Agenda 21 wants to, among other things,
bring the American lands back to rewilding.

The non-governmental organization (NGO) The Wildlands Project (WP)
is a focusing of the American landscape in preservation for “future
generations to inherit a continent rich in wildlife, with plenty of room for
all species to roam.”

This does not necessarily mean that there will be room for humans as we are
seeing massive areas of land being placed under restrictions called
“conservation easements”, “scenic byways”, “protected areas”, “biosphere
reserves”, “wildlife refuges”, etc.

The names are varied and plentiful, but the
result is always the same: More government control; less human freedom.

The WP claims we are,

“experiencing the Sixth Great Extinction”
because of “human population growth, climate change, resource
extraction, new recreational technologies, habitat fragmentation”.

Since humanity is not a,

“highly interactive species” (meaning
species whose presence maintains the balance of other plant and animal
species with the habitat they share) “we are running out of room to
share with nature”.

The science-based agenda of WP has developed the
solution of dividing up North America into,

“four Continental Wildways [of] large
protected corridors of land running coast to coast... throughout Canada,
the US and Mexico.”

The
Boreal Wildway running west-east
from Alaska to the Canadian Maritimes across the forest roof of
North America

The wildways are,

“constructed by protecting core areas
connected to one another by corridors or linkages. They are essentially
mosaics of connected public and private lands that provide habitat and
safe passageways for wildlife to travel freely from place to place.”

Under the World Trade Organization (WTO) the UN has seen major advances in
the developing countries (i.e. Africa, India, Southeast Asia) where they
have,

“embraced the reforms of the WTO regime”
where “global import tariffs” have been used as protective measures
since 1995.

National subsidies have turned “agricultural
commodities” over to the global Elite International cooperation
and recognition of the UN’s superiority in the implementation of their
schemes.

Through the World Bank (WB) and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the manipulation of the
Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) uses reinvested funds that
are dumped into UN approved public service programs, healthcare and
education.

According to research from the International Institute for Applied
Systems Analysis (IIASA)
the issues caused by man-made climate change and its impact on the
environment cannot be resolved by a single country or member of academia,
but through the IIASA and the UN the securitization of energy on a national
level can be reworked to reflect Agenda 21 Sustainable Development.

Refocus town planning and infrastructure
on implementation of Agenda 21

Appear to be grassroots operations

Promote the Peak Oil mythology as an
energy scare-tactic

Support SmarthGrowth which is code for
Agenda 21

Aspire to control framing, disburse
ability to farm, and pressure governmental policies on farming that
reflect Agenda 21

Use the hoax of man-made climate change
as the purpose for imposing policy control by building cities that
are designed to reduce carbon emissions

Securitize local food stores,
businesses, healthcare and fuel

Ensure SmarthGrowth controls all
citizens ability to acquire any needs for human survival

Create internal advocacies that band
together to purvey Transition Town propaganda to elected officials
and local governments

The European Union has
adopted regulations that ban the
construction of single-family homes beginning in 2020.

These new dwellings, called passive houses will
be “zero-energy buildings”.
To control urban communities in so far as
“tangible spatial” development and the literal process of construction,
Germany is creating policies that facilitate “compact” housing that is more
“energy efficient”.

During the recent UN Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio+20,
governments and private sector
corporations have pledged to fund the UN’s endeavors toward
global governance with a generous $513 billion for Agenda 21 projects that
will restrict the movements of humans, perverse biodiversity and assist the
UN in attaining their Millennium Development Goals.

Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State supports the incorporation of
the Agenda 21 movement.

She remarked that,

“sustainability won’t happen without
business investment. Governments alone cannot solve all the problems we
face, from climate change to persistent poverty to chronic energy
shortages. That’s why we are so strongly in favor of partnerships.”

As far as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is
concerned, the money from corporations and governments cannot come at a
better time.

Ki-moon claims that “words must translate into
action” with regard to moving the environmental governance agenda forward.

Ki-moon says that since the first UNCSD, the incremental slide toward total
global governance has spawned UN conventions on climate change, biodiversity
and desertification, as well as the Agenda 21 blueprint for sustainable
development, yet,

“progress has been too slow - we have not
gone far enough down the road. We are now in sight of a historic
agreement - the world is waiting to see if words will translate into
action, as we know they must.”

The UNEO will prop up the Sustainable
Development division of the UN. The same agency that disseminates Agenda 21
policies to governments will be centralized into a global agency with
powerful international backing.

Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary General devised the global sustainability
panel that includes more than 50 supporters of the creation of UNEO.

“One option is the possible transformation
of UNEP into a specialized agency of the United Nations.

A strengthened UNEP could enhance coherence
between relevant multilateral environmental agreements, and better
integrate its work with the activities of development institutions,
especially the United Nations Development Program,” states one
recommendation.

They will force ecological taxes to steer large amounts of money into funds
designed to redesign humanity, civilization and the planet - and fit them
all into their mold. A carbon cap-and-trade tax system for industrial
countries could yield $250 billion per year.

Through consolidation of power within the UN, the Agenda 21 scheme is being
implemented locally; and finding success as fake grassroots efforts. The
global Elite have perfected the art of convincing the general public that
sustainability is a good idea.

By employing them to pressure their local and
state governments for adherence to UN Agenda 21 schemes, their work is easy.

It is up to us to recognize that the sustainable
legislation we are unknowingly pushing our elected officials to approve are
contributing to the loss of our independence and sovereignty as a
Constitutional Republic governed by our own laws.

Once we do this, we will no longer be manipulated into supporting the UN’s
global governance agenda and once again be a free nation.