Isaac, that is an interesting observation about the location of the tremor and the Nisqually earthquake location. Nisqually quake.
The USGS write-up suggests the eq was caused by normal faulting
inside the subducting Juan de Fuca because of the slab bending downward more steeply at that point.
The Wiki page (without an attributable source

) says the cause was because of
a volume change in the rock due to a mineral phase transition.

Whichever mechanism is correct, maybe the tremor is a symptom of the that process at that location. I did see one graph that looked like the
previous episode (to the Nisqually quake) occurred in December 2000. (I can't remember where I found that graph, though )

Well, the "official" northern tremor episode is over, but tremor has been picked up everyday but one, since it ended. Almost all of this most
recent tremor has been located in northern California. Here is the map for the past 2 days:

Using the Real-time tremor map it looks as if the tremor was active just before this small
Mag 3.5 (USGS) located just over 100 km due west. The depth is listed
at 21.7 km, which might put the earthquake on the subduction interface, or possibly in the down-going slab; my best guess looking at the available
maps is on the interface.

Just thought I would throw all of this out there; with the Mag 5.3 last night on the San Andreas, some pushing and shoving just north of the Mendocino
triple junction doesn't seem unreasonable.

The ETS centered under Trinity and Siskiyou counties in northern California is continuing. It has not migrated in any particular direction. (On
second look, maybe a tad west, after comparing this map to the one in the post above).
Here is the tremor map for the past 2 days, courtesy of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network.

I set the map to show events over time and the satellite view, in order to show the tremor in relation to the subducting Gorda (and further north,
Juan de Fuca) plate.

Anybody notice this "earthquake" in Oregon at approximately 14:18:45 UTC? Here it is in IRIS
Station B033.PB..EHZ (located just east of
Roseburg).

Something doesn't seem quite right about it, but I can't put a finger on it. I was guessing it was something sonic, but the arrival times on all
of the seismos I've checked look too close for it to be sound waves. Still no listing on USGS or PNSN.

It seemed to have abnormally low amplitude for such a long duration event. Scroll down and check out all of the the K*** NC stations on
this page. It makes it look like a teleseism, but I don't see anything
yet.

I'm curious because the tremor that has been ongoing in northern CA for the past 7 days seems to have decided to jump up and down the entire CSZ
today. Check out the past 12 hours on the Realtime tremor map (click the 12 button).

Westcoast, Puter, Muzzy, JohnVidale, Anyone? What do you think? It shows on seismos stretching over 400kms--it was something...

Well, after some more measuring of the distance between seismic stations and arrival times for those stations,my best estimate is that the waves were
traveling approx. 6.75 km/s. That would put them in the seismic range.

I was feeling pretty pleased with myself for working that out, then I checked, USGS again, and found that it was indeed, an earthquake. Go me, lol.
It was waaaay out on the spreading ridge: details here .

So, a good learning exercise--I'm so very slowly getting the hang of this.

First, the ongoing tremor in northern California slowed down on the 25th and 26th, but picked up again yesterday the 27th. Here is the map showing
the past 3 days, courtesy of PNSN .

Now, onto the Realtime tremor map. Click on the "12" button; it will list the tremor bursts
detected up and down the CSZ over the past 12 hours. And if you scroll down to the bottom of the list, and then hover your mouse over the times and
slowly move up the list, you'll see the tremor begin at 20:07:30 under Vancouver Island. Just minutes after the Mag 7.7 hit farther north, on the
Queen Charlotte fault.

Here is a map of the Queen Charlotte fault in relation to the northern end of the Cascadia Subduction zone.

The spread of aftershocks southward is worrisome to me. Here is a quote from John Vidale, found on the PNSN
mainpage:

This earthquake likely applied some additional stress to the faults we are concerned with in the Puget Sound and will have local aftershocks that
are prominent for weeks. As usual, the chance of further seismic activity in the immediate vicinity of this earthquake will be higher than normal for
a while, but does not rise to the level at which any actions are warranted.

so if cascadia fault goes, and shakes the ground enough to make yellowstone pop, AND causes the new madrid fault to crack... would that be 2012 enough
for everyone. Oh and lets throw a gigantic sun flare in there to, we cant have an electrical grid working when this happens, that would be to easy.
While we are at it, lets say that huge comet coming in 2013 november crashes to earth just to add a cherry.

Your the Jackass my friend. Trying to blame someone who's pointing out the obvious. I would say to you that knowledge is powerful and the ignorance
ain't bliss. Forwarning people of danger is a good thing. It can save lives. Save yourself with your sermon.

That is a lot of random tremor, especially considering that we just finished one of the biggest tremor episodes in the northern portion of the zone on
the 12th of October. This last event released (approximately) the moment equivalant of a magnitude 6.5 earthquake, but it did it over 42 days.

It seems as if the big earthquake up on the Queen Charlotte fault stimulated tremor throughout the northern portion of Cascadia. Maybe the
tremor would have happened anyway, even if the Mag 7.7 (and aftershocks) had not occurred; but the timing is curious.

And the tremor is continuing today, as you can see on the realtime tremor map.
The aftershocks from yesterday's quake seem to be slowing, and the slight elevation in risk of a triggered earthquake is heading to zero as time
passes....which is all great news.

Hello. I was just curious if anyone else in the Pacific Northwest is experiencing strange behavior from their animals? My dog is clingy and hiding
below my feet and the cat is meowing and following us everywhere in the house . . . probably nothing as they might be freaked out by traffic or some
other factor.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.