Trying to appease SJWs with a ‘diverse’ cover is a lesson in futility. Nothing and no one is EVER diverse enough for an SJW.

Regards,

Everyone

So, Vogue tried to do the whole diversity thing for their March cover touting the fact that the new norm in beauty is no norm. And as you can probably already imagine, the Left (predominately SJW types) were not happy with the cover.

Conventional-looking. What exactly does that mean? They’re lovely women of all shapes, sizes and skin tones … what, there’s not some hairy-legged cat hoarder on the cover? Sorry, a lot of people don’t want to look at that on purpose.

@voguemagazine this is exactly why I don't support Vogue. This is not the "norm."