The Geography of Violence Against Civilians: Implications for Peace Enforcement

Overview:

UN peacekeeping operations have evolved in recent years to include more robust missions that pursue peace enforcement in a way not previously seen. The central question of this report is: how does peace enforcement change where an actor targeted with intervention uses violence against civilians. The report finds that armed groups significantly reduce the area over which they target civilians. This has important implications for forces responsible for protecting civilians in peace enforcement missions.

Key Findings:

When faced with outside intervention, armed groups withdraw into the places where they have previously used violence against civilians rather than committing violence in new areas.

Given the finding above, troops and intelligence assets can be deployed in more concentrated areas, allowing intervening forces to develop better situational awareness, and respond to acts of violence against civilians more effectively.

Related Publications

Past research on business engagement with human rights, peace, and security has identified specific reasons why national and transnational companies may be interested in participating, as well as how they have contributed to protecting human rights

This white paper offers a synthetic review of empirical evidence on the elements of state governance that affect interstate and intrastate armed conflict. In the first part of the paper we examine state capacity and institutional quality.

How does the way in which a group organizes change the lethality of the group's attacks? In this article, we argue that groups organized vertically as hierarchies are likely to conduct more lethal attacks.

Pages

UN peacekeeping operations have evolved in recent years to include more robust missions that pursue peace enforcement in a way not previously seen. The central question of this report is: how does peace enforcement change where an actor targeted with intervention uses violence against civilians. The report finds that armed groups significantly reduce the area over which they target civilians. This has important implications for forces responsible for protecting civilians in peace enforcement missions.

Key Findings:

When faced with outside intervention, armed groups withdraw into the places where they have previously used violence against civilians rather than committing violence in new areas.

Given the finding above, troops and intelligence assets can be deployed in more concentrated areas, allowing intervening forces to develop better situational awareness, and respond to acts of violence against civilians more effectively.

UN peacekeeping operations have evolved in recent years to include more robust missions that pursue peace enforcement in a way not previously seen. The central question of this report is: how does peace enforcement change where an actor targeted with intervention uses violence against civilians. The report finds that armed groups significantly reduce the area over which they target civilians. This has important implications for forces responsible for protecting civilians in peace enforcement missions.