Do you go and get a slave job like others? I don't agree with the idea of doing anything for money, including self employment and self promotion, I think people doing things out of true desire and for the benefit of others is the way to go,

But since that the world is not as such, should one compromise to get by or is there a way out?

That is up to the individual on whether or not they should do this or that, or compromise with whatever your views are. It depends on if you have any standards for how you'd like to live among a bunch of other things, but you could get by without getting a job. There are many options like squatting, becoming a hermit in the woods, sleeping on the streets, collecting welfare...etc, and stealing/taking or dumpster diving for stuff like food, water, clothing, and other things. It's up to you in some ways. If your family is on the wealthier side of things it makes it infinitely easier on you employment wise. You can't really live full blown anarchically in today's world imo. Yep yep

to your secondary questions about compromising or a way out....i'd say unless you have tons of emotional, mental, and physical strength, along with lots of skills and anarchic relationships, and a total lack of fear, then yes, you will probably find yourself compromising....

but at the same time, you do have a way out - every moment that you do have the cunning and strength and imagination and relationships and skills to do so.

i live trying to increase the frequency, duration, and variety of those moments, and continuing to compromise less. for me that means acquiring more skills, keeping my mind and body as flexible as possible, finding people who want to live more anarchically, keeping aware of and understanding how the state and money systems operate, nurturing my creativity, and consuming cannabis.....among other things.... :)

i've also found that getting to know more deeply what i want to both give and receive has helped. i think the money system (the buying and selling of everything and everyone) led me to not really know what i want to receive or give to others - i thought i needed and wanted things and "services" that i now realize i don't, and what i had to give always came back to how i could make money, rather than what i really felt a desire to give.

to directly answer the part about a job...i had one for about 20 years (from age 15 to 35), but at this moment i haven't worked at a job for about 20 years (now age 56).

2 Answers

+2 votes

Hi anon,

As dot commented, there are a lot of answers on this site relating to anarchists navigating living in a hostile world, and in particular, navigating capitalism, jobby-jobs, etc.

Personally, I don't think there is one right way to navigate. Some of us make do on disability compensation, some of us turn to criminality (which is so expansive it includes everything from scams, to sex work, to straight up robbery). Myself, I have and have always had a job, and I've come to grips with the fact that there will never be some point where I transcend the world I live in and exist exactly as I'd like to exist. If I did that, I wouldn't be on the web right now, I'd be swimming butt naked with my best-ever dog friend in a lake or stream, but that isn't going to happen.

I work for a non-profit, doing something that commonly gets the response, "Oh, it is so good you do that work. So important..." The truth is, I work there because I can tolerate what I do and get compensated okay and not feel shitty about myself at the end of the day, not because it is good or aligns with my beliefs. If I could get paid as much to deliver pizza, I would totally change careers.

I can't tell you how to navigate, and I don't elaborate on my situation because I think it is somehow better than the other options, but because it is the one I can elaborate on. I am curious what your thoughts are on navigating this terrible world?

dot, I didn't reject anything. I gave an opinion that your opinion is basically the premise of The Book Who Sat By The Door. Projects end and/or have an end. I do fail to see one joining say the military helping a project, except screwing someone.

?: i don't know. what if joining the military was the only way someone could learn how to utilize various weapons or other tools - or obtain intelligence etc - that they found necessary for their life and autonomy?

we all do what we have to do to survive in this shithole. condemning what others do without full understanding of their context is just playing by the rulebook of the rulers.

if i had my current perspective 30 years ago when i was doing computer work for powerful institutions, i could have obtained knowledge that might have been very useful to me in combating those very institutions. would you have disassociated from me because of the job i chose, regardless of my underlying objectives?

yes, funky. i really haven't though much about this idea (working within institutions to either undermine them, or learn more about them for my own survival, etc).....but you and dot mentioning it got me thinking a bit. i think i probably did some of this without realizing it over the years, but unfortunately, for a few years i tried to "change things" within those places i worked....what a waste of my energy!

i'd like to hear more about peoples' experiences doing this sort of thing....or at least some ideas about what they could do.

ba@, so many ways -- i had friends who worked for restaurants and brought food home to share, same with grocery stores. when i did social work, i learned how to help people negotiate the bureaucracy around state assistance (unfortunately the rules have changed since then, as they do). i also learned first aid and emergency response skills that would come in hand if i ever left the house ;) . i've heard a friend talk about two native anti-civ people who joined the military to learn what boot camp could teach them, including shooting. and of course medical and legal professional friends, who are usually the hubs of a circle of people they're helping for cheap/free.

i'm sure there are more creative ways to engage this idea, but those are real world examples off the top of my head.

It seems to me that to change a bad system it can be done by sometimes not being a part of it and sometimes by using the system itself, this can change from one person to another, so I agree with the idea of people having different best ways to deal with the system.

As for myself, my parents happen to be doing good financially, I live in the family house since my parents live abroad and take care of it, which means I don't worry about rent, they do understand and somewhat agree with my view on work, so they do help me financially, at the same time I try to do volunteer work, this way it's like I am getting paid for providing a service but not directly for the service itself, still this is not ideal, so I am trying to get to a point where I am making enough money on my own while at the same time continue with volunteer work, also charge less or nothing from people who can't afford what I can provide

Other than that there are some volunteer jobs abroad that provide accommodation and food and no money which seems better than most other options if one can afford plane tickets and have some extra cash

If you can get by and engage in products by leveraging whatever familial privilege you have, I think that is totally legit. I do think it important to be cognizant of how inherited privileges might allow you some opportunities that other anarchists don't have.

If family wealth allows you to invest more time in projects you find worthwhile, that is (mostly) great. As someone who has worked at anarchist (ex. Food Not Bombs) and not anarchist (501c3) non-profits, I would just warn against this thing that can happen where sometimes folks other themselves as do-gooding providers of help as opposed to the poor down-trodden they are helping. Not saying that you are doing that, but I have seen that too many times (and have certainly done it myself in the past). I think this is potentially a very real pitfall of travelling abroad to do 'service work' type jobs.

i try to do as much as i can in life as a "volunteer"....in the sense that no one forces me to do it, and also that i do it without money. so this can apply to anything, not just to what the hierarchical institutions call "volunteering". when i can see from this perspective, i find more creative ways of living, more moments of anarchy.....this includes feeling free to receive the "volunteer" efforts of others toward me.

and i don't mean to imply that i've even come close to figure out how to live totally without money, or that i even have the fortitude to do all the things i have figured out....so whatever job you can work at to get by in this bullshit i can understand...i don't know anyone who doesn't have that dilemma. but i can tell you that by putting my mind more toward living this way, i have reduced my dependency on money quite a bit. at one point in my life, i probably had some involvement with money on a daily basis (at times when i had a small business, i dealt with it hourly on many days)....and now i probably only use money 2 or 3 days a month on average.

(edited to add: when i said "without money" (in the first sentence when describing volunteering) i meant without buying or selling (stuff or skills) for money.....i don't mean just giving or receiving money to/from another person for no reason other than both of us want to do it).

I would also warn against the sense of duty. Not to say you shouldn't do shit, but there is a way where Doing a Good Thing becomes the reason, as opposed to actions being based on mutual aid or feelings of solidarity.

What feels like a lifetime ago, I did a Food Not Bombs project that was mostly focused on getting fresh produce to folks in what was a bit of a food desert. At some point, it was clear that the folks who got food from me and others expected that we would bring food to them, and at the same time I felt like I couldn't quit, because what would happen?

That's the pitfall of duty. I quit, but I don't regret the times and relationships I had up to that moment one bit.

ingrate, your comment about fnb brought to mind a time when i went to one in seattle a few years back, not long after i first heard of its existence.

i felt pumped to go, but what i saw when i arrived looked much more like a charity than i had anticipated. the people serving the food and those receiving it appeared to me to play the roles like they do in other charities - the givers who had no problem getting their own food, and the receivers of the charity who appeared to have a hard time getting it. i had imagined the lack of such a clear distinction, and thought i'd see much more of a mutual aid situation.

aside from what you mentioned about people expecting charity, i also have found that people who don't feel hopeless (and who have plenty of money to buy stuff) often have a difficulty in receiving stuff for free, i think for fear of feeling like they are the recipients of charity, a bum, etc

i think all this relates to what the concepts of money and authority do to the mind.....creating these binary distinctions that you don't want to end up on the "wrong" side of....rather than allowing yourself to both give and receive.

not sure if it is around online (eg, the anarchist library), but there was an article -rather controversial to some - in the old green anarchy journal that critiqued fnb from an anarchist perspective. it was targeted specifically at the fnb in eugene back in the early/mid 2000s. you might find it interesting, ba@. i'll see if i can find it.

not to belabor fnb, but it also it needs to be clear that fnb in different cities can be dramatically different in how they organize, cook (or obtain food otherwise), and distribute. back when i still periodically participated in demos/protests in san francisco (going back quite a ways), fnb often provided food, and it was usually much like a party, to me; no sense of "us and them" between serving and eating. plus they usually were able to get good prepared foods (burritos, sandwiches, muffins, etc) from various shops around town. the fnb in eugene, in contrast, made the worst, lowest-common-denominator, bland ass food i ever tasted. nutritious, usually vegan, but astoundingly (and unnecessarily) boring. especially given that they got weekly food donations from the best health food store in town. in eugene around that time, it was very much like a charity. organized by so-called anarchists.

the party atmosphere was more a factor of the street demo than fnb per se. i just happened to wind up near where fnb had set up, at the same time as many others with musical instruments, and we (i always had my small drum with me) just played and danced and ate and drank. almost like an rts (reclaim the streets) thing.

this is an aside, but maybe remotely relevant. there have been a few times, when i was driving and stuck in traffic with my funky music playing, that i would blast the music and get out of the car and just start dancing there in traffic next to my car. mostly, people looked at me like i was crazy; i'd see a few smiles. but once, a woman and her son got out of the car in front of me and danced with me! it was fucking awesome spontaneity, a flash of anarchic joy in the midst of the shithole drudgery of urban auto life.

there's this new title called joyful militancy, which is ok (meh), but i was thinking so hard when i read it that there is no actual joy in it. this story from you F@ would be a much better direction for me for such a book. :)