Then She Lied. Isn't That Misconduct?

"Even though the warden said they had never seen such horrific injuries and asked for photos, he later told me the case was closed."

I'd really like to know his name too. Because I bet they crop up again.

A police spokesman said: "An investigation is ongoing and we are trying to identify the owner of the animal that bit the victim's dog. We will able to assess whether any offences have been committed under the Dangerous Dogs Act."

Loosely translated, this means: "Oh, damn! She went to the papers! OKm churn out some boilerplate stuff so it looks like we're doing something.."

No excuse Jaded, not when us lowly members of the public can't rely on ignorance as a defence. How can the law be upheld if the person doing it doesn't know the law? In my experience you get your details taken "just for my notes", and then you get a visit later after they have gone away to ask someone who knows what they are doing.