Unites States of America v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing
251

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a CONFERENCE proceeding held on 5/8/13 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(Rodriguez, Somari)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA / Plaintiff(s)
v.
APPLE, INC. , ET AL.
Defendant(s)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 12 CV 2826
NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT
Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding type held on date
proceeding held has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter.
Redaction responsibilities apply to the attorneys of record or pro se parties, even if the
person requesting the transcript is a judge or a member of the public or media.
The parties have seven (7) calendar days from the date of filing of this NOTICE to file
with the court any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript. A
copy of said NOTICE must also be served on the court reporter. If no such NOTICE is filed, the
transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after
ninety (90) calendar days.
This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: SocialSecurity numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1. Parties wishing to
request redaction of other information may proceed by motion.
/s LINDA FISHER
_________________________
Court Reporter
Date:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.