A Vietnam veteran, Jeff Gates is a widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union leaders worldwide. He served for seven years as counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance.

Sayanim: Israeli Operatives in the U.S.

Sayanim — Israeli Operatives in the U.S.

Americans know that something fundamental is amiss. They sense—rightly—that they are being misled no matter which political party does the leading.

A long misinformed public lacks the tools to grasp how they are being deceived. Without those tools, Americans will continue to be frustrated at being played for the fool.

When the “con” is clearly seen, “the mark” (that’s us) will see that all roads lead to the same duplicitous source: Israel and its operatives. The secret to Israel’s force-multiplier in the U.S. is its use of agents, assets and sayanim (Hebrew for volunteers).

When Israeli-American Jonathan Pollard was arrested for spying in 1986, Tel Aviv assured us that he was not an Israeli agent but part of a “rogue” operation. That was a lie.

Only 12 years later did Tel Aviv concede that he was an Israeli spy the entire time he was stealing U.S. military secrets. That espionage—by a purported ally—damaged our national security more than any operation in U.S. history.

From 1981-1985, this U.S. Navy intelligence analyst provided Israel with 360 cubic feet of classified military documents on Soviet arms shipments, Pakistani nuclear weapons, Libyan air defense systems and other intelligence sought by Tel Aviv to advance its geopolitical agenda.

Agentsdiffer from assets and sayanim. Agentspossess the requisite mental state to be convicted of treason, a capital crime. Under U.S. law, that internal state is what distinguishes premeditated murder from a lesser crime such as involuntary manslaughter. Though there’s a death in either case, the legal liabilities are different—for a reason.

Intent is the factor that determines personal culpability. That distinction traces its roots to a widely shared belief in free will as a key component that distinguishes humans from animals.

Agents operate with premeditation and “extreme malice” or what the law describes as an “evil mind.” Though that describes the mental state of Jonathan Pollard, Israeli leaders assured us otherwise—another example of an evil mind as the U.S. was played for the fool.

Played for the Fool, Again

Pollard took from his office more than one million documents for copying by his Israeli handler. When those classified materials were transferred to the Soviets, reportedly in exchange for the emigration of Russian Jews, this spy operation shifted the entire dynamics of the Cold War.

To put a price tag on this espionage, imagine $20 trillion in U.S. Cold War defense outlays from 1948-1989 (in 2010 dollars). The bulk of that investment in national security was negated by a spy working for a nation that pretended throughout to be a U.S. ally.

Pollard was sentenced to life in prison. Israel suffered no consequences. None. Zero. Nada. Not then. Not now. Then as now, we were played for the fool.

At trial, Pollard claimed he wasn’t stealing from the U.S.; he was stealing secrets for Israel—with whom the U.S. has long had a “special relationship.” He thought we should have shared our military secrets with them. That’s chutzpah. That also confirms we were played for the fool.

Looking back, it’s easy to see how seamlessly we segued from a global Cold War to a global War on Terrorism. In retrospect, the false intelligence used to induce our invasion of Iraq was traceable to Israelis, pro-Israelis or Israeli assets such as John McCain (see below).

Even while in prison, Pollard’s iconic status among Israelis played a strategic role. Was it just coincidence that Tel Aviv announced a $1 million grant to their master spy less than two weeks before 911? Is that how Israel signaled its operatives in the U.S.?

Absent that provocation, would we now find ourselves at war in the Middle East? Surely no one still believes that America’s interests are being advanced in a quagmire that has now become the longest war in U.S. history.

“I know what America is,” Benjamin Netanyahu told a group of Israelis in 2001, apparently not knowing his words were being recorded. “America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction.”

With oversight by Israeli case officers (katsas), Israeli operations proceed in the U.S. by using agents, assets and volunteers (sayanim). Let’s take a closer look at each.

The Sayanim System

Sayanim (singular sayan) are shielded from conventional legal culpability by being told only enough to perform their narrow role. Though their help may be essential to the success of an Israeli operation, these volunteers (sayanim also means helpers) could pass a polygraph test because their recruiters ensure they remain ignorant of the overall goals of an operation.

In other words, a sayan can operate as an accomplice but still not be legally liable due to a lack of the requisite intent regarding the broader goals—of which they are purposely kept ignorant. Does that intentional “ignorance” absolve them of liability under U.S. law? So far, yes.

Much like military reservists, sayanim are activated when needed to support an operation. By agreeing to be available to help Israel, they provide an on-call undercover corps and force-multiplier that can be deployed on short notice.

How are sayanim called to action? To date, there’s been no attempt by U.S. officials to clarify that key point. This may explain why Pollard was again in the news on July 13th with a high-profile Israeli commemoration of his 9000th day of incarceration.

To show solidarity with this Israeli-American traitor, the lights encircling Jerusalem were darkened while an appeal was projected onto the walls of the Old City urging that President Obama order Pollard’s release from federal prison.

Pollard has long been a rallying point for Jewish nationalists, Zionist extremists and ultra-orthodox ideologues. In short, just the sort of people who would be likely recruits as sayanim. The news coverage given this Day of Adoration may help explain how Israel signals its helpers that an operation is underway and in need of their help.

Are pro-Israelis once again playing Americans for the fool?

When not aiding an ongoing operation, sayanim gather and report intelligence useful to Israel. This volunteer corps is deeply imbedded in legislative bodies, particularly in the U.S.

Thus far, this Israeli operation has advanced with legal impunity as the Israel lobby—though acting as a foreign agent—continues even now to pose as a “domestic” operation.

Morris Amitay, former executive director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, explains how this invisible cadre aids the Israel lobby in advancing its geopolitical agenda:

“There are a lot of guys at the working level up here [on Capitol Hill]…who happen to be Jewish, who are willing…to look at certain issues in terms of their Jewishness…These are all guys who are in a position to make the decision in these areas for those senators…You can get an awful lot done just at the staff level.”

What sayanim are not told by their katsas is that an Israeli operation may endanger not only Israel but also the broader Jewish community when these operations are linked to extremism, terrorism, organized crime, espionage and treason. Though sayanim “must be 100 percent Jewish,” Ostrovsky reports inBy Way of Deception (1990):

“…the Mossad does not seem to care how devastating it could be to the status of the Jewish people in the Diaspora if it was known. The answer you get if you ask is: “So what’s the worst that could happen to those Jews? They’d all come to Israel. Great!” [Mossad is the intelligence and foreign operations directorate for Israel.]

