Behind all those religious trappings, unspeakable secrets are coming to light

We pray they’ll be coming to an end once they’re all exposedBy Maramis

Maramis Choufani is the Managing Editor of the Las Vegas Tribune.

We’ve known about “the problem” for quite a while, but we didn’t know how really deep it went. Because of the nature of the crime — coming from behind those religious trappings, so to speak — it was all kept on the hush-hush to ostensibly not cast a dark shadow over Catholicism and to not despoil the reputations of all those priests and even higher-level men of the cloth.
But secret no more will they be. In addition to the accusations made by the victims, there is at least one major law firm that has taken on the cause of exposing the guilty at all levels and bringing them to justice.
One headline read, Archdiocese of New York Sued for Maintaining, Concealing the Public Hazard of Sexually Abusive Priests. The subhead read, Fr. Donald Timone and Msgr. John Paddack Remained in Ministry Despite Multiple Prior Reports of Child Sexual Abuse.
Okay, so it might only be in New York for now, but if you tackle the big apples first, tackling the rest of the fruit in the basket will be that much easier, in turn. And the law firm of Jeff Anderson & Associates, from whom this information was obtained, is not hesitant to take them on.
Today was a big day in New York for announcing the filing of a lawsuit against the Archdiocese of New York alleging that the Catholic Church officials engaged in an ongoing pattern of conduct to keep priests in their positions after they discovered their concealed sexually abusive histories. Included in that meeting was a discussion on the harm the Archdiocese was doing by exposing the public, and especially children, to the risk of sexual abuse.
It’s about time we got to the naming of names, and the naming of places where the offending clergy were “stationed.” Today’s discussion was to reveal the history of Fr. Timone, who has worked as a priest in the Archdiocese since approximately 1960. One of the Plaintiffs is the widow of a man who was allegedly sexually abused as a minor by Fr. Timone from approximately 1966 to 1970. Her husband reported the abuse by Fr. Timone to the Archdiocese in about 2003 and the Archdiocese is believed to have received at least one other report of sexual abuse of a minor around that time. The Archdiocese briefly suspended Fr. Timone while those allegations were internally investigated before returning him to work. Plaintiff’s husband suffered greatly from the abuse trauma and died by suicide in 2015. In November 2016, this Plaintiff participated in the Archdiocese’s Independent Reconciliation and Conciliation Program (IRCP). She submitted a claim to the IRCP and accepted a settlement offer on May 24, 2017. The Archdiocese’s IRCP is believed to have awarded at least one other settlement to a Fr. Timone sexual abuse survivor. Despite knowledge of at least two reports and IRCP payments regarding sexual abuse by Fr. Timone in 2017, the Archdiocese allowed Fr. Timone to continue in his assignment at St. Joseph in Middletown, NY.
Subsequently, on December 4, 2018, the Archdiocese certified in a letter to the Diocese of San Diego that Fr. Timone was fit to work in the Diocese and falsely stated that Fr. Timone had never been accused of sexual misconduct involving a minor. As a result, Fr. Timone continued to work in the Diocese of San Diego, California until December 20, 2018, when the Diocese of San Diego learned about Fr. Timone’s history of sexually abusing minors from a December 20, 2018,
news article. It is believed that Fr. Timone remains temporarily suspended by the Archdiocese of New York.
Next on the agenda was revealing the history of Msgr. Paddack, who worked as a priest in the Archdiocese since about 1984. One of the two Plaintiffs alleges that Msgr. Paddack sexually abused him as a minor back in 2001-2002 or so. Then the Archdiocese received a report about five years ago that Msgr. Paddack sexually abused another minor in 1994. Despite this report, the Archdiocese continued Msgr. Paddack in his assignment at the Church of Notre Dame and did not release any information regarding the allegations. Thank goodness that no person, or even collection of priests or higher, can represent the religion as
a whole. While I am not Catholic (although I used to be), I believe religion must not be judged by individuals — even hundreds of them — but by the teachings of the Teacher.
Earlier this year, Jeff Anderson & Associates law firm released a list of 112 names of Archdiocese of New York clergy accused of sexual misconduct of minors. The list included Msgr. Paddack. But in April of this year, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the Archbishop of New York, released a list of 126 Archdiocesan clergy credibly accused of sexually abusing minors and Msgr. Paddack was not on that list. Since Jeff Anderson & Associates released its list in February, seven
survivors of sexual abuse by Msgr. Paddack have come forward and reported their abuse to the Archdiocese. Despite these reports, the Archdiocese has taken no action to restrict or prevent Msgr. Paddack from accessing children and has not updated its list to include his name.
Hopefully, the outcome of today’s meeting demanding that the Archdiocese of New York and Cardinal Dolan cease the ongoing practices of hiding the names of all of the offenders and their histories and failing to warn the public about sexually abusive clergy that endangers the safety of the public had the expected and hoped-for conclusion. The only remedy for this horrendous and dangerous situation is for ALL the identities and files pertinent to the offending clergy be made public, not just to the parishioners involved, but to the public at large and the police, so all can know who was complicit in the ongoing concealment of this hazard.
As someone once said, truth does not suffer from close examination. And getting to the truth about the sexual abuse behind the clergy can only clear the air for all concerned, while it will not tarnish the source of Truth itself.
* * * * *
Maramis Choufani is the Managing Editor of the Las Vegas Tribune. She writes a weekly column in this newspaper. To contact Maramis, email her at maramis@lasvegastribune.com.

City Council votes an abeyance of ordinance to jail developers
By Alexandra Cohen
De Oro Media Group
Las Vegas Tribune Exclusive
Tuesday the Las Vegas City Council Recommending Committee voted for an
abeyance on the controversial ordinance — Bill No. 2018-24 — sponsored
by City Councilman Steve Seroka, a councilman who is being sued in
Federal Court by developer Yohan Lowie for bias. This abeyance now
moves the bill to the September 4, 2018 Recommending Committee, then
to be heard by the full City Council on September 6.
The proposed bill will severally penalize developers with excessive
fines and jail time for not abiding by new standards. The bill is
opposed by the Commercial Real Estate Development Association (NAIOP),
The Latin Chamber of Commerce and Laborers Local 872, along with
others in the building and trades community. The bill NO.2018-24, also
known as the «Yohan Lowie bill,” is an ordinance to amend LVMC Title
19 (The Unified Development Code) to adopt additional standards and
requirements regarding the repurposing of certain golf courses and
open spaces.
The ordinance was met with strong position from those speaking at
today’s meeting. Tommy White, Secretary Treasurer of the Laborers
Local 872 said “this City Council is sending the wrong message to not
only the local building community, but to the entire nation. This is
simply government overreach.” Mr. White vowed to bring 600 of his
union members to the next meeting to protest the flawed ordinance.
Peter Guzman, President of the Latin Chamber of Commerce, stated, “I
have received numerous calls from my members opposed to this
ordinance. This ordinance is contrary to our group’s philology and
focus of promoting commerce and growth in our community.” Todd Davis,
General Council, EHB Companies pointed out to the Recommending
Committee that “the Agenda states ‘NO FISCAL IMPACT,’ when clearly
there is a fiscal impact to taxpayers ranging from substantial legal
fees to defend the ordinance, to hundreds of millions of dollars if
the ordinance is found to be a taking.”
Councilwoman Michele Fiore publically and vehemently objected to the
ordinance in the July 18 council meeting and at times verbally sparred
with the bill sponsor, Councilman Seroka, citing that the ordinance
started as a 5-page ordinance and FAILED in the Las Vegas Planning
Commission by a 5 to 1 vote. Now, behind the scenes, it has been
expanded to a 13-page document and is being considered for approval.
Developer Yohan Lowie, stated, “this is typical of the corruption and
disingenuous acts of certain members of the city of Las Vegas who have
demonstrated for the past three years, and one of the reasons why I am
in litigation with Councilman Seroka and Bob Coffin for the animus
they continue to display. They are enacting a law to create criminal
penalties for the property no longer being a golf course and no longer
being green. All property owners should be concerned.” This bill may
be as far-reaching as to affect individual homeowners living in a golf
course community.
SECTION 7 in the bill states: Whenever in this ordinance any act is
prohibited or is made or declared to be unlawful... the doing of such
prohibited act or the failure to do any such required act shall
constitute a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be
punished by a fine of not more than $1,000.00 or by imprisonment for a
term of not more than six months.
Mr. Lowie has hired famed criminal defense lawyer David Chesnoff to
represent his interests in possible forthcoming criminal offenses that
may arise from this bill. Additionally, along with attorney and Lt.
Governor Mark Hutchison the City has been put on notice through a
letter, which states the City will be in violation of the EX Post
Facto Clause and Equal Protection Clause and a Taking by Eminent
Domain.
After the July 18 city council meeting, developer Yohan Lowie stated,
“If they want to put me in jail, they can. I will fight to my last
breath to prevent the City from EVER taking my property away. I will
continue to fight this matter all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court to
get justice.”