8 March 2011 Muad’dib (John Anthony Hill) out of jail. After 150 days in Wandsworth jail – for no crime at all. His court hearing is set for May.

6th December 2010

In the gloomy depths of Wandsworth jail, I met a remarkable British visionary.

Anthony John Hill has named himself ‘Muad’Dib’ after the teacher-figure in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi classic Dune. He is the author of what is by far the most influential of 7/7 videos, The Ripple Effect. It was wonderful to meet him, and a rare pleasure to have a chat with someone so deeply versed in the whole 7/7 issue. I brought him some mince pies, but wasn’t allowed to give them to him. But, I was allowed to give him a book, and gave him The Cabbala of Power by Israel Shamir. That would keep him busy, I figured, through the long, lonely hours.

He’d been there about a week, after losing his case against extradition in Dublin’s supreme court. His defence had accused the British crown of being corrupt and wicked! We must surely agree with Richard D. Hall that that the Crown’s case against Muad’Dib is ‘the most preposterous case you have ever heard in your entire life.’ But, Mr Hill wasn’t depressed, he assured me. He had a cheerful countenance, marvellously serene in fact, with his long, white beard. I could not recall having seen such a long, white beard that was for real.

He asked me, had anything on the Inquest gone against his Ripple Effect story? I opined that, possibly the testimony of the Woodall service station forecourt-manager, that at 5 am on July 7th he had seen only one other person in the car when Tanweer was buying petrol, could indicate that Khan was not with them. (In addition, tho I didn’t say this, one would have to regard several witness testimonies as false or mistaken).

Was he short of books to read? He had two, he explained, the Bible and the Koran. During the week he was in jail, Muslims had gathered around him when they were allowed out of their cells each day, to listen to him talking to them about the Ripple Effect. He was then moved to a different cell, which he shares with one Muslim. He has conversations with this inmate, he told me, where he discourses on how the Koran and Bible are compatible, how they relate together.

I came away with a feeling that I had witnessed some kind of Old Testament parable, of The Just Man in Captivity. I have been much abused and vilified in public, from pursuing the topic of 7/7 truth – through which Muad’Dib supported me – but, at least I haven’t gone to jail. He is worried he may lose his home in Dublin which he keeps by means of housing benefit.

The specific charge in his EU Arrest Warrant was, an act intended or tending to pervert the course of justice. To pervert course of justice means something like suborning jurors or bribing judges, not sending amicus curae material, i.e. helpfully relevant information for the Court to peruse. If he gets a jury trial, the case should be laughed out of court. Or, if he gets a judge – it could mean life.

To obtain permission for this visit, I had to know his date of birth, which a friend of M.D. gave me.

Wilileaks Julian Assange kept in same Jail, goes on bail trial the same day

On 16th December, Anthony John Hill went on trial for bail at Southwark Crown Court. The same day, maybe the same time, Wikileaks editor Julian Assange went for bail trial at Westminster Magistrate Court. They have both been imprisoned at the same place, namely Wandsworth jail. Assange was let out, Mr Hill was not.

Anthony John Hill has not been allowed bail. This is a very terrible moment, when an innocent man is thus incarcerated. The bail hearing was held ‘in chambers’ i.e. in secret: all of his supporters were hustled out of the court room before it started. Bail was withheld (one gathers) on the grounds that Mr Hill might “re-offend” by contacting other people when out on bail.

Several weeks ago, the Supreme Court of Ireland proved to everyone just how corrupt they are when they extradited A.J. Hill, also known to supporters as “Muad’Dib”, for mailing DVDs of his Film, the “7/7 Ripple Effect” to a U.K. courthouse….NOT ONE SINGLE JUDGE IN IRELAND VIEWED THE DVD BEFORE CONCLUDING THAT A.J. HILL’S INTENTIONS WARRANTED EXTRADITION. How could a court determine his Intentions without ever viewing the DVD?

Wake-up Fremen/Free-men. It is time to follow Muad’Dib’s Example and fight for what is right in God’s Eyes. If you won’t stand up for someone else now, who will be left to stand up for you when they come to imprison YOU for telling the truth?

I again met this innocent and just man, kept in jail solely on account of the words of truth he might have to tell people, if they let him out. In our enjoyable discussion there were various key points he asked me to remember – but one is not allowed to write anything down in a prison visit, and I didn’t. I bought him a cup of hot chocolate.

He seemed in remarkably good spirits. He was soon giving me a detailed critique of the Israel Shamir book, which I had leant him before Xmas. It took a week for them to get round to giving it to him. There were certain errors in it, he explained. I can see how people enjoy listening to him.

He was denied bail because he ‘might re-offend’ the judge had said. I suggested to him in what the re-offence might consist, that he had been forbidden to discuss politics in the UK – by the Irish Supreme Court. (When Richard Hall interviewed him prior to the Irish trial, he therefore went up to Scotland) The ‘re-offence’ was that he might soon end up with a circle of people around him, discussing some important issues.

The judge had also (he had heard) averred that his website encouraged people to send his DVD to … the wrong people. But it didn’t, he explained to me.

He has his bail appeal on Jan 18th, at Southgate Magistrates court. He hopes this time to be allowed to be there personally.

I told him about how I was now being re-character-assassinated by Bridget Dunne (of the J7 team), and a sidekick of hers ‘The Antagonist’ whom she employs: he commented on her being an atheistic Jew, and said how he too had been attacked by her.

I asked him about my Revisionist interests, for which I have been greatly character-assassinated on all sides, and he assured me that such issues were by no means irrelevant to the modern issues of who was perpetrating 7/7 and 9/11. We were the two people most vilified by the BBC’s Conspiracy Files 7/7 program. It was quite reassuring to meet this fellow who was suffering so greatly for making the Ripple video – kept in a jail cell for 23 1/2 hours every day he told me, with one other person for company – and yet he somehow managed to keep his spirits up. He did not moan to me about anything.

They might just leave me in here to rot, he said. I quickly averted the horror of this prospect, by saying someone had told me, the authorities might keep him in for the duration of the Inquest but would hardly want to keep him there once it had finished.

While chatting to him, I could not help reflecting on how a discussion-circle based on the 7/7 issue could take place, if perchance Mr Hill were allowed out, and if he lived in London. Excuse me dreaming, but that would work. Every year as the 7/7 anniversary arrives – nothing happens, people are too nervous and mutually critical and suspicious: I have been too heavily vilified by the media for it to be feasible for me to hold meetings on the subject. ‘Muad’Dib’ would generally hold forth on the destiny of Britain etc in a way it seems to me that ordinary folk could comprehend. I found him knowledgeable but not dogmatic, he would suffer to be corrected and listen readily to other views.

18th January Southwark Crown Court – Mr Hill appealed against his being denied bail. The authorities took care not to announce the time of this hearing until the afternoon of the day before. Hill stated there that he wishes to represent himself for a preliminary argument concerning jurisdiction and a trial date of the 9th of May 2011 has been set.

THE CROWN VERSUS ANTHONY HILL

At his trial in May, Mr Hill has requested permission to speak for himself, and the judge has agreed to hear him: on the subject of the corruption and wickedness of the British crown, and something about the ‘coronation stone’ that was taken from Scotland, which is he believes not the real one! It’s all part of life’s rich texture. That will take about half a day. Then for the next three days, his lawyer (Mr Rakesh Bahsin) will argue before a jury that his client cannot be guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice, as has been alleged, by sending DVDs to the 2008 Kingston trial.

His lawyer has some hope of getting him out on bail* before then.

Here is a moving and well-balanced testimony from a Mr Paul Tayler, about Mr Hill’s incarceration (and he has now been inside for over a hundred days as I write this):

It seems to me that the NWO does take out very key people, such as Keith Mothersson and Mr Hill.

Bail conditions: when he was first arrested under the European arrest warrant in Ireland and given bail, he was let out under various bail conditions, viz:

Surrender of passport & driving license;

Paying a bond;

He must not travel;

He must not talk to anyone in England or Wales about the London Bombings (only allowed to talk about matters of a personal nature). That bail lasted for 18 months.

12th February 2011 Southwark Crown Court: a hearing for bail for JAH, to get him out of Wandsworth jail until his trial in May, was cancelled by the judge, on the grounds that JAH was not present in the court. The jail had not allowed him out to attend his bail hearing! That is not the first time this has happened to him. I had found one or two persons willing to put him up & write a letter saying so, and his lawyer had hoped that might suffice to get him out of jail.

Comments

All Court Cases are Commerce based and any charge brought against Anthony will be in order for The Court to make money. The case number may be a Cusip Number for floating on the Sea of Commerce – Admiralty Law (I believe that it is).

The Judge needs to be questioned if he acting as a Judge or a Banker/Captain of the Ship. If he states “as a Judge” that will immediately place him under his oath of office and unable to practice law from the bench. Challenge him/her on this.

