7/5/2012: '''Account creation has been re-enabled for everyone.''' A Captcha is now installed for all new accounts as well as for adding URLs to pages. Please help keep an eye out for any spammers who slip through. If you have trouble creating an account, you can still request help by emailing rglasser@apollowebworks.com.

−

−

7/9/2012: Sorry folks, account creation is disabled again. The spammers apparently do not care about Captcha, and I'm working on a different solution. If you need an account, email your desired username to rglasser@apollowebworks.com.

−

{{Main Page Banner}}

{{Main Page Banner}}

Line 61:

Line 56:

----

----

−

Previously addressed arguments. The following articles feature detailed rebuttals to common apologetics in various media:

+

The following articles document apologetic issues and feature detailed rebuttals to common apologetics in various media:

−

* Recently, there was a group project to respond to the email titled "[[50 reasons to believe in god]]." The point of the exercise was to revise and expand any relevant articles so that each one provides a coherent rebuttal to a clearly stated theistic argument.

+

−

* ''[[The Way of the Master]]'' &mdash; apologist TV series featuring [[Ray Comfort]] and [[Kirk Cameron]].

+

* The [[argument from ignorance]], which claims that a proposition is true because it has not been shown to be false, is perhaps the most common [[logical fallacy]] in religious apologetics.

−

** "[[The Beauty of a Broken Spirit—Atheism (Way of the Master)|The Beauty of a Broken Spirit—Atheism]]" &mdash; a ''Way of the Master'' episode on atheism.

+

* A [[circular argument]] is where a premise relies of the conclusion of the argument being true. This is common in [[presuppositional apologetics]].

−

** "[[Evolution (Way of the Master)|Evolution]]" &mdash; a ''Way of the Master'' episode on evolution.

+

* Apologists often assume a questionable premise or a standard of evidence that is so low that, if applied consistently, would point to many contradictory conclusions. This is called a [[broken compass argument]].

The complexity of issues surrounding religion ensures that any proper assessment requires us to delve into a number of philosophical, historical and sociological topics. Our ultimate goal is to provide a robust and definitive resource for:

Apologists often assume a questionable premise or a standard of evidence that is so low that, if applied consistently, would point to many contradictory conclusions. This is called a broken compass argument.

Get involved — edit this site! If you're interested in contributing to the site (in the non-monetary sense), you must register first to get a username. You might also want to register at our IronChariots.org Forums so you can post over there.

If you want to contribute in the monetary sense, please see Site support.