I am glad he won. We all know the only reason he was selected for this type of character assassination was his parentage, something over which none of us have control. This may sound disgustingly liberal of me but what consenting adults get up to in private is their concern only, and of no interest to me for one. I can't see where public interest comes into play here at all. This was just sensationalism, titilation and voyeuristic gutter journalism at it's worst. And what's more, parts of it turned out to be completely untrue. Will this deter further intrusions into private lives? I doubt it. Elements of the most stupid of the sheeple gobble-up this kind of prurient rubbish with a spoon.

Sir Oswald Mosley and Lady Diana Mosley, would turn in their graves if they new thier son had turned into a pervert.

So are you saying that your sole desire and thought and intention when it comes to matters sexual, is the procreation of children?

Because this sole desire and thought and intention represents the only valid approach to matters sexual if one takes what appears to be your position to its logical conclusion. Any desire, thought or intention arising from or having effect towards any other aim must be held to be a perversion by such conclusion - and having known many men, I can tell you that I havent yet met one who wouldnt be a pervert by this standard, and presumably condemned by it.

Human sexuality is not solely about the procreation of children; indeed this is why it has been so necessary over the ages and across cultures to repress sexuality utterly in order to impose the false model which you seem to espouse. We in the west have lost much of that repression, but one only has to look at Islam to see how it is fulfilled.

And here's the rub; it is precisely because of this false model of sexuality and the repression that it necessitates that many develop strong psychodramas whereby to deal with the nature of their sexuality - fantasies such as BDSM and fetishism being two aspects so developed.

This would make Mr Mosley and his antics not the product of some character defect, but an expression of perfectly natural desires, thoughts and intentions twisted by the strong cultural bias when he was a child and young man which still repressed sexuality.

So are you saying that your sole desire and thought and intention when it comes to matters sexual, is the procreation of children?

Because this sole desire and thought and intention represents the only valid approach to matters sexual if one takes what appears to be your position to its logical conclusion. Any desire, thought or intention arising from or having effect towards any other aim must be held to be a perversion by such conclusion - and having known many men, I can tell you that I havent yet met one who wouldnt be a pervert by this standard, and presumably condemned by it.

Human sexuality is not solely about the procreation of children; indeed this is why it has been so necessary over the ages and across cultures to repress sexuality utterly in order to impose the false model which you seem to espouse. We in the west have lost much of that repression, but one only has to look at Islam to see how it is fulfilled.

And here's the rub; it is precisely because of this false model of sexuality and the repression that it necessitates that many develop strong psychodramas whereby to deal with the nature of their sexuality - fantasies such as BDSM and fetishism being two aspects so developed.

This would make Mr Mosley and his antics not the product of some character defect, but an expression of perfectly natural desires, thoughts and intentions twisted by the strong cultural bias when he was a child and young man which still repressed sexuality.

So are you saying that your sole desire and thought and intention when it comes to matters sexual, is the procreation of children?

Because this sole desire and thought and intention represents the only valid approach to matters sexual if one takes what appears to be your position to its logical conclusion. Any desire, thought or intention arising from or having effect towards any other aim must be held to be a perversion by such conclusion - and having known many men, I can tell you that I havent yet met one who wouldnt be a pervert by this standard, and presumably condemned by it.

Human sexuality is not solely about the procreation of children; indeed this is why it has been so necessary over the ages and across cultures to repress sexuality utterly in order to impose the false model which you seem to espouse. We in the west have lost much of that repression, but one only has to look at Islam to see how it is fulfilled.

And here's the rub; it is precisely because of this false model of sexuality and the repression that it necessitates that many develop strong psychodramas whereby to deal with the nature of their sexuality - fantasies such as BDSM and fetishism being two aspects so developed.

This would make Mr Mosley and his antics not the product of some character defect, but an expression of perfectly natural desires, thoughts and intentions twisted by the strong cultural bias when he was a child and young man which still repressed sexuality.

FS

When I joined Nationalism in the 1970, this would have been scorned upon, by all right thinking Nationalists. The fact it is not by so - called nationalists of today speaks volumes. You, and not doubt many others, have been corrupted and mislead by today's filth masquerading as healthy sexual desires.

In addition, your theory on human sexuality came from the pages of Sigmund Freud, did it not? The Jews, took sex out the bedroom, twisted, and perverted it and that is why most people have these problems today.

In addition, your theory on human sexuality came from the pages of Sigmund Freud, did it not? The Jews, took sex out the bedroom, twisted, and perverted it and that is why most people have these problems today.

As it happens, my interest in sexual psychology was first derived from an interesting old book I picked up at a fair twenty years ago; Psychopathia Sexualis by Richard von Krafft Ebing was I seem to recall the first such work ever written, preceding Freud by a few years. Since then I have educated myself quite well in my opinion on the wherefores and whys of human sexuality - and I would say that Jewish or not, Freud was well adrift with his conclusions. Von Krafft Ebing had more accurate conclusions, albeit they were strongly influenced by the mores of his time.

But the problem with blaming Freud and by extension the Jews is simple - this stuff has been going on for centuries across all cultures, even those who had never seen or heard of a Jew. Unless we are to conclude that Jews possess some supernatural influence able to cross time and space and provoke "perversions" then they cannot be held responsible - and if they do possess such supernatural influence, then we are lost.

And yet you're also quite correct in laying the blame at the door of the Jews, even if your methodology and conclusion are erroneous.

Because it is the Jewish model of sexuality which most strongly represses sexuality - a model which we inherited through Christianity and which much of the rest of the world inherited through Islam. It is this model which causes natural human sexuality to express itself in strange forms because regardless of the cultural background, regardless of the repression, human sexuality is strong and must be expressed in one way or another. It will break forth whatever the repression.

As for me I have no problem with anyone else's expression of their sexuality as long as everyone involved is able to consent and gives consent, no one is harmed and I dont have to see it. That many however seem to have such problems over this matter is interesting evidence of the exact repression of which I speak still actively being enforced by some inner voice - an inner voice which would have me in a burkha, circumcised and treated as cattle; and that simply isnt going to happen.

When I joined Nationalism in the 1970, this would have been scorned upon, by all right thinking Nationalists. The fact it is not by so - called nationalists of today speaks volumes. You, and not doubt many others, have been corrupted and mislead by today's filth masquerading as healthy sexual desires.

In addition, your theory on human sexuality came from the pages of Sigmund Freud, did it not? The Jews, took sex out the bedroom, twisted, and perverted it and that is why most people have these problems today.

I for one have never understood Nationalist obsession with sexuality. What consenting adults do with each other is not perverse. Its being anti it thats the real source of the perversion