Syria
is a terror state. It didn’t become that way overnight because of
the Arab Spring or the Iraq War.

Its people are not the
victims of American foreign policy, Islamic militancy or any of the
other fashionable excuses. They supported Islamic terrorism. Millions
of them still do.

They are not the Jews fleeing a Nazi
Holocaust. They are the Nazis trying to relocate from a bombed out
Berlin.

These are the cold hard facts.

ISIS took over
parts of Syria because its
government willingly allied with it to help its terrorists kill
Americans in Iraq. That support for Al Qaeda helped lead to the civil
war tearing the country apart.

The Syrians were not helpless,
apathetic pawns in this fight. They supported Islamic terrorism.

A
2007
poll showed that 77% of Syrians supported financing Islamic
terrorists including Hamas and the Iraqi fighters who evolved into
ISIS. Less than 10% of Syrians opposed their terrorism.

Why
did Syrians support Islamic terrorism? Because they hated
America.

Sixty-three percent wanted to refuse medical and
humanitarian assistance from the United States. An equal number
didn’t want any American help caring for Iraqi refugees in
Syria.

The vast majority of Syrians turned down any form of
assistance from the United States because they hated us. They still
do. Just because they’re willing to accept it now, doesn’t mean
they like us.

If we bring Syrian Muslims to America, we will
be importing a population that hates us.

The terrorism poll
numbers are still ugly. A poll this summer found that 1
in 5 Syrians supports ISIS. A third of Syrians support the
Al Nusra Front, which is affiliated with Al Qaeda. Since Sunnis are
3/4rs of the population and Shiites and Christians aren’t likely to
support either group, this really means that Sunni Muslim support for
both terror groups is even higher than these numbers make it
seem.

And even though Christians and Yazidis are the ones who
actually face ISIS genocide, Obama has chosen to take in few
Christians and Yazidis. Instead 98.6%
of Obama’s Syrian refugees are Sunni Muslims.

This is
also the population most likely to support ISIS and Al Qaeda.

But
these numbers are even worse than they look. Syrian men are more
likely to view ISIS positively than women. This isn’t surprising as
the Islamic State not only practices sex slavery, but has some
ruthless restrictions for women that exceed even those of Saudi
Arabia. (Al Qaeda’s Al Nusra Front, however, mostly closes
the gender gap getting equal support from Syrian men and
women.)

ISIS, however, gets its highest level of support from
young men. This is the Syrian refugee demographic.

In the
places where the Syrian refugees come from, support for Al Qaeda
groups climbs as high as 70% in Idlib, 66% in Quneitra, 66% in Raqqa,
47% in Derzor, 47% in Hasakeh, 41% in Daraa and 41% in
Aleppo.

Seventy percent support for ISIS in Raqqa has
been dismissed as the result of fear. But if Syrians in the ISIS
capital were just afraid of the Islamic State, why would the Al Nusra
Front, which ISIS is fighting, get nearly as high a score from the
people in Raqqa? The answer is that their support for Al Qaeda is
real.

Apologists will claim that these numbers don’t apply
to the Syrian refugees. It’s hard to say how true that is. Only 13%
of Syrian refugees will
admit to supporting ISIS, though that number still means that of
Obama’s first 10,000 refugees, 1,300 will support ISIS. But the
poll doesn’t delve into their views of other Al Qaeda groups, such
as the Al Nusra Front, which usually gets more Sunni Muslim
support.

And there’s no sign that they have learned to
reject Islamic terrorism and their hatred for America.

By
way of comparison, twice as many Iraqis see Islamic terrorism as a
threat than Syrians do and slightly more Palestinian Arabs view
Islamic terrorism as a threat than Syrians do. These are terrible
numbers.

And these are the people whom our politicians would have us
believe are “fleeing an ISIS Holocaust.”

Seventy-three
percent of Syrian refugees view US foreign policy negatively. That’s
a higher number than Iraqis. It’s about equal to that of
Palestinian Arabs.

They don’t like us. They really don’t
like us.

Obama’s first shipment of Syrians will include
1,300 ISIS supporters and most of the rest will hate this country.
But unless they’re stupid enough to announce that during their
interviews, the multi-layered vetting that Obama and other
politicians boast about will be useless.

It only took 2 Muslim
refugees to carry out the Boston Marathon massacre. It only took 19
Muslim terrorists to carry out 9/11.

If only 1 percent of
those 1,300 Syrian ISIS supporters put their beliefs into practice,
they can still kill thousands of Americans.

And that’s a
best case scenario. Because it doesn’t account for how many
thousands of them support Al Qaeda. It doesn’t account for how many
of them back other Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas that had
widespread support in Syria.

While the media has shamelessly
attempted to exploit the Holocaust to rally support for Syrian
migrants, the majority of Syrians supported Hamas whose mandate is
finishing Hitler’s work. The Hamas
charter describes a “struggle against the Jews” that
culminates in another Holocaust. Bringing Hamas supporters to America
will lead to more Muslim Supremacist violence against Jews in this
country.

But all of this can be avoided by taking in genuine
Syrian refugees.

While Obama insists on taking in fake Syrian
refugees, mainly Sunni Muslims from UN camps who support terrorism
and are not endangered in Jordan or Turkey, both Sunni countries, he
is neglecting the real refugees, Christians and Yazidis, who are
stateless and persecuted in the Muslim world.

Instead of
taking in fake refugees who hate us, we should be taking in real
refugees who need us.

Obama and Paul Ryan have claimed that a
“religious test” for refugees is wrong, but
religious tests are how we determine whether a refugee is really
fleeing persecution or is just an economic migrant.

The Sunni
Muslims that Obama is taking in do not face persecution. They are the
majority. They are the persecutors. It’s the Yazidis and the
Christians who need our help. And these real refugees, unlike the
fake Sunni Muslim refugees, are not coming here to kill us. They
truly have nowhere else to go.

Syria is a disaster because its
rival Muslim religious groups are unable to get along with each
other. Bringing them to this country will only spread the violence
from their land to ours. Instead of taking in the religious majority
that caused this mess through its intolerance, we should take in
their victims; the Christians and Yazidis who are being slaughtered
and enslaved by ISIS.

Syrian
Muslims are a nation of terrorist supporters. They destroyed their
own country. Let’s not let them destroy ours.

It’s time
that we kept our nation safe by doing the right thing. Let’s take
in the real Christian and Yazidi refugees and let the fake Sunni
Muslim refugees and terrorist supporters stay in their own countries.

By Jon Jay RayAmong psychologists, the most interesting answer to the above question is that given by John Hibbing. He might be called the "rockstar" of the debate. He attracts attention because he goes down to the physiological and brain-science level for his evidence and conclusions. He says that what you believe is a product of what you are. He does not stress it but "what you are" is genetically determined. So he is looking for inherited physiological differences between Leftists and conservatives.

And he has made some progress. He has put people through a number of experimental tasks and found that the reactions he observes to the tasks do indeed differ as between the two ideological groups. He describes his findings as showing that "disgust sensitivity" is the key variable. Conservatives are more easily disgusted. Most generally, they have a "negativity bias", according to Hibbing. And last year he put up a big paper summarizing the evidence for his view. It is "Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology"

I have long argued that Left/Right differences are largely inborn so my critique of Hibbing is not to contest his findings but to question the "spin" he puts on them. You can find a pretty good summary of his experiments here and I think it is easy to see that what Hibbing calls "negativity bias" could just as well be described as caution -- and caution has long been said to be the essence of conservatism. So Hibbing has confirmed some old wisdom rather than telling us anything new.

They say that "negativity bias" is characteristic of neurotics and that all the studies show that conservatives are not particularly neurotic. I observed that in my research too. So that is a bit of a stake in the heart for Hibbing. His "spin" on his results has undone him. If he had simply described conservatives as cautious, that criticism could not so easily be levelled at him.

Their second point is that there is no single Left-Right dimension. Economic conservatism and social conservatism are quite different. So Feldman & Huddy conclude that Hibbing's work is pretty useless because he has mixed up two different things. And it is indeed true that those two types of attitudes are very distinct factorially. I noted that in one of my papers long ago.

So they are right but I am prepared to defend Hibbing on that one. Although there are two distinctly different types of conservative attitude, they are not totally different. As I found, they do correlate, albeit weakly. And that is why the "big tent" of the GOP succeeds. The two types of conservative do find some things in common, a respect for the individual, mainly.

And as we see in "Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits", Hibbing uses the Wilson scale in his research, which is primarily a measure of social conservatism. And I have shown elsewhere that social conservatism is the big one for separating people. Economic conservatism is arguably more important to our future but it doesn't get the blood boiling like social issues do: Abortion, homosexuality, religion, tradition etc.

So Hibbing may not be measuring overall conservatism but he is measuring social conservatism and that is the most central sort of conservatism. So I would summarize his findings as showing that social conservatives are instinctively more cautious than others. And I see no problem with that.

Hibbing uses "Negativity" rather than "caution" to describe conservatives because he wants to rubbish conservatives (though he says he does not). "Negative" sounds a lot sadder than "cautious". But in so doing he lands himself in trouble. I have noted the Feldman & Huddy comment on that but there is in fact a bigger vat of boiling oil he falls into:

As is noted here, who are the "negative" people when it comes to global warming? Warmists are almost entirely Leftists but it is they who are vastly negative about the climate and our future. They predict imminent catastrophe -- while conservatives are mostly just amused by the scare. Conservatives say in summary that: "global warming is not a crisis, the likely benefits of man-made global warming exceed the likely costs, and mankind is not the scourge on Earth that liberals make us out to be"

And again, referring to conservatives simply as cautious would not enable that criticism. Warmists do say that they are the cautious ones but to swallow the arrant nonsense that is global warming would have to be a height of incautiousness. Conservatives just look at the evidence and see that there is no need for caution in the matter. Here's a graph of the amount of global warming we have had in the last 18 years -- none:

So two cheers for Hibbing. He has drawn attention to the biological basis of ideology but he should stop stretching the implications of his findings in a Leftist direction. He just makes a fool of himself with that stretch. He was pretty reasonable -- even humble -- in a 2012 paper. He should try more of that.

The all time top ten countries to hit
Paradigms and Demographics are: United States, Germany, France,
Russia, Ukraine, China, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Canada, Ireland.

For the month of November the top ten
countries are: United States,
Germany, Canada, France, Russia, Ireland, Australia, China, Portugal,
Ukraine.

