Are you ready to wake up in an America where your family is defenseless against enemies foreign or domestic? This reality is right around the corner. A day after his reelection, Barack Obama signaled the United Nations that he is ready to sign an Arms Treaty to strip you of your U.S. Second Amendment Constitutional right to bear arms.

This is not new. The United Nations made earlier attempts during the administration of former President George W. Bush. But, President Bush soundly rejected the measure. Now, President Obama, fresh off of this presidential win, feels emboldened to go forward with his design to unilaterally dismember the guaranteed constitutional protections citizens of this nation are entitled to.

Do you feel comfortable with the idea that the U.S. State Department under the control of either Ambassador Hillary Clinton will truly represent your interest? What about her possible replacement nominee, Americas United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice? This is the same Ambassador Rices who went on five television network shows to cover up the truth of what happened to four Americans murdered on 9/11 in Benghazi, Libya.

Where does that leave Americans?

The real question is what are you prepared to do in order to defend your right to defend your family? Will you wait to see what happens? Or will you take the necessary steps to make certain that you will not have to wait and see if United Nations gun control officials knock at your door, demanding, and Gun license and registration, please!

The right to control your guns is not open for debate or for negotiation. It is a sovereign right that no foreign organization, including the United Nations has the right or the authority to undertake, because a president gives the go ahead....

will you take the necessary steps to make certain that you will not have to wait and see if United Nations gun control officials knock at your door, demanding, and Gun license and registration, please!

They're out of luck. All my guns and ammo were lost in a tragic boating accident...

2
posted on 11/16/2012 5:22:11 PM PST
by Old Sarge
(We are officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet...)

Trying to seize firearms from the law-abiding public would definitely be the crisis.

Abe reminds us from "the other side."

You initiated a policy to tolerate the Marxist-Alinsky radicals and let them rant; not only has it not ceased but was constantly augmented by decades of infiltration and indoctrination. You now have two Americas. In my opinion, it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half statist and half free; I do not expect the house to fall; but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other.

I hope the military lead the hostilities.. most likely due to the separate crisis of Obama Administration scapegoating the military to a point where there are confrontations at the highest level.. leading to violence between the Obama civilians and America's military.

Let's just get it over with.. it is going to happen don't leave it for the children again(!).. enough already with the 1960s Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brat Establishment's New Normal

24
posted on 11/16/2012 5:58:18 PM PST
by WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)

I actually did drop a toy gun down an outhouse hole. Almost made me cry. And I don’t remember exactly how it happened.

As for real guns and people who don’t think they’re registered. In 1976 I bought a .357 magnum at a Western Auto Store. (I was becoming a cop.) A few months later I left the “cop business” and sold the gun to a deputy sheriff. About 2 years later I got a call from the ATF wanting to know if I still owned the gun. I told them I had sold it and they wanted to know to whom. I told them I didn’t remember his name but he was a deputy in Craighead County. I then asked if the gun had been used in the commission of a crime. They told me it had but wouldn’t tell me what type of crime. I never heard from them again. So, as soon as they got their hands on the gun they knew who had bought it and where.

I wonder if Obamagabe knows there are over 60 million armed citizens with billions of rounds of ammunition. I wonder if he’d know or realise that perhaps, maybe, the military will side with the civilians. Just wondering.

34
posted on 11/16/2012 6:11:32 PM PST
by SkyDancer
(Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church shows up at your funeral)

Obama is an evil communist dictator and has already bypassed Congress many times including with that executive order granting Amnesty and this: this is how this villain Obama will try to take our guns away using this method when it bypassed Congress to sign ACTA wich will allow the censoring of the Internet.

In signing ACTA, President Barack Obama has again leapfrogged over the U.S. Constitution, critics charge. The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) was signed by the United States and several other countries on October 1 with little fanfare. In wake of the recent uproar (and subsequent shelving) of the proposed United States bills SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act), however, many Americans are now turning their fears toward ACTA. This is not surprising, as critics say that ACTA would censor the Internet even more severely than either SOPA or PIPA would have done.

According to Forbes:

Few people have heard of ACTA but the provisions in the agreement appear quite similar to  and more expansive than  anything we saw in SOPA. Worse, the agreement spans virtually all of the countries in the developed world, including all of the EU, the United States, Switzerland and Japan.

And this treaty would trump all local and national laws. Which is part of the reason critics, constitutional scholars, and one Senator is challenging Obamas constitutional right to sign this treaty. Obama claims that he signed it as an executive agreement which does not require Congressional approval. However, everyone else categorizes it as a treaty, which does require such approval.

Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.