She emailed me to say she is outraged at A&E for the hypocrisy here, for the things that they air on their program that she finds offensive, yet A&E doesn't fire a star or somebody involved in their programming based on what they said but they would when it comes to Phil on Duck Dynasty and this friend, she said that she would boycott A&E and that network, and uh, um, she's not the only one

Anyone want to try parsing this word salad for me?

Oh and speaking of hypocrisy, you know who else got fired for things they said?

Keep laughing about Sarah Palin, but when it really comes down to it, half this country buys into the shiat you're laughing about. Oh sure, they might agree that she's ridiculous and kind of a characterture, but the issues she's supposedly being lampooned over are real: hatred of the poor, mistrust of government, especially taxation, drilling for oil, "foreign policy" towards Arabs or Muslims, gay rights, workers' rights, right-wing traditional values.

Buffoon or not, there are many who have conservative leanings towards these things, and that mindset is hardly going away. Also, this buffoon almost became one heart beat away from President. That means she got a lot of support in 2008.

I have a casual acquaintance who I recently discovered has been using me as the "friend" in his "some of my best friends are gay" argument for years.

I discovered his posting name on one of those Freep-like message boards. Even though he's one of the more odious human beings fate has ever forced me to cross paths with, his handle insists that we're BFF's and I'm his undisputed window into the rainbow-colored world of male effeminacy. There are enough identifying marks in his semiliterate rambles to indicate that I'm the one he's using for verisimilitude.

It's weird being used as a body shield like that, without even knowing it. Someone out there is openly spreading hateful remarks and epithetical language, and claiming that it's perfectly okay because I'm sometimes in the same building as him and know his first name. Part of me really wants to get an account and blow his little charade out of the water, but I doubt it would last.

Sarah Palin strikes me as the sort of person who won't let her kids hang out with gay people because she's afraid they might get gay on them. I'm sure she does have a gay friend somewhere - statistics support it - but I doubt he's enjoying being used as her buffer zone.

I had a black friend for a while, he was pissed off too. I really used to enjoy calling him up to ask about whatever new thing the blacks were up to at the time. Like: "Hey Marquillis (he said his name was just Mark because he was embarrassed about his real black name, so I just guessed a new name every time I called) what are you guys up to with this twerking thing? You've whored up Hannah Montana!" We were good friends, but he had a lot of anger and eventually stopped talking to me. I mean, he was one of the good ones and it makes me wonder if there really is no hope for us and them to ever get along.

No. Sarah Palin has discovered that she doesn't have to actually say anything, she just needs to string together words long enough for whoever's "interviewing" her to nod and it'll be taken as something uttered in English that deserves consideration by someone with a central nervous system. She realizes that she doesn't need to actually use language anymore.

Firstly, Sarah Palin is a hack even amongst hack politicians. This is an amateur political move. She knows bigotry against homosexuals is wrong and needs a cover to defend her viewpoint. This "friend" is political cover for when she and her army of Ayn Rand cultist stooges finally get called out for what they are which is to say anti-American, anti-liberty, pro-Big Government bigots. This "friend" is there to somehow show the world that she was never actually a bigot, she was just simply listening to the one homosexual "friend" that she knew to inform her viewpoint which may or may not be now actually considered a bigoted, because really it was never her viewpoint it belonged to her "friend".

Secondly, Phil Robertson and his clan are KLAN. These arsehats are the same people who terrorized the South in my parents' generation wearing sheets andburning crosses to get their message across, and don't worry, they'll remember where they left the hoods and torches here soon enough. The conservative movement, and forgive me for Godwinning the thread but in my honest opinion its not being thrown out as a slur but as a direct historical comparison, have become Nazis. They want a racialy and spiritual pure nation where government is an omniscient presence to preserve order in such a way so as to promote only one race, one gender, and one pure vision of morality. All other ideologies are impure and must be destroyed and anyone who voices something different whether they be rich or poor is acting against the collective whole. For them there can be no moderation, no equivocation, only the pure truth as they interpret it and as is explained to them by the party.

These guys left the annoying fringe territory long ago and as a Southerner scare the holy shiat out of me. Every year these guys get louder and louder and twist the truth with manufactured bandwagon reasoning the same way the National Socialists did in the lead up to Germany's last free election pre-Reichstag fire. Something, someone, somewhere needs to really stand up to these "people" and call them out for what they are before we wake up and start realizing we're living in a truly dystopian future a la "A Handmaid's Tale".

I should clarify however, I don't think this is as much a problem in the North as it is here in the South. These people have seized control of nearly every Southern state to the near total exclusion of all other political view points. The only holdouts are the cities, which make up substantially less of the population in the South as opposed to the North, and which are now being demonized in the state legislatures as anti-Chrisitan, refuges for illegal elements such as immigrants and "socialists".

I'm not trying to sound overly shrill or paranoid but when you look at the all the pieces that sum up the whole, hatred (not disagreement but hatred) of liberals, revisionist history of a better white America, revisionist history of a better "Christian" America, and really really big on the right to own, carry anywhere, and use assault style weapons, then it really begins to look like a create of TNT next to trash fire. You hope it doesn't go off but bets against are pretty long odds.

"I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person," Robertson is quoted in GQ. "Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I'm with the blacks, because we're white trash. We're going across the field.... They're singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, 'I tell you what: These doggone white people'-not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues." --A&E star Phil Robertson Jim Crow laws timeline:

"I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person," Robertson is quoted in GQ. "Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I'm with the blacks, because we're white trash. We're going across the field.... They're singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, 'I tell you what: These doggone white people'-not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues." --A&E star Phil Robertson

Yeah, because when black people under Jim Crow were complaining about how awful they were being treated by the white establishment, they'd be sure to do it within earshot of another white person.

"I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person," Robertson is quoted in GQ. "Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I'm with the blacks, because we're white trash. We're going across the field.... They're singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, 'I tell you what: These doggone white people'-not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues." --A&E star Phil Robertson

Yeah, because when black people under Jim Crow were complaining about how awful they were being treated by the white establishment, they'd be sure to do it within earshot of another white person.

And the guy from Douche Dynasty is not smart enough to even consider this fact by himself, I wonder if someone brought this up to him if he would have an epiphany.

"I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person," Robertson is quoted in GQ. "Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I'm with the blacks, because we're white trash. We're going across the field.... They're singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, 'I tell you what: These doggone white people'-not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues." --A&E star Phil Robertson

JohnnyC:I'll give Sarah Palin one thing... She has managed to get people to listen to her incessant squawking for much longer than they should have. I'm not sure if it is the vapid willful ignorance or the grossly obvious attempts at pandering, but she sure does manage to turn up the noise in just the right way so she can get some attention.

Since she got thrust into the spotlight by John McCain, she's devoted herself to telling stupid brain-dead bigots what they want to hear. Nobody ever went broke doing that.

No. Sarah Palin has discovered that she doesn't have to actually say anything, she just needs to string together words long enough for whoever's "interviewing" her to nod and it'll be taken as something uttered in English that deserves consideration by someone with a central nervous system. She realizes that she doesn't need to actually use language anymore.

spongeboob:"She emailed me to say she is outraged at A&E for the hypocrisy here, for the things that they air on their program that she finds offensive, yet A&E doesn't fire a star or somebody involved in their programming based on what they said but they would when it comes to Phil on Duck Dynasty and this friend, she said that she would boycott A&E and that network, and uh, um, she's not the only one," Palin said.

Has Sarah ever said something that was not a word salad?

And what exactly does her friend find objectionable to on A&E's programming?

I'm wondering the same thing. But I'm guessing this "friend" is about as real as Michelle Bachmann's "vaccine caused autism" mother.

she is one of my best friends who happens to have made a choice that isn't a choice that I have made

Did your gay friend tell you that her sexuality was a choice that she made, Sarah? Yeah, I didn't think so. You don't have a gay friend, you met a lesbian once 30 years ago and have been making shiat up about her to serve your own rhetoric ever since.

"She emailed me to say she is outraged at A&E for the hypocrisy here, for the things that they air on their program that she finds offensive, yet A&E doesn't fire a star or somebody involved in their programming based on what they said but they would when it comes to Phil on Duck Dynasty and this friend, she said that she would boycott A&E and that network, and uh, um, she's not the only one," Palin said.

