Still waiting for the day when we can argue foul calls/no-calls and get realistic techs and flagrants all around, instead of a few random ones from swearing at Kinect (or calling a time-out and having it register as a bad word).

Still waiting for the day when we can argue foul calls/no-calls and get realistic techs and flagrants all around, instead of a few random ones from swearing at Kinect (or calling a time-out and having it register as a bad word).

Still waiting for the day when we can argue foul calls/no-calls and get realistic techs and flagrants all around, instead of a few random ones from swearing at Kinect (or calling a time-out and having it register as a bad word).

I would definitely love that. You talking about taking realism to the next level. Imagine if they had different referees with different personalities. They could have a veteran official likely to cave in to the pressure and start showing more leeway to the person that did the arguing. Or a veteran official that is quick to call technicals or who is upset at being challenged and starts calling the game even tighter against who was arguing. Tie that in with individual player personalities and that could be sick.

I would definitely love that. You talking about taking realism to the next level. Imagine if they had different referees with different personalities. They could have a veteran official likely to cave in to the pressure and start showing more leeway to the person that did the arguing. Or a veteran official that is quick to call technicals or who is upset at being challenged and starts calling the game even tighter against who was arguing. Tie that in with individual player personalities and that could be sick.

MLB The Show has something like that where there are different umps each game and all of them call things different, especially the behind the plate ump. Each game the strike zone is different.

I would definitely love that. You talking about taking realism to the next level. Imagine if they had different referees with different personalities. They could have a veteran official likely to cave in to the pressure and start showing more leeway to the person that did the arguing. Or a veteran official that is quick to call technicals or who is upset at being challenged and starts calling the game even tighter against who was arguing. Tie that in with individual player personalities and that could be sick.

This is something I've always wanted to see. Not just from a personality standpoint but also with how they call a game; whether quick with the whistle, or allowing guys to play through contact. Ref tendencies/profiles could moderate that.

They should make a meter. The meter indicates the calls in your favor. You could increase/decrease it by arguing. But doing this to much could result in a technical or ejection or even increasing the calls against you for the other team.

This is something I've always wanted to see. Not just from a personality standpoint but also with how they call a game; whether quick with the whistle, or allowing guys to play through contact. Ref tendencies/profiles could moderate that.

fifa 14 has that too. they've got like 40+ refs that will call the game their own way (some are more lenient with regular fouls while some are super harsh with anything). they're not all unique but a lot are

I thought you're talking about getting TECH for trash talking on the mic...but getting tech while calling timeout when you have none is not cool. I would think it's going to annoy some people. What IS the point of putting that in the game anyway.

They're fine. I actually prefer an always connected experience.
I'd really prefer an offline way to play, but its not a bother.
I don't really like them, and am more reluctant to buy a game because of it.
I won't buy them. I want my games offline.