nmm 22 4500ICPSR32521MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32521MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of Camera Use to Prevent Crime in Commuter Parking Facilities within the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Parking Facilities, 2004-2009
[electronic resource]
Nancy La Vigne
2015-02-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR32521NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study sought to identify what parking facility characteristics and management practices within the Washington Metro Transit Police (MTP) might create opportunities for crime, analyze those findings in relation to past crimes, and identify promising crime reduction strategies. The project consisted of three main research components: (1) identification of the
magnitude of car crime in commuter parking facilities and possible strategies for prevention of such car crime; (2) identification and implementation of a crime prevention strategy; and (3) evaluation of the strategy's effectiveness.
In partnership with the MTP staff, the research team created a blocked randomized experimental design involving 50 matched pairs of commuter
parking facilities in which a combination of live and dummy digital cameras were deployed, along with accompanying signage, at the exits of one randomly selected facility from each pairing. After a period of 12 months following camera implementation, the research team analyzed the impact of the cameras on crime occurring in and around Metro's parking facilities.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32521.v1
burglaryicpsrcommuting (travel)icpsrcrime controlicpsrlarcenyicpsrsurveillanceicpsrvandalismicpsrvehiclesicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemLa Vigne, NancyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32521Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32521.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26921MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26921MiAaIMiAaI
Anti-Terror Lessons of American Muslim Communities in Buffalo, New York, Houston, Texas, Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina, and Seattle, Washington, 2008-2009
[electronic resource]
David Schanzer
,
Charles Kurzman
,
Ebrahim Moosa
2015-02-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR26921NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In the aftermath of the attacks on September 11, 2001, and subsequent terrorist attacks elsewhere around the world, a key counterterrorism concern
was the possible radicalization of Muslims living in the United States. The purpose of the study was to examine and identify characteristics and practices of four American Muslim communities that have experienced varying levels of radicalization. The communities were selected because they were home to Muslim-Americans that had experienced isolated instances of radicalization. They were located in four distinct regions of the United States, and they each had distinctive histories and patterns of ethnic diversity.
This objective was mainly pursued through interviews of over 120 Muslims located within four different Muslim-American communities across the country (Buffalo, New York; Houston, Texas; Seattle, Washington; and Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina), a comprehensive review of studies an literature on Muslim-American communities, a review of websites and publications of Muslim-American organizations and a compilation of data on prosecutions of Muslim-Americans on violent terrorism-related offenses.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26921.v1
Muslimsicpsrperceptionsicpsrradicalismicpsrreligionicpsrstates (USA)icpsrterrorismicpsrNACJD II. Community StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemTPDRC I. TerrorismSchanzer, DavidKurzman, CharlesMoosa, EbrahimInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26921Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26921.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23880MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23880MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of CeaseFire, a Chicago-based Violence Prevention Program, 1991-2007
[electronic resource]
Wesley G. Skogan
2015-02-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR23880NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study evaluated CeaseFire, a program of the Chicago Project for Violence Prevention. The evaluation had both outcome and process components.
The outcome evaluation assessed the program's impact on shootings and killings in selected CeaseFire sites. Two types of crime data were compiled by the research team: Time Series Data (Dataset 1) and Shooting Incident Data (Dataset 2). Dataset 1 is comprised of aggregate month/year data on all shooting, gun murder, and persons shot incidents reported to Chicago police for CeaseFire's target beats and matched sets of comparison beats between January 1991 and December 2006, resulting in 1,332 observations. Dataset 2 consists of data on 4,828 shootings that were reported in CeaseFire's targeted police beats and in a matched set of comparison beats for two-year periods before and after the implementation of the program (February 1998 to April 2006).
The process evaluation involved assessing the program's operations and effectiveness. Researchers surveyed three groups of CeaseFire program stakeholders: employees, representatives of collaborating organizations, and clients.
The three sets of employee survey data examine such topics as their level of involvement with clients and CeaseFire activities, their assessments of their clients' problems, and their satisfaction with training and management practices. A total of 154 employees were surveyed: 23 outreach supervisors (Dataset 3), 78 outreach workers (Dataset 4), and 53 violence interrupters (Dataset 5).
The six sets of collaborating organization representatives data examine such topics as their level of familiarity and contact with the CeaseFire program, their opinions of CeaseFire clients, and their assessments of the costs and benefits of being involved with CeaseFire. A total of 230 representatives were surveyed: 20 business representatives (Dataset 6), 45 clergy representatives (Dataset 7), 26 community representatives (Dataset 8), 35 police representatives (Dataset 9), 36 school representatives (Dataset 10), and 68 service organization representatives (Dataset 11).
The Client Survey Data (Dataset 12) examine such topics as clients' involvement in the CeaseFire program, their satisfaction with aspects of life, and their opinions regarding the role of guns in neighborhood life. A total of 297 clients were interviewed.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23880.v1
aggressionicpsrbehavior modificationicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcommunity organizationsicpsrcommunity policingicpsrcrime mappingicpsrcrime patternsicpsrcrime reductionicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrcrisis interventionicpsrcultural attitudesicpsrcultural conflicticpsrfirearms deathsicpsrgang violenceicpsrgangsicpsrgun useicpsrhomicideicpsrmurdericpsroutreach programsicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsocial changeicpsrviolenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyNACJD II. Community StudiesSkogan, Wesley G.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23880Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23880.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32741MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32741MiAaIMiAaI
Protective Behaviors of Student Victims of Bullying
[electronic resource]A Rare Events Analysis of the 2009 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey
Jill Fleury Devoe
,
Lynn Bauer
2015-02-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR32741NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study explored whether bullied students (ages 12 through 18, in grades 6 through 12, enrolled during the current school year, and not homeschooled) engage in specific protective behaviors that inhibit learning, put other students' safety at risk, or foster a negative school climate. It also explored whether bullied students' behaviors varied by the type of bullying (direct, verbal, indirect, or cyber) endured. The researchers conducted secondary analyses of the NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMIZATION SURVEY: SCHOOL CRIME SUPPLEMENT, 2009 (ICPSR 28201), using rare events logistic regression, a technique that enables examination of the effects of several independent variables on a dichotomous dependent variable. The dataset produced contains a total of 65 variables, including 18 variables describing direct, verbal, indirect, and cyber bullying behaviors, 4 variables describing response behaviors by those bullied, and 28 variables describing student and school characteristics.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32741.v1
abuseicpsrabused childrenicpsradolescentsicpsrbullyingicpsreducational environmenticpsrschool age childrenicpsrschool attendanceicpsrschool violenceicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrstudent behavioricpsrtruancyicpsrvictimizationicpsrvictimsicpsryouthsicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsFleury Devoe, JillBauer, LynnInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32741Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32741.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20422MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20422MiAaIMiAaI
Estimating Human Trafficking into the United States [Phase I
[electronic resource]Development of a Methodology]
Heather J. Clawson
,
Mary Lane
,
Kevonne Small
2015-02-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR20422NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This research project developed and fully documented a method to estimate the number of females and males trafficked for the purposes of sexual and labor exploitation from eight countries (Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, and Venezuela) into the United States at the Southwest border. The model utilizes only open source data. This research represents the first phase of a two-phase project and
Provides a conceptual framework for identifying potential data sources to estimate the number of victims at different stages in trafficking
Develops statistical models to estimate the number of males and females at risk of being trafficked for sexual and labor exploitation from the eight countries, and the number of males and females actually trafficked for sex and labor
Incorporates into the estimation models the transit journey of trafficking victims from the eight countries to the southwest border of the United States
Designs the estimation models such that they are highly flexible and modular so that they can evolve as the body of data expands
Utilizes open source data as inputs to the statistical model, making the model accessible to anyone interested in using it
Presents preliminary estimates that illustrate the use of the statistical methods
Illuminates gaps in data sources.
The data included in this collection are the open source data which were primarily used in the models to estimate the number of males and females at risk of being trafficked.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20422.v1
exploitationicpsrhuman rightsicpsrhuman traffickingicpsrprostitutionicpsrsex traffickingicpsrsexual exploitationicpsrslaveryicpsrsmugglingicpsrvictimizationicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemClawson, Heather J.Lane, MarySmall, KevonneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20422Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20422.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30701MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30701MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Paired-Agency Linked Files, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR30701NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The new FJSRC linking system, implemented with the 2008
FJSRC data, includes sets of agency dyad linked files
created by improved methods of algorithmic matching. There
are both inter-agency linked files and intra-agency dyad
linked files.
The inter-agency matched pair files (or "dyads") permit
the linking of records from two different source agencies
for adjacent stages of federal case processing by providing
a crosswalk of the agency-specific key ID variables for the
two agency data files in the pair. These agency ID
variables (sequential ID numbers) may be used to link
records from one agency's standard analysis file (SAF) to
the next. The system enables users to track individual
defendant-cases through stages of the federal criminal
justice system (from arrest to prosecution, adjudication,
sentencing, and corrections) sequentially, one agency dyad
pair at a time. Each inter-agency paired linked file
relates the sequential record numbers (i.e. SEQ_NUM)
included in the SAFs from one agency/stage to another.
The intra-agency matched pair files (also dyads) permit
the same type of linking as described above except that the
linkages are within the same federal agency. The linkages
are to different stages of case processing withing a
particular agency.
The system covers all data years from 1994-2012.
These data are part of a series designed by the Urban
Institute (Washington, D.C.) and the Bureau of Justice
Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the
Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30701.v6
case processingicpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30701Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30701.v6 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35504MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35504MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Statutes for Counts of Convictions for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35504NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data contain records of statutes for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2012. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of counts of conviction for that defendant, and that total is recorded in the NOCOUNT variable. As an example, if a defendant has five counts of conviction (NOCOUNT=5), he or she will have five records in the current data. As it is possible for defendants to have multiple statutes applying to a single count of conviction, up to three statutes (STA1-STA3) are recorded for each count of conviction. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35504.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrtrial courtsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35504Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35504.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35503MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35503MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Guideline Computations for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35503NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data contain records of guideline computations and adjustments for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2012. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of guideline computations, which may or may not equal the total counts of conviction for that defendant, dependent upon the grouping rules of the particular guideline in question (see Section 3D1.2 of the guidelines manual). As an example, a defendant with five counts of drug trafficking will only have one guideline computation because each of the drug weights for each count are simply added together and only one calculation is necessary. However, if a defendant has five counts of bank robbery, he or she will have five separate guideline computations because bank robbery is considered to be a nongroupable offense. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35503.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrtrial courtsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35503Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35503.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35502MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35502MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35502NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data contain records of criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2012. It is estimated that over 90 percent of felony defendants in the federal criminal justice system are sentenced pursuant to the SRA of 1984. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. The Standardized Research Data File consists of variables from the Monitoring Department's database, which is limited to those defendants whose records have been furnished to the USSC by United States district courts and United States magistrates, as well as variables created by the OPA specifically for research purposes. The data include variables from the Judgement and Conviction (J and C) order submitted by the court, background and guideline information collected from the Presentencing Report (PSR), and the report on sentencing hearing in the Statement of Reasons (SOR). These data contain detailed information such as the guideline base offense level, offense level adjustments, criminal history, departure status, statement of reasons given for departure, and basic demographic information. These data are the primary analysis file and include only statute, guideline computation, and adjustment variables for the most serious offense of conviction. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35502.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrtrial courtsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrdefendantsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35502Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35502.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35501MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35501MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Arrests and Bookings for Federal Offenses, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35501NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of arrests and bookings for federal offenses in the United States during fiscal year 2012. The data were constructed from the United States Marshals Service (USMS) Prisoner Tracking System database. Records include arrests made by federal law enforcement agencies (including the USMS), state and local agencies, and self-surrenders. Offenders arrested for federal offenses are transferred to the custody of the USMS for processing, transportation, and detention. The Prisoner Tracking System contains data on all offenders within the custody of the USMS. The data file contains variables from the original USMS files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.1-1.3. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35501.v1
arrest recordsicpsrarrestsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfederal prisonersicpsroffendersicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IX. PoliceUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35501Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35501.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35500MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35500MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35500NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters received by United States attorneys or filed before the United States magistrates during fiscal year 2012. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Table 1.1. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35500.v1
federal courtsicpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35500Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35500.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35499MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35499MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases -- Terminated, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35499NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2012. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35499.v1
defendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35499Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35499.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35498MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35498MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters Concluded, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35498NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters concluded by United States attorneys or United States magistrates during fiscal year 2012. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.2-1.5. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35498.v1
defendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35498Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35498.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35497MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35497MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35497NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were terminated by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2012. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35497.v1
defendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35497Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35497.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35496MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35496MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35496NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were filed by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2012. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35496.v1
defendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35496Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35496.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35495MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35495MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Offenders in Prison at Year-End, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35495NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of sentenced offenders in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at year-end of fiscal year 2012. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35495.v1
offendersicpsrprison inmatesicpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional systemicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35495Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35495.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35494MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35494MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Offenders Released From Prison, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35494NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of sentenced offenders released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2012. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. Records of offenders who exit federal prison temporarily, such as for transit to another location, to serve a weekend sentence, or for health care, are not included in the exiting cohort. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35494.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional systemicpsrinmate release plansicpsroffendersicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35494Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35494.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35493MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35493MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Offenders Admitted to Prison, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35493NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of sentenced offenders committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2012. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35493.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional systemicpsrimprisonmenticpsroffendersicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35493Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35493.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35492MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35492MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35492NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2012. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35492.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrtrial courtsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35492Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35492.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35491MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35491MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35491NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2012 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35491.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrtrial courtsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35491Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35491.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35490MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35490MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35490NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2012. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35490.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrtrial courtsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35490Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35490.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35489MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35489MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants Charged in Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-02-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35489NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2012. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35489.v1
district courtsicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrdefendantsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35489Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35489.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06845MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06845MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1982
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2015-02-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6845NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use, as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked about problems resulting from their use of drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, their perceptions of the risks involved, and personal and family income sources and amounts. Half of the respondents were asked questions regarding substance use by close friends. Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity, educational level, job status, income level, veteran status, household composition, and population density. Youth respondents were also asked about time spent on homework and leisure activities.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06845.v3
alcoholicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescriptions drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsralcohol abuseicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD I. CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6845Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06845.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06844MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06844MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1985
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human
Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2015-02-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR6844NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of
prescription drugs among members of United States households aged 12
and older. Questions include age at first use as well as lifetime,
annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: cannabis,
cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco,
nonmedical use of prescription drugs including psychotherapeutics, and
polysubstance use. Respondents were also asked about health
conditions, substance abuse treatment history, problems resulting from
their use of drugs, alcohol, and tobacco, their perceptions of the
risks involved, and personal and family income sources and
amounts. Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity,
marital status, motor vehicle use, educational level, job status,
income level, veteran status, past and current household composition,
and population density.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06844.v3
alcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human
Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6844Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06844.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06128MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1993 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06128MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1991
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2015-02-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1993ICPSR6128NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug
use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide
quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on
the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, anabolic steroids, and tobacco
among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Data are
also provided on treatment for drug use and on illegal activities
related to drug use. Questions include age at first use, as well as
lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes:
marijuana, inhalants, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, alcohol, tobacco,
and nonmedical use of psychotherapeutics. Respondents were also asked
about problems resulting from their use of drugs, alcohol, and
tobacco, their perceptions of the risks involved, insurance coverage,
and personal and family income sources and amounts. Demographic data
include gender, race, ethnicity, educational level, job status, income
level, household composition, and population density.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06128.v2
cocaineicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6128Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06128.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06843MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06843MiAaIMiAaI
National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1979
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug Abuse
2015-02-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR6843NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This series measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions include age at first use, as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, nonmedical use of prescription drugs including psychotherapeutics, and polysubstance use. Respondents were also asked about their knowledge of drugs, perceptions of the risks involved, population movement, and sequencing of drug use. Fifty-seven percent of respondents were asked specific questions about their perceptions of the consequences of marijuana and alcohol use. The other 43 percent were asked about heroin use among friends. Demographic data include gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, income level, and household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06843.v4
heroinicpsrtobacco useicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrhallucinogensicpsrhouseholdsicpsrinhalantsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Drug AbuseInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6843Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06843.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34933MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34933MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2015-01-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34933NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2012 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34933.v2
employmenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalityNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeRCMD I. CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34933Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34933.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25923MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25923MiAaIMiAaI
Violence Against Athabascan Native Women in the Copper River Basin [Alaska], 2003
[electronic resource]
Randy H. Magen
,
Darryl S. Wood
2015-01-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25923NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
A participatory evaluation was used to examine factors associated with the prevalence and incidence of violence against Ahtna (Alaska Native) women in the Copper River basin of Alaska. Eligibility for participation in the study was limited to adult women over the age of 17 who were Ahtna shareholders or descendents of Ahtna shareholders and who lived in one of eight Ahtna villages (Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Cantwell, Copper Center, Gulkana, Gakona, Tazlina, and Chistochina) in the Copper River Basin of Alaska. The Ahtna Corporation provided research staff with a list of 185 women who met the eligibiltiy criteria. The list from the Ahtna Corporation did not include individuals born after 1972 who had not yet inherited shares in the Ahtna Corporation. With the assistance of subjects and village officials, researchers utilized snowball sampling to identify female Ahtna descendents over the age of 17 within the region. These subjects were recruited through face-to-face contact with project staff. Each of the 185 women on the list of eligible participants that researchers received from the Ahtna Corporation was sent a personal letter in 2003 inviting her to participate in the study. Included in the letter was the interview consent form. A few weeks after mailing, research staff contacted those women who had responded to the mailing to review methods for completing the survey and begin scheduling interviews. Study participants completed the Main Victimization Survey (Part 1) (n = 109), and if the respondent reported a violent incident, a Detailed Physical Assault Incident Report (Part 2) (n = 186) was completed for each offender that had assaulted the survey respondent. All respondents were paid 25 dollars for their participation in the survey and all of the interviewers were female. The Main Victimization Survey (Part 1) includes variables about physical violence the respondent experienced as an adult, how many times the violence occured, and the relationship between the respondent and the offender. The survey also included questions about cultural identity, involvement in the community, and the respondent's living conditions. Demographic variables include marital status, employment, income, and alcohol use. Questions were also included to gather respondents' opinions on health and social services delivery to Ahtna women in the Copper River region. The Detailed Physical Assault Incident Report (Part 2) includes variables about the victim/offender relationship, the time and place of the victimization, the amount of physical harm done in the victimization, whether alcohol or other drugs were involved in the victimization, whether formal assistance (i.e., police, medical treatment) was sought, the victim's perceptions of and satisfaction with the formal system response, the reasons for reporting or not reporting the offense, and if the victim attempted to obtain shelter from further victimization.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25923.v1
community involvementicpsrdomestic assaulticpsrdomestic violenceicpsrhealth care servicesicpsrNative Americansicpsrsocial attitudesicpsrsocial servicesicpsrviolence against womenicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMagen, Randy H.Wood, Darryl S.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25923Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25923.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25741MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25741MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance's Indian Alcohol and Substance Abuse Demonstration Programs, 2002-2006
[electronic resource]
Jennie R. Joe
2015-01-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25741NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Lummi Nation's Community Mobilization Against Drugs (CMAD) Initiative successfully achieved its four stated goals, which were to reduce illicit drug trafficking, reduce rates of substance use disorder and addiction, prevent drug abuse and underage drinking among youth, and mobilize the community in all aspects of prevention, intervention, and suppression of alcohol and drug use, drug abuse, and drug trafficking. The study also aimed to evaluate whether the outcomes of the demonstration project had application for other tribal communities confronting similar public safety issues related to substance abuse. Qualitative information from focus group interviews was collected. Six focus groups were held with individuals representing the following populations: service providers, policy makers, adult clients and family members, youth, traditional tribal healers, and community members. In addition to the focus groups, the evaluation team conducted an interview session with two traditional providers who preferred this format. All focus groups were conducted on-site at Lummi by two trained moderators from the evaluation team. There were six different sets of questions, one for each group. Each set included 9 to 10 open-ended questions, which addressed knowledge and impact of the Community Mobilized Against Drugs (CMAD) Initiative; issues or problems with the Initiative; how the community viewed its actions; the importance and inclusion of a cultural perspective (traditional healers and others) in implementing various aspects of the CMAD Initiative; and how the Initiative had affected work and networking capabilities, policy making decisions, and/or treatment. Participants were also asked to think about what they would like CMAD to address and about their perceptions and definitions of some of the service barriers they may be experiencing (clients, community, and/or youth). All of the focus groups were openly audio taped with full knowledge and agreement of the participants.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25741.v1
indigenous peoplesicpsrprogram evaluationicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtreatment programsicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrime controlicpsrcrime preventionicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug educationicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrdrug trafficicpsrdrug treatmenticpsralcohol abuseicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrNACJD II. Community StudiesNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemJoe, Jennie R.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25741Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25741.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22640MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22640MiAaIMiAaI
Participatory Evaluation of the Sisseton Wahepton Oyate Indian Alcohol and Substance Abuse Program Demonstration Project in the United States, 2006-2007
[electronic resource]
Jennie R. Joe
,
Jenny Chong
,
Robert Young
,
Darlene Lopez
2015-01-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR22640NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
A participatory evaluation model was used to evaluate the Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate (SWO) Indian Alcohol Substance Abuse Program (IASAP) project. The Community Survey (Part 1, Community Survey Quantitative Data) was used to obtain tribal members' perceptions related to the welfare of the community and their perceived levels of satisfaction with how their challenges and problems were being addressed. Data were collected between August 2006 and April 2007 using a convenience sample (n=100). Focus groups (Part 2, Focus Group Interview Qualitative Data) were held with key stake holders from five groups: past adult clients (n=6), parents of juvenile probationers (n=4), service providers and key project staff (n=4), elders (n=5), and policy-makers (n=2). The focus groups were held during three site visits between October 2006 and April 2007. Part 1 (Community Survey Quantitative Data) includes demographic variables such as gender, age, tribal enrollment status, number of years in the community, and experiences with criminal justice systems (both on and off the reservation). Other questions asked the respondent about major problems within the community (i.e., alcohol and drug use, violent crime, child and elder abuse or neglect, gang activity, and property crime) and what was being done to address the problem. Part 2 (Focus Group Interview Qualitative Data) variables were developed based on the type of focus group. Questions for past drug court participants and parents of the juvenile probationers focused on their experiences with the Indian Alcohol and Substance Abuse Program (IASAP). Questions for policy-makers, service providers, and program staff focused on the impact and sustainability of the IASAP. Questions for elders focused on issues related to culture, traditional practices, and the barriers to providing cultural and/or traditional services.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22640.v1
alcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsrdriving under the influenceicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrNative Americansicpsrpublic safetyicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtribal courtsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD I. Attitude SurveysJoe, Jennie R.Chong, JennyYoung, RobertLopez, DarleneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22640Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22640.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20402MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20402MiAaIMiAaI
Outcome Evaluation of the Comprehensive Indian Resources for Community and Law Enforcement (CIRCLE) Project With Data From Nine Tribes in the United States, 1995-2004
[electronic resource]
Stephen Brimley
,
Carrie Garrow
,
Miriam Jorgensen
,
Stewart Wakeling
2015-01-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR20402NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data for this study were collected in Phase 2, the outcome evaluation, of the Comprehensive Indian Resources for Community and Law Enforcement (CIRCLE) Project. The CIRCLE Project was launched in the late 1990s to strengthen tribal justice systems and, through effective tribal-level planning and strategic comprehensive approaches, to better equip Native American nations to combat the interlinked community problems of crime, violence, substance abuse, and juvenile delinquency. The Native American nations invited to participate in the CIRCLE Project were the Northern Cheyenne, the Ogling Sioux, and the Zuni. Part 1, Participant Data, contains data on each of the Native American nations. The Northern Cheyenne data include variables on juvenile arrests between 1995 and 2003 for intoxication, curfew violations, disorderly conduct, and total arrests. The Oglala Sioux data include variables on police force stability and court pleadings. The Zuni data include variables on arrests for simple assault, public intoxication, driving while intoxicated (DWI), endangerment, domestic violence, and total arrests between 2001 and 2004. Part 2, United States Department of Justice Funding Data, contains data on funding given to the Northern Cheyenne, the Oglala Sioux, the Zuni, and six comparison Native American nations for fiscal years 1998 to 2003.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20402.v1
crime control policiesicpsrcauses of crimeicpsrcrime control programsicpsrjuvenile justiceicpsrNative Americansicpsroutcome evaluationicpsrsocial issuesicpsrviolent crimeicpsrNACJD II. Community StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemBrimley, StephenGarrow, CarrieJorgensen, MiriamWakeling, StewartInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20402Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20402.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04540MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2006 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04540MiAaIMiAaI
Investigation and Prosecution of Homicide Cases in the United States, 1995-2000
[electronic resource]The Process for Federal Involvement
Phyllis J. Newton
,
Candace M. Johnson
,
Timothy M. Mulcahy
2015-01-20Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2006ICPSR4540NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study addressed questions related to potential geographic and racial disparity in the investigation and prosecution of federal capital cases and examined the process by which criminal cases, specially homicide cases, enter the federal criminal justice system. The primary method of data collection used was face-to-face interviews of key criminal justice officials within each district included in the study. Between 2000 and 2004, the researchers visited nine federal districts and interviewed all actors in the state and federal criminal justice systems who potentially would play a role in determining whether a homicide case was investigated and prosecuted in the state or federal systems. The study focused on homicide cases because federal homicides represented the offense of conviction in all capital case convictions in the federal system under the 2000 and 2001 DOJ reports (see U.S. Department of Justice, "The Federal Death Penalty System: A Statistical Survey (1988-2000)," Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, September 12, 2000, and U.S. Department of Justice, "The Federal Death Penalty System: Supplementary Data, Analysis and Revised Protocols for Capital Case Review," Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, June 6, 2001). In addition, federally related homicides are frequently involved with drug, gang, and/or organized crime investigations. Using 11 standardized interview protocols, developed in consultation with members of the project's advisory group, research staff interviewed local investigative agencies (police chief or his/her representative, section heads for homicide, drug, gang, or organized crime units as applicable to the agency structure), federal investigative agencies (Special Agent-in-Charge or designee, section heads of relevant units), local prosecutors (District Attorney, Assistant District Attorney, including the line attorneys and section heads), and defense attorneys who practiced in federal court. Due to the extensive number of issues to be covered with the U.S. Attorneys' Offices, interviews were conducted with: (1) the U.S. Attorney or designated representative, (2) section heads, and (3) Assistant U.S. Attorneys (AUSAs) within the respective sections. Because the U.S. Attorneys were appointed following the change in the U.S. Presidency in 2000, a slightly altered U.S. Attorney questionnaire was designed for interviews with the former U.S. Attorney who was in office during the study period of 1995 through 2000. In some instances, because the project focus was on issues and processes from 1995 through 2000, a second individual with longer tenure was chosen to be interviewed simultaneously when the head or section head was newer to the position. In some instances when a key respondent was unavailable during the site visit and no acceptable alternative could be identified, arrangements were made to complete the interview by telephone after the visit. The interviews included questions related to the nature of the local crime problem, agency crime priorities, perceived benefits of the federal over the local process, local and federal resources, nature and target of joint task forces, relationships between and among agencies, policy and agreements, definitions and understanding of federal jurisdiction, federal investigative strategies, case flow, and attitudes toward the death penalty.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04540.v1
capital punishmenticpsrstate courtsicpsrcase processingicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrdistrict courtsicpsrethnicityicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjurisdictionicpsrprosecutionicpsrraceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingNewton, Phyllis J.Johnson, Candace M.Mulcahy, Timothy M.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4540Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04540.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35517MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35517MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Survey of Jails, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-01-15Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35517NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ) is the only data collection effort that provides an annual source of data on local jails and jail inmates. Data on the size of the jail population and selected inmate characteristics are obtained every five to six years from the Census of Jails. In each of the years between the full censuses, a sample survey of jails is conducted to estimate
baseline characteristics of the nation's jails and inmates housed in these jails. The 2013 Annual Survey of Jails is the 26th such survey in a series begun in 1982. The ASJ supplies data on characteristics of jails such as admissions and releases, growth in the number of jail facilities, changes in their rated capacities and level of occupancy, growth in the population supervised in the community, changes in methods of community supervision, and crowding issues. The ASJ also provides information on changes in the demographics of the jail population, supervision status of persons held, and a count of non-citizens in custody. Starting in 2010, BJS enhanced the ASJ survey instruments to address topics on the number of convicted inmates that are unsentenced or sentenced and the number of unconvicted inmates awaiting trial/arraignment, or transfers/holds for other authorities. In order to reduce respondent burden, the ASJ no longer collects data on conviction status by sex. Also new to the survey, data are collected on jails' operational capacity and design capacity. Incorporating enhanced capacity measurements enables BJS to describe more accurately the variation and volatility of inmate bed space and crowding, especially as they relate to safety and security in jails.
To address more directly issues related to overcrowding and safety and security in jails, BJS started collecting data on staff and assaults against staff from the largest jails. In the modifications to the ASJ, starting in 2010, 335 jail jurisdictions (370 respondents) included with certainty in the ASJ sample survey were asked to provide additional information (forms CJ-5D or CJ-5DA) on the flow of inmates going through jails and the distribution of time served, staff characteristics and assaults on staff resulting in death, and inmate misconduct. The data presented in this study were collected in the Annual Survey of Jails, 2013. These data are used to track growth in the number of
jails and the capacities nationally, changes in the demographics of the
jail population and supervision status of persons held, the prevalence of
crowding issues, and a count of non-United States citizens within the jail
population. The data are intended for a variety of users, including
federal and state agencies, local officials in conjunction with jail
administrators, researchers, planners, and the public. The reference date
for the survey is June 30, 2013.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35517.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional systemicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrjail inmatesicpsrjailsicpsrpopulation characteristicsicpsrprobationicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35517Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35517.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34658MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34658MiAaIMiAaI
Second International Self-Reported Delinquency Study, 2005-2007
[electronic resource]
Dirk Enzmann
,
Ineke H. Marshall
,
Martin Killias
,
Josine Junger-Tas
,
Majone Steketee
,
Beata Gruszczynska
2015-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR34658NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD-2) was a large international collaborative study of delinquency and victimization of 12 to 15 year-old students in seventh, eighth, and ninth grade classrooms. The study was a school-based study that drew on random samples from either city level or national level. In general, the cross-national description of the prevalence and incidence of delinquent behavior allowed for the assessment of national crime rates by comparison with the crime rates of other countries. The study was conducted in 31 mostly European countries, the United States, Caribbean and South American countries. The primary research questions explored included:
Is juvenile delinquency normal, ubiquitous, and transitional?
Is there a pattern of similarity in the offending behavior of juveniles across countries or are there any important differences? Descriptive comparisons of crime rates will call for explanations, especially if differences are observed.
What are the national socio-economic or cultural differences, or the characteristics of legal or criminal policies that can explain such differences?
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34658.v2
crime reportingicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrinternational crime statisticsicpsrjuvenile victimsicpsrpolice recordsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrvictimizationicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyEnzmann, DirkH. Marshall, InekeKillias, MartinJunger-Tas, JosineSteketee, MajoneGruszczynska, BeataInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34658Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34658.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35608MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35608MiAaIMiAaI
National Prisoner Statistics, 1978-2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-01-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35608NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Prisoner Statistics (NPS) data collection began in 1926 in response to a congressional mandate to gather information on persons incarcerated in state and federal prisons. Originally under the auspices of the United States Census Bureau, the collection moved to the Bureau of Prisons in 1950, and then in 1971 to the National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, the precursor to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) which was established in 1979. Since 1979, the Census Bureau has been the NPS data collection agent. The NPS is administered to 51 respondents. Before 2001, the District of Columbia was also a respondent, but responsibility for housing the District of Columbia's sentenced prisoners was transferred to the federal Bureau of Prisons, and by yearend 2001 the District of Columbia no longer operated a prison system. The NPS provides an enumeration of persons in state and federal prisons and collects data on key characteristics of the nation's prison population. NPS has been adapted over time to keep pace with the changing information needs of the public, researchers, and federal, state, and local governments.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35608.v1
correctional systemicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrHIVicpsroffendersicpsrparoleicpsrprison inmatesicpsrstate correctional facilitiesicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35608Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35608.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35631MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2015 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35631MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Probation Survey, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2015-01-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2015ICPSR35631NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2013 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2013, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2013. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35631.v1
criminal justice systemicpsroffensesicpsrprobationicpsrprobationersicpsrsentencingicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35631Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35631.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31281MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31281MiAaIMiAaI
Collecting DNA from Juveniles in 30 U.S. States, 2009-2010
[electronic resource]
Julie Samuels
,
Allison Dwyer
,
Robin Halberstadt
,
Pamela Lachman
2014-12-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31281NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examined the laws, policies, and practices
related to juvenile DNA collection, as well as their implications for the juvenile and criminal justice systems. DNA evidence proved valuable in solving crimes, which motivated a concerted effort to expand the categories of offenders who provided DNA samples for analysis and inclusion in the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)-operated national database.
