The Missoulian Editor Blog (see what I did there?) last week posted an “excellent policy” about crediting other news agencies in reporting. It’s an interesting look at the difficulties of giving proper credit in the lightning fast world of modern media, but errs heavily on the side of acknowledging the work of other news agencies. Perhaps the most important part of the new policy? Full attribution, no matter the original source:

The policy addresses two kinds of situations:

? Attributing to other organizations information that we haven’t independently reported.

? Giving credit to another organization that broke a story first, even when we match it — or advance it — through our own reporting.

Attributing facts we haven’t gathered or confirmed on our own:

We should provide attribution whether the other organization is a newspaper, website, broadcaster or blog; whether or not it’s U.S. based; and whether or not it’s an AP member or subscriber.

The past week has demonstrated the importance of this policy. While a lot of the original reporting about the despicable nature of the Montana Tea Party was from John Adams at the Great Falls Tribune, blogs did a lot of the initial discovery of Facebook postings and other messages. Other than a brief throwaway line in the Independent Record today about “many online blogs,” the reporting work done by blogs breaking these stories has received little mention.

It’s unfortunate. Failing to attribute the original sources is not only suspect ethically, it undermines credibility of reporting. It matters if a story is broken by a partisan blog—and stories should reflect that.

This isn’t personal. I don’t break a lot of news here, as this is primarily a commentary site, though a couple of instances of failed attribution still sting just a little bit. Other sites, though, both left and right, have broken, researched, and reported Montana stories well before the media got to them, and the mainstream media owes the same courtesy to blogs that blogs extend to them.

If you appreciate an independent voice holding Montana politicians accountable and informing voters, and you can throw a few dollars a month our way, we would certainly appreciate it.

About the author

Don Pogreba

Don Pogreba is an eighteen-year teacher of English, former debate coach, and loyal, if often sad, fan of the San Diego Padres and Portland Timbers. He spends far too many hours of his life working at school and on his small business, Big Sky Debate.
His work has appeared in Politico and Rewire.
In the past few years, travel has become a priority, whether it's a road trip to some little town in Montana or a museum of culture in Ísafjörður, Iceland.

66 Comments

Participate in this conversation via emailGet only replies to your comment, the best of the rest, as well as a daily recap of all comments on this post. No more than a few emails daily, which you can reply to/unsubscribe from directly from your inbox.

Well that is good news for the Republican party in Massachussetts. The Republican party has been a dying breed there for years so any boost for the Republicans there would be great. The bad news for the cons and the neo cons is that Brown supports health care reform and is on board with most of the national trend as far as many issues go. A decent left of center perspective is vital for the party to grow. However, I personnally think that is a good thing. Republicans need people like him, Snowe, Collins, the midwest populist(s) and the center left wing on the west coast if they want any chance to win back the executive in 2012. Good Luck to Them !!

You are aware of our current status in this world. Read the article i linked under my last comment to you, and you imediatly will be able to provide people like Adam to organise your fractions against judaism there in North America. What we allover this planet have to do is with intellect and without quarter unite us in arms to save humankind from extinction

My husband and i ended up being absolutely cheerful that Jordan could deal with his survey out of the ideas he acquired in your site. It is now and again perplexing to simply possibly be giving away thoughts which often a number of people might have been making money from. So we realize we need the writer to be grateful to for that. The type of illustrations you have made, the easy web site menu, the relationships you can make it easier to create – it’s everything astonishing, and it’s really facilitating our son in addition to our family believe that the matter is satisfying, which is certainly extremely essential. Thank you for the whole thing!