My favorite part will be when the guys from the other thread come in and try to say that because Woodward SAID he was threatened, that means he actually felt threatened and really truly couldn't be lying at all because Obama.

I guess it's worth keeping mind most beltway insiders are psychopaths that will say or do anything to promote themselves or their ideology at the expense of truth to massage the gears of power. Can't help feeling a little depressed at how transparent and pathetic this effort is tho. The republic is a mess and the 4th estate is infested with rats.

cameroncrazy1984:My favorite part will be when the guys from the other thread come in and try to say that because Woodward SAID he was threatened, that means he actually felt threatened and really truly couldn't be lying at all because Obama.

But... that's how it works for women.

/tell me I lie//Woody just pulled 'blacks on the corner' math///you know, where two blacks become a gang in the retelling by 'concerned citizens'

Bob Woodward has been coasting on reputation for 40 years. His credibility was tattered during the GW Bush administration and now he's finished shredding it. Dude's not a journalist - he's a catty elitist gossipmonger.

Why on earth did he reply with this if he came out and said it was a threat?

Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice. I am listening. I know you lived all this. My partial advantage is that I talked extensively with all involved. I am traveling and will try to reach you after 3 pm today. Best, Bob

netcentric:I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post.I think you will regret staking out that claim Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice.You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up....

Ohhhhhh....so they were veiled threats. Hidden in a psuedo politicking email. Or you could say a veiled apology.Gee....I wonder what he is apologizing for ??? Something the WH said in the phone call...?Hmmmm..... a heated phone call. But nobody threatened anyone. Nope. The apology was for nothing.

cameroncrazy1984:netcentric: I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post.I think you will regret staking out that claim Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice.You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up....

Ohhhhhh....so they were veiled threats. Hidden in a psuedo politicking email. Or you could say a veiled apology.Gee....I wonder what he is apologizing for ??? Something the WH said in the phone call...?Hmmmm..... a heated phone call. But nobody threatened anyone. Nope. The apology was for nothing.

Just.

What the fark, man?

Just based on the punctuation I thing WW might be back./Best part....forever!