Should we have another revolution? Yes, we should. The police have
gotten too blood thirsty. recently I heard one PD (Las Cruces, New
Mexico) complain that losing the "right" to impose civil forfeiture
without getting a conviction would cost them hundreds of thousands
of dollar inoperating funds. The cops are not just killers, they
are thieves.

We have the surveillance state, the nanny state, 56% percent or
more of our wealth going to pay taxes (Check out how much tax you
are paying on the internet service you are using to read this). Our
political discourse on just about everything driven by anger and
ignorance, and we have two political parties that flat out hate
science and technology giving the "Ordinary Joe" more control of
his life. They hate the potential of economic growth stripping
them of their position as ration masters.

Seems like we are due for a change profound enough to call a
revolution. Secondly, we need this revolution to be peaceful, or at
least as peaceful as possible. The reason for this is sublimely
simple. Violent revolution leads to the creation of military
hierarchies, and this leads to generals who expect to be leaders
in the post civil war (for that is what violent revolution turns
into) government. In fact, the discipline of cells and party
hierarchies becomes the framework of the next government. Reliance
on force to obtain goals becomes the seeds of the next tyranny.

Therefor, for the coming revolution must be peaceful to delay the
next time we must have a revolution

Was that worth reading?Then why not:

Just click the red box (it's a button!) to pay the author

This site may receive compensation if a product is purchasedthrough one of our partner or affiliate referral links. Youalready know that, of course, but this is part of the FTC DisclosurePolicy found here. (Warning: this is a 2,359,896-byte 53-page PDF file!)TLE AFFILIATE