THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF THIS BLOG IS TO SHARE WITH THE READER ISSUES OF HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY GLOBAL SIGNIFICANCE FROM A PROGRESSIVE PERSPECTIVE.
ORDER OF MOST READERS OF THIS BLOG: USA, RUSSIA, FRANCE, UNITED KINGDOM, GERMANY, UKRAINE,CANADA, INDIA,and CHINA.

Thursday, 16 July 2015

THE PALESTINIAN QUESTION and the US-IRAN DEAL

Iran as the de facto Hegemonic Power
in the Middle EastDoes the US-Iran agreement
(14 June 2015) that calls for Iran to abandon nuclear weapons ambitions in
exchange for lifting of Western sanctions mean a new era in relations between
the US and the Middle East? Syria, Turkey, and Egypt publicly praised the deal
as a step forward because it would mean greater regional stability and greater
economic integration that would benefit all the economies. The Palestinians are
also hopeful that the international community would exert pressure on Israel
for a political solution to settle the chronic dispute. Unlike Iran, however,
the Palestinians have no leverage wile Israel enjoys enormous influence because
the US is solidly behind it as it has been since the Truman presidency.

There are those who applaud
the US for ignoring Israel and its extreme right-wing allies in the US that
have done everything in their power to sabotage the negotiations between Iran
and the West. Naturally, there are the pro-defense industry elements that
regret these developments as much as those hiding behind a right wing ideology
to justify animosity of any kind of rapprochement between the West and Iran, an
Islamic republic that has been openly anti-West since 1979. Others see this
deal as an opportunity to contain Israel from pursuing military adventures, as
well as Saudi Arabia funding jihadists while claiming to support the struggle
of the Palestinians but all along siding with Israel on its opposition to Iran
as the major power that has a dominant voice to determine the regional balance
of power.

No matter where one stands
ideologically and politically, the Iran deal has sent a very strong signal
across the world that the US and its EU partners finally acknowledge that Iran
is the most important regional power in the Middle East after a power gap
created by the US-led overt and covert military destruction of Iraq and Syria.
After decades of trying to contain Iran and undermine it in every possible
manner from economic sanctions to military action in surrounding countries, the
US and its EU partners have finally acknowledged that Iran is the catalyst to
the regional balance of power in the Middle East.

On major issues that
include stabilizing Iraq and defeating the jihadist ISIS fanatics that the US
and its Arab and Turkish allies helped to create in order to bring down Syria’s
Assad regime it is important to have Iran’s cooperation. Moreover, it is futile
to isolate Iran from the Western World, given the increasing global position of
China that has cordial relations with Iran. In short, the strategic and
economic benefits to the Western countries and multinational corporations are
such that it was simply detrimental to their interests to continue the
sanctions when it was possible to use them as a bargaining chip for preventing
Iran developing nuclear weapons.

What does the Iran-US deal
mean for the Palestinians? Israel was and remains adamantly against Iran-US
rapprochement and has done everything it can to make sure it is never
implemented. One reason is that it feels threatened, although it is Israel that
actually possesses nuclear weapons today not Iran, and although the US
guarantees its security. Israel simply does not want a US-Western
acknowledgment that Iran is indeed the real regional power that has the
capacity to contain its neighbors, including its arch enemy Saudi Arabia. The
US, however, is driven by the reality of limited resources, including the
prospect that foreign aid including aid to Israel must be trimmed back to
realize savings to pay down the debt. In short, Israel sees the US as a less
friendly than ever because Washington has failed to follow Tel Aviv in foreign
policy, regardless of the US pledges about providing for Israel’s security.

Does the new role of Iran
as the presumably acknowledged hegemonic power of the Middle East mean a
settlement of the Palestinian Question? Some may believe so, just as they did
when the Cold War ended when there was no reason to hide behind the East-West
confrontation as a pretext to perpetuate the status quo as the permanent
occupation of Palestinians by Israel. Certainly, the South African apartheid
system came down, the Irish conflict ended, so why not a solution for the
plight of the Palestinians after seven decades? On the surface, it certainly
appears that the Iran deal works in favor of the Palestinians, but it actually
strengthens Israel because it is on the same side as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and
the Gulf states, while Egypt is positioning itself to see what perks it can
derive from any forthcoming deal on the Palestinian issue. In the final analysis,
major US and European corporations, top banks, airplane and energy, consumer
product and pharmaceutical companies, all wanted to be a part of the rapidly growing
Iranian economy in which China and Russia enjoy a role. In short, the benefits
of integrating Iran are simply enormous for the 21st century. Can
the same be true if Israel settles its chronic dispute with the Palestinians, or
is it simply an issue of ensuring stability that defense contractors and right
wing ideologues oppose in any case because this is contrary to their interests?

Israel and Human RightsIs there a chance that
Israel will stop violating the human rights of Palestinians because of the
Iran-US deal? On the contrary, my guess is that Israel will become even
harsher. World-wide moral support for the Palestinians on the part of people,
organizations such as the United Nations, and governments is very nice, but it
hardly constitutes leverage to move the process forward. Boycotting Israeli
businesses in the same manner as US businesses boycotted South African
businesses shortly before Mandela is more tangible and some companies are doing
as much, but this too is not having much impact because it is not like the Western
sanctions on Iran. Precisely because Israel is adamantly opposed to any change
in the domestic or regional status quo, it is more likely to move in the
direction of military confrontations with the Palestinians than a political one
based on the Iran-US deal. This means more human rights violations, no matter
what the UN and world community say about Israel.

On 23 July 2014, Navi Pillay, UN high
commissioner for human rights, announced that Israel's military action in Gaza
during July may constitute a "war crime" because the targets were
children and the demolition of houses. The UN Human Rights Council in Geneva
has convened an emergency discussion on the matter. However, there is
absolutely no doubt that the US will block any effort to bring to justice the
war criminals, largely because Washington had given Israel the green light on
the operations that resulted in war crimes.

There is no doubt that even the most monstrous human being that is still in
possession of his faculties, a modicum of moral fiber, and just a touch of
humanity would not admit that it is appropriate to kill children, that they are
collateral damage victims, or any other excuse that we have heard from Tel Aviv
and its supporters in the US and the West. This is not a lesson in moral
absolutism, but at least human beings ought to agree on some basic principles,
including killing of children is immoral and a war crime to be punished
accordingly. The exact same principle is applied to all people, including Hamas
when it too engages in killing Israeli children, and the same punishment must
be accorded to that group as well for its war crimes. The World Court at the
Hague has only proceeded with cases against Africans and some from the former
Yugoslav Republic, leaving out anyone from the white-dominated Western World,
thus making a mockery of the court.

At the root of this conflict is US complicity because of massive aid provided
to Israel on a sustained basis, but also broader Western complicity that simply
follows the US lead on Middle East policy. The other major issue is Arab
indifference, largely because the West has been very successful in keeping the
Arabs divided, and they have been using the Palestinian conflict largely as a
pretext to maintain the status quo, while in essence cooperating with the US
that always backs Israel no matter what war crimes it commits. In addition,
Saudi Arabia sees Iran as an arch-enemy largely because it realizes that Iran
is the hegemonic regional power. Therefore, Saudi Arabia has been financing
jihadists in Syria and Yemen with the aim of undermining Iran, a futile
endeavor that has gone nowhere, except to enrich Western defense contractors
selling weapons to Saudis.

The Israeli war and
collective punishment of Palestinians that has women and children as the
majority of the victims is causing a great deal of guilt among humane and
rational secularist Israelis who want to see an end to the conflict and a
permanent political solution. Demonstrating Arab indifference to Palestinians,
an article in the Jerusalem Post noted that during the war (July 2014) the Arab
media was more interested in the Soccer World Cup out of Brazil than it was on
what Hamas and Israel were doing. The Israeli newspaper notes that with the
ISIS Jihadists in Syria and Iraq attracting attention, a possible Kurdish
declaration of independence from Iraq, and a host of other areas of conflict in
Muslim countries, from Yemen and Libya to Afghanistan Arab media has not taken
as much notice. This view was confirmed by Turkey’s Premier Erdogan who
insisted that Arab indifference is as reprehensible as the silence of the US
and the entire Western World over this issue.

