Fiscal Cliff: What is Illuminati Endgame?

December 26, 2012

(left, Tea Party sugar daddy, David Koch)

[The Zionist Billionaires Who Control Politics Updated from Sept 2010]

Lenin: "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it"

The US economy is on the cusp of a recovery fueled by Illuminati money creation at the rate of a trillion a year. Despite fiscal cliff jitters, the stock market is near all time highs,proof that money supply is the oxygenof the economy.

But wait, along come the Tea Party Republicans who want to take away the punch bowl through tax increases and spending cuts. They are the creation of the Illuminati Jewish Koch brothers, described in this article.

If the Tea Party were for real, it would disavow debt created out thin air;i.e., more than half the the "debt" doesn't need to be repaid.

Instead, they should becalling for debt-free, interest-free money creation. The money supply is a medium of exchange. It should not take the form of a "debt" to anyone. Like oxygen, no one should own it.

The Illuminati are pressing the accelerator (Obama) and the brake (Boehner) at the same time. What is their game?

Given their track record ofsubversion, my guess is that they will use the "fiscal cliff" to create maximum damage and disruption, and make the peoplemore disillusioned with democracy. I hope I am wrong.

"The plan, I think, is the old one of world dominion in a new form. The money-power and revolutionary power have been set up and given sham but symbolic shapes ('Capitalism' or 'Communism') and sharply defined citadels ('America' or 'Russia'). Such is the spectacle publicly staged for the masses. But what if similar men, with a common aim, secretly rule in both camps and propose to achieve their ambition through the clash between those masses? I believe any diligent student of our times will discover that this is the case." -- Douglas Reed

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Bloomberg Newshas a story on how the Zionist Koch brothers bankrolled the campaigns of Governors (like Scott Walker) who are cutting union powers. Whether we agree with this policy or not, these billionaires continue to define the political discourse in left-right terms when they should be defined as people versus IlluminatiLeft andRight.

The Sept 20, 2010 issue of The New Yorker had a profile of David and Charles Koch, entitled "The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama."

According to the article by Jane Mayer, the Koch's bankroll a plethora of Libertarian and "right-wing" lobbies, think tanks and foundations which, in turn, fund and direct the "grass roots" Tea Party movement.

"The anti-government fervor infusing the 2010 elections represents a political triumph for the Kochs," she writes. "By giving money to "educate," finance, and organize Tea Party protesters, they have helped turn their private agenda into a mass movement."

Mayer neglects to mention that the Koch's are Jews or crypto Jews; instead she tries to give them a "goy gloss."

Patriarch Fred Koch, a founding member of the John Birch Society, was a "real John Wayne type." He was the son of a "Dutch" printer who emphasized "rugged pursuits.' He took his four sons "big game hunting in Africa" and made them do "farm labor at the family ranch."

Surprising then to learn that Fred and his sons are on lists of Jewish billionaires, and "free-enterprise-Fred" made his fortune building refineries for the genocidal Communist dictator Josef Stalin in the 1930's. The Birch Society was and is an Illuminati Jewish front.

Liberals whinge about these nefarious "red necks" who oppose Obamacare and climate change, and lobby for less taxes and government interference. But that's not the real story here.

(Sam Newhouse)

The real story is that Jane Meyer works for another Illuminati Jewish billionaire, publisher Sam Newhouse. Her job is to create the illusion of free democratic discourse. Between the Sam Newhouses and George Soros' on the Left, and the Koch's and the Rupert Murdochs on the Right, a dozen Illuminati (Masonic) Jewish billionaires are able to define political discourse in America.

So while we're busy arguing about government intervention, we ignore the long list of things these billionaires apparently agree on: Israel, 9-11, the war on terror, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Federal Reserve, trillion dollar bank bailouts, liberal
immigration policy and "equal rights" for gays and lesbians, i.e. undermining marriage and family by promoting homosexual norms. You can bet they also agree on world government.

This is why nothing important changes. This is why crack dealer and bathhouse boy Barack Obama is our President. Why the "conservative" alternative was the Zionist-created Mitt Romney . The Billionaires of Zion are laughing up their sleeves at the goyim.

THE KOCH EMPIRE

Koch Industries is the second-largest private company in America after Cargill. "With an annual revenue of
$100 billion, the company was just $6.3 billion shy of first place in
2008. Ownership is kept strictly in the family, with the company being
split roughly between brothers Charles and David Koch, who are worth
about $20 billion apiece...Today, it operates thousands of miles of pipelines in
the United States, refines 800,000 barrels of crude oil daily, buys and
sells the most asphalt in the nation, is among the top 10 cattle
producers, and is among the 50 largest landowners."

