God and Nature: on the Nature of Things, established by the Creator of Things.

God and Nature: on man’s Perversion of the Nature of Things, even with the best of intentions.

I submit that every thing in existence is a creature,
i.e., a created thing, and that the creation of a thing demands the
pre-existence of its creator. Every created thing has a pre-ordained
purpose for being – a function, or a part of a greater function, all
wrapped up in a reason for being that we call its nature. Thus it is
the nature of a rock to stand still, it is natural for a bird to fly, it
is the nature of an electron to spin round the nucleus of an atom.

I submit that when man changes the nature of a thing, it is no
longer that thing, for its created-in nature has been changed. If you
change the nature of a thing, it is no longer that thing; it has become
something else. That may be good, or it may be bad. The question is,
what things should be changed, and what things should be left to their
original nature. When is change good, and when is change merely a
perversion of nature.

It is the nature of an automobile to be used to transport people
and things from place to place traveling over the ground. If man
changes the nature of the engine to drive a propeller instead of the
wheels, and fixes wings on it, and other modifications, he could change
the automobile into an airplane. If the changes were successful, it
would no longer be an automobile; it would be an airplane, because its
very nature would have been changed. You cannot change the designed-in
nature of a thing without changing the thing. It will no longer be the
thing that it was.

Man is the creator of many things, for many purposes. Because of his
natural ability to fashion all sorts of tools and complicated machines,
man often becomes overly proud and elevates himself to levels high
above his designed-in nature. Occasionally, nature – dare I say man’s
Creator – slaps man down and reintroduces him to humility. Always there
are some who oppose nature (which is to oppose the Creator) who quietly
live through the slap-downs and eventually reintroduce perversion of
nature into the larger society through use of the power of suggestion
and clever persuasion.

It has always been so, throughout the entire history of Western
Civilization. In Genesis we see that the Creator, after an agreement
with Abraham regarding the future of Sodom and Gomorrah, failed to find
even ten decent men there, and destroyed the place and all in it. But
then, when Jonah announced to Nineveh: “Yet forty days, and Nineveh
shall be overthrown!” all the people, including the king, repented, and
Nineveh was spared. Man recognized his own nature, which is to say, man
recognized his own Creator.

That was then, and this is now.

Today, the social elites are far more sophisticated, because they are Enlightened and they are Modern,
and they are highly educated, and thus able to throw off all the
ancient teachings as mere silly superstitions of the ill-educated masses
beneath them. Enlightened, modern educated men know that there is no
such thing as a Creator. How do they know this? Well, they ignore all Arguments for God
in favor of concentrating on a lack of the solid empirical evidences
required of material science. They see no solid, material proof of the
existence of God. They will accept only material evidences, even of
immaterial things, and only solid empirical evidences, even for the
ephemeral and untouchable. Mere existence of things, including man, is
not enough for the sophisticated elites.

In Enlightened, Modern, well-educated and sophisticated thought, backed up by an overwhelming world-wide consensus among all of
TTRSTF4
, all things, including even man, came into being through a long chain of accidental collisions of different kinds of matter; that life itself came into being by some accident of nature, and that since then all things and all life forms have “evolved” into what we see today.

Thus we see the “scientific” drive toward a forced Secularism
on society, for the “scientific” good of society. I submit that
Secularism is a movement toward forcing society into a theocracy in
which the only acceptable religion is atheism. And that atheism is a
religion, or a strictly faith-based belief system, with no worldly,
empirical or natural evidences to back it up. The atheist cannot prove,
by any worldly means, that God does not exist; he believes that God
does not exist by faith alone; he is thus a faithful believer in
atheism, who believes by faith alone that God does not exist. That is a religion; or if you will, a purely and strictly faith-based belief system.

I submit that government forced or even government encouraged Secularism is a direct violation of the Free Exercise
clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. It is the
Constitutional duty of American government to directly oppose and
prohibit theocracy, including any theocracy involving atheism or
secularism.

The Nature of America. America
is one of the finer creations of man, created, many would argue, under
the inspiration of God. Here is how we described America’s founding
principles in the Political Ideologies page:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is
the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
Safety and Happiness.

This is our national purpose for being; our nation’s very foundation
stone. This is what America stands for before she stands for anything
else. If America is to be true to herself she must be true to the
principles promoting and protecting Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of
Happiness.

