*bump*
Can we do something about the still-locked pages? Since joyride is
active again this part needs to be opened up too.
E.g., the 8.2 page should be made to include Activities/Etoys_(8.2)
instead of Activities/Etoys_(latest) so that we can get on with the
work.
- Bert -
On 28.09.2008, at 07:59, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> > wrote:
>> The lock-down of this page (which causes lock-down of all included
>> pages
>> transitively) was fine until Scott replaced the references to the 8.2
>> versions of activities with the old G1G1 page. E.g., when the page
>> was
>> locked, it included
>>>>http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(8.2)
>>>> which is okay to be pegged at v. 94.
>>>> But now it includes and locks down
>>>>http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Etoys_(latest)
>>>> which makes it impossible for me to update that page to v. 95 to
>> match the
>> latest joyride.
>>>> Please unlock as long as the page references the original G1G1
>> page. See
>> edit history at
>>>>http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/8.2>> I expect to refork the Activities/G1G1 page soon (probably as soon as
> we declare an 8.2 final). In the interim, it makes my life easier to
> both (a) have 8.2 point to G1G1, so I don't have to edit things in two
> places, and (b) have the 8.2 (and G1G1) page locked, so that I am
> certain I know what activity version changes are being
> proposed/tested. I don't expect this to last for long.
>> For now, can you either ask me via email or file a trac request
> assigned to me for the etoys update you'd like to make? You can also
> copy/paste the template into Activities/Joyride for now to get
> testing; that shouldn't be locked. Should the etoys update be
> considered if we made another release candidate? (I've noticed
> there's a new etoys RPM in joyride).
>> I know this is inconvenient, but if you can bear with me, it will make
> my life in the next week easier. You can transfer the inconvenience
> to me by making me update your activity info for you, and if that gets
> to be too much work it will motivate me to reconsider unprotecting the
> page to let you do it yourself. =)
> --scott
>> --
> ( http://cscott.net/ )