If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

New health care is good economics

This study was just published by the Colorado Trust, a non partisan Health foundation.
ABSTRACT
The Future of Colorado Health Care: An Economic Analysis of Health Care Reform and the Impact on Colorado’s Economy projected that health care cost growth will be between 5.5% and 17% lower in Colorado than it would have been without reform. This translates into premiums for employer-sponsored insurance in 2019 that are between 10% and 25% lower due to lower overall cost growth. This means that families and businesses in Colorado could expect premiums for employer-sponsored insurance to be $1,962 less per year for individual coverage and $3,917 less per year for family coverage in 2019 than they would have been without federal health care reform.
The study also projects that increasing health insurance coverage in Colorado will spur increased economic activity and create more jobs, even after accounting for the costs of financing reform. In 2019, state economic output should be nearly 1% higher than it would be without reform and there will be roughly 19,000 new jobs as a result of the coverage expansion.
Key reasons for these savings include: EXPAND COVERAGE AND LOWER UNCOMPENSATED CARE COSTS. It is estimated that uncompensated care would have cost Coloradans $1.8 billion dollars in 2019 without federal health care reform. The ACA calls for expanded coverage, equalization of Medicaid reimbursement levels and for private payers to hold down their cost increases.
MAKE THE MEDICAL SYSTEM MORE EFFICIENT. The ACA encourages health system reforms such as paying health care providers for value rather than for volume and the expansion of programs like medical homes, accountable care organizations and health information technology.
INCREASE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND NEW JOBS. As more Coloradans obtain health insurance and seek medical care, there will be an increased demand for health care workers. In turn, this increased demand will lead to more health care-related job opportunities in Colorado, resulting in more individuals with disposable income to buy other consumer goods from Colorado businesses.
IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY WITH IMPROVED HEALTH. The economic losses from the uninsured are between $1.82 billion and $3.87 billion in Colorado per year.1 At least some of this value could be recouped through healthier, more productive workers who would earn more income and thereby increase the state’s tax base.

Thought some of you basher of the new health care might like Colorado research facts.

This is what he was all about!:
Vinny last hunting year
53 pheasants in South Dakota 200 + ducks in Idaho
Lasting memories Vinny was 13+ years old!

Thought some of you basher of the new health care might like Colorado research facts.

Regardless of good intentions, positive economic impact etc, the real fact, not research, is that an unconstitutional law is void.

"It's not that government is inherently stupid, although that's a debatable question."
Rand Paul CPAC speech 2011

I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1791
________________________________________
Proud partner of (HR) WR SR Brian's 44Magnum Monster
co-owned by HR Rianne's 2nd Chance Hurricane Rebel

This study was just published by the Colorado Trust, a non partisan Health foundation.

Non partisan? Who hired them? Sounds like a bunch of rosy projections cooked up as PR to me.

Thought some of you basher of the new health care might like Colorado research facts.

Since when did projected figures and assumptions that all fraud will disappear in 8 years become "research facts"? I'd call this entire abstract a hypothesis, and a not-very-realistic one at that. The same liberals that probably imposed these "reforms" on the citizenry probably dangled a lucrative grant to some of their liberal pals to come up with that biased report. :::::eyeroll::::::::

Regardless of good intentions, positive economic impact etc, the real fact, not research, is that an unconstitutional law is void.

I understand that only part of the bill was "found" uncosnstitunal. You might want to check that out. Also you can research more about the Colorado Trust @ www.coloradotrust.org rather than "shoot" from your biasis opinion on every thing!

This is what he was all about!:
Vinny last hunting year
53 pheasants in South Dakota 200 + ducks in Idaho
Lasting memories Vinny was 13+ years old!

Non partisan? Who hired them? Sounds like a bunch of rosy projections cooked up as PR to me.

Since when did projected figures and assumptions that all fraud will disappear in 8 years become "research facts"? I'd call this entire abstract a hypothesis, and a not-very-realistic one at that. The same liberals that probably imposed these "reforms" on the citizenry probably dangled a lucrative grant to some of their liberal pals to come up with that biased report. :::::eyeroll::::::::

Some where I missed your crenditials as a health economist!
Everything and every one who does not see the world as you see it must be wrong. Buy the way is Ducks Unlimited also wrong about their predictions?

This is what he was all about!:
Vinny last hunting year
53 pheasants in South Dakota 200 + ducks in Idaho
Lasting memories Vinny was 13+ years old!

Non partisan? Who hired them? Sounds like a bunch of rosy projections cooked up as PR to me.

Since when did projected figures and assumptions that all fraud will disappear in 8 years become "research facts"? I'd call this entire abstract a hypothesis, and a not-very-realistic one at that. The same liberals that probably imposed these "reforms" on the citizenry probably dangled a lucrative grant to some of their liberal pals to come up with that biased report. :::::eyeroll::::::::

Actually, I sort of agree with you on that. It reminds me a lot of another prediction that abjectly failed to live up to its promise:

Tax cuts for the richest Americans will stimulate the economy and create job growth!

Colorado moves forward on health care: Our governor Owens (very conservate Republican) had established a blue ribbon pannel to study Colorado's health care issues. He was far right and from Colorado Springs (and believe me very right of center) The pannels findings support much of the federal plan as need in Colorado. Below is a recent articel in the Springs paper .
BARA COTTER
The Gazette
A federal judge’s ruling in January that the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional was enough to convince the governor of Alaska that he would have no part of the controversial health care reform law.

“The state of Alaska will not pursue unlawful activity to implement a federal health care regime that has been declared unconstitutional by a federal court,” Gov. Sean Parnell announced last week.

Don’t expect the same response in Colorado. With a boost from federal grants, the state has been steadily moving ahead on health care reform, and there are no plans to stop, even though Colorado and Alaska were party to the legal challenge in Florida.

“It’s the federal law, and until it’s changed, it’s our duty to implement it,” says Lorez Meinhold, director of health reform implementation for the governor’s office. “It’s not like the court decision in Florida is the final word. It’s destined to be appealed to the higher court.”

Already, Meinhold says, the law has had what she called “real benefits” in Colorado. Since July, more than 600 long-term uninsured Coloradans with pre-existing conditions have gotten coverage through a federal high-risk pool, and there are projections that up to 4,000 people in the state will eventually be part of the GettingUSCovered program.

Colorado received a $90 million grant to fund GettingUSCovered, which also receives money through member premiums that, in El Paso County, can range from $116 a month for a young nonsmoker to $642 a month for a smoker age 65 or older.

“It’s not cheap, but for folks who need insurance, they can now obtain it,” Meinhold says.

GettingUSCovered is considered a “bridge” program that will run through Dec. 31, 2013. After that, assuming the law is upheld after its inevitable trip to the U.S. Supreme Court, the health care reform law will allow people with pre-existing conditions to purchase coverage through health insurance exchanges, described as a virtual marketplace where individuals and small businesses will be able to easily compare plans offered by participating insurers and pick one that’s best for them. The exchanges also will be an avenue for people to get subsidies for premiums, if they qualify based on their income.

Other work that’s underway in Colorado includes:

• Planning for the state’s health insurance exchange. A federal grant of about $1 million is being used to pay for consultants, statewide community outreach meetings and data analysis to determine who might use the exchange and how it should work, says Joan Henneberry, director of health insurance exchange for the state. A data advisory work group is already meeting, and another that will enlist small employers to address their needs is being formed.
Officials also are working with lawmakers on enabling legislation to create an organization to run the exchange.
“We have two years to build what is essentially a start-up company that creates this marketplace for consumers to come,” Henneberry says. “In the next two years, we have to do everything that any other small business would do: develop operations plans, work out functions, IT and infrastructure, build a budget.”

• Enhancement of insurance rate oversight. The state Division of Insurance received a $1 million federal grant to review insurance rates, oversee premium increases and take action against insurers who are going after “unreasonable” rate hikes. “It ensures that increases are justified,” Meinhold says.

• Participation in the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program. The Affordable Care Act created the program to help employers and unions maintain coverage for retirees who are at least 55 years old but not yet eligible for Medicare. The program has about $5 billion available to reimburse participating employers and unions for medical claims for early retirees, their spouses and their dependents. The reimbursements can be used to reduce employer health care costs, lower premiums for the retirees, or both. Meinhold says about 40 employers and unions in Colorado have been accepted into the program, including El Paso County, with about 5,000 participants nationwide.

