Introduction to Foster Gamble's Documentary THRIVE

For
those in medical school studying to be doctors, their parents, and
also those who are already in the medical profession, please watch
the 15 minute segment of this two hour documentary from time 42:45 to
57:45

What
is interesting in this 15 minute must-watch segment is that its
distinguished compere, Foster Gamble, a Princeton University graduate
and its student body president, direct descendant of one of the
founders of Proctor and Gamble, groomed to be a leader in the
establishment but choosing to walk away from his inherited power
legacy to instead become a responsible activist for humanity, takes
on the real power behind the world today - the banking cartel which
owns and/or controls medicine, agriculture, pharma, not to mention
central banking and coining national money out of thin air! This is
the first time I have seen a notable insider from the elite
corporatocracy take on this prime-mover of social and political
control in our era. There have been others in the past but I don't
immediately recall anyone contemporary. Please watch that short
segment which pertains to medicine, food, education and fractional
reserve lending --- in that 15 minutes this documentary summarizes
what I have researched and restated time and again which no one pays
any attention to. Whereas, coming from an insider of real power and
pelf, I think this exposé of the banking cartel's role in
controlling medicine, food, and big pharma from one among the elite
themselves, is more compelling!

However,
also note that in earlier segments of the documentary (if you have
time to watch the whole thing), Foster Gamble evidently falls into
the same trap as I have noted many prominent activists uncannily seem
to also fall into --- the UFO rubbish of Steven Greer et. al., and
other similar speculations of free energy brought to us by the aliens
which I can only call "gibberish". Ignore that crap, or,
take the pseudo science gibberish with a pinch of astute political
science salt. Bizarrely salted to Hegelian proportions by
intelligence ops as I have already deconstructed in the case study of
Steven Greer's Disclosure Project, [1] do note that even in these
outlandish and speculative segments there are many kernels of hard
scientific and political truths wrapped in garbage --- the calculated
suppression of science such as Nikola Tesla's work for instance,
shrewdly accompanied by UFO exponents. Why rational, well referenced,
empirical, verifiable, factual expositions of any of these topics
pertaining to the role of omnipotent banking power in orchestrating
society and politics, are almost always accompanied by outlandish
gibberish and speculations is explainable, at least to my mind.

It
appears to be a calculated self-defense mechanism of brilliant people
based on the idea of poisoning their own well. Whenever they speak
some verifiable truth, they also seem to utter some unverifiable and
outlandish rubbish --- which is so incongruent to their other factual
and verifiable words that only the foolish masses would either accept
it all or reject it all; the smarter handful among the public would
know to discern rationally and to throw away the poisonous shell
carefully protecting the fruit within. Because I have seen this
pattern repeat time and again, such as David Icke who is also
featured later on in the documentary speaking on the banking cartel
but who also speaks the "UFO" and "shape-shifting
reptile" gibberish elsewhere, [2] that I can only sensibly
conclude that it is a self-defense mechanism for some genuine
activists to calculatingly appear "nutty" when speaking the
whole truth against the most powerful prime-movers on earth! Others
may well believe that gibberish, I don't know. There are of course a
whole sleuth of Machiavellian techniques of cognitive infiltration
available to the intelligence apparatuses and its Mighty Wurlitzer
for putting dissent on treadmills which go nowhere. [2a] [2b] The
discerning mind must forensically analyze all matters, and all
interconnections among them, to synthesize the whole picture which is
often larger than the sum of its parts. The Japanese wisdom
admonishes: “Aspire to be like Mt. Fuji, with such a broad and
solid foundation that the strongest earthquake cannot move you, and
so tall that the greatest enterprises of common men seem
insignificant from your lofty perspective. With your mind as high as
Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the
forces that shape events; not just the things happening near to you.”

