Formed as a relation between historical context and contemporary conflicts, the structure is defined by three major aspects: contact with the groundwork, contemporary paradigm of library, and relation of modern user with the printed and digital media. At the point of contact with the ground, archaeological remains are incorporated into the building as its thematic definition, but in a way they are not degraded. Further development of the system was generated by the uncertainty of future library development as an institution. Maximum flexibility was a logical conclusion. By manipulating the topography, system is modified according to needs and number of users, fulfilling many functions by the means of a singular generic module. The alteration of each modular unit affect the adjacent units in terms of height, creating soft boundaries of a pixelized space.

This entry was posted
on Sunday, February 5th, 2012 at 9:16 pm and is filed under 1112M4 Design Studio.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Log

09/09/2016

Peer reviewed paper Dj. Stojanovic, M. Milos, M. Vujovic, 'Why does architecture need to move? The role of Integrated Technical Systems in Architecture' to be published in the Springer Series "Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing-AISC", with the title: "Advances in Robot Design and Intelligent Control"- Proceedings of the 25thConference on Robotics RAAD2016.

09/21/2015

DS essay 'Digital Dexterity' included in the book 'Design Engineering Re-focused', edited by Hanif Kara and Daniel Bosia, to be published by Wiley in October 2016.

DS, MC, peer reviewed short paper'Computing the Anatomy of Tehran' included in 'Rethinking Comprehensive Design: Speculative Counterculture', Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA2014. The conference will take place at Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto, Japan, 14-17 May 2014.