Very weird responses, mostly. I feel like the time I'd spend on long replies can be spent in a better way, which is what I'll do. Guess I have a different view on this.

No weirder than the slant everyone is throwing on their side. I like these debates because no one explains their position, they preach weird scenarios that make them right.

Right now, I think everyone has a good point while ignoring the other side. Maybe it has to do with working with people in this situation and noticing the WEIRD hypocrisy, that really isn't hypocritical, that happens.

His heart was visible, and the dismal sack that maketh excrement of what is eaten.

Join Date

Mar 2006

Posts

7,345

Posted On:12/07/2012 4:01pm

3

Originally Posted by AKRhino

Interesting responses to this thread. I myself, cannot imagine, were I in the position of having a child of similar abilities, NOT allowing my kid to do this, if it's something he wanted to try. You all telling me if you had a kid with those abilities asking to try, and telling you he wants to try wrestling, and you'd look him in the eyes and say "sorry, you can't do that, you're not able to do that." Do you punish your able bodied children if they don't win the little league game too? At the age of 12 some schools don't even let sports teams win or lose (which is admittedly ridiculous).

It doesn't seem set up to me as a Hallmark moment. The Dad said in the article his son just wants to do what other kids are doing, so they got him involved, and recorded his match, like any parent would record of photo their kids, then he put on FB and it took off from there (this is the internet, that's how these things work). I have to imagine I'd encourage this kind of thing myself, especially something with a team atmosphere as I can only imagine the kid doesn't often get opportunities to experience something like that.

The kid didn't get to "try" wrestling. He was carried out onto a mat in front of a bunch of people and another boy pretended he lost a match to a grappling dummy. If he tried wrestling he'd get murdered. He can't be a wrestler, ever. Period. As some have pointed out, it would be much more reasonable to expose him to the sport in a private setting if he was really interested.

Parents of disabled or able bodied kids should encourage them without putting them into impossible situations or making a mockery of them. Abandoning reality in an effort to satisfy your child or make yourself feel better is not good parenting.

Yeah, which is why I've decided that instead of getting really emotional over something I actually care about I'll just move on. So yeah.

LOL@YOU. Yes, I see hypocrisy at times, not my fault you have blinders on. There are many things "I actually care about" that contain a form of weird hypocrisy.

Show me where someone said he shouldn't wrestle, he should be confined to his lot in life and that HE WAS AN ASSHOLE for trying. I see a bunch of **** given to the adults for creating a spectacle. I don't fully agree, but I can see and understand that argument.

What I saw was people QUESTION the motivation, say the wouldn't let THEIR kid lose and not allow their kid to participate in this type of match. That is completely different than using the Special Olympics, where EVERYONE would be bitching if Usain Bolt entered, as a crutch to compare two different situations.

If the kid wanted to do this then fine, he's been dealt a crappy hand and it makes others feel good about helping him. 13 year olds are well aware when they're being patronized and put on display though, and they hate it. In his place, I'd feel closer to Devil's opinion: that this is not a wrestling match and I'm being made into a charity display. But that's just me and if this kid got something out of it, great for everyone.

LOL@YOU. Yes, I see hypocrisy at times, not my fault you have blinders on. There are many things "I actually care about" that contain a form of weird hypocrisy.

Show me where someone said he shouldn't wrestle, he should be confined to his lot in life and that HE WAS AN ASSHOLE for trying. I see a bunch of **** given to the adults for creating a spectacle. I don't fully agree, but I can see and understand that argument.

What I saw was people QUESTION the motivation, say the wouldn't let THEIR kid lose and not allow their kid to participate in this type of match. That is completely different than using the Special Olympics, where EVERYONE would be bitching if Usain Bolt entered, as a crutch to compare two different situations.

Alright, since I wasn't clear before, let me just say this: I understand what everyone is saying and where they're coming from. Yes, my "weird replies" comment was a little... pointless.

Right now, I just believe that making a big argument out of this won't do much. I disagree with some people on this and vice versa. That's alright. I don't think there's much to be argued. Different views on this. Fine with me.

I might feel like explaining myself a little better tomorrow sans whiskey. Don't count on it, though (because I'm sure many people will care).

My $.02 comes from Kurt, a tough Okie LEO (last job was children's sex slavery Judge's task force for Northern CO) rancher / camp director. He used his high country spread for handicapped kids for decades, until insurance and labor got too much. We use his place for http://mountainfriendscamp.org/. Kurt talked to me one night about getting hadicapped kids on horses, canoes, river rafting, and even water skiing. He said the payoff was seeing the kid's lives change from one good experience and knowing that he'd made a big difference. Who cares if it's not "real" water skiing and that the kid is propped up on a sled?

"Preparing mentally, the most important thing is, if you aren't doing it for the love of it, then don't do it." - Benny Urquidez

Hasn't he gotten enough of a raw deal in life? Y'all want to take away some exibition fun and a great opportunity for the other kid to show some real heart?

Yeah, I said it. The boy who rolled with him just showed a great deal of compassion and sportsmanship. He knew it wasn't a "competition". He saw it for what it was. A brief chance for the CP kid to experience normality. Just for a couple of seconds. The kid can't wrestle. He'll never get to be a wrestler. This short exibition roll was a way to include him in something that nature litteraly cheated him out of.

Y'all are some messed up, social darwinist Nazis if you really think this shouldn't have happened. It was big karma points for the healthy boy and a unique positive experience for the crippled boy.

Hasn't he gotten enough of a raw deal in life? Y'all want to take away some exibition fun and a great opportunity for the other kid to show some real heart?

Yeah, I said it. The boy who rolled with him just showed a great deal of compassion and sportsmanship. He knew it wasn't a "competition". He saw it for what it was. A brief chance for the CP kid to experience normality. Just for a couple of seconds. The kid can't wrestle. He'll never get to be a wrestler. This short exibition roll was a way to include him in something that nature litteraly cheated him out of.

Y'all are some messed up, social darwinist Nazis if you really think this shouldn't have happened. It was big karma points for the healthy boy and a unique positive experience for the crippled boy.

That's all that needs to be taken away from this.

What I am taking away from this is a few of you broke your bifocals and can't read from up on that soapbox.

Again where did anyone say HE SHOULD NOT PARTICIPATE? I see two people attacking the motivation of the match and one person saying "not my child..."