In this issue

White paper leaves egg on the face?

We
should have seen it coming. When the Tomlinson report was published in
the autumn, the heavy hand of Downing Street should have prepared us
for bad news.

What none of us had expected was the curate's egg (some would say dog's breakfast) which best describes the white paper.

The removal of the over-arching diploma is the most serious loss,
but in reality the deficiencies in the white paper go well beyond this
single issue.

The underlying assumption is that there is no problem with academic education or the qualifications associated with it.

There is a serious lack of detail in the white paper which is a real
concern for all. Employers have commented on this, and it should not be
thought that they are happy with the proposals.

While there is a general welcome for the new vocational diplomas, several groups representing management have concern.

Quoted in People Management, Victoria Gill of the CIPD said
she was "disappointed" at the lack of a single diploma for academic and
vocational qualifications. She went on: "This could increase
differentiation between the two and mean that vocational studies will
continue to struggle to gain credibility."

I called the white paper a curate's egg. If it is "good in parts",
which parts? If there is one thoroughly positive aspect to the white
paper it is the section on collaboration.

It is clear to most of us that any effective 14-19 curriculum will
need schools, colleges, training providers and employers to work much
more closely together than they did in the past. The white paper is
very clear about this.

In general terms, where it has adhered to the genuine Tomlinson
proposals, there are nuggets of goodness. Unfortunately, a few tidbits
within a mixture still leave the whole looking like a canine morning
snack.

Don't mourn, organise

What can and should we do about this? In the words of the immortal American Trade Unionist Joe Hill, "Don't mourn, organise!"

I believe that the white paper has so many weaknesses that it cannot
be the final word. Since we know that the election has almost certainly
provoked this mess, let's use this opportunity.

If individual SHA members write to the candidates of all parties in
their area asking them to lay out their position on the white paper and
indicating the unhappiness of education leaders with the abandonment of
Tomlinson, it could have an effect.

Above all, we should back our judgment with action. SHA members may
be unlikely revolutionaries, but we could be very effective. Why not
get together in groups of schools in your own area and talk to the
local FE college about local Level 1 accreditation?

Have you established a good working relationship with your local
LSC? Would they be prepared to sponsor Tomlinson-style diplomas at all
levels? This is already happening in Tamworth in Staffordshire, where
every student who gained the appropriate GCSEs was given a locally
generated Level 1 certificate last year.

One of the alleged reasons for the failure to accept Tomlinson was
the opposition of the CBI. I suspect that many employers in your area
will not have contributed to this view, and will be confused by the
government's decision.

Business links

A senior team member might offer to brief local Chamber of Commerce
meetings about the inadequacies of the white paper proposals, and the
ways in which collaboration with employers might be improved.

Another place to flex your muscles is with QCA and the examining
boards. SHA members are often in prominent positions in the advisory
boards of these organisations, and would be able to raise continuing
concerns about the failure to reform assessment.

Remember the effect Cato's constant repetition of "Delenda est Carthago" had on the fate of Rome's chief Mediterranean rival.

Perhaps SHA members could insert the phrase, "the assessment burden
must be reduced," into every speech they make in appropriate
gatherings. This should also be a matter that WAMG puts at the top of
its priority list, and SHA members are in a position to make this
happen.

Above all, SHA members need to act together. Remember the words of
Benjamin Franklin to John Hancock at the signing of the Declaration of
Independence: "We must indeed all hang together, or, most assuredly, we
shall all hang separately."

By David Johnson, Director of Learning at Chase Collegiate in Staffordshire