Best Practices for Writing R Code

Overview

Understand the importance about requirements and dependencies for your code.

Know when to use setwd().

To identify and segregate distinct components in your code using # or #-.

Additional best practice recommendations.

Keep track of who wrote your code and its intended purpose

Starting your code with an annotated description of what the code does when it is run will help you when you have to look at or change it in the future. Just one or two lines at the beginning of the file can save you or someone else a lot of time and effort when trying to understand what a particular script does.

# This is code to replicate the analyses and figures from my 2014 Science# paper. Code developed by Sarah Supp, Tracy Teal, and Jon Borelli

Be explicit about the requirements and dependencies of your code

Loading all of the packages that will be necessary to run your code (using library) is a nice way of indicating which packages are necessary to run your code. It can be frustrating to make it two-thirds of the way through a long-running script only to find out that a dependency hasn’t been installed.

library(ggplot2)library(reshape)library(vegan)

Another way you can be explicit about the requirements of your code and improve it’s reproducibility is to limit the “hard-coding” of the input and output files for your script. If your code will read in data from a file, define a variable early in your code that stores the path to that file. For example

input_file<-"data/data.csv"output_file<-"data/results.csv"# read inputinput_data<-read.csv(input_file)# get number of samples in datasample_number<-nrow(input_data)# generate resultsresults<-some_other_function(input_file,sample_number)# write resultswrite.table(results,output_file)

is preferable to

# checkinput_data<-read.csv("data/data.csv")# get number of samples in datasample_number<-nrow(input_data)# generate resultsresults<-some_other_function("data/data.csv",sample_number)# write resultswrite.table("data/results.csv",output_file)

It is also worth considering what the working directory is. If the working directory must change, it is best to do that at the beginning of the script.

Be careful when using setwd()

One should exercise caution when using setwd(). Changing directories in a script file can limit reproducibility:

setwd() will return an error if the directory to which you’re trying to change doesn’t exist or if the user doesn’t have the correct permissions to access that directory. This becomes a problem when sharing scripts between users who have organized their directories differently.

If/when your script terminates with an error, you might leave the user in a different directory than the one they started in, and if they then call the script again, this will cause further problems. If you must use setwd(), it is best to put it at the top of the script to avoid these problems.
The following error message indicates that R has failed to set the working directory you specified:

It is best practice to have the user running the script begin in a consistent directory on their machine and then use relative file paths from that directory to access files (see below).

Identify and segregate distinct components in your code

It’s easy to annotate and mark your code using # or #- to set off sections of your code and to make finding specific parts of your code easier. For example, it’s often helpful when writing code to separate the function definitions. If you create only one or a few custom functions in your script, put them toward the top of your code. If you have written many functions, put them all in their own .R file and then source those files. source will define all of these functions so that your code can make use of them as needed.

source("my_genius_fxns.R")

Other ideas

Use a consistent style within your code. For example, name all matrices something ending in _mat. Consistency makes code easier to read and problems easier to spot.

Keep your code in bite-sized chunks. If a single function or loop gets too long, consider looking for ways to break it into smaller pieces.

Don’t repeat yourself–automate! If you are repeating the same code over and over, use a loop or a function to repeat that code for you. Needless repetition doesn’t just waste time–it also increases the likelihood you’ll make a costly mistake!

Keep all of your source files for a project in the same directory, then use relative paths as necessary to access them. For example, use

R can run into memory issues. It is a common problem to run out of memory after running R scripts for a long time. To inspect the objects in your current R environment, you can list the objects, search current packages, and remove objects that are currently not in use. A good practice when running long lines of computationally intensive code is to remove temporary objects after they have served their purpose. However, sometimes, R will not clean up unused memory for a while after you delete objects. You can force R to tidy up its memory by using gc().

# Sample dataset of 1000 rowsinterim_object<-data.frame(rep(1:100,10),rep(101:200,10),rep(201:300,10))object.size(interim_object)# Reports the memory size allocated to the objectrm("interim_object")# Removes only the object itself and not necessarily the memory allotted to itgc()# Force R to release memory it is no longer usingls()# Lists all the objects in your current workspacerm(list=ls())# If you want to delete all the objects in the workspace and start with a clean slate

Don’t save a session history (the default option in R, when it asks if you want an RData file). Instead, start in a clean environment so that older objects don’t remain in your environment any longer than they need to. If that happens, it can lead to unexpected results.

Wherever possible, keep track of sessionInfo() somewhere in your project folder. Session information is invaluable because it captures all of the packages used in the current project. If a newer version of a package changes the way a function behaves, you can always go back and reinstall the version that worked (Note: At least on CRAN, all older versions of packages are permanently archived).

Collaborate. Grab a buddy and practice “code review”. Review is used for preparing experiments and manuscripts; why not use it for code as well? Our code is also a major scientific achievement and the product of lots of hard work!

Best Practice

What are some specific ways we could restructure the code we worked on today to make it easier for a new user to read? Discuss with your neighbor.

Make two new R scripts called inflammation.R and inflammation_fxns.R.
Copy and paste code into each script so that inflammation.R “does stuff” and inflammation_fxns.R holds all of your functions.
Hint: you will need to add source to one of the files.