Tuesday, February 26, 2013

HAMAS KILLERS OF ISM ACTIVIST VITTORIO ARRIGONI GET SENTENCES REDUCED FROM LIFE TO 15 YEARS BY GAZA MILIATRY COURT.

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA

THERE'S NOTHING MORE STUPID THAN AN ISM ACTIVIST. THESE LITTLE TWERPS RUN AROUND CHANTING VERBIAGE ABOUT "RESISTANCE" AND
HUMAN RIGHTS AS THEY CHAMPION CUTTHROATS FROM TOTALITARIAN REGIMES LIKE HAMAS AND HEZBOLLAH.

ARRIGONI WAS BEATEN AND HANGED BY THE GREAT PALESTINIAN REVOLUTION HE SO LOVINGLY SUPPORTED. HIS KILLERS' LAWYER COMPLAINED THE LIFE SENTENCE WAS REDUCED TO ONLY 15 YEARS WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN TEN.

ODDS ARE THEY WILL BE FREED ON GOOD BEHAVIOR BY 2015.

TO TRISTAN ANDERSON, RACHEL CORRIE, TOM HURNDALL AND ANY OF THE OTHER ISM MORONS WHO DIED OR FACE INJURY FOR THEIR TIRELESS EFFORTS TO SUPPORT ARAB TERRORISTS AND MURDERERS, WE HOLD UP VITTORIO'S JUSTICE AS PROOF YOU ARE ALL FOOLS.

HIS TATOO READS IN ARABIC "RESISTANCE"

IT WAS GREAT FUN WHILE IT LASTED AGAINST THE JEWS

ARRIGONI ONCE SAID HE WAS LIVING AND SUPPORTING THE HAMAS BECAUSE HIS GRANDFATHER WAS A PARTISAN AGAINST THE NAZIS.

NEVER MIND THAT THE HAMAS-A LATER PART OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD THAT WERE NAZI ALLIES DURING WORLD WAR II-

Saturday, February 9, 2013

New update on Anna Baltzer here:

AN OPEN CHALLENGE LETTER TO
ANNA BALTZER (OR IS IT PILLER? OR IS IT NARDIE? OR IS IT ISHKABIBBBLE?)

For those of you following my work exposing
the International Solidarity Movement
you may have seen the brouhaha about my
latest article about Anna Baltzer of the US Campaign to End the Israeli
Occupation. If you scroll down to my past articles about
Anna here on my
blog, you can learn more about her. To brief those not in the know,
I wrote
an article where I said Anna lied about having a Fulbright Scholarship and attending
Birthright, tales she uses to pose as the Jew who wants to bring down Israel for
Hamas.

Well, it turns out she had her real name as Anna Piller instead of Baltzer on the Fulbright website where it mentioned she was given some funds to be a TA (teaching assistant) to teach English in an English language program at a Turkish university,
and may have
even been at Birthright (I'm still waiting for proof), but under a completeley
different name, Anna Piller. It was already established she never went on Brithright as Anna Baltzer per the Birthright Program. Anna did not get and is not a Fulbright Scholars who receive scholarships to either attend school to get a degree, do specific research or a dissertation. Because of this difference, Anna's name still does not appear on the Fulbright Scholars list on the Fulbright website under either name, Baltzer of Piller. So she lied about being a Fulbright Scholar, exaggerating her connections to Fulbright. This hoax was perpetrated by anarchist Daniel Sierdaski who wrote my editors and told them she was.

Needless to say, the ISM trolls on the
Internet are crowing about the fact she did have some connection to Fulbright in her background
and that that somehow disproves all the pro-terrorist activities I've proven about the ISM
over the last ten years and that she is a serial liar. The article in question
was pulled by one panicky publisher who was afraid of a lawsuit over a minor
issue that the anti-Israel trolls tried to make into a major issue--and
succeeded. Anna Baltzer herself never sent any letters, I guess leaving the
threats up to the ISM cultists to do it for her. The rest of the information about how Anna lies in the articles in
question were true to the T, though. Anna just finished last week telling an audience at
Oxford yet another lie that Israel is the same as apartheid 1980's South Africa.
She went to Belgium on February 4th to tell assorted atrocity lies about Israel to
further spur anti-Semitism in Europe among Christians there.

Anyway, I thought I'd write Anna
Baltzer an OPEN LETTER here on my blog and those ISM trolls out there who are
living on the Internet for her can, and I am sure will, show it to her. I hope
the ISM trolls and my followers will disseminate this far and
wide:

AN OPEN LETTER CHALLENGE TO ANNA BALTZER
(sic)

Ms. Baltzer (or is it Piller? Nardi?):

It has come to my
attention that even though the Fulbright websites and staff advised me there was
no Anna Baltzer who obtained a Fulbright scholarship in 2003 as your Wikpedia
entry said you did at the time I wrote my article about your going to
Oxford (which I understand is now changed saying you are also known as Anna
Piller), why do you permit all the public relations articles put out by the ISM
for you to say "Anna Baltzer received a Fulbright Scholarship"? In fact, why do
you even need to use a false name?

As for Birthright, at this writing I'm
waiting to hear back to see if they hosted an Anna Piller in 2000, this query
based on a similar confusion to that above. ISM activists frequently use false
identities to do their work against Israel, even obtaining multiple passports to
get back there after deportation. Is that why you have the false name Anna
Baltzer?

Do you use the name Anna Baltzer because you have a criminal
conviction on your record from 1997 under the name Anna Piller? And what was
that conviction for, pray tell?

Finally, there's the issue of your
grandparents who allegedly were Holocaust survivors.
In my article, I mention
I could find no record of Baltzers who were listed as Holocaust survivors from
the death camps. I found only one woman named Baltzer who did perish during the
Shoah. I imagine she'd object to you using her name.
In my earlier articles
and the ones about you at Oxford, I mentioned Hedy Epstein, the phony "Holocaust
survivor" of the ISM who I learned was never in the death camps and spent the
entire war in the safey of England as a child. Hedy, as an adult after the war
belonged to pro-Stalinist groups that were anti-Zionist (Stalin was actually
planning a new pogrom when he died) and that she even supported Pol Pot. The
liars in the ISM tried parading her out at divestment events hoping audiences
would think a victim of the Nazi death camps even was against the Jewish state.
You know, the same idea behind an anti-Semite like yourself claiming she is
attacking the Jewish people in the name of Arab irredentists, revanchist
idealogues like Hamas so that non-Jews and (other suckers) will not see your
program as promoting hatred for the Jews.

What are the names of your
grandparents who are "Holocaust survivors" and what death camps did they
survive? Surely you'd want this information made public to bolster your
credentials. Do you have the tattooed numbers from their arms to facilitate an
accurate search? You mentioned once you were born in Switzerland. Did your grandparents spend the war there? I await a reply.

How much do you earn as the head of
the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation?
My research tells me that ISM
coordinators like you are paid $60,000 a year from the the likes of the PLO.
With all your world travel, etc. I'd imagine you must be paid far more. Do you
mind telling the world your income for this sinecure you have as the Jew
who
works to deport other Jews from their homes and supports terrorist groups that
calls for killing them? You are also involved with Medea Benjamin's Code Pink
and Global Exchange, that wonderful group that sent $600,000 to the Iraqi
resistance in aid
while US marines were dying and losing limbs during the
Battle for Fallujah. I'm curious how much it costs to buy a pretty "Jewish"
girl (are you really even Jewish?)
to serve as a mouthpiece for destroying
the Jews in the Middle East first and stir anti-Semitism in colleges, meeting
halls and most of all in Christian churches. Can you divulge this information?
It migh shed light on your epiphany and statements you are promoting Jewish
values by supporting and lying for Jew-killers like Hamas.

Finally, can
you answer these three questions below, though I already know the
answers:

Have you read the Hamas Charter and its calls to annihilate all
the Jews in the world as well as Israel as a religious obligation to God and do
you agree with it? In other words,
will you condemn Hamas as a terrorist
group?

Does Israel have a right to exist as it is, the Jewish national
homeland? (You apparenly refused to answer this earlier on the Daily Show with
Jon Stewart which was an obvious "no". I suppose you couldn't risk your sinecure
from the Arabs who pay you by saying that Israel has any right to
exist.)

For what crime were you convicted in 1997 when you were about 18
years old? Was it serious? Was it for fraud? For what were you convicted back
then? Is that why you began using aliases?

The only persons I know who
use aliases are criminals and celebrities. Was it the former that became the
reason "Anna Baltzer" was coined? Or the latter, so you could become famous as
the Jew for another Jewish Holocaust? Curious minds want to know. I note this
article from 2006 that says Anna Baltzer is your real name and Piller the alias.
Why did you change it?

Thursday, February 7, 2013

THIS ARTICLE BELOW WAS LINKED TO FROM ANNA BALTZER'S WIKIPEDIA PAGE BUT NOW WHEN SOMEONE CLICKS THE LINK IT SAYS PAGE NOT FOUND. I AM REPRINTING IT HERE. READERS WHO KNOW WIKIPEDIA EDITORS SHOULD CONTACT THEM AND ASK THEM TO CHANGE THE LINK AT THE BOTTOM OF BALTZER'S WIKIPEDIA PAGE
THAT REFERS TO THIS ARTICLE TO THE USED NOW. BE SURE TO READ MY OPEN CHALLENGE LETTER TO ANNA BALTZER TWO ARTICLES BACK.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Anna Baltzer at the Berkeley
Sabeel Conference

I'd never seen Anna Baltzer in action though
I'd read about her. At the Sabeel Conference at St. John the Workers Church in
Berkeley Ms. Baltzer gave a presentation in the main hall.

Baltzer is
drop dead gorgeous and looks like a movie star, but she is also proof that
beauty is only skin deep. Her presentation on behalf of the International
Women's Peace Service was so dishonest and deliberately manipulative of an
audience that it reveals an ugliness below the surface appearance of this woman.
Innuendos, half-truths, manipulated photos and constant misrepresentations were
the order of the day for her presentation, and most annoying was her voicing "I
am a Jewish-American" to lend credence to her pro-PLO propaganda spiel; here was
a Jewish woman content to lie by omitting facts and giving credence to hearsay
to aid in the dispossession of and encourage attacks on Jews in
Israel.

First, let me say the International Women's Peace Service is a
communist organization that grew out of the communist-inspired International
Women's League for Peace and Freedom in the 1920s and 30's. Back here in
California, the IWPS tours schools, damning Israel in the eyes of schoolchildren
just like Baltzer does and is led by another Jewess-communist named Kate
Raphael. It's not particularly Jewish to be a communist whack job, but if one
is, then it's useful to cite one's ancestry of Judaism that was long abandoned
for the god of Marxism to attack the Jews in Israel and those who support them.
Israel was founded and built by more than one Marxist who grew up during the
Cold War, and the Soviet Union once supported the creation of the Jewish state
because of the socialist nature of so many Zionist groups. The Torah teaches
that every Jew is responsible for every other Jew, a form of socialism that has
a beneficial group-think on the Jewish community.

But what frequently
happens is it gets perverted among secular Jews who decide that Marxism is the
way to go. They become about as Jewish as a ham sandwich, but nevertheless use
their Jewish ancestry to lend credibility to attacking Jewish interests like
Israel as they fall into the communist party platform that is anti-Israel. As
the Soviet Union later aligned with the Arabs, Marxist groups like the IWPS
became increasingly "anti-Zionist" (anti-Jew). Writer Paul Bogdaner has posited
that "Martin Luther’s program of terrorizing Jews originated with a Jewish
convert, Johannes Pfefferkorn; and that the myth of the Jewish world-conspiracy,
which culminated in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, was assiduously
promoted by a Russian Jewish author, Jacob Brafmann. We suspected that as the
Pfefferkorns and the Brafmanns departed from the stage, the Finkelsteins and the
Chomskys made their entrance."

As for the "peace" theme of the IWPS,
Writer Bruce Bawer has explained that "use of the word 'peace' to legitimize
totalitarianism is an old Communist tradition. In August 1939, when the Nazis
and Soviets signed their nonaggression pact, the same Western Stalinists who had
been calling for war against Germany did an about-face and began to praise
peace. (After Hitler invaded Russia, the Stalinists reversed themselves again,
demanding that the West help Stalin crush the Third Reich.) The peace talk, in
short, was really about sympathizing with Communism, not peace. And it continued
after the war, when Stalin’s Western supporters whitewashed his monstrous regime
and denounced anti-Communists as warmongering crypto-fascists. 'Peace
conferences' and 'friendship committees' drew hordes of liberal dupes, who
didn’t grasp that their new 'friends' were not ordinary Russians but the jailers
of ordinary Russians—and that the committees were about not 'friendship' but
deception, exploitation, and espionage."

I'll write more about IWPS later
and particularly Hannah Mermelstein, a member who for some reason the Israeli
security services just can't stop from entering Israel to try and destroy it.

But back to Anna Baltzer's presentation.

Baltzer immediately
claimed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was not about religion, but land. In
other words, the Arabs, particularly the Muslims, have nothing against Jews per
se, but their land is being stolen by them. This was the first lie. The
settlements that Baltzer showed photos of were built on public Jordanian land
after 1967. It's one of the deceptive lies of the ISM (as a front for the PLO)
to claim that Jews just marched in and grabbed private Palestinian homes and
property.

It's always fascinated me how in America we accept the right
of anyone who can legally purchase his own property to live where he pleases.
This was the basis of our Civil Rights Movement. But when the Arabs claim that
land is only for Arabs or Muslims, the radical left rushes in to agree with
them.

In any event, Baltzer pointed to a settlement and said "Only Jews
can live there." This was the second lie of her presentation and it was
deliberate, a variation on the Blood Libel stories (which Baltzer improved on
later as we shall see).

What Baltzer should have said was only Israeli
citizens can live there. Christians, Druze, Muslims with Israeli citizenship can
live in those communities. Were the Palestinian Authority to arrest terrorists
and stop killing Israelis, mainly Jews,
those communities might then become
open to all Palestinian citizens in a viable Palestinian state. But for now,
they are under the control of Israel for security reasons, and rightly
so.

Baltzer commented about the land around the settlement in the photo
and claimed it belonged to Palestinians. This was the third lie. The land
belonged to the settlement. But to these ISM creeps, all land, trees, produce
(olives) and just about anything a Palestinian tells them is theirs and not the
Jews'; it all belongs to Palestinians.

Baltzer accurately explained the
difference between economic settlers and the religious ones. Economic settlers
moved to the West Bank for affordable housing whereas the religious came to
resettle the Biblical land of Israel. But in true
radical socialist
propagandistic form, Baltzer suggested that the economic settlers were only the
oppressed in Israel,that is, the poor, the black Jews from Ethiopia, etc. In
fact, Israel is so tiny that this is not true. Many people elect to live in the
West Bank or east Jerusalem who are not impoverished but want a nicer home.
Efrat is like Mission Viejo in California and only a 30 minute drive from
Jerusalem (if you don't get shot by Arab terrorists on the way).

Baltzer
then discussed the Security Fence (that the ISM loves to call the "Apartheid
Wall"). Of course she doesn't mention the Fence became necessary because the
Palestinian Authority refused to arrest or prosecute terrorists who murder
Jews
(and still never has) despite their agreement to do so in the Oslo
Accords. There hasn't been a bus bombing in Israel for two years since the Fence
went up. The answer is simple; stop killing Israelis and the Fence will come
down, it's mostly portable anyway. Baltzer relied on lying by omission
throughout the presentation.

By the way, Baltzer kept reciting the trope
of "occupation." Would she object to a Security Fence if it was on the 1949
Green Line? Probably so, because she wanted people to think she considers only
the West Bank and Gaza "occupied" when in fact she means all of Israel.

I
had to laugh when Baltzer showed a photograph of two cars with different colored
license plates. She explained that somehow this reflected an apartheid
situation
because the different colored plates for Israeli nationals (not
just Jews) and Palestinian Arabs were "visible from far away to the
checkpoints." In fact, it was the PA that demanded the different colored license
plates, not the Israeli government, because it was demanded as a matter of
sovereignty. But her audience would never know this.

Baltzer showed a
staged photograph of a "bypass road" with another highway excavation site in the
foreground. The manipulation of images was obvious.
She was honest at one
point admitting Palestinians who are not Israelis can use the bypass roads after
completing a security background check; the roads were created to stop Jews from
being murdered on the highways. Somehow this was a terrible thing to
her.

But Baltzer's theatrics really shone in discussing the checkpoints.
I've been to Israel and checkpoints rarely take more than ten minutes unless a
terrorist attack is being thwarted. Baltzer showed a line of Palestinian workers
waiting to enter Israel. You can see such lines at our own airports. She implied
this was part of the great suffering of the Palestinians due to those nasty
Israelis having checkpoints to stop terrorists who kill Jew and Arab
alike.

She got the audience of Christian anti-Semites, dried up 60's
Berkeley radicals and the uninformed to emit a gasp when she told them a tale of
a pregnant Palestinian woman who was taken by ambulance to one of the
checkpoints that are normally open to traffic from 7 am to 7 pm. According to
Baltzer, they arrived at the checkpoint before 7 am and the Israeli soldiers
told the woman's family that despite her giving birth they could not let her
through until 7 am. "They kept saying, 'We are just following orders. Just
following orders,'" she announced, in a deliberate reference to Nazi army
apologists over the Holocaust.

She went on to say the woman gave birth to
twins in the ambulance, and after more waiting for hours, finally allowed to
proceed at 7 am but both preemies died before she reached the
hospital.

After her speech, I approached Baltzer. "Can you give me the
name, the checkpoint,
the date and tell me what the IDF investigation of the
incident showed?" I asked her.
"I didn't know the IDF investigates such
things," she replied. "It's hard to imagine nobody complained, and the Arabs
would never miss a sound bite like Israeli soldiers letting two babies die in
the press, so there would have been an investigation," I told
her.

Pressing on, I asked Baltzer for the woman's name. "Lamis," she
said. But she could not give me a last name. "The village?" I pressed on. "Deir
Balut," she said, but she could not provide a date. "It's in my book," she said,
conveniently on sale in the church's vestibule. She grabbed a copy of Witness in
Palestine, her "book" chronicling Israeli abuses and "apartheid." "I can't find
the date, but I think it was the day before the date of this chapter," she said,
being specific. "Were you there when this happened? Did you interview any of the
soldiers?" I asked.

"No" she replied.

"So in other words somebody
whose last name you don't know or remember told you this happened and it's
listed as fact in your book?"

She drifted away into the crowd.

I
should point out the last photo in her manipulated scenes at this event. Baltzer
displayed a photo of a Palestinian teenager on a hill throwing a rock at some
Israeli police officers at the bottom of the hill who were peacefully standing
next to their vehicles. "I don't want to seem to be promoting violence," she
said. "But this boy is in his village on his land and the Israeli police have no
right to be there." She continued, "If someone broke into your home and invaded
it, wouldn't you pick up a lamp and throw it at them to protect your home?" In
other scenes where she claimed they showed Palestinians "nonviolently"
protesting the "occupation," the Hamas flag was clearly visible in the rear.
Hamas in its charter openly advocates the annihilation of Israel's
Jews.

So much for the theme of nonviolence at this Sabeel event.
Baltzer's remarks were little more than an excuse, a justification, for
terrorism while trying to lie about phony Israeli atrocities. It was manipulated
tripe, but the audience still gave her a standing ovation.

9 comments:

One of the reason the big oil
folks fund these conferences is to get everyone on the same page with the new,
improved Palestinian narrative. (Its a narrative, folks, not "history"- because
it didn't actually happen, but we can't let the facts get in our way now, can
we?)

The "powers that be" are introducing important changes in the
"narrative" as to the origins of the Palestinian people.

For instance-
were you told to claim that the Palestinians were the descendants of the
Philistines? That didn't work too well, did it? The Philistines themselves were
of European origins, and never expanded their kingdom beyond the Southern
Mediterranean coast. They weren't Semitic, they were uncircumsized...too
problematic....

So the folks in the myth and legend department of the
Palestinian propaganda ministry have a new narrative now- better get on the same
page, boys and girls.

The Palestinians are now descended from the
Phoenicians. Remember that. Be consistent. Sabeel says so. And don't forget- you
heard it here first, folks

BECKY JOHNSON COMMENTS ON SELECTIONS FROM ANNA BALTZER'S "The Forgotten
Torture Chambers, Walls, and Economics of the Occupation" -- May 15,
2007

ANNA BALTZER WRITES: "Along our tour we met a farmer named Abu
Hashem who used to be one of the richest landowners in Palestine.

BECKY:
Does Baltzer have any independent verification of this? Or is she simply
accepting his version on its face and reporting it as though its a
fact?

ANNA BALTZER: "Of his 8,000 original dunums, only 70 are left after
Israel built what Fathi calls, "the Forgotten Wall." East of the major settler
highway is a barrier similar in shape and effect to Israel's better-known
Apartheid Wall, this one built back in 1971 and reinforced in 1999. From his
modest house, Abu Hashem can see past the Wall across the thousands of his
dunums that he can never return to, spanning all the way to the Jordan
River."

BECKY: If this Abu Hashem (or Father God) truly had his land
taken by Israel for a security barrier, then this was done under the laws of
eminent domain of the State of Israel. Landowners are compensated for land taken
at fair market values. Most likely this farmer didn't really own the land, but
was squatting. He should count himself lucky that he got to use the land for his
own purposes as long as he did.

ANNA BALTZER: "Abu Hashem's sons
alternate years going to university and working on the farm to support the
family. Abu Hashem would hire Palestinian laborers so his sons could study
full-time, but Israel prohibits Palestinians from bringing in outside
workers.

BECKY: There is no such prohibition. However, the IDF does check
permits and ID's of Palestinians passing back and forth. Those who present a
security risk or are wanted by Israel, don't dare go thru the
checkpoints.

ANNA BALTZER: "Another farmer we met said he needs 50
farmers to cultivate his land, but he only has 10, since so many locals have
left. Settlements, on the other hand, are free to bring in as much cheap labor
from the rest of the West Bank as they like, so long as the Palestinians head
back west when they're done so as not to throw off the Judaizing demographic
trend."

BECKY: Israel COULD have taken over the West Bank and kicked out
ALL the Arabs in 1967 (As Jordan had done to all the Jews when they took over in
1948)but they didn't. Since the presence of employment is the largest incentive
for immigration, it's mystifying why "so many locals have left." Baltzer blames
Israel but it doesn't make much sense. The Jordan Valley was always a scarsely
populated area.
As for a so-called "Judaizing demographic trend" Baltzer
plays the race card.

Here she claims that because Jewish settlers hire
Palestinian workers for seasonal labor, this "proves" that Israel bases all of
its policies on "Judaizing" areas of Israel. This is disingenuous to a high
degree. For its illegal to discriminate in Israel based on race or religion.

ANNA BALTZER: "Settlements are towns or communities built by Israel
exclusively for Jewish Israelis on land outside the internationally recognized
borders of Israel. Settlements are in violation of Article 49 of the Fourth
Geneva Convention, which prohibit an occupying power from transferring citizens
from its own population to the occupied territory, in this case the West Bank
and Gaza. In many languages, the word for “settlement” is the same as the word
for “colony.” But in English and Hebrew, a more benign word is used—people
living in Israeli settlements are referred to as “settlers,” not
“colonizers.”

BECKY: There ARE no "internationally recognized borders."
That is part of the reason the conflict never gets settled. Baltzer may be
referring to the 1949 cease-fire lines which are not official borders. In 1948,
Jordanian armies drove out all Jews from the West Bank and Jerusalem. In 1967,
when the Israeli army took control of Jerusalem, the West Bank, and parts of
Jordan, Jews re-entered the West Bank to repopulate ancient Judea with Jews per
their religious teachings. This did NOT violate Article 49 of the Geneva
convention because 1) Israel was not the aggressor in the 1967 war,but were
ruled to be the defenders and 2) no resident Arab/Muslim population was
transferred OUT nor internally displaced. These Jews started new communities in
their ancestral homelands on uninhabited land displacing no one. 3) UN
resolution 242 left the Israeli army in charge until a peace agreement could be
reached. Israel has already reached a peace agreement with Jordan and Egypt.
they tried to reach an agreement with the Palestinians with the Oslo agreement,
but Arafat failed to stop Palestinian terrorism and in 2000, Arafat launched his
bloody intifada.

I hardly know where to begin to respond to all of the inaccuracies in
Kaplan's post. Just about every quotation is incorrect, and I invite readers to
view the same presentation online at YouTube to compare (there's even a DVD of
the Sabeel conference coming out).

Along with my presentation, I provided
a fact-sheet to back up all my statistics (I mentioned this at the end), using
sources such as the UN OCHA, Amnesty International, Middle East Policy Council,
and other human rights groups. I invite others to download the fact-sheet off my
website as well. As I said in my presentation, I actually hope that people don't
take my word for it, and instead do the research themselves, but from reliable
sources.

Interestingly, I didn't see any references to Kaplan's
assertions. For things on which we disagree I would happily refer to sources, if
he'd provided any.

In terms of things not immediately refuted by seeing
the presentation itself--and I'll skip the Communist hoopla since it has nothing
to do with me or my work--I want to reassert to Kaplan, as I did after the talk,
that I interviewed Lamis the day after the incident in which she lost her
babies. I also wrote about it in my book and on my blog, and have verified that
the entry date to which I referred Kaplan was correct (December 21st, 2003).

This should also be verifiable in the IWPS archives (if the ones online
don't go back that far I'm sure you could write and request the human rights
reports written that week). When Kaplan asked, I said that to my knowledge there
had been no investigation conducted by the army on the incident (I didn't say
they never investigate--in fact, I've written stories including such
investigations).

That said, I hope I was wrong and invite Kaplan to send
me the results of the investigation that he seems certain occurred.

I can
only assume Kaplan will delete this entry, but thought I'd put it up for as long
as it lasts.

Again, don't trust me. But don't trust Kaplan either. Find
out for yourselves, and use reliable sources that exist to document the
situation, not to advance an agenda.

Anna, the ball is in your court: Provide me
with Lamis's last name, the exact date and I will galdly research this incident
with the IDF. The fact is, you are a serial liar for the PLO. Your presentation
was pure propaganda
and designed to misinform those who attended. By the
way, how do you account for the Hamas flags in those phtoos of "nonviolent"
Palestinians you displayed? Read th Hamas charter.

