The sex of a chick is determined even before the egg is
fertilized.Each pair of chromosomes in the fertilized egg
has one chromosome from each parent.The father always
contributes a long sex chromosome (the Z chromosome) to the fertilized
egg.

Before the egg is fertilized, it has only those chromosomes from the
mother.If the mother contributes a long sex chromosome, Z,
to the unfertilized egg, the chick from that egg will be male because it will
have two long sex chromosomes after fertilization, since it always gets
a long sex chromosome from the father.If the mother
contributes a short sex chromosome to the unfertilized egg, then the chick will
be female because it will have one long and one short sex chromosome after
fertilization.So, in this way the egg can be thought of as
already having a sex (gender) even before it is fertilized.

On the basis of extensive research, it is now accepted as fact that female
chicks are equally probable as male chicks. There is no bias toward one
sex or the other. Given good incubation techniques, one should hatch equal
numbers of male and female chicks if a statistically valid (large enough) sample
of eggs is incubated. However, it is believed that female embryos are
preferentially killed by fluctuations in incubation conditions.

In order for rate of feathering to be an indicator of chick sex, the mothers
of the chicks have to have a slow feathering gene (see the table) while the
fathers have normal feathering or rapid feathering genes.A
cross between these males and females will give pullets with rapid feathering
and cockerels with slow feathering.This is a
sex-linked trait that can be a sex-indicating trait in the same way that
sex-linked barring can.

In the gene table in Part III the first listing is a set of sex-linked
genes. Some common sex-linked traits are Cuckoo barring, gold, silver,
slow feathering and dwarfism. Gold, s+, and silver, S, are
allelic,which means that they are found at the same locus (on the long, Z, sex
chromosome). In order to breed for a trait that will useful for
sexing day-old chicks, the trait must be visible in the hatchling. The
brown eye trait is not a good choice because chickens don't get their final eye
color until they reach sexual maturity.

To breed a trait that is present in male chicks and absent in female chicks,
the trait must be dominant and on the Z sex chromosome (sex-linked), the
female parent must have the trait and the male should be lacking the trait.
Please see the sex-linked genes in the table in Part III. Any of the
dominant sex-linked genes listed there can be exploited to give birds
that are sexable at a very young age. The silver gene, S, is often expoited in
varieties like Red Sex-Links for sexing day-old chicks. For example, we
might choose to cross a red Rhode Island Red male (s+, s+)
with a silver Delaware female (S, _) where this means that her long Z chromosome
has the silver gene, S, and her short W chromosome is lacking that locus and is
represented by an underscore or dash. The four possible gene combinations
of the parent genes from this cross are: (S, s+), (S, s+),
(s+,_), (s+,_). Here the dominant gene is
written first and any gene is written before the underscore.

In this example of the red male mated to the silver female, there are really
only two unique gene combinations since two of the four gene combinations are
identical to the other two. The 50% of the chicks that inherit the
gene combination, (S, s+), are silver males (male because they
inhereted two copies of the long Z sex chromosome) and are essentially white
birds with some possible coloration because silver can be a leaky gene.
The other half of the chicks that inherit the (s+,_) genes are red
females (female because she inherited the short W sex chromosome). So the
pullets are red and the males are primarily white (yellow down). It is
common that Delaware dams and Rhode Island Red sires are used in a cross like
this to obtain a Red Sex-Link. This cross is sometimes called Sil-Go-Link
for 'silver-gold-sex-link'. The silver gene used this way (the female
parent having the dominant gene and the male parent having the
recessive genes), will always give sons that have the dominant gene and
daughters that do not.

If the cross is carried out the other way, a silver male on a red female, all
the chicks will be essentially white if the male has two copies of the silver
gene (homozygous for silver). In this case it is not possible to determine
the sex of the day-old chicks by their color.

Any dominant sex-linked trait can be used in this way for the
purpose of sexing day-old chicks so long as that trait is visible in the
chicks. The slow feathering trait can be a good choice because it does not
change the basic color or pattern characteristics of the birds (see Part III
under Cuckoo barring) so that their appearance (phenotype) can be
maintained.

