IndependentVik

ramyb wrote:I'm in the process of reworking and restructuring it in a way that I can still convey the same idea without it being so similar in aesthetics. I'm going to continue working on it tomorrow and hopefully have something to show sometime in the afternoon.

Lurntospel

jasneko

JesseBYAH wrote:Cute!!! I love the way it turned out, and the kelly green was a great choice. Looks like your other version is getting more attention, but this one is more on-theme. I like them both, my favorite is still the bear with the mouth full of bagel Good luck, hopefully you'll get more feedback on both of them!

Glad you love it JesseByah! Looks like this one is now doing better than the other, so good to see! Ah, I was wondering which bear people liked best

HollidayStudios

SirGecko wrote:Smokey is the National Forest Service not the National Park Service! (a minor quibble I know but it seems most people aren't even aware that there is a difference between the two organizations)

ramyb

I tried reworking the design in a lot of different ways, and ultimately this was my favorite outcome. I didn't want to abandon the concept entirely, but I wanted to add a bit more subtlety, in addition to addressing some of the concerns people had in terms of wearability. I wanted to take the idea and change the execution to make it different, and hopefully it is changed enough. This way, I think it can stand alone as a shirt without the lungs, but at the same time might make someone do a double-take when they look at the shirt.

capedcrusader514

I'm kinda unimpressed with the changes but it will definitely surge to the front. Of course there will be haters and groupies followed by some long ass discussion about why you suck but this will probably fog so congrats, i guess.

ramyb

Honestly, I really doubt it. I really had no hopes of fogging when I was working on this edit, it's more so a matter of the fact that I'm proud of this piece and didn't want to just throw it away. This has been a very high voting contest, so the likelihood of a late entry making it up there is really low, and I just can't see it happening, especially since the original was struggling to stay in the fog in the first place.

MMagieD wrote:I was devastated this was rejected. Thanks for bringing it back. I looked at the other 'tree lung' shirts out there and none of them are this good. I like the reinterpretation better.

GMV.

Thanks, hopefully woot will decide that the new version is a new interpretation of the idea I think that the composition of the original was too similar to existing shirts, so I tried to change it completely this time around.

Galaxie64

Zeradin

ramyb wrote:I tried reworking the design in a lot of different ways, and ultimately this was my favorite outcome. I didn't want to abandon the concept entirely, but I wanted to add a bit more subtlety, in addition to addressing some of the concerns people had in terms of wearability. I wanted to take the idea and change the execution to make it different, and hopefully it is changed enough. This way, I think it can stand alone as a shirt without the lungs, but at the same time might make someone do a double-take when they look at the shirt.

Hope you enjoy the changes, and thanks again for all the support.

Do you draw your shirts out? Illustrator? What's the deal. You're amazing. (sorry if you get this question often, I just started looking at these)

leonAzul

IMHO it would be much more successful as a shirt design if the transparent and gray areas were reversed. This way the design would just 'float' on the shirt, instead of appearing to be bounded by a gray background with distractingly feathered edges. Just a suggestion.

bassanimation

Hahaha, yeah, I feel bad because this is super funny. But as a chick, I would not want people to see me wearing it..and if I was a dude..well..yeah. This is a great concept tho, honestly I like it. If I had more confidence I'd wear it ^^;.

Woot.com is operated by Woot Services LLC.
Products on Woot.com are sold by Woot, Inc., other than items on Wine.Woot which are sold by the seller specified on the product detail page.
Product narratives are for entertainment purposes and frequently employ
literary point of view;
the narratives do not express Woot's editorial opinion.
Aside from literary abuse, your use of this site also subjects you to Woot's
terms of use
and
privacy policy.
Woot may designate a user comment as a Quality Post, but that doesn't mean we agree with or guarantee anything said or linked to in that post.