Religion and the Regime: Cooperation and Conflict in Contemporary Russia and China

What is the nature of religion and state relations in authoritarian regimes? How do religious and regime actors negotiate the terms of their relationship;what do the two sides want from one another; and how cooperative or conflictual are their interactions? To address these questions, the author compares religion-regime relations in contemporary Russia and China—two autocracies with long histories of religious repression, diverse religious profiles, and distinct relations between religion and the state. The article introduces a new theoretical framework anchored in interests and subnational authoritarian politics to explain how religious and political authorities negotiate their relationship and the constraints and opportunities that shape their interaction. Although there are many reasons to expect different types of religion-regime relations across Russia and China, the data demonstrate that subnational governments and diverse religious actors often forge innovative partnerships to govern more efficiently, gain access to resources, and safeguard their survival.

AshiwaYoshiko, and WankDavid L.. 2009. Making Religion, Making the State: The Politics of Religion in Modern China. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

BorchertThomas. 2005. “Of Temples and Tourists: The Effects of the Tourist Political Economy on a Minority Buddhist Community in Southwest China.” In YangFenggang and TamneyJoseph B., eds., State, Market, and Religions in Chinese Societies. Boston, Mass.: Brill.

FoxJonathan. 2008. A World Survey of Religion and the State. Cambridge Studies in Social Theory, Religion, and Politics. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

FoxJonathan. 2015. Political Secularism, Religion, and the State: A Time Series Analysis of Worldwide Data. Cambridge Studies in Social Theory, Religion, and Politics. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

FoxJonathan. 2016. The Unfree Exercise of Religion: A World Survey of Discrimination against Religious Minorities. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

GrimBrian J., and FinkeRoger. 2011. The Price of Freedom Denied: Religious Persecution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge Studies in Social Theory, Religion, and Politics. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

JohnstonHank, and FigaJozef. 1988. “The Church and Political Opposition: Comparative Perspectives on Mobilization against Authoritarian Regimes.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion27, no. 1: 32–47. doi: 10.2307/1387400.

LieberthalKenneth G.1992. “Introduction: The ‘Fragmented Authoritarianism’ Model and its Limitations.” In LieberthalKenneth G. and LamptonDavid M., eds., Bureaucracy, Politics and Decision Making in Post-Mao China. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.

LinzJuan J.2004. “The Religious Use of Politics and/or the Political Use of Religion: Ersatz Ideology versus Ersatz Religion.” In MaierHans, ed., BruhnJodi, trans., Totalitarianism and Political Religions Volume 1: Concepts for the Comparison of Dictatorships. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

TrejoGuillermo. 2014. Popular Movements in Autocracies: Religion, Repression, and Indigenous Collective Action in Mexico. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

TsaiLily L.2007. Accountability without Democracy: Solidarity Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

ValaCarsten T.2009. “Pathways to the Pulpit: Leadership Training in ‘Patriotic’ and Unregistered Chinese Protestant Churches.” In AshiwaYoshiko and WankDavid L., eds., Making Religion, Making the State: The Politics of Religion in Modern China. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.