Falkland Islands War Paper

No one really knows who discovered the Falkland Islands. Nearly every British historian will insist that the English explorer John Davis discovered the islands in 1592(1) while Argentineans typically credit Vespucci, Magellan, or Sebald de Weert. (2) The events of January 2, 1883 are not in dispute, however. On this date, James Onslow, captain of the HMS Clio, dropped anchor just off the Falklands. The next day he went ashore and raised the British flag. (3) This action infuriated the Argentines, who had taken control of the Falklands upon receiving independence from Spain in 1816. With his imperialistic seizure of the islands, Onslow began a sequence of events that would end nearly 150 years later in war. Shortly after the invasion, the Argentine government set out four arguments in favour of their ownership of the Falklands: 1.Argentina ruled all land in the region formerly held by Spain. 2.Spain had purchased the islands from France.

3.Britain had abandoned its claim to the Falklands in a "secret" 1771 agreement. 4.Britain had abandoned its settlement in West Falkland in 1774.(4) No matter how well formed these arguments may have been, they fell on deaf ears in Britain. Lord Palmerston, the British Foreign Secretary, simply asserted that the Falklands had been British since the initial claim of sovereignty in 1765. (5) Although Argentina remained in a state of official protest, few things changed over the next 132 years. The issue was finally brought to the forefront in 1965 when the United Nations passed Resolution 2065, which called upon Britain and Argentina to come to an agreement on the issue with reasonable speed. (6) With this resolution began what came to be called the "Seventeen Year War" between the two nations. In March 1967 Britain agreed that it might be possible to cede sovereignty of the Falklands to Argentina, as long as the islanders agreed. (7) While the Argentines may have viewed this as a major concession, Britain had really given up very little. The Falkland islanders were quite resolute in their desire to remain subjects of the Queen. They managed to force the creation of a Falklands Islands lobby whose purpose it was to frustrate any plans to hand over the territory to Argentina. (8) The lobby combined with the islanders' continuous protests to parliament was enough to stall the negotiations indefinitely. The events of the following decade are notable only because almost no headway was made on the issue. While joint memos of understanding were forthcoming from the two countries, they did little more than voice each side's desire to bring the issue to a resolution. Events took on a more urgent tone as the years wore on, however. This was mainly due to the Argentineans, as Great Britain almost certainly desired a continuation of the status quo. Argentina was being relegated to a position of third-rate influence in the world. The country was still recovering from "la guerra sucia" (the dirty war) waged by military dictator Jorge Videla from 1976 to 1978. During these two years, nearly 18,000 Argentineans vanished, including dozens of journalists, scientists, and religious figures. (9) Things had changed dramatically, however, by the end of 1980. Leopoldo Galtieri had ascended to the presidency of Argentina. As commander-in-chief of the army and head of the three-man military junta which ran the country, Galtieri largely ended the dirty war and worked very hard to build a closer relationship with the United States. As the government was positioning Argentina as a new regional power, Galtieri began to concern himself with the state of the Falklands negotiations. He convinced himself that regaining the Falklands was essential to maintaining national pride. By December 1981, Galtieri, after speaking with Admiral Jorge Anaya, head of the Argentine navy, resolved that the Falklands would be in Argentine hands within a year. (10)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...defeat in the FalklandsWar of 1982?
The FalklandsWar lasted 74 days and ended with Argentine surrender on 14 June, which returned the islands to British control. The Argentinean troops were superior in number, but despite this, the British forces were able to take over the FalklandIslands. Poor leadership and inferior technology have been suggested to be two of the reasons behind the Argentinean defeat, and in this essay I aim to discuss these aspects, and determine if they can explain the Argentinean defeat in the FalklandsWar of 1982.
Firstly, I aim to discuss aspects in favor of the argument, beginning with the British superiority, respective Argentinean inferiority, regarding weapons and material. After the British ships had been sent to the FalklandIslands, they circulated around the Islands and were ordered to attack any Argentinean ship entering a specific area several miles outside the Islands. Argentinean ships approached both north and south, but a British submarine followed and was therefore able to track the Argentinean ship coming from south. The Argentinean ships were superior in number, although, the British ships were superior in technology, and combined with a little luck, it was possible for them to sink several ships, including Argentina’s most powerful warship...

