Towards Critical Solidarity

We must provide the basis for a progressive alternative to the interpretation of race relations, moving the political culture of black America from a racialized discourse and analysis to a critique of inequality which has the capacity and potential to speak to the majority of American people. This leap in theory and social analysis must be made, if black America has any hope of transcending its current impasse of powerlessness and systemic inequality. As C.L.R. James astutely observed: ‘The race question is subsidiary to the class question in politics, and to think of imperialism in terms of race is disastrous. But to neglect the racial factor as merely incidental is an error only less grave than to make it fundamental.’

Manning Marable, Beyond Boundaries

In this third monthly column by the South Asia Solidarity Initiative (SASI) we begin with these profound words of Manning Marable who passed away in April 2011, in part because of the wonderful coincidence of naming this column, ‘Beyond Boundaries,’ which is also the title of his selected writings published in 2011. In the introduction to his writings, Marable acknowledges his intellectual debt to C.L.R. James, and borrows the title from the classic on cricket and colonialism, Beyond a Boundary. As South Asians politically engaged in the U.S. we have much to learn from and be inspired by intellectuals like James and Marable. Our solidarity should not be bereft of such political insights, and our politics must confront the blindness of a South Asian authenticity and the racism of a South Asian supremacy that does not engage the politics of black America while living in this country.

For us, the concept solidarity is antithetical to any politics of authenticity and complicates identity politics. Indeed, if we are to think of South Asia, as a space or region beyond nation-state boundaries, but one that connects people through shared histories and common struggles, then South Asia solidarity must question reductive notions of authenticity and identity, and address problems of inequality and power. This idea of South Asia would be all the more important for solidarity from the distance of the West and the diaspora. And we must go further – and draw from James and Marable, and their commitment and courage to address the difficult tension between race and class – and open critical questions about our solidarity.

By reflecting on two recent instances of solidarity campaigns, we wish to suggest that notions of critical solidarity have to be addressed in an even more complex manner in an era of global communication. The Free Binayak Sen campaign that had a very strong international component complementing the Indian campaign is an excellent example of the rich potential for global solidarity. Binayak Sen, a physician-for-the-poor, public health professional, civil liberties and development activist based in Chhattisgarh, India was arrested in 2007 under the Unlawful Prevention Activities Act, 1967 (UAPA) and the Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act, 2005 (CSPSA) on charges of abetting the Maoists. He is currently out on bail after being unjustly convicted of sedition under the Indian Penal Code.

Since Sen believed that health rights had to be situated within a holistic conception of human rights including political and socio-economic rights, it was not surprising that he also became a part of the civil liberties movement. As the national Vice President of People’s Union for Civil Liberties, one of the oldest civil liberties organizations in India, Sen was not only a critic of the state’s development policies that favored corporate interests over those of indigenous people of Chhattisgarh but was also a critic of the Salwa Judum, state-sponsored militia set up in 2005. Such activism led him to face the wrath of the state.

The response against the unjust arrest of Sen was unprecedented among wide sections in many parts of the world. Just to give a few examples, there were not only simultaneous protests outside of consulates and embassies in many U.S. cities as well as in U.K. and Canada, there was also mobilization by some of these groups to get 22 Nobel Laureates to sign a letter protesting his arrest. Protest statements by groups such as Amnesty International and one by the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders was also ensured in the case.

This is a significant example of the potential of international solidarity, where groups are able to point to the draconian nature of extraordinary laws introduced by the Indian state against those who dare to dissent and create visibility for activists such as Binayak Sen portraying them as global symbols for all those fighting for equality and justice. However, even the advances of this campaign raise several questions: Is one able to successfully link individual instances of detention to the extraordinary laws such as CSPSA and UAPA? Can the link between militias such as Salwa Judum and the neoliberal politics of mining rich areas be exposed through this campaign? Can one sustain the international support for all the other such dissenting activists who have been jailed in recent times? How does one connect civil liberties to economic and democratic rights in a way that extends the wider appeal created by the Binayak Sen campaign?

Free Binayak Sen action outside the Indian consulate in March 2009

While progressive groups based in the U.S. feel most comfortable promoting particular issues among the diasporic communities, there is often reluctance about intervening in the internal debates raised by these campaigns themselves. One such example is the hesitation to discuss the troubled history of the Maoists during the campaign against Operation Greenhunt. While there was consensus that this operation – an attempt by the state to use unprecedented military force against the Maoists in the central part of India – had to be condemned and opposed in no uncertain terms, there was also the silencing of ongoing critiques of some long term strategies adopted by the Maoists.

