So you admit you have nothing to talk about and yet you continue to talk. That is all we need to know. You have the conclusion: blame Obama, just no facts to lead to the conclusion. No matter just keep up the hate...

PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME HOW BUSH AND THE INCOMPETENT, BRAIN DEAD, WAR MONGERING, REPUBLICANTS COULD BE SO ASLEEP AT THE SWITCH, AS TO ALLOW ONE OF THE MOST LETHAL ATTACKS ON AMERICAN SOIL (IE 9/11)... THEN WE'LL TALK ABOUT BENGHAZI.....KAPEESH!

Because Clinton failed to deal with Bin Laden when he had the chance FOUR TIMES.

In the meantime you are such a tool Obama could be found eating live babies on the front lawn of the White House and you would find an excuse.

Clinton was to blame for the 911 attacks. Of course. Surely you can twist the facts to blame Obama. Try harder: your ideology demands it.

So, let me get this straight; you are in charge of the state dept, a request comes through from a consulate in a hostile country and says "security is inadequate and we need to maintain the strike force" "attacks and up and rebels in area are becomning more heavily armed" and "we feel the local security may be compromised and/or inadequate".

As SoS you never even hear about it??

That's insane and shows a complete failure of protocol within the department!

If, that's true then the policy needs to change immediately on what is communicated!