Around 1970, as a young intern working in a large teaching hospital
in Texas, I became involved in what was euphemistically called "an interesting
case." Steeped in analytic training and taught to interpret most utterances
from patients as metaphors for the intrapsychic life, I enthusiastically
engaged myself in the case of Mary and Hal. Mary, I was told, was a young
woman who was clearly hallucinating and delusional. Hal was her imaginary
friend, "part of her delusional system," I was told. " See her in analytic
treatment four times a week, and see if you can help her differentiate
her visions from reality," my supervisor directed. And so it began, with
all the fervor of a young clinician, thinking to herself that this was
a clear-cut "teaching case" and I might learn something about schizophrenia.
Until, that is, upon listening to Mary as she began to tell me about Hal.
"What is he like," I asked innocently. "Oh," she said, "he is very strong
and quite big. The neighbors don’t like him because he frightens them."
As I was to learn as the case unfolded, the neighbors had every cause to
be fearful of the 600-pound gorilla actually living in Mary’s basement!

All this is simply to say that dealing with dreams and visions and
reality can be complicated and tricky business.

Introduction—Your Mission

Spiritlinking is the deliberate and untiring act of working through
resistance to organizational transformation by building the circle of
friends, fostering networks ofhuman compassion and interweaving
teams of relationships through which new ideas are born and new
ways of responding to the mission take form and find expression. In
some meager attempt to find a way to describe how we might counter the
pull toward the disconnection, self-serving individualism and cynicism
that are sad hallmarks of this dawn of the postmodern era, I coined the
word "spiritlinking." It speaks to the desire to search together for truth,
meaning, and community—directed toward the realization of the mission of
the gospel.

I will be examining with you some of the more challenging parts of the
mission. That is, the part that moves the mission and the visions off the
paper and into expression. So often, in working with organizations that
have formulated wonderful statements of mission, I have found that they
are bogged down, overwhelmed, even paralyzed, when it comes to taking the
kind of innovative action necessary to ensure future institutional viability.
Obviously, you have done much over the centuries to meet the needs of a
changing world and to prepare the students who are part of it. But as we
stand poised at the edge of this postmodern time, there are new challenges
that are confronting us. Specifically, common wisdom purports that organizations
and institutions will flourish in direct proportion to the extent they
have been able to establish strong networking, relational bonds,
and communities of meaning and hope throughout their spheres of
influence.

To set the stage for our work this morning, I would first like to reflect
back to you some of what I have studied about your mission, especially
in the context of higher education in the Jesuit tradition. I would hasten
to add that it is, indeed, a strong foundation for what awaits us in the
immediate years to come.

Through your commitment as educators, students and leaders in the field
of Jesuit education, you hold enormous potential to contribute to the sacred
task of healing a world that suffers from demoralization, struggles with
injustice, and wrestles with unbelief. You are no strangers to the significance
of this mission. In his recent letter to the Jesuits, Father Peter-Hans
Kolvenbach, Superior General, highlighted well the context in which we
find ourselves today: "The times are marked by unforeseeable and very rapid
socio-cultural changes," he states, "not easy to read and even harder to
respond to effectively (e.g., globalization, the excesses of the market
economy, drug traffic and corruption, mass migration, ecological degradation,
outbreaks of brutal violence). Formerly inspiring visions of society and
broad strategies for structural change have ceded to skepticism or a preference,
at best, for more modest projects and restricted approaches…Such a process
of erosion would inevitably reduce our mission today…"

Perhaps the greatest tragedy that could occur with your universities
would be to allow such erosion to occur. As participants in communities
of truth, you have articulated a powerful mission, punctuated by visions
and dreams, hopes and inspiration. Here is a sampling of what you say to
those who are looking for wisdom and knowledge:

We are committed to "develop a new generation of leaders who possess
a love for truth, the critical intelligence to pursue it, and the eloquence
to articulate it…A university is a community of teachers and learners."
(Loyola
University, New Orleans)

We strive to exercise "concern for the dignity of the person and for
the common good of the world community…", (University of
Detroit Mercy)

to be "a community that truly nurtures learning for the body, mind
and spirit, a place where people take the time and make the effort to teach
and act with care, and in the service of justice, with others…" (Spring
Hill College).

The university "exists to preserve, extend and transmit knowledge and
to deepen the understanding of the human person, the universe and God.
[It] values freedom of inquiry, the pursuit of truth and care for others,
especially the young, the poor and the sick…

preparing students to understand and to serve the needs and aspirations
of the world community." (Loyola University, Chicago)

It is "dedicated to the pursuit of truth in all its forms and guided
by the living tradition of the Catholic Church. The inalienable worth of
each individual and appreciation of ethnic and cultural diversity are core
values." (Creighton University)

The university is directed toward "the search for truth, the discovery
and sharing of knowledge, the fostering of personal and professional excellence,
the promotion of a life of faith, and the development of leadership expressed
in service to others." (Marquette University)

The university is committed to "the pursuit of truth for the greater
glory of God and for the service of humanity...[and] nurtures within its
community an understanding of and commitment to the faith that does justice."
(St.
Louis University)

The university is "a learning community…involved in the life and growth
of the city and region, and committed to the service of the contemporary
world…a strong voice for the good of the community." (Rockhurst
University)

It is "committed to the transmission and extension of the treasury
of human knowledge." (John Carroll University)

"We encourage the continual search for truth, values, and a just existence.
Throughout this process, we examine and attempt to answer the fundamental
question, ‘How ought we to live?’" (Regis University)

And, finally, the Jesuit university knows it has done its job when
the student can say, "I know I am intellectually, morally and spiritually
prepared to take my place in a rapidly changing global society and to have
a positive impact on that society—to live a life beyond myself for other
people." (Xavier University)

The Challenge

These are stirring and poignant expressions of groups of extraordinarily
dedicated people who exhibit a passion to make this world a better place
for subsequent generations. As I reflected on your documents, I noted several
themes that permeated your texts and seem to touch upon the heart of your
tradition:

The imperative toward community

The preparation of leaders

The pursuit of truth and knowledge

The promotion of a just existence, with sensitivity to the young
and the vulnerable

The development of a life of faith that does justice.

You have much about which to be proud. But you also have an enormous
challenge:
How will you enflesh this mission in your institutions at the dawn of this
postmodern time? What more must you do as institutions of higher learning
to build communities that counteract the pull toward individualism and
self-focused greed? How are the next generation of leaders to be prepared
to shepherd the businesses, the churches and health care institutions of
the future in faith and with compassion—especially in the midst of a society
that questions the veracity of authority? How will your schools underscore
the excitement of pursuing truth in a world plagued by disbelief? How will
your universities instill a profound sense of justice in the young—all
the while living in the midst of a society so often blinded to the sickened,
the abandoned, and the dispensable poor? How can the faith of the next
generation be sustained in this world so permeated by cynicism and despair?
These questions arise in me from your statements of mission and vision.

And, I am relatively certain, there are times when you, like I, am tempted
to say, "So those are beautiful words in those mission statements, great
exercises in creative writing. And this is just another one of those presentations—but
really nothing very different is really going to happen. We’ve talked this
talk before…" And thus we, too, can find ourselves sadly seduced by the
skepticism and tantalizing disparagement that surround us.

The mission is compelling—but so are the tasks that face us all. We
stand on the edge of taking the plunge toward monumental transformative
change. The ways many of us have been accustomed to teaching and learning
in the past are no longer adequate to address the needs of the postmodern
young adult. As a result of technological advances, social and economic
conditions, family environment, to name but a few factors, the young think
differently than we do. Nothing perhaps points that out to me more than
when I sit with my 14 year old nephew who can solve my computer glitches
with record speed and accuracy, saying to me, "But Aunt Donna, it’s sooooo
simple!" They have actually developed conceptual patterns that are foreign
to many of us. You know that far better than I. Consequently, our educational
strategies must respond in new ways to meet a different reality. In what
ways can mission be concretized in response to the needs of today’s young?

I am reminded of the somewhat foreboding words penned probably 10 years
or more ago by the Episcopal priest, Harrison Owen: Transformative change
is the institutional "search for a better way to be. It is what happens
when the old ways of doing business are no longer appropriate or adequate
[to meet the needs of today] and a new way becomes essential…. The alternative
is extinction."

