Would point out that Watson scored 145 runs in 8 matches and RtD scored 128 in 3.

RtD impacted games more with the bat and was certainly more valuable to his side than Watson was to Australia

Aus already has half the players in the side (inc 12th man), no need to get greedy and want Watson in there as well

Originally Posted by vic_orthdox

Therefore you can argue that he wasn't really able to have an effect on matches with the bat, and he wasn't all that wonderful with the ball. RTD did have an effect on the tournament/matches with his batting, therefore should be ahead of Watson.

Was better with the ball than RTD, IMO. And if you're looking for a sixth bowler/lower order batsman, he'd fit the bill better.

Originally Posted by Irfan

We may not like you, your filthy rich coffers or your ratbag scum of supporters but by god do we respect you as a football team