State requirements for DNA collection, which initially focused on adult offenders convicted of sexual or violent offenses, expanded to include other categories of convicted felons, convicted misdemeanants, arrestees, and juveniles. In 30 states, certain categories of juveniles handled in the juvenile justice system must now provide DNA samples. The study was designed to explore the practice and implications of collecting DNA from juveniles and addressed the following questions:
How have state agencies, juvenile justice agencies and state laboratories implemented juvenile DNA collection laws?
What were the number and characteristics of juveniles with profiles included in CODIS?
How have juvenile profiles in CODIS contributed to public safety or other justice outcomes?
What improvements to policies and practices needed to be made?
To examine these questions, researchers at the Urban Institute: (1) systematically reviewed all state DNA statutes; (2) conducted semi-structured interviews with CODIS lab representatives in states that collect DNA from juveniles to understand how the laws were implemented; (3) collected and analyzed descriptive data provided by these labs on the volume and characteristics of juvenile profiles in CODIS; (4) conducted semi-structured interviews with juvenile and criminal justice stakeholders in five case study states; and (5) convened a meeting of federal officials and experts from the forensic and juvenile justice committees to explore the broader impacts of juvenile DNA collection.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31281.v1
crime laboratoriesicpsrDNA fingerprintingicpsrjuvenile justiceicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrlaw enforcement agenciesicpsrpolicyicpsrrecords managementicpsrstate regulationsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencySamuels, JulieDwyer, AllisonHalberstadt, RobinLachman, PamelaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31281Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31281.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35629MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35629MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Parole Survey, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
2014-12-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35629NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2013 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and December 31, 2013, and a count of the number entering and leaving supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35629.v1
causes of deathicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsroffensesicpsrparoleicpsrparoleesicpsrsentencingicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35629Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35629.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09028MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1997 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09028MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]
[electronic resource]1975-1997
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-12-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1997ICPSR9028NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic
nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
the criminal justice system. By 1985, there were approximately 17,000
law enforcement agencies contributing reports either directly or
through their state reporting programs. Each year, this information is
reported in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by
Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide
Reports (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. Offenses Known
and Clearances by Arrest data files include monthly data on the number
of Crime Index offenses reported and the number of offenses cleared by
arrest or other means. The counts include all reports of Index Crimes
(excluding arson) received from victims, officers who discovered
infractions, or other sources. The Property Stolen and Recovered data
are collected on a monthly basis by all UCR contributing agencies.
These data, aggregated at the agency level, report on the nature of
the crime, the monetary value of the property stolen, and the type of
property stolen. Similar information regarding recovered property is
also included in the data. The Supplementary Homicide Reports provide
incident-based information on criminal homicides. Further, the data,
provided monthly by UCR agencies, contain information describing the
victim of the homicide, the offender, and the relationship between
victim and offender. The Police Employee (LEOKA) Data provide
information about law enforcement officers killed or assaulted (hence
the acronym, LEOKA) in the line of duty. The variables created from
the LEOKA forms provide in-depth information on the circumstances
surrounding killings or assaults, including type of call answered,
type of weapon used, and type of patrol the officers were on.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09028.v6
arrest recordsicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrhomicideicpsrjustifiable homicideicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrpolice deathsicpsrpolice officersicpsrstolen propertyicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9028Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09028.v6 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03355MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03355MiAaIMiAaI
Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-12-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3355NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994
is a database containing information on each of 38,624 sampled
prisoners released from prisons in 15 states in 1994 and tracked for
three years following their release. The majority of the database
consists of information on each released prisoner's entire officially
recorded criminal history (before and after the 1994 release). Sources
for criminal history information are state and FBI automated RAP
("Records of Arrests and Prosecutions") sheets, which contain records
of arrests, adjudications, and sentences. The study is the second
major recidivism study conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
The first study, RECIDIVISM AMONG RELEASED PRISONERS, 1983: [UNITED
STATES] (ICPSR 8875), tracked over 16,000 prisoners released in 11
states in 1983 for three years. These two studies are the
closest approximation to "national" recidivism studies in the United
States. They are distinguished by their large sample size (over 16,000
released prisoners in the first study, 38,624 in the second),
geographic breadth of coverage (11 states in the first study, 15 in
the second), length of prospective tracking (three years from date of
release in both studies), ability to track the movement of released
prisoners across state boundaries (both studies), and multiple
measures of recidivism (both studies). Demographic data include race,
ethnicity, sex, and date of birth.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03355.v8
conviction recordsicpsrcriminal historiesicpsroffensesicpsrrecidivismicpsrarrest recordsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3355Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03355.v8 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35343MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35343MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2012
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-12-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35343NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35343.v1
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35343Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35343.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35347MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35347MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-12-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35347NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2013. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2013, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2013.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35347.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35347Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35347.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35346MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35346MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2013
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-12-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35346NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35346.v1
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35346Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35346.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34980MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34980MiAaIMiAaI
National Crime Victimization Survey
[electronic resource]School Crime Supplement, 2013
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-12-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34980NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The primary purpose of the School Crime Supplement (SCS) is to obtain additional information about school-related victimizations so that policymakers; academic researchers; practitioners at the federal, state, and local levels; and special interest groups who are concerned with crime in schools can make informed decisions concerning policies and programs. The SCS asks questions related to students' experiences with, and perceptions of crime and safety at school, including preventive measures employed by schools; students' participation in after school activities; students' perception of school rules and enforcement of these rules; the presence of weapons, drugs, alcohol, and gangs in school; student bullying; hate-related incidents; and attitudinal questions relating to the fear of victimization at school. These responses are linked to the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) survey instrument responses for a more complete understanding of the individual student's circumstances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34980.v1
crime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdrugsicpsreducational environmenticpsrfear of crimeicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsroffensesicpsrschool securityicpsrschool violenceicpsrstudent attitudesicpsrcrimeicpsrcrime in schoolsicpsrproperty crimesicpsrreactions to crimeicpsrrobberyicpsrschool attendanceicpsrstudent behavioricpsrvandalismicpsrvictimizationicpsrvictimsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34980Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34980.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35340MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35340MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2011
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-11-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35340NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35340.v1
court casesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrappeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35340Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35340.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35344MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35344MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-11-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35344NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2012. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2012, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2012.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35344.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35344Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35344.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35345MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35345MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-11-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35345NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2012, and September 30, 2013, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the highest occurrences of each iterating variable. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35345.v1
sentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35345Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35345.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35342MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35342MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-11-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35342NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2011, and September 30, 2012, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the highest occurrences of each iterating variable. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35342.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35342Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35342.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32282MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32282MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Calendar Data, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-11-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR32282NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Calendar data files are comprised of 47 total parts spread across 13 distinct topical domains.
Academic Achievement
Antisocial Activity
Community-Based Services
Contact With the Justice System
Court Monitoring
Gainful Activity
Head Injury
Living Situation
Making and Spending Money
Medication
Out of Community Placement
Romance
School
Each topical domain contains multiple reference periods for looking at the topic across the entire data collection period of the study.
Users who request these restricted data should first review the documentation available from NAHDAP (user guide and frequency codebooks) and from the Pathways Website (domain content codebooks). This review will help determine which specific datasets will be needed for your project. The "Research Description" in ICPSR's Data Access Request System (IDARS) must include a specific explanation of why you need each topic domain selected on the "Data Selection" page in IDARS. Most projects should only require one reference period per topic domain being requested. Data requests for all reference periods within a given domain will not be approved without a satisfactory explanation of why all of the reference periods are required for your project. Since the Calendar data collection is very extensive and Restricted Data Use Agreements are only for 2 years, data requests are not expected to need the entire Calendar data collection.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654) and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
Respondents were enrolled and baseline interviews conducted from November 2000 to January 2003. Follow-up interviews were then scheduled with the respondents at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 84 months past their baseline interview.
The enrolled youth were at least 14 years old and under 18 years old at the time of their committing offense and were found guilty of a serious offense (predominantly felonies, with a few exceptions for some misdemeanor property offenses, sexual assault, or weapons offenses).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32282.v2
academic achievementicpsrcommunity involvementicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsremploymenticpsrfamily lifeicpsrfriendshipsicpsrhousehold compositionicpsrincomeicpsrinjuriesicpsrinterpersonal relationsicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmedicationsicpsrpersonal adjustmenticpsrpsychological evaluationicpsrpsychosocial assessmenticpsrreligionicpsrservice providersicpsrsocial behavioricpsrsubstance abuseicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32282Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32282.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35509MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35509MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-11-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35509NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2013 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35509.v1
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalityNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35509Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35509.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26241MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26241MiAaIMiAaI
Assessment of Defense and Prosecutorial Strategies in Terrorism Trials in the United States, 1980-2004
[electronic resource]
Brent L. Smith
,
Christopher A. Shields
,
Kelly R. Damphousse
2014-11-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR26241NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study created a flat-file database of information regarding defendants who were referred to United States Attorneys by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) following official terrorism investigations between 1980 and 2004. Its ultimate goal was to provide state and federal prosecutors with empirical information that could assist federal and state prosecutors with more effective strategies for prosecution of terrorism cases. The results of this study enhanced the existing 78 variables in the AMERICAN TERRORISM STUDY, 1980-2002 (ICPSR 4639) database by adding the 162 variables from the Prosecution and Defense Strategies (PADS) database. The variables in the PADS database track information regarding important pleadings, motions, and other key events that occur in federal terrorism trials; the PADS variables measure the strategies used by legal counsel as well as other legal nuances.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26241.v1
case processingicpsrcourt casesicpsrcourtroom proceedingsicpsrcrime preventionicpsrdefense (law)icpsrdefense counselicpsrdistrict courtsicpsrFBIicpsrfederal prisonersicpsrindictmentsicpsrnational securityicpsrprosecuting attorneysicpsrsentencingicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist attacksicpsrterrorist prosecutionicpsrterroristsicpsrtrial proceduresicpsrtrialsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingTPDRC I. TerrorismICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSmith, Brent L.Shields, Christopher A.Damphousse, Kelly R.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26241Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26241.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35483MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35483MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Arson, 1983
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-11-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35483NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic
nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
the criminal justice system. Seven main classifications of crime were
chosen to gauge fluctuations in the overall volume and rate of
crime. These seven classifications that eventually became known as the
Crime Index included the violent crimes of murder and non-negligent
manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, and the
property crimes of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft.
By congressional mandate, arson was added as the eighth Index offense
in 1979. Arson is defined as any willful or malicious burning or
attempt to burn, with or without intent to defraud, a dwelling house,
public building, motor vehicle or aircraft, personal property of
another, etc. The arson data files include monthly data on the number
of arson offenses reported and the number of offenses cleared by
arrest or other means. The counts include all reports of arson
received from victims, officers who discovered infractions, or other
sources.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35483.v1
law enforcementicpsrarrestsicpsrarsonicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsroffensesicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35483Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35483.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30961MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30961MiAaIMiAaI
The Effectiveness of Coordinated Outreach in Intimate Partner Violence Cases in Denver, Colorado 2007 to 2009
[electronic resource]
Anne DePrince
,
Joanne Belknap
,
Angela Gover
2014-11-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR30961NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In collaboration with community- and system-based partners, the current study used an experimental design to test the impact of phone outreach from community-based agencies to women exposed to Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) compared to phone referrals provided by system-based unit (i.e., the Victim Assistance Unit of the DPD or the City Attorney's Office) in a racially and ethnically diverse sample of women whose cases have come to the attention of the criminal justice system. The phone outreach was informed by an interdisciplinary team involving both system- and community-based team members. Participants, who were randomly selected to receive outreach or treatment-as-usual, were interviewed at three time points: after an incident of IPV was reported to the police (T1), 6 months after T1, and 12 months after T1. The study addressed three primary roles. First, investigators evaluated the effectiveness of a coordinated, community-based outreach program in improving criminal justice and victim safety and empowerment outcomes for IPV victims using a longitudinal, randomized control design. Second, victim and case characteristics that moderated outcomes were identified. Third, the influence of spatial characteristics on criminal justice outcomes was evaluated.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30961.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrdomestic assaulticpsrdomestic violenceicpsrintimate partner violenceicpsroutreach programsicpsrpost-traumatic stress disordericpsrspouse abuseicpsrvictim safetyicpsrvictim servicesicpsrvictimizationicpsrviolence against womenicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenDePrince, AnneBelknap, JoanneGover, AngelaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30961Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30961.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34305MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34305MiAaIMiAaI
National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS)
[electronic resource]General Population Survey Raw Data, 2010
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
2014-11-06Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34305NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) is an ongoing nationally representative survey that assessed experiences of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence among adult women and men in the United States and for each individual state. The survey focused exclusively on violence and collected information about
Sexual violence by any perpetrator, including information related to rape, being made to penetrate someone else, sexual coercion, unwanted sexual contact, and non-contact unwanted sexual experiences
Stalking, including the use of newer technologies such as text messages, emails, monitoring devices (e.g., cameras and GPS, or global positioning system devices), by perpetrators known and unknown to the victim
Physical violence by an intimate partner
Psychological aggression by an intimate partner, including information on expressive forms of aggression and coercive control
Control of reproductive or sexual health by an intimate partner
In addition to collecting lifetime and 12 month prevalence data on sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence, the survey collects information on the age at the time of the first victimization, demographic characteristics of respondents, demographic characteristics of perpetrators (age, sex, race/ethnicity) and detailed information about the context in which these types of violence occur.
The primary objectives of the survey are to describe the prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence in the United States; who is most likely to experience these forms of violence; the context in which sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence are experienced; and the consequences and impacts of these forms of violence.
The data file contains 18,957 cases and 26,114 variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34305.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrintimate partner violenceicpsrmedical historyicpsrsexual assaulticpsrstalkingicpsrvictimizationicpsrviolence against womenicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and ControlInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34305Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34305.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35257MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35257MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Parole Survey, 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-10-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35257NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2012 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the
total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and
December 31, 2012, and a count of the number entering and leaving
supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and type of offense. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35257.v1
causes of deathicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsroffensesicpsrparoleicpsrparoleesicpsrsentencingicpsrNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35257Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35257.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35341MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35341MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-10-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35341NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2011. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2011, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2010, through September 30, 2011.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35341.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35341Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35341.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35339MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35339MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-10-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35339NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2010, and September 30, 2011, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the highest occurrences of each iterating variable. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35339.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35339Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35339.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35336MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35336MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2010
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-10-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35336NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2009, and September 30, 2010, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two or more files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the highest occurrences of each iterating variable. Part 2, Supplementary Data Part 1, and Part 3, Supplementary Data Part 2, include the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35336.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35336Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35336.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28602MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28602MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2009
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-10-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR28602NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2009, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the highest occurrences of each iterating variable. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28602.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrcriminal offensesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28602Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28602.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35218MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35218MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring the Future
[electronic resource]A Continuing Study of American Youth (12th-Grade Survey), 2013
Lloyd D. Johnston
,
Jerald G. Bachman
,
Patrick M. O'Malley
,
John E. Schulenberg
2014-10-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35218NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This survey of 12th-grade students is part of a series that
explores changes in important values, behaviors, and lifestyle
orientations of contemporary American youth. Students are randomly
assigned to complete one of six questionnaires, each with a different
subset of topical questions, but all containing a set of "core"
questions on demographics and drug use. There are about 1,400
variables across the questionnaires. Drugs covered by this survey
include tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, hashish,
prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, LSD,
hallucinogens, amphetamines (stimulants), Ritalin (methylphenidate),
Quaaludes (methaqualone), barbiturates (tranquilizers), cocaine, crack
cocaine, GHB (gamma hydroxy butyrate), ecstasy, methamphetamine, and
heroin. Other topics include attitudes toward religion, changing roles
for women, educational aspirations, self-esteem, exposure to drug
education, and violence and crime (both in and out of school).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35218.v1
alcoholicpsrattitudesicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug educationicpsrdrug useicpsreducational objectivesicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrgender rolesicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrlifestylesicpsrprescription drugsicpsrreligious attitudesicpsrself esteemicpsrsocial changeicpsrtobacco useicpsrvaluesicpsryouthsicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsJohnston, Lloyd D.Bachman, Jerald G.O'Malley, Patrick M.Schulenberg, John E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35218Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35218.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35166MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35166MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring the Future
[electronic resource]A Continuing Study of American Youth (8th- and 10th-Grade Surveys), 2013
Lloyd D. Johnston
,
Jerald G. Bachman
,
Patrick M. O'Malley
,
John E. Schulenberg
2014-10-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35166NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These surveys of 8th- and 10th-grade students are part of a
series that explores changes in important values, behaviors, and
lifestyle orientations of contemporary American youth. Students in
each grade are randomly assigned to complete one of four
questionnaires, each with a different subset of topical questions but
containing a set of "core" questions on demographics and drug
use. There are more than 450 variables across the questionnaires.