...﻿Margret Thatcher and the FalklandIslands
Thatcher’s handling of the Falklands crisis can be considered to be successful as she triumphed over the Argentines, winning back the islands, and also she finished in a much stronger position politically, and internationally. Thatcher managed to secure international backing, as she secured the backing of NATO, and more importantly the USA. This was to play a huge part in the Falklands crisis as she obtained the loaning of the Ascension Islands which proved instrumental in ensuring victory for Britain by putting pressure on Argentina militarily. She took tough decisions that may have ultimately won the war. For example, she decided to controversially sink the Belgrano. This essentially made the Argentine navy weak, and also made them wary of the ability of the British navy. She also listened well to her military advisers, this is proven by the fact it only took 3 weeks to recapture the islands. Considering the islands were 8000 miles away and it would take 2 weeks to get there, this is an extraordinary feat. Despite being able to make the right decisions, Thatcher also made some fairly detrimental mistakes. One of which was her decision to cut navy spending, which included the withdrawal of the HMS Endurance from the South Atlantic. This was the only ship left in this area, and so left the...

...Results of the FalklandsWar
1. Consequences for Argentina
* As a result of the Argentinean defeat, Galtieri was removed from power within three days of the surrender. Soon after this the military rule was over. The army no longer had authority over the Argentinean government. In 1995 10 members of the Junta, including Galtieri, were put on trial for crimes committed during the rule of the junta – they were sentenced to long term imprisonment.
* The government, under pressure from rising public opposition was forced to lift bans on other political parties. As a result in October 1983 the democratic elections brought to power Raoul Alfonsin of the Radical Party.
* Almost 700 Argentinean soldiers had died in the Falklandswar. The majority of these soldiers were used as cannon fodder against the highly trained British soldiers. Many soldiers could not forget the conflict they engaged in. It has been estimated that more ex-servicemen have since died by committing suicide than died in the war itself.
* Initially relations with Britain were badly damaged, however over the years the relationship has improved. In September 1985 the two countries signed an agreement to promote the search for gas and oil in the south-west Atlantic – this itself would hopefully stop any further conflict from occurring and encourage more cooperation in the future. Since then various visits have been made to...

...Was the FalklandsWar a political success or failure for the - Thatcher government? -
On 2 April 1982, the British political system was rocked by news of an extraordinary event eight thousand miles away in the South Atlantic. A long-standing and thorny dispute with Argentina over sovereignty of the FalklandIslands – a tiny relic of empire proximate to the South American mainland – had erupted with a sudden and unprovoked invasion of British territory by Argentine forces. Britain’s Conservative government faced the greatest crisis in foreign affairs for a generation (Freedman, 1988). Behind this audacious Argentine manoeuvre laid the assumption that the British Government – struggling with union strife, plunging popularity and a faltering economy – had neither the strength nor willpower to defend remote islands which most of its electorate had never heard of. On the contrary, General Galtieri – the head of Argentina's military Junta – had made one crucial error: he’d seriously underestimated Britain’s Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher. Dismissing pleas from her defence officials, Thatcher ordered a small taskforce to recover the Falklands in one of the most ambitious military undertakings in British history (Snow & Snow, 2007). Against all the odds, and spectacularly outnumbered, the British forces ‘yomped’ to a resounding and historic victory after only seventy-four...

...This research paper traces the history of Argentina's
dispute with Great Britain over sovereignty of the
Falkland/Malvinas Islands from the time they were discovered
though their seizure by Argentina in April 1982. It presents
opposing positions of Argentina and Great Britain on the
sovereignty issue, reviews diplomatic efforts to solve the
sovereignty question, describes the political and economic
situation facing the Argentine ruling junta in early 1982, and
provides details of the amphibious operation mounted by Argentina
to seize the Islands. The author offers his analysis,
conclusions, and opinions in the final chapter. The overall
intent of the paper is to provide the reader with insights into
how and why Argentina seized the Islands.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
INTRODUCTION 1
1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND THROUGH 1833 5
2 OPPOSING CASES FOR SOVEREIGNTY 12
3 DIPLOMACY 1964-1981 19
4 THE JUNTA AND HINTS OF AN INVASION 27
5 THE SOUTH GEORGIA INCIDENT 33
6 OPERATION ROSARIO 38
7 ANALYSIS, CONCLUSIONS, AND OPINIONS 45
FOOTNOTES...

...eight territorial claims to land in Antarctica south of the 60° S parallel before 1961. These claims have been recognized only between the countries making claims in the area. All claim areas are sectors, with the exception of Peter I Island. None of these claims have an indigenous population. The South Orkney Islands fall within the territory claimed by Argentina and the United Kingdom, and the South Shetland Islands fall within the areas claimed by Argentina, Chile, and the United Kingdom. The UK, France, Australia, New Zealand and Norway all recognize each other's claims. None of these claims overlap. Prior to 1962, British Antarctic Territory was a dependency of the FalklandIslands and also included South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. The Antarctic areas became a separate overseas territory following the ratification of the Antarctic Treaty. South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands remained a dependency of the FalklandIslands until 1985 when they too became a separate overseas territory.
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom (UK) is an island nation located in Western Europe. It has a long history of worldwide exploration and it is known for its historic colonies around the world. Today the UK's mainland consists of the island of Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) and Northern Ireland. In...

...Cloning is a naturally occurring phenomenon, as well as a human induced process. A clone is a living organism deriving from another, with identical set of genes. A naturally occurring anthropological example of a clone would be twins, a set of individuals with identical DNA. A laboratory-induced clone would be stem cell production and animal cloning. In the movie The Island by Michael Bay, the concept of cloning is used as a life insurance policy to elongate the life of a natural born individual. This medical use of cloning has been under the experimental stage for quite sometime now and under ethical question. There are three different ways of cloning, recombinant DNA technology or DNA cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning.
Recombinant DNA technology or DNA cloning is the transfer of a DNA fragment of interest from one organism to a self-replicating genetic material such as a bacterial plasmid. A gene is cloned by removing the DNA fragment of interest from the chromosome, by using restriction enzymes and then placing it into a plasmid, which was cut by the same restriction enzymes. Once the DNA fragment is attached with the plasmid it is called “recombinant DNA”, it can now be reproduced with the host cell. This isn’t fairly new technology, it’s been around since the 1970’s, and is widely used in molecular biology labs. When studying a particular gene, scientists tend to use bacterial plasmids to propagate multiple copies of the same gene....

...﻿The purpose of this paper is to analyze different team working experiences which emerged during the two rounds of the team game “Forbidden Island”. The experience of playing this collaboration game was overwhelming, and it gave us meaningful insights related to personal abilities and to team performance in general. Next sections of the paper contain the background information of the game and the team, analysis of team behaviour based on individual perception and based on the findings of organizational behaviour theories, and also provides a discussion on the consequences of this game, future modifications and the lessons which I should learn.
Background information
Forbidden Island is a visually stunning 'cooperative' board game. Instead of winning by competing with other players like most games, everyone must work together to win the game. At the beginning of the term, the class was divided into several small-sized self-management teams that would be responsible to learn how to play Forbidden Island together under minimal supervision. Because this is the team that we will work together on different projects throughout the term, we have introduced ourselves to each other, but we had very limited knowledge about each other. This would be considered as our first stage of Tuckman's stages of group development: forming. There are six members in my team. I will call them by J, B, O, P and K. Based on first...