Wednesday, 29 May 2013

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

The launch of my new party Liberty GB has been noticed by Searchlight
magazine, which is linked to Hope not Hate and Unite Against Fascism.
Searchlight is essentially a communist front operation disguised as an
anti-fascist organisation. Its banner reads: “Fighting fascism and
racism internationally for nearly fifty years”.
In
the peculiar world view of communists, anyone who disagrees with them
is a fascist, and anyone who recognises that far-left extremists are
using mass immigration/ multiculturalism as physical and ideological
pawns to fracture traditional (and capitalist) Great Britain will be
smeared as a racist.

Searchlight’s Sonia Gable (wife of communist Gerry Gable) is most upset about Liberty GB. She stated the following in an article she called “Liberty It Isn’t”:

“Liberty GB’s politics are just more of the same old
fascist rubbish. Claiming it is ‘working together [with whom?] to
protect our British culture, heritage and freedoms’ it explains that:
‘the Liberal Democrats, Labour and Conservatives manifestly refuse to
discuss the most important issues of our time, namely mass Third World
immigration, the steady rise of fundamentalist Islam and the hijacking
of traditional British culture and institutions by well-organised
left-wing “progressives”‘. Enough said.”

This initiated a series of comments between us. Readers can decide as
to whether leftists like this are insane, evil, or just criminally
ignorant:
[PW = Paul Weston; SG = Sonia Gable]

PW:

Sonia, as an organisation claiming to fight against
racism and fascism, you would have my full support. I am viciously
attacked by the real far-right, and they are deeply unpleasant people.
However, you appear to have little concern about the plight of a
distinct racial group which is set to become an ethnic minority (below
the age of 30) in its own homeland at some point before 2050. I am
unsure as to whether you are driven by overt racism of the anti-white
variety here, or deeply held political views that wish to see
traditional Britain smashed and re-built along Communist lines.
May I ask you some questions? Do you believe that all
indigenous racial and religious groups, regardless of their skin colour,
have a right to their traditional culture, heritage and homeland? If
you consider for example, that some do and some do not, perhaps you
would care to explain why the English/British do not?

Would you also not agree that Communism is responsible for the murder
of over 100 million people, and that this sacrifice (if ends are to
justify means) was in vain, when one considers that rather than the
“Withering Away of the State” Communism (quite apart from allying itself
with Adolf Hitler in 1939) became notable for all-powerful State
controlled totalitarian dictatorships, which served only to bring about
complete social, moral, economic and environmental catastrophe?
As things stand, you appear to support near genocidal racism and
fascism — albeit Left-Wing Fascism — which rather goes against your
claim that Searchlight is opposed to racism and fascism. Perhaps you
would care to elaborate?

Monday, 27 May 2013

Hugh Fitzgerald at New
English Review asks an important question of Cameron et al, who refuse to
accept the reality of core Islam. Quote:

Cameron and Clegg and Teresa May and
others should be asked, publicly, to define ‘radicalization’ among Muslims. Is there a different Qur'an that the
‘radicals’ read? A different biography of Muhammad, the Perfect Man?

No, the radicals read exactly the same
Qur'an, the same Hadith, the same Sira. And the testimony of every defector
from Islam is always the same: Islam is violent, Islam is dangerous, Islam is
deceptive, Islam is based on an uncompromising division of the world between
Believer and Unbeliever and is obsessed with territory, with the further
division of Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, that is between the lands of where
Muslims rule and what, for now, are still the lands of the Infidels.

Those who know anything about Islamic expansionism will be aware the
Saudi-Arabian based Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) holds the
largest bloc vote within the UN, and that they are working hard (and
spending a lot of money) trying to stop any criticism of Islam in the
West.

The OIC, in accordance with sharia law, deems all criticism of Islam
to be invalid. It does not matter if it is true or untrue; the mere fact
that it is critical is simply not allowed. Period. The buzzword they
have come up with to negate our defence against their extremist ideology
is “Islamophobia” which of course means an irrational fear of Islam.

