Each of these departures by themselves is no great loss (except Adams) and not cause for concern. You take them as a whole, however, and it is a very great concern and you either have to question how Dixon is recruiting or what he's doing once these guys are on campus.

Each of these departures by themselves is no great loss (except Adams) and not cause for concern. You take them as a whole, however, and it is a very great concern and you either have to question how Dixon is recruiting or what he's doing once these guys are on campus.

Double dribble...thats a paddlin'travel....thats a paddlin'dont play within the team defense....thats a paddlin'

Each of these departures by themselves is no great loss (except Adams) and not cause for concern. You take them as a whole, however, and it is a very great concern and you either have to question how Dixon is recruiting or what he's doing once these guys are on campus.

Each of these departures by themselves is no great loss (except Adams) and not cause for concern. You take them as a whole, however, and it is a very great concern and you either have to question how Dixon is recruiting or what he's doing once these guys are on campus.

Each of these departures by themselves is no great loss (except Adams) and not cause for concern. You take them as a whole, however, and it is a very great concern and you either have to question how Dixon is recruiting or what he's doing once these guys are on campus.

Agree with this.

Yea, a lot of the UCLA explanations for firing Howland stated the shocking number of transfers, not just the disappointments.... Seems like Dixon is establishing that too. We've all heard how hard Dixon's practices are before, maybe that leads to transfers