NARAL reeling from Obama endorsement

With the clock running down on a long-fought primary, NARAL Pro-Choice America leaders sent state affiliates reeling this week by endorsing Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois. It was seen as a gratuitous slap in the face to a longtime ally, and it sparked a fear even closer to home: that the move will alienate donors loyal to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

Many on this week’s conference call were stunned on learning the news, making urgent pleas for the group to remain neutral until after the June 3 Democratic primaries.

Story Continued Below

“It’s created a firestorm,” said NARAL Pro-Choice New York President Kelli Conlin, who was on the conference call. “Everyone was mystified ... saying, ‘What is the upside for the organization? And, frankly, [there was] a lot of concern about the donor base. ... There was real concern there would be a backlash.” There was a backlash, and it was swift, starting with NARAL’s own website. At last count, there were more than 3,300 comments in an electronic chat about the endorsement, the overwhelming majority of them negative. “Shame shame shame!” read one, with many correspondents threatening never to support NARAL financially again. “No more donations from me!!!” wrote another.

In Washington, two dozen women members of Congress who support Clinton held a quickly organized press conference to tout her abortion-rights record Wednesday night. Ellen Malcolm, founder of the abortion-rights women’s fundraising group EMILY’s List, sharply rebuked NARAL for its endorsement. Two former members of Congress (and Clinton supporters) — Geraldine Ferraro and Pat Schroeder — jabbed at NARAL for endorsing before the general election. “Looks like some higher ups at NARAL are trying to get jobs in the new administration ... nothing else makes sense to us,” they wrote in a joint letter.

A number of feminist donors — including several Obama supporters — were shaking their heads at the timing, said a source who has worked on women’s health and reproductive rights issues for 25 years and meets routinely with top contributors to the cause. “Without exception, the response was, 'It’s a really stupid thing to do,'” said the source.

And even former NARAL Pro-Choice America President Kate Michelman, who is working on behalf of Obama, was taken by surprise, saying she learned of the endorsement only when a reporter called her. Although she wouldn’t comment on the timing, she was clearly worried about damage to the larger cause of women’s rights. “I don’t think there’s any question that there are strong Obama supporters who are pro-choice who are surprised by the decision, and probably some are upset by the decision, because NARAL’s mission is of course to protect women’s liberty — especially reproductive rights, but women’s liberty in general.”

Things moved equally fast at the grass-roots level. A day after the endorsement, Laura Taylor, political director of NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon, had heard from more than 100 people, including some from out of state. “They’re frustrated; they’re angry; they don’t understand why this decision was made or why it was now,” she said. (Oregon’s Democratic primary is next Tuesday; Obama enjoys a 14 percent lead, according to the RealClearPolitics average.)

See Also

Taylor, Conlin and their counterparts in eight of NARAL’s 25 state affiliates — Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Texas, Oregon and Washington — posted statements on their websites rejecting the national endorsement. They explain that the state affiliates will remain neutral until the general election and that the national endorsement was made without consulting the state affiliates.

“Since we posted [it], we’ve gotten pretty good response from people saying they’ll support the Oregon affiliate but not national,” Taylor said. “I think people recognize the fact that [the endorsement] was not done in consultation with any of the affiliates, and we were as stunned to hear about it as anyone else.”

NARAL officials in Washington didn’t consult with state affiliates because they are prohibited from doing so by federal law, explained Beth Shipp, NARAL’s national political director. “I appreciate why some of the affiliates were upset by the endorsement, but legally we can’t coordinate or consult with them about federal endorsements,” she said.