'We're taught to think very badly of selfishness but in truth, completely obliterating ourselves and living only for others and their wants (as it can be so easy to do) may be a fast route to depression and inner numbness. We may need – on occasion – to do something that sounds rather surprising: relearn how to be beautifully and intelligently selfish.' -- Depression is the reward we get for being 'good'. ~ Marshall B. Rosenberg

"If you want to cure a woman of 'Social Justice', you knock her up...[She'll] have her own family to take care of rather than trying to pretend she can mother West Chicago...Social Justice Warrior stuff comes out of women because women love to take care of people...they're nurturers and protectors, and they are easy to manipulate that way...Women are wonderful, and when women's nurturing and caring is pointed towards its proper end – which their own children – they're a powerful force of nature and the foundation of civilization. When women don't have kids then those maternal tentacles latch onto other things, and one of the things they latch onto is poor people... To reorientate women's caregiving nature towards their own children is the best way to get them to act in ways that are actually going to bring them happiness."

'1:06:18 Stand Alone, or Pick a side?' "History is not kind to the Individualist. Usually, the pendulum of history swings from the Absolutists to the Communists. Individualism and freedom make bright pops, you'll see freedom burst out and propel humanity forward unimaginably, but then the Commies and the Absolutists come in and fuck it up and pull us back down... There a reason for this too: Commies and Absolutists have no problem killing their opposition. If you aren't a Commie then you're a Nazi and we must kill you. If you're degenerate then we must throw you from a rooftop. Both sides have no problme killing their opposition. But the Individualists, because they value freedom, they don't. So the Capitalist and the Individualists – they're the live-and-let-live, let's just make the world a better place – they're the ones making the world better but the Communists hate them because they're losers and they want their shit, and the Absolutists hate them because they're losers and they don't worships their God. And, so, they're going to come for you and because you don't kill them, they eventually win. It's like the way the Left uses your principles against you: Because the Individualist values freedom, they don't seek to enslave or murder other people for different beliefs. Individualists are perfectly happy living alongside Communists and Absolutists as long as they get left alone... [And Communists and Absolutists] are fine with that for a while until they have the numbers. Once they have the numbers, suddenly you're the bad guy... And you need to go." -- "It's like the Voltaire quote: 'I may not agree with what you have say but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.' That is the fatal flaw of Individualism is they tolerate their opposition whereas the other sides don't." -- "I just want to be left alone, but I can't. In fact, both sides will tell you why: The Communist Left will tell you they can't leave you alone because you owe them your property – nor can you just give them your property and leave – they can't let you leave either because they need to take your property continuously; they need you to work so they can feed off you like a parasite, so they can't let you leave and they can't leave you alone – they must impose upon you because they require you to be their slave. And the Absolutist Right can't leave you alone because they need to impose their beliefs and their axioms of non-degenerate living upon you."

"On the U.S. border, children are being bought, sold, rented, recycled and kidnapped, mostly by men from Central America as they know this will gain [their customers] quick release and access to the country after illegally crossing the border...This trafficking of children, many of which will be prostituted in the United States, is being aided and abetted – as well as being encouraged by ... the Democratic Party as it is known around the world that if you arrive in the United States illegally you will be released quickly if you are travelling with a child. In their rush to virtue signal, the Democratic Party, the mainstream media and other usual suspects have created a humanitarian crisis on the border with a tidal wave of child victims; with the only thought being on the emotional optics, borders are painted as 'inhumane' when actually borders are what used to be used to keep communities and children safe."

'Sorry America, you can't have a country because women are crying in Spanish.' -- "If you bring your child to the commission of a crime, that's on you, that's not on the American taxpayer." -- Hypoagency doesn't care

'...According to a scholarly chapter on begging in the Routledge Handbook of Human Trafficking (2018), there is “no generalized analysis that applies to all begging situations”—and, ultimately, there are more critical aspects to be considered. -- First, the social disintegration that the continued presence of beggars creates. As observed by political scientist James Q. Wilson, who together with criminologist George Kelling conceived the “broken windows” theory that visible disorder in public spaces causes a decline in social capital and a rise in criminal behavior, in Thinking about Crime (1985), the “unchecked panhandler is, in effect, the first broken window.” Moreover, the constant exposure to the deception involved in begging, such as pretending disabilities or other personal difficulties, is detrimental to social trust and reciprocity. -- Secondly, but not least important, there is the debasement to the beggars themselves and the risk that the daily sight of people kneeling and sleeping in the streets will cause a mental separation of certain populations from the rest of society in the minds of ordinary citizens and teach our children that the dignity of the poor simply matters less. It has been estimated that approximately 70 percent of beggars in Oslo sleep outdoors. Victims of trafficking to Western Europe have also reported living in disused buses, abandoned houses, and other makeshift shelters lacking electric heat and running water. -- Yet despite the fact that begging is associated with these social hazards and degrading conditions, almost all Western European states, excluding, most prominently, Denmark, have hesitated to impose or strengthen the enforcement of national blanket bans on begging as a response to the influx of foreign vagrants. In 2018, the Swedish Supreme Court allowed local municipal bans, but even that measure was intensely controversial, and thus far only a handful of rural municipalities have declared that they will take advantage of the change in legislation. The political majorities of the country’s largest municipalities have continued to defer to the public debate, in which a potential ban on begging is falsely described as “banning poverty” and withholding legitimate income from a group of people with few other means of making a living. -- While such rhetoric, used by many journalists, intellectuals, and, incredibly, employees of human rights organizations, may sound appealing, it is, in fact, an example of cynicism masquerading as compassion, as we can learn from an insightful book by social thinker Myron Magnet, The Dream and the Nightmare: The Sixties’ Legacy to the Underclass (1993). -- Magnet offered startling insight into the social unraveling and poverty of 1980s and 1990s urban America, strangely coinciding with the boom years of U.S. capitalism. As in today’s Western Europe, the contrasts could be stark even within the same city block: "In New York City, directly under the windows of the treasure-crammed five-million-dollar apartments that loom over glittering Fifth Avenue, for instance, sleep the homeless, one and sometimes two to a park bench, haggard, usually ill, huddled in rags turned dead gray with dirt and wear. […] As for the urban parks and pillared train stations that speak of a once-confident civic pride and prosperity, how often are they now—graffitied, vandalized, reeking of human waste—but dreary gauntlets of beggary?" -- In Magnet’s judgment, these and other social pathologies, such as family breakdown in the African American community and the rise of a non-working urban underclass, were not due to lack of economic opportunity, which was greatly expanding at the time. Instead, they were an inheritance from the 1960s counterculture. In particular, Magnet pointed to the counterculture’s ethos of uninhibited individual freedom, its rejection of civilizing bourgeois norms and virtues, and the era’s celebration of victimhood mentality. Handed down by an elite of opinion makers, these new values “withdrew respect from the behavior and attitudes that have traditionally boosted people up the economic ladder” and encouraged those already on the margins of society to lead calamitous lives in the nation’s cities.'

'...What country in its right mind would jeopardise the lives of its citizens by inviting into its bosom an unrepentant jihadist from arguably the world’s most brutal terror organisation, there to live at enormous expense to the taxpayer, constantly needing to be monitored by the security services lest she radicalises others or plots some new atrocity of her own? -- I’ll tell you which country: Great Britain. -- Already the cries have arisen from the usual suspects: Max Hill QC, the new Director of Public Prosecutions believes that the focus on returning ISIS jihadis should be on “integration”; a lawyer called Tasnime Akunjee has said that Miss Begum – and her other surviving friend, if she makes it – should be treated as a “victim.” -- This is how liberal democracy slowly commits suicide – through the phenomenon known as “pathological altruism.” -- The state is now more interested in parading its moral virtue than it is in protecting its citizens. -- And because that state no longer listens to us, we are powerless to prevent our inexorable decline into chaos and oblivion.' -- Sugar and spice...

'...A fire service has been accused of discrimination after it was claimed that white men have to score higher in recruitment tests than women and people from ethnic minorities. -- When applying for a role at West Midlands Fire Service, they have to score 70 per cent in a verbal and numerical reasoning test to get through to the next round. -- But women and people from black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups need only 60 per cent. -- Bosses are also spending £2,500 a month on Facebook adverts targeted specifically at women, a whistleblower has claimed. -- The source, who did not want to be named, said the recruitment programme, introduced in late 2017, cost £100,000 a year. ‘This directly discriminates against white men,’ he said. ‘Not only are they discriminating against large parts of my community, but they are also using huge amounts of public money to do so. -- ‘It’s not fair on the members of the community who rightly expect the best people for the job will be selected to serve on the front line. It’s difficult to swallow knowing people have not been able to achieve their dream careers because they are too white or too male.’ -- The fire service, one of the biggest in the country, wants 60 per cent of new recruits to be women, and 35 per cent to be from black and minority ethnic (BME) groups by 2021, a leaked memo showed. -- The source claimed that, in a bid to reach the target, the pass rate had been altered to make it easier for people from those groups to get through the test.' -- Bigotry of low expectations

'The world is not a progressive utopia.' -- "This is why we have borders: to keep out violent criminals and terrorists. Borders work. Walls work. But if you import people from violent cultures and dangerous countries, your own society is going to become more violent and more dangerous. You can't argue with that fact."

'The latest fad in criminal-justice activism is the concept of “survival crime.” -- The theory holds that the homeless, the poor, and people of color commit property crimes and low-level infractions in order to secure their basic survival. Any enforcement of these laws is thus a violation of their basic human rights and should be relaxed – that is, local governments should stop enforcing any laws that “criminalize homelessness” and “criminalize poverty.” -- ...cities like Seattle and San Francisco have not just “decriminalized homelessness” or “decriminalized poverty”—they have increasingly decriminalized crime. Over the past five years, the classification of survival crime has expanded well beyond stealing the proverbial loaf of bread. In California, for instance, Proposition 47 downgraded theft of property valued at less than $950 to a misdemeanor, meaning that the police are unlikely to pursue even habitual shoplifters and thieves. The predictable result: a statewide rise in petty theft. Seattle and King County recently released new guidelines calling on police officers to stop arresting individuals for all “homelessness-related crimes,” with the goal of “eliminating racial disproportionality” and ensuring that policies “do not penalize homelessness and poverty.” Meantime, city and county prosecutors have dropped thousands of misdemeanor cases against “vulnerable populations.” All this has caused widespread frustration among residents and law enforcement officers. As one veteran Seattle cop told me: “We have basically stopped enforcing the law against the homeless population. Political leaders don’t want it and prosecutors won’t pursue charges. It’s a waste of time.” In New York City, the NYPD has backed off from arresting people for subway fare evasion, on the grounds that enforcement has a disparate impact on the poor; farebeating has risen sharply since the new policy was enacted. -- While concern is growing that these permissive policies have led to an increase in property crime, the greatest risk of survival crime theory is that we are slowly creating a parallel justice system: one for average citizens and another for politically-favored identity groups. Activists have successfully made the case that we must sacrifice equality under the law to address wider social inequalities. They are effectively arguing that our bedrock principle of “equality protection of the laws” is simply a mechanism of state oppression against the homeless, the poor, and people of color – a radical reversal of its original constitutional meaning. -- If activists are successful in this revaluation of the law, there is no obvious limit to the extension of survival-crime theory to other favored identity groups. There is already a growing literature that survival-crime protections should be extended to the LGBTQ community, sex workers, and recipients of public benefits. Under the catch-all doctrine of intersectionality, they can be extended ad infinitum, depending on the political whims of the moment. In a short time, our legal proceedings may no longer begin with the question “what is the crime” but “who is the criminal” – Lady Justice may finally take off her blindfold and play a new role as the arbiter of two separate legal systems, depending on who stands before her.' -- Comment: Brad Thunder Koch 'Welcome to anarcho-tyranny https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Managerial_state#Anarchy_and_tyranny'

'An astonishing report by newspaper Il Giornale [http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/cronache/60-degli-immigrati-italia-ha-pensione-senza-aver-mai-1609565.html] says that 60% of immigrants in Italy have retired having never worked. -- Out of 96,000 non-EU citizens who receive a pension from Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale (INPS), 60,000 have never worked and therefore never paid in any contributions or taxes. -- There are roughly two million foreigners enrolled with Italy’s social security agency in total. The number of employed, contributing towards their pensions is only 1,700,000. -- This means 60 per cent of immigrants in Italy have never worked and are having their pensions paid for by the Italian taxpayer. -- The INPS figures show that in 2017 96,743 pensions were paid to non-EU citizens. Of these, 60,000 receive a pension that is not covered by previously paid contributions. -- The majority of the migrants living off the Italian taxpayer for retirement appears to be older family members allowed to migrate through chain migration “reunited with immigrants” Il Giornale reports. -- The political elite and leftist media have been selling the idea of migration to Europe and the rest of the world as the way to sustain their declining workforces, to fill an increasing void in population to sustain labour and industry. -- Yet the statistics simply do not support this somewhat half-baked theory, with the majority of migrants not working at all and being supported by benefits paid for by the nationals in the workforce.'

'A Somali man whose deportation was thwarted when passengers on the aeroplane taking him out of the country began complaining is a convicted gang rapist linked to an Islamic State fighter. -- 29-year-old Yaqub Ahmed was about to be returned to Somalia via a commercial flight to Istanbul, Turkey, but around a dozen ‘social justice warrior’ passengers on the aeroplane became aware of his situation when he began groaning and wailing. -- They started complaining “They’re separating him from his family” and chanting “take him off the plane” in rowdy scenes recorded by several people on their mobile phones. -- Rather than throw off the disruptive passengers or have them arrested for obstructing the course of justice, however, officials buckled to the mutinous flyers and took Ahmed off the flight, while his supporters applauded and shouted: “You’re free, man!” -- However, the Mail on Sunday has now revealed that the busybodies were championing a convicted gang rapist, and that one of his accomplices travelled to the Islamic State to fight as a jihadist after their crime.' -- https://www.damninteresting.com/this-place-is-not-a-place-of-honor

'In the following article, we will explore this quasi-religion, Wokeness, as a status system that functions predominantly to distinguish white elites from the white masses (whom we will call hoi polloi). It does this by offering a rich signalling vocabulary for traits and possessions such as education, intelligence, openness, leisure, wealth, and cosmopolitanism, all of which educated elites value... From this perspective, the preachers of the Great Awokening – those who most ardently and eloquently articulate the principles of Wokeness – obtain status because they (a) signal the possession of desired traits and (b) promulgate a powerful narrative that legitimizes the status disparity between white elites and hoi polloi. The elites, according to these preachers, are morally righteous and therefore deserve status, whereas hoi polloi are morally backward and deserve obloquy and derision. -- ... Unlike scientific theories or other empirical claims, the basic tenets of Wokeness are held with sacred fervor. Those who challenge them are not debated; rather, their motives are denounced, and they are cast out of polite society like heretics. To take just one example, when someone objects to the Woke principle that “diversity is a strength,” committed believers rarely greet the objection as an opportunity for argument. Instead, they attack the apostate for his sacrilege, and accuse him of unspeakable moral treachery... -- The chief dogmas of Wokeness are that: #All demographic groups are roughly biologically the same (which we have termed cosmic egalitarianism elsewhere). #Bigotry is pervasive. #Almost all disparities among demographic groups are caused by bigotry. #If we all work really hard, we can create a more just, multicultural society. #Diversity is almost always a good thing. -- ... More broadly, Woke dogmas lead to a sacred narrative about the nobility of perceived victims’ groups (e.g., blacks, women, Muslims, gays, transexuals, et cetera). Members of these groups are to be considered the innocent victims of an oppressive and iniquitous patriarchy. Whites, on the other hand, are born burdened with the original sin of privilege, and are therefore presumptively complicit in the system unless they declare fidelity to Wokeness. This creates a Manichean moral doctrine that purports to reverse the current power hierarchy. Victims’ groups are revered, and the powerful are despised. However, as we will argue, this hierarchy is not so simple because it actually elevates a healthy proportion of the powerful, namely the white educated elites who profess unquestioning devotion to Wokeness. So, in the end, it is not really a status reversal so much as a way to distinguish one group of whites from the rest. -- ... Of course, the signaling perspective also explains why so many disciples of Wokeness expend effort writing inscrutable articles about the patriarchy or denouncing sinners on Twitter rather than going out into the world to help the victims’ groups they claim to admire: their primary motivation, whatever their conscious beliefs, is to procure status.'

'STOCKHOLM — Sweden may be known for its popular music, IKEA and a generous welfare state. It is also increasingly associated with a rising number of Islamic State recruits, bombings and hand grenade attacks. -- In a period of two weeks earlier this year, five explosions took place in the country. It’s not unusual these days — Swedes have grown accustomed to headlines of violent crime, witness intimidation and gangland executions. In a country long renowned for its safety, voters cite “law and order” as the most important issue ahead of the general election in September. -- The topic of crime is sensitive, however, and debate about the issue in the consensus-oriented Scandinavian society is restricted by taboos. -- ... Gang-related gun murders, now mainly a phenomenon among men with immigrant backgrounds in the country’s parallel societies, increased from 4 per year in the early 1990s to around 40 last year. Because of this, Sweden has gone from being a low-crime country to having homicide rates significantly above the Western European average. Social unrest, with car torchings, attacks on first responders and even riots, is a recurring phenomenon. -- Shootings in the country have become so common that they don’t make top headlines anymore, unless they are spectacular or lead to fatalities. News of attacks are quickly replaced with headlines about sports events and celebrities, as readers have become desensitized to the violence. A generation ago, bombings against the police and riots were extremely rare events. Today, reading about such incidents is considered part of daily life. -- ... Since crime is intimately linked to the country’s failure to integrate its immigrants, the rise in violence is a sensitive subject. When the Swedish government and opposition refer to the country as a “humanitarian superpower” because it opened its doors to more immigrants per capita during the migrant crisis than any other EU country, they mean it. This has resulted in some impressive contortions. -- In March, Labor Market Minister Ylva Johansson appeared on the BBC, where she claimed that the number of reported rapes and sexual harassment cases “is going down and going down and going down.” In fact, the opposite is true, which Johansson later admitted in an apology.'

'...A Civil Guard traffic control stopped the truck on Tuesday on a road near the Spanish city of Bailén in Jaén. The driver wanted to go to the Strait of Gibraltar, take a ferry and get off in Morocco, where he wanted to protect himself from European justice. -- On Wednesday he was transferred to the Central Examining Court No. 6 of the Audiencia Nacional. His confession made it possible to locate the body of the young woman yesterday, her case had been reported in the German media after her family reported her disappearance 24 hours after her death. -- She had worked with an NGO on the Greek island of Lesbos, where she helped these so-called refugees. Sources consulted by the media emphasized that the body showed “clear symptoms of violence”. The perpetrator had obviously intended to rape her.'

'When you have something valuable enough, people will do almost anything to acquire it. Stefan Molyneux talks about the true genesis of the welfare state, the trade made between women and men and the important gender battle that will shape the future of western civilization.' -- "Women have to give up the welfare state."

'Up to two-thirds of sub-Saharan Africa’s 1.1 billion population want to migrate to Europe or to the United States, with millions planning to make the move in the next five years. -- Around half of people in Kenya, Tanzania, Senegal, and South Africa, and three quarters of those questioned in Ghana and Nigeria, want to immigrate to the U.S. or Europe, according to a study by Pew Research Centre published Thursday. -- Around 40 per cent of those in Senegal, Ghana, and Nigeria who want to leave said they intend to do so in the next five years. -- At least one million sub-Saharan Africans have already migrated to Europe between 2010 and 2017. The majority, 970,000, were asylum seekers; the rest is comprised of Africans who have arrived as students, resettled refugees, and through family reunification. -- In terms of destination, Pew found that just four countries represent nearly three-quarters (72 per cent) of Europe’s current sub-Saharan immigrant population: the UK comes out on top at 1.27 million, followed by France (980,000), Italy (370,000), and Portugal (360,000). -- Researchers found that it is not just poverty or terror (notably committed by Boko Haram [Islamic State] in Nigeria and al-Qaeda in West Africa) that is driving mass migration, but because Africans want to imitate their friends and relatives who have already successfully illegally immigrated to Europe. -- Migrants from Cameroon, Nigeria, Senegal, and Ghana, included pregnant women, the young, and single men, on their way to Europe told German newspaper Die Welt: “We do everything we can to go to paradise.” -- There are an estimated 50,000 migrants in Morocco and between 400,000 and one million in Libya who are preparing to illegally cross the Mediterranean to Spain and Italy, and likely northwards to wealthier nations in the European Union. -- With birth rates of up to seven children per woman, by 2050 Africa’s population is expected to double. -- “The demographic development is a ticking time bomb,” the EU’s ambassador to Niger, Raul Mateus Paula, told Die Welt. “If this development is not stopped, it could lead to a disaster,” he said, noting that all attempts to deter African migration have not caught on. -- The EU is already plugging funds into the continent to prevent what the German newspaper referred to as the ‘second phase of migration’, with 600 million euros being made available to Niger alone by 2020. -- Ambassador Paula called the preventative measures “a drop in the ocean”, saying that every impoverished country in Africa would need financial support and, besides the political instability and institutionalised corruption of many of these nations, it would take years for the measures to stem the tide of mass migration out of the continent.'

'London Mayor Sadiq Khan has unveiled a £1.4m fund to tackle knife crime, boasting of a £6,400 award to a London Islamic Centre while maintaining that his budget doesn’t allow him to hire more police. -- The announcement this week revealed the Mayor plans to give the tax payer funded Croydon Black and Minority Ethnic Forum £49,736 to “deliver training and support to five grassroots organisations who provide activities for people affected by knife crime in Croydon”. The programme is said to reach “at least 60 people”. -- ...The Mayor has continuously blamed central government “police cuts” for the problems faced, but statistics reveal London only lost around 1,000 police officers (3 per cent) in the past year, reducing the workforce from 31,343 to 30,379. He announced a £6 million flush fund for exclusive toilets for London bus drivers, and a £34 million budget for green projects. -- London also boasts over 900 police officers “dedicated to investigating hate crime” — one of Khan’s top priorities as mayor. -- The London mayor recently travelled to the liberal SXSW in Texas in the United States to bemoan mean tweets being sent at him, while threatening action against social media firms who don’t crack down on what he calls “hate crimes”.'

'...“Crime is increasing and increasing, and they aren’t doing anything about it,” Mr. Garrido said. “It’s denial. Swedes are very good people and they want to change the world. They want the rest of the world to be like Sweden. And the reality is that it’s completely different.”'

'What a scandal for our times. Oxfam, that upholder of modern-day virtue, unassailable in its righteousness, buried for seven years that its aid workers exploited young girls. The men abused their power to have sex with desperate victims of the Haiti earthquake — the very people they were supposed to protect. -- ... This is the same Oxfam that recently blamed capitalism for world poverty and set up deck chairs in Trafalgar square to protest against corruption and tax havens. Now the virtue signallers are hoisted on the shard of their own fallibility. Compared with the emerging sins of our aid agencies, tax havens look almost benign. -- Sadly Oxfam is not alone. Andrew Macleod, former chief operator of the UN Emerging Coordination Centre, contends paedophiles and ‘-predatory’ sex abusers use the halo of charity work to get close to desperate women and children. ‘You have the impunity to do whatever you want. It is endemic across the aid industry and across the world.’ He warns the infiltration of the aid industry by paedophiles is on the scale of the Catholic church — if not bigger. The difficult truth is that ‘child rape crimes are being inadvertently funded in part by the United Kingdom taxpayer’. -- These revelations threaten to extinguish the virtuous glow that has protected the aid industry from scrutiny. We should seize the opportunity. Is the £13.5 billion we spend on aid each year doing its job? What is its impact on the countries it is supposed to transform at the local and on the national level? -- Until now the aid industry has escaped such examination. It is astonishing to learn that aid effectiveness was not even seen as a priority until 2005. Evaluations still use dubious methods, Jonathan Foreman points out in his excellent report ‘Aiding and Abetting’ (Civitas 2013). One man recalls being told about a splendid school in a village in Pakistan. He had visited the village the week before. There had been no school. -- The aid industry has manipulated public opinion with the help of celebrities and politicians eager for the glitz of poverty porn. It’s a powerful and cosy lobby. -- ... Dambisa Moyo, a global economist from Zambia, points out the first world has sent more than $1 trillion to Africa over the past 50 years. Far from ending extreme poverty, this fabulous sum promoted it. Between 1970 and 1998, when aid flows to Africa were at their peak, poverty in Africa rose from 11 per cent to a staggering 66 per cent. Of course there are other factors. But in her book Dead Aid, Moyo states, ‘Aid has been and continues to be an unmitigated political, economic and humanitarian disaster for most parts of the developing world.’ -- Indeed the more development aid a country receives, the less likely it is to enjoy economic success. In 1957, Ghana boasted a higher per capita GDP than South Korea. Thirty years later, it was lower by a factor of ten — the toxic effect of official development aid being one factor. On the other hand, South Korea, Singapore and Malaysia, the recipients of relatively little aid, flourished. Aid distorts home markets. Food aid, for example, causes agricultural sectors to shrink and makes famine more rather than less likely. As Moyo puts it, in no other sector, business or politics, are such proven failures ‘allowed to persist in the face of such stark and unassailable evidence’. -- Aid does little to promote peace, security, trade and good governance. If anything, it hinders effective government. The cascade of aid money permits government to abdicate its responsibility to fund health care, education and infrastructure. It promotes a disconnect between a government and its citizens. When foreign donors cover 40 per cent of the operating budgets of countries such as Kenya and Uganda, why would leaders listen to their citizens? Schmoozing foreign donors comes first. As Moyo says, ‘Long, long lines of people have stood in the sun to vote for a president who is effectively impotent because of foreign donors or because glamour aid [in the form of Bob Geldof or Bono] has decided to speak on behalf of a continent.’'

'...Official new guidance on “equal treatment” instructs judges to favour non-white defendants in order to “redress inequality”, despite recent research having found young white men to be the most derided group in Britain. -- Produced by the Judicial College, the organisation responsible for training judges in Britain, the Equal Treatment Guide’s latest edition says: “True equal treatment may not … always mean treating everyone in the same way.”' -- All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than other animals.

'The following is a documentation of an interview with the German artist, activist for the rights of indigenous peoples, and UN advisor Rebecca Sommer, by the Polish website EuroIslam from January 18, 2018. Rebecca used to support Muslim “refugees” in Germany, and describes how her experience made her gradually change her mind over core issues. It is a long text but well worth the read. Please note that there is currently a mistranslation circulating, claiming that she said to she was moving to Poland. This is inaccurate; she said she knows Germans who are moving to Poland. -- ... #You used the word taqqiya. How do you understand it and how did you come across it?: Most Europeans don’t know the word taqqiya*, and people who try to warn against this form of religiously justified behavior are immediately branded as racists, even if they come from the same regions and cultural circles as the immigrants, whom we call refugees. Taqqiya means “cheating”. Taqqiya [originally was supposed to protect Muslims against persecution – editor Euroislam], gives Muslims permission to be insincere to us, the non-Muslims, if this would protect Islam and Muslims. There are various forms of lies that are allowed under certain circumstances in relations with non-Muslims, and taqqiya is the best known one. This is about circumstances such as supporting Islamic interests or individual Muslim nations [Muslim community – ed.] – for example, when they can gain the trust of an unbeliever through lies – which makes him weak – to defeat him in this way. -- The undermining of trust is programmed here. Muslims can deceive and lie to an infidel, it is not ethically blameworthy if this tactic will bring some profit that will help him and the Ummah. He doesn’t have to be ashamed of it. In order to extract benefits from the unbeliever, they can pretend friendship or love as long as they don’t feel it in their hearts. Thanks to the existence of taqqiya Muslims are free from any responsibility towards the unbeliever – this is my warning for women who deal with them! But also especially for our politicians who enter into agreements with Islamic unions – no oath, even in the name of Allah, matters because of taqqiya, because Allah has dispensed his faithful from oaths towards unbelievers. The only condition: the lying one must deeply believe in the Koran and Allah. Taqqiya allows a Muslim to act as if he were not a Muslim. He can say and do everything as long as it is used to, for example, gain the trust of a person. Or of a country. Now think about what religious ideology we are dealing with! -- ... #I have heard that the situation in German schools is quite dramatic. What can you say about it?: As shown in the latest survey, which subjects to fourth grade students in cities, over 50% have a migration background, and the level of teaching has decreased so dramatically that – according to research – it is at the level of a developing country. However, our biggest problem is with children from Muslim families, who form the largest group among children with a migration background. As I have already noted, this is a culture of a violence, and their potential for aggression is a big problem. Unlike in German families, those children are often brought up with corporal punishment; and beatings by father or elder brother, as I see and hear, they belong to everyday life. This makes these children very aggressive – they solve problems by force. And they show typical herd behaviors. Children brought up differently, who are from cultures in which they are discussing, in which children learn freedom of belief and tolerance – such children are immediately in a lost position. They try to have a conversation, which in the eyes of Muslim children makes them weak and turns them into potential victims. -- In addition, these children act as a group – if you have a conflict with one, you are facing a group of dozens of children, because they also understand the world as “Muslims against others.” Body injuries are common occurence, and teachers’ hands are tied, because the law gives them little resources to react adequately. Special schools for socially unfit children are already full and lack teachers and resources that would allow them to react and counteract.'

'A refugee worker who once welcomed Angela Merkel’s decision to open Germany’s borders to over a million predominantly Muslim migrants now admits she was wrong and is emigrating to Poland, asserting, “It’s too late for Germany.” -- After founding the refugee aid association Working Group Asylum + Human Rights in 2012, Rebecca Sommer was delighted to welcome the deluge of migrants that began arriving in Germany in the second half of 2015. -- “At that time I wanted to help everyone and truly believed that all these people were fleeing hell and were in a state of complete distress,” Sommer told Polish weekly Do Rzeczy [https://dorzeczy.pl/kraj/52961/Niemcy-uciekna-do-was.html]. -- Along with over 300 volunteers, Sommer began providing German language courses to the new arrivals with the aim of helping them integrate into society. -- With the initial hope that “their medieval view was going to change with time,” Sommer soon realized that, “Muslim refugees have grown up with values that are totally different, they have undergone brainwashing from childhood on and are indoctrinated by Islam and absolutely do not intend to adopt our values.” -- She also observed how the migrants, “regard we infidels with disdain and arrogance,” after they began to refer to her as “the stupid German whore,” a realization that she says has led other refugee volunteers to quit. -- Sommer now admits that despite her good intentions, she got it completely wrong and that Muslim migration poses an existential threat to the Germany way of life, a problem that will only be exacerbated by the process of family reunification, where migrants will be able to invite their relatives to stay in Germany. -- “If Poland and Hungary do not give in on this question, you could become countries that some Germans and French will flee to. You could become islands of stability in Europe,” said Sommer, adding that she has been personally attacked five separate times by Arabic-speaking men.'

'We’ve had enough. The tide is turning.' -- "Freedom and prosperity are yours for the taking, but you're too stupid and uncivilised to understand or appreciate it. Instead, you aspire to dominate the ruins of a society that you'd like to destroy. You won't be happy until we're all living in the same kind of repressive, backward Third World sinkhole that you couldn't wait to get out of. How stupid are you? [https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country] Of all your deeply unpleasant qualities your arrogance is the most embarrassing to behold. You are the people with the very least to be arrogant about. You have absolutely nothing to be proud of. Your disgusting, misogynistic culture is an insult to civilised people and a stain on humanity, and so are you. Your instincts are crude, ugly and destructive. You contribute nothing because you have nothing to contribute. All you ever have to offer is moronic violence and phony grievance. You are the eternal aggressor who yet somehow manages to be the eternal victim... Your greatest error is in mistaking European generosity for weakness because that's the impressive you've been given by bedwetters, shysters and crooks who run things here. But they won't be running things for much longer..."

'...Given the criminality of r-strategists looking for easy, free resources regardless of rule breaking, if Eastern Europe pushes all of them off on Germany, that will impact Germany’s tolerant, patient r-strategy the same way post-WWI exploitation of Germany by the rest of Europe eventually impacted Germany’s tolerance for the rabbits who took advantage of them. -- I suspect the 10 million number is low as well, and by a lot. When the economic apocalypse hits, all foreign aid to Africa will go away suddenly. That will mean huge famines and massive resource constriction in Africa. Africa has expanded way beyond its natural carrying capacity on the back of Western generosity. Take away that generosity, and Africa will be way beyond its carrying capacity. -- That will probably produce disease outbreaks, chaos, violence, and anarchy on top of the famine. If you thought Syria was bad, you haven’t seen anything compared to what Africa will be like at the Apocalypse. -- For most Africans, it will literally be head to Europe or die, and our leftist migrant fetishists have already set the stage to make everyone think Europe is migrant heaven.'

'"...It is known that the deceased spent some time in a loving relationship with the murderer, but then she wanted to stop sleeping with him. After that, the Afghan began to threaten her and pursue the girl, her parents had to file a complaint against an insistent Afghan. The police held a conversation with him, but Abdul decided to wait for the girl and kill her." -- Only a human rabbit could see some savage like that sleeping with his 15 year old daughter, and have no problem with it. -- Then there is the inconvenient little fact of how if you import the third world, you will live in the third world. -- ...the psychopath says, “I don’t know what you call this emotion, but it’s what people look like just before you stab them.” -- Now look at us with the Migrant Fetishists, the left in America, and the Cuckservatives. We see problems. We see stupidity. We know this will all be a problem. But the Migrant Fetishists, lacking amygdala, cannot fathom what we see and feel. Migrant Fetishists would say of us, “I don’t know what they are feeling, but that is how they get when we are importing migrant rapists.” Just like the psychopath stabbing someone, they have no idea why what they are doing would be wrong, or why we might be upset about it. -- Even as their daughters are raped and stabbed, and their cars are set alight, and people can’t go in migrant neighborhoods because everyone is throwing acid in people’s faces and robbing them, the left cannot fathom that importing third world scum is a bad idea. They are the mental defectives, who actually lack the circuitry to foresee the problems they are creating, and the relation of present problems to decisions they made. -- Even worse, like the psychopath, I suspect they like the euphoria they feel from watching the misery they are inflicting on their fellow humans. -- ... Still, the most amazing aspect is how everyone who is so afflicted, is not only clueless about their own deficiencies, but how they have come to believe fervently that it is the normal people who are the defectives who need to be destroyed. -- We live in a world with the politics of psychopathy.'

'A prominent figure in the Alternative for Germany party (AfD) has run afoul of Germany’s draconian new censorship law, as officials crack down on whatever they deem to be “hate speech.” -- Twitter froze the account of Beatrix von Storch, saying she had violated “hate speech” rules, after the politician tweeted her indignation at a New Year’s greeting issued in Arabic by the Cologne Police. -- “What the hell is happening in this country? Why is an official police site tweeting in Arabic? Do you think it is to appease the barbaric, gang-raping hordes of Muslim men?” wrote von Storch, the deputy leader of the AfD party. -- As Breitbart News reported at the time, Cologne was the epicenter of mass sexual assaults, gang rapes and looting by mostly Muslim migrants during the 2015-2016 New Year’s Eve celebrations, although smaller, similar incidents also occurred in Hamburg, Dortmund, Düsseldorf, Stuttgart and Bielefeld. Police acknowledged in a leaked document that some 1,200 women were sexually assaulted throughout Germany in the course of the New Year celebrations. -- ... “This is the end of the rule of law,” she wrote, posting the message she received from Facebook administrators. -- In her censored Facebook message, Ms. von Storch said that Germany is “a free country where we can call barbarians by their name. Even if they are Muslims. (I refer to those against whom we are now setting up tents for German women, because the state can no longer guarantee them security outside the tents).” -- The parliamentarian was referring to a new measure taken to protect German women from assault during the New Year’s celebrations. This year a special “safe zone” for women was created at the annual New Year’s Eve party in front of Berlin’s iconic Brandenburg Gate at the request of the Berlin police. -- ... The AfD party and many others have criticized NetzDG for its open censorship of free speech. What one person deems offensive is not offensive to others, they maintain, and the law itself is not endowed with the power to protect people from everything that offends their sensibilities.'

'Get off your Twitter high-horse: your cowardice created this. -- ...Trump has now only gone and retweeted Britain First, the odious right-wing group that thinks Muslims are the source of Europe’s every social and moral ill. Trump shared a tweet by Jayda Fransen, the brash, weird woman who fronts Britain First, containing a video titled, ‘Islamist mob pushes teenage boy off roof and beats him to death!’. It’s too perfect. It’s the smoking gun the ‘Trump is Hitler’ lobby has been waiting for. Here’s the actual president sharing actual hard-right propaganda about how awful Muslims are. Twitter is going to implode; they cannot believe their luck. -- ... But the Brits, and others, currently raging against the president, the virtual leftists fulminating about ‘fascism in the White House’ and ‘Islamophobia’ now getting the blessing of the actual president of the US, the British MPs insisting parliament denounce Trump, the Muslim community groups saying this proves anti-Islam hate is goose-stepping through the virtual and political worlds etc, etc – you can all do one, too. -- For you made this monster. Britain First is a mess of your unwitting creation. You, and your censorship, and your cowardice, and your pathologisation of concern about Islam, and your treatment of any questioning of mass immigration as tantamount to a hate crime, created the space for these new, ‘edgy’ right-wing movements to take root and expand. In making certain things unsayable, you paved the way for these largely virtual loudmouth outfits to say: ‘We will say the unsayable.’ Britain First is a cast-iron example of how the chilling of public debate never, ever fixes problems or disappears people’s concerns or prejudices; it merely warps them, and often worsens them, and forces them to take root elsewhere. -- What did these guardians of acceptable thought think would happen when they ringfenced Islam from ridicule, with the weapons of both law and social opprobrium, and made it pretty much the only ideology that we cannot freely, openly criticise? If you make concern about Islam into a mental sickness (Islamophobia), and nod as Twitter is policed for signs of anti-Islam sentiment, as speakers are banned from campuses because they don’t like Islam, and as concern even about Islamist violence is treated as evidence of a prejudiced, racial mental malaise, then you send a very clear message to sections of the public: ‘You cannot express your views in public. Not unless you want to be called racist and scum. Not unless you want to lose your job. Not unless you want to be named and shamed by us. So go somewhere else.’ And people do. Many go to fairly mainstream right-wing groups that are willing to discuss issues about religion, immigration and values. Others vote for new, sometimes unattractive parties, like Germany’s Alternative fur Deutschland. And some, not many, get drawn into groups like Britain First who make a big, showy, bloated deal of just how willing they are to say what we’re now not meant to say. -- Here’s the thing. So shrunken has the space for honest, all-views-welcome moral and political discussion become in recent years that now even to speak of ‘British values’ is to risk being branded a racist. And they’re surprised that in a climate like that a group called Britain First is making waves?' -- 'If there is hope,' wrote Winston, 'it lies in the proles.' ~ Nineteen Eighty-Four

'The third world will be the end of us, or at least the r-strategists: "HOSPITAL patients in Madagascar suffering from the plague are running away from hospitals because they are scared of needles and aren’t used to hospital treatment. -- Security guards at the Central Anti-Plague Hospital in Ambohimindra, are tasked with keeping patients in as well as making sure those arriving follow safety procedures." -- What that means is these people are getting an initial burst of antibiotics, and then bailing from the hospital and going into hiding, where what microbes survive the initial burst of antibiotics will multiply back up and become the dominant strain in the host. -- And even if they defeat this outbreak, in a few months these people will dig up the bodies of the victims to dance with them in the streets, and they will bring it right back. -- When this hits Africa, and is antibiotic resistant, it will be a matter of time before those who get hit hop the first plane to the US to get primo medical care at the CDC, and maybe a chance to survive. And then you will have an entire 747 full of exposed infectees deplaning in Atlanta with them and then scattering across America on connecting flights. -- All of r produces K – every last bit. From the destructive economic effects destroying resource availability, to the out-group tolerance producing the diversity that breeds conflict, to the embrace of imbeciles who will bring on the pandemic. -- Leftism will bring the Apocalypse no matter what anybody does, and they will do it with all of their attempts to create an Apocalypse-proof utopia. It is really ironic.'

'...It seems government officials in the UK are far more troubled by losing a “generation” to ISIS than having that generation’s return to their nation’s shores. Those jihadis just need to be reintegrated and everything will be a-okay. -- The authorities’ ideas for reintegrating these foreign jihadis include giving them free housing and other taxpayer-funded support. What a way to punish terrorism. -- This proposal of letting in hundreds of hardened Islamic militants in the country without any consequences for the returnees has sparked vigorous debate in Britain. -- Unfortunately, plenty of British commentators think the proposal is a brilliant idea. -- Self-proclaimed feminist journalist Sirena Bergman recently argued on a television panel that most of these jihadis were simply too naive to understand ISIS barbarism. -- “We want those people [British ISIS fighters] to come back. We want to encourage them to reintegrate into society,” Bergman said, before ranting about “divisive rhetoric” that calls for killing the militants. -- The journalist also takes the peculiar stance that the only reason the UK wants to kill, or at least disenfranchise ISIS militants is because most Britons “don’t agree” with their ideology. -- Writing for The Guardian in September, United Nations consultant Sanam Naraghi-Anderlini argued the best weapon to de-radicalize returning jihadis was with “our humanity.” -- Naraghi-Anderlini asserts that many of these hardcore militants are victims as well, and urges a humane approach that seeks to rehabilitate them into their old communities. -- “As we face the prospect of Isis returnees to the UK, we must challenge our own perceptions. It would be easy if they were all one-dimensional, Bond-movie bad guys – but they are not. If we fall victim to this sort of thinking, we become that which we abhor and fear,” the UN consultant writes. “Instead our collective task as a nation is to find our own deep well of decency and humanity, to be fair and compassionate, just and kind, and perhaps above all to care.” -- The message here is that Britons can win over ISIS returnees with their superior values of tolerance and compassion, values that apparently didn’t win over these militants when they previously dwelled in the UK.'

'A response video to a critique video regarding Capitalism, and how the ease and wealth created by Capitalism can lead to numerous negative outcomes for a society, not the least of which is gynocentrism.'

'...In short, Givedirectly.org sends your money via mobile phone to really poor people. That’s it. No Land Cruisers, no degrees in development studies, no distorting the local economy by causing ambitious Kenyans to study sociology for three years in the hope of landing a job with an aid agency. Having identified someone who is inarguably very poor, it sends them large payments every month for a year — totalling $1,000, effectively doubling their income. The money is sent directly using the mobile phone payment systems, which are, fascinatingly, far more advanced in Kenya or Uganda than here. -- At this point, you’re probably thinking, ‘But can it really be that simple?’ Well, here’s the odd thing: it seems that direct cash transfer really works. There is very little opportunity to game the system — because there is not much system to game. Moreover, all the research shows that for years after people receive this year-long influx of funds, they earn more, own more, work more and are substantially happier. -- Two things seem to be significant about this. One is that the money is given unconditionally — trusting that individuals rather than outside experts know what’s needed to improve their lives. The second is that the money is paid in large lump sums, but for a limited time. Conventional wisdom suggest that poor people given lump sums simply spend it all in some massive binge. All the evidence so far suggests the opposite is true. Most of us, after all, are both stingier and more far-sighted with windfalls than with our day-to-day salaries. Why should Ugandans be any different? -- If it really is so simple, why did we not discover it before? One scary possibility presents itself. Quite simply, because many people like performing jobs that are visibly charitable and altruistic, might they overcomplicate solutions through the unconscious urge to play a heroic role in achieving them?' -- For every Rescuer, a Victim.

'...Notice gun control will only affect the law-abiding. The criminal savages will actually benefit from it, and seek guns out more actively. If everyone has a gun, criminal rabbits will not want one because they won’t want a gunfight where they might get shot. -- But disarm everyone, and suddenly there is a ready-made pathway to free resources. Just get a gun, and everyone else has to give you free resources, and there is no risk to you. That will actually drive criminal rabbits to seek out illegal guns. -- As the Muslims open up supply lines back the middle east, and begin filling Mosques with armories even Russian Spetznaz would envy, it will pose a serious risk to Western European dominance in Europe. It is not impossible we might lose a nation here or there, as heavily armed rabbits just threaten the disarmed populations into submission.'

'...If there is a major economic collapse, and there certainly will be, that is what the cities will look like. They are set up for it from the dependency on government for food, power, heat, cooling, water, and even garbage disposal and self defense. Even worse, the populations are just too dense to supply themselves with food in a self-sustaining manner, and what is brought in will have to navigate set, predictable pathways. -- These Caribbean Islands are surrounded by bathwater-temperature, crystal clear water filled with fish, and rock lobsters, and conchs, and crabs, all sorts of other potential food. New York City is all concrete and steel, with maybe three days worth of rats to eat, if you can catch them. From there, it will be chaos, with no food or supplies, no utilities, and floods of rabbit refugees desperate to get out. -- Now contrast that with the south, where the Cajun Navy joins with regular Texans to save the day on a moment’s notice, and people police their own neighborhoods with guns effortlessly to stop all looting. -- What do rabbits do? They migrate. My guess is a feature of the collapse will be a flood of rabbit refugees from the cities, flooding into the rural areas. They will look so helpless, and they will be so conciliatory and feign such gratefulness you won’t initially be able to kill them. -- But let them stay, and they will gravitate to government and the bureaucracy, they will team with local rabbits to import criminal savages for compassion’s sake, and before long the new rabbit army will try to legally tie down their new hosts and recreate the same socialist shitholes they just fled from, using the money, safety, and success of their hosts to do it. -- If the rural are wise, they will kill off the rabbits and drive them back where they came from at first sight.'

'German churches are sheltering hundreds of migrants — including many supposed converts — whose asylum claims have been rejected as illegitimate by the authorities. -- ... Germany is authorised to deport such people, but do not interfere with migrants living on church grounds — although they are legally entitled to do so. -- “The churches said: ‘Sometimes from a humanitarian or a Christian point of view, the law is not correct’,” said Martina Domke, head of migration at the Cologne office of Diakonie, the German Protestant church’s social-welfare organisation. -- One Lutheran church the Post visited had 12 migrants in the basement; one of them had been there for around six months. -- Many of these migrants “convert” to Christianity en masse — a phenomenon which has also been observed in Austria and even Lebanon. -- “This church went from just a few hundred members to more than 1,300 Iranians and Afghans,” boasted one German pastor. “All converts.” -- Conversion boosts the migrants’ chances of being able to remain in Europe even after their initial claims are rejected, since apostates — believers who leave their faith — are put to death in countries where Islamic law holds sway. -- Whilst the churchmen interviewed by The Washington Post protested the authenticity of their new recruits, law enforcement has complained conversion is often simply a tactic to avoid deportation. -- “If the deportation of the offender has failed because he has changed his faith, then one has to put two and two together,” argued Ulf Küche, a senior police officer and vice-chairman of the Federal German Criminal Police Office. -- It is possible for Muslims to outwardly deny Islam whilst privately continuing to hold true to it under the doctrine of taqiyya — a form of religiously sanctioned deception or dissimulation which EU counter-terror chief Gilles de Kerchove recently warned was being used by extremists “to disguise their convictions”.'

'Healthcare professionals working in Swedish hospitals are living in fear as a result of threats and violence from criminal patients and their extended families. -- Local media reports that staff caring for gunshot victims, many of whom are criminals and people injured in gang related violence, are threatened with death and rape as patients’ “clans” storm the hospital. -- “It has become almost a given in some situations that we will see victims’ relatives charging into the hospital wards and issuing verbal threats to healthcare workers,” said an emergency room nurse working at Vrinnevis Hospital in Norrköping, who wished to remain anonymous. -- As a result of the threats and violence being spread in Swedish hospitals by gangsters, criminals, and clans, healthcare workers often hide their name badges to conceal their identities, fearing assaults outside of working hours, and even attacks on their families on children. -- An SVT piece published earlier this week featuring testimony from hospital staff who deal with gunshot victims, said employees are “afraid to be shot at work”, with patients’ family members arriving “wearing bulletproof vests … and it is unclear whether they are armed”. -- “As well as getting death threats from patients and their enemies, staff also have to deal with the relatives and friends of gunshot victims threatening workers with knives, and even threatening to hunt down our children and family members,” one healthcare worker said.' ...

'...The truth is, when they say it, they did live in places where everyone did it all the time. -- Obviously these are sub-par candidates as neighbors or citizens. But imagine if you were an elite. These imbeciles will do anything, for any retarded reason. Just tell them the spirits will bring them wealth in the future, and they will kill and eat whoever you want. -- This is the army the elites hope will supplant the average conservative in the nation: ... -- Oddly enough, that leg looks like it has a little saran wrap on it near the ankle. I think that might actually be leftover leg that he just pulled out of the fridge. He isn’t even eating fresh cooked leg. He’s eating leftovers he pulled from his fridge. Imagine opening his fridge to grab a Perrier, and having all those body parts wrapped up in saran wrap staring at you. As if the world needed to get more surreal. -- If the Bush family could just have imported more of these characters, Jeb Bush could have been President now instead of Donald Trump, and the replacement of our kind could be continuing as we speak. -- Think about it. That is the only reason that would explain the cucks’ perpetual desire to import more and more third-worlders.'

'...Recent migrants to Sweden are largely unemployed and constitute a large section of the total number of people out of work. By 2018 Swedish authorities believe that 60 percent of all the migrants in Sweden will be unemployed. The report, by the Swedish Public Employment Service, also noted that the migrant unemployment rate was three times that of native Swedes. -- In June of 2016, Sweden’s state-owned broadcaster SVT revealed that only 494 migrants of the 163,000 who had recently arrived had found meaningful work. -- The problem of integrating migrants into the labour force is also a big problem in Germany where few migrants manage to join the workforce. Some economists have said that mass migration will ultimately harm long-term economic growth rather than help it grow. -- Some migrants in Germany have managed to find work, but integration has also presented other problems. Recently a Syrian migrant who found work as a hairdresser and was hailed as a “model of integration,” was arrested after trying to stab his 64-year-old female boss to death over an alleged work dispute.'

'Rape is not rape, if you are a foreigner: "A German judge has acquitted a Turkish man of rape, despite the fact that he forced a woman to have sex with him, and left her incapacitated. The judge argued that in “the mentality of the Turkish cultural circle,” what the woman “had experienced as rape” might be considered merely “wild sex.” The judge refused to convict the rapist, because “no intention is demonstrable.”" -- Again, this is about appeasing the out-group to facilitate the survival of a high-long-form-DRD4-carrying migrant. If the leftist landed among foreigners, suddenly deciding that all those rapists in the new society were perfectly decent guys, who were just misunderstood because we migrants didn’t grasp their culture, is the best way to avoid conflict and survive. -- Notice how even though they haven’t migrated, the leftist is still acting as if we have to respect foreign cultures, even when they rape and murder. We K-strategists can’t grasp this, because our attitude is foreigners should accommodate our cultural norms if they move here. We are made to have the migrants appease us. -- But as free resources expand, the leftist instincts increase in prevalence and are mistaken for a logical consensus of the population. Even though it is completely illogical, the leftist can’t tell the difference. Suddenly rape is excusable.'

'Muslim rules to be enforced more and more in Swedish society: "Sweden’s biggest music festival will be replaced next year by a women-only alternative after reports of a series of rapes and sexual assaults at this year’s event." -- Its ironic. All of these womyn have just enacted the same rules they would bemoan in Saudi Arabia, bringing their national culture one step closer to a Sharia-based culture. Now all the Muslims have to do is rape them more widely, and soon no woman will be able to go out alone or fraternize with men anywhere. -- Of course there is no word on whether men who identify as women can attend the concert. If they can, then expect a load of Muslim men in burkas lining up to get in. And if they can’t watch the Muslim men line up outside, along paths the women will travel on their way to and from the concert. -- There is only one way to take Sweden back to the time when women did not have to fear being raped. They all have to go back.'

Islamic fundamentalist: "For Allah, because he wills it in the Koran."

LE: "I don't understand"

IF: "We despise your Western permissive liberal civilisation, your attitude towards freedom and everything about your culture. We consider you filthy and your influence on the world to be wicked. We want to destroy you."

LE: "I still don't understand"

IF: "You are polytheists and atheists who refuse to submit to Islam. You are degenerates. We are going to destroy your society"

LE: "I still don't understand, why are you doing this?"

IF: "You permit alcohol, you permit sex outside marriage, you tolerate homosexuality, you grant women equality to men, you permit freedom of speech. This is forbidden in the Koran and we are going to destroy you for it."

IF: "No, it's nothing to do with your foreign policy. We are doing this everywhere and for the same reasons. If it was to do with your foreign policy, we would be attacking your political institutions, but we attack places where your filthy behaviour is on show: pop concerts, nightclubs, gay bars and so on."

LE: "Come on, it's our foreign policy isn't it!"

IF: "No, I've told you repeatedly why we are doing this. Every time we attack you, we tell you why. The fact that we're even having this conversation demonstrates we've already won. You are so confused and demoralised that you won't see the facts in front of your face even when we tell you why we are attacking you. You refuse to face your existential threats. We despise your immoral, un-Islamic society. We despise your weakness and your lack of shared values. The easiest thing to do would be to lock us all up and deport us, but you're so demoralised you won't do that"

LE: "We couldn't lock you all up or kick you all out, that would be a violation of your human rights!"

IF: "Exactly. You are so brainwashed that faced with an existential threat, you're more concerned with the human rights of the existential threat than with confronting it. We've already won. The truth is you don't really have anything left to defend. You're a load of people on the way out. You don't have any kids. You don't have any shared values. When we blow you up, you sing inane pop songs."

LE: "We have values! We believe in choice, tolerance, diversity and multiculturalism!"

IF: "We know! Those aren't beliefs, they are platitudes. Those are words that people who don't believe in anything use. If you actually believed in something, you wouldn't use them. We know that. We know that you don't believe in anything. We believe in something. We believe in Allah, you believe in nothing. We are united in our belief, you are disunited by your disbelief. That makes us strong and you weak."

LE: "But diversity!"

IF: "We know! It's hilarious! We can, quite literally, walk through your towns and streets dressed in full Islamist uniform, waving an enemy flag and chanting death to the West and you barely bat an eyelid. It's ridiculous."

LE: "But tolerance!!"

IF: "We know! Every time a grassroots movement opposing us crops up, an even larger number of you turn up to oppose THEM! We can hardly believe it!!"

LE: "But equality!!"

IF: "We know! There was a time you actually believed something, and you believed that it was the best. Now, you put the metaphysical belief system - Christianity - on which your forebears built your society on a par with everything and nothing. Heck, what little established religion you have left has acquiesced to the failed secular ideologies that have destroyed and confused you. And if anyone asserts the orthodox Christianity that might give you a fighting chance, you ridicule and crush them. It's hilarious!"

LE: "But multiculturalism!"

IF: "Yes! It's incredible! People come to live in your countries, refuse to assimilate - or find nothing fit to assimilate with - and you think it's something to shout about! Who in their right mind would think that!? You're insane. Literally insane. You say that we're insane but we're the ones trying to impose our beliefs, not have beliefs imposed on us."

LE: "You won't change our way of life!"

IF: "We know! It's great! If you were sane and concerned with your existence, you'd all be on the streets routing us, or at least you'd be creating and voting for political parties to do that. But you won't. You'll bury your heads in the sand like you always do. You're now basically indifferent to the survival of your society. Your birth rates have been telling us that for years anyway. We despise you all the more for your inaction, your sterility and your timidity. We're going to carry on bombing you and doubling our numbers every twelve years, and you're going to carry on aborting and thwarting your children and singing Robbie Williams songs. Until you're all dead, or converts to Islam."

LE: "Right. That's it. I've had enough. ♫ All we are sa-ying! Is give peace a chaa-nce ♫. Down with Islamophobia!"

IF: "And you know the best thing? We aren't really an existential threat to you at all. You are. We'll never kill as many of you in suicide bombings as you do in abortion clinics. We haven't forced you to embrace all the values that are eating you from within. Don't forget, we walk your streets, we listen to and watch your media and your culture. We know what you talk about, what you don't talk about. We see your "gay pride" parades, where you celebrate your own social and personal destruction. We know you. We know you can't face reality of your own situation. You talk about the weather, or the NHS, or climate change. But never about whether your children will inherit your society. We see the civilisational exhaustion on your faces, in the clothes you wear, in the way you live. We know you have destroyed any shared metaphysical understanding of the purpose of existence. We know that we're just kicking at a rotten structure, and that it will collapse eventually anyway. We know. We know more about you than most of you do."

'...Observers have surmised that the real reason for the judge’s leniency was that he feared his family might be subjected to retribution from the clan. -- Middle Eastern crime syndicates have established themselves across Germany, where they engage in racketeering, extortion, money laundering, pimping and trafficking in humans, weapons and drugs. -- The syndicates, which are run by large clans with origins in Lebanon, Turkey, Syria, among other places, operate with virtual impunity because German judges and prosecutors are unable or unwilling to stop them. -- The clans — some of which migrated to Germany during Lebanon’s 1975-1990 civil war and have grown to thousands of members — now control large swathes of German cities and towns — areas that are effectively lawless and which German police increasingly fear to approach. -- Ralph Ghadban, a Lebanese-German political scientist and a leading expert on Middle Eastern clans in Germany, said that the Hanover ruling was a massive failure of the German judicial system. He added that the only way for Germany to achieve control over the clans is to destroy them: ... -- ...Muslim immigrants will never view secular Western governments as their own has caused these crime families to become mini governments separate and distinct from the official German one. -- Also at this point the battle is halfway lost already, because for the German state to re-take legitimacy, they would need to demonstrate their power over the gangs. However, in order to do that they would almost invariably have to engage in ‘Goliath’-style actions that will make the gangs look like the victim, at least to members their own community. -- Unfortunately the German government is actually GIVING the gangs additional power though, as we can see from the following facts: "The clans have also entered the refugee business by buying real estate and renting those properties to asylum seekers at exorbitant prices. Focus magazine reported that they are laundering dirty money while at the same time getting paid by the German state to house migrants. -- Focus reporters visited a dilapidated apartment in Berlin in which five Syrian refugees were accommodated in 20 square meters (215 square feet). On the regular rental market the apartment would barely have yielded €300 ($335) a month in rent, but the clan collects around €3,700 ($4,125) per month from the German state, which pays landlords to house migrants. “Business with the refugees is now more profitable than drug trafficking,” said Heinz Buschkowsky, a former mayor of Neukölln. -- The Berlin Criminal Police Office (Landeskriminalamt) confirmed that “proceeds from criminal offenses, including organized crime, were invested in real estate by the persons concerned or by third parties.” Tom Schreiber, a member of the Berlin House of Deputies, said the clans have exposed the moral bankruptcy of the German government: “The state promotes organized crime with taxpayer money.” -- Obviously if all these reports are true, Germany’s future is just as bleak as we all have believed it is. If this is what things are like when fighting-age native German men make up 50% of the nation, as they do now, what will things be like when they only make up 30%? Or 15%? -- Some in Germany are beginning to realize this: ...'

'Germany's first so-called liberal mosque has opened its doors in the capital, but according to its founder, the grand opening has been a struggle. Locals in Berlin are split over the idea of a mosque which has taken over from a Protestant church.' -- Europstan

'...“The problem on both sides of the pond, I’m sorry to say, is that our governments have – for most of the years since 9/11, especially – been in engaged in a practice that Andy McCarthy has called ‘willful blindness,’” Gaffney said, referring to the former prosecutor who worked on the first World Trade Center bombing, and now writes for National Review. “It’s actually gotten to the point he’s upped it to compulsory blindness.” -- “I think that’s a very apt term because if you are obliged by government policy to look the other way at red flags – and the Ummah gym might be one of them, but certainly mosques that are incubating jihadism every day, that are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, that are funded by the Saudis and the Qataris, that are known patrons of this sharia supremacist phenomenon – if you’re not allowed to understand those, let alone contend with them effectively in what a counterinsurgency strategy requires, which is action at the local level, well, guess what: this is going to continue to metastasize,” he warned. -- “When our enemies – and I’m talking here most especially about enemies within – perceive us behaving this way, they don’t think of it as, ‘Oh, there they go being politically correct!’ or ‘diversity sensitive’ or ‘multiculturally minded.’ They see it as submission. And what submission induces them to do, doctrinally under sharia, is to become more aggressive to make us feel subdued, as the Koran says, which means much more violence, and I’m afraid more insurgency of the worst kind,” said Gaffney. -- “When our enemies witness us submitting, they know it is God’s will being realized, which means they must engage in more jihad,” he said.'

