A Texas law firm representing the State Department whistleblower behind recent federal complaints fell victim to a daring break-in last week, in which
the suspects reportedly made off with computers but left behind other valuables.

Interesting to say the least. See more about the whistleblower, as shared-below the video-. It's being compared to a Watergate-style break in a
source(#1 Additional Links), and well for obvious reasons is controversial, as to if they were just stealing for profit, why did they only take what
they did? Whistleblower has stated that they are being intimidated-see below. It's shared in a few sources so far-original source requires membership
to view but is linked(#2 Additional Links).

There's a few video sources, such as below, that were shared days prior but the explained news of the story is more recent.

Security Cameras Catch Mystery Break In At Whistleblower's Law Firm

The State Department investigator who accused colleagues last week of using drugs, soliciting prostitutes, and having sex with minors says that
Foggy Bottom is now engaged in an “intimidation” campaign to stop her. Source

I guess the traitors in our government private contracting business spying capabilities could not get the information they wanted and they needed
physical information, what a whole bunch of dirt, they have to act like thieves in order to get away with what they want.

learn people this is the corrupted trash that is protecting our freedoms and liberties, while keeping America save and spying on us at the same
time.

Well, you know, I'd love to believe the Department of Justice had nothing to do with this ....except they outright lie to our faces and under Oath
then treat the conduct so casually, I'm afraid I can't believe anything that comes from the mouths of anyone in this administration without
corroboration at this point.

This is what happens when scumbags get power and lie as a way of life. Nothing, anywhere on ANY topic is believed at face value anymore.

Among the odd details about the robbery is that only one credit card was stolen from a drawer that contained four cards. It's unclear to the
attorneys why the crooks took one card from the drawer, but left behind three others and unsecured silver valued around $125.

The missing credit card was used for several retail purchases at Dallas' Valley View Center mall around 4:45 p.m. on June 29, Mathias said.

Eerily, the shopping spree happened four hours before security cameras in the firm's office building recorded two suspects first entering the building
and then leaving with computers.

So the tape on the security camera was tampered with to show a later time of the robbery, since the bank statements show the card was used earlier?
That sounds like top level intimidation: "See, we can mess with your whole world", type behavior.

On the flip side, maybe the attorney's robbed themselves to bring this case into the spotlight and forget that an alleged stolen card was used
earlier.

Or - they were robbed twice. Once by the professionals, then the amateurs showed up later to get caught on tape and to throw the investigative trail
off -- though using the stolen card would not be a smart move done by professionals.

Villegas introduced Torres to the man on the phone, Theo. He didn’t offer a last name. Theo said he worked for the government and was recruiting
Torres to test the defenses of Washington-area banks. The plan was simple: Theo would tell him which bank to target, and Torres would give a manager a
note demanding money. Armed security officers, threats to call the police, or a wait that exceeded five minutes would be cause to flee. If he left
with money, he’d be paid $25,000. Successful or not, he was guaranteed $2,500 for taking part. Torres would deliver any money recovered to a
location near Richmond. If arrested, Torres should stay silent. Federal authorities would get him out in 24 hours.

Originally posted by marg6043
I guess the traitors in our government private contracting business spying capabilities could not get the information they wanted and they needed
physical information, what a whole bunch of dirt, they have to act like thieves in order to get away with what they want.

learn people this is the corrupted trash that is protecting our freedoms and liberties, while keeping America save and spying on us at the same
time.

Are we feeling safeeeer now.

Thanks, Marg.. I couldn't feel safer if zombie Stalin was back from the dead and
owned 51% of the stock in ALL the electronic voting machine companies.

I keep trying that bait too--but I never get a bite. It irks the hell out of me, though--because it's the same as saying, "Why do I need my
Constitutional rights if I'm not doing anything wrong?" Which, by implication, is the same as saying to me: "You must be some kind of criminal if
you're so worried about privacy and illegal search and seizure."

But I agree: This is a perfect illustration of why you need those rights especially when you're not doing anything wrong....

Originally posted by butcherguy
We need another 'Deep Throat' to drop the dime on the State Department.
That would make it a better story.

With allegations of drug trafficking, soliciting prostitutes, and minors
involved besides, the story is already loaded with potential informants
satisfying the designation reprised from decades ago.

I guess you are what you do......especially if you're doing what they say.
That didn't quite look in 'print' as I had intended; except for the dangerous
connotation (getting a little too close for discomfort?) of a defined informant.

And the story couldn't be any better, it's over the top.
I threw my TV out over two years ago-- and the only thing that's beginning
to scare me about this country at all is the reality show scripts are beginning
to show up on the MSM. And this is real? Did Archie Bunker die, or Norman
Lear Holdings just lose some syndication? I wanna move to Rollerball and be
John Beck... don't ask if before or after the rabbit punch, I'm flippin' a coin now.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.