EXCLUSIVE: Head Of Libertarian Party Named In Wikileaks List Of Secret US Intelligence Assets
Documents obtained through Wikileaks reveal that the current Chairman of the Libertarian Party has a relationship with the disgraced Stratfor intelligence group.
By John Vibes - March 17, 2018
In late 2011, hackers managed to crack into the databases of the global intelligence firm Stratfor and found a large volume of information that connected the firm with military contractors, government agencies, and confidential informants.
In the first months of 2012, these documents were made public by Wikileaks and included millions of emails, which showed Stratfor’s web of informers, pay-off structure, and other vital information about their covert operations.
Stratfor has picked up the nickname “Shadow CIA” and had relationships with Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Goldman Sachs and various government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines, and the US Defense Intelligence Agency.

I thought perhaps a thread carrying some of Peterson's notable observations might be helpful.
Here are two. Please contribute any you may think are particularly outstanding.
Russell Brand needs some schooling on how to conduct an interview, but this is nonetheless rather good.

Theres two words that come to mind about the whole fucking thing.
WOODS
and
THROW
They are NOT making things last longer. They are not releasing new models that fix existing problems. They are not trying to make things better. They are not interested in making things that break less. What they are trying to do is even worse. They are trying to design everything to become obsolete as soon as possible. They are trying to make things interconnected so they can sell data that is collected. They are trying to use everything as an advertising platform. They are trying to make things crappy and cheap so they break intentionally. They are trying to overcharge for cheaper and cheaper crap. They are not giving us useful features while overloading us with things we dont want.
This is not the way the future is supposed to be. The future is supposed to be actually better than what we had before, not worse. If we ever do make a star ship, we will be lucky if it makes it as far as the moon without needing to be hauled back in for a major repair. Their machines make us dumber than we ever have been. They try to recommend we buy products, not because we need them, but purely so they can make money on selling us shit we dont need and cant afford that is actually worse than the previous model. These self driving cars are merely surveillance tools that will be shut off at the first sign of revolution against the Corporation State.

Because, like weak, feckless, idiots, we walked away from and turned over the most most advanced society and technology the world has ever known, that took spending thousands of years and untold lives and fortunes for us to build, to be run now by people that barely have the skills to dress themselves each morning.
And we know what doing that will lead to.

A very annoying "feature".
Do what I did.
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=_SqvWpK9A5CUtQWDtr7ACg&q=disable+washer+lid+lock&oq=disable+washer+lid+lock&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i22i30k1l7.356.7545.0.11811.23.22.0.0.0.0.612.5565.2-2j6j2j4.14.0..2..0...1.1.64.psy-ab..9.14.5556...0j0i131k1j0i10k1.0.xpM7Qk9Wtlc

The point is, your bosses at the Fed create money out of electrons (devaluing our salaries and savings in the process), sell it to the government for bonds, charge interest on the bonds, charge exorbitant "costs" like five hundred million, hand out the other eighty billion to the banks which founded it to play with, get it back, and then you brag on them for finally giving that interest to the treasury.
The point is, I am not impressed by the Fed's "largesse", and I don't think anyone else is either.

This piece of shit won't let me type and post but in short, he is the fastest shooter, semi or otherwise and neither you, nor I, nor the next guy can shoot as fast as he (about 6 shots a second is what he shoots).
A bump fire stock allows for more than that, sustained.
He is more accurate, sure. But that wasn't your original metric.
You cannot shoot faster than a bump fire stock.

1) The media has no interest in Republicans nominating a candidate who can beat Obama. so, when they start hyping certain candidates, and tell you that others can't win, why do you believe them?

2) When other Republicans tell you to help nominate candidate X, because candidate Y "can't win," they are a) just parroting the media (and, yes, fellow Republicans, even your beloved Fox News is just the