Need some advice from One-handers

I am in need of some advice. I am a Div. III college player and I am thinking about switching to something more maneuverable. I also have had elbow problems, namely golfer's elbow. The golfer's elbow was the worst while I played with the Prestige MP, but is flaring up again.

This means abandoning my ol' faithful Wilson 6.1 95 16x18 and I've narrowed it down to three rackets (via play-testing, SW, other specs).

**I'll probably be adding weight to the handle to bring the balance to around 8pts HL

I'm also a one-hander and don't think I would ever go Wilson again. Too frustrating to groove your strokes to wildly varying specs. It's ok when fooling around but when playing at a higher level, mismatched frames are a handicap.

I'm also a one-hander and don't think I would ever go Wilson again. Too frustrating to groove your strokes to wildly varying specs. It's ok when fooling around but when playing at a higher level, mismatched frames are a handicap.

Click to expand...

Interesting to hear. Thanks for your perspective, I agree about Wilson's QC. Seems to me like I have to special order from TW or find matched frames on e Bay to justify playing with Wilson again.

My current Six.One 95's are off on SW, static weight, and balance - even after being customized heavily.

I'm older than you are, but I also hit a one-handed backhand. Whenever I try a frame that's on the lighter side than I'm used to, my backhand and volleys are the first shots that lose their mojo. I enjoyed the old 6.1 Classics some years ago when I was more of a serve & volleyer, but I've found more control around the baseline with a softer alternative - evolving into more of an all-courter.

The Volkl C10 has been great for me, but the Organix 10 could be a smart one to check out, too (haven't tried it). I run my C10s with snug synthetic gut and they give me zero discomfort, even if I'm keeping a very busy schedule on the courts. They're a little peculiar, just because they have some flex in their hoops. Although they're a little bit "tip dead" this hasn't been a problem for me at all. As soon as I switched into this racquet, my strokes really came alive, but I've still enjoyed enough of that 6.1 sort of performance with these that I haven't missed those Wilsons at all since my switch.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but does a more flexible racket lend itself to more defensive and baseline oriented styles?? (i.e. Tomic, Djokovic, Hewitt, Ferrer)

In recent years I've developed into agressive baseliner, and I spend a good amount of time at the net. So, at this point I am wondering if switching to a more flexible frame will compromise my strengths as a player?

The Volkl C10 has been great for me, but the Organix 10 could be a smart one to check out, too (haven't tried it). I run my C10s with snug synthetic gut and they give me zero discomfort, even if I'm keeping a very busy schedule on the courts. They're a little peculiar, just because they have some flex in their hoops. Although they're a little bit "tip dead" this hasn't been a problem for me at all. As soon as I switched into this racquet, my strokes really came alive, but I've still enjoyed enough of that 6.1 sort of performance with these that I haven't missed those Wilsons at all since my switch.

Click to expand...

Played with the O10 325 with leather and og. Big sweetspot, very good vibration dampening, but the hoop seems a bit stiff. Solid on contact but comfortable. For the weight I expected more plowthrough. The C10 seems to be more powerful.

I am in need of some advice. I am a Div. III college player and I am thinking about switching to something more maneuverable. I also have had elbow problems, namely golfer's elbow. The golfer's elbow was the worst while I played with the Prestige MP, but is flaring up again.

This means abandoning my ol' faithful Wilson 6.1 95 16x18 and I've narrowed it down to three rackets (via play-testing, SW, other specs).

**I'll probably be adding weight to the handle to bring the balance to around 8pts HL

Correct me if I'm wrong, but does a more flexible racket lend itself to more defensive and baseline oriented styles?? (i.e. Tomic, Djokovic, Hewitt, Ferrer)

In recent years I've developed into agressive baseliner, and I spend a good amount of time at the net. So, at this point I am wondering if switching to a more flexible frame will compromise my strengths as a player?

Thanks again

Click to expand...

coming off GE (almost healed) and going with full syn gut 1st so can relate.

