Read the rest of the thread, my post is in response not to role play dress up, which I believe I made clear enough precedent of this for entertainment
purposes, but to the notion of teaching children about cross dressing / trans gender issues, which some earlier posts were advocating.

if you believe that is OK, then I suppose you are fine with teaching children about BDSM or other such "alternative" lifestyles. Why else would the
scouts teach you how to tie a reef knot.

Any you want to talk about sick minds.

For shame sir

Leave the innocent to their innocence at least a few years. Is the world not messed up enough as it is.

BDSM is an erotic sexual practice. Transgenderism is not. Granted there are a lot of men who cross-dress as a fetish but this is a cartoon aimed at
children; sexuality does not factor into it. If this cartoon were glorifying ANY kind of sexual activity while targeting this young age group your
argument would have merit. But it's not. Its a cartoon about a boy who has a female alter ego who fights crime.

By the way, implying that we're sick minded is just rude. Just because you were born with a mind that matches your body does not mean that you're
better than us.

How many times did Bugs Bunny kiss Elmer Fudd? I doubt this show will even come close to doing that. It just looks like a crazy show with tweaked
out characters like most kids shows these days. It's ironic that the lead character has to sacrifice his 'manhood' to get stronger. I doubt it even
suggests anything at all. There are far more important issues in the world than what kids are watching on TV.

1. the posts in which I was responding to
2, the post to which I responded
3, the post to which I wrote in repsonse.

Basically you have just not read anything, not understood it.

By the use of "us' I can assume you are of a transgender orientation?

Tell me, if you are a man transitioning to a woman, do you like men, or vice versa

Either way, I am not saying you are sick minded. I am saying that those that would teach children (as indicated by some of our esteemed members here
in earlier posts has you cared to read them) as young as 6, about cross dressing (sexual) and transgender (sex reassignment), When they are just
getting used to the fact (in a liveral house) that daddy has a "peepee" and mummy has a back bum and a front bum,

Will you leave them alone and just left them be kids!!!

ETA. I'm going to say this for the final time. I don't give a crap about some cartoon. My son likes to watch strawberry shotcake cartoons, and you
know what, I watch them with him. What I object to is the ever growing need to tech kids about situations that really are adults only.

That is an intersting point. He has to sacrifice his manhood to get stronger.

While this is re-affirming to girls, is it not a symptom of the on-going emasculation of males in western society, which ironically women have started
to bemoan since the growth metrosexuality
Seriously guys, there is a way to suave, sophisticated and a man, without being macho and stupid.

People needs to worry about other stuff!
Transgender, gay..etc.. they are all human beings like us, there Is nothing wrong with then! There Is no problem with this animation, even If it was
about a transgeder boy (and this Is not the case) what Is the problem????!!!! Please!!!!!!!
Now we have NSA internet spy, Turkey, Brazil. .so many things happening.. The topic about Brazil revolution Its on the 3rd page, no one Is saying
nothing about It.. I really don't understand!

I don't know, maybe because this Is affecting life of your fellow human beings?
I'm not saying that we don't need to worry about our children, but he need to give then choice.. I don't think that this animation will make any
boy turns Into a girl

Like every new cartoon, this one is no different, main character fighting crime/monsters/witches/demons/ninjas using some household item with magical
properties, no substance, no debth and no story ark whatsoever.

Kids will grow to be idiots with these.

Just look at the generations:

Old CN Kids - ok
Fox Kids - ok
Transition - ok
New CN and Jetix and Nickelodeon - a bit stupid and somewhat retarded, all want to become stars

Ok, I'm sorry if I did not read your previous comment's, and about the revolutions In the world, you don't need to care about It If you don't want
to, but be sure that this countries will be supportive to north america If some day the north american's need support In a new revolution or any
affair (like the NSA spy network)...

I wasn't sure how to respond to this, so I thought that watching the intro might help. Instead, I only became more confused about the matter of
whether to laugh, cry, yell, or puke. Two things are definitive in my mind after this experience:
First, things are a lot different from the days of Hanna-Barbera Cartoons.
Second, I wouldn't go about endorsing or advocating this towards kids as it blurs the line between men and women which, for obvious reasons, can lead
to complications in relationships.

There is a plethora of reasons for gender differentiation in society. One of which is part of the bygone era to which women were discriminated
against, and they reacted accordingly by expressing themselves in other means. Another is simply because the urge for broader diversity among sentient
beings encouraged the expression of biological differences. Whichever way you approach the topic, it has its reasons for existence, but the way
society responds to the violation thereof can be inappropriate and overemphasized. Express whatsoever should come natural to you subjectively unless
objectively you would rather avoid inducing, prolonging, or exuding the suffering of others. Know that each action has consequences that you can
either accept or avoid the action altogether.

-♠

Postscript: Back to watching Death Note. At least it has a progressive plot, intriguing setting, and diverging character development.

edit on
20-6-2013 by ArrowOfAces because: Added the postscript information after reading more of the posts.

Originally posted by mykingdomforthetruth
I made a post a while ago on ats and the title was THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH GAY CHILDREN and the post was generally about the liberal view that
homosexuality should be exposed to children at a young age arguing they need to grow up knowing that it´s OK to be gay and its a natural choice to
make .. anyway the first couple of posts i received were from fags as they obviously didnt like what i said then the entire thread was removed and i
received a warning for posting what ats deems crap,

this cartoon is just 1 of many things aimed at converting regular children into freaks its plainly obvious to normal humans .

I would bet, homosexual tendencies have existed forever.
What's better, to hide it and pretend it doesn't exist, or deal with it in plain language.
Making this behavior taboo only alienates people who have these feelings and can create a deranged perspective in those who do not. (your language
demonstrates this perfectly)

If you had a son who wanted to play with dolls and pretended to be a little girl, what would you do?
Wouldn't you want this child to grow up in a world where he/she is accepted and loved by everyone?

It starts by admitting this behavior exist and is not going away whether you like it or not. Perhaps you don't like it because you have been taught
not to like or accept it.

If we are are lucky, future generations will not stigmatize those with homosexual tendencies.
I don't think there are people/organizations "out there" who want your children to be gay, but maybe they want your gay child to feel at least
equal to others. I see this as a good thing because as of now, many of those children probably do not find acceptance at home.

What would you teach your feminine boy? Would you call him a freak, or a fag?

edit on 20-6-2013 by tanda7 because: spelling

if my son got a gay friend or felt confused i would make no bones about it, i would probably rent the most gruesome gay porno i could find then make
my son watch it

2 guys eating eachothers # should put him of queers for life

then i would rent a proper descent porno of real beautilful asian women going at it with a dildo or something then i would tell him he can have a
couple of asian women and a car for his 18th birthday if he stays straight and abstains untill then..

what would you do if your son was thinking about playing for the other team ?

lemme guess you would nurture those feelings expressing tolerance reinforcing the idea its ok ?

Oh my Five G's

Good Gosh Get A Grip Girl,

One, it's not a choice, Two there is nothing wrong with being Homosexual, transgender, transvestite, Drag Queen, or anything 'Alternative'

1. the posts in which I was responding to
2, the post to which I responded
3, the post to which I wrote in repsonse.

Well I went back and read your posts, which basically said more of the same. At least I can tell you don't hold some irrational hatred for my
kind, which is cool. My point still stands.

Basically you have just not read anything, not understood it.

By the use of "us' I can assume you are of a transgender orientation?

Tell me, if you are a man transitioning to a woman, do you like men, or vice versa

I could take a jab at your own lack of understanding regarding transgender issues. Or the fact that you probably didn't read my previous post in which
I explained at length my whole gender identity experience.

To sum it up, I'm bigender; I feel both male and female in a male body. I have no desire to undergo sexual reassignment. I'm still uncertain on
hormones but I probably wont.

Bigender falls under the umbrella term, transgender, which also includes transsexuals, genderless, genderfluid...there's a lot of overlapping terms
which all describe slightly different things.

And I'm not sure what my sexual orientation has to do with anything or if its even any of your business but I'll humor you anyway, I like guys and
girls, but I prefer guys. For complicated reasons.

Either way, I am not saying you are sick minded. I am saying that those that would teach children (as indicated by some of our esteemed members here
in earlier posts has you cared to read them) as young as 6, about cross dressing (sexual) and transgender (sex reassignment), When they are just
getting used to the fact (in a liveral house) that daddy has a "peepee" and mummy has a back bum and a front bum,

Will you leave them alone and just left them be kids!!!

But the problem with your statements is that transgenderism is not an exclusively adult issue...there are a fair number of children who are confused
about their gender from a very young age and don't understand why they feel this way.

I'm not saying we need to go into great detail explaining this to children...we don't need to explain the intricacies of hormones and sexual
reassignment surgery. But I think it would be greatly beneficial to introduce topics like this to children early in their education.

We could start off by saying something like "boys and girls have different parts" which is a pretty simple concept to grasp; my little 4 year old
half-sister knows about penises and vaginas because my step-mom has a 2 year old son and has to change his diaper while watching her. Then tell the
kids that boys and girls usually like different things, but some boys like girl stuff and some girls like boy stuff, everybody's different; wow thats
another simple concept that kids figure out in kindergarten. Okay take that a step further, some boys feel like girls and some girls feel like boys.
And that's okay. And you can stop there because sexual orientation won't matter to those kids for many years, you can save that for sex ed class.

If letting kids be kids means leaving kids completely ignorant of gender identity so that when a girly boy comes along and gets the crap kicked out of
him by bigger boys and called a sissy and made to hate his life, just because he's different...well, I think that is sick minded.

(added) I think we should be teaching children about non-binary gender...stop stuffing children into rigid little boxes, let them be
themselves!

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.