Logical Reasoning Ability

I have known Mr.Avvijit Tandon as my student for the past one year.He is basically a creative person, always trying to present his ideas in a creative manner. He has a good logical reasoning ability and will always try to solve problems efficiently. In addition,he has demonstrated excellent powers of observation, and has the ability to communicate and suggest changes that were effective upon implementation.

From the beginning of the course,he began to re-define our expectations of a good student leader. He regularly discussed with his fellow students about the subjects and brought in new ideas. Without prompting or precedence he spent several days working odd hours on his projects . Along the course he had an excellent sense of perception about the other subjects too, and improving the flow from one subject to the other and one concept to another concept - all to the great praise of both the staff and the fellow students in his class. He had also observed something about a common aspect of the learning process that was applicable to all subjects at our department. He has written several assignments on our subjects, some of which have been excellent. He is always valued for his contribution and the skill and sensitivity with which he presented his ideas.

Mr.Avvijit has also demonstrated his logical and analytical abilities in last one year. Being the COST ACCOUNTING teacher for Mr.Avvijit, I have seen him grow in communicative abilities tremendously over the last one year. His attentive listening and great enthusiasm has helped him overcome any language limitations. He is both self- confident and independent, and has a great sense of humor that has helped him form strong relationships peers, and members of our staff.

In all of these areas, Mr.Avvijit has gone beyond expectations, and has out-shined all others in his peer-group at our college. He is a very admirable and ambitious person. I have no doubt that he will be a serious and enthusiastic student,...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...communication (Dryzek, 2003, p. 20).
Ideal speech does not take place
Some of the most insightful critiques of ideal speech have come from feminist theory. Fraser (1985), for example, argues that rational discourse ignores women’s oppressed group status. The determination of a person’s right to speak within a discourse is a socially constructed act and some women in some cultures are limited in their actions. The goal of communicative consensus assumes that individuals are capable of working together towards consensus, however it fails to recognise the fact that certain groups in society are not given equal status and power (Fraser, 1985, p. 114). Another feminist critique is that ideal speech assumes only the relative importance of reasoning and rational understanding, and is silent on the role of feelings and emotions. Feminists believe that understanding and consensus cannot be achieved unless feelings and emotions are also considered and given equal weight. Griffiths (1988, p. 147) says feelings ‘reflect both factual and evaluative judgments’ and thus, should not be overlooked.
Another argument is that it is impossible for there to be a consensus on values and consequently, discussions would go on indefinitely. This argument is based on the premise that people have varying personal interests and vastly different conceptions of the world and of social norms. These differences arise out of the many cultural, religious, social and historical practices...

...bilities — Physical AbilitiesAbilities that influence strength, endurance, flexibility, balance and coordination
Dynamic Flexibility — The ability to quickly and repeatedly bend, stretch, twist, or reach out with your body, arms, and/or legs.
Dynamic Strength — The ability to exert muscle force repeatedly or continuously over time. This involves muscular endurance and resistance to muscle fatigue.
Explosive Strength — The ability to use short bursts of muscle force to propel oneself (as in jumping or sprinting), or to throw an object.
Extent Flexibility — The ability to bend, stretch, twist, or reach with your body, arms, and/or legs.
Gross Body Coordination — The ability to coordinate the movement of your arms, legs, and torso together when the whole body is in motion.
Gross Body Equilibrium — The ability to keep or regain your body balance or stay upright when in an unstable position.
Stamina — The ability to exert yourself physically over long periods of time without getting winded or out of breath.
Static Strength — The ability to exert maximum muscle force to lift, push, pull, or carry objects.
Trunk Strength — The ability to use your abdominal and lower back muscles to support part of the body repeatedly or continuously over time without 'giving out' or fatiguing.
bilities — Physical...

...1) Charles doesn't tell Chig right away about his plan to visit his family. This idea or implication can help in deducing an inference of Charles’s feelings about the visit. For instance, when someone doesn’t tell right away about his/her plan to visit a certain location, he/she doesn’t really seem filled with excitement, anticipation, or even happiness. As a result, there could be a critical or momentous reason for doing that such as having the presence of a conflict or enigma. Similarly, Charles doesn’t really seem filled with rapture and joviality toward visiting his mom. This idea can be clearly supported by the sentence depicted in story that we have studied which is : “something new and almost ugly had come into his eyes : fear, uncertainty, sadness, and perhaps even hatred.” In fact, there was another inducement or reason behind all of that which can be depicted by the following locution: “When people experience a misunderstanding, a confrontation may be helpful because it helps in resolving even the most complicated enigmas and dilemmas since confrontation is a momentous guideline in reaching the prosperous objective. And as they say progress can’t be made without a conflict.” Obviously, there was the presence of an unresolved conflict between the mother and her son Charles. Consequently, Charles confesses about the conflict that has been stirring inside his chest. He tries to find a solution for his dissatisfaction when he visits his mom.
2) Chig’s...

