A Major Political Disaster?Obama's
Attack on the Catholicsis by definition also an assault on
Hispanics (If you don't need the
fundamentals stuff, scroll down to "The Hispanic Factor"
subhead, though the K.K.K textsection just previous to
it is both absolutely true and downright fascinating.)

February 9, 2012 --
You've seen the eruption on the net, the "Mainstream"
Media (which may after this no longer fit that
designation) and in the conservative press from the
internet to FOX. The Obama Administration (with
the support of its fellow travelers in Congress, plus
their media and academic community) has allowed
bureaucrats to write the regulations for ObamaCare
(socialized medicine). Just this week, millions
of American Catholics have been told that the tax
funding from the general coffers they,
and all other American taxpayers, have previously been
forced to provide for abortion in the U.S.A. will
begin to expand into the internal activities of the
church. Catholic hospitals, among other church
organizations are the targets here..
Employee health insurance, for example, which includes
certain pregnancy-related pharmacy items like
day-after pills, not previously supported by the
faith, will be mandatory.

Reports of internal White House scrambling to find a
way out of this mess without losing femi-nazi and
other Progressive sector election support are true.

That,
folks, though the Democrats are denying it, is a
direct secular socialist attack on the
Constitutional protection of religious belief in
this nation. It is a direct thrust against
the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. As
this magazine has been saying for years, and
conservatives have been saying since Barry Goldwater
-- to name a famous early example -- the philosophy of
collectivism
(Liberalism/Progressivism/Socialism/Communism/Fascism)
is pure secularist stuff. Anti-religious
stuff. Hitler hated Jews, Stalin and Mao hated
and suppressed all religions, Portions of Islam
despise Jews and Christians. "Modern" Democrat
leaders and their judicial appointees have long worked
to degrade and diminish freedom of religion in this
nation.

In America, their efforts have resulted in attacks via
the Supreme Court. Their invention of
"separation of church and state." With the support of
the MSM and our liberal-dominated educational system,
they've made a great deal of "progress," so far.

Why do
Liberals despise the Constitution?

It's simple. The founding fathers put our basic
freedoms in God's hands because a deity can't be
reached by a king. They all came from places where
religion was controlled by a king or emperor, and
wanted the State out of that arena, permanently.
Secularists have plotted and schemed for years to
destroy the God Connection, and bring our basic
freedoms under their control. Get rid of
God and the Constitution, and they're in charge of
religion, free speech, the press and even the pursuit
of happiness.

Their goal is power. They want to have legal
control of everything, including you. How long have
the Democrats been doing this sort of thing, and has
it happened here in Oregon? Read this:

--------------------------------------------------------------

The Ku Klux Klan dominated state politics in
the early 1920s.

OMED: Which is why Democrats were
politically powerful. Check out the following.

OLCOTT, Ben, 1919-1923 (Republican Oregon
governor) Fearful of lawlessness associated with
a fast growing Ku Klux Klan in Oregon, he denounced
the Klan on May 13. 1922, just six days before the
primary election. (Modern "historians," attempting to
spread KKK blame over to the Republican Party, write
that he "jeopardized his chances in the Republican
primary" by doing it.) Olcott won the primary by
a few votes, but in the general election faced Democrat
Walter Pierce, who advocated a Klan supported
anti-Catholic Compulsory School Bill and who was
also the K.K.K. candidate. Olcutt opposed the
school bill; denounced the Klan; and lost the election
99,164 votes to Pierce's 133,392.

OMED: That's right. Republicans put an
anti-K.K.K. candidate up for the general
election. The Democrat in that gubernatorial
election was also the official candidate of the
K.K.K. When discussing this
blatently bigoted period in Oregon history, Mr. Uris
forgot to mention that little item. He's an
educator, you know. Their job is to help you
understand things. Well, it used to be their
job, anyway. At least you now understand the
reason for the politically "generic" approach to
racist Oregon history Mr. Uris selected in his
Portland Tribune essay. An accurate portrayal of the
situation would have enraged a great many of his pals.

