and youíre kept out of any kind of loop, and
the media just fosters that too. Positive freedom comes in when you have
a common cause, a purpose, and they give purposes like we have to spread
communism across the world, or weíve got to go fight the Nazis, or fight the
Japanese, or fight somebody. Now itís fighting the Middle East of
course. And thatís positive freedom; get them all on board together, a
war scenario in other words, always with a vague down-the-road utopia that will
materialize one day and youíre working to help those who are yet to
come. Thatís the idea of it. But they use all of these techniques.

Itís
interesting too, that Karl Marx talked about basically a united Europe, and a
united Americas as well, and also one for the Pacific Rim region, which also
the Council on Foreign Relations set up back in the 1920s Ė the Institute for
Pacific Relations is one of their fronts and they have another couple of them Ė
ALL working towards one day building China up to be the manufacturer of the world.
Of course, they created the World Trade Organization to do it. And we
pumped our cash in to make it so. And then of course, the eventual
amalgamation under a singular system for the Far East as well. So theyíre
doing it and rushing ahead with NAFTA, for the Americas; theyíre still pushing
ahead with that as well. And each Prime Minister and President takes
different turns going down and signing the deals. They used to all do it
together until a lot of the ones who were watching them caught on to that.
Now they keep it quiet. They just go for Ďtoursí in Latin America and sign the
different charters and treaties.

In
Europe of course, those who have followed Europe... and this is the sad thing
about today too. Weíre not really a creature thatís built to look across
the whole world and feel part of anything way out wonder. Itís like
looking into outer space and believing you belong to Mars or something.
Youíre only involved with the things around you, which can either help or hurt
you, and thatís your immediate area. Therefore, we become kind of
localized in our thoughts and thinking. If you notice, the media gives us
nothing but foreign media now and foreign wars, to train you that itís all part
of one global system. And they get you awful frustrated about them,
except thereís nothing you can do about it, you see. It further
frustrates you; thereís nothing you can do. You know itís nothing to do
with the reasons they give you for all these wars. We know itís plunder
and everything else. And personally, I get awfully sick at the media
going along with lies, and then exposing the lies, and then going back to the
lies again. They did that with the Ďweapons of mass destructioní.
Then it leaked out it was just a phrase dreamed up by Madison Avenue, that they
were told to set up for the President and the rest of them to speak out about,
and then they exposed that, and then they were using it back the following
day. Thatís how fast they change. Itís like the head of the Council
on Foreign Relations, Mr Haass, admitting that they didnít go into the Middle
East to help anybody getting killed by their governments at all; they used that
as an excuse. But the next day in the main news it was back to the same
thing: oh, we went over there to help the poor people being killed by
their governments. Itís all farce and unfortunately they churn out a
lot of farce for us to believe in, and confuse us too.

Getting
back to that amalgamation deals too, as I say, Karl Marx talked about the
unification of Europe and thatís really what has been set up. Itís a super
Soviet type system with an awful lot of rich millionaires and billionaires
running the whole show at the top. And at the top you donít even know
whoís running it because they wonít tell you; itís secret. They still
call it democratic though because the politicians that supposedly represent the
different countries now, which are now called states or provinces, the
politicians can yap a lot and grandstand on television and laugh at each other,
etc, but they canít actually pass any bill themselves or even put any bills
forward never mind annul them. So itís a dictatorship of a sort.

Here
you have the same Marxist idea...

Former German leader calls for "United States of
Europe"

reuters.com / Brian Rohan/ Sep 4, 2011

BERLIN (Reuters) -
Former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder on Sunday called for the creation of
a "United States of Europe," (Alan: I heard this last year,
he says it every year...) saying the bloc needed a common government to
avoid future economic crises. (A: Cause the problem and come out
with the solution, this is what they do.)

Schroeder, a Social
Democrat who ran the country from 1998 to 2005, said in an interview with Der
Spiegel that European Union leaders were wrong to expect the euro to drive the
bloc on its own. (A: So in other words, you see, the Euro was
introduced to further amalgamate them under a central government system, a
central banking system, and they created the Bank of Europe, the central bank
of Europe. But itís not doing all of its jobs. So he says...)

