Dental therapists don’t receive as much training as a dentist. But they can perform some of the same basic services — such as pulling teeth and filling cavities — under the supervision of a dentist.

In Minnesota and Alaska, the two states that have practicing dental therapists so far, some of the therapists are able to take their work on the road, traveling to rural areas to treat those who have little or no access to dentists — or who have limited dental coverage. The dental therapists charge less than dentists and are able to take all types of insurance, including Medicaid and Medicare.

I don’t see why more states don’t start adopting these practices, especially as it makes complete sense for care in rural areas where people don’t care dental care access and can’t afford to pay a dentist.

All jesting aside, you make some excellent – albeit intuitively obvious – points. If you increase the supply of a good or service, then (ceteris paribus) the price for that good or service will decrease. Specifically, dentists and dental therapists do not provide the same service, but rather supplementary services. The results, however, are the same.

If the tooth fairy is okay with this move, so am I. Something similar should be adopted to health care at large, specifically, nurses should be allowed to treat patients with non-acute conditions. Doing so, frees up other physicians in dealing with more acute conditions.

As long as it benefits the ones with more limited access to care, I don’t see what the inconvenience is. Those who can afford to pay a dentist for their services, then have the option of doing so. Let those with limited coverage be able to at least receive basic care from these therapists. Better that than nothing, right?

Most of us would go to the dentist more often if it was easier to do, and the cost was lower. I’ve spent many thousands on my teeth. Hew much better it would have been to have easier access to a dental therapist.