I never said that you
were a communist yourself, Anna, because I really don't know you. However, the
organization you speak on behalf of is a communist front group dating back to
the 1930s. I rather think you confirmed what I thought about you, but did not
write: You are a young Jewish-American woman who has found a sinecure for
herself and limited prestige as a published author by being a quisling for the
Arabs against other Jews int eh Middle East. That, to me, is far worse than
being a true believer as a communist.

Please note also I did not delete
your entry. That is the style of the ISM creeps you work for, not me.

The basic facts of the matters in the Middle East are a mystery to the world.
The Arabs are successful in many decades of de-legitimization propaganda against
the Jews, and numerous acts of fabricating “news”, to create this affect.
Scrutinizing every little story and placing it in perspective is a complicated
task, even for a professional historian.

Now try this – ask any Arab
speaker

“What borders of Israel do you accept as legitimate?”

The
answer depends on how manipulative he/she is… The fact is, Arabs do not accept
ANY legitimacy of Israeli existent. In total defiance of international law (At
the same time, they rush to make manipulative use of it to promote a cause which
contradicts it in the first place…)

Arabs are consistent. They strive to
achieve genocide of all Jews, long before the state of Israel was established.
They were allies of the Nazis back in WWII, and after this plot failed, they
“joined in” with the Soviets (Masking their activities as “freedom struggle”
,and used socialist terms) they trained in the USSR, and got full support there,
in weapons & finance. Then when this failed, they join in with the
Iranians…. (“Hamas” is fully financed & trained by the Shia of
Iran).

Arabs are quick to demand “equality” in a Jewish state, masking
their true goals in the false claim of “human rights struggle”. The very same
Arabs have nothing to say to the fact Jews were second degree “citizens” under
Islamic rule (“Dhimmies” ), and suffered immensely from Islamic fundamentalism
which swept the Islamic world in waves throughout it’s history (no, it is not a
new phenomenon…). I would recommend the book on Islam, by Prof. Karsh (head of
Middle Eastern studies in the University of London), and watch this video -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3pq1KIUZb4&feature=related

I agree with Kaplan's assertions, and additionally, if you view the UN data,
and look at the percentage breakdowns of casualties in the conflict, you'll see
that approximate Israeli deaths are 50-50%, indicative of attacks on unarmed
civilian populations; Palestinian deaths are 97-3% men to women, indicative of
attacks on ARMED COMBATANTS.

I just had to sit through Baltzer
today--she never onced mentioned the many unprovoked attacks on Israel in 1948,
1967, 1973 by Arab countries, which allowed Israel to expand its territory
legally. She also engages in the same rhetoric battle that the sides she opposes
use, calling her grandparents "Holocaust refugees", not survivors, thus trying
to group the Jewish struggles as the SAME as the Palestinian struggle. She also
claimed that both the one state and two state solutions don't work. Seems to me
she just wants Israel to not exist at all?

Lastly, as a Jew I have to say
that I am repulsed by her positions. She may have Jewish blood, but her complete
rejection of a)all religious conveyance of meaning to her ancestry and b)Jewish
claims to the land show just how she can't claim to be Jewish. She uses Judaism
to stamp herself as believable to her supporters, but she is a disgrace to my
faith.

Below is another article I did about Anna Baltzer back in 2007. The ISM and Anna's pals who control her Wikipedia page apparently did something so the link to where the article was at my blog now says page cannot be found. I am reprinting the article here for all to see and notifying Google and blogspot of the tampering. Any of you out there who edit Wikipedia should notify the editors.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

MORE ON ANNA BALTZER, THE
ISM'S EVA BRAUN

Steven Stotsky at CAMERA has written an
excellent review of the ISM/s Eve Braun, Anna Baltzer who tours American churchs
and campuses on behalf of Hamas terrorists for the little commies in the IWPS.
Anna says she's not a communist so we ahve to assume she's jsut a lying
opportunist who has a nice sinecure. What's amazing is how a woman with such a
low IQ can make a good living touring with a propaganda campaign such as hers
with a straight face, telling everyone she is a "peace activist" while
concluding her presentations always jsutifying terrorism and war against Israel.
Anna also likes to say she's an "eyewitness" to Israeli abuses that apparently
only scenarios given her by Lamis Andoni for her to repeat. Lamis Andoni is the
daughter of the PFLP apparatchik Ghassan Andoni who helped found the ISM and
recruit little Jewish wannabe communist revolutionaries to run around for the
totalitarian Arabs.
Anna, have you no shame? Apparently not.

Extreme anti-Israel groups often feature like-minded Jewish individuals
in their campaigns, events and writings. These voices provide a public relations
fig leaf for organizations singling out the Jewish state for one-sided
condemnation. The logic, obviously, is that if Jews themselves are leveling
harsh criticism at Israel, the organization’s own assault must have merit. But
what actually counts in statements about Israel, the Palestinians or any other
topic are the facts of the issue – not the ethnicity, religion or personal
psychology of the speaker.

Anna Baltzer is one such Jewish defamer, a
relative newcomer who tours US campuses, churches and community venues
denigrating Israel with baseless and propagandistic allegations. Her personal
story has a familiar ring; she claims to have been raised on the Zionist dream
but says "vacations" in Iran, Syria and Lebanon and an extended visit to the
West Bank opened her eyes and transformed her into a determined opponent of "the
occupation." Those well versed in the history and contemporary reality of the
conflict will recognize in Baltzer’s presentation a re-packaged version of
standard accusations against the Zionist state.

Equally predictable are
her anecdotal descriptions of Palestinian hardship and alleged Zionist
brutality. Likewise familiar is Baltzer’s invoking of her Jewish roots and
grandparents lost to the Holocaust to establish her supposed moral authenticity.

But family aside, Baltzer’s ideological roots are firmly planted in the
anti-Zionist movement. An acolyte of deceased Israeli radical, Tanya Reinhardt
and Noam Chomsky, she is affiliated with the International Women’s Peace Service
(IWPS), a group closely associated with the International Solidarity Movement.
Her political message closely reflects the official Palestinian line claiming
Israel is a foreign occupier guilty of ethnic cleansing and that the wrongs done
to the Arabs can only be righted by reverting back to a mythological pre-Zionist
Palestinian land.

False claims about land ownership

1) Baltzer
builds her argument against Israel on key historical falsehoods. In a tactic of
propaganda, she repeatedly asserts the falsehood that the West Bank and much of
Israel itself belonged to the Palestinians as though it were commonly accepted
truth. She claims Jewish settlements on the West Bank are illegal according to
international law and the land "belongs to the Palestinians, [and is]
internationally recognized as Palestinian land." None of this is true; in
reality, UN Security Council Resolution 242 (and official United States policy)
characterizes the West Bank and Gaza as disputed territories subject to
negotiation. Many recognized legal experts (including Professors Julius Stone
and Eugene Rostow) argue that the settlements are legal, irrespective of any
political view about the advisability of building or removing them.

