Under existing guidelines, the schools will no longer qualify for federal funding because they have fewer than 50% of their students enrolled in the free and reduced-lunch program, according to Leah Sokolofski, who supervises the program for the district.

Berkeley has an international reputation for its edible schoolyards, where public school children of all economic means learn what it takes to grow a radish and sauté some chard. Such funding cuts to the program, whose total budget is $1.94 million a year, would represent a significant setback in the city’s pioneering efforts to date.

School gardening and cooking champion Alice Waters, whose Chez Panisse Foundation helped fund the Edible Schoolyard at Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School, expressed dismay at the potential budget cuts to programs. “It’s inevitable cuts will come — people think these programs are dispensable and the state of California is in a financial crisis — but it’s a tragedy,” she said.

Waters recently raised over $500,000 to launch the Edible Schoolyard Project (ESP), an online resource that shares curriculum and best practice principles for garden and cooking programs with schools around the country. ESP has affiliate programs in San Francisco, Los Angeles, New Orleans, and New York. “We have to continue to make the case for why an edible education is so important to the health of every child and the health of the whole country,” she said.

BUSD school garden and cooking programs are funded through September 2012 through Network for a Healthy California, a state program that distributes federal monies to local school districts through a three-year grant. The network seeks to improve the health of low-income Californians through increased fruit and vegetable consumption and daily activity.

Changes to funding

Changes to the way school cooking and gardening programs are funded are coming down the track, however, following the passage of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, which President Obama signed into law amid much fanfare in December 2010, with the goal of improving childhood nutrition.

“Until the new guidelines for eligibility are released we just don’t know what’s in store for our school programs,” said Sokolofski, who anticipates hearing later this month. “This is the biggest change in the funding for these programs in 11 years.”

Further complicating matters: The U.S. Farm Bill is up for reauthorization in 2012. Potential changes to funding priorities there may impact all the BUSD’s gardening and cooking programs as well. “The Farm Bill is yet another wild card because that’s the overall place where our funding comes from,” explained Sokolofski. “And any changes there could trump changes elsewhere. There are a lot of unknowns right now.”

While it’s possible that funding for these programs could remain intact, for now the immediate concern is the three schools who will likely not qualify for federal funds for the next school year, Sokolofski said.

Sharing the pleasures of an outdoor table at Berkeley's Malcolm X Elementary School

Sokolofski has been sharing her concerns with school administrators, principals, parents, and teachers. A recent presentation at Malcolm X spurred dozens of parents to attend the March 7 BUSD board meeting, where they made a passionate case for protecting a program beloved of both students and adults.

Malcolm X parent and family doctor Shannon McCune, a Malcolm X alum herself, sees many young children in her practice and said she can immediately tell which of her patients have gardening at school. “They have a favorite vegetable and know why they’re good for you,” said McCune, whose daughter recently taught her mom how to make kale salad by massaging the leaves with oil, which eliminates the need for cooking the fibrous vegetable. “I would never have known how to do that if my daughter hadn’t shown me.”

Another physician-parent echoed McCune’s sentiment. Mickey Adams, a parent from Washington Elementary, talked about the challenges of working with adult patients who have obesity and other lifestyle diseases. “These people don’t know how to eat well and cook food — they’ve never been taught,” said Adams, whose children make recipes at home they’ve learned in school cooking classes. “These programs work and there will be so much damage done by cutting them and we’ll all pay on the other end.”

If kids grow and cook it they will eat their greens

As a school board member noted at the March 7 meeting, the value of such programs was measured in a recent UC Berkeley study, which found that young students routinely exposed to fruits and vegetables through cooking and gardening instruction ate 1.5 more servings of produce a day compared with kids with fewer opportunities to dig in the dirt and work the stove at school.

School gardening teacher Joy Moore doesn’t need data to know the benefits such programs can bring. This kind of instruction gives young people alternative and innovative ways to learn, along with “skills for life,” said the long-time school food advocate.

School board president John Selawsky promised parents that the board will “see what it can do,” while acknowledging the challenging fiscal constraints already impacting the school district.

Malcolm X's school under the sky teaches more than just how to grow good food

For now, Berkeley schools are researching ways to sustain these threatened programs. “We’ve been looking at the possibility of grant funding, but most of the grants available are small and aimed at schools just starting a garden plot,” said Alexander Hunt, principal of Malcolm X. “We haven’t been able to find anything comparable to the $135,000 we stand to lose.”

Despite serving a growing group of children in need, Malcolm X’s free and reduced school lunch numbers stand at 46% of its student body. “Materials can’t replace the quality of programming currently being provided by our staff,” said Hunt. “It’s wonderful how these classes engage students in learning at the same time they impart the benefits of health and nutrition. They’re key to our students’ education.”

The Malcolm X PTA is also exploring whether a large corporation, local merchants, philanthropic individuals, or some other benefactor may step in to fill the void. It is also in the early stages of discussions with other PTAs about a collaborative effort to secure contributions. “The garden and cooking program at Malcolm X is beloved by the school community and the community at large,” added Hunt. “It’s sad to see that in the place where this school food movement started, we’re now going backwards trying to sustain these valuable programs.”