'...It is a pure rage against a leadership so castrated by fear of offending anyone not specifically wielding a machete or a bomb, that they are impotent to take action. -- So frightened someone might cry Islamophobia, they peddle anything but the facts. They talk about 'the evil' that motivated the attacker, they talk about hate. They condemn 'the attack'. -- But still refuse to acknowledge the massive elephant in the room. They refuse to acknowledge any link between these attacks and Islamic extremism. Imagining that by failing to give such horror a label, they can somehow mystify it away — and distance Islamic extremism from blame. -- Even when ISIS called for these attacks in the ninth, Ramadan edition of their magazine, Rumiyah, urging their supporters to target civilians with edged weapons, firearms, vehicle ramming and fire, in locations such as shopping malls, restaurants and clubs. -- Even when an eyewitness, Eric, heard the attacker cry, 'This is for Allah,' we are supposed to swallow the news feed that the motive is unclear. -- Decent Brits are capable of understanding that these individuals do not represent all Muslims. (Though it would help us if ALL imams would stand up to denounce unequivocally these attacks committed in the name of their religion.) -- But the terrorists do represent a strand of Islamic extremism and the twisted beliefs of ISIS. They are motivated, determined, and not limited by fear of their own mortality. -- I say again: we need a lasting solution to terror. It is urgent. Imperative. We cannot go on like this. No one is carrying on as normal when our own Met police tweet for us to RUN, HIDE, TELL. -- Can you kid yourself you are 'carrying on as normal' as you are evicted from a bar with your hands on your head, running for your life? When our hospitals are in lock-down to protect even the sick from terror, no target is too soft. There is no humanity here. -- We have reached the ultimate tipping point, where even the hardy believers have lost hope, and those keen to cling to the narrative 'we stand defiant' are lying heartbroken on the floor. Even the most tolerant liberals are emailing me privately to let me know they doubt everything they believed before, that they can't tell their friends, but we have made mistakes and are paying the price. -- But you can take action. You are in control of your truth. -- Do not let them tell you we stand united. Do not let them tell you we are not cowed. Do not let them tell you we fight cowardice with British spirit. Do not buy into this propaganda, circulated by those who have failed us, the fascist liberals. -- ... Before the Bank Holiday weekend Mark Rowley, the UK’s most senior counter-terrorism officer suggested they’d rounded up much of the Manchester bomber’s ‘network’ and advised us all to: ‘Go out and enjoy yourselves.’ Well that’s exactly what the victims of last night’s attack were doing. Enjoying the multicultural heart of London, drinking and eating. Right up until someone stormed into the restaurant and stabbed them in the face with a 12-inch hunting knife. -- ... Do not let the liberals speak to you of protecting British values of tolerance and decency. Many extreme Islamists are fighting against the very values we cherish. They want to oppress and frighten our women and girls indoors. Islamic extremists are at war with our culture. They have no wish to integrate and are proud to live apart in ghettos of extremist hate. -- And they signpost themselves clearly. They are not hard to find. They are against the Prevent Strategy. They are the sickening preachers of CAGE, given platform by fawning liberals. They are monsters hiding in plain sight. And they are known to the authorities. -- To the police, the politicians, the people in power, I say this: we are sick, SICK, of hearing that these animals are known to the authorities. -- Why are we the casualties in a game of war where the human rights of the terrorists are prioritised above the right to life of our baby girls and regular Brits out with their families for a meal and a drink? -- Our process for dealing with terror cannot be words or vigils. It must be internment and deportation. And we keep deporting until our house is in order.'

'Protecting Islam from ridicule has had disastrous consequences. -- Another month, another terror attack. Britain’s third in three months. This time the targets were Saturday-night revellers in London Bridge and Borough. Mown and stabbed for the crime of having fun, of being free. And already we are seeing the same craven, baleful response that follows every act of Islamist terror. ‘Watch out for an Islamophobic backlash’, aloof observers say, their minds always more agitated by the thought of stupid white people saying something rude about Islam than by acts of Islamist mass murder. ‘Don’t say anything bad about this wonderful religion or its adherents’, they tell us. This is a really bad response, because it is becoming increasingly clear that one of the major problems we face today is not that our society is too mean about Islam, but that it flatters Islam too much. -- Islam now enjoys the same kind of moral protection from blasphemy and ridicule that Christianity once (wrongly) enjoyed. All last week, for example, I received furious emails and messages in response to two articles I wrote about the Manchester attack, telling me I was wrong to defend the use of the phrase ‘Islamist extremism’. That term has an Islamophobic bent to it, we’re told. It demeans Islam and its adherents by suggesting they have something to do with terrorism. You should just say ‘extremism’, not ‘Islamist extremism’. Don’t ever name the extremism, don’t label it, because you might hurt people’s feelings. -- This is why our political leaders so rarely use the terms Islamism, radical Islam and Islamic terrorism: because they want to avoid offending Islam and also because they don’t want to stir up what they view as the public’s bovine, hateful prejudices. This censorious privilege is not extended to any other religion. We do not avoid saying ‘Catholic paedophiles’ about the priests who molested children for fear of tarring all Catholics with the same brush. We happily say ‘Christian fundamentalist’ about people who are Christian and fundamentalist. We use ‘Buddhist extremists’ to describe violent Buddhist groups in Myanmar. And yet Islam is ringfenced from tough discussion; phrases which at some level include the word ‘Islam’ are tightly policed; criticism of Islam is deemed a mental illness: Islamophobia. -- This is incredibly dangerous. This censorious flattery of Islam is, in my view, a key contributor to the violence we have seen in recent years. Because when you constantly tell people that any mockery of their religion is tantamount to a crime, is vile and racist and unacceptable, you actively invite them, encourage them in fact, to become intolerant. You license their intolerance. You inflame their violent contempt for anyone who questions their dogmas. You provide a moral justification for their desire to punish those who insult their religion. -- From the 7/7 bombers to the Charlie Hebdo murderers to Salman Abedi in Manchester, all these terrorists — these Islamist terrorists — expressed an extreme victim mentality and openly said they were punishing us for our disrespect of Islam, mistreatment of Muslims, ridiculing of Muhammad, and so on. The Islamophobia industry and politicians who constantly say ‘Islam is great, leave Islam alone!’ green-light this violence; they furnish it with a moral case and moral zeal. -- There are no quick fixes to the terror problem, but here is a good start: oppose all censorship and all clampdowns on offence and blasphemy and so-called ‘Islamophobia’. Every single one of them, whether they’re legal, in the form of hate-speech laws, or informal, in the guise of Twittermobs against those who criticise Islam or self-censoring politicians being literally struck dumb on TV because they cannot muster up the word ‘Is… is… is… Islamist’. This will at least start the process of unravelling the Islamist victimhood narrative and its bizarre, violent and officially sanctioned sensitivity to criticism. And if anyone says this is ‘punching down’ — another intellectual weapon in the armoury of Islam-protecting censorship, designed to demonise awkward questions about certain religious and ideological beliefs — tell them that it is in fact punching up: up against a political class and legal system that has foolishly and outrageously sought to police criticism of a religion. -- What this means is that the supposedly correct response to terror attacks — ‘Don’t criticise Islam’ — is absolutely the worst response. It pours petrol on fire. It inflames the violent religious narcissism and self-pity that motors many of these attacks. Making criticism of Islam as commonplace and acceptable as criticism of any other religion or ideology is the first step to denuding Islamist terrorism of its warped moral programme, and it will also demonstrate that our society prizes freedom of speech over everything else — including your religion, your God, your prophets, your holy book and your feelings.'

'The Muslim population of Britain surpassed 3.5 million in 2015 to become around 5.5% of the overall population of 64 million, according to figures extrapolated from a recent study on the growth of the Muslim population in Europe. In real terms, Britain has the third-largest Muslim population in the European Union, after France, then Germany. -- The survey was conducted by ICM Research for the Channel 4 documentary, "What British Muslims Really Think," which aired on April 13. -- The 615-page survey found that more than 100,000 British Muslims sympathize with suicide bombers and people who commit other terrorist acts. Moreover, only one in three British Muslims (34%) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with jihadists. -- In addition, 23% of British Muslims said Islamic Sharia law should replace British law in areas with large Muslim populations. -- In an essay for the Sunday Times, Trevor Phillips, the host of the documentary and a former head of Britain's Equality and Human Rights Commission, warned of a growing "chasm" between Muslims and non-Muslims in Britain that "isn't going to disappear any time soon." -- Phillips wrote that the poll reveals "the unacknowledged creation of a nation within the nation, with its own geography, its own values and its own very separate future." He added: "I thought Europe's Muslims would gradually blend into the landscape. I should have known better." -- Phillips was referring to his role in commissioning the 1997 report, "Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All." Also known as the Runnymede Report, the document popularized the term "Islamophobia" in Britain and had a singular role in silencing criticism of mass immigration from the Muslim world. Twenty years later, Phillips now concedes that he has had a change of heart. -- In an essay for the Daily Mail, Phillips, wrote: "There is a life-and-death struggle for the soul of British Islam — and this is not a battle that the rest of us can afford to sit out. We need to take sides. -- "Four per cent — the equivalent of more than 100,000 British Muslims — told the researchers that they had sympathy for people who take part in suicide bombing to fight injustice. Asked if they knew that someone was involved with supporting terrorism in Syria, just one in three would report it to the police. -- "There is one truly terrifying finding. Muslims who have separatist views about how they want to live in Britain are far more likely to support terrorism than those who do not. And there are far too many of the former for us to feel that we can gradually defeat the threat. -- "Liberal-minded Muslims have been saying for some time that our live-and-let-live attitudes have allowed a climate to grow in which extremist ideas have flourished within Britain's Muslim communities. Our politicians have tried to reassure us that only a tiny minority hold dangerous views. -- "All the while, girls are shipped off to have their genitals mutilated, young women and men are being pressured into marriages they do not want, and teenagers are being seduced into donning suicide vests or becoming jihadi brides. -- "We have 'understood' too much, and challenged too little — and in doing so are in danger of sacrificing a generation of young British people to values that are antithetical to the beliefs of most of us, including many Muslims. -- "In my view, we have to adopt a far more muscular approach to integration than ever, replacing the failed policy of multiculturalism." -- Philips added: "Muslims want to be part of Britain — but many do not accept the values and behaviors that make Britain what it is; they believe that Islam offers a better future. And a small number feel that these sincerely held beliefs justify attempts to destroy our democracy. -- "Britain's liberal Muslims are crying out for this challenge to be confronted. The complacency we've displayed so far is leaving them to fight alone, and putting our society in danger. We cannot continue to sit on the fence in the hope that the problem will go away." -- The survey does show that 88% of British Muslims believe Britain is a good place for Muslims to live. According to Philips, this is because the tolerance they enjoy in the UK allows them to do whatever they want.'

"This is what escalation looks like". -- 'UK: What British Muslims Really Think: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7861/british-muslims-survey -- The Muslim population of Britain surpassed 3.5 million in 2015 to become around 5.5% of the overall population of 64 million, according to figures extrapolated from a recent study on the growth of the Muslim population in Europe. In real terms, Britain has the third-largest Muslim population in the European Union, after France, then Germany. -- The survey was conducted by ICM Research for the Channel 4 documentary, "What British Muslims Really Think," which aired on April 13. -- The 615-page survey found that more than 100,000 British Muslims sympathize with suicide bombers and people who commit other terrorist acts. Moreover, only one in three British Muslims (34%) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with jihadists. -- In addition, 23% of British Muslims said Islamic Sharia law should replace British law in areas with large Muslim populations. -- In an essay for the Sunday Times, Trevor Phillips, the host of the documentary and a former head of Britain's Equality and Human Rights Commission, warned of a growing "chasm" between Muslims and non-Muslims in Britain that "isn't going to disappear any time soon." -- Phillips wrote that the poll reveals "the unacknowledged creation of a nation within the nation, with its own geography, its own values and its own very separate future." He added: "I thought Europe's Muslims would gradually blend into the landscape. I should have known better." -- Phillips was referring to his role in commissioning the 1997 report, "Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All." Also known as the Runnymede Report, the document popularized the term "Islamophobia" in Britain and had a singular role in silencing criticism of mass immigration from the Muslim world. Twenty years later, Phillips now concedes that he has had a change of heart. -- In an essay for the Daily Mail, Phillips, wrote: "There is a life-and-death struggle for the soul of British Islam — and this is not a battle that the rest of us can afford to sit out. We need to take sides. -- "Four per cent — the equivalent of more than 100,000 British Muslims — told the researchers that they had sympathy for people who take part in suicide bombing to fight injustice. Asked if they knew that someone was involved with supporting terrorism in Syria, just one in three would report it to the police. -- "There is one truly terrifying finding. Muslims who have separatist views about how they want to live in Britain are far more likely to support terrorism than those who do not. And there are far too many of the former for us to feel that we can gradually defeat the threat. -- "Liberal-minded Muslims have been saying for some time that our live-and-let-live attitudes have allowed a climate to grow in which extremist ideas have flourished within Britain's Muslim communities. Our politicians have tried to reassure us that only a tiny minority hold dangerous views. -- "All the while, girls are shipped off to have their genitals mutilated, young women and men are being pressured into marriages they do not want, and teenagers are being seduced into donning suicide vests or becoming jihadi brides. -- "We have 'understood' too much, and challenged too little — and in doing so are in danger of sacrificing a generation of young British people to values that are antithetical to the beliefs of most of us, including many Muslims. -- "In my view, we have to adopt a far more muscular approach to integration than ever, replacing the failed policy of multiculturalism." -- Philips added: "Muslims want to be part of Britain — but many do not accept the values and behaviors that make Britain what it is; they believe that Islam offers a better future. And a small number feel that these sincerely held beliefs justify attempts to destroy our democracy. -- "Britain's liberal Muslims are crying out for this challenge to be confronted. The complacency we've displayed so far is leaving them to fight alone, and putting our society in danger. We cannot continue to sit on the fence in the hope that the problem will go away." -- The survey does show that 88% of British Muslims believe Britain is a good place for Muslims to live. According to Philips, this is because the tolerance they enjoy in the UK allows them to do whatever they want.'

