ACRONYM’s Functional Intervention on the NIKE Air Force One

September 13, 2015

Take an Air Force One. Slice it in half. Bolt on a Zipper. Scribble on it with red marker. Put a foot in it. Repeat.

Since its inaugural line in 2002, Berlin-based ACRONYM has re-programmed menswear with a laser-focus on functionality. After collaborating in an urban stealth-ops re-launch of Nike’s ACG label, Acronym’s Errolson Hugh has now created an irreverent interpretation of one of the sneaker world’s holy icons. 032c’s Thom Bettridge spoke with Errolson Hugh about the design process behind the NikeLab Lunar Force 1 x Acronym.

THOM BETTRIDGE: Tell us about how this design came about.

ERROLSON HUGH: When we got the shoe, we looked at it and asked, “What can we do that no one else would do?” From there, we approached it the same way we approach anything else. We looked at it and asked what we could add to it that makes it aesthetically and functionally do something else. The idea for the zipper was fairly obvious. Once we had the idea, we got the shoes from Nike and literally cut into it with scissors. We bolted on the zipper, stuck our feet in it, and we were like, “This works.”

There’s something inherently aggressive about it. Here’s this iconic design, and your first gesture is to chop it in half.

There’s nothing subtle about it. You can immediately see the original design and the new parts that are stuck on. It’s an intervention It’s very unapologetic, and I think it was pretty ballsy of Nike to let us do it.

How did the idea for the dipping effect materialize?

We had seen a couple of shoes that were using this technique when we visited Nike for the first time. Once we had “hacked” the original shoe—cut it open and stuck the zipper on it—we were looking at it visually and thought that we needed something to balance it out, something that emphasizes the overall angularity of the shoe. So we got some red marker and colored in the shoe and looked at it. We thought, “That looks pretty good.”

The whole process seems pretty tactile. You’re given this thing, you rip it open, you draw on it…

We tend to work like that a lot. It’s raw and rough, but it allows us to iterate and try things out super fast. So you can be like, “Does this look cool? Can you wear it? Does it open?” You can’t do a lot of those things with a drawing. You need to try it on and put your foot in it to test it.

The classic Air Force One is all white, so the shoe itself is like a blank piece of paper.

We originally imagined our shoe with an off-white, light gray suede. But after a while, we realized that the white is better because it’s the original Air Force One color, so we just left it that way.

The Air Force One is a curious shoe because it transcended its own sports category. It was designed as a basketball shoe, but no one plays basketball in it anymore. It’s pure streetwear. As a designer focused on functionality, were you interested in resurrecting some of the shoe’s original function?

When you’re dealing with something from Nike, you’re dealing with a thing that is part of pop culture. It’s unavoidable. The Air Force One is one of the few cases where I’m comfortable using the word “icon.” I’m pretty sure it’s the first shoe Nike ever re-issued by public demand. Nike’s idea has always been to continually innovate and to continually re-invent, so they’ve created a Lunar version of it. The shoe is way lighter than a normal Air Force One. A basketball shoe is interesting to us from an Acronym perspective, because our design is based on movement that tends to derive from martial arts. Basketball is great for that because, like in martial arts, they use a lot of lateral cutting and pivoting.

Did you research the history of the Air Force One as part of your design process? How do you explain its mass appeal?

If people could distill that down to a thesis, there would be a lot more shoes like that! It’s one of those things. You get things that are originally intended to fill a functional purpose. For example, the MA-1 Bomber jacket was made for extremely specific conditions, and I’m sure to great expense the first time it was made. It was the height of research and development. I think it was the first jacket that was ever made in nylon and the synthetic insulation they were using. And then that jacket was released into the wild and—for whatever reason, because functionality is only part of it—it becomes interwoven with culture. I don’t know if you can pinpoint why that happens with certain items and not with others. It’s hard to imagine menswear without a bomber jacket. In the same way, it’s impossible to imagine sneaker culture without the Air Force One.

So what’s next for you in terms of shoe collaborations?

With Nike this is just the beginning. Ideally, when you do a collaboration, you do something that neither entity would come up with by themselves. I think the stuff we’re working on now is definitely like that. You wouldn’t get this from Nike, and definitely not from us. It’s a unique exploration.

