If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Welcome to the Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association Forum, we hope you like what you find here and we strongly encourage you to register for an account with us, especially if you are from Pennsylvania. Once registered you will have access to participate in our community. Thanks for visiting and we hope you become a regular!

Shield vs G43

So I'm looking for a single stack 9mm for carry during warmer months and possibly all year around. I've owned the shield 2x before when the G43 was not available, but now that it is I find that I can't ignore it. I've heard ups and downs on the 43 as far as recoil is a bit more and the capacity but I don't think either of those reasons are anything to make my decision. I'd like your opinion on which you prefer and maybe even why you do.

Re: Shield vs G43

I think it is a matter of personal choice and comfort. I have Shields and Glocks. The New Guy coming on the
on the scene is the SIG P365. The M&P Shield grip fits my hand the best, but does not deter me from using
the Glock 43 or Sig P365. The Sig has 10 + 1 capability and a great trigger out of the box.

FUNDAMENTALS

"All that is needed for Evil to Prevail is for Good Men to
do Nothing"

Re: Shield vs G43

If I was in the market for a new small 9 I would probably go with a Sig365. I already have a Shield and LC9. The better trigger and higher capacity in a gun just as small or smaller would be my choice.

Re: Shield vs G43

The 43 is technically better (as in size, ergonomics) and the shield lower priced and very functional. The shield feels like a bar of soap to me, the shape not the slippery. I'd rather a shield be in an evidence locker. They are Dixie cups.