Realizing
the mission in today’s world entails being willing to instigate to organizational
conversion. And we all know that conversion-talk is painful because
it leads to the relinquishment of what has historically been held dear,
familiar, and often quite successful. This is precisely why so many institutions
engage in visioning exercises, and the visions never leave the paper on
which they were written. It’s the classic: "On your mark. Get set. (stop)"
And the visions and dreams are shelved somewhere, never to taunt us again
with the prospect of really having to engage ourselves in the uncomfortable
process of transformative change.

There is an interesting body of organizational research that highlights
the difficulties of some organizations to embrace change in response to
the needs of the day. Basically, what was discovered was those organizations
exhibiting the greatest difficulty conceptualizing and instituting new
ways of actualizing their mission in response to changing times are those
that have had a very successful past. That is, those institutions
that have wonderful track records are likely the very ones that will be
the most resistant to change. Conversion is far less attractive to us when
we feel comfortable basking on the histories of our accomplishments. The
catch in all of this is that our successful organizational behaviors of
the past are not going to hold us as we walk into this unfolding postmodern
era.

And the stakes are quite high for society as a whole if our most successful
and treasured institutions place themselves at risk. For example, it would
be a tragic loss for the church, for the future of the next generations,
if Jesuit institutions of learning were to inure themselves to emergent
needs of today’s young, and continue to engage in methods of education
and administration that worked superbly well 20, 30 or more years ago.

Transformative change never happens for its own sake. Change for change’s
sake is foolhardy. Transformation happens when an institution listens carefully
to the crying needs of the day and determines that it must design new ways
of going about business so that it can remain faithful to the mission.
Let me share with you a personal example:

In the early 1970’s, the University of Detroit graduate program in clinical
psychology prepared me in the delivery of psychoanalytically-oriented therapy,
with the expectation that, as a Catholic sister, I would be prepared to
respond to the emotionally fragmented and tormented people in the Detroit
community. I was trained to be skeptical of the "medical model", to count
on the fact that psychotherapy, expertly practiced, would obviate the need
for psychotropic medication, and that the only really efficacious
model of treatment was analysis. That was the ’70’s. But times changed—and
so did psychological training. Had UDM continued rigidly to promote that
model, largely an adversarial and highly circumscribed approach, Detroiters
(and others) of the 90’s and the 2000’s would not be well served; the graduates
would likely find it difficult to find employment; and the clinical program
would likely fail to meet standards of acceptable clinical training and
practice. Simply put, resistance to change would lead eventually to an
erosion of the mission and, ultimately, to extinction. Clearly, that did
not happen.

It is no accident that your mission statements so clearly reflect the
vital needs of the day—the need for community, for relatedness,
for connection. They point toward the significance of the ongoing
search for truth, justice, spirituality and meaning. These
values are precisely the values that we hear about repeatedly as the central
determinants of our ability to survive in this rapidly changing and tumultuous
world of ours. They reflect deeply-held values of the Society of Jesus.

But
the ways of addressing those needs today necessarily differ from the ways
those needs have been addressed yesterday. If professors still teach the
same way they taught 5 years ago, if administrators still conceptualize
their institutions’ relationships with their local communities in the same
way they were last year, if departments were to continue to be in competitive,
territorial and isolative stances toward one another, we would be looking
at moribund departments and dying institutions. And what a loss that would
be for the church and for the world.

The challenge of this time in history is obviously to develop ways of
establishing interconnection and relationships throughout those institutions
of which we are a part.

The Imperative toward Community

We are all aware, through the shared wisdom and scholarship of the interdisciplinary
academy, that one of the most critical predictors of our viability as members
of this global society is the extent to which we will be able to establish
sustainable
communities. This must under gird the ways in which we administer,
teach, pray, and live as members of this century. And it will necessitate
changing some familiar patterns. I would invite you to take a few moments
to reflect on your experience of community as it is lived out in your university
context:

Change that is truly transformative may lead to the abandonment of all
that has been previously experienced as comfortable and familiar. It necessarily
entails letting go and grieving—not because previous ways of addressing
the mission were wrong or unsuccessful, but because the needs of these
times necessitate new ways of addressing the mission. Transformative
change beckons toward the unknown. It is uncomfortable, sometimes frightening,
and always met with resistance.

Spiritlinkingcalls us to risk engaging more directly with one
another, regardless of role; to witness to the possibility of learning
from one another in communities of truth; to bridge the disconnections
that surround us and keep us alienated from one another. It will undoubtedly
lead us toward confrontation with those who hold different perspectives,
values, and opinions. Yet, this is precisely the witness and the enormous
sign of hope that your institutions of Jesuit higher education can offer
to the world today. It is a call to fashion learning communities founded
on the pursuit of truth, learning communities that will incubate the leaders
of the future – and it is a challenge that will be met with massive resistance.

So what can be done so that the people continue to be served, the gospel
continues to be proclaimed, in this unfolding era? How will you ensure
that resistance to the formation of transformative communities of truth
does not silence your mission?

Helping the Visions and Dreams to be Realized

As leaders in the learning community, whether in a formal or an informal
role of leadership, you are in a unique position to bring dreams to reality.
In order to do that, however, you must be alerted to signs of resistance
both in yourself and in the groups with which you are working. Several
forms of resistance come to mind when I think about what can happen in
our successfully sponsored institutions: denial of the need to change;
malaise and low morale demonstrated in administrative, departmental, classroom
and board apathy; divisiveness and destructive coalition-building that
serve to destroy a sense of the common good; fear leading to institutional
paralysis and demonstrated by a series of behaviors I refer to as "doing
and undoing". No decision can be definitively made because of a fear of
making a wrong decision, so as soon as a direction is articulated, the
"re-visitation" begins and no timely action is undertaken. And, lastly,
a wonderful way of offsetting the possibility for organizational transformation
is by destroying the people who are going to lead the effort.

One of the important tasks of leadership in the process of bringing
visions and dreams to reality is to be able to identify behaviors, such
as these, that will stop the process from continuing. Being alert to resistances
that can thwart constructive change on behalf of the mission is a skill
that we can all develop. Typically, intractable resistance to change has
resulted in the demise of more than a few institutions. Why? Because it
smothered opportunities for community-building, collaboration, and hopefulness.
Being aware of the predicable occurrence of resistances when a group is
trying to bring forth the new, the leader is able to facilitate the exploration
of the underlying fears that hold the group back from taking action.

Leadership Skills Necessary to Make It Happen

For those of you who will take up the exciting challenge to help your
universities bring wonderful visions to expression in service to the next
generation, certain skills are requisites. First of all, leaders must be
excellent conversationalists, able and eager to engage in dialogue in many
different spheres of influence, surfacing differences, exploring conflict,
nondefensively managing diverse viewpoints—as all of this is held up to
the standard of realizing the mission. Conversation binds people and is
a means of unifying the institution around its mission. There can be no
room for silence or the prohibition of discussion if transformative community
is to be fostered or reclaimed. Persons who cannot tolerate the discomfort
of contentious interchange should not be leaders today.

Community, as it is lived out in the gospel-driven post-modern institution
emphasizes relationships between and among all persons, regardless of status
or position. It is built upon conversation and spirited interchange.

Perhaps most significantly, leaders must be committed to continuous
learning. Studying, reflecting on our contemporary experience broadens
our response-base. Leaders must be able to respond in a variety of ways,
dependent upon the demands of a panoply of tasks confronting the institution
today. One interventional style is insufficient to carry across all situations.
For example, there are times when, in order to reinforce the cohesiveness
of the learning community, the leader surfaces differing perspectives and
manages conflict. At other times, when the community is threatened by fragmentation,
truth-telling and consensus-building are called for. And sometimes, in
response to critical, time-bound situations, it is imperative that crisis
intervention strategies come to the forefront.

Flexibility and the astute assessment of the institutional culture at
any given moment is another hallmark of an effective leader. On the other
hand, leaders whose personal need to be liked supercedes their commitment
to collaboration and networking will not be able to move their learning
communities forward successfully in this postmodern time. Again, they will
not be successful leaders today. Nor will leaders who remain entrenched
in rigidly learned response styles. Obviously, this is no time for the
"but we have always done it this way" or "tradition has been that…" defense
against changing.

As we began this morning, the task of moving visions to reality is a
complex task. But it is also an exciting one that has far reaching implications
for our global sustainability. The commitment to truth seeking, community
formation, and the development of the spirituality of the young leaders
of tomorrow is, indeed, sacred work. My hope and prayer for you is that
you will never allow yourselves to become entrapped in malaise or lulled
into the complacency that would prevent the rest of us from benefitting
from the treasure Jesuit education is for the church and world.