Many national organisations representing people with disabilities are about to lose their funding, including Deaf Australia, which represents me.

If this happens, Deaf Australia could be forced to return to what it was in the 1980s, a small volunteer-run organisation with no funds. But in the 1980s volunteering was a strong part of our culture. The world is different now. People volunteer a lot less.

What will life be like for us if this happens?

Not good. Not good at all.

The price of liberty, they say, is eternal vigilance. The progress our representative organisations have made for us over the years has been about our human rights, our liberty.

For deaf people, the National Relay Service, new and improved interpreting services, captioning, Auslan/English bilingual education and early intervention; all these things give us access and the freedom to make our own choices. For people with other disabilities, it means things like accessible premises and transport.

When funding for organisations that advocate for us is gone, who will be there to be vigilant for us?

The gains we have made will be eroded. The onslaught has already begun: just a couple of weeks ago the government introduced a bill into Parliament seeking to wind back compulsory reporting and other protections of TV captioning.

With interventions from Deaf Australia and other organisations , and Get Up petitions signed by many of us, this bill has now been referred to a Senate committee. We still have a chance of retaining these protections, so long as organisations like Deaf Australia are able to do this work of fighting to protect our rights.

Without Deaf Australia and similar organisations for other disability groups what will happen in these situations?

We will all be on our own, fighting for our rights ourselves and struggling to be heard.

Years ago on my way to work each morning at the State Library of NSW, I used to walk past NSW Parliament House and often there would be a lone person outside the fence with a placard, sometimes a small group of people. And always I’d think to myself: “You’re wasting your time. You haven’t got a hope in hell of having your issue heard.”

This will likely be us soon.

The threat to our ability to be heard, and ultimately our liberty, is happening because the Australian Government is introducing a new funding model. Currently peak representative organisations are funded under a program called National Secretariat Funding. The new program is called Sector Development for Disability Representative Organisations (SDDRO).

It was released in July this year. When I looked at the information I was horrified. In a nutshell, instead of funding 13 national disability representative organisations as they do now, government wants to fund seven. Instead of the recurrent funding they were receiving, everyone had to apply for funding in a competitive tender. The outcome is expected to be known in December.

The seven disability ‘population’ groups that will be funded under this new SDDRO model are: women, Aboriginals, people from a Cultural and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) background, children, service providers and two cross-disability consortiums.

So five organisations currently funded will likely continue to be funded. Eight will be out in the cold. These eight plus any others not currently funded but needing funds, will have to squeeze into the two cross disability consortiums.

Only three of the five are actually Disabled Person’s Organisations (DPOs – organisations controlled by people with disabilities themselves); one is controlled by parents and one represents service providers. Why will service providers be funded to advocate for themselves when so many DPOs won’t be? Why are the interests of service providers more important than the interests of the people who use their services? Go figure!

Each of the seven organisations/consortiums will get $300,000 per year. (Most get about $165,000 now; National Disability Services, representing service providers, gets about $350,000 now.)

So if there are, say, 15 organisations in a cross-disability consortium, then each will perhaps get $20,000. If the consortium’s application is successful; it might not be, in which case they will get nothing.

According to government, this new model is their way of ‘encouraging’ the disability sector to ‘organise itself’. Fiddlesticks I say!

Why has government decided to do this?

It has been said that the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) will give people with disabilities the support they need, so most won’t need advocacy anymore.

More fiddlesticks! Many things are not included in the NDIS: education, employment, health services, transport and so on. We still need advocacy for these things. We still need advocacy to ensure the NDIS does what it should!

And anyway, bureaucrats in the Department of Social Services have been working on a new funding model for years, since long before the NDIS was a blip in Bruce Bonyhady’s imagination. I know this because I was one of the people ‘consulted’ about it over many years.

Government is constantly bombarded by requests to fund representative organisations. Many disability groups receive none, e.g., people with Down Syndrome and people with autism. Government has constantly cried “no money!” Yet a few years ago Children with Disability Australia, run by parents, received funding for the first time.

