Before you leave a message on my talk page, please read the following Rules of engagement:

I'm happy to receive your suggestions or comments, if they consist of more than three words and follow the essentials of Orthography.

I left a comment on your talk page?. Please answer on your page underneath.

Conversations that started on this page will be continued here. This means, if you write something on this page, I will answer here. If necessary, add this page to you watchlist. Wiki-Mails will generally be answered on the writers talk page for reasons of privacy.

If your comment refers to one of my edits, a difflink will help me understand.

Could you explain why you marked this : File:Cefaly-migraine.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. ? This file is ours and we share it with a Creative Commons. do you think i need to adapt the CC conditions for this file ?

pretty easily explained: Did you personally press the button of the camera? Most likely you did not. The person who took the picture is unsually the rightful owner of the picture. You (or your company) may have a permission to use this picture. However, did the owner agree that you share the picture unter a free license? As a consequence, everybody in the world may use this picture for free (even commercially), i.e. there will be no further royalties for the photographer. Did you consider this? In order to use the pic on Commons, you need to declare that you own the right to allow a free use of this picture, see COM:OTRS for further details. Regards, -- Wo st 01(talk / cont) 16:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Well… next time it will be better to first ask explaination and avoid the speed deletion mark !
Because, now the file is already gone. We actually have the complete rights on this picture. It's a picture destined to a broadband diffusion. So yes we can choose to distribute a low res version for free use on Wikipedia. It is up to us to decide what we can do with it. We didn't knew the way to declare the rights. I will take a look later.
Did you consider this before putting speed deletion mark on it ?
--Ost (talk) 10:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I did consider this, knowing a deletion can be reversed. But thsi is the wrong question: Did you consider reading about how to license images before uploading the picture? -- Wo st 01(talk / cont) 10:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanck you for your answer
Ok, I read about how to license images. But as I told, I'm not sure to be entirely consistent on that matter. I need to find out and to discuss or take advice on this point. And i need the time to do so ... The deletion was immediate (less than 24h), I have not even had time to check and take corrective action. It was under a Creative Commons licence and we own the rights on the original picture. The picture was in place since January 2011 with no problem. I followed the same procedure as for my own contributions, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ov-beaune-hotel-dieu.jpg
It is not the only bad question, if you like the right question ! Another good question is why no one give us time to complete a constructive discussion on the file's page before the immediate deletion ?
--Ost (talk) 11:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:United Flight 811 view from inside hole.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:United Flight 811 view from inside hole.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hi Wo st 01 -- so the question here is: if this photo was taken by an NTSB employee (and I think there is an excellent chance that it was) what is the actual source of the image? Where did the NTSB publish it? Rlandmann (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Rlandmann

I was pretty sure, it was mentioned in the NTSB accident report (PDF). However, I cannot find it. The pic is also used on aviation-safety.net and credited to the NTSB accordingly. I wlill try again tomorrow... -- Wo st 01(talk / cont) 21:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! The photo is very familiar to me, and I was also sure it was in the report (actually, I checked both versions before I tagged the image), but no luck. The problem is, that aviation-safety.net isn't the NTSB, so we still have no proof that this is an NTSB image (although, like I say, I feel certain that it is. But my feelings aren't proof either!) --10:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

I also found the pic on http://avherald.com/h?article=40a29b54. Aviation Herald also credits NTSB as source of the picture. For me, this makes it very plausible the picture originates from ther NTSB. -- Wo st 01(talk / cont) 20:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Wo st 01, I saw you requested images in Category:Hellenbach Tunnel to rename "Hellenberg" to "Hellenbach", but I believe this is incorrect. The Wikipedia articles ([[:nl: Hellenbergtunnel|nl]], de) are speaking about the Hellenbergtunnel insted of the Hellenbachtunnel. Also Google doesn't have any records about Hellenbachtunnel. Could you explain this, please? Thanks, JurgenNL (talk) 08:54, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I assumed the cat was correct. In fact, the cat should then be renamed or moved accordingly. Thanks. -- Wo st 01(talk / cont) 08:57, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. I will take care of it. JurgenNL (talk) 09:20, 6 October 2014 (UTC)