If you own a reasonably modern car (say, within two or three years old), there's a significant chance that car has some kind of cellular connectivity embedded in it, and this allows the car to do stuff remotely. Like, start. Or unlock the doors. Or lock them. Or honk the horn. These things have names... like mbrace (Mercedes), AcuraLink, Enform (Lexus), OnStar (GM), MyLincoln, and so on.

Hyundai's version, BlueLink, isn't the most fully-featured of the bunch, to be honest. But, as one of the first and arguably most enthusiastic Android Auto partners, Hyundai's shown an interest in Android that few automakers have, as evidenced by the fact that BlueLink now has an app for Android Wear. The Wear app does what you'd expect - lock, unlock, remote start, stop, flash lights, honk horn, call roadside assistance, or dial BlueLink. Hyundai is the first auto manufacturer to officially embrace Android Wear, and it's not difficult to see why - a smartwatch makes a pretty ideal replacement for a lot of key fob functions, in theory. But can it actually replace one yet?

For now, the answer is no (not that Hyundai claims otherwise). Partly because you obviously still need the key fob to drive the car, and partly because the experience using Wear right now is just not there yet (also battery life duh). But it's exciting to see where Hyundai (and likely other automakers) will take this concept as it refines and hones the experience and adds features.

My first day experimenting with BlueLink, I decided I would get the car cooled off before I actually got inside. You don't get climate control options in BlueLink, but when you activate remote ignition, the AC or heater will kick on to get the cabin to a comfy 72F. I hit the remote start button on my G Watch R, and it said command sent. I walked out of my apartment and down the street to where I'd parked the silver 2015 Sonata Hyundai loaned us for this test, and lo and behold, the engine was running and the hazards were flashing (presumably to let passer-byes know the car was not going to just drive itself away or something).

So, how easy is it to send this command? Well, I think it's fair to say that it's not as easy as most of us would want it to be in an ideal world. First, you have to activate BlueLink on Wear. This means either tapping the face while the watch is awake and selecting "BlueLink" right below the red voice activation circle, or saying "OK, Google, start BlueLink." There is no way to voice-ignite your car in a single step. Once BlueLink launches, you can either tap the option you want or tap a microphone and say what you want. At that point, you then have to type in your PIN on a little number pad on your watch, which while not as difficult as you might think, does require your concerted focus.

Part of the problem here is Wear. Wear doesn't support custom voice commands yet, and Hyundai would, according to them, add such a thing if Wear allowed it (ie, "OK, Google - start my car"). This would greatly increase usability of the app, and I hope Wear does get support for this kind of thing soon. The next barrier to full touch-less car starting is the PIN entry. And no, carmakers probably don't want you blurting out a private 4-digit code that can be used in combination with an app to start your car, so that's probably out. But what about personalized voice authentication? Google Now has this technology embedded already, and if a rumored 'trusted voice' feature pans out, it's entirely possible Google will make this an API available to developers. But that's entirely speculative. Having to enter a 4-digit code if the rest of the process goes finger-free, though, probably would be manageable. Like I said, it's not as hard as you'd think. Though it could just go away entirely.

I realize it terrifies insurers, but storing an authenticator token on the watch that lets you skip the PIN would be worth any small risk that might present. After all, while I can understand losing your smartphone and thus wanting PIN entry on that end, you're unlikely to have both your watch and phone stolen, but not the car keys, and have a thief savvy enough to understand the watch can unlock the car without a code. A watch is usually pretty safe on your wrist, and the watch also doesn't even work without the phone, so it has secondary authentication already.

As for use cases, purposes for remote locking and unlocking are there, but obviously they're mostly backup measures. Let's say you're at dinner at a restaurant in an unfamiliar city and you parked your car way down the street on a block that could forgivingly be described as "up-and-coming." You get seated and immediately realize you don't remember if you locked your car. A few taps later on your watch, and within 10-30 seconds (depending on network speeds), your car will be locked, no matter how far away you actually are from it. This is assuming it has data signal - like most of these systems, Hyundai's BlueLink operates over cellular, so as long as you've got a 2G signal on the car, commands should be received. Unfortunately, the app doesn't let you know if the command was received. This seems like something that should change.

As to reliability, I personally had no problems getting BlueLink to work - just know that when you activate remote ignition, all other remote features are disabled until you then un-start the car (read: remote stop). So you can't turn on the car and then unlock the doors with the app, or even start the car if the doors are already unlocked. This kind of makes sense, though I'm not actually sure if the car can even be driven unless the physical key fob is within range, but I don't think it can.

Spending a bit of time with the service, though, I wasn't convinced I'd personally want to pay for it. And yes, Hyundai charges a subscription fee for BlueLink, with cost varying on the subscription type (almost all OEMs that have these systems do charge for service on them, by the way), but the cheapest way to do it would be $450 for a 3-year plan (which comes out around $12.50 a month). Sure, you can tack this kind of stuff onto your car payment, but it's still your money, and you still have to ask if it's worth it. If you're driving your car for a living (or live somewhere crazy hot / cold, which I don't), it may well be, but as someone who largely drives for leisure, I doubt I'd opt for it.

What would make it worth it for me? More information, obviously, and more options. How much gas do I have? What's my mileage like? What's the interior temperature of the car? Is the seat set to my saved configuration? Let me pre-input a navigation destination* (*you can do this in the main Android app, but not the Wear app), or set the climate controls, or operate a motorized trunk release. One day, I would even like my watch or phone to serve as proximity-aware substitutes for the key fob, because why not? Oh, and let me tell the car to do this stuff with my voice. Some of those things may not even be possible on Hyundai's current BlueLink platform, but other automakers are inching in that direction, and I hope Hyundai starts soon. Between Android Auto and an official Wear app, Hyundai is making some of the biggest strides toward a 'connected' car of any manufacturer right now, and they still have time to refine the experience and really get it down. I hope they do.

