One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr…… for the AMERICAN THINKER.COM

The Great Recession should have put the victim-blaming theory of poverty to rest. In the space of only a few months, millions of people entered the ranks of the officially poor—not only laid-off blue-collar workers, but also downsized tech workers, managers, lawyers, and other once-comfortable professionals. No one could accuse these “nouveau poor” Americans of having made bad choices or bad lifestyle decisions. They were educated, hardworking, and ambitious, and now they were also poor—applying for food stamps, showing up in shelters, lining up for entry-level jobs in retail. This would have been the moment for the pundits to finally admit the truth: Poverty is not a character failing or a lack of motivation. Poverty is a shortage of money.

The study noted that, in the aftermath of the Great
Depression, the US undertook policies “during the New Deal [that] permanently
reduced income concentration until the 1970s.” In contrast, the study noted a
striking absence of any measures to reign in social inequality in the present
crisis. Far from it, the Obama administrations’ bank bailouts, austerity
program and wage-cutting policies have vastly expanded the prevalence of social
inequality.

HOPE and CHANGE and endless lies and con jobs as his WALL
STREET DONORS’ LOOTING of AMERICA CONTINUES!

Having presided for the past five years over an unprecedented growth of
social inequality, President Barack Obama, down in the polls because of popular
indignation over his fraudulent health care “reform,” adopted the unlikely pose
of tribune of egalitarian values in a speech on Wednesday at the pro-Democratic
Party Center for American Progress in Washington DC.

In typical fashion, Obama decried the growth of inequality in America as
though he were an innocent bystander and had absolutely no role in the process
he was criticizing. The most remarkable aspect of the speech was the contempt
for the intelligence of the American people it expressed.

OBAMA – THE
SOCIOPATH BANKSTERS FUNDED AND ILLEGALS REELECTED.

OBAMA
IS A SOCIOPATH. HE CAN LIE OUT OF HIS BIG MOUTH ABOUT ANYTHING AND THEN GO
SERVE HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS AND LA RAZA!

But
the latest New York Times/CBS News poll shows something that is a
troublesome sign for the White House. Only 30 percent of
Americans believe that the president “cares a lot” about “the needs and
problems of people” like themselves.

Barack
Obama… the man that conned an entire nation and still called it “CHANGE”… but
was only Bush’s 3rd & 4th terms.

The Great Recession should have put
the victim-blaming theory of poverty to rest. In the space of only a few
months, millions of people entered the ranks of the officially poor—not only
laid-off blue-collar workers, but also downsized tech workers, managers,
lawyers, and other once-comfortable professionals. No one could accuse these
“nouveau poor” Americans of having made bad choices or bad lifestyle decisions.
They were educated, hardworking, and ambitious, and now they were also
poor—applying for food stamps, showing up in shelters, lining up for
entry-level jobs in retail. This would have been the moment for the pundits to
finally admit the truth: Poverty is not a character failing or a lack of
motivation. Poverty is a shortage of money.

It Is Expensive to Be Poor

By Barbara
Ehrenreich

Binita Pradham is a
single mother who runs a food business and raises her 4-year-old son. (Barbara
Reis)

Fifty years ago, President Lyndon B. Johnson made a move that
was unprecedented at the time and remains unmatched by succeeding
administrations. He announced a War on Poverty, saying that its “chief weapons”
would be “better schools, and better health, and better homes, and better
training, and better job opportunities.”

So starting in 1964 and for almost a decade, the federal
government poured at least some of its resources in the direction they should
have been going all along: toward those who were most in need. Longstanding programs
like Head Start, Legal Services, and the Job Corps were created. Medicaid was
established. Poverty among seniors was significantly reduced by improvements in
Social Security.

Johnson seemed to have established the principle that it is
the responsibility of government to intervene on behalf of the disadvantaged
and deprived. But there was never enough money for the fight against poverty,
and Johnson found himself increasingly distracted by another and deadlier
war—the one in Vietnam. Although underfunded, the War on Poverty still managed
to provoke an intense backlash from conservative intellectuals and politicians.

