Journalists Outraged As It Is Confirmed The
FBI/DOJ Has Been Spying On Them Just As The Site Stated All Along

May 16. 2013

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

First the IRS scandal, now this (IRS
Says Sorry For Targeting Conservatives As Obama Denies All Knowledge Of
Misconduct). Many journalists are angry today at confirmation
Obama’s Department of Justice, headed up by Attorney General Eric
Holder and the FBI, led (more like misled) by Robert S. Mueller, has
been illegally spying on journalists, among them those at the Associated
Press. This constitutes an egregious abuse of power. The Judiciary
Report has been proven correct again in another scandal the site and
its affiliate Sound Off Column broke first in 2006, regarding the
FBI/DOJ spying on journalists:

FBI
Reproved For Spying On Journalists: "According to DOJ
Inspector General, Glenn A. Fine's testimony in Congress this week, the
FBI, headed by psycho, Robert S. Mueller, has been spying on
journalists and bloggers in America, in violation of the U.S.
Constitution, as the Judiciary Report and its sister site, The Sound
Off Column, have stated for years" ).

FBI
To Be Called Before Congress Over Spying: As I
accurately told my readers in December 2006 which was confirmed in
March 2007, the FBI has been spying on Americans and US residents, via
abusing the Patriot Act to unlawfully read emails, scan bank accounts,
check people's credit and wiretap citizens' phones – actions
inherently illegal in the United States. Even more recently, I wrote
again on July 24, 2008, that President George Bush "Spied on
American citizens and residents whenever he felt like, via illegal
wiretapping, email snooping and scanning bank accounts
(FBI)."

It was revealed this week, the FBI and its parent agency, the
Department of Justice, have been wiretapping and obtaining the phone
records of Associated Press reporters, in conduct that has shocked the
newsgathering agency into outrage. They are looking for tips, scoops
and advanced warnings of potentially incendiary political
stories/scandals, with the hope of cutting them off at the pass (so
much for free press). As stated above, for years the Judiciary Report
has repeatedly written on the site that the FBI/DOJ are
unconstitutionally spying on journalists.

I found this out the hard way. The problem began when I was
interviewed by the FBI in November 2005, after sending in a formal
complaint about illegal wiretapping, phone hacking, hacking and
criminal copyright infringement regarding Madonna and her associates in
Hollywood (and she has a long history of stealing people's copyrights).
I had to go to the FBI, as Congress mandates incidents of copyright
infringement, especially criminal copyright infringement, must be
investigated by the FBI. Under the law, they are the agency that has
jurisdiction in said matters.

However, I'm not an FBI tipster or informant, never been paid by the
agency, as all I revealed to them was said due to my repulsion at being
victimized by the aforementioned people in Hollywood. I was promised
the standard report on their investigation into the aforementioned
criminal misconduct by Madonna, but headquarters in Washington kyboshed
the report the Miami FBI promised, due to the head of the agency, Robert S.
Mueller, having accepted a large bribe from Madonna, according to one
of my credible sources.

While I certainly do not work as a mainstream journalist, my
websites have broken a number of scandals,
based on accurate information I either experienced firsthand or
received from one of my credible sources. This led the FBI to illegally
wiretapping my phones and contacting the hosting company for my
websites, to give them copies of all my emails.

The reason I found out about the FBI spying on journalists is right
after I was interviewed by the agency, I discovered they illegally
wiretapped my phones and contacted the hosting company for my websites,
ordering them to regularly give the FBI copies of all my emails.

The FBI has been using me as an informant against my will via
illegal wiretapping, hacking and email box snooping and scraping (the
contents), as I complained to a federal judge in writing in 2009‘s Aisha
v. FBI.

Just because someone is connected and breaks
stories online, does not give one the right to
unconstitutionally spy into their life for tips for your own
investigations. The FBI tried to turn me into a government
snitch/informant against my will, via mining all my communications
for information.

Astute and credible tips I received that I placed in articles to be
published on my sites, particularly the Judiciary Report, were accessed
by the FBI, then used before they were published on my sites. I also
speak to people over the telephone who are well-connected in political
and business circles. I began to notice items from my telephone calls
with said people (and time stamped emails) were also being used by the
FBI shortly after. They latched on and refuse to let go.

For example, a few years ago I opened an ETrade brokerage account. I
wanted to see how their system worked, as I have an interest in the
stock market. Along the way I noticed a few issues/problems. One
problem I spoke about over the phone with an ETrade representative. Shortly
after, the FBI raided ETrade in a criminal case running along the same
lines of what I complained about over the phone.

In another incident, someone I know in Miami was crossing the street
and was hit by a car. A lawyer whom she'd never heard of before, sent
her a solicitation letter, telling her about the accident and
requesting she retain him as a legal representative with the intent to
sue. She forwarded the letter to my mom and I and we thought it strange
that a lawyer did this out of nowhere. We also discussed the matter
over the phone (albeit, the phone wiretapped by the FBI and separately,
Madonna's private investigator).

At the time of my friend's injury, I was regularly going to Jackson Memorial
Hospital, while recovering from an aneurysm I had in 2008. The next
thing I knew, the FBI raided the aforementioned lawyer's office and
Jackson Memorial Hospital, arresting people, stating he was soliciting clients
illegally and using information he obtained via bribing someone at
Jackson Memorial Hospital. This lawyer had been doing this for a while,
yet it wasn't until my family discussed it over the phone that the FBI
opened a case and raided the lawyer and hospital.

