On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, David Dorward wrote:
> I agree that it is not ideal, but assuming ISO-8859-1 for UTF-8
The validator *already* *does* check if a document can be
interpreted as UTF-8. If UTF-8 is possible, then OK!
> is no better than assuming UTF-8 for ISO-8859-1 documents.
No, no, no! Please read the two error reports you get on
http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/test.htm !!!
> Your argument appears to be "I use ISO-8859-1 therefore the validator
> should default to ISO-8859-1", which isn't, IMO, a very convincing
> one. Am I interpreting you incorrectly?
Yes!
<sigh>
I give up (for today).