To link to the entire object, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed the entire object, paste this HTML in websiteTo link to this page, paste this link in email, IM or documentTo embed this page, paste this HTML in website

North Carolina Board for Licensing of Geologists
N E W S L E T T E R
Wi n t e r 2 0 1 0 • P. O . B o x 4 1 2 2 5 • R a l e i g h , N o r t h C a r o l i n a 2 7 6 2 9 • 9 1 9 - 8 5 0 - 9 6 6 9 • n c b l g @ b e l l s o u t h . n e t
Rules of Professional Conduct
The Licensing Board reminds each licensee that it is his/her responsibility to read, understand, and
follow the Rules of Professional Conduct for Geologists. These rules are presented in section 0.1100
of 21 NCAC 21 and can be accessed through the NCBLG website. The Board has also decided to
print the Rules in their entirety in installments in four consecutive newsletters.
In this second installment, sections .1101 (d), (e), and (f) are presented. Section (d) charges each
licensee to issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner. Section (e) charges
each licensee not to supplant another licensee once they are selected in an employment situation.
Section (f) charges each licensee to avoid conflicts of interest. Each section is presented in its
entirety below.
21 NCAC 21 .1101 RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT (continued)
(d) The geologist shall issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner:
1. The geologist shall be completely objective and truthful in all professional reports, statements,
or testimony. He shall include all relevant and pertinent information in such reports, statements or
testimony.
2. The geologist when serving as an expert or technical witness before any court, commission, or
other tribunal shall express an opinion only when it is founded upon adequate knowledge of the
facts in issue, upon a background of technical competence in the subject matter, and upon honest
conviction of the accuracy and propriety of his testimony.
3. The geologist will issue no statements, criticisms, or arguments on geologic matters connected with
public policy which are inspired or paid for by an interested party or parties unless he has prefaced
his comments by explicitly identifying himself, by disclosing the identities of the party or parties on
whose behalf he is speaking, and by revealing the existence of any pecuniary interest he may have
in the instant matters.
4. The geologist shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional
reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of another geologist, nor shall he maliciously criticize
another geologist’s work in public. If he believes that another geologist is guilty of misconduct or
illegal practice, he shall present such information to the Board for action.
(e) The geologist shall not attempt to supplant another geologist in a particular employment after
becoming aware that the other has been selected for the employment.
(f) The geologist shall avoid conflicts of interest:
1. The geologist shall conscientiously avoid conflicts of interest with his employer or client, but when
unavoidable, the geologist shall forthwith disclose the circumstances to his employer or client.
2. The geologist shall avoid all known conflicts of interest with his employer or client, and shall
promptly inform his employer or client of any business association, interest, or circumstances which
could influence his judgment or the quality of his services.
3. The geologist shall not accept compensation, financial or otherwise, from more than one party for
services on the same project, or for services pertaining to the same project, unless the circumstances
are fully disclosed to, and agreed to, by all those parties.
4. The geologist shall not solicit or accept financial or other valuable considerations from material or
equipment suppliers for specifying their products.
5. The geologist shall not solicit or accept substantial gratuities, directly or indirectly, from contrac-tors,
their agents, or other parties dealing with his client or employer in connection with work for
which he is responsible.
6. When in public service as a member, advisor, or employee of a governmental body or department,
the geologist shall not participate in considerations or actions with respect to services provided by
him or his organization in private geological practices.
7. The geologist shall not solicit or accept a geologic contract from a governmental body on which
a principal or officer of his business serves as a member.
Chairman’s
Message
As the Academic Board Member, I want to iden-tify
two items that are of importance to me. The
first concerns the Board’s stance on continuing
education for our licensees. NCBLG does not
require our licensees to complete continuing
education credits to maintain their professional
license. However, the Board expects that
each licensee understands the importance of
continuing education in staying up-to-date in
your area of expertise. Educational activities
are excellent opportunities to support or expand
your experience in your area(s) of expertise.
Section 1101-2C of the Rules of Professional
Conduct (21 NCAC 21), which was reproduced
in the Fall 2009 Board Newsletter, addresses
the importance of education. That section
states that:
“The geologist shall undertake to perform
geologic assignments only when qualified by
education or experience in the specific techni-cal
field of geology involved”, and
“The geologist shall not affix his signature and
seal to any document dealing with subject
matter for which he lacks competence by
virtue of education or experience….or docu-ment
not prepared under his direct supervisory
control…”.
While these statements include the words
“education or experience” not “education and
experience”, the Board generally does not view
education, without experience, as sufficient to
qualify someone as being proficient in an area
of expertise. Education alone is generally not
sufficient to produce a work product that would
protect the safety, health, and welfare of the
public. Yet, it is the view of the Board that
successful completion of continuing education
courses can support and expand the licensee’s
experience in their area(s) of expertise, result-ing
in a superior work product that serves to
protect the public.
The second item I want to point out is that my
term on the NCBLG will expire this summer.
We are searching for an academic licensed
Geologist to replace me on the Board. If you
are interested, or know of a professor who may
be interested, please contact Barbara Geiger.
North Carolina Board
for
Licensing of Geologists
Richard Spruill, Chairman
Term expires June 30, 2010
Academic Geologist
Ann Borden, Vice Chairman
Term expires June 30, 2011
Independent Geologist
James Simons, Secretary-Treasurer
Serves Ex-Officio
State Geologist
Dennis LaPoint, Member
Term expires June 30, 2011
Mining Geologist
Lindsey Walata, Member
Term expires June 30, 2012
Company Geologist
K.O. Randel, Member
Term expires June 30, 2010
Public Member
Jennie Hauser, Legal Counsel
Robert M. Upton, Administrator
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 41225
Raleigh NC 27629-1225
Physical Address:
3733 Benson Drive
Raleigh NC 27609
919/850-9669
ncblg@bellsouth.net
www.ncblg.org
NC Division of Waste Management (DWM) News Briefs
Ann Borden and Bill Lyke spoke with Dexter Matthews, Director of the NC Division of Waste
Management, in December 2009 to hear an update on the Division, including bills passed in
the General Assembly in 2009 that may be of interest to licensed Geologists. A summary of that
discussion follows.
Moving
In 2011, the state employees in the Archdale, Parker Lincoln and Oberlin buildings will be con-solidated
into the Green Square and Archdale buildings. Green Square is behind the Edenton
Street Methodist Church.
Funding
The Division of Waste Management has been impacted by the economy, but appears to be in
better shape than some other programs. DWM lost six positions and some operational monies
and is operating under a 5% budget cut this fiscal year. Although these issues significantly im-pact
DWM, the Division has a number of funding sources in addition to general appropriations.
General appropriations only account for about 23 to 24% of DWM’s budget. Additional funding
comes from the UST and DCSA Trust Funds, permit fees from hazardous waste, permit and tip
fees from solid waste (a funding source to cleanup old landfills), REC fees, Brownfield fees, other
special funds, and federal grants.
Budget Bill
Two special provisions in last year’s budget bill effected division programs. A three million dollar
cap on remediation costs for voluntary cleanups under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Program
was raised to five million and a five percent shift of revenue received for the scrap tire account
to the Inactive Hazardous Sites cleanup fund and the Bernard Allen Fund occurred.
Program Focus
The following program areas are expected to have increased focus in the next few years: environ-mental
justice, vapor intrusion, dry cleaning sites, inactive sites, brownfields, and natural resource
damage claims. In addition a recent audit of the UST program by the Program Evaluation division
determined that the UST program needs $549 M to address the current backlog of sites.
2009 Bills Passed by the General Assembly:
Senate Bill 700 amended the Dry-Cleaning Solvent Act. Amendments include allowing state or
local land-use controls rather than recorded land-use restrictions, allowing a state-owned facility
to access the fund and reauthorizing DSCA through 2022
Senate Bill 1004 removed the exemption of the Dam Safety Act for utility company coal ash
ponds. USEPA is expected to propose new rules for coal ash, which will fall under Hazardous
Waste or Solid Waste authority early this year.
House Bill 1100 directed DENR to establish storm water and waste water best management
practices for composting operations to protect water quality.
House Bill 1388 made changes in the public notice requirement for brownfields redevelopment.
Now, the developer will be required not only to notify the public but also contiguous property
owners of the remediation and redevelopment plans instead of publishing notices in the state
register.
Senate Bill 141 requires newly constructed drinking water wells to be tested for certain vola-tile
organic compounds. “In developing these rules, the Commission for Public Health shall
incorporate the following factors: (i) known current and historic land uses around well sites and
associated contaminants; (ii) known contaminated sites within a given radius of a well and any
known data regarding dates of contamination, geology, and other relevant factors; (iii) any GIS
based information on known contamination sources from databases available to the Department
of Environment and Natural Resources; and (iv) visual on-site inspections of well sites.” The rules
will provide criteria for local health departments to use in determining what contaminants will be
tested for at a particular site.
House Bill 1575 proposed expanding risk-based remediation, but the bill was not heard in com-mittee
in the last session.
Ann Borden, PG
The following is a listing of new publications
from the North Carolina Geological Survey
(NCGS) and the U.S. Geological Survey
– Water Resources Division (USGS-WRD).
More information is available at the following
websites: http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/
and http://nc.water.usgs.gov/.
New Publications from the NCGS:
Shale Gas Potential in Triassic Strata of
the Deep River Basin, Lee and Chatham
Counties, North Carolina with pipeline and
infrastructure data, North Carolina Geological
Survey Open-file Report 2009-01 (September
2009).
Landslide Hazard Maps for Buncombe Coun-ty,
NC, North Carolina Geological Survey
Geologic Hazards Map Series 4 (GHMS-4)
(August 2009).
North Carolina Geological Survey Information
Circular 36, Natural Gas and Oil in North
Carolina (8 page document available for
download as Adobe PDF document), March
2009.
Landslide Hazard Maps for Watauga County,
NC - (NCGS GHMS-3). These 4 maps
are available for download as Adobe PDF
documents, or as hard-copy plots through the
NCGS Sales Office; March 2008.
New Publications from the USGS-WRD in
North Carolina:
Harden, S.L., 2009, Reconnaissance of
organic wastewater compounds at a concen-trated
swine feeding operation in the North
Carolina Coastal Plain, 2008: U.S. Geological
Survey Open-File Report 2009–1128, 14 p.
Harden, S.L., Chapman, M.J., and Harned,
D.A., 2009, Characterization of groundwater
quality based on regional geologic setting in
the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Physiographic
Provinces, North Carolina: U.S. Geologi-cal
Survey Scientific Investigations Report
2009–5149, 32 p.
New Publications
Related to
North Carolina Geology
Report on ASBOG Annual Meeting
Birmingham, Alabama • November 2-8, 2009
The Annual meeting in Birmingham, AL con-sisted
of two days of meetings by Council of
Examiners (COE) and the annual business
meeting.
Of interest in the COE session was the partici-pation
by members of the Canadian Council of
Professional Geoscientists (CCPG). ASBOG
is in discussions with CCPG on the possible
use of the Fundamental Geologic Exam by
the Canadian Professional Associations that
regulate geologists. The possible infusion
of new exam takers and new insight by new
Subject Matter Experts (SME’s) would be wel-comed
for both the financial health of ASBOG
and the continued quality of the exams.
The primary topic of the annual meeting
was the financial status of ASBOG. Richard
Spruill, as Treasurer, presented proposed
budgets for the next two years that showed
deficient budgets for 2010 and 2011. Exam
takers are down significantly over this last two
years from a high of 2,207 exams in 2007, to
2,027 exams taken in 2008, and 1,663 exams
taken this year (2009). This is a significant
loss of income and thus the deficient spending
likely in 2010 and 2011.
The following actions were approved to re-duce
the possible deficits:
• Increase annual fees paid by states from
$2,950/year (Last increased in 1997) to
$4,500/year starting in 2012.
• Increase test fees for Practical Exam (PG)
from $200 to $250 starting in 2011.
• No increase in Fundamental Exam Fees,
but this should be discussed with individual
boards for 2010 meeting. One option would
be to keep FG fees at the current level of
$150 for students taking exam as exit exam
(or for a period of one year after graduation)
and increasing fees for those taking exam
after this time period.
Further actions will focus on increasing
sources of revenue. Tennessee joined AS-BOG
in 2009 and paid a $25,000 entrance
fee, but adding other new states in the next
few years is unlikely and a bigger risk is the
loss of States due to reduced budgets or new
Legislation. A better source of increased
revenue is increasing the number of exam
takers and thus revenue. Possible pools of
new exam takers are:
• Using the FG exam as an exit exam by
Universities for new graduates.
• Promoting taking the FG exam to recent
graduates.
• Canadian boards using FG exam.
• Encourage large pools of unlicensed ge-ologists
to become registered. Depending
on state, this includes Oil and Gas Geolo-gists,
State and Federal employees, and
university faculty.
ASBOG established an excellent foundation
in 2008 (www.asbogfoundation.org) to sup-port
ASBOG. The foundation focuses on
corporate support to assist ASBOG. However
they have picked the worst time with the finan-cial
crisis to seek funds. Any contacts would
be of value for seeking donations.
Spearheaded by Richard Spruill, within the
coming months ASBOG will provide informa-tion
gathered by ASBOG during the exams
that can be used by university geology depart-ments
to review the performance of their stu-dents
that take the FG exam. The objective is
to get university faculty to require students to
take the exam as an exit exam. Longer term
objectives are to use the FG exam to replace
the GRE exams in geology, which are no
longer given, to be used to evaluate students
for admission to graduate school.
The 2010 Task Assessment Study (TAS) is
near completion and is used to determine the
importance of various tasks performed by ge-ologists
to protect the public. The results are
used to adjust the exams to continue to relate
the exams to the practice of geology. The final
TAS workshop and next COE meeting will be
in Raleigh on April 8-10, 2010.
Dennis LaPoint, PG
The ASBOG Foundation was formed in 2007
to provide the opportunity for sponsorships
that are fully deductible as an ordinary busi-ness
or trade expense in support of quality na-tional
geology examinations. This foundation
provides support for the National Association
of State Boards of Geology (ASBOG) and its
activities.
The goal of the ASBOG Foundation is to es-tablish
a multi-million dollar endowment. The
endowment earnings support the develop-ment
and administration of the national geol-ogy
examinations that are currently required
for licensure in twenty-eight states and one
United States territory.
The ASBOG Foundation provides financial
support for Subject Matter Experts (SME’s)
to develop, review, and evaluate the exami-nations.
SME’s are professional geologists
that have the appropriate specific geological
expertise in a representative area of practice
and geographic location. The SME’s who
prepare the examination questions must be
the very best in the profession. In the past,
travel costs have limited the availability of
these experts. The first objective of the foun-dation
is to provide money to ASBOG to pay
the travel costs for individual SME’s to attend
the workshops where the examination ques-tions
are written. As the endowment grows,
financial assistance may be availableto those
candidates taking the exam. The Founda-tion
will be successful when the cost of the
examination to the candidate is stable and
not a barrier to new candidates entering the
geological profession.
You can help support the geological profes-sion,
the public, ASBOG, and yourself by
sponsoring the ASBOG Foundation in one
or more of the following ways:
• Become an ASBOG Foundation sponsor.
• Recruit potential sponsors for the ASBOG
Foundation.
• Volunteer time and effort to support the
ASBOG Foundation.
ASBOG Foundation Needs Support
If you are interested in more information
regarding the ASBOG Foundation please
contact them at:
The ASBOG Foundation
Post Office Box 12711
Columbia, SC 29211
803/799-1890
803/252-3739 fax
www.asbogfoundation.org
You may also contact the following officers for
additional Information:
Duane A. Eversoll, Treasurer
402/489-1690
402/499-4640
970/577-1368
John W. Williams, President
408/924-5011
Upton Associates
For many years, the North Carolina Board for
Licensing of Geologists has been managed
by the staff at Upton Associates.
Staff members include Robert Upton, Admin-istrator
and Barbara U. Geiger, Assistant to
the Administrator. Additional assistance from
Upton staff is provided by Sharon Sally, Lisa
Deubler, and Jean Kirk.
Upton’s responsibilities to the Board include
daily management, answering phone calls,
maintaining accurate records for licensees
by computer and in hard copy, administer-ing
the examination twice each year, and
accounting.
Upton Associates began working with the
Board in 1992 and was responsible for install-ing
modern computer-based methods. This
progressive style continues today.
Update your Record
From the rules of the Geology Board,
Chapter 21 NCAC 21 .0203
“Every individual licensee has the con-tinuing
responsibility of keeping the Board
currently advised of the licensee’s proper
and current mailing address and the name or
names under which the licensee is practicing.
Each licensee shall immediately notify the
Board of any and all changes of association
or address.”
Please check the information on your ad-dess
at the Board’s website at ncblg.org.
Send changes of address and employment
to ncblg@bellsouth.net.
Dates of Interest
Board Meetings
January 7, 2010
April 22, 2010
August 12, 2010
November 18, 2010
All meetings of the Board will be held at the
Board office, located at 3733 Benson Drive,
Raleigh NC 27609.
ASBOG Exam
March 5, 2010
October 1, 2010
Each section of the ASBOG exam will be held
at the Jane S. McKimmon Center, located at
1101 Gorman Street, Raleigh NC 27606.
Naturally Occurring
Asbestos
The North Carolina Division of Public Health
(NCDPH) has asked that the Board distribute
the following information regarding Naturally
Occurring Asbestos (NOA) to our licensees.
The two-page fact sheet that follows provides
general information about NOAs and provides
recommendations on how to minimize expo-sure.
As the public becomes more aware of
the presence of NOAs and its health impli-cations,
Geologists may experience more
calls from the public. The information on
the Fact Sheet will provide Geologists some
background on the health issues associated
with NOAs.
􀀒􁈀􀀗􁜀􀀝􁴀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀆􀘀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀇􀜀􀀁􀄀
􀀇􀜀􀀍����􀀏􀼀􀀝􁴀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀎􀸀􀀙􁤀􀀞􁸀���􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀍����􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀖􁘀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀋􀬀􀀏􀼀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀
􀀅􀔀􀀜􁰀􀀎􀸀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀙􁤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀂􀈀􀀊􀨀􀀋􀬀􀀅􀔀􀀃􀌀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀝􁴀􀀔􁐀􀀁􀄀􀀆􀘀􀀍􀴀􀀛􁬀􀀙􁤀􀀖􁘀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀
􀀌􀰀􀀔􁐀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀖􁘀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀏􀼀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀜􁰀􀀎􀸀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀙􁤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀂􀈀􀀊􀨀􀀋􀬀􀀅􀔀􀀃􀌀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀
􀀐􁀀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀���􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀩��􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀝􁴀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀥􂔀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀘􁠀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀
􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀪􂨀􀀡􂄀􀀩􂤀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀙􁤀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀
􀀉􀤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀋􀬀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀚􁨀􀀛􁬀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀑􁄀􀀘􁠀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀙���􀀛􁬀􀀝􁴀􀀔􁐀􀀁􀄀��􀘀􀀍􀴀����􁬀􀀙􁤀􀀖􁘀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀
􀀕􁔀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀖􁘀􀀣􂌀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀔􁐀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀌􀰀􀀛􁬀􀀤􂐀􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀝􁴀􀀟􁼀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀔􁐀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀫􂬀􀀛􁬀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀂􀈀􀀖􁘀􀀔􁐀􀀌􀰀􀀔􁐀􀀃􀌀􀀁􀄀􀀞􁸀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀚􁨀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀
􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀈��􀀡􂄀��􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀙􁤀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀫􂬀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀
􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀉􀤀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀡􂄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀚􁨀􀀗􁜀􀀮􂸀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀙􁤀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀫􂬀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀
􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀���􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀��􂄀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀙􁤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀡􂄀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀚􁨀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀
􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀭􂴀􀀥􂔀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀠􂀀􀀁���􀀜􁰀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀������􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀
􀀈􀠀􀀙􁤀􀀟􁼀􀀁􀄀􀀏􀼀􀀍􀴀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀖􁘀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀏􀼀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀜􁰀􀀎􀸀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀙􁤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀒􁈀􀀒􁈀􀀑􁄀􀀏􀼀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀔􁐀􀀑􁄀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀝􁴀􀀔􁐀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀
􀀋􀬀􀀭􂴀􀀥􂔀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀪􂨀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀮􂸀􀀥􂔀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀪􂨀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀���􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀛􁬀􀀡􂄀􀀡����􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀
􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀡􂄀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀂􀈀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀨􂠀􀀪􂨀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀫􂬀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀝􁴀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀃􀌀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀
􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀮􂸀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀤􂐀􀀚􁨀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤���􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀟��􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀����􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀑􁄀􀀣􂌀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀
􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀪􂨀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀪􂨀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀨􂠀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀅􀔀
􀀎􀸀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀���􁨀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀩���􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀚����􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀡􂄀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀
􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀧􂜀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀠􂀀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀
􀀌􀰀􀀔􁐀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀛􁬀􀀑􁄀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀑􁄀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀍􀴀􀀠􂀀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀔􁐀􀀕􁔀􀀏􀼀􀀔􁐀􀀁􀄀􀀉􀤀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀕􁔀􀀓􁌀􀀔􁐀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀕􁔀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀎􀸀􀀁􀄀􀀘���􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀞����􀀛􁬀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀖􁘀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀����􁤀􀀏􀼀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀜􁰀􀀎􀸀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀙􁤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀
􀀗􁜀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀑􁄀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀄􀐀
􀀁􀄀 􀀏􀼀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀠􂀀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀍􀴀􀀗􁜀􀀢􂈀􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀡􂄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀗���􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀟􁼀􀀜􁰀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀����􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀝􁴀􀀛􁬀􀀢􂈀􀀁􀄀􀀞􁸀􀀪􂨀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀠􂀀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀
􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀖􁘀􀀨􂠀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀙􁤀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀡􂄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀝􁴀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀙􁤀􀀩􂤀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀����􀄀��􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀
􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀���􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀊􀨀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀫􂬀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀦􂘀􀀪􂨀􀀟􁼀􀀥􂔀􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀌􀰀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀚􁨀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀨􂠀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀥􂔀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀭􂴀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀫􂬀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑���􀀈􀠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀓􁌀􀀛􁬀􀀢􂈀􀀤􂐀􀀫􂬀􀀟􁼀����􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀠􂀀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀥􂔀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀
􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀
􀀊􀨀􀀒􁈀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀋􀬀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀘􁠀􀀖􁘀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀜􁰀􀀏􀼀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀋􀬀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀋􀬀􀀔􁐀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀏􀼀􀀗􁜀􀀜􁰀􀀁�����􀀏􀼀􀀠􂀀􀀙􁤀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀗����􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀋􀬀􀀕􁔀􀀕􁔀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀚􁨀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀑􁄀􀀁􀄀
􀀋􀬀􀀛􁬀􀀌􀰀􀀏􀼀􀀛􁬀􀀜􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀃􀌀
􀀁􀅌 Leave NOA in place and undisturbed.
􀀁􀅌 Limit dust generating activities by wetting the area with water prior to and
during the activity.
􀀁􀅃 Cover or cap NOA material with three to six inches of soil that contains
less than 0.25 percent asbestos (Note: other materials may be also
substituted in place of soil).
􀀁􀅍 Maintain the area covered with plants to prevent erosion.
􀀇􀜀􀀘􁠀􀀟􁼀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀋􀬀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀􀀎􀸀􀀏􀼀􀀜􁰀􀀏􀼀􀀚􁨀􀀖􁘀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀓􁌀􀀐􁀀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀋􀬀􀀕􁔀􀀕􁔀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀���􀴀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀚􁨀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀑􁄀􀀁􀄀􀀋􀬀􀀛􁬀􀀌􀰀􀀏􀼀􀀛􁬀��􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀓􁌀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀖􁘀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀋􀬀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀋􀬀􀀃􀌀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀅒 Refer to the US Geological Survey’s Report on Naturally Occurring
Asbestos at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1189/.
􀀁􀅃 Consider contacting a licensed professional geologist in your area at
http://www.ncblg.org/IndivLicensees.cfm.
􀀅􀔀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀖􁘀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀖􁘀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀓􁌀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀂􀈀􀀁􀅃
Contact the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Division of
Public Health, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology at 919-707-5900.
To learn more about NOA see the following websites:
􀀈􀠀􀀗􁜀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀖􁘀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀓􁌀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀����􁰀􀀒􁈀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀆􀘀􀀏􀼀􀀗􁜀􀀏􀼀􀀚􁨀􀀋􀬀􀀕􁔀􀀁􀄀􀀉􀤀􀀝􁴀��􀰀􀀕􁔀􀀓􁌀􀀍􀴀􀀂􀈀􀀁􀄀􀅨
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/noa/basicinfo.html
http://www.epa.gov/asbestos/pubs/clean.html
􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀗􁜀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀖􁘀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀓􁌀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀄􀐀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀜􁰀􀀚􁨀􀀋􀬀􀀍􀴀􀀜􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀛􁬀􀀂􀉷
www.fairfaxcounty.gov/hd/asb/
www.arb.ca.gov/cap/handbooks/asbestosnoafinal.pdf
State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Hum n Services, Division of Public Health a October, 2009
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch
www.ncdhhs.gov www.ncpublichealth.com
􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁��􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀆􀘀􀀃􀌀􀀁􀄀􀀄􀐀􀀅􀔀􀀅􀔀􀀇􀜀􀀁􀄀��􀬀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀎􀸀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀑􁄀􀀕􁔀􀀈􀠀􀀌􀰀􀀁􀄀􀀏􀼀􀀐􁀀􀀐��􀀏􀼀􀀒􁈀􀀔􁐀􀀕􁔀􀀎􀸀􀀋􀬀􀀔􁐀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀍􀴀􀀐􁀀􀀌􀰀􀀏􀼀􀀗􁜀􀀊􀨀􀀒􁈀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀎􀸀􀀉􀤀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀒􁈀􀀏􀼀􀀖􁘀􀀋􀬀􀀉􀤀􀀊􀨀􀀒􁈀􀀂􀈀􀀁􀅐
Page 2 of 2

North Carolina Board for Licensing of Geologists
N E W S L E T T E R
Wi n t e r 2 0 1 0 • P. O . B o x 4 1 2 2 5 • R a l e i g h , N o r t h C a r o l i n a 2 7 6 2 9 • 9 1 9 - 8 5 0 - 9 6 6 9 • n c b l g @ b e l l s o u t h . n e t
Rules of Professional Conduct
The Licensing Board reminds each licensee that it is his/her responsibility to read, understand, and
follow the Rules of Professional Conduct for Geologists. These rules are presented in section 0.1100
of 21 NCAC 21 and can be accessed through the NCBLG website. The Board has also decided to
print the Rules in their entirety in installments in four consecutive newsletters.
In this second installment, sections .1101 (d), (e), and (f) are presented. Section (d) charges each
licensee to issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner. Section (e) charges
each licensee not to supplant another licensee once they are selected in an employment situation.
Section (f) charges each licensee to avoid conflicts of interest. Each section is presented in its
entirety below.
