We believe this site might serve you best:

United States

Select a Different Country and Language

Promega's Cookie Policy

Our website uses functional cookies that do not collect any personal information or track your browsing activity. When you select your country, you agree that we can place these functional cookies on your device.

Related Resources

Related Articles

Abstract

We use the SAM2® Membranes (Cat.# V2861) to demonstrate the ability of in vitro translated DNA binding proteins to bind biotinylated or radiolabeled DNA probes. Binding specificity is shown with competition studies using unlabeled specific and nonspecific probes.

Natalie Betz

Promega CorporationPublication Date: 2002

Introduction

The SAM2® Biotin Capture Membranes can be used to study biotinylated molecules based on their affinity for streptavidin. The SAM2® Membranes linearly bind substrates and have low nonspecific binding. For DNA:protein binding studies, you have the option of using either biotin-labeled proteins with 32P-labeled oligos or 35S-labeled proteins with biotinylated oligos. DNA binding analysis is simple with the SAM2® Membranes. The in vitro translated protein and the appropriately labeled oligo are incubated and then an aliquot is spotted onto the Membrane. The Membrane is washed and each square is counted with a scintillation counter.

Methods

In Vitro Translation Reactions: Fifty-microliter reactions were assembled with either 500ng pSP64polyA-cjun plasmid or no DNA. Reactions were performed in the presence of no label, 2µl [35S]methionine or 1µl Transcend™ tRNA using either the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System (#TM045) or the TnT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System (#TB165).

Duplicate in vitro translation reactions were performed using Transcend™ tRNA and the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System (RRL) or the TnT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System (WGE) in the presence and absence of the pSP46polyA-cjun DNA as described in Methods. An aliquot of each expression reaction (RRL, 6µl and WGE, 10µl) was incubated with 32P-labeled AP1 Oligos in the presence and absence of unlabeled AP1 Oligos. The reactions were spotted onto SAM2® Membranes and each square was counted in a scintillation counter. The results shown are averages of the duplicates.

To test the specificity of the binding, we performed reactions in the presence of an unlabeled specific competitor (AP1 Oligo) and an unlabeled nonspecific competitor (SP1 Oligo). Both competitors were in 300-fold excess. Figure 2 shows that unlabeled SP1 Oligo is an ineffective binding competitor when compared to unlabeled AP1, demonstrating the specificity of binding detection by the SAM2® Membranes. Proteins expressed with the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation or the TnT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract Systems had similar specificities.

Figure 2. Specificity of binding of in vitro expressed proteins to 32P-labeled oligos using the SAM2® Membranes.

In vitro translation reactions were performed using the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System (RRL) or the TnT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System (WGE) in the presence and absence of the pSP46polyA-cjun DNA as described in Methods. Competition reactions were performed using an aliquot of each expression reaction (RRL, 6µl and WGE, 10µl) incubated with 32P-labeled AP1 Oligos and unlabeled AP1 (specific competitor) or SP1 Oligos (nonspecific competitor). The reactions were spotted onto SAM2® Membranes and each square was counted in a scintillation counter.

Finally, we tested the interaction between a [35S]methionine-labeled in vitro expressed c-jun protein and a biotinylated AP1 Oligo captured on SAM2® Membranes (Figure 3). Protein expressed with both the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System and the TnT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System bound the AP1 Oligo. Due to volume constraints in the binding reaction, only a threefold excess of unlabeled AP1 Oligo was used and competition with the labeled AP1 Oligo was incomplete.

Duplicate in vitro translation reactions were performed using [35S]methionine and the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation (RRL) or TNT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract (WGE) Systems in the presence and absence of the pSP46polyA-cjun DNA as described in Methods. An aliquot of each expression reaction (RRL, 6µl and WGE, 10µl) was incubated with biotinylated AP1 Oligos in the presence and absence of unlabeled AP1 Oligos (6pmol). The reactions were spotted onto SAM2® Membranes and each square was counted in a scintillation counter. The results shown are averages of the duplicates.

Conclusion

The detection of DNA binding does not require gel analysis. DNA:protein interactions can be measured using either a Transcend™-labeled protein and a 32P-labeled oligo or a 35S-labeled protein and a biotinylated oligo in conjunction with the SAM2® Membranes. SAM2® Membrane analysis is easier than gel analysis, especially if large numbers of samples will be analyzed.

Figures

Duplicate in vitro translation reactions were performed using Transcend™ tRNA and the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System (RRL) or the TnT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System (WGE) in the presence and absence of the pSP46polyA-cjun DNA as described in Methods. An aliquot of each expression reaction (RRL, 6µl and WGE, 10µl) was incubated with 32P-labeled AP1 Oligos in the presence and absence of unlabeled AP1 Oligos. The reactions were spotted onto SAM2® Membranes and each square was counted in a scintillation counter. The results shown are averages of the duplicates.

Figure 2. Specificity of binding of in vitro expressed proteins to 32P-labeled oligos using the SAM2® Membranes.

In vitro translation reactions were performed using the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System (RRL) or the TnT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract System (WGE) in the presence and absence of the pSP46polyA-cjun DNA as described in Methods. Competition reactions were performed using an aliquot of each expression reaction (RRL, 6µl and WGE, 10µl) incubated with 32P-labeled AP1 Oligos and unlabeled AP1 (specific competitor) or SP1 Oligos (nonspecific competitor). The reactions were spotted onto SAM2® Membranes and each square was counted in a scintillation counter.

Duplicate in vitro translation reactions were performed using [35S]methionine and the TnT® SP6 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation (RRL) or TNT® Coupled Wheat Germ Extract (WGE) Systems in the presence and absence of the pSP46polyA-cjun DNA as described in Methods. An aliquot of each expression reaction (RRL, 6µl and WGE, 10µl) was incubated with biotinylated AP1 Oligos in the presence and absence of unlabeled AP1 Oligos (6pmol). The reactions were spotted onto SAM2® Membranes and each square was counted in a scintillation counter. The results shown are averages of the duplicates.

Scientists at Your Service

We offer a range of services to help you succeed using Promega technologies. From product training to set up of automated systems and development of custom applications—our scientific support goes beyond the basics.