Menu

14a – Affidavit / Affirmation of Truth

Affirmation of Truth
Let it be known that ____________, a man, a living soul, of sound mind and majority in age,
herein known as “One”, that is not an Australian Citizen, with a natural born and promised
allegiance to concept of The Commonwealth of Australia and loyal supporter of The Queen’s
Most Excellent Majesty sworn duty; hereby states under unlimited liability that all the truths and
all the facts shown in this asseveration are the true, correct, complete, certain and not misleading
in any manner I am aware of; let One’s yes be yes and One’s no be no, so help One YHWH
(God).
a) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that “The
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act as Proclaimed and Gazetted on the first day of
January 1901 did not form a valid “constitutional monarchy” known as “The Commonwealth of
Australia” also known as “The Commonwealth”; and,
b) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that “The
Supreme Authority” is not vested in “the people” of the “Original States” and The Commonwealth;
and,
c) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that One’s
natural born and promised allegiance is not to The Commonwealth of Australia as established
UNDER the Founding and Primary Law, Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as
Proclaimed and Gazetted.; and,
d) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that One is not
a British Subject and an Australian Citizen of The Commonwealth of Australia; and,
e) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that The
Commonwealth is not a Constitutional Monarchy; and,
f) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that Her Most
Excellent Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second is not the Defender of the faith and upholder of
God’s laws; and,
g) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that Her Most
Excellent Majesty The Queen is not the defender of the “Royal Law” as written in the “King James
Version Bible 1611”; and,
h) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that Her Most
Excellent Majesty The Queen is not the Sovereign of The Commonwealth of Australia; and,
i) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that Her Most
Excellent Majesty The Queen did not make a promise at Her Coronation to uphold the laws of
God and Australia; and,
j) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that Her Most
Excellent Majesty The Queen’s Jurisdiction is not the Royal Law of the King James Bible; and,
k) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that The Law
of the King James Bible is not the Supreme and Royally defended Law of The Commonwealth of
Australia; and,
l) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that The
Commonwealth is not a Christian Monarchy and a God’s Law nation/country; and,
m) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that ‘the
people’ of The Commonwealth under God can-not be quasi autonomous and quasi selfgoverning;
and,
n) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that One has
ever consented to be governed by a foreign belligerent Political Party Sovereign State/Nation and
not to be quasi autonomous and quasi self-governing; and,
o) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that any “de
facto office” within The Commonwealth is not bound by the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act 1901 and Common Law of England and duty to accommodate; and,
p) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that
Queensland law enforcement officers (sheriffs, police etc.) do not swear an oath or affirmation to
serve The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty and to uphold and discharge all duties faithfully to the
law; and,
q) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that
Queensland law enforcement officers must not keep and preserve Her Most Excellent Majesty
The Queen’s Royal Style as “Defender of the Faith” peace without malice or ill-will; and,
r) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that
Queensland law enforcement officers can-not be held accountable for breaking Common Law of
England and or the laws of God Our Monarch has sworn herself to defend,
s) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that the Crown
in Right of Queensland is not a quasi-belligerent, quasi Sovereign State and foreign to The
Commonwealth of Australia as established UNDER the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted ; and,
t) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that a
man/woman if forced to obey the laws of a Political Party belligerent foreign State/Nation against
their will is not involuntary servitude (slavery); and,
u) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that de facto
Statutes/Legislation of a belligerent Sovereign State apply to those who do not consent to be
governed,
v) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that
Statutes/Legislation of a belligerent de facto Sovereign State are not merely pretend laws ((High
Court of Australia; South Australia v Commonwealth (“First Uniform Tax case”) (1942) 65 CLR
373 at 408, Latham Chief Justice)) to be obeyed only by those who consent; and,
w) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that ignorance
of the Law can be used as an excuse and that those in defiance of such Political Party law cannot
be held liable privately, jointly and severally; and,
x) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that anyone
