To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed the entire object, paste this HTML in websiteTo link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed this page, paste this HTML in website

The statutes of Oklahoma covering ouster or removal of public officers is set forth in the Sections 5592 to 6608, inclusive of the 1910 Code. Chapter 205, page 379 of the 1917 Session Laws. Sections 2396 to 2425 of the 1921 Code. Page 104 to 112, inclusive of the Oklahoma Cr. Code. 29 Cyc. 1406. Art 18-sec 3a-charter-4499 to 4509 incl MEMORANDUM BRIEF OF OKLAHOMA CASES. 1624 falsefy records 9781 embezzlement 2029 failure to acct. ________ Pac. ___________ [illegible]Bradford vs Territory 37 Pac 1061 2 Okla. 228, Syl. No. 4. Decided June term, 1894. "The acts done by a county officer to warrant his removal from office need to be such as would subject him to a criminal prosecution, but any acts done knowingly in violation of his statutory duties are sufficient to constitute such maladministration as will forfeit his right to said office." Rutter vs Territory. [illegible] 11 Okla. 454; 68 Pac. 507, Syl. 4. Decided January term, 1902. "The accusations were sufficient in this case, having been made in ordinary and concise language, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what was intended." 24 Okla. 588; 103 Pac. 674, Syl. 3. Decided July term, 1909. Ma [illegible] vs Rossen "A proceeding under the provisions of article 4, c. 68, Wilson's Rev. & Ann. St. 1903, for the removal of a district judge, is not a criminal proceeding, but is a special proceeding." Sequoyah Co. vs [illegible] 210 Okla 565. 139 Pac 258

The statutes of Oklahoma covering ouster or removal of public officers is set forth in the Sections 5592 to 6608, inclusive of the 1910 Code. Chapter 205, page 379 of the 1917 Session Laws. Sections 2396 to 2425 of the 1921 Code. Page 104 to 112, inclusive of the Oklahoma Cr. Code. 29 Cyc. 1406. Art 18-sec 3a-charter-4499 to 4509 incl MEMORANDUM BRIEF OF OKLAHOMA CASES. 1624 falsefy records 9781 embezzlement 2029 failure to acct. ________ Pac. ___________ [illegible]Bradford vs Territory 37 Pac 1061 2 Okla. 228, Syl. No. 4. Decided June term, 1894. "The acts done by a county officer to warrant his removal from office need to be such as would subject him to a criminal prosecution, but any acts done knowingly in violation of his statutory duties are sufficient to constitute such maladministration as will forfeit his right to said office." Rutter vs Territory. [illegible] 11 Okla. 454; 68 Pac. 507, Syl. 4. Decided January term, 1902. "The accusations were sufficient in this case, having been made in ordinary and concise language, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what was intended." 24 Okla. 588; 103 Pac. 674, Syl. 3. Decided July term, 1909. Ma [illegible] vs Rossen "A proceeding under the provisions of article 4, c. 68, Wilson's Rev. & Ann. St. 1903, for the removal of a district judge, is not a criminal proceeding, but is a special proceeding." Sequoyah Co. vs [illegible] 210 Okla 565. 139 Pac 258