21 NCAC 21 .1101 RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT (continued)
(d) The geologist shall issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner:
1. The geologist shall be completely objective and truthful in all professional reports, statements,
or testimony. He shall include all relevant and pertinent information in such reports, statements or
testimony.
2. The geologist when serving as an expert or technical witness before any court, commission, or
other tribunal shall express an opinion only when it is founded upon adequate knowledge of the
facts in issue, upon a background of technical competence in the subject matter, and upon honest
conviction of the accuracy and propriety of his testimony.
3. The geologist will issue no statements, criticisms, or arguments on geologic matters connected with
public policy which are inspired or paid for by an interested party or parties unless he has prefaced
his comments by explicitly identifying himself, by disclosing the identities of the party or parties on
whose behalf he is speaking, and by revealing the existence of any pecuniary interest he may have
in the instant matters.
4. The geologist shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely, directly or indirectly, the professional
reputation, prospects, practice, or employment of another geologist, nor shall he maliciously criticize
another geologist’s work in public. If he believes that another geologist is guilty of misconduct or
illegal practice, he shall present such information to the Board for action.
(e) The geologist shall not attempt to supplant another geologist in a particular employment after
becoming aware that the other has been selected for the employment.
(f) The geologist shall avoid conflicts of interest:
1. The geologist shall conscientiously avoid conflicts of interest with his employer or client, but when
unavoidable, the geologist shall forthwith disclose the circumstances to his employer or client.
2. The geologist shall avoid all known conflicts of interest with his employer or client, and shall
promptly inform his employer or client of any business association, interest, or circumstances which
could influence his judgment or the quality of his services.
3. The geologist shall not accept compensation, financial or otherwise, from more than one party for
services on the same project, or for services pertaining to the same project, unless the circumstances
are fully disclosed to, and agreed to, by all those parties.
4. The geologist shall not solicit or accept financial or other valuable considerations from material or
equipment suppliers for specifying their products.
5. The geologist shall not solicit or accept substantial gratuities, directly or indirectly, from contrac-tors,
their agents, or other parties dealing with his client or employer in connection with work for
which he is responsible.
6. When in public service as a member, advisor, or employee of a governmental body or department,
the geologist shall not participate in considerations or actions with respect to services provided by
him or his organization in private geological practices.
7. The geologist shall not solicit or accept a geologic contract from a governmental body on which
a principal or officer of his business serves as a member.
Chairman’s
Message
As the Academic Board Member, I want to iden-tify
two items that are of importance to me. The
first concerns the Board’s stance on continuing
education for our licensees. NCBLG does not
require our licensees to complete continuing
education credits to maintain their professional
license. However, the Board expects that
each licensee understands the importance of
continuing education in staying up-to-date in
your area of expertise. Educational activities
are excellent opportunities to support or expand
your experience in your area(s) of expertise.
Section 1101-2C of the Rules of Professional
Conduct (21 NCAC 21), which was reproduced
in the Fall 2009 Board Newsletter, addresses
the importance of education. That section
states that:
“The geologist shall undertake to perform
geologic assignments only when qualified by
education or experience in the specific techni-cal
field of geology involved”, and
“The geologist shall not affix his signature and
seal to any document dealing with subject
matter for which he lacks competence by
virtue of education or experience….or docu-ment
not prepared under his direct supervisory
control…”.
While these statements include the words
“education or experience” not “education and
experience”, the Board generally does not view
education, without experience, as sufficient to
qualify someone as being proficient in an area
of expertise. Education alone is generally not
sufficient to produce a work product that would
protect the safety, health, and welfare of the
public. Yet, it is the view of the Board that
successful completion of continuing education
courses can support and expand the licensee’s
experience in their area(s) of expertise, result-ing
in a superior work product that serves to
protect the public.
The second item I want to point out is that my
term on the NCBLG will expire this summer.
We are searching for an academic licensed
Geologist to replace me on the Board. If you
are interested, or know of a professor who may
be interested, please contact Barbara Geiger.
North Carolina Board
for
Licensing of Geologists
Richard Spruill, Chairman
Term expires June 30, 2010
Academic Geologist
Ann Borden, Vice Chairman
Term expires June 30, 2011
Independent Geologist
James Simons, Secretary-Treasurer
Serves Ex-Officio
State Geologist
Dennis LaPoint, Member
Term expires June 30, 2011
Mining Geologist
Lindsey Walata, Member
Term expires June 30, 2012
Company Geologist
K.O. Randel, Member
Term expires June 30, 2010
Public Member
Jennie Hauser, Legal Counsel
Robert M. Upton, Administrator
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 41225
Raleigh NC 27629-1225
Physical Address:
3733 Benson Drive
Raleigh NC 27609
919/850-9669
ncblg@bellsouth.net
www.ncblg.org
NC Division of Waste Management (DWM) News Briefs
Ann Borden and Bill Lyke spoke with Dexter Matthews, Director of the NC Division of Waste
Management, in December 2009 to hear an update on the Division, including bills passed in
the General Assembly in 2009 that may be of interest to licensed Geologists. A summary of that
discussion follows.
Moving
In 2011, the state employees in the Archdale, Parker Lincoln and Oberlin buildings will be con-solidated
into the Green Square and Archdale buildings. Green Square is behind the Edenton
Street Methodist Church.
Funding
The Division of Waste Management has been impacted by the economy, but appears to be in
better shape than some other programs. DWM lost six positions and some operational monies
and is operating under a 5% budget cut this fiscal year. Although these issues significantly im-pact
DWM, the Division has a number of funding sources in addition to general appropriations.
General appropriations only account for about 23 to 24% of DWM’s budget. Additional funding
comes from the UST and DCSA Trust Funds, permit fees from hazardous waste, permit and tip
fees from solid waste (a funding source to cleanup old landfills), REC fees, Brownfield fees, other
special funds, and federal grants.
Budget Bill
Two special provisions in last year’s budget bill effected division programs. A three million dollar
cap on remediation costs for voluntary cleanups under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Program
was raised to five million and a five percent shift of revenue received for the scrap tire account
to the Inactive Hazardous Sites cleanup fund and the Bernard Allen Fund occurred.
Program Focus
The following program areas are expected to have increased focus in the next few years: environ-mental
justice, vapor intrusion, dry cleaning sites, inactive sites, brownfields, and natural resource
damage claims. In addition a recent audit of the UST program by the Program Evaluation division
determined that the UST program needs $549 M to address the current backlog of sites.
2009 Bills Passed by the General Assembly:
Senate Bill 700 amended the Dry-Cleaning Solvent Act. Amendments include allowing state or
local land-use controls rather than recorded land-use restrictions, allowing a state-owned facility
to access the fund and reauthorizing DSCA through 2022
Senate Bill 1004 removed the exemption of the Dam Safety Act for utility company coal ash
ponds. USEPA is expected to propose new rules for coal ash, which will fall under Hazardous
Waste or Solid Waste authority early this year.