You can also ask the Judge for details of their Public Liability Insurance if you are suspicious of malfeasance. They do not like that.

Contact Winston Shrout at Solutions in Commerce who will be able to give sound education on cases like this. He has helped many people in the past and kept them from going to jail.

Well done, Nick – taking time out to visit Muad’dib. I expect he was more than pleased to receive a visit from you. I hope you found him in good spirits. The poor man should not be in this position at all. He has clearly been persecuted by the State.

Of course, the BBC didn’t mention his extradition from Ireland, even though they previously spent nearly an hour of prime-time television trying to discredit him !

The biggest threat to Her Majestie’s Parliament since the ‘Guy Fawkes’ event in 1608 is an Irishman who calls himself Muad’dib. How can this be?

Easy, John A Hill, has proven that the Parliamentary Forces have murdered 56 Britons for political gain. Even James 1’s spymaster, Robert Cecil was not that stupid as to actually permit innocent people to be murdered in his plot.

But this article is about John Hill being imprisoned and being refused bail. Bail is an interesting aspect where a person ‘takes on the responsibility’ of the court and accepts custody of a prisoner, andalso ensures that the prisoner will abide by the laws and any requirements set as bail conditions.

In other words, a Magistrates or Judge can set conditions that John Hill would be required to meet if he was on bail, such as not to talk about his case or to meet people or attend an Inquest, etcetera, much the same as has been set on Hasina Patel.

So Julian Assange also gets a lodging in the same prison as John Hill, and applies for bail, and is again refused bail by the court for similar reasons as the court gave John Hill, that is that Julian may reoffend.

But this great anti-war hero, the pride of all our ‘independent free’ media, and a believe in the good grace of Benjamin Netanyahu, has both the courage and the money to appeal these bail conditions and gain his ‘freedom’.

Why does this remind me of the story of Jesus and Barabass?

It appears that Ireland is about to produce another saint to stand beside Saint Patrick, Saint John of the Muad’dib

Disconcerting to hear Muad Dib talking about Moses and the Bible on Jim Fetzer’s radio program. Dib displayed remarkable support for punishments carried out by Old Testament Jews. He openly promoted the putting to death of adulterers and those who dis-respect their parents. Perhaps he would also advocate the use of a crazed group armed with stones to pass sentence, just to add Old Testament authenticity.
These astounding views must cast doubt on the credibility of the film ‘The Ripple Effect’ which Muad Dib made. A film which I previously had respect for.

i disagree, first of all I am sick and tired of having issues ‘bundled’ i like Pizza and hitler liked pizza so Pizza is bad

John Hill may or may not have other opinions on other unrelated topics, I really wonder Andrew if you are a genuine truth seeker because we see this technique over and over again with Mel Gibson, Charlie Sheen, Nick Kollerstrum, David Shayler, David Icke and John Hill

The Laws you’re calling disconcerting is because of a lack of
understanding, and as a student of Biblical Law in accordance with the
teachings of Jesus, I can clarify common misunderstandings.

Recall that Jesus pardoned an adulterous woman because she was truly
repentant; her husband did not want to press charges, otherwise Jesus
could not pardon her.
Thus true repentance plays a role in carrying out Judgment. Whilst
those Jews then may not have exhibited compassion being ready to stone
her, this does not negate the perfection of God’s Laws. Secondly, in
regards to the other Law mentioned about parents, that Law refers to
the stubborn and rebellious sons, and not simply being disrespectful
to parents or others.
Research shows serial killers exhibit pathological traits as children,
and consider the pain, suffering and the lives lost that might have
been avoided. Deut. 21:18-21.

Muad’Dib demonstrated courage and truthfulness at the expense of
possible scorn and ridicule by not denying that God’s Laws are still
in effect today, but few take the time to study or learn this.

even though we are not friends I do admire you for visiting John Hill in prison for these outrageous trumped up charges. I can also concur with you that J7 is BULLSHIT. Bridget Dunne ( very likely a government gatekeeper) and Tom Secker whom I despise. Being villified by J7 is a compliment. I did some previous research on the Richmal issue and linked the attack on her with a Times columnist . the suggestion if you recall was that Rchmal wrote to the media to promote herself and used a pseudonym. my research was moved to the hidden part of the site that is not accessible to the casual visitor

I am convinced that J7 is a fake group and that despite containing genuine research and obviously having many sincere contributors is a honey pot so that the establishment can keep tabs on anybody who disagrees with the official version and keep people going nowhere