Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices
The Cushing Refinery Sites, Cushing,
OK
The Corpus Christi Petrol Terminal Site,
CC, TX
The former wood treating facility,
Texarkana, TX
The former wood treating facility,
Kansas City, MO
The former wood treating facility,
Springfield, MO
The former wood treating facility, Rome,
NY
The former wood treating facility,
Avoca, PA
The Riley Pass Mine Site, Harding
County, SD
The former wood treating facility,
Indianapolis, IN more than 50 former
uranium mines and mills, including
Shiprock, Churchrock, and Ambrosia
Lake on and in the vicinity of Navajo
Nation, NM, AZ
The White King/Lucky Lass mine site,
Lakeview, OR
The Toledo Tie Site, Toledo, OH
The Welsbach Gas and Mantle Site,
Camden, NJ
The former Federal Creosote facility,
Manville, NJ
The former Moss American Site,
Milwaukee, WI more than 1800
current and former service stations in
twenty-four states
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Consent Decree and
Settlement Agreement. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and either
e-mailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611, and
should refer to In re Tronox,
Incorporated et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–
09688. Commenters may request an
opportunity for a public meeting in the
affected area, in accordance with section
7003(d) of RCRA,42 U.S.C. 6973(d).
The Consent Decree and Settlement
Agreement may be examined at the
Office of the United States Attorney, 86
Chambers Street—3rd Floor, New York,
New York 10007. During the public
comment period, the Consent Decree
and Settlement Agreement may also be
examined on the following Department
of Justice Web site: http://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree and Settlement
Agreement may also be obtained by mail
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by
faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Nov 26, 2010
Jkt 223001
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $53.25 (213 pages,
exclusive of signature pages and
attachments; 25 cents per page
reproduction cost) or $123.75 (495
pages, including signatures and
attachments) payable to the U.S.
Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward
a check in that amount to the Consent
Decree Library at the stated address.
Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–30027 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–CW–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,599]
Innovion Corporation, Gresham, OR;
Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On March 31, 2010, the Department of
Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of Innovion Corporation,
Gresham, Oregon (subject firm). The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on April 19, 2010 (75 FR
20382). The workers supply ion
implantation services for firms in the
semiconductor industry.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that there was no shift to/
acquisition from a foreign country by
the workers’ firm of services like or
directly competitive with the ion
implantation services supplied by the
subject firm and no increased import by
either the subject firm or its major
declining customers of services like or
directly competitive with the ion
implantation services supplied by the
subject firm [Section 222(a)]. Further,
the workers are not eligible to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) as
adversely affected secondary workers
[Section 222(c)] or workers of a firm
identified by the International Trade
Commission as a member of a domestic
industry injured under a provision of
the Tariff Act of 1930 [Section 222(f)].
The initial investigation concluded
that worker separations were
attributable to a customer’s decision to
perform ion implantation services inhouse instead of using the subject firm.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73131
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department sought
clarification from the subject firm’s
headquarters and conducted an
expanded customer survey of the
subject firm’s major declining
customers, including those identified in
the request for reconsideration.
Information provided during the
reconsideration investigation confirmed
no shift to/acquisition from another
country by the subject firm in the
supply of ion implantation services, and
no increased imports of ion
implantation services, or like or directly
competitive services, by the subject firm
during the relevant period.
The customer survey conducted
during the reconsideration investigation
showed that, during the relevant time
period, the three largest declining
customers of the subject firm did not
import services like or directly
competitive with the ion implantation
services provided by the subject
workers.
Together, the surveyed customers
accounted for 92 percent of subject firm
sales in 2007, 89 percent of subject firm
sales in 2008, and 84 percent of subject
firm sales during the first four months
of 2009. Those customers also
accounted for 109 percent of the sales
decline of the subject firm from 2007 to
2008 and 97 percent of the subject firm’s
sales decline during the first four
months of 2009 as compared with the
same period of 2009.
The assertion that the subject firm
should be certified as a result of the
certification of customer LSI Logic
(TA–W–55,958; certified on November
3, 2003) was not investigated on
reconsideration because a shift to a
foreign country by a customer cannot be
a basis of certification absent under
Section 222(a), which requires that there
has been a shift to a foreign country by
the subject firm. Further, the
certification of the Chandler, Arizona
facility (TA–W–71,648) cannot be the
basis of certification of workers of the
Gresham, Oregon facility as adversely
affected secondary workers because the
certification of the Chandler, Arizona
facility was based on the satisfaction of
Section 222(c) and Section 222(c)
requires that the primary firm be
certified under Section 222(a).
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the
original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of Innovion
Corporation, Gresham, Oregon.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
73132
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 228 / Monday, November 29, 2010 / Notices
Signed in Washington, DC, this 15th day of
November 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–29822 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
November, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,910]
Sypris Technologies, Sypris Solutions
Division, Kenton, OH; Notice of
Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
On October 7, 2010, the Department
of Labor issued a Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration applicable to the
request for administrative
reconsideration filed by the United Steel
Workers, Local 1–109, on behalf of
workers and former workers of Sypris
Technologies, Sypris Solutions
Division, Kenton, Ohio (subject firm).
