Your point is valid but also strange. See, I have said that, i'd be miserable if i ever lost her friendship. That doesn't mean my mind doesn't go to sexual things, but they are far from the priority. I could go my whole life without anything sexual happening between me and her and be happy.

Well.. 99% of the time i would agree with this, but sometimes i play different online games with girls i know in my team.. Some of them arent that hot and i still want to be friends with them because i enjoy playing with them

But in the social sense it does. Many words we use today had a completely different meaning before.
Asexuality may not be entirely new, but it is still lesser known and as time goes on people will understand it better.

When I was younger and people would call someone a "hoe" all I could think of was gardening and assumed they were a gardener. As time progressed I learned the meaning and accepted it.

Yeah, I understand it's one of those "for lack of a better term" Kind of titles, but when you think about it, it's just wrong. I mean there's terms specifically for people who would indiscriminately have sex with a man, then a rooster, but not for people who feel no desire for sex.

The same as anyone else.
To me, thinking you NEED sex is pathetic.
I am also anti-sexual and am personally disgusted by sex but I understand why people want it.
Also I view it as masturbation with a foreign object.

Not in present day times.
The desire was important back in the day when there were oh so little people. But today we have billions, to feel the need to create more is only necessary for a few million of us to continue to thrive as a species.
That same argument has been used against gay sex as well.
But for each person they only need to pump out 1 child and some pump out 2 or more so it evens out.

Being asexual doesn't mean you WON'T procreate, it just means you don't feel the need to have sex for pleasure. I would probably have sex if I actually felt an attraction to someone and wanted a child. But that is it.