Kidnapping Khashoggi on Hariri’s abduction anniversary

The young and Authoritarian of Saudi Arabia has also broken the borders to suppress its opponents. The disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Consulate in Turkey has triggered a series of criticisms of Saudi Arabia, in particular Mohammed Bin Salman, in the international arena. Following the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi, the Le Figaro newspaper reported that recklessness and crudity of Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia along with Trump’s support, has pushed the crackdown of the country beyond its borders.

The young and Authoritarian of Saudi Arabia has also broken the borders to suppress its opponents. The disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Consulate in Turkey has triggered a series of criticisms of Saudi Arabia, in particular Mohammed Bin Salman, in the international arena. Following the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi, the Le Figaro newspaper reported that recklessness and crudity of Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia along with Trump’s support, has pushed the crackdown of the country beyond its borders.

The young and Authoritarian of Saudi Arabia has also broken the borders to suppress its opponents. The disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Consulate in Turkey has triggered a series of criticisms of Saudi Arabia, in particular Mohammed Bin Salman, in the international arena. Following the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi, the Le Figaro newspaper reported that recklessness and crudity of Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia along with Trump’s support, has pushed the crackdown of the country beyond its borders.

Famous French writer, journalist, and researcher, George Malbrunot, believes that Bin Salman’s legitimacy is oppressive and does not allow people to interfere his affairs even from outside of Saudi Arabia. Bin Salman does not like to be called Democrat, because he previously said during a meeting with an international official in Riyadh that “do not provoke me with human rights, because that does not matter to me.”

Indeed, contemplation on the prospect of the disappearance of Khashoggi, the Saudi writer and journalist, shows that no person or country can benefit from the abduction of a Khashoggi except Bin Salman.

A review of the life story of the Khashoggi shows that this Saudi writer has come a long time with considerable credibility and consultation with the Saudi authorities, and only during the past year and just after the of Bin Salman becoming the crown prince of Saudi does not tolerate the policies and views of the young prince and in response, chose an unwanted exile outside of the Saudi border and criticizing him.

Thinking about the fate of the opponents and critics of the Bin Salman, including the illiterated and educated, shows that he also faces the fate of the opposition, just a little different in the form of him with them, due to his presence in a foreign country and being out of reach. Now Khashoggi has a similar point with others in criticizing and their differences with are different fate they had.

Khashoggi should have a fate with like the other dissidents, so that all the Saudis come to the conclusion that the fate of opposing Salman and his son is a similar destiny of torture, imprisonment, and murder, and that the Salman system is no different from anyone, not even old friends who today, joined the critics and has turned into the current opposition, and there are no security for critics and opponents and, of course, freedom inside the country or abroad.

Regardless of whether Khashoggi was killed or still alive but imprisoned and under surveillance inside Turkey or Saudi Arabia, it is a fact that in the new circumstances, the Saudi regime is most benefited from this case, since the disappearance of Khashoggi deflected the public opinion from the unprecedented insult of Trump to Malik Salman towards the fate of the Khashoggi.

Although Bin Salman, in an interview with Bloomberg, tried to convey with mild expressions such as hearing criticism from friends is precious while Trump’s description of a two-week Salman regime’s life is inaccurate, reinforced the analysis that Saudi officials not only insisted that humiliating relations like the past, but also they try to extend the Salman rule by distracting the attention and focus of these media of these insults and earn its continuation for Bin Salman.

But there was a remarkable point that exactly one year ago, Saudi Arabia, following a formal invitation from the Lebanese Prime Minister to visit Riyadh and to meet with his king, changed the table as soon as Hariri arrived in Riyadh, and this official political visit turned to a weird issue in the international arena, and the behavior of the Saudi Arabia leaders has plunged the world into shock.

The rule of Saudi king Malik Salman, who had taken Hariri hostage after his official visit to Riyadh, ultimately forced him to declare his resignation from a state-run al-Arabiya channel in Saudi Arabia, an act contrary to international custom and law. The action that contrary to Riyadh’s expectation not only did not face Lebanon with a crisis of conflict, but with Hezbollah’s wised reaction, the reaction of the Al-Mostaghbal (Hariri party) and other Lebanese parties and officials, including President Michel Aoun, led to the unification of all Lebanese groups which show their support of Hariri and condemned the intervention, detention and hostage-taking action of Riyadh and called for his return to Beirut.

Even the Lebanese authorities threatened to pursue Hariri’s detention in Riyadh through the United Nations and in accordance with international law, until eventually Riyadh was forced to retreat from his childish stance, but the stigma of this conspiracy remained on the forehead of the country and was recorded in history.

Right now, on the anniversary of the strange case of hostage taking of the prime minister of Lebanon, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia this time in another country has foolishly kidnapped and held hostage, but this time hostage is not a political person with diplomatic immunity, but a patriotic and opposed to Mohammed bin Salman’s policies, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, and at the same time a prominent media figure that does not rank much of Hariri’s political reputation during his hostage-taking by Riyadh.

About us

We are committed to keeping the Islamic world for tomorrow and beyond, and alongside that, we guarantee that important Islamic frameworks are our priority.
We are committed to protecting the Islamic world and, accordingly, we recognize knowledge as an important factor in the ability and consider the media one of the most important means of expanding it.
Accordingly, our fields of activity are the Islamic principles and the interests of the Ummah of Islam. We seek to raise awareness in the international arena and will work hard to achieve it.
It is our duty to be dynamic in the period when foreign aggression against Islamic countries, especially the Islamic Republic, has continued and we are on the path to defending Islamic values.
We believe in the progress and prosperity of the Islamic world for unity, integrity, justice and wisdom, and we hope we can move on to advance and advance it.