duncan.coutts:
> On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 13:32 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> > duncan.coutts:
> > > The question is this:
> > >
> > > Should we allow compatible API additions to a library in a minor
> > > release of the platform?
> > >
> > > The choice is between allowing only bug fixes in minor releases,
> > > or also allowing new features that add APIs but do not change
> > > any existing APIs.
> >
> >
> > I'd like to ensure that the Haskell Platform respects the minor
> > versioning policy for its constituent parts, specified,
> >
> > http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy#Version_numbers> >
> > That is, if a library author follows the minor version number bump
> > policy, then they can reasonably expect to have that library bump
> > included in the next minor bump of the platform.
>> I don't follow this. The package versioning policy distinguished
> compatible API changes from no API changes.
Right, and that's exactly what we should follow for the platform meta
package.
> > If we agree on this, a lot of the decision making for library bumps
> > becomes automated. If we don't, we have to distinguish case-by-case
> > whether a library bump added to the API.
>> Surely it's automatic in either case?
>> If we choose to allow API additions then it's automatic, we just look at
> if the first two version numbers have not changed.
>> If we choose to require the same API then it's automatic, we just look
> at if the first three version numbers have not changed.
That's a good point!
Yes, I'm advocating the "minor" (2 significant digits) policy applies
both to the platform, and its constituents, identically.
-- Don