we had just finished doing the typical mind-numbing bullshit VC panel on what's trendy / what's hot. (which was of course, incredibly insightful and useful... NOT). next, the attendees -- all 300 of them -- were asked to get up and do a quick pitch on the startup idea they wanted to do over the weekend. the concept here was that other people might hear the idea & want to join forces. now, not to say there aren't some flaws with listening to 300 people do a quick pitch in a crowded room with terrible acoustics, but beyond that auditory imposition, there was one other big problem:

almost all of those pitches SUCKED ASS.

big time.

after about the 4th or 5th one, i just couldn't stand it any longer. i was NOT going to sit thru an hour-and-a-half of shitty elevator pitches.

so i grabbed the mike from the next open-mouthed entrepreneur and said:

"Ok folks... if there's ONE thing i can help you with tonight, it's how to pitch. it's very simple, and i can teach you in about 5 minutes."

"Here's the secret:PITCH THE PROBLEM, NOT THE SOLUTION."

"That's it. done! that's all there is... just tell me the problem FIRST, not the SOLUTION. the reason is, i may not be able to understand what your solution does, but if you connect emotionally with me on what the problem is -- and i hopefully i also have the problem, or know someone who does -- then i'll give you PERMISSION to tell me more about how you're going to solve the problem."

after that, i handed the mike back to the entrepreneur... and you can guess what they did.

yoo betcha.

they pitched their solution.

and i interrupted them, RUDELY &WITHOUT MERCY.

i grabbed the mike back and said:

"THAT WAS NOT A PROBLEM.

THAT WAS YOUR SOLUTION.

DO IT *AGAIN*."

and they tried their best, and barely got through the problem statement. then they handed the mike to the next entrepreneur. and guess what happened? yep, AGAIN, they pitched their SOLUTION.

and i again, i rudely stopped them, grabbed the mike back, and said again "Nope. that was another SOLUTION. tell me what the PROBLEM is that you're solving... i guarantee you, the PROBLEM is NOT that the world doesn't have enough RSS readers out there." again, they barely got thru stating problem.

this happened for another 4-5 entrepreneurs. they would pitch their SOLUTION. i would then be a dick, yell for them to stop, have them start over, and state the PROBLEM first. after about 10-15 minutes of this insanity, i think i scared the shit out of them, and perhaps only to stop me from berating them publicly in front of several hundred people, they FINALLY started pitching the PROBLEM.

slowly, excruciatingly, over the course of the next half-hour, the pitches gradually got better. they didn't necessarily get good, mind you... but they didn't completely suck balls. they were at least easier to understand, and by end of evening most pitches were understandable, if perhaps still crappy.

and i made a name for myself as perhaps the biggest asshole VC of the northern california area.

but that aside, i made three hundred people NEVER forget the point i was trying to make, and hopefully at least 5-10% of them will have a slightly better pitch the next time they get stuck in an elevator with a VC.

if so, then it will have been worth me being such a complete dick.

remember folks: pitch the PROBLEM first, connect with your audience emotionally around the problem, and then -- and ONLY then -- offer your solution as the remedy to that problem.

Comments

I would generally be in whole-hearted agreement with everything said here, especially when talking about any sort of enterprise, SAAS, etc. product. Too may pitches get bogged down in what the startup intends to do, rather than explaining to the the VC, why they should care in the first.

Buuuuuuut, to play devils advocate, or just to call bullshit on this whole "problem first" tirade and avoid another smoke-blowing response, it seems like many, if not most, of today's consumer internet companies and tech startups appear to be solutions to "problems" that barely ever existed, if at all.

I mean, what "problem" did Twitter solve? Were people really sitting around stymied by the inability to send messages of less than 140 characters?
What was Google, like the 15th or 20th major search engine on the market?
Why did we need Facebook when we already had Myspace and Friendster?
What would Foursquare's "problem first" pitch look like?: "Mobile users are frustrated by their inability to earn points and badges everytime they stop by the grocery store to pick up a carton of milk?"

