(Newser)
–
The remark that ended Helen Thomas' career "was, quite simply, a disgraceful, thoughtless and indefensible statement"—but she does have a constitutional right to share her indefensible opinions. That contrarian view comes from across the Atlantic, where Guardian media blogger Roy Greenslade is weighing the "wider implications" of Thomas' ouster.

The agency that booked Thomas' speeches dumped her, too, and that raises a red flag. "So, in the land of the free, where freedom of speech is guaranteed under the constitution, a person who expresses what are deemed to be controversial views is effectively gagged," writes Greenslade, who's keeping the Guardian's comment moderators extra busy today. "It is one of those rare occasions in which one can see clearly how people in America who are willing to express anti-establishment opinions are demonized, marginalized and finally excluded from public debate."

Notice how the writer has to call her comment disgraceful before he defends her so he doesn't get character assassinated, maybe she should of just said Israel should return to their original borders, but then Israel's population when not fit before all of their forceful colonialism and soft power tactics.