Neighbors near Kosciuszko Park in Wilmington expressed anger and
outrage Friday, after learning the details of a brutal gang-rape that
happened in the park Thursday. Police say two women, ages 32 and 24, were reportedly attacked and
sexually assaulted by a group of 10 to 12 black male juveniles in
Kosciuszko Park at about 6:54 p.m. Thursday. According to police, the
suspects, who range in age from 12 to 17-years-old, remain on the loose.

What a pity that the sexual reality so seldom lives up to the dream. I'm sure it was a little disappointing that instead of being tenderly ravished by Hollywood-designated female fantasy objects Denzel Washington, Isaac Washington, and Blair Underwood, they got stuck, so to speak, by precocious preteens and larval gangstas instead.

It's amusing to think of Phoenician now desperately searching all over the Internet for a reports of a pack of white juveniles raping black women in order to cry raciss. Especially in light of how the FBI has reported ZERO white rapes of black women in recent years.

John Derbyshire was right. If women of any race don't wish to be gang-raped by people who are not even a little bit savage and it would totally be raciss to consider their behavior anything less than one hundred percent civilized, they are advised to avoid being caught alone, unarmed, or in insufficient numbers, in excessively vibrant circumstances.

UPDATE: I am vastly amused by the reaction of this pair of white boy gammas:

David Gorski ‏@gorskon
Misogyny and blatant racism from @voxday, all mixed up into an offensive, toxic ball. Ugh.

Michael Ward ‏@badsciencemonk
That is one of the most disgusting diatribes I have ever read

You can practically see the wheels spinning in their little politically correct heads. If I express sufficient public outrage about sexiss and raciss, maybe a shoggoth will let me approach the stankity grail! The best part is the way the idea that someone might speak freely about the observable societal blessings of vibrancy genuinely upsets them more than literal gang-rape by children.

Also, I would like to point out that as a bona fide Person of Color, by definition, I cannot be racist because minority, and it is racist of these two white men to offend me by attempting to falsely label me as such. That's right, boys, I see your Raciss card and I trump with my Color card and my own Raciss card. Now go say three I Have a Dreams and watch The Color Purple by way of penance.

“Who told you that it was ok to mistreat women to this magnitude? And what do you need from society so that you can make better choices,” said Wilmington Councilwoman Sherry Dorsey-Walker, whose district includes the park.

are you SURE these victims were white? every single person interviewed in the video is obviously black. there are some whites in the wide angle shots but it's clear that this actually is a neighborhood of vibrancy.

only thing that really surprises me is that this happened in full daylight.

No, and it's entirely possible they were, in fact, Esquimaux, but I suspect the coverage would not be of this magnitude if they were black. As a general rule, black-on-black crime does not inspire much in the way of general outrage.

I'm not getting anything from the article identifying either race of the victims or interracial rape fantasies, have I missed something or are you just going by statistics?

In Sweden-is-self-destructing-news:

* Vibrant that participated in the worst gangrape in the country's history, but wasn't convicted of rape, received roughly $15k in damages for the monhts he spent in jail awaiting trial. The victim of the 7-hour gangrape was deemed to deserve about 4 times that amount.

The article gets part of the story wrong. The man would have received damages even if he had been convicted of sexual assault, since his jail time was longer than any potential prison sentence, and the damages are calculated based on time spent in jail not negated by a prison sentence.

Unmentioned is that the victim now resides with a well known arab criminal that claims he will protect her from further assault.

Vox..."...they are advised to avoid being caught alone, unarmed, or in insufficient numbers, in excessively vibrant circumstances."

My guess is, these two rape victims knew each other and went to the park together, confident that since they were not ALONE, they would be safe.

If two women are not safe, neither are three, and if three are not safe together, neither are four. At what point are there enough white women together that they are safe from "unwelcome sexual advances"? Answer...there is no such point.

This is also the false security people feel when they get completely away from Negroes. The Aussie ball player had no reason to be anxious about jogging in Duncan, Oklahoma. The town is over 90 percent white and only one percent black. Why would he think there was any danger of being shot in the back unaware by three black punks during a driveby?

White flight does not save you and it does not make you safe. There is no safe ratio of black men (and boys) and white women (and girls).

This is also the false security people feel when they get completely away from Negroes. The Aussie ball player had no reason to be anxious about jogging in Duncan, Oklahoma. The town is over 90 percent white and only one percent black. Why would he think there was any danger of being shot in the back unaware by three black punks during a driveby?

Well, to a certain extent, there is some wisdom behind the notion of having a plan to kill everyone you meet. But we're talking about probabilities here. I prefer the odds of the next Aussie pitcher to go jogging in Duncan, Oklahoma than Chicago, Illinois.

VD August 31, 2013 10:06 AMAs a general rule, black-on-black crime does not inspire much in the way of general outrage.

normally i would agree, BUT 1 - you have highly placed, upper middle class, political blacks complaining about crime WITHIN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD2 - only local news coverage ( Philly is ~30 mi from Wilmington )https://www.google.com/search?q=Kosciuszko+Park+rape&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

it's not particularly unusual for local news to cover egregious vibrant acts. it's the jump to *national status* that is usually inhibited by both sides of the equation being vibrant.

i saw local stories in the WashPo when i was working in NorVa that dealt with black on black issues. and even though WashPo is technically a national newspaper, none of those local crime stories ever went 'national' into the other media outlets.

i would agree that groups of porch monkeys gone wilding usually indicates non-black victims ... but then, blacks are the primary victimizers of blacks anyways so it wouldn't really be that much of a statistical outlier for this to have been intra-culture.

While I can certainly believe youths of color are ready, willing and able to perpetrate this sort of crime in America at any time, I'm just a wee bit skeptical about this report.

2 days later and still no arrests? I've checked the updated stories and nothing. The rounding up of the usual suspects in these sort of outrage stories usually takes hours not days.

We're not dealing with criminal masterminds here. If this did happen, the common M.O. of negro yutes is to squawk to friends, send out pics, post video, Twitter and Facebook before the tips of their peckers are even dry leading police to their flop house in about 3 hours.

Vox...."Well, to a certain extent, there is some wisdom behind the notion of having a plan to kill everyone you meet. But we're talking about probabilities here. I prefer the odds of the next Aussie pitcher to go jogging in Duncan, Oklahoma than Chicago, Illinois."

I certainly understand your point. I would have bet the Aussie jogger was safe too and I would have lost my money. I did notice, since you mention Chicago, that the news from there is gangs of your vibrant youth doing mob attacks on whites ridding bicycles. Is nothing sacred?

Of course it is terrible when progressive environmentalists and Liberals get robbed and gangfucked (by their favorite ethnics) while fighting global warming or saving the baby seals.

I'll save Phony the trouble:"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man." [Source FBI]See!? SEE?! Creepy-azz-crakas do it too!

Of course, not that anything terrible has happened yet, except for the thinking about producing the movie. Maybe it will be as successful as Mat Damon's anti-Fracking movie that had financing from a group with a vested interest in oil.

"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man." [Source FBI]

It references DoJ statistics not FBI stats. Unfortunately, the DoJ data it links to seems to have moved or been removed.

Of course, any quibbling about the numbers of white on black rapes being statistically unreliable misses the point. There are more whites in the US than blacks by a large factor, and it is unlikely that black victims would fail to remember the race of their attackers.

Yeah, Table 42. There is a lot evidence that racists don't understand table 42-- or statistics in general--but not so much that there have been zero (or near zero) white on black rapes.

If we read table 42 the same way you guys do, then it "proves" that 40% of attempted property thefts against blacks that result in injury are committed by whites. It also "proves" that zero whites attempted to take property from blacks without injuring them.

Forcible rape was not even close to making this list: there were only 5,708 arrests.

Second, white men are a far bigger threat. The police still arrest twice as many white men for rape.

