I won’t be around to see it, but I have little doubt that future historians and others will conclude that President Barack Hussein Obama was the worst President ever to serve in that office.

The reason is simple enough. His decisions on domestic and foreign affairs have already demonstrated his astonishing incompetence. His major contribution may in fact be to ensure that the voters elect conservatives in the next two or more elections to come. If he is remembered for anything it well may be the emergence of the Tea Party movement whose influence has been seen over the course of two midterm elections.

One cannot help but think of such things as President’s Day, February 16, reminds us of Washington and Lincoln, both of whom were born during this month. For most it is just a day on which there are a variety of sales pegged to it. For all of us, however, it acknowledges the two Presidents without whom there would not be a United States of America.

Presidents Washington, Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt are routinely ranked at the top of the lists of those judged to have been of greatest service to the nation and, not incidentally, all three presided over wars that led to and maintained America’s sovereignty.

When I have read about Washington’s life, I am always impressed by the man and, not surprisingly, so were his contemporaries, the men he commanded over the long course of the Revolutionary War. The Americans of his time had the highest regard for him. It was Washington who set the pattern of only serving two terms. When the American artist, Benjamin West, told England’s King George III of Washington’s decision, the king said, “If he does that, he will be the greatest man in the world.”

In his 1796 farewell address, Washington said, “Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity.”

Imagine a modern politician talking of religion and morality as the basis of political prosperity—least of all Obama who has disparaged Christianity and protects Islam.

America was particularly blessed and fortunate in its earliest years to have a succession of men who demonstrated extraordinary intelligence, courage, and moral integrity. Following Washington there was John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, and John Quincy Adams. Few nations have been so blessed as ours.

One can only examine Lincoln’s life with a sense of wonder as he rose from humble beginnings to the role of keeping the Union intact in the face of the secession of southern states and the horrendous war that followed. Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered on April 9, 1865 and on April 14 Lincoln was assassinated by an actor, John Wilkes Booth. His death was the occasion of the first American national funeral as cities and towns did their best to out-do one another to honor him. It took his death for people to realize the magnitude of what he had achieved.

The advice Lincoln offered in his time is just as important, if not more so, in ours:

“You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away men’s initiative and independence. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.”

Franklin D. Roosevelt and, earlier, Theodore Roosevelt, are also highly ranked among the Presidents. Both men shared a zest for the job, enjoying it. Teddy regretted announcing that he would not run for a third term (which he did with the Bull Moose Party) and FDR ran and won four times! He did so during the Great Depression and World War II.

Two other families played a role in the presidency, the Adams and, in the modern era, George H.W. Bush was the 41st President and George W. Bush was the 43rd. It is popular to disparage both men, but history may come to another judgment.

President Obama has brought nothing to the presidency except his Marxist theology. He was the least prepared in terms of experience in the workplace and his elections have been more about the manipulation of public opinion and an endless succession of lies.

His signature legislation, ObamaCare, has undermined the nation’s healthcare system. His solution to the Great Recession added more debt in his six years in office than the combined debt of every previous President up to Clinton and did not stimulate the economy as promised. He has been protected by a liberal mainstream media, but the voters have seen through that to turn political power in Congress over to the Republican Party.

One thing is for sure. On future President’s Days, Obama will barely be noticed when Americans look back on those who did much to address the great issues and challenges of their times.

Liberals are wrong on so many things. In fact, they are wrong on almost everything.

For decades the left has made war on freedom and liberty. One of the centerpieces of their assault on liberty is their desire to destroy the right to keep and bear arms. In the 60’s and 70’s, the left made a full frontal assault on the Second Amendment.

After losing badly, they decided they needed another strategy to destroy the Second Amendment.

Mike Schuetz operates a small gun shop in northern Wisconsin called Hawkins Guns. In November, just before one of his peak selling times, his local credit union notified him his account needed to be closed.

“The bank manager said they made a mistake, and they were not supposed to open accounts for those people involved in high-risk industries, which the gun industry and ammunition industry is one of those,” Schuetz said.

It turned out there was a list created by a Justice Department program called Operation Choke Point. The list equates legal gun sellers like Schuetz with escort services, Ponzi schemes, people who sell cable TV de-scramblers — and at least 30 other industries.

The program, which is facing tough questions in Congress, intimidates banks with the threat of heightened scrutiny and increased audits if accounts are maintained in those industries.

Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wis., said Operation Choke Point began as a means of combating fraudulent businesses — but evolved into an arbitrary list of businesses targeted by bureaucrats in the DOJ and banking regulators purely on moral grounds, backed by no legislation

“What they’ve done is they put short-term lenders out of business, gun dealers out of business, ammunition manufacturers out of business. Because in America, if you can’t bank, you can’t do business,” Duffy said.

In northern Wisconsin, Schuetz became suspicious that something strange was happening after his issue with the local credit union. So he concealed an audio recorder and visited his credit union.

A manager and then a regional manager told Schuetz the credit union wanted his business, but he had indeed been placed on a list of “high risk” industries.

“We’re really not anti-gun as a company but our hands are tied, and I feel horrible about this. I didn’t sleep last night,” regional manager Troy Ewer said.

Fox News found several more businesses — from payment processors to ammunition dealers to pawn shop owners to short-term lenders — who all had their bank accounts closed. In response to an inquiry from Fox News, a spokesman for the DOJ wrote, “We do not target businesses operating within the bounds of the law, and we have no interest in pursuing or discouraging lawful conduct.”

Duffy said, “That’s a bald-faced lie.”

Fox News was provided a DOJ memo in reference to short-term or payday lenders that seems to suggest an indifference to harming legal businesses. “Although we recognize the possibility that banks may have therefore decided to stop doing business with legitimate lenders, we do not believe that such decisions should alter our investigative plans,” Michael Blume, director of the department’s Consumer Protection Branch, wrote.

Brian Wise, with the U.S. Consumer Coalition, says there are hundreds and even thousands of businesses across the nation who have had bank accounts closed, and they may not even know their bank was intimidated by Operation Choke Point. “This is one of the greatest abuses of power that the country has never heard of,” Wise said.

The strategy is simple. They don’t have to repeal the Second Amendment. All they have to do is destroy the businesses that manufacture and sell firearms.

That was the real reason behind “Operation Chokepoint.”

The question is what are the Republicans going to do about it? The GOP allegedly strongly supports the Second Amendment. The word allegedly has to be used as with all Republican principles, they seem to be negotiable.

What needs to happen?

