Common issues … and suggestions for improvements

health

Post navigation

Some time ago, I wrote an article The Impact of Climate Geoengineering on Agriculture, where I presented the results of the decade long climate geoengineering found by some American authors. I thought I was already done with this hence I couldn’t do much. Then the sky started looking more and more like in a science fiction.

Strange hallo around the Sun

Again, I thought I’m done with this topic, and guess what, I stumbled upon an article Nano-weapons: Tomorrow’s Global Security Threat, where the author Greg Bonadies writes about three decades old idea presented by Eric Drexler (1980, 1986) about “kinematic cellular automata, built from reconfigurable molecular modules.” Or, as they are called today: self-replicating nano-robots (replibots). The general idea is that the genetic engineering and nanotechnology enable the scientists to produce self-replicating nano-robots (synthetic DNA) that perform various tasks when they attach themselves to the host. A host could be any living being that has a DNA and RNA, cells. No insane idea is farfetched enough for the military, and self-replicating nano-robots seem to be an ideal weapon – invisible to the naked eye and programmed to perform the tasks with the utmost nano precision, without any losses. The ideal soldiers, thus. Actually, it is all in one, weapon that threatens to destroy all life on the planet and the ideal soldiers that perform the task invisibly no matter what.

While I was gathering material to write the article for my blog issuesandsuggestions.wordpress.com, I came across Morgellons, as those affected call them. What those victims describe, resembles the working of the self-replicating nano-robots (replibots), described in Greg Bonadies article. So, I guess, they might have been already tested.

Actually they have been tested already. In Plaid Zebra we can read that DNA nanobots will target cancer cells in the first human trial using a terminally ill patient (27th March, 2015). The next one in the same web magazine we can read that Engineers just developed nano-robots that can reduce CO2 levels by 88% in seawater (10th October, 2015). It seems that nanobots are in full swing, and the pattern is the same as usual. First, the human concerns are addressed and made public, so it all looks benevolent and goodhearted. But usually, behind the scenes, some other development might go on. So, if we believe that the nanobots are going to be used solely for benevolent purpose, then we haven’t read enough history books. Like for instance the paragraph below – it does make us presume that the cause of the so called Morgellon disease is nonobots. So, were the victims chosen deliberately or was this some experiment gone wrong?

Now 71, Mitchell has been ill for eight years, which she describes as a “survival blur.” In fact, she’s been sick throughout her whole life — polio, scarlet fever, dengue, abscessed ovaries — and now suffers from the skin disorder Morgellons, a “weird, incurable disease that seems like it’s from outer space,” which many doctors find mysterious, and which Mitchell has described this way: “Fibers in a variety of colors protrude out of my skin like mushrooms after a rainstorm. They cannot be forensically identified as animal, vegetable, or mineral.”

Now, maybe watching this happening might not be enough for life on the planet we live upon. I wonder, how would it be if the sky would be given the same status as national parks have, where no experiments and other atrocities (wars, for instance) are allowed. Just how many people would have to sign such a petition for the UN to give the sky the same status and rights as the national parks on Earth have?

Once I read an Ethiopian story about Adam and Eve. It narrated as follows. Adam and Eve lived as light beings solely in spirit in a sacred way. They were all made out of sacred light. They lived in the Garden of Eden, where they didn’t need to eat, drink and digest, dress and so forth. All the material part of life we know was absent. Then one day some mischievous spiritual being caught them into a trap by sending them the idea to eat a fruit of a tree. They fell into this trap, took a bite and were banished from the Garden of Eden. After they were thrown out, they got their physical bodies or their light bodies somehow solidified. First, they were so hurt, because they had to eat that they wanted to die. Nevertheless, they were somehow encouraged or even forced to exist in that new material world, where they had to eat, digest and dress. They felt very ashamed of the newly acquired physical characteristics of their materialized existence. No matter how they tried to return to the Garden of Eden into purity of sacred light or perish in their materialized existence, they were forced to exist further on in their physical existence and even procreate.

