Study: Having An Abortion Does Not Increase Risk of Mental Health Problems, Unwanted Pregnancy Does

See all our coverage of the Administration’s 2011 Emergency Contraception Reversal here.

Last week, the UK Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AMRC), published the world’s largest, most comprehensive and systematic review of mental health outcomes and abortion care. The review included 44 high-quality studies done in developed countries and published between 1990 and 2011.

The conclusion? Having an abortion does not increase the risk of mental health problems. “The best current evidence,” according to the Academy, “suggests that it makes no difference to a woman’s mental health whether she chooses to have an abortion or to continue with the pregnancy.”

A commentary on the study published in the December 17th of the British Medical Journal, The Lancet notes: “Past studies on the effect of an induced abortion on mental health have been mixed in terms of their quality, findings, and interpretation. Some have shown no harm while others have found associations with mental disorders.”

Last week, the world’s largest, on mental health outcomes of abortion was published by the UK Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AMRC). The review claimed to provide a definitive answer: having an abortion does not increase the risk of mental health problems.

According to the Academy’s own statement, the review’s Steering Group and the National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH) at the Royal College of Psychiatrists (NCCMH) “carried out a systematic and comprehensive search of the literature and identified 180 potentially relevant studies published between 1990 and 2011.”

The Steering Group was careful to ensure only the best quality evidence was used, so all studies were subject to multiple quality assessments. In total, 44 papers were included in the review.

On the basis of the best evidence available, the Steering Group concluded that:

Having an unwanted pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of mental health problems. However, the rates of mental health problems for women with an unwanted pregnancy are the same, whether they have an abortion or give birth.

The most reliable predictor of post-abortion mental health problems is having a history of mental health problems. In other words, women who have had mental health problems before the abortion are at greater risk of mental health problems after the abortion.

Some other factors may be associated with increased rates of post-abortion mental health problems, such as a woman having a negative attitude towards abortions in general, being under pressure from her partner to have an abortion, or experiencing other stressful life events.

The Steering Group recommends that future practice and research should focus on supporting all women who have an unwanted pregnancy.

These results, said The Lancet, “should guide care and advice for women with unwanted pregnancies who need mental health support whatever the resolution of their pregnancy.”

Prevention of unwanted pregnancies is also crucial through education and the provision of contraception. But women still face barriers to accessing these services.

Last week, continued The Lancet, “US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius vetoed the Food and Drug Administration’s recommendation to make the emergency contraceptive pill, Plan B, available without prescription to all women of childbearing age in the USA. Plan B will not be available without prescription to girls 16 years or younger under the ruling.”

The AMRC’s findings show that Sebelius’s decision is an assault on the mental health of women as well as their reproductive rights. It should be reversed.

Having an unwanted pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of mental health problems. However, the rates of mental health problems for women with an unwanted pregnancy are the same, whether they have an abortion or give birth.

The pundits that make such a show about concern for mental effects of abortion & not unwanted pregnancy show it’s about finding a reason to pressure women not to be “selfish” rather than making decisions for themselves. Because (the way they want it) the purpose of women is do what other people want them to do.

If they really cared about the Public Good then they wouldn’t just be looking at one sliver, they’d be looking at mental health in general & make mental health budgeting decisions based on science not ideology. & public health & housing & environment, etc.

colleen

Because (the way they want it) the purpose of women is do what other people want them to do.

Ironically the high degree of self loathing and abnegation demanded of women (and only women) from the ‘pro-life’ movement leads to, what are to me at least, obvious mental health issues. The ‘pro-life’ movement reduces the value of women to our sexual and reproductive lives/functions and then tells us this is what God wants and that sacrifice and submission is our true nature. No wonder the Catholic hierarchy is so bitterly opposed to feminists and the feminist movement.

What I want to know is why so many of the female ‘pro-lifers’ have one or no children and yet are perfectly happy to establish careers based on forcing other women to carry every fetus to term. How many children does Lila Rose or the dreadful Kirsten Day have? As far as I can tell…none. And yet both women have lucrative careers devoted to making the lives of women, and particularly poor women, as short and miserable as possible.

beenthere72

Did you mean Kristen Walker? I’m convinced she and Lily are complete frauds. They just want an audience.

colleen

No I meant Kirsten Day. The Executive Director of Democrats for Life.

beenthere72

Ah, thank you. Wasn’t familiar with her and tried googling – there are many Kirsten Days.