Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Monday, March 30, 2015

What is it about the word “Rome” that has the same effect on many people which the utterance of “Niagara Falls” had on the Three Stooges? (Frenzy and apoplexy).

The rabbis despise Rome. Is it any wonder that Protestant Fundamentalists have followed suit? Modern Catholics are also conforming. A few years ago I endured a Jesuit sermon in the course of which Pontius Pilate was termed a “thug.” The homilist cast no such opprobrium on the anonymous “leaders of the people” (no further identification is permitted), who had howled for Christ’s blood.

We get mail from Protestant Roman-haters who are taken aback when we point out that the legions of Rome were chosen by God to fulfill his Son’s prophecy and obliterate the corrupt system of Temple worship in AD 70. It was the finest moment of the greatest army that had ever marched. Much of the history of that divine victory remains unknown. For example, in Revisionist History issue no. 77, we point out that at least one documentary source indicates that Roman General Titus refused credit for the victory, saying that it had been the work of the “God of the Jews,” and not him!

The Talmud is not pleased with this Roman commander. The Talmud has Titus in hell. The punishment which he suffers for eternity is to be burned to ashes, reconstituted, and burned again.

Rabbinic hatred is equally eternal. The first leader of the Israeli state, Ben-Gurion, took the name of an anti-Roman rebel, and the contemporary Judaic terror group Betar is named for the headquarters of anti-Roman zealots.

On March 31 of this Holy Week, which leads to Good Friday and Resurrection Sunday, the CBS television network will broadcast a two-part, four hour miniseries, “The Dovekeepers,” which, needless to say, glorifies the Jews who rejected their Messiah, and portrays the Romans as unrelievedly vile and despicable. American “secular” television is indistinguishable from Judaism’s Babylonian Talmud.

In all of the New Testament there is no one who Jesus praises more highly than the Roman Army Centurion, whose faith, Our Lord says, is greater than anyone in Israel. But Jesus doesn’t write television scripts, and His faithless people, the heirs of those who screamed “Crucify him!,” will be the ones celebrated and idolized on “The Dovekeepers” in this week that is most sacred to Christians. Is this mockery a coincidence? We think not.

Every year during Lent the controlled American media broadcast or publish ritual degradation of Christ timed to coincide with Christianity’s holiest season. Last year it occurred in the form of a widely circulated news report, initiated by the New York Times, concerning the discovery of a papyrus said to “prove” that Jesus had a wife. “Harvard University experts” were invoked. Later, after the damage was done, the Times quietly admitted it had all been a hoax.

These perennial Talmudic rituals by the mainstream media are the ceremonial fulfillment of an undying, sub-rosa rabbinic malice for Jesus Christ and the Romans.

The hypno-patsies in the pews of the steeple houses of Judeo-Churchianity are of course, oblivious.

Mr. Gurvitz points out that exceptions to bigoted Talmudic injunctions are permitted where Judaics are in subjection to the goyim (gentiles), and where news of Judaism’s discrimination toward the goyim, would cause an uprising of “potential animosity” (mishum eivah) toward Judaics.Therefore, to avoid a rebellion by the goyim if the truth were known, devious disavowals of the rabbinic law are made in public for the sake of pacifying ("mipnei darkhei shalom") the gullible goyim.

The occult is indeed alive and well inside so-called "traditional Catholicism." Occultism is not an exclusively Left wing or liberal phenomenon, though the Cryptocracy would like us to believe that it is limited to the Left. “Fatima priest” Fr. Gruner’s alliance with the Talmudic rabbi, as documented in Gruner's own video, is evidence of this (see Pinay, above).

This “Dante and Lull” conference will take place in Italy on May 29, twenty-five days after the 500th anniversary of the initiation, by Medici Pope Leo X, of a process of gradualism, whereby the Church's immemorial dogmatic law against the charging of interest on loans of money was incrementally relaxed and diluted, leading to the complete abolition of all ecclesiastical penalties for usury by Pope Pius VIII in 1830, and the absence of all such penalties in the 1917 and 1983 Codes of Canon Law.

Will the Italian conference ostensibly dedicated to Dante, the scourge of usurers, note this malevolent anniversary and study its implications and methodology, whereby “pastoral” means were employed to gradually transform usury from a mortal sin to no sin at all? This “pastoral” technique for nullification of the Law of God should be familiar to all students of the devious tactics of revolutionary change agents, among whom the most notable contemporary example is the current pontiff, Pope Francis, spiritual heir of Giovanni di Lorenzo de’ Medici.

Furthermore, certain extreme Right wing “Catholic” occultists view the Tridentine Latin Mass as a magical rite and call for the “baptism" of the diabolic doctrines of Renaissance Hermeticism.

This is not the legacy of “Vatican II.” This is the legacy of the popes of the Renaissance and their co-conspirators, as we are endeavoring to establish in a revisionist history we hope to have finished, Deo volente, this autumn (“The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome”).

Friday, March 13, 2015

Here is more evidence that the Israelis are allied with the terrorists who are alleged to have killed thousands of Americans on Sept. 11, 2001:

Netanyahu’s Israeli government is aiding the terrorists of the Nusra Front — otherwise known as al Qaeda in Syria:

These shocking facts were buried in the third paragraph of a Wall St. Journal article titled, “Syria War Adds to Divide Between U.S., Israel."

Memo to Congress: wounded al Qaeda fighters who kill Syrian Christians are treated in Israeli hospitals and sent back to Syria to kill more.

Might this be news, worthy of follow-up investigation and massive publicity — and protest?

In the same article in the Wall Street Journal, Amos Yadlin, former head of Israeli military intelligence, states, “There is no doubt that Hezbollah and Iran are the major threat to Israel, much more than the radical Sunni Islamists…”AFTERWORD: As of March 19, it’s official — Americans are zombies — they could care less that Israeli hospitals are treating wounded al Qaeda (“Nusra Front”) terrorists. Due to the indifference and exhaustion of shell-shocked Americans, it’s not an issue. We are slouching toward immersion in mass enslavement and mental colonization. There is not even drama here. Reason and self-preservation have vanished from the collective consciousness without so much as a whimper. Whatever.

Editor’s Note: I received the usual hand-wringing reactions of outrage to Binyamin Netanyahu’s latest claim to the title of Emperor of the USA, as demonstrated by the reception he received on the eve of Purim from the loathsome lackeys and lickspittles in what is laughingly reputed to be the Congress of a free people. In fact, it was a marvelous spectacle because it offered prima facie evidence of the actual identity of the authentic ruler of our national legislature. Prof. Petras, in his guest column, mentions that a majority of Americans still believe that the U.S. is a free country. If that is an accurate reflection of the view of the multitude, then it would appear that a plurality of Americans are afflicted with a serious mental illness. We are ruled by the counterfeit “Israel” and fake “Jews” prophesied in Revelation 2:9. The hosannas offered in Congress to the High Priest Netanyahu, are ample testimony to this undeniable truth.

“Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.”—Mark Twain

How is it that the ruler (Benjamin Netanyahu) of a puny country (Israel) of 8.2 million (6.2 million Jews) with the 37th biggest economy (GDP in current prices) in the world dictates war policy and secures the willing submission of the legislature of the largest economy and most powerful military empire in the world?

What significance does Netanyahu’s speech to the US Congress have, beyond the fact that he uses it as a platform to attack the elected President of the US, to denounce US peace negotiations and to demand that Congress adopt policies designed to precipitate a war with Iran?

