Gentrification Is Masqueraded as Revitalization

Gentrification is Masqueraded as Revitalization According to The Oxford English Dictionary, gentrification is defined as the renovation and improvement of a house or district so that it conforms to middle-class taste (Oxford English Dictionary). This definition absolutely fits the description of the current transformation of the inner City of Baltimore. When we look at neighborhoods such as Westport, Federal Hill, and Canton, it is evident that gentrification is on the City of Baltimore’s agenda. During the last two terms that Mayor Martin O’Mally has presided over the city, there have been many changes in administration and the population that are causing devastating effects on the city’s blue collar residents. The Baltimore City Department of Planning=s mission statement contends that its purpose is to provide the highest level of services and leadership in urban strategic planning, historical and architectural preservation, zoning and design, development and capitol budgeting to promote the sustained economic, social and community development of the City of Baltimore. Baltimore City=s planning commissioners adamantly declares Baltimore’s commitment to the revitalization of its most blighted neighborhoods, but at what cost? (www.ci.baltimore.md.us/government/planning/divisions.html#director). Through their strategic presentation, the Planning Departments implementation of these plans at first seems to address the needs of the city’s diverse population, but in most cases this is not the department’s true intention. What the departments mission statement does not contend but surely prescribes is, the intentional removal and displacement of the City of Baltimore=s lower class communities without any regard to how the City’s residents will be able to afford to live in their newly revitalized homes. There is much attention paid to detail when the city of Baltimore announces its newest plan for development and revitalization of a particular community. When Baltimore city developers plan the revitalization of urban developments, gentrification plays a most important role in the planning phase. Molly Rath writes: Couched in those terms, the notion of redirecting money from tattered communities to healthier ones suddenly seems less than egalitarian–sort of the neighborhood-revitalization equivalant of corporate welfare, the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. Then there’s the whole other race factor: Is concern over “income levels” and “demographic change” just gloss for an underlying assumption—that neighborhoods go south when white people move out and black people move in. If that isn’t enough to roil the revitalization waters, this emerging shift in neighborhood policy rings all kinds of alarm bells about gentrification and social engineering. Baltimore has avoided such prickly issues for the last decade with a community development approach under former Mayor Kurt Schmoke that favored the most decayed sectors in the city. Now, as Mayor Martin O’Malley’s administration begins formulating a new approach that gives greater consideration to neighborhoods that haven’t yet deteriorated those tricky issues threaten to surface. That has raised fears in some quarters of a polemical battle. But a surprising number of community leaders and activist—including some in the most blighted neighborhoods—recognize it’s a long-overdue change in direction, and they point to 12 years of stasis to make their point (“Turf Wars”). Revitalization in Baltimore city means that, in most cases many of its historically poor neighborhoods have or will be transformed into fast paced high income ranking communities (“Turf Wars”). Dozens of decaying drug infested communities remain unaltered, only communities like Canton and Federal Hill that have the potential to draw the attention of the upper class sector of citizens are even mentioned in the plans for revitalization (“Turf Wars”). Most of the remaining lower class citizens...

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

...D. Morris
Gentrification
Dr. W. Holmes
Poli 304 Seminar in Urban Problems
Gentrification or Economic Development
Historic preservation has traditionally been simply restoring historically significant architectural or geographical sites for aesthetic value or for the benefit of future generations to better understand the ways and styles of the past. As the National Trust for Historic Preservation explains, “when historic buildings and neighborhoods are torn down or allowed to deteriorate, a part of our past disappears forever. When that happens, we lose history that helps us know who we are, and we lose opportunities to live and work in the kinds of interesting and attractive surroundings that older buildings can provide” (NTHP web site).
Recently the use of historic preservation has also begun to be viewed by cities and towns as a means to economic development and urban renewal. According to advocates, historic preservation has aided in local economic and community revitalization, increased tourism and employment, and preserved regional history, culture, and pride. However, historic preservation has often lacked public support due to a negative reputation. Some see it, not as a means to revitalizing local communities, but rather, as simply driving the problems further under the surface or into other areas, namely, as a means to gentrification. This reputation is not entirely unfounded, as there have been...

...﻿Analyzing Gentrification Through the Lenses
Analyzing Gentrification Through the Lenses
Professor of Urban Affairs and Planning at Hunter College, Peter Kwong once said, “Living in this gentrification environment is much more difficult for residents. Actually, what they’re doing is killing the indigenous culture.” This process of gentrification that Kwong is referring to is defined as the purchasing and renovating of low-priced properties, usually by higher income individuals, in often deteriorated urban neighborhoods. The result is an influx of wealthier residents, and in effect, higher property prices. Gentrification applies to many different aspects of society, especially in urban communities. It is important to analyze the complex process of gentrification through several different lenses. For example, the effect of art and artists on how popular a neighborhood gets. Another significant perspective to consider is the social and cultural aspect. There are two different viewpoints on the effects of gentrification. On one end, the gentrifiers do not realize that they are causing racial tensions within the community, yet on the other end, older residents of gentrifying neighborhoods are objecting to this injustice. Moreover, gentrification also impacts the economics of a neighborhood. These impacts include both the positive and negative situations for their...

...GentrificationGentrification is the rehabilitation/renewal of a deteriorated neighbourhood by new residents who are wealthier than the long-time residents. This can cause an increase in house prices and lead to the displacement of the long-time residents. It is often small scale and incremental, usually instigated by individual people and is often accompanied by landscape and street furniture improvements. An example of Gentrification is that of Notting Hill. Although the place is now a bustling urban area, in the mid-eighteenth century a country hamlet that was known for it's gravel pits and roadside inns had proved to be a magnet in attracting highwaymen. The unpopular tollgate, which gave the main road it's name appeared during this time. The Industrialisation brought many workers in from the countryside (urbanisation), with the landlords building tiny terreced houses to rent to the poor. During the Victorian Times Notting Hill was a rough, working class area and by the 1950's the area had become synonymous with slum landlords and inner-city deprivation. In 1958, it was the scene of many race riots after the tensions arose between the newly arrived afro-caribbean community and the teddy boys of the facist British Unioon, a secound riot then took place during the infamous Notting Hill Carnival in 1976.
The past 30 years have seen a steady northwards swarm of gentrification, with estate agents coining names like...

...Abstract
In most cities the downtown area is usually referred to as the heart of the city. And in Los Angeles the downtown area can be described as such. But just like a human being with a serious case of a Cardiovascular disease is the same fate of Downtown Los Angeles. Here in this case, instead of cholesterol clogging up the arteries and veins, we have homeless people and rundown building clogging up the streets of Downtown Los Angeles. However, just like a heart patient that requires an open heart surgery, so is Downtown Los Angeles whose version of this is called the “Revitalization of Downtown Los Angeles”.
Our Downtown
To all of us Downtown Los Angeles serves a different purpose and signifies a different mean. Downtown Los Angeles can be described as the converging point for everything in the great county of Los Angeles and neighbor counties. The place where affluence meets poverty, where Business romances with Pleasure, and the point where education cross-sects with fashion, need I say more about this intriguing place called Downtown Los Angeles.
Downtown Los Angeles is the central business district in Los Angeles, and is interesting located relatively in the center of Los Angeles. It plays host to most of the major arts institutions and Sports arenas and facilities, sightseeing opportunities, numerous skyscrapers and various multinational corporations and a plethora of public art and different shopping opportunities. The converging...

...Language revitalization, language revival or reversing language shift is the attempt by interested parties, including individuals, cultural or community groups, governments, or political authorities, to reverse the decline of a language. If the decline is severe, the language may be endangered, moribund, or extinct. In these cases, the goal of language revitalization is often to recover the spoken use of the language. Although the goals of language revitalization vary by community and situation, a goal of many communities is to return a language that is extinct or endangered to daily use. The process of language revitalization is the reverse of language death.
-------------------------------------------------
Theory
Reversing language shift has been an area of study among sociolinguists, including Joshua Fishman, in recent decades. Reversing language shift involves establishing the degree to which a particular language has been 'dislocated' in order to determine the best way to assist or revive the language.
Revival linguistics
Ghil'ad Zuckermann proposes Revival Linguistics as a new linguistic discipline and paradigm. "Zuckermann's term 'Revival Linguistics' is modelled upon 'Contact Linguistics' (&lt;language contact). Revival linguistics inter alia explores the universal constraints and mechanisms involved in language reclamation, renewal and revitalization. It draws perspicacious comparative...

...Invaders?
Gentrification is affecting the African American community in Harlem negatively because it is slowly wiping out black owned businesses. A lot believe it negatively changes the culture of neighborhoods. People might argue that it creates more jobs and brings in a more educated and wealthier population to the area being gentrified, which can improve the community in the long run. Gentrification is the enemy of the poor, and does little to aid those who are forced to move out. Those who support it are only interested in profits rather than improving communities. Gentrification forces middle and low-income residents out of Harlem, ruins their small businesses and changes life.
Harlem’s culture and population was mostly influenced by the Great Migration. The Great Migration was a massive movement of African Americans who migrated north in search of a better life. In the article The African American Great Migration reconsidered, Sarah Jane Mathaieu states that African Americans migrated north “as a politicized response to their region's social, economic, and political climate. Simultaneously domestic and international migrants, African Americans used relocation as a measure of their freedom, as an exercise of their civil rights” (19). African Americans wanted to escape racism and avoid being lynched in the south, the bee weevil attacked cotton crops so there was a large decline in agricultural work....

...Conner Kolter
Hualapai Language Revitalization and Literacy
The Hualapai Indians, like many other indigenous societies, have faced the continuing threat of losing their culture. For this particular society, through perseverance, hard work and a helping hand from many people outside the Native American community, the Hualapai’s have been able to provide a writing system for their endangered language. This step has proven to be crucial in keeping the language and has also become an example for other Native American tribes who worry about their mother language becoming extinct. This success story has become a symbol that not all is lost if effort is put into something that is deeply cared about.
A culture and society’s language is one of, if not the most, important aspects to what makes them different from everyone else. Without that attribute, the people that belong to that language can feel lost and lose a sense of who they are. In the Hualapai culture, members who were in school in the 1930’s were forced to attend an English-only speaking school where the Hualapai language would be physically beaten out of them. Those children, who are now the grandparents of the present children of the small tribe, stress the importance of learning their native language considering how large a presence English has around them. With the new writing system, the members of the Hualapai tribe can keep their language and have it passed down from generation to generation....