FYIHere's what the United Nations International Health Organization reports,,, The Lancet study of a couple years ago is even more extensive.Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five yearsafter diagnosis:U.S. 65%England 46%Canada 42%Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who receivedtreatment within six months:U.S. 93%England 15%Canada 43%Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received itwithin six months:U.S. 90%England 15%Canada 43%Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one withinone month:U.S. 77%England 40%Canada 43%Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per millionpeople:U.S. 71England 14Canada 18Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they arein "excellent health":U.S. 12%England 2%Canada 6%And now for the last statistic:National Health Insurance?U.S. NOEngland YESCanada YES

Does the Obama-care website work? Consider the fact that multiple computer experts have openly testified and admitted before Congress that the website is a computer hackers dream come true that compromises personal, financial, and medical information on numerous levels. For delusional goose-stepping followers of Adolf Obama the website is perfect. However, for real Americans who live in a place called reality it is still a non-functional mess.

The media is also not reporting some significant legal challenges to Obamacare. Like, did you know that the language within the law explicitly forbids subsidies for those who sign up on healthcare.gov? Only those who sign up on the state-run exchanges are supposed to be eligible for subsidies. The intent was to incentivize the states to establish their own exchanges. So when those who sign up on healthcare dot gov are offered a subsidy, the government is actually violating its own law. The state of Oklahoma is suing the IRS for this very reason. Check out some of the legal challenges against this train wreck. You will be amazed at what a mess this law is.