Another Smoking Gun? Now CNN Jumps the Gun: On 911 CNN Announced WTC 7 "Has Either Collapsed or is Collapsing" Over an Hour Before it Fell

Chris | Information LiberationIn an amazing redux, new video has been unearthed of a CNN report on the day of 911 in which a CNN anchor announces they have received word that WTC 7 is on fire and "has either collapsed or is collapsing." The problem with this is that WTC 7 is clearly visible behind the anchor.

This report was carried at "about 4:15 eastern daylight time" (according to the anchor), over an hour before the building actually collapsed at 5:20. Who told them the WTC 7 building "has either collapsed or is collapsing."? Keep in mind he did not say it was going to collapse, he said it either had or was in the process of doing so. The anchor says is "we are getting information now", who is giving him this information? If you pay close attention you can see after the anchor announces this he turns around and sees the building as clear as day still standing, he then proceeds to backtrack on the initial information which informed him clearly the building "has either collapsed or is collapsing."

In order to understand the full significance of this video it needs to be put in context.

Firstly, a poll was conducted in 2006 which showed 42% of Americans were unaware a third building, WTC 7, collapsed on 911(PDF). Considering how many thousands of times the twin towers were shown collapsing on television, that in itself is extremely significant. There is, of course, a reason 42% of Americans do not know the story of WTC 7. If you watch the video below you will find out.

Secondly, there is smoking gun video of the owner of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, admitting on a PBS documentary he ordered the building "Pulled" which is an industry term for demolished.

Larry Silverstein made billions off the collapse of the building as reported here.

You’ve got to be lucky to make $4 Billion killing on a 6-month investment of $124 Million.

Larry Silverstein is the New York property tycoon who purchased the entire WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11 attacks. That was the first time in its 33-year history the complex had EVER changed ownership.

Mr. Silverstein’s first order of business as the new owner was to change the company responsible for the security of the complex. The new security company he hired was Securacom (now Stratasec). George W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was on its board of directors, and Marvin’s cousin, Wirt Walker III, was its CEO. According to public records, not only did Securacom provide electronic security for the World Trade Center, it also covered Dulles International Airport and United Airlines — two key players in the 9/11 attacks.

I .. I went down to the scene and we set up a headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna' to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit, got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.

This is just a small sampling of the evidence for those who want to know the truth of what happened that day. For those who wish to avoid the truth I leave you with this quote to ponder...

"People avoid the truth because the first bit of truth uttered and lived would draw more truth into action and so on indefinitely, and this would rip most people right off the customary tracks of their lives. But people, basically, know what is true and what is not, even if they so often render help to the lie. They support the lie because the lie has become a crutch without which life would not be possible. Therefor, in common human intercourse, the truth, and not the lie, is suspected as being phony." - Wilhelm Reich, "The Murder of Christ"

As it happened I knew that it very suspicious.Especially that the the so-caleed hijacked were not noticed by Norad. Later Prof. Stevens convinced me that it was an inside job. The debris came from inside the buildings: this is not possible because a plane takes the debris with it to inside of the building!
Planes don't pulverize concrete; the fine dust falling on cars,etc, is caused by huge explosions. Even the designer said that these planes couldn't bring these buildings. Newton's Laws and F=MxA moved the buildings. You need these Laws in physics to move anything, even to drink your cup of coffee.
The debris= evidence of the crime committed, was removed quickly and shipped to China they say. I don't believe the 'official' story of the Federal Commission. Too many questions are unanswered. Regards,Joop.

It is amazing that we are the 1's called crazy even after people watch all the evidence and cover-up of 9/11. America is under attack but its our government . How are they gonna de-bunk all this video evidence????? Wake up people !!!!!!!! Steel buildings dont fall from fire.....fema in nyc the night before......hole in pentagon 2 small....BBC and CNN reported that building 7 fell or was about 2 before it fell is just amazing evidence that some1 knew ...ect......ect........ect........Iran soon if we dont stop this power monger !!!!

The real question, the one that is not asked nearly often enough, is this: What is to be done about this? We're at a point now where these web sites are merely "speaking to the quoir" and not accomplishing much. We know that demonstrations accomplish nothing when held in "free speech zones" and "freedom cages."
One thing I've begun doing is burning some copies of 911 videos for people who are unfamiliar with the truth. I fear that simply getting the word out, however, is not nearly enough.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for the purposes of news reporting, education, research, comment, and criticism, which constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the DMCA and other applicable intellectual property laws. It is our policy to remove material from public view that we believe in good faith to be copyrighted material that has been illegally copied and distributed by any of our members or users.