Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cuthttp://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashx(c) Roadfood.com Discussion Board30RE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (lleary)Does anyone have an opinion about the &quot;crispy&quot; versions of french fries that are showing up in some restaurants these days? The texture seems wrong and the flavor is, well, disppointing.<br><br>Lori L.<br>Mountain Top, PAhttp://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10845Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:58:15 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (luv)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by scbuzz</i><br><br />I like thin cut fries, fried crispy and brown ! I do not care for thick and mealy fries !<br><br>me, too! but i like the mushy fries or batter-dipped fries.<br><br><br><br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10844Sat, 07 May 2005 00:51:38 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (MissKitty)No, no one likes being lied to but hey, we're talking about multinational fast food corporations here, it comes with the territory :)http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10843Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:43:33 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Jayla)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by MissKitty</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by dctourist</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br />I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Know<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br>I suspect they'd absorb MORE oil because they have more surface area than regular fries...<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'> But then how come White Castle's (wich sells Crinkle Cut Fries) website says that their Small order of Fries has 115 Calories and 6g of Fat...and McDonald's Small Fries (wich are about the same size as the small from White Castle) but they have like 210 Calories and 11g of Fat ??? This is Kinda confusing <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[B)]" />" /><br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br><br>I have no clue. There are no White Castles where I live, I don't go into McDonalds and I don't really go around meticulously comparing food values of different fast food items. My advice was based on general food rules ( which also applies to roast potatoes etc ie a potato cut into 2 big chunks absorbs less oil than if it were cut into several smaller chunks ). I would suggest you contact both the companies direct to get further information. But to my mind, if youre going to worry overmuch about the fat content of stuff, stay away from fast food full stop <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/001_smile.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/001_smile.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:)]" />" /><br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'> No, I'm not that worried about the fat content of the food...it's just that I don't like being deceived and I don't think anyone really likes being lied to ya know? So I was just wondereing why that info was conflicting with the info on their site but Oh well I guess we'll never know...<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/biggrin.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/biggrin.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:D]" />" />http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10842Sat, 09 Apr 2005 19:39:10 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (MissKitty)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by dctourist</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br />I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Know<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br>I suspect they'd absorb MORE oil because they have more surface area than regular fries...<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'> But then how come White Castle's (wich sells Crinkle Cut Fries) website says that their Small order of Fries has 115 Calories and 6g of Fat...and McDonald's Small Fries (wich are about the same size as the small from White Castle) but they have like 210 Calories and 11g of Fat ??? This is Kinda confusing <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[B)]" />" /><br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br><br>I have no clue. There are no White Castles where I live, I don't go into McDonalds and I don't really go around meticulously comparing food values of different fast food items. My advice was based on general food rules ( which also applies to roast potatoes etc ie a potato cut into 2 big chunks absorbs less oil than if it were cut into several smaller chunks ). I would suggest you contact both the companies direct to get further information. But to my mind, if youre going to worry overmuch about the fat content of stuff, stay away from fast food full stop <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/001_smile.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/001_smile.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:)]" />" />http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10841Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:50:25 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Jayla)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Adjudicator</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by dctourist</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br />I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Know<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br>I suspect they'd absorb MORE oil because they have more surface area than regular fries...<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'> But then how come White Castle's (wich sells Crinkle Cut Fries) website says that their Small order of Fries has 115 Calories and 6g of Fat...and McDonald's Small Fries (wich are about the same size as the small from White Castle) but they have like 210 Calories and 11g of Fat ??? This is Kinda confusing <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[B)]" />" /><br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br><br>Hmmmm. I think &quot;Jayla&quot; may be a &quot;player&quot;.<br><br><img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_clown.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_clown.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:o)]" />" /><br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'> HuH ? What do ya' mean by &quot;player&quot; ?http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10840Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:08:27 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Adjudicator)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by dctourist</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br />I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Know<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br>I suspect they'd absorb MORE oil because they have more surface area than regular fries...<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'> But then how come White Castle's (wich sells Crinkle Cut Fries) website says that their Small order of Fries has 115 Calories and 6g of Fat...and McDonald's Small Fries (wich are about the same size as the small from White Castle) but they have like 210 Calories and 11g of Fat ??? This is Kinda confusing <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[B)]" />" /><br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br><br>Hmmmm. I think &quot;Jayla&quot; may be a &quot;player&quot;.<br><br><img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_clown.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_clown.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:o)]" />" />http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10839Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:02:59 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Jayla)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by dctourist</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br />I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Know<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br>I suspect they'd absorb MORE oil because they have more surface area than regular fries...<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'> But then how come White Castle's (wich sells Crinkle Cut Fries) website says that their Small order of Fries has 115 Calories and 6g of Fat...and McDonald's Small Fries (wich are about the same size as the small from White Castle) but they have like 210 Calories and 11g of Fat ??? This is Kinda confusing <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[B)]" />" />http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10838Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:32:01 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (dctourist)To answer the original question, as long as they aren't fried with a coating on them, straight, crinkle cut, fat, skinny, doesn't matter to me.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10837Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:35:51 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (dctourist)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br />I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Know<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br>I suspect they'd absorb MORE oil because they have more surface area than regular fries...http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10836Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:34:43 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Jayla)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by MissKitty</i><br><br /><blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br />I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Know<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br><br>No, they actually absorb more oil due to the increased surface area of their shape. If you are trying to eat healthier fries, stick to the thickest cut ones you can find if eating out or making them at home.<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'> HUH ? THEN HOW COME THE FRIES AT WHITE CASTLE (WICH ARE CRINKLE CUT FRENCH FRIES BY THE WAY) ONLY HAVE 6g OF FAT AND 115 CALORIES ??? I'M CONFUSED <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/icon_smile_blackeye.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[B)]" />" />http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10835Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:17:19 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (mousec)I went to an Irish pub last week and had thick cut fries with malted vinegar, I am a changed man. Also, I like my (thin cut) fries with warm BBQ sauce, nothing worse then dipping your fries into ice box cold sauce.<br><br>One other item of note is that I am not a big fan of cheese fries but in college (Western Illinois) we used to go to a local bar for hamburger ponies (could make a pony out of any meat but at that time this was my posion of choice). In a nutshell it was a plate covered in waffle cut fries, then burger then it was all smothered in a terrific cheese sauce. Not certain what was in that sauce but man was it good.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10834Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:07:10 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (MissKitty)<blockquote id='quote'><font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'>quote:<div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'><i>Originally posted by Jayla</i><br><br />I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Know<br></div></blockquote id='quote'></font id='quote'><br><br>No, they actually absorb more oil due to the increased surface area of their shape. If you are trying to eat healthier fries, stick to the thickest cut ones you can find if eating out or making them at home.