Thursday, March 14, 2013

Whitney

Whitney and Alex decided to go away this weekend for their honeymoon finally. He wanted to go to Vegas and she nixed that. So he offered the lakehouse his family has and noted that his parents honeymooned there. So it was decided.

A plane ride later (with another couple wanting to swap seats), they're walking in the lakehouse.Alex: Psst. Let's do it.Whitney: Wait. She looks around the room.Whitney: Can people see us?Alex: Nope, nobody's around for miles.Whitney: Okay. Wait like nobody at all? That's kind of creeping me out.Alex: Alright, okay, we'll kiss first.Whitney: It's just this place is kind of reminding me of the house in Lake Blood.

Alex: I never seen it.Whitney: I watched it three times and to this day I hate being murdered.Alex: Whit, it's okay, I'm not going to let anything happen to you.Whitney: That's exactly what the lake said to the kid. What? What? Is the lake behind me?

Alex: No, somebody left the window open. That's a great way to let bats in.Whitney: Bats? You mean baby vampires? Okay, between the bats and the murderer, I'm going to leave here with no blood.

For a brief period, Whitney continued to worry that she'd be killed. At one point, they heard someone coming in (it was Alex's father) and Whit felt the need to confess, "Do you remember my brief bisexual phase? It wasn't brief and it wasn't that bi!"

I loved that and hope it means that we will see, in season three, one of Whitney's old female flames.

What if it was Lily! Or Roxanne. Though Roxie seems not the type. By that I mean that the flashback episode of Roxie in 2008 told us that she campaigned for Hillary (yea!), that she wasn't a drinker (and now she's always drinking) and that she wasn't able to be around people without doing couples talk.

By the way, Roxie looked really great this episode. The bangs at the start of the season were a mistake and have grown out and look very nice.

Thursday, March 14, 2013. Chaos and violence continue, Baghdad was
slammed with bombings today, Nouri continues to try to trick the
protesters, turns out the US Dept of Veterans Affairs doesn't care if a
veteran's contemplating suicide, and more.

Chair
Mike Coffman: Dr. Coughlin, on October 23rd, this Subcommittee asked VA
how many veterans have self-identified as suicidal and later committed
suicide in the follow up study of the national cohort of Gulf War and
Gulf Era veterans? On February 19th, VA responded stating, "VA has no
evidence to date that any veteran in the study has committed suicide."
Are these the same results you saw in your study?

Dr. Steven
Coughlin: Yes, fortunately we did not lose any of the research
participants. As I mentioned in my testimony, my efforts to identify
mental health professionals, get involved with the study as
co-investigators, place these call backs to vulnerable research
participants were initially blocked by my supervisors and that's why I
contacted the IRB in writing and also the VA Office of Inspector
General. After a delay of two or three months, we were able to start
the call back process and a team of mental health professionals at the
Washington DC VA Medical Center did a fantastic job of reaching out to
the veteran. We had vets who had been told by their local VA clinic or
hospital that they were not eligible for free health care but, when they
called the toll free number and reached somebody in VBA or the VA
central office, they were told the opposite. So the social workers,
they were able to sort this out and get them into health care. These
were vulnerable veterans, men and women who major depression or other
medical and psychiatric conditions and they needed assistance to get
into health care to save their lives.

Yesterday afternoon,
the House Veterans Affairs Committee held a hearing on Gulf War Illness
and other issues. US House Rep Mike Coffman is the Subcommittee Chair,
US House Rep Ann Kirkipatrick is the Ranking Member. Dr. Steve
Coughlin is a whistle blower. His statements are beyond our scope or
space -- in his opening statements, he was interrupted at one point by
Coffman who noted he was now over ten minutes with his opening remarks
(the limit is five minutes). But strong coverage of Coughlin's remarks
can be found in reports by Steve Vogel (Washington Post), Rebecca Ruiz (Forbes), Patricia Kime (Navy Times), Bryant Jordan (Military.com) and Kevin Freking (AP).

Some
background on whistle blower Steven Coughlin. Dr. Coughlin left the VA
in December. Prior to that, he was a senior epidemiologist with over
25 years of experience whose past also included a stint at the Center
for Disease Control. He resigned in December "because of serious
ethical concerns." His work was with the VA's Office of Public Health
which conducts studies on veterans and what he found was "if the studies
produce results that do not support the Office of Public Health's
unwritten policy, they don't release them. This applies to data
regarding adverse health consequences of environmental exposures such as
burn pits in Iraq and Afghanistan and toxic exposures in the Gulf War.
On the rare occasions when embarrassing study results are released,
data are manipulated to make them unintelligible."

