If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Job Hunting Woes

In a few months, I will be moving to the Northern NJ area because my wife
(a vet) is starting up a practice in that area. Because of this upcoming
move, I am looking to start a new job in that area. However, thus far my
job search has been fruitless to say the least. I have a MS in Computer
Science and 8 years of experience doing software development in a variety
of relevant, in-demand languages, so I definitely I am definitely not one
of the legions of "new grads" with paper credentials and no real-world skills.
I've been around the block a few times as they say.

The most frustrating thing is that I see postings for jobs in the newpapers
and on the web (hotjobs, monster, dice, etc) advertising for positions that
I _know_ I would be perfect for. I have the skills, experience, and education
these people seem to want, yet it seems like my resume ane cover letter is
getting lost in the shuffle.

I have a couple of theories:

- With the job market tight, everybody and their mother is sending resumes
to every open position. Because of this flood of resumes, the good ones
get lost in among all of the marginal ones.

- Companies are advertising for positions that they don't want to fill.
I know of at least one company that puts ads in the paper for jobs that they
don't intend to fill because they have to satisfy H1-B visa requirements.
I would like to think that this wouldn't be a widespread trend, but given
the lack of corporate ethics these days I wouldn't be too surprised.

- Perhaps I'm not marketting myself well enough. I started out by sending
the same stock resume and cover letter to everyone. Now I am custom writing
each cover letter based upon the description of the position. Still, this
doesn't seem to help.

- I do not usually follow up with a phone call. Now I know there are those
that like to always follow up, but I haven't been doing this because I don't
want to spam anyone. I figure that these people have enough to do without
me bugging them by begging them for an interview. Besides, my resume and
cover letter has always been enough to get a response. However, I am thinking
of changing this strategy.

- I am not as perfect as I think I am. With all of the layoffs, perhaps
I am now competing with people with twice my experience and I am just not
making the first cut.

The most frustrating thing is that this is really the first time I have had
this type of trouble getting a job (not that I've been job-hopping or anything
like that). When I graduated from school in '93, the economy was just as
bad as it is now, but I was still able to get some "bites" as a new grad.
It is starting to make me very cynical about the whole job hunting process
altogether. It's not so bad since I still have my job in my old city, so
it is not like we are living on Ramen noodles. However, it would be nice
to join my wife in NJ once she starts her practice up!

Thanks for letting me vent. If anyone has similar experiences or advice,
I would love to hear from you!

Re: Job Hunting Woes

I visit a couple online forums and this is a universal theme. I've been
working at my current client on a month-to-month basis since last summer
and I consider myself extremely fortunate.

Yes, many of those job ads are bogus. Sometimes it's the H1B cover-up thing.
Other times it's headhunters and job brokerages that just want to load up
their databases with lots of names so if they get a lead on a job, they can
pull up 20 resumes to fax to the client. And although I've never experienced
this myself, I understand some of the brokerages collect resumes and job
references solely for the purpose of calling your references to see if they're
hiring anyone.

Yes, any job ad returns a couple hundred resumes so the company has to wade
thru a LOT of stuff to find your resume.

Now, given the horrible state of the job market, you have to look at things
you can do to improve your chances. It sounds like you've already figured
out some of this - - personal contacts (not harassing! just touching base)
are important. So are resumes tailored to appeal to the particular position.
Often the imbeciles in HR have no idea how technologies relate to each other
and can only match up acronyms so assume NOTHING. I'm not a very good source
of resume advice other than to say you need to keep it short, succinct, and
hit the hotbuttons for whatever job you're applying for. You can tell them
your life history in the interview if you get one.

Online job boards and newspaper ads are legitimate places to search but they
should not make up more than, say, 30% of your job-searching time. This is
bad news to us techies because most of us would much rather apply online
than call/meet with people in person (myself included!) Also, as people
say, searching for a job is a full-time job. And real-live-people-networking
is still the most effective means of finding employment.

Now I have no idea what "northern New Jersey" is like. If it's very rural
(meaning not a lot of companies to work for) maybe none of this will help.

I can imagine it's terribly demoralizing to be in your position but believe
me, you have plenty of company. I believe things will get better but not
as fast as any of us would like.

Re: Job Hunting Woes

The best way to find a job is still the good old "networking". Your friend
in a propective company will know exactly who to submit the resume and
follow up for you. There is no better way!

Forget about the newspapers. By the time you saw the ads, the HR department
has already been flooded with mountains of letters. Also, I have seen that
many many times, that companies have candidates in mind but put out the ads
as formality. Some companies even go out of the way to put their ads during
the weekdays so that the exposure is minimal. So don't waste your time on
newspapers.

As of the job web sites, they are better than newspapers. But they are
flooded with recruiters trying to capitalize on your job search. Be very
careful to screen the recruiters. Most of them will not do anything for
you, just wasting your time. But hooking up a few good ones will get you
some interviews.

Last but not least, go over your resume again. Make sure it is brief and
to-the-point. Nobody has time to read an *essay* if you know what I mean.
And make sure you hit all the buzz words that will catch the eyes of the
recruiters/hiring managers.

Hope this helps, and good luck.

simon.

"Job Seeker in NJ" <job_seeker@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3c969768$1@10.1.10.29...
>
> In a few months, I will be moving to the Northern NJ area because my wife
> (a vet) is starting up a practice in that area. Because of this upcoming
> move, I am looking to start a new job in that area. However, thus far my
> job search has been fruitless to say the least. I have a MS in Computer
> Science and 8 years of experience doing software development in a variety
> of relevant, in-demand languages, so I definitely I am definitely not one
> of the legions of "new grads" with paper credentials and no real-world
skills.
> I've been around the block a few times as they say.
>
> The most frustrating thing is that I see postings for jobs in the
newpapers
> and on the web (hotjobs, monster, dice, etc) advertising for positions
that
> I _know_ I would be perfect for. I have the skills, experience, and
education
> these people seem to want, yet it seems like my resume ane cover letter is
> getting lost in the shuffle.
>
> I have a couple of theories:
>
> - With the job market tight, everybody and their mother is sending resumes
> to every open position. Because of this flood of resumes, the good ones
> get lost in among all of the marginal ones.
>
> - Companies are advertising for positions that they don't want to fill.
> I know of at least one company that puts ads in the paper for jobs that
they
> don't intend to fill because they have to satisfy H1-B visa requirements.
> I would like to think that this wouldn't be a widespread trend, but given
> the lack of corporate ethics these days I wouldn't be too surprised.
>
> - Perhaps I'm not marketting myself well enough. I started out by sending
> the same stock resume and cover letter to everyone. Now I am custom
writing
> each cover letter based upon the description of the position. Still, this
> doesn't seem to help.
>
> - I do not usually follow up with a phone call. Now I know there are
those
> that like to always follow up, but I haven't been doing this because I
don't
> want to spam anyone. I figure that these people have enough to do without
> me bugging them by begging them for an interview. Besides, my resume and
> cover letter has always been enough to get a response. However, I am
thinking
> of changing this strategy.
>
> - I am not as perfect as I think I am. With all of the layoffs, perhaps
> I am now competing with people with twice my experience and I am just not
> making the first cut.
>
> The most frustrating thing is that this is really the first time I have
had
> this type of trouble getting a job (not that I've been job-hopping or
anything
> like that). When I graduated from school in '93, the economy was just as
> bad as it is now, but I was still able to get some "bites" as a new grad.
> It is starting to make me very cynical about the whole job hunting
process
> altogether. It's not so bad since I still have my job in my old city, so
> it is not like we are living on Ramen noodles. However, it would be nice
> to join my wife in NJ once she starts her practice up!
>
> Thanks for letting me vent. If anyone has similar experiences or advice,
> I would love to hear from you!
>
> Job Seeker in NJ
>

Re: Job Hunting Woes

Thanks for your advice and encouragement. I guess the bottom line is that
I have to keep slogging and hopefully the market will start to thaw a bit.

I agree with you about phantom job postings from headhunters. I sent one
resume to a job that looked decent. I got called back by a headhunter and
he told me straight up that he was just fishing for resumes. Of course,
he didn't have any opportunities for me! In retrospect, I should have known
that he was a headhunter because the ad was very vague. Now that I'm wise
to these tricks, I can spot headhunter ads a mile away!

As I mentioned, I am still employed at my old job, so I'm not hurting financially
like other people who are in the market. Nevertheless, it is good to vent
every once in a awhile!

PS: Northern NJ (at least where I will be) is very close to NYC so it definitely
isn't rural. After 9/11, a lot of companies who were dislocated have moved
some or all of their operations in NJ.

Re: Job Hunting Woes

"simon" <substring0NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
>The best way to find a job is still the good old "networking". Your friend
>in a propective company will know exactly who to submit the resume and
>follow up for you. There is no better way!
>

I am definitely "working the network". So far I haven't gotten any good
leads but I am definitely trying!
>Forget about the newspapers. By the time you saw the ads, the HR department
>has already been flooded with mountains of letters. Also, I have seen that
>many many times, that companies have candidates in mind but put out the
ads
>as formality. Some companies even go out of the way to put their ads during
>the weekdays so that the exposure is minimal. So don't waste your time
on
>newspapers.
>

Actually, 2 of the 4 full time jobs that I've held have come out of newpaper
ads, so they aren't all bad. Of course, that was during better times!

>As of the job web sites, they are better than newspapers. But they are
>flooded with recruiters trying to capitalize on your job search. Be very
>careful to screen the recruiters. Most of them will not do anything for
>you, just wasting your time. But hooking up a few good ones will get you
>some interviews.
>

That's what I'm starting to figure out. I have a feeling that I am just
one of thousands of people applying to anything and everything that moves!

>Last but not least, go over your resume again. Make sure it is brief and
>to-the-point. Nobody has time to read an *essay* if you know what I mean.
>And make sure you hit all the buzz words that will catch the eyes of the
>recruiters/hiring managers.
>

What length would you suggest? When I came out of college, I was told that
I should keep my resume to 1 page max. Now that I have some work experience
under my belt, I've pushed it up to 2 pages. However, I am starting to think
that I should go back to using a one page resume. Sure it will be less detailed,
but like you said, nobody likes to read _War and Peace_ when just the Cliff's
Notes will suffice!

PS: I agree with what you said about C++. I am a long time C and C++ coder
so I am biased, but with those languages under your belt, you can pick up
just about anything!

Re: Job Hunting Woes

"Job Seeker in NJ" <job_seeker@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3c98002b$1@10.1.10.29...
<snip>
> >Last but not least, go over your resume again. Make sure it is brief and
> >to-the-point. Nobody has time to read an *essay* if you know what I
mean.
> >And make sure you hit all the buzz words that will catch the eyes of the
> >recruiters/hiring managers.
> >
>
> What length would you suggest? When I came out of college, I was told
that
> I should keep my resume to 1 page max. Now that I have some work
experience
> under my belt, I've pushed it up to 2 pages. However, I am starting to
think
> that I should go back to using a one page resume. Sure it will be less
detailed,
> but like you said, nobody likes to read _War and Peace_ when just the
Cliff's
> Notes will suffice!
>
Keep in mind that those so called career advisors may not know any more than
you and me. IMHO, most of these things are simply common sense. After a
few years of working experience, there is no way you can put everything into
one page.... well, unless you are using font size 6 and attach a magnifying
glass with your resume, haha.

Two pages are definitely okay. I like to itemize my skillset and experience
in bullet points instead of long wordy paragraphs. That is clean and easy
to read, and it is the cardinal rule of writing a resume.

Resume should serve no more than catching the attention and interest of the
recruiters/hiring managers. If they want to know more about you, they will
set up an interview.

By the way, economy is coming around. Mortgage interest rate has risen
above 7%. Companies will soon relax the hiring freeze. But then of course
they won't be paying those outrageous salaries and big sign-up bonus
anymore. =)

Keep you head up and keep searching. The "right" company will "find" you.
=)

Re: Job Hunting Woes

"simon" <substring0NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Resume should serve no more than catching the attention and interest of
the recruiters/hiring managers. If they want to know more about you, they
will set up an interview.<<

To pick up on Simon's point, the average recruiter/broker/HR rep/manager
spends all of ELEVEN SECONDS on each resume when making the first cut. So
if your hotbutton skills for this particular job don't jump out in that 11
seconds, your resume falls into oblivion.

A common technique is to have bulletized areas near the top of the first
page:

You can re-arrange this to highlight whatever type of skill you're pushing
but you want this info right up front - - after the job objective and BEFORE
your college degrees and the details about your past employers.

And I wasn't kidding when I said ASSUME NOTHING. That means even though
HTML is a given in any web development job, don't leave it off because some
idiot will exclude you thinking you don't have this really complex skill
that's on the job description he's trying to fill.

