Is there anyone here that still doubts that the ultimate end goal for the Jew is globalization, world government and world currency. There should also be no doubt that this so called financial "crisis" has brought us to the brink of such a system. Only a few years ago if a person suggested that we were headed toward world currency, that same person would have been called nuts. Now this global money seems inevitable. The one thing that should be taken from this particular article isn't whether or not we should hope for this type of world government or another, because we shouldn't accept this in any form, but the real truth here is the new found willingness of the people to embrace it.

A world government will never recognize your race. World government will bring about more racial destruction.

Ronald Reagan was a hidden curse to the white race. The arms race and economic squeeze against the Soviet Union had already becan under the Carter administration. But the "Shadow council" wanted a new era on faceless and mindless politicans leading America ton bankrupcy and there favorite pet project(i've taked about this earlier. Not going to details but will let you just guess) Thats why chose Ronnie, who made the immigration problem WORSE, allowed ousotching to start, and BURRIED any hopes of s true friendship between the American and Russian peoples. Bush Juniors was just a Ronnie wannabe. Ronnie and Margareth began the policies then bought the white western world to it's KNEES! Because there Shadow government puppets also known as "ZOG" There agenda is economic enslavement for ZOG and world war(ok, now i said it) to hide there plans for to destroy the middle-class. The greatest threat the white race has probobly EVER faced=Coporate FACISM! Compared to this the commies were pussies

As absolutely terrible as Marxism is, the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe never got filled to the brim with non-White immigration. Can you imagine what the Eastern Europe might look like if after 1945 Russia was capitalist? My God, it might look like France does today, crawling with tons of non-Whites!

Our Eastern European brothers definitely needed to end communist tyranny, but capitalism is the last thing they need! They still have something of an industrial infrastructure. How about the United States? Doh!

Realisticly speaking the only way to create world governtment would be a world war. The ULTIMATE plan for the elite! This also helps to explain the immigration SURGE to America;a faceless multicultural genepool will be easier to kick around after the war, and help rebuild America under direct controll of the elite

Ahmadinejad is vilified by the Jews, clobbered by our controlled media, feared by the Neocons, ostracized by our trecherous elites as yet another 'New Hitler' (you wish!), so he simply must be doing something right. He deserves respect. I don't care about Muslims as long as they stay in their own lands, which this paricular Muslim does.
As a National Socialist I have only contempt for Capitalism (as well as Communism). I don't want to start another Capitalists vs. NS shouting match - I started several already and my views are well known - so I will stop here for now.

Realisticly speaking the only way to create world governtment would be a world war. The ULTIMATE plan for the elites! This also helps to explain the immigration SURGE to America;a faceless multicultural genepool will be easier to kick around after the war, and help build America direct controll of the elite

You are exactly right. Left unchanged, the global capitalist system will motivate the next world war.
And you have described a strategic reason for the big capitalist concerns to support multiculturalism---changing the people into an scrambled mixed-race low-pay proletarian mass which is more easily and cheaply controlled by the tiny few in the global elite.

A few words about capitalism, communism and OUR economics from Dr. William Pierce:

The message above from Dr. Pierce is straight to the heart of the matter. THIS is National Socialist racial economy which the capitalists and communists fear White people finding out about, because they know our people would embrace it passionately.
Can you imagine the possibilites for our race if America (let alone, several White Nations together) actually forged this kind of economy Dr. Pierce is talking about?

One last point: Some might say "Well, it's not laissez faire capitalism because of increased government intervention. Government intervention is socialist." They fail to acknowledge that government planning and intervention can also be CAPITALIST---the big capitalist concerns control the state for their own economic purpose, not to "help the people". Governement regulation today serves big capitalist concerns and helps them put down competitors---it ain't socialist (it definitely does not serve the interest of our people). The biggest global capitalist concerns use government regulation to screw competitors and free the economy up for themselves as much as they can get away with. They do a similar thing in the political arena---thus in America we have the two-party lockup.

Excellent, excellent post, and thanks for quoting Dr. Pierce on National Socialism!

__________________

"What we have to fight for is the freedom and independence of the fatherland, so that our people may be enabled to fulfill the mission assigned to it by the [C]reator."-Adolf Hitler

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."-Goethe

"Homosexuality is not a civil right. Its rise almost always is accompanied, as in the Weimar Republic, with a decay of society and a collapse of its basic cinder block, the family."-Patrick Buchanan

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.-Edmund Burke

"We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid Galilee of its Arab population."
-- David Ben-Gurion (Founding Father of the State of Israel and First Israeli Prime Minister), from Ben-Gurion, a Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar (May 1948)

Ahmadinejad is vilified by the Jews, clobbered by our controlled media, feared by the Neocons, ostracized by our trecherous elites as yet another 'New Hitler' (you wish!), so he simply must be doing something right. He deserves respect. I don't care about Muslims as long as they stay in their own lands, which this paricular Muslim does.
As a National Socialist I have only contempt for Capitalism (as well as Communism). I don't want to start another Capitalists vs. NS shouting match - I started several already and my views are well known - so I will stop here for now.