First, these gun dealers need to get together and sue every official they can find who had anything to do with Operation Chokepoint. While government officials have a qualified immunity for their policy decisions, this was more than a policy decision. This was a deliberate attempt to drive lawful businesses out of business just because the Regime did not like the business.

Assuming we can get a conservative elected President in 2016, one of the first tasks he or she should take on is having the Department of Justice investigate everyone who was involved in Operation Chokepoint and indict them.

“But to ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow. . . . For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding.” —Jefferson B. Snyder

Vivek Murthy

On Monday, December 15, 2014, Vivek Murthy was confirmed as the nation’s 19th surgeon general by a vote of 51 to 43. Only 37 years of age, Murthy’s credentials for the job were questioned by senators in both parties, the main question being whether or not he has enough experience to be Surgeon General of the United States.

Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) is an orthopedic surgeon who liked Murthy’s academic credentials but said he is unqualified to be surgeon general, due to his lack of real-world experience. Said the senator, “Is Dr. Murthy a renowned expert in treating patients or researching diseases? No, not at all. . . . Has he actually built a career teaching medicine or leading public health organizations? No, not yet.”

Vivek Murthy, Victim Disarmer

The National Rifle Association, perhaps Murthy’s most vociferous opponent, has called him a “serious threat to the rights of gun owners” due to his support of radical victim-disarmament policies. The strong antipathy towards Murthy dates back to a tweet Murthy sent out in 2012: “Tired of politicians playing politics w/guns, putting lives at risk b/c they’re scared of NRA. Guns are a health care issue.”

Although Murthy, when questioned, said, “I do not intend to use the surgeon general’s office as a bully pulpit for gun control,” it is also obvious that his lack of experience and judgment make him all the more malleable in President Obama’s hands. He will say, “Yes,sir!” and do as he is told, despite any claims he will not politicize his office, or else he is wont to suffer the same fate as Chuck Hagel.

Medical Doctors, the New Government Spies

Under Obamacare, in 2014, according to an Obama executive order, doctors were instructed to start asking patients whether or not they have firearms at home. The answer to this question should always be no, whether you are a gun owner or not. I shall explain.

Let us say you answer this question yes, or you merely intimate that you have been considering a gun purchase in order to protect your family. It will then be the doctor’s duty, according to our politically managed healthcare system, to probe for mental health issues. Are you suffering stress from a new job? How about some counseling to ease your cares? Or a Vivek Murthy-style directive may soon instruct all medical personnel, upon discovering you own a gun, to simply refer you for counseling for mental-health evaluation merely on the basis of your gun ownership. (Ironically, this would mean that gun ownership in and of itself would provide the basis for making you ineligible to own a firearm.)

Red Flags & Rights Divestment

The minute you go for counseling, or even just a mental health assessment, the doctor could document that you have “mental health issues.” This would red-flag you in the Obamacare network as “mentally unfit to have a firearm.” Your name would likely be checked against federal and state databases of registered gun owners, and, the next day, police could show up with a search warrant for your weapon, if it turns out that you are indeed a registered gun owner. The police may well be BATFE agents, FBI agents, or Federal Marshals, since the Obamacare database of registered gun owners would be federal. But local law enforcement could also be utilized.

When the police leave your home, they will be taking guns, kitchen knives, or anything else our anti-Constitutional administration deems inappropriate for you to own. In essence, the police will be leaving with your Second Amendment right to defend yourself. What happens if, after the government has grabbed your guns, your home is invaded? It has famously been said that, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away!

So You Want to Buy a Gun?

If you do not already own a gun, but you decide you need to get one for home defense in the future, you will be denied permission by the state to exercise your Second Amendment unalienable right to self-defense, due to the fact that you are a known user of counseling services. And your legal recourse will be limited, since Obama has been appointing more and more statist judges to federal benches, and any law suit will end up in the federal, not the state, court system.

Too Orwellian to believe? Not in Obamaworld. This is exactly the type of thing Democrats have been wanting. Remember, these are the same people who tried to repeal your free-speech rights last spring! (See my article about this athttp://eaglerising.com/9516/will-obama-democrats-repeal-first-amendment/.) It is the kind of policy that Obama wants Vivek Murthy to enforce. Obama knows he cannot rid America of the Second Amendment, so he will use new methods, as yet untried in the courts, to see if he can get around the Second Amendment creatively.

Second Amendment Nullification Is Racist

Almost 47% of Americans use some kind of counseling services at some point in their lives. And Obama and the Democrats want to find ways to make this percentage go even higher. Soldiers returning from war will receive automatic counseling referrals in order evaluate them for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. This will deprive every service member who has been to war of his or her right to bear arms, on the basis that there is a mental health issue already in place, due to the veteran’s having been at war.

Can you imagine an America where an eventual majority of people are classified as having some form of mental illness? Gun ownership would plummet. This, in turn, would cause firing ranges to suffer drops in membership. Many would have to close, along with the gun shops they run as part of their businesses. Places to purchases guns would become scarcer, so the prices of firearms would increase. Fewer people, especially minorities who live in high-crime areas, would be able to afford the higher prices. So gun ownership would become especially rare in crime-ridden areas. This would drive up death rates from violent crime, especially in black communities across America.

Minorities would suffer the most from these policies of government nullification of the right to self-defense. Victim disarmament on such a scale would be nothing less than racist. As the work environment for criminals improves, especially in more impoverished areas, burglars and home invaders will no longer see being shot by a homeowner as a significant risk; murder, rape, and other violent crime rates would only continue to increase.

The English Debacle

After England instituted its gun ban in 1997, criminals had a field day, and England’s murder rate immediately rose about 50%. Fewer legally owned firearms meant more crime and more death by handgun than beforehand. This is because villains will always be able to get weapons. And no doctor anywhere can ever prevent a crook from procuring a gun.

Who said the Second Amendment had to be repealed, in order to deny freedom-loving Americans their right to keep and bear arms? With Obama and his statists on the job, our Constitution will never be properly enforced. The last irony is this one: Under Barack Obama, only common crooks get to enjoy their unalienable right to keep and bear arms!

Have you noticed? Something’s missing in Ferguson. While the situation in Ferguson is different…something is most definitely…missing.

There are…”protesters”… in Ferguson.

Many of the…”protesters”…in Ferguson are armed. Gun shops have been selling out of ammo and weapons there and we’ve seen videos of armed protesters so we KNOW that many of the…”protesters”…in Ferguson are armed to the teeth.

So far…it appears the same as it was before…before what?

I’ll get to that shortly.

