"TOP SECRET" U.S MILITARY DOCUMENT DECLARES EXISTENCE OF "DOMESTIC INSURGENCY" INSIDE UNITED STATES

"TOP SECRET" U.S MILITARY DOCUMENT DECLARES EXISTENCE OF "DOMESTIC INSURGENCY" INSIDE UNITED STATES

PLAN OUTLINES GOVERNMENT INTENT TO USE MILITARY FORCE AGAINST U.S. CITIZENS OVER POLITICAL ISSUES!DESCRIBES USING PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS, OUTRIGHT MILITARY FORCE AND MEDIA PROPAGANDA AGAINST U.S. CITIZENS

By: Hal Turner

North Bergen, NJ -- As a radio talk show host, I receive a whole slew of e-mail and regular mail about virtually every issue under the sun. Much of it gets deleted or thrown away. Some of it results in stories appearing on my web site or being discussed on my show. Every once in awhile, something akin to a bombshell arrives and yesterday, July 18, 2007 was one such day.

I came into possession of portions of a U.S. military plan which was allegedly classified "Top Secret." This put me in a bind because without having a security clearance myself, having something which is Classified is unlawful. Reading such a document is also unlawful and revealing it to the public is definietly unlawful. So, I thought about it. I decided screw it, I'm going to read it.

As I read the document, my blood ran cold. Chills ran up my spine. The hair on the back of my neck stood up. My gut started churning. This document is an operational plan to use U.S. military troops against U.S. Citizens!

The plan says "A perceived serious potential of dissident American groups rising up against constituted authority has been clearly identified by counter-intelligence agencies.[Underlining mine]

The plan goes on to say why people are clearly thinking of rising up and throwing-off our federal government by saying "The stated cause for such an uprising appear to be growing dissatisfaction with the course and conduct of the war in Iraq, the chronic inability of Congress to deal with various pressing issues and the perception of widespread corruption and indifference to public needs."

Sounds accurate to me. In fact, it describes perfectly reasonable justification for the America people to utilize our original right of self-defense against such a government or for us to impose reform!

Most stunning about the plan is that it talks about political reform and offers an unbelievably out-of-touch, completely un-American observation: "Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state . . . . ."

A matter for the state? We The People ARE the state. We The People decide on reform. For this U.S. military plan to assert "Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state" is like reading something out of the old Soviet Union! What planet are these people on?

The truly chilling parts of this plan involve the use of "Informant nets" of Americans literally spying on their fellow citizens and "Block Control" where the plan calls for "trusted resident reports on the activities of people in their neighborhoods." Folks, this is what Fidel Castro does in Communist Cuba!

As you read the details below, remember this: This plan has been drawn up by OUR military. The military WE hired, WE train, WE equip, WE feed, WE clothe, WE house. It is an OUTRAGE that anyone in our military would DARE to even create such plan, nevermind try to implement it!

A Blunt warning to our Government and our Military:

In our nation of 300 million people, there are at least 95 million lawful gun owners. Those 95 million guns owners lawfully possess 212 million firearms.

Even if the government recalled ALL military members from around the entire world, they would have a force of only about two million.

95 million gun owners versus 2 million troops. I think we all know how this would turn out: the government would be slaughtered.

In fact, if only ten percent of the 95 million gun owners had guts enough to fight, we would still outnumber the military almost 3:1.

We The People of the United States aren't the least bit worried about government tanks and planes, those tools are useless in guerilla warfare. Want proof? Iraq! The U.S. government is getting its ass kicked over there. Government wouldn't last a week if they tried implenting this plan here.

Government would do well to remember they exist at the whim and behest of the American people. Government in this land exists to serve us as we direct.

The power government wields belongs to The People. We The People merely LEND part of our power to government and we have the absolute right to take that power back at any time we deem appropriate. In fact, the founding fathers made clear we can take it back in any MANNER we deem appropriate! That's why they gave us the Second Amendment!

If the U.S. government or military dares attempt to implement this plan, they should expect to be killed.

----------------- PRECIS OF THE PLAN ---------------------

Classification: Top Secret-Noforn as of 1 June 2007

Distribution Restriction: Distribution authorized to the DOD and DOD contractors only to maintain operations security. This determination was made on 1 June 2007. Other requests for this document must be referred to (redacted)

Destruction Notice: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document. .

This publication uses the term insurgent to describe those taking part in any activity designed to undermine or to overthrow the established authorities

Counterinsurgency is those military, paramilitary, political, economic, psychological, and civicactions taken by a government to defeat insurgency (JP 1-02). It is an offensive approach involving all elements of national power; it can take place across the range of operations and spectrum of conflict

In dealing with the local populace, the primary aims must be to:

·Protect the population.

·Establish local political institutions.

·Reinforce local governments.

·Eliminate insurgent capabilities.

·Exploit information from local sources.

An insurgency is organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a constituted government through use of subversion and armed conflict (JP 1-02). It is a protracted politico-military struggle designed to weaken government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control. Political power is the central issue in an insurgency.

An insurgent organization normally consists of four elements:

Leadership.

Combatants (main forces, regional forces, local forces).

Cadre (local political leaders that are also called the militants).

Mass base (the bulk of the membership).

The support of the people, passive or active then, is the center of gravity. It must be gained in whatever proportion is necessary to sustain the insurgent movement (or, contrariwise, to defeat it). As in any political campaign, all levels of support are relative.

Insurgent movements begin as "fire in the minds of men." Insurgent leaders commit themselves to building a new world. They construct the organization to carry through this desire. Generally, popular grievances become insurgent causes when interpreted and shaped by the insurgent leadership. The insurgency grows if the cadre that is local insurgent leaders and representatives can establish a link between the insurgent movement and the desire for solutions to grievances sought by the local population

Insurgent leaders will exploit opportunities created by government security force actions. The behavior of security forces is critical. Lack of security force discipline leads to alienation, and security force abuse of the populace is a very effective insurgent recruiting tool. Consequently, specific insurgent tactical actions are often planned to frequently elicit overreaction from security force individuals and units.

Insurgencies are dynamic political movements, resulting from real or perceived grievance or neglect that leads to alienation from an established government.

A successful counterinsurgency will result in the neutralization by the state of the insurgency and its effort to form a counterstate. While many abortive insurgencies are defeated by military and police actions alone, if an insurgency has tapped into serious grievances and has mobilized a significant portion of the population, simply returning to the status quo may not be an option. Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state, using all of its human and material resources. Security forces are only one such resource. The response must be multifaceted and coordinated, yet states typically charge their security forces with "waging counterinsurgency." This the security forces cannot do alone.

These imperatives are-

· Facilitate establishment or reestablishment of a 'legitimate government'.

· Counterinsurgency requires perseverance.

· Foster popular support for the incumbent US government.

· Prepare to perform functions and conduct operations that are outside normal scope of training.

· Coordinate with US governmental departments and agencies, and with vital non-governmental, agencies.

Urban operations.

· Protection of government facilities.

· Protection of infrastructure.

· Protection of commercial enterprises vital to the HN economy.

· Protection of cultural facilities.

· Prevention of looting.

· Military police functions.

· Close interaction with civilians.

· Assistance with reconstruction projects.

· Securing the national borders.

· Training or retraining a national military police and security force.

Establishing and maintaining local government credibility.

· Contributing local government is both tangible and psychological. Local security forces must reinforce and be integrated into the plan at every stage.

· Facilitate and use information and intelligence obtained from local sources to gain access to the insurgent's economic and social base of support, order of battle, tactics, techniques, and procedures.

Army forces help local pro-government police, paramilitary, and military forces perform counterinsurgency, area security, or local security operations. They advise and assist in finding, dispersing, capturing, and destroying the insurgent force.

US forces may conduct offensive operations to disrupt and destroy insurgent combat formations. These operations prevent the insurgents from attacking government-controlled areas.

There are many organizations and extensive resources available to aid counterinsurgent forces.

Commanders should not overlook the aid these organizations may provide. All forces assigned an AO or function should determine which departments and agencies are assisting in that AO and coordinate actions so that there is no duplication of effort. Such departments,

councils and agencies include-

· National Security Council.

· Department of Defense.

· Department of State.

· Department of Justice.

· Department of the Treasury.

· Department of Homeland Security.

· Department of Agriculture.

· Department of Commerce.

· Central Intelligence Agency.

· Department of Transportation

Various governmental departments directly administer or support other governmental agencies. Examples of these US agencies are-

. The proper application of force is a critical component to any successful counterinsurgency operation. In a counterinsurgency, the center of gravity is public support. In order to defeat an insurgent force, US forces must be able to separate insurgents from the population. At the same time, US forces must conduct themselves in a manner that enables them to maintain popular domestic support. Excessive or indiscriminant use of force is likely to alienate the local populace, thereby increasing support for insurgent forces. Insufficient use of force results in increased risks to US forces and perceived weaknesses that can jeopardize the mission by emboldening insurgents and undermining domestic popular support. Achieving the appropriate balance requires a thorough understanding of the nature and causes of the insurgency, the end state, and the military's role in a counterinsurgency operation. Nevertheless, US forces always retain the right to use necessary and proportional force for individual and unit self-defense in response to a hostile act or demonstrated hostile intent.

The media, print and broadcast (radio, television and the Internet), play a vital role in societies involved in a counterinsurgency. Members of the media have a significant influence and shaping impact on political direction, national security objectives, and policy and national will. The media is a factor in military operations. It is their right and obligation to report to their respective audiences on the use of military force. They demand logistic support and access to military operations while refusing to be controlled. Their desire for immediate footage and on-the-spot coverage of events, and the increasing contact with units and Soldiers (for example, with embedded reporters) require commanders and public affairs officers to provide guidance to leaders and Soldiers on media relations. However, military planners must provide and enforce ground rules to the media to ensure operations security. Public affairs offices plan for daily briefings and a special briefing after each significant event because the media affect and influence each potential target audience external and internal to the AO. Speaking with the media in a forward-deployed area is an opportunity to explain what our organizations and efforts have accomplished.

Continuous PSYOP are mounted to-

· Counter the effects of insurgent propaganda.

· Relate controls to the security and well-being of the population.

· Portray a favorable governmental image.

.Control measures must-

· Be authorized by national laws and regulations (counterparts should be trained not to improvise unauthorized measures).

· Be tailored to fit the situation (apply the minimum force required to achieve the de-sired result).

· Be supported by effective local intelligence.

· Be instituted in as wide an area as possible to prevent bypass or evasion.

· Be supported by good communications.

· Be enforceable.

· Be lifted as the need diminishes.

· Be compatible, where possible, with local customs and traditions.

· Establish and maintain credibility of local government.

A control program may be developed in five phases:

· Securing and defending the area internally and externally.

· Organizing for law enforcement.

· Executing cordon and search operations.

· Screening and documenting the population (performing a detailed census).

· Performing public administration, to include resource control.

Support to the judiciary may be limited to providing security to the existing courts or may lead to more comprehensive actions to build local, regional, and national courts and the required support apparatus. To avoid overcrowding in police jails, the courts must have an efficient and timely magistrate capability, ideally co-located with police stations and police jails, to review cases for trial.

Cordon and search is a technique used by military and police forces in both urban and rural environments. It is frequently used by counterinsurgency forces conducting a population and resource control mission against small centers of population or subdivisions of a larger community. To be effective, cordon and search operations must have sufficient forces to effectively cordon off and thoroughly search target areas, to include subsurface areas.

PSYOP, civil affairs, and specialist interrogation teams should augment cordon and search orces to increase the effectiveness of operations. Consider the following when conducting cordon and search operations:

Cordon and search operations may be conducted as follows:

Disposition of troops should-

· Facilitate visual contact between posts within the cordon.

· Provide for adequate patrolling and immediate deployment of an effective re-serve force.

· Search all occupants. When available, a third team member should be the re-corder.

· Place documents in a numbered envelope and tag the associated individual with a corresponding number.

SCREENING AND DOCUMENTING THE POPULATION

Screening and documentation include following:

· Systematic identification and registration.

· Issuance of individual identification cards containing-

A unique number.

Picture of individual.

Personal identification data.

Fingerprints.

An official stamp (use different colors for each administration region).

Family group census cards, an official copy of which is retained at the local po-lice agency. These must include a picture and appropriate personal data.

Frequent use of mobile and fixed checkpoints for inspection, identification, and reg-istration of documents.

Preventing counterfeiting of identification and registration documents by laminat-ing and embossing.

Programs to inform the population of the need for identification and registration.

Covert surveillance is a collection effort with the responsibility fixed at the intelligence/security division or detective division of the police department. Covert techniques, ranging from application of sophisticated electronics systems to informants, should include-

Informant nets. Reliability of informants should be verified. Protection of identity is a must.

Block control. Dividing a community or populated area into zones where a trusted resident reports on the activities of the population. If the loyalty of block leaders is questionable, an informant net can be established to verify questionable areas.

. . . . . . The document continues, page after page, throughout almost nine-hundred pages. In those other pages, the document outlines "REX 84" "FEMA concentration camps", already established, constructed and manned inside the United States, to be utilized to house "insurgents" who are rounded-up by government.

Conclusions

When I read the document, I knew that I could be criminally prosecuted for having it, prosecuted on a separate charge for reading it and prosecuted yet again for releasing information contained within it.

I decided that the threat to Liberty posed by the document made it imperative that I take action and I have done so. Now, all of you know!

I also realized that in order for the U.S. Government to prosecute me, the document would have to be authentic. They would have to admit the Document is authentic and actually Classified in order to bring any prosecution.

Since such an admission would prove me right and be an ominous warning to all of you that real trouble is here, I suspect I am safe from any reprisals for the time being. It's a gamble with enormous consequences, but saving our Republic from a tyrannical government is worth my risk.

It is clear to me that very serious things are on the horizon here in America. It will be up to us, citizen-patriots, to step up to defend our liberty. I am ready. Are you?

what would be cool is if some domestic insurgency was hell bent on destroying the us government, stole nukes from soviet perplakistan and planted them in 20 us cities via white cargo vans! Low and behold, the main perp was the head or a very high up at the department of homeland security!!!!!

what would be cool is if some domestic insurgency was hell bent on destroying the us government, stole nukes from soviet perplakistan and planted them in 20 us cities via white cargo vans! Low and behold, the main perp was the head or a very high up at the department of homeland security!!!!!

what would be cool is if some domestic insurgency was hell bent on destroying the us government, stole nukes from soviet perplakistan and planted them in 20 us cities via white cargo vans! Low and behold, the main perp was the head or a very high up at the department of homeland security!!!!!

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 190126

Mossad is going to be pissed with you exposing their plans. They intend to blame it on I'll kidya, then martial law will be introduced, all elections will be cancelled and Israels hero messiah Bush will remain in power as Dictator and great decider until he dies.

what would be cool is if some domestic insurgency was hell bent on destroying the us government, stole nukes from soviet perplakistan and planted them in 20 us cities via white cargo vans! Low and behold, the main perp was the head or a very high up at the department of homeland security!!!!!

Guys, I see they are trying to get this to happen so they can declare martial law. Bush signs an executive order on the 17th, this guy gets his hands on this the 18th. That is just to concidential. Are you tried of being manipulated yet? Do not work into their plans, they have them ironed out and ready to go? You can win at your own game which is fight without the need for martial law. You will have to fight where the money is, and you will feel pain, but eventually you will pull through.

what would be cool is if some domestic insurgency was hell bent on destroying the us government, stole nukes from soviet perplakistan and planted them in 20 us cities via white cargo vans! Low and behold, the main perp was the head or a very high up at the department of homeland security!!!!!

You must be Robert Hawkins.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 129376

And you must be an idiot.The person you named would oppose any such invading force and stand against it.This could be precieved as a threat to shut up and an attempt to vilify a particular individual.It is also aviolation of that persons privacy and an endangerment to his life.His post was removed. It was the one that defined insurgency and terrorism.

It is hardly correct or logicaly reasonable to view an individual who always has supported a return to constitutional rule of law in a given country an insurgent force, a person who has always advocated justice and the rule of law being applied to everyone and not violence of any kind. That is Robert Hawkins, that's who he really is. Ron Paul represents him in congress. He can't think of anyone else who does.

Often criminal conspirators often protray a desire for justice and a expresion of such desire as a threat to society, like you seem to be emplying Robert Hawkins is with your post. There are alot of people who do not know who IDW is that would like to see him dead.What you have done here is violate a decent mans privacy for the purposes of intimidation. It will not work. Some things are worth putting ones life on the line for, and justice is one of them.

Guys, I see they are trying to get this to happen so they can declare martial law. Bush signs an executive order on the 17th, this guy gets his hands on this the 18th. That is just to concidential. Are you tried of being manipulated yet? Do not work into their plans, they have them ironed out and ready to go? You can win at your own game which is fight without the need for martial law. You will have to fight where the money is, and you will feel pain, but eventually you will pull through.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 148107

Exactly...............nothing they get off on more than the words 'Domestic insurgency' and 'mutilculturalism' which in effect has opened the door to lead to this.

Guys, I see they are trying to get this to happen so they can declare martial law. Bush signs an executive order on the 17th, this guy gets his hands on this the 18th. That is just to concidential. Are you tried of being manipulated yet? Do not work into their plans, they have them ironed out and ready to go? You can win at your own game which is fight without the need for martial law. You will have to fight where the money is, and you will feel pain, but eventually you will pull through.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 148107

Exactly...............nothing they get off on more than the words 'Domestic insurgency' and 'mutilculturalism' which in effect has opened the door to lead to this.

what would be cool is if some domestic insurgency was hell bent on destroying the us government, stole nukes from soviet perplakistan and planted them in 20 us cities via white cargo vans! Low and behold, the main perp was the head or a very high up at the department of homeland security!!!!!

You must be Robert Hawkins.

And you must be an idiot.The person you named would oppose any such invading force and stand against it.This could be precieved as a threat to shut up and an attempt to vilify a particular individual.It is also aviolation of that persons privacy and an endangerment to his life.His post was removed. It was the one that defined insurgency and terrorism.

It is hardly correct or logicaly reasonable to view an individual who always has supported a return to constitutional rule of law in a given country an insurgent force, a person who has always advocated justice and the rule of law being applied to everyone and not violence of any kind. That is Robert Hawkins, that's who he really is. Ron Paul represents him in congress. He can't think of anyone else who does.

Often criminal conspirators often protray a desire for justice and a expresion of such desire as a threat to society, like you seem to be emplying Robert Hawkins is with your post. There are alot of people who do not know who IDW is that would like to see him dead.What you have done here is violate a decent mans privacy for the purposes of intimidation. It will not work. Some things are worth putting ones life on the line for, and justice is one of them.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 272743

I would never make a comment even sounding rmotely like the post that was hung around my neck like a stinking albatross. It ain't my style, boys!The fact is, the person (myself)named has always warned his readers not to fall into the trap that was set for them, and to oppose the zionist controlled federal government with force. I welcome any questions on my political agenda, which is simply a return to rule of law and to Constitutional government. Rememebr, it is the Constitution that defines the ligitamet government in the United states. That's what I learned.

I have always maintained that thats what they want us to do, to justify a crackdown with violence, and I am against ANY form of violence excepting self defence, when ones life is in imminent danger. I have also urged my readers NOT to engage in such acts of violence against the government, and I see ALL who do as empowering the enemy whether that is thier intent or not. I also strongly feel that IS thier intent!In short, I personally feel such acts would be futile and self defeating to the agenda of justice and a return to constitutional rule of law in the Unites States. I personally believe this leaked memo is a fabrication, for two reasons. 1) because the military can't possibly see the majority of people in thier own country who oppose the current administration and its agenda as an "insurgency", and 2)If it were a classified document it wouldn't still be posted.I have always maintained that I believe the primary obejective of 911 was to terrorize tha American people into accepting a degredation of individual rights, and to empower a specific political agenda. I believe the ones behid it intended us to blame it on the current administration, which is only a link in a chain of abuses. I beleive 911 was intended to be discovered for what it is, so the American people would rise up in violent civil unrest. I personally applaud thier self control in not doing so. Most have continued to learn and teach what they have learned, exposing the truth. Most of us know civil unrest is being provked, and simply refuse to fall into that trap.The TRUTH is more deadly to this agenda than any weapon. That's why they consider the purveyors of truth the enemy, obviously. They have known my name since I made my first post, so threatening me like this is a useless gesture on your part. I have never hidden my name through proxies, I use a standard ISP with a dial up connection, If you want to talk to me, you know where I am. Otherwise, stop publishing my name in a forum frequented by zionists with links to real terrorists!

