On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 14:13:18 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Philipp Kern (pkern@debian.org):
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 07:56:23AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > The "sublevel 6" is now in place for strings we want to change after a
> > > unilaterally called freeze..:-)
> >
> > Isn't that a hack, given that the volatile string will be shown in basic
> > installations? (I didn't check. It's possible that one needs to tamper with
> > priorities. *shrug*)
>
>
> This is a hack meant to avoid disabling translations just because
> they're missing *these* strings. In short, a hack meant for languages
> missing only those to be still calculated as being 100%.
>
You're disabling translations as soon as they're not 100%?
Cheers,
Julien