Assets, Agents and Sayanim

Assets are people profiled in sufficient depth that they can be relied upon to perform consistent with their profile. Such people typically lack the state of mind required for criminal culpability because they lack the requisite intent to commit a crime.

Nevertheless, assets are critical to the success of Israeli operations in the U.S. They help simply by pursuing their profiled personal needs—typically for recognition, influence, money, sex, drugs or the greatest drug of all: ideology.

Thus the mission-critical task fulfilled by political assets that the Israel lobby “produces” for long-term service in the Congress—while appearing to represent their U.S. constituents.

Put a profiled asset in a pre-staged time, place and circumstance—over which the Israel lobby can exert considerable influence—and Israeli psy-ops specialists can be confident that, within an acceptable range of probabilities, an asset will act consistent with his or her profile.

Democrat or Republican is irrelevant; the strategic point remains the same: to ensure that lawmakers perform consistent with Israel’s interests. With the help of McCain-Feingold campaign finance “reform,” the Israel lobby attained virtual control over the U.S. Congress.

The performance of assets in the political sphere can be anticipated with sufficient confidence that outcomes become foreseeable—within an acceptable range of probabilities. How difficult was it to predict the outcome when Bill Clinton, a classic asset, encountered White House intern Monica Lewinsky?

Senator John McCain has long been a predictable asset. His political career traces its origins to organized crime from the 1920s. It was organized crime that first drew him to Arizona to run for Congress four years before the 1986 retirement of Senator Barry Goldwater.

By marketing his “brand” as a Vietnam-era prisoner of war, he became a reliable spokesman for Tel Aviv while being portrayed as a “war hero.” No media outlet dares mention that Colonel Ted Guy, McCain’s commanding officer while a POW, sought his indictment for treason for his many broadcasts for the North Vietnamese that assured the death of many U.S. airmen.

As a typical asset, it came as no surprise to see McCain and Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, a self-professed Zionist, used to market the phony intelligence that took us to war in Iraq. McCain’s ongoing alliance with transnational organized crime spans three decades.

His 1980’s advocacy for S&L crook Charles Keating of “The Keating 5” finds a counterpart in his recent meetings with Russian-Israeli mobster Oleg Deripaska who at age 40 held $40 billion in wealth defrauded from his fellow Russians.

McCain conceded earlier this month in a town hall meeting in Tempe, Arizona that he met in a small dinner in Switzerland with mega-thief Deripaska and Lord Rothschild V.

For assets such as McCain to be indicted for treason, the American public must grasp the critical role that such pliable personalities play in political manipulations. McCain is a “poster boy” for how assets are deployed to shape decisions such as those that took our military to war. In the Information Age, if that’s not treason, what is?

The predictability of a politician’s conduct confirms his or her qualifications as an asset. They are routinely developed and “produced” over lengthy periods of time and then—as with John McCain—maintained in key positions to influence decision-making as key junctures.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was candid in his assessment four weeks after 911. He may have been thinking about John McCain when he made this revealing comment:

“I want to tell you something very clear, don’t worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it.” [October 3, 2001]

Indictments for Treason

Are assets culpable? Do they have the requisite intent to indict them for treason? Does John McCain possess an evil mind? Did he betray this nation of his own free will or is he typical of those assets with personalities so weak and malleable that they can easily be manipulated?

As federal grand juries are impaneled to identify and indict participants in this trans-generational operation, how many sayanim should the Federal Bureau of Investigation expect to uncover in the U.S.? No one knows because this subtle form of treason is not yet well understood.

Victor Ostrovksy, a former Mossad katsa (case officer) wrote in 1990 that the Mossad had 7,000 sayanim in London alone. In London’s 1990 population of 6.8 million, Israel’s all-volunteer corps represented one-tenth of one percent of the residents of that capital city.

If Washington, DC is ten times more critical to Israel’s geopolitical goals (an understatement), does that mean the FBI should expect to find ten times more sayanim per capita in Washington?

No one knows. And Tel Aviv is unlikely to volunteer the information. This we know for certain: America has been played for the fool. And so has our military.

This duplicity dates back well before British Foreign Secretary Alfred Balfour wrote to an earlier Lord Rothschild in 1917 citing UK approval for a “Jewish homeland.” In practical effect, that “homeland” now ensures non-extradition for senior operatives in transnational organized crime.

Making this treason transparent is essential to restore U.S. national security. That transparency may initially appear unfair to the many moderate and secular Jews who join others appalled at this systemic corruption of the U.S. political system.

Yet they are also concerned that somehow they may be portrayed as guilty by association due to a shared faith tradition. That would be not only unjust to them but also ineffective in identifying and indicting those complicit.

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by Jeff Gates
on July 19, 2010,
With 9195 Reads
Filed under Foreign Policy.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

69 Responses to "Sayanim: Israeli Operatives in the U.S."

Archibald Titus September 1, 2010 at 4:01 am

Don’t forget that controlling comment areas of news sites is part of controlling the press:

The Israeli Foreign Ministry set up a internet alert program to notify thousands of Jews across the world whenever a major website posts an article about Israel, so they can jump in and dominate the discussions.

To further hurt BP, the US blames BP for the release of the innocent Megrahi.

Reportedly, the evidence in the Lockerbie trial was faked to cover up ‘alleged’ CIA drug smuggling involving Monzer al Kassar.

The drug smuggling was to have been revealed by Major Charles McKee and his team who were travelling on PanAm 103 with their evidence.

The oil spill story may have been exaggerated?

Around 750 boats drafted in to scoop up oil from the Gulf of Mexico are having ‘trouble’ finding any crude in the sea, a top US official has said.

“We are starting to have trouble finding oil,” US pointman Admiral Thad Allen, who is in charge of handling the government’s response, told reporters.

The boats are “really having to search for the oil in some cases” around the area of the capped well, he added. (AFP: Gulf boats having trouble finding any oil: US official)

(Thanks to Dublin Mick for the link)

The USA is angry that BP is to drill for oil off the coast of Libya. (BP to begin deep-water drilling off coast of Libya)

If Exxon takes over BP, Exxon gets more oil, including that off the coast of Libya.
In 1975, the CIA’s Philip Agee testified that he had conducted personal name checks of employees for a subsidiary of what is now Exxon.

Exxon was “letting the CIA assist in employment decisions, and my guess is that those name checks…are continuing to this day.” (Philip Agee – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

The reason that the oil could not be seen was because of all of the toxic chemicals used to get rid of what was on the surface of the water. The chemicals destroyed the oil on the surface but there would have been millions of gallons under the water.

Even the British Gov admitted it let off the guy jailed for the Lockerbie bombing because BP asked them to. No doubt it was part of a deal with Libya.

China has been cuddling up to Libya for years which is why Britain did the deal.

And yes the guy convicted of the Lockerbie bombing was probably just a patsy. It was a good excuse for sanction against Libya to take their nukes off them.

BP will not get taken over, it is sellng a few oil fields and getting more investors but it will survive.

Alexandr Solzhenitsyn had this to say of the Soviet system which was deemed worthy of recognition as one of ‘our’ Allies fighting for ‘Democracy’, ‘against the Dictators’ in WW2:

“This was a system which, in time of peace, artificially created a famine causing SIX MILLION PERSONS to die in the Ukraine between 1932 and 1933. SIX MILLION PERSONS!”
(Alexander Solzhenitsyn Speaks to the West (1978) p16)

FDRoosevelt’s ally Stalin was the supreme dictator of Russia for almost a quarter of a century, 1929-1953.

Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan (1928-32) sought the ‘collectivization of agriculture’ through the ‘abolition of property in land’ put forward in (Jewish) Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto. Before the Revolution millions of independent peasant farmers, or kulaks, had their own individual plots.

When Communism was imposed on Russia, the kulaks as private property owners stood in the way. In 1929 Stalin called for their ‘liquidation’, and their small family farms, animals, implements and crops were declared to belong to the state.

“The (Jewish) communist leaders Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had always argued that the peasant would never surrender enough food voluntarily, and must be coerced and, if need be, crushed” (*Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World p268).

The Red Army and GPU were used to implement the policy. Many thousands of peasants who resisted were killed or sent to the frozen north or the desert steppes. Rather than give up their animals to the collective farms, the peasants killed and ate them. As a result, the number of farm animals in the Soviet Union was catastrophically reduced.

The peasants stopped farming on ground that suddenly no longer belonged to them. Food production declined drastically and cities started running out of food. Orders were given for grain to be confiscated from the peasants, whether they had sufficient for themselves and their families or not. Those caught trying to reserve food for their families were ‘severely dealt with’. By the winter of 1932-3, virtually no food was left in the countryside. By early March 1933, ‘death on a mass scale really began’ (R Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow (1986) p243). The main farming areas of Russia, in the regions of the Ukraine and North Caucasus, were devastated. Millions of people were forced to eat anything that was available. It was a time of terrible hunger, a catastrophic famine.

Eugene Lyons was sent to Russia in 1928 as chief correspondent for United Press. He described the famine in his book Assignment in Utopia (1937):

“Hell broke loose in seventy thousand Russian villages.. A population as large as all of Switzerland’s or Denmark’s was stripped clean of all their belongings.. They were herded with bayonets at railroad stations, packed indiscriminately into cattle and freight cars and dumped weeks later in the lumber regions of the frozen North, the deserts of central Asia, wherever labor was needed, there to live or die..”. The famine alone is estimated conservatively to have been responsible for 6 million deaths, almost half of them children (Conquest, p 303-4). Other millions died from the killings and sickness as a result of the deportations (*p 304-7).

Lyons, himself Jewish, credits the Jewish commissar Lazar Kaganovich with the major portion of responsibility for this major crime against humanity:

“Lazar Kaganovich… it was his mind that invented the Political Departments to lead collectivized agriculture, his iron hand that applied Bolshevik mercilessness.” (*Lyons, p 578). The Encycl. Brit. says tersely, “(Kaganovich) was one of the small group of Stalin’s top advisors pushing for very high rates of collectivization after 1929.. Within the Politburo, Kaganovich.. led the opposition to Kirov’s proposed concessions to the peasantry and to his attempts to relax the harshness of Stalin’s control..”

Kaganovich died at the ripe old age of 98 in 1991 – ethnically safe from pursuit by the Israeli secret service, the Simon Wiesenthal organization and the New York media-intelligentsia.

In your Oct. 9 article on Elie Wiesel, the American icon of Holocaust survivors, he is paid a special tribute as a “speaker of truth.” This is the same Elie Wiesel who is continually referred to by Noam Chomsky and others as “a terrible fraud.” What can explain such disparity of opinion?

Perhaps it is because Wiesel, who has written literally volumes Against Silence, remains silent when it comes to such issues involving Palestinians as land expropriation, torture and abrogation of basic human rights.

Perhaps it is because Elie Wiesel proclaims with great piety that “the opposite of love is not hate; it is indifference,” while he remains totally indifferent to the inequality and suffering of the Palestinians. Perhaps it is because he enjoys recognition as “one of the first opponents of apartheid” in South Africa, while he remains totally silent and indifferent to the apartheid being practiced today in Israel.

Perhaps it is because he decries terrorism, yet never apologizes for the terrorism perpetrated by the Irgun at Deir Yassin on April 9, 1948. He refuses even to comment on it. He dismisses this act of terrorism in eight short words in his memoirs, All Rivers Run to the Sea. He remembers the Jewish victims at Kielce, Poland (July 1946) with great anguish, but ignores twice as many Palestinian victims of his own employer at Deir Yassin. The irony is breathtaking.

It is even more shocking that the world’s best known Holocaust survivor can repeatedly visit Yad Vashem and yet keep silent about the victims of Deir Yassin who lie within his sight 1,400 meters to the north. He bitterly protests when Jewish graves are defaced, but has nothing to say when the cemetery of Deir Yassin is bulldozed. He refuses even to acknowledge repeated requests that he join a group of Jews and non-Jews who wish to build a memorial at Deir Yassin.

Elie Wiesel may profess modesty and claim he is “not a symbol of anything” but, unfortunately, he has become a symbol of hypocrisy.

Arthur Butz MSc (MIT), PhD (Minnesota), professor of electrical engineering and computer science at Northwestern University in Illinois, wrote a groundbreaking technical and historical analysis and refutation in his book The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (1977).

He gives a wonderful example of the seemingly endless contradictions and ironies evident throughout the entire ‘official’ historiography of the Holocaust.

