Ballard-to-West Seattle monorail proposal on November ballot

Posted by Danielle Anthony-Goodwin on August 4th, 2014

The latest in a long line of monorail proposals will go to Seattle voters this November. As reported by our news partners at The Seattle Times, Magnolia activist Elizabeth Campbell and her allies collected around 9,000 signatures, well more than the 4,582 signatures needed to send her Ballard-to-West Seattle monorail proposal to the ballot. As for why the signature threshold is much lower than for other initiatives:

It takes signatures from only 1 percent of registered voters to reach the ballot under the “city transportation districts” law from 2002, which the state Legislature passed to enable a populist monorail movement.

If approved, Proposition 2 would form the Century Transportation Authority (CenTran), a new government entity controlled by an independent board of directors, with the ability to put taxpayers on the hook for bond debt. The proposition would also institute a $5 car tab fee across the city, raising approximately $2 million per year for planning work for the 16-mile line.

According to the CenTran website, if the proposition is approved, “the newly created Authority will then create a master plan to design and engineer the elevated rail system, and will complete the required environmental review for Phase 1, leading to the construction of the elevated rail system.” The actual construction of the monorail line, which is estimated by CenTran to cost around $2.4 billion, would be funded by a separate ballot measure at a later date.

To read the full story from The Seattle Times’ Mike Lindblom, click here.

33 reader comments so far ↓

$2 million for studies? Didn’t we already spend a small fortune studying this? I’m all for public transit and think it’s sorely lacking in this town but I absolutely will vote against this for one simple reason: I see no reason to believe this will ever be built. Seattle has a simply amazing record of starting then stopping projects, wasting millions in the process. Until I see some sort of legislation that prohibits short-sighted voters from stopping work on projects already underway I plan to vote against ANYTHING requiring additional funding. Honestly, why does Seattle feel the need to vote on things over and over and over again? We’ve spent a decade voting on and debating transit in this town and have little to show for it. In that same time period other cities have gone out and built entire transit systems. Seattle really is proof that too much democracy can be a bad thing!

I, unfortunately, have to agree with SeaSpider. The monorail feasibility has been studied to death – approved 4 times by voters then ultimately killed by a 5th vote brought under questionble circumstances. Transit solutions should be built on need, an investment on the viability of the city itself, rather than the short-sighted penny pinching of voters, the majority of whom are just angry at “high taxes”, not the need to create a transit system that serves all communities equally. Stop asking us. Just DO it!

Ballard: always the bridesmaid, never the bride! Despite the recent surge in condo housing, which will only lead to MUCH more density by the time any transit corridor option would be completed. It’s never about solving the problem we have NOW, but the problem we’ll have 10-20 years from now. This is the problem with reliance on voter-funding. We don’t think past the next fill-up of the gas tank.

Studied to death? They even bought and resold the real estate the first time! They had the land between Ballard and downtown and now it is gone. The only thing that saved the taxpayers that time was land values going up between buying and selling. The people forced to sell their land might have been screwed though. Seriously, enough is enough! Elevated rail or a subway, OK. Monorail? No, not again!

Yes, we need better transit connections to downtown and beyond. No, I don’t think the current proposal is the answer. Integrated transport is the only way to go, not slapping on yet another mode that doesn’t play well with the others. With this proposal – to get to the airport from Ballard, you’d have to change at Seattle Center and again at Westlake. They should study some European cities and see how they’ve done it, because these ad hoc proposals aren’t the answer.

Seattle is nightmarishly overcrowded. The lightrail is slow and clunky. And only covers the eastside of the city. The westside needs to be cover also. You need some kind of bypass of the ballard bridge.
The monorail has been goinf back and forth for over 40 years, it needs to finally leave Seattle Center.

This design is steller! You certainly know how to keep a reader entertained.
Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Excellent job.
I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it.
Too cool!

Hey there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog.
Is it very difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very
techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about
setting up my own but I’m not sure where to begin. Do you have
any ideas or suggestions? Thanks

You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find
this matter to be really something which I think I would never understand.
It seems too complex and very broad for me. I am looking forward
for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

Hello there, just became alert to your blog through Google,
and found that it’s truly informative. I am going to watch out for brussels.
I will appreciate if you continue this in future.
Lots of people will be benefited from your writing.

Today, while I was at work, my cousin stole my
apple ipad and tested to see if it can survive
a forty foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now destroyed and she has 83 views.
I know this is completely off topic but I had to share it with someone!

Its like you learn my mind! You appear to know so much about this, such as you wrote the e book in it or something. I think that you simply can do with some % to pressure the message home a little bit, however other than that, this is excellent blog. A fantastic read. I will certainly be back.

Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn something like this before. So nice to search out any person with some authentic thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is wanted on the net, someone with somewhat originality. useful job for bringing one thing new to the internet!

Great goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff prior to and you are simply too wonderful. I actually like what you have received here, certainly like what you’re saying and the way in which you are saying it. You are making it enjoyable and you continue to care for to keep it wise. I can not wait to read much more from you. That is actually a great web site.

hi!,I love your writing very much! proportion we keep in touch more approximately your article on AOL? I need an expert in this house to solve my problem. May be that is you! Having a look forward to look you.

We are a bunch of volunteers and starting a brand new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with helpful info to paintings on. You have done an impressive task and our entire neighborhood shall be grateful to you.

Thanks for any other wonderful article. The place else may anybody get that kind of info in such an ideal approach of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I’m at the search for such information.