Far many more CIS GENDERED MEN and WOMEN than trans identifying people.

Pedophilia and Sexuality are not the same thing as Gender Identity.

Anyone can make a YouTube video and conduct interviews with opinionated people. It is terrible that some of these people experienced these crimes, however these statistics have been very minimal compared to the many violent crimes that are committed by non trans people. Just look at the shooting and murder rate in our city alone.

Your claims are merely opinion unless you can back them with facts on trans people performing heinous acts against women. Let's not forget that women can also rape men. Shouldn't you be worried about child molesting priests in the religion you continue to believe in instead? Isn't that like staying in an abusive relationship as it is?

I'm a 35 year old woman and I think you are a fucking wack job and a half. I don't justify anyone being violated in that manner, I just don't understand how some CISGENDERED MALE being a pervert has anything to do with trans women and gay priests.

Quote:

Yvonne wrote:Quote:

fat-ass-bike wrote:Hi Yvonne All,

Would you like me to make an appointment for you?

I can schedule anytime that suits and all you have to do is rock up - This is the address; 179 Palisade Ave, Jersey City 07306

If you like, you can make your own booking; +1 201-795-8375

So you think a woman being violated is something to dismiss? Suppose it was your family member bike? Would you dismiss it? The next victim might be a rape victim. I dont't know who is sicker, the prevert who filmed this woman or the people on jclist who justify what happened to this woman. http://nypost.com/2015/04/14/woman-at ... bathroom-of-gramercy-bar/

I can schedule anytime that suits and all you have to do is rock up - This is the address; 179 Palisade Ave, Jersey City 07306

If you like, you can make your own booking; +1 201-795-8375

So you think a woman being violated is something to dismiss? Suppose it was your family member bike? Would you dismiss it? The next victim might be a rape victim. I dont't know who is sicker, the prevert who filmed this woman or the people on jclist who justify what happened to this woman. http://nypost.com/2015/04/14/woman-at ... bathroom-of-gramercy-bar/

I take option 3, the bigot who uses this incident to blame transgendered persons even though they did not play any role in this whatsoever.

I can schedule anytime that suits and all you have to do is rock up - This is the address; 179 Palisade Ave, Jersey City 07306

If you like, you can make your own booking; +1 201-795-8375

So you think a woman being violated is something to dismiss? Suppose it was your family member bike? Would you dismiss it? The next victim might be a rape victim. I dont't know who is sicker, the prevert who filmed this woman or the people on jclist who justify what happened to this woman. http://nypost.com/2015/04/14/woman-at ... bathroom-of-gramercy-bar/

foshizigity00 wrote:what is hilarious about this thread is that OP posted an article that had nothing to do with a transgender person in a woman's space and used it somehow as a reason that transgender people should have rights restricted. a man who identified as a man and dressed as a man was creeping in a ladies dressing room.... which is something men have done from time to time, this certainly isn't the first time something like this has happened... so exactly how is this a conversation about transgender and how do you not understand the difference? cause how one logically gets from a to b (b being your asinine argument "allowing transgenders in women's spaces opens the door to men in general") is absurd. the issue in this article is that there was a creepy man in a ladies dressing room. focus.

also your subject says "woman filed as HE undressed"... but the person filmed was a female human who identified as a woman so it seems you misunderstand basic use of pronouns too.

Don't forget that she also transmogrified this into a point about priests (including gay priests) molesting children. Crazy-

what is hilarious about this thread is that OP posted an article that had nothing to do with a transgender person in a woman's space and used it somehow as a reason that transgender people should have rights restricted. a man who identified as a man and dressed as a man was creeping in a ladies dressing room.... which is something men have done from time to time, this certainly isn't the first time something like this has happened... so exactly how is this a conversation about transgender and how do you not understand the difference? cause how one logically gets from a to b (b being your asinine argument "allowing transgenders in women's spaces opens the door to men in general") is absurd. the issue in this article is that there was a creepy man in a ladies dressing room. focus.

also your subject says "woman filed as HE undressed"... but the person filmed was a female human who identified as a woman so it seems you misunderstand basic use of pronouns too.

Yvonne wrote:Well thank God, the Catholic Church has changed its policy of allowing gay men entering the priesthood because it was the gay men not straight men who molested the kids. Similary, the actor Corey Feldman wrote a book about Hollywood elites molesting child actors. I wonder how many Hollywood elites in percentages are molesting children? However, none of this has anything to do with a man entering the changing room of JC Penney. http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainm ... -coreys-article-1.1490863

What culture we are pushing is that everything should be videotaped/photographed. Go to a concert and see how many people are actually watching the music through their own eyes vs their phone screens.

Why don't you start a vigilante group? Or are you afraid a transwoman might join the group?

Quote:

Yvonne wrote:No, the culture that some are pushing, are opening the doors for perverts. Perverts are not stupid, they are taking advantage of laws that allow them to abuse women. Yes, taping a woman who is changing her clothes is an abuse. It is a violation to her sense of security.

Well thank God, the Catholic Church has changed its policy of allowing gay men entering the priesthood because it was the gay men not straight men who molested the kids. Similary, the actor Corey Feldman wrote a book about Hollywood elites molesting child actors. I wonder how many Hollywood elites in percentages are molesting children? However, none of this has anything to do with a man entering the changing room of JC Penney. http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainm ... -coreys-article-1.1490863

Not one of the 6 transgender people I personally know are interested in being sexual predators. They are all just trying to live their life, in fact nobody except those of us who knew them years ago even know their birth gender now.

If someone is willing to go through the surgeries and hormones, they probably have other things on their mind besides watching women undress.

The HEAD IN THE SAND culture that some are pushing are opening more doors for PERVERTED PRIESTS. Perverts are not stupid, they are taking advantage of laws that allow them to abuse kids. Yes taping a kid who is changing clothes is abuse.

I think kids and women are safer in the Jersey City malls than in the Catholic Church!

No, the culture that some are pushing, are opening the doors for perverts. Perverts are not stupid, they are taking advantage of laws that allow them to abuse women. Yes, taping a woman who is changing her clothes is an abuse. It is a violation to her sense of security.

And like the situation in Jersey City, this is the result of store managements failure to have someone monitoring the changing rooms! This has zero to do with the transgender access issue, and everything to do with corporate culture - so long as you reduce loss prevention (no doubt whatever the poor woman was trying on had those tags, you can be less confident the store even has security cameras) the store has done it's duty.

If you are so concerned about women's comfort and safety in changing rooms, write to the CEO's and ask them to settle for a 95 foot yacht, as opposed to a 115 foot yacht, and spend the balance of decent staffing and/or security in their stores!

In both of the cases you mention, the perpetrator was a man, dressed like a man. In neither case did the act have anything to do with transgendered people, or with bathrooms, and in both cases the offending person would be charged with a crime.

The illegal acts that happened here were already illegal. Please explain to me how a bill banning trans people from bathrooms would have solved any of these problems?

And don't give me this completely unproveable nonsense about "well the bill is letting people think they can do whatever!" Because neither article quotes the guy using transgender rights as a rationale. And that would also require us to pretend that there have never been peeping toms ever before. You're stretching so much you should join a gymnastic team.

Hello Yvonne,I generally try to stay away from the more controversial matters on this list and use it merely as a tool for info. For that reason, I rarely read the threads that you are involved in. I thought the posts of yours I perused in the past were simply misguided but with good intentions. After reading your comments here on this thread, a mistake, I’m now of the belief that you are either a menace or unbalanced. Take your pick. I wish there was a function to on this site so one could ignore certain users.