xymphora

Sunday, September 15, 2019

"A False Accusation of Antisemitism from Where You Would Least Expect It" (Blankfort). More evidence of the complete crapification of the once great CounterPunch. It's comically late to be quibbling about whether or not ZOG controls the American government.

"Samantha Power on NPR’s @1A says she wishes she’d more forcefully told Obama not to go to Congress and just bomb Syria after its 2013 chemical weapons use out of concern for America’s standing in the world, which to her apparently is harmed by congress voting on wars."

"I went to @SamanthaJPower's book signing to ask about her justification for the destruction of Libya: "We could hardly expect to have a crystal ball when it came to accurately predicting outcomes”
They called security when I asked if she'd gotten hold of a crystal ball for Syria"

"RCMP intel director charged in major case was top adviser to former force head: sources". Looks like China.

Anglin has started attacking his fellow 'wingers: "Still No Statement on Why a Fed-Linked Heroin Dealer is Running TheRightStuff.Biz Security". Leading to huge counterattack from 'Hunter Wallace', who has maintained that Anglin's idiosyncrasies - the ridiculous, self-parodying, level of misogyny, for example - hurt the 'movement':

The focus is on the very odd Weev, a Jew who seems to espouse extremely 'anti-Semitic' ideas, who appears to have been released early from jail in return for 'cooperation', which may include undermining white nationalism by creating the Stormer and then forcing Anglin over-the-top (all of Anglin's extreme and ridiculous positions seem to come directly from previously stated Weev positions, and Anglin appears to have been a kind of hippie free-lance 'journalist' with no extreme positions, at least not right-wing extreme positions, only a few years ago, not to mention that his imperviousness to American legal proceedings makes it seem that he is under some sort of protection). There is a belief that Anglin was involved in tricking people into attending the intelligence op at Charlottesville (and then washing his hands of the whole thing), where the police obviously arranged things to allow for maximum violence, all to be blamed on the white nationalism, with Charlottesville now considered to be an unmitigated PR disaster by the old hands of the white nationalist groups.

We probably should be reconsidering the Swartz 'suicide', if that is what it was (and really, when you reflect on it, suicide does seem to be an extreme overreaction, even as badly as he was treated), in light of the Media Lab corruption by Epstein. The introduction of the Mega Group into the equation means the
undeniable introduction of extremely violent organized criminals who
could easily have offed Swartz and made it look like suicide (a hanging, with no suicide note). "In Epstein’s Wake: MIT Media Lab, Dirty Money, and Swartz [UPDATE]" (emptywheel, but not by Crazy Marcy). Btw, I don't think Ito is a lawyer, in fact, his whole shtick is that he is a completely uncredentialed outsider who brings people together. Swartz was a wide-ranging internet activist, and his murderers might have been motivated by any one of many things he was up to other than breaching a pay wall (!). Maybe he stumbled into something about Epstein, and was going to blow the whistle . . .

Saturday, September 14, 2019

MbS has gotten away with so many stupid, stupid things - the attack on Yemen (with this the inevitable conclusion, though I'm guessing they will blame it on Iran), continued increasing tensions with the much, much more powerful Iran (and not 'reading the room' that this is not a good long-term play and everybody else knows it), spending money the country doesn't have hand over fist, the big pivot to Zionism (the conclusion of which is Bibi's announcement of the final stealing from the Palestinians), the arresting and torturing of a lot of the other 'worthies' in the country, and the live dismemberment of Khashoggi - well, you have to figure that the King has made his decision and will forgive anything and everything, even at the expense of his own reputation and the entire country.

On the other hand, I expect to see the head of MbS on a pike within 24 hours after the death of the old and sick King.

Friday, September 13, 2019

"On 9/11, I was on a flight from Madrid, Spain to Washington, DC. I had been on a just-pre-marriage trip with a friend. We were halfway across the Atlantic when I noticed that the little plane icon on the seat TV had turned around, and was heading the wrong way. 1/"

Thursday, September 12, 2019

From 2016: "My Lunch With ‘The Spider’ Who Nearly Wrecked the CIA" (Dickey) (with the caution that Rosenbaum is a horrible Zionist, and will give you a pure Mossad spin) (my emphasis in red).

"“Admiration for the Jewish state became an obsession with Angleton, who fell captive to the magic of Israeli intelligence,” wrote Dan Raviv and Yossi Melman in their 1990 history of the Mossad, and such was the debt of gratitude felt by the Israelis that in November 1987, after Angleton’s death, Jerusalem Mayor Teddy Kollek and then-Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin dedicated a “memorial corner” of a park not far from the King David Hotel where there's an inscription in English, Hebrew and Arabic: “IN MEMORY OF A DEAR FRIEND, JAMES (JIM) ANGLETON.”

As Kollek reminisced that day, he talked about how he first met Angleton while on a tour of CIA headquarters in 1950. Minutes later, he said, he happened to bump into Philby. Amazed, he hurried back to Angleton’s office and asked him, “What is Philby doing here?”

“Kim is a good friend of ours and is the British MI6 representative in liaison with the CIA,” Angleton replied.

Kollek was stunned. As a young Austrian socialist fighting the fascists in Vienna, Kollek had known Philby very well and knew his communist sympathies. Indeed, in 1934 Kollek was one of a handful of witnesses at Philby’s marriage to Litzi Friedman, “a Jewish Communist,” he told Angleton.

Yet Angleton seems to have taken no action.

“Not telling anyone. Not putting it in the file” was “par for the course with JJA,” according to the CIA’s official historian of Angleton’s counterintelligence career (as quoted by Anthony Cave Brown in his Philby biography). Angleton was “the sort who tucked information away in his hip pocket for future use. Not telling anyone. Not putting it in the file.”

As for those long lunches with Philby, Angleton is said to have destroyed whatever records, if any, were kept.

Of the many, many writers who have tried to make sense of all this, the most intriguing, to my mind, is Ron Rosenbaum, who wrote about the Angleton-Kollek-Philby relationship in Harper’s Magazine back in 1983, four years before JJA’s death and Kollek’s public revelation.

Rosenbaum explored all the possible permutations and combinations of spy vs. spy: Angleton knowing Philby might be a Soviet mole; Philby knowing Angleton might know... Was Angleton really Philby’s dupe, or vice versa? Or were they both so deep into the pleasures of ambiguity that they “felt less loyalty to their employers of record than to the game itself”?Philby came under official suspicion in 1951, when it appeared he might have tipped off two old Cambridge buddies in his spy ring, Guy Burgess and Donald Maclean, that their covers were blown. They escaped to Moscow and Philby looked like he must be “the third man,” but nothing was proven.

This was at the height of McCarthyism in the United States, and Angleton defended Philby from suspicious American colleagues, suggesting he was the victim of a witch hunt that could damage relations with Kim’s still extensive circle of friends and supporters among the British elite.

Although Philby was removed from his previous sensitive position, he stayed on the MI6 payroll for the next dozen years, moved to Beirut, and worked as a journalist there for the Observer and The Economist. Not until Philby partially confessed, then escaped to Moscow in 1963, did Angleton admit that Philby must have been a Soviet agent all along.

