You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Seriously, I've got no clue what my type is - xNxx.

INFJ, or so I thought, but the more I read about INFJs and interact with them the more I realize I don't relate to them.
I have no idea if I'm an introvert or an extrovert, feeler or thinker, perceiver or judger. No idea if I use Fi or Fe, Ti or Te, Si or Se, Ni or Ne. I've read a lot about typing, I'm not a newbie by any means -- but the more I read the more mixed up the information gets in my head and now I'm positive I've just been overthinking it.
Which is why I need an outside opinion. Or many outside opinions. I'm really at a loss here, guys.
Here's what I do know: I'm a 4w3 sx-dom (not sure whether I'm sp or so secondary, I test equally.) and I'm an intuitive (I have plenty of sensor friends and the contrast is obvious, no disrespect to any sensors).

Here are my results on a variety of letter and cognitive function tests.

INTJ
Introvert(44%) iNtuitive(88%) Thinking(1%) Judging(11%)
You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
You have strong preference of Intuition over Sensing (88%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (11%)

Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Intuiting (Ni): Transforming with a meta-perspective. Withdrawing from the world and focusing your mind to receive an insight or realization. Checking if synergy results. Trying out a realization to transform things.

Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Thinking (Te): Measuring and constructing for progress. Making decisions objectively based on evidence and measures. Checking if things function properly. Applying a procedure to control events and complete goals.

If these cognitive processes don't fit well then consider these types: ENTJ, or INFJ

Please, if anyone could ask me some questions to differentiate between functions or whatever, I would really, really appreciate that. I have doubts about being an INTJ/INFP despite what the tests say, although I wouldn't rule either out completely.

iNtj // rlua|I|
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
for one moment,
i wish you'd hold your stage
with no feelings at all

Wow, you're all over the place! But no worries, I've also turned out to be everything from INTJ to ENFP at some point, and even though I'm now pretty certain of what I am, tests are still very ambiguous as to whether I'm a thinker or a feeler. Now, based on your function analysis, I'd say ENFP, and the fact that you're asking for input instead of insisting on figuring it out on your own says to me Idealist, not Rational. Second most possible is probably INFP. I get that feeling from the way you're expressing yourself; it's always possible to find some of the traits possessed by a person by looking at the first impression. Personally, I've always hit at least 50 percent correct on first impression, except from once when I was new to the system and I got only one letter correct. If I am to go with my gut feeling, I'll say INFP, but there's a fairly good chance that you are an Extravert. One x is okay in my opinion and I'm not quite sure of the I/E part, I'm just gonna say xNFP.

Wow, you're all over the place! But no worries, I've also turned out to be everything from INTJ to ENFP at some point, and even though I'm now pretty certain of what I am, tests are still very ambiguous as to whether I'm a thinker or a feeler. Now, based on your function analysis, I'd say ENFP, and the fact that you're asking for input instead of insisting on figuring it out on your own says to me Idealist, not Rational. Second most possible is probably INFP. I get that feeling from the way you're expressing yourself; it's always possible to find some of the traits possessed by a person by looking at the first impression. Personally, I've always hit at least 50 percent correct on first impression, except from once when I was new to the system and I got only one letter correct. If I am to go with my gut feeling, I'll say INFP, but there's a fairly good chance that you are an Extravert. One x is okay in my opinion and I'm not quite sure of the I/E part, I'm just gonna say xNFP.

I've tried doing it by myself, but at this point I've learned so much that I feel like an external opinion is required. Plus, it's good to have others' feedback, although not necessary.
I'm really not sure. Other people have said xNFP as well, but first of all I don't know whether I'm introverted or extroverted, and secondly, I'm not sure how to confirm xNFP either way.

Thanks, heh.

iNtj // rlua|I|
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
for one moment,
i wish you'd hold your stage
with no feelings at all

Now, as good as you are at talking back (which you are completely entitled to and I also think you're right) you suddenly seem a tiny bit INTP to me. As I said, I have no clear T/F preference and I'm not half as tough at defending my opinion. Give (F) or take (T) in discussions is one of the indicators in this variable.

Now, as good as you are at talking back (which you are completely entitled to and I also think you're right) you suddenly seem a tiny bit INTP to me. As I said, I have no clear T/F preference and I'm not half as tough at defending my opinion. Give (F) or take (T) in discussions is one of the indicators in this variable.

I don't know, perhaps. I've got a strong intellectual side, or so I like to think, and so I've never had a problem with logic or debate. In fact, I love debates as long as they have a purpose or it's about something I am knowledgeable about; I see no reason for a person to get offended by me challenging their opinion, because even with things that clash strongly with my values, I usually don't jump in all, "How can you say that, you terrible person?!" It's more like, "That's interesting - why do you think that?"
Of course, I have my own values as well. Values that I refuse to bend for other people; although I might pretend to agree with a person to avoid needless conflict, if something clashes with what I believe I most likely will challenge it and openly disagree with it. Honestly, some values are necessary for another person to agree with or they become near impossible for me to respect. I would, hypothetically, cut off contact with someone if they had values that greatly conflicted with mine.
And by values, I mean morals -- things like, "Same-sex couples should have the right to marry" (because they should be treated equally as citizens and not placed below straight couples or denied privileges or even a title) or "Women should be allowed to have abortions" (because it is the woman's body and nobody should be able to take the right to her own body away from her) or "Having a non-binary gender should be respected" (because not everyone fits into specific societal molds and they should not be shamed for that). Generally, I am a highly non-judgmental person. I would judge a person far more for lack of good character and ethics than I would for doing something unorthodox.

Yes, I'm aware that this post seems like I'm rambling, but I'm trying to give you guys something to help type me with, or something to provoke follow-up questions since nobody's really been asking me any :''''((((

iNtj // rlua|I|
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
for one moment,
i wish you'd hold your stage
with no feelings at all