In
any case, the segment I draw your attention to is 100% accurate and
anyone can verify its factual basis. I have done so time and again
and even written about it. The subsequent segments on the control of
the world by the banking cartel is also on the mark --- as I have
researched and concluded the same. I also know of the deliberate
suppression of alternate medicine by associating it with quackery.
Not to say that quackery in medicine does not exist, but not all
alternate ways of looking at the healing arts and science are
quackery! To assert it is so is clearly the obvious motivation of
entrenched power not just protecting its own economic turf, but also
its cunningly weaved fabric of human control --- and the fact that an
insider is highlighting these matters so boldly is something to pay
attention to. I think.

That
segment on medicine is also important because foolish doctors today
are not only prescribing poisons under AMA licensing, but also cheer
leading advocacy of social evils at national levels as PR spokesman
of big medicine --- case in point: the recent WHO directive for polio
vaccination in Pakistan, Syria, and Cameroon. If I was in any policy
making position in Pakistan, my take would be that a) our scientists
will research it ourselves, and b) if deemed necessary, our nation
will manufacture our own vaccines ab initio so that we know exactly
what we are putting in them --- a position Iran has wisely taken!
This is quite a separate question from the efficacy of vaccines in
the first place which I am not addressing here. Science reveals to me
that vaccines are efficacious for delivering payloads into the
biological systems. Whether it is good for the human beings is a
separate issue. Not addressed today. Please don't go off wandering
into a red herring. The discussion here is of what is --- and that in
itself is inimical.

Also
pay attention to the quote by Henry Kissinger in 1973 reproduced in
that segment at time 46:45 - here is what Kissinger repeats in the
style of George Orwell from "1984" ("who controls the
past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past"
), combining the saying of Rothschild from 1800s ("give me
control of a nation's money supply and I care not who makes its
laws") with Thomas Malthus from 1798 ("I do not know that
any writer has supposed that on this earth man will ultimately be
able to live without food. ... Had population and food increased in
the same ratio, it is probable that man might never have emerged from
the savage state."), to come up with the following brilliant
formulation of empirical fact now observable by anyone with even half
a brain functioning:

“Who
controls the food supply controls the people;

who
controls the energy can control whole continents;

who
controls the money can control the world.”

Fools
die many deaths, the valiant die but once --- a lesson unlearned by
the twelve years of obedience training in K-12 that the segment
refers to!!!

Judge
for yourself how much you obey authorities yourself --- to the point
that you take their gospels as religion, especially in medicine where
you follow the AMA, WHO, FDA, blindly.... “Primum non nocere”:
“First, do no harm" has evidently been given a new
Orwellian cover. It is repeated by every physician and surgeon just
like "freedom is slavery" is repeated in Orwell; freedom to
obey the AMA, the WHO, and Authority edicts without question! That
obedience training obviously also includes faithfully echoing who dun
9/11.

The
jury is still out on Foster Gamble as far as I am concerned ---- I
don't know if he is for real or fake opposition. Nothing Gamble has
stated is new. 9/11 would once again be the key litmus test I suppose
[3] --- a test that is by now failed by many among the most lauded in
preeminent dissent. [4] But at least in that medical segment, and in
the Federal Reserve and banking segments that follow, Foster Gamble
using words like "tape-worm" and "parasites" to
refer to the banking cartel, does sound like Eustace Mullins as in
that late scholar's seminal 1984-85 book "The World Order - A
study in the Hegemony of Parasitism", and his 1952 classic: "The
Secrets of the Federal Reserve". It is strange though that while
Foster interviews G. Edward Griffin and features Griffin's book
titled "The Creature from Jekyll Island", Gamble
inexplicably ignores Eustace Mullins' much earlier work which
ostensibly seeded all others including Griffin's narrative. Mullins
was the first one after WW-II to dive deep into the shenanigans
behind the founding of the Federal Reserve by the money trust at
Jekyll Island, under the guidance of the famous political prisoner
Ezra Pound and paid the heaviest price of any living researcher of
the subject. None of the later authors who followed Eustace Mullins,
and almost all of them greatly benefitted from his original research
whether or not they have acknowledged that fact, have paid such a
high price. It is also revealing that virtually all of them,
including G. Edward Griffin the last time I checked, also fail the
9/11 test just like former long-time congressman Ron Paul who also
most carefully likes to challenge the banking cartel but manages to
also echo the establishment's narrative of 9/11, just as Noam Chomsky
does, all of them calling it “blowback” while retaining
the who dunnit narrative of the same establishment they so vigorously
claim to dissent with. The documentary features several speakers who
have precisely held up that Big Lie over the years since 9/11 (as far
as I am aware).

After
all their astuteness displayed in the video to standup to the global
elite on so many diverse matters covered in the documentary, are they
simultaneously so stupid that they cannot add two plus two? In the
anemic coverage of 9/11 in the documentary, Foster Gamble only makes
a passing reference to “false flag operation” with the
statement: “an increasing number of people believe that 9/11
was a false flag operation by the global elite in order to set the
stage for taking over middle east oil and dismantling US
constitutional protection.” (at time 1:31:00). I would have
liked to hear what Foster Gamble himself believed and planted his own
stake in the ground for, and not what other “nut-jobs”
believed! To the extent that this respected scion of the notable
Proctor and Gamble family does not come out as forcefully on 9/11 as
he has demonstrated the courage to come out on the rest of the
matters in the documentary, I would argue that Mr. Gamble is tugging
on the same tenuous safety-line as poisoning his own well by
showcasing UFO con-artists who rehearse their specious and unproven
free energy mantra before an ignorant and unscientific public. And
ultimately, whether wittingly or unwittingly, still contributing to
the sanctification of the Big Lie. [5]

Nevertheless,
I do applaud Foster Gamble, and his wife Kimberly Gamble co hosting
the documentary, for stating many of the verifiable facts as boldly
as they have done. Their distinguished Gamble name standing up to the
tyranny of the banking cartel I imagine will be far more effective
than many others I can think of. Specifically, for the focus of this
introduction, none in the medical profession can really afford to
ignore that segment on medicine in their own good conscience. The
budding doctors in training aspiring to join the world's noblest
profession should be made aware that they are committing to a life on
the elite's chessboard on which they each shall remain pawn in the
hands of the global medical trust, which in turn is controlled by the
global money trust. And that money trust is driving the one-world
government agenda with its attendant policy prescriptions as is
accurately portrayed in the documentary. They may well be
administering the shots for population reduction someday, a topic
only just touched upon by Foster Gamble in the final segments of the
documentary. No one in the medical profession really believes that.
Therefore, well done there, Gambles!

If
I were to edit this documentary to make a more rational cut, I would
be presumptuous enough to cut out all the gibberish in the early
section up to the medical segment starting at minute 42:45, and
selectively incorporate only those portions from the earlier segments
that contain the verifiable facts of the same banking cartel
controlling all aspects of the energy sector and thus having little
natural incentive to entertain any alternatives that can challenge
their monopoly. The editing out of gibberish would of course also
undo the deliberate poisoning of the well, now wouldn't it? Well, why
the hell not? This stellar documentary needs no crutches --- the
topics are well documented in officialdom's own handwritings. I have
studied many of these documents myself. There is no reason for the
spirit of moral courage demonstrated in this documentary by Foster
Gamble and his wife to be contaminated by any frog crapping in the
punch bowl. A clean separation of both science and political science
which factually explains the making of the public mind, from the idle
speculation of “toruses” and the energy mantras drawn
from ancient and New Age religions, will help convince many rational
people of the verifiable facts of the matter who would otherwise not
get past the first ten-twenty minutes of its gibberish, if that!
Which is why I suggest you start watching from that medical segment
onward.

The
rest of the segments in the documentary (except the solution space
and periodic regression into poisoning the well) are simply
excellent, and indeed also mostly verifiable! Every factual topic
covered in the documentary I have had the opportunity to study myself
and I have also written much about these same topics on my own
website. However, the presumption speciously advanced in this
documentary is that scarcity of resources is the first cause of
problems and abundance of free energy would solve it. I do not
believe that the principal problem has anything to do with scarcity
of energy or scarcity of natural resources, and the free energy
mantra is like the Irish gnome --- never quite sure when it might pop
up in your bed.

The
principal problem is PRIMACY. Not SCARCITY!

Primacy
is an imperative as old as hegemony, as old as mankind. No
civilization in the past has escaped its lure. Today, it is directly
manifested in the inequitable distribution of whatever resources and
energies and wealth the world does possess. The documentary even
brings on John Perkins, the infamous Economic Hitman, to confirm how
international primacy works in practice. For its policy
underpinnings, see for instance the text of George F. Kennan's Policy
Planning Study PPS 23 from 1948. That text, we are informed,
fashioned what popularly came to be known as the Truman Doctrine. But
its precepts, as one can see, have continued as the core policy
construct in every US Administration without fail, just as these
precepts remained the cornerstone of every empire in every age before
the rise of latter day Pax Americana in the mid twentieth century:
“We have about 50% of the world's wealth, but only 6.3% of its
population .... In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of
envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise
a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this
position of disparity without positive detriment to our national
security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality
and day-dreaming, and our attention will have to be concentrated
everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive
ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and
world-benefaction .... We should cease to talk about vague and –
for the Far East – unreal objectives such as human rights, the
raising of living standards, and democratization. The day is not far
off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The
less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better.”
[6]

The
ubermensch philosophy which guides the creed and primacy
instincts of the modern parasites is Bernard de Mandeville's, called
the “fable of the bees”. The following veritable
statement made in 1705 AD by the man who it is claimed inspired Adam
Smith's the Wealth of Nations, can always find newer contrivances to
enslave mankind just as easily: “The economic well-being of the
nation depends on the presence of a large number of men who are
content to labor hard all day long. Because men are naturally lazy
they will not work unless forced by necessity to do so.”
Voluntary servitude is part and parcel of the human condition even
when they have every material thing. [7]

The
solution to freedom from tyranny is not in material things; neither
in its abundance, nor in its scarcity. But intellectual and moral
freedom lies in spiritual courage. It is the principal foundation of
all resistance to falsehoods. Thusly, as the noted German philosopher
Goethe had timelessly observed: “None are more hopelessly
enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free”. And
Aldous Huxley demonstrated one fast path to the scientific
implementation of that enslaving ideology in his seminal fable: Brave
New World. Huxley noted on the occasion of the thirtieth anniversary
in a talk given at the University of California, Berkeley: “You
can do everything with bayonets except sit on them! If you are going
to control any population for any length of time you must have some
measure of consent. It's exceedingly difficult to see how pure
terrorism can function indefinitely. It can function for a fairly
long time, but I think sooner or later you have to bring in an
element of persuasion. An element of getting people to consent to
what is happening to them. Well, it seems to me that the nature of
the Ultimate Revolution with which we are now faced is precisely
this: that we are in process of developing a whole series of
techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have
always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people
actually to love their servitude! This is the, it seems to me the
ultimate in malevolent revolution shall we say.” [8]

If
there was an abundance of everything as this simplistic documentary
postulates, and if we had the voluntary self-sustaining libertarian
Austrian systems of Mises as imagined in the final segment, the
global elite will find newer ways to induce deprivation to control
man.

The
instinct for primacy of man upon fellow man is not taken away by its
satiation – for the goal is not satiation, but SOCIAL CONTROL.

The
Pollyanish advocacy in the documentary of Gandhian non-violence as
the primary method of global resistance sounds really great on paper.
It can even make a great undergraduate thesis in social sciences I am
sure. Revealingly though, and unfortunately not mentioned by Foster
Gamble as he rambled on about non-cooperation in the last segment,
that wonderful high-minded principle was most brilliantly adduced
from logic alone by a 22 year old in 16th century France. His name
was Etienne de La Boétie. This young fellow explained
non-cooperation most eloquently in 1552 AD in his treatise to end
voluntary servitude: “The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse
of Voluntary Servitude”. It hasn't happened yet!

If
lofty platitudes could modulate greed and lust for power, then the
Ten Commandments would surely have created heaven on earth by now ---
3000 years and still waiting. Just witness what's happening in
Palestine with the First Commandment – and its harbingers are
the wielders of the same power nexus outlined in the documentary!
What has the spectating world been able to do about interdicting that
cultural and physical genocide of a living people? A big fat ZERO.
The troubling question to me for the concluding segment of this
otherwise brilliant documentary is this: Why present such wishful
platitudes for the solution space which betray little or no
comprehension whatsoever of the diabolical forces of social
engineering and human psychology that are at play worldwide? [9]

Getting
the public mind to live on false hopes after describing the real
problems to them could be construed as a red herring by the skeptic,
but I am trying hard not to be one. Rational analysis of a battle to
be of any benefit must be rooted in reality and empiricism of the
situation, not mysticism, hope, and wishful thinking. As Sun Tzu
noted in the Art of War 2500 years ago, self-delusion isn't a very
productive winning strategy in any battle, the superfluous references
to martial arts and Aikido in the documentary, of using the
opponent's own strengths against him, notwithstanding: “If you
know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a
hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every
victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the
enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” Indeed,
what specific strengths of the ruling oligarchy to deploy against
their primacy in the Aikido match with hoi polloi is not identified
in the documentary.

Foster
Gamble's platitudinous recipe for how to Thrive has made no immediate
impression on me. Any two bit pulpit can sell the same mirage. Deepak
Chopra, also featured in the documentary, does it routinely on
American public television --- and laughs his way to the bank selling
his books. But I am sure it could still be awarded a Ph.D. for New
Age thinking in America's Ivy League. These lofty academies of higher
learning often do craft the most clever doctrines for social
engineering, and for manufacturing the public's consent for untenable
agendas. One such doctrine to fabricate “doctrinal motivation”
for launching “imperial mobilization” I have already
deconstructed at length under the heading “Taking a Deeper Look
into the Dynamics of Mantra Creation: Islamofascism”. [op. cit,
9] That diabolical ingenuity for making the public mind in
preparation for the catastrophic terror of 9/11 was most eruditely
engineered in the 1990s at both Princeton and Harvard – the two
highest ranking Ivy League Universities of the United States. And it
was easily swallowed up by the American and Western public under the
expert guidance of their learned intellectuals as the principal
explanation for 9/11. It cemented the fait accompli of imperial
mobilization --- now backtrack and lament all you want, it does not
and cannot roll back time. The time lost in running on treadmills
living on in feel-good false hopes while bonded in servitude, is also
like that. Time deliberately lost chasing dreamy sounding mirages by
hoi polloi, while hard new realities are irreversibly fashioned on
the ground by history's actors: '“We're an empire now, and when
we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that
reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating
other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things
will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will
be left to just study what we do.”' [op. cit, 9]

The
hard political fact of the matter is that the common man, perpetually
caught between bread and circuses, and perpetually manipulated with
behavior control, cannot take the powers away from the oligarchy with
platitudes of non-violence and non-cooperation --- and that
realization has evidently not sunk in among the well-intentioned,
well-groomed, and well-fed activists of the West. Especially if they
have attended an Ivy League! While they live on in relative comfort
and abundance, they advocate for others to deny cooperation with
power? How will hoi polloi even eat then, or make a living in the
modern world? The stomach tends to come before high mindedness, not
just among the masses but for anyone, including the tallest
intellectual who cannot get two square meals a day. And that is never
understood by the noble revolutionaries who often themselves emerge
from among the elite, and have never suffered for the want of bread.
A French revolution of the hungry only culminates in more tyranny by
hoi polloi upon hoi polloi. It was most ably captured in Charles
Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities. The rise and fall of Napoleonic
history does not contradict that Dicken's fable at all.

What
such platitudinous talk of wishful hope and dreamscape thinking does
perform in practice is the complementary part of social engineering:
it provides the outlet for the pressure cooker to prevent its
bursting. But the same letting off of steam can perhaps someday in
the future, when man has evolved himself spiritually, command an
avalanche of real global resistance. That is the thinking of these
brilliant intellectuals. Human action is non-linear after all, or so
I am told. The butterfly flapping its wings in India can change the
weather in the United States, as some idealists love to advance as
the primary evidence for their wishful thinking. It does sound nice,
appears empowering, even compelling. Perhaps just that faith alone,
of sounding nice, and hopeful, has to be kept alive for the actual
reality of the transition to the epoch when rising spiritualism, a
quest for self-directed search for answers and to make change happen
with considerable personal sacrifice, would start driving global
consciousness. Recorded history, including the legacy of the great
prophets of mankind who brought great moral spiritualism as the
principal antidote for primacy of man against fellow man, does
indicate though that only tyranny has thus far successfully countered
tyranny, not hoi polloi who have only slaved in servitude to every
master. Perhaps we will witness a surprise development at the new
Dawn of the Age of Aquarius – but not in my lifetime. We live
in an epoch when we can't even affect the most obvious first change
that the documentary advocates and which everyone in the world even
actually agrees upon: freedom from debt enslavement to the banksters.
[10]

Man
is today more in chains in the scientific dictatorship of modernity
than ever before in the entire history of mankind. He does not even
know how to grow a grain of bread anymore --- food suddenly removed
from the ubiquitous Safeway supermarket shelves will reduce the
American hoi polloi to rubble in less than a week! To cannibalism in
less than two. And to complete tear down of its advanced society in
less than a month! And that, is the hard reality of the matter at
this moment in our existence. To craft a different future takes a lot
more --- a transformation which is nothing less than a gestalt shift
in the stance against primacy. The fable of the two scorpions held in
a perpetual stalemate in a bottle easily comes to mind for surviving
ubermensch predators in a jungle of depravity and primacy.
[10a] The desire for self-sufficiency at every level, from
individuals to nations, is pragmatically impossible today in the more
advanced and industrialized nations of the Global North. It is still
a practical possibility for the lesser industrialized Global South
however, if we can only learn to eject our house niggers and
uncle toms who rule by proxy for the same enslaving forces of
colonization today in the name of neoliberalism whose
ancestors had previously enslaved entire nations in the name of the
white man's burden. But as the recent event in Pakistan for
instance indicates, just the unilateral demand from WHO for three
nations to vaccinate for polio, and the Pakistani officialdom
immediately declaring that they will prevent anyone leaving her
airports without first forcibly vaccinating them, sums up the twisted
reality of imposed servitude upon the masses. We even witness this
servitude daily at US airports ourselves. I would like to ask Mr.
Foster Gamble how many times he has voluntarily denied permission to
the TSA to have his and his wife's private parts examined either
through X-ray machines or by gloved hands and still traveled to their
destination? Perhaps he flies a private airliner from a private
airport.

The
fundamental first cause of global deprivation and the crises of
inequitable distribution of wealth plaguing mankind being Primacy and
not Paucity, is so painstakingly obvious that it beggars the
imagination how any brilliant mind groomed at Princeton would not
recognize it as such. Why has Foster Gamble so transparently
misdiagnosed the first cause as scarcity of resources instead of
primacy of the oligarchy? It misdirects attention in solving an
entirely different class of problems than the ones which actually
need to be solved first! The systemic disease then continues to lurk
unattended regardless of how many layers of bandages are put on the
patient. This modus operandi of dissent by brilliant savants once
again ties in with poisoning the well idea explored at the
very beginning of this Introduction.

I
challenge the Gambles to stop using that feeble-minded crutch if they
are indeed genuine. I would like to assume that they are --- for I
see no obvious motivation for anyone so well established in the elite
establishment to directly play in what is only bread and butter for
COINTELPRO agents: infiltrate by gaining trust which is done by
affirming what the groups already believe, then misguide, mislead,
make patsies, in order to deflate opposition. In fact, I am excited
that finally someone who is indeed a somebody, is challenging the
real base of power of Western civilization: its hidden in plainsight
oligarchy. Under that presumption, separating personal beliefs and
mysticism from what is factually verifiable to create a rational cut
of this documentary, is the honest intellectual recipe for gaining
traction in the mainstream, in academe, and in effectively countering
the making of the public mind by the social engineers. Point out the
documented facts, analyze and deconstruct the interconnection of its
tentacles so that the public can understand just how deep the rabbit
holes go, and leave out what the public should do about it to their
own organic self realization. It will come organically once they
accurately understand the whole picture of their enslavement and who
participates in it. That will immediately bring the entire world
together on the common understanding of the common problem domain
which equally plagues both the East and the West. Just accomplishing
that much in a single lifetime would be a remarkable achievement for
any individual --- for the solution space is indeed organic and
multi-generational; it cannot be forced with platitudes. It must be
left to the peoples' own creative energies and their situations.

In
conclusion, and more to the point of this Introduction, if you are
studying to become part of the medical profession, or you are a
parent of someone who is, or you are yourself part of that
profession, you need to really think about what you will hear in that
segment. Then go research it yourself. Do you really want to be part
of that banking cartel's control game? How can you avoid it if you
join the medical profession? How can you change it? The professional
practice of medicine, a matter not to be treated as merely an
entertaining philosophical question for gossip in sleep-corners
during nap breaks, is explored further in my little study: What's the
truth about modern medicine? [11] You are invited to better that
study.

Homework:
Begin with trying to answer the fundamental question: Who is AMA (The
American Medical Association) and why must it control and legislate
the practice of medicine of the medical professionals? On what
scientific and technical basis, let alone moral basis, can this
organization claim to know better than the medical practitioners who
have trained for their profession? On what basis whatsoever can this
organization dictate to the professional doctors what is and isn't
“kosher” medicine? The same question must be extended to
WHO (The World Health Organization) – a supra national body
that can declare pandemics at will and dictate what sovereign nations
can and cannot do in their own countries? [12] Whom does this
organization principally work for? [13] Who pays for its “oops”
as was witnessed in the Swine Flu debacle of 2009 in which WHO
forcibly tried to push its ad hoc global vaccination protocol with
the active collaboration of virtually the entire American medical
establishment, the CDC, the many tax-exempt foundations and
think-tanks led by the CFR, and the establishment's mighty superpower
muscle? What if that “oops” is a premeditated genocide of
targeted populations, just as the so called “intelligence
failure” for the premeditated invasion of Iraq was subsequently
dismissed as mere “oops”? As a medical practitioner, how
will you make the call on your better judgment: to follow the AMA,
CDC, and WHO diktats and mandates, or to use your own counsel under
your own professional Hippocratic Oath and refuse that which does not
conform to it?

Addendum

See:
Author John Robbins, Other Progressives Denounce ‘Thrive’,
Santa Cruz local newspaper story by Eric Johnson, April 10, 2012. I
am unimpressed. It is not only consistent with my analysis in the
text above of Foster Gamble gratuitously poisoning the well
and deliberately (or foolishly) making it easy to attack and
discredit his documentary, but backlash is only to be expected when
you take on real power and the public starts paying attention.

Reprint License

All
material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with
full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety,
unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted in perpetuity,
provided the source URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part
of this restricted Reprint License, along with any embedded links within its
main text, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license
violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at
http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. All figures, images,
quotations and excerpts, are used without permission based on
non-profit "fair-use" for personal education and research
use only in the greater public interest, documenting crimes
against humanity, deconstructing current affairs, and scholarly
commentary. The usage by Project Humanbeingsfirst of all external
material is minimally consistent with the understanding of "fair
use" laws at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html.
Project Humanbeingsfirst does not endorse any external website or organization it links to or references, nor those that may link to it or reprint its works.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Laws, you
are provided the material from Project Humanbeingsfirst upon your
request, and taking any action that delivers you any of its documents
in any form is considered making a specific request to receive the
documents for your own personal educational and/or research use. You
are directly responsible for seeking the requisite permissions from
other copyright holders for any use beyond “fair use”.