Why Europe will cave to Greece

A prediction for you: Greece and the European Union will split the difference in their quarrel over debt relief. What’s uncertain is how their respective governments will justify the new deal, and how much damage they’ll inflict on each other before accepting the inevitable.

EU governments, with Germany in the lead, are saying that debt writedowns are out of the question. Debts are debts. Greece’s newly elected leader, Alexis Tsipras, calls the current settlement “fiscal waterboarding” and says his country faces a humanitarian crisis. His government won’t pay and wants much of the debt written off. Neither side is willing to give way.

What surprises me is that this all-or-nothing positioning takes anybody in.

Debts are debts? Please. Europe’s governments have already provided debt relief to Greece. (In that process, private creditors saw their loans written down; most of what remains is owed to governments.) However, the plan hasn’t worked. Greece’s fiscal position was so bad that the haircuts, reschedulings and interest-rate concessions weren’t sufficient to restore its creditworthiness. At the same time, thanks to slower-than-expected growth, the fiscal conditions tied to the settlement proved harsher than intended. Greek voters have just repudiated those terms.

In other words, the existing settlement has failed. It therefore needs to be revised. No conceptual revolution is required. This conclusion follows from the same kind of analysis that EU governments have already relied on.

For sure, granting additional debt relief has drawbacks — just as there were drawbacks to granting debt relief in the first place. It sends a bad message; it encourages bad behavior in future; it will inflame resentment among voters in other EU countries. That’s why it’s a good idea, so far as possible, to make relief conditional on efforts to behave responsibly. But the likely consequences of any EU refusal to budge are much worse.

Outright debt forgiveness would be hard for Europe’s leaders to sell to their own voters; like Tsipras, they’ve boxed themselves in. However, they can provide debt relief in many other ways: ‘Extend and pretend,’ as it’s called.

There’s a serious risk that Greece will default unilaterally. This would not be in Greece’s interests, but it’s too close a call for comfort. The existing settlement will require the government to run primary budget surpluses (that is, excluding interest payments) in the neighborhood of 4 per cent of gross domestic product. That means that if Greece defaulted, it could cut taxes or raise public spending substantially without needing to borrow.

The downside of default would be huge — possible ejection from the euro system. That would be a calamity for Greece and, because of the risk of contagion, for the rest of the euro area as well. Nonetheless, if the EU offers Tsipras nothing, that’s how things could turn out.

Therefore, in the end, the EU won’t offer nothing. But the posturing on both sides needs to stop and discussions of a possible compromise need to start quickly, or Tsipras and the EU could talk themselves into the worst-case scenario they both want to avoid.

Outright debt forgiveness would be hard for Europe’s leaders to sell to their own voters; like Tsipras, they’ve boxed themselves in. However, they can provide debt relief in many other ways. “Extend and pretend,” as it’s called, is relief by another name. Maturities could be stretched further. Debt-service costs could be cut again with concessionary interest rates, perhaps including a moratorium on payments. The creditors could tie debt service to Greece’s growth rate — the stronger its economy, the more it pays. Tsipras has already broached this last possibility.

The EU should also agree to modify Greece’s supervised austerity program. Some of the projected primary surplus should be given back to Greek voters in the form of social spending.

Now that Tsipras has won his election, he needs to be less of a populist demagogue and more of a pragmatic leader. He should recognize the need for further structural economic reforms, and offer commitments in exchange for debt relief. As Reza Moghadam, former head of the International Monetary Fund’s Europe department, notes in a column for the Financial Times, Syriza is an anti-establishment party. Despite its hard-left policy platform, it could be more open than its predecessors to breaking the grip of entrenched interests. Its election success can’t be undone in any event. It’s an opportunity worth exploring.

Does Greece deserve this new dispensation? It’s a fair question, but there’s no straightforward answer and it’s largely beside the point. A new compromise on Greek debt is the best feasible outcome not just for Greece but also, in view of the risks, for Germany and the other EU countries. They just need to get on with it.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by all iPolitics columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of iPolitics.

It just seems as though its become far too easy to blame any given ‘public’ for the decisions their government officials do or the free ride oligarchs take,they influence. Not once, has anyone noted how the crimes of our century were perpetrated by Wall Street fraudsters and yet not one has been held up as criminal or charged. The total amount paid in fines as bribes in lieu of criminal actions could easily cover a portion of what is owed by Greece to the EU. How truly ironic, for the ‘public’ to now be expected to oversee their officials and corporate/banking bosses, which would leave them no time work to pay all the taxes, including those taxes others in position, avoid. There is something very wrong with the ‘way things’ are, compared to more democratic times. One also wonders how long the global ‘public’ can continue to do all for so few, who are irresponsible and undeserving?

“conditional on efforts to behave responsibly”, You’ve got to be kidding. The world gets taken by a financial system that stole from everyone and gave to a few and this journalist thinks that people should behave responsibly? I think that Clive Crook needs to better educate himself.
I suggest that Greece do what Iceland did in 2006 and tell the world to go to heck, declare bankruptcy and change the rules so that this problem doesn’t happen again.