ok, so no night kill. Either there was no kill to make, someone was protected, or someone was roleblocked. I posit the middle scenario most plausible of those three, but also conceivable a recruit took place of a kill. Digging SDD's vagueness in the writeup - will make us think.

relantel wrote:ok, so no night kill. Either there was no kill to make, someone was protected, or someone was roleblocked. I posit the middle scenario most plausible of those three, but also conceivable a recruit took place of a kill. Digging SDD's vagueness in the writeup - will make us think.

relantel wrote:ok, so no night kill. Either there was no kill to make, someone was protected, or someone was roleblocked. I posit the middle scenario most plausible of those three, but also conceivable a recruit took place of a kill. Digging SDD's vagueness in the writeup - will make us think.

the lesson, canaan, is not to repeat the mistakes of the last game and assume anything, and consider all possible reasons. SDD's write-up could be read as infering there was a kill, protection that prevented said kill, and a recruit. Which ought to suggest a vig role is back in this game.