President Trump had paid a hefty advance to the Jews. He did (almost) all they wanted for their Jewish state: he promised to move the US embassy to the occupied Jerusalem thus legalising their annexation of the holy city; he condoned their illegal settlements, he gave them starred positions in his administration; he told the Palestinians to drop their case in the ICC or else, he even threatened Iran with war. All that in vain. Jewish organisations and Jewish media attack Trump without slightest hesitation and consideration. His first step in curbing the soft invasion wave had been met with uniform Jewish vehemence.

He was called a new Hitler and accused of hatred of Muslims: what else could cause the President to arrest, even for a few months, the brave new migration wave from seven Middle Eastern states? Today he singles out Muslims, tomorrow he will single out Jews, said Jewish newspapers. Migration is the lifeblood of America, and the Muslim refugees are welcome to bring more diversity to the US.

Massive demonstrations, generously paid for by this notable Jewish philanthropist Mr George Soros, shook the States, while judges promptly banned the banning order. They insisted the orders are anti-Muslim, and therefore they are anti-constitutional. Somehow the constitution, they said, promises full equality of immigrants and does not allow to discriminate between a Muslim and a Christian.

This sounds an unlikely interpretation of the US Constitution. The US, and every other state, normally discriminates, or using a less loaded word, selects its potential citizens. The choice of seven states hasn’t been made by Donald Trump but by his saintly predecessor: President Barack Obama, this great friend of Muslims, made the choice personally some years earlier. So Trump had made a most moderate and modest step in the direction of blocking immigration by picking states already selected by the Democratic President.

One could reasonably claim that people of the seven states have a very good reason to hate America, and the reasons were supplied by previous US Presidents.

Libya, the most prosperous North African state until recently, had been ruined by President Obama: NATO invasion had brought Libya down; instead of stopping migration wave Libya had been turned into a jumping board for the Africans on their way North.

Syria is another Obama’s victim: by his insistence that ‘Assad must go’, by massive transfer of weaponry, money and equipment (remember white Toyota pickups?) to the Islamic extremists, he ruined this country.

Iraq has been ruined by President Bush Jr: he invaded the most advanced Sunni state, broke it to pieces and gave the centre of the country to the Isis.

ORDER IT NOW

Somalia has been ruined by President Bush Sr: he invaded this unfortunate country in the early nineties, when the USSR collapse allowed him to do so under the UN flag. Since then Somalia has become the supplier of choice of migrants and refugees for Sweden (there they formed the biggest community in Malmo and elsewhere), the US is also keen on getting them.

Yemen has been destroyed by Obama with Mme Clinton playing an important role: she facilitated delivery of weapons to Saudi Arabia in real time as they bombed Yemenis.

Sudan was bombed by President Clinton; afterwards this country had been dismembered and separate South Sudan had been created. Both halves became dysfunctional.

Iran is the odd one in the Magnificent Seven. It has not been invaded, has not been bombed, just threatened with invasion and bombardment for many years since President Carter. This country has no terrorists, it did not fail, its citizens are not running seeking for asylum. It was placed on the list by President Obama, who planned to bomb it, but never got to do it.

While Bush, Clinton and Obama bombed and invaded these countries, the Democratic humanitarians including their Jewish leaders just applauded and asked for more bombs. But they became appalled when Trump promised: no more regime change, end of “invade the world/invite the world” mode. Wikileaks put it well: bomb the Muslims, and you are fine; ban the Muslims, and you are the enemy.

Apparently, the people who instigated the Middle Eastern wars wanted to create a wave of refugees into Europe and North America in order to bring more colour and diversity to these poor monochrome lands. Welfare state, national cohesion, local labour and traditions will disappear, and these countries will undergo a process of homogenisation. Never again the natives will be able to single out Jews, for there will be no natives, just so many persons from all over the world, celebrating Kumbaya.

The Jews will be able to get and keep their privileged positions in Europe as they do in the US. They won’t be alone: by their success, they will establish a pattern to copycat for whoever wants to succeed in the new world, and masses of imitation-Jews will support the policies of real Jews.

Still, Jewish insistence on the Syrian refugees’ acceptance and on Muslim immigration in general is a strange and baffling phenomenon. Hypocrisy is too mild a word to describe that. We may exclude compassion as a cause for it. There are many thousands of natives of Haifa in Israel who suffer in Syria and dream to come back to their towns and villages, but the state of Israel does not allow these Syrian refugees to return for one crime: they aren’t Jews.

Israel accepts Jews only; and American Jews do not object to it; they do not compare Israeli leaders with Hitler or Trump. Israel had build a wall on its border with Sinai, and this wall stopped the black wave of African migrants. American Jews did not shout “No wall, no ban” in front of Israeli Embassy. Mystery, eh?

ORDER IT NOW

Kevin MacDonald wrote a thoughtful piece trying to unravel the mystery, Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees? and published it on January 17, a few days before Trump’s inauguration and full three weeks before the subject moved to the front burner. KMD correctly predicted that Donald Trump won’t appeal for “national unity” in his Inaugural Address, though this was the guess of mass media. Moreover, KMD correctly predicted that “Trump will announce an immediate pause in “refugee” admissions, currently surging, to be followed by a zero quota for the next fiscal year. There would be hysteria, in which the major Jewish organizations would, almost certainly, join. My (KMD’s) question: why would they do that?”

KMD provides a few possible answers, but none answers his own question. The world is full of troubles, and the US can get as many refugees as they wish from the Ukraine or Brazil, from China and Central Africa, without an anti-Israeli angle.

I’d suggest a simple explanation. Jews want to import Muslims to fight Christ and the Church.

Muslims of the Middle East are not, or weren’t, anti-Christian; they co-existed for millennia with their Christian neighbours. In Palestine, Christians and Muslims lived together and suffered together under the Jewish yoke.

But recently a new wind has blown in the Muslim faith, the wind of a very strong rejection of whatever is not strict Sunni Islam of the ISIS brand. Their first enemy is Shia Islam, but Christians follow Shias as a second-best object of persecution. The much softer Muslim Brotherhood has also hardened towards Christians. In Gaza, Hamas (a branch of MB) delivers friendly speeches, but the Christians are leaving the Strip very fast. MB rule in Cairo was considered anti-Christian by their Copt neighbours. So the new refugees from ISIS-touched lands (six out of Trump’s Seven: Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan) have been possibly infected with anti-Christian tendency.

It is almost a superfluous quality, anyway. The Muslims are being used as silent partners in the Jewish war on the Church. Instead of saying: “We, Jews, do not want to hear church bells, see Christmas scenes and hear Christian blessings”, these modest and retiring people usually refer to Muslims. Muslims do not want to hear church bells and see Christmas trees, they say. We Jews are just more considerate towards our Muslim brethren, so we notice that, while you brutes do not. Muslim sensitivities are already quoted in Germany to exclude pork-based local delicacies and to ban Christmas celebrations. It doesn’t matter that normally Muslims do not object to Christmas celebrations, as we know from our experience in Palestine. The Jews and other enemies of the Church say it all the same.

With the new ISIS-infected Muslims, the war on the Church will proceed even better. For sure, the US judges like the Seattle one will ban Christmas celebrations in a few years’ time citing the same refugees they insist on delivering to America’s shores.

The war on Christ and the Church is the most important element of Judaism. Wherever Jews succeed, the Church suffers, and vice versa. Israel, the Jewish state, has been located at the cradle of Christianity not by whim of Zionists: actually, the leading Zionist Theodore Herzl called for establishing the Jewish state elsewhere, from Uganda (modern Kenya) to Argentina. But the struggle against Christ necessitated their choice of Palestine with its deep Christian roots.

ORDER IT NOW

The most popular Jewish early medieval text glorified Judas for his victory over Jesus Christ. Fight against the Church and Christ in-formed Jewish weapons: media and money. The Church was an enemy of moneylenders; interest has been forbidden by the church, but it was used by Jews to accumulate their vast capital to be used against the Church.

As for media, the present concentration of almost all mass media in Jewish hands began in France of 19th century, where Jews formed a conspiracy to own and control media and they used it with great success against the Church during the Third Republic, notably in connection with Dreyfus Affair. (I previously wrote about it in a review).

The Jews usually acted in union with Protestants, as they were also enemies of the Church. Protestants, certainly, believed they were using the Jews for their own benefit, but in the end, separate and mutually hostile Protestant Churches submitted to the single will of Jews. This is why Jewish positions are so strong in the US in the absence of a single national church. Judging by the migration affair, it appears the Jews believe they can make a next step in their fight with Christ: by using the Islamic fanatics as a cover, they plan to push the church underground, out of public space altogether.

Much of the future developments depend on the will of President Trump. He fights against incredible odds. His idea to use Zionists against prevalent Jewish positions meanwhile does not work. “His” Jews are under attack as traitors to the Jewish cause. “Kushner is bad for Jews”, says Haaretz. Indeed, Jews have more important things to care than the Jewish state, and they are united for diversity, in other words, for more migration from the Middle East.

He should stop bumping the closed door. Forget the embassy move, forget pussyfooting with other Zionist dreams, and first of all, forget attacking Iran. If the Zionists would deliver Trump the wholehearted support of their American brethren, it would make some (not much) sense; but in the existing circumstances, none whatsoever. If Israel is threatened, then, perhaps, Zionists will be able to prevail upon their liberal cousins and convince them to think more of Israel and less of diversity. Perhaps is the key word.

Avoiding wars is another secret of success. The US spends too much money on wars. Keeping out of Ukrainian and Syrian mess is perfectly possible; spending money in America will improve Trump’s popularity and undermine the adversary. The US working class could be his best supporter, for these people are losing in case of wars and of immigration.

Meanwhile Trump is doing fine. He is doing what he promised; he defended Russia while pushed to denounce them; he tries to stop migration. He even tried to remove the weapon of holocaust from Jewish hands by not mentioning Jews while referring to Holocaust. Jews already called him “a holocaust denier”. This is a good sign. Let us hope he will prevail.

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back – on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet – who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said “Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!”. I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can’t wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming “mainstreamed” – Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you’d expect – and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations – instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. “Weak” China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. “Weak” China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

Part of that irony must be the crowd that, by dint of knowledge no other part of the world but the West would have ever produced, means technology no-one else would have ever invented, strong of sets of ideas and a vision that no other culture would have ever imagined, has realized the West's inferiority.

And, via an electronic device that would have never existed (or maybe only some thousands years afterwards), through the technology of the Internet, they spread their wisdom.

You may say that without the West everybody would have been prevented from realizing how ugly the West were :) .

sociopathic social relations between men and women

This is the first time I see the psychological category of sociology applied to the relations between the two sexes.I am not saying I disagree, I am saying I struggle to apprehend what you do mean.In the evolutionary battle of life, males and females play the role of rivals. Obviously, submission of one side extinguishes conflict (for example in the most socially advanced countries of the West, the war of the sexes is currently paused: males have submitted themselves). Otherwise, there is fighting, by various means: I guess this is what you call sociopathy, but I am unsure.

Jews no longer call it just the holocaust Its now the European holocaust and every country in Europecwas implicated, even the countries that fought the Germans and neutral countries. Probably the Azores, Iceland and Malta as well.
And of course The Pope directed the holocaust from his fortress in the Vatican.

They hate Europe because the Europeans managed to control them until the 19th century and they despise America because we have been so good to them.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

I can vouch for that!

Right here, on UR, I was told something similar, i.e., that there was no point in Giraldi’s piece, "Taking Down" British Officials” examining “how the Israeli Embassy in London connived with government officials to “take down” parliamentarians and government ministers …” because everyone does it. It should be expected behavior, obligatory, even.

I replied that if that’s how the game is played, then I expect to hear no more whining about “The” holocaust because, well, what would you expect? Shit happens, so perhaps we should just forget about it.

A couple of the mouthy punks had piled on me, but I haven't heard from either one since.

I must say - as a Gentile, and a lifelong admirer of the Jewish Genius (which has brought SO much to the table, in terms of European Culture) - I fear for the future of the Jewish People, wherever they may reside, if they do not start soon to acknowledge OPENLY the existence of a Jewish Mafia (IMMENSELY wealthy, powerful, and influential) which has brought SO much suffering to the World (Jews included)...................and begin to speak out AGAINST it ("Not in OUR name" etc etc).

And they ALSO need to drop what seems to be an almost REFLEXIVE "Next year in Jerusalem" sentimentality about Israel - WHATEVER crimes it perpetrates.

In short, the Jewish People need - as a matter of urgency, I feel - to use their Collective Intelligence (something with which they have been most GENEROUSLY endowed by God/Life/The Universe) to the Greater Good - not only of themselves, but of the whole of Humanity.

These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.

See https://theintercept.com/2016/02/22/saudi-christmas-present/
https://www.democracynow.org/2016/8/29/greenwald_why_did_saudi_regime_other
http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187
and a plenty of other references

Beautiful piece, Mr. Shamir. How you manage to write reflectively and hopefully about tactical politics is a source of wonder.

Trump is also trying, as part of his cheerleading efforts in the fight for America’s soul, to bring back God into the public consciousness. Not only in the inauguration, he will also finish brief speeches with “God bless America”. I count that effort as important as his immigration/Russia stances.

He has that in common with his Russian counterpart. As Benedict XVI recently said of Putin: “I certainly believe he is –a man of power of course– somehow affected by the necessity of faith. He is a realist. He sees how Russia suffers from the destruction of morality. Even as a patriot, as someone who wants Russia to have great power again, he sees that the destruction of Christianity threatens to destroy Russia. … He has now even, as he gave the Papa (Pope Francis) an icon,made the sign of the cross and kissed it..”

Mr. Shamir, since you’ve written about Dreyfus, would you consider doing a piece about the French candidates? Fillon and Le Pen? Fillon comes from the Vendée, as you may know, Le Pen from… Le Pen. I’d be interested in your insights.

Why do Jews support the Muslim migration of from Middle East to western countries?

Jews try to save Israel whose possibilities of survival in a hostile Arab surrounding are not looking too good. The Arab country with the best economic development in the last thirty years, thus becoming more and more a danger to Israel in its neighborhood, was Syria. Israelis had an enormous interest to destroy it. That is why Israel is strongly supporting the ongoing war of the West against Syria.

During the cold war, the immigration of dissidents from the eastern block into western Europe helped to destroy the communist block. It was often the best and brightest who decided to leave their homes in the eastern block thus weakening this block. The West is now using the same system against the Arabs. They try to weaken Syria using the same instruments they used against the communists, that is the Geneva Refugee Convention and the UNHCR. Jews support this policy because it strengthens the position of Israel in the Middle East. The people they want to convince to leave Syria are the gifted students, the entrepreneurs, the excellent doctors and teachers of Syria. Only if great numbers of Arabs, be they Christians or Muslims or of any other belief, leave the Middle East, Israel can survive.

During the cold war, the immigration of dissidents from the eastern block into western Europe helped to destroy the communist block. It was often the best and brightest who decided to leave their homes in the eastern block thus weakening this block.

Lol, nope. It were either the Jews or dissidents. And, frankly, the USSR lost little to non "brainpower" by kicking SoLZHEnytsin out.

"The people they want to convince to leave Syria are the gifted students, the entrepreneurs, the excellent doctors and teachers of Syria. Only if great numbers of Arabs, be they Christians or Muslims or of any other belief, leave the Middle East, Israel can survive."

You nailed it. That is exactly why there is such a push for refugees. I am not a person who opposes immigration, I believe if there is a country willing and people willing to, then it is fine as long as it is done by the correct and established means of the receiving country. But I am also not fool enough to see that these refugees, bombed and slaughtered at home, are being used as a weapon in a much larger game (if they know it or not).

The ones who flee war zones are usually the ones with the means to do so. And that usually means the educated, and often wealthy, class. I can tell you from very close experience that Syria experienced an economic boom when the rest of the world was was suffering in 2008. This was entirely due to the Iraqi influx that began in 2003. Who were those Iraqis? Mostly well off, highly educated, refugees who transferred their money and business to Syria. By 2008 they were well established and were approximately 10% of the population. I don't mention this to say that this is what will happen wherever refugees go, I'm using this to illustrate that the people that a society really need to keep it afloat are the first ones to leave during times of strife. Because they have the means. And someone certainly wants all of these people to leave their homes in the Arab countries.

"The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone."

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back - on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet - who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said "Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!". I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can't wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming "mainstreamed" - Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you'd expect - and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations - instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. "Weak" China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. “Weak” China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

Part of that irony must be the crowd that, by dint of knowledge no other part of the world but the West would have ever produced, means technology no-one else would have ever invented, strong of sets of ideas and a vision that no other culture would have ever imagined, has realized the West’s inferiority.

And, via an electronic device that would have never existed (or maybe only some thousands years afterwards), through the technology of the Internet, they spread their wisdom.

You may say that without the West everybody would have been prevented from realizing how ugly the West were .

sociopathic social relations between men and women

This is the first time I see the psychological category of sociology applied to the relations between the two sexes.
I am not saying I disagree, I am saying I struggle to apprehend what you do mean.
In the evolutionary battle of life, males and females play the role of rivals. Obviously, submission of one side extinguishes conflict (for example in the most socially advanced countries of the West, the war of the sexes is currently paused: males have submitted themselves). Otherwise, there is fighting, by various means: I guess this is what you call sociopathy, but I am unsure.

Well, science and technology made us lose touch with what makes life satisfying. As life became progressively unhappy in industrial economies, we became suicidal and nihilistic. Hence, our "strength" turned out to be our undoing, in the end.

Conflict can be resolved on the basis of mutual interests in a fair and moral manner, and in fact is all the time. The inevitability of conflict does not mean you have to become a sociopath - use deceit and exploitation to dominate others. That's a choice on how to respond to conflict, the PUA choice. Furthermore, just as there is conflict in relations between the sexes, there is also a great deal of shared interests and complementarity, that can serve as the basis for harmony. You can choose to ignore that if you wish.