According to the New Yorker, "the company has grown spectacularly since their father, Fred, died, in 1967, and the brothers took charge. The company expanded at an unreal rate: its revenues increased
from $100 million in 1966 to $100 billion in 2008--that's 1,000-fold
growth. The Koch's operate oil refineries in Alaska, Texas, and Minnesota, and control some four thousand miles of pipeline. Koch Industries owns Brawny paper towels, Dixie cups, Georgia-Pacific lumber, Stainmaster carpet, and Lycra, among other products."

According to researcher Yasha Levine, part of this growth was fueled by corruption: "William
Koch, the third brother who had a falling-out with Charles and David
back in the '80s over Charles' sociopathic management style, appeared on
"60 Minutes" in November 2000 to tell the world that Koch Industries
was a criminal enterprise: "It was - was my family company. I was out of
it," he says. "But that's what appalled me so much... I did not want my
family, my legacy, my father's legacy to be based upon organized
crime."

"Charles Koch's racket was very simple," explained
William. "With its extensive oil pipe network, Koch Industries' role as
an oil middleman--it buys crude from someone's well and sells it to a
refinery--makes it easy to steal millions of dollars worth of oil by
skimming just a little off the top of each transaction, or what they
call "cheating measurements" in the oil trade. According to William,
wells located on federal and Native American lands were the prime
targets of the Koch scam."

Rich Illuminati Jews and Masons not only created Communism in Russia; they created anti-Communism in the USA.

Fred Koch (1900-1967) was a chemical engineer who invented a new process for refining oil. Supposedly, he was shut out of the US by the Rockefellers and had to go to work for Stalin. He built many refineries in Soviet Russia and trained Russian engineers to operate them. Supposedly, he became disillusioned with Communism and became a founding member of the John Birch Society in the 1950's.

The trouble is that according to the 1964-65, Edition of Who's Who, this militant anti-Communist was still building refineries in Russia and Eastern Europe. Moreover, the John Birch society was founded by members of the Council on Foreign Relations, many of whom were Masons, and staffed by former Communist writers.

For example, the founder Robert Welch had been a member of the Communist front "League for Industrial Democracy." William Grede, for many years Chairman of the Executive Council of the JBS was a Fed banker. Robert Love, member of the Governing Council was a 32nd Degree Mason. William Macmillan was a member of the CFR. Writers Eugene Lyons and Harold Varney used to work for the Communist "Workers World." (Helen Peters, "Is the JBS Subversive?" July 1970)

Ralph Epperson was on their speaker's bureau. But they expelled him from the JBS when he mentioned Freemasonry in one of his speeches somewhere. The JBS strongly does not want Freemasonry mentioned.According to Eustace Mullins, the founder Robert Welch was a 32nd Degree Mason.

Evidently,the same treatment applies to Zionism, which is part of the Masonic fraternity.

"In modern industry ... capital, which force we represent, is [at] the apex. Both management and labor are on the base of this triangle. They continually stand opposed to each other and their attention is never directed to the head of their problem."

"At first, by controlling the banking system we were able to control corporation capital. Through this, we acquired total monopoly of the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media. The printing industry, newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our hands. The richest plum was later to come when we took over the publication of all school materials. Through these vehicles we could mold public opinion to suit our own purposes. The people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them, whether they be truth or lies."

Thus the Illuminati have a monopoly over our minds. By controlling both Left and Right, education and the mass media, the Masonic Jewish billionaires ensure that the masses are tractable. As the late great Alan Stang warned,
the Tea Party is a psy-op meant to channel the Patriot Movement
into the Left VS Right matrix.

Politics is like a House League in sports. The different teams all are Masons or are beholden to them. Thus, there's little chance of democratic change. Anyone who wants to play must abide by the "rules."

It's amusing to see "progressives" rail against the Tea Party and their sponsors. They are as much billionaire puppets as the rednecks they condemn.

The Illuminati Jewish billionaires have used "anti-Semitism" to give themselves immunity from criticism. However, they are responsible for anti-Semitism and for the suffering of their fellow Jews. Therefore, they don't deserve such consideration.

Comments for "Fiscal Cliff: What is Illuminati Endgame? "

Marcos said (December 27, 2012):

Since the 1920s Marxists realized that economic marxism was dead. Almost one century later, we still fall for the left versus right ruse. The new world order is a mix of Cultural Marxism and Economic Fascism. Large companies getting grants, loans and contracts from the government, but depending on decisions from the Party for everything.

In China, members of the Politburo are worth US$ 90 BI. In Brazil just one company got U$ 1 BI in government contracts this year, ten times the worth of the dole money for the poor that helped elected the president.

In both countries, the participation of Jews is minimal. Jewish financial control is largely an Anglo-American phenomenon, but Marxism is global.

The true opposition to Marxism is small government and free enterprise. If these are not present, you can suspect manipulation.