"The current
crisis makes it relentlessly clear that we cannot have a common currency zone
without a common fiscal, economic and social policy," Schroeder
said. (A: You understand, thatís everything: fiscal,
economic and social policy.)

He added: "We
will have to give up national sovereignty." (A: Like
they havenít already.)

"From the
European Commission, we should make a government which would be supervised by
the European Parliament. And that means the United States of Europe."

Schroeder, who
nurtured a close relationship with France during his leadership, welcomed an
initiative launched by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President
Nicolas Sarkozy to move toward a fiscal union in 2012.

Their proposal,
which would mean giving up sovereignty over budgetary policies with the aim to
shore up the 17-nation currency union, has received a lukewarm response from
other euro zone countries. (A: This is all just step by step
with an old script they probably pulled out and blew the dust off, because itís
time to put it in, you see. And thatís how the world is really run; itís
not spur of the moment decisions. Itís got a definite goal; always had a
definite goal. And it was admitted, eventually in the 90s when they took
the secrecy off the European amalgamation, after they got all the countries
into it, they said in their initial charter theyíd
have to lie to the public because theyíd never go for losing their national
sovereignty. So they lied from 1948 right up to until the late
90s, and theyíre still lying today of course.)

"Germany and
France have sent a strong signal with the plan for a European economic
government, if it is meant seriously and receives suitable authority such as a
European finance minister," Schroeder said. (A: So they
want a European finance minister.)

"That is the
correct way forward and the precondition for the correct funding -- (A:
...which are...) euro bonds," he said.

Germany, which
enjoys lower costs for issuing debt than its single currency partners, has led
resistance to joint euro-denominated bonds.

So
itís all to do with cash too, as these psychopaths march on in their big
psychopathic club at the top knowing exactly where itís all going. And
youíre not supposed to know. Youíre supposed to think theyíre just, you
know, pulling at straws as they go down and drown at the last minute. Oh,
we better amalgamate completely and give up all sovereignty. You have
to go back and read the set-up of the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for
International Settlements, all these; thatís the banking group, this PRIVATE
banking group under the United Nations, which again, the Royal Institute of
International Affairs/CFR set up. And youíll find out this was planned a
long time ago. John Maynard Keynes wrote about it, its true purpose of these particular banks, was
to unite the GLOBE eventually. And the International Monetary Fund
was basically its big stick as well to keep all the countries in line and
eventually it would come up to part 2, the Bretton Woods Part 2 Agreement,
where theyíd create the new system for the whole planet and the IMF would do
all the bookkeeping. Thereíd be no localized, in other words, national
bookkeeping left; it would be open for the IMF who would do all your books;
itís pretty well there today. So weíre going into this global system, not
a nice pretty happy multicultural utopia; itís nothing to do with that.
Itís just that the peasants of each country are just the same as the peasant of
any other country in the eyes of the inbred top elite psychopaths that run it
all.

And
you ever wondered what happened to, you know, the skeletal remains of
cremation? Last week I talked about this liquid goo they were going to pour
you into. Thereís been a few articles about that for crematoriums being
done away with eventually. But theyíre still left with bits of skeleton
and so on, and they actually put them in road fill. They actually put
that stuff in road fill; have been doing it for years. It reminds me of
the fluoride which was really the scrapings of the inner chimneys when they
burnt off the different metals to make aluminum. And some bright spark
came up with the idea of rather than pay to have this poisonous stuff disposed
of, letís make the people drink it in their water and put it in their
toothpaste, and get them to buy it. And it worked awfully well.

Well,
what do they do with radiation, you know? Whenever radiation leaks
somewhere they grab all the topsoil, which is radioactive, and take it all away
and thatís the last you hear of it. And I know in Britain and some
countries, during the Cold War, they used to fly a lot of nuclear material over
populated areas; the US tended to ban that and took it by transport by road in
case there were accidents and keep it more local there. Britain has
pooh-poohed the whole idea that they did have accidents, which they did, and
that anyone got harmed. And documentaries came out a few years ago
showing where houses had been built and the people are coming down with
incredible cancers. And they come in with radiation monitors and they
find it screaming; the soil is screaming. Well, thatís where a lot of
this stuff from these accidents happened to end up, was the ground that these
houses were built on, still working well today.

