The continuous continuousness of DevOps

Defining DevOps is getting easier, but it’s still an elusive goal. Part of the challenge is that DevOps is more of a culture than a specific “thing” and how that culture exists is subjective and varies from one organization to the next. DevOps is what you want or need DevOps to be to some extent, but one thing seems to be consistent no matter how you define DevOps—it’s continuous.

If DevOps is the buzzword du jour for tech, then continuous is the buzzword du jour of DevOps. Everything is continuous. Continuous development and continuous testing lead to continuous deployment and continuous delivery, which requires continuous support. Continuous monitoring produces continuous integration and continuous change. Continuous security results in continuous incident response…or vice versa. To top it off, all of the continuous activities continuously feed each other to drive more continuousness in some sort of DevOps Mobius strip of continuity.

What does it all mean? I mean, aside from being a catchy buzzword and making that new DevOps tool or service sound sexy and impressive?

In a nutshell it means there’s no end. You don’t really reach a point where everyone can shut down their PCs and grab a beer to celebrate the completion of the project. The project—whatever it is—is more of a living, evolving thing than a deliverable.

There’s also no beginning—or at least no new beginning. All of the continuous activities cycle back over each other like a Spirograph drawing. Have you ever tried to find the beginning or end of a Spirograph drawing? Good luck.

When you strip out the buzzwords what it really means is working in a more effective and efficient way. I’ve worked on software development projects the old-fashioned way. No, not Agile—Waterfall. The cascading tasks feed each other in what appears to be a logical progression. It makes sense to define requirements, design the software, implement it, test or verify it, and then kick back and go into maintenance mode…on paper at least.

In the real world new requirements are discovered when you’re ready to implement, and testing results in new design elements. Those new requirements need to be designed and the new design element needs to be implemented and it all needs to be tested and maintained which inevitably creates new requirements, design elements, and so on.

Waterfall was already DevOps—it was just dysfunctional because each “continuous” loop was treated as a unique and separate project. Items that were identified after the design phase were just accumulated on a list to be incorporated into the next phase or iteration. The net result was producing a somewhat stable product that you already knew was flawed, but that you’d get to fixing eventually.

Agile development accelerated some of the feedback loops of Waterfall and resulted in faster refinements to projects, but it still had issues. The primary issue is that developers can’t go faster by themselves. Developers are just one cog in the machine and producing software faster just creates a bottleneck if operations isn’t prepared and the infrastructure isn’t ready to handle it.

Chris Riley explained the challenge of Agile. “However, the Ops department was inherently left behind with deployments piling up faster than they could be released and customers never actually received the value they demanded. This trend ultimately gave rise to DevOps, a new-age version of Agile methodology encompassing the Dev and Ops segment to enable service delivery agility and quality.”

Another way of looking at it is that DevOps is an evolution of Agile. I wrote recently, “DevOps is just a natural extension of Agile. It takes the guiding principles and best practices that Agile brought to developers and applies them on a much broader scale across the organization.”

So now everything is continuous. There is no top of the waterfall that cascades through multiple layers until you reach the bottom of the waterfall. Now there’s a continuous culture of continuity. It may sound confusing when viewed through all of the various buzzwords, but when you step back it makes sense. It makes sense because that’s really the way it worked—or should have worked—all along.

DevOps gets processes and policies out of the way to enable people to get things done more efficiently. For some reason we’ve decided that every element should be labeled continuous—which actually makes it sound a little frenetic or overwhelming. Maybe we should use “efficient” instead. That can be our new buzzword.

A survey of 477 of IT professionals working in organizations that have mainframes conducted by DevOps.com on behalf of CA Technologies finds over half describe their transition to DevOps as being a “work in progress.” CA Technologies enables customers extend Agile and DevOps practices to mainframe by helping them adopt ... Read More

Our website uses cookies. By continuing to browse the website you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more information on how we use cookies and how you can disable them, please read our Privacy Policy.