PHOENIX — Furthering two news events, President Trump called attention to baby Charlie Gard in early July and former Sheriff Joe Arpaio in late August.
The seriously ill English baby was unknown to many before Trump tweeted his offer of assistance, which cast the president in a more sympathetic light while many news organizations took an impartial look at the case of the suffering infant being denied vital medical treatment.
Arizonan Arpaio, well-known for discouraging illegal immigration, was saddled with burdens of media bias that favors open borders. But in providing a pardon to Arpaio, recently convicted of misdemeanor criminal contempt of court, Trump said nothing to refute assertions that both he and the Italian-heritage Arizonan are bigots, one aiding the other.
This could have been a teachable time, but a passive approach hardly enhanced either Trump’s or Arpaio’s reputation.
Even though the August 25 White House news release noted Arpaio’s admirable long career in public service including law enforcement, a life of good deeds may not outweigh subsequent criminal activity.
However, the White House didn’t call necessary attention to the highly questionable path that led to his conviction on July 31.
Moreover, the intensification of legal proceedings against Arpaio suspiciously coincided with last year’s election-year calendar, focusing pressure as he sought a seventh four-year term as sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona’s most populous county by far. Phoenix is the county seat.
Even if Arpaio had signed a confession of guilt in his own blood, the administration of justice couldn’t fairly proceed under an official who vowed his deep enmity to the sheriff. If Arpaio was guilty beyond doubt, he still shouldn’t have been at the mercy of a man unfit to sit in judgment of his case, G. Murray Snow.
Arpaio’s case first had gone to Bill Clinton-appointed federal Judge Mary Murguia, whose sister Janet astoundingly happened to be the leader of the racially divisive National Council of La Raza, which despised Arpaio. The sheriff successfully had her recused.
Out of the frying pan, into the fire. Enter Federal Judge Snow, who proceeded to pursue Arpaio beginning in 2009.
Appointed by open-borders President George W. Bush in 2007, Snow devised his orders for how carefully Arpaio and his staff must behave in a state overrun with massive illegal immigration, where the large majority of border violators are Latinos, as one might expect when Mexico serves as a funnel for all Latin lands into the Grand Canyon State.
Remarkably, Snow decided Arpaio engaged in racial profiling.
With the backing of open-borders Barack Obama’s politicized Department of Justice, Snow finally ran Arpaio to ground, referring him for criminal contempt of court shortly before Arizona’s primary election on August 30, 2016. Still, Arpaio easily won that GOP primary.
Then, the month before last November’s general election, Obama’s Justice Department said it was charging Arpaio with the criminal offense. Although some polling had shown a competitive race against George Soros-funded Democrat Paul Penzone, Arpaio went on to lose by about 12 points.
After Trump’s recent pardon was attacked sharply, retired attorney and blogger Paul Mirengoff raised an issue on August 29 at the PowerLine blog that was familiar to many Arizonans but usually ignored by Arizona’s dominant media and nationally. This is a major reason social media have won such wide acceptance. They unlock concealed facts.
Arguing that Arpaio’s political foes were out to punish him because the sheriff tried to fill the void caused by the federal government refusing to enforce immigration law, Mirengoff turned for evidence to Ronald Rotunda, a distinguished professor of jurisprudence at Southern California’s Chapman University School of Law.
The blog article was headlined, “Did Joe Arpaio receive a fair hearing from an unbiased judge?”
Rotunda had evaluated Snow’s bias in light of the judge’s wife declaring at a restaurant that Snow, as Arpaio phrased it, “wanted to do everything to make sure I’m not elected” again. Arpaio made this remark in 2015 as Show exceeded his judicial role by interrogating the sheriff from the bench.
Neither Snow nor his wife ever denied that statement, Rotunda said. The law professor added: “It should be obvious that whatever the duties of a federal judge are, that job description does not include conducting a judicial proceeding in a way to insure (sic) that Sheriff Arpaio is not elected, and to pursue an investigation that is even broader than that for what appears to be personal reasons.”
The professor noted that Snow engaged in conduct in court beyond his proper role.
Rotunda said he “asked leading questions, gave his own version of the facts, conducted his own investigation outside the courtroom, argued with witnesses, and was extremely interested in what evidence existed concerning the statement he made to his wife that he would do all that he could to make sure that Sheriff Arpaio is not elected.”
The Wanderer had reported accusations against Snow’s impartiality in 2015 in stories in its hardcopy editions of May 7 (p. 3A), May 14 (p. 8B), and June 4 (p. 4B).
Apparently recognizing how damaging the statement by Snow’s wife was, The Arizona Republic, the state’s largest daily newspaper, has twisted itself in knots to ignore, minimize, or distort the import of her words exposing her husband.
The Republic, which loathes Arpaio, can be viewed a leader among the state’s corrupt open-borders establishment.
In his critique, Rotunda said he “thought I should point out some factors that I have never read in the recent news articles about the pardon and some of the litigation that led to it.”
Let the Republic’s conduct shame itself. It could give lessons to bullies in some backwater Southern town in the 19th century. Or to propaganda doctors at old Soviet newspapers.
The day after Snow in court started interrogating Arpaio about what his wife said, the April 24, 2015, Republic stretched the story across the top of the front page under the misleading banner headline, “Arpaio: Judge’s wife targeted.”
The first paragraph said that in a “bombshell,” Arpaio testified that “his attorneys had hired a private agent to investigate the wife of the federal judge who ruled that the sheriff’s office had engaged in racial profiling.”
This “revelation was the result of direct questioning” by Snow himself, the second paragraph said.
Readers were left to wonder if the sheriff perhaps had been snooping scandalously on the wife’s romantic ties or banking activities or something else embarrassing that would enable Arpaio to apply inappropriate pressure against the judge.
Not until the ninth paragraph, back on the jump page, did readers learn that it wasn’t the judge’s wife who actually was the target, but Arpaio himself — the target of a judge who wanted to take the sheriff down.
The ninth paragraph said: “Arpaio said he had come into the possession of an email from a tipster who claimed to have met Snow’s wife at a restaurant, and that Snow’s wife said the judge ‘wanted to do everything to make sure I’m not elected’.”
So, Arpaio said, his counsel hired a private investigator to check the accuracy of this.
The 11th paragraph said: “‘Results confirmed that your wife was in that restaurant,’ Arpaio told Snow. ‘I guess (the investigator) talked to the witness, confirmed that that remark was made’.”
Aside from verifying the comment, the sheriff’s office did nothing further with it, an Arpaio aide said.
The Republic’s main editorial on its opinions page the same day, April 24, was even more scared of what Arpaio had said.
While blasting away with its usual contempt for Arpaio as “almost pitiable” and having a case “enough to make one’s skin crawl,” the paper’s editorial board waited until its 16th paragraph to squeak that “Arpaio acknowledged Judge Snow’s wife was investigated for something she purportedly said about the sheriff in a restaurant.”
Just “something she purportedly said”? No information about the Republic’s great hero Snow being so biased that he was out to finish off Arpaio?
In his analysis posted August 29 at the PowerLine blog, Rotunda suffered none of the 2015 Republic editorial’s squeamishness about the remarkable revelation. He wrote:
“One thing is very clear. Several witnesses heard Judge Snow’s wife say, in substance, that her husband (Judge Snow) wanted to do whatever he could to make sure that Sheriff Arpaio (was) not re-elected. The witnesses may not recall or agree on the exact language that Judge Snow’s wife used, but they do agree on the substance and import of the statement.”
Perhaps smarting a bit back in 2015 to guffaws about how it had twisted the bannered page one story, the Republic reluctantly returned to the issue shortly thereafter, posting an article on June 5, 2015, that was headlined, “Murray Snow: The man judging Sheriff Joe.”
After beginning with a puzzling declaration about federal judges speaking “like gods thundering down from the heavens,” the article went on to a sixth paragraph noting “statements Snow’s wife might have made in a restaurant about Snow’s supposed bias against Arpaio.”
The article acknowledged some debate around the courthouse of whether Snow’s personal interrogation of Arpaio went too far. The reporter’s 12th paragraph asked, “Or was he too political? Is it true, as a tipster told Arpaio, that Snow’s wife said the judge wanted Arpaio out of office? That would certainly suggest bias.”
Having mentioned the shocking comment in two paragraphs, the Republic dropped the topic entirely for the rest of the story, not even trying to suggest a resolution of the question.
Instead it meandered along for 33 more paragraphs, including quoting people praising Snow in language so fulsome as to be more suitable for an obituary.
Although the aliens-arresting Arpaio was almost a pitiable character with a case enough to make one’s skin crawl, this article saw Snow as a giant among men, a “straight shooter,” “open-minded,” “devout,” “warm and caring family man,” “incredibly compassionate,” “good at seeing the best in people.”
That’s the comic-book way the Republic deploys its demons and angels.

