Anna Raccoon Archives

Post navigation

So, it was Rape!

The Anna Raccoon Archives

by Anna Raccoon on October 24, 2009

There are powerful biological reasons why women fear rape. There are equally powerful biological reasons why men protect their womenfolk from rape. We have an inbuilt instinct to ensure that the food supply will support all our offspring, our menfolk want to ensure that the value of the fruits of their labour is not diluted by being handed out to cuckoos in their nest.

We have, through evolution, developed an intricate ‘dance’ to take the fears inherent in ‘rape’ out of the sexual equation. Men are exhorted to ‘give us time’, and to use that time to reassure us that we will be protected whilst vulnerable, to work towards increasing the food supply, to extol the benefits of increasing the ‘family’; with patience, soft lighting and gentle words, we can be persuaded that the act we feared on a cold hard garage floor by force could actually be beneficial to us, we might even enjoy it!

Thus has the population increased over the centuries. Until Nu-Labour came to power.

Last night, Andrew Neather, broke ranks to reveal the rape at the heart of Nu-Labour’s pathological desire for power and control. We were forced to increase our population by 3 million migrant workers in a deliberate act for cynical political reasons.

“Labour ministers deliberately encouraged mass immigration to diversify Britain over the past decade, a former Downing Street adviser has claimed.”

We have been told time and again of the benefits of past immigration. Jack Straw proudly parades his immigrant background, though I am not sure that Jack Straw is the finest advertisement for immigration.

We have been told we are frigid ‘racists’ for resisting this latest invasion of the body Britannic. We have been insulted as fascists – ‘closet Lesbians’. Laws have been passed to make it illegal for us to complain.

We, in turn, have rejected the offspring, we resent the cost of feeding it, our menfolk grumble and threaten to abandon the family home altogether.

The British are not a naturally ‘racist’ race – how could we be? We are mongrels, all of us. When the MV Windrush arrived 60 years ago it carried just two women. 497 men. Those men created families here, so that today some 8,000 births a year are registered to those who describe themselves as of white/Caribbean descent.

It is not colour that we fear, it is an influx of people. It was noticeable on the infamous Question Time debate/star chamber that it was Jack Straw who tried to reduce the fledgeling conversation on immigration to one of colour, not Griffin.

It is said that Britain is more racially diverse than ever – I would dispute that – Britain is more obviously racially diverse than ever, because the newest incomers are more recognisably different by virtue of their colour, but Britain has always been racially diverse. We have historically had a tendency to absorb new arrivals rather than fight them to the death. We grew quite fond of the Vikings.

The only reason it has been different this time has been the Nu-Labour policy of emphasising our differences, rewarding a refusal to integrate, and trying to persuade us that the brutal act which took place on the political floor was the same as previous encounters undertaken after a gentle engagement. For this resistance, we have been labelled fascist.

For more than 70 years the left has hurled the ‘Fascist’ word at anyone who gets in its way. As early as 1946, George Orwell wrote that:

‘The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies “something not desirable”.

It’s ironic how the Left is always ready to brand a debater who steps off the politically correct reservation as a fascist, but sees nothing wrong with embracing concepts that fit neatly within the fascist ideal.

Economic growth and environmental regulations, socialised medicine and medical innovation, none of these things is at odds with one another so long as the right enlightened – Nu-Labour – geniuses are in power.

Across the Western world, the politically correct micro-managing of daily life continues to intensify. In Britain, closed-circuit cameras, once used in the name of security, are now used to police everything from dropping litter to eating in your car.

It’s also worth recalling that the mania sweeping Britain and parts of America for bans on tobacco, alcohol, fattening foods, non-organic foods and non-local foods has significant antecedents in Nazi ideology.

Hitler Youth manuals proclaimed that ‘nutrition is not a private matter’, a slogan that summarises vast swathes of the eco-Left’s propagandising. Hitler wanted to move the entire nation to vegetarianism as a response to the unhealthiness promoted by capitalism. Nazis were amongst the first to research organic foods and alternative medicines – Dachau boasted the world’s largest alternative medicine research lab. Heinrich Himmler was an animal rights activist and proponent of ‘natural healing’.

The fascists were amongst the first to cotton onto the idea of indoctrinating the children of the future. ‘Fear the adults, they are contaminated’, screams the current genre of publicity for paedophilia. Consider the present crop of TV advertising – children ‘frightened’ that their parents will die from smoking, or that ‘global warming’ may not have a happy ending – late last year, a British energy company created a website to teach children how to become ‘climate cops’ and turn in their own parents. Mussolini cast himself as a ’schoolmaster’ to the nation, while in the Soviet Union a prize was given by the State in honour of a boy who informed against his mother and father.

A YouGov poll was held hours after the Griffin/Question Time debacle, it found that 1 in 5 voters would seriously consider voting for the BNP in a future local, general, or European election. More than half of those questioned said they agreed with the BNP, or thought that it “had a point” in wishing to “speak up for the interests of the indigenous, white British people … which successive governments have done far too little to protect.” This included 43 per cent who said that, while they shared some of its concerns, they had “no sympathy for the party itself”.

We have been raped by a fascist dogma, it is time to hold the perpetrators to account, and place the Fascist label firmly where it belongs: on Nu-Labour.

“speak up for the interests of the indigenous, white British people …”

Given that we Celts were here first, does that mean that we can tell everyone else to **** off back to Italy, Scandinavia, France, or wherever else they originally came from? Loblocks – these individuals have every right to argue for the protection of British citizens by a British government, but that includes everyone, not just the “white” ones. That’s what the morons in the BNP fail to understand and that’s why they’ll continue to remain little more than an embarassing boil on the arse of British politics – as my late father used to say, “you can’t polish a turd”.

