Public Transport Should Be Free For Everyone Essay

All public transport should not be free and paid for by the government because there are more impotent things to pay for.

In my opinion, there are more important things that the government should support and fully cover, like hospitals, fire and police departments, and maybe even schools. They could even support child care or children hospitals more, because they can't be fully free. Transport is cheap enough as it is. The government can't pay for everything.

It is still cost to the public

If we eliminate cost to public transportation it will not be free. Free means without cost. Now when you get a free sample from a shop is it without cost? No, the shopkeeper still has to pay for the free samples. But if cost for public transportation is abolished then who will pay the bus drivers? Who will pay for the gas? Who will pay for the subway engineers? The taxpayers money will pay the bus drivers.The taxpayers money will pay for the gas. The taxpayers money will pay the engineers But you see why would someone want to pay for something they don’t use. Take San Francisco for example. 31% of people take some sort of public transit to work but why should the other 69% have to pay for it as well. It isn’t really fair. It is like subscribing to a magazine that someone else reads. But how would the taxpayers cope with that? They would start reading the magazine. They would start taking public transportation instead of their own private vehicle. But if everybody stopped driving their own private vehicles then there would be no automotive demand. Now if there is no automotive demand how are the auto companies going to cope with the loss of funds? They are going to lay off workers. Now if the 16 highest producing manufacturers (GM, Volkswagen, Ford, Toyota, Nissan, Peugeot, Honda, BMW, Suzuki, Renault, Fiat, Daimler AG, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Dongfeng, Tata) laid off their workers that would be 2,713,632 people out of work. So 2,713,632 people out of work what happens next? Worst case scenario public transportation becomes free, car manufacturers go bankrupt before they have time to begin to make buses, trains and trolleys, millions laid off, economy plummets, the world goes into a tailspin, and we all die. But how can we prevent this? How can we prevent imminent death at the hands of our own ignorance? We can continue to charge for public transportation.

Public transport should not be paid for by the governments because it cannot be afforded.

Public transport should not be free and paid for by the government because government cannot afford to pay for it unless other vital services to the general public are cut drastically. The possibility of free public transportation falls far below the necessities of other services and should be prioritized according to importance of maintaining a viable society.

Free public transport may be misused by people and may affect the financial status of government.

Present culture of paying for their travel is the best way of transport. If public travelling is made free it may be misused by some people. It may also affect the financial status of government. Even they may suffer from loss of income from transport department. Some may have unnecessary travel affecting others. It may lead to congestion and crowd in public transport.

Free public transport would get rid of so many jobs.

It is already hard enough finding jobs, it will be even worse if there is free public transport. The jobs of car sellers, car manufactures, ticket inspectors, ticket sellers, parking police (basically everyone in need of a job) will be destroyed. And we only recently got myki. It took so much money putting them into buses, trains and trams. It would be such a waste if we said we don't need them anymore.

I oppose free public transportation, because it reminds me of a government that pays for everything.

I believe that World War Two is the perfect example of why we should not have free public transportation. If you start making things free for everyone, then what is the point of paying for anything? Such is the case with free health care. It makes a person not want to work hard for anything.

I think that public transportation should be paid for by the people using it, because a lot of people who do not own a vehicle use it to go to and from work.

I do not think that the government should pay for public transportation. There are a lot of people who use public transportation to travel to and from work because they do not own a vehicle, or choose not to use it to go to work. I think that they have the income to pay for a ride to and from work. I think that if the government started to foot the bill for public transportation, then everyone would park their vehicles and take the bus to work, especially with the cost of gas now. This will only put a bigger burden on the taxpayers who are more than likely working class Americans who do drive to work, in their own vehicles, and have to purchase their own gas. This would not be at all fair to them.

No, public transportation should be made available by the government, but paid for on an as used basis.

Public transportation is already offered at a greatly reduced price than most private forms of transportation and needs to be paid for by those who use it the most. We shouldn't all have to pay for something that few of us use. Bus passes are relatively inexpensive but those revenues help keep public transportation moving.

Public transportation should not be paid for by the government.

People should have to pay for public transport. The government has enough expenses without having to pay for public transport. The government does not buy people's cars, so why should they pay to transport people who choose to use public transport. It would be nice though maybe if the government could do something to lower the cost of this type of transportation, then maybe more people would use it.

No way. I completely disagree; the government pays for enough already.

I don't think the government should pay for public transport. There are more important things like fire departments, hospitals and, police departments that the government should fully cover but doesn't in some places. I think people should pay for their own transport because not everything should be up to the government. Public transport is cheap enough for people to pay for it without the help of the government.

Question: Someone claim that public transport should be free of charge, others disagree, Discuss and give your opinion.

With the hot debate on globe warming in the past decade,peoples and countries pay more attention to it than ever. A number of increasing metropolitian people taking replacement of public transportations by the private cars as the main vehicles is the prevalent trend nowadays. Some individuals believe that public transportations should be free while others donot get along with it. In this essay, i will discuss both of the prons and cons for free charge of public transports.

Clearly, there are enormous advantages from free charge of public transports. At the first place, it creates less pollution and loads more passengers.Public transports need less energy and use less road space than crowed private cars. Also instead of building costly road infrastructure and parking areas. Secondly, if the public transportations were free, the low-income individuals would be able to take the jobs in places where they usually would not take because of the travel distance, workers would not cost highly for the expensive petrol and car. Finally, free charge of public transport will reduce overall consumption of oil and gasline. Decreasing carbon emmisions is a vital aim to most developing and developed countries. Meanwhile, reducing the amount of private car is a large process for lower air and noise contaminants.

Admittedly, economic factor shoul not be ignored by taxpayers and governments. First of all, public transport needs money to keep it running. Transportations system are not able to maintain it effiectively and efficiently without financial support. Second, start working things free for everyone might cause a person not want to work hard. For example, medicial free has made lots of people donot save much money for diseases as they used to. In addition, free charge of public transport will aggravate the burden to transportation department. People who donot need work also rush into the congested buses and trains at commute time for it doesn cost them nothing, but free time. As a consequence, it makes travel to work become more difficult to travelers.

In my opinion, public transport should be free or not is decided based on the government benefits and even the nation's benefits. What the government must do is make sure to find the most effective methodologies to combat the problems.