A GREAT DISCOVERY is universally acclaimed by this name at the moment of its
birth. It is as an infant whose parents and their friends vociferously herald
its advent and prophesy its greatness.

The public is ever anxious to welcome any innovation when it has within it the
infinite possibilities of the unknown coupled with the marvelous.

Generally some element of truth is present as an excuse for its existence.
Whether sufficient of this be present or not only time and the future can
determine.

It must run its circle to test its verity during the labor of proof.

If it were not greeted with enthusiasm it would hardly be given a trial. This
very enthusiasm at its birth is the momentum that carries it to the completion
of the circle and finally determines its status and its truth.

As De Bruyire said, "The last thing we learn about anything is where to begin."

From notes, researches, and experiments made since 1889 facts have been
elucidated, which will at first excite wonder, and which must then certainly
stimulate deeper and more thorough investigation in the bacteriological field.

With more than twenty years of experiment and study in general practice and in
the laboratory, the author has satisfied himself of facts, which may seem
astounding to the present workers in the bacteriological field. That they will
come to his way of thinking after investigating and experimenting along the
lines on which he has been working admit of no argument.

He has not made known his discoveries up to the present time for fear that a
halfproven theory would only bring ridicule from the profession, but now that he
has proved to himself without a doubt that he is absolutely correct, and beyond
a point where his discoveries can be disproved, he is ready and here gives his
findings to the scientific world.

Progress in medicine, as in all branches of the arts, is advanced more by the
blunders made and corrected than by original discoveries.

Evolution progresses in circles, and in its journey if errors are observed and
corrected, and the original theory constantly improved, by the time that it
arrives at its starting point, it is found to be on a higher plane. If its plane
is not elevated during its circuitous route it becomes obsolete.

To take stock of and to summarize all the accepted facts of today, will show
that with all the study and work expended in the bacteriological field it has
not been raised to the elevated plane that it should reach, owing to the fact
that scientists have often accepted too much as their fundamental principles
upon which to base their experiments, involving errors from the beginning that
up to the present time have not been corrected.

THE greatest mistake ever made, and what X was
actually universally accepted by the medical world as a truth, turns out to be
an error, the enormity of which can never be equalled nor half appreciated. The
damage it has wrought in the human family will be readily seen, and the
correction should be made without delay, for every hour places a black mark
against those who are the keepers of the people's health.

Let us hold an autopsy on this error, which will show itself to be an ignorant
procedure and an obsolete practice. Then let us bury the mistake which is a
privilege allowed the medical profession.

This error was handed to us by Dr. Jenner when he discovered a prophylactic for
smallpox. There never was, nor is there now, a doubt that the inoculation of
cowpox into the human blood is a prophylactic against smallpox. Why? We do not
know. Is that a scientific procedure? Has the germ of cowpox, or vaccina, as it
is called, been discovered? Hasthe germ of smallpox
been discovered? No. Then we are still on the level of knowledge, in this
particular, with the savage and his herb. Tradition is his teacher. He
accomplishes what he sets out to do the reason why is unnecessary.

From writings we can only form a poor estimate of what a scourge and pestilence
the dreaded disease of smallpox was, and today we can safely say that, due to
the inoculation of the human family with cowpox, passing through five
generations, smallpox is practically extinct.

This was truly a blessing in disguise, for, while it prevented smallpox, it
scattered broadcast other diseases or sequelae which are today a dread to all,
as were the periodical epidemics of smallpox in the beginning.

Vaccina is a widely different type of disease from smallpox, the latter being an
acute, selflimiting, eruptive, contagious fever. It was discovered that while
the blood was poisoned with one disease it was immune against the contagion of
another, when the etiology of neither was known.

THE father of the "Great Discovery" of vaccination observed that many persons
who lived on the western coast of England were immune to smallpox, and when
epidemicsinfested those localities certain persons
among the working-class, although exposed, were exempt from the disease.

That was the district of the dairy industry. A disease was discovered among the
cows that manifested itself as a sore on the udders of the cow and was
circulated and reinfected among the animals through the medium of the milkers'
hands.

This disease developed on the hands of the milkers and in many cases spread from
their hands to their mouths or to other parts of their bodies where their
uncleansed hands might infect. This was a cow's disease, pure and simple. Pure,
because it was found on the part of the cow from which the innocent milk came,
and the inference was that it was harmless as milk. No one died from this
infection, and the immediate manifestation
disappeared, leaving no visible injury.

What did develop later in these persons was never connected with the primary
inoculation. Ailments that these persons might suffer from later, found in other
parts of the body, could not with any common-sense reasoning be traced back to
the milkers' sores. Those who milked cows in this part
of the country lived in the open and were a sturdy, healthy class of people. The
real battles their phagocytes fought were never recorded.

While we are lauding the health of these young men and women and how lightly
this serious infection was regarded by them, we must trace the cause a little
farther back and not charge all this unknown result to the innocent fountain of
milk.

We must take note that, besides the dairy industry in the country around the
Bristol Channel, this part of the country was the center for shipping of the
world and that sailors and adventurers were dumped on this soil after long
voyages that took these men into many ports, landing them here full of
adventures of all kinds, experience, and also syphilis.

Hygiene was unknown, and dirty hands and other things were not given much, if
any, attention. Here is where syphilis was spread. The dairy maid did not tell
her secrets, but with all her troubles spit on her
unclean hands and went to milking. Is there any wonder that the cows' udders
were infected and that innocent milkers were infected through abrasions on their
hands, etc.?

Is it not a fact without the possibility of a doubt that vaccina or cowpox is
syphilis inoculated into the cow through human infection?

Dr. Jenner took this bovine syphilis and vaccinated the healthy baby and all who
wished to be fortified against the possible contagion of smallpox.

After twenty- two years of observation and investigation the author states that
no uncured syphilitic can contract smallpox, and we all know that those
inoculated with bovine syphilis are to a lesser degree immune.

With this modified form of syphilis in their blood and tissues smallpox would,
if it should develop, appear in a strikingly milder form.

When a person contracts syphilis in the recognized way, with the memories of
terrible tales told of this most loathsome disease, together with a guilty
conscience, is it a wonder that fear besets them?

In this nervous condition and with possibly lowered vitality from often repeated
debauches the victim secures the services of a doctor. The wise doctor knows
that mercury is the specific remedy that will kill the cause, so the patient is
forthwith mercurialized.

The patient is between two fires, and we will leave it to the therapeutist to
determine which fire is signaling to him in later years.

We forget to fortify nature's weapons and to use our mercury physiologically,
reserving it as a remedy to keep the blood constituents in normal proportion.
Blood-counts are the mile-posts for the exhibition of mercury.

These facts are only mentioned to call your attention to what nature's own
method of cure can accomplish and why those who are vaccinated with cowpox,
while in perfect health, are delighted with the initial lesion that develops on
their arm. They are told with all assurance that it has taken and that they are
safe.

No treatment is ever instituted after vaccination to purify the blood, which is
just as reasonable after one initial lesion as the other.

Nature combats all diseases, and it is only when it falls short that the doctor
pieces it out with his remedies.

This tragedy of vaccination makes Shakespeare's "Hamlet" a tame tale.

For 125 years the human race has inoculated itself and babes in arms with
syphilis, thank God for the modification, but syphilis just the same. This
poison it has never tried to cure or eradicate from the system, and for fear
that the strength might leave the tissues, revaccination is again resorted to.

The skeptical and the dutiful followers of science who do not think or
experiment for themselves, but store away in their brains as facts and truth
whatever they happen to hear, may doubt these statements and will want to have
proofs that this harmless vaccination (?) has any sequelae.

In closing this story, which is truly a tragedy, the author will devote a
chapter later to prove that sequelae follow vaccina.

In doing this, a picture of the bacteriological errors will be presented for
inspection. With errors corrected and missing links supplied the chain will be
complete, and a correct classification of diseases will be made, which at
present are scattered around in the fog of mystery and ignorance.

Many investigators in this department of medicine have taken up the work where
their predecessors ceased and, while in error, wonder why they cannot make
greater haste in their obscured mysterious field.

NOTES taken from cases beginning 1889. The summary of the findings from these
notes here follows:

Every reader, if he doubts, will have a starting point for investigation for
himself.

Question I. Why will a person who has syphilis (uncured) not contract smallpox?

Question II. Why will a person who has had syphilis not "take," as it is called,
when vaccinated with vaccina or cowpox?

Question III. Why will a person recently vaccinated not contract the initial
lesion of syphilis when liberally exposed, not previously even having had a
venereal disease?

History of a case: Two men kept company with a woman who afterward was found to
have contracted syphilis from an outside source. One of these men did not
contract the disease, but the other did, both repeatedly exposing themselves to
the infection, up to the time the secondary showed on the woman. Both men were
veterans of the Spanish War and were thoroughly vaccinated. The one who got the
initial lesion suffered from a chancre in an exceedingly mild form, which
disappeared in 20 days without any treatment, and under constant observation for
2 years no secondary symptom ever developed. This was in 1899.

The woman took treatment for 7 months after the secondary symptoms showed
themselves. She died of cancer of the uterus in 1910. Both men, who were
perfectly healthy in 1899, were suffering from tuberculosis in 1912.

Question IV. Why, if one half of the children of a
family be vaccinated with vaccina, will only those who were vaccinated develop
diphtheria when an epidemic of tonsillitis attacks the family?

History of a case: The author will relate this case, the one that started him in
his investigation and study on this subject. June 15th, 1889, the author was
spending his vacation on the ranch of a wealthy farmer in the northern part of
the state of California, fifteen miles from the nearest town, a farm of 10,000
acres and no immediate neighbors. The farmer had a wife and seven children. The
foreman, a negro, had a wife and five children. None had ever been vaccinated.
Six of them were selected and vaccinated by the author:

The farmer's wife, age 43 years.
The farmer's daughter, age 6 years.
The farmer's son, age 8 years.
The farmer's son, age 25 years.
The negro foreman, age 46 years.
His son, age 1 2 years.

All the rest were left out and were not afterward vaccinated.

August 1st, 1890, the farmer, his wife, and five children went to the mountain
ranch forty miles away, taking with them the foreman, his wife, and five
children. There had been no diphtheria in the town nor any in their neighborhood.
The mountain ranch was an uninhabited virgin pine forest district with pure
water, where they took up their camp.

August 24th an epidemic of sore throat and canker sores developed among the
children.

Farmer's daughter, seven years old, son, nine years old, and foreman's son,
thirteen years old, developed very serious throat and constitutional symptoms
and were taken to the home ranch, from where a doctor was sent for. Diphtheria
was the diagnosis. The farmer's wife also developed diphtheria. All the rest who
had not been vaccinated cured rapidly of their sore throats. The farmer's
daughter, seven years old, died. The farmer's son, nine years old, did not
recuperate for one year. The farmer's wife, 44 years old, had paralysis and
sequelae which lasted over one year. The foreman's son, thirteen years old,
became very weak and did not return to normal health.

The treatment used by the doctor who was in constant attendance was: Tr. Ferri
Chloride, Insufflations of Sulphur and Calomel; afterward Syr. Ferri lodidi and
Kali lodidi.

In 1893, the farmer's son, 29 years old, died in Los Angeles, Cal., of
tubercular intestinal trouble; in 1900, the foreman, at 57 years of age, died of
tubercle or cancer of larynx; in 1902, the foreman's son, 25 years old, died of
tuberculosis; in 1909, the farmer's wife, 63 years old, died of cancer ; in
1911, the farmer's son, 30 years old, died of tubercular meningitis.

The farmer died of old age. All the rest are living and in perfect health, nor
have they ever been vaccinated. No tuberculosis has shown in any of those
living, nor is there any family history of tuberculosis. All who were vaccinated
in 1889 are now dead.

Mrs. A. of Mendocino County had 1 2 children. In 1888 was in Ukiah with her
children. Had six of the younger ones vaccinated. In 1889 her whole family
developed sore throats. The six who were vaccinated all died within one week of
diphtheria.

After sufficient observations, the author when called to a case of sore throat,
tonsillitis, pharyngitis, laryngitis, croup, or quinsy, made it a rule to ask if
the patient had been vaccinated and examined the scar. The rule that he adopted
in his practice was "diphtheria cannot be diagnosed or found in the patient who
has not been previously vaccinated."

Question V. Why will the Wassermann and Noguchi tests show positive in persons
recently vaccinated who have never contracted syphilis nor inherited it?

Question VIII. Why is leprosy a plague in the Hawaiian Islands, which has
developed so since sailors imported syphilis there?

With climatic conditions and virgin healthy susceptible tissues, soon the entire
country was inoculated. Syphilitic parents on both sides propagated children
with inherited syphilis. Leprosy has been called syphilis in its fourth stage.
Dr. Fitch claimed that this was the case and that in this tissue, with climatic
influence, the disease of syphilis ran a more rapid and varying course with a
fourth stage: Leprosy.

History of a case: In 1890, father, mother, and two children were all
vaccinated. No previous vaccination nor history of syphilis acquired; inherited
no tuberculosis. Mother miscarried two months later. The next child, born
fourteen months later, was markedly scrofulous, and the child born two years
after this was also scrofulous. The first two children of this family are still
alive, and the last two have died of tuberculosis.

The mother developed cancer two years ago and died. The father, who is alive,
developed psoriasis. Three intravenous injections of salvarsan caused marked
improvement, when all previous treatment had no effect.

The author will now take up the bacteriological part of this subject. When first
brought to the investigator's notice, it will cause doubt, wonder, then
investigation, and lastly the truth, universally accepted, which the author
prays will not be further delayed.

IN the Dark Ages of Medicine, when Dr. Jenner showed a candle light for the
moths of science to singe their wings, it was discovered that the inoculation of
one disease produced the immunity against the infection of another disease
widely and pathologically different. The etiology of neither being known,
syphilis, a chronic blood disease remaining through the entire life of the
patient, appearing in four separate stages, and manifesting itself
pathologically in an endless number of ways in every imaginable form that a
deviation of healthy tissue can show itself, is inoculated in its modified form,
vaccina, into the human family to prevent the possible contagion of an acute,
self-limiting fever. This fever is highly contagious, while the disease
inoculated is only infectious, not contagious, and only
transmitted through a scratch or abrasion directly producing a culture in the
blood of the patient.

Why should the presence of one disease fortify the blood against another widely
different in every respect one an incurable or uncured chronic inheritable
malady with the largest assortment of sequelae, the other a self-limiting fever
without a single sequela? Why? Neither Jenner, nor anyone else today, can answer
this freak truth in nature.

The author will state some facts, of which he has already satisfied himself, and
he asks you to start at the beginning and disprove his assertions if your
investigations and experiments can do so. To make any headway in bacteriological
science one must throw out the errors that have been nursed into what looks like
a fully accepted theory, for whatever way one tries to utilize the false theory,
it will not work out with any scientific correctness.

The specific form of contagion of smallpox has never been discovered. For the
present we will drop this disease from our consideration, as it has nothing to
do with, or is it in the class with, those that follow.

The specific bacteria of syphilis is still missing and also the bacteria of
vaccina or cowpox. The specific bacteria, the cause of the following so-called
diseases, still remain undiscovered:

Scrofula Diphtheria
Tuberculosis Leprosy
Cancer

Only those are mentioned that have direct relation to the subject.

Syphilis, vaccina, diphtheria, tuberculosis, and leprosy, all have a bacillus
that is given the credit of being the cause. The true specific germ that is the
cause of these conditions, including cancer, still remains undiscovered.

When this disease, syphilis, is subdivided into its stages, sequelae, and varied
manifestations, it will be left to the bacteriologists to discover the real
culprit, to which there is a substantial clue.

The specific bacteria that cause the diseases, which up to the present time are
not discovered, will be found when bacteriological technic is improved and the
magnifying powerof microscopes is increased, so that
germs that cannot now be seen will be plainly discerned and classified.

The makers of microscopes have been satisfied with supplying the demand. The
inventors in this mechanical department have shown themselves to be exceedingly
unprogressive. The word "CAN'T," which is not in the vocabulary of mechanical
nomenclature in the present era, is hewed out in letters of stone and hung
around the necks of microscopical manufacturers.

Who will be the inventor of an improved modern microscope wherein the proper
ratio of multiplication of light power will be produced to sustain increased
magnifying power; with motion photographs taken, which will be again enlarged in
throwing them upon a screen, until we shall be able to see motion photograph
plays with bacteria, at present undiscovered, which will play the principal
roles in the dramas produced when the bacteria X. Y. Z. will be in the A. B. C.
class with the bacteriologist. Sections will then be made of the bacilli, and
the specific bacteria that they carry and propagate within their bodies will be
individually studied and properly classified.

What is a bacillus? A rod-shaped organism found only where there is dead tissue
and decomposition. To claim that a bacillus is the cause of a disease, that it
is the specific bacteria producing a special disease, is preposterous. Bacilli
can be grown in cultures, and if taken from a particular disease, will at the
same time that they are propagated breed the particular undiscovered bacteria,
with which their bodies are infected and which is the true cause of the disease;
and this is why, if these cultures are inoculated, the original disease will be
reproduced in healthy tissue. Bacilli are found everywhere in every kind of dead
and decomposed organic matter.

The diseases that are claimed up to the present time to be produced by a
bacillus are only the pathological conditions that develop dead tissue and that
cannot be absorbed or eliminated, with the result of decomposition and the
presence of bacilli. The true bacteria undiscovered, this microscopical maggot
was naturally accepted as the cause.

Bacilli are only found in the manifestations of a disease, and if they appear to
cause a condition it is only that their bodies are infected with the true
bacteria. The reason why great, new discoveries are periodically heralded and
tried for the cure of these diseases, of which the bacillus is given as a cause,
and with the same results of nothing accomplished, is because a cure or
preventive is sadly needed. This all proves that the true cause of the disease
has not been found, and until it is, guessing and trying every foolish
conceivable thing will go on. Turtles, lizards, and snakes will get into our
pharmacopea, and we may soon find ourselves in the same dark pit of medical
superstition into which Chinese medicine has fallen.

Not to wander too far from the original subject and reach out into wilds as
unexplored as the special subject we are discussing, we will limit ourselves to
that pathological branch of which syphilis is the parent. When the head waters
are found, it will be easy drifting down the stream, picking up the true
classification and treatment. "Exact knowledge of the truth," is the boat we can
all be carried in. It can safely be accepted that where we have a bacillus that
is thought to be the specific bacterium of a disease, we can be sure that the
true bacterium has not been found. A list of bacilli found will here be given so
that you can see that the author is correct in his assertion that bacilli are
only products found in decayed organic matter. Spirillum belongs to this class.
(See Appendix for list of Bacilli and Spirilli.)

Are they not the flies and maggots of bacteriology and no more the cause of a
disease than is a fly? They undoubtedly carry the true causative germ on and in
their bodies, and are really the scavengers of diseased tissue.

Taking up separately the conditions that descend from the parent cause, we see
now how the microscopist has up to the present time, unnoticed and unknowingly,
really classified this disease, compelled by the bacilli found, into the group
of diseases and sequelae, as follows :

SYPHILIS.

Lustgarten's Bacillus of Syphilis: Similar in all respects with the Tubercular
Bacillus, discovered in 1884.

Van Niessen's Bacillus of Syphilis: Resembled in every way the Klebs-Loeffler

Bacillus of Diphtheria and vaccina, discovered in 1899.

VACCINA.

Klein in 1892 discovered a bacillus for vaccina, and in 1899 Van Niessen
discovered his bacillus of syphilis, which was identical.

DIPHTHERIA.

Klebs and Loeffler discovered the bacillus of diphtheria; in 1899 Van Niessen
discovered that the Klebs-Loeffler bacillus was identical with his bacillus of
syphilis and Klein's bacillus of vaccina.

TUBERCULOSIS.

Koch in 1882 discovered the bacillus of tuberculosis. It was found to resemble
Hansen's bacillus of leprosy, discovered by Hansen in 1871; it resembled the
Klebs-Loeffler bacillus of diphtheria, and also was similar to Lustgarten's
bacillus of syphilis.

LEPROSY.

Hansen in 1871 discovered a bacillus of leprosy, and when Koch discovered the
tubercular bacillus, it was found to be similar.

CANCER.

No one claims a bacillus for cancer in any of its forms, but just the same the
true germ, not a bacillus, is present, as in all of the stages of this
pathological disorder. The reason why a bacillus has not been found in this
malady is because this stage takes on a different form than death and decay of
tissue, as it shows itself in increased circulation and growth and rapid
proliferation of cells. This is another strong proof against the theory that
bacilli are the cause of any diseased condition.

The true germ is present, but the bacillus cannot live in this manifestation. If
we had the protecting work of the scavenger, "The Bacillus," here, results might
not be so malignant. Bacilli encompass the true bacteria when found in the
pathological manifestation. Therefore cultures of the bacilli do produce
unobserved cultures of the specific bacteria, and hence antitoxin serums and
vaccine bacterins possess the specific power that is claimed for them, and hence
any successful results.

Antitoxin of diphtheria, typhoid vaccine, bacterins, etc., which possess
positive wonderful results, are all examples of the above statement.

The culture of bacilli is unsatisfactory in many cases, due to their being
deprived of their true source of nourishment, which is rotten, decomposed
matter. It is only when the culture medium becomes decomposed that one can with
any degree of success produce a culture.

The bacilli are all practically in the same class with the varying changes of
shape and habit as we expect to find in any biological species.

The different methods required to cultivate different colonies, the varying
colors, and afterward the separate staining processes necessary, are all due to
the different bacteria that they are mixed with, taking on changed properties
and idiosyncrasies in accordance with the special diseased germ which they have
in and around their bodies.

Do we examine the great circulating fluids of the body and find bacilli, when we
know that the body is infected with a disease and the specific bacteria are
positively traveling through the circulation and are in all the living tissues?
No. We look for and find the misleading bacillus only in the broken-down dead
tissue, which is the pathological manifestation of a disease of that class.

Enough has been said to satisfy the best informed, who will require little time
to prove to themselves that the author's statements are true.

THESE bacteria X. Y. Z. are very small, and widely different from other
disease-producing germs. They have not been recognized, due to their size and
different properties, and due also to other reasons, later to be described.

For the present the author gives this bacterium the name Bacterium X. Y. Z.

This germ is the cause of the following diseases :

Syphilis

X

Vaccina or Cowpox

Diphtheria

Tuberculosis

Y

Scrofula

Tertiary SyphiliticManifestation

Leprosy

Z

Cancer

This same bacterium in X. Y. and Z. and perhaps in many more stages of
development takes on specific producing power of like producing like in the
evolutionary stage in which the germ is found and reinoculated. This same germ
produces diphtheria when taken from diphtheria product, or tuberculosis if taken
from tuberculosis manifestations, etc.

If the cause or specific bacterium is the same in all the above-named
pathological demonstrations, then these names are only given to stages and
sequelae of the one primal disease, SYPHILIS. The advent of the disease appears
on the body at the point of infection, and is accepted as the initial lesion or
chancre appearing after the specific germ has saturated the body fluids. It is
the sore in vaccina and is the same slightly modified in vaccination. The other
steps follow according to the condition, idiosyncrasies, and combative power of
the protective forces of each individual and the effectiveness of treatment if
administered.

Considering each stage separately the author will endeavor to convince you to
his way of thinking that the one disease shows itself in various phases caused
by this specific germ. Accepting that this bacterium in growing older and
maturing passes through various phases and changes in its existence, as we see
in animal life everywhere as the tadpole changes to the frog, the caterpillar to
the butterfly, the egg and its evolution, the infant and man all passing through
various stages and phases, so also the bacteria X. Y. Z. produce upon
inoculation the manifestations according to the stage they happen to be in at
the time of infection.

We do know that its strongest characteristic is its infectiousness in its
earliest age, selecting its life dwelling place. Transplanting into healthy
tissue occurs in all its stages, but not so common or with the degree of ease as
in its earlier age.

If the chancre of humans is inoculated from human to human we expect to see
secondary symptoms following shortly. If modified, as in inoculation of cow
syphilis, this rule is a little changed, secondary following immediately,
markedly milder or masked. The next symptoms are demonstrated in the throat if
the germ is ripe and virulent in the economy and the throat is in an abnormal
condition at this time with pharyngitis and stomach disorders or tonsillitis and
if the field is prepared for pathological demonstration then diphtheria is
manifested.

As children have not been exposed to infection from human syphilis, the germ is
inoculated through vaccination of cow syphilis. Taking in a modified form it is
nevertheless the original germ, which when put into the child's blood remains
there for life with no effort ever made to treat the little victim with mercury
and other antisyphilitic remedies.

The antitoxin comes in now as the accepted specific remedy for treatment, which
is the true antitoxin of bacteria X., and which is propagated along with their
carriers, the bacilli Klebs-Loeffler,
and in this misunderstood, rough way the good work has been achieved, previous
to the discovery of the true bacteria.

Patients with diphtheria who survive after a thorough treatment with
.diphtheria antitoxin are also very probably cured of modified syphilis with
which the blood was infected.

The next manifestation we have of syphilis or cow syphilis is tuberculosis.
Since vaccination of vaccina, this germ has been sown and inoculated broadcast,
so compelled by cruel, ignorant laws, and the cure will never be achieved so
long as the cause is present.

We have the tertiary forms of syphilis following more from direct human
inoculation than from the bovine modification then the inherited forms where one
and where both parents are affected, coming before us in the form of scrofula
and leprosy.

Since carcinoma and sarcoma are included in this classification, mention of them
must be made here, but until bacteria X. Y. Z. are actually placed in the A. B.
C. role, we will not be able to definitely describe these forms.

These tumors take on a different aspect. They are growing bodies with rapid cell
proliferation, increased blood supply, becoming heterogeneous, and abnormal
exuberant growths, when open suppurating and throwing their live cells off so
rapidly that there is no opportunity for proper decomposition, so as to harbor a
bacillus as a supposed cause. So, even with the multitude of bacilli, not one of
them can adopt the cancer; however, the bacteria Z. is there.

While the bacillus has been looked upon as the cause and enemy in these
pathological manifestations, we may find that this bacillus after all, is the
true friend, and an adjunct to nature placed there to hold the true pathogenic
germ under subjection. Imprisoned in their bodies until thrown off by the
economy with the dead tissue and suppuration, they take up the work where the
phagocytes fall short.

The non-pathogenic bacilli, as the prodigiosus and lacto-bacillus, we know, when
thrown into the body alive, accomplish wonderful results in a cure because of
their strong property of devouring true disease germs. So when we find bacilli
in a manifestation of a disease associated with them, we are sure to find the
true cause.

We therefore must surely have in the pure cultures of non-pathogenic bacilli a
curative agent, which the author will give later on when he has completed his
experiments along that line.

Non-pathogenic bacilli will be thrown into the circulation at the height of
diseases, such as scarlatina, measles, smallpox and other cases of acute,
self-limiting, contagious fevers where we cannot definitely find a germ. They
will take up the true germ, after which the bacillus can be recaptured. Then
cultures will be made from these, making it possible to make the vaccine
bacterins, antitoxin, etc., for these diseases, which has been thought
impossible up to now, for the specific bacteria could not be found to work with.
We will then have a scientific and mathematically correct immunizing agent and
cure.

IN 1892 a commission was named by Great Britain to ascertain what vaccina was.
The investigation was taken up by the prominent bacteriologists, and it was then
that Klein discovered his bacillus of vaccina. Still no germ for smallpox, nor
has it been found up to the present time. The British Commission endeavored to
find the relation of vaccina to smallpox, and the more they worked the farther
apart the two different pathological disorders drifted, until it was decided
that they were in no way similar nor in the same class.

Dr. W. J. Simpson at that time settled the erroneous theory that vaccina was
smallpox in the cow. He found that smallpox positively was not vaccina or
cowpox.

He inoculated cows with smallpox and carried it through four generations of the
cow, and when this was revaccinated into the human blood it produced smallpox.
These findings were final, and vaccina was accepted as a separate disease with
very little known about it, with the Klein bacillus to lend a scientific dignity
to it. If the anti-vaccination advocates had known the facts set forth in this
article, it would have been a discarded practice long ago.

They knew something was wrong, but they did not know what it was. The reason why
anti-vaccination has always failed is because its
advocates did not have a single fact of the truth to back up their arguments.
They wished to take away something tangible, this great safeguard to public
health, as it has unfortunately been looked upon, without offering a substitute
or improvement to take its place.

The author supplies the substitute. The old poisoned arrow is to be thrown away
and the new automatic weapon will be found accurate to place in the gap and
guard public health against the foe, smallpox, without injury to the man behind
the gun.

We know what antitoxins are and how to immunize the blood with the disease
itself without infecting with the disease. So we must simply immunize the human
subject with the antitoxin of smallpox itself, and that is the whole story. The
fear of spreading the disease from the laboratories is the reason that this has
never been tried.

Vaccine bacterins is another method of immunizing and has not been attempted
because the germ of smallpox was not in evidence and no cultures could be made
of an unknown germ.

This is easily done, now that the author has demonstrated what bacilli are; for
we simply make a bacillus of smallpox by mixing the blood of the smallpox
patient at the height of a fever with a non-pathogenic bacillus (Bacillus
prodigiosus). This bacillus goes in and performs its duty and soon is filled
with the smallpox germ and becomes the artificially made bacillus of smallpox.
Cultures of these will grow, and our vaccine bacterins of smallpox will be put
on the market.

Immunizing against smallpox will be done as immunizing against typhoid fever is
now being successfully practiced, although the typhoid germ is still not found,
but the bacillus typhoid is really artificially made in the intestines of the
patient with that disease.

The manufacturers of antitoxins and vaccine bacterins should not be expected to
make this product for fear of spreading smallpox. The author asked them to do it
some years ago, and he got a refusal. He had to carry on these experiments in
his laboratory under great difficulties. He succeeded in producing an antitoxine
which he called "Smallpox Immunizing Serum."

The government will handle this product, finding many volunteers among the best
scientific men necessary to carry on the work, who will place in the hands of
the public a sterile, non-infecting package, which will be harmless but more
strongly preventive than the cruel, horrible practice that has accomplished
nothing, when put in the balance with the suffering it has wrought.

While we have under consideration the artificially produced antitoxin and the
harnessing of our friend, the bacillus, the author will make mention of the
possible cure for tuberculosis, accepting the theory of the true mission of the
bacillus, that it is a product and curative agent and not a cause; and that is
to cause the live bacillus laden with bacteria Y. to be thrown in large
quantities into the blood of a cold-blooded animal, one whose blood will not
propagate the true bacteria Y. of the tubercular stage and at the same time will
not kill the bacillus, its carrier.

An idea might be mentioned here that pulmonary tuberculosis patients, who reduce
the proportion of heat and moisture inhaled, do improve. The continued outdoor
life through a frigid winter shows that cold is not conducive to the bacteria Y.
in this stage and if that infinitesimal exhibition of cold will accomplish such
visible destruction of this, what will happen in the cold-blooded animal, the
turtle, which is long lived with strong resistance, slow circulation, and living
comfortably in ice water? The demonstration will be many times multiplied.

The bacillus in its temporary abode loses its pathogenicity, and when this live
bacillus is again injected into a tubercular patient like a vacuum, it hungrily
and rapidly devours the meal, bacteria Y., which is its regular diet. Enough of
these starved live bacilli thrown into the blood of a tubercular patient, at
regular intervals, may soon cleanse the tissue and fluids of the true germ of
the tuberculosis stage. The author is endeavoring to produce a culture which he
calls "Anti Tubercular Vaccine."

That conclusive proofs have been produced and the facts of the unquestionable
truth demonstrated. He places his findings on the altar of science.

Who can deny his assertions and the evidence submitted, evidence which was
actually made and which has herein been submitted, in the great discoveries of
the greatest authorities of bacteriological study, covering the past thirty-four
years?

This evidence in this case of the greatest crime known to the world is
sufficient to seal the death warrant of, execute, and bury the old criminal
"VACCINATION OF COWPOX."

If there is left a small minority of adherents to this old habit they will have
to be considered as accomplices hereafter. A guilty conscience and condemnation
to the bottomless pit of ignorance is the punishment they will receive from the
true scientists and the unfortunate laymen men who will stand out with the
strength of public opinion and legislation, if need be, to protect their little
children and the future unborn, to whom we owe our greatest duty. They must be
left a legacy of health, good government, and the means to live and enjoy their
short stay. As path finders and pioneers of this world, we must show them the
road leading to the truth.

SPIRILLUMBuccale Found in tartar of teeth
Cholerae Asiaticae. P. The comma-bacillus from stools of patients with epidemic
cholera
Of Finckler Prior. From cholera stools
Milleri P. From rotten teeth
Obermeieri Bacillus of relapsing fever
Sputigenum Found in saliva
Tyrogenum Found in cheese resembling cholera spirillum

A complete list of Bacilli can not be submitted as Bacteriologists are daily
increasing the number. Wherever decomposed matter is found, a bacillus can be
discovered.

They vary in appearance according to the conditions surrounding, the varying
elements of the matter, etc., all of which cause difference in size,
disposition, qualities and properties.

The Spirochoeta pallida is not considered by the Author as the cause of Syphilis
Anaemia, with an undetermined Bacteria present in the blood, is the cause of its
presence. It is one of nature's assistants and its office is similar to all
Bacilli or Sperrillae.

In Relapsing fever and other diseases where blood properties are deficient the
Spirochoeta is found.

Questions will be answered and Proofs furnished by the Author to those who will
address their communications to him.