Can?t be it, the range to the wall was close enough by far, at least for BR standards. I?m pretty sure on this, because I spam the living hell out of qcb+2 at the wall, lol.
SS~qcb+2, mix-up with lows, after frame advantage, etc.

we have the same build as the sweden one and i'll have a look tonight.

Signature

Bruck him for souf east, blud

look man the move doesnt track sidestep, but if you sidestep it will hit you
steves b+1 isint safe because it only auto guards high and mid, but you can cancel it and block all lows
Jaycees u/f+4,3 is launch punishable on block but if you try to punish it the 1 follow-up will hit you

At 0:37, was Paul's standing 4 punished by Craig's 1.2? If so, then that sucks. The Paul player in the video wasn't that impressive, but still I really hope this thing is false. CH Standing 4 was an awesome poke launch to spam near walls.

At 0:37, was Paul's standing 4 punished by Craig's 1.2? If so, then that sucks. The Paul player in the video wasn't that impressive, but still I really hope this thing is false. CH Standing 4 was an awesome poke launch to spam near walls.

FUUUUCK!!!!! It was an awesome poke launch everywhere, not just near walls.

Ina still has it at -4, but I believe they just took BR frame data and keep updating it whenever they find something out, so that might very well be wrong. And that looks damn near guaranteed, I watched it a couple of times now, if I'm not totally wrong Paul has not pulled his leg back fully when that Marduk 1,d+2 hits.

OGRE: Good shit. Seems like they took out Paul's FUFT b+3+4 into guaranteed jab launch if the opponent blocks the spring attack. This one is not a big deal however, usually everybody sidesteps that shit.