Nevertheless, official NASA transcripts and blatant censorship of audio transmissions don't get any more ominous.

Over the past year, I have discovered that there are many mysteries in which NASA and the moon share. I've already provided some evidence of NASA obscuring certain elements during the Apollo Missions (more below) - but were they already aware and prepared for spooky things being seen or heard on the moon before the Apollo missions were even launched?

Strange lights and objects have been recorded on our moon for hundreds of years. In 1787, legendary astronomer, Sir William Herschel, recorded strange lights traveling across the dark lunar surface. On one particular occasion of that same year, he spotted 3 red lights in the darkness of the lunar surface, describing the brightest one as being brighter than a recently discovered comet. He also believed there to be large "lunar cities" within the moon's craters and strongly believed in extraterrestrial life - something almost laughable during the 18th century.

The classical Greek philosopher, mathematician and scientist Plato also reported anomalous lights on the moon sometime around 400 BC. There is even a crater named after him which experiences high volumes of 'transient lunar phenomenon' - a term that NASA uses to describe these spooky lunar lights. Between the years of 1540 and 1967, over 570+lights and flashes were recorded over the moon's face. While NASA and other lunar scientists attribute these moving and flashing lights to outgassing and impacts - few reports concerning these phenomena are ever published inpeer reviewedscientific journals and are rarely ever discussed among the scientific community.

So could great historical minds like Sir William Herschel have been correct? Could it really be possible for a race of extraterrestrials to have been living on our moon for hundreds or thousands of years without public knowledge on Earth?

There are several official NASA photos taken throughout it's lunar expeditions which often depict some extremely large, artificial-looking, structures on the lunar surface. Some of these structures have been estimated to be several miles tall.

However, NASA has tried their best over the years to blur and obscure many of these structures. Often their attempts are extremely blatant.

So now we've got some evidence of moving luminous objects and large structures on the moon's surface, and furthermore, that NASA is trying very hard to hide and explain away these things. But what else can we look at? How about the moon's interior? If an extraterrestrial race is hiding on the moon, wouldn't the interior would be the safest and most reclusive spot to hide?

"...according to an analysis of the moon's motion, it appears that the moon is hollow: if the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."

In a March 1970 article of Popular Science titled 'How APOLLO 13 Will Probe the Moon's Interior', former SS Nazi & director at NASA, Dr. Wernher von Braun wrote, concerning the crash of Apollo 12's 2.5 ton Lunar Module into the lunar surface;

"The astounding result of that crash: The moon rang like a bell for nearly an hour, indicating some strange and unearthly underground structure."

In that same article, published a month before Apollo 13's failed lunar landing, von Braun goes on to say;

"An Apollo 13 "spectacular" will be the meteor-like crash on the moon of the great Saturn V rocket's whole top stage and instrument unit, totaling more than 15 tons...

...This will be a dramatic scale-up of the Apollo 12 experiment."

Indeed it was. Despite technical malfunctions preventing the Apollo 13 crew from landing on the moon, they still managed to carry out the task of crashing the Saturn V third stage rocket (S-IV B) into it.

This time the moon rang out for over 3 hours!

Back at NASA headquarters in Houston, CAPCOM made this remark to the Apollo 13 astronauts after impact;

"Aquarius, we see the results now from 12's seismometer. Looks like your booster just hit the Moon, and it's rocking a little bit."

However more recently, based on new 'state-of-the-art' seismological analysis of the same Apollo-era data, NASA has concluded that the moon is not hollow - but rather has an 'Earth-like core' made up of mostly mantle with a solid inner core surrounded by a fluid outer core.

So why then, did it ring like a bell for over 3 hours!?

Many scientists opposed to the idea of a hollow moon argue that the lunar crust would have to be extremely dense in order to support the theory - based on the behavior of objects interacting with the moon's gravitational field.

This is something that makes sense - if you are thinking in context of the moon being a 100% natural body. One thing you have to take into account though, is that scientist to this day still have no solid claimsas to where the moon actually came from.

Is it possible that it was once a natural celestial body that was hollowed out into various cavities with massive tunneling systems? Could that help to explain the highly anomalous mass concentrations of gravity(mascons) throughout the moon?

New evidence discovered in 2009, confirmed a network of underground tunnel systems, which would be ideal for human habitation. Arizona State University's lead researcher on the topic, Mark Robinson, had this to say;

"They could be entrances to a geologic wonderland... The tunnels offer a perfect radiation shield and a very benign thermal environment..."

In 2010, NASA released a series of images taken by their Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) which displayed the moon's topography in never before seen clarity and detail.

I can't help but notice how similar our moon looks in comparison to a metal-plated ball covered in dust that's been sprinkled with water. Not much variation of crater depth - as if something below the dusty surface is preventing much impact damage to the inner-exterior & interior.

Does all of this truly indicate that the moon is a partially artificial object inhabited by an extraterrestrial civilization? I would once again like to point out that we haven't been back there in over 40 years.

It's becoming increasingly obvious that someone doesn't want us to know the whole truth. But why? What does NASA know about the moon that we don't? For starters, NASA knows, at the very least, that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth.

How do I know this? Because NASA astronauts told me so.

If multiple former NASA astronauts are admitting the presence of extraterrestrial life on and around Earth - why are so many people still clueless about it today?

Apparently, NASA wants to distract us from our own Earth and moon. They would like us instead to focus on another celestial duo. Freemasonic NASA spokesman Buzz Aldrin explains:

...and what else have we recently learned about Mars' orbiting celestial potato?

You might look into the Russian Moon Research and Report stating that no natural object of this size and mass would be in this most 'unnatural' orbit around the earth ! 2 Scientist spent a couple of years of intense research and calculations to draw this conclusion whch was ultimately published in leading scientific journal

There is strong evidence that the moon acts as a Giant Command and Control Centre for the Anunnaki ETs from Orion. They are behind what we refer to as the Illuminati Elite Bloodlines on Earth i.e. the Rothschild Banking Family, Rockefellors, Carnegies, Duponts, Windsors etc.

What greater deception than to make the People believe that the Moon is a 'natural object' lol...when in fact it is a massive space Station 'towed' here eons ago during a 'Star Wars'? The Zulu Nation and the Hopi Indians talk about the Moon being towed to its present position by a Race of ETs.

Honestly, I think it's conspiracy theorists filling in the holes and unknowns of modern science with E.T. fantasies and imagination.

"The moon rang like a bell for several hours." -von Braun Really? I'm pretty sure that's the interpretation of a Rocket Engineer and not a Geologist. How would they have known that it "rang like a bell".. the only intruments to record the impact of Apollo 12's module were instruments set up 4 miles away by Apollo 11; which included a magnetometer, a gas sniffer (to analyze the lack of atmosphere), and a seismometer. I won't explain what a seismometer measures, but I can tell you that it's not anything that monitors soundwaves audible to human ears. So, bottom line is, Von Braun's comment is an ignorant observation of lunar seismograph readings that recorded Apollo 12's module crashing into the moon's surface. This is just one of the many weak points that the author throws out there and expects the readers to "take his word for it" without any references or citations to anything of relevance.

We can measure and observe the moon's gravitational pull on us from Earth, so if the moon were a giant, hollow, artificial object it would not exert any force on earth. i.e. - We wouldn't experience tidal influxes.

Yes please. During the televised Moon landings of July 1969, NASA showed footage of 3 small lights simultaneously travelling radially outward perfectly following 3 canals in perfectly straight vectors from the crater Plato. The voice over said they were dust storms which is an atmospheric phenomenon. As the Moon's atmosphere is to all intents and purposes non existent and therefore void of meteorological events, what were these Swamp Gas? Weather Balloons?, or Venus?; that happen to be moving at over 300 mph (if the NASA data is correct, and there have been discrepancies). I have a friend that was an editor at channel nine Sydney who still has footage event but its on VCR.

To place yourself within the same knowledgeable sphere as Von Braun shows your own lack of intelligence...you`re nowhere near understanding what this man discovered or has knowledge of...get over yourself.

Well David,have you considered the fact that all living things responds to vibrations???water,earthcrust,trees,animals,humans just to name a few and the fact that we react to vibrations in different ways depending on the vibrations.low vibrations high vibrations and so on.and that a seismograph will pick up this!??just a thought and a fact you should check up on:)

Well David,have you considered the fact that all living things responds to vibrations???water,earthcrust,trees,animals,humans just to name a few and the fact that we react to vibrations in different ways depending on the vibrations.low vibrations high vibrations and so on.and that a seismograph will pick up this!??just a thought and a fact you should check up on:)"

rabbithole, I'm sure you understand that not all vibrations are sound? Or maybe you don't. Vibrations do not equal ringing. If you stub your toe, do you hear a ringing sound like a bell? No. But you sure did send vibrations through whatever you hit along with your foot and body.

I dont have a lot of knowledge on the subject but i do know that due to the lack of atmosphere u cant hear sound on the moon. Any scholar, wich btw i am not one, wouldnt mean it literally when they say it'rang like a bell'. It is recorded that when that rocket hit there was siesmic activity that lasted 3 hrs. I will also say that some theories are a little far fetched. U gotta have an open mind tho i have learned that.

I dont have alot of knowledge on the subject either but do have an interest in Astronomy and took a college level class on the subject. I been wondering about hollow moon since I seen the movie Apollo 18. Which isnt about the hollow moon theory but if the movie is correct nasa has been lying about the moon landings and who knows what else. Which isnt far fetch because as this article points out, nasa has given conflicting reports over the years, particularly regarding the moon. One such example of this, is for years nasa has denied that there is water on the moon to recently reporting that there is ice water on the moon especially by the craters. Besides that my question is and I hope somebody can answer this for me. What makes the moon shine? I know the official reason is sun light but if that is true wouldnt that mean the moon is hollow? How can sun light penetrate through dense rock? Im told that stars shine due to their chemical composition so I assume the moon would also have elements that make it shine like stars or is hollow and being illuminated from either the sun or from inside like a light bulb. lolz

When Krakatoa, East of Java, blew a cork, the Earth rang like a bell 7 times... that is shock waves circled the earth 7 times... that makes the earth twice as likely to be a spaceship. Wait a minute, I'm on it!

Lights on the moon are most likely plasma discharge events, since all bodies in the solar system are charged bodies. A study of plasma physics is a great place to start.

I really like holoscience.com It puts together various pieces of knowledge from all the sciences to create a congruent picture of where we are. Logical and reasoned and backed by good science. Start by reading the "synopsis" section, then go back through the archived articles. Very good stuff.

I believe the reason for the secrecy is that our government has made deals with certain ETs that betray the interests of the people. Think blackmail. Our government may want hard technology while the ETs may want soft technology (people) which may involve gross violations of free will. Suppose a race of ET want a continual supply of children as an energy supply and the government agrees to assist, and/or turn a blind eye in exchange for hard tech. Obviously, anything that would eventually point to such a relationship would need to be kept top secret to perpetuate, and could easily be justified by those involved. Even admitting the existence of ETs could eventually (sooner than later) lead to an exposure of such a relationship, hence the apparent nonsensical secrecy.

DAvid's (Feb 22, 2011 above) analysis of von Braun's analysis is bunk. He would have us believe that a rocket scientist is not as qualified as a geologist to read a seismograph and compare it's signature to that of a bell's vibration. He would have us believe that von Braun said they could hear the signature, even though only likened (compared) the signature to something we can hear so the signature on the seismograph could be visualized. I've just debunked David's opinion of himself as a superior debunker.