An auto-sexing breed is a breed in which the male and female day-old chicks
can be distinguished. Some physical characteristic must be observable that is
different in males than females. The important difference between a sex-link
hybrid and an auto-sexing breed is that the auto-sexing breed is a pure,
true-breeding strain and not a hybrid. Hybrids don't breed true in the sense
that phenotypes of male individuals are similar to each other and female
phenotypes are similar to each other.

An example of an auto-sexing breed is the Barred Plymouth Rock. In this
breed, the auto-sexing property arises from the dose effect that the barring
gene, B, exhibits. The B gene is on the Z choromosome so the male Barred Rocks
have two B genes while the females have one. The males and females hatch with
white spots on top of their heads with the male spot being larger and less
sharply defined. Also, the females tend to have darker shanks because the B gene
is an efficient inhibitor of shank color. These two traits, based on the B gene
dose effect, allow sexing of day-old chicks with a high accuracy rate.

Some genes are lethal.A dominant gene that is lethal when
a bird has only one of that gene (heterozygous for that gene) is immediately
taken out of the gene pool, since no bird survives with it.Some dominant genes are letal only when the bird has two copies of the
gene.The creeper gene, Cp and the ear tuft gene, Et, are
lethal to a chicken with two copies (homozygous).I am aware
of an exception to this in which someone claims to have a male with two ear tuft
genes that has survived.This should be considered to be a
rare exception.The short leg genes in other breeds are often
lethal.Some traits, like frizzleness and rumplessness are
known to reduce hatchability but are not explicitly lethal.

Most breeds have red ear lobes. The red color is due to the blood of
the bird and is visible because the skin of the ear lobes, comb and wattles has
a rich blood supply that is not masked in any way. These skin areas are so
highly vascularized that squeezing a comb between your thumb and forefinger will
more than likely squeeze out some of the birds blood onto your fingers.
Mosquito bites often leave a small amount of dried blood on the comb.
Breeds of the Mediterranean Class (Leghorn, Minorca and Spanish) have 'white'
ear lobes.

The white ear lobe is due to the purine pigment which is controlled by a
number of genes. The trait is said to be polygenic. The red ear lobe
is due to the lack of the genes that invoke the purine
pigmentation. Sometimes the white ear lobe can have a greenish or yellowish
tinge. The number and location of the genes responsible for white ear
lobes is not presently known.

Brown eggshell color is a complex trait and as many as 13 genes have been
proposed to account for the range in eggshell color. The white eggshell color is
due to an absence of blue and brown, and perhaps some modifying factors (genes),
since there are different shades of white. The blue eggshell gene, O, expresses
if it is present which is why it is considered to be dominant. The gene symbol
for the recessive, wild-type gene is o or o+. My
understanding at present is that the locations of the brown eggshell genes are
not known and it is not known how many brown modifying genes there are or where
they are in relationship to the genes of known locations.Brown may itself be just an array of white modifiers. There is a
recessive sex-linked gene, pr, that inhibits the expression of brown eggshell
genes and can be used to help remove the brown tint from white eggs, for
example.

The brown pigment, ooporphyrin, is deposited primarily on the outside of the
eggshell and is a chemical compound resulting from hemoglobin
metabolism.In fact, much of the brown pigment can be buffed
off with a common kitchen (plastic) scrubbing sponge and warm soapy
water.The blue eggshell pigment, oocyanin, is a byproduct of
bile formation and is present throughout the eggshell.

The eggshell color genes interact in the following way.The effect of the blue gene is dominant over white.The effect of the brown gene is dominant over white.When blue and brown genes are both present, both genes contribute to the
eggshell color making the eggs appear green.In this case,
the inside surface of the eggshell will be significantly less green and more
blue than the outside surface, which is where most of the brown pigment
is.

