The Working Woman’s New Master

The careerist shrike is emblematic of social dissolution and sexual market atavism. Yet women have historically worked in some capacity, whether that was at home or in the fields. It’s a rare culture where the average woman lounges around all day while men and hand maidens provide her an endless stream of creature comforts.

The difference in this iteration of decivilization is the nature of the work occupying the energies and time of “modern” Western women (who are better categorized as premodern women aping the sub-Sahara African style of year-round female farming self-sustenance). “Working” women existed throughout European history, but the substance of their work and, more importantly, the people for whom they worked were markedly different than what we have now, distilled to its rotten essence in the manjawed, pulsing forehead-veined, tankgrrl lawyercunt.

A reader writes,

You said that “women are happier when they abide traditional sex roles.” That is very true, but most people do not know what the role of women was in unadulterated European society. Below is a link to The Moneychanger and his Wife, painted in 1539.

Notice the wife is working with her husband by making entries into the accounting book. Wives were usually expected to work in whatever trade the husband’s was. For example, a farmer’s wife did farming. This also included military ranks, for example the wife of an army count was a countess. Robert E. Lee’s wife was called “Mrs. General Lee.”

The wife was there to help her husband with his trade. Help would consist of cooking and making clothes so to free up his time, then any other time would be to work in that trade. In European civilization a husband and wife were considered partners. Often married couples would be hired as opposed to individuals. Ever notice the Queen sat next to the King?

Good point. Historians in the CH audience can attest to how widespread was the practice of European partnership-style marriage, where the wife’s role was employee to her husband-boss.

What the reader describes is a superior form of social system that redirects the natural female (of which “wife” is a subset) hypergamous instinct toward, instead of against, her husband. The working European woman of 1539 was working for her husband. Her lover and her comfort and her family was also her boss. In this arrangement it would be hard for her not to look up to him, and to admire him, and this admiration would translate quite easily into happy sexual submission. Her instinctual compulsion to surrender to a better man would be sated, and her marriage would thus be stronger.

What we have today is that same working-woman hypergamy now directed to powerful men who are not her husband. The modern wife leaves the world of her husband every morning to submit to sexy male rulers presiding over the parallel world she inhabits during the day. She still has a boss, but it’s no longer her husband. The temptation for her to cheat, either bodily or in mind, must be great. The male equivalent would be as if dutiful husbands were catered to on the job by a steady stream of swimsuit models. Even the firmest virtue will bend to perpetual succulent vice.

This is why I argue that feminist-inspired, female-aggrandizing public policies should be repealed. “Pro-woman” (aka pro-r-selection) policies like Title IX and mandated maternity leave create perverse incentives for a sub-Saharan female-forager style social system that channels natural female hypergamy toward company men and away from family men. Men — particularly men with little experience bedding women — have a hard time understanding this primal craving of women for higher status mates, because men don’t give a fig about female status. To help focus minds, recall what you as a man feel when a beautiful young woman poured into a slinky cocktail dress sits close to you and smiles. That’s what women feel in the presence of powerful male bosses commanding them to do their bidding.

Starting to feel a little nervous kissing your wife goodbye as she heads to work in the morning? You should. She’s doing something that most of her female ancestors never did.

“To help focus minds, recall what you as a man feel when a beautiful young woman poured into a slinky cocktail dress sits close to you and smiles. That’s what women feel in the presence of powerful male bosses commanding them to do their bidding.”

it’s weird looking at centuries-old writing that is so spot-on. we have such advanced technology, but such an inability to look honestly at ourselves. the activity of even studying sex differences or race differences is heavily repressed.

but then you pick up some old book from whoever, and they have insight into the female psyche that’s revolutionary today, but to them was just saying what they saw every day. we (as a society, not as individuals) actively and willfully refuse to admit what we could see if we looked today. pretty wild

They were allowed to speak truths back then. Today’s feminists and manboob pussies have shrieked and cried until the rest of us are reluctant to engage in any realtalk. It will be great when blogs like this one become more mainstream or even better, when American society stops being so damn pussified, short-sighted and illogical.

If anything, our advanced technology has made it more difficult to speak honestly about ourselves. Everyone has a voice, yet all the other subtle facets of human communication are lost. Most people aren’t even literate enough to make themselves understood in such an environment.

You can drop Bible passages on ’em, they’ll just pass you off as a religious nut. If they scoff at the Bard, the greatest living writer ever, they could try to scoff that he epitomizes bitter butthurt here. The answer is that bitterness fades, Truth is forever.

Alain Soral, in his subtitled clip on why Feminism is bullshit makes a salient point about how for every women with children that is in the workforce, another, lesser paid woman has to look after her children.

I prefer the model of Paleolithic man as compared to a lion family. This is a model that holds in many natural family structures, and it goes like this. The AMOG gets all teh women, and all he does is laze around all day while his bitches collect food and rear the young. His only tasks are fucking, eating, and killing other lions to maintain his AMOG status. Same goes with gorilla families. This is the basis of H.I.T. training, short burst of intense exertion “flexing those alpha muscles” followed by lots of sex, food and lounging in the glory of alpha mastery.

