I
don’t know whether secretariat staff of CJI office &
DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding my appeals for justice ,
e-mails to you or not. They will be held accountable for their
lapses if any. This notice is against the repeated failure of
constitutional duties & indirect collusion with criminals by
previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is
served against them , to the office of CJI , NOT personally against you. At the
individual level I do whole heartedly respect
Honourable Justice R M Lodha.

Please
refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;

DLGLA/E/2013/00292

DEPOJ/E/2013/00679

The chief justice of india is not
replying to my repeated show-cause notices ,damage payment notices nor taking appropriate
legal actions , in time .However the
public servants take their thousands of rupees
salary & perks well in time without fail on 1stof every month. As a result
of continued negligence of constitutional duties since
years we public are suffering injustices , crimes
which could have been prevented are taking place. Thereby CJI is aiding the criminals in
committing crimes & cover up of crimes ,
in the course becoming a criminal himself.We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel
& martyrs for all thesacrifices made by them. Let us build a strong ,
Secular , Democratic India by getting rid off few corrupt
elements , anti nationals , traitors among publicservants
, among judiciary &among police who are greater threat to
India’ security & integrity than
Pakistani terrorists or chinese military.

Information input
forms part of process of one’s expression. One’s expressionin any
forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply.
Information & Expression are inseparable
parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason ,
Right to Expression is
the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person’s right to
expression is violated , his
other rightsto equality , justice , etc also are violated.
Suppression of Information amountsto curbing of Expression.In a democracy
, people have a right to know how the public servants arefunctioning
. However till date publicservants are hiding behind the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british
vintage created by british to suppressnative
Indians ). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act
is not beingfollowed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi
high court ruling affirming that CJI is under
RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is note worthy.Our previous RTI
request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP of GOK
and others were not honored. The information is sought were answers
to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the
past , present continuing injustices
meted out to millions of Indian citizens , due
to wrong / illegal workpractices of Indian judges
, police & public servants . The information wesought
would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in public
service .The information we are seeking are no
defense secrets , no national secrets .The
truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service & strengthens our national security
, national unity & integrity.

Hereby , i do request the honourable
supreme court of india , for a SupremeCourt monitored CBI Enquiry into this whole
issue as karnataka police are helpless , they don't have legal powers
to prosecute high & mighty ,constitutional functionaries. They
have not even enquired the guilty VVIPseven
once however Under pressure from higher-ups they
repeatedly calledme the
complainant to police station took statements from me all for closing the files.Hereby , I do
request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue
instructions to the concerned public servants
in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions. As the trial court Judges
cross verify the antecedents , history of the partiesin a
case to ascertain party’s honesty ,integrity ,
as the investigating policeofficers cross check the
antecedents , history of a complainant / accussed /witnesses to ascertain their honesty ,
integrity of the accussed / complainant ,in the same way the parties in a
case , as complainant / accussed / witnesseshave a right
to ascertain the integrity , honesty of the trial court judge
&investigating police officers
to ensure they are not biased and provide a fair ,level ground. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

RTI First Appeal Before :

Shri . M.K. Hanjura ,

Registrar & RTI First Appellate Authority ,

Supreme Court of India ,

New Delhi .

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

"Power
will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian
leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet
tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power
and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air
& water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the
House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved
right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives ,
police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.

Eventhough
the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied
citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly available ,
why didn’t the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned
departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High Courts
, etc.

The
action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their
crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to
previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority
SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges &
their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single
piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a
few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them /
shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs
of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do their
constitutional duties properly.

GIVE
WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED
IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES & FOLLOWING ARTICLES.

We
salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police ,
parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted
respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN
STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie
answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT
THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND ,
LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS
AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN
PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD
& CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES ,
EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN
JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :

Hereby
, we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India ,
Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the following questions
in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National
unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals ,
criminals within the judiciary & police.

8.
in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to pay
compensation to innocent victims who were wrongly charged , detained
& tortured , murdered by police , since independence till date ,
yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

9.
in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the
judgement of lower court. In how many such cases , lower court judge is
made to pay compensation to victims of their wrong judgement , since
independence till date yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

10.
how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual financial
returns giving out their wealth , income details , yearwise since
independence till date ? what action ? if not why ?

11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ?

12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to “death by hanging” , yearwise ?

13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?

14.
how many police officials were made to pay compensation &
prosecuted for defamation , when innocents falsely charged by police
were acquitted , dropped from charges by courts ? if not why ?

15.
how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation &
prosecuted for defamation , when innocents wrongly convicted by lower
court , but on appeal higher courts acquitting , dropping them of
charges ? if not why ?

16.
are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on
liquor / alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA DA bill while on
tour , official visits , official parties hosted by judges ?

17.
how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of
human & fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood , etc
were made to supreme court of india , by nagaraja mysore raghupathi
alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till date ? appeals were made
through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web through
DARPG , DPG. What ACTION taken by supreme court of india with respect
to each appeal ?

18.
due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were
meted out to public & public are still suffering injustices. Crimes
which could have been prevented by SC happened eventhough brought to
early notice of supreme court. What action against erring SC Judges ? if
not why ?

19.
I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to
apprehend criminals within judiciary , police & public service.
What action taken by supreme court of india ? if not why ?

22.
I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear
as amicus curie before supreme court of india & jain commission of
enquiry regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was not
permitted why ?

23. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action taken ? if not why ?

24.
Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law
interpretation is not same for common people , Judges & Police ?
why ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1990-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.

At
the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few
public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the
corrupt in public service don’t deserve respect as individuals – as
they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs
they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.

All
the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the
weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term “JUDGE”mentioned
throught includes all public servants discharging judicial functions
right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice
of India.

Indian
Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for
sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise their voice seeking justice
are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to
silence me in many ways . If
anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents ,
Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police
officer will be responsible for it.

Hereby,
we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable
supreme court of India & other government authorities, in
apprehending criminals including corrupt judges & police. Herewith ,
we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to
consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.

To
my repeated appeals for justice , repeated appeals to utilize my
services to apprehend criminals , repeated PIL petitions , repeated
appeals for information under RTI act , your response was
silence with respect to RTI applications literally no information was
given to 99% of queries nor you transferred the queries to respective
department which can provide answer . This silence or intentional
negligence of duty amounts to crime cover –up. Due to improper
action on your part crimes which could have been nipped at the bud
(information of crime given by us to SCI) happened , which amounts to
abetting crime. Once again if you deny me information to following
queries , you are reinforcing the proof that concerned supreme court of
india judges are also CRIMINALS
themselves. Answer following questions :

8.
in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to pay
compensation to innocent victims who were wrongly charged , detained
& tortured , murdered by police , since independence till date ,
yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

9.
in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the
judgement of lower court. In how many such cases , lower court judge is
made to pay compensation to victims of their wrong judgement , since
independence till date yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?

10.
how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual financial
returns giving out their wealth , income details , yearwise since
independence till date ? what action ? if not why ?

11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ?

12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to “death by hanging” , yearwise ?

13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?

14.
how many police officials were made to pay compensation &
prosecuted for defamation , when innocents falsely charged by police
were acquitted , dropped from charges by courts ? if not why ?

15.
how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation &
prosecuted for defamation , when innocents wrongly convicted by lower
court , but on appeal higher courts acquitting , dropping them of
charges ? if not why ?

16.
are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on
liquor / alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA DA bill while on
tour , official visits , official parties hosted by judges ?

17.
how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of
human & fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood , etc
were made to supreme court of india , by nagaraja mysore raghupathi
alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till date ? appeals were made
through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web through
DARPG , DPG. What ACTION taken by supreme court of india with respect
to each appeal ?

18.
due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were
meted out to public & public are still suffering injustices. Crimes
which could have been prevented by SC happened eventhough brought to
early notice of supreme court. What action against erring SC Judges ? if
not why ?

19.
I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to
apprehend criminals within judiciary , police & public service.
What action taken by supreme court of india ? if not why ?

22.
I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear
as amicus curie before supreme court of india & jain commission of
enquiry regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was not
permitted why ?

23. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action taken ? if not why ?

24.
Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law
interpretation is not same for common people , Judges & Police ?
why ?

The
public servants & the government must be role models in law
abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a
thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if
a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his
patronage. even if a
police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted
& justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just think , if a judge
himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime -
violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of
public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional
fundamental duties , what happens ? it gives a booster dose to the rich
& mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to committ
more crimes. that is exactly what is happenning in india. the educated
public must raise to the occassion & peacefully , democratically
must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then
alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

Kindly
go through the following articles & provide justice by giving
complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the
following questionnaire in an unambiguous manner.

The
constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each
citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &
uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , toprotect
our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our
fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to obstruct
the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal privileges
of constitutional functionaries is superior over the FUNDAMENTAL
DUTIES OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.

We
need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed
those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India & by
birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To
express ourselves , we need information , data feed back , to ascertain
whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether we are getting
equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,basically Right
To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights &
human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time limit ,
responsibilities of public servants up to certain extent. However the
citizen's fundamental right & human right to seek information
extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.

Hereby
, we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of India ,
with respect to my RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE ARE ONLY SEEKING
ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE.
Hereby , we request you to register this appeal as a PIL petition
& to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters raised in
my RTI Application , in public interest & equitable justice. Read :

We
salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament
& state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to
them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE
THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS
ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND
ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR
JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH ,
INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE
AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE
SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL
SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE ,
PROSECUTION , ETC. I do hope sense of constitutional propriety ,
justice will prevail. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.

I don’t know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG /
DPG officials are forwarding my appeals for justice , e-mails to you
or not. They will be held accountable for their lapses if any. This
notice is against the repeated failure of constitutional duties &
indirect collusion with criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF
INDIA. Notice is served against them , to the office of CJI , NOT
personally against you. At the individual level I do whole heartedly
respect Honourable Justice R M Lodha , Shri M K Hanjura & Smt
Smita Vats Sharma.

Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;

DLGLA/E/2013/00292

DEPOJ/E/2013/00679

In india democracy
is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO
INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the government,as the
information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps &
leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least
bothered about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat
cats , parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these
people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed
. so that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes
of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.

To
my numerous appeals , HRW’s appeals to you ,you have not yet replied.
It clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives of people
or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the
criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the police to enquire
me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all
with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy “legal immunity privileges”
,why don’t you have given powers to the police / investigating officer
to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why don’t all of you are not
appearing before the police voluntarily for enquiry ?at the least why
don’t all of you are not sending your statement about the case to the
police either through legal counsel or through post? you are aiding
criminals ,by denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS
mysore , city civil court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc &
by illegally closing my newspaper.there is a gross, total mismatch
between your actions and your oath of office. this amounts to public
cheating & moral turpitude on your part.

1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of neighbouring countries.6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a signatory.7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.

8.
As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have
caused me damages / losses to the tune of RUPEES TWO CRORE ONLY.

you
are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30
days , why you cann’t be legally prosecuted for the above mentioned
crimes .

If
i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of
investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages ,
transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly
the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer
of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the
guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the
culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must
not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward
happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with
hit & run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional
police together with above mentioned accussed public servants , Chief
Justice of India & Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be
responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police
file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this
complaint is & will be effective.

if
anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government
of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of
my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then
that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund.
afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the
salary , pension , property , etc of guilty judges , police officials ,
public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you. Jai
Hind , Vande Mataram.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

Ref : DEPOJ/E/2014/00531 RTI First Appeal sent via DARPG

APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

RTI First Appeal Before :

Shri . M.K. Hanjura ,

Registrar & RTI First Appellate Authority ,

Supreme Court of India ,

New Delhi .

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

At
the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few
public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the
corrupt in public service don’t deserve respect as individuals – as
they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs
they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.

All
the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the
weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term “JUDGE”mentioned
throught includes all public servants discharging judicial functions
right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice
of India.

Indian
Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for
sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise their voice seeking justice
are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to
silence me in many ways . If
anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents ,
Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police
officer will be responsible for it.

Hereby,
we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable
supreme court of India & other government authorities, in
apprehending criminals including corrupt judges & police. Herewith ,
we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to
consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.

The
public servants & the government must be role models in law
abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a
thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if
a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his
patronage. even if a
police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted
& justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just think , if a judge
himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime -
violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of
public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional
fundamental duties , what happens ? it gives a booster dose to the rich
& mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to committ
more crimes. that is exactly what is happenning in india. the educated
public must raise to the occassion & peacefully , democratically
must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then
alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

Kindly
go through the following articles & provide justice by giving
complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the
following questionnaire in an unambiguous manner.

The
constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each
citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &
uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , toprotect
our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our
fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to obstruct
the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal privileges
of constitutional functionaries is superior over the FUNDAMENTAL
DUTIES OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.

We
need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed
those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India & by
birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To
express ourselves , we need information , data feed back , to ascertain
whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether we are getting
equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,basically Right
To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights &
human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time limit ,
responsibilities of public servants up to certain extent. However the
citizen's fundamental right & human right to seek information
extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.

Hereby
, we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of India ,
with respect to my RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE ARE ONLY SEEKING
ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE.
Hereby , we request you to register this appeal as a PIL petition
& to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters raised in
my RTI Application , in public interest & equitable justice.

We
salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament
& state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to
them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE
THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS
ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND
ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR
JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH ,
INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE
AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE
SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL
SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE ,
PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :

9.
While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal a
day , people dying due to starvation , supreme court judges are getting
salary & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from the same
suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those duty shirking
judges ashamed ?

10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?

11.
Why the supreme court of india didn’t allow me to appear before it in
the said case of late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?

14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?

Main B :

You
have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests ,
Numerous appeals for justice & police complaints. You have not
replied to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has helped the
criminals in manipulating & destroying evidences.

Your
inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial
of information , but amounts to violation of our fundamental &
human rights , cover-up of crimes , aiding & abetting criminals .
The criminal nexus tried to silence me in many ways. Is not these acts
of your’s a crime in itself ?