It is when men enjoy these three rights that the natural
system of Capitalism comes into being. Capitalism is natural;
Capitalism just happens, when and where men enjoy liberty.
Another word for Capitalism is a Free Market. It is not planned or
controlled or governed by any outside entity or government or power.
Just as liberty is natural within the breast of man, the free market is
natural where a culture is free.

It is a gross misinterpretation to call the Pursuit of Happiness – the ability of a man to work in his own self interest – a system of greed.
It is a slander. You may call it greed if you wish, but I submit that
self-interest is the first dynamic of survival itself. No one can ever
be of any use to anyone else if he doesn’t first take care of his own
needs.

Our Declaration of Independence guarantees that our citizens are
able to prosper by their own effort. A man must make profit before he
can be charitable.

These are the unique American Principles to which our Founders pledged “our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor”, in the words of Jefferson, to which all signed their names. They all knew that they were signing their own death warrants if the new nation failed to survive. They all signed.

And they all stood by those signatures.

Thus, the designed-in nature of America is to present to the world a
government that serves, rather than rules, a free people. American
government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.
The Constitution is designed to constrain government from exceeding or
going beyond the consent of the governed. We do not have an independent
Presidency, we do not have an independent Congress, and we do not have
an independent Judiciary. We have three co-equal and counter-balancing
branches of government, for that very reason. The Constitution’s Bill of Rights
– the first Ten Amendments to the Constitution – lay out absolute
rights of citizens that may not be infringed by any branch of
government.

The two enemies of the people are criminals and
government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the
Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the
first. – Thomas Jefferson.

The Advance of Secularism. Secularism
is, at its core, the evangelization or proselytizing of atheism.
Although many secularists may deny that, it remains true. The
Secularism movement is a movement toward the religious cleansing of
society. Secularism seeks to divorce all religious influence from
social intercourse. How does that affect the core designed-in nature of
America?

Well, since Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated man does not recognize any Creator other
than man, he does not recognize the “Creator” identified in the Declaration of Independence,
and thus, Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness have no particular
importance to him. The Declaration itself is not seen as the central
American purpose for being, but rather is seen to be merely a quaint, interesting document written by some old guys who were not nearly as Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated and well-educated as themselves. So the Declaration is
not America’s foundation, and it is not the very reason that the
Constitution was written, argued and ratified. It’s just an interesting
old museum piece.

And that brings us to the Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated view of the Constitution itself. Comrade
Obama (peace be upon him) has described our Constitution as a hindrance.
It is something to be gotten around and ignored, if not formally
repealed. He seeks an independent Presidency, just as Justice Ginsburg
seeks an independent Judiciary, and Harry Reed seeks an independent
Senate, and Nancy Pelosi seeks an independent House. Why, how else can
America be properly ruled? A nation cannot be ruled if the rulers do
not have sufficient authority to rule. The Constitution is a hindrance
to getting things done; it stands in the way of Progress.

And what of we, the governed? We – many of us, perhaps even most of us – like our current government, are largely Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated people, after the pattern of the Democrat
Party and the “Establishment” Republican Party. That is to say that
many, and perhaps most of us, no longer properly recognize our own
Creator, and we therefore and thereby deny our own nature. That is why
the political arguments and positions of the current government sound so
reasonable, decent and compelling to so many.

Alexis de Tocqueville once wrote:

”The best laws cannot make a constitution work in spite of
morals; morals can turn the worst laws to advantage. That is a
commonplace truth, but one to which my studies are always bringing me
back. It is the central point in my conception. I see it at the end of
all my reflections.”:

What are these “morals” he spoke of? The moral code of Western
Civilization came out of the Judeo-Christian religions, as described in
the Judeo-Christian Ethos
page. The moral code of America’s Founders and Framers was that same
Judeo-Christian morality. The moral standard of the American population
today is that same Judeo-Christian morality, since 86% of the American
population professes to be Christian, however well or poorly they may
follow the teachings of Christianity, and our largest religious minority
is probably Jewish. That is how we tell right from wrong; that is how
Tocqueville determined that the American people were a “good” people.

