PER CURIAM: Helen Roper
(Wife) and R. Scott Dover, on behalf of Jake Roper (Husband) (collectively the
Ropers), appeal the administrative law court's (ALC) finding that they were operators of the underground
storage tanks (tanks) removed from the Roper 66 gas station. On appeal, the
Ropers argue this finding is not supported by substantial evidence in the
record. We affirm.[1]

We find the ALC's finding that
the Ropers were operators of the tanks is supported by substantial evidence in
the record. SeeOriginal Blue Ribbon Taxi Corp. v. S.C. Dep't of
Motor Vehicles, 380 S.C. 600,
604, 670 S.E.2d 674, 676 (Ct. App. 2008) ("The decision of the [ALC]
should not be overturned unless it is unsupported by substantial evidence or
controlled by some error of law."). Although the Ropers did not have legal
control over the tanks, evidence was
presented showing the Ropers had responsibility for the daily operation of the tanks. See S.C. Code Ann. § 44-2-20(10) (2002) (defining an operator as "any person in control of, or having responsibility for
the daily operation of [a tank]"). Here, Timothy Glen Roper (Son) testified that Roper 66
operated as a convenience store and gas station from 1973 until 1998. Wife and
Son explained the gas pumps were located outside of the front of the store, and
the customers paid for the gasoline at Roper 66. He admitted Husband was
responsible for notifying Bush Oil if the gas pumps had problems. Additionally,
DHEC provided several documents from Wife in which Wife indicated she was the
owner and/or operator of the tanks. Furthermore, even though the lease
agreements stated that Bush Oil maintained legal control of the equipment, the
agreements designated responsibility to Husband to maintain the equipment. Accordingly,
the record contains substantial evidence to support the ALC's finding.

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, SHORT, and PIEPER,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.