He quotes Martin Gilbert’s ‘long and copiously annotated study’ Auschwitz and the Allies:

‘Between May 1942 and June 1944, almost none of the messages reaching the west had referred to Auschwitz as the destination of Jewish deportees, or as a killing centre. Nor had the name of Auschwitz made any impression on those who were building up what they believed to be an increasingly comprehensive picture of the fate of the Jews.’ (p 340).

He compares this with the contention of Walter Lacquer in his ‘shorter but also copiously annotated study’ called The Terrible Secret (1980). Lacquer explains that mass exterminations at Auschwitz could not have been concealed, noting that Auschwitz was a ‘veritable archipelago’, that ‘Auschwitz inmates.. were, in fact, dispersed all over Silesia, and.. met with thousands of people’, that ‘hundreds of civilian employees .. worked at Auschwitz’, and that ‘journalists travelled in the General Government [German-controlled Poland] and were bound to hear’, etc. (Lacquer p22-25).

Butz says, ‘I have no quarrel with such observations, as I have made them myself, and on the basis of essentially the same considerations [Butz (1977) pp87f, 92ff].. ..Now the reader of Gilbert, Lacquer and Butz can make a very simple determination. He is being told that (a) in the period May 1942 to June 1944, those interested in such matters had no information of mass gassings at Auschwitz and (b) mass exterminations at Auschwitz could not have been concealed from the world for any significant length of time. The reader.. should assume both claims to be true: There was no information of mass gassings at Auschwitz during the relevant period, and mass gassings could not have been kept secret. Therefore, there were no mass exterminations at Auschwitz.’ (Butz, Context and Perspective in the ‘Holocaust’ Controversy, in the Journal of Historical Review Winter 1982 pp385-386.).

I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.
In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

Absolutely correct Jameson, neither Eisenhower, de Gaulle, nor Churcill mention in their memoirs any gas chamber-crematorium or even the word “holocaust”. The same applies for the International Red Cross.

Jameson July 21, 2010 at 11:38 am

Elie Wiesel vs Encyclopaedia Britannica

Wiesel has been one of the most prominent spokesman for the very sizeable group of people known as Holocaust survivors. Wiesel has chaired the US Holocaust Memorial Council and has been the recipient of a Congressional Gold Medal and Nobel Peace Prize..

Time Magazine, March 18 1985:

‘How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? “I will never know” Wiesel says. “I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”

Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under ‘Buchenwald’:

“In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions.”

Jameson is posting some serious & accurate
historical information.
One of the most or the most important reason to study history
is so you do not repeat it !!!!!!
It would be so wrong for America to have to suffer
a similar fate. We have historical records and can so easily
share the information.
Germans suffered terribly
A.I.P.A.C. OF LUNATICS / A.I.P.A.C. OF LUNATICS
THE ROYALS ARE LUNATICS AS WELL
(Royals now have NGO’s,Corporations,Trusts,Institutions,etc.
OH ,DID I SAY BANKS ?? 🙂 🙂

Jameson says:
July 21, 2010 at 11:31 am
The Hidden but Awkward Origins of World War 2

The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events:

Just consider the following:

Jameson July 21, 2010 at 11:31 am

The Hidden but Awkward Origins of World War 2

The unexpected views of four key diplomats who were close to events:

Just consider the following:

Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).

Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)

Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).

Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

Is all of this merely attributable to terrible antisemitism?

The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):

‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’

Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their “race”.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.

Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’

Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).

Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word “Jew”, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).

G-d help us,
is there anybody on this planet
that did not roll their eyes at this one ?????
incredible,

PEOPLE I AM EXTREMELY QUALIFIED TO BE
SECRETARY OF STATE,
I PLEDGE THAT WHEN I LIE TO YOU AS SECRETARY OF STATE I WILL
HAVE THE COURTESY TO MAKE THE LIE AT LEAST KINDA/SORTA BELIEVABLE
AFTER A FEW DRINKS , 🙂 , OKAY ?
we are all freaking doomed 🙂
words fail me , how will we explain to the children how
we let the utterly Mad run the Country ??? 🙂

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks about the fight against terrorism on the Pakistan/Afghani border. Clinton says “I assume somebody in this [Pakistani] government, from top to bottom, does know where Bin Laden is, and I’d like to know too.”

DO YOU BELIEVE THIS ???
I mean come on , time for some fresh material ,
FOOL ME ONCE ,SHAME ON YOU
FOOL ME TWICE ,SHAME ON ME
LIE TO US 15000 TIMES WITH THE SAME DRIVEL , GET SOME NEW WRITERS,please,
THE WHOLE WORLD IS LAUGHING AT US, AGAIN,STILL.
IS THIS MONTY PYTHON ????

(continued) Stalin, Trosky were Jews. Steady contacts were kept between the Jewery in the USA ‘n the communist Jewery in the Kremlin-DUMA, among others through Armand Hammer, Oxxy Petrolium, as related in his book: “Witness to History”. Right now, the Zion Talmudic Mafia (FED-Wall Street-London-Tel Aviv) agents-representatives are flirting with ‘n consolidating their positions in India-China… just in case the US people gets angry about how bad it has been deceived by the enemy within,ready to move SHOP.

The Mossad’s Infiltration Of America.
THE MOSSAD PRIDES ITSELF ON DEEP infiltration & penetration into every
‘Muslim’ militant group in the world. Thus any media-hyped ‘terrorist’ attack reported by the Jewish occupied press is doubtless a Mossad operation.

All of the Mossad-engineered ‘terrorist’ attacks benefit the Jews since it galvanizes the Western world into making Israel’s enemies their own – and gives Israel a free hand in dealing with the Palestinians who are looked upon as enemies of the world.

The infiltration of the Mossad into the US political & military infrastructure had its greatest impetus in the 1980’s during the Reagan & Bush Sr administrations. 3 Zionist Jews with close ties to the Mossad held influential offices in the Pentagon during this period:http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=337

Judaism is neither a race or a religion, it is Xenophobic Tribalism.
XENOPHOBIC: n.
A person unduly fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or foreign peoples.
TRIBALISM: n.
1. The organization, culture, or beliefs of a tribe.
2. A strong feeling of identity with and loyalty to one’s tribe or group.