Thus, he wrote that America was great because America was
good, and if America ceases to be good, she will cease to be great. And
that Americans combine the notions of religion and liberty so
intimately in their minds that it is impossible to make them conceive of
one without the other. And that liberty cannot be established without
morality, nor morality without faith. And he predicted our current
decline, when he wrote that “The American Republic will endure until the
day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s
money.” And that “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of
government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can
vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on,
the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most
benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy
always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a
dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has
been 200 years.”

How prescient he was. Today the Democrat Party, which is driven
by Marxist ideology, is doing everything in its power to turn our
Republic into a Democracy; from Amendment XVII, reducing the Senate to
be just another elected House, to ongoing efforts to eliminate the
Electoral College. At the same time, the Democrat Party is doing
everything in its power to increase public benefits out of the treasury
and make as many people as possible completely dependent upon the state.
To say that citizens are dependent is to say that they are no longer
independent, and that is to say that they are slaves. The ultimate goal
of the Democrat Party is, just as Tocqueville predicted, movement of
our Republic into a democracy, social collapse, and finally,
dictatorship.

How did we get to this point? Not all at once. It was accomplished one, little, unimportant, seemingly inconsequential Compromise at a time, with the best of intentions. Through reaching across the aisle, negotiating, working together to get things done, and to make progress. The problem is this:

The world changes, and thus we need to change to adapt to a
changing world, lest the changing world conquer us. However, morals do
not change. Morals cannot be compromised and remain morals.

In a radically changing world, man needs one, sure, unchanging fixed
peg, that does not move, that does not change, upon which he can depend
to keep him steady and centered and properly directed. Faith, and
faith’s morality, is it. There can be no compromise here. If you
compromise a moral, it is no longer a moral, for its nature will have
been changed by compromise. Similarly, any faith that is modifiable is
not a real faith. If faith is true, it cannot be compromised. If God
is One, and if God does not “evolve” or change, then any religion that
changes cannot be true.

Look at the Compromise page to see how our national morality has been compromised over time. Look at the American Political Ideologies page to see how Marxist notions from the Communist Manifesto came to be commonplace
items, administered, regulated, legislated and even Constitutionally
Amended into American law and government. From a centralized banking
system, to a graduated income tax, to a public education system, to Separation of Church and State, to Secularizing society,
to the “declaration of human rights,” to redistributionism, to social
engineering, to national and even international organized labor, to
invented class warfare; the list is endless. None of these things came
out of our founding or constituting documents; they all came out of
Marxism, which is an overarching ideology that is at deadly enmity with
Constitutional America.

Part of the process of becoming Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated people involved general acceptance of new
“truths” that were never true. I’m not going to go into detail here
again on them; look at the Refuting Darwin page, the Refuting Freud page, the Refuting Marx page and the Refuting Mohammed for the four Biggees. There are more like them among the navigation buttons in the left column of this page. The Western mind has to be Enlightened, Modernized, Secularised, sophisticated and well-educated into acceptance of each of these gross frauds.

But those are just for openers. Al Gore has already greatly
enriched himself at the expense of the American citizenry with his
global warming scam, and he came close to making himself perhaps the
richest man in the world by legally forcing, through concocted
International Law, every company and every nation on earth to buy phony
“carbon credits” exclusively from business entities owned or controlled
solely by him. To save the planet, of course. But, where is the
empirical evidence that man causes climactic cycles, or that man can do
anything at all to change the local weather, let alone the global
climate? There isn’t any. It never existed. It’s a flat out fraud.
Among the many.

We have open frauds all round us, all supported by elite intellectualism. Do you remember the “Sybil” story, about the girl who had some 16 different identifiable personalities? Best selling book, movie, run in series in print and on TV, made millions. It, too, was a fraud and a hoax, from the beginning. Authored by “therapist” Cornelia Wilbur, in collusion with patient Shirley Mason (who was Sybil) the whole thing was cooked up out of nothing. As further proof that even
TTRSTF4
don’t need any evidences for any wild theories, publication of this hoax induced a rash of some 40,000 cases of “known” multiple-personality disorder discovered on psycho-therapy couches. All of these patients were convinced they had the disorder; all the “therapists” were convinced they were treating it, and all the time, there was no such thing. All that was required was that all involved be Enlightened, Modernized, Secularised, sophisticated and well-educated before hand. Then, you no longer need real evidence. Your worldly sophistication will always show you the way. We may wonder how much money was paid out by those 40,000 patients, and by all those insurance providers, over an outright fraud.

