RJ,
we confirm that we accept the proposed resolution.
Thanks,
Petr
On 19.8.2010 13:49, RJ Auburn wrote:
> Petr:
>
> We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to CCXML IR and specification.
>
> * This change has been applied to the CCXML spec and will be in the PR version of the document when we next publish.
>
> Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted.
> If you need clarifications, please feel free to let us know and we will do our best to resolve them.
>
> Best regards,
>
> RJ
>
> ---
> RJ Auburn
> CTO, Voxeo Corporation
> tel:+1-407-418-1800
> skype:zscgeek
>
>
>
> On Apr 13, 2010, at 8:53 AM, RJ Auburn wrote:
>
>> Petr:
>>
>> Good find. This is tracked as ISSUE-675. We will get that fixed.
>>
>> RJ
>>
>> ---
>> RJ Auburn
>> CTO, Voxeo Corporation
>> tel:+1-407-418-1800
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2010, at 4:59 AM, Petr Kuba wrote:
>>
>>> Hello www-voice,
>>>
>>> It looks like there has been a typo in Appendix K.3 introduced in the Candidate Recommendation.
>>>
>>> The sentence in the second paragraph below the reserved HTTP parameters list reads:
>>>
>>> For example, a parameter named "1" with a value of "1" represents
>>> an object named "a", which has a property "b" with a value of "1".
>>>
>>> The sentence should be:
>>>
>>> For example, a parameter named "a.b" with a value of "1" represents
>>> an object named "a", which has a property "b" with a value of "1".
>>>
>>> The problem is in the parameter name: it is "1" and should be "a.b".
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Petr Kuba
>>>
>>> --
>>> Petr Kuba, Project Manager
>>> OptimSys, s.r.o
>>> kuba@optimsys.cz
>>> Tel: +420 541 143 065
>>> Fax: +420 541 143 066
>>> http://www.optimsys.cz
>>>
>>