1. There's no records that Christ ever existed.2. The only ones that showed his crucifixion were proven to be forgeries.3. None of the events in the New Testament or \"Gospels\" were corroborated by historians and writers of the time.

So you're saying the fact that there's no records of Jesus' non-resurrection, just as there's no records of Jesus ressurection, proves it must've happened, rather than the sane option of - \"No it didn't\".

" Day 45: Dear diary, we killed a guy today, he didn't rise from death. Day 46: Dear diary, we killed three guys today, neither of them rose from death. Day 47: Killed one guy and a dog today. The guy appeared to rise from death, but turns out he wasn't quite gone in the first place. Day 48: We fixed the embarrasing mistake from yesterday. Day 49: Day off, killed some time, it did not rise from death."

Yeah... 'cause that totally happened. At any rate... we all know that the bible is perfect proof... yeah.

Can't we say the same for Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, Champ, etc.? I think I'll invent my own. There is a ghost ship in Boston Harbor, to rival the Flying Dutchman. If it doesn't exist, someone would have proved it and documented it. Since nobody has proved Boston Harbor isn't haunted by Nix's Mate, et al., Boston Harbor is haunted.

They....didn't record that a corpse stayed dead....because they had no reason to think that a corpse wouldn't stay dead....so the corpse must not have stayed dead...?

My head just 'sploded.

The Romans had to face the real world. And in the real world, people do not rise from the grave, except in your deistic fantasies and Altered Beast. If Jesus had risen from the dead, the Romans would have made a record of that, probably using the phrase "Holy Shiticus" to describe it. If there is no record that Jesus did not rise, it isn't because he did, but because nobody had any expectation that he would. If no record that he did rise exists, that's because HE DIDN'T!!!