There's no air in space to transmit audible frequencies, so in space you can't hear DAvid debunk. The fact that the vibrations oscillated for so long doesn't seem strange to him?. I've banged percussion instruments designed to oscillate and can't get a minute out of them, but a big piece of "Rock" vibrates for 3 hours? Nothing weird about that right Dave? There is something very dodgy about the Moon, unless 7 centuries of light phenomena can be explained away as Buzz Aldrin lighting his farts; Mike Collins said if you drop another one of those eye burners in the command module, we'll leave you up here, so to this day he lights them in a vain effort to propel himself back to earth while his Nazi clone runs around the lodge saying pull my finger; Well it's as feasible as getting through the Van Allen belt with a pocket calculator and an Aluminium can in 1969. I'm with Gus, it was an Oldsmobile sucking a lemon; Ennhhh Wise guy huh?. As it is we are asked to trust a guy who had no problem building a rocket and loading it with 3 tons of potassium chlorate and lobbing it into East London; Operation paper clip. what about operation Conglomerate of Psychopaths. BOOOOM there goes Bethnal Green, I didn't feel a thing did you Adolph?. Expecting the truth from people with hobbies like that is an ambitious aspiration. Magic bullets, Kerosene that burns as hot as binary fission,300 years of responsible gun ownership and then we decide some mass shootings would be a good idea in just the last few years? I guess we are going to have to work it out for ourselves because everywhere look there is Buzz's fart gas. When will everyone realise we are being ruled by a coterie of fully fledged psychopaths that somehow manage to organise a war for us every few years? How could we ever get by without them?

I especially like that because the data was analyzed after the original statement as more scientific knowledge was accumulated, that all revised statements/theories must be cover up. Also, a rocket scientist is not as qualified as a geologist to read a seismograph. If they were, they would be geologists.

There isn't much new data bro, because we ain't been back there in over 40 years. About the only new development is that we discovered that it contained way more water than we ever estimated - and that was based on rocks collected from Apollo missions.

It just does NOT make sense why we haven't (supposedly) built a station on the moon just inside the dark side enough to create a 72 degree habitat temperature. Energy could be created by having a pipeline of sorts extend from just inside the cold side to just outside the hot side.

The moon is so close compared to Mars that it' only logical we would build a station on the Moon first....it would be a great leaning experience for the Mars trek. There's GOT to be some reason they're not telling us about not going BACK to the Moon.

Well this is all very interesting.. Makes Star Wars even better.. I have an open mind,i have read the Earth Chronicles,researched tonnes of Articles on Ancient Civilizations,Nibiru and aliens.. I would not put it pass anyone that there are hidden agendas and activities going on in this World.. The Magnetic fields on the moon control the Weather,i have been getting high reading of electro magnetic fields,sometimes You may get ringing in the ears,then we have Tesla's work which is nothing new,the talks of HAARP,the Govt threats with global warming,i mean anything is possible,the Moon could be a refuel station for Flying machines which require electro magnetics to navigate.. so in my conclusion anything is possible.. as for dropping bombs on the Moon? i doubt that.. from the Moon they probably travel to other planets. So i would not argue with anyone's theories here,there is nothing to get angry or upset about.. Everyone has their perspective.. :)

Something real odd i must report is that ever since i have been researching about Nibiru,The Moon is Hollow and Glass Castles i have being logged off by "Google or internet watchmen" and asked to re-enter my password many times along with freezing internet for over 10 seconds..

it is quite possible that the entire solar system was actually created as water globes around a solid iron core and then had a skin 'blown on' with all the overspray being the meteorites we see and their overspray hitting the moon and other solar bodies to make all the shallow craters.Some of the overspray blobs would be quite large and puncture the moon skin to release masses of water to cause the huge shallow pools seen on vraious solar bodies.One thing about moon craters and rays that needs explaining is the extreme length of the main rays around Tycho?Footage of moon landings shows that the astronauts kick loose soil up it only flies a about the same as on earth so how is moon crater impact debris supposed to travel hundreds of miles?