Category: Immigration

I enjoy picking on cuckservatives because it is so easy to wrap them up in logical contradictions. When discussing politics with a cuck I often hear responses like, “All we need to do is follow the constitution.” Perhaps the cuck will say, “We should have a free market for health care.” Statements like this ignore the simple political reality that there must be some WE which agrees with this point of view.

When discussing Hans Herman Hoppe’s work on the Daily Shoa, Curt Doolittle mentioned that a fundamental question of ethics is, “Why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?” Such a statement might seem silly at first, but consider the origins of law. A law proceeds from a gentleman’s agreement, and law is enforced with various physical punishment. When two cave men met a few thousand years ago, you can bet that each of them thought, “I can kill this guy and take his stuff.” At some point, they learned not to kill each other and law was born.

A high trust society is possible because of a system in which no one, not even the King, is above the law. Cucks simply take this high trust framework for granted. Visiting rural Baja California is an interesting experience. Far from major towns enterprising fellows sell gasoline in plastic milk jugs. What a great free market system! What octane rating is it? Has it been diluted with wood alcohol? The transaction takes place far from the law, and it is buyer beware. Much of the world economy consists of this style of bazaar economics in which haggling is expected, quality is questionable, and transparency is completely absent.

Transparency in politics is damaged when one side refuses to play by the rules. Conservatives tolerated the gay marriage initiative because they thought, “Live and let live.” A conservative could justify a pro-gay marriage position based upon libertarian principles. Such a cuck should not be too surprised then when the other side, which proclaimed a desire to live and let live, then asserts a right to be married at the cuck’s church. The situation is analogous to the buyer who agrees to buy a quart of milk only to discover that it is diluted with cat piss.

The first three words of the constitution are “We the People.” What happens when there is no longer a we? Judicial activism is a glaring example of this. A law may clearly state that freed men of color may be citizens, but a judge comes to power and simply declares that this means that any baby born on US soil is a citizen. There is no longer a we in most of the west. A high trust society no longer exists when various factions decide that they are above the law and act to work around the law with any bit of power that they can acquire.

Black’s will vote for more social programs by a 90% margin. There is no argument based upon law that will convince them otherwise. A black person who gains power, whether in business or government, will typically act in his own interest and act to subvert the law. Waves of immigrants are flooding to the west at this moment. These people do not consider themselves to be part of the we. The immigrants will often be from parts of the world where the low trust bazaar economy is typical. The end result will be a low trust political system.

A question often debated in white nationalist circles is, “Are Jewish people white?” The question seems absurd when asked about European Jews since they are from Europe. The real question which should be asked of any person, or any ethnicity is, “Are you part of the we?” In the case of Jews, a large percentage consider themselves to be a minority apart from the rest of society. These Jews caused a disruption to the system of law and trust in the west as they gained power in the 1950’ and 1960’s. Liberals have always been around in the west. The American Board of Massachusetts was a religious organization which sought to school the Indians and otherwise improve their quality of life in the early 1800’s. The abolitionist movement was certainly one of the left wing movements of its time, but the abolitionists sought to make changes to the law. The temperance movement of the twentieth century also came from a Puritan background, but they also sought changes in law. The temperance movement, and the female suffrage movement, were both successful in making legal changes to the constitution.

What has changed since the 1960’s is that the left learned that they can gain power through media, academia, and the arts. This power is then used to subvert the law rather than change it. No constitutional changes were made to allow tranny bathrooms. A system has been put in place where political goods are offered for sale in the marketplace. (Propaganda in the media) Few of these goods are advertised truthfully. The cucks need to get it through their thick skulls that the constitution and law in general do not matter. Law is based upon the agreement to honor it. When one side agrees to honor the law while another side’s mentality is, “I want to take your stuff”, the law is rendered impotent.

Considering all of the above it is possible to answer the question, “Are Jews white?” The answer is maybe. A Jew is white if he chooses to think of himself as white. Does he consider himself part of the we? For many Jews the answer may be no.

Donald Trump may have a master plan for saving the country, or he may not. Phase 1 of Trump’s plan will be to consolidate power. His best course of action will be to emulate Ronald Reagan’s fiscal irresponsibility. While some remember Reagan as a great conservative, federal deficits soared to unprecedented levels under his administration. Reagan had two primary goals and he achieved them both. His first goal was to lower all marginal tax rates and simplify the tax code. His other goal was to rebuild the US military. Reagan seldom had full congressional support for these measures, and the media fought him every step of the way. To overcome congressional opposition Reagan simply bought cooperation with deficit spending. Congressmen may make noise about balanced budgets, but they all love to spend money on their constituents. Reagan’s deficits were strategic. He ensured cooperation with the parts of his program that mattered to him, and he felt that economic growth would make all the spending irrelevant overall. Things did not work out quite so rosy, but the Soviet Union did come apart.

