BKITU:msupf: While I am sure she is still extremely attractive, there is very little reason in this day and age to accept that photo as unedited.

Have you ascertained this knowledge via inspection of minuscule point-details of the images, and also from having seen myriad other such ruses prior?

well, you know, the vast majority of evidence that rarely does a photo make it into a magazine without heavy editing kind of supports the skepticism of my comment. It is to the point that unless they make a statement saying x photo is unedited you can safely assume that it has been retouched in various ways.

This woman is amazing, she is four years my senior yet excites me more than any supposedly perfect younger woman, and in doing so has destroyed the fragile balance of the laws surrounding sexual reproduction.How is this possible? A woman in the final quadrant of existence showing no signs of wear or abuse? She is barely clinging to life after a terribly long life and yet she still glows like an orchid moth borne from a new moon.Witchcraft.

PizzaJedi81:Irving Maimway: She looks 20 years younger than Lindsey Lohan.

Amanda Bynes.

Also, I've got a pose Elle could repeat, if ya know what I mean, and I think you do.

I remember seeing shots of Elle on the beach with her kids last year and thinking "All these crazy party girls should take a long look at her and see what can await you if you bother to not go crazy with the coke and take care of yourself."

Of course I'm still waiting for Dana Delaney to call me back, so what do I know.

No arguing here about her body still looking fabulous, but that expression on the cover looks really weird and more like an outtake. Her mouth is agape and her eyes are slightly wonky - what were they thinking :/