On Tuesday, as the UN's global drug prohibition bureaucracy marked its annual International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking and UN Office on Drugs and Crime head Yuri Fedotov blamed hard drug use for "bringing misery to thousands of people, insecurity, and the spread of HIV," a group of leading international voices offered a starkly contrasting perspective, arguing instead that is the failures and consequences of global drug prohibition that are driving the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne diseases among drug users.

Commission members Michel Kazatchkine, Ruth Dreifuss, and Ilana Szabo at London press conference

There are an estimated 33 million people worldwide infected with HIV, and outside sub-Saharan Africa, injection drug use accounts for one-third of new infections. The situation is particularly bad in Russia and other countries in the former Soviet Union and East Bloc that continue to take harsh drug war approaches to drug use despite the evidence before their own eyes. In Russia, nearly one in a hundred adults is now infected with HIV.

But it's not just the Russian sphere where policymakers ignore the evidence. The report also cites China, Thailand, and the US, where Congress recently reinstated a longstanding ban on the use of federal funds for syringe exchange programs. In countries that have adopted evidence-based HIV prevention programs, such as Switzerland and Portugal, injection drug use-related HIV infections have nearly been eliminated.

According to the report, drug prohibition and the criminalization of drug users spurs the spread of HIV through the following means:

Fear of arrest drives persons who use drugs underground, away from HIV testing and HIV prevention services and into high-risk environments.

Restrictions on provision of sterile syringes to drug users result in increased syringe sharing.

Prohibitions or restrictions on opioid substitution therapy and other evidence-based treatment result in untreated addiction and avoidable HIV risk behavior.

Deficient conditions and lack of HIV prevention measures in prison lead to HIV outbreaks among incarcerated drug users.

Limited public funds are wasted on harmful and ineffective drug law enforcement efforts instead of being invested in proven HIV prevention strategies.

"The Global Commission is calling on all entities to acknowledge and address the causal links between the war on drugs' criminalization of drug use and drug users and the spread of HIV/AIDS," commission member Michel Kazatchkine, the former executive director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria told a London press conference. "For people who inject drugs and their sex partners, the AIDS epidemic continues to be a public health emergency."

"It is so clear now that there is a relation between repressive drug policies and the spread of HIV/AIDS," said former Colombian President Cesar Gaviria. "If we don't get people into the health system without fear, it will be very difficult to do treatment and prevention."

"I have long thought the war on drugs did more harm than good, and the commission's report put the data behind those beliefs," said Branson. "The war on drugs is not stopping drug use, and it also contributes significantly to the AIDS epidemic by driving users into the shadows. As an entrepreneur, if my business was failing for 40 years, I would close it down. Refusing to implement public health measures to reduce HIV and protect people with a drug problem is nothing short of criminal."

Branson and the other commissioners made some concrete recommendations for action in the report. Those include:

Push national governments to halt the practice of arresting and imprisoning people who use drugs but do no harm to others.

Respond to the fact that HIV risk behavior resulting from repressive drug control policies and under-funding of evidence-based approaches is the main issue driving the HIV epidemic in many regions of the world.

Act urgently: The war on drugs has failed, and millions of new HIV infections and AIDS deaths can be averted if action is taken now.

"The AIDS epidemic is a harsh and brutal teacher that obliges us to take a scientific approach to deal with sex workers and drug addicts," said former Swiss President and commission member Ruth Dreifuss. "Politicians have to inform citizens of the benefits, risks, and failures of drug policy, and politics has to take responsibility for policy change. Public health has to be at least as important as criminalizing the drug traffic," she told the press conference.

"Addicted injecting drug users is one of the main sources of the spread, and not all of them will achieve abstinence," said Dreifuss. "Substitution therapies can take people away from street drug dealers and violence. For some, the provision of medical heroin is necessary to allow them to abandon criminal activities and overcome marginalization. It's possible to implement these large scale programs at low costs with high benefits," she argued.

"For others, harm reduction measures are necessary in order to avoid the spread of HIV/AIDS and other bloodborne disease. Needle exchange programs, free condoms, safe consumption rooms all not only save the lives of drug users but protect the whole population," Dreifuss explained. "We need the full spectrum of these measures for those in prison, too, who are at more risk for HIV infections."