But, again, Angleton must have known before that, even if somehow he’d ignored the Litzi Friedman connection for all those years. The Philby case had been “exhumed” in 1962, according to MI5 spycatcher Peter Wright, because of information supplied by a KGB major, Anatoliy Golitsyn, who defected in 1961 to the Americans —to Angleton’s shop—with information about a Soviet “ring of five” spies recruited in the 1930s in Britain. That was precisely what heated up the cold case of Burgess, Maclean, Philby, and their friends.Golitsyn was Angleton’s all time favorite Soviet defector. The KGB veteran was demanding and capricious, but had a literary and historical intellect that fascinated the poetic chief of CIA counterintelligence.Golitisyn said he had attended a meeting in 1959 with 2,000 other operatives and heard the outlines of a KGB strategy to “affect the fundamental reasoning power of the enemy.” Double agents planted deep inside the Western services were at work vetting and approving intelligence about the Russians that was in fact planted by the Russians. The Ring of Five involving Philby, which Golitsyn had exposed, was just a small part of the picture, he said. And Golitsyn warned there would be new “defectors” who would try to discredit his revelations.Thus “the monster plot” was revealed, and the decade-long disastrous mole hunt began within the CIA, turning agent against agent, analyst against analyst, and discrediting one new defector after another, some of whom were treated abominably.Angleton could see in the midst of this that everything and nothing was explained by Golitsyn's stories, all was ambiguity, but Angleton had found that overarching framework, that aesthetic, that he sought. And he clung to it until he died.Ron Rosenbaum’s most intriguing theory? The KGB, with Philby in Moscow to help after 1963, made “a conscious decision to target the mind of James Angleton.” If so, the strategy seems to have been a success. By the time I met him for that long liquid lunch, his brilliance could no longer disguise his madness."

and:

"Within the agency and the U.S. government, it was not until the shock of the 9/11 attacks that the value of “humint” once again was accepted. But the way that was played by the Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld faction of the George W. Bush administration was almost as demented as anything Angleton had conjured. Amid oracular statements about unknown unknowns, bad judgments about bad intelligence led to the disastrous Iraq war: garbage in, carnage out.

And, watching this, the man who rose from the ranks of the KGB to rule post-Soviet Russia, President Vladimir Putin, bided his time, built up his strength, and began what’s being called “hybrid warfare” to rebuild the Russian empire and discredit the United States on fronts as varied as Ukraine and Syria.

Although there are military components, the greatest triumph of Putin’s policy has been to play Washington against itself, working with it in some places, against it in others, until it sometimes appears the Americans have lost track of what side the Russians are on, and, indeed, what side they are on. We are wandering again, it would seem, in a Russian-made wilderness of mirrors."

"New York Times: Main source for anti-Russia campaign may have been a “double agent”" (Damon) (my emphasis in red):

"In a further exposure of the concocted claims of the New York Times and the Democrats of Russian “subversion” of the US political system, the Times acknowledged Tuesday that the key source used by the intelligence agencies to claim Vladimir Putin’s direct involvement “could be a double agent.”

On October 7, 2016, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said they were “confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions.”

According to this narrative, amplified by the Democratic Party and the New York Times itself, Putin personally intervened to try to get Donald Trump elected by directing the Russian state to steal incriminating emails from the Clinton campaign and release them to WikiLeaks for publication.

But this sweeping conspiracy theory, alleging a plot spanning continents involving Russia, a sovereign state, the Republican presidential nominee, and WikiLeaks, the world’s most famous dissident news organization, has fallen apart.

In August, a federal court dismissed a Democratic National Committee (DNC) civil suit against Trump, the Russian government and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Now, the main editorial outlet driving the Democrats’ anti-Russia campaign has admitted that serious concerns were raised within the US intelligence establishment about the primary source behind its hyperventilating denunciations of Russian “meddling.” The Times reported that the source, later identified by the Russian press as Oleg Smolenkov, gained an “influential position that came with access to the highest level of the Kremlin.”

Smolenkov “became one of the CIA’s most important—and highly protected—assets,” according to the Times. CNN reported that he was able to photograph documents on Putin’s desk and send them to Washington.The Times wrote: “The Moscow informant was instrumental to the CIA’s most explosive conclusion about Russia’s interference campaign: that President Vladimir V. Putin ordered and orchestrated it himself. As the American government’s best insight into the thinking of and orders from Mr. Putin, the source was also key to the CIA’s assessment that he affirmatively favored Donald J. Trump’s election and personally ordered the hacking of the Democratic National Committee.”

There was just one problem. When the United States, concerned that media reports of Russian “meddling” might compromise their asset in the Kremlin, offered to exfiltrate their spy from Russia, where he risked a life sentence or execution if caught, he at first refused, leading to the conclusion that he might be a double agent, feeding false information to the Americans on behalf of elements within the Russian state.

The Times wrote that in 2016 “the source’s rejection of the CIA’s initial offer of exfiltration prompted doubts among some counterintelligence officials. They wondered whether the informant had been turned and had become a double agent, secretly betraying his American handlers. That would almost certainly mean that some of the information the informant provided about the Russian interference campaign or Mr. Putin’s intentions would have been inaccurate.”

The Times continued, “Some operatives had other reasons to suspect the source could be a double agent, according to two former officials, but they declined to explain further.”

Ultimately, after the Times, the Washington Post and other major media outlets published reports about the unnamed source, the US exfiltrated the spy, who is now living under his real name in Washington.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Smolenkov did work for the Putin government, “but he was never a high-ranking official” and was fired two years ago.

In the name of combating “Russian meddling,” politicians pressured American technology firms to undertake the most onerous program of political censorship in the history of the internet in the US. Accounts with millions of followers were deleted overnight, while Google manipulated search results to bury left-wing viewpoints.

There was a massive effort to poison public opinion against Julian Assange, the courageous publisher and exposer of war crimes. He was slandered by the Democrats and the Times as a Russian agent who colluded with Trump, setting the stage for his imprisonment.

More information will no doubt emerge about the background and possible motivations of Smolenkov. But regardless, the fact that the source behind allegations the newspaper breathlessly proclaimed as fact had serious credibility problems makes clear that the Times made no serious efforts to question, much less validate, its chosen political narrative.

This newspaper functions as a clearinghouse for unquestioned, unexamined dispatches from within the American intelligence apparatus. Its role in promoting the Bush administration’s lies about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was not an aberration, but its modus operandi."

The funniest thing was that this was just another story in the long list of Clintonista/'journalist' attempts to embarrass Trump by suggesting that he had again harmed American security interests by blowing an intelligence operation. It raises at least the possibility that the real #Russiagate is Putin's devilish trick to undermine the US by introducing the idea that he is able to manipulate American politics in many devious ways, paralleling the way the Soviets were able to wreck the CIA by creating Angleton's destructive mole hunt through the use of a phony defector. Putin's 4D chess is really wrecking the American checker game.

Wednesday, September 11, 2019

"Lula tells world he’s back in the game from jail", "BRICS was created as a tool of attack: Lula" and "Inside story of the first Iran nuclear deal" (Escobar). Interviews with Lula, often quite hard to read. Is his making a big deal about the Holocaust (wtf?) part of Lula's bid to get out of jail, as otherwise it makes no sense. I like his comments on the purpose (and failure) of BRICS, and the relative merits (or extreme lack thereof) of Barry and Ol' Kill' (Barry overmatched, Kill' just the ultra-bitch we've come to know and love).

"The War in Eastern Ukraine May be Coming to an End but Do Any Americans Care?" (Kuzmarov).

This is by far the best thing I've read about this little spy story (more of a Washington infighting thing - more Deep State attacks on Trump - than anything else): "John Brennan's and Jim Clappers' Last Gasp? by Larry C Johnson". We do learn that the Russians have a clue, and don't leave their deepest secrets lying around.