"Evolutionary psychology" is more of a rationalization for certain modern thought trends than it is anything objectively scientific.

You got it backwards: "through the technology of the Internet, they spread their wisdom." The wisdom was there. And it was known universally. And then came technology of media that could perform mass brain washing on unprecedented scale. An the wisdom and knowledge was lost. For example the knowledge about Jews and Judaism. Look for 19 century and early 20 century books. You may still find it there. Mass media buried it. And internet is even worse.

Men and women are not "rivals" at all when it comes to perpetuating one's family/genes and one's nation. That's part of the twisted thinking that Soros et al. have used to split men from women in an unnatural way.

Operation Chaos: Opération Miscegenation: Divide/Pollute/Predate from within, It’s a form of agriculture. The f’n Eloi always winds up invited for dinner by the Morlocks!
(H.G. Wells)

Apparently, the people who instigated the Middle Eastern wars wanted to create a wave of refugees into Europe and North America in order to bring more colour and diversity to these poor monochrome lands.

[… there will be no natives, just so many persons from all over the world, celebrating Kumbaya.

The Jews will be able to get and keep their privileged positions in Europe as they do in the US.

It will be good to be M O T ( a member of the Tribe) in those times.

This also is key:

They won’t be alone: by their success, they will establish a pattern to copycat for whoever wants to succeed in the new world, and masses of imitation-Jews will support the policies of real Jews.

masses of imitation-Jews

This is already way into fruition, with the obvious fact of Askenazi inclusion to the equation. Or even Neocon transitionals. Not just about religion, not just about race, but all about ID. Funny how it’s usually the not too pure that draw the lines of exclusion so tight.

Was this part of the phenomena that inspired the French writer DeToqueville to predict a class would emerge in a naive “American Democracy” that would eventually abscond with the loot by self dealing out of the Treasury!

Well, George Washington virtuously refused a salary when he took the job of commander in chief of the revolutionary army.
He asked only his expenses. A year later his expenses came to $400,000 in 1776 money. Congress paid it off, grudgingly And quickly put him on a straight salary of around $50,000.

Or maybe it is that since the beginning you’re off the mark with your jewish conspiracy, aren’t you ?
Make no mistake, I appreciate your various analysises on various topics, but I never understood your obsession with the Jews and the ‘sionist empire’. For years it’s obvious the Jews/sionists don’t rule the world :
- Ukraine neo-nazi coup d’Etat
- Israeli trend towards Russia and the Eurasian Union
- Demonization of Israel’s candidate Trump
Not enough ? Come on, you’re too smart for that…

Or maybe it is that since the beginning you're off the mark with your jewish conspiracy, aren't you ?
Make no mistake, I appreciate your various analysises on various topics, but I never understood your obsession with the Jews and the 'sionist empire'. For years it's obvious the Jews/sionists don't rule the world :
- Ukraine neo-nazi coup d'Etat
- Israeli trend towards Russia and the Eurasian Union
- Demonization of Israel's candidate Trump
Not enough ? Come on, you're too smart for that...

Ukraine neo-nazi coup d’Etat

Who’s calling the shots? Who wields most of the power while neo-nazis do the grunt work? Who sponsors Right Sector? Who promoted Femen’s anti-Yanukovych antics?

@ RudyM
The CIA, the US war party and the ukie oligarchs.
Is McCainistan jewish, is Nuland jewish, is Killary jewish, is Brzezinski jewish ? These bastards play the Great game against Russia for decades, they don't give a shit about jewishness or zionism. They supported the maoists, they supported and still support the jihadists, they support the ukronazis. It's not about ideology nor religion, it's about geostrategy : isolate Russia, divide Eurasia and rule.

But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. “Weak” China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

Part of that irony must be the crowd that, by dint of knowledge no other part of the world but the West would have ever produced, means technology no-one else would have ever invented, strong of sets of ideas and a vision that no other culture would have ever imagined, has realized the West's inferiority.

And, via an electronic device that would have never existed (or maybe only some thousands years afterwards), through the technology of the Internet, they spread their wisdom.

You may say that without the West everybody would have been prevented from realizing how ugly the West were :) .

sociopathic social relations between men and women

This is the first time I see the psychological category of sociology applied to the relations between the two sexes.I am not saying I disagree, I am saying I struggle to apprehend what you do mean.In the evolutionary battle of life, males and females play the role of rivals. Obviously, submission of one side extinguishes conflict (for example in the most socially advanced countries of the West, the war of the sexes is currently paused: males have submitted themselves). Otherwise, there is fighting, by various means: I guess this is what you call sociopathy, but I am unsure.

Well, science and technology made us lose touch with what makes life satisfying. As life became progressively unhappy in industrial economies, we became suicidal and nihilistic. Hence, our “strength” turned out to be our undoing, in the end.

Conflict can be resolved on the basis of mutual interests in a fair and moral manner, and in fact is all the time. The inevitability of conflict does not mean you have to become a sociopath – use deceit and exploitation to dominate others. That’s a choice on how to respond to conflict, the PUA choice. Furthermore, just as there is conflict in relations between the sexes, there is also a great deal of shared interests and complementarity, that can serve as the basis for harmony. You can choose to ignore that if you wish.

“Evolutionary psychology” is more of a rationalization for certain modern thought trends than it is anything objectively scientific.

Beautiful piece, Mr. Shamir. How you manage to write reflectively and hopefully about tactical politics is a source of wonder.

Trump is also trying, as part of his cheerleading efforts in the fight for America's soul, to bring back God into the public consciousness. Not only in the inauguration, he will also finish brief speeches with "God bless America". I count that effort as important as his immigration/Russia stances.

He has that in common with his Russian counterpart. As Benedict XVI recently said of Putin: "I certainly believe he is --a man of power of course-- somehow affected by the necessity of faith. He is a realist. He sees how Russia suffers from the destruction of morality. Even as a patriot, as someone who wants Russia to have great power again, he sees that the destruction of Christianity threatens to destroy Russia. ... He has now even, as he gave the Papa (Pope Francis) an icon,made the sign of the cross and kissed it.."

Mr. Shamir, since you've written about Dreyfus, would you consider doing a piece about the French candidates? Fillon and Le Pen? Fillon comes from the Vendée, as you may know, Le Pen from... Le Pen. I'd be interested in your insights.

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back - on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet - who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said "Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!". I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can't wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming "mainstreamed" - Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you'd expect - and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations - instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. "Weak" China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

There is some unity in the natures of Greek, Roman and Western civilization, and it has endured for millennia.

Brilliant article, yet Trump dissed Jews when he nominated an Episcopalian to the Supreme Court! He would be the only Protestant, from my blog:

Oct 3, 2010 – No Protestants on the Supreme Court

I like to comment on interesting issues that never appear in our corporate media. Racial diversity is a major topic, but religious diversity is rarely mentioned. Our nation is 51% Protestant, 25% Catholic, 2% Mormon, 2% varied Christian sects, 2% Jewish, 1% Muslim, 2% others, and 15% of Americans identify themselves as non-religious or not affiliated. As of 1994, the Supreme Court had five Protestant justices, two Catholics, and two Jews. Over the years, retiring Protestant judges were replaced only with Catholics and Jews, so today the nine-member court consists of six Catholics and three Jews, without a single Protestant!

I doubt this is an evil conspiracy, but our media never mentions this, and with all the effort at diversity, one might think the Protestant majority should have at least one seat on the Supreme Court, or perhaps a proportional representation of five seats. One might think President Obama is more sensitive to diversity, yet he replaced the last two retiring Protestants with a Catholic and a Jew. One might think that national leaders realized: “Gee, this looks awkward.” Apparently, the corporate media agrees, so they ignore the issue. I don’t think this is a conspiracy since all were nominated by Protestant Presidents, but it’s undemocratic.
_______________

Fast forward to 2016 when much news was made about Obama’s Supreme Court nomination that was stalled by Republicans, but no one mentioned it was yet another Jew! I have no problem with Jewish people or Catholics and have many friends, but the lack of diversity on our Supreme Court is stunning, and never mentioned by our corporate media. Yet most Jews are now furious that Trump nominated a Protestant.

It would be interesting if genuine racial and religious diversity was enforced (on a %age basis) in anything to do with the government (including the Federal Reserve, Treasury and Supreme Court). Radical Jews would no doubt go from being the principal supporters of "diversity" to being its principal opponents.

It couldn't be clearer that "diversity" is just a tool to attack Anglo unity and consolidate Jewish minority power. From their point of view, the ideal result would seem to be absolute power, for example Bolshevik totalitarians organizing the destruction in 1931 of Moscow's historic Cathedral of Christ the Saviour with Kaganovich having himself photographed standing on the rubble.

Appreciate and share your sentiments. Just let's not call Barrack Hussein-Obama a "Protestant" president. He is no Christian and appears, in addition, to sympathize with and relate to Islam more respectfully and affectionately.

To be sure, our other recent presidents have been generally bad or amoral men pretending to be Christians and perhaps believing/rationalizing themselves to be in some general sense.

By contrast, Hussein-Obama is the first who might actually be an adherent of a religion that is both alien and fundamentally hostile to the West and Christians.

It has been written so many time about the "glass ceiling" as far how women not not 50% of CEOs since they are 50% of America. Similar comparison about blacks? But, never one article about 2% of America pulling more than 30% of the Supreme Court; 15 times their statistical share as citizens.

But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. “Weak” China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

Part of that irony must be the crowd that, by dint of knowledge no other part of the world but the West would have ever produced, means technology no-one else would have ever invented, strong of sets of ideas and a vision that no other culture would have ever imagined, has realized the West's inferiority.

And, via an electronic device that would have never existed (or maybe only some thousands years afterwards), through the technology of the Internet, they spread their wisdom.

You may say that without the West everybody would have been prevented from realizing how ugly the West were :) .

sociopathic social relations between men and women

This is the first time I see the psychological category of sociology applied to the relations between the two sexes.I am not saying I disagree, I am saying I struggle to apprehend what you do mean.In the evolutionary battle of life, males and females play the role of rivals. Obviously, submission of one side extinguishes conflict (for example in the most socially advanced countries of the West, the war of the sexes is currently paused: males have submitted themselves). Otherwise, there is fighting, by various means: I guess this is what you call sociopathy, but I am unsure.

You got it backwards: “through the technology of the Internet, they spread their wisdom.” The wisdom was there. And it was known universally. And then came technology of media that could perform mass brain washing on unprecedented scale. An the wisdom and knowledge was lost. For example the knowledge about Jews and Judaism. Look for 19 century and early 20 century books. You may still find it there. Mass media buried it. And internet is even worse.

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back - on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet - who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said "Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!". I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can't wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming "mainstreamed" - Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you'd expect - and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations - instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. "Weak" China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

You should’ve grabbed a hold of your friend and slapped the shit out of him!

“I’d suggest a simple explanation. Jews want to import Muslims to fight Christ and the Church.”

Maybe it’s the other way around. Even though Jews feign sympathy for Muslims(at least for those OVER HERE), Jews(at least those of Zionist persuasion) certainly don’t like Muslims in the Middle East(those OVER THERE).

So, if hostile Muslims are brought to the West and do harm to gentiles, then Europeans and Americans will hate Muslims and continue to support Israel(that is at war with Muslims). “We gentiles and you Jews have the common enemy: Muslims.”

Of course, if Americans and Europeans had sense & courage, they’d ask, “Why should we feel sympathy for Jews who are at war with nasty Muslims when it’s the Jews who’ve done most to bring murderous Muslims to the West and use them against us?”

But Worship of Jews is such a shibboleth of the West that such a question never crosses the mind of your average European or American dummy.

Because of media and academia brainwashing, three people are holy in the West: Jews, Negroes, and Homos.

So, Jews can pull all sorts of trick… but they will never be blamed.

Jews can accuse whites of being ‘nazis’ and support more immigration of Muslims into the West. But if Muslims commit violence, the first concern of whites is ‘we must save Jews from Muslims’.

Should have phrased my earlier reply a little differently, having re-read the article, Mr. Shamir is making an excellent analysis.

You, former Priss, make a very good point with

the Jews who’ve done most to bring murderous Muslims to the West and use them against us?

I read much of recent Western history, it is true that Jewish people are always at the centre of initial moves to 'multiculalism', after they have infiltrated the propaganda throughout education, then government, then the law they can dissemble and say 'Aw, it's not us doing it.' So you are correct.

Mr. Shamir has a very important point in that it is anti-Christian as a core motivation, makes several others that are very pertinent.

On a lighter note, I offer a true anecdote from abt. 15 years ago. Our government had been lax in allowing Israelis to run illegal businesses and do illegal work until about two years earlier, but there were still many around.

In the semi-rural (not so much now, but there are still a few farms within 15 min. walk of the station, five min. at the time) exurb. of Tokyo, suddenly I see, for a few weeks, posters asking us to support a Holycaust museum in the area. I thought 'What is this nonsense?'

A nearby research centre (my workplace at times) did some Pacific War weapons work.

Fortunately, the government's newly healthy attitude to their doing illegal work and running illegal businesses meant they were closed down, so the stupid museum never was built.

At least one of the operators married a daughter of the prefectural police chief, I don't know what happened to him, but, if not divorced, operating between the police and yakuza (not entirely separate, depending on the place).

Perhaps, with his own racket of Israeli illegals blown, he divorced and went to another place.

I think Trump’s Zionism is genuine. It is an interesting thought that a Jewish cabal is trying to have a global scale version of the clean break strategy (like the Syria war) where all the world powers drain themselves and destroy themselves. I think even ethnic nationalist want to see themselves as a “good person” and supporting bringing Muslims into the US is a symptom of that narcissism (protect the false image). Trump harms the false image of the American Empire and that is the source of the wraith in my opinion.

Wonderful article Shamir is absolutely right. Muslim immigration is a Jewish plan to destroy the Christian lands of Europe and the Americas.
I’ve spent my life among Jews and they truly hate Christianity whether Protestant or Catholic. Their mantra is “we are living saints who never did anything in 5,000 years that was not totally moral and virtuous.
And they consider some version of Hitler.
I don’t talk to them much so I don’t know what they think of Trumps numerous Jewish relatives

I don’t talk to them but they talk to me, constantly.basically is a combination of face lifts, $400.00 haircuts, shopping at Bloomingdales and the latest liberal propaganda poured into their empty heads by Jew propaganda central.

But Jews are not the only ones. Monday was world hijab day and hundreds of Canadian and European woman elected and appointed officials wore hijab a to express solidarity with Muslim women

Jews were always city dwellers in America They used the blacks to destroy NYC, Los Angeles, Chicago, St Louis, Boston, city after city that were Jewish strongholds

But their hatred of the Christians who lived in those cities was so strong that they went ahead and destroyed the Jewish as well as the Christian neighborhoods

A Jew who was in the weather underground once told me that every bite of food my children ate was stolen from a third world child.

They truly hate us. But unfortunately we don’t hate them so we are helpless cats and they are hungry coyotes.

Operation Chaos: Opération Miscegenation: Divide/Pollute/Predate from within, It's a form of agriculture. The f'n Eloi always winds up invited for dinner by the Morlocks!
(H.G. Wells)

Apparently, the people who instigated the Middle Eastern wars wanted to create a wave of refugees into Europe and North America in order to bring more colour and diversity to these poor monochrome lands.

[… there will be no natives, just so many persons from all over the world, celebrating Kumbaya.

The Jews will be able to get and keep their privileged positions in Europe as they do in the US.

It will be good to be M O T ( a member of the Tribe) in those times.

This also is key:

They won’t be alone: by their success, they will establish a pattern to copycat for whoever wants to succeed in the new world, and masses of imitation-Jews will support the policies of real Jews.

masses of imitation-Jews

This is already way into fruition, with the obvious fact of Askenazi inclusion to the equation. Or even Neocon transitionals. Not just about religion, not just about race, but all about ID. Funny how it's usually the not too pure that draw the lines of exclusion so tight.

Was this part of the phenomena that inspired the French writer DeToqueville to predict a class would emerge in a naive "American Democracy" that would eventually abscond with the loot by self dealing out of the Treasury!

Well, George Washington virtuously refused a salary when he took the job of commander in chief of the revolutionary army.
He asked only his expenses. A year later his expenses came to $400,000 in 1776 money. Congress paid it off, grudgingly And quickly put him on a straight salary of around $50,000.

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back - on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet - who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said "Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!". I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can't wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming "mainstreamed" - Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you'd expect - and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations - instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. "Weak" China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

Jews no longer call it just the holocaust Its now the European holocaust and every country in Europecwas implicated, even the countries that fought the Germans and neutral countries. Probably the Azores, Iceland and Malta as well.
And of course The Pope directed the holocaust from his fortress in the Vatican.

They hate Europe because the Europeans managed to control them until the 19th century and they despise America because we have been so good to them.

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back - on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet - who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said "Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!". I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can't wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming "mainstreamed" - Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you'd expect - and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations - instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. "Weak" China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

I can vouch for that!

Right here, on UR, I was told something similar, i.e., that there was no point in Giraldi’s piece, “Taking Down” British Officials” examining “how the Israeli Embassy in London connived with government officials to “take down” parliamentarians and government ministers …” because everyone does it. It should be expected behavior, obligatory, even.

I replied that if that’s how the game is played, then I expect to hear no more whining about “The” holocaust because, well, what would you expect? Shit happens, so perhaps we should just forget about it.

A couple of the mouthy punks had piled on me, but I haven’t heard from either one since.

I think its useful to understand the source of Jewish strength and European weakness.

Jews operate from a standpoint of "certainty" - Europeans from a position of "questioning". The Jew knows exactly "who" he is and pursues clear materialistic goals - the European puts his faith in a process of "discovery". He has a fluid identity.

For Jews, factionalism is at the core of life - a people that "dwells apart" - life is a war between factions, and survival is the goal.

This is an immensely strong position from which to conduct one's life - a firm foundation, a clear path, unquestioned assumptions - all that's left is the implementation, tactics, strategies. Your strength is not diverted by futile questions of identity or ultimate ends.

The European approach to life leads to world changing discovery, science, and technology, while the Jewish approach is a fantastic starting point from which to acquire power and wealth.

However "noble" the European approach may be, it makes one vulnerable to people whose goals aren't similarly "high minded". Stargazing may be a fine and noble activity, but the thief can steal in and leave with the furniture.

To some extent, this sketch characterizes Europeans peculiar vulnerability to Asians and Muslims as well, people who know who they are and have clear goals.

The dilemna facing Europeans is acute - to cease being vulnerable, Europeans must end their peculiar project of fluid discovery as a way of life and acquire a clear and stable identity, but doing so would end the peculiar European ability to invent new technologies. In other words, to grow stronger Europeans would have to grow weaker. A paradox few are willing to face. Europeans would have to become a "normal" people, but are secretly proud of their exceptionalism.

In the end Jews are trapped in their own mind systems, and are as much victims of it as they are victimizers of others. Jews live Hobbesian, animalistic lives, and are obsessed with issues of personal adequacy and ego. Not fun.

Who's calling the shots? Who wields most of the power while neo-nazis do the grunt work? Who sponsors Right Sector? Who promoted Femen's anti-Yanukovych antics?

@ RudyM
The CIA, the US war party and the ukie oligarchs.
Is McCainistan jewish, is Nuland jewish, is Killary jewish, is Brzezinski jewish ? These bastards play the Great game against Russia for decades, they don’t give a shit about jewishness or zionism. They supported the maoists, they supported and still support the jihadists, they support the ukronazis. It’s not about ideology nor religion, it’s about geostrategy : isolate Russia, divide Eurasia and rule.

Victoria Nuland is, in fact, Jewish. So is George Soros, who financed the Femen and was involved in financing the insurgents who overthrew the Ukrainian regime. And also is apparently financing some of the blackshirt thugs who attack peaceful rightists these days.

That's not to say everything is one big Jewish conspiracy, or that all Jews are enemies. But to discount the Jewish radical tradition in this country, and especially the back-story of the Neo-Trots, is to overlook a huge factor in the explosion of imperialism and attacks against freedom in America in the last few decades.

He should stop bumping the closed door. Forget the embassy move, forget pussyfooting with other Zionist dreams, and first of all, forget attacking Iran. If the Zionists would deliver Trump the wholehearted support of their American brethren, it would make some (not much) sense; but in the existing circumstances, none whatsoever.

For a man in political life Mr Unz has a lot of courage (as indeed has Mr Shamir) but I worry for them.

For all Their power it is amazing to me that “The Elders” have not yet succeeded in shutting down websites like this one – indeed they appear to be proliferating as more and more people catch on to what is happening to us and invocation of “The Holocaust” and the accusation “Antisemite!” gradually lose currency in the face of undeniable evidence.

trump will never fix anything with all the jews he has on board with him. the left wing jews job is to destroy and genocide white Christians the right wing jews job is to have USA fight 1000 year war for Israel. it is like the good cop bad cop con. then both the left and right jews team up for Israel. another angle Shamir did not include is when flooded with all these muslims it will produce constant friction between Christians and muslims and after terror attacks US and Europe would be inclined to keep bombing arab countries. satanyahu is now on a world tour to convince the west to take out iran

This court case about Trump’s order is absurd.
Judges want “evidence” about the terrorist activities of the 7 affected countries.
It would be as if the day before D-Day, judges wanted evidence whether it was a good tactical idea or not.
The foreign policy of US is being run by an unelected District Court judge in Seattle?!
Jurisprudence and the judiciary in this country are moribund.
Even Dershowitz says Trump can just ignore the stay.
Coequal branches.
Maybe now is the time to have this fight, though Trump has a lot on his plate .

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back - on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet - who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said "Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!". I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can't wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming "mainstreamed" - Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you'd expect - and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations - instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. "Weak" China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn:
“For a Jew, nothing is more insulting than the truth.”

Brilliant article, yet Trump dissed Jews when he nominated an Episcopalian to the Supreme Court! He would be the only Protestant, from my blog:

Oct 3, 2010 - No Protestants on the Supreme Court

I like to comment on interesting issues that never appear in our corporate media. Racial diversity is a major topic, but religious diversity is rarely mentioned. Our nation is 51% Protestant, 25% Catholic, 2% Mormon, 2% varied Christian sects, 2% Jewish, 1% Muslim, 2% others, and 15% of Americans identify themselves as non-religious or not affiliated. As of 1994, the Supreme Court had five Protestant justices, two Catholics, and two Jews. Over the years, retiring Protestant judges were replaced only with Catholics and Jews, so today the nine-member court consists of six Catholics and three Jews, without a single Protestant!

I doubt this is an evil conspiracy, but our media never mentions this, and with all the effort at diversity, one might think the Protestant majority should have at least one seat on the Supreme Court, or perhaps a proportional representation of five seats. One might think President Obama is more sensitive to diversity, yet he replaced the last two retiring Protestants with a Catholic and a Jew. One might think that national leaders realized: "Gee, this looks awkward." Apparently, the corporate media agrees, so they ignore the issue. I don't think this is a conspiracy since all were nominated by Protestant Presidents, but it's undemocratic.
_______________

Fast forward to 2016 when much news was made about Obama's Supreme Court nomination that was stalled by Republicans, but no one mentioned it was yet another Jew! I have no problem with Jewish people or Catholics and have many friends, but the lack of diversity on our Supreme Court is stunning, and never mentioned by our corporate media. Yet most Jews are now furious that Trump nominated a Protestant.

It would be interesting if genuine racial and religious diversity was enforced (on a %age basis) in anything to do with the government (including the Federal Reserve, Treasury and Supreme Court). Radical Jews would no doubt go from being the principal supporters of “diversity” to being its principal opponents.

It couldn’t be clearer that “diversity” is just a tool to attack Anglo unity and consolidate Jewish minority power. From their point of view, the ideal result would seem to be absolute power, for example Bolshevik totalitarians organizing the destruction in 1931 of Moscow’s historic Cathedral of Christ the Saviour with Kaganovich having himself photographed standing on the rubble.

Shamir,
I get that you’re a Trump/Bannon fan and have gone to great lengths to not shed too much light on Trump’s family support for and to Israel that spans back 50 years but do you not think that mentioning more about his long history of support for ZIonism should be mentioned? Who cares that it doesn’t serve your point to mention these things? I have read many of your books and I love them but uncritical support for anyone is not what I expected from you. Maybe write an article about Bannon’s championing of the Judaic-Christian myth and how this disqualifies Trump from being the sort of Christian savior you enjoy describing him as. Instead you’re taking a page out of Bannon’s book by lightly suggesting that these immigrants are coming to America with a hatred of Christians in mind. More likely that the majority of these immigrants hate the ISIS version of Islam more than Christians who many of these refugees have lived with before coming here. Most refugees I have encountered are very clear that the true enemy is the Israeli/Saudi/Zionist cancer in the middle east and they rightfully blame them for their displacement. Jews want these Muslim victims of Zionism in America so they can cast their justified anti-Israelism as anti-American and effectively stop the rising tide of American anti-Israelism. You’re playing a dangerous game by turning a blind eye to realities that you see in Trump that you do not want to acknowledge because it doesn’t serve your point.

Trump Family Has 50-Year History of Donating to Jewish, Israeli Causes

This whole line of reasoning aka “The Jews are still ungrateful and bite the hand that feeds them!” presupposes that there is, indeed, some sort of universal solidarity, conspiracy and/or hivemind among them. Oh, c’mon – be realistic! We are talking about the people who sold Joseph into slavery (or so one Book claims). That there will be a consensus between Zionists and cosmopolites? Pfft! Like hell it will.

There are two (2) ways of the nation to survive – collectivist (as the nation-state) or individualist. In the first one the People unites together to repulse all would be enemies and builds the common future for themselves with the interests of the collective (the People and the Country) outweighing the interest of any single individual. Yes, part of the People will die while defending against the enemy – that’s the reality of War. The second way presupposes the sacristy of the Individual Person and its life, so the territory, the country is deemed absolutely irrelevant and thus given up to the enemy. The People then survive as the collection of individuals – or as the Diaspora. Is it little wonder that thanks to the second tactic the Jews survived as the people and now, mostly, support liberal approach in everywhere be it the government or the culture? What does really either US or Israel mean for an Individual Person? Nothing. Just a piece of clay. Yay, cosmopolitism, patriotism-bashing and jobs outsourcing! What-what-what?! To sacrifice something for the interests of the Society and/or the State? To serve in the Army?! Now, this is simply not kosher!

And, the best part, you don’t need to be a Jew to think this way!

Iran is the odd one in the Magnificent Seven. It has not been invaded, has not been bombed, just threatened with invasion and bombardment for many years since President Carter.

It only dared to suppress Glorious Twitter Revolution ™. Now local “dissidents” are screwed. Oh, Ahmadinejad, you BEAST!

The Church was an enemy of moneylenders; interest has been forbidden by the church, but it was used by Jews to accumulate their vast capital to be used against the Church.

Absolutely true. I recommend everyone to familiarize themselves with the works of St. Bonaventura, who wrote that the Usury is a special kind of Mortal Sins. Murderer, Adulterer or Glutton just physically is incapable of committing their Sin 24/7 non-stop. The only one PERMANENT Sin, commited non-stop, no matter what the weather or conditions of the Sinner, is the Sin of Usury. Whether awake or asleep he Sins as the percents of the debt of the unfortunates who had to deal with him increase every moment. Human was commanded to earn his daily bread in sweat and toil – the Usurer had no need for this. Faithful are commanded to abstain from work and sin on Holy Days – but the Usurer “works” and sins constantly. The Usurer exploits Time itself, a gift given for free to all the Humanity by God. This is the ultimate perversion, the trade in Time itself, and, thus, all Usurers should be denied the Salvation for Eternity.

Thus wrote St. Bonaventura in XIII century. After II Lateran the Catholic Church “relaxed” its attitude towards Usury, i.e. the banking. The Protestantism had been built and supported the capitalism from the get go. Only the Orthodox Church at least in doctrinal sense resists this “trend” so far.

Why do Jews support the Muslim migration of from Middle East to western countries?

Jews try to save Israel whose possibilities of survival in a hostile Arab surrounding are not looking too good. The Arab country with the best economic development in the last thirty years, thus becoming more and more a danger to Israel in its neighborhood, was Syria. Israelis had an enormous interest to destroy it. That is why Israel is strongly supporting the ongoing war of the West against Syria.

During the cold war, the immigration of dissidents from the eastern block into western Europe helped to destroy the communist block. It was often the best and brightest who decided to leave their homes in the eastern block thus weakening this block. The West is now using the same system against the Arabs. They try to weaken Syria using the same instruments they used against the communists, that is the Geneva Refugee Convention and the UNHCR. Jews support this policy because it strengthens the position of Israel in the Middle East. The people they want to convince to leave Syria are the gifted students, the entrepreneurs, the excellent doctors and teachers of Syria. Only if great numbers of Arabs, be they Christians or Muslims or of any other belief, leave the Middle East, Israel can survive.

During the cold war, the immigration of dissidents from the eastern block into western Europe helped to destroy the communist block. It was often the best and brightest who decided to leave their homes in the eastern block thus weakening this block.

Lol, nope. It were either the Jews or dissidents. And, frankly, the USSR lost little to non “brainpower” by kicking SoLZHEnytsin out.

Brilliant article, yet Trump dissed Jews when he nominated an Episcopalian to the Supreme Court! He would be the only Protestant, from my blog:

Oct 3, 2010 - No Protestants on the Supreme Court

I like to comment on interesting issues that never appear in our corporate media. Racial diversity is a major topic, but religious diversity is rarely mentioned. Our nation is 51% Protestant, 25% Catholic, 2% Mormon, 2% varied Christian sects, 2% Jewish, 1% Muslim, 2% others, and 15% of Americans identify themselves as non-religious or not affiliated. As of 1994, the Supreme Court had five Protestant justices, two Catholics, and two Jews. Over the years, retiring Protestant judges were replaced only with Catholics and Jews, so today the nine-member court consists of six Catholics and three Jews, without a single Protestant!

I doubt this is an evil conspiracy, but our media never mentions this, and with all the effort at diversity, one might think the Protestant majority should have at least one seat on the Supreme Court, or perhaps a proportional representation of five seats. One might think President Obama is more sensitive to diversity, yet he replaced the last two retiring Protestants with a Catholic and a Jew. One might think that national leaders realized: "Gee, this looks awkward." Apparently, the corporate media agrees, so they ignore the issue. I don't think this is a conspiracy since all were nominated by Protestant Presidents, but it's undemocratic.
_______________

Fast forward to 2016 when much news was made about Obama's Supreme Court nomination that was stalled by Republicans, but no one mentioned it was yet another Jew! I have no problem with Jewish people or Catholics and have many friends, but the lack of diversity on our Supreme Court is stunning, and never mentioned by our corporate media. Yet most Jews are now furious that Trump nominated a Protestant.

Carlton Meyer:

For readers’ information, nominee Gorsuch was raised Catholic and became Church of England (our Episcopalian church) while studying in England. His brother remains a Roman Catholic.

Shamir, I get that you're a Trump/Bannon fan and have gone to great lengths to not shed too much light on Trump's family support for and to Israel that spans back 50 years but do you not think that mentioning more about his long history of support for ZIonism should be mentioned? Who cares that it doesn't serve your point to mention these things? I have read many of your books and I love them but uncritical support for anyone is not what I expected from you. Maybe write an article about Bannon's championing of the Judaic-Christian myth and how this disqualifies Trump from being the sort of Christian savior you enjoy describing him as. Instead you're taking a page out of Bannon's book by lightly suggesting that these immigrants are coming to America with a hatred of Christians in mind. More likely that the majority of these immigrants hate the ISIS version of Islam more than Christians who many of these refugees have lived with before coming here. Most refugees I have encountered are very clear that the true enemy is the Israeli/Saudi/Zionist cancer in the middle east and they rightfully blame them for their displacement. Jews want these Muslim victims of Zionism in America so they can cast their justified anti-Israelism as anti-American and effectively stop the rising tide of American anti-Israelism. You're playing a dangerous game by turning a blind eye to realities that you see in Trump that you do not want to acknowledge because it doesn't serve your point.

Trump Family Has 50-Year History of Donating to Jewish, Israeli Causeshttps://www.breakingisraelnews.com/78896/trump-family-50-year-history-donating-jewish-israeli-causes/#TeHCAczMjsCTOJ9E.97

Jared Kushner -Trump’s Court Jewhttp://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1179

Trump's Not Our Guy. It's Time to Stop Pretending Otherwise.http://therightstuff.biz/2016/04/25/trumps-not-our-guy-its-time-to-stop-pretending-otherwise/

Two lousy candidates to choose from and I actually was leaning towards Trump until I heard his speech to AIPAC and started to look more into his background. Did that make me pro-Hillary, nope, still hated her just as much and she is even more beholden to AIPAC and the Neocon establishment. With her, war was a given and I think she would be more dangerous because she could successfully carry forward the status quo for another 4 to 8 years. With Trump, at least there was the chance of an anti-establishment coup plus if anything else, he would help speed up the process of the inevitable crumbling of the status quo, although unintentionally and through blunder.

Are you sure there is no confirmation bias in your fine piece? In other words, does one not here, fall into the trap of discarding all data which stand contrary to one’s deeply held preconceptions? Is this not predictable fodder for well-known biases?

Jews are not a monolithic bloc, even on the question of Israel’s immigration laws [more on this in due course].

First, Israel – Ha’Aretz – was conceived as the solitary Jewish majority nation for reasons of providing sanctuary. You, my friend, view the world through the lens of a rare chameleon; one which changed religious shades with an ease such as its inner purposes had swung and guided. I shan’t comment on them except to remark that it allows you to shift between a conflation of Zionism with Judaism, and then blithely separate Orthodoxy from Liberal Jewish views: a feat which some might ascribe to the inescapable genes .

On Israel’s immigration laws it needs to be noted that while Jews are welcome to obtain citizenship, Aliya or actual establishment of residency is required.

Numbers, as I often remark, are of the essence. Jews and Muslims share a mixed history, one which largely speaks to a harmonious Jewish experience under Muslim rule. One more observation: you introduced the notion of a Protestant cooperation, even supplication, to Jewish mind rays against Catholics. It’s a convenient story which disregards the manifest philosophical accord between the Evangelical churches and Israel; and that is not a value-laden statement, merely a factual observation.

Jews are instinctively tolerant of diversity; that much is true for obvious reasons: a small group of travellers cannot be otherwise. It taught them the value of working with inspired peoples of many nations even as that experience on occasion met with violence: shoulders shrugged and feet moved on.