In another incident, I began complaining about Gibson Guitars to my
dad over the phone. I'd called Gibson about a potential deal and they
stated they have a program for new artists, know who I am (which
surprised me at the time) and I am eligible for said program, which
would include a spot on their website and opening for Lenny Kravitz as
apart of a showcase they were putting together.

Madonna got wind of it and began harassing them into dropping me.
Shortly after, they dropped me, when Gibson and I had agreed via email
to me using their guitars in a music video and over the phone on the
Kravitz promo tour (Kravitz is one of Madonna's friends and many years
ago she broke up his marriage to Lisa Bonet, via a brazen case of
adultery).

Not long after the Gibson incident, the FBI, who was watching the
whole thing, monitoring my calls and emails, raided Gibson, who became
royally ticked off at it and lashed out online. The FBI complained
about Gibson's guitars and illegal, protected materials the company was
secretly using to make them.

In another incident, regarding a man one of my sources mentioned to
me over the phone, denouncing his seriously bad behavior the individual
was secretly engaging in, not long after, the U.S. federal
government, FBI included, arrested and convicted him on whopping
charges (drugs and violence). I'd never heard of the man prior to the
phone call, as his name was not in the public domain in terms of news
sites and blogs.

There are a number of other examples regarding me either calling or
emailing a company or speaking to a source about someone and then
shortly after, the FBI investigating then raiding them out of nowhere.
When something happens over a dozen times, it is not a coincidence.
These incidents and others will be outlined in my forthcoming film
"Justice And Truth."

As mentioned on the site previously, at times I've done what is
known as a "poor man's copyright" via emailing an item to my
email box, to create an automatic time stamp and date of authorship. I
sometimes do this before actually sending a copyright to the Library of
Congress in Washington, D.C. for registration.

On several occasions, the FBI took items from my preexisting, emailed,
time stamped "poor man's copyrights" apart of film scripts
and their accompanying synopses and used them without permission for
stories on www.FBI.gov as
imagined/fictional examples of scenarios where the FBI's skills are
needed in America for national security and criminal investigation. All
time stamped instances of this misconduct, showing the emails and
dates, then the FBI's articles and subsequent date, are included in
great comparative detail in the film "Justice
And Truth."

Then there's the FBI's habit of chronically following me around and
at times approaching me in public with questions, like I work for them,
when I don't. Things got to a point that I began using public payphones
for privacy, due to the wiretap on my home and mobile phones (how
ironic and oxymoronic that one can pay DSL internet and mobile phone
fees to have no privacy). A phone tech I paid to check my phone line
informed me that the wiretap on my phone line is from "Washington"
as in the FBI and that's not something he can remove.

In one incident, I went to a payphone near my former home in Miami
Shores to make a call in private and a tall, hulking federal agent
wearing a suit and driving a black SUV with a badge in it, drove up and
stood feet away from me, smiling and staring at me whilst trying to
listen to my phone conversation. The way he rushed up behind me was
unreal.

I was speaking to an adviser at a Christian church for guidance on a
spiritual matter that I did not want recorded on the unconstitutionally
placed wiretap, but so determined is the FBI about mining my emails and
calls for scoops and tips, they followed me to the payphone.

In another incident, I was in my front yard gardening and a federal
agent in a suit walked right up to me (also known as trespassing) and
began questioning me about what my future plans are. It was during the
time I began discussing with my dad the option of moving, due to the
criminal harassment and invasion of privacy from Madonna’s Kabbalah
cult. The wiretap picked it up and the next thing I knew, a federal
agent was on my lawn questioning me about my future and my thoughts on
the future of politics in the country.

Now they keep harassing my friends, to ask me the same question,
"What are your future plans?" as the FBI panicked when I went
to London last year, thinking I wasn't coming back, because I bought an
open ticket online with no return date (wasn't sure how long the
purpose of my business trip would be - why buy a plane ticket, pick a
date that is too soon to return, then get hit with a $100 - $150 change
fee).

As stated previously on the site, when I went to London, England in
April of 2012 for months, leaving from Washington, D.C., the FBI's
sister agency, Homeland Security surprised me with what they asked.
Several other people were in front of me in the line, who were U.S.
citizens and were not asked the same thing.

The other U.S. citizens in the line were asked simple question like
do they need to check any bags. When it was my turn, the man looked at
me like he knew me and said in a strange way, "Ah, Miss Goodison,
but the question is when are you coming back." By right, British
passport control should have asked me about the duration of my stay,
not U.S. Homeland Security, as I'm a U.S. citizen.

When I was in London last year, I was approached by an FBI rep once
again, but that time asking when I was coming back to America. I'm not
a criminal. I have no criminal record and have kept my hands clean, as
I am a Christian. The FBI have no right to be doing this looking for
scoops and investigative tips to build cases around. It is
unconstitutional and unethical. I'm tired of the lack of privacy.

STORY SOURCE

Associated Press: Feds Secretly Obtained Reporter
Phone Logs

May 13, 2013 6:35 PM - The Associated Press news agency says that
the Department of Justice secretly obtained two months of telephone
records on 20 lines used by its reporters and editors...

"There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad
collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and
its reporters," he said in the letter. "These records
potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all
of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month
period, provide a road map to AP's newsgathering operations, and
disclose information about AP's activities and operations that the
government has no conceivable right to know." The Justice
Department reportedly obtained calls for 20 phone lines, including the
House of Representatives press gallery.