"The Great Switch: Old Ways Fade and are Irrecoverable" (Crooke) (my emphasis in red):

". . . Iran remains a grave flash-point, but in the region it is understood
that the US neither has the political will, nor the capacity, for
protracted military action (as opposed to a quick ‘one and done’, to
which Iran has promised substantial retaliation). This sense of a
‘shift’ has been reinforced by Trump’s repeat last month of his call for
withdrawal from Syria, and by his almost indecent haste in trying to exit Afghanistan. The omens are plain: America is on its way out from the Middle East.
Gulf States need to re-position – and they are. They are repositioning into the security architecture being led by China and Russia.
Ten days ago, via a document officially approved by the United Nations,
the Russian Foreign Ministry advanced a new concept of collective security
for the Persian Gulf. The Russian initiative should be interpreted as a
sort of counterpart of, and mostly a complement to, the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization, writes Pepe Escobar.
Add to this that China is toying with giving Chinese naval protection
to its own vessels in the Gulf (from US or UK-style tanker hijacking);
and that Russia and Iran have agreed to mount joint naval exercises in
Hormuz (which will give Russia access to the Bandar-e-Bushehr and
Chabahar naval facilities), to understand that the notion of a
Russo-Chinese security architecture is assuming substance. It makes
sense for Gulf States to seek out a new protector. And they are.
So, how does this link to these other effusions of conflict? One
aspect concerns the evolution of Trump’s ‘maximum pressure’ thesis: Its
lack of any major success to date has already been widely remarked. But
the telling factor is that this ‘Art of the Deal’ approach lacks any
means to metamorphose this US maximum ‘pressure’ into any meaningful
political or strategic diplomatic path. It has attenuated down to
‘capitulate’, or we can make the pain worse. It is in short, the further
radicalisation of US exceptionalism. John Bolton formulated it thus:
“The greatest hope for freedom for mankind in history is the United
States, and therefore protecting American national interest is the
single best strategy for the world.” Or, in other words, your interests
are irrelevant to me.
What may have initiated as an Art of the Deal strategy has evolved
over time from ‘great-power rivalry’, into unabashed new ‘Cold War’. The
consequence of this ‘to the devil with yourinterests’ approach, is that most likely now, neither China, nor Iran, nor Turkey actively want a ‘deal’ with US."

and:

"The other, wider factor, accounting for this sense of a world in metamorphose precisely is the western cultural implosion, or ‘Great Switch’
(as the founder of the Rousseau Institute terms it). So little time
ago, the western liberal, cultural and economic vision was at its
apogee. It seemed inevitable. It seemed irrefutable. It stood as the
western centre of gravity. But as President Putin recently observed, (so
few years later), liberalism and the European so-called Enlightenment is viewed as ‘obsolete’
by much of the world. This quite sudden Great Shift has left the
Liberal camp – that was partying ‘on top of the World’ – distraught,
angry and apprehensive. In the polarised US and the UK, the antagonisms
are causing people to eat each other alive."

and:

"\We are indeed at a point of inflection. Some westerners may muse that
the status quo ante is somehow recoverable (if only Trump is gone, and
the ‘populists’ contained). That is delusional. The external world is
transforming. China, Russia and Asia will replace US hegemony – not with another hegemony
– but with a loose coalition of states espousing a different values and
civilizational model. And with their values differing from the
Protestant paradigm of the John Locke, John Hume and Adam Smith, they
will arrive at other economic perspectives.
And the status quo ante will not be available even domestically in
the West. For, the western party political system itself is in
irreversible transformation, too. Western politicians of all spectra are
trying to adjust to a public life in which the old world is still
around, whilst the new one is only emerging.
The post-war party political system of family and community ties to
either Centre-Left and Centre Right (with not a great difference between
the two) is dying in western democracies.The Centre-Left is expiring
because its original mission is no longer relevant to a large enough
proportion of the electorate. What is the point of parties that existed
to represent the interests of trade unions and the industrial
proletariat when mass employment in heavy industry has come to an end?
Post-industrial economies are a global phenomenon.“The popular conscience today is not exercised by the plight of great
numbers of workers being exploited by factory owners. It is more
concerned, if anything, by the prospect of factory closures. The old
Left-wing battles over working conditions and pay are largely over. The
new problem is much more subtle, and less amenable to socialist
solutions: how to maintain an industrial sector which offers large-scale
employment particularly to those with low (or no) skills. Globalisation
has a great deal to do with this, but the decline of the factory-based
economy is at the very heart of it” (as in Trump’s appeal to the
‘deplorables’ from a stance on the Nationalist-Right, rather than the
Left, strongly suggests), writes Janet Daley.So here we are at the western dilemma: The moderate forces of
Centre-Left and Centre Right are still hoping to represent the people
they always have: middle class voters who want to display their decency
by voting for a party that espouses some notion of ‘social concern’.
But, as the preoccupations of the élite, metropolitan consciousness have
turned to more specific ‘disadvantaged’ groups – ethnic minorities,
women, and gender non-conformists – the less likely it is that they will
give any regard or understanding to the everyday impact of failed mass
immigration and multiculturism on the majority (the ‘Sixty-Percent’).
And so the polarisation grows, with each group retreating into its
enclave. And the Centre Parties wane, in line with a shrinking,
economically-struggling Middle Class.Three major political forces are gathering strength in this political
environment where global warming (for the former Centrists), and
immigration (for the sixty per centers) are the new defining issues.
Nationalist right-wing parties, once marginal, are now a structural
element of Europe’s political landscapes. The Centre is struggling
everywhere, and the third force is becoming the Green movement. Its
spectacular rise – as voters reject the traditional parties and press
their leaders on the urgency to act against climate change – is mostly
attributable to a mobilisation of the young.It is this cloistered élite ‘blind spot’ of discounting the adverse
effects of globalisation on the ‘Sixty-Percenters’, in favour of
pursuing their ephemeral identity preoccupations, that has become toxic
for what remains of the old working class. Daley suggests this blind
spot “probably cost Hillary Clinton the presidency: women in the
depressed rust belt states were not worried about “glass ceilings”, they
were worried about putting food on the table and whether their men
would ever work again. What happened next? They voted, as the angry and
disenfranchised are inclined to do, for a demagogue who did not regard
them with contempt, and who gave voice to their frustration”.
The status quo ante is no longer available – even domestically – in
the West, let alone externally. The Great Switch is underway. Society
has lost its cultural centre of gravity. The old way of life is fading,
and is close to extinction."

Peak Weiss!: "For once, Sheldon Adelson needs Donald Trump more than Trump needs Adelson". Don't worry, goyim, when we steal all the land, as this will improve the prospects of BDS in Europe! Lite Zionism - you have to laugh.

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Not even the usual Washington courtesy of allowing him to resign to spend more time with his orgy. Trump was furious. Was it about the Taliban meeting? I kept wondering about this 'secret' meeting that everybody knew about. Did Bolton tip off the press, adding how terrible it was to meet with them on a 9/11 anniversary - of course, even the craziest neocon would have trouble making the case that the Taliban had anything to do with 9/11, but Washington is crazy - thus wrecking Trump's chance to be a war-ending hero (again), and also trump Barry by getting out of a war Barry couldn't?

Bolton is there because Sheldon insisted on it. Trump resisted as long as he could, but the shekels and blackmail kept piling up until he had no choice. If Bolton is gone, what did Trump have to give in return? I fear it may be the election boost to Bibi of having the US 'recognize' the settlement thefts before the Israeli election.

The fact that Valerie Plame's hubby got screwed over by (((really evil guys))) warmongering for Wars For The Jews doesn't make Valerie Plame any less of the piece of shit she obviously, and proudly, is: tweet (Walker Bragman):

"This campaign ad from former CIA agent Valerie Plame reveals how truly lost the Democrats are. Like Amy McGrath’s opening ad, it is highly produced, light on policy, but heavy on chauvinism—insight into what the strategists think voters want after 2016."

Carefully crafted to appeal to the savvy and realistic Democrats who really want to vote for this James Bond shit as long as it is 'progressive'.

"Israeli PM Claims He Discovered Iran Nuclear Site, But No Evidence Exists" (Ditz). The evidence, goyim, that it was there is that there is no evidence that it was there, just as you would expect!

