Unless you don't have an opinion at all on vaccines, you likely fall into one of the five phases of awareness and awakening. Most of the population at some point has been exposed to one of these modes of thought regarding vaccination programs. Some people will remain at one phase their entire lives while others have quickly progressed as more research has come forth. Regardless of your opinion, please take our poll here which will help us assess the position of our audience.

"The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination"
-- Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital

* PLEASE NOTE THAT MULTIPLE ANSWERS FROM THE SAME IP ADDRESS WILL BE TRACKED AND DELETED.

JavaScript needs to be enabled for polling to work.

There are now millions of educated and informed groups of people that will stop at nothing to expose the dangers of vaccinations. Their numbers are growing by the day. Then there is the polar opposite side branching from mainstream medical opinions and misinformation that still believe that routine vaccinations benefit populations due to myths such as "herd immunity" and other nonsensical arguments. Finally, there is a very large intermediary group that also number in the millions, who sit on the fence and are indifferent or undecided about where vaccines stand in terms of advancing health. Many of the fence sitters are made up of those who understand that current vaccination practices are unsafe, yet somehow also believe you can make vaccines safer or more effective.

Thinking we can "green" vaccines, as Jim Carrey and Jenny McCarthy have subscribed to is as ridiculous as an approach to green cigarettes. Proposing to make vaccines more safe, affordable, necessary and effective as is the mission statement of Sane Vax Inc, is preposterous and frankly a betrayal of the anti-vaccine advocates they claim to be representing (or should I say misrepresenting).

Negotiating poison is illogical and senseless. We don't approach poison control agencies and ask them to better regulate limits on the safe consumption of poisons. Whether you drink an ounce or a gallon, you're still ingesting poison. All vaccines, every last one of them contain toxic substances that are poisonous to the human body.

Vaccine advocates love to resort to their favorite justification, the Holy Grail of the vaccine proponents -- herd immunity. This concept is based upon the idea that 95% (and some now say 100%) of the population must be vaccinated to prevent an epidemic. Herd immunity is mostly a myth and applies only to natural immunity -- that is, contracting the infection itself.

In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the population at large occurred only if people contracted the infections naturally. The reason for this is that naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one major problem -- vaccine-induced immunity lasted for only a relatively short period, from 2 to 10 years at most, and then this applies only to humoral immunity. This is why they began, silently, to suggest boosters for most vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella.

Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were lasting for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those which they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.

That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.

THE MYTH OF HISTORICAL VACCINE EFFECTIVENESS IN PREVENTING DISEASE

Over a century of myths have allowed drugs and vaccines to transcend logic in health care and persuade the masses in disease care. These beliefs have allowed a complacency in opinion to outweigh any critical thinking that opposes these myths, and consequently any discomfort in the process.

The main argument most people unfamiliar with vaccine dangers proclaim is their historical effectiveness. The problem is that there has been so much misinformation throughout the decades that people have a hard time distinguishing facts from fiction. Only now are the facts coming forward on what really happened 50, 100 and even 200 years ago and why some diseases were controlled (none were eradicated).

The reason we no longer have the frequency of some of the terrible diseases that happened in the last several centuries is due to improved living conditions, sanitation and nutrition. Once again this comes down to separating the propaganda by mainstream medicine from reality. Vaccines have never prevented and will never prevent disease...only act as a vehicle to propagate disease.

A summary review of data on neurological adverse events and the historical role of vaccination in the natural course of infectious disease in Switzerland and Germany, supports data from other regions with evidence that vaccines had no impact on disease prevention efforts from the early-mid to late 20th century.

Historically, vaccines have not been viewed as inherently toxic by the regulatory agencies. The resulting lack of evidence of causality between vaccinations and serious adverse outcomes has thus been filled with an assumption that vaccines are safe.

This report prepared by Raymond Obomsawin, Ph.D, Senior Advisor - First Nations Centre National Aboriginal Health Organization, graphically illlustrates how major declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed.

Here are some other very valuable peer-reviewed
scientific publications that clearly demonstrate the dangers of vaccination: