Thursday, February 02, 2017

The Democratic National Committee is kicking a candidate out of the chairmanship race after he told The Hill that Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) should not be the party’s next leader because he is a Muslim.

In a Jan. 5 email to The Hill, Vincent Tolliver, a former House candidate in Arkansas, said that Ellison, the first Muslim elected to Congress, should not be chairman because of Islamic positions on homosexuality.

“His being a Muslim is precisely why DNC voters should not vote for him,” Tolliver wrote. “Muslims discriminate against gays. Islamic law is clear on the subject, and being gay is a direct violation of it. In some Muslim countries, being gay is a crime punishable by death.”

“Clearly, Mr. Ellison is not the person to lead the DNC or any other organization committed to not discriminating based on gender identity or sexual orientation,” Tolliver continued. “I'm shocked [the Human Rights Campaign] has been silent on the issue. A vote for Representative Ellison by any member of the DNC would be divisive and unconscionable, not to mention counterproductive to the immediate and necessary steps of rebuilding the Democratic Party.”

The Hill did not report on the remarks in early January because it was unclear whether Tolliver would be an active candidate for chair. However, on Saturday, Tolliver participated in the DNC-sanctioned candidates forum in Houston. The DNC announced on Tuesday that Tolliver would also be one of 11 candidates participating in the next forum in Detroit on Feb. 4.

But Tolliver is no longer invited to participate in the event.

"The Democratic Party welcomes all Americans from all backgrounds. What we do not welcome is people discriminating against others based on who they are or how they worship," interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile said in a statement to The Hill.

I look forward to seeing the Democratic Party endorse both "love wins" and "gravity wins". And maybe, just maybe, we will get Bannon 2024!

OT, but in other news, there was that disgraceful riot at Berkeley where they shut down Milo. I think he should go on a deliberate (but unspoken) "Please, Shut Me Down Tour" of all the major asswipe universities, and collect hours and hours of delightful footage of these animals revealing their true colors. Never actually get to speak anywhere, just collect a lot of primo propaganda for later use.

"The Democratic Party welcomes all Americans from all backgrounds. What we do not welcome is people discriminating against others based on who they are or how they worship," interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile said in a statement to The Hill

Unless they are "white boys", then it is essential that they not be allowed to win, or so the 20th Century version of Donna Brazille said.

Ellison / Brazille for Co Chairs of the DNC! It's time for the white boys to step aside and learn from their moral superiors! Because doubling down is so 20th Century, it's time to Triple Down.

I look forward to seeing the Democratic Party endorse both "love wins" and "gravity wins".

"the Democratic party's game plan for winning back blue collar whites"

They don't want to win back blue-collar whites, they want to outnumber them, replace them, and eventually murder them. (But first, of course, 'mugamba'.)

I like the little dance the spokeslady did about "how they worship", viz. not "what they believe." Muslims don't hate Christians because they genuflect and stuff, they hate them for what they believe. But, since SJWs always lie... well I guess that is lying by omission, but could we add a corollary, SJWs always obfuscate?

A little OT, I know, but the Alt-Right should celebrate with raucous laughter when the idiot trash on the left do our recruiting for us. By all means have and express sympathy for the innocent victims of lefty oppression, but don't forget to celebrate. Every outbreak of criminal excess like this is a win for us. This is the loony left's equivalent of Hellfire missiles at a Kurdish wedding.

Here's hoping Ellison gets the spot and finds a die-hard Muslim to run against Trump in 2020...I'm reliably informed that Islam is no different than Christianity and Americans are dying to see a 7-year-old Fourth Lady wearing a burka at the inauguration.

One of the reason why Muslims are so screwed up in the head is sexual. The Muslim woman must be a virgin for marriage. But during dating the man wants sex. So they do ass sex. It is filthy but it keep the woman a virgin. The Muslim man like this and this can be done with men too. And a lot of Muslim men turn gay because kit is much easier to find a man to fuck in the Muslim world than it is a woman.

"What we do not welcome is people discriminating against others based on who they are or how they worship,"

I imagine Brazile saying this to a wall with that dead-eyed buffalo stare. Hillary sure knows how to pick them. Because nothing says goodthink like stating you hate the very raison d'etre of your Party and your Career. Tell us more about how future presidential addresses will finish each line with "Inshallah," Donna.

acushla wrote:I like the little dance the spokeslady did about "how they worship", viz. not "what they believe." Muslims don't hate Christians because they genuflect and stuff, they hate them for what they believe. But, since SJWs always lie... well I guess that is lying by omission, but could we add a corollary, SJWs always obfuscate?

