- Continuity is or it is not. There is no such thing as soft continuity.- A character IS his continuity.- Continuity is consistency of the characteristics of people, plot, objects, and places seen by the reader or viewer.- The Outhouse. We're not CBR yet, but the mods are trying really hard.

And in continuity kryptonians can't multiply themselves, make cheesy looking cellophane nets out of his S symbol, or use telekinesis.

Fortunately not even in your dream world does Superman kill Zod.

- Continuity is or it is not. There is no such thing as soft continuity.- A character IS his continuity.- Continuity is consistency of the characteristics of people, plot, objects, and places seen by the reader or viewer.- The Outhouse. We're not CBR yet, but the mods are trying really hard.

Rain Partier

The Beast wrote:Oh, snap! Once again Martin's followers fail at logic and reason.

I guess I'm just annoyed that Zimmerman's branded a racist, people are rioting, The media has NOTHING else to talk about, etc. but Scott, under very similar circumstances (I think he was on thinner ice than Zimmerman, to be honest) doesn't have his life destroyed, he's not called a racist for shooting a kid of a different race, celebrities & politicians never involved themselves, the media never blew things out of proportion, etc.

Rain Partier

The Beast wrote:Oh, snap! Once again Martin's followers fail at logic and reason.

I guess I'm just annoyed that Zimmerman's branded a racist, people are rioting, The media has NOTHING else to talk about, etc. but Scott, under very similar circumstances (I think he was on thinner ice than Zimmerman, to be honest) doesn't have his life destroyed, he's not called a racist for shooting a kid of a different race, celebrities & politicians never involved themselves, the media never blew things out of proportion, etc.

P&#1062;&#1048;K&#1063; &#1042;&#1071;&#1025;&#106

LobsterJ wrote:Are you being hyperbolic for effect or are you actually claiming you couldn't own a gun in 2004 in Chicago?

A handgun. Effectively. Chicago until a Supreme Court decision in 2010 did not allow handgun possession of guns bought and registered after 1982, when a city-wide handgun ban went into effect. McDonald v. Chicago forced them to allow such ownership. though they're still making it as hard as humanly possible.

P&#1062;&#1048;K&#1063; &#1042;&#1071;&#1025;&#106

LobsterJ wrote:Are you being hyperbolic for effect or are you actually claiming you couldn't own a gun in 2004 in Chicago?

A handgun. Effectively. Chicago until a Supreme Court decision in 2010 did not allow handgun possession of guns bought and registered after 1982, when a city-wide handgun ban went into effect. McDonald v. Chicago forced them to allow such ownership. though they're still making it as hard as humanly possible.

Achilles is the kind of evil that hollows out a volcano for a lair, and sends killer robots after his enemies.---Lord Simian