Judaism is the only religion that have sex (thrusting their pelvis) when they pray to Goddess Shekinah.

1.PROBLEM 2.REACTION 3.SOLUTION.

The Elite Jews create the illness, then sell the Cure. They create Chaos & Terrorism, then sell the solution.

Problem, reaction, solution is a Jew conjuring trick within their forever wandering diaspora in order to play the victim, and influence global changes in laws to protect all their historic and contemporary lies ……Who still falls for this old Yiddish trick manipulating policy changes to hide and protect Jewish crimes, acting out Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution against the gentile, changes which gives (((them))) immunity when hiding the truth.

If I converted to Buddhism, does that make me Chinese? If I converted to Hinduism, does that make me Indian? When Khazarians (Mongol Turks) converted to Judaism in 740 BC and stole the true Negro Hebrew identity, and turned them into slaves... did that make the counterfeit Jews Hebrew? Well, the Jew World Order seems to think so. They crucified Jesus Christ for exposing them.

The invention of the Muslim Terrorist is the latest invention by the Jews, to spread fear and dismantle governments that are not yet puppets of the Jews...or have decided to stop serving the Jews.. justifying raping the World, and slaughtering billions of innocent genuine semite and gentile families in every country for power and control... under the illusion of Freedom and Democracy.

Why do Children go missing every year

The Invention of the word JEW

The word “Jew” is a relatively modern invention used, seemingly indiscriminately and interchangeably, by 18th century redactors to describe Israelites, Judahites and Judaeans. It first appeared in these eighteenth century Bibles and it first appears within these redactions in 2 Kings 16:6 …. in an episode that describes a war between Israel and Judah: when Rezin, king of Syria and Pekah, king of Israel went to war with wicked Ahaz, king of Judah. The Syrians “drove the Jews from Elath” who were in possession of it and so here is the first time that the inhabitants of the kingdom of Judah are called “Jews” when more properly they should be called Judahites. However, the point here is this: the very first time the word “Jew” is found in the modern Bible, they are at war with Israel.
Edomites are therefore descended from Edom (Esau) whose descendants later intermarried with the Turks to produce a Turco-Edomite mixture which later became known as Khazars. That is, most of today’s Jews are descendants of this interbreeding that produced a race called Khazars who had once governed an empire called Khazaria. Furthermore, this hybrid race Edomite/Turk/Khazar who created the Khazar kingdom and who between the seventh and ninth centuries AD, adopted the religion of Judaism. And, it is these Khazar Jews who are the ancestors of the vast majority of today’s Jewish people. That is, Edomite/Turk/Khazars are the ancestors of the modern “Jews” including the Torah-true and Zionist Jews who spuriously claim right to the land of Palestine claiming it it is theirs by biblical demands and ancestral rights.

Consequently, the majority of today’s Jewish people are known as “Jews” not because they are Judahites and descended from Jacob/Israel but because their Edomite/Turk/Khazar ancestors in their Kingdom of Khazaria adopted the religion of Judaism, called themselves “Jews” and arrogated the Birthright Promises and Bible Covenants belonging to the Israelites, but especially those belonging to the Judahites.

Thus, “Jews” are not Israelites and certainly they are not Judahites. Hence, modern Jews are not heir to the Bible Covenants nor to the ancient Nation of Israel given by Yahweh to the Israelites and the Judahites and so have no Divine Right or biblical mandate to the modern Land of Palestine.

Similarly, Jesus of Nazareth was not a “Jew” he was a Judahite, and Jesus Christ was not “King of the Jews.”

A devastating UN report into poverty in the UK provides incontrovertible evidence that the enemy of the British people is the very ruling class that has gone out of its way these past few years to convince them it is Russia.

Professor Philip Alston, in his capacity as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, spent two weeks touring the United Kingdom. He did so investigating the impact of eight years of one of the most extreme austerity programs among advanced G20 economies in response to the 2008 financial crash and subsequent global recession.

What he found was evidence of a systematic, wilful, concerted and brutal economic war unleashed by the country’s right-wing Tory establishment against the poorest and most vulnerable section of British society – upending the lives of millions of people who were not responsible for the aforementioned financial crash and recession but who have been forced to pay the price.

“It…seems patently unjust and contrary to British values that so many people are living in poverty. This is obvious to anyone who opens their eyes to see the immense growth in foodbanks and the queues waiting outside them, the people sleeping rough in the streets, the growth of homelessness, the sense of deep despair that leads even the Government to appoint a Minister for Suicide Prevention and civil society to report in depth on unheard of levels of loneliness and isolation.”

