Man Ordaining Man Righteous

June 29, 2014

What I find somewhat fascinating, but also of serious concern, is the way “religious” view what is their enemy. The Christian, for the most part, sees his enemy in those who oppose his beliefs—what he “understands” as biblical knowledge (through traditions, doctrine …), or the teachings of the bible, which most denominational Christians believe is without rival. At some point in his Denomination career, he is taught that the enemy exists in the worldly or secular characters who disagree “strongly” with his practices, and actively oppose these (abortion, same-sex marriage, atheism, to name just three). He is semi-conscious of a Spiritual Realm. He is semi-conscious of evil, and he is semi-conscious of what is of God.

Now, look at an opposite approach:

To have faith in Christ means not only to stand aloof from the delights of this life, but also to endure patiently every temptation and test that brings upon us distress, affliction and misfortune, for as long as God wishes and until He comes to us. “I waited patiently for the Lord and He heard me’ (Psalm 40:1). Symeon the New Theologian, Volume Four, Text 2, The Philokalia

In looking at Symeon’s text, one might counter it with “Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded.” James 4.8. Both passages in bold come from “the bible”, but are both saying the same thing. Are both of the same treaty? No, and here’s why. In waiting patiently for the Lord, one is actively processing the incoming within his Spiritual Gift, should he have some understanding of “what” this is. He is the infant waiting to be “picked up”—called—ignited. “He heard me” is saying “He SEES my readiness.” I is ready for moving into “me”, and “me” is “lived” in the Spiritual Realm of “love the Lord your God” through this passage in John:

I am the way the truth and the life; no one comes to the Father but through ME.

You see, “Me” is a dynamic Character of insistence. It is beyond hope. Hope is left at that beginning point of recognition when I and Me understand its difference. Two countries agree to growth. In the James passage, One is speaking IN THE SPIRIT, as James was/is in the Spirit. When you are In the Spirit, you are taught on the ethics of Being, and this is when one becomes drawn and not merely “inspired by” or “led by” Spirit. The “double-minded” seems harsh in the passage of James, but what it is teaching on LOVE is this: you live in two countries in disagreement. Your mind and heart are not of ONE Faith—ONE VOICE. This is telling you that you must becomepure—VIRGINAL. This Virginal State has little or nothing to do with celibacy as religious/worldly understand celibacy. So, if you are married to a DENOMINATION in your celibate state, you are very likely unable to be in the Spirit, and therefore, ACCESSING SPIRITUAL GIFT CONTINUES TO BE A WAITING RATHER THAN A PURIFYING OR BEING DRAWN NEAR TO GOD. During the many years of this state of expectation, many things can happen, and this is where the spirit enemy has easy access.

In order to understand what is being said here, one must understand first that what you invite IN will have an affect IN you. Once something—anything—is invited in, your mind begins a filtering process through what already exists within. The passage, ” Neither is new wine put into old wineskins. If it is, the skins burst and the wine is spilled and the skins are destroyed. But new wine is put into fresh wineskins, and so both are preserved”is what Lord is teaching on the impure mind, or the heart not having ascended “to the mind.” The two are not in agreement. What the believer of God needs to ask of himself through God, not man, religious man, is: what is in my mind and what is in my heart … to determine WORTH of Godliness, or Christlikeness— the proverbial IMAGE OF GOD.

but if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light in you is darkness, how great is the darkness!

The reason I touch on the topic of the Spirit Realm, and truly I have only touched on it, is because of the following.

In 1284, while the town of Hamelin was suffering from a rat infestation, a piper dressed in colorful red clothing appeared, claiming to be a rat-catcher. He promised the mayor a solution to their problem with the rats. The mayor in turn promised to pay him for the removal of the rats. The piper accepted, and played his pipe to lure the rats into the Weser River, where all but one drowned. Despite the piper’s success, the mayor reneged on his promise and refused to pay him the full sum. The piper left the town angrily, vowing to return later to take revenge. On Saint John and Paul’s day, while the Hamelinites were in church, the piper returned, dressed in green, like a hunter, playing his pipe, and in so doing attracting the town’s children. One hundred and thirty children followed him out of town, where they were lured into a cave and never seen again. Depending on the version, at most three children remained behind: One was lame and could not follow quickly enough, the second was deaf and followed the other children out of curiosity, and the last was blind and unable to see where he was going. These three informed the villagers of what had happened when they came out from church.

Another version relates that the Pied Piper led the children into following him to the top of Koppelberg Hill, where he took them to a beautiful land and had his wicked way,[3] or a place called Koppenberg Mountain,[4] or that he made them walk into the Weser like he did with the rats, and they all drowned. Some versions state that the Piper returned the children after payment, or that he returned the children after the villagers paid several times the original amount of gold.

