Measurement uncertainty

The IAEA/WHO Network, through Secondary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories (SSDLs) designated by the Member States, provides a direct linkage of national dosimetry standards to the international measurement system (SI, for Système International). Through the proper calibration of field instruments by the SSDLs, these measurements are traceable to the Primary Standards Dosimetry Laboratories (PSDLs) and the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). The Network has proven to be of value in improving national capabilities for instrument calibration and the level of awareness of the need for better accuracy and traceability [1]. To ensure that the services provided by SSDL members to end users follow internationally accepted standards, the IAEA has set up a comparison programme using ionization chambers. In this way, the laboratories verify the integrity of their national standards and the procedures used for the transfer of the standards to the end users [1]. During the implementation of the comparison programme, the IAEA identified important discrepancies in the way SSDLs report their calibration uncertainty. Although the general Guidance on the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) was published by ISO in 1995 [3], no specific publication deals with the implementation of the ISO guidance in the calibration of dosimeters. The need to prepare a guidance document for SSDL members on this topic was recognized by the IAEA and supported by the IAEA Standing Advisory Group, the Scientific Committee of the IAEA/WHO SSDL Network organized in 2004 [4].

A guidance document on the assessment of measurement uncertainty will also benefit SSDLs that signed the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) of National Measurement Standards and of the Calibration and Measurement certificates Issued by the National Metrology Institutes. The IAEA signed the MRA in October 1999 and has, since then, contributed to strengthening the SSDL capabilities in this field. The signing by the IAEA of the MRA imposes stricter demands on its dosimetry comparisons and may require a modification of the criteria of acceptability of the level of performance achieved by SSDLs in these comparisons.

A common procedure for uncertainty assessment among all SSDL Network members would greatly facilitate the review of comparison results by the IAEA and other regional or international institutions.

The purpose of this publication is to provide guidance to SSDLs on how to assess and report measurement uncertainty related to their calibration services in a way that is consistent with the GUM. It includes a review of the calibration procedures and model equations used by SSDLs in Section 2, a tutorial part on how to assess the various uncertainty components in Section 3, and two practical examples of typical calibrations in 60Co gamma ray beams. The practical examples, linked to the concepts described in Sections 2 and 3, are given to help the user in preparing the uncertainty budget. Although the scope of this publication is limited to a model equation used in 60Co gamma beam for radiotherapy dosimetry, the concept can be extended to cover X ray dosimetry for radiotherapy and radiation protection dosimetry. For the calibration of instruments used in diagnostic radiology, the guidance given in IAEA technical Reports Series No. 457 [5] should be followed.

Related articles

A primary temperature scale requires realising a unit in terms of its definition. For high temperature radiation thermometry in terms of the International Temperature Scale of 1990 this means extrapolating from the signal measured at the freezing temperature of gold, silver or copper using Planck`s radiation law. The difficulty in doing this means that primary scales above 1000 °C require specialist equipment and careful characterisation in order to achieve the extrapolation with sufficient accuracy. As such,...

Snow- and glacier melt are important contributors to river discharge in high-elevated areas of the Himalayan region. Thus, it is important that the key processes controlling snow and glacier accumulation and melting, are well represented in hydrological models. In this study, the sensitivity of modelled discharge to different snowmelt parameterizations was evaluated. A distributed hydrological model that operated on a 1 × 1 km2 grid at a daily time resolution was applied to a high-elevated mountainous basin, the...

A key element in radiation protection programs at commercial nuclear power plants, nuclear research facilities, fuel fabrication plants and regulatory agency oversight programs of licensees is management's ability to validate the accuracy of the many air sampling instruments utilized in the facility's radiation protection air monitoring programs.
The volume of air sampled in each sample event is responsible for the quantity of radioactive pollutants deposited on the filter media utilized in each of the specific...

Positron lifetime measurements are used as a tool for obtaining a deeper understanding of positron behaviour in solids and calibrating the Chalmers Pulsed Positron Beam. Experiments are executed for positron energies up to 13 keV corresponding to the maximum penetration depth in Au of roughly 400 nm and measurement results are compared to PENELOPE simulations. Reference towards Makhov modelling is made. The future goal of the study is to investigate the depth dependence of ion–induced radiation damage where...

Knowledge of solar radiation at the ground surface is valuable for many disciplines. In this study, ground–based sensors at Fortuna and Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, were used to calibrate daily–integrated satellite–derived solar radiation. The calibration equations yielded R² values of 0.88 and 0.83 at Fortuna and Mayaguez, respectively. A regression equation was also derived based on the combined data from the two locations with an R² of 0.87. The calibration equations for Fortuna and UPRM...

Customer comments

No comments were found for Measurement uncertainty. Be the first to comment!