Is There Really Such A Thing As 'Ethical' Meat?A Meat and Dairy Industries Article from All-Creatures.org

FROM

A recent article in the Evening Standard, titled Why ethical meat is
taking over London, speaks of how 'ethical' meat has been a hit in London –
though it doesn't really give any figures to back up this claim.

In short, the 'ethical' claim to this meat is: the cows are 'rare' breeds
and every part of the cow is sold ('from nose to tail'). The Buyacow.uk
website states: "Buyacow.uk connects you to your local, ethical farmers who
rear grass-fed cattle with no hormones, chemicals or preventative
antibiotics...All our cows are happy. They enjoy long and contented lives,
with plenty of space to roam and graze. We think you’ll agree - the proof is
in our beef."

In addition to this, the FAQ section states: "Your cow will be slaughtered
by way of captive bolt at a small-scale artisan butcher. Because we care
about our animals' well-being, your cow will be given three days to get to
know its butcher's voice, behaviour and touch, and adjust to its
surroundings so slaughter takes place without stress."

Ethical claims

This got me thinking about meat production in general, and the ethical
claims made for certain types of meat production – including those employed
by the company in question.

So let's break it down; 'ethical meat' is a myth and here's why: Let's start
with the environmental reasons. Okay, smaller-scale animal farming would
produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions than larger operations; however, when
it comes to plant-based protein production there is no competition.

Research published earlier this year by Oxford University found that
grass-fed beef was still responsible for higher negative environmental
impacts than plant-based food. Lead researcher, Joseph Poore, said:
"Converting grass into [meat] is like converting coal to energy. It comes
with an immense cost in emissions[.]"

Poore also states: "A vegan diet is probably the single biggest way to
reduce your impact on planet Earth, not just greenhouse gases, but global
acidification, eutrophication, land use and water use."

In addition, previous research – coming out of Oxford University’s Food
Climate Research Network (FCRN) – suggested that the belief that grass-fed
farmed animals are good for the environment may be misplaced. Dr. Tara
Garnett, co-author of the report (entitled ‘Grazed and Confused?’) said:
"Ultimately, if high-consuming individuals and countries want to do
something positive for the climate, maintaining their current consumption
levels but simply switching to grass-fed beef is not a solution. Eating less
meat, of all types, is."

Research has shown animal agriculture can have a negative impact on the
environment

Reducing meat production

In short, research shows that switching to a different production method is
not a solution to the environmental impact caused by animal farming – in
particular beef production.

From an environmental perspective, the only real solution is to reduce meat
production, and ergo consumption, ideally to zero. Because when it comes to
other factors such as land use, fresh water use, air pollution and water
pollution, it is difficult to see how any form of meat production can be
deemed environmentally friendly, in comparison to plant-based production.

Now, moving on to the other ethical claims of the article: the animal side
of things. It is often claimed that breeding and eating rare breed animals
is the 'only way' to preserve them.

Animals

Someone once told me: "If we don’t use them, we lose them." There are a
number of ethical issues involved in this: What are 'we' preserving them
for? To look at because they'e pretty?

Or simply for the gratification of eating a seemingly rare animal? I am yet
to see someone demonstrate how breeding and taking ownership of another
sentient being's life, and slaughtering them for products that we do not
need can be ethical.

Animals will fight until their last breath to escape the slaughterhouse, and
to live free from harm. Much like us, they seek to avoid harm and experience
pleasure. And then we come to the slaughter methods that Buyacow.uk say are
implemented.

I'm not going to lie; it is clear that – on the face of things – the methods
employed do seek to reduce suffering as much as possible. It is often said
that buying from local farms and butchers, etc. is the most ethical option.

However, investigations into small family-run abattoir/butcher operations
have shown that regardless of whether the abattoir is a small family-run
operation, or a large industrial operation, illegal abuse and mistreatment
can happen.

In May 2017, Animal Aid released a damning dossier of evidence entitled
Britain's Failing Slaughterhouses. This revealed that 93 percent of
slaughterhouses filmed by Animal Aid and others had been found to be
breaking animal welfare laws.

Obviously, I am not saying that those connected to Buyacow.uk break the law;
however, the point still remains that mistreatment and abuse have been
documented in abattoirs of all sizes and scales. The bolt gun, as referenced
above, is also not without its problems.

Bolt gun

In 2009, Animal Aid investigated Pickstock abattoir in Derbyshire. Over the
course of the investigation – which consisted of placing hidden cameras
inside the abattoir over three days – 2.5 percent of the cows who we filmed
were shot in the head more than once with a captive bolt gun.

One cow in particular ducked his head away from the slaughterer, the
suffering was prolonged as the stun floored him but did not render him
unconscious, and he suffered on the floor for 35 seconds before the
slaughterer was able to suspend himself upside down and shoot him again.

In addition to this, an analysis of slaughterhouse audit reports in 2016
found that not a single one was in full compliance with regulations when
audited by the Food Standards Agency; this included 4,000 serious breaches
of animal welfare laws.

To conclude, it is difficult to see how any farming system that relies on
the breeding and slaughter of animals can be deemed ‘ethical’ or ‘humane’ –
whether from an animal perspective or an environmental one.

As the research shows, a plant-based diet is not only better for animals, it
is also much better for the environment.

Fair Use Notice: This document, and others on our web site, may contain copyrighted
material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners.
We believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use
of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law).
If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use,
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.