Screen Door Hits Obama's Ass In...

Get Alerts For New Posts!

Sign up (free of course!) and we'll email you when there's fresh mischief to see here on the site! We'll never send spam, and never share your information with any government agencies even if we're waterboarded and forced to listen to "Barney" songs. Don't want emails? Then check the other subscription options below!

Want to Comment?

Click on the cartoon's title and it will reopen with comments displayed and a place to add your own. Join the fun!

Search Cartoons By Topic

HnC is co-winner of the 2012 Daniel Simpson Day Award for Best Graphics!

Followers

Now That He's Screwed Us For the 58th Time...

Welcome to Hope n' Change 2.0!

In the face of a collapsing economy, rampant unemployment, and global instability, Barack Hussein Obama took office in 2008 promising Hope and Change. The "Hope" thing didn't really work out, but we got plenty of "Change" as everything got worse. And now, the jug-eared jackass has a second term.

That's why at Hope n' Change Cartoons, we're creating conservative smartaleckry to provide a little laughter in these strange times. Cartoons will probably be posted Monday and Wednesday, and definitely on Friday. Additionally, cartoons and graphics will be posted randomly on our Facebook page and Friday we'll add the week's postings right here to kick around in one of the greatest comments sections on the Web.Note: please feel free to repost our cartoons on your favorite blogs!

Need Free Stock Footage or Music?

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Following a valiant but ultimately futile fight for life following the tragic shootings in Tucson, journalism was officially declared dead yesterday.

For four days, the biggest story in the news was a story that the press and politicians made up; that Jared Lee Loughner was influenced by a "climate of hate" created by conservatives who called for fiscal responsibility, transparency in government, and return to the principles of our Constitution.

And it wasn't easy for the press; in order to keep the story going, they not only had to manufacture their talking points, they had to ignore all of the real facts.

But yesterday, in the biggest unauthorized disclosure of "top secret" information since Wikileaks, a friend of Loughner's confirmed that he never watched the news and wasn't interested in politics. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal (a newspaper which archaically still relies on facts) published Loughner's online rants in which he lambasted teachers and cops, claimed that college girls enjoy rape, and said that he was disturbed by his inability to find a job.

Sarah Palin has labeled the press's actions "blood libel," and she's exactly right. And while Hope n' Change is strongly against curtailing free speech, we believe that libel should still be punishable in a court of law...and that every politician and member of the press who has babbled about the rightwing "climate of hate" in the past week should find themselves in the dock.

Although ironically, their actions have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is a poisonous "climate of hate" being aggressively pushed in America.

Oddly enough, they have it 100% backwards. What drives me crazy enough to entertain thoughts of going postal is the Liberal Lamestream Media that never gets it and always disrespects me, my God and my Country. They are the real reason people are getting angry. If Civil War II ever does break out in the U. S. A. it will be because REAL AMERICANS have no other option. Oddly enough, Liberals love terrorists so maybe then they will love us - Naaaaaaaa, we will still be from the land they hate!

I'm getting so tired of all this "laying aside our differences" (i.e. Reps go to the back of the bus) and "cool the rhetoric" (i.e. shut up and just obey the fuhrer)....I didn't watch the speech but the photos on Fox of the President and First Lady trying valiantly to "put on their sad faces" was enough for me. And then every media was reporting that Giffords opened her eyes immediately after Obama left, as if he were some sort of Messiah...was enough to make anyone sick. (She was probably just peeking to make sure he was gone. I would have.)

I read some comments yesterday that were certainly interesting...they are hailing the quick response to Rep. Giffords' injuries...which saved her life...American health care in action....could we say that 5 years from now, if it is not repealed? No less, her trauma surgeon was military who had spent time in the middle east (Yay for military).

This whole entire situation is just a twisted political mess. A little girl died. A judge died. I'd say we should just respect the dead and quietly get on with things...but the Democrats started this angry mess...so somehow it has to wrap up, too.

Stilton:I hesitate to argue with your assertion that the death of journalism occurred this week, but personally I think it died during the Clenis administration. What we are experiencing now are journalistic zombies, the walking dead, still stiffly plying their "craft" and feeding on the souls of the innocent. My proof: A living human would care about their credibility and cling to some shred of honor. A zombie only cares about its next meal.

A lovely speech. Don't know who wrote it, but they should be given some kind of award. Da Prez delivered it flawlessly, w/ help from TOTUS, of course. The pseudo-melodrama of "good news! I walked into her room, and she opened her eye, and made a 'thumbs up'" was, indeed, more than a touch messianic. And considering he's basically been sucking one thumb, and warming the other all week, disturbingly ironic...

I think one of her eyes is bandaged, but I did hear the president say she opened her "eyes." Did he get his facts wrong, too? My nonmedical guess is the medication keeping her in a coma was reduced. I'm not going to presume there was any purposeful timing of that likelihood. I'm ok with the president's words last night. They weren't of historical importance, but if they helped comfort those in pain, that's good. I'll also guess that this is not the last we've heard about this incident from this president. I'm all ears. Loved Lesson Two. See? We're already being kinder and gentler.

Mitch- Our president has asked us to "speak in a way that heals, not in a way that wounds." But here you are, not even 24 hours later, throwing around hurtful words and sarcastically suggesting that other commentors hear "voices in your head," which is not only unnecessarily hurtful and argumentative, but seems to deliberately mock and belittle the pain suffered by the victims of Jared Lee Loughner's schizophrenia.

Mitch, just because the president is black doesn't mean you shouldn't at least try to respect his advice.

A couple dozen of our fellow citizens are mowed down by a gunman. The President shows up a couple days later for a political rally compleate with new campaign type phrase, pamphlets and shirts built around said phrase and leads a cheering crowd through its paces. The Press, including most of talk radio, Fox News etc enthusiastically joins in -- showering him with praise. I feel like the only negro at a KKK rally -- I have to first turn the sound down to nothing and then switch to an old movie before I start projectile vomiting.

More and more I think I have been dropped off on the wrong planet. My only comfort is the knowlege I will die and die soon -- a small and weak one. If I live more than another 2 or 3 years I will be hopelessly poor, unable to work yet forced to spend every penny of my live long savings on "health insurance" -- back to living on mac and cheese dinners made with the giant blocks of cheap grease, scrambled eggs and baked potatoes until the cancer finished me. At least I am not bitter.

moronpolitics- It was the "State of the Union" type cheers, applause, and hoo-rahs from the crowd that I found most upsetting. Obama is a politician, and he was doing what politicians do (and frankly had a well-written speech).

But there was a time when a crowd of Americans would understand the solemnity of the moment... instead of destroying that atmosphere with pep rally style cheers. Sadly, they made clear that for too many people this isn't a tragedy as much as another enjoyable round of political blood sport.

Mr. Cheese, I'm sure your readers appreciate you springing to the defense of their sanity, but one of them justifies "going postal because "...Liberal Lamestream Media that never gets it and always disrespects me, my God and my Country."

Really, some medium somewhere not "getting it" is sufficient to exact capital punishment?

I think, Mr. Cheese, that some of your readers have more in common with Jared Loughner than I do.

Mitch regarding your earlier post...its listening to the news that messed us up in the first place...initial reports were that she opened her eyes for Obama. Secondary reports are that she opened them after he left.

Current reports state she opened her one unbandaged eye for her husband and family and that her husband told Obama about it and asked him to share it with the public during his speech (or whatever).

The media was trying to make Obama seem like the Messiah...when in reality, now we find out that not only was the killer unrelated to politics and talk radio, but Obama had absolutely nothing to do with Giffords' improvement.

So...now that that's cleared up....you can go back to listening to your OWN voices....

Mitch, you may be right - I may well have misheard the President when they re-played that clip this am. I fully admit to paying more attention to my razor and what it was doing. Taht having been said, it's well documented that when 'the greatest orator of our time' goes 'off book' accuracy and/or reality may take a beating (57 states, anyone?)So, whether I mis-heard or he mis-sequenced, the overall tone of that bit (I showed up, she woke up! A Miracle) was off putting.

As for who has more in common w/ the psycho shooter, perhaps you protest too much? I was not aware of anyone making that comparison, other than you commenting that perhaps I was hearing voices? Is that worse than reading text that isn't there?

January 13, 2011 7:42 AM Suzy said... "I didn't watch the speech but the photos on Fox [of course] of the President and First Lady trying valiantly to "put on their sad faces" was enough for me."

January 13, 2011 10:01 AM Stilton Jarlsberg said..."Mitch- Our president has asked us to "speak in a way that heals, not in a way that wounds." But here you are, not even 24 hours later, throwing around hurtful words..."

Mr. Cheese - I really don't have any time for any "healing" nonsense, I'm much too busy with my role in the International Chambers of Commerce to worry about any one nation's petty problems.

My particular area of expertise is invoved in convincing all attractive young men around the world to choose to be homosexual. The unattractive ones are more useful as cannon fodder in our various wars we used to fund the military-industrial complex.

Of course, that leaves vast numbers of attractive women in the world, whom we will sort into fertile and infertile. The fertile ones will be sent to re-fitted factory farms for breeding purposes, as I'm sure you know from the invitation we sent you, only the best and brightest people, like yourself, are invited to contribute precious bodily fluids to the breeding program.

The rest of the women will find useful occupations in arms manufacturing, service, in our restaurants and bordellos, cleaning our offices and lugging the recyclables to sorting centers, which will also employ them.

Thank you for continuing to do your part, Mr. Cheese, of keeping your people suitably distracted from the real issues coming down the pike.

If you're listening to News/Talk radio in the morning and you hear something from the 'talk show host,' it's entirely probable that - unless the subject is something personal - the 'host' does not have first hand information on the subject.

It is a personal rule of thumb of mine that the further away a piece of news is from 'first hand,' the less reliable I expect it to be.

Poor ole' Mitch... LOL, practicing the art of pulling "The Full Alinsky" again... We can only hope that Mitch's local Sheriff has a closer eye on him than the buffoon in Pima County did on Jared Loughner.

Here is a great screw-up from Obama. You know how he turned the memorial into a "Look at ME" pep rally with the Together We Can Tee-shirts? Well if you go out to www.togetherwethrive.com it's a site that links you to porno. HAHAHAHAHA what a screw-up. There is your next cartoon.

Well, Rick, you have uncovered even more evidence that Obama owns a time machine.

See, first he used it to go back in time and plant that fake birth announcement in the Hawaii newspaper. Now he's used it again to travel back to 12-02-2010 to register "www.togetherwethrive.com" which is actually a placeholder and not a porn site at all, I know you were badly disappointed.

Mitch - "It is a personal rule of thumb of mine that the further away a piece of news is from 'first hand,' the less reliable I expect it to be."

Most reasonable thing you've said in ages. I have NO idea, nor did I claim to, as to the actual sequence of events. All I said was that the President's comments, as played back in his own words, seemed lame.

Mitch- asserting that Obama's birth announcement is fake is divisive and the sort of talk that we hoped would be a thing of the past now. And then, in your very next post, you claim the president is from Africa instead of Hawaii! And as Bill Maher has reminded us, that's code for using the n-word.

IF, after more FACTS are learned about what this nutjob assasin is all about,(which is nothing but being totally deranged), and lawmakers (R and D alike) continue on a course to take away our freedom of speech....we will know that the cliff this country is precariously perched upon right now is starting to give way, and into the abyss we will all go.

Butters- The idea that free speech should be limited to hushed drawing room tones and avoidance of disagreement pretty much negates the purpose of free speech. I doubt that much will come of the legislative assaults...but it's frightening that there are elected officials who even think its appropriate to go down that road.

Who wants to place a bet that Mitch not only owns, but proudly wears, a "Che Guevara T-Shirt" on special occasions? I mean, after all, Htde wore one on "That 70's Show"... and Hyde was cool... right? Uhh, right?

And actually, I try to never rely on anything but first hand news sources. And I never allow Bill Maher on my television set.

But, hoping against hope that the media was erroneous in its reportage, I did click on a linky which showed Maher's appearance with Larry King (and you can too!) in which he declares that "Kenyan means nigger."

I apologize to everyone for quoting such a dreadful word, but I was afraid if I altered or bowdlerized it, the quote might not be acceptable for your standards of admissable evidence.

So sadly, even Bill Maher is calling you out as a racist. And he probably doesn't even know about your whole gay-bashing, female sex farm, anger management issues - all of which you know about first hand.

I'm hesitant to call you "Doctor," without reading the degrees on your wall, but since you are both Jarlsberg and Stilton, I'll just call you Cheeses.

So, Cheeses, after I lit a candle for Al Gore, I consulted the internets to look into your claim that Maher said "Kenyan means Nigger" (and, of course, it is offensive that a publisher has taken that word from "Huckleberry Finn" so it must not be offensive to use it, right Cheeses?

In point of fact, in the Larry King clip, Maher actually says "Kenyan is code for Nigger," which is only offensive if you're a clown in Bozell's Big Circus and you don't want it known that the Tea Party folks use code words and dog whistles.

As a journalist myself ... I always try NOT to post replies to those like Mitch. Mainly, because I refuse to get in a battle of wits, with an unarmed person. It is almost always a waste of time.Keep up the good work Doctor Stilton!

Mitch- This grows increasingly sad. I imagine the bitter salt tears that you weep while shaving your head and talking to yourself, and I ache for you.

You started the day by thinking the most important issue in the world was whether Congresswoman Giffords opened one eye or both eyes, and attacking anyone who didn't hear the single news source you cited.

You then seemed to think that you've produced an "aha!" moment when you say that "Kenyan means Nigger" is not the same as "Kenyan is code for Nigger." You assert that the word is not offensive (to which we really must take exception), and then speculate that the words Tea Party members use mean things that you can understand, but no one else does.

You refer to me as a journalist - a claim I've never even remotely made, and which I make explicit in the legal notice at the bottom of every page. This "journalist" is a phantasm; a figment of your tortured imagination.

And you seem confused by labels and identities in general. Mister or doctor? Kenyan or nigger? And of course there is your increasingly obvious anger directed at women and Gays (which is fairly easy to interpret), and your repeated attacks on the president's race.

After which you inject an oxymoronic statement about your great grandfather - with whom, as far as we know - you had some personal contact which may explain your confusion about relating to women and Gay men.

Please Mitch...take a deep breath, and decide that you're not going to hate yourself anymore. Because that's the first step towards being able to love others.

Remember: it's all about words that heal instead of words that wound. Which is why if anyone here calls you a douchenozzle, I shall give them a very firm reprimand.

Suzy- It's not about counting replies or words. It's about reaching out to help. And I'd like to think all our hard work today will help you-know-who understand that we're pulling for him, with love in our hearts.

Actually Mitch ... my comment was NOT in the manner of a reply to your posts, any of them.

However, this one is.

My original post on this days' cartoon was directed toward the relevant conversation, and for the interaction of others on this board.

Just so I might clear up any misunderstanding that might be going around in your obviously convoluted series of synapses ... my comment was directed to the group, but yes it was referring to you. Close, but not quite the same thing as responding directly to your postings.

Might I suggest you go back and reread your textbooks, and this time study the English language? Pay particular attention to 'sentence structure' and 'grammatical reference'. To be directed towards you personally, my statement required the addition of ONE WORD, which was notably absent. On purpose.

Other than this time, (Yes, this post is directed specifically to you) you will not normally find me responding to those who are so clear in the statements they make that it is obvious to all literate personages that they are personally and mentally unconnected from reality, and there really is no hope for ever redirecting their mental focus into something other than stirring the proverbial s@#! pot, in hopes of finding out if it still smells. Take my word for it, it does, and its' name is Liberalism. AKA Socialism / Communism / Progressive Democratic Party, etc., etc., ad nauseum.

Were it not for the fact that I am a nationally known, and often published, journalist I would have merely answered your last post with an old military acronym ... "F.O.E.S.A.D." Then again, that kind of short and concise answer would have merely been 'responding in kind' to your posts that obviously are disconnected from reality, and contain nothing but mindless 'scripted rhetoric', straight from the Socialists Playbook.

Stilton,Did you zap my response to our friend Mitch? I posted it, refreshed and it showed posted ... then next refresh it went into la la land?Or is it the 'net problem that is careening around the world right now, causing dns errors?

anonymous directly above ... As usual,liberals miss the ENTIRE POINT! My guess is they have been drinking far too much of the Big O's kool-aid, which has obviously rotted the sensibilities out of their brains. Thsi causes them to immediately resort to MORE ACCUSATIONS and offensive statements when proven to be wrong and completely out of line!

It was NOT that they (the bought and paid for MSM) reported on it ... it was that they made up tales to make it more sensational and tried everything they could to focus blame on the big bad tea party and Palin! All of which have now been PROVEN 100% FALSE, but they could not wait to follow the messiah's orders and use every chance to demean and focus BS on the conservatives, so Obummer would look good! THAT is NOT journalism, it is self-serving PROPAGANDA!

THAT is the point being made herein! NOT the fact it was reported, as it should have been, but that the reports were full of conjecture, accusations, assumptions based on nothing but hate, and down right self serving lies!

Americans expect this kind of garbage from European and communist propaganda ministers and such ... but NOT from true journalists, who used to answer to things like personal and professional integrity. Unfortunately, far too many of my fellow writers now just follow the money and say whatever they are told to say! A VERY SAD STATE OF AFFAIRS!

Doc - Northern Nevada & Readers- Doc was responding to an "Anonymous" poster who may have been Mitch, or may simply have been an asshole. In either case, I deleted the post. In essence, it claimed that conservatives are upset because the coverage of the Tucson massacre "reveals" rightwing ugliness...as opposed to our actual disgust that the Left would actually use the blood of innocents to try to stain the reputations of those they can't defeat ideologically.

Doc, your comment is right on target and was perfectly sufficient to deal with this troll. But since suffering trolls lately has proved to be a waste of time, I nuked his message.

And somewhere, a liberal in a red G-string is asking his mother for comfort.

Free Hope n' Change Ebook!

Click book cover for download instructions

Legal Disclaimer, Terms of Use, And Other Lawyerly Stuff

DISCLAIMERThe thoughts and opinions expressed in the cartoons and commentary section represent the personal opinions of the author, which are subject to change over time, and which are reasonably eccentric even on good days. These opinions are intended to be entertaining, stimulating, and occasionally challenging but are in no way intended to do harm. HopeNChange Cartoons should not be considered a reliable news source, but instead as an advocacy entertainment outlet much like MSNBC, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, and the New York Times.

Opinions expressed in the Comments section are the sole responsibility of the people who post those comments, and HopeNChange Cartoons accepts no responsibility for the content of those comments. Additionally, by submitting comments you agree to subject your opinions to peer review and remarks, which means you may get conversationally kicked around like a soccer ball, or accused of being something small and moist found in the back of a dark cave. Furthermore, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless the owners of this website, its staff, and its subsidiaries. By submitting e-mails and comments to this site you agree to the above policy. The owners of this website also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any other related information collected on this service) in the event of a formal complaint or legal action arising from any situation caused by your use of this forum.FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been pre-authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, social, art, media, and cultural issues. The 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material that may exist on this site is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to persons interested in such information for research and educational purposes. If you want to use any copyrighted material that may exist on this site for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you feel that any of the images used on this site infringe on YOUR rights, please contact us via the e-mail posted on this page and we will happily comply with your request and remove them. All original photos and montages posted on this site are owned by me and marked to distinguish. "Hope n' Change" Cartoons may be freely reposted for non-profit use without additional permission, but must contain the full header, author's name, and copyright information. Material from this site may not be collected, printed, or sold in any form without specific permission from the author - who may be, for all you know, a bloodsucking parasitic lawyer just aching to file a lawsuit, take your life savings, and leave nothing more than your dried and dessicated carcass like a dead mayfly on a windowsill.

Individuals, entities, or groups legally affiliated with any governmental organization, investigative body, or the Internal Revenue Service agree that accessing this site constitutes a review of the political beliefs of the author, and subsequent actions, investigations, or audits of the author constitute a deliberate and premeditated attack on the author's first amendment rights, the damages for which will make the Pigford settlement look like a joke.HopeNChange Cartoons is based in, and subject to the laws of, the United States. We are neither cognizant of nor responsible for the laws in any other countries, districts, emirates, theocracies, principalities, directorates, or dictatorships. Additionally, the cartoons and commentary are published in English, and we accept no responsibility for words or opinions which may appear differently or have offensive meanings in other languages or alleged cultures.