A little randomness in deploying Border Patrol agents might work
best to prevent illegal border crossings, according to a study from the
RAND Corp.

The study,
which was funded by the Department of Homeland Security's Science and
Technology Directorate, found that combining historical data on illegal
crossings with a bit of unpredictability would nab the highest fraction
of border crossers.

The U.S.-Mexico border spans nearly 2,000 miles. Given its vastness
and varied terrain, there is simply no way to saturate every mile with
enough agents to catch every illegal immigrant or smuggler, said Joel
Predd, study co-author and a researcher at RAND. The Border Patrol
therefore must develop effective strategies to deploy a limited number
of agents, he said.

In the past, the Border Patrol stationed agents by relying heavily on
historical trends of where border crossers were apprehended, said Randy
Capps, a senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute,
a think tank that studies worldwide migration patterns.

"As it has been, it's pretty predictable where resources are going to
be deployed. They announce an operation, they do an operation, and they
stay there a long time."

The trouble with that strategy is that once crossers notice increased
enforcement, they might alter their routes and actually have a higher
rate of success in unpatrolled areas.

For instance, after the Border Patrol launched Operation Gatekeeper
in 1994 to halt the flow of traffic through San Diego, illegal entriesthere plunged, but overall apprehensions continued to climb. In general, rising apprehensionnumbers could mean better enforcement, higher overall traffic or some combination, Predd said.

The RAND researchers conducted field interviews with agents to learn
about illegal crossing trends, staffing levels, patrol strategies and
past deployment patterns. They created simulations of individual Border
Patrol agents and crossers and modified where agents were placed using
past patterns in illegal crossing, random distributions or a combination
of both. They also drew from real data to create comparisons and
metrics for different stations across the border.

A mix of strategies worked best to catch the highest fraction of crossers.

"We looked at thousands of scenarios based on the number of zones,
number of patrol agents, the daily rate of illegal smuggling," Predd
said. "The idea that you should combine the two and shouldn't really use
them in isolation is really robust across a wide range of values."

The study had a few limitations. For instance, it didn't address the
geographic conditions that constrain crossers' ability to shift their
routes, Predd said. Some remote, mountainous regions of the border are
almost impossible to cross, while others are close to urban centers and
transportation routes. Weather and seasonal conditions also might
prevent crossers from changing their routes.

The Border Patrol claims that increased and more effective border
enforcement already has caused the number of illegal crossings to
plummet. The agency nearly doubled [PDF] the number of agents from 2005 to 2011 and has built hundreds of miles of fencing and sensors.

In the same time span, the number of illegal immigrants apprehended [PDF] dropped
from 1,189,075 people to 340,252, with most of the decline occurring in
the years after the recession started in 2007.

While beefed-up enforcement might have deterred some would-be
crossers, Capps said other factors may have more impact on
border-crossing trends. The U.S. economy has floundered since the
recession, while the Mexican economy has done relatively well, reducing
the incentive to make the arduous journey, he said.

Demographics also might play a role.

"The birth rate has been low there for a number of years," Capps
said. "This large pool of people who could potentially migrate to the
U.S. from Mexico is just much smaller than it was even five to 10 years
ago, and it's going to continue to decline."

"You have less incentive, more opportunities at home, and it's harder," he said.

The story was produced by California Watch, a project of the Center for Investigative Reporting. Learn more at www.californiawatch.org.

More by Tia Ghose

Sorry, no stories found.

Sponsored by

Tucson weather

Weather data not available

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.