Should Pakistan be expected to negotiate with terrorists who reject Pakistan’s constitution, democracy and engage in violence?

There is a certain Alice in Wonderland quality to the Pakistani government’s now on again decision to “negotiate” with the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Let’s be clear first, that the TTP, also known as the Pakistani Taliban, are not the same as the Afghanistan Taliban. The latter consider themselves to be freedom fighters working to rid their country of foreign occupiers.

The Pakistani Taliban on the other hand are a purely local movement. Based largely in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) province they want to see an Islamic system of government installed in Pakistan. They reject the Pakistani constitution and the democratic system of government in general.

And to this end they have waged a campaign of terror over the years. Their suicide bombers have killed and maimed tens of thousands of innocent Pakistani civilians. They have attacked military bases destroying aircraft and equipment. Army convoys have been ambushed and bombed.

The Pakistani government and political parties have vacillated on how to deal with the TTP. The question has been: Shall we fight or talk? The latest attempt to arrive at a decision was on September 9, 2013. The main political parties were invited by the Government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for an All Parties Conference in Islamabad. It was broadly agreed to “negotiate” with the TTP.

The TTP’s response came five days later: A roadside bomb killed a respected Pakistani Major General and his aide as they returned from inspecting troops in the Upper Dir District of KPK. Embarrassed, the government vowed tough action. Nothing was done. And a few days later the talk once again turned to a negotiated solution.

In some sense this has been the pattern in which the government has dealt with the TTP

They hold out an olive branch. The TTP commits another atrocity. The government talks tough. And then holds out another olive branch. And the cycle continues.

The current lovefest seems to have made more progress. The government has, for the first time, nominated its negotiating team. And the TTP have nominated theirs. Which, as the farce worthy of Oscar Wilde unfolds, includes Imran Khan, the charismatic leader of the popular political party Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf (Pakistan Justice Movement). It seems unlikely that Mr. Khan’s party will allow him to accept this new honor.

But all of this is not what gives this saga its other world quality.

The real issue is: Should the government be talking at all to terrorists?

And if they do talk what will they say? Do they say that all is forgiven? We forgive you for the tens of thousands of people you have murdered and the millions of dollars of damage that you have caused. Further, we agree to abrogate our constitution, resign our seats in parliament, enact a new constitution based on your version of the Shariah, and invite you to ensconce your “Khalifa” in Islamabad.

The general public is watching all this with somewhat bemused disbelief. They know – as would any objective observer with common sense – that there is no common ground. And they also know that in the end the TTP will have to be defeated on the battleground not the conference room. So why are the politicians reluctant to do what needs to be done?

No one is quite sure about the answer. There are reports that many prominent politicians – especially in the KPK – have cut deals with the TTP. Protection money is being paid so that the politicians can, by staying alive and hence remaining in power, recover their multimillion-dollar expenses incurred in winning the last elections.

And what does Pakistan’s powerful army make of all this? They have not, sensibly, expressed their preferences in public. But it is not hard to imagine that they are rearing to have a go at uprooting their nemesis. And would like nothing better than a clean, unrestricted mandate from the civilian administration to use whatever means necessary to achieve this objective.

The army has proved that it has the ability, will and firepower to extirpate the TTP. The last time they received a clear mandate to do so was in 2009 when the TTP and affiliated groups had occupied the Swat District. Within a few weeks they defeated and evicted the occupiers, enforced the government’s writ and allowed hundreds of thousands of refugees to return to their homes.

But for the time being at least it seems that Pakistanis are going to have to wait and see the outcome of the government’s “negotiations” with the TTP. And what will be discussed? Lewis Carroll, many years ago, put it best: “The time has come,” the Walrus said, “To talk of many things: Of shoes, and ships, and sealing-wax, of cabbages and kings, and why the sea is boiling hot, and whether pigs have wings.”

Nadeem Qureshi is Chairman at Mustaqbil Pakistan. Nadeem is a graduate of MIT and Harvard Business School, and is fluent in Arabic. Mustaqbil Pakistan is a Pakistani political party which believes that the country’s many problems stem from a single cause: Our politicians in general do not have the sincerity, competence, education and experience to run the country. Mustaqbil Pakistan’s raison d’etre is to provide a platform for the country’s best people to enter and compete in the political arena. You can find him on Google+ and Twitter.Read other articles by Nadeem.

You May Also Enjoy

THANKS FOR VISITING!

Sharnoff’s Global Views features unique and original commentary straight from the people who live it. Launched in 2012, Sharnoff’s Global Views is an independent website and exists solely for its contributors and readers. Your feedback, questions and comments are important. We are listening. Your voice matters. Read more about Sharnoff’s Global Views mission statement here.

Discover Unique Content

Subscribe

Sign up to join our global community and receive latest posts delivered to your email inbox.

Email Address

Latest Videos

About Sharnoff's Global Views

Paulo Casaca, executive director of the South Asia Democratic Forum, has been a MEP from 1999 to 2009 and a Councillor of the Portuguese Permanent Representation from 1996 to 1999.

Professor Mary Getui, chairperson of the National AIDS Control Council in Kenya, explains how her organization helps prevent the transmission of HIV.

Gillian Kennedy, PhD candidate in Middle East Studies at King's College, London, analyzes Egypt's precarious situation after the military toppled the country's first democratically elected president on July 3, 2013.