I absoultely hate the members on that site...its like there jackasses for the sake of being jackasses. I read a comment from some guy saying he was dissapointed because the movie didnt have Shia fucking a cat at the end. Real Mature. The review itself was ok, but that website has no credibilty with reviews in my eyes.

I absoultely hate the members on that site...its like there jackasses for the sake of being jackasses. I read a comment from some guy saying he was dissapointed because the movie didnt have Shia fucking a cat at the end. Real Mature. The review itself was ok, but that website has no credibilty with reviews in my eyes.

Click to expand...

Look at rotten tomatoes. They pretty much bitch about every movie unless it's some over rated mumbo jumbo.

Usually their reviews are off from the norm, but I like them. They usually bash just about every movie, so when they actually have overwhelming good reviews for a film, it usually is awesome.

Click to expand...

Usually I find it to be the opposite. If they love something universally, I usually don't like it much. If they hate something...well, I may hate it, but probably not as much. Harry is the worst, he loves some awful shit.

the irony is that with all the cries of "plant" coming from such a concentrated source, the AICN forum is becomming the epitomé of "brainwashed lackeys".
They're trying so hard to be 'alternative', they've all flopped over into delivering the same droning & bland soundbites of hate.

Yeah, well, there's definitely one or two members here that appear to plants as well. One member in particular who goes to suspiciously great lengths to justify absolutely anything & everything about the movie, director, writers, designs, etc. no matter how ridiculous what he's defending actually is at times. There's being open minded & objective, but this guy's spin doctoring is - imo - obviously beyond that of even the most eager fan. And what better place to throw a plant - on TFW2005 & Seibertron, argueably two of the most established TF sites.

Anyhoo... off to read the AICN "review"... though I'm sure it won't account for much as usual.

Yeah, well, there's definitely one or two members here that appear to plants as well. One member in particular who goes to suspiciously great lengths to justify absolutely anything & everything about the movie, director, writers, designs, etc. no matter how ridiculous what he's defending actually is at times. There's being open minded & objective, but this guy's spin doctoring is - imo - obviously beyond that of even the most eager fan. And what better place to throw a plant - on TFW2005 & Seibertron, argueably two of the most established TF sites.

Anyhoo... off to read the AICN "review"... though I'm sure it won't account for much as usual.

Click to expand...

If you're going to suggest someone here is a "plant" please name names. We all have a right to share your 'insight' and allow the person in question a right of reply, otherwise we can be allowed to say anything and get away with zero evidence to support it.

I've supported 100% of this movie from day 1. You saying I'm a "plant"? I'm quite prepared to accept that I'm in a minority (perhaps of one) in my 'blanket acceptance'. Thing is, if I can accept it, why can't you? Am I some kind of threat?

I could easily say some haters here are an AICN forum plants who came over to spread vitriol to undermine the movie because they hate Micheal Bay. I have no evidence to support it but, hey, I don't need any apparently!