Comments

The average IQ is constantly dropping, just look at all the crazed selfie obsessed brain dead teens now a days.

BoFiS

woah, now I wish there was at least an OBDII app for Wear, I already have the Bluetooth dongle...

Theo

it is possible, with time , to have the ability to root and sideload on android auto. other than that there will be some app that is auto compatible in the near future... btw what app do you use with obd2?

jiri pavelec

torque

Kamolak

but why would like to have this kind of information on your wrist?

Vijay Lakshmanan

Next thing you know, they'll let you drive the thing with your watch. "Look Ma, no hands"!!

q

Its called a self-driving car.

Madis Otenurm

What about using a smartwatch instead of steering wheel? :D
Would be cool, not sure how accurate though.

There's no reason to block out a license plate in America, actually. There's a federal law all about this, but basically, unless you're in law enforcement, work for the DMV, or are a 911 operator, there's not much you can glean from a license plate number. And even if you do have those jobs, revealing someone's personal info this way is a criminal offense.

Given that the entire world can see it on the road, there's also just no practical reason to blur a license plate. This car is Hyundai's, though, so there's no concern to begin with.

I see. Well, I always assume safer is better. Maybe I just watch too many action movies...

Kamolak

I think car manufacturers should focus on use cases when car is not in the range of sight.

Remote lock, remote AC turn on, remote surroundings check (you want to check what is happening with your car through parking cameras - totally doable, probably illegal) those are the features that are worth extra hassle of going through additional interface.

Also better intergration with Google Now. You have a meeting, google alarms you how early you have to leave to get there and BlueLink alarms you that you probably want to turn your AC and also to leave additional 5 minutes earlier because you don't have enough gas to get to meeting.

The trunk thing would be nice as you walk out to your car sometimes, but I agree, there are good existing systems and it's from a make or break feature. Google Now integration, yeah, everyone wants it, but that's a headache and I think we're very far away from that kind of functionality (years) in cars just yet.

The camera surroundings check is an extremely good idea and I don't see why it'd be illegal, considering dash cams with remote viewers are perfectly legal as well.

metronome

wow! I thought 10 days battery on the Pebble Time was amazing, but 6 weeks is totally crazy?!

Apparently you only have to charge a handful of times for the entire year?!..

yankeesusa

Thanks for the great review. You made some great points. So far the starting and stopping the engine is the main reason i would use it as I lock my car almost instantly when I leave it and in florida getting the inside of the car during the summer to 72 would be perfect. I just don't think that right now the price is worth it. Like you said, if it allowed you to see the inside temp, check fluid levels or something similar, actually see if it's locked or on. Then it would be worth it. Another cool feature would be to tell you if someone is in the car after engine is off and several minutes have passed, it would help parents feel at ease. It's a good start though. Maybe Hyundai should give you free year of full service to try.

I would gladly accept a full year of evaluating a 2015 Sonata Limited, but for reasons that I think are understandable, they only gave it to me for a week, haha.

yankeesusa

I meant blue link service but i would take the car for a year also he he.

BioFanatic

Great review, thanks!
I didn't realize there was such a large cost associated with subscribing to these services. I don't think I'd be interested in paying $150 a year for these abilities, regardless of how great I think they are, when I can use my key fob for free.

Bozoman

I have a BMW i3 and use the iRemote App on my iPhone to precondition the car. 3 taps and it's done. The same App will be on the Apple Watch. Then it will be even easier as I don't have to take my smartphone out of my pocket. That's where the value of a wrist computer (aka smart watch) will come in. Reducing the use of the phone for simple limited functions like turn your lights off in your house, getting brief reminders or vetting incoming calls and messages. It will also prolong the battery life of my smart phone. The implementation of preconditioning a car described in this article is painful clunky and will not fly. Putting a 4 digit password in? Give me a break

You are able to get notified with Bluelink, if the car was successful in starting or unlocking. Just have to set the notifications on your account. Also missed features like locating your vehicle within a one mile radius, Navigation downloaded to the vehicle, and a slew of other features. Maybe you should have gotten the brochure for the BlueLink system to advise you of all the addtional features available.

1. This isn't in the app. So if it requires the web dashboard to activate, I wasn't informed. That's A.) kind of silly and B.) not something most people would know. Sorry I missed it, I guess? It should be on by default, regardless.

2. I didn't miss it, it's there, I just didn't mention it.

3. I see now that this is in the Android app, though this is not a part of Wear functionality, which is what is being evaluated here. Being able to input voice commands for an address into the watch would be a big plus, but it doesn't do it.

4. Chill out on the Hyundai fanboy parade. It's not like I slandered their service and reputation by neglecting to mention you can find your car via GPS using BlueLink for Just $12.50 A Month If You Pay Ahead.

I have a 2015 Veloster and use the Bluelink service on my phone. So far I am liking the service. My work day ends at 10pm so the remote start feature warming up and defrosting my car was sooo nice in winter. On the Bluelink website you can sign up for text alerts that you can set to advise if your Bluelink request was received or not. You can also send Bluelink requests to your car via the website.

Hi David, Thank you for the review. I have a brand new 2016 Hyundai Elantra with Blue Link on My Samsung Note 5 that works really well. I just bought a Moto 360 (Android Wear) smartwatch yesterday. The Moto 360 works well with my cell but for the life of me, I cannot figure out how to get the Blue Link app onto the watch. I have tried everything and even called Hyundai connect and no one could help me. Any chance you can tell me the trick of getting it on my watch? Like I said, It works on my phone and the watch is paired just fine with watch. I have the app Andriod Wear on my phone but it does not show the app anywhere. PLEASE HELP! Thanks