Now look at where this banishment out of sacred light of existence has brought the humankind. Except for some breatharians and those who live by the sunlight, the majority of us are eating other beings’ children (fruits, seeds, etc.) or bodies of grown up beings. It looks like we have turned into Hansels and Gretchens where our minds are being kept in a trap, where given ideas feed our minds similar to the way the witch fed Hansel and Gretchen when they were kept in her cage. The settings (cage) are more technically equipped and comfortable nowadays, but the general idea is very similar. So, we believe what we are told, whether true or not.

Some years ago many people were using a particular diary product, advertised as a particularly good for bowels. Some years later a research proved that that diary product isn’t any better than any else. By then many people’s minds were kept in a trap of the advertised idea.

See, milk is healthy only as much as the cow is healthy and eating her natural chosen food. Some decades ago, I spent a month in high mountains as a herdsman’s assistant. Cows were grazing and running freely and eating only fresh grass, even if they went in search for it half the mountain top away. They would never even try the grass upon which some fertilizing agents were strewn. Their milk scented of flowering wild mountain flowers and grasses they ate and its thickness was consistent even if it was left in a container. We have been making cheese, sweet quark, and sweet cream, butter and sour milk and sour cream out of their fresh, unpasteurized and unhomogenized milk. It worked. We poured milk into a cup and left it stay for three days and got sour milk with some sour cream upon it. Now, if I buy a bottle of milk out of an automat its thickness will not remain consistent and I would not be able to make sour milk out of it.

There are worse cases of captivity then the upper example of advertisement. Maybe, if we can switch off the mind feeders for a while, then perhaps we would be able to hear what our own body is telling us or even our own thoughts.

Few days ago I passed by a nearby multinational market chain store and a happy father was waving with a package of potato chips to his toddler infant held in mother’s hand, saying cheerfuly, »Look, I brought this for you.« The kid was happily smiling back.

Yet, another day in the exactly the same store I saw a joyous young family with yet another toddler in mother’s arms, and again the father waving a package of potato chips to a smiling kid, saying: »This is the one you like, isn’t it.«

I asked myself then, »Are we really all enemies of sort to one another, from the conception on? « Some intentionally, and most of us unintentionally. I don’t mean this as an acusation. Enemies have the tendency to mislead and deceive in order to manipulate, exploit and use another being or beings. Lies are among adversaries’ greatest weapons.

Are we really giving one another only what advertisements tell us to give and don’t look outside that advertise box we are captivated, programmed and conditioned in? I mean chips aren’t considered a really healthy food, so consuming it from early childhood can’t be really beneficial. And the same is with many other things, events, issues …a list without end.

I looks like, no matter how long we are schooled, we seem to be are enemies to one another and unaware of it. Maybe we wouldn’t like it, if we would know how we poison and destroy ourselves and the world around us.

At the time I was studying at the university, we were told never to drink alcohol at the time of conception, pregnancy or breastfeeding, because the embryo and later the child eats what mother eats. And the embryo/child feels what the mother feels because the embryo lives in the mother’s body and the newborn is very closely related. They are in fact so closely related that the embryo learns the sound of the mothers’ voice, and a newborn is capable of recognizing it. And the same is true with animals.

In fact, each of us resonates with his/hers own frequency. So, when a mother suffers, for example, the child picks up that frequency, and when she is happy, the kid picks up that one frequency.

But when our minds are tuned to the advertising, then we resonate with the ads frequency. Our minds get filled with their ideas of what to or what not to do. Some 20 years ago I read a book of a Dutch couple, who simply became so miserable that they finally had enough of being constantly told, »Do this, buy this, don’t do this, this is good for you«, and so forth. Part of their feeling of being miserable was that they were constantly chasing what they were told in the ads or on the TV or radio and were constantly underachieving, chasing what they were told to have or achieve in life. So, they switched off the TV and the radio, and soon there was silence around them and from that outer silence they figured they can reach some inner calmness and freedom of choice.

And on the other hand, I remember a book of an extremely successful French copywriter, who asked himself what he was doing only after a man killed himself watching his ad while he was driving.

So, are we all really each other’s enemies on this planet? Is the only mode of existence to be an enemy to others in order to survive?

Or am I maybe wrong? Perhaps, if each person stays out somewhere in the nature long enough to figure out how nature feels like, we’d come up with some other solutions.

