Watch

Watch

That’s up from the more than 700 specific complaints that the commissioner’s office publicly reported in March to clear the air after an online campaign attracted more than 30,000 expressions of concern by Canadians.

But the elections commissioner, in his latest court offering, declined to respond to a number of other disclosure requests by advocacy group the Council of Canadians.

“Like all law enforcement agencies, the Office of the Commissioner treats complaints and the office’s ongoing investigations in confidence and discloses neither the information collected nor the source of the information, except as necessary for law enforcement purposes,” wrote John Laskin, representing the commissioner’s office.

The letter goes on to “emphasize” that the total number of complaints and ridings “does not provide any indication of whether complaints are … substantiated, or whether complainants reported their voting behaviour to have been affected.”

Allegations of fraudulent and misleading phone calls designed to suppress the vote of targeted constituents during the May 2, 2011, election are currently being investigated by the commissioner’s office.

Marc Mayrand, the chief electoral officer, said this spring that the investigation “touches on the fundamentals of our democracy, how we elect our representatives. I can’t see anything more serious than that in our democratic institutions.”

The investigation has centred on Guelph, Ont., where a number of residents say they received automated phone calls from someone claiming to be from Elections Canada and directing them to a wrong or non-existent polling station.

While the misleading phone calls appeared to target non-Conservative voters, the Conservative Party insists it had no involvement in any such scheme and says it is assisting the investigation.

The Council of Canadians, a nationalist, left-leaning advocacy organization, is leading a parallel court battle to contest the election results in seven closely fought ridings, arguing that misleading calls to voters may have skewed the outcome.

The group wanted specific information from Elections Canada on the location and nature of robo-call complaints, and how many separate investigations are under way, in order to bolster its case.

New Elections Commissioner Yves Côté submitted a lengthy certificate to the Federal Court dated Aug. 17, declining to release much of the requested information.

Mr. Côté cited four main reasons for his non-disclosure:

Protecting the integrity of an ongoing investigation.

Maintaining public confidence in the fairness of the electoral process and enforcement of the elections rules.

Protecting the presumption of innocence.

Ensuring the commissioner remains impartial and non-partisan, and is perceived as such by the public.

“It’s important to know [the number of complaints] has increased,” Maude Barlow, chairwoman of the Council of Canadians, said in an interview. “That, I think, makes our case stronger and the concern of Canadians stronger.”

But Ms. Barlow wasn’t buying Elections Canada’s reasons for not disclosing more, saying the information should be public.

“We would like to know what ridings, we would like to know the actual nature of the complaints. We feel that people have a right to the kinds of details that simply are not there.”

Topics

Next story

| Learn More

Discover content from The Globe and Mail that you might otherwise not have come across. Here we’ll provide you with fresh suggestions where we will continue to make even better ones as we get to know you better.

You can let us know if a suggestion is not to your liking by hitting the ‘’ close button to the right of the headline.