Sunday, February 19, 2012

By Mike James in Germany – 19 February 2012

Over the course of the last forty years, our lives have been torn
asunder and our hearts have been broken by what has happened to our once
sovereign nations.

We struggle to understand why the world is turning around Satan’s
counterfeit version of Israel. We feel ourselves remorselessly crushed
by the dead-weight of multiculturalism, political correctness and the
intrusive legislation and technologies of burgeoning police states. We
find ourselves indentured to a rapaciously parasitic banking system,
which destroys wealth, enterprise and hope by shackling our bodies and
our souls to Mammon, rendering us as little more than tax slaves and
consumer tit-feeders.

We know that all these things have come to pass not by accident, but
by design, for, if it were the former, happenstance would have smiled
more kindly on us and the evil we sense quite palpably would not bear
the all too obvious signature of invention.

We seek an explanation as to why such calamities have beset us,
degrading the proud societies in which we once lived, corrupting the
natural order of human relationships and perverting all governments,
which have surrendered any pretence that it is the patriotic interests
of the people and not the banking and corporate cartels they serve. In
so doing, we turn to the internet, for even seasoned journalists who
work for the print media or television networks believe not a single
word they themselves write or say.

Explanations of varying shades are to be found in abundance and for
this we must thank the many thousands of dedicated patriots who have
devoted the best part of their lives to making such information
available to all who seek the truth, and at no charge whatsoever.

Having exercised discernment in studying the vast wealth of
literature accessible with just a few clicks of a mouse, the reader who
is not frightened by his realisation that almost everything he was
taught as a youngster is a lie now finds himself at liberty to decide
whether or not he wishes to do something practical with his new-found
knowledge and sense of outrage. There is however something he should be
advised to bear in mind.

The internet is the saviour of no man, let alone those who regard
themselves as patriots. It is merely a tool that provides for rapid
access to valuable information and which additionally serves as a means
of communication. At its best, that is all it is. It is also a
double-edged sword that can be used against you. Primarily developed to
serve the needs of the scientific and military complex, the Net was made
available to the world by the self-same powers who currently use it to
spy on you and regulate every aspect of your life.

Without the Net, the pro-Zionist colour revolutions backed by the
CIA and US Sate Department in the nations of the former Soviet Union
would not have been possible. It was additionally deployed to initiate
and then control the outcomes of more violent revolutions in the Arab
world, including one which saw fanatically deluded militants and
globalist stooges in Libya foolishly work in concert with NATO to
destroy the factories, public utilities and transport infrastructure
built by themselves, their parents and their grandparents, effectively
guaranteeing lucrative reconstruction contracts for parasitic French and
British real estate gangsters.

Outside of China and Germany, the internet has remained largely
uncensored for a very good reason. Data mining companies, consumer
profilers, corporate lobbyists, political research groups, social
engineers and intelligence agencies have profited enormously from the
free flow of information that has allowed them to build a fairly exact
picture as to who you are, the friends that you have, what you consume,
your state of health, what you believe and, by means of predictive
programming, what you will do when the proverbial shit hits the global
CPU fan.

Not that it really matters. Without electrical power all modern
systems of surveillance, control and repression can be switched off at
the flick of a switch, so to speak, and those who are serious about
shutting down the life support systems that animate the European Union
and other global leviathans of an unlawful and totalitarian nature are
in training to do just exactly that. They use a modality of the internet
of which few people are aware and though they cooperate with one
another through code, each participant is blind to the identity of the
others.

Back up here on the “visible” internet, the sooner we realise that
there is not and never was a cohesive anti-Zionist and patriotic “truth”
movement (for the truth is in and of God and he requires no explanation
by means of organised human agencies), the sooner we shall thwart the
globalists in their building a nearly completed New Babylon.

The sooner we realise that unity is neither possible nor desirable,
and which indeed mitigates against the fierce spirit of individualism
that breathes life into the battle cries of all true warriors who know
that the monster which has enslaved humanity will be slain not by a
single mortal blow but by a plethora of strategically inflicted wounds,
the sooner we shall commit to an already functioning and fearsome
Leaderless Resistance predicated on necessarily secret and untold
individual acts of daring and courage.

The sooner we realise that laying the best laid plans makes mice of
men and that those who elevate themselves as spokesmen for a “movement”
rather than working as studious and humble facilitators of truthful
information are to be treated with sceptical circumspection, the sooner
we shall stop expending precious vigour in judging others and losing
ourselves in endless debates, caught in the World Wide Web of our own
vanities, our own despair, our own wantonly tragic inaction.

Journalists or, as in my case, former freelance journalists who
write voluntarily for the Net all too often forget that they are nothing
more than the information and inspiration they impart to others, must
accept editorial constraints commensurate with the web portal’s
house-style and should not seek to make of themselves a cult of
personality. Some of the best writing on the Net is either penned or
presented by those who have had absolutely no journalistic or
investigative training whatsoever.

I speak of the diligent and largely ignored Holger Haffke
(gnosticliberationfront.com) whose courageous and passionate dedication
to freeing his fellow citizens from the squalor and poverty of ignorance
has cost him his health, and of the inestimably brave Brother
Nathaniel, with whom I had the pleasure of collaborating during my
crisis year of 2008, and who, even down to his last few cents, phoned me
four times from New York to speak not only of the constant threats to
his life but to also reassure me that the harassment I myself was
enduring would, by the Will of God, be cut short.

I could speak of many others (thousands of them) who contacted me in
the years when my e-mail and home addresses were made known to all and
sundry, some of whom I came to care about deeply, not just as friends
out there in the ether, but as close fellow combatants, anxious sons and
daughters who came to me for advice.

Patriots who command an esteemed presence on the internet do a great
disservice to those who derive inspiration from them by arguing
unnecessarily among themselves, creating suspicions where none should
exist and allowing discord, petty bickering and back-biting to poison
the wellspring of good intentions and brave deeds.

We who are opposed to Zionism, the European Union, the New World
Order and the effeminate Jewification of Celtic-Saxon culture are, by
nature, quite unlike the international socialists, liberals and
soft-bellied conservatives who have sold our people into slavery. We
are, in the main, militant freeborn individualists, gnostic free
spirits, Christians without a church or denomination, pugnacious
scrappers and unashamed politically incorrect troublemakers who are
unafraid to offend the fragile sensibilities of those in authority. Let
us therefore not take affright when we offend each other.

Those who have artfully crafted the unnatural and anti-human
consensual mode of existence by which we live in a world informed by a
Luciferian and liberal Zeitgeist mediated by the decadent and corrupting
influence of Zionism in all of its manifestations fear nothing more
than the fully awakened and spiritually assured individual who, no
matter how humble or penniless he may be and without regard to his own
personal welfare and the status accorded to him by his slave masters on
the global plantation, seeks to tell the truth as he perceives it so
that his compatriots are enlightened as to the illusions under which
they travail and are forewarned of the fate that surely awaits them.

Before sewing discord in the hearts of those who yearn for freedom,
the slave masters invariably attempt to unite them in order to
infiltrate, subvert, co-opt and thereby control the forces of opposition
to their schemes. They know that they must discourage individuality and
a strong faith in the only leader to whom men should look for guidance,
liberation and, ultimately, salvation: God Almighty.

When Jesus Christ came into this world to relate a blindingly simple
message of freedom from material bondage and spiritual tyranny, the
religious elites and the secular Idumean-Jewish power network, horrified
at this potential challenge to their wealth and status, sent out spies
and tricksters who sought to find evidence sufficient to the task of
incriminating him for sedition or to discover ways in which he could be
accommodated to their own political advantage.

In their hearts the revolutionary zealots, the Pharisees, the
religious separatists, the Messianic “truth” activists, the Sadducees
and the Hellenist freethinkers and philosophers of the day all saw the
advantage of recruiting Jesus into their respective ranks or at least
having him endorse them as legitimate and worthy of men’s allegiance.
They were to be bitterly disappointed.

In their ignorance and in the lusts according to their own selfishly
legalistic obsessions, they murdered the messenger who spoke the Word
through which, resurrected forever in the hearts of those who had the
childlike faculties to understand, all men and women, for all time and
retrospectively backdated, were set free from the bondage of ignorance
and granted direct access, without any human mediator, to the unbounded
grace of the Creator of all things.

It is no coincidence that in America, Britain, Ireland, Australia,
Canada, New Zealand and in other enclaves of Celtic-Saxon culture, the
rate of social collapse and disintegration is directly proportional to
the loss of faith in Christ and the replacement of naturally intuited
moral correctness with the blasphemous depravity of political
correctness.

