According to two well-vetted sources with intimate knowledge of the CIA operations and events in Benghazi, the resignation of CIA Director David Petraeus is directly related to the testimony he was expected to provide before a closed-door hearing next week before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Sources close to the controversy, citing the need for anonymity due to their positions, stated that Barack Hussein Obama was aware of the CIA director’s indiscretions “long before” the November 6, 2012 elections, and knew about the FBI’s investigative findings weeks before the election, but “erected a firewall” to prevent any disclosure before November 6th.

“What I do know is that an integral part of that firewall involved having information on Petraeus that would potentially damage his career, legacy and marriage. A sort of political blackmail, if you will. What I don’t know, but suspect, is that Petraeus was placed in the unenviable but self-inflicted position of having to choose between providing truthful testimony under oath and having his professional and personal life destroyed while systematically being impeached due to this incident, or keeping quiet before the Senate Intelligence Committee,” stated one source.

A second intelligence source stated that “the announcement [of Petraeus’ resignation] was carefully timed. It was announced in a Friday afternoon news dump three days after the election, and days before the Senate Intelligence Committee was to hear his testimony, despite the President having knowledge of these events weeks ago. Friday’s announcement served two purposes; it kept controversy from emerging before the election, while allowing the administration to buy time regarding testimony by a federal official about CIA’s involvement in Benghazi.”

The resignation of David Petraeus is merely one, albeit a very high-profile one, of several coordinated moves to push any meaningful investigation into the events of Benghazi well into the future. “Obama and other high ranking officials learned many valuable lessons from Fast & Furious,” a fact agreed upon by both sources. Fast & Furious is the name given to the gun running operation from the U.S. into Mexico. “They understand that the longer they can delay and obstruct the truth, reassign key personnel with important information to positions and locations that hinder any meaningful investigation, the more the public interest wanes. As the public loses interest, it also takes the pressure off Congress from getting to the bottom of things.”

Both sources agreed that it is difficult to speculate whether Petraeus decided to extract himself from the leverage that the controversy had over him by the Obama regime on his terms, or whether his resignation was conducted solely by the terms of the Obama regime. Otherwise, both sources agreed that his resignation would buy the administration some valuable time, and the change in status of Petraeus as the active CIA director would also have an effect on the manner in which he is required to provide testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The change of status, from an active CIA official and government employee, to a citizen bound by far reaching confidentiality agreements, would change his ability to testify before the committee. “He can also lawyer-up,” added one source.

According to another CIA source, the resignation of Christopher Kubasik, president and CEO-elect of defense and aerospace company Lockheed Martin, announced on the same day as Petraeus, might have ties to the events at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. “There is a relationship between Lockheed Martin and the defense department, as well as the CIA, that ties into current events in Turkey and Syria. This is particularly relevant in the operation taking place in Benghazi and when investigation into where the ‘black-ops’ money went. Don’t forget, Congress appropriated money, at the behest of Obama, for humanitarian aid, not weapons.”

Like Petraeus, Kubasik cited an “inappropriate relationship” for his resignation. “The timing is beyond coincidental, and the operation much too big for this to be merely coincidental.”

Both intelligence sources interviewed for this report agree that there is an exceptional cover-up campaign taking place. “All roads lead to Benghazi, and this cover-up is exponentially bigger than anything we’ve seen in Watergate and the Iran-Contra Affair combined. The American people are being lied to at every turn, and the Obama administration has become emboldened by the election results and a disinterested media.”

Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.

Some how I just dont think we were twiddling our thumbs. What happened we were rob via voter fraud. Plain and simple. When you have a POSPOTUS that is heavy into technology, and has in's with the techno elitists, voting computers can be rigged to steal votes and no one is the wiser by it. IMO

Absolutely prevent them from taking it from us even if it means using force. It belongs to us, not them. They have no right to take from us anymore than we have the right to take it from them! At least until they attempt to do it illegally!!! TWIT!!!

I truly never imagined the possibility of a civil war in this day and age! However, with each passing day it becomes clearer and clearer that this may be the only way this crap ever gets straightened out!!! Such a shame.

Well there have been several firsts recently that I would never have dreamed of happening in my lifetime! I am still reeling from some of the current events. You have lived through them just like I have and they are shocking to my conscience! Unbelievable!!

I know, it is hard to believe in some respect. Although I have been talking about this for sometime with friends and associates, and they all seemed to think I was talking out of my you know what. Back in the 80's I divorced myself from the NRA because I felt that being a member of this organization would put my liberties and freedom at risk. So now here we are some 20+ years later and I'll be whipped if it is coming to that now.

There are many groups that have compromised their stances to exist and the NRA is one of them. They do not stand alone in this regard. We will see more and more of the traitors in times to come. They will take a softer stance to continue to be closer to the mainstream, or what they consider the mainstream to be. We will also see the continued degradation of our rights and liberties as the masses increase their demands on society and the government to support their lifestyles. At some future point in time, the bubble will burst! That is exactly where we are at present. It continues but for how long and when will it finally not support the takers any longer? Troubled times if you ask me!!