Observations from top football people all agree on these five components in building a dynasty. Jack BechtaJANUARY 03, 2013, 01:30 PM EST

A top NFL executive formally of the Patriots said something very humbling to me on his way to an interview with another team; “the only reason I’m getting this interview is because Tom Brady makes us all look good”. I thought the comment to be spot on. As coaches and front office execs are crisscrossing the country right now interviewing for top jobs, I chatted with some current and former top football people about the traits needed to build a multiple Super Bowl winning dynasty. These are the five building blocks

1) A special QB: So what is “special”? Special means that the QB can make plays that other QB’s can’t. They can win games on their own. They are like an extra coach on the field. You want the ball in their hands on the final series of a game when your team is behind. They possess traits that can’t be coached. They help to build chemistry in the locker room. They are uniquely durable. Peyton Manning is the model for “special” because he possesses multiple traits. Brady, Eli, Brees, Roethlisberger, and Rodgers are all special. It looks like Luck, RGIII, Keapernick, and Wilson have a chance to develop into special breeds as well. A special QB can hide a lot of a team’s deficiencies in other areas. A special QB makes his line better by getting rid of the football. He makes his receivers better by giving them chances to make plays. He takes pressure off the coaches by making the right adjustments at the line of scrimmage. Unfortunately, there most likely will never be 32 of them. Sure you can still win an occasional super bowl with a good QB but just take stock in the last 25 super bowl winners, as the vast majority were won by “special QB’s”.

The Bears signed Jay Cutler in 2009 because he possesses special traits that can’t be manufactured or coached. Like him or not, he can be a special QB based on release and arm strength alone. However, they don’t grow on trees so a team may have to take risk and some may even take some time to develop (Brees is a good example). What Brees lacks in physical traits he makes up for in intangibles. You want a dynasty; you have to have a special QB.

2) Stability at the top: The Steelers, Ravens, Falcons, Saints, Patriots, Giants, and Packers have it. These teams have philosophies, systems, and leaders that are strong and proven. I love sending young players to these teams because I know they will be developed. These teams have plans for every one on their roster and practice squads. The owners also have limited roles and trust the football people to do their jobs. It looks like the Texans, Niners, Seahawks, Redskins, Colts, Vikings and a few other teams are developing stability. When a team has a stable environment there is great communication up and down the chain of command from the owner to the equipment manager. The GM and head coach talk often and keep chemistry between coaches and the personnel department. Chemistry in an NFL front office is more elusive than people realize.

3) An owner committed to winning and not just profits: Like in most businesses winning starts at the top. When owners are focused on just the bottom line, the jobs of the football people are compromised. Some owners want to run the show and let their ego and or insecurities get in the way of making decisions. Others will handcuff the GM from spending their cap maximum.

4) A great scouting department, system and philosophy: Some of the best teams in the NFL have the least turnover in their scouting departments. A team's scouting department is their R&D and helps to keep the pipeline full of talent just like great pharmaceutical companies do with new drugs. The Polians weren’t fired because they were bad at their job. The Colts are winning with a lot of their picks and player acquisitions. They were most likely fired because they didn’t have an answer at the backup QB position when Peyton went down. A dynasty will have an answer for every position on the field. GM John Schneider in Seattle is a great scout. Always has been and always will be. He fell in love with Russell Wilson and cross checked what he saw with his coaches and area scouts to make sure they all agreed they saw the same thing. That one pick has helped to change the direction of a franchise.

5) Coaches who develop young players: With the cap limiting teams from stock piling all the talent, they have to develop young players. Late round picks and undrafted free agents can take years to develop. Look at the Steelers S Ryan Clark and LB James Harrison. They were young players who struggled early in their careers but with patience developed into pro bowl caliber players. When the Bucs drafted S John Lynch in 1993, the Bucs almost cut him as a rookie. The Coaches pleaded with GM Rich McKay for a chance to work with him. Rich gave the coaches a chance and John developed into a nine time pro bowl player. Jim Harbaugh’s staff is full of good teachers and it shows. Coaching is teaching and with the fast moving carousel that is NFL coaching, a lot of the teaching part gets lost. If your team is not developing the bottom of the roster they will get exposed when injuries pile up or when they lose their best players to free agency.

With the hiring of new coaches and or a GM, your team has a chance of laying the foundation for dynasty building. It takes a while to pour the foundation and get the cycle going. However, once it's in place, time becomes a friend and no longer the shadowy enemy.

4 and 5 are my largest concerns. Mostly 4. I think the others are pretty clear. Good QB. Stable Franchise. Patient coaches.

I can't tell if the scouting is great (we don't get a ton of meat in the midrounds) and can't tell if the "teaching" aspect of the coaching is great.

Obviously, if those are both solid, we'll have better drafts and those guys would learn more. I tend to think if 4 and 5 were "there" we'd have a good 2nd TE, 3rd and 4th WR, 2nd RB etc on offense so we wouldn't need to scramble for replacements after our guys leave. We'd be prepared for it. Similarly on D at DE, though I think most of the rest of the D picks have been pretty good.

4 and 5 are my largest concerns. Mostly 4. I think the others are pretty clear. Good QB. Stable Franchise. Patient coaches.

I can't tell if the scouting is great (we don't get a ton of meat in the midrounds) and can't tell if the "teaching" aspect of the coaching is great.

Obviously, if those are both solid, we'll have better drafts and those guys would learn more. I tend to think if 4 and 5 were "there" we'd have a good 2nd TE, 3rd and 4th WR, 2nd RB etc on offense so we wouldn't need to scramble for replacements after our guys leave. We'd be prepared for it. Similarly on D at DE, though I think most of the rest of the D picks have been pretty good.

I'm more on the side that #4 is the problem. #5 has definitely not been, as I don't think there are players on this roster that haven't been well taught, and it shows

Our problem has been signing productive FA's and drafting good players, not just role-players, after the 2nd round. I'm looking forward to this next offseason, a FULL DRAFT (+ a comp pick for Lofton?)!

He names nine QBS....slightly less than a third...as special with no mention of Matt. Hmmmmm It is nice to see the Falcs as a model org. There was a time that would have been laughable. Well, we would have been a model of what not to do.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum