SPF sucks

On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:12 -0600, Michael L Torrie wrote:
> In my quest to implement a mixed Google Mail/Postfix mail solution for
> my domain, I just came across a situation that shows how SPF really
> really sucks and is fundamentally broken.
Nobody ever claimed SPF was a 100% solution... Although a few crack
smokers tried to make it a 100% solution by designing an insane header
rewriting solution. While you're falling in love with SPF, might as well
jump in with both feet.
--
Stuart Jansen e-mail/jabber: sjansen at buscaluz.org
google talk: stuart.jansen at gmail.com
"However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at
the results." -- Winston Churchill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20070627/525b78f6/attachment.bin