“But for other reasons also it is of importance
that I should have some knowledge of this man. For if I know that
in those things concerning which it cannot be doubted that they are
good, he is faultless and irreproachable,—that is to say, if he
is sober, merciful, upright, gentle, and humane, which no one doubts to
be good qualities,—then it will seem to be fitting, that upon him
who possesses these good virtues, that which is lacking of faith and
knowledge should be conferred; and so his life, which is in other
respects worthy of approbation, should be amended in those points in
which it shall appear to be imperfect. But if he remains wrapped
up and polluted in those sins which are manifestly such, it does not
become me to speak to him at all of the more secret and sacred things
of divine knowledge, but rather to protest and confront him, that he
cease from sin, and cleanse his actions from vice. But if he
insinuate himself, and lead us on to speak what he, while he acts
improperly, ought not to hear, it will be our part to parry him
cautiously. For not to answer him at all does not seem proper,
for the sake of the hearers, lest haply they may think that we decline
the contest through want of ability to answer him, and so their faith
may be injured through their misunderstanding of our
purpose.”