Cecily BondJAMS Kangaroo Court judge
"I strongly believe that the great majority of litigants would prefer to be directly
involved in the prompt resolution or settlement of their claims so as to avoid the stress
and costs of trial. Effective dispute resolution can achieve this goal."Even after there was already a trial?

"You want control over
the process, confidentiality
and closure. That is when you choose arbitration.
That is when you need JAMS. "JAMS/Endispute
website

At the climactic ending to an 8 year legal ordeal for 21 year Amway/Quixtar distributor
Diamond Bruce Anderson is placed in double
jeopardy by JAMS/Endispute.

Anderson prevailed in a suit in the 17th Judicial Circuit court in Broward
County Florida in June 2003 against double diamond Hal Gooch. Before Anderson
prevailed, Amway's arbitrators, JAMS had refused to arbitrate the case. After
Gooch loses the dispute, Quixtar lobbies JAMS to retry the case in JAMWAY private
court. JAMS later claims jurisdiction and retries the case.

Instead of keeping the $301,000 judgement, which a REAL Florida court with a REAL
judge, awarded him, the self appointed JAMWAY kangaroo court judge, Cecily Bond from the arbitration company JAMS/Endispute, reverses
the decision in 3 hours and assess a $729,000 judgement
against Anderson.

The Quixtar Arbitration
Agreement"The Court also finds that any
agreement of Plaintiffs to arbitrate under the Amway Rules of Conduct is not valid for a
second reason -- unconscionability . . . "The Honorable Richard E. Door
US District Court
Western District of, Missouri

Other

Jerry Springerassess the risk of bringing Anderson, Gooch and Grider on
his show

The Quixtar Steam Shovelstarting to bury itself

The story line as best I can construct it from Mr. Anderson's
website.

This whole thing should be televised on the Jerry Springer show. We need to get
them all (sans poor Anderson) up on stage so they can throw folding chairs at each other!

The Amway Video Gold Mine

It all started in the early 1990's with Lee Luster, a videographer, who made
"Diamond lifestyle" videos in conjunction with various Diamond distributors.
The videos contained popular rock music. The videos were to be sold to all
the Amway Diamond wann-a-bees, and to also be shown on the video projection screens at the
major Amway functions. Basically the videos were to show the supposed riches the Amway
business could supply. The riches in fact came from things like selling these
videos and motivational tapes. Mr. Luster first worked for Tim Foley in
1991. Luster was later introduced to Randy Haugen in 1992 and then to Bruce Anderson
in January of 1993. After a few run-ins and some information about Luster's
checkered past in Las Vegas (article 1, article 2), Luster's services were discontented by Foley,
Haugen and Anderson. Luster subsequently went to work for double diamond Hall
Gooch in March of 1993 with Luster moving in Gooch's home for about one year. They
worked closely together on all the video projects. The videos were a hit.
They sold well and they had a big impact at the major functions.

The Baboon Got Shot

In 1994 Gooch and Luster had a falling out for an unknown reason. In the process of
this falling-out, Gooch sued Luster on August 17, 1994 in Florida state court for various
things. Luster filed an ugly counter
claim (text file)
against Gooch.

Luster's strong hand against Gooch was his possession of a compromising video from a
Gooch African hunting safari where Gooch had shot a black baboon, supposedly a protected
species. Luster also had possession of a collection of family videos from Gooch's
downline diamonds, which were being used to create all the Diamond Lifestyle videos.

In Luster's complaint it stated that Parker Grabill subsequently made a racist remarks about the dead baboon being Jesse
Jackson. According to Luster's complaint, "Gooch then chimed in, and he has fingers
and a peeter like a little black boy!!" Who
knows what other activity was recorded on this video. It also not known who else was
on the hunting safari. I would guess there was much more in the video than what
Luster's complaint details. This video is probably the root of the whole 13 year
fiasco.

The Gooch v. Luster suit and counter suit were not settled until over 6 years later on
November 20, 2000 when a settlement agreement was
signed. The settlement agreement was a bit premature as Mr. Gooch's deal included
property that did not belong to him. More on this later.

Luster Blows the Whistle

Luster blew the whistle and turned everybody in to the recording industry for the music
copyright violations on the Diamond videos. The money making party was over.
Why Luster turned them in is unknown. Perhaps it was due to the suit Gooch had
filed against him. Given Luster's checked past, it would not surprise me if he
wanted to blackmail Gooch to keep it all a secret or to keep the baboon video
secret. In 1996 the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the National Music Publishers Association (NMPA) filed the largest copyright lawsuits in history
against Amway and numerous diamond distributors for the illegal usage of popular rock
music on the diamond videos. According to a conversation I had with Luster, Amway settled the suits for several million dollars. The
recording industry suits officially settled in April of 1998. None of the diamonds
wanted their financial information or the Gooch video clip to be made public so it was
best to settle before detailed discovery. There were at least 110 copyright
violations from Gooch alone. Luster was critical in giving all the
copyright violations to the RIAA, and was basically granted immunity by the RIAA in
exchange for his help. The RIAA received $9 million, and the NMPA
settled their $2.5 million lawsuit
for $700,000.

The "Hunt" to Get Luster

In January of 1999 a "hunting party", composed of Bruce Anderson, Randy
Haugen, Parker Grabill, Tim Foley, and Hal Gooch, was formed to go get Luster. In
the case known as "Foley
v. Luster", Luster was sued by the "hunting party" to have Luster
indemnify their legal costs from RIAA and NMPA suits. Since Luster got off
scott-free, the "hunting party" didn't want Luster to come away without at least
a bloody nose and any possibly of getting money from the RIAA for his help. The
diamonds also wanted to take any money Luster might have had as punishment for getting
them into this fiasco. After all they claim it was Luster's fault the
copyrighted music was on the videos. In this suit Anderson, Haugen, and Grabill won,
Gooch and Foley lost. Another reason for the "hunting party" against
Luster was to provide Gooch cover in the ugly counter
claim suit Luster had open. If the "hunting party"
won against Luster, they might be able to trade their winnings for Luster's embarrassing
suit against Gooch. In April of 1999 Anderson, Haugen, Grabill received a judgement
against Luster for $241,000, which was their attorney's fees in the RIAA case.
But, Luster didn't have any money. Gooch and Foley lose in this action because they
worked together too long and had known that there were copyright infringements.

The Secret Action

On March 17, 2000 Gooch's attorney, McDonald, filed a new
case in Broward county, copying Anderson's attorney, Donald Christopher. The action
was to seize whatever property Luster owned to settle the judgments from the "Foley
v. Luster" case. The demand was $254,000. According to Anderson, only
Parker Grabill's signature was used to start the investigation into what assets Luster
might have had. Grabill's signature was used since McDonald was also Parker
Grabill's attorney and Grabill was loyal to Gooch and in Gooch's downline. Gooch had
no legal claim against Luster and could not legally start this action. Since
Luster's counter suit against Gooch was a potential asset, it was seized. The
implementation of this action was unknown to Anderson and resulted in a "Order for
Chose in Action" from judge Berry Seltzer. The "Chose in Action
Order" could disarm Luster by seizing his claims and taking ownership of his counter
suit against Gooch.

In August of 2000 Anderson's attorney replies to a Gooch request asking how much money
Anderson wanted to sell Gooch the Anderson's judgements against Luster. Gooch never
replies to their request that they would like their attorney's costs of at least $74,000
reimbursed.

The Ruby Slippers

On September 6th, 2000 unbeknownst to Anderson, but known to all the attorneys
involved, the Florida court (judge Seltzer) awarded Anderson, and Haugen a "Order for Chose in Action". This order
turns out to be the "ruby slippers"
for the whole case. Since Luster has no money, the only thing of value he has is the
embarrassing law suit against Gooch. So Anderson and Haugen are substituted
in for Luster and they now own the 3 main counts of Luster's suit against
Gooch. Any settlement that Luster would win from Gooch would go to Anderson and
Haugen. The "Chose in Action" would have allowed Anderson and Haugen
to legally take over Luster's suit against Gooch and at the same time make Luster pay the
legal fees.

