Sunday, February 15, 2009

From an interview with Adam Gorightly, who wrote a book on Manson (he's got the assassination attempt order mixed up):

". . . during Manson's childhood in West Virginia, his mother was a prostitute, and Charlie's mom was a friend of another prostitute who just so happened to be the mother of Sara Jane Moore, who later attempted to assassinate President Gerald Ford. In fact, Charlie and Sara Jane Moore were childhood friends. Later Manson Family member Squeaky Fromme attempted to assassinate Ford, as well. These were just many of the strange coincidences, synchronicities, or, dare I say it, conspiracies that I happened upon during the course of my research."

From an account of Moore's parole (it's funny how the conspiracies all link):

"Her attempt on Ford's life came less than three weeks after Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme, a devotee of Charles Manson, mastermind of the 1969 Tate-LaBianca murders in Los Angeles, also tried to kill Ford, pulling out a handgun but failing to get off a shot when he made an appearance in Sacramento."

and:

"On Feb. 4, 1974, a group of revolutionaries called the Symbionese Liberation Army kidnapped newspaper heiress Patricia Hearst, who morphed into a machine-gun-wielding terrorist and joined her captors for more than 19 months on the run. (The Hearst Corp. now owns The Chronicle.)

When the SLA demanded that Hearst's father, Randolph Hearst, feed poor people, a $2 million food giveaway program called "People In Need" was created.

Moore, an accountant who was already steeped in the Bay Area's radical politics, volunteered to be the group's bookkeeper. At the time, she was also an FBI informant, but apparently never rose far in the bureau's arsenal of snitches. That was in early 1974.

On Sept. 5, 1975, Fromme made the first assassination attempt on Ford. Thirteen days later, Hearst and the remaining SLA members were captured in San Francisco. Four days later, Moore tried to shoot Ford."

"While at PIN, she had struck up a friendship with Wilbert ("Popeye") Jackson, the black ex-convict who had formed the United Prisoners Union, dedicated to advancing prison reform. (He was gunned down in San Francisco on June 8 by unknown assassins.) Popeye, hinting at contacts with the S.L.A., approached Randolph Hearst with an offer to intercede for Patty's release. Sensing an opportunity, Moore managed to become the go-between in the dealings. It was a role that caught the attention of FBI agents, who thought she might provide useful information. According to her account (see box), the FBI hired her in the spring of 1974 and gave her a code name and control officer.

Sara Jane hung around the U.P.U. offices, answering phones and trying to ingratiate herself. But Popeye's blatant sexual activities offended her sensibilities. She also grew weary of being conned for money by him and got angry when he damaged her auto. She decided he was not sincere about trying to help free Patty. Her verdict: "He did what he wanted to, and to hell with the rest of the world."

The FBI assigned Moore a new target: a still unidentified radical leader whom she called Tom.

Soon, under Tom's tutelage, she found herself increasingly attracted to Maoist and Marxist ideas. She attended movies, discussions and seminars, often dragging along her son. Finally, she asked to join Tom's study group, and as an earnest of her sincerity, told Tom about her role as an FBI informant. Tom replied that while he believed her conversion, he would have to take the matter up with his colleagues. She recollected: "I was afraid of Tom's group, and I was afraid of the bureau if they found out I told Tom."

Word of Moore's FBI connection spread through the radical community, and she was ostracized. Whenever she attended meetings, she was surrounded by a circle of empty seats. She sought to counteract her alienation by making a full confession of her past links to the FBI. To reporters, radio interviewers and anyone else who would listen, she would pour forth self-criticism and expound on Marxist and Maoist theories. Whereupon both the FBI and the radicals dropped her entirely. Still longing for the thrills of clandestine work, she cultivated ties with San Francisco police, who in turn put her in touch with the Treasury Department's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms."

You need to know that there are some die-hard Zionists out there who pollute blogs, in the hopes that people will either get sick of the BS and leave or someone complains to the blog owner about the content and the blog gets banished to Never-Never Land.

One of the main Zionist Internet blog stalking sites is the Jewish Internet Defense Forces:

Leading the Fight against Antisemitism and Terrorism on the Web. Coordinating Concerned Citizens Globally. Promoting Jewish Pride, Knowledge.

Racial Jewishness is a useless concept (except to racist Jews, who use blutsanteil as a criterion to award stolen Arab land). The most racially Jewish person can read and think and decide to oppose evil. People who try to spread useless and hateful paradigms are prolly Jews trying to character-assassinate bloggers. It is an old trick of theirs to comment on a blog, then blame the blog for the comments they left there.

You got to admire him:http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24955339-5013404,00.htmlFredrich Toben will be visitig Germany soon and daring the Mannheim prosecutor who tried to have him extradited from Britain to go ahead so they could 'thrash it out in open court'. Wow. A battle of ideas. Respect.

