I really don't care about the 'Crotch-Shot'! <br>...since I already have the Neat-O 'ACTION FIGURE'!<br><br><br><br><br>[color:green]"...or am I a butterfly that's dreaming she's a woman?"</font color=green>

...but seriously...<br><br>I saw the Downing Street Memo Meeting. I watched them <br>discussing how Bush Mugged for "His Base" laughing out <br>loud as he pretended to look in a cabinet and peek under <br>the desk "Nope! No WoMD HERE!" (HAR HAR HAR)<br><br>The speaker said; "I can tell you who wasn't laughing<br>CINDY SHEEHAN wasn't laughing... and neither were other<br>parents that have lost their children...."<br><br>Cindy Sheehan was Just ONE of the Speakers at <br>the Downing Street Memo Hearing ...along with <br>Ambassador Joe Wilson... <--remember him?<br><br><br>I'd never heard of either of them up until I watched <br>(and recorded) them on C-SPAN 3 that afternoon, when <br>"THEY" were counting on No One Watching!<br><br>BroadCast at 3PM, from a cloakroom-sized room in the <br>BASEMENT of the Capitol Building, ...scheduled concurrently <br>with at least 10 MAJOR Voting issues, to force the speakers <br>and listeners to either miss the voting, ...OR TO MISS THE <br>MEETING ALTOGETHER! ..and still they came...<br><br>'The RULING CLASS' did everything, short of lob a grenade<br>into the room to stop this story from getting out...and you're <br>telling me that you're not the SLIGHTEST BIT INTERESTED <br>in what the Republicans were so damned desperate for you <br>NEVER TO HEAR?????<br><br>Available as both QT Streaming & .MP3 Download<br><br>[color:green]John Conyers' Downing St...lor=red> <br><br>If you're tired of "Hear-Say" concerning [color:red]the hearing</font color=red><br> .....here's your last chance to hear it for yourself.<br><br>News sources, since the hearing, have repeatedly <br>attempted to downplay both the number & credentials <br>of the people involved with the meeting. Trying to make <br>it seem like it was a single dissatisfied Congressmen & <br>a handful of "Bush-Hating Liberal "Fringe Wack-Os".<br><br>Their Credentials are ASTOUNDING! Among them were <br>former CIA Agent Ray McGoverin, CIA Analyst & Former<br>Ambassador Joe Wilson, and the Congressional Lawyer <br>John Bonafaz. ...and yes, Cindy Sheehan.<br><br>123 Members of the House of Representatives signed the<br>Petition, armed with 56,000 signatures (including mine) <br>requesting an accounting for the questionable intelligence <br>that lead to the preemptive strike against a sovereign <br>country, on the strength of what certainly amounts to a lie.<br><br>Since then, many more people have gotten on board, as<br> the scales fall away from their eyes, and they are finding <br>that not only did 'the Emperor Have No Brain', but he <br>ALSO didn't have a Leg to Stand On when he used his <br>OWN Brand of 'TERRER' to convince Congress & The <br>American People to go to WAR.<br><br>Outting Valerie, shutting down the branch of the CIA that<br>searches for WoMD, the ongoing Saga of Karl Rove, and<br>MOST ESPECIALLY The DOWNING STREET MEMO are ALL<br>one story, and ALL Lead STRAIGHT TO THE TOP!<br><br>If You're on BroadBand, PLEASE Take the Time to download<br>the Streaming Version and listen as you surf, or on your iPod<br>or whatever, instead of your iTunes. I PROMISE, ...not only<br>will it be Music To Your Ears ....but a real eye opener as well.<br><br><br>[color:green]"...or am I a butterfly that's dreaming she's a woman?"</font color=green>