KPR said (December 27, 2012):

One only need look at the pic of David Koch and Sam Newhouse to know: One wouldn't leave their little girl or boy alone for even 3 seconds with either of these freaks. Their dead eyes give 'em away. I'm pleased for them that they're so wealthy. Hope the $$$$$$ buys 'em an air conditioned seat.

Tony B said (December 26, 2012):

Henry, in my early days in this war the patriots were all independent people who saw treasonous acts going on in the nation. We actually made some headway here and there with the public by exposing this treason even though most of the media was doing its best to demonize the very word "patriot."

But then came the Birch Society, well organized and obviously backed with tons of money. Their "chapters" were constantly saturated with bundles of reading material from headquarters which quickly began reshaping and concentrating the thinking of readers. It was reportedly all paid for by the Welch candy fortune. In a very short time the society sucked up most of those interested in saving the U.S. as a free nation.

Having been invited to attend their meetings many times as a recruiting ploy, I quickly grew weary of them. All their information seemed redundant and immaterial to the real war. My definition of the society became one of "constantly learning but never coming to the truth." That was backed up when I saw that two large and active chapters in So. California had their charters suddenly and unceremoniously jerked when their members decided to study "the Jewish question." Seemed very strange from an outfit that claimed to be in love with freedom of speech.

We had never heard of the name "Koch" in those days but it fits what was going on exactly.

Linda said (February 23, 2011):

It is the Agentur and entire network of secret society shabbos goy enablers ( Gentile Masonry ) that have re-egineered society in such a way as to float the the Koch turd and give their Zionist co-ethnics pride of place in the bowl.

As the flush facility has been removed, the Americans or Canadians who want to be that nationality first - followed by whatever their ethnic origin may be, these are the people who are going to have to identify "that smell" and take plunger, bucket, scouring brush, mop and clean water to the whole mess.

Linda said (February 23, 2011):

It is the Agentur and entire network of secret society shabbos goy enablers ( Gentile Masonry ) that have re-egineered society in such a way as to float the the Koch turd and give their Zionist co-ethnics pride of place in the bowl. As the flush facility has been removed, the Americans or Canadians who want to be that nationality first - followed by whatever their eithnic origin may be, these are the people who are going to have to identify "that smell" and take plunger, bucket, scouring brush, mop and clean water to the whole mess.

David said (September 22, 2010):

Why isn't American public affairs not about the 70% caucasian population? Or even about the 14% of Afro-americans? It is always about the 2% minority with 43 elected members in both houses. The Republicans are hijacking the next elections using a counterfeit Tea Party movement. Ron Paul and the true Libertarians have suddenly run out of steam. The zionists in the white house are suddenly leaving one by one. If this isn't a planned drama I don't know what is. Hypnotized by the power of fiat money, we all bow to worship those who have it in abundance. And we say that we are not heathen! I feel just like the guy in this video....... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRC3ytAjGeo&feature=player_embedded

Mario said (September 22, 2010):

Real good article on the Koch bros. I knew something was rotten in Denmark when I seen these two funding the tea party. I saw how Palin the protege of the international Jew and elder of zion Kissinger is trying to take over the tea party. Now it all ties together. Good article, I knew you had it in you Henry

Gary said (September 22, 2010):

And that is why no political movement would ever be capable of changing the system. It is too entrenched. It must all come crashing down and it will. Then intelligent men, assuming there are any left, can take a good look at the divinely inspired constitution and maybe a light bulb will go off. In the meantime the chaos which results from the crash hopefully will eliminate the satanist bloodsuckers.

Malachi said (September 22, 2010):

Is David Duke writing this shit for you? Why don't you send this to the New American and let them know. Also do a little research on Mullins medical history.

Dick said (September 22, 2010):

Really great stuff, Henry. One of your best in a while and sure to tick off some of your libertarian readers. Webster Tarpley provided
some additional details and analysis of the Koch brothers in this weekend's "World Crisis Radio."

There's a really good book called "Invisible Hands" by a Jewish NYU prof. about the corporate origins of "anti-communist" (anti-New
Deal) politics in America. Libertarianism is rife with Jews, crypto-Jews and fellow travelers, from von Mises and Ayn Rand to World Net Daily with its Jerusalem bureau, Michael Weiner Savage, Alex Jones the avoider, and any number of less subtle groups and individuals (Limbaugh, Beck, etc).

Communism, anti-communism and many other revolutionary movements do tend to start among the intelligensia but are advanced to the
public by Jewish shock-troops (as E. Michael Jones so thoroughly documents). A Ron Paul fan can claim his movement was "usurped" by
corporate interests, and the tea party is no longer true to libertarianism. One could also say Marxism was usurped by the Bolsheviks. But does that make Marxism correct, or was Marx just
laying groundwork to indoctrinate Communism's ideological vanguard? ...

