Glenn has been fighting cancer for a few years now. †He used to post regularly on TheologyWeb, but his last post was about 6 months ago when he declared he wasn't interested in fighting Creationists anymore in his time left.

Don't know his current medical status.

--------------JoeG: And by eating the cake you are consuming the information- some stays with you and the rest is waste.

I have to say, I didn't find it depressing. I found it honest and reflective. I'm not remotely religious, but if that's how people make sense of their lives, good luck to 'em. I'm not above mocking dumbness, but ... on bigotry, he has a point. If someone is stupid and religious ... it's the stupidity, stupid. It's not the being religious.

I wish him well.

--------------SoapySam is a pathetic asswiper. Joe G

BTW, when you make little jabs like ‚ÄúI thought basic logic was one thing UDers could handle,‚ÄĚ you come off looking especially silly when you turn out to be wrong. - Barry Arrington

Be forewarned it's pretty depressing. †I'm afraid Morton is going all John Davidson, turning into an angry nutter recluse with less grasp of reality every day. †Or maybe it's the chemo affecting him.

Very sad. † :(

Age affects the mind. I can't say how but I can feel it. But i've been rational all my life since four years old and don't expect that to change. Unless something outside of my control - God forbid - should happen.

I guess that given the opportunity, irrational religion may corrupt an otherwise rational mind.

Glenn is claiming copyright on those pages. I doubt that is valid unless he paid for the server on which they were published. But it would be a good idea for people to save them in case they disappear again.

--------------Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

Glenn is claiming copyright on those pages. I doubt that is valid unless he paid for the server on which they were published. But it would be a good idea for people to save them in case they disappear again.

Copyright would belong to the the person who wrote the material.

(Unless he was paid to write the material specifically by a publisher which seems unlikely).

--------------"Itís not worth the effort to prove the obvious. Ridiculous ideas donít deserve our time. Even the attempt to formulate ID is a generous accommodation." - ScottAndrews

That's not automatically true, and on many forums it's entirely false, The copyright may belong to the forum. Take a look at the bottom of this page.

I will only say that considering the concept of fair use for educational purposes, copyright may be moot. And when arguments are made in public that may influence court decisions or legislation, I think it will be difficult to get this toothpaste back in the tube.

--------------Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.