I'm not "looking negatively" cause i'm gonna lose as you say, for the simple reason that i'm not playing seriously lol ... don't have time ^^I said what i thought, if ARM did this, my opinion would be the same.Doesn't matter if it's ARM or RUN, i just pointed out the "strategy" (hard even to call it so) that was used, and told my opinion about it.

Like I said before, most admin decisions are knee jerk reactions. One team starts *CENSORED* and whining they will go ban people just to satisfy a few people. I did say, just because you are NOT banned, doesnt make you right, and just because you are banned doesnt make you wrong.

I've banned the colony in question and the "sponsoring" colony that traded them the tokens. This kind of extreme situation is bannable even if there is no multi situation as it is circumventing the normal game mechanics/system by creating a colony for the sole purpose to strike at an opponent's weakspot.-Andrew

I've banned the colony in question and the "sponsoring" colony that traded them the tokens. This kind of extreme situation is bannable even if there is no multi situation as it is circumventing the normal game mechanics/system by creating a colony for the sole purpose to strike at an opponent's weakspot.-Andrew

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum