{% include "includes/auth/janrain/signIn_traditional.html" with message='It looks like you are already verified. If you still have trouble signing in, you probably need a new confirmation link email.' %}

Ninth Circuit deals another legal setback to Trump travel and refugee order

Another federal appeals court has delivered a legal defeat to the White House on President Trump’s revised travel and refugee order, as the Ninth Circuit on Monday refused to fully lift an injunction that has kept Mr. Trump’s plans on hold to bar the arrival of visitors and refugees from six majority-Muslim nations.

The decision by a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit came as the U.S. Supreme Court was accepting legal briefs on a similar, but different case from the Fourth Circuit, where the Trump Administration had also lost in court on the revised travel and refugee plan.

In this latest ruling, the Ninth Circuit said the President violated immigration law by not showing how the entry of people from Iran, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Syria and Yemen would harm American interests.

Today’s ruling upheld a decision in March by a federal judge in Hawaii, who put much of the revised Trump travel and refugee order on hold.

The Ninth Circuit decision also cited a recent tweet from President Trump, in which he called his order as a “travel ban” – as the three judge panel used a footnote to refer to comments from White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, that Mr. Trump’s tweets are considered “official” statements.

Asked about today’s ruling, Spicer said the Justice Department was reviewing its options.

“We continue to be confident that the President’s executive order to protect this country is fully lawful and will ultimately be upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court,” Spicer told reporters.

“Any lawyer worth their salt agrees 100 percent the President was within his rights,” Spicer added.

View Comments
0

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. Sign in or register.