Joined:Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:47 pmPosts:155Location: United States of America

I think Ay did, but it's suspicious that Horemheb made his lifelong goal to erase all records of Tutankhamen .

I also definitely don't think that Ankhesenamun did because why would she, really? She seemed like such a loving wife AND she knew that she probably would be forced into marrying someone old like Ay. The only reason ppl think she's a major suspect is because she was with Tut all the time, and therefore would have been able to sneak up on him and know his weaknesses. Even so, I firmly believe that Ankhesenamun was not the murderer. And who knows, the recent evidence that points to King Tut in fact NOT being murdered, rather dying of an infection in a broken leg might be true. I don't know, I personally believe that he was murdered more because it is interesting AND Ay did seem to really want to take over the throne. But whatever the case was, I do staunchly believe (and hope) that it was NOT Ankhesenamun.

According to the opinions I read, I realize that more or less the opinion on Tut's death are the same: Ankhesenamon didn't kill him. That's okay, I can agree with it. 'Til now I heard of a chariot accident, that could be true... But now a new hypotesis rose on my mind: let's suppose that Ay tambered the chariot with... could it be possible? I don't think it could be impossible...

Joined:Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:47 pmPosts:155Location: United States of America

Hatshepsut76 wrote:

According to the opinions I read, I realize that more or less the opinion on Tut's death are the same: Ankhesenamon didn't kill him. That's okay, I can agree with it. 'Til now I heard of a chariot accident, that could be true... But now a new hypotesis rose on my mind: let's suppose that Ay tambered the chariot with... could it be possible? I don't think it could be impossible...

Yes, it could have been a chariot accident as well. Of course, I wouldnt know, and neither would any of you...it's all educated guess and opinion. There's so many theories out there it's hard to know which one to believe.

Joined:Mon May 09, 2005 9:22 amPosts:574Location: The palace of Tutness!

Ankhesenamun_1 wrote:

Hatshepsut76 wrote:

According to the opinions I read, I realize that more or less the opinion on Tut's death are the same: Ankhesenamon didn't kill him. That's okay, I can agree with it. 'Til now I heard of a chariot accident, that could be true... But now a new hypotesis rose on my mind: let's suppose that Ay tambered the chariot with... could it be possible? I don't think it could be impossible...

Yes, it could have been a chariot accident as well. Of course, I wouldnt know, and neither would any of you...it's all educated guess and opinion. There's so many theories out there it's hard to know which one to believe.

Sorry, but you know the Tutness must open her mouth about this. If I may, I don't think Ay would've messed with the chariots. That seems like a job for Horemheb. And Horemheb erased Akhenaten, Tut, AND Ay from the king's list. It was all betrayal from the beginning. Greed really does consume all. Greed, Pride, Envy, Lust, wrath...that's 5 out of 7 sins right there.

Lol, wonder who was the glutton...? *cough!* Akhenaten! *cough!*

But yeah, with the CT scans on Tut and all...people are starting to doubt if Tut was really murdered at all. Seems like nothing more than a murder mystery novel to some. I'm neautral, cause in my TuT! comic, Tut's not murdered. Just...it's a long story.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum