First, it is an important film and I encourage people to see it.It illustrates to a rather uninformed public several of the important issues including the budget crisis in schools and the importance of having quality teachers.

In October the film, “Waiting for Superman” dominated the television talk shows, forums, and press with a message that public schools are failing, the teachers’ unions are to blame, and that charter schools are the answer to the problems of public schools. Superman is not only a film about schools, it is also a part of a wider sophisticated assault on unions and particularly public sector unions. In the Fall 2010 election in CaliforniaMeg Whitman extended the criticism of the teachers union and made ita major issue in her $160 million dollar self financed campaign for Governor. The film and the Whitman campaign illustrate how corporate funding produces a political narrative.The corporations and the foundations involved are distinct, but the process of corporate or oligarchy funding to shape the political and economic dialogue are similar.

The film Waiting for Superman is a part of the effectivestrategy of corporate take over of education policy and corporate victories in framing the issues of education reform . Historian Diane Ravitch describes this corporate take over in her well written book, The Death and Life of the Great American School System; How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. (2010). There are several specific criticisms of thefacts and the framing in the film includingIra Shor of the City University of New York saying“Overall it benefits the hedge fund billionaires now bankrolling charter schools and conservative politicians,”on the site http://www.notwaitingforsuperman.org/

Prominent education historian Diane Ravitch, formerly an Under Secretary for Research in the Department of Education during the Reagan Administration, criticizes the film as propaganda citingsubstantial evidence that charter schools do not have a record of producing better achievement than public schools . ( NYReview of Books). ). [ full disclosure.This writer has long criticized Ravitch for her positions on multicultural education and particularly for her role in writing the CaliforniaHistory/Social Science Framework, the document that shapes whose history is taught in California school textbooks.] Ravitch argues that Supermanis a propaganda master piece blaming unions for the many problems of public schools including the budget crises andalleged problems recruiting and keeping quality teachers.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

1."Honest, we didn't do it!" Two years ago Wall Street's colossal greed crashed our economy. Our financial elites created and spewed highly leveraged toxic assets around the globe. These poisonous "innovations" pumped up the housing bubble and Wall Street grew insanely rich in the process. When it all burst, we learned that the big Wall Street institutions that had caused the crash were far too big to fail -- and too connected. High government officials came to their rescue with trillions in cash and guarantees -- underwritten, of course, by we taxpayers. Everyone knew this at the time. But if you asked just about anyone on "The Street" they denied all culpability and pointed the finger everywhere else: Fannie, Freddie, the Fed, the Community Reinvestment Act, tax deductions for home buying, bad regulations, not enough regulations, too many regulations, too much consumer debt, the rating agencies, the Chinese -- and on and on. Sadly, their blame-shifting strategy worked, bamboozling the media and people across the political spectrum. The GOP members of the Financial Crisis Commission are so drunk with this Kool-Aid that in their minority report, they refuse even to use the words "Wall Street" or "speculation" in assessing the causes of the crash. Hypocrites? Crooks? Morons? Take your pick.

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

This post is based upon an interview with veteran reporter and author William Greider. Social Security in Perspective, Part IIIA conversation with William Greiderby Trudy Lieberman in the Columbia Journalism review posted on Dec.21,3010. The interview with Grieder is about how the press miss report the condition and the so called “crisis” of social security. For this post I have taken Greider’s points and applied some of them to reporting on school reform. I am relying upon Greider’s extensive knowledge of economics reporting and applying some of the ideas to reporting on school reform where I see a parallel problem.

Why do many reporters not report on the realities of school change?

They too often rely upon the wisdom of selected “spokespersons” and other elites.

They have been sold a framework of a corporate view of accountability. Corporate sponsored networks and think tanks such as the the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, the Broad Foundation, the Bradley Foundation, the Pacific Research Institute, and the Olin Foundation provide “experts” prepared to give an opinion on short notice to meet a reporters deadline. Most reporters assume that these notables are telling the truth when in fact they are promoting a particular propaganda such as in the film “Waiting for Superman”. Who do they not speak with?- Experienced teachers, professionals with experience working to improve inner city schools for decades for equal opportunity.

The Obama Administration’s appointment of Arne Duncan was symptomatic of the problem. He represents the kind of corporate/media approach to reform. So, reporters can go to the corporate funded foundations and provide “balance” by asking the appointees of the government- they get the same story. In particular recently they have been turning to the Gates and Broad Foundations or the conservative Democrats for Education Reform.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Interesting U.S. news coverage of the trial ofRussian billionaire Mikhairl Khordorkovsky.He has been tried and convicted of corruption and the U.S. Department of State and U.S. press report this as evidence of the lack of a rule of law in Russia.

