Fiscal Federalism in Nigeria

The question of an acceptable formula for revenue sharing among the component tiers of the Nigerian nation is one of the most protracted and controversial debates in the political and macroeconomic management of the economy. This debate has its foundations in the history and evolution of the Nigerian federation. “Revenue allocation or the statutory distribution of revenue from the Federation Account among the different levels of government has been one of the most contentious and controversial issues in the nation’s political life. So contentious has the matter been that none of the formulae evolved at various times by a commission or by decree under different regimes since 1964 has gained general acceptability among the component units of the country. Indeed, the issue, like a recurring decimal, has painfully remained the first problem that nearly every incoming regime has had to grapple with since independence. In the process, as many as thirteen different attempts have been made in devising an acceptable revenue allocation formula, each of which is more remembered for the controversies it generated than issues settled”

FISCAL FEDERALISM AND REVENUE ALLOCATION

FISCAL FEDERALISM Fiscal federalism refers to the scope and structure of the tiers of government responsibilities and functions as well as the allocation of resources among the tiers of government. Perhaps the most important issue of fiscal federalism is the revenue allocation formula, the sharing of national revenue among the various tiers of government (vertical revenue sharing) as well as the distribution of revenue among the state governments (that is, horizontal revenue allocation). The centralization of Nigeria’s fiscal federalism began with the report of the Dina Commission (1968) which argued that an appropriate revenue allocation system should result in a more equitable distribution of revenue among the states to achieve a balanced development of the federation.

Revenue allocation can be described as a method(s) of sharing the centrally generated revenue among the different tiers of government and how the amount allocated to a particular tier is shared among its components. Nigeria is a federal state – under the federal system of government, federation or centrally-generated revenue is shared among the three levels of government, namely; the federal government, the states and the local governments. The theory of revenue sharing in a federal state is that each level of government receives an allocation of financial resources tailored to their specific requirements as defined by the mandate of legislative competence, their actual situation and the statutory indices of calculation. In Nigeria, decisions as to what proportion of centrally-generated revenue that would be retained by the federal government, the proportion that will be shared among the state governments and the proportion that will go to the local government has always been a problem, due to the fact that there is no consensus of opinion as to what could be seen as an ideal formula.

CHAPTER 2

PRINCIPLES OF FISCAL FEDERALISM:The principles that guide the implementation of intergovernmental fiscal relations include: (a) The Principle of Diversity: The federal system must have the ability to accommodate a large variety of diversities. Hence, the fiscal system must provide scope for variety and differences to supply national, regional and local public goods. (b) The Principle of Equivalence: Based on the geographical incidence of different public goods, allocative efficiency requires the equalization of locational advantages arising from inter-jurisdictional differences with a combination of taxes and public goods and services. (c) The Principle of Centralized Stabilization: This requires the use of fiscal instruments for achieving macroeconomic objectives of growth, stabilization and full employment by residents of different geopolitical...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

... Background to the Study
Fiscalfederalism is essentially about multilevel government structure, rather than within a level structure of government, for the performance of government functions and service delivery to the people. Each level of government can be viewed as an institution with definite functions to perform (Rivlin, 1991). The conventional wisdom in economics is that all functions allocated to government should be those that the market is not able to perform in the efficient allocation of resources, equitable distribution of income, and economic stability and growth (Varian, 1990; Layard and Walters, 1978).
Fiscalfederalism in Nigeria dates back to 1954 when the country, which had until then been governed as a unitary state by the British, adopted a federal constitution. However, despite over fifty years of experience with fiscalfederalism, the country is still beset with the challenges of economic management, poor output growth rate, high inflation rate, and weak balance of payment position. The absence of good economic governance has also raised the problematic issue of credibility in public policy. Relevant question central to this thesis is could fiscalfederalism challenges be responsible for poor economic performance in Nigeria? Another question is: What are the current issues or...

...CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Federalism as it were, originated during the colonial epoch beginning with the amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorates in 1914. It was introduced into Nigeria precisely by the 1946 Richardson constitution. The constitution introduced regionalism into Nigeria for the first time, establishing regional assemblies in addition to the already existing central legislature. However, the regional houses remained only as deliberative and advisory bodies having no real legislative competence.' They also served as electoral colleges for the central legislature.
The Macpherson constitution of 1951 brought greater federalism to the country. It increased regional autonomy within a united Nigeria. It created larger and more representative regional legislatures with increased powers. It also created a concurrent list with 19 subjects on which both the regional and central legislatures' could legislate and in the event of conflict the regional law was to prevail. 'The Lyttleton constitution of 1954 further promoted federalism in the country. The constitution saw the full, romance of Nigeria with federalism, thus making Nigeria a full- fledged federation. This was imperative because of the 'Eight point programme passed in May, 1953 by the legislative council of northern region which would have brought about a virtual...

...ABSTRACT
India is the largest democracy with federal form of government. The fiscal arrangements in India have evolved in a quasi-federal system to meet the requirements of centralized planning in a mixed economy structure and their sources of revenue for both Centre and State were clearly demarcated with regard to the financial relationship and the responsibilities between them. Our constitution provides residual powers to the Centre and makes clear division of fiscal powers between the Centre and the State Governments. Through various source of revenue to government, the Constitution of India provides for the establishment of a Finance Commission for the purpose of allocation of certain resources of revenue between the Union and the State Governments. The Finance Commission is established under Article 280 of the Constitution of India by the President. The Article 264 and 293 explain the financial relations between the Union and the State Government. Although the states have been assigned certain taxes which are levied and collected by them, they also share in the revenue of certain union taxes and there are certain other taxes which are levied and collected by the Central Government but whole proceeds are transferred to the states. In India, the Centre-State financial relationship relates to the distribution of power in resource mobilization between the Centre and States as also the sharing of expenditure responsibilities. During the last...

...I have chosen to write about The Welfare Policy. I will focus this paper on the programs that provide assistance through food and cash benefits The welfare system is made of several different programs for sharing control of by the states and federal governments. The welfare system was created in 1935 by The Social Secutrity Act. The act created the federal governments part in the welfare policy which up until then had been left to the states. . Many people consider the welfare programs to be some of the major problems of the welfare policy. These programs get their funds from the federal and state governments. Pressure from the states for more authority over these programs has grown. Some think that if the states had more control over these programs that the states will create new welfare experiments that may find new ways to use their own resources to help the growing amount of low-income families. Others think that the states money problems will create cuts in benefits and services from welfare, as each state tries to keep from attracting new welfare claimants.
Social Security is a federal government program that gives cash benefits to retired and disabled citizens. These benefits are universal. Universal benefits are given to eligible claimants without them having to meet a certain income level. Social Security taxes are required to paid out of most employees and employers payrolls. How much benefits a person can receive depends on how much the...

...Macroeconomics of Minimum Wage
Draft: Do not quote
MACROECONOMIC EFFECTS OF MINIMUM WAGE IN NIGERIA: A GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS
Abiodun O. Folawewo*
Abstract This paper examines the macroeconomic effects of minimum wage (MW) policy in Nigeria using a static computable general equilibrium. Data for the study is drawn from year 2005 National Account of the country. The data is used to construct a 22 x 22 social accounting matrix (SAM) for the economy. The calibration exercise shows that the model’s parameters are able to replicate the baseline data with acceptable precision. Simulation results show that a rise in MW would lead to increased productivity in all economic sectors. The impact of MW increase on employment is mixed; while it leads to marginal rise of employment in agricultural sector, there is a marginal fall in services sector’s employment, and no significant effect in manufacturing and mining and oil sectors. In terms of price effect, an increase in MW would lead to a significant rise in general price level. A rise in MW has positive effects on household income and consumption, as well as on government balances. JEL Code: C680; E640; J380
Prepared for presentation at the CSEA Conference 2007: Economic Development in Africa, Oxford, 19 - 20 March 2007
* Abiodun O. Folawewo, PhD, Lecturer, Department of Economics, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica. Tel: +1 (876) 512-3011; Fax: +1 (876) 977-1483....

