Christian Robottom Reis <kiko at async.com.br> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:27:10AM -0500, Doug Quale wrote:
> > There are some things we can discuss whether they should be in pygtk.
> > For instance, people have considered in the past whether widget
> > properties should be attributes. That would allow properties to be
> > get and set directly using attribute syntax in addition to using
> > get_property() and set_property().
>> There's actually a bug open for this that was considered for the freeze
> but eventually left out; Iñaki wrote the patch that is up at:
>>http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81879>> jpe, Johan and I have commented on it -- maybe others should chime in
> too. The issue I raised was "fear of namespace conflicts" that would be
> introduced by this, but I think it's rather minor.
I don't actually have a strong opinion whether that change would be
good, bad or indifferent, so I was hoping someone smarter than me
could give some good arguments one way or the other :)