There is only one reason that Netanyahu is received as a Viceroy overseeing and dictating strategic policy to what clearly is a servile colonial legislature: over the past quarter of a century, Israel’s proxy in the US, an entire panoply of Zionist political organizations, government officials, propaganda mills, media moguls, billionaires and millionaires, have deeply penetrated the legislature, executive and administrative centers of decision making. Netanyahu’s arrogance and “brazen” presumption (Financial Times, 3/4/15, p. 6) to dictate policy to the US Congress is rooted in the pre-existing power base created by the proxy Zionist power configuration.

Netanyahu can sneer, with a crooked smile, at the US President, because, after several decades of Zionist permeation of the US state, he knows that he comes not as an outside power but as a leader and spokesperson of an inside power.

His presence was hailed by all the mass media as a major event, as international news, for over a month in advance. With Napoleonic presumption he dared to announce in advance that he would advance a war thesis in the fashion of any head of state. He can act as an unelected dictator because the elected officials have been converted into docile and complicit subjects by his proxy power structure. Netanyahu follows the political precept of his predecessor Ariel Sharon, who faced with Israeli worrywarts criticizing his obstreperous intervention in US politics, once stated “Don’t worry. We lead the US by the nose”.

The crucial theoretical point is that the conditions, that enabled Netanyahu to come, to see and to conquer, were not of his doing. His presence in the US Congress and his message is derived from the power of his supporters, deeply embedded in the structure of political power in the US.

Otherwise, who would take serious his delusional military fantasies, his clinically paranoid vision of peaceful adversaries, conspiring to “nuke Israel” and then the world, without a single nuclear bomb!

Prominent among Netanyahu’s financial backers are a group of prominent Zionist lumpen-bourgeoisie, billionaires who lent to millions of borrowers at extortionate rates(between 1400 and 4000% ) and played a leading role in the fraudulent mortgage induced crises of 2009-forward.They include Al Goldstein co-founder of AvantCredit and CashNetUSA; Sasha Orloff and Jacob Rosenberg founders of Lendup; Daniel Gilbert founder of QuickenLoans - a predator subprime lender; Ronald Arnall owner of Ameriquest... They used part of their ill-gotten gains to ease their consciences by donating millions to Israeli and US Jewish causes. Being generous to Israel provides a sort of perverse “absolution” for screwing millions of Americans.

One does not need much imagination to envision them cheering Netanyahu’s AIPAC and Congressional diatribes. It is not surprising that the lumpen-bourgeoisie backs a lumpen-prime minister.

The best and the brightest among the Zionist phalanx of pundits, professors, lawyers, economists and financiers have created an aura of gravitas and profundity around this vulgar beerhall brawler.

This raises a basic question: why do upwardly mobile, prosperous and elite-educated Zionist majorities enthusiastically pledge unconditional loyalty to a crude authoritarian foreign ruler who humiliates their country of birth?

Why did ten thousand American-born Zionist professionals stand and cheer, as they did the day before his congressional speech, as Netanyahu dictated his rabid bellicose political line to them at the AIPAC conference?Is it because they believe he is theirChosen Leader of their Chosen Fatherland?

Netanyahu, with all his vulgarity and mediocrity, strikes a deep and abiding chord in the soul of his Zionist followers. They believe they are the collective geniuses of a superior species, who need not abide by the legal norms of non-Zionist states and international laws which hinder his colonial rule over millions of Palestinians.

What else but that identity of superiority allows the educated and prosperous, the humane and the cruel, to bond and welcome Netanyahu, as a modern secular Moses crossing the Potomac, delivering “the Jews” (for the messianic Netanyahu claims to speak for “all Jews”) from the mortal threats (Iran) cultivated by gentile politicians. The great majority of Zionist activists are deaf, dumb and blind to those who criticize and refute his infantile and grotesque lies, the scrofulous screeds about non-existing “existential threats” which infest his speeches.

