A former top adviser to Barack Obama was among the list of public relations professionals and lawyers consulting Harvey Weinstein over a major New York Times story, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Anita Dunn, a top Obama campaign staffer and former White House communications director, helped offer damage control advice for the Hollywood mogul.

On Thursday afternoon, the New York Times published a major investigation into Weinstein that features on-the-record claims of sexual harassment, including from actor Ashley Judd.

The Hollywood Reporter and Variety reported Wednesday that the Times was working on the story on Weinstein’s personal “behavior." The two Hollywood trade outlets also reported that NBC News' Ronan Farrow is working on a piece about Weinstein for the New Yorker....Sources said that Lanny Davis, former special counsel to Bill Clinton, has been central to the PR effort for Weinstein, who is a major Democratic donor. Dunn, for her part, is the managing director of SKDKnickerbocker, a Washington public affairs firm with deep ties to Democratic politics. She was communications director for Obama’s 2008 campaign and served briefly in his administration.

Weinstein’s legal team is also a murderer’s row of high-profile names, according to Variety and THR: David Boies, Lisa Bloom (who helped bring down Bill O’Reilly), and Charles Harder (who helped Hulk Hogan fell Gawker).

All of the women involved should be forced to share in the blame simply for being alone with him. Not all the blame, but definitely 50%.

In all cultures and at all times, except our own, it was assumed that any woman of age, voluntarily alone with a man, had voluntarily agreed to fuck him. This goes double for powerful men who can benefit the woman in some way, like Weinstein could. Women have something to trade, and they use that something very aggressively with powerful men. Trump was right when he said "They let you do that." They know exactly what they are doing, but they also demand the option to play innocent in retrospect if they didn't get what they wanted out of the deal, like the lead in a movie...

Our culture is the stupid one, assuming that we can shame biology out of existence, or repeal biology by law. We cannot. Innate male and female sexual biology is the central fact of our existence. The facts of life. None of us would be here without it.

The solution is simple and ancient. A woman should never agree to be alone with an unrelated man unless she does in fact intend to signal to him that she wants to fuck him, right now. If she does agree to be alone with a man, courts should assume she intended to have sex with him.

The solution is simple and ancient. A woman should never agree to be alone with an unrelated man unless she does in fact intend to signal to him that she wants to fuck him, right now. If she does agree to be alone with a man, courts should assume she intended to have sex with him.

As a SV doctor, I use this presumption to my advantage. I see mostly housewives of engineer cucks who come to me for "service" and I bang every one of them, whether they want it or not. With healthcare premiums cut to the bone(r) I have to see 20-30 a day, its exhausting! Thanks Obamacare!

The whole point of sexual harassment complaint mechanisms is to give women the option to selectively enforce laws according to their whims and taste in men.

It has almost nothing to do with the actual behavior of men, which is pretty much constant by biological necessity (or else we simply would not be here to write and read these lines).

It's about expanding female power to use male power (police, courts, corporations) to maximize female sexual choice at the expense of most men. Women get to keep away the pathetic beta hordes and yet remain free to fling their maximum sexual provocation toward the very top of the male hierarchy, After sleeping with the the VP, or SVP, or CEO, they also want the option to call it harassment on his part if he doesn't call them back the next day.

It's a clever strategy. Who can argue in favor of "harassment"? No one. The problem is that the definition is so subjective and unevenly enforced that every single woman gets to define harassment in a way that personally benefits her the most.

It's only the masses of ordinary men who are being harassed these days. They should stop putting up with it.