Since the blue and brown eggshell color genes should be at different
locations, we need at least two pairs of genes to describe the genotypes of the
blue, white, green and brown layers. For the purposes of this discussion, I use
the fictitious symbol, Br, to indicate a brown eggshell color gene. I represent
the complementary recessive gene that takes the place of Br when it is absent as
"br" (lack of brown gene). We can represent the genotype of a blue eggshell
layer as (O, O) with (br, br).Blue and white genes, (O, o)
with (br, br) also yields a blue egg, but perhaps a lighter
blue.The pair of eggshell color genes, (O, O) with (Br, Br),
are the genes for producing a green egg, (o, o) with (Br, Br) produces a brown
egg and (o, o) with (br, br) yields a white egg.Females
having one blue gene and one or more brown genes will lay eggs having a greenish
color. My personal experience with eggshell color makes me believe that this
genetics picture of eggshell color is oversimplified (there are certainly more
than one gene for brown eggshell color.In order to account
for the wide range of shades of brown eggs we see in our Sil-Go-Link line, there
must be a relatively large number of eggshell color modifying genes that are not
yet known. Most people accept a rule of thumb to the effect that a
daughter will lay eggs that are a color between that of the parent
lines.

To explore the genetics of eggshell color, let’s cross a green egg layer
(faux-Araucana or Easter Egg Chicken) with a white egg layer
(Leghorn).Here as before, I will use the fictitous symbol
"Br" to represent brown eggshell genes. The genes of the green egg layer are (O,
O) with (Br, Br) assuming the locations of the blue and brown genes are not the
same.The Leghorn is (o, o) with (br, br) for eggshell color
(white).In this example, the daughters will all have one
gene for blue eggshell color and one gene for brown. They will all be green egg
layers! My personal experience with eggshell color genetics leads me to believe
it is more complex than this. There certainly must be a number of brown eggshell
genes and once you have them, it is difficult to breed them out completely.

Comb type in chickens is due to two genes, the rose comb gene, R, and the pea
comb gene, P. These two genes are on different chromosomes.The lack of these genes is represented with lower-case letters, r and p.
More correctly stated, r and p (or r+ and p+ to indicate
they are the wild-type genes) are the genes that replace R and P when they are
not present.A chicken with a single comb is lacking both R
and P genes and so could be represented as (r, r) for rose comb and (p, p) for
pea comb.Some authors will combine this ‘notation’ and write
(rrpp) to represent the genes for single comb.I prefer the
first way of writing the genes for the purposes of this text.

A chicken with a rose comb will have one of the gene
combinations:(R, R) with (p, p), or (R, r) with (p,
p).A bird with a pea comb will have (r, r) with (P, P), or
(r, r) with (P, p).Since one copy of the rose or pea gene is
sufficient for that comb type, these genes can be thought of as
dominant.However, they act together to create the walnut
comb when both rose and pea comb genes are present.

Poultry with a walnut comb have at least one copy of both the rose comb gene
and the pea comb gene.The gene combinations that give walnut
comb are: (R, R) with (P, P), (R, r) with (P, P), (R, R) with (P, p) and (R, r)
with (P, p).

To explore the genetics of comb type, let’s cross a pea comb chicken, (r, r)
with (P, p), and a rose comb chicken, (R, r) with (p, p).Because two genes on different chromosomes are involved, there is more
bookkeeping than if there were only one gene involved, but the principle is the
same and no more difficult.We first have to consider the
combinations of the rose comb genes of the two parents, then the combinations of
the pea comb genes of the two parents.Then we realize that
each of the rose comb combinations can occur with each of the pea comb
combinations.In the end there are 16 combinations in
all.

The four possible combinations for the rose comb genes from the two parents
are: (R, r), (R, r), (r, r) and (r, r).The four combinations
for the pea comb genes from the two parents are: (P, p), (P, p), (p, p) and (p,
p).Since each of the four rose comb combinations can occur
with any of the pea comb combinations, we now have to consider each of the rose
comb combinations with each of the pea comb combinations (16).

