GT Traffic 2.0

Aimed squarely at the commuting market, the GT Traffic 2.0 is a good looking urban bike with some neat features for coping with the urban jungle. It's easy to ride and a good low-maintenance option for daily duties.

GT are famous for their triple triangle designs; at the outset they claimed performance advantages for that third triangle formed by the seatstay passing round the seat tube and to join the top tube but over time it just became part of GT's design language, and made the bikes easy to distinguish. These days there are just a few triple triangle designs left in the range of which the Traffic is one– the Zaskar hardtail bringing the triple triangle bang up to date with a carbon rather than metal frame. The Traffic's 7000 series Aluminium frame is matched with a fork cut from the same cloth, and the 2.0 is built up with a low-maintenance, commute-friendly Nexus eight-speed drivetrain.

There's plenty of thought gone into the urbanisation of this bike. For a start, it comes as standard with Pinhead locking bolts to secure the seatpost and front wheel, which makes a lot of sense so long as you remember to bring the special key with you in case you get a flat. There's also one on the stem cap, though I don't expect there's a big trade in low-end Alu forks, but that's easy for me to say and I might think differently if I returned to my Traffic and found it minus the front end. The bike also features bumpers along the top tube, so you can lean your steed against walls and lampposts without doing too much damage to the paintwork.

GT have gone for minimal branding, and much of what is there is reflective. That's a great idea but they've missed a trick by putting most of the reflective decals on the back of the stays and the front of the forks, when it'd have been better employed increasing the bike's side visibility; you're going to have lights at the front and back anyway well hopefully you are - I'd have sacrificed some of that front visbility for more on the side. Other neat urban touches include the integrated rear light in the saddle (emergencies only!) and heavy duty tyres.

Once you're on board the bike is a really easy ride: the position is fairly upright (think Trek FX) and the controls all fall easily to hand. The Nexus hub gear isn't as good as the more expensive Alfine – it can be a bit vague and it's prone to the odd slip if you don't keep it well adjusted – but it's fine for town use and gives a range of gears wide enough to tackle the hills. The back-to-front shifter takes a bit of getting used to if you're already using thumbshifters elsewhere, and it's not the most ergonomic of units, but it works fine.

The Traffic's handling is very stable and the steering reasonably slow, so it's not going to get your heart racing through town but that would be missing the point. If you want to get from A to B without fuss and do it every day, and you're not worried about getting there in a hurry, a bike like the Traffic is what you need. At cruising pace it's unfluttered and simple to pilot and doesn't feel slow. Put the hammer down and it's a case of diminishing returns: the harder you try, the less efficient it feels, thanks to the heavy tyres, hub gear and upright position.

I mostly used the Traffic on 4-10 mile commutes and it's plenty capable over that kind of distance, though the big saddle gets a bit uncomfortable about five miles in. That's easily swapped though. You can fit mudguards and front and rear racks, and I used the bike with a child seat too without any fuss. It's not really a machine built for speed but swapping out the big Schwalbes for something a bit lighter (say a Halo Twin Rail) would quicken the ride, and you could always switch to a flat bar to lower the position a bit if you wanted.

At the RRP of £569 the Traffic 2.0 isn't cheap, especially when you compare it to something like the Carrera Subway 8 or the Revolution Courier Nexus, but it can be had for £100 less than that if you shop around, and at that kind of money it's a good choice for town duties, and a better looking urban machine than most.

Verdict

The Traffic 2.0 has a lot going for it: it's easy to ride, well thought out and sturdy. It would make a good low-maintenance everyday bike for someone who's mostly making short trips. It's a bit expensive at RRP but available cheaper if you shop around.

road.cc test report

Make and model: GT Traffic 2.0

Size tested: L

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

GT say: Street smarts pure and simple. New for 2010, the mid-level Traffic 2.0 packs all the commuting features you really need -- reflective paint, puncture-resistant tires, security hardware and a top-tube bumper --and puts them on an agile frame with a taller, more comfortable riding position.

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork

7/10

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

Solidly built with a tidy finish

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

7000 series Alu througout

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

Nice and upright for town

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

The bike isn't the most responsive but it's fine for town and towpaths, and comfy enough.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too felxible?

It's a pretty stiff platform

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

The Nexus hub can be a bit vague at times

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so, was it a problem?

No problems with overlap

How would you describe the steering? Was it lively, neutral or unresponsive? On the slow side

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

It felt upright and stable, good for pootling but not much fun if you're in a hurry

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:

7/10

Rate the bike for acceleration:

6/10

Rate the bike for sprinting:

3/10

Rate the bike for high speed stability:

8/10

Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:

9/10

Rate the bike for low speed stability:

8/10

Rate the bike for flat cornering:

7/10

Rate the bike for cornering on descents:

6/10

Rate the bike for climbing:

6/10

The drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance:

8/10

Rate the drivetrain for durability:

8/10

Rate the drivetrain for weight:

7/10

Rate the drivetrain for value:

7/10

Wheels and tyres

Rate the wheels and tyres for performance:

7/10

Rate the wheels and tyres for durability:

8/10

Rate the wheels and tyres for weight:

5/10

Rate the wheels and tyres for comfort:

7/10

Rate the wheels and tyres for value:

7/10

Controls

Rate the controls for performance:

7/10

Rate the controls for durability:

8/10

Rate the controls for weight:

7/10

Rate the controls for comfort:

7/10

Rate the controls for value:

7/10

Your verdict

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes, a good town bike

Would you consider buying the bike? Yes for a day to day short commuter, maybe not at full RRP

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Yes if they could get a bit of money off

Dave is a founding father of road.cc and responsible for kicking the server when it breaks. In a previous life he was a graphic designer but he's also a three-time Mountain Bike Bog Snorkelling world champion, and remains unbeaten through the bog. Dave rides all sorts of bikes but tends to prefer metal ones. He's getting old is why.

road.cc reviews

Here's how we roll at road.cc:

Every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a real insight into whether it works or not. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective, and we strive to ensure that all opinions expressed are backed up by facts, but reviews are always a reviewer's informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores. It reflects both a product's function and value. Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad. Here's what they mean: