CNN retracts story that giant asteroid will destroy Earth on March 35, 2041

This is CNN… issuing a correction over a viral, user-posted report that a giant asteroid is on a collision course with Earth, and would wipe out life on the planet on March 35, 2041. Now “the most trusted name in news” has space egg on its face.

The report, called “Giant asteroid possibly on collision
course with Earth,” was posted over the weekend by iReport
user Marcus575. It quoted NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory as
saying a 10-mile wide object is on a trajectory that could bring
a “high speed collision course with our fragile planet”
from 51 million miles away or so. The date of the
“potentially lethal encounter” was listed as “March
35, 2041.”

The post notes in multiple places it is not vetted for or by CNN.

See a screenshot of the iReport below, captured by NASA Watch’s
Cowing.

The iReport was pulled down on Monday, but not before it received
over 250,000 views and was shared over 24,000 times on Facebook,
Salon reported. Not to mention, several major publications linked
to it, according to CNET.

CNN replaced
the post with a statement: “NASA has confirmed via email
that this story is false. A spokeswoman for the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory says that the largest object detected by NEOWISE
measures 3 km in diameter and poses no risk to Earth. The iReport
has been removed,” a CNN iReport producer wrote.

Now that we know we’re not all going to die, nor do we need to
send Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck into space with a nuclear bomb
(and Steven Tyler wailing in the background), the media is
focusing on how the hoax will affect the reputation of the first
24-hour cable news network.

“CNN destroyed by huge asteroid: What happens when a news
[organization] fails to fact-check or monitor user-generated
content? Your brand goes boom,” the
Salon headline about the fake post read.

CNN describes iReport - its user-generated social media platform
- as “an invitation for you to be a part of CNN's coverage of
the stories you care about and an opportunity to be a part of a
global community of men and women who are as passionate about the
news as you are.”

The website notes that the content is not moderated.
“Everything you see on iReport starts with someone in the CNN
audience. The stories here are not edited fact-checked or
screened before they post. CNN's producers will check out some of
the most compelling, important and urgent iReports and, once
they're cleared for CNN, make them a part of CNN's news
coverage.”

Comedian Stephen Colbert
warned of just such problems on “The Colbert Report” in
November 2011, when CNN laid off 50 staff members, mostly editors
and photojournalists, calling them “redundant” due to
user-generated content and social media on the network’s iReport
site. “Why buy the cow when you can have it shakily video
tape its own milk for free?” Colbert asked, introducing a
satirical sketch pointing out a multitude of issues with the
iReport model.

Keith Cowing, a former NASA employee who runs the popular
Nasa Watch blog, pointed out some of the clues the post was a
hoax. “March 35? No comment from NASA. Love the tags:
‘beiber, war, gaming, stocks, science, cyrus, space, obama,
earth, states’,” he wrote.

MIT’s
Knight Science Journalism blog delved deeper into the
iReport’s issues. “The grammar is wonky. The style suggests
the writer might be lampooning overblown science writing,”
Faye Flam wrote. “The message is clear enough. It’s not a
nice thing to contemplate the first day back at work after a
three-day holiday weekend, but the good news is that it looks
like the only impact story here is the fact that the cable news
network has slammed the Earth with an enormous bolide of
B.S.”

Flam also originally mused, “One can only hope that with a
proclamation of the end of the world, CNN wouldn’t wait for NASA
to 'confirm' that it’s wrong.” (That sentence has since been
struck out.)

Salon’s biting commentary of the incident ends with, “The
only silver lining here: CNN’s next bogus tale of annihilation
probably won’t get the same traction. It takes a lot of work to
build a trusted brand. But ruining your reputation is easy.”