Views » March 31, 2006

The Battle for Fred Hampton Way

Email this article to a friend

your email

your name

recipient(s) email (comma separated)

message

captcha

White Chicagoans with little knowledge of historical context are siding with those who seemingly got away with cold-blooded murder

In early February, Chicago Ald. Madeline Haithcock proposed to name one city block in honor of Fred Hampton, the Black Panther leader who died on the block in an infamous 1969 police raid. She was acting on a request from Fred Hampton Jr., who was born just three weeks after his mother survived the pre-dawn assault on the Panther apartment.

Haithcock’s ordinance to name a block of Monroe Street “Chairman Fred Hampton Way” unanimously breezed through a City Council committee. After all, there are nearly 1,300 honorary street signs in the city already; a tradition since 1984, they are an easy way for aldermen to win the favor of constituents.

But a furor erupted when the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) heard of the proposal. “It’s a dark day when we honor someone who advocated killing policemen and who took great advantage of the communities he claimed to have been serving,” said FOP President Mark Donahue. The police union organized relatives of cops killed in the line of duty to lobby aldermen against the ordinance and several white aldermen expressed misgivings about the honorary designation.

Meanwhile, a coalition of black Chicagoans, including the city’s three black Democratic congressmen–Reps. Bobby Rush, Jesse Jackson Jr. and Danny Davis–came together to urge that Haithcock’s ordinance be passed. The newly formed coalition contains a wide spectrum of supporters and genuinely represents community sentiment.

Chicago’s City Council will deliver a final vote in late March, after In These Times went to press. But the issue reveals, once again, how differing historical narratives can alter current perceptions of reality.

Chairman of the Black Panthers’ Illinois chapter, Hampton was one of the group’s most charismatic leaders. He organized several programs designed to demonstrate that people had power if they acted with a unified purpose.

“We organized breakfast programs, medical clinics, food depositories and other things to show the community that we could change our condition if we seized the initiative,” says Akua Njeri, who shared Hampton’s bed the night of the deadly raid. “It was uncanny, because he was so young to have such a powerful vision. People who came in contact with Fred were always impressed by his tremendous energy and sense of purpose.”

Njeri joined the Panthers in her teens, attracted by the group’s political commitment. She said it contrasted starkly with predatory street gangs and offered a positive alternative for Chicago’s black youth.

In 1968, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover announced the Panthers were “the greatest threat to the internal security of the country,” and developed a counterintelligence program (COINTELPRO) to “neutralize” the group. Various police agencies, spurred by the FBI’s threat assessment, began conducting raids on Panther offices across the country.

On Dec. 4, 1969, the Chicago police did their part, ambushing Panther members as they slept and claiming it was a shootout. Hampton and Mark Clark, a Panther from Peoria, were killed in the assault and several others were injured. Later investigations revealed that all but one of the more than 100 bullets fired in that pre-dawn attack were from police guns.

Despite the fact that no one has ever been punished for the assassinations of Hampton and Clark, police are acting as if they are the aggrieved party. What’s more, white Chicagoans with little knowledge of historical context are supporting the side of those who seemingly got away with cold-blooded murder.

“The question is: whose side are you on?” said Conrad Worrill, Chairman of the National Black United Front at a news conference introducing the coalition. “Are you on the side of law enforcement agencies who want to cover up what happened or the great work of the Black Panther Party?”

Huey Newton and Bobby Seale, two college students in Oakland Calif., created the Black Panther Party for Self Defense in 1966, primarily to counter the racist brutality of the city’s cops. Provoked by similar police abuse, youth in cities across the country were erupting into violent protest.

The Panthers sought to channel that rage into an organized challenge of police abuse and into delivering direct community service to those most in need. The group grew too rapidly to screen members, some of whom had ulterior motives. Some of the Panthers’ tactics were needlessly provocative and provided police a perfect pretext for attack.

Njeri contends the Panthers were victims of a military defeat by counterinsurgency agents and that those efforts continue even now. She cites her son as an example. Fred Hampton Jr. was imprisoned for eight years on questionable charges and both insist they remain targets of police harassment.

As the street sign debate reveals, the echoes of that turbulent era still reverberate in a city still divided by race and class.arguments make a lot of sense.

Salim Muwakkil is a senior editor of In These Times, where he has worked since 1983. He is the host of "The Salim Muwakkil" show on WVON, Chicago's historic black radio station, and he wrote the text for the book HAROLD: Photographs from the Harold Washington Years.

