<anish> so,
immediatedestination talks about the next hop, whereas wsa:To
talks about the 'final destination'

<anish> if this is correct,
then saying that anon means immediatedestination would not be
right.

<anish> david, I *think* i
understand what you mean (about anon and multi-hop)

<anish> since anon is defined
by the binding, and bindings address MEPs which define what
immediatedestination is, we are ok

<anish> is that roughly
right

<Zakim> dhull, you wanted to
say that anonymous won't work for multi-hop

<pauld> i made the point that
option#3 clarifies the status quo, adding semantics to an
anonymous To will impact at least one implementation good
enough to participate in CR testing and would therefore be a
"substantive change"

<Zakim> anish, you wanted to
see if there was any support to make [destination] optional