The defendant is charged [in count __]
with theft of (electric / gas / water / steam / telecommunications / wireless
radio communications / community antenna television) service for profit or
economic gain. The statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as
follows:

a person is guilty of theft of
(electric / gas / water / steam / telecommunications / wireless radio
communications / community antenna television) service for profit or economic
gain when (he/she) without the consent of the supplier of (a/an) (electric / gas
/ water / steam / telecommunications / wireless radio communications / community
antenna television) service and with intent to defraud such supplier, engages in
the business for profit or economic gain of connecting or disconnecting the
meters, pipes, cables, conduits, conductors or attachments of such supplier or
in any other manner tampers or connects with such meters, pipes, cables,
conduits, conductors or attachments.

For you to find the defendant guilty
of this charge, the state must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable
doubt:

Element 1 - Business for profit
or economic gainThe first element is that the
defendant was engaged in a business for profit or economic gain.

In summary, the state must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was engaged in a business for
profit or economic gain, 2) as part of this business, (he/she) (connected /
disconnected) the (meters / pipes / cables / conduits / conductors /
attachments) of the supplier, 3) the supplier did not consent to the defendant's
conduct, and 4) the defendant intended to defraud the supplier.

If you unanimously find that the state
has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements of the crime of theft
of <identify service>, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the
other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not
guilty.