Dreifuss touted her own country's experience as a model. Faced with mounting injection drug use, Switzerland eventually went the route of supervised injection sites and opioid maintenance, including heroin maintenance.

"Our experience is that it works," she said. "The police protect the injection rooms from dealers. The four pillar policy [prevention, treatment, harm reduction, enforcement] has been broadly accepted by our citizens and the spread of HIV/AIDS is under control."

Even within the constraints imposed by the global drug prohibition regime, countries can still take action to mitigate the drug war's role in the spread of infectious disease, she said.

"It is possible for countries to adopt effective harm reduction measures within existing drug laws," Dreifuss argued. "The decriminalization of drug use is the first step, and the second step is to determine what type of market can drive out dealers. The war on drugs has failed to reduce supply or demand; let us replace prohibition with regulation and avoid jeopardizing public health and harm reduction policies with inefficient measures."

"Our message is that prohibitionist law enforcement has failed in its goals of eradicating drugs and protecting people's health," said Kazatchkine. "Illegal drugs have become cheaper and more available and HIV and other health risks have increased. Prohibitionist policies have been shifting the market to stronger drugs and led to a war on users with numerous human rights abuses, police harassment, violence, extortion. The fear of police and stigma is driving users underground and away from access to information, care, and medical services," he warned.

"One cannot improve health through war," he concluded. "This is an epidemic among people who inject that we can actually control. If we are to have a chance at reducing the transmission of AIDS, we need to open up and change our ways."

The Global Commission on Drugs has laid out the problem and showed us the path to fix it. Now, it is up to our political leadership to act accordingly, and it is up to us to ensure that it does.

The cia ain`t having it . Look at Afghanistan . Opium production has gone thru the roof ever since the " americans " arrived . Drug prohibition has never been about right or wrong . It`s all about the $$$ and control at the government level .

prohibition causes the spread of stds. no question about it. i know because i am an example of it. sorry but its true and sorry but the circumstances around my contracting these health issues are absolutely because of prohibition and im not gonna go into details and i would gladly do it again to do heroin and id gladly sign a release each bang that says you may get aids/hep c/etc. from banging this sweet heroin. thats ok. but i didnt sign a release and its not supposed to be this way. i guarantee you i and many others, many friends, dead and alive suffering from prohibition, are only infected because of prohibition. in my personal case i promise you that if prohibition of heroin were not in place i would not have stds. nope. i just wouldnt. so sorry.

Thank You for coming forward and saying this here. I am delighted this report came out this week: it gives us strength and hope that this damned drug war, which has substantially contributed to the deaths of our loved ones will soon be over. (My life partner died from AIDS 1995 and I have lost count of other friends since then...)

Honest to God: you'd think that right now with the crashing of economies all over the world - you'd think that right now would be a PERFECTLY Brilliant time to STOP wasting Billions up keeping the drugs war hah? But as Kickback says, this thing's not rational or honest or Just in any way (Did i just put words in Kickback's mouth?!)

Btw It's True... Please never apologize for telling truths

Shame on Russia, Thailand, and so forth for condemning so many of their fellow citizens to live with a so-easily-preventable condition like AIDS. Shame on them, but hey Just For Today, could we just focus on the good here...? Many of us in the drug user movement around the world are ecstatic this week that so many high profile people are supporting our calls for universal needle exchange, Medically Assisted Treatments (MATs) for those dependent drugs users who need them and other compassionate and pragmatic interventions that do NOT violate our Human Rights. Indeed, some of us are even surprised at the level of radical that this Report goes to...Happy Day;-)

Who knows, by the time my kid reaches her teens we may be saying goodbye finally to this archaic brutal war that has taken so much from us

Prescription drugs are obviously a huge problem in our country, and especially in Kentucky, a state which borders my own. But there is an interesting overlap in the comparison of drug deaths to auto accident deaths: Many fatal car accidents are actually caused by drugged driving. Way back in 2009, a NHTSA study found that, among fatally injured drivers, 18 percent tested positive for at least one drug (illicit, prescription, or over-the-counter). So as the numbers of prescription drug abusers go up, so will the number of fatal car accidents. Mary J.