trappedspirit:Far Cough: trappedspirit: Far Cough: Can we all just agree that the structure of male genitalia is completely ridiculous? If any argument were needed against a "designer", the floppy vulnerable cockanbalz are Exhibit A.

Because if there were a designer we would all be invulnerable armored mecha with perfect exoskeletons and capable of running 100 mph for 2 days straight.

Right, like roaches.

/big ones are unpleasant to squish

I thought you were arguing that vulnerabilities proved no designer? Does that mean we would have to be invulnerable for you to buy that designer business?

What? There's no designer because there's exactly zero evidence of one and zero need for one to explain anything. "Because magic" is the refuge of morons. Dicks are just funny icing on the cake.

WeenerGord:FunkOut: utah dude: no, you were never a woman. genetics does not work that way. in fact, women are missing missing something. kthnx for playing.

Women are missing a Y chromosome. Men are missing a second copy of the X chromosome that gives back up copies of genes in case the first X is corrupted, which causes a higher rate of death for embryos in males.

Men are missing one leg off an X chromosome. When this X is corrupted in this way, a male is born.

First, there is an evolutionary explanation that says that hair loss has developed as a signal to other men that you're past your sexual prime and that you shouldn't be a target of aggression.

The problem with this logic is that the children spawned by older fathers actually live longer (something to do with telomeres), so wouldn't farking an older man be an evolutionary advantage to women, having sons that live and fark longer, and have more time to spread their genes around?