Owen Corrigan

The
Government’s recent reforms to education have focused on improving the quality
of academic provision and on fostering academic excellence. The introduction of
the Ebacc has spurred more schools to offer a range of traditional academic
subjects – English, Maths, Science, Languages and Humanities – to more
students. Reforms to school league tables have pushed out some of the shoddy,
dead-end vocational qualifications that had been on offer in some schools.
While moves to improve quality are always welcome, recent research from the
Institute of Education shows that the academic route through education may not
be meeting the needs of all learners, with up to 1 in 3 students dropping out
of A-level courses.

Other
research for the DfE shows that at least 1 in 10 students are classified as
‘disengaged’ from education, with other estimates even higher, where 25% of
such students end up as Neets by age 17. Previous government schemes like Young
Apprenticeship and Increased Flexibilities – both offering a greater degree of
work-based, practical learning to students aged 14-16 – showed positive
outcomes in terms of attainment and improved attitudes and motivations towards
education. In our latest Policy Exchange report, Technical Matters,we
advance the case for an alternative route through the education system from
14-19 with a focus on high quality technical and vocational provision that
could help to meet some of these challenges.

Vocational
education in England has come in for deserved criticism of late. A major review
by Prof Alison Wolf uncovered how schools had been prioritising their own
league table performance over the needs and best interests of learners. Many
students were being herded into low quality vocational courses which claimed
‘equivalence’ with two, three or more GCSEs, allowing schools to improve their
league table rankings but leaving students themselves with poor qualifications
not recognised by employers. Reforms to remedy this situation were welcome and
necessary.

Launching the Government’s update on the social mobility strategy yesterday, the Deputy Prime Minister railed against the class snobbery which, he says, has made Britain a closed society. A society where people don’t choose their place, rather they know their place. Nick Clegg argued that the under-representation of less well off pupils at Oxbridge, where only one in 100 entrants had been on free school meals compared to one in five in the general population, was morally, economically and socially intolerable. Key policies aimed at the transition points in young people’s lives will throw more grant money at disadvantaged university applicants while continuous monitoring of universities themselves will ensure they are making full efforts to widen participation among disadvantaged groups.

Yet this veers rather close to another form of snobbery, the kind which assumes that middle class aspirations around university attendance are the only aspirations we should encourage in young people. At the same conference, Ed Miliband deplored the snobbery that says that the only route to social mobility runs through university. Vocational education in Britain has long been treated as second class, he said, and claimed that it was essential to put in place a better offer for those who don’t go to higher education. In this he was correct.

In fairness to the Government, it has acknowledged the shortcomings of vocational education in Britain, undertaking to implement the recommendations made by Professor Alison Wolf in her report on the system last year. One of these major recommendations entails stripping out all but a limited number of vocational subjects from school league tables. This will have the desirable effect of removing educational pitfalls for pupils, where they end up with Mickey Mouse qualifications that are absolutely useless on the labour market. But alongside Michael Gove’s English Baccalaureate reforms, designed to encourage traditional academic subjects, vocational education seems likely to remain second class, the slow lane alternative for those who missed the turn-off for the university highway.