In other words, you shouldn't trust VA's past studies on burn pits.

Under the leadership of Senator Byron Dorgan, the Democratic Policy Committee
did important work via a series of public hearings on the burn pits
that helped the country and the government understand what burn pits
were and what they did to veterans. Senator Evan Bayh was among those
serving on that Committee and he was the first to introduce a bill for a
national burn pit registry. It did not make it through while Bayh and
Dorgan were still in the Senate. If was picked back up and with the
help of many and leadership from Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Chair
Patty Murray and Ranking Member Richard Burr and House Veterans Affairs
Committee Chair Jeff Miller and Ranking Member Mike Michaud, it made it
through in the final days of 2012.

At a November 12, 2010 DPC hearing, Chair Byron Dorgan went over the burn pit basics.

Chair Byron Dorgan: Today we're going to have a discussion and have a hearing on how, as
early as 2002, US military installations in Iraq and Afghanistan began
relying on open-air burn pits -- disposing of waste materials in a very
dangerous manner. And those burn pits included materials such as
hazardous waste, medical waste, virtually all of the waste without
segregation of the waste, put in burn pits. We'll hear how there were
dire health warnings by Air Force officials about the dangers of burn
pit smoke, the toxicity of that smoke, the danger for human health.
We'll hear how the Department of Defense regulations in place said that
burn pits should be used only in short-term emergency situations --
regulations that have now been codified. And we will hear how, despite
all the warnings and all the regulations, the Army and the contractor
in charge of this waste disposal, Kellogg Brown & Root, made
frequent and unnecessary use of these burn pits and exposed thousands
of US troops to toxic smoke.

None of the DoD regulations were followed.

Burn pits is one of the issues we follow. Another is suicide.

Dr.
Steven Coughlin: I wish to close with a subject of particular
importance to me. Almost 2,000 research participants from a National
Health Study of a New Generation of US Veterans self-reported that they
had thoughts in the previous two weeks that they would be better off
dead. However, only a small percentage of those veterans, roughly 5%,
ever received a callback from a studied clinician. Some of those
veterans are now homeless or deceased. I was unsuccessful in getting
senior Office of Public Health officials to address this problem in the
New Generation study. I was successful in incorporating these callbacks
in the Gulf War survey and they have saved lives. but only after my
supervisors threatened to remove me from the study and attempted
disciplinary action against me when I appealed the refusal for callbacks
to a higher authority.

The VA has many issues and many
problems. It's biggest crisis is the number of suicides. VA hasn't
wanted to track that. Senator Patty Murray led the effort to get them
to do so. The VA, please understand what the doctor testified too,
conducted a survey of veterans of today's wars (Afghanistan and Iraq)
and one of the questions clearly was about suicide. In response to that
question -- either by checking off a provided choice or via their own
words in an open response -- 5% of the study group stated "that they
would be better off dead." This wasn't a, "Have you ever in your life
felt you'd be better off dead?" Instead, the time frame of the last two
weeks was inserted.

When military and veterans suicides are at
a crisis level, the idea that the VA would get these responses but
refuse to follow up by calling the 5% back is not just appalling, it's
negligence. And, in fact, this is a medical survey and its overseen by
doctors. That makes it even worse, that makes it medical malpractice.
In order to help the veterans, a callback should always be done.

But
if help is just too 'noble' a reason for you, the VA better damn well
grasp that any veteran participating in such a survey who did not
receive a callback has a group of loved ones who can sue and would most
likely win in a court of law. The law is on their side. Even more
importantly, public opinion would be on their side.

While it is
the right thing, the needed thing to do, a callback is also a
cover-your-ass move to prevent a lawsuit. Who's in charge at the VA?
Is anyone in management doing their job?

"We must recognize and
be prepared to address the consequences of that service and bring to
bear our best efforts to ensure that they are thoroughly prepared to
serve and when they return home we commit to making them whole again."
I'd love to say that was a statement from the VA officials attending the
hearing. However, that's more common sense than all the officials
combined had. Those are the words of Ranking Member Ann Kirkpatrick and
the VA needs to take those words to heart.

