THE LA RAZA CRIME TIDAL WAVE - “These figures do not attempt to allege that foreign
nationals in the country illegally commit more
crimes than other groups,” the report states. “It
simply identifies thousands of crimes that should
not have occurred and thousands of victims that
should not have been victimized because the
perpetrator should not be here.”
CHARLOTTE CUTHBERTSON

The call to abolish ICE is repeated over and over again in American politics. This mantra is likely to be repeated with even greater frequency and intensity as the race for the Democrats’ presidential nomination heats up.

But what does ICE actually do?

A quick look at some of their actions from the past few weeks reveals the agency to be an unambiguous force for good.

The street value of that much cocaine is north of one billion dollars. Though opioids have been getting almost all the attention whenever our country’s drug epidemic is discussed, thousands are killed by cocaine every year, too. The number is climbing as well. The Washington Post notes that, “Overdose deaths from cocaine increased by about 18 percent each year during the five-year [2011-2016] period.”

The man in question, Houcine Ghoul, was a strong supporter of ISIS, and believed in violently imposing Islam worldwide. In their press release on the matter, ICE gives this background to his case:

The investigation into Ghoul’s conduct began in April 2014 when Ghoul posted a photo online that explicitly displayed support for the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), a designated foreign terrorist organization. This photo displayed an individual holding a sign with the Arabic phrase, “The victory of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,” and then below in English, “ISIS,” and “N. Carolina, USA,” the state where Ghoul was then residing. The photo later appeared in an online propaganda video posted by others to display worldwide support for ISIS. Though he did not use his actual name or identity for the online accounts, Ghoul provided a self-description within the account, “Extremist, terrorist, tough, brain-washed, radical, I love explosions, booby trapping, beheading the enemy, and am among the supporters of establishing the religion with the sword.”

Later, when Mr. Ghoul applied to become an American citizen, he lied and claimed to have never been affiliated with a terrorist government or advocated the overthrow of a government. Now, he’s one less threat to worry about.

ICE targets the worst of the worst, and notes that while all were in the country illegally, the arrest records of this bunch also included, "assault, battery, domestic violence, traffic offenses, driving under the influence, drug possession, drug trafficking, larceny, illegal re-entry after deportation, illegal entry, resisting officers, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.”

Looking over the details of this action also reveals how porous our southern border really is. Quite of a few of these criminals had been arrested and deported years ago. For example, one 25-year-old Honduran who had a prior conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon had been deported before. Now that he has been apprehended, he faces “federal prosecution for re-entry after deportation.” Another arrestee, a 32-year old Mexican had also been deported before. This guy is an active gang member with prior convictions for robbery, evading arrest, and aggravated assault.

Here again, we see how ICE only targets active criminals -- often of the most despicable sort. They make this as clear as can be:

ICE deportation officers carry out targeted enforcement operations daily nationwide as part of the agency’s ongoing efforts to protect the nation, uphold public safety, and protect the integrity of our immigration laws and border controls…. During targeted enforcement operations, ICE officers frequently encounter other aliens illegally present in the United States. These aliens are evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and, when appropriate, they are arrested by ICE officers.

The rap sheet of this round-up included, “drug possession, assault, dangerous drugs, illegal entry, larceny, marijuana possession, possessing a weapon, failure to identify and identity theft.” The most monstrous of them all being a Honduran man wanted for the rape of a minor.

So when politicians say they want to abolish ICE, are they saying America should give these people citizenship and leave them alone?

Another case of a horrendous human being committing crimes in the US after having been deported. This man, José Ramón Aguilar-Moreno, had been sent back to El Salvador in 2003 after he was convicted of sexually abusing a child. But he came back and started posting child pornography to Facebook. He got busted and now faces up to 80 years in prison.

When Kamala Harris says she wants to abolish ICE, is she hoping for the support of men like this?

In 2016, Michael Cerdas Molina was convicted of sexual assault against a minor in his native Costa Rica. He tried to dodge prison time by hiding out in the US. But now ICE has busted him, and he will complete his sentence in his homeland.

The prior convictions of this group is enough to give you goosebumps: “three counts of murder, two counts of rape, two counts of aggravated assault, five counts of aggravated assault with a weapon, two counts of assault, sexual assault, three counts of attempted murder, burglary, child abuse, lewd act on a minor, driving under the influence, larceny, stolen property, two counts of firearm possession, two weapon offenses, traffic offence, forgery, three counts of robbery, resisting arrest, auto theft, and seven drug convictions.”

Now each and every one of them is back in Cambodia where they came from, and headed for prison, where they belong.

Supporters of terrorism, drug-peddlers, murderers, rapists, child pornographers, and violent criminals. These are just some of the terrible people ICE has rid us of in just the last three weeks.

ICE shouldn’t be abolished; it should be expanded.

FROSTY WOOLDRIGE

DOUBLING AMERICA’S POPULATION: A
tragedy in the making!

Do you want your children to face the ominous ecological,
sociological and cultural clashes they will encounter with an added 50 million
legal immigrants? Do you want your kids to face 100 different languages in your
schools? In Denver, my city, we must contend with 173 different languages
in our classrooms. Do you want to pay ever-increasing amounts of your
taxes toward housing, feeding, medicating, educating and caring for 50 million
foreign-born immigrants who lack any qualifications, any cultural affinity,
and/or any educational abilities to contribute to our first world economy and
society?

If you think the future will be pretty for your kids, just look at
what’s happening in Detroit-istan, Minneapolis-istan, Miami-istan, Los
Angeles-Mexico or the murder capital of America—Chicago. If you think the
60,000 plus homeless living in tent cities in Los Angeles and 11,000 homeless
in San Francisco can’t be solved, how do you think we will solve millions of
immigrants from Africa, Indochina, India, Mexico and heaven knows whereelse in the world?

This policy of flooding the market
with cheap, foreign, white-collar graduates and
blue-collar labor also shifts
enormous wealth from young employees
towards older investors, even as it also widens wealth gaps, reduces high-tech
investment, increases state and
local tax burdens, and hurts children’s schools and college educations.
It also pushes Americans
away from high-tech careers and sidelines millions of marginalized Americans,
including many who are now struggling with
fentanyl addictions. The labor policy also moves business investment and
wealth from the heartland to the coastal
cities, explodes rents and housing
costs, shrivels real estate
values in the Midwest, and rewards investors for creating low-tech, labor-intensive workplaces.
JOHN BINDER

GAVIN NEWSOM HEADS
TO EL SALVADOR TO AID THE SALVADORIAN INVASION OF THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA… It’s your Democrat Politician at work… FOR ILLEGALS!

Last year in fact, that game was going full speed. El
Salvador's remittances hit arecord $5.47 billion.
Literally one out of six Salvadorans
now lives in the U.S., and 680,000 of those make their home in
benefit-rich California. Salvadoran politicians actually campaign for
office in California, owing to the sizable number of Salvadoran voters, many of
whom are here illegally., signaling that there's a lot of work to be had for
the newest (and least likely to be legal) migrants in the states now, most of
which is coming from California.

*

Here come Big Daddy, the California governor, the
gringo who's already laid out a banquet of goodies for Salvadorans
in California, from free health care to free education, to sanctuary state
protections to enable illegals to work, coming there supposedly to find
out how he can offer ... even more goodies to Salvador's uneducated
lower middle classes. The idea of course is to get even more of them to
come over. Big Daddy comes down with the Santa sack full of goodies. MONICA
SHOWALTER

Elizabeth Warren: Crossing the Border Illegally Should Not Be a Criminal Offense

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) does not believe it should be a criminal offense to cross the border illegally, she said during an interview with the California Nation podcast, which was posted Monday.

While the presidential candidate hit a number of issues during the broad discussion, Section 1325 of the immigration code, which makes it a criminal offense for people to cross the border illegally, became a highlight.

“Are you in favor of repealing that?” she was asked.

“I am,” Warren said, arguing that “criminalizing” illegal entry does not make people safer.

“I think that the whole notion of criminalizing the approach to coming across the border without documentation is not making anybody any safer. We just need to be in a different position on this,” she said, downplaying the number of criminals and drug traffickers who take advantage of the porous border.

“It’s really important on immigration that we concentrate our resources on the people who pose threats to us, and that’s not children,” she continued.

“It’s not mamas fleeing terror from gangs down in Central America. It’s not people trying to build a life who have family here,” she added:

Recent U.S. Customs and Border Protection data revealed that two caravans that arrived at the U.S.-Mexico border, in October 2018 and January 2019, included “1,520 previously deported illegal aliens who had been convicted of crimes in the U.S.,” Breitbart News reported.

Of those:

Four were convicted of murder

Nearly 30 were convicted of sex crimes

More than 60 had been convicted for assault or aggravated assault with a deadly weapon

Two were convicted of violence against law enforcement officials

That data only reflects the illegal aliens from those two caravans alone.

There are countless stories of illegal alien crime, although many of the stories are largely ignored by the establishment media.

In January, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested more than 100 immigration violators in New York. The vast majority of the illegal aliens were convicted criminals.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) made 188 arrests from January 14-18. Of those arrested, 107 were convicted criminals or facing charges, and 55 failed to leave the country after a final order of removal or were previously removed and returned to the U.S.

The following month, a story emerged of an illegal alien mother of nine, Celia Ruiz-Ochoa, who ran a massive drug trafficking ring after settling in the states and passed it down to her son in 2016. She is serving 17 years in federal prison:

Federal authorities say Ruiz-Ochoa often trafficked the drugs into the U.S. by air and by land. She was so successful that she rose to the top of an international drug trafficking ring which contributed to the opioid crisis in Ohio, WCPO reported Thursday.

Additionally, the majority of working-class Americans say current immigration policies are driving up crime in the U.S.

The latest Gallup survey finds that among Americans with less than a college degree, more than one-in-two, or 51 percent, said immigration to the U.S. has made crime across the country worse. About 41 percent said immigration has not had much impact on crime, and only seven percent said immigration has decreased crime.

Overall, more Americans say immigration is driving up crime than those who say immigration is decreasing crime. About 42 percent of Americans said immigration makes crime worse, while about 50 percent said immigration has no impact on crime. Only seven percent of Americans believe immigration decreases crime.

The “criminal offense” topic bubbled up during the recent Democrat debate, with former HUD Secretary Julián Castro (D) hitting Beto O’Rourke (D) over his purported support of Section 1325.

“Let’s be very clear. The reason that they’re separating these little children from their families is that they’re using Section 1325 of that act, which criminalizes coming across the border to incarcerate the parents and then separate them,” Castro said on the debate stage.

“Some of us on this stage have called to end that section, to terminate it. Some, like Congressman O’Rourke, have not,” he continued. “And I want to challenge all of the candidates to do that.”

Voters can add Warren – a top tier Democrat candidate – to the list of candidates who support decriminalizing illegal entry into the United States.

"Chuck
Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, the twin nutters of Congress, were certain they could
beat Trump at his own game, but have made fools of themselves, as
usual. The stand-off is not over but with each passing day, the
Democrats reveal more of their anti-American, pro-illegal immigration agenda.
Conservatives have been sounding the alarm for years: Democrats do not
care about American citizens!" PATRICIA McCARTHY

By
Eddie Scarry Washington Examiner, May 23, 2019

2020 Democrats all have the same immigration
position: Open borders

Other than offering
some vague nods to “border security,” Democrats never put forth any policy that
would prevent the hundreds of thousands of unknown people streaming into the
U.S. Yet if you point out that the party doesn't care about securing the
border, a confounded news anchor will insist, “Silly fool! Why, everyone
supports border security!”

It’s a cover-up for
what Democrats truly believe in: An open border that discriminates against no
one from anywhere.

Look at any one of the
Democrats running for the party’s presidential nomination, and you will not
find a single policy proposal that would stop a single illegal entrant. Or even
just the top five of them in the RealClearPolitics national average.

Former Vice President
Joe Biden’s plan on his website: “We have got to
address the root causes of migration that push people to leave behind their
homes and everything they know to undertake a dangerous journey for the chance
at a better life." It says nothing about halting the obscene numbers of
migrants showing up at the border with bogus claims for asylum or the illegal
border crossers with histories of child sex abuse and violent gang affiliations caught daily. Ah,
but it does check the empty “secure our border and enforce our laws” banality.

Vermont Sen. Bernie
Sanders calls for expanding protections for illegal immigrants already in the
U.S., “developing a humane policy for those seeking asylum," and virtually
eliminating the deportation and detention of illegal aliens altogether.
Sanders’ website doesn’t even bother nodding to the “border security” cliché.

Massachusetts Sen.
Elizabeth Warren doesn’t mention immigration at all on her website. But in
interviews, she says the same nothing that every Democrat says. “We need an
immigration system that is effective, that focuses on where problems are,” she
said Wednesday on CNN, though Democrats never seem to find “where the problems
are” when talking about the topic. They deny that even one illegal immigrant
might be a rapist or drug dealer, even though there are scores of them. They
deny that there’s a “crisis” at the border, where five children have died in
recent weeks. They deny that illegal immigrants soak up welfare benefits (even
though they do). So where exactly are the “problems”? Warren said in the
interview that “we need immigration laws that focus on people who pose a real
threat,” but how exactly do Democrats define “real threat”? They apparently see
no threat, otherwise they wouldn’t oppose the construction of a border wall
with the fury of a volcano god.

California Sen. Kamala
Harris has compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the Ku Klux Klan,
called on Senate Democrats to resist funding any measure or resource on the
border that functions to apprehend and detain illegal border crossers, and made
protections for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients among her top
issues. I think we know where she stands on “border security.”

