Congratulations to the DOJ Voting Section. Congratulations to DOJ attorney, and former member of the Yale Democrats, Daniel Freeman. You’ve provided the DCCC a great fundraising device — all within just a few hours! Nicely played.

While many are rightfully shocked by the degenerate behavior of DOJ and the entire Obama regime, it is part and parcel of the US’s planned deterioration for many years. However, what is currently being witnessed is ratcheted up on steroids, under the most radical POTUS in US history. He has been ‘put in place’ to effectuate the shake up.

Seeing events through the prism of the red/green alliance makes sense out of what would otherwise appear insane. Therefore, viewing the entry of the Muslim Mafia into the halls of US power circles takes on new & urgent meaning.

The illegal behavior at DOJ will come into clearer focus. Many blacks haven’t a clue, but the radical left (the ‘reds’) need them to stir the pot to effectuate their goals. This geo-political train has long left the station…it is now being played out in full force.

Jeff, and you realize how difficult it is for a dead person to get a photo ID. they have to call and have friends dig them out of the ground, then they need makeup to make them look presentable, and the smell isn’t so good, and after getting the photo they have to be driven back and reburied.

So much easier to just let someone else vote for them, especially if that person is lib/dem.

Liked your post, just had to ad the satire.

Wasn’t this like the movie about Bernie, or someone, that had to be kept alive for appearance sake.

Isn’t it odd, and so hypocritical, that the same people who were clamoring for the removal of John Ashcroft for the supposed crimes a decade ago are totally silent about the obvious crimes of Eric Holder now.

Oh for anyone interested in why this is important it would imply that the site and any transactional processing service underlying it would not be PCI compliant (CISP standards). Would be almost fun to report it to the VISA/Mastercard/Amex CISP groups just to see the fallout.

The “media” is playing a dangerous game, look at this article from Pravda

“Suppose Mitt Romney ekes out a victory in November by a margin smaller than the number of young and minority voters who couldn’t cast ballots because the photo-identification laws enacted by Republican governors and legislators kept them from the polls. What should Democrats do then? What would Republicans do? And how would other nations respond?…”

Read on to see the rest of this, is this the game plan of the Left? I wish this writer would go to Mexico and see how tough their election laws are.

Is not the admission that properly accounting for the principle of one person, one vote would lead to “voter suppression” an admission to illegal vote schemes?

Why is the DOJ more focused on the suppression of minority votes than the suppression of majority votes?

For instance, should the state institute conditions that would suppress a tiny percentage of voters who were mentally incompetent, financially unable, or merely lacked the preserverance to overcome the state instituted obstacles, such as gaining a picture ID. Why would that be of significantly more interest as compared to a scheme to insert 1000 false votes, thus suppressing the will of the people and 10′s of thousands if not 100000′s of thousands of voters?

That President Obama and the Attorney General are opposed to voter photo ID at polls only shows that they want to rig elections. They have already shown this by refusing to prosecute the case against the New Black Panthers in Philadelphia who tried to intimidate voters at the polls. They are thoroughly dishonest.