--------------------------------------------------------------
The above text section is from an Oregon
Magazine piece published years back. Here is a
link to the entire piece: (It's a long read, so you
might finish this one before going to it.)

http://oregonmag.com/OregonRacismTrib.htmlWhy do Oregon and national
secularists do this sort of thing? Because the
power they want to achieve cannot be gained until God
is Dead. That's why this political philosophy
has in the past been called "totalitarianism." The
current government of North Korea is
totalitarian. The current government of Cuba is
totalitarian. Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's
Italy and Hirohito's Japan were totalitarian.
Russia during both the Czarist era and the Communist
era which followed was totalitarian. Of late,
demonstrators have appeared in the open at the
Kremlin. They are demanding free and honest
elections. Like the Chinese fellow in front of
the tanks, we won't be surprised to find that they,
like him, have entered the government agricultural
profession.

In America, for decades, the once-patriotic and
freedom-loving Democrats have been working for the
same kind of power. Here's another link, another
rather long read, about that:

To achieve their goal,
much of which has already been accomplished, was in
part quite simple. The link above will explain all
that. But, the final victory, the complete
sublimation of freedom in America was and remains very
difficult. It has to do with the U.S.
Constitution -- in this case the portions of that
document which install limitations on the power of
government, and the way political power is distributed
and transferred in this nation. The last of
these, in particular, is what this essay is about.

We think with this Catholic/abortion thing Obama and
the secularists just made one of the biggest mistakes
in American political history. Ready? Here
we go:

The Hispanic
Factor

You know that roughly eleven million (11,000,000)
illegal aliens (called "immigrants" by the
politically-correct American Left) have come to
America in recent decades. Being a reader of
this magazine, and so probably a follower of FOX TV
and conservative radio stars like Rush Limbaugh, you
know that the "modern" Democrat leaders love Hispanics
because whether legal or illegal, they vote for
liberals. Government programs, welfare, food
stamps, financing into higher education by the
feds, ACLU legal protection, sanctuary cities,
etc., etc., etc.

You also know that, as in the case of black voters
(99% of African-Americans voted for Obama), they can
count on the Hispanic vote with one exception.
Cuban immigrants (legal when they reach America
because they have escaped from totalitarian nations)
do not in bulk support (socialist/communist/fascist)
rule, having actually lived in such places.

Which brings us to the new ObamaCare socialized
medicine regulations that this week raised a storm
across the nation.

There is something else you know about
Hispanics. So far, it hasn't been mentioned in
the MSM -- or even in the conservative media -- as far
as I have seen. Most of them are Catholics.
Visualize a scene where a local parish priest tells a
gathering of people who speak little, if any, English,
and have no knowledge of civics, that the Obama
government is attacking their religion.

Since our readers have working brains, and because I
personally don't give a damn about the Marxist dupes
who run Oregon, these days, I will not have to
explain why the term "Catholic" in the paragraph just
above presents a potential disastrous problem for the
secularist powers-that-be in November of this year.

But, sharing my opinion with my fellow conservatives
is fun, so I'll put a capper on this essay. I
think the "modern" Democrats have just shot themselves
in their own foot with this one.

Postscript:
Around 9:00 A.M, Pacific time, today (2/10/2012) Obama
said he is changing the setup to one that will satisfy
Catholic leaders. He will order the insurance
companies to provide the birth control and related
services and products for free. The church
doesn't have to pay for them. This is pure
B.S. Any service or product offered by any
private company in America contains all the expenses
of the company from taxes to labor costs to "free"
items like this one. Since, unlike the
government, they can't spend more than they make, the
"free" services will be spread to all insured persons
by raising the basicpolicy price. Since
Catholic organizations will be part of this system,
they will still be funding practices and products to
which they object. Obama's "change" is nothing more
than deception. A change that isn't a change
isn't a change. On top of all that, according to a
battery of conservative pundits we've read, both
versions of Obama's mandate here are
unconstitutional. He does not have the power to
require either method. (Or won't until a
majority of stupid Americans return him and our
present Senate to power this coming November.
You should join or found a Tea Party group and do
something about that.)