It is estimated that in the last fourteen years, about 1400 Palestinian
children have been killed and many more wounded; more than seven thousand
children have been detained, interrogated and tortured by Israeli authorities;
about half of the children exposed to intermittent war conditions suffer from
post-traumatic stress disorders. Israeli policy under the current and past
regimes has been that the only children taken into account as human are
Israeli, while Palestinian children are those belonging to terrorists. This
view was very clearly expressed in a letter from Prime Minister Netanyahu to
Obama in December 2012 on the occasion of the Sandy Hook massacres in the US.
Reverting to the “victimization” mindset and using the reprehensible holocaust
of Jews by Nazis, the Israeli government gives itself license to engage in
collective punishment and insist that it is beyond accountability of
international war crimes laws. The reason for this is only because the US that
enjoys military superpower status provides all the diplomatic, military,
economic, and massive propaganda cover for Israel whose only issue is security
for itself even if it means killing en masse and indiscriminately.

The more serious issue is how the US and Western media cover the slaughter of
Palestinian children by Israel. Amid the mass destruction of Gaza, the US and
most Western media outlets have been focusing on other stories. Even the New
York Times that likes to claim “objectivity” has been almost silent on the
massacre of Palestinian children, while devoting lots of space to the three
Israeli teens missing since July 2, 2014. The three innocent Israeli teens
deserve lots of coverage without question, but do the 1400 massacred
Palestinian deserve any? Perhaps more absurd as well as grossly inaccurate
is another New York Times story on
why many Americans are siding with Israel the militarist aggressor intent on
ethnic cleansing rather than the Palestinian victims.

To justify its biased
pro-Israel coverage, the New York Times
argued that Arab Spring failed to bring about democracy in the Arab World, thus
Israel stands alone as a “true democracy”, no matter its war crimes against
Palestinians as the UN has concluded. In the entire history of Israel is there
any time when war was launched against Palestinians and Arab neighbors that the
US and the media-manipulated public opinion ever sided with Palestinians?
Blatant racism on the basis of religion and skin color is very evident here,
but even worse, we have a very clear case of journalism that is hardly worthy
of the title.

The public would have far
greater respect for such media outlets if they simply stated that they are
mouthpieces of Tel Aviv and Washington, rather than projecting their reporting
as “objective”. Instead, we have a double-standard practiced on a sustained
basis not just by the US media, but the European as well, trying to find just
about any pretext to demonize the victims in the conflict. Under such
conditions, why is anyone surprised when Turkey’s premier Erdogan lashes out at
racism of the West against Muslims? All studies show that Western media is
heavily pro-Israel and anti-Muslim, depicting Muslims as terrorists with strong
racist undertones and stereotyping them, while personalizing the stories of the
Israelis. In short, there are no limits to the political propaganda promoting
militarism and aggression and suppressing the option of a political solution
when it comes to resolving the conflict in question. The role of the media is indeed
an obstacle to cultivating a constructive climate to reach peace between Israel
and the Palestinians, especially in the absence of Palestinian leverage that
Iran enjoys internationally.

This is not to argue that
Hamas is made up of boy scouts that the Arabs are angels by nature and the
Israelis are inherently evil. Nor does it help those interested in a
Palestinian solution to argue that Israelis are the new Nazis in the Middle
East, despite their policy of apartheid that is very similar to that of former
South Africa. Israel has every right to self-defense and peace within its
own borders. Because Israel never approved of US diplomatic solutions in Syria
and Iran, nor US rapprochement with Iran, Obama had to give the green light to
the Gaza military operations in July 2014, while in return promising as few
million dollars to the Palestinians to take care of their medical and other
needs.

The ultimate
insult in military confrontations that Israel engages periodically is that the
US, which has approved and backed them, steps in after mounting world protests to
present itself as the "peacemaker" and objective intermediary. That
the militarist super power behind Israel tries to present itself as the peace
broker is insulting to all people, but especially to Palestinians who know that
the US has had a role in killing their children and backing the status quo of
no permanent peace on the Palestinian Question.The media
always projects the image of Israel as the real victim in the wars it launches
against the Palestinians and the US as the peace broker. Anything that the UN does to
condemn Israel has no impact because it enjoys US support in the Security Council
where veto is readily exercised, no matter the magnitude of the problem, from
war crimes to seizing land illegally. Although Israel has historically ignored
the UN on many issues from seizing Palestinian land and resources to
systematically violating human rights, it has suffered no consequences because
the US as patron state is behind Israel.

There are those who maintain
that every conflict in which Israel has been engaged involves economic
interests, directly or indirectly. For example, it is no secret that Israel
controls the water resources, but it also has an interest in securing control
of energy resources. It has been in negotiations with Cyprus for undersea
explorations of natural gas and oil, and it has also been interested in
undersea oil of Greece. When Russia decided to cut out Israel from the GAZPROM
gas pipeline and run it from Syria and Lebanon to Gaza, Israel went to war in
June 2014. The idea is to deprive Palestinians from having any access to
natural resources that can be used as leverage or would make Palestinians more
self-sufficient.