Why has government decided to fund what they call ‘population groups’ – i.e. women, children, Aboriginals, and people from a CALD background – and force what they call ‘diagnostic groups’ into cross-disability consortiums that have to thinly share funding?

One, they say the model is based on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). The UNCRPD talks about all people with disabilities collectively and it specifically refers to women, children, Indigenous and ethnic people.

Two, they say that the new funding model discards the ‘medical’ model and uses the ‘social’ model for which we have all been advocating.

Both of these rationales are disgraceful misinterpretations, pathetic excuses to narrow down funding decisions.

The UNCRPD also refers to many other ‘population’ groups such as race, colour, religion, and to specific ‘diagnostic’ disability groups such as deaf people and blind people and their specific needs such as sign language and Braille. Government has simply cherry picked a few ‘flavours of the month’.

And clearly they do not understand what a ‘social’ model for disability means.

A ‘medical’ model treats people as having medical problem that need to be fixed. A ‘social’ model treats us as a whole person and fixes the social environment so it includes us.

But Government has misinterpreted this to mean that it’s not about medical diagnoses anymore; therefore, ‘diagnostic groups’ (deaf, blind, autistic, intellectual etc) no longer need attention or significant funding. Only ‘social’ groups like women, children, Aboriginal and CALD people do!

They have not understood or have ignored, for example, that while some deaf women do have issues that are women’s issues such as domestic violence, most of their issues are communication issues directly related to deafness. A women’s organisation isn’t going to be focussed on communication: it’s a deaf issue, not a women’s issue.

And who’s going to be looking after the deaf men’s communication issues?

They have not understood that in cross disability consortiums someone still has to provide expert advice on the rights of specific disability groups. If representative organisations don’t have sufficient funding to do this then the voice of these groups will not be heard.

If all this didn’t have such disastrous consequences for so many millions of us, its stupendous stupidity would be hilarious.

After all the work so many of us did on explaining all this to government in so many ‘consultations’ it is so disheartening that they have made these decisions that disenfranchise so many.

They are going the wrong way! They need to go back and rethink the whole thing!

The other day, someone remarked that it’s probably too late to do anything about this new model. That was what motivated me to write this post.

It’s not too late. Final decisions are expected in December. Government can change course at any time.

Government can decide to throw out this disastrous new model. They can renew the funding that peak disability organisations currently get for another year or three and they can go back to the drawing board. They can, for once, actually listen to people with disabilities. They can do the right thing.

It’s time for all of us to stand up and tell them this is what they must do.

People have asked me, “Why aren’t representative organisations saying much about this? Why aren’t they making more noise?”

These organisations are between a rock and a hard place. It’s hard for them to know the best way to deal with this. If they say too much and seriously anger government they could ruin their chance for funding of any kind. If they say too little, they could miss a fairer deal.

And anyway, government – Ministers and bureaucrats – won’t talk to them about it while funding decisions are in process.

So it’s up to us, the community, to do something. The organisations that represent us and our disabled family members and friends now need us to stand up for them.

If we don’t, they may no longer be there for us, they may not be able to protect our rights anymore.

The new Sector Development for Disability Representative Organisations funding model will be disastrous for millions of disabled people and is the wrong thing to do. The government needs to throw it out and develop a new model that looks after everyone fairly, not just a few selected ‘population’ groups and service providers. Until government has done this, the current National Secretariat Funding model needs to be retained.

Remember to include your name in the email, and something in the subject field, e.g.: Funding for disability representative organisations.

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Post navigation

18 thoughts on “Wrong way! Go back!”

Karen thank you for clarifying this miserable pain in the butt of our politicians outlook and the model they are using. What a worry indeed. I’ve spoken to Consultants for all Disabilities in Tafe and my god, it’s like rewinding the clock to late 70′ s. As you said, we are back to Stone Age.
I went to a NDIS meeting as I receive funding from the government through Disability Service Package. However all this will change as NDIS will be set up. At this meeting, parents of disabled adults were frantic, carers and myself very worried, you know me Karen, I may be Deaf but now my health is in question. It’s so intimidating to have this funding cut off, what sort of life would I lead? Don’t forget a large percentage of people with disabilities plus multiple disabilities suffer from chronic depression, oh dear, had the politicians taken into account the outcome of oppression ? This will only increase the cue line at centre link !!

I will certainly lobby my concerns. Again thank you for your fantastic input however horrifying. I will forward this to my supporters.
Hugs

Hi Sharron. Yes it will be even worse for people like you who are dealing with so many things on so many fronts. Thanks so much for taking action on this, on top of all the other stuff you have to cope with. And take good care of you, my friend. xo

Gosh I was unaware of this – I’d heard mention of it but not in the clear way you have described the situation Karen. I’ll certainly share your important blog.
Just as a related comment it was only two days ago I sat down to look at the amendment being proposed for broadcasting of captioned content. I’d thought it was probably going to be cosmetic changes but there are really serious changes to accountability being planned for.
I agree with what you say about the NDIS being used now to promote the message that it is going to solve everything so there is no need for complexity and red tape in the sector now. We have already lost Ramp Up that was a great platform for the disability sector to communicate and now all these changes are before us, and planned in a way to limit discussion.
The Deaf community and other parts of the disability sector really need to start communicating better between ourselves about how to retain the hard won control we have of our own future. Maybe a Facebook page could be set up or similar? social media is really the last bastion for free discussion here at the moment.

If this does happen, then the Deaf Community will need to respond. It will need to respond in a way that is long overdue, with respect. Is there a right to an Auslan interpreter for a deaf student in schools in any state in Australia? Not that I know of-but I’m happy to be corrected. Is there anything more important than education? Education = knowledge = power. Education = tertiary education = jobs = security. Education = community participation. The Deaf Community currently does not have a right to these things. Go back to Gallaudet. Look at how they did it. When people don’t give you what you want, and it is important, you need to kick up such an almighty fuss that they can’t ignore you. If you want the right to an Auslan interpreter to become educated this is what you have to do. If you want the right to have a consumer body that represents you, this is what you have to do. It’s up to you. How bad do you want it?

I agree Julie. It’s up to all of us in the community to do something about this if we care enough about our representative body. That’s why I’ve suggested some concrete action people can take. If there are other things people can do, great, do it. Hearing friends and family can also help.

Recently Vicdeaf did a community consultation using live streaming. I wonder what possibilities there are to use something like this for some sort of live streamed discussion of the issues. it would also be good to have something on U Tube in Auslan. Captioning of the event would open it up to HOH too. Perhaps, because you have the profile, but are now no longer working Karen, you could lead community awareness raising on this? Writing to MPs is fine but I think it may need more than this because, until I read yr blog today, I didn’t realise what the situation was. I read a Rebuttal article a while ago that referred to it, but I didn’t know enough to understand what was being said. Understanding what the issue is, and what it may mean, is going to be crucial if people are then to act. I’d say raising the profile of this issue is a crucial first step.

Yes, we really do need something in Auslan about this. I’m not sure I’m the best person to do that but will see what I can work out. This situation really is a wake up call for the Deaf community, and also for other disability communities. We need everyone, disabled and non-disabled to help us and do something, not just the Deaf community. The immediate need is for people to tell government to stop this travesty. Everyone can help by sending in an email themselves and encouraging or helping others to also send in emails.

Thank you Gary. Yes hopefully we will have a very positive outcome. But you know, even if government goes ahead with this, that’s not the end of it. We will not give up. We had to badger them for years to get funding in the first place and we will do that again if we have to. This is not right and we will not just sit back and accept it. So if government thinks that taking away our funding is going to shut us up they will be sorely disappointed.