This week it was: United States,
Germany, Australia, Ireland, France, Canada, Ukraine, Slovenia,
Portugal and Bulgaria. Not much from Russia or China this week.

As I've said in the past - I generally have no clue why people around the world are hitting P&D, but I'm always appreciative. Australia hasn't been big over the years, but for some reason they're surging this month, and today's stats have them second on the list. Germany, France the Ukraine and Bulgaria have been the most consistent, with Ireland now entering the top ten consistently, and a number of countries will jump in and out of the top ten. For whatever reason anyone shows interest in this blog - I wish to thank them. Best wishes to all.

"Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne is a hyperfeminist, a lesbian activist. She hates patriarchies, especially old white men who tell women what to do. But see a photo that she herself published, wearing a hijab [in white scarf] and sitting in the women's only section of an Ottawa mosque, like a good little subservient, submissive woman, obedient to sharia law! Of course, if sharia law were really in effect, she’d be thrown off the top of an apartment block, or hanged from a crane, which is the usual death sentence for homosexuality under radical Islam. This isn’t just a case of, anything for a vote. It’s an insight into her mind. She despises our western, Judeo-Christian culture. But she’s an obedient little girl when it comes to the most reactionary patriarchy in the world — radical Islam." Jon Jay Ray

But watch and I'll show you a photo that she herself published, wearing a hijab and sitting in the women's only section of an Ottawa mosque, like a good little subservient, submissive woman, obedient to sharia law!

Of course, if sharia law were really in effect, she’d be thrown off the top of an apartment block, or hanged from a crane, which is the usual death sentence for homosexuality under radical Islam.

This isn’t just a case of, anything for a vote. It’s an insight into her mind. She despises our western, Judeo-Christian culture. But she’s an obedient little girl when it comes to the most reactionary patriarchy in the world — radical Islam.....This appeared here......

My Take - As I've often said - leftists will adopt any philosphy that will advance the one and only universal moral foundation in leftism - say and do anything to gain power.

Clearly they weren't in the same area and this is clearly rigged, but it is an exact representation of the mentality of the left, and there's no fixing stupid. But the question I have is this: When does stupid become insanity?

By Bruce WalkerNazi Germany and the ideology which inspired it was so evil that when we won the Second World War, "de-Nazification" was the remedy. The Nazis had murdered millions of innocent people, conspired to begin an aggressive world war that plunged most of mankind into bloodshed and destruction, and preached a gospel of hate and lies and infected millions. De-Nazification was the right thing to do.

When the Soviet Union imploded twenty-five years ago, there was a compelling case to be made for de-Bolshevization. Communists had murdered many more innocent people than the Nazis – 100,000,000 is the conservative number French leftists calculated in The Black Book of Communism – the first mass genocide in modern Europe was not the Holocaust but the Holodomor, a term virtually unknown to most Americans.The Second World War was begun not by Hitler, but by Hitler and Stalin. Nazi Germany, until June 1941, had no more slavish lackey and no more devoted helper than Soviet Union and no greater "Fifth Column" in the democracies than communists in those nations......What could be worse than those party functionaries who presided over this wretched empire, which had been the loyal ally of Nazism? How about those fortunate enough to live safely in America, living in relative comfort and ease because of America, serving a foreign monstrosity like Communism while they sneer hatefully and mockingly toward the land that blessed them? How about some hideous creature like Dalton Trumbo?......Men like Dalton Trumbo and women like Betty Friedan, however, stayed slavishly devoted to this modern-day Beelzebub.
.....To Read More....

Eastern Europe is leading the way to protect the continent against colonizers from Islamic lands. Hungary is in the forefront, having erected a fence that is patrolled around the clock by Hungarian police and military. There is also support along the border from Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Slovakia as these nations partner together to protect themselves. In this video, the mayor of Assothalom (a rural town in Hungary situated along the southern border shared with Serbia) speaks about border security. And he does not mince his words. He acknowledges that all of Europe must be protected and defended or everyone will perish.....To Read More.....

My Take - I keep seeing the words Islamophobia, Xenophobia and racism being used by these leftist excusers of Muslim actions and the current crop of refugees to denigrate the sanity and morality of those opposed to the Islamization of the west and the immigration of more of these people. First, I would like to know why it is that not one Muslim country is taking these people in? Secondly, Islamophobia is an oxymoron. A phobia is is a mental disorder caused by an irrational fear of something. Does anyone really think fearing Islamists is irrational? As for the rest of the Muslims - they may be non-violent, but they support Sharia and those who are violent and the Islamization of the world, that's a center most teaching in the Koran. Fearing them in general isn't irrational. Xenophobia is defined as " an intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries". These people are feared and disliked because they're barbarians with a moral code that belongs in a sewer. Fearing and disliking them is not a mental issue - it's a reality issue. Then we have racism. Islam isn't a race - it's a political criminal organization masquerading as a religion. Let's try and get this once and for all. Fearing Islam isn't a mental disorder. It's clear thinking based on history and reality. And we have to stop listening to these insane leftists who attempt to obfuscate realty with insane rhetoric filled with logical fallacies. They've lost their minds - it's time for the sane to step up and say so. Did you ever wonder why a screwball like Trump is so popular? He has the guts to say what most people in this country are thinking and doesn't care what the world thinks. Especially the cloistered world of the leftist media, unlike so many politicians.

