Post by Jai Guru Deva on Nov 15, 2005 12:58:31 GMT -5

The white line is a type of watermark for copy protection. It's on all the photos at the particular site where you got it. It also looks like you've hotlinked. So what you're going to need to do is host it on your own web space. Try www.photobucket.com.

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see - Ayn Rand

Post by dieroboter on Nov 15, 2005 13:46:37 GMT -5

jaigurudeva said:

The white line is a type of watermark for copy protection. It's on all the photos at the particular site where you got it. It also looks like you've hotlinked. So what you're going to need to do is host it on your own web space. Try www.photobucket.com.

Post by on Dec 30, 2005 11:32:57 GMT -5

Great site, Dieroboter. I think it's amusing that Linda didn't find it necessary to wear a bra In those photos, Bill's face looks so much longer than Paul's was. Compare any of those photos to the photos that Red Lion posted above. Paul had a much smaller forehead than Bill has.

Post by on Jan 1, 2006 15:10:25 GMT -5

Post by LOVELYRITA on Jan 1, 2006 21:02:50 GMT -5

lili said:

Great site, Dieroboter. I think it's amusing that Linda didn't find it necessary to wear a bra In those photos, Bill's face looks so much longer than Paul's was. Compare any of those photos to the photos that Red Lion posted above. Paul had a much smaller forehead than Bill has.

Perhaps the reason why Linda didn't have the bra on that day, because Bill was sportin' it.

This is "Bill" but why did Linda always hang onto his arm like that? That was the Linda who did not wear make up. There was another Linda who did, compare the wedding photos from 1969.

Was that the only difference between the "Lindas" ? It might seem logical that she would wear makeup to her wedding and not otherwise. This picture of Faul and Linda remind me of one of the most interesting PID posts EVER (IMO). It was by this guy that claimed to work for Faul and Linda in Arizona. This is a much underexamined time in Fauls life. This guy had no idea that McFake was not James Paul McCartney at the time and NEITHER DID ANYONE ELSE (including Linda). This was even though Faul was far taller than JPM. In other words Faul is a VERY TRICKY guy (as everyone knows). It could be that there are TWO Lindas and two Fauls (this has been mentioned many times before of course about Faul but not about Linda). Any other pics or theories?

Post by cherilyn7 on Apr 8, 2014 19:29:44 GMT -5

This is "Bill" but why did Linda always hang onto his arm like that? That was the Linda who did not wear make up. There was another Linda who did, compare the wedding photos from 1969.

Was that the only difference between the "Lindas" ? It might seem logical that she would wear makeup to her wedding and not otherwise. This picture of Faul and Linda remind me of one of the most interesting PID posts EVER (IMO). It was by this guy that claimed to work for Faul and Linda in Arizona. This is a much underexamined time in Fauls life. This guy had no idea that McFake was not James Paul McCartney at the time and NEITHER DID ANYONE ELSE (including Linda). This was even though Faul was far taller than JPM. In other words Faul is a VERY TRICKY guy (as everyone knows). It could be that there are TWO Lindas and two Fauls (this has been mentioned many times before of course about Faul but not about Linda). Any other pics or theories?

**********************************************************************************************************Hello, hotman637, I have been meaning to get back to you for some time but this thread/post caught my attention: it has been mentioned elsewhere on NIR that there were more than one Lindas; Linda Eastman from New York and Linda See from Arizona. One had a shoulder length bob hairstyle with side parting and wore makeup and had shapely legs. The other had funny hair, chopped short at the top and NO makeup whatsoever, not very flattering and very thin legs. It could be that one of these women married Faul/Bill and ended up in Wings (not a musician however) and the other was a double who had a different role and probably the one formerly married to Melville See, who committed suicide in 2001 after "Linda's" death. Compare photos, one of them seemed to have a faraway stare and did funny poses for the camera. You mention two Fauls; I would say this is conservative and there have been several over the years from 1960 onwards.