Though as a citizen of the UK I respectfully beg to differ with the professor’s claim that such social and economic carnage seems “contrary to British values,”(on the contrary it is entirely in keeping with the values of the country’s Tory establishment, an establishment for whom the dehumanization of the poor and working class is central to its ideology), the point he makes about it being “obvious to anyone who opens their eyes,” is well made.

For it is now the case that in every town and city centre in Britain, it is impossible to walk in any direction for more than a minute before coming across homeless people begging in the street. And the fact that some 13,000 of them are former soldiers, casualties of the country’s various military adventures in recent years, undertaken in service to Washington, exposes the pious platitudes peddled by politicians and the government as reverence for the troops and their ‘sacrifice,’ as insincere garbage.

Overall, 14 million people in the UK are now living in poverty, a figure which translates into an entire fifth of the population. Four million of them are children, while, according to Professor Alston, 1.5 million people are destitute – that is, unable to afford the basic necessities of life.

And this is what the ruling class of the fifth largest economy in the world, a country that parades itself on the world stage as a pillar of democracy and human rights, considers progress.

The values responsible for creating such a grim social landscape are compatible with the 18th not 21st century. They are proof positive that the network of elite private schools – Eton, Harrow, Fettes College et al. – where those responsible for this human carnage are inculcated with the sense of entitlement and born to rule ethos that defines them, are Britain’s hotbeds of extremism.

Professor Alston:“British compassion for those who are suffering has been replaced by a punitive, mean-spirited, and often callous approach apparently designed to instill discipline where it is least useful, to impose a rigid order on the lives of those least capable of coping with today’s world, and elevating the goal of enforcing blind compliance over a genuine concern to improve the well-being of those at the lowest levels of British society.”

Here, set out above in bold relief, is the barbarism that walks hand in hand with free market capitalism. It is the same barbarism that was responsible for pushing post-Soviet Russia into a decade-long economic and social abyss in the 1990s, and the values that have pushed 14 million people in the UK into the same economic and social abyss in our time.

Austerity, it bears emphasizing, is not and never has been a viable economic response to recession in a given economy.

Instead, it is an ideological club, wielded on behalf of the rich and big business to ensure that the price paid for said economic recession is borne exclusively by those least able to bear it – namely the poor and working people. It is class war by any other name, packaged and presented as legitimate government policy.

However in Britain’s case in 2018, this is a war like no other because as Professor Philip Alston’s report lays bare, one side in this war has been throwing all the punches and one side has been taking them.

As the saying goes, wars take place when the government tells you who the enemy is; revolutions take place when you work it out for yourself.

As it happens I am a Russophile and have been for more than 50 years. But I have four children under the age of 12 and all of them have loved Masha and her friend the big protective bear quite without a single exposition from me on the State and Revolution or the limitations of Lenin’s New Economic Policy. I usually wait until my children are 12 before explaining that Socialism = Soviet Power plus electrification.

In any case, Masha and the Bear don’t live under Socialism – they live in a capitalist state, the new economic policy is the same as that of the rest of the world. Their Russia is already well-electrified, and revolution and Soviet Power are in the museum. More’s the pity from my point of view, but there we are.

What is astounding is that all of that notwithstanding the fear and loathing of Russia continues unabated as if Stalin, the Comintern and the class against class party-line of the Third Period was still, a thing.

And thus anything nice or attractive which emanates from Russia must be attacked by the antibodies of the Western media as if it were a virus. Masha and the Bear, a virus.

Yet I have sat with four children in a row on my knee watching this cartoon entirely oblivious to a scintilla of politics of any kind being spread.

Unlike Masha and the Bear’s Western equivalents.

When I was my children’s age, I endured a daily diet of comic heroes flying straight out of the Western imperialist’s camp (and lived to tell the tale).

There was Biggles, an imperialist airman, and there was the Englishman the Wolf of Kabul (and his Neanderthal Afghan guide “clicky ba” – so called because he smote the Englishman’s foolish enemies with a cricket-bat). There was the urbane Lone Ranger and his long-suffering savage Uncle Tom – Tonto. There was Tin-Tin.

But soaring above them all, there was “Superman”, of course. “For Truth Justice and the American Way,” he strained every sinew (how differently things could have turned out if the baby Superman had landed on the steppes instead of the American prairie – and put his formidable shoulder into helping Stalin build Socialism!)

In a decade I have never heard either Masha or her Bear say a single word about “the Russian Way.” I have never seen either belittle, humiliate, orientalize or patronize a single native, anywhere. I have never heard either proselytize for empire, for racial supremacy or for their country’s right to subjugate others. It’s all been just good clean fun. But perhaps I just don’t have the eye for the subliminal method.

