Islamonausea, not Islamophobia

We should stop using Muslims’ self-chosen word – “Islamophobia” – by which they paint themselves into a corner of being feared: it destroys communication. Instead of such a divisive term, we should insert a more approachable and factual word that preserves opportunities for bridge-building and learning: “Islamonausea.” This does not render communication impossible, but enables visitors to our Western cultures to notice aspects of their behavior that make us sick.

It’s no wonder that Muslims use the word “Islamophobia” so often. Lacking convincing arguments, charm or constructive contributions to their surroundings, being feared is the only way to gain at least some kind of respect. The term Islamophobia, fear of Islam, points to what Muslims want, not to what non-Muslims feel. Who is afraid of Islam, anyway?

“Xenophobia,” an irrational fear of that which is strange or foreign, also doesn’t work. Aversion to Islam doesn’t come from unfamiliarity with the religion; in fact, it’s quite the opposite. There’s no reason to fear being called a racist, either, since neither Islam nor Muslims are a race.

Our language needs a term that describes what many critically thinking people feel about Islam according to their own terms, not according to what Muslims wish us to feel or what the PC establishment diagnoses to scare us into allowing more voters for the Left into our countries. We need a term that simultaneously invites Muslims to realize what they need to change about their behavior and religion if they wish to advance from an embarrassing last place in the evolution of civilizations and to earn some real respect among the world community.

Natural reaction

As in many other nauseating situations, Islamonausea is a normal and natural reaction to something abnormal, not vice versa.

The nausea reflex is innate, and it is biologically natural and healthy to experience emotional and bodily discomfort with anything that is unpleasant, unhealthy or harmful.

There is nothing phobic or racist in feeling nausea when hearing about the Islamic massacres performed by Muhammad and his many devout copycats through history and all over the world today. The same goes for Muhammad’s sexual relationship with a nine-year old girl, and the cutting off of limbs and stonings in the name of Allah and his Sharia laws.

Thinking of Muslims’ epidemic practice of forced inbreeding (which damages intelligence and increases the risk of psychiatric diseases) — often many generations in a row — one may also experience unpleasant feelings in the abdomen. There is also no shame in feeling nausea when hearing about the extreme social control, violence and murderous examples made to keep and scare hundreds of millions of their women from enjoying their human rights to chose their own sexual partners, clothing and lifestyle.

The many calls for hatred, violence and killing of non-Muslims commanded by the faultless Koran are outright disgusting. Imagining the pinnacle of evolution being a planet-sized Islamic caliphate is not only a complete embarrassment to the human race; it may also make one lose one’s appetite.

Examples

The word Islamonausea can be used to describe a feeling of nausea, disgust, displeasure, discomfort or aversion that arises by itself when encountering Islam or Islamic culture, or whatever or whoever represents it.

Examples of use of the word: “I’m not afraid of Islam, I have Islamonausea.” “I do not want minarets in my town. They give me Islamonausea.” “They got Islamonausea from all the Muslim immigrants and decided to move to another neighbourhood.” “Reading the Koran gives me Islamonausea.” “He got Islamonausea and decided to quit his job at the prison.” “I get Islamonausea hearing about all those honor killings.” “I get Islamonausea at the thought of eating Halal.” “I get Islamonausea seeing all those Muslims hopping up and down and shooting in the air, trying to scare us into respecting their childish behaviour.”

Prevalence

The first use of the word that I have been able to trace, is from 7 July 2005, in a comment on this website, Jihadwatch.org.

Here, a person calling himself Sheik Canuck, writes in aÂ commentÂ to an article on Muslims’ positive reaction to the Islamic suicide bombings in London that same day:

“I don’t have islamophobia, I have islamoNausea, I’m sick of them all.”

The first time it occurred in a Danish newspaper was in a letter by this writer in Nordjyske Stiftstidende on December 30th 2011, entitled “We have nausea“.

The term attracted some attention when the comedian, atheist and Islam critic Pat Condell used it in a video from 2009 called “Apologists for evil.”

Islamonausea deserves its own article on Wikipedia. Help get Islamonausea into our dictionaries by using the word on blogs, in articles and in Letters to the Editor, and in everyday speech.

10 thoughts on “Islamonausea, not Islamophobia”

islam is real.
it is not unhealthy to fear a real thing. that’s how we as humans, survive.
phobia is an unrealistic response to a real or imagined thing or idea…
one may be afraid to go outside, agoraphobic.
or one may what, choose to stay inside to avoid death? because the imagined threat of death by islam is not real?
whatever…
sombody plz tell me what didi wah didi means….?

Islamonausea is a natural “whole-of-person” reaction to the vile socialist cult that was first correctly identified by Sir Winston Churchill and named as “mohammedism”, the worship of mohammed, a goat-herdeing paedophile who became an effective and viscious conquerer of his own wandering desert tribes around 600AD. Up until the language “correction” applied by modern socialists” in the 1980’s, Mohammad was worshipped by “mohammadans” practising “mohammedism”. The recent use of the terms “Islam” for “mohammadism” and “mulsims” dor “mohammedans” was just a way of giving this sick and sexually pervertede personality cult a more convincing apperance of being a bona fide “religion”. Mahommed was a vicious and deranged paedophile and Mohammedans must demonstrate that they themselves are not in any way similar, or be rejected outright as sex offenders and murderers, just like thier so-called “prophet”..

Islam is extremely misleading. Like many other religions of the world, it failed miserably in building a better world.
One just have to realise that one cannot depend on Islam or any other religions to improve our life.
One do feel sick when one sees how they and other Asians are so unfit to run a country or how other Asians can get corrupted by them so easily.

So that no one would say I’m not even-handed, let’s keep to all the rich stuff that’s true, and let’s cut the Mohammad and Aisha pedophilia crap right out. King Alfonso X of Castile married Violant of Aragon when she was 10 going on 11 and valiantly tired to get her preggers for several years before finally lucking out (after she finally started having her period). And that’s just one Christian royal example of many.

Oh, forgot. If anyone wants to BS about Violant of Aragon ((8 June 1236–1301), married December 26 1246), here’s the simple basic link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violant_of_Aragon. There’s enough serious good stuff to focus on, regarding radical Islam, so let’s get this stupid “pedophilia” non-starter off the agenda. We all might have one Christian European royal “pedophile” or another in our genealogy lines.

Lets get this BS straight ….
“…. Like many other religions of the world, it failed miserably in building a better world.”
ISLAM – is NOT a Religion – ISLAM is a VILE MALEVOLENT Paedophilic Political Ideology.
ISLAM – has failed miserably (in its objective) – NO!
ISLAM – Never set out to build a better World – Muhammadans are to Lazy.
ISLAM – has the goal of enslaving the entire population of earth – so Muhammadans can do even less than they do now !
ISLAM – intimidates “DHIMMIS” to do the work for them.

Hence the Muhammadans’ creation … by intimidation… of Australia’s Cowardly Politician and Political “Dhimmis” into Assisting/Enabling ISLAM and thereby these Politicians and Politicals being guilty of Treason/Sedition against Australia.

I find that people either ‘get it’ about muslims, or there is nothing that can be said, no evidence that can be presented, that will convince them that Iz-lamb is a problem.

I usually get one of two arguments: the “meanie, meanie, big bad meanie” argument, or the “some of the other kids do it too” argument.

I guess what it will take is for some bloodthirsty lunatics to saw their heads off, or rape their wives, or throw acid on their daughters, or beat them to death with rocks, screaming ‘allah akbar’. Then perhaps they will understand.