Legislative Wrap-up: Environmental Justice, Cap-and-Trade Funding

Actor LeVar Burton visited the State Assembly on its last day and was mobbed by Assemblymembers wanting pictures. Image: Screengrab from The California Channel

The lead-up to the end of the California legislative session at midnight last night included a standard amount of grandstanding, tearful farewells, laughter, and exhaustion. Some bills passed and will now await the governor’s good graces, and some died on the legislature floor. Here’s a quick recap of a few bills relevant to sustainable streets. Details on each follow:

S.B. 1387: Community representatives on South Coast Air Quality Management District Board

Environmental Justice in General Plans

Senator Connie Leyva’s bill that would require local planning to incorporate consideration of environmental justice, S.B. 1000, passed the Senate floor late in the evening, after being held up briefly in the Assembly by politics.

Leyva had angered legislative leaders earlier in the session when she endorsed an Assembly colleague’s opponent in the upcoming Senate race. For a while yesterday it looked like her bill, which has the potential to profoundly improve planning in California, could fall victim to repercussions of her stance.

But in the end it passed. A few Republicans, including Senator Jim Nielsen (R-Tehama) got up to complain that the bill would undercut local control, that it “broadened the opportunity for litigation,” and that having to incorporate “so-called environmental justice” into General Plans would be costly for cities. The final vote was 25 to 13 in favor.

This bill has the potential to profoundly improve planning in California for everyone. Not only would it require cities to think and talk about which of its communities are at a disadvantage because of past planning decisions, it would make them come up with ways to involve the people in those communities in making future planning decisions. While good public engagement is without a doubt a challenge to encourage and manage, it is also something city planners need to do anyway.

Justice on the South Coast Air District Board

Another environmental justice bill we wrote about yesterday did not fare so well. S.B. 1387 from Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon (D-Los Angeles) would have added local residents to the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board, thus giving them a voice in decisions made by that board. In the end, the bill failed in a vote on the Assembly floor, with Republicans voting against it and claiming that the bill was an attempt by the state to wrest away local control.

One legislative staffer believed that at least some of these legislators withheld their votes because they expect a change on the board soon, which would moot the point of the bill for them. Another concern with the bill was that adding three new members would mean the board would end up with an even number of votes, which could lead to problems if there were a tie.

You might not think cities would want to be disadvantaged, but it can be a huge advantage to be disadvantaged when it comes to applying for state funding.

Gomez’s bill steps around this controversy by calling for at least ten percent of the cap-and-trade funds to be invested in a way that benefits low-income communities anywhere in the state, whether they are officially considered “disadvantaged” under CalEnviroScreen or not.

“These communities have served as dumping grounds for industrial pollution. They are located next to highways, and are disproportionaly home to Latinos and African Americans,” said Gomez. “We can turn these red hot spots into green zones… This bill is an improvement over the status quo, and a framework for low-income communities that we can build on in the future.”

“The bill is not as good as it was when it left the Assembly,” said Ting, “but it is still good. We need to continue improving the definition” so that it incorporates low-income communities.

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Allocations

Gomez’s bill was attached to S.B. 1613, the budget bill that allocates the portion of cap-and-trade funding that is not already allocated by formula. That bill was negotiated in the last few days between Assembly and Senate leaders, and ended up passing on both floors yesterday.

In the end, the bill allocated the amount of money currently in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund thusly:

$10 million to the Active Transportation Program. This is the first time the Active Transporation Program has received any money from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, even though getting people to ride bikes and walk rather than drive cars is arguably the most cost-effective way to reduce greenhouse gases. $10 million is not as much as advocates had hoped for, but it’s a good start.

$135 M to the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital program (so, no money for transit operations, which are sorely needed)

$80 M to urban greening programs

$2 M for technical assistance in disadvantaged communities, to help them develop projects and programs to reduce GHGs

$140 M to a new Transformative Climate Communities program (see below)

$40 M to forestry and fire protection

$130 M to the Clean Vehicle Rebate Program

$80 M to the Enhanced Fleet Modernization Program and the Plus-Up Pilot project (which aim to make electric vehicles accessible to low-income drivers)

The Transformative Climate Communities program, created by A.B. 2722, also passed yesterday. This bill from Assemblymember Autumn Burke (D-Inglewood) calls for grants to be made “for the development and implementation of neighborhood-level transformative climate community plans that include greenhouse gas emissions reduction projects that provide local economic, environmental, and health benefits to disadvantaged communities.” Its promise is to tap into the creative energies of local communities, and it is one of the bills passed this session that have the potential to involve more people in solving the pressing problems of climate change, transportation, and maybe even housing.

Several bills that could make it easier to build more housing also passed in the last hours of the session—but this is enough for now. More on those later.

SB 1387 was seen as not really “environmental justice for communities” but a way for the State to help pack the AQMD board. Many local agencies and JPAs were opposed to it because it could lead to a precedence of the state changing boards in the future if they made the “wrong” decision (never mind that the state has the authority to do that anyway, since all local government is a creature of the state). Antonovich is stepping down due to term limits at the end of 2016 and so his seat from LA County would likely be replaced by a progressive.

Bert

“Environmental justice” is just a codeword for more NIMBY. The one thing communities don’t want in California is transit. This is true from Atherton to Compton (whose black leaders helped kill Measure J).

Individual communities are given far too many tools to say No. That is what will happen here: communities will be asked for input and say No to everything because of either “gentrification” or “urbanization” or so forth.

What the state should be doing is telling all the cities and communities to go to heck and build new transit corridors. Like CAHSR, the Wilshire Subway or Dumbarton Caltrain.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Today is the deadline to pass any policy bills that have a fiscal impact out of all California legislative committees, so the last two weeks have seen a flurry of long hearings. Here’s a quick recap of pertinent bills. BIKES Riding side-by-side is okay: Assemblymember Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) has a bill, A.B. 2509, that […]

As Friday’s deadline approaches for bills to either be passed from their legislative house of origin or die, the halls of the capitol in Sacramento are getting hectic. Here is some of what has transpired in relation to sustainable transportation issues: Representation on the California Transportation Commission: A.B. 179, a bill that would require one […]

Today is the deadline for California Governor Jerry Brown to sign or reject any bills passed by the legislature this session, so there has been a flurry of activity in the last few days. Here’s a quick look at few freshly signed laws pertinent to sustainable transportation and the climate. Transportation Safety We’ve written about […]

GREENHOUSE GAS TARGETS The Senate’s signature climate change bill, S.B. 32, cleared a hurdle this morning when it was approved by the Assembly on a vote of 42 to 29. The bill sets targets for California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions beyond 2020, when the current Global Warming Solutions Act will expire. S.B. 32 […]

The Transportation Equity Summit, hosted by TransForm and the California Bicycle Coalition, will offer conversations on transportation justice topics, including funding and public participation. And there will be awards.