In Ferguson…day after day, night after night since August 9th, the…”protesters” have been in the street…up and down the street…all OVER the street. Hell, in those early days, they were burning and looting businesses…causing mayhem and destruction and to be crystal clear…they are threatening the same now whenever the decision from the Grand Jury is delivered. Whatever that decision is.

What’s missing? Something is missing but what?

Now, we’re beginning to see the difference between this and what happened…before.

THESE…”protesters”…have ALREADY committed violence and destruction and they are poised to commit MORE violence and destruction. In Ferguson, the New Black Panthers are threatening to “KILL WHITEY” and just a couple of nights ago, two people were arrested with EXPLOSIVES in relation to what is going on in Ferguson.

Something is missing there. Something’s different.

Give up?

Think…Bundy Ranch.

What did the government have at the Bundy Ranch that’s missing in Ferguson???

FREE SPEECH ZONES!!!

At the Bundy Ranch…the protesters armed or not…protesters who just wanted to speak out and stand up for one person’s rights…were kept for days on end…IN A CATTLE CORRAL…deemed by the government as an…ahem…”free speech zone.”

If the protesters at the Bundy Ranch wanted to have THEIR say…they were FORCED to have it in a corral…away from what was going on AT the Bundy Ranch.

In Ferguson…has anyone…ANYONE AT ALL…seen a free speech zone? A corral for cattle where the “protesters” are herded to have their say?

Nope. Not one. Not a SINGLE free speech zone in Ferguson and the differences between Ferguson and the Bundy Ranch are GLARING.

In Ferguson…violence has already occurred with businesses being burned and looted.

Were there any acts of violence perpetrated by the protesters at the Bundy Ranch? Anything burned to the ground by the protesters at the Bundy Ranch? Any LOOTING at the Bundy Ranch?

Nope.

As the Bundy Ranch protest continued…did the protesters threaten FURTHER or ANY violence?

Well, since they never started any to begin with they couldn’t very well threaten FURTHER violence and in fact, the only violence they DID project was to have been in direct response to the GOVERNMENT opening fire on THEM or on the Bundy family.

SELF-DEFENSE clear and plain.

The difference between the Bundy Ranch and the streets of Ferguson are staggering.

In Nevada, protesters came from far and wide…ON THEIR OWN…to support the Constitution and an old man’s right to graze his cattle where his family had grazed cattle for a century.

In Ferguson, “protesters” have been BUSSED and FLOWN in from AROUND the WORLD for the expressed purpose of causing trouble, violence and destruction in support of an 18 year old GANG WANNABE THUG who picked a fight with a cop and lost.

At the Bundy Ranch…the protesters were there to keep the peace.

In Ferguson, they are there to riot and destroy a city.

Here’s the biggest difference of all…

At the Bundy Ranch, it was an 80 year old white guy who had built and maintained a successful ranching operation always playing by the rules until the government kept changing those rules and he took a stand on principle to keep his business intact and people came to stand with him.

In Ferguson, it was an 18 year old black thug who, by his reported rap sheet, never played by the rules, had photos of himself on social media flashing gang signs and who had just robbed a business and strong-armed that businesses owner before reportedly fighting with a cop and trying to take the cop’s gun from him and now, people are coming to seek retribution for the color of his skin.

In Nevada, at the Bundy Ranch… under this obscene Obama regime…it was GOVERNMENT goons there trying to REMOVE the protesters.

In Ferguson…this obscene regime and its goons are ORGANIZING the…”protesters”…and Obama himself has told them to…”STAY THE COURSE.”

Who is leading this parade of violence in Ferguson? Obama’s pal, Al Sharpton, a master race baiter and tax cheat who owes 4.5 million in state and federal taxes…the same Al Sharpton who has reportedly helped choose Obama’s next race baiting Attorney General.

Also involved in the Ferguson whipping up of the rioters in waiting are the New Black Panthers who yell “KILL WHITEY” and who were caught red handed trying to intimidate voters years ago under the protection of none other than Obama’s CURRENT race baiting Attorney General, Eric Holder.

There’s something else missing…something else vastly different between the Bundy Ranch and Ferguson…

As the thugs occupying Ferguson arm up and threaten violence…where are the calls from the liberals and socialists for…gun control???

Anyone heard the gnashing of teeth over civilians possessing firearms in Ferguson?

We certainly did during the Bundy Ranch situation didn’t they?

Apparently, if people want to possess guns via the 2ns Amendment and keep and bear arms for their own protection the left has a conniption but, if THUGS want them for the root cause of “killing whitey” or to cause general mayhem and violence to seek retribution for the color of some OTHER thug…

That’s just fine…which puts the regime at the disadvantage in Ferguson as many STORE and HOME owners ARE buying weapons for their protection while the GOONS arm up TOO.

In this case, better for the regime to keep their mouths shut so as to allow the bad guys their chance and they’ll claim, to toss it back at us, that the goons were just exercising their 2nd Amendment rights and we should be happy about it. But let one of the rioters get shot and THEN you’ll hear the wailing for gun control.

Just ask a liberal…if you’re a member of the NRA…you’re some sort of terrorist who must be stopped by the power of a dictator’s pen but…if you’re a member of the NAACP or the New Black Panthers or some street gang…not a single peep.

FREE SPEECH for ALL or free speech ZONES for all…once again, the regime wants it both ways.

Ferguson is a powder keg and so was the Bundy Ranch…the difference is that at the ranch, it was the protesters who kept it from being ignited…in Ferguson…it is this regime’s cronies who are supplying the gasoline and the matches.

And you dare to tell me that this regime is NOT setting the stage for a nationwide race war?

Are you KIDDING me???

Nobody died at the Bundy Ranch because protesters stood up for what was right. Ferguson will no be that lucky because goons, thugs and gangs, those to whom the color of their skin is THE most important thing in their lives…are there to stand for what was black and the government has seen to it that there’s not a free speech zone corral in sight.

One thought on “Ferguson Rioters are NOT in the Zone”

All a part of Obama’s grand plan based on Hitler’s plan. Pit two races against each other, fan the flames of war between the two races, declare it impossible to quell the riots, declare martial law, disband the Congress and the Supreme Court, register all firearms, confiscate firearms of groups threatening public safety (Tea Party members, NRA members, Conservatives, Republicans probably in that order). The final straw will be to declare himself the Devine Leader and our republic will be lost.

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.com

Dear Republican Members of the United States 114th Congress,

You were elected by this nation’s largest and most influential entity…We the People…on November 4th, 2014. Please substitute the word “HIRED” for the word…”ELECTED.”