Re: Job Hunting Woes

The resume tips and educational advises sound great when the economy is
strong, but
when we have a severe recession and companies tighten their IT spending, I'm
not sure whether the qualified person will be the one who gets the job. The
sad part about the job hunting process is that, despite the terrorist attack
and the slump in IT market, the burden of proofs fall on the applicant when
the interviewer wants to know why the job candidate was unemployed for such
a long time (or why he/she had so many jobs prior to the lay-off)...

It is ironic that not long ago the US media claims that there is a shortage
of US programmers! Having a technical know-how provides you with only the
first 50% of getting the interview or the job. To keep that job and to
survive that corporate culture, the other 50% depends on your ability to
deal with politics and difficult people.

My .02 cents,

Peter

"Elena" <egermano@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3c98b57e$1@10.1.10.29...
>
> "simon" <substring0NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>Resume should serve no more than catching the attention and interest of
> the recruiters/hiring managers. If they want to know more about you, they
> will set up an interview.<<
>
> To pick up on Simon's point, the average recruiter/broker/HR rep/manager
> spends all of ELEVEN SECONDS on each resume when making the first cut. So
> if your hotbutton skills for this particular job don't jump out in that 11
> seconds, your resume falls into oblivion.
>
> A common technique is to have bulletized areas near the top of the first
> page:
>
> TECHNICAL SKILLS:
> Databases: SQL Server, DB2, Oracle, Access
>
> Hardware: Intel-based servers, Sun Server xxx, whatever,
>
> Languages: Visual Basic, ASP, XML, XSL, HTML, JavaScript, CSS,
> Transact-SQL, PL/SQL, C
>
> Operating Systems: NT Server 4.0, Win 9x/NT Workstation 4.0,
> XP Professional, HP-UX Unix, Free BSD, xxx
>
> Software: Visual Studio 6, Dreamweaver, xxxxx
>
> You can re-arrange this to highlight whatever type of skill you're pushing
> but you want this info right up front - - after the job objective and
BEFORE
> your college degrees and the details about your past employers.
>
> And I wasn't kidding when I said ASSUME NOTHING. That means even though
> HTML is a given in any web development job, don't leave it off because
some
> idiot will exclude you thinking you don't have this really complex skill
> that's on the job description he's trying to fill.
>
> Elena
>
>

Re: Job Hunting Woes

"********" <ple@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message news:3c98ba15$1@10.1.10.29...
<snip>... the burden of proofs fall on the applicant when
> the interviewer wants to know why the job candidate was unemployed for
such
> a long time (or why he/she had so many jobs prior to the lay-off)...
>
Companies can lay you off within a heart beat, but most of them still demand
loyalty and do not like job-hoppers. That is reality and there is nothing
you can do about it.
> It is ironic that not long ago the US media claims that there is a
shortage
> of US programmers!
>
If we trust everything the media feeds us, we will be in deep trouble.
> Having a technical know-how provides you with only the
> first 50% of getting the interview or the job. To keep that job and to
> survive that corporate culture, the other 50% depends on your ability to
> deal with politics and difficult people.
>
This calls LIFE. That's why those who can deal with politics and people get
the promotion and the big bucks. And those who cannot remain in the
programmer dungeon <g>.

Re: Job Hunting Woes

I beg to differ on the last sentence. I know some talented designers and
architects who would rather quit their job than to stifle their creative
mindset in a politics environment. Of course, life ain't fair for those of
us who refuse to play the game and therefore some of us have to pay the
price.

"simon" <substring0NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3c98eae1$1@10.1.10.29...
> "********" <ple@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message news:3c98ba15$1@10.1.10.29...
> <snip>... the burden of proofs fall on the applicant when
> > the interviewer wants to know why the job candidate was unemployed for
> such
> > a long time (or why he/she had so many jobs prior to the lay-off)...
> >
> Companies can lay you off within a heart beat, but most of them still
demand
> loyalty and do not like job-hoppers. That is reality and there is nothing
> you can do about it.
>
> > It is ironic that not long ago the US media claims that there is a
> shortage
> > of US programmers!
> >
> If we trust everything the media feeds us, we will be in deep trouble.
>
> > Having a technical know-how provides you with only the
> > first 50% of getting the interview or the job. To keep that job and to
> > survive that corporate culture, the other 50% depends on your ability to
> > deal with politics and difficult people.
> >
> This calls LIFE. That's why those who can deal with politics and people
get
> the promotion and the big bucks. And those who cannot remain in the
> programmer dungeon <g>.
>
> simon.
>
>

Re: Job Hunting Woes

One reason I continue to work for myself. Not the reason I started to though.

Mark

"********" <ple@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>I beg to differ on the last sentence. I know some talented designers and
>architects who would rather quit their job than to stifle their creative
>mindset in a politics environment. Of course, life ain't fair for those
of
>us who refuse to play the game and therefore some of us have to pay the
>price.
>
>
>"simon" <substring0NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3c98eae1$1@10.1.10.29...
>> "********" <ple@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message news:3c98ba15$1@10.1.10.29...
>> <snip>... the burden of proofs fall on the applicant when
>> > the interviewer wants to know why the job candidate was unemployed for
>> such
>> > a long time (or why he/she had so many jobs prior to the lay-off)...
>> >
>> Companies can lay you off within a heart beat, but most of them still
>demand
>> loyalty and do not like job-hoppers. That is reality and there is nothing
>> you can do about it.
>>
>> > It is ironic that not long ago the US media claims that there is a
>> shortage
>> > of US programmers!
>> >
>> If we trust everything the media feeds us, we will be in deep trouble.
>>
>> > Having a technical know-how provides you with only the
>> > first 50% of getting the interview or the job. To keep that job and
to
>> > survive that corporate culture, the other 50% depends on your ability
to
>> > deal with politics and difficult people.
>> >
>> This calls LIFE. That's why those who can deal with politics and people
>get
>> the promotion and the big bucks. And those who cannot remain in the
>> programmer dungeon <g>.
>>
>> simon.
>>
>>
>
>

Re: Job Hunting Woes

"simon" <substring0NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Two pages are definitely okay. I like to itemize my skillset and experience
>in bullet points instead of long wordy paragraphs. That is clean and easy
>to read, and it is the cardinal rule of writing a resume.
>
>Resume should serve no more than catching the attention and interest of
the
>recruiters/hiring managers. If they want to know more about you, they will
>set up an interview.
>

Definitely good advice! I try to list my experience in "bullet point" form
so that you don't have to slog through paragraphs and paragraphs.
>By the way, economy is coming around. Mortgage interest rate has risen
>above 7%. Companies will soon relax the hiring freeze. But then of course
>they won't be paying those outrageous salaries and big sign-up bonus
>anymore. =)
>

Selfishly, I hope that interest rates don't rise too much more because we
are looking to buy a house in the next few months!

>Keep you head up and keep searching. The "right" company will "find" you.
>=)

Re: Job Hunting Woes

"********" <ple@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>The resume tips and educational advises sound great when the economy is
>strong, but
>when we have a severe recession and companies tighten their IT spending,
I'm
>not sure whether the qualified person will be the one who gets the job.

I am not sure that I am following your logic here. If anything, I think
the tight labor market means that companies can't just hire any old bum of
the street to be a "web developer"

The
>sad part about the job hunting process is that, despite the terrorist attack
>and the slump in IT market, the burden of proofs fall on the applicant when
>the interviewer wants to know why the job candidate was unemployed for such
>a long time (or why he/she had so many jobs prior to the lay-off)...
>

I don't agree with you there. Companies have every right to ask questions
of job candidates. Just like you as a candidate have every right to ask
questions of your prospective employer. Sure it isn't fair. Sure it would
be "nice" if employers just hired people on their good looks, if they did
we'd have a lot of failed companies. I think asking about what you did when
you weren't employed or why you switched jobs so frequently is a perfectly
acceptable question to ask. If you have a good accounting of your time then
what's the big deal?
>It is ironic that not long ago the US media claims that there is a shortage
>of US programmers! Having a technical know-how provides you with only the
>first 50% of getting the interview or the job. To keep that job and to
>survive that corporate culture, the other 50% depends on your ability to
>deal with politics and difficult people.

I agree about there not being a shortage of programmers. I think part of
the problem is that the people doing the hiring often overvalue experience
with specific technologies and they undervalue general software and technical
experience. They assume that if you are development using Widget 2.0 that
only people who have experience with Widget 2.0 need apply. From my personal
experience, you get more productivity out of a good programmer who may not
know your specific platform. The good programmer will end up being more
productive in the long run, no matter what their background.

As far as politics and difficult people go, that's life for you. Unless
you are a hermit, life is about dealing with people. I used to think the
way you do. I used to think that politics and such was bullsh*t, and I did
my best to steer clear of it. However, I found that you can attract more
bees with honey than with vinegar. If you try to make people's jobs easier,
they'll make your job easier.

