The Jewish dietary laws have nothing to do with cannibalism, but seem to be based on health issues related to the keeping of pork, for instance, in a hot climate.

I won't comment off topic from this thread beyond this, but I wanted to say something about Rosie's statement that I suspect even many Jews are not aware of.

Jewish dietary laws are, of course, designed to advance the ethnoracial interests of The Chosen. However, health is not the primary factor behind many of them. For example, shrimp is also considered to be unclean. Why? The reason is because pigs and shrimp do not fit into the other main categories of animals (e.g., pig is not in the goat or cow group, and shrimp is not a fish, nor a land dwelling animal, yet has both gills and legs). Thus, pigs and shrimp represent race mixing and are thus forbidden!

Furthermore, the people who developed Judaism and Islam had a great understanding about how to enslave the human mind. The devil is in the details, the little things. For example, it seems not so much to ask a follower to avoid pork, or to bow down to Mecca five times a day. So, religious Jews and Muslims obey this "easy stuff". However, there are at least two big consequences of so doing: (1) The religion is then pretty much always on one's mind - to avoid eating the wrong thing and to always know in which direction Mecca is; and (2) people who obey the small commandments are unlikely to break the larger ones. The Jew who does not eat pork is unlikely to ever commit the greater sin of marrying a Gentile.

It seems no small amount of thought went into many of the Jewish and Islamic commandments.

I won't comment off topic from this thread beyond this, but I wanted to say something about Rosie's statement that I suspect even many Jews are not aware of.

Jewish dietary laws are, of course, designed to advance the ethnoracial interests of The Chosen. However, health is not the primary factor behind many of them. For example, shrimp is also considered to be unclean. Why? The reason is because pigs and shrimp do not fit into the other main categories of animals (e.g., pig is not in the goat or cow group, and shrimp is not a fish, nor a land dwelling animal, yet has both gills and legs). Thus, pigs and shrimp represent race mixing and are thus forbidden!

Furthermore, the people who developed Judaism and Islam had a great understanding about how to enslave the human mind. The devil is in the details, the little things. For example, it seems not so much to ask a follower to avoid pork, or to bow down to Mecca five times a day. So, religious Jews and Muslims obey this "easy stuff". However, there are at least two big consequences of so doing: (1) The religion is then pretty much always on one's mind - to avoid eating the wrong thing and to always know in which direction Mecca is; and (2) people who obey the small commandments are unlikely to break the larger ones. The Jew who does not eat pork is unlikely to ever commit the greater sin of marrying a Gentile.

It seems no small amount of thought went into many of the Jewish and Islamic commandments.

Very interesting. There are numerous writings on this subject, going back centuries. Roman historian Tacitus (Histories; 5th book) tells us that Jews abstained from pork because the pig was infected with the same leprous disease which had plagued the Jews: “They abstain from swine’s flesh, in consideration of what they suffered when they were infected by the leprosy to which this animal is liable.”

Plutarch said that the Greeks were unsure if the Jews “hated” or “worshipped” swine, for although pigs were considered unclean and could not be eaten, neither was the killing of pigs allowed. He also claims that in ancient times the wild boar was the totem of the Jews.

Others point to ancient dietary laws, i.e.: Deuteronomy 14:8 which states, “The pig, because it has a split hoof but doesn’t chew the cud, is unclean to you: of their flesh you shall not eat, and their carcasses you shall not touch.”

Anita says the holocaust must never be repeated as she waves at a projected photo of Adolf Hitler.

Anita says when Bergen-Belsen was liberated they found a warehouse full of bread. But they realised it was poisoned when birds pecking at it were dropping down stone-dead. Anita also says if the British has arrived at the camp a day later thousands more would have died.

Anita says the holocaust must never be repeated as she waves at a projected photo of Adolf Hitler.

Anita says when Bergen-Belsen was liberated they found a warehouse full of bread. But they realised it was poisoned when birds pecking at it were dropping down stone-dead. Anita also says if the British has arrived at the camp a day later thousands more would have died.

Anita says the holocaust must never be repeated as she waves at a projected photo of Adolf Hitler.

Anita says when Bergen-Belsen was liberated they found a warehouse full of bread. But they realised it was poisoned when birds pecking at it were dropping down stone-dead. Anita also says if the British has arrived at the camp a day later thousands more would have died.
...

On Belsen one should know:

Translation:

Bergen 12 April 1945.

Agreement between the Commander of Bergen Military Training Area and the Chief of Staff of the opposing English (British) Corps.

The Camp Commander has an order from the S.S. Reichsführer, for obvious reasons, to surrender Bergen Camp along with two S.S. Concentration Camps (containing approximately 60000 Prisoners) and the Hungarian Troops and their families to the English (British) Armed Forces to prevent further fighting in this area.

Details are as follows:

1.) The area detailed on the map marked with black crosses at the road entry points is designated a neutral zone.

2.) Both sides agree to carry out all necessary actions to ensure no conflict, the use of heavy weapons, or air raids occur within, or into, this area.

3.) If possible, withdrawing German troops will not enter the neutral zone.

4.) The German Armed Forces will deploy warning signs at the points indicated with black crosses on the map. These signs are to display the warning 'Danger Typhus' to the outside of the area, and 'End of Typhus Area' on the inner side.

5.) The German Armed Forces are responsible for:

a.) The custody of the prisoners and the detachment of S.S. Guards until 1200 hrs 13 April 1945. Any remaining S.S. Guards after this time are to be treated as Prisoners of War.

b.) Continuation and management of the supply facilities.

c.) Continuation and management of the Telephone Exchange.

until the English (British) Armed Forces take over.

6.) The German and Hungarian guards are to wear white armbands on the left lower arm. They are not to carry out any offensive action against the English (British) Armed Forces. On the other hand the English (British) Armed Forces are commited to allow these armed guards and supply personnel unhindered withdrawal to German lines, complete with their weapons, equipment and vehicles after six days of taking control of the camps.

7.) The S.S. Supply and Administration personnel, the camp Doctor and those who supply food and sanitation will carry out their duties until relieved by the English (British) Armed Forces.

8.) The Hungarian troops and their families were given sufficient food on 10 April 1945 to last four weeks. The supply of additional food, if necessary, is the responsibilty of the English (British) Armed Forces.

9.) The spirit of these negotations is to prevent a disaster for both opposing forces and the local civilian population caused by escaping prisoners.

Both parties declare to carry out all necessary actions to fulfill this agreement as longer as they do not hamper war activities.

Yes, there was a ceasefire agreement made between the armies on April 12, three days before the camp was officially handed over. The need for the agreement was the prevalence of typhus affecting both armies, and also some instances were British soldiers enraged by the horrors they had witnessed in the camp shot Hungarian troops.

Brigadier Hughes of the British Army:

"The conditions in the camp were really indescribable; no description nor photograph could really bring home the horrors that were there outside the huts, and the frightful scenes inside were much worse. There were various sizes of piles of corpses lying all over the camp, some in between the huts. The compounds themselves had bodies lying about in them. The gutters were full and within the huts there were uncountable numbers of bodies, some even in the same bunks as the living. Near the crematorium were signs of filled-in mass graves, and outside to the left of the bottom compound was an open pit half-full of corpses. It had just begun to be filled. Some of the huts had bunks but not many, and they were filled absolutely to overflowing with prisoners in every state of emaciation and disease. There was not room for them to lie down at full length in each hut. In the most crowded there were anything from 600 to 1000 people in accommodation which should only have taken 100. [...]

After (yet again) stepping on a rake and having it hit her in the face by claiming that the evil nazis poisoned the bread at Belsen before fleeing the Death Camp, Rosie now demands that Hektor "ackowledges" that some people in Belsen died from Typhus. Which was exactly what Hektor posted.

We've missed you, Rosie. No one can add humor to these Tales better than you.