iron_city_ap:I haven't smoked weed in close to 20 years. Is it bad that I like almost every movie on this list?

I smoked weed three times in my life, also close to 10-15 years ago and of the ones I've seen, I too like almost all of them. In fact, Clerks, The Big Lebowski, and Dazed and Confused are some of my favorite comedies ever.

I thought Your Highness was universally panned. Maybe this is what swayed him

It's not quite a stoner movie, but "River's Edge" would make my list for the Feckweed alone. (RIP, Dennis Hopper)As an added bonus, it features a very 'crispy' Crispin Glover in the best/craziest performance of his career. So, there's that.

I didn't get Dazed and Confused the first time I saw it. Now I love it. Great movie and probably Ben Affleck's best role as an actor. I've watched it so many times, I've lost count man.

That said, Up In Smoke was a movie solely dedicated to one thing- weed. And whatever other drugs they could get their hands on. But mostly, it's a love letter to weed. And it's pretty funny. I'd rank it much higher for this genre.

Your Highness doesn't belong on that list at all. Hell I'd rate one of the Friday sequels higher than that piece of garbage. I went in thinking it was going to be a silly low brow comedy, but they left out the comedy part. I honestly don't get how the hell they managed to get Natalie Portman for that flick. Not that I think she's a great esteemed actress, but I would have thought she'd be well above that level of suck.

Eh Dazed and Confused doesn't count as a stoner movie, it's just a movie set in a decade where they smoked. I don't think Fear and Loathing really counts either.

Whoever said How High is overrated, your opinion is bad and you should feel bad. I love that movie and I constantly tell people that ask me what that odd odor is when I walk in "oh that's just my cologne Cannaba for Men."

So pure stoner movies I'd say Lebowski, Cheech and Chong (not the one with the van, the one they go to Amsterdam), Pineapple Express, Harold and Kumar and How High. Not necessarily in that order.

Dingleberry Dickwad:I honestly don't get how the hell they managed to get Natalie Portman for that flick. Not that I think she's a great esteemed actress, but I would have thought she'd be well above that level of suck.

She was worse in Thor 1. Practically cardboard.I'm hoping for a better effort from her in Thor 2.

Kurmudgeon:Dingleberry Dickwad: I honestly don't get how the hell they managed to get Natalie Portman for that flick. Not that I think she's a great esteemed actress, but I would have thought she'd be well above that level of suck.

She was worse in Thor 1. Practically cardboard.I'm hoping for a better effort from her in Thor 2.

Honestly they should have just gotten rid of Portman entirely and used Kat Dennings in the role. Much hotter, much more personality.