Well, yes and no. To be sure, it's not a trivial amount of work, but I'd just anchor the whole thing on Africa (sense 75% of the data is from there) and by the time the fossils start showing up in Asia and then Europe the continents themselves are awfully close to their current positions, it's more coast-line changes due to sea elevation, etc that is altering appearances. So you might be able to ignore fossil locality motion altogether if you're at all lucky (and probably have minimal movement, even if not) and just have to worry about showing how the continents move position during the long tenure of our ancestors in Africa, and just continue the animation of the coast lines during more recent history.