Whirlibird, The constitution is in the left wing socialist way. They need to change it or take it down to get there way. The 1st Amendment is something that they can’t deal with. They want to only let there side have free speech. The 2nd Amendment is the heart of the 1st Amendment so if they can limit the 2nd Amendment to the point were they can take down the 1st Amendment well then they will take control of all the people.

Just-Us-es like Posner are like the guy with the chainsaw standing on the outer end of the branch they want to cut off right up against the trunk. If they cut it off where they stand, they’ll get dumped as they deserve. If they discard the entire document, in favor of unbounded power, they’ve thrown away the claim to any “authoritay” they might care to exercise. So instead, they prune the tree, one small branch at a time, grafting on branches of poisonous trees, in the hope that as it does progressively less to protect the rights of citizens, and allows the government to treat them with contempt, the dispirited citizens will eventually see no reason to protect it, and allow the constitutional tree to die.

Every constitutional branch, every leaf is precious. Every time we shrug and allow a small intrusion, “because it’s so small it’s not worth fighting for,” Posner and his ilk get closer to their goal — power without limit. They’ve already gathered a huge crew of pruners, grafters, fallers, chain saws, and skidders around that tree. It’s our job to stop them, despite the fact that what we’re preparing for is the likelihood that they’ll succeed.

With the SexDef’s recent announcement regarding transgender spending priorities, the fedgov is formally in pre-surrender mode. It seems to me that the government is really aimed at converting us to the ISA ( IUNA?) With luck, and more citizen good sense than is currently evident, that aim may miss.

Ignore the people who say ignore the Constitution and Bill of rights. But it’s also true you can’t reason with insane people. The fedgov surrendered to the democracy mob a long time ago. They don’t know the difference between sharia and satanism. Christ and Muhammad are the same person to them. The tax code is all they really know. The multinational banking corp is their king. Money is power even if it’s only a convenient fiction. That’s their downfall. Winter is coming.

This kind of breakup has been predicted by various writers and students of “political science,” including a
Russian academic. How long would it take for the current fedgov to decide to fund it? How long would it take such a gimme nation to become a branch office of ISIS, or the PRC? How long would it take for Prof. Davenport to seek asylum elsewhere?

What I find humorous is their desire to have their own States as part of a new country is that any US city that is majority black is a corrupt hell hole. A majority black State would equally be a disaster.

Most such proposals come bundled with demands for “reparations,” as though the entire white populace approved of and participated in slavery (most didn’t), although it was unfair economic competition for most of their ancestors, in the same way slave labor in China is unfair economic competition for all Americans today. But any fixed amount of reparations would soon be gone, and the cry of “more or war” would soon follow. Most of the reparations advocates either admit, or at least imply, that “enough” would never be “enough.”

Such movements are never led by reasonable people, and usually made up of the non-, or marginally-working, although Davenport is probably right about the relative ease with which first stage political takeover could be accomplished, provided he could persuade enough “pioneers” to abandon their freebies in the north, and get along without them for a while, in the (usually poorer) southern States. Sounds like an opportunity for George Soros to really show off his fortune.

The ironic part of this is that a sizeable portion (possibly the majority) of the current white population are descended of immigrant groups starting with the Famine Irish of the mid-1800’s that came at a time that they did not personally benefit from or participate in slavery. At the same time a sizeable portion of the black population in the US have white ancestors. I believe genetic testing puts it at a minimum of 30%. These are the people that as Leopard puts it would be considered “colored” in SA rather than black as we see it in the US. Granted that white ancestry was almost never the result of consensual relationships but if modern day people are to be found guilty of the actions of their ancestors even when their ancestors had nothing to do with slavery (mid-1800’s immigrant groups and thereafter), then even blacks need to be held accountable for the actions of their white ancestors.

As an aside, the 5 States that the author of the article wants for blacks are 5 of the 6 States with the most blacks as a percent of the total. What keeps it from being 5 for 5 is Maryland is the 4th most black State. It is fully possible that black migration into those 5 States could give them control, though I don’t see that as likely.

What I find humorous is their desire to have their own States as part of a new country is that any US city that is majority black is a corrupt hell hole. A majority black State would equally be a disaster.

MB. GS. The black population of NYC gave them control of the 2 amendment rights of upstate New Yorkers. The race war has already started here. Blacks don’t limit themselves to the south. Businesses upstate and public events are now considered soft targets. It’s on. It can’t be denied anymore. We’ve been put on the footing.

What I find humorous is their desire to have their own States as part of a new country is that any US city that is majority black is a corrupt hell hole. A majority black State would equally be a disaster.