Surveillance: A Most Unreasonable Search and Seizure
Correspondence to My Member of Parliament Abuse of Power II

Repression by Psychiatry

Overview comments about the "Psychiatric Repression" attempt which was coincident with and following the "State of Seige" on December 1999/January 2000. Each of these followed my 23rd September 1999 fax/letter to the Prime Minister which then turned up in my "Psychiatric File".

The Honourable ****************** Member of Parliament ********************************* House of Commons Saturday, 18th November 2000

Dear **************

Re: Abuse of Power Part 2A: Repression by Psychiatry

I am going to let the [seven] attachments speak for themselves. These already contain the specific allegations I am making about the abuse of power and using psychiatrists under the Mental Health Act as a means of repression. In this case it is far worse as they engaged in direct unlawful activity by trying to get me to vacate my flat while offering me money to do so. This only extends this clearly unlawful act to another Government Department: the Health Department.

These documents enclosed are self explanatory and read with devastating comment about what was and is going on in this situation. The Deputy Prime Minister presented a white paper to the Commons on Thursday last for urban renewal and revitalisation. A presenter for Radio 4 PM then asked the question in an interview: "Why do you think this plan will succeed where others have all failed in the past?" My answer is that the Labour Government is developing simultaneous repressive strategies to be enacted into law and carried out in the community by Mental Health professionals including psychiatrists with the intended purpose to repress dissent and problems.

These are what I have come to experience myself as "extra legal" measures. I firmly believe and have my own experience to back it up that once again this Labour Government will manage the image for success rather than achieve a reality if it comes to that with respect to its proposal. In this instance that image management will require the repression of dissenters and truth-sayers such as myself in the manner in which I have been treated.

In my communication to you yesterday on 17th November 2000 (Abuse of Power Part 1: Repeated ******** "Firing Squads") I pointed out that a psychiatrist said that he would remove me from my flat "When" he had the power. He did not say "If". This is the critical factor for the menace and threat to democracy, freedom and justice that exists as a part of the current pending legislation which will allow individuals to be incarcerated in hospitals as perceived threats without any indication of such a history as recognised by due legal process. I call on you in your capacity as an MP an as a member of the ********* ************* Committee in Parliament to reject that proposed part of the new law outright prior to its passage.

This is what the real abuse of power is that exists here as I directly pointed out to Dr ********* ********** [aka PPQ (Pill Pushing Quack)] in my letter at the beginning of this year to him following his coercive threats against me: "But even worse from a professional point of [view] you [Dr *********** *********** (aka PPQ)] will be using the practice of medicine to carry out repressive and extra legal activity which are designed to deny my own personal legal and human rights which residing in the privacy of my own home permit me to do to the extend tha[t] they are not already completely compromised by the ongoing surveillance as described in the documents in your possession already."

The first three enclosures relate to that coercive attempt to use the Mental Health Act and psychiatry against me which commenced last December 1999. A great deal of that activity is described in these three documents which consist of:

(1) my initial reply letter of 8th January 2000 to an appointment letter for a 13th January 2000 appointment that was subsequent to and against the background of an unannounced visit to my flat and attempted entry on 6th December 1999 by Dr ************* [aka PPQ]; [NB It is my belief that this triggered the "State of Seige" which then went on until the scheduled appointment as noted.]

(3) my subsequent reply letter dated 1st March 2000 to Dr ******** ********** [aka PPQ] in reply to his threatening and menacing letter in an attempt to coerce me into a further visit after I had filed my complaint when that complaint had not even been acknowledged as received let alone dealt with and replied to.

I made a couple visits to the ************* *********** ************ Health Authority in regards to the complaint only to be told that these hospital trusts are like impregnable castles (my words) and operate independently of the Health Authority (their words). I visited the Health Department Executive Offices [text omitted], and they could not even begin to help me. Since all of this is in your constituency, perhaps you can assist me in determining what has happened to my complaint so that it can be pursued?

Naturally in the context of this situation and my experience that word is a clear "double entendre" with regard to both the medical profession and "doctoring" a situation as I have experienced. There was a timely news item that related to my experience at that time so I commented in general terms about that situation regarding doctor/patient information exchange. I want you to be cognisant of this general situation in these terms as this legal requirement is all important to all patients. In light of your position on the ********** ********** Committee in Parliament I believe this information and my position as regards to the issue are important for your consideration along with the specifics of my situation as they still exists with respect to my complaint filed with the ************ *********** Hospital Chief Executive against Drs PPQ and BHH.

The last three documents are:

(5) my reply letter of 21st January 2000 to the Home Office section dealing with police complaints that I considered a method of burying the complaint. It was in response to their letter dated 19th January 2000 which was a reply to my fax to the Prime Minister on 21st December 1999. It is a reiteration of reasons why I would not file a complaint against the police at that time and goes into various areas and issues which need to be addressed and why they should be. It describes the foundation and reason for addressing the source and truth of the problems and issues;

(6) my letter to the Prime Minister at the end of the Millennium dated 29th December 1999 noting that the state of siege continued against me with its foundation in the abuse of power which was about to unfold even more devastatingly than I could image in the following two months with regard to the abuse of power by means of attempted psychiatric repression; and

(7) a short fax to the Prime Minister on 21st December 1999 noting that a state of siege had occurred following my letter to him of 23rd September 1999. I also explicitly note the existence of corruption and maladministration.

These are copies of my correspondence with the Home Office and the Prime Minister as they related to the ongoing problem and how it was being handled by all departments involved. In all of this correspondence I mince few words and tell it like it is. These are all-important documents to read as they reflect the abuse of power from the Prime Minister's office in both trying to suppress my dissent and complaint by means of the Mental Health Act and also by means of a coverup to sidetrack and "hide" the complaint as a whole in the Home Office as a complaint against the police which I resisted and explained why. It was important that I notify the Prime Minister of exactly what ensued following my initial complaint letter to him on 23rd September 2000. I also asked that my reply be forwarded to the Home Secretary which I believe it was judging by the public response which followed when he announce examining the management of police stations along the lines of managing both good and bad schools since there were good and bad police stations.

This still did not address my critical problem, and apparently it was left to the psychiatrists to properly repress my complaints by subverting the Mental Health Act by means of misrepresentation which could be achieved by drugging me into oblivion (how could I respond then?) had I been so stupid as to accept "blindly" the "benevolence" of this medical care or more to the point so afraid as to not accept it. There are sequences of events here which cause great alarm and raise many questions. My letter dated 23rd September 1999 to the Prime Minister was in my medical file as the reason I was summoned to ********** ********** Hospital simultaneous with an attempt to drug me into oblivion without any diagnosis or even a credible examination [PPQ] after I refused the unlawful attempt to get me to move from my flat which included a bribe offer [BHH].

The events of early December 1999 beg further questions for I had filed a complaint with the police by fax on Thursday, 9th December 2000 against the prime person ("**********") who visits the flat below mine (*********; actually she virtually lives there) for her direct harassment against me while I was returning to my flat. She is the one who is completely and totally obsessed with stalking and harassing me and drives everyone toward that end. Also at this time was the attempted access to the premises on Monday, 6th December 1999 by Dr ********** [aka PPQ].

The onslaught of the siege began immediately thereafter on or about Friday, 10th December 2000 and lasted continuously for a month. Both the reason for its existence and the fact that it lasted until the proposed 13th January 2000 visit with a psychiatrist can be seen as a terror campaign to drive me from my flat and into the hands of the psychiatric profession who then suggested that I vacate my flat indicating that payment could be arranged if I did so. This was an outrageous and unlawful action taken by the psychiatrist Dr BHH at that initial visit on 13th January 2000. When I refused this, I was referred on to a further psychiatric "evaluation" by Dr PPQ where the attempt to dismiss what I had to say and drug me instead into oblivion took place. Lobotomies are no longer required. Drugs do the same thing.

I know that there is nothing wrong with my mental health at all that a good night's sleep each and every night would help. In fact, I believe that it is better than most. I know the difference between right and wrong, and I have the inner strength and determination plus the ability to bring the problem to the attention of the authorities so that it might be properly addressed. This is what comes out in the last three documents attached as I have also made that explicitly clear to you. There is a purpose to my activity which I clearly understand as the correct one based upon a standard of values that I believe should be engendered in the community at large and adhered to. Allow me please to quote from Gail Sheehy's "Pathfinders" where she talks about responsibility and levels of maturity. It comes from a chapter entitled "The Purpose of Purpose" in that book:

"There is evidence in both psychology and philosophy that the making of rules, setting of values, and seeking out of universal concepts of justice is a natural developmental need in man, one that is either stimulated or retarded by his environment. . . . By the time a child reaches the autonomous stage, writes Piaget, he or she defines obligations in terms of mutual respect, reciprocity, and responsibility. "An essential product . . . is the sense of justice (wherein) justice prevails over obedience itself."

