What Scott Walker Won't Say About the Difference Between Washington and Wisconsin

What Scott Walker Won't Say About the Difference Between Washington and Wisconsin

Gov. Scott Walker forgot one important difference between Wisconsin and Washington.

Photo by Pete Marovich/Getty Images

Should Washington be run more like Wisconsin? That's the case Gov. Scott Walker put forth in the Washington Post on Tuesday, crediting state lawmakers' ability to pull together:

Tough but prudent decisions put us back on track. We enacted long-term structural reforms that include allowing schools to bid out health insurance, local governments to stop overtime abuse and the state to collect reasonable contributions for health insurance and pensions — all of which saved millions. Instead of austerity, we chose reform.

At first, some legislative leaders balked at our plans. But we worked through their concerns and together we created legislation that not only passed but also produced positive results.

Advertisement

But Walker forgot to include the quintessential reason Washington hasn't passed such reforms—we have divided government at the federal level. In Wisconsin, legislative leaders may have "balked" at Walker's plans (or, say, defected to Illinois to prevent a quorum) but at the end of the day he had the advantage of a solidly red statehouse.

What does give Walker cachet when talking about the debt limit negotiations, however, is his ample experience with a very vocal minority party trying to prevent the executive from implementing its agenda. And while he chastised those quorum-breaking state Democrats back in 2011 for "shirking their responsibilities," we've yet to see his column deriding Sen. Ted Cruz for using the shutdown as a bargaining chip against Obamacare.

In the column, Walker cites a positive report by Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce—the state's business lobby—which has donated "almost exclusively" to Republican state lawmakers' campaigns over the past ten years. But Mary Burke, the Wisconsin businesswoman who recently announced she will challenge Walker's governorship in 2014, has been touting a different number: 45. "When you look at states like Minnesota, Indiana, and Ohio, you wonder, 'What the heck's going on?'" Burke says in her debut campaign video. "Because Wisconsin ranks 45th out of 50 states in projected job growth—sixth from the bottom."

For the record, Ohio and Indiana are both run by Republican governors, and they both enjoy large Republican majorities in both houses of their state legislatures. The Burke campaign should find a different metric for measuring Republican governors' efficacy, or, alternately, ask: what are Indiana and Ohio getting right that Wisconsin's getting wrong?

March 3 2015 1:39 PMThe “Most Pleasurable Portrayal of Libertarianism“ Bonus SegmentDavid, Emily, and John discuss what Parks and Recreation got right about government.Emily Bazelon, David Plotz, and John Dickerson