Lie in court, and the DEA still might pay you, audit finds

Congress is raking the CEO of Wells Fargo over the coals http://abcnews.go.com/Business/round-wells-fargo-ceo-testify-front-congress/story?id=42432315 because the bank defrauded tens of thousands customers involving some 5-10 million dollars… which has been refunded to those customers impacted. Congress fined the bank 185 million dollars and Congress BULLIED the board of directors of Wells Fargo to CLAW BACK $41 MILLION of compensation already paid to CEO John Stumpf and appears to not be satisfied until Stumpf is FIRED and sitting on the curb. But there is proof that the DEA has wasted TENS OF MILLIONS, defrauded the US TAXPAYERS over a similar FIVE YEAR PERIOD… and where is the Congress and all the House/Senate hearings ? Does the DEA have “something” on some of the senior members of Congress… to keep Congress “in-line” and turn a blind eye to the DEA’s actions ? Or is it just that 43% of Congress is attorneys and they just understand how our judicial system works and that law enforcement needs to “break laws” to help them enforce our laws ?

WASHINGTON

The Drug Enforcement Administration paid its informants tens of millions of dollars even after at least one of them lied in court.

That’s according to a new report by the Justice Department inspector general, which scrutinized DEA offices across the country, including Sacramento. The inspector general’s auditors found that more than 9,000 law enforcement sources had been paid a total of $237 million for information or services.

Yet the DEA, which relies on such informants to investigate drug trafficking, did not “adequately” oversee the money flowing to its more than 18,000 sources between Oct. 2010 and Sept. 2015, Thursday’s report said.

The sloppiness “exposes the DEA to an unacceptably increased potential for fraud, waste and abuse, particularly given the frequency with which DEA offices use and pay confidential sources,” the inspector general’s office said.

The DEA, for instance, prohibits paying informants who were “deactivated” because of arrest warrants or other serious offenses, but auditors found one had been used after being deactivated for lying during trials and depositions. The source was paid more than $469,000 and used by 13 offices for five more years.

The inspector general’s office estimated the DEA may have paid about $9.4 million to more than 800 previously deactivated sources. The office, however, said it had received shoddy data, and it could not say definitively why they were deactivated.