On this, it's a hard call. Agwambo stated clearly he's looking for a Win-win situation for all participants. I think that's an olive branch. He laid out a case for withdrawing and whether you think some have Merritt or not, it was curious he did not add security withdrawal which Kalonzo has been addressing lately. He has many directions to come up on any case on withdrawal. Looks like a compromise. But Agwambo has not not us what he'd do for the people if elected

babuu is so generous! He can just pull out 90 days from his ass and donate for the "reform of IEBC". Such an altruistic man. Except outside of his bewildered base, nobody thinks it is his place to dictate to us.

Babuu is hoping to negotiate accomodation in the streets, at Chatham house, foreign Embassies- ANYWHERE BUT THE BALLOT.

On this, it's a hard call. Agwambo stated clearly he's looking for a Win-win situation for all participants. I think that's an olive branch. He laid out a case for withdrawing and whether you think some have Merritt or not, it was curious he did not add security withdrawal which Kalonzo has been addressing lately. He has many directions to come up on any case on withdrawal. Looks like a compromise. But Agwambo has not not us what he'd do for the people if elected

babuu is so generous! He can just pull out 90 days from his ass and donate for the "reform of IEBC". Such an altruistic man. Except outside of his bewildered base, nobody thinks it is his place to dictate to us.

Babuu is hoping to negotiate accomodation in the streets, at Chatham house, foreign Embassies- ANYWHERE BUT THE BALLOT.

On this, it's a hard call. Agwambo stated clearly he's looking for a Win-win situation for all participants. I think that's an olive branch. He laid out a case for withdrawing and whether you think some have Merritt or not, it was curious he did not add security withdrawal which Kalonzo has been addressing lately. He has many directions to come up on any case on withdrawal. Looks like a compromise. But Agwambo has not not us what he'd do for the people if elected

The only power we can share with Jubilee is Electricity. ~ Raila Amollo Odinga

Aukot’s application is likely to include him in the ballot. As it were,there is no clear reason why Maraga sent him to High Court while it entertained Chebu, yet both sought direction on SCOK’s pronouncements.

Now,
If Aukot is included, IEBC will proceed with the elections. This will immediately be challenged by NASA and will cause chaos among the usual suspects.

Grounds for challenging it
1. Whether paragraph 290 was obiter dicta or ratio decidendi....
2. If it was ratio whether withdrawal rules went against it
3

"No warrior entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier." (2 Timothy 2:4)..

Aukot’s application is likely to include him in the ballot. As it were,there is no clear reason why Maraga sent him to High Court while it entertained Chebu, yet both sought direction on SCOK’s pronouncements.

Now,
If Aukot is included, IEBC will proceed with the elections. This will immediately be challenged by NASA and will cause chaos among the usual suspects.

Grounds for challenging it
1. Whether paragraph 290 was obiter dicta or ratio decidendi....
2. If it was ratio whether withdrawal rules went against it
3

Pastor Bandia, why is Aukot's application likely to succeed? If you have a copy of his application and his arguments do share it. IEBC need not wait for Aukot. They can 1) Ask the Supreme Court for an advisory opinion 2) Go ahead with the election by letting Jakuon know that he is time barred (or has failed to follow withdrawal procedures) and let NASWA go to court

Aukot was contesting his exclusion by IEBC, in other words he was seeking a judgment. IEBC are seeking a clarification of a court ruling that issued a directive to Chebukati. They are not one and the same course of action. Do you not recall this case against IEBC? Matters of participation as a candidate need to be initiated at the High Court, not the Supreme Court.

The High court has ordered Independent Election and boundaries commission (IEBC) to receive documents of presidential aspirant Peter Solomon Gichira, and issue him with their response on his eligibility to vie as an independent candidate within 36 hours.https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2001243785

Aukot’s application is likely to include him in the ballot. As it were,there is no clear reason why Maraga sent him to High Court while it entertained Chebu, yet both sought direction on SCOK’s pronouncements.

Now,
If Aukot is included, IEBC will proceed with the elections. This will immediately be challenged by NASA and will cause chaos among the usual suspects.

Grounds for challenging it
1. Whether paragraph 290 was obiter dicta or ratio decidendi....
2. If it was ratio whether withdrawal rules went against it
3

Pastor Bandia, why is Aukot's application likely to succeed? If you have a copy of his application and his arguments do share it. IEBC need not wait for Aukot. They can 1) Ask the Supreme Court for an advisory opinion 2) Go ahead with the election by letting Jakuon know that he is time barred (or has failed to follow withdrawal procedures) and let NASWA go to court

Aukot was contesting his exclusion by IEBC, in other words he was seeking a judgment. IEBC are seeking a clarification of a court ruling that issued a directive to Chebukati. They are not one and the same course of action. Do you not recall this case against IEBC? Matters of participation as a candidate need to be initiated at the High Court, not the Supreme Court.

The High court has ordered Independent Election and boundaries commission (IEBC) to receive documents of presidential aspirant Peter Solomon Gichira, and issue him with their response on his eligibility to vie as an independent candidate within 36 hours.https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2001243785

It will succeed bcause there are no valid grounds for excluding him

"No warrior entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier." (2 Timothy 2:4)..

NASA has abandoned/vacated NOT withdrawn, time to withdraw had expired,that's now well articulated.

The ISSUE is, i) IF IEBC proceed with elections, there will still be problems, ii) if IEBC organizes itself, acts upon a formal NASA abandonment, declares Uhuru president-elect on the basis that he is the ONLY candidate, there will be still be problems.

What's happening is an attempt to "clip" "current incumbent" powers, in ways "the incumbent", is "indecisive"(read: campaigning) in dealing with current governing issues. It therefore becomes a national urgency that, what has to be done needs to be immediate and decisive.

It's clearly evident that the last bullet has been spent no need beating bushes about it.

Aukot’s application is likely to include him in the ballot. As it were,there is no clear reason why Maraga sent him to High Court while it entertained Chebu, yet both sought direction on SCOK’s pronouncements.

Now,
If Aukot is included, IEBC will proceed with the elections. This will immediately be challenged by NASA and will cause chaos among the usual suspects.

Grounds for challenging it
1. Whether paragraph 290 was obiter dicta or ratio decidendi....
2. If it was ratio whether withdrawal rules went against it
3

Pastor Bandia, why is Aukot's application likely to succeed? If you have a copy of his application and his arguments do share it. IEBC need not wait for Aukot. They can 1) Ask the Supreme Court for an advisory opinion 2) Go ahead with the election by letting Jakuon know that he is time barred (or has failed to follow withdrawal procedures) and let NASWA go to court

Aukot was contesting his exclusion by IEBC, in other words he was seeking a judgment. IEBC are seeking a clarification of a court ruling that issued a directive to Chebukati. They are not one and the same course of action. Do you not recall this case against IEBC? Matters of participation as a candidate need to be initiated at the High Court, not the Supreme Court.

The High court has ordered Independent Election and boundaries commission (IEBC) to receive documents of presidential aspirant Peter Solomon Gichira, and issue him with their response on his eligibility to vie as an independent candidate within 36 hours.https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2001243785

On this, it's a hard call. Agwambo stated clearly he's looking for a Win-win situation for all participants. I think that's an olive branch. He laid out a case for withdrawing and whether you think some have Merritt or not, it was curious he did not add security withdrawal which Kalonzo has been addressing lately. He has many directions to come up on any case on withdrawal. Looks like a compromise. But Agwambo has not not us what he'd do for the people if elected

Agwambo is looking for Mkate NUSU. We don't want compromises. We want the will of the people to be known through the ballot box. You Cannot intimidate people with violence. Kisumu is the one that will suffer the most

IEBC addressed NASWA's issues which may have accelerated Jakuon's purported withdrawal to beat the news of such an announcement. The cycle of endless repeat elections on account of the whims of a candidate has to be nipped in the bud. The Mativo ruling may trigger a complete new election and if Kenyans are lucky, a short postponement. The shortcomings of the 2010 constitution are coming to bear full circle.

NASA has abandoned/vacated NOT withdrawn, time to withdraw had expired,that's now well articulated.

The ISSUE is, i) IF IEBC proceed with elections, there will still be problems, ii) if IEBC organizes itself, acts upon a formal NASA abandonment, declares Uhuru president-elect on the basis that he is the ONLY candidate, there will be still be problems.

What's happening is an attempt to "clip" "current incumbent" powers, in ways "the incumbent", is "indecisive"(read: campaigning) in dealing with current governing issues. It therefore becomes a national urgency that, what has to be done needs to be immediate and decisive.

It's clearly evident that the last bullet has been spent no need beating bushes about it.

IEBC addressed NASWA's issues which may have accelerated Jakuon's purported withdrawal to beat the news of such an announcement. The cycle of endless repeat elections on account of the whims of a candidate has to be nipped in the bud. The Mativo ruling may trigger a complete new election and if Kenyans are lucky, a short postponement. The shortcomings of the 2010 constitution are coming to bear full circle.

NASA has abandoned/vacated NOT withdrawn, time to withdraw had expired,that's now well articulated.

The ISSUE is, i) IF IEBC proceed with elections, there will still be problems, ii) if IEBC organizes itself, acts upon a formal NASA abandonment, declares Uhuru president-elect on the basis that he is the ONLY candidate, there will be still be problems.

What's happening is an attempt to "clip" "current incumbent" powers, in ways "the incumbent", is "indecisive"(read: campaigning) in dealing with current governing issues. It therefore becomes a national urgency that, what has to be done needs to be immediate and decisive.

It's clearly evident that the last bullet has been spent no need beating bushes about it.