Turning us into an Enlightened, Modern, Secular, sophisticated, well-educated people took a lot of time and effort. Thundering herds of
TTRSTF4
, piles of fraudulently-written text books, whole universities and colleges and the whole public school system were dedicated to the cause. Even history has been re-written to support the lies that lead us into dictatorship. The
SLIMC1
has contributed mightily to the cause, as pointed out in the Professional Liars of Journalism page. Big time journalists have been subtly backing Marxism against Constitutional America at least since Castro took power in Cuba and surprised the world by announcing that he was a Marxist-Leninist.

These thoughts were triggered by the
ongoing contest for the selection of a Republican Party candidate for
the Presidency, and the open Democrat Party – News Media attack on Rick
Santorum’s Christian faith and personal moral standards. Interestingly,
and quite predictably, he didn’t even bring it up – they did. The
whole current “Conservative Social Issues” public debate was invented,
magnified and falsely reported by the Left, not by Santorum or any other
Republican candidate. It wasn’t even on their radar screens. The
topic was raised and amplified by Comrade Obama (peace be upon him,) his
mainstream news media propaganda wing and his so-called "Journalist"
surrogates acting as “moderators” of Republican candidate debates.

In this election cycle, no social or moral issue was ever raised
by any Republican candidate. When they were raised, they were always
raised by Marxist / Obamunist debate moderators, or by some other member
of the Obamunist media, or by some big Democrat speaking publicly.
It's all propaganda, aimed at changing and controlling the Republican
political discussion, because Marxism / Obamunism has already lost all
other political high ground.

Now they – the Obamunists, and the Obamunists alone – have turned
the Republican candidate’s political hot topic du jour to revolve round
Artificial Contraception, of all things.

Well, ho hum, heavy sigh and here we go again, with yet another Enlightened, Modern, Secular, sophisticated, well-educated example of supposedly intellectual
direct opposition to nature itself, and to nature’s God. A few points
to make before we get into the real meat of this phony, fraudulent,
politically contrived controversy:

The only people who have even raised the topic of Artificial Contraception
in this entire election cycle have been Obamunists, Democrats,
Journalists and other Marxists, sometimes including “Establishment”
Republicans.

They lie. It’s quite the other way round; the shoe is on the other
foot. It was Democrats who “administered” and “regulated” how public
school teachers were to provide condoms to other people’s children,
without parental knowledge let alone consent. And so much more. But I’m getting ahead of myself.

When, and how, did the very idea that Artificial Contraception might be “natural,” and not a perversion of nature, become such a commonplace, unquestioned “fact” among America’s Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated intellectual elites? Well, with the
advance of yet another pseudo-sophisticated fraud, called by the elites
the Population Problem. It was a hoax from the beginning, but it still retains a solid following among America’s Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated intellectual group-thinkers. I call them
group-thinkers because that is all they do; they are incapable of Critical Thinking,
and they are incapable of applying the scientific method to any
particular topic. Consensus thinking rules among the educated elites.

“Doctor” Paul R. Ehrlich, author of the fraudulent best seller The Population Bomb
is the central darling of the true believers in this hoax. Based on
longevity alone, it’s certainly among the most successful frauds; whole
nations still believe it and teach it to their children. But when you
look at what Ehrlich said in this book, and you compare it to reality,
you see that Ehrlich was and is a stupid ass among stupid asses. In
fact, if stupid asses had a membership club, they would probably
ex-communicate him and burn his membership card, because he makes stupid
asses look so bad. Reality shows that Ehrlich is far too stupid even
for stupid assery. Nevertheless, Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated intellectual elites lionize Paul Ehrlich
and embrace his hoax to this very day; he is their hero. That’s what
group-think can do.