Going by the stereotypes, you would expect whiter countries to be safer. Despite the millions of black men in America, women are way safer there than in Canada and Australia, where rape is more than twice as common.

So where are the statistics that show black men are such dangerous rapists? It comes from comparing not all rapes but just interracial rapes. The FBI does not break out numbers for interracial rape but the Justice Department does for “rape and sexual assault”, based on a crime victim survey it does every year. But interracial rape is rare in that it has fewer than ten cases in its sample.

Moreover, on television rape is a dark-alley crime, but in fact strangers commit only 2% of rapes. Half are done by current or former boyfriends, dates and husbands.

cherub's revenge..."I'm just a wee bit skeptical about this report.2 days later and still no arrests? I've checked the updated stories and nothing. The rounding up of the usual suspects in these sort of outrage stories usually takes hours not days."

This was in Delaware, which is more like Maryland, not Alabama or Texas. Since the perps are all thought to be underage, the cops are not going to bother. But the fat, white social workers will definitely make inquiries. They will probably have to stay after school if this continues.

(It took another three weeks for them to track down the Beltway Snipers, a month after the killings began. The actually shooter was 17, deliberately to protect the "leader" from the death penalty. That part did not work well.)

racist motivated false rape accusation by black women against white men MAY, according to these numbers ( sample size <10 from the DOJ report ), occur more often than white men actually raping black women.

according to the raw numbers, White men OUGHT to be committing SIX times as many rapes as Black men ... cause, ya know, there's ~six times as many White men. and Hispanics ( i'm considering the Other column as a proxy for Hispanic ) should be in a dead heat with the Blacks ... which, actually, they seem to be in many cases ( violent threats and sex assaults against Whites, etc ).

White men SHOULD be committing 70-80% of all violent crime in the country due our much higher percentage of the population. i would hereby like to apologize for letting down the side.

now, consider that at any given time ~4.8% of Black men ( well more than double the White rate ) are in jail and have severely restricted access to rape opportunities ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_States

i must confess, Porch Monkey, you've made a convincing case.

Boris August 31, 2013 12:11 PMIt also "proves" that zero whites attempted to take property from blacks without injuring them.

jeezus, talk about NOT being able to read tables. you might want to read that note down by the asterisk again.

the only thing the table 'proves' is that Whites, statistically speaking, don't ( verifiably, see that Unknown column ) commit crimes against Blacks. of the 13 sub-categories in the violent offences, Whites failed to commit ten crimes against Blacks NATION WIDE in 10 of those categories.

Boris August 31, 2013 1:40 PMTen or fewer from the survey, not ten or fewer nationwide. You guys realize this was a SURVEY, right?

okay, you got me there.

guess i'll just have to stick with the "0% in ten out of thirteen categories."

unless you'd like to claim that the statistics are invalid?

The other skeptic August 31, 2013 1:34 PMSo, in 2006, compared to 2005 white victims of rape went up and black victims went down? Also, black rapist numbers went down?

no, the numbers shifted into the Unknown column. White offense rate variance is probably statistical noise, verified Black offense rate was halved but Unknown went through the roof, from 2.3% to 17.2%.

i would be highly leery of these surveys though, DOJ is extrapolating some pretty big damn numbers off of '10 or fewer sample cases'. Completed Robberies / with injury / Black on Black is 13,290 ... with an asterisk beside the 13,290 and 'without injury' is even bigger at 31,230 ... with an asterisk.

so ya, i guess the statistics might be invalid.

count on the .gov to waste time and resources compiling numbers that don't mean a damn thing.

"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.What this means is that every day in the United States......white rapists commit racist discrimination against black women, by choosing to rape white women instead. Under the Equal Penetration clause of the 14th Amendment, this country needs to apply Affirmative Assault and Equal Exploitation Opportunity laws to its rapists, to ensure minority women receive their fair share of rapings. This program, Section 8.3^2, falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Sodomy, and should be implemented immediately, if we want to end the charade that this is a fair and just country.