Not to change the focus of this unbelievably interesting thread about the burning issue of Aunt Gertrude's letter to Drudge but didn't the dude with the cockeyed goggles play a bit part in "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"?<br><br><br><br>Or in that Ferris Bueller movie? He looks so familiar. Looks like he was smoking a doobie on the poop deck before GW arrived.<br><br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>I watched that on TV and he WAS reading a Prepared statement- the part you posted... <br>maybe he answeredd a few questions later but that part he was reading...<p><hr></blockquote><p>No Dave, the part I posted, where he mentioned Cindy Sheehan, was after his prepared remarks. It was during Q&A with reporters. Your first clue is when Bush says "Yes Steve." You know, 'cause, right in the middle of his prepared remarks, Bush often just stops and calls on reporters. Matter of fact, he does this quite often during State of the Union Addresses. <br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>he didn't seem very sincere either<p><hr></blockquote><p>Oh yes Dave, that's right. Bush was dancing an irish jig while answering the reporters question. <br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p> a SERIOUS matter and he's cracking smirks and smiles<p><hr></blockquote><p>And during the part where he was talking about Cindy Sheehan, he told two jokes and farted twice. <br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>I was shocked Rummy and Rice (standing behind him) weren't physically holding him up, and holding his hand.<p><hr></blockquote><p>What?<br><br>* * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>I [censored] bigger than you.<br>

It's also available directly from cspan as a realmedia stream. Here's the rtsp<br><br>rtsp://cspanrm.fplive.net/cspan/project/iraq/iraq061605_downing.rm<br><br>or you can access it from my personal page (along with a lot of other content, including many docs.)<br><br>http://personal.nbnet.nb.ca/sveniot/indexa.html<br><br>BTW, if it comes from Matt Drudge, then it is worth nothing.<br><br><br>BushCulters would do better to go on diets and enlist.<br><br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>I don't find any comfort in your assertions that the President isn't briefed and prepped on the major issues (front page of many major papers) before going in front of the press corp. I have a hard time believing that's true.<p><hr></blockquote><p>Of course he is briefed. I never said he wasn't. But you're asserting that Bush's answer to the reporter's question was "prepared and rehearsed." Alluding that Bush was less than sincere when answering the question. <br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Being briefed by your staff before a press conference is not a conspiracy<p><hr></blockquote><p>I never said it was. I was mocking your petty criticisms of "prepared and rehearsed." <br><br>* * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>I [censored] bigger than you.<br>

<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Not to change the focus of this unbelievably interesting thread about the burning issue of Aunt Gertrude's letter to Drudge but didn't the dude with the cockeyed goggles play a bit part in "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"?<p><hr></blockquote><p>No, Fast Times at Ridgemont High was shot in 1982. Even if guy in the cockeyed goggles were 25, that would've put him at 4 years of age. I guess there could've been a small child in the background during some of the Mall shots. <br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr><p>Or in that Ferris Bueller movie?<p><hr></blockquote><p><br>That was four years later, in 1986. He'd be 8 years old. Maybe he was that kid near the end of the movie, when Bueller ran through the house. <br><br>* * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>I [censored] bigger than you.<br>

<br>Thank You! Good Links!<br><br>The one thing that would have been devastating to PBS<br>is if the Neo-CONS were able to shut-down the BBC News!<br><br>I see a time where, we the people, will be huddled around<br>contraband radios, (a la 'RadioFreeEurope') during the <br>Cold War, seeking for news other than Govt. Propaganda. <br><br><br><br>[color:green]"...or am I a butterfly that's dreaming she's a woman?"</font color=green>

He could be a stoned out 35 yo reservist who thought he was home free but someone dragged him onto this carrier for a year. I would be smoking the big spleef too if someone did that to me. Especially if the guy who did it was standing in front of me wagging an enormous padded crotch at the cameras.<br><br>Then he would be 14 in Fast Times. But you also could be right and the guy on the carrier is a love child created during Fast Times.<br><br><br><br><br><br>

Xplain's use of MacNews, AppleCentral and AppleExpo are not affiliated with Apple, Inc. MacTech is a registered trademark of Xplain Corporation. AppleCentral, MacNews, Xplain, "The journal of Apple technology", Apple Expo, Explain It, MacDev, MacDev-1, THINK Reference, NetProfessional, MacTech Central, MacTech Domains, MacForge, and the MacTutorMan are trademarks or service marks of Xplain Corp. Sprocket is a registered trademark of eSprocket Corp. Other trademarks and copyrights appearing in this printing or software remain the property of their respective holders.

All contents are Copyright 1984-2010 by Xplain Corporation. All rights reserved. Theme designed by Icreon.