Some decades ago I spent a month in the mountains without TV, shops, newspapers, etc. There was occasional ariplane to be heard, cow bells, wind, rain when it rained, and that was all of the daily sounds I have heard there. Before I made myself a meal I had to fetch wood, make a fire and even then it took about an hour and a half for a casserole to be cooked (vegetables were growing in the garden). Every day I was truly tired of all the physical work, but it felt like a healthy tiredness (from all the fresh air and work), and I fell sound asleep when I laid down on my matress. Yet, I didn’t miss anything. When I returned to the town, I cycled to my job and couldn’t figure out at first what was bothering me so much. Later I figured it was noise of the city. Cities are very noisy, believe me.

Most of us don’t read the ingredients content’s on the food packages, and freshly baked bread most of the time doesn’t have it. So, we don’t know exactly what we eat.

Why am I tackling this topic at all, when it is hardly interesting? Well, I guess I’m some antiquity or something like this. Maybe I’m in the years when the world, the so called progress and human endeavors look awkward.

The thing is, that one day I went to a local store and wondered how come that I see so many obese people around me, while there were practically none in my youth. Okay, we were mostly walking to the school and spent afternoons playing outdoors or helping our parents and relatives, neighbors or friends.

So we were moving a lot and burned the so called calorie intake in no time.

But there is yet another thing that passes us unnoticed.

Here. I’m going to list you some of the daily commands from my childhood:

Don’t overeat yourself.

Don’t eat sweets for a breakfast.

Don’t eat sweets before a regular meal.

Don’t eat sweets – it makes holes in your teeth.

Don’t eat too much before you go to sleep.

Drink water, if you are thirsty, or bitter lukewarm yeast&chicory coffee on a hot summer day, or unsweetened tea.

Eat an apple if you a hungry during meals.

Chew the food thoroughly.

Eat slowly. Don’t throw the food into yourself like into a sack.

Looks like these words still resonate in me and compose my diet.

When I look around, it looks like now everything has to be sweet and fast. If we look the packages we bring into our dwellings more closely we might be surprised. I was.

But before that I read a sentence that raised my interest to look this topic more closely. The sentence goes as follows: »At the beginning of the 20th century – before the widespread cultivation of sugar beets and imports of sugar from cane – intake per capita in Europe was below 5 kg per year rising to the 40-60 kg per year seen in Europe today.« (Health in All Policies, Prospects and Potentials, 2006, http://www.eu2006.fi )

Actually sugar is in many products, we wouldn’t expect it in. Sugar is a preservative, but we used it in preserving sweet food, like jams, jellies, stewed fruit, and cookies. Now, if you read the ingredients content’s you can find it in meat, bread and stewed sour vegetables – in many foods you won’t expect to find sugar.

And guess what, now children eat their cereals in milk for breakfast, and a cup of it contains so much sugar as 6 doughnuts, was told on The Doctor’s TV several years ago (sorry, I can’t find the archived file to state the exact time when the show was aired).

This is one side of this scenario. The other is that people producing sugarcane are mostly so poor they can’t afford themselves much more than to eat one raw sugarcane stalk a day. So on one side we have people getting obese and sick from the excessive intake of a product of a processed plant that is actually a medicinal plant. And on the other side we have starving people who survive by the day consuming that very stalk of that plant.

A decade ago I read a book written by Waris Dirie, where she describes how they brushed their teeth in the desert with a tooth stick made out of Neem tree (Salvadora persica). Until then I didn’t pay much attention to the toothpaste, except that I wanted as much herbs in there as possible. Later I found out that in Europe people brushed their teeth with mastic tree (Pistacia Lentiscus or Pistacia Therebintus) tooth sticks or with sticks made of Hazelnut bush. Oil made of mastic gum or leaves helps to keep the teeth in place and prevents paradontosis and kills the bacteria Heliobacter Pylori – as some of the studies state. While in India people used the Neem tree (Salvadora persica).

What I did notice though is that after using very natural toothpaste (bought or self-made) for some years it also had a healing and soothing effect on my intestines. Actually it worked like daily medicine for my alimentary canal, while the ordinary toothpastes work just the opposite.

Together with the explanation of teeth in TCM I also found an interesting German Tooth gel with 35 various etheric oils to activate each meridian of the teeth. I haven’t tried it, so don’t consider this as an advertisement. It is maybe worth considering this thing called daily mouth hygiene – do we help our intestines with it?

