In light of this Court's Order granting Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Third Party Complaint (Document 68), the parties, Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and Defendants Richard Varrasso, Premier Valley Inc. dba Century 21 M&M Associates, and Karen Bhatti by and through their counsel of record or personally hereby stipulate and agree to modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order.

While the Third Party Defendants have not yet appeared in this matter, the 4 deadlines have arrived to disclose experts and rebuttal experts (November 30 and 5 December 31, 2012, respectively). Given that the scope of the information for 6 expert investigation and opinion will increase with the appearance of the third 7 party defendants and that the parties wish to complete additional discovery 8 before finalizing expert reports, the parties wish to extend the disclosure 9 deadlines until after the third party defendants have appeared and the Court has an opportunity to more thoroughly revisit the scheduling order. Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the deadline to disclose experts be extended until January 31, 2013 for initial disclosure and February 28, 2013 for rebuttal.

No other provision of the Pretrial Scheduling Order is to be modified at this time.

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.