There's a Communist Living in the white House

Dr. Taitz on Obama

The Enemy is Obama

How to Become an Underground Publisher and help take back America

There you will find directions and suggested material and web sites to check to find other material. You are welcome to take material from this site, the info service site, or just find your own. Whatever please commit to spread the word.

Editor’s Note: The following report is solely the product of the authors and is posted here for the public to view, and discern for themselves. It is a scholarly work and may clear up many questions readers may have.

World Net Daily, which has been following the Lakin trial step-by-step from the beginning, is reporting:

FT. MEADE, Md. – A career officer in the U.S. Army [Col. Denise R. Lind] acting as a judge in the prosecution of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin today ruled that the military is no place for Barak Obama’s presidential eligibility to be evaluated.
According to the WND report, presiding authority Col. Denise R. Lind used the following arguments to deny LTC Lakin proper access to a defense, summarized in the following three paragraphs taken from the 40 minute long reading of her decision Army Col. Denise R. Lind today ruled in a hearing regarding the evidence to be allowed in the scheduled October court-martial of Lakin that he will be denied access to any of Obama’s records as well as any testimony from those who may have access to the records.

With her decision, Lind mirrored a number of federal judges who have ruled on civil lawsuits over Obama’s eligibility. They have without exception denied the plaintiffs’ access to any requested documentation regarding the president’s eligibility.
Lind ruled that it was “not relevant” for the military to be considering such claims, that the laws allegedly violated by Lakin were legitimate on their face and that the chain of command led up to the Pentagon, and that should have been sufficient for Lakin.

We find foundational flaws in Col. Lind’s decision, which Lakin’s defense team must seize upon in order to alter the current course of this trial.

1 – Lind’s authority is derived from the same place as LTC Lakin’s and all other members of the United States Military – from the supreme command of the office of Commander-in-Chief, the President of the United States.

2 – Lind is attempting to use her authority under her Commander-in-Chief to break the military chain of command, isolating the Commander-in-Chief of the US Military specifically, exempting the President from his position of authority in the chain of command, without which, Lind herself has no authority to convene the Courts Martial.

3 – Lind then reaches outside of the US Military Justice system to the Civil Court, relying upon civil court precedent to deny Lakin any access to discovery and thereby, a proper defense guaranteed him by the US Constitution and UCMJ, Uniform Code of Military Justice. Civil Court precedent has no legal standing in a UCMJ criminal proceeding. In fact, the UCMJ is based upon the Articles of War (aka War Articles) and is a “penal system” unlike the US Justice System – as explained by Col. William Winthrop in Military Law and Precedents. As a result, precedents set in courts outside of the UCMJ are without legal standing in any UCMJ proceeding.

4 – Not even in the UCMJ can the United States government deny the accused his/her right to a trial, complete with discovery of related evidence. Yet Lind attempts to do so, under the authority derived from her Commander-in-Chief. If the chain of command is broken, then Lind herself has no authority.

5 – Lind’s statement that the legality of the Commander-in-Chief is “not relevant” in matters of military command is false on its face. As stated in a sworn affidavit filed by LTG Thomas G. McInerney executed on August 20, 2010 – “In refusing to obey orders because of his doubts as to their legality, LTC Lakin has acted exactly as proper training dictates. – By thus stepping up to the bar, LTC Lakin is demonstrating the courage of his convictions and his bravery. – That said, it is equally essential that he be allowed access to the evidence that will prove whether he made the correct decision.”

6 – Lind attempts to break the chain of command at The Pentagon level, which she claims has no issue with the current Commander-in-Chief and that this should be good enough for Lakin. Yet she cannot break this chain of command without eliminating her own authority, and Lakin’s oath requires that he decide for himself whether or not his orders are legal, as affirmed in LTG McInerney’s sworn affidavit.

7 – At issue is not whether or not LTC Lakin refused orders, but rather whether or not he “unlawfully” refused orders. If his orders were not “lawful,” including but not limited to, emanating from a “lawful” chain of command which begins with a lawful Commander-in-Chief, then Lakin must be found NOT GUILTY of “unlawfully” refusing orders.
At the heart of the matter is whether or not his orders to deploy were “lawful.” LTC Lakin has questioned whether or not his deployment orders were “lawful” on the basis that he believes that the Commander-in-Chief from which those orders are issued, may not be “lawful,” therefore making any orders from the top of military command “unlawful.”
To determine whether or not Lakin is correct in his decision to refuse orders, it is paramount to discover with certainty whether or not his orders were issued by a “lawful” command.
As we know, Article II – Section I requires that only a “natural born citizen” of the United States can hold the office of President, Commander-in-Chief. In this regard, a fatal misstep in the Lakin defense has opened the door for the illegitimate statements now being made by Col. Denise R. Lind.

LTC Lakin failed to directly assert that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT legal in his command on the basis that we know with certainty that he is not a “natural born citizen,” – and that LTC Lakin is “lawfully” refusing to follow orders on this basis. Instead, LTC Lakin only asked the “birth place” question and tied that question to whether or not Mr. Obama could and would present an official “birth certificate” proving once and for all that he was indeed born in Hawaii, making the wrong assumption that if he could and would provide proof of said birth via an official birth certificate, which has never been released to date.

The fatal error revolves around the reality that Obama’s birth place is of no consequence in the matter of his status as a “natural born citizen” eligible for high Command of the US Military under Article II – Section I of the Constitution. Although there is no shortage of opinions on the subject of what the term “natural born citizen” means, there is no honest debate on the matter either.

Every Supreme Court Justice knows exactly what the term “natural born citizen” means, where it came from, why it exists in Article II requirements for the office of President and that Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a “natural born citizen,” indeed ineligible for the office he currently holds.

They know that LTC Lakin is right to “lawfully” refuse orders from an illegal Command.

