Creationist bloggers can be infuriating. If one has infuriated you by persisting in nonsense even when corrected, or refusing to reply to your criiticsm, you may feel driven to recording the fact. If so, you may register your disapproval here and hope a response is forthcoming.

You responded in order to say you weren't going to respond ... your usual nonsensical approach, then.

But thank you for confirming by how you are behaving that, as I suspected on 4 March, your question of 3 March was not a genuine one but one that was loaded with propaganda which you now refuse for that reason to clarify - while falsely calling me 'ignorant' for not being able to make head or tail of your wording even though I did attempt an answer which you are now ignoring (the approach you always take to facts you do not like).

You are a classic closed-minded troll who refuses to learn from anyone who does not share your blinked view of the world.

again ahr uses his own definitions for the words bigot, liar, fraud and so on. I would suggest he return to primary school and relearn the lessons that taught what the definitions of those words actually are.

archaeologist55 wrote:again ahr uses his own definitions for the words bigot, liar, fraud and so on. I would suggest he return to primary school and relearn the lessons that taught what the definitions of those words actually are.

Further bigoted, lying, fraudulent comments from 'David'.

Would you like me to provide some dictionary definitions? I'd wager that they would describe behaviour that you exhibit. Refusal to accept reality you don't like. Setting yourself up as cleverer than everyone else. Mouthing false accusations. Twisting other peoples' words.