Bell-fan:Klippoklondike: Farking Alex Jones, man. You're more likely to get credible information from one of those plastic kids toy phones that make animal noises when you dial them

you mean like when he was spouting that bull**** about the NSA having this huge spying program called prism that was sucking up data on everything from everyone... yeah what a load of... oh wait... FFFFFF I hate it when these crazy assholes turn out to be right...

Maybe we SHOULD wait for the UN to come back with definitive findings BEFORE we start launching shiat into other countries.

What if we find out that this is some cottage industry sarin like the Russians said it is... and that the missiles came from Saudi Arabia through AL Q connections.

Imagine how farking stupid we'd look if we did something and killed people... and it turned out we were wrong AGAIN.. JUST LIKE IN IRAQ.

Seriously... I hate to admit it... but in this one isolated instance I'd much rather NOT act before we know for a fact that Alex jone's tin foil hat squad aren't right.

Kit Fister:TuteTibiImperes: Mike_LowELL: Kit Fister: No one will care. This won't even get greened.

I hope it does. InfoWars infromes me like no other web site. If this headline gets downvoted, then it is proof that the NSA has gotten to the owner of this web site. There would be no other explanation.

2wolves:The U.S. used willie pete in Iraq. No ethical high ground in sight.

?? Nobody is claiming an ethical high ground. Just because we did something wrong, does that mean we cannot also decry someone else doing something wrong? Or does that mean we have to allow equal wrongs until everyone gets a chance to use illegal weapons in some kind of horrible tit-for-tat?

Gyrfalcon:2wolves: The U.S. used willie pete in Iraq. No ethical high ground in sight.

?? Nobody is claiming an ethical high ground. Just because we did something wrong, does that mean we cannot also decry someone else doing something wrong? Or does that mean we have to allow equal wrongs until everyone gets a chance to use illegal weapons in some kind of horrible tit-for-tat?

Mike_LowELL:Thank you, Drew, for wiping the sweat from your brow and personally greenlighting this article. This is a defining moment in our country and our voices must be heard. If the United States goes to war on false pretense and bad information, it will be unprecedented. The repercussions for our actions will come in the form of an ethical mushroom cloud, and we need to make sure the argument is a slam dunk before we choose to intervene.

Gyrfalcon:2wolves: The U.S. used willie pete in Iraq. No ethical high ground in sight.

?? Nobody is claiming an ethical high ground. Just because we did something wrong, does that mean we cannot also decry someone else doing something wrong? Or does that mean we have to allow equal wrongs until everyone gets a chance to use illegal weapons in some kind of horrible tit-for-tat?

It means that if Paraguay invaded the U.S. to find the troops that used WP our government should not have a problem.

According to the video tape, the rebels said: "I want to kill. I mean, I wanna, I wanna kill. Kill. I wanna, I wanna see, I wanna see blood and gore and guts and veins in my teeth. Eat dead burnt bodies. I mean kill, Kill, KILL, KILL."

Here's the real conspiracy theory- Alex Jones and his ilk are puppets for the system. They spout 99% gibberish and the ever so occasional nugget of truth. Look- no one looks for diamonds in the sewer. If someone told you there were diamonds under all the crap you wouldn't believe them. If a credible person told you about the diamonds, you would think they were gullible or stupid. All you've ever seen in the sewer is shiat and you will not believe anything to the contrary. The thing is that maybe the sewer is the best place of all to hide diamonds. Once a story has been tainted with the conspiracy label legitimate journalists will not touch it. It's not about control of the information itself. The only thing that matters is the public's perception of the information. That's the real Info War... if you believe that kind of thing. Us cool kids know that conspiracy stuff is all bullshiat. Right?

Calmamity:Nabb1: We shouldn't be taking sides at all. We're planning to be the Air Force for al Qaeda sympathizers against an insidious dictator. Saudi Arabia wants us to do something. Well, how about the incredibly wealthy Saudis put those fighter jets and M-1 Abrams tanks we sold them to good use. How about instead of the Saudis giving us lip service support for intervention, we offer them lip service support for intervention for a change? The Arab League should be equipped to handle this. Every time we intervene in Middle East conflicts, it seems like we win more enemies than friends. T. E. Lawrence was right.

Them and the French, who have been talking smack, should feel free to jump right in to this mess, if they think action is so important.

We don't want to aid a vicious dictator and we don't want to aid rebels that might be Al Qaeda sympathizers.

That's all fine and good. But is that really enough reason to just sit back and do nothing while innocent civilians are stuck in the crossfire?

I realize that we don't get involved in a great many conflicts where innocent people are being hurt. But to just openly say "there's no benefit for us to get involved, so suck it civilians" is a biatchilling.

Mrtraveler01:Kuroshin: If it doesn't have an AM/PM designation (and isn't 24-hour), then it's still twice per day.

You have to be quite the cheap ass to get a digital clock that doesn't have the AM/PM designation.

What did you call me? I'll have you know that I spent a good $50 for my stopped digital clock! And it has neither AM nor PM designations! You want to know whether it's morning or night? Look out the window, pleb!