You’re an independent label. What are the advantages of having an infrastructure such as Nike’s? What opportunities do you see in the economies of scale?

In terms of how they operate and their scale, Nike and Acronym are at two opposite ends of the spectrum. They’re arguably the largest brand in the world, and we’re one of the smallest. The way the processes are employed by both parties are so so different, but there are so many similarities in the end results and goals. The way we go about this is almost diametrically opposed in some cases. It’s been a learning process and a source of creative tension and sparks—in good and bad ways.

What do you think Nike is searching for with collaborations?

Nike is a massive company that almost behaves like a small company, because they’re actively seeking out things that make them uncomfortable. They’re looking to be challenged. They want to be pushed. They want to try things that are outside of their comfort zone. It’s pretty crazy because there’s a whole infrastructure put there to just do that. That’s not something you normally see in a company of that size. That’s why it’s exciting. Hopefully when this shoe comes out, some people will be surprised and some excited. And hopefully some people will be upset.

Related Content

How does one cut through the fog, particularly as an artist who’s built an aesthetic by sourcing from the past? Princess Nokia is unfazed, though. The pervasiveness of tech nostalgia propels her forward and stokes her imagination. Princess Nokia premieres her video for "Nokia" along with a profile by Matthew Grumbach.MoreNovember 11, 2014

“I am optimistic about the futures of some of the very youngest designers precisely because they are palpably pessimistic about the future at large.”

TROY PATTERSON on New York Fashion Week, covering “clothes designed for Doomsday, with survivalist vibes and Mad Max leisurewear,” Thom Browne’s Hitchcockian “uniforms for a conformist dystopia,” and a 71-person vocal ensemble called the Pyer Moss Tabernacle Drip Choir Drenched in the Blood.

Half a century before the latest protests at the Whitney Museum of Art, Faith Ringgold was there, in front of the museum alongside other activists demanding equitable representation of women and black artists in the institution’s exhibitions. As a painter she was influenced, as the European modernists she studied in college were, by the masks she saw while traveling in Africa in the 1970s. But she would never wear a mask herself. MoreSeptember 6, 2019

Apparently, a SpaceX Internet satellite almost hit a European spacecraft on Monday.

🛰🚀

“As companies and government agencies launch more spacecraft, concerns are growing about the likelihood of a ‘Kessler syndrome’ event: a cascading series of orbital collisions that may curtail human access to space for hundreds of years,” reports Business Insider.

HAVE LOGOS DILUTED LUXURY ?

“Scarcity is a fascinating phenomenon because it flies in the face of traditional economics and its supply-and-demand paradigm. And while scarcity has traditionally been the provenance of luxury, clever streetwear brands like Supreme and Palace have figured out that it can work at any price point. If you add scarcity to an already-hyped product, its desirability goes through the roof, and so does your reputation for being the coolest brand around. And if you keep the prices low enough to make it affordable in theory, you don’t alienate people.” Read more on Highsnobiety 👜💅

"Social media and society have something to do with the public square and having conversations and shared spaces. This project is a bit more running out into that space and shouting something out then running away. It's definitely a public statement, but there's no conversation really." Richard Turley and Lucas Mascatello on the possibility of intimacy in the New York-themed broadsheet CIVILIZATION. MoreSeptember 4, 2019

Why does the far right love Fred Perry?

“The transformation in aesthetics and style is part of a deliberate, top-down tactic on the part of the far right to appear more mainstream in order to make the public more receptive to their ideas. This shift normalises and disrupts the public’s ideas about what extremists look like and makes it harder to interpret and recognise the far right’s ideas as extreme.” Read more in THE GUARDIAN.

How Sustainability Became a Luxury Value:

“As soon as sustainability became something that consumers could dream of caring about—something rare and expensive—it ironically had more appeal. Fashion, as any truly modern designer knows, is as much about branding and marketing as it is about clothes. And as long as there’s an audience for fashion, any properly sustainable strategy will require making ethically designed and produced clothes that are cooler than anything else you can buy.”