The autonomy of chemistry: old and new problems

Abstract

The autonomy of chemistry and the legitimacy of the philosophy of chemistry are usually discussed in the context of the issue of reduction of chemistry to physics, and defended making use of the failure of reductionistic claims. Until quite recent times a rather widespread viewpoint was, however, that the failure of reductionistic claims concerns actually epistemological aspect of reduction only, but the ontological reduction of chemistry to physics cannot be denied. The new problems of the autonomy of chemistry in the context of reductionism seem to be ontological and metaphysical. In the present paper it is argued that there is no need for some kind of metaphysical-ontological underpinning for rejection of the secondary positions of chemistry and philosophy of chemistry with respect to physics and philosophy of physics. The issue can be elucidated in terms of the philosophy of science accepting practical realism (also known by other names).

Vihalemm, R Can chemistry be handled as its own type of science?. In: Psarros, N, Gavroglu, K eds. (1999) Ars Mutandi—Issues in Philosophy and History of Chemistry. Leipziger Universitätsverlag, Leipzig, pp. 83-88

Vihalemm, R Chemistry as an interesting subject for the philosophy of science. In: Vihalemm, R eds. (2001) Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 219). Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 185-200
CrossRef