Can't say I would make this move if I had Abreu, but I also can't say to veto this deal. Trumbo's 162-game averages are 30 HR / 100 RBI. If he's healthy next year and performs like he did the past few years, this deal isn't too far off.

There was definitely no collusion. The problem we are having now is that the manager has made poor trades in the past and the other managers in the league want the trade reversed. I agree that the trade is not that bad at all but having Abreu in a keeper league is an advantage. That being said the other team received a top notch fantasy pitcher with high K's and also a comparable power and RBI numbers with a lower BA.

I have my own analysis of the trade and will post it soon, but I dont want to sway anyones opinions before hand.

I need some third party analysis to bring to the managers at our season end and/or Winter Meetings to make the best decision for the league.

Help is always appreciated and thanks to those who have already put in the 2 or 3 cents.

We have a policy in our league if no collusion then trades go through. I probably would not have made the trade, but everyone views their team in different ways. Who am I to tell a manager how to run their team. If a trade is bad, then it is just like other decisions we make we learn from them and go on to next year. Just my thoughts.