In three short paragraphs, Stephen Corry, Director of Survival International illustrates the dangers of REDD to Indigenous Peoples. His letter, published today in the Boston Globe was in response to an article by Mark Dowie adapted from his book “Conservation Refugees: The Hundred Year Conflict Between Global Conservation and Native People.”

Dowie’s conclusion is clear:

As cultural ecologist Gene Anderson observed, many of the world’s traditional societies long ago came to “some kind of terms with their environment, or they would not have lasted long enough to become ‘traditional.’ ” They are, in the language of ecology, living sustainably. And it seems self-evident now that the only way global conservation is going to succeed in its mission of preserving wild places and biodiversity is to end the counterproductive practice of evicting these proven land stewards from their homelands, and instead work together with them in developing sustainable ways of living.

TRIBAL PEOPLES’ land has often been stolen for game reserves and national parks, creating so-called conservation refugees, as Mark Dowie’s “No natives allowed” highlights. But while conservation organizations may be slowly waking up to the need to recognize tribal peoples’ rights to their land, the global scramble to act on climate change is leading other, more powerful, institutions to stake their own claims over tribal peoples’ forests.

Governments, together with the UN, are currently hammering out schemes to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation, or REDD. Under the REDD system, countries with rain forests will be paid by other countries to keep trees standing. But these forests are often home to tribal peoples, who have no say in the debate.

The best way to protect the rain forest is to protect the rights of the people who live in it and from it. More than 400 million acres of Amazon rain forest have been recognized as indigenous territories, and are secured against deforestation. Unless the world’s governments accept that tribal peoples have rights over their territories, and must be at the center of decisions about them, they risk creating a new generation of climate change refugees, forsaking the very people most at risk from global warming.

Published

REDDisms:

“I don’t know anybody who believes that the price of carbon over the next five, 10, 15, 20 years is going to go down. It’s going to go up. And if you’re talking about investing in capital goods with lifetimes of that period or more, it’s the future you should be thinking about, not just today.”

— Henry Derwent, CEO of the International Emissions Trading Association, March 2008

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email