The Conspiracy Chicks - Episode 0.1c - Deepwater Disaster

My opinion. The girls spoke poorly, they need to work on that a lot, I had to force myself to keep watching and not wander off to other activities.
You have to remember this is the internet, people have countless other options on things to watch and do at the click of a finger so keeping the
audience interested is important. On the same point, I felt it was too long and covered too much, maybe shorter episodes which could cover one topic
in a lot more depth. Like 1 whole show on the oil spill (god knows theres enough). That way you could decrease the length a little, or make the
content more interesting and deep. Also the girls need to interact, not just read things out, have it like a conversation, that helps keep peoples
interests.

Honestly, if you don't want to watch it, don't, if you do end up watching it, why are you criticizing anyone for anything? Is it your efforts that
have gone to waste in the production? No, you merely chose to watch it and then decided to post something negative.

So should we all just say it was flawless geius, simply because alot of dedication and effort went into it?

Credit where credits due- the girls and all those involved have done a great job to get it off the ground and have been brave enough to give it their
best shot! Now they will work to improve on what they have- criticism and feedback is the best way to begin to achieve this.

I think what many people are trying to do is be honest! They want to see it evolve and improve.

You can't pretend everything is ok just because somebody put alot of effort in to something, we're not talking about children here!

I am getting really slow play back on the video, seems to be buffering more than it's playing, is there a way to to download the video or stream it
through another media player for smoother playback?
Looks good though guys, congratulations. Being on camera is alot tougher than people think and you ladies seem comfortable there, which is 90% of
performing.

I don't like this video. It makes ATS look less credible and less professional in my opinion. It was also too long and rather boring. This girls
don't have enough characters in their voices to really grab anyones attention. I vote for these people to quit wasting their time making this videos
and instead make intelligent threads!

Hey Chicks! Job well done for your first outing! Like all have said before, you'll get the kinks out.

To the Mods or owners of ATS.

Why is this still on the number 1 slot on the front page? Are you manipulating things a bit? I have always thought that to be on the 1 spot, you had
to have X amount of hits and stars to keep you there?

Every post by Skeptic or any other of the 3 seems to stay there way longer than the rest. Is there a system in place or is everything posted
manipulated?

I have done some video production in my career, for corporate training films. I know that it is no easy task to keep the audience engaged, when you
have to compete with prime time shows and commercials that have huge budget. That said, the style of the video graphics are awesome. The photo's are
great. The background is appropriate. The concept is good.

A couple constructive criticisms are:

Change camera angle when changing subjects

Create Dialogue between the chicks; via split screen or other options like PIP

When the chicks need to read their script or swallow, it might be a good time for a transition point or break in the camera angle. I would
recommend shorter segments, or walking to digital image background to allow the chicks to breathe and swallow their spit.

When describing topics the chicks might consider demonstrating the topic by performing some act that makes the point. For instance, when describing
the junk shot with golf balls and tire parts I could see this being played out in comedy with a zany demonstration of how silly the idea is.

I am not sure who the audience is for these videos. If it is ATS, I think most will enjoy the topics. If it is for the public, then screen magic
needs to occur to hide the flaws of normal human traits such as reading from a paper, taking a breath, or swallowing.

i agree great job. good way to review important topics..and hot chicks and conspiracies, well that just melts my butter..is the show gonna be weekly?
bi-weekly? monthly? and im sure everyone who knows of this site knows of the show so can we please remove it from number 1 slot of hot topics? there
is only four slots and i like to check them out every couple of hours or so, and currently its just been a rotation of 3 slots..i know i know whats 1
slot, well whats one vote, whats one more grain of sand, whats one more drop of water in the ocean? nothing and everything..thanks

if i want mtv style news i would go to mtv. i dont need this jazzed up crap. cut the garbage and stick to the facts. stop marketing news to me i dont
need a pretty face to tell me the world is going to hell in a hand basket to make it less painful.

for one there not very good at delivery so its painful to watch them stumble through the text. please stop trying to make these people into mini
celebrities. we dont need that here at ats. stop selling out dammit.

Do I sense a small emphasis on "chicks"? Its not like you need to sell the news, as people will gobble up what ever "truths" they can get their
hands on. I find Johnny Anonymous to be just as attractive as a "chick" while offering the news.

The introduction looks more like an opening for comedy central, and not legitimate news. It would not be attractive to me, what so ever, had I not
known the source was AboveTopSecret.

Whats with the flowery background on the bottom of the "news ticker" or what ever its called, and the splashy like colors over all the back drops?
Gives me the feeling that nickelodeon is producing this.

Her accent is too strong, and I think I keep mistaking it for a minor lisp. She moves her hands frantically around the screen too much.

I liked the format for Johnny Anonymous, and with relevant news I would watch it if I accidentally came across it on youtube. I doubt I would watch
this.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.