Madhawa Chathuranga: Bajaj 135 is a crap.difficult to handle.cant compare with the best of YAMAHA & HONDA﻿

mofockadu75au80-zetrei: pulsar 135 or FZ-S 2.0?﻿

srisainet srisai (sainet): I have fz16 2008 model.,, i spend around 8k until now., the mielage its 42kmpl riding still power and pickup r great﻿

sunil gupta: Nice﻿

Sahil Chitnis: hello ! I am interested in buying a bike with good milege and decent power and stylish looks. Which should i choose between cb twister or bajaj 135ls? Also give me any other options better than these two.......my budget is 72k max on road pune .....thanx once again.﻿

Rohan Baidya: Nice presentation but it's cheaper to buy bikes at threshold of 125 when it comes to tax. :P Just saying.﻿

Shekh D: Pulsar 135 has vibes but they are only at certain speed of 65 to 70 kmph but other than that engine is quiet refined for the most of the time.i will complete 4 years of ownership of Pulsar 135 on April this year, what i can say it's such a great bike it way ahead of previous Bajaj bikes. Only down side of this bike on engine point of view is frequent decarbonising of the head and rusting of certain Nut bolts.But believe me Bajaj new Bikes are coming with High quality Nut Bolts which don't get rusted.The main problem of performance bikes in India is their Good quality after sales service.﻿

Sampath Jayasundara: i have pulsar 135ls..also ride fz16..please guys dnt believe presenters advice..135ls no match for fz16..135ls has vibration,ride is not comfortable..fz16 the king of street﻿

Sreenath P: Bajaj cannot compete with japanese giants Honda & Yamaha especially in engine refinement and overall reliability.. main agenda of bajaj is their low price tag in wch most of the customers wld fall..& I dont understand evn in thz so cald technical review Pulsar emerged as winner for the sole reason of price tag..!!!﻿