Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

To ask a question that assumes the answer contained therein, and then assume others might be able to decipher the meaning of said question is tantamount to the contradiction of the initial premise, which is baseless in as much as the referent isn't clearly stated as an objective fact, but is rather an objectification of the presumed false premise and a nullification of the foundation on which the entire argument is based.

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

I know what you're thinking, 'cause right now I'm thinking the same thing. Actually, I've been thinking it ever since I got here: Why oh why didn't I take the BLUE pill?

To ask a question that assumes the answer contained therein, and then assume others might be able to decipher the meaning of said question is tantamount to the contradiction of the initial premise, which is baseless in as much as the referent isn't clearly stated as an objective fact, but is rather an objectification of the presumed false premise and a nullification of the foundation on which the entire argument is based.