Ineos

Ineos is a major chemicals company and a 50 per cent owner of the Grangemouth refinery in Scotland. It is part of the Ineos Group, a privately owned multinational chemicals company partly-headquartered in Rolle, Switzerland, with its registered office in Lyndhurst, United Kingdom.

British billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe is the founder, chairman and main shareholder, owning 60 per cent of the business. In 2018 he was ranked as Britain's wealthiest person in the annual Sunday Times Rich List after an extraordinary £15 billion rise in the value of Ineos from 2017. He was also knighted in the 2018 Queen's birthday honours list.

Once described as 'the biggest company you've never heard of', Ineos has more than 80 separate firms registered at the UK Companies House. It is the largest privately owned company in the UK. [1] In 2013 the Group's turnover was £43 billion; by 2017 this had risen to over £60 billion according to the Sunday Times Top Track 100.

Since 2014 Ineos has made major investments in shale gas exploration in the UK, buying up licences from BG Group and IGas Energy,. It is the UK's largest shale explorer in terms of exploration licences held. In July 2016 Ineos announced it intended to accelerate UK shale gas development by lodging as many as 30 planning applications to drill test fracking wells in the north of England in early 2017. It said it hoped to begin extracting gas within 18 months.

Director Tom Crotty said he believed that once drilling started, people would 'see [fracking] is not the Frankenstein monster they thought it was'. According to the Financial Times, 'he was confident that recent changes to rules allowing ministers to intervene if local councils delay granting permission would finally lead to Ineos drilling test wells'. Until permission was granted, he admitted it 'would continue to be “difficult” to convince critics'. [2]

In addition to its shale gas acquisitions, Ineos paid £1billion for the oil and gas business of Danish firm Dong Energy in May 2017, in a buying spree that also included £200m on a North Sea oil pipeline from BP, securing it a position as one of the top 10 biggest oil and gas producers in the region.

Background

INEOS Group is the fourth largest chemicals company in the world measured by revenues (after BASF, Dow Chemical and LyondellBasell). It employs over 15,000 employees at 51 manufacturing plants in 11 countries. In the UK:

INEOS Group own and run major plant at Runcorn (chlorine and caustic soda, used in many products – pharmaceuticals, synthetic fibres, bleach, water purification etc), Grangemouth in Scotland (two high energy ‘crackers’ to produce commodity chemicals used in fuels, solvents, nylon, packaging etc) and have plants based at Seal Sands, near and linked to the Wilton cluster, in the North East.

It co-owns Grangemouth with PetroChina. In July 2014 Ineos received a UK government loan guarantee to build Europe’s largest ethane storage tank at Grangemouth. The following month Ineos bought the rights to explore fracking for shale gas in a 127 square mile area around Grangemouth and the Firth of Forth.

In August 2015 Ineos Upstream was awarded a further three blocks (SK45, SK48 and SK58a) by the UK government in its first tranche of the 14th onshore licensing round.

In January 2018 Ineos announced it was creating six new oil and gas business units 'following the company’s extraordinary 2017 growth'. This has included buying up Dong Energy’s oil and gas business for $1.05bn in May 2017, and acquiring North Sea interests such as BP's Forties pipeline, making 'a top ten company in the North Sea and the biggest privately-owned exploration and production business operating in North West Europe'. As of January 2018, it had a daily production of around 95,000 boe (barrel of oil equivalent) from assets located in Norway, Denmark and the UK. [3]

The move into shale gas

Views

Back in 2013 INEOS published a lengthy article in its in-house magazine outlining its views on Europe's 'dithering' in the debate over shale gas exploration and production. It argued that action to facilitate shale gas production in the UK is imperative or chemical production in other regions, particularly the US, will gain such a competitive advantage that UK production will become uneconomic.

The firm plans to use imported US shale-derived feedstock in their chemical plants at Grangemouth. INEOS is one of the very few companies able to use shale gas as both a fuel and a feedstock.

INEOS has decided it cannot wait, and has struck a deal with the US to bring US raw materials to its European plants to maintain a competitive global Olefins & Polymers business. From 2015 INEOS Olefins & Polymers in Norway will begin taking ‘shipments of US-derived ethane – an essential ingredient necessary to produce ethylene. [4]

INEOS warned in a report to the House of Lords EU sub-committee 'that rising energy costs threaten to undermine the ability of manufacturers in the EU to compete on the world stage'. Chemical industries that rely heavily on fossil fuels to run its plants were 'particularly at risk' it said.

'We are acutely vulnerable to fluctuations in energy prices,' said Tom Crotty, INEOS' group director. 'We sell our products in fiercely competitive international markets and cannot pass on costs to our customers. But we cannot afford to operate in jurisdictions with uncompetitive energy prices.'

'If it doesn’t, production will be forced out of Europe to more competitive locations which will mean the loss of jobs, investment and tax revenue,' he said. Decarbonisation should not mean deindustrialisation, said Tom. 'The aim must be to connect industry to green energy supplies, not push industry away,” he added. He said energy-intensive industries were not ‘sunset industries’ standing in the way of environmental improvements. 'They are actually a vital source of raw materials and innovations required to make the green economy a reality,' he said.

Headquarters move to London

In December 2016, Ineos opened a new headquarters in London, UK, saying the move reflects its increased confidence in this country.
Jim Ratcliffe said they were 'planning to extract shale gas in the north of England and to grow the newly revitalised Grangemouth. We have immense confidence in Britain’s economic future – the current business climate makes siting our new headquarters in the UK an easy decision. INEOS will continue to grow both in the UK and worldwide. Britain is a good location to ensure both of these goals.'

Climate change and industry minister Nick Hurd welcomed the company's arrival with open arms, saying: 'This decision is another vote of confidence in the British economy and confirms the company’s commitment to further long-term investment and growth in this country.' [5]

Buying up shale exploration licences

2014

In August 2014 Ineos made its first move into onshore shale gas exploration in the UK, buying from BG Group a 51 per cent share of a shale licence covering 329 square km of the Midland Valley in Scotland, which includes the area around the Grangemouth refining and petrochemical complex. Dart Energy (now owned by IGas Energy) owned the other 49 per cent [6] however in March 2015 Ineos announced it was buying IGas's stake in the shale licence around the Grangemouth plant, thus giving it full ownership of the site.

2015

In March 2015 IGas agreed a deal with chemicals giant Ineos to sell it at least a 50% interest in seven of IGas’ shale gas licences in the North West along with the option to acquire a 20% interest in two further IGas licences in the East Midlands. The deal is worth £30 million in cash and a further £138 million commitment to fund a two-phase work programme to develop the sites. [7]

Ineos also pledged an extra £138m to help IGas expand its shale gas operations in the North West and East Midlands regions in England. [8]

2016

In September 2016 it was reported that Ineos was planning as many as 30 applications for fracking sites in the UK within the next year. 'Ineos estimates that it will be at least five years before any of its UK wells are actually producing shale gas'. [9]

2017

In March, Ineos bought up 15 shale licences from French energy company Engie for an undisclosed sum, consolidating its position as the UK's biggest shale gas explorer increasing by 10 per cent its rights to explore across 1.2m acres in the East Midlands, Yorkshire and Cheshire.

Meetings on shale gas with UK government ministers and officials

Stephen Lovegrove, DECC Permanent Secretary met with Jim Ratcliffe on 28 June 2013 at 3 Whitehall Place. The government's briefing notes described Ratcliffe as 'very well connected and has had a number of meetings with Ministers in various Departments and with Jeremy Heywood'. A section discussing INEOS' potential activities in shale gas was redacted from the briefing note. This meeting appeared to have been suggested to Lovegrove at a 'recent Lancastrian dinner' (held in April 2013). The focus of the meeting was 'primarily... about shale gas and the importance of supporting its development' in the UK. [10]

Attendee at UK energy minister's May 2018 shale gas roundtable

Energy minister Claire Perry hosted a roundtable with the fracking industry just hours before she gave evidence to a committee of MPs on the Conservative government's proposed changes to relax the rules on shale gas development in the UK.

Revolving door

In early 2017 Spinwatch revealed that a highly influential senior government official, Patrick Erwin had been seconded to lead Ineos' strategic push for shale in the UK since 2014.

One stark example of the fracking industry and government interests aligning is the case of Patrick Erwin, a former top civil servant in the department of energy and climate change (DECC) and the department for communities and local government (DCLG).

Three years ago, Erwin was seconded to work at Ineos, the petrochemical giant. His move coincided with the firm’s foray into fracking. As Ineos Upstream’s new commercial director, he was central to the development of its shale gas plans, helping it secure over one million acres in government licences to become Britain’s biggest onshore oil and gas operator.

Erwin was Ineos' point-man for its ‘relationship with government and industry’. Documents released to Spinwatch under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) reveal how in 2014 he organised meetings for Ineos’ billionaire owner, Jim Ratcliffe, with permanent secretary Stephen Lovegrove and other DECC top brass, ahead of the company’s final decision to enter the shale gas market.

A regular on the shale gas conference circuit, Erwin has argued that fracking is vital for the country’s future. In a speech in summer 2015 he warned that without shale gas the UK risked becoming an environmental ‘theme park'; a strategy he called ‘massively irresponsible’.

At the same event Erwin acknowledged the importance of talking to and 'standing up in front of communities' in potential shale gas areas. Yet less than a year later he and two other senior Ineos directors held a series of closed private meetings with parish councillors to discuss plans for Ineos license blocks in Cheshire, Derbyshire and North Yorkshire.

Despite FOIA requests, DECC refused to publicly name Erwin as the government’s man seconded to Ineos. Erwin only declared the secondment on his LinkedIn profile after it had ended in 2016. Last month he joined Northern Powergrid as its policy and markets director. [17]

Hiring former PM and business and energy secretary special adviser

Later in 2017 Spinwatch also revealed that INEOS's lobbyists Burson Marsteller had also employed Meg Powell-Chandler, a former PM’s political aide and special adviser to UK business and energy secretary Greg Clark. Under the broken system regulating the revolving door between big business and politics, the public often has no automatic right to know about such appointments.[18]

Lobbying against green energy taxes

In April 2017 it emerged Ineos was pushing the government to use Brexit as a chance to exempt the chemicals sector entirely from climate policy costs. Documents obtained by Friends of the Earth revealed that an industry-government initiative Chemistry Growth Partnership chaired by Ineos director Tom Crotty, was lobbying to get rid of the UK’s carbon floor price ( a carbon tax on electricity generators) as part of their efforts to cut energy costs passed on to chemical companies.

The objective, as revealed in the documents, is to: 'Support appropriate policies to enable the safe exploitation of unconventional gas [shale gas], sustainable use of biofuels and optimal use of waste resources.'[19]

Bullying tactics: threatens to sue the National Trust if it doesn't agree to seismic surveys

In July 2017 Ineos said that it had been trying to get permission to carry out seismic surveys in Nottinghamshire's historic Clumber Park from the National Trust for over a year, but claimed that the Trust had refused to discuss and so Ineos was considering legal action.

If the National Trust refuses to change its position, Ineos will have no choice but to write to the Oil and Gas Authority, asking for permission to seek a court order enforcing its rights to carry out these surveys on National Trust land,” Ineos said in a statement.

Director Tom Crotty argued that Ineos's ability to extract shale gas would be 'significantly limited' if tests could not be carried out on the Trust's land.

'The National Trust is taking an overtly political position against all fossil fuels. What it fails to recognise is that shale gas is 50% cleaner than coal and 30 per cent cleaner than oil. The development of shale gas will actually reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We are developing a shale gas industry that is safe and essential for the UK and the economy. It is estimated that the industry will create tens of thousands of well-paid jobs and Ineos has pledged to give 6 permission of revenue to local people - potentially amounting to billions of pounds.” [20]

In a statement announcing the application submission, INEOS said it believes the trust has 'behaved unreasonably', adding that 'it is firmly in the national interest and a court order would back our position'. Rob Coyle, Ineos Shale's chief executive, accused the Trust of ‘failing to engage with us or the science’ and even warned that it will withhold profits from the Trust for being obstructive, if it does eventually win permission.

In January 2018 the Telegraph reported that the National Trust had sent a 'heartfelt letter' to INEOS asking it to abandon Clumber Park survey plans. Beth Dawson General manager of National Trust Clumber Park invited INEOS staff to visit the Grade-1 listed parkland, which is a designated site of special scientific interest, receives half a million visitors a year, and has a number of internationally protected species of birds. [21]

Hiring ex-MPs to write PR booklets

In December 2017 INEOS Shale controversially commissioned the former North East Derbyshire MP Natascha Engel to write an 'information 'booklet' which would 'better explain shale exploration and development' and would be distributed to locals in the areas where it was applying to drill for shale gas, such as Marsh Lane, near Eckington. Operations director Tom Pickering explained that Engel's assistance would 'give us a better insight into the needs and concerns of residents. As a former Labour MP and trade unionist, Natascha has always made the case for good jobs, as well as health and safety. At the same time, Natascha is well placed to give us a full understanding of local issues and help us to continue to be an open and inclusive organisation.'

Engel explained her rationale to carry out this work in INEOS's press release:

I saw first-hand what the impacts are on small communities when they hear about a shale gas application near them – even when it’s only for exploratory drilling. What people want is information. They want to know how it will affect them and they want reassurance that it is safe. I hope that this booklet will provide some of those certainties.

Most of all I hope that this will allow INEOS to work constructively with communities so that local people gain the most in terms of the jobs and apprenticeships that this industry could bring – something I have campaigned on for most of my adult life. [22]

Engel's decision was criticised by several Labour MPs. Anne Western, leader of Derbyshire Labour Group said:“Natascha Engel’s decision to work on behalf of Ineos is shocking and disappointing. Natascha’s views on fracking are entirely her own and do not represent Labour Party policy or the views of many Labour members.”

Dennis Skinner the Labour MP for Bolsover said: 'The Labour Party is totally against fracking. Our policy, adopted at the party conference in 2016, is to ban fracking completely in the UK and to back clean technologies and renewable energy. I have been campaigning against fracking locally and in Parliament. I recently raised the matter with Theresa May at PMQs because of the water contamination at Oxcroft. Unlike Lee Rowley, who made it clear last week during a Westminster Hall debate that he doesn’t oppose fracking in principle, only in north east Derbyshire, I am against fracking wherever it is proposed.'[23]

Injunction against potential protesters at its sites

In July 2017 Ineos Shale secured an interim High Court injunction against anti-fracking protestors[24] at a private hearing with no members of the public or press present.

Operations director Tom Pickering told the Press Association that the move by INEOS was not an attempt to quash peaceful protest but instead taken for safety reasons. He said:

'I have a duty of care to the employees, contractors and public at large that is in the health and safety act as written words to ensure and protect their safety and that includes a protester. As I plan for my operations, I can see all the unlawful protest that has happened. Real extreme and dangerous protest. Lorry surfing, releasing loads, blocking up a high way – all of these types of things, which are criminal acts anyway. But I think it had not been addressed with a very clear line of what is acceptable and what is not. What I want to be clear on is that we constantly respect peaceful protest. Nothing about Ineos Shale is going to stop listening to people and engaging with people.” [25]

'Draconian, anti-democratic and oppressive’

Campaigners described the move by Ineos and the courts as ‘draconian, anti-democratic and oppressive’. The high-profile group Talk Fracking, accused INEOS of trying to privatise the law, saying: ‘If this injunction is allowed to stand, it will mean that any corporation can apply for a 'pre-emptive injunction' of this nature to prevent any protest by 'persons unknown' at any site in the future, citing the INEOS injunction as a precedent. This, in effect, could shut down peaceful protest across the UK, or at least make it far more difficult to organise without running the risk of draconian punishment.’

Campaigners challenged the injunction at a court hearing in September 2017, but the judge ruled in the chemical giant's favour for it to continue. During the hearing, it emerged that INEOS had amassed thousands of pages of Facebook posts and tweets as evidence that it faced ‘a real and imminent threat’ of being targeted by unlawful protests.[26]

Campaigners take case to Court of Appeal

In January 2018 anti-fracking campaigner, Joe Corré, announced he was taking his legal case against Ineos to the Court of Appeal. Legal papers lodged with the court argue that the ‘learned judge erred in law by permitting a claim for injunctive remedies against 'Persons Unknown', as well as ‘wrongly prohibiting conduct which is lawful’. Corre's legal team also contend that the injunction breached the Court's obligations under Section 6 of the Human Rights Act and Articles 8, 10, and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [26]

Victory for campaigners

In April 2019 three Court of Appeal judges finally ruled in favour of anti-fracking activists Joe Corre and Joe Boyd to overturn INEOS' sweeping and draconian injunction.

In granting the appeal, Lord Justice Longmore and two other judges ruled that INEOS' initial injunction was “too wide and insufficiently clear” and that the judge who granted the injunction had “attempted to do the impossible” - making an order that was “too wide and too uncertain”.

The judges discharged part of the original injunction relating to demonstrations in public areas and protesters combining together with the intention of damaging Ineos, which campaigners argued was having a serious effect on lawful and legitimate protest activities. According to Longmore, “The citizen’s right of protest is not to be diminished by advance fear of committal except in the clearest of cases.”

Two other aspects of the injunction remain, pending reconsideration by the high court of whether the campaigners’ right to freedom of expression as outlined in the Human Rights Act would be restricted. Reacting to the ruling INEOS boss Tom Pickering told the media: “We are talking with our legal team about our next steps, because we believe it is essential that the forces of law and order prevail. We respect peaceful protest, but we must stand up to the militants who game the legal system with intimidation and mob rule. We stand for jobs and opportunity. They stand for anarchy in the UK.”[27]

Campaigner Joe Corre said: "Today's win is a fantastic result and has restored my confidence in the British Legal system. INEOS thought they could game the British legal system by using ASBO laws designed to protect people, against the people. They can think again!" [28]

Fracking in Scotland

In 2015 Ineos launched a 'Scottish shale gas community engagement programme' to help tackle the opposition that has emerged against fracking in the region. Its campaign, dubbed 'love bombing' by campaigners, aimed to persuade people that fracking technology was safe, and how the process could bring huge economic benefits to locals.

The petrochemical company's sudden concern for the nation's economic performance was considered somewhat perplexing, given the Grangemouth controversy that had erupted just a few months earlier, when Ineos chose to keep its plant shut despite the cancellation of the planned strikes - actions that saw it accused of holding Scotland 'to ransom'.[29]

Scotland has had a moratorium on shale gas, coal bed methane and underground coal gasification since 2015. In June 2016 when the Scottish Parliament voted for a permanent ban Ineos responded by stating that the vote made little difference.

The vote this evening changes very little. A process remains in place in Scotland to further assess scientific, evidence based research before a decision is taken on fracking.

This has important implications for the people of Scotland and its economy and should not be prejudged before it has reached its conclusion. INEOS has been clear that it believes shale gas can be extracted safely and that Scotland is losing out as the centre of excellence moves south.

We are focused on England where we believe that shale can provide much-needed jobs, investment and energy security.” [30]

Meetings with ministers

21 June 2017 - Senior Scottish ministers held private meetings with INEOS and Grangemouth executives from China five times in 13 months, reports Rob Edwards at The Ferret. Briefings released under freedom of information law show that in 2016 Nicola Sturgeon met Ineos boss Jim Ratcliffe and Chinese businessmen who are involved in helping to run the Grangemouth refinery. The Deputy First Minister John Swinney and economy secretary Keith Brown also met with Ineos managers. The purpose of the meetings has been kept secret.[31]

PR films countering anti-fracking concerns

INEOS, Fracking facts water contamination: 'Some campaigners claim fracking leads to water contamination. That is not the case. This video explains the facts.' Published on Youtube May 2016.

In September 2016 it was reported that '[a]s part of its campaign to win over critics, Ineos invited journalists to tour fracking sites in Pennsylvania operated by Consol, a Pittsburgh-based producer of natural gas and coal and, supposedly, an example of why fracking will be good for the UK.' [32]

First shipment of shale gas

In September 2016, a tanker carrying ethane from the US sailed up the Forth to the Ineos refinery in Grangemouth. Ineos said the shipment was the result of a £1.6billion investment in eight tankers that will form a 'virtual pipeline' for shale gas between the US and the UK and Norway. 'The Intrepid' - its smaller sibling, the INEOS Insight, was the one to dock in Forth - is one of four Dragon-class vessels that have already been delivered to Ineos. Over the next year, another four will be built and launched. [33]

Ineos claims the gas will replace dwindling North Sea supplies, and secure the future of Grangemouth’s 1300 workforce, and a further 9000 Scottish jobs.

When the shipment arrived, many politicians and environmental groups criticised the gas, fearing it will be a first step on the road to allowing fracking in Scotland.
Mark Ruskell MSP, the Scottish Greens' climate, energy and environment spokesman, said:

'As well as shale gas, the so-called 'dragon' fleet of ships docking in Scotland will also bring with them a renewed campaign by Ineos for fracking to be given the go ahead. The Scottish Government must legislate for an outright ban on fracking because its vague 'moratorium' policy is clearly giving hope to fossil fuel giants intent on digging up Scotland.' [34]

PR Junket for journos to greet the US shale gas supertanker arrival

INEOS wined and dined journalists and paid for their 4-star hotel overnight stays in Edinburgh plus return flights to the city, as part of a PR junket to promote the arrival of its super gas tankers from the US. Scottish investigative site The Ferret reported that INEOS was due to host a dinner at the Wedgwood restaurant, with breakfast the following morning on a boat on the Firth of Forth ahead of meeting the gas tanker INEOS Insight. Longstanding INEOS PR company Media Zoo organised the junket. The event received extensive press coverage across the UK. [35]

