you are right broo……… there should be change…….. Akki is best….no one other is near of him…… Fans pe khumar of Akshay Kumar. please change the postion of Akki ……… he is the best in Bollywood. he is on No. 1 Postiotion.

Where is Abhishek, Siddharth, ritiesh Deshmukh n vivek Oberoi. Abhishek has 200crore club film Dhoom 3 and 100 cr bol bhachan where Dhoom 3 is 3rd highest overseas n happy new year 200 cr club giving him a total of 550 even greater than akshay ritiesh has grand masti n ek villain in 100 cr club giving him 200 point vivek has krrish 3 in 200 cr club and grand masti 100 cr giving him 300 point n Siddharth Malhotra has ek villian giving him 100 point Sharman Joshi and madhavan too have 3 idiots as 200 cr club where madhavan has tanu weds Manu return in 100 cr. Including overseas of 3 idiot Sharman has 250 points and madhavam 350 n again Aditya Roy Kapoor yjhd in 100 cr club so i think they too have played a lead in their film i think they should also be included

I am guaranteeing you, that if content of Sultan will be good & if audience accepts it just like as Bajrangi Bhaijaan no one can stop Mega-Superstar SALMAN KHAN from opening 400 crore club in India & 1000 crore club Worldwide.

Stupid Idea, Look the quality and the content of the film. Not the double meaning words. Stop this nonsense matching. If you have to judge the actor like this then what about Raj kapoor, Dalip Kumar, Sanjiv Kumar, Raj kumar, Balraj Sahni, they are all evergreen actor AND the modern actor will never stands in front of them.

Akshay Khiladi Kumar is the best and the only superstar who can perform any role. A superstar, the busiest actor and highest fee and highest profit charger of Bollywood. ☺☺ In a word, the King of Bollywood.

Comment:@nanji …. I agree Akshay sir is a gr8 actor no doubt…. where as you are talking about holiday release…. so what about Once Upon a time in Mumbai doobar.????. had it made a business of 500+???????

I feel this is among the most vital info for me. And i am glad studying your article. However wanna statement on some basic issues, The website taste is ideal, the articles is really excellent : D. Just right activity, cheers

Points should be calculated on profit percentage of a film not 100 200 300crores its stupid calcualtions star rankings should be on stars profits per film ———————————————-not crores, its not healthy sensible. ==================

Why do you think the actor only in the box office? Then actor award – the Order of the country, the Filmfare Film Awards, the country’s equivalent to the American Oscars – rubbish, do not mean anything? This patriotic? You do not respect the prize of their own country? … Should provide points for the the awards ..

There is only one King of Bollywood. Aamir Khan. Aamir Sir, is the roaring Lion of the box office, the only reason Salman is because he does more films. Aamir’s films are the best. They have light comedic sequences, great plots/story lines and a social message which is clearly portrayed. Unlike Salman’s unlogical movies which involve spineless stories; or Shah Rukh’s overacting and uninteresting masala romance films, Aamir’s movies are worth watching. I do like Akshay Kumar however he rushes his films and leaves plot holes and unsolid scripts. When it comes to who is the best? Aamir prevails. His numerous achievements prove this, starting the 100, 200, 300 crore clubs. Bollywood fans must remember ” One roar of the lion silences the bleeping of a thousand sheeps”. Aamir Khan is the lion, Bollywood Cinema is the jungle; and we all know the Lion is the King of the jungle.

Varun Dhawan’s star power cannot be 200 because he has only ABCD 2 of 100cr, Dilwale he was a supporting actor, if you people add even supporting roles like that then Abhishek Bachchan had many of them like that, please change it .

This is nonsense way of star rating. If you take top ten overseas grosser, then why don’t take top ten domestics grosser. How come you evaluate equal for a movie earning $10~20 m and one earning $50~100 m. Why 100 crore and 300 crore get the equal points? It can be 100×1 for 100 crore 200×2 for 200 crore 300×3 for 300 crore 400×4 for 400 crore…..that should be the star power…..

Amitab bachchan not in list anywhere, atlest he is still bigger star than sushant singh rajput and arjun kapoor. Dhoom3, PK,Sultan collected 4-5 time more than other 100 cr movie, still getting the same point is not correct. now Dangal collect 1100 cr in oversees still 50 ponits..so the way of calculation of start power is wrong.

Shah Rukh Khan is very versatile actor, In whole bollywood industry till now no one actor can replace him. I can prove it also, if you do analysis from Diwana to Raees , he has broken all records.. According to me .. SRK was in first position, SRK right now in first position and upcoming 10 years SRK will be remain in first position.

Scoring 100 CR doesn’t make any sense until and unless it is declared hit/ superhit.Your way of calculation doesn’t sounds accurate because there are numbers of actors whose movies did fairly well at box-office in which they did with low -budget movies with just less numbers of screens.If you are to compare actors’s power index compare them on the basis of hit/super- hit in ratio-wise with the numbers of movies they acted,it will give accuracy because every actor doesn’t releases movie every year. Some actors release movie every alternate years and few actors release 2/3 movies every year.

Varun is better than Siddharth Malhotra..Ranbir Kapoor..Arjun..Aditya and none of his film have been flopped yet..this shows he is so versatile actor and is a future superstar..while on other hand his competition is mainly with ranbeer and. Arjun at this stage..while Sid is very much amateur actor ..his expressing skills is full to zero..Varun at this stage is equal to ranveer Singh! Admin should also add sushant singh rajput for 125 crore in Ms dhoni biopic! He should be at 15 ..

@koimoi team, The way you guys are calculating the star ranking doesnt make sense. For ex: movie budget was 120 crores and movie managed to get 101 crores,though movie is not even an average but the star appearing in that movie gets 100 points because it crosses 100 crores!!

Instead it should be calculated based on the profit % of their movies. For ex: If any star movie has a profit of 100% then give 100 points, if the movie gets flop and the loss was by 60% then deduct 60 points.

By the mid of 2019 Akshay will definitely earn somewhere around 1500-1600 points considering the fact that 2.0 will definitely going to earn at least 400 crores o indian box office, Gold may collect 150-200 crores, kesari for sure more than 200 crores and Padman may collect 100 points on boxoffice index foe AK too. 2018 will surely be Ak’s year.

What about women actors??? Don’t they figure in the ratings. Like in the case of Padmavat, Tannu weds Mannu, the movie ran/runs on the heroine unlike how Ranveer’s PR is hogging success in the former’s case. Or why is that R. Madhavan does not featured in the list for TWM. ?????

Overseas points are wrong here…I am not SRK fan but there are a number of films of SRK which have done huge business in foreign countries. Even “Dilwale” which was disaster in India, has done very good in overseas. SRK should have more overseas than any other actors.