As part of its celebrations for the 90th anniversary of the Le Mans 24 Hour Race, the Automobile Club de l'Ouest is giving us all the chance to vote for a favourite car from each of the 10 decades of the race. The greatest car of each decade will then be chosen according to these votes and those of a panel of experts.

Sadly, it isn't a completely free vote - the ACO has already narrowed down the choices to just three cars for each decade - so no chance to vote for the 1950 Cadillac Le Monstre but still a fun way to fill a few minutes while you wait for March to come.

Ford GT40- winning le mans 4 times on the trotMazda 787/787B- Rotary engine was a great carPorsche 956- Brilliant dominantJaguar XJR-9- Also a a brilliant car Audi R8- Was unbeatable at the time Audi R10 first diesel to win the le mans 24 hours

You chose the car not even capable of being classified as the greatest one ever

I chose the one that has pushed the boundaries in terms of layout, design, and efficiency more than any other in quite a while. The e-tron while being a winner and advancing hybrid tech in endurance racing is really just an iteration of the the same thing Audi has been doing for years.

Will all prototypes looks like this anytime soon? Of course not, but if made others rethink their approach in any significant way it was an influential car.

You chose the car not even capable of being classified as the greatest one ever

I chose the one that has pushed the boundaries in terms of layout, design, and efficiency more than any other in quite a while. The e-tron while being a winner and advancing hybrid tech in endurance racing is really just an iteration of the the same thing Audi has been doing for years.

Will all prototypes looks like this anytime soon? Of course not, but if made others rethink their approach in any significant way it was an influential car.

I wasn't knocking your choice, I just thought it was funny that you chose the one car that wasn't actually competing. I think the Delta Wing hype will fizzle as the possibilities of including it in any series in a meaningful way dwindle, and people realize there is no value to running it in its own series because driving it doesn't prepare young drivers for anything bigger, manufacturers don't want to just show off engines in a spec chassis in a support series when they can do it in places like Indy Car, or build their own chassis anywhere, and the makers aren't geared up enough to offer a complete package as cheaply as say, Oreca can provide LMPC cars.

You chose the car not even capable of being classified as the greatest one ever

I chose the one that has pushed the boundaries in terms of layout, design, and efficiency more than any other in quite a while. The e-tron while being a winner and advancing hybrid tech in endurance racing is really just an iteration of the the same thing Audi has been doing for years.

Will all prototypes looks like this anytime soon? Of course not, but if made others rethink their approach in any significant way it was an influential car.

I wasn't knocking your choice, I just thought it was funny that you chose the one car that wasn't actually competing. I think the Delta Wing hype will fizzle as the possibilities of including it in any series in a meaningful way dwindle, and people realize there is no value to running it in its own series because driving it doesn't prepare young drivers for anything bigger, manufacturers don't want to just show off engines in a spec chassis in a support series when they can do it in places like Indy Car, or build their own chassis anywhere, and the makers aren't geared up enough to offer a complete package as cheaply as say, Oreca can provide LMPC cars.

I admit that I parsed your initial post incorrectly, misreading what you meant by classification. You're right it wasn't able to place in any class. However it was the first car to be entered in the Garage 56 experimental car category. Which is something that I hope they continue to allow, and that there are people out there willing to expend the time, energy, and money to develop these types of "outside the box" designs and run them against the top endurance racers in the world.

I don't think the Delta, as it stands, will be the future, but there are concepts there that could be incorporated into future designs of prototype cars and push the edges a bit more than the incremental changes that have been seen over the last 10-15 years.

Prototype cars didn't always look like they do now, and things like the Delta Wing will mean that they won't look like this in the future.

There have been great ones for sure.The two that pop out for me are:1. The Ford MK4 GT (so good it got banned)2. The Mazda (4 rotor) 787 B car (it was so good it got banned)

The euros are an imature bunch as they tend to change rules when some one bitch slaps them in their home race.

The Mazda was never banned. Only the rotary engine was banned. The FIA said only 3.5-liter engines, like the ones used in F1 and by a few sports car teams at the time, would be allowed from 1992 on. IIRC it had nothing to do with the engine being so good, and the car itself was not really that successful outside of that 1 race.

_________________"No, there is no terrible way to win. There is only winning."Jean-Pierre Sarti

As much as I loved the Mazda, being the only rotary engine one and so on, it had 1 win out of 21 races (total races, not only Le Mans) and it seriously lacked pace some times, only for reliability making up as other cars failed. How can they justify it being a legend if it doesn't have the results as well?