Usually when it's too good to be true it is... Lance, 70's Steelers, McGwire/Sosa, all Olympians, Bonds, Braun, Patriots "dynasty", USC championships (coach then??) , 49er's Cap cheating scandal etc. etc. How did all of those late round DB's they have get so good. The proof is in the prior suspensions. Are there not 7 prior suspensions in the last 2 years??

Didn't the broncos get busted for cap cheating during there Superbowl wins? Not trying to troll but giving them examples and leaving out the broncos on that is lame.

It's funny how you whine about this yet don't acknowledge Denver has 1 less PED suspension over same time frame.

Hey **** Face.. Since 2011 its 6 players to our 1 suspended by the NFL and it should be 7 to 1 had Sherman not gotten off on a technicality. And not only that but our 1 didnt play in the game! You want the link ****face, because unlike you, I dont talk out of my ass.

Hey **** Face.. Since 2011 its 6 players to our 1 suspended by the NFL and it should be 7 to 1 had Sherman not gotten off on a technicality. And not only that but our 1 didnt play in the game! You want the link ****face, because unlike you, I dont talk out of my ass.

Hey **** Face.. Since 2011 its 6 players to our 1 suspended by the NFL and it should be 7 to 1 had Sherman not gotten off on a technicality. And not only that but our 1 didnt play in the game! You want the link ****face, because unlike you, I dont talk out of my ass.

Denver has had 4 in the same time frame as Seahawks since Carroll BTW. You are the moron whining about suspensions saying it effected the game. Its not ky fault if you are so dense to think Denver has angels on their team. http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/b...45&src=desktop

Hey **** Face.. Since 2011 its 6 players to our 1 suspended by the NFL and it should be 7 to 1 had Sherman not gotten off on a technicality. And not only that but our 1 didnt play in the game! You want the link ****face, because unlike you, I dont talk out of my ass.

A couple of those instances did not play for the Seahawks this year (or ever) in non-preseason games. Two more (Browner & Thurmond) were violations of the substance abuse policy, NOT the performance enhancing policy. Do you understand the difference yet?

A couple of those instances did not play for the Seahawks this year (or ever) in non-preseason games. Two more (Browner & Thurmond) were violations of the substance abuse policy, NOT the performance enhancing policy. Do you understand the difference yet?

lol. wrong...

"Six Seahawks have broken the policy for what has been assumed to be for Adderall, those players include John Moffit, Allen Barbre, Winston Guy, Brandon Browner, Richard Sherman, and Bruce Irvin." see Brandon Browner??

And this.... straight from Sherman's big ****ing mouth: "Asked if the Seattle Seahawks have a problem with performance-enhancing drugs with five player suspensions since 2011, cornerback Richard Sherman told ESPN The Magazine, “it does seem that way.”

Sherman, who was suspended last season for allegedly using Adderall only to have the ban overturned on appeal last December, said of the Seahawks’ perceived PED problem: “It is what it is.”

"Six Seahawks have broken the policy for what has been assumed to be for Adderall, those players include John Moffit, Allen Barbre, Winston Guy, Brandon Browner, Richard Sherman, and Bruce Irvin." see Beandon Browner??

And this.... straight from Sherman's big ****ing mouth: "Asked if the Seattle Seahawks have a problem with performance-enhancing drugs with five player suspensions since 2011, cornerback Richard Sherman told ESPN The Magazine, “it does seem that way.”

Sherman, who was suspended last season for allegedly using Adderall only to have the ban overturned on appeal last December, said of the Seahawks’ perceived PED problem: “It is what it is.”

"Six Seahawks have broken the policy for what has been assumed to be for Adderall, those players include John Moffit, Allen Barbre, Winston Guy, Brandon Browner, Richard Sherman, and Bruce Irvin." see Brandon Browner??

And this.... straight from Sherman's big ****ing mouth: "Asked if the Seattle Seahawks have a problem with performance-enhancing drugs with five player suspensions since 2011, cornerback Richard Sherman told ESPN The Magazine, “it does seem that way.”