The figure above shows how to make a helpful drawing.Make a list (column) of the four rose comb gene combinations on one side
and the pea comb genes on the other side.The combinations of
the first rose comb gene pair with all the pea comb gene pairs is shown in the
figure by the connecting arrows.Considering the (A, a) of
the drawing to be (R, r), the possible combinations of the first rose comb gene
pair with the pea comb gene pairs are: (R, r) with (P, p) twice [we get this
combination twice], and (R, r) with (p, p) twice.The second
rose comb gene pair with the pea comb genes gives the same combinations: (R, r)
with (P, p) twice and (R, r) with (p, p) twice.The third
rose comb gene pair with the pea comb gene pairs gives:(r,
r) with (P, p) twice and (r, r) with (p, p) twice.The last
rose comb gene pair with the pea comb gene pairs gives the same: (r, r) with (P,
p) twice and (r, r) with (p, p) twice.

So, of the 16 possibilities, four of them are (R, r) with (P, p) and is
walnut comb, four are (R, r) with (p, p) and is rose comb, four are (r, r) with
(P, p) and is pea comb, and four are (r, r) with (p, p) which is single
comb.We have four out of 16 chances (25% chance) to get a
walnut comb from this cross, four out of 16 chances to get rose comb, four out
of 16 chances to get pea comb and four out of 16 chances to get single comb.

The shank/feet color is controlled by genes that affect the skin at different
depths.The visible color is due to the combined effect of
the different colors of the dermis and the epidermis.So, the
shank/feet colors are a combination of upper skin and deeper skin
pigmentations.The following table gives the shank/feet
colors that result from the major gene combinations (the bird has two copies of
each gene). It is important to remember that other genes can modify shank and
foot color. For example, the sex-linked barring gene, B, is a potent inhibitor
of dermal melanin. The Barred Plymouth Rocks, for example, would not
have light shanks and feet if it were not for the fact that they have sex-linked
barring. The female Barred Rocks tend to have darker shanks due to the dose
effect of the barring gene. The following table is intended as a guide but
should not be considered to be absolute, since (as mentioned) other genes, such
as sex-linked barring, can modify shank/foot color.

The hypermelanic condition of some breeds, such as the Silkie breed, is due
to a pigment cell activator, which was named by F. Hutt as "fibromelanosis" to
emphasize the fact that the gene causes pigmentation of connective tissue. The
inheritance of the dark skin phenotype involves the fibromelanosis gene, Fm, as
well as dermal melanin inhibitors, such as the sex-linked Id dermal melanin
inhibiting mutation. The fowl with Fm and wild-type dermal melanin,
id+, will have darkly pigmented skin and connective tissue. The
combination of Fm and Id gives a bird that has little or no observable skin
pigmentation. There are other dermal melanin inhibitors that may have an
influence on the degree of melanization due to Fm (or the degree of expression
of Fm). Some genes influencing plumage color have an effect on dermal melanin,
such as the E-locus alleles, which may influence the expression of Fm. However,
fibromelanotic Silkies exist with black, white, blue and partridge patterns.

The genetics of feather color and patterns is an active topic of
poultry science research.Much of the work that was done
prior to the late 1980s is now considered out of date.Because a number of genes interact to determine feather colors and
patterns, it might seem to be too involved for the average
enthusiast.I don’t believe that this is the case, however,
the topic of feather color and patterns may be beyond the interest and
motivation of some enthusiasts.

White is actually all the colors combined and black is the lack
of reflection of light in the visible range, so one might argue that black and
white are not really ‘colors’ technically.However, if we
count black and white as colors, chickens have only three basic colors: black,
white and red (gold).

The colors of chickens are achieved by diluting and enhancing or
masking black and red (gold).For example, Rhode Island Reds
have the gold gene with the dominant mahogany (red enhancing) gene.A blue chicken is a black bird that has the blue gene which dilutes
black.Two copies of the blue gene give a splash
effect.A white chicken can be achieved in a number of ways
by inhibiting black and red pigmentation with combinations of genes (dominant
white, recessive white, silver, Columbian, Cuckoo barring).

Some perceived colors of feathers are due to the structure of
the feather and not any pigmentation.The purple and the
‘beetle’ green sheen that can be seen in some poultry is due to the way the
feather structure reflects light rather than the presence of a
pigment.