The original welfare reform bill—a bill, it should be
recalled, which was signed by President Bill Clinton—included an allocation of
$100 million for "chastity training" for low-income women.

In their view, government programs could do nothing to help
the poor because poverty arises from the twisted psychology of the poor
themselves. By the Reagan era, it had become a cornerstone of conservative
ideology that poverty is caused not by low wages or a lack of jobs and
education, but by the bad attitudes and faulty lifestyles of the poor.

Picking up on this theory, pundits and politicians have
bemoaned the character failings and bad habits of the poor for at least the
past 50 years. In their view, the poor are shiftless, irresponsible, and prone
to addiction. They have too many children and fail to get married. So if they
suffer from grievous material deprivation, if they run out of money between
paychecks, if they do not always have food on their tables—then they have no
one to blame but themselves.

In the 1990s, with a bipartisan attack on welfare, this kind
of prejudice against the poor took a drastically misogynistic turn. Poor single
mothers were identified as a key link in what was called “the cycle of
poverty.” By staying at home and collecting welfare, they set a toxic example
for their children, who—important policymakers came to believe—would be better
off being cared for by paid child care workers or even, as Newt Gingrich
proposed, in orphanages.

Welfare “reform” was the answer, and it was intended not only
to end financial support for imperiled families, but also to cure the
self-induced “culture of poverty” that was supposedly at the root of their
misery. The original welfare reform bill—a bill, it should be recalled, which
was signed by President Bill Clinton—included an allocation of $100 million for
“chastity training” for low-income women.

The Great Recession should have put the victim-blaming theory of
poverty to rest. In the space of only a few months, millions of people entered
the ranks of the officially poor—not only laid-off blue-collar workers, but also
downsized tech workers, managers, lawyers, and other once-comfortable
professionals. No one could accuse these “nouveau poor” Americans of having
made bad choices or bad lifestyle decisions. They were educated, hardworking,
and ambitious, and now they were also poor—applying for food stamps, showing up
in shelters, lining up for entry-level jobs in retail. This would have been the
moment for the pundits to finally admit the truth: Poverty is not a character
failing or a lack of motivation. Poverty is a shortage of money.

For most women in poverty, in both good times and bad, the
shortage of money arises largely from inadequate wages. When I worked on my
book, Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, I took jobs as a
waitress, nursing-home aide, hotel housekeeper, Wal-Mart associate, and a maid
with a house-cleaning service. I did not choose these jobs because they were
low-paying. I chose them because these are the entry-level jobs most readily
available to women.

What I discovered is that in many ways, these jobs are a
trap: They pay so little that you cannot accumulate even a couple of hundred
dollars to help you make the transition to a better-paying job. They often give
you no control over your work schedule, making it impossible to arrange for
child care or take a second job. And in many of these jobs, even young women
soon begin to experience the physical deterioration—especially knee and back
problems—that can bring a painful end to their work life.

I was also dismayed to find that in some ways, it is actually
more expensive to be poor than not poor. If you can’t afford the first month’s
rent and security deposit you need in order to rent an apartment, you may get
stuck in an overpriced residential motel. If you don’t have a kitchen or even a
refrigerator and microwave, you will find yourself falling back on convenience
store food, which—in addition to its nutritional deficits—is also alarmingly
overpriced. If you need a loan, as most poor people eventually do, you will end
up paying an interest rate many times more than what a more affluent borrower
would be charged. To be poor—especially with children to support and care
for—is a perpetual high-wire act.

The criminalization of poverty has accelerated since the
recession.

Most private-sector employers offer no sick days, and many
will fire a person who misses a day of work, even to stay home with a sick
child. A nonfunctioning car can also mean lost pay and sudden expenses. A
broken headlight invites a ticket, plus a fine greater than the cost of a new
headlight, and possible court costs. If a creditor decides to get nasty, a
court summons may be issued, often leading to an arrest warrant. No amount of
training in financial literacy can prepare someone for such exigencies—or make
up for an income that is impossibly low to start with. Instead of treating
low-wage mothers as the struggling heroines they are, our political culture
still tends to view them as miscreants and contributors to the “cycle of
poverty.”