Worse they will terrorize and cow any critic, demand that their employers fire them, as they have done over the past two decades. They believe that the Palestinians, who Israel bombed into the Stone Age, are threats to Israel. They believe that nuclear weapon-less Iranians, facing hundreds of Israeli nuclear bombs, are a threat to Israel. They believe there is one “truth”: that all measures, speeches and actions, which enhance the power and glory of Israel, are virtuous. It is this “truth” that motivates hundreds of thousands of “virtuous” Zionists to donate hundreds of millions of dollars to buy and/or intimidate presidents and congresspeople, governors and mayors, university presidents and faculty, police informers and academic thugs.

It is this Zionist power configuration, which allows a political low-life like Netanyahu to enter and dominate the legislative chamber and tell US citizens where and when their next war should take place. It is for this power configuration that Congressmen and women “perform” - applauding and jumping up on cue for each and every one of Netanyahu’s emotional ejaculations.

Broad sectors of the Israeli public were immensely impressed by Netanyahu’s capacity to humiliate the President, by his willingness to dictate policy to the US and by the hyperkinetic docility and submissiveness of US Congress people. But this is not surprising: After all, Israelis are used to dominating Palestinians and torturing them into submission and colonizing a whole people. Why shouldn’t they gloat and puff up with pride when Netanyahu speaks and acts as a colonial viceroy to the US? After all, their leader is dominating a so-called ‘world power’!

No doubt the Israeli empire loyalists will overwhelmingly vote for Netanyahu, even if the “opposition” claims they also denounce the US-Iranian peace negotiations. Opposition leaders Isaac Herzog and Tzipi Livni don’t have Netanyahu’s gangster look, that crooked smile that says to the US leaders: “We lead you by the nose and you love it!” What the rest of the world thinks of a braying donkey in Washington led by the nose is not hard to imagine: US world leadership certainly is not foremost in their minds…

There is much idle chatter from liberals, leftists and progressives, claiming that Netanyahu’s ‘brazen intervention’ would backfire; that it would damage relations with the US; that it would weaken and undermine US-Israeli relations and allow Iran to secure nuclear weapons. Liberal Zionists claim that Netanyahu’s speech would weaken support for Israel among Democratic congress people. Liberal Zionists claim that Netanyahu’s speech would weaken US support for Israel (God forbid!).

These lamentations have no substance; they are mendacious concoctions of minds which lack any capacity to understand power especially the permanent power of the Zionist power configuration.

Even a cursory reading of the political facts which preceded, accompanied and followed Netanyahu’s Congressional dictates, demonstrates the exact opposite.

Immediately after Netanyahu’s intervention, Congressional leaders moved ahead to fast track legislation to heighten Iranian sanctions, to veto any Executive agreement. The Republication majority and over half of the Democrats chose to back the “foreign Viceroy” on policies of war and peace.

Far from “prejudicing” relations with the Obama regime, the Administration in the person of Secretary of State John Kerry vetoed a measure passed by the UN Human Right Commission condemning Israel’s savage war crimes against Palestinians… Obama’s United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power did her usual belly crawl for Israel at the AIPAC conference following Netanyahu’s rousing diatribe. US-Iranian “negotiations” in Switzerland increasingly turned on exactly the issues Netanyahu demanded. US Secretary of State Kerry insisted on on-going intrusive inspections of Iran’s entire nuclear and military installations; retaining most sanctions for a decade; eliminating most enriched uranium …In a word disarming Iran, increasing its military vulnerability to an Israeli nuclear attack, without any deterrence or retaliatory capacity! Iran is formally negotiating with Kerry on behalf of the 5 plus 1, but the agenda and demands are set by the raucous over-voice of Netanyahu, who is the most influential invisible presence.

In other words, there is ample evidence that Netanyahu’s intervention, far from ‘damaging’ US-Israeli relations, further reinforced Israel’s power over the US. By securing the Administration’s declarations of unconditional loyalty while humiliating the President and seizing executive prerogatives, Israel demonstrates to the world that it can and will dictate US strategic policy and denounce its President with total impunity.

