Prague’s leadership has for months been trying to remove an article from
an agreement signed between the Czech capital and Beijing during the rule
of previous coalition, which refers to the One China concept. Mayor Zdeněk
Hřib says the agreement should be apolitical and that including the
formulation was a mistake. However, on Wednesday, China asked the Prague
government not to interfere in Czech-Chinese relations, accusing
Prague’s mayor and government of having behaved “very badly on issues
involving China’s national sovereignty and core interests”. I asked
Filip Jirouš of the China focused think-tank Sinopsis why Prague’s
attempt met with such a strong reaction.

Filip Jirouš, photo: Věra Luptáková / Czech Radio
“It is actually rather unusual for the Chinese foreign ministry spokesman
to target a specific city government. This shows how symbolic and sensitive
this issue is for the Chinese government, because they are really unhappy
with how the Prague leadership is behaving and how it is trying to amend
the treaty that it signed with Beijing."

Was originally agreeing to the specific point in the document a
mistake?
Did it unnecessarily introduce politics into a cultural agreement?

“Yes. This sort of article is not usually a part of such a type of
agreement. Generally, these documents tend to be rather unpolitical. For
example, if you look the treaties that Prague has with other Chinese cities
like Shanghai, or Guangzhou, you see that this is not a normal part of such
a deal.

“The prevalent opinion is that getting rid of that article is basically
normalising the Prague-Beijing relationship to a sort of normally
understood exchange.”

The agreement had a set duration period of five years. Would it not
have
been wiser for Prague to wait until it ran out and then negotiate new
terms, as some are saying?

“Technically, it may have been a better move. However, at the same time,
it was basically a part of revisiting the agreement by the new Prague
administration. They realised that the agreement is not what it is supposed
to be.

“This basically led to them to try and amend the agreement, and they
probably did not expect negotiations to go on for so long – it’s been
five or six months already. Nor did they likely think that the Chinese
would be so sensitive to this. There is basically no rationale for the
article being a part of the agreement.”

Photo: PixabayHow do you expect this situation to develop in the coming months,
perhaps
years? What is likely to happen?

“To be honest, I do not expect the Chinese side to back down. National
sovereignty and China trying to push its own language into agreements,
deals and norms all around the world has been a very sensitive and
important issue under Xi-Jinping’s rule.

“Therefore, I expect they will try to pressure the Prague leadership as
well as other entities in the Czech Republic that are critical towards
China and basically attempt to silence them. This is what they have been
trying to do with the Prague mayor as well as with certain officials and
politicians in the Czech political landscape.

“They will try to keep the pressure on and there will likely be no new
agreement. So I think the mayor is now facing two options: annul the
agreement, or simply ignore the fact that there is this clause.”