It's
not very nice, but it helps to show the level to which it's
possible to have content which is objectionable without it being
too bad!

Rats
are vermin, and if you find you have a rat in your house, it has
to go. Various humane capture methods were tried in this case,
but in the end the rat had to be trapped. It was killed instantly
in a rat trap baited with something tasty. The rat weighed 350
grammes, and was 21cm long plus 20cm of tail. It was put on
display for a while to prove it was no longer alive in the house.

Picture
of a Dead Rat:

I
have no bad feelings towards rats, but I would prefer not to have
any in the house. Rats cause a lot of damage, and there are
health implications not all of which are good. There is a sense
of uneasiness which goes with their presence. Even if there is
only one rat in the house, it feels as if it displaces
civilisation. Although it might seem a strange thing to do, to
hang the dead rat up and leave it for a while on display, this
helped to dispel the state of hauntedness and doubt which would
otherwise have existed.

Another
Picture of a Dead Rat:

One
of the reasons for putting these pictures online was to define a
yardstick by which objectionable content can be measured. Because
pictures of a dead rat are only moderately objectionable, it
becomes possible to state that as other content on the site is
less objectionable than this, it is a site which does not contain
truly objectionable content. This then avoids the notion that clauses in contracts can
retrospectively claim some particular thing to be "objectionable"
when it is only being judged that way to achieve political/litigious
aims after the fact. We have not signed contracts to be judged
after the fact, nor signed blank cheques to be filled in later.