Recent amendments to the Undergraduate Students Association Council Election Code could level the playing field for candidates running in this year’s undergraduate student government election, student leaders said.

USAC unanimously passed a series of amendments to the election code last month, including reimbursing candidates’ campaign spending with 10 percent of the election board’s total budget and limiting campaign spending for all candidates to $600. Ten percent of the board’s current budget, or $3,750, will be split evenly among candidates who report their campaigning expenses, said Jayesh Menon, the election board’s finance committee director.

Menon said candidates must report how much they spend on their campaign and where they spent their money. Candidates will be reimbursed for their expenditures if the board determines their spending was valid.

“I proposed a reimbursement scheme in the first place because I was vocal about (electing candidates) who could represent students rather than candidates who could readily acquire funding,” he said.

Election board Chair Jack Price said he was also inspired to use student fees to partially reimburse the elections because he supports publicly funded elections at the federal level.

“As a board, we decided that money should not control elections and it should be about the voices of students,” he said. “But we wanted to make sure that the money that is used to amplify these voices is coming from the students as much as possible.”

Menon added he thinks money can be a barrier to some students interested in running and candidates with more funds are at an advantage.

“If you have enough funds you can really advertise for yourself and your platforms,” he said. “So we thought doing this would be an incentive for students (without a lot of funds) to join the election and run for candidacy.”

Price said he thinks the increase in students who attended this year’s candidate orientation is a sign that the election code changes have given more students an incentive to run for office. This year, 45 candidates attended the orientation, while 22 candidates attended last year.

“As far as I know, it is unprecedented,” he said.

For example, if 39 candidates were to run, they would be eligible to be reimbursed about $95 each.

Price added he thinks candidates will be incentivized to spend less in the election because they will only be reimbursed for a fraction of their spending.

The election board decided to use $600 as the uniform campaign spending limit because that was the median spending amount over the last couple of years, Price said.

“We chose to peg our spending limit to that and a little under because we want to encourage thrift,” he said.

Last year, students running for executive positions had a spending limit of about $900 while students running for nonexecutive positions had a spending limit of about $700. Slates also had their own spending limits, able to spend up to $200 per person.

“It sends a message that one race matters more than another, when all hold an equal seat at the table and are all equally important,” Menon said.

Divya Sharma, USAC academic affairs commissioner, said he thinks the election code changes address some of the funding problems he experienced while running independently last year.

“It was hard because you don’t have that huge amount of money that a slate would have when you’re running independently,” he said. “It wasn’t an issue staying within a budget, it was an issue when slates had more money.”

Poll

The Undergraduate Students Association Council urged a Student Media newsmagazine member earlier this month to turn off its livestream during part of the the public comment period of its meeting. USAC's livestream policies do not allow for audio or video for a segment of its public comment periods, so as to protect the identity of students, but there are currently no regulations in place for Student Media livestreaming of council meetings. What do you think about this?
The student government should be able to restrict the public from recording its meetings, as it has the right to protect the identities of students who may face safety issues for what they say.
USAC meetings are a public forum and student journalists should be able to livestream to make this information accessible to the public.
The debate over livestreaming in USAC meetings is irrelevant, as few students watch livestreams of undergraduate student government meetings.
I have feelings about this issue that are not expressed in the options above.
Submit View results without voting »

Santa Monica Family looking for part time afternoon/evening child care for 5 yo and 3 yo. We need help driving kids to activities and playdates. Reliable car and driving record a must. Someone who can help with keeping house organized and running errands a bonus. This job would be 30 hrs per week-somewhat flexible with hours but we are looking for someone interested in a consistent job. Job to commence End of January/Beginning Feb..
[email protected]
• child care wanted

GINA RODRIGUEZ ON UCLA CAMPUS DECEMBER 13TH
Gina Rodriguez and Ford Motor Company present a discussion on breaking the glass ceiling at the Northwest Auditorium at UCLA on December 13th.
Actress, director, activist
Gina Rodriguez along with Sheryl Connelly, Futurist at Ford Motor Company, Gillian Zucker,
President of Business Operations at the LA Clippers and other top
female executives will discuss their own challenges and
victories in breaking through to the top of their professions. The panel will share their collective insights and helpful tools on
successfully navigating obstacles and opportunities facing women and underrepresented groups. The discussion will be followed by a short Q&A with the audience.
Doors: 3pm
Reception / Refreshments
Event Time: 4pm- 5:30pm
(please be seated by 3:50pm)
reserve a spot
[email protected] • Greeks