A bit late on the thread -- I concur with Jaromil -- a fair, well-written, and
inclusive (as far as that goes) account of the list, kudos for taking the time
to compose it. Age does (productively or not) bring on reflection on the past,
and at two decades, well, it's now a collective history. Thanks, Felix ( {AT} 305
posts under no pseudonym) & Ted ( {AT} 351 posts under no pseudonym) (1600 under the
'nettime ...' rubric)

I'm wondering if there are any deeper stats available -- in retrospect -- such
as subscriber numbers over time; posts over time, etc... My email archive shows
22600 entries ... but I had a few gaps of some months over the course of the
almost 20 years...