Early and effective HIV therapy may -- in a small fraction of patients -- lead to a so-called functional cure, French researchers reported.

Action Points

Early and effective HIV therapy may, in a small fraction of patients, lead to a so-called functional cure.

Point out that although the report is the second in several days of what appears to be curative early treatment for HIV, in general, experts do not recommend stopping HIV treatment.

Early and effective HIV therapy may – in a small fraction of patients -- lead to a so-called functional cure, French researchers reported.

Fourteen patients who were treated within the first 2 months of infection were later able to stop combination antiretroviral therapy without an HIV rebound, according to Asier Sáez-Cirión, PhD, of the Institut Pasteur in Paris, and colleagues in the so-called VISCONTI study.

While all 14 still have HIV, in most cases it can only be detected with ultrasensitive laboratory tests and is undetectable by standard methods, Sáez-Cirión and colleagues reported online in PLoS Pathogens.

But in all cases, the infection appears to be under control without the use of drugs – the definition of a functional cure, which unlike a "sterilizing" cure does not completely get rid of HIV.

The report is the second in several days of what appears to be curative early treatment for HIV.

Nonetheless, in general, stopping HIV treatment is not recommended, commented Michael Saag, MD, of the University of Alabama Birmingham.

"In my practice," he told MedPage Today, "I would start everyone with acute infection on antiretroviral therapy, but in general I would just continue that therapy and not stop."

Several studies of so-called treatment interruption have showed that for most people, stopping therapy leads to sharp and dangerous increases in HIV replication, Saag noted.

The difference in this group, the researchers suggested, is that they were treated very early, in what's called primary or acute infection, and spent between a year and 7.6 years on therapy, with a median of 36.5 months.

Their reasons for stopping, Sáez-Cirión told MedPage Today in an email, included a desire to take a vacation from therapy and participation in a treatment-interruption study.

The 10 men and four women have now been off therapy for between 4 and 9.6 years. Their plasma viral loads are below 40 copies of HIV RNA per milliliter in all but three cases, and below five copies in five patients.

The virus is conventionally regarded as "undetectable" if the plasma viral load is below 50 copies per milliliter, although so-called single-copy assays – only rarely used outside the lab – can detect smaller amounts of HIV.

What Sáez-Cirión and colleagues are calling "post-treatment controllers" are not common, they noted.

When they looked at the French database of HIV patients from 1997 to 2011, they found just 756 patients who were treated within 6 months of infection and who maintained therapy for at least a year.

Of those who had a detectable viral load before therapy and an undetectable one afterward, just 70 stopped treatment and had subsequent viral load measurements.

Kaplan-Meier estimates of that population suggested the probability of maintaining viral control after a year was 15.3%.

That means, Saag noted, that about 85% of patients treated early will still face viral rebound if they stop treatment.

Although the phenomenon may not have immediate clinical implications, he said, it's "proof of concept" that the immune system can control HIV in some circumstances.

It may also offer hope for a vaccine, he said. "It shows there is some immune response," he said, "that can be stimulated not just to control infection but to prevent infection if that part of the immune system can be primed and activated."

Indeed, the researchers argued that study of these patients and others like them could "open up new therapeutic perspectives" for people with HIV.

Among other things, they found that the immune systems of post-treatment controllers don't resemble those of "elite controllers" – the 1% of the HIV-positive population that appears to have a natural ability to control the virus.

The elite controllers tend to have protective HLA class I alleles, but the 14 patients tended to have HLA variants associated with a higher risk of HIV progression, they reported.

As well, elite controllers have large numbers of highly efficient HIV-specific CD8-positive T cells; the post-treatment controllers have "very weak" and in some cases barely detectable HIV-specific CD8 responses.

On the other hand, there's at least one important similarity: Both groups have small HIV "reservoirs" -- groups of infected cells that give rise to new virus, leading to viral rebound when therapy is stopped.

The finding suggests that "limiting the pool of infected cells is crucial for the successful control of viral replication in the absence of therapy," Sáez-Cirión and colleagues argued.

And, they concluded, early therapy, continued over a prolonged period, "likely played an important role in reducing the reservoirs."

That said, it remains "unclear" what factors distinguish the patients who achieved control from those who did not.

The study had support from the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis. The journal said the authors declared that no competing interests exist.

Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco and Dorothy Caputo, MA, BSN, RN, Nurse Planner

Accessibility Statement

At MedPage Today, we are committed to ensuring that individuals with disabilities can access all of the content offered by MedPage Today through our website and other properties. If you are having trouble accessing www.medpagetoday.com, MedPageToday's mobile apps, please email legal@ziffdavis.com for assistance. Please put "ADA Inquiry" in the subject line of your email.