Sherman, who was suspended last season for allegedly using Adderall only to have the ban overturned on appeal last December, said of the Seahawks’ perceived PED problem: “It is what it is.”

In the post I responded to you said SEVEN Seahawks. Your new link says
SIX. You left off Walter Thurmond this time, maybe because you understand the difference now between the substance abuse policy and the performance enhancing policy. The other violation on your initial link that was for substance abuse, not PED, was Brandon Browner's most recent suspension. His first was PED, and his second was substance abuse. (Someone should really update that wiki article into separate lists for each policy.)

Allen Barbre never played for us.

Richard Sherman's was overturned because of evidence contamination - the tester moved his sample from a leaking container into a cup that was already opened. You seem to be bigoted against all things Seahawks, so I know you won't believe anything but the worst about them, but the NFL's own arbitration panel decided in Sherman's favor. That is a rare thing. Your most recent link was also written before Sherman won his appeal.

Winston Guy & John Moffitt are no longer with the Seahawks, and didn't do much when they were here. That leaves Irvin & Browner. Irvin is a middling player right now, and Browner's replacement has played better than he has.

If any of those four guys were on PEDs, it didn't help the Seahawks get where they are now. They're replacement level or worse (on our roster).

Regarding Sherman's statement - "It does seem that way." and "It is what it is." are nuanced ways of saying "No comment. We both know the number of suspensions." He is saying very little. I'll point out again that the Seahawks would be about as good as they are now if they never had Barbre, Irvin, Moffit, Guy, or Browner.

In the post I responded to you said SEVEN Seahawks. Your new link says
SIX. You left off Walter Thurmond this time, maybe because you understand the difference now between the substance abuse policy and the performance enhancing policy. The other violation on your initial link that was for substance abuse, not PED, was Brandon Browner's most recent suspension. His first was PED, and his second was substance abuse. (Someone should really update that wiki article into separate lists for each policy.)

Allen Barbre never played for us.

Richard Sherman's was overturned because of evidence contamination - the tester moved his sample from a leaking container into a cup that was already opened. You seem to be bigoted against all things Seahawks, so I know you won't believe anything but the worst about them, but the NFL's own arbitration panel decided in Sherman's favor. That is a rare thing. Your most recent link was also written before Sherman won his appeal.

Winston Guy & John Moffitt are no longer with the Seahawks, and didn't do much when they were here. That leaves Irvin & Browner. Irvin is a middling player right now, and Browner's replacement has played better than he has.

If any of those four guys were on PEDs, it didn't help the Seahawks get where they are now. They're replacement level or worse (on our roster).

Regarding Sherman's statement - "It does seem that way." and "It is what it is." are nuanced ways of saying "No comment. We both know the number of suspensions." He is saying very little. I'll point out again that the Seahawks would be about as good as they are now if they never had Barbre, Irvin, Moffit, Guy, or Browner.

It doesnt take a genius to figure out that there is a culture of drug use with this team. The fact that so many of their DB's were caught proves that. Just how the Steel Curtain in the 70's used steroids before anyone else or how the 90's Texas Rangers were the first in MLB. Have you not followed the steroids issue in baseball at all? That's how most players start using- they pass it around the locker room. And I'm sorry, but "It does seem that way" does not translate to "no comment"! And Im not even going to waste my time trying to explain that to you because its common sense.

It doesnt take a genius to figure out that there is a culture of drug use with this team. The fact that so many of their DB's were caught proves that. Just how the Steel Curtain in the 70's used steroids before anyone else or how the 90's Texas Rangers were the first in MLB. Have you not followed the steroids issue in baseball at all? That's how most players start using- they pass it around the locker room. And I'm sorry, but "It does seem that way" does not translate to "no comment"! And Im not even going to waste my time trying to explain that to you because its common sense.

If there's an asterisk next to this Seattle superbowl win, do you agree that there should be an asterisk next to the Broncos superbowl wins for their salary cap violations?