Masha and the Bear has billions of views on YouTube and more than 4 million subscribers and few really knew that President Putin was behind them. Why the fiendish “Kremlin” according to my Sunday newspaper has “ramped up” its propaganda efforts by branching into Spanish! And going on to Netflix!

Last year a lecturer at Tallinn University Priit Hobemagi claimed little Masha (or perhaps her bear) were “a danger to Estonian national security.”

And now an English “intelligence expert” Anthony Glees from the University of Buckingham explains in my newspaper that “Masha is feisty, even rather nasty, but plucky” – just like Russia he implies.”She punches above her weight. It’s not far-fetched to see her as Putinesque,” the “intelligence expert” explains.

Though Masha and the Bear have nothing to do with the Kremlin or Putin and are a perfectly capitalist private sector affair who have (presumably) earned their creators a suitably filthy pile of roubles in private profit, the haters of Russia cannot escape their synonym that anything good out of Russia must be a Putin-plot.

On Wednesday September 30, 2015 at 1:16 pm, the Palestinian flag was raised outside the headquarters of the United Nations in New York for the first time.

A United Nations committee is directed to facilitate self-determination among colonized and suppressed people groups. The committee is poised to pass 9 resolutions against Israel. Predictably, the charge of anti-Semitism arises.

It is not hard to dismantle the accusation – using context, fact-checking, and a bit of logic.

In Boston, a billboard honoring first responders in Gaza who lost their lives, was taken down when the billboard company staff started receiving phone calls started coming in calling them terrorists and anti-Semites.“anti-Semitic.”

In Britain, Labor Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, an outspoken critic of Israel, is on the receiving end of a smear campaign that is all about anti-Semitism.

When President Trump’s son Eric recently used the word “shekels” in a comment about journalist Bob Woodward, it was called by some “an anti-Semitic dog whistle”; some speculated that the whole Trump family might be anti-Semitic.

Esther Koontz, boycotter and Public Enemy #1

A math teacher in Kansas was asked to sign a form certifying that she was “not currently engaged in a boycott of Israel” in order to be contracted by the state to train other math teachers. She couldn’t sign because she was in fact boycotting Israel. State law forbade her from getting the job.

A nationwide bill in Congress would similarly criminalize boycotts or criticism of Israel, with a maximum fine of $1 million and a 20-year prison sentence. As The Forward explains, “the argument that BDS is hate speech and, at its very core, anti-Semitic stems from the movement’s support of the Palestinian right of return, which [Anti-Defamation League director Abe] Foxman describes as ‘the destruction of the Jewish state through demography.’

When at the close of his presidency, President Obama directed US ambassador to the UN Samantha Powers to abstain from voting in support of Israeli settlement-building on Palestinian land, that move was dubbed “the most anti-Semitic act of 2016” by the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

Israel self-identifies as “the Jewish State” (much to the displeasure of the 20% of the population who are non-Jewish). It seems to follow that if the State is Jewish, then criticism of the State is criticism of Jews. Hence the label “anti-Semitic.”

What the UN is up to

UN Watch, which is dedicated to finding anti-Semitism in the United Nations, announced Friday,

A United Nations General Assembly committee is set to adopt nine resolutions against Israel tomorrow, and zero on the entire rest of the world.

Before we panic, let us do a little research. For starters, what is this “committee”?

It’s called the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (aka the Fourth Committee), and its job is specifically to address those parts of the world where colonization still exists – and to work toward self-determination for those peoples.

María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés, fourth woman to assume the Presidency of the General Assembly

H.E. Mrs. María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés, President of the 73rd Session of the UN General Assembly, put it this way: “We have a commitment to ensure the full independence of all colonial countries and peoples, and this commitment – a clear objective of the UN Charter – must be recognized and achieved.”

Since the creation of the Fourth Committee in 1962, over 80 colonized territories have obtained their freedom, and only about 17 remain. Palestine is not on that list of 17 – presumably because it is not “colonized” in the traditional sense, but rather occupied – but Israel has denied the Palestinian people self-determination. The Committee wants to fulfill the vision of the UN Charter for these people.

Besides the Western Sahara (population 584,000), most of the territories still on the agenda are tiny islands with a tiny population. The largest is New Caledonia, with a population of 270,000′; the smallest is Pitcairn with a population of 39.

Almost 6 million Palestinians live without full human rights in the Palestinian Territories and Israel – a noteworthy injustice.

The Zionist Organization of America sponsored Hillel Neuer for a lecture and discussion on UN bias towards Israel, September 2018

The complaint, the context

Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, is horrified by the “torrent of one-sided resolutions” against Israel.

