If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday.

Kucinich, who wanted to bring impeachment articles against both former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney over Iraq ó only to be blocked by his own leadership ó asked why the U.S. missile strikes arenít impeachable offenses.

Kucinich also questioned why Democratic leaders didnít object when President Barack Obama told them of his plan for American participation in enforcing the Libyan no-fly zone during a White House Situation Room meeting on Friday, sources told POLITICO.

yes...doesn't mean that any of it was Constitutional, and thus why I said ALL Presidents that have used it.

And so you believe that the Founding fathers who sat in congress and on the Supreme court during Washington's tenure in office - the same men who wrote the constitution were wrong in being supportive of Washington? Don't you think it's a bit arrogant to say that you know the document better than the men who actual wrote it?

And so you believe that the Founding fathers who sat in congress and on the Supreme court during Washington's tenure in office - the same men who wrote the constitution were wrong in being supportive of Washington? Don't you think it's a bit arrogant to say that you know the document better than the men who actual wrote it?