It may have escaped your notice, but let me remind you that our kind
is assaulted daily by the Serpent Race, those who say they are Jews,
but are not: those who came from the East and whose forefathers were
never inhabitants of a land that God forbade the original Jews to ever
enter again, the Ashkenazim, all puffed up, cunning, manipulative,
deceitful, skilled in the arts of financial trickery and political fraud
on a scale that defies the scope of any one of their many slick
Hollywood productions.

For too long now we have allowed them to debase all that was decent,
proper, virtuous and good about our way of life. Their financial
alchemists whispered into the ears of our kings and regents long ago,
sequestering for themselves the sole right to issue currency and charge
interest against loans conjured up out of thin air as if by kabbalistic
magic, which is really all it is, thus enslaving entire nations to an
anti-human money system that denies all of us the bounty of living in
joy, with each of us working only for those things necessary to
sustenance and the attainment of a future for our children while living
fully in the Present, enjoying the God-given gift of life to the very
full.

I am heartbroken by what they have done to my nation, England. For
the love of a woman, I left those shores twenty years ago, returning
only once, and yet I am enraged by the despoliation of the greatest race
of men, the fairest among the fair, the salt of the earth, the hardiest
of souls that walked and still walk in the loving Shadow of Greatness
and who, despite all of their endearing shortcomings and their
self-effacing denial of innate moral excellence, painted upon the canvas
of this earthly domain a portrait of their own creativity and
compassion for all of the races of humankind.

We, the Celtic-Saxon peoples of this world, were born as lion cubs,
brave and free, emotionally and temperamentally unsuited to servitude.
We owe it to our children and our great-grandchildren to fight, and
fight we shall.

This world was given over to us as a charge, as a keepsake; and for
this reason, even before the foundation of all things, God predestined
those who now speak English as of their indigenous and cultural
inheritance to give every thing on the face of the earth, every thing
below it and every thing above a name, and also to teach the other races
to do the same. If it were not so, then why is it that the Asians, the
Negroes, and the Jews cannot make themselves understood at an
international level unless they speak the language that was, even seen
within an “evolutionary” scheme of things, the fittest to survive by
means of the moral excellence of those who first spoke it?

Therefore, let there be no discord between you, for these are
perilous times. My people require that all avenues of communication are
open to them without fear or favour, and let no patriot who fancies
himself as a writer of repute to be emulated stand in the way on account
of his own ego or personal vanities, for, in the final reckoning of
things, all will be counted against him.

The people of my nation, England, yearn for freedom. They dream
that, one day, they may live as a people secure and prosperous within
their own God-given country, liberated from the impositions of parasitic
foreign hordes, strange religions, utopian European projects and the
psychotic vicissitudes of international financial alchemy that has
robbed them of their wealth and natural inheritance.

Let us not for one moment weaken in our resolve to ensure that they get it.

———-
Michael James, an English republican patriot, is a blacklisted former
freelance journalist resident in Zionist-occupied Germany since 1992
with additional long-haul stays in East Africa, Poland and Switzerland.
He advocates a Leaderless Resistance to destroy the Soviet European
Union and prays for a free and independent England, shorn of all
alliances with the EU, UK, NATO, the UN, WTO, IMF, Israel and any other
treacherous international cabal or entity.
———-

Alexander Wendt and Raymond Duvall"Sovereignty and the UFO"Thursday, January 19, 200612:00 p.m.

Mershon Center for International Security StudiesWendt&Duvall, Draft 1: p.1Alexander Wendt is the Ralph D. Mershon Professor of International Security Studies at the Mershon Center, and Raymond Duvall is Professor of Political Science and Associate Director of the Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Global Change/MacArthur Interdisciplinary Program on Global Change, Sustainability, and Justice at the University of Minnesota. They gave a talk entitled “Sovereignty and the UFO” at the Mershon Center, addressing the puzzle of why it is that modern states do not take Unidentified Flying Objects seriously.

Wendt and Duvall offer what they call an “epistemology of UFO ignorance” to explain why modern states systematically resist the notion that extra-terrestrial life forms might both exist and travel to earth. They emphasized their militant agnosticism about whether UFOs really are extra-terrestrial, saying that they are interested only in how and why the ignorance is maintained.

