'World Population Needs To Be Decreased By 50%'... Henry Kissinger

National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM 200)
A.K.A. "The Kissinger Report" (released internally late December of
1974) was crafted by globalist advisor, eugenicist, former Secretary of
State, and director of the National Security Council (NSC) during the Ford and Nixon era, Henry Kissinger. ~ Shepard Ambellas

This memorandum is one of many indicators that diabolic withering
potbelly globalists want a major portion of the world populace dead, and
are in the midst of exterminating humans incrementally, and have been
for some time.

The document (declassified in 1989) reads like a horror story.

"Part One" starts off with an analytical section mentioning, world
demographic trends, population problems,food supply issues and more —
then ends with details about the "World Population Conference" (a group
of diabolic oligarchs that decide our fate).

Item #3 in the "Executive Summary" states;

Because of the momentum of population dynamics,
reductions in birth rates affect total numbers only slowly. High birth
rates in the recent past have resulted in a high proportion m the
youngest age groups, so that there will continue to be substantial
population increases over many years even if a two-child family should
become the norm in the future.

Policies to reduce fertility will
have their main effects on total numbers only after several decades.
However, if future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it
is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made
effective in the 1970's and 1980's.

Moreover, programs started
now to reduce birth rates will have short run advantages for developing
countries in lowered demands on food, health and educational and other
services and in enlarged capacity to contribute to productive
investments, thus accelerating development.

The report moves proclaim that "they" (potbelly globalist oligarchs)
need to stabilize the population worldwide, showing world population
figures at the time of 1970 at 3.6 billion and projecting 12 billion by
2075.

The report also mentions the potential for famines in the future. Here is an excerpt from #6;

The most serious consequence for the short and middle
term is the possibility of massive famines in certain parts of the
world, especially the poorest regions.

Section #10 goes on to detail how the elite will profit less from having a larger number of people worldwide, stating;

Rapid population growth creates a severe drag on rates of
economic development otherwise attainable, sometimes to the point of
preventing any increase in per capita incomes.

In addition to the
overall impact on per capita incomes, rapid population growth seriously
affects a vast range of other aspects of the quality of life important
to social and economic progress in the LDCs.

And then there is the ultimatum (#23) — it reads as follows;

The central question for world population policy in the
year 1974, is whether mankind is to remain on a track toward an ultimate
population of 12 to 15 billion — implying a five to seven-fold increase
in almost all the underdeveloped world outside of China...

...or
whether (despite the momentum of population growth) it can be switched
over to the course of earliest feasible population stability — implying
ultimate totals of 8 to 9 billions and not more than a three or
four-fold increase in any major region.

WOW! — Did you get that?

Here are some of the policy recommendations mentioned in The Kissinger Report;

26. There is no single approach which will "solve" the
population problem. The complex social and economic factors involved
call for a comprehensive strategy with both bilateral and multilateral
elements. At the same time actions and programs must be tailored to
specific countries and groups. Above all, LDCs themselves must play the
most important role to achieve success.

27.Coordination among the bilateral donors and multilateral
organizations is vital to any effort to moderate population growth. Each
kind of effort will be needed for worldwide results.

28. World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate two major objectives:

(a) actions to accommodate continued population growth up to 6
billions by the mid-21st century without massive starvation or total
frustration of developmental hopes; and

(b) actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible
to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13
billions, or more.

29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state,
our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of
fertility, (a two- child family on the average), by about the year

2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline
to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000 compared to
the U.N medium projection, this goal would result in 500 million fewer
people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050.

Attainment of this
goal will require greatly intensified population programs. A basis for
developing national population growth control targets to achieve this
world target is contained in the World Population Plan of Action.

30. The World Population Plan of Action is not self-enforcing
and will require vigorous efforts by interested countries, U.N.
agencies and other international bodies to make it effective. U.S.
leadership is essential. The strategy must include the following
elements and actions:

Concentration on key countries.

(a) Assistance for population moderation should give primary
emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where
there is special U.S. political and strategic interest.

Together, they account for 47 percent of the world's current population
increase. (It should be recognized that at present AID bilateral
assistance to some of these countries may not be acceptable.)

Bilateral
assistance, to the extent that funds are available, will be given to
other countries, considering such factors as population growth, need for
external assistance, long-term U.S. interests and willingness to engage
in self help.

Multilateral programs must necessarily have a wider
coverage and the bilateral programs of other national donors will be
shaped to their particular interests. At the same time, the U.S. will
look to the multilateral agencies, especially the U.N. Fund for
Population Activities which already has projects in over 80 countries to
increase population assistance on a broader basis with increased U.S.
contributions.

This is desirable in terms of U.S. interests and
necessary in political terms in the United Nations. But progress
nevertheless, must be made in the key 13 and our limited resources
should give major emphasis to them.

(b) Integration of population factors and population programs into
country development planning. As called for the world Population Plan of
Action, developing countries and those aiding them should specifically
take population factors into account in national planning and include
population programs in such plans.

(c) Increased assistance for family planning services, information
and technology. This is a vital aspect of any world population program.
1) Family planning information and materials based on present technology
should be made fully available as rapidly as possible to the 85 % of
the populations in key LDCs not now reached, essentially rural poor who
have the highest fertility.

2) Fundamental and evelopmental research should be expanded, aimed at
simple, low-cost, effective, safe, long-lasting and acceptable methods
of fertility control. Support by all federal agencies for biomedical
research in this field should be increased by $60 million annually.

(d) Creating conditions conducive to fertility decline. For its own
merits and consistent with the recommendations of the World Population
Plan of Action, priority should be given in the general aid program to
selective development policies in sectors offering the greatest promise
of increased motivation for smaller family size.

In many cases pilot
programs and experimental research will be needed as guidance for later
efforts on a larger scale. The preferential sectors include:

* Expanding wage employment, especially for women; — Developing alternatives to children as a source of old age security;

* Increasing income of the poorest, especially in rural areas, including providing privately owned farms;

* Education of new generations on the desirability of smaller families.

While AID has information on the relative importance of the new major
socio- economic factors that lead to lower birth rates, much more
research and experimentation need to be done to determine what cost
effective programs and policy will lead to lower birth rates.

(e) Food and agricultural assistance is vital for any population
sensitive development strategy. The provision of adequate food stocks
for a growing population in times of shortage is crucial.

Without such a
program for the LDCs there is considerable chance that such shortage
will lead to conflict and adversely affect population goals and
developmental efforts. Specific recommendations are included in Section
IV (c) of this study.

(f) Development of a worldwide political and popular commitment to
population stabilization is fundamental to any effective strategy. This
requires the support and commitment of key LDC leaders.

This will only
take place if they clearly see the negative impact of unrestricted
population growth and believe it is possible to deal with this question
through governmental action.

The U.S. should encourage LDC leaders to take the lead in advancing
family planning and population stabilization both within multilateral
organizations and through bilateral contacts with other LDCs.

This will
require that the President and the Secretary of State treat the subject
of population growth control as a matter of paramount importance and
address it specifically in their regular contacts with leaders of other
governments, particularly LDCs.

31. The World Population Plan of Action and the resolutions adopted
by consensus by 137 nations at the August 1974 U.N. World Population
Conference, though not ideal, provide an excellent framework for
developing a worldwide system of population/ family planning programs.

We should use them to generate U.N. agency and national leadership for
an all-out effort to lower growth rates. Constructive action by the U.S.
will further our objectives. To this end we should:

(a) Strongly support the World Population Plan of Action and the
adoption of its appropriate provisions in national and other programs.

(b) Urge the adoption by national programs of
specific population goals including replacement levels of fertility for
DCs and LDCs by 2000.

(c) After suitable preparation in the U.S., announce a U.S. goal to
maintain our present national average fertility no higher than
replacement level and attain near stability by 2000.

(d) Initiate an international cooperative strategy of national
research programs on human reproduction and fertility control covering
biomedical and socio-economic factors, as proposed by the U.S.
Delegation at Bucharest.

(e) Act on our offer at Bucharest to collaborate with other
interested donors and U.N. agencies to aid selected countries to develop
low cost preventive health and family planning services.

(f) Work directly with donor countries and through the U.N.Fund for
Population Activities and the OECD/DAC to increase bilateral and
multilateral assistance for population programs.

32. As measures to increase understanding of population factors by
LDC leaders and to strengthen population planning in national
development plans, we should carry out the recommendations in Part II,
Section VI, including:

(a) Consideration of population factors and
population policies in all Country Assistance Strategy Papers (CASP) and
Development Assistance Program (DAP) multi-year strategy papers.

(b) Prepare projections of population growth individualized for
countries with analyses of development of each country and discuss them
with national leaders.

(c) Provide for greatly increased training programs for senior officials of LDCs in the elements of demographic economics.

(d) Arrange for familiarization programs at U.N. Headquarters in New
York for ministers of governments, senior policy level officials and
comparably influential leaders from private life.

(e) Assure assistance to LDC leaders in integrating population
factors in national plans, particularly as they relate to health
services, education, agricultural resources and development, employment,
equitable distribution of income and social stability.

(f) Also assure assistance to LDC leaders in relating population
policies and family planning programs to major sectors of development
health, nutrition, agriculture, education, social services, organized
labour, women's activities, and community development.

(g) Undertake initiatives to implement the Percy Amendment regarding improvement in the status of women.

(h) Give emphasis in assistance to programs on development of rural areas.

Beyond these activities which are essentially directed at national
interests, we must assure that a broader educational concept is
developed to convey an acute understanding to national leaders of the
interrelation of national interests and world population growth.

33. We must take care that our activities should not give the
appearance to the LDCs of an industrialized country policy directed
against the LDCs. Caution must be taken that in any approaches in this
field we support in the LDCs are ones we can support within this
country.

"Third World" leaders should be in the forefront and obtain the
credit for successful programs. In this context it is important to
demonstrate to LDC leaders that such family planning programs have
worked and can work within a reasonable period of time.

34. To help assure others of our intentions we should indicate our
emphasis on the right of individuals and couples to determine freely and
responsibly the number and spacing of their children and to have
information, education and means to do so, and our continued interest in
improving the overall general welfare.

We should use the authority
provided by the World Population Plan of Action to advance the
principles that:

1) responsibility in parenthood includes responsibility
to the children and the community and

2) that nations in exercising
their sovereignty to set population policies should take into account
the welfare of their neighbours and the world. To strengthen the worldwide approach, family planning
programs should be supported by multilateral organizations wherever they
can provide the most efficient means.

35. To support such family planning and related development
assistance efforts there is need to increase public and leadership
information in this field. We recommend increased emphasis on mass
media, newer communications technology and other population education
and motivation programs by the UN and USIA. Higher priority should be
given to these information programs in this field worldwide.

36. In order to provide the necessary resources and leadership,
support by the U.S. public and Congress will be necessary. A significant
amount of funds will be required for a number of years. High level
personal contact by the Secretary of State and other officials on the
subject at an early date with Congressional counterparts is needed. A
program for this purpose should be developed by OES with H and AID.

37. There is an alternative view which holds that a growing number of
experts believe that the population situation is already more serious
and less amenable to solution through voluntary measures than is
generally accepted.

It holds that, to prevent even more widespread food
shortage and other demographic catastrophes than are generally
anticipated, even stronger measures are required and some fundamental,
very difficult moral issues need to be addressed.

These include, for
example, our own consumption patterns, mandatory programs, tight control
of our food resources. In view of the seriousness of these issues,
explicit consideration of them should begin in the Executive Branch, the
Congress and the U.N. soon. (See the end of Section I for this
viewpoint.)

38. Implementing the actions discussed above (in paragraphs 1-36),
will require a significant expansion in AID funds for population/family
planning. A number of major actions in the area of creating conditions
for fertility decline can be funded from resources available to the
sectors in question (e.g., education, agriculture).

Other actions,
including family planning services, research and experimental activities
on factors effecting fertility, come under population funds. We
recommend increases in AID budget requests to the Congress on the order
of $35-50 million annually through FY 1980 (above the $137.5 million
requested for FY 1975).

This funding would cover both bilateral programs
and contributions to multilateral organizations. However, the level of
funds needed in the future could change significantly, depending on such
factors as major breakthroughs in fertility control technologies and
LDC receptivities to population assistance.

To help develop, monitor,
and evaluate the expanded actions discussed above, AID is likely to need
additional direct hire personnel in the population/family planning
area.

As a corollary to expanded AID funding levels for population,
efforts must be made to encourage increased contributions by other
donors and recipient countries to help reduce rapid population growth.

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go HERE. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.