Drugs covered by this survey include amphetamines (stimulants),
barbiturates (tranquilizers), other prescription drugs,
over-the-counter medications, tobacco, smokeless tobacco, alcohol,
inhalants, steroids, marijuana, hashish, LSD, hallucinogens, cocaine,
crack, ecstasy, methamphetamine, and injectable drugs such as heroin.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35166.v1
religious attitudesicpsrself esteemicpsrsocial changeicpsrtobacco useicpsrvaluesicpsryouthsicpsralcoholicpsrattitudesicpsrcrimeicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdrug educationicpsrdrug useicpsreducational objectivesicpsrfamily backgroundicpsrgender rolesicpsrhigh school studentsicpsrhuman behavioricpsrlifestylesicpsrprescription drugsicpsrRCMD IX. Minority PopulationsNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.C.1. Social Institutions and Behavior, Socialization, Students, and Youth, United StatesNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramJohnston, Lloyd D.Bachman, Jerald G.O'Malley, Patrick M.Schulenberg, John E.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35166Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35166.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34943MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34943MiAaIMiAaI
State Court Statistics, 2010
[electronic resource]
National Center for State Courts
2014-10-21Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34943NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection provides comparable measures of state
appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are
tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the
Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court
Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of
count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload.
Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state
appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in
state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. The trial caseload consists of civil, domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, and traffic violation cases. The appellate caseload consists of appeal by right, appeal by permission, death penalty, and original proceeding/other appellate matter cases.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34943.v1
appellate courtsicpsrcase processingicpsrcaseloadsicpsrcourt casesicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrlegal appealsicpsrstate courtsicpsrstatistical dataicpsrtrial courtsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNational Center for State CourtsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34943Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34943.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35165MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35165MiAaIMiAaI
National Crime Victimization Survey, Concatenated File, 1992-2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-10-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35165NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Series, previously called the National Crime Surveys (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization through an ongoing survey of a nationally-representative sample of residential addresses since 1973. The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes include rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes include burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. Each respondent is asked a series of screen questions designed to determine whether she or he was victimized during the six-month period preceding the first day of the month of the interview. A "household respondent" is also asked to report on crimes against the household as a whole (e.g., burglary, motor vehicle theft). The data include type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime, relationship between victim and offender, characteristics of the offender, self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions, consequences of the victimization, type of property lost, whether the crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting, and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Basic demographic information such as age, race, gender, and income is also collected, to enable analysis of crime by various subpopulations.
This dataset represents the concatenated version of the NCVS on a collection year basis for 1992-2013. A collection year contains records from interviews conducted in the 12 months of the given year. Under the collection year format, victimizations are counted in the year the interview is conducted, regardless of the year when the crime incident occurred.
For additional information, please see the documentation for the data from the most current year of the NCVS, ICPSR Study 35164.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35165.v1
assaulticpsrauto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcrimeicpsrcrime costsicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrrapeicpsrreactions to crimeicpsrrobberyicpsrsex offensesicpsrvandalismicpsrvictimizationicpsrvictimsicpsrFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35165Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35165.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35164MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35164MiAaIMiAaI
National Crime Victimization Survey, 2013
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-10-17Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35164NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Series, previously called the National Crime Surveys (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization through an ongoing survey of a nationally-representative sample of residential addresses since 1973. The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes include rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes include burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. Each respondent is asked a series of screen questions designed to determine whether she or he was victimized during the six-month period preceding the first day of the month of the interview. A "household respondent" is also asked to report on crimes against the household as a whole (e.g., burglary, motor vehicle theft). The data include type of crime, month, time, and location of the crime, relationship between victim and offender, characteristics of the offender, self-protective actions taken by the victim during the incident and results of those actions, consequences of the victimization, type of property lost, whether the crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting, and offender use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Basic demographic information such as age, race, gender, and income is also collected, to enable analysis of crime by various subpopulations. This version of the NCVS, referred to as the collection year, contains records from interviews conducted in the 12 months of the given year.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35164.v1
auto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcrimeicpsrcrime costsicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrassaulticpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrrapeicpsrreactions to crimeicpsrrobberyicpsrsex offensesicpsrvandalismicpsrvictimizationicpsrvictimsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsNACJD X. VictimizationUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35164Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35164.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR23326MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR23326MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, 1983
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-10-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR23326NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data provide information on the number of arrests
reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Uniform Crime
Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United
States. Although not as well known as the "Crimes Known to the Police" data drawn from the Uniform crime report's Return A form, the arrest reports by age, sex, and race provide valuable data on 43 offenses including violent, drug, gambling, and larceny crimes.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23326.v2
arrestsicpsrarsonicpsrassaulticpsrauto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcountiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrfraudicpsrillegal gamblingicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmurdericpsroffensesicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrsex offensesicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrvandalismicpsrweaponsicpsrNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)23326Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR23326.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29430MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29430MiAaIMiAaI
Indirect Impacts of Community Policing, Jersey City, NJ, 1997-1999
[electronic resource]
David Weisburd
,
Laura Wyckoff
,
Justin Ready
,
John Eck
,
Joshua Hinkle
,
Frank Gajewski
2014-10-08Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR29430NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study attempted to measure spatial displacement or diffusion of crime to areas near the targeted sites of police intervention. Data were drawn from a controlled study of displacement and diffusion in Jersey City, New Jersey. Two sites with substantial street-level crime and disorder were targeted and carefully monitored during an experimental period. Two neighboring areas were selected as "catchment areas" from which to assess immediate spatial displacement or diffusion. Intensive police interventions were applied to each target site but not to the catchment areas. More than 6,000 20-minute social observations were conducted in the target and catchment areas. Physical observations of the areas were conducted before, during, and after the interventions as well. These data were supplemented by interviews with local residents and ethnographic field observations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29430.v1
crime patternsicpsrcrime preventionicpsrdrug related crimesicpsrpolice interventionicpsrprostitutionicpsrviolent crimeicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyWeisburd, DavidWyckoff, LauraReady, JustinEck, JohnHinkle, JoshuaGajewski, FrankInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29430Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29430.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34671MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34671MiAaIMiAaI
Alabama Sentencing Simulation Model, 1998-2003
[electronic resource]
John Speir
,
Lynda Flynt
,
Bennet Wright
,
Melisa Morrison
2014-09-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34671NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Prior to 2003, the State of Alabama had no formal methodology to forecast prison populations, including a simulation model or statistical time-series and forecasting methods. Instead, the Alabama Department of Corrections relied on percent growth models, using the existing prison population to forecast future statewide prison populations. As Alabama moved toward a structured sentencing system, more precision was needed to investigate the impact statewide sentencing reform would have on the prison population. Adding to the need for more precise forecast methods, the Alabama Sentencing Commission intended to incorporate Virginia worksheet-style sentencing guidelines into its sentencing reform efforts. The Virginia sentencing guidelines uses offender and offense factors identified with statistical models and weights to guide sentence recommendations. Alabama require an analytical tool to guide the Commission during development of such a complicated sentencing system. To shepherd this process, the simulation model development project was undertaken which consisted of three phases;
The development of a baseline projection of current practices for later comparison with projections made following implementation of the sentencing standards;
Incorporating the initial sentencing standards into the simulation model; and
Integrating disparate modules together into a user-friendly model interface.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34671.v1
sentencing guidelinesicpsrsimulation modelsicpsrcorrectionsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrjudicial processicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingSpeir, JohnFlynt, LyndaWright, BennetMorrison, MelisaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34671Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34671.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32004MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32004MiAaIMiAaI
Evaluation of the Community Supervision Mapping System for Released Prisoners in Rhode Island, 2008-2010
[electronic resource]
Jim Lucht
,
Nancy G. La Vigne
2014-09-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR32004NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study evaluated the Community Supervision Mapping System (CSMS), an online geospatial tool that enables users to map the formerly incarcerated and others on probation, along with related data such as service provider locations and police districts. Probation officers in the state of Rhode Island were surveyed a few weeks before and 18 months after the implementation of CSMS. A total of 56 probation officers participated in the first wave of the study (pre-implementation survey), and 52 probation officers participated in the second wave (post-implementation survey), yielding an overall sample size of 108 probation officers. Dataset 1 contains the data for both waves of the study. The dataset is comprised of 140 variables. Both waves of the study examined the following categories of variables: the probation officer's professional background, contact with clients, amount of time spent on job duties specific to the profession, contact with other agencies, and computer usage. The second wave added 86 variables to explore officers' experiences with CSMS, which features they used, how it impacted their work, and their expected use of CSMS in the future.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32004.v1
computer aided mappingicpsrcase managementicpsrcomputer softwareicpsrcorrectional systemicpsrcriminal justice programsicpsrgeographic information systemsicpsrmappingicpsrparole servicesicpsrparoleesicpsrprisoner reentryicpsrprobation servicesicpsrprobationersicpsrrecordsicpsrrecords managementicpsrsex offendersicpsrspatial dataicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsLucht, JimLa Vigne, Nancy G.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32004Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32004.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29461MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29461MiAaIMiAaI
Long-Term Effects of Law Enforcement's Post-9/11 Focus on Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, 2007-2010, United States
[electronic resource]
Lois M. Davis
,
Jeremy Wilson
2014-09-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR29461NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study examines the state of counterterrorism and homeland security in five large urban law enforcement agencies (the Boston Police Department, the Houston Police Department, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, and the Miami-Dade Police Department) nine years following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It explores the long-term adjustments that these agencies made to accommodate this new role.
Researchers from the RAND Corporation, in consultation with National Institute of Justice project staff, selected law enforcement agencies of major urban areas with a high risk of terrorist attacks from different regions of the United States that have varied experiences with counterterrorism and homeland security issues. The research team conducted on-site, in-depth interviews with personnel involved in developing or implementing counterterrorism or homeland security functions within their respective agency. The research team used a standardized interview protocol to address such issues as security operations, regional role, organizational structures, challenges associated with the focus on counterterrorism and homeland security issues, information sharing, training, equipment, and grant funding.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29461.v1
counterterrorismicpsrfundingicpsrlaw enforcement agenciesicpsrnational securityicpsrpolice departmentsicpsrpolice trainingicpsrtrendsicpsremergency preparednessicpsrNACJD I. Attitude SurveysICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IX. PoliceDavis, Lois M.Wilson, JeremyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29461Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29461.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35338MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35338MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2010
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-09-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35338NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2010. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2010, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2009, through September 30, 2010.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35338.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35338Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35338.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35337MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35337MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2010
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-09-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35337NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35337.v1
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35337Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35337.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28603MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28603MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2009
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-09-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR28603NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2009. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2009, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2009.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28603.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28603Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28603.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28601MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28601MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2009
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-09-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR28601NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28601.v1
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28601Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28601.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28741MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28741MiAaIMiAaI
Tool Mark Analysis of Cut Costal Cartilage, 2009-2010 [United States]
[electronic resource]
Jennifer Love
,
Sharon Derrick
,
Jason Wiersema
,
Charles Peters
2014-09-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR28741NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study was designed to establish the potential error rate associated with the generally accepted method of tool mark analysis of cut marks in costal cartilage. Three knives with different blade types were used to make experimental cut marks in costal cartilage of pigs. Each cut surface was cast, and each cast was examined by three analysts working independently. Presence of striations, regularity of striations, and presence of a primary and secondary striation pattern were recorded for each cast. The distance between each striation was measured. The Cut Mark Measurement Data (Dataset 1) are comprised of the observations and measurements of three analysts on 180 distinct specimen identifiers. The repeated measurements were aggregated by taking the Mean Interstriation Distance (MID) and the medians of the numeric variables for each combination of the categorical variables, resulting in the Aggregated Cut Mark Measurement Data (Dataset 2).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28741.v1
anthropologyicpsrforensic sciencesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XV. ForensicsLove, JenniferDerrick, SharonWiersema, JasonPeters, CharlesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28741Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28741.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35256MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35256MiAaIMiAaI
Annual Probation Survey, 2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-09-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35256NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The 2012 Annual Probation Survey provides a count of the total number of persons supervised on probation on January 1 and December 31, 2012, and a count of the number of persons entering and exiting probation supervision during 2012. The survey also provides counts of the number of probationers by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, offense, and supervision status. The survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35256.v1
criminal justice systemicpsroffensesicpsrprobationicpsrprobationersicpsrsentencingicpsrNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35256Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35256.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR32722MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2011 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR32722MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2011ICPSR32722NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2010 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32722.v5
drug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR III. Health and MortalityRCMD I. CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)32722Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32722.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29621MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29621MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2009
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29621NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2009 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, Adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. In the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29621.v5
incomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrbarbituratesicpsrpregnancyicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrRCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeSAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)NACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramDSDR III. Health and MortalityICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29621Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29621.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26701MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26701MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2008
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-09-05Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR26701NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. Detailed NSDUH 2008 documentation is available from SAMHSA. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2008 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For this 2008 survey, Adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. A split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26701.v5
addictionicpsralcoholicpsralcohol abuseicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsrprescription drugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsryouthsicpsrDSDR III. Health and MortalitySAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26701Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26701.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR31782MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR31782MiAaIMiAaI
A Model of Static and Dynamic Sex Offender Risk Assessment in Vermont, 2001-2010
[electronic resource]
Robert J. McGrath
,
Michael P. Lasher
,
Georgia F. Cumming
2014-09-04Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR31782NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Since 2001, Vermont Department of Corrections (DOC) sex offender treatment providers and probation and parole officers have scored every adult male sex offender under community supervision on three measures of static (unchangeable) risk at intake (i.e., Static-99, RRASOR-Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offence Recidivism, and VASOR-Vermont Assessment of Sex Offender Risk) and one measure of dynamic (changeable) risk (i.e, SOTNPS) at intake and then every six months thereafter. This project conducted record reviews to verify the accuracy of the risk assessment scores and examined how scores on the Sex Offender Treatment Needs and Progress Scale (SOTNPS) and one or more of these static risk instruments can be combined into an overall model of risk assessment. An empirically derived decision-making model was created to assist correctional administrators, probation and parole officers, and treatment providers in allocating and delivering supervision and treatment services based on an individual's treatment needs and risk to sexually
re-offend.
Three hypotheses were tested. First, it was expected that one or more static risk measures (Static-99R, Static-2002R and VASOR) would predict sexual recidivism with moderate accuracy in the sample. Second, a dynamic risk measure, Sex Offender Treatment Needs and Progress Scale (SOTNPS), or a subset of risk factors contained in this measure would also predict sexual recidivism with moderate accuracy and be sensitive to the changes in dynamic risk over time. Third, a combined static and dynamic risk measure would predict sexual recidivism more accurate than either measure alone.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31782.v1
criminalityicpsrinterventionicpsrrecidivism predictionicpsrrehabilitationicpsrrisk assessmenticpsrsex offendersicpsrtreatmenticpsrviolenceicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMcGrath, Robert J.Lasher, Michael P.Cumming, Georgia F.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)31782Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31782.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35203MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35203MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence I - 2008
[electronic resource]
David Finkelhor
,
Heather Turner
2014-08-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35203NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey of Children's Exposure to Violence I was designed to obtain lifetime and one-year incidence estimates of a comprehensive range of childhood victimizations across gender, race, and developmental stage. Conducted between January and July, 2008, it assessed the experiences of a nationally representative sample of 4,549 children aged 1 month to 17 years living in the contiguous United States (excluding New Hampshire).
