RE: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs

From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>

To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:57:55 -0700

Without taking sides, this comment isn't relevant to Hoare's original
complaint, which applied to C just as well as Ada. He wanted to prove
program reliability.
(However, as an aside on this topic, as an undergrad I had a classmate whose
summer job was writing test cases for the Ada validation suite. She assured
me [incorrectly] that it would be at least 10 years before anyone had an
approved Ada compiler. Of course, I later did grad work at NYU, where I got
to hobnob with the people who wrote that first compiler! ;-)
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:07 AM
> To: Steven R. Newcomb; simonstl@simonstl.com
> Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs
>
>
> Yet by the mid 90s, optimizers for ADA had been shown
> to create code that ran as fast and as reliably as C.
> Just as with SGML and now XML++, sharp people carved
> off the pieces they needed for their projects and
> made them work locally. What is different in our situation
> is the size of the locale in which these things must
> work.
>
> Complexity is manageable given willing resources. My
> sense of the web is that anything very complex will
> soon encounter and very unwilling set of resources,
> so the first thing to accept is that nothing universal
> is achievable for very long.
>
> Len
> http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
>
> Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
> Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven R. Newcomb [mailto:srn@coolheads.com]
>
>
> About ten years later, another Turing Award Lecturer (don't have time
> to track down the reference) complained about the complexity of Ada.
> According to what I recall from reading about it in _Computerworld_ 20
> years ago, the complaint was different from Dijkstra's complaint about
> PL/I (below). The complaint was not so much that programmers couldn't
> handle Ada's complexity, but that reliably implementing Ada itself was
> simply out of reach. The speaker worried that missile guidance
> systems and other weapon systems running real-time Ada programs would
> misbehave in various unforeseeable ways. He was horrified that the
> U.S. military was trying to standardize on Ada.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>