@ sentient, yes I agree with your post. But then of course there is solid research (tend and befriend) demonstrating the female hormone response to physical threat. Being forced to submit to male power is one of the most powerful pleasure inducing physical responses a woman ever experiences. Simulated rape caused huge release of oxytocin and dopamine. Not something your AFC betaman knows or would admit to. I remember the first time a HBB asked me to strangle her. I thought she was incredibly messed up in the head, but I did it. SInce then I realize that ALL women like this. I now thoroughly enjoy simulating rape, and it gets a physical reaction like nothing else does.

In my experience one man one woman only works on the long term if you apply dread. Which actually isn’t one man one woman. One man one woman is a unicorn.

“Females form strong relationships with males to gain mating opportunities and protection from predators and infanticidal outside males. However, aggressive behaviors between males and females do occur, but rarely lead to serious injury. Relationships between females may vary. Maternally related females in a troop tend to be friendly towards each other and associate closely. Otherwise, females have few friendly encounters and commonly act aggressively towards each other. Females may fight for social access to males and a male may intervene”

Agricultural societies rewarded military groups that could fight in lines of battle, all day, doing ugly killing like harvesting wheat. They routed tribal big man societies because they could decisively kill on the battlefield while their enemies could not: Egypt, Babylonia, Greece, Rome, Persia, Medieval Europe, Early Modern Europe, Napoleon, Russia, early British Empire. These were beta male empires of guys who killed like harvesting grain.

A lot of guys in the workplace can be real-life betas, but contextual alphas at work.

Simply by virtue of playing the situational lead, they can moisten panties while a woman’s imagination will fill in the holes (heh) for idealizing him outside the workplace …..even if he is nothing more than an average beta otherwise.

One of the PUA books (Nick Savoy’s?) made this point. Status is contextual, and sometimes hypergamy misleads women like a moth mistaking a lightbulb for the sun. E.g. a Denny’s manager bangs several of his hot waitresses — while out of context, in reality, they’re hot young chicks and he’s a fucking Denny’s manager.

Here is an observation that can only come from those hapless souls who have spent decades trying to eke out an existence on the corporate savannah :

Women are not only posited as co-equal co-competitors with handicaps thrown in to compensate for thousands of years of male oppression, they are also “proxy-competitors” by virtue of their ability to invoke the achievments or resources of any high-status male in their personal ecosystem, be it their husband, boyfriend, “team leader”, or CEO. While they wield this ruthlessly against one another in a no-quarters game of feminine intrigues, they especially relish tormenting hapless male rivals with these quick, destabilizing one-offs.

You may attend your inter-departmental pot-luck now. A Toastmasters enthusiast will use the occasion to share his inspirational speech, which was well received at their Saturday “early-risers” get-together.

….I recently was flummoxed at a pop culture message board where a comic book fan declared that the highly-toned bodies of comic book women reflect modern “empowered” women who are now free to have muscular bodies because they’re free from “culturally enforced 1950’s” ideas of feminine bodies. (The fool failed to mention the huge-tits and perfect hip-to-waist ratio of comic book women, no matter how muscular they’re drawn.) He actually argued that modern women look like the babes on old Heavy Metal covers, and that the women of the 1950’s were more plump and less athletic.

What struck me about his casual claim (which was heavily upvoted) was the casual belief that feminism has lead women to be more physically fit – albeit in a manly way. So, I went to the CDC and got the figures on female BMI by decade and, as all CH readers know, since the 1950s, the female body has dramatically regressed from the comic book grrrl body championing.

This got me also thinking about the insane amounts of psychotropic drugs liberated women need. I have many friends and family who work in Chicago’s corporate downtown, and they all note that their female colleagues are hopped up on meds just to get through the day. 25% of American women need psychiatric drugs (and this is from 2011; it’s likely higher)

Then, of course, there is life’s one and only purpose from a scientific perspective: procreation. Genetic success. Evolution. When arguments are getting torturous, when data is getting suspect, when resolve is getting foggy….one can always cut right to the chase and look at matters scientifically. So, has the USA and feminism yielded evolutionary success for their charges?

lol. And that includes blacks and mestizos. If white women were isolated, their fertility has plummeted even more. (And there are even more dire signs: old white women using in vitro to have their lone trophy baby are “impregnated” by weak sperm which did not prove their virility by swimming up to the ovum. Thus there are increasing numbers of deformities and other disorders with the children born to modern white women).

So, you have unhealthy, miserable, evolutionary failures. The only criteria by which feminism could be said to be a success would be that it has given corporate America one and a half generations of a aging female workers. But even they are aging out.

“The only criteria by which feminism could be said to be a success would be that it has given corporate America one and a half generations of a aging female workers.”

It could also be considered a success by a tiny elite minority that wanted to see the destruction of western civilization. Being as it is that a family is the most basic nucleus of civilization, what better way to take civilization down then to destroy the family unit. It’s actually a brilliant strategy if you want to concentrate all power and resources into the hands of a few.

Ha ha. Grrrl powr! Free to waste money getting addicted to nicotine and hurting your health. (That dude is lying, BTW, at the part where he says people didn’t know smoking was unhealthy. My dad was in the Army in the 1960’s and they discouraged it for anybody who wanted to go into the special forces even back then. So that dude is basically bragging that he killed women. Good job!)

Eh…. I think you missed the irony in his tone and his use of the same “Wall Of Defense” la-la-la-can’t-hear-you so often employed by our friends of the Judaic-Hebraic persuasion when it comes to Israel.

Pardon my misreading then… it’s rare, especially at the chateau, to find someone manfully defend Israel de facto existence, yet call the Jews out on their other bullshit when it comes to upending other nations.

Since feminism dates back to the 70s … 1770s, and Christian aristocratic women like Mary Wollstonecroft and very Christian men like William Blake, subsidized by Wollstonecroft, massive fail. Feminism is the natural outgrowth of Christianity and in particular utopianism, heaven on earth, free love, anti-nuclear family (the Oneidans that Christian splinter group outlawed the family in the 1830s). Hint: history happened before 1980.

No one “fooled” women into wanting stuff they didn’t want, otherwise beta males would be rolling in pussy.

No he’s not necessarily lying,. That’s Edward Bernays, and his campaign to liberate women with cigarettes happened on Easter 1929. Bernays shaped society in ways unimaginable. He ushered in feminism almost single handedly.

In fact, it seems like common sense: people studying athletic performance for Olympic athletes would know, and I’m sure the data was shared. It’s just common sense that inhaling smoke into your lungs is not a good thing.

(I should note that, personally, I believe that smoking, while not healthy, is not nearly as harmful as it’s widely believed to be today. When confounding variables are adjusted, it seems to have an appreciable but not enormous harmful effect. That’s just my opinion after studying the matter. I smoked a pack a day throughout my twenties.)

Interesting how my point repeatedly escapes you. Bernays stated the date that the government warned against the health impacts of smoking, that’s all he said. And who cares, I have no doubt the guy is a pathological liar. The point is that he used psychological manipulation in a way never before done. Not by Marlboro, not by anyone. He single handedly liberated women from male social dominance in a profound way. In many ways. The cigarette campaign was just one amazingly effective way that he altered public perception of sex roles and he didn’t do it altruistically.

Evolution, much like hypergamy, doesn’t give a shit about nobility or moral assumptions on what’s correct. For women, it unapologetically filters for the best man (justified perceptually at times) and that’s how it works.

While r and K selection is adaptive, you simply can’t control the times we live in today. Nothing short of an apocalyptic catastrophic event will change the sexual market landscape. It’s far too gone right now into the r selection territory.

Women have now hit the evolutionary jackpot by having their beta cuckold husbands provide for them while he records some alpha stud banging her on video. This satisfies her dualistic sexual nature.

It seems like currently, women can have their cake and eat it too. They won’t have it any other way unless something drastic happens.

It’s interesting to note that, while seemingly evil, their dualistic strategy is completely natural and it’s the outside forces of culture and society which hender it from fully manifesting itself.

1969. The year we (men) put men on the moon. Women as a group have no desire to build such machines. I have more to say but I’m typing on android and I’m sure most here understand my larger (heh) point.

No. He is much less famous than her. Nerdy-looking too. They married in 2009, so he got her for 5 years of her looks, even if her looks decline from here.

This is a major example of the effectiveness of Game, but bad news for those who care about white purity. These two goals are often in conflict (colored guys aiming for white women are often the biggest beneficiaries of Game).

Who really gives half a rats ass about celebrity whoreshit? Acknowledging their influence, or even existence, just provides them free fuel. They get enough free shit. Paid millions of dollars for a ‘job’ that you know they would do for fifty thousand dollars per year. I’m talking, of course, about actors. Athletes too.

he does look pretty white. his mother is pakistani and his father is German, Scottish, and Irish (wikipedia). their kids will most likely look even lighter than him.

i think you guys that worry about keeping the white lines pure might be looking at it all wrong. with all those white genes and a white mother to give birth to his children those pakistani genes will be almost invisible after a couple generations. especially if the kids end up with or whitish partners too.

if christina hendricks does have children, she’ll actually be doing you anti-brown guys a favor. essentially she’d be creating more white people for you AND eliminating the possibility of more brown children which is what would have happened if he’d mated up with someone less white than her.

