Being a proud Atheist, and a freedom loving INFIDEL AKA "KUFFAR", WE are threatened by the primitive pidgeon chested jihad boys in the medieval east.
FRACK YOU!! SAY US ALL!! Don't annoy the Pagans and Bikers,, it's a islam FREE ZONE!!! LAN ASTASLEM!!!!

Escaped
eyewitnesses have reported that ISIS places Iraqi and Syrian
Christians in cages or coffins and sets them on fire.

ISIS
persecution of Christians "fits the definition of ethnic
cleansing." — Simon-Skjodt Center for the Prevention of
Genocide, at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial.

The Syriac Orthodox Church of St. Ephrem in Mosul,
Iraq, before if the captured by the Islamic State (left), and after.

When a 1,400-year-old Iraqi Christian monastery was destroyed by the
Islamic State (ISIS) most of the world condemned the demolition -- except
for spokesman for the U.S. military's Operation Inherent Resolve, Col.
Steve Warren.

"Thousands [of Iraqi Christians] have been killed, hundreds of
thousands have been forced to flee," said CNN's Wolf Blitzer in an
interview with Col. Warren the other week. "There is legitimate fear
-- you're there in Baghdad -- that the long history of Christians living
peacefully, productively in Iraq, is coming to an end. How worried should
we be about the Christian community in Iraq?"

Many extremist
Islamic groups are still shielded by states such as Pakistan, Saudi
Arabia, Turkey and Iran. These countries have so far not severed
their links, overt or covert, with these outfits.

The United
States and other members of the free world need to take corrective
measures not only against terrorist groups but also against the
states that sponsor them.

Washington, in
its relationship with Tehran and Islamabad, among others, is on the
wrong track. Its approach towards a rogue Iran is not likely to
"bring it in from the cold," but to embolden it even
further in its various terror activities the world over.

In 2014, this photo of Muslim ISIS supporters in
India's Tamil Nadu state went viral on Twitter.

Sadly, major world powers, including the United Nations, have not
appeared serious about fighting terrorism or the Islamic State (ISIS, IS)
or similar terrorist groups.

UN Security Council Resolution 2170 (August 15, 2014) called on
member-states to take "national measures to prevent fighters from
traveling from their soil to join the IS and deny it any arms or
financial support. The resolution also "expressed readiness to
consider putting on the sanctions list those who facilitated the
recruitment and travel of foreign fighters."

In Turkey,
Islamism and Pluralism Don't Mix

Slightly edited, originally published on January 20 under the
title "OK, Turkey Is a Majoritarian Democracy, not a Dictatorship."

Justice
Minister Bekir Bozdağ has an important message for the world: Turkey is not
a dictatorship.

I have no idea how many justice ministers in the democratically civilized
world have to make speeches arguing that their country is not a dictatorship.
But Turkish Justice Minister Bekir Bozdağ has recently felt compelled to
remind the world of just that. Bozdağ said the mere existence of main
opposition leader Kemal
Kılıçdaroğlu is proof that "there is no dictator in the
country." That was relieving.

But Mr. Bozdağ's line of defense is problematic. For instance, the
existence of Syrian opposition parties did not mean Syria was NOT a
dictatorship.

Bozdağ's problematic line of defense does not change the fact that
President Recep
Tayyip Erdoğan is an elected leader, or that his seat is legitimate. But
the fact that Mr. Erdoğan is not a dictator does not change the fact that
Turkey has an increasingly wider democratic deficit. That is primarily
because Islamist politics is majoritarian and can hardly make peace with
pluralism.

In his Nov. 8, 2013 editorial, "Ignoring the majority,"
Hayrettin Karaman, a professor of theology and a columnist for the
pro-government Yeni Şafak, wrote the following:

Governments cannot protect, through law and
order, any behavior the majority would dislike or view as harmful,
illegitimate and ugly. The minority will have to give up some freedoms (that
are disapproved of by the majority). The remedy ... is democracy with
reference to Islam. Otherwise the majority, whose values could be violated by
the minority, will have the right to apply neighborhood pressure [on the
minority].

Professor Karaman's doctrinaire thinking has hardly changed since then. In
his Jan. 17 column, "Freedom of opinion?" He wrote that "a
democrat would never say preposterous things like 'there is no democracy in
this country, there is dictatorship,' or 'human rights and freedoms are being
violated.'" But regarding the academics who recently signed the now
infamous declaration of peace [with Kurds] and others who defend their right
to express their opinion, Mr. Karaman wrote the following:

They view the academics' declaration as
freedom of opinion ... despite the fact that it damages our country's image,
it is against the law and ethics, and it is impossible that freedom of
opinion could allow this [the declaration] ... They are not defenders of
human rights; they are democracy fools and 'democratists' [his neologism for
possibly fake democrats].

After 13 years of Islamist rule, this kind of majoritarian thinking comes
as no surprise at all. In this mindset, a democrat would never complain of
human rights violations in his country. Why? Because the government
responsible for such violations was elected by the majority's votes/will.

Islamist politics is majoritarian and
inherently at odds with pluralism.

Similarly, according to this mindset it is impossible that freedom of
opinion could allow the academics' declaration. Why? Because it is against
the law and ethics. But which law? Universal law or Islamic law? Who will
have the authority to judge whether or not a declaration issued by academics
or plumbers is ethical? Mr. Karaman and the ulema? Or perhaps the president?

The Islamists' inherent problem with pluralism is often painful for the
minority. But the way they sometimes defend their "cause" can be
entertaining. For example, one of the staunchly pro-government (or rather
"pro-president") newspapers actually admitted that there was a
dictator in Turkey. Daily Star's front-page headline on Jan. 17 read
"Kemal the dictator," in reference to the main opposition leader.

So we know who to blame for Turkey's huge democratic deficit. Perhaps a
ban on the opposition would make Turkey a more democratic place?

Burak Bekdil is an Ankara-based
columnist for the Turkish newspaper Hürriyet Daily News and a fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Surprised?
“The US Mosque Obama Has Chosen For His First Presidential Visit Has Deep Extremist Ties,” by Chuck Ross, Daily Caller, January 30, 2016 (thanks to Plamen):

The Baltimore mosque President Obama has chosen as the
first U.S.-based mosque to visit during his presidency has deep ties to
extremist elements, including to the Muslim Brotherhood.
The White House announced on Saturday that Obama will visit the
Islamic Society of Baltimore (ISB) on Wednesday. He has visited several
mosques overseas as president but has resisted visiting one in the
homeland. The purpose of the trip, according to the White House, is to
“celebrate the contributions Muslim Americans make to our nation and
reaffirm the importance of religious freedom to our way of life.”
But ISB is a curious choice for Obama’s first domestic visit.
The mosque is a member of a network of mosques controlled by the
Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a Muslim civil rights group
named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation
terror case. Several executives with that organization were convicted of
sending money to aid the terrorist group Hamas.
An imam who served at ISB for a total of 15 years has also been a
leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood network and has worked for an
Islamic relief group that was designated as a terrorist organization by
the Treasury Department in 2004.
Mohammad Adam el-Sheikh, who served two stints as ISB’s imam, from
1983 to 1989 and from 1994 to 2003, was a member of the Muslim
Brotherhood in Sudan in the 1970s. He also co-founded the Muslim
American Society, a Falls Church, Va.-based group that is controlled by
the Muslim Brotherhood.
While in Baltimore, el-Sheikh served as a regional director for the
Islamic American Relief Agency. That group’s parent organization is the
Islamic African Relief Agency, which the Treasury Department says provided funds to Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, Hamas and other terrorist organizations.
After leaving Baltimore, el-Sheikh served as imam at the infamous Dar
al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church. That mosque has a lengthy
roster of known terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. Its imam during
much of the 1990s was Mohammed al-Hanooti. He was named an unindicted
co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six
people.
Dar al-Hijrah came under the control of Anwar al-Awlaki in 2001. He’s
the American al-Qaeda recruiter who was killed in a U.S. drone strike
in 2011. Nidal Hasan, the U.S. Army major who killed 13 people at Fort
Hood in Nov. 2009, is said to have attended the Virginia mosque when
al-Awlaki served there. The pair also reportedly exchanged emails. Two
of the 9/11 hijackers also attended Dar al-Hijrah during al-Awlaki’s
tenure.
El-Sheikh took over at Dar al-Hijrah in Aug. 2003, a little over a
year after al-Awlaki left. While there he defended Palestianian suicide
bombings against Israel.
“If certain Muslims are to be cornered where they cannot defend
themselves, except through these kinds of means, and their local
religious leaders issued fatwas to permit that, then it becomes
acceptable as an exceptional rule, but should not be taken as a
principle,” he said in 2004, according to a Washington Post article at the time.As The Post reported Saturday,
ISB’s website states that it seeks “to be the anchor of a growing
Muslim community with diverse backgrounds, democratically governed,
relating to one another with inclusiveness and tolerance, and
interacting with neighbors in an Islamic exemplary manner.”
But that desire for tolerance — which President Obama frequently
touts as well — does not appear to be a virtue shared by ISB’s resident
scholar, Yaseen Shaikh.A 2013 Youtube video shows Shaikh, who previously served as imam at a mosque in Plano, Tex., speaking out forcefully against homosexuality in Islam.
During an hour long diatribe, Shaikh called homosexuality a
psychological disorder that has no place in Islam or society. He also
lamented that gay rights groups have “hijacked” political discourse.
“This whole subject of homosexuality in the public sphere…is no
longer a religious issue, unfortunately, as much as we want to use the
religious card and try to defeat this, now it’s become a politicized
issue,” Shaikh says in the video….

A stunning new report on migrant
employment has skewered the oft-cited economic argument for mass
migration, revealing that most migrants are unemployed for years, and
countries won’t see a benefit for at least a generation.

The report for German paper Die Welt
entitled “The Truth about the Refugee Job Wonder” asks if German
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s pronouncement that migrants will be the
“labour revitalisation” of Germany is actually true? It turns out
Syrians, Afghans and Iraqis are more likely to be unemployed than the
average German by a large margin.

The Institute for Employment Research (IAB)
has conducted research into migrant employment rates and found that in
the case of Syrians their employment rate has dropped from 32 percent to
only 9 percent as recently as last November.

Afghanis and Iraqis, who are increasingly becoming a larger proportion of migrants coming into the EU according
to Frontex, don’t fare much better, with Afghan employment
participation going from 37.6 percent to 24.5 percent and Iraqi
employment going from 34 percent to 25.3 percent over the same five year
period. To put this in perspective, the employment rate of the average
German is 67.3 percent.

Migrants have an especially difficult
time and even those with professional qualifications tend to have a hard
time becoming employed. It is actually easier, according to the report,
for an unskilled native worker.

According to IFO Institute for Economic Research migration expert Gabriel Felbermayr, “We
know that people who come as refugees, much more difficult to integrate
into the labor market than those who immigrate to work,” and said,
“Usually it takes at least a generation,” until the employment rate,
“has approached the domestic population.”

This amount of time to enter the
workforce presents huge problems for the welfare system that the
migrants are thought to be able to prop up. Often the countries which
they come from improve and conditions allow them to go back, meaning a
zero return on investment from the costs associated with housing and
education.

Employers often fail to recognise the
qualifications of migrants from Africa and the Middle East as they have
found their education not comparable to a European equivalent
qualification. This leads many former professionals to low paid work and
the report says, “for companies the refugees are mainly REPORT:
Economic Benefits Of Migration Debunked, ‘A Reservoir For Low-Cost
Labour’,” and not the engineers and academics many left wing media
sources have said.

The report seems rather late when
economists from elsewhere have been saying that the migrants will be a
net negative for the German economy and rather than a benefit.

Migration Watch UK already debunked a report that tried to explain the economic benefits of the migrant crisis. They determined, as Die Welt
has, that putting over a million people on welfare, paying for
retraining, language courses, accommodation and the like only takes more
money from the German taxpayer instead of supposedly propping up
Germany’s decaying welfare state.

The German people themselves appear wiser
than the experts who argue the economic benefit. It was revealed that
only 16 percent of them believe Chancellor Merkel’s idea of a
migrant-fuelled economic miracle, as Breitbart London has reported.

http://muslimbrotherhoodinamerica.com/the-course/

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and its Role in Enforcing Islamic Law

We need to get off Saudi Barbarian OIL!!!!!Support the Canadian OIL Sands,,, and visit,, Ethicaloil.org

The gravity of the existential threat we face from Islamic Jihad is truly of epic proportions. It is essentially a battle pitting free-civilized man against a totalitarian barbarian. What is at stake is the struggle for our very soul - namely who we are and what we represent. The lives that were sacrificed for individual rights and freedoms that we've come to cherish are being chiseled away from right under our noses by the stealth jihadists. And many of us are in denial and totally clueless.

The left's appeasement and pandering to evil is nothing new. What makes their utopian delusions so infuriating and unpardonable is that it is not only they who will have to pay the consequences, and deservedly, so, they are thwarting and undermining our best efforts at resistance and are thus dragging us down in the process as well.