Stock E92 M3 DCT - 93 octane - MS filter 351WHP/262WTQ Dynapack

Today I dynoed my car to baseline before the tuning and modifications being.

-2009 M3 DCT, 9200 miles
-93 octane, none of this cali 91 BS
-100 degree shop temp.
-No trickery, straight up gear ratios input along with final drive for DCT. Tried 3rd and 4th with same results. Ended up sticking with 3rd. Oil temp climbed a little too high with 4th pulls with no realfan.
-Installed RPi scoops on the dyno with a low speed 10mph fan and got a 3whp gain. ended up with 354 whp - graph for that coming soon.
-Hotlapped the car with no fans 4 times and barely lost ANY whp (2-3whp variance)

The baseline graph red is from disabling ABS but NOT enabling dyno mode, the car made $#@! power. You need to trip the airbag light by driving at 1500-2k rpms for a few minutes. It appears the car does not go full throttle or full power, as the curve is the same but the car sounds and feel different, like 60% throttle.

I think on a DD with correction it has been done but what about outside of that?

I have not seen dynojet results, I've seen it on a dyno dynamics, dynapak (which I'm using)

With 70whp gains in delta between stock and tuned +bolt ons seen on the G dyno with bolt ons (300whp-370whp), and my baseline pretty much being in the 355 range, you don't think it will touch 400 bolted on?

351whp, and 262wtq seem pretty impressive. Doesnt that motor make 295tq at the motor? Good luck with the future mods. Look foward to seeing what you end up with power wise. You maybe better off just going with a sc since other mods will end up to maybe what an sc kit costs. As before good luck either way.

351whp, and 262wtq seem pretty impressive. Doesnt that motor make 295tq at the motor? Good luck with the future mods. Look foward to seeing what you end up with power wise. You maybe better off just going with a sc since other mods will end up to maybe what an sc kit costs. As before good luck either way.

I'm going to dyno and do this in stages, same dyno, and same operator (me). So it will be a slow process. Next week I am going to install the exhaust and apply the base tune. Then Pulley/cat delete. I am trying to do the cat delete last.

I'm going to dyno and do this in stages, same dyno, and same operator (me). So it will be a slow process. Next week I am going to install the exhaust and apply the base tune. Then Pulley/cat delete. I am trying to do the cat delete last.

I have not seen dynojet results, I've seen it on a dyno dynamics, dynapak (which I'm using)

With 70whp gains in delta between stock and tuned +bolt ons seen on the G dyno with bolt ons (300whp-370whp), and my baseline pretty much being in the 355 range, you don't think it will touch 400 bolted on?

We'll have to see?

The baseline is fine I just have not seen a 400 whp dynojet run with bolt on's on pump.

These motors realistically have about 40 whp with bolt on's, tops. We have seen some optimistic claims which have been supported by dyno runs but from dynos that run correction factors, as in, dyno dynamics.

The baseline is fine I just have not seen a 400 whp dynojet run with bolt on's on pump.

These motors realistically have about 40 whp with bolt on's, tops. We have seen some optimistic claims which have been supported by dyno runs but from dynos that run correction factors, as in, dyno dynamics.

Why don't more people run in shootout mode is what I want to know?

But I'm not using a dynojet, and no correction factors here. Plus about 1-2 more timing advance for 93 octane and slightly leaner AFR's

I'm going to dyno and do this in stages, same dyno, and same operator (me). So it will be a slow process. Next week I am going to install the exhaust and apply the base tune. Then Pulley/cat delete. I am trying to do the cat delete last.