OSNews: http://www.osnews.com/story/21282/Intel_Details_Moorestown_Platform_Two_New_Atom_Chips
Exploring the Future of Computingen-usCopyright 2001-2016, David Adamsadam+nospam@osnews.comFri, 09 Dec 2016 18:05:45 GMThttp://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gifOSNews.comhttp://www.osnews.com
no new informationshttp://www.osnews.com/thread?357769
http://www.osnews.com/thread?357769the article doesn't provide any informations. theregister, while confusing the moorstown prototype and the two new atoms, at least gives us one little bit:

Chandrasekher's demo was a side-by-side showdown between a Moorsetown prototype and a current Atom-based system which showed a greater than 10X improvement in power-miserliness for the upcoming MID platform.

that just might bring it in the the same power region as the competing arm-plattforms (thought it might be telling that tey don't compare their new design with them), but will it still be fast enough? arstechnicas stokes doesn't think so:

For everyone who doesn't care about x86 in a handheld form factor, there's the new ARM Cortex A9-based OMAP4 line from TI (also at 45nm), which will absolutely murder Moorestown at performance per watt for pretty much any workload that matters. I don't have numbers for either of these platforms to give you, but I don't think there will be any contest between the Moorestown platform (two 45nm chips, one with an in-order x86 core) and OMAP4 (a single 45nm chip with an out-of-order ARM core) in a direct performance/watt bakeoff.