Turbulent Times at Maryvale

Like many it seems, I was shocked and saddened to hear the news that Dr. Petroc Willey, acting director of Maryvale since the departure due to ill health of Mgr. Paul Watson, has tendered his resignation.

There is a lot of publicity and talk surrounding the news, it has even been picked up by the Telegraph. Damian Thompson voices the concerns of many people when he asks "What's going on?"

What is it that makes someone so talented, someone who has dedicated so much of his life to Catholic education, resign from his position?

Maryvale is very dear to my heart. It is an extraordinary place which provides educational opportunities, through its distance learning programme, that allows for a level of education many would otherwise struggle to attain. It is also thoroughly Catholic, joyfully spreading the faith in a faithful, intellectual way.

Now you would think this is an excellent thing that should be embraced and encouraged, and you would be right. What is shocking, and has shocked me since I studied there, is the number of clergy who hate Maryvale—I use the word not lightly!

There are many who do not want educated laity, who loathe orthodoxy, who do not want the truths of the faith disseminated. If you are puzzled reading this, join the club. Since I started studying at Maryvale I have constantly wondered what do these people actually want? Since completing my degree I have worked with some of them. What they seem to want is kudos and power. They want to not be challenged. They want relativism, the destruction of everything Catholic, the increasingly impotence of our schools to evangelise.

Now, I don't want to give the impression that I have any kind of inside track here, I don't, and even if I did, I would not want to spread rumours or gossip. But I do know that Maryvale constantly faces an uphill struggle and that it needs our support, prayers and money to survive. The best way to support it financially is to make sure it is known about, and to make sure there are people going on courses there.

The lack of an announcement about a replacement to Mgr. Paul has left me feeling uneasy over the last few months, just as the lack of forthcoming bishops to fill our vacant sees makes me nervous. Do we lack suitable candidates? Or is there a conflict of vision that is resulting in internal conflict? I know from business that lack of leadership and vision is only damaging.

Yesterday, this letter was sent from the new Acting Director to all students of Maryvale:

Dear Students,

Yesterday Dr Petroc Willey, the Acting Director of the Maryvale Institute, wrote to the students of the Institute to say that for personal reasons he would soon be leaving Maryvale, and that a number of other staff have made a similar decision. TheTrustees of Maryvale have issued a statement thanking Petroc for the contribution that he has made to its work over many years, and respecting the personal reasons that have led to his resignation.

The Trustees have asked me to take over the position of Acting Director of Maryvale. Since September I have been a member of the full-time staff of Maryvale, with particular responsibility for parish and family catechesis, and I have met a number of you who have attended the residential weekends and study days over that time.

I realise that many of you will be surprised and saddened by Petroc’s decision to resign from Maryvale, and I am writing to you now to reassure you that the future of the Institute remains secure and that the continuation of your studies will not be jeopardised by his departure, or that of any other member of staff. All future study days, weekends and others events will take place as already arranged. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact either myself or your Course Director.

With best wishes and blessings for your studies, and I look forward to meeting you in due course.

Yours sincerely,Fr. Edward Clare

From this it would seem that there has been some difference of opinion between the diocese and the staff. This is human, but I can't say it doesn't disappoint me that we can't all work on the same side and find a better way of coping with our differences, whilst being respectful to all sides. Especially if we are part of one mission: to make God known and loved. As the Institute motto states; Audite insulae—hear o islands. Christ Himself tells us that a house divided against itself cannot stand (Mt 12:25). Scandal is bad, and this is causing scandal, because as much as we try to smooth it over, there has been a fundamental breakdown in management.

It would be nice to hear from Archbishop Longley, or someone from his office sooner rather than later. What needs to be clarified is the status of the Institute and the security of student's endeavours and the institute's commitments to students (which I have been told explicitly will be met). What the diocesan vision for the Institute is and why this breakdown was unavoidable. This is not complicated or difficult, it just needs doing.

As a businessman, I would consider that the situation would be that the Institute is largely funded by the diocese. The Charity Commission website demonstrates that their expenditure currents outstrips income considerably. OFTSED presents a less than favourable ITE report from 2011. It's not hard to draw conclusions.

Put simply from a business perspective, if the Institute is a drain on diocesan funds, should the diocese not have the main say on what the asset does? Should we be surprised if the arch-diocese has stepped in and given Maryvale a more local mission?

This is the important thing to stress: it is business as usual at Maryvale; all commitments will be met. It is a busy time of the year there, preparing for graduation.

If you want an institute of theological excellence, you need to support it. You need to support it in your parishes and make the reach and capability known.

Popular posts from this blog

A few of days ago I posted about a new book called The Dictator Pope which has been really causing a stir as it claims to be the inside story of the most tyrannical and unprincipled papacy of modern times.

Now this was first posted on One Peter Five, which I love, but some criticise because it is a site critical of progressive catholic attitudes and modernism. Anyway some people these days dismiss certain sources because they tend to contradict their own agenda. I don't, as I have said here numerous times before, we are all parts of the body of Christ and that body has many parts (cf. 1 Cor 12). If I agree with everything someone says, I'm probably reading my own blog. We all get it wrong sometimes.

Anyway, I was concerned initially that this would be seen as a diatribe against the pope with an agenda. This would make the contents easier to dismiss.
Almost read “The Dictator Pope”, of course it is all libelous gossip, the Church is not a dictatorship, is it?
— raymond blake (…

Vaticanista Marco Tossati reports that even the faithless men who put Pope Francis on the throne of St. Peter are losing patience with his laissez faire, "make a mess" approach to being pope.

In his article on the AAS inclusion of the Buenos Aires directives, he remarks:
A cardinal of great renown, a former diplomat, who has served an impressive career at the head of Congregations and in high offices in the Secretariat of State, is said to have reproved the Pope for his actions [as Pope], saying to him essentially, “We elected you to make reforms, not to smash everything.” News of this conversation — if it can be called a conversation — has spread through the Vatican, because it took place at a high decibel level, which carried through the fragile barrier of the doors and walls. The cardinal in question was one of those who supported the candidacy of Jorge Mario Bergoglio in the conclave of 2013.Gloria.tv reports that this is most likely the Argentinian Leonardo Sandri, the…

Any human being with any iota of common sense would be appalled at the treatment of Nigel and Sally Rowe the parents of a six-year-old boy who have removed him from his primary school after another child in his class began wearing a dress to school.

The couple said under the school's bullying policy their son faced being disciplined for misidentifying the gender of the six-year-old pupil.
They've been subjected to this sort of madness on television:
"What gender are your children?"

LGBT rights campaigner Jane Fae challenges parents who withdrew 6yo son from school with transgender child pic.twitter.com/pTSEEupfUz
— Victoria Derbyshire (@VictoriaLIVE) September 11, 2017
And also from the likes of Stella Creasy and Anna Soubry. It is incredible to see MPs detracting and abusing an ordinary couple who just want the best for their child.
So sad to hear parent teach their child to hate like this- hope that both kids in get s…