Manny Machado is officially a Dodger, but how did the Orioles do in the return?

It’s been long expected that Baltimore Orioles’ shortstop Manny Machado would be heading to the Los Angeles Dodgers, with that even coming up during the All-Star Game broadcast Tuesday night, but the deal became official Wednesday. In return for Machado, the Dodgers are sending the Orioles five prospects, led by double-A outfielder Yusniel Diaz and also including double-A pitcher Dean Kremer, class-A pitcher Zach Pop, class-A infielder Rylan Bannon and triple-A utility player Breyvic Valera. But there are plenty of takes on if that was enough of a return or not. First, Yahoo’s Jeff Passan argued that the Orioles did pretty well:

Rarely is there a consensus in deals like this, but every evaluator I've asked thinks Baltimore did well in Manny Machado trade. Also think with the strong market — Brewers, Phillies, Diamondbacks and others — and deep system the Dodgers could overpay. Mutually beneficial deal.

And The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal noted that this return is only for half a season of Machado, as he’s a free agent after the year:

When assessing #Orioles’ return for Machado, remember that #Dodgers only are acquiring him for 66 games (plus potential postseason). Diaz, 21, was batting .314 with a .905 OPS at Double A. Rival exec: “Super talented, good player, a legit guy to get back for a rental.”

We’ll see how this deal works out for everyone in the end. But at the moment, it seems like something that could help both teams. The contending Dodgers acquired one of the best players in the game, and did so without giving up anyone on their major-league roster. Meanwhile, the Orioles pulled in a reasonably-decent return for a half-season rental. If those prospects turn into anything, it will look even better for them. But even if the prospects don’t work out, Baltimore certainly wasn’t in contention this year, and Machado probably wasn’t sticking around after that. We’ll see how it winds up, but this is a deal that could work for both sides.

"I sent a text to each player individually to present an opportunity for open communication with me. Many members of our team chose to respond and have more in-depth conversations about issues and feelings. Marvin is right. It was a mistake to use the word 'every.' Particularly at this time, words are important, and I'm sorry."

"I sent a text to each player individually to present an opportunity for open communication with me. Many members of our team chose to respond and have more in-depth conversations about issues and feelings. Marvin is right. It was a mistake to use the word 'every.' Particularly at this time, words are important, and I'm sorry."