Thoughts on Life, Love, Politics, Hypocrisy and Coming Out in Mid-Life

Monday, May 14, 2018

Will Gerrymandering Backfire for Republicans in 2018?

For more than a half dozen years Republicans have held on to a majority in Congress and in many state legislatures through gerrymandering that carefully drew districts to ensure Republican majorities. But often, to maximize the number of districts with Republican majorities, the actual party majority in favor of Republicans was slim: 52 to 55% in numerous districts. In normal years, this thin majority was enough to allow Republicans to skate to easy victories. So far, 2018 is proving to NOT fall into the "normal year" category (neither did Virginia's 2017 election that saw 15 Republicans in the House of Delegates go down to defeat). As a story in Politico notes, Republicans may now be poised to lose a number of their thin majority districts as Democrats are energized and out to take revenge on Trump and the larger GOP. Here are story highlights:

Republicans
redrew congressional districts across the country in 2010 in an attempt to
consign Democrats to a semi-permanent House minority.

But in 2018, the
long-successful GOP insurance policy is at risk of backfiring in a big way —
not only carving a path for a takeover, but possibly allowing for bigger
Democratic gains.

In many states,
Republicans maximized gains in the House by spreading GOP voters across as many
districts as possible. Typically, that left Democrats with around 40 to 45
percent of the vote in those districts, making them difficult under normal
circumstances for the minority party to contest.

But this
election year is anything but normal. Many of the once-secure 55-45 Republican
districts are very much in play, even in states that have not had competitive
congressional races since 2012, the year new maps were installed. And North
Carolina and Ohio — where Democrats chose nominees in primaries on Tuesday —
are turning into the prime examples.

[A]
half-dozen Republican districts that could become fierce battlegrounds this
fall, including the fast-changing suburbs of Cincinnati, Charlotte, Columbus
and Raleigh. President Donald Trump won less than 55 percent of the vote in
each of the seats in 2016 — and some of the Republican incumbents have been caught
by surprise by the ferocity of their competition. . . . . “because of the way
the maps have been drawn and the environment that Republicans are facing, you
have a whole bunch of Republicans who have never been in a competitive race in
their life, who are running [in one] right now.”

“In
a normal year, you're safe in these seats, but in a time like this, Democrats
are within striking distance,” Jackson continued. “This is when gerrymandering
backfires.”

Pittenger’s
district [in North Carolina] could end up being the biggest gerrymandering
backfire of 2018. The Republican lost his primary Tuesday night to Mark Harris,
a conservative pastor who cast the three-term congressman as a part of the
“Washington swamp,” effectively tapping into the anti-establishment anger
driving the GOP base in a seat where Trump, Mitt Romney and John McCain all got
between 53 percent and 56 percent of the vote in recent presidential elections.

But Harris, who
lagged behind Pittenger in fundraising, now faces Democrat Dan McCready, a
veteran and businessman who has vowed not to support House Minority Leader
Nancy Pelosi for speaker and banked more than $1.2 million in cash on hand in
preparation for November. Harris’ campaign had $70,000, according to his
pre-primary FEC filing.

Trump won North
Carolina’s 9th District, which stretches from the Charlotte suburbs to
Fayetteville, with 53.5 percent of the vote in 2016. But the area is stocked
with suburban, college-educated voters — a cohort that trended away from
Republicans over the past year.

[I]ncumbents
in safely drawn seats can also be out of practice. “You win every two years,
and you put it on cruise control, then before you know it, you’re in an
environment you’re not ready for,” said Chip Gerhardt, a Republican consultant
in Ohio.

Let's hope the story proves right and many Republicans to their surprise go down to defeat.

Translate This Page

Contact Me to Order Title Work

LGBT Legal Services

About Me

Out gay attorney in a committed relationship; formerly married and father of three wonderful children; sometime activist and political/news junkie; survived coming out in mid-life and hope to share my experiences and reflections with others.
In the career/professional realm, I am affiliated with Caplan & Associates PC where I practice in the areas of real estate, estate planning (Wills, Trusts, Advanced Medical Directives, Financial Powers of Attorney, Durable Medical Powers of Attorney); business law and commercial transactions; formation of corporations and limited liability companies and legal services to the gay, lesbian and transgender community, including birth certificate amendment.

Disclaimer on Opinions and Content

This Blog contains content that may be innapropriate for readers under the legal age of 18. IF YOU ARE UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, PLEASE LEAVE NOW. Thank you

This is an opinion and commentary blog and the opinions and contents of this Blog - including opinions expressed concerning opponents of LGBT equality - are the opinions only of the individual blogger and should not be attributed to any other individuals or to any organization of which the blogger is a past or current member.

Followers

Michael-in-Norfolk disclaims any and all responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, reliability, operability, or availability of information or material displayed on this site and does not claim credit for any images or articles featured on this site, unless otherwise noted. All visual content is copyrighted to it's respectful owners. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies, and Michael-in-Norfolk does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. If you own rights to any of the images or articles, and do not wish them to appear on this site, please contact Michael-in-Norfolk via e-mail and they will be promptly removed. Michael-in-Norfolk contains links to other Internet sites. These links are provided solely as a convenience and are not endorsements of any products or services in such sites, and no information or content in such site has been endorsed or approved by this blog.