No.. Feminism is just sexual hatred. I am not implying that women should not have equal rights with men. But they don't call them "Feminazis' for nothing. This movement, from what I have read on it, is just like the other movements that use the word 'reparations' somewhere in their world. Affirmative action, Feminism, and the like are little more then discrimination. Any time you have to put a label on a group, you are talking a form of discrimination. Are men and women different? I hope so! That's just life. But there are certain things that should be equal. Both should be paid the same wage for the same job.. (read EXACT same job.. Don't go comparing apples to oranges). Both should have the same rights to life liberty and the pursuit of property ( happiness). Where it crosses the line is when the feminists feel they need special treatment just because they are women and they feel they were wronged in the past. Yes, by all means fight for the end of inequalities in society. But, don't do it by creating new inequalities aimed at another group. Cancer is a good example of this "woman first to hell with the rest" attitude I see in feminists. . All you see is 'run for the cure' and when you look at it, the 'cure' is for breast cancer only. Well? what about Child Lukemia? Myloma, Lung cancer?? How about run for the cure of ALL cancer. I could go on ad nausium but I hope you get my point..

Why I worry about what I described as people trying to paint feminism as being noble is that the blanket statement "feminism is okay with us" opens the door to a large percentage of self-described feminists who are very, very antithetical to White Nationalism in terms of their politics, and I would hate to see people saying, "You said you're okay with feminism, and this person is a feminist, so you ought to accept what she supports."

Speaking strictly for myself, I am not so much trying to portray feminism as 'noble' but as a broad ideology that like WN can be corrupted, taken to unacceptable/unnecessary extremes, infiltrated, and hijacked while containing a kernel of truth. If self-described feminists with views antithetical to WN show up- they will give expression to those views - and be rooted out.

I also kind of see where HL is coming from calling himself a liberal- again a broad ideology. There are some who think wanting to help even down-on-their-luck white people, regulate working hours, or safeguard animals/the environment smacks of liberalism- and there is an emphasis on such issues in what I consider liberalism.

None of the above is meant to insult you; we're lucky to have you (and all us SF women) aboard.

A troll is someone who attempts to provoke an angry or stupid reaction from someone, or as it used to be called on Usenet, "lulzmining". Whether she's who she says she is or not, she's clearly not trying to piss us off.

I believe so, but they have another little game that they like to play: Women mature mentally before men, not just physically. If you test them in high-school, the women do much better. So guess when they like to test them!

And when SHOULD they test them? About age 35, the age where people make great contributions to society. By that age, the average male IQ has significantly outstripped the average female IQ. I would love to see men of this age tested via random sampling in China and Europe. I think I know what the results would be, and China wouldn't like it. Neither would the anti-White libtards, which is why they know about this problem but don't bother to correct it. Liberals are liars. They see nothing wrong with lying constantly to everyone about anything that contradicts their beliefs.

every year, High school boys significantly outperform girls on SAT. sexual maturity has nothing to do with the GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY. After 50 years of girl power, women are still significantly underrepresented in STEM jobs: specially Computer Science and Engineering:http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default...vation8311.pdf
and 94.5% of holders of commercialized patents are male:http://ftp.iza.org/dp6886.pdf
According to 2014 FIDE, 98% of world chess Grand masters are male.
Fields medal winners in math are 100% male.
And more than 90% of Nobel prize winners are male.
96% of CEOs, more than 70% of physicians, 70% of lawyers and 82% of Congress. are male

1-Feminism is strikingly similar to Islamism. Both movements are stricken with Inferior Complexity. Feminism, Communism and Islamism, all these movements have one common battle cry: "Death to White Man!"
Marxism is the hatred of the noble Aryan spirit, and just like Marxism, the Feminism is the hatred of noble Aryan spirit which is masculine to the core.