Post by hotman637 on Apr 9, 2014 12:18:13 GMT -5

Was that the only difference between the "Lindas" ? It might seem logical that she would wear makeup to her wedding and not otherwise. This picture of Faul and Linda remind me of one of the most interesting PID posts EVER (IMO). It was by this guy that claimed to work for Faul and Linda in Arizona. This is a much underexamined time in Fauls life. This guy had no idea that McFake was not James Paul McCartney at the time and NEITHER DID ANYONE ELSE (including Linda). This was even though Faul was far taller than JPM. In other words Faul is a VERY TRICKY guy (as everyone knows). It could be that there are TWO Lindas and two Fauls (this has been mentioned many times before of course about Faul but not about Linda). Any other pics or theories?

**********************************************************************************************************Hello, hotman637, I have been meaning to get back to you for some time but this thread/post caught my attention: it has been mentioned elsewhere on NIR that there were more than one Lindas; Linda Eastman from New York and Linda See from Arizona. One had a shoulder length bob hairstyle with side parting and wore makeup and had shapely legs. The other had funny hair, chopped short at the top and NO makeup whatsoever, not very flattering and very thin legs. It could be that one of these women married Faul/Bill and ended up in Wings (not a musician however) and the other was a double who had a different role and probably the one formerly married to Melville See, who committed suicide in 2001 after "Linda's" death. Compare photos, one of them seemed to have a faraway stare and did funny poses for the camera. You mention two Fauls; I would say this is conservative and there have been several over the years from 1960 onwards.

Thanks for responding! Yes, I did know a little about Melville See and as I said one of the most interesting post I have ever read on the subject was from some guy who worked for Faul in Arizona (it might have been in TKIN). When I have more time I will look over pictures of "Linda" and see if there are two (or more). I had not heard about two Lindas before now. Now about the the multiple "Fauls". I think for sure there were multiple PAULS and maybe mulitple FAULS but if they are interchangable than the "Paul is Dead" (or even "Paul was replaced") theory HAS NO MEANING! In other words if PAUL and FAUL look and act pretty much the same then there is no reason to go on and on with endless analysis. I think that is why "Paul is Dead Miss Him Miss Him" does not do anything any more is because people were saying "Paul" and "Faul" were interchangable. To me the "Paul's" was smaller, different hair and eyes, etc. than the "Faul's". The "Paul's" were very similar TO EACH OTHER but are not much like the "Fauls". If people are going to say the "Pauls" and the "Fauls" are pretty much the same then we just might as well say PAUL IS NOT DEAD! Or even replaced. We just don't have enough evidence!

Post by cherilyn7 on Apr 10, 2014 18:35:06 GMT -5

knowthe411For Sale***

knowthe411 Avatar

Posts: 124

Dec 6, 2009 at 12:25am QuotelikePost Options Post by knowthe411 on Dec 6, 2009 at 12:25amI used to think the guy in the Two Fingers video was the real Paul, but I've changed my mind. The guy playing Two Fingers is Phil Ackrill, the THIRD Paul. You can usually tell Phil in these YouTube videos by 1) his droopy eyes, 2) his very small upper lip that looks to have a scar on the right (our right), 3) his goofy sense of humor and 4) the fact that he can just barely sing and sounds like a lounge singer imitating a rock star.

The Internet rumor I've seen says that "Paul" died one year after Linda. And Linda died on 17 April 1998. The rumor may be false, though, because I think I've seen Phil in interviews around 2001. He used to wear long hair feathered back but it's really short in the more recent videos.

As for who married Linda, well, that depends on whether you mean Linda Eastman (the real one) or Finda (Linda See) from Arizona. Faul married Finda but I believe Phil Ackrill either was married to or living with Linda. I could be wrong but so far I haven't seen JPM in a pic with the real Linda. So, I'm most likely in a minority because I'm not convinced the real Paul married either of them.

Post by cherilyn7 on Apr 10, 2014 18:39:43 GMT -5

The above post I thought you would find interesting in this regard re 2 Lindas.....this post was 6 Dec 2009. If there have been multiple Fauls; then it follows that there must have been multiple wives/girlfriends, so it would seem there were different Lindas for continuity.