“A SET OF UAE JUDGMENTS WERE UNPAID, REMAINED UNEXECUTED FOR THE LAST 22 YEARS! – BOTH THE GOVERNMENTS, THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND THE U.A.E FEDERATION ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE!”04 August,2017 New Delhi. [First Published in ‘Reparation Law, News]

‘Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, visits Trump in Washington on May 15, 2017 ahead of US president’s trip to Saudi Arabia’

“A SET OF UAE JUDGMENTS WERE UNPAID, REMAINED UNEXECUTED FOR THE LAST 22 YEARS! – BOTH THE GOVERNMENTS, THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND THE U.A.E FEDERATION ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE!”

“UAE paid $10m to settle the U.S. Torture case of its citizen while he was in UAE way back in 1984. The most genuine case of an Indian Investor and Trader in Abu Dhabi, UAE, in 1995, the most heinous and multifarious crimes perpetrated by ‘the de facto head of the UAE Federation, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, on UAE soil, stands unsettled even after twenty two years ridiculing the ‘Judgment Creditor’ of the case, and casting shame on both India and UAE”

We should all be ashamed of the government of India’s rotten and unprincipled diplomacy, in spite of the passing of 4 consecutive Judgments from the UAE Courts, including the ‘Landmark Judgment’ from Apex Court of Abu Dhabi in absolute, in favour of an India-born, Abu Dhabi-based investor and trader, as well as two other judgments from the High Court of Delhi, which was moved after approaching the Hon. Supreme Court of India, against the de facto head of the UAE, the Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who perpetrated, masterminded, and triggered many different kinds of violent crimes against an Indian investor in UAE, including fraud, torture and looting, in order to withdraw a civil lawsuit against his associate, on a building tower contract in 1995.

It is inconceivable that when anti-social elements hatch a conspiracy and attempt virtual destruction of a continued life, the violators of law in the State are protected by the United Arab Emirates. The situation cannot be allowed to pass unnoticed by a responsible and civilized Governments in India, when the facts and files establish such wanton violations of Human Rights against a citizen.

‘The US Authority was keen and honest to take up the case of its citizen with the UAE government and the claim was settled just in 3 years’. On the other hand, the Government of India did an unpardonable mistake of dragging the most legitimate case of an Indian investor and trader in UAE for a long period of 22 years as of now, despite a portfolio of six legal judgments from different Courts in his favour.

‘It would appear that, the big heads in the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, is hand in glove with the criminal nexus in the UAE. Why should the Indian authorities stand in the way and resist an Indian citizen seeking redress and enforcement of a set of foreign judgments in Indian Courts?

The transformation of a U.S. Human Rights Lawsuit against Abu Dhabi’s Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan to a $10 million settlement is a living example of successful foreign relations among responsible States who value the dignity of its citizens’. Honestly, the Government of India should awake and act now or the next generation will feel ashamed of being born in India!

Nearly three decades after the UAE bought the silence of Khaled al-Hassen, a naturalized U.S. citizen, who was allegedly tortured by Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, crown prince of Abu Dhabi, during the 1980s, according to documents leaked from the hacked email account of Yousef al-Otaiba, the Emirati ambassador to the US, obtained media outlets.

Khaled Hassen secured a $10 million settlement in 2013 roughly 3 years after filing the lawsuit in a U.S. District Court, against the top three members of the UAE’s ruling family. As a condition of his settlement, Hassen is not allowed to speak about the case.

Khalid Hassan’s case against three senior members of the UAE ruling family, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, UAE President Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan and retired Brigadier General Saeed Hilal Al-Darmaki, was brought in 2009 before the Federal Court in Los Angeles when Hassan’s lawyers cited the State Department’s telegrams as an evidence of his detention in the UAE, which were published in 2006, that highlight attempts by the US embassy to locate and secure his release.

Khaled Hassen alleged that he was abducted, taken to a secret location, tortured and forced to sign a false confession while working in the United Arab Emirates. The lawsuit seeking civil monetary damages from three members of the royal family in Abu Dhabi, including the Emir, a key U.S. ally in the Middle East.”

After initially denying the charges, the UAE admitted that Hassan was being held by a state security agency under high level government supervision. The attorneys for defendants argued that, litigating plaintiff’s claim in California District would be inefficient and unfair for defendants, who reside in the UAE and hold extremely high governmental positions which require their presence and attention. Therefore, Plaintiff’s claims should be dismissed.

While the judge Dolly Gee, Central District court, warned that the lawsuit may be rejected because the defendants were in the UAE, lawyers argued that the ambassador of the United Arab Emirates was in the US and the judge to accept the case.

Although U.S. Courts normally only hear trials in cases where due process has been exhausted in the country where the crimes were committed, Hassan argued that judiciary in the UAE is run and governed by the same people who tortured him and therefore the trial would not be independent.

During the case the Emirati ambassador to the US was worked behind the scenes to protect members of the ruling family. The president’s name was removed from the case for diplomatic reasons. However, the trial judge would not accept the argument of diplomatic immunity for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and General Saeed al-Darmaki.

By May 2013, a $10 million reparation package had been signed secretly for the closure of the case and for details of it not to be made public. … Read full text ‘Khaled Hassen v. Sheikh Khalifa’

The points raised by the U.S. attorneys for defendants in the torture case, United States, stood a powerful deterrent against his ‘defendants’ in UAE whereas the Indian investor had taken up his case soon after he was attacked, looted and kidnaped, further arbitrarily detained for over a year in different torture chambers in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

All his claims were proved in the legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Hon. Court has issued investigation orders against the conspirators, the Abu Dhabi police and others. To escape from prosecution in the UAE Courts, the winner, the India-born Investor was fraudulently deported to India by the de facto head of UAE, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, kicked off all the Judgments pronounced by the Judiciary, absolutely in favour of the Indian investor. It also questions the integrity of the executive branch and officials of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

The Judgment Creditor, Abu Dhabi-based Indian Investor, contractor and supplier, who has been unable to get justice, lost his entire property, assets and real estate investments; irrecoverable loss of his 3 different business establishments & projects including General Contracting, Electro-Mechanical Est., Building Material Trading etc., worth above US$100 million in 1996, (Ten times the settlement amount won by the U.S. citizen who was tortured by the UAE royals in 1984) brought him in a deplorable health condition for an unduly long period of the past 22 years in spite of the stiff punitive orders slapped by the Supreme Court of that country against the culprits. …Read full text ‘A Fugitive From Law’.

Abu Dhabi Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the UAE Federation, Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, is a fugitive from justice. The Government of India has also helped him remain a ‘fugitive debtor’ all these years! ‘A total shame for the so-called India-UAE relations’!!

The situation is now changing in view of the recent developments in India by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Hague, hearing on Kulbhushan Jadhav’s case. India could espouse a cause against Pakistan, a home to the second-largest number of Indian migrants after the UAE, when the life of an Indian citizen was threatened by actions of that country. Further punitive measures were stopped on the basis of interim orders passed by the International Court of Justice.

In extreme cases of deprivation of the most valuable Human Rights as in the case of the ‘Judgment Creditor’, one would justify for an Indian citizen seeking relief against a foreign state even before international justice flora. The ‘UAE fugitive’, who escaped from prosecution for the last 21 years, may feel the heat of these powerful legal provisions and machineries in the very near future.