"Hezbollah Will Liberate the Galilee" (Taxi). I've said this before - once the very mobile knowledge workers freak out and flee under a hail of Hezbollah rockets, that's the end of any Khazar-controlled state in the Middle East.

Oxy chic!: "Courtney Love, Infamous Former Addict, Will Not Sell Out to the Sackler Family, Manufacturers of the Opioid Crisis" (Summers). The Sacklers are obviously playing on their brand and trying to promote the beauty of the wasted junkie look. Note the comment by saltyladystrikesagain.

I told the (((JYT))) everything, and for some (((crazy reason))) (((they))) didn't publish anything about it! Tweet (Xeni Jardin):

"I told the @nytimes everything. So did whistleblowers I was in touch with inside @MIT and @Edge. They printed none of the most damning truths.

"‘The New Normal’: Trump’s ‘China Bind’ Can Be Iran’s Opportunity" (Crooke). Iran coming to the realization that Mega Group shenanigans means that the US has a terminal case of the Jews, and there is nothing to be done about it other than work around the entire country.

"Trump’s China ‘bind’ is this: A trade deal with China has long been
viewed by the White House as a major tool for ‘goosing’ the US stock
market upwards, during the crucial pre-election period. But as that is
now said to be “tough to improbable” – and as US national security
consensus metamorphoses, the consequent de-coupling, combined with
tariffs, is beginning to bite. The effects are eating away at President
Trump’s prime political asset: the public confidence in his handling of
the economy: A Quinnipiac University survey last week found
for the first time in Trump’s presidency, more voters now say the
economy is getting worse rather than better, by a 37-31 percent margin –
and by 41-37 percent, voters say the president’s policies are hurting
the economy.
This is hugely significant. If Trump is experiencing a crisis of
public confidence in respect to his assertive policies towards China,
the last thing that he needs in the run-up to an election is an oil
crisis, on top of a tariff/tech war crisis with China. A wrong move with
Iran, and global oil supplies easily can go awry. Markets would not be
happy. (So Trump’s China ‘bind’ can also be Iran’s opportunity …).
No wonder Pompeo acted with such alacrity to put a tourniquet on the
brewing ‘war’ in the Middle East, sparked by Israel’s simultaneous air
attacks last month in Iraq, inside Beirut, and in Syria (killing two
Hizbullah soldiers). It is pretty clear that Washington did not want
this ‘war’, at least not now. America, as Defense One noted,
is becoming acutely sensitive to any risks to the global financial
system from “sudden, destabilizing convulsions in the global economy”.
The recent Israeli military operations coincided with Iranian FM
Zarif’s sudden summons to Biarritz (during the G7), exacerbating fears within the Israeli Security Cabinet that Trump might meet with President Rouhani in NY at the UN General Assembly – thus threatening Netanyahu’s anti-Iran, political ‘identity’.
The fear was that Trump could begin a ‘bromance’ with the Iranian
President (on the Kim Jong Un lines). And hence the Israeli provocations
intended to stir some Iranian (over)-reaction (which never came).
Subsequently it became clear to Israel that Iran’s leadership had
absolutely no intention to meet with Trump – and the whole episode
subsided.
Trump’s Iran ‘bind’ therefore is somehow similar to his China ‘bind’:
With China, he initially wanted an easy trade achievement, but it has
proved to be ‘anything but’. With Iran, Trump wanted a razzmatazz
meeting with Rohani – even if that did not lead to a new ‘deal’ (much as
the Trump – Kim Jung Un TV spectaculars that caught the American
imagination so vividly, he may have hoped for a similar response to a
Rohani handshake, or he may have even aspired to an Oval Office
spectacular).
Trump simply cannot understand why the Iranians won’t do this, and he is peeved by the snub. Iran is unfathomable to Team Trump.
Well, maybe the Iranians just don’t want to do it. Firstly, they
don’t need to: the Iranian Rial has been recovering steadily over the
last four months and manufacturing output has steadied. China’s General
Administration of Customs (GAC) detailing the country’s oil imports data
shows that China has not cut its Iranian supply after the US waiver
program ended on 2 May, but rather, it has steadily increased Iranian crude imports since
the official end of the waiver extension, up from May and June levels.
The new GAC data shows China imported over 900,000 barrels per day (bpd)
of crude oil from Iran in July, which is up 4.7% from the month before.
And a new path is opening in front of Iran. After Biarritz, Zarif flew directly to Beijing where he discussed a huge, multi-hundred billion (according to one report),
twenty-five-year oil and gas investment, (and a separate) ‘Road and
Belt’ transport plan. Though the details are not disclosed, it is plain
that China – unlike America – sees Iran as a key future strategic
partner, and China seems perfectly able to fathom out the Iranians, too."

More evidence that France the Rothschild family has decided to split with the WWIII American machers: "France Says Time Has Come To Ease Tensions With Russia".

Tweets by Patrick Porter on the complete moral derangement of (((Anne Applebaum))). The people who are always wrong about everything are bizarrely certain of themselves!

Trump managed to get out of his Poland trip too!: "Explainer: Donald Trump's Decision to Cancel 'Secret' Talks With the Taliban" (Joshi):

"Just why Trump decided to pull out at the last minute is not clear.
But it is not an unusual action on his part. Consider his recent
decision to cancel his visit to Denmark,
because the country refused to discuss the sale of Greenland. He later
also cancelled an important visit to Poland that was part of the
European tour to Copenhagen, because he said he had to monitor Hurricane
Dorian whose limits he had fudged with a pen.
Maybe the penny finally dropped about the proximity of the talks with
the 9/11 anniversary. A Taliban delegation in Camp David, along with
the death of the US soldier in Afghanistan, may have been taken badly by
his own nationalistic base. On the other hand, however, it could be
that Trump finally realised that the Taliban refusal to stop its
violence was, indeed, giving it leverage in the situation. The Taliban,
though, insists that it is not under any obligation to stop attacks
unless there is a full ceasefire in place. And it will not agree to a
ceasefire till all the foreign forces have pulled out."

The consistent Assholian problem - see also, Iran - is that the US never gives up anything, yet the other side in proposed negotiations is always expected to make the most major concessions - complete capitulation - just to be allowed to get to the negotiating table. One dead American soldier, yet the Assholes get to consistently kill Afghans, both civilian and military, with impunity.

The latest Webb finally makes it to Unz. I was wondering if wild speculations about the Khazars murdering JFK was fine as nobody would take it seriously, but Webb's talk of pre-crime and the Khazar gangsters was maybe getting dangerously close to the truth, but Unz came through. We really need to reconsider the Stephen Paddock mass shooting at a macher-owned casino in light of what we know about American politics. Paddock seemed to think he was going to walk out the door without consequences, which seems crazy unless he had reason to believe he would have inside help from the casino (see also: how did he get all those guns to his room?).

"Mind Blowing Epstein Related Facts You Haven't Heard" (Amazing Polly video). In-Q-Tel; the tech companies of the Maxwell sisters, husbands and ex-husbands thereof, and their circles (Edge.org, Santa Fe Institute, Gell-Mann, who died in May, Bronfmans); the weird rise of Carly Fiorina, Vicky Ward, Swartz's 'hack' of Media Lab, 'Leonardo', and Jack Parsons (!) (at which point she starts guessing and the video goes off the rails). The Mega Group conspiracy is even worse than you thought! Iran is right not to fall into the trap of engaging with it.

It is quite something to call 'replacement theory' an 'anti-Semitic' myth of the 'deplorables', while simultaneously calling its results a 'thrilling prediction'. Also: "NYT columnist discloses 'insomnia' she's had since 'cursed night' of Trump's election" (Dorman).

Btw, here's a video of the US government under Mega Group control. Not an attractive look.