IME more flexible racquets can make it more difficult to put away the ball and yes one must play more defense at times. however if you're able to get to net then you're forcing the play. the dunlop 4D 100 (flex ~60 or so) is superb at volleys but somewhat lacking in pop when hitting ground strokes probably due to the 90 sq in head.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but does a more flexible racket lend itself to more defensive and baseline oriented styles?? (i.e. Tomic, Djokovic, Hewitt, Ferrer)

In recent years I've developed into agressive baseliner, and I spend a good amount of time at the net. So, at this point I am wondering if switching to a more flexible frame will compromise my strengths as a player?

Thanks again

Click to expand...

I suppose this depends on the specific racquet. Because the softer C10s gave me an instant boost in control from the back court, they helped me to hit more aggressively and still play around the net with a lot of authority - they're softer, but still rather hefty (and powerful). I needed to perpetually hold back to some degree with my 6.1 Classics to keep my strokes down on the court, so in my case, the extra control that I found with the softer racquets sort of enabled a more aggressive game.

No arguing with the snappy respose and volleying authority that comes with a stiffer frame (that also has the heft of a Six.One). I'd probably still use mine if I didn't get better control and consistency from a softer alternative. I think I offered the Volkl 10 series models for consideration because it sounds like you want that Wilson performance in a more arm-friendly layout.

coming off GE (almost healed) and going with full syn gut 1st so can relate.

IME more flexible racquets can make it more difficult to put away the ball and yes one must play more defense at times. however if you're able to get to net then you're forcing the play. the dunlop 4D 100 (flex ~60 or so) is superb at volleys but somewhat lacking in pop when hitting ground strokes probably due to the 90 sq in head.

Click to expand...

Very much agree with this observation - softer racquets without "enough" heft will play rather dead in contrast with stiffer frames. Although I'm enjoying more flexible gear these days, I need a minimum of 12.4-12.5 oz. heft with 9-10 pts. HL balance to feel like I can hit with some authority - but that's just me.

I've actually been curious to try one of the Dunlop 100's for a while, but I know that I'd need a good shot of lead on both the hoop and the handle of one of those to get it solid and stable for me. Although my old Yonex RQiS 1 Tour weighed 11.8 oz. stock, it was also rather soft and surprisingly dead for me until I leaded it up on both ends.

Very much agree with this observation - softer racquets without "enough" heft will play rather dead in contrast with stiffer frames. Although I'm enjoying more flexible gear these days, I need a minimum of 12.4-12.5 oz. heft with 9-10 pts. HL balance to feel like I can hit with some authority - but that's just me.

I've actually been curious to try one of the Dunlop 100's for a while, but I know that I'd need a good shot of lead on both the hoop and the handle of one of those to get it solid and stable for me. Although my old Yonex RQiS 1 Tour weighed 11.8 oz. stock, it was also rather soft and surprisingly dead for me until I leaded it up on both ends.

Click to expand...

apologies to the OP for the sidetrack but check the thread on the 100 series dunlop. got the 4D 100 leaded at 12 a bit (2-3 grams i recall) with lesser amount at 3&9. total weight with replacement grip ~ 12.3 oz. that cured the anemia for this player.

Sorry, I skipped most of the other posts.
I"m old, need something forgiving, and the Dunlop300T with 24" of lead at 10-2 is smooth, solid, no "twanging", and reliable.
The Bio3 with 16x18 feels like a toy, compared to the 18x20 pattern.
Just GOTTA string it at sub 50 tensions.

Serving with this stick definitely troubled the elbow, but my groundies felt superb. I love the access to spin and at net it was okay (I am sure it would be much better at around 8PTS HL).

What do you guys think about the Graphene Speed MP?

Click to expand...

