<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why haven’t national media outlets reported on the vile and violent rants of the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) thugs whose 2008 voter intimidation tactics got a pass from the Obama administration? Simple: Radical black racism doesn’t fit the Hope and Change narrative. There’s no way to shoehorn Bush-bashing into the story. And, let’s face it, exposing the inflammatory rhetoric of the left does nothing to help liberal editors and reporters fulfill their true calling — embarrassing the right.

This week, Justice Department whistleblower J. Christian Adams came forward with damning public testimony about how <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Obama officials believe “civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities.”</span> In the wake of Adams’ expose on how the Obama DOJ abandoned default judgments against the NBPP bullies for the sake of politically correct racial politics, a shocking video clip of one of the lead defendants in the Philadelphia voter intimidation case resurfaced on the Internet. It shows bloodthirsty King Samir Shabazz during a 2009 National Geographic documentary interview spewing:

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>“You want freedom? You’re gonna have to kill some crackers! You’re gonna have to kill some of their babies!”</span>

These NBPP death threats and white-bashing diatribes are nothing new to those who have tracked the black supremacy movement. In August 2009, nearly a year ago, I reported on a sign on display outside NBPP defendant (and elected member of Philadelphia’s 14th Ward Democratic Committee) Jerry Jackson’s home. It reads: “COLORED ONLY: No Whites Allowed.”

In July 2009, I interviewed poll watcher/witness Christopher Hill, whom Shabazz and Jackson called “cracker” several times while Shabazz brandished his baton.

“They physically attempted to block me,” Hill recounted. He also saw a group of elderly ladies walk away from the polling site without voting while the duo preened in front of the entrance. “If you’re a poll watcher, you shouldn’t be dressed in paramilitary garb,” Hill said, as he wondered aloud at what would have happened if he had showed up in the same sort of costume.

In May 2009, I reported on the affidavit of civil rights attorney and poll watcher Bartle Bull, who witnessed the NBPP thuggery in Philadelphia and reported on billy club-wielding Shabazz’s election day boast: “You’re about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.”

In the fall of 2008, just days before he showed up to hector white poll workers, Shabazz told the Philadelphia Inquirer:

<span style='font-size: 14pt'>“I’m about the total destruction of white people. I’m about the total liberation of black people. I hate white people. I hate my enemy… The only thing the cracker understands is violence… The only thing the cracker understands is gunpowder. You got to take violence to violence.”</span>

The desire to kill, subordinate and demonize white people is a staple of NBPP propaganda. An NBPP Trenton, N.J., chapter “block party” music video posted on YouTube calls on black followers to <span style='font-size: 14pt'>“bang for freedom,” “put the bang right into a cracker’s face,” and “if you’re going to bang, bang for black power … hang a cracker … if you’re going to bang, bang on the white devil … burying him near the river bank with the right shovel … community revolution in progress … banging for crackers to go to hell, we don’t need em.”</span>

Chanting “Black Power,” Minister Najee Muhammad, national field marshal for the New Black Panther Party, and Uhuru Shakur, local chairman of the Atlanta NBPP chapter, issued a pre-Election Day 2008 threat to “racists and other angry whites who are upset over an impending Barack Obama presidential victory.” Said Muhammad: “Most certainly, we cannot allow these racist forces to slaughter our babies or commit other acts of violence against the black population, nor our black president.”

That’s rich, given that the only racists talking about slaughtering babies are the ones with New Black Panther Party patches on their puffed chests.

If a Tea Party activist threatened to kill the babies of his political opponents, it wouldn’t just be front-page news. It would be the subject of Democrat-led congressional investigations, a series of terrified New York Times columns about the perilous “climate of hate,” a Justice Department probe by Attorney General Eric Holder, a domestic terror alert from Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and another Important Teachable Moment Speech/Summit from Healer-in-Chief Barack Obama.

But with the racism shoe on the other foot, <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Team Obama and its media water-carriers are exhibiting the very racial cowardice Holder once purported to condemn.</span> Thanks to Obama’s feckless Department of Injustice, these black supremacist brutes are free to show up on the next national Election Day at polling places in full paramilitary regalia with nightsticks, hurling racist, anti-American epithets at those exercising their right to vote and at those protecting the integrity of the electoral process.