We know this on the basis of the following critical facts:

1 – The term “natural born citizen” is derived from the Law of Nations. An international treaty establishing a set of rules used to establish a “nation,” the issue of nation and citizen sovereignty, and internationally recognized definitions of universal terms, including the term “natural born citizen.”

2 – The Law of Nations is specifically mentioned in the US Constitution as an enumerated power of Congress under Article I – Section VIII – Item X – “To define and punish offenses against the Law of Nations;” (Note that in the original Constitution, Law of Nations is capitalized, referring specifically to THE Law of Nations.)

3 – From Emerich de Vattel’s 1758 book on The Law of Nations, Chapter 19 § 212. – Of the citizens and natives – Vattel establishes – “in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

4 – In a letter from Founder John Jay to then President of the Constitutional Convention George Washington, Jay stated – “Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

5 – It was later learned that President George Washington had actually taken out Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations from the local library in order to study proper implementation of law in our newly formed nation, and never returned that book. On the basis of known history and facts behind the Constitutional term “natural born citizen” which is based upon “natural law” explained in the Law of Nations as stated referred to in the US Constitution, the proper assertion is not at all related to the actual “birth place” of Barack Hussein Obama, II. The ongoing search for a Hawaiian birth certificate has no bearing on the subject of “natural born citizen” status for Barack Hussein Obama, II.

The only relative question is:

Was Barack Hussein Obama’s birth father a legal citizen of the United States of America at the time of his birth, no matter where in the world he may have been born? Without a birth father who was a legal citizen of the United States at the time of his birth, Barack Hussein Obama, II cannot be a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, he is not without divided national loyalties, and cannot serve as President of the United States or Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military as a result, creating a national security and a full blown Constitutional crisis.

According to the two autobiographical books by Barack Hussein Obama, II – his birth father is Barack Hussein Obama, a British subject at the time and a legal citizen of Kenya. According to public family history, Barack Hussein Obama was at no time in his life a legal citizen of the United States.

On this basis alone, LTC Lakin is right (and lawful) in refusing to accept orders from an illegal command. The US Constitution and the Law of Nations, upon which our sovereign nation was formed, are very clear on the matter.

As a result, the need for LTC Lakin to gain access to the Hawaiian birth records for Barack Hussein Obama, II is eliminated.

LTC Lakin need only assert the following:

On the basis of Article II – Section I of the US Constitution, supported by Article I – Section VIII – Item X concerning the Law of Nations and the term “natural born citizen,” – I hereby refuse any and all illegal orders issued by the illegal Commander-in-Chief of the United States Military, President Barack Hussein Obama, on the basis that he does not meet Constitutional requirements for the office he currently holds and must further hereby demand that he be removed from office and immediately relieved of Command of the United States Military. I further assert that due to the illegal status of existing Military high Command that this Court Martial has no authority under which to proceed.

Under this assertion, there is no need for access to the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama, II, unless Mr. Obama chooses to respond by stating that Barack Hussein Obama is not his real birth father, in which case Mr. Obama is admitting to fraud during his pursuit of the Oval Office.
In the event that the UCMJ chooses to challenge the historically accurate definition of the term “natural born citizen” described herein, the US Supreme Court is the only court in the land with proper authority to rule on the true meaning of the term “natural born citizen” – as stated by the Constitutional protections that LTC Lakin has sworn a lifetime to protect and defend.

With this assertion is place, LTC Lakin does not have to prove that his assertions are true and accurate. As Commander-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama must prove that Lakin’s assertion is false in order to proceed with the government prosecution of LTC Lakin on the grounds that he has “unlawfully” refused orders.

In short, Mr. Obama must prove that his orders are in fact “lawful.” If Obama is either unable or unwilling to do so, then LTC Lakin is in fact NOT GUILTY of “unlawfully” refusing orders.

This particular case is not about one soldier refusing deployment orders. It is about a nation allowing a precedent to stand which makes it possible for any individual with any foreign allegiance to hold the highest office in this land, with no obligation whatsoever to demonstrate or prove national loyalties before holding the office of President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief.

This case is about whether or not the US Constitution stands as the official Law of this land.

NOTE: Past challenges on the term “natural born citizen” have been improperly argued upon cases revolving around the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment relates to “immigration” and “naturalization” laws, not “natural law” used to establish “natural born citizenship” status of an individual. Therefore, any and all cases pertaining to Fourteenth Amendment arguments are moot on the matter of “natural born citizen” claims.

U.S. HISTORY REPETITIVE TO END TIMEI - Bondage to Spiritual Faith - Year of The MayflowerII - From Spiritual Faith to great Courage - 1776III - From Courage to Liberty - Constitution 1791IV - From Liberty to Abundance - 1900 to 1960V - From Abundance to Complacency - 1960 to 1980VI - From Complacency to Apathy - 1980 to 2000VII - From Apathy to Dependence - 2000 to 2009 VIII - From Dependence back into Bondage by CONTRIVANCEIX - From Bondage to Spiritual Faith - 2010 to ? by REVIVAL or DEMISE - WWIIIX - RAPTURE - Blessed Assurance has Come - NEW JERUSALEM

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Predictably, Joan Swirsky's new release is a bombshell! It is a piece that should be preserved for history in our Library of Congress. Please take the time during this busy Christmas season to read Joan's exceptional commentary and share it with as many as you can. This column proves again why those who love her faithfully call her our 'Joan of America!' WHY?.........because we can trust Joan's vigilance as an intrepid warrior against all that threatens our liberty, national sovereignty and continued freedom, and because we can trust all that she reports. Each piece of information is assiduously backed by factual original sourcing............and because Joan 'never sleeps' when it comes to serving, protecting and defending America!
That's why!

The fanatical hard Left—those communists, socialists, and radicals currently in power—view anything that is bad for our country—massive Intelligence leaks, disastrous oil spills, escalating unemployment, chaos on our borders, military setbacks, et al—as a thundering success. To them, anything that undermines the United States brings them closer to their Grand Plan of toppling Big Bad America and transforming it into the kind of totalitarian Banana Republic they never tire of glamorizing.
That’s why it is clear to me that the potential damage from the Australian-born Julian Assange’s release of 250,000 classified State Department and Pentagon cables on November 28—and an equal number last July—is part not only of this Australian’s wish to harm our country but also the American Left’s premeditated and malevolent plan to destroy America. And let us not forget that Assange’s assault began in April 2010 with nearly 80,000 documents “dumped” for public consumption, as well as another 400,000 that the Marxist Assange released in October 2010—all of which he claims are just the tip of the iceberg.

THE ACCOUNTABILITY FACTOR
Clearly Assange is delighted that his leaks have gained international attention. And so delighted are the Russians with his anti-American raison d’être that they suggested he be rewarded with a Nobel Prize!

It is obvious that “president” Obama is pleased as well. Hence the complete lack of reaction or sanction not only from Attorney General Eric Holder, who seems never to have met a thug he didn’t like, but especially from Mr. Obama himself, who to this day cannot bring himself to speak out against Assange.

In an article entitled The lunatic who thinks he’s Barack Obama, Spengler writes: “Napoleon was a Lunatic who thought he was Napoleon, and the joke applies to the 44th United States president with a vengeance. What doesn’t the president know, and when didn’t he know it? American foreign policy turned delusional when Barack Obama took office, and the latest batch of leaks suggests that the main source of the delusion is sitting in the Oval Office.”

As for Holder, writer Quin Hillyer elaborates at length in this must-read article on the AG, stating that “the Obama Department of Justice is dangerously politicized, radically leftist, racialist, lawless, and at times corrupt. The good news is that it’s also often incompetent.”

As author and journalist Austin Bay has written: “WikiLeaks harms the US. But the president’s refusal to acknowledge the threats we face is a bigger danger.” Bay calls Obama’s response “weak, wrong-headed and erratic.

“...His secretary of state does not comprehend that America is the subject of the attack, his department of defense is not interested in defending us, and the president himself seems utterly indifferent to the whole affair. All of this underscores the real problem. It is not WikiLeaks that ultimately imperils our national security, but the failing Obama administration, which ignores the nature and extent of threats we face, and which is too often unwilling to act to thwart them.”

Bay’s comments echo those made by Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, who commented to Reuters that it is “not WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange [who is] legally liable, but rather the questionable “adequacy” of U.S. security.

Well far be it for the man who has spent his entire tenure at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to be at all displeased that the WikiLeaks revelations cast our country in the worst possible light. For the past 24 months, after all, he has been:

Apologizing for America.
Denying her exceptionalism.
Undermining our military, as reporter Arnie Rosner describes here in detail.
Suing Arizona for simply upholding federal immigration law.
Kowtowing to and cozily fist-bumping our country’s enemies.
Being as incapable of saluting Congressional Medal of Honor recipient Staff Sergeant Salvatore Giunta at a recent White House ceremony as he has been at saluting the American flag on numerous occasions, just two examples here and here .
And enacting, as Ben Lieberman chillingly describes, job-killing measures in industries that are the lifeblood of our country, but that he and his fellow environmental radicals revile: oil exploration, factory manufacturing, mining, and fishing
But all this is not surprising, as a new book by Stanley Kurtz—Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism—demonstrates.

Like a rotten fish, the reaction to the whole WikiLeaks thing stinks—as they say—from the head, meaning not only Obama but also his Capo di Tutti Capi, George Soros, whose major role in the political lives of both Hillary and Obama and their historically toxic anti-American agendas has been brilliantly, rivetingly, and illuminatingly spelled out in exquisite detail in The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party by David Horowitz and Richard Poe.

THE HILLARY FACTOR
Of course our Secretary of State pretended to be outraged when in truth she and other Leftists in our government are secretly thrilled that America is made to look weak and feckless, with an incredibly incompetent Intelligence system and an indiscriminately murderous Military. Her statement of “outrage” was delivered so robotically that she may as well have been telling a waiter that her tuna-melt was cold.

I’m sure that when both our allies and enemies learned that the treacherous Ms. Hillary was involved in—gasp—treachery, asking for U.N. personnel’s telephone numbers, e-mails, credit card data and frequent-flier numbers, spewing insults at foreign dignitaries, etc., not a single eyebrow was raised in surprise.

As journalist Tyler Durden has written: “When we first heard of the latest Wikileaks `cablegate’ fiasco, we speculated that Hillary Clinton may be forced to resign for what is rapidly becoming the biggest crisis for US foreign policy since the Bay of Pigs. Let’s recall that Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment under somewhat comparable circumstances.”

Rich, is it not, that Hillary sat on Nixon’s impeachment panel, but now this acolyte of anti-American radicals Saul Alinsky and George Soros is being accused of the same rank corruption!?

Liberal writer David Corn seems to think that Hillary’s departure will be just a shade less ignominious than Nixon’s. “Diplomacy is about face,” he writes in the Arizona Sentinel, “and the only way for other nations to save face will be to give them Clinton’s scalp. There is no way that the new WikiLeaks leaks don’t leave Hillary Clinton holding the smoking gun. The time for her departure may come next week or next month, but sooner or later, the weakened and humiliated secretary of state will have to pay.”

Ironic too that the Nixon-era exposés that Woodward and Bernstein were lionized for by the Left, as well as the release of the Pentagon Papers and the Ellsberg Papers, are the same kind of exposés Assange is being vilified for. Leftists still thrill at bad news for America, only not when they’re in power! Liberal hypocrisy knows no bounds.

WHO BENEFITS?
Just who exactly benefits when Hillary is thrown under the bus? Certainly Obama benefits by having a potential rival in 2012 tainted irreparably. What amazing timing that these particular leaks came so closely after the midterms, when the 2012 presidential race de facto began.

Personally, I don’t believe Obama will run again, as I spelled out in my last article, “Obama Won’t Run…His Work Is Done.” But the leaks will keep Hill and Bill, the perpetual thorns in Obama’s side (especially after Bubba stole the show in the White House last week), scrambling to re-burnish her tarnished broomstick image.

But according to Dr. Jack Wheeler, a longtime Washington insider, all the burnishing in the world won’t help. Everyone ”should shout Hallelujah for the enormous act of public service Assange has performed,” Wheeler writes. “He has single-handedly obliterated—as in nuked—Hillary Clinton’s chances for the White House. `The greatest foreign policy disaster in US history` has happened on Hillary’s watch. Any chief executive would have to fire her, and Zero [Wheeler’s name for Obama] needs a scapegoat in any regard. Her political career is over - finita la musica, the Clinton’s music is finished. Thanks, Julian.”

When you think about the magnitude of Assange’s assault on America, you know two things immediately:

Private Bradley Manning, the man accused of disseminating the leaks while pretending to listen to Lady Gaga, was certainly a minor cog (or perhaps scapegoat) in a much huger scenario. Manning’s rank had been reduced and he was considered a potential candidate for discharge for unsatisfactory performance, but strangely retained his clearance. Was that decision made by the same “authority” who knew about but failed to report the terrorist links and jihadist rants of U.S. Army major and psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan, the Palestinian Muslim fanatic who on February 9, 2009, murdered 13 people in cold blood at Fort Hood in Texas?
The suspicions that the torrent of WikiLeaks was orchestrated by the Obama government, with the generous help of a craven left-wing media, are increasingly credible. How else to explain their absolute lack of intervention? When the feds want to stop something or kill someone anywhere in the world—except for Osama bin Laden—poof! But in this case, nothing!
Again, who benefits?

Certainly Obama would benefit by using the leaks as a pretext to abandon our missions in Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving the 50-million people in those countries who tasted democracy for the first time—through the ballot as well as the press—to the predatory machinations of the more feudal hordes who operated with both savagery and impunity before our military campaigns introduced them to the 21st century. Clearly he hates (and is not very proficient in) foreign policy and would love those billions to help support his socialist domestic agenda.
Again, Obama would benefit by using Assange’s abuse of the Internet to actualize his own and his henchmen’s oft-stated desire to censor if not downright control Internet content, especially when it comes to voices that dispute his uber-Leftist policies. Eric Blair has spelled this out in “WikiLeaks Being Used to Justify `Patriot Act` Legislation for Internet.”
And yet again Obama would benefit by delivering to his overseers and puppet masters worldwide publicity for the view they all share: America is bad!
THE CO-CONSPIRATORS
No wonder that the personal flunkies of this regime, who share their anti-American views—most egregiously The New York Times—couldn’t wait to publish leaks potentially damaging to the United States.

As Pamela Geller of AtlasShrugs.com points out, Obama “ignored the whole WikiLeaks issue [but] he could only accomplish this with the tacit support and silence of the media. Once again the criminal media is providing aid and comfort to our enemies. It had to strike you as ironic that the New York Times would not publish the 13,000 Climategate emails because they were `private emails` but they had no problem with the treason of WikiLeaks.”

And as the Gawker website states: Holder said that a “criminal investigation into Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is more than just `saber-rattling’ and Justice Department officials are claiming he violated the Espionage Act. If that’s true, isn’t the New York Times guilty as well? If Holder really believes that the Espionage Act is a constitutional law that ought to be enforced—as opposed to a mere pretext for making Assange’s life as miserable as possible—then he’d better be prepared to go after the New York Times, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, and El Pais, all of which published the classified cables after being granted early access and were part of a clear conspiracy with Wikileaks to break the Espionage Act. So if it was a crime when Assange obtained the database, why wasn’t it a crime when the Times did?”

Apparently, the The U.S. Air Force is asking the same question, which is why this branch of our military has blocked the website of The New York Times on its computers, because the paper published bits of secret diplomatic cables leaked by secret-sharing site Wikile

Here is a mere smattering of leaks the Times gleefully published:

Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. I wrote about this here in 2005, Geller has documented this fact exhaustively, and Jim Kouri, columnist for The Examiner and Chiefs of Police executive, said that the Wikileaks classified documents “reveal that U.S. military intelligence discovered chemical weapons labs, encountered insurgents who were specialists in the creation of toxins, and uncovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq…as late as 2008, American troops continued to find WMD in the region.” No other conclusion but that the Leftist media knew this but withheld it in their shameful obsession to discredit Pres. Bush.
A detailed list of sites throughout the world that U.S. officials say could be vulnerable to terrorist attack.
Cables indicating that the U.S. leaked documents designed to pit Middle East governments against each other.
Sec. of State Clinton’s charges that Saudi Arabia is the Number One financier of terrorist activity “worldwide.”
WikiLeaks Exposes White House’s Conscious Support of Islamists, written by Seth Mandel.
Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah, the King of Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak, et al, all placed the threat of a nuclear Iran far ahead of the concern they had, if any, with the Israel-Palestinian issue, practically begging Obama to take military action, to no avail. Former Israeli minister and journalist on Irapundit, Yoram Ettinger writes: “...the [WikiLeaks] documents refute Obama’s fundamental assumptions…that the Palestinian issue is a root cause of Middle East turbulence and anti-Western terrorism; that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are allies of the US; that there is no Islamic terrorism since Islam promotes peace and not terrorism; that there is no Jihadist terrorism since Jihad is a process which purifies the soul; that there is no global terrorism…” Morton A. Klein, the national president of the Zionist Organization of America, says that the Obama Administration “has been cynically using the Iranian nuclear issue as a tool for extracting concessions from Israel, knowing all the while that such concessions bear no relation whatsoever to regional support for confronting Iran. These cables increase the validity of many analysts and journalists views who state that President Obama may be the most hostile president to Israel, ever.”
Tehran has used the Iranian Red Crescent (member of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) to smuggle weapons and Iranian Revolutionary Guards’ forces into Lebanon during the 2006 Hezbollah-Israel war, and into Iraq, to fight against U.S. soldiers.
North Korea is supplying Iran with advanced ballistic missile systems that could accurately hit Tel Aviv or Moscow, and is also playing a significant role in the proliferation of nuclear equipment and ballistic delivery systems in the Middle East.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is “an exceptionally dangerous” Islamist, whose anti-Israel rhetoric derives from a personal, visceral hatred of Israel.
According to Joshuapundit, citing Doug Ross: “Wikileaks Proved Obama Lied Repeatedly About Middle East Policy.” The blog reports that Obama “has a sentimental sympathy for Islam, which explains his coddling of Iran and Pakistan and his animus towards Israel… If you feel like you may have seen this movie before, you have…in the appeasement of Hitler by Britain prior to WWII. Wikileaks, if nothing else, revealed exactly how incompetent and dangerous Barack Obama really is.”
In this video by Dick Morris, Clinton’s former advisor explains why Obama’s disgraceful abandonment of Israel could lead to a “second Holocaust.”
Jim Kouri, mentioned above, reports that this week “a new threat emerged in the world of cybersecurity: `hacktivists` have openly launched retaliatory attacks on businesses, organizations and even governments, shutting down their websites for hours or days, in protest over actions taken against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.”

Given the clear advantage Obama stands to yield from Assange’s leaks, could these attacks also have been coordinated from the White House?

THE MORE THINGS CHANGE…
Columnist Daniel Greenfield explains that “the Wikileaks mess is a reminder that the enmity of the International Left did not die when the Soviet Union did. It sends the stark message that we have political enemies who are using the internet to organize their attacks in new and dangerous ways. From Soros to Assange to Chavez, the International Left is a highly active and dangerous foe, and it is working to aid Islamic terrorists…because speaking the truth out loud would be `unhelpful` and embarrassing to the Muslim regimes whom they fear and whose favor they court.”

So true, and I also agree with Vasko Kohlmayer who has called WikiLeaks “Obama’s Katrina” [and] Hillary Clinton “the Michael Brown in this affair.” He goes on to write:

“Our government officials tell us that Assange’s act somehow poses a threat to our national security by undermining America’s foreign policy. One may as well ask: What foreign policy? The cables show something many have always known—that most so-called leaders and politicians are liars, schemers, crooks, egomaniacs, and incompetents.

“Ask yourself this: Who is the greater threat to America? Is it an Australian programmer or Barack Obama? Assange is merely a website operator. He has no backing or powers to inflict harm on this country. Obama, on the other hand, has been using the powers of his office to systematically destroy the American economy, the dollar, our standard of living, and our standing in the world. He has been stoking racial tensions. He has been taking private property of American citizens and giving it to his friends. He and his people have been destroying the values and fabric of American society faster than you can say `bam.’ In reality, it is this regime that is a menace to America.

“But above all, let us not get fooled this time around. The ruling elites will try to play on our patriotic feelings in order to save their skins. Contrary to what you will hear from this administration and its acolytes, WikiLeaks’ disclosures are not a threat to America. But they are an immense threat to the current regime, because they represent a colossal indictment of its incompetence and doltishness.” Amen, Mr. Kohlmayer.

As I stated in my last article, the Left has two bedrock so-called principles, the first being: If it’s bad for America, it’s good! Clearly these leaks are bad for America, which is why I’m firmly convinced that the regime in Washington, D.C. is behind them, or at least complicit, and that indeed Barack Obama is in bed—so to speak—with Julian Assange.

I remember in the mid-seventies hating the Supreme Court decision to allow Nazis to march through the streets of Skokie, Illinois. But I had to agree with the Court that the right of free speech (and assembly) was more important than my personal feelings. And I agree with Fox Business Network’s Judge Andrew Napolitano that Assange has the same right to free speech, objectionable as it may be.

The problem with the WikiLeaks is not that they will threaten our national security. The problem is that our national security is threatened by a far worse menace, specifically by the man I consider a usurper in the White House and his rogue regime.

Writers like me hate to repeat themselves, but I have to end this article the same way I ended another fairly recent article. It is with the three words most deeply in my heart: God Save America!

Joan Swirsky Bio
Joan Swirsky Most recent columns
Joan Swirsky is an award winning author and journalist. Her work can be found at joanswirsky.com

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Yes, America, you are watching while Washington attempts to right itself and Obama self-destructs. What does a country and its citizens do as their nation continues to decline in power, financial stability and security of its people? We at Stand Up America shout aloud that we the people must stay strong and help right the national ship.

The Declaration of Independence states:

“To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”

The ship has been righted to some degree by the November elections but so much more needs to be done.

We cannot permit the current leaders in the White House and Halls of Congress to continue in their efforts to lead us down the road of Progressive Socialism and global government initiatives. In our opinion, President Obama, his appointees and his czars must be replaced immediately.

This is the current battle that we Constitutionalists face and we must be aggressive in our efforts. Obama will continue to by pass Congress in his progressive agenda and issue extensive Executive Orders. Congress, you must stand tall for the American people and enjoin the Supreme Court to halt Executive branch violations of law and the Constitution.

Incompetence, corruption and Dishonesty of officials now come into play as relates to our National Security and Economy and is the rationale for resignations and a change of government. My emphasis in this article will be a continued plea for Americans to Demand Resignation of these officials by the people of this country.

