On 30/04/15 07:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> Please read the reported bug and bjorn answer.. which does not help any to a solution of fix, or explenation.
> But the big question now is, does someone somewhere know what bjorn is talking about.
>> i did search for "gencache" but no go here..
> just from old documentation.
>https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/tdb.html> gencache.tdb Generic caching database.
>>> Greetz,
>> Louis
>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba-bugs at samba.org [mailto:samba-bugs at samba.org]
> Verzonden: woensdag 29 april 2015 17:51
> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> Onderwerp: [Bug 11241] different ids even when idmap.ldb copied.
>>https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11241>> Björn Jacke <bj at sernet.de> changed:
>> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Resolution|--- |INVALID
> Status|NEW |RESOLVED
>> --- Comment #1 from Björn Jacke <bj at sernet.de> ---
> this is not a supported thing to do, so this is not a valid bug. winbindd has a
> different way of caching (investigate gencache for example) entries and this is
> probably what makes that hack stop working for you with winbindd.
>
Hi Louis, no I don't understand what Bjorn is talking about, but then I
don't think that Bjorn really understands the problem. What if somebody
got sysvol to replicate, you would quickly end up with a mess, if a
policy was added on one DC, it would end up being owned by
somebody/group on the other DC, this is a regression.
Rowland