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration – here are the little beasts:

Race / Ethnicity Number Percentage of Israel population
Israelis 8,585,000 100.0 %
Jews. 6,419,000 74.8 %
Arab 1,786,000 20.8%
Others (including family members of Jewish immigrants who are not registered at the Ministry of Interior as Jews, non-Arab Christians, non-Arab Muslims and residents who do not have an ethnic or religious classification)
380,000 4.4%

Europe

Pan and Pfeil (2004) count 87 distinct "peoples of Europe", of which 33 form the majority population in at least one sovereign state, while the remaining 54 constitute ethnic minorities. The total number of national minority populations in Europe is estimated at 105 million people, or 14% of 770 million Europeans. (including Europeans in Asian Russia)
The largest ethnic groups are the Russians, of whom 92 million reside in Europe, the Germans, with 72 million. In some countries such as the United Kingdom, France and Spain, the designation of nationality may controversially take on ethnicaspects, subsuming smaller ethnic groups such as Welsh, Bretons and Basques, making it difficult to quantify a "British" or "French" ethnicity, for example.
Approximately 20 million non-Europeans live in the EU, 4% of the overall population.

Russia

The Russian Federation is home to as many as 160 different ethnic groups and indigenous peoples. As of the 2010 census, 80.90% of the population that disclosed their ethnicity (111,016,896 people) is ethnically Russian, followed by (groups larger than one million):
 3.87% Tatars (5,310,649)
 1.40% Ukrainians (1,927,988)
 1.15% Bashkirs (1,584,554)
 1.05% Chuvashs (1,435,872)
 1.04% Chechens (1,431,360)
 0.86% Armenians (1,182,388)

That's definitely the case when it comes to the host countries the happen to live in, but I f the Zionists could get their wish and expel the remaining Palestinians, Israel would be virtually 100% Jewish.

One more observation: you introduced the notion of a Protestant cooperation, even supplication, to Jewish mind rays against Catholics.

That mind ray machine has been replaced by a new and better model at least seven times. The Russian immigrant scientists have been instrumental in this. Catholics are a side show what with their current moonbat, pro-Muslim, communist Pope. So the mind ray machines in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem are focused on the brains (such as the are) of Muslim leaders in the Middle East and the smelly ayatollahs in Iran.

Sam, there is one confusion in your presentation: you do not distinguish native and imported Muslims. In Russia or Palestine, or India, Muslims are natives. Hundred years ago, in what today is Israel, Muslims were 90 p.c. So it has no connection to the Muslim immigration. Jews expelled hundreds of thousands Muslims and Christians from their homes. And they did not allow any back, let alone allowing any Muslim immigration. Do you understand the difference?

“I’d suggest a simple explanation. Jews want to import Muslims to fight Christ and the Church.”

I would say that is not an effective way. If violent Muslims come to the West and attack Christians, it will only strengthen Christianity. Now, it might be useful in a divide-and-rule away: Make goy fight goy.

Anyway, the most effective weapon against Christianity has been spiritual appropriation: Enemies of Christianity appropriating Christianity for their own agenda. It is in contrast to the old way of iconoclasm.
When communists smashed 10,000s of churches, they nearly wiped out Christianity but also lent Christianity the glow of martyrdom. So, the Russian Church survived and even gained moral legitimacy. Prior to the Revolution, it was seen as a partner of repressive Tsarism. But after the Revolution, it came to symbolize the survival of Russian culture and spirit through the cold winter of communism.
And look how the Catholic Church played a significant role in Poland because it was seen as a patriotic sanctuary from communism(associated with the dreaded Russians).

Christianity thrives on persecution. After all, it is founded on the myth of Jesus’s Crucifixion and generations grew up hearing about how Nero fed Christians to the lions.

So, what is the most effective way to destroy Christianity? There are Negromania and hedonism because they addict young ones to culture of instant gratification.
Another is New Age flakery that offers some pseudo-spiritual pablum, the feely-good stuff without the so-called ‘judgementalism’. That way, you can be a slob and cretin but still feel the aura of holiness via charlatans like Oprah and Chopra. Inane and ‘inoffensive’, a kind of something-for-everyone that makes everyone so warm and huggy-wuggy.

Another way is to penetrate Christianity and rewrite its genetic code. Viruses do this. They sneak into cells instead of attacking them head on. They enter into the nuclei and start messing up stuff, even leading to mutations of genetic code. Since the Core of Christianity is anti-homo, anti-degeneracy, and anti-hedonistic, the Body of Christianity waged a war on decadence. So, the trick was to send agents into the very core of Christianity and rewrite its meanings. It would lead to spiritual appropriation. And the churches made this easy for their enemies. Due to Catholic Church’s rules on priesthood and celibacy, most healthy men found Catholic priesthood abhorrent. The result was a bunch of homos taking over as secret agents. And Mainline churches became so soulless and gutless that they failed to inspire people, and so, a bunch of lesbians took over as agents. Once they got into the core of Christian Institutions via their Long March into the church, they changed its DNA so that the new gospel was Jesus is for homos and trannies.

This is why the Pussy Riot was the stupid ineffective way. Its nasty antics of defilement made many Russians sympathize with the Church.
The more effective way to desecrate the church is to change its DNA from within. To do this, you must feign piousness and faith in Christ. Then, you study theology, gain accreditation, and enter as a clergymen and gradually climb up the ranks. Once you get to the top, you change the core meaning of Christianity.
It’s like TERMINATOR 2. How did the enemy of humans become a friend of humans and enemy of other machines? Humans reprogrammed its mecha ‘DNA’.

Same with American Laws. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that would allow ‘gay marriage’. But America’s Rule of Law can be used to undermine Rule of Law. And Jewish lawyers and judges like Ruth Baird Ginsburg and Elena Kagan did just this. They worked up the legal system, became supreme court justices, and disregarded the Constitution and legalized ‘gay marriage’. Since the Constitution says the Supreme Court has the final say on legal matters, Jewish Power could get away with this abomination.

If violent Muslims come to the West and attack Christians, it will only strengthen Christianity

Christianity is already effectively dead. You can't strengthen a corpse. The West is well and truly post-Christian. Europeans and Americans don't care if Christianity is persecuted because Christianity is irrelevant to them.

The things that are relevant to modern Europeans and Americans are the really important things, the core values of our civilisation - shopping, virtue-signalling and porn.

"Another is New Age flakery that offers some pseudo-spiritual pablum, the feely-good stuff without the so-called ‘judgementalism’. That way, you can be a slob and cretin but still feel the aura of holiness via charlatans like Oprah and Chopra. Inane and ‘inoffensive’, a kind of something-for-everyone that makes everyone so warm and huggy-wuggy."

Thank you for this absolutely spot on description of "new ageism" nonsense. It would be a pestilence if wasn't just so pathetic.

Good takes all, Priss. Most effective also was the absolute washing away of any public displays of Christianity. From schools, the Ten Commandments, crosses, nativity scenes, all gone. Making the very mention of "Merry Christmas" blasphemy against the "State" was pretty good, too. Plays at school with any notions whatsoever of Christianity, all gone. But every Muslim symbol there is? All good.

I'm surprised however that Jewish worship, synagogues, bar mitzvah and the associated parties and large gatherings of Jews aren't under attack here. Somehow, Jews in the U.S. seem to live under a cloak even though they are hugely over-represented in every facet of life in the U.S.. They seem to get no credit here for Israel's excesses against Muslims over there.

I'm not rooting for that, understand, but it seems as if there's an informal quid pro quo.

Are you sure there is no confirmation bias in your fine piece? In other words, does one not here, fall into the trap of discarding all data which stand contrary to one's deeply held preconceptions? Is this not predictable fodder for well-known biases?

Jews are not a monolithic bloc, even on the question of Israel's immigration laws [more on this in due course].

First, Israel - Ha'Aretz - was conceived as the solitary Jewish majority nation for reasons of providing sanctuary. You, my friend, view the world through the lens of a rare chameleon; one which changed religious shades with an ease such as its inner purposes had swung and guided. I shan’t comment on them except to remark that it allows you to shift between a conflation of Zionism with Judaism, and then blithely separate Orthodoxy from Liberal Jewish views: a feat which some might ascribe to the inescapable genes ;-) .

On Israel’s immigration laws it needs to be noted that while Jews are welcome to obtain citizenship, Aliya or actual establishment of residency is required.

Numbers, as I often remark, are of the essence. Jews and Muslims share a mixed history, one which largely speaks to a harmonious Jewish experience under Muslim rule. One more observation: you introduced the notion of a Protestant cooperation, even supplication, to Jewish mind rays against Catholics. It’s a convenient story which disregards the manifest philosophical accord between the Evangelical churches and Israel; and that is not a value-laden statement, merely a factual observation.

Jews are instinctively tolerant of diversity; that much is true for obvious reasons: a small group of travellers cannot be otherwise. It taught them the value of working with inspired peoples of many nations even as that experience on occasion met with violence: shoulders shrugged and feet moved on.

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration - here are the little beasts:

“ATTENTION MUSLIMS, ARABS AND OTHER ‘ANTI-ZIONIST’ CAMPUS TROLLS: Your names, image, friends list, postings, family member id’s and other personal info. will be submitted — in conjunction with other collected data sets — and sent to the following Federal Agencies…”

The email also threatens to “crush” SJP chapters and BDS supporters at Rutgers University, Vassar College, UCLA, and the California State University system, in addition to Black Lives Matter and LGBT groups that support Palestinian rights. The message concludes: “By the Sword of David, we will smash your collective skulls together online, and shatter your futures to pieces. And, Muzz/Arabs; It’ll be a Family Affair for you. That is a promise you may wish to meditate upon before ruining your family’s lives.”

This shows the lunacy of the concept of the terrorism If this is not terrorism then what terrorism is . Why the NYPD is silent? May be those mainataining silence will call this expression of hate and targeted violence as an expression of freedom of speech .

Migration is definitely not the lifeblood of America.
We have seen migrants destroy this country from within, not paying taxes, living off the dole and generally taking not giving back to the country that reluctantly welcomes them.

So what you are saying without actually saying it is HC would have been better, which is insane, period.

Authenticjazzman "Mensa" society member of forty-plus years and pro jazz artist.

Two lousy candidates to choose from and I actually was leaning towards Trump until I heard his speech to AIPAC and started to look more into his background. Did that make me pro-Hillary, nope, still hated her just as much and she is even more beholden to AIPAC and the Neocon establishment. With her, war was a given and I think she would be more dangerous because she could successfully carry forward the status quo for another 4 to 8 years. With Trump, at least there was the chance of an anti-establishment coup plus if anything else, he would help speed up the process of the inevitable crumbling of the status quo, although unintentionally and through blunder.

If you "think she would be more dangerous" then you must be at least marginally relieved that Trump won.

Trump is a gift. If you like him, you're happy. If you don't, he's responsible for activating citizen involvement. Much of this 'resistance' may be misguided, but at least people woke up. If Hillary had won, there would be NOTHING like this, even if she'd gone straight to invading Syria.

Trump has properly identified the enemy: the Fakestream Media. He may have his own reality, but that doesn't make the FSM any less fake.

The Fakestream Media is grinding the fake news memes into our brains. They repeat as fact that Putin invaded Ukraine, Assad used chemical weapons, Trump is a Russian puppet, etc., etc. Hillary couldn't/wouldn't chastise the Fakestream like Trump. And the SNL parody was hilarious, but Sean Spicer is a gem.

Ron Unz wrote about breaking the FSM last year:

Groups advocating policies opposed by the American establishment should recognize that the greatest obstacle they face is usually the mainstream media.
The Media Should Be Made a Primary Targethttp://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-breaching-the-media-barrier/

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back - on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet - who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said "Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!". I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can't wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming "mainstreamed" - Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you'd expect - and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations - instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. "Weak" China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

After such a plain expression of jew subversion why would you shudder?

There are many interesting thoughts here. Certainly, the hypocrisy of Jews screaming about Donald Trump’s move to limit the immigration of people from countries where hatred of the United States is endemic, while ignoring Israel’s brutal and unashamedly biased border policy, should be noted.

I would however like to suggest that one reason that so many American Jews want unlimited immigration, is the same reason that so many American non-Jews want it: because of the bias effect of all those wealthy oligarchs (Jewish and non-Jewish alike) that want mass immigration simply because it will drive wages for the many down and profits for the few up. Most American Jews will not profit from lower wages, just as most American Democrats and ‘liberals’ will not. But the oligarchs want it, and the oligarchs have influence, and most people march along with the herd… Because screaming that Trump is Hitler is easy, and the opposite can cost you your career and friends etc.

“Follow the Money” is often good advice.

As the proud citizen of a nation that was founded on a conspiracy, I do not a priori dismiss any claims of conspiracy, but this seems a bit too cute and convoluted. If a critical mass of the population becomes muslim, hostility to Jews will become endemic, and a voting bloc that might even neuter the mighty Israel lobby. Let’s see how Israel does when the United States is no longer a devoted ally and sugar daddy.

Fiendish plot aimed at world domination? Or stupid actions generated by unthinking greed for easy money now? IMHO the latter possibility is often the more likely…

Are you sure there is no confirmation bias in your fine piece? In other words, does one not here, fall into the trap of discarding all data which stand contrary to one's deeply held preconceptions? Is this not predictable fodder for well-known biases?

Jews are not a monolithic bloc, even on the question of Israel's immigration laws [more on this in due course].

First, Israel - Ha'Aretz - was conceived as the solitary Jewish majority nation for reasons of providing sanctuary. You, my friend, view the world through the lens of a rare chameleon; one which changed religious shades with an ease such as its inner purposes had swung and guided. I shan’t comment on them except to remark that it allows you to shift between a conflation of Zionism with Judaism, and then blithely separate Orthodoxy from Liberal Jewish views: a feat which some might ascribe to the inescapable genes ;-) .

On Israel’s immigration laws it needs to be noted that while Jews are welcome to obtain citizenship, Aliya or actual establishment of residency is required.

Numbers, as I often remark, are of the essence. Jews and Muslims share a mixed history, one which largely speaks to a harmonious Jewish experience under Muslim rule. One more observation: you introduced the notion of a Protestant cooperation, even supplication, to Jewish mind rays against Catholics. It’s a convenient story which disregards the manifest philosophical accord between the Evangelical churches and Israel; and that is not a value-laden statement, merely a factual observation.

Jews are instinctively tolerant of diversity; that much is true for obvious reasons: a small group of travellers cannot be otherwise. It taught them the value of working with inspired peoples of many nations even as that experience on occasion met with violence: shoulders shrugged and feet moved on.

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration - here are the little beasts:

Race / Ethnicity Number Percentage of Israel population
Israelis 8,585,000 100.0 %
Jews. 6,419,000 74.8 %
Arab 1,786,000 20.8%
Others (including family members of Jewish immigrants who are not registered at the Ministry of Interior as Jews, non-Arab Christians, non-Arab Muslims and residents who do not have an ethnic or religious classification)
380,000 4.4%

Europe

Pan and Pfeil (2004) count 87 distinct “peoples of Europe”, of which 33 form the majority population in at least one sovereign state, while the remaining 54 constitute ethnic minorities. The total number of national minority populations in Europe is estimated at 105 million people, or 14% of 770 million Europeans. (including Europeans in Asian Russia)
The largest ethnic groups are the Russians, of whom 92 million reside in Europe, the Germans, with 72 million. In some countries such as the United Kingdom, France and Spain, the designation of nationality may controversially take on ethnicaspects, subsuming smaller ethnic groups such as Welsh, Bretons and Basques, making it difficult to quantify a “British” or “French” ethnicity, for example.
Approximately 20 million non-Europeans live in the EU, 4% of the overall population.

Russia

The Russian Federation is home to as many as 160 different ethnic groups and indigenous peoples. As of the 2010 census, 80.90% of the population that disclosed their ethnicity (111,016,896 people) is ethnically Russian, followed by (groups larger than one million):
 3.87% Tatars (5,310,649)
 1.40% Ukrainians (1,927,988)
 1.15% Bashkirs (1,584,554)
 1.05% Chuvashs (1,435,872)
 1.04% Chechens (1,431,360)
 0.86% Armenians (1,182,388)

That’s definitely the case when it comes to the host countries the happen to live in, but I f the Zionists could get their wish and expel the remaining Palestinians, Israel would be virtually 100% Jewish.

You start out with, "Rather than focusing on religious affiliation, Sam, it may be more insightful to examine the demographics by ethnic groups "; then, having dug out ethnicities at great length in each of the states mentioned, proceed to declare in the end "...Israel would be virtually 100% Jewish.". That's a systemwide breakdown in argumentation.

[I had once given people on this webzine a sense of the incredible diversity of ethnicities, not religious affiliations in Israel, and someone scoffed at it claiming those ethnicities are irrelevant. So it appears that for those such as yourself, geokat, Jewish religiosity, and ethnicity are separable only when it suits your point of view, which, as we just witnessed, is fraught with glaring internal inconsistencies.]

"I’d suggest a simple explanation. Jews want to import Muslims to fight Christ and the Church."

I would say that is not an effective way. If violent Muslims come to the West and attack Christians, it will only strengthen Christianity. Now, it might be useful in a divide-and-rule away: Make goy fight goy.

Anyway, the most effective weapon against Christianity has been spiritual appropriation: Enemies of Christianity appropriating Christianity for their own agenda. It is in contrast to the old way of iconoclasm.
When communists smashed 10,000s of churches, they nearly wiped out Christianity but also lent Christianity the glow of martyrdom. So, the Russian Church survived and even gained moral legitimacy. Prior to the Revolution, it was seen as a partner of repressive Tsarism. But after the Revolution, it came to symbolize the survival of Russian culture and spirit through the cold winter of communism.
And look how the Catholic Church played a significant role in Poland because it was seen as a patriotic sanctuary from communism(associated with the dreaded Russians).

Christianity thrives on persecution. After all, it is founded on the myth of Jesus's Crucifixion and generations grew up hearing about how Nero fed Christians to the lions.

So, what is the most effective way to destroy Christianity? There are Negromania and hedonism because they addict young ones to culture of instant gratification.
Another is New Age flakery that offers some pseudo-spiritual pablum, the feely-good stuff without the so-called 'judgementalism'. That way, you can be a slob and cretin but still feel the aura of holiness via charlatans like Oprah and Chopra. Inane and 'inoffensive', a kind of something-for-everyone that makes everyone so warm and huggy-wuggy.

Another way is to penetrate Christianity and rewrite its genetic code. Viruses do this. They sneak into cells instead of attacking them head on. They enter into the nuclei and start messing up stuff, even leading to mutations of genetic code. Since the Core of Christianity is anti-homo, anti-degeneracy, and anti-hedonistic, the Body of Christianity waged a war on decadence. So, the trick was to send agents into the very core of Christianity and rewrite its meanings. It would lead to spiritual appropriation. And the churches made this easy for their enemies. Due to Catholic Church's rules on priesthood and celibacy, most healthy men found Catholic priesthood abhorrent. The result was a bunch of homos taking over as secret agents. And Mainline churches became so soulless and gutless that they failed to inspire people, and so, a bunch of lesbians took over as agents. Once they got into the core of Christian Institutions via their Long March into the church, they changed its DNA so that the new gospel was Jesus is for homos and trannies.

This is why the Pussy Riot was the stupid ineffective way. Its nasty antics of defilement made many Russians sympathize with the Church.
The more effective way to desecrate the church is to change its DNA from within. To do this, you must feign piousness and faith in Christ. Then, you study theology, gain accreditation, and enter as a clergymen and gradually climb up the ranks. Once you get to the top, you change the core meaning of Christianity.
It's like TERMINATOR 2. How did the enemy of humans become a friend of humans and enemy of other machines? Humans reprogrammed its mecha 'DNA'.

Same with American Laws. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that would allow 'gay marriage'. But America's Rule of Law can be used to undermine Rule of Law. And Jewish lawyers and judges like Ruth Baird Ginsburg and Elena Kagan did just this. They worked up the legal system, became supreme court justices, and disregarded the Constitution and legalized 'gay marriage'. Since the Constitution says the Supreme Court has the final say on legal matters, Jewish Power could get away with this abomination.

If violent Muslims come to the West and attack Christians, it will only strengthen Christianity

Christianity is already effectively dead. You can’t strengthen a corpse. The West is well and truly post-Christian. Europeans and Americans don’t care if Christianity is persecuted because Christianity is irrelevant to them.

The things that are relevant to modern Europeans and Americans are the really important things, the core values of our civilisation – shopping, virtue-signalling and porn.

The West is well and truly post-Christian. Europeans and Americans don’t care if Christianity is persecuted because Christianity is irrelevant to them.

Christianity don't have a terretial "home". To claim otherwise is to commit a sin of phyloteism. Or are you equating the whole world with "The West"?

I strongly believe that Christians must abandon any romantic attachment to Western culture (especially in its modern form) and stand resolutely against it.
Christianity has no homeland on Earth.

America was never Christian.

Sure, there was a time when the number of Christians in America was much greater, and they took their faith much more seriously. Yes. But "America", as a country or as a culture, was never in itself Christian. The dominant cultural values in America (individualism, commercialism, competitiveness) have always been opposed to Christian values.

The things that are relevant to modern Europeans and Americans are the really important things, the core values of our civilisation – shopping, virtue-signalling and porn.

Humans were always base, imperfect creatures. Besides, the influence of Christianity on Western culture is vastly overrated. Or are you saying that in the Middle Ages Europeans:

a) behaved in a more Christian manner than people from other cultures?

b) Helped their neighbors more, gave more money to the poor (relative to their wealth) and took better care of the sick and dying?

c) Fought fewer wars and were they less inclined to conquest and plunder and exploitation?

d) Were more faithful to their spouses and had fewer instances of sexual immorality?

No, no, not at all. In fact, in many of these respects, Western culture is demonstrably worse than any others. From the 16th to the 20th century Western culture was the #1 purveyor of war, conquest and genocide across the planet, and since the 20th century is has become the #1 purveyor of sexual immorality.

Nice article but ultimately myopic. This isn’t mainly or solely about Christianity, it is about money and power. Shamir has shown that much of Zionism and Jewish identity is a moneymaking scam invented by top businessmen. The billionaire oligarchs didn’t get where they are by obsessing over ancient religious disputes. Like President Drumpf, they got there by ruthless dedication to the bottom line.

Cohesive, self-sufficient communities are bad for the bottom line. Religion, marriage, family, culture, identity, everything that bonds people together and creates strong communities thwarts the ambitions of big corporations and government. Billionaire Controllers want a populace of isolated, fearful, divided individuals, easily enslaved by the System, working all day for megacorporations, spending their meager earnings on pills, therapy, entertainment, porn, and never ever thinking about joining with their fellow citizens to throw off the yoke of the capitalist oligarchs and their stooges in government and media. For that purpose, importing millions of Muslims to America is a no-brainer.

As to President Drumpf, he is another transparent crypto-Jew placed in the White House to promote business interests. (What, you seriously believe Ivanka “converted” to Judaism? No, like Donald, she has been Jewish her entire life.) The controversy we are seeing – to the extent it really exists – is a power struggle among the top families. Perhaps to some degree, Drumpf’s interests conflict with those of Soros and other internationalist Jews. But mostly it is fake media circus, invented to keep us distracted while the billionaires consolidate their power.

Money is just another tool in the battle for power and for subjugation; it can't be a true bottom line. Do not forget, FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can't be created in such a way.

Two lousy candidates to choose from and I actually was leaning towards Trump until I heard his speech to AIPAC and started to look more into his background. Did that make me pro-Hillary, nope, still hated her just as much and she is even more beholden to AIPAC and the Neocon establishment. With her, war was a given and I think she would be more dangerous because she could successfully carry forward the status quo for another 4 to 8 years. With Trump, at least there was the chance of an anti-establishment coup plus if anything else, he would help speed up the process of the inevitable crumbling of the status quo, although unintentionally and through blunder.

If you “think she would be more dangerous” then you must be at least marginally relieved that Trump won.

Trump is a gift. If you like him, you’re happy. If you don’t, he’s responsible for activating citizen involvement. Much of this ‘resistance’ may be misguided, but at least people woke up. If Hillary had won, there would be NOTHING like this, even if she’d gone straight to invading Syria.

Trump has properly identified the enemy: the Fakestream Media. He may have his own reality, but that doesn’t make the FSM any less fake.

The Fakestream Media is grinding the fake news memes into our brains. They repeat as fact that Putin invaded Ukraine, Assad used chemical weapons, Trump is a Russian puppet, etc., etc. Hillary couldn’t/wouldn’t chastise the Fakestream like Trump. And the SNL parody was hilarious, but Sean Spicer is a gem.

Ron Unz wrote about breaking the FSM last year:

Groups advocating policies opposed by the American establishment should recognize that the greatest obstacle they face is usually the mainstream media.The Media Should Be Made a Primary Target

Yep, agree on everything you said. All I'm saying is I have been reading Shamir for a minute and on Trump, he looks like he is starting to break a sweat trying to keep every new development within the narrow confines of the story he wants us to believe. It all makes for great reading and he does drop nuggets of wisdom throughout all his material which is why I love him.

"I’d suggest a simple explanation. Jews want to import Muslims to fight Christ and the Church."

I would say that is not an effective way. If violent Muslims come to the West and attack Christians, it will only strengthen Christianity. Now, it might be useful in a divide-and-rule away: Make goy fight goy.

Anyway, the most effective weapon against Christianity has been spiritual appropriation: Enemies of Christianity appropriating Christianity for their own agenda. It is in contrast to the old way of iconoclasm.
When communists smashed 10,000s of churches, they nearly wiped out Christianity but also lent Christianity the glow of martyrdom. So, the Russian Church survived and even gained moral legitimacy. Prior to the Revolution, it was seen as a partner of repressive Tsarism. But after the Revolution, it came to symbolize the survival of Russian culture and spirit through the cold winter of communism.
And look how the Catholic Church played a significant role in Poland because it was seen as a patriotic sanctuary from communism(associated with the dreaded Russians).

Christianity thrives on persecution. After all, it is founded on the myth of Jesus's Crucifixion and generations grew up hearing about how Nero fed Christians to the lions.

So, what is the most effective way to destroy Christianity? There are Negromania and hedonism because they addict young ones to culture of instant gratification.
Another is New Age flakery that offers some pseudo-spiritual pablum, the feely-good stuff without the so-called 'judgementalism'. That way, you can be a slob and cretin but still feel the aura of holiness via charlatans like Oprah and Chopra. Inane and 'inoffensive', a kind of something-for-everyone that makes everyone so warm and huggy-wuggy.

Another way is to penetrate Christianity and rewrite its genetic code. Viruses do this. They sneak into cells instead of attacking them head on. They enter into the nuclei and start messing up stuff, even leading to mutations of genetic code. Since the Core of Christianity is anti-homo, anti-degeneracy, and anti-hedonistic, the Body of Christianity waged a war on decadence. So, the trick was to send agents into the very core of Christianity and rewrite its meanings. It would lead to spiritual appropriation. And the churches made this easy for their enemies. Due to Catholic Church's rules on priesthood and celibacy, most healthy men found Catholic priesthood abhorrent. The result was a bunch of homos taking over as secret agents. And Mainline churches became so soulless and gutless that they failed to inspire people, and so, a bunch of lesbians took over as agents. Once they got into the core of Christian Institutions via their Long March into the church, they changed its DNA so that the new gospel was Jesus is for homos and trannies.

This is why the Pussy Riot was the stupid ineffective way. Its nasty antics of defilement made many Russians sympathize with the Church.
The more effective way to desecrate the church is to change its DNA from within. To do this, you must feign piousness and faith in Christ. Then, you study theology, gain accreditation, and enter as a clergymen and gradually climb up the ranks. Once you get to the top, you change the core meaning of Christianity.
It's like TERMINATOR 2. How did the enemy of humans become a friend of humans and enemy of other machines? Humans reprogrammed its mecha 'DNA'.

Same with American Laws. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that would allow 'gay marriage'. But America's Rule of Law can be used to undermine Rule of Law. And Jewish lawyers and judges like Ruth Baird Ginsburg and Elena Kagan did just this. They worked up the legal system, became supreme court justices, and disregarded the Constitution and legalized 'gay marriage'. Since the Constitution says the Supreme Court has the final say on legal matters, Jewish Power could get away with this abomination.

“Another is New Age flakery that offers some pseudo-spiritual pablum, the feely-good stuff without the so-called ‘judgementalism’. That way, you can be a slob and cretin but still feel the aura of holiness via charlatans like Oprah and Chopra. Inane and ‘inoffensive’, a kind of something-for-everyone that makes everyone so warm and huggy-wuggy.”

Thank you for this absolutely spot on description of “new ageism” nonsense. It would be a pestilence if wasn’t just so pathetic.

Shamir, I get that you're a Trump/Bannon fan and have gone to great lengths to not shed too much light on Trump's family support for and to Israel that spans back 50 years but do you not think that mentioning more about his long history of support for ZIonism should be mentioned? Who cares that it doesn't serve your point to mention these things? I have read many of your books and I love them but uncritical support for anyone is not what I expected from you. Maybe write an article about Bannon's championing of the Judaic-Christian myth and how this disqualifies Trump from being the sort of Christian savior you enjoy describing him as. Instead you're taking a page out of Bannon's book by lightly suggesting that these immigrants are coming to America with a hatred of Christians in mind. More likely that the majority of these immigrants hate the ISIS version of Islam more than Christians who many of these refugees have lived with before coming here. Most refugees I have encountered are very clear that the true enemy is the Israeli/Saudi/Zionist cancer in the middle east and they rightfully blame them for their displacement. Jews want these Muslim victims of Zionism in America so they can cast their justified anti-Israelism as anti-American and effectively stop the rising tide of American anti-Israelism. You're playing a dangerous game by turning a blind eye to realities that you see in Trump that you do not want to acknowledge because it doesn't serve your point.

Trump Family Has 50-Year History of Donating to Jewish, Israeli Causeshttps://www.breakingisraelnews.com/78896/trump-family-50-year-history-donating-jewish-israeli-causes/#TeHCAczMjsCTOJ9E.97

Jared Kushner -Trump’s Court Jewhttp://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1179

Trump's Not Our Guy. It's Time to Stop Pretending Otherwise.http://therightstuff.biz/2016/04/25/trumps-not-our-guy-its-time-to-stop-pretending-otherwise/

If you think of how a mosque has been built over the top of the Western Wall in Jerusalem, and anointed as so very important to the Muslims so that the Jews cannot get rid of it, your story about complicity of Jews and Muslims starts to sound ridiculous.

There is no complicity, but Jews want to use Muslims against Christians, and Christians against Muslims. The idea is to cause a great war between Muslims and Christians, with Jews the ultimate winner. Actually it was discussed in Haaretz and presented as the main idea of Netanyahu he inherited from his father.

Are you sure there is no confirmation bias in your fine piece? In other words, does one not here, fall into the trap of discarding all data which stand contrary to one's deeply held preconceptions? Is this not predictable fodder for well-known biases?

Jews are not a monolithic bloc, even on the question of Israel's immigration laws [more on this in due course].

First, Israel - Ha'Aretz - was conceived as the solitary Jewish majority nation for reasons of providing sanctuary. You, my friend, view the world through the lens of a rare chameleon; one which changed religious shades with an ease such as its inner purposes had swung and guided. I shan’t comment on them except to remark that it allows you to shift between a conflation of Zionism with Judaism, and then blithely separate Orthodoxy from Liberal Jewish views: a feat which some might ascribe to the inescapable genes ;-) .

On Israel’s immigration laws it needs to be noted that while Jews are welcome to obtain citizenship, Aliya or actual establishment of residency is required.

Numbers, as I often remark, are of the essence. Jews and Muslims share a mixed history, one which largely speaks to a harmonious Jewish experience under Muslim rule. One more observation: you introduced the notion of a Protestant cooperation, even supplication, to Jewish mind rays against Catholics. It’s a convenient story which disregards the manifest philosophical accord between the Evangelical churches and Israel; and that is not a value-laden statement, merely a factual observation.

Jews are instinctively tolerant of diversity; that much is true for obvious reasons: a small group of travellers cannot be otherwise. It taught them the value of working with inspired peoples of many nations even as that experience on occasion met with violence: shoulders shrugged and feet moved on.

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration - here are the little beasts:

One more observation: you introduced the notion of a Protestant cooperation, even supplication, to Jewish mind rays against Catholics.

That mind ray machine has been replaced by a new and better model at least seven times. The Russian immigrant scientists have been instrumental in this. Catholics are a side show what with their current moonbat, pro-Muslim, communist Pope. So the mind ray machines in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem are focused on the brains (such as the are) of Muslim leaders in the Middle East and the smelly ayatollahs in Iran.

Are you sure there is no confirmation bias in your fine piece? In other words, does one not here, fall into the trap of discarding all data which stand contrary to one's deeply held preconceptions? Is this not predictable fodder for well-known biases?

Jews are not a monolithic bloc, even on the question of Israel's immigration laws [more on this in due course].

First, Israel - Ha'Aretz - was conceived as the solitary Jewish majority nation for reasons of providing sanctuary. You, my friend, view the world through the lens of a rare chameleon; one which changed religious shades with an ease such as its inner purposes had swung and guided. I shan’t comment on them except to remark that it allows you to shift between a conflation of Zionism with Judaism, and then blithely separate Orthodoxy from Liberal Jewish views: a feat which some might ascribe to the inescapable genes ;-) .

On Israel’s immigration laws it needs to be noted that while Jews are welcome to obtain citizenship, Aliya or actual establishment of residency is required.

Numbers, as I often remark, are of the essence. Jews and Muslims share a mixed history, one which largely speaks to a harmonious Jewish experience under Muslim rule. One more observation: you introduced the notion of a Protestant cooperation, even supplication, to Jewish mind rays against Catholics. It’s a convenient story which disregards the manifest philosophical accord between the Evangelical churches and Israel; and that is not a value-laden statement, merely a factual observation.

Jews are instinctively tolerant of diversity; that much is true for obvious reasons: a small group of travellers cannot be otherwise. It taught them the value of working with inspired peoples of many nations even as that experience on occasion met with violence: shoulders shrugged and feet moved on.

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration - here are the little beasts:

If you "think she would be more dangerous" then you must be at least marginally relieved that Trump won.

Trump is a gift. If you like him, you're happy. If you don't, he's responsible for activating citizen involvement. Much of this 'resistance' may be misguided, but at least people woke up. If Hillary had won, there would be NOTHING like this, even if she'd gone straight to invading Syria.

Trump has properly identified the enemy: the Fakestream Media. He may have his own reality, but that doesn't make the FSM any less fake.

The Fakestream Media is grinding the fake news memes into our brains. They repeat as fact that Putin invaded Ukraine, Assad used chemical weapons, Trump is a Russian puppet, etc., etc. Hillary couldn't/wouldn't chastise the Fakestream like Trump. And the SNL parody was hilarious, but Sean Spicer is a gem.

Ron Unz wrote about breaking the FSM last year:

Groups advocating policies opposed by the American establishment should recognize that the greatest obstacle they face is usually the mainstream media.
The Media Should Be Made a Primary Targethttp://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-breaching-the-media-barrier/

Yep, agree on everything you said. All I’m saying is I have been reading Shamir for a minute and on Trump, he looks like he is starting to break a sweat trying to keep every new development within the narrow confines of the story he wants us to believe. It all makes for great reading and he does drop nuggets of wisdom throughout all his material which is why I love him.

If you think of how a mosque has been built over the top of the Western Wall in Jerusalem, and anointed as so very important to the Muslims so that the Jews cannot get rid of it, your story about complicity of Jews and Muslims starts to sound ridiculous.

There is no complicity, but Jews want to use Muslims against Christians, and Christians against Muslims. The idea is to cause a great war between Muslims and Christians, with Jews the ultimate winner. Actually it was discussed in Haaretz and presented as the main idea of Netanyahu he inherited from his father.

Nice article but ultimately myopic. This isn't mainly or solely about Christianity, it is about money and power. Shamir has shown that much of Zionism and Jewish identity is a moneymaking scam invented by top businessmen. The billionaire oligarchs didn't get where they are by obsessing over ancient religious disputes. Like President Drumpf, they got there by ruthless dedication to the bottom line.

Cohesive, self-sufficient communities are bad for the bottom line. Religion, marriage, family, culture, identity, everything that bonds people together and creates strong communities thwarts the ambitions of big corporations and government. Billionaire Controllers want a populace of isolated, fearful, divided individuals, easily enslaved by the System, working all day for megacorporations, spending their meager earnings on pills, therapy, entertainment, porn, and never ever thinking about joining with their fellow citizens to throw off the yoke of the capitalist oligarchs and their stooges in government and media. For that purpose, importing millions of Muslims to America is a no-brainer.

As to President Drumpf, he is another transparent crypto-Jew placed in the White House to promote business interests. (What, you seriously believe Ivanka "converted" to Judaism? No, like Donald, she has been Jewish her entire life.) The controversy we are seeing - to the extent it really exists - is a power struggle among the top families. Perhaps to some degree, Drumpf's interests conflict with those of Soros and other internationalist Jews. But mostly it is fake media circus, invented to keep us distracted while the billionaires consolidate their power.

Money is just another tool in the battle for power and for subjugation; it can’t be a true bottom line. Do not forget, FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can’t be created in such a way.

FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can’t be created in such a way.

I don't know Mr. Shamir.. I suspect that being able to create as much money as you can imagine, and spread it all around strategically, can have a significant effect on being able to amass and wield sheer, raw power as well.

Look at just what Soros has wrought, and he's only a dime player compared to Rothschild with his counterfeiting machine, with which he can send trillion$ to hot spots the world over.

one of my strongly felt positions is that we humans should not continue to over-populate and wipe out all the ecology and wildlife on this planet. There are a lot of people that agree. And so a few of them at the Sierra Club realized that most of the numbers of exponentially increasing humans in N. America were coming from S. America as immigrants, and so they considered lobbying to halt this devastating influx of people. And then on cue, a ((man)) with a lot of money sent them a hundred million dollar check on the promise that they never again mention immigration. He liked that America was being transformed, and used his money to effect policy. Money = power, at least in many instances.

I suspect that if we could end the Fed, in a generation or two, we'd get back our Senate and even some media- who knows, perhaps eventually even control of our destiny.

It's all about opposition to the cross of Christ and His Church. Money and power are merely means.

Make Yourself An Ark! by Father Andrew O'Brien, pp.64-65:

Down through the centuries, theologians and saints of the Catholic Church found it very difficult to explain how antichrist could bring the world under his political and religious dominion. Now we know. God's greatest punishment is chastisement, and the reign of the antichrist. Holy Scripture tells us what the antichrist does, and it includes this, “He compelled everybody, small and great, rich and poor, slave and citizen, to be branded on the right hand or on the forehead, and made it illegal for anyone to buy or sell anything unless he had been branded with the name of the beast or with the number.” (Apocalypse 13:16,17). This, then, is the devil's plan, to rule the whole world, and his people are almost ready to deliver it to him. The super-capitalists are in Financiers Enslave the World 31 control of global high finance, with Zionism as their nationalism, and Communism as their bulldozer to eliminate all other nationalisms. “Taking him to a high mountain, the devil showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. ‘I will give you all these,' he said, ‘if you fall at my feet and worship me'.” (Luke 4:8-10). As Honore de Balzac once said, “The final battle for Christianity will be over the money problem, and until that is solved there can be no universal application of Christianity.”

The revolutionary change in the realm of high finance calls for a corresponding revolutionary change in the realm of politics, since a fully internationalized high finance cannot coexist in harmony with innumerable national concentrations of political power. The seizing of all wealth and political power on a global scale must also of necessity include control of all mankind through conditioning and manipulation of the mind and spirit of human beings...

Are you sure there is no confirmation bias in your fine piece? In other words, does one not here, fall into the trap of discarding all data which stand contrary to one's deeply held preconceptions? Is this not predictable fodder for well-known biases?

Jews are not a monolithic bloc, even on the question of Israel's immigration laws [more on this in due course].

First, Israel - Ha'Aretz - was conceived as the solitary Jewish majority nation for reasons of providing sanctuary. You, my friend, view the world through the lens of a rare chameleon; one which changed religious shades with an ease such as its inner purposes had swung and guided. I shan’t comment on them except to remark that it allows you to shift between a conflation of Zionism with Judaism, and then blithely separate Orthodoxy from Liberal Jewish views: a feat which some might ascribe to the inescapable genes ;-) .

On Israel’s immigration laws it needs to be noted that while Jews are welcome to obtain citizenship, Aliya or actual establishment of residency is required.

Numbers, as I often remark, are of the essence. Jews and Muslims share a mixed history, one which largely speaks to a harmonious Jewish experience under Muslim rule. One more observation: you introduced the notion of a Protestant cooperation, even supplication, to Jewish mind rays against Catholics. It’s a convenient story which disregards the manifest philosophical accord between the Evangelical churches and Israel; and that is not a value-laden statement, merely a factual observation.

Jews are instinctively tolerant of diversity; that much is true for obvious reasons: a small group of travellers cannot be otherwise. It taught them the value of working with inspired peoples of many nations even as that experience on occasion met with violence: shoulders shrugged and feet moved on.

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration - here are the little beasts:

Sam, there is one confusion in your presentation: you do not distinguish native and imported Muslims. In Russia or Palestine, or India, Muslims are natives. Hundred years ago, in what today is Israel, Muslims were 90 p.c. So it has no connection to the Muslim immigration. Jews expelled hundreds of thousands Muslims and Christians from their homes. And they did not allow any back, let alone allowing any Muslim immigration. Do you understand the difference?

I am not confused Israel, merely astonished by the blatant inconsistencies which people engage in when immigration into Israel is the subject of discussion.

You know the history as well as I do, perhaps better; what remains as fact is the universality of atrocities committed while nation-states are under formation. In this regard Israel is not unique; one might even observe that while the exodus of Palestinian Arabs was every bit as tragic as population exoduses go, it may have been more so on account of the exhortations of Arab leaders to vacate remote areas mistakenly understood by the community as a call for full-scale evacuation. One might further observe, that as formations of nation-states go, the creation of Israel was based on far sounder principles of historical claim and international agreement - and I write this, acutely aware of the controversy prevailing upon that subject. Still, I stand behind that position.

I stand behind it, for if 'hundreds-of-years' is a measure of nativity, surely thousands of years are more so; and 'Ashkenazi' is merely the creation of a time-scale which stands in deference to a far more ancient one. Genetics confirm that view. By that standard, a true Palestinian Levantine, Muslim or Christian, has a sanguinary claim to the very same; but not the numerous latter-day 'Palestinians' which are Arabs from Saudi, Egypt, Libya, Syria etc. looking for an EZ Pass into Israel. The RoR as it has devolved into today is a transparent sleight of hand to deluge the demographics of Israel. On a related topic, the Palestinian leadership has precious little wish to resolve matters and share a general prosperity with their people, threatening the RoR as a negotiating tool, which they know to be impossible for the State to accept thus prolonging their own positions of privilege and grievance mining.

I am so grateful for your comments, my esteemed readers of UR! Indeed it is blessing to have so many wise readers who share of their wisdom. It is a great difference comparing with silly remarks one gets on other site. I do not respond to each comment, but I read all and store them for future reference. Thank you!

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

I can vouch for that!

Right here, on UR, I was told something similar, i.e., that there was no point in Giraldi’s piece, "Taking Down" British Officials” examining “how the Israeli Embassy in London connived with government officials to “take down” parliamentarians and government ministers …” because everyone does it. It should be expected behavior, obligatory, even.

I replied that if that’s how the game is played, then I expect to hear no more whining about “The” holocaust because, well, what would you expect? Shit happens, so perhaps we should just forget about it.

A couple of the mouthy punks had piled on me, but I haven't heard from either one since.

I do thank the has-brat narcissistic hypocrites for educating me.

People project. Jews assume their world view is shared by others.

I think its useful to understand the source of Jewish strength and European weakness.

Jews operate from a standpoint of “certainty” – Europeans from a position of “questioning”. The Jew knows exactly “who” he is and pursues clear materialistic goals – the European puts his faith in a process of “discovery”. He has a fluid identity.

For Jews, factionalism is at the core of life – a people that “dwells apart” – life is a war between factions, and survival is the goal.

This is an immensely strong position from which to conduct one’s life – a firm foundation, a clear path, unquestioned assumptions – all that’s left is the implementation, tactics, strategies. Your strength is not diverted by futile questions of identity or ultimate ends.

The European approach to life leads to world changing discovery, science, and technology, while the Jewish approach is a fantastic starting point from which to acquire power and wealth.

However “noble” the European approach may be, it makes one vulnerable to people whose goals aren’t similarly “high minded”. Stargazing may be a fine and noble activity, but the thief can steal in and leave with the furniture.

To some extent, this sketch characterizes Europeans peculiar vulnerability to Asians and Muslims as well, people who know who they are and have clear goals.

The dilemna facing Europeans is acute – to cease being vulnerable, Europeans must end their peculiar project of fluid discovery as a way of life and acquire a clear and stable identity, but doing so would end the peculiar European ability to invent new technologies. In other words, to grow stronger Europeans would have to grow weaker. A paradox few are willing to face. Europeans would have to become a “normal” people, but are secretly proud of their exceptionalism.

In the end Jews are trapped in their own mind systems, and are as much victims of it as they are victimizers of others. Jews live Hobbesian, animalistic lives, and are obsessed with issues of personal adequacy and ego. Not fun.

"Jews live Hobbesian, animalistic lives, and are obsessed with issues of personal adequacy and ego." - This strategy (conscious or not) only works while they live as a minority among a host society. Let them be Hobbesian and animalistic but among themselves. But they really do not want to do it. It took Holocaust to create Israel. Prior to it Zionists had no support among Jews.

"I’d suggest a simple explanation. Jews want to import Muslims to fight Christ and the Church."

I would say that is not an effective way. If violent Muslims come to the West and attack Christians, it will only strengthen Christianity. Now, it might be useful in a divide-and-rule away: Make goy fight goy.

Anyway, the most effective weapon against Christianity has been spiritual appropriation: Enemies of Christianity appropriating Christianity for their own agenda. It is in contrast to the old way of iconoclasm.
When communists smashed 10,000s of churches, they nearly wiped out Christianity but also lent Christianity the glow of martyrdom. So, the Russian Church survived and even gained moral legitimacy. Prior to the Revolution, it was seen as a partner of repressive Tsarism. But after the Revolution, it came to symbolize the survival of Russian culture and spirit through the cold winter of communism.
And look how the Catholic Church played a significant role in Poland because it was seen as a patriotic sanctuary from communism(associated with the dreaded Russians).

Christianity thrives on persecution. After all, it is founded on the myth of Jesus's Crucifixion and generations grew up hearing about how Nero fed Christians to the lions.

So, what is the most effective way to destroy Christianity? There are Negromania and hedonism because they addict young ones to culture of instant gratification.
Another is New Age flakery that offers some pseudo-spiritual pablum, the feely-good stuff without the so-called 'judgementalism'. That way, you can be a slob and cretin but still feel the aura of holiness via charlatans like Oprah and Chopra. Inane and 'inoffensive', a kind of something-for-everyone that makes everyone so warm and huggy-wuggy.

Another way is to penetrate Christianity and rewrite its genetic code. Viruses do this. They sneak into cells instead of attacking them head on. They enter into the nuclei and start messing up stuff, even leading to mutations of genetic code. Since the Core of Christianity is anti-homo, anti-degeneracy, and anti-hedonistic, the Body of Christianity waged a war on decadence. So, the trick was to send agents into the very core of Christianity and rewrite its meanings. It would lead to spiritual appropriation. And the churches made this easy for their enemies. Due to Catholic Church's rules on priesthood and celibacy, most healthy men found Catholic priesthood abhorrent. The result was a bunch of homos taking over as secret agents. And Mainline churches became so soulless and gutless that they failed to inspire people, and so, a bunch of lesbians took over as agents. Once they got into the core of Christian Institutions via their Long March into the church, they changed its DNA so that the new gospel was Jesus is for homos and trannies.

This is why the Pussy Riot was the stupid ineffective way. Its nasty antics of defilement made many Russians sympathize with the Church.
The more effective way to desecrate the church is to change its DNA from within. To do this, you must feign piousness and faith in Christ. Then, you study theology, gain accreditation, and enter as a clergymen and gradually climb up the ranks. Once you get to the top, you change the core meaning of Christianity.
It's like TERMINATOR 2. How did the enemy of humans become a friend of humans and enemy of other machines? Humans reprogrammed its mecha 'DNA'.

Same with American Laws. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that would allow 'gay marriage'. But America's Rule of Law can be used to undermine Rule of Law. And Jewish lawyers and judges like Ruth Baird Ginsburg and Elena Kagan did just this. They worked up the legal system, became supreme court justices, and disregarded the Constitution and legalized 'gay marriage'. Since the Constitution says the Supreme Court has the final say on legal matters, Jewish Power could get away with this abomination.

Good takes all, Priss. Most effective also was the absolute washing away of any public displays of Christianity. From schools, the Ten Commandments, crosses, nativity scenes, all gone. Making the very mention of “Merry Christmas” blasphemy against the “State” was pretty good, too. Plays at school with any notions whatsoever of Christianity, all gone. But every Muslim symbol there is? All good.

I’m surprised however that Jewish worship, synagogues, bar mitzvah and the associated parties and large gatherings of Jews aren’t under attack here. Somehow, Jews in the U.S. seem to live under a cloak even though they are hugely over-represented in every facet of life in the U.S.. They seem to get no credit here for Israel’s excesses against Muslims over there.

I’m not rooting for that, understand, but it seems as if there’s an informal quid pro quo.

Race / Ethnicity Number Percentage of Israel population
Israelis 8,585,000 100.0 %
Jews. 6,419,000 74.8 %
Arab 1,786,000 20.8%
Others (including family members of Jewish immigrants who are not registered at the Ministry of Interior as Jews, non-Arab Christians, non-Arab Muslims and residents who do not have an ethnic or religious classification)
380,000 4.4%

Europe

Pan and Pfeil (2004) count 87 distinct "peoples of Europe", of which 33 form the majority population in at least one sovereign state, while the remaining 54 constitute ethnic minorities. The total number of national minority populations in Europe is estimated at 105 million people, or 14% of 770 million Europeans. (including Europeans in Asian Russia)
The largest ethnic groups are the Russians, of whom 92 million reside in Europe, the Germans, with 72 million. In some countries such as the United Kingdom, France and Spain, the designation of nationality may controversially take on ethnicaspects, subsuming smaller ethnic groups such as Welsh, Bretons and Basques, making it difficult to quantify a "British" or "French" ethnicity, for example.
Approximately 20 million non-Europeans live in the EU, 4% of the overall population.

Russia

The Russian Federation is home to as many as 160 different ethnic groups and indigenous peoples. As of the 2010 census, 80.90% of the population that disclosed their ethnicity (111,016,896 people) is ethnically Russian, followed by (groups larger than one million):
 3.87% Tatars (5,310,649)
 1.40% Ukrainians (1,927,988)
 1.15% Bashkirs (1,584,554)
 1.05% Chuvashs (1,435,872)
 1.04% Chechens (1,431,360)
 0.86% Armenians (1,182,388)

That's definitely the case when it comes to the host countries the happen to live in, but I f the Zionists could get their wish and expel the remaining Palestinians, Israel would be virtually 100% Jewish.

You start out with, “Rather than focusing on religious affiliation, Sam, it may be more insightful to examine the demographics by ethnic groups “; then, having dug out ethnicities at great length in each of the states mentioned, proceed to declare in the end “…Israel would be virtually 100% Jewish.“. That’s a systemwide breakdown in argumentation.

[I had once given people on this webzine a sense of the incredible diversity of ethnicities, not religious affiliations in Israel, and someone scoffed at it claiming those ethnicities are irrelevant. So it appears that for those such as yourself, geokat, Jewish religiosity, and ethnicity are separable only when it suits your point of view, which, as we just witnessed, is fraught with glaring internal inconsistencies.]

Most of us characterize "Jewishness" as an ethnicity, which it is in the U.S. It may not be in Israel.

Nevertheless, isn't Israel a secular state? I'm also surprised there isn't a significant percentage of atheists; if geokat's are government figures it appears the government does treat "Jewishness" as a race/ethnicity.

Ok, Sam. Why don't you try providing us with the breakdown of ethnic groups in Israel without using the term Jewish?

Wiki:

The Jews, also known as the Jewish people, are an ethnoreligious group originating from the Israelites, or Hebrews, of the Ancient Near East. Jewish ethnicity, nationhood and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation, while its observance varies from strict observance to complete nonobservance.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews

btw - I didn't create the ethnic group categories for Israel, I retrieved them from this wilki entry:

@ RudyM
The CIA, the US war party and the ukie oligarchs.
Is McCainistan jewish, is Nuland jewish, is Killary jewish, is Brzezinski jewish ? These bastards play the Great game against Russia for decades, they don't give a shit about jewishness or zionism. They supported the maoists, they supported and still support the jihadists, they support the ukronazis. It's not about ideology nor religion, it's about geostrategy : isolate Russia, divide Eurasia and rule.