Now,
in New York State there are...

Concerns over Falls road fill radiation (A:
This is how theyíve titled it.)

wivb.com / 31 Aug 2011 / Luke Moretti

NIAGARA FALLS, N.Y.
(WIVB) - A state lawmaker is calling for an investigation, and one expert in
radioactive waste management is expressing concern. The controversy involves
radioactive road fill in Niagara Falls and there are still lots of
questions. (A: But they really skip around it Ė Iíll read it to
you Ė but nobody asks, where did it come from? Back with more after this
break.)

Hi
folks, Iím back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about what
happens to radiation spills. What do they do with that stuff when they
take the topsoil away? Well, they put it back quietly; they sneak it in
different little ways thatís going to save them cash, and itís out of sight,
out of mind basically, unless someone catches on. And this actually came
into the newspaper through a tip from I guess a reader of the newspaper and
thatís what looked into it. It says...

Contractor David
Pfeiffer, who owns Man O' Trees Contracting, dropped a bombshell on the
reconstruction of Lewiston Road in Niagara Falls.

"The truth is
there is a health hazard on that project and it's not being properly cleaned
up," said Pfeiffer.

He tells News 4 that
he's learned that radiation levels, in some spots, are 10 times higher than the
normal background levels for that area.

Pfeiffer said,
"We were told not to chase the radiation, although it is on all of the
people's lawns." (A: In other words, they werenít to
concentrate on that and go elsewhere, like into the lawns, backyards and so
on. But itís on the folksí lawns as well; theyíre sitting on this
stuff. Thatís where the stuff goes. When thereís been a bad spill
you build houses on it, you see, and you dump the rest in holes, and potholes,
or actually make the road out of it, a mixture.† So there you have dead peopleís bits, from the skeletons from
cremation, plus you have radiation as well, you know, all the junk, they would
say at the top, the good psychopaths.)

Pfeiffer says his
workers have been told to stick to the road job, which is behind schedule and
over-budget by millions of dollars already.

Niagara Falls Mayor
Paul Dyster said, "The project is not a remedial project for removing
radioactive materials wherever they're found. It's a road construction project
in which radioactive materials that are under the road are being removed, and
so there are limits to the bounds of the project." (A: In
other words, they canít very well lift up the houses; theyíre certainly not
going to pay for that and take away all the topsoil that was dumped there.)

Dr. Marvin Resnikoff
said, "When you have levels that are 10 times greater and more, then yes,
I'm very concerned about that aspect of it."

Dr. Resnikoff is an
international consultant with of Radioactive Waste Management Associates who's
familiar with the Niagara Falls situation.

"In my opinion,
that material should be taken out now. This material is going to stay
radioactive essentially forever. Roads are going to come and go. You
know, kicking the can down the road is not going to solve the problem,"
said Dr. Resnikoff. (A: Not unless the folk all die of cancer,
and donít know whatís killing them.)

Now, one state
lawmaker says there should be an independent investigation.

Senator George
Maziarz said, "Somebody is not telling the truth. Let's find out who it
is. I don't want to see an unsafe condition, a hazardous condition covered up.
That is not in anyone's best interest." (A: However, the
governmentís response was...)

A state Health
Department spokesperson tells News 4 that radiation monitoring methods used by
the agency have not detected a health risk to workers (A: Ah, so itís
okay.) and that the radioactive slag in question is not in a form that can
be breathed in or swallowed. (A: Itís just sitting there giving
off radioactive waves for God knows how far. But thatís your standard
government. Thatís what the government thinks of you folks, as they take
your homes through the banks and all the other cons and tax you into the
grave.)

Quite
something else isnít it? But thatís quite standard. And youngsters
now too, another link Iím putting up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, youngsters
are now coming down with strokes, one-third higher than ever before.

CDC: Strokes rising among younger ages

yourlife.usatoday.com / Steven Reinberg

The number of people
aged 15 to 44 hospitalized for stroke jumped by more than a third between 1995
and 2008. (A: Of course, itís no big mystery according to them,
because theyíre not looking into the causes, which means itís meant to happen,
just like us all going sterile.)

Another
article tonight Iíll put up a link to is...

