Related Posts

It’s not socialism. It’s Talmudism – jewish communism! If you don’t know by now that jews control everything, including Trump, then you never will. Very few truth seekers are prepared to take the red pill and go down the rabbit hole far enough for their world view to be even slightly challenged. This is the essence of the narrow road and sadly . . very few indeed there be that find it: https://saxonmessenger.christogenea.org/pdf/illuminati-exposed-beware-mark-part-1

TheWatchman

There is a saying in the circles I run that states, “To a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.” I’d caution you against finding a group of people upon which to blame all of the problems in the world, because categorical generalizations are statistically unlikely to be 100% correct. A more accurate statement would be to say that corrupt individuals are the source of a lot of our problems, or that people who have become accustomed to unlimited power in our nation are the source of a lot of our problems.

To blame all problems on “The Jews” is as much an ineffective argument as blaming all problems on “The Left” or “Neo-Cons”. We are all members of this nation. We are responsible for the actions, inactions, and rampant corruption that we see in our government. We elect people that make promises and then don’t hold them to account when the promises are broken and they line their own pockets while ruling us (as opposed to representing us, their true elected mission).

The first amendment is in place to protect our right to criticize government. The second amendment is in place to protect our other rights AND to keep the power of governance in the hands of the people. The founding fathers placed this system of protections in place so that we could maintain peace through superior firepower. It is OUR FAULT that our protected rights are being watered down. It is OUR FAULT that our politicians are embracing corruption and class warfare and social engineering and the future that is forming before us.

It is our right, our responsibility and our privilege to right the wrongs in our nation using the means that are protected by our founding fathers writings – The right to speak, the right to bear arms, freedoms of religion, protection from illegal search, the right to trial by our peers, and many more.

Semper Fidelis

Ray N.

This is primarily a spiritual issue and unless you understand the clear implications of that, then this simply becomes an intellectual argument with some well meaning to and fro banter. The narrative in your reply implies constitutional power that can be utilised by “we the people”, but those days are long gone.

As Michael Hoffman clearly observes:
Right wing campaigners against the alleged imminent imposition of Sharia law announce
that they are rigorously defending the “Constitution against Islam.” We have
never seen a single case where Islamic law profoundly influenced members of the
Supreme Court. We have, however, observed repeated Talmudic influence over how
the court interprets the Constitution in the modern era. Roe v. Wade being one
such example. Another is the “discovery” of a Constitutional right to legalize
the marriage of sodomites. It goes without saying that the Founders envisioned
no such right, just as the Bible made no allowance for a usurping Talmud
and it’s abundant degenerate filth.
Our nation is NOW under Talmudic law, not Sharia – not even close – though immense
troops of well meaning ignoramuses display their cluelessness as they crusade
with intense fervor against a non-existent menace, while oblivious to the very
real cancer eating at the bowels of our nation. This is all a distraction from our real enemy.
Few Americans have ever heard of the Guillotine Death by Noahide Laws
that PASSED CONGRESS in 1991 and signed into Law and was Approved March
20, 1991 by President of the U. S., George Bush Sr. These the Laws are now part and parcel of a totally corrupted American Legal
system.

TheWatchman

I respectfully have to disagree that the days are long gone when the citizens, protected by the constitution and armed with modern weaponry, hold the power. The similarities between our current situation and the one that Patrick Henry decried in the House of Burgess Address are nearly identical. Though we have tanks, jets and drones instead of cannons, muskets and bayonets, the challenge is still the same. Shake off the apathy of mindless servitude, gather our courage and resist the rampant spread of tyranny.

I admit, I’m ill equipped to discuss Talmudic and Sharia law. My reason for cautioning against generalizations was well intended. Having a group of people to blame is definitely cathartic, but it isn’t an aid that lends toward gathering for action. It is only through preparation, education, training and (once all other avenues are exhausted) action that you will begin to see that the power held over us is the true illusion, and that we were born free and educated into slavery.

Ray N.

Click the link – yes it’s a long read, but worth it – trust me!

Ray N.

There is also one hell of a difference between the Patrick Henry days and today. We have very few men with decency, honor, integrity and courage enough to take up arms against an entrenched establishment. Look at what happened to the Bundy’s – I rest my case sir . . .

TheWatchman

I have begun reading the information. As of the tenth page I believe we see things very similarly. I’m going to read the rest, and will let you know what I think of it if you wish.

As for the case of the Bundy confrontation, that was actually their second skirmish with the will of the federal government. The first, they won without a shot being fired. Simply the willingness of an armed militia to walk into the line of fire was enough to defuse the situation with the Bureau of Land Management. The second was only stopped by the government executing LaVoy Finicum as he had his hands up. It was, by definition, an armed and peaceful protest of the federal government’s land grabbing ways (by use of immanent domain laws that weren’t intended to create parks) that drew attention to the issue. It’s purpose was served, and Finicum’s death was a showing of the lengths to which tyrants will go to get their way. In a way, Finicum should be honored as much as any soldier or marine might get posthumously honored.

The quality of the men and women we are surrounded with only matters before and after the fact. When events continue turning the direction they have been turned, neutrality and passive responses won’t be possible. In the end, it won’t matter where the man next to you came from or who he was the day before. It will only matter where he decided to stand, and for what. This easy life, with all of it’s contrived complexity and created difficulty, is not even a shadow of the life that we could be living. Don’t give up on the sleeping giant, the people are still waking up.

Ray N.

Yes indeed I would be interested. You sound like a man after my own heart . . . .

Ray N.

While you’re recovering from that first link Watchman – here’s another that will seal the deal: