One issue that speaks strongly against Knox's versions of facts, is the accusations she made against her boss.

Making false statements like that is such an outlandish act of fabrication, that she should be forced to spend 3 years in prison, just for being such an outrageous liar.

In fact, if she has not spent the entire time in prison for the lies and slander, they should take her into custody tomorrow, and let her cool her heels in prison awaiting the final outcome.

Diane Sawyer did her little biased hack job last night on 20/20. The whole propaganda piece was so staged, that I would assume that that TV "news" show was drawn up and crafted by a professional publicity crew.

The way she feigns being the aggrieved victim with the quaver in her voice, and the way Knox plays the brave fighter underdog with "I will FIGHT this, and I will NEVER go back. They will have to drag me out kicking and screaming."

She was hoping, when she said that, that nobody makes the obvious connection to her victim who struggled screaming, and kicking, as Knox and the nig tortured and raped Kercher to a grotesque bloody death.

Now that's it's all breaking down, it is not beyond possibility that the Italian Harry Potter stud will turn on her .

Usually cannabis does cause that kind of deranged deviant behavior.

I wonder if Knox and the nig were not drunk and hopped up on shizzurip purple drank, or something like bath salts. Not that's there's any physical evidence of shizzurip. It just seems like they act like it.

Sort of like when kiddies like Skittles Martin, and Bieber get hopped up and go to acting out . That's not a typical reaction to just cannabis

I watched her on TV last night. I think she might be a sociopath, but I still don't think she's guilty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrMensa

One issue that speaks strongly against Knox's versions of facts, is the accusations she made against her boss.

I found her explanation of that convincing. She texted him "See you later" which police took to mean they met up that night, and kept telling her she was wrong over and over when she says that they didn't meet that night, that by 'later' she meant just the next time they would see each other (that that statement in Italian means very soon). That they interrogated her for a long time and kept feeding her things saying she had amnesia, and that they know she met up, "don't you remember now?"

That black man's DNA was found there, and his foot prints and hand prints were all there in her blood. Neither Knox or her boyfriend's DNA (a little on the knife does not count, it was hers that she used in the kitchen) was found, nor were their handprints or footprints. She and her boyfriend were seen that night at his apartment, the only one that claims he saw Knocks was the black man we know was involved in the killing (of coarse he's going to try to push the blame on someone else). And that black man fled the country that very night.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrMensa

She was hoping, when she said that, that nobody makes the obvious connection to her victim who struggled screaming, and kicking, as Knox and the nig tortured and raped Kercher to a grotesque bloody death.

Why do you think Knox was involved?

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteRights

Notice that she only burst into tears after being questioned at length, perhaps realizing that she wasn't going to get away with it. The only time Amanda Knox cries is when she's feeling sorry for herself.

I think she's a sociopath, but that doesn't make her a killer. I see no evidence that she did it.

The way she feigns being the aggrieved victim with the quaver in her voice, and the way Knox plays the brave fighter underdog with "I will FIGHT this, and I will NEVER go back. They will have to drag me out kicking and screaming."

A lot of murderers do get dragged off kicking and screaming. Lucky for her there's no death penalty in Italy and even luckier for her that she probably won't be deported because this is seen as "double jeopardy."

Quote:

She was hoping, when she said that, that nobody makes the obvious connection to her victim who struggled screaming, and kicking, as Knox and the nig tortured and raped Kercher to a grotesque bloody death.

I don't think Knox would think that because Knox is a sociopath. She NEVER thinks about the suffering of her victim. It's all about Knox and HER suffering.

Oh by the way, if Knox and Sollecito didn't participate in the assault and hold down the arms of Kercher, who did? And why did Knox back out of an offer to take a lie detector test?

__________________

Luke 22:36 (Jesus speaking to his disciples said) "...if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one."

Now that's it's all breaking down, it is not beyond possibility that the Italian Harry Potter stud will turn on her .

....

He wouldn't back up her early claim that she had stayed at his apartment the night of the murder.

Now he's looking at 25 years in prison. He's got nothing to lose now.

The only way to trust ANY of the culprits would be to hook them up to lie detectors and have them say exactly what happened that night.

If Guede and Sollecito refuse to take lie detector tests, it means both of them participated in the murder, and they would not benefit from the truth coming out.

Remember that Knox sat for four long years in jail. If she were innocent, she could have taken a lie detector test, but never did, to prove herself innocent of the murder.