Sense of urgency

Malcolm X parent Marian Mabel noted a sense of urgency to secure funding for next year, which must be identified by June 30, when the school district’s budget is finalized. In addition, Mabel pointed out that not all the city’s schools currently offer these programs — Berkeley Arts Magnet, Cragmont, Jefferson, and Oxford don’t receive any federal funds for such instruction. These schools rely on parent volunteers, PTA funds, and other sources to fund programs at their sites, if they have them at all.

“Short term, these three schools need to fill these funding gaps,” said Mabel, “but long term we want to find ways to make these programs available and sustainable to every public school student in Berkeley.”

As for Waters, another ESP program is in the planning stages for Sacramento, a strategic move, she said, so that she would be “under the noses” of state legislators. Waters, whose foundation has gifted about $10 million to BUSD, mostly to the Edible Schoolyard at King, also hopes that the governor will convene a taskforce for edible education soon to address the healthcare crisis among school children.

A parent-led meeting open to the community to update interested parties about the problem and brainstorm ideas about potential solutions is scheduled for this coming Monday, March 26, at the Malcolm X library at 7 p.m. Malcolm X is at 1731 Prince Street. Parents will also prepare public comments for the school board meeting on Wednesday March 28, where they intend to keep this issue on the minds of school board members.

I did check in with the organization and received the following information: Last year the ESY budget was $564,608. Seventy-five percent of that went to support a full time staff of seven, one Americorps member, and several contract staff for additional programs such as parent and family classes, an annual Edible Education Academy and on-going curriculum development. Twenty-five percent of the budget went to operations and supplies.

Roberta

How much does it cost to run the Edible Schoolyard program
at Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School?

3rdGenBerkeleyan

Cragmont pays the Garden teacher out of the PTA budget…Money Raised by BERKELEY FAMILIES.

MXParent

Malcolm X had almost (if not totally) 100% response to the free/reduced lunch applications. The demographics have shifted. There aren’t as many disadvantaged children in a city where homes cost upwards of $500K.

EBGuy

O believe me, they do. We’re at one the schools not at 50%; now I understand why they were pushing so hard to have everyone fill out the forms.

Cammy

Exactly what I thought. But I think parents or the parent/guardian responsible has to make under 30 K a year combined, which perhaps isn’t that common.

Berkeley Parent

Interesting, since Thousand Oaks recently dropped below the 50% free/reduced lunch student enrollment threshold. Wouldn’t its cooking and gardening program then be threatened as well?

Carolyn

Why not make the push to increase subscriptions to the free/reduced meals at these schools?
It is all connected.

Sarah Henry

Berkeley Parent and Luna:

The focus of this story was the imminent threat to funding of three elementary cooking and gardening programs in the BUSD, namely Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and Washington, who currently receive funding through the Network for a Healthy California, as do Emerson, John Muir, Le Conte and Thousand Oaks.

What about Thousand Oaks? Does it qualify for the funding or not? (It has a garden and has had a cooking program.) For some reason it is not mentioned at all in the article. Thank you.

Sarah Henry

Cammy and Chris:

As noted in the story, Cragmont, Oxford, Jefferson and BAM do not qualify for funding under the Network for a Healthy California guidelines, which means they do not have 50 percent or more of their student body receiving free or reduced lunch. It’s my understanding that they aren’t able to fund cooking and gardening programs in their schools at the level of the NHC-eligible schools.

I can’t speak to what each of these schools are doing currently in great detail, but in reporting this story I did learn that in the past BAM offered some cooking to some grades through parent volunteers and PTA funds and it’s my understanding that Cragmont has a PTA-funded Americorps member who provides gardening instruction.

Chris

I’d like to know as well.

Cammy

According to this article, other Berkeley schools, like Cragmont Elementary aren’t affected and will not lose their garden program (I don’t know if they have cooking). Why is that? Does Cragmont qualify because they have more than 50% of students in free/reduced lunches? Perhaps Ms. Henry can address this.

Anonymous

It doesn’t take a lot of money to run these nice little programs that the kids love. We should pass, I don’t know, maybe a parcel tax and use the money to fund stuff like this. Oh wait….

EBGuy

Whoops. Looks like the lottery is working a bit too well (evenly
distributing the socioeconomically disadvantaged students). The irony is
that the cooking and gardening programs helped make these schools more
desirable. For reference, eligibility for free/reduced meals was 43.6%
district wide (41.6% countywide). It may also be a sign that more affluent parents are now less likely to go private if they don’t get their first choice in the lottery.

Tim

Maybe a group of restaurants can agree to set aside a portion of their profit once a month for the program, and diners can increase their patronage on those days. It’s working for Albany schools and Little Star Pizza. Shouldn’t be too hard to organize.

Luna

I would like to remind that Thousand Oaks Elementary too has a wonderful program and a great cooking instructor: Michael Bauce. The kids love him! And he has done a lot for the school.
He was also featured on SFgate