Ratings & Reviews

1

large amount of videos and images. Video resolution is 480x640 in the older videos with 4 Mb/s bitrates. The new ones are 1280x720 at 5 Mb/s bitrates. Daily updates: one video and one photo set. The preview pages accurately provide the content in member section.

Cons:

The site and the bonus sites are plagued with speed problems (at least from the US, east and west coasts). The download speed are 13 kb/s and lower which makes the download of a typical 50 Mb video to take over an hour. Complains about this with the webmaster remain unresolved.

Bottom Line:

The site has a very large amount of content but their download speeds are so slow that the navigation experience is frustrating and video downloads are all but impossible. For this reason the site content is useless and unless their navigation improve dramatically, potential customers should stay away.

2

Huge amount of content. Image resolution is now 2000x3000 since early 2011. Images prior to 2007
were at 1024x712 max and after Jan 2007 1024x1546 was the max resolution offered. The video resolution has also improved. They are now offered in 4 formats: stream, HD mp4, SD mp4 and wmv. There are 174 movie galleries as of this writing, with an average of 10 movies per gallery. However, most of the galleries are not at the highest resolution listed above, but are offered in mov or wmv format at 720x480 resolution.

Cons:

Many.
1) The site is now plagued with speed problems. They consolidated all sites in one server and as a result, there is a 5-10 seconds delay for images to load on the browser after the thumbnails are clicked. They added extra security (each image now has a key identifier, which changes with customer session). As a result the navigation experience is sluggish and at times frustrating. Request to change go unheard and for the most part they don;t seem to care.
2) The models as of late are a major disappointment. Most sets are boring, girls are not even that attractive (for the most part) or hairy and the quality of the images (even-though they offer them now at 2000x3000) are not well color balanced, i.e there is no quality control here. Just sheer volume of more and more boring stuff. Karupspc and karupsha has about the same type of content but with hotter looking models.
3) there is less of a difference between amkingdom and atkhairy when it comes to models and content as of late

Bottom Line:

The ATK Kingdom sites went through a major redesign for --most would agree, the worse for this one. If you have never been a member, ATKHAIRY for the price and content volume is a very good deal. If you have been a member before, say last year, don't bother re-subscribing. ATK really needs to rethink what it is they want to offer in terms of quality and a content which is true to the amateur and hairy niche they were known for in the past. Perhaps they should abandon the 8 updates per day, be more discriminating and at least offer much better quality and truly hairy amateur content. The site is neither amateur nor hairy anymore and there is very little difference between AMKINGDOM and ATKHAIRY content these days. I leave you with this statistic: in 2010 they posted 1600 sets of unshaved models in their "scary" (what a terrible and misleading label) category, of which only 14 or so models (FOURTEEN) could be judged as truly natural and hairy. That is not much content for a site that caters to amateur and hairy lovers.

3

Very amateur looking models (about 120 as of this writing) The pictures are of good quality (few sets at 1920x1320 resolution), most are just reposts of previous sets at lower resolution (about 80 sets with about 100-120 images per set at 1280x1024).
There is an archive section of image sets of about 40 models (between 10-50 images per set at lower resolution)

Cons:

Navigation is simple.
No zips of the sets and the webmaster has gone through some pains to make sure that images can be downloaded one at a time (unless you know more than most folks about html and can download them in batch mode).
Very little in terms of updates. About 12 new models in more than a year, that averages out to less than 1 per month.
No movies or clips of any kind
Outrageously high price (29.95/month) for what is being offered. The site is probably worth more like 14.95

Bottom Line:

Nice looking models which appear to be real amateur (girls who probably feel comfortable showing their feet but nothing else). However, the fact that most are willing to pose in their underwear makes it more "interesting". No Zipz for the image sets, No movies or clips, extremely high proce for such a low amount of content. If you enjoy beautiful looking girls and their lower extremities, you are 'much,much' better off subscribing to stes like noemisworld, feetjeans, These sites offer a lot of more content, better image quality at a much lower price.

4

Very little in terms of positives here.
Image quality is good. Largest image resolution is 1200x1600. Standard is 1024x768. Large amount of models (if you are new to the site). There are about 80 videos in windows format, 640x468 at 2200K. Donny lists some as HD but it is a joke since they are at 640x360 resolution and slight higher bit rate (2500K instead of 2200K).Laughable. The costs has been dropped to $ 19.95 from 29.95 as of this writing.

