If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Chromium is pretty lightweight an still it can run on wayland or close to it. an yet has more features or should i say its atleast usable unlike Epiphany. Epiphany IMO is a badly coded browser . Redhat have there heads up there Ass if they think Epiphany will or can compete with any other browser

i dunno if epiphany can use GTK3 Dark Background but if not, i believe Firefox is on the way achieving that goal. AFAICT . whoever designed Epipany doesnt have much coding skills.

Chromium is pretty lightweight an still it can run on wayland or close to it. an yet has more features or should i say its atleast usable unlike Epiphany. Epiphany IMO is a badly coded browser . Redhat have there heads up there Ass if they think Epiphany will or can compete with any other browser

If you cut down on your abusive language and be more informed, you would know that Epiphany development has nothing to do with Red Hat at all and both Fedora and RHEL ships with Firefox by default.

If you cut down on your abusive language and be more informed, you would know that Epiphany development has nothing to do with Red Hat at all and both Fedora and RHEL ships with Firefox by default.

Being polite doesn't help with the fact that Epiphany sucks. It's probably nice if you like this "less is more" approach and want a browser that can't do anything right. Otherwise it's not really competing at all. It's like M$ products. If they ship it with the desktops, people will use it no matter how crap it is. Being lightweight in Epiphany way also doesn't help at all. It's only light in terms of feature set size. It uses the same heavy engine, but has worse JS performance than leading browsers. So, for power users it's not light, it's heavier at displaying HTML5 content. For users of old PCs, it's much worse than Dillo or Elinks or Netsurf. If you want a lightweight Webkit browser, there's Surf.

If you cut down on your abusive language and be more informed, you would know that Epiphany development has nothing to do with Red Hat at all and both Fedora and RHEL ships with Firefox by default.

Most if not all Gnome Devs are paid if not have a @redhat.com email address as there main email addy. . Epiphany LACKS a lot of Features a lot of people have become accustom to using in Firefox for example. i look an use every release of Epiphany an then i remove it from the system, webkit is alright but it has its limitations compared to Gecko .

Most if not all Gnome Devs are paid if not have a @redhat.com email address as there main email addy.

Really? I don't see a reference to back up your claim

You claimed "Redhat have there heads up there Ass if they think Epiphany will or can compete with any other browser". Epiphany has nothing to do with Red Hat. In other words, your claim makes no sense whatsoever.