I can't believe the names are even said in the same sentence.
Let's see, a true reformer who ended the cold war or pervert accused of rape and sex in the oval office. One was impeached and one wasn't.
Don't ever say Clinton balanced the budget. Congress balanced the budget. If you give ANYONE credit, it was Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich who made it happen.
The only thing Clinton did was sign the bill instead of vetoing it. (Obama would veto it)

Politics is measured in a circle, not a line. Extreme facisim and extreme Communism are basically the same thing. That's why the extreme left and right will forever argue - because both sides are right: Neither 100% left nor 100% right is the correct solution. We should stay in the center - a bit from the left and a bit from the right - if we ever want to do a country good.

After all, does a country not need both a strong leadership (brought from the right) and a strong population of citizens (brought for the left)?

I say Clinton only because of Economic status at the end of his terms. Ronald Regan was integral in bring down the wounded and angry USSR and saving us from the economic Landslide that was Carter. Carter was a humanitarian not a President. To resppond to Mr. NeoHebrew, Obama has supported the Jewish people just as passionately and just as ferverantly as any other president. The Democrats dont want to kill the jewish people, I mean half of the Democrats are the Jewish people. Youre thinking of the anti Isreal Super Libratarians that are usually more Right of center than left.

That surplus was created by Newt Gingrich. Clinton did not want to sign that budget bill, but he did because both Houses were GOP. Here is an article by the bipartisan CATO Institute. It's part of history so READ IT. Educate yourself. You're just parroting propaganda spoonfed to you by the media.

This is HISTORYGingrich had far more to do with it than CLINTON. (Kind of like Pelosi had more to do with Obamacare than Obama).The CATO Institute is bipartisan, btw....This is a GREAT article. Every American should read it because it is part of history.

The american worker saw an improvement in his or her way of life during 1990s. Reaganomics may have worked in theory.. But was never truly implemented.. Not in the way he explained it. In some aspects it failed. Compare the political records between the two. Then answer the question for yourself. Its close but I will choose Clinton.

That surplus was created by Newt Gingrich. Clinton did not want to sign that budget bill, but he did because both Houses were GOP. Here is an article by the bipartisan CATO Institute. It's part of history so READ IT. Educate yourself. You're just parroting propaganda spoonfed to you by the media.

This is HISTORYGingrich had far more to do with it than CLINTON. (Kind of like Pelosi had more to do with Obamacare than Obama).The CATO Institute is bipartisan, btw....This is a GREAT article. Every American should read it because it is part of history.

I was proud to serve this country as a Soldier in the US Army under President Ronald Reagan's term of service. Clinton however showed us how to be ashamed of our Commander in Chief. Just like obama,,,,,

We are still being destroyed economically by the policies put in place at the end of Clintons term. Communist China is becomiing the Worlds SuperPower due to China being able to replace the U.S. as the worlds mfg. leader at the expense of America's Mfg. Base. Reagan would never have allowed trade agreements with any Communist Nation. The greatest enemy of the free world, which has allowed for the problems We are currently facing..

I agree.. We are suffering from the policies that were left behind from the Clinton era. But let's not fool ourselves and disregard the fact the Reagan raised taxes 11 times in his presidency.. Jobs were not easy to find during that time.. I was young man and looking for work and found it very difficult. Under the Clinton administration did we or did we not see an economic improvement from the 1980s? I believe we all did. Say what u want.. But Ronald Reagan destroyed the strength of the unions in america by busting the Air traffic controllers strike and forcing them back to work. The private sector american union worker has suffered ever since.

I can’t recall this country ever being in the fiscal condition it is now; whether it was Reagan or Clinton, and neither can any of you Clinton/Reagan haters on this site. Reagan was instrumental in bringing down the communist threat to the western world, Clinton signed welfare reform, what’s the beef? I rightfully don’t give a crap about Iran-Contra or Clinton-Lewinski; get over it folks! The world is on fire, and the “peace loving” left is head strung on support for a return to Auschwitz; it would give them pleasure to gas every Jew (for sake of Palestinians, whoever they are, and for what?), they can find, as they destroy our American way of life. The right wants to stop them in their tracks, then with impugnity,get beat over the head for doing so, and the American-Idol idiot public sits back, fiddles, changes the channel, then looks for another means of getting a quick thrill. No wonder Obummer got elected and this country is in the sorry state it is. Reagan would never have allowed this country get to where it is today, no matter what you left wing, wigged out numbskulls think. I'm waiting for the standard-brand wave of insults, so here's my answer, $crew You!

It depends really on whether you were in the top 5% or if you were in the middle class. (Sound familiar?) Reagan is the President who began the "Great Divide" betwixt the Upper, corporate and Middle Classes. While there are many from the Right who look on Reagan's presidency with great nostalgia and many republican leaders want to emulate him, (the Tea Party Governor of Wis. for one), Reagan will never be looked on as a "Great President" by historians.

Reagan is already deemed the best modern president by historians. What are you talking about?

You're uninformed and obviously get news from MSNBC.Do you want to pay higher taxes?Do you believe in the Constitution?If you say 'yes' to both questions, you qualify as a Tea Partier.Do a little research before you make comments.Actually, our country is circling the drain now. If things don't get back on track very soon,the country we love will become unrecognizable. It practically is already.

Putting aside your incredibly offensive insult, the reason why I would never choose Reagan is because it was during his tenure that the assault against the Middle Class began. He had two recessions and he raised taxes on the middle class SEVEN times....all to pay for the tax breaks he gave to the wealthy.

So take your insults and your disrespect and go put them where the sun doesn't shine.

Seriously? Liberals are the party of name calling. I'm surprised you haven't called us racists yet.Do you have a daughter? How would you like if your daughter worked for the president and he took advantage of her awe of him?What Clinton did with Monica Lewinsky is an embarrassment to the office.Every time a liberal calls Clinton "a good man", they say that sexual harassment is A-OK. After Lewinsky came out, we all know ALL the other accusations were true.Then he LIED to the American people over and over until the stained dress came out.

Personally, I liked it better when the presidency was above all that scummy crap.I would like to have a dignified man in the WH again.I'm sure you love Obama too and that man has ruined the country.We're hanging on by a thread.Do some of your own research.Make up your OWN mind.Stop listening to propaganda.Right now, America is rated #48 in a list of "Free Press" in the world. The whole world knows our media lies to us for the government - except people who don't do their own research. (People like you)

I USED to think I was a liberal until I started doing my own research.I'm a Conservative who leans Libertarian.The Democratic party has become Socialist. Just a fact, honey.(And Socialism is Communism's ugly, little sister)