“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.” ― Charles Darwin

"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."― Adolf Hitler

"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."― H. G. Wells

"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927

is not blue pilled bullshit is partially truewomen generally as they get older they become more gold diggers they start to think about their futurethey could date some ugly but prosperous incel which years ago would not have given him the hour of the day

It's partially true but it doesn't mean sex is dished out like free wine when a woman hits 35.

When you look like an old goat with saggy boobs, you can't make the demands on men's looks like you did at 18.

Women hate young, better looking competition, so older women have to pretend they're open to dating uglier men. It's all an act to appear nice and to reel in attention - something she's noticed she's not getting as much of as she did at 18.

Eugenicist wrote:Where/what do you think this blue pilled bullshit is referencing?

It's not bluepilled bullshit, it is true. A man's looks are the metric women use to assess his genetic quality, but once a woman is past her reproductive years, the man's genetics become irrelevant. A woman that is no longer of childbearing age wants a man that can provide resources to her existing offspring, not necessarily a man that is capable of producing genetically superior offspring.

Like above posters said, this doesn't mean that 45+yo women will dish out free sex, because old habits die hard. But 45+yo women certainly have less of a gut repulsion towards ugly guys than young fertile women have.

[img/]http://i58.tinypic.com/5uhenn.jpg[/img]

RodgerRabbit wrote:Trying to fix yourself is literally a race against the clock. It's a catch 22. By the time you've fixed all the flaws that prevented you from slaying, you will have lost the one thing most essential to slaying in the first place -- youth.

NewGenious119 wrote:This idea that nobody owes anyone anything completely goes against the entire point of even having a society in the first place. If society doesn't owe an individual person anything, then the individual owes society nothing either, so don't be surprised when they take their frustration out on the world.

There is absolutely NO GOOD reason why, in the 21st century, every person shouldn't have their basic needs met. That means food, shelter, clothing, and transportation for all and, yes, if you are a male, sexual access to attractive females as that is considered a basic need for men as well.

Leebyunghun wrote:The number one source of strife in human existence is the inequality of looks among the male species.

germanDream wrote:a woman would fuck a cute dog or horse over an average faced man ANY day of the week. its not even close. women are repulsed by non male model men

PuaKiller wrote:Most women couldn't last a month as an incel male. They'd suicide. Prostitution would be legal worldwide and virgin shaming would cease if women were put in the shoes of an incel male for even a month. They couldn't handle it.

firehaze wrote:If a girl has never made it obvious that she likes you then you're a lot more subhuman than you think.

Eugenicist wrote:Where/what do you think this blue pilled bullshit is referencing?

It's not bluepilled bullshit, it is true. A man's looks are the metric women use to assess his genetic quality, but once a woman is past her reproductive years, the man's genetics become irrelevant. A woman that is no longer of childbearing age wants a man that can provide resources to her existing offspring, not necessarily a man that is capable of producing genetically superior offspring.

Like above posters said, this doesn't mean that 45+yo women will dish out free sex, because old habits die hard. But 45+yo women certainly have less of a gut repulsion towards ugly guys than young fertile women have.

ihateallwomen wrote:When females are old and used up they marry betas for financial stability and try to fuck chads on the side. Either secretly or openly through "open relationships".

I don't disagree with this. Women have an inborn impulse/ geno-ingrained to pendulum their self worth based on how much PRIMAL VALUE they got. It's a fucked up deal, brought from our inner instincts. Primal capital (LMS, Prominence, Power, Prowess, being the dominant prodigy, and making all these things like LMS delivered/ exemplified in a way that makes the notion that we SHOULD define ourselves by these things concrete... when people get pushed, hurt, fall victim to the cutting-edge of human judgment/ punishment/ wanton derogation for their own gratification) is what they're drawn to. They groom themselves with makeup/ plucking hairs to get the right hairline, poisoning themselves for the right skin texture... just so that they can qualify for Alphas/ Chads who possess HIGH primal capital. Where their system of esteeming other people in general rests completely on the primarchy/ glamorarchy/ corporeal hierarchy. They WANT to qualify for the myopic assholes of the world, because women subconsciously know the world is base, animalistic, knuckleheaded. They tacitly approve of it being that way, by trying to qualify for these people by focusing on their looks/ guys who will be base as opposed to being humanitarian and helping other people (for genuine reasons, not feminism). They believe this world is a base place, where anyone with high primal capital is able to control anything they want, and will not be generous. Women would rather be on top of the viciously competitive system... becuase they themselves even until their death bed... probably want to be on top of it more than they want to fix it so that everyone will eb happy. So they let the fucked up system pervade.

