Maritime Link's ratepayer impact worries energy minister

Andrew Younger says he shares misgivings held by critics

In July, the UARB gave the $1.5 billion project approval on the condition that Emera provide a written guarantee to provide a larger supply of electricity at market price — in order to make it the lowest cost alternative. (Government of Nova Scotia)

Related Stories

Nova Scotia's Emergy Minister is expressing fresh reservations about the $1.52-billion Maritime Link project ahead of a crucial round of public hearings.

Andrew Younger said he shares some of the misgivings held by advocates who speak for the province's consumers and small businesses.

"We're no different than some of the other interveners," he said in an interview. "I recognize that … some of the other interveners have concerns about ratepayers, and that's my primary concern as well."

Halifax-based energy company Emera Inc. wants to build a subsea cable to Labrador, which would allow Emera subsidiary Nova Scotia Power to buy energy from the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric plant, under construction in Labrador.

If the project is approved, Nova Scotia ratepayers would foot the bill for the $1.52-billion Maritime Link.

Energy Minister Andrew Younger said he was reluctant to reveal what worries him about the latest proposal from Emera. (CBC)

The minister, a vocal critic of the project when he was on the Opposition benches, said government lawyers will have plenty of questions for Emera when the hearings start Thursday.

He said the province's new Liberal government will take a position based on what it hears, then deliver its assessment during closing statements on Friday or Monday. Then it will be up to the independent Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board to decide if the project is in the best interest of ratepayers.

When he was an Opposition critic, Younger described the original agreement — signed by Emera and Nalcor, Newfoundland and Labrador's Crown-owned energy company — as "misguided and expensive."

Previous government criticized

He criticized the former New Democratic government's support for the project, saying the New Democrats were ignoring rising costs, allowing a lack of transparency and accepting that Nova Scotians wouldn't own the link when the agreement expired.

When asked if he shared those concerns, Younger deferred to the board.

"It comes down to a question of how you interpret the board's [July] decision," he said.

The board's own consultants have endorsed the agreement, having concluded that enough market-priced energy will be available because both Nalcor and Emera have committed to building more generating capacity if there are shortfalls.

However, critics have also suggested there are added costs for ratepayers in the new agreement — a concern dismissed by the board's consultants.

'Creates risk for Nova Scotia ratepayers'

Bill Black, an outspoken business leader and former leadership candidate for Nova Scotia's Progressive Conservatives, has said the latest agreement "creates risk for Nova Scotian ratepayers, increases the potential cost and fails to provide the commitment required by the board."

Black said in a submission to the board that Nova Scotia's ability to buy electricity from Muskrat Falls could be short-circuited if the demand for power from either province grows faster than expected.

Todd McDonald, a commodities trader who speaks for the Nova Scotia Lower Power Rates Alliance, said he is particularly concerned by a clause that he believes could leave Nova Scotia competing with other provinces to buy increasingly expensive power from Muskrat Falls.

"I can't possibly understand how this could get passed," he said in an interview.

The board's consultants concluded otherwise, saying Emera has secured the right to buy electricity ahead of anyone else.

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are moderated and published according to our submission guidelines.