Nike Metcon DSX Repper Shoe Review

It took a little bit, but the Nike Metcon DSX Reppers were finally launched sometime in mid February. Still, Nike’s product description about them left much to the imagination, not really giving you any kind of clue as to what they’re meant for. Based off of looks alone, they resemble a cross between the Metcon 2 and the DSX Flyknit; but they’re the lowest priced Metcon yet, retailing for a mere $100. Compared to the more expensive Metcon’s, the omission of the drop-in midsole sounded alarming, but at the end of the day doesn’t make much of a difference. Which begs the question of even having the need for the drop-in midsole in the first place.

Looks/Construction:

The best way to describe the DSX Reppers looks is to say that they’re a hodgepodge of all the Metcon’s before them. There’s a little bit of Metcon 1/2 and DSX Flyknit, with little to no design cues at all from the Metcon 3. The upper material is a knit material that’s not as elastic as Flyknit, but it’s beefier than the mesh on the Metcon 1’s and 2’s. On top of that are TPU overlays that seem more decorative than functional, and around the toe box gets beefier almost like a toe cap. Premium features like Flywire lacing are still present in the Reppers and if you opt for a college colorway, get premium laces to match; otherwise you’ll get the same flimsy style laces currently found on the Metcon and DSX Flyknit.

Though the outsole has no mention of “Sticky-Rubber”, the compound feels the same as it does on the more expensive models and in my experience, grips the same as well. Undoubtedly, the biggest difference between the Reppers and the more expensive models is the omission of the drop-in midsole. Instead you get a more standard Phylon midsole, densely compressed EVA foam, which is also found on other Nike running and lifestyle shoes. Obviously, the Reppers include a more standard Ortholite insole that is removable.

Though these might be budget priced, they don’t feel like budget shoes. The materials used rival any of the more expensive Metcon’s and matches the quality you’d come to expect from a Nike product. Personally, I actually think in some ways these feel more sturdy than the other Metcon’s. The woven mesh upper really feels like it could take a beating and since there is no drop-in midsole, there are no squeaking noises!

Fit:

Typically, Metcon’s fit my feet the best out of any shoes out there. The overall shape of the Reppers is the same, but I feel like they run closer in size to the DSX Flyknits, being a tad on the small side. A 9.5 Repper fit me a little bit on the tight side, as did the DSX Flyknits. I could use it and it wasn’t terrible, but I sized up to a 10 and now they’re much more comfortable, especially for running. If you’re in between sizes, go for the half size up from where you were.

Here are my sizes:

Metcon 3 – 9.5

DSX Flyknit – 9.5 but it’s tight, I would get a 10 next time.

Nano 6/7 – 10

Romaleos 3 – 9.5

CrazyPower – 9.5

Ultraboost – 9.5

NMD – 10

Performance:

So what exactly are the DSX Repper’s good for? Everything! I know that’s a little vague and all, but they really are the answer for everything you’d come across in a WOD. Where the Metcon 3’s come short in the flexibility/comfort department, the Reppers are awesome. While the DSX Flyknits fall short in stability, the Reppers shine. It really is hard to believe that these are the “budget” models!

I was worried that since Nike cut the drop-in midsole out of the Reppers, they would be inferior for lifting. No, they’re not as stable as the Metcon 3’s for Olympic Weightlifting, mainly due to the much more flexible forefoot, but the Phylon midsole is extremely dense and does not have much give, if any at all. Responsiveness and power delivery is spot on; you’d feel like you’re lifting in any other Metcon unless you put them on back to back. For me, the DSX Flyknit midsole compressed a little more than I’d like, which ended up causing my feet to ache after repeated bounding. In the Reppers, the Phylon midsole creates a nice stable base that isn’t too soft or too hard.

Laterally, the stability of the Reppers is excellent and the foot bed cradles your foot without much roll over. Forward stability is where the Reppers struggle at a little bit, once again mainly due to the flexibility of the forefoot. Dynamic lifts are what I think the Metcon 3’s are better for, but the Reppers easily match up with the Flyknit’s, and in my opinion are better because of the slightly more flat and stable platform. For static lifts, the Reppers are excellent, there isn’t a ton of midsole compression like there is with the Flyknits, so they match up more closely to the Metcon 3; though I’d still rule in favor of the standard model.