It is the inborn default setting point of most animals, especially tribal mammals to model their inner metric of self worth by viscerally annexing our emotions, mind, soul around the oscillation of the absence (negative self opinion) and presence (positive self opinion) of how much primal capital they have. It's our biology's mental subconscious commentary on the way the universe functions... because we are dominantly wired to like chads, dominant jackasses, then that tacitly explains that we think those people get away with being unjust in the world, and generally fuck the world up. While morality/ justice is just a trivial afterthought. A bleakly built cumulative course of observation. No matter how positive or yuppy happy a girl's viewpoints are, she's still subconsciously aware of the way this universe works. We all have a bleakly built cumulative course of observing and hypothesizing. That's why our heedfulness leans in on repressing the negatives more than enjoying the positives in our everyday life. Especially if you're a vulnerable girl getting eyefucked daily by incels. So it makes sense they'd go for chads, because of their primal capital, and the respect, recognition, reliability their traits/ properties have in the judgment system/ evaluation system of peers/ people. If not out of joy, and seeking the positives which come with, then repressing the negatives of shame, sadness, rape, low status on the girl's part. It just adds up. And ends up with the universe imposing its own unfair nature upon us all.

Eugenicist wrote:Where/what do you think this blue pilled bullshit is referencing?

It's not bluepilled bullshit, it is true. A man's looks are the metric women use to assess his genetic quality, but once a woman is past her reproductive years, the man's genetics become irrelevant. A woman that is no longer of childbearing age wants a man that can provide resources to her existing offspring, not necessarily a man that is capable of producing genetically superior offspring.

Like above posters said, this doesn't mean that 45+yo women will dish out free sex, because old habits die hard. But 45+yo women certainly have less of a gut repulsion towards ugly guys than young fertile women have.

Women are eugenicists enthusiasts. They think their advocacy of it doesn't overlap over their humanitarianism. Femfail. Women are humanitarian in their conscious self-concept, and are completely unaware of their FAR more geno-ingrained eugenics advocacy/ self-centric primal capitalism proclivities (than humanitarianism) becuase women choose to only be conscious of what flaws they have IF it helps them gain social status/ helps their agenda. (Remember women pendulum their indulgence/ consideration of things based on the context of how it feels, more consideration for good feelings, less consideration if it feels bad/ gets filtered out). Plus they are maternal/ weak spirited. They can't have their conscience bother them with an established flaw where FIXING it would make them correct it in a way that would be offputting/ weird to people. Women adapt their habits in accordance with what gives them prominence first and foremost, because they derive their feelings primarily from being important and self-assured by the real scale of value they feel society defines people by/ good universal vibrations from. Their self centric desire for that shows they can't really own up to their own flaws, only if it brings them the feelings they're after, where it would have to become a trend to be redpilled. The only reason humanitarian has gained momentum in the collective mindset of women is because it's popular.

Eugenicist wrote:Where/what do you think this blue pilled bullshit is referencing?

It's not bluepilled bullshit, it is true. A man's looks are the metric women use to assess his genetic quality, but once a woman is past her reproductive years, the man's genetics become irrelevant. A woman that is no longer of childbearing age wants a man that can provide resources to her existing offspring, not necessarily a man that is capable of producing genetically superior offspring.

Like above posters said, this doesn't mean that 45+yo women will dish out free sex, because old habits die hard. But 45+yo women certainly have less of a gut repulsion towards ugly guys than young fertile women have.

Because 3DFA is obsessed with posts and discussions that he hates when people delete their posts because it makes the whole topic unreadable. So you can delete and edit posts on Shitty Advice but after like 10 days you can't edit or delete the posts anymore. Similar to lookism where you can't delete any of your posts but you can edit them. Why don't you just edit out the whole paragraph and keep the part I put in bold only?

Eugenicist wrote:I don't disagree with this. Women have an inborn impulse/ geno-ingrained to pendulum their self worth based on how much PRIMAL VALUE they got. It's a fucked up deal, brought from our inner instincts. Primal capital (LMS, Prominence, Power, Prowess, being the dominant prodigy, and making all these things like LMS delivered/ exemplified in a way that makes the notion that we SHOULD define ourselves by these things concrete... when people get pushed, hurt, fall victim to the cutting-edge of human judgment/ punishment/ wanton derogation for their own gratification) is what they're drawn to. They groom themselves with makeup/ plucking hairs to get the right hairline, poisoning themselves for the right skin texture... just so that they can qualify for Alphas/ Chads who possess HIGH primal capital. Where their system of esteeming other people in general rests completely on the primarchy/ glamorarchy/ corporeal hierarchy. They WANT to qualify for the myopic assholes of the world, because women subconsciously know the world is base, animalistic, knuckleheaded. They tacitly approve of it being that way, by trying to qualify for these people by focusing on their looks/ guys who will be base as opposed to being humanitarian and helping other people (for genuine reasons, not feminism). They believe this world is a base place, where anyone with high primal capital is able to control anything they want, and will not be generous. Women would rather be on top of the viciously competitive system... becuase they themselves even until their death bed... probably want to be on top of it more than they want to fix it so that everyone will eb happy. So they let the fucked up system pervade.

