Patents are irrelevant, RIM sells to corporate slaves and they want to keep it that way. They're just not interested in the consumer smartphone market.

Us corporate slaves have been EXCEEDINGLY DISAPPOINTED with the last three years of RIM; Many of us have embraced iOS and Android via Activesync and discovered that we can run powerpoints, flash video presentations and videoconference.

Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.

My company was already on Android officially and permitted BYOD on an "officially unsupported" basis, and more recently, they moved over to a pure BYOD model for all employees not engaged in full-time field work, using the Airwatch app to enforce security settings. Blackberry has lost their key advantage and the market isn't going to suddenly revert to 2003 and give it back to them.

They've been completely floundering and clueless for so long that they've lost all the trust that anyone had in them, as well as a lot of relevance in today's "there's an app for that" world. If you stir in a history plagued with some serious downtime issues, BBM security/privacy loopholes and try to overlook the stench of a company close to death and you have a pretty serious hurdle that RIM Blackberry aren't going to clear without a bit of RDF.

NEWSFLASH: Corporate IT departments don't succumb to RDF because they have remote beancounters in another department that aren't within the RDF area of effect.ANOTHER NEWSFLASH: Corporate IT departments are still 90%* of RIMberry's income.

*Yes, I made that up. It's a ballpark figure. You know it's probably accurate enough for my point to be valid though, so who cares how accurate it is?

Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.

I don't disagree there, but speaking as someone who works in business software, a lot of companies will stick with crappy vendors becuase That's The Way We Do Things Here(tm). My own firm totally phoned it in for about six years before somoene noticed they were getting a raw deal. Just because everyone in the company hates it doesn't mean the bureaucrats won't rubber-stamp the renewal like they do ever year...ask anyone who's ever been screwed by Dell but isn't allowed to get anything else. Rightly or wrongly, RIM is doing the business vendor thing of focusing on contracts and to hell with quality and everything else.

It is currently at $15.63 in after hours trading. At its peak the stock was over $144.

clone wrote:

their phone is reviewing very well,

This is what The Verge has to say:

"The Z10 is a fine device, well made, reasonably priced, backed by a company with a long track record. But it's not the only device of its kind, and it's swimming against a massive wave of entrenched players with really, really good products. Products they figured out how to make years ago. Products that are mature. The smartphone industry doesn't need saving.

If you love RIM and the BlackBerry brand and really want to keep supporting them, buying a Z10 wouldn't be a mistake. But I think there are better phones on the market, and I don't yet see a compelling reason for most customers to choose this phone over those better ones. So why the Z10? Why now? Until BlackBerry can answer that question, I would be careful about how you spend your money."

clone wrote:

but it was and is still far more secure which is why corporate clients have stuck with them as long as they have,

What? More secure? Tell that to Best Buy (who just kicked 10,000 BlackBerrys to the curb) http://goo.gl/EF20o Don't forget about the 17,000 BlackBerrys that were dumped by a US government agency http://goo.gl/xwdGq

"The company, which is rebranding itself BlackBerry after its best-known smartphone, has won millions of followers in these two Asian countries, mostly by selling cheaper handsets and offering service packages as low as $2 a month. So it's unlikely that the Z10 model introduced last week, which operators in India expect to sell for around $750, will appeal to the users it must reach if it is to build market share.

"It's clear that not only are India and Indonesia among the largest markets but in terms of future smartphone growth, they're amongst the ones with the most potential," said Melissa Chau, senior research manager at technology research group IDC in Singapore. "But the two devices that have been launched are not well aligned to the needs of these two markets.""http://goo.gl/2FehX

I'll play wait-and-see. I've used a Z10 for 15 minutes in a shop, we'll probably get some trial units next week.

We still have some corporate Blackberries in the office and whilst I hate the BES server, the older, simpler BB's are decent feature phones with good email capabilities and emergency maps/internet at a push which can go for a 48-hour trip without needing a recharge.

What Blackberry are lacking is apps:

Apple has all the apps

Android has nearly as many apps, plus the feel-good freedom you don't get in Apple's walled-garden.

Windows Phone doesn't have the apps, Microsoft are giving Windows Phone a ridiculous cash-based transfusion and it will either heammorage or become a third ecosystem with apps.

Palm died. Even though the concept was good it had no apps and HP murdered it before it had a chance.

Blackberry has no apps, and it is promising a walled-garden like Apple.

Call me a cynic, but how would you rank that list of ecosystems in terms of desirability?I didn't consciously put them in order just then, but perhaps I was pretty close by accident :\

Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.

Android has nearly as many apps, plus the feel-good freedom you don't get in Apple's walled-garden.

Blackberry has no apps, and it is promising a walled-garden like Apple.

On launch day the Z10 had 70,000 apps and it is growing all the time, they had a backlog on launch day waiting for approval. No other new OS launched with that many apps.

BB10 runs Android apps that have been repackaged. This is basically no work for the developer as all they need do is take the Android app, run a tool on it and it spits out a Blackberry .bar file that they then submit to Blackberry World. With Android's Linux background and BB10's QNX background, both OS are POSIX so doing a full native port is pretty easy as well.

Ah fair enough. I'd read that Android apps will be repackaged and emulated using a Gingerbread kernel on Blackberries, which will SUCK.

I haven't checked it out in too much detail yet, but if the apps are truly, genuinely there, that's half the battle won.

Congratulations, you've noticed that this year's signature is based on outdated internet memes; CLICK HERE NOW to experience this unforgettable phenomenon. This sentence is just filler and as irrelevant as my signature.

Android has nearly as many apps, plus the feel-good freedom you don't get in Apple's walled-garden.

Blackberry has no apps, and it is promising a walled-garden like Apple.

On launch day the Z10 had 70,000 apps and it is growing all the time, they had a backlog on launch day waiting for approval. No other new OS launched with that many apps.

BB10 runs Android apps that have been repackaged. This is basically no work for the developer as all they need do is take the Android app, run a tool on it and it spits out a Blackberry .bar file that they then submit to Blackberry World. With Android's Linux background and BB10's QNX background, both OS are POSIX so doing a full native port is pretty easy as well.

As long as it can make calls, do email, and schedule meetings, most large companies are going to be fine with that.

Yup, and with Blackberry Balance they can lock down the work side of the device so that the work data doesn't get seen by all the game apps, whilst with a quick swipe the owner can go play Angry Birds Star Wars happily.

I don't disagree there, but speaking as someone who works in business software, a lot of companies will stick with crappy vendors becuase That's The Way We Do Things Here(tm). My own firm totally phoned it in for about six years before somoene noticed they were getting a raw deal. Just because everyone in the company hates it doesn't mean the bureaucrats won't rubber-stamp the renewal like they do ever year...ask anyone who's ever been screwed by Dell but isn't allowed to get anything else. Rightly or wrongly, RIM is doing the business vendor thing of focusing on contracts and to hell with quality and everything else.

Affirmative. Not sure how this seems to be so common. There seems to be an exceptional amount of waste that occurs by people making decisions outside of their scope of knowledge. Happened at my last company very regularly, I'm guessing because of "process". I dunno, there seems to be an inverse relationship to the size of a company and how well its run.

I need to proofread my stuff before I submit it and buy a thesaurus. I used "seems" far too many times.