What I really mean is that following the one-click principle, the Forum link could have simply gone into the Murga Forum (or opened a new window to the Forum).

A number of requests in the wish list concerns the TinyMCE editor. IMHO, there are simpler and faster editors around, like widgEditor. This would require hard-coding in the appropriate page/s. If this is very difficult to do, perhaps just remove the TinyMCE module - this will speed up the editing interface._________________Puppy user since Oct 2004. Want FreeOffice? Get the sfs (English only).

I like mediawiki. There are drupal modules that could make the drupal wiki more wiki like. There is also a mediawiki extension called authdrupal which could be used to achieve single sign-on with an inhouse mediawiki installation. Both drupal and mediawiki support openid as well.

Whilst I dislike tinymce I think that widgeditor may be a little too simplistic. I'm certainly not sure how the image insertion would integrate with drupal. My beef with tinymce is speed and also the way that it encourages people to add a lot of unnecessary presentational instructions when they would be better focusing on clear writting instead.

The whole bottom line of the wiki page (which includes licensing). Serves very little purpose and if you know how to get rid of it, please do or at least modify. the licensing can be moved to a licensing wiki page. It is not worth a line of screen space. Nor is the repetition of the top title bar in my opinion..

I am loath to modify any part of the site until I have practiced with a test Drupal site I have set up. I would also recommend DarelJohn is given more access so his 'plain English' ideas can be incorporated.

I'm resisting the urge to revive the old wiki (which I have abandoned editing) to give the new site a fair chance of adoption.
http://pupweb.org/wikka/

Our previous CMS website was abandoned by the main developer (Puppian) because setting it up is easy (relatively) what makes it worthwhile is adding content consistently.

The new site is far more attractive, with more content and integration and deserves more support. _________________Puppy WIKI

I am loath to modify any part of the site until I have practiced with a test Drupal site I have set up. I would also recommend DarelJohn is given more access so his 'plain English' ideas can be incorporated.

Indeed, darrelljon has the appropriate access to puppylinux.org, but he needs a test Drupal setup for practice. (Am planning to create a practice site at pupweb.org over the weekend. But if you have one already, darrelljon can use an FTP account to access your Drupal folder. BTW, it should be Drupal 5.xx.)

This page has gone missing or been deleted or incorporated into other pages? Not sure who did this. No 'revision' option comes up so I do not know what was there previously. I started to play with settings to find it and have decided to stop before I mess up completely . . .

btw
Yesterday I removed the category list from the side of the wiki pages (except the front one), is it better with more space?_________________Will
contribute: community website, screenshots, puplets, wiki, rss

I run Puppy 4.1.2 Retro on a Pentium 200 Mhz 32MB Ram mini laptop daily and it runs very well and fast enough for most things. The mini laptop is from circa 1998, so I'd have to agree that 4.0 isn't just for new hardware.

I've run it on 133 Mhz & 32MB Ram with similar performance. It's circa 1996.

I have a lot of old spec machines and run some version or another of Puppy 4.1.2 Retro on all of them.

With Linux I no longer feel the need to buy a new computer every other year. It's been about 5 years since I bought new and I doubt I will ever buy new again.

I personally think Puppy is the best success story out of all the Linux Distros. I have something like 200 Distros on CD's and yet I have mainly always used Puppy because it just works on everything.

Just wanted to say something to that effect and not meaning to hijack the thread.

Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

Seems to be down?

HostGator took us down AGAIN for high CPU usage! What th'!! They claimed it was because of 50 simultaneous accesses to the main page! I think we need to be thinking about another host. That's just rubbish, to kill the site without warning like that; not once but twice!

Anyway, I made some changes to caching, etc and that seemed to satisfy them for the moment so it should be back now. _________________Actions speak louder than words ... and they usually work when words don't!
SIP:whodo@proxy01.sipphone.com; whodo@realsip.com

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot vote in polls in this forumYou cannot attach files in this forumYou can download files in this forum