Dr KARL SHUKER

Zoologist, media consultant, and science writer, Dr Karl Shuker is also one of the best known cryptozoologists in the world. Author of such seminal works as Mystery Cats of the World (1989), The Lost Ark: New and Rediscovered Animals of the 20th Century (1993; greatly expanded in 2012 as The Encyclopaedia of New and Rediscovered Animals), In Search of Prehistoric Survivors (1995), The Unexplained (1996), Mysteries of Planet Earth (1999), The Beasts That Hide From Man (2003), and more recently Extraordinary Animals Revisited (2007), Dr Shuker's Casebook (2008), Karl Shuker's Alien Zoo: From the Pages of Fortean Times (2010), Cats of Magic, Mythology, and Mystery (2012), Mirabilis: A Carnival of Cryptozoology and Unnatural History (2013), Dragons in Zoology, Cryptozoology, and Culture (2013), A Manifestation of Monsters (2015), Here's Nessie! (2016), and what is already considered to be his magnum opus, Still In Search Of Prehistoric Survivors (2016), his many fans have been badgering him to join the blogosphere for years. The CFZ Blog Network is proud to have finally persuaded him to do so.

Friday, 13 June 2014

THE PARTRIDGE CREEK MONSTER - A LIVING DINOSAUR IN THE YUKON?

The Arctic
wastelands of the Yukon Territory, on the borders
of Canada and Alaska, are surely the
last place anyone might expect to meet a dinosaur - which is why the following
case merits a prominent place among the dubitanda of cryptozoology.

The
extraordinary tale of the beast from Partridge Creek debuted on 15 April 1908, within the pages of a French journal
called Je Sais Tout ('I Know All'), and was recounted by one of the creature's
eyewitnesses, French traveller Georges Dupuy. According to Dupuy, the adventure
had begun one day in 1903, when a banker from San Francisco called James Lewis
Buttler and a local gold prospector named Tom Leemore were hunting three large
moose amid the marshy tundra countryside near the Yukon's Clear Creek, about 100 miles east of Dawson City. Suddenly, one
of these burly deer raised its head as if it had heard something unexpected in
the vicinity, and just as it did so a second member of the trio emitted a loud
bellow of alarm, sending all three of them fleeing southwards with all speed.

A hunted
moose fleeing the scene, an engraving from 1897 by Arthur Heming

Standing 7
ft at the shoulder and weighing up to half a ton, as the world's
largest living species of deer the moose is not a creature to be readily
intimidated by anything - which is why the two hunters were so surprised by
their quarry's impromptu flight. When they reached the spot from where the
moose had fled, however, the reason for these creatures' uncharacteristic
behaviour became clear - there in the snow was the clear impression of an
enormous body belonging to some unidentifiable beast of monstrous proportions.

The beast's
belly had ploughed into the river bed's swampy mud a massive furrow 30
ft long, 12 ft wide, and 2
ft deep, which was flanked by gigantic footprints measuring 2.5
ft across and 5 ft in length, each
also yielding impressions of sharp 1-ft-long claws. Completing the clues left
behind by this unseen goliath was the imprint of a mighty 10-ft-long tail
spanning 16 in across its
middle.

The
first of two illustrations depicting the Partridge Creek monster in the Je
Sais Tout article

Notwithstanding
the nightmarish visions conjured up by such dramatic dimensions, the two men
decided to follow the monster's tracks, which led after several miles to a
gulch known as Partridge Creek, where the tracks simply came to an end - giving
the men cause to speculate that it must have leapt directly up into the gulch's
encompassing cliffs.

Following this,
they made their way by canoe along the McQuestenRiver to the nearby
outpost of Armstrong Creek - an Indian village where Buttler had earlier
arranged to meet Dupuy to take him hunting, and which was home to the Reverend
Father Pierre Lavagneux, a French-Canadian Jesuit priest. When Dupuy and the
priest heard about the monster, they were highly sceptical at first, but
eventually Buttler persuaded them to return to Partridge Creek with Leemore and
himself in a second search for it, aided by some local Indians.

