In California, the showdown is fast approaching for parents, those employed by the state’s school systems and those at many levels of the healthcare system. A choice will need to be made for or against health freedom, individual choice and the future of medicine. Like many instances throughout history, political corruption, corporate monopolies and authoritarian control has forced good people to fight for their future and the future of their children.

The California medical community is now staring down the challenge of their lifetime. Senate Bill 277 (SB 277) will act as a filter to activate those within medical and political systems to once again step into their power and find their souls. The flawed political system, pharmaceutically-captured individuals and press who have forced risky for-profit medicine upon the population are not stopping. They can’t be reasoned with and their delayed responses to the valid questions from the California people will stand no longer.

Another leaked document has surfaced showing that behind the official SB 277 rhetoric — proven to be lies from the get go — is a historically tyrannical system racing for the finish line. While the California public wrestles with the recent leaked internal document from the Santa Barbara Health Department, the Cooperative of American Physicians (CAP) has now also been caught in a behind the scenes overreach to sell out and undermine the California medical community. The CAP is a physician-owned and operated cooperative that provides liability coverage. Their recent internal newsletter to members of the medical community gives a purposely skewed version of reality whose aims appear to misdirect its members away from medical choice. After outlining the specifics of SB 277, the CAP newsletter concludes with the following:

“If there is no legitimate reason the child should not be vaccinated, then the parents are refusing recommended treatment. The American Academy of Pediatrics has published an Informed Refusal that doctors should place in the patient's charts. It is the physician’s choice whether to continue to treat the child based on this refusal, which indicates a breakdown in the physician-patient relationship. The child may be discontinued from the practice using recommended guidelines.”

The gravity of this apparent medical coercion and false interpretation of parental choice and the physician-patient relationship by CAP is highly concerning. A new overarching and erroneous theme in California medicine — now inaccurately accepted and disseminated by CAP — is that laws for school attendance have no standing or business being lumped together to define or influence the physician-patient relationship once considered sacrosanct. Furthermore, the CAP directives make the false point that if the patient has no contraindications to vaccination, the physician is to either get them vaccinated or kick them out of their practice. At a time when vaccinations carrying inherent risks are being mandated by legal force, CAP’s directives rapidly undermine healing and the medical community at large. Reading between the lines, the logical next step for California doctors that do not force vaccinate will lose their medical insurance to practice at the hands of CAP.

According to CAP’s advice, “legitimate” is not defined and therefore appears to be defaulted to SB 277’s definitions of exemption which has been a moving goalpost from the beginning. Parents having the choice to “refuse recommended treatment” is the essence of health freedom, informed consent and medical choice. The doctor works for the patient and not the other way around.

CAP recommends that doctors make parents sign the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Informed Refusal form to be added to the patient's permanent file. In America’s current environment, this simple record keeping act will be enough to start a case with Child Protective Services for neglect. Doctors must understand the gravity of their actions and their subservient place in health and healing below not only the child-parent bond and choice, but also in the physician-patient relationship.

Furthermore, AAP’s Informed Refusal form is predicated upon the fact that doctors gave parents full informed consent before their parental decision to not vaccinate was made. Full informed consent includes discussing all the risks and complications that are common and inherent with vaccination (a medical procedure) in addition to allowing the parent to view the actual vaccine insert. How many doctors and nurses are allowing this level of true informed consent right now?

Without first giving full informed consent, doctors who force parents to sign AAP’s Informed Refusal document are willfully acting against their sworn medical ethics in addition to possibly violating U.S. Code § 1324c pertaining to document fraud. Under section 2, the U.S. Code states that “It is unlawful for any person or entity knowingly to use, attempt to use or provide a falsely made document in order to satisfy any requirement…”. Since AAP’s Informed Refusal form states “This form may be used as a template…that may be modified to reflect the particular circumstances of a patient, family, or medical practice”, any physician or practice that has intentionally altered AAP's document to suit their needs and are are demanding parents sign it with the intention of doing or not doing an act to the parent and/or child appears to be in violation of the U.S. Code.

According to the U.S. code, to"falsely make any document for the purpose of satisfying a requirement” means to prepare or provide a document, with knowledge or in reckless disregard of the fact that the application or document contains a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or material representation, or has no basis in law or fact, or otherwise fails to state a fact which is material to the purpose for which it was submitted.”

From the start, SB 277 has been a power grab to secure profit margins and bottom lines at the expense of your children while simultaneously upending and redefining modern medicine and healing as we know it. SB 277 and its perpetrators continue to act in the shadows. Their doublespeak rhetoric excels at acting upon grey areas to push damaging, profit-driven medical initiatives concocted solely by pharmaceutical company think tanks to maximize business. On July 1, Californians will be forced to activate. What side of history will you be on?