This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ PrePrints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

Abstract

Nowadays molecular approaches are being used in population estimation of terrestrial nematode communities offering a more efficient and faster alternative over microscopy-based methods. A molecular profiling tool was developed using directed Terminal-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (dT-RFLP) to characterize soil nematode assemblages by relative abundance of feeding guilds, and validated by comparison with traditional morphological method. Combining morphological and molecular analysis of benthic nematodes assemblages, the main aim of this study was to develop and validate the dT-RFLP tool for benthic nematodes. Estimation of population size was derived using real time PCR (qPCR). A molecular phylogenetic analysis of benthic nematodes was created based on a database of 18S rDNA sequences related to individuals identified to species level. dT-RFLP results showed that the digest strategy developed for soil nematodes was not suitable for benthic nematodes. A new dT-RFLP strategy for benthic assemblages was designed by using the sequence database coupled with cloning and sequencing the whole assemblage from five samples. Several solutions were identified by the DRAT software and tested empirically to select the optimum solution that separates the assemblages. qPCR results showed differences in gene copy number between two sampling sites, which is consistently with the results of nematode density obtained by traditional methods. The application of these high-throughput molecular approaches for benthic nematodes will improve sample throughput and their implementation more efficient and faster as an indicator of marine ecosystem health.

Author Comment

This is an abstract which has been accepted for the "MARES" Conference

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ana Patrícia Avó conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tim Daniell conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Helena Adão conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

FCT and Repository of University of Évora

Funding

The present study was supported by FCT (Portuguese National Board of Scientific Research) through CoolNematode Project (EXPL/MAR-EST/0553/2013) and and ProMira (PROMAR) (31-03-02-FEP-006). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Follow this preprint for updates

"Following" is like subscribing to any updates related to a preprint.
These updates will appear in your home dashboard each time you visit PeerJ.

You can also choose to receive updates via daily or weekly email digests.
If you are following multiple preprints then we will send you
no more than one email per day or week based on your preferences.

Note: You are now also subscribed to the subject areas of this preprint
and will receive updates in the daily or weekly email digests if turned on.
You can add specific subject areas through your profile settings.