Unlike Mexico, Canada Is Mere Bystander In White House Race

HOLTVILLE, Calif. — In this election year, in this place, in the rare event someone mentions Canada it's liable to be as a joke.

John Hernandez offers an example of the genre.

He greets a visitor to the southern tip of California and, upon learning he's Canadian, Hernandez cracks a quip about the border — not the one nearby that everyone's talking about in the presidential election, but the other one, way up north.

"You gonna build a wall there too?" the retired state employee says upon encountering a Canadian reporter outside a cemetery in Holtville, Calif., a few kilometres from Mexico.

"No? Canada's not gonna have to build a wall and pay for it yourselves?"

He's being sarcastic.

He knows the answer to both questions is no. Like many here, he's noticed that only one of America's neighbours has become an issue in this election — and it's not the one closest to the North Pole.

"People know the disparity," he said. "Mexicans are treated differently."

Trump didn't mention Canada once in immigration speech

This tale of two disparately discussed neighbours has experienced its dramatic climax with Donald Trump flying into Mexico City on a public-relations mission Wednesday, followed by an evening speech where he doubled-down on his hardline approach of deporting millions, building a wall, and forcing Mexico to pay for it.

Trump delivered a one hour, 15-minute speech about border security without mentioning Canada.

It's the story of the campaign. Even when he raises an issue that seriously affects Canada, the northern neighbour's an incidental bystander. Like his threat to cancel a trade deal in the country that buys 76 per cent of Canada's exports.

In a major trade speech where he announced a renegotiation-or-cancellation policy on NAFTA, Trump referred to Mexican factories taking jobs; his campaign issued a statement railing against Mexico's allegedly unfair trade practices. But the northern amigo? Not a word about it — negative or otherwise.

Some Republicans favour Canada-U.S. trade

The dynamic played out at the Republican convention. The opening night's speeches featured anecdotes about Americans being killed by illegal immigrants from the south. In hallway interviews, delegates gushed about the northern neighbour.

They confessed they hadn't thought about it much during the election. Of the half-dozen or so people interviewed there, none were even aware the U.S. had a trade deal with Canada that predated NAFTA.

All agreed with bringing back the old Canada-U.S. accord if NAFTA got spiked.

A Texas convention-goer's eyebrows scrunched in surprise when a reporter asked about trade with Canada: "Why wouldn't we favour a trade deal with Canada? Canada's awesome," said Michele Montgomery. "I do lots of work with Canada... I like keeping my friends happy. And I have friends in Canada, so I'd like to see them happy."

'Canadians are such nice people'

One Republican deadpanned that he worried about the northern border. In the next split-second, he made clear he was joking: "No, we're not really worried about the Canadians," said Jeff Hommedahl, alternate delegate from Minnesota.

"Canadians are such nice people anyway. They're kind of like Minnesotans."

He said he supported trade with Canada because living standards are similar, as are salaries. He wouldn't expect American workers to lose jobs like they do because of commerce with poorer countries.

Loren Spivack said the purpose of border walls is stopping illegal migration: "The idea of a wall with Canada is kind of ridiculous," said Spivack, who displayed conservative-themed comic books outside the convention. "The border's 3,000 miles long — and there's not much of an illegal immigration problem with Canada."

'Why does Canada not have a wall?'

Closer to the Rio Grande, some people see a double-standard.

Enrique Morones is an advocate for southern migrants who drops water bottles in the desert to help them survive. It's true migration is a far bigger issue in the south but, he says, terrorism is also a concern in the north.

He's calling racism on it.

"Why does Canada not have a wall? We don't want them to have a wall. But why not? Because they have the same background (as the U.S.) — Anglo-Protestant. If the people in Canada were brown or black, you bet there'd be a wall," said Morones, who leads the California-based group Border Angels.

"But it's like a cousin — the first cousin of the United States. You're the same people. You're white. That's why there's no wall... It's a double-standard."

On rare occasions, U.S. media have questioned candidates about the differing rhetoric towards the two neighbours.

One politician got tangled in it.

Scott Walker said he'd consider a wall

NBC raised the issue with Scott Walker who replied that, yes, maybe a wall with Canada was worth considering. He was widely ridiculed; Trump brushed off the idea; and it was one of the final nails in the coffin of Walker's presidential campaign.

Canada's government is perfectly pleased to remain in the background of this story. Officials say there aren't any plans to follow Mexico's lead and invite the election candidates to Ottawa.

Meanwhile, the embassy in Washington is quietly engaged in behind-the-scenes outreach, and gathering research on how the players in the next White House and Congress might shape important issues.

"It doesn't matter who I meet with — they're always friendly. It's amazing the number of times you see somebody and they say, 'I can't do anything to Canada because my wife's Canadian, or, 'My daughter goes to U of T,'" says Canada's ambassador, David MacNaughton.

"At that level there's an enormous amount of goodwill... That's all good. (But) when you get right down to the nitty-gritty, the issues that matter, they're tough.... What's in it for them?... 'What's it mean to my district, my state?'"

In the U.S. Congress, potential trade disputes loom over Canadian dairy imports and softwood-lumber exports.

North of the border, these pass for top-level bilateral irritants.

Also on HuffPost:

Close



9 Other Absurd Things Donald Trump Has Said About Latinos

of





When Trump announced his candidacy in June 2015, he infamously referred to Mexican immigrants as "criminals" and "rapists" while calling to erect a border wall. A month later, he paid an impromptu visit to the U.S.- Mexico border in Laredo, Texas and explained why "the Hispanics" (As monolithic to Mr. Trump as the blacks and the Muslims) were going to "love" him. “There’s great danger with the illegals,” Trump told reporters, before insisting he had a "great relationship" with Latinos.

The GOP candidate has insisted on building a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, despite critics, like John Oliver, breaking down why it's an expensive and futile idea. In response, Trump assured voters he’d force Mexico to pay for the wall. He sent a two-page memo to The Washington Post in April explaining his plan, which includes confiscating money that Mexican migrants in the U.S. send to Mexico until the Mexican government agreed to make a one-time payment to the United States of “$5-10 billion.” Former Mexican presidents Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderón promptly fired back at Trump over the proposal. “Mexican people, we are not going to pay any single cent for such a stupid wall,” Calderón said in an interview with CNBC. “And it’s going to be completely useless."

The ongoing legal battle over whether Trump University is what former employees have called a "fraudulent scheme" took an even uglier turn during a February rally when the candidate implied the judge handling the lawsuits against him was biased because of his Hispanic heritage. First, Trump identified the judge as "Spanish," which is what some erroneously call people who they believe speak Spanish. When in fact, "Spanish" should only be used to describe people from Spain. The federal judge Trump was referring to is Gonzalo Curiel, who was born and raised in Indiana to parents who emigrated from Mexico.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Trump doubled down on his comments about Curiel and said the federal judge had "an inherent conflict of interest" in the Trump University cases because of his Mexican heritage. More specifically, Trump suggested that the judge would treat him unfairly because of his plans to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. He continually ignored the fact that Curiel was an American, born and raised in the United StatesIn an interview with CNN's "The Lead with Jake Tapper," on June 3, Trump continued his attacks against Curiel with the above statement, followed swiftly by: "I am going to do very well with the Hispanics, the Mexicans --"

As proof that Judge Curiel was biased because of his Mexican heritage, Trump repeatedly pointed out that the federal judge was a member of the San Diego chapter of the La Raza Lawyers Association. In an interview with CBS' Face the Nation he named it as a reason for Curiel's alleged bias. On the topic, San Diego chapter president Luis Osuna told The Huffington Post: “A lot of people are assuming that since it’s called ‘La Raza lawyers’ that it’s only Mexicans. But we consist of 300 members: judges, lawyers, law students, non-legal professionals that work in the legal field.” He added that members are “Latino, non-Latino, Mexican, non-Mexican, Caucasian.”