We are at a point that if Demand Resignations and a new Congressional make up do change the direction of the country then we must proceed to Impeachment and a serious transfer of Power at the highest levels of government. Obama’s eligibility to be President must be totally vetted to confirm his legitimacy.

Lincoln issued this warning in his inaugural address:

“Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.”

Being a representative republic, not a democracy, and “rising up” means other than revolution by use of arms. The people must “rise up” (Stand Up as we say now) from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are limited in the peaceful transfer of power…resignation, elections, and impeachment.

The oath is simple and reads:

“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Sadly, we have seen them violate their oath. Fraud, lying, and corruption are rampant and some have engaged in treasonous activities, and they effectively thumb their noses at us and have sold you to the highest bidder.

The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution, which granted the federal government enough authority to cultivate, promote and secure the Blessings of Liberty. The balance of authority and individual liberty was understood. Power was confined to that which was enumerated in the Constitution with a certain and meaningful intent for check and balances.

Article One, S5, CII and the 10th Amendment provides the authority but this has been trumped by a system that rewards the powerful. In 1803 each congressional district averaged 38,476 people. In 2010 it is forecast to exceed 710,000. These numbers indicate power growth, and it effectively grew eight fold in the 20th century alone. No wonder our representatives seek to stay in office so long.

Power, money and benefits beyond the reach of most Americans are the basis now for many politicians and revolving door appointees staying in office. They must be termed out. With incumbency comes power. The party in the majority assigns power, so a long-term sitting representative can expect such power. A representative expected to stay in office in the 3rd Congress for approximately two years now expects 12 years, or 6 terms – so much for a “citizen government.”

But this can be changed through grass roots organization and discourse. We must make it a local imperative and movement….of the People…by the People… and for the People.

“We, the People” have had enough.
Enough is Enough.

The Obama White House and identifiable Members of Congress are now on a progressive socialist and treasonous death march and are bankrupting the country beyond expectations. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. “We, the People” cannot necessarily wait for the next round of elections. It is now that many of these public servants (and you know who they are) must put the people and country interests above self-interest by resigning immediately.

A civil uprising is still not out of the question as “pain” grips the country more each day. I am confident resignations will be forthcoming based on the efforts of the people. The 2010 vote is critical. This means raising your voice now to your neighbors, family, co-workers, and friends. Grass roots efforts have begun; it is now time to put this effort into over drive. America, stand tall together and we will weather the storm but we must act now!

If we think that this election has changed Obama’s objective, think again. He will resort to his executive privilege to get his agenda in place from the information that we are receiving. http://standupamericaus.com/america-witnesses-the-downfall-of-obama

Must Listen--Here's to You Obama--We Are Not Stupid

Are We Fighting A War On Terror or Aren't We?

Thought you might like to read this letter to the editor of a
British national newspaper.

Ever notice how some people just seem to know how to write a letter?Here is a woman who should run for Prime Minister!Written by a housewife, to her daily newspaper.

This is one ticked off lady.'Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we?

Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it
to our shores in July, 2002, and in New York Sept 11,2001 and have continually threatened to do so since?

Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered
that day in London , and in downtown Manhattan , and in
a field in Pennsylvania ?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming
to be tortured by a justice system of the nation they come from and are fighting against in a brutal insurgency.I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11 and 7/7.I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East
start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a
crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan.

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for
hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his
gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques and behind women and children. I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of Nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.I'll care when the British media stops pretending that their freedom
of speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home to hear about them when something happens.

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a British soldier
roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:I don't care.When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take this to the bank: I don't care.When I hear that a prisoner - who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and 'fed special food' that is paid for by my taxes - is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:I don't care. And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times 'Quran.'

Well, believe me!! you guessed it ......I don't care!!If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends.
Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behaviour!If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button.

Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great country!

And may I add:'Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. Our soldiers don't have that problem.'I have another quote that I would like to add, AND...I hope you forward all this.The only defining forces that have ever offered to die for you: The British Soldier, The Canadian Soldier, The US Soldier, and The Australian Soldier. They died for your freedom.

YOU MIGHT WANT TO PASS THIS ON, AS MANY SEEM
TO FORGET ABOUT ALL OF THEM.GIVE THIS LADY A STANDING OVATION.

SHE HAS INDEED TICKED ALL THE BOXES...

Amen to this one!

A M E N - TO THIS ONE ! ! !

Subject: Fw: At a Tennessee Football Game---not a joke

THIS IS AS GOOD AS IT GETS˜GOD BLESS EVERYONE WHO READS THIS AND PASSES IT ON.

I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT A HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL CAN SEE THE PROBLEM, BUT OUR SOCIETY CANNOT.
Tennessee Football This is a statement that was read over the PAsystem at the football game at Roane County High School , Kingston , Tennessee by school Principal, Jody McLeod

"It has always been the custom at Roane County High School football games, to say a prayer and play the National Anthem, to honor God and Country."

Due to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court, I am told that saying a Prayer is a violation of Federal Case Law. As I understand the law at this time, I can use this public facility to approve of sexual perversion and call it "an alternate life style," and if someone is offended, that's OK.

I can use it to condone sexual promiscuity, by dispensing condoms and calling it, "safe sex." If someone is offended, that's OK.

I can even use this public facility to present the merits of killing an unborn baby as a "viable! means of birth control." If someone is offended, no problem...

I can designate a school day as "Earth Day" and involve students in activities to worship religiously and praise the goddess "Mother Earth" and call it "ecology.."

I can use literature, videos and presentations in the classroom that depicts people with strong, traditional Christian convictions as "simple minded" and "ignorant" and call it "enlightenment.."

However, if anyone uses this facility to honor GOD and to ask HIM to Bless this event with safety and good sportsmanship, then Federal Case Law is violated.

This appears to be inconsistent at best, and at worst, diabolical. Apparently, we are to be tolerant of everything and anyone, except GOD and HIS Commandments.

