End of the Heineken Cup?

Top clubs in England and France have served notice of their intention to quit the Heineken Cup and organise a rival competition as they believe the current format is weighted too heavily in favour of the Celtic nations.

Leinster and Munster have won five of the last seven Heineken Cups between them, with Leinster winning three of the last four, and their rivals in England and France believe that is partly a result of a qualification system that allows them to rest their players during the RaboDirect Pro12 season.

Dominant force: Leinster have won the Heineken Cup in three of the last four years

Premiership Rugby chief executive Mark McCafferty told the Guardian: ‘Most of the Ireland squad will not be released for the Pro12 until rounds three or four, something they could not do if they depended on their finishing position in the league for European qualification.

‘The clubs in England and France have served two years’ notice that we intend to pull out of Europe because there needs to be a level playing field.

‘So far, the response from the other countries has been slow, even though we are not sabre-rattling. We have not been locked in talks and there is no meeting about the issue until the end of next month.

‘Our view is that the qualification process needs to be changed so that it is entirely merit-based – the top teams in all three leagues as well as the winners of the Heineken Cup and the Amlin Challenge Cup should make up 20 sides taking part.’

Ready to quit: Premiership Rugby Chief Executive Mark McCafferty says English clubs are ready to set up a new competition

The English and French sides believe no more than six Pro12 teams should qualify, although that would put at risk the involvement of Scottish and Italian sides who currently qualify automatically.

‘I think those countries have effectively made that decision by forming the Pro12,’ McCafferty added.

‘It is like me saying that the Premiership has to provide a qualifier from the south-west. It cannot be good for the competition that you do not have the best sides qualifying.

‘Aironi were disbanded at the end of the last season and the newly-formed Zebres go straight into the Heineken Cup.’

McCafferty said he was not prepared to do anything to damage the Aviva Premiership in order to change the qualification system for the Heineken Cup, as the Premiership accounts for 80% of revenues compared to 20% from Europe.

‘ERC should know that we are serious and while the issue has to be resolved, everyone has to realise we cannot carry on as we are,’ he said.

‘If it is not, we would go to an Anglo-French competition and if others wanted to join us, fair enough.’

ERC has planned talks for September on the issue.

‘We have held meetings with all our shareholders and asked them to draw up proposals which will be considered at next month’s meeting,’ said a spokesman.

‘Notice was served by the French and English clubs and the French Rugby Federation at the beginning of June and it was agreed at a board meeting a few days afterwards that we would have a workshop in September after holding briefings with everyone.

‘We do not want to enter a war of words with Premiership Rugby, but we have been working away in the background and we are in the second phase of the consultation process.’

3 Comments on End of the Heineken Cup?

“GREATER POWER FOR TMOs
THE TELEVISION match officials in the Aviva Premiership will be afforded the ability to award on foul play and the scoring of tries.
The new protocols will be trialled in England’s top-flight domestic competition as part of an International Rugby Board trial. A different set of TMO rules will also be trialled in South Africa’s Currie Cup.
The English trial will see the current scope of the TMO extended to include the review of any aspect of play prior to the ball being grounded, while the referee may also call on the TMO to look over incidents of potential foul play.
The South African trial will be more restricted in what the TMO can be called upon to review while still providing additional scope to the current protocol. The main point of difference is it will only be able to judge up to two phases before a try is scored.
Results of trial will be extensively evaluated.
“