The Department’s Notice was published
in the Federal Register on October 25,
2010 (75 FR 65514).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination that was based
on the findings that increased imports
did not contribute importantly to
worker separations at the subject firm
and no shift in production to a foreign
country occurred.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department
conducted an expanded survey of the
subject firm’s major declining customers
to supplement the information gathered
during the initial investigation. The
survey revealed increased customer
reliance on imported trailer axle beams
and that the increased imports had
contributed importantly to worker
separations at the subject firm.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained during the
reconsideration investigation, I
determine that workers of Sypris
Technologies, Sypris Solutions
Division, Kenton, Ohio, who are
engaged in employment related to the
production of trailer axle beams, meet
the worker group certification criteria
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. 2272(a). In accordance with
Section 223 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2273,
I make the following certification:
‘‘All workers of Sypris Technologies,
Sypris Solutions Division, Kenton, Ohio,
who became totally or partially separated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Nov 26, 2010
from employment on or after May 18, 2008,
through two years from the date of this
certification, and all workers in the group
threatened with total or partial separation
from employment on date of certification
through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.’’
Jkt 223001
[FR Doc. 2010–29823 Filed 11–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests: Public Demand
for Museum and Library Services
(PDMLS) Survey
Institute of Museum and
Library Services, The National
Foundation for the Arts and the
Humanities.
ACTION: Notice, request for comments,
collection of information.
AGENCY:
The Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
This pre-clearance consultation program
helps to ensure that requested data can
be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
By this notice, IMLS is soliciting
comments concerning a proposed
survey to collect information to monitor
the use, expectations of and satisfaction
with cultural programs and services,
most especially library and museum
services.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request can be obtained by
contacting the individual listed below
in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
January 22, 2011.
IMLS is particularly interested in
comments that help the agency to:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to: Carlos
Manjarrez, Associate Deputy for
Research and Statistics, Institute of
Museum and Library Services, 1800 M
St., NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC
20036. Mr. Manjarrez can be reached by
Telephone: 202–653–4671, Fax: 202–
653–4600, or by e-mail at
cmanjarrez@imls.gov, or by teletype
(TTY/TDD) for persons with hearing
difficulty at 202–653–4614.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Institute of Museum and Library
Services is the primary source of
Federal support for the Nation’s 123,000
libraries and 17,500 museums. The
Institute’s mission is to create strong
libraries and museums that connect
people to information and ideas. The
Institute works at the national level and
in coordination with State and local
organizations to sustain heritage,
culture, and knowledge; enhance
learning and innovation; and support
professional development. IMLS is
responsible for identifying national
needs for, and trends of, museum and
library services funded by IMLS;
reporting on the impact and
effectiveness of programs conducted
with funds made available by IMLS in
addressing such needs; and identifying,
and disseminating information on, the
best practices of such programs. (20
U.S.C. Chapter 72, 20 U.S.C. 9108).
II. Current Actions
Libraries and museums help create
vibrant, energized learning
communities. Our achievement as
individuals and our success as a
democratic society depend on learning
continually, adapting to change readily,
and evaluating information critically.
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73131-73132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29822]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-70,599]
Innovion Corporation, Gresham, OR; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On March 31, 2010, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers
and former workers of Innovion Corporation, Gresham, Oregon (subject
firm). The notice was published in the Federal Register on April 19,
2010 (75 FR 20382). The workers supply ion implantation services for
firms in the semiconductor industry.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the finding that there was no shift to/acquisition from a
foreign country by the workers' firm of services like or directly
competitive with the ion implantation services supplied by the subject
firm and no increased import by either the subject firm or its major
declining customers of services like or directly competitive with the
ion implantation services supplied by the subject firm [Section
222(a)]. Further, the workers are not eligible to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) as adversely affected secondary workers
[Section 222(c)] or workers of a firm identified by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry injured under a
provision of the Tariff Act of 1930 [Section 222(f)].
The initial investigation concluded that worker separations were
attributable to a customer's decision to perform ion implantation
services in-house instead of using the subject firm.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department sought
clarification from the subject firm's headquarters and conducted an
expanded customer survey of the subject firm's major declining
customers, including those identified in the request for
reconsideration.
Information provided during the reconsideration investigation
confirmed no shift to/acquisition from another country by the subject
firm in the supply of ion implantation services, and no increased
imports of ion implantation services, or like or directly competitive
services, by the subject firm during the relevant period.
The customer survey conducted during the reconsideration
investigation showed that, during the relevant time period, the three
largest declining customers of the subject firm did not import services
like or directly competitive with the ion implantation services
provided by the subject workers.
Together, the surveyed customers accounted for 92 percent of
subject firm sales in 2007, 89 percent of subject firm sales in 2008,
and 84 percent of subject firm sales during the first four months of
2009. Those customers also accounted for 109 percent of the sales
decline of the subject firm from 2007 to 2008 and 97 percent of the
subject firm's sales decline during the first four months of 2009 as
compared with the same period of 2009.
The assertion that the subject firm should be certified as a result
of the certification of customer LSI Logic (TA-W-55,958; certified on
November 3, 2003) was not investigated on reconsideration because a
shift to a foreign country by a customer cannot be a basis of
certification absent under Section 222(a), which requires that there
has been a shift to a foreign country by the subject firm. Further, the
certification of the Chandler, Arizona facility (TA-W-71,648) cannot be
the basis of certification of workers of the Gresham, Oregon facility
as adversely affected secondary workers because the certification of
the Chandler, Arizona facility was based on the satisfaction of Section
222(c) and Section 222(c) requires that the primary firm be certified
under Section 222(a).
Conclusion
After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of Innovion Corporation, Gresham,
Oregon.
[[Page 73132]]
Signed in Washington, DC, this 15th day of November 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-29822 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P