US Military Should Deepen Its Use of Deception, Pacific Air Forces General Says

In this May 16, 2019, photo, Gen. Charles Q. Brown, Jr., commander of the U.S. Pacific Air Force talks to a select group of journalists during the course of his visit to the Philippines in suburban Pasay city south of Manila, Philippines.

The U.S. military should rely more on deception and similar tactics instead of simply trying to counter Chinese military developments solely with expensive weapons, a top U.S. Air Force general said Tuesday.

“It’s something we’ve done in the past,” Gen. Charles Q. Brown, commander of Pacific Air Forces, said at a Defense Writers Group breakfast in Washington. “What I really believe [is] it’s something we, as a department, probably need to start paying more attention to.”

The general becomes the latest Defense Department official to call for changing up the playbook for great power competition against China and Russia, as called for in the National Defense Strategy.

“We have to look at other ways of how we do things from the capabilities standpoint,” Brown said. “I really believe that [China] will not actually go to war unless they feel confident they can actually win.”

Subscribe

Receive daily email updates:

Subscribe to the Defense One daily.

Be the first to receive updates.

Brown suggested using deception and decoys to keep China guessing and injecting doubt in its ability to win.

“[T]he first thing we do is we start going to whatever platform [or] weapon system we’re going to buy versus what is a different way to look at this?’ Brown said. “This is maybe another cultural-type shift. We’ve done some of these things in the past, in World War II, for example. It’s not something that we think about as much anymore.

“We’re more of a gadget [culture],” he said. “The other aspect of that is really thinking differently about how we do these things. Because as soon as you start talking to somebody, sometimes you get a sense, OK, what platform am I going to buy.”

Electronic warfare is another way to confuse an adversary.

“Those kinds of things that may not take as much money, but may have the same effect,” Brown said.

Earlier this year, then-Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson lamented the U.S. ability to keep up with China and Russia in information wars.

“Information operations is an example to undermine regimes,” Wilson told Military.com. “Russia and China are better at that than we are because we just don’t think that way.”

In October, Air Mobility Command commander Gen. Maryanne Miller, told Military.com that her command was planning to shake up its cargo plane destinations to throw off China and Russia. Brown is working on “dynamic force employment” — essentially, making military deployments less predictable.

Brown, the top U.S. Air Force general in the Pacific, said his region could benefit from funding specifically to counter China — similar to the European Deterrence Initiative projects created in Europe after Russia invaded Crimea.

“It [funding] would actually allow us to things like improve different areas … be able to preposition equipment, maybe increase some of our exercises,” Brown said.

Dedicated funding to counter China would support readiness and “some other investments” being considered by Adm. Philip Davidson, head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Brown said. That includes “our posture in the region at different locations,” exercises and partner nation engagements.

Related podcast:

Marcus Weisgerber is the global business editor for Defense One, where he writes about the intersection of business and national security. He has been covering defense and national security issues for more than a decade, previously as Pentagon correspondent for Defense News and chief editor of ...
Full bio

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or
otherwise objectionable. Although Defenseone.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and
has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems
to be in violation of this rule.