If the new filters are enforced, this could delay upload times for YouTube, which presently logs about 60 hours of new video per minute. This would definitely be a hit to the service - a main reason why many users steer clear of other video hosting sites, like Vimeo, is because of the long processing times. A YouTube clip is processed very quickly, and a Gema-endorsed filter would likely hinder this to an unknown extent, with copyrights having to be cleared. On the other hand, if a random user is monetizing an unsigned artist's content on YouTube, which happens all the time, this is also a bad thing, which would warrant longer wait times. As of now, video content can be posted faster than real time - meaning, an hour long clip can be put online in ten minutes, so there's no way some oDesk employee in Tangier might have pre-screened it. It is evident that it will likely be a while for YouTube and Google to sort out the most efficient balance regarding how its content is legally uploaded.

Google had no comment on the German ruling, concerning the trial that has been ongoing since 2010. YouTube had initially blocked all Gema content from its site for a time in 2009, likely aware that the organization would create a problem down the road with its royalty demands. Gema had also sued Rapidshare in 2009, prompting that site to better filter its content. Gema also basically ran Grooveshark out of Germany, who'd stated that Gema's licensing rates essentially made it impossible to make any sort of profit.