Not as much as football stars, but yes, they make reasonably good money.

We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.

Originally Posted by vic_orthdox

In the end, I think it's so utterly, incomprehensibly boring. There is so much context behind each innings of cricket that dissecting statistics into these small samples is just worthless. No-one has ever been faced with the same situation in which they come out to bat as someone else. Ever.

Yeah, Recently I read england and Australian make more money than others. Infatc even West Indies pays more money than the Indian Board.. I guess the other nations dont give that much money to their players...

new zealand have i tihnk a ranking scale where they hand ou20 contracts and 1 gets the most 20 he least ect. i think he minimum is something quite low like $40 000 plus match fees and stuff but i could be way off

new zealand's contracts are based on performance and whether you play tests, odi's, or both and other factors. the highest paid is about $120,000 retainer and then it goes down until the 20th contracted player who gets paid $40,000. this isn't including match fees or sponsorship.

I guess there is a lot more money in the game then there used to be a few years back. Its time that the game is nurtered and turned into a global entertainer. Imagine the US putting up their 11. what do you guys think??