If
your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups ,
aiding & abetting criminals , silencing a crusader is just &
legal. The same type of acts of crimes performed by other citizens will
also be legal ?

Main C :

At
the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all
constitutional institutions & to the honest few in public service.
Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being
made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This
is an appeal to the honest few in public service , constitutional
positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.

3.
just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state
legislature & how some MLAs vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita
in state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by
MPs & MLAs legal ? does not these constitute contempt of the house
by MPs & MLAs themselves ?

4.
all the people’s representatives from panchayath member to president of
India must read ABCD Of Democracy provide along with.since
independence of India till date , MPs & MLAs are forcing projects on
people against the wishes of people , formulating policies against the
wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies & Laws
, undemocratic & illegal ?

5.
is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of
affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?

6. how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?

7.
are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly
to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?

9. who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?

10.
the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin
raises even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices
of agricultural products , their companies register increase in turnover
/ profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them
receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?

Main D :

1.
we do once again offer our conditional services to the government of
india , all state governments & supreme court of india , in
apprehending tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt
judges , corrupt public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the
the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to
apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are
not ready to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?

2.
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information /
records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us ,
the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of
public servants , courts legal ?

3. why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints made by us ?

4.
why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts
to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our
complaint ) , from union & state home ministries ?

5.
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the
supreme court of India & national human rights commission has
failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high
profile case ? is it because it is not hi-fi , does not get image
ratings , TRPs ?

6.
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists ,
by their delaying tactics & denial of information , records. What
action has been taken against such anti-national elements in public
service ?

7.
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist ,
Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for justice)
to Karnataka police , to national human rights commission to supreme
court of India till date ? what action taken with respect to each
complaint ?

8.
the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to
following cases has resulted in more crimes , destruction /
manipulation of evidences , records and more injustices to commonman.
Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in
following cases ?

Q4. Don’t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law & order ?

Q5.
Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants ,
industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any
action with respect to them ?

Q6.
nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional
functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money ,
killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees ,
judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to
narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth &
provide timely justice ?Q7. If a commonman files a complaint ,
police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the
rich & mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a
complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough
there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?Q8. If
a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or
as per RTI ACT , the public servants don’t give full , truthfull
information. Still , police / courts don’t take action against those
public servants hiding crimes. Why ?Q9.why I was not permitted to
appear as an “amicus curie” before jain commission of enquiry or supreme
court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination
case ?Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my
news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government
service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false
fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against
culprits , why ?Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by
police & intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits
were not enquired even once , why ?Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?Q13.
Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of
witnesses & all parties involved , both during case & afterwards
?Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their family’s wealth year after year ?Q15.
While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon
to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to
sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to
police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check
candidate’s background. However is there no background checks of
constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national
secrets ? why ?Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made
allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one
of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank
, misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?Q18.india
preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india ,
more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death.
Inspite these background , GOI funded & aided terrorist outfits in
former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has
funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka ,
MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered
thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just
& legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ?
has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ?
why not ?Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain
terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided couter terrorist groups ,
is it right & legal ?Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the
government has armed , trained & funded “salwa judum” to counter
naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like
naxalites. Is this action of government just & legal ?Q21.in
india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where
there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped
against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF
personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of
taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc.
where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have
links with underworld , anti national elements & attended parties
hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where.
But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?Q22.
Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing
well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms &
ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public.
However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged
with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to
farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in
their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ?
prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?Q23.
Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes
, enforces it differentially between rich & poor ? why this
differentiation ?Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals
belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia
mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this
number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer
dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia
company stated that all it’s products come with IMEI number only &
stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S
INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their’s as it doesn’t have IMEI
numbers. Further nokia stated they don’t have any business relationship
with either tata indicom or it’s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer
stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but
doesn’t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with
tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating
the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are
without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade
police tracking. What police are doingQ25. Who , of which rank among
police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file “B”
report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in
investigation ?Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel ,
who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the
case can be closed with “B” report or the prosecution fails to prove the
case in court ?Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?Q28.
Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order
acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?Q29. Do you
treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious
big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper ,
adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are
crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic
requirements ?Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG
& IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies
of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore
on same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence
personnel ?Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?Q32.
Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to
certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened
with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their constitutional
duties. But these privileges doesn’t cover the individual actions of
those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax
evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police
department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission
& home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed
ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ?Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people’s representatives are facing criminal charges ?Q36.
In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal
charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually
convicted ?Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports
personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence
agencies ?Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?Q39.
How many MP , MLA , other people’s representatives are wanted by police
in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in
reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?Q44.
How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin
& while they are on foreign tour , from national security
perspective ?Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?Q46.
What is the status of complaint made by former union minister
mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi’s family
received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?Q47. In many
cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that
culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it’s partymen are
withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it’s case
& prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving
shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in
Maharashtra , all the cases against it’s partymen were withdrawn. Are
these type of decisions by government just & legal ?Q48.what
damages has been done to india’s national security due to mole in the
PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?Q49. What action by the government ?Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?Q53.
Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures
, fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts
upon finding them as not guilty ?Q54. Do you register murder charges
/ attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are
responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters & 3rd degree
torture ?Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?Q56.
What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF
personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations ,
3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand
veerappan’s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission
findings ? if not why ?Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my
“fundamental duty” hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI &
GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my
services ?Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of
containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more & even
their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the
government provide insurance coverage to police & their family
members on the lines of defense forces ?Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?Q65.
IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING ,
LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING
ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?Q66. Is the forensic science department
which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the
control of police department ?Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?Q68.
Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings
& subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the
consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly in real
estate matters.Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?Q71.
How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media
about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to
supreme court of India ? since 1947 till dateQ72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?Q74.
are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it
just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge
not allotting him any judicial work ?Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?Q77.
do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted ,
guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?Q78. how ? if not why ?Q79.
how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges
including the wealth in the name of judge’s family members ?Q80. do
all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn
affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?Q83.
when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court ,
what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust
judgement & meating out injustice ?Q84. when allegations of
corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the
accussed – judges are not subjected to tests like “poly graph , lie
detector , brain mapping , etc” , in the interest of justice & truth
?Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are
ineligible to be the members of “Karnataka state government judicial
department house building co-operative society”. Then how come , many
judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this
society & allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for
a few thousands by the said society at said society’s – judicial layout
, yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons ,
clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is
not the whole thing grossly illegal ?Q86. in more than 70% of cases
before all courts in India , central government or state government or
government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family
members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites ,
gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such
allotments illegal ? what action ?Q87. when a person under police
custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not
the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured
person’s case responsible for it ?Q88. has the higher judiciary
legally prosecuted respective judges & the police officers for
committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &
murder ? if not why ?Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions
court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that
court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated
19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected
candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.Q90.
registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures
to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no
: ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list
of selected candidates for the post of peon.Q91. when a person
doesn’t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or
judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person’s
case responsible for it ? what action ?Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?Q93.
numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody ,
for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For
example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him
guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What about the
excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the
illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the
judge in such cases ?Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for
years & finally the judge finds them as innocents & acquits them
of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has
already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust
punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions arising out of misuse of office ?Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their personal actions as individuals ?Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?Q100.
what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as
governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?Q101.
how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste ,
scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women are
their in supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ?
kindly provide specific figures .Q102. what are the legal measures
enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges & to
check corruption in judiciary ?Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?Q104.
does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the
official meetings , parties , at the tax payer’s expense ?Q105. does
any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in
their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?Q106. what
action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges
& newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in
Mysore , Karnataka ?Q107. when common people / tax payers & even
government employees are not getting proper health care from government
at government hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium
health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private
hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payer’s expense ?Q108. are
the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their
health , mental faculties & mental balance in the midst of all work
pressures , emotional tensions ?Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing “amicus curie” in a case ?Q112.
why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an “amicus
curie” in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination case , was not
considered by the court ?Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?Q114.
numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with
supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in
all such cases ?Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the
name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ?
is it not needy person’s rights violation ?Q116. is not the safety
of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both
during hearing of the case & afterwards ?Q117. is the use of
3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody /
judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?Q118. when
the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate
together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation
intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high &
mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?Q119. how
does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government
advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to
ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against rich & mighty ?Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?Q121.
corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial
positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue
officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors
over their quasi-judicial actions ?Q122. subject to conditions , I ,
NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my
free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend
corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ?Q123.
what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme
court of India , through government of india’s on-line grievance system (
DPG & DARPG ) :DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057,
DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 ,
DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 ,
DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 ,
DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 ,
DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 ,
DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 ,
DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 ,
DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 ,
DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 ,
DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 ,
DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pageshttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrwwhat are the status of those appeals ?Q125.
in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing
crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money ,
untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of
judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for
books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round
about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work ,
etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court ,
constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are protecting
the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India & citizens of
India ? please answer.Q126. Is the government giving any facilities /
affirmative actions to policemen’s family as being given to defense
personnel , ex-servicemen & their families , like preferential site
allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission
, soft bank loans , etc ?Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?Q130.what
action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an
innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail ,
finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?Q131. is it not
right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police
personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police failures
& atrocities ?Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a
citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or
naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?Q133.
during british rule in india & various other british colonies ,
criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &
other british colonies. After india’s independence what happened to
those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it
continue with the prosecution ?Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?Q136.
has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it’s colonies , to
face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY
REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?Q.137.
the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me
as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter
no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?Q138 . the honourable
union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti
request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they
transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful
information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got
copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application ,
will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?Q139.
in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have
seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate mr.
I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal ,
totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &
prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you
are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such
advocates in practice ?Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign
origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself
over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she
legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of
the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?

Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the constitution of India?

a) Inside the House b) Outside the House

Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like

Q148.
Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by
the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional
functionaries or equal or below ?

Q149.
Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of
commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court
of records ?

Q150.
Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and
the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and
House of Lords in England ?

Q151.
Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the
House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the
issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?

Q152.
Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to
nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples
representatives & executive ? does not it amount to infringement of
Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.

Q153.
Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than
constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in
importance to it ?

Q154.
Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national
activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil
of official’s secret act & go unaccountable for his actions and go
unpunished by his legal immunity privileges

Q155.
Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme
court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to
codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges
would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal
scrutiny. ?

Q156.
By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the
legislature and Parliament out of tax payer’s money, they get their pay,
perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a
citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or
parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?

Q157.
Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by
voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks
& lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a
citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a
seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (morevalid) in a democracy ?

Q158.
If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill
up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts
provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation
to cover the field (vacuum) ?

Q159.
While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in
his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and
parliament to be judges in their own cause ?

Q160.
Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice
to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?

Q162.
Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public,
as the Public Interest Litigation” ? In some cases, the Public or the
person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case.
Why not free legal aid is given ?.

Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?

Q164.
Communication – free flow of information is the lifeline of a
democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the
Right to Information of Citizens ?Q165. Recently , while assuming
office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR ,
gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries
against approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the
names of accused judges & description of charges against them ?Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.Q169.
Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of
Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of
India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary
inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no
human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived
at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges
facing enquiry ?Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court
found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly ,
entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government
holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court
enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it
find any wrongdoings?Q171. As per law , while on duty a person
should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the
functioning of his senses & brain. That is why the acts &
sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not
taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours
are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects &
produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before
magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also
drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police & judges
work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals ,
apprehending them & to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of
police & judges in drunken state legal ?

Q
172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the
guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union
carbide officials ?

Q
173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials ,
district magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who fully
aided the criminals – Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson to escape law
, to jump bail & flee the country without court’s permission ?

Q
174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with
respect to their contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to
escape ?

Q
175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India ,
who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?
what action has been taken against the CJI who became an official of
the trust belonging to the criminal ?

Q
176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who
decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas
tragedy ?

Q
177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department
& pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties ,
inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?

Q
178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who
decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal
although they don’t have right to do so ?

Q
179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial
court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public
prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept
quite all along and didn’t press for the extradition of the criminal
Mr.Anderson , for producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial
court ?

Q
180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government
officials & people’s representatives who became part of Operation
Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of
thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak
Tragedy?

Q
181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers ,
corrupt labour / pollution control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other VVIPS ,Even after years ?Q
183 don’t the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have
legal jurisdiction to register the case against these VVIPs ? or
just because the criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are not booked
by police? If the said police don’t have legal jurisdiction to book
these VVIPs , they should have transferred the complaint to those
authorities who have jurisdiction & authority to book &
prosecute these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?Q 184 are not
all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of
crimes & criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a crime ?Q
185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL
by courts of justice . however my appeals for justice concerning
public welfare , national security sent through post , e-mail to
supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation ,
why ? does not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals ,
anti nationals?Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of
india together with the jurisdictional police & Revenue district
magistrate responsible to protect the fundamental & human
rights of people ? why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional
Police have failed to protect the fundamental & human rights of
people including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered
at the hands of the criminal nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue
district magistrate & jurisdictional police are together
responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members
or to my dependents the quartet – Honourable Chief Justice of India ,
Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner
of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police
station , mysore will be responsible .

These
corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they also
suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In whose Court
of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is equal , let us
pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing
less nothing more.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1994-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION:

CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282814 for rupees ten only

DATE : 21.06.2014 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

Frazer Town rape: Inspector
arrested for delaying FIR

Pulakeshi Nagar Inspector
Mohammed Rafiq, who has been booked under section 166a of the IPC for failing
to register a rape case in Bangalore’s Frazer Town, has been arrested by
Halasoor Police on Friday.

Assistant Commissioner of
Police (Halasoor Sub division) G.B. Manjunath, who is investigating the case,
questioned Mr. Rafiq for more than tow hours. The Inspector was later let out
on conditional bail.

Mr. Rafiq was accused of
not only delaying the filing of an FIR in the rape case but also allegedly
tried to dilute the issue. The victim brought it to the notice of the City
Police Commissioner, who ordered the Jurisdictional ACP to conduct an inquiry
in this regard.