". . . (Lawrence) Kohlberg refined the Piagetian model by postulating three levels of moral development. Beginning at the "preconventional" level during childhood, our values generally are organised around manipulating rewards from others and avoiding punishment. Most adults move on to one of two "conventional" levels, in which one's values are shaped largely by situation and expediency; (1) the need for belonging, community respect, and social esteem; and (2) the avoidance of criticism and of self-punishment. Some people reach the "post conventional" stage, in which they are able to adopt "higher" values; such people make moral choices from a consideration of the needs of society and of universal principles of justice . . ."

"(Dr June Tapp, senior social psychologist for the American Bar Association, writes further) . . . In all, philosophically and psychologically, there is an advance from a dependent, hedonistic, and uncritical mode to an independent, altruistic, and rational manner".

Why do I bring this up? Because we all know we deal with it every single day, and we see it. It is very complex. It is very difficult to deal with, and it is very deep and repressed. It has to be acknowledged and talked about. It has to be brought into the open, otherwise we will find ourselves in mediocre management environments with mediocre results. In this instance crime and corruption will become the community standard based upon dishonesty and whatever is suitable for the moment. The problems will recur, and the resources we spend our lives working with will be severely impaired at a cost to everybody. We will go nowhere but down into a quagmire with only the illusion from an image maintained by brute repressive force in an environment where everyone is afraid to speak the truth for fear of being deemed mentally unfit and/or drugged into oblivion.

Please read these documents carefully. They are stunning and mind boggling in their content. There is a vested interest by all concerned in seeing to it that I am silenced and my complaints along with the backing documentation are destroyed. So far these people herein noted have done everything possible to abuse their power to effect that end. I hope that you can bring this to an immediate halt as it continues right up to the present hour with this past week being another extraordinary example of that continuing and ongoing effort carried out day and night.

Yours sincerely

Gary D Chance

My initial reply letter of 8th January 2000 to an appointment letter for a 13th January 2000 appointment that was subsequent to and against the background of an unannounced visit to my flat and attempted entry on 6th December 1999 by Dr PPQ:

The Honourable ******************* Member of Parliament ********************************** House of Commons Saturday, 18th November 2000 Abuse of Power Part 2B: Repression by Psychiatry

1. My initial reply letter of 8th January 2000 to an appointment letter for a 13th January 2000 appointment that was subsequent to and against the background of an unannounced visit to my flat and attempted entry on 6th December 1999 by Dr ************ [aka PPQ]:

A visit to my home is not convenient, but I will attend such an appointment at your offices at this time or any other at your convenience. Please confirm date, time and location by return post.

On Monday, 6th December 1999, an attempt was made to gain entry to my flat by ********** ************* and a Dr ************** [aka PPQ] noted by a compliment slip left behind at that time.

Living in a high crime area with other burglaries noted and being subject to a burglary attempt myself while inside my flat, I do not respond to either the building's front door bell and/or especially knocks on my door. The manner in which ********** ********* and Dr *********** [PPQ] both rang my front door buzzer from the building's front then appeared at my front door knocking on it several different times was precisely the way in which the earlier attempted burglary occurred.

I hope that you understand why I do not respond in such circumstances without prior arrangement as I feel my behaviour in such circumstances is both intelligent, reasonable and enables me to summon the police if necessary hoping to be able to apprehend such burglars. I have notified by fax the local tenant management group in June 1998 to contact me in writing as a result of this security risk and their threat to sue me at that time regarding access which I had already granted.

I did note, however, on the 06.12.99 compliment slip that ******** ************ indicated that they "called to see [me] today as arranged." I had no previous communications whatsoever from or with your organisation in any manner and had no idea what this was about or why it should even concern me. At the bottom of this, though, there might have been some possible misrepresentations that I had overheard from my neighbours which are without substance about which they are fully aware as the instigators and perpetuators of the harassment against me.

For this reason I did not call your organisation as this is a legal matter involving harassment against me by my neighbours which has been going on for 20 months. I have exhausted all conventional local means through the proper authorities by bringing this harassment problem to their attention and am now seeking a legal redress of the problem in the High Court.

As a result I was quite legitimately concerned about your attempt to gain entry to my flat and especially the note indicating that you attempted to do so "as arranged". If you sent me correspondence, I did not receive it. This has been a problem for me in this environment. I have not received my most recent BT bill in late December and have had to order another one which I did yesterday. Earlier in the summer of 1996 many pieces of important correspondence went missing. More recently I have noted attempts to tamper with my mail on two separate occasions involving conversations with the postman. This was later "almost" confirmed by him in a separate conversation in a casual encounter.

Please understand that I did not receive any such correspondence prior to 06.12.99. If I had, I would have answered it as I am answering your correspondence currently.

With regard to the matter at hand, please be advised that I sought assistance from my GP immediately a year ago on Wednesday, 23rd December 1998, when it became a problem. The problem was talking in my sleep as a direct result of the harassment from my neighbours. This occurred in a nightmare the preceding evening where I shouted in my sleep waking myself. The dream was explicitly related to the harassment and directly involved that day's events. Understanding that trying to cope with the harassment I was experiencing had become an unconscious problem emerging through the body's normal means of coping with anxiety and distress, I sought immediate medical assistance.

In the absence of my GP I made an appoint for the following week with the senior physician at the ********** ********* Practice as I felt that this problem needed immediate attention for very practical as well as personal reasons: practical in the sense that talking in my sleep could be used against me by those harassing me and personal in the sense that it reflected an overflow of distress at this situation which had been going on without relief since May 1998.

At that appointment the following Wednesday, the senior physician at the ********** ********** Practice referred me to their in-house Counsellor to explore the nature of the problem which was the retaliatory harassment I had received from notifying the authorities about child abuse, it's resulting evident distress and why I had delayed reporting the child abuse. The latter question was quite easily answered by the character of the people involved and my experience as regards their rage, violence and probable harassment during the year preceding May 1998.

I was told that the in-house Counsellor would contact me promptly early the next week after the New Year's weekend. This did not occur, and I attended the practice twice at the end of each of the following two weeks to obtain an appointment when I was finally contacted by the in-house Counsellor following the second such visit.

An appointment was arranged near the end of January which turned out to be more abusive then helpful. The essence of the problem was never addressed. Questions asked were completely irrelevant. When I tried to point out that the problem of talking in my sleep could be used against me, this was scoffed at with a derisory laugh and dismissed. The Counsellor kept asking me what I expected to gain from counselling. With the idea of gaining the ability to cope with the difficult situation and noting a practical objective if necessary for such coping I noted that legal procedures were a possibility. This met with an outright rejection and comment "I don't do that!" from the Counsellor. Further, when I explained what the senior practice physician had indicated as the reason for sending me to counselling, she seemed outraged that such was the case and asked me if the senior practice physician had really said that. I noted that yes this was what she had told me. Finally, the Counsellor dismissed me noting that she had too many people to handle and could not take me on.

I felt quite abused by this whole process and even more distress was added by the fact that I had sought medical assistance and met with harm instead of help. As I result I sent a complaint letter to the *********** ************ Practice and at first received a defensive reply from the Practice Manager. I answered this and then received a more reasonable reply. My sense of the situation was that the Counsellor was looking at prior history for depth analysis rather than addressing the immediate problem which was the sole cause of my talking in my sleep. I related as to how this might eventually surface as part of the problem, but first one must address the immediate issue and problem at hand. Only then if exhausting that analysis and understanding led to other things should depth analysis be undertak[en]. I felt that this was a waste of time and NHS funding and so indicated to the ******** ********** Practice in my complaints.

Resulting from this I received an offer by way of the Practice Manager for a 20 minute "private basis" appointment with the senior practice physician. Although I received the letter too late to attend that appointment, I indicated that I would contact them further for another. Upon reflection and noting that this was made on a "private basis", I could not understand the medical assistance available to me in such an appointment. I [text omitted] had no financial resources whatsoever. In fact my budget was as tight as possible as a result of my job search efforts and contending with eye problems (increasing myopia and a stabilised diplopia) which required that I spend part of my [income] on spectacles at that time too.

I therefore tried to change to another GP instead without immediate success. I met with refusals based upon the fact that other practices would not accept someone from the same cachement area; or I was out of the cachement area; or the waiting list was too long to see a doctor. At this same time during February 1999 the harassment became so bad that it was all I could do to cope with it and keep complete records which could be my only defense for the kind of harassment I was being subjected to. As I had correctly anticipated, they were using the fact that they could disturb my sleep and cause me to talk in my sleep just before waking in an unconscious protest of sorts [against me]. Once they had this knowledge, they harassed with glee, enthusiasm and delight at being able to cause the problem then point their finger at me for being the one responsible.

I made every effort to avoid this sleep disturbance which was largely unsuccessful. My goal was to try to make certain that I was not disturbed if possible, but I was only partially successful. I have a complete diary of all of this activity throughout the entire period of my residency in this flat from May 1996 onwards including all my activity since I normally keep such a diary for personal purposes. These reveal everything that has happened, and the order of ever increasing and progressive harassment which was provocative in the extreme but to which I did not respond at all for very specific reasons as well as not being one to harass anyone at all.

I have gone over this material to show you that I have already sought medical assistance on this matter and been refused medical treatment or a complaint response that could entail medical treatment in my case. I was left on my own to contend with the situation as best I could, and that is exactly what I have done. It has caused me great pain, anxiety and distress on a daily basis since May 1998, and has impacted my job search and professional activities in that regard on an ever increasing basis with my having sustained extensive damages to that effort this past year. I even brought this problem to the attention of the Social Services by way of the [text omitted] as early as September 1997.

Failures to find relief also through the local police, the Chief Executives of the ************ ************* ********* ********* and not the ************ who are a part of the problem and the Local Council then found me bringing this to the attention of the ************** Police Commissioner and finally the Prime Minister. These were deemed proper and appropriate correspondences seeking harassment relief which was not forthcoming. Finally, the only way left to me was the time consuming and expensive (for all) means of legal procedures through the High Court which are now at hand.

Your intervention in the problem and the manner in which it has been obtained and promulgated has served to seriously compound the harassment recently. In effect you are carrying out the destructive goals of those who have sought to disrupt my life as much as is possible and hopefully to the point of shutting it down completely. During this I have struggled as much as possible on a quite well-balanced and rational basis to maintain my personal responsibilities and address the harassment as best I could given the failures I have described above to seek assistance in doing so.

I welcome the correspondence you have finally sent to me although you have not described what it is about. By this time it is quite obvious, I should think from my perspective, what it concerns, but I feel that you do not have the whole story. In fact, you have exactly one-half of the story and the half that has been seriously distorted for reasons of personal vendetta and, more important, represent an attempt to bury the truth if at all possible and at all costs by the actions of those now committed to misleading yourselves and others which are very much in the extreme.

I am very confident that the truth will emerge intact and whole if for no other reason that far too many people really know what is going on with any number of them refusing to participate. I will be delighted to meet with the professionals at your offices at your convenience for as many meetings and for as long as it requires to get the whole truth presented to you.

I seek this method as I sought it over a year ago in order to help me better handle the situation and get on with my professional activity and re-employment search which at the age of 57 with a history of cancer, lymph oedema, recent positive biopsy and diplopia that is slowly becoming unstable now with the distress from this harassment is not made any easier. The harassment against me however must cease entirely, and I must be allowed to live in "quiet enjoyment" of my flat to get on with these responsibilities which have suffered ever increasing disruption for 20 months now.

I must state unequivocally that at no time have I harassed or engaged in any such activity with regard to my neighbours despite intense provocation to do so. Anything that has occurred has been the direct result of their harassment of me and has been an unconscious by-product of normal coping with distress in the sleep regeneration process which has been disturbed intentionally on a daily and hourly basis by my neighbours. All of my actions have been to avoid any and all harassment on my part or any such activity which might be perceived and misconstrued as such.

I have a very good understanding of this situation which might very well surprise you. I suspect that you have no idea about me and only have the one-sided, very negative comments from my neighbours which are spoken only in their own self-interest and as appropriate to their goals in driving me out of my flat for having brought to the attention of the authorities their child abuse.

Because I do understand the character of these people, I would not under any circumstances engage in any behaviour which provoked any further emotional disturbance in them or in anyway contributed to that which I have directly witnessed now for over 3.5 years. It was my goal after much consideration and thought following an acceleration of violent and abusive behaviour directed against a child who literally cried for "help" out on the balcony to bring this to the attention of the proper authorities in the hopes that the situation could be properly ameliorated.

That has failed as they have continued, now surreptitiously for the most part, to continue their hatred and rage in obsessive attention and attacks against me that defy any and all sense of reasonable proportion for even a legitimate grievance of which there is none. The child abuse in its own way continues too with now infrequent losses of control and possible physical injury. One child in particularly manifests signs still of treating other children in the way he was treated by hitting and choking them. This child's disturbance is still evident after 20 months from that initial reporting an incident of which occurred shortly before Christmas.

I hope in the light of these comments and future interviews that you will see the whole truth as it exists here in this situation. Moreover[,] I hope that you will stop immediately carrying out the harassment activity on behalf of [these] people which was initiated 20 months ago in this circumstance. As I see and experience it, you are doing exactly what they were doing then and throughout this period themselves by engaging others to act on their behalf through misrepresentations. You are acting in the extreme in ignorance of the full facts.

In particular I refer to the repeated and continuing attempts to gain access to my flat while I am present and the water sampling process. I certainly have never engaged in any criminal activity whatsoever. Please understand further that I have never used drugs nor have I ever knowingly associated with those that did. I have not had any alcohol to drink for 3.5 years. I do not even drink coffee or tea. I don't smoke. As a matter of fact I do not even have any aspirin or any other kind of commercially available drug. I just don't ever use or even have a need for them.

I am fundamentally a vegetarian and try to eat a normal, well balanced diet when allowed to cook without harassment. One of the methods was to attack my cooking by directly pounding on a wall below or constantly describing my slicing of vegetables as "too loud' which, by the way, went on for two years prior to May 1998 without a murmur of complaint as did all my other activity which is completely recorded in my diaries. The contrast of "before" and "after" is quite startling and revealing following the onset of the harassment in May 1998.

As regards the water sampling from my usage, the drainage connection has been tampered with to such a degree as to inhibit and almost stop the flow of normal drainage. Because the kitchen sink is higher than the bathtub, its water drainage (even small amounts) backs up into the bathtub bringing with it all the "sewage" bacterial growth residing in the drain pipes. This smell is obvious as is the backup water in the bathtub. This is a serious health risk to me as I have no lymph nodes under my right arm. I have had serious bacterial infections on three different occasions which have turned my right arm, shoulder and chest bright red. My former oncological surgeon had given me an anti-biotic prescription to carry around for just this purpose renewing it each year over a decade's time. I had to use it on each of these three occasions and was thankful that I already had it.

Thus, I ask you to cease and desist this life threatening water sampling activity which can cause me serious harm if not death from blood poisoning. I have notified the police about the danger of this activity when it started, but it continues as it did then.

Last but certainly not least[,] I am in no way whatsoever a threat either to myself or anyone else. No one who like myself endeavours by appropriate action to preserve and protect life could contemplate such destructive behaviour. By contrast, however, I am the one who has been subjected to threats of death and violence from those in the flat below mine. In fact as recently as 9th December 1999, the younger woman below verbally threatened [me] directly with violence. I ignored her, said nothing and entered my flat. The incident was reported to the police immediately

Please let me know by return post when and where to attend your offices for the interview you seek. The proposed time and date is fine. If this is not convenient for you, I would prefer a morning appointment.

Yesterday I met with Dr *********** ********* [aka PPQ] regarding a matter involving stalking and harassing where I was the victim of those whom I had earlier reported to the authorities for child abuse. This was the second of two meetings the first of which was with Dr ******** ********* [aka BHH] on 13th January 1999.

Dr ********** [aka PPQ] provided a prescription for Zyprexa (Olanzapine) urging me to fill and use it for two weeks. I asked him for a diagnosis and prognosis in writing which he said he could not give as it was not developed at present, and he pointed out that I was suffering from anxiety. I explained that I needed this written information for legal reasons regarding the ongoing stalking and harassment to which I was being subjected.

In urging me to go ahead with treatment without the diagnosis and prognosis, Dr ******** [PPQ] said that he could do better after our next session in two weeks time. I agreed saying "fair enough". This was before I had any idea what Zyprexa (Olanzapine) was as a drug. It was far more than an anxiety drug and "is indicated for the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders."

http://www.mentalhealth.com/drug/p30-o02.html#Head_1 (Click on link at the end of this letter)

I was astounded. By prescribing Zyprexa (Olanzapine) apparently Dr ********** [aka PPQ] has made a diagnosis and embarked upon a course of treatment without fully informing me of all the details to which I have a right to know. Further in the enclosed information sheet which came with the drug was the following statement: "Zyprexa is used to treat a disease with symptoms such as hearing, seeing things which are not there, mistaken beliefs, unusual suspiciousness, and becoming withdrawn. People with the disease may also feel depressed, anxious or tense." This constitutes a diagnosis.

It is a diagnosis to which I strongly object and a course of treatment of which I do not approve because it does not fit the circumstances of my situation. The harassment to which I am subjected is mostly sleep disturbance and deprivation which is facilitated by surveillance devices commonly known and used such as infrared and radar imagining equipment. It is easy to see where such a diagnoses is derived given the terms as stated in the drug packaging as noted above, but my meticulous observations, direct experience and continuously kept diary notes and logs reflect a factual base for the utilisation of such equipment that is highly correlated with the sleep disturbance and deprivation harassment.

I do not agree at all that schizophrenia, manic-depression and related psychotic disorders have anything to do with my situation and believe that this drug is not appropriate to my situation and experience. I used the example for Dr ************ [aka PPQ] of a hamster or gerbil in a small flat cage with bars all around the outside where observers could see the animal at all times. When the animal shut its eyes and one of the observers hit the top and/or bottom of the cage, what would that do to that animal I asked Dr *********** [aka PPQ] rhetorically? I did not answer but believe that the correct answer would be that a tired animal would result.

If you observed and interviewed this animal after several nights and days of such sleep disturbance you might also see anxiety and an exhausted animal. The proper cure for such a situation would be rest and the removal of the sleep disturbance and deprivation activity. I said the same thing to Dr *********** [aka BHH] in our 13th January 2000 interview. He mentioned that he wanted to provide symptomatic relief by means of drugs, and I demurred stating that I did not believe in that and felt that addressing the cause of the harassment was the correct approach. Frankly, such an approach when the cause and effect are easily discernable is absurd in my opinion. Why treat symptoms when the cause can be addressed?

Dr ********* [aka BHH] pointed out in the course of that previous interview that he was limited in what he could do. Yes, this is understandable and quite true. It is nothing that makes your work any the less however. I had pointed out in my original fax to Dr *********** [aka BHH] and ********** ************ that this was really a legal problem and not a full medical one although it had medical aspects. I outlined my experience of one year ago with my GP's surgery and a councillor which was unfortunate and abusive. I did it to explicitly outline misdirected help and the harm that I incurred as a result.

I feel the same thing is happening once again. Professionals only see [their] own way of looking at a problem. A year ago it was a [counsellor] who did an evaluation. This year it is two psychiatrists who are seeing the problem in their own terms and not in my terms of both my situation and my total life experience. In some sense this patient knows what is needed and has so far been unable to get it. I believe it is a question of listening to the patient which has not occurred yet in full and will not occur if the current path of treatment is pursued as a direction.

My problem is sleep deprivation and the anxiety and distress which result from the constant hitting of the floor above and walls and ceiling below my flat especially at times when I lay down to go to sleep. The common sense and immediate solution to the problem is to eliminate the blows to the top and bottom of my flat as would be true of a hamster/gerbil in its cage so treated. The anxiety arises out of anticipating that when sleep is attempted, the blows will occur. The distress occurs for largely the same reason but becomes more problematical over an extended period of time such as this situation where the body is subjected to continuing stress that becomes distress in the light of the body's inability to respond effectively on its own to cure the source of the problem.

That's where the unconscious comes in and where it works out this distress (and anxiety to a degree) during sleep periods. This is one of the reasons why sleep is so essential as it is a brain rejuvenator. When this is interfered with, the automatic, unconscious response is dreams (and nightmares) with attendant talking or trying to talk in one's sleep while being woken as a means of protest. This is something that does not occur during conscious waking hours because in my case I dismiss the blows when they occur and ignore them. This does not eliminate them from the unconscious though which acts as the body's "reality" function to such disturbances. What occurs is that the distress cup runneth over and dreams and nightmares appear on their own to help alleviate this excess of distress.

I pointed this out to Dr *********** [aka PPQ] and indicated that drugs have the effect of denying [the occurrence of] this natural function of the brain which can lead to a further buildup of distress and greater problems subsequently. He agreed as by this time we all know that it is hasardous to suppress the unconscious as we will pay a higher price for doing so at a future date. Therefore, not only do I object to the prescriptive therapy offered as inappropriate at worst and not tied to a properly articulated diagnosis at best, but it also derails the body's natural function in releasing tension, anxiety and distress which are a result of sleep disturbance and deprivation. This is a hasard which a mild problem like sleep disturbance and deprivation could and should avoid.

There is a significant element missing in the evaluation process that I just underwent with Drs ********* [aka PPQ] and ********** [aka BHH]: the information that pertains to the individual patient and his/her life experience. Dr ********* [aka BHH] did touch on the formative years but ignored (due to lack of time perhaps) the middle achievement years for their knowledge accumulation and demonstrated success. These cannot be ignored in situations like mine as they reflect overall ability, coordination, synthesis and knowledge gain that flows into the rest of the individual's life. It might be unusual and again it might not be unusual for you to come into contact with someone like myself. I believe it is important to regard these factors in the diagnosis process, and I do not believe that has been done because you do not know about them since I have not been asked or explained. They relate directly to the ability to function properly, perceptively and to accrue information well while reaching a proper conclusion. The implied diagnosis in my drug treatment prescription impute a negative regarding this function.

I do not like to talk about these things as externals because I do not think they have much relevance and meaning to the situation at hand. However, I believe noting that these factors exist in a human being[']s background when taken for [their] internal meaning have great relevance to the diagnostic process at hand. What has been omitted so far is the fact that after I served my military obligation, I returned to university at ************** and obtained a BA in Philosophy and French followed by an MBA in finance, economics and international business. These were accomplishment[s] achieved by my own endeavour which adds import to them and the fact that they were done as ends in themselves and not as a means to an end.

As regards experience in addition to my Communication Intelligence analysis activity, I am also a computer manufacturer trained systems engineer which lends more credence to my observations as regards the problem of surveillance technology. In following that over the decades with continuing IT work I have utilised micro computer technology extensively since 1980 and have been noted professionally in such a capacity. That capacity is one of financial, economic and security analysis where I achieved the distinction of being recognised as one of the best pension fund managers in North American and the UK during the early Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan years. My great achievement was here in the UK where during the devastating recession in the early 1980s I was able to deliver management that enabled the labour force to suspend its 5% personal pension contribution thereby giving it a rise [effective pay raise] as well as the corporate pension contribution in a significant automotive supply company. That was the point of management which required years (a decade) of dedicated effort and coordination. My life is a matter of public record as this activity and achievement was reflected extensively in the financial press.

I offer this here to note that my ability to analyse in any environment and with any set of variables has always been successful because I was and am able to understand and process information properly and effectively. That is why these two areas of continuing education and middle years achievement are relevant and important here. If I had any previous problem with schizophrenia, manic-depression or psychosis, these achievements would never have been accomplished.

This brings us back to the problem at hand. I require a fully written diagnosis and prognosis with regard to the current situation that reflects all aspects of my current environmental experience and my individual abilities and achievements. Most important in this context then are the details of my current experience. These have largely been given short shrift, and I feel that they are the major factors to be considered especially as regards to inductive reasoning and arriving at conclusions or general statements which are subject to revision. This is, of course, the scientific method which I apply to understand and evaluating my current stalking and harassment experience. I feel that this has been largely ignored as irrelevant by Drs ********* [aka PPQ] and ************ [aka BHH].

Instead, from my perspective, they appear to me to have weighed heavily factors which are prominent in their general psychiatric experience for applying to patients on a general basis. I take exception to this as I feel that the implied diagnosis from the prescripted drug treatment does not address the solution of the problem at hand for me nor does it adequately reflect my individual character. Naturally, I would object to such implied characterisation, but I think I have solid grounds for doing so. Therefore, I look forward to a complete evaluation from Drs ********* [aka PPQ] and ********** [aka BHH] with a fully written diagnosis and prognosis which can be used for legal purposes as well.

I do not know if such a diagnosis is available at present, but until it can be made available I will not embark on the prescribed drug treatment regimen as I think it is in error. I believe that the patient has a right to full participation in this process and feel that I have much to contribute to the ultimate determination of a diagnosis. The prognosis is another matter and one which may or may not lend itself to understanding and quantification.

I also want to point out an article in The Lancet, Vol 354, 23rd October 1999, page 1435 entitled "Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function". This article puts paid to the notion that sleep debt has no adverse effect on health. Sleep is as valuable to the body's proper functioning as to the brain's rejuvenation each night. It's conclusions include: 1) "sleep debt . . . if maintained chronically, could have long-term adverse effects on health [where] "decreased carbohydrate tolerance and increased sympathetic tone are . . . risk factors for . . . 2) insulin resistance; 3) obesity; 4) hypertension; and 5) memory impairment." (page 1438).

I think it is critically important to view my experience since May 1998 with its sleep debt as one which has adversely impacted my health. The factors involved are metabolic and endocrine variables which must be considered and taken into account in any treatment regimen. The use of Zyprexa has side effects with regard to diabetes and glaucoma. I am concerned about these in light of the sleep debt experience and especially with regard to my diplopia whose treatment commenced in May 1998. It is equally critical to note that the problems associated with sleep debt may not have any long lasting psychological problems at all that a few weeks of solid sleep each night would alleviate, but I am equally concerned with the whole body health impact as well as the brain. I believe these need equal scrutiny in this situation and are not being addressed.

I look forward to your response to this complaint as regards to what will be forthcoming and when.

Yours sincerely

/s/ Gary D Chance

PS I have not voluntarily sought assistance at ******* ********* Hospital but have been called in as a result of someone's apparent complaint. My purpose in attending the interviews is to broaden your physicians' understanding of the entire situation so that they may deal with the source of the problem. I hope you will forgive me for saying that I do not believe that throwing drugs at this problem is an effective solution for me as has been advanced so far. In this case I look at it as a cop out. I believe that drugs are a last resort and have been drug free all my life except for the odd instances of necessary medication which have been few and far between.

My subsequent reply letter dated 1st March 2000 to Dr ******* ******* (aka PPQ) in reply to his threatening and menacing letter in an attempt to coerce me into a further visit after I had filed my complaint above when that complaint had not even been acknowledged as received let alone dealt with including a reply

The Honourable ****************** Member of Parliament ********************************* House of Commons Saturday, 18th November 2000 Abuse of Power Part 2D: Repression by Psychiatry

3. My subsequent reply letter dated 1st March 2000 to Dr ********* ********** [aka PPQ] in reply to his threatening and menacing letter in an attempt to coerce me into a further visit after I had filed my complaint noted in (2) above when that complaint had not even been acknowledged as received let alone dealt with and replied to

I am in receipt of your letter dated 25th February 2000. I shall not attend your proposed meeting today at noon nor do I propose to schedule another further meeting with you under the circumstances that exist in this environment and as a result of your conduct about which I have filed a complaint with the Chief Executive of *********** ********** Hospital until such time as these matter[s] are properly resolved legally.

I was due an acknowledgement of receipt for the complaint against you within two days of its receipt and a reply within four weeks which ends tomorrow. To date I have received neither.

As you have noted and as has been transmitted to you during this period, the correspondence to Mr ************** (a copy of which was also sent to the Borough's Chief Executive ************* ************* in each instance) outlines the ongoing stalking and harassment activity for the three weeks since 1st February 2000. This is consistent with and a continuation of my experience in one degree or another since May 1998.

This activity must cease and provide me with the rest I need to deal adequately with my responsibilities. At present there have only been a couple recent nights of abatement in it. This must be consistent and dependable so as to restore my confidence that it has ended. As has been clearly stated in my first meeting with your colleague, you have no control over this and can do little. Thus, there is little point in discussing the factors causing the distress since they are these external ones over which I have no personal control, but others such as Mr *********** and Mr ************ do along with the courts.

I find it most unfortunate that you have to resort to coercion and intimidation to secure my presence, and I will not tolerate nor succumb to such threats. Any activity in which you initiate and engage to enter my flat will be deemed illegal under the circumstances as there is no legal foundation whatsoever for such entry and will only serve to continue the stalking and harassment initiated by those whose behaviour continues to be clearly and explicitly recorded and documented.

First and foremost in this situation you must understand that I have in no way whatsoever engaged in any activity which would even appear as stalking or harassment and most certainly have not engaged in any activity which I have noted that I have been falsely accused of. I have been the victim entirely of an effort to accuse me of activity which I have not done as a method by which those stalking and harassing me are attempting to obscure [by] their own behaviour.

I learned this very early in the summer of 1998, and it was recorded in detail for Messrs ************ and ********* from which point it escalated in its false accusations and simultaneous direct harassment against me with the results which have been described and were brought to the attention of the *********** *********** Police Commissioner at the end of October 1998. These have continued ever since with complete and thorough documentation throughout this period as you have seen so far for the first three weeks of February [2000]. These paint a very sad picture for a failure of law enforcement, local Government and housing management.

I have not threatened anyone nor do I present a threat to anyone in any manner as I have done my best to address this horrendous problem legally and appropriately first and foremost to those who have a direct responsibility in the management of this *************** with whom I have a contract and the local Government. This was then extended to the *********** ************ Police Commissioner and then the Prime Minister due to the nature of the activity. These were appropriate and necessary applications to the respective authorities as required to bring about the end of the stalking and harassment directed against me for having acted in a legal and very careful manner with respect to possible criminal activity I witnessed directly [and properly reported].

As a result I have been the object of death threats and threats of violence from the summer of 1998 onwards until the present with the continuing stalking and harassment bearing the fear of those threats continuously. It is I who have been on the receiving end of threats and would never consider making such verbal threats let alone even contemplate such actions myself in any form.

Instead, I have circumscribed my life to such a degree in its every aspect to make certain that nothing I do could even be construed as the appearance of any such behaviour. I reduced my noises to absolutely nothing, my presence to the most low profile possible and altered activity so as to avoid the harassment that I was getting. This worked quite well enabling me to get on with my life and responsibilities.

At the same time this enabled me to fully document all that behaviour that was directed against me or intended to disturb and cause distress with the objective which was clearly stated by those below who initiated and carried out this activity to drive me from my home. By removing myself completely from any form of possible contribution all the excessive and explicit activity I recorded was noted as being clearly or suspect with regard to stalking and harassment directed at me. As noted above I simultaneously sought its end by application to those in positions of responsibility to do so. The record is most complete and accurate in this regard and clearly demonstrates both the absence of my activity and the complete and thorough intentional activity of others to drive me from my home by means of constant harassment and stalking.

I have never wavered from my position to achieve a legal and fair resolution of this activity directed against me by ultimately applying to the courts which has been prevented up to this point by the very nature of the stalking and harassment itself which can be deemed as intended to prevent me from doing so.

The stalking and harassment throughout the period have aggravated the medical and health problems which I have also sought to mitigate most especially the diplopia and lymph oedema. My actions during this period can also be explained as trying to reduce the impact of these problems and have been successful to a degree with the diplopia in 1998 at least. The lymph oedema continues to be a[n] extreme risk to my right arm.

The impact upon my eyes, however, has been negative with the most recent extreme activity directed against me having an adverse impact. I have just recently sought medical assistance in this matter which has noted adverse developments necessitating a further referral back to hospital for a thorough examination and diagnosis. I shall be occupied with attending to this immediate threat to my eyesight as well during this period while trying to alleviate the direct cause of the stress and fatigue that have contributed directly to it once more despite my best efforts to mitigate this problem. Those efforts at mitigation continue.

My two meetings with yourself and your colleague have not indicated any direct benefit to me in mitigating the cause of my distress and fatigue and despite representations to the contrary have only further aggravated the problem since your initial unannounced attempted entry to my flat in early December 1998 in this high crime area. I have concluded by my attendance at the two meetings with yourself and your colleague that you were not evaluating me in any meaningful sense, that your mind was already made up and that you were simply seeking points to support your already formed conclusion. Thus, you were not acting in my interest but the interest of others namely the complainant who had sent my correspondence to the Prime Minister to the ********** ************ ************ ********** *********.

[NB I took this as a directly repressive measure against dissent for having written as a letter of complaint to the Prime Minister which was clearly evidence by its being in my medical folder as the basis of my being summoned to *********** ************* Hospital. This was clearly using psychiatry as a means of repress[ing] complaint and dissent.]

Despite indicating to me by your colleague that you were trying to help me, he asked if I did not think it was not time for me to move. I was most alarmed by this question and suggestion since it revealed that you were acting in the interest to those harassing me rather than my interest. In fact, this subject was discussed [at] length where I denied any such intention. Your colleague did not address the problem but stated that he intended to address the symptoms of the problem. I felt this was a mistake and said so at that time.

[NB This unlawful act committed by Dr ******** [aka BHH] on 13th January 2000 in asking me to move out of my home was also accompanied by as a statement that "money might be available" it I were to vacate my home. This was an outrageous thing to do in a medical environment that was clearly unlawful and an offence which did me further harm thus also violating the fundamental obligation and responsibility of the physician to do no harm.]

You have carried out this position with which I do not agree. You have failed to understand the situation or even make an effort [to] do so in our meeting. Instead you dismissed out of hand things with which you did not agree or comprehend and prescribed treatment without providing an explicitly requested diagnosis. Given the high risk characteristics of my health problems two of which have been noted here, I was very sceptical of any treatment until it [was] fully understood by me. [In] fact I have been advised to undergo no treatment unless it is by my written consent which I fully intend to do only after being fully informed of any such treatment and obtaining at least one second [independent] opinion.

Your threats to enter the flat by force only add to my reluctance to comply with your request at the present time. Such reliance on the threat of force belies the validity of your position and the essential practice of medicine in which the physician is required to do no harm. If carried out, it will be harmful and most certainly not helpful. It will help those seeking to remove me from my home.

Furthermore, legally it is entirely unjustified and untenable. The only basis upon which you can successfully legally enter the premises by force is if I am deemed to be as a threat to others or to myself both of which are patently untrue and are refuted ad infinitum by my actions throughout my residency in the premises for the past almost four years, my actions during the duration of this most difficult of problems and most certainly by the entirety of my life with its explicit behaviour and actions which have been life and property protecting and preserving to the core despite adverse circumstance from time to time.

Therefore, if you carry out your threat, it will be an illegal action, and you will do so only to be included in my continuing legal attempts to address the problem. I already have serious problems with your conduct and will add this to those and seek a legal remedy as permitted and provided by law.

At the end of the day, however, you must realise that you are proposing to fulfill the objective of those who have been harassing me directly and who have been making false claims against me in order to discredit me and cause you to act as your are acting and threaten to act. If you continue on your present course of proposed behaviour, you will be carrying out the already stated objective of those who are now stalking and harassing me.

I want to also point out that the local *********** with whom I do not have a contract and who has explicitly disavowed in writing to me any connection with the ********** of which Mr ************* is the Chief Executive has been a direct participant in the stalking and harassment. The ************* has provided the foundation and moral support that encouraged and aided the tenants to continue to harass and stalk me. If you act in consort with the ***********, you will be acting directly with those who are stalking and harassing me to seek my illegal eviction. This is why my correspondence since May 1998 including the initial child abuse information was directed to the Council and ************* Chief Executives and not the ************* and has always been the case as this matter unfolded.

I hope that you understand that this is as a complicated housing management issue which must be addressed legally as well. Its nature is such that those carrying out the stalking and harassment feel free to do so under the auspices of the ************. If you conspire with the ************* management to bring about the objective of those harassing and stalking me to drive me out of my flat, then you will be subject to the same legal redress as already described. But even worse from a professional point of [view] you will be using the practice of medicine to carry out repressive and extra legal activity which are designed to deny my own personal legal and human rights which residing in the privacy of my own home permit me to do to the extend [that] they are not already completely compromised by the ongoing surveillance as described in the documents in your possession already.

It is my intention to bring this matter into the court system for a full and fair adjudication of the disputed issues as provided by law. Your forced entry into the flat will deny me that course of action and stop me legally addressing this issue at an especially critical time when it must be addressed without further unnecessary delay. Those engaged in the stalking and harassment seek such an intervention and disruption in my ability to legally pursue this matter. If you act as threatened, you will be illegally accomplishing their objective. While it then might take me some time to address the matter, it will neverthless be addressed, and I am confident as I am now that the truth of the matter will emerge eventually.

I trust that you will not interfere in my life further, and that you will allow me the ability to address the problem including my health problems at its source by legal means which you can do nothing to assist at present by your own admission. Any action you might take as described will only help the illegal actions of those who are currently seeking my removal from my home by extra legal methods and means which deny me the right of a legal response in a court of law.

Yours sincerely

/s/ Gary D Chance

NB I faxed the above letter to Dr PPQ on this Wednesday morning about 0900 on 1st March 2000. When I returned home that evening about 5:45 PM, my telephone was completely out. The line was dead. This impacted the total ISDN BT (British Telecom) Home Highway service which had been installed on or about 6th November 1998.

The circumstances of such a fault were mysterious to say the least including the fact that I was given a run-around with false reasons for the fault by British Telecom for several days including its character and repair. That activity was very strange and led to my suspicions as to the precise nature of what was actually happening. After seven days of this, I cancelled my telephone service altogether for failure to repair filing a complaint directly with British Telecom's CEO outlining my completely logged experience with them.

Since 1st March 2000, I have not had a telephone at all and have done all my daily Internet activity at a local Internet shop. Very fortunately it has been an excellent one which had just opened nearby at the beginning of February 2000. I had actually been using this Internet shop that month so it was just a question of continuing that usage after 1st March 2000. I have subsequently been able to use the facilities of this Internet shop to accomplish all that I had before despite the inconvenience.

The effect of such a telephone fault that was not repaired immediately occurring in the overall circumstances and in its own mysterious way which begged questions was to deny me all the communications which I needed for faxing, Email and Internet access activity. This matter remains open for a complete investigation as to what actually occurred as regards to the true nature of the fault which denied me my ISDN telephone service.

My experience with those below my flat who have sought every means and ability to disrupt, disturb and destroy all my activity also causes this event to fall into that suspicious category as the telephone wire runs through the wall below my flat and through that flat's wall below me as well. As was well noted by this time, they had been able to watch me write and send all the documents I did by fax as well as everything else I did as regards to communications the Prime Minister's fax/letter being one of the key examples. Their desire to stop this was obvious.

It is a resonable suspicion to focus attention on the fact that they might very well have damaged the wiring intentionally to prevent such activity given all my correspondence until that time. Much else in that regard has happened that is not noted in this website as yet. I have too much direct evidence with respect to these people making every effort possible to deny me all my activity not to be suspicious of this as well. This is one of the key activities now going on with the ability to hack the computer systems directly by wireless communications to disrupt, disturb and destroy my work on this computers.

One person associated with the flat below has expressed a repeated interest in stopping me creating the diary/logs in the notebook computer as had been already accomplished with the desktop computer which could be locked out at will or even specific programmes such as the video effectively hung up while in use to prevent me looking out my front window and collecting evidence. Many instances of this have been explicitly noted as "ordered" and occurring.

This particular person has been so obsessively committed to the criminal stalking and harassment activity during all these years as to have noted an unscheduled attempted repair visit by the BT repairman and commented to him about my presence. This degree of knowledge and association with the telephone fault problem adds to the suspicious character of all that occurred at this time. It is a question of adding up all the patterns of activity for a full investigation.

Now the notebook computer's operation has actually been interferred with as well to the extent that I cannot use it. Thus, the overall activity which has impacted my ability to deal with the problem legally over these years is strongly suspected to be part of a consistent and verifiable pattern of events to deny me usage of these computers. Such destructive activity against my telephone communications remains to be investigated.

An Email to Radio 4's PM programme last 9th March 2000 entitled "Doctoring". Naturally in the context of this situation and my experience that word is a clear "double entendre" with regard to both the medical profession and "doctoring" a situation as I have experienced.

The Honourable ****************** Member of Parliament ********************************* House of Commons Saturday, 18th November 2000 Abuse of Power Part 2E: Repression by Psychiatry

4. My Email to Radio 4's PM programme last 9th March 2000 entitled "Doctoring". Naturally in the context of this situation and my experience that word is a clear "double entendre" with regard to both the medical profession and "doctoring" a situation as I have experienced:

Nothing could be more important than full and complete communication between doctor and patient. Your broadcast yesterday from the cancer patient in Paris highlighting the resistance from doctors against revealing full disclosure about treatment and its risks are all too typical and tragic.

Patients and doctors need to work completely together on a fully informed basis for mutual understanding and the success of treatment.

The hocus pocus from the medical profession to hide its ingnorance and incompetence must come to an end. Good doctors have no problem with this. Bad doctors use it to hide behind illusionary medical treatment reinforced by risky pill pushing and treatment that might oftentimes be completely irrelevant to the patient's needs and do harm instead.

Doctors need to listen to patients and communicate straighforward information to them about diagnosis and treatment. If this cannot be done, then it means the doctor does not know what he is doing and will not certainly listen to his/her patient. Worse he might even be trying to manipulate an outcome to cover his own ignorance and incompetence.

I was recently prescribed a treatment involving medication by pills from a hospital doctor who refused to provide a diagnosis. I was reluctant to fill the prescription but did so anyway. When I looked at the Internet and the medication's enclosed brochure discribing what it was actually for and its potential side effects, I refused to take the medication as it presented a very specific risk for me. I promptly filed a complaint against this doctor.

I was supposed to get an acknowledgement of receipt of the complaint within two days and a full reply in four weeks neither of which have I received as required. Pill pushing doctors who use medication to coverup their own inability to practice medicine should be called to task, but there is a general conspiracy in the medical and hospital world to coverup the doctors right to maintain hocus pocus medicine.

Only if patients fight for their right to be fully informed and submit to treatment only by consent can this practice by superstitious "witch doctors" be prevented which might harm rather than help patients.

It's people who keep themselves well with the help of the medical profession not the other way round as most good doctors realise. There needs to be a complete dialogue when medical needs arise which they invariably do when the medical profession can assist the patient. Let's debunk the mystique of medical knowledge and its practice as most medical students are taught continuously anyway.

PS For a very interesting read on the subject see Dr Lewis Thomas' "Lives of a Cell". Written by this former head of the Sloan Kettering Memorial Cancer Hospital in New York City (the equivalent of the Royal Marsden) it is his essays from a journal which are published without condescending language and are magically communicative. So much so that it became a best selling book. Dig up the New Yorker article about him as well published in that magazine [2nd January 1978 written by Jeremy Bernstein] for a brilliant overview of him, his book and his thinking. There are a lot of great people all over the world in the medical profession. It's time to let the public in on it too! It can be done. Only the "Medicos" are keeping it obscure.

Reply letter of 21st January 2000 to the Home Office section dealing with police complaints. It was in response to their letter dated 19th January 2000 which was a reply to my fax to the Prime Minister on 21st December 1999. It is a reiteration of reasons why I would not file a complaint against the police at that time and goes into various areas and issues which need to be addressed and why they should be. It describes the foundation and reason for addressing the source and truth of the problems and issues.

The Honourable ****************** Member of Parliament ********************************* House of Commons Saturday, 18th November 2000 Abuse of Power Part 2F: Repression by Psychiatry

5. My reply letter of 21st January 2000 to the Home Office section dealing with police complaints. It was in response to their letter dated 19th January 2000 which was a reply to my fax to the Prime Minister on 21st December 1999. It is a reiteration of reasons why I would not file a complaint against the police at that time and goes into various areas and issues which need to be addressed and why they should be. It describes the foundation and reason for addressing the source and truth of the problems and issues. .

Thank you for your letter of 19th January 2000 in response to mine of 21st December 1999 to the Prime Minister. I am sorry that these keep getting forwarded to the Home Office and yourselves and regret taking up your time with a second similar response. There are several issues which I want to address simply for your information then hopefully you will not be bothered by this again although I did address another fax to the Prime Minister on 29th December 1999.

First, I do have a complaint against the police, but it would be counterproductive for me to spend any time on it at present as it would not solve my immediate problem as far as I can see and would be a distraction and waste of time for all concerned.