House Bill 1100 directed DENR to establish storm water and waste water best management
practices for composting operations to protect water quality.
House Bill 1388 made changes in the public notice requirement for brownfields redevelopment.
Now, the developer will be required not only to notify the public but also contiguous property
owners of the remediation and redevelopment plans instead of publishing notices in the state
register.
Senate Bill 141 requires newly constructed drinking water wells to be tested for certain vola-tile
organic compounds. “In developing these rules, the Commission for Public Health shall
incorporate the following factors: (i) known current and historic land uses around well sites and
associated contaminants; (ii) known contaminated sites within a given radius of a well and any
known data regarding dates of contamination, geology, and other relevant factors; (iii) any GIS
based information on known contamination sources from databases available to the Department
of Environment and Natural Resources; and (iv) visual on-site inspections of well sites.” The rules
will provide criteria for local health departments to use in determining what contaminants will be
tested for at a particular site.
House Bill 1575 proposed expanding risk-based remediation, but the bill was not heard in com-mittee
in the last session.
Ann Borden, PG
The following is a listing of new publications
from the North Carolina Geological Survey
(NCGS) and the U.S. Geological Survey
– Water Resources Division (USGS-WRD).
More information is available at the following
websites: http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/
and http://nc.water.usgs.gov/.
New Publications from the NCGS:
Shale Gas Potential in Triassic Strata of
the Deep River Basin, Lee and Chatham
Counties, North Carolina with pipeline and
infrastructure data, North Carolina Geological
Survey Open-file Report 2009-01 (September
2009).
Landslide Hazard Maps for Buncombe Coun-ty,
NC, North Carolina Geological Survey
Geologic Hazards Map Series 4 (GHMS-4)
(August 2009).
North Carolina Geological Survey Information
Circular 36, Natural Gas and Oil in North
Carolina (8 page document available for
download as Adobe PDF document), March
2009.
Landslide Hazard Maps for Watauga County,
NC - (NCGS GHMS-3). These 4 maps
are available for download as Adobe PDF
documents, or as hard-copy plots through the
NCGS Sales Office; March 2008.
New Publications from the USGS-WRD in
North Carolina:
Harden, S.L., 2009, Reconnaissance of
organic wastewater compounds at a concen-trated
swine feeding operation in the North
Carolina Coastal Plain, 2008: U.S. Geological
Survey Open-File Report 2009–1128, 14 p.
Harden, S.L., Chapman, M.J., and Harned,
D.A., 2009, Characterization of groundwater
quality based on regional geologic setting in
the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Physiographic
Provinces, North Carolina: U.S. Geologi-cal
Survey Scientific Investigations Report
2009–5149, 32 p.
New Publications
Related to
North Carolina Geology
Report on ASBOG Annual Meeting
Birmingham, Alabama • November 2-8, 2009
The Annual meeting in Birmingham, AL con-sisted
of two days of meetings by Council of
Examiners (COE) and the annual business
meeting.
Of interest in the COE session was the partici-pation
by members of the Canadian Council of
Professional Geoscientists (CCPG). ASBOG
is in discussions with CCPG on the possible
use of the Fundamental Geologic Exam by
the Canadian Professional Associations that
regulate geologists. The possible infusion
of new exam takers and new insight by new
Subject Matter Experts (SME’s) would be wel-comed
for both the financial health of ASBOG
and the continued quality of the exams.
The primary topic of the annual meeting
was the financial status of ASBOG. Richard
Spruill, as Treasurer, presented proposed
budgets for the next two years that showed
deficient budgets for 2010 and 2011. Exam
takers are down significantly over this last two
years from a high of 2,207 exams in 2007, to
2,027 exams taken in 2008, and 1,663 exams
taken this year (2009). This is a significant
loss of income and thus the deficient spending
likely in 2010 and 2011.
The following actions were approved to re-duce
the possible deficits:
• Increase annual fees paid by states from
$2,950/year (Last increased in 1997) to
$4,500/year starting in 2012.
• Increase test fees for Practical Exam (PG)
from $200 to $250 starting in 2011.
• No increase in Fundamental Exam Fees,
but this should be discussed with individual
boards for 2010 meeting. One option would
be to keep FG fees at the current level of
$150 for students taking exam as exit exam
(or for a period of one year after graduation)
and increasing fees for those taking exam
after this time period.
Further actions will focus on increasing
sources of revenue. Tennessee joined AS-BOG
in 2009 and paid a $25,000 entrance
fee, but adding other new states in the next
few years is unlikely and a bigger risk is the
loss of States due to reduced budgets or new
Legislation. A better source of increased
revenue is increasing the number of exam
takers and thus revenue. Possible pools of
new exam takers are:
• Using the FG exam as an exit exam by
Universities for new graduates.
• Promoting taking the FG exam to recent
graduates.
• Canadian boards using FG exam.
• Encourage large pools of unlicensed ge-ologists
to become registered. Depending
on state, this includes Oil and Gas Geolo-gists,
State and Federal employees, and
university faculty.
ASBOG established an excellent foundation
in 2008 (www.asbogfoundation.org) to sup-port
ASBOG. The foundation focuses on
corporate support to assist ASBOG. However
they have picked the worst time with the finan-cial
crisis to seek funds. Any contacts would
be of value for seeking donations.
Spearheaded by Richard Spruill, within the
coming months ASBOG will provide informa-tion
gathered by ASBOG during the exams
that can be used by university geology depart-ments
to review the performance of their stu-dents
that take the FG exam. The objective is
to get university faculty to require students to
take the exam as an exit exam. Longer term
objectives are to use the FG exam to replace
the GRE exams in geology, which are no
longer given, to be used to evaluate students
for admission to graduate school.
The 2010 Task Assessment Study (TAS) is
near completion and is used to determine the
importance of various tasks performed by ge-ologists
to protect the public. The results are
used to adjust the exams to continue to relate
the exams to the practice of geology. The final
TAS workshop and next COE meeting will be
in Raleigh on April 8-10, 2010.
Dennis LaPoint, PG
The ASBOG Foundation was formed in 2007
to provide the opportunity for sponsorships
that are fully deductible as an ordinary busi-ness
or trade expense in support of quality na-tional
geology examinations. This foundation
provides support for the National Association
of State Boards of Geology (ASBOG) and its
activities.
The goal of the ASBOG Foundation is to es-tablish
a multi-million dollar endowment. The
endowment earnings support the develop-ment
and administration of the national geol-ogy
examinations that are currently required
for licensure in twenty-eight states and one
United States territory.
The ASBOG Foundation provides financial
support for Subject Matter Experts (SME’s)
to develop, review, and evaluate the exami-nations.
SME’s are professional geologists
that have the appropriate specific geological
expertise in a representative area of practice
and geographic location. The SME’s who
prepare the examination questions must be
the very best in the profession. In the past,
travel costs have limited the availability of
these experts. The first objective of the foun-dation
is to provide money to ASBOG to pay
the travel costs for individual SME’s to attend
the workshops where the examination ques-tions
are written. As the endowment grows,
financial assistance may be availableto those
candidates taking the exam. The Founda-tion
will be successful when the cost of the
examination to the candidate is stable and
not a barrier to new candidates entering the
geological profession.
You can help support the geological profes-sion,
the public, ASBOG, and yourself by
sponsoring the ASBOG Foundation in one
or more of the following ways:
• Become an ASBOG Foundation sponsor.
• Recruit potential sponsors for the ASBOG
Foundation.
• Volunteer time and effort to support the
ASBOG Foundation.
ASBOG Foundation Needs Support
If you are interested in more information
regarding the ASBOG Foundation please
contact them at:
The ASBOG Foundation
Post Office Box 12711
Columbia, SC 29211
803/799-1890
803/252-3739 fax
www.asbogfoundation.org
You may also contact the following officers for
additional Information:
Duane A. Eversoll, Treasurer
402/489-1690
402/499-4640
970/577-1368
John W. Williams, President
408/924-5011
Upton Associates
For many years, the North Carolina Board for
Licensing of Geologists has been managed
by the staff at Upton Associates.
Staff members include Robert Upton, Admin-istrator
and Barbara U. Geiger, Assistant to
the Administrator. Additional assistance from
Upton staff is provided by Sharon Sally, Lisa
Deubler, and Jean Kirk.
Upton’s responsibilities to the Board include
daily management, answering phone calls,
maintaining accurate records for licensees
by computer and in hard copy, administer-ing
the examination twice each year, and
accounting.
Upton Associates began working with the
Board in 1992 and was responsible for install-ing
modern computer-based methods. This
progressive style continues today.
Update your Record
From the rules of the Geology Board,
Chapter 21 NCAC 21 .0203
“Every individual licensee has the con-tinuing
responsibility of keeping the Board
currently advised of the licensee’s proper
and current mailing address and the name or
names under which the licensee is practicing.
Each licensee shall immediately notify the
Board of any and all changes of association
or address.”
Please check the information on your ad-dess
at the Board’s website at ncblg.org.
Send changes of address and employment
to ncblg@bellsouth.net.
Dates of Interest
Board Meetings
January 7, 2010
April 22, 2010
August 12, 2010
November 18, 2010
All meetings of the Board will be held at the
Board office, located at 3733 Benson Drive,
Raleigh NC 27609.
ASBOG Exam
March 5, 2010
October 1, 2010
Each section of the ASBOG exam will be held
at the Jane S. McKimmon Center, located at
1101 Gorman Street, Raleigh NC 27606.
Naturally Occurring
Asbestos
The North Carolina Division of Public Health
(NCDPH) has asked that the Board distribute
the following information regarding Naturally
Occurring Asbestos (NOA) to our licensees.
The two-page fact sheet that follows provides
general information about NOAs and provides
recommendations on how to minimize expo-sure.
As the public becomes more aware of
the presence of NOAs and its health impli-cations,
Geologists may experience more
calls from the public. The information on
the Fact Sheet will provide Geologists some
background on the health issues associated
with NOAs.
􀀒􁈀􀀗􁜀􀀝􁴀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀆􀘀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀇􀜀􀀁􀄀
􀀇􀜀􀀍����􀀏􀼀􀀝􁴀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀎􀸀􀀙􁤀􀀞􁸀���􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀍����􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀖􁘀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀋􀬀􀀏􀼀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀
􀀅􀔀􀀜􁰀􀀎􀸀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀙􁤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀂􀈀􀀊􀨀􀀋􀬀􀀅􀔀􀀃􀌀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀝􁴀􀀔􁐀􀀁􀄀􀀆􀘀􀀍􀴀􀀛􁬀􀀙􁤀􀀖􁘀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀
􀀌􀰀􀀔􁐀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀖􁘀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀏􀼀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀜􁰀􀀎􀸀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀙􁤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀂􀈀􀀊􀨀􀀋􀬀􀀅􀔀􀀃􀌀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀
􀀐􁀀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀���􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀩��􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀝􁴀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀥􂔀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀘􁠀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀
􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀪􂨀􀀡􂄀􀀩􂤀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀙􁤀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀
􀀉􀤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀋􀬀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀚􁨀􀀛􁬀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀑􁄀􀀘􁠀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀙���􀀛􁬀􀀝􁴀􀀔􁐀􀀁􀄀��􀘀􀀍􀴀����􁬀􀀙􁤀􀀖􁘀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀
􀀕􁔀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀖􁘀􀀣􂌀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀔􁐀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀌􀰀􀀛􁬀􀀤􂐀􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀝􁴀􀀟􁼀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀔􁐀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀫􂬀􀀛􁬀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀂􀈀􀀖􁘀􀀔􁐀􀀌􀰀􀀔􁐀􀀃􀌀􀀁􀄀􀀞􁸀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀚􁨀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀
􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀈��􀀡􂄀��􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀙􁤀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀫􂬀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀
􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀉􀤀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀡􂄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀚􁨀􀀗􁜀􀀮􂸀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀙􁤀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀫􂬀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀
􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀���􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀��􂄀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀙􁤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀡􂄀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀚􁨀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀
􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀭􂴀􀀥􂔀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀠􂀀􀀁���􀀜􁰀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀������􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀
􀀈􀠀􀀙􁤀􀀟􁼀􀀁􀄀􀀏􀼀􀀍􀴀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀖􁘀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀏􀼀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀜􁰀􀀎􀸀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀙􁤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀒􁈀􀀒􁈀􀀑􁄀􀀏􀼀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀔􁐀􀀑􁄀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀝􁴀􀀔􁐀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀
􀀋􀬀􀀭􂴀􀀥􂔀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀪􂨀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀮􂸀􀀥􂔀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀪􂨀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀���􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀛􁬀􀀡􂄀􀀡����􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀
􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀡􂄀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀂􀈀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀨􂠀􀀪􂨀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀫􂬀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀝􁴀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀃􀌀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀
􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀮􂸀􀀤􂐀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀤􂐀􀀚􁨀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤���􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀟��􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀����􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀑􁄀􀀣􂌀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀
􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀪􂨀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀪􂨀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀨􂠀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀅􀔀
􀀎􀸀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀙􁤀􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀���􁨀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀩���􀀪􂨀􀀧􂜀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀚����􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀟􁼀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀡􂄀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀
􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀧􂜀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀠􂀀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀
􀀌􀰀􀀔􁐀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀛􁬀􀀑􁄀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀑􁄀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀍􀴀􀀠􂀀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀔􁐀􀀕􁔀􀀏􀼀􀀔􁐀􀀁􀄀􀀉􀤀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀕􁔀􀀓􁌀􀀔􁐀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀕􁔀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀎􀸀􀀁􀄀􀀘���􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀞����􀀛􁬀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀖􁘀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀����􁤀􀀏􀼀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀘􁠀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀜􁰀􀀎􀸀􀀑􁄀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀙􁤀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀
􀀗􁜀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀑􁄀􀀛􁬀􀀕􁔀􀀍􀴀􀀖􁘀􀀄􀐀
􀀁􀄀 􀀏􀼀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀠􂀀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀍􀴀􀀗􁜀􀀢􂈀􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀨􂠀􀀛􁬀􀀡􂄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀗���􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀟􁼀􀀜􁰀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀����􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀝􁴀􀀛􁬀􀀢􂈀􀀁􀄀􀀞􁸀􀀪􂨀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀠􂀀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀
􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀖􁘀􀀨􂠀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀙􁤀􀀞􁸀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀥􂔀􀀡􂄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀗􁜀􀀧􂜀􀀝􁴀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀙􁤀􀀩􂤀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀����􀄀��􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀
􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀���􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀊􀨀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀡􂄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀨􂠀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀨􂠀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀧􂜀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀠􂀀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀁􀄀􀀬􂰀􀀟􁼀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀁􀄀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀗􁜀􀀫􂬀􀀮􂸀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀦􂘀􀀪􂨀􀀟􁼀􀀥􂔀􀀢􂈀􀀛􁬀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀌􀰀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀚􁨀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀄􀐀􀀁􀄀􀀡􂄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀨􂠀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀥􂔀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀭􂴀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀫􂬀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀨􂠀􀀤􂐀􀀟􁼀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀩􂤀􀀗􁜀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑���􀀈􀠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀄀 􀀓􁌀􀀛􁬀􀀢􂈀􀀤􂐀􀀫􂬀􀀟􁼀����􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀠􂀀􀀣􂌀􀀤􂐀􀀬􂰀􀀣􂌀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀑􁄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀧􂜀􀀗􁜀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀥􂔀􀀤􂐀􀀧􂜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀣􂌀􀀝􁴀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀢􂈀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀟􁼀􀀗􁜀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀩􂤀􀀤􂐀􀀁􀄀􀀤􂐀􀀩􂤀􀀞􁸀􀀛􁬀􀀧􂜀􀀁􀄀
􀀡􂄀􀀤􂐀􀀙􁤀􀀗􁜀􀀩􂤀􀀟􁼀􀀤􂐀􀀣􂌀􀀨􂠀􀀅􀔀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀
􀀊􀨀􀀒􁈀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀁􀄀􀀋􀬀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀘􁠀􀀖􁘀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀛􁬀􀀜􁰀􀀏􀼀􀀙􁤀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀋􀬀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀋􀬀􀀔􁐀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀙􁤀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀞􁸀􀀏􀼀􀀗􁜀􀀜􁰀􀀁�����􀀏􀼀􀀠􂀀􀀙􁤀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀜􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀁􀄀􀀗����􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀋􀬀􀀕􁔀􀀕􁔀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀􀀍􀴀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀚􁨀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀑􁄀􀀁􀄀
􀀋􀬀􀀛􁬀􀀌􀰀􀀏􀼀􀀛􁬀􀀜􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀃􀌀
􀀁􀅌 Leave NOA in place and undisturbed.
􀀁􀅌 Limit dust generating activities by wetting the area with water prior to and
during the activity.
􀀁􀅃 Cover or cap NOA material with three to six inches of soil that contains
less than 0.25 percent asbestos (Note: other materials may be also
substituted in place of soil).
􀀁􀅍 Maintain the area covered with plants to prevent erosion.
􀀇􀜀􀀘􁠀􀀟􁼀􀀁􀄀􀀍􀴀􀀋􀬀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀁􀄀􀀎􀸀􀀏􀼀􀀜􁰀􀀏􀼀􀀚􁨀􀀖􁘀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀓􁌀􀀐􁀀􀀁􀄀􀀗􁜀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀋􀬀􀀕􁔀􀀕􁔀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀘􁠀���􀴀􀀍􀴀􀀝􁴀􀀚􁨀􀀚􁨀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀑􁄀􀀁􀄀􀀋􀬀􀀛􁬀􀀌􀰀􀀏􀼀􀀛􁬀��􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀓􁌀􀀛􁬀􀀁􀄀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀖􁘀􀀡􂄀􀀁􀄀􀀋􀬀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀋􀬀􀀃􀌀􀀁􀄀
􀀁􀅒 Refer to the US Geological Survey’s Report on Naturally Occurring
Asbestos at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1189/.
􀀁􀅃 Consider contacting a licensed professional geologist in your area at
http://www.ncblg.org/IndivLicensees.cfm.
􀀅􀔀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀖􁘀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀓􁌀􀀗􁜀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀖􁘀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀓􁌀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀂􀈀􀀁􀅃
Contact the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Division of
Public Health, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology at 919-707-5900.
To learn more about NOA see the following websites:
􀀈􀠀􀀗􁜀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀖􁘀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀓􁌀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀����􁰀􀀒􁈀􀀏􀼀􀀁􀄀􀀆􀘀􀀏􀼀􀀗􁜀􀀏􀼀􀀚􁨀􀀋􀬀􀀕􁔀􀀁􀄀􀀉􀤀􀀝􁴀��􀰀􀀕􁔀􀀓􁌀􀀍􀴀􀀂􀈀􀀁􀄀􀅨
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/noa/basicinfo.html
http://www.epa.gov/asbestos/pubs/clean.html
􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀗􁜀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀖􁘀􀀋􀬀􀀜􁰀􀀓􁌀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀁􀄀􀀄􀐀􀀘􁠀􀀗􁜀􀀜􁰀􀀚􁨀􀀋􀬀􀀍􀴀􀀜􁰀􀀘􁠀􀀚􁨀􀀛􁬀􀀂􀉷
www.fairfaxcounty.gov/hd/asb/
www.arb.ca.gov/cap/handbooks/asbestosnoafinal.pdf
State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Hum n Services, Division of Public Health a October, 2009
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch
www.ncdhhs.gov www.ncpublichealth.com
􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁��􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀁􀄀􀀆􀘀􀀃􀌀􀀁􀄀􀀄􀐀􀀅􀔀􀀅􀔀􀀇􀜀􀀁􀄀��􀬀􀀓􁌀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀎􀸀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀑􁄀􀀕􁔀􀀈􀠀􀀌􀰀􀀁􀄀􀀏􀼀􀀐􁀀􀀐��􀀏􀼀􀀒􁈀􀀔􁐀􀀕􁔀􀀎􀸀􀀋􀬀􀀔􁐀􀀗􁜀􀀁􀄀􀀊􀨀􀀍􀴀􀀐􁀀􀀌􀰀􀀏􀼀􀀗􁜀􀀊􀨀􀀒􁈀􀀁􀄀􀀈􀠀􀀎􀸀􀀉􀤀􀀁􀄀􀀐􁀀􀀒􁈀􀀏􀼀􀀖􁘀􀀋􀬀􀀉􀤀􀀊􀨀􀀒􁈀􀀂􀈀􀀁􀅐
Page 2 of 2