It is the inborn default setting point of most animals, especially tribal mammals to model their inner metric of self worth by viscerally annexing our emotions, mind, soul around the oscillation of the absence (negative self opinion) and presence (positive self opinion) of how much primal capital they have. It's our biology's mental subconscious commentary on the way the universe functions... because we are dominantly wired to like chads, dominant jackasses, then that tacitly explains that we think those people get away with being unjust in the world, and generally fuck the world up. While morality/ justice is just a trivial afterthought. A bleakly built cumulative course of observation. No matter how positive or yuppy happy a girl's viewpoints are, she's still subconsciously aware of the way this universe works. We all have a bleakly built cumulative course of observing and hypothesizing. That's why our heedfulness leans in on repressing the negatives more than enjoying the positives in our everyday life. Especially if you're a vulnerable girl getting eyefucked daily by incels. So it makes sense they'd go for chads, because of their primal capital, and the respect, recognition, reliability their traits/ properties have in the judgment system/ evaluation system of peers/ people. If not out of joy, and seeking the positives which come with, then repressing the negatives of shame, sadness, rape, low status on the girl's part. It just adds up. And ends up with the universe imposing its own unfair nature upon us all.

absolutely correct.

I hate to say it, but nearly everything you write is profoundly insightful and you articulated in words which I've been always sensing and feeling about the world and society in general over the years. It's a great relief from all the "intellectual masturbation" we have which are mainly idiots discussing tediously and making mountains out of molehills. It's really nice to read someone who has the intelligence to post insightful observations.

Eugenicist wrote:I don't disagree with this. Women have an inborn impulse/ geno-ingrained to pendulum their self worth based on how much PRIMAL VALUE they got. It's a fucked up deal, brought from our inner instincts. Primal capital (LMS, Prominence, Power, Prowess, being the dominant prodigy, and making all these things like LMS delivered/ exemplified in a way that makes the notion that we SHOULD define ourselves by these things concrete... when people get pushed, hurt, fall victim to the cutting-edge of human judgment/ punishment/ wanton derogation for their own gratification) is what they're drawn to. They groom themselves with makeup/ plucking hairs to get the right hairline, poisoning themselves for the right skin texture... just so that they can qualify for Alphas/ Chads who possess HIGH primal capital. Where their system of esteeming other people in general rests completely on the primarchy/ glamorarchy/ corporeal hierarchy. They WANT to qualify for the myopic assholes of the world, because women subconsciously know the world is base, animalistic, knuckleheaded. They tacitly approve of it being that way, by trying to qualify for these people by focusing on their looks/ guys who will be base as opposed to being humanitarian and helping other people (for genuine reasons, not feminism). They believe this world is a base place, where anyone with high primal capital is able to control anything they want, and will not be generous. Women would rather be on top of the viciously competitive system... becuase they themselves even until their death bed... probably want to be on top of it more than they want to fix it so that everyone will eb happy. So they let the fucked up system pervade.

It is the inborn default setting point of most animals, especially tribal mammals to model their inner metric of self worth by viscerally annexing our emotions, mind, soul around the oscillation of the absence (negative self opinion) and presence (positive self opinion) of how much primal capital they have. It's our biology's mental subconscious commentary on the way the universe functions... because we are dominantly wired to like chads, dominant jackasses, then that tacitly explains that we think those people get away with being unjust in the world, and generally fuck the world up. While morality/ justice is just a trivial afterthought. A bleakly built cumulative course of observation. No matter how positive or yuppy happy a girl's viewpoints are, she's still subconsciously aware of the way this universe works. We all have a bleakly built cumulative course of observing and hypothesizing. That's why our heedfulness leans in on repressing the negatives more than enjoying the positives in our everyday life. Especially if you're a vulnerable girl getting eyefucked daily by incels. So it makes sense they'd go for chads, because of their primal capital, and the respect, recognition, reliability their traits/ properties have in the judgment system/ evaluation system of peers/ people. If not out of joy, and seeking the positives which come with, then repressing the negatives of shame, sadness, rape, low status on the girl's part. It just adds up. And ends up with the universe imposing its own unfair nature upon us all.

absolutely correct.

I hate to say it, but nearly everything you write is profoundly insightful and you articulated in words which I've been always sensing and feeling about the world and society in general over the years. It's a great relief from all the "intellectual masturbation" we have which are mainly idiots discussing tediously and making mountains out of molehills. It's really nice to read someone who has the intelligence to post insightful observations.

The common psychtrack of people is to impress. They stop in an arbitrary avenue where they believe their interests/ need for status is safe; when their essential interests made secure/ apprehended/ prominent in a way that benefits them above the expense of stress, hard work, mental exertion. Every alt-right site I go on that tries to impress insight falls short to me. And definitely isn't enough to give the people the headway they need to defeat the system they're trying to undo.

I've found that mentally exertive activity, synced with your soul/ your heart/ your compass of quality and competent development completely will ensure creative genius. It's just that most people are too lazy and self-doubtful to drudge long enough in any uncomfortable exertion without the palatable release of comfort. And people's mode/ capacity of exertion, and stress from exertion come from multitudes of factors.

Typically/ commonly/ endemically people only try to exert for the sake of status, to gain the primal capital necessary so as to gain their real gratification... Narcissistic Contentment. And they will only exert enough mentally until they reach that set-point of contentment... even IF they aren't of the real value they'd prefer. But it wouldn't matter, because people will laurel themselves as valuable while putting their inferiorities under the rug/ subconscious top secret cold storage.

You need to push yourself. You need to become mentally unperturbed and unfatigued by exertion towards capitalizing on yourself in the best way possible. One should not be like other people who only exert until they can impress their peers. People's primal motive/ psychdrive is primarily predicated on status. For me, it's something far more different. I have a passion for the material. I do not use it for hte sake of achieving another end solely.

I almost always gain more from independent insight metareflecting on my own experiences than mind-drilling my piles of books or even on the internet. It's sad honestly. Not many people then must be able to voice their hatreds of the dynamics in the universe at play like I can, even if their hatred was just visceral. Most people in the world have a blunt/ brutish anger. Patient hatred is always better than raging anger. For the former you need willpower. I want insight, status may come after but it's not a chronic leap like it is for most normies. For a time it was for me. But I learned that refining my game I run with rumination that I may become unstoppable. I hold willpower up as an ideal, which unfortunately is necessary for insight in our society that advocates daisyficating denial for the sake of communist/ socialist/ backwards rule disguised as humanitarianism. Every teacher in academia will overemphasize the liberation that books will give you... which is a flowerful fallacy... unless you're stupid enough to agree with the communist bullshit/ leftist daisyfied schematheme that lay within them.

At least 99% of this species, EVEN while we can geno splice and send people to mars (theoretically) doesn't have mental capacity to merit over their geno-ingrained impulses. Almost everyone is utterly dominated by them and cannot traverse their way out of them any better than a rabid wolf can find it's way from being carnivorous.

Women have a historically absurd amount of attention / vanity / sexual value they can indulge in and they don't want to relinquish it with a pregnancy. There's also no period in history where they physically haven't needed a male provider as government will do that for them now; just be a single unemployed mom on welfare and you get to the top of the housing list, whilst young working class men with jobs are rooted to the bottom. They think they're winning but on the backend of life they pay severely. They want to enjoy their sexual value while pretending they have a great skill set to offer society. Then they act shocked when men stop giving them attention with age - starting between 30-39, then dropping like a led zeppelin at 40.

They have a much higher need for social stimulation and obsession with rank (which they don't realize most of it was due to being a young female once upon a time) so they can't handle isolation with age like men can either.

After a certain age one of the things that women hate most is that they effectively become invisible to HANDSOME and mid-range men. No IOIs, no attention, nothing. Drives them insane. Hitting the wall and having no babies yet does fuck women up mentally, but It's so easy for them to get laid regardless of age I don't feel sorry for any of them.

Also if you examine folklore; where do you think the myth of the old ugly witch, together with a black cat, grey hair, crooked nose, unhinged unkind voices, looked bad and a nasty crazy crackling laugh (who is always casting spells on younger women she hates) comes from ?

Childless unmarried women who lost or squandered their prime years SMV from generations past.

Mewtant wrote:Women have a historically absurd amount of attention / vanity / sexual value they can indulge in and they don't want to relinquish it with a pregnancy. There's also no period in history where they physically haven't needed a male provider as government will do that for them now; just be a single unemployed mom on welfare and you get to the top of the housing list, whilst young working class men with jobs are rooted to the bottom. They think they're winning but on the backend of life they pay severely. They want to enjoy their sexual value while pretending they have a great skill set to offer society. Then they act shocked when men stop giving them attention with age - starting between 30-39, then dropping like a led zeppelin at 40.

They have a much higher need for social stimulation and obsession with rank (which they don't realize most of it was due to being a young female once upon a time) so they can't handle isolation with age like men can either.

After a certain age one of the things that women hate most is that they effectively become invisible to HANDSOME and mid-range men. No IOIs, no attention, nothing. Drives them insane. Hitting the wall and having no babies yet does fuck women up mentally, but It's so easy for them to get laid regardless of age I don't feel sorry for any of them.

Everything women process/ emphasize/ discern is directed by the sense of entitlement/ vanity. I don't believe jack shit about them being humanitarian/ trying to take the sense of entitlement away from whites. Like star wars director cuck rian johnson. That mfer needs the social capital from virtue veneering. Imagine if his effeminate sense of self esteem acted anti-establishment. He'd go back to feeling inadequate.

Women have a thinking process that goes to fatalistic extremes. They need to be mentally stimulated to great degrees for them to make it in life, and to combat the stresses/ issues of what comes in contact with their psyche. If they have a pimple on their nose = no value/ rejected by chads/ do not fit the criteria, obstacles, standards your ideal identity can. They get their strength from being insecure. Insecurity/ continual emotion is like an auto-combustible engine for getting shit done, but it's less discerning/ micromindful. Whereas thinking has a crank. You have to do more effort to think/ to

Women have the same inner criticism as directed/ extreme/ intense/ thorough as what their ideal identity accomplishes. Which implies that it will be extremely severe, because the whole point of being a bad ass, elite, cool person, thoroughly and distinctively beautiful/ tough is that you are amazing and can be seen as valuable in the octogon dimension census view of the traits you want to be seen as valuable in. Looks, money, status, etc. All the primalescent traits. This makes all and every one of them insecure, as when there is no self-appreciation, there is self-flagellation.

It's almost universal that our self criticism as a human race is severe in relation to those around us. While we don't hold people we expect less from in such disrepute. We're more likely to judge ourselves harshly than others because we are the ones who want to be better than them. Thus have a higher expectation/ need for superiority. The greater you want to be, the more thorough and intense the criticism. And most of us want to be great, where our ideal identity is pillared around being a primal prodigy. And we are viscerally tied to this condition as a primalescent species. One that wants to be better than othersi n these regards.

