World Net Daily today sought to dismiss clear evidence that Pat Tillman
was murdered by attempting to marginalize the issue as a leftist conspiracy
theory and by suggesting Wesley Clark and Keith Olbermann didn't lend
credence to the murder angle - when they clearly did.

The World Net Daily piece firstly fails to address clear indications
that Tillman was murdered, as unveiled by Army medical doctors, that Tillman
was triple tapped with an M16 round to the head from just ten yards and
that the bullet holes were very close together. Medical examiners were
very suspicious and suspected murder, but were blocked from investigating
the angle by higher-ups.

(Article continues below)

The report also stated that no evidence of enemy
fire was found at the scene, calling the explanation of friendly fire
into question.

The
Associated Press story also revealed that "Army attorneys sent
each other congratulatory e-mails for keeping criminal investigators at
bay as the Army conducted an internal friendly-fire investigation that
resulted in administrative, or non-criminal, punishments."

Anyone who considers the new evidence, along with the obvious motivation
for killing Tillman - the fact that he was about to return home and become
an anti-war icon, and rules out the obvious explanation of murder is in
a severe state of denial.

WND scoffs at the notion that Wesley Clark, during an appearance on MSNBC's
Countdown with Keith Olbermann on Thursday night, entertained the notion
that Tillman could have been murdered and that a high level cover-up may
have been at work.

"Clark, however, never even remotely suggested the possibility of
any high-level conspiracy to kill Tillman. In fact, he was questioning
where, in the chain of command, was the decision made to cover up the
truth about what happened to Tillman," states the article.

Anyone who watches the video and reads the transcript can readily ascertain
that the context of Olbermann and Clark's conversation is clearly whether
or not Pat Tillman was murdered and if that was covered up.

"Does it not begin to look more and more like that, that we were
going the wrong direction in this, that they were not trying to protect
something, something slightly negative from coming out, but in fact coming-
protecting the accusation that his mother has made and has not gotten
a lot of attention to that, that perhaps he was indeed murdered?"
Olbermann asks Clark.

"It's very possible," responds Clark.

How World Net Daily can claim the context of this discussion isn't about
the potential cover-up of the fact that Tillman was murdered is baffling.

Olbermann asks Clark if "they" as in the authorities may have
been "protecting something" - "the accusation that....perhaps
he was indeed murdered."

Olbermann is asking Clark if he thinks the authorities may have engaged
in a cover-up to bury the fact that Tillman was murdered and Clark agrees
- "it's very possible."

Perhaps World Net Daily didn't manage to make it to the end of the six
minute You Tube video, because their article completely omits this portion
of the transcript, yet they attack Prison Planet.com for a "misrepresentation"
and a "distortion".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The Internet leader in activist media - Prison
Planet.tv. Get access to hundreds of special video reports,
audio interviews, books and documentary films. Subscribers
also get instant access to our hugely popular forum where you can network
with like-minded people, meet up and get active! Click
here to subscribe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We are somewhat confused by World Net Daily's approach, on the one hand
they routinely put out excellent articles exposing the North American
Union and are attacked for doing so by sectors of the establishment media
and even the Neo-Cons. But on the other hand, they seem to be desperate
to cling on to what is now a dwindling Neo-Con support base by maintaining
support for the occupation of Iraq and sidelining anti-war sentiment as
leftist hot air.