He fumed, “Days after the Hamas terrorist group assaulted Israeli civilians with a barrage of 460 rockets — while the UN’s General Assembly and Human Rights Council stayed silent — the world body now adds insult to injury by adopting nine lopsided condemnations, whose only purpose is to demonize the Jewish state.”

Context, please? Israel accuses Hamas of shooting “a barrage” of rockets at civilians. Why would Hamas do that? Because Hamas is anti-Semitic? No.

The rocket attack came because:

Israel has imposed an 11-year blockade on Gazans, withholding food, medicine, and other necessities.

Israel has initiated 3 “wars” against the people of Gaza while they were under blockade

Snipers have killed well over 200 unarmed Gazans – among them medical personnel, journalists, children, disabled people, and often bystanders – as they protested, unarmed

The Israeli military, which readily kills anyone trying to cross its border, infiltrated into Gaza and ended up killing 7 Palestinians; Hamas answered with said rockets (which, until last week, had not killed an Israeli during peacetime in over 7 years)

Eight Qassam launchers, seven equipped with operating systems and one armed and ready to launch, uncovered during an IDF operation in northern Gaza.

Rocket-launching may not be the ideal response to Israel’s actions, but Israel and its supporters must acknowledge this context and the predictable anger of the Palestinian people.

We might all ask the question, what should Palestinians do instead of launching rockets? Be more quiet and orderly in their protests? – It’s easy for a privileged Israel ally who has not spent years under blockade to suggest this, and such a protest would accomplish nothing. Get rid of Hamas? – Gazans elected Hamas to lead a resistance against Israel’s illegal actions. Rarely-fatal rockets and stones are Gaza’s answer to snipers, warplanes, drones, and tanks.

The people of Gaza are fighting for their lives. Full stop.

“What about those other guys?”

UN Watch director Hillel Neuer complained further that EU states, which were expected to support most of the resolutions against Israel, “have failed to introduce a single UNGA resolution on the human rights situation in China, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Belarus, Cuba, Turkey, Pakistan, Vietnam, Algeria, or on 175 other countries.”

UN soldiers look out on a post at Mount Avital, in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights near the Israeli-Syrian border on February 10, 2018. Photo: Reuters / Ammar Awad

Neuer complained further that one of the resolutions condemns Israel for its ongoing encroachment on the Golan Heights, and calls for Israel to return the land and its people to Syria.

His rebuttal – “After the Syrian regime has killed half a million of its own people, how can the UN call for more people to be handed over to Assad’s rule?” – suggests that Israel should keep illegally occupied Syrian land – with Syrian people on it – because Israel is a better overlord.

And there’s this comment: “[The] resolutions claim to care about Palestinians, yet the UN is oblivious to the dozens of Palestinians who have been slaughtered, maimed and expelled by Assad’s forces, and more than 3,000 victims killed since 2011.”

This begs the question, what are Palestinians doing in Syria? Answer: they are refugees from Israel’s ethnic cleansing operations in 1948 and 1967. Context, Mr. Neuer.

“Scapegoat”

Neuer persisted, “the UN’s automatic majority has no interest in truly helping Palestinians, nor in protecting anyone’s human rights; the goal of these ritual, one-sided condemnations is to scapegoat Israel.”

This is an interesting conclusion, as most of the specific demands the UN has made are in the direct interest of Palestinian safety and human rights. Just a few examples:

In 1967, the UN condemned Israel’s measures to change the status of Jerusalem as invalid.

In 1971, the UN called for the implementation of UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (Palestinian right of return), which had been on the books since 1948 but never implemented.

In 1979, the UN deplored Israel’s lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping force.

In 1988, the UNSC expressed deep concern’ at Israel’s failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.

In 1992, the UNSC strongly condemned Israel’s deportation of 413 Palestinians and called for their immediate return.

And on and on it goes.

The large number of resolutions against Israel is partly due to Israel’s refusal to comply with UN demands, making it necessary to repeat them. Thus we find

11 resolutions demanding an end to Israel’s collaboration with South Africa,

Over 30 resolutions calling on Israel to stop attacking or to withdraw from Lebanon.

Over 30 resolutions demanding nuclear disarmament or demanding that Israel “withdraw its threat to attack nuclear facilities of neighboring nations.”

In addition, the UN found it necessary in 1967 to create the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Population of the Occupied Territories, which reports yearly on Israel’s abuses – not because the committee is anti-Semitic, but because Palestinian human rights abuses have not abated.

Another critical voice

According to Committee meeting coverage, the representative from Israel had a few choice words for the body, in which he blamed “Arab” threats and aggression for the failure to achieve peace.

