I'm building some DIY speaker cables and have been reading about resistance, capacitance and inductance; R and L being more significant than C.

I have used Electronics Work Bench to approximate a cable model (click attached thumbnail for image) and was hoping to get some comments about how valid or useful this approach is.

It seems to confirm much of what is said about capacitance affecting high frequency performance less than inductance and resistance i.e. when I change C not much happens but when I chance R and/or L the upper cut-off point can encroach on the audio band.

Note: The speaker impedance (Z) is a crude constant in this model as I'm not sure how to model the reactance of a typical speaker without actually drawing it in complete and given speakers vary quite a bit, maybe there is little point. Also, It's easy to increment Z and re-run the simulation to see the effect of changes in speaker impedance.

Instead of using a benign Sinusoid for the generator, try a Pulse/ Square wave and see what arrives at load end.

I used the function generator instrument. No real change from sine, square, triangle waves and for different voltages (1v to 10v) apart from the Inductors blew! EWB puts on a nice little animation to that effect.

I'll model some real world cables such as Goertz foils, Pear Anjou, Nordosts, DNM, Naim, Slinky Links to see how they perform for Z=4ohms (just to make it difficult).

Lumped cable models are essentially useless: for example, here is the comparison between a real, distributed model of a 320m cut and its lumped equivalent (when measured with a network analyzer, the resulting curve is identical to the simulated one [distributed, of course]).

This example is for a 100 ohm cable, but results are applicable to any type.