Then why don't you just go back to Windows?
[color=blue]
>
> Newbies are stuck with Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS, or even Mint. Choice is
> limited. LOLOL. Like, the distro's all don't have the same freaking
> thing. They just all fix bugs.[/color]

So you are saying bug fixes are bad?
[color=blue]
>
> Maybe, these guys could work together to get a good release out?[/color]

And why are the current releases of PCLinuxOS, Red Hat, Suse, Mandriva,
etc not "good releases?

NAAAA[color=blue]
> I think they want to be the next microsoft.
>
> I can hope that they can just have one universal GOOD hardware
> installer, instead of everybody rolling their own?
> I can hope.
>
> [url]http://techreview.uni.cc/osreviews/opensuse_11.0_review[/url]
>
> Meanwhile, everybody rolls their own.[/color]

Is is called distro differentiation.

--
Rick

07-09-2008, 02:42 PM

unix

Re: suse and fedora

On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:40:05 -0500, Rick wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:42:04 -0700, Psyc Geek (TAB) wrote:
>[color=green]
>> This review does not look pretty. But then again, neither does Fedora.[/color]
>
> Then why don't you just go back to Windows?
>[color=green]
>>
>> Newbies are stuck with Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS, or even Mint. Choice is
>> limited. LOLOL. Like, the distro's all don't have the same freaking
>> thing. They just all fix bugs.[/color]
>
> So you are saying bug fixes are bad?
>[color=green]
>>
>> Maybe, these guys could work together to get a good release out?[/color]
>
> And why are the current releases of PCLinuxOS, Red Hat, Suse, Mandriva,
> etc not "good releases?
>
> NAAAA[color=green]
>> I think they want to be the next microsoft.
>>
>> I can hope that they can just have one universal GOOD hardware
>> installer, instead of everybody rolling their own?
>> I can hope.
>>
>> [url]http://techreview.uni.cc/osreviews/opensuse_11.0_review[/url]
>>
>> Meanwhile, everybody rolls their own.[/color]
>
> Is is called distro differentiation.[/color]

It's called fragmentation and mass confusion.

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
[url]http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/[/url]

07-09-2008, 02:53 PM

unix

Re: suse and fedora

On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:42:18 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:40:05 -0500, Rick wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:42:04 -0700, Psyc Geek (TAB) wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> This review does not look pretty. But then again, neither does
>>> Fedora.[/color]
>>
>> Then why don't you just go back to Windows?
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Newbies are stuck with Ubuntu or PCLinuxOS, or even Mint. Choice is
>>> limited. LOLOL. Like, the distro's all don't have the same freaking
>>> thing. They just all fix bugs.[/color]
>>
>> So you are saying bug fixes are bad?
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Maybe, these guys could work together to get a good release out?[/color]
>>
>> And why are the current releases of PCLinuxOS, Red Hat, Suse, Mandriva,
>> etc not "good releases?
>>
>> NAAAA[color=darkred]
>>> I think they want to be the next microsoft.
>>>
>>> I can hope that they can just have one universal GOOD hardware
>>> installer, instead of everybody rolling their own? I can hope.
>>>
>>> [url]http://techreview.uni.cc/osreviews/opensuse_11.0_review[/url]
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, everybody rolls their own.[/color]
>>
>> Is is called distro differentiation.[/color]
>
> It's called fragmentation and mass confusion.[/color]

I am not confused. Red Hat customers are not confused. Suse customers are
not confused.