This is a idea long overdue...bottom line the police murdered / assassinated Fred Hampton...( much like Pat Robertson advocated for Hugo Chavez recently )...gun battles between the Black Panthers vs. Police were always kick off by the cops...Huey Newton / Bobby Seale never & I repeat never advocated violence of any kind they championed self defence. Malcolm X said it most directly " Black Nationalism is a direct response too the oppression of white supremacy when white supremacy seizes to exist Black Nationalism will also end ". Malcolm X made this statement in the face of underinformed critics toward the facts concerning the brutality suffered by afrikan people in the U.S. and the diaspora.....Posted by Redhorse on 2006-05-21 06:55:18

Firstly, let me state, as someone who has lived in a diverse mix of places, that big city police brutality is nothing like smaller city police brutality. In area's that generally function as miniature cities, even moreso in small cities that contain prisons, police brutality victims are racistly and classistly selected. Minor offenders of these types of areas get humiliated and beaten to a point where medical attention is needed, and Internal Affairs pays even less mind than with bigger cities because they are too busy.
Secondly, that was the most ignorant joke I have heard in two years "Harrower". To present the norm of African American opinion in an ignorant fashion is a state of denial within itself. I have heard my fair share of intelligent and fact based arguement for the subject. The only reason I have been able to argue without being RACIST (oh, I'm sorry did I pull a card?) is because the U.S. simply is not prepared to back a financial giant like that. We certainly dont need the national circulation of money to be 5 times our actual worth.Posted by Circa Tractus on 2006-05-14 02:07:12

Firstly, let me state that the focus here is skewed. Having lived in many places, I can correctly state that police brutality in major cities is biased by race, however the chunk of police corruption is designated towards criminals and associates of said criminals. In smaller cities, generally ones that hold prisons or factories and contain a large amount of illegal aliens whose housing options are limited to a downtown area, have a much more dispicable type of police brutality. In these areas not only are police more racially biased in their selection of people to mess with, but very minor offenders as well as people who have commited no crime often get beaten into the ground for any amount of disrespect towards police.Posted by Circa Tractus on 2006-05-14 01:56:40

Oh yeah, that bit of sarcasm was completely relevant.
Typical Honorary Street Name != Over-zealous reparations. There's not even really a parallel at all.Posted by Harrower on 2006-04-06 10:02:25

It is time we compensate all US current and former slaves! They have suffered enough.
We should provide them with a stipend of 5 times the minimum wage for life, free health care and free housing. Mental health care should - of course - be included.
Furthermore we need to ensure that the institution of slavery is ended in the US once and for all.
Oh, this is 2006? My bad!Posted by wolf on 2006-04-05 07:05:32

Hitler and Mussolini are flawed comparisons. There is no meaningful parallel between a group formed to resist (and combat) police brutality and racism, and fascist dictators who had their enemies slaughtered, tortured, and imprisoned to remain in power. There may be violence, and the encouragement of violence, in both, but the context is dramatically different.Posted by Harrower on 2006-04-04 09:39:22

While the attack on Fred Hampton was definitely overkill and a tragedy on many levels, it doesn't change the fact that Hampton had repeatedly encouraged "killing pigs" as "justice" and that two uniformed police officers had been killed by Panthers just 2 weeks before Hampton's killing.
While Hamptom himself may never have personally killed anyone, he advocated it and his "followers" certainly did committ murder. Some of Hitler's and Mussolini's policies benefitted their people along the lines of the Panthers' "breakfast programs, medical clinics, food depositories and other things, " and neither of them personally murdered anyone, yet you won't find a Mussolini Way or Hitler Highway anywhere in Italy or Germany!!
Hampton deserves nothing but a peaceful, eternal rest!Posted by davetimp on 2006-04-03 15:43:44

Correction, many think they ARE the law, no distinction. If there is a difference, they don't want to know what it is. Legislatures are bending over backwards to give law enforcement anything they want, in an anti-crime, anti-terror, pro- crackdown fervor and won't wake up for years to what they are doing to their own rights, their kids rights, the rights of ALL.Posted by marge on 2006-04-02 15:31:37

Being from Philadelphia, I cannot help but recall the case of Mumia as a point of comparison. The FOP in Philadelphia has gone to great lengths to silence Mumia. Mumia is branded a cop killer and so he has not been given due process by the law. The same also applies to Leonard Peltier.
Police feel they are above the law, despite the fact that it is their job defend the law. Police abuses are endless. Yet it seems that Hampton has strong community to support him, so maybe they will honor "Fred Hampton Way" in the end.Posted by Epistrophy on 2006-03-30 17:05:10

Excellent work Mr. Muwakkil.
Chicago Police had issues with recognition of the Haymarket riot a couple years ago and the labor riots at the steel mills in South Chicago. I guess we're to believe they're beyond reproach even though they have to torture suspects into "confessing", rely heavily on paid informants instead of doing real investigative work, solve less than half of the murders committed in the city, include known (by them and everyone else) drug dealers and addicts, drunks, slum lords, gang bangers, thieves, racist and rapist among their ranks. They're also about the most ignorant, unprofessional, physically unfit police in the nation. I think the "Fred Hampton Way" sign should go up. F*%k the PolicePosted by theloneous on 2006-03-30 11:37:44