Wonder what you would find if you frisked the United Nations Conference on Climate Change in Cancun, Mexico?

Answer: A bunch of climate change wing-nuts.

I swear, some of these climate change conferences are loaded with a bunch of global warming zombies, because they will sign anything that includes key phrases like, ”global effort,” “international community,” and “planetary.” The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) traveled to Mexico to attend the United Nations Conference on Climate Change and proved just how programmed these folks truly are:

This year, CFACT students created two mock-petitions to test U.N. Delegates. The first asked participants to help destabilize the United States economy, the second to ban water.

The first project, entitled “Petition to Set a Global Standard” sought to isolate and punish the United States of America for defying the international community, by refusing to bite, hook, line and sinker on the bait that is the Kyoto Protocol. The petition went so far as to encourage the United Nations to impose tariffs and trade restrictions on the U.S. in a scheme to destabilize the nation’s economy. Specifically, the scheme seeks to lower the U.S. GDP by 6% over a ten year period, unless the U.S. signs a U.N. treaty on global warming.

This would be an extremely radical move by the United Nations. Even so, radical left-wing environmentalists from around the world scrambled eagerly to sign.

The second project was as successful as the first. It was euphemistically entitled “Petition to Ban the Use of Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO)” (translation water). It was designed to show that if official U.N. delegates could be duped by college students into banning water, that they could essentially fall for anything, including pseudo-scientific studies which claim to show that global warming is man-caused.

Despite the apparently not-so-obvious reference to H2O, almost every delegate that collegian students approached signed their petition to ban that all too dangerous substance, which contributes to the greenhouse effect, is the major substance in acid rain, and is fatal if inhaled.

Granted, I would not have recognized “Dihydrogen Monoxide” as water, but then again, I am not a scientist… I am a “political-advertiser-social-media-graphic-design-tist” (Awesome, right?). I would hope these individuals attending this conference would know their “stuff” a little better. After all, these are the hippies that would rather see the United States’ economy crumble, than see a tree get cut down by a logger on the show Ax Men.

The video experiment helps us draw one of two conclusions: a) these people are absolutely clueless, or b) they really do hate water. Either way, who really thinks these people should be considered “experts” when it comes to science?

Seriously… These climate change scientists just don’t get it: It’s not rocket science! I guess some people will try to convince you of anything if they’re on the verge of getting grant money taken away.

FOX News (I know what you’re thinking, but the liberal mainstream media will never report this kind of breaking news) reports:

NASA was able to put a man on the moon, but the space agency can’t tell you what the temperature was when it did. By its own admission, NASA’s temperature records are in even worse shape than the besmirched Climate-gate data.

E-mail messages obtained by a Freedom of Information Act request reveal that NASA concluded that its own climate findings were inferior to those maintained by both the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) — the scandalized source of the leaked Climate-gate e-mails — and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center.

The e-mails from 2007 reveal that when a USA Today reporter asked if NASA’s data “was more accurate” than other climate-change data sets, NASA’s Dr. Reto A. Ruedy replied with an unequivocal no. He said “the National Climatic Data Center’s procedure of only using the best stations is more accurate,” admitting that some of his own procedures led to less accurate readings.

[…]

“NASA’s temperature data is worse than the Climate-gate temperature data. According to NASA,” wrote Christopher Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute who uncovered the e-mails. Horner is skeptical of NCDC’s data as well, stating plainly: “Three out of the four temperature data sets stink.“

Wonderful… 🙄 If you’re curious about how the “good” folks at NASA could screw up this badly, click on the article link above and read up on it. Personally, I bet most of you will find it quite assuming. Hint: 90% of the thermometers are placed in areas that could easily create a bias influence.

Once again, this proves that global warming is NOT fact. Will this big news story even be reported by the liberal mainstream media? I highly doubt it. Unfortunately, skeptics – like me – will still be labeled as ‘crazies,’ while heat, snow, fog, drought, sleet, rain, lightning, hurricanes, and drunken Easter Bunnies remain obvious signs of global warming. Silly liberals!

A seven-month-old girl miraculously survived alone for three days after one of her parents shot her in the chest – apparently as part of a bizarre murder-suicide pact blamed on global warming.

The baby was discovered with a bullet casing in her chest and covered with blood by police in the Argentinean city of Goya, near the bodies of her parents and 2-year-old brother, the Latin American Herald reported Saturday.

Police broke into the home after neighbors complained of a stench coming from the house. The boy was found with a gunshot wound in his back, while his parents died from gunshot wounds to the chest.

A letter was found on a table expressing the couple’s anger at the government for not responding to the environmental crisis.

Doctors said the baby’s condition has been improving every day, the Herald Tribune reported.

😯 What the…!?!? It’s a miracle their baby managed to stay alive.

I realize Al Gore and the other climate change scientists are on their own personal missions to push this junk science on the world in order to line their own pockets, but when does enough become enough?

For 15 Democratic and 6 Republican Congressmen, food and rooms for two nights cost $4,406 tax dollars each. That’s $2,200 a day – more than most Americans spend on their monthly mortgage payment.

[…]

The group expense report was filed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. She wouldn’t talk about it when our producer tried to ask.

Pelosi’s office did offer an explanation for the high room charges. Those who stayed just two nights were charged a six-night minimum at the five-star Marriott. One staffer said, they strongly objected to no avail. You may ask how they’ll negotiate a climate treaty, if they can’t get a better deal on hotel rooms.

Flights weren’t cheap, either. Fifty-nine House and Senate staff flew commercial during the Copenhagen rush. They paid government rates — $5-10,000 each — totaling $408,064. Add three military jets — $168,351 just for flight time — and the bill tops $1.1 million dollars — not including all the Obama administration officials who attended: well over 60.

Remember: There was nothing accomplished at this Climate Change Summit in Denmark besides successfully polluting the planet even more. I hope our politicians and government officials enjoyed their nice little vacation, because – as always – it is not on their own tab. Don’t get me wrong, I understand that Congressmen need to fly around on occasion, but this is just absurdity. $2,200 for a hotel room and food for a day!? 😡 This is atrocious government spending at its finest. If any politician is trying to find out where to make budget cuts – which will probably never happen – they better be slamming their fingers down on this Congressional expense report!

Side-Note: Perhaps we should start a national raffle where a few citizens are chosen every year to have a week’s vacation paid for by the politicians in Washington DC. Wait a second… We pay their salaries… Damn, there goes that idea.

And why was the Ways and Means chair – Charlie Rangel – at the Climate Change Summit on the taxpayer’s dime? That question still baffles me.