The California Senate is considering an override of brown's veto of all the gun bills, on the agenda for Monday! http://senate.ca.gov/calendar Other highlights include
S.B. No. 299-DeSaulnier
S.B. No. 475-Leno
S.B. No. 567-Jackson
S.B. No. 755-Wolk

Unless something has majorly changed they don't have the votes. Never know though.

I don't think so either.
But lets say your a legislator, and you vote to overide Brown, embarass him, a Governor of your own party, would you expect that Brown would support any bills you wrote? Seems like a stupid move.

__________________

"Yeah, like... well, I just want to slap a hippie or two. Maybe even make them get jobs."

The California Senate is considering an override of brown's veto of all the gun bills, on the agenda for Monday! http://senate.ca.gov/calendar Other highlights include
S.B. No. 299-DeSaulnier
S.B. No. 475-Leno
S.B. No. 567-Jackson
S.B. No. 755-Wolk

It's okay for people to go ahead and read the actual information and status of ca.gov laws. It comes up for the potential hearing if the legislature feels it should go into effect notwithstanding the governor's objection. Given the folks that CA put into the legislature, veto overrides are possible and will have a higher probability However, it seems that no action has been pursued.

I wouldn't worry about SB374; there's plenty of other shenanigans on the federal, state, and local level to be concerned with. The 2014 elections will also important--let's hope people choose wisely this time.

I don't think so either.
But lets say your a legislator, and you vote to overide Brown, embarass him, a Governor of your own party, would you expect that Brown would support any bills you wrote? Seems like a stupid move.

Not to mention it makes your own party's frontrunning gubenatorial candidate look like a schmuck... and Brown is likely to run for re-election.

__________________Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.

Miranda vs. Arizona

The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes...

I think we are free of the more draconian bills for this year. Because its an election year they will try to stay more on the mild side. It will come up in a non election year like 2015. We will have .30 caliber clip laws this year. Capable of firing 30 bullets in half a second.

__________________to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

I think we are free of the more draconian bills for this year. Because its an election year they will try to stay more on the mild side. It will come up in a non election year like 2015. We will have .30 caliber clip laws this year. Capable of firing 30 bullets in half a second.

"Democracy" can become the majority trampling an the rights of the minority. The US is a Republic for a reason. The peoples republic of CA is at best a democracy. Sad to see how far this once great state has fallen.

The California Senate is considering an override of brown's veto of all the gun bills, on the agenda for Monday! http://senate.ca.gov/calendar Other highlights include
S.B. No. 299-DeSaulnier
S.B. No. 475-Leno
S.B. No. 567-Jackson
S.B. No. 755-Wolk

Last years Vetoed Bills are dead. The opportunity for a veto override died last year.

That's not true. The legislature adjourned last year on September 13 and did not reconvene until January 6. Thus, it would have been impossible for them to override the vetoes last year. Right now is the first opportunity.

That said, it isn't happening. Vetoes are rarely overridden, especially vetoes by a Governor of the same party. Also recall that SB 374 barely passed both houses last year. There is not near enough support for a two-thirds majority.

__________________DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is general in nature, which may not apply to particular factual or legal circumstances, and is intended for informational purposes only. Consistent with Calguns policy, the information does not constitute legal advice or opinions and should not be relied upon as such. Transmission of the information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon any information in my posts without seeking professional counsel.