Measuring Bias against Female Political Leadership

Much research examining gender bias in politics analyzes responses to explicit survey questions asking individuals whether they prefer male over female leaders or agree that male political leaders are superior. Drawing insights from the measurement of other types of prejudice, this article explores the methodological shortcomings of a widely used question of this type. Analyzing the results of two surveys—one national and one state-level—I compare response patterns to a standard, highly explicit question that is frequently administered by the Pew Research Center with those for a modestly altered item that employs multiple strategies to reduce social desirability bias. Compared with the alternative measure, the conventional item seriously underreports prejudice against women leaders. Moreover, the underreporting of bias is especially prevalent among individuals belonging to groups that are strong advocates of gender equality.

The author gratefully acknowledges the many insights provided by Alixandra B. Yanus and Jeff Seward. Martin J. Kifer and High Point University's Survey Research Center provided critical support to the project by fielding survey questions on my behalf. Data and replication syntax will be provided upon request.

Footnotes

The author gratefully acknowledges the many insights provided by Alixandra B. Yanus and Jeff Seward. Martin J. Kifer and High Point University's Survey Research Center provided critical support to the project by fielding survey questions on my behalf. Data and replication syntax will be provided upon request.

Brint, Steven, and Abrutyn, Seth. 2010. “Who's Right about the Right? Comparing Competing Explanations of the Link between White Evangelicals and Conservative Politics in the United States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion49 (2): 328–50.