Compared to Jadhav, who according to India Jadhav was kidnapped by Pakistani agents from Iran, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ is a noble citizen of India and factually, his ‘kidnapping’ and arbitrary detention were proved in the legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE). The Hon. Court was issued investigation orders against Abu Dhabi police & a local Emirati, an associate of the office of the ‘Crown Prince’ of Abu Dhabi, (With whom a civil lawsuit was filed by the ‘Judgment Creditor’ in a dispute of an apartment tower) and stiff punitive orders were slapped by the Supreme Court of that country.

Instead of enforcement of judgments the ‘head of the Abu Dhabi, UAE (de facto ruler)’ has repeatedly obstructed the administration of justice to cover up his link with the heinous acts of the notorious state police. The injustices and cruelties by the Executive of Abu Dhabi, UAE, against the ‘Judgment Creditor’, an Indian investor, remains a serious case with highest credibility over any other case in India for the World Court.

The Indian investor had built up in Abu Dhabi, UAE an enviable business empire of Engineering, Trading & General Contracting, 3 different establishments with all sort of infrastructure including warehouses, fully equipped electro-mechanical lab, workshop, staff quarters and other real estate investments etc., that worth US$100 million apart from work contracts and reputation, with his prime years, commanding respect of many of his clients and well wishers in the region.

The investor was entrapped in a criminal case, kept isolated in hellholes in different detention centres and brutally tortured and traumatised. He was continued under detention arbitrarily under squalid conditions, often solitary confinement, in order to humiliate or degrade him and was inaccessible by any of his staff or counsels.

Nevertheless, he could fight his case by his own; whereupon the UAE Courts declared him innocent, the case was false; framed by Abu Dhabi policemen with malicious intentions. The Court ordered the state authority to prosecute both the policemen and the local Emirati. The Criminal Court observed that, the Interim Judgment of the Abu Dhabi Civil Court, ruled that the ‘Judgment Creditor’ [who was the petitioner in the said case] was the really aggrieved person and had deserved help.

The police dropped charges and plead guilty in the final stage of criminal proceedings. The Apex Court directed the authority to restore the Judgment Creditor’s dignity and compensate the ‘Judgment Creditor’ for all losses and sufferings inflicted upon by Abu Dhabi police.

In total negation of the Rule of Law of the country and kicking off all the Judgments pronounced by the Judiciary, including the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, the investor, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was deported from UAE with fraudulent claims by the ‘Emir’. Thus the ‘Emir’, the de facto ruler, turned himself to be a cruel Fugitive from Law to hide his face.

Thereafter, the personal representations to the Union Government of India, including the United Nations & the NHRC, and legal proceedings were initiated in India by the victim, the ‘Judgment Creditor’. All his pursuit of justice for the past two decades turned in vain, despite 2 Judgments from the Delhi High Court in 1997 & 2007 respectively, directing the Union Government to settle the case with their UAE counterpart.

The Government of India was in a clear breach of its obligations by ignoring the monstrous injustices and cruelties inflicted upon an Indian citizen, the irrecoverable loss of his huge business assets, the deplorable condition of his health, and most important of all, a portfolio of 4 consecutive Judgments absolutely in his favour by the learned Judges of the different Courts of a foreign state, Abu Dhabi, UAE, including the Apex Court.

The ‘Judgment Creditor’, an investor in UAE, had to undergo extremes of violence and abuses by the Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi [Including the 'wilful inactions' by the government of India] consist of:-

a) He was literally kidnapped from his office and huge money was looted from his office by the police officials of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

b) He was brutally tortured, and detained in hellholes under squalid conditions for a long period, in order to blackmail him to withdraw a civil lawsuit, against a local Emirati.

c) His younger brother was also tortured and severely traumatized in front of him to withdraw the civil lawsuit and extort money from the ‘Judgment Creditor’.

d) During this long spell of illegal detention, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was denied wholesome food, drinking water, medical attention and was inaccessible by his staff or counsels.

e) He was held arbitrarily in different detention centres, often solitary confinement without basic amenities, throughout the period of detention and trial, which ruined his entire life.

f) The Legal Court of First Instance of Abu Dhabi was declared that the conduct of the policemen clearly proved the malicious motives in initiating a criminal complaint against the ‘Judgment Creditor’. The police dropped charges framed against the ‘Judgment Creditor’ and plead guilty in the legal court after an investigation orders passed against police. However, an order of enquiry passed by the Legal Court against the conduct of the Policemen (and beyond) was ignored by the Abu Dhabi authority. The conduct of the Prosecutor too was condemned.

g) His detention, malicious and deliberate misuse of power, were continued even after the Trial Court Judgment, after a full and fair trial acquitted him, the ‘Judgment Creditor’.

h) The Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE, passed stiff punitive orders against the Abu Dhabi police and strongly condemned the prosecution in its ‘Landmark Judgment’ but the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was not released from prison.

i) All the four expeditious Judicial Verdicts of Abu Dhabi Courts were repeatedly obstructed, kicked off and violated the basic principles of a civilized Government of honouring verdict of the judiciary, Executive abiding by such verdict.

j) All these atrocities that took place against the ‘Judgment Creditor’, when the final decision of his civil lawsuit on an apartment tower, was due to be announced by the Legal Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE. As the petitioner of existing civil lawsuit, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ had already received an Interim Judgment from the Hon’ ble Court in his favour.

k) Worst still, even after the Appellate Court affirming the decision of the trial Court, entitling the ‘Judgment Creditor’ to be set at liberty and receive back all assets deprived, and other rights and privileges restored, the ‘Head’ of Abu Dhabi, UAE, fraudulently ordered the deportation of the ‘Judgment Creditor’ from UAE instead, with only his ‘wearing apparel’, to be back in India.

l) He had built up in Abu Dhabi a group of businesses of Engineering, Trading & Contracting and assets worth US$100 million way back in 1995. He lost all his investments and business assets as an aftermath of his illegal deportation.

m) Refusal of the government of India, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), to consider the representations of the ‘Judgment Creditor’ detailing the patent violation of Human Rights by the UAE, despite 4 consecutive Judgments from the UAE Courts, and 2 other Judgments from the High Court of Delhi after approaching the Hon. Supreme Court of India.

n) The ‘Judgment Creditor’ is still under arbitrary detention in various forms, denying his property, fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of his human dignity for the last 21 years that followed.

There cannot be any doubt or dispute about the averments of the ‘Judgment Creditor’, all the claims he had made, as they are fully supported by the orders of Courts both India and UAE, and the official documents of the governments of India UAE.

Under international law, the state is responsible for all actions or omissions of its officials and organs. This is the function of the basic rules of international law concerning the responsibility of States for their internationally wrongful acts and the legal consequences which flow there-from. The ‘successor governments’ also remain bound by the acts incurred by the ‘predecessor governments’.

The evidence is supplemented and corroborated by other documents produced hereunder and enumerated to the sake of convenience.

The State practice of International Law in India, no doubt, is purely based on vote-bank politics and not for the administration of justice. The India-US row in 2013-14 over the arrest of Deputy consul-general Devyani Khobragade, who was indicted for visa fraud in New York (who also blatantly violated the Indian passport act), has revealed this dirty secret.

Nevertheless, no justification whatsoever can exist for India’s erroneous inaction for more than two decades for such lapses. And those Judgments remain unexecuted even after 21 years of their signing by the Abu Dhabi judiciary, UAE, perhaps a unique phenomenon, most eligible to be recorded in Guinness Book!

The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India

‘The Shameful Acts of The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), The Government of India’

The case of the ‘JudgmentCreditor’, an Indian investor in the UAE, had already been fought at length, at three Courts in Abu Dhabi, UAE. All the three Courts including the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi had passed clear and concrete orders in the case, directing the authority to enforce the Judgments. To save face, the Executive of Abu Dhabi, fraudulently deported the ‘Judgment Creditor’ to India and leaving the guilty unpunished.

This led to the Judgment Creditor’s character assassination, who was an investor with a group of business entities in UAE worth millions of investments, leaving him in a whirlpool of mental strain and physical trauma.

The Delhi High Court heard the case of ‘Judgment Creditor’, and issued a ‘Mandamus Order’ to the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, to settle the case in 2 months with the UAE.

At this juncture, all that was required from the Government of India was to take up the issue direct with the authorities of Abu Dhabi, to enforce the Judgments of the Supreme of Abu Dhabi, without further delay.

Instead, Mr. N.U. Avirachan, Undersecretary, Ministry of External Affairs had sent this letter No.T-4113/3/96 to Mr Balasubramanian, Second Sef India (Cons), Embassy of Abu Dhabi, UAE, which was written without adhering to the provisions of law. It was this very letter by the Government of India which spoiled the settlement of the case of the Judgment Creditor.

‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’ Launches Global Campaign to Expose the UAE fraudster(s) and its counterparts in India, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the Government of India, who fooled the whole world for the last two decades, in this case.

“Twenty one years of arbitrary detention in various forms by the UAE administration, denying fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of human dignity”.

The UAE has so far failed to recognize and protect the rights to justice despite 4 consecutive judgments in absolute in favour of an Indian investor, the ‘Judgment Creditor’. He was denied dignity, respect, his freedom and access to his business assets spread over three establishments in Abu Dhabi, UAE from 1995. All that pending is the ‘execution of those Judgements, solely due to the inhuman approach of the concerned authorities representing both India and UAE.

The State practice of International Law in India is purely based on vote-bank politics. No justification can exist for ignoring such an extreme violations of Human Rights. ‘Full Text’

‘Judgment For Sale’ is a global campaign, primarily organized by voluntary member contributions. It’s a value added, investment campaign, aimed to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud or other heinous acts to avoid honouring their obligations.

As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the winner has every right to offer his un-executed Judgments for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity.

The Shocking History of ‘Al Wathba’ Central Prison, Abu Dhabi and a ‘Culture of Deception & Secrecy’

THE SHOCKING HISTORY OF ‘AL WATHBA’ CENTRAL PRISON, ABU DHABI AND A ‘CULTURE OF DECEPTION & SECRECY’

The article about Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi, appeared sometime back in the Nationalae, [a government-owned English-language newspaper published in Abu Dhabi] exposed just a little bit of truth and full of lies of the most notorious prison in Abu Dhabi, UAE. The author of the article was not in a position to reveal the facts about the cruelties and brutal conditions once existed there, and the changes that have taken place to respect the Human Rights.

This ‘Judgment Creditor’, an Indian investor, was arbitrarily detained at Al Wathba Prison, in order to withdraw a civil lawsuit in his favour in 1995 – 96. His opponents were not ordinary criminals, they were the ‘custodians of the law’ and the de facto ruler of the Abu Dhabi, UAE. Despite his holding 4 consecutive Judgments absolutely in his favour from Abu Dhabi Courts including the Supreme Court, he was deported by them to save face further to escape from the Court ordered reparations.

On reaching India, he took up his case [the non-execution of the 'Court Judgments including the Investigation Orders' against the Abu Dhabi Police and beyond], along with the pleas and sufferings of hundreds of Al-Wathba prisoners to the United Nations, International NGO’s including the media.

Dear readers are requested to go through (please do) the materials and documents furnished herein below and realize the type of torture and ill-treatments that were given in those days to the inmates at Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi.

THE SITUATION IN ‘CENTRAL PRISON, AL WATHBA, ABU DHABI, UAE’ IN 1995 – 1996 – AS SEEN BY THE JUDGMENT CREDITOR:-

The Wathba Central prison was overcrowded with more than three thousand prisoners, mostly Indian nationals. In scorching heat of the desert, within concrete cages, prisoners were made to live in inhuman conditions without the basic necessities of life. Not even a fan was provided in those concrete cages.

Hundreds of ‘prisoners’ rotting in different blocks who have lost their mental balance and the ability to lead a normal life once they are released. Visiting dignitaries were led through separate corridors of the prison where there is discipline and respect for law.

ONLY ROTTEN AND SPOILED FOOD WERE GIVEN TO THE PRISONERS:-

The food was most unpalatable and unhygienic. Prisoners sustain their life with fermented camel meat and wormy food-grains and clamoured there for a glass of cold water in the hot summer days.

Many prisoners were dumped in the corridors and pinning for a little cool breeze. Even a breath of fresh air was a precious boon for them! The heartening fact is that many innocents are made to languish here under the banner of criminals which cast a stigma on them for life.

IT’S REALLY USEFUL FOR THE RESEARCHERS IF THEY READ THE CONTENT OF LINKS GIVEN BELOW:

‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’ Launches Global Campaign to Expose the UAE fraudster(s) and its counterparts in India, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the Government of India, who fooled the whole world for the last two decades, in this case.

“Twenty one years of arbitrary detention in various forms by the UAE administration, denying fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of human dignity”.

The UAE has so far failed to recognize and protect the rights to justice despite 4 consecutive judgments in absolute in favour of an Indian investor, the ‘Judgment Creditor’. He was denied dignity, respect, his freedom and access to his business assets spread over three establishments in Abu Dhabi, UAE from 1995. All that pending is the ‘execution of those Judgements, solely due to the inhuman approach of the concerned authorities representing both India and UAE.

The State practice of International Law in India is purely based on vote-bank politics. No justification can exist for ignoring such an extreme violations of Human Rights. ‘Full Text’

‘Judgment For Sale’ is a global campaign, primarily organized by voluntary member contributions. It’s a value added, investment campaign, aimed to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud or other heinous acts to avoid honouring their obligations.

As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the winner has every right to offer his un-executed Judgments for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity.

After the ‘Whistleblower lawsuit’ in Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi against the ‘UAE ruler’ who have perpetrated significant abuses and fraud, a representation was submitted to the then President of India on the proposed India-UAE Extradition Treaty, by the ‘#JudgmentCreditor’. The original representation was dated 24-11-1997.

A copy of which had been handed over in person to the then President of India Shri K.R.Narayanan during his official visit to #Kerala in 1999. The Hon’ble President of India was kind enough to transfer the representation to the ‘top bureaucrats’ in South Block, Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, with his comments. [LINK]

DEPORTATION vs EXTRADITION:

Deportation is the simple removal of a person from a country, but the Extradition, which is a complex judicial procedure by which a fugitive held by one government is handed over to another government to face state prosecution. “Extradition is possible only between ‘commendable’ states, that is, towards countries in which the minimum standards of the state of law are respected”

PAKISTANI BUSINESSMAN WILL NOT BE EXTRADITED TO UAE, CITING THE RISK OF TORTURE, LONDON COURT [2010]

In contrast, a similar view in support of an expatriate was expressed by the English High Court, London, in 2010 and quashed the British government’s decision to extradite Mohammed Lodhi, a Pakistani businessman to the UAE, citing the risk of torture or inhuman treatment in the UAE. Lodhi, who ran an equipment business in the 1990s in the emirates of Sharjah and Umm al-Quwain, claimed that a business dispute with influential members of the ruling family led to him being charged with making drugs.