Cons:

I have been a member of this site in the past. Nothing new here since 2007. That's 3 years without any new content. Donny recycles the old content and posts it as new updates. So if you have never been to his site, you may want to check it out, otherwise it is not worth it.

Bottom Line:

Donny is a photographer from Northern California (Sacramento, Chico area) His content has appeared in the ATK sites, particularly atkgalleria and atkexotics. Lately (last 3 years) his site has not really been updated. The old material is shamelessly recirculated as new but no new models have made it to the web site for years. The price of $19.95 is still to high. I think $10.95/month is probably what the site is worth right now. I gave him a rating of 50 because that is the lowest score allowed. It really should be more like 45.

5

All content is exclusive.
Girls seem to be all amateur.
33 models, 52 image sets so far with an average of 100 images/set.
Image Resolution is 600x800 on the site but all sets can be downloaded at 1152x1728 resolution.
Reasonably priced

Cons:

No videos.
Navigation is poor and needs to be improved.
Most sets offer some nudity, topless or complete nude but not continental (no open shots or toys).

Bottom Line:

Content is exclusive and most girls are quite attractive. The preview pages accurately reflect the member content. However, the sets are for the most part not erotic at all. Just a sequence of images, some poorly list where the girls stand in boring poses in various stages of undressing, many just to their panties. Navigation is a problem. If one is to view the images at a resolution higher than 600x800, the entire set needs to be downloaded first.

6

Most picture sets are of models who seem to be exclusive (except for Marketa and a couple of other models)
81 picture sets with 20-40 images/set (1064x1600 resolution)
13 videos 720x576 (windows)

Cons:

Image quality is very amateurish with bad lighting and not much detailed. Some of them look they were scanned from 35mm slides not digitally shot.
The videos mostly of non-exclusive content and not of the models in the image section
Navigation is very plain
No zips (not that you need this feature) Did not find anything worth downloading)

Bottom Line:

I'm not sure how to place this site with respect to other young amateur sites of much better quality and content. Some of the girls are slim, very attractive and very next-door type in their looks. Image quality is poor and the videos are not of the girls in the image section. The preview page accurately depicts the content in this site. Higher quality content and better navigation will improve this site considerably.

7

Exclusive content
Gorgeous-looking models
Large amount of content (304 models, some with 2-3 image sets with amount 60-80 images/set)
Excellent image quality in the highest resolution (2000x3000 or 2600x3900 for newst sets)
About 108 videos in DivX and WMV format.

Cons:

Images display in 3 sizes 400x600, 700x1024 and highest resolution. The lower resolutions are useless. It should be better for the members if they offered their images in 700x1024 (small), 1600x2400 (medium) and orig resolution.
Download speeds are very slow (< 100kB/s) both in east and west coast of the US. This would explain why they offer such a small size images.
It can take over 30-45 minutes to download one set. Downloading videos can take so long that most of the video content of this site is practically non-viewable.

Bottom Line:

The site offers a large amount of content of very good quality (image sets and videos). The navigation needs to be improved along with their download speeds in order to make this site worth the price of admission. Given that many of their photographers also have their work shown in better sites such as met-art, metmodels, Femjoy, this site really has a way to go before being able to offer the same type of navigation/download experience as those sites.

8

Disagree with TheRisso on exclusivity. While the picture quality is not as good as in olderwomen, auntjudys or allover30, one can find most of the models here in those other sites.

Customer can be locked-out after just a couple of mistyped passwords. Getting the account re-activated requires contacting the webmaster and waiting for at least 24 hours.

Most picture sets offer a repetitive theme with pretty much the same setting.

Bottom Line:

A site which offers pretty good amount of content, both softcore and hardcore. The image quality of the sets is not as good as sites as allover30 or olderwomen but the movies are probably the best thing at this site.

9

poor image quality and low resolution (1024x768 max). Ditto on Videos. Sets are very plain with no explicit nudity. Terrible navigation system. There is no way to go directly to listed updates. One has to guess the model and then go to the model page.

Bottom Line:

If you want to see latinas in underwear in terrible poses. This is your site

Protecting MinorsWe are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.