Responses to the Scottish Government report and moratorium

On the Scottish Government's decision to impose both a report and moratorium on fracking, Ratcliffe said: 'We have no objection to people evaluating safety and environmental issues, I think that’s all very fair and proper. But it probably would have been quite sensible to let us at least do the exploration phase in Scotland.' [36]

One of the biggest fears of the Scottish government regarding shale gas is the lack of regulation shown in the US. In September 2016, Ineos insisted that fracking in the UK will be different than in the US. It argues that the technology has come a long way over the past decade. Also, as the US fracking industry has matured, lessons were learned, making it easier to replicate best practices on fracking sites in the UK. To ease the inconvenience of light, noise and traffic during drilling, Ineos also promised to give 6% of its profits to the UK communities where it will frack. [9]

APPG Debate on fracking in Scotland

In a debate hosted by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Unconventional Oil and Gas (APPGUOG) in December 2016, Stephen Tindale, now a consultant to INEOS Shale, defended the idea of fracking in Scotland. He argued that '[s]hale is a necessary part of decarbonisation' as the demand for gas-based sources of heating will remain high for several decades. Tindale also argued that, while shale gas extraction did not have a public license now, it did have a human rights element to it as it would mean less dependency on imports from states who do not respect the human rights of their people. He responded to the argument that fracking destroyed jobs in other sectors such as renewables and conventional oil and gas by blaming the government instead for its erratic policies on renewables.

On the question of whether shale gas extraction is beneficial to the economy, Tindale said:

'Nobody knows because the geology of the UK is very different from the US so it needs to be tested. Is that a waste of money? It might be. The question then is whose money is it? Is it public money? No. [...] [W]e shouldn’t give public money to it but we should be prepared to allow them [the companies] to proceed [investments] if they have their own money. [37]

Legal action against Chinese companies over misuse of trade secrets

In March 2014 Ineos announced it was taking legal action against a number of Sinopec and Sinopec subsidiaries (SNEC, Anqing and others) for breach of contract and/or misuse of trade secrets.

INEOS says that Sinopec Ningbo Engineering Company has broken a long established technology agreement which, together with trade secret misuse by other Sinopec companies, has enabled development of a series of new world scale Acrylonitrile plants without INEOS agreement or consent. INEOS, which has otherwise excellent relationships with Sinopec and with China, has no choice other than to protect its intellectual property. INEOS fears that these breaches of rights will cause major harm to its Acrylonitrile business which generates up to $500m per annum of profit and has a replacement value of $3 billion. It supports around 5,000 direct and indirect jobs in the USA and Europe. [38]

Former executives

Patrick Erwin, commercial director of Ineos Upstream, leading on commercial strategy, developing partnerships and on asset purchase - led the economics and work programme parts of for INEOS’s application to the 14th Onshore Licensing Round. Seconded from central government 2013-May 2016, then on staff until December 2016 before leaving to join Northern Powergrid.

Calum MacLean - a founder member of INEOS in 1998 and chairman O&P Europe and chief executive officer O&P Europe (UK) since 2011. He left to join rival chemical company Synthomer in January 2015. Several months later Ineos COO Steve Bennett also joined the company. [39]

Lobbying and PR firms

External

Watch 'Meet the Frackers: a Spinwatch lobbying tour' to find out more about the lobbyists INEOS hires to help it push fracking in the UK

*Burson-Marsteller (B-M) took over the Ineos account in July 2014 from Portcullis Public Affairs who had retained it for several years. Freedom of information requests reveal that B-M has set up meetings with UK government ministers for INEOS. In 2017 B-M hired Meg Powell-Chandler, a former special adviser to business and energy minister Greg Clark and former prime minister David Cameron. [40] In June 2018 Trade industry magazine PRWeek reported that B-M was no longer handling Ineos's account.

Media Zoo’s UK media relations and reputation management brief includes communicating with trade organisations and governments in the US and Germany, which are key markets for Ineos. [41] Creative director Mark Killick works on the Ineos account. [42] along with Andrew McLachlan and Hannah Brandstaetter. Media Zoo has also facilitated press trips from the UK to view the company's operations in the US