On March 23, Federal Reserve vice chair Stanley Fischer was the keynote speaker at a Brookings Institution dinner in Washington, DC.
There, he gave prepared remarks on regulatory policy and the Fed’s response to the financial crisis and took questions from the audience on the highly market-sensitive topic of interest rate policy.
Federal Reserve officials give speeches all the time. What makes this one notable is that it was closed to the public, Fischer’s prepared comments have not been made available, and that the speech took place at all was not widely known.
And, it came just days before another Fed official — Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker abruptly resigned after
admitting that he played a role in a 2012 leak of market-sensitive details of the central bank’s internal deliberation. That leak, which arguably damaged the Fed’s credibility, was to a private consultant which then shared the details with clients who stood to net millions in profits by trading ahead of the release of news.

As Lacker’s resignation shows, it’s a scandal that continues to haunt the Fed. It doesn’t, however, seem to have discouraged the central bank from letting officials speak in private settings where only a small group of people can glean insight from their comments.

Fischer’s participation and the nature of his comments were described to me by two conference participants. The Federal Reserve declined to comment for this story.
“There is always a dinner speaker who is off the record and reporters are not ever invited,” said Brookings Institution spokesperson DJ Norquist of the conference, which is an annual event.

Market-moving events

I don’t know exactly what Fischer said, in part because the Fed hasn’t put his comments up on its website like it does with other speeches.

But Fed actions are some of the most market-moving events in the world. Small pronouncements from a single official, especially one of Fischer’s inner-circle status, can have deep consequences in stock, bond, foreign exchange and other markets around the world. For that reason, every small non-public insight a trader or banker can acquire from the Fed has infinite potential value.

The rules, drafted in response to a Reuters report on a separate leak in 2010, specifically state: To the fullest extent possible, Committee participants will refrain from describing their personal views about monetary policy in any meeting or conversation with any individual, firm, or organisation who could profit financially from acquiring that information unless those views have already been expressed in their public communications.”

Fischer may not have said anything that immediately moved markets. But his very presence and willingness to take questions from financial sector executives and away from the media speaks to the kind of secrecy that the central bank portends to be countering with a transparency push that began under former chairman Ben Bernanke and has continued under Janet Yellen.

True, Brookings is a non-profit institution, not a bank. But its donors, the ones that get to attend these type of exclusive-access diners, include Wall Street megabanks. Its board of trustees includes Carlyle Group co-founder David Rubenstein and Glen Hutchins a co-founder of Silver Lake, two of the largest private-equity investors in the world, as well as high-level executives at Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan.

The 2012 leak, to Medley Global Advisors, raised new questions since his letter of resignation indicated he merely confirmed information that was already in Medley’s possession, suggesting at least one other leaker. And the Fed’s initial response was to paper over the issue with a toothless internal investigation, which was eventually taken over by the FBI and a congressional committee.

But what Fischer’s speech last month shows is that the Fed has yet to grapple with the opaque practices that lead to situations like this in the first place. When it comes to speaking in private to money-people, there’s just one thing left for Fed officials to do: Just stop.