Lockheed Martin

Editor’s note: If anyone is questioning this US Navy Scientist’s information, here are his credentials for verification: https://imgur.com/a/641ih

Yesterday what appears to be a legitimate atmospheric scientist in the US Navy for 10 years posted to Reddit, explaining that the massive aerosol geoengineering program people suspect is going on is in fact underway.

Geoengineering activists such as Patrick Roddie have archived the post.

He started off by explaining he held interim secret clearance from 2001 to 2003 in the US Navy as an atmospheric scientist, and then “Secret from 2003 to 2005. Then interim TS from 2005-2006, TS from 2006 to 2010,” according to his post.

He said he decided to post because he has been seeing some things come out of the climate sector that “indicate a soon to come unveiling of an ongoing program that began shortly before I started working for the Navy,”

True: the skies are openly being sprayed right now, and people such as David Keith and John Brennan are proposing that the US start spraying, as if it isn’t already happening.

The alleged whistleblower said he attended a classified climate summary in Norfolk in 2002, in which diminishing ice presence in the Arctic was discussed, and it was made clear that Earth’s magnetic field changing is the cause of global warming, not human activity.

But most importantly, he summarized info from a more intimate viewpoint that had been covered in extensive detail in books before: info about climate engineering.

The post explains:

There had already been some research done in the later part of the 20th century in testing different aerosols and their effects on manipulating weather features by seeding clouds. For instance, they had tested cloud seeding the eye of a Hurricane to try and diminish the exhaust mechanism and inhibit growth to reduce coastal impacts of large tropical systems. (it was not successful for more than a brief period). The idea was that by injecting nanoaerosols into the upper tropopause or lower stratosphere we could create a thin ice layer that would increase the albedo of the planet and slow global warming. (At that time the metals being used were not the same as what is currently being used. From what i understand they have began using aluminols instead of silver)

This is what is called “ChemTrails”. Boeing and Lockheed martin as well as Raytheon polar services began implementing these devices in commercial jets about 150-20 years ago.” (maybe he meant to say 50 years instead of 150?)

He’s of course talking about… this.

This is the exact same info that was presented by researchers such as Peter A. Kirby, from the perspective of a researcher rather than a low level insider. Entire books have been written about this.

Raytheon seems to be one of the most central “defense” contractors to climate engineering, being intimately involved with the “HAARP-type” facilities, and the energy being blasted into the stratosphere to interact with the sprayed aluminum aerosols.

The post continues:

As an atmospheric physicist I have to say, the climate engineering that is taking place is irresponsible. There are no studies on nanized aluminols and the health effects. Sure it can take decades or longer for suspended particles in the stratosphere to settle into the lower atmosphere and eventually the surface, but they WILL eventually settle! Lithometers will not remain up for ever… AND we have yet to address the real root of the problem… and we likely NEVER WILL…

here is why…

our magnetosphere is weakening in part or whole due to the increased amount of EMF that is being produced on our earth and sent out into space, or being refracted and reflected off of the sheet of injected particles for comms. EMFs cause cancer for the same reason that we are seeing these changes. Interfering phase lengths of man made EMF with naturally occurring EMFs. And they will not admit to it because it will hinder military and government comms as well as other programs that use satellite link or programs that radiate strong EM waves into space. (HAARP).

What this man is saying, is that disclosure of geoengineering is coming soon. It’s been happening for the past several years.

The CIA director came out at the Council on Foreign Relations in 2016 and called for the skies to be sprayed.

Harvard figure David Keith is pushing for the spraying of the skies.

NASA sprayed colorful toxic barium and geoengineering related metals in the sky, convincing the public to look at it like some meteor shower or natural beauty in a disgusting show of normalization earlier this year.

To really understand this issue, read some articles by Peter A. Kirby here, or his book about it here.

Though the estimated future cost of the program had previously hovered at a mind-boggling $379 billion, an updated draft that could be submitted to Congress as early as today will reportedly exceed $406 billion—a nearly 7 percent increase.

The new cost increases may come as a hit to President Donald Trump, who has bragged about his ability to get weapons manufacturers to offer the Pentagon “better deals.”

Rob Garver, national correspondent for the Fiscal Times, made the point this way:

Others simply pointed out how ridiculous it is that a weapons program so fraught with failures is allowed to receive such outlandish funding when lawmakers—mostly Republicans, but also many Democrats—continue to argue that the nation is “too broke” to increase spending on social programs that improve education or healthcare.

We got fucking liberals out here saying single-payer is impossible but remaining pretty quiet on the F-35 being a money pit.

Lockheed Martin is the biggest “winner,” most analysts agree, with some $28 billion in weapons and equipment out of the initial $110 billion going to them, and likely to get the biggest sum out of anyone else in the subsequent parts and maintenance that will bring it to a record $350 billion overall.

Others say Raytheon may be a “dark horse” for investors, with the company’s wildly expensive Patriot missile systems likely to be a substantial chunk of the Saudi purchase. Still, it’s hard to see them matching Lockheed’s sale of planes to drop more bombs on Yemen.

Still, when picking winners the situation is very much relative, as when the arms makers all belly up to the bar to get a chunk of this deal, you can bet the Trump Administration will ensure all the big ones get a taste. That’s why virtually all the big arms makers, and not just Lockheed and Raytheon, are touching record highs. Everybody’s got something coming here, and with $350 billion to go around, it can’t help but be big for them.

President Trump is eager to present the deal as good for jobs, good to the economy, and Wall Street is eager to project winners.

You don’t need a crystal ball to predict the losers, of course.

Top of the list is Yemen, and following closely behind is whomever else the Saudis decide to attack with all these costly weapons in the years that follow.

Primary Sidebar

About A Sheep No More

A Sheep No More is no longer plugged into the Matrix like the many sheep who are still programmed to believe that they have correct information provided by a varied and “independent media.” In fact the media is owned by 5 or 6 mega-media companies run by corporate advertising executives and Washington.