Typically the intensity with humanity is constant and impactful the more the self criticism is aimed at something on the primal trait-channels, and the more severe it will get the greater the disparity is from the primalescent ideal with what substance is truly possessed. Like a caucasian nose with a black nose. That would matter more to a black girl than a mole on the side of her ass. More of her ideal identity self-projections that cycle and roll around in her brain are centered on having good angular features. Her emotions are pendulumed around this severely, compared to different irregulations iwth her life, because of her vain-ideal existence. It's kind of like a cat being clean through licking its own body vs. being clean when it takes a bath. Both are the same, but one method is more ideal in its geno programming. A woman can be imperfect in some ways, but one type of imperfection is an anathema.

Mewtant wrote:Women have a historically absurd amount of attention / vanity / sexual value they can indulge in and they don't want to relinquish it with a pregnancy. There's also no period in history where they physically haven't needed a male provider as government will do that for them now; just be a single unemployed mom on welfare and you get to the top of the housing list, whilst young working class men with jobs are rooted to the bottom. They think they're winning but on the backend of life they pay severely. They want to enjoy their sexual value while pretending they have a great skill set to offer society. Then they act shocked when men stop giving them attention with age - starting between 30-39, then dropping like a led zeppelin at 40.

They have a much higher need for social stimulation and obsession with rank (which they don't realize most of it was due to being a young female once upon a time) so they can't handle isolation with age like men can either.

After a certain age one of the things that women hate most is that they effectively become invisible to HANDSOME and mid-range men. No IOIs, no attention, nothing. Drives them insane. Hitting the wall and having no babies yet does fuck women up mentally, but It's so easy for them to get laid regardless of age I don't feel sorry for any of them.

Soul-Sustenance... Soulstenance for women is vanity. That is the one true nutriment to the nucleus of their inner essence.

Women are obsessed with rank when it comes to the hierarchies that bear resemblance/ evaluation/ compartmentalization/ relation with the circumperception of society on the traits that THEY want to have for themselves. There is probably some power rangers group/ magic the gathering group where everyone has their own rank registry in accordance with their high lv. character. But women will not give a shit. Whereas there is a fashion trend that will become a benchmark to the traits overlapping into their umbrella of traitchannels essential to their ideal identity/ circumperception of the traits they wanna have to shelter their ego/proper self perception. A fashion trend where if you don't have certain clothes, a man like this, etc. then the perception of her by society's regulations will conflict with the ideal identity trait-set she wants to have for herself.

That's why some white girls. especially in the 80s-90s. went with blacks when their image was protected before the dawn of the internet. Because they wanted the social capital of being "different/ non-traditional/ broad minded". Even at the expense of the gene-structure that makes her happy to be her, in having angular features.

Women will follow what indicates their ideal identity, which is always vain. Women want to be the high status/ high value oppressor in all social engagements. Where the primalescent consideration that abstracts the power, predation, prowess of people is the only line by which people are deserving of esteem. (Which is the case 99% of the time). All women hunger for this power, they have this kick. If you're incel you can't fulfill it. And if she's sapiosexual then once every full moon, she'll track back to being a wereslut. Every girl is a Werewhore/ Werewhore. You're not gonna win by bond/ inner essence comptability capital alone. You need primalescent capital. LMS.

All becuase of the inner preference of identity (geno-proclivity/ ego-format) to get gratification/ security/ self-appreciation only by the trait-channel of being elitists/ collectively dismissive to anything not of primalescent value/to have their system of consideration come off at elitist. All of the people who try to act like they're truly humanitarian/ loving/ sapiosexual/ inner-essence-centric not primalescence-centric in their system of esteem... bullshit. People's spoken stance depends on what energy they want to advocate (transparently btw) not what they truly believe. In our blue pilled bullshit culture today, people will continue to leave negativity numbed and not neutralized. People, women especially, don't want the problems of the world to be fixed/ neutralized. Their nucleus of their modality is vanity. They want them to be CONCEALED so that the residual pressures around us in this faux-humanitarian feminist bullshit culture can pervade. While veneering the real focus of vices on white men and the alleged patriarchy.In my opinion the nucleus of all issues negative... are on the self-serving sociopathic psychsleights of women.

also women which are not really gold diggers care about looks less as they get olderin their 20s they start to realize they can't retain good looking guys for serious purposes due those guys have lot of options

those women back to reality will dump a good looking guy after a long frustrated time trying to make such guy to committhen of course they try to find an uglier guy which compensates the lack of looks with economic stability + the desire of a stable pussy /form a family

also women which are not really gold diggers care about looks less as they get olderin their 20s they start to realize they can't retain good looking guys for serious purposes due those guys have lot of options

those women back to reality will dump a good looking guy after a long frustrated time trying to make such guy to committhen of course they try to find an uglier guy which compensates the lack of looks with economic stability + the desire of a stable pussy /form a family

This is how most middle-class families are formed

Good aesthetic genes matter far more to people than being well learned/ intelligent. The only way people of the latter rank over the good-gened is through bill gates/ STEM means, and even then, there aren't a lot of frontiers or untapped methods by which intelligent people haven't wormed through and exploited already. At this point going from peasant to privileged is by genes/ cam model/ gold digging and enticing the already high class individual into believing you are special because of your bodygonic traits that make you seem more... special than the everyday common rabble.

Women choose to lens their mindscope around pigeonholing all value primalescently. LMS centric. Women know the only valid means in life is genetics/ being of value in the community/ all society. You can't do much to topple the human race and get your vanity-sustenance as a single individual through crushing them down unless you machiavelli your way through them. Women sync with the census and subvert their psyches with primalescent persuasion. Such as their own Looks. And their geno-ingrained cynicism isn't an unreliable realism. It's actually very true. People are primalescent. It was the main reason society comes together, other than cooperation for survival.

Everything that doesn't lead up to domination with women, in the consideration of the real-world application of something is a trivial intangibility. IF you even get to women who will even be realistic. Most can't even introspect, extroceive properly to even grasp realism. AND it's another established proclivity that most women on average will discount and dismiss anything that doesn't give them happiness. Women are generally half-dwelt in the world of reality, or at least as realistically far as human perception can allow us. Women are only periodically processing reality in the hopes of dominating it, and then mending its conditions to fit what gives them self-esteem/ gratification/ etc. But you can't expect a woman to ever give a shit about anything you have to say if it doesn't lead to the external conditions following suit with her narcissistic fantasies.

This is what I call inapt realism lensed in Luxuriance. Being a black pilled realist is seen as an indicator of inferiority to girls. Women actually want men who don't have clear introspection, and are not really good at empathy. Women like it when men think that they can live/ make it off on their looks, primal capital/ position alone. All applications/ procedures that men have gone through/produce NEED to fit the inspection criteria of a woman's natural inference. Being intelligent/ insightful is a beta-status bypass mechanism, like humor. Women need to think that if men are hard working, at the gym, etc. then it can't be because of gymcelling motivation. It needs to be because she abstracts through inference/ inspection/ instinct/ evolutionary-vigilance that it's because the guy is acting on behalf of what I call the "Alphaclivity". The behavioral course which comes habitually to someone of the alpha geno-tier. The normie/alpha psychstructure behavior patterns. A woman needs to be able to abstract the reasons for someone doing something, and it must fall within that category. AND MOST OF IT IS GENETIC. An Alpha can BE HIMSELF and play magic the gathering/power rangers (so long as the aspie-aspect does not override the value of your genes, but genes good enough is often insurmountable value)... AND STILL GET LAID becuase he's got all of the essentials. So her psychsequences of evaluation will be read in accordance with being worthy of association. The Woman will read the alphaclivity based on his genetics/ the life and primalescent power on the primarchy he has because of them. All in her constavaluation sequences. The Alphaclivity also leads to the Alphassumption of his existence. Whereas beta genes = Betassumption. Halo effect all over. But yes the alphaclivity is what women require from the behavior of their men ultimately.

And no, it's not about confidence, it's about dominance/ primalescence... unlike what the PUAtards would have you believe. Playing the chillheaded/ mellowminded game to attract women is definitely a betaclivity thing to do. At least if it's forced, but if it isn't then you're just being yourself... Which might but not often give you an edge in getting girls... if they find the warm cozy sympathy towards someone indifferent to the primarchy, and will want to find his way in his own beta-leagued-lifestyle(being himself). But that's only for the women who will probably find something else redeeming about him (something of not LMS, but of achievement, competence or some primal value)... but it's so rare that you ever meet a girl who doesn't have the primalescent system of gratification/ esteem/ relational self-comparison in her self worth/ criticism that she would pick a suitor for his inner essence/ bond/ spirit at the expense of all that. Remember, there neess to be something distinct about you to be chose, unless the girl has such a low self esteem that she'll just take anyone who won't call her fat or stupid. But those girls are probably so worthless that it wouldn't matter anyway.

It's not that you CAN'T do anything that isn't betaclined if you have beta-tier genes. But you will always vibe-off that way evolutionarily, and compartmentalized justly. And beta-tier genes will compartmentalize you in their mind-file/ female gratification-chess in a way that will keep your P away from her V. So while you will always be betaclined in the female mind no matter what, you can at least compound that (other than having economic power/ wealth) with being honorable, courteous, etc. But women have a cuntclivity every full moon, and will go after the primalescent. It's all a part of our inner primality as a vain-aimed species.

Eugenicist wrote:The common psychtrack of people is to impress. They stop in an arbitrary avenue where they believe their interests/ need for status is safe; when their essential interests made secure/ apprehended/ prominent in a way that benefits them above the expense of stress, hard work, mental exertion. Every alt-right site I go on that tries to impress insight falls short to me. And definitely isn't enough to give the people the headway they need to defeat the system they're trying to undo.

Trying to impress people was, to me, always a retarded thing to do. And if you aim to then your ambitions are pretty low to say the least.

Eugenicist wrote:I've found that mentally exertive activity, synced with your soul/ your heart/ your compass of quality and competent development completely will ensure creative genius. It's just that most people are too lazy and self-doubtful to drudge long enough in any uncomfortable exertion without the palatable release of comfort. And people's mode/ capacity of exertion, and stress from exertion come from multitudes of factors.

