Does the Bell Toll For Gary Bettman Now?

When I opened up my morning copy of the Tennessean and saw the headline "Del Biaggio may have skirted full NHL review," that grabbed my attention. When I then saw a picture of NHL commissioner Gary Bettman underneath Boots Del Biaggio's, with the caption "may have given Del Biaggio special treatment," I had to sit down, because this looked the beginning of the end for Bettman's reign as commissioner. Major kudos, by the way, for Brad Schrade, the Tennessean writer who is leading the way with this story.

The main gist is that Doug Bergeron, who at one time was poised to invest in Del Biaggio's minority share, claims the following:

Bergeron said Del Biaggio told him in December that National Hockey League Commissioner Gary Bettman's office had given special permission for Del Biaggio to buy a share of the team without being subjected to all the scrutiny the league usually gives to prospective owners. Del Biaggio told him the commissioner's office did not require him to show audited financial statements before it approved him.
"Boots bragged to me that he was able to convince Bettman's office to overlook the need for his audited financial statements because it was too much work," Bergeron said.
Bettman himself told Bergeron that he helped arrange the agreement that Del Biaggio had with the Predators' local owners, Bergeron said.

There are really two big whammys here: the first, obviously, is that the NHL potentially took a shortcut with Del Biaggio's background check, a gaffe that is blowing up in the worst way possible. The second, however, speaks to Bettman's involvement, if not his seminal role, in the arrangement of a "put right", which requires a bit of explanation...

The "put right" (as found in the draft version of the ownership group's operating agreement) basically gives the Series A shareholder (Forecheck Holdings, Del Biaggio's investment firm) a way out of the Predators in the event that they were to buy into a different NHL team, get awarded an expansion NHL team, or if the rest of the ownership group failed financially, like going into default on loan payments. But come on, what kind of NHL owner would default on a loan, right? How wacky would that be?

Anyways, if Forecheck Holdings exercised that right, the rest of the ownership would be forced to buy out the Series A shares within 120 days. If they didn't, Forecheck would gain operational control of the team. Basically, this is a financial protection clause for Forecheck, offering them a way out if a majority ownership opportunity came along, or the Predators sank like a rock and failed to meet financial obligations.

Now remember, the story here is that Bergeron claims these two things, and that doesn't necessarily make them true (especially with Del Biaggio's credibility these days). The NHL responded in the piece by saying that Del Biaggio was "treated in a consistent manner as with the applications of other prospective owners," and David Freeman, the leader of the local ownership group, replied that the league office wasn't "involved in structuring it or developing it" with respect to the operating agreement and the put right.

If this is the truth, however, this could represent a situation that might finally bring about the fall of Gary Bettman, which some (especially hockey fans in Canada) have been awaiting for years. In yesterday's Globe and Mail, Stephen Brunt cut the commissioner some slack, writing that Del Biaggio had put Bettman in an "awkward position" after having backed him as a savior for Nashville while turning Jim Balsillie aside. He wrote,

After surely undertaking the necessary due diligence, Bettman must have believed that Del Biaggio offered the best chance to achieve his oft-stated goal: saving hockey in Nashville.

Today's story undercuts that charitable stance twice; firstly, by alleging that due diligence wasn't performed, and secondly, because Bettman knew of, and played a role in crafting, a mechanism by which Del Biaggio could assume control of the franchise. To many, pushing Jim Balsillie aside was bad enough. To do so without thoroughly vetting Del Biaggio, and to help structure an agreement that could result in an abrupt change of control like this, smacks of preferential treatment that would be hard to justify.

I can't wait to see how the hockey press eats this one up...

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Labels

Popular posts from this blog

To kick off this series of articles general sports-blogging articles here at OTF Classic, I think it's best to start with a comment that Brad left here last week, after I shared my goals for 2012, which include specific revenue targets:I considered diving into the world of internet marketing myself, but I felt that my friends would hate me for bugging them about stuff. I mean, it's pretty low-risk high-reward, so it's tempting. I wouldn't mind reading about tips on how to maximize impact of blogging in general to make it a legitimate income source.
Trying to make money at sports blogging can be a very touchy subject - for the vast majority of us, this is an activity we pursue to both exercise our creativity and share our love of the game, whether it's hockey, football, badminton, whatever, with fellow fans. Mixing that personal conversation with a commercial message can turn people off, especially if it becomes too intrusive for the reader.

A tireless refrain from the Canadian media is that Nashville is an absolute failure as a hockey market, and failing to move the team north of the border is an exercise in folly by the NHL.

Our latest exhibit comes from James Mirtle, usually one of the more thoughtful hockey bloggers extant:But Nashville, quite simply, has proven it cannot sustain an NHL hockey team. Even with the lowest ticket prices in the entire league (I know: I've looked into flying there for a game or two) and a ridiculously forgiving arena lease, the team has had attendance issues despite having one of the best records in the league.

It's not a matter of Canadians not wanting teams in the southern U.S.; I've argued time and again in favour of teams like Dallas and Tampa Bay that have supported their teams and really brought something to the table in terms of bringing news fans and new energy to the game. That's a good thing.

The Predators, however, are not that, not in the beginning and certainly no…

While working on a piece about the 10th anniversary of the great Colorado/Detroit game at Joe Louis Arena, I caught myself reflecting on some of the great games I've had the fortune of seeing in Detroit during the 1990's, through a variety of means. Then another thing came to mind - when I'm in attendance, the Red Wings win. I'm on a huge personal winning streak here, so perhaps the Red Wings front office would want to bolster their chances during the upcoming playoffs and make sure I'm in the house for those critical games? I can make myself available...

June 4, 1995: Detroit takes Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals from Chicago, 3-2 (although the Hawks put one of the goalpost as the final horn sounds). Wow, has it been that long since the Blackhawks achieved anything? Ticket courtesy of a college buddy who had a spare.

October 13, 1995: The Wings pummel the Edmonton Oilers in their home opener, 9-0. After the painful Finals sweep against New Jersey the…