"Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops, like bishops, and your religious act like religious." - Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, 1972

Thursday, September 15, 2016

NEOCATECHUMENAL SPEECH: "DOUBLE VICTIMIZATION" OF VICTIMS.

Posted by LaPaz, Jungle Watch Correspondent from Spain,

Diana's neocatechumenal reaction about Mr. De Plata reminds me nazi's attitude and mentality. As all of us know, they defended the superiority of some, the strongest, the fittest, over the weakness and less adapted ones.

Feeling oneself as being always better than anyone was not a nazi's invention, of course. The belief of being the best just based on non eligible human characteristics was not also introduced by them in human History.

The greatest sin of nazi's was to desing a whole State as a perfect machine in the service of Death, which requires extreme investment of Evil in many synchronized fields. They inoculated moral anesthesia in millions of common citizens. They cultivated a genuine Culture of Death. Their goal: to establish the kingdom of the super human, the Arian.

We know they killed children, women, old, disabled, sick...they killed jewish, comunist, homosexual...even catholic people, because they were systematically annihilating every human creature who did not fit in their schemes of excellence. They were god and decided who can live and who do not deserve it. Left or right.

Kiko has sold his Symphony of the Suffering trying to seem very emphatic with jewish victims of nazi's. Kiko is creating a new kind of faithful people, they feel as the super-Christians, superior over the Sunday Mass' belivers. He blames the "natural religiosity" of many catholics at the same time he applies his peculiar rules of natural selection within Church. The kingdom of the fittest, it is, of the better able to adapt to the new requirements of a new faith for a new evangelization.

Kiko has trained his troops of super-Christians to belive neocatechumenals are the best always and for everything. They are the most opened to life in their marriages, they are the extra-sized families, they have the world record in Cesarean deliveries, they have the highest number of seminaries for priest, they have the greatest knowledge in theology, liturgy, patristics...They are those who sing loudest, who evangelize "citius, altius, fortius" (faster, higher, stronger)...and blahblahblahblah more and more.

As well, they are the best even competing in the worst. Their marriages were the most disaster and destroyed, their sins were the most horrible, they were the most terrible rapers, drugaddicts, violent, killers...the real most garbage of the world. You know, always at least two meters above the other, in the good and in the bad, in health and disease, forever and ever.

Kiko seems to feel tons of pain with inocent jewish sufferings, but he has no mercy with the weakness of his own catholic brothers and sisters. These are too human. He needs super-human. Being the worst sinner is not a problem for him, since the worst have a main place in his NCW. A different thing is being "a weak". Kiko vomits them.

Remember I told you in the NCW you can not have an asmathic son because it means you are a neurotic mother. You can not be a loving parent because your son will be a homosexual. You can not have a health insurance because you prevent God's providence. And again more blahblahblah with the new neocatechumenal Levitical with thousand of invented rules.

In Spanish we use to say "quien hace la ley, hace la trampa", which means "the one who makes the law also makes the trap" (of course Kiko and his neocatechumenals know how to make the trap, but this is for another post). In theory, he requires the best and the most by his followers.

Sooner or later, being a neocatechumenal, such a super-marvel faithful, affects all spheres of your private and public life. It is quite common to hear that neocatechumenals are "fanatics, extremists and fundamentalists". Yes, they are. Those are consubstantial consequences. If you are told to be such an elite among catholics and trained to be superior, you will be an elitist. You won't be a sister of mercy with others.

If you are trained to think you are a shit, then everybody will be the same: a simple shit (sorry). If your most loved teacher in faith, your catechist, treats you as such, the greatest shit you will be and you will want to be. They confuse humilty with iniquity. They allow themselves being merciless because for them it shows better how not to be dependant on affections. They interpret affection with adulation and with Devil.

They forget in that way they also show how they feel the love of God. Kiko always says he rejects the wrong idea of God with a bat to punish you, sinner. But at the end, he inculcates the same idea but with a little hue: God sends your suffering because you deserve, it is for your conversion.

It means, God is source of evil, a great contradiction and a grave heresy. God sends you a cancer, God sends your son's dead, your violent husband, etc. etc.

Neocatechumenals are not a model of compassion at all. Compassion is such a weakness. If God does not show compassion with them, they will not show compassion with others. It is pure logic. The most important mission they have with you is to announce God loves you in your cancer and what does your cancer mean for you from God.

If you ask them for help, the only help they will give you is their testimony in the NCW and of course an invitation for the Inicial Catechesis. Oh, I forgot to say they will tell you they are going to pray for you. They pray a lot. They will never say "go to mass", "look for a priest"...Just prayers and assist to neocatechumenal catechesis to join the Way (that is called proselitysm, isn't it?).

In such environment we find Diana's words about Mr. De Plata testimony about sexual abuses. Diana gets her neocatechumenal toolkit and starts a fratricidal scrutiny.

The so loved catechist, while scrutinizes a poor neocatechumenal, goes making slices into your soul to supposedly iluminate you with God's love.

As in front of the storage room of your life, he wants to remove everything. He will analyze every speck of dust, each spiderweb. He moves by suspicions. It means every little word you say will be used against you.

And it also means your silence will be consider as clue of guilty. If you talk, bad. If you do not talk, worst. It implies you are lost, yes or yes. It will be a buchery.

That is why Diana shows herself so merciless. She pretends she has been iluminated and Mr. De Plata has not (because he is not a neocatechumenal). She talks about him and about the facts he relates as if she was a catechist and Mr. De Plata was a blind neocatechumen.

