You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, Join Chevy Cruze Forum : Chevrolet Cruze Forums today!

Electrically driven turbos

No, not the ebay special that promise 1 psi

Thinking about turbo lag and heat problems. Part of the heat issue and lag is the way the turbine is spun - with exhaust. Why not make the turbo more like a centrifugal supercharger but instead of spinning the turbine with the belt or exhaust, why not spin it with an electric motor? Electric motors are good enough to drive hybrids. They have no torque curve, it's instant torque from 0 - infinity RPM's. The turbine could spin instantly and make lag a thing of the past.

I can't see any parasitic loss occurring from powering a motor. I'm sure some smart people could come up with something. So why havent we? You wouldn't need all that complex piping and you'd reduce the heat and lag.

Thinking about turbo lag and heat problems. Part of the heat issue and lag is the way the turbine is spun - with exhaust. Why not make the turbo more like a centrifugal supercharger but instead of spinning the turbine with the belt or exhaust, why not spin it with an electric motor? Electric motors are good enough to drive hybrids. They have no torque curve, it's instant torque from 0 - infinity RPM's. The turbine could spin instantly and make lag a thing of the past.

I can't see any parasitic loss occurring from powering a motor. I'm sure some smart people could come up with something. So why havent we? You wouldn't need all that complex piping and you'd reduce the heat and lag.

Why not? I'm not an engineer so tell me where my thinking is flawed.

The thing I see wrong with it would be loss of mpg due to it not reusing non burnt fuel and the power would be therw but you would have to design it differently than anything we've seen then how would you lubricate the turbine and also you have to think how long will the electric motor last compared to normal turbos and the heat would still be therw due to friction just not like it is with exhaust.

The thing I see wrong with it would be loss of mpg due to it not reusing non burnt fuel and the power would be therw but you would have to design it differently than anything we've seen then how would you lubricate the turbine and also you have to think how long will the electric motor last compared to normal turbos and the heat would still be therw due to friction just not like it is with exhaust.

Sent from my Droid using AutoGuide.Com Free App

Turbo's do not recycle unburnt fuel. It may ignite inside of the turbine to help propel it, but it does not make it's way back into the engine. Any unburnt fuel will recirculated through any emissions system (e.g. the EGR).

1) How do centrifugal superchargers lubricate themselves? Last one I dealt with had ceramic bearings that were doused in oil.
2) The turbo would remain the same. The only different is that a motor would drive the turbine instead of exhaust.
3) What makes you think an electric motor wouldn't outlast the engine?

It never worked in the past because you simply needed MUCH too much power and large electric motors with banks of batteries. That said, you might be able to get away with less on such a small displacement motor if you're only using it to reduce turbo lag.

However, a pulley driven and clutch-engaged (similar to an A/C compressor) centrifugal turbine would be in my opinion a better option.

"When freedom is at odds with government policy, one of two things eventually happens: Either freedom is crushed, or political leaders are forced out in disgrace and replaced with guardians of individual liberty."

"...the Supreme Court has ruled that the right to keep and bear arms exists independently of the Second Amendment...the Bill of Rights is a reminder to the government, not [an] authorization..."

It never worked in the past because you simply needed MUCH too much power and large electric motors with banks of batteries. That said, you might be able to get away with less on such a small displacement motor if you're only using it to reduce turbo lag.

However, a pulley driven and clutch-engaged (similar to an A/C compressor) centrifugal turbine would be in my opinion a better option.

pulley driven systems are limited by RPM and pulley size (multiplication). if you had an electric motor driving it, you could control the motor to provide a custom profile not achievable with a pulley drive.

Banks of batteries? While I agree that a beefy alternator or some other power supply would be needed, I don't think it would be that extreme But again, I have no idea. I don't see it being done and there has to be a reason.

I'm sure we could easily do some math and determine what kind of motor would be needed and it's requirements.

pulley driven systems are limited by RPM and pulley size (multiplication). if you had an electric motor driving it, you could control the motor to provide a custom profile not achievable with a pulley drive.

Banks of batteries? While I agree that a beefy alternator or some other power supply would be needed, I don't think it would be that extreme But again, I have no idea. I don't see it being done and there has to be a reason.

I'm sure we could easily do some math and determine what kind of motor would be needed and it's requirements.

Indeed, pulley driven systems are limited by RPM, but you won't need much to alleviate turbo lag. Keep that in mind. This is simply a complement to the existing turbo.

It has been done before, and it did require a bank of batteries and three large motors. You simply don't have enough electricity for sustained use to produce the amount of constant pressure you would need. That, and you also have to make it worth the extra weight you're adding.

"When freedom is at odds with government policy, one of two things eventually happens: Either freedom is crushed, or political leaders are forced out in disgrace and replaced with guardians of individual liberty."

"...the Supreme Court has ruled that the right to keep and bear arms exists independently of the Second Amendment...the Bill of Rights is a reminder to the government, not [an] authorization..."

Besides, there's better turbo technologies out there that can help reduce or prevent lag.

BMW uses two small turbos to provide consistent power throughout the rev range. Ford's diesel uses twin-scroll turbos that essentially incorporate a small and large turbocharger into one for both low-end power (and little lag) and good top-end power. Dodge's diesel uses a variable geometry turbocharger with movable fins to get the same effect.

Both may become commonplace as gasoline engines continue to be downsized and the technology comes down in price/up in reliability.

"When freedom is at odds with government policy, one of two things eventually happens: Either freedom is crushed, or political leaders are forced out in disgrace and replaced with guardians of individual liberty."

"...the Supreme Court has ruled that the right to keep and bear arms exists independently of the Second Amendment...the Bill of Rights is a reminder to the government, not [an] authorization..."

The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.

AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.