Thanks for correcting Blue Wolf; I considered doing so myself, but did not want this thread to be derailed into an argument about the Iranians and race/religion. We all need to be corrected from time to time.

Ahmadinejad is vilified by the Jews, clobbered by our controlled media, feared by the Neocons, ostracized by our trecherous elites as yet another 'New Hitler' (you wish!), so he simply must be doing something right. He deserves respect. I don't care about Muslims as long as they stay in their own lands, which this paricular Muslim does.
As a National Socialist I have only contempt for Capitalism (as well as Communism). I don't want to start another Capitalists vs. NS shouting match - I started several already and my views are well known - so I will stop here for now.

Now is the time to really bring it up. The racialists who are caught up in conservatism and cheerleeding for some romanticized capitalism need to hear the facts of racial economics. Capitalism is killing our race, more slowly but more surely than even communism did (Eastern Europe is still basically White, after all...but every single major Western capitalist nation is filling up with oodles of non-Whites).

Now, in this economic crisis, racialists need to toss in the capitalist conservative towel and turn to a real alternative to capitalism and communism.

The late Dr. Pierce draws the appropriate conclusion which every serious racialist needs to draw now:

Quote:

There are two fundamental criteria which must be used for judging each and every governmental intervention in economic matters. They are, first, the long-range welfare and progress of the race; and second, human nature. Which is to say that in evaluating any economic policy we must ask ourselves two questions: Will this policy ultimately be beneficial or detrimental to the quality of our race? And is it in accord with human nature?

We look first at the racial effects of a policy and insist that they must be positive—or at least not negative—and then we insist that the policy be based on a clear and realistic understanding of human nature, so that it is workable.

We can understand better the significance of these two principles if we consider briefly two quite different economic systems, Marxism and laissez-faire capitalism.

Marxist economics has human happiness rather than racial progress as its ostensible aim, and it is based on assumptions that are at odds with reality and with human nature. It aims at providing material comfort for everyone, more or less equally. It cannot even admit the possibility of racial progress, because that implies that some types of men are inherently superior to others and that some directions of development are more desirable than other directions.

Whether one prefers the Marxist goal of the greatest happiness for the greatest number or the National Alliance goal of stronger, wiser, and more beautiful men and women is a matter of one’s values. It was not on its choice of values that Marxism foundered, however, but on its refusal to recognize the fact of human inequality and the nature of human motivation. When people are not permitted to work for their own profit and advancement, they do not work well; and when a society’s leaders do not attain their positions through their own strength and merit, that society is likely to be ill led.

In contrast to the Marxist system, we recognize the need to permit people to compete, to reap the fruits of their labor, and to exercise leadership according to their demonstrated ability. They will work harder and more efficiently and will order themselves in a hierarchy of ability. The result will be a stronger, better led, and more prosperous society. There will, of course, be those individuals who will not work or whose natural abilities are such that they cannot compete effectively. Rather than following the Marxist path of robbing the successful in order to reward the unsuccessful, we must take measures to ensure that society’s lowest elements do not multiply and become more numerous in later generations.

The laissez faire capitalist system provides another illustrative contrast. Under such a system the society as a whole has no goals: there are only the goals of individual men and women. The capitalist system, like ours, provides strong incentives for individuals: the strong, aggressive, and clever rise and prosper, and the weak, indecisive, and stupid remain at the bottom. Leaders tend to be capable—at least, in the capitalist economic environment, with its special conditions.

Without a unifying principle, however, a capitalist society easily can fall prey to certain inherent weaknesses. One of these weaknesses is the instability which leads the rich to become richer and the poor to become poorer, not solely because of differences in ability but because the possession of capital gives the possessor an enormous advantage in the competition for more capital. When personal gain is the only motivation in a society, those who already are rich can arrange things to favor themselves: they can block threats to their power in ways which may be destructive to the welfare of the society as a whole. They can hold down the price of labor, limit healthy competition within the society, and exploit the environment without regard for the long-range consequences.

The overly rigid social stratification resulting from unrestricted capitalism can lead to endemic class hostility and even to class warfare. It can slow racial progress by making the ability to acquire and hold capital the supreme survival trait.

We need an economic system which, in contrast to Marxism, allows individuals to succeed in proportion to their capability and energy, but which, in contrast to capitalism, does not allow them to engage in socially or racially harmful activity, such as stifling competition or importing non-White labor. We need to structure our economic system so that it cannot fall prey to the instability of capitalism. We need to maintain social flexibility, so that capable and energetic individuals always have the possibility of rising. We need to ensure that capital does not have the possibility of changing society’s rules to suit itself. The way to achieve and maintain an economic system which meets these criteria is to design and govern the system subject to the supreme principle: the ultimate aim of all economic policy is racial progress.

I know I made the same quote of Dr. Pierce twice in this thread today...but he bears repeating often, especially on something as fundamental as this economic issue.

There is nothing wrong with being a Muslim Arab in an Islamic Arab country. [...]

And all the other folks who have committed this faux pas:
As Rudel mentioned before, never ever call Iranians "Arabs". This is a major offence to them. Persians look at Arabs approximately the same way we regard Gypsies. (The Jewish media intentionally seeks to hide this all the time, so it is not your fault and your are not guilty).