She looks for shadows and silences, she is trying to find why God would have allowed such things (abuses) happened. Maybe he was looking to be the center? Maybe he was looking for his self realization being an altar boy? Maybe he was or wasn't blahblahblah? Maybe he did or did not blahblahblah? (so until infinity and beyond).

Diana has to give the last word. The definitive word. She has to stay above. Diana, super-wannabe-super-Christian has to offer a meaning for all. The thing is not here is a man who has sexually abused children. The thing is Mr. De Plata has to understand his life under neocatechumenal light.

Here the wrong is not in Apuron's roof but in Mr. De Plata. Apuron surelly had been forgiven by his neocatechumenal community, in case that he had told his brothers and sisters in faith he did those crimes (which I doubt, sincerely). That means Apuron would be free of his guilty, in neocatechumenal terms. He has been forgiven by the assembly.

"Every person who has been hit or abused always cry. Raise a fist against any child or even yell at them and you will see them cowering, crying in tears, or struggle to get away" (Super-Christian Diana)

Diana and neocatechumenals show how human intelligence can be reduced to ashes in the NCW.

Mr. De Plata, the wrong witness. He did not cry.
Why abusers did not choose modelic victims?!?!

Diana, super Diana, do you know about "double victimization" of abused? You should read a few.

I do not know Guam Laws, but I do know any victim should not suffer "double victimization" and you should not be near any victim of any kind of violence. I hope your work is not related with children, in education or taking care of their wellness, moral, mental or physically.

Your comments on Mr. De Plata's testimony should be included at academic programs as an example of double victimization. Please, leave victims living in peace. Do not throw more guilty over their shoulders.

And remember: each time you behave like a naziof the faith showing off how brilliant is your neocatechumenal analisys of facts and people, you are the best anti-catechesis.

Double victimization of victims causes so much pain. Innecessary pain. You have not right to cause more pain to anybody, but less yet to a person who has been destroyed by any kind of abuses.

8 comments:

LaPaz,This post is "boiling".Your pedagogic way to write (like always) opens the mind for those have sill doubts about the poisoning essence of the NCW and helps many souls to take a choice to (re)activate their free will.Thank you for your posts.

If this article does not at least give Diana - aka pius - aka Kiko - something to really think about - then Hell' Door is OPEN WIDE for all Three of You to Walk Through! Thank You LaPaz! You Always Hit the Nail Right on the Head!

Greetings and Hafa Adai Vatican,.Dear Pope Francis, can you feel me from afar? Can you hear me from afar? In spirit can you see me from afar? I will tell you a story that I experienced while attending the Sacrifice of the Holy Mass at my parish Church. .It was time for the sign of peace. I looked across the aisle to the left side of the pew. A woman (alone) kept her head bow down and did not responded to the peace sign. At the time and In the state of grace I could only offer up a prayer for her, and what she is going through for God to help her. And I did. .It was Communion time. I got prepared to pushed my husband (wheelchair user) up to the altar. He requested to line up on the left side to receive Communion from our Priest. As I made our way to the left side of the aisle, I came upon the woman still her head bowed down, I then noticed in front of her a cane on the floor. Immediately, this told me she is blind. I stop? I whispered into her ear that it was Communion time, and would she like to receive. She replied, yes! I told her that I'm pushing my husband in a wheelchair, and for her to hold on to my shoulder and I will walk slower. Dear Pope Francis, It is an honor, a priviledge to bring up to altar both the lame and the blind.. Outside the Church I ran into the woman. I thanked her, and wished her all the best. Again, she thanked me days later. Our conversation extended longer. She spoke about being in the Agana community. At the time I didn't understand what she was talking about nor did I know about the existance of this NCW. She invited me to come. I agreed and that we were going to do sharing with her community our experience during Holy Communion. I was excited to meet her again. When I did, she told me her community did not agree for me to come in so we can share this good news with them, and that a set date, much later, will be appropriate when they open up another community. I had no idea what this meant at the time. Therefore, what we thought was good news to share among brothers and sisters in Christ never had a chance to be told. Am I not good enough for them? Why did their community reject me!

Neocats-STOP THIS? Whoever is behind Diana's block who posted is out to question the work of God, degrading the intergrity of the Donor. Leave the Donor to God, as they gave freely they shall receive freely. You have no business interfering and or insulting the Donor. You people are sick in the head? .Thursday, September 15, 2016Clarifications From NCW CatechistsPosted by Diana at 8:55 AM ."We also know that the benefactor who gave the 2 million dollars did so with the INTENT to establish a seminary. No donor is going to give 2 million dollars without knowing what the 2 million dollars is going to be used for. "

They can produce NO document evidencing any of their claims. In addition to a copy of the donor's note saying only that the donation was to be used for the "purchase of a defunct hotel for the purpose of a seminary," I have a copy of a sworn affidavit saying that in no way was the money given for the purpose of anything having to do with RMS or the NCW. I will present these documents when we go to court.

However, while the donor included a note of intent, the note of intent is NOT binding on the recipient. The note did not say that the hotel itself had to be used as a seminary. The purchase of the "defunct hotel" could just as well have been used to finance the building of a seminary with the proceeds from the sale of the defunct hotel.

Bottom line is NOT one of these neo nurds, Diana, Eusebio, anyone, can produce a single piece of paper backing up any of their claims. Challenge them to do so.