Pandagon is daily opinion blog covering feminism, politics, and pop culture. Come for the politics, stay for the complete lack of patience for the B.S. and bad faith coming from conservative leaders and pundits.

NOM board member advocates criminalization of homosexuality, overthrow of government

The folks at the National Organization for Marriage are quickly earning a reputation as an incompetent, delusional organization ill-prepared to handle defending “traditional marriage.”

I mean come on — all these people have managed to do is make their cause look absurd at this point. NOM produced a widely derided and parodied “Gathering Storm” ad, let loose its diva of discrimination Maggie Gallagher on the air to do an ace job of serial lying and playing a bigoted bully as a talking head, and with today’s ad and ridiculous press conference with Miss Pageant-Paid-for Fake Jugs for Jesus California, NOM is further marginalizing itself.

But it gets worse. NOM claims it doesn’t hate the gays, but on its board it has a real live wire. People For the American Way President Michael Keegan:

“If the National Organization for Marriage wants to make the comments of a gossip columnist and a beauty queen the subject of a national debate, then it should answer for the bizarre and troubling remarks of its most prominent board member – best-selling science fiction writer Orson Scott Card.

“The NOM has argued that it is not a homophobic organization, but Card’s remarks suggest otherwise. Card, who represents the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on the board and received an effusive welcome last week from NOM president Maggie Gallagher, supports criminalizing sex between same-sex adults:

Laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books…to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those who flagrantly violate society’s regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens.

How long before married people answer the dictators thus: Regardless of law, marriage has only one definition, and any government that attempts to change it is my mortal enemy. I will act to destroy that government and bring it down, so it can be replaced with a government that will respect and support marriage, and help me raise my children in a society where they will expect to marry in their turn.

Biological imperatives trump laws. American government cannot fight against marriage and hope to endure. If the Constitution is defined in such a way as to destroy the privileged position of marriage, it is that insane Constitution, not marriage, that will die.

“It is one thing for a science fiction writer to have such views, but it’s something much different for a national organization like the NOM to endorse those views by giving Card such a prominent position on its board. We call on the NOM to categorically reject Card’s radical statements.”