Once God is divorced from the conversation, man is changed from
being a mere creature to being the central figure of creation. His
nature is changed. “Nature” becomes not so much a subject of
stewardship and care-taking as a creature of man. Man becomes the
creator, modifier and destroyer of nature. Suddenly, it is up to man to
save nature, and the planet, from – well, from man. Through a
myriad of other hoaxes that we won’t go into here, but that may be found
all over this site, super-intellectual group-think arrived at the
conclusion that man is bad, but all the rest of nature is good. Man –
the new creator – stands somehow outside of nature and is unnatural.
Man hurts nature, and so nature must be protected from man, by – well,
by man. Not just by any man, or group of men, but only by properly Enlightened, Modern, Secular, sophisticated, well-educated intellectual elites. All the rest, eventually, may be done away with.

In the thinking of the “Establishment” Reublican Party – which may accurately be described as Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated thinking – Republican candidates should
avoid “Social Conservative” topics at all costs. Why? Because the
morality topics are losing topics with the “Center” and with the
“Moderates” and with the “Undecideds” and with the “Independents” and
with other various truly stupid people. Well, “Establishment” thinking
is wrong. In this time of super-division and radical differences
between political Parties and political directions, the so-called Independent or Undecided
vote is, at this point, so miniscule as to be non-existent. This is a
flat out contest between American Conservatism and Marxist
Anti-Americanism. There is one and only one segment of the voting
population Republicans ought to be going after, and they are called
Constitutional Conservatives. To hell with the tiny and inconsequential
fraction of voters that still haven’t made up their little minds
whether America should be “fundamentally transformed” into a
dictatorship or not. The Independent vote is not needed; what is needed
is the growing Conservative vote.

Pelosi and Reed may have succeeded in purging or neutralizing the
“Blue Dog Democrats” in Congress, but not among the voting populace.
There are still all those Reagan Democrats out there, and their numbers
are growing. There are still all those union members who feel
disenfranchised and alienated from union leadership. Lots of them are
coming to Tea Party meetings, where they join a blue million thoroughly
pissed off Republican Conservatives and Libertarian Conservatives.
Unlike the Independents, we can make up our minds on political
issues, most particularly today, when the political differences are so
vitally important, stark and clear.

Now, I have in the past criticized the Libertarian political position, in the Definition of Libertarian page and in the argument Opposing Libertarianism, because of it’s amoral
standing, or lack of recognition of any fixed social moral norm for
everyone. And I have in the past criticized various “Establishement,”
or Enlightened, Modern, Secular, sophisticated, well-educated Republicans, and Progressive
Republican candidates such as Romney and Gingrich, for having waffled
multiple times on multiple moral issues. To radically change sides or
positions on, say, an economic issue, or a bookkeeping issue, or a
banking issue, or a spending issue, or any non-social / moral question
issue, is considerably different than a similar radical change on an
issue such as abortion, because a moral does not ever change.
Bouncing around both sides of such a straight up moral issue shows the
bouncer to be more of a political man than a man of principle.

But where the Libertarian may exhibit amorality on some social
issues, and where Republican “progressive” politicians like Romney and
Gingrich may moderate their own moral standards to profit from the
political wind of the moment, the Democrat position is just flat out
immoral. Always. There is a big, big difference between amorality,
ever-changing morality, and just flat out immorality in every instance.

Santorum should continue politicking as he has been politicking,
which is to say, not even bringing up the social issues or the moral
issues. But when the issues are brought up anyway, he should hang them
around Democrat necks, and Journalist necks, and Moderator necks, and
Obamunist necks, and beat them to death with their own issues. Moral
issues are winning issues with the voters. Forget the elites; forget
the experts; moral issues are winning issues with the voters. Period.

Democrat Party Institutionalized Immorality.
You cannot name one single moral issue that the Democrat Party is on
the moral side of. The official Democrat Party political position is
always, always, the immoral position. In fact, they turn moral
issues upside down; the people who call immorality immoral are
themselves, by that act, labeled immoral by the Democrat position. That’s the way it is.

Take abortion, infanticide, eugenics, etc. – you will find that
the Democrat Party loves it, sponsors it, champions it, supports it,
legislates for it, regulates for it, taxes for it, spends for it, and
that it’s a plank in their political platform. Any opposition to any
part of it is demonized as immoral. Any speech against it is
criminalized. Go figure.

Take open public homosexuality, homosexuality on the stage,
homosexual marriage, homosexuals in the military, homosexual scout
masters, special homosexual rights, homosexuality being taught as
“normal” in schools, homosexuality encouraged among the young, etc. –
you will find that the Democrat Party loves it, sponsors it, champions
it, supports it, legislates for it, regulates for it, taxes for it,
spends for it, and that it’s a plank in their political platform. Any
opposition to any part of it is demonized as immoral. Any speech
against it is criminalized. Go figure.

In the Judeo-Christian ethos, a lie, in and of itself, is an
immorality. The Democrat Party agenda, and indeed the Party itself, is
built on lie upon lie, fraud upon fraud, scam upon scam. And false
language. They can’t even call Abortion by the name of Abortion; they prefer terms like Pro-Choice, or Right to Choose, for obvious reasons. The Democrat Party loves, sponsors and champions the Eco-Nazi Movement, the Femi-Nazi Movement, the Homo-Nazi Movement,
and more. All these movements are part of a larger agenda to grow the
government, reduce liberty and transform America. To change our nature.

I could go on, but you get the idea. Even on the current hot political issue of Artificial Contraception, where the Republican position is, basically, don’t even go there, and the Libertarian position is, do it if you want to but leave me out of it, and the Romney – Gingrich position is, whatever the voters want, in stark contrast to all that, the Democrat position is, shut up and get on the cattle car; we’ll tell you what’s right and what’s wrong.

So the Dems sent a hand-picked plant to testify in a Congressional hearing about the vital need for Artificial Contraception coverage in Obamacare and all health insurance. No one else on earth was talking about Artificial Contraception. Isn’t that interesting?

Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University law student, emotionally
testified to the extreme difficulty of continuing in her studies without
massive financial aid to cover her contraception needs through law
school. Apparently, she was fornicating so much that she was going
broke. ??? Not an eyebrow was raised among the Dems. This poor young
lady was in danger of having to have (gasp!) unprotected sex, over and
over and over again, at Georgetown University law school.

She needed $3,000 to cover the three year program. If we’re
talking condoms, at .25 each, that means she’s fornicating about 10.96
times a day, 365 days a year for the whole three years. That’s a whole
lot of fornicating. You might think it to be unnatural. You might
wonder how she might have either the time or the energy to actually
study law. Young male students looking to fornicate with someone but
not having any luck ought to go to Georgetown law school, look up Sandra
Fluke, and get in line.

But, the numbers don’t add up. As Rush Limbaugh (or his staff)
learned, there’s a government telephone number you can call in
Washington DC, and we may assume other cities, who will supply you with
condoms for free. Or, if the oral version is chosen, a month’s supply
at Wal-Mart costs $15, which is even cheaper than you can get it from
Planned Barrenhood. Obviously, this girl was lying about the cost to
her and to her many fornicating friends, in sworn testimony before
Congress.

Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) was so off-put by the ridicule
heaped on her by Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck that he personally called
to comfort her, and told her that her parents ought to be proud of her.
Yeah, right.

Then Rush learned that Sandra Fluke not only knew ahead of time
that Catholic Georgetown’s health insurance didn’t cover her gigantic
contraception needs, but, knowing that, that’s why she decided to go there. She went there as an agitator.
As a good Alinskyite, or a good Maoist, she would “swim in the sea of
the people” and work from the inside toward eventual revolution. She
was a plant. No wonder Pelosi called her to testify in the bogus
Democrat political “hearings.”

If I am willing to allow Sandra Fluke to fornicate all the hell
she wants to, why does she insist on making me pay for her
contraception? Every health insurance provider is to be required to
provide it; every employer is to be required to pay for it; every
consumer is not allowed to opt out of it. All health insurance has a
cost. Employers add the cost of benefits to the cost of employing
employees. The cost of this benefit will affect the wages and other
benefits of employees, or even the number of employees. Who pays for
these benefits, in the end, is the end consumer, meaning, the employees,
even when they don’t officially contribute out of their pay.
Their employers treat health insurance, and other benefits, as a cost of
employing them. It reduces the bottom line; therefore, it reduces
employee pay.

This is to be a tax. If the government mandates it, and the citizen is required to pay it, it is a tax.

