My
question regards the surprise resignation of CIA
chief Petraeus. Is it truly a matter of having an affair to end
the service of a man who has served his country for so many years?
Is there more involved? Any relation to the pending
announcement? http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/09/15054517-cia-director-david-petraeus-resigns-cites-extramarital-affair?lite
[and from another]http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/panetta-demotes-general-who-led-africa-command-for-lavish-travel-and-spending
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has demoted the former head of
U.S. Africa Command who was accused of spending thousands of dollars
on lavish travel and other unauthorized expenses. The demotion came
after retired Army Gen. David Petraeus resigned as CIA director
because of an extramarital affair and Marine Gen. John Allen was being
investigated for potentially improper communications with a woman. [and from another] http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/5-us-generals-reprimanded-or-investigated-in-past-2-weeks
5 US generals reprimanded or investigated in past 2 weeks. CIA
Director David Petraeus, the former four-star general and top
commander in Afghanistan, resigned as spy chief after the FBI
uncovered evidence that he was having an extramarital affair with his
biographer, Paula Broadwell. Ward, former head of U.S. Africa
Command, was demoted and ordered to repay more than $82,000 for
inappropriate and lavish spending on travel. Brig. Gen. Jeffrey
Sinclair is facing multiple sexual misconduct charges, including
forcible sodomy, involving five women, including female officers who
served with him. Gen. John Allen, top U.S. commander in Afghanistan,
is under investigation for potentially inappropriate communications
with Florida socialite Jill Kelley. Adm. James Stavridis, Supreme
Allied Commander of NATO, was cautioned by Navy Secretary Ray Mabus to
exercise better oversight of his staff after an investigation into
travel and expense questions, including a trip to a wine dinner in
France.

If the DIA and the CIA were the primary source of the 3% fighting to keep
the cover-up in place, what might they be planning to unseat Obama?
Petraeus and Allen were both among the top brass working to keep the
cover-up, and trying to embarrass Obama. When Libya erupted, the embassy
attack, it was at the hand of Israel who hoped to make Romney look strong,
Obama a failure in the Middle East. But al Queda was an opportunist and
mustered a stronger attack against the Libyan embassy, and this fact was
kept from the White House by Petraeus, though his excuse is that he was
keeping covert operations secret. How else were Rice and the initial
briefing of the Congressional committee ignorant of the fact?

Petraeus hoped to make the Obama administration look inept, and the truth
is only now coming out. Thus as soon as Obama had won the election, those
within the administration who knew this approached him about replacing
Petraeus, with the information they had in hand for some time – the
affair. This is obviously not an accident, as these two generals are in
powerful positions and the planned announcement ran amuck of the cover-up
crowd, of which the DIA is a player. Petraeus was forced to resign, though
Obama feigned reluctance. The FBI was instructed to involve Allen, as his
flirtations were likewise known. Both these men have now been removed from
power, and others within the military wanting to block Obama’s
announcement have gotten the message.

The plan in midsummer was to put those who were aggressively carrying out
the Reagan Executive Orders for secrecy on the approach of Planet X via
assassination under house arrest until after
the announcement. But how does one do this to the Director of the CIA or
someone as powerful as General Allen, currently under consideration for
promotion to a yet more powerful position? House arrest was not
possible, but removing them from power and diminishing their status within
the military is possible. Three other generals were added to the mix
– Sinclair, Stavridis, and Ward – all prosecuted almost simultaneously
though their offenses were known for months or even years. The 3% are
being warned.

Now the Obama administration has won
a second term what is going through their heads in relation to the
announcement? With all the major obstacles dealt with prior to
the election are they ready to try again or are they going to wait
until after Xmas in the New Year? With the Mayan date close by
do they want to wait until this has passed so the populace do not link
this false end of the world date and Planet X together and panic or do
they perhaps want to do it this year so people make an association
between the two and start thinking about the end of the world and
consider that the calendar is a bit of out sync and therefore start to
think that the passing will be more extreme than what the announcement
implies (assuming the announcement does not mention a Pole Shift as an
outcome)? [and from another] http://www.iawwai.com/MuslimProphecies.html
A central tenet of the Muslim faith is the future coming of Imam
Mahdi or the Imam at the end of time. He is also known as Q'aim or the
promised one. Mahmoud Armhedhinajad is a firm believer in the imminent
arrival of Imam Mahdi. Almost every one of his major speeches make
references to the Mahdi and has even said that he expects his arrival
within a matter of a few years.

Will the supposed end of the Mayan Calendar on December 21, 2012 create a
conflict for the planned announcement of the presence of Planet X by
Obama? This was always a concern, but the visibility of the Planet X
complex in the skies and the increasing Earth wobble has pressed the
establishment to make this announcement as soon as possible. It matters
not if the announcement comes before or after the December date, as the
connection will be made by some in the public. The connection will also be
made to Biblical talk of the End Times, the Rapture about to happen, the
Antichrist about to emerge, and a final battle about to erupt in the
Middle East. Muslims would look for their Madhi to arrive.

The announcement also runs amuck of all the cover-up excuses that have
been used – Global Warming, Solar Flares, Quad Poles on the Sun, a skewed
Galactic Plane, various comets such as Elenin, or earthquakes caused by
HAARP. None of these have any
basis in fact but will continue to be argued with even more vehemence
after the announcement as the real
cause of the Earth changes, because those who promulgated these lies don’t
want egg on their faces. It will even be claimed that the real cause of
the Earth changes – Planet X – is itself a lie.

The press to finally explain to the public why the Earth has a wobble,
erratic weather, increasing earthquakes, and bright orbs around the Sun
has not gone away. Those perpetuating the cover-up concluded that unless
they explain, the public will realize the truth on their own and blame the
government for the cover-up. If they tell the truth, they stand a chance
of being one of the good guys, rather than one of the bad guys
perpetrating a cover-up and withholding information. There is frankly no
way to avoid the circus that is about to ensue, though the announcement by
NASA is planning to include mention that Planet X has been in the inner
solar system for years, and is
moving slowly, to counter the expectation by some that something dramatic
is to happen on December 21, 2012.

The supposed end of the Mayan Calendar was, as we have explained,
incorrectly determined. It was the basis of a plethora
of books making profits, even though meticulous avoidance of a
passing planet as the cause was
the norm. The authors did not want the harassment that ZetaTalk received
for telling the truth. Thus there is little nexus between the pending
announcement by Obama and the end of the Mayan Calendar, though many
wanting the stage will attempt to make that nexus. Prophets of every color
will try to grab the stage. The circus is about to begin and there is no
avoiding it.

With the upcoming visit by President
Obama to Myanmar to meet with Aung San Suu Kyi who is one of the
most compassionate leaders of any country, and following the full
eclipse tomorrow in Australia, it appears that this could be a
synergistic moment for disclosure. There are so many major quakes in
Myanmar and I assume that his visit is going to focus on the upcoming
events, could the Zetas ascertain whether there is a coincidence in
this coming meeting? [and from
another] http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/84003.html?hp=f1
As President Barack Obama prepared Sunday to become the first
U.S. president to visit Burma, he defended his decision to make such a
historic trip even as deadly ethnic violence continues in the country
long viewed as a pariah state. Human rights groups have argued that
Obama’s trip comes before Burma’s regime has undertaken sufficient
reforms to justify such a visit. The president landed here Sunday to
begin a four-day Asia trip on which he’s set to make history by
becoming the first U.S. president to visit Burma. The trip to
Thailand, Burma and Cambodia had the potential to be a post-election,
international victory lap for Obama.

Why did Obama chose to go to Myanmar, Thailand, and Cambodia when his
schedule is crowded with the Fiscal Cliff and he is planning to restart
the announcement process? He feels he must personally warn them about his
upcoming announcement. Cambodia is where the East Asia summit is to take
place, so all the countries on the Sunda Plate will be available. But why
Myanmar and Thailand? They form the coastline across from Bangladesh and
India, which are sinking. Already there are tensions between Myanmar
and Bangladesh land. What will happen when a frantic populace from
Bangladesh and India try to migrate in earnest?

Indonesia has sought to explain the sinking in its lands with a rain
excuse, and when that failed, with claims of water extraction from the
ground causing subsidence. Malaysia is murdering their buoy
maintenance men to keep the cover-up going. What will they all do
when the truth explodes in the press? Obama has explained that the
US cannot be viewed as a haven for those displaced by the flooding, as it
will have its hands full when the New Madrid adjusts and the Aftertime
flooding arrives. Asia must look to its own, though it clearly has scarce
resources.

Where the conference is billed as an economic summit to counter China’s
influence, there is an obvious conflict in that China has land that could
absorb drowning refugees from Asia, as does Australia and New Zealand.
Australia has punished those attempting to immigrate, and New Zealand
closed its borders firmly as has China. Africa is poor and will be above
the waves that will engulf much of the world eventually, and has yet to be
explored as to its willingness to partner with countries in Asia. At the
very least, Obama is planning to tell Asia to brace for the announcement
and its likely impact on the plans of its peoples.

The Zetas have stated that the
announcement will not be made until after the election. While the
public vote will be known this week, the actual vote that elects the
President isn't until December 17 when the Electoral College registers
their official vote. Is it possible that due to a potential "rigging"
of the Electoral vote that the announcement may not come until after
December 17?

Given that Focus Groups assembled
to test the likely public reaction to Obama’s public announcement
indicated disbelief, is there any concern in the Obama administration that
restarting the announcement shortly after the election, and before the
official Electoral College vote on December 17, might cause the college to
declare him “crazy” and not fit to be President? In that NASA’s role is to
present the factual portion of the announcement, why can’t they go first?
If there are any glitches in the system to prevent Obama’s announcement
from streaming to the public, the glitch would hit NASA’s presentation,
and spare Obama embarrassment. This is the current plan.

We have seen a rapid decrease in the
buoys now reporting near Australia. A quick glance today at ndbc.noaa.gov indicates that only
four of the eleven buoys are now operational, two northwest of
Australia and two south of New Zealand. All other buoys around
New Guinea have been taken offline. The two buoys southwest of
Thailand in the Bay of Bengal are not in tsunami event mode, yet
reflect missing information. Also, north of New Guinea toward
Japan numerous other buoys are no longer relaying information. Might
the Zetas confirm if TPTB are taking these monitors offline, or if
they are truly becoming non-operational due to the ocean conditions
where they are sited.

There has been a steady pattern whereby government provided information
sources that show the visible presence of the Planet X complex, or the
twisting of the magnetosphere, or earthquake prevalence and force, or any
other means by which the public can plot or prove
that the government have been lying be removed from public view. This
happened early when the magnetic simulator located in Japan was closed
down, supposedly for lack of funds. An alternate simulator is now in
operation, which is more difficult for the public to read and understand.

SOHO has periodically been taken down ostensibly for maintenance but it
was deemed that removing this facility permanently would raise too many
question, so the SOHO was always returned to operation. Earthquakes have
long been skewed on the charts, so they are at least a magnitude lower on
average than their true magnitude.

Buoys have proven to be an embarrassment, in that they show the ocean
floor rising or falling, and in accordance with our predictions. The death
of a Malay buoy maintenance man recently, to silence him, was considered a
red flag, so buoys are not being taken out of service when they are
flagging plate movement. Being taken out of service does not mean they are
no longer operational, it simply means the public cannot be privy to the
information. One can read past the outages to see where plate movement is
occurring, thus. Just look for the newly deactivated buoys, and draw your
own conclusions!

Please tell us about the discovery
"for the history books" that NASA's Mars rover Curiosity recently
made. [and from another] http://www.space.com/18565-mars-rover-curiosity-discovery-mystery.html
Mars Mystery: Has Curiosity Rover Made Big Discovery? The
discovery was made by Curiosity's Sample Analysis at Mars instrument.
SAM is the rover's onboard chemistry lab, and it's capable of
identifying organic compounds — the carbon-containing building blocks
of life as we know it. The $2.5 billion Curiosity rover landed inside
Mars' huge Gale Crater on Aug. 5, kicking off a two-year mission to
determine if Mars has ever been capable of supporting microbial life.
In addition to analyzing soil samples, SAM also takes the measure of
Red Planet air. Many scientists are keen to see if Curiosity detects
any methane, which is produced by many lifeforms here on Earth. A SAM
analysis of Curiosity's first few sniffs found no definitive trace of
the gas in the Martian atmosphere, but the rover will keep
looking. the news will come out at the fall meeting of the American
Geophysical Union, which takes place Dec. 3-7 in San Francisco.

