Hi David,
"I think that, in the presence of disagreement by other implementors
working on the same engine, the threshold ought to be based on
whether the feature would realistically be accepted and shipped."
So you are suggesting for a feature to be accepted as a FPWD extension spec in the HTML WG that the above criteria is appropriate, this appears to be a much higher bar than for features included and remaining in the WHAT WG HTML spec currently.
Regards
SteveF
On 15 Oct 2012, at 19:44, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> I think that, in the presence of disagreement by other implementors
> working on the same engine, the threshold ought to be based on
> whether the feature would realistically be accepted and shipped.