Archive

“Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.” – Frederic Bastiat

Pundits, pontificators and plebeians all have polarized around the issue of national healthcare.Many have spoken wisely on the pros and cons of the proposed system, a heartening fact given the relative deafening silence when it came to the other government boondoggles of the last few years (really the last hundred to be exact).At the heart of the matter is a debate fundamental to our liberty that the public has failed to have.This regards the broader ramifications of a government-granted right to health.

Aristotle said that man seeks pleasure while avoiding pain.Healthcare is a means to prevent physical pain, and thus I would argue secure pleasure.However, a need for healthcare is dictated by one’s physical condition.One’s physical condition is attributable to a variety of factors.First, there is the question of diet.Then, there are one’s living conditions, namely shelter and clothing.Surely there is a psychosomatic factor as well.Finally of course, there is the question of one’s physical activity level.

If we are to allow healthcare to fall under the purview of government, then certainly it must follow that all things that contribute to one’s health must also be regulated by the government.

Thus, necessarily each and every citizen will have a responsibility to provide ample food, sufficient shelter and clean clothing for each and every other citizen.Likewise, it should follow that the types of food be regulated to ensure an optimal diet, and the shelter and clothing be comfortable enough and of high enough quality to meet government standards.Since one needs a stable living environment, should not the government also have a say as to how children are raised within their homes?Naturally one’s mental health might also be tied to access to diversions, so should not all entertainment such as the arts, film and sports also be government-controlled and taxpayer-subsidized?Should not exercise be mandated, with government-run physical fitness centers for all?What scares me most is that in writing this list, government already controls many of these things in one way or another.

Naturally, a government-run system of healthcare will lead to arbitrary, whimsical intrusions into our daily lives. Who is to set the bounds as to what constitutes proper controls to make the system “competitive” and “affordable,” when the Ezekiel Emanuel’s of the world will influence the system?

Much like the Necessary and Proper Clause, nationalized healthcare will serve as a Trojan horse; it will lead to the greatest infringement on our natural rights of all, infringement on our lives.You’d think the state would already be satisfied having devoured our liberty and property (pursuit of happiness if you prefer), but always hungry for more power, under this system it will get personal.

Perhaps scarier than the details of this system, devilish as they may be is the principle that from the first day we spend on this Earth, given a right to health for all, our responsibility will be to provide for our fellow man, valuing the community above ourselves.If one were to choose to dedicate one’s life to supporting others, of one’s own volition, than this would be fine.The merits of sacrifice for others are numerous and in many cases commendable.However, under a national healthcare system, because of a handful of politicians, we will be forced from day one to work to support everyone else, because the state says so.In the end, we will all be enslaved to each other.Our common lot will be one of misery.

Call me selfish.Call me greedy.Call me immoral.I value my life above yours, insofar as the Leviathan is forcing me to subsidize your eating habits, drinking habits, smoking habits mental health and genetic predisposition.I do not want to be forced to pay for your healthcare by government decree, nor should I.The Founders guarantees my right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.To presuppose that the collectives’ right supersedes my own destroys these very rights.It ensures pain for all and pleasure for none.

I leave you with some prescient words from Grover Cleveland – the last respectable Democrat – regarding his reasoning for rejection of an act to appropriate federal funds for drought-stricken Texas farmers.He declared:

The friendliness and charity of our countrymen can always be relied upon to relieve their fellow-citizens in misfortune.This has been repeatedly and quite lately demonstrated.Federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the Government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character, while it prevents the indulgence among our people of the kindly sentiment and conduct which strengthens the bonds of a common brotherhood.