The Awareness Center closed. We operated from April 30, 1999 - April 30, 2014. This site is being provided for educational & historical purposes.
We were the international Jewish Coalition Against Sexual Abuse/Assault (JCASA); and were dedicated to ending sexual violence in Jewish communities globally. We did our best to operate as the make a wish foundation for Jewish survivors of sex crimes. In the past we offered a clearinghouse of information, resources, support and advocacy.

In September, 1996 Stuart Friedman was arrested performing sexual and sadomasochistic acts. He was convicted and sentenced to federal prison. Friedman currently resides in the orthodox community of Baltimore. He davens at Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer's shul along with several other known sexual predators living within the eruv of Baltimore.

Cantor
Stuart Friedman, who is currently on the National Sex Offender registry rents his
apartment from Devorah Shore, who is the daughter of alleged sex offender, Rabbi Moshe Eisemann. Mrs. Schor also owns a small Jewish magazine called "Where, What, When".It
is also important to be aware that Friedman's next door neighbor are
the parents of convicted sex offender, Shmuel Juravel, who plead guilty
to three counts of traveling to have sex with a child and use of the
Internet to entice a child to engage in illegal sex acts.If you or anyone you know were sexually victimized by Stuart Friedman and are looking for resources, please feel free to contact The Awareness Center and or your local rape crisis center.

August, 1994. Cantor Stuart Friedman was hired by Beth Israel Synagogue in Halifax, NS, Canada. His previous positions include synagogues in Cleveland, OH, and Detroit, MD. Mr. Friedman, holder of a music degree from an American universityJuly 18, 1996. Cantor Stuart Friedman chatted on line from his home computer in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, with an undercover FBI agent who was located in Long Beach, CA.September, 1996. Cantor Friedman was arrested after he sent 29 pornographic photos of children over the Internet to an unidentified source in the United States. The photographs included children performing sexual and sadomasochistic acts.Authorities said Cantor Friedman, was originally arrested after a lengthy Canada-U.S. investigation into a child porn ring on the Internet. The Canadian police seized up to 300 still photos involving nudity and sex acts involving children as young as eight. They also confiscated dozens of computer disks and videotapes containing child porn, as well as magazines with titles such as First Hand and Boys.January 6, 1997. Cantor Stuart David Friedman pled guilty to possessing child pornography in Halifax, Nova Scotia. He was fined $2,000 and a $200 victim surcharge and was then allowed to leave the country immediately for the United States.August 13, 1998 Cantor Stuart Friedman was arrested by the FBI in Baltimore, MD and flown to Los Angles, CA. He faced a maximum sentence of a $380,000 fine and 15 years in prison. His attorney, Marcia Brewer, succeeded in reducing the level of punishment to 15 months in prison and three years' probation. She also persuaded the judge to remove the requirement that Friedman must disclose his child-pornography conviction to parents of anyone younger than 18 with whom he has contact. Instead, Friedman is ordered to just notify his employer. Judge Moreno said he took into account the pictures were not of boys younger than 12 and did not depict sadism. Yet sources do not say if any of the boys over 12 depicted sadism.May 9, 2000. Cantor Stuart Friedman was released from federal prison and relocated to the orthodox community of Baltimore, residing at 3809 Clarks Lane.2004. Cantor Stuart Friedman was non-compliant with the Maryland Sex Offender Registry for over a year, yet is now compliant.2008. Stuart Friedman currently prays Shearith Yisrael (commonly known as the Glen Ave. Shul), which is directed by Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer. He is listed as living in an apartment owned by one of the daughters of alleged sex offender, Rabbi Moshe Eisemann. His apartment also is next door to the childhood home of convicted sex offender, Shmuel Zev Juravel.2009. Baltimore Examiner writes article about Call To Action.

Jewish cantor caught with child pornCanadian Press Newswire - January 7, 1997(Please Note: the journalist used an alternative spelling of the name Stuart)A Jewish cleric who led prayers and song at his synagogue and gave Hebrew lessons to children pleaded guilty Tuesday to possessing child pornography.Stewart Friedman, a U.S. citizen who has lived in Halifax for two years, covered his face with the collar of his trenchcoat as he was led into court.He was fined $2,000 for possessing child porn and allowed to leave the country immediately for the United States. Authorities said Friedman, a cantor at Beth Israel Synagogue, was arrested after a lengthy Canada-U.S. investigation into a child porn ring on the Internet.Police raided Friedman's south-end apartment Monday and found him seated at his computer terminal.They seized up to 300 still photos involving nudity and sex acts involving children as young as eight.They also confiscated dozens of computer disks and videotapes containing child porn, as well as magazines with titles such as First Hand and Boys. They also seized two computer terminals - one equipped with a camera for scanning photos and sending them over the Internet.''They were extremely sickening,'' Const. Gary Martin, a Halifax police spokesman, said of the material. ''That's why a legal society can't tolerate that.''Police also seized a book in Friedman's apartment detailing how parents can street-proof their children.Friedman, who isn't married, arrived in Halifax in August 1994 to be Beth Israel's cantor, a Jewish cleric who leads worshippers in song and prayer. He also gave religious instruction to children in the synagogue.The Crown and police said they were satisfied Friedman wasn't physically involved with children in the synagogue or in the material seized.''There is absolutely no evidence that he in any way put his personal feelings over his professional responsibility or in any way did anything to any child,'' said Joel Pink, Friedman's lawyer.Friedman, bearded and wearing a yarmulke, stared at the floor for most of his court appearance. He did not speak.After paying his fine, he was whisked out a side door in the courthouse and into a waiting car.Pink told reporters Friedman left Canada voluntarily and wasn't ordered out. He was to board a flight to Boston early Tuesday night.Friedman's home town wasn't revealed, but it's known he last lived in Philadelphia.Beth Israel officials couldn't be reached for comment.A charge of possessing child porn carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, but both the Crown and defence asked for only a $2,000 fine.Crown lawyer Frank Hoskins rejected a suggestion that Friedman received a light sentence because of his standing in the community.''I don't think he got off easy at all,'' he said. ''I think it was a fair, fit and proper punishment.''It was one that struck a just proportion between the circumstances surrounding the possession and the circumstance surrounding the offender.''The court was told Friedman became a suspect in September after he sent 29 graphic photos by Internet to an unidentified source in the United States.Despite that, Hoskins said police didn't have reasonable grounds to believe Friedman was distributing child porn.Sgt. Bill Cowper, an Internet crime expert with Halifax police, said an investigation into the child porn ring was continuing involving police in both Canada and the U.S.He said more charges were likely.

Cantor fined for child porn - Arrest shock synagogue; Teacher flies back to U.S.by Eva Hoare and Amy Pugsley FraserThe Halifax Herald - Wednesday, January 8 1997A Hebrew school teacher and cantor at a Halifax synagogue, who downloaded hundreds of pornographic photographs of children from the Internet, was fined $2,200 in court Tuesday.The fine was paid and Stuart David Friedman, a well-liked and respected member of the Beth Israel Synagogue, promptly left the country for his native United States.It's the first charge of its kind in Nova Scotia and justice officials hinted that Mr. Friedman's activities - downloading a personal fantasy collection of boys performing sexual and sadomasochistic acts - could be connected to an international child pornography ring.Mr. Friedman, 42, of South Park Street, Halifax, pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography from the Internet. When Canada Customs and police officers arrested him during a raid on his apartment Monday, the cantor was surfing the Net.Although his private cache contained photographs and videos - as well as gay and bondage magazines - the bulk of his collection was 223 computer-generated photos of child pornography stored on diskettes, on two computer hard drives, and on computer printouts."It's extremely disgusting", said Const. Gary Martin of the Halifax Regional Police Service, whose officers also conducted a search of Chebucto Freenet offices, Mr. Friedman's Internet provider. "Ninety per cent of this material was obtained either directly or indirectly through the Internet. Some ... was directly downloaded from the Internet and some ... was obtained from different groups that are within the Internet", Const. Martin said."The pictures are very explicit. It covers just about every avenue of pornography that's out there."Canada Customs' intelligence division started working the case last September and then brought in regional police, said Ed Osborne, customs' regional intelligence officer.Now officers - who'll spend hundreds of hours poring over the materials - want to know if any Nova Scotian children were depicted in the "gruesome" photos and material seized. But they do not expect that will be the case.Parents of children who attended the Hebrew school, shocked by the arrest, planned to meet Tuesday night."As aware as people are that these things can and do happen, it's still a shock", said Cathy Fox, president of the Beth Israel Synagogue. Her three children - two sons and a daughter - were taught by Mr. Friedman at the synagogue's Hebrew school. "It's a very difficult time."The cantor - who leads the congregation in song - taught her 13- year-old son songs and chants that were part of his bar mitzvah ceremony last October, Mrs. Fox said.Some members will feel betrayed as a result of the charges. "I think the elderly members of our congregation will be very hurt by this." Some are appalled while others expressed sympathy."I'm very saddened", said Robert Wolman, president of the synagogue's board of governors.Mr. Wolman said he and other board members heard about the case Monday night and Mr. Friedman was immediately dismissed.Wearing an olive-colored trenchcoat and a black yarmulke (skull cap) over his greying hair, a pale and visibly nervous Mr. Friedman was ushered into provincial court by two sheriff's deputies. Refusing even to look up at the judge, he stared resolutely at the floor while wringing his hands."This is the first (such) charge through our office", Crown attorney Frank Hoskins told Judge Hughes Randall."But it sends a message out to the public that if you're in possession of these images from your Internet and they're child pornography, you can be charged with a criminal offence and get a criminal record and a substantial fine", Mr. Hoskins said later.Canada Customs received information about a child pornography ring in Canada and the United States operating via the Internet, surface mail, and electronic (e-mail), the Crown attorney said.Officers said Mr. Friedman's apartment was "ill-kept and unclean", and that they also found letters with explicit sexual content. A second search conducted at Chebucto Freenet yielded his e-mail records.Mr. Hoskins and defence lawyer Joel Pink said Mr. Friedman, who co-operated with police, was only using the material for his own sexual fantasies."His intent was possession, not distribution or selling", said the Crown.The former cantor - who is not married - has provided information that willhelp police bring more "like-minded individuals" to justice, Mr. Hoskins said.Outside court, police Sgt. Bill Cowper, the department's Internet specialist, said this is just the beginning."We're pursuing every angle at this time. He's not the only person. ... The investigation does involve law enforcement officials in Canada and in the United States."Police said Mr. Friedman is being investigated over the alleged distribution of photos to other Internet users.Police won't say which American agencies are involved and the U.S. Customs Service, reached late Tuesday, declined comment.Mr. Hoskins asked that Mr. Friedman surrender his computers, valued at $1,200 and $1,500 apiece, to the court in addition to the $2,200 fine ($2,000 plus a $200 victim surcharge). Two sets of handcuffs were also confiscated.After the court appearance, Mr. Friedman took the 4:45 p.m. flight to Boston to be with his family.Officials won't comment on the amount of the fine - the offence carries a maximum of five years in prison - saying that's up to the judge. But they did say there was a plea bargain.Mr. Friedman, holder of a music degree from an American university, arrived in Halifax in August 1994 and has worked at Beth Israel ever since.His last posting as a cantor was in the Detroit area.The man, whose job was to lead prayers, teach Hebrew school, and help prepare boys for bar mitzvah, has no prior criminal record, Mr. Pink said."My eldest son has a great deal of respect for the cantor", said Mrs. Fox, who wanted to break the news to her children before they heard it through the media."We have to do this in a very nonalarmist fashion ... I'm still thinking about how we will handle this."Mr. Wolman said the board of governors would review of the matter as soon as possible and plans to tighten the screening process for future cantors.Police also said they found a stash of adult pornography - 31 nude or partially-nude self-portraits - but the charges stem from the child-related material.(With staff reporters Bruce Erskine and Barry Dorey)

