Problems on carbon dating blogs on dating a married man

More importantly, the data are obviously threatening to some old-earth scientists, as the talk has actually been removed from the meeting’s official program!

According to this source: Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning. After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings.

This was the session that contained the presentation.

Notice that the presentation numbers go from “4” to “6,” skipping “5,” which was the presentation on carbon-14 in dinosaur bones.

However, I thought the most striking argument he made against the contamination explanation was his last.

He showed a graph that ordered the samples according to their amount of carbon-14, and he showed that they naturally separate into four distinct groups.

The plants were all in the group that had the lowest level of carbon-14, while the dinosaurs and megafauna formed three other groups. They for a discord between carbon-14 dating and old-earth thinking, but they are by no means conclusive.

This kind of structure would not be expected in data that come from contamination. Even combined with the previous studies, for example, the specimens represent only a small fraction of what is available to measure.

Of course, one possible explanation for these results is contamination.