I call bullshit on it. First of all, Piers Morgan?.... Any article with that guys name is in your guaranteed lies are coming out of his mouth. Secondly, trump is known for saying one thing to appease the masses but doing another. Third, remember the hearing protection bill that his son has tried hard to pass? The whole article stinks.

All I got to say bout Trump. He supported the AWB, “ take guns now, due process later “ and he got bump stocks banned. So don’t put banning cans above him. Now with that aside, it may be time for those on the fence about getting a can or selling one. Now is the time to spring.

Why? Banning bump stocks didn't get him impeached. FUDDS don't care about your suppressor, a lot of states don't allow them to be used to hunt due to anti-poaching laws, etc, etc.
As far as whatever he said on Piers Morgan being a lie, whatever... there's video footage of him last week getting on Marine One on the white house grounds after the shooting in VA and the press asked him about suppressors and his answer was "I don't like them, I don't like them at all". So, just how much do you expect him to do?

Trump is not the be all end all to gun rights that people try to portray him as, he got elected under an "Anyone but Hillary" ticket from a good bit of the republican base.

Are we better off with him in office than hillary from a 2a standpoint, oh god yes, 100% better, but he's still willing to sell out your rights, after all, there's just a small percentage of gun owners who have suppressors, just like there was a small percentage of gun owners who had bumpfire stocks.

It would be extremely hard to ban them since they're already regulated and taxed, but it wouldn't be hard to get them removed from the registers for new builds, just like they did with machine guns.

Oh really? If Clinton had gotten elected, any anti-gun legislation would have been stopped dead in the Senate. If Trump wants to ban suppressors, the House will go with him (for the first time) and the Senate will line up behind him like the stooges they truly are. They aren't there to protect your rights, they are there solely to gain advantage for the wealthy, and gun rights are nothing more than the bait of the moment to blind us to their corrupt thievery.

We've got a hell of a lot more in common with the fellow citizens we're being trained to hate than the puppetmasters training us to hate them.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I can organize and sell your Commbloc weapon/parts/accessory collection
if you lack the time or desire; send a PM if interested.

I call bullshit on it. First of all, Piers Morgan?.... Any article with that guys name is in your guaranteed lies are coming out of his mouth. Secondly, trump is known for saying one thing to appease the masses but doing another. Third, remember the hearing protection bill that his son has tried hard to pass? The whole article stinks.

Did you read the article? It was not wrote by Piers Morgan. Trump said he wanted to ban suppressors in an interview with Piers. The article is from the Washington Free Beacon, not even close to a liberal site. Free Beacon got an award from The Heritage Foundation for journalism. Trump was anti-gun up until running for president in 2016. This is one of the many reasons I did not vote for Trump.

Did you read the article? It was not wrote by Piers Morgan. Trump said he wanted to ban suppressors in an interview with Piers. The article is from the Washington Free Beacon, not even close to a liberal site. Free Beacon got an award from The Heritage Foundation for journalism. Trump was anti-gun up until running for president in 2016. This is one of the many reasons I did not vote for Trump.

Yeah i read it. Like i said, trump has been known for saying things to appease the masses. Do i doubt that he said it? No, not for a minute. Do i believe it? No, not for a minute.

Antigun or not, like ive always said, you vote for the lesser of the two evils.

Oh really? If Clinton had gotten elected, any anti-gun legislation would have been stopped dead in the Senate. If Trump wants to ban suppressors, the House will go with him (for the first time) and the Senate will line up behind him like the stooges they truly are. They aren't there to protect your rights, they are there solely to gain advantage for the wealthy, and gun rights are nothing more than the bait of the moment to blind us to their corrupt thievery.

Amen brother. Trump already damaged 2nd amendment rights more than Obama did. We get barrelless kits now thanks to Bush the second, We get no FALs or HK rifles thanks to Bush the first.

And we continue to NOT have all of those options - as well as zero progress on suppressor de-reg when the opportunity was there - thanks to Trump. These rights are meaningless to him, it’s obvious that effective weapons in the hands of common men fill him with the same unease and dread as all of the mega-rich. The 2nd Amendment is nothing more than a buzzword for jerking our chains at his incessant campaign rallies.

We've got a hell of a lot more in common with the fellow citizens we're being trained to hate than the puppetmasters training us to hate them.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I can organize and sell your Commbloc weapon/parts/accessory collection
if you lack the time or desire; send a PM if interested.

And we continue to NOT have all of those options - as well as zero progress on suppressor de-reg when the opportunity was there - thanks to Trump. These rights are meaningless to him, it’s obvious that effective weapons in the hands of common men fill him with the same unease and dread as all of the mega-rich. The 2nd Amendment is nothing more than a buzzword for jerking our chains at his incessant campaign rallies.

Concealed Carry Reciprocity was not passed either. Whenever Republicans have a chance to do something they do nothing. GOP had control of the House, Senate, and White House and did zero. It is not only with guns but many other things also.