Property rights and environmental conservation.

View/Open

Date

Author

Metadata

Abstract

The intention of this dissertation is not to embark on a discussion on the desirability of a
property clause, nor to undertake a full analysis of the property and environmental clauses
as they appear in both the interim and working draft constitutions.
Instead it is my intention to analyze the inherent conflict that exists between property rights,
specifically ownership, and environmental conservation. This will be assessed against the
backdrop of the common law, case law and in the light of both the interim and working draft
constitutions.
Due to the fact that the terms "deprived" and "expropriate", as used in both constitutions,
broadly correspond to the concepts of police powers and eminent domain, and since measures
taken in the name of environmental conservation are invariably carried out under the auspices
of the States police power, it is necessary to :-
(a) assess the "deprivation"-"expropriation" conflict and emphasise the ambiguity that can
arise in interpreting and differentiating between the two terms;
(b) draw a distinction between police power deprivations and expropriatory deprivations.
Foreign jurisdictions have experienced grave problems in drawing this distinction,
which has been further exacerbated by the concept of inverse condemnation. U.S
takings jurisprudence is analyzed to elicit the resultant chaos which will emerge if the
courts do not come up with an adequate solution. A possible solution is offered
which will provide the courts with an analytical framework within which to work; and
(c) assess, although to a lesser extent, the courts ability to review Parliamentary
enactments and administrative action.