Thank you for visiting our forum. As a guest, you have limited access to view some discussion and articles. By joining our free community, you will be able to view all discussions and articles, post your own topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos, participate in Pick'Em contests and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today!!

There are way to many playmakers on this team. It's not the old days having Sidney or even recently with Alson. There are multiple weapons at WR, TE and RB to use on pass plays.

I hope I'm wrong. I think SR will get his but it won't be the break out season we are hoping just due to needed ball distribution.

I see where you're coming from. He had roughly 500 yards last season missing 3 games, being arguably the #3 receiver. With Bruce gone, and a full 12 games, hopefully he'll come close to doubling that this year. I'd call that a "breakout" season.

I hope he's adding some strength. I think adding that would really separate him and improve his game that much more. He's finally getting the college position down and the playbook. He's going to be exciting to watch.

There are way to many playmakers on this team. It's not the old days having Sidney or even recently with Alson. There are multiple weapons at WR, TE and RB to use on pass plays.

I hope I'm wrong. I think SR will get his but it won't be the break out season we are hoping just due to needed ball distribution.

If you're that good it doesn't matter who else is on the team. Based on what he did in the last few games I think Shaq is that good. I'm not counting on a lot of production out of the TEs. We've been talking for years on here about how great out TEs are and this is the year we will finally incorporate them into the offense as much as they deserve to be. I have yet to see it.

If you're that good it doesn't matter who else is on the team. Based on what he did in the last few games I think Shaq is that good. I'm not counting on a lot of production out of the TEs. We've been talking for years on here about how great out TEs are and this is the year we will finally incorporate them into the offense as much as they deserve to be. I have yet to see it.

Yea I've been preaching for years on here how TEs never have and never will be a big part of Spurrier's Offense. Eapecially this year with Busta injured who knows when and if he will be back at all this season.

Our O is gonna revolve around Mike D and the running game. Roland will be one on the main targets along with Byrd and Cooper.

__________________
"Yeah, Clemson can beat Virginia Tech as many times as they want, but ask them if they want another piece of South Carolina." - Colin Cowherd

Should have been ruled a catch after the review and down. No idea how they could screw that one up but they did.

From what I have gathered, even though Shaq took 2-3 steps with the ball clearly tucked away, those steps were deemed "not a football move", he was stumbling. Yeah, he was stumbling and not bumbling toward the endzone!! Since when does a stumble toward the endzone not constitute a "football move"?

Yea I've been preaching for years on here how TEs never have and never will be a big part of Spurrier's Offense. Eapecially this year with Busta injured who knows when and if he will be back at all this season.

Our O is gonna revolve around Mike D and the running game. Roland will be one on the main targets along with Byrd and Cooper.

In the spring game, the TE's were big, and if Owens hadn't had 2 catches jarred loose, they would've been over half the passing yardage.

imagine how nasty our receiving corps would have been this season, if bruce would have stayed. wow! a more mature roland, bruce, byrd and cooper would have been unstoppable. not to mention how well all of our rb's catch the ball out of the backfield, and our under utilized te's. we will still be very, very good, but bruce was just starting to really become deadly.

__________________Tact is for those who are not witty enough for Sarcasm...