Tammy Cochran v. Northeast Kingdom Human Services (November 4, 2009)
STATE OF VERMONT
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Tammy Cochran Opinion No. 31A-09WC
v. By: Jane Gomez-Dimotsis
Hearing Officer
Northeast Kingdom Human Services For: Patricia Moulton Powden
Commissioner
State File No. X-00726
RULING ON CLAIMANT’S REQUEST FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES
After a formal hearing in the above matter, the Commissioner issued its Opinion and Order on August 12, 2009. In it, the Commissioner determined that Claimant successfully had established her right to temporary total disability benefits for a disputed period after Defendant claimed she had reached end medical result, but denied her claims for permanent partial disability benefits, vocational rehabilitation and ongoing medical coverage for narcotic pain medications and anti-depressants.
Claimant has now submitted her request for an award of costs and attorney fees pursuant to 21 V.S.A. §678. Claimant has submitted evidence of costs totaling $766.80. These costs all appear to be related to pursuit of the claim as a whole, and none can be attributed solely to one disputed issue or another. It is appropriate, therefore, to award all of the requested costs.
As for attorney fees, Claimant has submitted evidence of fees totaling $13,432.50. In cases where a claimant has only partially prevailed, the Commissioner typically exercises her discretion to award fees commensurate with the extent of the claimant’s success. Hill v. CV Oil Co., Opinion No. 15-09WC (May 26, 2009). Here, I find it appropriate to award Claimant seventy-five percent of her fees, or $10,074.38.
2
ORDER:
Defendant is hereby ORDERED to pay:
1. Costs totaling $766.80; and
2. Attorney fees totaling $10,074.38.
DATED at Montpelier, Vermont this 4th day of November 2009.
___________________________
Patricia Moulton Powden
Commissioner
Appeal:
Within 30 days after copies of this opinion have been mailed, either party may appeal questions of fact or mixed questions of law and fact to a superior court or questions of law to the Vermont Supreme Court. 21 V.S.A. §§670, 672.

Related Posts

Did you like this entry? Here are a few more posts that might be interesting for you.