The EFF on Thursday said in a statement it would not entertain the DA's motion because it was disingenuous.

Spokesperson Mbuyiseni Ndlozi said they approached the DA with the same proposal after the Constitutional Court’s Nkandla judgment of March 31, 2016. The court found President Jacob Zuma violated the Constitution when he ignored former public protector Thuli Madonsela’s recommendation that he repay some of the R246 million spent on so-called security upgrades to his private homestead.

The court found Parliament had failed to hold Zuma accountable.

"This judgment implied that the 5th democratic Parliament is illegitimate. On this basis the EFF approached the DA that Parliament must be dissolved through Section 46, and the DA refused," Ndlozi said.

IFP Chief Whip Narend Singh said the DA’s call came as a surprise and they had not discussed it yet.

Singh said it was unlikely his party would just agree simply because the DA had called for it. It required a lot of consideration, also money, and should not be taken lightly.

'Country in need of fresh mandate'

DA deputy chief whip Mike Waters said South Africans should be given the chance to state if they still had faith in the ANC.

"According to the Constitution, after three years you're entitled to dissolve Parliament if the need arises, and we obviously believe the need has arisen.”

He said during the motion of no confidence debate, the ANC said it was confident voters still supported the party.

“I don't see why they would be scared to go to the country and get a fresh mandate."

Waters said the country had changed over the last three years since the fifth Parliament was elected in May 2014.

"It's proven without a shadow of a doubt that the government is corrupt, has been captured, and that within the ANC there are now divisions. So therefore a fresh mandate needs to be sought from the electorate."

Waters said he could not comment on Holomisa's concerns about the IEC's budget, but said the commission should be ready for early elections.