Has Sarah ever said something that was not a word salad?

And what exactly does her friend find objectionable to on A&E's programming?

whcrow:spongeboob: whcrow: So you are saying you are a racist. You seem to be a racist to me.Please show me the posts where i appear racist.

The only one making a big deal about what I've posted about my experiences and my family origins is you. You seem to have some latent racist tendency that won't let you accept someone has experienced something different than you. Because in your mind because you are racist it's impossible for someone else not to be. Everyone has to take on the way you think. You can't stand the fact that someone is different from you. That difference makes you nervous because deep down you hate everyone. You can't stand that someone on the other side of your political agenda is comfortable with black blood running thru their veins.Pretty pathetic really, I feel sorry for you.

"I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person," Robertson is quoted in GQ. "Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I'm with the blacks, because we're white trash. We're going across the field.... They're singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, 'I tell you what: These doggone white people'-not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues." --A&E star Phil Robertson

Yeah, because when black people under Jim Crow were complaining about how awful they were being treated by the white establishment, they'd be sure to do it within earshot of another white person.

It's hard for people that grew up being racist in the city to accept there were/are places where it's not a problem.

Okay I just got back to this thread. First you wanted to play the whole marriage is a religious institution game and I'm okay with that. I f you look at it from a very short sighted narrow minded way yep that can be an issue. Not really when taken in context with the meaning of marriage from a stand point of the civil law but okay you get half a point of credibility on that one.

The racist stuff about how its just about where you grew up is Racist Conservative Revisionist History 101 bs. It was a problem everywhere. I AM FROM THE SOUTH. MY FAMILY IS FROM THE SOUTH. Was there clear economic racism in the cities. Absolutely. But black people weren't being hung from the lampposts on 12th and Porter in downtown they were being hung out in the woods by redneck scum. Even today people who I know in law school who are normally completely nice rational people about everything else, hate black people because they are from BFE Tennessee and if people didn't look down on them so much for it they might still be lynching them.

Robertsons comments are an insult to the millions of Southerners who worked to end Jim Crow. Im not saying millions worked for equal rights or integration but the system of laws as they stood were an anathema to the moral sensibilities of many.

The truth of racism in the South that Robertson doesn't want to admit to is that white people were not asked to sit at the back of the bus. White people were not discriminated against and intimated away from polling places. White people were not being hung by their neighbors or hiding in terror from burning crosses on their lawns. Robertson's comment on race should have kept him off the air, or at least any reputable channel, permanently.

wellreadneck:Why would anyone defend a group who implicity agrees with the death penalty for homosexuals with the approval of the Khomeini regime yet rail against this man? Partisan politics, that's why. Anything for a vote.

Where did these people say they believed in the death penalty for homosexuals or supported Iran's current regime? If anything this person was demonstrating beyond the stereotype that Muslims have to be rigid fundamentalists which is why Lowes was pressured to cut its sponsorship by conservative groups.

So your fight is with the church's and not with the laws, they are two different things. The laws are what is keeping gays from having the same rights as straights. The church has nothing to do with income tax status, with hospital visitation, etc. Now granted their is so called religious lobby to the govt that has the same confusion you do about what the real problem is, if I was religious I would be pissed off at them as well.

No people want to be married, they can be married by a justice of the peace, they are not suing churches to marry them they want to be married, why not give them the same term and same privledges as you do heterosexual couples who get married.

And you do know that the people fighting marriage equality are what 99-100% doing it for religious reasons, the churches declared war on Gays not the other way around.

Hospital visiting you run right up against Religious hospitals and religious people saying that allowing gays to visit their loved ones is infringing on their right to keep them separate because it is against their religion.

But you know what I am thinking you are just throwing shiat at this point.

whcrow:It appears to me that they want to go thru the marriage rite of the religions to obtain the right of being a mate.

Now I'm sure there is a subset that is religious and actually wants the rite status but that's a whole different battle.

