Spend half a century fighting communism, then move onto the Islamists, and then in the midst of all this Americans cry the merits of an ISLAMO-MARXIST TERRORIST GROUP. Yes you complete bunch of idiots, they are Islamists, Marxist and Terrorists… Remember the evil reds? Remember the evil mullahs? Remember the planes in New York? Combine the three and you have your average MEK nutbag… Nevermind the personality sect aspect.

Even funnier, you guys do realise they tried to assasinate Nixon in Tehran? Like i said, HILARIOUS!

Friggin tools the lot of you…

]]>By: Logical123http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33832
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:44:53 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33832All who unwittingly support the MEK should read the following two Web sites. There is much more information on the net of a similar nature. In the second reference, it is stated (by a former member): “all people who were married, were forced to get divorced (at Camp Ashraf in Iraq), and now you can not find any married person and family in their internal relations.” In fact, they threaten to burn themselves down like David Kuresh. Here are the references:

As I said earlier, if you see them on TV, they are like mindless robots and follow whatever the Rajavis order them to do.

]]>By: fairmanhttp://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33831
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:40:46 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33831logical123
We are not here to like or dislike the MEK. They have advocates and of course opponents like you. But the question here is if MEK is or is not terrorist. For even the layman,the simple fact that MEK is appealing to justice system rather than advancing its agenda through intimidation and killing indicates that they are not terrorist. It is in the court room that all of the propaganda and accusations like yours prove baseless. None of the accusing governments have ever mentioned MEk’s armed activities against the Iranian regime in the past as a reason for listing because they are aware of the undefendability of the regime’s inhumane character. Instead they have sought and resorted to some weak accusations and unsubstantiated claims of wrong doing by the MEK in their countries. Therefore the listing is merely a political decision. MEK is challenging this political decision by winning the court verdicts and joining forces to reverse the listing and correct the politics about Iran.
Thanks to Mr. Debusmann for the informed and balanced article
]]>By: Taha1http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33830
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:44:04 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33830You people are just incredible. The MKO is the most despised Iranian opposition group, and rightly so. They have about as much support in Iran as the Ku Klux Klan does in America. They bombed and killed hundreds of people in the early years of the Islamic Republic, both government officials and civilians. My father was in a mosque in Tehran once; it was almost time for prayer, and an MKO member invited some people to stand on a carpet he had brought, and then left. The men who went to stand on the carpet exploded. MKO members also beat my grandfather because he was a cleric who supported Khomeini and the new regime. The MKO also killed President Rajai and Prime Minister Bahonar, as well as 72 MPs of the Islamic Republic Party. Their most treacherous act was to ally themselves with the evil Saddam Hussein to kill Iranian troops during the war. (How would you feel if a group of American citizens cooperated with Al-Qaeda?) To say that they have broad support in Iran is to say that a large portion of the Iranian population are crazed lunatics. In fact, without them, the Islamic Republic would probably end up being far more liberal, as its officials and citizens would have been in less danger in its early years.
]]>By: Logical123http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33829
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:17:40 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33829All these MEK supporters, have you ever watched an MEK convention on television when one of the Rajavis is present? If not, then you don’t know what you are talking about. The MEK members are indeed like zombies worshiping anything the Rajavis say (I don’t know where the husband is now). So, dream on as much as you want.
]]>By: Manocherhttp://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33823
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:08:11 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33823First I would like to thank MEK for hard working and inexhaustible struggle under so many years for Iranian human rights and democracy in Iran against this inhuman regime.
Thanks Mr. Bernd Debusmann for the article which contains a lot of truths.
]]>By: kramer2010http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33822
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 13:24:08 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33822The US needs to push the reset button on Iran policy. No one wants to see another war but the idea of supporting the Iranian dissidents is a sound one. We do not need to embrace them. Just do not leash them and let them do what they are supposed to do, i.e. standing up to the tyrants who have devoured Iran and have been a patron of international terror. This is a common ground that all the sensible people could agree upon.
]]>By: ghodrathttp://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33819
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:30:10 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33819As Mr. Bernd Debusmann’s atricle points out,the price of the apeasement policy twoards Iranian Government has always been paid by Iranian peace loving people and the Terorist lable has only served the Ayatollah’s government.it’s sad that our government would still continue to look for “window of opportunity” to tame the Mollahs instead of helping Iranian People in their strugle to establish peace and democracy. There is no doubt in my mind that Iranian people and their beloved Mojahedin will prevail in their heroic strugle to bring pease and democracy to Iran.
]]>By: ghodrathttp://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33818
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:30:08 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33818As Mr. Bernd Debusmann’s atricle points out,the price of the apeasement policy twoards Iranian Government has always been paid by Iranian peace loving people and the Terorist lable has only served the Ayatollah’s government.it’s sad that our government would still continue to look for “window of opportunity” to tame the Mollahs instead of helping Iranian People in their strugle to establish peace and democracy. There is no doubt in my mind that Iranian people and their beloved Mojahedin will prevail in their heroic strugle to bring pease and democracy to Iran.
]]>By: Mitra42http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/11/19/america-iran-and-a-terrorist-label/#comment-33817
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 07:44:33 +0000http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/?p=8693#comment-33817That’s so true Mr. Debusmann. It is time for State Department to de-list the main opposision of this brutal regime. Madame Secretary should obey the court decision sooner than later. This is what we, as Iranian people, are asking. Enough is enough. It is time for the right decision to support the Iranian people and be on their side. US, US, listen to this, we want PMOI/MEK off the list.
]]>