The theory of intersectionality, in a highly condensed form, is this: There are different marginalized groups whose identities are not separate from one another but intersect within society to produce strata of cultural oppression.

I mention this because one thing that happens at a physical intersection is car crashes. And, thanks to transgender cyclist Dr. Rachel McKinnon’s recent attack on those who insist biological males have an advantage over biological females in women’s sports, we had a metaphorical pileup at one very fraught intersection.

McKinnon — who transitioned to a woman and subsequently won a women’s cycling title in October, according to TheBlaze — has been in the news this month after accusing former Olympian Sharron Davies of being “transphobic” and “sharing hate speech” because Davis believed transgender individuals ought not be allowed to compete in women’s sports.

Advertisement - story continues below

“I have nothing against anyone who wishes 2be transgender,” Davies tweeted March 1. “However I believe there is a fundamental difference between the binary sex u r born with & the gender u may identify as. To protect women’s sport those with a male sex advantage should not be able 2compete in women’s sport.”

I have nothing against anyone who wishes 2be transgender. However I believe there is a fundamental difference between the binary sex u r born with & the gender u may identify as. To protect women’s sport those with a male sex advantage should not be able 2compete in women’s sport

This remains true even after the Nov 2015 IOC policy making it easier for trans women to compete. No trans woman has won an elite world championship medal. The fear that trans women will suddenly ‘take over’ sport is irrational, which is the very definition of transphobia. (2/3)

McKinnon has also been critical of women’s tennis champion Martina Navratilova and British runner Paula Radcliffe, both of whom have said there should be rules regarding biological males competing in women’s sports. McKinnon decided, in a March 5 tweet, to go after all three — although, when it comes to intersectionality, the cyclist could have chosen a better metaphor.

Do you think biological males ought to be able to compete in women’s sports?

YesNo

Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

You’re logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.

1% (13 Votes)

99% (1046 Votes)

Advertisement - story continues below

“If Sharron Davies, Paula Radcliffe, or Martina Navratilova had said we need to keep black women out of sport to ‘protect it’ and the ‘integrity of women’s sport,'” McKinnon tweeted, “That would be obviously racist.”

Uhhhhhh. Dr. McKinnon, I agree with you overall, but it’s really inappropriate for you to invoke a racist trope to make that analogy. Our society has a long history of undermining and calling into question the femininity of black women specifically. Why would you add to that?

What!?! These comparisons are beyond offensive to black women everywhere! Stop comparing our struggles in this country with that transgenders. I’m floored by how out if touch some white people still remain.

“Black women aren’t a subspecies of women. We are not socialized as men. We do not go through puberty as men. We do not live as men. Our bodies are not male. Stop using us as props in your weak arguments. All it does is reveal your own racism,” one person responded, according to TheBlaze.

“Ah, the racism rampant amongst white trans rears its ugly head yet again. No. There is zero comparison b/w exclusion based on race, and sex-separation b/c of clear male advantage. Your position (would) be cleaner if you argued against sex-separation altogether,” another user said.

These were, of course, the posts referencing the intersectional car wreck at play here. The best response was probably this one, though:

More or less. McKinnon’s argument is somewhat more complex than just claiming that once a male transitions to a female they’re automatically the same as a woman, but the basic point is that anyone who disagrees is automatically a transphobe.

For more on how McKinnon’s line of thought works, you can check out the transgender activist’s YouTube channel, where McKinnon once published a series of “Trans 101” videos, including this gem, entitled, “Check Your Privilege and Feminist Standpoint Epistemology.”

Advertisement - story continues below

Of course, given that there’s — at best — no medical consensus to support the assumption that there’s no difference between a male-to-female transgender athlete and a biological female, the idea that there’s any equivalency between that situation and banning black athletes isn’t just a false equivalency, it’s a racist false equivalency.

McKinnon should have known better to make this juxtaposition — and thus deserves every bit of the whirlwind of negative attention that’s come as a result.

C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal for four years.

C. Douglas Golden is a writer who splits his time between the United States and Southeast Asia. Specializing in political commentary and world affairs, he's written for Conservative Tribune and The Western Journal for four years. Aside from politics, he enjoys spending time with his wife, literature (especially British comic novels and modern Japanese lit), indie rock, coffee, Formula One and football (of both American and world varieties).