'Abedi was not disenfranchised. He was not rejected by British society. He was taught to reject and hate it, despite everything it gave him and his family. His older sister has reportedly said that Abedi was looking for ‘revenge’ for the ‘ill-treatment’ of Muslims in the UK and Syria. This is the circular logic of the Islamist victimhood narrative that almost every Muslim growing up in the UK will have been exposed to at one time or another. Western governments, and therefore Western societies, are to blame for all instances of intervention in Muslim majority countries, and are equally culpable should they fail to intervene. -- Manchester and Birmingham are home to some of the most militant Islamists in the UK. They mingle and operate throughout local Muslim communities with relative impunity, and maintain networks up and down the M1 motorway to London. They also have a significant presence online with which they extend their influence globally. At the level of propaganda, at least, they’re not an underground movement. They are out in the open. -- While living safely under Britain’s rule of law, they nonetheless view British society as beneath contempt. They don’t want to be part of it, and they teach people like Salman Abedi that it’s a mortal sin for them to want to be part of it. Anything that happens to a Muslim anywhere in the world, once passed through the Islamist victimhood filter, becomes an anti-Muslim act for which the guilty must be punished. And so it seems that Abedi’s actions were the result of this solipsistic staple of Islamist indoctrination. In a country, and a city, where young men run the risk of falling prey to knife crime, Abedi interpreted the stabbing of a friend as an anti-Muslim ‘hate crime’, and swore revenge on the society around him. -- Those who look down their noses at the rise of nationalist sentiment in Europe have never lived cheek by jowl with people who hate their adopted country the way British Islamists do. -- ... Islamists, for decades, have regarded Britain not as a family, but as a place to eat and sleep on their way to somewhere else. While the privileged wring their hands and wonder what they might have done to offend their exotic guests, those to whom the house belongs are beginning to pipe up and object. Whenever they do – for example, when their kids are murdered at a pop concert – their more sophisticated relatives seem mostly preoccupied with the desire to avoid a scene. -- Openly discussing Islamism is not an attack on me or any other British Muslim. We are the hostages of Islamism and its vampire preachers who weaponised Salman Abedi and used him to slaughter 22 innocents, in the midst of their joy, out of sheer spite. Speaking frankly and honestly about this horror is the only hope we have of emerging from it as anything resembling a cohesive British family.'

'After the terror, the platitudes. And the hashtags. And the candlelit vigils. And they always have the same message: ‘Be unified. Feel love. Don’t give in to hate.’ The banalities roll off the national tongue. Vapidity abounds. A shallow fetishisation of ‘togetherness’ takes the place of any articulation of what we should be together for – and against. And so it has been after the barbarism in Manchester. In response to the deaths of more than 20 people at an Ariana Grande gig, in response to the massacre of children enjoying pop music, people effectively say: ‘All you need is love.’ The disparity between these horrors and our response to them, between what happened and what we say, is vast. This has to change. -- ... As part of the post-terror narrative, our emotions are closely policed. Some emotions are celebrated, others demonised. Empathy – good. Grief – good. Sharing your sadness online – great. But hatred? Anger? Fury? These are bad. They are inferior forms of feeling, apparently, and must be discouraged. -- ... That the post-terror narrative is fundamentally about taming our passion and politics is clear from its sidelining of all issues of substance. We are actively warned against asking difficult questions about 21st-century society and why it has this violence in it, this nihilism in it. Question the wisdom of multiculturalism, of refusing to elevate one culture over another and instead encouraging people to live in their own cultural bubbles, and you’re racist. Wonder if the obsession with combatting ‘Islamophobia’ might have given rise to a situation where some Muslims, especially younger ones, cannot handle ridicule of their religion, and… well, you’re ‘Islamophobic’. As for immigration: this is the great unmentionable; you’re a fascist even for thinking about it. The post-terror narrative that barks ‘You must empathise!’ also says, implicitly, and sometimes explicitly, ‘You mustn’t think! You mustn’t ask those questions or say that thing.’ And so in their response to terrorism, they erect an intellectual forcefield around some of the problems that might, just might, be contributing to that terrorism. -- We need unity, they say. Unity’s their buzzword. But this is substanceless, too. Unity around what? Unity against what? What are our values? Who is the enemy of those values? Don’t ask. Don’t think. It is wrong to have core values in a society built on diversity, apparently, and we mustn’t ever suggest that any particular ideology poses a threat to those values, because that might involve ‘punching down’, singling people out, etc. We end up with a unity of shallow feeling, a union of highly individuated mourners, not a unity around real ideals and things and vision. Their cry of unity is a lie. The fact is there are people in our society willing to attack us, others who will think those attacks are justified, and others still who will apologise for those attacks by saying they’re a product of ‘Islamophobia’ or Western intervention overseas. We are so far from united. We are deeply divided. But you cannot say that. ‘Weep, don’t think.’ -- Stop and think about how strange it is, how perverse it is, that more than 20 of our citizens have been butchered and we are basically saying: ‘Everyone calm down. Love is the answer.’ Where’s the rage? If the massacre of children and their parents on a fun night out doesn’t make you feel rage, nothing will. The terrorist has defeated you. You are dead already.'

'France, Sweden, Germany and other European nations are on a path to legalize rape committed by migrants because it’s “their culture.” -- As shocking as this might seem, a recent number of rapists who avoided severe punishment suggests there’s a precedent already in place to decriminalize rapes by migrants because they don’t “culturally understand” Western rape laws or even the word “no.” -- In short, rapes by migrants are downplayed as “cultural misunderstandings” and thus the victims never receive justice, meaning that “de facto” rape legalization is, for the most part, already in place. -- For example, a German judge recently acquitted a Turkish drug dealer of rape despite believing “every word” of the 23-year-old victim’s accusation because, according to the judge, what the victim “had experienced as rape,” including having her head shoved between two bed posts after she said no, might be “culturally” considered “wild sex” in Turkey. -- “The prosecutor admitted that the acquittal must have been a heavy blow to the victim,” reported the Märkische Allegemeine, translated from German. “On the other hand a conviction was not possible because there was no demonstrated intent of rape [by the accused.]” -- Even more, the Turkish man claimed that because he wouldn’t have committed a rape because he had a mother and a sister. -- “The leftist narrative has indoctrinated German natives so strongly that their inclusive multicultural respect and bureaucratic conformism is even able to warp what is beyond doubt rape into an offensive cultural question, a question both a legal authority and the sexually assaulted woman answered yes to,” remarked Damian Black with Return of Kings. “Nothing was hidden, nothing concealed; all evidence was confirmed and understood, only to be disregarded as an ethnic misunderstanding.”'

"...They use our sympathies for these people...What they know is that you care. They don't care. But they know that you care. And they use that to hurt you. To have feelings in a world of cold-hearted manipulators is to have a giant fishhook in your cheek that anyone can yank on at will. And the cessation of sympathy is one of the elemental disciplines that moralists need to develop. Because we've got this idea that morality is kindness. That morality is niceness. That morality is sympathy and empathy and hugs. No, no, no. That's not what morality is at all...Morality is not about being nice. Now, evil people want you to think morality is about being nice, why? Because if evil people can get you to think morality is about being nice, well first of all you're going to become very non-confrontational. Isn't that convenient for evil people. If they can get you to believe that morality is about being nice and thoughtful and considerate and sincere and warm-hearted and sympathetic and empathetic and lovely...you are disarmed and evil wins. And of course we're thirsty to believe that evil can be beaten with niceness, that morality is about being nice; because we prefer – those of us who are nice – we prefer to be nice rather than be to confrontational with people, than to upset people, than to alarm people, than to interfere with the plans of evil people...Niceness – in terms of morality – what does it get you? Well, it gets you being exploited? Once you understand that evil people run the world it becomes a lot simpler. That's the foundation, that's the gravity well you need to organize your physics around. Evil people run the world. Evil people trained you, evil people indoctrinated you, evil people run the education system, they run the media, the entertainment system – they run everything. Evil, malevolent, destructive people. When you understand that everything you've learned about morality serves the interests of evil people, it becomes a lot easier. Everything you've learned about being good was taught to you by evil people so that you'd be easier to manipulate and won't interfere with their plans. Of course. Of course. In the same way that farmers...have domesticated animals by repeatedly breeding the nicest animals, the calmest animals, the most friendly animals. And your ethics have been domesticated in the same way...And now if you're not nice, you're bad...[Niceness] has become such a foundational ethic and people have become so cowardly – niceness is just an excuse for cowardice and an excuse for people to vent their frustrations at being morally impotent because they turn on anyone who is not nice and attack them, and vent all of their cowardly spleen on the person who is not nice...They have been infected with this niceness, and niceness in ethics is just a synonym for cowardice. And so cowardice becomes a virtue. Which means when cowardice becomes a virtue, courage becomes a vice...Niceness is to lie to people. That's all that niceness means is lie to people...What is niceness? Niceness just means manage other people's emotional hyper-sensitivity and dysfunctional immaturity by creating a fantasy world of safe-spaces and benevolent Otherness so that their reality doesn't get disturbed...Niceness means turning society into an asylum ward of appeasement of hypersensitive crazy people that you are weakening by appeasing. Niceness means lying to crazy people and attacking courageous people...What happens is evil people don't need to oppose good, courageous moralists because the nice-addicted mob will automatically attack the honest, direct truth-tellers who have integrity and who are willing to be confrontational in the service of virtue. They will be attacked by all those addicted to nice because if a courageous person really displays moral courage and virtue and honesty and integrity then the people who have been infected with the nice virus recognize that they're not healthy but are in fact diseased; they recognize that they're not courageous, they are in fact cowardly; they recognize that niceness is not opposing evil but niceness is a form of horizontal viciousness and falsehood that serves the needs of evil people and that they're not good but are actually in the service of immorality; they're foot soldiers in the darkening clouds that are overtaking the world. And when someone has been lied into believing that evil is good, true goodness is what they attack much more than the liar who drugged them to begin with."

'Two migrants have been given sentences of three and two-and-a-half years for beating a young Swede almost to death before violently raping his female friend. The government will try to deport only one of them, temporarily. -- ... One of the girls invited a 21-year-old migrant from Liberia, Richelieu Jarara, with whom she was acquainted. This man brought another African migrant, a Kenyan named Fayed Mwangi, with him. -- Before long, the migrants began sexually harassing the girls. Matters quickly escalated from there, with the pair conferring briefly before spraying the male Swede in the face with pepper spray. -- The Freie Zeiten describes how they then beat and kicked the Swede with “brutal force”, leaving him with “multiple cerebral haemorrhages, severe swelling and bruises all over his body, as well as bone fractures and open wounds”. -- The three girls, as well as the attackers, thought the young man had been beaten to death, with Jarara actually uploading a video to Snapchat in which he made light of having “killed a guy”. -- The Swede was, in fact, still alive, but unconscious and permanently brain damaged. -- Jarara’s younger companion, 19-year-old Mwangi, is said to have “strangled” one of the girls when she tried to intervene, slamming her into a wall and “hurling” her to the floor. -- The Kenyan then grabbed another of the girls by the hair, dragged her into the bedroom and raped her. She was also strangled, with the Kenyan threatening to strike her if she screamed. -- The ordeal was finally brought to an end when a neighbour burst into the apartment, allowing the girls to flee. -- According to the Fria Tider, the court sentenced Mwangi to just two-and-a-half years for his crimes, despite having raped another woman in May 2016. The government will attempt to deport him afterwards – although he will be allowed to return to the country after ten years, and judges have prevented other European countries, such as the United Kingdom, from following through on deporting criminal migrants after their sentences in the past. -- Jarara, who has a string of previous convictions for crimes including theft, serious bodily injury, and resisting arrest, was given a slightly longer sentence – three years – but he will not be deported.'

'Remember when the media and all those leftie luvvie celebrities laughed at me for warning about mass immigration and Sweden? Not so funny now is it?' -- "They'd rather be dead than be called a 'racist'."