Victoria Nuland is, in fact, Jewish. So is George Soros, who financed the Femen and was involved in financing the insurgents who overthrew the Ukrainian regime. And also is apparently financing some of the blackshirt thugs who attack peaceful rightists these days.

That’s not to say everything is one big Jewish conspiracy, or that all Jews are enemies. But to discount the Jewish radical tradition in this country, and especially the back-story of the Neo-Trots, is to overlook a huge factor in the explosion of imperialism and attacks against freedom in America in the last few decades.

You start out with, "Rather than focusing on religious affiliation, Sam, it may be more insightful to examine the demographics by ethnic groups "; then, having dug out ethnicities at great length in each of the states mentioned, proceed to declare in the end "...Israel would be virtually 100% Jewish.". That's a systemwide breakdown in argumentation.

[I had once given people on this webzine a sense of the incredible diversity of ethnicities, not religious affiliations in Israel, and someone scoffed at it claiming those ethnicities are irrelevant. So it appears that for those such as yourself, geokat, Jewish religiosity, and ethnicity are separable only when it suits your point of view, which, as we just witnessed, is fraught with glaring internal inconsistencies.]

Most of us characterize “Jewishness” as an ethnicity, which it is in the U.S. It may not be in Israel.

Nevertheless, isn’t Israel a secular state? I’m also surprised there isn’t a significant percentage of atheists; if geokat’s are government figures it appears the government does treat “Jewishness” as a race/ethnicity.

Jewishness is in some sense, perhaps even genetically, an ethnicity. It's clearly a faith, one which has relatively few adherents, and a history replete with events which tend to impart [at least to many Ashkenazis] that unmistakable character marked by eccentric nervousness [Woody Allen?]. You won't find that among Mizrachis [Moroccans, Yemenis, Iraquis etc] . Being a non-proselytising religion it stands to reason the observed genetic similarities found among the phenotype distributions.

If you visit Israel you'll be struck by the phenotypical variations. Ashkenazim look very different from the Mizrachim. Culturally also, they couldn't be more unalike. So it is correct to conclude that ethnic diversity in Israel is great.

Israel was created as a Jewish state. Her laws and court system are secular in keeping with the diversity of religion, culture, and ethnicity. Halachic laws apply only to the ultra-religious mostly on religious matters but are superseded when in conflict with the secular law.

Money is just another tool in the battle for power and for subjugation; it can't be a true bottom line. Do not forget, FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can't be created in such a way.

FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can’t be created in such a way.

I don’t know Mr. Shamir.. I suspect that being able to create as much money as you can imagine, and spread it all around strategically, can have a significant effect on being able to amass and wield sheer, raw power as well.

Look at just what Soros has wrought, and he’s only a dime player compared to Rothschild with his counterfeiting machine, with which he can send trillion$ to hot spots the world over.

one of my strongly felt positions is that we humans should not continue to over-populate and wipe out all the ecology and wildlife on this planet. There are a lot of people that agree. And so a few of them at the Sierra Club realized that most of the numbers of exponentially increasing humans in N. America were coming from S. America as immigrants, and so they considered lobbying to halt this devastating influx of people. And then on cue, a ((man)) with a lot of money sent them a hundred million dollar check on the promise that they never again mention immigration. He liked that America was being transformed, and used his money to effect policy. Money = power, at least in many instances.

I suspect that if we could end the Fed, in a generation or two, we’d get back our Senate and even some media- who knows, perhaps eventually even control of our destiny.

Ending the Feds is a great goal, but, if I was given license by our government to print dollars, and you told me what you want, I would be enraged as my source of power would be taken away, and that power helps me to implement huge secretive agenda. If some little guy insult a mafia boss for example, he never live to see another day. Hence, the subject of the Feds is a taboo subject in America.

Sep 11, 2011 General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned – Seven Countries In Five Years

“This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”

You start out with, "Rather than focusing on religious affiliation, Sam, it may be more insightful to examine the demographics by ethnic groups "; then, having dug out ethnicities at great length in each of the states mentioned, proceed to declare in the end "...Israel would be virtually 100% Jewish.". That's a systemwide breakdown in argumentation.

[I had once given people on this webzine a sense of the incredible diversity of ethnicities, not religious affiliations in Israel, and someone scoffed at it claiming those ethnicities are irrelevant. So it appears that for those such as yourself, geokat, Jewish religiosity, and ethnicity are separable only when it suits your point of view, which, as we just witnessed, is fraught with glaring internal inconsistencies.]

That’s a systemwide breakdown in argumentation.

Ok, Sam. Why don’t you try providing us with the breakdown of ethnic groups in Israel without using the term Jewish?

Wiki:

The Jews, also known as the Jewish people, are an ethnoreligious group originating from the Israelites, or Hebrews, of the Ancient Near East. Jewish ethnicity, nationhood and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation, while its observance varies from strict observance to complete nonobservance.

[Ok, Sam. Why don’t you try providing us with the breakdown of ethnic groups in Israel without using the term Jewish?]

You introduced ethnicity in the discussion, saying "Rather than focusing on religious affiliation, Sam, it may be more insightful to examine the demographics by ethnic groups".

And now, you want to fuse them back together to suit your need for a barely sustainable argument. The answer to your query on the various ethnicities of Israel is already present in the Wiki link you provided. At least 23 nations are represented. [While on this subject one might honour through formal recognition, a tradition observed by the Judeophilic cognoscenti: I speak of the practice of rejecting or using Wiki quite as fluidly as it detracts or suits their current purpose. Bravo, to peculiar habits!]

I think it's a fair to say that the religious affiliations of ethnicities in the countries we noted are skewed in favour of one religion or another. Thus one might not be wrong in claiming that Australia has a majority Christian or erstwhile-Christian population, Ditto Europe including Russia, North America and South America, while India is Hindu. In each state, religious minorities exist without being especially remarked upon, while the polity and majority are certainly not called upon to overturn their religious demographics through immigration!

Yet you and others including our esteemed author, would have Israel, the lone Jewish majority state, perform that very act!

If violent Muslims come to the West and attack Christians, it will only strengthen Christianity

Christianity is already effectively dead. You can't strengthen a corpse. The West is well and truly post-Christian. Europeans and Americans don't care if Christianity is persecuted because Christianity is irrelevant to them.

The things that are relevant to modern Europeans and Americans are the really important things, the core values of our civilisation - shopping, virtue-signalling and porn.

Christianity is already effectively dead.

Your proof?

The West is well and truly post-Christian. Europeans and Americans don’t care if Christianity is persecuted because Christianity is irrelevant to them.

Christianity don’t have a terretial “home”. To claim otherwise is to commit a sin of phyloteism. Or are you equating the whole world with “The West”?

I strongly believe that Christians must abandon any romantic attachment to Western culture (especially in its modern form) and stand resolutely against it.
Christianity has no homeland on Earth.

America was never Christian.

Sure, there was a time when the number of Christians in America was much greater, and they took their faith much more seriously. Yes. But “America”, as a country or as a culture, was never in itself Christian. The dominant cultural values in America (individualism, commercialism, competitiveness) have always been opposed to Christian values.

The things that are relevant to modern Europeans and Americans are the really important things, the core values of our civilisation – shopping, virtue-signalling and porn.

Humans were always base, imperfect creatures. Besides, the influence of Christianity on Western culture is vastly overrated. Or are you saying that in the Middle Ages Europeans:

a) behaved in a more Christian manner than people from other cultures?

b) Helped their neighbors more, gave more money to the poor (relative to their wealth) and took better care of the sick and dying?

c) Fought fewer wars and were they less inclined to conquest and plunder and exploitation?

d) Were more faithful to their spouses and had fewer instances of sexual immorality?

No, no, not at all. In fact, in many of these respects, Western culture is demonstrably worse than any others. From the 16th to the 20th century Western culture was the #1 purveyor of war, conquest and genocide across the planet, and since the 20th century is has become the #1 purveyor of sexual immorality.

Sam, there is one confusion in your presentation: you do not distinguish native and imported Muslims. In Russia or Palestine, or India, Muslims are natives. Hundred years ago, in what today is Israel, Muslims were 90 p.c. So it has no connection to the Muslim immigration. Jews expelled hundreds of thousands Muslims and Christians from their homes. And they did not allow any back, let alone allowing any Muslim immigration. Do you understand the difference?

I am not confused Israel, merely astonished by the blatant inconsistencies which people engage in when immigration into Israel is the subject of discussion.

You know the history as well as I do, perhaps better; what remains as fact is the universality of atrocities committed while nation-states are under formation. In this regard Israel is not unique; one might even observe that while the exodus of Palestinian Arabs was every bit as tragic as population exoduses go, it may have been more so on account of the exhortations of Arab leaders to vacate remote areas mistakenly understood by the community as a call for full-scale evacuation. One might further observe, that as formations of nation-states go, the creation of Israel was based on far sounder principles of historical claim and international agreement – and I write this, acutely aware of the controversy prevailing upon that subject. Still, I stand behind that position.

I stand behind it, for if ‘hundreds-of-years’ is a measure of nativity, surely thousands of years are more so; and ‘Ashkenazi’ is merely the creation of a time-scale which stands in deference to a far more ancient one. Genetics confirm that view. By that standard, a true Palestinian Levantine, Muslim or Christian, has a sanguinary claim to the very same; but not the numerous latter-day ‘Palestinians’ which are Arabs from Saudi, Egypt, Libya, Syria etc. looking for an EZ Pass into Israel. The RoR as it has devolved into today is a transparent sleight of hand to deluge the demographics of Israel. On a related topic, the Palestinian leadership has precious little wish to resolve matters and share a general prosperity with their people, threatening the RoR as a negotiating tool, which they know to be impossible for the State to accept thus prolonging their own positions of privilege and grievance mining.

... one might even observe that while the exodus of Palestinian Arabs was every bit as tragic as population exoduses go, it may have been more so on account of the exhortations of Arab leaders to vacate remote areas mistakenly understood by the community as a call for full-scale evacuation.

Sam, with your 204 IQ, I would have thought you were above trotting out these thoroughly debunked Zionist talking points:

"In this building [the Red House], on a cold Wednesday afiemoon, 10 March 1948, a group of eleven men, veteran Zionist leaders together with young military Jewish officers, put the final touches to a plan for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. That same evening, military orders were dispatched to the units on the ground to prepare for the systematic expulsion of the Palestinians from vast areas of the country. The orders came with a detailed description of the methods to be employed to forcibly evict the people: large-scale intimidation; laying siege to and borrbarding villages and population centres; setting fire to homes, properties and goods; expulsion; demolition; and, finally, planting mines among the rubble to prevent any of the expelled inhabitants from returning." - excerpt from Ilan Pappe's, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine

Israel is no "state". It's an entity based on a cult. You say you got the DNA of the Prophets in your veins. So what? Doesn't entitle you take another's country. Neither does having suffered. As Lenin said(Israel Shamir, told me this), the solution to the Jewish problem is for Jews to assimilate. Now's your chance.

I think its useful to understand the source of Jewish strength and European weakness.

Jews operate from a standpoint of "certainty" - Europeans from a position of "questioning". The Jew knows exactly "who" he is and pursues clear materialistic goals - the European puts his faith in a process of "discovery". He has a fluid identity.

For Jews, factionalism is at the core of life - a people that "dwells apart" - life is a war between factions, and survival is the goal.

This is an immensely strong position from which to conduct one's life - a firm foundation, a clear path, unquestioned assumptions - all that's left is the implementation, tactics, strategies. Your strength is not diverted by futile questions of identity or ultimate ends.

The European approach to life leads to world changing discovery, science, and technology, while the Jewish approach is a fantastic starting point from which to acquire power and wealth.

However "noble" the European approach may be, it makes one vulnerable to people whose goals aren't similarly "high minded". Stargazing may be a fine and noble activity, but the thief can steal in and leave with the furniture.

To some extent, this sketch characterizes Europeans peculiar vulnerability to Asians and Muslims as well, people who know who they are and have clear goals.

The dilemna facing Europeans is acute - to cease being vulnerable, Europeans must end their peculiar project of fluid discovery as a way of life and acquire a clear and stable identity, but doing so would end the peculiar European ability to invent new technologies. In other words, to grow stronger Europeans would have to grow weaker. A paradox few are willing to face. Europeans would have to become a "normal" people, but are secretly proud of their exceptionalism.

In the end Jews are trapped in their own mind systems, and are as much victims of it as they are victimizers of others. Jews live Hobbesian, animalistic lives, and are obsessed with issues of personal adequacy and ego. Not fun.

“Jews live Hobbesian, animalistic lives, and are obsessed with issues of personal adequacy and ego.” – This strategy (conscious or not) only works while they live as a minority among a host society. Let them be Hobbesian and animalistic but among themselves. But they really do not want to do it. It took Holocaust to create Israel. Prior to it Zionists had no support among Jews.

I am not confused Israel, merely astonished by the blatant inconsistencies which people engage in when immigration into Israel is the subject of discussion.

You know the history as well as I do, perhaps better; what remains as fact is the universality of atrocities committed while nation-states are under formation. In this regard Israel is not unique; one might even observe that while the exodus of Palestinian Arabs was every bit as tragic as population exoduses go, it may have been more so on account of the exhortations of Arab leaders to vacate remote areas mistakenly understood by the community as a call for full-scale evacuation. One might further observe, that as formations of nation-states go, the creation of Israel was based on far sounder principles of historical claim and international agreement - and I write this, acutely aware of the controversy prevailing upon that subject. Still, I stand behind that position.

I stand behind it, for if 'hundreds-of-years' is a measure of nativity, surely thousands of years are more so; and 'Ashkenazi' is merely the creation of a time-scale which stands in deference to a far more ancient one. Genetics confirm that view. By that standard, a true Palestinian Levantine, Muslim or Christian, has a sanguinary claim to the very same; but not the numerous latter-day 'Palestinians' which are Arabs from Saudi, Egypt, Libya, Syria etc. looking for an EZ Pass into Israel. The RoR as it has devolved into today is a transparent sleight of hand to deluge the demographics of Israel. On a related topic, the Palestinian leadership has precious little wish to resolve matters and share a general prosperity with their people, threatening the RoR as a negotiating tool, which they know to be impossible for the State to accept thus prolonging their own positions of privilege and grievance mining.

… one might even observe that while the exodus of Palestinian Arabs was every bit as tragic as population exoduses go, it may have been more so on account of the exhortations of Arab leaders to vacate remote areas mistakenly understood by the community as a call for full-scale evacuation.

Sam, with your 204 IQ, I would have thought you were above trotting out these thoroughly debunked Zionist talking points:

“In this building [the Red House], on a cold Wednesday afiemoon, 10 March 1948, a group of eleven men, veteran Zionist leaders together with young military Jewish officers, put the final touches to a plan for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. That same evening, military orders were dispatched to the units on the ground to prepare for the systematic expulsion of the Palestinians from vast areas of the country. The orders came with a detailed description of the methods to be employed to forcibly evict the people: large-scale intimidation; laying siege to and borrbarding villages and population centres; setting fire to homes, properties and goods; expulsion; demolition; and, finally, planting mines among the rubble to prevent any of the expelled inhabitants from returning.” – excerpt from Ilan Pappe’s, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine

Ok, Sam. Why don't you try providing us with the breakdown of ethnic groups in Israel without using the term Jewish?

Wiki:

The Jews, also known as the Jewish people, are an ethnoreligious group originating from the Israelites, or Hebrews, of the Ancient Near East. Jewish ethnicity, nationhood and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation, while its observance varies from strict observance to complete nonobservance.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews

btw - I didn't create the ethnic group categories for Israel, I retrieved them from this wilki entry:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel

[Ok, Sam. Why don’t you try providing us with the breakdown of ethnic groups in Israel without using the term Jewish?]

You introduced ethnicity in the discussion, saying “Rather than focusing on religious affiliation, Sam, it may be more insightful to examine the demographics by ethnic groups”.

And now, you want to fuse them back together to suit your need for a barely sustainable argument. The answer to your query on the various ethnicities of Israel is already present in the Wiki link you provided. At least 23 nations are represented. [While on this subject one might honour through formal recognition, a tradition observed by the Judeophilic cognoscenti: I speak of the practice of rejecting or using Wiki quite as fluidly as it detracts or suits their current purpose. Bravo, to peculiar habits!]

I think it’s a fair to say that the religious affiliations of ethnicities in the countries we noted are skewed in favour of one religion or another. Thus one might not be wrong in claiming that Australia has a majority Christian or erstwhile-Christian population, Ditto Europe including Russia, North America and South America, while India is Hindu. In each state, religious minorities exist without being especially remarked upon, while the polity and majority are certainly not called upon to overturn their religious demographics through immigration!

Yet you and others including our esteemed author, would have Israel, the lone Jewish majority state, perform that very act!

The answer to your query on the various ethnicities of Israel is already present in the Wiki link you provided. At least 23 nations are represented.

Nice try, Sam. But what you failed to mention is that the 23 nations are related to the paternal lineage of the Jewish population of Israel - i.e., 63% of the Jewish population have fathers that were born outside of Israel and 37% have fathers born in Israel.

Not quite apples to apples in comparison with the other countries... so keep trying.

Mr. Shamir, you may know Christian theology and history well, but you do not know or, most probably, pretend not to know Muslim theology and the history of Islam. Islam per se is anti-Christian, you must know what early Christians thought of Muslims and Muhammad – the former called pagans at best and the latter referred literally as the Anti-Christ – they seemed to be wrong, the End of the World didn’t happen back then, but are they now? Islam has declared Christians its enemies from its very start. What the modern Islamists (really a very good name for them) do is returning to the original state of Islam as it was under Muhammad and the first caliphs, nothing more, nothing less.

they co-existed for millennia with their Christian neighbours.

