[geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation

From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:23:12 +1000

Thats an ingenious idea Paul.. Something I never visualised.. another way of
twisting a cable? Now I know why my hose twists up as I walk around the yard
watering.. I'll have to learn to retrace my steps .. Have you investigated
the bank/money /Government borrowing scam yet? Your life does depend on it..
Phil.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:59 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation
Bernie B
Well done -- no equivocation!
I've added to the drawing. There is now a rubber band fitted between two
hooks on the bottom of the ball and two hooks on a fixed object mounted below
the centre of the thin, circular metal rod.
I now ask you another question. If the ball is propelled around the circle,
will the rubber band show twisting? Further, will the twisting not be in fact,
one twist for each and every trip the ball makes around the circle?
In another post this thread -- From philip madsen Mon Nov 24 21:36:28 2008,
he has presented you with excellent advice. Study it, understand it. It is the
truth.
In another post this thread -- From Bernie Brauer Mon Nov 24 15:39:38 2008,
you said -
It actually also works against heliocentrists because
who could believe their synchronized Moon rotation explanation?
The odds are way against that type of order in an exploding universe.
As has been mentioned previously by others, it doesn't make a jot of
difference what you believe, or what others believe -- what matters is what is.
Arguments about how many teeth a horse might have is not the way to go. The way
to go is to go and count them. Well metaphorically speaking, so far as the
phenomenon of synchronised orbits of moons is concerned, the teeth have been
counted. Most of the large moons in the solar system have their rotations
synchronised with their revolutions. Even further, there is one planet which
has an orbit where the rotation is synchronised with the revolution though it
is not 1:1 but rather 1.5:1. I'll not spoil your joy of discovery though --
you'll be thrilled to discover it for yourself.
Paul D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 24 November, 2008 3:19:47 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation
Paul,
Yes, that looks like a fair representation.
"All rigid body movements are rotations, translations, or combinations
of the two."
So the movement of the Moon is a translation, but there
is no rotation. The Moon is fixed within the rotating firmament.
Bernie
--- On Sun, 11/23/08, Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moon Rotation
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, November 23, 2008, 11:56 PM
Bernie B
You said to Philip -- From Bernie Brauer Sat Nov 22 07:58:12 2008
If you go dwon to your local day-care centre ( where toddlers get
dropped off so mummie can go to work to help daddy pay 66% ALL-TOTAL taxation
) you will see a toy where you can slide a wooden sphere along a circular thin
metal rod. So the sphere is fixed upon the circular rod and the same point
always shows inward.
I have attached an illustration of what I think you have described
but with the small addition of a straight, thin, light, paper tube attached to
the wooden ball so as to indicate visually that it always points to the centre.
The ball -- with the indicator -- is shown travelling around the circular rod
in a clock-wise direction.
Is this a fair representation? Please indicate any reservations or
arguments you may have.
Paul D
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter Now.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter Now