Obama to Usher in the Mahdi?

Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a firm believer in the end of days scenario in which the 12th Imam, or Mahdi, will usher in a new era and rule Israel for 7 years (!!!). In fact, his belief in the 12th Imam pretty much controls his actions, as he believes that great calamity must come against Muslims before the 12th Imam can arrive on the scene.

Here is a news tidbit from from Reuters in 2005:

(Note, since this article is no longer available on Reuters, I have linked it from Jihadwatch)

“Our revolution’s main mission is to pave the way for the reappearance of the 12th Imam, the Mahdi,” Ahmadinejad said in the speech to Friday Prayers leaders from across the country.

“Therefore, Iran should become a powerful, developed and model Islamic society.”

“Today, we should define our economic, cultural and political policies based on the policy of Imam Mahdi’s return. We should avoid copying the West’s policies and systems,” he added, newspapers and local news agencies reported.

Ahmadinejad refers to the return of the 12th Imam, also known as the Mahdi, in almost all his major speeches since he took office in August.

[…]

Founded in 1953 and used by the Shah of Iran to try to eradicate followers of the Bahai faith, the Hojjatieh Society is governed by the conviction that the 12th Imam’s return will be hastened by the creation of chaos on earth.

Combine that with the following article from today’s Forbes Magazine, and you’ve got some real end of world, “dogs and cats living together” type stuff, eh?

Is Barack Obama the “promised warrior” coming to help the Hidden Imam of Shiite Muslims conquer the world?

The question has made the rounds in Iran since last month, when a pro-government Web site published a Hadith (or tradition) from a Shiite text of the 17th century. The tradition comes from Bahar al-Anvar (meaning Oceans of Light) by Mullah Majlisi, a magnum opus in 132 volumes and the basis of modern Shiite Islam.

According to the tradition, Imam Ali Ibn Abi-Talib (the prophet’s cousin and son-in-law) prophesied that at the End of Times and just before the return of the Mahdi, the Ultimate Saviour, a “tall black man will assume the reins of government in the West.” Commanding “the strongest army on earth,” the new ruler in the West will carry “a clear sign” from the third imam, whose name was Hussein Ibn Ali. The tradition concludes: “Shiites should have no doubt that he is with us.”

In a curious coincidence Obama’s first and second names–Barack Hussein–mean “the blessing of Hussein” in Arabic and Persian. His family name, Obama, written in the Persian alphabet, reads O Ba Ma, which means “he is with us,” the magic formula in Majlisi’s tradition.

Mystical reasons aside, the Khomeinist establishment sees Obama’s rise as another sign of the West’s decline and the triumph of Islam. Obama’s promise to seek unconditional talks with the Islamic Republic is cited as a sign that the U.S. is ready to admit defeat. Obama’s position could mean abandoning three resolutions passed by the United Nations Security Council setting conditions that Iran should meet to avoid sanctions. Seeking unconditional talks with the Khomeinists also means an admission of moral equivalence between the U.S. and the Islamic Republic. It would imply an end to the description by the U.S. of the regime as a “systematic violator of human rights.”

Obama has abandoned claims by all U.S. administrations in the past 30 years that Iran is “a state sponsor of terrorism.” Instead, he uses the term “violent groups” to describe Iran-financed outfits such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

Obama has also promised to attend a summit of the Organization of the Islamic Conference within the first 100 days of his presidency. Such a move would please the mullahs, who have always demanded that Islam be treated differently, and that Muslim nations act as a bloc in dealings with Infidel nations.

Obama’s election would boost President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s chances of winning a second term next June. Ahmadinejad’s entourage claim that his “steadfastness in resisting the American Great Satan” was a factor in helping Obama defeat “hardliners” such as Hillary Clinton and, later, it hopes, John McCain.

“President Ahmadinejad has taught Americans a lesson,” says Hassan Abbasi, a “strategic adviser” to the Iranian president. “This is why they are now choosing someone who understands Iran’s power.” The Iranian leader’s entourage also point out that Obama copied his campaign slogan “Yes, We Can” from Ahmadinejad’s “We Can,” used four years ago.

A number of Khomeinist officials have indicated their preference for Obama over McCain, who is regarded as an “enemy of Islam.” A Foreign Ministry spokesman says Iran does not wish to dictate the choice of the Americans but finds Obama “a better choice for everyone.” Ali Larijani, Speaker of the Islamic Majlis, Iran’s ersatz parliament, has gone further by saying the Islamic Republic “prefers to see Barack Obama in the White House” next year.

Tehran’s penchant for Obama, reflected in the official media, increased when the Illinois senator chose Joseph Biden as his vice-presidential running mate. Biden was an early supporter of the Khomeinist revolution in 1978-1979 and, for the past 30 years, has been a consistent advocate of recognizing the Islamic Republic as a regional power. He has close ties with Khomeinist lobbyists in the U.S. and has always voted against sanctions on Iran.

Ahmadinejad has described the U.S. as a “sunset” (ofuli) power as opposed to Islam, which he says is a “sunrise” (toluee) power. Last summer, he inaugurated an international conference called World Without America–attended by anti-Americans from all over the world, including the U.S.

Seen from Tehran, Obama’s election would demoralize the U.S. armed forces by casting doubt on their victories in Iraq and Afghanistan, if not actually transforming them into defeat. American retreat from the Middle East under Obama would enable the Islamic Republic to pursue hegemony of the region. Tehran is especially interested in dominating Iraq, thus consolidating a new position that extends its power to the Mediterranean through Syria and Lebanon.

During the World Without America conference, several speakers speculated that Obama would show “understanding of Muslim grievances” with regard to Palestine. Ahmadinejad hopes to persuade a future President Obama to adopt the “Iranian solution for Palestine,” which aims at creating a single state in which Jews would quickly become a minority.

Judging by anecdotal evidence and the buzz among Iranian bloggers, while the ruling Khomeinists favor Obama, the mass of Iranians regard (and dislike) the Democrat candidate as an appeaser of the mullahs. Iran, along with Israel, is the only country in the Middle East where the United States remains popular. An Obama presidency, perceived as friendly to the oppressive regime in Tehran, may change that.

I think all these people gravely underestimate Americans. Not our government, but our people. Our government is a puppet of the world’s most corrupt, providing validation and appeasement to dictators and murderers. But the American people are an entirely different matter…

A well-made & informative video, Vince, which I have downloaded, and (briefly) I
respect both Joel Richardson and Walid Shoebat and the view that Mahdi will be the
Antichrist, I am not persuaded that this is so. Islam is not the only “bad wolf” seeking
to devour – there are also Dominionists / Reconstructionists who believe they have a
mandate to “take dominion” over the earth and enforce Old Testament law in order
for Jesus Christ to return; there are those who believe that Islam has a mandate to
establish a global Caliphate under Sharia Law (Mahdi); there are those who believe
that Moshiach will appear and rule from the Third Temple and enforce the Noahide
Laws on gentiles, via the Sanhedrin & noahide courts; and there are “New Agers”
looking for a “World Teacher” (or “christed” person) to lead humanity into the
New Age (Age of Aquarius).

Antichrist could be any or all of these, but the most likely candidate to me, going by
AC’s job & person description, is “Moshiach”, a false Messiah who will facilitate
the rebuilding of the Temple, and who will ultimately rule from it, showing himself
to be god, and demanding to be worshipped as god.

If my understanding is correct, Ezekiel 38 / 39 is not the same battle as
Armageddon, and will occur at or about the time of Jesus’ return for the Church
(“rapture”), while Armageddon will occur at the end of the Tribulation, when
Jesus returns with the saints.

Incidentally, if Mahdi is Antichrist, why would he sit in the temple of God, rather
than in the al Aqsa mosque / Mosque of Omar / Dome of the Rock? Would muslims
find it strange & infuriating to see the islamic stuff removed, by natural occurrence
or by bulldozer & the Temple built in their place? They don’t seem too keen on the
Jewish ambition to rebuild the Temple.

But 2 Thessalonians 2:4 certainly implies that AC rules from the Temple:
Who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped;
so that he as God sits in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.

This Ezekiel 38 video on YouTube is a reasonable depiction of the largely Islamic
invasion of Israel, and the resulting destruction of the invaders …