Jovocop wrote:$4.2m for a depth that might never play another game is too much. As bad as Komisarek is, at the very least, he should be an upgrade over Alberts. Also, he is a RH defenseman that this team sorely needs. As long as Alberts is not on ice every game from now til the trading deadline, I would not mind taking Komisarek for Ballard now.

vs. Komisarek at $4.5? With a NMC? At least we can move/dump Ballard wherever we want. We take on Komi and we're stuck with him. Saving 900K dumping him in the minors isn't even an option. ADDING salary to our bottom pairing with a guy that will probably be bought out this summer? No thank you.

I'd rather dump Ballard for a draft pick than take on a worse contract that still might not play...

This is quoted from TSN's article about Komisarek:

The 31-year-old, who has no points in four games for Toronto this season, has a modified no-trade clause. He is in the fourth season of a five-year, $22.5 million contract, with an annual cap hit of $4.5 million.

I am not so sure about what it means by "modified". Anyhow, Komisarek could not crack the Leafs' top-six might not mean that he would not crack the Canucks' top-six. He does fill a need for the Canucks, a RH defenseman. Also, he could be the crease clearing defenseman that the Canucks need. I don't see much difference in terms of caps. It is slightly higher this year but it is also one year shorter than Ballard's contract. At the end of the day, it is not a good asset management to have a $4.2m defenseman sitting while playing two fringe defensemen instead. Ballard's trade value is not going to increase while sitting in the press box. The sooner the problem is addressed, the better it is for everyone.

Lancer wrote:Even so, I'm in the 'Ballard looked better on a crappy team' camp. I give Ballard credit in that he did play pretty good the first couple of games... just like Kassian... I wonder if it's a trend where certain players in the league (either by playing during the lockout or some kind of lockout training regimen) got a head start against the competition but the market is correcting itself - guys who looked good early on are not so noticeable in a good way anymore.

what does Kassian have to do with Ballard ? Ballard, Kassian, Booth and Schroeder have now been sandbagged by the fat frog......is that what they have in common ? But hey Alberts and Lappy will thrive

Jovocop wrote:$4.2m for a depth that might never play another game is too much. As bad as Komisarek is, at the very least, he should be an upgrade over Alberts. Also, he is a RH defenseman that this team sorely needs. As long as Alberts is not on ice every game from now til the trading deadline, I would not mind taking Komisarek for Ballard now.

Komisarek is fucking brutal. Garbage player who can't play in the Leafs lineup but he will play here ??? Right.

"Balltard" has been mismanaged since he got here and that is on AV. Doh I said " Balltard " on a message board.Tee hee Mrs Grundy . As for anyone wanting Komisarek or questioning why we didn't get Kadri or Van Reimsdyk .... I swear these people need to chip the feces off their domes with an air chisel , remove their heads from their colons and come up for some fucking air.

Exactly, what kind of return are the Canucks going to get for Ballard? Crosby? Weber? Nobody will give the Canucks a decent return for Ballard. I know that Komisarek sucks on the Leafs but as I said it fills a need for the Canucks. It is still better than having a $4.2m defenseman in the press box with his trading value going down further every game.

I don't give a shit if anyone wants to give a decent return for Ballard or not. A 7th round pick or a 1.5 million dollar slug is better value than Komisarek. He fucking sucks !!!! I don't care if he is rh or not the guy can't skate, he has zero offence to his game, he is a punching bag and makes the same money as " Balltard " I said it again. where's the drum roll ?

Topper wrote:I have long suspected there is something with Ballard toeing the party line or practice work ethic that puts him in AV's doghouse. Recall his first season when he was scratched. The team statement was he wasn't healthy and a couple of days later Ballard says he's been a healthy scratch.

That and that....

Further, he was mostly terrible for 2 years and really not all that great this year.

Sure he has been fine in 3rd pairing min, but for those who remember Eherhoff looked like Paul Coffey a few years back when he was playing on the 3rd pairing.

Ballard is simply a massively over paid player, who's a few months from a buy out. The trade was a dud but the bigger problem is that GMMG did not seem to push for a trade after his first year when it was clear Ballard wasn't going to work out.

I think we would be better off right now with Aaron Rome, especially given Rome can play both sides.

Topper wrote:I have long suspected there is something with Ballard toeing the party line or practice work ethic that puts him in AV's doghouse. Recall his first season when he was scratched. The team statement was he wasn't healthy and a couple of days later Ballard says he's been a healthy scratch.

That and that....

Further, he was mostly terrible for 2 years and really not all that great this year.

Sure he has been fine in 3rd pairing min, but for those who remember Eherhoff looked like Paul Coffey a few years back when he was playing on the 3rd pairing.

Ballard is simply a massively over paid player, who's a few months from a buy out. The trade was a dud but the bigger problem is that GMMG did not seem to push for a trade after his first year when it was clear Ballard wasn't going to work out.

I think we would be better off right now with Aaron Rome, especially given Rome can play both sides.

I don't disagree he is overpaid. However he has also been completely mismanaged as an asset and he is clearly a better player than Barker or Alberts. Other than one season is Phoenix he has not been a big PP producer , but he has always put up around 25- 30 ES points. Those are great numbers and the dude can skate like the wind..... easily the best skater of this teams d -men. I remember watching him play with the Yotes and i quite liked him.

It's a round hole - square peg thing.Very few d men are allowed to carry the puck in AV's system. AV isn't going to play the guy. My point is why completely shitcan the asset. As I said it's like kicking in gold or puke colored shag carpet over top of hardwood. Play the guy, jack up his value and trade him. See Hodgson- Cody.

The argument isn't whether he's overpaid or whether he has trade value - the issue is that he's a $4.2 million asset sitting in the press box. Trade him for a bag of pucks and you'd be better off, at least then you can use the cap space to eat a contact in a Lu deal, or trade Raymond for a more expensive winger, or add a center - many possibilities.

A guy who is eating that much cap and producing a shitty return makes no sense. At least a guy like Booth is driving play and getting lots of chances while he's on the ice even if he's snake bitten, Ballard is completely useless right now. There are lots of teams that need D especially if you eat some of his cap hit, surely he has some value around the league and if not, trade him for nothing so you can add somebody who will actually contribute.

Guess we'll see tomorrow if he's playing or not - if he's a healthy scratch for a 3rd game might as well get somebody here who AV and co will actually play.

Lancer wrote:Even so, I'm in the 'Ballard looked better on a crappy team' camp. I give Ballard credit in that he did play pretty good the first couple of games... just like Kassian... I wonder if it's a trend where certain players in the league (either by playing during the lockout or some kind of lockout training regimen) got a head start against the competition but the market is correcting itself - guys who looked good early on are not so noticeable in a good way anymore.

what does Kassian have to do with Ballard ? Ballard, Kassian, Booth and Schroeder have now been sandbagged by the fat frog......is that what they have in common ? But hey Alberts and Lappy will thrive

All I'm saying is Ballard looked good early on, but so did a lot of other people in the league - people who aren't doing so hot now that the rest of the players have caught up to speed. AV or no, Ballard wasn't great the last two games.

Hockey Widow wrote:OK, so I'm starting a new thread. Why? Because I just don't get it.

Apparently it is true, Ballard has been a healthy scratch the last two games. I for one would like to know why.

He has been one of the more consistent D'men this season. He gets punished because he can't play the R side while others get a pass. He gets benched and Alberts gets to keep playing. He sits with Barker gets the call.

Ok, Ok, Ok, so we want to see what Barker can bring, fine. We know what Alberts brings and yes he needs to play. But why bench Ballard? And why for 2 straight games. When he fucks up he sits for games on end but others get a pass. AV has mis managed Ballard from day one.

I'm still sore we go into game 7 of the finals with Ehrhoff barely able to lift his shoulder, can't hit and can't shoot, Edler with 2 broken fingers, can barely hold stick and can't shoot. Yet no Ballard. Not even as a forward where we had Glass playing with broken ribs, could barely skate or hit. Yet games 7 we sit a healthy D'man for some reason. Oh and lets not talk about one eye Manny drawing in over Hodgson and Ballard.

I get that Ballard is over paid to be on the bottom pairing. I get we have too many D'men making over 4 million + and all playing the left side, or playing there better. I get one will in all likelihood have to be moved. OK, fine, then move one of them. I don't get how or why he has been handled this way by the Canucks. I have no great love for the guy I just think he is better than Alberts and Barker at this point. I get that the defence is running around a lot but how do you lay the balm on one guy. Sit Edler a game or two for his brain farts. Sit garrison for a game or two for his brain farts.

Apparently Ballard's agent plans to talk to the Canucks this week. I guess Keith has had enough too. So trade him already MG. Even if all you get is a low round draft pick get his cap off the books.

I sense your concern as well H.W. I have finally committed myself to realize that a coaching change is on the verge of necessity with regards to our team. I feel unfortunately that other teams can now prepare for us predictably. This is due to a mentally lazy coaching style. A.V. has never been a coach, in my opinion, that can mix things up properly. Sure he will mix up lines but it seems to only result in some confusion to our own players. He has constantly rode on the two top lines, our pricey defense and two first class goaltenders. This is just unacceptable. He must go. He seems to want to nurture francophones and defence first types but cmon, one needs to grow out of the box.