I'm a (moderate) democrat and I hate her with a blinding passion because her liberalness spews out of her mouth like a thick soup of chowder.

And her face resembles that of a witch mixed with a bitch.

I'm sure I agree with her policies, but a leader in the house is supposed to have charismatic and persuasive abilities. She comes off as combative, and anything she says makes the listener want to refute it just for the sake of not agreeing with her. It's not a good quality at all and is only contributing to the partisan atmosphere.

What is wrong with these progressive maggots. Did they not learn that the people of America want their country back. The people voted for change back towards the Constituion not for the forwarding of the NWO agenda adopted as the platform of the Demorats. Nancy is a major element of the traitorous left against We the People and these folks put her back as a leader. I am not sure the left can learn from experience. Instead she should have been arrested, jailed and tried for treason. Folks we have to get to that point somehow or their globalist agenda will continue. It is a shame that those that took aoths are as corrupt. This leaves us just one choice I am afraid.

People hate her because she is trying to shape America into a very specific brand of extreme San Francisco liberalism that is supported only by a very small minority of voters. And she goes about it in the most abrasive way possible. On top of being annoying she looks all dried up and ghoulish, like a warning poster against plastic surgery.

What is wrong with these progressive maggots. Did they not learn that the people of America want their country back. The people voted for change back towards the Constituion not for the forwarding of the NWO agenda adopted as the platform of the Demorats. Nancy is a major element of the traitorous left against We the People and these folks put her back as a leader. I am not sure the left can learn from experience. Instead she should have been arrested, jailed and tried for treason. Folks we have to get to that point somehow or their globalist agenda will continue. It is a shame that those that took aoths are as corrupt. This leaves us just one choice I am afraid.

unbiasedman hit the nail on the head. She's so unlikable because of her demeanor, affect, behavior, and (in my personal opinion) her shrieking oration. I hate Nancy Pelosi for those reasons in the same way I hate Sarah Palin for her stupidity and ignorance. I hate her as a person, not as a political factor.

And here we go again. More bitter partisanship like the last four years.

Click to expand...

I don't understand this sentiment at all. You're saying that politicians who are elected for their ideology should do away with their ideology when it comes to creating policy? It doesn't make any sense. This whole "bipartisanship" nonsense is destroying our country. Ultimately, it leads to industries creating policy and paying both sides to sign off on it. **** that.

And here we go again. More bitter partisanship like the last four years.

Click to expand...

I don't understand this sentiment at all. You're saying that politicians who are elected for their ideology should do away with their ideology when it comes to creating policy? It doesn't make any sense. This whole "bipartisanship" nonsense is destroying our country. Ultimately, it leads to industries creating policy and paying both sides to sign off on it. **** that.

unbiasedman hit the nail on the head. She's so unlikable because of her demeanor, affect, behavior, and (in my personal opinion) her shrieking oration. I hate Nancy Pelosi for those reasons in the same way I hate Sarah Palin for her stupidity and ignorance.

Click to expand...

Theres a difference for someone being unlikable for what you said about Pelosi and someone being stupid and ignorant like Palin. One is deserving, the other is more superficial.

unbiasedman hit the nail on the head. She's so unlikable because of her demeanor, affect, behavior, and (in my personal opinion) her shrieking oration. I hate Nancy Pelosi for those reasons in the same way I hate Sarah Palin for her stupidity and ignorance.

Click to expand...

Theres a difference for someone being unlikable for what you said about Pelosi and someone being stupid and ignorant like Palin. One is deserving, the other is more superficial.

Click to expand...

Partially, but not completely, especially when (as UBM mentioned) one of the key aspects to being a leader of your party is charisma and non-abrasiveness.

And here we go again. More bitter partisanship like the last four years.

Click to expand...

I don't understand this sentiment at all. You're saying that politicians who are elected for their ideology should do away with their ideology when it comes to creating policy? It doesn't make any sense. This whole "bipartisanship" nonsense is destroying our country. Ultimately, it leads to industries creating policy and paying both sides to sign off on it. **** that.

Click to expand...

So you have no concept of compromise?

Click to expand...

I would if both parties were coming to the table in good faith. As it is, neither are. Democrats are the Republicans of 30 years ago and Republicans are in the crazy house.

I don't get this criticism at all. Several republicans were telling outright lies about what was in the healthcare bill (death panels, anyone?). It was a response to that. Additionally, it was a very long bill. Several people couldn't be bothered to read the bullet points that were outlined everywhere during the debate. Most people still don't even realize what is in the bill.

