A comparison of the French Revolution to the Patriot Act

Contempt
for the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities and of corruption
of governments. This is from the
French Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen, although it sums up the ideals
of all who strive for a fair and just government. Through out history, many groups of people have strived to
create a perfect society, while many others have sought to gain power and exploit
their fellow man. During the
French revolution, those with societies best interests at heart created a
document that they thought would secure societies rightful freedoms,
unfortunately, they made several mistakes that allowed those with malicious
intents to take power and be nearly unstoppable. A singly entity should not be able to obtain a great level
of power, this has been proven in the past, and society must work to make sure
it is not proven again.

It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. Voltaire said this, voicing his
feelings that he lived under a repressive government. He said this before the French Revolution. The revolution began in order to combat
inequality, its goals being to create a fair governing body under which all
people could live freely and happily.
Those who created the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen though
that they had achieved this goal, when in reality they had only managed to
create a shield for those with power to stand behind. On a first reading of this document, it seems that it will
protect society from a cruel government by creating several inalienable
rights. Upon closer inspection, it
is evident that although it might look good, the document is useless, and it
might even help the government to be worse than it was before. The first major problem with the
document is that it presents many rights to the people, but still allows
society to be exploited by leaving many loopholes. To preserve freedom of speech, it states “No one shall be
disquieted on account of his opinions… provided their manifestation dos not
disturbed the public order established by law.” Before, if someone spoke out against the government, they
would be punished, now they would only be punished if the disturbed the publics
order. Unfortunately, the
government, the very group that was spoken out against in the first place,
defines “public order”. This means
that a person has no greater rights then they did before, it only appears that
they do, and even if the people have more rights, the governments power is not
checked in any way. Similar
loopholes also negate nearly all the other effects of the Declaration of Rights
of Man. In order to protect this
new “freedom”, the Committee of Public Safety was created, they were given
absolute power to protect society and their freedoms in any way necessary. This group took the most extreme
measures to “protect society.
Anyone who spoke out against the government was considered a threat and
was executed. The COPS made the
biggest threat against freedom the government itself, and it destroyed what it
was trying to protect. Robespierre, the head of the COPS, became so consumed in
making sure that the government was secure, he forgot that the very point of
the revolution was to help society, and he was a major factor against
society. These events show how
when unchecked, power corrupts, and there must be means to make sure that power
is used properly.

Those
who are willing to sacrifice basic freedoms for a little temporary security
deserve neither. Benjamin Franklin
believed that a government should only protect its people to the point before
it begins to take freedoms. The
Patriot Act, as well as the upcoming Patriot act II, server to disarm the
public of their freedoms in the name of public safety and the flag. The very name of the bills attempt to
make them seem as if they are the American way, and that those who may oppose
them are in fact working against the country. The truth is that the bills are themselves un-American, as
America was founded on the principles of freedom and equality, even as the
bills move towards the abolishment of these principles, their supports make it
seem as if they are defending Americas freedoms. Many conservatives will say that what makes America great is
the higher standard of living, and the un-oppressed and free lives Americans
lead. Few people will argue
this. The Patriot act is only
working to destroy what America stands for, the logic being that it is the only
way to keep society safe. But what
is the point of maintaining a society if its very foundation has been
destroyed? Conservative logic
seems to be saying that in order to defend something, we must make it a shamble
of its former self in order to make it easier to defend. Although, there is not point in
destroying what you love in order to maintain a memory of it, when you can
simply keep it in its current state.
Whatever greater threats freedom may bring from the outside, the lack of
freedom brings an infinitely greater risk from within.

Those
who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. It seems that America is now at a
parallel point in history as to when France was at the time the COPS were put
into power. France was at a point
were they freed that the physical safety of the country was in trouble, and they
wanted to protect the newfound rights that their revolution had so recently
afforded them. In America, many
people feel that the country is in danger from a newfound enemy, terrorists. One common opinion is that the only way
to be safe from this threat is to give the government an unprecedented level of
power and control over the people in order to root out this threat, and
hopefully avert any future terrorists actions, at the sacrifice of the rights
of the average citizen. In many
ways, both means of protection, the COPS and the Patriot acts, inadvertently
become their own worst enemy. Both
take protective measures to an extreme, and in doing so give a great level of
unchecked power. In France, this
power destroyed many liberties.
The patriot acts themselves take away many civil rights, and by doing so
allow the government to exploit society.
The COPS lead to a dictatorship, and with the Patriot Act, it is easy to
see how something similar could happen, the most sure way to stop this is to
make sure that a group does not come into unchecked power, and that a group is
not checking itself.