Look at the turnover comparison tho..he makes the right decision most of the time, whereas Romo gambles. Sometimes with spectacular results, sometimes with disastrous results...and also don't assume because he put up 17 points with the skill players he currently has he would put up 17 with ours. The kid engineers a lot of scoring drives. think of all the games we could have won easily if we could have put up more first half points?

Maybe so, but the Cowboys, in general, have bigger problems than at the QB position. So again, can you get by with Romo while strengthening other positions? Yes, you can.

Redskins had some good pieces on the team, but no QB. You NEEDED to get RGIII. A consistently performing QB has done wonders for you guys.

The Cowboys don't NEED a QB. They NEED to strengthen the OL, the safety, and the DL positions, and I wouldn't get mad if they got another OLB.

All of this is true. I would never point the finger at Romo as being the sole source of our problems. Frankly he saves our butts plenty of times, and deserves more love for his efforts. Of course, he gets us into hot water on occasion as well....but he's more than capable of taking this team all the way. I do believe Rg3 could come here and have much success in our system as well though.

I would say No. I like the youth and talent of RGIII but I also think his game will be limited, much like Cam once the league has a chance to really study the tape on him in the off season. Now if you ask about Luck, I would do that in a heart beat and I LOVE Romo as our QB. But Luck is the prototype QB. RGIII is extremely talented but will always be a gimmick type QB, much like Vick, although RGIII is a much better passer. And until one of these very athletic QB's wins a SB, I will stick with the Prototype QB, Romo, Luck, Brees, Brady, etc.

This is such a dumb poll. The answer is YES. For so many reasons. None of which include Romo being sub par as an NFL QB, he is quite the opposite. However, the answer is a resounding YES. Franchise QB for the next 10 years? Sign me up.

One thing for sure RGIII is not being asked to do what Romo does. Skins avg 167 yards a game on the ground they keep themselfs in makable down and distance. Not much different than what SF is doing by running the ball effectively they keep the QB in an ideal situation. RGIII has put up 325 passes compared to Romo 483

I posted this poll because I had a conversation with my buddy and he was saying no way in hell and I couldn't possibly see why. It is strange how close this poll is. I thought it would be a landslide for RGIII.

Rg3 is arguably already a consistently better decision maker throwing the football than romo.

I don't agree with this statement. I mean, yes RG3 is having a great year, especially in light of the fact that he is a rookie but to say that he is already a better decision maker is a stretch IMO. He plays in a much more simplified offense then does Romo. In fact, Romo plays in one of the most complicated offenses in the league. It's a different animal all together. In order to be able to say taht RG3 is a better decision maker, he would have to illustrate that by executing in a more complicated, more complex offense and that has not happened.

Lets also keep in mind that while RG3 is having a great year, he has still thrown for a 1000 yards less then has Romo this season, completed more then 100 less passes then has Romo. That tells you that he is throwing a lot less and is throwing down field a lot less as well.

I realize that. I believe RG3 would be better in the Cowboys offense than Romo and make it seem better...same as he does for the Redskins.

I also believe he has more upside than Romo at this point of their respective careers.

Eventually, this might be true but right now, there is no way RG3 would be better then Romo in this offense. No way, no how, no chance. RG3 might eventually surpass Romo's skill currently but not right now.