There are sophisticated lie detector tests available now that use brain scans as opposed to relying on the old galvanic skin response. These should be used to resolve any complicated cases. Jewish lawyers however will fight any use of lie detectors because most Jewish liars get rich by getting guilty people out of jams by skirting around and confusing the facts of the case.

There are two reasons why Knox/Sollecito were released on appeal subsequent to their original trial. One is that the star witness placing them near the murder house was discredited as a homeless drug-addict/'professional witness' dealing heroin from his park bench. He is now deceased.

The other is because the 'Double-DNA' knife/bra clasp forensics was shot down by court-appointed, independent experts. They detailed gross negligence on the part of the forensic scientist responsible for the testing, Patricia Stefanoni. For one thing, despite the fact that the lab was full of Kercher's DNA, no control tests were done to eliminate the possibility of contamination in the lab.

When the test kept coming back negative she overode the machine parameters past the point of reliability until producing the results she needed to satisfy her boss- a consultant for the prosecution. There is no confirmed DNA belonging to Kercher on the knife.

Where is the knife that caused Kercher's throat wounds? Where is the knife that left the imprint on the bedsheet? The 'Double DNA' knife was too big to have done either. Are we to believe that Knox/Sollecito expertly hid one murder weapon (along with their blood splattered clothing/shoes) and then returned the 'other murder weapon' to Sollecito's kitchen drawer? The appeals court did not believe this- and reached the logical decision.

True enough, but what I was referencing is the fact that the Italian authorities released Amanda and she returned to her own country. It is unlikely she is a murderess.

The rest is all double jeopardy in what must be one of the most corrupt countries in Europe.

As Brendan Behan said:

When I came back to Dublin I was court-martialed in my absence and sentenced to death in my absence, so I said they could shoot me in my absence.

From Waaay Out West,

~HLM

I agree. She DID SERVE time THERE. THEY are the ones who RELEASED her. She returned to America. And now they want to retry her for the same crime? Italy needs to accept this as THEIR FAULT and just bring it to a halt. It is not like she was convicted then fled immediately to the states in order to avoid jail time. She DID serve time THERE.

Whatever happened in her past, was her past. People should not continue to bring up her dirty laundry to justify why "she is guilty".

If only the "low information types" could get beyond the childish propaganda attempts. .. Watching Diane Sawyer on 20/20 going through that scripted push piece does not help.
Making up horrendous lies -as Knox is proven to have done, is not "dirty laundry".

Dirty laundry would be Knox's rabbit ear vibrator, --silly stuff like that. Knox's initial long hard tall tale, that she was taking some long hard Italian pipe that night (?!) --now that might be characterized as dirty laundry.

But let's remember, that Knox herself was the one who offered that little tidbit up. She is the one who claimed that they were somewhere else "doing it" when their victim was murdered.

The lies she initially tried to throw out amount to several things beyond "dirty laundry".

For one, she was tried on the separate issue of the lies she told, and found guilty of slander.

For another, with all the propaganda and biased reporting done by Diane Sawyer, and Knox's snibel-faced lawyer, they really don't mention the fact that Knox was found guilty of lying and given a three year sentence on her lies alone.l!!

Oh wait --she did address the lies. Now the propaganda machine publishing the story line wants us to believe that the Italian police made her tell all the lies.

But if you take into account what Knox tried to say when she started out her nasty little lie fest, --and then see how she tried to turn on a dime and say she was not even there, to -- ya I WAS there and I heard the screams, and there was this other n1gger who did it.

The lies she started out with hung her. Of course it was the police's fault that she told the lies. She did not have a lawyer there handling the lies and obfuscation.

Her Italian Harry Potter stud broke first. They questioned them separately. The beasts. Without being able to coordinate their stories, Knox's initial attempts at an alibi were turned back on her.

So the lies she told to try to establish an alibi, are not to be trivialized as "dirty laundry" Those lies actually cross the line into criminal false reporting to police, -and they transgress the ten commandments. And they insult the intelligence of someone who is informed.

There is just too MUCH stuff to explain away with her, too many "well maybe it was this" -'s.

Well "maybe" she was doing yoga instead of cartwheels. Well "maybe" she was in shock and acted gleeful instead of shocked and sorrowful because "everyone expresses grief differently". (Despite ALL of Kercher's [other] friends sobbing.) Well "maybe" she was in such shock that she didn't immediately proclaim her horror, sorrow, and innocence she had to dance around with weak worded statements. "Maybe" this and "maybe" that. How many "maybe"s will this girl be given? Apparently there is no limit.

If she was ugly or male (or non-American) there would be far less sympathy. A cute face goes a long way.