This is very clever. By utilising the word “Islamophobia” they manage
to pigeonhole any critics of Islam as being of a mentally questionable
equilibrium — which may not be true initially, but may well be the case
after a few years, simply because trying to make sense of this madness
must surely drive us slowly insane.

Friday, 24 May 2013

With the first jihadi murder of a British soldier on British soil,
the nation awoke this morning to a new Multicultural reality. Prime
Minister David Cameron, notably absent from the political scene whilst
thousands of young white girls were being raped and tortured by Muslim
paedophiles, suddenly discovered his inner Churchill and stated the following:

What happened yesterday in Woolwich has sickened us all.
On our televisions last night and in our newspapers this morning we have
all seen images that are deeply shocking. The people who did this were
trying to divide us. They should know something like this will only
bring us together and make us stronger… this country will be absolutely
resolute in its stand against violent extremism and terror. We will
never give in to terror or terrorism.”

From the seemingly trivial, like the renaming of Sandhurst’s Mons
Hall to the King Hamad Hall in exchange for a pimped mess of Bahraini
pottage, to matters of supreme importance, Britain appears to have
submitted to Islam. The double standards involved when it comes to
protecting Muslims or prosecuting/persecuting non-Muslims are on stark
display for all but the most ideologically blinkered to see. Britain is
now a country which has lost its collective sanity.

Wednesday, 22 May 2013

The following article was not written by me, nor do I know the name of the original author. It has been knocking around the internet for a long time now, but is re-posted here because what it says is so powerful, so pertinent to our catastrophic situation in the West, and so simply put.

I used to
know a man whose family were German aristocracy prior to World War II. They
owned a number of large industries and estates. I asked him how
many German people were true Nazis, and the answer he gave has stuck with me and
guided my attitude toward fanaticism ever since.

Tuesday, 21 May 2013

One of the bigger lies
promulgated by the liberal/left is that immigration is an absolute necessity if
we wish to expand our economy. This is simply not the case: immigration is
crippling us as a country. When one bears in mind we are already
technically bankrupt, then immigration is just hastening our final day of
economic reckoning.

In 1997 the population of Britain
was 58.4 million. In 2011 it was 62.6 million. These are official government
figures, and thus have little credibility because our politicians routinely lie
to us. Indigenous Brits are in demographic decline and an unknown number
emigrate every year. The last Labour government admitted they had no real idea how
many immigrants were here (nor illegal immigrants) but we can safely assume
there are many more foreigners than official figures suggest.

Monday, 20 May 2013

Britain is a very odd place these days. We are being subjected to what
amounts to a racial and cultural war against us, yet our politicians refuse to
talk about it, and the overwhelming majority of the indigenous population seem
too cowed and fearful to force the politicians to not just recognise the
problem, but to actually do something about it.

Consider the recent story regarding the rapist Mawawe Ibraham Karam and what it
tells you about the cultural and social fabric of England in 2012. Karam is an
illegal immigrant from Sudan who attacked and raped a drunken indigenous
English girl in Nottingham earlier this year. Despite the clear distress of the
girl, any number of passers-by ignored her predicament, as did local taxi
drivers.

Sunday, 19 May 2013

The West is made up of countries built around one basic and
incredibly important political ethos — they are all Liberal Democracies.
Unfortunately, these countries also share a more recent political
ideology which has come to be known as multiculturalism, a word invented
in the latter half of the 20th century to enforce our toleration —
indeed celebration — of all faiths, cultures and races.

Multiculturalism
sits at the pinnacle of Political Correctness (another expression
invented in the late 20th century) and is promoted in the post-Christian
West with a religious fervour. Multiculturalism trumps all in the PC
world. The working class, the homosexual, women in general but
particularly so feminist women — all bow before a political and
ideological supremacy invented to favour of a foreign race and a foreign
religion.

Friday, 17 May 2013

The British police are slightly less of a disgrace than they were a
couple of years ago. In the not-so-distant past there was little
reporting of native British girls being drugged, groomed, raped and
murdered by gangs of Muslim males in our towns and cities.

