Goodreads

1850 words

I’ve read a lot of crazy things in my life, though this must be the craziest. Someone really believes that “blacks are less violent than whites“. To believe such a claim, you would have to close your eyes to all of the relevant data. From naming outright falsities to obscuring data to fit his narritive, this article will show and refute a distorted reality, one that the Left wishes to show, to one simply looking for the truth to interracial crime.

It’s just not fair. We white folks are so much better at race-based aggression than our darker complected brothers.

More intelligent than them, that’s why.

Just this Wednesday a white guy walked into a historic African American Church in South Carolina, was accepted as part of the service, stayed for about an hour before shouting a spiteful message and gunning down several parishioners!

Now that’s some hate right there!

One person does something and that means….what exactly? It shows one person is hateful! Look at averages, not singular events.

Whenever anyone brings up race and violence, the first thing people mention is crime.

Because they are linked to each other. Why wouldn’t the two things be mentioned in the same breath?

There is more black-on-black crime than white-on-black crime, they say. And they’re correct!

Yea they show that both would rather kill within race, however you miss something very important here: Interracial crime!

First, we find that during the 2012/2013 period, blacks committed an average of 560,600 violent crimes against whites, whereas whites committed only 99,403 such crimes against blacks. This means blacks were the attackers in 84.9 percent of the violent crimes involving blacks and whites. This figure is consistent with reports from 2008, the last year DOJ released similar statistics. Perhaps not coincidentally, that was the year Mr. Obama was elected president.

In terms of raw numbers, black people and white people actually commit about the same number of murders. But you wouldn’t know that from the media.

Not really. Per capita rates are more important than raw numbers, luckily we have data on that!

As of 2008, young black men kill at a rate of 7 times higher than white men.

The FBI is biased towards blacks and ‘hate crimes’. How about all of the countless times we here about blacks attacking whites using racial epithets during the attack? Too many to count. They are, however, not counted as hate crimes by the FBI because it doesn’t fit their narritive.

I wonder how those numbers would look if actual hate crimes were included in this data (black on white included).

According to the FBI statistics, 54.5 percent of the reported single-bias hate crimes that were racially motivated in 2013 targeted blacks. Only 16.3% target whites.

Want to talk bias? The amount of black on white hate crimes that are NOT categorized as such. This skews the statistics considerably.

Would our economy really have been so robust without the free labor of all those slaves?

Yes. Whites could have done it, but getting blacks to do it was cheaper and more efficient. Using brains to get ahead is what life is all about. Whites build great societies anywhere. Our economy would have been as robust as it is now without America never having a history of slavery.

He died due to asthma, obesity, and heart disease, that’s why he couldn’t breathe; he was 350 pounds. He also did not comply with the officers’ orders, which is why he needed to be taken down in such a fashion.

Yea, people still believe that Trayvon got killed for ‘wearing a hoody’. We have jurys for a reason. We have trials for a reason. We have laws like Stand Your Ground for a reason. Trayvon was killed because if Zimmerman hadn’t of protected his life, he would be dead. All of these people complaining about the verdict, if you were put into that same situation, would you allow yourself to be killed for fear of being called ‘racist’?

Because Dolezal is a moron. Blacks have the moral high ground? Please show me where this occurs.

Somehow they live in an American society that heaps hatred on their every move and they respond with dignity and perseverance.

There’s no reason at all for this right? Just good old fashioned ‘racism’?

So why are black people so nonviolent?

They aren’t. See the whole of sub-Saharan Africa to see how ‘non-violent’ they are.

Damned if I know! But I wish us white folks would take a lesson from them.

Yes!! The white man has tons to learn from the criminal black man! Much to learn about taking welfare and not working!!

Blacks have 2.5 to 4.9 percent higher testosterone than whites, which is causes more violence and crime. Beaver (2014) states that blacks who have the MAOA-L 2 repeat allele have significantly highier chances of being shot, stabbed or reporting shootings and stabbings than other genotypes. Blacks also have the highest rate of the 3 repeat allele (53 percent compared to 37 percent for whites) and 2 repeat allele (5 percent compared to .1 percent for whites). Moreover, he didn’t speak about how black violent crime is genetic in nature. This is mirrored in the crime rate and how violent blacks really are.

This is the age of the Internet where we have amassed tons of human knowledge which is readily available with a few hits of a few buttons. If people still want to be ignorant spewing falsities, it’s on them. But the truth is out there for those who seek it.

Blacks are not ‘non-violent’. Go to the nearest ghetto and see how ‘non-violent’ blacks are.

To refresh my memory… I went and looked up a response I got back when I made a similar claim about testosterone and aggression. I have since changed my claim and just state a differences in hormones could be the cause for differences in temperament and thus aggression between populations and don’t get specific about testosterone. I’m not that studious and haven’t really researched it much, I’m just providing the link for HBD refinement and to learn 🙂

The r and K selection theory explains this. K selected peoples are more intelligent and r selected less intelligent. They they have differing reproductive strategies, as well as differing ways of child rearing (r selected more kids less attention, K selected less kids more attention).

As shown in the link at the end of my article, those with higher testosterone are more likely to commit violent crimes as well as sex crimes than those with testosterone. The same holds true for men with higher and lower intelligence in the prison system and how many disciplinary infractions they get. It’s all predictable with testosterone levels.

I’m not that studious and haven’t really researched it much, I’m just providing the link for HBD refinement and to learn

I have some good information here. Check my blog roll too. This is very interesting research. I want to understand how and why we are the way we are. Evolution is a fascinating concept and I want to understand it more in regards to Homo Sapiens.

While this is an excellent debunking of an absurd posting, I suspect you were in a rush to write it and skipped the proofreading phase. PLEASE, don’t give idiots like this the opportunity to say “Ha, this guy can’t even use proper English so why should we listen to him?”. Yes, it’s an absurd logical fallacy, but it works. I would recommend taking some time to iron out the many little errors in spelling and grammar to make it more professional and thus more persuasive.

Thanks. Done. I thought I grabbed all of the errors. Always a favorite of mine when grammar and spelling mistakes get pointed out during discussion, because they’re meaningless. The data is what matters, as you know and that’s what I would say.

“Always a favorite of mine when grammar and spelling mistakes get pointed out during discussion, because they’re meaningless. The data is what matters, as you know and that’s what I would say.”

No.
If you like the times when our civilization was in its heyday, you have certainly noticed their worship of form, and how their writing was leagues above today’s.
Form and content are the two halves of meaning, and if there is something which mirrors the results of the last 100 or 150 dysgenic years is how the writing of scholars has changed.