Karl Marx, a rabbinical class Jew, himself. So who would know better, stated the god of the Jews is money. He was right the Jewish term for money "Shekel" contains the term EL which is the Hebrew name for their god, El. Shek also means King in the sense of lord. Shekel really translates to "Lord God".

Capitalism is just the Torah applied to economics', pure capitalism is the slave trade, global monopolies, global money lending and debt slavery, and money oligarchs running a globalist plantation state of the (((rich))) and the serfs (Goyim the cattle) in a neo feudal system, as the Torah instructs the Jew to use usury banking like the Federal Reserve to take over the Goyim nations, steal all their lands and make them slaves to the Jewish owner class. Just like they did in the tale of the Jew, Joseph the first Rothschild, in Egypt. The Jews took the Egyptians over with Capitalism, by pawn broking the Egyptians into debt slavery with ancient banking usury and then stealing their actual properties in return, and turning them into debt slaves on their former lands, to the Jewish owners. Capitalism is a looting and slaving, conquest operation run by the Jews.

However the lesson was the Pharaoh stepped in and shut them down. Hence Communism eliminates all opposition to the theft and enslavement of the Goyim totally. Communism is the finalization of Capitalism. The transfer of wealth to one percent of Jewish Oligarchs, the destruction of the Gentile ruling and educated classes and land owners. And the transformation of the entire region into a open serfdom of farms and factories where the Goyim toil for their Jewish masters for starvation rations. And get marched off to slave camps to be worked to death to mine the Jewish Oligarchs their precious... golden shekel. Its openly documented the Jewish Banking Oligarchs were funding and directing the entire Communist movement and revolutions.

Note Tolkien wrote Lord of the Rings, in a back drop socially of a time when even Churchill was admitting the Jewish agenda with Marxism and Capitalism in the presses, Churchill would know he was on the dole of the Rothschild's, as the book by the Jewish writer Sir Martin Gilbert, "Churchill And The Jews" states . This was well known in England by most people.

What lesson did Tolkien put in his books...... An evil being in Mordor using the power of a evil mount [Zion] to create a golden ring the power of the gold of the Jewish Globalist Banking Oligarchs, that this evil being puts his evil essence [black Torah magic] into to bind the rulers of the nations [Goyim] to his evil Globalist regime. And one by one takes them down and destroys them by internal subversion and external warfare. To create a global slave state run by him.

What did Tolkien call the symbol of the power of the Ring in his book.......Golem.

The Golem is a being made from mud by a rabbi who is master of Kabala, black Jewish witchcraft and infused with the essence of the Jewish Rabbi by the power of the Jewish Alphabet which 22 letters is also the names of their god, which form the Torah, and then the Golem with this is turned into an animated servitor to do the Jews bidding.

This is the model for how Jews use Capitalism to take over Nations. Its the blue print right in their Torah.

As we can note right in their Torah how the Jews have turned money into a religion and god:

That a shekel signifies the price or estimation is evident from the following passages in the Word; in Moses:--

And all thy estimation shall be in the shekel of the holiness (Lev. 27:25).

And in another place:--

When a soul hath committed a trespass, and sinned in error from the holy things of Jehovah, he shall bring his guilt-offering to Jehovah, a ram without blemish out of the flock, according to thy estimation, in silver of shekels, after the shekel of holiness (Lev. 5:15).

From these passages it is plain that by a shekel is signified the price or estimation. It is said the shekel of holiness, because the price or estimation has regard to truth and good from the Lord; and truth and good from the Lord are the holy itself in the church. For this reason it is called the shekel of holiness in other places also (Exod. 30:24; Lev. 27:3; Num. 3:47, 50; 7:13, 19, 25, 31, 37, 43, 49, 55, 61, 67, 73; 18:16).

6] That the shekel denotes the price of what is holy, is clearly evident in Ezekiel, where the Holy Land and the Holy City are treated of. It is there said of the shekel:--

that here by shekel, and by pound, and by the numbers, are signified holy things, that is, good and truth, anyone can see; for the Holy Land, and the Holy City in it (or the New Jerusalem there treated of) is no other than the kingdom of the Lord, where neither shekel nor gerah nor pound, nor the counting by them, but the number itself, from its signification in the internal sense, determines the estimation or the price of what is good and what is true.

[7] In Moses:--

They shall give every man an expiation for his soul lest there should be a plague, half a shekel, after the shekel of holiness: the shekel is twenty gerahs and the half shekel for a therumah (an oblation) to Jehovah (Exod. 30:12, 13);

where ten gerahs, which are the half shekel, denote the remains which are from the Lord. Remains are goods and truths stored up with man, and these are signified by ten, (AC 576, 1738, 1906, 2284); and also that remains are goods and truths from the Lord stored up with man, (AC 1906, 2284). These therefore are called an oblation to Jehovah, and it is said that by them there shall be an expiation for the soul. The reason why it is so often said that the shekel was twenty gerahs, as in the passages quoted, and also in (Lev. 27:25; Num. 3:47; 18:16), is that the shekel which is twenty gerahs signifies the estimation of the good of remains. That twenty signifies the good of remains may be seen above, (AC 2280). On this account the shekel was likewise a weight, according to which the value both of gold and of silver was estimated (Gen. 24:22; Exod. 38:24; Ezek. 4:10; 45:12); the value of gold, because gold signifies good (AC 113, 1551, 1552); and of silver, because silver signifies truth (AC 1551, 2048). From all this it is now plain that by land of four hundred shekels of silver is signified the price of redemption by means of truth. It is called land because the subject is the spiritual church, which is reformed and regenerated by means of truth from the Lord (AC 2954). That by land is signified the church, (AC 662, 1066, 1067, 1262, 1733, 1850, 2117, 2118).

An outstanding post. That should explain a lot of things to people wondering about Capitalism. I personally think that if you have no Jews around, it would be plausible. But how can you have capitalism without Jews around. You can't. What people think of as promised capitalism does not really exist, or ever existed. It was just communism by the backdoor, the stage where the Jews amass the monetary wealth to move into the next stage.

The things the Goyim were allowed to buy by lending shekels, are taken back in the form of ancestral land, build and Ready inheritances, companies, or at the price of one's existence. Through the levegare of debt.

Infiltration of civilization only becomes possible with proto-Capitalism: BUYING your way at the top, and then consequently in politics. The values of vanity, wealth based in sheer exploitation rarther than social co-operation. Already have opened the gates of the master of exploitation. The Shekelstein.

If you are rich, you are not safe, and if you are poor, neither. If you are a Goy, you have 10 dollars or 100000000, it's in a Jewcy storage bank.

If capitalism existed without Jews, it would just be NS market economy, and called as such. Where one can get rich based on merit and work. Then it's like capitalism. Only without usury. And without kikes stealing your life at pension age. Or scamming your insurance.

Because how are Jews going to buy 10000000$ in diadems, fancy hats and Torah scrolls. Unless some Goyim do not give 6 billion a year for a hoax of lampshades?

The only reason we have anything is due to social ethical legislation that was brought about by Gentiles, the labour unions, the worker struggle minus Marxism and such. That put legal moral reforms on the Oligarchs and how it affected society. Otherwise the children would still be marched into the coal mines today. Studying the history of the rise of Capitalism in Italy during the renaissance to the current year over seven centuries. Its a destructive cycle. And only a fool would embrace it.

No mistake capitalism really arose out of the Protestant regions like Holland and England were everyone decided they wanted to be jews. And Holland the first major base was full of jewish bankers and merchants elites. Its all jewish. Even Adam Smith was on the pay role of the capitalist oligarchs. He was writing their propaganda.

Where the economy is a labour based one, with proper ethical considerations, no driving down the wages, and such. You get a prosperity based society. This can be viewed in Hitler's economic miracle. Capitalism is a looting and slaving, conquest operation by the jews and their Shabbos goyim into this which ruins it all into poverty.

Aryan societies were not wealth based societies, based on caste systems where the value of the individual was determined by their value to the market place. And thus a society based on wealth equalling social and political power and thus the right to rule. A society ruled by bankers and merchants.

Aryan society was ruled by a spiritual class, the Priest Aristocracy, with the class of merchants under them with the yeomen, the workers and such. The goal of life was spiritual. Spiritual advancement and ethical, noble behaviour conferred, status and power.

In the end we are going to have to advance to a moneyless society one way or another with the rise of technology and automation. This transition will be easier when we adjust our values to truth ones and not torah shekel worshipping.

Would all labor be automated or would some things be left for humans to do for possibly health reasons? Or is that unnecessary? Would we use energy as currency like The Powers of Hell do or would we even have that?

Would all labor be automated or would some things be left for humans to do for possibly health reasons? Or is that unnecessary? Would we use energy as currency like The Powers of Hell do or would we even have that?

It will take time and evolution to reach these levels. You don't snap fingers and here it is. The Gods are extremely far more advanced. We will go through many stages. And obstacles to reach there. But eventually, we will follow suit most hopefully.

However, I don't see a reason about people and how they enjoy 'automatation' of everything.

The point is to make STRONG beings. By having machines and other things do everything, and you doing nothing. Is actually a really fast way to rot a genetic blueprint. Everything in balance, is the thing. Laziness doesn't have to take a futuristic character. Most people are extremely lazy as it is. Maybe labor will be far more joyous and productive. But working is nothing evil. Working is actually, creative activity.

However, as Rabbi Marx says. The problem is that what workers produce, their creation. Is actually stolen by jews basically. So that is a deadly problem. Instead of the produced things being enjoyed by people.

If it goes worse on the pretext of tech, then what good is this species to live.

Thank you very much HC. I am wondering: Is there a limit to evolution and advancement? Is there a level where you don't advance anymore? Or are beings like Satan STILL advancing and always will (and us)?

Thank you very much HC. I am wondering: Is there a limit to evolution and advancement? Is there a level where you don't advance anymore? Or are beings like Satan STILL advancing and always will (and us)?

Only limits perceived and created by us, I would say. But it seems after some points in advancing, we advance in ways we may not quite understand now. Like very differently. As for example our way of spiritual advancing is strange and unknown to people who do not spiritually advance or even know about this, for example.

The money less society and tech and automation in some ways seems to me like a dystopia. Do you mean there is no medium of echange? Everything is given to a person?

And what happens at a stage of advancement for a civilization when everything is given to people, and drones magically drop the items from the sky, and nobody has to work because robots made it all happen and nobody even has to leave their house if they don't want to? Assuming the people are advanced like the gods spiritually then what?

Where did they meet their friends and lovers? It wasn't at work. Or the store. Or the gas station. What do they do in their free time? You know, when they've done their meditations and all that. They don't have to work. They have nowhere to go. Does everyone get high on pineal juice and go to concerts and make love? Don't people get bored in this case?

And without money what if someone made a painting for fun on the side and wants to get rid of it but be compensated for it?

And if all the people and the society are nearly perfect what is the point even of existing? What then makes them happy when there are no more improvements to make, when there is nothing to fix, or nowhere to go as far as advancing goes. Are the people happy to just exist in the same way my dog is happy every morning with his boring day?

And is there room in this society for a human element to replace computers and robots even if there is some loss of efficiency or money? Because sometimes a human element adds something more valuable than what the computer can do, or adds some x factor, some intangible benefit.

Lets be realistic here, everything is going towards automation because its cheaper and more dependable for owners. So that is already here and will keep coming. The old industrial age economic system is over. Just as new tech replaced the previous economic system before it. So too is new tech is replacing the current system. The question is will it end up as a welfare state or will we move forward into a new society.

With 3d printing as it is most people can make almost anything they need at home. Thus replacing the need for many existing industries to supply those needs. That is just one of the now existing and incoming technologies.

My common senses tells me people will still socialize even without being stuck in some meaningless slave job all day. Telsa never got paid for most of what he did either nor did Hitler. Find a persons talent in their chart and give them the training for it and they will do this daily which allows a better society and happier people. Instead of working to meet basic needs we can actually build a higher civilization faster. People don't work for money they work for fulfilment, money has gotten in the way of this. We can have family life, personal life, spiritual life and social life without having all our time sucked into a slave job for life.

Are you actually complaining about having a society were stuff does not breakdown and things work properly? And spiritual perfection depresses you or something....

HeilOdin666 wrote:

The money less society and tech and automation in some ways seems to me like a dystopia. Do you mean there is no medium of echange? Everything is given to a person?

And what happens at a stage of advancement for a civilization when everything is given to people, and drones magically drop the items from the sky, and nobody has to work because robots made it all happen and nobody even has to leave their house if they don't want to? Assuming the people are advanced like the gods spiritually then what?

Where did they meet their friends and lovers? It wasn't at work. Or the store. Or the gas station. What do they do in their free time? You know, when they've done their meditations and all that. They don't have to work. They have nowhere to go. Does everyone get high on pineal juice and go to concerts and make love? Don't people get bored in this case?

And without money what if someone made a painting for fun on the side and wants to get rid of it but be compensated for it?

And if all the people and the society are nearly perfect what is the point even of existing? What then makes them happy when there are no more improvements to make, when there is nothing to fix, or nowhere to go as far as advancing goes. Are the people happy to just exist in the same way my dog is happy every morning with his boring day?

And is there room in this society for a human element to replace computers and robots even if there is some loss of efficiency or money? Because sometimes a human element adds something more valuable than what the computer can do, or adds some x factor, some intangible benefit.

While we're on the subject of automation, HP Don (if you have time), I wanted to ask you what you thought of Ted Kaczynski? I disagree with his tactics and his extreme environmentalism and opposition to technology, but he seemed very intelligent and his manifesto did seem to understand how (((the system))) was harming humans. He seems a lot brighter than people give him credit for.

I guess the bombings could just be another false flag, though.

"There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph."-Dr. Joseph Goebbels

Thank you very much HC. I am wondering: Is there a limit to evolution and advancement? Is there a level where you don't advance anymore? Or are beings like Satan STILL advancing and always will (and us)?

Only limits perceived and created by us, I would say. But it seems after some points in advancing, we advance in ways we may not quite understand now. Like very differently. As for example our way of spiritual advancing is strange and unknown to people who do not spiritually advance or even know about this, for example.

Advancement is eternal.

I thought the same. I have to admit I have been guilty of limited thinking, in that "How much further could we advance?", at least technologically. Then I realise only 100 years ago, the sorcery we have today with the computer was not thought of either at all or not quite as how it is today. Before that, we might not have comprehended the telephone or the lightbulb or the steam engine or the bow and arrow or the metal-tipped spear or the pointy stone on a stick...

Now that I realise "necessity is the mother of invention", and that "thoughts become things", there must not be a limit. Satan is THE God of Gods, (and King of Kings, and Lord of Lords), but is still going more and more.

Next, from what I can gather, quantum computers are to happen. To give you an idea of how powerful they might be, (based on some maths I did before) at least theoretically - take any password/phrase that you have. Say, for argument's sake, it takes today's non-quantum supercomputers 100 years to crack that password successfully, they reckon it would take a QC less than an hour to crack the same password. One thing I read said QCs could be millions of times more powerful than today's supercomputers, and they've managed to do some quantum thingies in some sort of liquid stuff, which boggled my mind. The reason quantum bits - or qubits - could be so powerful is with binary (1s and 0s), there can be either only on or off, but with qubits, they can be on, off, or a 'superposition of on and off', meaning a virtual infinite number of between-states of on and off...

Then what would that say with the jew's microchip?!

When you say we could advance in very different ways, the further we climb - that looks very consistent with advancement thus far. How/why would it stop?! Then, of course, I think about the jew's idea of sci fi and the future.

The same year, researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory figured out how to make a seven-qubit machine using a drop of liquid.

Quanta, qubits, QCs can exploit the way the tiniest parts of existence work, which means they can store so much massively more amounts of data, and use less energy to do so... When the jew said "Human Race", I think it meant Humans vs the jew racing to that finish line...

While we're on the subject of automation, HP Don (if you have time), I wanted to ask you what you thought of Ted Kaczynski? I disagree with his tactics and his extreme environmentalism and opposition to technology, but he seemed very intelligent and his manifesto did seem to understand how (((the system))) was harming humans. He seems a lot brighter than people give him credit for.

I just don't want it to be that people live for technology and not tech living for humans. If done improperly the tech could be binding and that is what we are trying to eliminate. It could go wrong from terminator style to just oppressive in other ways. I want it to all be centered around humans and lifting them up to use this power.

Howevet I have received clarification from your post, and also in other ways on this. I was very tired when I wrote that so excuse if my post was weird lol. I feel reassured that if its US in charge of this transition all will be well. If it's not us it will be very bad, but it seems a demom may have guided me that it will be a blessing assuming JoS wins.

I've also had my point of attention drawn to the fact that NS is a form of government in which all decisions are based on the mindset of "how can we help people, uplift them, take care of them, advance them" etc.

So all tech advances and policy will be coming from that place under a NS government. So if something is lacking we can make arrangements to get it to people. If something is working against people, then we can change it or remove it.

If people want a human at a restaurant for atmosphere or a peronal touch we can have that. If we want robots for production we can have that. If we want a mix of both we can do that too. We can set it up whatever way we want to and that serves the best and makes people happy. It not all about "muh profits" anymore.

My common senses tells me people will still socialize even without being stuck in some meaningless slave job all day. Telsa never got paid for most of what he did either nor did Hitler. Find a persons talent in their chart and give them the training for it and they will do this daily which allows a better society and happier people. Instead of working to meet basic needs we can actually build a higher civilization faster. People don't work for money they work for fulfilment, money has gotten in the way of this. We can have family life, personal life, spiritual life and social life without having all our time sucked into a slave job for life.

I agree 100%. I'm one with an artist's soul. I've been doing music for years now and have never made a penny; I've spent quite a bit of money over the years more than anything. And I've still loved every minute of making music and I continue doing so to this day. Doing this as a "job" would be a dream come true...

"Thou shalt worship the Superman, the Elite of the Race, the Lord of all the kingdoms of the earth and the glory of them, and Him only shalt thou serve." -Adolf Hitler

Yes but people struggle to socialize now with their heads up their ass, I mean phones, all the time. Maybe short term tech helps improve, but at super advanced levels, even with good intentions, it may cut us off socially whether we intend to or not. There may be a nature to the beast. I still feel we can make tech work positively and it is a major blessing, but we must know the pitfalls to avoid them.