dear toole,
i know that you're a member of the A.E.S.,everything you wrote about listening tests for the purpose of assesment of louspeaker to find which kind of measurements had true correlation with
the subjective human perception of sound made a lot of sense,i gues that you use good ancillary electronis to drive the speakers...

Knew that M had to be an electrostat before I read the text :)
It would be interesting to drive a conventional loudspeaker system with a preceding EQ that simulated the M frequency response. Although this wouldn't help/hinder the directionality issues, I wonder if some listeners wouldn't key into the response and start raving about "transparency that only comes with small moving masses" etc.?

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

My Mom the Radio StarMax MaxfieldPost a commentI've said it before and I'll say it again -- it's a funny old world when you come to think about it. Last Friday lunchtime, for example, I received an email from Tim Levell, the editor for ...

A Book For All ReasonsBernard Cole1 CommentRobert Oshana's recent book "Software Engineering for Embedded Systems (Newnes/Elsevier)," written and edited with Mark Kraeling, is a 'book for all reasons.' At almost 1,200 pages, it ...