After taking in critiques on the initial draft of my first SCP. I hope that this version is more up to par with what makes a good SCP, but as before I am always up for quality criticism on the quality of the writing and the overall idea for this SCP. I greatly appreciate the reviews, and i cannot wait to contribute to this excellent collection of fascinating creatures and objects.

" SCP-2668 is stored within an isolated single-SCP area, designated area-█." I'm not entirely certain what is being conveyed here; it sounds like this is kept in a facility that houses no other SCPs, but the phrasing on this could be improved to more clearly convey that information. I feel like Site would be a better designation than Area. Additionally if we're talking about buildings the Foundation has built, it's always capitalized: Area-█, not area-█.

"one class C personnel member" I'm not sure what that is. This sounds like it would be low-rank researcher duty.

" interact with SCP-2668 in a manner similar to that of interacting with a human infant. " I feel would work better as "interact with SCP-XXXX as though it were a human infant."

"by SCP-2886 if it enters into a latter level of development." doesn't sound very clinical, at least to me. "…should SCP-XXXX develop beyond its current state" or something similar I feel would work better.

"for a period between 3-15 weeks are permitted to enter a range less than 10 meters away from SCP-2668." Would make more sense just to not let them enter the hallway/area leading to its containment cell to me.

" If SCP-2668 reaches level 2 development, SCP-2668 is to be left in containment chamber for 24 hours without contact with any personnel. If SCP-2668 reaches level 3, SCP-2668 must be reduced back to level 1 before SCP-2668 reaches Level 4 development via any available means.

If SCP-2668 reaches its 4th stage of development, nearest class 5 personnel members are to be alerted, and the facility is to be evacuated as quickly as possible. Onsite explosives, implemented on area-█ post incident 2668-3, are to be remotely detonated before the subject escapes. If SCP-2668 escapes, nearest members of the ██████ family are to be evacuated to facility ███, located in ████, ██████."

A lot of this seems very out of place here. Protocols for Reaching level 2/3/etc development seems like it would be more at home in the table below, since it seems like as long as we don't let pregnant women get near it, it won't grow.

Additionally, alerting x nearby people is a step i'd axe, going directly to site evacuation and detonation of onsite warhead. Also a lot of blackboxing on things that someone who needs to do these things seems like they really might need to know who and where to take them.

I rather like the following bits, about what it is and what it does. These are pretty interesting, and some test logs of some of these things would be pretty cool to see.

Regarding the chart and following areas, the main line that kind of sticks out is "It is unknown what SCP-2668 will do upon reaching any individual member of the family," I feel like this could be implied rather than said outright, in that we simply haven't allowed it to happen yet. I still don't think that blackboxing the family name adds anything to the article, and it doesn't seem like knowledge of the family being in this document will cause a containment breach.

Nothing strikes me as out of place in the following addenda or incident logs other than the formatting, ". 10", ". Throughout the duration" seems like these were meant to be bullet points.

Conceptually, i'm on the fence. I'm more interested in the neat things it can do when given instructions than what happens when some crazies burst in and start throwing pregnant women at it; as the former grips me far more than the latter. Personally, I want to see more about it when things are going right than when things are going wrong. This is an interesting anomaly and while the 'negative' sections don't really detract in any way, I think a some of the descriptions of the level 4 form could be pared back to present a more concise and chilling view of the terror.

I very much appreciate the critique. I wanted to ask if I were to do test longs for the normal state of this entity, should these be a separate linked document, or collapsibles on the article it's self? Also if I were to trim back the description of the 4th form, what aspects would you suggest I trim back? Once again thank you.