[Cantor Stuart Friedman] -- who led prayers and song at Beth Israel Synagogue and gave Hebrew lessons to children -- looked around the courtroom anxiously yesterday. Friedman, who wore a yarmulke and a trench coat, refused to speak to reporters.

Friedman came to Halifax from Cleveland, Ohio, 16 months ago with "a spotless reputation," synagogue president Robert Wolman said yesterday. The child-porn charges surprised members of the Oxford Street synagogue, he said.

[Joel Pink] told court Friedman, who has no previous criminal record, admitted he "fantasized" about the photos. Pink said there was no evidence the porn was intended for anything but his client's own use.

------

A respected Jewish cleric who participated in an alleged international child pornography ring left Nova Scotia hours after pleading guilty yesterday under a deal with local police and prosecutors.

Cantor Stuart Friedman, 42, appeared in Halifax provincial court yesterday afternoon on charges of possessing child pornography in his 1333 South Park St. home.

Friedman, an American citizen who has lived in Halifax for about two years, was arrested Monday.

Police said they found photographs, videos, computer graphic files on disks, hard drives and printed on paper, and magazines depicting children in sex acts.

Police also seized a book in Friedman's apartment detailing how parents can street-proof their children.

Friedman -- who led prayers and song at Beth Israel Synagogue and gave Hebrew lessons to children -- looked around the courtroom anxiously yesterday. Friedman, who wore a yarmulke and a trench coat, refused to speak to reporters.

He was to board a 4:45 p.m. flight to Boston yesterday. He left court though a side door and jumped into a waiting car.

Friedman came to Halifax from Cleveland, Ohio, 16 months ago with "a spotless reputation," synagogue president Robert Wolman said yesterday. The child-porn charges surprised members of the Oxford Street synagogue, he said.

"It was very much of a shock. I mean, you could have knocked me over with a feather. It would have been the last thing in the world that I would have thought," he said.

Wolman said the synagogue will investigate the matter.

Friedman was fined $2,000 for possessing child porn -- the first such case in Nova Scotia.

"I don't think he got off easy at all," said Hoskins. "I think it was a fair, fit and proper punishment. It's the first case like this and it sends a message out to the court that those involved in child pornography will be suitably fined and punished. "

Halifax regional police Sgt. Bill Cowper, an Internet crime expert, said there were no precedents for the court to follow.

"It's a new problem," he said. "But this is certainly an awakening to what is out there. I think parents should use this as a wake-up call to what their children and pre-adolescents could be talking to or seeing on the Internet. It's like putting them in a community of strangers."

HALIFAX A street-proofing guide found among a collection of child pornography should be a chilling wake-up call to parents.

"It tells me the average parent better get a book themselves and educate themselves and their children," said Eric Sommerfeldt, part of a national organization that provides information to protect children from abusers.

"It doesn't surprise me that it was there. If the bad guys are learning the techniques, doesn't it make make sense that parents should be aware?" Mr. Sommerfeldt, executive director of ChildFind Alberta, said yesterday. Halifax police raided the apartment of a Jewish cleric Monday and found him seated at his computer terminal downloading child pornography from the Internet. Among the cache of kiddie porn that included dozens of videos, magazines and photographs involving boys as young as eight, was information on how parents should street-proof their children.

Halifax police say they are satisfied Stuart Friedman, 42, a U.S. citizen who led songs and prayer at Beth Israel Synagogue, was not physically involved with children in the synagogue or in the material seized.

Friedman pleaded guilty and was allowed to leave Canada on Tuesday night after paying a $2,000 fine.

Mr. Sommerfeldt's organization has a video among its street-proofing materials that includes an interview with a child killer detailing how pedophiles gain the trust of their victims.

"He bragged about how he could get any child, how he could get around any street-proofing methods."

ChildFind tried showing the video to groups of parents, but found many could not stomach listening to the man, who was hanged in Washington state in 1993.

"The wolf was teaching the sheep what to do to keep out of trouble," said Mr. Sommerfeldt. "But they didn't want to listen."

A police officer who specializes in cyber-porn says parents should tape a list of basic cautions to the family computer, such as don't talk to strangers. And never contact anyone they've met on the Internet without a parent.

"Parents have to wake up and pay attention to what your kids are doing on the computer -- especially on the Internet," said Bob Matthews, head of the anti-pornography unit with the Ontario Provincial Police.

"And get the computer out of the bedroom ... to a more central place where you can see what the child is doing and reading."

Mr. Matthews concedes there is no guarantee that any number of parental warnings will ensure safety, since children may just forget.

"But it's important parents do everything they can to street-proof their child and always make sure they feel comfortable telling you anything."

In recent months, the OPP unit completed two major investigations involving the Internet distribution of child pornography. In one, police charged a Defence Department employee who was accused of using a government computer hooked to the Internet at work.

Police also seized 20,000 computer files from a Kirkland Lake man, including photos and video clips of children who appeared drugged and in pain.

U.S. Customs officers in Baltimore are now involved in the investigation of a child pornography scandal for which a Jewish cleric was convicted in Halifax this week.

But U.S. officials wouldn't say Wednesday if they planned to arrest Stuart Friedman, who pleaded guilty Tuesday in Halifax to possessing reams of kiddie porn, some of which he had downloaded from the Internet.

Friedman, 42, cantor at the Beth Israel Synagogue in Halifax until his arrest Monday, flew to his hometown of Baltimore on Tuesday after he paid a $2,000 fine and a $200 victim surcharge.

U.S. Customs officers in Baltimore are now involved in the investigation of a child pornography scandal for which a Jewish cleric was convicted in Halifax this week.

But U.S. officials wouldn't say Wednesday if they planned to arrest Stuart Friedman, who pleaded guilty Tuesday in Halifax to possessing reams of kiddie porn, some of which he had downloaded from the Internet.

``We are aware of Mr. Friedman,'' said Vincent Redosta, in charge of a special investigations unit at the U.S. Customs office in Baltimore.

``We are in contact with our Boston office and are looking into (it).''

Friedman, 42, cantor at the Beth Israel Synagogue in Halifax until his arrest Monday, flew to his hometown of Baltimore on Tuesday after he paid a $2,000 fine and a $200 victim surcharge.

It's believed U.S. authorities, including the FBI, are investigating whether Friedman was involved in distributing the kind of pornography that cluttered his Halifax apartment.

Both prosection and defence say evidence seized in the apartment -- hundreds of photos, videotapes and books depicting children performing sexual acts -- was for Friedman's personal use. He also had a streetproofing guide for children.

Friedman, who taught children at the city's orthodox Jewish temple, swore he didn't victimize any children in the congregation he left behind, the synagogue president said Wednesday.

``He swore he never touched anybody and told me he had offered to take a polygraph,'' said Bob Wolman. ``I believe him. I want to believe him.''

Canada Customs officials, who started the Friedman investigation, and Halifax police, who worked with customs, concede his arrest is just the start. U.S. police are hot on the trail of a potential international kiddie-porn ring.

Marilyn Young, a senior customs intelligence officer in Ottawa, said one arrest often leads to others.

``The initial contact is made through the Internet, then they send things through the mail. One arrest can lead to another because of those contacts.''

Friedman did provide police with information after undercover officers in California apparently keyed in on him while surfing the Internet.

A new Massachusetts law orders convicted sex offenders to alert police when they enter the state, Boston police officer Jim Browning said yesterday.

"If they move in within the city limits they have to register," said Browning. "They have 48 hours to go to the local police department to be fingerprinted and photographed."

