Draft quality framework for scicomm

Following the Scoping the Professionalisation of Public Engagement with STEM session at the BIG Event, Helen Featherstone has written a blog post which summarises the draft framework developed in the session.

VERY much a first draft, she has tried to use the language used in the session so you can get a feel for how far we got in one hour and so she doesn’t misinterpret what was said They are not placed them in any order of priority.

Helen is really interested to hear your views on this. Does it ring true for your work? What should we change about the language? What’s missing? Is there anything here that doesn’t apply to your work? Does it remind you of other frameworks that we should be looking at? Should the order change?