Kevin arrived late at the meeting. He objected to our consensus on the '''house rules''' proposal. We revisited the topic. Kevin expressed the following specific concerns about the rules:

Kevin arrived late at the meeting. He objected to our consensus on the '''house rules''' proposal. We revisited the topic. Kevin expressed the following specific concerns about the rules:

−

1. The notion of “activities of daily living” is ambiguous.

+

# The notion of “activities of daily living” is ambiguous.

−

2. Why do we suggest the use of specific storage locations if we can't protect those locations or enforce their use?

+

# Why do we suggest the use of specific storage locations if we can't protect those locations or enforce their use?

−

3. The food section is entirely outside Kevin's understanding of Noisebridge's general operation.

+

# The food section is entirely outside Kevin's understanding of Noisebridge's general operation.

−

4. Although Kevin is willing to accept prohibiting sleeping at Noisebridge, it is not without concern.

+

# Although Kevin is willing to accept prohibiting sleeping at Noisebridge, it is not without concern.

We discussed these objections and the proposal in general. Tom will back out the commit and move it to a branch of the main repo. Kevin volunteered to author the next version of the proposal. Future discussion is deferred to a future meeting.

We discussed these objections and the proposal in general. Tom will back out the commit and move it to a branch of the main repo. Kevin volunteered to author the next version of the proposal. Future discussion is deferred to a future meeting.

Kevin arrived late at the meeting. He objected to our consensus on the house rules proposal. We revisited the topic. Kevin expressed the following specific concerns about the rules:

The notion of “activities of daily living” is ambiguous.

Why do we suggest the use of specific storage locations if we can't protect those locations or enforce their use?

The food section is entirely outside Kevin's understanding of Noisebridge's general operation.

Although Kevin is willing to accept prohibiting sleeping at Noisebridge, it is not without concern.

We discussed these objections and the proposal in general. Tom will back out the commit and move it to a branch of the main repo. Kevin volunteered to author the next version of the proposal. Future discussion is deferred to a future meeting.

Linkreincarnate proposed that we remove Tom's administrator privileges on IRC and the mailing list because he is prone to abusing them. We discussed the topic. Tom substantially objected. Link notes that he thinks that Tom's objection to this proposal is in bad faith.

Linkreincarnate proposated that we ban Tom from Noisebridge because shutting down the mailing list is a violation of our anti-harassment policy. We did not discuss this proposal. Tom substantially objected. Linkreincarnate retracted his proposal.

Kevin and Linkreincarnate propose suspending Tom's membership because in the Noisebridge council of his bad-faith participation in Noisebridge's consensus process, as shown by his objection to the above proposal to remove Tom's administrator privileges. Madelynn substantially objected.

The Gnome Foundation is bringing a hackfest to Noisebridge. They'd like to run a short speaker series by and for folks who work all parts of the Linux stack. Tom volunteers to coordinate that with them.