Netanyahu is far from being ostracized. He has a global platform from which to spew his rabid chauvinist diatribes against peace and negotiations. His speech, its content and style, received front page and extended prime time coverage. His war-mongering resonated with the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post and US News and World Report.

Netanyahu’s political line inspired AIPAC’s ten thousand ultra-Zionists, who stormed Capital Hall and demanded Congress people and Congressional staff act on His message. Not a single dissenting voice emanated from the Presidents of the “52” — the 52 Major American (sic) Jewish organizations whose first loyalty continued to be toward Israeli interests as defined by their Prime Minister.

The voices of dissent among the few dozen Jews on Capitol Hill, and outside the AIPAC conference hall, did not register in Congress or among the vast majority of Jewish community leaders or in the mass media.

Contrary to the lamentations and claims that Netanyahu has “weakened” Israel, the facts on the ground demonstrate that he has strengthened his “leadership” among the billionaires who buy US Congressional leaders. He has demonstrated that US officials, even ones who he insults and attacks, will continue to support Israeli war crimes in international forums; regale Israel with $3 billion a year in military aid to enhance its military supremacy in the Middle East; and incorporate its demands in any strategic negotiations with ‘Islamic’ countries like Iran, even if it undermines the basis of any negotiated agreement.

Clearly Netanyahu alienated a minority of US Congressional Democrat but mostly on procedural issues of protocol rather than on the more substantive issues of mongering for war and sanctions against Iran. Netanyahu’s messianic claim to speak for “all Jews” did arouse over 2,000 American Jews and non-Jews to sign a paid advertisement denying his status as the Second Coming of Moses.

But as the rousing welcome and conclusion to his speech by the Congressional majority and the unanimity of AIPAC’s thousands demonstrate, Israel’s formidable Zionist power configuration still dominates US policy in the Middle East.

The ‘debate’ over Netanyahu’s episodic presence in the US Congress and humiliation of the US President is misplaced. What really needs to be debated is the more fundamental question of the permanent presence, power and prerogatives of the Zionist power configuration in the making of US Middle East policy.

No other visiting Prime Minister or President will be received with so much media attention and political fanfare as Netanyahu because none possess the formidable, organized, well-financed and disciplined political apparatus which Israel possess. This is an apparatus which defends and promotes US wars on behalf of Israel, Israel’s war crimes, land seizures and torture of Palestinians. That they support Netanyahu’s gross humiliation of Obama is not surprising – it merely confirms the “Law of the Return”: that for American Zionists there is only one true state of the Jews –and that is Israel; and that their only “true” leaders are Israelis… As it happens, today he is called Benjamin Netanyahu. And that any US policy, negotiations or agreements in the Middle East have to be in accord with their leader.

Congress knows that. The “52” know that.

Only the majority of the American electorate, who still believe they live in a free and independent country, is not privy to that reality, even though Netanyahu’s intervention in the US Congress and gross humiliation of the President should tell them otherwise.

But then we live in a peculiar sui generis ‘meritocracy’ in which the opinions of the 2%, the so-called chosen people, counts more than that of 98% of our citizens.

The critics, Jews and non-Jews, must realize that their problem with Netanyahu requires them to delve deeper, and that their opposition needs to become more systematic and more directly confrontational with the Zionist power configuration. Otherwise, there is no basis for believing that the US can end national humiliations and regain its status as a free and democratic republic.

Michael Hoffman’s study offers new documentation on rabbinic blasphemy and institutionalized hatred of Jesus and Mary and the Cross, and explores new territory in his analysis of Talmudism’s hatred for the Romans and how we have been tricked into despising them and blaming them for the Crucifixion.

Demonstrates the virtue and excellence of the great Roman General and of the next most hated “goy” in rabbinic lore, Isabella of Spain.

Also in this issue: Black African Operators of the Black African Slave Trade

New history of the Black Africans who did not merely “cooperate,” but were the instigators, managers and overseers of the “Gold Coast” African slave trade.