Chair Mike Coffman: Dr. Coughlan, your
written testimony stated that "On the rare occasions when embarrassing
study results are released, data are manipulated to make them
unintelligible." Please explain and cite an example.

Dr. Steven
Coughlin: [. . . microphone not on] examples can be cited. The best
example that comes to mind is we set out to analyze data from the
National Health Study for a new generation of veterans looking at
self-reported exposure to burn pits, oil well fire smoke, other
inhalation hazards in relation to physician diagnosed asthma and
bronchitis. The initial exposure analyses which were produced by the
writing group and statistician showed that a sizable percentage of the
deployed veterans had been exposed to burn pit smoke and burn pit fumes
were associated with asthma and chronic bronchitis. Then in a later
iteration of the tabulated results, those results were set aside or
discarded and the focus was instead on deployment -- deployment status
in relation to asthma and bronchitis. Well those 30,000 deployed vets
and those 30,000 non-deployed vets included veterans who served on ships
in the Indian Ocean or Philippines or in Germany in hospitals. In
other words, people who were deployed OAF and OIF and served in the war
on terror but were never in Iraq or Afghanistan on the ground and had no
potential exposure to burn pits. So the way that the refined results
were tabulated, it obscured rather than highlighted the associations of
interest. And I could elaborate if you would like.

Chair
Mike Coffman: Okay, Mr. Hardie, can you explain in your opinion why
the research advisory committee believes that -- why the research
advisory committee in their latest Institute of Medicine report is
flawed?

Anthony Hardie: Yes, thank you for that question.
First, I want to recognize that I believe the researchers --
distinguished researchers like the gentleman sitting next to me were
well intentioned. However, VA staff issued a scope of work and
committee charts that radically diverged from the law that effectively
prevented -- and also effectively prevented what the committee could
consider. I believe that these helped to prevent the IOM Committee from
meeting the expectations of the law. VA staff directed the panel to do
a literature review rather than, as the law directed, focusing on
physicians experienced in treating Gulf War Illness. VA staff knew
little such literature exists because of VA's two decades of failures to
develop treatments have helped to ensure that fact. Additionally, most
of the presenters to the panel focused on psychosomatic issues, stress
as cause and things like relaxation therapies as treatments. Ill Gulf
War veterans who called in to listen to that meeting were naturally
outraged. VA staff were among the presenters to that committee
including at least one sitting here today. VA staff muddied the waters
by instructing IOM to include not 91 Gulf War veterans as the law
directs but many others. And, finally, all of this involvement by VA
staff is a far cry from the previous claims that these panels operate
independent of bias and influence from the contracting agency.

Chair
Mike Coffman: Thank you, Mr. Hardie. Dr. Rosof, the law requires that
VA's agreement with the Institute of Medicine was to "Convene a group
of medical professionals who are experienced in treating individuals who
served. in the southwest Asia theater of operations of the Persian
Gulf War during 1990 or 1991 and who have been diagnosed with Chronic
Multiple System illness or another health condition related to
service." Of the members of your committee, how many have experience in
medically treating Gulf War veterans?

Dr. Bernard Rosof: [. . .
mike not on] members of my committee who had experience but all of the
members of the committee had experience in dealing with Chronic Multiple
System illness -- some directly with the veterans who served in those
theaters of war. In addition there are members of the Committee
including myself that have been on other IOM committees that have dealt
with the issues of Gulf War chronic multi-system illness or illnesses of
that sort. So there were -- There was considerable expertise sitting
around the table in addition to methodological expertise to evaluate the
literature on best treatments.

We're not interested
in the second panel. The lies weren't even believable. Five speakers
at one VA conference on Gulf War Illness and they all say that it's a
psychiatric disorder, even though for the last eleven years the VA has
(in writing) recognized that Gulf War Illness is a physical condition?
And Stephen Hunt thinks he can spin and eat up the time pretending a
slide shown at that conference stating that Gulf War Illness was all in
the head was somehow to provide people with a sense of how things have
changed? I don't like liars. The VA has played cheaply with people's
lives and that's offensive. Let's stay with burn pits. Over the
weekend, Jeff Glor (CBS Evening News -- link is video and text) reported on burn pits. Excerpt.Jeff
Glor: LeRoy Torres was a Texas state trooper and a captain in the Army
Reserves when he deployed for a year-long combat tour to Iraq in 2007.

Rosie
Lopez-Torres: The minute he got back, he was hospitalized. Right when
he got back, it was like, "Okay, it's the Iraqi crud." That's what he
kept hearing. After a few weeks, he started having these breathing
attacks and it was the scariest moment ever for us.

Jeff Glor:
LeRoy's wife Rosie says her husband's health issues resulted from
exposure to open-air burn pits which the US military used in Iraq and
Afghanistan to torch everything from batteries to body parts. The Dept
of Veterans Affairs acknowledged Balad, where Torres was based, disposed
of "several hundred tons per day"

LeRoy Torres: It was very close to the burn pits -- where I was housed at. But we didn't think nothing of it.

Jeff
Glor: Today, at age 40, LeRoy is barely able to leave bed most days.
His doctors have diagnosed him with a lung disease, constrictive
bronchiolitis. He has a lesion on his brain and cysts in his spleen and
groin.

LeRoy Torres: Sometimes the headaches will last three
hours. Sometimes I've had it where I've had a headache for eight days
-- eight days straight. It's unexplainable.

Rosie
Lopez-Torres: I remember one night thinking, "Who am I holding? Like
what happened to the man that I married?" It was at that moment that I
thought, "This is it. I'm going to have to be his advocate."

Jeff
Glor: Rosie launched a website where those exposed to burn pits can
register. She also lobbied Congress to take action. In January,
President Obama signed a law giving the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
one year to create a national registry to track potential burn pit
victims.

Jeff Glor: If it wasn't for Rosie Torres, would this law be in existence?

Dr. Anthony Szema: I don't think so?

Rosie
Lopez-Torres has shared her family's story many times in an attempt to
get the word out and raise awareness. In January of last year, she wrote about the experience:

For thousands of reservists the story
goes like this, the soldier returns from war and immediately the effects
of toxic exposure surface like the invisible wounds that they are. The
soldier begins seeking treatment at various healthcare facilities only
to discover that neither DOD nor VA is acknowledging toxic exposure from
particulate matter or burn pits. The only option left if you happen to
be blessed with the luxury of private insurance is to seek specialized
healthcare in the private sector. Desperately seeking answers to the
question of why this once active and healthy soldier can no longer
function at the capacity that he/she once did. Why the once healthy
father/mother, husband, wife, daughter, son can no longer breathe, why
the diagnosis of cancer, why the white matter and the lesions in the
brain, the fertility issues, the fatigue, the parasitic infections, the
list goes on and on. The family spends their life savings traveling to
access specialized healthcare from the physicians they call their
heroes. The only healthcare providers brave enough to stand behind the
truth of how toxic chemicals affect the body.

The
family exhausts all of their finances to gain answers, the soldier can
no longer work due to multiple diagnosis and symptoms immediately
forcing the once successful career person to give up their life-long
dreams. The reservists files an LOD which can take up to two years, the
veteran files a claim with the VA which will never grant a rating
compensation because there is no category for toxic exposures. All of
this forces the family into an abyss of darkness, mental stress,
financial stress, and denial of acceptance to their new way of life. The
once productive, healthy, and functioning military family is suddenly
falling apart at the seams. The gap between VA and DOD for the reservist
component of the military service members wounded must be bridged by
identifying the needs of those affected immediately. Too many people are
losing their homes, their life savings, and their hope, hope in a
system that once promised to care for them once they returned.

A
friend covered a Senate Veterans Affairs hearing that took place
yesterday and was full of praise for Allison Hickey. I don't like
liars. Hickey's damn lucky that people are so uninformed (that includes
my friend) and that I wasn't present so I can't cover it. If I were,
I'd go into her little lie to the Committee that Agent Orange has caused
backlogs. I'd point out her lie to the committee in the previous
Congress that the VA had no Agent Orange backlog. Hickey can be very
impressive . . . if you're new to her. If you've seen her lie once
though . . . I wasn't at that hearing, yesterday morning I was at the
Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel and we covered the first
two panels in yesterday's snapshot. Kat covered the third panel in last night's "Senate hearing on assault and rape"