Like this:

The Climate Geoengineering(CG) is being carried out for nearly two decades now. Some[1] state it has started in 1996. The precise composition of the aerosols used in CG in a particular moment is known only to those who order it. History of the CG dates back to the WW2 with production of fog during bombing and after WW2 it continued as hail prevention, while in English speaking countries it was also carried out as Air Force experiments on the inhabitants (i.e. Project Clover Leaf, etc.) The CG intensified in 1996 as a project of American Air Force to own the weather[2] and as a trial to combat global warming, which was based on climate models – according to some of the experts; some of those climate models have a 100% error. There is no need to spend time discussing[3] global warming, hence even some more visible advocates of global warming like prof. Chris Folland state that the data aren’t important, hence their recommendations are based on models. We should mention, though, that the climate changes were invented in England in 19th century, but the idea wasn’t picked up, at least not until it was used by Margaret Thatcher[4], what caused closing of the coal mines and transition to the nuclear power production of the electric energy. For quite some time, it is being mentioned that the stock of crude oil will expire. King M. Huber[5] who claimed that the stock of crude oil will run out, made this up. Of course this doesn’t mean that the changes regarding the use of the crude oil wouldn’t be welcome. Although my car mechanic says that the transition to the electric car will cause the economy to collapse entirely. It looks like when those on the top of the pyramid want to achieve something, they invent a problem and repeat it long enough for the masses to react on the presented problem and then propose the solutions, like implementing new taxes or technologies. Climate Geoengineering has mainly two major ways of operation: Solar Radiation Management (SRM; SAG- Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering is part of it) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)[6]. How doescloud seeding – chemtrails – carried out in troposphere fit in this operation is not exactly explained. During the UNEP Nagoya conference in 2010 a five (5) year moratorium on geoengineering treaty was signed except for the experiments in minor extent[7].

In May 2012 the ETC Groupin the framework of the project HOME (Hands off Mother Earth) managed to prevent an English trial to inject sulphur into the atmosphere (project named SPICE in the framework of geoengineering),The ETC group is inviting everyone who is willing to oppose the geoengineering to: www.handsoffmotherearth.org How it is to breathe sulphur we know from times when we were heating on coal. Maybe something can be achieved this way.

Geoengineering is primarily big business and will not solve the problem, because it was established primarily to use the weather in military purposes and striving to own what isn’t their property. Maybe people should demand to declare the sky as a nature resort where any experiments with chemicals, nanoparticles, artificial DNA and ELF waves (radar technology which seems to be mostly used on the Earth poles) are forbidden[8]. Meanwhile, in 1997, the trading with the weather started on Chicago stock exchange CME-GLOBEX. In 2012, 8 metropoles where included in this trade, some of them European. In USA cloud seeding was going on for quite a while by now[9]. That’s why also the consequences are more thorough. Some advocates of prohibition of geoengineering (Rosalind Peterson, Barbara H. Peterson and others) as a consequences of geoengineering mention:

Reduced harvest, because the plants can’t ripen due to the lack of sunlight;

Acidification of the soil due to the use of aluminum, iron and other particles[10], and various salts;

Dying of the trees from top to bottom;

Disappearing of the bees.

Other authors[11] mention reappearance of rachitis where it was extinguished (due to vitamin D insufficiency), incidences of new diseases, decrease of the immunity of living beings, disappearance of the bats, changing pH value of the soil. Among other consequences we can also find lowering of the sky for about 1 km due to the less clouds being formed in the higher layers of the atmosphere, changed composition of the atmosphere, changed composition of the clouds, changed outlook of the sky, the increase of CO2 due to the increased air traffic[12] , and presumably increased use of fuel due to the increased air traffic. As it was proved already in 1998 that the blue lightthe receptors in human eyes receive from the sky during a clear sunny day increases immunity, vigilance, brain activity (e.g. people make less errors) and more appropriate emotional responses, we can presume that an increase of the milkieness of the sky decreases the benefits of the blue light[13]. American authors state that serious consequences of the stratospheric aerosol geoengineering for the living beings appear after 10 years of its execution. Higher concentration of aluminum in the air also increases the incidence of Alzheimer disease. It is not difficult to establish that a poisonous atmosphere won’t contribute to the health of the living beings on Earth. The articles and reports from US mention primarily chemical exhausts; newer are also nano exhausts or nanotrails. For this purpose MEMS or GEMSare used (MEMS – micro electromechanical sensors, GEMS – global electromechanical sensors), that are used to detect the activity inside the clouds and can land on the plate, or in the eyes or noses and are considered a cause of the increase of the allergies. Yet, these are only two among the long list of the consequences of the stratospheric aerosol geoengineering. Condensation trailsdue to the aircraft gas exhausts are forming on ca. 8000 m altitude and -40 degree Celsius and 70% humidity and disperse after 2-3 minutes, because they are made of ice crystals; with higher humidity they linger longer; in higher altitudes the condensation trails don’t form.

