Maybe I'm too old to have my thumb on the relevant spaces in the interwebs, but it seems like the video barely caused a buzz. Responses from Jezebel, Clutch, and Vibe were mainly negative, complaining about Minaj's use of animalistic imagery, neon colors and her less than creative wordplay. Black feminists offered mainly negative critique for obvious and perfectly legitimate reasons. Minaj's challenge to "stupid hoes" included a reference to "nappy-headed hoes" and images of a pale, plastic, Venus Hottentot Barbie.

Me? Minaj hurts my head. She perplexes me. I think of her as Trickster, two-faced in her betrayal of global black feminist possibility and powerful in her contradictory elucidation of black woman's power within the realms of celebrity and hip hop. Reading her as Ellegua, that frightful guardian of the crossroads and the in-between and the everything-that-is-not-yet seems to fit an artist who switches alter egos as easily as she switches clothes. Conjuring the ritual and physicality of possession seems to fit a celebrity who changes clothes as she changes personality, putting on her and taking off her tropes as each personality comes down. The sometimes garish, sometimes delightful carnival of color, glitter and expression–even the repetitive dancehall/house music refrain–also fit a woman whose aesthetic choices continually find their footing in her Trinidadian roots.

In other words, I think of Nicki Minaj as diasporic black, as radical, and as speculative.

A black gyrl can't walk out the house these days without falling into one of these boxes. Hell, with Oscar season on top of us, we've seen all of these stereotypes appear in the media, one right after the other, at one point or another, just over the last few weeks.

But I'd argue we've never seen anything like Nicki Minaj–or at least nothing like Minaj and her alters. What she represents, yes even in all of her problematics and misogyny, what she represents is a black gyrl who has chosen. She knows she can't walk out the house without falling into one of several boxes. Which is fine by her because she has a walk-in closet full of handcrafted masks, carved, of course, in the raw material caking the bottom of our worst stereotypes (let's not be wasteful, yall). And she has decorated and bedazzled and glitter-taped them all and those masks are no longer theirs or yours but her own. And she doesn't walk out of the house; oh no. She skips or saunters or "twerks and spins away" according to whichever personality she has decided to put on her head.

I think this is why, in an epic conversation on Twitter with (Kima) @sweat_btwn, (Summer) @fecundmellow, @zero317, @AfroFuturAffair, and (Treva Lindsey) @divafeminist (the conversation, Storified here in full by @sweat_btwn, read away), I suggested Minaj could be read as afrofuturistic. The conversation that ensued was amazing and hinged on clarifying and articulating what afrofuturism is.

For some of us, to be afrofuturistic meant more than aesthetics or appearance. It meant contributing to a specific political project part of whose purpose was, inKima'swords:

Octavia Butler was the patron of this powerful vision, key being her ability to articulate the potential of the beyond–and its dangers. And the ability to imagine and move beyond this world, into other realms, was crucial.

For others, the aesthetics actually were of importance, as was the potential for Minaj to inspire a particular vision, and the right of readers/viewers/fans to use Minaj's project as inspiration for their own afrofuturescapes. As @AfroFuturistAffair noted:

"…it is political but it is also aesthetics and imagery. she may fit in that sense…"

The conversation lasted for hours, with people coming in and out. And I hope it continues.

Because I think I'm on the fence now as to whether Minaj is afrofuturistic. That afrofuturism must be beyond-this-world is valid as shit. Whether that means into outer space or into the underworld, to be afrofuturistic means being self-aware about what the next day or days will hold–even if the next day or days will be the end of days. To the extent that Minaj or her alters have a specific gaze toward the future is questionable.

But the underlying assumption behind this definition of afrofuturism is that time is linear and revelatory. It speaks to a conception of time that is Anglo-black in its ideal and Judeo-Islamic-Christian in its eloquence. Time soon come. Time will be here. The time is now.

What if the underlying assumption behind this definition of afrofuturism was challenged? What if, instead of black life and thought (and future) existing in time and on straight, if intersecting, lines–what if it curved? Webbed? What if you wore time on your person so that instead of the time is now, time IS now, and then, and later. What if the moment you are living here is being written of as the moment that will happen and the moment you are just past?

I opened the Storify by saying I see Minaj and moments like these as an afrofuturista. I do. But I'm also a radical womyn of color who sees the future through the lens of Afrolatinidad. Latinidad has less room for linear time in its conception of the future. Infused with indigenous elements, the future is happening now and has happened already. Speculative latinidad, in some ways, is about the inability of being able to call the future what it is, or send the past back. So that something like "Long Time Ago" by Leslie Marmon Silko (poet and author of Laguno, Pueblo, Mexican, white descent) can resonate as cautionary, prophetic and preemptive all at once:

While speculative latinidad is often placed in the category of magical realism, I wonder if it is also futurist. I wonder if it's just that speculative/futurist latinidad imaginings are as much about the past as they are about the future. And if that's the case, and if afrofuturist imaginings are as much about the future as they are about the present, I wonder what Afrolatinidad looks like?

In other words, preoccupied with the slaveholding past and concerned about the racialized future, does an afrofuturist latinidad live at the crossroads between magical realist latinidad and the Afrofuture?*

Engaging with Minaj (and for my black-Puerto Rican, Chicago house music self, this also means engaging with the Caribbean characteristics in her work) forces me to consider ways afrofuturism can include magical realist latinidad and vice versa. Earlier I said I was on the fence on whether Minaj is afrofuturistic. Why? Because she is still very much about, as Summer noted, a hyperhyperpresent, her caricatures being as much about mirroring our own stereotypes as they are about her self-representation. Hottentot Venus Barbie aside, she also does not seem to be concerned with reevaluating the past-as-prophecy (unless in the Story of Female Emcees Past). In other words, she is espousing neither a dream nor a nightmare of the future.

But what if she isn't supposed to be the vision?

What if she is just the oracle? The vessel? A portent of things to come?

What if she is just the keeper of the crossroads?

She may be what lives at the crossroads between magical realist latinidad and the Afrofuture. Well, mira, not her (praise Gawd). But oracle work, scrying, divination. All making the act of and attempt to see the future just as important as the past-future seen. The moment in the present before the past and future separate and becomes siblings as #relevant.

What if at the heart of an afrofuturist latinidad/futurist afrolatinidad is good, ole Second Sight? And #Obatala?

*Which of course is a project to superimpose ON TOP of pushing latinidad itself to include its own black and African elements.