"House minority leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), in an interview with Lesley Stahl of CBS News, said impeachment would be "off the table" if Democrats take over the House of Representatives in November, calling it a "waste of time."

She couldn't be more wrong, and most Americans know it.

While Pelosi was responding to a loaded question from Stahl, who couched impeachment in terms of Democrats' supposed desire to seek revenge if they retake Congress, Pelosi, who would become majority leader in a Democratic House, bought into Stahl's argument, saying that she'd be "satisfied" to see the president and vice president spending the remaining two years of their second term as "lame ducks."

What Stahl should have asked Pelosi was whether she thought that President Bush had violated the law and the Constitution, and whether she believed he has committed impeachable offenses.

The answer to that is clearly yes."

Investigate, impeach, incarcerate...Anything less and I'm gonna wonder about you.

By saying it is off the table, it might cause some people who are in that dreaded swing vote category to vote Democratic.People in favor of impeachment are not going to vote Republican because of her saying this, so I don't see any particular downside to such a statement unless it keeps people away from the polls, which my instinct tells me it will not.Then if the House goes Democratic all bets are off.

9. This is one case of elect us first, then we'll see if circumstances change

Remember, all it will take is ONE revelation that was previously unknown to bring the impeachment question to the fore. Also, with DINO's in the Democratic party, there may not be enough support for impeachment. This is a pragmatic call on her part and I tend to agree with her stance at this time!

Making impeachment with full investigations into 9-11, the Iraq war, the energy policy, war profiteering and lobbying scams the base of the Democratic party platform will energize the non voting masses to get off their non voting asses and take part in democracy for a change.

The Dems are not all activists who want impeachment - trust me - I can't even convince my liberal family members who do not keep up with the blogs that impeachment is necessary. Just because a narrow majority favor impeachment doesn't mean it's a good platform to run on - just the opposite IMHO.

Those who are on the fence and may have voted R in the past would be completely turned off by her saying "yes, we'll impeach". She'd make the Republican scare tactics true and make it appear as if the Repugs are right.

But to say it's off the table or whatever allows her the luxury of sitting back, watching the various investigations dig up irrefutable evidence of criminality and wrong-doing and then, with this evidence to back her up and the repugs in the impossible position of having to defend obvious criminal acts if they fight back against her, step up and say "unfortunately, with everything we've discovered, it's imperative that we put into motion now the machinery our Founding Fathers gave us to hold those in Power accountable for their misdeeds." With the American People now painfully aware of -- and angry about -- the evidence found, she'd be in a position of strength because it's OBVIOUS impeachment is the only answer. And she appears reluctant to do it.

Promising Impeachment now might wet the appetites of those rabid dog Dems who are frothing at the mouth for Justice, but it plays right into the Repugs hands and scares away those moderate republican fence-sitters who are worried about what's happening with "their Party" and are seriously flirting with the idea of voting for the D this time around.

After 20-something years on the Hill, she's a smart woman who knows how the Washington Machine works. Don't underestimate her.

21. She was completely correct. You can't impeach before you investigate

Of COURSE it's off the table. As it SHOULD be.

If you're serving dinner, you don't bring the dessert out with the soup course, and leave the ice cream next to the centerpiece to melt, do you? NO--you leave it OFF THE TABLE, in the freezer, ready to serve after everyone's finished their meat and taters, and commented on the quality of the meal.

I can never understand why some people fail to see the obvious. These things go in stages--you don't shoot first and ask questions later. You investigate, you find fault or not, and if you do find fault, you impeach.

And, not to belabor the PAINFULLY inflamed and obvious, if she'd said anything else, all she would have done is riled the GOP base and ensured a massive turnout for the cretinous R incumbents.

But who would want that? Who, in their right mind, would see Pelosi pounding the table and demanding the Monkey's head as a plus, a desired action, at this stage of the game??? Who would naively assume that this meant that she was "sufficiently left" as opposed to suicidal?

Certainly no one here who supports the Democratic agenda and understands how the game is played.

The challenge is getting the Senate in the D column; because what starts in the House ends in the Senate. I wouldn't be surprised if the House did nothing at all if they couldn't get the Senate onboard, so without a D Senate or a coalition of D's and a few GOP with a conscience (rare bird, that) there's nothing to be gained by initiating an investigation unless the Dems own the entire Hill. All it does is further divide, with no removal of criminals--a hollow result.

Articles of impeachment are introduced in the House..Republicans put up a hell of a fight..this dominates the news..In the meantime the new congress get nothing done and the REpukes play this up in the MSM..Pelosi is correct..There just isn't time and there are so many other issues to address that impeachment would get in the way.The voters are sending Democrats to congress to get some legislation passed and not to be stuck in the mud on the impeachment issue.

Everyone knows the country has been hijacked by a neoconservative cabal. How many more professors, journalists, diplomats, thinkers, and ex-military/politicos have to tell you this? The truth is smacking us in the face every day and, believe me, the people know.What we need, nay demand, is ACCOUNTABILITY! If the Democrats don't demand it, and shout it from the highest summits of this great nation, the people will see them as nothing more than the lesser (weaker) of two evils.

---- A wild-ass partisan crusade for impeachment could mess things up for 2008, eh? OF COURSE Bush should face legal accountability over several Constitutional offenses,...but it has to be done right. And just for the record, exactly how many democrats are currently calling for Bush to face charges? A democratic House could spend its entire first year simply seating QUIET investigations of administration transgressions,..and never mention impeachment. Patrick Fitzgerald has just given us a great lesson in how to handle these sorts of things, vis a vis "the press." Get all the evidence without holding a goddamned press conference everyday. I want to see it happen,... but I also like having a plan, instead of letting a host of competing egoes, AND the media control the process and sequence. Besides,.. there's a lot of other stuff that'll be going on, too. Stay calm.

questions from the house for two years is the only way to get to the bottom of this whole cluster of snakes. Plus dems need to be seen as governing well (because they do) rather than tearing down opponents.

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.