Technology and Bill of Rights

Amendment IV - Seizures, Searches, and Warrants

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particular describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Tami has become extremely concerned with the advancement of technology and how people, organizations and governments can violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. Today, the prosecution of these offenses seems impossible. Advanced surveillance and monitoring technologies most often go undetected, because an average person has minimal IT knowledge and law enforcement officials lack the expertise to collect, investigate and prosecute these crimes.

Amendment Fourteen Due Process and Equal Protection Clause reads “nor shall and State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law. Understanding citizens have no defense against unethical government officials; Americans, similarly have no protection from criminals or foreign groups that utilize advanced surveillance technologies.

Tami remains appalled at the Patriot Act and the Presidential Surveillance Programs; they allow the Government to govern with absolute power, authority, and immunity. In May 2011, Republicans and Democrats agreed to a four-year extension of the Patriot Act: which includes lone wolf surveillance; wiretaps; and access to library, business, and personal records without warrants. Americans have been told these programs were for terrorist; however, there have been numerous accounts of Americans being targeted without any probable cause.

Tami would alter or stop any unconstitutional programs, which includes: Patriot Act; Presidents Surveillance Program; eGuardian, a program for collecting Suspicious Activity; and CRUSH, I-Clear and CompStat ﻿predictive analytics programs﻿ that anticipate when a person will commit a crime. In addition, to these known programs, she will also evaluate the unknown programs, including any that might target American troops and foreigners. Posted on 9/5/11

Amendment VI and VII – Speedy and Public Trial by Jury

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,

Tami has a growing concern that the American society has collectively decided to encroach upon a person’s right to have an impartial jury. Recent events have shown that the media can use their power to influence a jury pool and they can shape public opinion even before evidence has been presented in a court of law.

During the recent Casey Anthony case, Tami witnessed a dangerous movement where TV experts decided guilt and now that Anthony’s jury has decided within 48 hours that she was innocence, Americans still believe she was guilty. Therefore, Tami questions why the media assumes it has the right to influence public opinion with circumstantial evidence and why Americans believe this behavior should be a legitimate form of justice. Tami asks, because she wonders, was this mother challenged by life; was she guilty of manslaughter; was the death an accident; was the women a cold blooded murder; was the women scared to admit an accident; was the accident caused by a drug dealer; or was the a family member involved? If this case becomes the precedent for determining guilt, Americans should be concern.

Another example of interfering with a potential jury pool was the case of Jared Loughner; here Government officials, media, and Americans determined absolute guilt, even though there were published reports that he could be a victim of mind control technologies. Many Americans may not be aware or knowledgeable about the technologies which control and manipulate a person’s brain and body, however, they exist, just as cancer, pace makers and hypnosis exists. Tami, cannot imagine why Government officials would risk violating this man’s right to an impartial jury?

Lastly as tax payers we should be concerned with a person right to a speedy trial, we now have those charged with crimes spending two years in prison before a case even goes to trial, and in civil matters continuations and postponements have become the norm. The legal system was instituted to protect victims and those guilty. It was a system defined under the assumption that a person was innocent until they were proven guilty, thus Tami will look at measures that can expedite trials.

Tami will not support any ﻿science﻿ or technology that utilizes a person ﻿brain and body for the purpose of listening to their private thoughts, tracking their personal whereabouts, or to coerce them into providing evidence to gain a conviction. Furthermore, I will ban any technologies that control or manipulate a person’s thoughts or body. Disc 2, Justice Brennan and my videos on utube.Command Center and Labor Camps

Collection of Eleven Videos which demonstrate that I am a victim of brain and body science defined as torture by United States 2340-2340A and United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Recognizing time is important here is all you need; recognizing I have no understanding of any foreign languages.

Why Legal Profession hinders all efforts to Stop Science - Souters Firm old Firm and this recent from Gleason Law Firm - Imagine General Tami no issues pull w-2 from 1998-2004 Letter to Tami on Representation