The preliminary inquiry
revealed that Mr. Rafiq was guilty following which he was kept under
suspension. On Thursday, an FIR was filed against him in the same police
station where he was working.

DSP among six arrested on
charge of deer hunting

Forest Department
authorities on Friday arrested Deputy Superintendent of Police (CID), Mysore,
T.K. Dharmesh and five others for allegedly hunting down a spotted deer in the
Omkara forest range of Bandipur Tiger Reserve. The carcass of the male deer
with a bullet injury was found in Naganapura third block in the forest range,
according to Forest Department sources.

They said the Forest
staff saw the accused in the forest range during routine patrolling early on
Friday and took them into their custody. They later combed the area and found
the deer carcass. Senior Forest officers rushed to the spot on getting the information
and conducted investigation.

“The deer carcass had
entry and exit bullet wound. The post-mortem was performed and the viscera
samples have been preserved,” the sources said. A case under the Wildlife
Protection Act, 1972, has been booked against the accused.

The names of other
accused were given as Manjaiah, Raghu, Hanif, Atiq and Farid.

“A .303 service rifle and
a multi-utility vehicle used for committing the alleged offence have been
seized from the accused,” the sources said.

Forest Department authorities
on Friday arrested Deputy Superintendent of Police (CID), Mysore, T.K. Dharmesh
and five others for allegedly hunting down a spotted deer in the Omkara forest
range of Bandipur Tiger Reserve. The carcass of the male deer with a bullet
injury was found in Naganapura third block in the forest range, according to
Forest Department sources.

They said the Forest
staff saw the accused in the forest range during routine patrolling early on
Friday and took them into their custody. They later combed the area and found
the deer carcass. Senior Forest officers rushed to the spot on getting the
information and conducted investigation.

“The deer carcass had
entry and exit bullet wound. The post-mortem was performed and the viscera
samples have been preserved,” the sources said. A case under the Wildlife
Protection Act, 1972, has been booked against the accused.

The names of other
accused were given as Manjaiah, Raghu, Hanif, Atiq and Farid.

“A .303 service rifle and
a multi-utility vehicle used for committing the alleged offence have been
seized from the accused,” the sources said.

Forest Department
authorities on Friday arrested Deputy Superintendent of Police (CID), Mysore,
T.K. Dharmesh and five others for allegedly hunting down a spotted deer in the
Omkara forest range of Bandipur Tiger Reserve. The carcass of the male deer
with a bullet injury was found in Naganapura third block in the forest range,
according to Forest Department sources.

They said the Forest
staff saw the accused in the forest range during routine patrolling early on
Friday and took them into their custody. They later combed the area and found
the deer carcass. Senior Forest officers rushed to the spot on getting the
information and conducted investigation.

“The deer carcass had
entry and exit bullet wound. The post-mortem was performed and the viscera
samples have been preserved,” the sources said. A case under the Wildlife
Protection Act, 1972, has been booked against the accused.

The names of other
accused were given as Manjaiah, Raghu, Hanif, Atiq and Farid.

“A .303 service rifle and
a multi-utility vehicle used for committing the alleged offence have been
seized from the accused,” the sources said.

Forest Department
authorities on Friday arrested Deputy Superintendent of Police (CID), Mysore,
T.K. Dharmesh and five others for allegedly hunting down a spotted deer in the
Omkara forest range of Bandipur Tiger Reserve. The carcass of the male deer with
a bullet injury was found in Naganapura third block in the forest range,
according to Forest Department sources.

They said the Forest
staff saw the accused in the forest range during routine patrolling early on
Friday and took them into their custody. They later combed the area and found
the deer carcass. Senior Forest officers rushed to the spot on getting the
information and conducted investigation.

“The deer carcass had
entry and exit bullet wound. The post-mortem was performed and the viscera
samples have been preserved,” the sources said. A case under the Wildlife
Protection Act, 1972, has been booked against the accused.

The names of other
accused were given as Manjaiah, Raghu, Hanif, Atiq and Farid.

“A .303 service rifle and
a multi-utility vehicle used for committing the alleged offence have been
seized from the accused,” the sources said.

DACOITY by
Mysore Police - An embarrassment for police top brass

Mysore: Southern Range
IGP's gunman Prakash has reportedly named some senior policemen as his
partners-in-crime in the Rs2-crore seize-swindle scam.
Prakash was thoroughly grilled following his arrest on Tuesday. Sources in the
police said PK Garg, additional director general of police of the CID—it being
the agency probing the case—interrogated Prakash, the gunman serving IGP K
Ramachandra Rao. Sources in the police department did not identify the top cops
Prakash has reportedly named.
Sources in police said that two members of the squad that raided the bus were
not supposed to be there. When intercepted, the bus was in Yelawal police's
jurisdiction, but the police squad had two members working with Bannur police.
Meanwhile, sub-inspector Jagadish and Sathish, who were part of the team that
raided the bus, were arrested when they came to Bangalore to apply for
anticipatory bail.
DG&IGP Lalrokhuma Pachau has asked the CID to leave no stone unturned in
the investigation and to get incriminating evidence against every policeman
involved in the case, regardless of his rank.
Police sources said the CID has obtained the telephonic conversation between
Prakash and the police informants who tipped him off about the bus carrying the
moolah. Sources said Prakash, the informants and the raiding party exchanged
many a call the night the bus was raided and the cash was seized.
The case
On January 4, a police team led by sub-inspector CD Jagadeesh intercepted a
Kerala-bound private bus belonging to Kalpaka travels at Yelwal about 1.30 am,
after receiving information that a huge sum of money was being transported in
it.
They reportedly found Rs2.27 crore in the bus, and took the driver Akthar
Hussein and cleaner Muneer into custody. The bus was first taken to Yelwal
police station and later some policemen asked the driver to park the bus on
Mysore-Bantwal Highway.
The policemen allegedly took six bags of money kept in the bus and dumped one
of them containing cash Rs20 lakh in the tools box of the vehicle.
While the driver denied that he was aware of the money kept in the tool box,
the FIR mentioned that he was illegally carrying cash Rs20 lakh.
After the driver came out on bail, some gold merchants from Kerala accused the
police of swindling their money. They claimed that the money was obtained from
the sale of gold in Bangalore by their local agents. They also claimed that the
money was kept in a secret box located in the middle of the bus floor and that
it was known only to the driver.
The gold merchants also approached Kerala home minister Ramesh Chennithala, who
asked his Karnataka counterpart to look into the matter. Going by the veracity
of the case, the DG & IGP had transferred the investigation to the CID.
Following this, the accused policemen are on the run. Some of them have also
applied for anticipatory bail. The CID has so far arrested four people, including
the gunman of the IGP and three police informants.
The CID sleuths have requested the court to permit them to book a dacoity case
against the accused.

In August 2002, a group led by the then assistant commissioner of police
(Traffic-Vijayanagar), A Belliappa, allegedly robbed the employees of a gold
merchant from Kozhikode of Rs19 lakh. The errant police staff posed as customs
officials and robbed the two employees, who were returning to Kerala in a
private bus. Belliyappa was dismissed for his involvement in the case.
In November 2010, Mico Layout police station inspector CN Janardhan was
suspended for irregularities. He was charged with misusing recovered property.
He had allegedly sold 2.4 kg gold - worth Rs3.45 lakh - that was recovered from
the accused in Muthoot Gold Finance theft case. He was also facing several
other charges.
In January this year, the police inspector of HAL station Rajesh and three
constables were suspended for allegedly extorting Rs3 lakh from an old offender
by threatening to book him in a false case. The errant policemen had extorted
money from Javed, who had complained about it to DCP (South East). A
preliminary internal probe revealed that the policemen had received Rs3 lakh
and had distributed the money among themselves and they were suspended
later. Police are on the lookout for Rajesh.

‘Top cops embolden juniors
in khaki to play it dirty’
Despite being warned by the chief minister and the home minister to not involve
in illegal activities, the Bangalore police personnel, time and again, are
caught for their misdeeds.
A retired police officer, requesting anonymity, said policemen involving in
illegal activities is an old trend. “The nature of the work demands nexus with
people with criminal background to gather information. Ethical policemen use
such information for professional requirements only, but some policemen use
such information for their personal gain. What is disheartening is that some
senior police officers, who have to set an example for their juniors, identify
with such policemen and keep them close,” he said.
“The lower-rung policemen get into direct contact with senior officers by
neglecting hierarchy. The seniors encourage them to involve in illegal
activities and protect them whenever they get into trouble. Making huge money
is the sole objective behind this,” he stated.
“Police are exposed to all kind of criminal activities owing to the nature of
their work. So, they think that they can easily get away by committing some or
the other offence,” another officer said.

The government is learnt to
have returned a file relating to the elevation of a Karnataka High Court judge
as the Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court to the Supreme Court
collegium with a request to reconsider its decision.

The Law Ministry is
understood to have returned the file relating to the elevation of Justice KL
Manjunath as Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court to the Supreme
Court collegium headed by Chief Justice of India Justice RM Lodha.

As per practice, Justice
Lodha had consulted a senior Supreme Court judge who had served in the
Karnataka High Court, on the elevation of Justice Manjunath.

The senior judge had
flagged certain issues in his two-page note to the Supreme Court collegium.

Taking note of the issues
raised by the senior Supreme Court judge, the Law Ministry returned the file to
the collegium with a request to reconsider its recommendation.

As per the Memorandum of
Procedure for appointment of High Court judges, the Chief Justice of India
sends his recommendation for the appointment of a puisne judge of the High
Court as Chief Justice of High Court in consultation with the two senior most judges
of the Supreme Court.

He also ascertains the
views of the seniormost colleague in the Supreme Court who is conversant with
the affairs of the High Court in which the recommendee has been functioning.

If the Supreme Court
collegium sticks to its recommendation, the government will have to approve the
name.

This for the second time
that the NDA government has returned to the Supreme Court collegium file
pertaining to appointment of a judge.

Chief Justice Lodha had
expressed unhappiness at the government's decision to unilaterally segregate
the name of senior lawyer Gopal Subramanium's from three others who were
appointed to the top court.

"I fail to understand
how the appointment to a high constitutional post has been dealt with in a
casual manner. The segregation of Gopal Subramanium's file was done
unilaterally without my knowledge and concurrence which was not proper,"
Justice Lodha had said.

But the government had
defended its decision to return the recommendation of the Supreme Court
collegium saying its move was based on "proper, cogent and sound"
grounds.

The Supreme Court collegium
has reiterated its recommendation to elevate Karnataka High Court judge KL
Manjunath as Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court, turning down the
Centre's advice to reconsider it, say sources.

The Top Court's decision sets the stage for another round of confrontation
between the executive and the judiciary. The Chief Justice of India, R M Lodha
had earlier this month criticized the government for dropping former Solicitor
General Gopal Subramanium's name from the panel of names suggested by the
collegium for appointment as Supreme Court judges.

The latest round of standoff between the two sides arose after the Centre
returned the Supreme Court collegium's recommendation on elevating Justice
Manjunath, the senior-most judge of the Karnataka High Court, and sought clarification
based on complaints against him from a senior judge of the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court Collegium, after examining the complaints, found no merit in
them, and reiterated its recommendation to shift Justice Manjunath as Chief
Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, sources said.

With the Top Court collegium standing firm on its position, the Centre now has
no option but to appoint Justice Manjunath as Chief Justice of the Punjab and
Haryana High Court.

Karnataka
HC judge faces conflict of interest in housing case

A judge of the High Court
of Karnataka is set to hear a case that is likely to impact the fate of a
housing society plot owned by his daughter.

An investigation byThe Hindushows
that K.M. Chaitra, daughter of Justice K.L. Manjunath, was allotted the plot
when she was living with her father and showed his residence as her address.
The allotment appears to put Justice Manjunath in a position of conflict of
interest as he heads a Division Bench that is hearing a public interest
litigation (No. 21860/2011) petition related to allotment of housing society
plots.

The petitioners in this PIL
have questioned a Government Order (GO) passed on November 20, 2010 by the
State BJP government. The GO legalises the allotment of housing society plots
to non-members by admitting them into the cooperative society as associate
members at the time of sale.

Documents accessed by this
newspaper show that Ms. Chaitra was not a member of the Vyalikaval House
Building Cooperative Society and was made an Associate Member at the time of
the allotment of a 5,460 sq. ft plot at Nagawara, an upmarket area on the road
to Bengaluru International Airport.

The sale deed dated
February 8, 2004 shows that the plot was sold to her for Rs. 6.82 lakh. As on
date, the plot is estimated at Rs. 1.63 crore @ Rs. 3,000 per sq. ft.
Meanwhile, hundreds of members who joined the housing society in 1984 continue
to wait for an allotment.

Significantly, the
allotment to Ms. Chaitra was made at a time when she stayed with her father.
This is borne out by the fact that the permanent address, mentioned in the sale
deed, is that of Justice Manjunath. Further, as per the list of assets declared
by the judge, he is the owner of that residence.

Consequently, the allotment
appears to be in violation of Section 10 (a) of the government-framed model
bye-laws for house building cooperative societies, which mandates that an
allottee or her family should not have any other residential property in
Bangalore; the same section also bars multiple allotments.

The very rationale for
cooperative housing societies rests on the premise that they enable persons who
are unable to pay market prices to afford a dwelling unit at subsidised cost.
Indeed, Section 10 (a) was in fact inserted in the bye-laws to ensure that only
genuine and needy persons are allotted sites. It is for this reason that
aspirants were mandatorily required to file affidavits declaring that they do
not own any other residential property in the city. This is done in order to
weed out applicants who do not demonstrate a dire need for a dwelling unit, a
lawyer familiar with the rules said.

Justice Manjunath declined
to comment whenThe Hinducontacted him on Wednesday evening for a response.

Asked for his legal
opinion, Team Anna member and Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan said, “The
[housing cooperative society] plot allotment scam is a huge one in Karnataka.
Justice Manjunath should not hear the case because of conflict of interest. An
application can be filed asking him to recuse himself.”

The Vyalikaval House
Building Cooperative Society Ltd. has been at the centre of controversy over
the past one year.

This is the same society
that allotted a 4,012 sq. ft plot to the wife of retired Supreme Court judge
and former Lokayukta Shivaraj Patil. When the allegedly irregular allotment was
exposed by two newspapers, includingThe Hinduin September 2011, Mr. Patil resigned as the Lokayukta and
returned the controversial plot. Mr. Patil’s post has since been vacant. Two
other judges, nominated to succeed Mr. Patil, withdrew from the race after
details emerged of their own involvement with housing society allotments.

Former High Court judge and
Upalokayukta R. Gururajan too was forced to step down after details of society
plots that had been allotted to him in apparent violation of the law were
published in the media.

Editorial
: Court Fixing not Judgement Fixing alone ?

Throught
this issue , term JUDGE includes all the public officials functioning judicial / quasi judicial
functions right from munsif , taluk magistrate to supreme court judge.
Nowadays political dispensations , powers that be are
appointing unfit persons , persons who are favorable to them to the posts of judges. Government is one of the biggest litigant in
the country & powers that be misusing their constitutional positions
are doing many acts against
the letter & spirit of constitution. Whenever aggrieved persons approach courts of justice , the hand picked persons
of powers that be in the chair of judge will
give favorable judgements / rulings. The said judge will make far fetched interpretations consider outlandish arguments all to favor powers that
be . As a result common people are being meted out injustice even in the
courts of law & public exchequer is cheated of.

Urgent
need of the hour is establishment
of professional , impartial , transparent mechanism for appointment , promotion
, transfer of judges.

This
is the very reason we have raised following questions in RTI appeal to supreme court of india & parliament to clearly define the work practices of it’s members. But they are not answering , because they
will be caught for wrongdoings. Just consider the previous cases of elevation
of P D dinakaran & V gopala gowda.

When asked about why he
waited for 10 years to disclose that an allegedly corrupt judge was allowed to
continue in office in the Madras High Court, Justice Markandey Katju insisted
on NDTV that the "question is not why I did not make this disclosure
earlier, the question is whether what I'm saying is correct or not."

When the interviewer pressed for an explanation about his timing, he pulled out
his earpiece and ended the interview.

Justice Katju, now the chairman of the Press Council of India, was in 2004-5
the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court. He claims that an
Intelligence Bureau investigation sought by him, confirmed the charges, but
that three ex-Chief Justices of India made "improper compromises" by
refusing to end the term of the judge.

Their actions, he said, were the result of political pressure - without naming
the DMK, he said that an ally from Tamil Nadu of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh
warned it would quit the coalition if the judge was removed.

The DMK has denied the allegations with senior leaders saying there was no
truth in it. Party chief M Karunanidhi is expected to respond tomorrow.

The new BJP government said "Manmohan Singh should clarify what was
happening in his regime."

Congress leader HR Bhardwaj, who was the Law Minister at the time, confirmed
that the judge was backed by a large group of MPs who complained about Justice
Katju's opposition.

Justice Katju alleges that Chief Justice RC Lahoti extended the two-year tenure
of the controversial judge. Justice YK Sabharwal allegedly gave the corrupt
judge another term despite an adverse Intelligence report and Justice KG
Balakrishnan confirmed him as permanent judge but transferred him to another
state.

Justice Lahoti told NDTV, "Everything is a matter of record. I have never
done anything wrong in my life." While Justice Balakrishnan, the current
chairman of the National Human Rights Commission said that the judge's
confirmation was cleared by the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, but he
did what he could. "There were allegations that this judge was close
to the ruling party (the DMK) ...so I transferred him to Andhra Pradesh,"
he told NDTV.

The accused judge had reportedly granted bail to DMK chief M Karunanidhi after
his dramatic midnight arrest by the Jayalalithaa government in 2001.

Justice
Lahoti, the former Chief Justice of India, when contacted by some media people
about my statement which was published on my blog and in Times of India
yesterday, generally remarked that he has never done anything wrong in his
life. He has not gone into any specifics, so let me put him some specific
questions :

1. Is it
, or is it not, correct that I first wrote him a letter from Chennai,
stating that there were serious allegations of corruption about an Additional
Judge of Madras High Court, and therefore he ( Justice Lahoti ) should get a
secret intelligence enquiry held against that Additional Judge,and thereafter I
personally met Justice Lahoti at Delhi and again requested for a secret IB
enquiry against the Additional Judge about whom I had received several
complaints, and from several sources, that he was indulging in corruption ?

2. Is
it, or is it not, correct that on my request Justice Lahoti ordered a secret IB
enquiry against that Judge ?

3. Is
it, or is it not correct, that a few weeks after I personally met him in Delhi
and then returned to Chennai, he telephoned me from Delhi ( while I was at
Chennai ) and told me that the IB, after thorough enquiry, gave a report that
indeed the Judge was indulging in corruption ?

4. Is it
, or is it not, correct that after receiving the adverse IB report against the
Additional Judge, Justice Lahoti, who was then Chief Justice of India, called a
meeting of the 3 Judge Supreme Court Collegium, consisting of himself, Justice
Sabarwal, and Justice Ruma Pal, and the 3 Judge Collegium, having perused the
IB report recommended to the Government of India not to extend the 2 year term
of that Additional Judge ?

5. Is it
, or is it not, correct that after that recommendation of the 3 Judge Collegium
of the Supreme Court was sent to the Government of India, he ( Justice Lahoti
), on his own, without consulting his 2 other Supreme Court Collegium
colleagues, wrote a letter to the Government of India asking the Government to
give another 1 year term as Additional Judge to the concerned Judge ?

6. If
indeed the IB reported, after an enquiry, that the Judge was indulging in
corruption, why did he ( Justice Lahoti ) recommend to the Government of India
to give that corrupt Judge another term of 1 year as Additional Judge in the
High Court ?

Some
people have commented about the timing of my statement. What happened was that
some Tamilians had commented on Facebook that I am posting several matters on
my Facebook post, so I should also post some of my experiences in Madras High
Court. Then I started posting about my experiences there, and it was at time I
remembered this experience too, and posted it.

There
was an Additional Judge of the Madras High Court against whom there were
several allegations of corruption. He had been directly appointed as a District
Judge in Tamilnadu, and during his career as District Judge there were as many
as 8 adverse entries against him recorded by various portfolio Judges of the
Madras High Court. But one Acting Chief Justice of Madras High Court by a
single stroke of his pen deleted all those 8 adverse entries, and consequently
he became an Additional Judge of the High Court, and he was on that post when I
came as Chief Justice of Madras High Court in November 2004.
That Judge had the solid support of a very important political leader of
Tamilnadu. I was told that this was because while a District Judge he granted
bail to that political leader.
Since I was getting many reports about his corruption, I requested the Chief
Justice of India, Justice Lahoti, to get a secret IB enquiry made about him. A
few weeks thereafter, while I was in Chennai, I received a call from the
Secretary of the CJI saying that the CJI wanted to talk to me. Justice Lahoti
then came on the line and said that what I had complained about had been found
true. Evidently the IB had found enough material about the Judge's corruption.
Since the 2 year term as Additional Judge of that person was coming to an end I
assumed he would be discontinued as a Judge of the High Court in view of the IB
report. However what actually happened was that he got another 1 year
appointment as an Additional Judge, though 6 other Additional Judges who had
been appointed with him were confirmed and made permanent Judges of the High
Court.
I later learnt how this happened. The Supreme Court Collegium consists of 5
seniormost Judges for recommending names for appointment as a Supreme Court
Judge, and 3 seniormost Judges for dealing with High Courts.
The 3 senior most Judges in the Supreme Court at that time were the Chief
Justice of India, Justice Lahoti, Justice Sabarwal, and Justice Ruma Pal. This
Supreme Court Collegium recommended that in view of the adverse IB report the
Judge should be discontinued as a High Court Judge after his 2 year term was
over, and this recommendation was sent to the Central Government.
The Central Government at that time was the UPA Government. The Congress was no
doubt the largest party in this alliance, but it did not have a majority in the
Lok Sabha, and was dependent on support by it allies. One of such ally was the
party in Tamilnadu which was backing this corrupt Judge. On coming to know of
the recommendation of the 3 Judge Supreme Court Collegium they strongly
objected to it.
The information I got was that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was at that time
leaving for New York to attend the U.N. General Assembly Session. At the Delhi
airport he was told by the Ministers of that party of Tamilnadu ( who were
Congress allies ) that by the time he returns from New York his government
would have fallen as that Tamilnadu party would withdraw support to the UPA (
for not continuing that Additional judge ).
On hearing this Manmohan Singh panicked, but he was told by a senior Congress
minister not to worry, and he would manage everything. That Minister then went
to Justice Lahoti and told him there would be a crisis if that Additional Judge
of Tamilnadu was discontinued. On hearing this Justice Lahoti sent a letter to
the Government of India to give another term of 1 year as additional Judge to
that corrupt Judge, ( I wonder whether he consulted his two Supreme Court
Collegium members ),and it was in these circumstances this corrupt Judge was
given another 1 year term as Additional Judge ( while his 6 batch mates as
Additional Judges were confirmed as permanent Judges ).
The Additional Judge was later given another term as Additional Judge by the
new CJI Justice Sabarwal, and then confirmed as a permanent judge by the next
CJI Justice K.G. Balkrishnan, but transferred to another High Court.I have related all this to show how the system
actually works, whatever it is in theory. In fact in view of the adverse IB
report the Judge should not even have been continued as an Additional Judge

Attempt
to influence HC judge: A Raja named

In further embarrassment to
former Telecom Minister A Raja, the Madras High Court today suspended from the
bar a top lawyer who was allegedly involved in an attempt to influence a judge
taking the name of the minister.

A Division Bench,
comprising Justice F.M.Ibrahim Khalifulla and Justice M.M.Sundaresh, said the
status of R K Chandramohan, a member and subsequently as Chairman of the Bar
Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondichery, shall stand suspended forthwith.

He should not not be
permitted to function as such pending disciplinary action by the Bar Council of
India, the bench said.

Disposing of a petition by
a lawyer, the Bench appended a portion of a letter written by a former judge of
the court Justice S Reghupati, who had reported that Chandramohan had entered
his chamber last year and pleaded that the case of a father and a son, accused
in a marks scandal case in Puducherry, for anticipatory bail be considered
favourably as they were "family friends of a Union Minister by name
Raja".

The lawyer handed over his
mobile phone to the judge saying that the "union minister is on the
line to have a talk with me".

"I discouraged
such conduct of Mr. Chandramohan and told him that the case would be disposed
of in accordance with law, if listed before me," Justice Reghupati had
said in his letter of July 7, 2009 to the then Chief Justice of India.

Justice Reghupati, who has
since retired, had in his letter, complained about the Chandramohan's
"outburst and uncontrollable" behaviour.

Earlier, the judge had in
the open court last year alleged that a Union Minister, through a lawyer,
attempted to speak to him on telephone seeking favours in a case being
investigated by CBI posted the matter to another judge. But he had not not
named the minister.

In his letter to the CJI,
Justice Reghupati had observed that " a counsel, who made an attempt
to exert influence on the court by using the name of a Cabinet minister, cannot
be allowed to succeed in snatching an order in his favour by advancing
threat".

The issue became a raging
controversy that the then CJI had told the media that the judge had sent a
report to him making it clear that no no union minister spoke to him directly.

Justice Reghupati made
those remarks addressing Chandramohan, who was appearing in connection with an
anticipatory bail plea by S Kirub Shridhar, a third year student in a private
medical college in Puducherry, and his doctor-father Krishnamoorthy.

The bail pleas were moved
by Chandramohan on behalf of the two who had been booked by the CBI for
allegedly using the services of a Pondicherry University official and a
middleman to inflate marks to get a medical seat at the time of admission.

Justice Reghupati, in his
letter to the CJI, had observed that Chandramohan made a plea to him that the
court should call for the case diary and hear the case with reference to the
material collected during the course of investigation.

"I have impressed
upon the representing counsel by explicating that a like direction could be
given to the prosecution only in the event of a judge satisfying that such
course is inevitable and absolutely necessary in a given situation and that on
mere demands and as a matter of routine such exercise cannot be undertaken.

"At that time Mr.
Chandramohan stood up and made a similar demand and when I emphatically
declined to accede to his adamant demand, he vociferously remarked that the
Court is always taking sides with the prosecution and not not accepting the
submissions made by the counsel for the accused while giving importance to the
Prosecutor.

"On such pointless
remark, I said that the counsel had engaged to argue on his behalf has made his
submission and he is not not supposed to pass such slanderous and derogatory
remarks," Justice Reghupati had said in his letter.

The lawyer, who had filed
the petition, moved the Court for debarring Chandramohan from continuing as Bar
Council Chairman for his alleged misconduct and order the Bar Council of India
to take disciplinary action against him.

The Bench also said Justice
Reghupathi's letter shall be under the custody of the Registrar General in a
sealed cover which, however, shall be part of the case.

Ex-CJI
was aware of Raja influencing judge: SC Judge

In an embarrassment to
former CJI K G Balakrishnan, Supreme Court Judge H L Gokhale today contradicted
his claim that he was not aware that it was former Union Telecom Minister A
Raja, who had tried to influence a Madras High Court judge in a criminal case.

In a statement, Justice
Gokhale, who was the chief justice of the Madras High Court at that time, said
that in his letter to Justice Balakrishnan, the then CJI, he had clearly
referred to the name of Raja.

Justice Gokhale's statement
totally contradicts Justice Balakrishnan's claim that there was no mention of
any Union Minister in the report sent by Justice Gokhale, then High Court Chief
Justice, on Justice S Reghupathi episode.

"I regret to say that
the allegations are absolutely incorrect," Balakrishan had said last week
referring to news reports that he had suppressed a letter purportedly written
by Justice Reghupathi to him when he was Chief Justice of India.

In a statement today,
Justice Gokhale said, "The former CJI has stated in his press conference
that in my letter I did not mention the name of any Union Minister having
talked to Justice Reghupathi over phone to influence him."

