It’s good news for the president: Although no serious Republican primary challenger has emerged, it’s one less speed bump as he attempts to win re-election and stay in the White House for another four years.

But not everyone is happy. Liberals and even some conservatives are crying foul, claiming that Trump is bullying the party.

Advertisement - story continues below

“Trump and his allies and the Republican National Committee are doing whatever they can do to eliminate primaries in certain states and make it very difficult for primary challengers to get on the ballot in a number of states,” former Rep. Joe Walsh, a Republican from Illinois who is running against the president, told Politico.

“It’s wrong, the RNC should be ashamed of itself, and I think it does show that Trump is afraid of a serious primary challenge because he knows his support is very soft,” Walsh said.

Are GOP primaries unnecessary in 2020?

YesNo

Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.

85% (719 Votes)

15% (131 Votes)

However, it must be noted that the Illinois Republican is considered a long-shot candidate at best.

Although he has fringe support, nearly every analysis shows that Walsh would only be a distraction — and to Walsh’s chagrin, Trump’s Republican support is far from “soft.”

Democrats have done the exact same thing many times when they had an incumbent candidate, making complaints that the decision is undemocratic seem rather silly.

“Arizona … did not hold a Democratic presidential primary in 2012, when Barack Obama was seeking a second term, or in 1996, when Bill Clinton was running for reelection,” Politico reported.

Advertisement - story continues below

“Kansas did not have a Democratic primary in 1996, and Republican officials in the state pointed out that they have long chosen to forgo primaries during a sitting incumbent’s reelection year,” the outlet continued.

It’s the same story with two of the most famous GOP presidents of the modern era.

“South Carolina … decided not to hold Republican presidential primaries in 1984, when Ronald Reagan was running for reelection, or in 2004, when George W. Bush was seeking a second term,” Politico added.

In other words, the hand-wringing by the few conservatives who are not onboard with Trump’s re-election seems a bit overwrought.

Advertisement - story continues below

“As a general rule, when either party has an incumbent president in the White House, there’s no rationale to hold a primary,” South Carolina GOP Chairman Drew McKissick said.

Make no mistake, the 2020 election is far from over.

A lot can happen between now and Election Day, and it may prove to be a close race.

But with state Republican parties acknowledging that Trump will be their nominee, the president can focus all his energy on defeating whichever liberal ends up on the ballot.

Benjamin Arie is an independent journalist and writer. He has personally covered everything ranging from local crime to the U.S. president as a reporter in Michigan, before focusing on national politics. Ben frequently travels to Latin America and has spent years living in Mexico.
Follow Benjamin on Facebook

Benjamin Arie has been a political junkie since the hotly contested 2000 election. Ben settled on journalism after realizing he could get paid to rant. He cut his teeth on car accidents and house fires as a small-town reporter in Michigan before becoming a full-time political writer.