Yearly average protectionagainst 0-day malware attacks

Security is built every minute of every day, year after year

We see 2-3 million malware detection reports every month. And our users are exposed to 350 thousand new malware and PUA (Possibly Unwanted Application) samples on a monthly basis.

With figures like this, it's easy to understand why it's important to have security software that really works. Even a small difference in protection and detection rates can have a huge impact.

We believe that consistency is the key to security, and that's why we invest in Live Security. Live Security is about combining the best of human expertise with state-of-the-art automated technologies to stay on top of all threats.

Reviews and Test Results

See what 3rd-party vendors and industry experts have to say about our solutions.

A cloud security solution that delivers a centralised web portal with support for an impressive range of systems and devices

“ F-Secure Protection Service for Business lives up to its name as it provides a complete security umbrella for all your systems and mobile devices. We found it simple to deploy, packed with features, and easily managed from its well-designed web portal. ”

ITPro evaluates the best antivirus solutions for 2017

“ Finnish firm F-Secure have been in the infosec industry a long time, and it shows. F-Secure's Client Security software managed to protect against all of the zero-days it was tested against, as well as 99.9% of common malware. It also scored well for performance, coming in well below the industry average for slowdown in most cases... ”

Best Detection Rate, F-Secure Client Security Premium

Rating of Advanced+ in AV-Comparative's File Detection Test, September 2016

The File Detection Test assesses the ability of antivirus programs to detect malicious files on a system. Typically, more than 100,000 malware samples are used for the test. These are prevalent malicious files of all types that have been recently collected, i.e. within a period of a few weeks or months before the test is performed.

Rating of Advanced+ in AV-Comparative's Performance Test, April 2016

The Performance Test evaluates the impact of anti-virus software on system performance, as programs running in background – such as real time protection antivirus software – use some percentage of system resources. Taking these tests as reference, users can evaluate their anti-virus protection in terms of system speed (system performance).

Rating of Advanced+ in AV-Comparative's File Detection Test, March 2016

The File Detection Test assesses the ability of antivirus programs to detect malicious files on a system. Typically, more than 100,000 malware samples are used for the test. These are prevalent malicious files of all types that have been recently collected, i.e. within a period of a few weeks or months before the test is performed.

Rating of Advanced+ in AV-Comparative's File Detection Test, September 2014

The File Detection Test assesses the ability of antivirus programs to detect malicious files on a system. Typically, more than 100,000 malware samples are used for the test. These are prevalent malicious files of all types that have been recently collected, i.e. within a period of a few weeks or months before the test is performed.

The retrospective tests evaluate the products against new and unknown malware to measure the proactive protection capabilities (e.g. through heuristics, generic signatures, etc.). This test also takes into consideration the false positive rate. Starting from 2012, the remaining malicious files are also being executed, so that the proactive protection provided by e.g. behaviour blockers is evaluated.

Rating of Advanced+ in AV-Comparative's File Detection Test, March 2014

The File Detection Test assesses the ability of antivirus programs to detect malicious files on a system. Typically, more than 100,000 malware samples are used for the test. These are prevalent malicious files of all types that have been recently collected, i.e. within a period of a few weeks or months before the test is performed.