The manifestations more missives, since a long time ago, have flogged different countries in the East of Europe. Begging for Russia, which protests happened last 26 of March in different cities, from Moscow until Vladivostok in the pacific extreme, during a day against the corruption summoned by the leading opponent and candidate for the presidency, Alexei Navalny.

The protest in Moscow brought together near of 20.000 demonstrators and they are produce in the final straight line of the mandate of the president Putin. These thousands of persons, to shout of “impachment” asked for the resignation of the Prime Minister, Dmitry Medvedev – the one who is accused of corruption – as this way also to the political system imposed by the president Vladimir Putin.

Navalny summoned the protest in all the country after the publication different reports that affirm that Medvedev is an owner of mansions, yachts and vineyards, controlling a fortune very removed of what his official salary would allow him (Medvedev has been a government employee last 20 years).

The Kremlin, in this situation of agitation, manifested on Friday that the protests was no legal and, in addition, his summons supposed an illegal provocation. This way, it took to the arrest of more than 1000 protesters, even the proper Navalny. This one was condemned, court and accused for summoning a “manifestation without permission” and for “disobey the authority“. The authorities of the capital had proposed to the organizers alternative places to carry out the manifestation, removed from the center and therefore of the world visibility, but these refused.

After these events, the West rushed to issuing critiques towards the Russian authorities for the detentions realized to the demonstrators. The Department of State of the USA expressed that “to stop pacific demonstrators is an offense to the democratic values”. In the same line, the EU, across a release published in the web site of the European Service of Exteriors, called the Russian authorities “to be abiding by the international commitments assumed before the Council of Europe and the OSCE and to respect the rights (of freedom of meeting, meetings and manifestations) and to liberate without delay the participants of the pacific manifestations who were detained”.

For his part, the Department of Exteriors of Russia qualified of “Double standard” the reaction that took place in the Western over of detentions of the promoters of the illegal protests in Moscow, remembering “that the reactions were not similar to similar actions of the authorities of Germany, Netherlands and Austria, where there was prohibited the celebration of certain acts “.

In contrast with the past, when the manifestations saw limited to Moscow and Saint Petersburg, the Sundays marches included in addition dozens of cities and villages in other regions. And in a new phenomenon, which has surprised very much the different political analysts, it is the considerable participation of university students and of preparatory (access to the university) as well as of a wide geographical coverage, similar to the protests that took place in 2011-2012.

The protests, therefore, have shaken the stagnation of the political scene in Russia and have invigorated to the opposition after years of incessant but disguised repression of the government, showing the will of the Russian village to change the draconian laws that penalize with prison the participation repeated in not authorized protests. The Russian village comes demonstrating a great spirit of sacrifice, accepting limitations and punishment in altars to the greatness of the Mother Russia that joins all, which would be unimaginable in west (let’s remember that the average salary is 437 monthly $ whereas 110 individuals have in his hands 35 % of the total of financial assets possessed by Russia. But everything has a limit.

In second place, the manifestations in Kyrgyzstan that started the last 26 of February after the detention of Tekebayev, accused of corruption and fraud. Tekebayev leads the party Ata and is considerated the major critics of the president Almazbek Atambayev.

After weeks of lethargy, the protests returned to intensify last March 25 because the same reason than that the previous ones: the detention of the politician Sadyr Zhaparov, which the local means see as a possible candidate for the presidency. This Tekebayev’s detention in the airport looks like “the arrest of a journalist“, said to the press the ex-chairwoman Roza Otunbayeva.

His capture caused the mobilization of thousands of persons in the headquarters of the safety services in the capital of the mountainous central country of Asia, asking for the liberation of the politic. This protest concluded with the detention of dozens of demonstrators and with utilization of bewildering grenades for the police of Kyrgyzstan to finish with the concentration.

Tekebaev turned into an important critic last summer, after the constitutional amendments proposed – recounted in a referendum in December – of that the opponents are afraid are designed to support him already his allies in the power indefinitely.

Detention of Tekebayev a few months before the presidential elections (in November) can provoke a political stagnation in the country of Central Asia, where the demonstrators already expelled the presidents of the power in 2005 and 2010.

And, finally, the manifestations in Byelorussia remove producing from the beginning of March in the streets of Minsk, Brest and Gomel. The peculiar president Aleksándr Lukashenko qualified as the “last dictator of Europe” has run up with a situation that was not lived from 7 years.

Most part of the protest took place during this month in the small republic ex-Soviet and they have been produced in a spontaneous way and almost daily. The cause that provoked this wave of indignation in the country owes to the economic crisis and the called “law of parasite” –which consisted of the fact that any person who has worked less than 183 days a year will have to pay to the State 210 euros-, beside asking for the exit of the power of Lukashenko, which goes 27 years in the charge.

More than one hundred of persons were detained in the last manifestation realized last Saturday in Minsk due to the fact that they took part in a manifestation summoned by the opposition that was not authorized by the Town hall of the Belorussian capital.

The opponents celebrated the Day of the Freedom in recollection of the Popular Republic of Byelorussia, whereas the police were warning the political meeting the demonstrators were not authorized and called to be dissolved. Many defied the prohibition of the authorities and several hundred managed to articulate a march in the downtown, which ran up with the police, which stopped approximately 60 persons, as reports the Belorussian agency of news BelaPan, between them the presidential candidate Vladimir Nekliayev.

This is not the first occasion that Byelorussia sees shaken by social protests, since from the disintegration of the USSR, they come developing in the country movements of protest, which coincide practically with the presidential selections, asking for the exit of the power of the strong Belorussian man. But finally they end up by being suppressed or going out.

But the situation that is given is different, since the opposition thinks that “the Government of Minsk lacks the economic necessary resources with which it has lulled in the past the periodic outbreaks of popular indignation”.

This situation has been produce in a moment of decline of the relations between Byelorussia and Russia, due to the debt of gas supply and oil accumulated by Minsk, the Russian pressure to establish an air base in Belorussian territory, to what it was opposed till now, and to the hardening of the regime of visas for the citizens with I destine to several countries as the United States, Brazil and the EU, with that the Kremlin supports a geopolitical pulse.

Therefore, these manifestations that are lived in a few days, produced almost simultaneously, are the most massive of the year in those who are protested by the corruption, economic crisis and against the government, which in three cases tries to mitigate it across the force.

Until a few years ago, the high prices of the raw materials provided by these countries have allowed to support an important regime customer, buying massively wills for “a plate of lentils”. Nowadays the opening of new markets they have reduced this source of income returning to million persons to another side of the line of the worthy life (even in levels of the East), with which the quiet indignation of the citizens begins to show. If the situation does not change drastically we will see in the short and medium term more expressions of this feeling of collective frustration, of unforeseeable consequences, the, when it is so that to lose always it is more that to win with a change.