South Bend, Ind., Mayor
Pete Buttigieg finally got some policy positions on his website and he proposes
“immigration laws to reflect today’s humanitarian and economic needs” as well
as “reasonable security measures at the border.” Well, I feel better now, how
about you? Last month, Buttigieg said he would be happy to welcome an infinite number of immigrants, legal
or not, to his city, where he thought they would contribute to the snowplowing
and need for more firefighters. Aw, shucks! Is that what the tiny Guatemalan
woman who arrived at the Texas border with seven children wanted to do all
along? Why didn’t they say so? Hand them each a helmet and hose!

The 2020 Democrats,
with the media’s help, will either avoid the immigration issue as long as
possible, or keep repeating “border security, border security, border security”
in hopes that no one notices what they’re really after: Open borders and
unabated immigration.

The murder of legal immigrant and Newman
Police Corporal Ronil Singh on Christmas
night by an illegal alien in the sanctuary state of California shows
not only that the claims by Chuck Schumer and the “bride of Chucky”
Nancy Pelosi that

the Democrats support border
security is a deadly and bald-faced lie.

California became a Democratic
stronghold not because Californians became socialists, but because
millions of socialists moved there. Immigration turned
California blue, and immigration is ultimately to blame for California's
high poverty level.

Pelosi’s Pacific Heights
needs refugees

Pacific
Heights is one of San Francisco’s most expensive neighborhoods. It boasts
dramatic views of the Golden Gate Bridge, the Marin Headlands, and the blue
waters of San Francisco Bay.

Oracle
founder Larry Ellison is one of its more prominent and distinguished residents,
as is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

For
all its attractiveness as a neighborhood with its boutique shops and upscale
restaurants, Pacific Heights lacks two vital ingredients to make it a truly
great American neighborhood -- economic and cultural diversity.

That’s
why President Donald Trump’s plan to resettle “refugees” in sanctuary cities
should be embraced by Pacific Heights’ residents.

By
inviting the refugees now stranded at the border, Pacific Heights would not
only strengthen the sinew of its community but also contribute to alleviating
the humanitarian crisis at the border.

Our
strength is our diversity, and Pacific Heights lacks that strength. It is
culturally homogenous in a city that is diverse.

In
San Francisco, earning $117,000 a year or less makes you a
low-income earner. Placing refugees in Pacific Heights
where housing and other costs are truly astronomical would require the
compassion and economic assistance of its residents. The former they have long
signaled, and the latter they are more than able to do.

Nancy
Pelosi lives in
a walled mansion on a large expanse of land with
majestic views. Her mansion could easily house thirty or forty refugee
families, and she is hardly there. The expansive grounds could house dozens of
refugee families in tents.

Imagine
refugee children who survived the arduous and life-threatening journey from
Central America playing on Pelosi’s lawn while breathing the clean and
invigorating air from off the San Francisco coastlin­­e. Imagine alleviating
the humanitarian crisis by creating additional tent cities in Pacific Heights’
splendid parks.

Pelosi, through her holdings in local restaurants
and vineyards, is reputed to be one of the largest
employers of illegal labor in Northern California.
Consequently, the people she would compassionately house might be able to find
work in her network of businesses, especially her fabled
vineyard on the banks of the Napa River.

Pelosi
also owns a second mansion in the Wine Country north of San Francisco. This too
is walled and could hold dozens of refugee families.

Neither
Pelosi herself nor the community of Pacific Heights can solve the refugee
problem, but they could set a standard that other wealthy and pro-sanctuary
communities could easily emulate.

Just
a few miles away from Pacific Heights, my liberal acquaintances “Ann” and
“Christopher” live in a complex that is more difficult to enter than the
Central Intelligence Agency. They both support the sanctuary status of San
Francisco and think the border wall, but not their complex’s barrier, is
immoral. Ann is a big DACA supporter although she has been seen adroitly
ignoring and bypassing the homeless that proliferate in her neighborhood and
sleep on her streets. Her compassion obviously has its limits.

Their
complex boasts extensive patios between the stacks of apartments. These could
host a dozen or more tents and port-a-potties that could alleviate the cagelike
situations at the border that they lament as deplorable. Although these
facilities would constitute an eyesore and block the light and view Ann and
Christopher currently enjoy, creating a tent community for refugees would
demonstrate the concern and compassion that people like Ann and Christopher
love to remind the rest of us that they possess.

Real
compassion in Western Civilization derives from the Biblical sense of the term
and means to share in the suffering and emotions of others. When Jesus saw his
friends weeping at the grave of Lazarus, He wept with them and acted.
Compassion means to suffer with and to be motivated to take immediate action to
alleviate the suffering of others.

So,
let the virtue-signaling liberals in sanctuary cities who incessantly lecture
us on their commitment to taking in everyone, liberals who find the rest of us
insensitive and heartless, let them manifest in deed the compassion they so
relentlessly embrace in word. Let them fulfill the Biblical imperative to
suffer with and take immediate action.

And
they will be rewarded for this in knowing that their upscale white communities
can find new strength in the economic and cultural diversity that the refugees
will provide. I am looking forward to the sprouting of tent cities in Pacific
Heights and elsewhere in the upscale parts of San Francisco. Diversity is truly
a community’s strength.

Abraham H. Miller is an emeritus
professor of political science, University of Cincinnati and a distinguished
fellow with the Hyam Salomon Center

In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was
increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the
increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make
Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's.

Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed,
Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an
"economic development credit in American Samoa".

Conservative activist Laura Loomer, who is known for going undercover
with James O'Keefe, took alleged illegal aliens from Mexico and Guatemala to
Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home in California. There, the group jumped the fence
and Loomer demanded the group be let into the home. The group set up a pop up
tent with the word "morality" on it and hung the pictures of those
who were killed by illegal aliens, The Daily Caller reported.

When talking about
immigration, Democrats like to conflate illegal and legal immigration, dropping
the word “illegal” and spouting meaningless babble about no human being
illegal. They like to preach that illegal immigrants commit crimes at a
lower rate than American citizens, a factoid that has been exposed as a
lie.

The murder of legal immigrant and Newman Police Corporal Ronil Singh on
Christmas night by an illegal alien in the sanctuary state of California shows
not only that the claims by Chuck Schumer and the “bride of Chucky” Nancy
Pelosi that the Democrats support border security is a deadly and bald-faced
lie. It
highlights the difference between legal and illegal immigrants, between those
who love America and want to be Americans and those who murder them.

Ronil Singh came to the
U.S. from his native Fiji to fulfill a lifelong dream of becoming an officer,
joining a small-town police force in California and working to improve his
English. The day after Christmas, he stopped another immigrant, this one in the
country illegally, who shot and killed the corporal, authorities said Thursday…

"This suspect is in
our country illegally. He doesn't belong here. He is a criminal,"
Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson, whose agency is leading the investigation,
told reporters.

Newman Police Chief Randy
Richardson fought back tears as he described Singh, a 33-year-old with a
newborn son, as an "American patriot."

"He came to America
with one purpose, and that was to serve this country," Richardson said…

"He was living the
American dream," said Stanislaus County Sheriff's Deputy Royjinder Singh,
who is not related to the slain officer but knew him. "He loved camping,
loved hunting, loved fishing, loved his family."