...validity of the material and/or beliefs. They choose to live their lives not questioning or seeing obvious discrepancies because they do not want to believe there could be any other truths. They can also rationalize their beliefs further by convincing themselves that since a whole group of people believe it, it must be the truth. Another factor comes in when they are too scared to question what they believe. "What if I looked further and found out everything I have ever held as my truths just did not make any kind of rational sense? What would I do then?" As this is much too painful for them, it is never really going to be an option. They want to believe what brings them comfort and faith, even if there is no physical evidence or logical scientific reasoning to the things they believe. Never questioning will, in their minds, lead them to what they want....

...﻿
Facing Life While Fighting For an End
Tabitha Price
Ashford University
Course: PHI208: Ethics and Moral Reasoning
Instructor: Rachael Howell
4/7/2014
Facing Life While Fighting For an End
Every one of us will stare down the face of death at some point in our lives; however, some will face it in much more unpleasant circumstances then others. We all have a right to choose what we want to do with our bodies. We even have the right to decide that we no longer wish to endure the pain and suffering of a terminal illness. Terminal illness is when someone is suffering from something that will eventually take their life regardless of any medical interventions. In this paper I will discuss the point in which a person has a right to decide if they want to die and what processes are ethically moral in aiding them in seeing their wishes come to fruition.
Medicine has created more ways to cure or to minimize a person’s suffering from diseases that were once fatal or painful. Medical technology has given us the power to sustain the lives of patients whose physical and mental capabilities cannot be restored, whose degenerating conditions cannot be reversed, and whose pain cannot be eliminated. As medicine struggles to pull more and more people away from the edge of death, there are pleas for relief outpouring from the tortured, deteriorated lives that all of us be merciful and give them the relief they need. (C Andre, and M Velazquez, KND).
When a...

...The Nature of Reasoning
What is Reasoning?
 a mental act whereby starting with several judgments which we relate to one another.
 the process which uses arguments, statements, premises and axioms to define weather a statement is true or false, resulting in a logical or illogical reasoning.
 the process of using a rational, systematic series of steps based on sound mathematical procedures and given statements to arrive at a conclusion.
 the cognitive skills with which we reach sound conclusions in order to make decisions and solve our daily life problems.
In logicalreasoning, an if-then statement (also known as a conditional statement) is a statement formed when one thing implies another and can be written and read as "If P then Q." A contrapositive is the conditional statement created when negating both sides of the implication and can be written and read as "If not Q, then not P." Anything that is not proven is known as a conjecture.
In today’s logicalreasoning three different types of reasoning can be distinguished, known as deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning and abductive reasoning based on respectively deduction, induction and abduction.
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning originates from the...

...CTS Placement Paper January, 2010 (ReasoningAbility) REASONING section (20 Q's - 20 mins) Directions for Questions 1-4: In each questions below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. read the conclusion and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer: (A) if only conclusion I follows; (B) if only conclusion II follows; (C) if either I or II follows; (D) if neither I nor II follows and (E) if both I and II follow. 1.Statements : Most clocks are fans, Some fans are walls Conclusions : I. Some walls are fans II. Some clocks are walls Ans: D 2. Statements : All birds are dogs, Some dogs are cats Conclusions : I. Some cats are not dogs II. All dogs are not birds Ans: D 3. Statements : Some fools are intelligent, Some intelligent are great Conclusions : I. Some fools are great II. All great are intelligent. Ans: D 4. Statements : All Men are married, Some men are educated Conclusions : I. Some married are educated II. Some educated are married. Ans: E Directions for Questions 5-6: In each questions below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. read the...

...TITLE
The Effects of Mind Puzzle Games to Nonverbal ReasoningAbility among College Students.
HYPOTHESIS
Mind puzzle games has no significant effect to nonverbal reasoningability of college students.
CONTROL VARIABLE: Educational Attainment
RANDOM VARIABLE: Gender and Age
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Mind Puzzle Games
DEPENDENT VARIABLE: Nonverbal ReasoningAbility
BACKGROUND OF THE TOPIC
Nonverbal tasks involve skills such as: ability to recognize visual sequences and remember them, understanding the meaning of visual information and recognizing relationships between visual concepts, performing visual analogies; and recognition of causal relationships in pictured situations. (learningdisabilities.about.com)
A study published in Brain and Cognition (Volume 46, 2001, pp. 95-179) showed that the elderly performed significantly poorer on the Towers of Hanoi puzzle than younger subjects.
Carroll’s (1993) analyses of the fluid reasoning factor show that it, in turn, is defined by three reasoningabilities: (a) sequential reasoning (verbal, logical, or deductive reasoning); (b) quantitative reasoning (inductive or deductive reasoning with quantitative concepts); and (c) inductive reasoning (typically measured...