WE want YOU to know that YOU work for US…not the other way around and if you fail to do what WE have HIRED you to do…WE…will fire…YOU.

Let’s start with our borders.

SEAL THEM UP. This is the United States of America and our laws do NOT allow trespassing by those who are not on the guest list so shut those borders down. Enforce the existing laws regarding deportation of ILLEGAL ALIENS and build a damn fence…guard it…electrify it if need be to keep those whom you deport as well as those trying to take from us what is ours, from sneaking into our country.

There ARE legal ways of coming to this country and all who respect those means are more than welcome to be here. That system needs work…streamlining…do that but not until after you have shut the border down.

Got it?

Next…

Change the rules of engagement for our military and quit sending our men and women to win the hearts and minds of those who want us all dead.

Define our enemies and kill them. Don’t leave the theater until the job is done and leave a few Members of our military there to maintain the peace.

Don’t worry about collateral damage or offending those with a 7th century mentality. They don’t worry about offending us and they don’t give a damn about collateral damage either.

Seek them out…destroy their ability to spread and…kill them.

QUIT sending OUR money to countries that want to KILL us!!! Support our FRIENDS around the world…help those who need medicine or have been harmed by forces or others out of their control but…ENOUGH WITH SENDING OUR MONEY TO THOSE WHO WANT US AND OUR ALLIES DEAD!!!

For instance…no more money for “Palestine.” in the first place…there is no Palestine and in the second place…all they do with it is give it to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood who are trying like hell to destroy Israel and kill all the Jews. ISRAEL AND THE JEWS ARE OUR FRIENDS…HAMAS AND THE “PALESTINIANS” ARE OUR ENEMIES.

Knock that crap off.

Obamacare…

Repeal it…defund it…get rid of it. It’s socialism. It is bleeding us dry and the quality of our healthcare is already going down the toilet. It’s not what we were promised…not at all what we need and certainly not what we want.

Obamacare is based on lies, was passed with bribes and has been altered by mandate without consent of congress ever since.

It’s rife with fraud and it leaves We the People open to identity theft while it is driving UP the cost of healthcare, deductibles and prescriptions.

Do whatever needs to be done to get Obamacare OUT of our lives.

Energy…

BUILD THAT DAMN KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE!!!

The cost of a gallon of gas has been dropping but NOT because of anything done by this current regime. It’s because PRIVATE companies are drilling and retrieving gas from oil shale in North Dakota on PRIVATE land and OPEC is flooding the market because they’re pissing in their pants over the fact we are producing more of our own energy so…ENOUGH WITH THE “SKY-IS-FALLING” EPA REGULATIONS…DRILL SOME MORE HOLES AND OPEN UP GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED LAND TO DO IT!!!

>FYI: Nowhere in the constitution does it allow for Federal land ownership. The Feds only need D.C. and military bases. All the rest belongs to their respective States and We the People!!!<

Between getting oil to our southern refineries via that pipeline from our FRIENDS in Canada and tapping our own oil at HOME…we can become energy INDEPENDENT in a few years so…DO IT and while you’re at it…USE OUR MONEY TO SUPPORT CLEAN COAL AND STOP THROWING IT AWAY ON UNAFFORDABLE GREEN ENERGY THAT DOESN’T WORK or is unaffordable!!!

We HIRED you to get these things done so DO them.

Defund and shut down the Department of Education.

They’re too butt stupid to be on our payroll and they’re making our kids stupid by osmosis. Stupid kids become stupid adults and the last thing we need of our next generation is a bunch of stupid adults in charge of everything that are so damn fragile that their feelings get hurt if they’re not allowed to believe that 2+2=17.

Trust me…they’ll feel a lot better when they LEARN 2+2=4 and they’ll be an ASSET to society later in life.

Make it ILLEGAL for unions to FORCE membership on workers. If the unions are worthy, workers will join them. If not, they won’t but it should be THEIR CHOICE whether or not they JOIN a union and if union rolls drop and they can’t sustain themselves then guess what? They must not have been worth crap to begin with.

Quit using our money to fund abortion clinics. It’s not healthcare and both you and they damn well know it. Let those who support the practice donate THEIR money to them and quit making those who DON’T support the practice PAY for it.

Liberals are always squealing about being “fair” and well…THAT’S fair.

Clear off Harry Reid’s desk. There are more than 365 bills…PASSED by the 113th House sitting there because HE wouldn’t allow them to come to the senate floor for a vote. PUT THEM ON THE FLOOR AND VOTE ON THEM…pass them and send them to the Lame Ducktator. If he VETOS them…try to OVERRIDE the vetos and if that doesn’t work we won’t blame YOU but we WILL replace HIM.

CUT THE BUDGET!!!

Too much of OUR money is being wasted…spent on pet project CRAP and we DON’T need to know how fast a SHRIMP can run on a treadmill. CUT the stuff we don’t need. CLOSE any and ALL government offices who have a long history of WASTING our money. Use that money to invest in our MILITARY as THAT is an investment in FREEDOM and LIBERTY that WILL pay dividends for our children who know that 2+2=4 and their children as well.

The Obama scandals…

Where do I start?

Go full on, in his grill DEEP with the investigations into Fast and Furious…Benghazi…the IRS and the spying. SUBPOENA HIS NARROW ASS…HILLARY’S WIDE ASS…HOLDER’S ASS…LEARNERS ASS and all the rest of the asses…THERE IS TREASON THERE…IMPEACH HIM AND ARREST HIM!!! ARREST THEM ALL and put them on trial.

Make it known that now that YOU hold sway in the House AND in the senate…whistle blowers have nothing to fear. THEY WILL BE PROTECTED and WE need to know the TRUTH.

DO…NOT…COMPROMISE…with liberals.

DON’T DO IT!!!

There is NOTHING that they have done over the last 6 years while this regime has been in place that has been good for America. Not one damn thing. DO NOT GIVE THEM ANY QUARTER…NOT ONE INCH!!!

We hired YOU to stand UP to them and to undo the damage they have brought upon our nation.

If what they want…SOCIALISM…had been working…YOU wouldn’t have been hired to FIX it.

Tell the “Constitutional Law Professor” to keep his damn hands OFF our guns…give us our privacy and stay the hell out of our religious faiths. We will stand with the Constitution and our founding documents even if he doesn’t and YOU would be wise to stand with US.

And finally…

Don’t lie to us. We’re in no mood to be lied to. Tell us the truth…not what you think we want to hear because when you start doing that, you’ll say one thing to this group and another to that group. We can smell bullshit upwind from a mile away.