The Tea Party wouldn't get anywhere by focusing on fiscal policy – the average person is too unsophisticated, but it can take that
hard-core of Ron Paul / Alex Jones types, who are opinion shapers among their friends and family, and refocus the messages on immigration, the deficit and various socio-cultural issues. I'd
probably agree with Sarah Palin's position on immigration, but it's the tail, not the dog – and I couldn't disagree more with her dog.

The challenge for those of us who buy much of the analysis and not the solutions is to learn the game and use reason. If I sat down to play chess against a superior player, I won't understand what's happening to me until I'm in checkmate. Sometimes I'll think I've made progress when I've been lured into a trap. Someone like Ron
Paul doesn't have to be a liar if he's credulously advancing a part of the lie – or at least if his agenda is exposed to co-option. If
we reflexively accept, for example, that Abraham Lincoln was a tyrant because he violates libertarianism, we lose a whole spectrum
of ideas and the ability to think rationally. We lose our humility and the willingness to examine history and project its available
choices forward.

The success of the tea party is a good indication that "pure" libertarianism is a faulty ideology. I continue to look to people like Tarpley, who represent the real traditions of America, for
more concrete, time-tested and unassailable solutions.

Dan said (September 22, 2010):

A research contribution of the late Eustace Mullins was his exposure of Freemasons at the helm of the John Birch Society. Their sugar daddy was none other than Nelson Rockefeller. Astounding, isn't it?

Unfortunately all such organizations are provided to shepherd genuine public awareness into a corral. Before the 'Tea Party Movement' had a name it was real individuals who had wised up realizing that the 'right' wasn't their friend, and left leaning people who realized the same about the left. There was a time in early 20065 when I realized lots of people were coming out of their political party programming coma.
Consensus of public opinion is the one word that that fades the smirk from the mouths of Wall Street wizards and Madison Avenue dream merchants alike.

Thanks for finding out who's funding the 'Tea Party'. Just another shepherd pen. Rather than consensus of opinion 'movements' are wrapped up in candy coating of the rhetoric that articulates the public perceptions, but they infect it with vitriolic blame of somebody else. My experience with the Tea Party is they've been poisoned by directing their blame at 'Muslims' and illegal immigrants.

Ed said (September 22, 2010):

Would have liked to have seen at least a notation of the other 'illuminati' religious branches, ie illuminati catholics, etc religions, but thought it was an Excellent article on the subject. Yes, the illuminati jews are in charge of media control, with other illuminati religious parties doing their part in their 'specialized' areas.

Once again, an article that needs to be seen by the general public, and understood by them. I remember as a child listening to my Grandfather and his circle of friends discussing such things a fluoride, communist infiltration, and indoctrination, and many other things. These were simple, formally uneducated men, "rednecks" if you will. The difference was "they got it", they knew things were changing and not for the better, even in the fifties. Yet they weren't able to get at the "big picture".

The beauty if you will of the illuminati, is they are proud of what they do, and seem to revel in "rubbing our faces in it". Thankfully we are able to see what they are up to, and if we are "proactive" towards their ways and not "reactive" we have a chance of staving off some of what they have planned for us. The Koch's and Newhouse's are another part of the illusion that's presented for us to see. They make themselves in our "benefactors, when in fact they have nothing but our subjugation in mind. I honestly think one of the few things I have in common with these "people" is we both breath oxygen. Aside from that there are few similarities.

The truth is, we need to see behind the curtain, and understand who and what controls most all of what we see and hear, and what their true agenda is. Perhaps my favorite line in the article was this. "It's amusing to see "progressives" rail against the Tea Party and their sponsors. They are as much billionaire puppets as the rednecks they condemn." It pretty much sums up what we see playing out in "politics" today.

Another great article Dr.Makow, I don't know how you have time to write so much and so well, but you are appreciated.

Bob said (September 22, 2010):

Your newest post hits the nail on the head Henry. I'm happy you covered the Kochs. I was suspicious myself about the Tea Party movement from the day it emerged and when the term was coined by the national networks. Divide and conquer... Create the revolution yourself and then define its parameters (always agreeing on Israel, 9/11, the Fed, Afghanistan and Iraq, etc - BRILLIANT if you think about how well they executed on the protocols; the goy ate it up hook, line and sinker.)

But oh how the sheep love their "politics." And however do they enjoy arguing and pointing fingers at each other, pretending to be big men who are the smartest in their pack. They think they are so involved and intelligent and informed and don't realize they are playing the man's game.

You know what? The more I realize what the world really is, the more I believe the Goy have gotten precisely what they deserve. They don't even deserve freedom. Like the idiot neo-cons say on their bumper stickers (which is really just a pretext for their ravenous blood-thirst and war-mongering borne in racism) "Freedom ain't Free." Ain't that the truth? You have to first have the intelligence to spot your real slave-master and the courage to stand up and fight him.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at