Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:43:41 AMblind partisanship is how people in government keep theyre jobs as long as they keep turning us against ourselves they still get paid and never need to get any thing done because we are all too buisy arguing

@HolyGod Your blind partisanship is sickening.Haaaaaahahaaaa. Sorry, that's going to keep me chuckling for weeks. Physician, heal thyself. Go on, throw in a few references to "Libtards" and "See, we Righties are always right, as usual" for good measure.

Twat.

p.s. Fixed it for ya, so it no longer reads "Obama And The Voices Or Tyrrany" but rather "Obama And The Voices Of Tyranny". Still full of absolute dick, but at least it's in English.

I've taken a quiz that states I align with Democrats on issues 60% of the time and Republicans 40% of the time. But I'm sickeningly partisan while he self admits to aligning with republicans 100% of the time. Dumb hypocritical little lemming.

@HolyGod: Obama met with Colleen Kelly the day before the IRS "scrutiny" began. THE... DAY... BEFORE... I'm sure it's PURE coincidence, eh? Not a conspiracy: It's in the "White House Visitors Log" which is linked at the site...

I'm sure the Director of the IRS just "happened" to "randomly" select ALL of one political party's applications for EXCESSIVE scrutiny... a trillion to one odds!

Ok let's see. If these 3 things had happened under Bush, where would they be on the list of f.uckup severity?

Let's see....

When you have things like:

3,000 AMERICANS DYING IN AN ATTACK ON AMERICAN SOIL or AN ENTIRE AMERICAN CITY BEING DESTROYED AND 1,800 PEOPLE DYING or A WAR STARTED ON LIES RESPONSIBLE FOR 10S OF THOUSANDS OF DEATHS or THE CREATION OF THE PATRIOT ACT THAT GAVE THE GOVERNMENT THE AUTHORITY TO DO WHAT IT DID WITH THE AP

Where on the list do I put "some people had to wait a little longer than normal to get their tax stuff done" or "4 Americans die in a country far away and the facts were wrong for a couple weeks then corrected."

Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:24:05 PMCan people just get a thesaurus or something? These phrases of the month get wearisome quickly...'tyranny', 'transparent', 'knee-jerk', etc.; they seem to just crop up, become repeated hypnotically and then gradually fade out...

It's better to use your own words, particularly when the repeating word is as vague as hell

Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:51:02 PMAnd the AP is a new story, so most people talking about it in any context are speculating and/or blowing smoke. But you say nobody has linked Obama to actions of the Justice Department? It's as though you think Obama isn't in charge of anything, especially not an Executive Department.

If it is found that the Justice Department acted inappropriately, it is the president's fault. Otherwise, he is responsible for nothing. And I sure hope that the Justice Department (i.e. The Obama Administration) is not going to investigate itself.

Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:46:08 PMLOL holygod, I'm so amused that Kool Aid drinkers have found perfectly implausible explanations to absolve Obama of any blame for any of these scandals.

The Treasury Department has already been found to have known about the IRS scandal in 2012. More information is coming every day. I really wish people were more skeptical.

Either the administration did know about these scandals, or they are so incompetent and they are not in charge of anything - as though the government were somehow too big for them to control. I don't know which one I would fear more.

Go back to the best litmus test for this, "If Bush had done X".

If in the Bush years they tried to hide that Benghazi was a terrorist attack and blame an innocent person on the attack to save its terror record, imagine.

If during Bush, the IRS did this same thing, causing groups like Media Matters to wait over 3 years for status, and asking for their facebooks, imagine.

Nobody has even remotely linked obama to the AP siezures by the justice department.

The Benghazi talking points have been shown to correlate with the information the administration received from the intelligence community. Then when that was proven false they changed their statements to reflect the more accurate information.

Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:14:35 PMThese should be called "5Cats Thinks He's an American Part ###" The IRS was doing its job! These groups are violating the spirit of the law if not the letter. They are nothing more than political money laundering groups funneling money into SuperPACs, which is NOT what a non-profit is supposed to be doing. This to hide donors and the IRS needs to bust their right-wing a$$e$ and lock 'em up for subsidizing SuperPACs with taxpayer $$$$$.