REAL PEOPLE, REAL ISSUES

1 post categorized "AVIATION"

April 25, 2008

WASHINGTON — The recent groundings of thousands of flights have raised
flags about skipped airplane inspections and botched repairs to wiring. But what really worries aviation specialists? Runway collisions.“Where we are most vulnerable at this moment is on the ground,” the chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, Mark V. Rosenker, said. “To me, this is the most dangerous aspect of flying.”For
the six-month period that ended March 30, there were 15 serious “runway
incursions,” compared with 8 in the period a year earlier. Another
occurred at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport on April 6 when a
tug operator pulling a Boeing 777 along a taxiway failed to stop at a runway as another plane was landing, missing the tug by about 25 feet.The
last airliner crash in the United States, a regional jet in Lexington,
Ky., in August 2006, was a runway incursion because the crew tried to
take off on the wrong runway.The problem — defined broadly as
the unauthorized presence of a plane, vehicle or pedestrian on a runway
— continues despite efforts by the Federal Aviation Administration and
airports to improve lighting and signs on the ground, to train pilots
and to identify intersections that are particularly problematic.Everyone agrees the number of incursions is too large.Runway
collisions are caused almost entirely by human error. But they are
still mostly preventable, because the risk could be substantially
reduced with existing technology, ranging from paint on the pavement to
electronic warning systems.Some of the more sophisticated electronic systems are commercially available, but are not required by the F.A.A.
And the most recent decision by the agency about a new generation of
equipment for navigation and surveillance appears to delay the
widespread adoption of in-cockpit warning technology by at least more
than a decade.Solving the runway incursion problem has been on
the National Transportation Safety Board’s “most wanted list” of safety
improvements since the list was created in 1990, and the board rates
the F.A.A.’s response as “unacceptable.” SOURCE: NYTIMES

September 2012

Comments Policy

The opinions expressed on the blog are the personal opinions of the posted respective blogger(s), and in no way reflect the opinions of KIRO blogspot and its affiliate social networks.

Comments Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged on this site, but there are some instances where comments will be edited or deleted as follows: Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam will be deleted. Including a link to relevant content is permitted, but comments should be relevant to the post topic. Comments including profanity will be deleted. Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive will be deleted.
Comments that attack a person individually will be deleted.
The owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice. This comment policy is subject to change at anytime.