The Under Fire exhibition at I space and series of events at the University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign are a continuation of the international discussions
and publications initiated by artist and writer Jordan Crandall. Under Fire
presents a discursive engagement with global militarization and political
violence, incorporating perspectives from multiple disciplines to explore
the contemporary organization, representation and materialization of war.

I space hours are: Tuesday - Saturday, 11am - 5pm [closed Sunday-Monday]
I space is the Chicago gallery of the College of Fine and Applied Arts, University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
ispace :: 230 west superior, 2nd floor :: chicago, il 60610
Under Fire has been made possible by support from the Illinois Arts Council,
the UIUC School of Art & Design and the Krannert Art Museum

EVENTS

Eyal Weizman: The Politics of Verticality
Time & Location: UIUC Campus, TBA
Israeli architect, activist and scholar Eyal Weizman will discuss his ongoing
research into the role of architecture and urban planning in the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. Weizman is currently the director of Goldsmiths College’s
Centre for Research Architecture.
Made possible by the Center for Advanced Study, the Center on Democracy in
a Multiracial Society, Program in South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies,
Global Crossroads, Unit for Criticism and Interpretive Theory, Dept of Urban
and Regional Planning, Dept of Landscape Architecture, Program for the Study
of Religion, Program in Asian Law Politics and Society

In War/At War: The
Practice of Everyday
October 5 - 29: OPENSOURCE Art in Champaign, IL
OPENSOURCE Art presents an exhibition and series of events that investigates
personal relationships with war through the everyday practice, projects,
and tactics of individuals.
Opening reception: Thursday, October 5, 7-10pm. For more information visit:
opensource.boxwith.com
OPENSOURCE Art is located at 12 E. Washington Champaign, IL 61820.

Critical Art Ensemble: The Marching Plague
October 9, 5:30pm: UIUC, Krannert Art Museum [Room 62]
Steve Kurtz and Lucia Sommer, of the internationally acclaimed artist collective
Critical Art Ensemble, will present their new film that takes on the history
and current rhetoric of biological warfare.
Made possible by the Krannert Art Museum and the UIUC School of Art & Design

ESSAY

There is a War Going On.
By the 1980s, the deindustrialized cores of the cities dotting my native
American Midwest were so often described as 'bombed out' and resembling
a 'war zone' that one had to wonder: why does it seem that everyone but
the nation's fathers tells us these are zones of hot conflict? For if there
exist momentary and recognizable likenesses between parts of Belfast and
parts of Gary, parts of Mogadishu and parts of Detroit, then perhaps the
aesthetic commonalities indicate substantive, material underpinnings. I
find it reasonable to view these landscapes as the product of the same
general phenomenon, war. Once we do, we see that a theater of ongoing armed
conflict persists on American soil, in which the citizenry wages a chaotic
but low-level war on parts of itself. At the same time it is both mitigated
and worsened by a vast and well-funded security apparatus. The American
citizenry is armed and waging war at home, neither in an overly organized
fashion, nor with much thought given to strategic goals. The incoherence
of this unnamed conflict is more evident than ever in the society's overseas
wars -- wars that, because of their vast deployments of state-mobilized
arms and diplomatic powers, may unleash exponentially greater degrees of
turmoil. Anybody with a good sense of how violence permeates American life
inside its borders sees the irrationality and mayhem of the American-led
War in Iraq without much surprise.

Choose Sides.
Around the world, armed conflicts create an astounding range of horrific
effects. Bodies without limbs, mass murder, acute and general environmental
devastation, imposed economies of starvation and disease-these are only
some of the modern horrors of war. The horrors are also affective and immaterial,
and no less consequential. Depression, despair, and post-traumatic disorders
are commonly produced by the loss and violence of war. A class of extreme
affects, including an ever-proliferating variety of rage and hatreds, thirst
for blood and revenge, are not only produced in conditions of armed conflict,
but are used as standard weapons by those who learn to channel them. The
obvious analysis says that because the entire affective realm is one mediated
by symbols, images, and language, which transmits as part knowledge (ideology)
and part feeling (aesthetics), artists and cultural workers occupy a special
place in the geography of affective conflicts. Whether this is true or
not, it must be recognized that a matrix of first world privileges ensures
that the temptation to rank the affective realm as the primary terrain
of conflict, or to divorce affects from the material world with which they
are wholly intertwined, remains strong among cultural workers in the developed
world. This is a tendency that must be resisted.

Battle the Feelings.
Considering the material/immaterial terrain of conflict and the ubiquitous
but irregular reach of war, we can see that the continuum of conflict intensity,
going from entirely unarmed to wholly militarized, maps an uneven distribution
of violence rather than a scale of morality. Therefore the question of
violence is neither the only, nor the most important, moral problem. We
also know that conflicts do not exist as binaries; 'you are either with
us, or against us' is the language of fascist states. Armed conflicts always
involve more than two mutual antagonists, struggles exist within struggles,
factions and stakeholder groups overlap. But every contested situation,
no matter how complicated, presents a question to those who consider themselves
invested in its outcome: for what and with whom do you stand? Such are
the saturation levels of bloodshed that this question of allegiance --
to whom and/or to what, and with what degree of loyalty? -- rather than
of violence (is it justified, etc.), is the main moral challenge facing
potential partisans. Because each conflict presents its challenge of allegiance
differently and according to unique circumstances, potential partisans
(i.e., all of us) may find the new geographies of armed conflict and war
illuminating. When we map the intersections of war zone affects and military
hardware, wartime ideology and security state architecture, consumer surveillance
and contractor profiteering, or any other conjoined sets of wartime social
practices, we may better calibrate interests and commit to allegiances.
This is the urgency embedded in all creative and critical representation
of war. - Dan S. Wang 2006
Dan S. Wang is an artist and writer living and working in Chicago.