it is not sure just where it is ("C"). However, it is sure where it isn't ("B"), within reason, and it knows where it was ("A"). It now subtracts where it should be ("B") from where it wasn't ("C"), or vice versa, a

it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was ("A"). The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where

is not the position that it wasn't ("B"), the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is ("C") and where it wasn't ("B"). If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it t

Consequently, the position where it is ("B") is now the position where it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was ("A") is now the position where it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in ("C") is not the posit

The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is ("A") to a position where it isn't ("B"), and arriving at a position where it wasn't ("B"), it now is. Consequently, the position where it is

By this I mean, there were people sending out messages via site titles. I didn't see any that asked for a response, though. As far as I know, I'm the only person who's ever tried to strike up a conversation on spy.