PER CURIAM: Demetrio Luis Sears appeals his conviction and sentence of eighteen years for attempted armed robbery. Sears argues the trial court should have instructed the jury that he had a right to arm himself if he reasonably believed that he was acting in self-defense. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Sears’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and ANDERSON and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.