instead i suggest you ignore barr_ufficial, is telling the same things his friend bit1 does and this last have a list of dead coins only on the paper because doesn't run real checks

What is your definition of a dead coin? No volume, no block explorer, no development, no community, nobody cares about the coin?

Spacecoin had no block explorer. Digital Credits put up a block explorer to bring the coin back to life, supposedly so they could kill it and make it dead again, supposedly to get rid of coins that were already dead. And when the burn is over and they take down the block explorer, then Spacecoin will be right back where it started.

We do not work with bit1 or use his lists. We made our own lists for BARR, checking every coin on Coinmarketcap and also some coins that weren't on Coinmarketcap. We checked all block explorers and reviewed every Bitcointalk ANN for over 600 coins. It took a lot of time, effort, and work, and it has paid off in BARR's results which have demolished people's predictions of what we would accomplish.

Digital Credits, on the other hand, picked 3 coins to burn - and then found out at the last minute that 2 of them wouldn't work. He wanted to copy BARR, but he didn't put in the necessary thought or effort into doing a proper job. And it shows.

Digital Credits has never burned any altcoins, he asks you to send your coins to an exchange and trust them instead of burning the coins yourself, and he's already sent out 6 million DGCS from his premined "burn fund". The millions of DGCS at Yobit and BTCPoolExchange cannot be tracked on a block explorer, so there is no way to see who is getting those coins.

Only 200,000 DGCS have been mined with PoW, but 200,000,000 were premined. That's a 76-year supply for exchanging burned altcoins, according to the dcredits official website. Why so many? How will those coins be handled? Are they already being sold on multiple exchanges? There's no way to know, because there is no transparency.

The dcredits website and ANN said that intristin won't have control of the premined funds; it said that only 2.6 million DGCS will be issued per year for burned altcoins;it said that those coins will never move except in exchange for burned altcoins and will never be used for giveaways;and it said that we can check the block explorer to make sure the funds aren't being stolen.

That's the only transparency and accountability Digital Credits offered to the public, and all of those promises have already been broken.

intristin sends millions of DGCS whenever he wants, without announcing it first on any of his several Bitcointalk topics. He made a fake forum on his own website, "had a vote" to break his promises, 2 "new" users "voted" to take 1 million premined coins from the "burn fund", and then intristin has never posted again on that fake forum, since over 2 weeks ago, ever since he had the "vote". He sent 1 million DGCS to Yobit "for a faucet that pays 5 DGCS per hour" and he sent 5 million DGCS to BTCPoolExchange "for burned altcoins".

He wants other people to buy DGCS, but he sits apparently doing nothing while DGCS has a daily volume of .01btc. But he spent money to have someone code his wallet, he spent money to get listed on exchanges, he spent money for a website, and he spent money for block explorers. Why is he spending money on everything except buying his own DGCS coins? Maybe he's planning to sell more than he buys, because he doesn't seem to think DGCS is worth buying. He's not even one of the top miners, so he's not bothering to mine much either. Why should he mine a few hundred, when he has 194 Million left to spend however he wants?

BARR has burned $20,000 worth of altcoins since last month, with all transactions publicly available on decentralized blockchains. All distribution of BARR is transparent, available to everyone on the NXT blockchain, and every transaction from our burnfund includes a message with the txid of the altcoins burned to earn that BARR. It's airtight, with no unanswered questions.

We have spent thousands of dollars of our personal money to keep our promises, support the price of BARR and of the altcoins we're burning, and give hundreds of people the chance to get their money back from these altcoins.

So you can ignore us if you want, but we're running a legitimate project and getting things done.

BARR has burned 33% of all Fractalcoins, 36% of all Keycoins, 48% of all Sapience coins, 36% of Lyrabar, and 41% of Anarchists Prime. These are coins that people actually want, that they pay money for, that they could have sold for BTC, that have now been burned in exchange for BARR.

We have a real system, and it works. We don't just tell people, "Buy 200 SelfieCoins for 1 satoshi each, then exchange them for 1 DGCS which is worth 100 satoshis, losing half your money as soon as you start, oh wait SelfieCoin is broken never mind."

