I'll be the FIRST to say I can't stand when people say EVERYTHING is a conspiracy b4 doing any sort of research...but peep..

Have you listened to the official police scanners from the local police that day? not trying to throw anything on you but it went a little like this...

- Police got a call from the school reporting someone is inside of the school shooting..ok..they say the police got on the scene less than 3 mins AFTER the call..an officer is still on the phone with the caller (not sure if the same who made the first one) but she claims she sees two shadows running near tha school gym (I have no idea where it is located)..the officer says he sees the "shadows/guys" running...he catches one (so he says)..and says he has him "proned down to the ground"..there's a video interview of the little kid saying he saw a man "pinned down" on the ground by police..there's a helicopter video of officers chasing another guy in the woods (2 different people)..the guy in the woods is wearing the same thing the caller said the shooter was wearing (no idea how he/she saw the shooter without being shot )..and bring the guy out the woods...there's another video interview with a man saying the police just came out the woods with the guy (the guy from the woods is telling the parents he "didn't do it")..the reporter asks the guy what was the dude from the woods wearing..and he says "camo pants with a black jacket"...also on the police scanner's audio...an officer says multiple weapons found.."a shotgun and a rifle" (tbh..can't remember if he mentioned the 2 handguns they say were found near the dead *shooter*)..

Like I said..just take the info however you want...fu*ked up situation all over..couldn't imagine that sh*t happening to someone I actually knew..smhh..

I was watching that sh*t live on Friday..and they k!lled that story of a 2nd shooter (guy in the woods)..after 15mins of saying they believe they found a 2nd shooter in the woods...it was said they believe he had nothing to do with it.....but they never ever said anything about who he was...why was he in the woods...why wasn't he taken to headquarters anyway..especially since he had on the SAME exact clothing as the *described shooter*...innocent or not..something doesn't add up with that entire story....

then they claimed they didn't find the rifle in the school...only da 2 handguns...they say they found the rifle in the trunk of his mother's car.....well...if he went in there and shot 20+ people (killing them @ that)....went BACK outside..and put the rifle in the trunk...went BACK inside..then took his own life ....wtf...w/e...fu*ked up sh*t all over....

You do realize you just described callers calling in reporting a shooting with no detail of the shooter. When the cops came, the detained everybody in the area because the shooter was not identified. It's called securing the perimeter. It's simple logic. If you hear gun shots, people are going to run. It's no surprise there would be reports of "shadows" running after hearing gunfire.

Again though all these conspiracies and views are because they never show VIDEO FOOTAGE

of the initial entrance of these mass k!llings, all they have to do is show the footage just like

Columbine and people wouldn't be creating conspiracies, no need to we get to see the actual event.

What ever happened to logic? That video doesn't describe a second shooter. It describes someone getting detained. The witness never said shooter. Only you nutjobs would automatically jump to the conclusions that a person being detained meant he was the shooter. Let's play the logic game for a second. Police get multiple calls reporting gunfire at an elementary school but no description of the shooter. Do they A) secure the perimeter and detain everyone in the area until hey can figure things out or B) Arrest the shooter who they have no description of?

People with a brain knows the police would secure the perimeter and arrest anything that moves inside that radius while sending in a squad inside the school to combat if the shooter was still there. All you nutjobs think the police are magically going to arrest only the shooter in a chaotic situation without knowing how he/she looks.

You do realize you just described callers calling in reporting a shooting with no detail of the shooter. When the cops came, the detained everybody in the area because the shooter was not identified. It's called securing the perimeter. It's simple logic. If you hear gun shots, people are going to run. It's no surprise there would be reports of "shadows" running after hearing gunfire.

You people are over thinking this.

when the cops came the shooting was over...so yea..they have to clear tha scene and make sure the gunmen are gone/dead/disarmed..and detain everyone because you don't know who the shooter is....but are you going to run from the school allll the way into the woods...and you're running from the police...you come out the woods and the first thing you say as you're walkin' by the parents is "you didn't do it......."...what is it you "didn't do" ?

yes..I agree with ur logic...anyone with common sense will run from the shooting..but when you don't hear anymore shots and you hear sirens from police cars are you going to take off running into the woods trying to get away from the police?

when the cops came the shooting was over...so yea..they have to clear tha scene and make sure the gunmen are gone/dead/disarmed..and detain everyone because you don't know who the shooter is....but are you going to run from the school allll the way into the woods...and you're running from the police...you come out the woods and the first thing you say as you're walkin' by the parents is "you didn't do it......."...what is it you "didn't do" ?

yes..I agree with ur logic...anyone with common sense will run from the shooting..but when you don't hear anymore shots and you hear sirens from police cars are you going to take off running into the woods trying to get away from the police?

If you hear shots, you're probably not going to stop running until you're home. Nobody said the guy in the woods was running. You are jumping to that conclusion. The only thing I said is reports of people running, like the person who said he saw two shadows runnings near the gym are to be expected. A shadow doesn't equate to a person in the woods with camo pants on. They're probably not the same people.

All we know is that guy was led out of the woods by police. Maybe he was cutting firewood when the shooting first happened. Maybe he was in the parking lot, heard shots and ran into the woods. We don't know. Obviously whatever he was doing, he was determined to not be involved. But since he was detained, he automatically was a shooter, right?

technically his tweet may hold a lot of truth to it... in reality the government did wait all this time for a terrible event like this to happen!! why was the a.ssault weapons ban discontinued in 2004??? 3 years earlier we were "apparently" attacked by the Taliban who signature weapon is an a.ssault rifle!!!

i think that is what he is trying to say but he is too fu*ked up to explain simple things in detail

If you hear shots, you're probably not going to stop running until you're home. Nobody said the guy in the woods was running. You are jumping to that conclusion. The only thing I said is reports of people running, like the person who said he saw two shadows runnings near the gym are to be expected. A shadow doesn't equate to a person in the woods with camo pants on. They're probably not the same people.

All we know is that guy was led out of the woods by police. Maybe he was cutting firewood when the shooting first happened. Maybe he was in the parking lot, heard shots and ran into the woods. We don't know. Obviously whatever he was doing, he was determined to not be involved. But since he was detained, he automatically was a shooter, right?

technically his tweet may hold a lot of truth to it... in reality the government did wait all this time for a terrible event like this to happen!! why wasnt the a.ssault weapons ban discontinued in 2004??? 3 years earlier we were "apparently" attacked by the Taliban who signature weapon is an a.ssault rifle!!!

i think that is what he is trying to say but he is too fu*ked up to explain simple things in detail

The a.ssault weapons ban was discontinued in 2004 because Clinton only signed a ban for 10 years back in 1994. Bills were introduced in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, and 2009 to reinstate the ban but never passed. It's called lobbying by the NRA.