Political Correctness

Once Snow set Arpaio up for the criminal prosecution, Bill Clinton-appointed Federal Judge Susan Bolton conducted a brief bench trial and pronounced Arpaio guilty on July 31. Bolton was the same judge who put Arizona’s new law against illegal immigration on hold in 2010, SB 1070, until the Supreme Court could strike down most of it.
After the conviction, the September 3 Republic ran a poster-size illustration of Arpaio with his fist raised on the local-news front page, headlined, “What did Arpaio do wrong?” Aside from a shallow, two-column photo atop the next page of Arpaio holding his pardon, that entire broadsheet page was solid type purporting to answer this question. Nowhere was there mention of Snow’s determination to get Arpaio.
Donald Trump has shown some surprising defiance of “political correctness.” Perhaps now his Justice Department could take a look at the intriguing destructive ethics of Judge Murray Snow. And also, maybe, Arizona’s backwater corruption so well represented by Trump-hating Senators John McCain and Jeff Flake.

Vatican City, Feb 17, 2018 / 05:10 am (CNA/EWTN News).- On Saturday the Vatican announced that Pope Francis has reconfirmed Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston as head of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, also reconfirming seven members…Continue Reading

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In response to the Trump administration’s 2019 federal budget proposal on Monday, the U.S. Catholic bishops are urging for a budget that shows greater concern for “‘the least of these” and warning that the U.S. “must never seek…Continue Reading

A Connecticut high school student may have to decide whether to remove a Planned Parenthood sticker on her laptop or leave her Catholic school after administrators told her to remove it, her parents said. Sophomore Kate Murray’s parents told the Greenwich Time that…Continue Reading

February 8, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – The Bible’s condemnation of homosexual acts should be taken in “context” with Biblical times, Jesuit Father James Martin toldGeorgetown University students recently. Martin said as well that Catholics who support gay “marriage” should have no problem…Continue Reading

JACKSON, Mississippi, February 2, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – A bill banning abortion on babies more than 15 weeks old passed the Mississippi state House today 79-31. House Bill 1510 would make Mississippi the state with the most pro-life laws if it…Continue Reading

Just three Democrats in the U.S. Senate supported a bill on Monday that would prohibit abortions after 20 weeks when unborn babies are capable of feeling pain. The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which has strong public support from Republicans…Continue Reading

ROME, January 30, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – In an exclusive interview two weeks after issuing a profession of immutable truths about sacramental marriage, Bishop Athanasius Schneider is inviting his brother bishops around the world to join in raising a common voice…Continue Reading

As Katholisch.de, the official website of the German bishops, reports today, Cardinal Willem Eijk, the Dutch cardinal and Metropolitan Archbishop of Utrecht, requested that Pope Francis bring light into the confusion concerning the question as to how to deal with…Continue Reading

When Selena Miller, a practicing Catholic, applied to DePaul, she had no idea it was a Catholic university. Damita Meneves, another practicing Catholic, said she has met only one other Catholic student in her first year at DePaul. DePaul is…Continue Reading

His Eminence, Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke, spoke recently with Thinking with the Church, hosted by Chris Altieri, who is also a regular contributor to Catholic World Report. Cardinal Burke responds to questions regarding the interpretation and reception of the post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation, Amoris…Continue Reading