`Name would pop up'

If Friedman doesn't register, he could face "jail, or a fine, or both."

Browning said hearing Friedman was flying into Boston was unsettling.

"It would worry me who my next-door neighbor is if I didn't know him," he said. "You want to know everybody in your community that you can possibly know.... That's why we have this (sex offender) registry now."

Friedman -- who led prayers and song at Beth Israel Synagogue and gave Hebrew lessons to children -- came to Halifax from Cleveland, Ohio, 16 months ago.

The 42-year-old hadn't been investigated for, or charged with, any sex crimes in that city, said Cleveland police Sgt. Muriel Craig, from the department's sex crimes unit.

If Friedman returns to Ohio, he would have to get his name placed on that state's sex offender registry, said Craig.

"There would be an entry made in the computer so that if someone were to be checking on (him) for a position that involved children, then (his) name would pop up on the computer."

When they raided Friedman's South Park Street apartment Monday, Halifax regional police found photos, videos, computer graphic files on disks and hard drives, and magazines depicting children in sex acts.

They also found snapshots of Friedman with children, said Const. Gary Martin. "But they were not of any sexual nature whatsoever," said Martin.

Beth Israel president Robert Wolman went over some of Friedman's collection with investigators yesterday. He was glad not to recognize any of the children in the photos.

"I'm sure it will alleviate any fears," said Wolman. "I'm satisfied."

Now that Friedman has a criminal record, it will be hard for him to get a job near children, he said.

"He'll carry this baggage with him for the rest of his life," said Wolman. "At least other people can be forewarned."

Part of Friedman's deal with Canadian authorities was that he leave the country immediately. But investigators will continue to wade through the reams of child pornography he left behind, said Martin. "The book's not closed because we have not had the opportunity to go over 100 per cent of that material."

Investigators arrested Friedman after his apartment was raided because they were worried the cantor might bolt. But that meant they only had 24 hours to lay charges, said Martin.

"How long do you think you're going to stay around after I've seized a bunch of child pornography out of your apartment?" he said.

"We could have taken a chance, I suppose, and said `Well, we're going to continue the investigation.' "

But the only charge police were sure of was possession, said Martin.

`Real loser'

The search warrant for Friedman's apartment has been sealed for a year "to protect some information that we have in relation to the investigation and possible ongoing investigations that another agency (in the U.S.) may be involved in."

Friedman could have been collecting the child porn for a long time, said Martin.

"If no one's ever caught him or no one's ever said anything, you'd never know," he said. "It's the real loser, usually, that's caught the first time."

While Martin is relieved to find no local children were part of Friedman's kiddie-porn stash, it's cold comfort.

"These photos and images of thousands and thousands of different children had to be made somewhere in the world and children had to be exploited," he said.

"No one can even try to tell me that they're being done of their own free will. They are being forced, or coerced, by people of authority to commit these sexual acts. They're being victimized."

HALIFAX - A street-proofing guide found among a collection of child pornography should be a chilling wake-up call to parents.

"It tells me the average parent better get a book themselves and educate themselves and their children," says Eric Sommerfeldt, executive director of ChildFind Alberta, a national organization that provides information to protect children from abusers.

"It doesn't surprise me that it was there. If the bad guys are learning the techniques, doesn't it make make sense that parents should be aware?"

PORN ON INTERNETHalifax police who raided an apartment found the occupant seated at his computer terminal downloading child pornography from the Internet. Among the cache of kiddie porn that included dozens of videos, magazines and photographs involving boys as young as 8, was information on how parents should street-proof their children.

Halifax police say they are satisfied Stuart Friedman, 42, a U.S. citizen who led songs and prayer at a synagogue, was not physically involved with children in the synagogue or in the material seized.

Friedman was allowed to leave Canada this week after paying a $2,000 fine.

Sommerfeldt's organization has a video among its street-proofing materials that includes an interview with a child killer detailing how pedophiles gain the trust of their victims. "He bragged about how he could get any child, how he could get around any street-proofing methods."

ChildFind tried showing the video to groups of parents, but found many could not stomach listening to the man, who was executed in Washington state in 1993.

PEDOPHILES GAIN TRUST"The wolf was teaching the sheep what to do to keep out of trouble," says Sommerfeldt. "But they didn't want to listen."

A police officer who specializes in cyber-porn says parents should consider taping a list of basic cautions to the family computer, such as don't talk to strangers. And never contact anyone they've met on the Internet without a parent.

"Parents have to wake up and pay attention to what your kids are doing on the computer - especially on the Internet," says Bob Matthews, head of the anti- pornography unit with the Ontario Provincial Police. "And get the computer out of the bedroom . . . to a more central place where you can see what the child is doing and reading."Internet; Canada; child; pornography.

"There are new sentencing guidelines in the Criminal Code that just came into effect in '95," says Dalhousie University Law School criminal law professor Carol Aylward. "Pursuant to those new rules, there is sort of a directive to use incarceration as a last resort.

Jail is the sentence of last resort, Aylward said, not only because prison is extremely expensive for taxpayers, but because "it's not necessarily the best deterrent. There's no guarantee that by incarcerating someone you are sending a message on general deterrents -- so other people don't commit the same crime -- or having a direct impact on the accused person.

In some cases -- johns who visit prostitutes, for example -- Aylward said the best deterrent is shameful publicity. Damage to a person's reputation is also taken into consideration during sentencing. [Stuart Friedman] woke up Monday morning a respected cleric; by Tuesday supper, his life was a wreck.

JAIL. DISMEMBERMENT. Community service. A suspended sentence. A fine. House detention. Death. A society can punish crime in any number of ways.

The sentence raises questions. Most immediately: what punishments were available in this case?

The selection was poor. Because Friedman, an American, was also ordered out of the country, he could not be sentenced to house detention, a suspended sentence, or to perform community service.

The question gets deeper. When we as a society punish someone, what do we want -- rehabilitation or revenge? Passions cry out for revenge, but the justice system takes a calmer, more practical view.

Death and dismemberment are popular sentences in other parts of the world, but do not have a role in Canadian justice. So it was either jail or a fine. That was a choice the court found simple.

"There are new sentencing guidelines in the Criminal Code that just came into effect in '95," says Dalhousie University Law School criminal law professor Carol Aylward. "Pursuant to those new rules, there is sort of a directive to use incarceration as a last resort.

"That's not to mean incarceration never happens. It's still at the discretion of the judge, and depends on the offence. But it's like using community service as an alternative to incarceration where possible. The courts are encouraged to do that ....

"Wherever it's appropriate to impose some other sentence, the Code mandates it. In some cases that will be the case. In others, the crime will be so horrendous as to not lend itself to that."

Jail is the sentence of last resort, Aylward said, not only because prison is extremely expensive for taxpayers, but because "it's not necessarily the best deterrent. There's no guarantee that by incarcerating someone you are sending a message on general deterrents -- so other people don't commit the same crime -- or having a direct impact on the accused person.

"So where it can be shown that another form of sentencing will result in deterrence, it's appropriate to do that."

In some cases -- johns who visit prostitutes, for example -- Aylward said the best deterrent is shameful publicity. Damage to a person's reputation is also taken into consideration during sentencing. Stuart Friedman woke up Monday morning a respected cleric; by Tuesday supper, his life was a wreck.

But what of the system of fining as punishment? A fine hits the poor harder than the wealthy: many people couldn't simply write a cheque for $2,000.

"(Fines) do raise issues of class," Aylward said. "Yet some of the new rules around fines allow for the payment of the fine over time. So in some sense the class issue has been dealt with."

Hmm. It's hard to see how having more time to pay makes the system much fairer, but Aylward also said a judge will sometimes set a fine in accordance with a person's ability to pay. "But there are usually standards in sentencing. So the fine (is the same) no matter what the circumstances of the accused."

In Friedman's case, there was no standard -- he was the first person in Nova Scotia charged with possessing child pornography. The Crown and defence agreed $2,000 was fair, and the judge concurred.

Child pornography is as evil as can be, and at first glance Stuart Friedman's sentence seems light. But justice is as imperfect as the law is blunt.

"Fines have been around a long time," Aylward said. "Whether it's appropriate to this particular case, lots of people will have views on that .... But the conviction remains the same. The stigma of having been convicted of a crime."

Thirty-nine of 45 callers and e-mailers said they disagreed with the Crown for recommending a now-disgraced Jewish cantor be fined $2,000 and sent home to the United States after being caught with child porn, some of which he had downloaded from the Internet.

One caller was worried the "situation speaks of darker things," while an angry Ralph Gosley, of Truro, said Stuart Friedman got caught just in time.

Another male caller said the sentence is a "disgrace and a humilation to the whole community." That was restrained next to the comment of a female caller who wanted Friedman castrated.

Fining a man for his collection of child pornography does not act as much of a deterrent, say respondents to The Daily News Hotline.

Thirty-nine of 45 callers and e-mailers said they disagreed with the Crown for recommending a now-disgraced Jewish cantor be fined $2,000 and sent home to the United States after being caught with child porn, some of which he had downloaded from the Internet.

The Hotline asked if the sentence fit the crime.

One caller was worried the "situation speaks of darker things," while an angry Ralph Gosley, of Truro, said Stuart Friedman got caught just in time.

"If I had my way I'd send him directly to hell, where he belongs," Gosley said.

Another male caller said the sentence is a "disgrace and a humilation to the whole community." That was restrained next to the comment of a female caller who wanted Friedman castrated.

Greg Belair of Halifax said the fine puzzles him.

"It doesn't make sense to me that in the case of a person caught selling even a small amount of marijuana, it seems to be guaranteed jail time," he said.

E-mailer regular Stephen Charchuk said the sentence was a slap on the wrist.