"With respect to this
statement I may point out that Justice Reghupathi's letter was already with him
and in the second paragraph thereof justice Reghupathi had specifically
mentioned the name of Raja.

"I had no personal
knowledge about the incident and observations in my reply wherein are in
conformity with the contents of Justice Reghupathi's," Justice Gokhale
said.

The daughter-in-law of a sitting Andhra Pradesh High Court judge has filed a
dowry harassment complaint against her husband and his family members.
Kavya Rao (30) a resident of Chennai came to the Chennai Police
Commissioner's officer on Wednesday afternoon and filed the formal complaint.
In her complaint Kavya said her father, a Chennai based businessman
arranged her wedding with the High Court judge's son in 2007. She said
during their marriage her parents had paidRs.43.5
lakh as dowry, but the judge and his wife and other relatives demandedRs.50
lakh more. Kavya also said that her husband lost his job in 2008 and
hence they moved from Bangalore to Hyderabad. "Ever since the
harassment began and my in - laws pressurised me to bring in atleast 50 lakhs
rupees immediately"

Kavya in her complaint also
submitted that since her family could not arrange this much money immediately
she was made to starve by her inlaws. But after some time her parents
gave her inlaws money at frequent intervals. When she could not tolerate the
agony she returned to Chennai to live with her parents.

But even after that the
troubles did not end for her , her father-in-law lodged a false complaint
against her father. On the instigations of the judge, abduction and theft
cases were filed against my father she said and added the judge is influencing
the police in Chennai. Her husband came to her house in Chennai a week
ago and ransacked it . Kavya has a small baby girl. In her complaint she said
her husband, mother-in-law and father-in-law are attempting to abduct her
child.

The complaint was filed with
the Additional Commissioner of Police (headquarers) R.S. Nallasivam. It
was later forwarded to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Adayar range for
further investigations. "We have informed the Chief Justice of
India. The AP High Court judge is attempting to influence the local
police here. We will wait for four or five days. If the Police does
not take any action we will move the Madras High Court for direction to the
Chennai Police Commissioner to take suitable action in this regard"
said K.Balu, advocate of Kavya in an interveiw with India Today Online.

In October 2008, The Government of India recommended to the
collegium of the Supreme Court that Justice Ajit Shah of the Delhi High Court
should be elevated to the Supreme Court.

He was not elevated, though the Government tried twice. Judges junior to him
were recommended.

Any idea why? Is it because he allowed the Supreme Court to come within the
ambit of the RTI?

Uday
Lalit to be new Supreme Court judge after Gopal Subramaniam controversy

A day after the Union
Budget 2014 was presented, the Narendra Modi-led National Democratic Alliance
government has zeroed in on Uday Lalit as the new judge of the Supreme Court of
India. Senior lawyer Uday Lalit was also the special prosecutor in the
controversial 2G spectrum case. The development came in after NDA didn’t
support the candidature of former Solicitor-General Gopal Subramaniam’s
appointment as the Supreme Court judge.

Amit Shah, who was
appointed as the Bharatiya Janata Party president on Thursday, July 10, had
earlier availed services of Uday Lalit in two eminent criminal cases. Amit Shah
was accused like murder and conspiracy along with Uday Lalit. Three other
senior High Court judges were suggested by the Supreme Court bench comprising
Rajendra Mal Lodha, Chief Justice of India.

The appointment of Uday
Lalit comes days after the Narendra Modi government refused to support Gopal
Subramaniam as the next Supreme Court judge. Uday Lalit’s appointment also
douses the controversy over Subramaniam’s candidature as an Apex Court judge.

“I’m fully conscious that
my independence as a lawyer is causing apprehensions that I will not toe the
government line. This factor has been decisive in refusing to appoint me,” said
Gopal Subramaniam in his letter to Chief justice of India.

The BJP government rejected
the suggestion of Subramaniam’s appointment and requested the Supreme Court
bench to reconsider it. Subramanian has also alleged that there was a smear
campaign against him and the charges levelled against him were false.

Others who were recommended
for the role were Orissa High Court Chief Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel, senior
advocate Rohinton Nariman, and Calcutta High Court Chief Justice Arun Mishra.

In an assertion that may
pitch the government and the top judiciary head-on, Chief Justice of India RM
Lodha on Tuesday said that the government had acted unilaterally in segregating
the name of former solicitor general Gopal Subramanium from the panel of four
names, recommended by the collegium for appointment as apex court judges.

Chief Justice Lodha made
this disclosure at a function organised to bid farewell to Justice BS
Chauhan, who retired yesterday.

"The segregation (of
Subramanium's name) was unilaterally done by the executive (government) without
my knowledge and consent," Chief Justice Lodha said at the function.

"The first thing I
have taken objection to that the segregation of Subramanium's proposal from
other three proposals unilaterally by the executive without my knowledge and
concurrence was not proper," he said.

The apex court collegium
had recommended four names including that of another former solicitor general
Rohinton Nariman for appointment as judges of the Supreme Court but the
government, while clearing three names, returned the name of Subramanium for
reconsideration by the collegium.

While Chief Justice Lodha
expressed his dismay with the government segregating Subramanium's name and
returning his recommendation, he also expressed regret over Subramanium jumping
the gun and releasing to the media a letter written to him while he was abroad.

He said that he had asked
Subramanium to wait for him to return and deal with the matter.

Chief Justice Lodha said
that soon after reaching Delhi, he had a 75 minute meeting with Subramanium and
asked him to reconsider his letter withdrawing his consent to be a judge of the
top court.

"Subramanium told me
that he would get back the next day but instead he sent a brief letter
expressing his inability to revisit his decision to withdraw the consent"
he said.

"Independence of
judiciary will never be compromised," Chief Justice Lodha assured the
members of the bar present at the function as he referred to the excerpts of
Subramanium's letter wherein the latter had said: "I am, however, unable
to dispel the sense of unease that the judiciary has failed to assert its
independence by respecting the likes and dislikes of the executive."

Describing as
"shocking" the allegation of independence of the judiciary being
compromised, Chief Justice Lodha said that he will not stay in the post even
for a minute if the independence of the judiciary was compromised.

Saying that he was a fierce
upholder of the independence of the judiciary, he said that he had worked for
the institution first as a judge of a high court, then of the apex court and
now as the Chief Justice of India.

Clearly sounding hurt at
fingers being pointed at the independence of judiciary, he said: "For last
more than 20 years, I fought for independence of judiciary and to me this is
one subject which is not negotiable. At no cost, the independence of judiciary
can be allowed to be compromised."

"I will be the first
man to leave this chair...if I know that judiciary's independence has been
compromised. I will not hold my office for a second," he asserted.

Govt
not entitled to judge my character: Gopal Subramanium to CJI

Putting an end to the
ongoing controversy over his nomination by a Supreme Court collegium for the
post of a judge in the apex court, former solicitor general Gopal Subramanium
has withdrawn his candidature.

According to reports, the
senior lawyer withdrew his candidature from the judge's post on Wednesday
following media reports which said the NDA government objecting to his
appointment as a Supreme Court judge, because of his 'links' with corporate
lobbyist Nira Radia and a 'negative' CBI report.

The government is
understood to have returned the recommendation for his appointment to the apex
court to its collegium with a request to reconsider the decision.

Sources in the government
said while returning the recommendation relating to the former Solicitor
General to the collegium headed by Chief Justice of India R M Lodha, the
government cleared the other names for appointment.

Those cleared were Calcutta
High Court Chief Justice Arun Mishra, Orissa High Court Chief Justice Adarsh
Kumar Goel and senior advocate Rohinton Nariman. The warrants of appointments
in these cases are likely to be issued by the Rashtrapati Bhavan shortly, the
sources said.

The government is
learnt to have sent a note to the collegium giving out reasons for its
reservations over appointing Subramanium to the apex court.

As amicus curiae in the
Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, Subramanium was critical of the Gujarat
government headed byNarendra Modiand brought out new facts on the basis of which the Supreme Court
had ordered a CBI probe into the case.

As per the Memorandum of
Procedure relating to the appointment of Supreme Court judges, the government
can return the file for reconsideration once. But if the collegium reiterates
its recommendation, the government has to comply with it.

There is no fixed time
frame for the government to appoint a judge once the recommendation is
reiterated by the collegium. It is very rare that the collegium recommends
names of lawyers to be appointed as Supreme Court judges.

Justice N Santosh Hegde was
the last lawyer to have been elevated directly to the SC. Hegde was appointed
as a judge of the apex court in 1999.

CID chargesheets 6 officials
in KPSC scam

The criminal investigation
department (CID) has filed a chargesheet against six officials of the Karnataka
Public Service Commission (KPSC) in connection with alleged irregularities in
the recruitment of 162 Group-A and 200 Group-B gazetted probationers in 2011.

CID sources said KPSC member Mangala Sridhar and former KPSC secretary Sunder
are yet to be chargesheeted as investigations against them are still on. The
chargesheet was submitted to the 23rd additional city city civil and sessions
judge.

The six officials have been charged under sections 119 (concealing design to
commit offence by a public servant); 166 (disobeyance by public servant); 167
(framing incorrect documents by a public servant); 468 (forgery for the purpose
of cheating); 201(causing disappearance of evidence) and 465 (forgery) read
with 37 (cooperation in committing offence) of the Indian Penal Code.

Some sections under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 have also been
invoked against them.

The CID said they had taken 216 witness accounts while investigating the case,
which was first registered at the Vidhana Soudha police station in January 2013
on complaints from candidates. They accused the KPSC of overlooking them and
allegedly favouring those not qualified in written or oral examinations.

What is the case

The scandalous recruitment scam, nicknamed as the cash-for-jobs racket, was
registered in June last year with Vidhana Soudha police and later referred to
the CID.

The case was filed by the department of personnel and administrative reforms
(DPAR), which forwarded the complaints of Dr Mythri and Ajay G with a note to
register a first information report (FIR).

Legal experts in the directorate of prosecution recommended that a case be
registered. It was then referred to the CID on the director general of police
(DGP)'s recommendation.

The scandal relates to the examination held for 362 gazetted probationers'
posts (KAS Groups A and B) in April-May 2013.

The Supreme Court collegium
is sticking to its decision of elevating the chief justices of the High Courts
of Orissa, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu to the top court, sources have told NDTV.

The collegium had nominated Orissa High Court Chief Justice V Gopala Gowda,
Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Vikramjit Sen and Madras High Court Chief
Justice M Y Eqbal, but the government had asked it to reconsider the names and
also whether the panel had considered allegations against them.

The collegium, comprising of five senior judges and headed by the Chief Justice
of India Altamas Kabir, in its reply to the government reportedly said it has
already considered the allegations raised but was satisfied with the names and
cleared their names for elevation.

The government will now have to approve the names of these three judges as
under the present system, if the collegium sends back the names, then the
government is bound to consider them for elevation.

Indian
Judiciary stands in Cross Road

Indian
Judiciary stands in Cross Road,lawyers in Orissa High
Court comment. Judges in higher judiciary includingSupreme Court of Indiaare now
brought to thetouch
stone of integrityand morale
values.Judges
are human being not the god as we address them in an anglicized words as “My
lord,your lordshipand the
like” and all human instincts are in them as a result of which JusticeA.K.Gangulyhas been
brought under the scanner but that can also be avoided by forming a panel to
examine the truthfulness as that of the panel constituted in the case ofsex
scandalagainst
three judges ofKarnatak
High CourtnamelyJustice N.S.Veerbhadraiah, Justice
ChandrasekhariahandJustice V.Gopal Gowdaby a
committee comprising of Chief Justice of Bombay High Court -Justice
C.K Thakkar,Chief
Justice of Kerala High Court :Justice G.L.Guptaand the then senior judge of Orissa High court :Justice
A.K.Patnaikand the
voice of the people in the country appeared to have beenchockedunder the
threat ofContempt
of Court,but fact remains ,the intellectuals were not happy the manner
,the three judges were given the clean chitby the judges themselves regardless of theexisting investigating mechanismupon whichthe
judiciary ,at the main, rely upon. Once a domain for
particular expertise is devised ,is it at all proper to be ajudge of one’s own cause. The judges brought under
scanning then and for whom entire judiciary in our country was blamed have also
been rewarded with their time to time elevation; and on the other hand, any
judicial member in subordinate judiciary if brought under the threat of any
such allegation are being dispensed with .Umpteen number of instances are
now surfaced. As per opinion survey ,theOdisha
Bulletin Bureauhas
collected the views from intellectuals of different field of expertise, the
judges are in pivotal post of passing the rulings but the efficiency of a judge
now matters and that being so ,selection of the judges ought to be kept away
from the reach of monopolist mechanism of a group ,may it be judiciary or bureaucratic
or the political masters those are always found to be in neck deep
corruption ; and a set of standard of rigorous principle of
selection has to be adopted to prevent unworthy personalities from joining
judiciary embodied with the threat ofRe-Call mechanismandadynastic approachin the
selection of judges should not have direct or indirect influence on the issue
.Now- a-days ,it is invariably seen that judges breeds judges regardless merit
or suitability for the highest constitutional post of the country ; it is also
seen that the children of the judges or the relations, as the case may be ,
practicing in courts are appearing to be loaded with cases from private and
also government agencies meaning thereby that fertility germinates no sooner
one of the family members becomes gets elevation to judgeship. Open corridor
discussion suggests ,relation of many judges in the High Court Judicature of
Orissa have managed to create name ,fame and fortune within shortest tenure of
their practicing law .The theory of uncle judgehas had its vital role in Orissa High Court.

In order to get rid of
public blame and in order to save the image of judiciary ,now hence the judge
selection ought to be done with care and caution ,not by
favoritism.In Orissa ,it is seen, judges elevated to Supreme court are having
lot of tours to the state as that of a politicians more likely as Constituency
Judgeand
are apprehend to have been twisting the selection process and this
has become a common and open scene forOrissa
High Court. Within last couple of months judges from supreme court have made
their recurring and successive visits to the state for this plea or other and
therefore ,public comment on them being theConstituency Judges.

Be you ever so high ,the law
is above you, CJI P. Sadasivam told .In this juncture taking the probing
mechanism to the judiciary itself bye-passing the established mechanism of
probing and / or investigation is nothing but arresting the democracy of the
country,public comment; and therefore,Justice Ganguly be allowed to face the
investigating agency with due regard to his law making process ,not law
breaking when it comes to his person.

Before law ,every body
should be treated equally ,may he beAsharam,Tarun Tejpal,Justice A.K.Ganguly, Justice Altmas
Kabirand the
like .

InOrissa High Court , half a dozen of
judges are alleged to have grabbed land of the govt in concessional rates in
the guise ofdiscretionary
quota,but
nothing happened in spite of best efforts being put from different quarters of
the society and adding few more instances ,it is surprising ,Justice
P.k.Tripathy during his active tenure has unauthorisedly acquired more than one
acres of land in CDA and carried on cultivation by employing staffs of Orissa
High court ,but nothing happened because he was after all a judge and the
person to address on such illegality is also nothing but a judge in fact and in
the closeneighbourhood.Gradually
, the temple of justice is losing the confidence of the people ,bad sign
for the democracy.

Dreaming to have a country
shaping into progressive modernity can be destroyed if judiciary ,last
hope of the common mass, lost to the scanner.

UPA
Lok Ayukta should have clean image: MF Saldanha to governor

Justice Chandrashekaraiah’s
appointment as the second Upa Lok Ayukta has been questioned by Justice MF
Saldanha, also a former judge of the Karnataka high court.

Justice Chandrashekaraiah’s
appointment as the second Upa Lok Ayukta has been questioned by Justice MF
Saldanha, also a former judge of the Karnataka high court.
In a letter written to governor HR Bhardwaj, Justice Saldanha said the highest
standard must be maintained to uphold the institution of the Lok Ayukta.
DNAhas a copy of the letter written by Saldanha to the governor.
Justice Saldanha pointed out that Chandrashekaraiah did not hold a clean
record, and named the controversies that the latter was involved in — including
the infamous Mysore Roost Resort scandal. Saldanha requested the governor to
choose a person with a clean track record for the post of Lok Ayukta.
Chandrashekaraiah was appointed the second Upa Lok Ayukta on January 21, while
the state government and governor Bhardwaj were already engaged in a bitter
battle over the appointment of Lok Ayukta. The governor has thrice rejected the
state government’s recommendation to appoint former Kerala high court Chief
Justice SR Bannurmath as Lok Ayukta of Karnataka.
The second Upa Lok Ayukta’s post had been lying vacant since October, when
Justice R Gururajan resigned citing family and health issues.
Summarising the controversies in which Justice Chandrashekaraiah was involved,
Saldanha alleged that the former was involved in the Roost Resort sex scandal.
Saldanha also cited a case where Chandrashekaraiah was beaten up with slippers
by a schoolmaster, who accused the judge of siding with the accused.
Justice Saldanha said: “The post of Upa Lok Ayukta is very important and
sensitive. The appointee must inspire total confidence and if there is even a
slight blemish in his track record, it would disqualify the candidate.” He
further pointed out that citizens should be informed about the name that has
been recommended and be given enough time to post their objections, if any, to
the government.
“But in the case of Chandrashekaraiah, no one was aware that his name was
recommended and he was sworn in before any material could have been placed
before the appointing authority. Such degree of speed can be damaging,” Justice
Saldanha said.
Speaking to DNA, Justice Saldanha said: “The crucial appointment of Lok Ayukta
is yet to be done. Let the person appointed have a clean and clear track
record. Let not the mistakes made in the appointment for Upa Lok Ayukta be
repeated. The Upa Lok Ayukta appointment was made in a hushed manner.”
DNA, in a series of reports, had pointed out that judges of the Karnataka high
court and Supreme Court were allotted sites by the Karnataka State Judicial
Employees House Building Co-operative Society, in violation of by-laws.
Justice Chandrashekaraiah was also allotted a site when he was the judge of the
high court.
On this issue, Justice MF Saldanha said: “A member of the higher judiciary is a
constitutional functionary and cannot claim to be a judicial employee. He
cannot avail a site meant for an employee and it is bad. This position was held
by the 1995 division bench of the Karnataka high court.” When DNA contacted
Chandrashekaraiah, he hit out at Saldanha and refused to comment on the letter.

After targeting former Chief Justice of India SH Kapadia, Press Council of India (PCI) chairperson Justice Markandey Katju on Monday trained guns at the then Chief Justice of India (CJI) KG Balakrishnan.

Stoking
a fresh controversy, Katju alleged CJI Balakrishnan had pushed for the
elevation of a Madras High Court judge with "bad reputation" to the
Supreme Court.

He
said that the collegium headed by Justice Balakrishnan and also having
Justice Kapadia "almost suceeded" in bringing the judge to the apex
court but lawyers in the south Indian state of Tamil Nadu thwarted it by
producing "voluminous documentary evidence of his corruption."

Justice
K G Balakrishnan, chairman of the National Human Rights Commission
(NHRC), was not immediately available for comments with his office
stating that he is on an official tour to Malaysia and will be back this
weekend.

Katju
had earlier accused Justice Balakrishnan and two other former CJIs of
"improper compromises" in retaining a Tamil Nadu judge under corruption
cloud during United Progressive Alliance rule. Justice Balakrishnan had
dubbed the allegations as baseless.

A
former judge of the Supreme Court, Katju made the fresh claims on his
blog while also reacting to remarks made by Justice Kapadia, in response
to his Sunday's post. Justice Kapadia had said that he had not brought
to Supreme Court any unfit judge.

Katju
also charged three former Chief Justices of India including YK
Sabharwal and KG Balakrishnan of succumbing to the pressure from the
then government headed by Dr. Manmohan Singh.
Katju though did not named the soutern political party for exerting the
pressure, it was a known fact that he was referring to the DMK which
had 18 MPs in the UPA I. The judge in question Justice S. Ashok Kumar
died in 2009.

"I
may remind him (Kapadia) that the Supreme Court collegium, headed by
(then) CJI K G Balakrishnan, and of which Justice Kapadia was a member,
almost succeeded in bringing a totally unfit person into the Supreme
Court," Katju said.

"That
judge was a judge of the Madras High Court when I was Chief Justice
there, so I knew all about his bad reputation. Later, he was made Chief
Justice of another High Court, and was being considered for elevation to
the Supreme court," he further said.

Katju
said that one day during lunch interval, he went to Justice Kapadia's
chamber and told him about the "bad reputation" of that judge, giving
details.

"I
told him that I was not in the Supreme Court collegium, but he was, and
now it was for him to do whatever he thinks proper, and I have done my
duty. There was no use informing Justice Balakrishnan since it was he
who was pushing for the judge's elevation to the Supreme Court," he
wrote.

Katju
further said that after listening to him, Justice Kapadia thanked him
and said that in future also if he has such information it should be
passed on to him.

"Despite
this, the collegium, of which Justice Kapadia was a member, recommended
the name of that judge having questionable integrity, and he would have
definitely been elevated to the Supreme Court but for the Tamil Nadu
lawyers who produced voluminous documentary evidence of his corruption,"
Katju wrote.

Former
Attorney General Soli Sorabjee said the collegium system is not perfect
but attacking it the way it has been by a former SC judge is not
desirable.

"You cannot level personal attacks like this on Chief Justice and some of the other judges," he said responding to Katju's blog.

Former
High Court judge RS Sodhi said the judiciary should not be treated in
this manner. "Don't go around maligning it because you are going to be
undermining the efficacy of the institution. Judiciary cannot be called
corrupt like that."

Senior
advocate Majeed Memon said the faith of the common man in judiciary is
shaking. "We should work together not only to sustain but also enhance
the faith of the people in the system," he said.

Katju
recalled that the judge in question was consequently transferred to a
small High Court, and later impeachment proceedings were brought against
him in Parliament, which lapsed when he resigned.

"So
Justice Kapadia's claim that he did not bring any corrupt judge to the
Supreme Court, has to be qualified by at least one instance where he (or
rather the collegium of which he was a member) almost succeeded," Katju
said.

He
further added that even though he had informed Justice Kapadia about
that "judge's reputation", neither the collegium, nor Justice
Balakrishnan ever consulted him on the matter.

This
was obviously done by Justice Balakrishnan "knowing that if consulted I
would give an adverse report. But why did Justice Kapadia not tell
Justice Balakrishnan to consult me?," he added.

Katju
said that he had later reminded Justice Kapadia that he had informed
him about the "bad reputation" of that judge, but no heed was paid to
his words. I said that the Supreme Court could have been saved so much
embarrassment if my advice had been sought, Katju wrote.

"Justice
Kapadia admitted that I had informed him, but said that Justice
Balakrishnan, the CJI, was adamant, and so the recommendation was made,"
he added.

There
was a Judge in a High Court who had a very bad reputation about his
integrity, and on this account was transferred to Allahabad High Court.
Later with passage of time he became very senior and Acting Chief
Justice of Allahabad High Court.

Some people started demanding that he be made Chief Justice of some High Court, and later brought to the Supreme Court.

The then Chief Justice of India, Justice
Kapadia, had received several complaints about this Judge that even at
Allahabad he was indulging in corruption,and Justice Kapadia requested
me to find out the true facts about that Judge ( I was then a Judge of
the Supreme Court).

At
that time I had to go to Allahabad, my home town for attending a
function, and while there I contacted some lawyers I knew, and got 3
mobile numbers of the agents of this Judge through whom he was taking
money. On returning to Delhi I gave these 3 mobile numbers to Justice
Kapadia, and suggested that he get these numbers tapped through
intelligence agencies.

About
2 months thereafter Justice Kapadia told me that he had done as I had
suggested, and the conversations tapped revealed the corruption of this
Judge.

After
this, Justice Kapadia should have called this Judge to Delhi and asked
for his resignation, failing which he would refer the matter to
Parliament for impeachment, but he did no such thing,(though he did not
allow the Judge to become Chief Justice of any High Court or a Supreme
Court Judge)

Most
Chief Justices of India are reluctant to expose corruption in the
judiciary thinking that this will defame the judiciary, and so they
prefer to bury corruption under the carpet, not realizing that the bulge
under the carpet will show.

Some
think that exposing corruption defames the judiciary. My reply to such
people is : Does corruption by Judges defame the judiciary, or does
exposing such corruption defame it ?

I
may give another example. When I was Acting Chief Justice of Allahabad
High Court I went to Delhi and met Justice Lahoti, the then Chief
Justice of india, and gave him a chit containing names of 5 judges of
Allahabad High Court who were doing shocking things. Justice Lahoti
asked me what should be done ? I replied that if he permitted, I would
solve the problem in 24 hours. He asked, how ?

I
replied that I was going back to Allahabad by the night train, and on
reaching there would call the Registrar General and tell him to
telephone these 5 Judges, and tell them that the Chief Justice had
instructed that they would not be allowed entry into the High Court
premises. Police was being posted at the gate of the High Court with
instruction from me that these judges were not to be allowed entry.
Their chambers had been locked, and they will receive their salary
checks at home, and they need not come to the High Court. I did not want
to see them inside the High Court premises as they had disgraced the
High Court.

When
I said this Justice Lahoti said "Please do not do this, because then
the politicians will get a handle, and then they will set up a National
Judicial Commission". I replied that since he was not permitting me to
do this, i would not, but he may take whatever action he thought fit.

Later some of the 5 judges whose names I gave were transferred to another High Court.

But
is transfer a solution ? Such corrupt judges should be sacked, but this
is not done to ' avoid defaming the judiciary'. I again ask : does
corruption by Judges defame the judiciary, or does exposing such
corruption defame it ?

I have given only two instances of corruption in this post, but I can give several more.

An
additional district and sessions judge in Gwalior, who was heading the
Vishaka committee against sexual harassment, could not save herself from
the prying eyes of a Madhya Pradesh high court judge and had to resign
from judicial service to protect her "dignity, womanhood and
self-esteem".

After practicing law for 15 years in Delhi courts,
she passed the MP Higher Judicial Service exam and was posted in Gwalior
on August 1, 2011. After training under Justice D K Paliwal, she was
posted as additional district and sessions judge in Gwalior in October
2012.

In April 2013, she was appointed chairperson of District
Vishaka Committee. Her annual confidential report of January 2014 termed
her work "excellent and outstanding". But that was not enough. The
administrative judge from Gwalior bench of Madhya Pradesh HC kept
pestering her to visit him in his bungalow alone, she alleged.

In
her complaint to Chief Justice of India R M Lodha and Supreme Court
judges Justices H L Dattu, T S Thakur, Anil R Dave, Dipak Misra and Arun
Misra, as well as the MP HC chief justice, she said the administrative
judge sent her a message through the district registrar to "perform
dance on an item song" at a function in his residence. She avoided the
function on the pretext of her daughter's birthday.

Responding to
her complaint, Justice Lodha said, "This is the only profession where
we refer to our colleagues as brothers and sisters. This is unfortunate.
I will take appropriate action after the complaint is placed before
me."

The very next day of sending a message
to dance in his residence, the administrative judge told her that "he
missed the opportunity of viewing a sexy and beautiful figure dancing on
the floor and that he is desperate to see the same", she alleged.

The
judge got angry when she did not pay heed to his "various advances and
malicious aspirations". She was subjected to intense scrutiny by the
administrative judge. He got more agitated when no fault was found, she
said.

"I started commencing court at 10.30 am instead of 11 am
and extended the working hours in the evening by one hour to 6 pm," she
said but complained that this did not appease the administrative judge,
who continued to harass her.

Tired of harassment, she along with
her husband on June 22 went to meet the administrative judge, who was
"irritated" to find her with her husband and asked her to meet him after
15 days. But even before 15 days could have elapsed, she was served
with a transfer order.

In her complaint, she said, "The
administrative judge, along with district judge and district judge
(inspection), possibly made a false, frivolous, baseless and malicious
reporting to the chief justice of MP and got me transferred on July 8,
in the mid-academic session of my daughters to a remote place Sidhi by
overruling the transfer policy of MP HC."

Her
representation for eight-month extension to allow her daughters complete
the academic session was rejected. Left with no choice, she called on
the administrative judge and pleaded against the abrupt transfer saying
it would affect the studies of her child who was in Class 12.

In
her complaint, she said, "Mockingly, he replied that I faced this
mid-academic session transfer to Sidhi for not fulfilling his
aspirations and for not visiting his bungalow alone even once and he
also threatened me that now he will spoil my career completely and make
sure that I face ruinous prospects all my life."

She claimed the
HC chief justice declined to meet her when she wanted to apprise him of
the situation. "I was left with no option but to resign, so, I resigned
on July 15 in compelling, humiliating and disgraceful circumstances to
save my dignity, womanhood, self-esteem and career of my daughter."

Seeking
justice from the CJI, she said, "Only because the perpetrator is as
powerful as an 'administrative judge' that he can cast an evil eye on
me, and I do not even get a hearing. What system are we following and
leading this democracy to? If this is how a mother, sister and wife can
be treated, who is herself no less than a judicial officer duty-bound to
protect society and law, what constitutional goals are we serving?"

Madhya Pradesh sexual assault on Woman Judge

Cases
of harassment at the workplace have become an everyday affair. But this
time, the victim is not a regular office goer. She is an Additional
District and Sessions Court Judge in Madhya Pradesh. The woman judge
incidentally was also heading the Vishaka Committee against sexual
harassment, but could not save herself from the snooping eyes of a
Madhya Pradesh High Court Judge and had to give up her service to
protect her dignity and self-esteem.As
if this was not enough, the woman Judge was asked to dance to a
Bollywood item song by her harasser. According to reports, the
administrative judge asked her to “perform dance on an item song” at a
function at his home and influenced her transfer to a remote location
despite her requests. However, she excused herself citing her daughter’s
birthday.In
her complaint, she alleged that the High Court Judge also forced her to
visit his bungalow alone, which she never did. The woman Judge was
transferred in the middle of her daughter’s Class 12 academic session.
When she protested, she was told this was happening because she did not
fulfill his aspirations. In her complaint, she said, “Mockingly, he
replied that I faced this mid-academic session transfer to Sidhi for not
fulfilling his aspirations and for not visiting his bungalow alone even
once and he also threatened me that now he will spoil my career
completely and make sure that I face ruinous prospects all my life.”

She
claimed the HC Chief Justice declined to meet her when she wanted to
apprise him of the situation. “I was left with no option but to resign.
So I resigned on July 15 in compelling, humiliating and disgraceful
circumstances to save my dignity, womanhood, self-esteem and career of
my daughter.”In
her compliant to Chief Justice of India RM Lodha and Supreme Court
judges Justices HL Dattu, TS Thakur, Anil R Dave, Dipak Misra and Arun
Misra, as well as the Madhya Pradesh HC Chief Justice, she said, “Only
because the perpetrator is as powerful as an ‘Administrative Judge’ that
he can cast an evil eye on me and I do not even get a hearing. What
system are we following and leading this democracy to? If this is how a
mother, sister and wife can be treated — who is herself no less than a
judicial officer duty-bound to protect society and law — what
Constitutional goals are we serving?”, a Times of India report said.She
further states that the administrative judge, along with district judge
and district judge (inspection), possibly made a false, frivolous,
baseless and malicious reporting to the Chief Justice of MP and got me
transferred on July 8, in the mid-academic session of my daughters to a
remote place Sidhi by overruling the transfer policy of MP HC.”The
Times of India report further quotes Justice Lodha saying, “This is the
only profession where we refer to our colleagues as brothers and
sisters. This is unfortunate. I will take appropriate action after the
complaint is placed before me.”The
victim passed the MP Higher Judicial Service exam and was posted in
Gwalior on August 1, 2011. After training under Justice DK Paliwal, she
was posted as additional district and sessions judge in Gwalior in
October 2012. In April 2013, she was appointed chairperson of District
Vishaka Committee. Her annual confidential report of January 2014 termed
her work “excellent and outstanding”. But that was not enough.It
has been more than a year since the Sexual Harassment of Women at
Workplace Act was passed. But it seems that the Act is powerful only on
the paper and nothing more as several companies fail to implement them.
The vast majority of companies and several establishments are still
trying to figure out what to do. According to the Press Information Bureau of the Government of India,
“The Act will ensure that women are protected against sexual harassment
at all work places, be it in public or private. This will contribute to
realisation of their right to gender equality, life and liberty and
equality in working conditions everywhere. The sense of security at the
workplace will improve women’s participation in work, resulting in their
economic empowerment and inclusive growth.”However,
it is an irony that this case comes at a time when the Central
Government has directed all the State Governments to provide 33 per cent
reservation for women in their police forces to effectively deal with
cases of sexual violence and crime against women. Only time will tell if
this will become a reality soon or not.

Woman says she was attacked at a police station in Uttar Pradesh after going there to seek her husband's release

An Indian woman has said she was gang-raped by four officers at a police station, the latest in a string of sex attacks in the state of Uttar Pradesh.The
woman said she was attacked when she went to the station overnight on
Monday in the Hamirpur district to seek her husband's release."At
11.30pm when there was no one in the room the sub-inspector took me to
his room and raped me inside the police station," the woman told
CNN-IBN.She
filed a complaint with a senior officer on Wednesday over the attack,
which allegedly occurred when she refused to pay a bribe to secure the
release of her husband. Virendra Kumar Shekhar, a police official from
Hamirpur, said: "The procedure will be followed. The victim has filed a
complaint and the guilty will be arrested soon."Sub-inspector Balbir Singh said a criminal case had been lodged against four officers from the station.The case is the latest in a string of rapes and murders in Uttar Pradesh, India's
most populous state, where the chief minister, Akhilesh Yadav, is under
growing political pressure over his handling of law and order.Last
month, two girls, aged 12 and 14, were gang-raped and lynched in their
village. They were attacked after going into a field to relieve
themselves at night because they did not have a lavatory at home.Their families refused
to cut the bodies down from the tree for hours in protest, saying
police had failed to take action against the attackers because the girls
were from a low caste.The prime minister, Narendra Modi, ,
in his first comments on the issue since the hanging of the girls
sparked public outrage, on Wednesday urged all politicians to work
together to protect women. Modi warned politicians against
"politicising rape",
saying they were "playing with the dignity of women" in his first
speech to parliament since sweeping to power at last month's election.India brought in tougher laws last
year against sexual offenders after the fatal gang-rape of a student in
New Delhi in December 2012, but they have failed to stem the tide of
violence against women.Also
on Wednesday, a 45-year-old woman was found hanging from a tree in
Uttar Pradesh. Her family said she had been raped and murdered. A police
officer said five men were being questioned over the incident, which
occurred several kilometres from her home in Bahraich district. "They
[her husband and son] have alleged that the woman, before being strung
up from the tree, was raped and murdered by these men," the district
superintendent Happy Guptan told AFP.

RAPIST Judges & Rapist Police - No punishment ?

When a Judge Himself Commits Crime , When a POLICE Himself robs , Murders ….

In the rape
case of Ms.Nirbhaya committed last year in New Delhi , all the
accussed were from lower middle class background. So , the whole
society , media , police raised voiced against them and the guilty were
rightly prosecuted.

Are not the laws & it’s enforcements fair , equitable , just and same for one & all ?

The
public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding
acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake
it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher
himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if
a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed .
if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his
patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can
be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved.

just
think , if a judge himself that too apex court of the land itself
commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights &
human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their
constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?

it
gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power ,
criminals in public service to commit more crimes. that is exactly what
is happening in india. the educated public must raise to the occasion
& peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalization of
judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF
MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

I have
shown in the following attachment how justice is bought , purchased ,
manipulated in INDIA with actual cases. Just see the recent
examples of supreme court judges involved in sexual assault
case & ROOST Resort Mysore Sex scandal involving judges , if
any ordinary fellow had committed the same crimes he would have been
hauled over the coal fire. Just take another recent example of
Prisoner Movie actor sanjay dutt , TADA provisions were diluted by the
judge to favour him and now he is getting parole week after week
while the ordinary convicts never get a single parole throught their
sentence. What Brilliant Judges , what brilliant police sirji.

Editorial : Hang Rapist Judges to Lamp Posts - JUDGES & SEXUAL CRIMES

At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few public servants

in public service including judiciary & Police. However, the corrupt in public service don’t deserve

respect as individuals – as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the

chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.

All
the following articles / issues , past cases of sexual assaults on
women by judges (hushed up ?) , whole articles published in the weblinks
mentioned

below forms part of this appeal. The term “JUDGE” mentioned throught includes all public

A
midst the rising din of the demand for death penalty for rapists comes
the news that three judges of the Karnataka High Court have been
involved in what has come to be described as a 'sex scandal' on the
outskirts of Mysore at a place called Roost Resorts.Our attention
is now directed to those who dispense justice rather than those who
knock at the doors of justice. In both cases, we are talking about the
use and abuse of women — those who are victims of sexual abuse, and
those who are used as sexual objects, willingly or unwillingly.After
the reports in local newspapers that three high court judges were found
with women at a resort, there was the usual crop of denials. Although
the Mysore police were called in to settle a brawl, on being told that
the persons in question were judges they said that they heard no evil
and saw no evil.And everyone thought the matter ended there.Attempts
to get the names of the judges or of the women in question drew a
blank. The bar association also drew a blank as most people said, "Don't
quote me… but…"On November 30, the Bangalore edition of The Times
of India published a front-page story giving the names and photographs
of the three judges and confirming that the Intelligence Bureau had done
an investigation and come to the conclusion that the incident had
indeed occurred. There were still no details of the incident, though it
was stated that the report has been given to the chief justice of
India.There were reports on the same day that the Karnataka High
Court chief justice had sought the transfer of the three judges to
Patna, Jammu and Kashmir and Guwahati. Apparently, the chief justice has
agreed to this request and the transfer orders have been issued.Then
came the news that the chief justice of India has set up a committee of
inquiry under the 'in-house' procedure consisting of the chief justice
of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the chief justice of the Madras High
Court and the chief justice of the Patna High Court.There were
still no details in the press about the actual incident and the entire
episode continued to be referred to as a 'sex scandal'.What is
interesting about these reports is not what they reveal, but what they
conceal. It is a conspiracy of silence. If the information is now
available to the chief justice of India, why is it not being made
public? Do we, the public, not have the right to information?
Ironically, the morning newspapers brought the news that the Freedom of
Information Act has been passed. What are the legitimate limits of the
right to freedom of information and the requirement of keeping
information a secret? This episode would make an interesting case
study.What exactly is at stake here? There is much that should
concern the nation about the incident. This is not a case about the
private morality of the judges, be that as it may, but about the abuse
of office that they hold. What has not been made known is that the three
women in question are women lawyers practising in their courts.What
is at stake here is the pollution of the stream of justice at its very
source. There must be countless cases in which these women appeared
before these very judges day in and day out of their routine practice.
Can one honestly say that in such a situation justice is being done
"without fear or favour"? Judges swear on oath of allegiance to "bear
true faith" to the Constitution and do justice "without fear or favour".
How well have these judges honoured this oath?What is at stake
here is the cynical use of women as sexual commodities. The usual
justifications have already begun making the rounds. If the women have
not complained, what objection can anyone else have, it is asked. What
is lost sight of is the fact that the judges are in a position of
dominance vis-à-vis the women, in a position to do favours that pertain
to their office.What is at stake here is the cynical use of public
office, the seat of justice, for personal petty gain. It is irrelevant
whether the women consented or not. The usual blame game will now begin —
blaming the victim rather than the perpetrator; the usual loose talk
about the character of the woman in question; the usual attempt to cover
up by diverting attention from the actual incident to the motives of
those who brought the incident to light.What is at stake here is
the perception of women as sexual commodities by those who are
responsible for sitting in judgment over cases brought for and on behalf
of women.The issues at stake here concern one half of Indians.
With what faith can Indian women approach the courts demanding the right
to equality, the right to be free from sexual harassment or rape and
the right to live with dignity, if the persecution of judges who sit in
judgment over them is non-negotiable?In the circumstances, the
suggested solution is worse than the offence — to transfer them to
Patna, Guwahati and Jammu and Kashmir. Why these particular cities? Are
they not an integral part of the country, or are they mere islands
within the country that are considered 'punishment postings' where
people are sent a la 'crossing Kala Pani' of the old days? To the credit
of the Guwahati Bar Association, it protested against the proposed
transfer.The only decent thing to do is for the chief justice of
India to disclose full details of the incident so that rumour-mongering
comes to an end. This would be in the best interest of the judiciary
itself.As things stand, the rumours are making the rounds that
there were more than three judges involved, that the women were
professional call girls, many of which are baseless. We, the people,
have the right to know. The conspiracy of silence must be broken.The
judges in question must neither be assigned any judicial functions
pending an inquiry nor be transferred to sit in judgment over others.
Two of the judges are stated to be additional judges. They must not be
confirmed. If there is prima facie evidence against the one remaining
judge, the chief justice must recommend his impeachment.It is time
for all concerned bar associations, bar councils and other
male-dominated bodies of legal professionals to act and ensure that
there is no cover-up. There is little point in showing sympathy to women
in judgments and in seminar rooms, or in recommending the death penalty
for rape if we cannot deal with the men who dispense justice.There
are contempt of court petitions pending in the Karnataka High Court
against some of the publications for disclosing details of the incident.
Civil society and women's organisations must demand that justice is now
done when it comes to the judges themselves.The law of contempt
can offer no solution to the crisis of credibility in the judiciary that
this incident has thrown up. One positive aspect of the incident is
that it is only after the chief justice of the high court issued a
public notice inviting information that he received 20 representations,
which led to the discovery of the truth.Let the truth now be made public.

New Delhi: A
former law intern, who has made sexual harassment allegations against
Justice Swatanter Kumar, today moved the Supreme Court seeking inquiry
against the retired judge.

A
bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam, before whom the matter was
mentioned for urgent hearing, agreed to take up the case on January 15.

The
intern, in the petition, challenged the apex court's December 5, 2013
full court resolution in which it was decided that no complaint against
its retired judges will be entertained.

The
petitioner also submitted that a proper forum be constituted to conduct
inquiry in such cases and her complaint be also looked into by the apex
court like it was done in the case of sexual harassment allegations
against Justice (retd) A K Ganguly.

The intern has made Justice Kumar, Secretary General of the Supreme Court and Union of India parties in the case.

She
submitted that Justice Kumar was a sitting judge at the time of the
alleged incident and the apex court must look into the complaint as per
Vishaka guidelines.

Justice
Kumar, who is currently heading the National Green Tribunal, has
described the allegations as "incredulous and false" and "some kind of
conspiracy".

IB confirms Mysore Roost Resort sex scandal

The Intelligence Bureau has provided the Centre with a detailed account of the escapade

involving three Karnataka High Court judges on November 3 in a resort on the outskirts of

Mysore, highly placed sources told The Times of India on Friday.

According to a senior official, “Most of the information sought has not only confirmed the veracity

of the incident but the government has crosschecked it with another police agency. Both the

reports match.”

The incident was widely reported in the media. What has surprised the Centre is the “dogged

refusal” of the Karnataka police to confirm the incident. “Mysore Police Commissioner C.

Chandrasekhar first denied that the incident ever took place. Only when a public notice was

issued through the high court registrar seeking information on the Mysore scandal, did the facts

come out in the open. Public protest helped a lot,” says the source.

What transpired at the resort, says the source, “cannot be expected from anyone in civil society,

leave alone persons sworn to upholding the law”. According to him, “The IB report consists of

unmentionable facts and also makes it amply clear that the Mysore incident is not the first time

such things have happened. Can anyone expect upholders of the law to pick a fight with people

who complained to the police when caught in a compromising position?”

In a related development, Karnataka High Court Chief Justice N.K. Jain has written to Chief

Justice of India Justice G.B. Pattanaik asking that three judges be transferred. Jain has proposed

that Justice N.S. Veerabhadraiah be transferred to the Patna High Court, Justice

Chandrasekharaiah to Jammu & Kashmir and Justice V. Gopala Gowda to the Gauhati High

Court.

While Jain is understood not to have given any reasons, highly placed sources say the proposal

for transfers is linked to the Mysore incident.

However, the source says that now the government is worried about the appropriate “remedial

measures”. In such cases, transferring a judge to a remote high court doesn’t always work. He

says, “Bar associations and the people of northeastern states were up in arms when some

judges of the Punjab and Haryana high courts were transferred there. We expect similar protests

if the CJI accepts Justice Jain’s proposal to transfer the three judges of the Karnataka High

Court.”

The Bar Council of India on Friday, while expressing its anguish at the Karnataka incident, called

for “follow-up action”.

“Unless prompt and appropriate action is taken, it will erode the faith of public in the only

institution considered to be the bastion of our fighting faith in democracy,” it said in a statement.

The BCI has “lamented” inaction in this case by “the higher judiciary and the government”.

New
Delhi: A three-member panel that probed the charge of sexual harassment
of a young lawyer by a Supreme Court judge has submitted its report,
identifying the judge as A K Ganguly, court sources said on Friday.

The
report was submitted on Thursday after the committee of three judges
met six times. This is the first time an alleged perpetrator has been
named.

The
report, submitted to Chief Justice P Sathasivam, also carries the
statements of the victim, who interned in the Supreme Court, and that of
the now-retired Justice Ganguly, the sources said.

The
graduate of Kolkata-based National University of Judicial Sciences
(NUJS) had alleged sexual harassment by Ganguly while interning for him
in December 2012.

The
committee, which held six sittings on November 13, 19, 21, 26, and 27,
submitted its report to Chief Justice Sathasivam on November 28.

The victim appeared before the committee on November 19 and was expected to appear again on November 21 but chose to stay away.

She
first mentioned the incident in a blog for Journal of Indian Law and
Society on November 6 and later told the same in an interview with
Legally India website.

The
victim, who is working with Natural Justice: Lawyers for Communities
and Environment, said she heard that there were three other girls
besides her who were sexually harassed by the same judge.

She also claimed to have knowledge of four more girls who were allegedly harassed by other judges in their chambers.

Denying any sexual harassment, Ganguly on Friday said he was “shocked and shattered” by the charges against him.

“I
am denying everything. I have told the committee that all the
allegations levelled by the intern are wrong. I don’t know how such
allegations have been levelled against me,” he said.

“I am a victim of situations,” he told television channels.

“I
am not ashamed of anything,” he said in reply to a question regarding
the alleged episode which came out in public after the victim spoke
about it in the legal portal earlier this month.

He
said the charges against him were totally wrong. The girl had not
raised any sexual harassment issue with him, he said, adding that he had
not done any physical harm to her.

The
former judge said the intern worked with him though she was not
officially allocated to him. She came in the place of another intern who
had gone abroad after marriage. “I never put up a poster. She came on
her own.”

He said the girl had come to his house on a number of occasions in connection with work.

Ruchika Girhotra case: Family gives up fight against ex-Haryana DGP

CHANDIGARH:
The family of Ruchika Girhotra, a minor girl who allegedly committed
suicide after molestation by former Haryana director general of police
(DGP) SPS Rathore, has given up its fight for justice in the court of
law after 22 years.

The special CBI court Panchkula on Friday
accepted the closure report submitted by the Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) in two cases - attempt to murder and forgery of
documents- filed against former Haryana DGP SPS Rathore.

Ruchika's father Subhash and brother Ashu raised no objection to the closure report.

Admitting
that he was not in a position to pursue the matter further, Subhash
said, "I do not see any hope now. We feel cheated. My family is
vulnerable. The circumstances have pushed us back by 20 years."

"When
Rathore was convicted in 2009, I met union home minister P C
Chidambaram who assured me of justice. I thought time and system had
changed and dared to move fresh complaints against Rathore." On January
12, 2010 the CBI registered three fresh FIRs against Rathore - attempt
to murder, abetment to suicide and doctoring of documents. However, in
November 2010, the CBI submitted the closure report in two cases. The
closure report was accepted by the court on Friday.

"But now after finding that the system cannot be changed, we decided not to pursue it further," Girhotra said.

Ruchika's
disillusioned father said that he had presented a lot of material and
some witnesses related to the fresh cases before the agency. "But the
agency was adamant on closing the case."

Subhash forced his son
and family into exile after Ruchika's death, fearing further harassment
at the hands of the former DGP. During this period, the family shifted
between several cities and returned to Panchkula many years later only
to lead an inconspicuous life.

The third case against Rathore-
abetment to suicide - is still pending. The CBI could not file any
report as the Punjab and Haryana high court has ordered status quo on
it. Besides Rathore, former Ambala SP KP Singh, sub-inspector Prem Dutt
and assistant sub-inspectors Jai Narayan and Sewa Singh were also named
in the FIR.

In its closure report, the CBI has said that the
allegations levelled by Subhash Girhotra and his son Ashu against
Rathore were unfounded. The CBI also claimed that the allegations could
not be substantiated "as per the documentary evidence and oral testimony
of witnesses."

The
calls were not getting answered, not a single one of them. The friend
was recounting the tale of a female friend held hostage by some people
in her own house with horror. I was calling the Senior Superintendent of
Police and other officers, district administration, the local police
station. Every passing minute was sending shivers down my spine, he
continued.Worst
was the response of the police station where full rings went with
nobody answering them. What for these police stations are if they cannot
respond to such emergencies? The story, in short, was eerily similar to
countless other stories of bodies of women being turned into the site
of ‘honour’ and battles for the same. The younger brother of the woman
in this case had married a girl out of love and then the couple eloped
for safety. The case did not involve any caste conflicts, ironically, as
both of them belonged to the same caste. It was the girl’s decision to
choose her life partner on her own that had irked the family members,
self-designated custodians of the girl in any patriarchal society. It
was this they wanted to avenge and had, therefore, landed on the woman’s
house in the dead of the night and held her hostage.They
had also confiscated her phones for stopping her from seeking any help.
She was asked to tell where the couple was and threatened with rape and
getting paraded naked if she did not. She, in fact, did not know. Yet,
she asked for her phone on the excuse that a friend might know the
couple’s location and she will ask her. That is how the friend I was
talking to came to know about the incident. She, in turn, tried to
contact every possible person who could help starting with the local
police.As I
said before, the police did not answer the calls even once leaving her
flummoxed. Then she started contacting her friends in media and women’s
movement who could, finally, reach the police and make them act. The
hostage situation was broken next morning after hours long ordeal for
the woman. . Thankfully, she was rescued before getting violated despite
being kept in illegal confinement. That too, it broke because the woman
was well connected and her friend could reach people in positions of
helping What would happen to an ordinary woman with no such contacts is
anybody’s guess.This
happened in a country which saw a national outpouring of anger against
violence against women after brutal gang rape and subsequent death of a
young girl in Delhi last December. The popular protests had shaken the
government of the day into action and it came up with new laws against
rape and promised heightened security for women across India. That the
changes were cosmetic gets betrayed by stories after stories of violence
against women being committed in the country. Uttar Pradesh, most
populous province of the country has been in news for spate of gang
rapes and murders. Madhya Pradesh which has not been in news despite
performing worse is officially acknowledged rape capital of the country.
Even places which were considered safer for women in the past have seen
a rise in incidents of sexual violence. Mumbai, for instance, witnessed
a passenger attacking a female bus conductor and tearing her clothes in
broad daylight.The
new law, evidently, has not worked on the ground. It will not for laws,
however good, need institutions to work and if institution are defunct
and/or deviant they are bound to fail. What law can save a woman if the
police would not do as much as taking a distress call? What law would
save someone from getting raped if she is held hostage for hours in her
own house? What law would save a girl wanting to marry out of her own
choice if the police cannot offer as much as protection to her? The
country has seen cases of Khap Panchayats (caste councils) killing
couple having police protection and then threatening the judge who
sentenced those responsible. Interestingly, the local police did not
beef up the security cover for the judge despite her repeated pleas as
they were hand in gloves with the murderers.Introducing
newer, harsher laws is not going to curb sexual violence in India. Only
thing that can is radical restructuring of the criminal justice system
by making it responsive and responsible. Having dedicated teams to
respond to emergencies might be a beginning but until and unless
impartial investigations ending in speedy convictions become the norm,
nothing will change on the ground.Till then, we can make do police stations which do not respond to distress calls.

Rethinking Rule Of Law In The Times Of Rape Bid On A JudgeBy Samar

An
attempt to rape a judge, that too in Judges’ Compound in Aligarh which
remains under twenty four hour vigil of the Provincial Armed
Constabulary speaks volumes about the status of law and order in Uttar
Pradesh, the most populous state of India. Who will be safe on the
streets when even a judge is not spared by the rapists? No one, in fact
is, as evidenced by the recent spate of incidents of sexual violence
against women from marginalised and dispossessed backgrounds. The
gruesome gang rape and murder of two minors in Badaun, the most ghastly
of them, has caused a national outrage just a few days before this
incident. The brazen attack on the mother of a rape survivor in order to
force her to withdraw the complaint against the accused, currently in
jail, in nearby Etah was another glaring example of total collapse of
rule of law in Uttar Pradesh.Sadly,
the state has never been known for maintaining even law and order,
forget enforcing rule of law. It has rather had the dubious distinction
of being the proverbial Bad Lands, the countryside run by might and not
by rulebooks. With both political and bureaucratic leadership
oscillating between the denial to dodging mode, the recent cases of
sexual assaults have merely reinforced the image. Think of a Chief
Minister saying that rapes were common and a Google search would return
many “Badaun like incidents’. Think of his father, a former chief
minister and current parliamentarian, terming rape as minor mistake. The
Director General of Police of the state, however, took the crown by
justifying the incidents of rape as ‘normal’ in a state of the size and
population of Uttar Pradesh.There
were others, largely in the secular liberal intelligentsia of the
country, who saw a political conspiracy hatched by the Hindu right
behind defaming the state. They came up, rightly, with the data from the
National Crime Records Bureau that shows Madhya Pradesh as the rape
capital of India and raised questions over the undue scrutiny of Uttar
Pradesh. The intelligentsia, unfortunately, seems to have got it wrong
once again, first time being its silence on the cases where victims came
from dispossessed and marginalised communities. The lack of outrage
over sexual violence against women from Dalit, tribal, minorities and
other such communities until the cases are really gory, as Badaun was,
has led to a section of people losing faith in them, it would do better
not to lose all.The
question, however, is if the failure of a state in providing security
to its women can be used as an excuse to defend the total collapse of
rule of law in another? Should not a single case of rape be horrifying
enough for the state to wake up and fix the system? Can a state really
take refuge in competitive statistics and shirk from its responsibility
of maintaining law and order, at least? This is exactly where that the
government of Uttar Pradesh has failed and failed absolutely. That’s not
bizarre if one sees the number of criminals in it right from its ranks
and files to the ministry. After all, the state has a dubious
distinction of seeking the withdrawal of rape charges against a minister
in ‘public interest’.It
is in this context that the rape attempt on a sitting judge must be
seen as a wakeup call for both the citizenry and the state. No people
can live in perpetual fear of violence against women and state's
inaction will merely increase both vigilantism and control of the
mobility of women in the name of safety, a dangerous thing for a
democracy. Parrying away the questions over the state of governance in
Uttar Pradesh is not going to serve any purpose, only bringing the
criminals to justice will. The state government must ensure speedy and
impartial justice to the victims and their families to restore their
faith in the system.

Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion
of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye
Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at
the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore
Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to
the needy.

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief.If
i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of
investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages ,
transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly
the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer
of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the
guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station
for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of
one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating
agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members
like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives ,
death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police
together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be
responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police
file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this
complaint is & will be effective.

If
I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental
rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If
anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or
to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together
with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be
responsible for it , in
such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated
by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to
Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by
GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty
police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional
fuctionaries. date : 08.10.2014…………………………..Your's sincerely,