We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

The 22-cent (or so) gap is based on an unsophisticated comparison of all women in the workforce with all men in the workforce. A waitress at the greasy spoon in Paris, Illinois, is in the “female” pool, being compared with Bill Gates of Xanadu 2.0, in the “male” pool.

The Glassdoor study found that when appropriate comparators were used — that is, men and women in the same job titles, same age groups, working for the same employers and in the same parts of the country — the “21-cent” penalty for being female decreased substantially. There is still a gap, but when apples are compared with apples, women earn about 94.6 cents for every dollar that men earn.

The Glassdoor survey was based on compensation information provided by users of Glassdoor, who are job-hunting online. Thus, the Glassdoor population is generally more affluent than the population on which government surveys are based. However, when comparing “all women” with “all men,” the Glassdoor gap was almost the same as the government’s gap: Glassdoor found a 22-cent pay gap before it began controlling for other variables.

Of course, there shouldn’t be any gap at all, but a gap of 5.4 cents is a lot better than 21 cents and may be something we can fix without imposing drastic legislative and regulatory requirements on employers.

YouTube clip from The Bill Dana Show (1963), with Bill Dana, Don Adams, and Sheldon Leonard.

Compare jurisdictions: Employment & Labor: International

“I enjoy the CLANZ newsstand and find it highly relevant to my job. I definitely have forwarded various articles to my colleagues on occasion where there is a point of general interest, particularly employment or IT law. I really appreciate the service, it's a quick way for me to keep up to date in a way I wouldn't otherwise have time to.”