Chemtrail add

Well then, since this has supposedly been happening since the mid 90's why is there no pictures of these spraying planes, and nobody seems to know
where they are flying from and exactly what they are spraying.

Guess your right same story and no evidence...typical chemtrail thread.

The year 1907 by this site www.holmestead.ca..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Wow appears to have some connection to the affects of
aluminium to us.

As a footnote - aluminum is a twentieth century metal and Alzheimer's disease is a twentieth century fact. In 1907, Dr. Alois Alzheimer, a German
psychiatrist and neuropathologist, first described a new ailment now known as Alzheimer's Disease. Dr. Alzheimer's discovery occurred approximately
twenty years after aluminum was introduced and became a widely used product.

Yet they continued and to this day selling it knowingly positioning everyone

Originally posted by fireyaguns
The year 1907 by this site www.holmestead.ca..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Wow appears to have some connection to the affects of
aluminium to us.

As a footnote - aluminum is a twentieth century metal and Alzheimer's disease is a twentieth century fact. In 1907, Dr. Alois Alzheimer, a German
psychiatrist and neuropathologist, first described a new ailment now known as Alzheimer's Disease. Dr. Alzheimer's discovery occurred approximately
twenty years after aluminum was introduced and became a widely used product.

Yet they continued and to this day selling it knowingly positioning everyone

just like cancer sticks.

I have evidence that there aren't large amounts of aluminium being sprayed into the atmosphere. My evidence is the
Hydrangeas in my garden. They have two distinct colours: blue and pink. They are only
blue when the soil is rich in aluminium. Mine are always pink meaning low aluminium content.

It is much easier to change a hydrangea from pink to blue than it is from blue to pink. Changing a hydrangea from pink to blue entails adding
aluminum to the soil. Changing from blue to pink means subtracting aluminum from the soil or taking it out of reach of the hydrangea.

There are contrails above my property almost daily depending on the weather conditions and we get a lot of rain in this part of the UK. If these
contrails were in fact high in aluminium content then this would fall to the ground in the rain and subsequently absorb into the soil turning my
hydrangeas blue. This hasn't happened so I can only assume that the aluminium levels around here are low.

This, in my mind would pass as almost scientific evidence of there NOT being chemtrails containing aluminium. Where is your evidence that there is?

VICTORIA, British Columbia, Canada, April 21, 1999 (ENS) - As unmarked tanker-type aircraft continue spraying sky-obscuring chemtrails over
regions of the U.S. and Canada, this writer and American journalist Erminia Cassani have obtained laboratory tests of fully-documented samples of
aerial fallout. The samples were tested by a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) licensed facility. The two samples were taken from
aluminum-sided structures in separate states nearly a year apart after their respective owners went outside in the wake of low-flying aircraft to find
dwellings and outbuildings splattered with a brown, gel-like substance. Trained in the health sciences, Cassani carefully took samples from the second
incident which occurred at 2:00 pm on November 17, 1998. The samples were taken from property directly under the flight approach path to Thomasville
airport, an old airport once used for commercial flights but now used only for small planes. However, the woman whose house and property the sample
substance fell upon, observed that military aircraft have recently been using this airport for "test runs" circling the immediate area and returning
to the Thomasville airfield. This facility is located a 45 minutes drive from the Harrisburg International Airport in Pennsylvania. Noting nearby
military hangars filled with big helicopters, Cassani videotaped a house splattered on all sides, as well as the driveway. The reporter also
interviewed a man living near the main runway who claimed that a similar goo had hit his house the previous October. Cassani became ill with flu-like
symptoms and was sick for four days after obtaining the sample. When a marine biologist at a nearby university started working with the gel material,
he too immediately developed upper respiratory symptoms. The woman whose house had been struck also caught the"flu." Two weeks before Christmas 1998
she suffered a heart attack.

This is from one of your links. This is the kind of thing you claim as evidence. I wonder do you even read these things, or do you just blindly post
them hoping that the sheer volume of crap you link will dissuade anyone from looking into your claims?

A brown goo that causes you to get the flu immediately on contact? And sample collected from the area around a small airport? So the lines in the
sky at 30,000 feet somehow all collected around this small airport and made a few people sick? Come on, even the real low IQ folks will look at this
and wonder how you made the leap of logic. These are the type of things that make your fantasy remain a lunatic fringe theory. pathetic,

Nothing new, same old bad sampling, bad interpretation, suspicion, supposition, and general lack of understanding that the air and water always have
minerals, but the minerals still need to be linked to what is 35K+ over our heads, which they never are.

Perhaps you should go back through them and tell us why you believe they are proof.

The majority of one report, from Napa County, is by Rosalind Peterson, who has gone on the record as saying that through ten years of testing, there
is no proof of "chemtrails." Kind of throws that article under the bus.

I said this in the other thread, and you ignored it, but if you add up the aviation experience of just three of the "denier" crowd you will have
close to or over 100 years of experience. And yet not one of the three of us has seen anything that looks other than a persistent contrail in all
those years. Amazing that.

I drive a truck, and see every type of contrail ever pointed out as being a "chemtrail" and a few that haven't ever been mentioned on here, but yet
I haven't seen a single one that looked like anything but a contrail. I have to agree with others as to the question of "why haven't chemtrail
believers ever leased a plane to sample a trail?" The money has been there (less than $5K/hour for an air sampling plane, and $50k to make "What in
the world are they spraying?") I think that if that ever happens and anything is found your "deniers" will be some of the first to change their
minds.

Well then, since this has supposedly been happening since the mid 90's why is there no pictures of these spraying planes, and nobody seems to know
where they are flying from and exactly what they are spraying.

Guess your right same story and no evidence...typical chemtrail thread.

there are tonnes of photos and video showing this phenomena and tonnes of
direct eyewitnesses worldwide. is that what you consider no evidence?

a clandestine operation of this scale needs must be closely guarded and
denied at all costs.

all governments are now corporations and work according to the instructions
of their fananciers.

there are tonnes of photos and video showing this phenomena and tonnes of direct eyewitnesses worldwide. is that what you consider no
evidence?

It's not evidence unless the call of "chemtrail" is proven. I have not seen tons of photos, videos, or eyewitness accounts from anyone in the
aviation field or meteorology that say "those are 'chemtrails'". What is presented is people who usually prove they don't understand the
atmosphere or aviation making a proclamation about something miles away, using only their senses.

That is not evidence, it's not even anecdotal evidence, it's ignorance. All a photo or video prove is that someone was smart enough to use a camera
and the internet.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.