2-during my college days, i had an argument with a Feminist girl; she was such a mediocre Ignoramus. during our discussion, she suddenly shouted:"throughout history, men treated women like animals!" and i told her:"The entire human civilization is a MALE creation. if you don't like male domination, you can simply leave their society!"
there is something ridiculous about feminism; you know, throughout history our fathers sacrificed their young lives to feed their women, and women used men as an object of Economic success. women don't need feminism, they need a little sense of justice!
women are living in a male created world: From Electricity to TVs, Computers, cars, etc; Every single invention on this planet is a male creation. by using male inventions, women automatically submit themselves to male domination and male superiority.
So ladies, if you don't like us, please leave our dirty, violent, stinky, boyish, societies or if you want to stay in our male created world, please respect the owner!

3-Just like Muslims who kill Americans with the American technology, the ridiculous feminist parasite, insults her superior partner and at the same time she blatantly uses his inventions. every woman who doesn't believe in patriarchy is simply a feminist, and a feminist parasite is as dangerous as Islamist morons. i show no respect for such subhumans.
The IE people, specially Germanic tribes were extremely patriarchal. The gods of ancient Germanic tribes, Odin, Thor, Baldur etc, were the representatives of masculine creativity and wisdom.
4-Interestingly the Pre-Islamic Arabs, worshiped three chief Goddesses as their deities: Aluzza, Hubal and al-laatAl-l?t - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaHubal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greek civilization, Roman Civilization and Germany are pure masculine creations. patriarchy is NOT the same as suppression of women. men rule, simply because they have larger brains and significantly higher IQs.

During my college days i had several major verbal conflicts with those pathetic pests. my head is full of their ugly voices. please, no more Sex Conflict on SF!

The issue with "Women! Quit your jobs, the liberals are making you work!" is that some women can't find or have a man to support them. Do you expect them to live out on the street or with their parents for the rest of their life? What about women who honestly love a career--shall they sit and watch men do it? And women with disabilities that can provide nothing for a man in the household? Sterile women? Widowed women? Women with their men in prison? Women who actually have a fear of men because of past abuse? Unattractive women? And what about when a family has such huge debts/fees that a single man working can not hope to pay them?

There's clearly a lot of issues with both gender-equality and anti-gender-equality, and it's impossible to choose one side without a lot of issues/drawbacks.

Good points. However most women can find a man though it may not be their Mr. Right or the perfect match. And yes women can work! I'm not against women working I am against women putting a career over a family! And that is what feminism really is when you boil it all down it is selfishness, pride, hatred of men. As for a family having huge debts that is usually the fault of jew capitalism run amok. Family watches TV, buys too much stuff, uses credit cards, buys too many cars too big of a house etc etc. And then there are those who have massive medical bills they cannot pay. Sadly, life isn't fair. I have lost so many loved ones in recent years. But I never cried to the government about it.

As for women being abused and not wanting to be around men there is no easy answer for that one other than to punish the man severely for what he has done, and comfort the woman as best we can as a community, as a society. Life isn't perfect, but feminism is not the answer that is going to perfect your life as a woman.

So you expect us to reverse industrialization and reduce our sense of unity?

There is a great deal worth saving from today's world. I don't recommend a scorched-earth policy. However, the desertified expanse of paved surfaces and bare rooftops isn't worth saving. There's nothing to save in an old, roach-infested, flimsy, two-bedroom shell. If you want to save a million of 'em, start with Detroit -- and good luck!

What's the long-term cost to society of shuttling a hundred million people around at high speed in two tons of steel? Pretty high. So why add to that cost with the nuclear power plants needed to maintain and expand that lifestyle? White people don't exist to serve the greed of the jewish financial megalith. Expel the rats, and the rat race suddenly becomes an old-fashioned way of thinking.

The only "sense of unity" I see among women in today's growing jew-style ghettoes is their similarity of tattoo markings, body piercings, glitter wearings, cinnamon streakings, plastic heelings, condom packagings, flab bulgings, trash talkings, and niglet bearings. Women couldn't possibly have a lower "sense of unity" than they do worshipping the golden calf.

Somehow, a "disunited" farm folk expelled the Muslim menace from Europe. That's something they can't do today. So don't equate the jew-finance social engineering project with white unity. Never.