Jonathan Pollard was a terrible spy; he drew attention to himself with his rude and disruptive behavior at work. It is notoriously difficult to fire federal employees UNLESS they abuse classified information. In desperation to be rid of a horrible employee, Pollard’s boss decided to investigate him for any such violations. The rest is history. Had Pollard been a polite and helpful employee he would still be spying today, probably from a much higher position. Most agree Pollard is far from a genius. If HE could get such a job then most Israel-first believers could get equal or better ones. No doubt many have. Does anyone suppose Israel has not found drugs and techniques to pass polygraph examinations?
My conclusion: we must assume there are thousands of spies better than Pollard in every position Israel wants to spy on. We must assume our presidents are subject to blackmail and extortion. Indeed, we must assume our country is subject to nuclear extortion. We must assume that it is NOT POSSIBLE for our president or senior military officers to oppose the will of Israel, even in the unlikely event they wanted to do so. We must assume Israel could take control of our military. We must assume Israel could attack American cities or military targets with nuclear weapons and suffer no consequences.
Suppose for a moment that some of these speculations are correct. Doesn’t our present situation suddenly make more sense? Consider President Obama’s promise to leave Iraq. That promise was not merely broken, as are most campaign promises. It was FORGOTTEN by friend and foe, Dem and Repub, liberal and conservative. His friends did not complain nor did his enemies gloat. The promise simply NEVER HAPPENED; it went down George Orwell’s “memory hole”.
Israeli leaders and public figures routinely express contempt for Americans generally and for President Obama in particular. They violate diplomatic niceties in ways calculated to humiliate American leaders. One of their professors, Martin van Creveld, has spoken freely about lashing out at the world with nuclear weapons if the world fails to protect Israel from any (very unlikely) threat that Israel cannot handle. If van Creveld represents the “tip of the iceberg” then we are far from free. If I am right, we have actually been very fortunate so far.
What to do? Let’s start by thinking about it.

President Jimmy Carter said that Israel has 400 known nuclear weapons and I would add to that the 1,000 that have been acknowledged missing from the former Soviet Union. This coupled with unlimited financial resources and a widely dispersed network of spies makes this small paranoid state, surrounded by enemies, with a long and tortured history of persecution and a population that believes they are ‘Gods Chosen People”, a nightmare for all the world’s people. I wold say, they probably have pre-positioned nuclear bombs in every major country. We are all in terrible danger.

This sure is a sophisticated site. I am impressed with the article and the attendent commentary

I would only add that the book THE CONTROVERSY OF ZION, available as PDF on the web, is a wonderful history of much of what is being discussed here. It is full of astounding detail. All of you here who have not yet done so, should make sure to put this under your cap.

To S. Langdon: excellent wrap up of the Zion-Talmudic Mafia macro structure in GB-USA, regarding who pulls the strings, money wise, ‘n a good complement to Jeff Gate’s article. Sure, as long as the Fed Reserve is owned-managed by mbrs of said outfit, not auditable,with the exclusive right to print ALL the money, the Mafia wants, we will remain slaves of the Windsors-Tel Aviv. In all Commonwealt countries the Queen of GB is the rightly owner of Public Land. Can claim it anytime she wants, from CND to AUS.

charlotte July 20, 2010 at 4:51 pm

wow! I learn so much from your “comments”
check out the Sasson family with the Rothchilds.
they have the ear of H Clinton, our Sec of state right now.

I agree with most of this article. The part I do not get is where the author claims their are a bunch of jews speaking out against these crimes against the USA. I read of many jews who are criticle of Israel but not many that decry the jewish money creation compound interest scam. Not many at all.

Ronald Reagan’s jew advisors who recommended “trickle down” economics knew exactly what would and did happen. Jews in the FED scam stole so much that quite a bit trickled down to your avg jew. This is the most logical explanation for the avg jews silence or outright support on/for the FED banks.

Even if some jews are totally innocent and suffer? So what. A million dead innocent muslims are simply called “collatoral damage” by the jew media.

Well, there is Ralph Schoenman who wrote The Hidden History of Zionism
and explains the mechanics of the financial fraud at
Taking Aimhttp://www.takingaimradio.com/shows/audio.html
in the Fictitious Capital series.
But he is a secular political person. It’s a matter of heart, not religion. Or ethnic origin.

What the Mossad is doing. It’s not good. Yet everyone must speak to them. And while their lives might be thwarted from achieving their individual potentials, at least their physical bodies are not being ruined like their victims are. I believe they themselves are manipulated and are patsies for others who have social engineering aims. This would explain “behaviourially” why they can be so adept at creating others as patsies.

The stuff on the Dancing Israelis is not difficult to drudge up – it’s all information in the public domain, available to anyone. The FBI is either sleeping on the job or just doesn’t care. I suspect they are in the clutches of the Mossad.

it appears that american fools are the best in the world for the zionist jewish nazi israelis who care only for themselves and no one else. they rob,murder,do treason and endanger american security but they are not guilty but muslims???
the next ruling state in the world will be israel and its foolish nazi policys in furtherance of a lie based on religious premises of being THE CHOSEN OF GOD or FROM THE NILE TO THE EUPHRATES. all prophets of god have spoken of they demise in the end times prior to which they will exhibit pure evil in the world by a false messiah called the antichrist being in their midst.
they have stolen trillions from the west and america and still muslims are guilty but not the devilish zionist jew?
a muslim seer of the 11th century nematallah shah wali quite clearly predicted the end of the israeli terrorist state 900 years ago which you can all read by googling his name in english, so far ALL he stated has come true to letter , word and name and times stated!
peace to all humanistic orientated people!

Thankfully we have the net to disclose the Jewish perfidy and deception that has us involved in multiple wars,gets us attacked on 911 and is bankrupting our nation.
Is there any wonder why senator “Lieberman” wants to create a internet “kill switch”?
By the way,Lieberman has been the sponsor of almost all of the liberty killing laws that have the word “patriot” in them.
This dual Isareli citizen is one of the worst traitors to our nation

And though the truth is now seeping out in America,what is America going to do about it. Nothing ,that is because only 20% of Americans at most can think for themselves .
at least 50% are brain dead,and 30% are no longer with this world they exist only for video games and fast cars.
America has been so totally dysfunctional as a society it no longer has the ability to
address the problems that are now becoming insurmountable in USA .
I sure hope Americans can bring all back home but I am extremely skeptical of that ever becoming a reality.