I note that no one here has commented on Mark Weber's Jan. 07, 2009 article "How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism?" http://www.ihr.org/weber_revisionism_jan09.html"Suppose The New York Times were to report tomorrow that Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust center and the US Holocaust Memorial Museum had announced that no more than one million Jews died during World War II, and that no Jews were killed in gas chambers at Auschwitz. The impact on Jewish-Zionist power would surely be minimal""Jewish-Zionist power is a palpable reality with harmful consequences for America, the Middle East, and the entire global community. In my view, and as I have repeatedly emphasized, the task of exposing and countering this power is a crucially important one.7 In that effort, Holocaust revisionism cannot play a central role.""Setting straight the historical record about the wartime fate of Europe’s Jews is a worthy endeavor. But there should be no illusions about its social-political relevance. In the real world struggle against Jewish-Zionist power, Holocaust revisionism has proved to be as much a hindrance as a help."

Both Zundel and Irving are false opposition. So, it is certainly possible, likely, even.

David Irving and Ernst Zundel are both (covert) Jews.

As you may know, Zündel, Sundel, Zendel, Zengel, Stundel, Sindell etc are all Polish Jew names. Zündel was a publisher, a profession that the Jews have a strangle-hold on. Zündel's cause is pimped by well known operatives of the Jew false opposition.

Zundel, never bothered to complain about being tried for the content of a book, "Did Six Million Really Die?," that he never wrote.

Publishers are not held responsible for what others write.

If he wanted to escape the charge, he could have. However, he didn't want to escape the charge.

Irving is a Jew name. But more importantly, Irving's actions (like going to Austria to get arrested when he had no real reason to go) and the articles on his web site are clear evidence that the dude is Jew false opposition.

Irving was probably paid a reasonable sum for the months he spent in prison.

In his standard style, Mark Weber pretends that he has contributed greatly to the advance of Revisionism. And what proof does he adduce? Why, events of the 1980s! Mark Weber dredges up his testimony at the Zundel Trial in Canada as proof of his contributions to Revisionism. Leaving aside the fact that the testimonies of Faurrison, Leuchter and Irving were far more convincing than his own testimony, what has Mr. Weber done since taking over at the IHR to promote Revisionism? In a word, nothing. All the real research and writing that made the IHR world famous was achieved before Mark Weber came on board. Since then, Mark Weber has offered nothing but reprints from now deceased authors. Mark has made the IHR Journal both obsolete and defunct. He now screams that Revisionism is becoming politicized. (How shocking.) Professor Faurrison, who has done the original research which Mark Weber never did, is using the Holocaust Hoax to attack Israels brutalization of the Palestinians. What is wrong with that, pray tell?

Mr. Weber emphasizes that Bradley Smith's anti-Holocaust activities arent going so well, either. At least Bradley tries. That is more than Mark Weber is doing. Mark Webers excuses become ever more lame. The hard fact is that Mark is a do nothing. He has neither business nor management sense. He has failed as an editor, failed as a publisher and failed as a historian. He has no more excuses to offer. He should be relieved without further ado.

MFA, re mark weber comment above. revisionism or truth telling cant hurt. at what point do we ignore truth or the search for truth and where it will lead. holocaust revisionism/truth is a danger. why else so many museums, tours, movies, books, articles. would appear that weber is not to be trusted.

from bill guru (whoever he is):

"...Perhaps the best test of the true teachings of the Talmud is to compare the infamous passages with what the Jews do in the real world. If the Talmud really teaches that non-Jews are animals in human form, fit only to be enslaved or murdered by Godâ„¢s Chosen People, then one would expect these precepts to be implemented in the real world. Let us take the invasion of Gaza as an example. The world is horrified at what is going on. The Israelis are murdering helpless civilians by the most barbaric of methods. They treat the Palestinians as animals in human form -and slaughter them. Is this not exactly what the disputed Talmudic passages say? To go back further in history we may recall the tens of millions slaughtered by the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia by similarly gruesome methods. For those who recall the activities of the Jews in Roman times there were the horrible upheavals in which tens of thousands of Greek and Roman civilians were slaughtered by the Jewish rebels who then wrapped themselves in the intestines of their victims. Or there was the horrible massacre of 90,000 Christians delivered to the Jews for slaughter by the Persian King Cyrus after he retook Jerusalem from the Byzantines around 630 A.D. The details and the cover up in Jewish historiography are detailed in Mr. Horowitzâ„¢s book Reckless Rites . Thus, there is a barbarity in Jewish behaviour from ancient times to present that is entirely consistent with the literal word of the obnoxious Talmudic scriptures."

5ds, I replied to you on the 'Thursday' thread. Of course 'holocaust' research is important, but it's only being circulated samidszat style and hasn't over 60 years reached mainstream consciousness.It already is clear how Jews see the rest of humanity, but that is because of Lebanon, Gaza, and Palestine, not Mark Weber.But keep posting here, I always read your comments.