__________________

Nonwhite males must never come within a thousand miles of a white woman.

The Crusades were only made possible by urbanization, in fact. Face it: Agriculturalism naturally leads to urbanization.

You seem to forget the Western Church and Eastern Censorate systems that were keenly aware of the potential threat of the town-based merchant class and kept a heavy heel on its neck. With a strong Church, the only urbanization that agriculture naturally leads to is the canton. Protestant Puritanism was the foot in the door to drag the folk out of the church and, ultimately, into the abortion clinic and ladyboy show. Protestantism is, was, and forever will be, the atheist-foreigner merchant fake piety that it uses to rip the folk from the land and thus, from their eternal homeland. (And how silly it was for moneygrubbers to poor-mouth and pretend to be more meek and pure than the salt of the Earth!)

This thread is interesting, because I also consider myself a feminist in process of awakening. However, despite my racial awakening I haven't changed my views about the need of an egalitarian society for white men and women.

That is a True Scotsman fallacy. There are plenty of white men who do these same things you speak of, and there are a couple examples in White Nationalism. Have you forgotten about David Curtiss Stephenson and Robert Hansen? You also assume all what white women wish for is to be housewives, which isn't true.

I'd like to ask you what would you do in an hypothetical scenario. Imagine you have an auditorium full of young white girls, and you are allowed to speak your mind without any anti-white interference. How would you convince them to join White Nationalism? Telling them is to protect their wombs and help them be good white housewives won't work. It will backfire instead. Young girls (like myself) we have grown up believing that if we try hard we can be anything we wish. From housewife to combat pilot. From business owner to CEO. From farmer to president. Maybe is a Jewish lie or liberal indoctrination. But the fact stands is what we believe. So how could you help racially awake all of these girls? what would be your argument that would be better of what liberalism offer them?

I never said anything about being a housewife but if the Negro has his way the White woman will be the bitch that gets slapped and told " yo gets me my beer bitch" or raped or killed Plus you're operating under the assumption that you'll be a CEO pilot or whatever under Brown rule.

Only the White man and the White race can create a society where White women can be what they want. Under Black rule you're a ho who gets slapped raped killed and told to rub the Black man's feet and get his beer.

Under Liberalism White women are the fastest growing demographic for AIDS at the hands of Black men infecting them. The White race being in charge again would end all of that.

It's the White race and the White man who gave respect to women and opened voting rights and equality. That would never happen under UGLY AFRICAN RULE!

The White woman is safer and best off so long as the White race remains the majority and the White race is in charge.

I never said anything about being a housewife but if the Negro has his way the White woman will be the bitch that gets slapped and told " yo gets me my beer bitch" or raped or killed Plus you're operating under the assumption that you'll be a CEO pilot or whatever under Brown rule.

Only the White man and the White race can create a society where White women can be what they want. Under Black rule you're a ho who gets slapped raped killed and told to rub the Black man's feet and get his beer.

Under Liberalism White women are the fastest growing demographic for AIDS at the hands of Black men infecting them. The White race being in charge again would end all of that.

It's the White race and the White man who gave respect to women and opened voting rights and equality. That would never happen under UGLY AFRICAN RULE!

The White woman is safer and best off so long as the White race remains the majority and the White race is in charge.

I never said anything about being a housewife but if the Negro has his way the White woman will be the bitch that gets slapped and told " yo gets me my beer bitch" or raped or killed Plus you're operating under the assumption that you'll be a CEO pilot or whatever under Brown rule.

Only the White man and the White race can create a society where White women can be what they want. Under Black rule you're a ho who gets slapped raped killed and told to rub the Black man's feet and get his beer.

Under Liberalism White women are the fastest growing demographic for AIDS at the hands of Black men infecting them. The White race being in charge again would end all of that.

It's the White race and the White man who gave respect to women and opened voting rights and equality. That would never happen under UGLY AFRICAN RULE!

The White woman is safer and best off so long as the White race remains the majority and the White race is in charge.

Only the White race can be trusted to protect the White woman and all women worldwide.