NASA is obviously creeping closer to announcing life on Mars, which is
patently obvious given the live mouse recently captured on film. Why now?
For decades Hoagland has tried to get NASA to film the Face on Mars with
more detail, while NASA has studiously avoided that part of Mars on their
flyover missions. When evidence of dust covered city streets, roads, and
irrigation ditches show up, NASA falls silent. Now that the high
definition Curiosity is roving about, and the results released to the
public almost directly, even more has become evident. The Annunaki were
there, Mars sustained life such as herds of goats and sheep, and sustains
life still.

The cover-up over the presence of Planet X is collapsing. The cover-up
over the presence of alien life, intelligent life other than mankind, has
proved burdensome. Having lied for decades, it is hard to come clean.
Roswell happened, and Skinny Bob was the survivor. Pilots and astronauts
have seen and filmed UFOs regularly. Why not just say it? They would
prefer to avoid the sharp slap of anger and disgust from the public, would
prefer to ease into so as to dilute the public’s anger. They will
say that Mars sustained life in the past,
hinting that such life bearing planets may exist elsewhere in the
Universe. Meanwhile, the public is meeting with the visitors on spaceships
in increasing numbers, two billion and rising as of last count, leaving
the cover-up muttering in their cups at geophysical conferences.

The head-honcho of Catholicism etc,
Joseph Ratzinger aka Pope Benedict XV1, has apparently released a book
, in which he is publicly casting doubt on the accuracy of the
purported year in which Jesus died, and thus also the accuracy of the
christian calender itself, claiming it to be up to 7 years out. Mr
Ratzinger aka the Pope stating: "The entire christian calender is
based on a miscalculation". Of course this is nothing new, however, it
is the source and timing of this being trumpeted on the web, in the
mainstream, which makes this notable. Many have cocked a suspicious
eyebrow at this, it being, most suspicious. Perhaps this is a little
obvious, but, would the Z care to enlighten us re this? Is this an
Establishment attempt to befuddle the Common Man, re when to expect
the coming Cataclysms aka Pole Shift? [and
from another]http://www.businessinsider.com/the-pope-says-the-entire-christian-calender-is-wrong-2012-11
The Pope Says The Entire Christian Calendar Is Wrong. Nov. 21,
2012. The assertion that the Christian calendar is based on a false
premise is not new – many historians believe that Christ was born
sometime between 7BC and 2BC. John Barton, Professor of the
Interpretation of the Holy Scripture at Oriel College, Oxford
University, said most academics agreed with the Pope that the
Christian calendar was wrong and that Jesus was born several years
earlier than commonly thought, probably between 6BC and 4BC. [and from another]2012
Mayan apocalypse calculation might be off. October 19, 2010. http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2010/1019/2012-Mayan-apocalypse-calculation-might-be-off
The accepted conversions of dates from Mayan to the modern
calendar may be off by as much as 50 or 100 years. That would throw
the supposed and overhyped 2012 apocalypse off by decades and cast
into doubt the dates of historical Mayan events.

If the doubts about the date of the birth of Jesus have been known for
years, why is the Pope waiting until a month prior to the supposed end of
the Mayan Calendar to make his official announcement? He is casting doubts
on many aspects of the myths
surrounding the birth of Jesus too. Question what your experts tell you,
seems to be the message. That the December 21, 2012 date for the end of
the Mayan Calendar is subject to debate is also nothing new. As we have
stated, it is wrong. This too is likely to get more press as the date
approaches, because those who have used this 2012 date to placate the
public’s anxieties about End of the World theories will need to reset.