Pages

Friday, January 27, 2017

Why Did NPAs rise so sharply in 2016?

In the previous article we saw that the
year 2016 saw a tremendous rise in NPAs across Banks in India and also saw the
outstanding NPA’s on a per bank basis. With those numbers in the background, it
is obvious that the Banking Industry in India is on the verge of a major
crisis. But, the more important question is, Why or How did this happen?

How did this NPA Story Come About?

In just the first 2 quarters of 2016,
nearly 2 lakh crores worth of NPAs were declared by banks. The interesting
question here is, how come Banks did not disclose these NPA’s all these years
and why are they doing it all of a sudden?

The RBI set a target of March 2017 for all
Banks to clean up their balance sheets and disclose the actual value of bad
loans. So, the banking system that had a tendency of hiding bad loans and show
a healthier than real figures to the investors, had to perform a clean-up and
slowly start declaring the true picture. Take any bank, they can’t just say in
Feb or March of 2017 that 10,000 crores is their NPA while the RBI released
this deadline more than a year back - Right?

How did Banks Get Away with Declaring Bad
Loans?

When a loan is in a restructured asset
category, it isn’t considered a Bad Loan or NPA yet. Banks happily pushed loans
at the first sight of trouble into this restructured loans basket and retained
them as regular assets. Since the loan isn’t declared an NPA, the very same
people could continue to borrow every more from the same banks or other banks
because the borrower isn’t tagged as a defaulter yet.

Why Did RBI give this deadline?

NPAs have always been a point of contention
between RBI and the Banks in general. If left unattended, the NPAs could
potentially drive the Indian Economy into a bottomless pit from which it cannot
recover. The RBI withdrew regulatory forbearance on restructured loans, making
it mandatory for banks to make provisions on a restructured loan at par with a
bad loan. This means, the banks have to set aside 15% of the loan amount as
provisions even if the loan is being restructured. Earlier provisions were only
required to be made for NPAs.

Previously if a 100 crore loan is not
receiving interested payments for 90 days, the banks had two choices – declare
100 crore as an NPA and mark the borrower as a defaulter. This would of course
look bad on the banks balance sheet. So, they mark this 100 crore as a “To be
Restructured” loan which technically isn’t an NPA yet and hence delayed adding
this 100 crores to the NPA bucket. By doing this clever trick, banks kept
adding more and more loans into this restructuring model and avoided adding
them as NPA. When RBI declared that provisions need to be made even for
restructured loans, banks don't have any incentive to keeping loans in the
restructuring bucket. Since the loans aren’t earning any interest, they might
as well mark them as an NPA and move on.

What Caused this Accumulation of Bad Loans
with Banks?

Take Indian overseas bank & UCO as
example, nearly 20% of their loans fall in the NPA category. Still, they are
functioning well with no one taking any flak for this scenario. Things are
going on per usual because they know that when the bank is in trouble, the
Government will Bail them out because at the end of the day, the Indian
Government owns these PSU Banks – plain and simple.

Most PSU Banks are like the puppets of the
ruling government. The Chairmen have no choice but to listen to their bosses in
the Government. In order to show quantity, quality gets compromised. PSU Banks
have indulged in careless lending and even if they want to scrutinize any
application or initiate recovery proceedings against a defaulter, there is
political intervention which results in the bank moving the loan into the
restructuring bucket.

In one of my earlier articles on the
kingfisher Vijay Mallya fiasco, a friend of mine had raised a question about
the multiple times the PSU Banks allowed the restructuring of loans taken by
Vijay Mallya without any collateral. More importantly, they allowed further
loans even though hundreds of crores worth of unpaid loans existed already.

Do you think a private bank would’ve
allowed something like this?

When compared to Government Run Banks,
Private Banks indulge in a more thorough evaluation or due-diligence before
sanctioning a loan. They also monitor borrowers post the loan disbursement much
better in comparison to PSU banks. To top it all off, they initiate recovery
proceeds when a loan becomes an NPA while PSU banks get pressure to restructure
loans instead of marking the borrower as a defaulter.

Have all NPA’s come out already?

I don't think so. NPAs are coming out in
truckloads and this scenario will most likely continue in the coming months
leading up to the deadline of March 2017.

Some Last Words:

In order for banks to keep aside cash
provisions against their bad loans, thousands of crores worth of money would
need to be infused into the banking system by the government. As I had
mentioned in my earlier article on Demonetization, willingly or not, citizens
have deposited nearly 14 lakh crores worth of old notes into the banking
system. So, banks have enough cash to meet these provisioning needs but this is
more like a temporary fix to a big problem.

Hopefully the RBI and Banks clean up their
act and avert a catastrophe that has just been delayed and could happen very
quickly unless otherwise…

What do you think about this situation?
Please sound off in the comments section.

Disclaimer: All statistics were taken from
the internet and the author does not guarantee the accuracy of the same or
assume any liability owing to them being incorrect. This is not a politically
motivated post and hence please avoid comments supporting or blaming any
political party in this blog.

Every Investor is looking for the next hot stock tip. A stock whose price will double or triple in a few months. However, one of the often ...

Important Disclaimer

All the contents of this blog are the Authors personal opinion only and are not endorsed by any Company. This website or Author does not provide stock recommendations. The purpose of this blog is to educate people about the financial industry and to share my opinion about the day to day happenings in the Indian and world economy. Contents described here are not a recommendation to buy or sell any stock or investment product. The Author does not have any vested interest in recommending or reviewing any Investment Product discussed in this Blog. Readers are requested to perform their own analysis and make investment decisions at their own personal judgement and the site or the author cannot be claimed liable for any losses incurred out of the same.