This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our world. Watch and become AWARE!
3.5 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.

Monday, May 15, 2017

Most people don't read the Bible. They need to, if they want to know what is
going on in the world. It is indeed a strange concept that we need to read a
book that is derived from ancient history to keep current with today, but as
with much else concerning this particular book---- it's true.

Those who read the Bible know that Adam was tasked to be a caretaker of the
Earth and granted dominion over the Earth, and he was also tasked to name the
animals and trees and other things that he interacted with on Earth.

However, he was never given the task of naming himself or other men.

That task is reserved to our Father. Much later in the Bible, in fact, we
are promised that He will give us our true names.

As a result, whatever names we are given are not true names and are not
part of Adam's job to give. The practice of applying names to men is the First
Sin.

We may well ask, how are we supposed to talk about anything pertaining to
men or make reference to anyone without giving them a name?

For many generations we have used descriptions that appear to be names to a
greater or lesser extent, and so names typically have additional meanings which
create descriptions that are included on a sub rosa basis.

Names like "Anne of Green Gables" and "Geoffry of Malmsbury" are apparent
descriptions, but a name like "Anna" which means "Mother" and "Grace" also holds
descriptive meaning. This is all because we are not supposed to name each
other, but, in practice, we do.

And that is the First Sin.

That it is a sin becomes very clear when you examine the process that has
led to our current distress. When we create "persons" and name them, men become
identified as "things" and as things they lose their sanctity and dominion, and
take on the inert and alien characteristics of say, rocks.

A man is a man, but a person is a thing---- and all the profound
differences that exist between men and things apply. It is a crime to murder a
man, but there is no law against murdering a thing.

When you deliberately apply the names of living men to PERSONS as a means
of deceiving them and harming them without being held accountable, a crime of
"personage" occurs.

Personage is the act of reducing a man to a thing via a manipulation of his
given name or by changing the agreed upon usage of his name to facilitate such a
change.

For example, personage occurs when the function of your Trade Name in the
form "John Mark Doe" (which you use for international trade) is arbitrarily
redefined as the name of a Foreign Situs Trust operating in international
commerce.

This is the kind of personage the FDR committed against our grandparents.
It arbitrarily removed their names from the jurisdiction of the land and exposed
them to piracy and the loss of their material rights and interests including
their constitutional guarantees--- all without telling them.

This change was made by the Territorial United States and could actually
only apply to their Citizens, however, since nobody in the actual United States
was fully informed, a process of "assumpsit" kicked in. People just continued
to use their own familiar Trade Name as they always had, and in the process
they became misidentified government employees operating Foreign Situs Trusts
belonging to the United States of America, Inc.

Another form of personage occurs when the style of a name is changed to
conform with such a change in function.

Having redefined the use and meaning of our Trade Names on the land to
serve as the names of Foreign Situs Trusts on the sea, the perpetrators next
created so-called Municipal franchises and messed with our names again to create
Cestui Que Vie Trusts named after us: JOHN MARK DOE.

Most recently, the Municipal United States has floated a whole new scam and
arbitrarily defined names in the form "JOHN M. DOE" to be the names of US Public
Transmitting Utilities.

Well, that may be what Mr. Obama thinks they are.

I say it's just more fraud and more personage by our public servants
deliberately being used to defraud and foist off foreign debt on us via a
process of unwitting assumption.

The State of State organizations in Alaska, Maine, Washington, Michigan,
Illinois, Texas, and Utah have received Notice of Non-Assumpsit published in the
local newspapers.

These six actual States and their people have told Washington, DC and the
world at large that there is a fraud scheme in play and we don't agree with it
and we don't assume any debts related to all the names in the form "JOHN M.
DOE".

What about the rest of you people and states?

Are you all going to stand around like dumb posts and let the Territorial
United States claim that you are one of their "Citizens" and subject to their
"law" as if you were born in Puerto Rico? Are you going to assume their debts,
knowing that they are already bankrupt?

Get those Notices of Non-Assumpsit published so the Territorial United
States can't come back and say, "Hey, these people and their states assumed this
debt, so it's theirs to pay."

This is your time to object and put it on the record.

Now, it is possible that what has been done by these states that have
published their objections already could be brokered into a claim that all our
states are owed equal footing---- but do you really want to leave your state on
the list of states that they can say "acquiesced" by being silent?

---With a $20 trillion debt in the air and looking for a place to
land?

-----------------------------

See this article and over 500 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Nesaranews Mission Statement

Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?

Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle

11

Followers

The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.