I watched the video -- out of eight people 1 said they were for Obama and 1 said they were for Romney. I think Romney has done a good job of not seeming "unacceptable," which is probably a blow to the president's strategy, and getting anyone to say nice things about Romney on MSNBC is quite a feat, but it was split 50/50. Just like the other polls I've seen that asked if the second debate made you more likely to go one way or the other...

Wow. Do you do ANYTHING here besides 1. Hit and run with cut and paste articles and 2. Deflect the content of stories you don't like by griping about what websites they are reported on?

Little does Wee-Wee, A.K.A., Direckshun, know that I didn't get this off of Drudge. I heard about it on the radio on the way to work and went to the Weekly Standard directly.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

All kinds of people vote. Not enough of those people think highly enough of Trump to make him President but all kinds of people vote.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

So, if they were polling better than Trump and the primary goal was to prevent Hillary from becoming POTUS, perhaps it would have been a better strategic decision to nominate someone who actually had a chance of beating her and preventing that than nominating Donald Trump.

What did you think of orange constantly copying and pasting from HuffPo?

Exhausting, was it not?

Now -- imagine that's where he got all his news from.

My entire thing is that Pete has immersed himself in rightwing media, predominantly Drudge. And this has had two consequences:

He has become a rightwing demagogue as a result.

He's become really misinformed as a result.

Take this article, for instance, which a GOP-sponsored outlet, linked by the GOP-sponsored Drudge, claims that a singular MSNBC panel was swayed.

When in reality:

So long as Pete is going to blindly swallow the bullshit the conservative media feeds him, I'm going to expose him as the puppet he is.

Do you feel like you're adding anything with those posts? It just makes me take you less seriously and less likely to give you the benefit of the doubt when you post something that will take some effort to sift through.

I'll read through a long post/article from a poster who has consistently worthwhile takes. Nobody falls in and out of that category more than you.