Work to make a highly-integrated view of the Universe work

Nobel research

Every Nobel laureate is a scholar and most-often a deep thinker. Yet, they do not have all the answers. What if they, like the rest of us in the world, have adopted absolute time as a fundamental frame of reference? What if that is wrong assumption and basic frame of reference? What if time is derivative and finite? What if our understanding of infinity has been thrown off by thousands of years of religious wars?

Light, space, time, mass, charge and infinity. All are fundamental frames of reference; and, what if we have understood each rather incompletely? As a result of mapping the universe within 202 base-2 notations, questions are asked. If our simple mathematical structure has some truth, we’ll also know how thrown off we’ve been since Newton’s 1687 publication of his Principia.

Complexity and Academic Silos. The continued complexity of problems in each discipline suggests incompleteness. The abundance of academic silos suggests more incompleteness. Because these 202 notations necessarily create a new paradigm to address old complexities (and these also build bridges, networks and links throughout all silos of information), our model needs to be tested and evaluated in the light of the work of our best thinkers living today.