On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:27:56PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 02:11 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >lvm2 is blocked by d-i right now. As I had to cheat already to not use
> >t-p-u, I don't consider this viable for Wheezy.
> Wouldn't it be possible to upload a new version to unstable, then
> after that upload 2.02.95-4.1 to t-p-u with just this patch?
No. This can only be introduced via unstable according to the effective
rules. And I already told you, I won't accept it.
> It's that if someone is using lvm2 on an Intel Matrix Raid array via
> mdadm, which is a working and supported configuration on wheezy, and
> for some reason one of the disks is kicked out of the array, LVM2
> /will/ detect lvm vg's and lv's on that disk/pv - creating chaos and
> very possibly data loss.
And?
Bastian
--
In the strict scientific sense we all feed on death -- even vegetarians.
-- Spock, "Wolf in the Fold", stardate 3615.4