Nevertheless , as a school principal, I frequently ask staff and students to abide by rules with which they do not necessarily agree. For me to do otherwise would be inconsistent at best, and at worst, hypocritical. I suffer from that affliction enough unintentionally. I certainly do not need to add an intentional transgression.

For this reason, I shall "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's," and refrain from praying at this time.

" However, if you feel inspired to honor, praise and thank GOD and ask HIM,in the name of JESUS, to Bless this event, please feel free to do so.. As far as I know, that's not against the law----yet."

One by one, the people in the stands bowed their heads, held hands with one another and began to pray.

They prayed in the stands. They prayed in the team huddles. They prayed at the concession stand and they prayed in the Announcer's Box!

The only place they didn't pray was in the Supreme Court of the United States of America- the Seat of "Justice" in the "one nation, under GOD."

Somehow, Kingston , Tennessee Remembered what so many have forgotten. We are given the Freedom OF Religion, not the Freedom FROM Religion. Praise GOD that HIS remnant remains!

JESUS said, "If you are ashamed of ME before men, then I will be ashamed of you before MY FATHER.."

If you are not ashamed, pass this on .

I'm not one bit ashamed to pass this on, Are you?

THIS IS AS GOOD AS IT GETS˜GOD BLESS EVERYONE WHO READS THIS AND PASSES IT ON.

Can You Believe This?

Muslims Training on American Soil to Murder Americans

OBAMANATION

The Rebellion is Here

The Second American Revolution Has just Begun

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA&feature=player_embedded

America is a Crime Victim

As long as Obama fails to produce the documents to prove he is eligible to be president under our US Constitution, he is a usurper. As long as there is a usurper in the White House, Americans are crime victims.

Active Military Sue Obama

To view Benjamin's profile or write on his Wall, follow this link:
http://www.facebook.com/n/?profile.php&id=798244423&mid=9a0be9G569be4d3G75961bG1b

Song against today's Tyranny

Bean Creek

painted by Therese Daniels

The American Flag--The Greatest

Free Pocket Copy of the US Constitution

The US Constitution is the greatest document ever written by man. It was designed to protect the citizen from invasive government. "The pen is mightier than the sword". If you want to be armed and dangerous, carry a pocket copy of the US Consitution. For those who are aware of their rights are less apt to lose them. USAPatriots-shout wants every American citizen to carry a pocket Constitution. To make this possible, USAPATRIOTS-SHOUT IS GIVING AWAY FREE POCKET COPIES OF THE US CONSTITUTION. TO GET YOUR FREE COPY OF THE US CONSTITUTION SEND US YOUR NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS TO TO USAPATRIOTSHOUT@AOL.COM
_____________________________________________________
The cost of giving the pocket copy of the US Constitution plus postage and handling is being paid by usapatriots-shout, owned by one semi retired citizen. Any donation you can make would help cover the costs to continue this effort to arm every American with a pocket copy of the US Constitution. This is my patriotic contribution to restore America. Thank you
Therese Daniels

US Constitution free download

The United States Constitution 1787
Complete document required reading. The instruction manual for America.
http://pyrabang.com?id=3c894a

Shut Up (The way the left trys to control us)

Buy this bumper sticker--Be Armed and Dangerous--Carry a pocket US Constitution

BlogTalkRadio Share Show Widget

The Obama Deception ( 2 hour version)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw

How Obama Got Elected

A Man Must Live

A MAN MUST LIVE

A man must live. We justify.Low shift and trick to treason high,A little vote for a little goldTo a whole senate bought and sold,By that self evident reply.

But is it so? Pray tell me whyLife at such a cost you have to buy?IN what religion were you toldA man must live?

There are times when a man must die.Imagine, for a battle-cry,From soldiers, with a sword to hold,From soldiers, with the flag unrolled,This coward's whine, this liar's lie--A man must live!

by Charlotte Perkins Gilman

AMERICA FIRST Will not trade truth for Political Correctness

How Patton Would Have Said IT

I think this is how General George S. Patton would sum things up.... and then catch holy hell from Ike. He sure had a unique way of expressing his thoughts. ATTENTION! To ALL those whining, panty-waisted, pathetic Citizens, it's time for a little refresher course on exactly why we Americans occasionally have to fight wars to keep this nation great. See if you can tear yourself away from your "reality" TV and Starbucks for a minute, pull your head out of your ass -- and LISTEN UP!! Abu Ghraib is not "torture" or an "atrocity". This is the kind of thing frat boys, sorority girls, and academy cadets do every year.

A little fun at someone else's expense. Certainly no reason to wring your hands or get your panties in a wad. Got that ? THIS IS an atrocity! So Was This!!! WHICH PART DON'T YOU GET? Islam a peaceful religion??? My Ass!Millions of these warped misled sons-of-bitches are plotting, as we speak, to destroy our country and our way of life any way they can. Some of them are here among us now. They don't want to convert you and don't want to rule you.. They believe you are a vile infestation of Allah's paradise . They don't give a shit how "progressive" you are, how peace-loving you are, or how much you sympathize with their cause. They want your ass dead , and they think it is God's will for them to do it. Some think if we give them a hug or listen to them, then they'll like us, And if you agree?

Then you are a pathetic dumb ass!If they manage to get their hands on a nuke, chemical agents, or even some anthrax -- you will wish to God we had hunted them down and killed THEM while we had the chance.How many more Americans must be beheaded ??You've fallen asleep AGAIN, get your head out of your ass!You may never get another chance! NOW GET OFF YOUR SORRY ASS and pass this on to any and every person you give a damn about.. if you ever gave a damn about anything!

DISMISSED! Do you have enough balls to forward this email.. The truth shall set you free!!

