Sometime in the not-too-distant future, the University of Louisville may have its own downtown basketball arena. The alarmists are out again, with the scare messages about the KFC Yum! Center.

They want to change the composition of the Arena Authority to include business people without any connection to UofL, giving preference to those with experience in arena and stadium operations. They also want to remove the right of the university to have authority to approve leasing of the arena, an arrangement that enables UofL to block University of Kentucky “home” games at the arena.

"This is the very thing the university wanted to avoid by building an on-campus arena," said William A. Stone, a member of the UofL Board of Overseers. "The group has trivialized their own efforts with the silliness of their demands.

Equally curious, they want to use the force of the Kentucky Legislature to pressure a renegotiation of the lease “to a level of fairness allowing the arena sufficient revenues to, at least, pay its expenses and annual debt service by June 30, 2013.”

Denis Frankenberger, a former local business owner, held a press conference Thursday to announce what everybody already knows — that the arena is faced with the threat of defaulting on the construction bonds. He warns that Louisville and Kentucky taxpayers will be settled with the debt.

Frankenberger says that the Arena Authority loses $33,235 per UofL men’s basketball game and $87,624 for each women’s game in the facility. He concludes that the project will never pay for itself while the the University of Louisville continues to make millions of dollars annually.

The university, it should be remembered, originally wanted an on-campus facility before caving into political pressure. The arena would never have been constructed without UofL’s involvement. Negotiations led to some of the following advantages for UofL (there are many more):

88% of revenues from the lease of 71 private suites.

Exclusive use and control of private suites at all times.

Two free suites for the President and Athletic Director.

Arena responsible for maintenance and janitorial services.

All proceeds from programs and program advertisements.

50% of all payments from third party concessions, including the gift shop, and catering sales.

All revenues from side court VIP seating ($10,000 per season).

10% of all permanent signage inside and outside the arena.

100% of all license fees from TV, radio, motion picture or other recordings.

Share equally with arena all net revenues from NCAA events.

Scheduling priority and priority use of the arena.

Discounted prices for faculty, staff, students and Letterman’s Club.

Generous to be sure. More than likely, however, UofL would have enjoyed even more amenities and financial benefits with its own on-campus arena. The city accepted UofL’s terms because city officials were desperate for a downtown arena. Now with a different administration, it’s a different tune, at least from the group headed by Frankenberger.

Expecting any kind of consensus from the community leadership, the Kentucky General Assembly, and a successful renegotiation of leasing terms is wildly optimistic and unlikely to occur. Attorneys would still be filing legal briefs a couple of years from now.

“This is the very thing the university wanted to avoid by building an on-campus arena,” said William A. Stone, a member of the UofL Board of Overseers. “The group has trivialized their own efforts with the silliness of their demands.

“It is the responsibility of the city and state to meet their financial obligations by spending money on something that is concrete and productive, as opposed to all the feel-good projects in which they get involved, ” he added, noting such examples as Light Up Louisville and Operation Brightside.

Part of the lease agreement is that, in the case of a foreclosure, UofL as the primary tenant would have 90 days to give notice to the mortgage holder that it will purchase the property on the terms and price set forth in the offer.

Something that makes me laugh is the number of UK fans that have taken such an interest in this story under the guise of just wanting to do what’s best for the city and state. Nevermind that every solution they propose also just happens to negatively impact U of L. Who knew their fan base contained so many facility management experts? And where were they years ago when this deal was made?

Many of them were riled up over this way before Frankenberger’s presser. There is a portion of their fan base (most of whom just happen to be devotees of an unnamed UK propaganda Web site) that has had a strange fixation with the arena ever since it opened. Unfortunately, I know a few of them and it’s been really weird to witness.

I’m no expert on these matters but if they can’t even make a profit on U of L men’s basketball games that are almost always at capacity with most attendees purchasing concessions and beer, what in the world can they make money on? It sounds like weapons-grade incompetence on part of the management of the place to me.

I’m a UofL alumnus and supporter, but the deal needs to be renegotiated. You can’t have one side making millions and the other side going broke. UofL needs to step up and do the right thing. And don’t say that it should go broke and UofL can buy it. What about the bondholders that paid good money to allow the arena to be built?

This really sounds like some disgruntled UK fans want to hold UK games in our arena and that will magically make them more money so the arena won’t be in such dire financial condition. Just build your own arena and let us be. The Arena Authority agreed to the contract with UofL, no matter how one sided it may seem. Like in any other business, live up to yuor word and honor the contract by figuring out a way to make it work. They agreed to it to begin with knowing how it benefitted UofL. Why should the university be asked to renegotiate becasue the state authority put in charge of it can’t run it properly.

Recent Comments

Charlie Springer: Agree on all counts. Good to see the old offensive approach back again.

wajichico: Seeing the team move without the ball was the most uplifting takeaway from the FSU game, in my mind. Given the “go for the 12 point shot”, “I got this”, superhero style in which the offense was run in the past, there was no need for the...

Charlie Springer: Very good points on all counts, sir. I hope he is found innocent of the most recent charges. And if the charges are false, that the finger pointers pay a heavy price.

porkins: he isn’t guilty of anything yet, except in the forum of public opinion. let this play out first. if he is guilty than let him rot, hang, be castrated, whatever. if he’s not though, he is still tarnished for the rest of his life. he is guilty of being a...

Jim Reed: Well, I believe “the kid” is 23 years old, so just when is he old enough to be held accountable as an adult? Now, we learn two different, serious charges have been lodged against him and an arrest warrant has been issued.