Features that Google Chrome should steal from other browsers

This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Google Chrome has been a colossal success. Although reports vary, Google’s browser now has between 19% and 34% of the desktop browser market. Thanks to Chrome’s meteoric rise, many derivative alternatives have been created, and they offer many interesting features and fundamental differences. A vanilla Chrome installation, even with extensions, just cannot mimic some of this functionality.

These alternatives range from Google’s own open-source Chromium Project to specialty browsers like the security-focused Comodo Dragon. There are too many to count, and there doesn’t seem to be an end to their creation. However, three Chrome derivatives are particularly of interest, and a number of their ideas are worth considering for the main branch.

First up is SRWare Iron. This browser is designed with user privacy in mind. Some of us are uncomfortable with the amount of data that Google can track when you install and use Chrome, and this is absolutely a solution for this. Features like search suggestions, installation tracking, and error reporting don’t even exist in SRWare Iron. While Chrome can be configured to be more privacy-focused, some options can’t be changed easily, if at all. While it’s in Google’s best interest to gather as much data about you as legally possible, it would very nice if the company offered a single toggle to turn off all tracking features.

In 2005, a browser called Flock came onto the scene. It launched using Mozilla’s Gecko rendering engine, and focused on the idea of social browsing. Later, it switched to WebKit, the same core rending engine used by Chrome (and Safari). It soon changed hands and was swiftly discontinued. Flock.com now cites the famous Twain quote “The rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated,” and features a newsletter signup field. Flock might not be around anymore, but it does have a spiritual successor.

RockMelt launched in 2010 for Mac OS X, and it continued the idea of a social web browser. It integrates both Facebook and Twitter into the interface with the intention of making it easier to share and discuss web content very easily. It’s still not available in a finished form, but you can sign to be notified of version 1.0’s release. Now, many social extensions are available in the Chrome Web Store. Cortex, for example, is extremely useful for sharing content on social networks. It’s worth having around, but it just doesn’t have the same utility that a true social browser does. While extensions are good at sharing, there isn’t much in the way of receiving updates from friends in a simple and easy way. Chrome could certainly take a page out of RockMelt’s book, and the social experience could be improved greatly for the end-user.

Finally, a little browser called Robin is worth noting. It started out with the name Raven, trademark concerns arose, and updates have been a bit spotty since then. The beta download link isn’t even working as of publication. That said, it does include a rather good idea that Google could take advantage of: A dock. Google introduced installable web apps in 2010, but there isn’t really a good way to launch and switch between them as you’re browsing. Robin solves this problem by having a dock permanently attached to the left-hand side of the browser. Not only is it easy to launch and switch web apps, but navigation is also baked right in. For example, launching the Tumblr web app allows you to easily switch between your dashboard and editor. If Google wants web apps to overtake traditional native apps, this would be a great step in that direction.

In sum, each of these Chrome derivatives might not be revolutionary by themselves, but they do offer up some great ideas ripe for the taking. If Google starts implementing some of these ideas, the gap between Chrome and its competition will undoubtedly widen even farther.

Google can add any features they believe will help market share…. or none.

And computer owners can install any browser they want, or several, and use the one they want to at the moment..

Opera works well for Facebook (and their games) – but I would not use it as a daily browser for everything else…

Firefox is in general a good browser, but where it lacks I use Opera or, within a tab, IE Tab v.2…

IE itself never gets used on my system, it’s never updated… it’s just minimally there so IE Tab can use the rendering engine inside Firefox.

Living with two browsers is pretty easy when one of them only has use for a site like Facebook… I always know where I will be surfing, or playing, so nothing about managing a second browser is tedious or difficult.

It’s not that I care about tracking in Chrome, but more that I don’t like the way addons are handled in Chrome… or the lack of addons I regularly use in Firefox…

For me, Chrome is just an also ran… still in Beta, like ALL of Google’s products.

It would be a slippery slope for Google to try to steal any features patented by another entity…

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1223563048 Angel Ham

Chrome is for everyday use
Firefox is for porn.

nikata che

I saw a lot of news about flock from the Internet but haven’t tried it yet.But it’s my first time to heard the other two browsers.I current use Avant browser, it also add a chrome engine in its ultimate version. But I like using chrome browser much more.In Avant,I just using firefox engine, which is more stable and fast.

Jollibee

Why are people so into Google Chrome. With the browser the most used application in every computer, and Chrome is popular and Chrome is integrated with Google products such as Gmail and other crap, then most users are compromised.

ChromIUM (http://www.chromium.org/Home) Ideal if you have too much time on your hands. Pretty much Chrome, but open source–download the source & build it yourself…

Matt

Disappointed in the suggestion for Iron. It’s well known in the community that the entire project is a money making scheme by the devs by spreading FUD about Chrome. There have been source code comparisons that show Iron has almost no change from the original Chromium source code.

It’s ironic that Iron is supposed to be privacy conscious and anti-Google, and yet, the Iron web site itself uses Google Analytics and Adsense. Notice how in Iron there’s a homepage set to iron-start.com? I wonder why. Oh right. Ad revenue. How about those bookmarks set by default to Iron related web sites? Ad revenue. Oh, and the links in Chromium that are supposed to go to the official Chrome extensions gallery? That’s removed too and set to another Srware web site. Why? Oh right, ad revenue.

Iron is an unnecessary and misleading product. This article should be about how to change Chrome settings to be more privacy conscious rather than to suggest a product that’s really out there to scam people with FUD for the ad revenue.