CBS: House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., with new details about the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. This interview is with Darrell Issa (whom I don’t like) and news anchor Bob Sheiffer (which I don’t like). In this video/audio, Issa makes clear tyhat the Benghazi attack was a terrorist attack and not from a video that some fool made. The attack was on the 911 anniversary.

In the video/audio below, we see and hear fellow Obamabots running away from Obama on the Benghazi issues and then the Syrian issue. Didn’t Obama “draw the red line on Syria” already? And his fellow compatriots are running away?

Amazing.

Running away as ALL libtards do…especially when their careers are at stake.

I love this woman and no, I don’t want to marry her. Please. I have read many comments about this woman and people out there want to marry her. HINT: she is already married for crying out loud.

In her recent outing at the NRA-ILA meeting in Houston, TX, Judge Pirro made a speech of approximately 15 minutes and this speech she gave was very accurate and very good. (I will be playing this audio at my next BTR show this next Monday.)

Fox News host Jeanine Pirro addresses the crowd at the NRA-ILA Leadership Forum, an event of the 2013 NRA Annual Meetings in Houston, Texas. Pirro, who was a victim of the Journal News interactive gun owner map, criticizes the media for attempting to demonize gun owners. “You [do] not blame all gun owners for the actions of a few,” says Pirro.

Most of these “few” in numbers of gun attacks are DEMOCRATS. Get over it.

This is the END of the fence separating the USA with Mexico…BTW, that’s my rifle.As incredible as this seems to be, this is what the marxist-sociopaths are up to. They MUST have these “new voters” because they have KILLED millions of our voter base via the blood sacrifices to Satan, via abortion.

He has gone to Mexico to make a speech on immigration reform, which in his world is amnesty. Ostensibly his goal is to go down there and tell them, “You guys gotta your economy up here so that my people in America are not as threatened by immigration. You gotta make it look like people will not want to leave your country. (whispering) When in fact I want as many of your countrymen as I can! I’m gonna need ‘em as voters, my party will.”

AP: “Though the role played by Latino voters in last year’s US presidential election gets much credit for the current momentum for changing immigration laws and providing a path to citizenship for 11 million immigrants in the US illegally, another reason for the change in attitudes is that stronger border protections and the recession have been disincentives to cross into the US. As a result, illegal immigration has declined,” and we can’t have that! Obama has gone to Mexico to ratchet up immigration, essentially.

This is incredible. The Dems across this land are doing whatever they can to kill all gun holders rights everywhere. This particular case is in the state of Illinois. Get ready. The socialists, the socialist-marxist are coming your way.

There are two Supreme Court rulings that directly relate to the current anti-Assault Weapon issue everyone needs to be reminded of.

The first is United States v. Miller 1939. Miller possessed a sawed-off shotgun banned under the National Firearms Act. He argued that he had a right to bear the weapon under the Second Amendment, but the Supreme Court ruled against him. Why? At the time, sawed-off shotguns were not being used in a military application, and the Supremes ruled that since it didn’t, it was not protected. Even though Miller lost that argument, the Miller case set the precedent that protected firearms have a military, and thus a legitimate and protected Militia use. The military now uses shotguns regularly, but not very short, sawed-off shotguns, but an AR-15/AK-47 type weapon is currently in use by the military, therefore it is a protected weapon for the Unorganized Militia, which includes just about every American citizen now that both age and sex discrimination are illegal. (The original Militia included men of age 17-45) Therefore any firearm that is applicable to military use is clearly protected under Article II, and that includes all those nasty-looking semi-automatic black rifles, including full 30 round magazines.

The second important case is that of John Bad Elk v. United States from 1900. In that case, an attempt was made to arrest Mr. Bad Elk without probable cause, and Mr. Bad Elk killed a policeman who was attempting the false arrest. Bad Elk had been found guilty and sentenced to death. However, the Supreme Court ruled that Bad Elk had the right to use any force, including lethal force, to prevent his false arrest, even if the policeman was only trying to arrest him and not kill him. Basically, the Supremes of the day ruled that as a citizen, you have the right to defend against your civil rights being violated using ANY force necessary to prevent the violation, even if the offending party isn’t trying to kill you.

Both of these cases are standing law to this day.

The Miller decision clearly includes AR-15/AK-47 type weapons as having a military application. The Bad Elk decision means that if the government tries to confiscate your AR-15/AK-47, or arrest you for having one, you can kill the offenders on the spot, even if they are not trying to kill you.

I didn’t make these decisions; the United States Supreme Court did.

Carl F. Worden

Scroll uo to the 4:30 mark to watch this Jihadi scum bag RANT for almost 15 minutes on ITS failure to screw Americans from their Second Amendment Rights.

Resign, butthead. You are NOT welcome to live in my country, you Muzzie Bro hammerhead.

You are free to share, to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix, to adapt the work under the following conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.
''