If our major media outlets tried to pretend the Occupy
movement wasn't happening while their lavishing attention on the Tea Party,
then..."

Would
you vote for Bush if your only choices were Romney and Bush? Yes? Or would the
"right" and "left" fists of the 1% finally be made clear to you for what they
really are? No? Would a "choice" between Bush and Romney still not be the final straw to make
you reject the right-and-left paradigm, and vote for someone like Jill Stein
instead?

If
your immediate answer is "no, I would never
vote for Bush under any circumstances," then why would you vote for someone
with a worse environmental record, and a worse human rights record than George
Bush?

The
1% has pulled the greatest sleight-of-hand trick on us by getting us to accept
the unacceptable through Obama, which we never would've tolerated under Bush.
And as much as our major media outlets try to put down Obama in favor of
Romney, they will never once inform us that Obama's records on human rights and
the environment, are already much worse than George Bush's:

"...what if the movement behind Jill Stein is
much much bigger than our major media outlets want us to know?

- Advertisement -

If the unprecedented high voter turn-out
against Bush's policies in 2008 happens again in 2012, then Jill Stein will win
by a landslide --easy! What bitter irony that the only thing preventing us from defeating
the 1% (for REAL this time!) are the Obama apologists who insist that we can't.
If braver people like Martin Luther King Jr had adhered to those common held
beliefs about what is "unrealistic" and "impossible," they never would've
tried.

**my protect.org links, for part I, have been removed (or changed?), This link is all I could find, for now: notonemorechild (dot org/facts/14)**
Proud contributer to the I hate fascism site (a time capsule from 2003-2005). Also wrote (more...)