Do you? If you could give me a rundown of specifics, I would appreciate it.

I'm a (moderate) democrat and I hate her with a blinding passion because her liberalness spews out of her mouth like a thick soup of chowder.

And her face resembles that of a witch mixed with a bitch.

I'm sure I agree with her policies, but a leader in the house is supposed to have charismatic and persuasive abilities. She comes off as combative, and anything she says makes the listener want to refute it just for the sake of not agreeing with her. It's not a good quality at all and is only contributing to the partisan atmosphere.

People hate her because she is trying to shape America into a very specific brand of extreme San Francisco liberalism that is supported only by a very small minority of voters. And she goes about it in the most abrasive way possible. On top of being annoying she looks all dried up and ghoulish, like a warning poster against plastic surgery.

I'm a (moderate) democrat and I hate her with a blinding passion because her liberalness spews out of her mouth like a thick soup of chowder.

And her face resembles that of a witch mixed with a bitch.

I'm sure I agree with her policies, but a leader in the house is supposed to have charismatic and persuasive abilities. She comes off as combative, and anything she says makes the listener want to refute it just for the sake of not agreeing with her. It's not a good quality at all and is only contributing to the partisan atmosphere.

Click to expand...

this is why contemporary politics is fail. Image and public representation are apparently more important than policy.

I don't get this criticism at all. Several republicans were telling outright lies about what was in the healthcare bill (death panels, anyone?). It was a response to that. Additionally, it was a very long bill. Several people couldn't be bothered to read the bullet points that were outlined everywhere during the debate. Most people still don't even realize what is in the bill.

Do you? If you could give me a rundown of specifics, I would appreciate it.

Click to expand...

What a moronic response. Why the Hell would anyone pass a bill that they haven't read and don't know what is in it? Basically all of your arguments, its a long bill and people couldn't be bothered to read it, are exactly what is wrong with the bill in the first place and evidence that it should not have been passed, and any politician that supports passing it without reading it should be thrown out with yesterday's dishwater.

I don't get this criticism at all. Several republicans were telling outright lies about what was in the healthcare bill (death panels, anyone?). It was a response to that. Additionally, it was a very long bill. Several people couldn't be bothered to read the bullet points that were outlined everywhere during the debate. Most people still don't even realize what is in the bill.

Do you? If you could give me a rundown of specifics, I would appreciate it.

Click to expand...

Don't you at least disagree with the passing of a bill where the majority of the people voting on it haven't read it?

Regardless of whatever content is in the bill (or any bill), I'm not in favor of allowing a congressman to vote on a bill that he hasn't read. Ever.

Partially, but not completely, especially when (as UBM mentioned) one of the key aspects to being a leader of your party is charisma and non-abrasiveness.

Click to expand...

knowledge with little to no charisma >>>>>>> little to no knowledge with charisma

Click to expand...

When did I ever say they were the same?

Click to expand...

Because you said you dislike Palin for those reasons and people dislike Pelosi for the other reasons you posted. My point is that people have valid reasons to dislike Palin, but someone that lacks charisma is not deserving of being dismissed without looking someone taking a deeper look at the persons policies.

Im not necessarily saying that you dont agree with me in that respect, just noting that people are dumb if they actually dismiss her for the reasons you listed.

I don't get this criticism at all. Several republicans were telling outright lies about what was in the healthcare bill (death panels, anyone?). It was a response to that. Additionally, it was a very long bill. Several people couldn't be bothered to read the bullet points that were outlined everywhere during the debate. Most people still don't even realize what is in the bill.

Do you? If you could give me a rundown of specifics, I would appreciate it.

Click to expand...

What a moronic response. Why the Hell would anyone pass a bill that they haven't read and don't know what is in it? Basically all of your arguments, its a long bill and people couldn't be bothered to read it, are exactly what is wrong with the bill in the first place and evidence that it should not have been passed, and any politician that supports passing it without reading it should be thrown out with yesterday's dishwater.

Click to expand...

I am not saying that she didn't read the bill. I'm saying that the majority of people in the US didn't read the bill and thought a lot of crazy **** was in the bill when it wasn't. That's clearly what she meant by that comment.

The quote is: "We need to pass the bill so YOU can see what's in it." She is not including herself in that second pronoun. Obviously.