(SEO), (SERP), (NLP), Holonyms, Synonyms, Antonyms, Taxonomy

LINGUISTICS ORGANIC SEARCH ENGINE THEORY
(LOSE-T) PART XIII

In paper VI Search Engine Optimization (SEO), (SERP), (NLP), Paronyms, Hyponyms, Meronyms, Hypernyms, we explored a myriad of taxonomies, hence we’ll use paper VI as a reference point. Holonyms are the whole of a subset or smaller part, synonymous to meronyms being the subset of a whole part; holonyms are synonymous to hyponyms and hypernyms in terms of the former ascribes to smaller part of a larger classification, and the latter ascribes to the larger part of a smaller classification. Whereas holonyms deals with the whole part of a smaller subset.

Holonyms are classified in polar opposites to meronyms in that they deals with subsets to a larger whole. Examples, “fingers, and “toes,” are the meronyms of hands, and “feet,” and “hands, and “feet,” are the holonyms of “fingers,” and “toes.” Hyponyms and hypernyms are antonymous classifications; example, “fish,” is the hypernym of “salmon,” and “piano,” is the hyponym of “instruments.” Notice the different between the four classifications? Holonyms and meronyms is attributed to the “subset-whole,” relationship; whereas, hyponyms and hypernyms ascribe to the “small-large classification.”

Synonyms is the taxonomical relationship phrases or lexemes similar in meanings; example, hypernyms and holonyms are synonyms in the abstract sense because both concepts explicate the whole and broad scope of subsets and classifications. Example,” flower,” is the hypernyms of “tulips,” “daisy,” “roses,” and “hibiscus;” and “hands,” and “feet,” are the holonyms of “fingers,” and “toes.” The difference between the former and latter is the classifications vs the subsets, but they’re synonymous because they’re the superior order in both representations.

Synonyms are classified into dominant classifications because of its general use, and subordinate classifications because of its secondary usage. General words such as “smart,” being the generally used term may be the dominant synonym compared to terms such as “canny,” “and “astute;” although the latter terms have slightly different meanings they’re denotationally comparable. Remember synonyms are not contingent on exact parallels, a near relation is enough to constitute the association, and the most generally used terms of these classifications becomes the neutral dominance.

Whereas hyponyms and meronyms are synonymous in the conceptual sense because the former is the specifics of a broad scope or whole, and the latter is the subset of a whole or larger part. Example; “daisy,” “roses,” and “hibiscus,” are the hyponyms of “flowers,” and “fingers,” and “toes,” are the meronyms of “hands,” and “feet.” Notice the synonymity between hyponyms and meronyms? They’re synonymous because they’re the inferior order in both representations. Let’s explore these same concepts using antonymous representations.

Antonyms are the complete contrast or polar opposite of synonyms in that they’re semantically polarized in their denotation; I’ll use holonyms and meronyms as examples (AGAIN); “hands,” and “feet,” are the holonyms of “fingers,” and “toes,” and “fingers,” and “toes,” are the meronyms of “hands,” and “feet.” Hyponyms and hypernyms are antonymous because they’re contrasted in meanings; example “daisy,” “roses,” and “hibiscus,” are the hyponyms of “flowers,” and “flowers,” are the hypernyms of “daisy,” “roses,” and “hibiscus.” Synonymously speaking, “hyponyms-meronyms,” and “holonyms-hypernyms,” are related; antonymic-ally, “hyponyms-hypernyms,” and “holonyms-meronyms,” are related. These semantic definitions are paronyms because of their derivational and inflectional morphological relationships, hence the interchangeable use in syntax….

SYNONYMS
Hyponyms – (smaller part of a larger classification)
Meronyms – (the subset of a whole)

Hypernyms – ( larger classification of a smaller part)
Holonyms – (the whole of a subset)

Taxonomy is a term prevalent in biology and used for the classification of organisms, organizing species based on similarities. You’ve probably seen taxonomic infographics depicting the arranged genus of different species. Taxonomy applies within the context of semantics and the subset of linguistics synonyms and antonyms pervades; this process classifies lexemes, figurative and rhetorical devices into their own species of taxonomy. One of the conundrum in Natural Language Process (NLP), is the Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD), and machines inability to unequivocally discern different sorts of ambiguity. Linguistics Organic Search Engine Theory (LOSE-T), demystifies ambiguity by curating the taxonomic aspect of semantics, phonology, grammar, punctuation, phonetics, morphology and syntax.

Holonyms, synonyms and antonyms are peculiar sorts of ambiguity, because they’re not predicated on the noun and verb disparity; phonological aspect of sound; punctuation to alter syntax, or grammatical functions. The functions represent associative meanings; example, “ubiquitous,” “prevalent,” “pervasive,” “pervade,” “propagate,” and “promulgate;” they’re either adjectives or verbs that share synonymous semantics. This is another kind of semantic ambiguity; the adjacent and proximity that induces vague distinctions; these devices explicate taxonomy the search query excludes from the curation, unless, it’s manually searched by someone studying literature.