And now he is dead. The
blood of Kate Steinle, Mollie Tibbetts, and
now Ronil Singh and others is on the hands of open border advocates and the
sanctuary city loons who provide no sanctuary for the American citizen victims
of illegal alien criminals.

Even if it were true that
illegal aliens commit crimes, including murder, at rates lower than American
citizens, that would be irrelevant. The murder rate for illegal aliens should
be zero because none of them should be here and the indisputable fact is that
Jamiel Shaw Jr., Kate Steinle, and Mollie Tibbetts would be alive today if the
illegal aliens who slew them were still staring at the other side of a border
wall liberals refuse to build.

And Nancy Pelosi has a wall
around the backyard at her home in San Francisco.

What is immoral is a policy endorsed by Pelosi and Schumer of
sanctuary cities and even states that allows such criminal aliens in our
country to murder Americans and a Democratic caucus that would abolish I.C.E.
and those who risk their lives daily to provide some semblance of border
security.
What is immoral is politicians such as Oakland Mayor Libby
Schaaf not only refusing to cooperate with I.C.E. butgiving illegal aliens a heads-up when
I.C.E. raids are imminent.

In the wake of the Singh
murder, Schaaf still insists that warning illegal aliens about I.C.E. raids was
and is the right thing to do, the lives of American citizens she is sworn to
protect be damned:

Oakland Mayor Libby
Schaaf -- who once warned Northern California residents about an impending ICE
raid -- said she has “no regrets” for her actions and said the federal immigration
agency “has gone astray.”

“I have no regrets, none.
The more time goes by, the more certain I feel that I did the right thing in
standing up for our community and pointing out our values are not aligned with
our laws,” Schaff toldBuzzFeed in an interview. “That’s hopefully the
message that is sent out.”

The father of an
8-year-old Guatemalan boy who died in U.S. custody took his son to the border
after hearing rumors that parents and their children would be allowed to
migrate to the United States and escape the poverty in their homeland, the
boy's stepsister told the Associated Press.

Felipe Gomez Alonzo died
Monday at a New Mexico hospital after suffering coughing, vomiting and fever,
authorities said. It was the second such death this month. Another Guatemalan
child, 7-year-old Jakelin Caal, died in U.S. custody on Dec. 8.

The fact is that if we
had a wall, or whatever the hair-splitters want to call it, both these children
would be alive today. And it is American kids are dying too, killed and
murdered by illegal aliens who have no right to be here. Just ask the parents
of Justin Lee, 14, who was killed in a hit-and-run
accident by an illegal alien:

An illegal immigrant has
pleaded guilty to a hit and run that killed a Wixom teen in June.

Miguel Ibarra-Cerda, 22,
entered his plea Thursday, the day his trial was set to begin before Judge
Cheryl Matthews in Oakland County Circuit Court.

Ibarra-Cerda is charged
with failing to stop at the scene of an accident when at fault, resulting in
death, and reckless driving causing death for the collision which killed Justin
Lee, 14. Ibarra-Cerda faces up to 15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine for the
first charge and 15 years in prison and a $2,500-$10,000 fine on the second
charge. Matthews will sentence him Dec. 20.

Police in Connecticut
have arrested an 18-year-old undocumented immigrant from Jamaica on murder
charges related to the shooting death of an innocent 12-year-old boy a week
before Christmas.

Bridgeport Police Chief
Armando Perez on Monday announced the charges against Tajay Chambers stemming
from the December 18 death of Clinton Howell outside his family's home on
Willow Street.

Chambers has been charged
with murder; murder with special circumstances; use of a firearm during the
commission of a felony; illegal possession of a firearm without a permit; risk
of injury to a child; reckless endangerment, and larceny….

CTpost.com reported, citing
police sources, that earlier that evening, Chambers and his alleged
co-conspirators were driving in a stolen car when they got into an argument
with some people walking along Willow Street, among them Howell’s relative.

The wall would in fact
pay for itself, if only in the reduced cost of crimes that would be eliminated,
saving both dollars from overburdened social services and the cost of illegal
alien crimes, particularly the cost in human lives such as that of Ronil Singh,
who is survived by his wife and young son.

His death, the death of a
legal immigrant pursuing the American dream, and countless other American
citizens, including children, is on the hands of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck
Schumer. Perhaps Pelosi can attend Singh’s funeral and explain how his death
and the deaths of others in the absence of a wall is all President Trump’s
fault and that not building the wall is the moral thing to do.

Daniel
John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared inInvestor’s Business Daily, Human
Events, Reason Magazine and the ChicagoSun-Times among
other publications.

"The public schools
indoctrinate their young charges to hate this country and the rule of
law. Illegal aliens continue overwhelming the state, draining
California’s already depleted public services while endangering our lives,
the rule of law, and public safety for all citizens."

"America’s elites,
now overwhelmingly represented by the Democratic Party, have a single overriding
interest: their self-indulgent lifestyle."

Class Conflict within the
Democratic Party

Over
many decades, the American Left, the Democratic Party and their mutual
propaganda arm, the self-styled “mainstream media,” have successfully portrayed
conservatives and the Republican Party as a coalition of the wealthy and
intolerant. Further, the Democrats and the left have claimed that they
are the true champions of the working or middle class as they unceasingly fight
to defeat and marginalize this evil menace.

The
reality, however, is that this cabal has virtually no interest in defending or
aiding the working class as they are, in fact, the party of a bifurcated
constituency: the wealthy and those dependent on the largess of the government.

Of
the fifty wealthiest congressional districts throughout the country, the
Democrats now represent
forty-one. Of the remaining nine
represented by Republicans, three are in Texas, the only red state on the list
of fifty districts. Not coincidentally the residents of these same fifty
districts are supposedly among the most well-educated and sophisticated.
This transformative process is not a recent phenomenon as the trend began
in the 1980’s and accelerated rapidly in the early 2000’s.

America’s
elites, now overwhelmingly represented by the Democratic Party, have a single
overriding interest: their self-indulgent lifestyle. This is manifested
in their mistaken belief that conservatives (i.e. the “right”) are hell bent on
enforcing their version of morality on the nation, thus potentially calling
into question the lifestyles of the rich and solipsistic.

The
veracity of this claim is immaterial as it would require an element of
deliberation not emotion -- a trait in extremely short supply among the
nation’s privileged class, nearly all of whom have difficulty in generating an
original thought due to the ill-education rampant in America’s
universities. Thus, the mindless accusations of racism, misogyny and
Fascism directed at the conservative rubes in middle America are acceptable,
and in far too many instances believed, particularly as many had the temerity
to vote for Donald Trump – who, although wealthy and Ivy League educated, is
considered the ultimate unsophisticated rube.

As
conservatives are the dominant force in the Republican Party and this nation
cannot function politically with more than two major political parties, the
alternative is the Democratic Party. An entity dominated by the American
Left, an assemblage whose core philosophy is antithetical to the interests of
the wealthy and privileged. Yet, determined to protect their lifestyles
and vilify conservatives, they willingly ally with the left and overwhelmingly
support virtually any Democratic candidate. In the recent 2018 mid-terms,
Democratic House candidates outspent their Republican opponents by a two to one
margin thanks primarily to this wealthy but myopic assemblage.

