Awareness of financial issues, especially on the personal front is minimal even among highly educated professionals, including quite a few "Finance Professionals". This blog is intended to be of some value addition to anyone who cares about his/her personal finance. The focus will be on the Indian situation, though the principles will be applicable the world over..... (Please read the disclaimer at the bottom of this page without fail)

Friday 18 September 2009

I recently received the excerpts from the book "Sway" given at the bottom of this page through email. I remember having seen it some time back on the web. Can't recall the source.

However, the stuff is quite interesting in the realm of behavioural finance.

After reading it, we must understand the following:

Money earned from Salary, Received as a gift, Won in a lottery, Obtained by providing services, Got from capital gains by selling shares - All of it is of the same value in monetary terms. For instance, just because it is money from "hard-earned" salary, it should not be preserved more carefully. Likewise, just because it is earned from an "easy" source like a gift or in a lottery must not be frittered away.

When your portfolio value (or the share price of one of your holdings) increases - for any reason whatsoever, you must ensure that you make all efforts to "preserve" the profits and should not treat a reduction in value as being acceptable merely because it is still higher than your original purchase price

In a similar vein, when your portfolio value (or the share price of one of your holdings) decreases - for any reason whatsoever, you must ensure that you do not allow your emotions to either

"wait till it regains its original value to get out" and keep increasing your de-facto losses (because you know that some of those scrips will never get back to their original prices) - You must just get the hell out by cutting your losses and move on to better securities

"Get the hell out of the scrip as soon as it comes back to your purchase price or thereabouts" (Despite knowing that it is indeed a blue chip and you've already borne the pain of the temporary downturn and you're perhaps likely to reap the rewards of your patience because the business cycle has turned positive)

And you must know the difference between the above two categories - After all, you need to know the difference between your "core portfolio" - the "hold for the long term scrips" and the "trading scrips - use the momentum, flavour of the season and get in and get out quickly categories"

Regards,

N

Commitment & Loss Aversion

In a great book "Sway", the authors, Ori Brafman and Rom Brafman, write on commitment and loss aversion.

"We've all experienced the pervasive pull of commitment in some form or another; whether we've invested our time and money in a particular project or poured our energy into a doomed relationship, it's difficult to let go even when things clearly aren't working. As difficult as it can be to ad­mit defeat, however, staying the course simply because of a past commitment hurts us in the long run.

Independently, each of these two forces-commitment and aversion to loss-has a powerful effect on us. But when the two forces combine, it becomes that much harder to break free and do something different.

It's precisely because of the compounding effect of these two forces that students in Max Bazerman's negotiations class at Harvard Business School would do well to hold on to their wallets when he introduces his "twenty-dollar auc­tion." They say it's easy to take candy from a baby; Professor Bazerman has found that it's just as easy to take money from Harvard MBAs.

On the first day of class, Professor Bazerman announces a game that seems innocuous enough. Waving a twenty-dollar bill in the air, he offers it up for auction.

Everybody is free to bid; there are only two rules. The first is that bids are to be made in $1 increments. The second rule is a little trickier. The winner of the auction, of course, wins the bill. But the runner-up must still honor his or her bid, while receiving nothing in return. In other words, this is a situation where second best finishes last.

Indeed, at the beginning of the auction, as people sniff out an opportunity to get a $20 bill for a bargain, the hands quickly shoot up, and the auction is officially under way. A flurry of bids follows. As Bazerman described it, "The pat­tern is always the same. The bidding starts out fast and furi­ous until it reaches the $12 to $16 range."

At this point, it becomes clear to each of the participants that he or she isn't the only one with the brilliant idea of winning the twenty bucks for cheap. There is a collective hard swallow. As if sensing the floodwaters rising, the stu­dents get jittery. "Everyone except the two highest bidders drops out of the auction," Bazerman explained.

Without realizing it, the two students with the highest bids get locked in. "One bidder has bid $16 and the other has bid $17," Bazerman said. "The $16 bidder must either bid $18 or suffer a $16 loss." Up to this point the students were looking to make a quick dollar; now neither one wants to be the sucker who paid good money for nothing. This is when the students adopt the equivalent of football's war-of­-attrition model. They become committed to the strategy of playing not to lose.

Like a runaway train, the auction continues, with the bid­ding going up past $18, $19, and $20. As the price climbs higher, the other students don't know whether to watch or cover their eyes. "Of course," reflected Bazerman, "the rest of the group roars with laughter when the bidding goes over $20."

From a rational perspective, the obvious decision would be for the bidders to accept their losses and stop the auction be­fore it spins even further out of control. But that's easier said than done. Students are pulled by both the momentum of the auction and the looming loss if they back down-a loss that is growing greater by the bid. The two forces, in turn, feed off each other: commitment to a chosen path inspires additional bids, driving the price up, making the potential loss loom even larger.

And so students continue bidding: $21, $22, $23, $50, $100, up to a record $204. Over the years that Bazerman has conducted the experiment, he has never lost a penny (he donates all proceeds to charity). Regardless of who the bidders have been-college students or business executives attend­ing a seminar-they are always swayed.

The deeper the hole they dig themselves into, the more they continue to dig."

No comments:

About the Author

The author is Naren, an independent thinker presently based at Chennai, India. Naren has an opinion on a range of issues. Will keep expressing them from time to time for the perusal of the world at large! He loves to receive feedback (Especially positive ones!) This blog will focus on matters pertaining to the wide world of finance, investments, thrift, etc. While reading, he'd like you to enjoy this blog and use its inputs effectively after reading the disclaimer at the bottom!

Member of Personal Finance Blogs of ...

Number of people who have cared to know more about Personal Finance before you ... ... ...

Disclaimer & other points to note

Please note the following points:

(1) Views expressed in this blog, including comments, are entirely personal and not meant as a specific recommendation to a particular individual. On the contrary, it is intended to make the readers think for themselves about the specific point of view that is expressed.

(2) It is based on the perfectly imperfect knowledge and wisdom (or lack of the same) of the author (of the blog or the original author of the content of the specific post), and to that extent, may at times appear to be (or actually be) biased. After all, the author is also human.

(3) The various posts on this blog represent the author's views / thoughts / observations at the time of posting the original entry. If the post is based on an external source, wherever the specific source is known, if something has been noted from another source (newspaper, website, etc.), the author of this blog will acknowledge the origin (and if possible, will also provide a link to the original article, news item, etc. The copyright of such articles, news items, etc. will continue to belong to those who are the original contributors of the same.

(4) The author reserves his right to change his mind from time to time and, as a result, post subsequent blogs which may appear to contradict earlier posts.

(5) He would love to take credit for his ability to either be firm in his convictions or for his ability to be flexible enough to change his opinions from time to time based on experience. Either way, he would love to take credit for the contents of the blog.

(6) And, no debits please! The author loves bouquets, but hates brickbats! This blog is only an expression of opinion and not a recommendation of any kind. The author will not compensate you in any way whatsoever if you ever happen to suffer a loss/inconvenience/damage because of/while making use of information in this blog.

(7) Considering his love to take credit, he would like you to give a clear reference to his blog's link whenever you quote from this blog (preferably in big bold legible fonts, with all due bells and whistles)!

(8) Feel free to challenge, disagree, dispute, question, or otherwise express your dissatisfaction of the contents in the comments section of each blog entry. But the author reserves the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever (abusive, profane, rude, or anonymous comments - or even just because he wishes to delete a comment for no reason!) - So keep it polite, please.

(9) Please do not give your personal information or any other confidential information (especially contact info) while sharing your comments. At the maximum, you may wish to add your email ID which can be used by the author if he wishes to get in touch with you directly. The net is a potentially unsafe and insecure place, with all sorts of hackers, et al, despite its great utility on a day-to-day basis!

(10) Please remember that Mr. N is likely to have a stake (both a financial stake and a stake of "image") in his views as expressed on this blog. Wherever possible, he will explicitly mention appropriate disclosures. However, it is safe to assume that he does, indeed have a personal interest in the views / thoughts / recommendations expressed by him on this blog.

One final note: If your comments agree, appreciate, praise-to-the-sky, laud, thank, or otherwise give any kind of positive feedback about the contents of this blog, they have a better chance of staying on the blog without being deleted!