Pages

Thursday, December 7, 2017

The Shape of an L - a reply from Junior F [Watchman]

I love the idea that
people read the posts I write. Some you like, some … less so. Whatever people
think about the individual piece, I’m always grateful to know that I provoked
some degree of thought and discussion. It is genuinely humbling and I thank all
those who get in touch to discuss a piece or give me additional information, or
help me build a fuller understanding. Then there’s “Junior F [Watchman]” … He
decided that, after reading my most recent post about the possible meaning of the L-shape in Early Medieval Irish art that he had to go track down my
personal email account and send me a 1,200 word reply under the title of “A
mission to find your contact email..”.

An edge-on view of the wonderful Stowe Missal Shrine (Warner 1906)

Although I never
claimed that the idea of the Trinity was ‘Biblical Doctrine’, he really wants to
put me straight on this issue and how it ‘is one of the most profound lies
spread by Catholicism which is diametrically opposed to the Shema’. He reckons
(without providing anything as tawdry as evidence) that the ‘L-shape’ could
refer to ‘"EL-ohim" in Biblical Hebrew is the word for
"God", a Supreme title.’ I’m also accused of using the word ‘write’
when I should have said (or ‘typed’) that I had typed it. As only Junior F [Watchman]’s
god can create anything and you can’t use the word in any other way, I’m
blaspheming against him. Junior F [Watchman] needs to tell me that: ‘you are
basically assisting the 'stupidizing' of language by using certain terms in
definitions that have been "SOCIALIZED"/"PAGANZIED" and you
have no clue it seems that when you use the word "Create" in a
definition that is has nothing to do with God being subject of the word
"Create", you are actually blaspheming Him’. He goes on to say that
Jesus commands him to warn me against this. He’s not particularly clear whether
this is a general command or if Jesus mentioned me specifically, but from what
I can gather of Junior F [Watchman]’s personality, it really could go either
way. Junior F [Watchman]’s tone then takes a turn for the dark and violent as
he notes ‘what you do with this after is your situation, not mine,
sinch (sic.) by then your blood is
off my hands.’ He ends with the charming statement that 'I can provide more evidence if requested.' ... Frankly, I'm at a loss to see what evidence he's presented at all ... but, different strokes and all that ...

I suppose that my
greatest disappointment here is that I would have hoped that, should I ever be
contacted by a member of Alan Moore’s Watchmen, it’d be Silk Spectre, Rorschach,
or even Dr Manhattan (heck, even Night Owl, at a push!) … not some lightly deranged ‘former paganos-catholicos of
30+ years’ who takes his spelling lessons from the Tyndale Bible he quotes as
his email sig file. For the record, I’ve decided to post his entire comment
here and not reply directly to him ... just in case I’m suddenly hit by a bolt
of lightening …

+ + +

Greetings in the one
who inhabits all of eternity,

Mr. Robert Chapple.. i
came across your article today title "The Shape of an L".

I'm a former
paganos-catholicos of 30+ years emaiing you from Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Within the last 12 years of my life i became
a true born again beliver according to proper first century Jude 1:1-3 Gospel
understanding as it was actually taught in the first century mindset by Jesus
and the Apostles. Thus, the "Trinity" is NOT "Bible
Doctrine", rather it's Platonic Philosophy that was injected forcefully
into the early church by the very wolves that Jesus, Peter, James, John and
Paul warned about w/ tears (See Acts 20:29 + Colossians 2:8-9 as one prime
example.) Further, i am trained in
biblical greek and biblical hebrew of varying strengths and frankly to claim
the "Trinity" is "Biblical Doctrine" is one of the most
profound lies spread by Catholicism which is diametrically opposed to the Shema
(Deuteronomy 6:4 and many other examples in the Old and New Covenant.) The
Trinity philosophy, that's what it is, is part of what is known as
"Mystery Religions" especially of Egypt and Babylon and it is an
utmost severe corruption of the Biblical New Covenant Israelite comprehension
of the Godhead. God has a name, His name
is Jesus, He is the Spirit of all spirits, He is not a 'person' (See Numbers
23:19, Job 9:32, 1Samuel 15:29). There were many various trinity religious
philosophies which of course belonged to pagans and heathens before God
incarnated and named Himself Jesus which before God did this, the Hebrews who
later became Israelites, knew with no doubts, that ANYONE who worshipped a 'trinity',
were pagans or heathens, it was a severe corruption of the ONE God. Therefore your claims that are founded on the
false belief that the Trinity is "Biblical Doctrine", well when a
foundation is bulit on a great false rock, and really it's sand, it is
self-destruction when the time comes for they are direct opposition to correct
exegesis of the Biblical Greek and Biblical Hebrew of the first century.