University of Missouri professor beat teenage relative for not wearing hijab: cops #Mizzou - Where does this fit into the Mizzou race narrative? Will the Huffington Post do a piece on this? Mizzou professor Youssif Z. Omar, 53, was at Hickman High School in Columbia, Missouri, on Tuesday when he spotted that the girl did not have the traditional Muslim headscarf. Officer Latisha Stroer told the Columbia Tribune in an email that Omar grabbed the girl “very violently by the hair.” He slapped her across the face, and pulled her by the hair down and flight of stairs and into his car. Where are the riots? Where are the firings? Where are the demands for expunging Islamic texts and teachings of misogyny and supremacism? Youssif Zaghwani Omar, 53, was arrested....

Dozens of Paris airport workers on terror watch list: report -
The question is, how many airport workers on terror watch lists are working at American airports?.....The security passes of 86,000 workers at Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris will be reviewed after it was found that 57 employees with access to airliners were on a terror watch list, according to a report.

Denmark: Syrian refugee breaks into house, tries to rape 8-year-old - Obama wants to bring this here: Denmark: Syrian refugee breaks into house, tries to rape 8-year-old. A 40 year old male asylum seeker from Syria have been sentenced to nine months in prison after he was convicted of an attempted rape of an 8-year-old girl in December 2014. The then 39-year-old man suddenly stood in the girl's room in the middle of the night. The girl screamed in horror, and it woke her parents who came to her rescue. After a fight between the offender and the girl's father, the now 40-year-old asylum seeker was arrested by the police.

India: Wife gangraped, husband divorces her through SMS(Short Message Service, This is a mechanism of delivery of short messages over the mobile networks) - In Islamic law, this misogyny is institutional and legal: “According to Sharia Law, a man can divorce his wife if he says 'talaq’ to her three times.” This treatment of women like commodities is a central element of the law and culture that Obama and other Western authorities demand that we respect.

But I’ve also written about the grotesque inefficiency and bloat at the Department of Transportation and urged that the building be razed to the ground. Today, I can’t resist turning my attention to the Department of Agriculture. This is another part of the federal behemoth that specializes in taking money from productive taxpayers and dispensing it to well-connected agri-businesses to maintain a system of subsidies and central planning so Byzantine that it would probably make a North Korean Commissar shake his head with bemusement.If you want to share my anger, read this column by Victor David Hanson. Here’s an excerpt to get your blood boiling........To Read More.....

I may have to change my mind. When asked a few years ago to pick which department in Washington most deserved to be eliminated, I chose the Department of Housing and Urban Development. And HUD unquestionably is a cesspool of waste, so it certainly should be shuttered. But the more I read about the bizarre handouts and subsidies showered on big agribusiness producers by the Department of Agriculture, the more I think there’s a very compelling argument that it should be at top of my list.Indeed, these giveaways are so disgusting and corrupt that not onlyshould the department be abolished, but the headquarters should be razed and then the ground should be covered by a foot of salt to make sure nothing ever springs back to life.That’s a bit of hyperbole, I realize, but you’ll hopefully feel the same way after today. That’s because we’re going to look at a few examples of the bad results caused by government intervention. To get an idea of the Soviet-style nonsense of American agricultural programs, a Reuters report on the peanut programs reveals how subsidies and intervention are bad news for taxpayers and consumers. Here’s the big picture.....To Read More......

ByFrank BianchiConsidering the Denver Post is a very liberal paper, I'm surprised they published this. This really shows how the hiring of illegals is false economic practice.Tina Griego is a Free-Lance reporter for the Denver Post. She writes some really good stuff and she is a strong advocate for LEGAL immigration. Homework on issues is part of her make-up and fabric... What if they left?Tinareally did her homework on this one. Best on the subject to date. It does not have a political slant to it, it’s just the facts: Not Democratic, not Republican, not Liberal and not Conservative.What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America? I, Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column titled, "Mexican Visitor's Lament." I interviewed Mexican journalistEvangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week. Hernandez said, "Illegal aliens pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes. What happens to your country's economy if 20 million people go away?"

Hmmm, I thought, what would happen? So I did my due diligence, buried my nose as a reporter into the FACTS I found below.It's a good question... it deserves an honest answer. Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration stopped. But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America? The answers I found may surprise you!In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico, it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons. It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested. Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again.In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grandchildren would move back "home," mostly to Mexico. That would save Colorado an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs. It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone. Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens. Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims would not have suffered death, accidents, rapes and other crimes by illegals.Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% dropout/flunk rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41 different languages. At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our gridlocked cities in Colorado. Denver's 4% unemployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America, the rule of law, and English. In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home,' the U.S. economy would return to the rule of law. Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage. Everyone would pay their fair share of taxes because they wouldn't be working off the books. That would result in an additional $401 billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.No more push '1' for Spanish or '2' for English. No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids. Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches. We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually. That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the ' 18th Street Gang' would vanish from our nation. No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans! No more foreign rapists and child molesters! Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock. Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens! America's economy is drained. Taxpayers are harmed. Employers get rich. Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to the aliens' home countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America's economy which currently suffers a $20 trillion debt. $20 trillion debt!!!At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle. At least 86 hospitals in California, Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act. Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders. Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities. It would also put the 'progressives' on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11% of our greenhouse gases.Over one million of Mexico's poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas, to San Diego, California, in what the New York Times called, 'colonias' or new neighborhoods. Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse. They live without sewage, clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation. The New York Times reported them to be America's new 'Third World ' inside our own country. Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias. (I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it's sickening beyond anything you can imagine.) By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico. We should invite 20 million aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or make a better life in Mexico. We already invite a million people into our country legally annually, more than all other countries combined. We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation. It's time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life.Interesting Statistics! Here are 14 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them:1. $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens (that's Billion with a 'B')3. $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens.4. $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they still cannot speak a word of English5. $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.6. $3 Million Dollars 'PER DAY' is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. That's $1.2 Billion a year.7. 28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens.8. $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare and social services by the American taxpayers. 9. $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US.11. During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from other terrorist countries. Over 10,000 of those were middle-eastern terrorists. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin, crack, guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border.12. The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families and friends.14. The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States!Total cost a whopping $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR! If this doesn't bother YOU, then there is no hope for any of us to continue as a country.

