RT Reveals How Twitter Tried to Peddle Its Ads on Broadcaster During 2016 Race

RT has responded to Twitter's claims that RT and Sputnik tried to interfere in the 2016 US election, revealing that the social media giant was the one pitching a major ad buy to the television network ahead of the vote. The best part? RT ended up rejecting Twitter's proposal.

On Thursday, Twitter announced that it would ban Russian media outlets Sputnik and RT from advertising on its platform. The company said it made its decision after doing some "retrospective work" surrounding the 2016 US presidential race and in light of "the US intelligence community's conclusion that both RT and Sputnik attempted to interfere with the election on behalf of the Russian government." Sputnik and RT Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan issued a response, while Twitter users blasted the company, claiming its decision was censorship, pure and simple.

In a separate op-ed, RT revealed that in spite of Twitter's tough claims Thursday about Russian media's alleged interference in the US vote, back during the race itself the company was the one trying to convince the Russian broadcaster to make a major ad buy to spread its influence among voters.

RT deputy Editor-in-Chief Kirill Karnovich-Valua explained that during negotiations going back to April 2016, senior marketing and news partnerships managers from Twitter laid out a media strategy for the broadcaster in a custom-made presentation about the benefits of their platform.

According to RT, Twitter egged the network on to spend lavishly, showing off its platform and emphasizing its broad reach among voters. Twitter promised RT a series of perks, including a customized emojoi-hashtag to increase RT's brand awareness, customized analytics and research, exclusive closed beta testing of Twitter's new features, and even a dedicated team to help the broadcaster tailor its content and strategy.

RT did Twitter the courtesy of not releasing any of the confidential financial details behind the proposal, nor the names of the people involved, but did release a screenshot of a Twitter-created 'Mission Statement' which called on RT to "Deliver an unbiased point of view of the US Elections with an edge, utilizing the powerful technology of Twitter to distribute the message in real-time."

"Deliver an unbiased point view of the US Elections with an edge utilizing the powerful technology of Twitter in real-time". Curious...(2/2) pic.twitter.com/V2VjSH70er

What happened to the Twitter offer? According to RT, the broadcaster declined it over its excessive price tag, and lack of faith that the campaign would serve the network's interests.

Instead, RT went with the traditional road, spending just shy of $275k on conventional advertising of its news coverage on Twitter in 2016, in line with broad media industry standards. According to Karnovich-Valua, only a fraction of that actually went to US election-related coverage. Furthermore, in 2017, RT actually cut its Twitter advertising, citing "unsatisfying results" from the year before.

Hello,
!

We are committed to protecting your personal information and we have updated our Privacy Policy to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a new EU regulation that went into effect on May 25, 2018.

Please review our Privacy Policy. It contains details about the types of data we collect, how we use it, and your data protection rights.

Since you already shared your personal data with us when you created your personal account, to continue using it, please check the box below:

I agree to the processing of my personal data for the purpose of creating a personal account on this site, in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

If you do not want us to continue processing your data, please click here to delete your account.

promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;

contains links to viruses and malicious software;

is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");

“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;

violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");

doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.