Where the Reppers really shine, is the fact that they’re an all around metcon shoe. The forefoot flex grooves really do an amazing job providing flex at to toe for running and bounding exercises. Never have I felt like my feet were straining after multiple wall balls, double-unders or runs. The drop is 6mm like the Flyknits, but compared to the 4mm drop in the Metcon 3’s, you really won’t notice a huge difference. The overall platform is still minimalist and the outsole shape is virtually identical to what you’d find on the original Metcon shoes. Dare I say that these might be the overall best WOD Metcon?!

Value/Conclusion:

Like I said, it’s hard to believe that these are “budget” shoes; even performing better in some ways than the standard Metcons, yet only retailing for $100! Other than the Conviction-X, the DSX Reppers might be the most surprising shoe of the year. I feel just like with any other Metcon, you don’t have to worry about what you’re doing when you have them on. The DSX Reppers go to show that you don’t need all these new technologies to have an excellent performing training shoe. They’re a no frills, training shoe that successfully captures exactly what makes Metcons so good, but tweaks the formula making them a great all around shoe. These are what the DSX Flyknits should have been.

As of right now, I think these are my favorite Metcon’s right now because I can do ANYTHING in them and not have to worry. If it came down to having to compete or serious lifting, I would choose the standard Metcon 3’s, but day to day training, the Reppers are easier to live in. These are the best deal in training shoes.

Post navigation

15 comments

Great review. The pair I had last week looked to be well made shoe. Sadly, they were WAY to small. I wear a 11.5 in metcons and these in 11.5 were far too small for me. I returned them but if they get some new cool colors, I will go back and try the 12. They did feel like a solid shoe.

Hi Joe, Ethan here again. You suggested the AB Cerakote Training bar to me, which is on order (linked from this site)! Thanks! What all around shoe do you suggest for someone new to weight training that has very wide feet? I have my old pair of Asics Kayano 19, but heard flat shoes are better for the big 3 lifts. Thanks again! Ethan.

Hi Joel – Awesome review again. I’m no crossfit athlete, but I do a lot of circuit training, compound lifts, agility, cardio workouts, HITT, etc. These shoes are by far the best all around shoe I’ve had the pleasure of using. I thought I would never find a replacement for my old reliable Nike Free 5.0 V6 Trainers. I tried the Metcons, but were too stiff for my liking being that I’m not using my shoes for crossfit specific training workouts. Like you mentioned, my only gripe with this shoe are the laces. Please let us all know if you find a decent pair of replacement laces at some point. I’ll be searching for some no doubt. As always, I appreciate all of your reviews and objective/unbiased reviews. I wish you all the best!

Hi!
Thanks for the review of the shoe – for some reason this particular model does not have any “online presence”, so it is nearly impossible to find any info on them.

One question I have is the heel slippage – the issue that was/is present in the Metcon series. It took a while for me to get used to the way that Metcon 2s slid from my heel, and the only way to resolve the issue was to purchase a sticky insert that would make the heel fit better.

So, does this Repper model have the same issue? How would you rate the stability of the heel when wearing these shoes, especially during movements that require your foot to be bent.

So this may be a dumb question, but what is the normal life of these shoes? This will be my first pair of crossfit training shoes, so I was just wondering how long I can expect them to last? My normal routine is about 4-5 exercise days a week. Also, thank you for all your reviews, they really do go a long way in helping sort through all the products out there. Thanks!

There’s no such thing as a dumb question my friend! It really depends on how often you wear them but CF shoes are super durable. You can expect at least a year out of them. I still have some of my first Metcons!

It is about time to replace my Speed TR’s and I have been looking at these shoes for a while. However, I am also anxiously awaiting the release of the Speed TR 2.0. If you had to choose between the Speed TR and the Metcon Repper for an everyday WOD shoe, which would you choose?

This was a great review- sounds like this the shoe that I need. But there is one issue, they are available only online in India, hence I can’t try it before purchase. I have tried out the Nike Free train V6 in the stores and they were a perfect fit. I plan to use the shoes for early morning runs and gym training. I plan to spend more time at the gym in the initial weeks and then gradually transition to running and calisthenics. Please help me choose which shoe is better suited for my needs.