2)
Baltzer perpetuates the falsehood that all land not already under Jewish
ownership prior to 1948 belongs to the Palestinians. A series of maps on her Web
site depict the annexation of Palestinian land by Jews. A map labeled 1947 shows
eight percent under Jewish ownership, and incorrectly assigns the remaining 92
percent to the Palestinians. But most of the territory she assigns to the
Palestinians was state-owned property under Turkish and subsequent British and
Jordanian governments. In 1967, when Israel took control of the West Bank and
Gaza in the context of a defensive war, state land came under the sovereignty of
Israel, which is how it remains until a "final status" settlement is achieved.

3) Baltzer further confuses the land issue in alleging Israeli Arabs are
discriminated against because they are barred from owning most of the land. In
reality, within Israel itself, only 6.5 percent of the land is privately owned
and although Arabs constitute 20 percent of the population they own roughly half
of that private property. They have equal access to the remaining roughly 80
percent of land that is government-owned state land. In practice and under new
court rulings Arabs also have access to JNF land which accounts for the
remaining 14 percent.

4) Baltzer makes other bizarre claims about land
in Israel. In her blog she quotes Dr. Salman Abu Sitta, whom she identifies as a
former member of the Palestine National Council, who states,

78% of
[Jewish Israelis] live in 14% of Israel. The remaining 22% of [Jewish Israelis]
live in 86% of Israel's area, which is Palestinian land ...only 200,000 Jews
exploit 17,325 sq. km, which is the home and heritage of 5,248,180 refugees,
crammed in camps and denied the right to return home. (April 30, 2007)
This
absurd assertion denies Jews the right to 86 percent of the land within their
own internationally recognized borders. Tellingly, her repetition of Dr. Sitta’s
claims suggests she sees nothing wrong with reducing Israel into densely
populated "bantustans;" precisely what she accuses Israel of doing to the
Palestinians.

5) Her recapitulation of the events surrounding Israel’s
founding are standard revisionist mythology. She recounts how "the militant
Zionist Irgun and Stern Gang systematically murdered more than 100 men, women,
and children in Deir Yassin" and describes it as "part of a carefully planned
and orchestrated process that would induce the flight of 70% of the native
population to make way for an ethnically Jewish state." (Anna’s blog: April 30,
2007)

And in her DVD, "Life in Occupied Palestine," she asserts:

The majority of the people living on the land the UN designated for a
Jewish state were not Jewish. Zionist forces expelled 750,000 Palestinians from
their homes.
The charge of an orchestrated plan and process to expel
Palestinians has been thoroughly refuted by serious scholars. Professors Efraim
Karsh and Benny Morris, for instance, both reject the charge of an orchestrated
expulsion, and conclude the overwhelming majority of Arabs who fled did so in
the context of war – one launched by Arab armies and militias against the
fledgling Jewish state. Their scholarship is supported by the admissions of Arab
officials that the Arab population was urged to flee by its own leadership.
According to various UN commission reports, between 472,000 and 726,000 Arabs
fled the territory that became Israel. Only a small fraction of these were
physically uprooted by Jewish forces, in most cases to insure critical roadways
remained open during open hostilities.

Demonizing Zionism and defaming
Israelis

1) Predictably, Baltzer casts Zionism as a racist movement.
She describes a Zionist as "someone who supports the idea of an exclusively
Jewish state." This is a baseless distortion of mainstream Zionism. Israel is a
democratic state that protects the rights of all its citizens to freely and
openly practice their religions. According to Freedom House, an organization
that rates political, religious and civic freedoms around the world, Israel is
the only nation in the Middle East to be rated as "Free." Most of the region’s
states were given the lowest rating of "Not Free." (See the Middle East portion
of the Freedom House Map of Freedom reproduced on the left)
One is left to
wonder how Baltzer’s "vacations" in Iran and Syria, nations controlled by
repressive regimes that restrict speech, assembly and the rights of minority
groups, somehow convinced her that Israel was the region’s most serious human
rights violator.

2) Her account of the fighting in Jenin in April
2002 repeats the most outrageous propaganda disseminated by the Palestinian
Authority in the days immediately after the Israeli incursion. She writes in her
blog on November 24, 2003:

Jenin has a reputation for fighting back.
Locals say that in April of 2002, it took 12,000 Israeli troops 8 days to
capture one small section of the city because so many people fought to the
death...
... Soldiers bulldozed homes indiscriminately, without regard to
whether any civilians were still inside...

Israel used bulldozers to
minimize soldier casualties, but no one knows how many Palestinians died in the
attack... Shortly afterward, Israel announced 46 casualties, less than a quarter
of their original estimates. Israeli soldiers’ and Palestinian civilians’
testimonies of unarmed men being executed and bodies being crushed suggest that
this number is wildly inaccurate. Still, Israel maintains that a massacre never
happened at all, and without access to the bodies, nobody can prove that those
who went missing were actually killed.
At the time she wrote this entry, even
HRW and Amnesty International, as well as the UN — all fierce critics of Israel
— had repudiated claims that a massacre had occurred, counting 52 to 57
Palestinian dead along with 23 Israeli soldiers. Most of the Palestinian
fatalities were identified as combatants. The relatively low Palestinian toll
after eight days along with the uncharacteristically high toll of Israeli
soldiers contradicts Baltzer’s narrative. Israel could have limited its own
casualties by resorting to artillery and aerial bombardment, but in order to
minimize Arab civilian casualties, went in on the ground and suffered notable
losses.

3) She criticizes Israel’s security barrier, "the wall" in her
terminology, but avoids any discussion of why it was built. Even Palestinian
Islamic Jihad leader Ramadan Abdallah Shalah acknowledged the effectiveness of
the barrier, stating:
"… For example, they built a separation fence in the
West Bank . We do not deny that it limits the ability of the resistance to
arrive deep within [Israeli territory] to carry out suicide bombing attacks, but
the resistance has not surrendered or become helpless, and is looking for other
ways to cope with the requirements of every stage [of the intifada]…" (Al-Sharq,
March 23, 2008 ).
As an advocate of non-violence, she betrays no ambivalence
in her opposition to the barrier despite the fact that it has saved both Israeli
and Palestinian lives by reducing opportunities for violence to occur. Baltzer’s
determined opposition to the barrier suggests that promoting the political
agenda of "resistance" supercedes any concern for preserving Israeli or
Palestinian lives.

Baltzer’s radicalism and ties to Islamic extremists

1) Baltzer’s rhetoric and writing are a window on the emerging nexus
between the far-left and the Islamic extremists of Hamas. This is exemplified by
her association with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), a radical
group whose members sheltered two British-born terrorists prior to their
carrying out a suicide bombing of an Israeli nightclub in 2003 and who today are
working on behalf of Hamas to undermine Western efforts to isolate that radical
Islamic organization in Gaza.

In her blog, she reveals her participation
in ISM strategy sessions and coordination with its activists. ISM’s claims to
adhere to a non-violent creed are contradicted by the praise its co-founder,
Huwaida Arraf, expressed for suicide bombers:

Nonviolent resistance is
no less noble than carrying out a suicide operation... The Palestinian
resistance must take on a variety of characteristics — both nonviolent and
violent. But most importantly it must develop a strategy involving both
aspects...
2) The relative calm in the West Bank since 2005 and on-going
tenuous efforts by responsible governments to foster cooperation between the
Abbas government and the Israeli government have reduced opportunities for
extremists to instigate "resistance" activities in these areas. Professional
agitators like Baltzer have thus migrated to more extreme opponents of
compromise, like Hamas in Gaza. In 2007, she wrote:

Recently, perhaps
the most paralyzing features of Israel's continued control over Gaza ... is the
US and Israeli-led economic embargo against the Palestinian government since
Hamas' victory last year....the United States, Europe, and Israel ... say they
will only return the Palestinians' lifelines if Hamas agrees to three
conditions: (1) renouncing violence, (2) accepting previous agreements, and (3)
recognizing Israel. These conditions sound reasonable enough, but are painfully
ironic for anyone living on the ground here. True, Hamas has not sworn off
violence once and for all, but neither has Israel! In the past year,
Palestinians have killed 27 Israelis, most of them soldiers. During that same
period of time, Israelis have killed 583 Palestinian civilians (suicide bombers,
fighters or others targeted for assassination are not included). Hamas has held
fairly consistently to a unilateral ceasefire since January 2005, when they
announced their transition from armed struggle to political struggle... Hamas
says it reserves the right to resist violently, but has stopped attacking
Israelis. Israel claims that all it wants is peace, yet the daily invasions and
assassinations continue.

And finally, the last and crucial condition is
that Hamas must recognize Israel. The question is, what exactly is meant by
"Israel"?... Israel has an artificial Jewish majority that was created and is
maintained through various forms of ethnic cleansing. Israel's very existence as
a Jewish state is conditional upon the dispossession and either expulsion or
bantustanization of the indigenous Palestinian population...
Hamas too has
indicated that it would consider peace if Israel withdrew to its internationally
recognized 1967 borders leaving Palestinians with just 22% of their historic
homeland, but Israel says full withdrawal is out of the question. It is Israel
who has yet to recognize Palestine's right to exist, not the other way around.
(April 7, 2007)
Baltzer here adheres closely to Hamas’s narrative of the
conflict. These excerpts from a lengthy blog entry are riddled with deceptive
manipulation of terms. For instance, while Hamas accepts temporary truces it
firmly rejects the right of the Jewish state to exist and refuses to disavow
armed struggle. Recently, when an interviewer asked Hamas political chief,
Khaled Meshal if Hamas could ever accept Israel. He answered,

No, the
question of recognition is out. I have already said we would be able to sign a
truce. There are other formulas, but we have already stated that recognition is
not among them. (Euronews, July 11, 2008)
Nor has Hamas stopped trying to
attack Israel despite Baltzer’s nonsensical claim that Hamas has adhered to the
2005 ceasefire. From January through August 2008 alone, 1087 rockets and 1218
mortar shells were fired on Israel from Hamas-controlled Gaza and Hamas has
taken credit for a number of terrorist incidents inside Israel since 2005.

Her statistics on Palestinian casualties are misleading. Through careful
cross-checking of Palestinian sources, CAMERA has demonstrated that the groups
Baltzer relies upon for her figures play games with how they classify terrorists
and militants as civilians or non-combatants. For example, the pro-Palestinian
Israeli group B’Tselem categorizes known terrorists killed in Israeli air
strikes as non-combatants so long as they were not carrying out an attack at the
time of their demise. Another CAMERA study combed through the weekly reports of
the Gaza-based monitoring group Palestinian Committee for Human Rights (PCHR)
and calculated 58 percent of all Palestinian fatalities between April 2006 and
April 2008 were identified as militants, resistance activists or members of
Palestinian security forces by this partisan group. Israeli tallies indicate
that the overwhelming majority of Palestinian fatalities are militants and
terrorists.

Curiously Baltzer’s blog falls silent between April 29, 2005
and Jan 26, 2007, a time during which the main news focused on Israel’s decision
to withdraw from Gaza and the chaotic results within Gaza afterward, including
intensified internecine fighting between Hamas and Fatah.
In 2007, in the
midst of an extended period of relative calm between Israelis and Palestinians
on the West Bank, she exclaimed in her blog:

Injustice is unsustainable.
It cannot be normalized, because there will always be resistance. The third
intifada will come...If the third intifada does not succeed, there will be a
fourth. And then a fifth… As many as it takes, until justice is served. (April
29, 2007)
Although Baltzer’s organization IWPS proclaims in its mission
statement that it is "non-aligned and non-partisan and does not 'take sides' but
supports any individual, group or organization who resist the Military
Occupation of the West Bank in a nonviolent manner," she implicitly condones
violence by urging endless intifadas. Surely she knows that Palestinian and
Israeli blood would inevitably flow during the next and any subsequent
intifadas.

Like others who have preceded her as roving agitators against
the Zionist state, Baltzer feeds off the continuing conflict. Her agenda
promotes resentment and holds out to Palestinians the unrealistic hope of
reversing a century of Jewish growth and development of the land. This can only
push prospects for a peaceful coexistence further away. With continuing attempts
to forge a more cooperative and calm atmosphere in the West Bank, it is no
surprise that Baltzer and others who share her agenda increasingly align their
views and actions with the most determined opponents of compromise, like Hamas.

5 comments:

If Americans Knew is run by Alison Weir. Alison has ben
featured on Nazi websies with David Duke, and she is funded by the Saudis and
PLO. Her statistics are usually contrived. For example, she counts as civilian
casualties any Palestinian Arabs who were armed terrorists or suicide bombers.
She was a divorced mother of three who was looking for a sinecure until she met
some Arabs who finaced her. She is not a journalist. If you are thinking she is
a reliable source you are sadly mistaken. Read more about her at this
link:
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/2006/01/will_alison_wei.php If you
think she is a noble person, ask yourself wh she embraces terrorist movements
overseas. Don't be a useful idiot. Check her out also at www.StoptheISM.com and
DAFKA.org.

Go read the Hamas Charter, a group for which Anna
promotes an agenda along with Fatah then talk to me about hatred and paranoia.
You live 10,000 mles away in the US so don't ahve missiles falling on your head
nor Arabs trying to kill you. Anna Baltzer sadly is a Jewish quisling for
Muslim/Arab fascists. She has been caught lying by me on moe than one occasion.
I suggest you also google Anna Baltzer _ CAMERA.org for more info on this Jewish
Eve Braun for the Arabs.

