>>6626088Uhh, that would actually be a great thing because the Caliph could tell his Akhbar Entourage to pause their Jihad and chill out with all the terrorism and shit. The Ottomans did this until their collapse.

>egyptGiving Israel the Sinai makes no sense. It has historically always been a part of Egypt, even long before the Israelites and never had a significant Jewish minority. Egypt's borders are fine the way they are.>israelTake away the Sinai and keep only half of Jordan including the Dead Sea. Too much Arabian land.>phoenciaBasically fine although that border jut in with Assyria bothers me.>greeceThey should only have Thrace, Western Anatolia and Cyprus. Central Anatolia was never Greek.>armeniaToo much land. They only ever populated Eastern Anatolia.>assyria/iraqMesopotamia shouldn't split and all Arabs should be in Arabia. Include Iraqi land and Assyria's borders are good.>kurdistan/iranKurdistan already exists in Iran so no independent state for the Kurds. Just have them reunite with their fellow Iranians. Iran should also have Azerbaijan.>arabiaTake southern Jordan and other Israeli lands in the peninsula and you're good.

Unironically by creating a pan-islamic union. Pretty much all problems there are caused by the ottoman empire being dissolved badly. Let them keep most of their local autonomy and within 1 or 2 generations war between them isn't realistic anymore, akin to the EU

>>6626071Bring back the Turks or bring back the Greeks. Someone who knows how to fight. Caucasians are small in numberArabs are cowardlyPersians are manletsSemites are SemitesEgyptians shouldn’t be called West Asian.

The map above is a 2006 proposed plan to redrawn the borders of the Middle East by Ralph Peters, a retired United States Army lieutenant colonel, author, and Fox News commentator. It was original published in the Armed Forces journal in an article titled Blood borders: How a better Middle East would look.

>>6626952It is flippant, of course, because you'd be burned at the stake if you tried to say it otherwise. But it is very true regardless, the best thing the world could do is turn most of the ME into glass and let Israel rebuild it.

>>6626410>be iran>russians conquer northern territory in early 1800s>russian empire falls and northern territory becomes an ssr of the new soviet union>soviet union falls and ssr gains independence>now people claim that this artificial tiny state tha was originally annexed from your own nation should rightfully rule the even larger azeri population still remaining in Iran...

>>6626138>Kurdistan already exists in Iran so no independent state for the Kurds>Kurdish land is already occupied by someone and this is the reason why they should be occupied by someoneWe got the worlds top scientists working 24/7 trying to figure out just how low your IQ has to be to have this "logic"

The best answers in the field of politics are usually based on the principle of sovereignty. When it comes to foreign affairs, the more the better: if there is an overriding concern about the stability of the world community, no international organisation can stand in the way of it, whether in the United States, NATO and Russia. If it is about security of states or international relationships, it should be decided on the bases of sovereignty. One has to think that the security of each country and its external neighbours (and of course other groups outside the US and NATO) is absolutely essential for a successful international relationship. It is therefore necessary to understand what exactly is the "balance of power" in global affairs according to a theory laid down by former US diplomat James Baker.

This is the core of a concept called sovereignty theory, which was developed by Harvard University professor William C. Wilson. His idea is that each state has the right to unilaterally decide and to declare, through the constitution itself or by a declaration published by the highest civil or state authority, its fundamental principles for establishing its own national boundaries

>>6626071Get ride of Sykes-Picot, give all of Iraq to Iran, deport all the Sunni from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine to Jordan and Saudi Arabia, create a Christian State in Lebanon/Syria called Neo-Assyria or the Levantine Republic, give the Sinai to Israel and start the Partition of Egypt by creating a "shelter" state for the Copts.

>>6628544What? The role of the Turk throughout Iranian history has been the brute, or as they themselves called it, 'People of the Sword' whilst the Persian were 'People of the Pen.' From Seljuks to Qajars, Persian viziers/vakils have been actually governing the state and creating the modern Iran as we know it today, whilst the Turks, heavily Persianized as they were, held the military and even sucked at that considering how much territory they lost. Making 50 sentence threads on Iranian history with bad English doesn't make you an expert on it.

>>6628611>bruteToday Turkic people are more Civilised than Iranic people, yeah they were savage in the some part of their history but not always>Persian viziersMany of them weren't Persiansalso Turks were governing most of Iran regions>sucked at defenseUnIronically better than Iranian military, your country was split twice in WW1&2 >your EnglishMy points remain right you silly racist Persian

>>6628697Get out of my thread history denying roach, the Persian empire's administration and organization was far past its age and even during the Umayyad, Abbasid and Ilkhanate eras Persians were philosophers, civil servants and high ranking government officials. Only the Safavid "Turks" contributed to Iranian history.

>>6628697>Today Turkic people are more Civilised than Iranic people, yeah they were savage in the some part of their history but not alwaysNice deflection, we're talking history. And even today, despite all westernization efforts, Turkey is slipping back into theocracy just like Iran did.>Many of them weren't PersiansThe governing class was almost exclusively Persian, as was the culture, because Turks had never governed before and had to adopt Persian administration just like the Arabs did. Not only that, they were so Persianized that they took Shahnameh, the Persian epic to be their history in an attempt to forget their tribal beginnings. The word 'Turk' was literally an insult to them. >UnIronically better than Iranian military, your country was split twice in WW1&2 Qajars still ruled in WW1 genius, and Iran didn't '''split''' in WW2, almost no blood was shed. On the other hand, when Persians were in charge of defense, mainland Persia was not breached once during 600 years of war with Rome.

>>6628740We are still talking about history though Turks took the best parts of the Arab and Iranian culture, in many parts of history they were more Civilised than botg groups>Turkey is slipping back into theocracy just like Iran didTurkey will continue being secular/Moderate Muslims majority of Turkic people aren't zealous in anyway, also I'm talking about all Turks not just Turkish people

That True, still many of them were Persians

Most of the late Qajar military were Iranians not Turks, and these events are humiliating to Iran military history>when Persians were in charge of defense, mainland Persia was not breached once during 600 years of war with RomeDid you read about Roman invasions of Azerbaijan ? Or nomadic invasions of east Iran ? After the short independence from the caliphate Iran was occupied by Seljuks and Ghaznavids who destroyed all Persian states of Iran

>>6628906How illiterate are you in Iranian history? Persians never stopped speaking Persian, and the ressurcture of Persian culture is credited firstly to Samanids and then to Saffarids. Seljuks spread Persian culture outside of Iran to Anatolia, Persian culture and language inside Iran was never in danger by the time they arrived.

>>6628912The populations of Greeks, Armenians and Syriacs/Assyrians that got wiped out of what is now Turkey still exist after relocating elsewhere, following their endangered original customs and language, this being one of the biggest effects of the 'genocide'. For instance, at least 30 rural villages were created in the French Mandate of Syria to house Assyrian refugees from the southeast corner of Turkey where they were once practically independent, before the 1840s. These villages were recently targeted by I.S.I.S. More areas were used to house them elsewhere, and the "Assyrian Pope" even was relocated to the U.S. for 70 years with two of them buried there. The same goes for former Turkish-residing Armenians and Greeks who also spoke dialects different from the people indigenous to the current Greece and Armenia.

>>6628906Iranian Intermezzo period was already well underway centuries before Turks were in any position to dictate anything in Iranian lands for centuries. Like this anon said here >>6628939, a revival of Iranian and Persian language, traditions, culture, festivals, and identity was going strong under dynasties and states like those of the Samanids, Buyids, Tahirids, Saffarids, etc...Turks only promoted Persianiate culture outside of Iranian lands. So the idea you cockroaches "saved" Iranian languages and culture is laughable.