On 12/20/05, Sander Tekelenburg <tekelenb at euronet.nl> wrote:
> Thus again it is an issue of Microsoft's relative monopoly in the browser
> world. But I don't see many people arguing to declare CSS dead just because
> IE's CSS support sucks. So why should we look that way at LINK?
It may just be me, but I perceive a great deal of difference between
"IE supports CSS poorly" and "IE doesn't support CSS at all", only the
latter of which seems relevant in the context of the `link` element.
Aankhen