originally posted by: HauntWok
Na, that was a test. It incurred the response i was expecting.

What was that? To see if a race baiting off topic post filled with vulgarity and insults would be removed?

If that was your objective you succeeded. You did not, however, demonstrate why your Original Post is correct and only reinforced the wide perception
already present here that you have a fundamental and total inability to understand the Constitution and the rights enumerated within. Owning a firearm
does not automatically compel the owner to participate in vigilantism for every injustice perpetrated upon the citizenry.

I don't see a failure honestly. Why would I want to defend people who are intent on burning and looting their own neighborhoods? Also honestly, some
of those same neighborhood stores are still in business because the owners were armed.

Epic fail on your part as far as I'm concerned.

Idiots argue, intelligent people debate.

No hard feelings.

what you are really saying is..."everyone of those negros loot and burn, and I don't give a damn about them, so what if one boy was shot"...now if
they were white and had cattle, but they had been in trouble with the BLM for 20 years over paying their fair share of taxes like every other rancher
around there, then that's the time to show deadly force with AR's, if someone messed with him.

no that's not what he is "really saying". It is what you are interpreting and I would expect nothing less from you.

see, that's the problem....I interpreted like that, and I'm an old white guy, that is left of center, and still believes in the constitution
including the 2nd. how do you think black and brown people interpret what was said?

Say, what was the official word on Ferguson? Was the shooting justified? I haven't seen the news on that.
(hint, if you don't know either, then perhaps this thread is as ignorant as others have stated)

Well, you were right. It was a very thinly veiled racist attack on anyone who was pro-Second Amendment as underscored by the vile, hateful and
tremendously racist post he made on the last page.

Vilifying firearms owners for not running around and shooting people because they 'hate black people' is not exactly a great premise for an Original
Post and in reality only exposes ones own disturbing views on race, firearms, vigilantism and the rights of citizens.

As many pro-Second Amendment posters have stated on this and other threads a person's ethnicity has nothing to do with the Second Amendment and quite
a few unequivocally stated that we would support and defend citizens who were under sustained government abuse of their Constitutional rights.

I don't see a failure honestly. Why would I want to defend people who are intent on burning and looting their own neighborhoods? Also honestly, some
of those same neighborhood stores are still in business because the owners were armed.

Epic fail on your part as far as I'm concerned.

Idiots argue, intelligent people debate.

No hard feelings.

what you are really saying is..."everyone of those negros loot and burn, and I don't give a damn about them, so what if one boy was shot"...now if
they were white and had cattle, but they had been in trouble with the BLM for 20 years over paying their fair share of taxes like every other rancher
around there, then that's the time to show deadly force with AR's, if someone messed with him.

no that's not what he is "really saying". It is what you are interpreting and I would expect nothing less from you.

see, that's the problem....I interpreted like that, and I'm an old white guy, that is left of center, and still believes in the constitution
including the 2nd. how do you think black and brown people interpret what was said?

No you missed the point T was making. Why would anyone go in to defend people while they are destroying their own neighborhood. He didn't mention
race. It could have been white folks destroying their neighborhood and the statement would have still been sound. I have seen your posts. It seems to
me you cry racist at the full moon. You see racism in everything. On that I don't agree with you.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.