-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 18:59:13 Bruce Aune wrote:
> I think Roger will have to focus his criticism more directly on the
> argument I offered.
[proof of contingency, detail omitted]
> I can't see anything objectionable with this argument.
But look back at my message!
I did not dispute the argument that the proposition is contingent.
I disputed the claim that it is a priori.
Roger
- --
rbjones.com PGP public key at: rbjones.com/rbj.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrnYxQACgkQpS+qcQX1oA9p0QCcDzCe1tg/f6olv25a8eCrbP0J
ry0AniNoI1Oe5Lu4KLduXyVy2TMi8+Gq
=jWG8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----