Well proofs of the birth of Christ is not just from the Bible. History proves it if you study it carefully. Many first and second century Historians who were anti Christian have written about Christ. Some of them are Phlegon, Josephus and Tacitus. The entire dating method of BC(Before Christ) and AD(Anno Domini meaning the year of our Lord) wouldn’t have been there if Christ did not live during that time. We possibly cannot be wrong with our measuring of time. And BC and AD are not propagated or even given a mention in the Bible, but is only present in history.

I don't know about Phlegon or Tacitus, but we know the ownership records of Josephus' manuscripts: after he died, they were owned by Christians, and almost all the mentions of Jesus were not written by Josephus.

They spoke about a person who could have been the Jesus of the Gospels. That he's the son of God, it's a matter of faith. And concerning the dating system...................better not to tell you how the Greeks and the Romans counted.

One thing I'll never understand in many of the thousands of quotes on FSTDT and for which this is a prime example: Do these people not understand that it's 2008 and that you can actually fact-check their claims without even leaving your chair? It's not the 1960s anymore when you actually had to go to a library, or the middle ages when you had to be priviledged to access information.

Listen, "Wer", it's 2008 - if you claim something so abysmally stupid or wrong like you did in that post, people can and will find out in less than a minute, so read up about Josephus or Dionysius Exiguus first before you make any grand statements. Because you will only look like a pathetic retard to anyone with half a brain cell who knows how to use Google.

The entire dating method of BC(Before Christ) and AD(Anno Domini meaning the year of our Lord) wouldn’t have been there if Christ did not live during that time

Then why did that dating system have to be created years, if not centuries after the supposed death of your supposed "christ"

We possibly cannot be wrong with our measuring of time

We can if we're going to set completely arbitrary dates for
A) The supposed "creation" of the world.
B)The supposed birth of a "divine" being.
C)The supposed death of the aforementioned "divine" being.

Since all of these events have never been chronicled by any eyewitness (or even credible) sources and the placement of these events in the timeline have varied with religious ideology and interpretation it can be inferred that yes, our mesuring of time based off of supposed and quite likely non-existant events can be wrong.