'...Published Friday, the document was commissioned by Sweden’s Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), part of the country’s Ministry of Defence, which is responsible for civil protection and public safety. -- The paper’s authors claim the Brotherhood is working to increase the number of practicing Muslims in Sweden, encouraging tension with Secular society, and targeting political parties, NGOs, academic institutions and other civil society organisations. -- They also slam the “established structure of values among the country’s political elite [which] places a high value on ‘acceptance’ and ‘tolerance’ of citizens who are in some sense different from the mainstream”. -- In the report, the Islamism of the MB is described as a totalitarian political ideology born out of Islam, a religion. This can make it “difficult to oppose what on the surface appears to be (a vulnerable minority) religious rights”, it explains. -- Critics, therefore, “run the risk of being called ‘racist’ or ‘Islamophobic’ and because of the situation in Swedish society such classifications endanger people’s careers”. -- ... Controversially in Sweden, the report also links Islamism and poor social integration to immigration. -- “Islamists aim to build a parallel social structure competing with the rest of the Swedish society the values of its citizens. In this sense, MB’s activists pose a long-term challenge in terms of the country’s social cohesion”, it states. Adding: "Migration from Africa and the Middle East is likely to continue in coming years, both in form of relatives and refugees…"'

'"The President of the European Parliament (EP) called for massive investments in Africa on Tuesday, warning that millions of African migrants could arrive otherwise." -- Notice, the rabbit, extrapolating his rabbit urges to Africa, believes that to prevent the migration you need to flood Africa with free resource availability. -- Africa will go from 13% of the worlds population at 2000, to 25% by 2050. That’s going from 811 million to 2.2 billion. Back between 1750 and 1800, before external support of the population with free resources provided from technologically advanced societies, Africa had a population of about 106 million. I’d view that as the carrying capacity of the environment, absent external intervention. If you had minimal intervention, of the sort I would expect in a global economic apocalypse, you might double that. -- If the next economic Apocalypse is what it appears it will be, and it hit at around 2050, you would have about 2 billion Africans who would all feel their choice would be to stay put and starve, or to migrate to a land of increased resource availability, in this case, Europe. -- Most K-strategist societies today use some of their wealth to buy the pacification of the r-selected savages, so they can enjoy the peace – while the r-strategists multiply. The problem is the r-strategists are modern day tribbles. Eventually they multiply up to the point that you cannot keep them all alive because there just aren’t enough resources. -- If you have been buying your peace long enough, you may also have bought the long-term destruction of your own society, because once tribbles multiply to sizable enough numbers and the economic conditions collapse, it will be enormously difficult to stop your nation from being buried beneath a tidal wave of r-strategist tribbles. When the collapse comes, aid to Africa will plummet, and Europe will have a flood of African migrants of unprecedented proportions. -- I suppose that will be one advantage to being in North America, provided we can keep our own liberals from importing a sizable enough seed population of r-selected tribbles between now and the collapse.'

'Sweden doesn’t have problems? http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/727574/Sweden-chaos-Police-pushed-breaking-point-unprecedented-violence-crime "SWEDEN is on the brink of becoming a lawless state as the police force is losing the battle against unprecedented levels of crime and violence amid a growing migrant crisis. -- The Scandinavian country is facing an existential crisis with on average three police officers handing in their resignations a day. -- If the alarming trend continues, and police officers continue to resign more than 1,000 officers will have quit the service by New Years… -- But police have now admitted the force has reached breaching point as more than 50 areas in the country have now been placed on a “no-go zone” list. -- In February a report from Sweden’s National Criminal Investigation Service announced there were 52 areas where officers would not cope with the levels of crime being committed… -- Now the Police Association have said they need at least 200 new officers to regain control in the south-east of the country." -- ... Notice it is both the media and the political leadership – two occupations that are awarded undue power and resources for enduring essentially no real threats, responsibilities, or sacrifices – that are so eager to cater to the foreign out-group that they will facilitate attacks on their own people: "Journalist Ami Horowitz told Fox News people high up in the Swedish government are deliberately covering up and protecting perpetrators of rapes to protect “vulnerable” migrants. -- During an explosive interview on Friday, Mr Horowitz claimed the refugee violence crisis was out of control but that “European virtues” had put a stop to any discussion on the statistics… -- Horowitz said: “Sweden consider themselves a humanitarian superpower, perhaps the only superpower they could possibly qualify for. -- “So they want to open up their borders up to everyone and anyone. -- “From the onset of the refugee crisis, there was a surge in gun violence and rape – the statistics were clear. -- “But locals were just said ‘it was men, not refugees’ so the majority in Sweden still want to have an open door policy. It’s confounding, really.” -- He continued: “The Swedish government try to cover up refugee rapes. -- “There were a spate of violent attacks and sexual assaults at a music festival but officials tried to cover up who the perpetrators were. -- “The government has gone out of its way to cover up these figures.”"

'..."Chancellor Angela Merkel is setting aside €90m (£76m) in taxpayers’ money to create a fund which will pay migrants to withdraw their asylum applications and leave Germany voluntarily. The handouts will form part of a 16-point plan to speed up the removal of rejected asylum seekers, after Tunisian migrant Anis Amri murdered a Polish lorry driver, hijacked his vehicle and drove it into a Christmas market in Berlin while awaiting deportation. -- U.S. president Donald Trump told The Times that Merkel made a “catastrophic mistake” when she opened the doors to an unlimited number of migrants in 2015. Her vice-chancellor, Sigmar Gabriel, admitted that his superior had underestimated how difficult it would be to integrate migrants on such a grand scale, and that Germany had been plunged into a kulturkampf, or “cultural war”, as a result." -- So this dumb bimbo invited all these tools in just to hand them checks, drawn on the German taxpayer’s bank accounts, and beg them to return home. And she is giving all that money away as a global economic collapse is closing in. How is anybody even considering re-electing her? The idiocy in this epoch actually hurts when you think about it.'

'...The Romans invited barbarians to hold high office, and now in our decline, our Democrats are doing the same with the Muslims. These r-selected liberals are recreating what they are designed for – existing under an oppressive leadership in a foreign land, which they migrated to in order to find r-selected free resource availability. -- Jewish Democrats who support the Muslims are clearly not acting logically. You cannot begin to imply any aspect of these political actions are based in logic. If the Muslims grow in number, as they will, the radicals will take over. The moderate Muslims will gladly let the radicals take over so all non-Muslims will be oppressed and they can enjoy an easy advantage. -- From there, it is a small leap to Holocaust 2.0, only the Muslims will likely not fail to complete the job this time around. -- All of politics is r/K Selection Theory. Logic has nothing to do with it.'

'My most agitated liberal friend sent me a link today about Justin Trudeau announcing Canada would take all of the Trump-banned immigrants because diversity is their strength. My friend said that was an example of real leadership. -- His conclusion is debatable, but didn’t Canada just solve all of Trump’s problems? If humane treatment of immigrants is the goal, Canada is the right place. They have polite behavior, free healthcare, and lots of space. That’s a win-win-win. Or am I missing something? -- Canada also gives us a test case to compare to America’s plan. In five years we can check back and see how it turned out for them. If it worked, we can reassess. Until then we obviously need to wall-off Canada. But that’s another topic. -- Now that I think about it, the Middle East has a lot of space too. Remind me again why Muslim countries are banning Muslim immigrants. Is it because they are Hitler?'

'...we collectively fail to distinguish between good and bad versions of selfishness. The good, desirable kind involves the courage to give priority to ourselves and our concerns at particular points; the confidence to be forthright about our needs, not in order to harm or conclusively reject other people, but in order to serve them in a deeper, more sustained and committed way over the long term. Bad selfishness, on the other hand, operates with no greater end in view and with no higher motive in mind. We’re not declining to help so as to marshal our resources to offer others a greater gift down the line; we just can’t be bothered. -- Unfortunately, afflicted by confusion about this distinction, we frequently fail to state our needs as clearly as we should, with disastrous results precisely for those we’re meant to serve. In order to be a good parent, we may need to have an hour to ourselves every day. We may need to take a long time in a hot shower to mull over events. We may need to do something that seems a bit indulgent, like life-drawing or a clarinet lesson. But because we sense how contrary to expectations these desires can seem, we opt to stay quiet about our requirements – and so grow increasingly ragged, angry and bitter with those who rely on us. A lack of selfishness turns us, slowly, into highly disagreeable as well as ineffective people. -- ... Good selfishness grows out of an accurate understanding of what we need in order to maximise our utility for others. It stems from an unembarrassed sense of how we should develop our abilities, get our minds into the right frame, summon up our most useful powers and organize our thoughts and feelings so that they can be eventually helpful to the world. We recognise that we will at select moments have to back out of doing things that people would like us to – and have no compunction about politely explaining this in good time; unlike the selfless who will dutifully smile, then one day explode in vindictive exhausted rage. We know, as kind egoists, that we may be confused with the mean-spirited, but our innate conviction of our sincerity lends us the calm to pursue our aims in our own way. -- The trick is to become better ambassadors of our intentions, learning persuasively to convey to those around us that we’re not lazy or callous but will simply better serve their needs by not doing the expected things for a while. Sweet people run the strange – but highly important – risk of becoming a nuisance to others by what is only ever superficially a good idea: never putting themselves first.'

'...Imagine, an invasion is forthcoming. Throughout history, the solution has been to raise an army, and fend it off kinetically. Now, the solution is to dump money into the invading nation, so the invaders will be too happy in their homeland to bother you. Only r/K Selection Theory can help you to understand the prevailing forces in history, and the forces driving events today. -- r turns into K, and the more r there is, the faster it happens, because r produces K. If you could eliminate all r, wealth and success would increase infinitely, until some r had to re-enter the system. As that r eventually grew, it would then erode wealth and success, until K returned. r and K are yin and yang, you have to have both because they produce each other, and are integral to each other’s existence. -- Now, as the economic Apocalypse approaches, these idiots will blow all of the remaining capital and credit on trying to repair irreparably corrupt and incompetent governments. If only you invest in Africa corruption while shorting Europe’s economic future. K will only come that much faster – and then you will still have to eventually repel all of the migrants from the entire world with violence, because this migration wave is nothing compared to what you will see when the Apocalypse hits. But for a rabbit with an r-adapted brain all of that is impossible to process.'

'There are some people on the left who are actually pretty reasonable when it comes to issues of Western Civilization, the clash of civilizations question, European-Suicidalism, etc. They recognize that mass-Muslim immigration is creating a terrible, terrible situation in Europe, and they reject the policies of people like Angela Merkel, dismissing her insane drive to Islamize Germany as either a) blindness to reality, or b) an unfortunate and somewhat tragic excess of zeal in the realm of humanitarianism and human rights. -- Despite this however, these individuals are usually highly reluctant to label such beliefs as anything more than those of a ‘kooky fringe’. They think that ‘white self-hatred” and what we would call ‘ethno-masochism’ or “European-Suicidalism” is confined to perhaps 1-5% of the population. -- It makes sense for them to view the world this way, for if they didn’t, and they acknowledged that these ideas are the pillars the modern Left is built upon, they would be labeling themselves as part of them. They are too logical to do this, but still harbor too much inherent distrust and animus of anything ‘right-wing’ to admit that the left has in effect left them behind. -- ...[what] those who are ‘partially awakened’ on the left still do not realize is to just what extent such thinking [whites neither deserve welfare nor protection] now controls the policies of Western Governments. -- Lawrence Murray has an excellent article on this on Atlantic Centurion. In it he describes the utter and complete normalization within Western societies’ since the 1960’s of the idea of governments “forcibly and permanently displacing [their White majorities] in the name of utopian goals.” -- Murray is talking about America, but in Europe this program of “minoritization” (to steal a word from his article) has become even more pronounced, and is being accomplished in a quicker and more violent manner. -- Beyond just these demographic results however, are the millions of individual acts of violence and suffering that result. These include the thousands of elderly Europeans beaten and robbed by immigrants every year; the 1400 little girls raped and tortured by Muslims in Rotherham, yet ignored in the 2015 UK Election; the hundreds of thousands just like them across the UK and Europe who are raped and enslaved every year; the thousands of Europeans killed in terrorist attacks; the countless European schoolchildren assaulted daily by Muslim classmates who are told by their teachers they are not allowed to fight back; and an infinitely ongoing list of victims that are the end results of such forces...'

'http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/12/24/lefties-marching-aleppo-stop-war/ ... Notice how often liberals assert there is no objective truth. Nobody is right or wrong, nothing can be judged, all humans are equally smart, and capable, and moral, etc, etc, etc. -- If you are logical and can see and judge honestly, it is tempting to think this is just liberals trying to lend some measure of support for their untenable positions. But they may just be honestly explaining how they see the world – indecipherable and impossible to understand. -- Here you have leftists who are actually going to march straight into the center of ISIS’s territory. They even say they don’t know where to protest here, because they have no idea who is running things. -- These are psychologies which have never actually had to endure adverse consequences for bad decisions, and as a result they will walk right into an area where people are routinely having their heads sawn off, being burned alive, and killed in every way imaginable – and they don’t see anything wrong with that. -- This is the reason the entire world is set to burn to the ground. These morons have no idea what is going on, who is responsible, or what will happen – and yet they are hell-bent on getting in there and dictating events themselves, even though they have no ability to predict what will cause an adverse outcome.'