Tuesday, May 4, 2010

There are those films that you only look for a laugh and movies that you watch for the first risposte.I are "disposable that usually do not see more than once or twice, maybe with friends or in situations of party. For what I think, some of these films have the same fun value (eye at the end) of weepy melodrama and splatter in bad taste .

The latter, however, are those cult films that are maintained over time, are remembered because they mark the life of one who watches them. The experience of the viewer joins the film product creates a strong evento nella coscienza. Vedere un gran film ti cambia, è inevitabile. Non sei più la stessa persona .

This film is a classic example of " middle, a bit 'as it was with Truman Show. It has a side of pure entertainment with some really funny sequences ( "I really like Red Bull!" ) and a basic idea that excites the reflection. Summarizing at most, this is the story of one man who one day decided to change her life taken as the categorical imperative "is " in every situation imaginable. Wife new imported from abroad? It . Lessons of a useless language? It . Attending a sad Harry Potter themed party? Yes! No matter WHAT , you must accept.

It's actually very simple as the plot, we might recall the distant " Liar, liar " or " Bruce almighty ", always (in fact) with Jim Carrey in the lead roles, the mode of development of events, although in this case there is no magic background. The decision of character to say "yes" to everything that life has taken it knowingly, forcing its will and way of life radically changing . This is precisely the key to interpreting the intentions of this film mature. It differs substantively from the classic American comedies paradoxical by the fact that the events are, in a certain way, but nothing out of the ordinary is great. It is not forced by anyone, potrebbe scindere questo patto da un momento all'altro, non c'è nessun elemento esterno che lo obbliga, nessuna fidanzata lo lascia (oddio, in realtà si, però è fondamentale per acquistare la consapevolezza) e nessun bambino conta su di lui per avere nuovamente una famiglia riunita e felice.

Il protagonista prende in mano le redini della sua vita inconsapevole e, per viverla al meglio, si basa su un concetto , un'idea, seguendola ciecamente in un primo periodo, per poi interiorizzarla completamente in un secondo momento. Il “si” rientra nella definizione kantiana del termine “ formale ” indicando la modalità (accettare sempre) ma mai il content of the action to be taken, which varies in each case. This first moment of the life of Carl coincides with the first half of the film, where the protagonist makes the fundamental decision to become a YES MAN (away from its current state of NO MAN ) without even knowing what it is precisely because it requires a change of perspective.

Non vi nascondo che questo film mi è stato di grande aiuto, principalmente per quella che è stata la mia esperienza di vita , per cui la passione con cui ne parlo non è affatto “accademica” ma genuina e originaria. Spesso è facile ritrovarsi nelle situazioni di un film, magari dopo averlo visto, ci si fa una risata sopra. Yes Man è la fotocopia della mia vita. Non scherzo! Solo che, fortunatamente, I saw him after my direct personal film "and be left out of a situation NO MAN full-blown. Second part fully in the ethical issues that are usually dealt with in my studies in philosophy, in fact, the "step forward" were talking about is very similar to that exercised by the 'phenomenological ethics than Kantian . The merit of Husserl , father of phenomenology, in its "Lessons of formal ethics" , was to give meaning to existence. To fill again the content of moral action. does not make sense say yes to everything, that you understand very well the adventures / misadventures of Carl. And 'only the first step, however crucial to the openness to life, but you must complete this experience and become involved in their choices to the end, without being blinded by a principle, as "good" might be. I'm also talking of holy wars, fundamentalism and all those doctrines which close their eyes open instead of permanently. The ethics of choice is the film's end, as the final appearance of a long and arduous process that involves a strong-willed character that even a seemingly inept, like Carl is able to convey.

Jim Carrey, as always, manages to make us laugh (and long) but this time we talk about ourselves and how you can change without letting go. We report a sequence (please click!) , really funny, where the protagonist is being scolded just always been a "living dead .

.... is playing the "wedding list" for the reconstruction of Caniglia ... in s peranza that we all give u na hand / paw!!

to better see the listing .... ...... click on it ;-)

this is the updated table with the shares donated to the March 7, 2010 .. and that was addition also a new entry WORKS. We thought it could do it alone, but unfortunately it is more difficult than expected, and then with all the goodwill we can not and so we turn to professionals, whose cost is estimated at € 10,000.00!

In the first column of the table are the main items that are needed for the new kennels, near the quantity and its unit value .

last column is the value of a single dimension related to each item (for almost all items there are 100 shares, except one item which has 140 units!).

E 'can participate in the "wedding list" by making a deposit into account no Payable to THE Caniglia 402868/83 ABI 06230 CAB 02802 IBAN IT53X0623002802000040286883 or using key "donation" with PAYPAL ( button on the left side of our blog ) for the amount of one (or more) units of an item (or items) and indicate the reason for the payment of the item (or items) for which you made the payment -but any amount donation will be welcome .. there is so much to do as they say "everything is' soup ;-) - ... In this way you will be climbing through the entries and ... the kennel will be built better and faster!

... and so we can all say: "... and lived happily ever after!"

A heartfelt thanks for the great help they gave us: (for the generous donation we have associated "symbolic" one item of expenditure)