I really don't think there will be riots either. He has to win on his merits, if he can prove he is the best choice for president, people will vote for him over Hillary. Let's face it, Hillary certainly isn't perfect either...

I really don't think there will be riots either. He has to win on his merits, if he can prove he is the best choice for president, people will vote for him over Hillary. Let's face it, Hillary certainly isn't perfect either...

No, if the media can convince the public he is the best choice the will follow one another to vote... I don't want to see the old man, minority, or woman get elected... I think they are all one and the same, they are all just saying what they have to so they get your vote. I'll vote for none of the above if any combination of the three are the final candidates...

yup, but there is a difference between a chain email spouting bullshit and legitimate news sites.

How do you make the determination of whats legitimate when, for example, liberals complain that FOX dosen't report accurate new's. That to me means they think they are spouting bullshit.
I still like the old smoke signal thing. If a guy lied you just threw him in the fire.

How do you make the determination of whats legitimate when, for example, liberals complain that FOX dosen't report accurate new's. That to me means they think they are spouting bullshit.
I still like the old smoke signal thing. If a guy lied you just threw him in the fire.

This is an easy one to answer. Legitimate sites are the sites that agree with and reinforce what he already knows is the truth. Ilegitimate sites are those sites that disagree with what he knows to be the truth.

This is an easy one to answer. Legitimate sites are the sites that agree with and reinforce what he already knows is the truth. Ilegitimate sites are those sites that disagree with what he knows to be the truth.

the obama is a muslim thing/american flag thing started in a chain email. if that's where you get your news, good for you. :tonka: