Subscribe to this blog

Follow by Email

If Tiger Woods Destroys the Tournament All Time Win Record Will He Be the Greatest Golfer?

Tiger Woods is winning for the 5th time this year, winning the Bridgestone Invitational by a gazillion (7) shots. So, he has 79 wins and the all time leader is Sam Snead with 82 wins.

While there is some argument that all of Snead's tournaments weren't properly counted, Tiger is 37 years old and could play the regular tour for another 13 to 18 years! He is fit and he could obliterate the record.

My question to readers is, if he wins 105-115 tournaments and yet doesn't get 19 majors, would that qualify him to be the greatest player ever? I say it would.

We could have Jack Nicklaus with 73 tournament wins and 18 majors and Tiger Woods with 105 tournament wins and 17 majors. While Tiger will probably pass Jack, it is not guaranteed. He has had the jitters playing majors the closer he gets to the record. Jack was not chasing anyone who had accumulated over 11 majors, Walter Hagen!

So with 17 majors and a record that will never be broken, say at 105 wins, will he be the all time best?

What do you think?

Get link

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Google+

Email

Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Join Talkmarkets for Financial Information. It is free! https://goo.gl/QZff5YI have written a lot of vetted articles that are exclusive** to Talkmarkets. Sorting a portion of them by subject will give the reader an opportunity to make sense of it all. I am adding a glossary of terms at the bottom of this page.For readers interested in economic subjects of the day, these top 30 themes are my efforts to make understanding economics easier:I have pinned the following article to the top because it is an insight into my personal life, as well as a commentary on isms. Capitalism is still the greatest system for creating wealth. However, it is often mixed, and mixturism is a factor in its success or failure:

There is further study in the articles I have cited for you at the end of this article. People must, must understand that Donald Trump is a divider of races and ethnicity, because at heart he is a fascist. Fascism seeks the purity of the races. Fascism is the opposite of what America stands for. Keep in mind that Donald Trump is highly influenced by Anarcho Capitalist, Murray Rothbard. This is an email I sent to an author online. It is slightly muddled, but overall quite accurate in its assessment of Libertarian Murray Rothbard:

Hi Steve,
I agree with your article on Rothbard, mostly. However, as a British court ruled, Zionism is not the essence of what it means to be Jewish. Therefore, I hate antiSemitism, and embrace antiZionism. I have both religious and non religious reasons for taking this stand. And the court absolves me of racism. After all my natural father was Jewish. And more and more Jews hate Zionism. And Zionism is quite multiracial at this point.
So, Trump actually is …

John Mauldin published an article regarding the economics of Donald Trump. I share many of his views. I think the article deserves to be discussed further.

It isn't as if John Mauldin is happy with the continual drive toward negative yields and the new normal. I believe he is like many, willing to fight for higher interest rates within reason and within the economic boundaries that exist. He is on board with the Fed, unlike other central banks, and is willing to risk recession to avoid negative rates:

Meanwhile, the Fed is in the middle of a long-overdue policy turn. There’s still a risk that they will find they started tightening just in time for a recession, which is also long overdue. I was convinced last summer that they would push rates negative in that scenario. Negative rates could yet happen, but I think they wi…