On 11/21/2009 12:18 AM, Austin Lund wrote:
> 2009/11/21 Austin Lund<austin.lund at gmail.com>:
>> 2009/11/21 Paul Vriens<paul.vriens.wine at gmail.com>:
>>>>> if (abs(date2 - date1) == 1)
>>> skip("We dont't check access times on a FAT filesystem\n");
>>>>>>> "The date is always within 1 day (plus or minus)."
>>>> It isn't quite that easy as the date field is a bitpacked struct
>> holding the year, month and day. So you have to account for month and
>> year boundaries. In the absence of any other ideas or tips to where I
>> can find a function to do this for me, I implement the calendaring
>> increments and send a patch which follows the above idea.
>>>> Here is an attempt at doing this. Is there a better/cleaner way to do this?
A lot of code to get around this issue. I tried playing with
DosDateTimeToFileTime() and CompareFileTime() but that doesn't help much
either.
I'm curious how important a test on a FAT filesystem is. If it's
important we should test it otherwise I'd say your previous suggestion
make sense:
if (date1 == date2&& time1 == time2) ok(TRUE, "Blah");
else skip("Not testing access times on this filesystem\n");
What happens when these tests are run on Wine with a FAT filesystem btw?
--
Cheers,
Paul.