You keep saying you don't dispute this and or that - only the magnitude of response.

what's that saying, "the facts of your vocation are in evidence, ma'am, and now we are merely negotiating on price?"

The magnitude of the response to CO2 could be completely hidden by solar or other forcings and negative feedback mechanisms, which would make the kind of burdens discussed a pointless imposition on the majority of people, to make a few people richer.

The Berkeley temperature project has been set up by the physicist Richard Muller to reinvestigate the temperature record in light of the problems found with the CRU's, and others' work

.
I don't have to speculate or suggest, there's clear evidence. Read the e-mails. When you're told 'the emails don't really say X', and they clearly do say X, that should be sufficient for you to see what's going on.

Watch the video. How much do you trust the IPCC's reports now?

You did this earlier in the thread, this video in context says the opposite of what you imply it does

There's no choice but to confront you, to engage you, to erase you. I've gone to great lengths to expand my threshold of pain. I will use my mistakes against you. There's no other choice.