Paki’s aren’t really black. They’re Asian, really, with (like the Afgans) more than a pinch of Armenian/Greek, via Alexander the Great.
Pakistan built a serviceable atom bomb. I rather doubt most African nations (possibly pre Mandela SA, which proves my point) have a lot of engineers, physicists, etc. Building an atom bomb takes serious brains, brains that Iran and North Korea even lack.
Their culture is still fairly tribal, but they’re also fairly modern in a lot of ways – roads, banks, computers – & infrastructure that generally only Western nations have.
They’re not at all our allies, but Botswana they are not. Plus, quite a few of them adore the Brits, and will sometimes ape the more appealling Britishisms.
Many of them high tail it to Wall St, Silicon Valley, or American med schools, where they’re absorbed into our SWPL classes (much like Indians or Chinese).
On the whole, they’re not THAT bad. Plus they generally keep their females from getting out of line. Probably thats why what’s her face married one – a bit of brains, a bit of exotic brown, and a bit of the pimp hand when required.

Much is made of the lower rates of divorce among the assertively-mated cognitive elite.

Much less is made of the nature of those enduring marriages — which in my experience (NW Washington DC; NYC) endure because the ‘men’ are content to being their wives’ domesticated object of bemused contempt. They never let their husbands forget that they know wealthier, more attractive, more ‘powerful’ men, in the office, at the private schools, in the neighborhood. Or that their intimacies are grist for conversation with their female friends.

Buenavista – that is more down to the nature of these “men”. Pure beta, many Jewish, who feel lucky to have any pussy. Believe me there are a large number of non beta men in these UMC/UC marriages who rule the roost… Lot’s of sugarpants honeypots late 20’s who are gunning for an audition to be #2 wife… and these wives know it.

My wife said to me, I guess if something happened with you I would have to go out and get a 60 YO… I cracked up. She is 5’7″ Hollywood pretty, size 0 26 inch jeans… at 46 YO. she knows the road for her is older and flabbier guys taking Vitamin “C” and the road for me is 7’s, 8’s and 9’s 25-30 without much effort.

older and flabbier but that’s alright for most women. they don’t care about appearance as much as we do so to her, an older more established man is as much of a step up for her as a younger, prettier woman is for you. it’s all relative.

it’s a little comical how all the guys on here laugh about how older women are disadvantaged because they can’t get anything but an older man and then they contradict themselves by saying that they can get all the young girls they want well into old age because women like older men.

which is it? women like and want older men, or they don’t?

[CH: youth and beauty are stronger triggers of men’s sexual arousal than they are of women’s.

“youth and beauty are stronger triggers of men’s sexual arousal than they are of women’s.”

i agree. i don’t think i was clear in what i was trying to say.

my point was…

all women…of any age care less about the age and appearance of a their mate than men do. in fact they usually prefer older men.

what i was saying is that this guy is foolish to think his wife would be suffering somehow if she had to go older in a mate. he’s projecting his preference for youth and beauty onto her.

she might be giving him some flak about it but he needs to take what she says with a grain of salt. an older more established man to her (and most other women) is equivalent to a hot young babe to him.

if he can get younger women because they don’t care about age and beauty, it stands to reason that she, like all women, will be attracted to older men as well.

my point was to say that he shouldn’t be complacent about it. he needs to think more like a woman. he is at as much risk of his wife leaving him for an older more established man as she is of him leaving her for a younger hotter chick.

Dudes…bang chicks and if you feel like you wanna get in a relationship just keep her at arms length and let it ride for a little, enjoy the perks but invest very little…damn near nothing. Don’t buy em cars or shack up or let em use your credit cards and shit…just know the good part doesn’t last maybe 2 yrs tops nowadays. Eventually the best modern girls will start getting bored or ride your ass for not putting a ring on it..shitty tantrum ultimatums 2x a week, fuck that noise.

too much social media, TV to keep em on the hook indefinitely. Dudes who say “nu uh..I’ve been happily married for 12 years.” Dude, don’t even start with it either..you know who you are, get in the dating game NOW and say that. Shit has changed in 5 years. Every motherfuckin dude I know in my professional career that was retarded enough to get married has a fat turd wife. Every hot girl from HS…fat. Every hot girl I knew in college by 28…fat. Girls you would never believe. Fuck the girl who cuts my hair, came back to the shop after 2 yrs workin away at another store downtown..gained like 40 lbs. I used to lust for that ass. Odds are stacked bros.

Snapchat, tinder, twitter, facebook, platitude quote picture memes for propaganda, kik, POF, okcupid, match.com, fuck it goes on for days…the market for slutting around has exploded in very short time.

They all “Love their job, friends, and hanging out” more than they will every love making a home with you..don’t forget that.

“Snapchat, tinder, twitter, facebook, platitude quote picture memes for propaganda, kik, POF, okcupid, match.com, fuck it goes on for days…the market for slutting around has exploded in very short time.”

Yep. In 5 years.

Though modern feminism is awful, the deepest cuts to the institution of marriage are actually being made by the little devices that we all carry around in our pockets.

Modern women defend their office with all the fierceness of domesticity. They fight for desk and typewriter as for hearth and home, and develop a sort of wolfish wifehood on behalf of the invisible head of the firm. That is why they do office work so well; and that is why they ought not to do it.

…

There is a plutocratic assumption behind the phrase “Why should woman be economically dependent upon man?” The answer is that among poor and practical people she isn’t; except in the sense in which he is dependent upon her. A hunter has to tear his clothes; there must be somebody to mend them. A fisher has to catch fish; there must be somebody to cook them. It is surely quite clear that this modern notion that woman is a mere “pretty clinging parasite,” “a plaything,” etc., arose through the somber contemplation of some rich banking family, in which the banker, at least, went to the city and pretended to do something, while the banker’s wife went to the Park and did not pretend to do anything at all. A poor man and his wife are a business partnership. If one partner in a firm of publishers interviews the authors while the other interviews the clerks, is one of them economically dependent? Was Hodder a pretty parasite clinging to Stoughton? Was Marshall a mere plaything for Snelgrove?

A better message would be to work on your side-business when you’re not working for that “your middle-aged, insecure, fat, desperate-for-attention female boss” so you can free yourself from slavery to a corporate master. Stack your paper until you can transition from a wage-slave to becoming your own master and your work life will be much, much easier…

You must understand that the employers are women’s true husbands these days if they are successful and the government welfare are the true husband of the less successful women. Human men are no longer true husbands in any real sense of the word. All marriage is today is a licensed boyfriend-girlfriend relationship in which the man takes most if not all the risks while getting little to no benefits while the women take little to no risk and benefit greatly. True marriage depended on men providing and protecting their wives in exchange for sex and children. Since true marriage does not exist anymore except in name and mockery only, it would behoove men to avoid modern day marriage in the USA and many other countries. Entering marriage for an American man and other nationalities ‘ men is a fool’s mission for why would any man want to submit to a woman as a slave or KITCHEN BITCH PIG FUCKER while she manages the human male husband for her true master and husband, her employer and the government run by our ruling elite. Our ruling elite want women to be the formen(forwomen) of the men because someone has to do the dirty work of ruling over the more rebellious on average in nature slaves, the men. Women are more obedient and trustworthy slaves on average so the ruling elite through their government and employers do this. I suggest you all read http://www.maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2010/07/18/176 on Maggie McNeill’s blog for an excellent description of what is going on now with marriage. I almost thought Heartiste was writing it, and it is that good. It is why Omega men are hated because they can not or less likely will not be able to support the better liked slaves, women through, marriage, divorce, alimony and child support. It is the same reason why Alphas such as Heartiste, Krauser, and Roosh are hated because they pump, dump and next women without becoming tied down especially in marriage. It is why GAME is hated as it teaches men to bed women without marriage if they want and to control their women better despite the culture, laws and people trying to have women control men. Betas are what our ruling elite, government, laws, culture, feminists want more than anything because they are able to provide women through direct payments inside marriage or through alimony and childsupport in divorce while always payng taxes for the poor women to get government handouts, but there are fewer and fewer of them as time goes on as more men either become Alphas who pump, dump and next or Omegas who never had a chance in the first place.

Not only has he snagged and married Paulina Gretzky, but he’s sleeping with the WAGS of PGA Touring Pros. And a Google Image search of “Dustin Johnson Girlfriend” reveals many beautiful women in his past.

Do we have an actual Alpha among the Beta Men of Pro Golf? A guy with game, fame, and surrounded by hypergamous gold-digging trophy wives of boring betas?

The same Image search will reveal that Dustin is not even that particularly good-looking of a man. Some pics he looks better than others. But overall it shows that it is his attitude and game (not golf) that is drawing in not only the narcissist Alphabitches like Gretzky to be close to him, but the other WAGS as well.

It is a basic point, but worth making: before just a few years ago, these sort of jobs-for-women DID NOT EXIST. Indoor, air conditioned, no muscle jobs were nowhere to be found before the 1950s.
My saintly grand mother raised a large passel of kids in a muddy gulch deep in the Apalachian Wilderness. She cooked on a wood stove, etc. and lustfully awaited the return from work of her Husband the lumber-man. (he owned the lumber-mill, but the point stands).
The only out of the home jobs in that time and place were 1. Digging coal underground 2. Cutting trees and sawing them up. That was it. Pick one. Being a stay at home- tending the fireside Mom was irresistably attractive in comparison.
Have a look at Reality as was experienced by our fore-bearers.

Now we have Federal workers sitting in air conditioned offices, sitting on $1000 ergonomic office chairs, getting paid to watch porn.

I should say, getting overpaid to watch porn. $80,000+ per year plus gold-plated benefits, ridiculous amounts of vacation and ludicrous pension plans funded by those who actually produce goods and services for a living.

And Democrats, the little brain-dead imbeciles they are, actually crave bigger government. I had one die-hard Dem tell me with a straight face, that she believes there is no waste in government. This is what we’re dealing with.

Slightly off topic: Doctors who supposedly understood the risks of exposure to Ebola are starting to die of it. This is a massive fact to those in the Know because Medical People have a finely tuned sense of self preservation.
I should not finish these thoughts…

It looks like in native american society the women did almost all the normal work. Probably a bit like lions where the male doesnt do much..but then he risks his life when he has to fight off the hyenas so thats probably the trade off.

At a previous job, there was a male manager all the women talked about constantly. I frequently compared myself to this guy, and never could figure out what he had that I didn’t. He’s not ugly, but he’s not gorgeous. He’s taller, but not tall. He’s in a bit better shape, but still paunchy. I couldn’t see any reason why he had 1,000 times more attention from females than I did, but I sure do now. It’s a combination of his status within the work environment and his cocky confidence. That dude is chick crack, and pretty much every old hag in the place, including my own wife, would fuck that guy in a second given half a chance. Much ado is made about this fellow.

So I happened to be present one day when a smoking hot 19 year old beauty proclaimed to this gentleman, “If you and I were the last two people on earth, we could repopulate the planet.”

Guess who ended up in a big shit storm over cheating on his wife and fucking one of the hourly employees? If you think it was this guy, you’re totally wrong, because this guy skated out of the situation with a slap on the wrist. They transferred the girl to a different location so he could keep fucking her, and now that these events are several years in the past, he’s still with the same wife he had back then. No, the guy who got canned for fucking an employee was more of a quiet and reserved manager who fucked some married middle aged chick who was barely bang worthy.

I think having witnessed this phenomenon first hand is one of the reasons why I instantly accepted the idea of female hypergamy. The alpha manager had fewer options at the hot and gorgeous end of the spectrum, but he had so many options overall that a hot and gorgeous chick literally threw totally free effortless pussy at him. The beta manager had to work harder to get a bland chick, but she probably looked a lot better to a guy his age than mine, and she wanted that situationally alpha dick enough to cheat on a husband she used to natter about constantly.

A woman in the workplace is faithful only so long as no attractive male managers actively want to fuck her. The only real way to mitigate this is to be more alpha to her than the most alpha manager she can fuck, which can come about in a variety of ways.

My marriage is secure, because while my wife would cheat on me in 15/32 of a nanosecond if she got a chance to nail the alpha manager, that guy’s dumping out wife is still way prettier than mine, and he pulled gorgeous 19 year old ass without even trying. He wouldn’t fuck my wife for less than $10,000, I don’t imagine.

Having a fat wife is hardly a good way to achieve such security, but it must be a lot easier than trying to hold down a HB10.

I totally agree that fucking the HB10 one time is better than decades of an insipid and soul-crushing marriage. My point was that the chances of nailing down the upwardly mobile and career-minded HB10 are virtually zilch, so there’s no use trying. Hit it and quit it, because you’ll never keep it in your pocket anyway. Nobody ever will.

You could probably marry the HB10 if you made a housewife out of her. Let her work, and you’re doomed. In today’s America, most guys won’t have a choice in this.

I worked with a dude that had so many women on his jock it would make your guy look like Urkel. He had different women sending him videos of themselves dancing naked or masterbating damn near every other day. He banged about a third of the girls in the office that I know about, around 15-20 women, one I know was married offered him a blow job, another was engaged and fucked him only once because she was virtuous. He would tell me these women would send him naked pics or videos and he wouldn’t even ask them too! I know for a fact that he wasn’t lying because I saw the physical change that would come over women when they were in his presence and saw my coworkers stripping for him on his phone. They would openly declare one after another how hawt and sexy he was and one told me any woman who didn’t want him was a lesbian. My favorite story of all was when a girl called him into her office one day and asked him to reach in her pocket to take out her phone for her, he did as he was told and while his hand was there she put her hand on top and proceeded to rub her crotch with it. There was story after story and he said that he could have fucked any of the women that were married but had respect for the husbands in some cases so didn’t. I had never witnessed this type of monkey behavior before and never would have believed that women were capable of this if I didn’t see it with my own eyes. I quickly understood why Muslim culture puts women in birkahs.

Here’s a question: At work my wife *is* the boss, and she reports (remotely) to a woman. Does that mean that any interloping males in her immediate workplace are automatically neutered, being her underlings? (Of course, she still interacts externally with men she considers high-status.)

I’m as African as you are ”white”. This matriarchy you people think exists for African women on this side of the world is another myth made up by western feminists to make as if that ever worked.
I’d be surprised that any of you fell for that load of crap, but aside of being pathologically altruistic, your people tend to be woefully naive with regard to people with fancy letters after their names.
You’re letting crackpot women’s studies graduates tell you what is African culture for 7/8 of the continent wherein a woman usually has to pay back her bride price to get a divorce? Really?

Nicole, I’m assuming you’re a black American. Just like I’m a white American. My family tree’s made up of a whole random set of nationalities via immigration, plus a few Native Americans thrown into the mix. Your family tree is more than likely to be heterogeneous in the same way. The thing we share is American culture, which pervades every fiber of you being, whether you realize it or not.