The primary sample of households was selected from a nationwide sampling frame of residential telephone numbers by random digit dialing (RDD). A second sample was drawn by over-sampling United States telephone exchanges that had a population of 70 percent or more of African American, Hispanic, or low-income households.
A short interview was conducted with an adult caregiver (usually a parent) to obtain family demographic information. One child was randomly selected from all eligible children in a household by selecting the child with the most recent birthday.
The survey used an enhanced version of the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ), an inventory of childhood victimization. This version of the JVQ obtains reports on 48 forms of offenses against youth that cover five general areas of concern including: conventional crime, child maltreatment, peer and sibling victimization, sexual assault, and witnessing and indirect victimization. Follow-up questions for each victimization item gathered additional information about the victimization incident.
The data set has 1,824 variables and 4,549 cases.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35203.v1
alcohol consumptionicpsrchild abuseicpsrchildrenicpsrdelinquent behavioricpsrjuvenile victimsicpsrmental healthicpsrself concepticpsrsexual assaulticpsrvictimizationicpsryouthsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyFinkelhor, DavidTurner, HeatherInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35203Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35203.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02756MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02756MiAaIMiAaI
Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), 1994
[electronic resource][United States]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-08-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2756NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) survey is designed to
capture data on emergency department (ED) episodes that are induced by
or related to the use of an illicit, prescription, or over-the-counter
drug. For purposes of this collection, a drug "episode" is an ED visit
that was induced by or related to the use of an illegal drug or the
nonmedical use of a legal drug for patients aged six years and
older. A drug "mention" refers to a substance that was mentioned
during a drug-related ED episode. Because up to four drugs can be
reported for each drug abuse episode, there are more mentions than
episodes in the data. Individual persons may also be included more
than once in the data. Within each facility participating in DAWN, a
designated reporter, usually a member of the emergency department or
medical records staff, was responsible for identifying drug-related
episodes and recording and submitting data on each case. An episode
report was submitted for each patient visiting a DAWN emergency
department whose presenting problem(s) was/were related to their own
drug use. DAWN produces estimates of drug-related emergency department
visits for 50 specific drugs, drug categories, or combinations of
drugs, including the following: acetaminophen, alcohol in combination
with other drugs, alprazolam, amitriptyline, amphetamines, aspirin,
cocaine, codeine, diazepam, diphenhydramine, fluoxetine,
heroin/morphine, inhalants/solvents/aerosols, LSD, lorazepam,
marijuana/hashish, methadone, methamphetamine, and PCP/PCP in
combination with other drugs. The use of alcohol alone is not
reported. The route of administration and form of drug used (e.g.,
powder, tablet, liquid) are included for each drug. Data collected for
DAWN also include drug use motive and total drug mentions in the
episode, as well as race, age, patient disposition, reason for ED
visit, and day of the week, quarter, and year of episode.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02756.v2
demographic characteristicsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug overdoseicpsrdrug useicpsremergenciesicpsremergency servicesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhospitalizationicpsrNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeSAMHDA VIII. Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN)ICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2756Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02756.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02834MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1999 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02834MiAaIMiAaI
Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), 1997
[electronic resource][United States]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies
2014-08-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1999ICPSR2834NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) survey is designed to
capture data on emergency department (ED) episodes that are induced by
or related to the use of an illicit, prescription, or over-the-counter
drug. For purposes of this collection, a drug "episode" is an ED visit
that was induced by or related to the use of an illegal drug or the
nonmedical use of a legal drug for patients aged six years and
older. A drug "mention" refers to a substance that was mentioned
during a drug-related ED episode. Because up to four drugs can be
reported for each drug abuse episode, there are more mentions than
episodes in the data. Individual persons may also be included more
than once in the data. Within each facility participating in DAWN, a
designated reporter, usually a member of the emergency department or
medical records staff, was responsible for identifying drug-related
episodes and recording and submitting data on each case. An episode
report was submitted for each patient visiting a DAWN emergency
department whose presenting problem(s) was/were related to their own
drug use. DAWN produces estimates of drug-related emergency department
visits for 50 specific drugs, drug categories, or combinations of
drugs, including the following: acetaminophen, alcohol in combination
with other drugs, alprazolam, amitriptyline, amphetamines, aspirin,
cocaine, codeine, diazepam, diphenhydramine, fluoxetine,
heroin/morphine, inhalants/solvents/aerosols, LSD, lorazepam,
marijuana/hashish, methadone, methamphetamine, and PCP/PCP in
combination with other drugs. The use of alcohol alone is not
reported. The route of administration and form of drug used (e.g.,
powder, tablet, liquid) are included for each drug. Data collected for
DAWN also include drug use motive and total drug mentions in the
episode, as well as race, age, patient disposition, reason for ED
visit, and day of the week, quarter, and year of episode.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02834.v2
emergency servicesicpsrhealth behavioricpsrhospitalizationicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug overdoseicpsrdrug useicpsremergenciesicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemSAMHDA VIII. Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN)NAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVI.A. Social Indicators, United StatesUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied StudiesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2834Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02834.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35080MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35080MiAaIMiAaI
The Survey of Criminal Justice Experience (SCJE), 2013
[electronic resource]
Susan Brown
,
Wendy Manning
2014-08-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35080NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to ICPSR member institutions.Also available as downloadable files.
The Survey of Criminal Justice Experience (SCJE) is a household survey of the criminal justice experiences of United States adults ages 18-64. Measures capture supervision (e.g. probation, jail, and prison) and broader experiences such as arrests and convictions. Researchers are able to estimate 12-month and life-time prevalence rates of respondents' criminal justice experiences. Data were collected between May 8, 2013 and May 20, 2013 via a web-based survey conducted by GfK, a leading market research organization. GfK maintains the KnowledgePanel -- a probability-based research panel representative of households in the United States. A random sample of 5,278 individuals aged 18-64 were selected from the KnowledgePanel and 3,260 participated in the survey. Along with the main survey variables, standard demographic variables, a series of data processing variables created by GfK, and a final sample weight are also included in the dataset. Demographic variables cover: age, race, sex, income, regions, education, marital status, employment status, and housing type.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35080.v1
arrest recordsicpsrconviction recordsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcorrectional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional systemicpsrcrimeicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrcriminal justice systemicpsrparoleicpsrprobationicpsrrecidivismicpsrsentencingicpsrsupervised libertyicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNACJD I. Attitude SurveysICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemBrown, SusanManning, WendyInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35080Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35080.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29682MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29682MiAaIMiAaI
Lifecourse Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence and Help-Seeking among Filipina, Indian, and Pakistani Women
[electronic resource]Implications for Justice System Responses 2007-2009 (San Francisco, California)
Mieko Yoshihama
,
Deborah Bybee
,
Chic Dabby
,
Juliane Blazevski
2014-07-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR29682NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The goal of this research project was to enhance the understanding of Asian battered women's experiences in seeking help from the criminal justice system (CJS) and other (non-CJS) programs and develop recommendations for system responses to intimate partner violence (IPV) in Asian communities. The project focused on selected Asian ethnic groups -- Filipina, Indian and Pakistani and addressed the following research questions:
When do Asian battered women experience various types of IPV over their life course?
When do Asian battered women come into contact with CJS and non-CJS agencies?
What kinds of responses do Asian battered women receive from CJS and non-CJS agencies?
What responses do Asian battered women perceive as helpful?
What are the barriers to contacting CJS agencies?
What suggestions do Asian battered women have for improving CJS responses to IPV in Asian communities?
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29682.v1
criminal justice systemicpsrintimate partner violenceicpsrminoritiesicpsrrace relationsicpsrviolence against womenicpsrabuseicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenYoshihama, MiekoBybee, DeborahDabby, ChicBlazevski, JulianeInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29682Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29682.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34605MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34605MiAaIMiAaI
Research on Pathways to Desistance [Maricopa County, AZ and Philadelphia County, PA]
[electronic resource]Official Arrest Records, 2000-2010 [Restricted]
Edward P. Mulvey
2014-07-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34605NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Pathways to Desistance study was a multi-site study that followed 1,354 serious juvenile offenders from adolescence to young adulthood in two locales between the years 2000 and 2010. Enrolled into the study were adjudicated youths from the juvenile and adult court systems in Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona (N=654), and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania (N=700).
The official arrests records of all 1,354 youth were obtained from multiple sources. For arrest/petitions under the age of 18, this information is based on petitions appearing in the juvenile and adult court records in each site. In Philadelphia, this information was gathered based on a hand review of juvenile and adult court documents; in Phoenix, the information is based on reports from two computerized court tracking systems (JOLTS--Juvenile On-Line Tracking System for juvenile court information, ICIS--Maricopa County Superior Court database for adult court information). For arrests/petitions over 18, FBI arrest records are the source of information. There is no self-reported information contained in this set of data.
Information from these different data sources is consolidated into the following categories:
Information regarding petitions with a date that falls prior to the baseline interview date ("prior petitions").
Information regarding the study index petition (also called the "initial referring petition"; this is the adjudication that prompted study enrollment). Information regarding the study index petition can be found by accessing the "type" variable associated with the prior petitions (specific variable name: Official Record Prior PetitionXX: Petition type). Depending on the investigator's needs, this petition can remain combined with the "priors" or be used as a stand-alone petition.
Information regarding arrests and court petitions with a date which falls after the baseline interview date in the Pathways study ("rearrests").
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v2
arrest recordsicpsrfelony offensesicpsrjuvenile crimeicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrmisdemeanor offensesicpsrproperty crimesicpsrsex offensesicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrweapons offensesicpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyHMCA III. Substance Abuse and HealthNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemMulvey, Edward P.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34605Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34605.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35245MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35245MiAaIMiAaI
Firearm Injury Surveillance Study, 1993-2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
2014-07-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35245NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data were collected using the National Electronic
Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), the primary data system of the
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). CPSC began
operating NEISS in 1972 to monitor product-related injuries treated in
United States hospital emergency departments (EDs). In June 1992, the
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), within the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, established an interagency
agreement with CPSC to begin collecting data on nonfatal
firearm-related injuries in order to monitor the incidents and the
characteristics of persons with nonfatal firearm-related injuries
treated in United States hospital EDs over time. This dataset
represents all nonfatal firearm-related injuries (i.e., injuries
associated with powder-charged guns) and all nonfatal BB and pellet
gun-related injuries reported through NEISS from 1993 through
2010. The cases consist of initial ED visits for treatment of the
injuries. Cases were reported even if the patients subsequently died.
Secondary visits and transfers from other hospitals were excluded.
Information is available on injury diagnosis, firearm type, use of
drugs or alcohol, criminal incident, and locale of the
incident. Demographic information includes age, sex, and race of the
injured person.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35245.v1
firearmsicpsrhandgunsicpsrmedical careicpsrnonfatal injuriesicpsrproduct safetyicpsrpublic healthicpsrpublic safetyicpsraccidentsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsDSDR III. Health and MortalityUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and ControlInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35245Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35245.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35233MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35233MiAaIMiAaI
National Electronic Injury Surveillance System All Injury Program, 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
,
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
2014-07-09Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35233NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Beginning in July 2000, the National Center for Injury
Prevention and Control (NCIPC), and Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), in collaboration with the United States Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC), expanded the National Electronic
Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) to collect data on all types and
causes of injuries treated in a representative sample of United States
hospitals with emergency departments (ED). This system is called the
NEISS-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP). The NEISS-AIP is designed to
provide national incidence estimates of all types and external causes
of nonfatal injuries and poisonings treated in United States hospital
EDs. Data on injury-related visits are being obtained from a national
sample of 66 out of 100 NEISS hospitals that were selected as a
stratified probability sample of hospitals in the United States and
its territories with a minimum of 6 beds and a 24-hour ED. The
sample includes separate strata for very large, large, medium, and
small hospitals, defined by the number of annual ED visits per
hospital, and children's hospitals. The scope of reporting goes beyond
routine reporting of injuries associated with consumer-related
products in CPSC's jurisdiction to include all injuries and
poisonings. The data can be used to (1) measure the magnitude and
distribution of nonfatal injuries in the United States, (2) monitor
unintentional and violence-related nonfatal injuries over time, (3)
identify emerging injury problems, (4) identify specific cases for
follow-up investigations of particular injury-related problems, and
(5) set national priorities. A fundamental principle of this expansion
effort is that preliminary surveillance data will be made available in
a timely manner to a number of different federal agencies with unique
and overlapping public health responsibilities and concerns. Also,
annually, the final edited data are released as public use data files
for use by other public health professionals and researchers. These
public use data files provide NEISS-AIP data on nonfatal injuries
collected from July through December each year. Variables in the datasets include body part affected by injury, diagnosis, case disposition, fire
involvement, immediate cause of injury, injury as determined by the
CDC, intent of injury, intent with sexual/other assault, locales where
injured, precipitating cause of injury, perpetrator to victim
relationship in assault, reason for assault, whether injury was
sports-related or traffic-related, whether it was a violent injury,
and date of injury. Demographic information specifies race, sex, and
age of patient.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35233.v1
accidentsicpsrmedical careicpsrnonfatal injuriesicpsrpoisoningicpsrproduct safetyicpsrpublic healthicpsrpublic safetyicpsrNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDSDR III. Health and MortalityAHRQMCC I. Multiple Chronic ConditionsUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and ControlUnited States Consumer Product Safety CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35233Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35233.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35036MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35036MiAaIMiAaI
National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2012
[electronic resource]Extract Files
National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
2014-07-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35036NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a
part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The extract files version of
NIBRS was created to simplify working with NIBRS data. Data management
issues with NIBRS are significant, especially when two or more segment
levels are being merged. These issues require skills separate from
data analysis. NIBRS data as formatted by the FBI are stored in a
single file. These data are organized by various segment levels
(record types). There are six main segment levels: administrative,
offense, property, victim, offender, and arrestee. Each segment level
has a different length and layout. There are other segment levels that
occur with less frequency than the six main levels. Significant
computing resources are necessary to work with the data in its
single-file format. In addition, the user must be sophisticated in
working with data in complex file types. For these reasons and the
desire to facilitate the use of NIBRS data, ICPSR created the extract
files. The data are not a representative sample of crime in the United
States.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35036.v1
national crime statistics (USA)icpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrarrestsicpsrcrimeicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrlaw enforcement agenciesicpsrproperty crimeicpsrUniform Crime Reportsicpsrvictimsicpsrviolent crimeicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsNational Archive of Criminal Justice DataInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35036Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35036.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR26041MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR26041MiAaIMiAaI
Effects of Intimate Partner Violence on the Workplace in the United States, 2005-2008
[electronic resource]
Carol Reeves
,
Anne O'Leary-Kelly
2014-06-30Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR26041NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This research, which was conducted in two phases, explored the effects of intimate partner violence (IPV) on the workplace between 2005 and 2008. Phase One (Dataset 1, Phase One Data) examined the prevalence of IPV among employed individuals, how IPV affects the personal and professional well-being of employees, and its costs for employers. Researchers focused on two research questions:
Does IPV affect employees, and, if so, how?
What is the impact of IPV on organizations?
Phase Two (Dataset 2, Phase Two Data) focused more specifically on the interactions between employed IPV victims and their coworkers, focusing on the following questions:
Does work-related social support have positive effects on the well-being, attitudes, and behaviors of employed IPV victims?
How and when will coworkers provide assistance to IPV victims at work?
When and to whom will IPB victims disclose their victimization at work?
What organizational conditions are associated with stronger feelings of hopefulness on the part of employed IPB victims?
