Given that modern Cosmology has taken
a wrong turn decades ago and rejected a well-supported electrical
model; and given that it has gone off into "modern mythology"
with the "big bang", "black holes", dark matter and dark energy,
please consider taking the time to look up your local newspaper
Science Editor and send him your personalized version of the
following:

A
Letter to Newspaper Science Editors:

____date____Dear
(___name of science editor____):

I’m writing to ask
that (____name of newspaper____) provide in-depth coverage of the
considerable and growing challenge that is now being presented to
“Big Bang” gravity-oriented cosmology.

Astronomer Halton
Arp, supported by a growing number of scientists, has
falsified the redshift = distance equation that is a
foundational concept of the “Big Bang”/expanding universe theory. Arp’s
revolutionary discovery should have caused a fundamental rethinking
of the “Big Bang.” See:

Instead, as
Riccardo Scarpa of the European Southern Observatory in Santiago,
Chile, has astutely observed: "Every time the basic big bang
model has failed to predict what we see, the solution has been to
bolt on something new - inflation, dark matter and dark energy".
Strangely, the lofty pronouncements about the Big Bang have almost
become quasi-religious beliefs, to the detriment of scientific
objectivity.

Because Big Bang
cosmology dominates astrophysical thinking, the news media sometimes
overlook new developments in space. Today, in the wake of recent
discoveries, a new way of seeing the physical universe is emerging.
The Big Bang is being challenged by Electric Universe/Plasma
Cosmology, which emphasizes that plasma and electricity play greater
roles than gravity in celestial dynamics. Scientists now doing
Electric Universe/Electric Plasma research do not presume to know
the origin of the universe, and they do not deduce its present
workings from such assumptions.

Exciting data returned by high-powered telescopes showing immense
plasma structures and recent space probes are challenging
astronomers' long-standing assumptions about galaxies and their
constituent stars, about the evolution of our solar system, and
about the nature and history of Earth itself. Time and again,
scientists who defend prevailing theories on the big bang, solar
system, and comets have failed to predict new discoveries. Time and
again their views have been falsified by new facts and findings.

Electric
Universe/Plasma Cosmology has long since developed to the point where it
has been acknowledged as a legitimate field of study by the American
Physical Society and the Institute of Electrical & Electronic
Engineers (IEEE) Plasma Science Division. And yet this new and
important branch of astronomy receives little attention in the
mainstream press.

There is now
substantial evidence that a fundamental shift in thinking will be of
immense importance to the future of science and our planet, touching
on global warming and natural disasters. However, when there is a
crucial change in cosmology it may be difficult to take the new view
seriously. Doing so may even jeopardize academic careers.
Journalists seeking the facts about a new theory of the cosmos may
be assured by "experts" that the new paradigm is erroneous or
worse.

In a time of
scientific controversy, science editors have an even more vital role
to play than usual. Investigative reporting by objective
journalists not only presents both sides of the issue, it also helps
concerned parties sort out the truth. The emergence of Electric
Universe/Plasma Cosmology as a new paradigm in 21st
century cosmology presents science editors with an unprecedented
opportunity to investigate the role that the electric force plays in
the workings of our universe.

For example,
the whole paradigm of solar energy being generated by internal
nuclear fusion needs to be replaced with an externally powered
electrical model where diffuse galactic Birkeland currents neck down
on the sun and other stars to power them and generate their
prominent electrical properties.

NASA's recently completed "Deep Impact" mission was spectacularly
successful in its engineering achievements and the dramatic
information gathered about comets. However, because NASA scientists
have little or no understanding of the electrical properties of
comets, the mission’s findings and those of the Stardust Mission
left cometologists unable to adequately explain their findings.
They failed to achieve their primary goal of measuring the impact
crater. See:

And lately, thanks
to high resolution space-exploration photography, the evidence for
electric discharge machining (EDM) scarring on Mars has become
nothing short of overwhelming. Dust storms, valleys, craters,
rilles. fulgamites, surface patterns called “spiders” and dendritic
ridges, and concretions called “blueberries” have now been
photographed in high resolution, and show unequivocal signs of past
and current electrical activity. All of these
features have been duplicated in electrical discharge laboratories.
Meanwhile planetologists are using erosional processes experienced on
earth but impossible on Mars to explain these patterns.

This is all much
more than an academic concern. Billions of dollars are
being poured into projects such as the space tether, the "space
elevator", and other futile projects such as the search for "gravity
waves". Of course, swinging a long wire through an
electric field will generate voltage and current in the wire, and the
"space tether" violently “shorted out” when this was done with a
satellite.
NASA didn't expect this and still probably doesn’t get the big
picture. If the new science is correct, such projects
that ignore the electrical nature of astrophysical reality are
doomed from the outset.

Cosmology has been
called "the Queen of the sciences" because it underpins scientific
thinking in many fields. If it is seriously mistaken, the
consequence of a correction will be a seismic shift in the sciences
and our culture. Always before, such paradigm shifts have
opened up improved understandings and new technologies. An
investigation into the depths of the growing conflict between
electrical and gravitational visions of space could uncover the
science news of the future.