HAVING belatedly ratified Lance Armstrong's drug ban and the stripping of his Tour de France titles, cycling's global governing body has been asked to accept some of the responsibility for the crisis.

The International Cycling Union (UCI) yesterday ratified the sanctions recommended by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), who concluded that Armstrong and his United States Postal Service team ran "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme that sport has ever seen".

The UCI management committee will now meet on Friday to discuss the "exact sporting consequences" of the decision, including whether the titles and prize money will be re-distributed.

But today World Anti-Doping Agency chief John Fahey claimed the sport will only regain credibility when the senior officials on watch take responsibility for the scandal.

"I look forward to seeing what they (the UCI) propose to do for the future to ensure what we've seen through this Armstrong debacle doesn't happen again.

"They clearly have to take the blinkers off, look at the past, examine the people who are there, ask themselves the questions: 'are those same people still in the sport and can they proceed forward with those people remaining?'.

"I don't think there's any credibility if they don't do that and I think they need to get confidence back into the sport so that its millions of supporters around the world will watch and support the sport going forward."

UCI president Pat McQuaid, who has held the position since 2006, rejected calls for his resignation yesterday over perceived failures by the world governing body over the Armstrong affair, instead insisting cycling has a positive future and "Lance Armstrong has no place in cycling".

McQuaid was forced to insist the UCI has "nothing to hide", despite a donation of more than £62,000 made by Armstrong in 2002, denying it was connected to any cover-up of a positive test.

Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his seven titles (Image: AFP)

"UCI has nothing to hide in responding to the USADA report," McQuaid added.

"Don't try to make the connection between the suspicious test and the donation. There were no positive tests from him.

"There is no connection between the donation given to the UCI and a test being covered up because there was no test covered up.

"It's certainly not a resignation issue. It would be better if we hadn't done it, and if we were to do it in the future, we would do it in a different way."

Meanwhile, Tour de France director Christian Prudhomme has stated that the race must not have a victor in the Armstrong years.

Prudhomme said: "The formal decision has to be taken by the UCI but for us, we must have a clean record. This period must be marked by the absence of winners.

"The UCI rules are clear. When a rider is disqualified, he must pay the prize money back."

Meanwhile, Armstrong has been asked to repay a disputed bonus payment.

The 41-year-old received a bonus of five million US dollars after a legal battle with SCA Promotions, who had declined to pay the sum in the belief the American had doped to win his seven Tour titles.

Jeff Tillotson, lawyer for SCA Promotions, told Press Association Sport: "It is inappropriate and improper for him to keep those bonus amounts and we will be demanding them back and pursuing appropriate legal action if he does not return them."

The International Olympic Committee will await Friday's UCI meeting and further information before a decision is made on the bronze medal Armstrong won in Sydney in 2000.

Armstrong, who battled back from cancer to return to professional cycling, has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and refused to co-operate with the USADA investigation.

He cuts an increasingly isolated figure as Oakley became the latest sponsor to withdraw their backing.

Armstrong today removed '7-time Tour de France champion' from his Twitter profile in his first response to being stripped of his seven titles for doping offences.