Podesta received a phishing email that warned him of someone trying to access his account. It instructed him to reset his password by following a
hyperlink to a fake google page , making it appear that he was visiting google.com

Before doing so, however, a Clinton staffer checked to see if the email was legitimate;... She got a response back from another staffer, Charles
Delavan, who wrote “This is a legitimate email. John needs to change his password immediately, and explicitly directed them to a real google
site....

Podesta then instead used the fake hyperlink inside the fishing email too change his password..

The only problem is there was a typo , and Delavan meant to call the email “illegitimate.”

If Trump colluded with Putin, that would have been treason, that would have been found out by US intelligence or US investigative journalists, he
would have not been POTUS and his family would have went bankrupt.

Trump is a multi billionaire who lives a more luxurious life than any other American, having his own 757 airliner and S-76 helicopter. Even if he is
not POTUS, he has a good enough life.

originally posted by: JeremySun
If Trump colluded with Putin, that would have been treason, that would have been found out by US intelligence or US investigative journalists, he
would have not been POTUS and his family would have went bankrupt.

Trump is a multi billionaire who lives a more luxurious life than any other American, having his own 757 airliner and S-76 helicopter. Even if he is
not POTUS, he has a good enough life.

He would have never done such a big risk.

Now that I agree with.
What the hell would he have to gain?

Why did he run??

1988:

"If it got soo bad... [I would do it] (run for president) "

"I wouldn't go in to lose"

"people are tired of seeing the country ripped off"

28 years ago he expressed a non interest in being president, but "if it got soo bad... "

He would, and he would only run if he thought he could win.

I could be wrong but I think I see his motive for this, and it has nothing to do with the russians.

4000 lawsuits? Fake news. Just like that fake news where he bought a 6 foot painting of himself using his foundation money. 25000 is pocket money for
Trump. He did not use foundation money for something 25000.

im not sure why anyone thinks they are conspiring. or what they are conspiring. doesnt a conspiracy connote malicious intent? but either way trumps
platform was no more foreign wars and more cooperation with the nations of the world. obviously russia likes him. whats there to conspire about?

im gonna bet no ones gonna answer me because i know none of you have thought that far ahead.

It's more than just a few but that's fine. I don't blame him for taking risks in business. That's what you do in business. You have to.

The problem is that he's taken risks so often and lost that now he just risks other investors money and not his. Now, while that may be fine in the
business world that isn't fine when he's risking the people of this nation.

The result will be the same if he loses. He gets out clean while everyone else pays for his mistakes. Then he claims victory and moves on. Again,
that's fine if the business world wants to work like that but it's not ok for a nations leader to act like that. We aren't just pawns in his game.
You should feel the same since everyone complaining about the last eight years or longer are all complaining about basically the same problem. Being
pawns in a game where they get f*cked no matter what happens. This will be the same. That is why we're being divided on purpose. That is why all of
this seems so crazy and engineered. We're being setup. All of us, including his supporters.

If he colluded with Putin, his whole family would have went bankrupt and he would have been locked up. He knew US intelligence and US investigative
journalists are highly capable and would have found out. It's not a risk he would have ever taken.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.