The court sent Donald Christopher (Anderson's attorney), Stephen McDonald
(Gooch's/Grabill's attorney), Martin Sperry (Luster's attorney) and Thomas Abrams
(Luster's second attorney) copies of the "Chose in Action" order. Parker
Grabill however mysteriously does not show up on the Chose in Action Order.

Anderson did not find about the "Chose in Action Order" until preparing for
Quixtar arbitration in 2004 after he was sent a CD-ROM with all the case documentation on
it. This will not be the first time Anderson's attorney Donald Christopher, is caught
intentionally working against his client.

Luster Gets Squeezed Out of the Picture

On August 4th, 2000 Luster's attorneys Sperry and Kashi apply to the court to drop
their client. Sperry and Kashi probably run since they know the "Chose in
Action Order" is coming and they have no leverage left on Gooch. Luster
remarks in a letter to judge Henning that he hasn't been billed for by Sperry or Kashi for
the last three years. It might have been that Sperry and Kashi were working on
contingency hoping for millions in legal blackmail to keep Gooch's baboon video in the
closet. Luster claims that Sperry and Kashi threatened to drop him if he did not
settle the Gooch v. Luster case under the terms that their firm wanted.

After the September 6, 2000 "Order for Chose in Action", Luster was disarmed
once and for all. Anderson, and Haugen unknowingly own the most important
counts of Luster's counter claim against Gooch. If Luster was using the suit
to blackmail Gooch about the Baboon video, he can no longer legally get away with it.
Luster just had the wind taken out of his sails, and has no options anymore, so
they started discussions about a settlement.

On October 19, 2000 Gooch and Luster signed a settlement
agreement. Gooch was to pay $20,000 for Luster's attorney fees
to Sperry, and to "satisfy" the $241,000 judgements owed Anderson,
Haugen and Grabill. In exchange, Luster would drop his suit and return all raw
video footage and any copies of videos he had. Gooch would have to deliver to Luster
satisfaction of Anderson's claims to finally fulfill the settlement agreement.

The settlement agreement mentions a subpoena whereby all the raw video footage was
turned over to Donald Christopher, Anderson's attorney who was working for
Amway at this time as well. The subpoena was issued by the United States
District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Amway's District). It was noted
that the videos would be given to the RIAA. This is quite
strange since the RIAA suit was settled in 1998 and it is 2000 at the time of the
Gooch/Luster settlement agreement. It is also stranger since the RIAA would
have no use for the raw uncut video as it would not yet contain any of their copyrighted
music. I would assume instead that Amway issued the subpoena through Donald Christopher
under the cover of the P&G, Schwartz lawsuit. Christopher was issuing subpoenas
for Amway as early as Feb. 1999 in the P&G, Schwartz lawsuit. I presume
Christopher is actually fishing here for Amway to get copies of the raw unedited video
from Luster into Amway's control for potential use against Gooch should leverage be needed
in the future.

Gooch Defaults on the Settlement Agreement

On February 9, 2001 Gooch makes an offer to buy Anderson's and Haugen's judgements for
just $10,000. Anderson refuses since his costs were at least $74,000. On
February 14, 2001 Parker Grabill registers his claims against Luster with the court as
"satisfied". Since Anderson's judgements are still not satisfied five
months after the settlement agreement, Gooch is ruled to have breached the settlement
agreement with Luster.

Due to Gooch's default, on May 21, 2001 the Florida 17th Judicial Circuit
court (judge Henning) awards Luster with a $241,000 judgement against Gooch, which is the
same amount Luster owes to Anderson for the judgement.

Also, on May 21, 2001, McDonald, Gooch's lawyer, makes a last minute failed attempt to
annul the default judgement against Gooch. McDonald claims that Luster never made
good on his agreement to:
1) Provide an inventory list of the raw videos in his possession, and the tapes
themselves.
2) Not do distribute copies of the video tapes, when in fact he had since made
copies that were given to Amway/Quixtar.

McDonald was too late and the court did not accept his motion.

Despite the fact that Gooch made hundreds of thousands, if not millions, on all the
video sales, he was too greedy or cheap to buy out Anderson's share of the costs ($74,000)
to prevent the ensuing fiasco.

Luster and Anderson Stalled Out

At this point Luster owes Anderson and Huagen $241,000 and can't pay. Gooch
owes Luster $241,000, and won't pay.

The judgement against Gooch is meaningless unless it is enforced. Luster
has no motivation or money to enforce the judgement since he will not keep any of the
money. The parties are effectively stalled out. The only one sitting well is
Hal Gooch. He hasn't paid Anderson anything and is now rid of the embarrassing
Luster counter suit. None of the attorney's own up to the fact that the "Order
for Chose in Action" exists and that Anderson could legally collect straight from
Gooch. This appears to be the secret conspiracy to stall the whole situation and
hopefully just have it die off.

Anderson's Wild Goose Chase

Anderson, not seeing any progress in Luster getting the money from Gooch, and not
knowing he actually has the "Chose in Action"
oreder, was badly advised by his attorney, Donald Christopher, to seek collections against
Gooch in North Carolina in Luster's name and pay for the attorney. Anderson was
basically advised to go to North Carolina, get a sheriff and start taking stuff from
Gooch's property! This turned out to be a wild goose chase wasting $25,000 as
Anderson already possessed the "ruby slippers",
which was the "Chose in Action order" in Florida. Not only did
the North Carolina action waste a lot of money, it made Anderson look bad in front of the
other Quixtar diamonds on the IBOA borad, who would later handle the Quixtar conciliation
processes. Gooch escaped collections in North Carolina by posting a bond in Florida
in March of 2002.

Anderson's attorney, Donald Christopher, kept Anderson in the dark about the
"Chose in Action Order" for 3 1/2 years. Christopher denied knowing about
the order, but years later a tale-telling itemization in Christopher's billing for
September 11, 2000 was found. The billing noted that Christopher spent six
minutes and charged $22.50 for reading the "Chose in Action Order".

Gooch Brings in Quixtar "to Fix Things"

On April 18, 2002 Hal Gooch initiated formal conciliation
proceedings with Quixtar. On October 11, 2002 a formal conciliation was scheduled.
Bruce Anderson cooperated in the non-binding conciliation under protest, without prejudice
to contest the legitimacy of those proceedings, as the matter had nothing to do with
Quixtar or the IBO plan. Anderson was crossline from Gooch and had no business
in BSM's or product volume with Gooch. Technically there was no reason to ask
Quixtar to intervene with conciliation or arbitration since the mater was totally separate
from the Quixtar business. On January 22, 2003 the IBOAI members from the formal
conciliation cannot make a recommendation as to who is right.

On February 23, 2003 Gooch's attorney, McDonald, files a motion "For Relief From
Final Judgement" in the Florida 17th Judicial Circuit court on the
argument that Anderson was to give Gooch his judgements for
satisfaction against Luster. McDonald now accuses Anderson of breaching a verbal
agreement with Gooch ("Gooch pays half and gets everything") and the court
should rule that Mr. Anderson should give Gooch the judgements. According to
Anderson, there was never any agreement between Gooch and Anderson for the relinquishing
of his judgements.

Gooch claims there was an agreement between Gooch and Anderson where Gooch could
"use" Anderson's claims against Luster in exchange for Gooch paying 1/2 of the
legal fees to pursue Luster. Accordingt to Anderson, Gooch never paid any of the
legal fees until the "Foley v. Luster" case was over in May 1999 and the winners
were clear. Since Parker Grabill received a $30,000 judgement, they would
have to pay their share of the legal costs, or lose Parker's benefits.

Accordingt to Anderson, if there ever was an unwritten agreement, Anderson wanted to be
paid at least his remaining cost for the claims (his legal fees in the case "Foley v.
Luster") if Gooch wanted to "have" them. Gooch contends that he
paid half, about $60,000, so he should get the full benefit of their $240,000 value.
There was unfortunately no written contract about any "deal". This is now
the sticking point for the rest of the fiasco.

Gooch's logic is something akin to two people splitting the cost of a lottery ticket,
and one person only having the right to take all the winnings. It would have been
illogical for Anderson to accept such a deal on Gooch's terms since he would always pay
half the costs, but never have a right to any of the benefits. No one but a fool
would make this kind of a deal.

Anderson's opinion is that the IBOA board put pressure on Haugen, and Haugen got out by
giving his claims to Anderson. This left Anderson pitted against Gooch for
final settlement of Gooch's and Luster's Florida state actions.

After losing the
first two appeals, Gooch finally requested the Florida State Court to stay all proceedings
in May of 2003. For the first time in almost two years, Hal Gooch argued that his dispute
with Bruce Anderson was somehow a Quixtar related matter that was subject to binding
arbitration, and that the Florida State Court should decline to hear any further matters
in the case. Gooch can't get satisfaction in a real court, so he will get things fixed in
the JAMWAY kangaroo court by pulling strings in Quixtar.

As it turns later out, unbeknownst to
Anderson, his attorney is also working for Quixtar, which now is seen as a severe conflict
of interest. Evidence on the Internet shows Donald Christopher ordering a Feb, 1999 Amway/Quixtar subpoena to a
Florida anti-Amway website owner, John Hogland in the P&G/Schwartz suit on behalf of
Amway Corporation. Ironically the subpoena requests hits on Hogland's computer
relevant to "Anderson" and "Arista".
I also obtained a subpoena in
March of 2000 requesting the same search terms of "Anderson", and
"Arista" for the P&G, Schwartz case. Is Christopher and Amway/Quixtar
fishing the waters to see how much the internet confederates know of the impending
Anderson fiasco?

The motion for relief goes to trial on June 23, 2003 in Florida. Anderson claims
his attorney, Donald Christopher
perjures himself in court when he is asked about Anderson's rights to Luster's
settlement, which is the "Chose in Action" that Anderson still did not know
existed. McDonald mentions in the trial the issue of mandatory conciliation and the
Quixtar arbitration process. This gets judge Henning nervous and she decides not to
make a judgement until jurisdiction for arbitration is made by JAMS.

By this time Anderson is out of money and owes Donald Christopher $20,000 for preparing
the documentation for the JAMS review. Anderson tells his attorney he is done and
wants out. Gooch can have what he wants. Christopher tells him to hang on.....
because Christopher still needs to get paid. Surprisingly JAMS/Endispute
sends a letter on August 6, 2003 JAMS denying arbitration after an additional $5,000 worth
of billing by Christopher for a letter to JAMS

Christopher argues in his letter to JAMS that if
this case is allowed to proceed to binding arbitration, what would inhibit any other case
between two unrelated IBOs to be tried in the JAMWAY kangaroo court?

Suppose an IBO's wife is killed by a drunk driving double diamond distributor (DD D DD)
with good contacts to Sharon Grider and the Quixtar legal department. The IBO sues the
Double Diamond for $1 million in damages. In theory, since both parties are IBOs
they must now conduct all their legal proceedings in the private rigged JAMWAY court, and
not the public court system, which is open and less biased. Obviously since the
whole process is rigged the IBO without the connections would lose the case. When he
loses, JAMS will also rule he has to pay the costs of the "winning" side.

Christopher sums up the case history pretty well in his letter
to JAMS. You might review it if you are confused by my summary of the
story.

On August 13, 2003, Quixtar chief counsel, Sharon Grider wrote JAMS still
endorsing arbitration for the case.

"The issue of whether JAMS has jurisdiction to administer an arbitration in
this matter was submitted to JAMS National Arbitration Committee (NAC) for review and
determination. The NAC is comprised of staff and JAMS General Counsel whose role is,
among other things, to rule on issues such as this arising in a case where there is no
arbitrator yet to make the decision.

The NAC representatives have determined that JAMS is unable to administer this
arbitration. It is JAMS policy that we will not administer an arbitration unless
both parties have consented to our involvement in the case. An arbitration agreement
exists between Bruce Anderson and Quixtar to resolve any claims arising out or relating to
Mr. Anderson's Independent Business (IB), the Independent Business Owner's (IBO) Plan, or
the Quixtar Rules of Conduct. In view of the fact that no such arbitration agreement
between Hal Gooch and Bruce Anderson, we cannot administer the arbitration at this time.

Erin MacEneaney
Arbitration Specialist

Anderson Prevails In a Real Court

On September 2, 2003 based upon the letter from JAMS, stating there will be no
arbitration, Judge Henning denies Gooch's motion for relief. Gooch loses in
court and now has to pay Anderson $292,000 from Gooch's Hartford Insurance bond in
Florida. The check gets cut and Anderson's attorney, Donald Christopher,
shaves off $52,000 for himself. Anderson sends Randy Haugen $50,000 of his costs
back. Anderson believes the key here is that without the JAMS letter, Christopher
would not have gotten paid. Anderson believes the only reasons for the positive
letter from JAMS was to assure Christopher's payment and get the case out of judge
Henning's court so that JAMS could take over. What results later only reinforces
that that suspicion. Haugen later feels sorry for Anderson and sends him a
check for $50,000. Later the check is un-collectable and stamped "payment
stopped".

The Quixtar Steam Shovel Goes into High Gear

Once Christopher gets paid, JAMS overturns their previous decision not to arbitrate the
case, despite the fact a real court already settled the issue. JAMS appoints
arbitrator Cecily Bond on October 23, 2003 as arbitrator of the case. Cecily Bond
also bills at the rate of $450/hour! No wonder she left public service. She
makes a lot more as a private judge, who is not required by JAMS rules to disclose if
anyone gives them money to swing a decision.

Anderson's attorney, Donald Christopher fails in his fiduciary duty to file a "Res Judicata" to protect his client
from having to try an already settled case again in arbitration. A "Res
Judicata" is the civil court equivalent of criminal court's "double
jeopardy" rule.

Donald Christopher announces to Anderson that he works for Amway/Quixtar and cannot
represent him at the arbitration. This leaves Anderson without experienced
representation to challenge the arbitration and for the representation at
arbitration. Anderson searches for a new attorney and is recommend attorney
Mike McCormick by his upline Randy Haugen, and Jody Victor. McCormick claimed to
have earned $1.7 million from the Morrision v. Amway case
as he defended Ra-Ji corporation
(now Alticor) and Dexter Yager.
McCormick commented on all the friends he has at Quixtar. Anderson is concerned that
McCormick might also have a conflict of interest with Quixtar and declines his services
after $20,000 in billing. Anderson suspects that all the attorneys he has contacted
are connected with Amway/Quixtar and are there to waste time and bleed his financial
resources. McCormick bills Anderson for 43.3 hour in one day ($8,660). Mike
McCormick fails in his fiduciary duty to file a "Res Judicata" to protect his
client from having to try an already settled case again in arbitration.

On November 18, 2003 17th Judicial Circuit court in Broward County Florida
also awards Anderson $48,760 in attorney's fees and costs in pursuing his collection on
Gooch.

YOU MUST ARBITRATE! YOU MUST ARBITRATE!

On December 10, 2003 Cecily Bond from JAMS determines that this dispute is covered by
the IBO BSMAA agreement and orders arbitration and
assumes jurisdiction. THERE WILL BE ARBITRATION despite the fact that
JAMS said previously there would be no arbitration, and the case was already
settled in Florida State court.