Those of us who worked there knew the Borders Agency has never been fit for fucking purpose. Many of us put it down to unbelievable levels of incompetence and corruption. Now we find out it was a conscious decision!?

The descent into serfdom has been going on for forty years at least. I first realised how right Orwell’s remark was when I became a student leader at University in 1968, and told a mass meeting that there was little discernible difference between Mao and Hitler. “Fascist!” they all yelled, after I had attacked two fascists. I agree this isn’t about colour, but lest we forget, 78% of indigenous Brits of ALL colours declared their desire late last year for an immediate end to all immigration. At this time, such a thought was on the agenda of a small minority of MPs like Frank Field; a year earlier, the Parliamentary ‘panel’ research showed that the issue wasn’t on the radar at all. Out of touch or what? Hain has misread all the research data following the show – and completely ignored the wishes of viewers, which outnumbered his by 3 to 1. And finally…..it isn’t that Hain fears the BNP – he fears that ordinary voters might go to the BNP. Like all those involved in the New Label project, he unconsciously gives away his utter disrespect for the ordinary elector. He may be right about it, but his hypocrisy and blame-dodging is sickening.

NuLabour & that useless tosser Jack Straw (’I’m a 3rd generation immigrant’ – that’s enough to damn immigration forever in my view) backed up by Tango Man Hain couldn’t have done more to promote the BNP cause if they’d tried. After QT & now this disclosure by Andrew Neather, the ranks of BNP voters (not members as many people are fearful of being publically connected with the BNP but will vote for them in the privacy of the polling booth) will swell as never before. NuLabour’s policies are coming home to roost. BTW, love the photo Anna.

Well-written article, for which I thank you, and an interesting metaphor. In answer to Vimes: if he is a Celt, then he is an immigrant too. Who is speaking up for the poor downtodden Neolithic farmers that he and his kind obliterated? To pull up the drawbridge and say that anyone coming to this country after such-and-such a year is an immigrant and those who were here before are indigenous is a ridiculous argument, whether it is made by Griffin or a Celt. However, it is fair to say that all previous waves of immigration, whether peaceful or violent, have ended in assimilation – from the Celts to the Anglo-Saxons to the Vikings to the Huguenots to the West Indians – and a happy and more diverse society has been the result. But they have all been characterised by ultimate integration. At the end of all of these processes, the immigrants have felt and declared themselves to be British. The native British, in their turn, have been remarkably tolerant and welcoming, provided that the integration has happened at a reasonable pace.

This is the first wave of immigration which has (we now learn) been done deliberately by the rulers, without the consent of the people, and with the aim of creating separate, isolated communities rather than integration, at a pace that is intolerable from a resource point of view, and with the added insult of demonising anyone who dared to complain or even discuss it. And all for the sake of ‘rubbing the Right’s nose in diversity’. If this country is ripped apart by civil war in 30 years’ time, we shall know who to blame.

I am beyong angry about this, and for the first time in my entire life I feel I could respond with violence. Not against the poor bloody immigrants – against my Government.

“To pull up the drawbridge and say that anyone coming to this country after such-and-such a year is an immigrant and those who were here before are indigenous is a ridiculous argument, whether it is made by Griffin or a Celt.”

I agree, Richard – I was being ironic, but perhaps not clearly enough. To put it into persepective, I am Welsh, as is Joe Calzaghe (white, Italian ancestry) and Colin Jackson (black, Jamaican ancestry) – which of us should be most deserving of government protection, according to the “indigenous, white British” criteria and given our achievements to date?

For goodness sake, new comers to this island have never been welcomed with open arms, Britain is an island and treats every new face suspiciously. Huguenots were the first to be subjected to a ‘british’ welcome by having their windows broken and being spat at in the street. The workforce, we were so desperately in need of, who arrived on the Windrush were treated terribly on their arrival. If voters in their droves vote for BNP, what exactly are they expecting them to do for britain ? Chuck out, of Britain, everybody without the ability to burn, after 5mins in the sun unprotected ? The shame about this issue is the failure to report the ebb and flow through our ports.

“So, it was rape!” or “So, it WAS rape!”? Has John Gardner’s pure defiler escaped his preordained fate at the hands of an inevitably immigrant London Transport driver and told you, or did you suspect a crime had been committed all along?

I think you were suspicious: you had, after all, noticed the itinerant trespassers – the phallus of a rampant tyrant dehumanizing and objectifying the very human body of the Indigenous Brits. But is that what you really witnessed?

Something happened. You saw the trespassers, and you now know the tyrant’s motives were not pure. But was it rape? I suggest it was not. I suggest that what you witnessed was an immoral breach of a planning regulation which removed the Indigenous Brits’ proprietary interest in a view for which they had developed a fondness. Social Engineering? Certainly, but so is planning regulation.

You might wonder why I have chosen to invade this sanctuary of elegant literature with my nit-picking ramblings. After all, you can see I acknowledge there has been a breach. Well, it’s simply to say that my Indigenous Brit is too strong to be violated by the loss of a minor proprietary interest and not sufficiently Americanized to treat property as an extension of self. In short, my Brit is cross about the cheating, but doesn’t cry rape. Perhaps it’s the Gallic influence in your Brit.

Finally, please don’t worry about the tyrant’s fascist tendencies: there remains a sufficient spirit of anarchy in the Brit. Just look at what those British Travelers did to the people of Blackmore. But hold on, perhaps they’re guilty of………..