Re: Job Hunting Woes

"Job Seeker in NJ" <job_seeker@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3c992449$1@10.1.10.29...
>
> "********" <ple@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> >The resume tips and educational advises sound great when the economy is
> >strong, but
> >when we have a severe recession and companies tighten their IT spending,
> I'm
> >not sure whether the qualified person will be the one who gets the job.
>
>
> I am not sure that I am following your logic here. If anything, I think
> the tight labor market means that companies can't just hire any old bum of
> the street to be a "web developer"

Perhaps if you get used to thinking outside of the box, you'll probably
understand my logic :-)
What I meant is companies have taken advantage of the large pool of
unemployed professionals in this IT downturn. The hiring managers are
getting very picky as far as the "perfect" candidates are concerned. It
used to be the case that if you satisfied 9 out of 10 requirements in the
list of skillsets, you'd get the job. Not any more. All I 'm saying is
while you may be qualified to have this same job three years ago under
normal circumstances, it is a much tougher sell for you to be hired now
(Even though you may think you can do the job without any problems).
>
> The
> >sad part about the job hunting process is that, despite the terrorist
attack
> >and the slump in IT market, the burden of proofs fall on the applicant
when
> >the interviewer wants to know why the job candidate was unemployed for
such
> >a long time (or why he/she had so many jobs prior to the lay-off)...
> >
>
> I don't agree with you there. Companies have every right to ask questions
> of job candidates. Just like you as a candidate have every right to ask
> questions of your prospective employer. Sure it isn't fair. Sure it
would
> be "nice" if employers just hired people on their good looks, if they did
> we'd have a lot of failed companies. I think asking about what you did
when
> you weren't employed or why you switched jobs so frequently is a perfectly
> acceptable question to ask. If you have a good accounting of your time
then
> what's the big deal?

Again, it's ok for employers to ask questions about what you did when you
were unemployed or why you switched jobs frequently, but if the interviewers
go to the extreme by overlooking your qualifications and how you can make a
contribution to the firm FROM THIS POINT FORWARD then it'll be a loss for
that company.
> >It is ironic that not long ago the US media claims that there is a
shortage
> >of US programmers! Having a technical know-how provides you with only
the
> >first 50% of getting the interview or the job. To keep that job and to
> >survive that corporate culture, the other 50% depends on your ability to
> >deal with politics and difficult people.
>
> I agree about there not being a shortage of programmers. I think part of
> the problem is that the people doing the hiring often overvalue experience
> with specific technologies and they undervalue general software and
technical
> experience. They assume that if you are development using Widget 2.0 that
> only people who have experience with Widget 2.0 need apply. From my
personal
> experience, you get more productivity out of a good programmer who may not
> know your specific platform. The good programmer will end up being more
> productive in the long run, no matter what their background.
>
> As far as politics and difficult people go, that's life for you. Unless
> you are a hermit, life is about dealing with people. I used to think the
> way you do. I used to think that politics and such was bullsh*t, and I
did
> my best to steer clear of it. However, I found that you can attract more
> bees with honey than with vinegar. If you try to make people's jobs
easier,
> they'll make your job easier.

Life is certainly about dealing with people; however, I have worked in an
environment (a well-known brokerage firm in NYC) where someone tests his
programming scripts on production server without any testings, and when I
pinpointed the problems caused by this scenario, a lot of fingerpointings
took place as a result. I'm not a hermit like you implied because I know
when somebody treats me with deceptions and twisted facts. Making someone's
job easier does not mean we have to stoop ourselves to the level of
dishonesty.

Re: Job Hunting Woes

Your letter, and the responses, sound so familiar. I've been in the workforce
since 1980 and have been laid off three times. It seemed like every time
the economy went into recession, I got laid off. (This is not a bad recession,
by the way. I'm still working! It doesn't compare at all to 1982.)

Unless you're in a hot field, job hunting is always discouraging. You don't
know when it will end, and every effort seems to reward you with rejection
and a bruised ego. You can really come to hate HR departments, upper management,
and the whole hiring process. But it eventually does end. I've never failed
to find a job. Quite often when the dam does break, you'll get multiple
offers! (This has happened to me a lot. I'll go for months getting nothing
but form rejection letters and suddenly get two interviews and offers within
the space of two weeks. Another weird thing is I've often gotten calls from
resumes I sent out many months ago, and after I've accepted a new position
and reported to work. This is life. Good things can happen too.

Networking is the very best way to find a job, and sometimes it is the only
way. Youíll get a better job than by applying to ads, and it will be more
secure.

One resource you might be overlooking is you wife. She has a veterinary
practice. She meets lots of people, some of whom might work for local IT
companies, be hiring managers at local IT companies, or know someone who
works for a local IT company. She could quietly put out the word for you.
While she probably isnít going to come right out and ask her customers if
they know of a job for her husband, she can make small talk such as asking
them what they do and where they work. Most people enjoy talking about themselves.
And if one of them happens to work for a local IT company, she can reply,
ďOh, my husband is a programmer. Heís working in ______, NJ, but heís going
to move here when he finds a job.Ē It would be unusual if the person didnít
offer to help. People like to help; it makes them feel good.

Something else you might try is to send a letter to the president of the
local Chamber of Commerce. Explain that your wife has begun a veterinary
practice there and you are looking for a job in order to join her. Could
he refer you to any local IT companies that might be hiring? It would not
be inappropriate to include a resume. This is a perfectly legitimate request.
C of Cís are in the business of promoting business, and attracting highly
qualified workers to the area is good for business. A reference from a source
like this is several orders of magnitude better than anything you are going
to pick up in the classifieds.

One final piece of advice: donít take a job just because itís the only one
you can get in the area. Make sure the company you are going to work for
is a good one. Since you are still employed, you donít have to take just
anything that comes along. Thereís a lot of power in saying ďnoĒ. Donít
let a company take advantage of you because they know you want to move to
the area. Regardless of what they say, they're not going to hire you out
of charity, and they should expect to pay for what they get. How you hire
in sets the tone for your entire tenure at a company, and you don't want
start out being exploited. If you do, it won't get any better.

Good luck!

"Job Seeker in NJ" <job_seeker@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>In a few months, I will be moving to the Northern NJ area because my wife
>(a vet) is starting up a practice in that area. Because of this upcoming
>move, I am looking to start a new job in that area. However, thus far my
>job search has been fruitless to say the least. I have a MS in Computer
>Science and 8 years of experience doing software development in a variety
>of relevant, in-demand languages, so I definitely I am definitely not one
>of the legions of "new grads" with paper credentials and no real-world skills.
> I've been around the block a few times as they say.
>
>The most frustrating thing is that I see postings for jobs in the newpapers
>and on the web (hotjobs, monster, dice, etc) advertising for positions that
>I _know_ I would be perfect for. I have the skills, experience, and education
>these people seem to want, yet it seems like my resume ane cover letter
is
>getting lost in the shuffle.
>
>I have a couple of theories:
>
>- With the job market tight, everybody and their mother is sending resumes
>to every open position. Because of this flood of resumes, the good ones
>get lost in among all of the marginal ones.
>
>- Companies are advertising for positions that they don't want to fill.
>I know of at least one company that puts ads in the paper for jobs that
they
>don't intend to fill because they have to satisfy H1-B visa requirements.
> I would like to think that this wouldn't be a widespread trend, but given
>the lack of corporate ethics these days I wouldn't be too surprised.
>
>- Perhaps I'm not marketting myself well enough. I started out by sending
>the same stock resume and cover letter to everyone. Now I am custom writing
>each cover letter based upon the description of the position. Still, this
>doesn't seem to help.
>
>- I do not usually follow up with a phone call. Now I know there are those
>that like to always follow up, but I haven't been doing this because I don't
>want to spam anyone. I figure that these people have enough to do without
>me bugging them by begging them for an interview. Besides, my resume and
>cover letter has always been enough to get a response. However, I am thinking
>of changing this strategy.
>
>- I am not as perfect as I think I am. With all of the layoffs, perhaps
>I am now competing with people with twice my experience and I am just not
>making the first cut.
>
>The most frustrating thing is that this is really the first time I have
had
>this type of trouble getting a job (not that I've been job-hopping or anything
>like that). When I graduated from school in '93, the economy was just as
>bad as it is now, but I was still able to get some "bites" as a new grad.
> It is starting to make me very cynical about the whole job hunting process
>altogether. It's not so bad since I still have my job in my old city, so
>it is not like we are living on Ramen noodles. However, it would be nice
>to join my wife in NJ once she starts her practice up!
>
>Thanks for letting me vent. If anyone has similar experiences or advice,
>I would love to hear from you!
>
>Job Seeker in NJ
>