Pollard stole our nuclear launch codes for Israel, which the sold them to the former Soviet Union. There was a two year period when both Israel and the Soviets could have stopped or started our nuclear forces.

“Being played for a fool”, if it was only that harmless. No, it has cost thousands of soldiers lives, trillions in money spent that is lost forever, a complete loss of our civil rights that go back to 1215 in England, and foreshadows a bleak future of poverty, and subjugation for the American people.

Rise up and throw off the Israeli and British domination of America.

By the way, both Bush Senior and Greenspan are Knights of the British Empire, having been so designated while on their knees pledging loyalty to the Queen in official ceremonies.

Geat article, Jeff Gates, and as usual with the facts on the table.
As a rule of thumb, expect any person of Jewish origin to be contacted and recluted as a ‘Sayan’ (plural = Sayanim). Some even volunteer as walk-in to any Israeli Embassy or trusted Rabbi, to work for Israel, others are ‘leant on’ gently or the hard way if the MOSSAD-Israeli agents (AIAPC-ADL-Jewish Academic Activists, etc.)consider that they have access to info-documents-technologies or key-persons whereabout and work important to Israel. That’s how the Sayanim System Works: personal contacts-persuasion.

The financially powerful Zionists, such as Silverstein, would fall under the category of Rothschild “agents” rather than “Sayanim”. As agents they have much greater knowledge and regular communication with the planners behind the governing facade presented to the public. I would consider such personages on par with the Rockefellers, Morgans and other oligarchs in the US.

The Sayanim are simply sympathetic individuals who are called upon to play some small part in providing plausible deniability for agents and assets in the roll out of any planned action. For example those who were tallied by the MSM to claim they saw a commercial airline plunge into the Pentagon, despite all visual, aeronautical and rational evidence to the contrary.

AJHenry July 19, 2010 at 2:38 pm

A few useful links to assist those who are new to the idea of Jewish perfidy

Benjamin Freedman, former Zionist insider, said it all in 1961, “The reason is that here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government…the Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.”
(http://iamthewitness.com/archive.php?dir=audio/Benjamin.H.Freedman/)

In 1983 Admiral Thomas Moorer said the same thing, “”I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would RISE UP IN ARMS. Our citizens certainly don’t have any idea what goes on.”

It seems that Voltaire was on to something when he made the following statements about Jews:

“You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables, in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny.”

“They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race…”

Yes, I have an opinion on that, and my opinion is: Lyndon LaRouche is out of his “mind” if that’s what he really believes.

S. Langdon July 20, 2010 at 9:28 am

The Rothschilds, in partnership with the Queen, are believed to control Great Britain and the Commonwealth. The Rothschilds funded much of the initial capital that resulted in the formation of Israel. The Rothschilds also funded the Knesset building and the Israeli Supreme Court Building, as well as the purchase of a considerable portion of the original land in Israel. The Rothschilds are believed to control Mossad and putatively through their partinership with the Queen, MI5/MI6. The Rothschilds, along with other European banking families and the Rockefellers and a number of other US industrial/banking families control the Federal Reserve and virtually all other Central Banks and the printing of fiat currency out of nothing (the reason why, it is alleged, they suppress the price of gold and silver through JP Morgan Chase). The Rockefellers, through Jay (John D, IV) Rockefeller in the Senate, appear have some control over the CIA (perhaps considerable) and also have controlling interests in the US oil, chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Some have speculated that Rockefeller control over much of the US Military Industrial Complex and the CIA was set up by Nelson Rockefeller when he was Vice President (same time his brother David was setting up Trilateral Commission with Zbigniew Brzezinski) after they removed Nixon from office for what otherwise would be considered today to be child’s play (breaking into Democratic headquarters and lying about it- are you kidding me?). It is believed that Ford became President as a reward (payback) for his (corrupted?) participation on the Warren Commission.
The Rothschilds control both Reuters and through Reuters, Associated Press, principal sources of most news stories in the Mainstream Press. That is perhaps why much of your mainstream news stories are so biased toward Israel and why there is such a slant in the news. The mainstream media in the United States is controlled by the Military Industrial Complex (GE and Westinghouse)and by a number of families, who are identified as having strong Zionist tendencies. There is no independent news services in the United States (with the exception of the alternative news services on the internet- perhaps the principal reason why Joseph Lieberman provides cover for the wholesale takeover of the internet, putatively to prevent a terrorist (cyber) attack). Some have argued that there simply are too many stories, too many articles and too much truth which contradicts both the US and Zionist narratives and this is causing tremendous problems for the PTB to continue to convince the American sheeple to go along with their fleecing. Essentially, the controlled media (for the reasons described above) are losing viewership/readership and credibility amongst the American people.
A number of 911 truthers speculate (and considerable evidence supports the view) that the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon were a partnership operation between CIA/Mossad (Rockefeller/Rothschild) to provide a rationale for the US attack on Afghanistan and Iraq and the denigration of Muslims. Oil, war profiteering and Israeli security (including the promise for a greater Israel as part of the historical Zionist narrative) are all part of the mix. The Mainstream News Services (all military industrial complex and/or Zionist family controlled), and notably Reuters and AP, were able to control the media narrative in the aftermath of 911, and Israeli dual citizens or strong Israeli loyalists were placed in strategic (chokehold) positions in the 911 aftermath to frustrate evidence gathering and potential prosecution of the real culprits.
The CIA/Mossad partnership is reputed to be found in the Enron scandal, the Madoff scandal, the poppy fields of Afghanistan and money laundering through the Central Bank of Iraq (JPM). That partnership also appears to be involved/responsible for virtually all of the false flag terror attacks (including Oklahoma City, both WTC attacks, London 7/7, Madrid, Christmas Day underwear bomber, etc.) which have been used continually as a rationale to corrupt and withdraw constitutional rights from American citizens.

rick dimbath July 20, 2010 at 3:59 pm

S. Langdon IS CORRESCT !!!! 🙂

rick dimbath July 20, 2010 at 4:00 pm

(CORRECT)

forthurst July 20, 2010 at 6:40 pm

first of all the Queen does not control anything. Second, the Commonwealth is a fig leaf to hide the dissolution of the British Empire. Third, the Rothchilds may be involved in financial ‘operations’ but I very much doubt they control MI5/6 and certainly not Mossad or are you suggesting the Rothchilds masterminded 9/11? I’m reading no further because this is so much nonsense and probably posted as deliberate obfuscation of an article which makes, alas, some sense.

S. Langdon July 21, 2010 at 11:43 am

The Rothschilds and Rockefellers did not mastermind 911 and probably had little, if anything, to do with it. They were merely aware of it. If you don’t believe that, simply review the following video. That will straighten out your views.

The bottom line is that neocons/PNAC think tank provided the rationale, CIA/Mossad were proxies or operatives- Mossad and various sayanim principally at the WTC, CIA provided identity theft/phony passports (Michael Springmun) which allowed the Arabs to be pinned as patsies.

The Rockefellers and Rothschilds do not get their fingers dirty. They stay apprised for shorting opportunities.

Ben Yahya July 20, 2010 at 8:26 pm

Mr. Landgon is 100% CORRECT.

Penumbra July 19, 2010 at 3:03 pm

Jeff – keep up the good fight!

kelli,

It has nothing to do with the “British Empire” (as ostensibly understood from history) which no longer exists in its Imperial form (e.g. under the headship of the Royal Family). What Larouche and many others refer to is “The Crown at Temple Bar” which is the seat of the real power both of the UK and globally. It is the seat of banking families headed by the most powerful, that being The Rothschilds.

As the Rothschilds’ progenitor, Mayer Amschel, stated over 200 years ago, “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws”.

It is the Crown of London (the 1 mile sq banking center of London) that owns the preponderance of our debt and thus the control over our nation, as they have done since 1871 without interruption and – with the exception of the brief period of sovereignty regained for us by Andrew Jackson when he booted the Rothschilds from our shores and reclaimed sovereign, Constitutional fiscal control – in the preceding period all the way back to the end of the Revolution.

The history we were taught in school about winning our independence failed to mention the machinations undertaken by Nathan Rothschilds to ensure we never really did apart from populist slogans.

If we ever expect to BE a truly independent and sovereign nation, the Federal Reserve System must be abolished from these shores, The UN, IMF, World Bank and their extortionist IRS must also be abolished or ejected, the fraudulently inserted 14th and 16th Amendments removed from the Constitution (with the original 13th amendment restored) and Federal power limited to only those areas expressly enumerated.

Such a sweeping systemic change is doubtful at best, however, without another revolution. On this point, I do NOT mean the largely semi-literate efforts of the now conscripted Tea Party movement nor the Laissez Faire pundits of the Libertarian Party, however sincere many within both camps may be. By using the mechanisms of our present fundamentally corrupt system, both of these disgruntled constituencies have allowed themselves to be co-opted and neutralized by those profiting most from the status quo.

2+2=4 July 20, 2010 at 1:43 am

Well said! It is quite refreshing to see that people are starting to wrap their brains around the true “root of all evil” – The Money Masters! From the dawn of man, they set out to establish themselves as the “chosen” ones. It’s all about greed, power and control. Keep the plebs uneducated, entertained, and in fear of a “higher power”, and they will do as they are commanded, for they fear the consequences (terror). Only when the “principalities and powers” fear the masses, will the people once again be free. This is why we need to bring our soldiers home now! “They” are intentionally using bogus “false-flag terrorism” as a tool to brainwash young minds and loyal patriots into fighting their perpetual wars. All for PROFIT! Even BP’s quarterly profits are way up…..go figure!!! If I hear one more soldier say “we’re fighting to keep America free,” I’m gonna puke! You are a corporate tool. You are fighting for Opium and Weapons sales! Wake up, resist, come home alive, and take care of your family…… while you still have one….. or while they still have you. Don’t be fodder. Defend OUR borders, not Israel’s.

Kelly L July 20, 2010 at 9:41 am

Note that with respect to the Tea Party, one of the principal backers of Sarah Palin is none other than Lynn Forrester de Rothschild, wife of Evelyn de Rothschild.

Penumbra July 20, 2010 at 4:40 pm

I am not surprised in the least to hear that and indeed fully expect Rothschild family involvement in Palin’s efforts to bedazzle the largely ignorant public.

Given the fact that I have long since written off ALL mainstream political candidates -of both “parties”- as leveraged agents/assets of the same foreign power, that being the financial empire of Rothschilds and Associates (Rockefeller, Morgan, Kuhn and Loeb. et al), I haven’t given the brainless bimbo Palin any more attention than I would a fly on the wall.

The real threat requiring constant scrutiny are those who stand outside the limelight.

Paulb July 20, 2010 at 7:16 pm

I still think Palin doesn’t quite realize that her sheer un-electability was a major reason for her being allowed as McCain’s running mate. Her continued political profile since demonstrates the sheer contempt for the American people that her operators have.

Justin July 19, 2010 at 8:06 pm

LaRouche isn’t far off the mark when you consider this 1940 Congressional record. I would print this out and read it.

It’s quite possible, LaRouche’s idiotic public statements about the English throne controlling everything notwithstanding. It’s something I’ve long suspected. Whenever Jews have acted decisively through their banking systems to alter the course of political events, two countries, the United States and Great Britain were always in the forefront of the planning and funding efforts. This was especially true in 1917 when American and English Jewish bankers funded the overthrow of the czarist regime in Russia. This event likely reflected the policy of the British government in its pursuit of political domination in Eurasia, while spearheaded by the Jews as agents of Britain, who sought one of their own–Trotsky–to lead Russia in the years following the czarist collapse. Remember, America was still a babe in the woods politically, although controlled by some of the same forces shaping British foreign policy. I recall Jacob Schiff, an American Jewish financier, giving 20 million dollars of his own money to support the Bolshevik overthrow of the Romanoffs. He certainly didn’t do it at the behest of Woodrow Wilson. That leaves Great Britain and its foreign policy wonks, undoubtedly including some Jews, as the likely instigators of the Revolution to which he contributed. Curiously, something similar happened at the collapse of the Soviet Union, when Jewish oligarchs (Oleg Deripaska, cited by Gates above, is one), working as Western agents, took over much of Russian industry, acquiring billions in ill-begotten wealth. In this case American influence was predominant in creating the new system, while in both periods Jews held prestigious positions in government, academia and industry.

Hal July 20, 2010 at 10:17 am

A potentially important development is occurring in Germany as the German Central Bank refuses to go along with the bailout of Europe. This may result in Germany withdrawing from the European Union and establishing a new EURO currency with other Baltic States.
It is also interesting to note that many younger Germans are not buying wholesale into the Zionist holocaust narrative (they are not deniers, merely researchers) and are starting to do research on the Jewish holocaust to provide a historically distinguishable narrative to contradict the Zionist narrative (which has cast them as the worst criminals and beasts in human history and allows Zionist Israelis to rationalize and/or deflect criticism for all sorts of criminal behavior). The wholesale refusal of the various European states to allow any academic research into holocaust history (any deviation from the Zionist narrative will result in years in prison and/or professional ostracism, regardless of the care taken in or accuracy of the research- e.g., Nicholas Kollerstrom) does not sit well with younger Germans.
Additionally, given the Russian history of Bolshevism and articles by Pravda and Russia today about 911 (strikingly more accurate than US MSM), and the clear attempts by Germany and Russia to coordinate commercial activities (gas pipelines, etc.), closer German Russian ties and their similar histories as perceived victims of international bankers and/or Zionism (however imagined), may represent a dangerous problem going forward.

Paulb July 20, 2010 at 7:18 pm

Any narrative that needs to be protected by law is a narrative with something to hide.

Carpenter July 20, 2010 at 10:55 am

Can anyone seriously suggest that the British royal family were in favor of the dethronement and eventual liquidation of the Russian royal family by the Bolsheviks? What on earth would they get from their supposed willing alliance with International Jewry to balance against not only their close blood ties with the Romanovs but also the increased threat to their own position (and even lives)? I’m afraid it is all a conspiracy too far for me.

And BTW, are you people not aware of how Islamophilic Prince Charles is?

Penumbra July 20, 2010 at 5:42 pm

Carpenter,

Once again I stress that there is an erroneous conflation occurring in people’s understanding of what is meant by the “British Crown”. It is NOT the essentially ceremonial figureheads of the British “Monarchy” or “Throne”, but rather the Rothschild money masters whose seat of juristic power is known as “The Crown Temple” or “The Inns of Court at Crown Temple”. The seat of financial power is of course “The Square Mile” aka The City of London. Together these two elements manage the economic and legal fraud that has governed most of the planet through their many long established national franchises (i.e. Federal Reserve Bank, US Bar Association – “legal” system).

This is the “Crown” that has orchestrated and financed history shaping events certainly since the time of Nathan Rothschild (early post-American Revolutionary Period), who had by 1815 seized control of the entire British economy in a devious ploy based on advanced knowledge of the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo.

With that economic power in hand, Nathan established the Bank of England and from thenceforth onwards set the family dynasty on the path of consolidating the financial control of all European nations, the US and the rest of the world.

Only a handful of nations do not yet have Rothschild-controlled central bank. Would it surprise you to know that of these are some of the very nations which have been most often cited by the MSM as “Evil” countries?

Iraq and Afghanistan were two of such countries until of course we invaded them. Iran, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea are amongst those few that remain outside the fold. Puts added perspective on the impetus behind events of the past few decades, wouldn’t you say?

Penumbra, you are absolutely right (response to Carpenter). The trend has been putting Jews at the top of every National Bank worldwide. Until president Chavez took over in Venezuela, the presidents of the BCV was Ruth de Krivoy, of FOGADE (F D G) was Esther de Margoulis, of the journalists guild-union was Benshimol ‘n the person in charge of cultural affairs, Sofia Ember, all Jewish-Israel firsters. In Denmark, appointed by the Queen, the president of the Danish National Bank, Niels Bernstein, is Jewish…

K. Rechtstein July 20, 2010 at 8:56 pm

The Windsor didn’t complot to overthrow the Romanov. Who did were the Rothschilds: A clever move, only understod by those who know how the ‘Jewish’ mind works: “Never trust a Goy ‘n never put all your eggs in one basket”, i.e. “have always at least 2 cards to play with, but in distinct hands”. The Bolchevic Revolution was the brainchild of Russian Jews, majority of the ‘Politburo’, (= US key positions in Congress-Senate-NSA-Finance-Trade-H.Security…). Just in case anything goes out of control in the West.

i think this is his way of saying “israel”, since its the same families that run israel, britain and the US.

britain, has been our enemy since the revolutionary war, and the world wars certainly didn’t change that. we should have attacked britain when they needed our help. too bad the zionists were already in control of our country at that time, hell since its formation by the masonic elitist upper-noble class forefathers.

Brian July 20, 2010 at 2:13 pm

The two interests are certainly fused in the aspect of the Rotschild dynasty and the Freemasonic cult. Ultimately it could be said that each sees itself as directing the other. The Israeli fascists conceive themselves as in charge of the universe. The British fascists are equally clever and treacherous, and surely see themselves as using Israel for their purposes. Add America (not the alpha dog!) and it amounts to a fascist Cerberus, a three-headed police dog with no loyalty to anything but its own appetite for power. Maybe one head will eat the others. But America has rolled over and exposed its neck (finance) and genitals (military command) as a sign of abject submission to the other two. Funny because America is still the biggest dog. But Israel has the true little dog complex — bark bark! My call: Britain rules! The City of London is still the apex of the power pyramid, and the Royals are steeped in evil like an old teabag.

K. Rechtstein July 21, 2010 at 9:17 am

Excellent metaphores Brian, describe Amerca’s-the world actual tragic situation as It really is, due to the myths created by think tanks of the Zion Talmudic Mafia, a tacit understanding btwn the Rothschild power house, the House of the Windsors ‘n corrupt British ‘n US Politicians. They all team up, staging events, shaping policies favorable to Israel, perverting-undermining systematically the legal fundaments ‘n tissue fabric of the affected societies, knowingly(paid hands) or by deception-infiltration

rick dimbath July 20, 2010 at 3:55 pm

Lyndon LaRouche is clued in on the real reality which is why
he is never on main stream media or in main stream magazines.
ISRAEL/BRITIAN our “closest allies” , barf ,puke, utter dis-info,
( not a reference that includes the people of Britian, they are in an
advanced State of Police/Regulatory STATE on LSD.

About Us

Veterans Today (VT) is an independent online journal representing the positions and providing news for members of the military and veteran community in areas of national security, geopolitical stability and domestic policy. All writers are fully independent and represent their own point of view and not necessarily the point of view of any other writer, administrator or entity.