Sonatype Blog: Latest Posts

How to Migrate from Ant to Maven: Project Structure

I’ve seen my fair share of projects migrating from Ant to Maven, and, for a complex project, this migration path can take some time. You have to worry about dependency management, project structure, and retraining an existing team to use Maven and understand the core concepts behind the tool. When you make the shift, you are often affecting development infrastructure for an existing project, and you need to take into account development environments as well as developer’s ideas about how code should be organized and stored in source control. In this post, I’m going to discuss a common pattern I’ve seen in Ant to Maven migrations: how to migrate the monolithic project.

A Common Pattern: The Monolithic Project

Ant projects which have evolved over many years often lack modular structure. While it is certainly possible to create the equivalent of a multi-module Maven project in Ant, the usual progression in an Ant project is to store all of your source in a single tree and use extra targets to selectively compile different packages. This approach is shown in the following figure.

In the most extreme cases, there is a single project which contains an array of modules. Maybe you have an entire enterprise system all stored in a single project alongside a complex Ant build.xml file which contains a collection of tasks for each component. A monolithic Ant project usually produces a series of artifacts: a JAR containing some API for clients, a server-side web application, a utility library, etc. Developers have usually grown so accustomed to this approach that the idea of splitting up a complex system into a series of related submodules can see daunting.

Moving to Maven: Do we need all these projects?

One of the first questions I get in a Maven migration from Ant is whether it is really necessary to modularize a project. “Do we really need to create all these projects for Maven?” (Short answer: Yes, there is no avoiding this.) This is usually accompanied by a concern that Maven limits each project to producing a single artifact. These are two core assumptions of Maven: your projects will be modularized and each project should produce a single build artifact.

Now, while these are core assumptions, there are ways around them, and I’ve even seen people go to extreme lengths in an attempt to preserve this single, monolithic project. You can create an elaborate set of profiles to modify the build depending on the context in which it is run, and you can attach extra build artifacts to a project using assemblies. Even though Maven makes assumptions about code layout and project structure, it can do just about anything, and in this case, it can be used to approximate the monolithic, combined Ant project.

If you do this, if you try to trick Maven the first thing you’ll notice is that your monolithic project’s POM is going to be somewhat unwieldy: it is going to be massive. Instead of a simple, declarative picture of a project, you are going to have a POM that contains multiple assembly definitions. Each assembly definition is going to have to explicitly define the structure of your build artifacts and you are going to find yourself venturing into includes and excludes patterns for things like the Maven Compiler plugin. In other words, you are going to have to expend a huge amount of effort to bend Maven to your assumptions.

If you do this, you really won’t be using “Maven”. You’ll be using your own interpretation of Maven, and once you go down this road, you are going to start having problems using standard tools designed for Maven. In short, don’t do this. Don’t try to bypass Maven’s approach to modularity with assemblies and profiles. If you do, you are going to find yourself “swimming upstream”, and your first hint is going to be the size and complexity of your POM files. I’ve certainly created some complex POMs in my time, but I only need to do this for projects that really require customization because they are doing something unique (see the POMs for the Maven book builds, they are large and extremely customized).

If you are creating web applications, EARs, and simple Java applications you shouldn’t have large POMs. If you do, it is probably a sign that you have ventured too far “off the map”. While you might be building your project with “Maven”, there is likely something wrong with your approach. If you find yourself constantly challenging an assumption as basic as project modularity, then you need to either rethink using Maven entirely or rethink your project structure.

Adopting Maven Means Adopting Modular Structure

If you are going to adopt Maven, you must adopt a modular project structure. If you don’t you will be fighting an uphill battle with Maven and the tools that have been designed to work with it. You will be fighting not only with Maven, but you’ll be doing constant battle with your IDE and your repository manager.

If you are moving from Ant to Maven, do you yourself a favor. Adopt a modular project structure. Don’t approach Maven as a “toolbox” like Ant with tasks and targets. Approach Maven as a framework with expectations and assumptions. If you do this, you’ll have a much easier time adopting the tool.

Post navigation

Nice article – we have gone through the same story recently and using a multi-module layout worked out great.

http://twitter.com/eciramella Edward J Ciramella

I’ve seen this over and over both in the maven user mailing list and in the real world. Someone reads some nice things about maven and plunges a development organization headfirst into maven. What they wind up with is a massively monolith build process that’s generating artifacts when in fact, there are no changes in the dependency stream.This article is a representation of the simplest code base – building a single deployable unit. What happens when your ant process generates 10 wars, 2 ears, dozens of libraries – with few changing in any given branch? What happens when each of those deployable units need to be configured for a dozen or more different environments?Can you guys take this to another level and help illuminate ways to cut apart a monolithic build structure?