Ear-bashing: feeling the
heat in a city that forever beeps - Tim Elliott / smh.com.au / September 3, 2011

Itís
about basically the pollution that you get, electro-pollution, or electro-smog
as itís called in America, because of all the microwave thatís flying through
the air all the time through cordless phones and cell phones, wireless
networks, and lots of low-level radio frequency radiation and what it does to
people. Iíll put that link up too.

Now,
maybe it was a couple of years ago that I read an article by some young wealthy
person who was born with probably a gold spoon in her mouth. And she
married another guy with a gold spoon in his mouth. And they made a career of
going across the world, looking at bugs and things, probably for some big
organization at the United Nations, big governmental funding, etc. Then she
came out with an article about we should
eat insects, you see, to change
our diet and eat insects. I went through the article there; it
would be in the archives section of my site. Here is the latest one. It
says...

Scorpion in your soup? EU

(A:
The European Union, again, this big Soviet dictatorship of the EU...) spends £2.5m encouraging people to eat insects

(A:
This is the latest. So theyíre actually spending money to make you think this
is wonderful stuff.)

dailymail.co.uk / Anna Edwards / 4th September 2011

Nutrition experts (A:
Whatís a nutrition expert? What IS a nutrition expert, eh?) have
found a cheap way to help save the environment (A: Well, this is an
environmentalist. Is that a nutrition expert? See how itís all BS?
Anyway...) and solve the food shortage crisis. (A: What food
shortage crisis? What? They put all the farms out of business.)

They have found an
abundant supply of food rich in calcium and protein, while low in fat.

But the squeamish
might want to look away now - because the food source is insects.

The European Union
thinks creepy crawlies should start appearing on menus after experts in
Brussels (A: Oh, Brussels again, eh? They have Brussels
sprouts.) recommended that bugs could be a vital source of nutrition, The
Sunday Times newspaper reported. (A: Iíd like to see them eating
at the G20 and all these characters from the EU parliament, at these, you know,
billion, well, it was 1.5 billion dollar doís and bashes that they have, where
millions go for their 2 or 3 day meals, and the stuff that they eat, incredible
stuff. Iíd like to see them eating insects. Iíd like to see them
eating insects; Iíd give them stinging bees or wasps or something. Back
with more after this break.)

Hi
folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about how youíre going
to eat insects shortly because thatís been ordered from the top down that you
do so. And you will eventually because theyíve been saying it for years
at the top that youíre going to have a
vegetarian diet, at least nonmeat, put it that way, and they say it must be so, that way. And
thatís how itís going to be; whatever they want they get. Youíre living
in a total socialist system where science runs, on behalf of the masters at the
top science runs your lives. And unfortunately most folk will probably go
for it, you know. Thatís just the way they are. Put lots of sauce on it
and you wonít think anything of it. Anyway it says here that...

The European Union
thinks creepy crawlies should start appearing on menus after experts (A:
Here are these experts again.) in Brussels recommended that bugs could be a
vital source of nutrition, The Sunday Times newspaper reported.

So scorpion soup and
cricket casserole (A: I know what part of the casserole Iíd use for
their...) could soon be options, as the European Commission has now offered
£2.65million into a project to promote eating insects. (A: In
other words, giving grants out for the psychopaths who havenít quite made it
yet, to grab and convince you to do so.)

They have also
ordered the (A: Theyíve ORDERED... ) UK Food Standards Agency to
investigate and potentially look at ways to make entomophagy - the eating of
insects - a more popular choice.

One study found that
grasshoppers offer 20 per cent protein with a tiny six per cent fat, compared
to lean ground beef's 24 per cent protein and 18 per cent fat. (A:
So thatís supposed to be the plug for it.)

The research
institute that offers the best proposal for investigating 'insects as novel
sources of proteins' will be awarded the money by the commission.

They will have to
research quality and safety, potential allergies and what sort of proteins the
insects offer. (A: You know, we would have noses like anteaters,
you understand, if we were meant to eat these things all the time. You
understand that? But we donít, you see. Well, most of us.)

Professor Marcel
Dicke, leading a team at Wageningen University, in Holland, is applying for the
grant.

He told the Sunday
Times: 'By 2020 you will be buying insects in supermarkets.

'We have already
seen the introduction of eggplants, sushi, things people never ate here. I
think it will start with ground-up insects in sauces and burgers.'

Snacking on silkworm
moth larvae or adding blitzed bees to sauces could offer a much-needed solution
to soaring costs of red meat. (A: Itís because theyíve put so
many of the farmers under and you got the 5 agri-food businesses that run
everything else. But as I say, the politicians wonít be eating insects,
believe you me.)

And
yeah, theyíve got the whole script; the whole futureís planned out for you
all. I hope you realize that, as you entertain yourselves to death.
Now thereís a caller on the line there thatís been hanging on. I think
itís Mark from Texas. Are you there Mark?

Mark: Alan, Iím not sure if I want to say anything
after that last comment.

Alan: Thatís right. I know. Itís quite
something, eh?

Mark: Alan, do you know how much money the federal
government and the Canadian governments have spent to prop up the
internet? I mean, thereís no telling how many billions of dollars have
been spent through public/private partnerships.† How many months do you think it will be before both countries
come out and they announce through their propagandas that we need a postmaster
attorney general for internet email?

Alan: Actually they have. They have floated
that idea. They havenít made it law but theyíve been floating that idea
of exactly that under a particular committee that theyíve mentioned. So
youíre right; they have been.

Mark: I havenít heard of that. I havenít
heard but I can see where that could also lend itself straight into digital
currency.† Which is the new, itís like,
you know, because itís all for your benefit, youíd only pay 2 cents to send
a letter in the mail, donít you know.

Alan: Oh, thatís how they get people. Thatís
how they always get people. And then they do away with the other service
eventually, and say, well thereís not enough people using it so we canít go
the old way, so youíre stuck with this new way. Then they jack up the
price.

Mark: Right. The new way, itís twofold. Itís
not just convenience, itís laziness plus, currency wise, itís cheaper. So
itís actually two ways they get ya.

Alan: Oh, yeah. And folk have no idea how
itís even done to them because most folk do float through life; they learn by
osmosis. Bit and bytes of info from a thousand sources hit them. They
donít reason through any of them, but theyíre being programmed all the time.
But you know, even the fashion industry helped promote cashless currency.
Did you know that? The fashion industry, they were approached by the governments
and the banks to finds ways of encouraging, especially the young up-and-coming
people, that would be the first generation, how could they stop them from
carrying cash? Well, they gave them these particular pants with the very
flat pockets, etc, so they would bulge out if you put anything big in them, and
that doesnít go well with youngsters. So they gave them the little flap
pockets in the front there, that just held a credit card. And they were
paid millions for doing this, for designing these clothes and promoting it
across to the youngsters through music television and different ways, to get
them to go cashless. The public have no idea of the millions of ways
theyíre manipulated all the time.

Mark: Well you remember the easy-pass?
Thatís the big thing now.† Even with
truckers going into a bar, you have an easy-pass. You just walk in and
you come back out and itís billed to you in the mail.

Alan: Thatís right. And sometimes thereís
extra on top because you pass out in the bar and they carry you out.
[Alan laughing.]

Mark: But the problem is it wonít be through the
mail anymore.

Alan: I know.

Mark: It will be through the internet.

Alan: Absolutely. They said years ago, and I
even have the articles in my archives somewhere, that eventually government, all government agencies will talk
directly to you. In fact, theyíre doing it some areas and people
are signing up for them, where government departments will notify you of
something that concerns you personally. Youíll be doing your taxes on
it. Theyíll be contacting you. And it will be interactive so as
youíre putting figures up there theyíll be adjusting the figures for the ones
you didnít put in. [Alan chuckles.] But this is all literally in
the works right now and some people are actually using this kind of
stuff. So youíre right. And they knew theyíd do this even before we
were given the internet, when you read the cryptic writings of people who
helped plan the world system; they talked about this kind of thing.

Mark: Itís going to be interesting. Alan,
thanks for taking the call, sir.

Alan: And thanks for calling.

Mark: Bye now.

Alan: Bye.†
Yeah, itís quite the system. Folk have no idea of the myriad of
ways in which youíre manipulated, constantly. CONSTANTLY... What to
think, what to wear, how to look, and how to behave even, whatís now
politically correct, whatís not politically correct, etc. They are
conditioned all the time and theyíre upgraded just like a computer system.

