Every week copyright holders send out millions of takedown notices to websites all across the Internet. While the majority of these claims are legitimate, a healthy percentage are not. These "errors" can cause serious harm to the public, but the senders are never held responsible for their mistakes. Perhaps it's time to punish repeat senders of bogus takedown notices?

Yes, copyright holders are entitled to protect their content from being pirated, but whether they should be able to do this at all costs is up for debate.

In recent months the number of takedown requests sent out by copyright holders has increased dramatically, and we’re now at a point where it’s starting to turn the Internet into a big mess.

Just to give an idea of the scope of the issue, Google previously noted that 37% of all DMCA notices they receive are not valid copyright claims.

One of the problems is that many rightsholders use completely automated systems to inform Google and other sites of infringements. They claim to have a good faith belief that their notices are correct, but we question that this is always the case.

Since most websites simply don’t have the resources to check the validity of these bogus notices, content is then censored in error.

The effects of these “errors” are often without any real harm, and in many cases the public doesn’t even notice. Actually, they can be quite entertaining when they lead to self-censorship. When Microsoft asks Google to censor Bing for example, or when Warner wants to takedown the IMDb page of their own movie.

In other instances bogus takedowns are becoming at the very least somewhat of an annoyance.

And when the responsible copyright holders are asked to explain their false claims they always seem to shrug them off as insignificant incidents.

Unfortunately, these ‘incidents’ sometimes cause serious damage. Earlier this week a Mediafire user lost access to her files because of a bogus notice. Or what about the Dajaz1 and Rojadirecta websites that lost their domain names because of copyright infringement claims that didn’t stand up?

We can go on, and on, and on, and on…..

We’re not exaggerating when we say that things are spiraling out of control. Rightsholders are censoring large parts of the Internet, often completely unfounded, and there is absolutely no one to hold them responsible.

Websites can’t possibly verify every DMCA claim and the problem will only increase as more takedown notices are sent week after week.

Right now rightsholders and the anti-piracy outfits they employ have absolutely no incentive to improve the accuracy of their automated takedown systems, so perhaps it’s time for them to be held responsible.

A three-strikes system might be appropriate here, where repeat offenders are forbidden from sending any notices for at least a month.