“Don’t look at the screen behind me. It’s a secret.”

Listen to this. Since the so-called war on terror has started, “casualties have increased by 4,500 percent”![1] There is more:

“Between 2007 and 2011, almost half the world’s terror attacks took place in Iraq and Afghanistan—two countries under active occupation by the United States.”[2]

The big questions are simple: Who is causing all these casualties? Who are the real culprits? Muslims? Hezbollah? Assad? Iran? North Korea? Japan?

Well, according to the prevailing vision, the United States and its allies (Israel and Saudi Arabia) have virtually nothing to do with this. They are the good guys fighting terrorism and spreading democracy and freedom.

That thesis is a bold lie from start to finish and has lost its moral and political ground when evidence after evidence showed that Israel, the United States, Turkey, and ISIS have been going to the same night club and cocktail parties and exchanging ideologies for years.

But why aren’t other so-called alternative media deconstructing this lie and telling their viewers the whole truth? Why aren’t people like Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson seriously looking at those issues?

Why do those useful idiots continue to look at the Syrian refugee crisis as the real problem when those same useful idiots are not willing to examine the people who caused the so-called crisis in the first place?

Why aren’t Zionist whores like Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer looking at this situation objectively? Why is Spencer in particular playing into the hands of his oppressors?

“Geller and I are whoring for Zionism. Boy, that job pays well. Yahoo!”

Spencer, who styles himself a “leading scholar of Islam,”[3] is one of the most dishonest and weirdest Zionist writers I have ever encountered since I started doing research on these issues. His recent Zionist propaganda, The Complete Infidel’s Guide to ISIS, contains a torrent of factual errors that will probably fill Grand Canyon two miles deep. I can only address one here and provide a refutation of Spencer’s overarching perversion of history and truth.

Spencer begins his book by saying that that ISIS is “embarking upon a reign of terror unmatched in recent memory—rivaling the atrocities of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot.”[4]

First of all, I am really confused here. Haven’t we been told ad nauseam that the Holocaust was unique?

Many Jewish writers indirectly advocate this form of doctrine in one way or another. For thought-police Deborah Lipstadt, downplaying the “uniqueness” of the Holocaust is to be a Holocaust denier.[8]

German historian Ernst Nolte made the mistake of comparing the Holocaust to other crimes that have committed in history, such as Stalin’s extermination of the Russian people, the Armenian genocide, and Pol Pot’s crimes against humanity. For this, Lipstadt labeled him a Holocaust denier. Historian Joachim Fest defended Nolte on historical and rational grounds, and received the same treatment.[9]

So, should we call Robert Spencer a Holocaust denier? Where is Deborah Lipstadt when you need her?

Second, is Robert Spencer willing to trade whatever honesty he had for public ridicule? Is he willing to sell his intellectual soul by comparing Stalin’s war of extermination to ISIS’ terrorist crimes?

Obviously Spencer has chosen to dump the scholarly literature and has gone to the Zionist slaughter house. In other words, he has been committing historical and intellectual suicide because he has been programmed by essentially Talmudic categories, which is to say that he has to abandon the truth whenever it doesn’t fit his ideological weltanschauung.

A little bit of history here. By 1937, two years before World War II, Stalin had already starved and executed as many as ten million peasants.[10] This period in history—from 1929-1937—is known as the Red Holocaust.[11]

By 1938, a total of 9.7 million perished, and from 1939 until 1953, another 9 million lost their lives.[12] From 1937-1939, Stalin executed 50,000 clergymen alone.[13] Stalin’s terrorism began as early as 1918, when

“he ordered the execution of all suspected counter-revolutionaries. Stalin burned villages in the countryside to intimidate the peasants and discourage bandit raids on food supplies a decade before he became Red tsar.”[14]

Even after World War II, Stalin did not stop terrorizing the peasants.[15] Minority groups such as the Greeks, Germans, Turks, Orthodox Christians, Lithuanians, and Vlasovites also fell prey to Stalin’s ethnic cleansing.[16] Can those crimes be even remotely compared to what ISIS is doing in the Middle East?

Spencer, like other Zionist whores, can never bring himself to the fact that the Israeli regime, the United States, Turkey, and ISIS are one big family. Throughout his book, he cites the Independent and the Telegraph to buttress his point.

But will Spencer address articles by the Daily Mail and the International Business Times which independently link Israel to al-Qaeda and ISIS?[17] Will he address Seymour M. Hersh’s recent bombshell in the London Review of Books?[18] Will he discuss former C.I.A. officer Philip Giraldi’s claim that Israel and the United States are accomplices in spreading ISIS?[19]

Will Spencer be man enough to address the fact that the Syrian rebels have and perhaps still are being treated in Israeli hospitals?[20] Doesn’t he know that Israel supported the Syrian rebels from the beginning?[21] Doesn’t he know that there is basically no big different between the Syrian rebels and al-Qaeda or ISIS?[22]

Doesn’t Spencer know that the so-called Syrian rebels, as USA Today itself put it in 2013, “pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda”?[23] Doesn’t he know that “Hamas,” according to Avner Cohen (a Jewish scholar and Israeli official who has written prolifically on Israel’s nuclear bomb[24]), “is Israel’s creation”?[25] Doesn’t Spencer know that Israel has been a terrorist state from its inception?[26]

Readers should know that Spencer will never address those issues historically and objectively precisely because that would be the death knell of his essentially Talmudic pursuit. This is one reason why Jewish Neocon and thought-police David Horowitz, whose parents were members of the Communist Party USA during the Great Depression, has given Spencer great accolades. It was Horowitz who declared in his memoir that:

“For nearly two hundred years, Jews have played a disproportionate role as leaders of the modern revolutionary movements in Europe and the West…By carrying the revolution to its conclusion, socialists would usher in a millennium and fulfill the messianic prophecies of the pre-Enlightenment religions that modern ideas had discredited.

“Through this revolution, the lost unity of mankind would be restored, social harmony would be reestablished, paradise regained. It would be a tikkun olam, a repair of the world.”[27]

Horowitz ended up carrying this revolutionary banner during the Iraq war. He said of the invasion:

“[T]his is a war whose aims and purposes make it very hard to understand how anyone who is a supporter of human rights, or who believes in freedom, could be against it. In four years, George Bush has liberated nearly 50 million people in two Islamic countries.

“He has stopped the filling of mass graves and closed down the torture chambers of an oppressive regime. He has encouraged the Iraqis and the people of Afghanistan to begin a political process that give them rights they have not enjoyed in 5,000 years…”[28]

According to this premise, sending a six-trillion dollar bill to the American people is liberation.[29] Destroying virtually an entire country is a virtue.[30] Damaging the brains of at least 360,000 U.S. veterans is a great thing.[31] As former U.S. Colonel and noted historian Andrew Bacevich writes:

“Apart from a handful of deluded neoconservatives, no one believes that the United States accomplished its objectives in Iraq, unless the main objective was to commit mayhem, apply a tourniquet to staunch the bleeding, and then declare the patient stable while hastily leaving the scene of the crime.”[32]

“I was publicly critical of the university president’s paid trip to Israel…I am presently struggling to generate the funds to pay the costs of court-transcripts for the appeal that has been filed.”

Spencer cannot address those issues because Horowitz will kick him out of FrontPage Magazine and call him an anti-Semite. Horowitz’s FrontPage is a Jewish propaganda machine which perpetuates wars in the Middle East, demonizes Muslims, and distracts serious Christians and ultimately all Goyim.

One can safely say that Spencer, like Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson, have been paid to dance like puppets. They are all Pamela Geller turned upside down. The only difference is Geller is Jewish. In her endorsement to Spencer’s Complete Infidel’s Guide to ISIS, Geller writes,

“If sanity still prevailed in our government and media, this book would be required reading for all elected officials and journalists.”

Spencer obviously returns the favor. Geller, Spencer says,

“has shown me by example how to maintain a healthful perspective and joy in life amid constant vilification and ongoing threats of blood and death. If there is any justice and historical memory, free people of successive generations will celebrate and laud her as one of the unsung heroes of this generation, a foremost champion of freedom in this rapidly darkening age.”

What we are seeing here is that birds of the same feather flock together. As the Jewish Week itself has reported, Geller has already been recognized—but not for intellectual ability but for “frolicking in a bikini and posing in a skin-tight Superwoman outfit.”

I sympathize for decent people who have ignorantly plunked down the money to support those Zionist whores. Those whores are like medicine men delivering cheap products to their clients. It just doesn’t cost them much to put a sledge hammer on Muslims and lump them together as if they are the real perpetrators. But to scholarly and logically document the real villains who continue to inflict vengeance on much of the West will cost you much: your career and perhaps your life.

Norman Finkelstein lost his career when he challenged Alan Dershowitz. Finkelstein, to this very day, can never get a serious teaching position in the United States. Eminent climatologist and physicist Denis Rancourt, as we have already seen, lost his job at the University of Ottawa after teaching for twenty-five years!

Rancourt is not your typical scientist. He has published more than 100 articles in scientific journals and is now doing research on the causes of cancer. Yet that still was not enough for the powers that be. Rancourt recounted:

“I was publicly critical of the university president’s paid trip to Israel. I invited Palestinian speakers into my classrooms to talk about Gaza, and geopolitical analysts who were critical of Israel.

“These moves led to condemnation of me in the Zionist mainstream media, and to discipline, which was overturned. In 2008, a new university president – Allan Rock – who is a staunch and unconditional supporter of Israel and who had been Canada’s Zionist ambassador to the UN, became immediately motivated to fire me, tenure or not, and irrespective of my popular courses and my large science research funding.

“With the help of an entire team using specially-hired union-busting lawyers, after contriving for years including intensive covert surveillance of me using a hired-student spy to monitor my every spoken and written word and my every activity on campus and at other university campuses, the university finally settled on the false pretext for dismissal of alleging that I had improperly assigned high grades to all 23 students in an advanced physics course.

“They needed a ‘clean’ pretext that they hoped would be supported by public opinion and that would not bring out all of their dirt.

“When public opinion and some mainstream media sided with me instead, a high-profile Zionist columnist at the New York Times suddenly wrote not-one but two articles to discredit me, and was invited to Canada to falsely defame me, regarding my teaching, on a trend-setting Canadian TV talk show whose producers are Zionists.

“Even after I was fired, as I continued to be publicly critical of the institution, the university funded a large defamation lawsuit against me which, after almost four years, has entirely washed-out my personal savings, and over which I was ordered to pay a total of legal costs and damages in excess of one million dollars, that I can never pay.

“I am presently struggling to generate the funds to pay the costs of court-transcripts for the appeal that has been filed. My funding campaign is endorsed by the Ontario Civil Liberties Association, which also has a campaign that condemns the university’s unlimited funding of the lawsuit against me using public money.”

Alex Jones will never interview people like Rancourt. Jones in particular will say a few truthful things here and there, but when it comes to examining the deep issues and even the people who are sending the West into a hellish existence, he will back off or call them “The Left” or “Globalist” or something weird.

Jones and Watson keep talking about the “war on Christmas,” but they could never get off their comfortable chairs and do a little scholarly research to see the true visage of the people who are waging a war on Christmas.[33] Jewish scholar Joshua Eli Plaut explicitly writes in his study A Kosher Christmas: ‘Tis the Season to Be Jewish that

“Jonathan Sarna, a preeminent historian of American Jewry, argued that American Jews have a ‘Christmas problem.’”[34]

Plaut declares that American Jewry wants to “coop the Christmas season by reshaping it to reflect uniquely Jewish ideas, concerns, and practices and by developing a variety of strategies directed toward neutralizing Christmas in America.”[35] Plaut continues,

“Befitting their status as one of America’s most successful constituent groups, Jews have reshaped Christmas and challenged society to broaden the December season to recognize festivities sponsored by secular and minority groups.