Additionally, he criticized the UN for bullying the “Jewish State,” made inaccurate statements about Palestinian refugee status, and pointed out the body’s failure to sanction Hamas.

Accountability

Israel and its fan club seem bent on ignoring inconvenient truths, choosing instead to deflect attention from Israel’s transgressions by accusing nearly the whole world of using Palestinian human rights as a pawn to bully the Jewish State.

150 or more countries voted in favor of most the resolutions against Israel.

And that brings us back around to anti-Semitism.

This country identifies as Jewish, and is called to account for its myriad, well-documented human rights abuses. Instead of correcting its faults – or defending its innocence – it concludes that anti-Semitism is the problem.

Condemnation of Israel in the UN is happening because Israel is guilty. If the occupation and the wall and the human rights abuses end, so will the UN resolutions.

It’s time to get real, starting with Israel’s advocates: instead of blaming the world for picking on the Jewish State, take a good, hard, contextualized look at Israel’s actions and condemn them, instead of propping up bad behavior.

John 8:44-45 (KJV)

The truth moment. Said it was “The Black Pope”. They said it was the Lizard people, They said it was the UN. The said it was the NWO. They said it was the Nazis, That said it was the the Khazars. They said it was the liberals. They said it was the Illuminati. Some say it was the Talmud that led to the destruction of the world. Almost none say it was the OT and the god within it. It is against the teaching of the church and considered evil. Perhaps it should be. I would argue Jesus himself warned against his own people. I would say he attempted to warn the world that god of his tribe was the in his own words the devil.

This is to painful for many of the followers of “the Abrahamic religions.”

The gentle world has always failed to recognize this and has paid the price. The OT Bible clearly has as the main character the chosen people themselves. Thus always and forever any people other then the chosen people are minor characters in the story.

Worse then that they take on the fire and the power of the OT god with there hearts.

Judaism is not a religion per say it is a war code. In reality it;’s leaders do not bow before any god or man. They are men of magic and war and espionage. They believe that they and they alone call upon angels and demons to destroy their enemies.

They want only a war king. A king David. And many of the Gentiles think they want that also.

The Book of Job where god plays tricks and makes bargains with his creations seems much like the deals and temptations offered by the devil.

To be fair the god of the OT is seen as a more powerful entity he controls the evil spirits. and cast them upon his chosen people or upon the enemies of Israel.

Keep in mind all discussion of the Bible and the Holy land and all the characters and places and political surrounding it in the end support only full takeover of the world by Israel.

You wind up with the Church fighting withing it self. You end up with “The Crusades” The 100 years war in England. You end up with The British empire, then the American empire crushing enemies of the Bible. You end up with people obsessed with wrathful warriors of Yahweh looking to crush all enemies in the name of “goodness”.

You end up with the flip side. The liberal church in the UK the EU and the USA are also very strong. They have a lot of money. Huge support. They will crush anyone who gets in their way who does not follow a liberal god a gender neutral god a social justice god or what ever kind of god the JMSM needs them to worship.

Of coarse it is the opposite of the father god of the OT but each seeks to serve the same goal that of complete destruction of “the heathen” the other” the gentile.

Do people in the ME and other war zones care if the are bombed to death in the name of Satan or some other god? They would still be dead. No one can face the fact that it’s just words and stories.

It would be considered in very bad taste to question if the God of the OT Bible is similar to evil beings such as the Devil or Satan.

Even with the sharp rise in atheism and paganism or what have you if in the wrong context you mention that Yahweh the god of the OT may be a “war god” or “the devil” it can get you into trouble.

The real name of YHVH Yod Heh Vav Heh and it’s proper pronunciation was allegedly only known to the High Priest of Jerusalem.

YHVH sometimes known as Jehovah Adoni Lord. I would argue means differt things to different people.

To say the name of god was forbidden.

The Jewish high priest were class are they only ones permitted to speak the name of god. They were they only ones allowed to enter the Temple.

The tribe of the OT was concerned only with war victory. Thus, there code book the Bible was made to have them win and keep themselves fit for war victory. Win in war and do what I say and I will make you number one. Do what I say and I will give you power is that not what the Devil or Satan says as well?

It was an exclusive god only for one tribe. Then Jesus taught against this as well as warned people that the god of the high priest was “of your father the devil”

This was not following the law Jesus was in violation of the exclusive law of the Bible. That is why he was killed,

The liberals are permitted to do so provided they promote atheism or attack Christ together with the OT.

But why is the God of the OT so similar to the devil? In that he kills so many people he gets jealous and curses enemies of his tribal people.

The stories in the OT are of a god that ask his people to do war

Christians and Jews alike will say the god of the OT evolved now he is nice.

Some of if not all of the finest members of the “truth movement” will condemn The Talmud and the Kabbalah.

But what did Jesus say about the god of his own people? He said he was the devil Of course the Christians who are some times the greatest defenders of the OT will make every kind of excuse for the extreme evil acts of the god of the OT and his chosen warrior tribe.

Mike Piper author of Finale Judgement mentioned the fact that Joseph P. Kennedy said “that crippled son of a bitch that killed my son?”. I think the public took it for granted that Kennedy meant the Germans killed his son during the horrors of war. Yet Piper made us realize that FDR whose government was riddled Communist and Jews and Zionist and what have you killed Joe P. Kennedy’s son.

The reality is the Jews were at war with the Kennedy family and they wiped them out.

Then why is it the gentiles don’t believe Jesus why he tells them Your of your father the devil?

They defend with all their might the Torah. They will Jesus meant only the leadership the Pharisees are of the devil.

Some will shout with glee that had these leaders been obeying the Torah in the spirit in which it was written, Jesus would have commended them.

Yet Jesus broke the laws of the Torah by healing the sick and opening heaven to all people not just the “chosen people”

Did Jesus not die for disobeying “the Law”?

Every excuse in the world is made for the violence and insane stories contained within the OT.

The “church” if you can call it that the Christians fight one another often to the death over interpretation of a book that was not written for them.

Some say Jesus is the Seed of the David line. What about the virgin birth? Why was Jesus a peacemaker and not a King of David warrior type?

That he Jesus followed the law in the Bible can not be true. He was a rebel against the law and the leadership.

Then Jesus would have been in favor of destroying the middle east Russia China and every other nation and culture? Because is that following the law of the OT is it not?

Every effort is made by every sect of Christianity to cover for the evil deeds of the god of the OT.

Is that not what the law of the Torah says to destroy all tribes and other people who do not bow to the will of Yaweh?

A jealous god who takes revenge upon his followers who do not do his bidding. a god that sets curses and plagues upon his enemies.

Yet, was Jesus not killed because he violated the law of the Torah? Who is the god of the OT? What is his name?

Exodus 15:3

The Lord is a man of war,YHVH is His Name Ex.15:3)

Remember what Jesus said about the god of the OT.

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

Laurent Guyénot writes in From Yahweh to Zion

The “devil” (diabolos in Greek) will make his appearance in the Gospels, and “Lucifer” later still, based on a tendentious exegesis of Isaiah 14: 12 in the Latin translation (Vulgate). As for “the satan,” it appears to be borrowed from a Sumerian legal word meaning the “accuser,” and it never occurs as a proper name in the Pentateuch (Torah). “Satan” is the prosecution lawyer in Zechariah 3: 1 and in the book of Job. 51 In the Old Testament, when he personifies a destructive principle, Satan is hard to distinguish from Yahweh himself.

Thus, in 2 Samuel 24, Yahweh incites David to abuse his power, while in the same episode recounted by 1 Chronicles 21, the role is given to Satan. One reads in the latter narrative that “Satan took his stand against Israel” (21: 1), that “God […] punished Israel” (21: 7), that “the angel of Yahweh wreaks havoc throughout the territory of Israel” (21: 12) and that “Yahweh unleashed an epidemic on Israel” (21: 14). Ultimately, it is always God who strikes not only the enemies of Israel, but also Israel itself when it proves unworthy of him. It is he who triggers

wars, epidemics, and plagues of every imaginable sort; he uses alternately Israel to destroy the nations (as a “mace,” Jeremiah 51: 20), and the nations to destroy Israel. Yahweh is the source of both good and evil. (It follows logically, according to some kabbalistic schools, that one can serve him through evil as well as through good.)

as‘lobro’ commentor on TUT writes:

‘The more one hears and reads about this ‘yahweh,’ the less distinction one sees between him and the classical devil. Can someone actually list at least a few items that distinguish them?

I know of none, as both enjoy and promote evil in all its forms, not just military carnage, occupation, enslavement and humiliation of the conquered people, but downright perverted filth and inverted morality for its own sake.

Well, the devil is traditionally an equal opportunity employer whereas yahweh has a special endogamically bred and trained swarm of psychopaths to do his bidding against those who would object to such regimen, so if anything, yahweh is worse than devil.

Any gentile favorably inclined to Jews or to their deity yahweh or even neutral to them, is fully deserving of punishment for treason against humanity and morals, as the fires of hell will surely scorch their hides when the times of divine retribution comes, no excuses for protestant herds that they were merely following their zionist preachers, like Jerry Fallwell who picked up the “prestigious” Jabotinsky medal from arch-terrorist Menachem Begin.’

