In an extraordinary rebuke of judicial redress, Clinton appointed Judge Denise Cote tried to dismiss our lawsuit against New York City’s ban against protests. I have filed many a free speech lawsuit against various municipalities including New York and never before did I see a judge schedule our hearing almost immediately and try to dismiss it just as quickly – without even giving us an opportunity to present our case. This is a glaring example of how decayed and corrupt the New York political system is.

We filed our appeal Monday and today filed an emergency motion for injunction pending appeal…essentially asking the Second Circuit to do what the lower court would not.

Federal Appeals Court Asked to Stop Mayor de Blasio’s Tyranny

(New York – May 21, 2020) – Late yesterday, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), a national public interest law firm, filed an emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit against New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and his police commissioner.

The AFLC-filed motion asks the federal appellate court to immediately reverse Judge Denise Cote’s recent order refusing to issue an immediate injunction forbidding Mayor de Blasio and the New York City Police Department from preventing public group protests in the City.

The underlying lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of political activist Pamela Geller, challenges Mayor de Blasio’s recent announcement that, pursuant to his executive orders, the First Amendment no longer applies in the City of New York as he has made it unlawful to peaceably assemble and protest.

Immediately after filing the lawsuit, AFLC filed a motion seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to permit organized public protests that abide by social distancing and face mask requirements. Oral argument was heard on that motion last Friday via videoconferencing, but the judge refused to grant the injunction. On Monday, the judge issued her order denying the TRO and entered a final judgment dismissing the lawsuit so AFLC could file an expedited appeal on behalf of Ms. Geller.

Ms. Geller is an author, a conservative blogger, and champion for the First Amendment. In addition to successfully challenging government restrictions on free speech in New York, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, and Seattle, she organized the successful public protest of the Ground Zero mosque construction in Lower Manhattan.

But for Mayor de Blasio’s suspension of the First Amendment, Ms. Geller would organize and participate in a public protest of de Blasio’s anti-Jewish bias and against his policies, including the draconian restrictions he has imposed upon fundamental liberties during the COVID-19 pandemic.

De Blasio and the police commissioner have taken the position in this lawsuit that individuals acting alone may protest in public. What they cannot do, even if they are careful to observe social distancing requirements, is protest as an organized group. This, of course, renders the protest of one meaningless. Not surprisingly, it is evident that Mayor de Blasio wants to silence effective protests against his irrational and tyrannical edits.

As set forth in the motion papers filed in the Court of Appeals yesterday:

“Defendants’ assertion that organized public protests are more harmful than other permitted activity (i.e., if the same number of people are incidentally on the public streets and sidewalks at the same time cycling, walking their dogs, or even protesting as individuals) is not based on any hard facts or science. Rather, it is based on speculation. For example, Defendants speculate that protestors will be ‘chanting and yelling,’ which will then cause a greater spread of respiratory droplets. But Plaintiff never claimed she was planning a ‘chanting and yelling’ protest. Even if a group protest called for chanting and the like, are individual protestors acting independently of one another less likely to chant and yell? Do Defendants demand silence from all those who go out in public? Anyone involved in sponsoring protests or policing them knows that an organized protest is more likely to maintain the requisite etiquette than a large number of independent protestors. And moving beyond protestors, do joggers and others exercising strenuously in public not present a similar likelihood of heavy breathing and expectorating? In stark contrast to Defendants’ naked claims of the risk posed by group protests, Plaintiff’s protest will involve the use of signs, particularly since the protestors will be wearing masks, which makes it impractical, if not impossible, to chant or yell.”

AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel David Yerushalmi commented:

“Mayor de Blasio and his police commissioner have decided to criminalize effective organized public protest by claiming it is a public health risk. This is a classic authoritarian power grab and precisely one the Constitution does not permit. The lower court simply acquiesced to the Mayor’s parade of horribles, turning its back on the First Amendment. We are hopeful the federal Court of Appeals will take a more judicious and penetrating look at the actual evidence and apply a modicum of logic and commonsense.”

AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel Robert Muise added:

“This pandemic has exposed the true desire of progressive liberals to be tyrants. Conservative-led Red States are opening and progressive-led Blue States are shut down like Communist China. Ever since our founding, America has rejected tyranny and refused to abide by a king. Today, more than ever in my lifetime, our resolve for freedom is being tested. As Patrick Henry famously stated, ‘I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!’ We too must have the resolve of our Founders to reject this new tyranny which has risen from the shadows of this pandemic.”

The parties have agreed to an expedited briefing schedule with final papers to be filed no later than Friday, May 29, 2020.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Fund The Fight

books & Movies

By Pamela Geller

It is the conflict of our age, yet no one dares talk about it. The true story of the Islamic Supremacist war on free speech as told by those on the front lines fighting for our First Amendment rights,
.

Pamela Geller tells her own story of how she became one of the world's foremost activists for the freedom of speech,
individual rights, and equality of rights for all. "It's my story, it's what happens when someone fights for freedom in America today,"
Geller explained.

Today Islamic supremacists are demanding more accommodation of Islamic principles
and practices than ever, and daily growing more aggressive in eroding our freedoms – with politically
correct public officials only too happy..