April 30, 2014

Our competitors in theoretical physics keep pushing the nonsense of the “Big Bang” some “13.7 billion years ago.” Mature galaxies cannot form in a few billion years; it’s a much more gradual process. Therefore the observations given in the link disprove the “Big Bang.”

April 24, 2014

The conventional theorists are jumping to conclusions, as they always do. In the Reciprocal System, all radiation from upper range speeds (> c) is polarized (see p. 224 of Larson’s The Universe of Motion), and since the CMBR comes from the cosmic sector, it comes from cosmic matter moving at upper range speeds (from our perspective). Therefore, it must be polarized. No “gravitational waves” are involved!

The Reciprocal System has always posited discrete space-time, Relativity has not. Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity contradict each other, so one or both of them must be wrong. The length of unit space is not “Planck space” but rather 4.558816 x 10^(-6) cm.

April 16, 2014

Again, more nonsense from conventional physics. Neutral particles are necessary to explain conduction in solar cells, etc., but the true identity of these particles is: massless, chargeless electrons, not a hypothetical combination of a charged electron and a “hole.”

The conventional theorists are puzzled: “no known process can account for this.” That’s because they are using false theories. Gamma rays result from atomic transformations; obviously, some of the atoms in the Galactic center have reached the “age limit” for matter and are self-destructing. On Earth, where pressures and temperatures are much lower, this process would result in radioactivity; in the Galactic center, the pressures and temperatures are so high that “relieving” the situation cannot be done through radioactivity; the excess mass must self-destruct to gamma rays.