Sunday, September 08, 2019

"How an elite university research center concealed its relationship with a sex offender—documents show MIT Media Lab accepted donations directed by Jeffrey Epstein far in excess of what the university has admitted to, and worked to cover it up:"

"How an Élite University Research Center Concealed Its Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein" (Farrow) (that title actually has an accent aigu on the e in the title, probably appropriate for the levels of elitism in the 'research center'!). You have to love how Epstein rubbed their faces in it, almost as if he knew how this would look when the whole edifice came tumbling down!:

"In 2015, as Epstein’s visit drew near, Cohen instructed his staff to insure that Zuckerman, if he unexpectedly arrived while Epstein was present, be kept away from the glass-walled office in which Epstein would be conducting meetings. According to Swenson, Ito had informed Cohen that Epstein “never goes into any room without his two female ‘assistants,’ ” whom he wanted to bring to the meeting at the Media Lab. Swenson objected to this, too, and it was decided that the assistants would be allowed to accompany Epstein but would wait outside the meeting room.

On the day of the visit, Swenson’s distress deepened at the sight of the young women. “They were models. Eastern European, definitely,” she told me. Among the lab’s staff, she said, “all of us women made it a point to be super nice to them. We literally had a conversation about how, on the off chance that they’re not there by choice, we could maybe help them.”"

They are so powerful they believed they could wait for the attention to subside and escape any consequences, but no: "U.S. news MIT Media Lab director resigns after criticism over financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein" (Rosenblatt).

Saturday, September 07, 2019

"How the CIA, Mossad and “the Epstein Network” are exploiting mass shootings to create an Orwellian nightmare" (Webb) (note in particular how useful these mass shootings are for the (((conspirators))), and the fact that the 'pre-crime' surveillance has done absolutely nothing to stop mass shootings, except for some obvious patsies 'swooped' to make it look like law enforcement is successfully using its new mass surveillance capabilities):

". . . whatever technological solution is adopted by the Trump
administration, it is set to use a controversial database first
developed as part of a secretive U.S. government program that involved
notorious Iran-Contra figures like Oliver North as a means of tracking
and flagging potential American dissidents for increased surveillance
and detention in the event of a vaguely defined “national emergency.”
As this report will reveal, this database — often referred to as
“Main Core” — was created with the involvement of Israeli intelligence
and Israel remained involved years after it was developed, and
potentially to the present. It was also used by at least one former CIA
official on President Reagan’s National Security Council to blackmail
members of Congress, Congressional staffers and journalists, among
others.
Given recent reports
on the Trump administration’s plan to create a new government agency to
use “advanced technology” to identify “neurobehavioral signs” of
“someone headed toward a violent explosive act” using data collected by
consumer electronic devices, the picture painted by the technology
currently being promoted and implemented under the guise of “keeping
Americans safe” is deeply Orwellian. In fact, it points directly to the
genesis of a far-reaching surveillance state far more extensive than
anything yet seen in American history and it is being jointly developed
by individuals connected to both American and Israeli intelligence.
Carbyne911, which will be referred to simply as Carbyne in this
report, is an Israeli tech-startup that promises to revolutionize how
calls are handled by emergency service providers, as well as by
governments, corporations and educational institutions. Not long after
it was founded in 2014 by veterans of Israeli military intelligence,
Carbyne began to be specifically marketed
as a solution to mass shootings in the United States that goes “beyond
the gun debate” and improves the “intelligence that armed emergency
responders receive before entering an armed shooter situation” by
providing video-streaming and acoustic input from civilian smartphones
and other devices connected to the Carbyne network.
Prior to Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest in July, Carbyne had been receiving high praise from U.S. and Israeli media, with Fox News hailing the company’s services as the answer to the U.S.’ “aging 911 systems” and the Jerusalem Post writing that the company’s platform offers “hi-tech protection to social workers and school principals.” Other reports claimed that Carbyne’s services result in “a 65% reduction in time-to-dispatch.”
Carbyne’s call-handling/crisis management platform has already been
implemented in several U.S. counties and the company has offices not
only in the U.S. but also in Mexico, Ukraine and Israel. Carbyne’s
expansion to more emergency service provider networks in the U.S. is
likely, given that federal legislation seeks to offer grants to upgrade
911 call centers throughout the country with the very technology of
which Carbyne is the leading provider. One of the main lobby groups
promoting this legislation, the National Emergency Number Association
(NENA), has a “strong relationship” with Carbyne, according to Carbyne’s website. In addition, Carbyne has also begun marketing its platform for non-emergency calls to governments, educational institutions and corporations.
Yet, what seemed like the inevitability of Carbyne’s widespread
adoption in the U.S. hit a snag following the recent arrest and
subsequent death of sex trafficker and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who
exploited underage girls for the purpose of obtaining “blackmail” on the
rich and poweful, an operation that had clear ties to intelligence.
Epstein, after his first arrest and light sentence for soliciting sex
from a minor in 2007, was tapped by former Israeli Prime Minister and
former head of Israeli military intelligence Ehud Barak, to become a key
financial backer of Carbyne.
As a result of increased scrutiny of Epstein’s business activities
and his ties to Israel, particularly to Barak, Epstein’s connection to
Carbyne was revealed and extensively reported on by the independent
media outlet Narativ, whose exposé on
Carbyne revealed not only some of the key intelligence connections of
the start-up company but also how the architecture of Carbyne’s product
itself raises “serious privacy concerns.”MintPress detailed many of Carbyne’s main intelligence connections in Part III of the investigative series “Inside the Jeffrey Epstein Scandal: Too Big to Fail.”
In addition to Barak — former Israeli prime minister and former head of
Israeli military intelligence — serving as Carbyne’s chairman and a key
financer, the company’s executive team are all former members of
Israeli intelligence, including the elite military intelligence unit,
Unit 8200, which is often compared to the U.S. National Security Agency
(NSA).
Carbyne’s current CEO, Amir Elichai, served in Unit 8200 and tapped former Unit 8200 commander and current board member of AIPAC Pinchas Buchris to serve as the company’s director and on its board. In addition to Elichai, another Carbyne co-founder, Lital Leshem,
also served in Unit 8200 and later worked for Israeli private spy
company Black Cube. The only Carbyne co-founder that didn’t serve in
Unit 8200 is Alex Dizengof, who previously worked for Israel’s Prime Minister’s office.
As MintPress noted in a past report
detailing Israeli military intelligence’s deep ties to American tech
giant Microsoft, Unit 8200 is an elite unit of the Israeli Intelligence
corps that is part of the IDF’s Directorate of Military Intelligence and
is involved mainly in signal intelligence (i.e., surveillance),
cyberwarfare and code decryption. It is frequently described as the
Israeli equivalent of the NSA and Peter Roberts, senior research fellow
at Britain’s Royal United Services Institute, characterized the unit in an interview with the Financial Times
as “probably the foremost technical intelligence agency in the world
and stand[ing] on a par with the NSA in everything except scale.”
Notably, the NSA and Unit 8200 have collaborated on numerous projects, most infamously on the Stuxnet virus as well as the Duqu malware. In addition, the NSA is known to work with veterans of Unit 8200 in the private sector, such as when the NSA hired two Israeli companies,
to create backdoors into all the major U.S. telecommunications systems
and major tech companies, including Facebook, Microsoft and Google. Both
of those companies, Verint and Narus, have top executives with ties to
Israeli intelligence and one of those companies, Verint (formerly
Comverse Infosys), has a history of aggressively spying on U.S. government facilities. Unit 8200 is also known for spying
on civilians in the occupied Palestinian territories for “coercion
purposes” — i.e., gathering info for blackmail — and also for spying on Palestinian-Americans via an intelligence-sharing agreement with the NSA.
Unlike many other Unit 8200-linked start-ups, Carbyne also boasts
several tie-ins to the Trump administration, including Palantir founder
and Trump ally Peter Thiel — another investor in Carbyne. In addition, Carbyne’s board of advisers
includes former Palantir employee Trae Stephens, who was a member of
the Trump transition team, as well as former Secretary of Homeland
Security Michael Chertoff. Trump donor and New York real-estate developer Eliot Tawill is also on Carbyne’s board, alongside Ehud Barak and Pinchas Buchris.
Yet, privacy concerns with Carbyne go beyond the company’s ties to
Israeli intelligence and U.S. intelligence contractors like Peter Thiel.
For instance, Carbyne’s smartphone app extracts the following information from the phones on which it is installed:

Device location, video live-streamed from the smartphone to the call center, text messages in a two-way chat window, any data from a user’s phone if they have the Carbyne app and ESInet, and any information that comes over a data link, which Carbyne opens in case the caller’s voice link drops out.” (emphasis added)

According to Carbyne’s website,
this same information can also be obtained from any smartphone, even if
it does not have Carbyne’s app installed, if that phone calls a 911
call center that uses Carbyne or merely any other number connected to
Carbyne’s network."

and (it appears Barak was removed from partisan politics in Israel as the machers saw him as more useful as a ringleader of the Khazar total surveillance/total blackmail project):

"One of Carbyne’s clearest connections to Israeli intelligence is
through its chairman and one of its funders, Ehud Barak. Though Barak is
best known for being a former prime minister of Israel, he is also a
former minister of defense and the former head of Israeli military
intelligence. He oversaw Unit 8200’s operations, as well as other units
of Israeli military intelligence, in all three of those positions. For
most of his military and later political career, Barak has been closely associated with covert operations.
Prior to the public scrutiny of Barak’s relationship to Jeffrey
Epstein, following the latter’s arrest this past July and subsequent
death, Barak had come under fire for his ties to disgraced film mogul
Harvey Weinstein. Indeed, it was Ehud Barak who put Weinstein in contact with
the Israeli private intelligence outfit Black Cube, which employs
former Mossad agents and Israeli military intelligence operatives, as
Weinstein sought to intimidate the women who had accused him of sexual
assault and sexual harassment. Former Mossad director Meir Dagan led
Black Cube’s board until his death in 2016 and Carbyne co-founder Lital
Leshem is Black Cube’s former director of marketing.
After Barak put him in contact with Black Cube’s leadership, Weinstein, according to The New Yorker,
used the private spy firm to “‘target,’ or collect information on,
dozens of individuals, and compile psychological profiles that sometimes
focused on their personal or sexual histories.” In addition, The New Yorker
noted that “Weinstein monitored the progress of the investigations
personally” and “also enlisted former employees from his film
enterprises to join in the effort, collecting names and placing calls
that, according to some sources who received them, felt intimidating.”
Yet, more recently, it has been Barak’s close relationship to Epstein that has raised eyebrows and opened him up to political attacks from his rivals.
Epstein and Barak were first introduced by former Israeli Prime
Minister Shimon Peres in 2002, a time when Epstein’s pedophile blackmail
and sex trafficking operation was in full swing.
Barak was a frequent visitor to Epstein’s residences in New York, so often that The Daily Beast
reported that numerous residents of an apartment building linked to
Epstein “had seen Barak in the building multiple times over the last few
years, and nearly half a dozen more described running into his security
detail,” adding that “the building is majority-owned by Epstein’s
younger brother, Mark, and has been tied to the financier’s alleged New
York trafficking ring.” Specifically, several apartments in the building
were “being used to house underage girls from South America, Europe and
the former Soviet Union,” according to a former bookkeeper employed by one of Epstein’s main procurers of underage girls, Jean Luc Brunel.
Barak is also known to have spent the night at one of Epstein’s
residences at least once, was photographed leaving Epstein’s residence
as recently as 2016, and has admitted to visiting Epstein’s island,
which has sported nicknames including “Pedo Island,” “Lolita Island” and
“Orgy Island.” In 2004, Barak received $2.5 million
from Leslie Wexner’s Wexner Foundation, where Epstein was a trustee as
well as one of the foundation’s top donors, officially for unspecified
“consulting services” and “research” on the foundation’s behalf.
In 2015, Barak formed a limited partnership company in Israel for the
explicit purpose of investing in Carbyne (then known as Reporty) and
invested millions of dollars in the company, quickly becoming a major
shareholder and subsequently the company’s public face and the chairman
of its board. At least $1 million
of the money invested in this Barak-created company that was later used
to invest in Carbyne came from the Southern Trust Company, which was owned by Jeffrey Epstein."

and (so much for Rogers being a patriot!):

"The reason Carybne’s partnerships with Cisco Systems and Google are
significant lies in the role that Cisco and former Google CEO Eric
Schmidt have played in the creation of a controversial “incubator” for
Israeli tech start-ups with deep ties to Israeli military intelligence,
American neoconservative donor Paul Singer, and the U.S.’ National
Security Agency (NSA).
This company, called Team8, is an Israeli company-creation platform whose CEO and co-founder
is Nadav Zafrir, former commander of Unit 8200. Two of the company’s
other three co-founders are also “alumni” of Unit 8200. Among Team8’s top investors is Schmidt, the former CEO of Google, who also joined Peter Thiel in funding the Unit 8200-linked BillGuard, as well as major tech companies including Cisco Systems and Microsoft.
Last year, Team8 controversially hired
the former head of the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command, Retired Admiral Mike
Rogers, and Zafrir stated that his interest in hiring Rogers was that
Rogers would be “instrumental in helping strategize” Team8’s expansion
in the United States. Jake Williams, a veteran of NSA’s Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) hacking unit, told CyberScoop:

Rogers is not being brought into this role because of his
technical experience. … It’s purely because of his knowledge of
classified operations and his ability to influence many in the U.S.
government and private-sector contractors.”

Team8 has also been heavily promoted by Start-Up Nation Central (SUNC). SUNC prominently features Team8 and Zafrir on the cybersecurity section of its website and also sponsored a talk
by Zafrir and an Israeli government economist at the World Economic
Forum, often referred to as “Davos,” that was attended personally by
Paul Singer.
SUNC itself has deep ties to Israeli military intelligence, with
former Unit 8200 officer Raphael Ouzan serving on its board of
directors. Another example of SUNC-Unit 8200 ties can be seen with Inbal Arieli,
who served as SUNC’s Vice President of Strategic Partnerships from 2014
to 2017 and continues to serve as a senior adviser to the organization.
Arieli, a former lieutenant in Unit 8200, is the founder and head of
the 8200 Entrepreneurship and Innovation Support Program (EISP), which
was the first start-up accelerator in Israel aimed at harnessing “the
vast network and entrepreneurial DNA of [Unit] 8200 alumni” and is
currently one of the top company accelerators in Israel, alongside
Team8. Arieli was the top executive at 8200 EISP while working at SUNC
and several other top SUNC staffers are also connected to Israeli
military intelligence.
Thus, Google and Cisco’s connections to Team8 suggests that their
partnerships with another Israeli military intelligence-connected firm
like Carbyne is a deepening of those two companies’ links to the growing
bi-national security state that is uniting key players in the U.S.
military-industrial complex and Israeli intelligence."

and (note the fact that the Palestinians have been used as the guinea pigs for testing this mass surveillance/coercion system):

