It seems Batman: Arkham City will not use Games for Windows LIVE, after all, as GreenManGaming tweets: "We've just received notice from Warner's that Batman is Games for Windows but NOT a Games for Windows 'Live' title!" The box art for the stealth/action sequel was revealed in June showing the GFWL logo, suggesting the game would use Microsoft's service, like Batman: Arkham Asylum did. Thanks Eurogamer.

^Drag0n^ wrote on Aug 28, 2011, 10:03:Sorry, Krovven, but I'd have to agree with El Pit on this. If a PC and an Xbox can run the exact same game, and, let's be honest here..

I'm not debating anything to do with consoles vs pc's. If you read, the debate is about using a gamepad on my pc from the comfort of a couch, for the games that are best suited for gamepads.

The point I've been making is there is no reason for me to have a 360 at all, when I can play those same games on my PC using a gamepad. El Pit suggests that those games that require a gamepad shouldnt even be on a PC, they should stay on consoles.

Arkham City imo, is one of those games. It's great that the m/k controls are good, but using a gamepad for a fighting game is just better. Being able to sit on my couch, with 1080 graphics, using a gamepad on the pc version is going to win everytime over getting a game like this for my PS3. And yes anyoen that wants to tell me I'm wrong, that gamepad games don't belong on PC's...I am simply going to refer to them as idiots, especially when their reasonings make no sense and contradict themselves.