His lawyers had pointed to concerns over HumanRights in the UAE raised by the case of Sheikh Issa bin Zayed Al Nayhan, the brother of Crown Prince MohammedBinZayed Al Nahyan, of torturing an Afghan trader that was videoed and posted on the internet.

The judge at Westminster magistrates court in London ruled there was a risk that Yasir Afsar, a British Pakistani, would be “subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” if sent back to the UAE. [LINK]

UAE EXTRADITION REQUESTS REJECTED IN ITALY IN 2016:

Another legal battle in 2016, a foreigner sought civil relief through the UAE Courts but then became aware that the opposition was seeking to retaliate criminally. He fled the UAE, knowing that he could not win against such influential parties. He was later placed on Interpol and arrested in Italy where the UAE pursued extradition. Fortunately on human rights grounds, Italy ruled against extradition. [LINK]

‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’ Launches Global Campaign to Expose the UAE fraudster(s) and its counterparts in India, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the Government of India, who fooled the whole world for the last two decades, in this case.

“Twenty one years of arbitrary detention in various forms by the UAE administration, denying fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of human dignity”.

The UAE has so far failed to recognize and protect the rights to justice despite 4 consecutive judgments in absolute in favour of an Indian investor, the ‘Judgment Creditor’. He was denied dignity, respect, his freedom and access to his business assets spread over three establishments in Abu Dhabi, UAE from 1995. All that pending is the ‘execution of those Judgements, solely due to the inhuman approach of the concerned authorities representing both India and UAE.

The State practice of International Law in India is purely based on vote-bank politics. No justification can exist for ignoring such an extreme violations of Human Rights. ‘Full Text’

‘Judgment For Sale’ is a global campaign, primarily organized by voluntary member contributions. It’s a value added, investment campaign, aimed to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud or other heinous acts to avoid honoring their obligations.

As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the winner has every right to offer his un-executed Judgments for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity.

‘21 YEARS OF ARBITRARY DETENTION IN VARIOUS FORMS BY THE UAE ADMINISTRATION, DENYING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND GROSSLY OFFENDING THE VALUES OF HUMAN DIGNITY’!

In the instant case, the Emir, the de facto ruler of Abu Dhabi, UAE, played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for the law abiding citizens!

“21 years back an Indian investor cum contractor in UAE was attacked at his office by some criminal opponents from Abu Dhabi police dpt., looted money and valuables, entangled him in a false case and threatened of dire consequences in order to withdraw a civil lawsuit on a multi-storey apartment tower located in Abu Dhabi.

The victim was taken to a detention centre, brutally tortured and arbitrarily detained. It took six long months to produce him to the Court.

He could convince the Judiciary of Abu Dhabi, that these policemen were acting upon the instructions of the ruling elite.

The Hon. Court moved swiftly with the evidences in front of them, declared the accused is innocent and issued an investigation order against the Abu Dhabi Police.

Subsequently, the full bench in Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE, sat together and heard the case at length on immediate basis and approved the Lower Court Judgment in less than two months.

Four expeditious Judicial Verdicts of Abu Dhabi Courts were kicked off by the ‘Emir’, unexecuted. In the instant case, the ‘Emir’ played a full-length drama of cowardice. It remains a global shame for the law abiding citizens.

The ‘legal fight for the enforcement of judgments’ took in very many proceedings before the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi.

The provisions of the Constitution of India, Article 51, has great relevance and application in the victim’s case, apart from International Customary Law and Treaty Obligations.

Despite the directive of the Delhi High Court, the Government of India has not discharged its duties as indicated in the judicial order.

The State practice of International Law in India is purely based on vote-bank politics. No justification can exist for ignoring such an extreme violations of Human Rights. ‘Full Text’

‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’ Launches Global Campaign to Expose the UAE fraudster(s) and its counterparts in India, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the Government of India, who fooled the whole world for the last two decades, in this case.

“Twenty one years of arbitrary detention in various forms by the UAE administration, denying fundamental rights and grossly offending the values of human dignity”.

‘Judgment For Sale’ is a global campaign, primarily organized by voluntary member contributions. It’s a value added, investment campaign, aimed to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud or other heinous acts to avoid honoring their obligations.

As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the winner has every right to offer his un-executed Judgments for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity.

Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!

An Open Appeal to all Indians on the Occasion of the 68th Anniversary of India’s Republic Day 2017!

If We Really Stand For The Independent India, The Values of Democracy and Respect For Human Rights: “Observe The Republic Day of India 2017 As ‘Black Day’, on the following Crystal Clear Reasons:-

Abu Dhabi crown prince, Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, is invited to be the chief guest of India’s Republic Day 2017. To add fuel to the fire the “UAE Army has also been invited to participate in the Republic Day Parade 2017″ during which the chief guest will be the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi.

Mohammed Bin Zayed represents the UAE as the de facto ruler of UAE Federation. UAE is attributed to authoritarian regime with blood-stained hands, lacks accountability and total lack of judicial independence. Any one who dares to criticize the regime risk arrest, torture, arbitrary detentions and enforced disappearance.

The Army in question was trained by the notorious company once known as ‘BlackWater’, and recruited foreign mercenaries, originally intended to butcher their citizens who claim for democracy. The UAE is a member of Saudi-led ‘anti-terror’ coalition on which the Pakistani army chief [retired] Gen Raheel Sharif is the head.

The UAE and its army both have proved by meddling its neighbouring countries that the victory of the people against any repressive regime in the Arab world is more dangerous than defeat!

ENFORCEMENT OF LANDMARK UAE JUDGMENTS – ‘JABIR CASE’

Most importantly, there’s no respect for even the Judgments of the Supreme Court of that country. The UAE Federation is the worst wilful defaulter of the 4 consecutive Judgments passed against them by the Courts of Abu Dhabi in the most shocking and gruesome case of an Indian investor’. During the course of hearing the wrong-doers pleaded guilty ‘of their framing a false case against the Indian investor’ to withdraw a civil lawsuit of a building contract.

The Court of First Instance in Abu Dhabi, UAE, had specifically ordered investigation against their corrupt and conniving officials who looted money and valuables from the office of Indian investor. The Full Bench of the Apex Court unanimously upheld the findings, precisely in line with the Lower Courts’ Judgments.

The UAE Federation did not comply with the Judicial directives of the Courts of Abu Dhabi. Instead, the Federation deliberately and maliciously deported him, the ‘Judgment Creditor’, from the UAE, denying him access even to his business assets spread over three establishments in Abu Dhabi, UAE, were worth One Hundred Million US Dollars in 1995.

This resulted his character assassination, leaving him in a whirl-pool of unimaginable mental trauma and thus the UAE Federation is accountable for its violation of Judicial decisions at first place.

His claims against UAE were recognized by both the Supreme Court and the High Court of Delhi and ordered the Government of India to settle the case in two months, way back in 1997! All that is pending is the ‘execution of those Judgements, solely due to the inhuman approach of the concerned authorities representing both India and UAE.

A vicarious liability exists under general law. The violation of a specific directive of a Court of Law, renders the Abu Dhabi, UAE Federation, as a ‘Wilful Defaulter’, liable for the compensation due to the Petitioner, the ‘Judgment Creditor’.

Under the above grave backgrounds, the Abu Dhabi crown prince cannot be made in a list of the distinguished chief guests of India’s Republic Day Celebrations. The Republic Day of India commemorates the date January 26, 1950, on which the Constitution of India came into force.

