Any chance we'll see your latest update hit the shelves soon? The proxy support in your "testing" version seems pretty stable to me.[edit]And it's particularly frustrating to have that version get overwritten occassionally [/edit]

What about one more thing: if the proxy auth fails, can/will it revert to attempting a direct connection to download the updates?

I was wondering whether package control supports easy contributions to st2 packages? Below is my question about a good development environment for contributions to st2 packages. Maybe it's already possible with package control but if not it would be a great feature that encourages contributions to packages. I am thinking about a command like "Package Control: Contribute to Package" that automatically creates a fork, clones it to the package folder, opens the package folder as a project in st2 and fetches any changes from the original repo when restarting st2 to keep the fork up to date.

This thread need a bump, I just recevied a new version, Thanks wbond!!

A message of the version changes log says:

As Sublime Text has become increasingly more popular, and the number ofpackages has increased so rapidly, the bandwidth requirements have alsosignificantly increased. This month the default channel will very likely serveover 1TB of JSON data. If you feel so inclined, consider pitching in a smallamount to help cover the cost:http://wbond.net/sublime_packages/packa ... say_thanks . A big thank youto all of the users who have already contributed!

This is not about the bandwidth, that package is the root of all the other packages, be nice, submit any pull request you think is appropriated!

I guess 'everyone' use Sublime Text for work, and the most esencial package is Package Control. If you already purchased Sublime Text, and have some additional amount of money to show your love for Package Control, then do it.