They said that the authoritative public sphere discourages taking UFOs seriously, and that this is ignorance masquerading as knowledge. There has actually been little scientific research on the subject, meaning that we do not know whether or not UFOs exist. Lack of evidence for UFOs’ existence does not mean that they do not exist, Wendt and Duvall argued, and skepticism regarding UFOs – that extra-terrestrials would be unable to reach earth, that UFOs would land on the White House lawn, that we would know if UFOs had been on earth – is not sufficient. Instead, the burden of proof ought to lie with disproving their existence.Wendt and Duvall explained why they would expect UFOs to be taken seriously. First, if UFOs were found to prove the existence of extra-terrestrial life, this would be the most important event in world history. Second, aliens pervade popular culture, making it clear that people are interested in the phenomenon of UFOs. Third, states have historically been very willing to label things security threats, because the presence of more security threats increases states’ power in order to deal with them. Last, natural scientific curiosity would seem to make research about UFOs interesting and desirable. Despite all of this, very little is known about UFOs, and the modern state shows no signs of encouraging otherwise.

Wendt and Duvall argued that the authoritative epistemology of UFO ignorance is necessary to maintain modern governance, because intelligent extra terrestrial life that can make itself known on earth is a threat to human-centered science and rule. They said that UFOs constitute a metaphysical threat to human power, making ignoring them the only alternative acceptable to modern states. They divided their argument into three parts.

First, they situated modern rule as “governmentality.” Governmentality is what Foucault describes as non-coercive rule, or power that functions not by violence or physical oppression but through control of knowledge. Both science and the state rest upon an anthropocentric metaphysics, whereby human conduct is all that matters. A regime of governmentality may also have a sovereign or coercive face, however, which deals with the physical threats that arise (but rarely).Second, they discussed how that sovereign face functions. They said that there are sometimes physical threats to governmentality, and that, in these exceptional circumstances, the state must resort to coercive behavior.

Third, they said that the UFO poses not just a physical threat, to which a modern state could respond with its sovereign behavior, but also a metaphysical threat. Even if a UFO and its occupants had benign intentions, its unique otherness (in being non-human) would require a world government, united against the other, and this new universal sovereignty would replace the modern state as we know it.Wendt and Duvall repeated that phenomena requiring exceptions to normal governmentality fall into two categories: physical (e.g. conquest) and existential or ontological threats (e.g. the existence of a non-human world that would extinguish the viability of individual nationally sovereign states). They said that the state cannot decide how to deal with UFOs as an exception, because even acknowledging their possible existence would call into question the state’s role as the sole securitizer, and this leaves only one option: the existence of UFOs must be denied.

They also noted that the study of UFOs, even if it were not actively discouraged politically, may be a difficult task. The UFO poses what they called a “threat of unknowability” to science, on several grounds. First, UFOs are random and seemingly unsystematic. Second, UFOs appear to violate the laws of physics, making them “impossible” per the laws of science that would be used to study them. Third, the UFO raises the possibility of a non-human subjectivity, making an understanding of UFOs potentially unassayable.

Wendt and Duvall said that modern states’ ignorance of UFOs need not be conscious, as conspiracy theories would suggest. States might unconsciously repress UFOs as taboo, so as not to reveal their existential insecurities. Wendt and Duvall identified four mechanisms by which states, whether consciously or unconsciously, authoritatively repress UFOs. --First, epistemic authorities may simply announce that we know UFOs not to exist. --Second, they may announce that UFOs do not and cannot constitute a security threat (on the grounds mentioned earlier, e.g. UFOs would not be able to reach earth, etc). These claims might be supported by secrecy, such as the non-reporting of cases or redactions from official reports.--Third, they may denounce UFO research as inherently pseudo-science. They may do this by systematically denying federal funding to any grant proposal about such research, or by otherwise exerting pressure on scientists to self-censor to avoid ridicule. --Last, epistemic authorities may practice pseudo-science, themselves. For example, the U.S. Air Force commissioned a report on UFOs in the late 1960s, and the panel undertaking the research was stacked with skeptics whose bias rendered their findings unscientific. Even while suffering from serious methodological flaws that biased findings against the existence of UFOs, the study had a 30% failure rate at explaining them. This failure rate hardly warranted the study’s summary, which declared that UFOs do not exist.

Ultimately, Wendt and Duvall characterized UFOs as a political problem first, rather than a scientific or sociological one. In order to address UFOs, the taboos against such research must be lifted. They said that once there is real scientific research underway, it should be possible for science and the state to diverge on the question of UFOs’ existence.

Subscribe To

Followers

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, religious tolerance, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.