Untitled 5Untitled 2

Attention Readers: Welcome to
our website. Readers who are familiar with The Wanderer know we have been
providing Catholic news and orthodox commentary for 150 years in our weekly
print edition.
Our daily version offers only some of what we publish weekly in print. To take
advantage of everything The Wanderer publishes, we encourage you to
subscribe
to our flagship weekly print edition,
which is mailed every Friday or, if you want to view it in its entirety online,
you can subscribe to the E-edition,
which is a replica of the print edition. Our daily edition includes: a selection of
material from recent issues of our print edition, news stories updated daily
from renowned news sources, access to archives from The Wanderer from the past
10 years, available at a minimum charge (this will be expanded as time goes
on). Also: regularly updated features where we go back in time and highlight
various columns and news items covered in The Wanderer over the past 150 years.
And: a comments section in which your remarks are encouraged, both good and bad,
including suggestions. We encourage you to become a daily visitor to
our site. If you appreciate our site, tell your friends. As Catholics we must
band together to rediscover our faith and share it with the world if we are to
effectively counter a society whose moral culture seems to have no boundaries
and a government whose rapidly extending reach threatens to extinguish the
rights of people of faith to practice their religion (witness the HHS mandate).
Now more than ever, vehicles like The Wanderer are needed for clarification and
guidance on the issues of the day. Catholic, conservative, orthodox, and loyal to the
Magisterium have been this journal’s hallmarks for five generations. God
willing, our message will continue well into this century and beyond.

By DON FIER (Editor’s Note: His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke, Patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta and Founder of the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in La Crosse, Wis., graciously took time out of his busy schedule to grant The Wanderer a wide-ranging interview during a recent visit to the Shrine. Included among the topics…Continue Reading

By RAYMOND LEO CARDINAL BURKE (Editor’s Note: His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke delivered the address below at the 32nd Annual Church Teaches Forum, “The Message of Fatima: Peace for the World,” Galt House, Louisville, Ky., July 22, 2017. The address is reprinted here with the kind permission of Cardinal Burke. All rights reserved. This is part one of the…Continue Reading

Catechism

Today . . .

There’s nothing, it seems, that the abortion chain Planned Parenthood won’t sue over. On Thursday, affiliates of the abortion chain in seven states sued the Trump administration for cutting funding for their questionable teen pregnancy prevention programs. The Daily Nonpareil reports the lawsuits argue that the Trump administration wrongly cut their funding prematurely and without cause. Nine groups, including Planned Parenthood affiliates in Washington, Iowa, North Carolina, South C

CAMBRIDGE, England, February 15, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – A respected Catholic historian and philosopher challenged Cardinal Blase Cupich during a lecture last week about Pope’ Francis so-called “revolution of mercy” that has caused what many are defending as a “paradigm shift” in Catholic practice. Professor John Rist, after listening to a February 9 lecture at Cambridge Universityin which Cardinal Cupich praised Pope Francis’ “paradigm shift” in Catholic practice, asked the Cardinal at the end of the lect

VIENNA, Austria, February 14, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Austria’s bishops, led by Vienna’s Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, are indignant over a retired bishop’s passionate defense of Catholic teaching in opposing Church “blessings” for homosexual unions. After Bishop Andreas Laun, the retired Auxiliary Bishop of Salzburg, Austria, published Monday his strong rebuke of the German bishops for proposing to bless homosexual couples, there has been an inten

Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago is all for clarity. It has been a consistent theme, as when in September of 2017 he issued a decree banning guns in all parishes, schools and other facilities across the archdiocese “so there would be absolute clarity on our position.” His official statement put “clarity” in italics. When he was bishop of Rapid City, he called for “civility and clarity” in discussing legislation that would limit abortion, but he…Continue Reading

BEIJING — A group of influential Catholics published an open letter Monday express their shock and disappointment at report that the Vatican could soon reach a deal with the Chinese government, warning that it could create a schism in the church in China. The Holy See has been in negotiations for several years with the Chinese Communist Party and is now belie

