Do Common Mynas significantly compete with native birds in urban environments?

Abstract

In Australia, the introduced Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) is commonly believed to aggressively displace native birds and outcompete them for food and nest resources. However, the current paucity of scientific evidence makes it difficult to devise appropriate management strategies for protection of urban bird populations. This study investigates the way in which the Common Myna uses the urban environment and interacts with other species while foraging and nesting in Sydney, Australia. The bird community varied between habitat types along an urbanisation gradient, and the abundance of the Common Myna increased significantly with the degree of habitat modification. Surveys of the frequency of interspecific interactions revealed that the Common Myna did not initiate a significantly greater number of aggressive encounters than did other species. Focal observations of two potential native competitors showed that despite foraging in close proximity, the Common Myna rarely interfered with feeding activity. Assessment of natural tree hollow occupancy found that Common Mynas used significantly fewer tree hollows than did native species. Analysis of nest site selection indicated that Common Mynas chose to nest in more highly modified habitats, and in artificial structures rather than in vegetation. These findings suggest that, in this study area, Common Mynas have little competitive impact on resource use by native bird species in the urban matrix. The logical conclusion of these results is that the substantial efforts currently directed towards culling of Common Mynas in heavily urbanised environments is misdirected, and resources would be better directed to improvement of natural habitat quality in these areas if the purpose of control is to enhance urban bird diversity.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniel Lowe, Adrian Davis and Jenna Lowe for field assistance and the Australian Museum and Birds Australia for providing data from the Birds in Backyards program (http://www.birdsinbackyards.net). We are also grateful to Jenna Lowe for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Natural Heritage Trust (2001) Australian native vegetation assessment 2001/national land and water resources audit. Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. ACT, TurnerGoogle Scholar

New T (2006) Conservation biology in Australia: an introduction. Oxford University Press, South MelbourneGoogle Scholar

Newey P (2007) Foraging behaviour of the common myna (Acridotheres tristis) in relation to vigilance and group size. Emu 107:315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piper SD, Catterall CP (2003) A particular case and a general pattern: hyperaggressive behavior by one species may mediate avifaunal decrease in fragmented Australian forests. Oikos 101:602–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar