A Case Study in Cyber Governance: Pitney Bowes

Is it implemented its wide-sweeping digital transformation strategy, Pitney Bowes had three priorities to consider — top-line growth, cost savings, and cybersecurity — but it only chose to prioritize two, leaving vulnerable its newly expanded threat surface. Company leadership only realized the impact of this error after having to announce two incidents, which reflect poorly on the brand and its technology management. This is why it’s critical for C-suites and Boards to have improved risk tools and metrics for the “age of digital transformation” to show that they are allocating capital in the best way.

About

Contacts

Follow us

Discover more

Cyberhedge Index Tickers

CBHUSSGUSA 5-Star Companies

CBHEUSGEU 5-Star Companies

CBHUSSBUSA 1-Star Companies

CBHEUSBEU 1-Star Companies

CBHUSAGUSA 5+4-Star Companies

CBHEUAGEU 5+4-Star Companies

All materials contained on this site are protected by copyright and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed or published without the prior written permission of Cyberhedge or in the case of third party materials, the owner of that content. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.

The Cyberhedge IndicesCookie Policy

What are the Cyberhedge Cyber Governance Indices?

These first ever benchmarks prove good cyber governance matters to shareholder value. They measure stock market performance of companies with good and with bad cyber governance scores. Scores are based on Cyberhedge’s proprietary cyber governance rating methodology. Market performance is tracked by an independent firm. The results show that companies with good cyber governance outperform their peers in US, UK, and EU markets.