Is anyone familiar with editing Wikipedia articles? We're trying to promote this project by adding external links. Is there a strategy so the links won't be removed again by other users?_________________Tome of Treasures - #1 resource for collectible role-playing games.

I think you are probably out of luck with Wiki. I recall that either on Dragonsfoot or The Acaeum that they attempted to correct some of the mistakes in the D&D listings and all the changes were removed. The changes were attempted a few times and each time they were removed.

I would not want to edit the article content. The only plan is to add a link from Wikipedia to this website. For example, the D&D article has a link to the Acaeum. So it would only be fair, if they let me add a link to this project, too. After all, we are good and we are a non-profit organization._________________Tome of Treasures - #1 resource for collectible role-playing games.

I think you are probably out of luck with Wiki. I recall that either on Dragonsfoot or The Acaeum that they attempted to correct some of the mistakes in the D&D listings and all the changes were removed. The changes were attempted a few times and each time they were removed.

Thats a bummer. Wikipedia looked too good to be true to me. I think the process of growth when recording in this hobby should occur under a platform of peer review. It is OK to be wrong and allow other's perspectives. That is the only way to get a true picture of how things are perceived by everyone. Otherwise, it is simply too easy to accidentally create history when all you wanted to do was record it._________________

I think the process of growth when recording in this hobby should occur under a platform of peer review.

I think this is where Wiki falls apart. The accept or reject of changes is not done by peer review but rather a moderator of the entry. I don't know what qualifications the moderator has or if he was just the first person to add the entry. I think what often happens is that he tweaks the entry to his liking and then blindly rejects any changes made by others. This is at least what it seems like to me.