In 26 yrs we have prolly EQUALLY waterproofed block and poured walls,IMO depends on the builder(his laborers),kind of soil built on and compaction of the soil,proper width and depth for footing,and backfilling against the walls. If I was building a new home I would use a very thick TAR on the walls & place visqueen over the tar AND backfill with 100% peastone...from the footing up to within 6 inches of the grade.The damp-proofing means used now hardly amounts to much and the way the walls are backfilled can cause any wall to crack(by pushing heavy soil,broken-cracked bricks,blocks,roots,and other garbage against newly built walls with heavy equipment). And it wouldn`t hurt on poured walls to fill-completely pack rod holes with hydraulic cement and to put hydr cement cove along the isolation joints before applying thick tar. Sometimes there are small imperfections(openings)along those joints( where footing and wall meet on the outside) and unlike a block wall where there is a cove applied,poured walls have no cove applied along that joint...gl!

What about Superior Wall - precast foundations. We are building a new high end home near a river inlet in Red Bank NJ. Basement floor will be 5 to 10 feet above water table, good drainage away from house. My main concern is the Builder want to use Precast because it's cheaper and he doesn't have to wait for concrete guys. (current wait time is 3 to 6 months) I'm unsure about reliability and durability, cost generally not a problem within reason.