This is a request to add the following items to the RDF WG telecon
Agenda tomorrow:
1. Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Allow a graph name to
be both (IRI, graph), and (blank node, graph).
2. Preference-poll: Do blank node identifiers, when used as graph names,
denote graphs?
3. Preference-poll: Do IRIs, when used as graph names, denote graphs?
Here are the corresponding proposals:
PROPOSAL: Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Specifically,
allow associating (IRI, graph) and (blank node, graph) when naming graphs.
PREFERENCE POLL: Blank nodes, when used as graph names, denote the graph
that they are paired with.
PREFERENCE POLL: IRIs, when used as graph names, denote the graph that
they are paired with.
-- manu
--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/