I had seen the previous photo analysis, done by Steve
Lacey (8/31/05) on the RENSE.com site [http://www.rense.com/general93/batofla.htm],
as well as some done by others, and felt they were very interesting, but
thought no more about them. Since I had never had the quality photo original
that others had managed to obtain, until it appeared online, nor have I
been able to determine who took it, owns it, or has rights to it, though
it was originally published through Associated Press.

Consequently, I had never bothered to do any "photo
analysis" of my own; as I never deemed it necessary. All that was
important to me was that there was definitely "something" stopping
the light beams from the searchlights, from going off into infinity. That
alone is proof of there having been an object being fired upon.

But one day I looked at it again, and a bell went off!
In the past I had never been able to discern a "recognizable"
shape in any of the pictures before, and then it hit me: I had seen that
shape before, knew exactly where, and what ship it was!

So for the 2010 Edition of my book on this historic event,
I will for the first time reveal my "ultimate conclusion", based
on what I feel is the best evidence to date: that not only was this an
UFO, but it is now an IFU: Identified Flying Object!

The object in question, is what infamous contactee Billy
Meier has labeled, a "Variation-IV, Pleadian Beamship", that
he not only photographed, but photographed in almost the exact position
as the photograph taken in 1942!

"Variation-IV, Pleadian Beamship"

Photo 1

Photo 2

Photo 3

Take a good look at Photo 1. Now take that photo, and
utilizing any photo editing software, turn into a "reverse" or
"negative" image, such that instead of being lit by the sun from
overhead, the image now appears to be at night, lit from underneath as
in Photo 4.

Photo 4

Now combine the images, isolating the ship from its background,
and adding it as another layer, and reduce its opacity to suit, for me
at about 40%, and combine the images, as in Photo 5.

Photo 5

As you can clearly see, it is an almost perfect match!
Even though the two pictures were taken decades apart, with different cameras,
in different countries, by different people, it is clear that someone has
allowed these photos to be taken for a reason! (My full composite is on
the cover of the new edition)

Photo 6

I am sure that many people will find cause to not believe
their eyes, and conclude that this is all an elaborate fraud, but it is
the best evidence you are likely to find, that not only did the United
States military shell an alien spacecraft over Los Angeles in 1942, but
the pictures that Billy Meier has been allowed to take, are indeed authentic,
and that both incidents were staged, not by Earth humans, but by these
"Pleadian visitors", if that is indeed where they are indeed
from; though we have no way of proving, or disproving what they say, and
so far have no reason to doubt what they tell us.

However, in light of a constant barrage of propaganda
films, the message has always been clear: spaces aliens are bad guys!

First of all I do not know why, all of a sudden, there
is so much interest in this story, that there are actually THREE "Battle
of Los Angeles" movies dueling with each other. First it was the movie
"Skyline" last year, there is a direct-to-DVD movie "The
Battle of Los Angeles", and the coming big release of Sony Pictures
"BATTLE: LA".

The reason for this "aliens are to be feared"
propaganda is a matter of human history. In no instance, has the superior
human power not taken advantage of, and shown merciless cruelty toward,
the weaker power. We are living in a age of near constant warfare. The
rich have always exploited the poor, and continue to this day. As of yet,
we have no robot slaves, so we still enslave other peoples. Slavery has
been integral to human civilization, as we know it, since the beginnings
of our species, which begs the question: Are we really truly civilized
now?

The fear of invasion is one we have lived with throughout
our history, and is a legitimate concern, considering we no longer even
have a Space Shuttle, much less a Starship Enterprise (unless you believe
"Stargate SG-1"), and won't even be able to maintain the International
Space Station much longer (such a waste). We also have no way to retrieve
all of NASA's other space garbage.

There can be NO higher power than the US government,
its allies, enemies, and the Judea-Christian-Islamic church, who all want
to keep us under their control, even if it means killing us. It simply
won't be allowed, without a fight. So they have given us 50-plus years
of negative propaganda towards alien species, to justify the endless human
warfare, an endless sparing match as practice for the big day when we unite
to fight a common enemy. But it seems we may wipe each other out before
that happens. It's called "stuck on stupid"!

There is little fiction of humanity living in the future,
without having survived a truly planet destroying war, which would send
us back to the Dark Ages, if not the Stone Age ("The Fintstones,"
without slave dinosaurs). In fact, there are no (known to me) positive
sci-fi movies/TV shows of people living in the future on Earth at all (please
don't say "Back to the Future")! Having grown up on "The
Jetsons," I always considered it a great (though ridiculous) example,
until a cartoon in the "LA Weekly" some years back pointed out
that they are never shown on the ground, on Earth, because it is waste
dump, so they must live (like gods) in the sky ("Astro Boy").

So here we are with a choice, just like in the (propaganda)
television show "V: the series" (remade).

Which choice will you make? Trust the aliens, or trust
your government/religion? Will they usher in a new age, or enslave us?
They are waiting patiently for an answer. It s obvious to me they don't
want war, as we will be destroyed in any fight. If they are going to enslave
us, what are they waiting for? Frankly, I am tired of the debate.

As part of this "ultimate conclusion," I am
submitting two additional photographic animations. The modern-day Los Angeles
photos (which were sent to me by Prof. C. Scott Littleton, who appears
in the book, as a living eyewitness) are alleged to be from the location
where the original "1942 battle" photo was thought to have been
taken. Though this area, called Baldwin Hills, is populated now, back
then it was (and still is) an oil field.

It seems to me, that the original 1942 photo was cropped
from a larger picture; which indicates the photographer was further away.
I have taken the 1942 photo and superimposed it onto the modern day landscape,
in a manner thought to be consistent of the original 1942 photograph, and
then placed the Meier photo into the scene, at the size that matches those
two photographs, to create a reconstruction of what people may have seen,
had the ship flown over in daylight, and had they been paying attention.
Note that the lighting of the Meier craft also matches that of the modern
daylight scene, though neither photographer knew I would be matching these
photos. (1942-1976-2010: intervals of 34 years. Compute that!)

Photo 7

Photo 8

It may be that the craft was actually further away, but
based on my current reconstruction (which may or not be correct), it appears
to have been rather close; considering the craft is said to be only 10
meters in diameter, and given the angle of the search lights, not that
high in the air.