In January 2004, Anderson found the "Chose in Action" in an email from
Gooch's/McDonald's closing arguments of the June 23rd trial. It sat in his email inbox for
7 months until he printed the E-mail to prepare for arbitration. The date stamp has
been tampered with. Original version
.
Here is tampered version faxed
from Christopher on 7/9/2003

The Quixtar Steam Shovel Piles On The Dirt

On March 31, 2004 the Jamway Kangaroo court goes into action and Cecily
Bond orders Anderson to deposit the remaining $180,000 from Gooch's Bond payment in a
saving account for safe keeping with a $5,000 per day fine for non compliance.

On April 30, 2004 the Kangaroo court is held just for 3 hours, and Cecily Bond reverses the Florida 17th Judicial Circuit court decision,
which took years to obtain and withstood three appeals. JAMS assess Anderson over
$729,000! The verdict changes direction by a net sum of over $1,000,000.
Unlike a real court, there is no transcript of the arbitration proceedings.

Donald Christopher offers to come back to work for Anderson, if Anderson signs over the
Luster judgements to him as collateral for payment of future legal bills.

On December 3, 2004 Quixtar cuts off the Anderson's income with a garnishment order for
a default judgement from Hal Gooch from a Kent County Michigan case No. 04-05849-CZ.

In January 2005 Anderson learns that Gooch's attorney, Mr. West, is working the
arbitration on a contingency basis. It is a bit strange for an attorney to work on
contingency for cases like these unless he knows it is a sure thing. Maybe Mr. West
knows that Mr. Gooch has an a no lose situation in the JAMWAY court.

On February 18, 2005, Goochs' attorneys move to seize and sell Anderson's
"independent business" with Quixtar.

On March 10, 2005 Anderson makes an offer to
Quixtar to settle the issue. They do not reply and he decides to make the fact
public on his web site after March 16.

The Quixtar Steam Shovel Sinks in the Mud

In February, 2005 Anderson files a brief for suggestion of
impropriety and attempt to perpetrate a fraud on the Florida 17th Judicial Circuit court and a motion for sanctions. The hearing is scheduled for April,
21, 2005. Nothing positive happens for Anderson in the hearing.

March 26, 2005 Anderson turns everybody in like Luster did
with his website: http://www.baron55.com/, after trying to elicit help from Doug DeVos to reign in Quixtar's
out of control legal department. When nothing happened, he blew the whistle on the
whole affair. A couple of attorneys might get disbarred because of the improprieties
he exposes.

On April 1st, 2005 Anderson announces on his site that his
Amway/Quixtar business has been sold to Randy Haugen for just $350,000 even though
Anderson's annual taxable gross income from tools and Quixtar averaged $330,00/year for
the last five years. The money went straight to Gooch. Anderson still in
theory owes Gooch $380,000.

Anderson subsequently pays Gooch the remaining money in
$250,000 cash by cashing in his retirement funds to get them off his back.

.....and this all because of a dead baboon and a bunch of
home videos. There must be more to the baboon and home videos than what is mentioned
in Luster's counter suit. The company and JAMS have put their reputation on the
line in this cover up. Only time will tell if the whole story comes out in the
public. If you have any details write me.

Anderson's more detailed site is at: http://www.baron55.com/
This site was made for the insiders in the case and was not made at first for the
general public.

In the PG&E arbitration, Girardi, Masry and Lack
expected to settle the case against the utility for $400 million, according to a July 2,
1996, letter to their clients. The case was heard before a panel of retired judges in San
Francisco and Los Angeles.

The former judges who heard the case were all
employed by an Irvine arbitration company called JAMS/Endispute -- one of the biggest such
firms in the West. JAMS boasts about 300 arbitrators, including some of the more prominent
retired judges in California. But the firm has also seen some controversy in its 21-year
existence. In 1993, the then-chairman of JAMS, John Trotter, hired Michael Greer, a former
San Diego County Superior Court judge who at the time was being investigated for accepting
gifts from lawyers in his courtroom. Trotter publicly defended the hire, calling the
allegations against Greer "inconsequential and in some cases absurd." But in
March 1996, right before the PG&E settlement, the ex-judge pleaded guilty to
accepting $75,000 to rule favorably in cases before him. Greer eventually
testified against two judges in one of California's biggest judicial scandals.