Public Statements

Letter to Chairwoman Sutley - New Climate Change Litmus Test on U.S. Exports

Letter

Today, U.S. Senators John Barrasso (R-WY), Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Jim Inhofe (R-OK) wrote the Chairwoman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), Nancy Sutley, calling on the Council to refrain from issuing guidance that would require Federal agencies to consider greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) produced outside of the United States by American exports.

In the letter, the Senators cite their amendment that the Senate voted to adopt during the recent debate on the Senate Budget Resolution for Fiscal Year 2014. By passing this amendment with bipartisan support, the Senate made clear that it does not support imposing a climate change litmus test on American exports.

The Senators also highlight how CEQ guidance would discourage job creation and threaten future American export projects.

"Automobiles, commercial aircraft, and heavy equipment are among America's top exports. However, these goods are also among the world's largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions. Requiring Federal agencies to consider the greenhouse gas emissions produced by exports after they leave our shores would be profoundly short-sighted. It would threaten billions of dollars in American export projects and put thousands of good-paying American jobs at risk With millions of Americans out of work, the last thing the Administration should do is impose a climate change litmus test on these or any other exports. Instead, we must do all we can to increase American exports and the good-paying jobs they provide," the Senators wrote.

TEXT OF THE LETTER:

April 4, 2013

The Honorable Nancy SutleyChairwomanCouncil on Environmental QualityExecutive Office of the President722 Jackson Place NWWashington, D.C. 20503

Dear Chairwoman Sutley:

We understand that the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is preparing guidance for Federal agencies to address greenhouse gas emissions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We write to express our strong opposition to recent calls that CEQ require Federal agencies to consider greenhouse gas emissions produced outside of the United States by goods exported from the United States.

The Senate recently took up this issue during floor consideration of the Senate Budget Resolution for Fiscal Year 2014. On March 23rd, the Senate voted to adopt an amendment we offered that prohibits Federal agencies from considering greenhouse gas emissions produced outside of the United States by goods exported from the United States. During the debate on our amendment, the Chairwoman of the Senate Budget Committee accurately stated that the amendment reflected current law. We trust you agree with this conclusion and that your agency will not take any action to change or contravene current law. To do so would have devastating consequences for American manufacturers, their employees, and our nation's economy.

In January of 2010, President Obama set forth the goal of doubling our nation's exports in five years. More than three years later, our nation is not on pace to achieve this goal. Part of the problem is the Environmental Protection Agency has aggressively expanded its interpretation of NEPA to block exports of American goods. Ross Eisenberg of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) highlighted this issue in testimony before the Senate on February 12th. Mr. Eisenberg testified that NAM "strongly opposes using NEPA to require a cradle-to-grave, lifecycle impact analysis that assesses the impact of [exported] cargo." He explained that such a requirement "would create a very dangerous precedent that could be used to block exports of all types," including automobiles, commercial aircraft, and heavy equipment, such as tractors.

Automobiles, commercial aircraft, and heavy equipment are among America's top exports. However, these goods are also among the world's largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions. Requiring Federal agencies to consider the greenhouse gas emissions produced by exports after they leave our shores would be profoundly short-sighted. It would threaten billions of dollars in American export projects and put thousands of good-paying American jobs at risk. In 2012, for example, civilian aircraft, engines, and parts accounted for over $94 billion in exports. Aircraft, engines, and parts manufacturing alone employs over 400,000 people in the United States. With millions of Americans out of work, the last thing the Administration should do is impose a climate change litmus test on these or any other exports. Instead, we must do all we can to increase American exports and the good-paying jobs they provide.

Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to your prompt response.