Another
thing too, Iím putting up tonight, is to do with the ICLEI. Thatís the
local governments for sustainability. Iíll put up a site tonight where
you can actually find out if your local government, or your state, or your
province in Canada, or even your country is in on it and it will tell you the
different members and where they are and so on, that set up this part of Agenda
21. So many fronts. Remember, the communists had fronts. They
had, oh, thousands of fronts in the US alone; they even had church groups
involved that were conned into it, not knowing they were a front to push
communism. Well, why throw a good system away when it works? So
thatís what they use, of course, for Agenda 21. And when so many people
were talking out against Agenda 21 and it became known they changed a lot of
its wording. So you have Ďsustainabilityí... anything with
Ďsustainabilityí is part of Agenda 21. So this is the ICLEI one, one of
the big ones. And they just get themselves appointed over your local
councils, state councils, provincial councils, and just sit there quite quietly
from the general public, but theyíre making all the rules, about can you sell
your home; well what would the social impact and the environmental impact be
if you sell your home, who will buy it. And then they do another fee for
engineers to come out and say, oh what will the environmental impact be
if this person moves into that home.

Money
after money after money and grabs and grabs and grabs by these psychopathic
liars that smell the wind and get onto an awful good thing. So Iíll put
this link up and you can look up your own country or area or town or whatever,
and itís quite an interesting one to go through.

iclei.org

And
also tonight Iíd like to mention, to do with NAFTA, the North American Free
Trade Agreement. Theyíre really busy all over Latin America bringing in
new members, new members, fairly on the quiet; little bits sneak into the
papers here. And even Harper, the Prime Minister of Canada, was
criticized by his own party for going down there and keeping everything secret
from his party. But it doesnít matter because as Quigley said, every member of the Council on Foreign
Relations Ė and the Canadian branch changes its name about year ago, the
same thing though. They said that
they always, every Prime Minister and President that youíve had since the late
1800s have been a member of the this particular organization, under its various
names.

This
article here, itís a PDF in fact, about how they announce themselves, the
Council on Foreign Relations. Weíre
a superior think tank who advise policy makers. You see.
Itís a private organization, a private organization set up in London when it
started, by international money lenders, not just bankers, who with the Cecil
Rhodes group, carried on the same policies, to take over all the worldís
resources and to amalgamate the world into one, first through regions and blocs
and then into one governmental system, with themselves on top advising all the
states Ė they call the different countries the states Ė advising them on
different policies. In other words, being the top boss. But theyíre
a PRIVATE group, a private organization. And you got to go into the
history of it; itís quite easy to find. They make up the policies for
NAFTA; they drafted up the NAFTA policies. This private group, that you donít
elect, drafted up the NAFTA deal, the Free Trade Agreement and the NAFTA
agreement. They drafted it up for the European amalgamation as
well. And we donít elect them, this private group, you see. And they came
on national television in Canada in 2005 and admitted it. Under their own
little banner for the first time, they came out and says, yeah, we drafted it up for the amalgamation of
the Americas basically.

Global Brazil and
U.S.-Brazil Relations (PDF) - i.cfr.org

So
here theyíre talking about Brazil in this particular PDF and itís interesting
that they say, that by the year 2016
Brazil, India, China and Russia, as up-and-coming countries Ė now I
donít know how Chinaís an up-and-coming country, except for the fact weíre
still financing them for hospitals and stuff and building schools for them, and
give them lots of free trade deals, literally free. They say that theyíll overtake all of America and its output and by
2016. Because weíre funding them into existence just as weíre
funding Brazil into existence and it goes on about that. And it says too,
being the main think tank that advises the US government, theyíre advising the government in the US, and
Canada, to not only accept Brazil in with all these full powers including
security council on the United Nations Ė thatís their little feather in
the cap for them; that gets them in Ė
that we should treat them as absolute equals and maybe eventually weíll have to
give up, again, some of OUR own power, meaning authority, or even sovereignty,
in the deal as well as time goes on. So you have to wade through
all the rubbish... They always give you dry stuff; most folk canít, you
know, the people who canít think very long, for a minute or so, without
something distracting them, they will never get through the first little part
of it. But you can just scroll down through it to get to the nitty-gritty
stuff, and they stop congratulating all the writers Ė theyíre past all that Ė
into the real stuff, the meat of it. And youíll find out that this is
well on its way.

