The crowned kings of censorship
Google have "pulled" the News 24 "timestamp"
video that shows the BBC reporting the collapse
of Building 7 26 minutes before it happened. Meanwhile,
the establishment media continues to ignore the
WTC 7 farce as a whole, including the inconceivable
notion that BBC World have mysteriously lost all
their 9/11 footage.

Despite the fact that the clip is
under 30 seconds in length and clearly constitutes
fair use, Google yanked the video last night after
it was prominently
featured in our article yesterday. We have
replaced the video with a You Tube composite of
both the "Jane Standley" footage and
the News 24 clip, but for how long this stays
active remains to be seen.

Google and the BBC have a cozy relationship and are
currently at an advanced
stage of talks to content share on Google Video. This could explain
why the original
"Standley" footage was yanked by Google within hours
of it becoming popular on the Internet on Monday afternoon.

Should all this really surprise us when it was CIA seed
money that got Google off the ground in the first place? Just how
many calls did Google's
CIA liaison Dr. Rick Steinheiser make from his Office of Research
and Development this week?

Meanwhile, a programmer claims to
have hacked Digg and found evidence of a deliberate
campaign to censor controversial news stories
and those relating to 9/11 truth.

The Information
Liberation website concludes that there are
"Tons of obvious shills burying our recent
explosive WTC 7 articles as well as many other
articles of extreme significance. It's shocking
to read
the list and see how much significant, documented,
and extremely popular content is being buried
for obvious ideological reasons. This is completely
undemocratic abuse of the Digg system and is proof
positive the Bury feature is being abused to suppress
content by vindictive Anti-Diggers."

The buried list contains the original
Building 7 story that was posted at Prison
Planet.com on Monday afternoon. It's reason for
burial is given as "inaccurate," despite
the fact that we have proven its factual basis
in triplicate and the BBC has also tacitly admitted
their "error."

Digg's Bury feature is supposed
to be used to bury "stories with bad links,
off-topic content, or duplicate entries"
in order to remove "spam out of the system."
Unfortunately, as many have experienced, the Bury
feature is frequently used to suppress content
based off ideology. Please encourage Digg to either
fix it (perhaps make it similar to Reddit's down
voting) or remove it all together. Email
Digg here and request they please fix the
Bury feature.

Whether you choose to believe that
it's solely the work of moronic debunkers or a
deliberate Digg policy to censor 9/11 truth, the
fact remains that their supposed "democratic"
system is nothing of the sort. Even if an article
gets 2000 diggs, just a fraction of that number
in burials relegates it to the memory hole. Digg
should be more honest about the fact that the
content of their website is determined at the
behest of a small minority of semi-retarded Playstation
addicted teenagers rather than the popular interest
of the online community as a whole.

We have uncovered further evidence
of Digg censorship and it will feature on the
website later tonight.

This represents both the stubborn
refusal of the dinosaur press to accept the increasing
trend that the Internet sets the news agenda,
and also an appalling media culture that highlights
the most inconsequential claptrap and gives it
undeserved prominence.

Kudos
goes to Wonkette for covering the Building
7 story, but almost every other so-called "progressive"
website has been mute. Crooks and Liars, one of
the biggest liberal blogs on the web, today spotlights
a story about lesbian koala bears. On
Tuesday night they led with a gossip puff
piece about Mitt Romney's hair. How can these
gatekeepers claim to represent "alternative
media" when they stuff this kind of crap
down our throats on a daily basis, while ignoring
massive stories like the WTC 7 fiasco?

We invited BBC World head of news
Richard Porter to appear on The Alex Jones Show
and clarify for us exactly how the BBC managed
to lose its footage, which by the BBC's
own regulations has to be archived three times
over, from the single most important event
in history since World War 2.