Note that the argument is slanted to make the public think that it is a right. Contraception for nymphomaniacs is a right,
and we are to pay for it. They pretend that contraception has to do
with health. All it does, health wise, is increase the risk of breast
cancer, increase the risk of blood clot, pulmonary embolism, stroke and
heart failure. But, as Comrade Obama (peace be upon him) once pointed
out, he wouldn’t want one of his children to make a mistake and be
punished with a child. A mistake, in his meaning, would be fornicating
without practicing safe or protected fornication.

But, bottom line here, you can’t mess with mother nature.

When moral issues are raised by
debate moderators, journalists, Democrats, Obamunists or other Marxists –
and only after the issues are raised – Rick Santorum ought to begin by
acknowledging how he knows how much the speaker despises Christianity in
general and Catholicism in particular. If that hatred is denied,
Santorum ought to clearly publicly recognize how the speaker has a very
funny way of showing it. If the speaker cannot or will not articulate a
clear statement of faith, Santorum ought to recognize the fact that
something about it obviously cannot stand the light of day, and how if his
faith was that poor or that weak, or that phony, he wouldn’t want to
talk about it in public any more either. He should repeatedly remind
the speaker exactly who brought the topic up, and exactly who made it an
open topic for public discussion.

Every moral issue is a winning issue for the Conservative vote.

Every Conservative, of every variety, is vastly more moral than any Democrat.

There are a whole hell of a lot more Conservative voters than
there are “independents.” Independents will not decide this race.
Conservatives will.

To Life. To Liberty. To the Pursuit of Happiness.

To God, and to God’s Nature.

=====

Sarcastic Acronym Hover-Link Footnotes: For the convenience of those readers using devices that lack a mouse, these footnotes are provided for all webpages, in case any webpage contains any hover-links. (If you don't have a mouse, you can't "hover" it over a link without clicking just to see the simple acronym interpretation. Click a footnote link to see the gory details.)

Perhaps you could explain that to the starving populations in
places like Bangladesh. Exploding human population is at the core of
the whole problem of sustainable development and sustainable resources.
The current world population cannot be properly fed and clothed, and
yet you would like to ban contraception.

How moral is that principle?

Date: Tue Mar 06 07:14:13 2012
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:

Dionysus:

Obviously you have not read the Population Problem
reference linked to in the article, which explains the starving
populations in places like Bangladesh. It also explains why much
greater population densities, such as that of the tiny island of Hong
Kong, with less natural resources and less agricultural land, are not
only not starving, but prospering.

I seek to ban no such thing, in civil law. I seek to publicize and attack the falsehood of your argument.

Every time I hear an argument using terms like sustainable development and sustainable resources I know the speaker is one of our Enlightened, Modern, Secular,
sophisticated, well-educated intellectual elites, who is convinced by
his Marxism-dominated education (indoctrination?) that he knows better
than all of us dunderheads who form the majority.

Changes pursuant to changing the website URL
and name from
Thinking Catholic Strategic
Center to
Catholic American Thinker.

Pulled the trigger on the 301 MOVE IT option
June 1, 2014. Working my way through all the webpages. .

Regards,

Vic

Language and Tone Statement

Please note the language and tone of this monitored Website. This is not the place to just stack up vulgar
one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or
introduce any position or argument, submissions must meet our high Roman Catholic and Constitutional American standards of Truth, logical rigor and civil discourse. We will not
participate in merely trading insults, nor will we tolerate participants merely
trading insults. Participants should not be
thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to
defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a
coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t
embarrass yourself. Nonsensical, obscene, blindly & doggedly anti-Catholic, anti-American, immoral or merely insulting submissions will
not be published here. If you have something serious to contribute to
the conversation, be prepared to back it up, keep it clean, keep it civil, and it will be published. We humbly
apologize to all religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say
these things, but the Hard Left is what it always was, the New Leftist Liberals are what they are, and the Internet is what it is.

"Clickbait" advertising links are not acceptable for posting here.

If you fear intolerant Leftist repercussions, do not use your real name and do not include email or any identifying information. Elitist Culturally Marxist Pure Authoritarians cannot and will not tolerate your freedom of speech or any opposition to their rigid authoritarian, anti-equality, anti-life, anti-liberty, anti-property, hedonistic, anti-Constitution, pro-Marxist, pro-Islam, anti-Catholic, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-male, sexist, pro-homosexual, anti-heterosexual, anti-white, racist, anti-Western, anti-American, Globalist, anti-Nation, blatantly immoral, totally intolerant and bigoted point of view.

