Please follow <URL:http://www.debian.org/MailingLists#codeofconduct>
and avoid sending individual copies of messages also sent to the
lists, since I haven't asked for that.
Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:27:29PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Please change this to a package name that is less generic, and
> > conforms with other OCaml library packages. 'libres-ocaml' would
> > be better.
>
> This is the source package name, as in all ITPs, not the binary
> package name. No OCaml package has a source name like libFOO-ocaml,
> they all have *binaries* called libFOO-ocaml-dev.
Regardless, 'res' is an overly general name. The package should be
more specific to the fact that it's an OCaml library. The time to
choose an appropriate name is now rather than later.
--
\ “If sharing a thing in no way diminishes it, it is not |
`\ rightly owned if it is not shared.” —Saint Augustine |
_o__) |
Ben Finney