Boston Marathon bombing: Where’s the crater in the sidewalk?

Isn’t it amazing that the mainstream media never question events like the Boston Marathon “bombing?” Why do media and big government always agree on the reported story line? Shouldn’t government and its buddy media be more like financial investigations looking for the obvious motive of inside trading fraud?

An intelligent Moralmatters reader makes the following observations about the Boston Marathon “bombing:”

Moralmatters reader:

“The one thing you have to take into account is that if there was a bomb big – powerful – enough to blow off a man’s legs, there should have been a corresponding (huge) crater in the sidewalk where the bomb had gone off.

I saw no crater, only a smudge of smoke on the sidewalk (in only one video).”

Another comment by the same Moralmatters reader – (see pics following {below} the comment):

“Here’s faker Heather. Top pic shows her in Hollywood…lower left shows her in Boston this week. Lower Right picture is her Hollywood glamour shot.

She lost her leg years ago in a motorcycle accident. No wonder she can’t make it in movies…she’s a lousy actor. Lower Left photo is her being interviewed by Anderson Cooper, a far Left reporter on CNN.”

Why was it (as with the alleged Sandy Hook shooting massacre) there were government “training drills” at both scenes? Could it be that with these drills, there were a ready supply of crisis actors, available?

Excerpt of a comment response from this website’s operator, James F. Tracy:

>>>> I’ve also reached out to the editors of the Boston Globe, Boston Herald, and New York Times to inquire whether they have been able to obtain autopsies or death certificates of the three BMB decedents. No responses from any of these publications. >>>>>

20 thoughts on “Boston Marathon bombing: Where’s the crater in the sidewalk?”

I posted this on my Facebook page and almost immediately had someone say:

“No crater necessary.”

To that I responded:

“Please elaborate why you think that there would be no significant or even minimal (geographical) depression at its “ground zero” explosion?”

And, another FB person stated in a several short comments:

“A small unrestrained explosion like that will NOT leave a crater. The blast will go up or sideways taking the path of least…….Anyone with a BASIC knowledge of explosives physics knows that. That’s why they do so much damage sideways. They’re NOT supposed to be cratermakers…….A small unrestrained explosion like that will NOT leave a crater. The blast will go up or sideways taking the path of least resistance……..Anyone with a BASIC knowledge of explosives physics knows that…..”

To his comment, I replied:

“Please elaborate why you think that there would be no significant or even minimal (geographical) depression at its “ground zero” explosion? For such a big reported explosion of this magnitude that was supposed to tear of peoples extremity limbs – why even no minimal geographical depression?”

Then there was a comment from the person who said, “No crater necessary:”

He said (on FB) – Ever seen a stunt man get in a box with TNT and “blow himself up”?

To which I replied:

Then, what you are saying lends credence to what the Moralmatters commenter said. His proposition was that the “bombing” was fake. It can’t be both ways.

Crater or not, why is it that we see only two broken windows at site #1 and only one broken window at site #2? Real blasts of that size with ball bearings and nails would have broken dozens of windows in all directions. It would have also shattered the blue banner on the street and affected runners in the street at both locations.

You should have no problem answering your first question as I have upgraded the posting. See the added pics and read the captions along with the related links.

As to your second question, I think that the same (type of question) could be asked of Obama – “Why don’t you think that more people aren’t condemning him – especially all the media people who should be doing their jobs as journalists?”

That’s a good question. Nathan’s reply is to the point. “Heather” has stated herself that she unfortunately lost her foot in a motorcycle accident. Check the provided links for a definitive answer.

The fact that the DHS–FEMA Directors are rushing these amputee actors into ‘rehab’ tells me that they are desperate to shorten the time they are paid for this disgusting charade.

These hospitals ought to be ashamed of themselves. Aren’t our hospitals supposed to be used heal people who are actually injured and ill? Using hospitals as movie sets for a nefarious NDAA political agenda is vile and repulsive in the extreme.

You mentioning in your excellent response to Ana, “These hospitals ought to be ashamed of themselves.” I agree.

But, in the case of the Boston Marathon “bombing,” I thought I read somewhere that all the injured were treated at only one area hospital – the one with a Jewish name to it. I remember reading some news piece of the director of that hospital. If this is the case, then the reported “fact” of just one hospital being used to treat all the Boston Marathon “bombing” “victims,” is cause for yet another red flag to this whole sorted event. Something really smells……..

We see “Heather” bouncing around the rehab ward after TWO weeks. This is laughable in a case of blast injury and prove she was injured years ago and is playing the part of an actor amputee. You do not recover sufficiently from this type of massive injury after two weeks to be in a rehab environment.

It would all depend on what assignment one has in Hollywood. She’s basically an unknown, so her checks would be relatively small as a ‘background’ person. Speaking parts pay a lot more. It would all depend on the length of employment. I used to work at Paramount Studios-Hollywood and appeared in several films…believe me, its rat race. There’s a lot of competition. There are hundreds of people auditioning for the choice parts.

Since the government has several dozen of these fakers on the payroll, I would imagine they are not over-paying them. All of these crisis amputee actors are in for several weeks or months of income. I hope this whole sordid affair turns sour and soon. If that’s the case, these amputee actors will be dropped like a bad habit.

Excerpt of a comment response from this website’s operator, James F. Tracy:

>>>> I’ve also reached out to the editors of the Boston Globe, Boston Herald, and New York Times to inquire whether they have been able to obtain autopsies or death certificates of the three BMB decedents. No responses from any of these publications. >>>>>

If death certificates are needed, a county clerk will make some fake ones. This is done all the time in these False Flag government operations. Remember this: If it comes from a government office, there’s a good chance its phony.

There seems to be no end to what lengths the government will go to ‘milk’ this fraud for every ounce of political propaganda they can. I guess the first figure of ‘140’ injured at Boston was not exciting enough, so they upped it to 263 injured. Laughable in a very sick manner.

The complicit MSM is currently rushing from hospital to hospital and interviewing these fake amputee actors. The amputee actors are smiling, laughing and having a great time being in the spotlight. This will probably go on for months. [Notice that the fake victims of Sandy Hook are still used by the White House for celebrity appearances.]

The fakers in Boston are having miraculous healings in record time. Two weeks after supposedly having had both legs removed by a ‘blast’, they’re already in advanced rehab. Laughable if it weren’t so depraved and preying on the gullible public’s natural sympathies and emotions. I guess DHS wants to shorten the time they have to pay these treasonous phonies.