Today Baghdad was slammed with a series of bombings today. Reuters counts at least 25 dead and at least fifty injured. Alsumaria counts 26 dead and fifty-six injured. Al Arabiya says
at least one was a car bomb and that "blasts went off near the foreign
ministry, culture ministry and an office of the communications ministry
in the Allawi neighbourhood in the centre of the capital." Adam Schreck, Qassim Abdul-Zahra and Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) add that in addition to a car bomb, it is thought that a suicide bombing also took place. BBC News reveals, "Reports say least three explosions, including two car bombs and a
suicide blast, went off near a building currently housing the justice
ministry. A police officer, who was among the security forces sent to
clear the building, said about six gunmen wearing police uniforms were
still inside the building." RT elaborates, "Reports said a group of militants wearing police uniforms attempted to
storm the Justice ministry building after a series of explosions,
including at least two car bombs and a suicide bombing, rocked the area
surrounding the ministry." Norman Hermant (Australia's ABC) notes, "An official in Baghdad's security command centre said three fighters
were killed inside the justice ministry building, but ministry spokesman
Haidar al-Saadi said the clashes had occurred outside. An
interior ministry official, however, said two fighters were killed in
clashes while two others were suicide bombers who blew themselves up,
one of whom did so near the justice minister's office." Employees inside the Ministry of Justice during the attack tell All Iraq News
that assailants entered the ground floor and began firing at workers
and that "The ground floor of the ministry building is almost completely
destroyed and there is blood on the floor."

U.S. EMBASSY BAGHDAD Office of the Spokesman __________________________________________________________________________ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARCH 14, 2013

The U.S. Mission in Iraq Condemns the March 14 Terrorist Attacks on the Ministry of Justice in Baghdad
The U.S. Mission in Iraq condemns in the strongest terms the terrorist
attacks today on the Iraqi Ministry of Justice in Baghdad. Our
condolences go out to the families of the victims of these attacks, and
we hope for the speedy recovery of those injured. The United States
will continue to work with the Government of Iraq to combat those who
would perpetrate such atrocious and senseless crimes.

The United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq issued the following today:Baghdad, 14 March 2013 – The United Nations marked
the International Women’s Day through a series of activities across Iraq
under the theme of ‘Time for Peace, Stop Violence against Women’.
In Baghdad, the State Minister for Women's Affairs, Ms. Ibtihal
al-Zaidi, and former and current women members of parliament involved in
the ‘Women for Lasting Peace Initiative’ met with UN officials and
leaders from the whole political spectrum – including Deputy Prime
Minister Saleh al-Mutlak, chairman of the National Alliance Ibrahim
al-Jaafari and Chief of Staff in the Prime Minister's Office Hamed
Khalif Ahmed – for a roundtable discussion at the UN headquarters on 11
March.
“In the current political climate, it is a strong statement to see
women of different political convictions overcoming their differences to
speak with one voice to promote a peaceful solution to respond to the
protracted political crisis,” remarked the Deputy Special Representative
of the United Nations Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Mr.
Gyorgy Busztin, after the event, which also included live music and an
exhibition of paintings by young artists.
Mr. Busztin commended the Government of Iraq for endorsing the
National Strategy to Eliminate Violence against Women. He also welcomed
the launch, on 12 March, of a Violence against Women Data Gathering and
Monitoring System, which marked the successful conclusion of a joint
effort by different ministries and non-governmental organizations, with
the technical support of the United Nations, to establish a system to
provide data to promote evidence-based planning to eradicate violence
against women.
“Measurement will help us show the range of problems that women face
in Iraq,” said Ms. Frances Guy, UN Women Representative for Iraq. “As
government services meet the identified needs, we will be able to
measure progress.”

Nice words but the reality is
women continue to suffer in Iraq. They weren't even a member of Nouri's
Cabinet until massive uproar in January 2011. The suffering really
can't be prettied up. Sami Ramadani shares his thought on the pain of the last ten years at the Guardian:We haven't even counted the dead yet, let alone the injured,
displaced and traumatised. Countless thousands are still missing. Of the
more than 4 million refugees,
at least a million are yet to go back to their homeland, and there
still about a million internal refugees. On an almost daily basis,
explosions and shootings continue to kill the innocent.The US and UK still refuse to accept the harmful consequences of radioactive depleted uranium munitions, and the US denies that it used chemical weapons in Falluja – but Iraqis see the evidence: the poisoned environment, the cancer and deformities.
Lack of electricity, clean water and other essential services continues
to hit millions of impoverished and unemployed people, in one of the
richest countries on the planet. Women and children pay the highest
price. Women's rights, and human rights in general, are daily suppressed.And
what of democracy, supposedly the point of it all? The US-led occupying
authorities nurtured a "political process" and a constitution designed
to sow sectarian and ethnic discord. Having failed to crush the
resistance to direct occupation, they resorted to divide-and-rule to
keep their foothold in Iraq. Using torture, sectarian death squads and billions of dollars,
the occupation has succeeded in weakening the social fabric and
elevating a corrupt ruling class that gets richer by the day, salivating
at the prospect of acquiring a bigger share of Iraq's natural
resources, which are mostly mortgaged to foreign oil companies and construction firms.

Surveying the tragedy, Jonathan Schell (The Nation) observes of the illegal war:Is there any benefit to be found in this record? Only if, it seems, by
drawing lessons from the disaster, we can avoid future misadventures of a
like kind. One lesson that may be on its way to acceptance is that in
our postcolonial era, “COIN” (counterinsurgency) warfare is a fool’s
game. A related lesson is that neither the United States nor any other
country can “build” other peoples’ nations. Those peoples have to do
that by themselves, or fail by themselves. But these lessons are hardly
new; they were taught at terrible cost a half-century ago by the Vietnam
War. They were then unlearned in preparation for the “regime change”
wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

There is no democracy in Iraq. Reuters notes, "Iraq's power-sharing government has been all but
paralyzed since U.S. troops left more than a year ago and Prime Minister
Nuri al-Maliki, a Shi'ite, is facing protests in the country's Sunni
heartland, which shares a porous border with Syria." Alsumaria reports
that Nouri al-Maliki, chief thug and prime minister or Iraq, declared
yesterday his desire to meet the demands of the protesters. Really?
Because the protests have been going on since December and Nouri and his
State of Law have refused to meet the demands thus far. In fact, March 1st, at the Ramadi protest, Minister of Finance Rafie al-Issawi resigned. al-Issawi told Kitabatthat
he resigned because there had been over 70 days of protest and the
government had still not responded to the protesters. He noted that a
government is supposed to be responsive to the people, not ignore them.
He told Alsumaria that
Article IV -- which has been used to punish so many Sunnis -- is no
longer going to work and that the government refused to listen to the
protesters or to take accountability for the eleven shot dead in Falluja
by Nouri's forces January 25th. He feels the solution to the crises
facing Iraq can be found in the sit-ins taking place.

Some fools and suck-ups will point to Nouri's for-show release of
prisoners -- ignoring the fact that a list of those released has not
been produced and that, most importantly, you're not meeting the demands
of the protests if every day you're ordering mass arrests. 38 arrested in Wasit Province alone today.
You're not addressing the issue of the imprisoned with a few token
releases as every day you continue your mass -- and ridiculous --
arrests. Iraq needs to be publicly rebuked globally for arresting the
wives, spouses, children of suspects. You don't arrest people for who
they're related to. That's ridiculous and it's offensive. Article IV
of the Constitution is a problem as well because it adds to
innocents arrested by allowing you to be arrested merely for being
related to a suspect -- you can be the mother of someone suspected of a
crime and be arrested because you're the mother (or father, brother,
sister, child, grandparent, etc). And one of
the demands of the protesters is for Article IV to be dropped. That's
not a new
demand, it's been a demand for months now. And the protesters are more
than aware that the mass arrests continue. This morning, Iraqi Spring MC has even Tweeted about 71 Diyala prisoners being transferred to a Baghdad prison.

Nouri's done nothing to meet the demands of the protesters. He's
pulling his usual stall, stall, try to exhaust your opponent m.o. that
he always utilizes. Dan Murphy (Christian Science Monitor) observes:Iraq’s Sunnis have gotten the short end of the stick from
Maliki, who is theoretically the head of a "power-sharing" government
designed to address sectarian grievances, but in practice has been
running the country by fiat since the US departure from Iraq at the end
of 2011. A growing protest movement among the Sunni population,
particularly in Anbar, where the fiercest engagements of the US war in
Iraq were fought, has been volatile.
In January, government troops killed five protesters in Fallujah, the
town that US infantry and Marines tried to “pacify,” twice.

National Iraqi News Agency quotes
a police source stating, "Unidentified gunmen kidnapped on Thursday 14,
March, the tribal Sheikh Qais al-Janabi and his son, who is a candidate
for the next local elections, Abdul Karim Qais and five of their
relatives. The gunmen forced the seven people, at gunpoint, to get out
of their car in the Siniah area of Baiji, north of Tikrit, and were
taken to an unknown destination."

The tribal leader is linked to the ongoing protests. As this Facebook post makes clear,
the protesters believe this was done by a government militia and is
part of Nouri's continued crackdown and targeting of the protesters.
Why might they think that? Well there's Nouri's history of targeting
the protesters. There's the fact that, remember the photo from Iraqi Spring Media Center,
his federal forces have been videotaping the protesters and following
them to their homes in an attempt to intimidate them. There's also the
fact, as Yang Yi (Xinhua) reports, that the kidnappers have a demand, "Later in the day, the kidnappers phoned Qais family and
told them to write a statement calling for the people not to
participate in the invalid elections and publish it on local
television."

Al Mada reports
that a spokesperson for the demonstrators has called out Nouri's puppet
Saadoun al-Dulaimi, stating al-Dulaimi is using the military against
the protesters. Saadoun al-Dulaimi is the 'acting' Minister of
Defense. There's no such position in the Iraqi Constitution. The
Constitution mandates that the Prime Minister-Designate name a full
Cabinet and do so within thirty days or another Prime Minister-Designate
is named and he or she has 30 days to name a full Cabinet. Nouri's
second term has nothing to do with the Constitution. Having lost the
popular vote, he had no claim on a second term. But Barack Obama wanted
the US-installed puppet to remain in charge so the US brokered The
Erbil Agreement which circumvented the Constitution and gave Nouri a
second term as prime minister.

The National Iraqi News Agency reports
that KRG President Massoud Barzani declared today that the Kurds will
either be partners in Iraq or they will take the measures they see
necessary. Barzani's referring to Nouri's refusal to honor agreements,
"He stressed that the cause of the political crises that took place is
not to abide by the constitution, noting that the solution to this
crisis is the implementation of the Arbil Agreement 2010, which he
described as 'a road map to end the crisis'."

For those who forgot or never knew, after Nouri's State of Law came in
second place to Ayad Allawi's Iraqiya in the March 2010 elections, Nouri
refused to allow the Constitutional process to begin. The minute it
began, he wasn't prime minister. So he refused to step down, he refused
to abdicate. He held the country hostage. He was only able to get
away with that because both the White House and the Iranian government
were backing him. For eight months, he held the country hostage. The
press tended to play down the significance of the political stalemate.
They tried to act it was normal. Or argue that it was only a few votes
more. You only one more vote than the other candidate to win an
election. A win is a win.

After 8 months when Parliament couldn't meet, when the government had
been at a standstill, the US approached the various leaders of the
political blocs and told them (a) Nouri could hold out for another 8
months so (b) be mature and put Iraq's interests ahead of everything
else and (c) agree to give Nouri a second term and (d) in exchange, it
will be put in writing and you can get promises from Nouri in writing
about things you want. For the KRG, that included the implementation of
Article 140.

Right there you see the problem with Nouri as a leader. The Kurds were
bargaining with him in November 2010 to implement Article 140.

They shouldn't have.

Nouri took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He became prime minister
in 2006. The Constitution declares that Article 140 has to be
implemented. It even had a timeline, by the end of 2007. Nouri refused
to do it.

There never should have been a negotiation with Nouri to get him to
follow the Constitution. If he can't follow it, he can't be prime
minister.

So everyone threw in a demand or two. It was all written up, the US
government assured the political leaders that this was a binding
contract and that, most important, the US government would stand behind
this contract. The leaders signed off.

Nouri used it to get his second term. The Parliament finally held their
first meeting. Iraqiya demanded Nouri name Ayad Allawi to head an
independent national security council -- one of the legal clauses in the
contract. Nouri said he couldn't. Not yet. It was too soon. The
bulk of Iraqiya walked out of Parliament. The US cajoled them and got
them back inside. Nouri's going to follow the contract, just give it
time. It's the first day.

He never followed the contract. To this day.

And all those promises from the White House? Never followed up on.
It's why the US' image is so poor in Iraq today. The changing from Bush
to Barack gave the US image a lift in Iraq. There was hope among
Iraqis that President Barack Obama would be different. But all he's
done is disappoint. Barzani was speaking at the Kurdish Genocide International Conference in Erbil. All Iraq News notes,
"The Confence was held on the 25th Anniversary of bombing Halabcha city
by the chemical weapons in the 1980s by the former regime." Al Jazeera, the Christian Science Monitor and PRI's Jane Arraf Tweets of the conference: