See http://joumxyzptlk.de/panoramas.html. Even if more panoramas are added in the future, that landing page will stay. The most of them are between 100 and 300 megapixel, not every games has enough detail to make them bigger.

Nice!I've made panoramas from games too: Skyrim, Star Trek Online, Star Wars: the Old Republic. I'm too screenshot-happy to not try, so now I'm looking for new games to play around with.With STO I encountered the same problem you did, the camera is always off to the side of the character, so there are some stitching errors still. =/

I actually got really good shots of SW:TOR, and managed to make a few Livepanos with some! Unfortunately I don't have a website..

Lmih wrote:Nice!I've made panoramas from games too: Skyrim, Star Trek Online, Star Wars: the Old Republic. I'm too screenshot-happy to not try, so now I'm looking for new games to play around with.With STO I encountered the same problem you did, the camera is always off to the side of the character, so there are some stitching errors still. =/

I actually got really good shots of SW:TOR, and managed to make a few Livepanos with some! Unfortunately I don't have a website..

Well, I started the site in 2013, when Futuremark marketing contacted me whether I could place my 6K/60 fps videos from 3DMark 2013 on a place with a better connection than Skydrive. But I create game panos since 2010, and normal panos long before. So keep on doing those panoramas, and do a website whenever you want *g*.

Joachim Otahal wrote:See http://joumxyzptlk.de/panoramas.html. Even if more panoramas are added in the future, that landing page will stay. The most of them are between 100 and 300 megapixel, not every games has enough detail to make them bigger.

Hi!

Funny - what´s the reason that most of those sites look like designed in the ´80s?

Joachim Otahal wrote:See http://joumxyzptlk.de/panoramas.html. Even if more panoramas are added in the future, that landing page will stay. The most of them are between 100 and 300 megapixel, not every games has enough detail to make them bigger.

Hi!

Funny - what´s the reason that most of those sites look like designed in the ´80s?

best, Klaus

The 90's I'd say, there was no web until 1993.Reason is simple: I did my previous homepage in 1996, and then again in 2013 since I saw no reason to create one.typo3/joomla/etc/etc were all not usable due to my several > 10 gigabytes of Ultra HD or 6K HD videos which you cannot upload with a web tool. And you cannot easily add already uploaded files to those web-helper tools.So I had do do it by hand. But I also have a job, so the time is limited.Switching to a different style will come some day, but that is not priority since CSS is a really f.ed up bad designed standard, so I currently use it for basic style.This gif shows pretty nice how annoying CSS can be when trying to get my that simple style going:

Joachim Otahal wrote:See http://joumxyzptlk.de/panoramas.html. Even if more panoramas are added in the future, that landing page will stay. The most of them are between 100 and 300 megapixel, not every games has enough detail to make them bigger.

Hi!

Funny - what´s the reason that most of those sites look like designed in the ´80s?

best, Klaus

The 90's I'd say, there was no web until 1993.Reason is simple: I did my previous homepage in 1996, and then again in 2013 since I saw no reason to create one.typo3/joomla/etc/etc were all not usable due to my several > 10 gigabytes of Ultra HD or 6K HD videos which you cannot upload with a web tool. And you cannot easily add already uploaded files to those web-helper tools.So I had do do it by hand. But I also have a job, so the time is limited.Switching to a different style will come some day, but that is not priority since CSS is a really f.ed up bad designed standard, so I currently use it for basic style.This gif shows pretty nice how annoying CSS can be when trying to get my that simple style going: