Thanks guys,I tried all of your suggestions and, although it went from nothing to very good, it still needs work.Since I don't know the interface, it's hard for me to fine-tune the Zenith to perfection.

What I did, was to save the project as a template and applied it to a new project with the same images. Then I repeated the whole process, but it didn't seem to improve it.

I'm attaching a screen capture of the pano, and of one of the problem areas.How can I improve the stitching?

jarane wrote:Thanks guys,I tried all of your suggestions and, although it went from nothing to very good, it still needs work.Since I don't know the interface, it's hard for me to fine-tune the Zenith to perfection.

What I did, was to save the project as a template and applied it to a new project with the same images. Then I repeated the whole process, but it didn't seem to improve it.

I'm attaching a screen capture of the pano, and of one of the problem areas.How can I improve the stitching?

Also, is there any way to improve the RMS of the Control Points?

@ Klaus: do you also shoot 6 x -15º plus Zenith at 90º?

Thanks again,E.C.

A lot of relatively featureless space.

The type of scene that may cause APG's auto control detection problems.

Yes,I followed Alexandre's suggestion and applied all the steps of the linked tutorial to my images.The files generated by the D800 have a ton of information, and you can easily see creases, holes and every stain on the white walls (unfortunately so, hehe).

When trying to generate CPs to the problem areas, I realized that their RMS was getting increasingly higher. There must be a way to optimize those CPs to make them usable.Do you know if it's possible?

jarane wrote:When trying to generate CPs to the problem areas, I realized that their RMS was getting increasingly higher. There must be a way to optimize those CPs to make them usable.Do you know if it's possible?