No. SJWs always lie. Spokesladies always obfuscate.

llsepher wrote:If you cant discriminate between a jug of acid, and a jug of water, you wont live long.

Discrimination is essential to a healthy life, to say nothing about a healthy organization. I'm going to go out on a limb and say the Dems are fucked.

At least they aren't being hypocritical about what they want for America?

sqeekie wrote:The Left and Islam are headed for a collision. Guess who will win?

Islam. The Left only hates themselves, not everyone. (They only project it onto us.)

"The Democratic Party welcomes all Americans from all backgrounds. What we do not welcome is people discriminating against others based on who they are or how they worship," interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile said in a statement to The Hill.

Yeah. Let's compare the percentages of Muslims and Christians beheaded by Daesh with the percentage Obama accepted as refugees.

17. Robert Browning February 02, 2017 3:37 AM"One of the reason why Muslims are so screwed up in the head is sexual. The Muslim woman must be a virgin for marriage. But during dating the man wants sex. So they do ass sex. It is filthy but it keep the woman a virgin. The Muslim man like this and this can be done with men too. And a lot of Muslim men turn gay because kit is much easier to find a man to fuck in the Muslim world than it is a woman.

Why don't those young Muslim women give their fiance's BJs? Just as quick and they don't have to take off any clothes. Is it because they're even more selfish than American women, or because too many Muslim men don't reliably shower?

What we do not welcome is people discriminating against others based on who they are or how they worship

So is that a flat-out denial of, or merely refusing to address, the Islamic position on homosexuality? The umma don't fuck around with "conversion therapy", they jump straight to extermination policy. It's only the Western adherence to the rule of law that prevents them doing it here (though I suspect that somewhere in France or Sweden or elsewhere in the EU, this sort of thing has happened, but there's no fake Matthew Shepherd angle, and they won't risk "making more terrorists" by reporting it).

DNC doubling down should help with keeping Trump voters in the fold and recruiting new Trump voters among the white middle class, female and white working class and Hispanic male voters assuming Trump's policies bring jobs.

The outlier for me is uni educated white women. The more education a white woman has, the more likely she is to vote against whites and in favor of globalist and invaders. So, how do we get more white women to see that their self interest is not in virtue signaling against whites but to join whites? The recent pussy hat march doesn't suggest there is a lot of opportunity here especially given how much they love to love Muslims and Islam. that applies to white uni educated women in the US and Western Europe. Maybe we have to do it without them but if we can turn them it will be a crippling blow in the near term to the left.

The first time a woman admits she's wrong on an emotional issue would probably cause a universal matter implosion and a new Big Bang, so we really shouldn't try it.

You don't have to get her to admit she is wrong. All you have to do is give her an out. "When I supported the movement it was full of peaceful, kind Muslims like Ahmed. Now it's full of violent Mohammads." It's a way for them to shift positions without admitting they empowered barbaric, psychopaths.

Tolliver's most sublime line was this: "...counterproductive to the immediate and necessary steps of rebuilding the Democratic Party.”

There it is in his own words. An explicit admission that President Trump demolished the Democrats. How amusing to watch them hang bunting on the smoking rubble and declare it an architectural masterpiece.

OT: Revealed: Detroit business owner LIED when he claimed Trump's travel ban caused his sick Iraqi mother to die Michigan man Mike Hager falsely claimed his mother fell ill while in Iraq and later died because she was not allowed to return to the US to...http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4181808/Business-owner-claimed-mom-died-ban-lied.html

Sounds like we are still winning. Btw, I've posited that the white democrats will break to form their own party (and they very well may); however, the key requirement of "socialism" (like libertarianism) even in it's crudest "paper only" form, requires a homogeneous society--let's just say white.

Whites (like Nordics) are the ONLY people interested in all this stuff and selling it in the US, where it will be clear these White (W-DNC) dems will be working their ass off to provide shit for minorities isn't going to work any more than it has the last 200 years.

I still could see some white dems breaking off--they won't SAY it's a racial Bloc, but it will be.

I look forward to seeing the Democratic Party endorse both "love wins" and "gravity wins

NYC will be underwater by 2015 and the artic will have no ice by 2013 so the plan is being thrown off buildings won't be bad for those who can swim. No more need to put "no blacks" in the grindr profile.

winning back blue collar whites by convincing them to pay the jizya because colonialism.

Welfare counts as jizya.

If you cant discriminate between a jug of acid, and a jug of water, you wont live long.