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Obama officials believe “civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities.”</span>

LWW </div></div>

I guess selective law enforcement is just further proof of the racism of this president.
(I wonder how much the NBPP contributed to his campaign)

Steve

Qtec

07-12-2010, 06:25 AM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Obama officials believe “civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities.”</span>

LWW </div></div>

I guess selective law enforcement is just further proof of the racism of this president.
(I wonder how much the NBPP contributed to his campaign)

Steve </div></div>

So I guess this <span style='font-size: 14pt'>'claim'</span> made by a <u>Bush drone</u>, someone given a job because he was a loyal Bushite, is enough for you to make a judgement?

Q

LWW

07-12-2010, 09:07 AM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Qtec</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pooltchr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> <span style='font-size: 14pt'>Obama officials believe “civil rights law should not be enforced in a race-neutral manner, and should never be enforced against blacks or other national minorities.”</span>

LWW </div></div>

I guess selective law enforcement is just further proof of the racism of this president.
(I wonder how much the NBPP contributed to his campaign)

Steve </div></div>

So I guess this <span style='font-size: 14pt'>'claim'</span> made by a <u>Bush drone</u>, someone given a job because he was a loyal Bushite, is enough for you to make a judgement?

Q </div></div>

No, it doesn't. But this claim in combination with the regime's actions ... which back the claim up ... is enough for me to make a judgement.

OTOH ... dearest leader telling you that it's Bush's fault is enough for you to make a judgement.

LWW

llotter

07-12-2010, 09:18 AM

I just can't believe anyone can come to the defense of such vile language, even setting aside the racism. It is not coincidental that the anti-religious crowd has trouble distinguishing right from wrong.

LWW

07-12-2010, 10:00 AM

As long as it supports the party they will tolerate anything.

LWW

hondo

07-12-2010, 09:51 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LWW</div><div class="ubbcode-body">As long as it supports the party they will tolerate anything.

LWW </div></div>

Nice to see you and lotter are still buddies.
I guess you've forgiven him for calling Obama a "ni**er."
After all, it was just Obama.
As long as he's in your political camp, posting skinhead links
isn't a big deal, is it, Larry?

Qtec

07-13-2010, 04:28 AM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I just can't believe anyone <span style='font-size: 20pt'>can come to the defense</span> of such vile language, even setting aside the racism. It is not coincidental that the anti-religious crowd has trouble distinguishing right from wrong. </div></div>

Who has done this? Not one poster has defended the words spoken by the "kill a cracker'" nut job.

I gave you the opportunity to lash out at lotter for linking
us to that skinhead site but you ignored my several bumps
because of partisan politics.
What a hypocrite you are!

Sev

07-15-2010, 07:39 PM

Not much action by the libs on this one.

I figured Gayle would find some way to blame Bush and absolve the Ghetto trash for his racist rant.

hondo

07-15-2010, 09:54 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sev</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Not much action by the libs on this one.

I figured Gayle would find some way to blame Bush and absolve the Ghetto trash for his racist rant. </div></div>

Has nothing to do with Bush. lotter proudly linked us to one of his skinhead sites.
I called on Larry and Steve to sever relations with lotter and they refused.
If you can tell me why you think Gayle and Bush have anything to do with that, I'm listening, Sev.

hondo

07-15-2010, 09:55 PM

OK, I get it. You were talking about the original thread.
Why did you respond to my post, then?

LWW

07-16-2010, 04:39 AM

Are you kidding?

H has worn his fingers to the bone making a moral equivalence argument while Q and crew have been in self flagellation sessions on the topic in other concurrent threads.

With this topic I have finally become convinced that there is nothing the far left will not overlook ... although the pass given over dearest leader's support of infanticide should have convinced me.

I figured Gayle would find some way to blame Bush and absolve the Ghetto trash for his racist rant. </div></div>

Has nothing to do with Bush. lotter proudly linked us to one of his skinhead sites.
I called on Larry and Steve to sever relations with lotter and they refused.
If you can tell me why you think Gayle and Bush have anything to do with that, I'm listening, Sev. </div></div>