Well, that is half of the story.What they don’t say is that Khordorkovsky really was a crook.He stole at least $20 Billion from the Russian people.In 2006 he was the 16th. richest person in the world- based upon his looting of the Russian oil giant Yukos Oil which he acquired by market manipulation and theft.The resources were taken from the Russian people in the time of rapid transition to a market economy.

He was tried and found guilty of corruption and not paying taxes.

It is true that he was not the only robber baron who stole these resources.This is selective persecution.There are at least 10 major oligarchs and up to a hundred minor oligarchs, but Khodorkovsky was the boldest, most blatant, and became the richest.A nation with a troubled economy might not be able to take down an entire oligarchy.That would be like having banks too big to fail.

Why is it wrong to prosecute him?

Now, lets compare this to the U.S. corruption creating the financial crisis of 2007- 2009 when some $13 Trillion was looted from the U.S. economy by Wall Street financiers.The CEO’s of the major firms are walking free – some had to pay fines

Friday, December 24, 2010

The Sacramento Bee today has well written front page article on Democrats? for Education Reform.
Here is a preliminary response. Be certain to look at the more detailed description of Democrats? below by Michael Hirsch.

There is no evidence that the group has improved schools.Politicians have seldom improved schools.Improved schools require teachers working together.There is some evidence in my book, Choosing Democracy, and in the effort of QualityInvestment in Education Act schools sponsored by CTA.

A positive side of the effort of Democrats? For Educational Reform is that they point out, create a megaphone, to describe and criticize the failure of some of our schools, particularly urban schools.

Instead of talking about the most basic cause- the lack of adequate funding for schools and for school reform- they offer a series of ideas centered on the problem is the teachers unions.Well. No.The problem is the significant under funding of California schools as well developed in prior posts and in the suite Robles v. California.And, given the current state budget, the underfunding of schools is going to get much worse.

In the last two years the k-12 budget “solutions” have cut 4.6 billion dollars from the schools. We have larger classes and fewer teachers.School reform has stopped- except for the politicians hot air.School funding makes up a total of 30% of the state budget.Any crisis in the state budget and any cuts in the state budget will make school budgets worse.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Grad Nation: A Guidebook to Help Communities Tackle the Dropout Crisis - a resource that echoes many of the strategies NEA advocates - is available online from America’s Promise Alliance, one of NEA’s national dropout prevention partners.

The user-friendly guidebook is an excellent resource for NEA state and local affiliates that want to help communities develop tailored plans for keeping students on track to graduate from high school, prepared for college, work and life.

Grad Nation contains research-based guidance for addressing a community’s dropout crisis, links to additional online resources, and ready-to-print tools such as informational handouts to build support for community action, forms and tables to help organize and analyze local data, and charts to guide local decision making.

Arlen Castillo had just begun an online associate's degree program at Kaplan University when a family emergency forced a change of plans. Her mother in Florida learned she needed extensive surgery that entailed months of recuperation. Only two weeks into her first term, Castillo promptly withdrew to lend her mother support.

As Castillo recalls, a Kaplan academic advisor told her she could simply fill out a withdrawal form and incur no additional expenses beyond the registration fees she had already paid. But a year and a half later, in 2006, collections agents began hounding her, she says, demanding that she pay some $10,000 in supposedly overdue tuition charges. Despite having attended only two online sessions, Castillo had remained officially enrolled at Kaplan for nearly a year after her withdrawal.

Far from an aberration, Castillo's experience typifies the results of a practice known informally inside Kaplan as "guerilla registration": academic advisors have long enrolled students in classes they never take, without their consent and sometimes even after they have sought to withdraw from the university, in order to maximize the company's revenues, according to interviews with former employees.

Managers at Kaplan--the highly profitable educational arm of the Washington Post Co.-- have for years pressured academic advisors to use this method to boost enrollment numbers, the former employees said, offering accounts consistent with dozens of complaints filed by former students with the Florida Attorney General's Office and reviewed by The Huffington Post.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

History will record 2010 as the year Washington became “business friendly.”

Not that it was all that unfriendly before. Some would say the bailouts of Wall Street, AIG, GM, and Chysler were about as friendly as it can get. In addition, Washington gave windfalls to drug companies and health insurers in the new health bill, subsidies to energy companies in the stimulus package, and billions to domestic and military contractors.

But for corporate America it still wasn’t friendly enough. Before the midterm elections, Verizon CEO and Business Roundtable chair Ivan Seidenberg accused the President of creating a hostile environment for investment and job-creation. In the midterms, business leaders overwhelmingly threw their support to Republicans.

So the White House caved in on the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, and is telling CEOs it will be on their side from now on. As the President recently told a group of CEOs, the choice “is not between Democrats and Republicans. It’s between America and our competitors around the world. We can win the competition.”

Saturday, December 18, 2010

A news story in today's Bee recounts the budget balancing of the Natomas School District by teachers giving wage concessions.

How did we get into this fix? Well, first was the economic collapse caused by the bankers and the real estate fraud artists. That took 13 Trillion from the economy crashing the U.S. and the international economy. That produced a dramatic drop in sales tax and property taxes and a California economic crisis. School funding reveals the nature of crisis. In the last two years the k-12 budget “solutions” have cut 4.6 billion dollars from the schools. We have larger classes and fewer teachers. School reform has stopped- except for the politicians hot air. School funding makes up a total of 30% of the state budget. Any crisis in the state budget and any cuts in the state budget will make school budgets worse. The crisis will get worse.

California will need to raise taxes to fund the schools and to repair the social safety net. Anti tax radicals and Republicans oppose any tax increases.

Natomas was one of the early casualties. Many more will follow- even with the teachers giving up salary. The states and California are in a downward spiral and it will continue for at least 3-4 years. The children, and the working people are paying for the robbery of the financial classes. And, they just held up unemployment benefits until the Republicans gave them a $700 Billion tax benefits. See the prior posts on the financial crisis and the state budget crisis.

There’s a political action committee called Democrats for Education Reform. A great name, but I heard that they only support nonunion charter schools, bash unions and get subsidized by Wall Street hedge-fund managers. What’s up with that?

You heard right. They’re like other public school bashers, except they call themselves Democrats. Democrats for Education Reform claims that it “leads efforts to frame the fight that is playing out within the Democratic Party on education issues.” It tries to accomplish that by pushing aside teacher unions as education spokespeople or even as informed practitioners. The organization advocates for nonunion charter schools, vouchers, merit pay, test-based teacher evaluations, curbs on tenure and removing teacher unions from almost any role in shaping curriculum or determining working conditions.
In just three years, DFER directed more than $17 million into political and grassroots advocacy for its version of education reform and for what Joe Williams, the group’s executive director and a former Daily News education reporter, credits as “creating momentum which has the potential to dominate education policymaking for years to come.”

HistorianRavitch, formerly a prominent conservative critic of efforts toward multicultural school reform has now reversed many of her earlier positions and in particular criticizes the over use and abuse of testing and the development of for profit charter schools. Ravitch is currently a research Professor of Education at New York University, formerly a Fellow at the Hoover Institute, and an Assistant Secretary of Education under George H.W. Bush. It is interesting a welcome to have aprominent scholar reverse her earlier positions.She seems to have changed her positions because she continued to look at the data, and the test based reforms which she earlier promoted are not working out.And, she examines the specifics of testing limitations. There is no evidence in the book that she has reversed her earlier advocacy opposing pluralism and multicultural education.

The Death and Life of the Great American School System provides an important description of the media savvy campaign of the pro charter groups- such as Democrats for Education Reform, and the groups Ravitch calls the “Billionaires Boy’s Clubs” .This is one of the best chapters in the well written book.She describes how the Broad Foundation, the Gates and others have taken a leadership in criticizing schools.Their advocates clearly have the ear of Secretary of Education Duncan and Barack Obama.A central purpose of their work is to weaken teachers unions.A part of their effort is organized in the Democrats for Education Reform.

One of the points not developed by Ravitch is the ploy these groups use is that you are either for the charter based reforms and privatization, or you are for continuing public schools as they are – a deceptive premise at best.There are thousands of dedicated school reformers who have worked for decades to improve schools.And, we have improved some.We should continue to improve and reform schools.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

How to "fix things fast" in education: Support libraries and librariansSent to TIME Magazine, Dec 14, 2010TIME's report that the US "lags behind" countries like Finland and South Korea"on the PISA reading test ("In school, China on the rise," Dec 20), and TIME'spositive evaluation of the film Waiting for Superman (The Best Movies of 2010,Dec. 20), leads to the conclusion that there is something seriously wrong withAmerican education and that "we have to fix things fast." A closer look at thedata shows that what is wrong is our unacceptably high rate of child poverty.Poverty had a huge impact on American PISA reading test scores. Americanstudents in schools with less than 10% of students on free and reduced lunchaveraged 551, higher than the overall average of any of the 34 member countriesof the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). Those inschools with 10 to 25% of students qualifying for free and reduced lunchaveraged 527. Among the OECD countries, only Korea and Finland did better.In contrast, American students in schools with 75% of more of children inpoverty averaged 446, second to last among the 34 OECD countries.Our overall scores are less impressive because we have one of the highest ratesof child poverty among all the countries tested. According to a 2005 UNICEFreport, the US has a child poverty rate of over 21.9%; in contrast, the rate inhigh-scoring Finland is only 2.8%.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

On the third Wednesday of every month, the nine members of an elite Wall Street society gather in Midtown Manhattan.

The men share a common goal: to protect the interests of big banks in the vast market for derivatives, one of the most profitable — and controversial — fields in finance. They also share a common secret: The details of their meetings, even their identities, have been strictly confidential.

Drawn from giants like JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the bankers form a powerful committee that helps oversee trading in derivatives, instruments which, like insurance, are used to hedge risk.

In theory, this group exists to safeguard the integrity of the multitrillion-dollar market. In practice, it also defends the dominance of the big banks.

Thursday, December 09, 2010

In a significant win for supporters of equitable treatment of immigrants—and for smart startegies to assure that America's best-and-brightest young people have a chance to pursue higher education—the House voted 216-198 late Wednesday to pass theDevelopment, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act. Written to address the challenges faced by young people who arrived in the country without proper dicumentation but who have excelled in high school, the legislation extends conditional legal status for five years to students who were younger than 16 when they entered the country, have lived in the US for at least five years and have earned a degree from a US high school, or the equivalent.John Nichols in the Nation.

It is clear that the California budget is in crisis, and the issues were clarified in the budget summit sponsored by Governor elect Jerry Brown on Wednesday, December 7. There are no quick nor easy solutions. We can not simply cut our way out of the crisis, budget cuts and lay offs make the recession worse.

School funding reveals the nature of crisis. In the last two years the k-12 budget “solutions” have cut 4.6 billion dollars from the schools. We have larger classes and fewer teachers. School reform has stopped- except for the politicians hot air. School funding makes up a total of 30% of the state budget. Any crisis in the state budget and any cuts in the state budget will make school budgets worse.

California will need to raise taxes to fund the schools and to repair the social safety net. Anti tax radicals and Republicans oppose any tax increases. The state ‘solutions’ of the last three years depended upon receiving federal stimulus money. The stimulus monies are almost finished and with the Republican winning control of Congress there will probably not be more funds.

The California economy , if it were a country, would be the 8th. largest economy in the world. The California economy is larger than that of Brazil, Spain, Canada, India, Russia, Australia and most of the rest of the world. California can and should use Keynesian economic policies to find our way out of this economic crisis. We are, of course, a state integrated into a national economy, so the collapse of the U.S. economy will have a direct effect on our ability to use Keynesian stimulus to grow the economy. For description of Keynesian economics see here. http://www.newdeal20.org/2009/07/01/keynesian-economics-101-894/

Wednesday, December 08, 2010

The Sacramento Bee has an interesting news/ promotion piece about Michele Rhee and her new foundation. It is here. http://www.sacbee.com/2010/12/08/3241311/michelle-rhee-brings-her-fix-the.html

Yes, Michele Rhee is controversial. More important, while firing and evaluation changed, there really is no solid evidence that her approach improved schooling for kids in D.C. Please look at the data.

Just because Michele Rhee and her cohort make unfair and uninformed attacks on U.S. Schools, that does not mean that there are not serious problems in our schools.

I encourage you to read Diane Ravitch’s book, The Death and Life of the Great American School System; How Testing and Choice Are undermining education. (2010). She used to be on their side, until she looked closely at the evidence.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon, everybody. Before I answer a few questions, I just wanted to say a few words about the agreement we've reached on tax cuts.

My number one priority is to do what's right for the American people, for jobs, and for economic growth. I'm focused on making sure that tens of millions of hardworking Americans are not seeing their paychecks shrink on January 1st just because the folks here in Washington are busy trying to score political points.

And because of this agreement, middle-class Americans won't see their taxes go up on January 1st, which is what I promised -- a promise I made during the campaign, a promise I made as President.

Because of this agreement, 2 million Americans who lost their jobs and are looking for work will be able to pay their rent and put food on their table. And in exchange for a temporary extension of the high-income tax breaks -- not a permanent but a temporary extension -- a policy that I opposed but that Republicans are unwilling to budge on, this agreement preserves additional tax cuts for the middle class that I fought for and that Republicans opposed two years ago.

It was a hold up.The rich held us all hostage.In order to get the votes needed to extend unemployment benefits for the out of work and to keep the current tax rates for 95% of families, the Republican Party and 4 Democrats and Joe Lieberman blocked passage of reasonable bills for unemployment extensions and tax extensions.

The current deficit was caused by three major items, the Bush era tax cuts, the two wars,and the economic crisis.

Finance capital- that is to say rich people- caused the crisis, this recession and this unemployment. Now, they continue to insist on profiting from their heist.They insist on tax breaks for millionaires.

Monday, December 06, 2010

The tax extension forced by the Republicans will make the deficit problem worse. Republicans claim that they want to cut the deficits, but what they have done is increase the deficit to give millionaires a tax cut.

The two deficit commissions have begun a consideration of the growing national debt. It is important to notice what they have not considered. The Simpson-Bowles group actually proposed to cut taxes on the corporations while cutting benefits to social security and other programs.

There are alternatives. First, the Congress should restore the Clinton era tax levels on millionaires, the top 2% of the nation. Republicans have said no and have blocked unemployment benefits to force their way. It seems that the Obama Administration has given in. Note. The Democrats did not have the votes in the Senate to win. Losing elections has a cost.

The Economic Policy Institute has developed a balanced fair plan that does not tax the middle class while giving tax breaks to the rich. And they note, as most agree, social security is not in crisis. (http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/investing_in_americas_economy/)

Another alternative would be to establish a 2% sales tax on stocks, bonds, and securities. You and I pay 8% sales tax in the county while the “dealers” on Wall Street pay no sales tax. Such a tax would quickly reverse our debt problem. It would tax the very people who created the financial crisis

Friday, December 03, 2010

Senate Republicans and a handful of Democrats Saturday defeated a bill to reauthorize unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless and a plethora of tax provisions for the middle class not because of the bill's trillion-dollar deficit impact, but because it did not include tax cuts for the rich.

Two bills were defeated. By a vote of 53-36, the Senate rejected a measure by Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) that would have preserved Bush era tax cuts for lower- and middle-income taxpayers, but would have allowed cuts for people earning more than $200,000 a year to expire. Democrats Joe Manchin (W.Va.), Ben Nelson (Neb.), Jim Webb (Va.), Russ Feingold (Wisc.) and Independent Democrat Joe Lieberman (Conn.) joined Republicans in voting nay.

Today's Sacramento Bee editorial calls for an infusion of new leadership to keep Natomas Unified from failing. As described yesterday in the post below - Natomas is not failing. It is under funded as are almost all schools districts in the state. The Bee editorial board calls for "civic leaders" to let Natomas Unified teaches know that they should settle and take a 7.9 % pay cut to balance the budget.
However, California school budgets are all in crisis and they will continue in crisis for several years as a consequence of the economic collapse of the housing market and the financial heist of Wall Street. ( See "the Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One" in the archives of this blog.)
I would like to see the "civic leaders", including the Bee editorial board insist that the state adequately fund our schools. Poll after poll show that the tax payers want their schools adequately funded, but the legislature has refused, and has been unable to fund the schools in this crisis. The Robles-Wong suite against California on school funding makes these points well.
This kind of crisis will engulf more and more school districts. Those unwilling to take on the corporate elite- like the Sacramento Bee editorial board- will continue to call for the teaches to take the pay cut. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission chaired by Phil Angelides will soon make their report showing who really caused the crisis and who profited from the economic crisis. The Bee calls for new leadership but does not call upon the financial insiders to be held accountable and to pay for the crisis they have created. The students will have a reduced education and the Bee will castigate the teachers. That is our future for the next few years.

Thursday, December 02, 2010

The headline in the Sacramento Bee today says, “School district is going broke,” Dec.2,2010. P. B1. The article by Diana Lambert.

The article, and the headlines, miss the major points, create a distorted frame for the story, and assign blame for the wrong problem.

The issue is that the Natomas schools have cut their budgets by $31.2 million, and now, due to the failure of the legislature to adequately fund the schools, they must cut even more. Natomas is not a troubled school district. Like all districts it must respond to the draconian cuts imposed from the state.

The new superintendent and the school board wants the teachers to take a bigger pay cut. That is, they insist that teachers take pay cuts to respond to the failure of the legislature to adequately fund the schools. The Bee regularly argues that teachers should take these cuts.

These cuts hurt children. Already the district has raised its class size from 20 to 25 in k-3. This means that some children will not learn to read and some will not learn math. It is difficult to make these cuts since they damage the quality of education.