1. my definition of dead coin is based on one thing:no nodes, i don't care about block explorers, exchange and other things.2. on the world of crypto even in 12 second something big can happen and they noticed it the hard way, they aren't copying anybody othervise they would burn the coins you go behind

BARR_Official, you have been trying to FUD Digital Credits since we first came out and your attempts have failed. But good luck with that. You currently burning a coin under active development which by the way is shady. The DEV of said coin don't even like you. I don't understand what your problem is with me or why you keep attacking me. But if that what makes your dick hard, keep trying. At the end of the day we will still be here. Good luck with your NXT asset!

BARR_Official, you have been trying to FUD Digital Credits since we first came out and your attempts have failed. But good luck with that. You currently burning a coin under active development which by the way is shady. The DEV of said coin don't even like you. I don't understand what your problem is with me or why you keep attacking me. But if that what makes your dick hard, keep trying. At the end of the day we will still be here. Good luck with your NXT asset!

somehow i totally agree with you, and there are even other proof of burn coins and who knows if barr_ufficial knows about them and does the same thing....

1. my definition of dead coin is based on one thing:no nodes, i don't care about block explorers, exchange and other things.

The goal of the DigitalCredits project is to increase the number of SpaceCoin nodes and stake lots of coins. The block explorer they made also requires its own node, in case you weren't aware. Exchanges also require their own nodes to run their wallets, in case you weren't aware.

So what DigitalCredits is doing is bringing a dead coin back to life, by your own definition. It increases the number of altcoins. Why is he claiming to decrease the number of altcoins, when he's doing the exact opposite of that (and doing the opposite of everything else he says)?

BARR_Official, you have been trying to FUD Digital Credits since we first came out and your attempts have failed.

Not true. Actually you were fudding BARR 24/7 in C-Cex chat because you didn't think I would notice. You told everyone who would listen that BARR is worthless, that DGCS was already far more valuable than BARR, and that everyone who invested in BARR was an idiot who would lose all their money.

When I responded to you in C-Cex chat, it was only to answer your lies about BARR. I simply responded with the facts, and you had a public meltdown. You asked for DGCS to be delisted from C-Cex, and you told all DGCS holders to withdraw their coins.

I posted screencaps of those chats in your topic, and then you locked the topic and started a new one. Remember now?

Remember how you said you were going to war against BARR, and how you would "destroy my pussy faggot bitch ass on December 1st" or something like that?

How is that working out, so far? You still haven't burned any coins, nobody is buying Spacecoin, and you have a marketcap of 2 BTC? Well, actually about 90% of that figure is the coins still in the Yobit faucet which aren't really in circulation yet, so the marketcap is more like 0.2 BTC. I don't feel very destroyed.

BARR_Official, you have been trying to FUD Digital Credits since we first came out and your attempts have failed. But good luck with that. You currently burning a coin under active development which by the way is shady. The DEV of said coin don't even like you. I don't understand what your problem is with me or why you keep attacking me. But if that what makes your dick hard, keep trying. At the end of the day we will still be here. Good luck with your NXT asset!

somehow i totally agree with you, and there are even other proof of burn coins and who knows if barr_ufficial knows about them and does the same thing....

He thinks he owns proof of burn and any coin that comes out is copying his. Yet he as well as every other coin, including mine is a copy of bitcoin. He is attacking my coin and will continue to attack any new Proof of burn coin that comes out. I on the other hand am looking forward to more proof of burn coins. The more the better because there is a lot of dead coins out there and Digital Credits can not possibly rescue all the bag holders by ourselves. At the end of the day all his FUD is speculation and completely unproven. Will Digital credits succeed, who knows, I don't know that and neither dose he. The fact is we both have a different approach to our burns, He is going after active coins, I'm going after dead coins. I'm using an automated burn process and he is using a manual one. He claims his way is better. I don't see how attacking coins under active development meets the propose of Proof of burn. How he thinks I copied his terrible idea is beyond me. Digital Credits was designed to rescue holders of dead coins, not attack ones that are tring to make it work. We were also designed to have a life beyond our burn fund. We have PoW and PoS at a 1% inflation rate. Once his burn fund runs up what is it's purpose? Nothing, it will die like the coins he claims to be targeting.

He is attacking my coin and will continue to attack any new Proof of burn coin that comes out.

That's another lie from you, since CeriumCombine just announced that they're exchanging for burned altcoins and BARR accepted their offer to work together.

Quote

At the end of the day all his FUD is speculation and completely unproven.

Just the facts, ma'am. You're on record saying all the premined funds will be transparent on the block explorer, and that you won't be in control of those funds, but you've already sent 6 million with no way to track who they're given to.

Quote

I'm using an automated burn process and he is using a manual one.

You require users to send their coins to BTCPoolExchange, and all withdrawals from BTCPoolExchange have to be manually approved by the admin.

You require users to send their coins to BTCPoolExchange, and all withdrawals from BTCPoolExchange have to be manually approved by the admin.

No they don't. There is no record of the withdraw in question. It's FUD, most likely created by one of your alt accounts. Anyone can deposit coins on BTCPOOL and then withdraw them to see that what you are saying is complete bullshit lies!

You require users to send their coins to BTCPoolExchange, and all withdrawals from BTCPoolExchange have to be manually approved by the admin.

No they don't. There is no record of the withdraw in question. It's FUD, most likely created by one of your alt accounts. Anyone can deposit coins on BTCPOOL and then withdraw them to see that what you are saying is complete bullshit lies!

and anyway a exchange that asks for manual approval is totally bs and i agree again with intristin.... and anyway let's end this fight ok?

You require users to send their coins to BTCPoolExchange, and all withdrawals from BTCPoolExchange have to be manually approved by the admin.

No they don't. There is no record of the withdraw in question. It's FUD, most likely created by one of your alt accounts. Anyone can deposit coins on BTCPOOL and then withdraw them to see that what you are saying is complete bullshit lies!

Well I don't know about that other guy who reported the same facts, but I made my own withdrawal from BTCPoolExchange and it had to wait for manual admin approval.

Here is the record of that withdrawal: 6853eaebc5379685af912490ec5a544bb9e1188f6c04a9c832f7f5b591ff5429

So there are at least 2 users who had the same experience. How many users does BTCPoolExchange have? 0 people have ever traded DGCS there, even though it's the official host for your burns.

You require users to send their coins to BTCPoolExchange, and all withdrawals from BTCPoolExchange have to be manually approved by the admin.

No they don't. There is no record of the withdraw in question. It's FUD, most likely created by one of your alt accounts. Anyone can deposit coins on BTCPOOL and then withdraw them to see that what you are saying is complete bullshit lies!

Well I don't know about that other guy who reported the same facts, but I made my own withdrawal from BTCPoolExchange and it had to wait for manual admin approval.

Here is the record of that withdrawal: 6853eaebc5379685af912490ec5a544bb9e1188f6c04a9c832f7f5b591ff5429

So there are at least 2 users who had the same experience. How many users does BTCPoolExchange have? 0 people have ever traded DGCS there, even though it's the official host for your burns.

You require users to send their coins to BTCPoolExchange, and all withdrawals from BTCPoolExchange have to be manually approved by the admin.

No they don't. There is no record of the withdraw in question. It's FUD, most likely created by one of your alt accounts. Anyone can deposit coins on BTCPOOL and then withdraw them to see that what you are saying is complete bullshit lies!

Well I don't know about that other guy who reported the same facts, but I made my own withdrawal from BTCPoolExchange and it had to wait for manual admin approval.

Here is the record of that withdrawal: 6853eaebc5379685af912490ec5a544bb9e1188f6c04a9c832f7f5b591ff5429

So there are at least 2 users who had the same experience. How many users does BTCPoolExchange have? 0 people have ever traded DGCS there, even though it's the official host for your burns.

Ok mate time to set the record straight , 1 withdrawals go to a waiting area will they are processing this takes all of a few seconds it does say waiting for approval , but that is a automated process , its not instant as the system has to do some checks and balances , and not 1 person has said anything about any stuck withdrawals here or in support or in our chat and as for that transaction record check it on the block chain it was done on the 17th 11th 2015 and this was the time the withdrawal was submitted 11/17/2015 12:19:46 PM on our exchange and this is the time it hit the blockchain after the auto checks and balances 2015-11-17 12:20:31, took all of 45 seconds , mate go fud somewhere else check it on the blockchain yourself before fudding , if 45 seconds is to long for you mate blame satoshi!!

I was just pointing out another inaccuracy in intristin's many stories.

His burn process is fully centralized and requires trusting both him and the exchange.

He asks you to trust that he won't send the premined coins without following the rules, even though he's already broken that trust.

Then he asks you to trust the exchange with your altcoins, because you send them your coins and trust that they will burn those coins.

Then he asks you to trust the exchange again to distribute the DGCS according to the rules, even though they have 5 million coins and transfer them off-blockchain in a way that would easily allow dishonest transfers to remain hidden.