After a day's
intensive but fruitless search of the immediate area and some distance beyond
it in all directions, however, the party of weary beast hunters had resigned
themselves to failure, and decided to establish camp at the top of a rocky
ravine. Thoughts of confronting monsters had been largely suppressed by the
more practical goal of preparing a warm meal - until, wholly without warning,
they received a terrifying reminder of the reason for their presence there. A
hideous roar broke the Arctic stillness, and as the startled hunters reached
for their rifles, one of them pointed with shaking hand to the opposite side of
the ravine - where the crimson rays of the dying sun revealed a heart-stopping
sight. A veritable monster in every sense of the word was clambering up its
slope!

The
second of two illustrations depicting the Partridge Creek monster in the Je
Sais Tout article

Black in colour,
at least 50 ft long, and
estimated by Buttler to weigh about 40 tons, their horrific visitor continued
to climb upwards for a time, mercifully unaware of its terrified human
eyewitnesses' close proximity. When it was about 200 paces away, it paused for
10 minutes or so, furnishing them with ample opportunity to observe it at close
range in all its spine-chilling glory. Although profusely splattered with thick
mud, its hide could be seen to bear many coarse, grey-black bristles like those
of a wild boar, and a hideous mass of blood and saliva oozed from its cavernous
jaws. Most remarkable of all, however, was the rhino-like horn perched
prominently if somewhat incongruously near the end of its snout.

The Indians
cowered in terror behind a large rock, and the others were rendered momentarily
speechless by the monstrous apparition, but when it became clear that it had
not detected them the priest gained sufficient control of his voice to whisper
between still-chattering teeth: "A ceratosaurus...It's a ceratosaurus of
the Arctic Circle!". Ceratosaurusnasicornis was a large
flesh-eating bipedal dinosaur of the Jurassic Period, related to the later,
larger Tyrannosaurus rex and readily identified via the large horn near
the tip of its upper jaw.

As they
continued to watch, the beast suddenly reared up onto its massive hind legs
like a hellish kangaroo, gave voice to an ear-splitting roar again, and then
disappeared back down into the ravine via a single immense bound. Not too
surprisingly, the beast hunters found that the thrill of pursuing this creature
had lost its former charm, and the following morning they journeyed back to
Armstrong Creek. Dupuy later attempted to interest the Canadian governor at DawsonCity in supplying
them with a large-scale hunting party of mules and 50 armed men, but when this
failed he returned home to France.

The matter was
not quite over, however, for in January 1908 he received a letter from Father
Lavagneux, dated Christmas Day 1907, in which the
priest informed him that on Christmas Eve, and while in the company of ten
Indians, he had seen their monstrous quarry once again - this time racing at
speed over the creek's frozen river, with what seemed to be the carcase of a
caribou clamped between its great jaws. Tracks identical to those found back in
1903 were clearly visible in the deep mud, and were followed by Lavagneux and
company for at least two miles before being obliterated by falling snow.

That appears to
have been the last time that the beast of Partridge Creek was spotted, either
by Lavagneux or by anyone else, for there does not seem to be any further
records on file alluding to this extraordinary creature. Bearing in mind,
however, that the existence of such an entity calls for our belief not only in the
post-Cretaceous persistence of an endothermic hairy dinosaur but also its existence in what must
surely be the least compatible habitat for any type of large reptile living
today, its lack of cryptozoological credibility should hardly come as a great
surprise!

20 comments:

So convenient that they just happened to spot one of the relatively few known species of dinosaurs in 1908. And that it just happened to have the dragging tail reconstructions of the Ceratosaurus at the time featured, but that we know are completely wrong now.

Birds belong to suborder theropoda, too... :) Ceratosaurus is ceratosaurians. Scientific definition of ceratosaurian is:´Ceratosaurs are members of a group of theropod dinosaurs defined as all theropods sharing a more recent common ancestry with Ceratosaurus than with birds.´ Tyrannosaurus is maniraptoran, the group where birds belong, closely related to pidgeon than ceratosaurus.

Yes, I am aware of all this. But your original comparison did not involve birds, it involved your incorrect claim that wombats and jackals were as closely related to one another as Ceratosaurus was to Tyrannosaurus, a mistake on your part that I corrected.

Yes, I had to choose a close related animal, for example golden jackal and whale or human, not marsupial, my mistake. I just want to corrected your claim that ceratosaurus and tyrannosaurus are closely related - they didn´t. Velociraptor and tyrannosaurus, or pidgeon and tyrannosaurus are more closely related than tyrannosaurus and ceratosaurus, and both are completelly different animal.