This Form cannot be submitted until the missing fields (labelled below in red) have been filled in

ADD COMMENT

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

Silence in the face of evil is speaking. "We've had enough of exhortations to be silent!
Cry out with a hundred thousand tongues. I see that the world is rotten
because of silence." Saint Catherine of Siena

“An
error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is
suppressed…. He who does not oppose an evident crime is open to the suspicion of
secret complicity.” – Pope Felix III

“Do not forget your purpose and destiny as God's creatures.
What you are in God's sight is what you are and nothing more”—Justice Clarence Thomas

"Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, then, is the sin committed by the person who claims to have a 'right' to persist in evil-in any sin at all-and who thus rejects redemption." Pope Saint John Paul the GreatDOMINUM ET VIVIFICANTEM

"Not to oppose error is to approve it; and not to defend truth is to suppress it, and, indeed, to neglect to confound evil men-when we can do it-is no less a sin than to encourage them." Pope St. Felix III

If a purposeful violator of the Constitution who is a sworn officer of the governemt is not a domestic enemy of America and a traitor, then
there is no such thing, and the Constitution itself is without meaning,
and America has lost its grounding and its very purpose for being. Anti-American-Court

Live Interviews

"All the evils of the world are due to lukewarm Catholics." Pope Pius V

"All the strength of Satan's reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics." Pope St. Pius X

Click the image above topublish your essay or article here,to be included among those below.

Submitted Articles andReprinted Articles

(Note: copyrights on these articles wherever present will supersede the WebSite copyright at the bottom footer of every WebPage)

Still Time To Get It Right. “Once you understand the role of energy in everything, you can begin to appreciate why there's simply nothing more important to get right. Energy is at the root of everything. If you have sufficient energy, anything is possible. But without it, everything grinds to a halt.” Chris Martenson

The Heresy of Chrislam. Those claiming that the “Allah” of Islam’s Qu’ran and Yahweh or God of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are one and the same are missing one glaring point: GOD NEVER CONTRADICTS HIMSELF.

Never be lukewarm.Life itself demands passion.He who is indifferent to God has already forfeited his soul.He who is indifferent to politics has already forfeited his liberty.In America, religion is not mere window dressing and citizenship is not a spectator sport.Do not allow our common destiny as a whole people to just happen without your input. Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life; please God, and live forever.

NewsletterCatholic American ThinkerFree E-zine Subscription

Email

You will receive immediate email newsletters with links to new articles as they are published here. Your email is perfectly secure here; we use it only to send you theCatholic American ThinkerNewsletterand absolutely nothing else.

The Purpose of this grouping of links is to gather all site American political positions and arguments in one place.

Political Ideologies PagesLaying
out the contemporary American political factions and their positions,
as compared to the Founding Principles in the Declaration, and the
Constituting Principles in the Constitution. America is the first
nation in world history designed to be without classes - no nobility, no
royalty, no aristocracy - all men stand equal before the law.

"We belong to the Church militant; and She is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass Her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights.”--Pope Pius XII

"It is not lawful to take the things of others to give to the poor. It is a sin worthy of punishment, not an act deserving a reward, to give away what belongs to others."--St. Francis of Assisi

Truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance
may deride it, but in the end, there it is.—Winston
Churchill

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who
deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.—Ayn Rand

Atheist Genesis:

In the beginning there was nothing, and nothing happened to nothing.
And then nothing accidentally exploded and created everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally encountered other bits of everything and formed some new kinds of everything.
And then some bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into self-replicating bits of everything.
And then some self-replicating bits of everything accidentally arranged themselves into dinosaurs.
See?

“ … for I have sworn upon
the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind
of man.” wrote Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush in
the year of our Lord 1800. The context
involved resistance to any form of Christianity or Deism legally imposing
itself throughout the USA. We must wonder what he might say
about our current government's forced imposition of strict secularism – i.e.,
anti-theism – throughout the USA. I submit that legally enforced secularism of society, like theocracy, like Marxism,
and like Islam, is, precisely, a form of tyranny over the mind of man.Nothing good can come from the religious cleansing of Judaeo-Christian society. Government imposed secularism is just another form of theocracy.