More than likely these are false flags, intended to be blamed on domestic terrorists.No doubt some who have lost thier asses in the past few years are angry enough to commit terrorist acts, they are few and far between. Most people have evolved beyond that kind of thinking,

Today there is a new class of radically new and important radio frequency weapons (RFW) which merits your attention as it emerges. And in this case, the horse is out of the barn. Transfers have occurred and are occurring. Equally true, however, is the fact that there are things that can be done to protect our nation, which is the underlying objective of today's hearing. Certainly one of these things is to recognize that export control documents, particularly the Militarily Critical Technologies List, needs to be reviewed to determine if radio frequency technologies should be considered in the same careful way we do nuclear technologies. I respectfully suggest that this is the case; stronger controls are needed. One example is Reltron tubes which went to a friendly nation, one who sells products widely--sometimes to nations who do not like us. These tubes, which can be small or large, generate intense radio frequency pulses and can be used as RF weapons.

Today there is a new class of radically new and important radio frequency weapons (RFW) which merits your attention as it emerges. And in this case, the horse is out of the barn. Transfers have occurred and are occurring. Equally true, however, is the fact that there are things that can be done to protect our nation, which is the underlying objective of today's hearing. Certainly one of these things is to recognize that export control documents, particularly the Militarily Critical Technologies List, needs to be reviewed to determine if radio frequency technologies should be considered in the same careful way we do nuclear technologies. I respectfully suggest that this is the case; stronger controls are needed. One example is Reltron tubes which went to a friendly nation, one who sells products widely--sometimes to nations who do not like us. These tubes, which can be small or large, generate intense radio frequency pulses and can be used as RF weapons.

Today there is a new class of radically new and important radio frequency weapons (RFW) which merits your attention as it emerges. And in this case, the horse is out of the barn. Transfers have occurred and are occurring. Equally true, however, is the fact that there are things that can be done to protect our nation, which is the underlying objective of today's hearing. Certainly one of these things is to recognize that export control documents, particularly the Militarily Critical Technologies List, needs to be reviewed to determine if radio frequency technologies should be considered in the same careful way we do nuclear technologies. I respectfully suggest that this is the case; stronger controls are needed. One example is Reltron tubes which went to a friendly nation, one who sells products widely--sometimes to nations who do not like us. These tubes, which can be small or large, generate intense radio frequency pulses and can be used as RF weapons.

Yeah, and Hal Turner is a shit stirrer who's instigating the people to violence. If he succeeds we have no chance of ever seeing a soveriegn constitutional republic.

Let's face it, people who oppose the globalist agenda are bing singled out as the enemy by our government. Thats because we are already under a global government. Remember Yugoslavia. Bush is our Slobadan Malochavich. We must not allow our country to erupt in civil unrest, THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT "THEY" WANT!

what would be cool is if some domestic insurgency was hell bent on destroying the us government, stole nukes from soviet perplakistan and planted them in 20 us cities via white cargo vans! Low and behold, the main perp was the head or a very high up at the department of homeland security!!!!!

Today there is a new class of radically new and important radio frequency weapons (RFW) which merits your attention as it emerges. And in this case, the horse is out of the barn. Transfers have occurred and are occurring. Equally true, however, is the fact that there are things that can be done to protect our nation, which is the underlying objective of today's hearing. Certainly one of these things is to recognize that export control documents, particularly the Militarily Critical Technologies List, needs to be reviewed to determine if radio frequency technologies should be considered in the same careful way we do nuclear technologies. I respectfully suggest that this is the case; stronger controls are needed. One example is Reltron tubes which went to a friendly nation, one who sells products widely--sometimes to nations who do not like us. These tubes, which can be small or large, generate intense radio frequency pulses and can be used as RF weapons.

Most stunning about the plan is that it talks about political reform and offers an unbelievably out-of-touch, completely un-American observation: "Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state . . . . ."

A matter for the state? We The People ARE the state. We The People decide on reform. For this U.S. military plan to assert "Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state" is like reading something out of the old Soviet Union! What planet are these people on?