As for the
"L" .. "EL-ohim" in Biblical Hebrew is the word for
"God", a Supreme title. It
could be the "L's" that you see everywhere are a reference to
"El" (El-ohim). Though the word is a plural word in Hebrew grammar,
only when it is used for the God of the Holy Bible, it is used in the singular
form as part of factual comprehension of proper grammatical Hebrew as
substantiated by Deuteronomy 6:4, thus, to claim God is a trinity, when there
are so many Biblical verses when properly exegeted that refute God is a
trinity, well frankly.. you are spreading a Catholic position, and any
non-denonominational (denonominational is a Catholic term, not biblical) true
born again beliver in Jesus the Christ (Matthew 6:24-34, Mark 8:34-38 / Luke
9:23-24, 14:27, 17:33 / John 3:3-5, 3:16, 12:24-25 / Galatians 5:19-26 /
1Corinthians 1:30-31, 1Peter4:17-18 etc) knows that such a position is the
utmost doctrine of devils that was injected into the early church that was
infiltrated by the mystery religion wolves who pretended to be 'true believers
in the One God" but bit by bit were fully successful after 150 A.D. of their
infiltration thereby causing so many to believe that the "Trinity"
was a biblical doctrine when even according to John the Apostle's disciple
"Polycarp", in his own writings he has no problem revealing candidly
that right before his death circa 150s A.D., the early church was already fully
infiltrated by all these wolves and were spreading and had cemented most severe
corruptions and perversions of the Godhead understanding according to the
Israelite mindset, and thus were also successful in injecting many other false
views of the Scriptures which of course again, Jesus, Peter, James, John and
Paul warned about with tears on their couch when they wrote their letters to
born again bible believing ekklesia. All
the books of the New Testament were written from late 30s A.D. to around 98
A.D. All the 27 books of the Holy Bible
were already accepted among all bible born again communities in the Land of
Israel in this time frame as "Biblical Canon". Rome was still very much pagan at this time
as it still is, and it was Rome who murdered Peter and Paul. Rome didn't decide to adopt what Jesus and
the Apostles taught until around 330s A.D. and the version they adopted was a
very corrupted version mixed with Mithraism and the Egyptian cult of Serapis,
which existed circa around 200 B.C. as an Egyptian/Greco Theosis cult which is
where the classic Greek word "Christian" comes from which is NOT a
word that Jesus or Paul used (who wrote most of the New Covenant) and the word
"Christian" and "Christianity" are actually terms that were
used by the Cult of Serapis, even Hadrian confirms this and the word
"Christian" is a severe pejorative insult to the Apostles and their
disciples for the word "Christian" actually implies deity (hence why
such cults were theosis cults) and thus nowhere did Jesus or the Apostles teach
that when you become born again, you became a little god/little (the)
christ/little divinity/little king of israel etc, it's utterly blasphemous. The
word "Christian" is only used 3 times in the New Testament and each
time it's used, it's used as the pejorative diminutive it was understood
as. When the Emperor of Rome, Emperor
Hadrian _(76 A.D. - 138 A.D.)_ wrote from the area that Alexander conquered he
said;

"Those who worship
Serapis are *Christianos (Christians) and those who call themselves Bishops of
"Christ" are vowed to Serapis (S..ap..) a GRACEO-EGYPTIAN God."

Lastly, only God/Jesus
creates, for it means "Out of nothing - Exnihlo" which the Holy Bible
makes clear only God is subject of the word "Create", it's something
only HE does, NOT man. Also in your
article you use the word "WRITE".
IF you typed out your article, this is not "WRITING" this is
TYPING. It is of utmost importance in today's english age which shows itself to
be increasingly and quickly degenerating into idiot english from intelligent
english, it's becoming so more apparent that the internet is causing many
people to not become wiser, more intelligent, but actually more dictionary
illiterate. You're not writing unless
you actually wrote your article with your hands and a pen or pencil etc. I hope the following quotes help you
comprehend what you are doing, that you are basically assisting the
'stupidizing' of language by using certain terms in definitions that have been
"SOCIALIZED"/"PAGANZIED" and you have no clue it seems that
when you use the word "Create" in a definition that is has nothing to
do with God being subject of the word "Create", you are actually
blaspheming Him, you may not care, but I do as a born again remnant believer
and Jesus commands me to warn you against it, what you do with this after is
your situation, not mine, sinch by then your blood is off my hands.

I can provide more
evidence if requested.

Thus .. if one builds
their foundations an very seriously false understanding of the first century
Israelite mindset and facts of the New Testament, their whole journey is cursed
and fraught with error that all emanates from beginning on the left foot,
instead of the right.

Selah.

Regards,

Junior

Philippians 1:21 For the Christ is to me lyfe and deeth is to
me a vauntage. – Tyndale Bible 1534

+ + +

As a little
PS, I’d just like to reiterate that, even when I use a keyboard, I’m
still writing and I can (and do) create both art and literature – it’s not a term reserved just for the
actions of a god. If Junior F [Watchman] doesn’t like this, I suggest that he
prays for me to stop!