If anything, the criminalization of poverty has accelerated
since the recession, with growing numbers of states drug testing applicants for
temporary assistance, imposing steep fines for school truancy, and imprisoning
people for debt. Such measures constitute a cruel inversion of the Johnson-era
principle that it is the responsibility of government to extend a helping hand
to the poor. Sadly, this has become the means by which the wealthiest country
in the world manages to remain complacent in the face of alarmingly high levels
of poverty: by continuing to blame poverty not on the economy or inadequate
social supports, but on the poor themselves.

It’s time to revive the notion of a collective national
responsibility to the poorest among us, who are disproportionately women and
especially women of color. Until that happens, we need to wake up to the fact
that the underpaid women who clean our homes and offices, prepare and serve our
meals, and care for our elderly—earning wages that do not provide enough to
live on—are the true philanthropists of our society.

The study noted that, in the aftermath of the Great
Depression, the US undertook policies “during the New Deal [that] permanently
reduced income concentration until the 1970s.” In contrast, the study noted a
striking absence of any measures to reign in social inequality in the present
crisis. Far from it, the Obama administrations’ bank bailouts, austerity
program and wage-cutting policies have vastly expanded the prevalence of social
inequality.

POVERTY IN AMERICA

UNDER OBAMA IT IS SOARING POVERTY FOR AMERICANS BUT STILL
SOARING PROFITS FOR HIS BANKSTER DONORS!

WELFARE – THE STAGGERING COST OF MEXICO’S LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN
AMERICA. THESE ARE!ONLY! WELFARE COST
AND DO NOT INCLUDE THE COST OF THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE, OR THE ULTIMATE COST
OF MEXICO’S ASSAULT ON OUR BORDERS, LAWS AND CULTURE… Push 2 for English!

According
to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican
illegal alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org

DEMOCRATS PARTNER WITH REPUBLICANS TO CUT UNEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS AND WELFARE TO AMERICAS…. even as they hand millions of our jobs to
voting illegals and expand Mexico’s LA RAZA welfare state off our backs!

And it launched its “Obamacare” health care overhaul, which
is already being exposed as a massive attack on health care for tens of
millions of workers and a profit bonanza for the insurance companies. The
program includes $700 billion in Medicare cuts, opening the door to the gutting
of Medicare and Social Security, the two bedrock social programs dating from
the 1960s and 1930s.

OBAMA DONORS JP MORGAN AND THE LOOTING OF AMERICA FROM WALL STREET

CRONY CAPITALISM: OBAMA PROTECTS JP MORGAN, THE BIGGEST BANKSTER
CRIMINALS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, AND ONE OF OBAMA’S BIGGEST BANKSTER DONORS!

Nearly five years after the greatest financial crash since
the Great Depression, triggered by rampant illegality and fraud on the part of
the major banks, not a single major institution or leading bank executive has
been indicted, let alone tried, convicted and jailed.

They are vexing problems, but Republicans, led by Sen. Kelly Ayotte, came up with a proposal to solve them. The only difficulty was, the solution -- finding billions to pay for the restored pensions and unemployment insurance -- involved cracking down on a tax credit program in which illegal immigrants have fraudulently collected billions of dollars in improper payments. Stop the fraud, Ayotte argued, and then use the money saved to pay for pensions and unemployment insurance. It seemed like an elegant solution.

Except that Democrats would have none of it. Putting an end to the fraudulent collection of tax credits by illegal immigrants would hurt the most vulnerable, they argued. "This idea of going after children is one of the worst ideas I have ever heard," Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer said in floor debate Thursday. "I am shocked — I am shocked. You're going to hurt children. You're going to take away food out of their mouths."

THE DEMS WAR
ON POVERTY…. MEXICO’S NOT AMERICA’S …. as their bankster paymasters loot
Americans wave after wave!

WELFARE – THE
STAGGERING COST OF MEXICO’S LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA. THESE ARE!ONLY! WELFARE COST AND DO NOT INCLUDE THE
COST OF THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE, OR THE ULTIMATE COST OF MEXICO’S ASSAULT
ON OUR BORDERS, LAWS AND CULTURE… Push 2 for English!