Advertisement(2)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Within a week of taking office on January 23, 2017, President Trump reinstated and expanded the Mexico City Policy, now called the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance, which bans U.S. funding for abortions overseas. The expanded policy prohibits $9 billion in U.S. taxpayer money from funding foreign organizations that perform or…Continue Reading

By HANNAH BROCKHAUS VATICAN CITY (CNA/EWTN News) — The Congregation for the Causes of Saints has approved the second miracle needed for the canonization of Blessed Pope Paul VI, allowing his canonization to take place, possibly later this year. According to Vatican Insider, the Congregation for the Causes of Saints approved the miracle by a…Continue Reading

By STEPHEN M. KRASON (Editor’s Note: Stephen M. Krason’s Neither Left nor Right, but Catholic column appears monthly [sometimes bimonthly] in Crisis. He is professor of political science and legal studies and associate director of the Veritas Center for Ethics in Public Life at Franciscan University of Steubenville. He is also cofounder and president of…Continue Reading

By LISA BOURNE (Editor’s Note: LifeSiteNews ran this story on February 5.) + + + A Catholic priest is calling on bishops to excommunicate the 14 Catholic-identifying U.S. senators who voted two weeks ago against banning late-term abortions. He is also calling on priests to deny the Catholic pro-abortion senators Holy Communion. “Today is the…Continue Reading

By JAMES LIKOUDIS The centuries-old theological debate concerning the existence of Limbo for unbaptized babies (the limbo puerorum as a state of natural happiness) led to the 2007 publication of the document The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptized by the International Theological Commission (ITC). The commission concluded there are “serious…Continue Reading

Advertisement

Our Catholic Faith (Section B of print edition)

By DON FIER For a variety of reasons (a defect of consent, a diriment impediment, or a defect of the required form), many supposed modern-day marriages entered into by Catholic persons are invalid from their origin in the eyes of God and the Church. However, as we saw last week, depending on the circumstances, the Church has procedures by which…Continue Reading

Q. Concerning what our Blessed Mother said in Fatima about the rosary, I am confused as to whether or not she meant us to meditate on the mysteries while we are praying the Hail Marys or whether she meant us to meditate on the mysteries right before we say the Hail Marys. The consensus seems to be that we are…Continue Reading

By FR. ROBERT ALTIER Second Sunday Of Lent Readings: Gen. 22:1-2, 9a, 10-13, 15-18 Romans 8:31b-34 Mark 9:2-10 In the first reading today we hear about Abraham’s nearly incomprehensible act of faith and love for God shown in his willingness to sacrifice his own son. We have to be careful not to read this in a vacuum. This test, which…Continue Reading

By ANDREA GAGLIARDUCCI (Wanderer Editor’s Note: Catholic News Agency on February 3 published a commentary concerning a 1989 Vatican response to dissent against Humanae Vitae. Below is an excerpted version of that commentary. Following that, we reprint the full text of the 1989 Vatican response, which, as the CNA commentary explains, is now available on the Vatican’s website. Please also…Continue Reading

By FR. KEVIN M. CUSICK A joke sometimes recounted among clergy goes along these lines: Someone greets a wise old priest by asking, “What’s new?”, and he responds, sagely, “Christ is risen!” The humor here is less about what’s new than about the fact that everything, other than the only true revolution of Christ’s Incarnation and triumph over death, is…Continue Reading

By CAROLE BRESLIN Great sinners make great saints. It takes a strong-willed child to become a saint. These are statements which would easily fit saints such as Mary Magdalene and St. Augustine. In the thirteenth century, a young lady free in spirit and strong in will led such a life that she was essentially driven from her home village, but…Continue Reading

By CAROLE BRESLIN In the lives of the saints one thing is very common: They have such a strong desire to do God’s will that nothing will hinder their work. Many saints, despite illness, weak health, or many other obstacles achieved their goals. Frequently the amount of work accomplished by such individuals seems humanly impossible — and, of course, it…Continue Reading