Disclaimer: I stopped following this topic two years ago, so the data are from back then. I didn’t conduct any study; and I merely present the data found in the open sources on the internet.

About half a century ago, I lived in a country with the inflation reaching thousand percent and over. Apart from running out of money right in the middle of the month and being unable to get to our jobs except by foot or by bicycle, it was fun. We were all millionaires. Money wasn’t anything serious anymore. The situation resembled the situation in »Gone with the Wind« where money was used for stuffing the holes in the walls. We played children’s roulette with it instead. Then, overnight, our country lost 80% of its market, the 30% allowed profit margin, and only domestic market remained.

During high inflation times our self-sustenance with the food produced in our own country was 80-90%. People owned small farms, where some of the owners farmed after their full time jobs. Other people rented the land from private farmers and some from the state. House owners usually had gardens, where fruits, vegetables and even poultry or other small animals were kept. Yet others rented small gardening plots in the town’s vicinity, where they grew vegetables and fruits. Growing own food wasn’t disgraceful then.

And, we were sharing within the communities – what one had in abundance he/she would offer to the neighbor and receive something useful in return. People regularly went to help their relatives who were farming and received food in return. In afternoons many went to help their friends or relatives to build or repair their houses.

Some 25 years later those gardening plot groups were banished, because their shags were disrupting the views of the town officials. This happened while hypermarkets were built. So, at present we have about 2,5 square meters shopping space per person (above EU average) and some 10-20% of self-sustenance with the domestic food production, declining expertise in agricultural knowledge among the young generations, an increasing expertise among the poor in chasing discounted food offered by the continuous marketing actions and no limits to the profit margins. Supermarkets offer a separate box with discounted vegetables and fruits nearing their expiration date and a cart to place a purchased item for the poor. A gloomy sight!

Then in 2005, when I visited my relatives in the USA, I observed how people used their credit cards. The situation looked so familiar, I was sure it won’t last long before the whole system crashes. I didn’t need to wait more than three years. The entropic system crumbled like a house of cards and spread all over the planet.

However, it looks like poor people can support themselves during recession when they can grow food on their own or rented gardening plots. The more natural the food production, the better it is as we can read in Food and Permaculture, where David Blume states that “permacultural farming yields 8 times more than what USDA claims possible” and 22% CEC (Cation Exchange Capacity) for the soil (the divide line between dead and alive soil is 5% CEC).

I presume that every municipality owns some (surrounding) land. So, my suggestion is that every municipality on the planet offers a free of charge gardening plot in the town’s vicinity to its poorest members. Maybe they can even offer some flat roofs, if they can hold the weight of the soil and vegetables. It wouldn’t be such entirely new idea, some states and communities have provided themselves with gardening before as we can see in the documentary series Around the World in 80 Gardens by Colin Jones and other similar documentaries.

There should be no rent for the poorest; the only condition should be that they learn how to grow organically produced vegetables and fruits. And maybe they can dig a well for the watering. There are more benefits to this than just food supply. Usually it is more satisfactory to produce own food than to beg for it at one of the charity institutions. It usually has more dignity in it and people don’t lose their connectedness to the land so quickly. Their children might pick up some agricultural knowledge while helping to garden as well. And in due time they might become not only experts in gardening, but also experts in avoiding food adds for they will learn that the most delicious food comes from the soil and not from the store shelves. In this way the poor might not live in such scarcity and the agricultural knowledge won’t be lost either.