http://www.jewishworldreview.com --
IN HIS inaugural address, President George W. Bush issued a call to reinvigorate citizenship: "We are bound by ideals that move us beyond our
backgrounds, lift us above our interests, and teach us what it means to be citizens. Every child must be taught these principles. Every citizen
must uphold them."

Bush can do his part by eliminating one of the greatest abuses of American citizenship: the immigrant investor visa program. It has spawned a
niche market in skirting laws, scratching backs, and selling out.

This fraud-ridden scheme was created under an obscure section of the 1990 Immigration Act, signed by Bush’s father. Known as the EB-5 law,
it allows wealthy foreigners to purchase green cards by investing between $500,000 and $1 million into new commercial enterprises or troubled
businesses. After two years, foreign investors, their spouses, and children all receive permanent resident status – which allows them to
contribute to U.S. political campaigns and provides a speedy gateway to citizenship.

Making political access and the privilege of citizenship available to the highest foreign bidder offends the very ideals Bush wants to promote.
Arkansas Senator Dale Bumpers, a longtime critic of the program, noted: "All you need is green. You do not have to know anything about the
poor and huddled masses that Emma Lazarus wrote about…How crassly we demean this precious blessing we call citizenship."

Supporters of the program claimed it would attract substantial overseas investment to aid struggling American businesses. But the benefits of
this economic development plan have gone mostly to former Immigration and Naturalization Service officials, who formed lucrative limited
partnerships to cash in on their access.

Here’s how the racket worked: Immigrant investors paid token fees to these partnerships. The partnerships secured promissory notes for the
remainder of the foreign investments, which were forgiven after investors received their permanent green cards. Former INS employees,
working for these partnerships, aggressively lobbied their old colleagues to accept such bogus financial arrangements. As a result, according
to an internal U.S. Justice Department investigative report, "aliens were paying $125K" instead of the required $500,000 to $1million minimum,
and "almost all of the monies went to the General Partners and the companies who set up the limited partners."

A Baltimore Sun investigation last year found "only a tiny fraction of the money ever made it to the companies seeking assistance." Many of
the distressed U.S. firms that the program intended to help have closed because they never received promised funding.

Steven Perlman, a New York City immigration lawyer who sued the government to disclose parts of the internal investigative report, told me last
week that the EB-5 program became a "money-making machine." That wouldn’t have been possible, Perlman notes, without political protection.
One INS document indicates that officials worried about keeping "promises to the Hill." When the agency finally moved to end fraud,
"influential Members of Congress protested,'' according to the New York Times.

Key supporters of the immigrant investor visa program included Democrat Sens. Paul Simon and Ted Kennedy. Republicans embraced it, too.
Prescott Bush, W.’s uncle, was on the board of American Immigration Services, one of the leading visa vendors. So was former President
Bush’s INS commissioner, Gene McNeary. And leading GOP Sen. Mitch McConnell worked closely with the woman who was instrumental in
drafting the EB-5 law: Maria Hsia, a McConnell donor who later laundered more than $100,000 in illegal donations to the Democratic National
Committee through a California Buddhist temple.

At the time Hsia was working for McConnell and others on the immigration bill, she also worked for a campaign fund-raising group called the
Pacific Leadership Council. Hsia co-founded the PLC with Lippo Bank officials John Huang and James Riady, the chief figures in the
Clinton-Gore Donorgate scandal convicted of campaign-finance crimes. At least six Lippo Bank officials have reportedly benefited from the
EB-5 law.

Was this visas-for-sale program established to launder foreign funny money into our political system? We may never know for sure, but
President Bush should shut down this suspicious pipeline now and stop the shameless pimping of Lady
Liberty.

01/22/01: Look who supports AmeriCorps01/17/01: Some questions about Elaine Chao01/15/01: What America owes me01/10/01: Temptation and trash TV01/05/01: Cop-haters welcome in Hollywood01/02/01: Ignoring a hate crime in D.C.12/26/00: Use ultrasound to combat abortion12/26/00: Pardon Clinton? Just say no!12/21/00: Smacking down free speech12/18/00: Brace yourselves for Floridation12/14/00: Blame enviros for electric mess
12/11/00: UNICEF's deadly mission12/06/00: The Amish vs. the feds12/04/00: Downey and the Drug War11/29/00: Let the sun shine on the Supremes11/22/00: Peace prize for a murderer?11/20/00: Baby Boom parents are asleep on the job11/15/00: Fog horns of the Fourth Estate11/10/00: Who cares about election fraud now?11/08/00: Ms. Houston, you have a problem11/03/00: The Million Mom Murmur11/01/00: GOP revolutionaries head for the hills10/27/00: My impeachment referendum10/25/00: Gore’s Good Daddy Gambit10/23/00: Tribulations of a dubious 'tribe'10/20/00: Pharmaceutical butchers of Beijing10/16/00: How the West was seized10/12/00: Fight the anti-pesticide pests10/10/00: Moochers at the multiplex 10/05/00: Pay for your own day care 10/02/00: Not every senior demands a handout09/27/00: Racial hype at the Olympics09/25/00: Watch the other Washington09/20/00: Textbook case of media arrogance09/18/00: New York: Land of medical pork09/13/00: Voices from the womb09/11/00: No cure for generational pain09/08/00: Notes on a West Coast wilding09/06/00: Race matters at Washington Post09/01/00: For those who labor 24/708/28/00: There's something about Rudy08/25/00: A conservative case against Napster08/22/00: Death Row Marv mocks justice08/18/00: The party of Maxine Waters08/14/00: "Make-A-Wish" shoots down dreams08/10/00: Who will stop Bill Lann Lee?08/07/00: Emily Dickinson's lesson for rude drivers08/03/00: Leave the slogans behind07/31/00: Hey, GM: Build cars, not quotas07/28/00: Stop milking The Juice07/24/00: Silencing Jeff Jacoby07/21/00: Score another one for TV execs who want to keep us brain-dead07/17/00: Can somebody say McStupid?07/12/00: Beware of Ugly Building Syndrome07/10/00: The miracle of a lead pencil07/07/00: Partying on the people’s dime06/29/00: When "Indians" exploit their own06/23/00: Kids in a public school daze06/21/00: Fed up with Fannie and Freddie06/19/00: D.C.'s gag order for Christians 06/16/00: Dads, daughters, and PETA's spoilsports06/13/00: Tune out Eminem's pitiful "poetry"06/07/00: "Pained" Dem leader Torricelli deserves to feel some; Why hasn't he?06/05/00: Tom Green's hidden health-care lesson06/01/00: Farming out the pork05/30/00: The perils of medical quackery05/26/00: Awarding medals by race is a disgrace 05/22/00: Have Simon & Schuster execs lost their minds!? 05/17/00: Sports plebes vs. plutocrats05/15/00: Whitewashing Red China's record05/12/00: Our mothers' hands05/08/00: Focus on the real Waco 05/05/00: An Internet victim's sad story05/03/00: Phony pooh-bahs of journalism05/01/00: Zoo tragedy triggers dumb reaction04/24/00: Ecoterrorists on the loose 04/19/00: Beware of Elian's psychobabblers04/17/00: The truth about Erin Brockovich04/13/00: In defense of an armed citizenry04/10/00: Playing hardball with taxpayers04/06/00: Read W.'s lips: More new spending 04/04/00: The liberal media-in-training03/31/00: Sticking it to the children03/28/00: Declaring war on HOV lanes03/22/00: Clinton and the Echo Boomers03/17/00: Is Bush a Liddy Dole Republican?03/13/00: Katie and the politics of disease03/10/00: Maria H, Granny D, and the media Z's03/07/00: Bubba Van Winkle wakes up03/03/00: Double standard for day traders?02/28/00: Sluts and nuts --- and our daughters02/24/00: Zoning out religious freedom02/15/00: The Baby Brain Boondoggle02/10/00: Buddhist temple untouchables02/08/00: CDC: Caught Devouring Cash02/04/00: Hillary's poisoned poster child02/01/00: Corporate welfare on ice01/28/00: The silly sound of silence01/26/00: The Old Media meltdown01/20/00: The pied pipers of KidCare01/18/00: Our imperious judiciary01/14/00: Tune out Columbine chorus 01/12/00: Dying to be an American01/10/00: Time for smokers' revolt?12/30/99: Reading, writing, PlayStation?12/27/99: Fight money-grubbing mallrats 12/23/99: Christmas for Cornilous Pixley12/20/99: Who will help the Hmong?12/16/99: Shame on corn-fed politicians12/13/99: EPA vs. the American Dream12/09/99: Look behind the Pokemon curtain12/06/99: Amateur hour in Seattle11/30/99: Stop the Ritalin racketeers11/23/99: Welfare for a sports fatcat 11/19/99: Jeb Bush's political ploy of the week11/16/99: Ben & Jerry serve up junk science11/12/99: A monumental waste of our veterans' resources11/10/99: Tax-and-spend schizophrenia11/05/99: Spooky Guy Haunts the Capital 11/02/99: Mourning the loss of the last Liberty Tree10/27/99: AOL goes AWOL on parents10/22/99: The persecution of Harry Potter10/20/99: Don't doctor the law10/14/99: The trouble with kids today10/12/99: Pro-animal, pro-abortion, anti-speech?10/07/99: Beltway press corps needs more skunks09/30/99: ESPN overlooks athlete of faith, grace, and guts09/27/99: Personal freedom going up in smoke09/15/99: Farewell, "Miss" America09/10/99: Will George W. work for a color-blind America?09/03/99: Feminization of gun debate drowns out sober analysis08/27/99: America is abundant land of equal-opportunity insult 08/10/99: Protect the next generation from diversity do-goodism 08/04/99: Sweepstakes vs. state lottery: double standards on gambling07/21/99: "True-life tales from the Thin Red Line"
(or "Honor those who sacrificed their lives for peace")07/21/99: Reading, 'Riting, and Raunchiness?07/14/99: Journalists' group-think is not unity06/30/99: July Fourth programming for the Springer generation 06/25/99: Speechless in Seattle06/15/99: Making a biblical argument against federal death taxes