According to the
Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal
alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org

DEMOCRATS
PARTNER WITH REPUBLICANS TO CUT UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS AND WELFARE TO AMERICAS….
even as they hand millions of our jobs to voting illegals and expand Mexico’s
LA RAZA welfare state off our backs!

While
the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret
amnesty
plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of
medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding
compensation from the federal government.

OBAMA HANDS TAX DOLLARS TO MEXICAN
SUPREMACIST:

(THE 2013 AMNESTY HOAX UPS AMERICAN TAX MONEY
GOING TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA BY $150 MILLION! VIVA LA RAZA
SUPREMACY? WE ARE PAYING FOR IT!

While
the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret
amnesty
plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of
medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding
compensation from the federal government.

OBAMA HANDS TAX DOLLARS TO MEXICAN
SUPREMACIST:

(THE 2013 AMNESTY HOAX UPS AMERICAN TAX MONEY
GOING TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA BY $150 MILLION! VIVA LA RAZA
SUPREMACY? WE ARE PAYING FOR IT!

The study noted that, in the aftermath of the Great
Depression, the US undertook policies “during the New Deal [that] permanently
reduced income concentration until the 1970s.” In contrast, the study noted a
striking absence of any measures to reign in social inequality in the present
crisis. Far from it, the Obama administrations’ bank bailouts, austerity
program and wage-cutting policies have vastly expanded the prevalence of social
inequality.

The study noted that, in the aftermath of the Great
Depression, the US undertook policies “during the New Deal [that] permanently
reduced income concentration until the 1970s.” In contrast, the study noted a
striking absence of any measures to reign in social inequality in the present
crisis. Far from it, the Obama administrations’ bank bailouts, austerity
program and wage-cutting policies have vastly expanded the prevalence of social
inequality.

The study noted that, in the aftermath of the Great
Depression, the US undertook policies “during the New Deal [that] permanently
reduced income concentration until the 1970s.” In contrast, the study noted a
striking absence of any measures to reign in social inequality in the present
crisis. Far from it, the Obama administrations’ bank bailouts, austerity
program and wage-cutting policies have vastly expanded the prevalence of social
inequality.

JP MORGAN

CRONY CAPITALISM: OBAMA PROTECTS JP MORGAN, THE BIGGEST
BANKSTER CRIMINALS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, AND ONE OF OBAMA’S BIGGEST BANKSTER
DONORS!

Nearly five years after the greatest financial crash since
the Great Depression, triggered by rampant illegality and fraud on the part of
the major banks, not a single major institution or leading bank executive has
been indicted, let alone tried, convicted and jailed.

THE DEMS WAR
ON POVERTY…. MEXICO’S NOT AMERICA’S …. as their bankster paymasters loot
Americans wave after wave!

Officers caught on video beating California homeless man to death acquitted of all charges

By John Andrews 14 January 2014

An Orange County jury returned a unanimous not-guilty verdict Tuesday in favor of two former Fullerton, California police officers, Manuel Ramos and Jay Cicinelli, who had been charged with murder and manslaughter arising from the July 5, 2011 death of Kelly Thomas, a hapless 37-year-old schizophrenic living on the streets of the Southern California suburb, located near Disneyland.

A California Jury's Baffling Verdict

By Andrew Cohen

Cathy Thomas stands with supporters in Santa Ana, California, after a courthouse news conference regarding the trial of the police officers who killed her son. (Alex Gallardo/Reuters)"Dad, help me."
"God, help me."
"Help me. Help me. Help me."
These were the last words of a mentally ill homeless man named Kelly Thomas, who was beaten into a coma by two Fullerton (California) police officers on the night of July 10, 2011. Thomas died five days later. Yet despite the fact that the beating was recorded on videotape, and the pleas of the beaten man were heard and recorded by audio devices worn by the officers, an Orange County jury Monday night acquitted both men of all of the criminal charges against them.
It was not second-degree murder, the jury concluded after about one full day of deliberations. It was not involuntary manslaughter, they said. It was not even an example of the use of "excessive force" on the part of the two officers, Manual Ramos and Jay Cicinelli, who for reasons still unclear are no longer cops. Moments after the verdicts, the prosecutor in the case announced he would not pursue criminal charges against a third officer on scene that night.
In most instances where the police use deadly force against citizens, judges and jurors and the rest of us are required to sift through one-sided accounts of what happened. Usually we are left to weigh the words of the police against the silence of the dead. But this case was different. We all can review the evidence to judge for ourselves whether this verdict is just or not.
Here is the video of the incident. (Warning: It is graphic.)
See web-only content: http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/01/a-california-jurys-baffling-verdict/283053/ And here, from The Los Angeles Times, which has covered this sad story so well through years, is perhaps the best summary of what happened:

Jurors, who are now weighing the fate of former officers Manuel Ramos and Jay Cicinelli, will also have to wrestle with the question of what actually killed the homeless man: the police beating, as prosecutors contend, or, as defense attorneys suggest, a diseased heart damaged by years of drug use.

[District Attorney Tony] Rackauckas said Ramos was a bully who wanted to hurt Thomas, and Cicinelli crossed the line when he used his stun gun to hit the mentally ill homeless man in the face.

Orange County's top prosecutor focused on what he said was a turning point in Thomas' encounter with the police: Ramos slipping on a pair of latex gloves as he tells Thomas, "See these fists?.... They're getting ready to ---- you up."

Rackauckas said Ramos' threatening words and provocative actions turned a routine police encounter into a crime scene. The prosecutor said that once the officer threatened Thomas, the homeless man had a right to defend himself.

In the video, Thomas can be seen standing up and backing away from Ramos. Within seconds, Ramos and another officer begin swinging their batons at him.

Cicinelli can be seen arriving at the scene as the two officers struggled with Thomas on the ground. The video shows Cicinelli using his Taser multiple times to stun Thomas and then finally smacking the homeless man in the face with it.

"I just probably smashed his face to hell," Cicinelli is heard saying after the struggle.

What do you see when you watch the video? I see an obviously ill man whose illness precludes him from having a rational interaction with the police. And I see officers who clearly lose whatever patience they may have had toward this ill man at the outset of the encounter. And when they lose their patience, I see them become unhinged and then unremitting in their use of force, even as Thomas can be heard begging for them to stop, pleading with them that he cannot breathe. It is painful to watch it unfold knowing how it all ends.
To me, this horrible video is the epitome of the use of "excessive force"—at a minimum. So what did those jurors see that I missed in the video? What in turn did I see that they did not? How could it be that not a single member of that jury was willing to stand up for Thomas for even a single night following the lone full day of deliberations? They have not commented publicly since Monday evening but it’s reasonable to assume a few things: 1) They were open to persuasion from defense attorneys offering context about the video, 2) they were willing to give the officers the benefit of the doubt about the reasonable of their fears that Thomas could hurt them, and 3) they accepted the broad swath of California law designed to protect cops from culpability for these sorts of avoidable deaths.
That’s why the defense said, over and over again at trial, that these policemen were, their lawyer said in court, "peace officers ... doing what they were trained to do." And perhaps that is the most frightening component of all of this—one that transforms this local tragedy into a national question. By this verdict jurors told us they believe these officers were merely following their training. So how many police officers in America today are out on patrol and similarly untrained (or emotionally ill-equipped) to handle the mentally ill? How many other police forces have trained their officers to use their weapons in this fashion against homeless people screaming for help?
Immediately after the verdict, the "dad" whose son cried out for help that night was predictably shaken by the acquittals. "I just don't get it," said Ron Thomas. He doesn't but I do. The law protects the police more than it protects the mentally ill in America. If you need more proof then consider the abuse and neglect the mentally ill endure in the nation's prisons all over the country. So why should we have expected jurors in this case to have honored Thomas' legacy by holding responsible the men who so savagely beat him? We've dehumanized the poor, and the homeless, and the mentally ill, and this is what we get.