Meinhold says the state also has received a grant to figure out how to add more primary care doctors, physicians’ assistants and other front-line providers to the workforce.

“I think we have seen positive impacts in the state,” Meinhold says.

County officials also are being brought into discussions on implementation of the new law to ensure that “what we do moves Colorado forward,” Meinhold says. “We see counties as our partners.”

Even as Meinhold and Henneberry plow ahead with health care reform, the Colorado Attorney General’s office is continuing to fight it, but isn’t ready to go to the mat over the Florida judge’s ruling.

“Basically, the federal government still has time to appeal the ruling and get a stay, so we’re still in that period of time right now, so there’s no contradiction in what Colorado is doing and the judge’s order,” says Mike Saccone, spokesman for the attorney general’s office. “If the federal government declines to appeal, the there could be an issue with Colorado implementing the health care reform law.”

But with three federal judges ruling in favor of the law and two against so far, almost everyone expects the law to eventually wend its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the meantime, Meinhold and Henneberry say, Colorado needs to press on with health care reform.

“I’d say most states feel we should proceed with our planning until we’re told otherwise,” Henneberry says. “We don’t think it’s wise to just bring everything to a screeching halt and then get a year behind.”

Henneberry also says the people who attended the 10 community meetings held across the state last year were in favor of having the state in charge of its exchange. States that don’t create their own face the prospect of the federal government stepping in and doing it for them.

“We do not want to default to the federal government and have them do this for us,” Henneberry says.

And should the U.S. Supreme Court strike down all or parts of the law?

“There’s a lot we can continue to do, even without the federal law,” Henneberry says, “but without the federal financing, it will be hard to cover all our uninsured, and we’ve heard loud and clear in Colorado that people expect us to do something about the uninsured.”

State officials working to implement the new law say that more than 500,000 uninsured Coloradans will get coverage when it’s in full effect in 2014.

Colorado moves forward on health care: Our governor Owens (very conservate Republican) had established a blue ribbon pannel to study Colorado's health care issues. He was far right and from Colorado Springs (and believe me very right of center) The pannels findings support much of the federal plan as need in Colorado. Below is a recent articel in the Springs paper .
BARA COTTER
The Gazette
A federal judge’s ruling in January that the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional was enough to convince the governor of Alaska that he would have no part of the controversial health care reform law.

“The state of Alaska will not pursue unlawful activity to implement a federal health care regime that has been declared unconstitutional by a federal court,” Gov. Sean Parnell announced last week.

Don’t expect the same response in Colorado. With a boost from federal grants, the state has been steadily moving ahead on health care reform, and there are no plans to stop, even though Colorado and Alaska were party to the legal challenge in Florida.

“It’s the federal law, and until it’s changed, it’s our duty to implement it,” says Lorez Meinhold, director of health reform implementation for the governor’s office. “It’s not like the court decision in Florida is the final word. It’s destined to be appealed to the higher court.”

Already, Meinhold says, the law has had what she called “real benefits” in Colorado. Since July, more than 600 long-term uninsured Coloradans with pre-existing conditions have gotten coverage through a federal high-risk pool, and there are projections that up to 4,000 people in the state will eventually be part of the GettingUSCovered program.

Colorado received a $90 million grant to fund GettingUSCovered, which also receives money through member premiums that, in El Paso County, can range from $116 a month for a young nonsmoker to $642 a month for a smoker age 65 or older.

“It’s not cheap, but for folks who need insurance, they can now obtain it,” Meinhold says.

GettingUSCovered is considered a “bridge” program that will run through Dec. 31, 2013. After that, assuming the law is upheld after its inevitable trip to the U.S. Supreme Court, the health care reform law will allow people with pre-existing conditions to purchase coverage through health insurance exchanges, described as a virtual marketplace where individuals and small businesses will be able to easily compare plans offered by participating insurers and pick one that’s best for them. The exchanges also will be an avenue for people to get subsidies for premiums, if they qualify based on their income.

