Not really considering pricing isn't up and the parts will be tested shortly

I know...what I'm saying is...you've brought no new information to market that hasn't been on their site for months. Therefore, a little late for the announcement no? Unless we are to expect results very very very soon? haha

My 335is had 42k miles on it and the DCT was as strong as day one. Had procede on it at 200 miles and the car was FBO w/ 50/50 E85/93 for the past year....

Where are you getting your facts from BQ? Also is the lease statement a jab at me? lol

By no means was I jabbing at you or anyone . Majority of people with leased cars, regardless of what car you have, dont give a toots azz about what happens to the car (as long as they can return it with no penalty) cause they are not keeping it.

You werent making enough power with that SlowCede for it to pose a threat to the DCT. I mean, I even pulled on your with my previous RENNtech tuning on 441, and completely distroyed you with PTF's tuning at PBIR. All the FBO you had didnt do much
Did you forget about that ? hehehe

Agree, but to what extent of the torque ? I would bet the flash only will produce more torque than the stack tuning before slippage.

They should be able to hold the same amount of torque. The limit is in the DCT TCU and its interaction with the DME (sharing of calculated torque values). There will be limits to how much torque can be reported by the flash. Truth be told, the same limits of calculated torque exist for a backend flashed piggyback and a flash tune. Why? Because you can modify the backend flash to report the same load as a true flash only tune.

Someone should give that FL335 guy a heads up to not send SSP a single penny for their DCT clutches. And if you're using a backend flash, you've basically rendered the piggyback a boost and meth controller??? Why not run the entire tune through flash, and (safely) run the meth system independently.