Volleys are the GSMP's best asset; you can get good depth with topspin, and slice can be good, depending on technique. Serving is where I'm having an issue. I can't seem to hit a good, flat serve, and I'm hitting too many first serves into the net (read: no gimmees on serve). I'll continue to give it a shot, but I have Volkl Organix 7 (310), Blade 104, and 2012 BPD on the way.

apologies to the OP for the sidetrack but check the thread on the 100 series dunlop. got the 4D 100 leaded at 12 a bit (2-3 grams i recall) with lesser amount at 3&9. total weight with replacement grip ~ 12.3 oz. that cured the anemia for this player.

speaking of yonex, got an rdis200 mp that plays well stock.

Click to expand...

Interesting stuff, thanks.

Figured that our tangent had a little bit of a connection to the original thread in terms of what's potentially helpful for a one-hander, etc. Hope our OP doesn't mind a tangent or two as long as we're still talking racquets.

Volleys are the GSMP's best asset; you can get good depth with topspin, and slice can be good, depending on technique. Serving is where I'm having an issue. I can't seem to hit a good, flat serve, and I'm hitting too many first serves into the net (read: no gimmees on serve). I'll continue to give it a shot, but I have Volkl Organix 7 (310), Blade 104, and 2012 BPD on the way.

Click to expand...

I tried the GSpeed MP and the Blade 104 yesterday and the 104 was much better for me. Serves were more accurate.

I tried the GSpeed MP and the Blade 104 yesterday and the 104 was much better for me. Serves were more accurate.

Click to expand...

Thanks, Jack; I'm getting frustrated trying to find the right combo and amount of lead tape in the head/ handle, and nothing has worked great for me yet. I look forward my Bade 104 demo later this week!

Thanks, Jack; I'm getting frustrated trying to find the right combo and amount of lead tape in the head/ handle, and nothing has worked great for me yet. I look forward my Blade 104 demo later this week!

Click to expand...

I would start it out with 4" strips at 3/9 and 12'. That will bring it up to around a 325 swingweight. IMO it's too light and unstable in stock form.

I would start it out with 4" strips at 3/9 and 12'. That will bring it up to around a 325 swingweight. IMO it's too light and unstable in stock form.

Click to expand...

Jack, with that set up, i would think the balance is about even. Are you adding any weight to the Handle to counter balance? Have you tried just adding weight to the handle to bring up static weight without increasing sw that much?

(Sorry op for the off topic post. However FWIW, I found the 104 to be surprisingly good for a one handed backhand)

1-Keep playing with the BLX (2010 -- not 2012!) and put soft multis in it, in thinner gauges. I had a tennis elbow last summer and that's what I did. (Check my signature for a low-powered, ultra-comfortable setup.) I've never had better 1-hand BH than with this racquet.

2- Volkl C10 Pro. Almost exact same specs as the six one, but more maneuverable, and VERY comfortable, even with polys. You'll need a slight adjustment from your six one, but not that much.

3- About the Radical Pro (in your list): I found that adding 20 grams in the handle (either by choosing a smaller grip and adding a heat-shrink sleeve, or by putting a leather grip + overgrip) makes it almost identical to the six one 95 in terms of weight and balance. The racquet is more flexy and comfortable, but not as much as the C10 Pro.

4- Head Extreme Pro 2.0. Weird suggestion, you might think. But I swear, yo can go from the six one to this racquet in a middle of a match and you'll be fine (almost). Despite the difference in head size, they play similar and the Head is just as much precise. And don't be fooled by the stifness rating, it's a very comfortable frame. Night and day compared to the previous model.

I also have golfers elbow and hit a one hander. I am getting on Monday a Pro Kennex Q5 295. In your case, considering you llike heavier frames, you can check out the Q5 325 model. Both have kinetic technology. Pro Kennex claims there rackets help reduce or eliminate tennis elbow and in their webpage they present two scientific studies done by an american and german scientific institute that back up these claims.

1-Keep playing with the BLX (2010 -- not 2012!) and put soft multis in it, in thinner gauges. I had a tennis elbow last summer and that's what I did. (Check my signature for a low-powered, ultra-comfortable setup.) I've never had better 1-hand BH than with this racquet.

2- Volkl C10 Pro. Almost exact same specs as the six one, but more maneuverable, and VERY comfortable, even with polys. You'll need a slight adjustment from your six one, but not that much.

3- About the Radical Pro (in your list): I found that adding 20 grams in the handle (either by choosing a smaller grip and adding a heat-shrink sleeve, or by putting a leather grip + overgrip) makes it almost identical to the six one 95 in terms of weight and balance. The racquet is more flexy and comfortable, but not as much as the C10 Pro.

4- Head Extreme Pro 2.0. Weird suggestion, you might think. But I swear, yo can go from the six one to this racquet in a middle of a match and you'll be fine (almost). Despite the difference in head size, they play similar and the Head is just as much precise. And don't be fooled by the stifness rating, it's a very comfortable frame. Night and day compared to the previous model.

Click to expand...

Thanks for the input. I will try out the Radical Pro, I think that could work for sure.

What do you all think about the HEAD Speed IG 300? It has a flex of 60 RA and I could add weight to the handle to bring the balance to around 8pts HL

For your arm, you need two things above all else (in addition to good technique): Heavy frame, and soft strings. For this reason, I would go with the six one 2012. This model is slightly more powerful than your BLX (2010) version, so that makes it the perfect racquet to use with a soft, low-powered multi like Rip control 16 or anything else you like.

Don't be fooled by the so-called ''control'' attribute of polys, they're much more powerful strings than most people say. And I find them too lively in this Wilson model.

The Head is not a bad choice either, and would be even softer for your arm. It's a bit less powerful than the Wilson, so you could also drop the tension, which is also good in your situation.

I suppose this depends on the specific racquet. Because the softer C10s gave me an instant boost in control from the back court, they helped me to hit more aggressively and still play around the net with a lot of authority - they're softer, but still rather hefty (and powerful). I needed to perpetually hold back to some degree with my 6.1 Classics to keep my strokes down on the court, so in my case, the extra control that I found with the softer racquets sort of enabled a more aggressive game.

No arguing with the snappy respose and volleying authority that comes with a stiffer frame (that also has the heft of a Six.One). I'd probably still use mine if I didn't get better control and consistency from a softer alternative. I think I offered the Volkl 10 series models for consideration because it sounds like you want that Wilson performance in a more arm-friendly layout.

Click to expand...

This is why I went Volkl. The stiff Wilson stuff has its fun moments, but longterm negative pains. The Volkl let me swing out, so I had more real-world control and didn't have to worry about restraint so much.

I wouldn't get uptight about the lesser flex. It's not much difference, in practical terms. I remember seeing the math on these things and it's irrelevant in terms of your ball's pace.

I haven't played with any versions of the Speed, but of the others, the Radical Pro is the "softest", IMO.

I can echo DonDiego comments on the BLX 6.1 95 16x18 and the Head Extreme Pro 2.0. Those racquets aren't nearly as different as the specs might suggest. The XP2.0 does not feel any stiffer than the 6.1 95 despite the ratings. I actually preferred the XP2.0 in that regard. Both are excellent racquets though.

Everyone has their own likes and dislikes, but I liked the BLX 6.1 95 better than the the Radical or the Prestige.

I'd say the IG speed 300 is a good platform for u.
1) The racket feels comfortable even with full poly
2) Since the new version is up you can get it dirt cheap
3)the beam is really thin wich feels good when hitting a 1 hander.
4) The racket actually features good control even tho it is a 100 square inch head.
You will need some weight to make it more stable but then it's golden!
Just my 2 cents

I guess at this point the only thing holding me back is HEAD's inconsistency with design. I'm just confused as to why HEAD keeps changing the Speed mold. It seems that HEAD doesn't like to change their molds unless a racket does poorly on the market. However, with the rise of djokovic and his endorsement of the speed line, I don't see any reason to change the mold they had last year.

Maybe I'm just thinking about this too much, do you all have any knowledge about the new mold?