Subject: Re: Allegro compilation warnings
From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.net>
Date: 2000/10/24
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3181385831231975@naggum.net>
* Mario Frasca
| Followup-To: misc.misc
When you engage in Followup-To wars like this, you show everybody
that you are a useless pest in _any_ forum. How could you think you
could possibly benefit from such moronic behavior? Did you intend
to show me that you really had a working brain? Well, _that_ failed.
| a few days ago I wrote you something like 'now I know how to read your
| posts'. maybe it is interesting for you to know what I meant by that.
No, it is not. People who decide that they have _found_ the answers
they need are braindead and not worth spending any effort on at all.
If your (stupid and even silly) conclusion about "how to read [my]
posts" is now decided and no longer open to evidence, it has itself
become prima facie evidence that you are no longer worth talking to,
because you prove with that methodology and approach that you cease
to listen when what people tell you goes against some property of
your personality. This is what I want people to show me and a small
number of people do not understand that they can do something other
than prove that they are prejudiced, braindead wastes of space
despite very clear signals that the simple act of making up their
mind to discard future evidence is what shows that my commentary on
their lack of thinking skills is _precisely_ to the point.
If they were _not_ complete morons, they would figure out that the
way to change somebody else's mind is to provide them with some
evidence contrary to their current beliefs, but since they do not
themselves change their mind in the face of contrary evidence, this
fantastically simple idea never enters their dysfunctional brain,
thus proving me right. One would have thought that the slightest
bit of intelligence at work would be able to predict the result, but
for some bizarre reason, the idiots who feel the urge to go postal
never acquire the ability to predict behavior that even _dogs_ have.
Let's make a wild guess and assume that you thought something along
these lines: "If I post this phenomenally uninteresting drivel and
direct followups to misc.misc, _then_ I will surely avoid being
attacked for behaving like a moron, because that's the smartest
thing I can possibly do." Am I getting close?
Do you think computer programs can predict what is likely to happen
in that scenario? Just how un-advanced artificial intelligence does
it take to out-predict Mario Frasca? Not a helluva lot, buddy.
| unfortunately, the isTechnical still needs some work at, so I do
| need to perform it by hand.
Amazingly, you managed to post something _intentionally_ devoid of
technical contents while complaining about others. That is pretty
darn funny when you want to prove that you have _nothing_ worthwhile
to say to a forum. Congratulations are in order.
| I think the rest of the newsgroup will appreciate if we switch to
| private e-mail for our off topic rants.
I think everyone would appreciate if you could just try and stop
your off-topic bullshit and get back on track, whatever the hell
that might have been.
#:Erik
--
I agree with everything you say, but I would
attack to death your right to say it.
-- Tom Stoppard