Other work that’s underway in Colorado includes:

• Planning for the state’s health insurance exchange. A federal grant of about $1 million is being used to pay for consultants, statewide community outreach meetings and data analysis to determine who might use the exchange and how it should work, says Joan Henneberry, director of health insurance exchange for the state. A data advisory work group is already meeting, and another that will enlist small employers to address their needs is being formed.
Officials also are working with lawmakers on enabling legislation to create an organization to run the exchange.
“We have two years to build what is essentially a start-up company that creates this marketplace for consumers to come,” Henneberry says. “In the next two years, we have to do everything that any other small business would do: develop operations plans, work out functions, IT and infrastructure, build a budget.”

• Enhancement of insurance rate oversight. The state Division of Insurance received a $1 million federal grant to review insurance rates, oversee premium increases and take action against insurers who are going after “unreasonable” rate hikes. “It ensures that increases are justified,” Meinhold says.

• Participation in the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program. The Affordable Care Act created the program to help employers and unions maintain coverage for retirees who are at least 55 years old but not yet eligible for Medicare. The program has about $5 billion available to reimburse participating employers and unions for medical claims for early retirees, their spouses and their dependents. The reimbursements can be used to reduce employer health care costs, lower premiums for the retirees, or both. Meinhold says about 40 employers and unions in Colorado have been accepted into the program, including El Paso County, with about 5,000 participants nationwide.

Meinhold says the state also has received a grant to figure out how to add more primary care doctors, physicians’ assistants and other front-line providers to the workforce.

“I think we have seen positive impacts in the state,” Meinhold says.

County officials also are being brought into discussions on implementation of the new law to ensure that “what we do moves Colorado forward,” Meinhold says. “We see counties as our partners.”

Even as Meinhold and Henneberry plow ahead with health care reform, the Colorado Attorney General’s office is continuing to fight it, but isn’t ready to go to the mat over the Florida judge’s ruling.

“Basically, the federal government still has time to appeal the ruling and get a stay, so we’re still in that period of time right now, so there’s no contradiction in what Colorado is doing and the judge’s order,” says Mike Saccone, spokesman for the attorney general’s office. “If the federal government declines to appeal, the there could be an issue with Colorado implementing the health care reform law.”

But with three federal judges ruling in favor of the law and two against so far, almost everyone expects the law to eventually wend its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the meantime, Meinhold and Henneberry say, Colorado needs to press on with health care reform.

“I’d say most states feel we should proceed with our planning until we’re told otherwise,” Henneberry says. “We don’t think it’s wise to just bring everything to a screeching halt and then get a year behind.”

Henneberry also says the people who attended the 10 community meetings held across the state last year were in favor of having the state in charge of its exchange. States that don’t create their own face the prospect of the federal government stepping in and doing it for them.

“We do not want to default to the federal government and have them do this for us,” Henneberry says.

And should the U.S. Supreme Court strike down all or parts of the law?

“There’s a lot we can continue to do, even without the federal law,” Henneberry says, “but without the federal financing, it will be hard to cover all our uninsured, and we’ve heard loud and clear in Colorado that people expect us to do something about the uninsured.”

State officials working to implement the new law say that more than 500,000 uninsured Coloradans will get coverage when it’s in full effect in 2014.

Did you ever wonder where all this federal money comes from. Tell your story to all those who had their health insurance premiums go up as much as 30% last year. Do you think that when the federal Gov. put 15 million more people on medicaid immediately after passage of the bill (they will now pay nothing for all treatment and those insured will have to make up the cost) might be the reason for such an increase in premiums?

You have been paying for them for years! Cost shifting by the health care industry is alive and well.
Those that can have been paying for the cost of health care at least after WWII.
How much profit did your health insurance company have the last 5-10 years?

This is what he was all about!:
Vinny last hunting year
53 pheasants in South Dakota 200 + ducks in Idaho
Lasting memories Vinny was 13+ years old!

Some where I missed your crenditials as a health economist!
Everything and every one who does not see the world as you see it must be wrong. Buy the way is Ducks Unlimited also wrong about their predictions?

Where did I say I was a health care economist? I simply pointed out that just because someone puts in writing a bunch of rosy projections and hypothetical numbers for what things might be like 8 years down the road doesn't exactly meet my idea of factual. I'd probably feel the same way if DU published a study of projected habitat gain 8 years in the future. However, if said study was commissioned in order to solicit donations for purchasing said habitat, I'd understand why it was done. Gnome sane?