And any object at any point in world space, influenced by prevailing in a given point in space, the gravitational field. So movement of all objects in outer space should be considered in the frame where the four known parameters of the measurement is added and the gravitational vector, showing the strength and direction of gravity of the object to the prevailing in the space of the source of gravity. Thus, if we want to know how to build solar system, we need a four-dimensional reference system 'bind' to the vector, shows the strength and direction of pull of the Sun to the center of our galaxy. And in a five-dimensional coordinate system, we can not, along with the righteousness of Copernicus, to recognize the right and Ptolemy, as follows from the special theory of relativity. It is also clear that in such a frame of reference in Einstein was not born to such a mistaken notion as "totally quiescent object '. Newton believed that objects in space move with respect to still the ether. But held at the end of the 19th century by Maxwell experiment to detect an ether wind, which in his opinion, should be manifested at the Earth moves around the sun, gave no positive result. And in early 20th century, Einstein proposed the idea, where the empty space, combined with an empty time, gave rise to an abstract four-dimensional system of space-time frame within which quite simply was solved in the mathematical form the quantitative side of certain processes, but which in principle could not reflect the physics of the processes. Once long ago in Literaturnaya was published the following joke mathematicians.

I would not want to condemn the concept of spondylitis, which we got as a result of centuries of labor of the family, only I would like to add that the human brain is the same body, consisting of the anatomical structure of the body. All brains are a kind of "stomach", where there are reception, processing and sale of information, "mouth – pass – litter." In the modern world, life is arranged so that it is rich and poor. At this stage, the natural evolution would have it: an incentive – profit, promotion – money. Some control over income, others seek to profit through control. This range is: kernel – the striving for profit, the middle segment – control the gain, the patron (the last segment) – the profit itself. It is inviolable, not to say that this spectrum should be brought into harmony with the ideological spectrum, which, as mentioned above, is still in its formative stages.

But more on that later. On Ideology ideology would like to say a lot, but can get many volumes, and rarely agree to read them. In this publication, my goal is to acquaint the broad masses of readers with a theoretical summing up the whole of reality to the spectral basis of the subject, that is, "a ride on the spectrum, both in … rails. " I hope I do something successful. 9 Thus, the purpose of life – mind, spirit and dream (range). A sample of contemporary life in this evolutionary stage – the consumer, labor, culture (spectra).

The development of social consciousness is not only an increase in embodied knowledge, but above all a constant from generation to generation increase of subjective knowledge society of individuals forming. The process of objectification of subjective knowledge precedes the process of subjectification of objective knowledge – the acquisition of an individual part of the accumulated knowledge society, based on which the individual self in the process of research can acquire new knowledge. The possibility of acquiring new knowledge by the individual on any issue is determined not only his intelligence, but also the possession of accumulated human knowledge on a particular issue. Therefore, apart from the processes of learning individual consciousness and objectification of knowledge – Processes that determine the progress of the "society – nature" – is incredibly important to the progress of this system, especially for the speed of its course, is the spread of the extracted knowledge by individuals. Since this process is, moreover, that itself is a process of direct development of social consciousness, it also creates a basis for further discoveries by other individuals. And the wider the spread of knowledge, ie than more individuals involved in the process of development of social consciousness, the greater the rate of progress of the "society – nature." The activities of individuals in which the discovery of new knowledge, their objectification and distribution, in which the development of the system "society – nature," always aims to meet their own needs, even if it is concern for the needs of other people. Therefore, the source of development of social consciousness, the source of progress of the "society – nature," is to develop a dialectical system, which is the basis of ontogeny of an individual.