This is what the HUSsies are all about – clinging to their “right” to ride the carousel, or a carousel-lite version of “only” 5 dicks prior to “settling”. This is why SW gets so worked up and angry at the androsphere – her Beta didn’t mind that she’d ridden the carousel-lite, so how dare younger Betas become choosy, just because they weren’t among the 5 (or 10, or 15…) ponies ridden. How dare men decide they get to be gatekeepers of commitment! The idea!

In aviation there is the concept of being “behind the curve”, i.e. trying to fly the aircraft as it was a few minutes or seconds ago vs. how it is. Falling behind the curve can lead to a stall-spin, at low altitude that breaks your airplane. The 2nd stage feminists are way behind the curve, because they never conceived that men would react to their actions, ever, and can’t come to grips with the fact that we have reacted, and we continue to react.

Like this:

Related

21 Responses to “What Gets Susan Walsh Angry At The Androsphere”

Walsh is emotionally invested in the idea that she is helping rebuild the traditional family.

Guys like us are logically and persuasively arguing that the concept of modern woman as devoted wife and mother is basically laughable, and as a result, men throughout society are forswearing marriage. We are preaching an inconvenient truth, so we have to be shunned.

There is another anti-feminist traditionalist female blogger and writer, similar to Walsh, who I’ve corresponded with. She at least admits that women have jumped the shark on marriage and she doesn’t blame men like us for our thoughts on the matter.

Well, to be fair, I have had a few college women tell me their number is around 30 (and they’re not done yet). And I wouldn’t say they necessarily have self-esteem issues, but they do take pride in being a bit outrageous and having a good time.

By the way, what is this fascination with the number? I never kept track of this — notches on a bedpost. Women focus on this a lot, and I’m not really sure why. I’ve never been asked for my number, and I don’t really know what it is. For better or worse, I think some of them went pretty much unnoticed, haha. Today’s generation is, however, keenly aware of this and keeps track.

I think the real issue here is the question of promiscuity. Is it wrong? What does it mean when a woman is promiscuous, and may even consider it part of her identity? If men are instinctively repelled by a promiscuous sexual history, should that influence the behavioral decisions of women, when we know that’s the patriarchal sexual standard rearing its ugly head?

“I recently commented that some of the MRA blogs are every bit as demented as Pandagon or feministing. It’s the exact same mindset, with crazy shaming of anyone with a question, much less a dissenting view. The tone is mocking and self-congratulatory.”

It’s the same old, same old – the promotion of the false equivalence between MRAs and feminists while falsely claiming to be in the “sane middle”.

She actually has the cheek to claim that she promotes the fight against misandry:

“You’re just part of a big MRA circle jerk that knows how to win enemies and alienate people. The more you come around, the worse you look, and the more misandry you’re likely to breed. For the sake of your movement, crawl back to obscurity. It’s impossible to fight misandry with guys like you getting in the way.”

It’s impossible not to notice that female bloggers who want to leech off the growing popularity of the Manosphere are very manipulative and shrewd. They always sing the same tune.

“I want to support men’s rights. I really do! The injustice men have to suffer is deeply worrisome. But I just can’t bring myself to do so as long as some creepy, bitter dudes have a voice among MRAs. First they need to change, otherwise they’ll lose a supporter in me and other women!”

The same old declarations of false allegiance. Needless to say, it’s all bunk. They never supported the concept of men’s rights. They’re simply looking for attention. They engage the Manosphere because they know it’s gaining traction.

Both Men’s Rights and the Liberty movement are becoming trendy right now. Therefore, women are jumping onto the bandwagon. And in both cases, we are seeing a huge push by these same women to monopolize the agenda of the movements.

This is true. It’s no surprise that they are against anything that can’t be made to work for women like MGTOW. There was a recent fight at the LadyMRAs reddit as soon as MGTOW became a topic. All the “lady MRAs” expressed extreme hatred for MGTOW proving that they wanted to make the MRM all about women.

But on the bright side, the conservative and libertarian blogosphere is becoming more critical of Feminism all the time. I daresay it is becoming trendy to criticize Feminism. Which is spectacular, because it will get the female hive mind engaged.

I think “behind the curve” means that your airspeed is so low you cannot maintain altitude by lifting the nose even with 100% of engine power. The “curve” refers to the graph of airspeed/power/max climb. Only way out is to dive for a bit and regain speed.