On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 10:20 AM 2/13/2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> >> No; the LGPL would provide a way for the vendors to sabotage
> >> one another -- and, most likely, ALL fail as businesses.
> >
> >Sabotage? Brett, you might be getting a bit carried away here.
>> No, I'm not. Richard Stallman himself has stated that the purpose
> of the GPL's "poison pill" is to turn developers against their
> colleagues and the organizations for which they work. His writings
> even urge programmers to put GPLed code into the work they do for
> their employers for the express purpose of forcing them to give
> away the code!
You keep on making unsubstantiated claims like this.
Post some *exact* references (not quotes) to papers or transcriptions which
support each of your points or I do not see how anyone on this list can continue
to take you seriously.
Plato
(Do not CC me, please. I am on the list)