What is the difference of a god without mercy and the devil? The Christians make huge

Joseph Campbell writes in The Inner reaches of of Outer Space metaphor as myth and Religion

A third motivation, which has been the unique generator of the action on the stage of world history-since the period, at least, of Sargon I of Akkad, in southern Mesopotamia, c. 2300 B.c.-is the apparently irresistible impulse to plunder. Psychologically, this might perhaps be read as an extension of the bio-energetic command to feed upon and consume; however, the motivation here is not of any such primal biological urgency, but of an impulse launched from the eyes, not to consume, but to possess. An ample anthology of exemplary texts to this purpose, readily at hand,
will be found in the Bible; for example: When the Lord your God brings you into the land which you are entering to take possession of it, and clears away many nations before you, the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mighter than yourselves, and when the Lord your God gives them over to you, and you defeat them; then you must utterly destroy them; you shall make no covenant with them and show them no mercy.

You shall not make marriages with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their daughters for your sons. For they would turn away your sons from following me, to serve other gods; then the anger of the Lord would be kindled against you, and he would destroy you utterly. But thus shall you deal with them; you shall break down their altars, and dash in pieces their pillars, and hew down their Asherim, and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a people holy to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for his

own possession, out of all the peoples that are on the face of the earth. (Deuteronomy 7:1-6) When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it. And if its answer to you is peace and it opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall do forced labor for you and shall serve you. But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; and when the Lord your God gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the Lord your God has given you. Thus you shall do to all the cities which are very far from you, which are not cities of the nations here. But in the cities of these people that the Lord your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, as the Lord your God has commanded. (Deuteronomy 20:10-18) And when the Lord your God brings you into the land which he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give you, with great and goodly cities, which you did not build, and houses full of all good things, which you did not fill, and cisterns hewn out, which you did not hew, and vineyards and olive trees, which you did not plant, and when you eat and are full, then take heed lest you for­ get the Lord, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. (Deuteronomy 6:10-12) War gods of this kind, always tribal in their ranges both of mercy and of power, have abounded over the earth as the fomenting agents of world history.

So the God of the OT makes a pact with his people. Follow my rules and I will love you and make you win at war.

Rome was a nation state built on business and war. Judea was a war state a temple state that was build on theology so it won out in the long run.

In the Temple State you sacrifice to Yahweh so you can win at war. Instead of realizing this simple fact the gentile world as joined in on it. They the gentile have at times tried to resist Judaic power. But have utterly failed to do so. Could it be because they attempt to worship a god that is not their own?

The language and barbarity of the OT is second to none in it’s passion and that of those other then the OT god and his chosen people. The reason why they “win” or destroy the nations of the Gentiles is becasue they belive it their destany to rule and they have a tradition of believing they will be punished.

In a sense is that not what the devil does. If you obey him he rewards you.

The devil said to him, “I will give all this to you, if you will bow down and worship me.”

Matthew 4:9

Now in the OT Deuteronomy 28. Yahweh says he will bless you and give you everything if you worship him but if not he will curse you. This seems very human or very similar to the deal offered by the devil in some ways. Its is above all a set of rules to encourage the read to obey and defeat the enemies of of god. That would be and still is to this very day Israel.

1“If you obey the Lord your God and faithfully keep all his commands that I am giving you today, he will make you greater than any other nation on earth. 2Obey the Lord your God and all these blessings will be yours:3“The Lord will bless your towns and your fields.4“The Lord will bless you with many children, with abundant crops, and with many cattle and sheep

