Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Article Tools

Just this morning I met a lovely 90-year-old woman artist who described the pain from her liver cancer and wondered why so many people have cancer now. She pondered aloud: Is it something in our food? A lot of people are wondering the same thing.

What would you do if you learned that many of our foods – including some fresh produce and meat but mostly processed foods made with such ingredients as beet sugar, corn, or soy – are toxic from man-made, genetically modified organisms (GMOs). At times I have become frustrated, learning important information about food made with GMOs yet seeing no discernable steps toward creating change. Now there is a chance to get involved and take action to preserve the safety of our food.

Jill Frandsen

I pondered many questions on my journey toward healthy food and the preservation of our seed bank. The fact is that in the United States up to 80% of processed foods are contaminated with GMOs. You may wonder: What is genetically engineered food? Genetically engineered food comes from seeds or animals that have been altered on a molecular level by genes from other plants, animals, viruses, or bacteria. There is a long list of reasons and excuses for the inclusion of GMOs in our foods. The initial scientific ideas were that genetically modified crops would increase production and reduce pesticide use for farmers, but this has proven faulty over time.

There’s no doubt that many Americans are interested in ingredients so that they can avoid allergens and, in general, consume food that promotes health. So why don’t we know more about GMOs in our food supply? Because the normal FDA regulations were side-stepped; new product testing did not occur to determine the safety of genetically modified (GM) foods.

There is currently a campaign in California to pass a statewide initiative to label foods that contain GMOs, and if you want your food labeled, this is your chance to get involved. Once enough signatures are gathered, the measure will qualify to be on the ballot for the November 2012 election.

Is mandatory labeling a new idea? Not at all. Many countries internationally require GMO labeling. Fifty countries, in fact, containing more than 40 percent of the world’s population, already label genetically engineered foods. Yet the United States not only fails to require labeling, it actively prohibits the labeling of non-GM food in the U.S.

European Union regulations require labeling to distinguish foods produced from GM crops from those made with conventional or organic crops, due to high demand from European consumers for freedom to choose between GM and non-GM foods. In addition, genetically altered crops in the field pose a hazard of contamination to conventional and organic crops.

An enormous majority of Americans, too, want to know which foods they consume contain GMOs, according to national surveys. Yet a false “mutual equivalency” claim allowed Monsanto and other corporations to skip the FDA’s federally mandated testing for a new food product. This was based on the argument that GMO food products are “the same” as food products that have not been genetically modified. It is ironic that these same corporations claiming “mutual equivalency” to avoid normal food safety testing and labeling also claim “exclusive patent” to GM seeds and animals.

The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act would simply require that genetically engineered food sold in retail outlets be labeled. Once people know their food ingredients, they can make a choice to consume GMOs – or not.

For more information and to volunteer please visit labelgmos.org. We can make a difference for the future of food.

More like this story

Jill Frandsen is working toward a masters degree in clinical psychology at Antioch University in Santa Barbara, and active with The Committee for the Right to Know, a grassroots coalition that seeks the labeling of genetically engineered foods.

Comments

Thanks, Jill, for this informative piece! I read about a poll that found it was something like 93% of American's who want their food labeled with GMO ingredients... that's pretty close to unanimous. And thanks to the Independent, for putting the story out there.

The lady that Jill met was born from a generation of people that had a life expectancy of 47 years of age in the USA. If anything, she, like my grandmother who lived to be a 102 years. Lived through both world wars and the great depression; benefited from hybrid foods. I am certain that she never would have lived long enough to get cancer. Cancer in older people is not uncommon and many forms are still not treatable; small cell carcinoma is an example. So, when we live longer our cells mutate. Cancer cells are the unregulated growth of abnormal cells that intrude or invade normal cells. The very fact that we are living longer has allowed for these diseases to present themselves in this new age demographic. This demographic is in the age of 65 and over; 10 times that of all other age groups and the largest demographic age group. I would agree that hormones in dairy products have lowered the age of early menses in females and puberty in males. GMO is too new to show a qualitative or quantitative study to significantly demonstrate an affect on humans or animals. Congress tried to pass a law against the internal combustion motor. Looking at the lack of variety of vegetables, categorically, in your grocery store’s produce department and that is where you should see a cause for worry.