http://archive.monthlyreview.org/index.php/mr/issue/feedMonthly Review2015-03-02T08:37:45-08:00Monthly Review Archivesno-reply@monthlyreview.orgOpen Journal SystemsThis site contains nearly all articles published in <em>Monthly Review</em> since its inception in May 1949. Current subscribers can access content free of charge. Learn more about <em>MR</em> <a title="Monthly Review" href="http://monthlyreview.org/about" target="_self">at the main website</a>.http://archive.monthlyreview.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-066-10-2015-03_0Notes from the Editors, March 20152015-03-02T08:37:44-08:00- The Editorsmonthlyrevieweditors@mrsite.org<div class="buynow"><a title="Back issue of Monthly Review, March 2015 (Volume 66, Number 10)" href="http://monthlyreview.org/back-issues/mr-066-10-2015-03/">buy this issue</a></div>From its earliest years, <em>Monthly Review</em> has been distinguished among socialist publications by the degree to which it has incorporated environmental views into its fundamental perspective. Paul Sweezy's 1950 article, "An Economic Program for America"&hellip;listed conservation of natural resources and the elimination of destructive waste as two of the primary goals in the development of socialism. He called for the socialization, long-term planning, and conservation of "coal&hellip;oil and natural gas and all the other fuels which provide the lifeblood of modern industrial society." Scott Nearing's monthly column "World Events," written for <em>MR</em> from the early 1950s to the early 1970s, regularly examined environmental, along with political-economic, developments. Nearing was a socialist economist and environmentalist.&hellip; With the publication of Rachel Carson's <em>Silent Spring</em> in 1962, Nearing explored its wider ecological implications, contending that civilization had entered the "phase of suicidal destructivity&hellip;. Without doubt man has built a pyramid of potential destructivity&hellip;. Man is a destroyer as well as a builder. He has exterminated entire species&hellip;. He has destroyed forests and opened the soil to erosion. He has engaged in fratricidal wars that have wiped out one civilization after another and presently threaten to end western civilization" (Nearing, "<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14452/MR-014-07-1962-11_5" target="_blank"><span class="hyperlink">World Events</span></a>," <em>Monthly Review</em>, November 1962).<p class="mrlink"><p class="mrpurchaselink"><a href="http://monthlyreview.org/index/volume-66-number-10" title="Vol. 66, No. 10: March 2015" target="_self">Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the <em>Monthly Review</em> website.</a></p>2015-02-28T00:00:00-08:00Copyright (c) 2015 Monthly Reviewhttp://archive.monthlyreview.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-066-10-2015-03_1A Rational Agriculture Is Incompatible with Capitalism2015-03-02T08:37:44-08:00Fred Magdofffredmagdoff@mrsite.orgFrom humanitarian and ecological viewpoints, many aspects of the capitalist economic system are irrational; although they are certainly rational from the more limited standpoint of the individual business or capitalist seeking to make profits.&hellip; With regard to the environment there are scores of examples of irrational behavior by capitalist businesses that have the ultimate goal of making profits. Many practices and side effects of the way the system functions degrade the ecosystem and its processes on which we depend and may also directly harm humans. For example, it is not rational to introduce chemicals into the environment, including into products we use daily, that are either toxic or cause illnesses of various types. Yet there are over 80,000 chemicals used in the United States; few of them are tested for their effects on people or other species, and many commonly used ones are suspected to be carcinogens or have other detrimental effects.<p class="mrlink"><p class="mrpurchaselink"><a href="http://monthlyreview.org/index/volume-66-number-10" title="Vol. 66, No. 10: March 2015" target="_self">Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the <em>Monthly Review</em> website.</a></p>2015-03-01T00:00:00-08:00Copyright (c) 2015 Monthly Reviewhttp://archive.monthlyreview.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-066-10-2015-03_2GMOs: Capitalism's Distortion of Biological Processes2015-03-02T08:37:44-08:00Michael Friedmanmichaelfriedman@mrsite.orgLast summer, astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson was asked to comment on the furor surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs). He responded with the assertion that humans have been genetically modifying organisms for millennia, giving us food crops such as seedless watermelons or corn. This process, he stated, is little different from genetic engineering.&hellip; Tyson's first mistake lies in his equation of artificial selection and genetic modification, reflecting common misunderstandings of both the sources of genetic variation and the distinction between the latter and mechanisms of evolutionary change. Tyson's second mistake is his failure to see the bigger picture. The dynamic of capital accumulation is fundamentally at odds with ecosystem dynamics. And technology, in our society, is the handmaiden of capital accumulation. This article will elaborate on these distinctions and discuss some of the basic biological processes underlying GMOs and their potential risks, especially risks of dispersal. It will then examine how capitalism molds the technology and accentuates the risks.<p class="mrlink"><p class="mrpurchaselink"><a href="http://monthlyreview.org/index/volume-66-number-10" title="Vol. 66, No. 10: March 2015" target="_self">Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the <em>Monthly Review</em> website.</a></p>2015-03-02T00:00:00-08:00Copyright (c) 2015 Monthly Reviewhttp://archive.monthlyreview.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-066-10-2015-03_3Bangladesh&mdash;A Model of Neoliberalism: The Case of Microfinance and NGOs2015-03-02T08:37:44-08:00Anu Muhammadanumuhammad@mrsite.orgIn 2006, a few months after the Nobel Peace Prize for Muhammad Yunus and Grameen Bank was announced, I was visiting Germany [where many] Germans&hellip;looked at it as a victory over neoliberalism. One German activist theatre group invited me to the show of their latest drama, Taslima and the Microcredit. The show was eye opening for me: I realized to what extent Grameen Bank had been misunderstood in the West, and how media campaigns and public relations activities, including embedded studies, created a myth around the Grameen Bank and Yunus.&hellip; The theatre organizers requested me to join a discussion following the show. Standing before a mesmerized audience, I had to tell them the hard truth with facts and figures. I said that, despite their best wishes, they were making a terrible mistake. Grameen had never been an alternative to the World Bank-pushed neoliberal economic model; rather, it was born and brought up as a necessary supplement to it.<p class="mrlink"><p class="mrpurchaselink"><a href="http://monthlyreview.org/index/volume-66-number-10" title="Vol. 66, No. 10: March 2015" target="_self">Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the <em>Monthly Review</em> website.</a></p>2015-03-03T00:00:00-08:00Copyright (c) 2015 Monthly Reviewhttp://archive.monthlyreview.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-066-10-2015-03_4The Personal Is Political: The Political Economy of Noncommercial Radio Broadcasting in the United States2015-03-02T08:37:44-08:00Robert W. McChesneyrobertwmcchesney@mrsite.orgIn this essay, I look at the problems facing progressives and those on the political left in the United States in participating in political analysis and debate in mainstream journalism and the news media. I focus on radio broadcasting, as this is where much of political discussion takes place in the United States. Radio broadcasting is the least expensive of the media for production and reception, is ubiquitous, has adapted itself to the Internet, and is uniquely suited for locally based programming.&hellip; I look specifically at my own experience hosting a weekly public affairs program on an NPR (National Public Radio)-affiliated radio station in Illinois from 2002&ndash;2012. This was, to my knowledge, the only NPR series hosted by a socialist in the network's history.<p class="mrlink"><p class="mrpurchaselink"><a href="http://monthlyreview.org/index/volume-66-number-10" title="Vol. 66, No. 10: March 2015" target="_self">Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the <em>Monthly Review</em> website.</a></p>2015-03-04T00:00:00-08:00Copyright (c) 2015 Monthly Reviewhttp://archive.monthlyreview.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-066-10-2015-03_5Cricket and Revolutions: C.L.R. James's Early British Years2015-03-02T08:37:45-08:00Yasmin Nairyasminnair@mrsite.org<div class="bookreview">Christian H&oslash;gsbjerg, <em>C.L.R. James in Imperial Britain</em> (Durham: Duke University Press, 2014), 294 pages, $24.95, softcover.</div>The <em>London Times</em> once referred to the famed Trinidad-born C.L.R. James as a "Black Plato." When asked about the phrase, James elliptically deflected it with a graciousness that should be noted, but the problems with being able to conceive of black intellect only within parallels within Western thought could take up pages. Christian H&oslash;gsbjerg's new biography of James focuses on his first years in Britain, from 1932 to 1938, and skillfully avoids either fetishizing his subject or reducing him to a glorious "black brain." The result is a riveting history that is bound to awaken the interest of those unfamiliar with him and add a dimension to what others already know of his life and work.<p class="mrlink"><p class="mrpurchaselink"><a href="http://monthlyreview.org/index/volume-66-number-10" title="Vol. 66, No. 10: March 2015" target="_self">Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the <em>Monthly Review</em> website.</a></p>2015-03-05T00:00:00-08:00Copyright (c) 2015 Monthly Review