Determining Premarital Property Can Keep Divorce Less Messy

Posted on Mar 13, 2014 12:00am PDT

The divorce process anywhere in the United States, including Georgia, can
proceed swiftly if no children are involved and if few properties and
assets need to be divided. High-asset divorces, on the other hand, can
be very complex due to the extent and size of properties and assets. This
is the case of billionaire Harold Hamm and soon-to-be ex-wife Sue Ann Hamm.

Many oil-industry observers have wondered about the fate of Continental
Resources, the oil company founded in the 1960s by Harold Hamm. His divorce
from Sue Ann, initiated by her in May 2012, has put the couple's properties
up for division. Recently, however, an Oklahoma District Court judge ruled
that the 122 million shares of Continental owned by Hamm before his marriage
will be considered premarital and thus not subject to property division.

Hamm says he was relieved with the ruling because Continental shareholders
have been concerned by the possibility of a sudden change in the company's
operating regime in the event the divorce were to split its founder's holdings.

The trial phase of the Hamm divorce will begin in July, and Hamm has expressed
his hope that the case will be settled before the end of the year.

Both Oklahoma and Georgia are equitable distribution states, which means
that property and assets are divided in a way that is presumed to be fair
and just to both parties but that is not necessarily equal. Before property
division proceeds, all properties and assets will be identified as marital
or premarital. Only marital assets will be subject to division; premarital
assets will be excluded from the process.

When faced with a high-asset divorce, spouses should consult with a family
law attorney who can ensure that the potential client will obtain his
or her fair share of the marriage's ultimate financial value.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only.
Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual
case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt
or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.