"These are sick individuals who need professional help, not to be sent on their way to commit it again somewhere else," he wrote.

But another e-mailer, Jane Schlosberg, said while the punishment fit the crime, news coverage has been excessive and has provided a severe punishment.

"Mr. Friedman is to be pitied for his pathetic obsession, but I hope people will remember that he molested no one, he hurt no individual," she said.

The Daily News Hotline allows readers to speak out on current issues. It does not purport to be a scientific sample of public opinion. Questions appear Wednesday and Sunday. Results appear Saturday and Wednesday.

We seem to be almost licking our chops at the case of Stuart Friedman, the cantor of the Halifax orthodox Jewish congregation who pleaded guilty this week to possessing child pornography. I wonder why we're so taken with this case. And I wonder if we know how hypocritical we're being in our reaction.

Exploiting children for our sexual gratification is horrifying. It's more horrifying still when violence is involved (as it surely was in the making of some of the pornography in this case). But I wonder if our reaction to what Cantor Friedman did, which was to take some kind of distorted pleasure from sexual stories and pictures of young boys, doesn't also have something to do with our deep and distorted feelings about sex, and especially homosexuality, and about religion, and especially Jews.

Do we care that when we buy Nike shoes we are exploiting children who are forced by poverty in countries like Bangladesh to work for a pittance, for the profit of corporations and for our vanity? And do we care that we are exploiting children in countries like ours who will do anything -- even pose for the kinds of pictures that surfaced in the Friedman case -- so that they buy things like Nike fashions?

We seem to be almost licking our chops at the case of Stuart Friedman, the cantor of the Halifax orthodox Jewish congregation who pleaded guilty this week to possessing child pornography. I wonder why we're so taken with this case. And I wonder if we know how hypocritical we're being in our reaction.

Exploiting children for our sexual gratification is horrifying. It's more horrifying still when violence is involved (as it surely was in the making of some of the pornography in this case). But I wonder if our reaction to what Cantor Friedman did, which was to take some kind of distorted pleasure from sexual stories and pictures of young boys, doesn't also have something to do with our deep and distorted feelings about sex, and especially homosexuality, and about religion, and especially Jews.

We don't know for sure -- these things often don't come out for years -- but it seems that Fried-man did not make sexual contact with any boys. In any case, we shouldn't be as surprised as we seem to be that a religious leader should engage in activities that we find repugnant. Surely not after all we've heard of the way Roman Catholic brothers and priests, and others, have abused children in their care.

For whatever reason -- though of course it has nothing to do with reason -- Friedman was drawn to young boys. But that's not the point, which is that we shouldn't expect any amount of God-fearing orthodoxy -- or for that matter intelligence, education or social status -- to protect a person from sexual longings, conventional or perverted.

Friedman has not lived a cloistered life. As we now know, he lived in contact -- of a kind -- with countless other Internet users around the world.

And he lives in a society that is obsessed with sex. He, like you and me -- and like our children -- is subject to unceasing pressure from advertising and other cultural forces to see everything in the light of sexual activity. He's as likely to be affected by it as we are.

We are all complicit in innumberable ways in encouraging the depiction of children as sexual, and sexually provocative and promiscuous, beings.

Everyone who reads fashion magazines, watches fashion television, buys clothing that has been modelled by teenage girls -- and women made to look like teenage girls -- is complicit in the sexual abuse and exploitation of children. (Or do we believe that the sexual exploitation of girls, so much more common than of boys, is somehow less odious?)

We all play a part in giving our society a tone that encourages people to take sexual advantage of others who are vulnerable because of their youth, innocence, loneliness, hunger or lack of self- esteem.

So, Stuart Friedman is one of us.

And revolted as I am by the thought of him indulging himself in the way he did, I can't escape feeling some sympathy for this pathetic man, both when I picture him sitting there alone looking at that filth on his computer and when I think of the lurching pain he must have felt when he got caught and will continue to feel whenever he thinks about this his whole life.

Yes, he was complicit in the sexual abuse of children. Yes, the people who make pornographic pictures of children expoit them hideously. But so do all of us who allow children, in their millions, to suffer, and to die of starvation and disease.

In every way that we neglect children in our community, and in our world, we are also culpable.

Why do young boys and girls take to prostitution? Do we imagine they are compelled by some gene? Or do we admit that it's because they're unloved and lonely?

How is it that pedophiles succeed in persuading children and young teenagers to engage in sexual activity with them? Do we imagine pedophiles have magnetic personalities? Or do we admit to ourselves that some children prefer any kind of love, any kind of embrace, to the unloved and empty lives they lead?

We don't take them to our beds, true. We just ignore them or pretend they don't exist.

And do we care that when we buy Nike shoes we are exploiting children who are forced by poverty in countries like Bangladesh to work for a pittance, for the profit of corporations and for our vanity? And do we care that we are exploiting children in countries like ours who will do anything -- even pose for the kinds of pictures that surfaced in the Friedman case -- so that they buy things like Nike fashions?

Do we care that millions of children in our country are underfed, inadequately clothed, and ill educated?

Rabbi Saul Aranov of Beth Israel synagogue said his sermon to worshippers dealt primarily with children.

Saturday was the first sabbath since police and Canada Customs inspectors found a large collection of child pornography, including magazines, videos and downloaded Internet images, in a raid on [Stuart Friedman]'s apartment last Monday.

Aranov said he never had better teaching arrangements than with Friedman and they both had an excellent rapport with students.

HALIFAX (CP) -- A rabbi told his congregation Saturday to remember the good things done by a former cantor convicted last week of possessing child pornography.

Stuart Friedman, a 42-year-old American who lived in Halifax for two years, left the country last week after police seized a library of child porn in his home.

Rabbi Saul Aranov of Beth Israel synagogue said his sermon to worshippers dealt primarily with children.

"Even though they find out things about people, (they) shouldn't lose their faith because the good that people taught them, it remains," he said in an interview Sunday.

Saturday was the first sabbath since police and Canada Customs inspectors found a large collection of child pornography, including magazines, videos and downloaded Internet images, in a raid on Friedman's apartment last Monday.

Friedman pleaded guilty the next day and was fined $2,000.

He immediately caught a plane to his family home in Baltimore.

As cantor of the orthodox synagogue, Friedman led the congregation in prayer.

He also taught children in Hebrew school and helped boys prepare for their bar mitzvah.

Aranov said there was a sense of relief in the congregation after his sermon Saturday.

"It taught them that even if a human being is imperfect, we were all created by the Divine in the image of the Divine and the struggle of life is always there for everybody," he said.

Aranov said he never had better teaching arrangements than with Friedman and they both had an excellent rapport with students.

"It's something that shocks you and then you have to realize that people, the way they live their own private lives, things happen," he said.

"The man was not a married man. He was already 42 years old. In our faith, you have to be married to maintain a normal existence."

OTTAWA (CP) -- Police are sailing into the unchartered waters of privacy rights and computers after charging several people with downloading child porn- ography off the Internet.

Officers with the Ontario Provincial Police pornography crime unit refuse to reveal the techniques they use to build cases against people caught with huge stockpiles of child porn.

Defence lawyers and legal experts say constitutional issues surrounding the state's right to monitor a person's private computer will surface as the cases come to court.

"How are police getting access to what you are doing at your computer in your home?" asks defence lawyer Marie Henein.

"It's a little frightening that you could be sitting at your computer at home, just as you could be on your phone talking to somebody, and the police can be assessing what you're doing. Our courts have gone a very long way to control the type of monitoring the police can do on phones."

Last week, a Halifax cleric pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography. Cantor Stuart Friedman, of the Beth Israel Synagogue, used the Internet to download some of the material. He paid a $2,000 fine and left for Boston.

HALIFAX -- After months of intensive investigation by Canada Customs and Halifax police officials, it took but a few minutes for cantor and Hebrew school teacher Stuart Friedman of Halifax's Beth Israel Synagogue to plead guilty to charges of possessing child pornography and be returned to his native United States.

Friedman, 42, was a teacher. choir director and leader of services at Beth Israel Synagogue since August 1994. Well respected in his synagogue duties. the cantor's private interests were unknown to synagogue officials. I'm speechless," said president Robert Wolman. "Our whole congregation is in shock."

Friedman, relieved of his duties at the synagogue. was fined $2.000 and flew to his native Baltimore within hours after his conviction.

We bought him an airline ticket to Baltimore, told him we'd pack his things and send them to him, and put him on the plane," said one synagogue board member.

Police raided Friedman's apartment in south end Halifax, Jan. 6, after securing a search warrant. They discovered, and took as evidence. two computers, dozens of computer discs containing pornographic material, a few sets of handcuffs. books, more than 300 explicit photos and over 50 pornographic video tapes and scores of magazines.

It was disgusting," said Const. Gary Martin, public affairs officer of the Halifax Regional Municipality Police Department. "The discs showed explicit pictures of young boys in sexual acts, covering every form of pornography. Ninety percent of it was obtained indirectly or directly from the Internet."

He said there were photos of children and a concern was that he may have been taking local photos. "We're trying to find out it locals are in these pictures."

After the plea and sentencing, defence lawyer Joel Pink emphatically told reporters no local children were in the pictures. He and Wolman had examined the photos prior to Friedman's court appearance. Friedman taught Hebrew school and conducted bar mitzvah classes at the synagogue.

Crown attorney Frank Hoskins said Friedman was cooperative with police when they entered his apartment. "He had only used the photographs for his own sexual fantasies. His intent was possession, not distribution or selling."

Friedman, not married, helped police further their investigation by providing information to bring more like-minded individuals forward.

Outside court, a police officer told reporters the investigation is international in scope and far from over.

We're pursuing every angle. He's not the only person involved. The investigation involves law enforcement officials in Canada and the United States."

In addition to the fine, Friedman forfeited his computers, valued at a total of $2,700. He said privately later that he realizes he has an illness and will seek help.

When reporters suggested the fine might be lenient for such a crime, police officer Martin said, "This individual has lost more in his standing in his own community than just $2,000.

Synagogue officials were scheduled to meet with parents of bar mitzvah boys from the past two years in their own investigation of the cantor's activities. But it was strongly felt he did not act improperly with his students.

To the editor: To insist that the full force of the law be brought to bear on cantor Stuart Friedman and that he be banished from the community for possessing child pornography does nothing to solve crimes of vice; it exacerbates the problem by driving it further underground.

We must cure the cause and stop bandaging the effects. Psychological treatment is needed for the offenders, improved child care programs to protect the innocent, and social guidance for our youth to channel sexual expression.

Cantor Friedman no doubt lives in a dual world, tormented in his private existence by demons of his own that led him to his unsavory obsession, while leading an exemplary public life dedicated to bringing the word of God to the Jewish community of which he was a prominent and respected member.

Perhaps he was a victim of such abuse as a child and needs compassion, not enmity and harshness.

Did not one of the world's most famous Jews preach to love the man no matter what the act and, when facing the public ready to stone the prostitute, say, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" (John 8:7)?

Friedman didn't cross line: But society has by condemning a man for what he was thinkingBy Stephen KimberDaily News. Halifax, NS: Jan 17, 1997

What did Stuart Friedman really do? Not what did the former cantor at Halifax's Beth Israel synagogue think. Not even what did he fantasize in the deepest, darkest corners of his imagination. But what did he actually do?

What was the true nature of the heinous crime that led to his recent public humiliation, his dramatic guilty plea on charges of possession of child pornography, his slap-on-the-wrist $2,000 fine and his hasty exit from this country back home to the U.S., where he is now marked by American police forces -- probably for life -- as a dangerous pedophile?

Based on what we know from what the police have revealed about the circumstances of his arrest, Friedman fantasized about having sex with young boys and collected pornography to satisfy those desires.

Based on what members of the congregation at Beth Israel have said publicly about their recollections of Friedman's two years as cantor there, he did not -- again so far as we know -- ever act on any of those fantasies.

In real life -- which is, after all, where we live our real lives -- the fact is that Stuart Friedman did not betray the trust of those parents who placed their children in his care. Unlike Graham James, the junior-hockey coach who recently pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting boys in his charge, Friedman appears to have been a model of rectitude in his daily dealings with children.

He was, by all accounts, a good cantor, a teacher who helped prepare the boys in his charge for their bar mitzvahs, their rite of passage into Jewish manhood.

If he had not indulged his sexual obsessions by downloading pictures from the Internet -- which is how police discovered him -- it is possible those private fantasies would have remained just that, and he would have continued to lead a productive, useful life as a respected member of his community.

The point I'm trying to make is simply that there is an important difference fantasy and reality, and that most people -- Friedman apparently included -- can make that distinction, and accept that there are boundaries you do not cross.

Friedman's sexual fantasies may be abhorrent to most of us, but if he doesn't act on them, are they really any of our -- or the judicial system's -- business?

Some may argue that merely possessing the kind of material police found in Friedman's apartment is tantamount to tripping past that last step on the slippery slope to acting out those fantasies with real children.

But the research on that is far from conclusive, and there are those who argue persuasively that so-called pornography may act as a safety valve for those with deviant sexual tastes, allowing them to indulge their fantasies without having to act on them.

Others argue that even if Friedman didn't exploit children directly, he did so indirectly by buying the wares of the vultures who traffic in youngsters for sexual purposes.

That's true to a point, and a more difficult argument to counter. But the fact is that people who buy certain expensive brands of running shoes may also be guilty of aiding and abetting child slave labor in Third World countries.

But we don't normally charge people who buy running shoes with crimes against children.

The problem is that it's too easy to get caught up in our understandable disgust with the notions that run through Stuart Friedman's head and assume that whatever punishment the criminal justice system decides to mete out to him is merited.

But where do we draw the line? "You can't go to jail for what you're thinking," is a line from a long-ago popular song. The question, in light of the Friedman case, is whether it is true anymore.

STEPHEN KIMBER'S column of Jan. 17, Friedman Didn't Cross Line, might more aptly have been titled, In Praise of Perverts and Perversion.

After reading the first paragraph, I thought perhaps Kimber was just trying to tweak our noses. As I continued, however, a series of "Oh my's" passed involuntarily from my lips and I realized he was quite serious.

In a curious piece of moralizing, he really did try to make a case for child pornography and, in so doing, painted cantor Stuart Friedman as a victim of distorted societal reasoning and unfair law.

You'll remember the recent spectacular disclosure that the cantor has a sexual preference for male children and satisfied his pedophilic urges with videos, magazines and pictures downloaded from the Internet.

Kimber's defence of Friedman contained the following points.

We ought not punish someone for what they may be thinking.

Child pornography is no more exploitative than child slave labor in Third World countries.

To suggest that Friedman was nabbed in a sting operation by the thought police misrepresents reality. He was arrested because he possessed obscene and, therefore, illegal material.

Over the years, our obscenity laws have become progressively narrowed. To be judged obscene today, the material has to be truly odious.

According to Anthony Keller of The Globe and Mail, "the Supreme Court has additionally said that for something to be obscene it must have the potential to cause harm." This constricted the definition of obscenity from what we think is offensive (the community- standard test) to what Canadians find harmful.

The real issue here is not freedom of thought but whether or not any harm was done when Friedman pursued his fantasies by using illicit material. An overwhelming majority of our global village has determined that the sexual exploitation of children is terribly harmful and warrants strong deterrence in law.

Kimber admits this is the weakest part of his argument, but proceeds to offer an insipid counter.

Groping for an analogy to make his case, he draws a comparison between child pornography and what he calls child slave labor in Third World countries.

First of all, what he considers to be child slave labor is an entirely debatable issue and certainly does not attract the nearly universal derision attached to the sexual exploitation of children.

But, even if he is right on this, and he's not, it would be more logical to condemn child labor than to use it as an argumentative convenience to make a case for the indefensible.

I'd suggest a more simple analogy based on what Kimber refers to as "where we live our real lives."

I believe he has children. We know he would never have allowed them as youngsters to be sexually exploited so that deviants like Friedman could indulge their sexual fantasies.

Surely, if it is wrong for his children, it is equally wrong for other children, regardless of their vulnerabilities. It would be hypocritical to think otherwise.

I take no solace in the revelation that Friedman appears to have been a paragon of virtue within his community. I'm rather more concerned with the access he had to young boys, his sexual preference, as he prepared them for their bar mitzvahs.

This would seem to fit some of the patterns for sexual predators as reported by Andrea MacDonald in The Daily News. There is some evidence they seem to seek out situations where targets are available to them and, coincidentally, as many as 85 per cent of them are known to their victims.

Maybe, just maybe, Friedman did not molest any of the young boys given over to his care, but there is no doubt in my mind that he surely fantasized about them or possibly satisfied himself with seemingly innocuous touching that tingled his warped senses.

If he didn't do anything, the evidence is strong that it could only have been a matter of time before he did.

Our community is better off without him and, having been publicly marked for the potential menace he is, others will be protected from him.

January 1997 will, for a long time, be remembered as that month when the Halifax Jewish community made headline news. Unfortunately, it was bad news.

Stuart Friedman, the cantor at Halifax's Orthodox Beth Israel Synagogue, was convicted and sent back to the United States for possessing and distributing child-pornography.

The conviction sent waves of disbelief throughout the Jewish community. Besides having to deal with the problems this event posed to Jewish communities as a whole, the Halifax Jewish community had to face the media frenzy that comes with such a situation. This was, after all, one of the biggest stories to hit Halifax in a long time.

This scandal was the lead story on television news for four days.

It was also front page news in the papers for a number of days. And commentaries on this crisis continued to be in the papers all through January.

One of the things that disturbed me was the way in which the news media referred to the synagogue. It was identified as a Jewish church.

I was watching the local ATV news when the story broke. The anchor introduced the story and said that Friedman was a cleric at the Beth Israel Jewish Church. This made me cringe. How could someone call the synagogue a church?

I immediately telephoned the newsroom. The news editor to whom I spoke asked me how I would describe a synagogue. I told him that people probably know what a synagogue is, but if they didn't know, then it could be described as a Jewish place of worship.

Within an hour, the news station had received more than 30 calls correcting their misnomer. When a friend of mine called the news editor, he sighed before thanking her for calling then added that she was one of many who had called in,

My question is, why did people have to call in? Shouldn't a well-known news station know that a synagogue is not a Jewish church? The mere wording of Jewish church is a paradox. The papers and radio stations also made this error.

I am left feeling confused. Did this misnomer occur to facilitate an understanding of what a synagogue is or did the researchers think it wasn't a significant distinction?

I was also asked many questions by my friends on how I felt about this whole issue. Was I shocked? Did I know the cantor? Did I agree with the sentence he was given?

Yes, I was shocked. Yes, I knew the cantor. Yes, I agree with his sentence.

Friedman came across as a pleasant man. He was very quiet and kept to himself. I had met him a few times, but had never really had an in depth conversation with him. His crime really came as a shock to me.

My first reaction was "Oh no, how could this happen?" Then, I thought of the effects this incident would have on the Halifax Jewish community and on the global Jewish community as a whole.

The Jewish communities worldwide are, despite inter-religious controversies, very tight-knit. Any time something unsavory happens in one community, all communities feel the impact.

Because Jews are often seen in a negative light, because we are often accused and slandered by outsiders, we have learned through history to stick together, to work as a community to dispel common misconceptions about who we are.

So, when a crime of this magnitude occurs in our community, the outside world loses no time in casting aspersions on the entire Jewish community. On the Jewish communities worldwide. Picking us apart.

There was a mad rush within the media to get the scoop. Members of the Jewish community were hounded down to comment on Friedman's obsession with child pornography. The community became the focus for media attention.

And this is why I agree with Friedman's sentence. Friedman was fined $2,000, he had to give his two computers to the police and he had to leave the country immediately. Friedman's leaving the local community is the best thing that came out of this case. Rather than have him stay in this community and encourage more press coverage, the culprit was gone.

I felt torn between two worlds. I wanted the Halifax Jewish community to have its privacy. But, I'm also a journalist. I know that if I were assigned to cover such a story, I too would have been one of people those asking the questions.

The Halifax Jewish community began picking up the pieces. The community, as a community, is still dealing with the fallout of this disturbing incident. The Halifax community is still in the process of self-examination and of healing.

LOS ANGELES - A former cantor at a Halifax, Nova Scotia, synagogue was arrested over the weekend on charges of distributing child pornography, U.S. officials said Monday..

Stuart Friedman, 43, was accused in a federal indictment of sending an undercover FBI agent in Long Beach computer disks that showed young boys engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Authorities said Friedman contacted the agent through the Internet in 1996.

Halifax police searched his home in January 1997 and arrested him on charges of possessing child pornography.

Although he was employed at the synagogue at the time, Canadian authorities said there was no evidence that Friedman was sexually involved with any children there.

Convicted on the Canadian charges, Friedman paid a $2,000 fine and was deported to the United States.

METRO RESIDENTS would be wrong to imagine there is a cold- blooded killer stalking the halls of the QEII Health Sciences Centre. But they could not be blamed for thinking so, thanks to a justice system that likes to keep a tight lid on matters of public in

The truth of the matter -- details that would lead to a conclusion that we are dealing with a "mercy-killing" at worst -- cannot be told because it is traditionally regarded as contempt of court, although a recent Supreme Court ruling calls that into question.

The search warrants carried by about 40 police officers who invaded the hospital May 6 are usually considered public documents. Anyone can inspect them, to form an opinion as to whether the police and courts were justified in their invasion of a citizen's privacy.

This time, however, the warrants have been "sealed" to protect the integrity of the investigation. (The police used the same device to hide the warrants they used to roust cantor Stuart Friedman out of town for collecting alleged child pornography. We say alleged because although Friedman pleaded guilty, the public wasn't allowed to see the evidence against him.)

So, absent the right to speak freely and access to an "open" court system, we have this: a squadron of police descend on a hospital, seize computers and boxes of records, arrest a respected doctor at her place of work, and charge her with "first-degree murder."

YOU WOULD think there would be some expanation of what prompted the charges. You would think there would have to be some accounting for the material -- which could include your medical files -- that they seized.

This case is likely to set a wide precedent in the treatment of the terminally ill and what actions should be (or already are) permitted as a matter of practice or of law.

It is a complex issue that, we must assume, requires a mass of document-ation from the hospital. In that case -- again an assumption -- maybe the job required platoons of police (the department says 37 officers entered the new Infirmary to seize material in 20 offices). The treatment of Dr. Nancy Morrison after her arrest has angered hospital colleagues; rightly so if her complaints are substantiated.

But there is no accounting now for any of these events. An explanation, in fact, is illegal. Accountability for the materials seized will have to wait until memories have faded and other, more pressing priorities take precedence.

ATV, which has applied to court to unseal the warrants, is performing a signiciant public service in raising the issue of police/Crown accountability in this case.

A Jewish cleric who admitted to possessing kiddie-porn in his Halifax apartment last year may face further charges under United States law.

Cantor Stuart Friedman was arrested in January 1997 after he accidentally started chatting with an undercover Los Angeles FBI agent over the Internet, according to search warrants obtained from Halifax provincial court yesterday.

The Los Angeles FBI field office would not comment on the operation yesterday because of "pending litigation" against Friedman by the Los Angeles United States Attorney's office, said FBI spokesman John Hoos.

Although Friedman was arrested in Halifax, the FBI maintains his Internet activities fall under United States law.

The Friedman file is "under review" and no charges have yet been laid. The matter has to go before the grand jury before charges are laid. Investigators would not say yesterday whether other suspects in an alleged international child-porn ring are also being investigated.

Friedman was arrested Jan. 6, 1997, after Halifax regional police received information from FBI Special Agent David Watson of the Southern California Sexual Assault Felony and Enforcement Team about an undercover operation.

On July 18, 1996, Watson communicated with Friedman through Internet electronic mail. Friedman was originally connected to Compuserve, but switched to Chebucto Community Net, the documents say.

After several e-mail conversations, Friedman sent two diskettes to Watson containing images of young boys. Some of the images depicted child pornography, the documents say.

Investigators seized one pair of handcuffs and one pair of leg irons in the cleric's 1333 South Park St. apartment during a raid.

Two computers, VHS cassette tapes, computer discs, a "large quantity" of magazines, a photo album and Internet documentation, such as e-mail, were also seized.

Sealed for year

The search warrant for Friedman's apartment had been sealed for a year.

The Southern California Sexual Assault Felony and Enforcement Team (SAFE) is a full-time, multi-agency task force formed in 1995. Its mission is to prosecute crimes that involve child sexual abuse and exploitation. The team focuses on child pornography, child molestation and child prostitution, with an emphasis on computer crimes.

Friedman, 43, left Nova Scotia for Boston hours after pleading guilty to charges of possessing child pornography under a deal with local police and prosecutors. Friedman, an American citizen, had lived in Halifax for about two years.

Police said they found photographs, videos, computer graphic files and magazines depicting children in sex acts.

Police seized a book in Friedman's apartment detailing how parents can street-proof their children. They also found snapshots of Friedman with children, but they were not of a sexual nature.

Friedman -- who led prayers and song at Beth Israel Synagogue and gave Hebrew lessons to children -- came to Halifax from Cleveland, Ohio, with "a spotless reputation," synagogue president Robert Wolman said after the arrest.

Friedman was fined $2,000 for possessing child porn -- the first such case in Nova Scotia. He agreed to leave Canada immediately.

LOS ANGELES A former cantor at a Halifax, Nova Scotia, synagogue was indicted in Los Angeles on federal child pornography charges, a prosecutor said today.

Stuart Friedman, 43, was arrested over the weekend at his current home in Baltimore, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Nancy Kardon. The U.S. Attorney's Office plans to ask that Friedman be brought to Los Angeles to stand trial.

According to prosecutors, in November 1996 Friedman sent two computer disks containing 13 visual images of minor boys engaged in sexually explicit conduct through the mail from Halifax to Long Beach.

Friedman was under investigation at the time for allegedly sending child pornography to an undercover FBI agent he met via the Internet, Kardon said.

In January 1997, Friedman was arrested after law enforcement officers searched his home and found dozens of videos, magazines and photographs of boys as young as 8 engaged in sexual situations.

He was convicted in Canada and fined and deported to the United States. At the time of his conviction, Friedman was still leading songs and prayers at a synagogue.

Canadian officials said there is no evidence Friedman was physically involved with children at the synagogue or other children.

NOTES: Assistant U.S. Attorney Nancy Kardon's number is (213) 894-0546.

A former cantor at a Halifax, Nova Scotia, synagogue has been arrested on charges of distributing child pornography, the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles said Monday.

Stuart Friedman, 43, was accused in a federal indictment of sending an undercover FBI agent in Long Beach computer disks that showed young boys engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Authorities said Friedman contacted the agent through the Internet in 1996.

Halifax police searched his home in January 1997 and arrested him on charges of possessing child pornography. Although he was employed at the synagogue at the time, Canadian authorities said there was no evidence that Friedman was sexually involved with children there.

Convicted on the Canadian charges, Friedman paid a $ 2,000 fine and was deported to the United States, where he took up residence in Baltimore. He was arrested there on a Los Angeles federal grand jury indictment issued Friday.

LOS ANGELES -- A former cantor at a Halifax, Nova Scotia, synagogue was arrested over the weekend on charges of distributing child pornography, U.S. officials said Monday..

Stuart Friedman, 43, was accused in a federal indictment of sending an undercover FBI agent in Long Beach computer disks that showed young boys engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Authorities said Friedman contacted the agent through the Internet in 1996. Halifax police searched his home in January 1997 and arrested him on charges of possessing child pornography.

Although he was employed at the synagogue at the time, Canadian authorities said there was no evidence that Friedman was sexually involved with any children there.

Convicted on the Canadian charges, Friedman paid a $2,000 fine and was deported to the United States.

A Jewish cleric who was fined $2,000 and kicked out of Canada for possessing child pornography while cantor at a Halifax synagogue is facing 15 years in a United States prison on similar charges.

Stuart Friedman was arrested Friday night at his home in Baltimore after being indicted by a federal grand jury in Los Angeles for distributing kiddie porn.

Friedman, 43, was arrested by special agents with the U.S. Customs Service working in co-operation with the Southern California sexual assault enforcement team.

"This is a significant crime," said U.S. Attorney's Office spokeswoman Nancy Kardon.

Friedman, an American citizen who lived in Halifax for two years, led prayers and gave Hebrew lessons to children at Beth Israel Synagogue. He came to the synagogue from Cleveland, Ohio. Robert Wolman, president of the synagogue at the time of Friedman's Halifax arrest, had said Friedman came to the local congregation with a "spotless reputation."

The U.S. charges stem from an Internet chat with an undercover FBI agent. Friedman and the agent communicated by e-mail between 1996 and 1997 with the cantor, who eventually mailed two computer diskettes to the agent. The disks contained 13 pictures of young boys engaged in sexually explicit conduct, according to a news release issued by the U.S. Attorney's office.

On Jan. 6, 1997, Halifax regional police executed a search warrant on Friedman's residence after being alerted by the FBI. Police found photos, videos, computer files and magazines depicting children in sex acts. Police also seized a book telling parents how to street-proof children and non-sexual photos of Friedman with children.

Friedman was arrested and convicted in Halifax provincial court of possessing child pornography. He was fined $2,000 in the first such case in the province. Friedman agreed to leave Canada immediately. He went to Boston and then moved to Baltimore, where he is believed to have been working with a Jewish organization. His job did not involve working with children, said Kardon.

U.S. authorities kept track of Friedman's movements as they continued to build their case.

Halifax Regional Police were informed of Friedman's arrest over the weekend, said spokeswoman Judy Pal.

If convicted, Friedman faces a maximum sentence of 15 years in a federal prison and a $250,000 US fine. L.A. prosecutors will seek Friedman's extradition from Maryland.

"We consider all these cases significant, but when we find someone in possession of this much child pornography, it is important to prosecute them," said Kardon.

Cantor Gets Prison For Child Porn - Courts: The Synagogue Offical Mailed Images of Children Having Sex To An Undercover FBI Agent. He Recieves A 15-Month TermTimes Wire ReportsLos Angeles Times - March 2, 1999, Tuesday, Home Edition

A synagogue official deported from Canada after mailing child pornography to an undercover FBI agent in Southern California was sentenced in Los Angeles Monday to 15 months in federal prison.

Stuart Friedman, who served as the cantor of a synagogue in Canada, also must undergo three years of supervised release after finishing his prison term, U.S. District Judge Carlos R. Moreno said.

Friedman, 45, pleaded guilty in November to one count of distributing child pornography, which carries a maximum 15-year prison term. The judge ordered him to begin serving his sentence April 12, said Thom Mrozek, spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles.

Friedman, who is originally from Philadelphia, had been a synagogue cantor--the individual who leads a congregation in song--in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

In November 1996, he mailed two computer disks containing 13 images of boys having sex to an undercover FBI agent in Long Beach.

He was convicted in 1997 at Nova Scotia Provincial Court of possessing child pornography and deported to the United States.

Friedman moved to Baltimore, where he was arrested in August on the federal charge of distributing child pornography.

Congratulations to Milford Sorensen, vice-president of IGA, for withdrawing the latest issue of the tabloid Globe from their newsstands. And also to management at Superstore, Super Value and Save-Easy for also refusing to sell this latest Globe issue.

Perhaps, with the support of the above large corporations, we will be able to subdue the excesses of sensational journalism, eliminate childpornography, and halt the publication of sexually explicit articles. An example of such articles was published earlier this month in another of metro's leading newspapers.

In their Jan. 8 front-page story of the investigation and sentencing of Cantor Stuart Friedman, the Halifax Herald Ltd. newspapers went beyond all decency by irresponsibly describing the materials discovered in his home in completely unnecessary and graphic detail.

As parents and grandparents, we have a responsibility, as indeed does society, to protect our children from the evils of this world. Does this mean that we must now prohibit them from reading newspapers? Surely local publishers do not wish to be considered as members of the tabloid family and their ilk. By following the leadership of Mr. Sorensen and others, they could have done better.

No offence intended, Spryfield: Sullying neighbourhood's name was not my aimBy David Swick

Daily News. Halifax, NS - November 26, 1998. pg. 2

News that former Haligonian Stuart Friedman has pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography in California raises an ugly question. Was our sentencing of the former Beth Israel Synagogue cantor far too lenient?

Friedman was convicted of possession of child porn in Halifax 22 months ago, fined $2,000, and asked to leave Canada immediately. He got on the next plane, and has been living the life he chooses ever since.

Now, though, he is in big trouble. Having admitted sending an FBI agent two computer diskettes containing 13 pictures of children engaged in sex acts, Friedman faces a maximum sentence of a $380,000 fine and 15 years in prison.

LOS ANGELES (CP) -- A Jewish cleric who left Halifax after being fined for possessing child pornography was given a 15-month sentence in California yesterday for distributing child pornography in the United States.

Stuart Friedman, 44, dressed in white slacks, a navy blue jacket, yellow checked tie, and soft-soled black shoes, could have been sentenced to a maximum of 15 years.

"Your lawyer has done an excellent job," said Judge Carlos Moreno of the Los Angeles District Court, who told Friedman he should thank the prosecutors as well.

Friedman's lawyer, Marcia Brewer, succeeded in reducing the level of punishment -- initially to 17 to 20 months. He also was sentenced to three years' probation.

She convinced the judge to reconsider some of the probationary conditions so Friedman will be allowed to possess a computer, with certain restrictions, and won't have to disclose his financial status to probation officers.

She also persuaded the judge to remove the requirement that Friedman must disclose his child-pornography conviction to parents of anyone younger than 18 with whom he has contact.

Instead, Friedman is ordered to just notify his employer.

Friedman, a U.S. citizen, has been living in Maryland after having posted a $75,000 US bond. On April 12, he will enter a prison which will provide him with the level of counselling he has been receiving since he left Canada.

Three months ago, Friedman pleaded guilty to the federal indictment of sending to undercover FBI agent in Long Beach, Calif., two computer disks containing pictures that showed young boys in sexually explicit conduct.

Judge Moreno said he took into account the pictures were not of boys younger than 12 and did not depict sadism.

Friedman had arrived in Halifax in 1994. The cantor led prayers and songs at a synagogue in Halifax and gave Hebrew lessons to children.

He pleaded guilty in January 1997 to possessing child pornography, was fined $2,000 and allowed to leave Canada.

He had been arrested after a lengthy Canada-U.S. investigation. When police raided his apartment, they seized at least 300 still photos showing nudity and sex acts involving children as young as eight.

A month after his arrest, Friedman pleaded not guilty to the charge of distributing pornography but changed his plea to guilty in November.

WEEK IN REVIEWFormer Halifax cleric Stuart Friedman was given a 15-month sentence in Los Angeles, Calif. for distributing child pornography. A cantor at Beth Israel Synagogue for about two years, Friedman was allowed to pay a fine and leave Canada in 1997 after pleading guilty in Halifax to possessing child pornography. He has lived in Maryland since then.

In the last two years, Nova Scotia authorities have investigated about 200 cases of cyber-crime -- everything from Internet money- bilking schemes and commercial crime, to prostitution and distributing child pornography.

And the province has beefed up its resources to deal with the new frontier of crime.

"Smaller police forces are coming to us and saying, `Can you help us?"' Halifax Regional Police cyber-cop Sgt. Bill Cowper said last week.

The regional force has 16 investigators trained to investigate Internet crime and two forensic experts who can testify in court about electronic evidence.

The RCMP also has a technological crime section.

Two years ago, the province's public prosecution service began training Halifax Crown attorney Craig Botterill to deal with Internet crimes once they make it to court.

Not that it happens that often. Although about 200 possible crimes have been investigated in the two years since he took on the job, most don't make it to court -- probably because a lot of the complaints made end up being a matter of taste rather than a crime.

Of the 18 cases prosecuted, though, all but three have resulted in guilty pleas.

Not rank-and-file

"I think it says something about the type of people who are committing these crimes. They're not your rank-and-file thug. They're white collar, they're often university educated," Botterill said.

"When the police come banging at their door with a search warrant, they usually throw their hands up and immediately confess. I've never seen so many confessions."

Botterill said Halifax's high number of highly educated residents and our fascination with the Internet makes the city ripe for Internet crime.

Although there aren't any statistics available on Net crime in Halifax, Cowper said we have more than our share of child pornography offences.

A month ago, Shawn David Walsh and Shawn Michael Iyoupe were charged with using a chat room to sell a 15-year-old girl's sexual services.

And in a high-profile 1997 case, American citizen and respected Jewish cantor Stuart Friedman pleaded guilty to participating in an international child pornography ring. He was fined $2,000 and ordered to leave the country.

A Halifax Crown attorney will appear before the Supreme Court of Canada today to represent Nova Scotia's interests in a child pornography case that could have monumental impact in our courts.

Crown attorney Dan MacRury, who prosecutes criminal cases in Halifax provincial court, travelled to Ottawa over the weekend to prepare for the case.

Nine judges of the Supreme Court will hear the case of a British Columbia man who has so far successfully challenged the country's child-porn possession laws.

Robin Sharpe, 66, was charged in April 1995 after police and customs agents seized photos of nude boys and short stories he had written in a collection called Kiddie Kink Classics.

The section of the Criminal Code under which he was charged forbids possession of child pornography, including video, photos, magazines or computer-generated images of people under 18.

Mr. Sharpe argued and won his first case without a lawyer, saying the material was his own and not intended for publication.

Two lower courts agreed with him that the possession law is too broad and threatens freedom of expression and privacy rights under the Charter of Rights.

So now it is up to the Supreme Court to decide whether those rulings should be upheld or struck down.

Nova Scotia has applied for intervener status in the case, which means the Supreme Court will allow Mr. MacRury to make a short presentation on behalf of the province.

"Basically, in terms of the rules of court, Nova Scotia has 15 minutes to argue the appeal," Mr. MacRury said in an interview from his Ottawa hotel Monday afternoon.

He said Nova Scotia felt strongly about the case because "it's about the protection of children against the harm of child pornography.

"The reason why we're intervening is to protect children from the harms that flow from it."

Mr. MacRury, who has practised criminal law since 1989 and became a prosecutor four years ago, volunteered to represent the province at the Supreme Court.

This will mark his first appearance before the country's top court, and he mhas been preparing for the case for six weeks.

Nova Scotia made the decision to intervene in December, "and I've been working on the case ever since then," Mr. MacRury said.

Intervener status is granted in recognition that outside parties could have an interest in a court case.

Nova Scotia is one of 12 interveners who will be heard over the course of the two-day hearing. Others include religious and family groups, criminal lawyers, police associations and civil liberties groups.

The attorney general of Canada and several other provinces are also scheduled to make presentations.

"The order of preference (for presentation) goes in the order the provinces joined confederation," Mr. MacRury explained, saying that Nova Scotia will follow Ontario and Quebec at the hearing.

If the Supreme Court chooses to strike down the law, any possession charges now before the courts in this province will have to be thrown out.

One of the most notorious child pornography cases since the law came into being in 1993 was prosecuted in Nova Scotia.

Cantor Stuart Friedman pleaded guilty in January 1997 to downloading almost 225 images of child pornography from the Internet. The former Hebrew school teacher and congregational leader at Beth Israel Synagogue was fined $2,000 and ordered to surrender his two computers to the Crown.

Cantor Stuart Friedman regularly prays at the Glenn Avenue Shul. As of today Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer has not warned parents in the community that a convicted sex offender is a regular at his synagogue nor has a safety plan been made public.

The Awareness Center is asking everyone to contact Rabbi Hopfer and demand that he make the following information public. We are also asking that the following be apart of the safety plan.

Parents within the Eruv of Baltimore be notified that Cantor Stuart Friedman resides in the community. The notification must include his photograph as a way to keep unsuspecting children safe.

A special minyan be created in which no children under the age of 21 are present, so that Stuart Friedman can daven without being tempted.

Stuart Friedman be escorted when he is in shul or any other public location in which children can be present. Mr. Friedman especially needs to be escorted when using the bathroom or in hallways.

The callers have been outraged that The Awareness Center would have a CALL TO ACTION on a person "who was only convicted on charges of having child pornography -- that no charges were ever brought on actual child molestation of a child."

Unfortunately, there are individuals that do not understand that only 16% of those who have been molested ever report their crimes to law enforcement. It is not that uncommon for those who are sexual predator to own child pornography, even though one of their victims have never reported the heinous crimes to the police. It is also known that it is not that uncommon for a sexual predator to have photographs of some of their victims.

In the United States along with many other countries, it is illegal to have in your possession or on your computer pornographic pictures of children. When one is caught with these sorts of images it is considered a sex crime and one in which if convicted, the holder of the photographs would be placed on the National Sex Offender Registry. The United States government considers those convicted of possessing child pornography to be a danger to children. For that reason The Awareness Center has placed Cantor Stuart Friedman on our web page and have also issued a CALL TO ACTION demanding that Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer protect children in the community from Cantor Stuart Friedman.

The Jewish Coalition Against Sexual Abuse is calling on a Baltimore rabbi to warn parents that a convicted sex offender who served time in federal prison for possessing child porn is now living in their community and praying at their synagogue.

The international coalition, based out of the Awareness Center in Baltimore, is demanding that Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer develop a public safety plan to protect members of his Glenn Avenue Shul from Cantor Stuart Friedman, 54, of 6016 Clover Road, a registered sex offender who regularly prays at the synagogue.

Friedman could endanger children unless parents are aware of his 1998 conviction for possessing pornographic images of young boys performing sexual and sadomasochistic acts, the coalition told The Examiner.

Hopfer has not complied with the coalition's demands that he notify parents within the Eruv of Baltimore that Friedman is residing in the community or that he create a special minyan without children under the age of 21, so that Friedman can pray "without being tempted," said Vicki Polin, the Awareness Center spokeswoman.

A Baltimore survivors coalition is starting a public awareness campaign this week to break the silence about the sexual abuse of children within Jewish communities.

The Jewish Coalition Against Sexual Abuse, an international network based out of the Awareness Center in Baltimore, is organizing a series of "speak outs," that are aimed at allowing suppressed survivors of sexual abuse to educate others through their stories. The speak outs start Monday in Brooklyn, N.Y., and will begin in Baltimore Feb. 8.

Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer speaks at the Glen Avenue Shul.

The coalition also wants local rabbis to implement "safety plans" to protect children from registered sex offenders who are attending services at their synagogues unbeknownst to parents. However, some community members said outing a convicted sex offender is unjust to the offender who already has been punished through the court system.

The coalition recently faced a backlash from Rabbi Yaakov Hopfer, who refuses to notify members of his Glenn Avenue Shul that they attend services with Cantor Stuart Friedman, 54, a registered sex offender in Maryland. Friedman spent time in federal prison for participating in an international child porn ring.

The coalition asked Hopfer to notify parents within the Eruv of Baltimore that Friedman resides in the 6000 block of Clover Road. The coalition also asked to create a special service excluding children under the age of 21, so Friedman can pray "without being tempted," said Vicki Polin, the Awareness Center spokeswoman.

"We don't think our demands are outrageous, because this is someone who's aroused by children. He's dangerous," said Polin, who added that the Jewish Coalition Against Sexual Abuse has "a few thousand members."

Polin said she worries that Friedman could endanger children, possibly by photographing them, if he is not escorted in the synagogue.

The coalition contacted Hopfer with its demands, but "he just slammed down the phone," Polin said.

Hopfer encourages victims to report abuse to a rabbi instead of police, Polin said, and uses the Holocaust to illustrate that "reporting another Jew will bring on more hatred to the Jewish community." (Please note that the Vicki Polin was explaining the laws of mesirah to the reporter)

"It's like the Catholic Church all over, but not as large," she said. "They encourage people to come to them rather than authorities, but they don't have education or training in how to handle these things."

Hopfer was reluctant to discuss Polin's allegations in a phone interview, saying he "refuses to cooperate" with the coalition because "they're irresponsible people."

"This is opening up something that I don't want to speak about," he said. When asked if he notified his synagogue of Friedman's criminal record, Hopfer said, "I can only say that we've done everything possible to be responsible, caring people."

Hopfer also denied ever referencing the Holocaust to encourage members of his synagogue to report ab use to a rabbi rather than authorities.

"I've been accused of many things and these allegations don't mean a thing," he said.

Hopfer said he wrote a letter to the community about a year ago "acknowledging that such things exist and people should speak with a professional or a rabbi and sometimes police," but he would not provide a copy of the letter.

"We encourage people to go to the police, and also speak with a rabbi if they need to, because this is a person who has committed a crime and could be dangerous," he said.

Friedman's neighbor, who was too scared to give her name because she also attends the Glen Avenue Shul, said the coalition's demands would only tarnish Friedman's reputation.

"I think the Awareness Center should be going after people who are actually molesting children and not someone who just looked at things on the computer," she said.

Friedman told The Examiner he had no comment.

He has lived in the Orthodox Jewish Baltimore community since May 2007 when he finished a 15-month sentence in federal prison for sending pornography through the mail to an undercover FBI agent in California, according to a March 1999 Los Angeles Times story.

Before that conviction, Friedman was arrested in Nova Scotia, Canada, where he was a cantor at Beth Israel Synagogue leading prayers and teaching children Hebrew lessons.

Canadian authorities suspected Friedman had participated in an international child porn ring, and raided his residence in September 1996 where they found him seated at his computer downloading child pornography from the Internet, according to newspaper reports in the Daily News in Hailfax, Nova Scotia.

Police seized hundreds of images, and dozens of videos depicting children, some as young as 8 years old, performing sexual acts, according to the Daily News.

Canadian authorities said no evidence existed that indicated Friedman was physically involved with children in the synagogue or in the material seized.

He pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography and received a $2,000 fine before he was deported to the United States and arrested on federal child porn charges.

Friedman stood trial in Los Angeles and could have faced up to 15 years, but his attorney, Marcia Brewer, successfully argued the punishment down to 15 months in prison and three years of probation, according to the Awareness Center.

Brewer also persuaded the judge to remove the requirement that Friedman disclose his child-pornography conviction to parents of anyone younger than 18 with whom he has contact because the pornography didn't include boys younger than 12, according to the Awareness Center.

Brewers argued that the pornography Friedman mailed to the FBI agent only depicted boys over the age of 12.

Friedman, who was listed as noncompliant for more than a year on the Maryland Sex Offender Registry, is now considered in compliance.

---------------Please Note:The reference to the mentioning of the holocaust by Vicki Polin was part of the explanation of the laws of mesirah to the reporter.

The Baltimore Examiner neglected to report that cantor
Stuart Friedman, who is currently on the National Sex Offender registry rents his
apartment from Devorah Shore, who is the daughter of alleged sex offender, Rabbi Moshe Eisemann. Mrs. Schor also owns a small Jewish magazine called "Where, What, When"It is also important to be aware that Friedman's next door neighbor are the parents of convicted sex offender, Shmuel Juravel, who plead guilty to three counts of traveling to have sex with a child and use of the Internet to entice a child to engage in illegal sex acts

FAIR USE NOTICESome of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Subscribe to The Awareness Center's Newsletter

Translate

Survivors ARE Heroes!

The Awareness Center believes ALL survivors of sex crimes should be given yellow ribbons to wear proudly.

Survivors of sexual violence (as adults and/or as a child) are just as deserving of a yellow ribbon as the men and women of our armed forces, who have been held captive as hostages or prisoners of war.

Survivors of sexual violence have been forced to learn how to survive, being held captive not by foreigners, but mostly by their own family members, teachers, camp counselors, coaches babysitters, rabbis, cantors or other trusted authority figures.

For these reasons ALL survivors of sexual violence should be seen as heroes!