This is what I found to be the case, but it was mainly other issues in my life holding me back.

Eugenicist wrote:Typically/ commonly/ endemically people only try to exert for the sake of status, to gain the primal capital necessary so as to gain their real gratification... Narcissistic Contentment. And they will only exert enough mentally until they reach that set-point of contentment... even IF they aren't of the real value they'd prefer. But it wouldn't matter, because people will laurel themselves as valuable while putting their inferiorities under the rug/ subconscious top secret cold storage.

Most people, in my experience, just do enough to get by, which makes for lack-lustre attitude to their work, personal lives, commitments etc. . . they either don't know better or want to do better - they can't be bothered.

Eugenicist wrote:You need to push yourself. You need to become mentally unperturbed and unfatigued by exertion towards capitalizing on yourself in the best way possible. One should not be like other people who only exert until they can impress their peers. People's primal motive/ psychdrive is primarily predicated on status. For me, it's something far more different. I have a passion for the material. I do not use it for hte sake of achieving another end solely.

Impressing your peers is a dead end. I have never cared for that - only the truth matters to me, so as long as the truth is arrived at the effort was worth it in my value system. also trying to impress your peers might make you aim far too low - and I refuse to lower my standards. Why would you want to impress your peers anyway? All the great men who produced profound work surpassed their peers and were initially misunderstood by them for some time, and these men of distinction couldn't be bothered to lower them so their "peers" could catch up. . .

Eugenicist wrote:I almost always gain more from independent insight metareflecting on my own experiences than mind-drilling my piles of books or even on the internet. It's sad honestly. Not many people then must be able to voice their hatreds of the dynamics in the universe at play like I can, even if their hatred was just visceral. Most people in the world have a blunt/ brutish anger. Patient hatred is always better than raging anger. For the former you need willpower. I want insight, status may come after but it's not a chronic leap like it is for most normies. For a time it was for me. But I learned that refining my game I run with rumination that I may become unstoppable. I hold willpower up as an ideal, which unfortunately is necessary for insight in our society that advocates daisyficating denial for the sake of communist/ socialist/ backwards rule disguised as humanitarianism. Every teacher in academia will overemphasize the liberation that books will give you... which is a flowerful fallacy... unless you're stupid enough to agree with the communist bullshit/ leftist daisyfied schematheme that lay within them.

Books, written words, etc. . . are like anything. Most are crap and are not worth the paper, webpage, notebook they are written on. They are just records and mediums of communication - that's all. All because something is written in a book does not make it true. All because someone says something does not make it true. It's up to the reader/observer to decide and think as to what makes sense or not.

Society has gone full retard because of liberals and feminists having their say when really they have nothing to say apart from their tedious virtue and status signalling. All this shaming of people who don't agree with them or trying to outdo each other in the caring and humanitarian stakes is getting pretty lame and contrived.

Eugenicist wrote:Everything women process/ emphasize/ discern is directed by the sense of entitlement/ vanity. I don't believe jack shit about them being humanitarian/ trying to take the sense of entitlement away from whites. Like star wars director cuck rian johnson. That mfer needs the social capital from virtue veneering. Imagine if his effeminate sense of self esteem acted anti-establishment. He'd go back to feeling inadequate.

I knew the new Star Wars film was going to be a huge disappointment that I REFUSED to pay to watch it at the cinema!!!

Even The Force Awakens was a POS. What do I care to have an ugly black guy play a storm trooper who turned, and a Mary Sue character who seem to be perfect in everything she does? A normal personal can see the PC and Feminist agenda a mile off!!!

The Last Jedi had Luke totally out of character, Leia doing a Mary Poppins, some ugly asian chick in some faux forced romance with the ugly black guy (none of it seemed natural at all, completely contrived and unnecessary to the pacing and plot of the film to say the least), all in the name of "diversity", and let's make sure that the female lead kicks ass because, you know, she's female and "girl power"!!!

Even I called rian johnson a cuck and a mfer for ruining all the magic of Star Wars for me. JJ Abrams was bad but this was much worse.

Eugenicist wrote:Everything women process/ emphasize/ discern is directed by the sense of entitlement/ vanity. I don't believe jack shit about them being humanitarian/ trying to take the sense of entitlement away from whites. Like star wars director cuck rian johnson. That mfer needs the social capital from virtue veneering. Imagine if his effeminate sense of self esteem acted anti-establishment. He'd go back to feeling inadequate.

I knew the new Star Wars film was going to be a huge disappointment that I REFUSED to pay to watch it at the cinema!!!

Even The Force Awakens was a POS. What do I care to have an ugly black guy play a storm trooper who turned, and a Mary Sue character who seem to be perfect in everything she does? A normal personal can see the PC and Feminist agenda a mile off!!!

The Last Jedi had Luke totally out of character, Leia doing a Mary Poppins, some ugly asian chick in some faux forced romance with the ugly black guy (none of it seemed natural at all, completely contrived and unnecessary to the pacing and plot of the film to say the least), all in the name of "diversity", and let's make sure that the female lead kicks ass because, you know, she's female and "girl power"!!!

