>>21017exactlyif that guy thinks that Chloë is just another celebrity some people were worshiping and without which they would have moved on to a different celebrity, he's not getting why a lot of us love her

>>21026Seriously can't tell if you're just fucking around, but let's say you aren't., Im not sure what kind of barely logical logic are implementing here but the way I see it, if you like a celebrity, you're a fan of celebrity, chloe's not the only famous person I like, but I don't admire any other person enough to even have a though of making an imageboard dedicated to them cross my mind, and there was a time I didn't know about her, and guess what, there was no "chosen one" for me to obsess over at that time. So please would you kindly explain to me why would we be like this with some other person while we were perfectly fine when we didn't know about chloe which is practically same as if she weren't alive, as she pretty much weren't to us? Because right you come off like a moron.

Caution wall of text ahead:>>21024>Maybe you are not getting yourselfand who would be the expert on that topic? You?>>21013>People would obviously just be fan of someone elseI understand why you post as an ANON.No one who names up to accept some level of accountability for their "facts" would make a declaration of "truth" like yours on a site like this. What evidence do you have to back it up? Has there been a Chlomo.org poll of the audience that you're speaking too?It's not just about Chloë. It's her team too. I can honestly say I've never been this inspired by an actor in my life. Not even close! I've been focused on my success and RL heroes are more my speed. But Chloë and co are hardworking overachievers with the sunny disposition and positive attitude that I respect because behind those beautiful hazel eyes is a fierce competitor. Don't let her smile and giddiness confuse you. The clues are all there. Her intellectual capacity, determination and ability to convey varying emotions as an actress are advanced beyond her years. I like knowing that I have what many consider a grueling work schedule. "With great sacrifice comes great reward". She's in a markedly different profession than I am but here's a 16y/o and her brother who make long hours look fun. Make no mistake about it. They're working their asses off. Can you name any teenager in the public eye with her work ethic? A successful actor and coach can make all that work look easy. There are a lot of beautiful actresses but Chloë is making her mark at a young age. What makes it even more remarkable is that she's taking an independent path that isn't tied to a major studio like Disney. If you take a critical and comparative look I think you'll begin to understand the phenomenon that's taking place. Contrary to your implication— Chloë is NOT easily replaceable!

Oh. And in answer to the original question…. Life would go on. But maybe there'd be a few more clouds in the sky—so to speak.

I will admit that if something happens to divide her team I could see myself becoming less of a fan. But no actress would take her place.

But seriously, if Chloë never existed there are only 2 possibilities left:

Most likely you would be a fan of someone else with the same qualities (yes, they do exist. Noone is unique) - maybe you would all be fan of that girl who had played Kick-Ass instead (maybe Elle Fanning).

Or…

You would not be fan of anyone, which is unlikely, as something has already triggered your interest in Chloë, I see absolutely no reason for the same not happening with another person.

What is so hard to understand? Can you guys not even step out of your bubble and think there could be another - IF - Chloë never existed?

Then you are more blind than I thought. It is a hypothetical question by OP. It is not a trap to make fun of you thinking you are suddenly not great Chloë fans.

>>21035>If Chloë didn't exist that troll wouldn't exist. At least not on this site. But he/she/it would quickly find a replacement. Since no one is unique.>At least not on this site>this site>Chloë not existing>this siteOoooh, I was wrong. You ARE unique

>>21013>People would obviously just be fan of someone else>>21030>Most likely you would be a fan of someone else>Noone is unique>>21036> I was wrong. You ARE unique

Congratulations ANON. You seem to be making some forward progress. Exert a little more brain power and you just might figure out that Chloë is unique too.>You guys have not even understood the question from OPOne of the "guys" is the original poster. Do you seriously think he misunderstood his question?

>>21039>OP question is really simple. I could have said: If your girlfriend did not exist. What would your world be like. And you guys are like: "Uh durh, derp, then I would be alone and miserable. There is only one. Noone can replace her."

A pretty shitty comparison>No you would not. You would be with another girlfriend and she would be the most perfect and unique person in your world.

Presumption>It is simple logic.

Conjecture, not logic, conjecture is all you've done the whole thread, nothing you've said is logic or evidence.

>>21042>A pretty shitty comparisonNot really. It is actually pretty damn close with the one exception of Chloë not knowing about you>PresumptionStatistically fact. Welcome to the real world. Most people do not live alone forever.>Conjecture, not logic, conjecture is all you've done the whole thread, nothing you've said is logic or evidence.Evidence? What the hell are you on about? What do you want evidence for? OP's question is really simple.

Atleast I answered OP's question. All you others have done is trying to defend your bubble.

I do not even understand why you people entered this thread in the first place, if you can not even play along with the whole premise of OP's question?

>>21043>Not really. It is actually pretty damn close with the one exception of Chloë not knowing about you

The number of differences between fans is too broad for that comparison to be pretty damn close to anything>Statistically fact. Welcome to the real world. Most people do not live alone forever.

Only when applied to the general population and not to fans of Chloë, applying it to fans of Chloë is presumptuous. Lrn2Demographics>Evidence? What the hell are you on about? What do you want evidence for? OP's question is really simple.

Your opinion is not fact, stop stating it like it is.>Atleast I answered OP's question. All you others have done is trying to defend your bubble.

Everyone else answered the question too, just not in a ways that pleases you.>I do not even understand why you people entered this thread in the first place, if you can not even play along with the whole premise of OP's question?

Everyone did answer the question, just not to your liking, you self-centered fuck>Play along or GTFO and be a lemming fan in the numbered threads.

Good one, you're such a special little snowflake for having a different opinion to other people.

Delete Post [File] Password

Reason

This site is for a more mature audience

That doesn’t mean you have to be over 18 to post here, it just means that some of the jokes and language here might not be suitable to a more prude or young crowd.