Normally as a scientist I would not categorically state such a thing but for this match I will be using the Jeremy standard of debate. Although for the purposes of this match and what I want to demonstrate it won't matter which position I take as long as I claim with absolute certainty.

If Jeremy accepts then there is one question that I would first like to ask him before starting the debate properly.

Normally as a scientist I would not categorically state such a thing but for this match I will be using the Jeremy standard of debate. Although for the purposes of this match and what I want to demonstrate it won't matter which position I take as long as I claim with absolute certainty.

If Jeremy accepts then there is one question that I would first like to ask him before starting the debate properly.

This debate would never end with Jeremy's circular game . You would reach 100,000 posts very fast.

(01-06-2014 11:41 AM)Leo Wrote: This debate would never end with Jeremy's circular game . You would reach 100,000 posts very fast.

Which perfectly explains Jeremy's dishonest tactics. He's performing a gish gallop. All he cares about is to make it look like there is a real debate when there isn't. It is why he repeats the same flawed arguments over and over again but because they get drowned out by loads of responses lurkers don't get to properly evaluate his position. This is why he has flounced so many boxing matches. There is no substance to his argument and nowhere to hide.

I had hoped that he might want to go for an easier target, someone stating with 100% certainty that there is no god. But alas no, he's only interested in creating an impression. He's lying for Jesus and intellectually dishonest and not bothered that people become theists because they were fooled. The only important thing to him is that they eventually become Christian and the first step towards that is to make it look like there is doubt on the unassailable position of atheism.

Normally as a scientist I would not categorically state such a thing but for this match I will be using the Jeremy standard of debate. Although for the purposes of this match and what I want to demonstrate it won't matter which position I take as long as I claim with absolute certainty.

If Jeremy accepts then there is one question that I would first like to ask him before starting the debate properly.

you cannot prove with absolute certainty that God does not exist and I cannot prove with absolute certainty that He does.

Normally as a scientist I would not categorically state such a thing but for this match I will be using the Jeremy standard of debate. Although for the purposes of this match and what I want to demonstrate it won't matter which position I take as long as I claim with absolute certainty.

If Jeremy accepts then there is one question that I would first like to ask him before starting the debate properly.

you cannot prove with absolute certainty that God does not exist and I cannot prove with absolute certainty that He does.