First, we need to define a couple of terms. In poultry there are
primary and secondary color patterns. Perhaps it is better to define secondary
patterns first. A secondary pattern is a pattern that appears on individual
feathers. These are patterns like single and double lace, mottle, and so on.
Primary patterns are color patterns that involve the entire body of the bird. An
example is the silver Columbian pattern. In the Columbian bird, black is
restricted to the hackles, wing bow and tail. The silver Columbian is a white
bird with some black in the neck, wing and tail areas. Because this pattern is
not manifest on individual feathers, it is a primary pattern.

To ‘construct’ a chicken having a particular color scheme, one begins with
the ‘background’ or the E-locus gene(s).The other color and
(secondary) pattern genes essentially modify this ‘background’.Please refer to the table at the end and the pattern table below to see
the choices and comments (other E-genes have been proposed but they are not yet
well accepted). Some of these are: E, extended black or nigrum; ER,
birchen; eWh, dominant wheaten; e+, wild type; brown,
eb; speckled, es; buttercup, ebc; and
ey, recessive wheaten.These genes cause
recognizable chick down color and influence the adult feather color, sometimes
male and female feather colors are influenced differently.For photographs of chicks with an assortment of E-genes the interested
reader is directed to Poultry Breeding and Genetics, R.D. Crawford, ed.,
Elsevier, 1990 pages 115-117.

As an elementary exercise, let’s ‘build’ a white
chicken.We can start with wild-type background,
e+, and require our bird to have two copies of this gene.We can suppress the red in the chicken by adding the silver gene, S,
which has the effect of changing red to white.Black is
suppressed (changed to white) by the dominant white gene, I, however this gene
is ‘leaky’ (see the table for comments) and allows black specks
through.A good ‘helper’ gene in this situation is the
Columbian gene, Co, since it is a restrictor of black.Although this set of genes is not the only set that will yield a white
chicken, it is one of the ways a white chicken can be obtained.

Feather color genes often display a ‘dosing’ effect: “Two genes
are stronger than one.”For example, since the locus of the
sex-linked barring gene is on the Z sex chromosome, females that have Cuckoo or
sex-linked barring (the barring that Barred Rocks have) can have only one
barring gene and have barring that is less well defined than the barring of
males that have two barring genes.Also, Sil-Go-Link
males that have only one silver gene (silver inhibits red) often have some red
color on their wings.So, in the Sil-Go-Link male, the one
silver gene does not completely inhibit the red pigment.The
silver gene is dominant but still some red is visible when only one silver gene
is present.This 'dose effect' in which two genes for a trait
reinforce or strengthen the expression of a trait is common in
poultry.

New research has indicated that several major patterns in
chickens are not due to independent genes as previous believed.The single lace, double lace, autosomal barring (horizontal penciling)
and spangling are now thought to be due to interactions with the Pg gene
(pattern gene).For a review of the original literature, see
W.C. Carefoot in Crawford’s volume.Single lace pattern can
be obtained with the genes: Ml (melanotic), Pg (pattern gene) and Co (Columbian)
on either eb, ey or eWh background genes.
Double lace pattern is obtained from the single lace pattern by removing the Co
gene.Spangling is obtained with Db (dark brown), Ml
(melanotic), Pg (pattern gene) on either the E or eb
background.Penciling is obtained with the Pg gene on the
eb or e+ background. Autosomal barring (sometimes called
horizontal penciling) is obtained with the Db and Pg genes.The table below, originally constructed by Brian Reeder, is intended to
serve as a guide to the patterns seen in chicken plumage.A
similar table is found in Poultry Breeding and Genetics, R.D. Crawford,
ed., Table 5.3, page 127.

The genetic basis of eye color has not been extensively studied as have other
aspects of phenotype. However, some things are accurately known. First of all,
the wild-type eye is characterized by the Light Brown Leghorn. Eye color is a
result of pigmentation of a number of structures within the eye (iris, retina,
uveal tract, ciliary).

The bay-color eye (various shades of reddish brown) is due to carotenoid
pigments and the blood supply of the iris. Brown eyes are increasingly melanized
with the darkest eye color due to the fibromelanotic gene characterized by heavy
eumelanin deposits throughout the eye. Little is known about pearl eye and Smyth
has speculated that it has the same eumelanin distribution as the bay but
without the carotenoids.