“Writing in 1990, Jonathan Sarna argued that Christmas is one barrier that Jews cannot overcome in their quest to be regarded of equal status with their American neighbors who celebrate Christmas.”[36]

Plaut has seen the Jewish subversion of Christmas in his own life:

“In 1995, during my tenure as the rabbi of the Martha’s Vineyard Hebrew Center, a local public school advisory committee, which included residents of the Jewish faith, advised the local public schools board to eliminate the public celebration of Christmas in the Vineyard Haven public school.”[37]

This sentiment is echoed by another Jewish scholar by the name of Benjamin Ginsberg:

“Religious symbols and forms of expression that Jews find threatening have been almost completely eliminated from schools and other public institutions. Suits brought by the ACLU, an organization whose leadership and membership are predominantly Jewish, secured federal court decisions banning officially sanctioned prayers in the public schools and crèches and other religious displays in parks and public buildings.”[38]

Jewish columnist Burt Prelutsky wrote in 2005 that the war on Christmas is spearheaded by “my fellow Jews. When it comes to pushing the multicultural, anti-Christian agenda, you find Jewish judges, Jewish journalists, and the American Civil Liberties Union, at the forefront.”[39]

Even in Israel, Benzi Gopstein, The head of Lehava, tells us that “Christmas has no place in the Holy Land.”[40] For Gopstein, Christians are “blood-sucking vampires” who ought to be removed from Israel “before they once again drink our blood.”[41]

The Israel Movement for Reform and Progressive Judaism and the Coalition Against Racism declared that Gopstein’s statement “was not made in a vacuum but in the context of many acts of violence against Christian clergy in recent years.”[42] Jews have been spitting on Christians in Israel for more than a decade.[43] This has been the historical conflict during centuries![44]

Why can’t Alex Jones expose the real powers that be here? Well, obviously he loves his money and perhaps popularity. For Jones, it seems to be that the almighty dollar is more interested and sacrosanct than the whole truth. St. Paul tells us that “For the love of money is the root of all evil,” and Jones is a modern manifestation of that statement. Let us keep in mind that Jones’ net worth is $8 million.

Once again, let us suppose that this dumb idea is true. Does Jones mean to tell us that he doesn’t know that the Israeli regime has been working with ISIS since the war in Syria has started? Why is this shaman cunningly forging deliberate deceptions to seduce millions upon millions of viewers?

If you are an Alex Jones fan, be smart. Use your critical thinking skills. If you have been pouring money on his show business, think again. Psycho-analyze Jones thoroughly. He is certainly laughing all the way to the bank.

Jones wants your money, which is his “precious.” And to get that money, he will always mix a little bit of truth in a river of fabrication, strong enough to distract you from focusing on the main issue. What he usually does is that he would interview a prominent politician and journalist like Donald Trump and Seymour Hersh to get people’s attention.

If you are a Trump fan, then you more than likely will respond, “Well, Jones is doing great.” If you have read Hersh’s recent article, “Military to Military,” then you probably will say that Jones wants the complete truth.

False.

The fact is that what Jones is not telling you should be frightening. If you plan to continue to watch his puppet show, do more research and ask him deeper questions. If you plant to support him with your money, at least consider your family first. Viewers like you deserve to know the whole truth, and Jones is hiding it because that is how he gets his publicity stunt.

Jones’ supporters work too hard to pay the bills, to put food on the table, and to save a few dollars to support him and Watson and Spencer.

[27] Quoted in E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014), 966.

[28] David Horowitz, “Why We Were in Iraq,” FrontPage Magazine, March 21, 2013

[29] David Lazarus, “Iraq war cost: $6 trillion. What else could have been done?,” LA Times, March 18, 2013; “The $6 Trillion Wars,” The Nation, March 29, 2013; Iraq War Cost U.S. More Than $2 Trillion, Could Grow to $6 Trillion, Says Watson Institute Study,” Huffington Post, March 14, 2013.

[33] For further studies on these issues, see Stephen M. Feldman, Please Don’t Wish Me a Merry Christmas: A Critical History of the Separation of Church and State (New York and London: New York University Press, 1997); Joshua Eli Plaut, A Kosher Christmas: ‘Tis the Season to be Jewish (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2012).

[34] Joshua Eli Plaut, A Kosher Christmas: ‘Tis the Season to Be Jewish (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2012), 3-4.

[44] See Ruth Langer, Cursing the Christians?: A History of the Birkat HaMinim (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012); Rodney Stark, The Rise of Christianity: A Sociologist Reconsiders History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 50-51; Peter Schäfer, Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).

Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.