Our founders and framers entrusted to us a short leash upon which you are to be tethered and we will honor that trust. They entrusted us to remain engaged and to hold you accountable. We will honor those trusts too.

Many of you who were hired were not the first choice of many Conservatives and we have the clothes pins to prove it but you would not be where you are today were it not for us. You know it and so do we.

Know that if you fail to deliver…if you fail to be honest and trustworthy employees of We the People…we will fire you and find more suitable replacements.

This coming January, you will be sworn in. You will vow to uphold and defend the Constitution and we will be watching…every day…to make sure you do.

Remember…the same people who sent you to Washington can send you packing.

Fellow Americans…if you agree with this letter, I encourage you to sign your name and your state in the comment box below and forward the link to this letter to as many Members of Congress as you feel need to read it.

George Mason was a visionary of liberty. He was the chief force behind the Virginia Declaration of Rights in 1776—the document which provided the framework for the Bill of Rights fifteen years later.

As a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, Mason was concerned that despite the best intentions of leaders like James Madison and George Washington, the federal government might grow beyond acceptable limits and invade the people’s liberty.

As the convention was winding towards its end, Mason realized there was a crucial oversight in the proposed method for future constitutional amendments. The proposal on the floor provided that all amendments would be proposed by Congress and then would be ratified by the states. Mason, however, contended that under this process, Congress would never propose amendments to rein in the power of the federal government. Consequently, there was no ultimate check to keep the government from growing too large.

Like the other key leaders of his generation, Mason understood that the most important protection for liberty was a structure of government that funneled power through a strict system of checks and balances. According to Mason, the states were the ultimate check on the federal government. So Mason suggested, and the Framers unanimously agreed, that the states needed to have a way to propose amendments too.

This is why Article V of the Constitution provides two methods to propose amendments to the Constitution. Congress can propose amendments when two-thirds of both houses of Congress approve an amendment. Alternatively, state legislatures can apply for a convention to propose amendments on a particular topic. Once two-thirds of the states apply, Congress has a mandatory duty to call such a convention by naming the time and place for the convention to begin.

Virginia lost no time applying for such a convention. In November of 1788, before the new government under the Constitution was operational, the legislature of Virginia passed an application under Article V applying for a “Convention of the States” for the purpose of proposing a bill of rights and other similar amendments.

Virginia’s legislature was composed of many of the same people who wrote and ratified the Constitution. They knew what Article V said, they knew what it meant, and they intended to use it. The states were trusted to limit the power of the federal government. And they knew that Article V existed, not for the purpose of rewriting the whole Constitution, but to propose particular amendments. Ultimately, of course, Congress passed a bill of rights and the states were satisfied.

There have been over 400 applications for a Convention of States (COS) passed by the state legislatures in the 226 years since that first application. But, there has never been a COS because two-thirds of the states have never agreed on a particular subject.

This leads us to the first iron-clad rule of constitutional law governing a COS: The states must agree on the agenda for the COS and until the states set the agenda, no convention is convened.

A COS was designed to stop federal abuses of power, which begs the most obvious question in American politics today: Is the federal government abusing its power?

Thomas Jefferson would say that the answer to this question is self-evident. No sensible person can deny that every branch of the federal government is abusing its power.

Congress legislates on topics using power it does not have. It spends money—trillions of dollars—that it does not have. The President regularly legislates—a power he does not have—through executive orders and regulations. The Supreme Court rewrites the Constitution—a power it clearly does not have—through interpretations of the so-called “living Constitution.”

The Founders would be furious with the federal government’s abuse power even if it was using its power wisely install effective policies. But the chaos, debt, and devastation created by the federal government proves the truth of one of the Founders’ central beliefs: Tyranny never results in wise government.

To be clear, the federal government is not only abusive, it is also incompetent.

The Founders would not be surprised by these abuses, but they would be shocked that we have tolerated them for so long. They would demand an accounting for the gift of liberty that they fought and died to give us. And when we tried to blame Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court, they would shake their heads. “We gave you Article V,” they would say. “We gave you the power the power to stop tyranny. Why haven’t you used it?”

Internal threats are always the greatest dangers to liberty. We must use the Constitution’s own system of checks and balances to save this nation and our legacy of liberty. And we need to do it now.

We’ve witnessed the IRS targeting of groups at odds politically with the big government agenda of this administration and their allies in Congress. We’ve seen the EPA target the coal industry for discriminatory regulations with the intent of pushing and entire industry out of business. We’ve watched as the U.S. attorney general’s office targeted an American guitar company for using wood they legally purchased. And we believe that in every one of these instances, the government bureaucracy acted for purely political purposes. We’ve even heard the president of the United States state plainly that he’s willing to act administratively to achieve his goals.

So when I heard the story of a Houston-area gun shop owner who suddenly had his loan called in by the bank I have to admit my ears perked. But in this case I remain cautious about jumping to any conclusions. My first thought was the business was mismanaged and the bank was simply foreclosing on a bad client, which turns out not to be true. That’s when the story got interesting.

The owner Jeremy Alcede has been known for irritating the left with the sign just outside his Katy gun shop with statements like “I like my guns like Obama likes his voters undocumented.” This certainly hasn’t won him any fans from the gun control crowd or for that matter, any of the left’s special interest groups.

His new sign says “Obama and Icon Bank Trying To End Us On July 1st” because Alcede says, though he’s been in good standing with the bank and has never missed a payment on his loan, the board of directors decided not to renew the loan. On the Tactical Firearms website he claims the bank told them “government does not support loans to the gun, alcohol or hotel industries.”

In the Tactical Firearms case there is another possible explanation too. A member of the board, Mark Evans, is the owner of a new gun shop in Houston, creating a potential conflict of interest. This could explain the vote to call in his loan. But if that’s true, it doesn’t reflect well on Icon Bank, not if that’s how they treat customers in good standing anyway. For this case I’m in the wait for more facts and see what shakes out.

But this isn’t the first time a gun shop has made this claim. According to the Washington Times many gun shops and other business owners have complained about new financial and banking regulations that have unfairly labeled their businesses as high risk and had their loans denied or otherwise restricted.

Government agencies are engaging in “Operation Choke Point,” where the government asks banks to “choke off” access to financial services for customers engaging in conduct the Administration does not like—such as ‘ammunition sales.

As we’ve seen many times before with the Obama Administration, when they can’t get what they want through the political process, they seem to use administrative measures to accomplish the same goal.

This, then, raises a question: Is what’s happening with Tactical Firearms part of a nationwide effort aimed at enacting a version of gun control without congressional approval? Given the other exposed scandals that demonstrate this administration’s willingness to strong-arm political opponents and citizens, it seems highly likely that it could be true.