Indians celebrated Republic Day all these years to strengthen the dynamics of a democratic values and to honour India’s great men and women who had sacrificed all the way. We were quite fair so far, when we had distinguished personalities like Obama, Hollande etc., as our Chief Guests on our Republic Day ceremonies in the past.

The ‘Judgment Creditor’ is therefore soliciting your wholehearted support in his unique case to get Justice, in a portfolio of Landmark Judgments passed in absolute in his favour, by the highest Judiciary of Abu Dhabi and subsequent Judgments from Delhi High Court in the case, the benefits of which have been denied to him arbitrarily and inhumanly over an unduly long period of two decades, defeating all his relentless fight.

The ‘Judgment Creditor’ wishes to observe India’s Republic Day 2017 as a Black Day, in Protest Against the Non-enforcement of Legal Judgments” by both the Governments, the Government of UAE and the Government of India!

He requests all Indians to join him in his protest against the decision of the Government of India with all supports to him.

The ‘Decree Holder’, who was put to suffer physical, emotional and financial harm as a direct result of heinous crimes committed by the ‘Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi’, UAE, despite repeated ‘Decrees’ of the Highest Courts, now selling the Portfolios of UAE Debts. You can be the ‘Holder of Decree’ or a Creditor representing the ‘Decree holder’ (Judgment Creditor), at your place. “Avail this unique opportunity to secure your profit which jumps 5 to 10-folds and, simultaneously, become a ‘volunteer’ for the principles of Equity and Social Justice”.

“SPECIAL‘ANNIVERSARY OFFERS’ FOR A LIMITED TIME ONLY”
The UAE Judgment Equities (UAE Debts) has been guaranteed five times more value
on your investments even if the ‘Debtors’ settle it within the first week of your joining! ‘…Brochure’

The enforcement of UAE Judgment is stressful but ultimately very rewarding!

[“A creditor is worse than a slave-owner,” Victor Hugo once wrote. “For the master only owns your person, but a creditor owns your dignity, and can command it."]
There are diabolical debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud or other heinous acts to avoid honouring their obligations under the judgments. The enforcement process, therefore, becomes time consuming, expensive and stressful. Whatever the reason may be, the UAE Judgment debtor(s) will stand as the fiscally responsible party until the Court Judgment is satisfied. His responsibility to do so will pass on to his successor-in-office; the successor regime is obliged to compensate the victim of state wrongs.

In the instant case, the ‘Defaulter-Judgment debtor(s)’ can be legally proceeded against. Besides, the Judgment Creditor is entitled to ‘Mortgage’ his Judgment; the Debtor’s assets could be seized and sold to satisfy the debts. The Judgment Creditor is also legally eligible to transfer his Judgment, part or whole.

Feedback: “We are shocked at the incredible extent of inhuman cruelty against which the whole world should wake up. Your account should get wider publicity, so that larger number of people would become aware of such denial human rights”. … ‘Full Text’

HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF A CASE LIKE THIS?

A true story of ‘outright fraud’ perpetrated by a wealthiest ruling regime of the world, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE)Getting a Judgment in a civil lawsuit means the ‘Decree holder’ is then entitled to recover the money and damages from the debtor. But in this unique and historic case that arose in Abu Dhabi, the ‘Emirati debtor’ , who took it as a revenge, trespassed into the office of the ‘Decree holder’ along with his accomplice, a ‘Policeman’ in plain clothes, who held a heavy iron rod of one meter length in one hand and on the other hand a chained handcuff; with which the Decree holder was beaten up in cold blood and a well-planned looting and extortion was forced up on.

The policeman forcibly broke open the office locker with the iron rod in his hand and looted US$.4m worth money and valuables. The Decree holder locked the door and called the police for protection. The police did come, but instead of protecting him from the trespassers, they joined hands with them and the Decree holder was attacked further, shackled, brutally tortured and was literally dragged out of his office and taken to secret ‘detention centre’ . The Decree Holder who was the complainant in the civil lawsuit in a ‘Real Estate Deal’ of a nine storeyed building against the said Emirati debtor, involving above USD 3,00,000.00 Per Annum (INR 2 Crores), way back in the year 1995, had been blackmailed, treated as a criminal and was beaten near-death.

The ‘Decree holder’ became unconscious and soon thereafter he was taken to hospital-emergency, Abu Dhabi. He was subjected to the greatest ordeals by being taken from hospital to an ‘underground lock-up’ and kept incommunicado in solitary confinement. The victim was later taken to central prison at Al Wathba, Abu Dhabi. It took a long period of six months for the person to have his first appearance in the Court. The victim was implicated for ‘using force against Government employee and assault’.

The criminal court found that the case was fully false and fabricated, therefore, the Court ordered the Prosecution to investigate the crime committed by the policemen and the local. Instead of investigating the crime, the Prosecution went to appeal. When the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, comprising a three-judge panel, ordered the immediate release of the victim from prison, all of them dropped the charges they had deliberately made against the victim, the ‘Decree holder’.

The Court ordered the state authority to prosecute both the policemen and the local Emirati and to restore the victim’s dignity and to compensate him for all his losses. “The Court, the three-judge supreme bench, praised the appropriate conduct and courage of the victim in their ‘Landmark Judgment’ and concluded that the victim is innocent; rather ‘a martyr.

Even though the Juries in different Courts of Abu Dhabi, had taken a series of decisions in this case, in absolute terms in favour of the victim, strangely enough, none of those Court Orders were executed by the UAE authority. Instead of rightly accepting the blame for the gross misconduct of their Policemen and also the Prosecution, the ‘State authority issued an ‘extremely fraudulent order’ to expel the ‘Decree holder’ from their country, as if he had been punished for a crime. The ‘Decree holder’, the then holder of ‘four consecutive Judgments’ in absolute terms in his favour, therefore, was deported from the UAE, that too at highest risk of being multiplied victimization.

‘Such a punishable fraud of misrepresenting the facts perpetrated by the UAE authority, for deporting the ‘Judgment Creditor’, who was an Indian investor with ‘three valid trade licenses’ of well established and profitable ‘General Contracting and Trading Firms’ under his full ownership in Abu Dhabi’ (The assets of which were valued a minimum One Hundred Million US$ Dollars at the time of his mishap in Abu Dhabi), resulting in total destruction of his life, his businesses and his profession, adds inescapable burden on the ‘Wilful Defaulters’ of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Back in India, consequent on the gravest cruelties and injustices meted out to him in Abu Dhabi, UAE, it was the primary duty of the ‘Government of India’ to protect the ‘Judgment Creditor’, his dignity and justice; and to help the victims of many other forms in a similar situation in that country. Unfortunately, this historic case of a Non-resident Indian-investor had been buried in the darkness for two decades by the Indian authorities, despite repeated representations and two specific Judgments from Delhi High Court in 1997 & 2007 respectively which were filed by the ‘Judgment Creditor’ as directed by the Supreme Court of India.

It was the statutory obligation of Government of India to take all necessary measures as instructed by the High Court of Delhi as early in the year of 1997 in order to enforce the valid Legal Judgments, passed by the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE. “The subject who has suffered the injury is not the individual person but the State itself”; as explained by ‘Professor Theo van Boven’ (1934-1983).

“The foreign State, UAE, was bound to provide appropriate reliefs to the ‘Judgment Creditor’, whose ‘Constitutional Rights’ have been blatantly violated in the first place by Abu Dhabi police to extort money and valuables.

