To all, we need to support our brothers on this one. How about the next time a group has a cross lighting 10.000 pro Whites show up. I am not a Klansman but every time that I have attended a Klan rally I have been welcomed and had a good time.
This is about religious freedom.

First of all, there's nothing controversial about saying that "the First Amendment is not absolute." Clearly standing in a public area and yelling "I'm going to kill Person X on Date Y by doing Z to him! Hahaha!" is not protected speech. I hope there's no controversy over that, I suspect the Court just assumed people hearing about the majority opinion would be ignorant of that fact. However:

The traditional yardstick of whether speech was protected by the First Amenment or not has been the clear and present danger test: if your speech is likely to cause imminent lawless action, the First Amendment does not protect it. That's why the old example of yelling "fire!" in a crowded theatre is not protected.

Now for cross lighting to be considered to cause imminent lawless action, the act of lighting the cross would have to incite lawless action (lynching?). You'd have a tough time arguing that.

I wonder if putting Christmas lights on a cross is also effectively banned by this. No? Then they're specifying the means by which a cross can be lit. And they didn't specify what KIND of cross, etc...