You all do realise that Hum is just the messenger and posts (usually weird) news stories he finds, right?

I posted this to see what people thought -- unfortunately there aren't many intelligent replies.

I too, do not see the white sheet allegedly laying on the ground, and do not understand why there would be one, even on a movie set.

They may have sent men to the moon, however, it's pretty clear that none of the video or photographs were taken there.

Any photo expert who is bold enough to tell you the truth will tell you this too. Even the Hassalblad camera engineer, Jan Lundgren, who developed the camera that the Apollo astronauts used, said that he could not explain the discrepancies and anomalies in the Apollo photos.

You seriously take those **** poor fuzzy blurry images as proof of anything ??? LOL

Those photos/images are as bad as fake UFO pics, you can see bugger all except pixels!

If better pictures could be taken at this time, don't you think they would have done it? There's always one snitch--If it were truly fake, a high up NASA personnel would have leaked it by now. Scientist all over the world have examined moon rocks--they would have been proven as fake. In 1969, we didn't have robots to just go fetch some rocks so that rules out that possibility. I'm not trying to start a flame war, rather bring up arguments.

Why do some people spend so much time trying to discredit something, someone would have already confirmed it was faked if it was fake, its very hard to keep a secret for 40 years. And, at the time the USSR would have jumped at any opportunity to discredit the US. Unless of course it is a global conspiracy. Maybe the moon isn't real?

If you were intelligent, you would have READ the reasons why they are very unlikely to be genuine, before posting.

You added no reasoning why you think the Moon images are real.

There's no need to prove their real, unless you're insane. There's a possibility to prove that they're fake, but no one has any actual, reasonable evidence of that being the case.

If you think there's some grand coverup involving thousands of people, multiple US Presidents, large-scale advanced technology and mounds of photo and video graphic proof, you might as well not believe anything is true.

Why do some people spend so much time trying to discredit something, someone would have already confirmed it was faked if it was fake, its very hard to keep a secret for 40 years. And, at the time the USSR would have jumped at any opportunity to discredit the US.

To be fair, the USSR had fields full of fake tanks and planes... a fake moon landing at the time would have been appropriate counter-propaganda.

Why do some people spend so much time trying to discredit something, someone would have already confirmed it was faked if it was fake, its very hard to keep a secret for 40 years.

Clearly the secret isn't being kept, with such websites.

No one is trying to discredit -- rather they are seeking the truth on a given event.

To be fair how can anyone discredit the photo at the end of the 1st page of this thread with no tracks from the lunar vehicle. Hope can it move without leaving tracks?

My only thought on that is that maybe the tire treads became so full of dust, that there is only a flat, dusty tire surface left, so that there is nothing to make an impression in the 'dirt'. Maybe the reduced gravity also helped to not leave deep marks.

Kind of like your would not leave actual prints from your feet, if your wore socks.