US launches Tomahawks on Syrian airbases

Assad did it because he thought he could. He wants to squash the rebels.

He believed that Russia and the US are on his side, because they want his help against ISIS, so he did not think that the US or Russia would
retaliate, and that no other country would because they would not confront the US or Russia.

With all of those images of dead children all over the place, and the Media scrutinizing Trump at every turn...he kind of had too didn't he? Once
again, Trump is damned is he does, and damned if he doesn't. If he launches Missile's...he's a war monger, and the media will say NOTHING about him
protecting women and children, but if he doesn't do anything at all...then they will say Trump hates women and children and wants them dead. Sounds
like another false flag by the Liberal, ass kissing CIA to me.

Trump should of conducted a throrough investigation and presented proof it was Assad then bombed him.

Though I dont see the point. Why are chemical weapons any worse than conventional bombs as dead is still dead.

Syria will be given a bunch of S-400 platforms because of this. Those things are pretty impressive. Any US jet comes within range of one (the range is
pretty large) it's gonna have a bad day.

If Russia has perfected the S-500 enough for combat readiness, it's game over for any stealth crafts. Yea that is just a russian claim, but i don't
ever for one second discredit Russian missile and radar tech. It is top notch.

If he didn't strike, the media would have plastered him as a monster for not going to the aid of women and children. Hillary would have attacked them
too, but she would have done it with Nukes instead I bet.

I just heard some Schmuck on NPR say that the reason Trump struck Syria is because he's under investigation for Russian collusion, that this attack
makes it look like he's willing to strike a Russian ally, but that the whole thing was coordinated by Russia.

Well atleast one thing is for certain, people won't ever question Trumps boldness, but is that good or bad? Who knows. He definitely means what he
says and if he ever says he'll do something, you can bet he will..

With all of those images of dead children all over the place, and the Media scrutinizing Trump at every turn...he kind of had too didn't he? Once
again, Trump is damned is he does, and damned if he doesn't. If he launches Missile's...he's a war monger, and the media will say NOTHING about him
protecting women and children, but if he doesn't do anything at all...then they will say Trump hates women and children and wants them dead. Sounds
like another false flag by the Liberal, ass kissing CIA to me.

Trump should of conducted a throrough investigation and presented proof it was Assad then bombed him.

Though I dont see the point. Why are chemical weapons any worse than conventional bombs as dead is still dead.

Who says he didn't?

There is information that we in the public are not privy to, and things that even the media doesn't get. It's likely that the CIA informed Trump of
who did what...although, the CIA was probably behind it all. So, whether they lied to him or not, I am sure that he did research before just lobbing
missiles out of anger (that media is a pretty powerful brain-washing propaganda machine isn't it?)

If he didn't strike, the media would have plastered him as a monster for not going to the aid of women and children. Hillary would have attacked them
too, but she would have done it with Nukes instead.

Then we know some contractors are selling us crap weaponry. Better to know now than in the middle of a full-blown war.

It's the tomahawk cruise missile systems, you know the things we used in desert storm, you know in 1990.

Suspended a memorandum? Oh, the horror! Puh-leeze...

You say that, but it's not a memorandum like others. It's one that guarantees Russia will give advance notice and not engage. Same with Syria. If
Russia breaks it, so does Syria. Russia will definitely give Syria more S-400's.

With all of those images of dead children all over the place, and the Media scrutinizing Trump at every turn...he kind of had too didn't he? Once
again, Trump is damned is he does, and damned if he doesn't. If he launches Missile's...he's a war monger, and the media will say NOTHING about him
protecting women and children, but if he doesn't do anything at all...then they will say Trump hates women and children and wants them dead. Sounds
like another false flag by the Liberal, ass kissing CIA to me.

Trump should of conducted a throrough investigation and presented proof it was Assad then bombed him.

Though I dont see the point. Why are chemical weapons any worse than conventional bombs as dead is still dead.

Who says he didn't?

There is information that we in the public are not privy to, and things that even the media doesn't get. It's likely that the CIA informed Trump of
who did what...although, the CIA was probably behind it all. So, whether they lied to him or not, I am sure that he did research before just lobbing
missiles out of anger (that media is a pretty powerful brain-washing propaganda machine isn't it?)

2 days is not enough time for a investigation.

And after the lies our governments have peddled us these past years forgive me for not trusting the government one #ing Iota.
They need to present the public with evidence before I ever support them. I will NEVER take the governments word for anything.

a reply to: Indigo5
Give me access to the resources and funds that the CIA agents working in the field have at their disposal - and I'll go fetch you some equally
appalling reports that can't be confirmed/unnamed sources, video interviews with "victims" you can't identify or see, along with some heart breaking
and gut wrenching pictures of victims that could have (more likely) been put in that situation by any number of rebel/terrorist perpetrators in the
region - all to prove that XYZ (take your pick) is committing atrocities.

I'm sorry - but I live in a world where I know just how easy it is for this sort of stuff to be made up and sold to the masses as gospel. I'm all the
more skeptical of the ones that use the most vivid descriptions and pictures - trying to tug at the emotions as much as humanly possible. Just wreaks
of an agenda - trying to draw a specific response from viewers - an emotional knee-jerk response, which has once again demonstrated to be quite
effective even in this last installment.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.