What of the one rat left behind? The piper himself? The mayor? Or the church?

**********

From the article: “Measures will be taken so he is in a precise restricted location, without any freedom of movement, since he has been found guilty of a serious crime and is awaiting further legal action,” said the Vatican’s chief spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi.

A bishop from the Dominican Republic was recently reported to say that he was shocked to see Wesolowski walking freely on the streets of central Rome. Prosecutors in the Caribbean nation have said they have convincing evidence that the prelate molested young men.

He has also been accused of abuse in his native Poland. The Vatican rejected an extradition request from the Warsaw prosecutor’s office on the grounds he was “a citizen of the Vatican” and holds diplomatic immunity.

SNAP, the Chicago-based support group for victims of clerical sexual abuse, said the former nuncio’s sentence did not go far enough and he should be handed over to secular authorities.

“Wesolowski should face a criminal trial, not a church proceeding,” said SNAP’s national director, David Clohessy. “And he should be in a secular jail. And he might have been in one for months, had Vatican officials cooperated with law enforcement.”

Wesolowski was ordained as a priest and bishop by St. John Paul II. He served as an envoy to the Dominican Republic for five years until he was recalled last year.”

Storytellers, artists, mystics … and prophets are forever showing mankind/humankind the enemy and his deeds. Did the Roman Catholic Church’s SAINT John Paul II see the illicit mind of this Vatican official? He did not even see it in Macial Maciel, his primary focus. … but if the eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness (Matthew 6.23). This is evidence that John Paul II was not of VIRGINAL BEING, and is therefore not able to be in the Spirit, and not responsible for miracles of another. And please, allow me to explain a bit on this. Even if one is in the Spirit, he is not responsible for healing. It is never an individual who is credited for the Spiritual breath and life in human. To be one with the One (understood as Lord God Almighty) is a Community of the Godly. This is the Spirit. God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.Man is only semi-conscious of this Realm, as he is only semi-conscious of the realm of the enemy, and how it operates.

The eye is the vortex of visual synoptics. It sees in a divided state or a unified place of Understanding. JPII had his eye on something other than God, and in this state, he chose to ignore the illicit and desperate acts within his institution, an institution that his doctrine of faith fathered and fathers. There is much more to be said about the culture and practices of the Roman Catholic Church and denominations like this.

WE are at a crossroads in the UNDERSTANDING OF BOTH THE MESSENGERS OF LIGHT (Truth and Reason), AND THOSE OF EVIL DIMENSION.

WE are witnessing the damage institution of certain religious ethics have on its members, and how it breeds within society. This is just one prime example. As I said before, the RCC pushed, demanding to be in the spotlight—desiring to rise above all others in the worldly religious. History shows us this through his behavior, and even today, we see the favoritism paid to the pope through news media, etc. Okay, the heat is on, and the RCC will be examined. Are these people ready—willing—to have the entire organization, individual by individual, investigated? Including laity? How many of the RC bishops have behaved similarly? How many of all of these members knew and looked away? Why? Because they believe these men are somehow special? Because traditions are of a character within old wineskins? Because the belief is that “last rites automatically gets him into heaven”? That purgatory will erase all evils? This is what is understood as FATALISTIC DOGMA. This is not exactly a stable mindset.

There are people who can see what works in these, and what mankind institutes for agenda, and please understand one thing; I see those who act out in this manner as being within the following province:

Abusive priests suffering from paradoxical fatigue? Many live under a disguisethat tears at the heartmind to the point of viciousness. They prey on the children because they long for innocence. They have never grown up, having lived under their disguise … and the aging process within this fermenting mind erodes and acts out. A catholic responded: which explains to a degree the excusing.

Are they reaping what they have sown? These illicit practices and acts disgust us, and create fear and horror in the communities. When are they going to do what needs to be done? They endanger many. If their government does not care about the well being of its children and its citizens …

It’s their choice, but do understand that no one else should be subject to these traditions and practices. No one should have to worry about abusive religious walking the streets. I said this in an earlier essay, and I will say it again; it’s not just about YOU, Religious, and how the world should serve you your rights when your leadership has been involved in these acts—acts against not just the children, but also women, and those having come to your schools for education. Your practices do affect others, and I am asking YOU to do something about it.

I think it should be more concerned with the RIGHTS OF THOSE WITH LITTLE TO NO CHOICE—The Children. Those who are victims of this dynasty and those like it, need the help of people who understand how these acts can deteriorate a majority over time. Why are the GOVERNMENTS SO SLOW TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CHILDREN? Is it more profitable in these other venues? Votes? Money? Support? Are government officials paying into these sweeping edicts for its own self-interests?

And what of this? How many have taken advantage of the poor pouring into the US?