The story behind the headlines: What the Brexit bill means for animal sentience

Will Morton - Public Affairs Officer

This was an important vote and one which we are deeply disappointed was lost. To appreciate the impact of the vote, it is important to understand some of the nuance behind the headlines.

In a nutshell, MPs weren’t voting on whether animals do or don’t have feelings. They were voting on whether it is necessary to put this concept into the Withdrawal Bill.

The Government argues it would complicate matters and is unnecessary. However, Opposition MPs argue that if it’s not included, there will be a gap left as UK law won’t state clearly that animals are sentient and that this must be a consideration in future.

The vote was on a proposed amendment to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, which sought to ensure that explicit recognition of animal sentience and the need to consider this in policymaking is maintained after Brexit.

The need for the vote arose because, while the Withdrawal Bill is designed to make sure that current EU law remains in place, including laws protecting animals, the sentience principle is contained in an EU treaty rather than legislation, and so therefore wasn’t covered automatically. MPs were hoping to fill this gap with their amendment.

“In formulating and implementing the Union's agriculture, fisheries, transport, internal market, research and technological development and space policies, the Union and the Member States shall, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals, while respecting the legislative or administrative provisions and customs of the Member States relating in particular to religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage.”

The proposed amendment to the Withdrawal Bill which was voted on read:

“Obligations and rights contained within the EU Protocol on animal sentience set out in Article 13 of Title II of the Lisbon Treaty shall be recognised and available in domestic law on and after exit day, and shall be enforced and followed accordingly.”

The rejection of this addition to the Withdrawal Bill doesn’t mean we will lose existing animal welfare legislation – domestic law will continue to apply and EU law will be incorporated into UK law.

What will be lost is the explicit recognition of animals as sentient beings and the requirement to take this into account in policymaking, which isn’t something addressed by laws such as the Animal Welfare Act (which is also only applicable to domestic animals and wild animals in captivity.) The main risk is that the Government would not be obliged by law to take sentience into account in future law-making, which could be at odds with its statements about wanting to advance the UK’s status as a world leader in animal welfare.

While the amendment could technically be reintroduced at a later stage, the sentience principle is probably unlikely to be accepted as an amendment to the Withdrawal Bill. The Government would see it as risky to start conceding amendments to the Bill in general as this could open up the Bill toany of the 400 or so other amendments proposed. However, they have said that they are exploring how best to reflect this obligation in UK law.

The League is therefore calling on the Government to make animal welfare paramount in any future policy-making and to make clear urgently how it intends to ensure the sentience of all animals is given full recognition in UK law when we leave the EU.

UPDATE:Prompted by the scale of concern raised by the vote, Environment Secretary Michael Gove has since used a written statement to defend the Government’s current position, arguing that the Withdrawal Bill “is not the right place” to address the issue, while reiterating that they are “considering the right legislative vehicle” to ensure that animal sentience continues to be recognised after Brexit. The debate isn’t over yet.

Latest

Positive measures to protect animals have been announced by the government today. The Animal Welfare Bill 2018 includes an increase in sentencing for animal abuse from a maximum of six months jail to five years, and also states that animal sentience must be recognised in any future laws.

Related

Positive measures to protect animals have been announced by the government today. The Animal Welfare Bill 2018 includes an increase in sentencing for animal abuse from a maximum of six months jail to five years, and also states that animal sentience must be recognised in any future laws.

This blog post corrects many errors published in a December 2017 Metro’s article about fox hunting, in which it confuses trail hunting, drag hunting and clean boot hunting. The post sets the record straight regarding recent incidents of hunt violence and intimidation, and rebukes some of the mistruths perpetuated by the pro-hunt lobby.

Wildlife crime, including the chasing and killing of animals using loopholes in the law, came under the microscope when the League Against Cruel Sports joined forces with the police at a prestigious conference this weekend.

A county council in West Sussex has banned new tenants from using cruel and indiscriminate snares to capture live animals on its land. The ban came into force this summer and is attracting interest from other councils across the UK.

Most read

As a team, we share the same passion – to stop animal cruelty in the name of sport. We are a tight knit team and we work hard within a fun, relaxed environment. We also offer something many employers don’t – an office full of friendly dogs!

Hunting was banned in England and Wales in 2004, but the law has never been properly enforced, and attempts to weaken or repeal it continue. The hunting law in Scotland is weak, and hunting is still legal in Northern Ireland.

Hurting and killing animals for ‘sport’ is one of the principal causes of animal cruelty in the UK: tens of millions suffer and die each year for ‘leisure’ activities. We’re here to protect those animals.

Bullfighting is perhaps the most well known spectator “sport” involving the killing of animals for entertainment. It has already been banned in most countries, but each year tens of thousands of bulls are maimed, tortured and killed for entertainment in Spain, Portugal, France, Colombia, Mexico, USA, Venezuela, Ecuador and Peru.

The hidden side of greyhound racing includes dogs kept for long periods in lonely kennels, painful injuries from racing and training, illness and neglect. Shockingly, thousands of surplus dogs die or disappear every year. The League believes dogs should not suffer or die for entertainment or for the profit of the dog racing industry.

The Hunting Act 2004 is the law which bans chasing wild mammals with dogs in England and Wales – this basically means that fox hunting, deer hunting, hare hunting, hare coursing and mink hunting are all illegal, as they all are cruel sports based on dogs chasing wild mammals.