Tiger2 is a sad sad story. It is not even fun to joke about this legend tank that in the game is a big LOL. I admint that whenever i go against a heavys in a medium (i am a med pkayer) i always chose the tiger2

unfortunately I have to grind thru the even shittier Tiger I (P) and the Tiger II now. It will wreck my WN8 completely probably. My WN8 was on a good rise, doing 1300 average the last month while grinding tanks in 75% crews with no skills (except the odd female commander). At least I wont get focused by arty if I turn red, lol.

unfortunately I have to grind thru the even shittier Tiger I (P) and the Tiger II now. It will wreck my WN8 completely probably. My WN8 was on a good rise, doing 1300 average the last month while grinding tanks in 75% crews with no skills (except the odd female commander). At least I wont get focused by arty if I turn red, lol.

Uninstall your mods. Honestly, it is much more fun to play without them.

As for the Tiger II, the E75 is great. So you have something to look forward to

Do the Devs even get to hear about complaints in the EU forum, or is this just for people to cool down?

I assume they're all Russians and wont hear any complaints from this forum.

Mostly cooling down. The staff has stated that they do make reports about game balancing and whatnot based on what's written in the forums. That is probably true, but whether they matter (or actually are read in the first place) I kind of doubt. Just a feeling you get when you observe the staff in action. Nothing to do with the boots on the ground, but it reeks of mismanagement when Wargaming manages to communicate a global issue rather well (the personal missions-Halloween bugs) - but largely chose to ignore the chat/contacts list issues that is still intermittently plaguing the game.

But those shots are all from higher tier tanks. IS 4, T-10 and a Pz VIII. Not saying that the Tiger II is great but not sure that those are fair examples.

Tiger II cheecks and mantlet are supposed to bounce/ricochet anything at this angle. That's what pisses me off. Or why would you play an HT in the first place? I have to carefully aim in my shots to the copolas and these T10 guys can pen the Tiger II anywhere even if placed perfectly? There's already the weakspots anyway, coppola front of turret (outside mantlet), lower (and upper) plate.

Tiger II cheecks and mantlet are supposed to bounce/ricochet anything at this angle. That's what pisses me off. Or why would you play an HT in the first place? I have to carefully aim in my shots to the copolas and these T10 guys can pen the Tiger II anywhere even if placed perfectly? There's already the weakspots anyway, coppola front of turret (outside mantlet), lower (and upper) plate.

1) As others have said, no, just no. Tier 8 tanks are not supposed to be invulnerable to tier 10.

2) Just because the client shows a hit to a specific location does not mean that the server agrees. It is an aspect of the game notoriously lag sensitive.

Well tbh.. you got raped by a tier X HT. Not many tier 8 HT's would toss that off. And Tiger I is a support HT with flat armor. Thus the insane ROF. It's almost 3 seconds faster pr shot then the Tiger P. That also needs a ROF buff as the armor has not been effective for years.

Tiger II needs some love indeed. Give it the Lowe pen, the Lowe snap shot ability, buff the side armor, and a ROF buff and a mobility buff. Make it do the role of a support HT in the age of super heavies and it can work again. Like the Tiger buffs did. As with the current meta, it needs some major armor buffs head on to work. I suspect it's easier to make it better as a support HT. As that's how most play it now anyway.

ZlatanArKung, on 22 December 2017 - 09:47 AM, said:

Let's compare the Tiger 2 to the new Caernarvon.

You made it sound like it was only The Tiger II. That comparison list is vs any tier 8 HT tbh.