Their
colleagues in the Democratic Party, and the preponderance of the membership,
are those dependent on the largess of the federal and state governments.
On the other hand, the growing segment of the citizenry who are working and
self-sufficient are increasingly joining those who believe in limited
government in migrating to the Republican Party-- a process that is
accelerating with the policies and tactics of Donald Trump in combating the
entrenched left and their determination to culturally and economically
transform the nation. The Republican Party will inevitably become the
party of the working or middle class. As such, they could potentially
dominate the political agenda for the foreseeable future.

The
left and the Democratic Party, in order to offset this possibility, must
aggressively seek to increase the number of dependents by promoting the
legalization and ultimate citizenship for untold millions of illegal immigrants
and promising all Americans cradle to grave economic security. In order
to enact this strategy to defeat the Republicans, the left must have the active
participation and financial support of the nation’s wealthy-- which they
have.

The
Democratic Party has evolved into essentially an incompatible two-tier
class-driven entity encompassing the nation’s wealthiest and the nation’s
poorest. Nonetheless, it is at present a convenient home for the elites
to hold off the imaginary horde of conservatives outside their gilded
doors.

However,
the voting numbers within the party are overwhelmingly with those who generally
support the leftist philosophies of redistribution (e.g. socialized medicine
and guaranteed incomes) and curtailing of freedom (e.g. speech, assembly and
religion). While it may not manifest itself to the affluent who have cast
their lot with the Democrats, the redistribution of wealth must, by necessity,
come from the wealthy, as that is where the bulk of the nation’s wealth
resides. It is also this same small-in-numbers group that benefits
the most from freedom of speech and assembly.

Once
fully embroiled in this marriage of convenience, a divorce will be impossible
as the co-inhabitant of the Democratic Party, the dependent class, must
continue grow in order to electorally defeat the Republicans and protect the left’s
agenda. Further, the oversold expectations promulgated by the left will
never be satisfied regardless of how many promises are made or token
redistributive programs are enacted by the current ruling class. Only a
complete transformation of this nation into a failed socialist state will
satiate the left, their acolytes and their attendant army of dependency.
A goal more in reach than ever thanks to the inability of the nation’s elites
to give a damn about the future of the country.

There
is not a more short-sighted and self-absorbed group of citizens in this nation
than the white, wealthy well-educated urban and suburban voters. They are willing to rend the fabric of this nation in order to protect
their privilege and lifestyle. While the vast majority of Americans will
ultimately pay the price, the current ruling class and their progeny will have
far more to lose.

This figure includes 2.4 million illegal aliens, although a recent
study from Yale University suggests that
the true number of aliens is at least double that. Modifying
the initial figure implies that nearly one in three Californians is an
immigrant. This is not to disparage California's immigrant
population, but it is madness to deny that such a large influx of people has
changed California's society and economy.

Importantly,
immigrants vote Democrat by a ratio higher than 2:1, according to a report
from the Center for
Immigration Studies. In California,
immigration has increased the pool of likely Democrat voters by nearly 5
million people, compared to just 2.4 million additional likely Republican
voters. Not only does this almost guarantee Democratic victories,
but it also shifts California's political midpoint to the left. This
means that to remain competitive in elections, the Republicans must abandon
or soften many conservative positions so as to cater to the center.

California became a
Democratic stronghold not because Californians became socialists,
but because millions of socialists
moved there. Immigration turned California blue,
and immigration is ultimately to blame for California's high poverty
level.

It Pays to be Illegal in California

It certainly is a good time to be an illegal alien
in California. Democratic State Sen. Ricardo Lara last week pitched a bill to permit
illegal immigrants to serve on all state and local boards and commissions. This
week, lawmakers unveiled a $1 billion health care plan that would include
spending $250 million to extend health care coverage to all illegal alien
adults.

“Currently, undocumented adults are explicitly and
unjustly locked out of healthcare due to their immigration status. In a matter
of weeks, California legislators will have a decisive opportunity to reverse
that cruel and counterproductive fact,” Assemblyman Joaquin Arambula said in
Monday’s Sacramento Bee.

His legislation, Assembly Bill 2965, would give as many as 114,000
uninsured illegal aliens access to Medi-Cal programs. A companion bill has been
sponsored by State Sen. Richard Lara.

But that could just be a drop in the bucket. The
Democrats’ plan covers more than 100,000 illegal aliens with annual incomes
bless than $25,000, however an estimated 1.3 million might be eligible based on
their earnings.

In addition, it is estimated that 20 percent of
those living in California illegally are uninsured – the $250 million covers
just 11 percent.

So, will politicians soon be asking California
taxpayers once again to dip into their pockets to pay for the remaining 9
percent?

Before they ask for more, Democrats have to win the
approval of Gov. Jerry Brown, who cautioned against spending away the state’s
surplus when he introduced his $190 billion budget
proposal in January.

Given Brown’s openness to expanding Medi-Cal
expansions in recent years, not to mention his proclivity for blindly
supporting any measure benefitting lawbreaking immigrants, the latest fiscal
irresponsibility may win approval.

And if he takes a pass, the two
Democrats most likely to succeed Brown – Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom and former Los
Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa – favor excessive social spending and are actively courting illegal immigrant support.

COST to AMERICANS of the LA RAZA MEXICAN
OCCUPATION in CALIFORNIA ALONE: $2,370 per legal.

"Most
Californians, who have seen their taxes increase while public services
deteriorate, already know the impact that mass illegal immigration is having on
their communities, but even they may be shocked when they learn just how much
of a drain illegal immigration has become." FAIR President Dan Stein.

Californians bear an enormous fiscal burden as a result of an illegal
alien population estimated at almost 3 million residents. The annual
expenditure of state and local tax dollars on services for that population is
$25.3 billion. That total amounts to a yearly burden of about $2,370 for a
household headed by a U.S. citizen.

Tucker
Carlson pointed out a few days
ago how the already insufferable leader of the
Congressional Democrats has recently been "ordained….an archbishop in the
church of progressive sanctimony." For a while now, Nancy
Pelosi's been the country's expert on morality (e.g., border wall: immoral;
abortion on demand: moral). She's now taken to telling the country
how much she prays, and she's urging others to do it, too – at least that old
sinner, Donald Trump. After last Thursday's televised squabble in
the Oval Office, Pelosi shared with reporters how she told Trump she was praying for
him and urged the president (whom she also called
a "skunk"
while ridiculing his manhood) to accept the Democrats' budget proposal with no
funding for a border wall. "In fact," she said with
stomach-turning piety, "I asked him to pray over it."

When
a smug person ends an argument by telling you to "pray over it,"
she's really saying, "Ask God. He knows I'm
right!"

Summarizing
her and Chuck Schumer's meeting with Trump, she told the media, "I myself
thought we should open the meeting with a prayer, which I did. I told
him about King Solomon, when he was to become king of the Jews, he prayed to
God, he said: 'I need you to give me great understanding and wisdom,
Lord.'"

King
Solomon is Pelosi's favorite Bible character, especially because he proposed
solving a problem by cutting a baby in half.

Now
Sister Nancy's praying for
Trump to keep the government open so federal
employees can finish their Christmas shopping.

It's
an axiom that if a conservative says his faith informs his political decisions,
he'll be condemned for establishing a state religion, while liberals get to
veer back and forth over the church-state centerline as freely as those motorists
who love to text while driving. Right now the liberal media are
applauding the way Pelosi "schooled President
Donald Trump about the Bible," but it's not clear why. It's not
as if they're suddenly in favor of anyone being schooled in the Bible,
especially anyone in a public
classroom.

Pelosi
never bats an eye without a political motive. This Saint Nancy act
might be her attempt to occupy the spiritual high ground that, obviously,
Donald Trump has shown no interest in occupying himself. Pelosi
wouldn't dare try this with a president like George W. Bush, who, while he
didn't boast about his piety on TV, was recognized as genuine in his Christian
faith – prompting the left's usual reaction: Ross
Douthat wrote in 2006 that "the fear of theocracy
has become a defining panic of the Bush era."

Theology
was less of an issue for liberals during the Obama years; he was their messiah,
and they just worshiped him. Meantime, Obama conspicuously dissed
orthodox Christians with everything from calculated snubs and criticism to
gratuitously tormenting the Little
Sisters of the Poor, all the while devotedly celebrating
the unblemished virtues of
Islam. In 2015, Hillary bluntly
stated that "[d]eep-seated ... religious beliefs
... have to be changed" to accommodate the unlimited abortion
license. Then, last year, Democratic National Committee chairman Tom
Perez said it is "not
negotiable" that "[e]very Democrat" support
abortion. Pelosi tried to mitigate Perez's remarks by saying "of course"
there's room for pro-lifers in the Democratic Party, but try to find one who's
not actually voting Perez-style.

This
year, Pelosi watched the Democrats lurch wildly to the extreme
left. For decades before that, they were trusted allies in the
left's war on conventional morality and religion (except Islam!) for being
repressive, patriarchal, and counterrevolutionary. It may be that,
alarmed that the Democrat brand has become too materialistic, amoral, and
atheist, she thinks she can give it religion. Maybe she can draw an unfavorable
comparison between the reprobate and undisciplined Donald Trump and herself:
the "ardent, practicing Catholic," who exhorts the President to beg
for "the great understanding and wisdom" that she (and Chuck
Schumer?) have already been granted by God. Haven't Republicans
marched under the banner of morality and Christian values long
enough? Now that they've elected the unholy Trump, why can't the
Democrats seize that banner for themselves?

For
one thing, because no evangelical or conservative Catholic would ever buy
it. Sure, the Democratic Party is crowded with Catholics, but the
serious ones left years ago. The leading unserious Catholic is
Pelosi herself, who professes her devotion to the faith but does it while
living in open, willful defiance of the Church's crystal-clear teaching against
abortion: "It is the
teaching of the Catholic Church from the very beginning
that the killing of an unborn child is always intrinsically evil and can never
be justified."

When
her duplicity threatened to become an issue in 2004, Pelosi pretended that,
moved by her "ardent" devotion to the Church, she had been studying
the Church's teaching on the beginning of life "a long time," and she
stated falsely to Tom Brokaw on Meet the Press that the
Church has never
defined it. Asked when human life begins, she
replied, "We don't know," and that "[t]he point is, that it
shouldn't have an impact on the woman's right to choose" – the
"it" being when a human life begins, which shouldn't have an
impact on the decision to get an abortion. Easy mistake to
make when your catechism is Roe v. Wade.

Later,
when a reporter mentioned the Gosnell infanticides and challenged her own
support for partial-birth abortion, an agitated Pelosi snarled back that
"[a]s a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred
ground to me when we talk about this[.] ... This
shouldn't have anything to do with politics." But as a
politician, she never stops talking about it, and the sacred ground she was
talking about wasn't human life, but the exercise of a mother's "free
will" to terminate her child. In response, New York's Cardinal
Egan said, "Anyone who dares to
defend that [the unborn] may be legitimately killed
because another human being 'chooses' to do so or for any other equally
ridiculous reason should not be providing leadership in a civilized democracy
worthy of the name." Her own bishop reluctantly corrected her
misstatements in a public
letter, necessitated by "the widespread consternation
among Catholics" of her deliberate distortions of Catholic
doctrine. Pope Benedict counseled her, in person, on
the Church's express teaching, "which enjoins all Catholics, and
especially legislators," to protect "human life at all stages of its
development." Pelosi, " the respectful Catholic" who
presumed to tell Trump to pray for wisdom, emerged from thatmeeting no
wiser for it, obtusely extolling the "Church's leadership in fighting poverty,
hunger and global warming."

Jesus
warned against hypocrites who make a public display of praying "that they
may be seen by men." The way Pelosi pretends to exemplify
"prayerful" politics, and the way she told Trump "in
private" that she's praying for him – and immediately announced it in a
televised press conference – is pure Pelosi: cynical, addlebrained,
phony. If it might hurt Trump, she'll pontificate how every MS-13
killer retains a "spark of divinity,"
then goes right back to her life's work snuffing out that spark from 60 million
innocents and counting. The Bible never says it's intrinsically evil
to build a wall or protect a border, but it's still got that commandment
against murder.

Let
the Democrats canonize this Pharisee if they need a patron
saint. Her feast day can fall on January 22.

T.R. Clancy looks at the world from Dearborn,
Michigan. You can email him at trclancy@yahoo.com.

The Schumer & Pelosi show

Chuck
Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, the twin nutters of Congress, were certain they could
beat Trump at his own game, but have made fools of themselves, as
usual. The stand-off is not over but with each passing day, the
Democrats reveal more of their anti-American, pro-illegal immigration
agenda. Conservatives have been sounding the alarm for
years: Democrats do not care about American citizens!

We
are an annoying inconvenience, especially those of us who do not buy what they
are selling. We vote against them, which makes them
angry. They lash out at us, call us names, impugn our intelligence
with fervor. All of the late-night comics, the Bill Mahers of the
comedy branch of the entertainment industry, are especially
venal. Jimmy Kimmel has decried those who have contributed to
the GoFundMe
page to fund the border wall as meth addicts. It was begun by
a Vet, Brad Kolfage, who lost three limbs and
it's raised nearly $15m.

It
appears that Democratic members of Congress are as snowflakey as millennials on
our university campuses. They assume that anyone who opposes their
ridiculous socialist, genderless, climate-alarmist, virtue-signaling
directives is a Neanderthal, unfit to have an opinion. It is then
thoroughly acceptable to malign such people, those of us who oppose every
aspect of their anti-America-as-founded agenda, in any and
every disgusting manner they can devise.