This
wall of silence was erected in the interests of “community cohesion,” a
modern verbal concept invented by our liberal elites who think it is
better that the indigenous population remain unaware of the horrifying
abuse carried out by British Muslims. This is understandable, because to
be aware might make even the most fluffy-headed of liberals question
the benefits of mass Muslim migration into the liberal democracy that
was once Great Britain.
That is one way of explaining their historical silence, I suppose.
The fact that Mohammed’s marriage to six-year-old Aisha was consummated
when she was only nine might also play a part in the whole sordid
affair, along with the fact that Muslim males consider Muslim females to
be second class-citizens — not to mention infidel females.

But now that the liberal silence has been broken, we appear to
suffering from an absolute epidemic of Muslim paedophilia and abuse.
Dewsbury, Leeds, Blackburn, Blackpool, Derby, Rochdale, Birmingham etc.
etc. all seem to have their very own Islamic
gang-rape-of-under-age-children-enclaves, with the recent additions of
Oxford and Glasgow. The ongoing benefits of multiculturalism we are
constantly being told to celebrate are certainly well-represented
geographically, it must be said.

Thursday, 16 May 2013

Segregate the Generations. In the course of a political argument,
an ancient old lady was told by her grandson that she came from a different
generation, to which she replied: “No, I come from a different
civilisation.”

Quite so. There is little point
in controlling the medium of Socialist education if the wisdom of the older
“reactionary” generations can still be passed down to the younger. In Africa,
the tribal elders are respected and listened to, but in Britain those over a
certain age are mocked at worst, or sidelined at best, because they come from a
pre-revolutionary era. Those born after 1970 come from the post-revolutionary
era, and never the twain shall meet. The educational and media establishments
are run in the main by the young or the very young, all soaked in Marxist
ideology, and their output is principally aimed only at the young. This is
deliberately done in order to ensure the segregation of those who could present
an alternative voice to their incessant and twisted Socialist propaganda.

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

The Marxist left/liberals have
now completed their Long March Through the Institutions. They claim the
varied lunatic policies they enacted were for the benefit of society, but can
this really be the case? When viewed through the prism of reality, much of
socialism’s ideology appears to have one aim and one aim only: the total
destruction of society. This is not an overreaction by any means — if societal
destruction was your bag, would you not carry out the following?

Destroy Industry. What is the difference between
booming Germany and bankrupt Britain? Simple: Germany manufactures and Britain
consumes — but this was not always the case. Britain once had a dominant
engineering and ship-building industry, and was Europe’s biggest manufacturer
of cars and motor-cycles. It was therefore essential to sabotage our industrial
base — our means of production — in order to destroy capitalist Britain.
Many Trades Union leaders of the 1950s through to the 1980s were Communists or
Communist sympathisers who organised strikes and “downed-tools” so successfully
that Britain’s industrial base went to the wall. Writing in the Spectator last year,
Douglas Eden outlined the infiltration of British Trades Unions, and how their
pro-Soviet ideology was tolerated by Labour Prime Ministers up until the
election in 1979 of Margaret Thatcher. Mrs. Thatcher, incidentally, is hated so
viscerally by the left/liberals because her defeat of the unions was perceived
to have ended the dream of International Communism.

Monday, 13 May 2013

“There is a revolution coming. It
will not be like the revolutions of the past. It will originate with the
individual and with culture, and will change the political structure only as
its final act. It will not require violence to succeed, and it cannot be
successfully resisted by violence. This is the revolution of the new
generation.”

— Charles Reich. “The Greening of
America.” 1970.

Every generation bemoans the
slippage of standards and the “going to the dogs” of society, but history shows
that civilisations and peoples really do collapse utterly. Some even become
extinct. Great Britain, needless to say, is no longer as great as it once was,
but has the degradation we see around us on a daily basis been caused by
well-intentioned liberal stupidity, or by brilliantly-planned leftist
malevolence?

Perhaps it is a mixture of both.
It has long been known that the hard Left wished to transform the traditional
Britain (and West) I was born into. Via a protracted campaign of brainwashing
and propaganda they were able to recruit well intentioned liberals into an
unknowing alliance. This was not particularly difficult, of course; liberals
are easily duped by propagandised platitudes and fall very easily into Lenin’s
denouncement of them as Useful Idiots.