Ben Carson Visits Syrian Refugees in Jordan - I predict that this is the nail in the coffin of Carson’s presidential aspirations. A self-inflicted wound he won’t recover from. He played right into the hands of the media. Carson’s ascent was due, in large part, to his outspoken and frank observations on sharia and jihad in America. The migrant issue is a hot button issue, no doubt. One where reality and the media myth completely diverge. Far from a humanitarian crisis, the Muslim invasion of Europe will be its demise. No-go zones are proliferating and people can scarcely leave their homes for fear of their lives.

Sharia in the UK: Girl not allowed extra math classes because she didn’t wear hijab
- Authorities are investigating this school, while bringing in thousands more Muslims, who will set up more schools like this (or take over other schools and transform them the way they did this one). Do they really think that other Muslim schools will readily teach British values and not act in the way Park View School officials acted? Are UK authorities really unaware that this mistreatment of female students and banning of representational art and instrumental music is in accord with sharia, and thus they will inevitably have many, many more “Trojan Horse” schools?

The End ofAcademic Elites, By Mike Konrad
The internet has changed everything, so much so that even
I, a man who has been online for 19 years, am constantly amazed at the pace of
accelerated change. The printing press changed the world in a few decades in
the 16th century. The internet is even more revolutionary. Even more so than the press, the internet has evaporated
prior means of didactic instruction. The printing press created change, but
only the rich could afford to buy one. For less than $100 today, one can get a
domain and start a media empire on the web.

The standing joke about a
liberal is…“A liberal is somebody who is so open-minded that he won’t take his
own side in a fight.”And so it is
proving. The only problem with Obama being unable to take his own side in a
fight is that it is our side as well. And the rest of us are not ready to go
gentle – and take our families – into that beheading good night.What’s going on? Liberalism is the philosophy
of giving away that which has been built by its forebears. To liberals,
defending themselves, their society, their institutions, their customs, their
culture is anathema because that would offend the attacker! And they can’t have
that! Not giving offense is liberalism’s highest value.The people who built and/or are a part of
what is being attacked don’t count. Their sacrifice, their achievement in
having created what is being attacked make them privileged in the liberal mind
and therefore their opinion, their very existence, is invalid…… Liberalism
cannot defend itself, or us, because doing so would invalidate, would
evaporate, the mirage that is the world that it has constructed for itself.
Since liberalism regards all other cultures as superior to its own, if one of
those cultures is a ruthless, relentless warrior culture that cares only for
victory and dominance, liberalism has no vocabulary, no thought process, no
sense of self-preservation with which to arm itself against it. It cannot
defend itself against barbarism because it believes that the barbarians are
right……To Read More……

On Tuesday Nov. 17, a massive hurricane-force
windstorm slammed the Inland Northwest, notably northeast Washington
and the Idaho panhandle. Hundreds of trees came down. Thousands of branches
littered streets and intersections. Roofs flew off or were smashed by falling
trees. Three people died. Power poles – not just lines, but poles –
snapped like matchwood. Electricity across the two largest cities in the area –
Spokane and Coeur d’Alene – as well as most of the outlying region, was down
for anywhere from a few hours to 10 days…… Too many people make light of the
likely consequences. “We’d go back to the 1800s,” they snort. “Big deal. People
lived just fine in the 1800s.” If you think life in America
without electricity will merely revert us to pioneer days, you are dead wrong
(not literally, I hope). We wouldn’t regress to the 1800s; we would regress to
the 1100s or earlier. Life would become a bitter, brutal struggle for survival,
and many millions would die. Society thrived in the 1800s for
five very simple reasons: 1) a non-electric infrastructure already existed; 2)
people had the skills, knowledge and tools to make do; 3) our population levels
were far lower; 4) most people lived rurally and raised a significant portion
of their own food; and 5) there were relatively few people who didn’t earn
their way….. …..