And since it was my idea, I am of course exempted from service. Sorry, suckers.

Vox, Vox, Vox...don't you know, as all right-thinking people do, that white, male heteropatriarchial sf / fantasy fiction is a far worse crime against humanity than the Nazi Holocaust or the Khmer Rouge's Killing Fields could ever be?

In the way of a woefully incomplete restitution for the fiction / thought crimes of my sex, please let me submit this revision of a dead white male's literary output/crime, by enhancing it a dose of womyn's fantasy:

SAM: Mr. Frodo, was that our Mr. Gandalf I saw leaving the King's wedding feast with a common doxy?

FRODO: Samwise Gamgee! I'm surprised at you, describing that sex-worker with the term "common." It just shows how Hobbit society has burdened you, a member of the working class, with a false consciousness that ends up reinforcing the very hierarchial structure that oppresses you!

SAM: Beg your pardon, Mr. Frodo. But if Mr. Gandalf, as a great and grand wizard, and therefore a member of the white male power structure, pays that whor...err, sex worker, to sleep with him, isn't the horny old goat taking advantage of the power imbalance between the two of them, and thus committing an 'orrible rape?

FRODO: Well, Sam, there's still a lot of disagreement among feminist scholars about the position of sex workers, so we'll just have to wait and see. In any event, your use of the term "horny old goat" suggests an inappropriate disregard for the sexual needs of the elderly, which I must remind you are just valid as anyone else's.

SAM: Beg your pardon again, Mr. Frodo....

FRODO: In any event, we cannot know whether Gandalf has committed rape until several days hence, when the young woman will determine, post hoc, whether or not she was sober enough after the wedding feast to even give consent to sex.

In the case of white male or black male rape, averages are for suckers. Raw numbers tell the story. White males are more likely to rape than black males.

I suspect that's one reason there are so few white male sex crimes against black women--lack of social contact.

The second reason is probably that white men don't often burglarize or commit robberies in black areas. Therefore, they're unlikely to either stumble upon black female potential victims, or to identify such victims while "casing" a place.

Now, while it is true that women fantasize about being raped, one has to carefully look at how and why. Rape fantasies can be either erotic (I'm being forced and I enjoy it) or aversive (I'm being forced and I hate it). In the majority of cases, women specifically have someone in mind to ravage them--their boyfriend, a cute guy in the bar, etc. Complete strangers? Rare.

Ah Delaware. From Newark and up its basically South Philly, and below the canal its rural Pennsylvania. I'm not surprised this happened, only that it got reported. Wilmington has been on fire for years now, as have certain parts of Dover but its been ignored in favor of reporting on fire department bbqs. WPD used to be hard and put down viciously any overt displays of vibrancy that wandered out of 'da bucket' but in the last two decades its been more concerned about making sure Old Black Ladies and nigger pastors are appeased.

@VD I cannot be racist because minority,. Do you number Ebonics among your polyglotdom?

If women of any race don't wish to be gang-raped by people who are not even a little bit savage and it would totally be raciss to consider their behavior anything less than one hundred percent civilized,

Hypergamic rape fantasies?

The only solution is to find a bunch of 100% civilized men willing to do their part in a sexual tourism kinda thing. With baroque or classical music in the background, reading and quoting Shakespeare while waiting their turn, and expressing their desires with perfect elocution and grammar of the queen's English, ... well you get the idea. "I shall copulate with you until you are fully lobotomized, madam" instead of "I'm going to fuck your brains out, bitch".

VD wrote: **If women of any race don't wish to be gang-raped by people who are not even a little bit savage and it would totally be raciss to consider their behavior anything less than one hundred percent civilized, they are advised to avoid being caught alone, unarmed, or in insufficient numbers, in excessively vibrant circumstances.**

What a brilliant idea! Unfortunately everything you suggest is impossible for any woman under 18 going to a public school, if she is not popular enough. Unless you know of any public schools that allow underage students to engage in concealed carry.

Vox: How does the ongoing Indian rape epidemic fit into your civilization-calming racial theory?

Blacks rape at a high clip: high-testosterone/masculinity, highly matriarchial, no impact of civilization on genetic legacy. Indians rape at a high clip: low testosterone/masculinity, fully patriarchal, greatest impact of civilization on genetic legacy.

Indians are Hindu and Muslim, but American Blacks are highly Christian.

The commonalities left between the groups are darker skin color (linked to sexual traits by James Watson), lower IQ's (85ish, in India's subcontinent), and lower sociosexual status/access (lower-class Black, Indian abortion-affected gender ratio and low-N female population).

Doesn't the Dumb, Horny, and Frustrated theory work better than the Uncivilized one?

Ann Morgan August 31, 2013 7:54 PMBrilliant. Except neither is feasible for the girl herself to do, if her parents don't agree.

do you really think that you're going to find anyone here who is going to argue that your parents were not at least neglectful if not outright abusive?

Ann Morgan August 31, 2013 7:52 PMUnless you know of any public schools that allow underage students to engage in concealed carry.

you're a girl.

you could have probably gotten away with that ... as in, put extra holes in an assailant or two, gone through a trial and then either gotten off with no prison time or minimal and some psych counseling and probation.

Porch Monkey wrote: **Normalizing percentages, averages...regardless of the manipulation of statistics, raw numbers do not lie...more white men rape than black men.**

There are more murders in the entire country of Canada every year, than in a single block of a Detroit ghetto. That doesn't prove that Canada is a more dangerous place to live than the Detroit ghetto. Come back when you've had 10 years of an intensive remedial math course. Moron.

Dumb Boris says:It bears repeating that totals rapes are down in recent years, as American society has become more "vibrant." It's not looking good for the hypothesis that "vibrancy" is destroying American society.

You forgot about all those blacks in prison, didn't you.

The likelihood that someone will commit crimes of any sort is correlated with the likelihood that they will commit rape. Get the black criminals off the streets and in jails and rape incidence will go down.

"Because most women admit to having them. But mostly because it was funny to juxtapose the Hollywood portrayal of black male sexuality with the reality of 12-year old gang rapists."

You worded it in a really weird way that made it sound as if these women were getting their just desserts because of some weird wish fulfillment fantasy. It's no wonder people reacted to this post so violently.

As someone who grew up in Smyrna, I feel pretty secure in my description and will add the following: that people who have issues with Wilmington being described as South Philly have delusions of grandeur.

As far as the rest I was talking more in culture than anything else. Getting your panties in a bunch about "hurr SUTHERN" is silly when Rehoboth Beach is the San Fransisco of the East Coast and deep in Sussex County. Lighten up a bit.

The fire in Yosemite might have been caused by a Marijuana grow that Illegal Immigrants were tending.**

I'd say it is probably a result of drug laws. Since marijuana can't be grown legally, most people don't grow it on their own land, so have no investment in not destroying the land they are growing it on. Also, since they have to sneak in and out, they probably don't want to either bring in extra equipment that might increase safety, and since they want to remain un-noticed, they are not going to do things like clear extra land to make a safety barrier around any activities that might start a fire.

The fire in Yosemite might have been caused by a Marijuana grow that Illegal Immigrants were tending.**

I'd say it is probably a result of drug laws. Since marijuana can't be grown legally, most people don't grow it on their own land, so have no investment in not destroying the land they are growing it on. Also, since they have to sneak in and out, they probably don't want to either bring in extra equipment that might increase safety, and since they want to remain un-noticed, they are not going to do things like clear extra land to make a safety barrier around any activities that might start a fire.

To the real Ann Morgan--If you go to "Ann Morgan, September 01, 2013 7:48 AM", a person cannot click on your name. Normally, when they click on your handle, your "Blogger" page comes up. It is reasonable to assume someone took your handle for their own designs.