I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be enough. Either way, a big +1! Thanks,HariOn Friday, January 24, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Robson wrote:

> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if we should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I will be doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase - and Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.> > Please vote> > [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop> >

Thanks David and Jarcec! The OraOop Connector will be a momentousaddition to the Apache Sqoop codebase.

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Hari Shreedharan<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> +1.>> I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be enough. Either way, a big +1!>>> Thanks,> Hari>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Robson wrote:>>> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if we should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I will be doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase - and Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.>>>> Please vote>>>> [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code>> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference>> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop>>>>>>

> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if we> should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I will be> doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase - and> Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.>> Please vote>> [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop>

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:06:10PM -0800, Kathleen Ting wrote:> +1> > Thanks David and Jarcec! The OraOop Connector will be a momentous> addition to the Apache Sqoop codebase.> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Hari Shreedharan> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > +1.> >> > I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be enough. Either way, a big +1!> >> >> > Thanks,> > Hari> >> >> > On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Robson wrote:> >> >> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if we should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I will be doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase - and Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.> >>> >> Please vote> >>> >> [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code> >> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference> >> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop> >>> >>> >> >

On 1/24/2014 6:18 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:> +1!>> Jarcec>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:06:10PM -0800, Kathleen Ting wrote:>> +1>>>> Thanks David and Jarcec! The OraOop Connector will be a momentous>> addition to the Apache Sqoop codebase.>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Hari Shreedharan>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> +1.>>>>>> I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be enough. Either way, a big +1!>>>>>>>>> Thanks,>>> Hari>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Robson wrote:>>>>>>> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if we should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I will be doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase - and Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.>>>>>>>> Please vote>>>>>>>> [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code>>>> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference>>>> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop>>>>>>>>>>>

> +1>> Best Regards,> Abhijeet>>> On 1/24/2014 6:18 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:>>> +1!>>>> Jarcec>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:06:10PM -0800, Kathleen Ting wrote:>>>>> +1>>>>>> Thanks David and Jarcec! The OraOop Connector will be a momentous>>> addition to the Apache Sqoop codebase.>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Hari Shreedharan>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>>>>>> +1.>>>>>>>> I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really>>>> just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be>>>> enough. Either way, a big +1!>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,>>>> Hari>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Robson wrote:>>>>>>>> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if>>>>> we should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I will be>>>>> doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase - and>>>>> Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.>>>>>>>>>> Please vote>>>>>>>>>> [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code>>>>> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference>>>>> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

-- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICENOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.

> +1>> Thanks> Venkat>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Abhijeet Gaikwad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote:>> > +1> >> > Best Regards,> > Abhijeet> >> >> > On 1/24/2014 6:18 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:> >> >> +1!> >>> >> Jarcec> >>> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:06:10PM -0800, Kathleen Ting wrote:> >>> >>> +1> >>>> >>> Thanks David and Jarcec! The OraOop Connector will be a momentous> >>> addition to the Apache Sqoop codebase.> >>>> >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Hari Shreedharan> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >>>> >>>> +1.> >>>>> >>>> I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really> >>>> just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should> be> >>>> enough. Either way, a big +1!> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Thanks,> >>>> Hari> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Robson wrote:> >>>>> >>>> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if> >>>>> we should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I> will be> >>>>> doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase -> and> >>>>> Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.> >>>>>> >>>>> Please vote> >>>>>> >>>>> [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code> >>>>> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference> >>>>> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> --> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately> and delete it from your system. Thank You.>

NEW: Monitor These Apps!

All projects made searchable here are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation.
Service operated by Sematext