Pity Farfur, the Palestinian version of "Micky Mouse" who has been killed off – beaten to death by an "Israeli agent"!

"Farfur was martyred defending his land," said the show’s presenter Saraa. Israeli critics had said the show was outrageous and some Palestinian ministers tried to get it shelved. In the final broadcast an actor said to be an Israeli agent tries to buy the land of the squeaky-voiced Mickey Mouse lookalike. Farfur brands theIsraeli a "terrorist" and is beaten to death. He was killed "by the killers of children", Saraa says.

Ah well, all’s well that ends well. Is there a more sick society than Pali-land?Wonder what will replace Farfur the Mouse, maybe Adolf the Dog?

I have been away all day and am just catching up on the latest news concerning the terror attack on Glasgow Airport in Scotland. My thanks to Alison for covering this story. Seems like the ROP has been very busy, little wonder that PM Gordon Brown declares the situation "critical" and urges the Nation to stand together.

Well, I have a few things to say on this.

1. Once more, we are reminded that just because many in the UK prefer to deny that militant Islam is at WAR with us does not change that fundamental reality. And it’s not JUST us in the UK that face this threat, a significant section within Islam is at war with all of us who will not submit to it. The only sensible response is to repeat an expression familiar to those of us who live in Northern Ireland – No Surrender.

2. Regrettably I see little sign of unity of purpose amongst the UK population. Encouraged by the MSM, the general mood is one of appeasement and even denial that we are even in the middle of the war on terror. Get out of Iraq, run away from Afghanistan, leave Iran alone, be nice to Hamas, turn a blind eye to the activities of our indigenous Islamic fanatics….so goes the defeatist drumbeat. And it encourages the Jihad boys. We need to be sending them a different message – namely that we will never submit to them and that we place a high value on our liberty.

3. At times like this, we do need to bare our teeth, and show Islam that we are the strong horse. Be it Glasgow, London, New York, Bali, Madrid – militant Islam seeks to KILL us. It seems to gain our submission through terrorising us. Well, let’s all stand together and tell Islam to take a hike, all the way to paradise.

Yesterdays nightclub plots ‘coincided’ with Mr Justice Astill jailing for life the terror cell that plotted to blow up the Ministry of Sound ("dancing slags") nightclub and Bluewater shopping centre. Khyam, Waheed Mahmood, Garcia, Akmed and Amin refused to enter court to be sentenced for life with no parole for at least 20 years.

Times reports that ‘The conspiracy that led to a jury deliberating for 27 days, the longest in British criminal trial history, had started in November 2003, with the purchase of the ammonium nitrate fertiliser that was central to the plot – reported by one baffled John Stone, a salesman. It was winter, thought Mr Stone, and the order was enough to cover five football pitches. “What do you want all that for?” he asked. “Are you planning a bomb attack?”

A week after their arrests, Mohammed Babar, an American al-Qaeda operative who trained with Khyam in Pakistan, was arrested in New York. The intelligence service compiled a huge list of friends, relatives and contacts, many with multiple identities"

Khyam had spoken with “enthusiasm and pleasure of the slaughter of nonbelievers”, the judge said. “You took full advantage of the benefits free society had to offer. You exploited the freedoms you sought to destroy with such evil purpose. You betrayed the country that’s given you every advantage in life".

Terrorism is always and only ever about ‘dodging a bullit’ – but public vigilance plays its part in operations, always has and always will.

UK institutional submission to Islam draws closer with the news that a magistrate faces legal prosecution after he walked out in protest after a women appeared wearing a Niqab in his court. Magistrate Ian Murray pulled out of the hearing when Zoobia Hussain appeared in a niqab, which covers the head and the face apart from the eyes.

Hussain, 32, believed to be a mother of five, appeared for what was due to be a brief administrative hearing this week before bench chairman Mr Murray and two colleagues at Manchester Magistrates Court. She denies causing £5,000 worth of criminal damage including graffiti to a housing association property from which she had been evicted. Her solicitor, Judith Hawkins, said Hussain wanted to appear in the dock in the niqab because she “observed the Muslim religion and remains covered in public places when men are present”.

Mr Murray then stunned those in court by saying he was withdrawing from the case because she was wearing a niqab, adding: “I do not feel I have to give any reasons. This is my personal view.”

Hussain, from the Crumpsall district of Manchester, told her solicitor his walkout was “scandalous”. She added: “There is a human being under here.”

Yes, I don’t doubt that, and one that stands indicted of serious criminal charges and who must be made to show her face and be stripped off the sickening mask of Islam. This country is not Islamic and should not tolerate this contrived effort by Islamic activists to advance the acceptance of the ROP.The magistrate should not have walked out however, had it been me I would have had Hussein thrown out, fined and forced to return dressed in a manner more appropriate for a British as opposed to a Pakistani Court.

For those of you who like a cigarette, enjoy your last day of freedom. At 6am tomorrow morning England becomes the last part of the United Kingdom to go ‘smoke free’ (an anodyne description for the abolition of a person’s liberty to enjoy a perfectly legal product in an enclosed public place). Scotland abolished nicotine-related social liberty in 2006; Wales and Northern Ireland followed in April of this year. Most businesses already display the ‘no smoking’ signs in abundance, in readiness for the impending draconian diktat.

I started to think where this lunacy began. Did it start back in 1992 with the death of British entertainer Roy Castle? Castle, who had never smoked in his life, died from lung cancer. It was said that years of appearances in smoke-filled clubs had precipitated the condition. I don’t suppose the media, increasingly reluctant to question anything outside of a narrow and narrowing PC remit, ever thought to list all the entertainers who have appeared in smoke-filled venues down the years and are still walking around very much alive. Oh well…..

I am not a smoker. However, I don’t think there would have been anything wrong with having enclosed, separate smoking areas in pubs, etc. I think it is highly distasteful to see people who smoke condemned to standing outside. It might not be so bad in summer (‘summer’? – now that’s funny!!), but why should they huddle outside in freezing cold December nights for the enjoyment of a cigarette, like naughty schoolchildren? They don’t have a compulsion for exposing themselves for goodness sake, they’re puffing on a cigarette. Yes, a cigarette!!! Those tiny sticks whose purchase provides much of the funding for the NHS and swells government coffers year-in and year-out, you hypocritical b******s!!!

You can rest assured that an army of inspecting, pen-pushing jobsworths will have already been employed to police this nonsense. Will it get to the stage where having a fag indoors brings a harsher penalty than burglary? You may laugh, but who’d have thought ten years ago that the police would take a car driver doing 3mph over the speed limit more seriously than another car driver who’d had his pride and joy vandalised to the tune of £500? The smoking ban is a quintessential example of this government’s approach to law and order: target the most law-abiding with stiff penalties and dictatorial edicts so that relatively minor transgressions can flood the crime-busting statistics. Meanwhile, spend less time dealing with serious offences, lest it offend some minority group, transgress someone’s ‘human rights’, or entail the completion of 600 pages of pointless paperwork.

I love this article in an online American publication. Rudy Giuliani has promised American Jews that, if elected to the White House (please God!) in 2008, he will tackle the scourge of Islamic terrorism. Rightly comparing this wave of Muslim nutcases to the Nazis, he also pledged that Iran would not be allowed to threaten the existence of Israel with nuclear weapons.

Can you ever comprehend such candour from any mainstream British politician or media outlet? Here they are too busy creeping around the Muzzas for fear of causing offence. In the days of the Provo terror campaign there was no such reticence. The IRA were/are classed as ‘terrorists’ for that’s exactly what they were/are. They had no mandate to do what they did; they always had a political alternative by which to argue the advance of their goals; they did not care if civilians were caught up in their carnage; they exercised power within their own communities through fear. They were/are, by every conceivable definition, ‘terrorists’.

