VIA Technologies, Inc, a leading innovator of power efficient x86 processor platforms, today announced the VIA VN1000 digital media chipset for next generation desktop and all-in-one PCs, offering a world-class HD multimedia entertainment platform compatible with the advanced desktop features of Microsoft Windows 7.

The VIA VN1000 is the most power efficient DX10.1 digital media chipset available today, making it the perfect solution for next generation small form factor and all-in-one Windows 7 PCs that focus on entertainment, multimedia and touch screen capabilities. The DirectX 10.1 hardware environment provided by the VIA Chrome 520 IGP means Windows 7 users can enjoy a more fluid and visually enhanced desktop experience as well as the latest gaming titles.

The VIA VN1000 digital media chipset features the ChromotionHD 2.0 video processor to guarantee smooth playback of the latest Blu-ray titles with superb hardware acceleration of the most demanding H.264, WM9 and VC1 codecs over the latest display technologies, including Display Port and HDMI.

Paired with the new VIA VT8261 south bridge, the VIA VN1000 represents the most power-efficient DX10.1 compliant digital media chipset on the market, consuming up to 12 watts for both north and south bridges, making it a perfect choice for Windows 7 based mini desktop and all-in-one desktop PCs designs.

The VIA VN1000 supports DDR3 system memory at speeds of up to 1066MHz, one x8 lane and four x1 lane PCI Express II expansion slots, up to five PCI slots and a VIA Vinyl HD 8 channel audio codec. An IDE controller, support for up to four S-ATA II drives, SD/MMS/MMC card reader support and 12 USB 2.0 ports are supplemented with support for PS/2, SPI, GPIO and LPC technologies.

And this is why VIA cancelled their marriage with nVidia. Why buy an IGP from nVidia when they can make one of their own, more powerfull and equally power efficient?

A Nano 3000 CPU + Chrome 500 IGP should give Intel's CULV + GMA4500 a run for its money, and even the Congo platform (Athlon Neo + HD3200).
The increased CPU and GPU power should also be good for putting ION to a corner.

As for all the irony regarding the low fps, I've been playing lots of games with my Ahtlon Neo L310 and a Radeon HD3200. Lots of great and good looking games.

And how much for the CPU ?
Because my atom 230 based netbook is about 9W and will TOP Around 16W total according to linux...
And I guess this would equal a ion with atom 330 in processing power, right ?

It's actually refreshing to see VIA back in the game, I kinda missed them in a weird geeky way!
If this is on par with the offers from nVidia, AMD and Intel, this can only mean one thing: better competition and lower prices! Yay, consumer wins!

If I remember correctly, comparable to the Raden 4300 series. When ran at low resolutions and settings, many modern games could be fine. Think of it as possibly past gen console graphics / resolution? Dunno.

Source games should run pretty well on it; source would run on your toaster if you could port it.

If it's anything like the Chrome 4xx series though, the drivers need some more effort put into them.

If I remember correctly, comparable to the Raden 4300 series. When ran at low resolutions and settings, many modern games could be fine. Think of it as possibly past gen console graphics / resolution? Dunno.

Source games should run pretty well on it; source would run on your toaster if you could port it.

If it's anything like the Chrome 4xx series though, the drivers need some more effort put into them.

The discrete 5x0 series cards were competitive with the 4350 and in the case of the GTX version was slightly faster, but this is not the discrete version. In the end I think this and a nano 3000 will be between a netbook and a intel culv/gma4500 or amd neo platform setup in terms of performance. Drivers will almost undoubtably be less mature than both other platforms, though it may be comparable to GMA drivers.

It's really nice to see that VIA is still trying to be a contender, but they need to get their hardware into some netbooks and nettops to show what it can do. Numbers and press releases are fine and good, but people won't start buying them until they're available somewhere.

Case in point, I wanted to buy a discrete 5x0 series Chrome card for some testing and overclocking, but can't for the life of me find one for sale anywhere. Not newegg, not ebay, not even the S3 store (which actually has NO products in stock). They may have once been in stock, but they can't compete now if they're not even available. There are at least a select few nano netbook options, but event they are fairly scarce now.

The discrete 5x0 series cards were competitive with the 4350 and in the case of the GTX version was slightly faster, but this is not the discrete version. In the end I think this and a nano 3000 will be between a netbook and a intel culv/gma4500 or amd neo platform setup in terms of performance.

But as you certainly know not all shaders are created equal and the same goes for CPU architectures. I also don't really know where you found the numbers for the shader clocks, they may very well be running faster than the core speed, but the discrete chrome 530 gt is clocked at 625MHz so I'd expect the core speed to be lower than that in an IGP. You've also got the shared memory bus (despite it being dual channel DDR3.... potentially as it supports from single channel ddr2 to dual channel ddr3), so it's not going to have anywhere near the bandwidth of this discrete card, which in gaming situations looses out to the lowest end discrete cards from it's competitors.http://forums.s3chromezone.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=591

I know it's conjecture to say that the discrete version is slower than it's discrete competitors so the integrated version would follow in suit, but I don't think it's entirely inaccurate. The ION has the strongest GPU of them with a 9400M class IGP, while AMD's HD3200 integrated probably looses out (but a slightly upclocked 4200 may be plenty to beat it). That being said, we're considering platforms, and the Nano is an Atom competitor, not a CULV/Neo competitor. While it is computationally faster clock for clock than an atom (some benchmarks say by a fair amount, most say by a little) the Neo and CULV chips are based of of *real* desktop architectures.... so they will be much more computationally capable and number crunching is what you need for multimedia.

In other words, no clear winner comes out on top for these platforms, intel and AMD's options can duke it out for overall computational power while the ION takes the cake for graphics horsepower. Still if they can get a decent price, good availability, and decent drivers VIA will at least be a competitor this time around.

Also I thought the ION could do DDR3 (and could do dual channel) but it wasn't being implemented much in the marketplace.

And how much for the CPU ?
Because my atom 230 based netbook is about 9W and will TOP Around 16W total according to linux...
And I guess this would equal a ion with atom 330 in processing power, right ?