Is There Value in 3D Systems?

Though the technology of 3D printing (additive manufacturing) is still in its early stages of development, many analysts are estimating that it will grow at a CAGR of 20%-30% for the next seven years and will nearly quadruple its value by 2020. It was widely assumed that the pioneer of the 3D printing industry, 3D Systems (NYSE:DDD), was well positioned to capitalize on this growth, but the impending arrival of another big-name player in the form of Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ) may restrict 3D Systems from fulfilling its potential.

Why 3D Systems May Not Succeed

3D Systems has to steer clear of many roadblocks before it can fulfill its potential, and the arrival of Hewlett-Packard has further added to those difficulties. I will tell you why I think HP can pose a major threat to all the existing 3D printing companies, but first let's take a look at the challenges faced by 3D Systems.

The method of producing a simple product via 3D printing can consume plenty of time and can even last for a couple of days. By comparison, conventional industrial machines can churn out thousands of fully-finished products every day, and there's no way a present-day 3D printer can compete against that. Also, the fact that a 3D printer does not produce a fully-finished object and requires an extra step of removing the object from the printer, further delays the printing process.

So, when analysts projected that the 3D printing market will be worth $12 billion by 2020, they assumed that additive manufacturing will replace the process of industrial production. However, given the fact that the industrial manufacturing process is a lot faster, this assumption seems irrational.

High Cost

The cost of setting up a traditional industrial machine is very high, but it makes up for it with its efficiency. This however, is not the case with 3D printers. Not only is a top-end 3D printer highly expensive, but the material used in printing is also not economical. And given the slow speed of 3D printers, spending over the odds for setting up multiple printers won't be considered profitable.

Can Hewlett-Packard Dethrone 3D Systems?

Hewlett-Packard's CEO, Meg Whitman, told the Canalys Channels Forum in Bangkok that the company is planning to enter into the 3D printing market by June 2014. Whitman claimed that HP sees this industry as an exhilarating business opportunity and aims to become a leader in the 3D printing market.

Though Whitman didn't reveal much information as to what 3D printing products HP will be offering, she stated that the company will focus on reducing the time consumption and bringing down the costs of 3D printers, which will give it a huge competitive advantage over 3D Systems.

With a market cap of more than $49 billion, Hewlett-Packard will become the biggest player in the 3D printing industry. Therefore, the thought of producing faster and cheaper 3D printers isn't too far-fetched for HP as the company has enough resources to fund the Research and Development (R&D) of this technology.

To put into perspective, HP spent more than $3.4 billion on R&D in the 2012; therefore it's evident that the company will not shy away from spending on R&D once it enters the market.

Furthermore, with more than $13 billion in cash, Hewlett-Packard can even consider acquiring other small name players like Arcam AB, Organovo, and ExOne, which will diversify its product offerings. All these companies have annual revenue of less than $50 million, but they are enhancing their revenues rapidly by improving their product offerings and may become a takeover target for Hewlett-Packard in the future.

Also, the expiration of several key patents that prevent competition in the market for most advanced 3D printers means that HP will not have to spend a massive amount of time on creating more sophisticated high-resolution 3D models.

3D Systems A Lost Cause?

3D Systems will have to continue to innovate in order to fortify its position as the market leader. The company has been overindulged in acquisitions and has taken over 40 companies since 2011.

This string of acquisitions has helped 3D Systems to improve its product offerings,. So far, this tactic has been working well, but the company will have to lay more emphasis on technological innovations in order to proficiently challenge HP.

Moreover, 3D Systems has added Seiko-I Infotech and Synnex Corporation to its list of global sellers. The company expects these additions to drive its sales in the future.

Furthermore, HP doesn't appear to be targeting the home-consumer market, which plays to the advantage of 3D Systems as the company recently strengthened its position in the consumer market by launching two printers called Cube and CubeX. The company also strengthened its seller network by striking up a deal with Sindho Ink to distribute Cube, and CubeX printers in South Korea. This implies that 3D Systems' presence in the consumer market is prominent and this should help the company to perform better than its existing peers even after the arrival of HP.

Comparing The Fundamentals

At present, 3D Systems is trading at roughly $59.40, and with a trailing P/E ratio of 131.85, it is obvious that the stock is expensive. By comparison, HP is trading at $32.04 and has a forward P/E ratio of 11.74. Therefore, investors looking to benefit from the 3D printing business will have an economical and more diversified option in the form of HP, when it enters the market. In addition, a high dividend yield of 1.80% will also tempt investors into buying HP's stock.

Conclusion

Hewlett-Packard's entry into the 3D printing market is great news for the industry as a whole, but might upset the sales of all the existing players due to the aforementioned reasons. Since HP hasn't entered the market yet, investors should hold onto their 3D printing investments. But, if the company manages to "walk the talk," it will prove to be a better investment than 3D Systems. So, investors looking to profit from this industry should keep an eye on Hewlett-Packard as it has the potential to become one of the biggest companies of the industry.

Disclaimers: GuruFocus.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on GuruFocus.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The gurus may buy and sell securities before and after any particular article and report and information herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article and report posted herein. In no event shall GuruFocus.com be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on GuruFocus.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, GuruFocus.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. The gurus listed in this website are not affiliated with GuruFocus.com, LLC.
Stock quotes provided by InterActive Data. Fundamental company data provided by Morningstar, updated daily.