Activity

Ranking

Stats

Eye color: blue

Hair color: brown

Height: 5'6"

Weight: 108 lbs

Breasts: medium

Size: 28/26/30

Shaved: shaved

Ethnicity: Caucasian

Bio

I currently study at the institute of arts. I have a good voice and I am professionally engaged in singing. I am very soft spoken and also shy. I love meeting new people but usually they talk to me first. I love being with my friends as they help me to get out from my shell. That is the reason I also enjoy being in front of the camera as it gives me a chance to express something that can be captured and shared.

32 Members commented on Emily Bloom's movie

Does anyone else see the true beauty in Emily? I may be considered weird, but I do look for these things. Emily has a very loving and genuinely caring soul. You can tell a lot about a person by their eyes and Emily's eyes are very deep and just magical. She has a very bright spark. I feel I can say this because I feel what Emily does, the producers do and Met Art does is convey a message through Nude Art, Erotica and Beauty. They try to show how lucky we are to have such beautiful gifts from god and what he has given us to treasure. I don't think anyone could disagree and say that these ladies especially Emily art not so special that it is as if they were created literally by the hands of god, given deep loving souls and placed here for us to treasure. Thank you guys at Met Art for Conveying this and trying to help us see the true beauty these ladies behold.

I like very much the colors in this video by Erik. ♥Emily♥ looks adorable and in my opinion, these are the best kind of Sets/Videos for Her:-) The perfect fairytales Princess:-) And who would not want to be Her Prince? ♥ ♥ ♥

No full nudity. The camera work is atrocious. That makes this video a total epic fucking fail. Please don't let director do another video again. He or she should be fucking fired with extreme prejudice and run out of the business entirely.

This video is so bad, that I wish there were negative scores on MetArt. This is a minus -100, not because of the model but because of the photographer. Listen, Erik Latika, you should download and and watch the video "Mirelle A in Krios" by Rylsky from MetArt. That is how to make a great video. When you watch a video, you do NOT want the camera to get in the way. I completely agree with the first two paragraphs of Dark_Storm's comments below.

All of that flying in and out and twisting back and forth with the camera, along with it constantly going in and out of focus, is some of the worst -- if not THE worst -- camera work I've ever seen. It made me nauseous trying to watch it. Mr. Latika has more energy than sense. Rather than being able to enjoy Emily's beauty, I spent most of the movie trying not to puke. Watching this was worse than being on the pitching and rolling deck of a ship on the high seas amidst a Nor'easter.

Someone, please, buy him a tripod and teach him how to use it.

It also would have been a good idea for Emily to migrate onto the bed rather than repetitively preening in front of the mirror and vanity.

In this case, Mr. Latika felt the need to showcase his shoddy camera "stylings" rather than focusing on making Emily looking good. When the camera work becomes more important than the model, it is no longer MetArt quality, where the models should come first.

Emily's a gorgeous young lady, but those way-too-long fake eyelashes have got to go.

I'm always excited when I see that a new photoset or video of Emily is coming out the next day. What a disappointment! I know the camera motion and blur was supposed to create a dreamy effect, but it just didn't work for me.

Could we just get a normal video of gorgeous Emily slowly stripping out of her sexy lingerie?

(Disclaimer: I've read the comments here for years, but it's taken this video entry to finally get me to sign in and comment.)

Please don't let Erik Latika ruin Emily like he did Milena. He is, hands down, the WORST photographer in the MET universe. His work is purely amateur, often bland and colorless...flat. Milena was an amazingly promising model when she first started...then she started working with Latika and only Latika, and her modeling has suffered from it. (It's as if he's her boyfriend and he'll only let her shoot with him now....) Hopefully Emily, on the other hand, will continue to work with real artists. And also hopefully Latika will not do any more damage to the art of video (I think it's too late to hope that he stops taking photos).

I like to imagine a story to these videos and in this case I imagined Emily as a 19th Century courtesan enticing her lover/client.

That really worked for me.

Also, this seems to be a vid of the photo set, Epoch, over on SexArt. I liked that just as well and for the same reason.Swoopy? I had to watch the vid a second time to see what that was about. I guess I can see it, but I was lost in my courtesan fantasy so I didn't even notice it, and it still doesn't bother me.

The highlights for me were the pretty pink panties, Emily's joyful smile, her hair up in a very pleasing fashion, one (accidental?) jiggle of a breast, and a seldom seen but always appreciated glimpse of some ribs. Alas, Erik kept her tethered to the dresser.

Would one of the technically sharp Members please answer a question. What is it about a good video camera that seems to keep much of a scene in focus? What is stopping that ability from being incorporated into lenses for digital SLRs. Thanks.

Emily looks absolutely stunning, all the way down to her pretty pointed toes. And with particular attention to her naughty smile, astonishingly fine breasts and curvy ass, of course! I agree the motion of the camera is a little much ('swoopy is the perfect word, _fer_realz_!) but can't fault Emily's hotness.

Any day with Emily in it is a good thing, so my Tuesday just got 10X better. And she's wearing her hair up and wearing pretty pink panties... ( : She's looking more womanly than ever, and that is a good thing. Love you, Emily, please come back soon, and often!

Latika's camera technique nearly gave me motion sickness after awhile, I could have stood less swoopiness. And that lovely dressing gown and the sash became a little annoying after awhile also, I would have been happy to have seen it come all the way off about halfway through.

That having been said, I'm glad Emily is still making movies; K, I hope you're buying as many as you can! ( :

Like you, I really like heavily with her hair up so that her very pretty face is not hidden by a cascade of long brown hair. I found the movie rather disappointing and I would like to have seen Emily standing fully naked and pirouetting on those lovely pointy toes. Still, it is always good to see her lovely bum, pretty ass hole and sensational pussy on a cold, dull and overcast Tuesday morning.