Second, I cannot spend any time on it at present until the surveillance I have described which is in civilian hands is brought to a complete halt. It makes a mockery of any attempt I make to formulate and transmit any information about this series of problems when it is read and misused by those whom the complaint is about. I do not know whether law enforcement agencies are behind this or not, but that is not the primary issue. The simple fact of total privacy invasion is the primary issue [as is] the fact that my neighbours use it for harassment purposes a result of which is to deny me the ability to properly address the problem as is occurring right in this instance.

Third, this is a matter for the Prime Minister as Chief Civil Servant due to the complexity of the interlocking governmental departments and their complete failure to function properly in this matter. This involves the Social Services, several aspects of Local Government, ************ management as well as the ********* ********** Police too so that to send this to you is not a proper attempt by the Government to address the problem but a means whereby it can be sidetracked and obscured. Filing a complaint against the police at this point would be absurd given the entire circumstance.

Furthermore I think that the police have a very difficult job to do in the first place and are unnecessarily burdened by other activity which might not be appropriately deemed within their area of responsibility. That is part of the problem noted by implication in my original letter of 23rd September 1999 to the Prime Minister. It may very well be unreasonable to expect the police to undertake everything in this world that no one else wants to handle and thereby come under unjustified expectations and criticism. I want to make certain all is very clear and well articulated before I file a complaint against the police if it is warranted at the end of the day.

This is a very complex problem but a critically important one that must be addressed thoroughly and competently by everyone involved. It is very, very difficult to sit on the outside of this situation looking in and understand the truth especially where there are those who would misrepresent, bully and badger in order to gain an illegal end. I am on the inside and looking out. I know the truth of the situation which those on the outside looking in cannot as yet fully comprehend. As a result so far great abuses of the law have occurred up to and including the Mental Health Statutes. I am in the process of endeavouring to work my way back through these misapplications of the law to provide both sides of the story. I firmly believe that the truth will hold sway eventually since far too many people know what it is for it to be kept hidden.

I am faced, however, with those who would rush to an extreme resolution of this situation in hopes of hiding the truth and succeed with their illegal activity. As a result I am seeking legal assistance from several solicitors at the moment in this complex situation as there are several areas of law to be addressed with regard to the violations of my human rights by surveillance, harassment and mental health from which both criminal and civil tort remedies exist. Some law in these areas are new and provide excellent protection for victims such as myself. Where there have been such areas that the police have failed to adequately investigate or denied my providing information about, then I will file an appropriate complaint in due course.

First and foremost, though, is my paramount need to address through the courts the surveillance issue utilised by my civilian neighbours to bring that to an absolute halt so that I might go on with a private and confidential activity on behalf of myself in addressing all the issues concerned without further fear of the perversion of the course of justice which I have experienced in the past and which is occurring at this moment. If the police, Government and Home Secretary are helpless in addressing this key issue, then my only alternative is the High Court since I have and am suffering significant personal injury as a result.

Please accept my apologies for your being sent this second fax as it was an informative fax to the Prime [Minister] among others regarding a situation where I feel there have been significant abuses of legal powers from those in positions of responsibility who have allowed themselves to be bullied and badgered into illegal actions. As regards recent outright criminal activity, I have sent that to the police. These were instances of direct harassment on 9th December 1999 and 13th January 2000 and an indirect harassment on 18th December 1999. These were a death threat, threats of violence and general interference with my free access to the premises. The latter instance is one such letter dated 21st December 1999 which is now in your hands.

It is important to note that on 13th January 2000 I was stalked and yelled at as the "one who keeps calling the police." In this environment this is the cardinal sin: to report criminal activity to the police. This is why I am being harassed, and the police, ************** management, local Government and *********** *********** Authority are apparently supporting this harassment wittingly or unwittingly. I do not keep calling the police and have done so quite infrequently and only in serious instances when I have been so instructed by the Social Services who originally called the police with regard to the child abuse problem brought to their attention. I have called the police in an assault/rape incident which involved a close neighbour (I eventually learned) and a rage incident which involved those who were the child abusers (which I did not know at the time of calling the police). These were legitimate emergency calls which are now a part of the harassment retaliation among other issues of ********** management regarding health and safety.

I hope you understand that this is a situation worth fighting for to get it right so that the Government and all law enforcement agencies can function properly in these difficult situations in the future. The Home Secretary has said in the not to distant past words to the effect that people should "get involved". I heard an interview on Radio 4 [Today/PM] where he described an incident where he talked with some lads about throwing stones over the fence from a tube station I believe. He was not advocating "Have a go" activity but merely suggesting that people should act in a responsible way when they witness crime or anti-social conduct. I have done that as I always have in my life very carefully and appropriately. This time it has brought the most intense retaliation imaginable from those who have committed illegal, criminal and anti-social acts having reached such proportions that it is entirely justified with regard to being brought to the Prime Minister's attention.

For this same reason it should be brought to the Home Secretary's attention, and I request that you do that by means of this letter. There are key issues here which will be key issues of Government and Law in the 21st Century and must be addressed with all the ability and competence that is available.

Sincerely yours

/s/ Gary D Chance

PS Please note further that my character and history are spotless. I have never taken drugs nor had anything to do with anyone that did. I don't even drink coffee or tea, smoke and have had not alcohol for 3.75 years. I have never engaged in any criminal activity and certainly have had no dealings with anyone who has. I have worked closely with the police in other communities with regard to crime and have fought corruption when it became known to me. I have had no problems with the ********* ********** Police in the 5.5 years prior to my move to this location 3.75 years ago. In fact, my experience with them was just the opposite. I had the highest regard and respect for the job that they did as far as I saw it first hand in several instances. My problems with the ********** ********* Police began when moving to this location and were brought to the attention of the *********** ************* Police Commissioner as I thought appropriate at the times these problems occurred. I have an advanced graduate degree and have served in the military where I worked in Communications Intelligence having had a Top Secret Cryptographic security clearance. My feet are firmly on the ground as regards my observation of and knowledge about the surveillance which I have personally observed and described in my letter of 23rd September 1999 to the Prime Minister. There is no justification whatsoever for subjecting me to any official surveillance and invoking the Mental Health Act for reporting my experiences to the Prime Minister as that letter to him of 23rd September 1999 was in my Mental Health file when I visited a psychiatrist for the first time at the ******** ********** Hospital last week [13th January 2000] upon written request.

cc The Rt Honourable Tony Blair, Prime Minister By Fax *************

Reply letter of 21st January 2000 to the Home Office section dealing with police complaints. It was in response to their letter dated 19th January 2000 which was a reply to my fax to the Prime Minister on 21st December 1999. It is a reiteration of reasons why I would not file a complaint against the police at that time and goes into various areas and issues which need to be addressed and why they should be. It describes the foundation and reason for addressing the source and truth of the problems and issues.

The Honourable ****************** Member of Parliament ********************************* House of Commons Saturday, 18th November 2000 Abuse of Power Part 2F: Repression by Psychiatry

5. My reply letter of 21st January 2000 to the Home Office section dealing with police complaints. It was in response to their letter dated 19th January 2000 which was a reply to my fax to the Prime Minister on 21st December 1999. It is a reiteration of reasons why I would not file a complaint against the police at that time and goes into various areas and issues which need to be addressed and why they should be. It describes the foundation and reason for addressing the source and truth of the problems and issues. .

Thank you for your letter of 19th January 2000 in response to mine of 21st December 1999 to the Prime Minister. I am sorry that these keep getting forwarded to the Home Office and yourselves and regret taking up your time with a second similar response. There are several issues which I want to address simply for your information then hopefully you will not be bothered by this again although I did address another fax to the Prime Minister on 29th December 1999.

First, I do have a complaint against the police, but it would be counterproductive for me to spend any time on it at present as it would not solve my immediate problem as far as I can see and would be a distraction and waste of time for all concerned.

Second, I cannot spend any time on it at present until the surveillance I have described which is in civilian hands is brought to a complete halt. It makes a mockery of any attempt I make to formulate and transmit any information about this series of problems when it is read and misused by those whom the complaint is about. I do not know whether law enforcement agencies are behind this or not, but that is not the primary issue. The simple fact of total privacy invasion is the primary issue [as is] the fact that my neighbours use it for harassment purposes a result of which is to deny me the ability to properly address the problem as is occurring right in this instance.

Third, this is a matter for the Prime Minister as Chief Civil Servant due to the complexity of the interlocking governmental departments and their complete failure to function properly in this matter. This involves the Social Services, several aspects of Local Government, ************ management as well as the ********* ********** Police too so that to send this to you is not a proper attempt by the Government to address the problem but a means whereby it can be sidetracked and obscured. Filing a complaint against the police at this point would be absurd given the entire circumstance.

Furthermore I think that the police have a very difficult job to do in the first place and are unnecessarily burdened by other activity which might not be appropriately deemed within their area of responsibility. That is part of the problem noted by implication in my original letter of 23rd September 1999 to the Prime Minister. It may very well be unreasonable to expect the police to undertake everything in this world that no one else wants to handle and thereby come under unjustified expectations and criticism. I want to make certain all is very clear and well articulated before I file a complaint against the police if it is warranted at the end of the day.

This is a very complex problem but a critically important one that must be addressed thoroughly and competently by everyone involved. It is very, very difficult to sit on the outside of this situation looking in and understand the truth especially where there are those who would misrepresent, bully and badger in order to gain an illegal end. I am on the inside and looking out. I know the truth of the situation which those on the outside looking in cannot as yet fully comprehend. As a result so far great abuses of the law have occurred up to and including the Mental Health Statutes. I am in the process of endeavouring to work my way back through these misapplications of the law to provide both sides of the story. I firmly believe that the truth will hold sway eventually since far too many people know what it is for it to be kept hidden.

I am faced, however, with those who would rush to an extreme resolution of this situation in hopes of hiding the truth and succeed with their illegal activity. As a result I am seeking legal assistance from several solicitors at the moment in this complex situation as there are several areas of law to be addressed with regard to the violations of my human rights by surveillance, harassment and mental health from which both criminal and civil tort remedies exist. Some law in these areas are new and provide excellent protection for victims such as myself. Where there have been such areas that the police have failed to adequately investigate or denied my providing information about, then I will file an appropriate complaint in due course.

First and foremost, though, is my paramount need to address through the courts the surveillance issue utilised by my civilian neighbours to bring that to an absolute halt so that I might go on with a private and confidential activity on behalf of myself in addressing all the issues concerned without further fear of the perversion of the course of justice which I have experienced in the past and which is occurring at this moment. If the police, Government and Home Secretary are helpless in addressing this key issue, then my only alternative is the High Court since I have and am suffering significant personal injury as a result.

Please accept my apologies for your being sent this second fax as it was an informative fax to the Prime [Minister] among others regarding a situation where I feel there have been significant abuses of legal powers from those in positions of responsibility who have allowed themselves to be bullied and badgered into illegal actions. As regards recent outright criminal activity, I have sent that to the police. These were instances of direct harassment on 9th December 1999 and 13th January 2000 and an indirect harassment on 18th December 1999. These were a death threat, threats of violence and general interference with my free access to the premises. The latter instance is one such letter dated 21st December 1999 which is now in your hands.

It is important to note that on 13th January 2000 I was stalked and yelled at as the "one who keeps calling the police." In this environment this is the cardinal sin: to report criminal activity to the police. This is why I am being harassed, and the police, ************** management, local Government and *********** *********** Authority are apparently supporting this harassment wittingly or unwittingly. I do not keep calling the police and have done so quite infrequently and only in serious instances when I have been so instructed by the Social Services who originally called the police with regard to the child abuse problem brought to their attention. I have called the police in an assault/rape incident which involved a close neighbour (I eventually learned) and a rage incident which involved those who were the child abusers (which I did not know at the time of calling the police). These were legitimate emergency calls which are now a part of the harassment retaliation among other issues of ********** management regarding health and safety.

I hope you understand that this is a situation worth fighting for to get it right so that the Government and all law enforcement agencies can function properly in these difficult situations in the future. The Home Secretary has said in the not to distant past words to the effect that people should "get involved". I heard an interview on Radio 4 [Today/PM] where he described an incident where he talked with some lads about throwing stones over the fence from a tube station I believe. He was not advocating "Have a go" activity but merely suggesting that people should act in a responsible way when they witness crime or anti-social conduct. I have done that as I always have in my life very carefully and appropriately. This time it has brought the most intense retaliation imaginable from those who have committed illegal, criminal and anti-social acts having reached such proportions that it is entirely justified with regard to being brought to the Prime Minister's attention.

For this same reason it should be brought to the Home Secretary's attention, and I request that you do that by means of this letter. There are key issues here which will be key issues of Government and Law in the 21st Century and must be addressed with all the ability and competence that is available.

Sincerely yours

/s/ Gary D Chance

PS Please note further that my character and history are spotless. I have never taken drugs nor had anything to do with anyone that did. I don't even drink coffee or tea, smoke and have had not alcohol for 3.75 years. I have never engaged in any criminal activity and certainly have had no dealings with anyone who has. I have worked closely with the police in other communities with regard to crime and have fought corruption when it became known to me. I have had no problems with the ********* ********** Police in the 5.5 years prior to my move to this location 3.75 years ago. In fact, my experience with them was just the opposite. I had the highest regard and respect for the job that they did as far as I saw it first hand in several instances. My problems with the ********** ********* Police began when moving to this location and were brought to the attention of the *********** ************* Police Commissioner as I thought appropriate at the times these problems occurred. I have an advanced graduate degree and have served in the military where I worked in Communications Intelligence having had a Top Secret Cryptographic security clearance. My feet are firmly on the ground as regards my observation of and knowledge about the surveillance which I have personally observed and described in my letter of 23rd September 1999 to the Prime Minister. There is no justification whatsoever for subjecting me to any official surveillance and invoking the Mental Health Act for reporting my experiences to the Prime Minister as that letter to him of 23rd September 1999 was in my Mental Health file when I visited a psychiatrist for the first time at the ******** ********** Hospital last week [13th January 2000] upon written request.

cc The Rt Honourable Tony Blair, Prime Minister By Fax *************

Fax/letter to the Prime Miniser at the end of the Millennium dated 29th December 1999 noting that the state of siege continued aganst me with its foundation in the abuse of power which was about to unfold even more devastatingly than I could image in the following two months.

This will apparently be my last fax to you regarding this matter if I am lucky enough to get it written and sent before my flat is taken over and I am taken away without any legal due process whatsoever which would enable me to present my documented evidence and testimony.

This is one of the greatest travesties of justice imaginable in a so-called civilised society that reflects only the most primitive of barbarism at the end of the 2nd Millennium on the brink of the 3rd. It shows corruption in local government, management and law enforcement which deny basic human rights and legal process. I have the documents and evidence to prove my position and allegations but am being denied that by those with the power to circumvent such civilised means.

That abuse of power is the key issue in this matter reflecting the many instances where local government and tenant *********** management has denied the expression and redress of just and well founded grievances. The bullying mentality has permeated this fundamentally dishonest atmosphere to the point of corrupting the local police as well.

All my efforts to bring to light the real truth of this situation as it has evolved over the past 3.5 years have failed. My efforts to report crime involving those who lived around me has seen retribution and vendetta take hold with apparent success in retaliation which is at hand. My efforts to redress management problems which threatened life and property were thwarted and denied by the tenant *********** management with the support of the local government.

Finally my efforts to bring child abuse to the attention of the authorities met with such a fragmentation of bureaucratic bungling that those who are the child abusers have been able to successfully retaliate through harassment bringing law enforcement into disgrace and disrepute despite my best efforts to get the truth in to the light of day.

On the 12th day of the continuing attempts to enter my flat by force using all the technology available to law enforcement they appear poised to succeed in just a few minutes. This will deny me the right to preserve and protect my life and my property and thus obliterate any ability I might have to bring this matter into the proper legal channels. This is a disgrace of the most profound character against a society that deems itself to be just and fair for it is neither.

Sincerely yours

/s/ Gary D Chance

A short fax/letter to the Prime Minister on 21st December 1999 noting that a state of siege had occurred following my letter to him of 23rd September 1999. I also explicitly note the existence of corruption and maladministraton.

7.

21 December 1999 The Rt Honourable Tony Blair Prime Minister

Dear Mr Prime Minister

On 23rd September 1999 I faxed you a 50-page letter dealing with some of the issues involving child abuse retaliation for bringing the matter to the attention of the authorities and illegal surveillance I have experienced since May 1998.

You forwarded that to the Home Office for reply although it covered several departments of Government. The Home Office reply was inadequate suggesting that I complain against the police.

For eight days from 11.12.99 thru 18.12.99 I was under a state of seige by the ********* *********** Police acting at the behest of those who were harassing me. The situation has taken an even more gruesome turn in the past two days as noted in the attached fax to the ******** ********* Police for their immediate action. I have sent ******** ********* ******** a copy too to make certain that it does not get "lost" at that Station.

I believe that this is a matter for your immediate attention in order to prevent the perversion of justice. I have direct evidence and extensive documentation concerning corruption and maladministration on the part of the *********** ************ ************ *************, the ************ *********** *************** and the ************* ************** *********** ************ ***********. This evidence and documentation is at risk as is my ability to legally and properly pursue this matter if my life is destroyed by the actions now underway by these various organisations.

There is no foundation whatsoever for this action as I have been trying to communicate without success for the better part of 18 months. What is occurring is nothing more than a lynch mob at work driven by *********** bullies whom I have reported to the authorities for child abuse. It is ********* management by tenants at its worst.

Your sincerely

Gary D Chance *********************** ***********************

Copyright 1996 - 2001 by Gary D Chance

All rights reserved

Permission to reproduce and distribute electronic copies free of charge is hereby granted provided that it is reproduced accurately and that the source and copyright status of the material is made evident to users, but a printed copy or copies or a copy or copies distributed for financial gain is forbidden.