Solar observers predict a
“Little Ice Age (LIA)” to arrive before 2100. While expert economists confirm
that a modestly warmer climate benefits both health and human prosperity, a
colder climate generally spells more sickness and poses real danger to
agricultural yields—with consequent famines and mass starvation. These
calamities can be overcome – through adequate and timely preparation of energy
supplies, water projects, and croplands. There is some urgency in preparing now
for the possibility of such a cold period, similar to the LIA that prevailed
off and on during 1400-1800 AD. It is likely then that tropical regions will
end up as the major sources of food and be called upon to supply the rest of
the world.….warmer climate benefits both health and human prosperity, a colder
climate generally spells more sickness and poses real danger to agricultural
yields -- with consequent famines and mass starvation……

Saturday, November 28, 2015

Mechanical Heart Valves: Longer Life for Younger Patients - A new Swedish study shows improved survivability in
relatively young heart patients opting for mechanical valve replacement, versus
those receiving the bioprosthetic version. This validates previous evidence
supporting the use of mechanical heart valves in middle-age patients. Read more

Glyphosate Safe To EFSA, Despite IARC’s Finding - Genetically modified salmon has finally gotten approval
from the FDA, making it the first GM animal in the United States to be cleared
for human consumption. But what does it mean for you? A whole lot more
sustainable, locally-grown fish.Read more

Flu-Shot Frequency: Annually Beats Occasionally - A recent Boston Globe article about flu vaccinations
raised the notion that those who receive a flu shot every year to have less
protection than those who get it less frequently. What does science make of
this? It's hard to say. But we say that some protection is better than none at
all.Read more

Nomophobia – Is Your Cell Phone Like A Service Dog - A new questionnaire assesses fear of not having your
smartphone - they call it nomophobia - no mobile phone phobia. Read more

First
Uterine Transplants in US Set to Begin - The Cleveland Clinic will soon be the first institution in the United States to perform uterine transplant surgeries. Transplantation surgery is performed in women who are born without a uterus, or have had uterine damage from infection or a procedure. These scenarios present the inability of a fertilized embryo to implant in the uterus where it needs to grow and develop. Read more

Mechanical Heart Valves: Longer Life for Younger Patients - A new Swedish study shows improved survivability in
relatively young heart patients opting for mechanical valve replacement, versus
those receiving the bioprosthetic version. This validates previous evidence
supporting the use of mechanical heart valves in middle-age patients.Read more

Glyphosate Safe To EFSA, Despite IARC’s Finding - Genetically modified salmon has finally gotten approval
from the FDA, making it the first GM animal in the United States to be cleared
for human consumption. But what does it mean for you? A whole lot more
sustainable, locally-grown fish. Read more

Flu-Shot Frequency: Annually Beats Occasionally - A recent Boston Globe article about flu vaccinations
raised the notion that those who receive a flu shot every year to have less
protection than those who get it less frequently. What does science make of
this? It's hard to say. But we say that some protection is better than none at
all.Read more

ACSH
Invited to White House to Advise on Tobacco Harm Reduction - The American Council was invited to the White House on
the day of the 2015 Great American Smokeout, to discuss regulating
cigarette-smoking cessation and harm-reduction tools that are available to
smokers looking to kick their deadly habit. Here are the recommendations we
made in the public's interest. Read more

20 Years Later, GM AquAdvantage Salmon Approved - Genetically modified salmon has finally gotten approval
from the FDA, making it the first GM animal in the United States to be cleared
for human consumption. But what does it mean for you? A whole lot more
sustainable, locally-grown fish. Read more

Alarming Rise in 3 Sexually Transmitted Diseases - The CDC reports that all three reportable sexually
transmitted diseases -- gonorrhea, chlamydia and syphilis -- are on the rise,
some alarmingly so. One health-care advocate says part of the problem is that
effective HIV drugs are creating a climate of safety, and that "we're a
victim of our own success.”Read more

Antibiotic Use in Animals Attacked by Pediatricians - Some bacteria have become resistant to many antibiotics,
leading many health officials to express concerns that soon we may not be able
to cure diseases that used to be susceptible to such drugs. Another possible
reason for this resistance is the non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in food
animals. Read more

Black Tea May Protect Bone Health for Elderly - A recent study suggests that drinking three cups of black
tea per day may strengthen otherwise fragile bones among the elderly, as well
as reduce the risk of illnesses such as cancer and heart disease. Findings were
linked to powerful flavonoids in tea that contain antioxidants. Read more

The Tryptophan-Sleepiness Link is a Big Turkey - It's irrelevant whether you like turkey or not, because
someone is going to be handing you a plate of it very soon. And after the meal
there's a good chance that you'll get sleepy. But will the cause of your
drowsiness be the turkey, the booze or your brother-in-law's tedious commentary
about his golf game? We explain. Read more

First Great Chemical-Cancer Scare? Cranberries - The first great chemical carcinogen scare put a damper on
many folks' Thanksgiving celebrations in 1959. A chemical used in cultivating
cranberries was found to cause cancer at high doses in rodents, and the Federal
health agency advised consumers to avoid cranberries. Utter nonsense, then and
now. Read more

Your Turkey May Be Organic, But It’s Not Natural - Sorry grocery shoppers, but all of today's domestic
turkeys -- even the ones labeled "organic" -- are actually GMOs.
Years of artificial selection, have made the genome of the turkey we eat
significantly different than the genome of wild ones. So unless you shot yours
in the woods, the turkey heading to your table isn't natural. Read more

Does Holiday Feasting Affect Obesity Rates? - The holidays are challenging for everyone's midsection
but they are a factor in the actual obesity rather than seasonal weight gain? Read more

Apple Pie, Mashed Potatoes and Natural Formaldehyde - Formaldehyde is a known toxin and a carcinogen. We know
this from real science, as well as hysteria-based groups like IARC which
designated the compound as a known carcinogen in 2004. So why in 2015 are all
Americans guaranteed to ingest this carcinogen on Thanksgiving day? Read more

