Homosexuals are a natural fit for the Godless, limited-population agenda of the NWO/Fascist/Marxist globalist elites

A Gay US Military? I Think Not

“The American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its diagnostic list of mental disorders in 1973, despite substantial protest. The A.P.A. was strongly motivated by the desire to reduce the effects of social oppression. However, one effect of the A.P.A.‘s action was to add psychiatric authority to gay activists’ insistence that homosexuals as a group are as healthy as heterosexuals. This has discouraged publication of research that suggests there may, in fact, be psychiatric problems associated with homosexuality.” —N.E. Whitehead, Ph.D (Link)

“...the dark side of gay life—characterized by sexual addictions and fixations—keeps stubbornly emerging, in spite of public-relations efforts to submerge it. ...How long can psychologists be in denial about the significance of the dark side, and ignore what it implies about the homosexual condition?”—Joseph Nicolosi, Ph.D (Link)

“When gay advocates reframed the public debate as a discussion about “who one is” rather than “what one does,” they successfully intimidated dissenters by casting them as personally bigoted and hateful. As a result, most people who defend the reality of male-female design have been embarrassed into public silence.” —NARTH—National Association of Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (Link)

In 1948 when Dr. Alfred Kinsey came out with “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” (popularly known as “The Kinsey Report”) it turned American sexual mores, and our culture as a whole, on its head. With his trademark white lab coat and oh-so-sincere professional air, Kinsey sold a pack of lies to us all—and we are all supposed to be okay with that. (Link)

Kinsey fudged his facts and figures and, not to put too fine a point on it, bald-faced lied to the medical community, the judicial system, and the American people. And we’re supposed to be okay with that? I am so far from okay with that, that I can’t begin to tell you. The whole thing stinks of cover-up, perversion, and treachery from top to bottom. It reeks. (Link)

Dr. Judith Reisman’s book “Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences” details how Kinsey normalized the abnormal through the use of bogus statistics. He skewed “scientific” data in order to legitimize sexual perversions—foremost homosexuality—and worked tirelessly to have all sexual legal restrictions swept aside. Kinsey was instrumental in influencing legislators, lawyers, and judges to strike down all laws restricting sexual activity. (Link)

Professor Charles Rice observes “Alfred Kinsey’s research was contrived, ideologically driven, and misleading. Any judge, legislator or other public official who [still] gives credence to that research is guilty of malpractice and dereliction of duty.” (Link)

It was largely Kinsey’s lies, coupled with Herbert Marcuse’s 1955 book “Eros and Civilisation,” that caused the “sexual revolution” in the 1960s. Marcuse’s book promoted concepts such as polymorphous perversity and the idea that pleasure is (should be) the chief aim of an enlightened life. Marcuse was a member of the Frankfurt School—the group of German Marxists who settled in at Columbia University prior to WWII. “If it feels good do it.” (Link)(Link)

Returning to the topic of the homosexual infiltration of American culture, we can trace a major influx of perversion to the promotion of Keynesian economics and homosexuality at Harvard during the first part of the 20th century. (Keynesian economics is yet another pack of Progressive lies, but we won’t go there this trip). (Link)

As Zygmund Dobbs put it in his book “Keynes at Harvard:” “Deception and trickery coupled with acid criticism of everything moral and progressive as “reactionary” is a standard fare among them. ...By persistent permeation of the centers of information, education and government the deviates have been able to invest themselves with a “Progressive” and “Liberal” cover. Actually, they are a throwback to the animal past of ancient primitive man whose sex habits operated on an infantile level.” (Link)

Homosexuals are a natural fit for the Godless, limited-population agenda of the NWO/Fascist/Marxist globalist elites—just run down a check list. Homosexuals are generally atheists—check. They are generally childless—check. Generally self-obsessed—check. Generally sexually promiscuous—check. Generally anti-family—check. Check, check, check, check, and check. “Ya’ll fit right in. Welcome aboard.” (Given the large number of gays in the government, and various leftist NGOs , I suppose the question of who’s recruiting who comes into play). (Link)

(And please, no emails about a homosexual cousin who works at a leper colony in Rwanda, and donated a kidney to feed the starving children in Bangladesh. I’m dealing with generalities here, not exceptions).