Even I called rian johnson a cuck and a mfer for ruining all the magic of Star Wars for me. JJ Abrams was bad but this was much worse.

This movie was definitely the phantom menace of this trilogy. Movies have an uncanny knack for being proud of its worst traits and slowly creeping up to epitomize them. These people at Disney, Cuntleen Kennedy, etc. seem like they're non-sentient retards going on auto-run. Political correctness is a trend that is too complex for people to dissect and unravel, which is why its momentum hasn't and cannot clow. Which is strange because I picked up on it when I was like 10. Thing is, I couldn't stop it because this sloppy/ sluggy stance of humanitarianism that PC is is highly driven on emotion; you can't oppose it without an avalanche of outburst. How can people be this stupid to not realize that the Jews/ Popular media moguls are just trying to fuck us over by saying that the worst essences they're trying to promote are being veneered as victims deserving of our pity? The victim veneration veneer hierarchy. Where even a cuck like Rian Johnson has more social proof than a Chad. It's something that the beta-inclined mind can latch onto for the sake of getting its narcissistic gratification through plebby methods.

Episode 7-9 should have been way WAY more epic than this shit. The prequels are poorly executed genius. But to me, I grew up with them and love them. Aside from Kylo ren, nothing in this entire trilogy was of value. Star Wars is supposed to be an event. Now it's like an annual mortuary check up of a dying franchise like us get to dissect.

Every single girl you like already has 15 men on her phone texting her everyday, sending pictures of their dicks, and she can have sex with any of them any time she wants. They got another 30 men doing it on Facebook. All these Chads messaging them and texting them. You’re supposed to compete with that? There's no way you can win because you don't have the right face. Why even try?

Prophecy1933 wrote:Every single girl you like already has 15 men on her phone texting her everyday, sending pictures of their dicks, and she can have sex with any of them any time she wants. They got another 30 men doing it on Facebook. All these Chads messaging them and texting them. You’re supposed to compete with that? There's no way you can win because you don't have the right face. Why even try?

Better to be angry and find something in your beta-instilled patient hatred.

Who is the world to deny you what you're rightfully destined for? Who is to even ask a follow-up question to your question to defy the establishment of the precedence of your question to existence? THIS IS OUR WORLD.

Eugenicist wrote:You need to push yourself. You need to become mentally unperturbed and unfatigued by exertion towards capitalizing on yourself in the best way possible. One should not be like other people who only exert until they can impress their peers. People's primal motive/ psychdrive is primarily predicated on status. For me, it's something far more different. I have a passion for the material. I do not use it for hte sake of achieving another end solely.

Impressing your peers is a dead end. I have never cared for that - only the truth matters to me, so as long as the truth is arrived at the effort was worth it in my value system. also trying to impress your peers might make you aim far too low - and I refuse to lower my standards. Why would you want to impress your peers anyway? All the great men who produced profound work surpassed their peers and were initially misunderstood by them for some time, and these men of distinction couldn't be bothered to lower them so their "peers" could catch up. . .

Eugenicist wrote:I almost always gain more from independent insight metareflecting on my own experiences than mind-drilling my piles of books or even on the internet. It's sad honestly. Not many people then must be able to voice their hatreds of the dynamics in the universe at play like I can, even if their hatred was just visceral. Most people in the world have a blunt/ brutish anger. Patient hatred is always better than raging anger. For the former you need willpower. I want insight, status may come after but it's not a chronic leap like it is for most normies. For a time it was for me. But I learned that refining my game I run with rumination that I may become unstoppable. I hold willpower up as an ideal, which unfortunately is necessary for insight in our society that advocates daisyficating denial for the sake of communist/ socialist/ backwards rule disguised as humanitarianism. Every teacher in academia will overemphasize the liberation that books will give you... which is a flowerful fallacy... unless you're stupid enough to agree with the communist bullshit/ leftist daisyfied schematheme that lay within them.

Books, written words, etc. . . are like anything. Most are crap and are not worth the paper, webpage, notebook they are written on. They are just records and mediums of communication - that's all. All because something is written in a book does not make it true. All because someone says something does not make it true. It's up to the reader/observer to decide and think as to what makes sense or not.

Society has gone full retard because of liberals and feminists having their say when really they have nothing to say apart from their tedious virtue and status signalling. All this shaming of people who don't agree with them or trying to outdo each other in the caring and humanitarian stakes is getting pretty lame and contrived.

Yes, people who were different/ esoteric were not trend dwellers. They were intrinsically motivated to do the work. Which is an impressive coincidental neuro/geno-wiring format. A lot of people are just uneducated/ philistine niggers.

Yes, the unfortunate majority is that people don't understand that intelligence isn't some armchair past-time or even a purely geno-ingrained capacity you have. It's effort, time, conciseness, willpower, etc. That can't be mistaken or shortcircuited. It's an inner immaterial trait that can only be ingrained by substance. Only things external can be made deception. Just like the inner self-concept. Self serving delusions are a deception. But deceptions need substance behind them. And substance cannot be gained by deception with the inner essence. Genuine substance anyway. Although the internet provides much, eventually you have to stick to your guns and push intellectually.