China Uses CRISPR To Create Hulked-Out Animals - Chinese scientists have used CRISPR gene-editing tools
that have created animals with more muscle mass and hair. These experiments
have caused major debates and most people want to know what’s next? And what is
the limit? Read more

Cracking The Case Of Cage-Free Eggs - Taco Bell will join other fast food companies in the
movement towards cage-free eggs, but what does this label really mean? Read more

Should the New Hep C Drugs Be Used Sooner? - It is hardly news that Sovaldi and Harvoni, the
enormously effective new hepatitis C drugs, are quite costly. This has caused
some debate about when it is best to start using them. But, a new study says:
"The sooner the better." It is better to treat patients before liver
fibrosis is present. Read more

FDA Adheres to Science: No Mandatory GMO Labels - In 2012 the Center for Food Safety filed a petition with
the FDA asking that the agency require that foods produced from genetically
engineered (GMO) crops be labelled as such. Finally, the FDA has responded. It
said "no." Read more

Increasing warmer temperatures throughout the world may
produce a trend toward dictatorial governments in the opinion of Dr Clarence A
Mills, professor of experimental medicine at the University of Cincinnati. In
fact, Dr Mills believes that the rise to power of Adolf Hitler in Germany and
Benito Mussolini in Italy may be due in part to the gradual warming temperature
of the world.- The Mason City
Globe-Gazette, 27 March 1941

It was a time of yuppies, flash cars, shoulder pads and
big hair, but it appears the 1980s was also a key turning point for the world's
climate, research has suggested. Scientists have discovered there was a huge
shift in the environment that swept across the globe affecting ecosystems from
the depths of the oceans to the upper atmosphere. They said an abrupt spurt of
global warming, fuelled by human activity and a volcanic eruption in Mexico, is
believed to have triggered these changes between 1984 and 1988. The researchers
said the global warming that occurred in the 1980s was the largest shift in the
climate to have occurred in around 1,000 years. --Richard Gray, Daily Mail, 24
November 2015

Britain’s green energy barons are getting huge taxpayer
subsidies to install diesel generators — exactly the kind of polluting energy
source their wind and solar farms are meant to replace. Wind and solar power
firms are being encouraged to install the generators, which pour out CO2, a
greenhouse gas, and toxic nitrogen dioxide, on their sites in order to provide
standby generating capacity and prevent the lights going out during periods of
peak demand. The Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc) is offering
consumer-funded subsidies to firms that install such “short-term operating
reserve” because Britain has invested so little in large new power stations
that there is a risk of winter power cuts. --Josh Boswell and Jonathan Leake, The Sunday
Times, 22 November 2015

European Union’s stringent renewable energy requirements
are forcing coal-based power plants to use biomass fuel. Swaths of woodlands in
Southeastern United States are being cut down to fuel the biomass boom across
the Atlantic. A new report by the Natural Resources Defense Council has pointed
out that 15 million acres of unprotected forests in the Southeastern United
States, home to more than 600 imperiled, threatened or endangered species are
at risk due to booming wood exports EU and UK. Debbie Hammel, the director of
the Land Markets Initiative at NRDC says that Europe must cut down the
subsidies for biomass based power plants to save forests in the United
States.--Kesavan Unnikrishnan, Digital Journal,
24 November 2015

Despite a 63% drop in rigs drilling for oil in the three
key shale regions since last November, oil production in those regions has
barely budged from peak levels in 2015. In fact, new wells in the Bakken are
pumping up to 50% more oil than those drilled at the beginning of 2015.
Operators are finding ways to do more with less. If you think this kind of
resilience is without precedent, just look at natural gas. There are 199 rigs
drilling for natural gas today, down from more than 1,600 in 2008. And yet,
U.S. shale gas production today is at record levels even as prices test new
lows. --Sam Ori, The Wall Street
Journal, 20 November 2015

It’s routinely claimed that climate-change-induced
drought in Syria was a major factor in triggering the Syrian civil war, the
Syrian refugee crisis and the rise of ISIS. But are these claims supported by
the data? Average annual rainfall during the 2006-2011 period was only 9% lower
than average annual rainfall over the preceding 55 years. The driest year
during the period (2011) was only the seventh driest on record and 2006-2011
was only the 13th driest six-year period on record. Clearly the crop failures
in the farming villages around Aleppo – which undoubtedly occurred – weren’t
caused by a drought of Biblical proportions. In fact there doesn’t seem to have
been a drought at Aleppo at all. --Roger Andrews, Energy Matters,
24 November 2015

The UK’s global network of climate diplomats is facing
the chop days before negotiations on a new UN deal to tackle global warming
open in Paris. More than 100 posts are under threat, with the Foreign and
Commonwealth Office (FCO) set for 25-40% resource budget cuts by 2019-20 under
a spending review due out on 25 November. --Ed King, Climate Home, 25
November 2015

The Department for Energy and Climate Change day to day
resource budget has been cut by 22%, it has been announced. Chancellor George
Osborne launched the Spending Review this afternoon announcing he was “building
Britain to become prosperous” by taking the “difficult decisions” to bring debt
down. He told the House of Commons: “We are committed to the low carbon sector
and we show our commitment to the Paris talks next week. But we believe going
green should not cost the earth.” --renews,
25 November 2015

