March 11, 2018

8:12 pm

Frances McDormand ended her Best Actress acceptance speech at the Oscars with the term,referencing a provision actors and actresses can put in their contractsto stipulate specific representation standards for films that are proportionate to real-world population breakdowns.

The terms of an inclusion rider encompass several minority groups including women, people of color, members of the LGBTQ community and the disabled community. McDormand’s speech served as a rallying cry for representation in the film industry and was met with both acceptance and backlash. In my opinion,inclusion riders are a step in the right direction toward a more inclusive industry that actively promotes opportunities for underrepresented people.

As the film industry strives toward equal representation, it is important to consider notonly what changes must be made, but also how they can be implemented throughout the industry. Solutions such as inclusion riders may not fix every aspect of underrepresentation, but they’re a concrete idea for an industry that sometimes lacks specificity in its dialogue surrounding diversity.

McDormand’s speech was praised by many who thought inclusion riders were a change Hollywood should embrace.Director Ava DuVernay also supported the idea, saying in an interview with The New York Times, “There are allies who are another color, who really walk the talk and we need allies who are not of color and that’s the only way things will change.”

Michael B. Jordan alsobecame the first major Hollywood star to announce he would actually startusing inclusion riders, saying March 7 thathis company would adopt such provisions for all future projects.

It’s unclear which films in the past have actually used inclusion riders in their contracts. However, many female filmmakers and filmmakers of color have said they made it a point to include women and people of color in their stories. Director Dee Rees said in an interview with BuzzFeed that many people of color have been implementing practices similar to inclusion riders for a long time.

DuVernay’s career provides two examples of this. Director Ryan Coogler confirmed DuVernay mandated the inclusion of female directors and key creatives on her TV show “Queen Sugar” two full years before McDormand’s speech.

DuVernay also integrated a similar approach on her Martin Luther King Jr. biopic “Selma” – when she initiallycame onto the project, her first move was to rewrite the originalscript to make sure women were included in the story. Historically, women were an integral part of the civil rights movement, but the story was told in a way that did not highlight their efforts.

While unofficial inclusion riders may have benefitted marginalized communities in some cases, there is a certain dangerin not having rules for diversity in print, particularly when the people in power don’t necessarily prioritize diversity. The most notable critic of inclusion riders was Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, who said in a recent press meeting with USA Today he would rather have filmmakers independently determine how many women and people of color they want on their project.

The fact of the matter is, Netflix has long been criticized for a lack of diversity behind the scenes. While the company features some diversity in their content – with shows such as “Dear White People” and “One Day at a Time” – their executive board is mostly white, and black and female comedians have historically been paid much less by Netflix than white male comedians. It’s hard to know exactly what the composition of Netflix sets looks like, but Hastings’comments are frustrating because they lack a sense of commitment toward tangible change.

Vague platitudes like the one Hastings made are the reason Hollywood has not achieved much in the realm of diversity.UCLA’s first Hollywood Diversity Report came out in 2014, reporting vast underrepresentation. While many were dismayed with the widely reported findings, five years later, the 2018 report found very little change, particularly in film.Written requirements would be an incredibly effective way to ensure change and would work far better than leavingimportant decisions up to the whims of the people in charge – the majority of whom are whitemales and have less of a personal stake in diversifying Hollywood.

It’s easy to perceive the concept of an inclusion rider as a quota, stifling creativity by mandatingdiversity hires without merit. However,this notion that validates underrepresentation is predicated on the idea that there is a shortage of talented people within underrepresented demographics. The reality, however, is underrepresented groups are usually underrepresented because of a lack of opportunities, whether behind the camera or in front of it.

As Rees explained, “It’s making your sets look like the world, at a minimum. And it’s not just about tokenism, it’s about talent. That’s the exciting thing. People with the ability and the ambition can have opportunities that are commensurate with who they are.”

Fighting for representation often feels frustrating and impossible. But as more peoplejoin the industry and create tangible solutions like inclusion riders, I have hope that diversity and representation will be achievable.Eventually, the industry will have no choice but to slowly improve until it becomes a mirror of the diverse society we live in.

Poll

The Undergraduate Students Association Council urged a Student Media newsmagazine member earlier this month to turn off its livestream during part of the the public comment period of its meeting. USAC's livestream policies do not allow for audio or video for a segment of its public comment periods, so as to protect the identity of students, but there are currently no regulations in place for Student Media livestreaming of council meetings. What do you think about this?
The student government should be able to restrict the public from recording its meetings, as it has the right to protect the identities of students who may face safety issues for what they say.
USAC meetings are a public forum and student journalists should be able to livestream to make this information accessible to the public.
The debate over livestreaming in USAC meetings is irrelevant, as few students watch livestreams of undergraduate student government meetings.
I have feelings about this issue that are not expressed in the options above.
Submit View results without voting »

Santa Monica Family looking for part time afternoon/evening child care for 5 yo and 3 yo. We need help driving kids to activities and playdates. Reliable car and driving record a must. Someone who can help with keeping house organized and running errands a bonus. This job would be 30 hrs per week-somewhat flexible with hours but we are looking for someone interested in a consistent job. Job to commence End of January/Beginning Feb..
[email protected]
• child care wanted

GINA RODRIGUEZ ON UCLA CAMPUS DECEMBER 13TH
Gina Rodriguez and Ford Motor Company present a discussion on breaking the glass ceiling at the Northwest Auditorium at UCLA on December 13th.
Actress, director, activist
Gina Rodriguez along with Sheryl Connelly, Futurist at Ford Motor Company, Gillian Zucker,
President of Business Operations at the LA Clippers and other top
female executives will discuss their own challenges and
victories in breaking through to the top of their professions. The panel will share their collective insights and helpful tools on
successfully navigating obstacles and opportunities facing women and underrepresented groups. The discussion will be followed by a short Q&A with the audience.
Doors: 3pm
Reception / Refreshments
Event Time: 4pm- 5:30pm
(please be seated by 3:50pm)
reserve a spot
[email protected] • Greeks