I don't dislike it much but vegas was more quantity over quality :D
iv spent well over 600 hours no doubt, lol us fallout fans are gud fans 2
my current tunnel snake gang has over 100 hours on its save and the game time has passed into the next year so im pretty chilled, gud luck to u m8, c u around :) Tommygunner32 10:55, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome, however, the thing with Fallout 3 is that it just seemed to drop a lot of aspects from the original and make up it's own. At the end of Fallout the NCR is created and they go on to civilise California. However, over in Washington (Fallout 3), which is set 200 years after the Great War, there seems to hardly be any attempt at rebuilding, not to mention that after 200 years there should be a lot less radiation. I find it hard to believe that a small group of people managed to strip down an airfield and turn it into a small town (Megaton), but they can't even build a simple well to get water underground.

Fallout: New Vegas appealed much more to the people who enjoyed the originals because it didn't stray so far from the established storyline and general tone. Also Fallout: NV is not steampunk, it's retrofuturistic just like how the Fallout series has been since the start.

Oh and is the "FUCK OBSIDIAN" statement really necessary? Obsidian made a lot of people happy when they mnade New Vegas.