What Is a Subprime Unicorn?

Christopher Mims had an article in the Wall Street Journal recently titled “The Dangers Ahead if Tech Unicorns Get Gored.” In his article, Mr. Mims discusses the potential collateral damage of a failed unicorn. The article is thought provoking and includes two quotes that highlight aspects of venture capital that are important to understand. Venture capitalist and Stanford Professor Heidi Roizen is quoted as saying “Venture capital is not free money. It’s debt.” And Michael Moritz of Sequoia Capital is quoted as calling many unicorns “subprime.”

Venture Capital as Debt?

Looking at venture capital as “debt” is worthwhile for any entrepreneur, as doing so may prevent misconceptions as to how preferred equity works.

Most notably, preferred equity has a liquidation preference — when the portfolio company is sold, the VC’s investment money is returned first (like a repayment of principal)

The liquidation preference often comes with accrued dividends (like payment of interest)

VC’s typically receive a set of control rights (like covenants are provided to lenders)

Preferred equity typically has a redemption feature, so that the shares must be redeemed after five to seven years (like a loan has a maturity date)

We’ve reviewed the potential effects of liquidation preferences in prior posts. The key to understanding the potential impact of VC terms is to model out a few “waterfalls” – spreadsheets that illustrate the flow and allocation of funds in a sale transaction.

Subprime Unicorns?

Continuing the debt analysis and considering how such debt could be “subprime” is a useful consideration for entrepreneurs and investors alike.

“Unicorn” and “subprime” are seemingly contradictory terms. Unicorns are start-up companies that have been successful in commanding a valuation above $1 billion. But at their lofty valuation, there may be increased risk that the valuation does not hold up. If it doesn’t, the debt-like features of a VC’s investment may take center stage (like aggressive lending terms in a subprime loan). The liquidation preference may be the VC’s predominant or only source of return. And the founders may find their return, if any, subordinate to several layers of liquidation preferences that are tied to significant rounds of investment. In both cases, neither constituency is happy.

Questioning the quality of VC investment in unicorns may prove to be prescient. And as Mr. Mims explores, the consequences of a failed unicorn may be far reaching. But for now, simply understanding how a headline grabbing VC investment could be likened to subprime debt offers valuable insight into how VC investments are structured.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney.
This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary.
The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites.
In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.