From dev-return-8025-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri Sep 13 17:55:18 2002
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83313 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2002 17:55:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Subscribe:
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83302 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2002 17:55:17 -0000
X-Authentication-Warning: cancer.clove.org: jerenk set sender to jerenkrantz@apache.org using -f
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:55:20 -0700
From: Justin Erenkrantz
To: David Reid
Cc: APR Development List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Create apr-build repository
Message-ID: <20020913175519.GW1555@apache.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz ,
David Reid ,
APR Development List
References: <20020913173631.GT1555@apache.org> <00f501c25b4d$307c0a00$7300a8c0@MITHRIL> <3D8224BA.2010605@electricjellyfish.net> <00fc01c25b4e$8f50d050$7300a8c0@MITHRIL>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00fc01c25b4e$8f50d050$7300a8c0@MITHRIL>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:54:08PM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> OK, this doesn't seem to gel with my original or current view of apr-util,
> but then you guys have been adding all sorts of stuff in there so maybe it's
> place in the world has altered. If that's the case then I'm still not sure
> doing something like this is the correct way of doing it.
Any suggestions then? This has a wider scope than just apr-util.
apr-util, httpd-2.0, serf, flood, SVN all require some subset of
those files I listed that are only in APR.
For serf, flood, and SVN, they copy those files into their local
repository. For apr-util and httpd-2.0, they require apr to be in a
very specific location. I think we can do better. -- justin