You must not live in the US, the rest of the world has kinder eggs, chocolate with toys inside. Hell we can't even get black moms to not put lead fishing sinks in their kids mouths for lead paint payouts.

r because too many Muslim men don't reliably shower?

In basic training when forced to shower on a regular basis blacks didn't have the smell blacks always have.

So, how do we get more white women to see that their self interest is not in virtue signaling against whites but to join whites?

Telling them moslem rape statistics only gives them hope some one will want their dried up goods.

Obama destroyed the Democrat party, not Trump

The thought they were undefeatable destroyed them because they let their true selves show

My fear was that someone like Biden would take the role of elder statesman with no further political ambitions and say he would only take the job for two years, to give the party time to sort itself out and to do his best to hold the line in the Democrat party hell-on-earth that is the 2018 Senate midterms.

But hey, if they want to go with the durkadindu from Mogadishu-on-Mississippi, that's their business. On the bright side, they won't have to worry about losing the Senate seat from WV because it will have already explicitly defected.

There needs to be planted journalists to pepper newly elected DNC chair Ellison with questions about his personal views on gay marriage, Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel, on and on. The "real journalists" certainly won't ask those questions.

This portends to be great. Winning apparently has no ceiling or floor.

I think it will come up, eventually Robert. There will be a schism in the DNC, eventually some whites will leave to form some other liberal party, which will flounder.

I'm still banking on the Dems running a double minority for both Prez and VP in 2020. This Kamala Harris gal looks like a "good" candidate for the Left--straight outta California, black and Indian or something.

At least one Dem gets it, nails the problem dead-on accurately, and they eject him from leadership contention, even though the first step in any problem-solving is to correctly identify the actual problem. The Dems double down on the virtue-signaling, meaning at least one more election-cycle in the wilderness. It's hard to call it "winning" when the opposition self-destructs by its own choice, and its sad they demonstrate that half the nation is delusional and insane, but a forfeit still goes in their "loss" column.

@27 - That will make siphoning off working-class whites easier. If Trump can get some high-profile union job wins to get a significant portion of them over to the Alt-Right, it is going to leave a mark in the electoral college that won't buff out.

@28 - Ask them if they are glad they are outnumbered by non-white men who immigrate. Tell them the Swedes are doing great now that they have 127 young men for each 100 women in their late teens, so in spite of the huge increase in gang rapes by "refugees" there are a lot more opportinities to find an assertive Mr. Right.

It is very difficult to convey to many Americans just how incompatible multi-culti is with just about every other value of the West. My sister, who is a moderate Republican and my brother in law, who is a moderate democrat, are cases that illustrate this. They are very strongly "open borders" advocates, including Muslims, and simply do not understand that the values of Islam are incompatible with the values of both women's rights and tolerance of sexual minorities (for lack of a better term), both of which they very strongly support. When I told them of this, they said that not all Muslims are "political" as they put it and that Islam is mostly about "clean living". If their attitudes are representative of many Americans, and I think they are, then there is no question in my mind that we face a long, rocky road ahead.

Max Keiser is going to run as a Democrat in N.C.It will be interesting to see what he makes of the party- whether he is successful or not.I think he lives inside of his head too much to realize what these idiots are doing, and what a threat it can be to him.

“I'm shocked [the Human Rights Campaign] has been silent on the issue. A vote for Representative Ellison by any member of the DNC would be divisive and unconscionable, not to mention counterproductive to the immediate and necessary steps of rebuilding the Democratic Party.

Shocked, he is. In similar shocking news, major feminist groups worldwide have no problems with the religion of love and peace. Like all SJWs - they lie, they project and they double down. Leftists lie about everything. Feminism is one of better examples of these root-level lies. The official objective of the feminists is to make lives better for the average female, endlessly echoed throughout (((fake news))), (((fake schuls))), and (((fake companies))) for over a century. The average female's life has not been objectively improved in any way by the racket, despite decades of blind support. Wasn't it Camille Paglia who characterized the whole movement as a small bauble buried in the middle of an enormous pile of shit? The actual objective of feminism is to destroy the marriages, families and children of white Christians. Hence the total silence of Swedish and other feminists about Musloids and the rapefugees. (((Barbara Lerner Specter))) determines what Swedish feminists stand for.

Moving on to the typical Marxoid antifa idiot - you never hear them complaining about one-percenters like (((Soros))) or (((Bloomberg))), do you? Only about 'white privilege' or maybe the Koch Brothers (and now of course Trump).