By simple use of deductive reasoning we can reach some conclusions. The housing crisis was used to create the need for the federal government to step in and bail out many banks and financial institutions. This prompted a political response and Congress passed Dodd-Frank, the financial reform package, which the president hurriedly signed into law in 2010.

This law has led to more stringent regulations on an already burdened industry. Operation Choke Point demonstrates that federal government agencies have gained significant influence on these industries and their decisions, through Dodd-Frank. Given that they could easily encourage (by that I mean through use of force) certain behavior from that industry like restricting loans to unfavorable businesses.

How does that lead to gun control?

Indirect control of guns and ammunition sales, that’s how. By restricting loans to gun shops and ammunition resellers, you dry up their inventory. Without the banks loaning money to this industry they can’t buy bulk inventory; that will cause supply to fall well short of demand, dramatically increasing prices. That pushes the price point higher, and the higher the price, the less people can afford to buy. Through this method of gun control, only the companies that are debt-free will survive the crunch, which serves to further reduce the number of businesses that can operate.

Yes it’ll hurt the economy and put people out of work, but this president and his allies in Washington don’t seemed concerned about jobs as much as they are the fundamental transformation of America.

In a press briefing on June 10,2014, one of the Obama Administrations principle press secretaries, Josh Earnest said unequivocally, “The president’s goal is to look for opportunities to act administratively, unilaterally using his executive authority to try to make our communities safer.” In other words, he’ll use administrative actions to enact some level of gun control.

And he just may have a shot at it by hiding behind the robust regulatory environment in Washington to accomplish that goal. It’ll take an honest media and a boisterous populace to expose this Chicago style political thuggery, or a massive change of the guard in Washington, of which neither is highly probable. What is certain is the political machine in Washington has every intention of trying to thwart the Second Amendment more than they ever have before.

So for those of us who are strong advocates of the Second Amendment, hold on to your hats and stock up on your supplies because you don’t know when the next crisis that leads to another power grab, by this government, will happen. But, my guess is it’ll happen sooner rather than later.

It is depressing beyond words that we will have to endure two and a half more years of an endless stream of lies about climate change from President Obama.

On June 14 he gave a commencement speech to graduates of the University of California at Irvine, using it to tell Big Fat Lies, not the least of which was that the Earth’s temperatures were rising when in fact they have been falling for nearly eighteen years.

It is an endless source of wonder to me that no part of the mainstream media disputes him when he says things like this. For years now they have been reporting the evidence of increasingly cold weather worldwide. On the same day the President was lying about warming, eight inches of snow fell in Rize, Turkey. It has fallen as well in South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Russia while closer to home snow fell on several cities in Idaho with cold freezes extending into Oregon. In June!

Obama used the speech to demand that politicians take steps to acknowledge climate change which used to be called global warming until it became undeniable to everyone except the charlatans lining their pockets with utterly bogus “research” that underwrites the source of the lies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Obama continues to listen to his White House advisor, Dr. John Holdren, whose contempt for the human race is such he would happily see large parts of it disappear. In February, Holdren told reporters that all weather is impacted by climate change, but that is what climate change has done for 4.5 billion years. Not mentioned was that climate cycles are measured in centuries while weather is a short-term event. The most recent mini-ice age lasted from 1300 to 1850.

Holdren alluded to droughts affecting parts of the nation, claiming they were getting longer and drying. Two leading climate scientists, former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer and University of Colorado climate scientists, Roger Pielke, Jr, called Holdren’s assertions “pseudo-science rambling.” “The idea that any of the weather we are seeing is in any significant way due to humanity’s greenhouse gas emissions verges on irrationality,” said Spencer. Pielke called Holdren’s assertions “zombie science.”

While Holdren is warning about droughts that could cause famines, James M. Taylor, the managing editor of the Heartland Institute’s monthly, Environment & Climate News, took aim at the IPCC claims, noting that U.S. and global crop production, especially the most important staple food crops, corn, rice, and wheat, “have more than tripled since 1970. During the past few years, the United States has set crop production records for alfalfa, cotton, beans, sugar beets, sweet potatoes, canola, corn, flaxseed, hops, rice sorghum, soybeans, sunflowers, peanuts and wheat, to name just a few.”

The worst part of Obama’s lies about the so-called “greenhouse gases” that we’ve been told for decades are warming the Earth is the way those lies are translated into government policies. The Obama administration, via the Environmental Protection Agency, has launched a war on coal-fired plants that produce 40% of the nation’s electricity claiming that their emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2) are causing a warming that is not happening. What is happening is a deliberate effort to drive up the cost of electricity for everyone.

America runs on electricity and 68% of it is generated by fossil fuels, 20% by nuclear, and 7% by hydropower. So called “clean energy”, wind and solar, provides about 4% at far higher costs than the others and exists largely due to government subsidies and mandates.

Claims about increased severe storms, heat waves, and hurricanes simply have no basis in fact. In recent years there has been a record low in the numbers of tornadoes, hurricanes, no change in the rise of sea levels, but record gains in Arctic and Antarctic ice. None of this is reported by the mainstream media.

Yet Obama told graduates that rising temperatures and sea levels, as well as intensifying storm patterns represent “one of the most significant long-term challenges that our country and our planet face.” He said this even though his administration’s recent National Climate Assessment acknowledged that “There has been no universal trend in the overall extent of drought across the continental U.S. since 1900.” The report, however, is being used to justify carbon-related regulations.

While the world’s attention is on one of the greatest threats facing it, the takeover of northern Iraq by a barbaric Islamist group—one from which even al Qaeda disassociated itself—Obama is talking about non-existent climate threats to further policies that kill jobs in the U.S. and harm its struggling recovery of our economy.

While the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) seeks to expand its control of a major portion of the Middle East, Obama thought it was more important to lie about the climate to college graduates.

How much more damage Obama can inflict on the economy between now and the end of his second term in office is unknown, but what we do know is that his priorities, based on scare-mongering speeches about the climate will continue until he leaves office.

Well, I guess you get the idea, and if you follow this link back to The Blaze, you’ll see that pretty much all of the dots on that hysterical Everytown map have turned out to be misrepresented, grotesquely misrepresented. Charles C. Johnson has taken the trouble to research the map, and detail the circumstances of each shooting, not one of which turned out to be a mass shooting at a school. Most were gang related incidents of violence that occurred somewhere other than at a school. So, to all of you who’ve passed this blatant lie along with the message that, “it’s for the children,” please consider the message you’re sending to those young skulls full of mush when you use blatant fabrication as your argument to destroy America’s Second Amendment Rights.