And
itís interesting too, that the President of Brazil, go into her history.
Itís got the usual story of daddy, daddy being an ardent communist but somehow
he got in trouble and he had to rush out of Bulgaria, he ran off to Paris I
think, or France, and then he went to Portugal for a while. And wherever
he went he taught communism. Strange that, that a Marxist Communist would have
to escape the country, would make a career teaching communism. And
somehow he went to South America and he just make good. But he was teaching
Marxist classes all along too and he ends up dying, leaving umpteen ranches
behind him. They seem to acquire and accumulate an awful lot of wealth on
the way, these Marxists, donít they? Itís an interesting little story if
you go into who she is, who her daddy was and all the rest of it. Awful
interesting story. But they donít mention that in the Council on
Foreign Relations, but they do like the Marxist system, as I say, to control
the masses for those who acquire all the incredible wealth at the top. But I
love those stories of guys running off, you know, rags-to-riches; theyíre
awfully fond of them at the top there. So Iíll put that one up tonight.

Now
Glasgow in Scotland, they twinned cities a long time ago, you see, to make us
feel more international. So as that the peasant in Glasgow would feel
awful like the peasant in China, I supposed, only heís paying a lot more money
for everything that he has to consume, or even feed himself. This says...

Glasgow's twin city is selling living prisoners'
organs to health tourists

news.scotsman.com / Billy Briggs / 6th September 2011

(A: By the
way, you helped fund them. The one they twin you with, you help fund
them.)

HOSPITALS in
Glasgow's twin city in China sell organs taken illegally from innocent people
executed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), campaigners claimed last night.

Ahead of an
international conference today in Glasgow about organ harvesting (A: I
hate that term. Itís like youíre farming, isnít it? But we are farmed, as
Fort said.), a Nobel Peace Prize nominee said the illegal practice is rife
in Dalian, a city in north east China with which Scotland's largest city has
been twinned since 1987.

Delegates attending
the event - hosted by Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH) - will
hear claims the Chinese regime removes organs from prisoners who are still
alive and that wealthy "health tourists" travel to China to buy
kidneys and livers available on the black market.

(A: Well,
itís nothing really new if youíve been watching this stuff; itís been going on
for a while. But you see, itís not for you or anybody else.
No. But theyíll kill you. Do you understand, weíre all DNA typed?
Do you know that? Do you know what the Human Genome Project was about,
apart from basic eugenics, to find out, well, you know, weíve looked at the
parentsí and the grandparentsí and great-grandparentsí health histories and IQs
and so on, and weíve got a pretty predictable outcome for this person here,
this baby here, as they prick their heel and take their blood, and have been
doing for 30-odd years and lying to the public. And anyone whoís gone for
a blood test, they always send one sample off to the same darn thing. So
they know who you are. They know what DNA typing you are; you got to get a
close DNA typing to get a good organ, you see, that will last a few
years. And the closer the better. So in China you just dial them up
basically and theyíll find somebody, a prisoner or whoever, or even someone
whoís not in prison... oh, so-and-so
matches it; they just work in a restaurant, grab them, or convict them of
something, pull them in and wick out their organ. And of course,
you got to get it out of a live donor; they donít want them to die.
They got to have brain activity still there and theyíll still be breathing,
etc, otherwise itís kind of, you know, they have to put it down to, I donít
know, sell it on e-Bay or something. The fresher it is the better it is
for them. And thereís a lot more bucks in it as well. So the rich
folk travel to China to buy kidneys and livers, available on the black market.)

Speakers include,
David Matas, a Canadian human rights lawyer who was nominated for the Nobel
Peace Prize last year for exposing China's illegal organ trade.

The victims of
China's organ business are said to be mainly people arrested for practising
Falun Gong, a spiritual movement banned by the CCP. Falun The CCP claims Falun
Gong is a dangerous cult and outlawed it for "illegal activities" in
1999. (A: Kind of like what theyíre doing to the Mennonites
trying to sell milk, you know, real milk to the people.)

