Vox Day ‏@voxday
It's straightforward. No self-promoter advances himself by jumping on a bandwagon that everyone hates and thinks is awful.

It probably goes without saying, but it hurts me far more to have to explain something so patently obvious than to see ten thousand SJWs calling me names. But on the plus side, that's a new one for the SJWs in science fiction to cower over and whisper fearfully about. I'm not just GG, I'm militant GG. To say nothing of:

Kacho is a dumbass former GG shitlib who now spends all his time ankle-biting, whining about, and trolling GGers when he's not throwing hissy fits and trying to manipulate people and get attention with suicide threats. He actually tried to get one prominent woman in GG to show him her breasts by threatening I'm DMs to kill himself if she wouldn't.

Vox Day ‏@voxdayIt's straightforward. No self-promoter advances himself by jumping on a bandwagon that everyone hates and thinks is awful.

No fair- you didn't type slowly enough. They'll still have connect the dots between SJW Narrative -> #GG Awful, then all the way from #GG Awful -> Awful Bandwagon.That was charitable of you to think they could do all of that all by themselves.

"Why? The Internet is made out electronics and boobies. Silicon and silicone, so to speak."

Why Kacho is the creep that he is is a great mystery. Just like an SJW, I think he feels like shit (because he is shit), and tearing other people down, having control over them, and whoring for attention makes him feel less pathetic.

It totally is. That's why "Gawker Staff Smears Feces On Itself, Boards a Schoolbus Loaded With Gasoline and Napalm, Then Intentionally Drives That Schoolbus Into a Cargo Train Transporting Toxic Waste and Retarded Clowns " was declared The Headline of the Year. Each picturesque metaphor was carefully chosen to fit the facts.

On FB the other day, a guy tried to get away with saying, all moderate-like, "Well, the way they went about it was wrong BUT..." (harvesting baby parts makes the world a better place).

I told him Dr. Mengele congratulates him on his utilitarianism, but that in a civilized society of non morally retarded persons it is generally understood that you don't kill innocent people to solve your problems, nor to get stuff.

A cog broke or something, the man could hardly type his SJW tropes and truisms. The spelling was so bad I could barely cipher "Narrow minded! Rape! You want women to die!"

I interrupted his 'burn the witch' routine to say, "For the love of Charlie get yourself a spell check." He said, "I have dxslegzia you Ashole!!"

Mr. Utilitarian Dyslexic Progressive, spell check was made for THEE.

Pause and wonder!blind yourselves and stay blind!They are drunk, but not with wine;They stagger, but not with intoxicating drink.For the Lord has poured out on youThe spirit of deep sleep,And has closed your eyes (Isaiah 29:9)

One more piece of evidence to throw on the immense and growing pile which indicates their inferiority complex driven, self-promoted projections of superiority truly exist only in the tiny confines of their imaginations.

Can someone explain (with slow typing please) the little graphic dude at the end with like...a link or something? Some people have answered it's a graphic for the illiterate, but it confuses the literate like me who aren't up to speed with all the latest vacuum tube technology that makes the webernet thing work.

Even I got that. I kept looking for a trick or trap. It would be like seeing 1 + 1 = ? on a calculus test. Well, sure, I know it, but...

I hope those who are imparting SJW into society are smarter, but honestly I don't think they are. SJW just being the remnant of the communist takeover of US (and European?) academia. Violence is what the makers base power upon, and repeating of lies and crushing numbers, plus an alliance that allows for the stupid (so long as they are useful), is how they act and work.

It does make you wonder just how they got anywhere, in anything. But, here we are.

Vox you do realize most of those people are prominent GGers or at least anti-SJW.

You aren't some grand authority on Gamergate dude. A growing number in Gamergate don't even like you it seems. Instead of accusing everyone who questions you of being an SJW as if you are the deciding factor here, why don't you try actually learning about it enough to know who the people are? I know you're used to being worshipped by your brainless followers who think they're unique because they read books, the same mentality 1400-year-old special snowflakes have, doesn't mean all of Gamergate is going to fall to your whims. Especially when you call @_icze3r an SJW. Really dude?

I'm not arguing the gamergate situation. But surely when the opportunity comes up, even if only fortuitously, isn't self-promotion a natural enticement? And that's what the Hugo thing can appear to an outsider.

"Vox gamed the Hugos? And now he's got most of the nominees in-house?"

It's kind of unavoidable to try to connect it somewhat linearly, isn't it? And I guess the Tor boycott could also be framed as such also, but only much more tenuously.

Guys, just a heads-up: don't bother with Kindraness. She was hanging around r/KiA hating on Vox and slandering his positions all the time; looks like she's finally picked up the courage to come here and engage all of us vile people.