The
left is all about identity politics. They assign all of us to a
group -- racial, class, and/or all of their fabricated gender
categories. The right is all about individuals, their
character, their talent, their contributions to society. We do
not care about skin color, economic class or sexual orientation. We
do care about good vs. evil, right vs. wrong. This makes us
quite villainous in the eyes of the left for whom everything is relative. For
example, we do not think poverty causes crime, unlearned values of Western
Civilization do. Try to steal an election? It is moral if it takes
out an opponent. We are, it appears, the left vs. the right, very
different on a neurological level.

Schumer and Pelosi have armed guards whenever they are amongst the
public. But they are both fervent in their quest to deny us the
right to bear arms and to prevent a wall on the southern border to protect us
from the flood of lethal drugs that flow into the US. They are
impervious to the crimes of the barbaric gangs like MS13, no matter how many
innocent Americans they kill. They do not give a thought to the many
illegals from terrorist nations that also seek to enter the country on a daily
basis. Schumer, Pelosi and their willing subjects in Congress ignore
completely the horrific hazards that cross the border every
day. They want cheap labor, no matter how many Americans are left
jobless, and they want, more than anything, a dependent underclass whom they
mean to give the right to vote. They already vote anyway, thanks to
the Left's rejection of Common-sense voter ID.

If
there were a television program based on Schumer and Pelosi, it would have to
be a comedy; the two of them are so inept, so childish. They would
be Dumb and Dumber redux. Each of them seems to believe they run the
country and can dictate to the president how he will govern. They demand that
Trump abandon the wall. They have no intention of compromising; they
only want to deny Trump and his supporters what they want -- border security
that works. So enraged, so benighted, by Trump's presidency,
they would rather see us overrun by migrants from third-world nations, like
those who have destroyed the UK, Germany, Sweden, and the rest of Europe, than
protect America as a sovereign nation.

The
"government shutdown" is just a ploy, many times overused by now,
relatively meaningless to the lives of most Americans. The Schumer & Pelosi
show will do everything they can to hype it as a disaster, but we all know it
is nothing of the kind. Trump must hold out for funding of the
wall.

While
there have been some bad actors in our government in the past, Schumer and
Pelosi are the worst of the worst. They are equally arrogant, each
thoroughly ignorant of reality beyond the bubble of wealth and privilege they
inhabit. They both believe themselves to be smarter than the rest of
us, when in fact they are both really dim bulbs, long past their sell-by
date. Yes, Pelosi is good at raising money; how and why is a
mystery. That each of them is repeatedly re-elected does not
say much for their constituents' familiarity with the Constitution, the law,
American history or the facts in their own communities.

San
Francisco, Pelosi's district is now a hell-hole but for her walled
compound. New York too, like California, is a
state that residents are fleeing as fast as they can. Both
states have been destroyed by moonbatty leftists; high taxes, dumbing down of
education for political purposes, and the sacrifice of common sense to global
warming alarmists. Schumer and Pelosi have for years been on board
with every silly attempt to restructure, to transform, American
society. They both jumped on the Obama bandwagon the moment he was
elected. Along with Obama, they are responsible for incalculable
damage done to this country over the eight years of that
administration. While their constant appearances on television are
so often humorous (Pelosi's silly, practiced hand gestures and
Schumer's relentless badgering of Trump), they are not one bit
funny. They are just loathsome.

The Minuteman Project,
founded by Jim Gilchrist (who is also the co-author of the book Minutemen: The
Battle to Secure America’s Borders), is made up of citizen volunteers who watch
our border with Mexico and report illegal entry to the border patrol. For
performing that thankless task in full compliance with the law, Gilchrist and
his colleagues have been falsely maligned as fascists, racists, and even
murderers. They have been driven off the speaker’s platform at Columbia
University and vilified by Leftist politicians and their handmaidens in the
liberal press.

So it was no surprise
that the mainstream media chose to ignore a recent press release, issued by his
publisher, in which Gilchrist asked the question about Nancy Pelosi’s ethics
that should be on the minds of every law-abiding American – including those
immigrants who are following the law to become citizens here the proper way:
“Do we really need a House Speaker whose every action is calculated to enhance
her own financial interests, instead of focusing on how porous borders will
affect the security of everyday American citizens?”

Gilchrist did not stop
there. He demanded an investigation into Pelosi’s “economic stake in just the
kind of illegal alien exploitation that we deplore in Minutemen.” But you would
never know it from the liberal media, who - while ignoring this demand - have
had no compunctions in calling for Speaker Hastert’s head in the wake of the
Foley page controversy.

Gilchrist was reacting to
my report several weeks ago in FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns
non-union vineyards in Napa Valley where grape-picking depends chiefly on the
availability of cheap foreign labor – is doing everything she can to help open the
floodgates to more illegal immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to
pay their way. As even more proof of this than I previously reported, Pelosi
does not want employers like her to be required to pay the cost of illegal
aliens’ hospital care. She voted against a bill that would make employers
liable for the reimbursements if an undocumented employee seeks medical
attention. And she voted in favor of
rewarding illegal aliens from Mexico with Social Security benefits.

At the same time, Pelosi
has led the Democratic opposition to any effective border controls or
documentation requirements. She opposed the Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed
into law by President Bush, and voted against final passage of a border
security and enforcement bill in 2005 which required that all businesses must
use an electronic system to check if all new hires have the legal right to work
in this country. She voted against a bill to bar drivers' licenses for illegal
aliens in 2005. This year she opposed legislation requiring presentation of a
legitimate government-issued photo ID to prove eligibility to vote, claiming
that “there is little evidence anywhere in the country of a significant problem
with non-citizen voters.” She is dead wrong. For example, an accused terrorist
by the name of Nuradin Abdi was just recently reported to have illegally
registered to vote at the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Nuradin Abdi was
indicted earlier this year as part of a conspiracy to blow up the Columbus
Mall.

How many other terrorist
suspects may have slipped through the system because Leftists like Pelosi
oppose any meaningful screens? Instead she continues to advocate our
recognition of the flimsy, non-validated ID card that the Mexican consulates
provide to illegal aliens before they cross over our border, called the
“matricula consular”, which gives them phony documentation to set up bank
accounts, apply for jobs, obtain social benefits, board airplanes, identify
themselves to police, enter buildings that require IDs, obtain drivers’
licenses and then perhaps use those drivers’ licenses to try to illegally
register to vote in our elections.

Pelosi also believes in
giving sanctuary to illegal aliens. She opposed legislation to deny federal
homeland security funding to state and local governments who refuse to share
information they learn about an individual's immigration status with Federal
immigration authorities. Pelosi’s hometown of San Francisco is one of the
sanctuary cities she voted to protect for the benefit of illegal aliens. Pelosi
even voted against strengthening our immigration law with regard to the
deportability of alien terrorists.

Jim Gilchrist cut to the
chase with this devastating observation that the mainstream media does not want
you to read:

"As we’ve shown
again and again in ‘Minutemen,’ the Democrats aren’t just hypocrites, but are
working actively to subvert our legislative system to their own ends. Their
only goal is votes, votes and more votes, no matter where they come from, no
matter if they’re cast legally, no matter whether the person casting them is
dead, alive, a citizen or an illegal alien."