Firstly, large dinosaurs of that kind didn't drag their tails, as was implied by the tracks the men found. Even accounting for 65 million years of evolution, I doubt such a trait would evolve, especially since it would damage the tail and make it easy to follow the animal.

Second, the tracks shouldn't have ended at a cliff. A theropod dinosaur doesn't strike me as the suicidal type...

Finally, how would the priest have known what a Ceratosaurus is? It's 1903, and this is a pretty remote corner of the world we're talking about. Dinosaurs wouldn't be too well known to a priest living in the Yukon.

Additionally, your claim that endothermic Arctic dinosaurs seems unlikely considering the fact that Alaska has actually turned up an impressive amount of dinosaur fossils. Believe it or not, in the Late Cretaceous, even the coldest reaches of the Arctic were home to dinosaurs. Additionally, dinosaurs were indeed endotherms, as recent studies have revealed, perhaps even to a greater degree than mammals!

Though I find this report as incredible as you do, nonetheless, I like the idea of a living theropod dinosaur roaming the far north...

It wasn't an endothermic dinosaur per se that I considered unlikely, but an endothermic hairy dinosaur, bearing in mind that we now know that they would be more likely to have been feathered. Also, you are a little out of date re claiming that dinosaurs may have been even more endothermic than mammals - on the contrary, the most recent view is that they were mesothermic: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27794723 12 June 2014.

I like that the creature was covered in course hairs, which remind one of the proto-feathers some dinosaurs are claimed to have, but are strikingly unlike what a person in the early twentieth century would expect a prehistoric reptile to have. But everything said about the posture seems correct. That view of theropods has changed, and betrays the age in which the report was recorded.

It really doesn't.. especially the supposed letter from the priest describing the beast as "racing at great speed" at a time when even the most educated still thought of all dinosaurs as slow, lumbering, barely mobile beasts.

Cheers Mark, glad you like it. Re this particular case: no doubt about it, this was assuredly a hoax,, but at the time that I first documented it, in 1995 within my Prehistoric Survivors book, it was all but unknown within the cryptozoological community, so it definitely deserved an airing, if only to see if it elicited any additional reports or documentation - which, apart from a brief Notes & Queries report basically asking the same thing, it didn't. During the early 1900s, many magazines and newspapers seemed perfectly happy to fill gaps with sensationalised fiction portrayed as fact, and this is clearly one such example, but entertaining nonetheless, which was, I suppose, its primary purpose anyway. All the best, Karl

More of a comment on the other comments than the article, but, people above have mentioned the account saying the creature "dragged it's tail"... nowhere in the account did it elude to tail dragging, the only mention of the tail was in a description of a body imprint in the bank of the river as if the creature had settled down into the mud as crocodiles and alligators tend to do.

SHUKERNATURE SURVIVAL

If you'd like to assist me in my ongoing crypto-investigations, even the smallest donation would be immensely appreciated. All donations are non-profit-making, going exclusively towards the updating/maintenance of my crypto-archives' source material and other necessities that enable me to continue researching and blogging my findings right here for you on ShukerNature. Thank you so much for your help! - Karl

ShukerNature Followers

Subscribe To

Contributors

DISCLAIMER

In Accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, any copyright material on display here is under Fair Use without any claim of ownership or any profit accrued by the display. The Material herein is for non-profit educational or criticism puposes only. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work including reproduction and distribution of said material as specified in that section, for purposes of education, news reporting, commentary or criticism, scholarship or research, to persons who have expressed a prior interest in receiving such material for such purposes, is NOT an infringement. Also: Unless stated otherwise, all illustrations in ShukerNature blog articles that are credited to a named copyright owner plus Wikipedia have been made available by the copyright owner and Wikipedia for third-person use under the conditions of the Creative Commons Licence. Should any copyright holder of any of the illustrations included on ShukerNature not wish those illustrations to be included here, please contact me and I shall of course remove them.

ATTRIBUTION

All original content on this blog is the exclusive copyright of Dr Karl Shuker, with all rights reserved by him, and must NOT be reproduced in any manner without his strict permission in writing.