If Americans Knew is a non-profit organization that focuses on the
Arab-Israeli conflict and United States foreign policy regarding the Middle
East, offering analysis of American media coverage of these issues. Its mission,
according to the group's website, is to provide "what every American needs to
know about Israel/Palestine."[1] The site is generally critical of U.S.
financial and military support of Israel.

In addition to the freelance
journalist and founder Alison Weir [2], board members include [2] Paul Findley,
a former United States Representative, and Andrew I. Killgore, a former
ambassador of the United States to Qatar [3].

I checked Anna Baltzer in Camera - the first pharagraph was so full of venom
that I did not want to read the rest - I can get more balanced information on
other sites.

Responding to the attack on Bary Gillis - you also live in
the US - 10050 miles from Gaza - so you also don't have missiles falling on your
head.

I am wasting my time here - it is better spent writing letters to
my representatives telling them about my outrage at the deaths of 13 Israelis
and 814
Palestinians
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94668364

Maria
Deszcz-Pan (I do not know how andizerig appeared as my login name)

Saturday, February 2, 2013

For those of you following my work exposing the International Solidarity Movement
you may have seen the brouhaha about my latest article about Anna Baltzer of the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation. If you scroll down to my past articles about
Anna here on my blog, you can learn more about her. To brief those not in the know,
I wrote an article where I said Anna lied about having a Fulbright and attending Birthright, tales she uses to pose as the Jew who wants to bring down Israel for Hamas.
Well, it turns out she did get a grant from Fulbright and may have even been at Birthright (still waiting for proof), but under a completeley different name, Anna Piller.

Needless to say, the ISM trolls on the Internet are crowing about the fact she did have these things in her background somehow disproves all the pro-terrorist activities
I've proven about the ISM over the last ten years and that she is a serial liar. The article in question was pulled by one panicky publisher who was afraid of a lawsuit over a minor error that the anti-Israel trolls tried to make into a major issue--and succeeded. Anna Baltzer herself never sent any letters, I guess leaving the threats up to the ISM cultists to do it for her. The rest of the articles in question were true to the T, though. Anna just finished telling an audience at Oxford yet another lie that Israel is the same as apartheid 1980's South Africa. She's going to Belgium on Monday to tell assorted atrocity lies about Israel to further spur anti-Semitism in Europe.

Anyway, I thought I'd write Anna Baltzer an OPEN LETTER here on my blog and those ISM trolls out there who are living on the Internet for her can, and I am sure will, show it to her. I hope the ISM trolls and my followers will disseminate this far and wide:

AN OPEN LETTER CHALLENGE TO ANNA BALTZER (sic)

Ms. Baltzer (or is it Piller? Nardi?):

It has come to my attention that even though the Fulbright websites and staff advised me there was no Anna Baltzer who obtained a Fulbright scholarship in 2003 as your Wikpedia entry said you did at the time I wrote my article about your going to Oxford (which I understand is now changed saying you are also known as Anna Piller), why do you permit all the public relations articles put out by the ISM for you to say "Anna Baltzer received a Fulbright Scholarship"? In fact, why do you even need to use a false name?

As for Birthright, at this writing I'm waiting to hear back to see if they hosted an Anna Piller in 2000, this query based on a similar confusion to that above. ISM activists frequently use false identities to do their work against Israel, even obtaining multiple passports to get back there after deportation. Is that why you have the false name Anna Baltzer?

Do you use the name Anna Baltzer because you have a criminal conviction on your record from 1997 under the name Anna Piller? And what was that conviction for, pray tell?

Finally, there's the issue of your grandparents who allegedly were Holocaust survivors.
In my article, I mention I could find no record of Baltzers who were listed as Holocaust survivors from the death camps. I found only one woman named Baltzer who did perish during the Shoah. I imagine she'd object to you using her name.
In my earlier articles and the ones about you at Oxford, I mentioned Hedy Epstein, the phony "Holocaust survivor" of the ISM who I learned was never in the death camps and spent the entire war in the safey of England as a child. Hedy, as an adult after the war belonged to pro-Stalinist groups that were anti-Zionist (Stalin was actually planning a new pogrom when he died) and that she even supported Pol Pot. The liars in the ISM tried parading her out at divestment events hoping audiences would think a victim of the Nazi death camps even was against the Jewish state. You know, the same idea behind an anti-Semite like yourself claiming she is attacking the Jewish people in the name of Arab irredentists, revanchist idealogues like Hamas so that non-Jews and (other suckers) will not see your program as promoting hatred for the Jews.

What are the names of your grandparents who are "Holocaust survivors" and what death camps did they survive? Surely you'd want this information made public to bolster your credentials. Do you have the tattooed numbers from their arms to facilitate an accurate search? I await a reply.

How much do you earn as the head of the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation?
My research tells me that ISM coordinators like you are paid $60,000 a year from the the likes of the PLO. With all your world travel, etc. I'd imagine you must be paid far more. Do you mind telling the world your income for this sinecure you have as the Jew
who works to deport other Jews from their homes and supports terrorist groups that calls for killing them? You are also involved with Medea Benjamin's Code Pink and Global Exchange, that wonderful group that sent $600,000 to the Iraqi resistance in aid
while US marines were dying and losing limbs during the Battle for Fallujah. I'm curious how much it costs to buy a pretty "Jewish" girl (are you really even Jewish?)
to serve as a mouthpiece for destroying the Jews in the Middle East first and stir anti-Semitism in colleges, meeting halls and most of all in Christian churches. Can you divulge this information? It migh shed light on your epiphany and statements you are promoting Jewish values by supporting and lying for Jew-killers like Hamas.

Finally, can you answer these three questions below, though I already know the answers:

Have you read the Hamas Charter and its calls to annihilate all the Jews in the world as well as Israel as a religious obligation to God and do you agree with it? In other words,
will you condemn Hamas as a terrorist group?

Does Israel have a right to exist as it is, the Jewish national homeland? (You apparenly refused to answer this earlier on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart which was an obvious "no". I suppose you couldn't risk your sinecure from the Arabs who pay you by saying that Israel has any right to exist.)

For what crime were you convicted in 1997 when you were about 18 years old? Was it serious? Was it for fraud? For what were you convicted back then? Is that why you began using aliases?

The only persons I know who use aliases are criminals and celebrities. Was it the former that became the reason "Anna Baltzer" was coined? Or the latter, so you could become famous as the Jew for another Jewish Holocaust? Curious minds want to know. I note this article from 2006 that says Anna Baltzer is your real name and Piller the alias. Why did you change it?