I do not call myself “European,” because I’m not. You are not African, because you are not.

Cynthia, you are welcome to your ignorance, but I am under no obligation to indulge it. It doesn’t matter to me that you are to ashamed of your family’s history to bother to keep crucial elements of your European-ness, but I am not joining any multikults today. In my opinon, this is how these lies like African cultures being matriarchal get started. The new ethnicity, new masculinity, new meanings for everything. Now thefeminists decide that if there is a matrilineal line of priesthood in some cases, the whole region is matriarchal, and you go along just so that something else you did to yourselves can be blamed on us.

Nicole.. Nicole. You want to show yur tits off (to some of us of at least) How about you flash for 10-12 seconds around midnite on a random Thursday night? That way, the Lords of Karma will command that only those of us meant to enjoy the scene will be there for it.
I have done worse things with my Skype Application…

Sorry, Rum, but this generation missed the train chasing independent bitches who took half. It is not my place to soften the consequences of their shitty decisions, any more than it is the job of men to marry single moms.

No question that Feminist America is modeled on the matriarchal (un)structure of Africa. This piece expressed and expanded that in a unique and helpful way. It’ll work out for the U.S. about like it has for the Dark Continent. But then of course I’m just a hateful ray-shist. Cheers

If I could find a husband that would work hard in order to provide, that I know wouldn’t cheat down the road (so that I’m not left without anything if he divorces me) I would love to help with his work, support him, stay at home with kids, make myself pretty every day…whatever need be. However, since I have no guarantees I prefer to be independent.
Also, an example. When I was 12 my dad died. My mom is a judge and my dad, when I was little, wanted her to stop working and just stay at home. She preffered not to since my grandparents lived very close and could help whenever needed. If she stopped working we would have been pretty much screwed when he died (because he also had an ex wife that wanted half of everything he created with my mom…long story). Anyways…

Hope that clarifies why I, as a woman, want to work and do my own thing. Even though, again, I’d prefer to enjoy with the kids, cook and wear sexy little outfits for when he comes home.

There are still a ton of great, family-minded men out there, who will work their asses off to make it a one-paycheck home. Who says there aren’t? Some of them might take a little while to get used to the idea, because that’s not the way they were raised, not what our society believes in any more, but they’re still out there. It’s on the woman in that situation to be a wife, of course, but…

If you’re worried about having a source of income in case of an emergency, there are a lot of good work-at-home options these days too.

The problem isn’t really finding a man willing to work and provide, but finding one who makes enough to support the lifestyle to which you are accustomed, or that you wish for. You don’t want to settle for one who doesn’t make whatever it is you feel is enough. I get that.

Just understand that your standards may be unrealistically high if you are basing them on your income rather than your feminine qualities. An accomplished man is not looking for someone who is going to be or who wants to be away from the home as much as he is. He also wants to come home to a place where he is welcomed and nurtured and someone cares about his needs and his pleasures.

If you make it clear that this is you, then you’ll have no problem finding men who qualify. It will be a matter of choosing the one who fits you best.

So essentially women have been fulfilling a role quite similar to that of a personal assistant or a secretary for their husbands throughout much of history, yet people still wonder why in modern day men tend to primarily take secretaries as their mistresses.

More examples of hypergamy at work. I’ve mentioned that I’m a mid fifties consultant who moves all over the place. At this one hotel there was a manager’s cocktail reception and the sales staff were there mixing with the guests. One slim, mid 20s exec who looked even younger sat listening to me the whole evening and then texted me the next day about how my ideas were so brash yet so insightful, etc. She sent me an FB request but I ignored it though I saw she had posted that she met someone the night before (moi) with really exciting and wonderful ideas. Last couple of days she sent me long texts about how she was thinking over my work and all I had to say and had even told them to her husband (ha ha), etc. They troubled her but she couldn’t stop thinking about them, etc. Lots more words. She was so busy but she had no time to chat, etc. Very long texts from her. Then I simply responded. “Meet me at 4 today.” Her: “Ok. :)”

what women should aspire, not some BS middle office paper pushing job….

Epilogue: The Wife of Noble Character
10 [b]A wife of noble character who can find?
She is worth far more than rubies.
11 Her husband has full confidence in her
and lacks nothing of value.
12 She brings him good, not harm,
all the days of her life.
13 She selects wool and flax
and works with eager hands.
14 She is like the merchant ships,
bringing her food from afar.
15 She gets up while it is still night;
she provides food for her family
and portions for her female servants.
16 She considers a field and buys it;
out of her earnings she plants a vineyard.
17 She sets about her work vigorously;
her arms are strong for her tasks.
18 She sees that her trading is profitable,
and her lamp does not go out at night.
19 In her hand she holds the distaff
and grasps the spindle with her fingers.
20 She opens her arms to the poor
and extends her hands to the needy.
21 When it snows, she has no fear for her household;
for all of them are clothed in scarlet.
22 She makes coverings for her bed;
she is clothed in fine linen and purple.
23 Her husband is respected at the city gate,
where he takes his seat among the elders of the land.
24 She makes linen garments and sells them,
and supplies the merchants with sashes.
25 She is clothed with strength and dignity;
she can laugh at the days to come.
26 She speaks with wisdom,
and faithful instruction is on her tongue.
27 She watches over the affairs of her household
and does not eat the bread of idleness.
28 Her children arise and call her blessed;
her husband also, and he praises her:
29 “Many women do noble things,
but you surpass them all.”
30 Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting;
but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised.
31 Honor her for all that her hands have done,
and let her works bring her praise at the city gate.

I been saying that shit like it is ALWAYS ok for a company or boss to tell a bitch what to do but never ok for the husband to tell her what to do that in controlling her no no no

what I did was get the wife to start businesses and she is the boss of that and i’m the boss of her he he he
yea then she has no real time she has to be there except during really important time and not to many of those keeps it easy breezy
another one I think would be overseeing rentals not a bad job for a bitch probably
but yea think about how mcds an get a bitch to clean up strangers shit of the bathroom floor and hve no problem ordering your chicky around when she sys your being controlling be like ahh yea anyway so go ahead nd get to work
I think posting a schedule and owning every second of the day like work does is prob not going to far but yea I don’t like to micromanage

another thing about todays work is how many jobs that woman get there degree for do the woman work for free in the hope of one day getting paid
so you also have your chick being like a wife to a company but not even getting resources
now those companies that get em to work for nothing and don’t give em shit are worse than even the skittles man he he he
and usually young woman doing it right learn from that I wreckin

but yea all the chicks trying out lesbian and only one in 100 saying lesbian yea tv media is definitely having an affect
every movie guys drooling going insane like a cartoon over some fugly lesbo bitch

You guys do realize that most of the money changers in medieval Europe were Jewish, right?
Cue shibboleth, shiv, goyim, shiksa,etc.
Some Italians, too, since the northern Italian city states had most of the money back then.

As far as “professional” Australian women go, one of the pastimes or hobbies of choice seems to be travel and international travel in particular seems to be a badge of honour and achievement.
Online dating profiles of these women are replete with descriptions about how much they luuurve travel and where they have been.
Some points need to be made about this phenomenon.

– Travel, particularly to and from Australia isn’t cheap. I expect that these women’s credit cards and bank balances take a regular beating.
Most of them are probably hoping to meet some chump that can allow them to live and travel in the manner that they are accustomed to.
After all, every Australian woman is an entitled princess.

– “What happens on holidays, stays on holidays”; lord knows how much cock hopping these women engage in while away from judging eyes.

– The traveller, with tourist dollars gets attention and is made to feel important.
The traveller with tourist dollars and a bangable twat is made to feel even more important. Cue the spinning of the hamsters.

– Travel seldom makes a woman more interesting. It does give entitlement princess a bunch of stories to tell to anyone that gives a crap.

Based on my experiences, there seem to be 2 very different types of Aussie travelers. Most of the ones I met in Europe were easily among the coolest people, party animals, world champion backpackers anyone could hope to meet.
In the US, you get more of the combative asshole with huge chips on both shoulders who seem to have something to prove at every turn type.
Both male and female.
I remember a Prudence from Melbourne who had trekked it overland from Malaysia, allegedly left a Prince boyfriend in the mountains of northern India, battled her way through Iran and Turkey – this is in the late 80’s – and had more visas in her passport than most diplomats.
She was pretty ugly – the Indian Prince was probably more focused on the fact that he was nailing a White girl than her actual looks – but quite the character and super fun to talk to, almost like a character out of an Agatha Christie novel, you could easily see her as a Victorian era suffragette adventurer.

As far as Australians go. What you tend to find is that Aussies from the country or regional areas tend to be FAR nicer, friendlier, more down to earth and salt of the earth type people.
Aussie women that were born and grew up in the major cities like Melbourne and Sydney tend to be the combative asshole types with huge chips on both shoulders who seem to have something to prove at every turn type.
As a contrast to such Aussie women, ask any Aussie male what their experiences with American women have been like.
I am willing to bet that most Aussie men find most American women friendly and engaging compared to the Aussie women I describe above.

I’m sure that’s true. There are, in fact, many American girls who stay in things like hostels specifically to get screwed by Australian guys (thinking of them as ‘Crocodile Dundee’ type Outback roughnecks, even if they’re not), so no surprise that the Aussie guys find Yank grrrls very ‘open’.

A point to be considered about the growing female workforce: the office or studio becomes a potential harem for “alpha” CEOs. All those single women in cubicles looking for an escape up and out? Womyn being females, they will gravitate to the exec in the corner office. Meanwhile, their male co-workers can be kept out of the competition via “sexual harassment” repression. And “male” feminists will congratulate themselves on the “equality” of the workforce from the sanctity of their parent’s basements.