After that, DGCS cannot be traded without again trusting a centralized exchange to hold the coins, not to delist the coins, not to get hacked, and not to go out of business.

And he thinks that system is some advantage over BARR, which is traded on the decentralized NXT Asset Exchange, fully trustless on the blockchain, where your coins stay in your address even while they're in sell orders.

I was just pointing out another inaccuracy in intristin's many stories.

His burn process is fully centralized and requires trusting both him and the exchange.

He asks you to trust that he won't send the premined coins without following the rules, even though he's already broken that trust.

Then he asks you to trust the exchange with your altcoins, because you send them your coins and trust that they will burn those coins.

Then he asks you to trust the exchange again to distribute the DGCS according to the rules, even though they have 5 million coins and transfer them off-blockchain in a way that would easily allow dishonest transfers to remain hidden.

After that, DGCS cannot be traded without again trusting a centralized exchange to hold the coins, not to delist the coins, not to get hacked, and not to go out of business.

And he thinks that system is some advantage over BARR, which is traded on the decentralized NXT Asset Exchange, fully trustless on the blockchain, where your coins stay in your address even while they're in sell orders.

Yet it's wasn't another inaccuracy was it? It was you FUDing and grasping at straws. I have allready responded to your other complaints in other threads but you keep rehashing them. Dude, your starting to look desperate. But good luck with that. You claimed that you yourself had a withdrawal held up with a "admin approval" notice. Both admins came here put an end to your bullshit. Now your claiming you never complained. Honestly dude, give up on this FUDing, your making yourself look like an idiot.

And one final note before I put your stupid ass on my ignore list, Yes, Digital Credits has changed it's plans on many occasions. But we have never strayed form the original vision. That is what active coins under development do. They review what they are doing and make changes when they need to. That is something you can't do with a NXT asset because you have 0 control over the code. Digital Credits will continue to adjust as needed, and that is a good thing, not a bad one. You have not one shred of evidence that we have tried to scam or rip off anyone. All you do is speculate and lie. Good luck with that man. I am not your enmey, but you seem hell bend on making me one.

I was just pointing out another inaccuracy in intristin's many stories.

His burn process is fully centralized and requires trusting both him and the exchange.

He asks you to trust that he won't send the premined coins without following the rules, even though he's already broken that trust.

Then he asks you to trust the exchange with your altcoins, because you send them your coins and trust that they will burn those coins.

Then he asks you to trust the exchange again to distribute the DGCS according to the rules, even though they have 5 million coins and transfer them off-blockchain in a way that would easily allow dishonest transfers to remain hidden.

After that, DGCS cannot be traded without again trusting a centralized exchange to hold the coins, not to delist the coins, not to get hacked, and not to go out of business.

And he thinks that system is some advantage over BARR, which is traded on the decentralized NXT Asset Exchange, fully trustless on the blockchain, where your coins stay in your address even while they're in sell orders.

Yet it's wasn't another inaccuracy was it? It was you FUDing and grasping at straws. I have allready responded to your other complaints in other threads but you keep rehashing them. Dude, your starting to look desperate. But good luck with that. You claimed that you yourself had a withdrawal held up with a "admin approval" notice. Both admins came here put an end to your bullshit. Now your claiming you never complained. Honestly dude, give up on this FUDing, your making yourself look like an idiot.

It's their exchange, and you chose it as your official burn partner. Don't blame me for the fact that it tells every user that their withdrawals must be manually processed, and then you come here bragging about how your system is all automated and never manual.

I'm just pointing out the facts and discrepancies. It's no surprise that you can't get together with them and tell the same story, since you can't even keep your own stories straight by yourself.

Quote

Yes, Digital Credits has changed it's plans on many occasions.

Yes, you have repeatedly broken your promises about the most important aspects of your coin, such as how you will spend the 99% premine.

Quote

You have not one shred of evidence that we have tried to scam or rip off anyone.

I have your own words and actions as evidence. You said that any funds moving from the premine address, without being exchanged for burned coins, would be stolen funds. You said anyone could check the block explorer at any time, to make sure the funds weren't stolen. Then you stole them. That's the word you used.

It's their exchange, and you chose it as your official burn partner. Don't blame me for the fact that it tells every user that their withdrawals must be manually processed, and then you come here bragging about how your system is all automated and never manual.

I'm just pointing out the facts and discrepancies. It's no surprise that you can't get together with them and tell the same story, since you can't even keep your own stories straight by yourself.