forcing a man/woman to obey a pretend law is not forcing the man/woman into involuntary
servitude by threats and intimidation; and,
y) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that any
Statute/Legislation is not subordinate to The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901
and Common Law of England unless by consent of man/woman to whom they apply; and,
z) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that any office
has authority to break any Common Law of England or Law made by the Parliament of the
Commonwealth forcing any man/woman to obey Statute/Legislation against their will violating
God’s law and not be acting in a private capacity; and,
aa) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that anyone
who exceeds the authority of their office is not privately liable; and,
bb) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that anyone
who takes an oath or affirmation to Her Most Excellent Majesty The Queen is not bound to the
Laws of The Queen the current holder of the Crown whom they did promise to serve and uphold
Her law; and,
cc) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that anyone
who takes an oath or affirmation to Her Most Excellent Majesty The Queen and goes beyond the
authority of their office is not bringing the name of The Queen into disrepute; and,
dd) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that anyone
who brings the name of Her Most Excellent Majesty The Queen ability to defend the laws of God
into disrepute is not committing treason against The Queen; and,
ee) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that anyone
has any authority to take away or outlaw any gifts mentioned in Genesis 1:29 of the King James
Version Bible 1611 where it does most assuredly state: “And God said, Behold, I have given you
every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is
the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be your meat for meat.”; and,
ff) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that these gifts
were given to “THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA” a corporation a legal fiction, or that
a corporate legal fiction has any authority to take away from or obstruct the people’s access to
and from for beneficial use of such gifts.
gg) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that any
man/woman that takes a gift of God from another man/woman without consent is not committing
larceny under God’s Law; and,
hh) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that indicates
that if anyone man or woman stops or obstructs the official function of one’s lawful ministry upon
the pretence of enforcing civil law is not committing a false arrest upon an assumption of
jurisdiction or authority,
ii) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that any de
facto officer by approaching a man/woman, whom has done no wrong, while armed is not
intimidating or a menace.; and,
jj) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidencing that
menacing, intimidating and threatening by a lawful officer of Her Most Excellent Majesty is
carrying out their oath bound duties,
kk) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that anyone
who searches ones’ property while One is being deprived of ones’ liberty upon a false pretense or
warrantless assumption is conducting a lawful search
ll) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that if a
man/woman is taken from where they wish to be by force is not abduction and kidnap; and,
mm) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that any
officer who goes beyond the authority of their office is not committing misfeasance and/or
malfeasance under Tort law; and,
nn) One has not seen or presented with facts of evidence that senior oath sworn officers
are not responsible for insuring that Law is upheld; and,
oo) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that any oath
sworn senior officers knowing that a wrong has been committed and not investigating in pursuit of
rectifying it is aiding and abetting under criminal Law; and,
pp) One has not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that one is a
person that God has no respect for as mentioned in the King James Bible Deuteronomy
1:17,10:17 James 2:9
One sincerely believes no evidence to the contrary exists.
This affirmation is autographed and sealed by The Ex officio Occupant of the Office of
Executor/Steward for the _____________________, Estate as One’s solemn act and deed on
this day: one-six-three-four-three (Julian Date) _____________________on the original State
known as New South Wales part of The Commonwealth of Australia in good faith.
By:……………………………………………… Seal: ……………………
Occupant of The Office of Steward/Executor
____________________________________________, Estate
By way of: General Post-Office
Private Suite: One hundred and sixty [160]
In care of: Four [4] Young Street Neutral Bay
Original State: New South Wales
The Commonwealth of Australia
Near: [9998]
This affirmation is autographed and sealed by One’s hand, is said to be true, correct, and
complete; and is hereby witnessed and recorded by Me as The Occupant of the Office of Justus
of the Peace on the original State known as Queensland part of The Commonwealth of Australia
on this day: one-six-three-four-three (Julian Date) __________________ in good faith.
……………………………………………………………………………
The Occupant of the Office of Notary Public [A40258]
For and behalf of the Court of Faculties of Her Royal Majesty
Queen Elizabeth the Second Lawful Sovereign of
The Commonwealth of Australia.