The Sorrier thing is to MANY liberals i know (via gaming or military circles), that is “all a-ok” to them. Their ideas of compromises is they say what they want, WE say ok. THEY NEVER ever see that for a true compromise, they also have to give..

This has always been the democrat’s idea of compromise. Remember 10 years ago when the party line was “elections have consequences”? Since most liberalsa/progressives think they are smarter than everyone else you must be too stupid to know how wrong you are to contradict them! Nothing like group think.

Great cartoon! That is EXACTLY the conniving Commucrats’ definition of “compromise:” Give me everything I want, and to HELL with what YOU want. And if you DON’T give them what they want, they lie on the floor and kick and scream and threaten to hold their breath until they turn blue, until they GET what they want.

The best way to deal with toddlers throwing tantrums is to swat them on their spoiled little behinds and cut their hysterics SHORT. I’d say that’s a reasonable way to deal with tantrum-throwing, obstructive, America-hating COMMUCRATs, too–the declaring of a national emergency being the equivalent of a swat on their sorry behinds.

They sound also like many wives, of married folk i know. Where the wife’s idea of compromise is the Husband is always wrong, the wife always right. The husbands needs/wants matter not, the wives always do… and so on.

Recent Comments

""The Democratic Party today is a good deal further left than the Democratic Party of 1937..."
That's not quite right.
"The Democratic Party today is a good deal further left than Lenin/Stalin and the Communist revolutionaries in Russia of 1917..."
That's better."Comment by DrGadget
Posted in Ominous specter: Dems want to ‘pack’ America’s highest court