Mr Matas is
co-author of Bloody Harvest - The Killing of Falun Gong for their Organs, for
which he received his Nobel nomination last year.

Mr Matas said that
between 2000 and 2005 there were 41,500 transplants carried out in China
whereby the only explanation for the sourcing was imprisoned Falun Gong
practitioners. (A: See, theyíre not dumb, the communists.
You know, how do we get rid of these
pesky organizations and make a profit at the same time? Communism is
awfully good at profiting. Back with more after this break.)

Hi
folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix and Iím also putting a link up to
the latest United Nations soldiers raping a Haitian teenager, which is up on
YouTube. Itís from The Guardian newspaper too and other newspapers.

Is this Minustah's 'Abu
Ghraib moment' in Haiti?

Shock video of UN soldiers apparently
raping a Haitian teenager raises questions about why these 'peacekeepers' are
there at all - Mark Weisbrot / guardian.co.uk \ 3 September 2011

Theyíll
probably just say itís their sexual preference to gang rape somebody and no
doubt thereíll be a group shortly saying, well thatís just what we prefer.
So Iíll put that up tonight.

Alan: Thereís another caller there. Itís Tom
from Wisconsin if heís on the line. Are you there Tom?

Tom: I just wanted to mention a couple things
tonight; I know weíre short on time. The Tea Party name, that the Tea
Partiers go by, they donít even understand, and you can correct me if Iím wrong
on this. But I heard and saw on a presentation last night that it was a
group of Masons that carried out the Boston Tea Party event. What had
happened was they had lowered, the parliament in Britain lowered the actual
taxes on tea and since the Masons were smuggling in the tea because of the
exorbitant tax rates they were a little irritated with that event. So they went
and they cancelled their meeting that night, the night of the Boston Tea Party,
and dressed up as Indians and threw the tea overboard. And itís just
incredible to me that, I donít know how we should expect to actually beat this
system at its own game when the very histories that weíve been taught in school
are so corrupted. Itís really incredible.

Alan: Absolutely. Thatís a very sentient
point and itís vital to understand that, you canít save a system thatís been
secretive from the beginning, and misleading from the beginning, and has had an
agenda from the beginning. Remember too, Franklin himself said that he hoped this federation of states would become
a federation of world states, run by 12 wise men. Thatís in his
own diaries; you can see that at the Franklin Institute or you can buy a copy
of his own letters and writings. So they knew where they were
going. Whatís interesting too, youíre quite right. He admits in
that book, that it was nothing to do with
the cost of tea or the stamp act that started off this war. He
says, we used that as an excuse.
I mean, how much tea would you have to buy in a year to even notice the amount
of tax that they put on it? So it wasnít that at all. And he also
admitted it was planned for years and years and years ahead, the revolution,
with smugglers coming into islands and to the coast bringing in powder, shot,
all the stuff you would need for a war, up to 20 years before it started.
And they also admitted they used the youth an awful lot, the energetic youth
who would want a fight; they used them to help kick it off.† Whatís interesting too, I mean dressing up
as Indians and letting them take the blame, is maybe part of the technique
thatís still used today.

Tom: And then I recently got a job at a reasonably
quality, as far as fast food goes, a place called Koppís here in Brookfield,
Wisconsin. And it amazes me how popular Diet Coke is, credit card swipes
are, and how absolutely ignorant the youth are. Theyíre dumb, they donít
know anything. And the managers, the older people who are my age or
younger, donít know anything either. And I try and explain to them, like
on the whole income tax issue, thereís no federal law. Thereís no federal
law, so itís optional. I donít have to pay this.

Alan: We donít have to except that Mao Tse Tung
said that power comes from the barrel of
a gun, and the big boys have them all. [Alan laughing.] I
mean, thatís basically it. So itís power of might. And youíre quite
right, dumbed-down population, and in mammals, if you donít warn the young what
to be weary of theyíll think itís all normal and theyíll ask no
questions. Thanks for calling.

From
Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada Ė and remember too, help donate and keep
me going here, things are pretty bad Ė itís good night and may your God or your
Gods GO with you.