your functional descriptions are insufficient as always. i don't know that functional descriptions in this format would ever be sufficient.

replacing all of your functional descriptions with the appropriate function and answering in terms of my perceived relation with that function, your algorithm gave me LIE over ILI. your last one was better.

I know. It's like, "Do you think of yourself in general as a happy person?" Ok quiz. Ummm well I was happy Saturday, but then Larry stole my Cheetos and called me a loser in front of everyone, so I had a day of total emotional angst. Plus I think I've been suffering depression......but this morning I was so giddy I gave my driving test instructor a bad name by practically perpendicular parking. Ok so I'll put "mostly not true"....but wait, someone told me today that they were glad I was always such a cheerful person.....so should I put "mostly true".......Ahh well it turns out I either can't be honest with myself, or I truly have no idea what kind of person I am, what I act like, or what I stand for. I'll just put "nuetral" in there to satisfy everybody."

A trip through the mind of dolphin. What a trip indeed!

Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend

Interesting test, but a lot of the questions were kind of vague, and "dislike" is not the same as "don't see the point in." I got a first place tie between ESFj, ISFp, INFp, and ENFj. Your previous tests gave me ENTp/INTj.

And if the point is to give this test to people with no knowledge of socionics, then maybe you should have multiple (but simpler) questions assessing each cell, so there is some inherent averaging in the results

This test has some potentially good ideas, although, as niffweed says, your descriptions need to be improved upon. Also, why were some of the questions disabled? (I could still answer them by putting a number in the box, but didn't, in case it affected my results aversely.)

Apparently I am equally static and dynamic, and am equally a member of Gamma and Delta, although because my results dictate Gamma NT is most likely, I assume that Gamma is my quadra. I am also equally as likely to be an Alpha NT as I am a Delta ST.

I know. It's like, "Do you think of yourself in general as a happy person?" Ok quiz. Ummm well I was happy Saturday, but then Larry stole my Cheetos and called me a loser in front of everyone, so I had a day of total emotional angst. Plus I think I've been suffering depression......but this morning I was so giddy I gave my driving test instructor a bad name by practically perpendicular parking. Ok so I'll put "mostly not true"....but wait, someone told me today that they were glad I was always such a cheerful person.....so should I put "mostly true".......Ahh well it turns out I either can't be honest with myself, or I truly have no idea what kind of person I am, what I act like, or what I stand for. I'll just put "nuetral" in there to satisfy everybody."

Exactly! I try to think of different incidents ... but then they all seem to contradict each other ... and I think "well ok - i said this or I did this", and then I think "but actually I was thinking this ... so should that count as this or that?? Oh forget it - I'll just put down not sure" And then I realise I'm putting down too many not sures, so I convince myself that I have strong opinions on things that I probably don't and start going with the extremely sures and not in a million years answers and then .... yeah - I'll shut up now

Dee can you submit the algorithms for this test. Dee this test rubbish. Dee you should be more responsible. Dee your guestions are all wrong. Dee why haven't you fixed it yet. Dee why are you using questions that don't make sense. Dee is it fixed yet?

Dee can you submit the algorithms for this test. Dee this test rubbish. Dee you should be more responsible. Dee your guestions are all wrong. Dee why haven't you fixed it yet. Dee why are you using questions that don't make sense. Dee is it fixed yet?

Originally Posted by Cyclops

I mean DEE COME THE FUCK ON!!! Whats the point in having a firkin test if people can't believe in the results!!!

Originally Posted by Cyclops

.. I mean anyone can play with the buttons

Originally Posted by Cyclops

Your tests were wrong

Originally Posted by Cyclops

I mean.. HOW THE HELL CAN I BE CONFIDENT IN THIS RESULT LOL? THIS TEST DOES NOT PROVIDE AMY MEANS OF CONFIDENCE PEOPLE CAN HAVE IN THESE RESULTS AND THIS F* SUCKS!

Originally Posted by Cyclops

Dee: Cyclops you are the only person interested in the algorithms

Cyclops: I think you should submit them. It's the stuff of dreams lol!! But seriously they're all wrong

I'm going to make my own.

*eats sandwich*

Originally Posted by Cyclops

I just ate a sandwich

^^ This is golden. GOLDEN I TELL YOU.

Originally Posted by Cyclops

Dee is it done yet. Why can't you get it right first time. You know there is a lot to be said for questions being honest *lol*

Originally Posted by Cyclops

Oh YEAH I TOTALLY AGREE!!! lol

Originally Posted by Cyclops

Haha u haven't sat my test yet!

Originally Posted by Cyclops

Well.. ACTUALLY IF TO CONSIDER the dynamics of THE BRAIN ON THE WHOLE OF A SYSTEM, hypothesized and clarification of THE OTHER +1 TO IxE !! lol