What sense does it make for a losing primary candidate to not support the winner (Your view)

If a losing candidate
for a major political position representing a certain area in South Alabama
insists on not voting for the winner in a general election, what sense does that make?

Does the loser also
desire that the voters who supported the loser remain home during the
next general election process? In other words, tens of thousands of votes
would not be cast against the opposition's party, and maybe that is one of the
reasons that the current president won the last election. Apathy does not
win elections.

And local municipal
officials should not use their elected office position to make supportive phone
calls for any candidate.

Related Stories

Columnists

Alabama prisons

Through a series of interactive workshops, people shared their concerns about crowded prisons, listed possible actions and identified costs and consequences. What emerged from this exercise are these three possible approaches.