The UAE authorities were further bound to provide proper remedies for the repeated victimizations which the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was forced to suffer as a consequence of the unique and the most barbaric, ‘fraudulent misrepresentation’ perpetrated by the executive branch to ‘deport’ him from that country. It has resulted in the colossal losses of billions of US$ Dollars to the Judgment Creditor’s various business institutions in the UAE, apart from the consequences of his physical and psychological trauma, the emotional pain and ‘sufferings’ which forced him to live a lost life for all the years that followed”.

The accumulated ‘case histories of injustices’ received by the ‘Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell (Est.1996)’ from different quarters of Arab Gulf, forced the ‘Judgment Creditor’ to endeavour towards formulation and implementation of the ‘Mutual Human Rights Law and Reparation Mechanisms’ between the Government of India and the Gulf (Gulf Cooperation Council – GCC) countries, mandating our elected representatives and officials to effectively intervene in eliminating discrimination and imbalances of ‘Indian Diaspora’ working in different countries.

The enforcement of Judgments and legal remedies is a fundamental element of the rule of law which is an integral part of ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation’ Movement; this also involves the recognition and protection of the dignity of individuals. The mandate of the UN General Assembly resolution ‘A/RES/60/147’ reads the ‘States should ensure that their domestic law is consistent with their international legal obligations’.

The regional inter-Governmental Human Rights Mechanisms of ‘American States’ signed with its neighbouring countries in 1948, the ‘Council of Europe’ adopted it in 1950, and the similar ‘Charter in Africa’ adopted in 1987, are prominent illustrations of the expanding vistas of Human Rights. This constitutional approach basically protects them from all forms of exploitation and social injustices from foreign States even outside the Charter.

It’s a ‘shameful fact’ that similar arrangements haven’t even been conceived yet by the Government of India. As a result, the Indian expatriates are exposed to the extreme degree of Human Rights Violations in the Arab Gulf. Once the ‘Charter’ is implemented, millions of ‘Indian Diaspora’ and their families will be the primary beneficiaries of ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ .

HERE WE TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT’S THE LEGAL POINTS OF INTEREST:

“The Doctrine of State Immunity”

In a landmark case, the ‘secret’ wife of the late King of Saudi Arabia has won the right to sue his son and Saudi prince for breaching a contract. The king’s son, argued he had “state immunity” and the court had no jurisdiction to try Mrs Harb’s claim. But Mrs Justice Rose, the High Court of England and Wales, threw out the prince’s argument, confirming that personal immunity ceases when a head of State is no longer in office for any reason. Link: ‘U.K. High Court Judgment’

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India has observed that Decree Holders must enjoy the fruits of the decree obtained by them in an expeditious manner. The Bench, speaking through Justice Dave, has noted the unscrupulous tactics used by Judgment Debtors to evade the process of law and eventually frustrate the entire efforts of a Decree Holder in getting the decree executed. Link: ‘Supreme Court Judgment’

The term “Fraud” has been clearly analyzed and adjudged by the highest Judiciary of India. The Supreme Court reiterated that ‘fraud vitiates all’ and also the age old saying ‘Fraud avoids all judicial acts ecclesiastical or temporal’. Fraud is an act of deliberate deception with a design to secure something, which is otherwise not due. The expression “fraud” involves two elements, deceit and injury to the person deceived. It is a cheating intended to get an advantage. Link: ‘Supreme Court Judgment’

“UNVEILS INDUSTRY’S FIRST JUDGMENT EQUITY FUND”

“Support the “Judgment Creditor” to strengthen the Integrity of the Judiciary and people’s confidence in our Justice System”

Funds are proposed to be raised by distribution of shares. One can invest a sum as small as USD$ 350.00 or equivalent currency in the ‘Portfolios of UAE Judgments’ now on sale. The UAE Judgments, against the ‘Abu Dhabi Executive Branch’, have been guaranteed ‘FIVE’ times more value of their investment. This is a special, limited time opportunity to all, including the UAE lobbyists, who believe in the present ‘Status and Future of the UAE’.

The unique features of the Judgment Equity offered for sale are too numerous to be enlisted, but a few among them which are really outstanding and the
most significant ones are:

[Special ‘Anniversary Offers’ for a Limited Time: The UAE Judgment Equities (UAE Debts) has been guaranteed five times more value on your investments even
if the ‘debtors’ settle it within the first week of your joining!]

Free Equities Offered:Pay just 35% of its precise value and enjoy profit for 100%;
Guaranteed Interest: 4.5% Per year, for both the principal and the accrued interest;
Guaranteed Discount: Investor will be paid up to 25% discount for every additional sale;
Transferee Rights: The term ‘Holder of a Decree’ is equal to that of the Judgment Creditor;
Conversion Rights: Investors may convert their equity fund into stock through the idpo.org.
View the list of features here: Sales Brochure

End Note: The observation of ‘Hillary Clinton’ on strength and money as essentials linked with Human Rights could be usefully extracted. They read: “Strength, Money, and Knowledge – we cannot do anything without them” – ‘Judgment Creditor’.

[An innovative project by the ‘Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell’ promoted by the “Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks”, aimed at giving effect to the ‘Legal Judgments’ that remains unexecuted or unsatisfied].

Last updated: Monday 29 Feb, 2016

We would love to hear your comments. A selection of your comments will be
published unless you state otherwise. ‘UAE@DECREEHOLDERS.COM’

Ever heard of a victim marking and celebrating the 20th anniversary of the gravest disaster in his life? It’s the tragic drama of the ‘Judgment Creditor’, in real life. He is not celebrating it with cheers, but with agonizing memories of the nightmare of the disaster which shattered all his fortunes and pushed him to a state of complete derailment of his enviable physical, mental, financial and social well-being; and made him to live a lost life for all the years that followed.

Regrettably, the credit goes to ‘the Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi’, who set ablaze the destruction, by issuing an extremely “Fraudulent Misrepresentation” to deport the ‘Judgment Creditor’ from that country. Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one makes representation with intent to deceive and with the knowledge that it is false; allows for a remedy of damages and rescission. Had the judicious judgment of the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi in absolute terms in favour of the Judgment Creditor been executed in time, his agonies could have been abated two decades back!.

The victim, the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was an investor in Abu Dhabi, his ‘Business Assets’, contracting and trading firms, stood valued at a minimum of One Hundred Million U.S. Dollars when the dreadful tragedy took place at the prime of his life. The ‘Judgment Creditor’ is forced to mark this twentieth anniversary of ‘Looting and Extortion’ by the Abu Dhabi police, in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE), due to the Non-execution of the country’s ‘Landmark Judgments’.

Read the shocking story of police looting, the bizarre twist in the case of police extortion in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (U.A.E)

The expatriates being robbed of their wealth and valuables and exploited by local people pretending to be cops is not at all sensational news in the UAE. But in this true incident under report which took place on Thursday, 26th October, 1995 the policeman who played the lead role in looting was ‘a real police officer who was working in Abu Dhabi police department’.

The victim, in the incident was a high earning engineering expert and investor, deeply committed to his profession with his three major business establishments including ‘Engineering, Contracting and Trading’ in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

A brief background of the story
On behalf of his principal company, the ‘Premier General Contracting Establishment’, the contractor had signed a business contract with an Emirati, ‘Mr Hassan Saeed Hassan’, covering a Nine Storied Building proposed to be leased out for a sum of 10,80,000.00 UAE Dirhams (AED 1.08million) Per Annum.

When a dispute arose with Mr Hassan Saeed, the contractor, on the basis of legal advice, instituted a Civil Suit in Abu Dhabi Court for settling the issue. The ill-intention of the local was that, he wanted to cancel the lease deed when the restoration of entire building was over. The conspiracy on the part of Hassan Saeed, to avoid paying debts was one of the important and thrusting points in the civil suit.

The Honourable Judge of the Civil Court took a decision in favour of the contractor. Consequently, Hassan Saeed got annoyed and insisted the contractor to withdraw the lawsuit unilaterally.

Scene 1.
Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Khadir, a policeman in plain clothes from Abu Dhabi police (who haven’t been disclosed his identity), along with Hassan Saeed Hassan (the Emirati, accused in the civil case, who has already been warned by the Civil Court against his wrongful motives) came to the contractor’s office.

The policeman in plain clothes, who had come prepared and was shouting and rotating an iron rod of one meter length in one hand; and on the other, a chained handcuff. Hassan Saeed was walking close to him. They have entered the first floor of the office where the contractor was alone at the time.

The policeman enquired about the original documents of the building contract and job orders between Hassan Saeed and the contractor which the contractor refused to disclose.

Scene 2.
The contractor was threatened with dire consequences unless he withdrew the lawsuit. The contractor was not willing to yield to such illegal and unjust demand, which amounted to extortion.

There upon, the contractor was subjected to the most inhuman treatment with painful physical injuries and otherwise.

They wanted to grab and destroy the related documents of the contract from him by force because an ‘Interim Order’ of the Court was against Hassan Saeed. In this attempt, the entire office was ransacked, drawers opened, files thrown.

The telephone connection in the office was snapped. The policeman in civil dress beat the contractor harshly with a chained handcuff; the chain was rounded on victim’s neck and pulled around. He paid no heed to the humble requests of the victim.

The policeman forcefully broke open the office locker with the heavy iron rod in his hand. At this juncture, some of the cash, worth above AED 3,50,000 which was kept for the distribution of wages for employees was found by them.

Scene 3.
So much of money! The policeman’s eyes bulged out in wonder. He looked at his Emirati friend as if he never expected there’s such a large amount of money. The currency blurred their eyes. All in a hurry, both of them grabbed the bunches of currency, and hurriedly stuffed into their pockets. In their hurry and perplexity, part of the currencies spilled over the floor of the cabin.

In the meantime, the contractor’s younger brother arrived at the office with lunch. As he arrived the contractor asked him “to close the door and call the police”. The policeman in plain clothes managed to get out of the office with the stolen money and bundled documents.

The Emirati too tried to escape from the office of the contractor, with his hands and pockets full, protruding with the stolen money and valuables; however, he was unable to leave.

Scene 4.
The Policeman in civil dress was standing outside the office which remained closed. A crowd had gathered around the office. He was holding an iron rod of one meter length in his hand with which he was hitting the door of the office and warning any one from coming near the office and was shouting Indian, Pakistani, Bangali all are thieves and procurers.

At this point of time police patrol team arrived at the spot. They were, in fact, allies of the intruders. This batch of policemen who came responding to the alert of the contractor, immediately hit the contractor and his brother. Their faces had reflections of triumph and cruelty. They were like ferocious animals, beaten both the victims brutally, almost near to death. Then they handcuffed them behind their backs and dragged them out of the office, on through the street, and kicked them into the police car. All these brutal torture and humiliations were happening in front of a large crowd.

The frightening deadly torture continued with shocking brutality throughout the journey as well as in a detention centre and subsequently getting admitted as an unconscious victim to the hospital emergency, Abu Dhabi.

Scene 5. (UAE Torture)
Here is a narration of the haunting memories and the cruel and inhuman torture suffered by the victim, in his own painful words:

“There were four persons present (in plain clothes) when they tortured me in an underground detention centre. I was forced to lay down on the floor by them. My face was close to the floor and my hands still cuffed behind my back. They took out their Arabic turban and rolled it on my entire head and left me to suffocate; then started hitting and kicking on my head with their legs. And then they tried to pull-out my injured finger nails with a plier type nail clipper. Due to this cruel and painful torture, my finger nail were entirely torn apart”. (Full Text: UAE Police Torture’)

[The above narration is not exhaustive but only a pointer to untold miseries, losses, sufferings; the haunting memories of the ‘cruel and inhuman torture’ and social humiliation suffered by the victim; the ‘Judgment Creditor’. He had to undergo extremes of inhuman and deadly tortures from Abu Dhabi Police which no human being could withstand. However, he was spared from death. For more details and updates, please visit the website URL: www.JudgmentCreditor.com/]

Judgments & Orders:

The Legal Court of First Instance of Abu Dhabi :-
It took six months thereafter, for the contractor to have his first appearance in Court. The ‘Duty and Responsibility’ of the authority to protect a Judgment Creditor against the threats of violence was left unattended. The victim was framed a false case, alleging “Using force against Government employee and assault”.

The Legal Court of First Instance of Abu Dhabi found that the victim was innocent, the case (NO. 152/1996) was wholly false, baseless and that it was fabricated by both the plaintiffs, Hassan Saeed Hassan and Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Khadir, the policeman. The Court found that, the Prosecutor was guilty of proceeding against the contractor, who in fact, was a victim of police brutality. The Court acquitted the contractor [and his brother as well] of all the charges levelled against them and directed the authorities to investigate the violent crimes committed by the Policemen and the Landlord such as trespassing, physical aggression, looting etc. (Judgment First Instance 152/1996 dated 10/4/1996)

[The 'Judgment of the Legal Court of First Instance' has never been executed or investigated; instead the authorities were trying their best to hide the shameful act of the police. The prosecution taken-up the case to the Apex Court, the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE].

The Apex Court of Abu Dhabi:-
The case came up before the Apex Court, comprising the three-judge panel. The prosecution found to be grossly negligent and blamed for its criminal involvement in the case. The contractor was granted bail on the filing of the appeal. However, despite the bail and sureties he was not released from the prison.

During the next hearing, the Policeman dropped his claim from his complaint with a declaration attested by the Notary Public. The landlord, Hassan Saeed followed the suit and admitted his guiltiness. The judges threw out all those papers and had cautioned them of the serious nature of their crime which calls for long term of imprisonment apart from financial penalties and confiscations.

“The Court praised the properness of the behaviour and courage of the victim and concluded that the victim is innocent; rather ‘a martyr. The appellate review highlighted the culpability of the policeman and emphasized the notoriety of his actions and violations of person’s rights. “It further reiterated the condemnation of prosecutor”. The Court ordered immediate release of the victim, ‘restoration’ of victim’s dignity, respect and reminded about the roles and responsibilities of authority towards the victim for reparation for the losses he suffered while pronouncing a ‘Landmark Judgment’.

An excerpt from the Judgment reads as follows:-
“Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom….” (Apex Court Judgment 188/1996 dated 19/5/1996).

“THE ‘LANDMARK JUDGMENTS’ IN THE HISTORY OF UAE”Having due respect, inspiring loyalty and commitment to Law, the Judiciary of Abu Dhabi, listened to, conducted and decided upon the case precisely in tune with the various provisions prevailing in that country. Download the Judgment:-(PDF Format)

“FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION” - A DIRTY GAME OF THE ‘WILFUL DEFAULTERS’, THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF ABU DHABI, UAE!Instead of honouring the Judgments of the Legal Court of First Instance and the Apex Court, the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi, and restoring the dignity and respect of the victim as directed therein, ‘the UAE Administration’ chose to deport the victim with “Fraudulent Misrepresentation” of truthful facts, by repeating the same false charge, that a tricky policeman had framed against the Judgment Creditor to blackmail him, (which had been dismissed later on finding it to be false by both the Courts of that country). By quoting the very same false charge to deport the Judgment Creditor (who was also a victim of police brutality), the Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi has not only tarnished the image of UAE in indelible ink; but also made a mockery of the entire Judiciary of that country.

THE SCENARIO BACK HOME, IN INDIA
And back in India, what action was taken by the Government of India?
“Nothing, except a cruel and deliberate betrayal over the past two decades”.

In India, the ‘Legal fight for Justice’ took in very many proceedings before the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi. Unfortunately, India has not made any diplomatic efforts or given any respect to the orders of Delhi High Court in 1997 and 2007.

The concurring Judgments against Abu Dhabi police from the Highest Court of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and the ‘Concealment of the Judicial Decisions’ by the administration of that country, and to deport the ‘Judgment Creditor’, were un-challengeable F.I.R. against the Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi, who was duty-bound to compensate the victim in every respect for his physical and mental injury, illegal imprisonment and ill-health due to the near-to-death torture by policemen. In contrast there to, the illegal deportation resulted in the absolute loss of his various ‘Business Establishments’, and he was forced to live a lost life for all the years that followed.

AWAIT RELEASE!“25 Smart Reasons to take the ‘UAE Judgment Execution Case’ to the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
The Government of India is duty bound to take all necessary measures to enforce the Judgments passed by the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi, including approaching the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for the settlement of this unique and the most barbaric action perpetrated by the head of a civilized nation, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, that caused ‘Multi-billion Dollars’ worth of damages to the Judgment Creditor’s business establishments. The ‘Laws Governing the International Community’ do require compliance by the Executive Government, in full measure, with the verdict of the Judiciary; this requirement of law was breached by the UAE Government. (‘Publications’)

Thanks Message to the ‘CNN’ for Publishing a Special Feature
Thank you so much for providing us a venue to publish this ‘Special Feature’.

Our Sponsors* Support the Judgment Creditor: Support Justice; Invest in Justice!
[Outright sale of a Judgment is not envisioned. Funds are proposed to be raised by distribution of shares]. Full Text: “Judgment Enforcement Campaigns Worldwide”

Scores of activists in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have been harassed, arrested and in some cases tortured in custody according to a new report by Amnesty International that sheds light on the repressive tactics widely used by the government to silence its critics.

“There is no freedom here”: Silencing dissent in the UAE lifts the lid on the climate of fear that has taken hold in the country since 2011, with the authorities going to extreme lengths to stamp out any sign of dissent, criticism or calls for reform in the wake of the mass popular uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa.

“Beneath the façade of glitz and glamour, a far more sinister side to the UAE has emerged showing the UAE as a deeply repressive state where activists critical of the government can be tossed in jail merely for posting a tweet,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa Programme.

Those targeted include lawyers, university professors, students and civil society activists, some of whom are linked to the Reform and Social Guidance Association (al-Islah), a peaceful grassroots organization that the government claims has links to Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood. The clampdown has also targeted their family members.

The report, published ahead of the Formula One Grand Prix in Abu Dhabi this weekend, exposes the huge gulf between the public image the UAE tries to project of a dynamic, modern and burgeoning economic power, home to luxury hotels, skyscrapers and designer shopping malls; and the darker reality of activists routinely persecuted and subjected to enforced disappearance, torture and other ill-treatment.

“Millions of spectators from across the world are expected to tune in to watch the Abu Dhabi Formula One Grand Prix this weekend – yet most of them will have little clue about the ugly reality of life for activists in the UAE,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui.

“The scale of the crackdown has been chilling and the truth is that the UAE’s dreadful treatment of activists critical of the government, and their families, has gone largely ignored by the world. It is time for the UAE’s international allies to stop turning a blind eye to the rampant abuses by the authorities and to place human rights firmly before business interests.”

The clampdown on dissent was sparked by a petition from a group of 133 people addressed to the authorities in March 2011, calling for political reform and for the right to vote and elect a parliament.

More than 100 peaceful activists and government critics have been prosecuted or jailed for politically motivated national security or cybercrimes offences since then. More than 60 of them continue to languish in prison, serving sentences of up to 14 years.

Amnesty International’s report details how these men and their families have been intimidated or arbitrarily arrested and imprisoned by the authorities.

Among them is prisoner of conscience Dr Mohammed al-Roken, a prominent human rights lawyer who had for years been a target of government harassment because of his criticism of the UAE’s human rights record and his advocacy for democratic reforms. He is serving a 10-year prison sentence following a deeply flawed mass trial of 94 activists before the State Security Chamber of the Federal Supreme Court – widely known as the “UAE 94” trial.

In another emblematic case, 25-year-old activist Osama al-Najjar was arrested in March 2014 after he expressed, in comments posted on Twitter, concern over the ill-treatment of his father, Hussain Ali al-Najjar al-Hammadi, and other political prisoners held at al-Razeen Prison in Abu Dhabi. After his arrest, he was held in solitary confinement where he says he was punched and beaten repeatedly all over his face and body and threatened with electric shocks.

His father is serving a total of 11 years’ imprisonment after being convicted under vaguely-worded national security charges following two unfair mass trials. He was held in solitary confinement for eight months in conditions amounting to enforced disappearance following his arrest in 2012.

“The UAE authorities must halt all such arbitrary arrests and detentions, as well as enforced disappearances. Both father and son in this case are prisoners of conscience who should be immediately and unconditionally released, alongside all others detained purely for peacefully exercising their rights to freedom of expression and association,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui.

Amnesty International is calling on the UAE authorities to urgently overhaul laws that criminalize the peaceful exercise of the rights to freedom of expression and association, including the cybercrimes law and a repressive new anti-terrorism law passed in August 2014.

Some of those jailed said they were tortured and ill-treated, describing how interrogators had pulled out their fingernails; beaten them severely and suspended them upside down for long periods; torn hair from their beards and chests; and threatened them with electric shock torture, rape and death.

Amnesty International is urging the UAE authorities to publicly condemn torture and take effective measures to prohibit and prevent all forms of torture and other ill-treatment, as well as to independently and impartially investigate all allegations of torture and hold perpetrators to account.

“The UAE cannot proclaim to be a progressive nation or hold its head high as a member of the UN Human Rights Council, and a business partner on an international stage while it is locking up critics merely for peacefully speaking their views,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui.

The “UAE 94” trial was marred by irregularities and its proceedings were deeply flawed and unfair. The justice system in the UAE is neither independent nor impartial, with courts often appearing to do little more than rubber stamp the decisions of the UAE executive. Defendants are often denied access to lawyers and the right to appeal their verdict. In many cases proceedings have relied on forced “confessions” to convict defendants, in contravention of international human rights law.

Harassment and intimidation tactics employed by the authorities also include revoking the nationality of activists and punishing their families by appearing to block their access to career or educational opportunities.

The UAE authorities responded to the concerns raised by Amnesty International in this report to say that the promotion of human rights is an “ongoing process”.

“What we need to see now from the UAE authorities are swift and concrete steps that prove the government is truly committed to protecting human rights, not more spin designed to gloss over ruthless repression at home,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui.

So much of money! The policeman’s eyes bulged out in wonder. He looked at his Emirati friend as if he never expected there will be such a large amount of money. The currency blurred their eyes. All in a