So why not apply that magic description where our niqab-sporting underlings of Allah are concerned? Following yesterday’s attempted plot to blow hundreds of innocent Londoners to pieces through, not one but two, massive improvised car bombs, the BBC and ITV have been oh so careful to avoid the ‘T’ word. It could have been ‘Islamic extremists’; it could have been ‘Al Queda sympathisers’. Or, if you are the ultra-foul BBC (where having an Asian name is a dead cert to get you a prominent position within the news reading department), you don’t really have a clue as to who the hell it could have been.

It is a reasonable assumption to conclude that ISLAMIC TERRORISTSwere behind yesterday’s foiled exercise. If calling them terrorists offends the bedsheet-wearing brigade who walk around the streets of our cities determined never to integrate into our society then frankly, my dears, I don’t give a damn.

By the way, I have included a little film that shows what London went through during the blitz. I hope it gives our overseas readers some understanding as to why this country will never cower before these Islamic terrorists, just as we never cowered before the IRA or the Luftwaffe.

St Thomas More left us many great things, not least of which his witticism on being taken up to be executed: "See me safe up: for my coming down, I can shift for myself". But a comment on my post of an Al-Jihadi TV mockery got me thinking of another quotation of St. Thomas More:

"The devil…the prowde spirite…cannot endure to be mocked."

I think that whatever we think about the ‘religion’ of Islam, we can all agree that the idea of bombing and mutilating, capturing and murdering civilians, is purely diabolic. That is to say, of the devil. This is proven again, in line with St. Thomas More’s observation, when we consider moslem rage. That is, Pope Rage, Cartoon Rage, Rushdie Rage, etc, etc, ad nauseam. It begins to seem that not only do the ‘jihadist scum’ (to happily quote the commenter) want to intimidate us into submission, but that they’re winning! As long as we fear ‘offending’ them, as long as we fail to mock that which should rightly be mocked, that diabolic spirit, we’re not doing what we ought against them. The commenter says that making fun of them in the light of today’s almost-event is ‘not funny’. I disagree.

Make no mistake, these maniacs want you and yours dead or under dhimmi submission, and they and their ilk will not cease in that until forcibly stopped. Well, the government may or may not one day wake up to the threat and do something useful against it. But for us, the everyday people, our choice is somewhat simpler. Do we want to live and die doing what we like, living as humans, or do we want to spend the rest of our lives trembling and jumping at shadows because of some cowardly murderers following what some have so eloquently described as ‘the Cult of the Dead Paedophile’? Hang it all, even if they do get us, it’s only death, when all’s said and done. Did you really think you were going to live forever? You’ll live, you’ll die, why not make the bit in between count, and worry a little less about how far you can stretch it?

Today, hundreds are alive who would have been dead if the cowardly and utterly contemptible plan to murder innocent civilians had gone off without a hitch. Tomorrow, well, that’s another day. But for now, we’re alive, and why shouldn’t we rejoice in that? And if we can have a little fun at the expense of those scum who would have robbed us of that, whyever not? Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to watch the car advert my colleague posted for the fifth time. Just can’t get enough of that wonderful bluff.

You do not defeat terrorism by rewarding terrorists, regardless of how many bleeding heart liberals argue otherwise. Want to know where that flawed approach leads to? Read UNIONISM DECAYED 1997-2007 - It's my first book and it explains what happens when you seeek to appease terrorists and call it peace. It's available right now for ATW readers so make sure you get your copy by emailing the editor! This is the book that dissents from the herd mentality that doing wrong can lead to being right. It doesn't and this book spells out WHY.

Copyright & copy; 2010 A Tangled Web (All rights reserved).Comments on articles here are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of A Tangled Web or David Vance. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise unacceptable may be deleted by the Editor. However the fact a particular comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by David Vance of the views expressed therein.