Let's NOT ban "polyamoury," despite what some may think. OK, I realise this is a concept introduced by the Church of All Worlds, a rather flaky organisation started by some fans of Ray Bradbury's "Stranger in a Strange Land" who say they picked up this concept from his book and, along with several other precepts, started a Pagan Church based thereon. (Bradbury himself was none too thrilled, I've heard.) It's not quite swinging (you tend to keep to a select group of lovers who are all on board with the concept, as opposed to different partners as often as possible), but polyamourists are also not circus freaks and would not thank you for labelling them as such. (Probably neither would swingers, come to think of it.)

This should be banned for all advice-seeking letters everywhere, on the web, in print, etc: "I am married to/dating a "wonderful" guy/girl, but.....he/she is a" [fill in the blank, usually something really bizarre.]

Every time I read a letter like this, I wonder what the definition of wonderful is if a pedophile/chronic nose picker/neanderthal/cheater still meets it.

I've just read Meredith's explanation of how and why she developed the euphemisms grilled cheese and grilled cheese sandwiches. In that same explanation, she uses the words sex and sexuality. If it's OK to use sex and sexuality, why do we need the euphemisms? She also writes, "I love a good euphemism - don't you?" NO! I can't stand them. My position is "Tell it Like it is."