12 Angry Men Essay

12 Angry Men Writing Assignment
Final Exam Project
Due: ________________________________________ (EDMODO)
You will see a lot of psychological phenomena exhibited in the movie 12 Angry Men. Many of these phenomena are listed in the boxes on the next page. Your task for this assignment is to watch the movie, take note of these various psychological phenomena, and then write a cohesive 2-3 page paper discussing these themes.
In writing your paper you must pick at least 5 separate incidences from the movie. For each incidence, describe how it relates to psychological phenomenon. Be sure to use concepts from across all of psychology. Do NOT, for example, just pick examples from social psychology (such as conformity and stereotyping);…show more content…

As we watch the movie, you can use the matrix on the next page in order to keep track of events and topics. Look over the items in the matrix (they all occur in the movie, along with others) before watching the movie, and reacquaint yourselves with the unfamiliar ones. Define each term before we begin watching the movie.

We see different views, different opinions of men such as altruism, egoism, good and evil. It is no doubt that human beings possess either one or any of these characteristics, which make them unique. our actions, beliefs, and choices separate us from animals and non-livings. The quote which was said by Maya Angelou states that “Prejudice is a burden that confuses the past, threatens the future and renders the present inaccessible.” We saw prejudice and stereotype from jury # 3 when he discriminates and assume that the boy was guilty because of his background and ethnic. Everyone deserve a

The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read
the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we
saw as a class. The play was so alive and made me really feel like I
was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the
murder of his father. The play showed how one man didn’t give up in
what he believed to be true. The play also showed a powerful leader
who fought till the end.
The play was about 12 jurors coming to the same verdict.…

COMM 132
October 2, 2014
Movie Paper (12 Angry Men)
In the Movie, 12 Angry Men, 12 jurors were tasked with finding a young man guilty or not-guilty of murdering his own father. In order for the men to fulfill their duty as jurors, they had to come to a consensus of whether the young man was guilty or not by working together, as a group, in order to analyze the trials evidence and testimonies, to then come to an agreement on the defendant’s guilt or innocence. As a group that was formed solely…

Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to…

A group is defined as “a collection of two or more interacting individuals who maintain a stable patterns of relationship, share common goals, and perceive themselves as being a group.” (Greenberg, p. 251). In the movie 12 Angry men (1957), twelve random jurors converge to form a jury committee. They are tasked with an important job of preparing a verdict in the case of sixteen-year-old teenager, who is accused with first degree murder of his father. They are to “separate facts from fancy” and “under…

The Social Interdependency Theory, would most certainly apply to the 12 Angry Men film in a variety of different ways. During the beginning of the film, it seemed that a multiple jurors participated in group-think during the decision making. Some jurors even stated that 5 minutes would be long enough and there was no more need for deliberation even though there was clearly much room for reasonable doubt. Negative Social Interdependence Theory began to come into play when the other jurors who were…

Main issues related to negotiation and conflict resolution
The movie “12 Angry Men” covers different negotiation and conflict resolutions. The communication is set in a jury room where people with different worldview are bargaining over the judgment of a murder case. Juror 8 is willing to stand alone with his vote “not guilty”. Trying to avoid the winner’s course, he demanded a conversation about the case despite the clear 11-1 vote on the guilt of the defendant. Juror 8 discredits his opponents’…

had never left the city nor state and just the thought of leaving their parents home terrified them. In recruiting school we learned a technique called feel, felt, and found. I use this strategy on numerous occasions in order to convince these young men and women on why the Army was a great choice.
An example of that would be a young man who had been working at a fast food restaurant to help support his mother and didn’t want to leave her. In order for me to overcome his objection I would attempt…

The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to…

In the film, 12 Angry Men, twelve disgruntled, sweat-covered jurymen are debating the verdict of a murder case. The audience gets unique insight into the deliberation of an emotionally-charged case. A young boy is accused of murdering his abusive father in their apartment and then fleeing the scene. The jury raises vital questions about the case that will ultimately form their decision. They must agree unanimously to either acquit the boy of his father’s murder or to send him to the electric chair…