_________________________________________

"The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men." ~ Samuel Adams ~

QUOTE OF THE DECADE:

The American Indians found out what happens, when you do not control immigration.

This site is PRO:

Us. Constitution as written by our fore fathersUse the word God as has been used traditionally since 1776Christian-Judeo & all religions which do not threaten othersSarah Palin and others like herCapitalism, free enterprise, free trade,Israel--our best friend in the Middle EastTelling the truth to the best of our ability & knowledgeMaking wrong doers accountableTaking back America from the criminals

This site is CON:

Usurper ObamaAll Muslims who want to impose Sharia lawsAll MUslims who want to behead infidelsAll Muslims who agree to stoning women & childrenTrading honesty for political correctnessMaking deals with enemiesCompromising the ConstitutionUS Supreme Court for betraying AmericaMSM for suppressing and misrepresenting vital news

Special note: Saying what is so regardless of race, color, or creed is not RACIST. It is merely stating fact. If any one who wants to call me racists or other derrogotory names because I tell the truth, be my guest. It doesn't change who I am. It doesn't change the truth. It tells every thing abou you! Therefore if OJ killed his wife he is a murderer. If Muslims push their own women and children to the front lines to be killed first, they are murderes of their own people. If Obama is not a natural born citizen--he is a usurper. If you can't stand that, then get lost.

______________________________________

Very interesting !!!�He defeated the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954.He told his men to grab us by the belt buckle .. get so close to us,� we couldn't mortar or put artillery on them.��One helluva a warrior .... J.���REMINDER OF HISTORYGeneral Vo Nguyen Giap.General Giap was a brilliant, highly respected leader of the North Vietnam military. The following quote is from his memoirs currently found in the Vietnam war memorial in Hanoi:�'What we still don't understand is why you Americans stopped the bombing of Hanoi. You had us on the ropes. If you had pressed us a little harder, just for another day or two, we were ready to surrender! It was the same at the battles of TET. You defeated us! We knew it, and we thought you knew it.But we were elated to notice your media was definitely helping us. They were causing more disruption in America than we could in the battlefields. We were ready to surrender. You had won!'�General Giap has published his memoirs and confirmed what most Americans knew. The Vietnam war was not lost in Vietnam -- it was lost at home. The exact same slippery slope, sponsored by the US media, is currently well underway. It exposes the enormous power of a Biased Media to cut out the heart and will of the American public.��A truism worthy of note: ... Do not fear the enemy, for they can take only your life. Fear the media far more, for they will destroy your honor.�_____________________________________________

I SWEAR BY MY LIFE:

I used to jokingly say I am glad I don't live in the Middle East or Russia because I could get killed because of my big mouth.Now living in my own home country is just as dangerous. I could and may get killed for speaking my thoughts.YES, MY LIFE IS AT RISK EVERY TIME I SPEAK AGAINST AN ENEMY OF AMERICA. MY LIFE IS AT GREATER RISK EVERY TIME I FAIL TO SPEAK AGAINST AN ENEMY OF AMERICA!

Therese Daniels

Political leaders who advocate socialism do so because its gives them more power and opportunites to rip off the public. They have not one lick of care for its citizens.

Written by Therese Daniels

I Am the Flag of the United States of AMERICAI am the flag of the United States of America.My name is Old Glory.I fly atop the world’s tallest buildings.I stand watch in America’s halls of justice.I fly majestically over institutions of learning.I stand guard with power in the world.Look up and see me.I stand for peace, honor, truth and justice.I stand for freedom.I am confident.I am arrogant.I am proud.When I am flown with my fellow banners,My head is a little higher,My colors a little truer.I bow to no one!I am recognized all over the world.I am worshipped - I am saluted.I am loved - I am revered.I am respected - and I am feared.I have fought in every battle of every war for more then 200 years. I was flown at Valley Forge, Gettysburg, Shiloh and Appomattox.I was there at San Juan Hill, the trenches of France,in the Argonne Forest, Anzio, Rome and the beaches of Normandy.Guam, Okinawa, Korea and KheSan, Saigon, Vietnam know me.I’m presently in the mountains of Afganistan and the hot and dusty deserts of Iraq and wherever freedom is needed.I led my troops, I was dirty, battleworn and tired,But my soldiers cheered me and I was proud.I have been burned, torn and trampled on the streets of countries I have helped set free.It does not hurt for I am invincible.I have been soiled upon, burned, torn and trampled in the streets of my country.And when it’s done by those Whom I’ve served in battle - it hurts.But I shall overcome - for I am strong.I have slipped the bonds of Earth and stood watch over the uncharted frontiers of space from my vantage point on the moon.I have borne silent witness to all of America’s finest hours.But my finest hours are yet to come.When I am torn into strips and used as bandages for my wounded comrades on the battlefield,When I am flown at half-mast to honor my soldier,Or when I lie in the trembling arms of a grieving parentat the grave of their fallen son or daughter,I am proud.from Robert R. Loxahatchee, FL

Winston Churchill's comment on socialsim:

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the Gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill

DISCLAIMERS: The content of this blog presents draft and preliminary opinions and information, all of which is subject to change. It is intended to be strictly theoretical and hypothetical, in an effort to examine and vet the background, qualifications, and eligibility for U.S. President of a serious candidate and public figure who is standing for that office. Any assertions made on this blog are believed to be true based on good-faith efforts to research the facts related to a public figure. In the event that documentation deemed to be reliable by the author comes to the author's attention disproving assertions made on this blog, corrections will be published.Neither this blog nor its owner are responsible for the views and information published here by guest authors or commenters. It is widely understood that information on the Internet is by nature speculative and dynamic.

COPYRIGHT: All articles on this blog are protected by relevant copyright law. Nothing from this blog should be quoted, cited, copied, or otherwise used or shared in whole or part without the consent of the author. Nothing from this blog should be used in a way that misrepresents the author's meanings.