Eye color is modified by a number of genes that are known to be associated
with shank and plumage color. The sex-linked dermal melanin genes,
id+ and idM enhance dermal shank and eye pigmentation. The
inhibitor of shank dermal melanin, Id, also inhibits eye pigmentation. Smyth
hypothesized that the idM gene together with extended black, E, is
responsible for dark brown eyes. idM also darkens the eye on the
e+ background.

A dominant sex-linked inhibitor of eye pigmentation is known, Br. This trait
is not useful for developing sexable day-old chicks because chickens do not get
their final eye color until they reach sexual maturity.

In the absence of other melanin inhibitors, the E-locus alleles, E (extended
black) and ER, birchen, result in a brownish eye with the E allele
making the darker eye. Sex-linked barring, B, and eumelanin inhibitors at the
E-locus, like eWh have an effect on eye color. Recessive white seems
to have no effect on eye color and dominant white, I, has a strong ability to
inhibit eye pigmentation. The genetics of pearl are not known, however, it is
known that the white skin gene, W, is not the genetic basis of pearl eye, since
Cornish have yellow skin and can also have pearl eye.

Virtually everyone who hatches their own baby chicks wants to know what
the chick down color tells them about the genes of that individual chick. This
section is an effort to give some guidance in this direction.

Some Basic Chick Down Color Genetics

Chick Down Genotype

Phenotypic Remarks

E, Extended Black

basically black down. Variation includes gray and cream bellies. The
cream can invade the head and face. Often Australorps have cream in their
faces and heads although the adults are standard black color. Sex-linked
barring puts the cream head spot on the black down. Recessive mottling
(mo) makes these chicks look like penguins

e^Wh, Dominant Wheaten

Without columbian (Co) Wheaten down is a light cream for both
sex-linked silver and gold. One cannot distinguish silver from gold with
any accuracy on dominant wheaten. Heterozygotes can have varying amounts
of striping. Some New Hamps have light reddish stripes on their backs at
hatch. This may be due to heterozygousity or some other modifiers in these
lines. With Co wheaten downs are easily sexable. There is a high degree of
difference between silver and gold wheaten down when columbian is present.
This is why commercial white-tailed reds have dominant wheaten and
columbian.

e+, Wild-type

The dark eye stripe is characteristic of wild-type. The wild-type is
often referred to as the 'chipmunk' look. The buff color of the face and
back stripes are affected by sex-linked silver and gold. You can easily
tell Silver Duckwing chicks from Light Brown Leghorns, but you tend to
have trouble in crosses, involving Ss heterozygotes, so there are probably
modifiers that affect the gold color of the pure line chicks.

eb, Brown

Can range from a solid dark mink brown to light brown with stripes.
The most accurate typing for eb is that they have brown heads
with no stripes on the head like ebc.

ebc, Buttercup

more yellow than e+. This dilution may be due to
ebc or Db that seems to be in all the crosses and pictures
involving this allele. Adult females are like eb females and do not have
salmon breasts.

ey, Recessive Wheaten

Sometimes pictured as being yellow but more brown than e^Wh. Both are
said to be cream in color. Recessive wheatens are often called dark
wheatens because the adult females have more stippling on their backs than
dominant wheaten females usually have.

eb,Co

Chicks having sex-linked silver in addition to the above genes are
cream colored with varying amounts of gray on their backs. Their backs can
be nearly black. Sex-linked gold chicks show buff on their flanks and
faces and cream bellies with the same varying amount of gray on their
backs. The less gray the more buff on the backs of sex-linked gold chicks.

eb, Co, Db

Mostly light (yellow) body with brown head and back stripe. Buff
breeds may have wheaten, Co, and Db.

Some additional genes that affect chick down color are: Dominant and
recessive white with extended black at the E-locus gives yellow chick down. If
black spots leak through it is usually because the chick is heterozygous for
dominant white. Dark prown, Db, makes the black down of extended black to be a
reddish brown. Blue or grey chicks can be extended black and Bl (blue)
heterozygotes. These chicks can also look black. Chicks that are homozygous for
recessive lavender are blue / grey.

