City Council votes 8-2 in favour of challenging B.C. government's environmental approval of pipeline expansion

Vancouver residents rallied outside Vancouver City Hall on Feb. 8, 2016, in support of a motion requesting a judicial review of the province's approval of the Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion project. (Jon Hernandez/CBC)

Vancouver city councillors passed a motion Wednesday to request a judicial review of the B.C. Liberal's environmental approval of the controversial Kinder Morgan expansion project.

The motion, introduced by Green Party Councilor Adriane Carr, was passed by an eight-two vote inside Vancouver City Hall after several community speakers highlighted a lack of public consultation from the province. Speakers also maintained that no comprehensive studies have been done to model the damaging effects of a bitumen spill along the B.C. coast.

Carr hopes the court will also recognize these shortcomings and revoke the project's environmental approval.

"At the very minimum, [the judicial review] will slow down the whole process in terms of moving forward with the Kinder Morgan project," she told CBC News. "In the best case scenario it would lead to the province changing its position, and having to say 'no' to Kinder Morgan — and that would be a real win."

Vancouver city councillor Adriane Carr maintains the province didn't do its due diligence when authorizing an environmental permit for the Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion project. (Jon Hernandez/CBC)

Lawyers from the City of Vancouver will now petition the Supreme Court of B.C. to move forward with the review. If the court decides to do so, it will assess whether the provincial government acted appropriately in granting Kinder Morgan environmental approval.

If a judge decides that a more rigorous environmental assessment is needed, the province could be ordered to conduct more research on the effects of a potential bitumen spill, says Carr,

"It's my firm belief that [further research] would point to the decision to say 'no' to Kinder Morgan," she said.

Legal precedent

The provincial government approved the twinned pipeline project last month after Premier Christy Clark said all five conditions for support had been met, which includes a 'world-class' spill response strategy and consultation with First Nations.

And this isn't the first time the province has run into trouble by deferring an assessment to the feds.

Demonstrators protest on the streets of Vancouver in June 2014 following the federal government's approval of the Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline. (Reuters)

In January 2016, the B.C. Supreme Court ruled that the province had to conduct its own environmental assessment for the Northern Gateway Pipeline after the project was approved by the federal government.

Government responds

But the provincial government says they have held up their end of their end of the bargain for a project that will protect the province's environmental and economic interests.

"We conducted consultation with First Nations as ordered by the B.C. Supreme Court, and added an additional 37 legally-binding conditions that are in addition to, and designed to supplement, the 157 conditions required by the National Energy Board," said the Ministry of Environment in a written statement to CBC News.

The ministry says the province is expected to receive over $1 billion in investments from Kinder Morgan over the next 20 years, as well as a $1.5 billion investment from the federal government for a world-class marine spill response.