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26041.v1
domestic violenceicpsreconomic behavioricpsrintimate partner violenceicpsrwork environmenticpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD I. Attitude SurveysNACJD X. VictimizationReeves, CarolO'Leary-Kelly, AnneInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)26041Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26041.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04632MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04632MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2003
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4632NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04632.v2
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4632Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04632.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04629MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04629MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2004
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4629NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04629.v2
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4629Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04629.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04627MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04627MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2005
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4627NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04627.v2
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4627Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04627.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03494MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03494MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource] Appeals Data, 2001
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3494NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. The United States
Sentencing Commission compiled from the Clerk of the Court of each
court of appeals the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03494.v1
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3494Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03494.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03105MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03105MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource] Appeals Data, 1999
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3105NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. The United States
Sentencing Commission compiled from the Clerk of the Court of each
court of appeals the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions (although
technically civil matters), because such cases often involve
sentencing issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in
this collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises
individual records representing all codefendants participating in a
consolidated appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the
sentencing-related issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
The 1999 data includes all appeals cases received as of December 27,
1999, that had disposition dates between October 1, 1998, and
September 30, 1999 (inclusive).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03105.v1
court casesicpsrdefendantsicpsrappeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3105Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03105.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03493MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03493MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource] Appeals Data, 2000
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3493NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. The United States
Sentencing Commission compiled from the Clerk of the Court of each
court of appeals the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03493.v1
appeal proceduresicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrappellate courtsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3493Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03493.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20102MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20102MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2006
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20102NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2006. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2006, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2005, through September 30, 2006. In 1999, the United
States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases
to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several
variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event.
Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the first
occurrence of each iterating variable. Over 99 percent of the valid
data is captured in this variable for most sets of iterations. Part
2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20102.v2
disposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20102Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20102.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04631MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04631MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2003
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4631NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2003. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2003, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2002, through September 30, 2003.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04631.v2
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4631Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04631.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04609MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04609MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2005
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4609NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2005. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2005, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04609.v2
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4609Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04609.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04109MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04109MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2002
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4109NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2002. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational Defendants Data, 2002, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2001, through September 30, 2002.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04109.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4109Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04109.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03498MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03498MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2001
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3498NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2001. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status of the defendant
organization, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of
criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational
Defendants Data, 2001, covers fiscal year October 1, 2000, through
September 30, 2001.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03498.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3498Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03498.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03495MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03495MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2000
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3495NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2000. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status of the defendant
organization, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of
criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational
Defendants Data, 2000, covers fiscal year October 1, 1999, through
September 30, 2000.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03495.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3495Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03495.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR06559MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1996 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR06559MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource] Appeals Data, 1993-1998
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1996ICPSR6559NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. The United States
Sentencing Commission compiled from the Clerk of the Court of each
court of appeals the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions (although
technically civil matters), because such cases often involve
sentencing issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in
this collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises
individual records representing all codefendants participating in a
consolidated appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the
sentencing-related issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
The 1993 data file (Part 1) includes all appeals cases received by the
United States Sentencing Commission as of December 22, 1993, that had
disposition dates between March 9, 1990, and September 30, 1993
(inclusive). The 1994 file (Part 2) includes all appeals cases
received as of December 23, 1994, that had disposition dates between
October 1, 1993, and September 30, 1994 (inclusive). The 1995 data
file (Part 6) includes all appeals cases received as of December 26,
1995, that had disposition dates between October 1, 1994, and
September 30, 1995 (inclusive). The 1996 data file (Part 7) includes
all appeals cases received as of December 27, 1996, that had
disposition dates between October 1, 1995, and September 30, 1996
(inclusive). The 1997 data file (Part 8) includes all appeals cases
received as of December 27, 1997, that had disposition dates between
October 1, 1996, and September 30, 1997 (inclusive). The 1998 data
file (Part 9) includes all appeals cases received as of December 27,
1997, that had disposition dates between October 1, 1997, and
September 30, 1998 (inclusive).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06559.v4
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrcourt casesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)6559Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06559.v4 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04108MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04108MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource] Appeals Data, 2002
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4108NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04108.v1
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4108Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04108.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04628MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04628MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2004
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4628NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2004. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2004, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2003, through September 30, 2004.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04628.v2
corporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4628Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04628.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09513MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1991 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09513MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 1987-1998
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1991ICPSR9513NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
complete guideline application information was not
received. The database does not include organizational defendants
sentenced pursuant to pre-guideline procedures.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09513.v3
organizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9513Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09513.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25425MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25425MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2008
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR25425NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25425.v2
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25425Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25425.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22624MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22624MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2007
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR22624NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22624.v2
legal appealsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrappeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22624Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22624.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25426MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25426MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2008
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25426NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2008. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2008, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2007, through September 30, 2008.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25426.v2
convictions (law)icpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25426Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25426.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03104MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03104MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 1999
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3104NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 1999. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status of the defendant
organization, whether it was a criminal organization, duration of
criminal activity, and risk to national security. Organizational
Defendants Data, 1999, covers fiscal year October 1, 1998, through
September 30, 1999.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03104.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcorporate crimeicpsrcorporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3104Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03104.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20101MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20101MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences
[electronic resource]Appeals Data, 2006
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20101NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each case comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20101.v2
appeal proceduresicpsrappellate courtsicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrhabeas corpusicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal appealsicpsroffensesicpsrsentence reviewicpsrsentencingicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20101Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20101.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22625MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2008 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22625MiAaIMiAaI
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2007
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2008ICPSR22625NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2007. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2007, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2006, through September 30, 2007.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22625.v3
corporate sentencingicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfinesicpsrorganizational structureicpsrconvictions (law)icpsrorganizationsicpsrrestitution programsicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrcorporate crimeicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22625Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22625.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR09317MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1990 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR09317MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 1987-1998
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1990ICPSR9317NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between November 1, 1987, and September 30, 1998, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. The cases are categorized either as
New Law, with all offenses occurring after the November 1, 1987,
guidelines, or as Mixed Law, with at least one count occurring after
the guideline effectiveness date and other counts prior to the
guidelines. The Cross-Reference Data files
contain data for guidelines that
are cross-referenced or that are considered to be underlying
guidelines.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09317.v5
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)9317Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09317.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04633MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04633MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2004
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4633NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2004, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, Main
Data, includes the most important variables for each case, such as
defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal status, case
disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, Supplemental Data,
contains additional variables involving multiple guideline computation
and count-based statutes. For a more detailed discussion of the two
files, users should consult the codebook.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04633.v2
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4633Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04633.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04630MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04630MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2005
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR4630NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 2004, and September 30, 2005, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, Main
Data, includes the most important variables for each case, such as
defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal status, case
disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, Supplemental Data,
contains additional variables involving multiple guideline computation
and count-based statutes. For a more detailed discussion of the two
files, users should consult the codebook.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04630.v2
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4630Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04630.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04290MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2005 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04290MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2003
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2005ICPSR4290NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2003, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, Main
Data File, includes the most important variables for each case, such
as defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal status,
case disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, Supplemental
Data File, contains additional variables involving multiple guideline
computation and count-based statutes. For a more detailed discussion
of the two files, users should consult the codebook.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04290.v3
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsRCMD I. CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4290Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04290.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR04110MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2004 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR04110MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2002
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2004ICPSR4110NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 2001, and September 30, 2002, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, Main
Data File, includes the most important variables for each case, such
as defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal status,
case disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, Supplemental
Data File, contains additional variables involving multiple guideline
computation and count-based statutes. For a more detailed discussion
of the two files, users should consult the codebook.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04110.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeNACJD V. CourtsUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)4110Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04110.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03497MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03497MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2001
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3497NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 2000, and September 30, 2001, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, Main
Data File, includes the most important variables for each case, such
as defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal status,
case disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, Supplemental
Data File, contains additional variables involving multiple guideline
computation and count-based statutes. For a more detailed discussion
of the two files, users should consult the codebook.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03497.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3497Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03497.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03496MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2002 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03496MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2000
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2002ICPSR3496NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2000, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, Main
Data File, includes the most important variables for each case, such
as defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal status,
case disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, Supplemental
Data File, contains additional variables involving multiple guideline
computation and count-based statutes. For a more detailed discussion
of the two files, users should consult the codebook.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03496.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrsentencing reformsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3496Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03496.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR03106MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2001 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR03106MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 1999
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2001ICPSR3106NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 1998, and September 30, 1999, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, the
main data file, includes the most important variables for each case,
such as defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal
status, case disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, the
supplemental file, contains additional variables involving multiple
guideline computation and count-based statutes. For a more detailed
discussion of the two files, users should consult the codebook.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03106.v1
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)3106Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03106.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25424MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25424MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2008
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR25424NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2007, and September 30, 2008, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the highest occurrences of each iterating variable. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25424.v2
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25424Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25424.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR22623MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2009 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR22623MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2007
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2009ICPSR22623NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had sentencing dates between October 1, 2006, and September 30, 2007, and were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event. Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the first three occurrences of each iterating variable. Over 99 percent of the valid data is captured in these three variables for most sets of iterations. Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22623.v2
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)22623Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR22623.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR20120MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2007 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR20120MiAaIMiAaI
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, 2006
[electronic resource]
United States Sentencing Commission
2014-06-25Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2007ICPSR20120NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 2005, and September 30, 2006, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Several
variables iterate to include multiple occurrences of the same event.
Part 1, Main Data, includes all noniterating variables plus the first
two occurrences of each iterating variable. Over 99 percent of the valid
data is captured in these two variables for most sets of iterations.
Part 2, Supplementary Data, includes the remaining iterations.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20120.v2
convictions (law)icpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsroffensesicpsrsentencingicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrNACJD V. CourtsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemRCMD I. CrimeUnited States Sentencing CommissionInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)20120Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20120.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR02038MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s1998 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR02038MiAaIMiAaI
State Court Processing Statistics, 1990-2009
[electronic resource]Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-24Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]1998ICPSR2038NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Originally known as the National Pretrial Reporting
Program, the State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) program tracks
felony cases filed in May of a given year until final disposition or
until one year has elapsed from the date of filing. This collection
presents data on felony cases filed in approximately 40 of the
nation's 75 most populous counties in even numbered years from
1990-2006 and 2009. These 75 counties account for more than a third of the
United States population and approximately half of all reported
crimes. The cases from these 40 jurisdictions are weighted to
represent all felony filings during the month of May in the 75 most
populous counties. Data were collected on arrest charges, demographic
characteristics, criminal history, pretrial release and detention,
adjudication, and sentencing.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02038.v5
case processingicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal historiesicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfelonsicpsrfelony courtsicpsrpretrial detentionicpsrpretrial releaseicpsrsentencingicpsrstate courtsicpsrstatistical dataicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)2038Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02038.v5 nmm 22 4500ICPSR25901MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR25901MiAaIMiAaI
Age and Sex Estimation from the Human Clavicle in the American Population, 1912-1938 and 1986-1998
[electronic resource]
Natalie Langley-Shirley
,
Richard L. Jantz
,
Mohamed Mahfouz
2014-06-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR25901NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study investigated skeletal maturation and gender dimorphism in the human clavicle in the American population. Biological data were collected on two skeletal collections: the William F. McCormick Clavicle Collection and the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection. Size and shape data were collected from computed tomography (CT) scans of the McCormick clavicles. Several automated measurements were taken on 1,413 McCormick clavicles, including three traditional and six non-traditional measurements (Dataset 1). A total of 593 individuals from the William F. McCormick Clavicle Collection (Dataset 2) and 354 individuals from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection (Dataset 3) were scored for medial clavicular epiphyseal fusion using McKern and Stewart's (1957) five-phase rating system.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25901.v1
demographic characteristicsicpsrforensic sciencesicpsrgendericpsrphysical characteristicsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XV. ForensicsLangley-Shirley, NatalieJantz, Richard L.Mahfouz, MohamedInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)25901Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25901.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33141MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33141MiAaIMiAaI
Developing a Common Metric for Evaluating Police Performance in Deadly Force Situations in the United States, 2009-2011
[electronic resource]
Bryan Vila
2014-06-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR33141NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study developed interval-level measurement scales for evaluating police officer performance during real or simulated deadly force situations. Through a two-day concept mapping focus group, statements were identified to describe two sets of dynamics: the difficulty (D) of a deadly force situation and the performance (P) of a police officer in that situation. These statements were then operationalized into measurable Likert-scale items that were scored by 291 use of force instructors from more than 100 agencies across the United States using an online survey instrument. The dataset resulting from this process contains a total of 685 variables, comprised of 312 difficulty statement items, 278 performance statement items, and 94 variables that measure the demographic characteristics of the scorers.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33141.v1
evaluationicpsrhandgunsicpsrpoliceicpsrpolice effectivenessicpsrpolice performanceicpsrpolice safetyicpsrpolice trainingicpsrpolice use of deadly forceicpsrpolicies and proceduresicpsrNACJD I. Attitude SurveysNACJD IX. PoliceICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemVila, BryanInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33141Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33141.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35049MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35049MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35049NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters received by United States attorneys or filed before the United States magistrates during fiscal year 2011. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Table 1.1. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35049.v1
federal courtsicpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35049Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35049.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35042MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35042MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35042NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2011 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35042.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrtrial courtsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35042Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35042.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35056MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35056MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants Charged in Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35056NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2011. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35056.v1
defendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35056Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35056.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35055MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35055MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Suspects in Federal Criminal Matters Concluded, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35055NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of suspects in federal criminal matters concluded by United States attorneys or United States magistrates during fiscal year 2011. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. Records include suspects in criminal matters, and are limited to suspects whose matters were not declined immediately by the United States attorneys. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.2-1.5. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35055.v1
defendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrfederal offensesicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35055Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35055.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35054MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35054MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35054NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were terminated by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2011. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35054.v1
defendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35054Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35054.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35053MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35053MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Statutes for Counts of Convictions for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35053NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data contain records of statutes for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2011. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of counts of conviction for that defendant, and that total is recorded in the NOCOUNT variable. As an example, if a defendant has five counts of conviction (NOCOUNT=5), he or she will have five records in the current data. As it is possible for defendants to have multiple statutes applying to a single count of conviction, up to three statutes (STA1-STA3) are recorded for each count of conviction. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35053.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrtrial courtsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35053Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35053.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35052MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35052MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Guideline Computations for Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35052NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data contain records of guideline computations and adjustments for each count of conviction for criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2011. The data are one of two supplementary files that should be used in conjunction with the primary analysis file, which contains records for all defendants sentenced under the guidelines. These data can be linked to the primary analysis file using the unique identifier variable USSCIDN. The number of records for a defendant in the current data corresponds to the total number of guideline computations, which may or may not equal the total counts of conviction for that defendant, dependent upon the grouping rules of the particular guideline in question (see Section 3D1.2 of the guidelines manual). As an example, a defendant with five counts of drug trafficking will only have one guideline computation because each of the drug weights for each count are simply added together and only one calculation is necessary. However, if a defendant has five counts of bank robbery, he or she will have five separate guideline computations because bank robbery is considered to be a nongroupable offense. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35052.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrtrial courtsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35052Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35052.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35051MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35051MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants Sentenced Under the Sentencing Reform Act, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35051NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data contain records of criminal defendants who were sentenced pursuant to provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) of 1984 and reported to the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) during fiscal year 2011. It is estimated that over 90 percent of felony defendants in the federal criminal justice system are sentenced pursuant to the SRA of 1984. The data were obtained from the United States Sentencing Commission's Office of Policy Analysis' (OPA) Standardized Research Data File. The Standardized Research Data File consists of variables from the Monitoring Department's database, which is limited to those defendants whose records have been furnished to the USSC by United States district courts and United States magistrates, as well as variables created by the OPA specifically for research purposes. The data include variables from the Judgement and Conviction (J and C) order submitted by the court, background and guideline information collected from the Presentencing Report (PSR), and the report on sentencing hearing in the Statement of Reasons (SOR). These data contain detailed information such as the guideline base offense level, offense level adjustments, criminal history, departure status, statement of reasons given for departure, and basic demographic information. These data are the primary analysis file and include only statute, guideline computation, and adjustment variables for the most serious offense of conviction. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35051.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrsentencing guidelinesicpsrtrial courtsicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35051Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35051.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35050MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35050MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Arrests and Bookings for Federal Offenses, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35050NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of arrests and bookings for federal offenses in the United States during fiscal year 2011. The data were constructed from the United States Marshals Service (USMS) Prisoner Tracking System database. Records include arrests made by federal law enforcement agencies (including the USMS), state and local agencies, and self-surrenders. Offenders arrested for federal offenses are transferred to the custody of the USMS for processing, transportation, and detention. The Prisoner Tracking System contains data on all offenders within the custody of the USMS. The data file contains variables from the original USMS files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 1.1-1.3. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35050.v1
arrest recordsicpsrarrestsicpsrfederal offensesicpsrfederal prisonersicpsroffendersicpsrNACJD IX. PoliceICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35050Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35050.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35048MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35048MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases -- Terminated, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35048NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2011. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35048.v1
defendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35048Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35048.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35047MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35047MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Charges Filed Against Defendants in Criminal Cases in District Court, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35047NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of charges filed against defendants whose cases were filed by United States attorneys in United States district court during fiscal year 2011. The data are charge-level records, and more than one charge may be filed against a single defendant. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central Charge file. The charge-level data may be linked to defendant-level data (extracted from the EOUSA Central System file) through the CS_SEQ variable, and it should be noted that some defendants may not have any charges other than the lead charge appearing on the defendant-level record. The Central Charge and Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35047.v1
defendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsroffensesicpsrprosecutionicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35047Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35047.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35046MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35046MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Offenders in Prison at Year-End, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35046NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of sentenced offenders in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at year-end of fiscal year 2011. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35046.v1
correctional systemicpsroffendersicpsrprisonsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35046Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35046.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35045MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35045MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Offenders Released From Prison, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35045NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of sentenced offenders released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2011. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. Records of offenders who exit federal prison temporarily, such as for transit to another location, to serve a weekend sentence, or for health care, are not included in the exiting cohort. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35045.v1
correctional systemicpsroffendersicpsrprisonsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35045Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35045.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35044MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35044MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Offenders Admitted to Prison, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35044NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of sentenced offenders committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2011. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35044.v1
correctional systemicpsroffendersicpsrprisonsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35044Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35044.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35043MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35043MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Terminated, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35043NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases terminated in United States District Court during fiscal year 2011. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35043.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrtrial courtsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35043Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35043.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35041MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35041MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35041NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2011. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35041.v1
administrationicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrdistrict courtsicpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrtrial courtsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35041Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35041.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR33523MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR33523MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2010
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR33523NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains county-level counts of
arrests and offenses for Part I offenses (murder, rape, robbery,
aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson) and
counts of arrests for Part II offenses (forgery, fraud, embezzlement,
vandalism, weapons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse
violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew violations, and runaways).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33523.v2
aggravated assaulticpsralcoholicpsrarrestsicpsrarsonicpsrassaulticpsrauto thefticpsrembezzlementicpsrburglaryicpsrcountiesicpsrforgeryicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrfraudicpsrillegal gamblingicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmurdericpsroffensesicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrsex offensesicpsrUniform Crime Reportsicpsrvagrancyicpsrvandalismicpsrweapons offensesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)33523Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33523.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30763MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30763MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2009
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-06-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR30763NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains county-level counts of
arrests and offenses for Part I offenses (murder, rape, robbery,
aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson) and
counts of arrests for Part II offenses (forgery, fraud, embezzlement,
vandalism, weapons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse
violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew violations, and runaways).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30763.v2
crime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrembezzlementicpsrforgeryicpsrfraudicpsrillegal gamblingicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmurdericpsroffensesicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrsex offensesicpsrUniform Crime Reportsicpsrvagrancyicpsrvandalismicpsrweapons offensesicpsraggravated assaulticpsralcoholicpsrarrestsicpsrarsonicpsrassaulticpsrauto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcountiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30763Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30763.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34582MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34582MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2011
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-06-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34582NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains county-level counts of
arrests and offenses for Part I offenses (murder, rape, robbery,
aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson) and
counts of arrests for Part II offenses (forgery, fraud, embezzlement,
vandalism, weapons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse
violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew violations, and runaways).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34582.v2
aggravated assaulticpsralcoholicpsrarrestsicpsrarsonicpsrassaulticpsrauto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcountiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrembezzlementicpsrfraudicpsrillegal gamblingicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmurdericpsroffensesicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrsex offensesicpsrUniform Crime Reportsicpsrvagrancyicpsrvandalismicpsrweapons offensesicpsrNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34582Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34582.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35019MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35019MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-06-12Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35019NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This data collection contains county-level counts of
arrests and offenses for Part I offenses (murder, rape, robbery,
aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson) and
counts of arrests for Part II offenses (forgery, fraud, embezzlement,
vandalism, weapons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse
violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew violations, and runaways).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35019.v1
aggravated assaulticpsralcoholicpsrarrestsicpsrarsonicpsrassaulticpsrauto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcountiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrembezzlementicpsrfraudicpsrillegal gamblingicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmurdericpsroffensesicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrsex offensesicpsrUniform Crime Reportsicpsrvandalismicpsrweapons offensesicpsrNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35019Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35019.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35035MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35035MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-06-03Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35035NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a
part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In the late 1970s, the law
enforcement community called for a thorough evaluative study of the
UCR with the objective of recommending an expanded and enhanced UCR
program to meet law enforcement needs into the 21st century. The FBI
fully concurred with the need for an updated program to meet
contemporary needs and provided its support, formulating a
comprehensive redesign effort. Following a multiyear study, a
"Blueprint for the Future of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program" was
developed. Using the "Blueprint," and in consultation with local and
state law enforcement executives, the FBI formulated new guidelines
for the Uniform Crime Reports. The National Incident-Based Reporting
System (NIBRS) was implemented to meet these guidelines. NIBRS data
are archived at ICPSR as 13 separate data files per year, which may be
merged by using linkage variables. The data focus on a variety of
aspects of a crime incident. Part 4, Administrative Segment, offers
data on the incident itself (date and time). Each crime incident is
delineated by one administrative segment record. Also provided are
Part 5, Offense Segment (offense type, location, weapon use, and bias
motivation), Part 6, Property Segment (type of property loss, property
description, property value, drug type and quantity), Part 7, Victim
Segment (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and injuries), Part 8, Offender
Segment (age, sex, and race), and Part 9, Arrestee Segment (arrest
date, age, sex, race, and weapon use). The Batch Header Segment (Parts
1-3) separates and identifies individual police agencies by
Originating Agency Identifier (ORI). Batch Header information, which
is contained on three records for each ORI, includes agency name,
geographic location, and population of the area. Part 10, Group B
Arrest Report Segment, includes arrestee data for Group B crimes.
Window Segments files (Parts 11-13) pertain to incidents for which the
complete Group A Incident Report was not submitted to the FBI. In
general, a Window Segment record will be generated if the incident
occurred prior to January 1 of the previous year or if the incident
occurred prior to when the agency started NIBRS reporting. As with the
UCR, participation in NIBRS is voluntary on the part of law
enforcement agencies. The data are not a representative sample of
crime in the United States.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35035.v1
arrestsicpsrcrimeicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrlaw enforcement agenciesicpsrnational crime statistics (USA)icpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrUniform Crime Reportsicpsrvictimsicpsrviolent crimeicpsrNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35035Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35035.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35016MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35016MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Arson, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-05-29Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35016NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic
nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
the criminal justice system. Seven main classifications of crime were
chosen to gauge fluctuations in the overall volume and rate of
crime. These seven classifications that eventually became known as the
Crime Index included the violent crimes of murder and non-negligent
manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, and the
property crimes of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft.
By congressional mandate, arson was added as the eighth Index offense
in 1979. Arson is defined as any willful or malicious burning or
attempt to burn, with or without intent to defraud, a dwelling house,
public building, motor vehicle or aircraft, personal property of
another, etc. The arson data files include monthly data on the number
of arson offenses reported and the number of offenses cleared by
arrest or other means. The counts include all reports of arson
received from victims, officers who discovered infractions, or other
sources.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35016.v1
arrestsicpsrarsonicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrlaw enforcementicpsroffensesicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35016Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35016.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35022MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35022MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Property Stolen and Recovered, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-05-27Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35022NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: PROPERTY STOLEN AND RECOVERED,
2012 file (also known as the Supplement to Return A) is collected at the agency level and includes detailed monthly data on the nature of crime and the value and type of property stolen and recovered incident to each crime. The Return A Supplement requires that a value be established for property stolen and recovered in each Crime Index category except aggravated assault. It is designed to record the value of property stolen and recovered in the following eleven classifications: Currency/notes, Jewelry and Precious Metals, Clothing and Furs, Locally Stolen Motor Vehicles, Office Equipment, Televisions/Radios, Firearms, Household Goods, Consumable Goods, Livestock, and Miscellaneous. The determination of the value of property stolen is an obligation of the investigating officer, and such information is essential to assure the completeness of a law enforcement investigative report on stolen property. The data were originally assembled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from reports submitted by agencies participating in the UCR. The ICPSR file was processed from Return A Supplement files provided by the FBI.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35022.v1
arrestsicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsroffensesicpsrproperty crime statisticsicpsrproperty crimesicpsrstolen propertyicpsrstolen property recoveryicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35022Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35022.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35021MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35021MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-05-22Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35021NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: OFFENSES KNOWN AND CLEARANCES BY ARREST, 2012 dataset is a compilation of offenses reported to law enforcement agencies in the United States. Due to the vast number of categories of crime committed in the United States, the FBI has limited the type of crimes included in this compilation to those crimes which people are most likely to report to police and those crimes which occur frequently enough to be analyzed across time. Crimes included are criminal homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft.
Much information about these crimes is provided in this dataset. The number of times an offense has been reported, the number of reported offenses that have been cleared by arrests, and the number of cleared offenses which involved offenders under the age of 18 are the major items of information collected.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35021.v1
arrestsicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrlaw enforcementicpsroffensesicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35021Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35021.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34481MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2012 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34481MiAaIMiAaI
National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
2014-05-19Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2012ICPSR34481NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) series (formerly titled National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) primarily measures the prevalence and correlates of drug use in the United States. The surveys are designed to provide quarterly, as well as annual, estimates. Information is provided on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco among members of United States households aged 12 and older. Questions included age at first use as well as lifetime, annual, and past-month usage for the following drug classes: marijuana, cocaine (and crack), hallucinogens, heroin, inhalants, alcohol, tobacco, and nonmedical use of prescription drugs, including pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants, and sedatives. The survey covered substance abuse treatment history and perceived need for treatment, and included questions from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders that allow diagnostic criteria to be applied. The survey included questions concerning treatment for both substance abuse and mental health-related disorders. Respondents were also asked about personal and family income sources and amounts, health care access and coverage, illegal activities and arrest record, problems resulting from the use of drugs, and needle-sharing. Questions introduced in previous administrations were retained in the 2011 survey, including questions asked only of respondents aged 12 to 17. These "youth experiences" items covered a variety of topics, such as neighborhood environment, illegal activities, drug use by friends, social support, extracurricular activities, exposure to substance abuse prevention and education programs, and perceived adult attitudes toward drug use and activities such as school work. Several measures focused on prevention-related themes in this section. Also retained were questions on mental health and access to care, perceived risk of using drugs, perceived availability of drugs, driving and personal behavior, and cigar smoking. Questions on the tobacco brand used most often were introduced with the 1999 survey. For the 2008 survey, adult mental health questions were added to measure symptoms of psychological distress in the worst period of distress that a person experienced in the past 30 days and suicidal ideation. In 2008, a split-sample design also was included to administer separate sets of questions (WHODAS vs. SDS) to assess impairment due to mental health problems. Beginning with the 2009 NSDUH, however, all of the adults in the sample received only the WHODAS questions. Background information includes gender, race, age, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, job status, veteran status, and current household composition.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34481.v3
alcohol abuseicpsraddictionicpsralcoholicpsrprescription drugsicpsrsedativesicpsrsmokingicpsrstimulantsicpsrsubstance abuseicpsrsubstance abuse treatmenticpsrtobacco useicpsrtranquilizersicpsralcohol consumptionicpsramphetaminesicpsrbarbituratesicpsrcocaineicpsrcontrolled drugsicpsrcrack cocaineicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrdepression (psychology)icpsrdrinking behavioricpsrdrug abuseicpsrdrug dependenceicpsrdrug treatmenticpsrdrug useicpsrdrugsicpsremploymenticpsrhallucinogensicpsrhealth careicpsrheroinicpsrhouseholdsicpsrincomeicpsrinhalantsicpsrmarijuanaicpsrmental healthicpsrmental health servicesicpsrmethamphetamineicpsrpregnancyicpsryouthsicpsrNACJD XI. Drugs, Alcohol, and CrimeICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemDSDR XII. Childhood ObesitySAMHDA I. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)RCMD V. Health and Well-BeingRCMD I. CrimeDSDR III. Health and MortalityNAHDAP I. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive ProgramUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and QualityInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34481Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34481.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35086MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35086MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Hate Crime Data, 2012 [Record-Type Files]
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-05-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35086NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
In response to a growing concern about hate crimes, the
United States Congress enacted the Hate Crime Statistics Act of
1990. The Act requires the attorney general to establish guidelines
and collect, as part of the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program,
data "about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on race,
religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where
appropriate the crimes of murder and non-negligent manslaughter,
forcible rape, aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation,
arson, and destruction, damage or vandalism of property." Hate crime
data collection was required by the Act to begin in calendar year 1990
and to continue for four successive years. In September 1994, the
Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act amended the Hate Crime
Statistics Act to add disabilities, both physical and mental, as
factors that could be considered a basis for hate crimes. Although the
Act originally mandated data collection for five years, the Church
Arson Prevention Act of 1996 amended the collection duration "for each
calendar year," making hate crime statistics a permanent addition to
the UCR program. As with the other UCR data, law enforcement agencies
contribute reports either directly or through their state reporting
programs. Information contained in the data includes number of victims
and offenders involved in each hate crime incident, type of victims,
bias motivation, offense type, and location type.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35086.v1
arrestsicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdisabilitiesicpsrdiscriminationicpsrethnicityicpsrhate crimesicpsrhomophobiaicpsrlaw enforcementicpsroffensesicpsrprejudiceicpsrracial tensionsicpsrreligionicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrviolenceicpsrFENWAY VI. Studies That Include Heterosexual PopulationsRCMD I. CrimeTPDRC I. TerrorismNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35086Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35086.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35018MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35018MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-05-14Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35018NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data provide information on the number of arrests
reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime
Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United
States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including
violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by
ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing, per reporting
police agency: an agency header record, and 1 to 43 detail offense
records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a
particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to logical
record length format with the agency header record variables copied
onto the detail records. Consequently, each record contains arrest
counts for a particular agency-offense.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35018.v1
arrest recordsicpsrarrestsicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrillegal gamblingicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrUniform Crime Reportsicpsrviolent crimeicpsrNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35018Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35018.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27981MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27981MiAaIMiAaI
Testing a Model of Domestic Abuse Against Elder Women and Barriers to Help-Seeking in Miami-Dade County, Florida, 2006
[electronic resource]
Frederrick Newman
2014-05-07Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR27981NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This study sought to understand perceived barriers to help-seeking for female victims of domestic abuse age 50 years and older (by a spouse, partner, adult child, grandchild, other relative or close friend) relative to the perceived barriers for women in the same age group who are not victims of such abuse. Additionally, the study explored the impact of key demographic variables of race and ethnicity, relationship to the presumed abuser, and age at the time of the survey on perceived barriers of victims. To address these research questions this study tested an empirical model that described relevant factors regarding perceived barriers to help-seeking and explored if and how this model changed based on the identified variables. Study participants represented a community sample of females age 50 years and older interested in participating in research regarding conflict in close personal relationships experienced by women in this target age range. Specific aims for the project were intended to lead to increased knowledge regarding perceived barriers to help-seeking among older women and, in particular, to develop a basis for describing (a) if and how these perceived barriers were unique to domestic abuse victims relative to non-victims in this age group and (b) how they varied based on selected variables.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27981.v1
domestic assaulticpsrdomestic violenceicpsrelder abuseicpsrfamily violenceicpsrspouse abuseicpsrvictim servicesicpsrNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNewman, FrederrickInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27981Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27981.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29522MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29522MiAaIMiAaI
Cross-National Comparison of Interagency Coordination Between Law Enforcement and Public Health
[electronic resource]
Joe Eyerman
,
Kevin J. Strom
2014-05-02Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR29522NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This project examined strategies for interagency coordination in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Ireland. The project's primary goal was to produce promising practices that will help law enforcement and public health agencies improve interagency coordination related to terrorist threats, as well as other public health emergencies. Phase I of this study used the Surveillance System Inventory (SSI). The SSI is a database that documents and describes public health and public safety surveillance systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Ireland. The purpose of the SSI was to summarize the status of coordination between law enforcement and public health agencies across these systems, as well as to highlight potentially useful systems for coordination and dual-use integration.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29522.v1
bioterrorismicpsremergency preparednessicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrpublic healthicpsrpublic safetyicpsrterrorismicpsrterrorist threaticpsrNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorEyerman, JoeStrom, Kevin J.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29522Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29522.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34981MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34981MiAaIMiAaI
National Prisoner Statistics, 1978-2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-04-23Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34981NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Prisoner Statistics (NPS) data collection began in 1926 in response to a congressional mandate to gather information on persons incarcerated in state and federal prisons. Originally under the auspices of the United States Census Bureau, the collection moved to the Bureau of Prisons in 1950, and then in 1971 to the National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, the precursor to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) which was established in 1979. Since 1979, the Census Bureau has been the NPS data collection agent.
The NPS is administered to 51 respondents. Before 2001, the District of Columbia was also a respondent, but responsibility for housing the District of Columbia's sentenced prisoners was transferred to the federal Bureau of Prisons, and by yearend 2001 the District of Columbia no longer operated a prison system.
The NPS provides an enumeration of persons in state and federal prisons and collects data on key characteristics of the nation's prison population. NPS has been adapted over time to keep pace with the changing information needs of the public, researchers, and federal, state, and local governments.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34981.v1
correctional systemicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrHIVicpsroffendersicpsrparoleicpsrprison inmatesicpsrstate correctional facilitiesicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII. Social Institutions and BehaviorNACJD III. CorrectionsUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34981Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34981.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR27282MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR27282MiAaIMiAaI
National Portrait of Domestic Violence Courts
[electronic resource]
Michael Rempel
,
Chris O'Sullivan
,
Julia Weber
2014-04-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR27282NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study was designed to create a portrait of domestic violence courts across America, specifically courtroom policies, procedures and goals were examined as described by court employees and prosecutors that work with the domestic violence courts. Geographic information on 338 courts was collected and organized in a national compendium of domestic violence courts. From this compendium a sample of 129 domestic violence courts was surveyed along with 74 prosecutors offices.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27282.v1
court casesicpsrcourt systemicpsrcourtsicpsrdeterrenceicpsrdomestic violenceicpsrgoalsicpsrprosecuting attorneysicpsrprosecutionicpsrrehabilitationicpsrvictim rightsicpsrvictim safetyicpsrNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD V. CourtsRempel , MichaelO'Sullivan, ChrisWeber, JuliaInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)27282Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR27282.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30581MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30581MiAaIMiAaI
National Crime Victimization Survey
[electronic resource]Workplace Risk Supplement, 2002
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-04-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR30581NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The primary purpose of the Workplace Risk Supplement (WRS) is to obtain accurate information regarding the incidence of violence in the workplace so that legislators and policymakers, as well as academic researchers, practitioners at the Federal, state and local levels, and special interest groups who are
concerned with workplace violence, can obtain a better understanding of the risk factors associated with workplace violence.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30581.v1
crimeicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsroffensesicpsrreactions to crimeicpsrrisk factorsicpsrvictimizationicpsrvictimsicpsrwork environmenticpsrworkplace violenceicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30581Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30581.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35023MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35023MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Supplementary Homicide Reports, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-04-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35023NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: SUPPLEMENTARY HOMICIDE REPORTS, 2012 (SHR) provide detailed information on criminal homicides reported to the police. These homicides consist of murders; non-negligent killings also called non-negligent manslaughter; and justifiable homicides. UCR Program contributors compile and submit their crime data by one of two means: either directly to the FBI or through their State UCR Programs. State UCR Programs frequently impose mandatory reporting requirements which have been effective in increasing both the number of reporting agencies as well as the number and accuracy of each participating agency's reports. Each agency may be identified by its numeric state code, alpha-numeric agency ("ORI") code, jurisdiction population, and population group. In addition, each homicide incident is identified by month of occurrence and situation type, allowing flexibility in creating aggregations and subsets.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35023.v1
arrestsicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrhomicideicpsrlaw enforcementicpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrvictimsicpsrNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35023Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35023.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35020MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35020MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Police Employee (LEOKA) Data, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-04-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35020NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data, Police Employee Data, 2012 file contains monthly data on felonious or accidental killings and assaults upon United States law enforcement officers acting in the line of duty. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) assembled the data and processed them from UCR Master Police Employee (LEOKA) data tapes.
Each agency record in the file includes the following summary variables: state code, population group code, geographic division, Metropolitan Statistical Area code, and agency name. These variables afford considerable flexibility in creating subsets or aggregations of the data.
Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as a periodic nationwide assessment of reported crimes not available elsewhere in the criminal justice system. Each year, this information is reported in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Police Employee (LEOKA) Data provide information about law enforcement officers killed or assaulted (hence the acronym, LEOKA) in the line of duty. The variables created from the LEOKA forms provide in-depth information on the circumstances surrounding killings or assaults, including type of call answered, type of weapon used, and type of patrol the officers were on.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35020.v1
arrestsicpsrassaults on policeicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrlaw enforcementicpsroffensesicpsrpolice deathsicpsrpolice officersicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrNACJD XIV. Homicide StudiesICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsDSDR VI. Population CharacteristicsUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35020Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35020.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR35017MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR35017MiAaIMiAaI
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data
[electronic resource]Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, 2012
United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2014-04-16Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR35017NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
These data provide information on the number of arrests reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program each month by police agencies in the United States. Although not as well known as the "Crimes Known to the Police" data drawn from the Uniform Crime Report's Return A form, the arrest reports by age, sex, and race provide valuable data on 43 offenses including violent, drug, gambling, and larceny crimes. The data received by ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing (per reporting police agency) an agency header record, and 1 to 12 monthly header reports, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to a rectangular format.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35017.v1
arrestsicpsrarsonicpsrassaulticpsrauto thefticpsrburglaryicpsrcountiesicpsrcrime ratesicpsrcrime reportingicpsrcrime statisticsicpsrdrug abuseicpsrfraudicpsrillegal gamblingicpsrlarcenyicpsrlaw enforcementicpsrmurdericpsroffensesicpsrrapeicpsrrobberyicpsrsex offensesicpsrUniform Crime ReportsicpsrvandalismicpsrweaponsicpsrICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD VIII. Official StatisticsUnited States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of InvestigationInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)35017Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35017.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR28301MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR28301MiAaIMiAaI
Field Study of Sex Trafficking in Tijuana, Mexico, 2008-2009
[electronic resource]
Sheldon Zhang
2014-04-10Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR28301NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The study examined human trafficking and the commercialized sex industry in Tijuana, Mexico. The research team conducted interviews with 220 women from the sex industry (Dataset 1), 92 sex trade facilitators (Dataset 2), 30 government/law enforcement officials (Dataset 3), and 20 community-based service providers (Dataset 4).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28301.v1
law enforcementicpsrnongovernmental organizationsicpsrorganized crimeicpsrpoliceicpsrprostitutionicpsrpublic officialsicpsrsex tourismicpsrsex traffickingicpsrsexual behavioricpsrNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemZhang, SheldonInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)28301Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR28301.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR30741MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR30741MiAaIMiAaI
Victim Participation in Intimate Partner Violence Prosecution - Implications for Safety
[electronic resource]Kalamazoo County, Michigan, 1999-2002
Karin V. Rhodes
,
Catherine Cerulli
,
Catherine L. Kothari
,
Melissa E. Dichter
,
Steve Marcus
,
James Wiley
2014-03-28Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR30741NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
This longitudinal mixed-methods study examined to what extent female intimate partner violence (IPV) victim participation in prosecution was associated with their future safety. The study followed a cohort of female IPV victims with cases the police presented to the prosecutor, in the year 2000, in a single Midwestern United States county (Kalamazoo County, Michigan) for a four-year period (1999-2002) across multiple systems (police, prosecutor, criminal court, civil court, hospital Emergency Departments) to assess the victim's experience with participation in IPV prosecution and her associated future help seeking, health and safety. Since this study utilized retrospective administrative data, subsequent IPV was defined as a future documented IPV-related police incident or an Emergency Department visit for IPV or injury. The data abstraction and analysis of the administrative data was informed by focus groups with survivors, advocates, and medical and criminal justice service providers, along with in-depth qualitative analysis of a stratified random sample of individual IPV cases. The final analytic dataset created by the research team integrated two types of data: (1) in-depth data about the index assault case and characteristics of the couple involved, and (2) longitudinal data about prior and subsequent IPV events spanning multiple systems: police, prosecutor, emergency department, and family court protection orders.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30741.v1
domestic violenceicpsrintimate partner violenceicpsrprosecutionicpsrvictim safetyicpsrvictim servicesicpsrvictimizationicpsrviolence against womenicpsrNACJD XIII. Violence Against WomenICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD X. VictimizationNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemRhodes, Karin V.Cerulli, CatherineKothari, Catherine L.Dichter, Melissa E.Marcus, SteveWiley, JamesInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)30741Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30741.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34276MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34276MiAaIMiAaI
Police-Public Contact Survey, 2011
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-03-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34276NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The Police-Public Contact Survey (PPCS) provides detailed information on the nature and
characteristics of face-to-face contacts between police and the public, including the
reason for and outcome of the contact. The PPCS interviews a nationally representative
sample of U.S. residents age 16 or older as a supplement to the National Crime
Victimization Survey. To date, the PPCS has been conducted six times by BJS:
The first survey - described in the BJS publication Police Use of Force: Collection of National Data
(NCJ 165040) - documented levels of contacts with police during 1996.
The second survey - described in Contacts between Police and the Public: Findings from the
1999 National Survey (NCJ 184957) - recorded police-citizen contacts in 1999. These data are
archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 1999: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 3151).
The third survey - described in Contacts between Police and the Public: Findings from the
2002 National Survey (NCJ 207845) - covered interactions between police and the public in
2002. These data are archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2002: [UNITED STATES]
(ICPSR 4273).
The fourth survey - described in the BJS publication Contacts between
Police and the Public, 2005 (NCJ 215243) - covered interactions between police and the
public in 2005. These data are archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2005: [UNITED
STATES] (ICPSR 020020).
The fifth survey - described in the BJS publication Contacts between Police and the
Public, 2008 (NCJ 234599) - covered interactions between police and the public in
2008. These data are archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2008 (ICPSR 32022).
The sixth survey (split sample design due to instrument changes) - new instrument findings described in
two publications: Police Behavior During Traffic and Street Stops, 2011 (NCJ 242937) and Requests for Police Assistance, 2011 (NCJ 242938) - covered interactions
between police and publice and public perceptions of police in 2011. These data are archived as POLICE-PUBLIC CONTACT SURVEY, 2011 (ICPSR 34276).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34276.v1
police citizen interactionsicpsrpolice community relationsicpsrpolice officersicpsrpolice use of forceicpsrpublic interesticpsrpublic opinionicpsrRCMD I. CrimeNACJD IX. PoliceICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34276Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34276.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34881MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34881MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Court Cases
[electronic resource]Integrated Data Base, 2012
Federal Judicial Center
2014-03-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34881NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official
public record of the business of the federal courts. The data
originate from district and appellate court offices throughout
the United States. Information was obtained at two points in
the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and
termination. The termination data (archived in this data
collection) contain information on both filing and
terminations, while the pending data (archived as a separate
data collection) contain only filing information on the most
recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate
and civil terminations data is the case. This collection also
contains data on criminal cases in federal courts. However, the
unit of analysis for the criminal data is the defendant, and a
defendant can be included in several cases.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34881.v1
administrationicpsrappellate courtsicpsrcase dismissalicpsrcase processingicpsrcivil lawicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrpretrial proceduresicpsrrecordsicpsrtrial courtsicpsrtrial proceduresicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemFederal Judicial CenterInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34881Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34881.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR29281MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2010 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR29281MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Court Cases
[electronic resource]Integrated Data Base Appellate and Civil Pending Data, 2012
Federal Judicial Center
2014-03-18Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2010ICPSR29281NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official
public record of the business of the federal courts. The data
originate from district and appellate court offices throughout
the United States. Information was obtained at two points in
the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and
termination. The termination data (archived as separate data collections each year) contain information on both filing and
terminations, while the pending data (archived as this data collection and updated annually) contain only filing information on the most
recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate
and civil pending data is the case.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29281.v3
administrationicpsrappellate courtsicpsrcase dismissalicpsrcase processingicpsrcivil lawicpsrcourt casesicpsrcriminal lawicpsrdefendantsicpsrdisposition (legal)icpsrfederal courtsicpsrjudicial decisionsicpsrlegal systemsicpsrpretrial proceduresicpsrrecordsicpsrtrial courtsicpsrtrial proceduresicpsrNACJD IV. Court Case ProcessingICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemFederal Judicial CenterInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)29281Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29281.v3 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34984MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2014 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34984MiAaIMiAaI
National Corrections Reporting Program, 2000-2012
[electronic resource]
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-03-13Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2014ICPSR34984NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP) compiles offender-level data on yearend custody population, admissions and releases from state and federal prisons and post-confinement community supervision. The data are used to monitor the nation's correctional population and address specific policy questions related to recidivism, prisoner reentry, and trends in demographic characteristics of the incarcerated and community supervision populations. The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) has administered the NCRP since 1983. The United States Bureau of the Census served as data collection agent for BJS until October 2010, when Abt Associates assumed this position.
From 2000 to 2009, NCRP data were archived each year in four, year-specific files that corresponded to the four files that states were asked to submit to the Census Bureau. The four files are: Prison Admissions (Part A), Prison Releases (Part B), Parole Exits (Part C), and Prison Custody (Part D). For example, the 2009 NCRP archive consists of prison admissions occurring in 2009, prison releases occurring in 2009, parole exits occurring in 2009, and prisoners in custody on December 31, 2009.
Starting in 2011, NCRP data will be archived in a single, multi-year Term Record file. A Term Record represents a single period of incarceration for an individual offender. Each year, the archived Term Record file will be replaced by a new Term Record file that incorporates new NCRP data collected and processed during the previous year, as well as updates to previously collected data. The Term Records were created from the Prison Admissions (Part A), Prison Releases (Part B), and Prison Custody (Part D) records submitted by states since 2000. With a few lines of computing code (included with the archive), an analyst can create a prison admission, release, or custody file from the Term Record file.
In addition to the Term Record file, four additional files are being archived: (1) Prison Admissions (Part A), Prison Releases (Part B), and Prison Custody (Part D) records that were not used in building the Term Record file, (2) Part C (Parole Exit), and (3) Part E (Post-Custody Community Supervision Program Entry), and Part F (Post-Custody Community Supervision Program Exit).
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34984.v1
correctional facilitiesicpsrcorrectional facilities (juveniles)icpsrcorrectional systemicpsrdemographic characteristicsicpsrfederal correctional facilitiesicpsrjail inmatesicpsrjuvenile offendersicpsrnational crime statistics (USA)icpsroffendersicpsroffensesicpsrparoleicpsrprison inmatesicpsrprobationicpsrstate correctional facilitiesicpsrNACJD VI. Criminal Justice SystemICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemNACJD III. CorrectionsNACJD VII. Crime and DelinquencyUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34984Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34984.v1 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34329MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34329MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Offenders in Prison at Year-End, 2010
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-03-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34329NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of sentenced offenders in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at year-end of fiscal year 2010. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34329.v2
correctional systemicpsroffendersicpsrprisonsicpsrNACJD III. CorrectionsICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice SystemUnited States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice StatisticsInter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.ICPSR (Series)34329Access restricted ; authentication may be required:http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34329.v2 nmm 22 4500ICPSR34328MiAaIm f a u cr mn mmmmuuuu150303s2013 miu f a eng d(MiAaI)ICPSR34328MiAaIMiAaI
Federal Justice Statistics Program
[electronic resource]Offenders Released From Prison, 2010
United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics
2014-03-11Ann Arbor, Mich.Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]2013ICPSR34328NumericTitle from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2015-03-03.AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.Also available as downloadable files.
The data contain records of sentenced offenders released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2010. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. Records of offenders who exit federal prison temporarily, such as for transit to another location, to serve a weekend sentence, or for health care, are not included in the exiting cohort. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Cf.: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34328.v2
correctional systemicpsroffendersicpsrprisonsicpsr