One of the problems with being a PR guy for an
environmentally minded billionaire is that you sometimes find yourself having
to utter complete drivel in public fora. There has been a lovely example of
this in recent weeks, when, in a letter to the FT, Lord Stern claimed that 7
million deaths each year were caused by pollution derived from fossil fuels.
This was disputed by Matt Ridley, who pointed out in another letter that most
of these deaths were actually caused by burning wood and dung. The mess into
which Stern has got himself has now been firmly laid bare by Bjorn Lomborg,
whose letter to the FT today sets out the figures in gory detail. --Andrew
Montford, Bishop Hill, 25
November 2015

Former Tory MP Tim Yeo has lost his libel action over
a“cash-for-advocacy” claim which he said trashed his reputation. Yeo had asked
for substantial compensation over three reports in the Sunday Times, in June
2013, which followed a lunch the previous month with two undercover journalists
from the Insight team posing as representatives for a solar energy concern in
the Far East. They alleged that he was prepared to, and had offered to, act in
a way that was in breach of the Commons code of conduct by acting as a paid
parliamentary advocate who would push for new laws to benefit the business of a
client for a daily fee of £7,000 and approach ministers, civil servants and
other MPs to promote a client’s private agenda in return for cash. --Press Association, 25 November 2015

A new Fox News poll finds that in the wake of the Paris
terror attacks, the issue of terrorism has become the top concern of American
voters. The new poll also found that Americans are largely unconcerned with
climate change, which the Obama administration has repeatedly pointed to as the
nation's top security threat. Only 3 percent of respondents said that global
warming was the most important issue facing the country today, down from 5
percent in a Fox poll released last August. --Dan Joseph, MRC TV News, 24 November 2015

There will be further cuts to government schemes designed
to encourage low-carbon energy and greater efficiency, the chancellor said on
Wednesday. George Osborne announced that the charge suppliers must levy on
customers to help pay for efficiency measures, such as insulation, will be reduced.
He said the move would lower customer bills, saving an average of £30 a year
for 24m households. But it is also the latest sign that he is prioritising
affordability over attempts to cut emissions. --Kiran Stacey and Michael
Pooler, Financial Times,
25 November 2015

The Government has been fiercely criticised after it
quietly scrapped a £1bn project to cut carbon emissions and removed more “green
crap” from household energy bills. In a move the Treasury omitted to mention in
its Autumn Statement announcements, a pilot project to develop a new technology
that can capture the emissions from gas and coal plants and pipe them
underground has been scrapped. Experts said ending the project would make it
much harder for the UK to meet its ambitious climate change targets, given the
central role that gas is set to play in the country’s energy sector. --Tom
Bawden, The Independent,
25 November 2015

Britain has scrapped plans to spend up to 1 billion
pounds ($1.5 billion) to help commercialize the technology for capturing carbon
dioxide emissions from power plants and storing them underground, the
government said on Wednesday, putting two major projects at risk of being
canceled. The announcement comes just days before negotiators from more than
190 countries are due to meet in Paris to thrash out a global deal to cut
greenhouse gas emissions blamed for rising temperatures. Britain had previously
viewed CCS as a vital tool to help it meet its legally binding target to cut
emissions by 80 percent on 1990 levels by 2050. -- Susanna Twidale, Reu Reuters, 25
November 2015

Spanish renewable energy company Abengoa is on its way to
becoming the biggest bankruptcy case in Spanish business history. – El Pais, 26
November 2015

Abengoa is a Spanish company that was another of
President Obama’s personally picked green energy projects, and it’s now on the
verge of bankruptcy, potentially saddling taxpayers with a multibillion-dollar
tab and fueling the notion that the administration repeatedly gambles on losers
in the energy sector. The renewable energy firm said Wednesday it will begin
insolvency proceedings, a technical first step toward a possible bankruptcy.
International banks’ total exposure to a full Abengoa bankruptcy stands at
about $21.4 billion, according to Reuters news agency, meaning the company’s
downfall would end up being the largest bankruptcy in Spanish history. --Ben
Wolfgang, The Washington
Times, 25 November 2015

Public support for a strong global deal on climate change
has declined, according to a poll carried out in 20 countries. Only four now
have majorities in favour of their governments setting ambitious targets at a
global conference in Paris. In a similar poll before the Copenhagen meeting in
2009, eight countries had majorities favouring tough action. Just under half of
all those surveyed viewed climate change as a “very serious” problem this year,
compared with 63% in 2009. The findings will make sober reading for global
political leaders, who will gather in Paris next week for the start of the
United Nations climate conference, known as COP21. --Matt McGrath, BBC News, 27
November 2015

About Me

Green is a mixture of blue and yellow. That is the only factual definition of green that will stand the test of time. After that; any other definition is a corruption of a perfectly nice color. I have been an exterminator for 35 years. I have served as a trustee on industry association boards representing pesticide and fertilizer applicators actively for almost 25 years. I believe that what we do isn't just a job; it's a mission! We are that thin gray line that mans the wall telling the world; "no one will harm you on my watch". I also believe that to be green is to be irrational, misanthropic and morally defective. They are the barbarians at the gate we have to stand against. Our greatest worry is those within who support and facilitate their misanthropic goals.