Samsung Ultra Smart F700 Comments

i believe samsung didn't try to copy the iphone or LG prada phone. however it's certainly that samsung lose the game be more creative than apple or LG prada. also samsung's F700 looks worse than apple and LG.

Fm>Infrared>EDGE>Wifi are old age my dear....future is HSDPA/WiMAX. Grow up. And this baby is not just 1.8mbps or 3.6mbps...this is freaking 7.2mbps. Not everyone would have the pleasure to enjoy that speed though.

In my opinion I think GSM Arena the website is the best thing since sliced bread and milk chocolate. Without GSM Arena non of us would be able to research our phones prior to actually buying. Thanks for your excellent work GSM Arena - Chris in Sweden.

I cant believe in this day and age that people would waste their time commenting on who copied who. What about using this website for something constructive. The phone looks great, it should get wifi, but we will only know when the thing actually gets released. I hope its allot sturdier than their previous phones. Samsungs are generally quite brittle

Samsung cells r total craps.These cells r Back To Old Age Types.During todays time samsungs have no wi-fi.????.no iR. no EDGE?No fm?????????even nokia cells which were released 2 years earlier r better than this piece of crap by samsung.samsungs just snobbish.look how late they introduced bluetooth in their cells.

Its not a copy. You should have enough intelligence to think that samsung did not develop it in 2 weeks. They must be working on it for a long time. Also it has much better features compared to iphone and is also smaller in size. Its great

No quadband GSM, no business phone. Just another flashy and shiny toy. Look Samsung and other cell producers, what business people need is a phone that can be used in anyplace in this planet, has reliable battery life and good organizer. Camera is not a major issue, if you may not say it is useless.