Top Menu

Home

For nearly a decade since 9/11, America’s national security establishment’s understanding of the threat of Islamic terrorism and its approach to contending with that danger flow directly from a conviction that they have nothing to do with Islam, except to the extent al Qaeda “perverts” or “hijacks” that religion.

But what if this characterization of the problem we continue to face is simply and utterly wrong? What if there actually is a direct tie between what recognized, mainstream authorities of Islam call “sharia” and the jihad (or holy war) it demands of adherents, some of which is manifested as terrifying violence? What if, in addition, jihadists engage in non-violent – and, in some ways, far more insidious – efforts to accomplish the same goal: the supremacy of sharia worldwide under a caliph?

Ban Sharia Law in USA

Sign the petition to protect our US Constitution by banning Sharia Law in the United States.

Petition to Ban Sharia Law in the US

We The People of the United States of America do hereby and herein declare that any coexistence between political Islam and America and/or Sharia Law is not possible due to our inherent differences in ideology and beliefs in individual rights and freedoms. We further affirm that the United States Constitution shall remain the Supreme Law of the Land. No foreign laws to be considered in our courtrooms and all officials must adhere to their oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America under penalty of imprisonment and removal of office.

Any attempts to insinuate Islamic or Sharia Law into the United States Legal system must be met with the resistance of the American People through education into the insidious nature of Islam and the fact that Islam serves as a political engine of conquest as well as a pseudo-religion.. Because of the function of Islam as an engine of world conquest, We The People of the United States of America feel that incorporating Sharia and American Law will have irreversible detrimental effects to the Freedoms we are guaranteed under our United States Constitution.

A few brief examples will be cited to show why Sharia Law and our United States Constitution are incompatible (and henceforth any person in political power with an oath to support the Constitution of the United States who attempts to insinuate Sharia Law in the United States will be prosecuted as a traitor to the United States in times of war (as we are still at war with terrorism).

Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.

Qur'an (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves.

Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.

Qur'an (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith" among those who are not believers.

Qur'an (2:225) - "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts" The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

Qur'an (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means 'deceit'. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)

Bukhari (52:269) - "The Prophet said, 'War is deceit.'" The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad's men after he "guaranteed" them safe passage (see Additional Notes below).

Bukhari (49:857) - "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.

Bukhari (84:64-65) - Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."

Muslim (32:6303) - "...he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)."

Bukhari (50:369) - Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka'b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad's insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka'b's trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.

Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 - 8.2) - "Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory... it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression...

Since there are many places in Islamic text and law where Muslims are given permission or actually encouraged to lie to non-Muslims it is evident that from a legal precedent our laws will not be starting from common ground or contain a common goal (the establishment or discernment of the truth).

When new immigrants become American Citizens they revoke all allegiances with their former countries and swear allegiance to the United States and our Laws. Since Muslims are allowed and encouraged to lie to non-Muslims, how can we take any of their oaths seriously? Natural born Americans are not forced to swear allegiance, but the same is imputed to them as a condition of being or remaining an American Citizen.

With a large majority of all terrorist acts being committed by “Radical” Islam the Quran still calls for all Muslims to wage Jihad against the infidel (kafir or non-believer) until Islam reigns supreme in the world. Since the Quran commands all devout Muslims to wage Jihad, we cannot be certain as to who is peaceful and who could become radical.
In countries where Sharia Law is enforced or maintained, the rights of women are severely impaired (as the Quran states that the woman does not have the intelligence of a man and that it will require two or three women to equal the testimony of one man).

There have been several recent incidents where Muslim women have been raped by men (and the man has been set free solely on his word even though the science of DNA or polygraph testing could prove the woman’s innocence) while the women have been punished severely for having sex outside of marriage where the punishment has resulted in the death of many women who may have been innocent if they were allowed to utilize a legal system that supported the search for the truth instead of searching for the support of the freedom of the man.

In light of all of these discrepancies between the legal system representing the United States and the legal system called Sharia Law it is imperative that we work diligently to ensure that the Freedoms guaranteed under the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights never be circumvented by any other legal system or treaty.