It is fun to consider the genetic make up of some popular breeds.From what we know at this point about poultry genetics, we can make some
judgments about the genes that birds have to have in order to look the way they
do.

Let’s consider Rhode Island Red as an example.With
respect to feather color, the Rhode Island Red (RIR) has gold (on the sex
chromosome), s+ (sometimes called G), and the mahogany (red
enhancing) gene, Mh (see the tables below).A Rhode Island
Red without any black in her hackle or tail may have a black suppressing gene
such as dominant white, I, and Columbian, Co, serves as an additional black
suppressing influence.She will have no black extending
genes, such as nigrum, which would change her to a black bird.Rhode Island Reds come in both single and rose comb types so she may have
at least one copy of the rose comb gene.The single comb RIRs
have neither the pea comb nor rose comb genes.RIRs have
yellow skin, shanks and feet, which requires two copies each of the w, Id,
e+ genes.RIRs can have either one or two genes
(hetero- or homozygous) for eggshell color giving the brown egg.

White Leghorns are white chickens that lay white eggs.The
white could be achieved in a number of ways.The task at hand
is to effectively inhibit both black and red.We construct a
Leghorn by having two dominant white genes, I, which are black inhibitors, but
the dominant white gene allows some black flecks through (see the table at
the end) and needs help.Sex-linked barring, B, acts as a
black inhibitor in white birds and is used as such in Leghorns.The red inhibitors in Leghorns are the silver gene, S and birchen gene,
ER, or nigrum, E.To get the single comb, the
Leghorn has (r, r) and (p, p) for comb genes and she needs (o, o) for eggshell
color genes for the white eggs.The Leghorn has yellow skin,
shanks and feet which requires two copies each of the w, Id, e+
genes.

Below is a table of partial genotypes for breeds of common interest. There
may be other genotypes and so I do not claim that any given breed must be
exactly the genotype specified. If a gene does not appear in the table, it is
intended that wild-type be assumed although sometimes wild-type genes are listed
for emphasis. I continue to collect information to update this table....

Partial Genotypes of Breeds of Common Interest

Breed

Autosomal Genes

Sex-Linked Genes

Comments

Australorp, Black

W/W, E/E, co+/co+,
db+/db+, (Ml/Ml),
i+/i+,(Pg)

S, Id

Evidence of unknown black enhancers and the pattern gene have been
observed in Black Australorps.

Silver Spangled Hamburg

ER/ER, Co/Co, Db/Db, Ml/Ml,
pg+/pg+

S, id+

The combination of dark brown and melanotic may be responsible for the
white undercolor.

Silver Laced Wyandotte

eb/eb, Co/Co, db+/db+,
Ml/Ml, Pg/Pg

S,Id

Yellow legged blacks are usually based on the eb E-locus
allele.

New Hampshire

eWh/eWh, Co/Co, Mh/Mh, w/w

s+, Id

With polygenes for red ear lobe and brown eggshell color. A primary
difference between New Hampshire and Rhode Island Red is the wheaten
allele at the E locus in the New Hamps.

Rhode Island Red

ey/ey, Co/Co, Mh/Mh, w/w, Db?

s+, Id

With polygenes for red ear lobe and brown eggshell color.

Barred Plymouth Rock

E/E, Co/Co, w/w

K, S, B, Id

With polygenes for red ear lobe and brown eggshell color. The slow
feathering gene, K, is believed to aid in obtaining a cleaner barring.
Barred Rocks have yellow shanks because of the dermal melanin inhibiting
property of Cuckoo barring. Without this, the breed would have near black
shanks with yellow soles.

White Leghorn

Homozygous for either E, ER or e+, I/I, w/w,
o/o

B, S, Id

Lines of Leghorns have been found with different alleles at the E
locus.

Delaware

eb/eb, Co/Co, w/w

B, S, Id

With polygenes for red ear lobe and brown eggshell color. Delawares
have Barred Rock and New Hampshire genetics.