14:55:08 <mielvds1> Arnaud: I'd like to know how many people want to be able to reuse vocabularies. This is actually more of a requirement than a use case, as it applies to several use cases. The member submission failed to include this requirement and as a result our UC&R doesn't.

Arnaud Le Hors: I'd like to know how many people want to be able to reuse vocabularies. This is actually more of a requirement than a use case, as it applies to several use cases. The member submission failed to include this requirement and as a result our UC&R doesn't.←

14:56:43 <mielvds1> Arnaud: just one type of membership. This makes it easier for developers and users that start from scratch. On the other hand, people with domain vocabularies will have to do a transformation

Arnaud Le Hors: just one type of membership. This makes it easier for developers and users that start from scratch. On the other hand, people with domain vocabularies will have to do a transformation←

14:59:28 <bblfish> in short it's the wrong question. The end of ISSUE-71 shows two other ways to allow the same use cases to be resolved. Add some kind of declarative inferencing language and one has many more possibilites.

Henry Story: in short it's the wrong question. The end of ISSUE-71 shows two other ways to allow the same use cases to be resolved. Add some kind of declarative inferencing language and one has many more possibilites.←

14:59:50 <pchampin> so keeping it orthogonal with the app-specific vocabulary seems a reasonable way to proceed

Pierre-Antoine Champin: so keeping it orthogonal with the app-specific vocabulary seems a reasonable way to proceed←

15:00:01 <mielvds1> Arnaud: I'm saying this because the question about not having a use case for this was raised.

Arnaud Le Hors: I'm saying this because the question about not having a use case for this was raised.←

15:02:24 <TallTed> this seems effectively to raise the question of "require inference (to handle { ldp:membershipPredicate owl:subProperty rdfs:member } ), or do not require inference" ... and I've hit a hard stop and must drop from this call.

Ted Thibodeau: this seems effectively to raise the question of "require inference (to handle { ldp:membershipPredicate owl:subProperty rdfs:member } ), or do not require inference" ... and I've hit a hard stop and must drop from this call.←

<mielvds1> Arnaud: We'll have to leave it at that for now. Please, be courteous in your communication.

Arnaud Le Hors: We'll have to leave it at that for now. Please, be courteous in your communication.←