Differences angiographic and IVUS parameters after DES between different FFR groups [ Time Frame: baseline ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Angiographic residual percent diameter stenosis (%), minimal stent lumen diameter (mm) and total stent length (mm), and IVUS minimal stent cross-sectional area (mm2) and minimal stent lumen diameter (mm) will be compared according to different FFR groups at the time of measurement after DES implantation.

Invasive imaging criteria of the Coronary arteriography (CAG) and intravascular ultrasound imaging (IVUS), satisfying procedural optimization after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation, were used in < 10% DS by CAG and 5-5.5mm2 MSA by IVUS. Whether these criteria satisfy not only relieving visible stenosis but also relieving lesion specific ischemia or not were unclear. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), an index of lesion specific ischemia, was proposed 0.9 as a physiologic criteria satisfying successful stent implantation by previous studies with bare metal stent. FFR after drug-eluting stent implantation can be an useful predictor for clinical outcome. But, direct comparative evaluation of the invasive imaging criteria defining as an indicator relieving myocardial ischemia were not reported. The aim of this study was to investigate angiographic and IVUS parameters in which corresponding FFR and evaluate their optimal physiologic criteria after DES implantation.

Detailed Description

Not Provided

Study Type ICMJE

Observational

Study Design ICMJE

Observational Model: Case-OnlyTime Perspective: Cross-Sectional

Target Follow-Up Duration

Not Provided

Biospecimen

Not Provided

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention for the diagnosis and treatment purposes because of clinical angina pectoris. Patient who underwent simultaneous IVUS and FFR measurement after DES implantation would be enrolled consecutively.