...﻿Located in West Africa and bordering the Atlantic, Nigeria is a big country that occupies 356,667 square miles with a total population of 168 million. Nigeria is abundant in natural resources like coal, gold, lead, iron, salt, copper, and zinc, but it is best known as a big producer of oil. Thanks to its size, population, and resources, Nigeria is dubbed as “the giant of Africa” (Falola, 4). According to World Bank Data of 2010, Nigeria has an annual percentage growth rate as 8.0%, one of the world’s highest rate. Yet, its poverty still remains high. The National Bureau of Statistics gave that 60.9% of Nigerians are living on less than a $1 dollar a day (BBC). The poverty problem that Nigeria is facing traces its origins back to the slave trade and colonialism, and evolves till today.
The most important origin in making Nigerian poverty history is slavery. Slave trade in Africa started when four hundred slaves were shipped out of the Niger Delta by the Portuguese in 1480 (Falola, 31). During the eighteenth century, sugar production, gold mining, and the production of staple crops blossomed in many parts of Americas; which escalated the demand for slavery (Mann, 31). As a result, more than 3.5 million slaves were shipped from Nigeria to America. (Schwab, 12). While slavery brought Europeans a huge amount of profits, Nigeria and the rest of African continent suffered a great...

...FiscalFederalism and National Unity Richard M. Bird and Robert D. Ebel
Abstract
An important characteristic of many countries is that they exhibit, to greater or lesser degrees, some “asymmetry” in the way in which different regions are treated by their intergovernmental fiscal systems. This paper explores some of the varied extents and manners in which such asymmetrical treatment may help or hinder the maintenance of an effective nation-state, where “effectiveness” encompasses both how effectively, efficiently, and (perhaps) equitably public services are provided throughout the national territory and also the effects asymmetry may have on the very existence of “fragmented” nation-states.
Key words: federalism, decentralization, asymmetry, subsidiarity JEL codes: H70, D74
1
FiscalFederalism and National Unity Richard M. Bird and Robert D. Ebel
Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Canada, People’s Republic of China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Philippines, Russia, Spain, Sudan, Switzerland—what can this diverse set of countries possibly have in common? One important answer is that each contains within its boundaries a significant territorially based group of people who are, or who consider themselves to be, distinct and different in ethnicity, in language, in religion, or just in history (ancient or recent) from the majority of the population. Indeed, contrary to the common...

...Federalism
What’s Important?
Focus on Power/Autonomy and Money
The Supremacy Clause
Article VI of the Constitution:
The Constitution and the laws of the U.S. are the “supreme law of the land”
Federalism—Key Questions
* 1. What does the “Supremacy Clause” really mean?
* 2. How much “power” does Congress (or the national government, generally) have, particularly to “regulate” interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8?
* What “power(s)” do states on their own still have?
* 3. Which “level” of government is best-suited to handle various issues? (That is, who should do what?)
* 4. Should there be “national” standards or rules in some areas? Which? Can this change?
* 5. Which level of government is going to be responsible for funding the ever-growing array of programs in response to demands by the people?
*
“Types” of Federalism
* “Cooperative” Federalism
* Modern roots in New Deal Programs;
* “Competitive” Federalism
* Can be both a battle for scarce resources (money, primarily), but also for power/responsibility
* “Coercive” Federalism
* Action dictated by national government (“mandates”)
McCulloch v. Maryland
(see text, pp. 101—102; p. 809)
* Expansion of implied powers doctrine, giving the national (federal) government more power; see Article I, Section 8 (last part)
* “Power to tax...