I strongly disagree with this method of benchmarking. While it would give a more realistic approach, each card would experience something different making the results irrelevant and inconsistent. I think the way everyone else does it (including SKYMTL) is the best and most accurate approach by a long shot.
James

Lol tell that to Kyle. He thinks it's the best way to do it. And although I think it's nice to see the highest playable settings, I do prefer the traditional approach.