Pelosi sees Jim
Gilchrist’s Minutemen Project as a threat to her pro-illegal alien agenda. More
illegal aliens mean more votes for the Democrats and more grape-pickers for
Napa Valley vineyards like hers. So she even voted against a measure that would
have cut off the use of U.S. taxpayers’ funds to tip off illegal aliens as to
where the Minutemen citizen patrols may be located! She obviously wants to see the
Minutemen put out of business – permanently. She can count on the liberal press
to distort the work of the Minutemen and to keep out of the public eye
Gilchrist’s pointed questions about her motivations for helping illegal aliens
during the run-up to the mid-term elections that may make her the next Speaker
of the House.

Gilchrist, of course, is
accustomed to being vilified and prevented by the Left from getting his message
out. In early October, he was prevented from finishing his speech at the
"Minutemen Forum" sponsored by the Columbia College Republicans.
Gilchrist had spoken for just a few minutes and managed to utter the words “I
love the First Amendment” when a group of radical protestors took the stage and
interrupted him, displaying a big banner saying "There are no
illegals." More protestors then stormed the stage. Chaos erupted and the
audience members who had come to hear Gilchrist speak never got the chance,
which was precisely the protestors’ objective. As reported online by the staff
of Columbia’s undergraduate newspaper, “a mosh pit of triumphal students and
community members danced and chanted outside, "Asian, Black, Brown and
White, we smashed the Minutemen tonight!" They also put out a statement
declaring:

“The Minutemen are not a
legitimate voice in the debate on immigration. They are a racist, armed militia
who have declared open hunting season on immigrants, causing countless hate
crimes and over 3000 deaths on the border. Why should exploitative corporations
have free passes between nations, but individual people not? No human being is
illegal.” (Emphasis added)

We have come to the point
in this country where a bunch of radical protestors get to decide who is and
who is not a legitimate voice in the debate on as critical a public policy
issue as immigration. Such Leftists think that migration in a borderless world
is a basic human right. They want no barriers, no guards, and no proof of
lawful residency. They certainly do not want the Minutemen watching the border
and reporting illegal entry to the authorities.

Leftist slogans like “no
human being is illegal” are red herrings. It is not the human being who is
illegal; it is what the human being does that may be illegal. One’s conduct is
the test, not simply who one is. Immigrants who follow our rules are welcome
here. Those who do not abide by our laws have no right to be here. A person who
breaks into your house without your permission does not deserve room, board and
a job as a reward, even if the intruder may be much poorer than you. He has
broken the law and deserves to be punished for what he has done. Our country’s
boundaries and rules for entry and residency similarly define who is permitted
to be here and how we choose to protect ourselves. We are a land of immigrants,
but we are also a land of laws with certain core values. Those seeking to enter
our country and remain here must learn to accommodate to our laws and values,
not the other way around. That is the way prior generations of immigrants did
it, including those who passed through Ellis Island. Why should the law be
thrown aside now?

What we are witnessing is
a frontal challenge to our nation’s sovereignty. Mexico’s Foreign Secretary
wants to drag us before the United Nations for intending to build a fence on
our side of the border with our money to keep out aliens who seek to enter our
country illegally. They will probably get a sympathetic ear as some UN
bureaucrats believe there should be no such thing as “illegal” immigrants in
the first place. For the first time in our history, Americans are being asked
to cede the right to decide how we define ourselves as a nation and protect our
own borders to a globalist governance body. Will Pelosi lead her liberal
loyalists as House Speaker to support the UN against America’s right to control
its own borders? Do we really want to risk finding out?

It is high time, as Jim
Gilchrist demanded in the press release ignored by the mainstream media, that
Pelosi come clean under oath as to her personal stake in the illegal
immigration issue before she can do even more damage as House Speaker.

Ilhan Omar: We Should
Debate Whether to Eliminate All Border and Immigration Enforcement Agencies

Providing free, American taxpayer-funded
healthcare to all illegal aliens is just the latest effort to use mass
immigration to turn the United States into the sanctuary state of California,
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) says.

As Breitbart News reported, the majority of 2020 Democrat
presidential candidates have endorsed a plan to force taxpayers to pay for free
healthcare for all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens living across the country.
The plan would cost taxpayers at least $660 billion a decade.

Brooks told SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart
News Tonight that Democrats’ “primary motivation” behind
offering healthcare to illegal aliens is not compassion, but rather an effort
to transform the U.S. into the state of California through mass illegal and
legal immigration.

LISTEN:

Brooks said:

The motivation for all for this is
even worse. They don’t have compassion for these illegal aliens. That’s not
their primary motivation. Their primary motivation is the desire to
acquire raw political power. That’s what it’s all about. [Emphasis added]

If you limit votes to American
citizens, Democrats do not fair to well with us. So what they’re trying to do
is import people who do not understand the foundational principles that have
combined to make America a great nation and who … are
much more likely to vote Democrat once Democrats give them voting rights.
[Emphasis added]

Brooks detailed how California, the
state where former President Ronald Reagan was governor, has been forever
changed due to the country’s mass illegal and legal immigration policy that
imports about 1.5 million foreign nationals a year.

“Let’s learn from history.
California used to be a purple state. Remember, Ronald Reagan came from there …
the Democrats have flooded California with noncitizens,” Brooks said. “And why
do noncitizens vote Democrat so often? Well, let’s look at illegal aliens. The
data shows that 70 percent of households that have an illegal alien in them are
on welfare. The data shows that 60 percent of households that have a lawful
immigrant in them are on welfare. So, you’ve got three different themes that
the Democrat Party now relies on: One is racism, two is sexism, and three is
socialism.”

“In California, what used to be a
purple state, now out of 53 congressional seats, only seven are Republican … 46
are Democrat and seven are Republican,” Brooks said. “So they have seen how
that strategy of importation of foreign voters has worked in California.
They’re trying to do it in Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, in every state
where they can possibly do it. They want to flood the voting booths with people
who are dependent on welfare and who do not understand the principles that have
made us a great nation. That’s how they change the voter pool and they’re doing
it successfully.”

Health insurance expert Linda
Blumberg told theNew
York Times that any of the Democrats’ plans that offer free
health care to illegal aliens is could likely to drive a mass migration of
foreigners with “serious health problems to enter the country or remain longer
than their visas allow in order to get government-funded care.”

Likely U.S. voters, by a majority,
said they oppose being forced to pay for the healthcare of millions of illegal
aliens living in the country, as Breitbart News reported. The latest Rasmussen Reports poll
found that 55 percent of voters said they opposed such a plan, including
8-in-10 Republican voters, about 6-in-10 swing voters, and 62 percent of
middle-class voters.

In the next two decades, should the
country’s legal immigration policy go unchanged, the U.S. is set to import about
15 million new foreign-born voters. About eight million of these new
foreign-born voters will have arrived through the process known as “chain
migration,” whereby newly naturalized citizens are allowed to bring an
unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on
Twitter at @JxhnBinder.