Hohenberg v. Ferrero USA, Inc

Filing
34

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
In re FERRERO LITIGATION,
CASE NO. 11-CV-205 H (CAB)
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
12
13
.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
On March 24, 2011, Defendant Ferrero U.S.A., Inc. filed a motion to transfer this
consolidated action. (Doc. No. 19.) On May 2, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition
to Defendant’s motion. (Doc. No. 33.) On May 2, 2011, Plaintiffs also filed an ex parte
motion for leave to file under seal portions of their opposition and exhibits in support of their
opposition. (Doc. No. 33-4.) Specifically, Defendants seek to file under seal the following
documents:
(1)
Portions of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Ferrero’s Motion to Transfer Venue.
(2)
Exhibit B to the Declaration of Jack Fitzgerald in Opposition to Ferrero’s
23
Motion to Transfer Venue, excerpts from the deposition transcript of Ferrero’s
24
25
26
27
CEO, Bernard Kreilmann, that Ferrero designated “Confidential.”
(3)
Exhibit C to the Declaration of Jack Fitzgerald in Opposition to Ferrero’s
Motion to Transfer Venue, a document produced by Ferrero in response to
Interrogatories, which Ferrero designated “Confidential.”
28
-1-
11cv205
1
(4)
Exhibit D to the Declaration of Jack Fitzgerald in Opposition to Ferrero’s
2
Motion to Transfer Venue, a document produced by Ferrero in response to
3
Interrogatories, which Ferrero designated “Confidential.”
4
(5)
Exhibit E to the Declaration of Jack Fitzgerald in Opposition to Ferrero’s
5
Motion to Transfer Venue, a printout of native Microsoft Excel file produced by
6
Ferrero on a CD marked FERRERO001234-001270, and further marked
7
“CONFIDENTIAL.”
8
(6)
Exhibit F to the Declaration of Jack Fitzgerald in Opposition to Ferrero’s
9
Motion to Transfer Venue, the first 10 pages of a document produced by Ferrero
10
bearing production numbers FERRERO000134-001128, which Ferrero
11
designated “Confidential.”
12
(7)
Exhibit J to the Declaration of Jack Fitzgerald in Opposition to Ferrero’s Motion
13
to Transfer Venue, a table created by Plaintiffs concerning possible third-party
14
witnesses containing information derived from sources Ferrero designated
15
“Confidential.”
16 Plaintiffs seek to seal the exhibits because they contain information that has been designated
17 by Defendant as “Confidential” under the terms of the protective order. (Doc. No. 33-4 at 1.)
18
After reviewing the documents in question, the Court concludes that good cause exists
19 to seal the exhibits. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ request to file the documents
20 under seal without prejudice to the Court modifying this order at a later time.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22 DATED: May 4, 2011
23
______________________________
24
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
25
26
27
28
-2-
11cv205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.