Practice and Assignment problems are not yet written. As time permits I am working on them, however I don't have the amount of free time that I used to so it will take a while before anything shows up here.

You appear to be on a device with a "narrow" screen width (i.e. you are probably on a mobile phone). Due to the nature of the mathematics on this site it is best views in landscape mode. If your device is not in landscape mode many of the equations will run off the side of your device (should be able to scroll to see them) and some of the menu items will be cut off due to the narrow screen width.

Section 3-5 : Reduction of Order

We’re now going to take a brief detour and look at solutions to non-constant coefficient, second order differential equations of the form.

In general, finding solutions to these kinds of differential equations can be much more difficult than finding solutions to constant coefficient differential equations. However, if we already know one solution to the differential equation we can use the method that we used in the last section to find a second solution. This method is called reduction of order.

Note that upon simplifying the only terms remaining are those involving the derivatives of \(v\). The term involving \(v\) drops out. If you’ve done all of your work correctly this should always happen. Sometimes, as in the repeated roots case, the first derivative term will also drop out.

So, in order for \(\eqref{eq:eq1}\) to be a solution then \(v\) must satisfy

\[\begin{equation}2tv'' - 3v' = 0\label{eq:eq2}\end{equation}\]

This appears to be a problem. In order to find a solution to a second order non-constant coefficient differential equation we need to solve a different second order non-constant coefficient differential equation.

However, this isn’t the problem that it appears to be. Because the term involving the \(v\) drops out we can actually solve \(\eqref{eq:eq2}\) and we can do it with the knowledge that we already have at this point. We will solve this by making the following change of variable.

\[w = v'\hspace{0.25in} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.25in}w' = v''\]

With this change of variable \(\eqref{eq:eq2}\) becomes

\[2tw' - 3w = 0\]

and this is a linear, first order differential equation that we can solve. This also explains the name of this method. We’ve managed to reduce a second order differential equation down to a first order differential equation.

This is a fairly simple first order differential equation so I’ll leave the details of the solving to you. If you need a refresher on solving linear, first order differential equations go back to the second chapter and check out that section. The solution to this differential equation is

\[w\left( t \right) = c\,{t^{\frac{3}{2}}}\]

Now, this is not quite what we were after. We are after a solution to \(\eqref{eq:eq2}\). However, we can now find this. Recall our change of variable.

This is the most general possible \(v(t)\) that we can use to get a second solution. So, just as we did in the repeated roots section, we can choose the constants to be anything we want so choose them to clear out all the extraneous constants. In this case we can use

\[c = \frac{5}{2}\hspace{0.25in}k = 0\]

Using these gives the following for \(v(t)\) and for the second solution.

If we had been given initial conditions we could then differentiate, apply the initial conditions and solve for the constants.

Reduction of order, the method used in the previous example can be used to find second solutions to differential equations. However, this does require that we already have a solution and often finding that first solution is a very difficult task and often in the process of finding the first solution you will also get the second solution without needing to resort to reduction of order. So, for those cases when we do have a first solution this is a nice method for getting a second solution.