Main menu

Sub menu

Letter To The Editor

No Mayor or Elected Official Should Ever Be in Charge of Hiring/Firing

Dear Editor,

(A municipality only benefits
when the best/most qualified candidates are hired)

I am writing to share my
thoughts about how city employees, safety and non-safety, should be hired, and
why everything should go through an HR department and the particular city department,
not the mayor, council, or any appointee of either.

There is no requirement that
any elected official be trained in HR/Personnel/City Management or Business. A
municipality runs as well as its employees are qualified to run it. No mayor or
elected official, even if they have a background in some of the above, has the
qualifications to hire every department head. For example, how does a mayor
know who would make the best police chief or fire chief if they have never done
either job? A police or fire chief taking quick, decisive action in emergencies
is not only essential, those decisions could make the difference between life
or death for his/her police officers/firefighters.

Even non-emergency services
can affect emergency services down the road. One example could be the building
official. If the building official and code enforcement are not doing their
job, whether due to their own incompetence or being told by a mayor that they
must do things a certain way, firefighters and police can be injured or killed
when they end up at an incident where a building with multiple code violations
has been allowed to exist without consequences.

Hiring can be based on who
the particular mayor likes or is related to, which is a recipe for disaster.
Even if a mayor tries not to be biased in any way, at the end of the day,
he/she is most likely not qualified to make the determination. The citizens
deserve the best qualified person they can get.

Now, let’s talk about how a
department head SHOULD be hired. Let’s say Bob the Building Official retires or
moves on to another city/town and an opening comes up. The position should be
advertised far and wide, and applications gathered. Those with minimum
qualifications should be given a first interview. That interview panel should
consist of a person from HR, A Building Official from a nearby city, A member
of the community (to ask questions and give possible scenarios, they would give
their opinion but not have a vote in the process), and possibly a building
inspector or code enforcement officer.

How should a building
inspector, for example, be hired? Same general idea, except they interview with
a person from HR, the building official, a member of the community, and perhaps
a current building inspector.

I will be bluntly honest and
say I don’t know which governing body can change this. But you can bet a week’s
pay I will find out.

The citizens of any
municipality deserve the best, most qualified person for every city position.
There should never be politics/personal bias in this process.