Bouvelles, Charles

Bouvelles, Charles

(b. Saucourt, Picardy, France, ca. 1470; d. Noyon, France, ca. 1553)

philosophy, theology, philology, mathematics.

The most important mathematical work of Bouvelles, who was also known as Charles de Bouelles, was published in three languages: in Latin as Geometricae introductionis (1503); in French as Livre singulier et utile (1542, with several later editions); and in Dutch as Boeck aenghaende de Conste en de Practycke van Geometrie (1547). According to H. Bosmans (Bibliotheca mathematica, 7 [1906], 384) this translation is a bit abbreviated. The Geometricae includes chapters on stellated polygons, which had been discussed in Bradwardine’s De geometria speculativa (1495). It is very likely that Bouvelles knew this tract, for he refers to Bradwardine in his introduction to the section on the quadrature of the circle, which also was discussed in the Geometria. Extending the sides of a regular convex polygon results in a stellated polygon of the first order; in the same way the latter can be transformed into a stellated polygon of the second order, and so on. Bouvelles started with the stellated pentagon, the first stellated polygon of the first order, and showed that the sum of its angles equals two right angles. For this he used the regularity of the polygon and showed that every angle is 36°, so the sum is 180°. After having shown that the sum of the angles of a stellated hexagon equals four right angles, he went on to the first stellated polygon of the second order, the heptagon; and, referring to his proof for the pentagon, he said that the sum of the angles of the heptagon also equals two right angles.

Bouvelles made several attempts to solve the old problem of the quadrature of the circle. In the Middle Ages there had been several treatises on that subject: the De quadratura circuli of Franco of Liège (eleventh century), the De triangulis of Jordanus de Nemore and the De quadratura et triangulatura circuli of Ramón Lull (thirteenth century), the De geometria speculativa of Bradwardine (according to Bouvelles, his quadrature is not right), and the Quaestio de quadratura circuli of Albert of Saxony (fourteenth century); the De circuli quadratura of Nicholas of Cusa (fifteenth century) was refuted by Regiomontanus, but Bouvelles agreed with it, remarking that Nicholas used infinite dimensions unknown to any geometer who would never confess that they were possible.

In the age of Bouvelles, too, there were treatises: Oronce Fine’s De quadratura circuli (1544), Jean Buteo’s De quadratura circuli (1559), and Joseph Scaliger’s Cyclometrica elementa (1594), which was refuted by Vieta in his Munimen adversus nova Cyclometrica (1594) and in his Pseudo-mesolabium (1595). In the solution given in the Livre singulier, Bouvelles considered a circle rolling along a straight line. After a quarter of a revolution, the point on the circle at which the distance from the line is equal to the radius of the circle has touched the line and has described an are of a circle, the center of which lies 5/4 r (radius) beneath the starting point of the center of the given circle. His construction agrees with the Hindu value of . Günther has seen in this the first genetic construction of the cycloid, but this is very unlikely.

In his Liber de XII numeris (1510) Bouvelles wrote on perfect numbers, i.e., numbers that are equal to the sum of all their possible factors, such as 6, 28, and 496. He asserted, without proof, that a perfect number (except 6) is always a multiple of 9, plus 1, but that the inverse is not true. This rule was given, also without proof, by Tartaglia in his General trattato di numeri et misure (1556).

In 1511 Bouvelles published the Géométrie en françoys, probably the first geometrical treatise printed in French.

Citation styles

Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA).

Within the “Cite this article” tool, pick a style to see how all available information looks when formatted according to that style. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.

Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, Encyclopedia.com cannot guarantee each citation it generates. Therefore, it’s best to use Encyclopedia.com citations as a starting point before checking the style against your school or publication’s requirements and the most-recent information available at these sites:

Modern Language Association

The Chicago Manual of Style

American Psychological Association

Notes:

Most online reference entries and articles do not have page numbers. Therefore, that information is unavailable for most Encyclopedia.com content. However, the date of retrieval is often important. Refer to each style’s convention regarding the best way to format page numbers and retrieval dates.

In addition to the MLA, Chicago, and APA styles, your school, university, publication, or institution may have its own requirements for citations. Therefore, be sure to refer to those guidelines when editing your bibliography or works cited list.