Donald Trump is no Regan, but he may elect to use a similar strategy. Trump does not care so much about abortion, tax policy, or military spending as many so-called conservatives. Trump’s main issues seem to be border security, and favorable trade deals. Neither of these issues are popular with congress, and the media hates the idea of an America first policy. This does not matter to Trump—he will buy cooperation. Already there are rumors of a massive infrastructure spending bill in his first 100 days. This bill will do very little to put Americans to work. Public works projects just do not employ many people compared to the old days, and projects take forever to leave the planning stage. All this spending will buy cooperation from key members of congress who are eager to reward their friends with a big pork dinner. Trump will also use military spending and tax cuts to buy cooperation. These measures will be fiscally irresponsible in the extreme, and will place stress on an already shaky financial system. Trump will not care.

Trump will use all the cooperation that he buys to build a real border wall. He will also act to create what amounts to a security state favorable to most Americans. Deportations of illegals will begin and this step is critical to the overall plan. Trump will also seek to delegitimatize the media, and weaken their power. His judicial appointments will also help to secure his power for the next important phase. He will seek to obtain a great relationship with the FBI and military. He will build friendships with state and local law enforcement. When he senses that the time is right, Trump will collapse the system.

The idea that Trump will use spending to build cooperation should not be controversial. Whether Trump intends to cause or allow an economic collapse is highly speculative. (Larping) Consider that Donald Trump is no stranger to bankruptcy. He has used bankruptcy to successfully defend and rebuild his business empire. Trump does not share the same sky is falling, woe is me, the world is ending, attitude about business failure that is common in the media. Donald Trump is likely to use the economic collapse to save the county. Bankruptcy is beautiful and deflation is divine.

People who are what Rush Limbaugh calls low information voters think of rich people as if they had huge vaults full of money, when the truly rich are considered to be rich because of the market value of their assets. This market value fluctuates, and many of the wealthiest people in the world also hold a great deal of debt. As long as their assets can generate enough revenue to keep paying on the debt these people and institutions remain rich. As soon as the checks start to bounce, an entire empire can come to its knees quickly.

Consider the case of an Iowa corn farmer who owns 1000 acres of prime farmland free and clear. If the land is worth $8000 per acre, this farmer holds 8 million worth of land, and perhaps has another $100,000 or so in the bank. If the price of corn and the price of land collapse so that his farms are only worth $500,000 instead of 8 million he really does not care. This farmer, who may lead a very middle class lifestyle, has simply moved sideways down the asset deflation bubble as it pops.

A corporate farm may also own 1000 acres, but the land will almost certainly be paid for with borrowed money. In a major economic downturn, the corporate farm is instantly bankrupt and those 1000 acres will be offered for sale by the court at a fire sale price. The popping of the asset inflation bubble will be painful for many people in addition to all the large corporations, but the end result will be affordable family formation and a healthy society.

Asset inflation has been one of the most destructive forces damaging American families, and it has been tolerated since the 1970’s. The price of a house in a non-inflated economy will remain fairly stable, but housing prices in the USA have been steadily rising. While homeowners typically see this as a good thing and have been known to consider their houses as speculative investments, rising asset prices kill the middle class. Health care, education, transportation, and food have all been inflated to absurd levels. When section 8 housing vouchers pay for a $1000 per month apartment, a middle-class family needs to spend $1500 per month to stay in a nice area. White people choose not to have kids. Society gradually degrades.

While Trump is a wealthy man, he has middle class sensibilities. Lion of the Blogosphere has observed that Trump has 1950’s values. Since Trump understands the real estate market as well as anyone, he will not be intimidated into another TARP. The big banks will fall. Asset prices will fall, but those assets will become productive once more since the cost of operating farms, factories, and stores will be so much more reasonable. America will be much stronger and better post collapse. The key to making all this happen is for Trump to have very strong political control of law enforcement, the judiciary, and the military. Even if the dollar collapses a new currency, perhaps based on gold, could be created. Instead of bailing out the big banks, Trump may choose to bail out the holders of CDs, checking accounts, small businesses, and farms. These people, who may see the prices of their houses fall by 50% or more will suddenly feel rich. These people will rebuild the country.