Gaming Guru

When Low Payoffs for Bets that Overcome High Odds Aren't Bad

Sophisticated gamblers know that if the odds against winning a wager are
"x-to-1," an "x-to-1" payoff would make the bet "fair" -- no advantage for
either the house or the player. A lower relative payoff would give the
casino an edge. A higher payoff would tip the balance toward the bettor.

A few examples will show the idea. At double-zero roulette, the odds
against winning a bet on a single spot are 37-to-1 while the payoff is
35-to-1. Place the four at craps for $10, to win $18; you're bucking
2-to-1 odds for an 1.8-to-1 payoff. Take insurance when you have a
blackjack and the dealer has ace-up; you're a 2.25-to-1 underdog for a
return of 2-to-1.

In these cases, the payoffs are lower than the odds against winning,
giving the house an edge. The disparities may seem minor. In fact, few
players are aware of -- let alone notice -- them. Yet the edges they
engender are relatively steep (5.26 percent at roulette, 6.66 percent on
the four at craps, and 7.69 percent on the insurance bet at blackjack).
Were the odds-payoff gap much larger, the house advantage would be so
outrageous that solid citizens couldn't leave the casino with money in
their fanny packs except by lottery-scale strokes of luck.

Games
with "payoff schedules," in which the same bet can win different amounts
depending on the outcome, are more complicated. They're accordingly
tougher to assess intuitively with respect to edge, and may leave
players thinking they're being short-changed.

The jackpot for a royal on a jacks-or-better video poker machine offers
a good model. The odds against making a royal are about 40,000-to-1. But
the payoff with the maximum number of coins bet is only 800-to-1.
Likewise, the odds against three-of-a-kind at three-card poker are
424-to-1 while the payoff on the pair-plus bet is only 30-to-1. Yet,
house advantage on "9/6" video poker with no bonuses is 0.5 percent and
that on the pair-plus bet at three-card poker is 2.3 percent -- both of
which compare quite favorably to the edge on the win-lose bets mentioned
previously.

To understand how odds on bets with multiple possible payoffs work,
pretend there's a game at which you can lose on a skunk or win at one of
three levels: raccoon, deer, or elk. Probabilities, odds, and payoffs of
the various results for one implementation are shown in the accompanying
list. The "expectation" for each result is the amount lost or won per
dollar bet, multiplied by the probability. Get the overall expectation
for the game by adding the individual components. For this situation,
the sum is zero, meaning that players should average $0.64 in wins for
every $0.64 lost. This is accordingly a fair game, neither the casino
nor the bevy of bettors making a profit in the long run.

Statistical Characteristics of HypotheticalThree-Level Game

result

probability

odds

payoff

expectation

skunk

64%

-0.64

raccoon

25%

3-to-1

1-to-1

+0.25

deer

10%

9-to-1

3-to-1

+0.30

elk

1%

99-to-1

9-to-1

+0.09

Although the payoffs at each level are way below the odds against the
results, they don't stand on their own but are parts of the total
expectation. That is, a 9-to-1 payoff for a 99-to-1 shot at a elk only
represents an expectation of $0.09 per dollar. But it's added to the
$0.30 and $0.25 for deer and raccoon to yield $0.64. And this sum
cancels the $0.64 expected loss on skunk.

Contrast this with a game omitting the raccoon and deer, players still
having 1 percent chance of winning on a elk but the full complementary
99 percent chance of losing on the skunk. The odds against winning are
99-to-1. Assume the payoff is 99-to-1. As for expectation, this is a 99
percent chance of losing multiplied by $1 or -$0.99, and 1 percent
chance of winning times $99 or +$0.99. The total comes to zero, as it
should in a fair game.

Now you know why, when bets can win various amounts depending on the
result of a round, house edge can remain reasonable even though payoffs
at each level are far less than the odds of the outcome in question.
It's as the poet, Sumner A Ingmark, wrote:

Casino City is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control.
Warning: You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a
Casino or placing a wager. There are hundreds of jurisdictions in the world with Internet access and
hundreds of different games and gambling opportunities available on the Internet.
YOU are responsible for determining if it is legal for YOU to play any particular games or place any
particular wager.