"It’s not exactly clear why Israel’s military intelligence and other
intelligence agencies decided to begin outsourcing its operations in
2012, though Calcalist Tech suggests the reasoning was related to
the difference in wages between the private sector and the public
sector, with pay being much higher in the former. However, it is notable
that 2012 was also the year that Paul Singer — together with
Netanyahu’s long-time economic adviser and former chair of the Israeli
National Economic Council, Eugene Kandel — decided to create Start-Up Nation Central.
As MintPress noted
earlier this year, SUNC was founded as part of a deliberate Israeli
government effort to counter the nonviolent Boycott, Divest and
Sanctions (BDS) movement and to make Israel the dominant global “cyber
power.” This policy is aimed at increasing Israel’s diplomatic power and specifically undermining
BDS as well as the United Nations, which has repeatedly condemned
Israel’s government for war crimes and violations of international law
in relation to the Palestinians.
Last year, Netanyahu was asked by Fox News host
Mark Levin whether the large growth seen in recent years in Israel’s
technology sector, specifically tech start-ups, was part of Netanyahu’s
plan. Netanyahu responded, “That’s very much my plan … It’s a very
deliberate policy.” He later added that “Israel had technology because
the military, especially military intelligence, produced a lot of
capabilities. These incredibly gifted young men and women who come out
of the military or the Mossad, they want to start their start-ups.”
Netanyahu again outlined
this policy at the 2019 Cybertech Conference in Tel Aviv, where he
stated that Israel’s emergence as one of the top five “cyber powers” had
“required allowing this combination of military intelligence, academia
and industry to converge in one place” and that this further required
allowing “our graduates of our military and intelligence units to merge
into companies with local partners and foreign partners.”
The direct tie-ins of SUNC to Israel’s government and the successful
effort led by SUNC and other companies and organizations to place former
military intelligence and intelligence operatives in strategic
positions in major multinational technology companies reveal that this
“deliberate policy” has had a major and undeniable impact on the global
tech industry, especially in Silicon Valley.
This “deliberate policy” of Netanyahu’s also recently resulted in the
creation of a Mossad-run venture capital fund that is specifically
focused on financing Israeli tech start-ups. The venture capital fund,
called Libertad, was first announced by Israel’s Prime Minister’s Office and was created with the explicit purpose
of “increasing the Israeli intelligence agency’s knowledge base and
fostering collaboration with Israel’s vibrant startup scene” It was modeled after
the CIA’s venture capital fund In-Q-Tel, which invested in several
Silicon Valley companies turned government and intelligence contractors —
including Google and Palantir — with a similar goal in mind.
Libertad declines to reveal the recipients of its funding, but
announced last December that it had chosen five companies in the fields
of robotics, energy, encryption, web intelligence, and natural language
processing and text analysis. In regard to its interest in web
intelligence, a Mossad employee told the Jerusalem Post that the intelligence agency was specifically interested in “innovative technologies for [the] automatic identification of personality characteristics – personality profiling – based on online behavior and activity, using methods based on statistics, machine learning, and other areas.” (emphasis added)
According to Libertad’s website,
in return for its investment, now set at NIS 2 million (~$580,000) per
year per company, “the Mossad will receive access to the IP [initial
product] developed during R&D [Research and Development] while under
contract, and a non-commercial, non-exclusive license to use it.
Libertad’s contract with the company will not provide it with any
additional rights.” In an interview with Calcalist Tech,
Mossad Director Yossi Cohen told the paper that the Mossad’s
partnership with civilian companies in Israel is “excellent” and that
the agency will continue to strengthen those ties.
Israeli intelligence has a documented history in placing “backdoors”
into technology products for the purpose of surveillance, with one
well-known case being Israel’s repurposing of the PROMIS software,
discussed in Part III of MintPress’
series on Jeffrey Epstein. Furthermore, given that U.S. intelligence,
specifically the NSA, had “backdoors” placed into the products of major
Silicon Valley companies (a service performed by Israeli
intelligence-linked tech companies no less), Mossad may very well plan
on doing the same with the technology products of companies it backs
through Libertad.
Tim Shorrock, investigative journalist and author of Spies For Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing, told MintPress
that the Mossad’s continuation of such practices through Libertad was
definitely plausible, especially given what Shorrock described as the
“unusual” choice of Libertad choosing not to release the identities of
the companies in which it invests.
“The Mossad is trying to hide what they are investing in,” Shorrock
stated, adding that Libertad’s secrecy “raises a lot of questions”
particularly given that it was modeled after the CIA’s In-Q-Tel.
Shorrock noted that In-Q-Tel and other venture capital funds with ties
to U.S. intelligence or the U.S. military rarely, if ever, hide the
identities of the companies they finance.
However, Libertad is merely the latest and most public expression of
the Mossad’s interest in Israeli tech start-ups, the lion’s share of
which are created by veterans of Unit 8200 or other Israeli intelligence
agencies. Indeed, former Mossad Director Tamir Pardo stated in 2017
that “everyone” in the Israeli cybertechnology sector is an “alumni” of
either Israeli intelligence, like the Mossad, or Israeli military
intelligence, like Unit 8200. Pardo even went as far as to say that the
Mossad itself is “like a start-up.”
Pardo himself, after leaving his post as Mossad director in 2016,
dove straight into the world of Israeli tech start-ups, becoming chairman of Sepio Systems, whose two CEOs are former Unit 8200 officers. Sepio Systems’ advisory board
includes the former chief information security officer of the CIA,
Robert Bigman; former member of the U.S. Military’s Joint Special
Operations Command (JSOC), Geoff Hancock; and former head of the Israel
National Cyber Bureau and veteran of Israeli military intelligence, Rami
Efrati. Sepio Systems’ cybersecurity software has been adopted by several banks, telecom and insurance companies, including in the U.S. and Brazil.
Pardo is not the only prominent figure in Israel’s intelligence
community to compare Israeli intelligence agencies to tech start-ups.
Shin Bet Director Nadav Argaman described Israel’s domestic spy agency
in similar terms. “The Shin Bet is like an evolving start-up, with
unmatched strength,” Argaman stated
in a June 2017 speech, as he extolled the agency’s use of “pre-crime”
technology to detain Palestinians based on their social media activity.
Argaman, at the time, claimed that more than 2,000 Palestinians, whom
he described as “potential lone-wolf terrorists,” had been arrested as a
result of these “breakthrough technological advances” that use
artificial-intelligence algorithms to monitor the social media accounts
of Palestinians, especially younger Palestinians, for the use of
“tripwire” phrases that have been used by Palestinians who later
committed acts of violence. In the case of those who use such terms,
“their phones are tracked to see if they meet other suspects, or leave
their districts to move towards potential Israeli targets. In such
cases, security forces detain the suspect,” according to a 2017 report on the practice by The Economist."

The good thing is that this has all happened very quickly, and with a massive response, can be dismantled rather quickly. It's all high treason, and a mass rounding up of Silicon Valley and mass incarceration would end the problem (along, of course, with the absolutely essential move of removing Khazar political control from Israel). The bad thing is that the success of the mass blackmail operation means there is no political will whatsoever to deal with the problem. As bad as things are now, get ready for everything to get much worse. The systematic and all-encompassing nature of the Khazar Corruption System means that it is becoming impossible to see how change is possible without revolution.

You have to give the Khazars credit. The mass militarism in American society, caused by all the Wars For The Jews and the (((media))) and (((entertainment))) industries, coupled with the mass suffering caused to the lower class whites, has led to the mass shooting phenomenon, which in turn provides the excuse, under the guise of 'public safety', to create a mass surveillance/mass blackmailing operation which will enable yet even more Wars For The Jews, and further Khazar parasitism of the American high tech industries, and on, and on, and on.

All I can say is, if we ever get truly woke and actually decide to fix
things, Operation Judenrein is going to have to be absolutely massive.
It might be easier to just build a wall around Silicon Valley, and lock
the doors. You really have to laugh at the normies who say everything
is fine and any complaining is an 'anti-Semitic' overreaction.

Friday, September 06, 2019

"‘NYT’ says Netanyahu influences US Iran policy because of his feel for ‘US public opinion’ (and never mentions Adelsons)" (Weiss). Not to mention Epstein! See also: "‘Miriam Adelson: Sara Netanyahu said it would be my fault if Iran nuked Israel’" (the point to take from this isn't the squabbling but the micromanaging by Mrs Bibi).

Speaking of not mentioning something, here's Weiss musing about the dead Gelb and the 'blob'/Deep State, missing out the obvious fact - and the only relevant factor in his life of machinations - that Gelb was a Khazar ("Having grown up in an insular Jewish family of parents who operated a small delicatessen in suburban New York, he was discovered at Harvard by Prof. Henry A. Kissinger . . . " - note he was also deeply involved in the Khazar change-the-subject plot known as the Pentagon Papers)!!!: "Les Gelb is dead, long live the blob".

"The brief hearing before U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly completed a stunning turn of events for Schock and cemented a deal virtually unheard of in a high-profile corruption case." Chicago is always reliably hilariously corrupt.

Yinon: "How the U.S. Shattered the Middle East" (Sjursen). Exactly as (((they))) intended, and put in place by way of the gangster Mega Group blackmail operations.

"The high-speed hard sell: why the F-35 is coming to a Canadian air show" (Brewster). There's no chance Trudeau - probably as PM in a minority government - won't pick the Widow/Widower Maker.

"Jewish Texas 7 member says judge who sent him to death row is anti-Semitic, asks for new trial" (Emily). As far as I can see, there is no evidence for these alleged slurs, but I find it impossible to conceive that, in this day and age, farm animals will be allowed to execute a Chosen One.

"The
romantic ideal of love as a mystical encounter with the eternal
feminine, or the Goddess, has had a very profound influence on European
culture. Naturally, an ideal is never fully attained. Perhaps it is only
approached by a blessed few, an aristocracy of love. Yet it glitters in
the sky for all to see, and it attracts like a magnet the collective
soul. Certainly, the ideal is the source of much disillusion and
suffering, as De Rougemont insisted and as the romantic poets knew. But,
as Byron said, “sorrow is knowledge.”

Conversely,
the absence of ideality in relationship to love in the Hebrew tradition
has had a profound influence on the Jewish mind. The main reason why
romanticism is foreign to Jewish culture is that there can be no truly
romantic conception of love without faith in the immortality of the
soul, and Jewish anthropology is fundamentally materialistic (read my article “Israel as One Man”).
It is therefore no surprise that romanticism has been regarded with
contempt by most Jewish intellectuals. Moses Hess judged it “decadent,”
preferring Jewish novels, since “the Jews alone had the good sense to
subordinate sexual to maternal love.”[15] He admits, however, that Jewish writers are perfectly capable of imitating romanticism, like anything else.

The
enthusiasm of the Jewish cultural elites for Freud’s theory may be seen
in the light of this “clash of cultures”. Kevin MacDonald (A Culture of Critique, ch. 4)
explains it by an inherited Jewish culture where love was seen “as an
invention of the alien gentile culture and thus morally suspect.”[16]
Otto Rank’s idea that Jews had a more primitive, and therefore
healthier sexuality (“The Essence of Judaism,” 1905) was widely shared
among Freud’s disciples. Which makes John Murray Cuddihy argue, in his
very insightful essay The Ordeal of Civility, that Freud’s theory of sublimation resulting from repression came straight from the shtetl
Jews’ inner struggle over integration: “In psychoanalysis, the ‘id’ is
the functional equivalent of the ‘Yid’ in social intercourse.”[17]
Sexual liberation became a new version of the messianic ideal of
universal redemption by the Jews, the “light of the nations.” And as we
know, in practice, the Jewish way to save the nations is to defile their
most sacred values—their gods, and, above all, the Goddess.

From
the 1930s, American Jewish authors found in the theories of Freud and
his Jewish disciples the justification for assaulting the romantic ideal
and challenging the obscenity laws, as Josh Lambert shows in Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture (I quote from the free pdf
of his doctoral dissertation, of which the book is a rewriting). Ludwig
Lewisohn, “the most prominent Jewish writer in interwar America,” is a
case in point. He had been analyzed briefly by Freud, and was a close
friend of Otto Rank. Like Rank, Lewisohn liked to “portray traditional,
unassimilated Jewish sexuality as uniquely healthy.” He also shared
Wilhelm Reich’s ideas (The Mass Psychology of Fascism, 1934),
that anti-Semitism is a symptom of sexual frustration and can be cured
by liberating the Gentiles’ libido (a message echoed in Herbert
Marcuse’s Eros and Civilization, 1955 , as well as in Theodor Adorno’s The Authoritarian Personality, 1950).
So did Isaac Rosenfeld, who said: “I regard anti-Semitism as a symptom
of a serious, underlying psycho-sexual disease of epidemic proportion in
our society.” According to Josh Lambert,

“Much of the sexual utopianism and amateur sexology that appeared in the
fiction and essays of Norman Mailer, Saul Bellow, Allen Ginsberg, and
Isaac Rosenfeld in the 1940s and 1950s elaborated upon Reich’s attempt
to cure the sexual ills of all of Western civilization, and, in so
doing, to relieve Jews of their role as scapegoats.”

In
their endeavor to elevate obscenity to the status of art, Jewish authors
received the active support of Jewish lawyers and judges. “Jews
participated in these obscenity trials not only as defendants, but also
in key juridical roles,” writes Lambert, citing Jewish Supreme Court
justices Benjamin Cardozo, Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, Arthur
Goldberg, and Abe Fortas.[18]

In 1969 Philip Roth unleashed his novel, Portnoy’s Complaint, the confession of a sex-obsessed American Jew, who lusted after the shikses as
a teenager (“My circumcised little dong is simply shriveled up with
veneration. . . . How do they get so gorgeous, so healthy, so blond?”),
before securing a blond shiksa for himself, whom he nicknamed The
Monkey. “Hating Your Goy and Eating One Too,” is how the narrator
describes the experience, making the following confession to his
psychiatrist:

“What I’m saying, Doctor, is that I don’t seem to stick my dick up these
girls, as much as I stick it up their backgrounds — as though through
fucking I will discover America. Conquer American — maybe that’s more
like it.”

For Roth/Portnoy, “America is a shiksa nestling under your arm whispering love love love love love!”[19] Roth is not the only American-Jewish novelist sharing this vision of American society as the shiksa, in other words, a sexual object to be screwed .[20]

And
this should not be mistaken as the traditional Jewish resentment against
Christianity. It is not “Christian values” that are attacked with
extreme violence by hollywoodism, pornography, psychoanalysis, feminism,
homosexualism and anti-LGBTQphobia, not forgetting modern art; it is
the Western tradition of love, the miracle of our civilization. This
cultural assault is the enduring manifestation of Yahweh’s ancient rage
against the Queen of Heaven. Blessed are those Jews who turned their
back on Jeremiah’s sociopathic god and found comfort in the Goddess
instead. We need them more than ever."

The usual: "LILLEY: Liberals must answer questions on dumped candidate":

"Guillet was booted as the Liberal candidate for the Montreal riding
of St. Leonard-St. Michel after B’Nai Brith raised issues about the
man’s past statements and actions. B’Nai Brith noted that Guillet had
celebrated the release from prison of Raed Salah, a Hamas-aligned
activist who claimed Jews were behind the 9/11 attacks and that Jews
bake bread using the blood of non-Jewish children.
There were also
statements from Guillet himself, including calling Israel an apartheid
state and claiming that “Zionists control American politics.” Guillet
even accused U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, of
pushing an “Israel first” agenda through the White House."

and (ha, ha, ha!):

"“The anti-Semitic tropes of ‘Zionists controlling governments’ and of ‘dual loyalty’ are two of the more abhorrent expressions of paranoid anti-Jewish conspiracy theories,” said Michael Mostyn, CEO of B’nai Brith Canada."