California's Governor Brown Delivers for Labor Unions

According to Katy Grimes of the Sacramento-based investigative reporting website Cal Watchdog for October 19, "For unions, Governor Jerry Brown is the governor who keeps on giving." Over the weekend, the California Governor signed into law Senate Bill 922, which will prevent cities from banning union-supported “project labor agreements” that force contractors to hire union workers if they want to bid on public projects. The measure, written only one week before it was passed, provides that if even a non-union contractor wins a public project, his workers are required to join a union.

Grimes added that the Governor "even included a signing message in which he proclaimed the bill to be 'fair' and 'democratic.'" However, she pointed out, the legislation "will actually do the opposite of what Brown's signing message said":

It suppresses the competition rights of small businesses and infringes on local governments' ability to use free-market, non-union construction labor. And it's already mandated by the state that all employees must receive union wages, even if they are not union members, when working on public projects.

In Human Events, Steven Greenhut noted that the Los Angeles Times, in an article on Brown's support for labor this year, commented: “When the dust settled on Gov. Jerry Brown’s first legislative session in nearly three decades, no group has won more than organized labor, which heralded its largest string of legislative victories in nearly a decade.”

What sort of victories does that mean? The Governor approved a new law that makes it hard for cities to go into bankruptcy when saddled with impossible union contracts and, instead, compels the cities to go through a mediation process largely dominated by public-employee unions.

Last November it was obvious that many state governments across the country faced a financial meltdown caused by many decades of extravagant spending, much of which was heaped on the robust public-employees unions. Some Governors, such as Scott Walker in Wisconsin and Chris Christie in New Jersey, have taken on those unions and insisted on restraining long-term commitments from taxpayers to these union employees.

Over the years, Jerry Brown has presented the image of a creative outsider, prompting some to call him in the past “Governor Moonbeam.” He ran last year as just such a Governor. In some ways, observers noted, he was ideally situated to reject special interest groups and do what was good for the state.

Such independence has seldom been seen in Brown’s dealings with organized labor, a powerful political force in California. He has taken a few actions in that direction. As one example, he vetoed a bill that would have unionized daycare workers. He also opposed ending the secret ballot on union elections for farm workers. But his record as a whole during the last legislative session is clear evidence that he is not tackling the really tough powers in California politics.

Brown also vetoed a bill that would have undone a state supreme court ruling that allows police, after an individual is arrested, to search through that person’s smart phone, e-mails, phone numbers, and even tap into a news reporter's data to fish for incriminating evidence. This veto was supported by the Peace Officers Research Association of California, which contributed generously to Brown’s last campaign for Governor.

Governor Brown has a long history of holding state and local offices in California. Besides serving as Governor in the 1970s, he has been Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Mayor of Oakland. The leftist Brown family — including his late father Pat Brown, Governor in the 1960s, and his sister Kathleen, who served as State Treasurer in the 1990s — has been immersed in California state politics for half a century.

Please review our Comment Policy before posting a comment

Thank you for joining the discussion at The New American. We value our readers and encourage their participation, but in order to ensure a positive experience for our readership, we have a few guidelines for commenting on articles. If your post does not follow our policy, it will be deleted.

No profanity, racial slurs, direct threats, or threatening language.

No product advertisements.

Please post comments in English.

Please keep your comments on topic with the article. If you wish to comment on another subject, you may search for a relevant article and join or start a discussion there.

Comments that we consider abusive, spammy, off-topic, or harassing will be removed.

If our filtering system detects that you may have violated our policy, your comment will be placed in a queue for moderation. It will then be either approved or deleted. Once your comment is approved, it will then be viewable on the discussion thread.

If you need to report a comment, please flag it and it will be reviewed. Thank you again for being a valued reader of The New American.