Re: [Nano-devel] GNU nano 2.1.2

Im (more than) a little rusty here, but do we need that kind of coordination for the unstable series?

I honestly don't remember if there was some agreed-on process for synchronizing prior to a release, so perhaps now is a good time to revisit that process regardless. Where were before and will that serve our needs now?

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 07:40:48PM +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > 2008/04/24 - GNU nano 2.1.2 "New York City" is released.
> Ouch. This does not contain any of the eleven PO file updates that
> were made since the release of 2.1.0 last March. (The 2.1.1 tarball
> does not contain them either, but it didn't occur to me to check,

Sorry! I had no idea 2.1.2 was going to be released soon, so I never
refreshed these myself.

> It would be even better if this could be inserted somewhere into the
> 'make dist' target.

And this was my plan, but being swamped I never got that far. GNU
Mailutils got rid of PO files in CVS entirely. The bootstrap script gets
the stuff from the TP. We don't need to go that far, I guess, but
copying makefile.am bits from any other project that does this is
something we need to do to avoid this in the future.