First of all, that's an interesting interpretation of the role of government. If that's accurate, after 10+ years of trying to "slay Al-Qaeda," and slaying perhaps 1.5 million other people and the American economy and our very social fabric in the process, is it perhaps time to acknowledge the government has FAILED, Mr. Zelikow?

And then there's this -- "We tried to make 9/11 a grand narrative, but it's not." Huh? We? Who's "We"? The media, educators, people in general, refer regularly to the "post-9/11 world," yet it's not become grand enough, in this megalomaniac's mind. Zelikow's novel sold a gazillion copies, became the "approved" version of directed history, entire governmental departments were formed as a response, every thing about US life changed as a result, the military-industrial-security-prison complex budget blew sky-high, US tourism industry estimates it lost $600 billion as an outcome of society's "resilience against systematic threats" and now 175 cities have citizens occupying public spaces in the cold as a response. How much grander a narrative could he have penned? Methinks Mr. Zelikow should check with Mr. Brzezinski as to whether his bestseller became a "grand narrative." On the 21st century's Global Chessboard, this move certainly seems to have created a "check," for the moment. Perhaps thus his angst ... it's only check -- not checkmate." />

First of all, that's an interesting interpretation of the role of government. If that's accurate, after 10+ years of trying to "slay Al-Qaeda," and slaying perhaps 1.5 million other people and the American economy and our very social fabric in the process, is it perhaps time to acknowledge the government has FAILED, Mr. Zelikow?

And then there's this -- "We tried to make 9/11 a grand narrative, but it's not." Huh? We? Who's "We"? The media, educators, people in general, refer regularly to the "post-9/11 world," yet it's not become grand enough, in this megalomaniac's mind. Zelikow's novel sold a gazillion copies, became the "approved" version of directed history, entire governmental departments were formed as a response, every thing about US life changed as a result, the military-industrial-security-prison complex budget blew sky-high, US tourism industry estimates it lost $600 billion as an outcome of society's "resilience against systematic threats" and now 175 cities have citizens occupying public spaces in the cold as a response. How much grander a narrative could he have penned? Methinks Mr. Zelikow should check with Mr. Brzezinski as to whether his bestseller became a "grand narrative." On the 21st century's Global Chessboard, this move certainly seems to have created a "check," for the moment. Perhaps thus his angst ... it's only check -- not checkmate.

As the crowd of students, professors and Houstonians brushed off the cold, Philip Zelikow stepped to the podium in The Honors College Commons on Thursday to discuss the US government's defense against terrorism.
Zelikow, the executive director of the 9/11 Commission, an executive on the President Intelligence Advisory Board and a history professor at the University of Virginia, focused his lecture, "The Twilight of War," on America's resiliency and his experience with the horrific events of 9/11.
"It's my job to make meaning of 9/11," Zelikow said.
During the lecture, Zelikow spoke of his personal experiences on the scene during Sept. 11.
"I can still smell the sulfur, it stands out," Zelikow said. "It was as if the terrorist opened up a special path to hell."
"After the attack, the event entered popular culture," Zelikow said. "9/11 opened up our eyes to zealousy."
In the days following the attack, President Bush labeled Osama bin Laden as America's enemy and the ringleader of 9/11.
"I disagreed with President Bush when he openly pointed the finger at bin Laden," Zelikow said.
"It made Osama glorious and that's what he wanted, to be glorified. These people think we are important and they develop complexes about us, so for our President to recognize one of them was a big deal."
Since Sept. 11, officials have charged Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in connection with the attack, labeling him as the mastermind. Mohammed is being held in Guantanamo Bay for alleged acts of terrorism.
"Bin Laden was a pinnacle for fantasist, like Mohammed -- who identify with a creed vs. a nation," Zelikow said.
"Once bin Laden said, 'lives would become true and meaningful at the explosive moment of the deed,' fantasists began to plot."
Zelikow placed emphasis on these fantasists and said they were the cause of Sept. 11.
"They were a group of young people, 20 to 30 of them," Zelikow said. "We tried to make 9/11 a grand narrative, but it's not. It was a group of alienated young people."
According to Zelikow, a graduate of the UH Law School, our government has become reactionary rather than proactive.
"The measure of a government is how it handles failure," Zelikow said.
"Culturally we defend and adapt to failure."
Though fears of an attack have diminished, Zelikow insisted that contemporary society will remain vulnerable.
"We are still vulnerable," Zelikow said. "We need to be resilient as a society against systematic threats."
The National Transportation Safety Board is a government organization built to examine the systematic threats and to manage risks. According to Zelikow, risk management is our government's principle function.
"This organization represents thought and earned trust," Zelikow said. "Its sole purpose is to explain what went wrong and why."
As the hour lecture drew to an end, Professor Zelikow's voice was still strong.
"Al-Qaeda is the enemy," Zelikow said. "They are an unslayable power."
news@thedailycougar.com

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content,
and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will
not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements
contained in this article.

Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political
issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe
this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
"fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.