Killing People, Growing Trees, and the Jews

THE PART of the Jewish race that interfaces with us is very clever, having an average intelligence that surpasses our own. But it’s a cleverness that frequently presumes too far, and the quality of the Jewish race that most characterizes them is their presumptuousness. It shows in their writing.

I recently reviewed a book by two Jewish professors: Daniel Chirot, who teaches sociology at the University of Washington, and Clark McCauley, who teaches psychology at Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania. In that book, you can see where two intelligent men treat the subject of genocide as if their taste, their preferences, in the matter were decisive over all of the pertinent moral considerations.

Indeed, it’s worse than that. Chirot and McCauley presume, implicitly — meaning that they don’t say so, but you can tell from the attitude revealed by their message — that their evinced preferences regarding right and wrong define morality itself, whereas to the contrary morality evolved among humans by the process of natural selection.

Further, they don’t even seem to be aware of their own bias.

Allow me to emphasize “seem to be.” These authors are academic Jews, and such persons have demonstrated to my own satisfaction that they are capable of treating a sociological treatise as though it were a stage play, in which they parade ideas that they want other people to adopt, even though they don’t believe those ideas themselves.

There are levels of duplicity that most White people never even dream of.

But it isn’t just Chirot and McCauley. The late Jewish astrophysicist Carl Sagan wrote a science fiction novel, Contact, wherein there is a dialogue between a human and a being from a very advanced civilization:

“Don’t think of us as some interstellar sheriff gunning down outlaw civilizations. Think of us more as the Office of the Galactic Census. We collect information. I know you think nobody has anything to learn from you because you’re technologically so backward. But there are other merits to a civilization.”

“What merits?”

“Oh, music. Lovingkindness. (I like that word.) Dreams. Humans are very good at dreaming, although you’d never know it from your television. There are cultures all over the Galaxy that trade dreams.”

“You operate an interstellar cultural exchange? That’s what this is all about? You don’t care if some rapacious, bloodthirsty civilization develops interstellar spaceflight?”

“I said we admire lovingkindness.”

“If the Nazis had taken over the world, our world, and then developed interstellar spaceflight, wouldn’t you have stepped in?”

“You’d be surprised how rarely something like that happens. In the long run, the aggressive civilizations destroy themselves, almost always. It’s their nature. They can’t help it. In such a case, our job would be to leave them alone. To make sure that no one bothers them. To let them work out their destiny.”

If you are alert for such things, you can spot the Jewish streak in Sagan here. Besides the expected faux-historical dig at the German National Socialists, there’s this presumption that “aggressive civilizations destroy themselves,” i.e., that expansive energy is somehow intrinsically lethally poisonous.

Of course, expansiveness can be dangerous if while expanding a civilization antagonizes another, more powerful civilization. It has then bitten off more than it can militarily chew. That’s why National Socialist Germany fell. Adolf Hitler had underestimated the thoroughness with which the Jews controlled the governments of England, the United States, and the Soviet Union.

But civilizations obey a certain law, recognized by Oswald Spengler. They either expand, or they decline. They never remain stagnant for long. Stasis is merely the moment that precedes decline.

Civilizations on the same world are like trees growing in proximity. Not all of the trees that seek the sun will get it: Some of them will lose the growth-race, will be over-topped and forever doomed to the shade.

But if it were possible for one of the trees to convince all of the other trees that growing taller as fast as they can is an evil thing, and so instill among them a moral aversion and a guilt-motivated restraint, then this clever tree would reduce the competition to itself and be more likely to become the highest tree, putting its neighbors in its own shadow.

5 Comments

I am so tired of hearing this, considering the number of Jews i have meet over the years.

We have over 500 million white people on the planet

Out of that number we have 10 times as many intelligent white then Jews.
Proof?
Look at all the invention and explorers out there, we crush all other races in this area. Not even a contest.
Over half the things Jews take credit for are lies or out right thefts of white inventions.

They are clever, have no moral restraint, and have good in-group preference.
That is why they are so successful at taking control, not because they are super intelligent or even slightly smarter then us.

It is ignorance and brain washing that gives them their biggest advantage today, not intelligence.

Still nice work and good points. i just get tired of hearing that “they are smarter then us” BS.

They are smarter than us in terms of infiltration, manipulation, deception and nepotism. Besides, they have no shame or moral restraints. That is the ideal formula for a successful parasitic ethnic Mafia.

Our main weaknesses are that we are too naive and cannot imagine a group of people who devote their entire existence to deception.
Once we lose our innocence and naivety and start acting in our collective interests, we can beat them.

We are constantly told that, both Jews & Asians have higher ,..AVERAGE,.. intelligence than Europeans,..But,yet, it is the European, WHITE race that have been the,..CREATIVE,..force for progress, down through history, having produced the world’s highest levels of civilization.

It is the European,..WHITE,..race that has produced the world’s greatest,..architecture,.. paintings,..sculpture,..literature,..& music. It is the White race that explored & mapped the world, in magnificent sailing ships, powered by the wind, & guided by the stars & the magnetic compass.

It is the European White race that has been the creative force that has brought today’s world of science & techknowlogy into being.

So,..’averages,..tell us nothing,..In that the continent of Africa has the ,..highest,..’average’,.. elevation of any continent,..but every other continent has ,..higher,..peaks than the highest peak. in Africa.
Africa’s high,..average, elevation..is based on the fact that much of Africa is composed of a plateau averaging about 5,000 in elevation, but Africa has only one peak, with eternal snows.

And, so it is, that while the Asians might produce a lot of engineers, it is the White race that has produced the world’s greatest inventors,..& while the Jews might produce a lot of lawyers, it is the WHITE race that has produced the world’s greatest thinkers & artists.

It is the WHITE European race that is the flower of nature’s creative force, & no other race comes even close,..

IQ tests don’t measure creativity, they only measure the processing of information (i.e. “understanding”). Jews may be better in manipulating of information and East Asians may be better in amassing information than Whites, but they are inferior in creating new ideas. Thus Jews and East Asians may very well have IQs somewhat higher than Whites, while being less creative than them.

Not only are growth and will infected with noxious deluding affective self-sabotage; but injured states of mind and soul are falsely counseled into grey areas of mediocrity and resignation. One is encouraged; or cowed, into accepting the dung matzo of oligarchic kikeocracy, as if it were a personal subjective victory. The many grey clarinet tones of irrational condescension.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (check box).

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.