5“But if you disobey the Lord your God and do not faithfully keep all his commands and laws that I am giving you today, all these evil things will happen to you:16“The Lord will curse your towns and your fields.17“The Lord will curse your grain crops and the food you prepare from them.18“The Lord will curse you by giving you only a few children, poor crops, and few cattle and sheep.19“The Lord will curse everything you do.20“If you do evil and reject the Lord, he will bring on you disaster, confusion, and trouble in everything you do, until you are quickly and completely destroyed.21He will send disease after disease on you until there is not one of you left in the land that you are about to occupy.22The Lord will strike you with infectious diseases, with swelling and fever; he will send drought and scorching winds to destroy your crops. These disasters will be with you until you die.23No rain will fall, and your ground will become as hard as iron.24Instead of rain, the Lord will send down duststorms and sandstorms until you are destroyed.25“The Lord will give your enemies victory over you. You will attack them from one direction, but you will run from them in all directions, and all the people on earth will be terrified when they see what happens to you.26When you die, birds and wild animals will come and eat your bodies, and there will be no one to scare them off.27The Lord will send boils on you, as he did on the Egyptians. He will make your bodies break out with sores. You will be covered with scabs, and you will itch, but there will be no cure.28The Lord will make you lose your mind; he will strike you with blindness and confusion.29You will grope about in broad daylight like someone blind, and you will not be able to find your way. You will not prosper in anything you do. You will be constantly oppressed and robbed, and there will be no one to help you.30“You will be engaged to a young woman – but someone else will marry her. You will build a house – but never live in it. You will plant a vineyard – but never eat its grapes.31Your cattle will be butchered before your very eyes, but you will not eat any of the meat. Your donkeys will be dragged away while you look on, and they will not be given back to you. Your sheep will be given to your enemies, and there will be no one to help you.32Your sons and daughters will be given as slaves to foreigners while you look on. Every day you will strain your eyes, looking in vain for your children to return.33A foreign nation will take all the crops that you have worked so hard to grow, while you receive nothing but constant oppression and harsh treatment.34Your sufferings will make you lose your mind.35The Lord will cover your legs with incurable, painful sores; boils will cover you from head to foot.36“The Lord will take you and your king away to a foreign land, where neither you nor your ancestors ever lived before; there you will serve gods made of wood and stone.37In the countries to which the Lord will scatter you, the people will be shocked at what has happened to you; they will make fun of you and ridicule you.38“You will plant plenty of seed, but reap only a small harvest, because the locusts will eat your crops.39You will plant vineyards and take care of them, but you will not gather their grapes or drink wine from them, because worms will eat the vines.40Olive trees will grow everywhere in your land, but you will not have any olive oil, because the olives will drop off.41You will have sons and daughters, but you will lose them, because they will be taken away as prisoners of war.42All your trees and crops will be devoured by insects.43“Foreigners who live in your land will gain more and more power, while you gradually lose yours.44They will have money to lend you, but you will have none to lend them. In the end they will be your rulers.45“All these disasters will come on you, and they will be with you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the Lord your God and keep all the laws that he gave you.46They will be the evidence of God’s judgment on you and your descendants forever.47The Lord blessed you in every way, but you would not serve him with glad and joyful hearts.48So then, you will serve the enemies that the Lord is going to send against you. You will be hungry, thirsty, and naked – in need of everything. The Lord will oppress you harshly until you are destroyed.49The Lord will bring against you a nation from the ends of the earth, a nation whose language you do not know. They will swoop down on you like an eagle.50They will be ruthless and show no mercy to anyone, young or old.51They will eat your livestock and your crops, and you will starve to death. They will not leave you any grain, wine, olive oil, cattle, or sheep; and you will die.52They will attack every town in the land that the Lord your God is giving you, and the high, fortified walls in which you trust will fall.53“When your enemies are besieging your towns, you will become so desperate for food that you will even eat the children that the Lord your God has given you.54Even the most refined man of noble birth will become so desperate during the siege that he will eat some of his own children because he has no other food. He will not even give any to his brother or to the wife he loves or to any of his children who are left.56Even the most refined woman of noble birth, so rich that she has never had to walk anywhere, will behave in the same way. When the enemy besieges her town, she will become so desperate for food that she will secretly eat her newborn child and the afterbirth as well. She will not share them with the husband she loves or with any of her children. 58“If you do not obey faithfully all of God’s teachings that are written in this book and if you do not honor the wonderful and awesome name of the Lord your God,59he will send on you and on your descendants incurable diseases and horrible epidemics that can never be stopped.60He will bring on you once again all the dreadful diseases you experienced in Egypt, and you will never recover.61He will also send all kinds of diseases and epidemics that are not mentioned in this book of God’s laws and teachings, and you will be destroyed.62Although you become as numerous as the stars in the sky, only a few of you will survive, because you did not obey the Lord your God.63Just as the Lord took delight in making you prosper and in making you increase in number, so he will take delight in destroying you and in bringing ruin on you. You will be uprooted from the land that you are about to occupy.64“The Lord will scatter you among all the nations, from one end of the earth to the other, and there you will serve gods made of wood and stone, gods that neither you nor your ancestors have ever worshiped before.65You will find no peace anywhere, no place to call your own; the Lord will overwhelm you with anxiety, hopelessness, and despair.66Your life will always be in danger. Day and night you will be filled with terror, and you will live in constant fear of death.67Your hearts will pound with fear at everything you see. Every morning you will wish for evening; every evening you will wish for morning.68The Lord will send you back to Egypt in ships, even though he said that you would never have to go there again. There you will try to sell yourselves to your enemies as slaves, but no one will want to buy you.”