One-State or Two-State Solution?The two-state solution has
failed because it brought nothing but war and destruction to the Palestinians
for many decades. Moreover, the end of the Cold War with the US decision to
replace the Cold War with the war on terror meant that the stigma of having the
label “terrorist” as Israel and its right-wing allies in the US and Europe
insisted on calling Palestinians cried out for a new strategy. Working within
the system to support left wing Israeli parties as part of a coalition is one
strategy to change the political dynamics inside Israel. The failure of uprisings
and guerilla military conflicts, combined with the absence of any Arab state
backing Palestinians, the US insisting on blind support of Israel no matter how
destructive its policies and detrimental to US interests have convinced some
Palestinians that an internal solution is about the only leverage the people
have left. Some view guerrilla war as a thing of the past, or they associate it
with ISIS and al-Qaeda or other jihadists groups, rather than liberation
armies. Of course, Israel and the Western press and governments go out of their
way to portray Palestinians as terrorists simply because they are fighting for
a homeland and against colonial oppression.

Abandoning the armed struggle
and working within the system would mean securing basic rights and sharing
power at all institutional levels, at least in theory. This would then be the
Palestinian leverage that is more powerful theoretically than anything coming
from the outside world. If there is no leverage that the Palestinians can use
to negotiate a solution to their satisfaction, then the only thing left to do
is work within the Israeli parliamentary system. Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu with the full support of right wing political elements is a
committed Zionist who wants neither the two-state solution nor the single-state
state solution as many Palestinians envision it. Palestinians know that the
majority of Israeli Jews strongly oppose a single-state solution and it is not
just the Zionists who want a religious identity to transcend the democratic
image of the state. The Russia-Jewish influx has made the right wing parties
more popular and a right wing coalition regime will probably remain in power
for many years, unless an economic crisis impacts the country in a detrimental
way.

The rightist trend of
Israeli politics has been a reality in the last two decades. This does not necessarily
explain the unwillingness to find a solution to the Palestinian Question as
some Jewish and Palestinian analysts believe because they hold hope for a
solution with a leftist regime that favors a secular rather than a Zionist
state. After, all, for decades the center-left was in power and the
Palestinians suffered wars and repression just as they have under the right
wing. That the center-left identified with the secularists and not the Zionists
like the right wing is far more interested in co-opting the Palestinian
population in total and extending the same rights and privileges is an
attractive idea. However, even non-Zionists committed to Israel as a secular
state may have a concern about integrating the entire Palestinian population
that would then have a major voice in public policy and society’s direction. There
is the fear that more than 3 million Palestinians who live in Jordan, Lebanon,
and Syria would return and become the majority, a fear hardly justified by the
reality of economic limitations within Israel for all of those people to make a
living.

A more likely scenario is
that the Palestinians as a minority in society would meet a fate no different
than black South Africans after Nelson Mandela ended apartheid. Another likely
scenario is that the Palestinians would be no different than American blacks
before the Civil Rights movement. I am not at all amazed that according to a
public opinion poll in Israel, one-third to as many as one-half of Israelis do not
want Palestinians working for them or work next to them. Denying Palestinians
the right to live in peace and harmony because Zionist ideologues leading the
country have convinced the masses to live in fear of the Palestinian “terrorist
monster”, because a handful of weapons producers want to make greater profits
by keeping conflict alive, because the Jewish Diaspora feels betterabout themselves supporting militarist
solutions with its checkbook, because the Israeli lobby is extremely powerful
in US politics is at the core of maintaining the status quo that is as criminal
as it was for the Christians to stand by and watch governments from the Black
Death to the Third Reich persecute European Jews.

Are there enough
enlightened Israeli Jews to collaborate with Palestinians in finding common
ground through the one-state solution process? My view is that it is worth
further exploration because Palestinians have no friends in the outside world
that would do anything for them other than express moral support. Palestinians
must at least explore the solution from within and see how far they get while
at the same time see who on the outside is able to offer assistance toward a
solution both sides would accept. The two-state solution has run its course as
has the idea of peace negotiations that Israel under the right wing regime will
not accept without essentially forcing Palestinians to live in ghettos and
reduced to the class of the “untouchables”. Integration within Israeli society
will not be difficult because of profound suspicions on both sides, and in the
end it may not work any better than Jim Crow laws in the US.

Despite the Iran deal, US
behavior in the Middle East has been to destabilize the region, to keep it as
integrated as possible to the West by any means including military intervention,
and to continue providing massive foreign aid to Israel that contributes to
instability and opposes any kind of settlement with the Palestinians unless it
is one that reduces the tiny occupies lands into an even worse ghetto than it
has been. In short, US foreign policy does not offer hope for a Palestinian solution
just because Iran struck a deal with the US and the West.

The new role of China in
global affairs may indeed change the dynamic inside Israel and force the US
into a compromise. In August 2014, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi announced
China's five-point peace proposal on settling the Israel-Palestine conflict,
which included abandoning military solutions and seeking a political settlement
in order to advance regional and global stability.

It is of the utmost importance that all people recognize basic human
rights laws as the UN has estiablished them, and this includes Arabs and
Jews. Negotiations cannot take place otherwise. All forms of racism and
disrimination must never be a part of a dialogue to settle any dispute,
otherwise there cannot be a permanent solution, Hugging each other will
not do it, but seeking a politically, socially, economically and
culturally viable solution with which the majority - certainly not all
people - will be able to live with is the goal. To do this, Israel must
realize it is fighting the battles of the mid-20th century in the early
21st century. The only issue is to have Israeli
government move forward with a solution based on human rights as well as
social justice for all people who live in Israel and the Territories.
The object is not to promote hatred on any side, not against the Jewish
people not against Arabs, not against anyone, and certainly no
double-dealing Saudi Arabian style. This too is a dead-end strategy and
eventually it runs out of steam.

Unless there is goodwill to sit
together and find a solution to this issue, I just do not see how this
is in the interests of the the Palestinians but especially Israel that
will find itself increasingly isolated by the world community as more
governments and companies refuse to do business with it. Already, there
are corporations under pressure to divest and China has set terms of its
own in order to do business there. C hina wants Israeli technology, but
it can get it elsewhere. Israel needs Chinese investment and does not
wish to be left out. China is already economically nmber one in the
world - PPP terms according to the IMF - and number one economic
presence in Africa, As the century unfolds, China will replace US
influence not just in Africa but in the Middle East. Unlike the US,
China will not cave in to Israel's political will on the Palsestinian
Question because the internal and international dynamics are very
different for China than the US. China is a prominent player
in Africa and will be even more so in the 21st century, so it has a
major interest in regional stability at a time the US has been working directly
and indirectly to create instability. While China’s role can be significant and
will become even more so in the decades ahead, without the US stepping forward
to lead on this issue now, the otherwise politically divided Palestinians are
left on their own to pursue varieties of solutions, which includes working
within the Israeli parliamentary system to influence progressive politicians
into reaching a permanent settlement. Israel will be wise to look
down the road and figure out if it wants peaceful co-existence with the
world's number economic power as the US will cut aid to Tel Aviv, or
whether it wants to pursue Zionism and hardhsip that comes with it in
every respect.

"A
gripping, passion-filled, and suspenseful tale of love, betrayal,
political and religious intrigue, this novel entices the reader’s
senses and intellect beyond conventions. Slaves to Gods and Demons
takes the reader through a roller coaster enthralling journey of
personal trials and triumphs of a family emerging vanquished and
destitute after World War II.

Narrated by a young boy, Morfeos, modeled after the Greco-Roman pagan
deity of sleep and dreams, the book reveals the soul of a people trying
to ascertain and assert their identity while rebuilding their lives and
recapturing the glory of a lost civilization.

Seeking liberation from restraints of time, social conventions, and
binding traditions, the deity of dreams provides the conformist and the
free-spirited characters in the novel with venues for redemption that
are mere paths toward illusions. Exploring the complexities of human
relationships shaped by priest and politician alike, the novel rests on
the central theme that life is invariably a series of illusions, some
of which are euphoric, most horrifying, all an integral part of daily
existence.

Striving for purpose amid life’s absurdities after the destruction of
western civilization in two global wars, the characters in Slaves to
Gods and Demons struggle between holding on to the glory and grandeur of
a pagan legacy and the Christian present shaped by contemporary
secular events in Western Civilization."