PAUL RYAN: The Sequester Is Going To Happen Because Democrats Have 'No Leadership'http://www.businessinsider.com/paul-ryan-democrats-sequester-2013-2/comments
en-usWed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 -0500Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:05:30 -0400Grace Wylerhttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/5123f0bbecad04b34e000018jtTue, 19 Feb 2013 16:38:03 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5123f0bbecad04b34e000018
Did not Boneher say to the press after the deal..They got 98% of what they wanted and he was a Happy camper'...
We do have video now, eddie..Fail again!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5123ef5beab8ea7978000015jtTue, 19 Feb 2013 16:32:11 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5123ef5beab8ea7978000015
Seems Eddie has forgotten that this is the 21st Century, we have video now! It was immediately after the deal that Boneher said 'He and the repubs got 98% of what they wanted and he was a pretty happy camper'.!!!..
Sorry--- eddie lyni ryan..you fail again!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122f4daeab8eaba51000011cherrymacMon, 18 Feb 2013 22:43:22 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122f4daeab8eaba51000011
Fuck this ass clown. He was in that Cuban restaurant last year in Florida telling them anti Cubans that he and Mittens would go hard on Castro and Chavez.LOL!
How antiquated.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122be346bb3f72a7b000008MCallawayMon, 18 Feb 2013 18:50:12 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122be346bb3f72a7b000008
The Sequester isn't big enough and needs to be $1 Trillion a year in reduction NOW!!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/512271d2eab8ea8a34000001Janet FenderMon, 18 Feb 2013 13:24:18 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/512271d2eab8ea8a34000001
The sequester is going to happen because we have no leadership period. All parties - democrats, republicans...teaparties... have no leadership and only engage in fingerpointing.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122547eeab8ea0b6e000008FactualThinkingMon, 18 Feb 2013 11:19:10 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122547eeab8ea0b6e000008
Since when does the House have to wait for the Senate to pass a bill? Pot calling the Kettle black.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/512224cb6bb3f7a45800001ctjnMon, 18 Feb 2013 07:55:39 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/512224cb6bb3f7a45800001c
It going to happen because the Guy at the top who give the Dems their marching order thinks running trillion dollar deficits is just fine and we don't have a spending problem. Just that we are not taxing the rich and upper middle class enough.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/51222379eab8ea2a02000001LibertarianMon, 18 Feb 2013 07:50:01 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/51222379eab8ea2a02000001
Both parties are trying to blame each other for the fiasco that is our Federal government. Yes spending cuts would be good, but will also hurt the economy, as so much of it now depends on government spending. You will not get to keep the extra money if they cut government spending, as it will go to service and pay down the debt. It has already been spent and it's stimulus ability used. This has been more than 30 years in the making, and they have no idea how to fix things without causing economic collapse. Therefore the strategy of both parties is to try to put the blame on the other guy.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122194eecad044351000022munchonitMon, 18 Feb 2013 07:06:38 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122194eecad044351000022
you've really got too much time on your handshttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122182d6bb3f77247000001JTMon, 18 Feb 2013 07:01:49 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122182d6bb3f77247000001
Its about damn time we started cutting the federal govt down to size.
The sequester is a good start, but we need much, much deeper cuts.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122116d69bedd632300000cno budget no problemMon, 18 Feb 2013 06:33:01 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5122116d69bedd632300000c
as stated before , we have a liberalism problem, not a spending problem.
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/ewf98ehfew9f" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://tinyurl.com/ewf98ehfew9f</a>http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5121c97369beddb37400000dTRMon, 18 Feb 2013 01:25:55 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5121c97369beddb37400000d
Have the Rep/Teas considered if Sequester or spending cuts might affect their voting base? No,they aren't that smart.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5121abbbeab8ea5104000004John RSun, 17 Feb 2013 23:19:07 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5121abbbeab8ea5104000004
Wait! How many fuqers do the Republicans and Tea-baggers have called:
* Paul
* Rand
* Ryan
WTF? Did their mothers run out of names?http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5121a4e969beddd222000005H BogartSun, 17 Feb 2013 22:50:01 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/5121a4e969beddd222000005
Sequester = cutting govt spending, right? Why is this not a terrific idea? The federal budget has more than doubled since Clinton - and we were wasting money hand over fist back then. Spending is completely out of control now.http://www.businessinsider.com/c/51217c2aecad04f83100000dWorking 122Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:56:10 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/51217c2aecad04f83100000d
Good news. Time to bring everyone home. Congress had the chance to fix this a year ago and didn't so f.....um. Maybe they will learn to act more quickly next time!http://www.businessinsider.com/c/51216410eab8ea0b6700000fNoSingleOneSun, 17 Feb 2013 18:13:20 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/51216410eab8ea0b6700000f
In lieu of stating the obvious about who really is responsible for the sequester, I found some interesting anagrams for "Paul Ryan acts like Ayn Rand":
-A Satanically Randy Punker
-Yap Drunkenly, Scar a Latina
-A Drunker Analytical Pansy
-A Panacea Inns Truly Darkly
-A Runty Yank Drills A Canapehttp://www.businessinsider.com/c/51214eb1ecad04f35d00000bOMGSun, 17 Feb 2013 16:42:09 -0500http://www.businessinsider.com/c/51214eb1ecad04f35d00000b
The current hyper partisan politics we are living under is so tiring.
I long for the old days when politicians would meet in a smoke filled room and hammer out a deal that screwed everybody equally.