Every day now, one of my liberal progressive, friends forwards some piece of propaganda advocating for the abrogation of America’s right to keep and bear arms. The latest bit of dishonesty claims that we now have one incident per week of a school getting shot up and kiddies being slaughtered. The trouble with that meme of course is that once even the smallest bit of scrutiny is used to look at their evidence of the great American Abattoir, the story falls apart completely, and what we’re left with are liberals running amok, mostly due to liberal policies having been enacted to keep them from ever facing consequences for previous poor decision making.

Now I get that you guys don’t want to see children hurt, and that your entire world view is ruled by your emotions. Your bigger than mine caring heart does you credit. With that being said however, there is a reason why George Mason insisted upon inclusion of the Bill of Rights as a part of the original Constitution before getting on board with ratification of this document as our primary national law, and the founding of our republic. Included within the 8 Amendments authored by Mason was the Second. If some of you wish to see that part of our Constitution wiped away, then I respect your opinion. I think you’re wrong, but have your say so.

Our Founding Fathers were intelligent enough to know that they weren’t perfect, or that times would change. That is why they’d had the foresight to include two, count them two, methods for changing the Constitution in Article V. Incrementally legislating away this basic right, granted not by government or our fellow man, but as a part of our birthright as human beings, is itself disingenuous and dishonest. Putting aside all other arguments, the Second Amendment is the only device we have that will ultimately protect us from facing our very own tyrannical behemoth. It is not a deer hunting or bird hunting amendment. It is not about feeding a family. It is not even really about protection from home invasion or masked marauders. It is about thwarting a government that has wrestled power from the people, and keeping that government in check by those governed. There is no possible argument in my mind which could possibly trump that consideration, however, please feel free to try. If you wish to take away our guns, do so through the Article V process. That would at least be consistent with how America is supposed to work.

One final thought for my progressive friends. Every time we get into it, you and I, I am doused with comments advising me to stop watching Fox News, or listening to Rush Limbaugh. By the way, I really do very little of both, but that’s beside the point. In every instance of this advice, not once has specific example been made as to why either source is not worthy of my attention. I’ve seen the Fox lies claim, but it’s always been a blanket charge. There has not been one single instance, ever, where this charge has been substantiated. Here however, is that substantiation of your argument being not only a lie, but one of epic proportion. What ever grudging emotional support for you position I may have had has now been wiped away for ever. That is the back lash for this fallacious piece of baloney that you’ve seen fit to forward without thinking. Looking back over the years, at the tortured statistics, misapplied economics lessons, mined quotes, quotes taken out of context, distorted historical perspectives, and flat out fabrications, I realize that the political left has not offered one honest argument to support anything they’ve posited. You can single out Fox all you want, but look in the mirror when you wish to point out something not worthy of trust. At least be truthful when discussing your plans for America. Honesty after all is what’s best for the children.

Editor’s Note: Earlier this week, we brought you news about the producer of the film that was at the heart of the Obama administration talking points on Benghazi admitting to being a Muslim, not a Coptic Christian as he had been portrayed to America. Now Walid Shoebat, Ben Barrack and Keith Davies confirm he is an agent of Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

The producer of the anti-Muhammad video the Obama administration blamed for the Benghazi attacks is actually a confirmed agent of Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

The damning trail of evidence begins when a fictitious narrative was concocted by the FBI to lure the courts that Nakoula (the Filmmaker, aka Yousef) was supposed to help the FBI catch Eiad Salameh, his partner in crimes for many years. Yet, the deal was never fulfilled and Eiad was let go by the Feds in 2011 as Shoebat.com revealed in a firsthand account never before reported, including a recorded conversation between Nakoula and Shoebat.com in which the filmmaker defended Eiad, the very man he was supposed to help the FEDS catch!

Bolstering the case (aside from the Feds letting two criminals go) is how the filmmaker became an agent of Eric Holder. After Nakoula’s arrest, there was a very curious development at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, which was handling his case through an Assistant U.S. Attorney who suddenly was pulled off the case and replaced by a full bird – Chief of the office’s Criminal Division, Robert Dugdale.

Nakoula got high-profile attention.
In an article that appeared in the Washington Times, Kerry Picket wrote:

What is curious, though, is the fact that the original Asst. U.S. Atty. Jennifer Williams, who helped prosecute Mr. Yousef’s [Nakoula] bank fraud conviction, is not the attorney Mr. Yousef’s lawyers would eventually deal with. Mr. Yousef’s probation violation case, for no explained reason, was kicked up to Chief Criminal Division prosecutor Asst. U.S. Atty. Robert Dugdale. Dugdale is second in the chain of command below U.S. Atty. Andre Birotte of the Central District of California.

Picket was suspicious, she attempted to get answers from the office’s spokesman, Thom Mrozek:

When I pointed out that AUSA Dugdale was not part of the team of attorneys who did prosecute Yousef’s case and asked why the case was kicked up the chain to AUSA Dugdale, Mr. Mrozek responded, “I don’t comment on staffing decisions.”

The U.S. Attorney over Dugdale – Andre Birotte, Jr. became the local caretaker of a very high profile and high stakes case the Obama administration wanted to control very closely and later was nominated by Obama to be U.S. District Judge for California’s Central District.

Eiad Salameh, Nakoula’s partner in crimes – also beholden to the administration – obtained special favors from doing the Justice Department’s bidding. According to a report by The Smoking Gun just days after the Benghazi attacks, charges against Eiad (who has a proven rap sheet) were dropped in the same year that Canadian authorities picked him up:

It is unclear whether Salameh, whose whereabouts are unknown, has been charged in connection with the bank fraud. Salameh was named in a 2006 federal criminal complaint charging him with felony fraud. That complaint–filed under one of Salameh’s many aliases–was dismissed last year by federal prosecutors. A court docket shows that no filings were made after the initial complaint, likely indicating that Salameh was never apprehended.

But the last sentence is incorrect; Salameh was apprehended.

Jeffrey Mason of the Canadian Peel Police picked Salameh up in January of 2011!

At that time, he should have been wanted in connection with both the 2006 and 2009 cases, assuming he was involved in the Nakoula bank fraud case. Yet, the 2006 case was dropped in either the same month Eiad was arrested or in the months that followed.

Shoebat.com has learned from one retired FBI agent that this doesn’t just happen unless Eiad was providing the Feds with something in return for such treatment.

As Shoebat.com has reported, a timeline provides further evidence that the Obama Administration was in cahoots with these figures in the summer of 2011, during the July-August time frame.

1.) Secretary of State Hillary Clinton co-chaired a meeting in Istanbul, Turkey with the head of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). It was to be the first of several meetings that would become known as “The Istanbul Process”. One of the objectives of the OIC has been and remains, to pressure non-Muslim countries to censor speech critical of Islam.

2.) Nakoula began casting for his video.

3.) Eiad Salameh was put on a plane back to Palestine by the Canadians after Eric Holder’s FBI refused to have him extradited and charged.

Eiad was clearly on the hook with the U.S. Justice Department if his 2006 case was dismissed.

FBI’s Benghazi Investigation
When UN Ambassador Susan Rice blamed Nakoula’s video for the Benghazi attacks during her five Sunday talk show appearances on September 16, 2012, it served to anger the president of Libya, who shortly before Rice, had identified the attack as an act of terrorism. Last year, State Department whistle blower Gregory Hicks, the Deputy Chief of Mission in Libya at the time of the attacks, testified about this and said Rice’s comments prevented the FBI from getting to the site of the attacks for weeks.

Here is Hicks giving his testimony while being questioned by the current chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC):

Based on the FBI’s relationship with Nakoula and Eiad, the longer it took to get to the scene of the Benghazi attacks, the more compromised that scene would become. A compromised crime scene would have served to aid the perpetuation of the video narrative.

Hicks also testified that he was not interviewed by the FBI:

Silencing Skeptics
Is it unusual for the U.S. Government to empower informants to engage in a massive scheme and criminal enterprise for the purpose of creating a political climate to help push an agenda? Hardly. In much the same way that the Obama State Department championed the “Istanbul Process” as a vehicle to assault the first amendment, a gunwalking operation was used to assault the second amendment.

In Operation Fast and Furious, multiple federal agencies worked together as part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF). The stated purpose of the operation was to track guns that were being trafficked into Mexico, arrest the bad guys, and confiscate the guns. In reality, as has been clearly demonstrated, the actual purpose was to allow the guns to “walk” into Mexico and make their way into the hands of drug cartels after the ATF – an arm of the Justice Department – mandated U.S. gun store owners sell the guns to bad guys.

In 2011, ATF Special Agent in Charge (SAC) William Newell was grilled by House Oversight Committee member, Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-PA) about the operation being an OCDETF case. Newell trapped himself in one of the most compelling moments of Fast and Furious hearings, beginning at the 3:00 mark:

<center> </center>

The guns would be picked up at crime scenes and American gun store owners would be blamed in a blood libel (sound familiar?). The cover of that operation was blown after the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. An ATF whistle blower named John Dodson came forward and the scandal was exposed.

If blood libel and the collateral damage of innocent human lives in the interest of pushing an agenda like gun control was used to launch an assault on the second amendment, why would it be beyond plausibility to envision the same administration launching an assault on the first amendment using to create the climate for speech control?

Ironically – and perhaps not so coincidentally – the man in charge of the Criminal Division involved in both Fast and Furious and the post-Benghazi prosecution of Nakoula was Lanny Breuer.

Obama’s Marxist Roots
From Obama’s Marxist Roots we can learn about the term agitprop which describes a tactic that is of Russian origin. It has three definitionsone of which is “agitation and propaganda,” promoted by “agitpropists,” people who are trained or take part in such activities. Fast and Furious was clearly agitprop and it was also an OCDETF case, which meant it spread across an entire administration. Such was the anti-Muhammad video which also involved multiple administration agencies and departments. Barack Obama’s Communist Party USA (CPUSA) mentor was Frank Marshall Davis, a man followed closely by a completely different FBI for 19 years. Davis wasn’t just a CPUSA member; he was a Communist writer and propagandist; he was an… “agitpropist.”

In conclusion, cutting a deal with one criminal to help them catch another it didn’t want brings legitimate questions about how Nakoula’s case was handled by Holder’s Criminal Division, where the possible monies obtained for the film, led at the time nationally by a figure whose claim to infamy is that he wound up as a central figure in the Operation Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal – Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer. Along with Holder, Breuer, Dugdale, Birotte should all be deposed by the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

So should Nakoula and Eiad.

The question should be: Why did the law enforcement bureau Holder led refuse to pick up Eiad when offered on a silver platter by Canadian authorities in 2011. What was the source of the monies spent on the movie? Why was Nakoula given a lesser prison sentence to help the FBI arrest someone it didn’t want, thereby making the plea deal about something else?

In the days after the Benghazi attacks, Nakoula was arrested for violating the terms of his probation. Theoptics, coupled with the Obama administration’s attempts to blame the video for the deaths, clearly communicated that he was being punished for producing a “crude and disgusting video” that was critical of Islam. Unfortunately, the outrage Nakoula’s arrest generated in conservative circles actually played to the Obama administration’s advantage creating a distraction from the devastating truth.

Based on this explosive development, enough probable cause exists to investigate whether or not Eiad was involved in financing Nakoula’s video production. In this ABC News story filed just two days after the Benghazi attacks, it was revealed that the cost of the video was between $50,000 – $60,000 financed by his family in Egypt.

Just two weeks after Benghazi, Shoebat.com published a report about the claim by Nakoula that his “family” provided him with the funds to produce the video. As we wrote then, this “family” has not been located:

…if an Egyptian by the name of Nakoula Bacile Nakoula is blamed for angering over a billion Muslims, it would not be that difficult to find the entire family in Egypt, to include brothers, cousins, aunts, siblings wife, wives, ex-wives, mistresses, and pets, et. al., especially since the riots that spanned across 30 nations were sparked in Egypt.

In the Middle East, you are known by your clan. Yet, Egypt cannot produce neither this man’s family or his background?

Was Eiad the source of the $50,000 – $60,000? The Feds clearly couldn’t have their fingerprints on the money but two informants who were beholden to the Justice Department could. Is this why he wasn’t taken into custody when the Canadians offered him up?

Providing even further evidence that Nakoula’s video was about agitprop and blood libel are his initial claims about the source of his funding. According to the ABC News report above, Nakoula attempted to say the video cost $5 Million and was funded by a consortium of wealthy Jewish friends. This was clearly lie.

Eiad Salameh is a Muslim fundamentalist who hates Coptic Christians. If Nakoula was a Copt, why would Salameh partner with him? The answer is that Nakoula is a Muslim who used agitprop and blood libel as an agent of the Obama administration and its Justice Department.

Email Subscription

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,308 other followers

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.