Once again, the politics of location was brought in to remind the constructive critics that this was not the place or time to raise such questions. The moment had to be one of full unconditional support. There appeared to be little space for a position that was critical of the state while asking certain questions of the Maoists themselves. Particularly, questions about the Andhra experience, including their relationship to mass mobilization, to practices of democratization, to the limits of militarization, to unprovoked killings of state officials as well as NGO and other political activists were avoided. While all these are complex questions with no easy answers, the debate on Operation Greenhunt went ahead alongside new narratives as if the Maoists had not in some form or the other existed since the 1960s. And that traditions of feminist, dalit, human rights critiques from within had not equally been a part of their history.

For activists outside South Asia, if they are to mobilize in solidarity, one wonders whether it is possible to have a more critical stance, which is cognizant of these complex histories? While there is no substitute to being on the ground, however, when that alone is seen as the basis of authentic intervention, one wonders whether this emphasis on authenticity forecloses the possibilities of rich debates and informed engagements. In effect, there appears to be a reluctance to deal with the messiness on the ground. Solidarity then takes the form of a default pursuit of the most popular “radical” campaign, not realizing that sometimes these are opportunities lost for strengthening our solidarity. At such moments, is it not our responsibility to question as much as to support, for only that would mean solidarity in struggle, rather than existing completely outside of it.

Critical solidarity then should be willing to engage both the substance and strategies of the relationship of defending one courageous activist to the larger question of neoliberalism, and the challenges of questioning the radical Left even when it is under severe attack by the state. James and Marable further remind us that in our solidarity with struggles in South Asia and our opposition to imperialism, we have to engage class and race, both there and here. Thus going beyond the boundaries of nation-states, and informing our politics by struggles for justice in South Asia as much as by struggles around class and race here in the U.S., would be important for our constructive turn towards critical solidarity.

This post has helped me for an article which I am writing. Thank you for giving me another point of view on this topic. Now I can easily complete my article. Cheers and thanks for posting something worth reading.papersconsulting.com

Also, I made sure to bookmark your website so I can come back later. I enjoyed every moment of reading it. it was very informative. I look forward in reading more of your work. http://www.templatesspot.com/

Thanks for the marvelous posting ! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you might be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and will often come back later in life. I want to encourage you to definitely continue your great job.
cell spyware

This post has helped me for an article which I am writing. Thank you for giving me another point of view on this topic. Now I can easily complete my article. Cheers and thanks for posting something worth reading. Allahabad Bank in Yamunanagar

I absolutely agree with you and thank you for pointing out several relevant and important examples. Several blog contributors have written extensively on this topic.Fiber Optic Patch Panel Thanks for these sharing.Fiber Optic Terminal Box

This is one of the best blogs I’ve ever read. I m absolutely excited to get to read such a well blog. The amount of data that I get is truly great. This is an good masterpiece. I am truly impressed. I would love to read more of your blogs. online shoes

That is really good post its quite interesting and very much credible. This post has shared great information, Background problem is also mentioned in it and discussed it in quite well manner, keep sharing more and more good posts. Nokia Pakistan

Ahilan Kadirgamar and Jinee Lokaneeta are members of South Asia Solidarity Initiative (SASI).

SOUTH ASIA SOLIDARITY INITIATIVE (SASI) is an organization based the United States that is in solidarity with progressive social movements and democratic politics in South Asia. http://www.southasiainitiative.org.

Recent Articles

How can an event be at once ordinary and extraordinary, simultaneously decisive and indecisive? The victory of Narendra Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the Indian parliamentary elections of 2014 is indeed a watershed moment; for the first time in the history of independent India, it will be ruled exclusively by a Hindu supremacist party. And yet, a careful look at the way the Modi/BJP campaign produced this victory yields a picture that can only be characterized as simultaneously ordinary and extraordinary, decisive and indecisive.

In 2006 and 2007, I spent several months in Ahmedabad while on a fellowship from my university in the US. During my time in Ahmedabad, I interacted with the mostly-Hindu NGO staff where I was based, residents of the largely Hindu shantytown where the NGO was working, and professors at Gujarat University. Less than five years had passed since the city had gone through its nightmare: vicious riots involving saffron-clad men entering urban neighborhoods and brutalizing, gang-raping, and burning other human beings. Some 1,500 Muslims were killed.

Sabelo Narasimhan reflects on this year's Gay Pride parade in Bombay, India. In the wake of the recent judgement criminalizing homosexuality, the images in this photoessay reveal the unbounded spirit of rebellion and resistance of the community.