At key points across time, Mormon missionaries emphasized different parts of the Mormon gospel. The way they delivered the Mormon message also changed dramatically. This session will look at several of those key points, surveying what the people who joined the Mormon movement thought they were joining and comparing those expectations to the actuality converts found when they “gathered” with the LDS community in Kirtland, Nauvoo, the Kingdom in the “tops of the mountains” and, as in the past half-century, when they became members of local Mormon wards.

2. J. Spencer Fluhman: “Unmasking the American Religion: Early Anti-Mormonism and the Problem of Pluralism”

Americans have been simultaneously fascinated with and repulsed by Mormonism since 1830. This session traces the ways antagonists decried early Mormonism and argues that their critiques tellus much about changing perceptions of religion’s relationship to the Republic.

3. Kathleen Flake: “Early American Priests and Priestesses: Gendered Office, Council and Kinship in Early Mormonism”

If Mormonism was, as Emerson quipped, the “after clap of Puritanism,”its particular sound was John Winthrop’s worst, antinomian nightmare. This session seeks to answer the question how did a movement that purposefully set about making every member a prophet and prophetess sustain any order, much less secure the cooperation of thousands? Whether Joseph Smith avoided the atomizing of his movement into a thousand prophet-led pieces by creating three overlapping charismatic orders within the church, each order constituting a source of sacerdotal and social authority and a means of regulating the same, will be discussed. Particular attention will be paid to Smith’s integration of women into these simultaneously liberating and constraining offices, councils, and familial kinships.

4. William Deverell: “West of Deseret: California, Mormonism, and the Coming of the Civil War”

This session explores national and regional controversies over Mormonism in the far West in the midst of rising sectional antagonism in the late 1850s. Pro-slavery sympathizers in the South”played the Mormon card” in their attempts both to divert attention from the slavery issue and discredit abolitionists and abolitionist sentiment. In the West, fears of Mormon territorial,theocratic, and economic expansion fueled debates about the future of California and that new state’s relationship to the Great Basin and Deseret.

This session excavates the surprising and previously unknown course of criminal law in the mid-1880s, revealing how prosecutors and judges attempted to craft a compromise in the “Raid” against Mormon polygamists. Over the course of multiple trials and appeals, Mormon defendant Joseph Clark of Provo first made new law, and then endured its undoing at the hands of the Utah Supreme Court. This process widened the gap between the Mormons and federal officials in other important cases,convincing the Saints that they had once again been the victims of double dealing. Yet Clark’s story also reveals considerable doubt and disagreement among territorial officials, and a desire to reach a compromise that would reduce the strain on Mormon families as well as federal budgets.

_______________________

Philip Goff Director, Center for the Study of Religion and American Culture Professor, Religious Studies and American Studies Co-Editor, Religion & American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis425 University Blvd., CA 417Indianapolis, IN 46202-5140Phone 317-274-8409; Fax 317-278-3354

Looks fantastic. This seems like an excellent conference all around–solid mix of believing Mormons and non-LDS scholars, every presenter a respected scholar, and every topic interesting, new, and relevant.