Mmmm... The amount of damage they can cause (so small), vs. the amount of pleasure they can mount... They are so little. Pretty things. You know, if you put your finger in their mouths, they will, without exception, ... Trust me on this, they have redeeming reflexes. Don't be too quick to condemn. But I am biased.

> Vox you do realize most of those people are prominent GGers or at least anti-SJW.

> You aren't some grand authority on Gamergate dude. A growing number in Gamergate don't even like you it seems. Instead of accusing everyone who questions you of being an SJW as if you are the deciding factor here, why don't you try actually learning about it enough to know who the people are? I know you're used to being worshipped by your brainless followers who think they're unique because they read books, the same mentality 1400-year-old special snowflakes have, doesn't mean all of Gamergate is going to fall to your whims. > Especially when you call @_icze3r an SJW. Really dude?

Yes there is an anewd PR push to clean up GamerGate for the greater good. Ever since SPJ the ranks are closing down and the e-celebs are heralded as something positive. It's actually about ethics now.

"Yes there is an anewd PR push to clean up GamerGate for the greater good. Ever since SPJ the ranks are closing down and the e-celebs are heralded as something positive. It's actually about ethics now."

To paraphrase Charles Babbage, I am not rightly able to apprehend the confusion of ideas that could provoke such a statement.

I also used the word stupid. A rational person could read your post wherein the only straightforward insult you use after listing a bunch of names is "SJW" and conclude you think the above people, are SJWs. Clearly your followers got that impression. This is a post that includes no SJWs but in which you bring up SJWs multiple times. Literally anyone, include your pack of dimwits, can read that and conclude you were calling them SJWs.

Funny how you don't correct the people kissing your ass. Just me. Almost like you'll happily let your followers believe you said whatever as long as they agree with you.

Also "We only use a built in reply function for intelligent people" is one of the stupidest things I've ever read. That's a non-sequitur. What does using a reply function have to do with the other persons intelligence? That sounds like a five-year-old throwing a tantrum.

Also worth noting: you didn't actually respond to the fact you keep saying you called them stupid when you never even used the word "stupid" or anything synonymous in your blog. You just dodged that.

And you know what, kindRA ness? A casual glance does equate the first group (GG people on Twitter) with the latter (SJWs). But reading it for content confirms Vox' statement that he wasn't conflating the two. Vox assumes people around here can read and think for themselves. Apparently, you can't.

You need to work on your reading comprehensions skills. As Nate pointed out, Vox didn't call them SJWs. I went back and re-read what Vox said after reading your first post and realized you came to the wrong conclusion. I suspect many others did as well.

We didn't harp on the issue, because Vox already replied to you.

We didn't ask for a clarification because we didn't need one.

That's how adults converse.

Vox called them stupid when he said they couldn't figure out what was "so patently obvious." You can't see that but you see him calling them SJWs?

As for complaining about the lack of using the reply function. Get over yourself. This isn't the first blog where people prefer to put their comments at the end rather than reply.

I also used the word stupid. A rational person could read your post wherein the only straightforward insult you use after listing a bunch of names is "SJW" and conclude you think the above people, are SJWs. Clearly your followers got that impression. This is a post that includes no SJWs but in which you bring up SJWs multiple times. Literally anyone, include your pack of dimwits, can read that and conclude you were calling them SJWs.

Funny how you don't correct the people kissing your ass. Just me. Almost like you'll happily let your followers believe you said whatever as long as they agree with you.

Also "We only use a built in reply function for intelligent people" is one of the stupidest things I've ever read. That's a non-sequitur. What does using a reply function have to do with the other persons intelligence? That sounds like a five-year-old throwing a tantrum.

Also worth noting: you didn't actually respond to the fact you keep saying you called them stupid when you never even used the word "stupid" or anything synonymous in your blog. You just dodged that.

@Kindra, you ignorant slut,We're used to trolls around here, but usually we get a better class. You too short for this ride. Aggressive stupidity, combined with lack of reading comprehension, and a nasty, churlish demeanor, combined with an inability even to provoke a response, and complaining about your inability to provoke a response. 1 point out of 7.

kindRA ness- Imagine you are in a line to order at a fast food restaurant, and you are waiting for the person in front to be done. It then becomes obvious that the loud black sow is trying to use an EBT/Foodstamp card to pay & the person at the cash register is new at the job. Assume you are a tax payer making it your cash she is spending, that is the feeling people get when they try to explain something simple.

Love it. "I implied they were stupid. But I totally didn't imply they were SJWs even though I implied that just about as much as I implied they were stupid."

Pretty sure the only reason you guys didn't join the SJW camp is they didn't give you enough attention. Elsewise you're indistuishable. Back tracking constantly. Never admit it's your problem. Huddle around and suck each others dicks and pretend like you totally have an open forum here because you have occasional shallow debates about semantics. But then call amyone who actually disagrees an enemy and start flinging insults (FYI guy above, slut does not mean what you think it means. Might wanna crack open a dictionary).

Substitute SJW for racist or sexist and you guys basically become Leigh Alexander and her followers.

Though I'm guessing you don't know who that is since evidently you guys aren't actually all that invested in GamerGate. For a bunch of "intellectuals" you guys sure do take the easiest stance. Bitch at SJWs. Don't do anything proactive or helpful. Just make fun of SJWs. Truly intelligent people can manage more than that. Even people with literal intelligence disorders can make fun of SJWs.

I believe that most of GG is composed of left leaning moderates, hence the reason so many of them mistook Internet Aristocrat's rage quit speech as an attack on capitalism, when it was an attack against fence sitting wussies who wanted to find some way we could all be friends, rather than attack, attack, attack!

See kindra, it's your arrogance combined with your ignorance that makes all those people laugh at you. It's not a shame to be stupid. Many people are. I have a mentally retarded daughter. No one laughs at her (who wants to survive the day anyway). People laugh at you because you're so very stupid and you think you're smart. You literally are unable to parse Vox's post, and you come out here to shriek at him, and when the locals point out your error, you try to claim that a perfectly clear statement that everybody here understood, everybody with an IQ above 100 and the reading comprehension skills of a 14-year-old understood, was somehow confusing and unclearly stated. Bless your heart.

And you just keep going, Like a rabid hamster, not sure what you're doing, but by God you're going to hurt us!

I'll give you a hint, dear. It's a cultural reference. Although, yes, you are a slut, that wasn't what I was saying.

Only people laughing are in the same category as the dude who couldn't even grt creative and opted to just call me a slut. Sorry if I don't respect your opinions very much. Not that I actually believe your laughing seeing as your Dear Leader "protector of free speech" muted me on Twitter but only after throwing a hissy fit in my notifications about how I was wrong wrong wrong (for the record, only an SJW would throw a fit and then mute before they could see the response. Only way he can win an argument I presume?)

And again, before Vox swooped in and said "No I didn't!" EVERYONE was taking it as these people are SJWs. People on Twitter were defending him as calling them SJWs. All of you guys clearly read it that way. You're backtracking now that he's said "Well I meant this" just so you can look like you're keeping up. It's so transparent I'm surprised you don't just up and disappear.

Technically, GG could be full of SJW types as long as they support journalistic integrity and the freedom of gamers.

In theory, but SJWs don't support "freedom" except for certain categories, and that's not one of them. Besides, such a person would quickly be excommunicated by the SJW herd for apostasy. A real SJW would never risk that, so he wouldn't join GG in the first place.

Johnny come lately TONE POLICE "you should be nicer some 14000yo black girl might be reading this & it will stop her for being a rocket surgeon"

To give you a taste of the kind of intelligence we are dealing with in some of the GG supporters who think focusing on ethics is the win condition and think themselves tactical geniuses...

>Sargon: But you are a misogyinist

>Variloh: Okay. That's fine. I don't...

>Sargon: *loud* NONONO exactly. That's my point. You got no answer to that. And that's what we

>Variloh: Cause I don't need one. I don't need an answer to that...

>Sargon:You don't think you do. But people on the...

>Variloh: No, we don't, that's the PR talking. That's how we look to the public. Sargon, we never going to look good to the public. You always going to be a misogynist.

>Sargon: It's not about looking good to the public. It's about the direct issue we are discussing at the time. If you say: "I don't like the way you think" I don't...

>Variloh: I'm not saying "I don't like the way you think"

>Sargon: No no, let me finish. If you say "I don't like you are a feminist, I don't like your feminist agenda" then they will turn around and say "But you are a misogynist". And someone from the ouside is going to like "Jesus, alright, And I'm not even interested" They don't care right. It's just not something they are going to pay attention to. They see it as a bickering slapfight on the internet "but what do I care". But if you say "You have violated a code of ethics here, that you claim to stand by" then people automatically take in interest. It's a corruption scandal then. People care about that, man. It's not about PR, it's about getting people to fucking listen.

>Variloh: That's the definition of PR. But the whole think...

>Sargon: No, it's not the definition of PR

>Variloh: Yes it is.

>Sargon: Public relations is not getting people to listen. It's about getting them to think well of you. Fuck getting them to think well of you. I just want them to listen to what's goig on.

>Variloh: Here's the thing. You say we don't have a response to that. When you claim "Oh it's about ethics" they are still going to say you're a misogynist. And people are still gonna see that.

>Sargon: Yes, they do.

>Variloh: And they still gonna think it's a slapfight because they still do.

>Sargon: But if you are talking about ethics it will gonna make them look more ridiculous.

>Variloh: Again, they are still going to say the exact same thing and the public is going to look at it in the exact same way.

Only people laughing are in the same category as the dude who couldn't even grt creative and opted to just call me a slut.That was me honey. Remember, 'reading comprehension'.

Sorry if I don't respect your opinions very much. English, do you speak it motherfucker?

Not that I actually believe your laughing seeing as your Dear Leader "protector of free speech" muted me on Twitter but only after throwing a hissy fit in my notifications about how I was wrong wrong wrong (for the record, only an SJW would throw a fit and then mute before they could see the response. Only way he can win an argument I presume?)Only way to get you to shut your dickhole, you vicious, stupid scrunt.

EVERYONE was taking it as these people are SJWs. People on Twitter were defending him as calling them SJWs. All of you guys clearly read it that way. And a bunch of people on twitter intentionally misunderstanding something is proof of what exactly?

Then why are you replying? To mock you. You are without a doubt the stupidest idiot we've had here in quite a while. It's to the point where it's funny.

Wait wait wait..."cultural reference"?You're a very special kind of stupid aren't you?

What, you don't make cultural references, or you don;t recognize it? Cause if you don't understand the idea of making a cultural reference, it's likely because of your room-temperature IQ. If you don't get the actual reference, that's because of your ignorance.

Sargon: But if you are talking about ethics it will gonna make them look more ridiculous.

Sargon doesn't understand the relationship between the enemy and the battlefield. He's like a WWII general who wants to keep reinvading Normandy. Sure, keep an occupation force there to deal with ethics in journalism, but the bulk of the troops have to move on to where the fighting is.

I believe that most of GG is composed of left leaning moderates, hence the reason so many of them mistook Internet Aristocrat's rage quit speech as an attack on capitalism

In part it was. He still refuses to monetize his youtube videos despite being really sick and needing the money. He now stopped his new channel cause his hard drive broke and he has no money to buy a new one (information about sickness and the hard drive coming from him). He has the weird "good work on the internet shall not be awarded with money" stance - and that is pretty anti-capitalist.

> I get the feeling that I would really like Sargon in person, and he's trying so hard to connect the dots, but the fence post up his arse makes it hard for him shift position.

I have the feeling Sargon is one of those IQ 105-115 type of guys Vox often talks about. The type of person who hates IQ 130+ people with the passion of a thousand exploding stars. Even if you would like him in person. As soon as he catches your face making that small smirk when he says something not so smart it's over. You know that little arrogant smile you do as a smart person when someone presents a stupid idea as revelation. It's not condescending, it is not mean, but the same moment your brain rushes through the patterns and discovers 20 holes in the idea it sends a signal to give your face an amused expression. And that small signal of superior intelligence is taken as tremendous insult.

Only people laughing are in the same category as the dude who couldn't even grt creative and opted to just call me a slut. Sorry if I don't respect your opinions very much. Not that I actually believe your laughing seeing as your Dear Leader "protector of free speech" muted me on Twitter but only after throwing a hissy fit in my notifications about how I was wrong wrong wrong (for the record, only an SJW would throw a fit and then mute before they could see the response. Only way he can win an argument I presume?)

And again, before Vox swooped in and said "No I didn't!" EVERYONE was taking it as these people are SJWs. People on Twitter were defending him as calling them SJWs. All of you guys clearly read it that way. You're backtracking now that he's said "Well I meant this" just so you can look like you're keeping up. It's so transparent I'm surprised you don't just up and disappear.

There's a certain personality type we think of when we think of an SJW, over confident and proud, excessive and unpleasant--an overweening personality.

An overweenie isn't married to a particular cause really, anything will do as long it feeds the vainglory. Prohibitionism, suffrage, obnoxious religiosity, obnoxious atheism, intellectualism, anti-intellectualism, what-evs, it's all the same.

" A growing number in Gamergate don't even like you it seems."

Yeah, nobody likes you Vox, now go stand in the corner! And take your little ilk too!

"Jane, you ignorant slut" is from Saturday Night Live sketches so old that they were still funny back then. The humor was that it was the opening rebuttal of a debate on a news channel. It was so wildly inappropriate to say on a real network news show that it was hilarious. YouTube it and listen to the peals of laughter in response.

It quickly went from being funny through absurdity to funny by familiar repetition from a beloved comic.

119. Expendable Faceless MinionAh, the years do pass, don't they? Make a reference to Cheers or MASH and the youngsters shake their heads and mutter about confused old trees. The joke is on you, though, because the years do pass, for everyone, and sooner than you can possibly expect.