Why do you think it's just a subset? Gay people, who want a church wedding usually want it because they are religious, in my experience. Non-religious gay people usually don't give a crap about churches, temples or mosques.

whcrow:spongeboob: whcrow: My question and I'm not religious I would say I was reluctant agnostic is why attack the church's?

Who the hell is attacking churches?

It appears to me that they want to go thru the marriage rite of the religions to obtain the right of being a mate.

Now I'm sure there is a subset that is religious and actually wants the rite status but that's a whole different battle.

No they just want to be able to be married they same as straight people, but you sound like they should be happy with civil unions, that is you seem to be okay with separate but equal, which with your other posts about race in the south I should have known that.

whcrow:Phil McKraken: whcrow: Phil McKraken: Alphakronik: When someone tells you they have a "gay friend" or a "black friend", what they are really saying is that there is one person of that group they can actually tolerate.

Disagree. They are engaging in tokenism. Being a racist makes one unpopular with a lot of people, but that one ____ friend which you claim to have is evidence otherwise. Who is Sarah Palin's gay friend? Katie Couric should investigate.

I think it would be a lot easier if they put a star on their forehead or something. I'm sure I work with people that are gay I've just never really worried about it and never walked up to them and ask them if they are gay. Should I, or should I just continue to treat them like I treat everyone else? I have one token, a good friend that was married had kids and then decided to come out, still my friend. I guess my token.

Your friend is a token if you happen to mention him/her in conversations about denying marriage equality but don't want to appear to be a bigot at the same time.

So here's my take on it. Marriage is a rite not a right.

Somewhere along the line the govt. got involved in it and marriage became a legal status.

Now should we recognize the significant other of a relationship with equal status as we do a "marriage"? should gay couples get the same tax breaks, some visitation rights in hospitals, same status for insurance, same everything in a legal status? the answer is a big "YES". They need to change Marriage status to Mate status.

My question and I'm not religious I would say I was reluctant agnostic is why attack the church's? the real enemy is the govt. and the laws.

Basically - once again, we've screwed up the separation of church and state. "Marriage" as a religious rite should be separate from "marriage" as a legal status administered by the state - and, at one time, they were. But, we've somehow equated the two, to the point where religion is dictating what government should and shouldn't allow. That's the real problem.

It's not just the idea of same-sex marriages - why are group marriage arrangements, such as polygamy, illegal? We allow relationships between corporations that would be considered a stoning offense had they been created between persons. As long as you're all genetically compatible, of sound mind and free will, why in the hell should the government make any form of marriage illegal?

Religion? Sure. Your religion, at that point, could easily limit (or not limit) your relationships any way that your religion saw fit, because they would be performing a rite, not administering a legal status. If you didn't like the limits placed on you by your religion, you could still change your legal status through secular means even as you fought to change your religion's limits. And, conversely, your religion wouldn't limit the rights of non-members by exploiting the state's close relationship with it to control the administration of that legal status.

It's not a hard problem to solve, and we already have the tools in place to solve it. Separation of church and state, marriage licenses, justices of the peace, etc., etc.

A sermon from 2010 says otherwise:Women exchange natural relations and were inflamed with lust for one another. And the men were inflamed with lust for each other. And they received in themselves the due penalty for their perversions. They're full of murder, envy, strife and hatred. They are insolent, arrogant, God-haters. They are heartless. They are senseless. They are faithless. They are ruthless! They invent ways of doing evil!

cameroncrazy1984:whidbey: Buffoon or not, there are many who have conservative leanings towards these things, and that mindset is hardly going away. Also, this buffoon almost became one heart beat away from President. That means she got a lot of support in 2008.

The influence of her and people like her is definitely going away. She may have gotten a lot of support in 2008, but there's a reason she didn't run in 2012 and won't run in 2016, not to mention a reason that the candidates she endorsed by-and-large lost their respective elections; she'll continue to decline in support and people she endorses will continue to lose elections.

I hope so. It's also more likely that big money will be pumped into setting up another charismatic candidate type who continues to tout the values she's hawking. It's not the person, it's the collective ideology that continues to thrive.

whidbey:Buffoon or not, there are many who have conservative leanings towards these things, and that mindset is hardly going away. Also, this buffoon almost became one heart beat away from President. That means she got a lot of support in 2008.

The influence of her and people like her is definitely going away. She may have gotten a lot of support in 2008, but there's a reason she didn't run in 2012 and won't run in 2016, not to mention a reason that the candidates she endorsed by-and-large lost their respective elections; she'll continue to decline in support and people she endorses will continue to lose elections.

Pubby:Firstly, Sarah Palin is a hack even amongst hack politicians. This is an amateur political move. She knows bigotry against homosexuals is wrong and needs a cover to defend her viewpoint. This "friend" is political cover for when she and her army of Ayn Rand cultist stooges finally get called out for what they are which is to say anti-American, anti-liberty, pro-Big Government bigots. This "friend" is there to somehow show the world that she was never actually a bigot, she was just simply listening to the one homosexual "friend" that she knew to inform her viewpoint which may or may not be now actually considered a bigoted, because really it was never her viewpoint it belonged to her "friend".

Secondly, Phil Robertson and his clan are KLAN. These arsehats are the same people who terrorized the South in my parents' generation wearing sheets andburning crosses to get their message across, and don't worry, they'll remember where they left the hoods and torches here soon enough. The conservative movement, and forgive me for Godwinning the thread but in my honest opinion its not being thrown out as a slur but as a direct historical comparison, have become Nazis. They want a racialy and spiritual pure nation where government is an omniscient presence to preserve order in such a way so as to promote only one race, one gender, and one pure vision of morality. All other ideologies are impure and must be destroyed and anyone who voices something different whether they be rich or poor is acting against the collective whole. For them there can be no moderation, no equivocation, only the pure truth as they interpret it and as is explained to them by the party.

These guys left the annoying fringe territory long ago and as a Southerner scare the holy shiat out of me. Every year these guys get louder and louder and twist the truth with manufactured bandwagon reasoning the same way the National Socialists did in the lead up to Germany's last free election pre-Reichstag fire. Someth ...

I don't think that Robertson is a racist or bigot. From what I have read, he and his family have been in entertainment for a while, and they just seem to be playing characters that they created for the show. And while I do believe what you say is going on in the south is true, I have seen it in the North also, That isn't Robertson. What Robertson is is a scumbag that would use bigotry and racial hatred to line his pockets with money. He knew what he said would cause outrage and controversy, and he knew the mouth breathers would flock to his show and buy the shows products, even if they knew about him before or not, because they think that he is one of them and they have to defend him. And that is just as bad as being a racist and bigot.

whcrow:Phil McKraken: Alphakronik: When someone tells you they have a "gay friend" or a "black friend", what they are really saying is that there is one person of that group they can actually tolerate.

Disagree. They are engaging in tokenism. Being a racist makes one unpopular with a lot of people, but that one ____ friend which you claim to have is evidence otherwise. Who is Sarah Palin's gay friend? Katie Couric should investigate.

I think it would be a lot easier if they put a star on their forehead or something. I'm sure I work with people that are gay I've just never really worried about it and never walked up to them and ask them if they are gay. Should I, or should I just continue to treat them like I treat everyone else? I have one token, a good friend that was married had kids and then decided to come out, still my friend. I guess my token.

Your friend is a token if you happen to mention him/her in conversations about denying marriage equality but don't want to appear to be a bigot at the same time.

Alphakronik:When someone tells you they have a "gay friend" or a "black friend", what they are really saying is that there is one person of that group they can actually tolerate.

Disagree. They are engaging in tokenism. Being a racist makes one unpopular with a lot of people, but that one ____ friend which you claim to have is evidence otherwise. Who is Sarah Palin's gay friend? Katie Couric should investigate.

eddiesocket:BMulligan: eddiesocket: TheGregiss: Because he didn't mention Jim Crow of the Civil Rights act at all. He said that blacks were much happier "pre welfare and entitlements" which is standard boilerplate Conservative talking points that don't mean anything.

BMulligan:eddiesocket: TheGregiss: Guy states his preference for vaginal intercourse over anal and everyone flips their shiat.

Yep, that's the sum total of what he said about homosexuality. Didn't say anything else at all. You nailed it. You really should change your name to Honest Gregiss, on account of how totally honest you are.

The poster does have a point, though, lurking there behind his or her heeby-jeebies over the subject of buttsex. Why were Duck Dude's comments about the Civil Rights Act generally ignored? That strikes me as odd.

Because he didn't mention Jim Crow of the Civil Rights act at all. He said that blacks were much happier "pre welfare and entitlements" which is standard boilerplate Conservative talking points that don't mean anything.

eddiesocket:TheGregiss: Guy states his preference for vaginal intercourse over anal and everyone flips their shiat.

Yep, that's the sum total of what he said about homosexuality. Didn't say anything else at all. You nailed it. You really should change your name to Honest Gregiss, on account of how totally honest you are.

The poster does have a point, though, lurking there behind his or her heeby-jeebies over the subject of buttsex. Why were Duck Dude's comments about the Civil Rights Act generally ignored? That strikes me as odd.

Do the repeated references to "she" not count? As for the name, would you feed somebody of your acquaintance to the kind of howling mob that goes after even Democrats who violate the liberal speech code? People who feel it's appropriate to threaten you with rape and/or death and to hound you out of your job and destroy your career and life for tweeting, "I hope I don't get aids. Just kidding, I'm White".

ALL GIRLS AGREE TO PULL PANTIES DOWN:rynthetyn: If anyone I know ever tried to use the, "I have a gay friend," defense against charges for bigotry, I'd be calling a press conference to denounce them that very day.

If you want to read the lesbian equivalent to that guy "shooting starbursts into a crusty sock," Camille Paglia's totally obvious dyke-crush on Sarah Palin is ridiculous.

She even PRAISES Sarah Palin's innate ability to slaughter the English language:

"She uses language with the jumps, breaks and rippling momentum of a be-bop saxophonist."

Camille Paglia is tiresome. I'm pretty sure she just takes whatever position is directly opposite what the liberal establishment happens to think. Of course that means praising Sarah Palin, what would get her more attention?

/pretty sure the only reason Paglia hasn't married a guy for attention whoring purposes is because nobody wants her

No. Sarah Palin has discovered that she doesn't have to actually say anything, she just needs to string together words long enough for whoever's "interviewing" her to nod and it'll be taken as something uttered in English that deserves consideration by someone with a central nervous system. She realizes that she doesn't need to actually use language anymore.

That's the best explanation I've seen thus far.

Except for the "discovered" part. Palin never actually "discovered" anything in her life.

So... you're saying that Sarah Palin's prominence in American society is due to the Clever Hans effect?

JohnnyC:I'll give Sarah Palin one thing... She has managed to get people to listen to her incessant squawking for much longer than they should have. I'm not sure if it is the vapid willful ignorance or the grossly obvious attempts at pandering, but she sure does manage to turn up the noise in just the right way so she can get some attention.

Meh.. she's like Rush or Stern. People listen to them to be outraged. It's like riding a roller coaster or watching somebody slip on ice. Sarah says something stupid and lefties like to pretend that they're offended, but they're secretly happy she's so farking stupid and a figurehead of the retarded right, and then people on the right like to prop her up because they think she really gets under the skin of those marxists on the left, but that's only because they're too stupid to realize how meta it all really is.

In the end though, Sarah gets paid, and the more stupid situations she injects herself into, the more she gets paid. Much like Jessie Jackson, Donald Trump, Ann Coulter, Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian.

TheGregiss:Guy states his preference for vaginal intercourse over anal and everyone flips their shiat.

Yep, that's the sum total of what he said about homosexuality. Didn't say anything else at all. You nailed it. You really should change your name to Honest Gregiss, on account of how totally honest you are.

namatad:"It seems like, to me, a vagina -- as a man -- would be more desirable than a man's anus," he told the magazine. "That's just me. I'm just thinking: There's more there! She's got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I'm saying? But hey, sin: It's not logical, my man. It's just not logical."

LOLWUT????????????????

No dood, I have no idea what you are saying.Other than that you are a POS.DOOD, with a big family like yours, you know, the odds are pretty good that one of them is a homosexual!!You should go throw everyones googles search log until you find them!!

Guy states his preference for vaginal intercourse over anal and everyone flips their shiat.

No. Sarah Palin has discovered that she doesn't have to actually say anything, she just needs to string together words long enough for whoever's "interviewing" her to nod and it'll be taken as something uttered in English that deserves consideration by someone with a central nervous system. She realizes that she doesn't need to actually use language anymore.

That's the best explanation I've seen thus far.

I've got a better one for you. Sarah Palin is actually meow says the dog.

Sarah Palin does seem to give Greta a massive lady boner so you may well have something there.

After reading Palin's latest word salad juxtaposed alongside crazy Unka Phil's incoherent GQ rant in TFA I can at least take some solace in the fact that the pair of them never met up early on and had kids together.

Palin's gay friend is deeply offended by A&E's hypocrisy in refusing to fire any other reality-show start for 'offensive' speech.No gay-friend comment about A&E dumping Dog the Bounty Hunter after he went all Mel Gibson about Jews and not one Christian stood up to defend the Jews -OR- free speech, and Dog was brought back to resume taping a while later. Also no gay-friend comment about Dixie Chicks being erased from country music overnight when Christians sploded radio station phone lines with cries of 'traitor!!' and 'it's un-American to criticize President Bush!!'

Palin's gay friend is deeply offended by public speech condemning Duckblower's gentle humble spreading of the good news of Jesus Christ.But when it comes to preaching that gays are heartless, faithless, senseless, ruthless, America-destroying, family-killing, goat-farking plotters of evil, gay-friend is all totes McGotes.

Sarah Palin's gay friend is just Sarah Palin speaking her own opinion in third-person gay.

sparkeyjames:She's still fishing for another 15 minutes. The rubes seem to be willing to give it to her plus all their money. Nothing that comes out of her mouth is relevant. I say go back to Alaska. I don't care what you do there just go.

She's still fishing for another 15 minutes. The rubes seem to be willing to give it to her plus all their money. Nothing that comes out of her mouth is relevant. I say go back to Alaska. I don't care what you do there just go.

I personally believe that U.S. gays are unable to do so because, uh, some, uh, people out there in our nation don't have vaginas and, uh, I believe that our A&E like such as in San Francisco and uh, the France, everywhere like such as, and, I believe that they should, our A&E over here in the U.S. should help the U.S., uh, or, uh, should help San Francisco and should help the France and the Euro countries so we will be able to build up our future for our children...

No. Sarah Palin has discovered that she doesn't have to actually say anything, she just needs to string together words long enough for whoever's "interviewing" her to nod and it'll be taken as something uttered in English that deserves consideration by someone with a central nervous system. She realizes that she doesn't need to actually use language anymore.

That's the best explanation I've seen thus far.

Except for the "discovered" part. Palin never actually "discovered" anything in her life.

spongeboob:"She emailed me to say she is outraged at A&E for the hypocrisy here, for the things that they air on their program that she finds offensive, yet A&E doesn't fire a star or somebody involved in their programming based on what they said but they would when it comes to Phil on Duck Dynasty and this friend, she said that she would boycott A&E and that network, and uh, um, she's not the only one," Palin said.

Has Sarah ever said something that was not a word salad?

And what exactly does her friend find objectionable to on A&E's programming?

Has this "friend" even complained to A&E, or contacted the appropriate anti-defamation organization to contact A&E? Or just sat there pouting and expected A&E to read her mind?

No. Sarah Palin has discovered that she doesn't have to actually say anything, she just needs to string together words long enough for whoever's "interviewing" her to nod and it'll be taken as something uttered in English that deserves consideration by someone with a central nervous system. She realizes that she doesn't need to actually use language anymore.

I was just going to post a picture of Darmok, but since this showed up as the 5th search result I have to go with it.

"It seems like, to me, a vagina -- as a man -- would be more desirable than a man's anus," he told the magazine. "That's just me. I'm just thinking: There's more there! She's got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I'm saying? But hey, sin: It's not logical, my man. It's just not logical."

LOLWUT????????????????

No dood, I have no idea what you are saying.Other than that you are a POS.DOOD, with a big family like yours, you know, the odds are pretty good that one of them is a homosexual!!You should go throw everyones googles search log until you find them!!