Welcome to Medical News Today

Healthline Media, Inc. would like to process and share personal data (e.g., mobile ad id) and data about your use of our site (e.g., content interests) with our third party partners (see a current list) using cookies and similar automatic collection tools in order to a) personalize content and/or offers on our site or other sites, b) communicate with you upon request, and/or c) for additional reasons upon notice and, when applicable, with your consent.

Healthline Media, Inc. is based in and operates this site from the United States. Any data you provide will be primarily stored and processed in the United States, pursuant to the laws of the United States, which may provide lesser privacy protections than European Economic Area countries.

By clicking “accept” below, you acknowledge and grant your consent for these activities unless and until you withdraw your consent using our rights request form. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.

Please accept our privacy terms

We use cookies and similar technologies to improve your browsing experience, personalize content and offers, show targeted ads, analyze traffic, and better understand you. We may share your information with third-party partners for marketing purposes. To learn more and make choices about data use, visit our Advertising Policy and Privacy Policy. By clicking “Accept and Continue” below, (1) you consent to these activities unless and until you withdraw your consent using our rights request form, and (2) you consent to allow your data to be transferred, processed, and stored in the United States.

Register for a free account

New evidence for roots of dyslexia, study

Published
Monday 30 May 2005 Published Mon 30 May 2005

Adapted Media Release

Addressing a persistent debate in the field of dyslexia research, scientists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and
the University of Southern California (USC) have disproved the popular theory that deficits in certain visual processes cause
the spelling and reading woes commonly suffered by dyslexics.

Rather, a more general problem in basic sensory perception may be at the root of the learning disorder, the scientists report
today (May 29, 2005) in the journal Nature Neuroscience. The work suggests new ways to identify dyslexics and to assess the
many unevaluated techniques teachers use to help dyslexics in the classroom.

Misfiring neurons perhaps make it difficult for dyslexics to pick out relevant visual and auditory cues from the expanse of
surrounding sounds and patterns, or "noise"; it is this inability that may bear heavily on how easily a child can read, says
lead author Anne Sperling, who conducted the research as a USC graduate student, alongside co-author Mark Seidenberg, a
UW-Madison psychology professor who left USC in 2001.

"We really want to understand what is going on at the neurological level that's leading to reading problems," says Sperling.
"[We think] that if a child has a hard time ignoring 'noise,' it could distort speech perception and complicate [the
recognition] of sound segments, which is essential for learning how to read."

A learning disorder with neurological underpinnings, dyslexia affects between 5 to 10 percent of children in the U.S.
Sperling calls the condition a "spiraling problem" because poor reading interferes with many types of learning.

Researchers first proposed during the 1920s that dyslexic children sometimes spell words backwards because they have trouble
seeing straight. Five decades later, that idea out of favor as researchers increasingly believed that dyslexic reading
problems are directly linked to the inability to blend phonemes, or the component sounds in any word.

A child needs to understand that spoken words consists of such sounds--that "bat" for example, includes three sounds ("buh,"
"aah" and "tuh") while the word "splat" has five. The knowledge makes it easier to learn how to pronounce letters, explains
Seidenberg.

"For some reason [dyslexic children] are not developing knowledge of phonemes," says Seidenberg. "This has little impact on
their spoken language, but really interferes with learning to read."

Scientists have long tried to understand why dyslexics stumble with phonemes. With recent advances in the understanding of
the brain and visual processes, dyslexia researchers again turned in the 1990s to vision as the likely root of the learning
disorder. In particular they focused on the magnocellular (M) pathway, one of two visual pathways in the brain that processes
motion and brightness. The other visual channel, the parvocellular (P) pathway, processes detail and color.

Some studies implicated an impaired M channel, showing that dyslexic children have trouble seeing rapidly changing or moving
stimuli. But the findings have not been readily replicated and there was little consensus among experts, says Sperling. "We
wanted to know decisively once and for all whether it is the M pathway or not," she says.

Devising a new approach, Sperling gathered 28 dyslexic and 27 non-dyslexic children, and showed them a pattern on a computer
screen showing alternating light and dark bars. One type of pattern, with thick, rapidly flickering bars, targeted study
participants' M pathways. The other type of pattern, with thinner non-flickering bars activated participants' P pathways. The
patterns appeared either on the left or right side of the screen, and the children's task was to indicate which side they saw
them.

When only the patterns appeared, the dyslexic children were as able as their peers to pick out both the M and P displays. But
when Sperling partially obscured the patterns with patches of "noise," or television static-like bright and dark spots, the
dyslexic children struggled to isolate both M and P patterns.

The work confirms that problems with "ignoring noise" play a more central role in the onset of dyslexia than the M and P
pathways, Sperling says. An immediate classroom application, she suggests, could be for teachers to "accentuate differences
between sounds, showing the extremes to help [dyslexic children] build categories."

Future studies should examine additional sensory systems, Seidenberg adds, to see if the noise idea holds for all senses and
to seek connections between auditory and visual processes in dyslexia.

2018 Healthline Media UK Ltd. All rights reserved. MNT is the registered trade mark of Healthline Media. Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a healthcare professional.