Related Story

The Appalling Story of South Carolina's Prisons You know what else is sad about all this? Knowing, as anyone who follows the prison beat knows, that had Thomas survived the encounter and been arrested and convicted, he likely would have ended up being mistreated and abused in jail or prison on account of his schizophrenia. There are a thousand Kelly Thomases in our nation's prisons today, wallowing in horrific conditions because their jailors treat them and their illnesses with the contempt we saw unleashed against Thomas. It's an ongoing American tragedy.
I followed this case but never wrote about it because I assumed—wrongly it turns out—that Orange County jurors would convict. But I should have known better. The results of these cases often don't turn upon the strength of the facts or upon the evidence introduced at trial. They often turn instead upon what a group of people, a group of jurors, think is right and wrong. Jurors obviously believe they made the right choice. But because of the existence of that video, and what it shows us with our own eyes, the rest of us are more free than usual to criticize that choice. And I choose to do so. What has happened here— both on that night in July 2011 and again today—is wrong. Painfully, manifestly, cruelly wrong. It is a travesty upon justice.

And if the courts and jurors of California are unwilling to see it that way, I hope the Justice Department now investigates the case as a matter of a potential violation of federal civil rights. Indeed, the FBI already has indicated it is going to take another look at this case. Kelly Thomas, and his dad, deserve at least that much. If this shameful incident is to have any meaning, if any good is to come out of such a bad thing, the story can't end here like this.This article available online at:
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/01/a-california-jurys-baffling-verdict/283053/

America
faces a greater and more dangerous threat from within than from without. While
our armed forces secure Afghanistan and Iraq, our own borders stand unguarded
24 hours a day. Al-Qaeda insurgents plan their next attacks somewhere inside
our country. They advocate a violent overthrow of America.

WAR – PELOSI, FEINSTEIN, SYRIA

WAR, WAR, WAR. . . OVER THERE FOR
MUSLIM DICTATORS AND OPEN AND UNDEFENDED BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX!

IN SECRET COLLUSION WITH BARACK OBAMA
and THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA, PELOSI, FEINSTEIN AND BOXER PUSH HARD
FOR OPEN BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY AND EXPANDED WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS. . . IT'S HOW
THEY'RE BUILDING THE NEW LA RAZA DEM PARTY OF ILLEGALS!

THEY SABOTAGE OUR BORDERS AND THEN
LIE ENDLESSLY ABOUT HOMELAND SECURITY AS LA RAZA AND THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS
POUR OVER OUR BORDERS!

Lou Dobbs Tonight Friday, May 16,
2008

(FEINSTEIN IS THE BIGGEST WAR
PROFITEER IN AMERICAN HISTORY. SHE HAS VOTED FOR ANY AND ALL WARS SHE COULD)

Some in Congress are once again
trying to push piecemeal immigration reform through the back door. Sen. Dianne
Feinstein of California attached a farm worker program to the multibillion
dollar Iraq war funding bill yesterday which would grant temporary amnesty to
1.3 million farm workers and their families over the next five years.

FARM
LABOR – DEPORTATIONS

“What
we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by
not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World
corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans.
If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or
insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without
paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying
Americans.”

“The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration
policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for
low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers
lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding
of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor

“What
we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by
not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World
corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans.
If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or
insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without
paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying
Americans.”

OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS and
BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS WHILE HE DAILY
SABOTAGES AMERICAN BORDERS TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS!

The Saudis and Gulf Arabs, cash-fat on the $110-a-barrel oil
they sell U.S. consumers, will pick up the tab for the Tomahawk missiles. Has
it come to this — U.S. soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen as the mercenaries
of sheiks, sultans and emirs, Hessians of the New World Order, hired out to do
the big-time killing for Saudi and Sunni royals?

According to the report, the amount of heroin seized at the southern U.S. border increased 232% between 2008 and 2012 — apparently the result of greater Mexican heroin production and a growing incursion by Mexican traffickers into U.S. markets. It notes that the U.S. is experiencing a “sizable increase” in the number of new heroin users.

THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS ENDORSE BARACK OBAMA’S SABOTAGE of HOMELAND SECURITY TO BUILD THE LA RAZA DEM PARTY BASE of VOTING ILLEGALS, AND TO EASE EVEN MORE ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED and PROFITS HIGH FOR HIS WALL STREET DONORS.

MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “THE RACE” google it!