Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.

The Dutch Don’t Care About Marriage

Is the Dutch approach better than ours? Do you think it benefits women more? Why are we (Americans) so wedding obsessed? It sometimes seems as if we are more concerned with the cememony than the actual marriage.

The Dutch Don’t Care About Marriage

Americans can learn a lot from their indifference.

I was in Amsterdam for probably three hours when I began to see that
having children and not being married was not a big deal there. In fact,
marriage itself is not a big deal there. I was there to talk about my
book In Praise of Messy Lives, which was coming out in Dutch, but what passes in America for a messy life is in Amsterdam just, well, how things go.

The Dutch attitude, which I like, is that marriage is not for
everyone; it is a personal choice, an option, a pleasant possibility,
but not marrying is not a failure, a great blot on your
achievements in life, a critical rite of passage you have missed.
Sometimes people get around to getting married, and sometimes they
don’t. Several Dutch women in their 40s, with children and rich romantic
histories, tell me about marriage, “It just wasn’t something that
mattered to me.”

As a popular view, this laissez faire approach accommodates the
vicissitudes of the heart, the changing nature of love, the great
variety of forms attachments take in real life. It acknowledges that
things change, and to exit a relationship with kids is less violent
somehow, less publically absolute, than to exit a marriage. A bit of
tolerance, of bemusement, of compassion or imagination is built into the
system.

I try to describe to a couple of audiences in Amsterdam the
against-the-grainness of someone, especially a woman, who has not
married in America. I try to explain how having children outside of
marriage is still considered an alternative, and essentially inferior
life choice. I mention that an American writer wrote a cover story in the Atlantic
on the remarkable and exotic fact that she was in her late 30s and had
never married. This sort of blew their minds. Who could possibly care?
It seemed like a crazy American thing for marriage to matter so much. To
them this obsession, this nagging necessity for weddings, the lack of
general acceptance toward other pretty common ways of living, is so
foreign, so uniquely American, such a quaint narrowness, that it’s
incomprehensible as an actual mode of modern life.

At first I started fantasizing about whether I could move to a steep
little Dutch house, and if I could balance a child on a bicycle. But it
also seems to me it would be a great thing if we could absorb some of
the Dutch attitude toward conjugal life. I am not here arguing against
marriage, but against marriage as a rite of passage, against the
assumption of all little girls that they will one day be married in a
white dress on a green lawn, against the socially engraved absolute of
it, the impossible-to-evade shining ideal.

What would it mean to end the centuries-long American fixation on
traditional family structures? Would we be able to look at families
living outside of convention without as much judgment, as much toxic
condescension? Would the “smug marrieds” Helen Fielding wrote about in Bridget Jones’ Diary be less smug and just married?

If we woke up one morning and discovered that in America marriage was
suddenly regarded as a choice, a way, a possibility, but not a definite
and essential phase of life, think how many people would suddenly be
living above board, think of the stress removed, the pressures lifted,
the stigmas dissolving. Think how many people living unhappily would see
their way to living less unhappily. In Edwardian England, the cultural
critic Rebecca West wrote about the “dinginess that come between us and
the reality of love” and the “gross, destructive mutual raids on
personality that often form marriages.”

Whatever one thinks about the institution, the truth is that marriage
is increasingly not the way Americans are living. If one goes strictly
by the facts—that the majority of babies born to women under 30 are born
to single mothers, or that about 51 percent of American adults are
married—one has to admit that marriage can’t be taken for granted,
assumed as a rite of passage, a towering symbol of our way of life. But
somehow this hasn’t dimmed our solid sense of marriage as the American
normal.

If we suddenly stopped being in thrall to the rigid, old-fashioned ideal of marriage, we could stop worrying about low marriage rates and high divorce rates. We could stop worrying about single mothers and the decline of marriage as an institution, especially in the lower middle class, and the wasteful industry of wedding planning.
We could instead focus on actual relationships, on intimacies, on
substance over form; we could focus on love in its myriad, unpredictable
varieties. We could see life here in the amber waves of grain not for
what it should be, but for what it is.

Send me email updates about messages I've received on the site and the latest news from The CafeMom Team.
By signing up, you certify that you are female and accept the Terms of Service and have read the
Privacy Policy.