Strong problem statement/understanding is crtically are important for some, but not necessarily all.

It depends on the stage of development your company's market environment. Pitching Twitter 5 years ago versus pitching a new "within 30 minutes" pizza delivery service in New York. The latter is all about pitching solutions...

Seriously though, great passion & great advice. I enjoyed reading the Dick Principle post you linked to as well: "You have 30 seconds. For the most effective pitch, focus 80% on the problem, 20% on the solution."

Problem focus or market needs are often forgotten, I agree.
People talk about "customers do not always know what they want" but even then the focus should be on what you solve - the problem, rather than the solution.

By the way, splashing huge fonts, colours orgy, etc. made my head hurt while reading this.
Perhaps some self-criticism about "pitching" the rant is due?

Same could go for some of the owner's presentations posted on this site.

Great post, Dave, as usual. Most entrepreneurs are so into their idea, into what they're creating that they sometimes lose focus on why they did it in the first place. It should be what can that solution do for a problem, using your own terms.

If the origin of that idea was not to solve anything, but was just "cool" and "nifty", I'm usually not interested. It's just tech show off. This happened way too much in the end 90s.

Yep. Most startups in the valley start with technology they find exciting, then look around and ask themselves, "Now, what can we do with this?" The answer to that backwards question becomes the "solution."

It's much less common to find a startup that first identifies a real-world need, performs a rigorous investigation to fully understand the relevant domain & users, then develops the idea and technology that will satisfy the need.

Canopy Financial helps businesses setup HSAs for their employees, has several hundred thousand paying customers, and is doing quite well financially. i expect it to be one of my best investments.

Mint has over 1M registered users, is the premier personal finance solution online, and has won numerous awards for helping people manage their finances.

SlideShare has over 10M unique visitors monthly around the world, and is the defacto standard for hosting online presentations. i as well as many many others use it to manage and embed my presentations, and various versions of my Startup Metrics ppts have been viewed by over 100,000 people.

in addition to just those 3, most of my other investments have raised downstream capital, and have paying customers. in other words, you're talking out of your ass my friend. i'll match my portfolio against anyone, from either a ROI or customer viability perspective.

Hey Dave, I've been irking other entrepreneurs by doing this for years myself. I have one more thing to add. Not only do I insist entrepreneurs explain the problem the address... I ask them to tell me EXACTLY who has it- job title, company name and type, budget (or demographic data for consumer start ups) and stories about how they've interacted with them and how that lead to the solution.

Yes.
Problem: For non-English-speaking web users, e.g. Japan, twenty percent of the Google/Yahoo SERP is in the wrong language. 20% of this prime SERP real estate is utter gibberish, a waste of text colored green. Billions of SERP views have had a 20% handicap, all along.

haha Dave,
i so have your style, won't deal with wasting time, more efficient to be dick, and i probably won't be so nice to point it out like you do here once i'm a vc.

and WTF, the last thing i am going to do is pitch my breakthrough in front of several hundred broken record (heart still goes out to you for trying) freetards when i can build a live prototype and let the results show a solution to your problem that makes you come to me (figuratively).

I love it! But the "Solution looking for a Problem" issue is part of a larger entrepreneur syndrome, which is to focus WAAAY too much on his or her own point of view, rather than on the user's (or better yet, the customer's).

Amen, Dave. Finding the problem is the first step to recognizing if you have a market. And most people have solutions to a market that does not exist because the problem is just so darn small. I'd love to see them connect emotionally with me on that sort of problem...alas.

I'll be forwarding this around. You can come be an asshole at an event in Maryland anytime you'd like.

20+ services are fetching your RSS feed out there and that's 19 too many. 99% of the time they won't get any content. 1% of the time, they're late, because you published that a few minutes ago. Also, they have problems parsing your feed (atom), because it is different from my feed(rss) and from any other out there.

The problem is that everybody is doing something stupid, while really, their should be only service doing it.