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10833Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:14:48 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (AndreaB)I prefer shoestrings, straight cut, or steak fries to the crinkle variety. I've found most of the crinkle cut to have that mealy texture. And, I usually just eat fries with good old ketchup or malt vinegar! Wilson's Pool Hall here in Versailles has killer fries and onion rings. McD's used to be good, but after that beef tallow debacle they're a mere shadow of their former self. <br> My mother used to buy those Ore Ida crinkle cut fries and bake them in the oven and they never turned out very good. They were edible, but mealy. <br><br>Andreahttp://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10832Sat, 19 Mar 2005 06:49:29 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Jayla)I heard that Crinkle Cut Fries are Healthier because they absorb less oil due to their texture ! Is that true ??? Has anyone else heard this also ??? Let Me Knowhttp://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10831Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:34:16 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Tommy B)I don't know what it is about McDonald's fries, but when they are fresh-out-of-the-fryer, with a complement of salt,<br>boy, they are just plain good french fries.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10830Thu, 28 Aug 2003 05:29:18 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (lleechef)Having worked as an R & D chef in the food industry, not specifically potatoes but having connections with them......here's the skinny on the spuds: The krinkle cut ones are kind of shredded and re-formed then coated. The shoestrings are just cut and coated. All French fries (bought for foodservice and frozen) now have coatings on them that induce crunch, heat, or taste. Billion dollar companies like Ore-Ida and Simplot, for example (the potato end) and NewlyWeds Foods (the crunch/coating/keep the heat in end) vie for our dollars when we buy French fries. Remember when the curly fries first came out? That was a HUGE score for NewlyWeds Foods because they invented the coating that kept them hot longer and still tasty and crispy. For me, I love the French fries in Belgium, fresh potatoes with the skin on, twice dipped in the hot oil and served up with your choice of dipping sauce; the best for me being Sauce Americaine (like a tartar sauce with tomato paste and Tabasco.....yummy!!!!). And they actually TASTE like potatoes! Go figure! <img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/biggrin.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/biggrin.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:D]" />" />http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10829Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:32:32 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (pearlie)I love fries, or as I grew up in Toronto calling them, chips...with mayo, with malt vinegar, and/or gravy...but...NO ketchup, please.<br><br>And that's only if the fries/chips in question are the thick &quot;English style,&quot; chips, made from fresh potatoes. Ketchup does not work with those. Save it for replicachips, like McDonald's.<br>If said fries/chips are the skinny French style we call &quot;frites,&quot; then we limit the toppings to the vinegar, and maybe the mayo.<br><br>And, if we're feeling really low-down Canadian, and ready to salute our French cousins, we love a Poutine--that would be yer thick chips with tons o' gravy [or what's called Swiss Chalet sauce here, or St-Hubert sauce--those are broiled chicken chains that make a good greasy chicken sauce with mysterious seasonings...]and cheese curds on top.<br>Yup, a poutine is disgusting. But quite good.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10828Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:56:12 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Lucky Bishop)I like mayo -- or even better, aioli -- on fries, if they're Belgian style. There's a place called Frites in Greenwich Village that serves nothing but Belgian frites with something like 80 different sauces. No trip to New York City is complete for my wife and I without a stop at Frites followed by a stop at the milkshake-and-grilled-cheese place around the corner on St. Mark's Place.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10827Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:11:16 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (EdSails)Yes on the sweet potato fries.....yummmmmm........but I'll leave the mayo off!http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10826Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:49:41 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Sundancer7)Peppertree: The place you talked about that served six kinds of fries sort of remind me of the Waffle House doing six kinds of has browns. Real Great idea.<br><br>I really like fries with gravy even better than ketchup<br><br>Paul E. Smith<br>Knoxville, TNhttp://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10825Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:40:36 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (peppertree)Avalon Drug Store in Houston, TX is the one with six varieties of Fries. Even Fries in Gravy. Avalon was written up in a prior edition of Road Food. Good burgers too.<br><br>Wetson's: For me, the great irony is about their demise, they were purchased by Nathan's and converted some of the Wetson's to Nathan's and others were closed. No more straight cut fries at the place where I had my first straight cut. Taken over by the place where I had my first crinkle cut. <br><br>Wetson's was kind of like McDonalds in the sixties. There were few McDonalds in the city. The fries were greasy at Wetson and so were the burgers. But so was McD and everyone else back in the good old Greasy Sixties. In fact, in many ways Wetson's was a McD knockoff. McDonalds has straight edge fries too.<br><br>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10824Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:25:27 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (muzzlehatch)I like 'em all shapes and sizes, though I've had more bad crinkle-cut experiences than I'd like. Had some great waffle-cuts (Buffalo Joes in Evanston, IL)...I think that variety only works if they're super-fresh, which they always are at BJs. On the whole I've probably had more good thickish seasoned well-done fries than anything else. Oh, and this may be sacrilege to many of you, but I prefer them with MAYO. Learned that in Germany. Mmmm.<br><br>But the absolute best fries I've had are probably the olive-oil fried, thyme/oregano/rosemary seasoned steak fries at Cross-Rhodes, a wonderful small-menu Greek restaurant in Evanston, IL that just has a few basics (spanakopita, moussaka, gyros, and some AMAZING 1/2 # super-fresh burgers) besides those amazing fries. And this is the first time I've mentioned them, despite living around the corner (literally) for 9 years! Oh well, sometimes the obvious escapes you.<br><br>Also love sweet potato fries. But mayo is the key!http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10823Sun, 22 Jun 2003 00:58:51 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (meowzart)Hoooweee! I just love potatoes. And I LOVE french fries. I love them shoestring and crinkle cut. I love steak fries, fresh cut fries, skin-on fries, boardwalk fries, and even the hoity-toity frites. Ever been to Houston's? (a chain, I know!) But their fries are about as thin as you can get...more like a matchstick fry...and always perfectly done. I love them. <br><br>The way I see it, crinkle cuts hold the ketchup better (especially the ketchup out of a plastic squeeze bottle...natch<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/tongue_smilie.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/tongue_smilie.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[:p]" />" />). Shoestrings are for dunking in the ketchup, not putting on top. But in all honesty, I am a purist. Just the potatoes and the salt, and I am good to go. No condiments, no vinegar.<br><br>Yum!<br>Meowzarthttp://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10822Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:48:22 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Willly)While my favorite fries are handcut straight (Like at In-n-Out), there is something to be said for crinkle cuts and their potential for crunch. Harry's in Colchester, CT double fries their standard frozen crinkle cuts -- the second fry really pulls out the moisture and gives great crunch and taste. If you're driving on Rt. 2 towards the Casinos or beachs, it's worth a stop.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10821Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:06:13 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (MoBob)As I stated in another thread, I wish we would have had the Crinkle Cut fry option in the recent Favorite French Fry vote.<br>I love Crinkle Cuts although I prefer them not to be not too thick and not too thin, just medium with a crispy outside and soft inside. (not too hard to please, am I?)<br>They reason for the wavy cut is to provide more surface area to the hot oil to crisp.<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/thumbup1.gif" alt="" data-smiley="<img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/thumbup1.gif" alt="" data-smiley="[8D]" />" />http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10820Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:48:21 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Lucky Bishop)I'm fond of what are mostly called steak-cut fries: thin on one axis and broad on the other, for an improved surface-to-mass ratio.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10819Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:55:19 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (ConeyIslandLou). I remember the first non crinkle fries I ate was at a chain called Wetson's. They had a franchise at Empire Blvd. and Flatbush Ave. in Brooklyn. I ate the fries and liked them. Ever since then I will eat any fries.<br><br>What exactly was Wetson's like? They never came up our way,all we had in the 60's was Carrol's<br><br>I think that Nathan's is the best. I even like their fries better than their franks.<br></blockquote><br>I've always thought that too! I am always surprised how good the local Nathans-in-the-mall is! There is a DEFINITE difference in the Nathans in the the malls [and,of course at CI!],and the Nathans that you find at the service areas,and at those horrible 'combination' places in Manhattan- I BELIEVE the mall Nathans are under direct control by Nathans Famous,inc, and the 'service area/Mahattan' stores are under the management of the infamous Riesce [sp?]Comapny<br><br><br>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10818Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:56:19 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (Ort. Carlton.)Dearfolk,<br> My preference is for the fat, crinkle-cut fries. The Grill in Athens, Georgia has some mighty good ones, especially when served with feta dressing. Yumsville!<br> Pavlovianly Salivating Madly, Ort. Carlton, three blocks from The Grill as I peck.<br>P. S. 99 posts and all is well!http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10817Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:12:00 GMTRE: Fries: straight vs. crinkle-cut (peppertree)When I was little (under 8) about the only place my folks took me to was Nathan's because I could make all the noise I want and no one cared. I would only eat crinkle cut fries until I was about ten. I remember the first non crinkle fries I ate was at a chain called Wetson's. They had a franchise at Empire Blvd. and Flatbush Ave. in Brooklyn. I ate the fries and liked them. Ever since then I will eat any fries.<br><br>I found a restaurant in Houston (with the help of the Sterns' book) that has six varieties of fries. They even have fries in gravy. I can't remember the name of the restaurant.<br><br>I think that Nathan's is the best. I even like their fries better than their franks.http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/rss-m10804.ashxFindPost/10816Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:03:02 GMT