Edmund Bergler, M.D. and William Kroger, M.D. wrote in their book “Kinsey’s Myth of Female Sexuality: The Medical Facts” that “The homosexual is inwardly sick; in a convenient process of displacement he shifts the blame for his illness on the outer world. ...He is the classical injustice collector; his constant complaint is that he has been ‘unjustly treated.’” Zygmund Dobbs notes that “These attitudes make the sexual deviate a natural candidate for collectivist tyrannies.” No lie. (Link)

In one of its last-gasp acts of betrayal, the late, unlamented 111th US Congress (the historically inept, traitorous, and corrupt 111th US Congress) managed to push through the repeal of the DADT law (Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), which barred homosexuals from openly serving in the US military. (Link)

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said “a policy that requires people to lie about themselves somehow seems to me fundamentally flawed.” (Link)

What seems “fundamentally flawed” to me, is a US military policy that will legitimize and actively promote a perverted lifestyle choice that is guaranteed to disrupt, dishearten, and disgust large numbers of personnel currently serving. As O. R. Adams makes clear in his article “The Depraved Excesses of Homosexual Lifestyles,” homosexuality is anything but the “smiley face” image promoted by Hollywood and the media. Gates should read Adams’ article. Then tell us who’s lying Gates. (Link)

Dan Greenfield wrote in a recent article “the US military is being shaped…into a [politically correct] military overseen by men whose chief credential is that they share the same politics as the politicians whom they serve.” The days of Pattons and Curtis LeMays are long gone, and the US military is the poorer, and less efficient for it. The Pentagon is top-heavy with butt kissing careerists, who value political correctness and pay grades over patriotism and honor. That is not meant as an insult, but simply as a statement of fact. That must change if we are to save our military, and our country. (Link)(Link)

The changes that will result from “gaying” the US military are much larger than most people realize, or most “news” sources are telling us. The costs and confusion caused by implementing the new regulations will be huge. (Link)

Col. Richard Young (US Army Ret.), who spent 25 years as an Army chaplain notes that “for the first time in American history, virtues that are taught by chaplains will go directly against the moral message of the military. This will really muzzle how chaplains will be able to minister without facing charges of discrimination.” (Link)

What about the rights of the vast majority of personnel who are heterosexual? What about the free speech rights of Christian chaplains, or Jewish rabbis? What about the rights of those in the service who consider homosexuality to be a perversion? Where are THEIR frigging rights? Why is the US military being forced to jump through hoops and twist itself into knots in order to accommodate a miniscule percentage of the population (2%-3%)? (Link)

While we’re at it why don’t we make sure that all of the latrines and heads are multi-gender friendly: “His,” “Hers,” and “I’m Not Sure.” God forbid anyone should feel left out.

It may be that our spirits are gender neutral, as angels are said to be, but in this physical realm we are subject to natural law, and natural law says that we are separated into male and female genders, with the natural attraction of one for the other. To deny that natural bias is to follow the vain, narcissistic path of self-reflection, and to thwart, if not stifle, emotional and spiritual growth. (Link)

If we disagree with the politically correct culture-meisters we are told to shut up, or shamed and ridiculed into shutting up, or intimidated into shutting up, or forced into shutting up, or any combination of the above. “Just shut up” they tell us.

“We the people” are somewhat inured to a routine of waking up politically every four years during the Presidential elections, and then going back to sleep, politically speaking, until the next Presidential election. These days call for a radically different approach.

These days there will be no hitting the snooze alarm, and going back to sleep. These days we get up and stay up. These days we arise from our defensive, confused, or apathetic postures, and aggressively make a stand. These days we play for keeps. We will not back down, we will not be silenced, and we will not shut up.

Most Shared CFP stories

Latest American NewsEscaped prisoner considered ‘armed and dangerous’; Inova Fairfax Hospital on lockdown | U.S. Should Stop Collecting Allies Like Facebook Friends: Alliances Should Benefit America | Seattle Mayor Prohibits City Employees From Traveling to Indiana

Latest World NewsApple Bashes Indiana – But Promotes Business in Countries That Execute Gays | Facebook illegally tracks all visitors to its site even if they do not have accounts | Iranian troops advance towards Israeli border

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2014 the individual authors.