Blog

The effective altruism movement is allocating hundreds of millions of dollars andmillions of person hours per year to improve the world.Rethink Priorities is a research organization aimed at uncovering actionable insights across different EA causes, improvingthe effectiveness of this time and money.We’re guided by ourfounding values– we care about transparency, tractability, short feedback loops, actionability, and impact assessment.

Rethink Priorities is an independent project of Rethink Charity,founded in January 2018 by Peter Hurford and Marcus A. Davis to figure out how to better allocate our time and money toward doing more good. We recently expanded to a team of ten and have an exciting research agenda for 2019. Our 2019budget is $447K (see table below for details) and we are looking to raise $294K more.If you’re interested in funding Rethink Priorities, or for more information, email Marcus A. Davis (marcus@rtcharity.org).

What we did this year

In 2018, our priority wasour own capacity building and learning about how to do good research. We completed a deep dive intothe cost-effectiveness of vaccines andlearned some lessons about applying cost-effectiveness estimations to domains with high uncertainty. We launched thePriorityWiki (andgot some press) to help summarize existing prioritization research.We also finished a large hiring round, hiring seven researchers and creating our research agenda for 2019.

We also spent some time analyzing movement building strategy in cooperation with other projects of Rethink Charity. Weran the EA Survey and published some of our findings across five posts (e.g.,see this one on donation data) and expect to finish publishing one more post by the end of the year.

Finally, we spent asignificant amount of time doing thorough research into the invertebrate sentience (followingMuehlhauser, 2017, Section 3.2), summarizing the academic literature across 15+ kinds of animals and 40+ potentially conscious indicating features, with publications expected in early 2019.

2019Team

At the start of the year and of the project, the staff of Rethink Priorities consisted only of Peter and Marcus.We made an internal hire with David Moss and then decided to start a hiring round to expand the team to include more researchers. Our current team is:

Marcus A. Davis - Lead Researcher

Marcusworks on Rethink Priorities strategy and oversees research. He previously co-foundedCharity Science Health, where he systematically analyzed global poverty interventions, led cost-effectiveness analyses, and oversaw all technical aspects of the project. Before joining the Charity Science Health team, he ran Effective Altruism Chicago and worked withRethink Charity coordinating outreach to local EA groups around the globe.

Peter Hurford - Lead Researcher

Peterworks on Rethink Priorities strategy and oversees research. He alsois a Data Scientist at DataRobot. He co-founded Rethink Charity, and is on the board of Charity Science Health andAnimal Charity Evaluators. He has reviewed and produced research on cause prioritization and effective altruism since 2013.

David Moss - Senior Research Analyst

David Moss is Director of Research for all of Rethink Charity, focusing on measurement and evaluation. Healso works as a Research Analyst atCharity Entrepreneurship. David studied Philosophy at Cambridge and is an academic researcher of moral psychology.

Kim Cuddington - Research Analyst

Kim Cuddington is a Research Analyst at Rethink Priorities. She has a PhD in ecology with a background in mathematical modeling. She is an academic researcher of population ecologyatthe University of Waterloo.

Derek Foster - Research Analyst

Derek is a Research Analyst at Rethink Priorities. He studied philosophy and politics as an undergraduate, followed by public health and health economics at master’s level. Before joining RP, Derek worked on theGlobal Happiness Policy Report and various other projects related to global health, education, and subjective well-being.

Saulius is a Research Analyst at Rethink Priorities. Previously, he was a research intern atAnimal Charity Evaluators, organised Effective Altruism events in the UK and Lithuania, and worked as a programmer.

Neil Dullaghan - Junior Research Analyst

Neil is a Junior Research Analyst at Rethink Priorities. He also volunteers forCharity Entrepreneurship andAnimal Charity Evaluators. Before joining RP, Neil worked as a data manager for an online voter platform and has an academic background in Political Science.

Jason Schukraft - Junior Research Analyst

Jason is a Junior Research Analyst at Rethink Priorities. Before joining the RP team, Jason earned his doctorate in philosophy from the University of Texas at Austin. Jason specializes in questions at the intersection of epistemology and applied ethics.

Daniela R. Waldhorn - Junior Research Analyst

Daniela is a Junior Research Analyst at Rethink Priorities. She is a PhD candidate in Social Psychology, and has a background in management and operations. Before joining RP, Daniela worked forAnimal Ethicsand forAnimal Equality.

2019 Research Agenda

With our team, we arewell positioned for 2019to produce substantial amount ofhigh-quality research on a number of topics.

We intend to continue our focus on farmed and wild animal welfare for 2019, as we still see animal welfare as an important, neglected, and uniquely tractable issue that our team is well-poised to address.However, in 2019, we’d also like to allocate some amount of time to working outside animal welfare, such as improving mental health,strengthening the effective altruism movement, reducing catastrophic risks to the survival of humanity (e.g., nuclear weapons, bio-terror, artificial intelligence), and improving the quality of the long-term future.

Projects we may take on in 2019 potentially include:

Analysis of the impact of ballot initiatives for animal welfare- Ballot initiatives to improve animal welfare have racked up recent wins, such asMassachusetts’s Question 3 (2016) andCalifornia’s Proposition 12 (2018), as well asCalifornia’s Proposition 2 (2008). We’re going to explore the cost-effectiveness of these results both qualitatively and with quantitative econometric models.We’ll these models to identify the most promising future opportunities, which could help identify good funding opportunities for the 2020 election.

Analysis of the impact of corporate campaigns in animal welfare- Corporate campaigning is one of the most well-funded and well-regarded animal welfare interventions currently pursued by the effectiveness-oriented animal welfare advocacy community. We’ll analyze the cost-effectiveness of corporate campaigningin more depth as well as understand potential failure modes and how to combat them.

Identifying ways to improve wild animal welfare- Wild animal welfare seems very important, as there are vastly many animals in the wild and their lives plausibly contain a lot of suffering. Wild animal lives are also transformed by humans every day with little regard to their welfare. We intend to learn more about what wild animal lives are like and what interventions could help improve their welfare.We plan to use focus groups and surveys to better understand how the public thinks about wild animals.

Doing surveys and polling- We think better understanding public attitudes could be key to identifying and understanding effective behavioral or policy change.We plan to run multiple surveys, such as analyzing reasons people become vegetarian to better understand the potential for individual diet change, understanding public interest (if any) in banning slaughterhouses (following upSentience Institute (2017)). We’d also run polls to identify popular, cost-effective policies that could potentially be implemented via ballot measures or lobbying governments (we’ve identified a pollster who may collaborate with us quite inexpensively). Lastly, we’d like to understand how EAs think about ethics, collaborating with EA Foundationon theirdescriptive ethics research.

Understanding EA movement growth- We’d like to run the EA Survey again in 2019. We also will continue collaborating with the Local Effective Altruism Network, a fellow project of Rethink Charity, in understanding the effectiveness of current movement building initiatives and what makes movement building initiatives more successful.

Understanding mental health interventions- We’d like to understand if we can rely on$/DALY or $/QALY metrics to capture mental health benefits or, if not, if there is a better cost-effectiveness metric that better captures mental health benefits. Once we have a good framework for prioritizing mental health, we’d like to see if we can identify any mental health opportunities that are competitive with other EA opportunities.

Analysis ofcatastrophicriskreduction- We’d like to start learning how to do work in these areas. We’re intending to start with shallow reviews onorganizations dedicated to nuclear de-proliferation. We’d also like to see if we can apply insurance risk forecastingtechniquesto inform estimates of catastrophic risk.

While this list is not meant to be a definitive look at which projects we will actually complete in 2019, it represents our broad priorities. As such, our work will span multiple domains, but we intend to focus the majority of our time on animal welfare.

2019Goals and Measuring Progress

We see our primary means of impact as influencing and informing the effective altruism movement. Our 2019 goal is to establish ourselves as an effective altruism research organization with a path toward influencing key donors and decision-makers, especially in the animal advocacy space. While the hope is that research we do may uncover important interventions that could absorb millions of dollars in funding, we’d like to start in 2019 simply by ensuring that at least four people or institutions grantingat least $50,000 in 2019 each cite our research as a factor in their decision-making. We alsointend to annually run a formal survey to discover if our target audience of large-scale donors has read our work and if it has influenced their decision-making.

Fundraising

Fungibility

While we are a project ofRethink Charity, we maintain an entirely separate budget and fundraise separately. All funding specifically earmarked to Rethink Priorities will be used for Rethink Priorities research only and will notbe used for other Rethink Charity projects.

Furthermore, we’re able to accept funding earmarked to a particular project area (for example, if you only want to fund work into wild animal welfare).We’ve done careful accounting to create budgets for each project and to minimize risk of fungibility between projects. However, unrestricted funding would be most valuable to us to allow us to pursue our highest priority research agendas or change our research plans if we find more important projects.

Conclusion

We’re excited by our new team and our ambitious research agenda for 2019. To fund this, we’re looking to raise $294K and we hope that you will consider supporting us. Cause prioritization research is valuable and widely neglected. Rethink Priorities is uniquely-placed to make a tractable impact on difficult problems.