...
FAITH AND REASON IS THE TITLE of the middle section of the book and is really its heart. From their presentation, it is clear that religion saved philosophy (Islam saved the Greek texts, then Christianity rediscovered them for the West) and for centuries faith and reason marched in step. Only in the modern era have they seemingly diverged. Faith stands, I think, not for theism but for a common sense understanding of the world, the idea that appearances and intuition can get to the truth of the world. Reason stands not for atheism or science but for the idea that appearances may be deceiving, that careful observation and a skeptical attitude are required to move from appearance to the underlying structure of reality.

As an odd illustration of the difference between the two and the triumph of reason in the Enlightenment, the authors spend a precious page at the end of the chapter talking about Adam Smith, who popularized the counterintuitive notion that self-interest was the engine of economic prosperity via the invisible hand of free markets (as opposed to the visible hand of government regulation). But faith is not so much abandoned as transferred to a new object. In the Enlightenment the new object of faith was man, with a new-found faith in his improvement, even perfectibility, via liberation and education. Today faith in God seems to be flourishing again. But I think a lesson one can draw from the authors' rather sympathetic view of the role of religion in the development of philosophy is that modern faith must be paired with a good measure of reason. Blinkered faith is no longer fashionable or sufficient.

THE AUTHORS TAKE AN UNUSUALLY BROAD VIEW of philosophy, bringing in the perspective of the great religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism as well as Christianity, Judaism, and Islam) and non-Western cultures as part of their history of philosophy. It is an unusual but enlightening appraoch. And you can look a long time before finding a shorter history of philosophy!

Comments

You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Technical notes: I've gone back to putting one paragraph on the main page, with a link to the balance of the post when there are additional paragraphs. I put the three dots simply as a placeholder for the first line of the "more" screen, so the first line of text doesn't get scrunched up to the very top of the screen, which always makes me wonder if there was text above it that got cut off.

FINALLY, RATHER THAN USING HEADINGS for sections of a post (which just seems a little pretentious for a blog post) I'm trying out all caps for the first few words of the opening paragraph of a new section. I've found that it's easier to read through a multi-paragraph post when the type is differentiated via bolding, italics, links, or caps. I know better than to tax the patience of my readers, so I'll do what I can by using such font tricks and by viciously editing my posts--I rarely go more than five paragraphs, and generally aim for three. Brevity is the soul of more than wit.

Mormon Books 2013-14

Parley P. Pratt: The Apostle Paul of MormonismGivens and Grow's warts-and-all biography of this energetic missionary, author, and apostle whose LDS career spanned Joseph Smith's life, the emigration to Utah, and Brigham Young's early leadership of the Church in Utah. My Review