Ever heard of “The Treaty of Umar”? Dhimmis? Are you aware what the Sharia law thinks of non-Muslims?

In Palestine, Christians and Muslims lived together and suffered together under the Jewish yoke.

Are you serious? The Jewish yoke in the Caliphate? This must be a joke!

But recently a new wind has blown in the Muslim faith, the wind of a very strong rejection of whatever is not strict Sunni Islam of the ISIS brand.

This wind had been blowing for more than a thousand years, until Islam was spoiled by the West (started with the westernization of Ottoman Turkey of the 19th century). Now it is returning to its original state. This is what Islamism is all about – go to the roots. Islamism is Islamic Protestantism.

The Muslims are being used as silent partners in the Jewish war on the Church. Instead of saying: “We, Jews, do not want to hear church bells, see Christmas scenes and hear Christian blessings”, these modest and retiring people usually refer to Muslims. Muslims do not want to hear church bells and see Christmas trees, they say.
It doesn’t matter that normally Muslims do not object to Christmas celebrations, as we know from our experience in Palestine.

Ever heard church bells in Saudi Arabia? Oh, wait, do you mean the Saudis are crypto-Jews? Al-Wahhab was a rabbi, you think?

Overall, your problem is that what you constantly refer to as “good” Islam, which treats Christianity fair, is not in fact Islam, but its spoiled weakened manifestation, which could have existed only under the Western domination of the past 200 or so years; and your “good” Muslims, who are, of course, millions, do not follow the Islamic teachings and strictly speaking they are munafiks (hypocrites) and murtads (apostates). So your best Muslim friends and neighbors, very secularized, born and/or living in the West, are not good and true examples of Islam and Muslims. Strictly speaking the best if not the only solution to the Islamic problem is to exterminate Islam altogether. Not Muslims, I underline, they are just deluded people which must be subjected to anything but secularization and de-Islamization. A soft version of Islam may remain, though, as a cultural heritage mainly; a good example of a normal Islamic country is Tatarstan of Russia, where they do not take Islam very seriously.

[Ok, Sam. Why don’t you try providing us with the breakdown of ethnic groups in Israel without using the term Jewish?]

You introduced ethnicity in the discussion, saying "Rather than focusing on religious affiliation, Sam, it may be more insightful to examine the demographics by ethnic groups".

And now, you want to fuse them back together to suit your need for a barely sustainable argument. The answer to your query on the various ethnicities of Israel is already present in the Wiki link you provided. At least 23 nations are represented. [While on this subject one might honour through formal recognition, a tradition observed by the Judeophilic cognoscenti: I speak of the practice of rejecting or using Wiki quite as fluidly as it detracts or suits their current purpose. Bravo, to peculiar habits!]

I think it's a fair to say that the religious affiliations of ethnicities in the countries we noted are skewed in favour of one religion or another. Thus one might not be wrong in claiming that Australia has a majority Christian or erstwhile-Christian population, Ditto Europe including Russia, North America and South America, while India is Hindu. In each state, religious minorities exist without being especially remarked upon, while the polity and majority are certainly not called upon to overturn their religious demographics through immigration!

Yet you and others including our esteemed author, would have Israel, the lone Jewish majority state, perform that very act!

The answer to your query on the various ethnicities of Israel is already present in the Wiki link you provided. At least 23 nations are represented.

Nice try, Sam. But what you failed to mention is that the 23 nations are related to the paternal lineage of the Jewish population of Israel – i.e., 63% of the Jewish population have fathers that were born outside of Israel and 37% have fathers born in Israel.

Not quite apples to apples in comparison with the other countries… so keep trying.

Not quite apples to apples in comparison with the other countries… so keep trying.

After giving this a little more thought, I suddenly realized that I've been viewing the issue of immigration from a goy's perspective. What drove this point home for me was the ethnic stats for Israel I cited above. Sam pointed out that there are representatives from 23 countries living in Eratz Israel. And I pointed out that those stats were related to paternal lineage. That's when the penny dropped: many Westerners are obsessed with demographic-changing levels of immigration into Western countries because they would like to retain their Western identity (their culture, their institutions, their history). But if you look at it from the Zionist perspective, the distinction between Western, Eastern, Northern, Southern is meaningless. The key distinction for them is that between Jews and Goyim, period. That's why Zionists find it so easy to advocate for a Jewish-only state for Israel while at the same time 1,500+ rabbis call for the US to open their doors to refugees from the 4 corners of the world.

Here is a quick summary of the exchange between Richard Spencer and a rabbi:

Rabbi – “My tradition teaches a message of radical inclusion and love. Will you sit down and learn Torah with me, and learn love?”

Spencer – “Do you really want radical inclusion into the State of Israel? And by that I mean radical inclusion. Maybe all of the Middle East could go move in to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Would you really want that?”

Rosenberg was silent.

Spencer – “You’re not answering,”

Rabbi – “I’m not answering,”

Spencer – “Jews exist precisely because you did not assimilate,” Spencer went on. “That is why Jews are a coherent people with a history and a culture and a future. It’s because you had a sense of yourselves. I respect that about you. I want my people to have that same sense of themselves.”

http://mondoweiss.net/2016/12/losing-debate-israel/

It also helps explain this quote by Eliot Abrams, who is rumored to be the number two man in the DOS:

Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart – except in Israel – from the rest of the population

Sep 11, 2011 General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned - Seven Countries In Five Years

"This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." I said, "Is it classified?" He said, "Yes, sir." I said, "Well, don't show it to me." And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, "You remember that?" He said, "Sir, I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you!"

https://youtu.be/9RC1Mepk_Sw

and again….

A better version: towards the end, Gen. Clark recalls that

in 1991, right after 1st Gulf War, Paul Wolfowitz told him that the US should move quickly (within 5 years) to regime-change former Soviet allies (“7 countries”) in ME.

The answer to your query on the various ethnicities of Israel is already present in the Wiki link you provided. At least 23 nations are represented.

Nice try, Sam. But what you failed to mention is that the 23 nations are related to the paternal lineage of the Jewish population of Israel - i.e., 63% of the Jewish population have fathers that were born outside of Israel and 37% have fathers born in Israel.

Not quite apples to apples in comparison with the other countries... so keep trying.

Not quite apples to apples in comparison with the other countries… so keep trying.

After giving this a little more thought, I suddenly realized that I’ve been viewing the issue of immigration from a goy’s perspective. What drove this point home for me was the ethnic stats for Israel I cited above. Sam pointed out that there are representatives from 23 countries living in Eratz Israel. And I pointed out that those stats were related to paternal lineage. That’s when the penny dropped: many Westerners are obsessed with demographic-changing levels of immigration into Western countries because they would like to retain their Western identity (their culture, their institutions, their history). But if you look at it from the Zionist perspective, the distinction between Western, Eastern, Northern, Southern is meaningless. The key distinction for them is that between Jews and Goyim, period. That’s why Zionists find it so easy to advocate for a Jewish-only state for Israel while at the same time 1,500+ rabbis call for the US to open their doors to refugees from the 4 corners of the world.

Here is a quick summary of the exchange between Richard Spencer and a rabbi:

Rabbi – “My tradition teaches a message of radical inclusion and love. Will you sit down and learn Torah with me, and learn love?”

Spencer – “Do you really want radical inclusion into the State of Israel? And by that I mean radical inclusion. Maybe all of the Middle East could go move in to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Would you really want that?”

Rosenberg was silent.

Spencer – “You’re not answering,”

Rabbi – “I’m not answering,”

Spencer – “Jews exist precisely because you did not assimilate,” Spencer went on. “That is why Jews are a coherent people with a history and a culture and a future. It’s because you had a sense of yourselves. I respect that about you. I want my people to have that same sense of themselves.”

It also helps explain this quote by Eliot Abrams, who is rumored to be the number two man in the DOS:

Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart – except in Israel – from the rest of the population

That’s when the penny dropped: many Westerners are obsessed with demographic-changing levels of immigration into Western countries because they would like to retain their Western identity (their culture, their institutions, their history). But if you look at it from the Zionist perspective, the distinction between Western, Eastern, Northern, Southern is meaningless. The key distinction for them is that between Jews and Goyim, period. That’s why Zionists find it so easy to advocate for a Jewish-only state for Israel while at the same time 1,500+ rabbis call for the US to open their doors to refugees from the 4 corners of the world.

I always like backing-up my assertions with supporting evidence, especially when it's furnished by leading members of The Lobby:

“America’s pluralistic society is at the heart of Jewish security,” says Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League – a leading Jewish-Zionist organization. “In the long run,” he continues, “what has made American Jewish life a uniquely positive experience in Diaspora history and which has enabled us to be such important allies for the State of Israel, is the health of a pluralistic, tolerant and inclusive American society.”

One of my Orthodox Jewish friends from way back - on the surface, one of the sweetest guys you could meet - who loves to vacation in Europe, when I mentioned how crazy the situation in Europe was regarding Muslim immigration, his face contorted with rage and he said "Good! Now they will fight each other and destroy each other!". I was shocked, as he had just told me how he can't wait to return to Europe.

When I once tried talking to him about Jewish mischief, he insists that everyone all does the same things and is in fact much worse. He really believes that, too.

Such is the depth of feeling and the incredible myopia we are dealing with here. What the end of it all will be for Jews, I shudder to think. One of the imperatives of narcissism is that you never self-reflect and always project outward.

What is finally happening, however, is Jewish tactics are becoming "mainstreamed" - Trump is just Jewish tactics , and the whole retarded PUA movement was created by Jews, as you'd expect - and the unprecedented information-dispersing force of the internet is taking things out of the shadows and exposing them to sunlight in a way that never happened before.

Jews wished to be a moral light unto the nations - instead their most enduring legacy will be amoral power tactics becoming mainstreamed and sociopathic social relations between men and women. But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. "Weak" China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

Aaron B -

Thanks for a most enlightening post !

I must say – as a Gentile, and a lifelong admirer of the Jewish Genius (which has brought SO much to the table, in terms of European Culture) – I fear for the future of the Jewish People, wherever they may reside, if they do not start soon to acknowledge OPENLY the existence of a Jewish Mafia (IMMENSELY wealthy, powerful, and influential) which has brought SO much suffering to the World (Jews included)……………….and begin to speak out AGAINST it (“Not in OUR name” etc etc).

And they ALSO need to drop what seems to be an almost REFLEXIVE “Next year in Jerusalem” sentimentality about Israel – WHATEVER crimes it perpetrates.

In short, the Jewish People need – as a matter of urgency, I feel – to use their Collective Intelligence (something with which they have been most GENEROUSLY endowed by God/Life/The Universe) to the Greater Good – not only of themselves, but of the whole of Humanity.

This court case about Trump's order is absurd.
Judges want "evidence" about the terrorist activities of the 7 affected countries.
It would be as if the day before D-Day, judges wanted evidence whether it was a good tactical idea or not.
The foreign policy of US is being run by an unelected District Court judge in Seattle?!
Jurisprudence and the judiciary in this country are moribund.
Even Dershowitz says Trump can just ignore the stay.
Coequal branches.
Maybe now is the time to have this fight, though Trump has a lot on his plate .

The Seattle District Judge has entered his order; now let him enforce it.

Why do Jews support the Muslim migration of from Middle East to western countries?

Jews try to save Israel whose possibilities of survival in a hostile Arab surrounding are not looking too good. The Arab country with the best economic development in the last thirty years, thus becoming more and more a danger to Israel in its neighborhood, was Syria. Israelis had an enormous interest to destroy it. That is why Israel is strongly supporting the ongoing war of the West against Syria.

During the cold war, the immigration of dissidents from the eastern block into western Europe helped to destroy the communist block. It was often the best and brightest who decided to leave their homes in the eastern block thus weakening this block. The West is now using the same system against the Arabs. They try to weaken Syria using the same instruments they used against the communists, that is the Geneva Refugee Convention and the UNHCR. Jews support this policy because it strengthens the position of Israel in the Middle East. The people they want to convince to leave Syria are the gifted students, the entrepreneurs, the excellent doctors and teachers of Syria. Only if great numbers of Arabs, be they Christians or Muslims or of any other belief, leave the Middle East, Israel can survive.

“The people they want to convince to leave Syria are the gifted students, the entrepreneurs, the excellent doctors and teachers of Syria. Only if great numbers of Arabs, be they Christians or Muslims or of any other belief, leave the Middle East, Israel can survive.”

You nailed it. That is exactly why there is such a push for refugees. I am not a person who opposes immigration, I believe if there is a country willing and people willing to, then it is fine as long as it is done by the correct and established means of the receiving country. But I am also not fool enough to see that these refugees, bombed and slaughtered at home, are being used as a weapon in a much larger game (if they know it or not).

The ones who flee war zones are usually the ones with the means to do so. And that usually means the educated, and often wealthy, class. I can tell you from very close experience that Syria experienced an economic boom when the rest of the world was was suffering in 2008. This was entirely due to the Iraqi influx that began in 2003. Who were those Iraqis? Mostly well off, highly educated, refugees who transferred their money and business to Syria. By 2008 they were well established and were approximately 10% of the population. I don’t mention this to say that this is what will happen wherever refugees go, I’m using this to illustrate that the people that a society really need to keep it afloat are the first ones to leave during times of strife. Because they have the means. And someone certainly wants all of these people to leave their homes in the Arab countries.

But history advances by irony. The West with its worship of power turns out to be brittle at its core. “Weak” China endures for millenia. Everything is really its opposite.

Part of that irony must be the crowd that, by dint of knowledge no other part of the world but the West would have ever produced, means technology no-one else would have ever invented, strong of sets of ideas and a vision that no other culture would have ever imagined, has realized the West's inferiority.

And, via an electronic device that would have never existed (or maybe only some thousands years afterwards), through the technology of the Internet, they spread their wisdom.

You may say that without the West everybody would have been prevented from realizing how ugly the West were :) .

sociopathic social relations between men and women

This is the first time I see the psychological category of sociology applied to the relations between the two sexes.I am not saying I disagree, I am saying I struggle to apprehend what you do mean.In the evolutionary battle of life, males and females play the role of rivals. Obviously, submission of one side extinguishes conflict (for example in the most socially advanced countries of the West, the war of the sexes is currently paused: males have submitted themselves). Otherwise, there is fighting, by various means: I guess this is what you call sociopathy, but I am unsure.

Men and women are not “rivals” at all when it comes to perpetuating one’s family/genes and one’s nation. That’s part of the twisted thinking that Soros et al. have used to split men from women in an unnatural way.

Brilliant article, yet Trump dissed Jews when he nominated an Episcopalian to the Supreme Court! He would be the only Protestant, from my blog:

Oct 3, 2010 - No Protestants on the Supreme Court

I like to comment on interesting issues that never appear in our corporate media. Racial diversity is a major topic, but religious diversity is rarely mentioned. Our nation is 51% Protestant, 25% Catholic, 2% Mormon, 2% varied Christian sects, 2% Jewish, 1% Muslim, 2% others, and 15% of Americans identify themselves as non-religious or not affiliated. As of 1994, the Supreme Court had five Protestant justices, two Catholics, and two Jews. Over the years, retiring Protestant judges were replaced only with Catholics and Jews, so today the nine-member court consists of six Catholics and three Jews, without a single Protestant!

I doubt this is an evil conspiracy, but our media never mentions this, and with all the effort at diversity, one might think the Protestant majority should have at least one seat on the Supreme Court, or perhaps a proportional representation of five seats. One might think President Obama is more sensitive to diversity, yet he replaced the last two retiring Protestants with a Catholic and a Jew. One might think that national leaders realized: "Gee, this looks awkward." Apparently, the corporate media agrees, so they ignore the issue. I don't think this is a conspiracy since all were nominated by Protestant Presidents, but it's undemocratic.
_______________

Fast forward to 2016 when much news was made about Obama's Supreme Court nomination that was stalled by Republicans, but no one mentioned it was yet another Jew! I have no problem with Jewish people or Catholics and have many friends, but the lack of diversity on our Supreme Court is stunning, and never mentioned by our corporate media. Yet most Jews are now furious that Trump nominated a Protestant.

Appreciate and share your sentiments. Just let’s not call Barrack Hussein-Obama a “Protestant” president. He is no Christian and appears, in addition, to sympathize with and relate to Islam more respectfully and affectionately.

To be sure, our other recent presidents have been generally bad or amoral men pretending to be Christians and perhaps believing/rationalizing themselves to be in some general sense.

By contrast, Hussein-Obama is the first who might actually be an adherent of a religion that is both alien and fundamentally hostile to the West and Christians.

Not quite apples to apples in comparison with the other countries… so keep trying.

After giving this a little more thought, I suddenly realized that I've been viewing the issue of immigration from a goy's perspective. What drove this point home for me was the ethnic stats for Israel I cited above. Sam pointed out that there are representatives from 23 countries living in Eratz Israel. And I pointed out that those stats were related to paternal lineage. That's when the penny dropped: many Westerners are obsessed with demographic-changing levels of immigration into Western countries because they would like to retain their Western identity (their culture, their institutions, their history). But if you look at it from the Zionist perspective, the distinction between Western, Eastern, Northern, Southern is meaningless. The key distinction for them is that between Jews and Goyim, period. That's why Zionists find it so easy to advocate for a Jewish-only state for Israel while at the same time 1,500+ rabbis call for the US to open their doors to refugees from the 4 corners of the world.

Here is a quick summary of the exchange between Richard Spencer and a rabbi:

Rabbi – “My tradition teaches a message of radical inclusion and love. Will you sit down and learn Torah with me, and learn love?”

Spencer – “Do you really want radical inclusion into the State of Israel? And by that I mean radical inclusion. Maybe all of the Middle East could go move in to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Would you really want that?”

Rosenberg was silent.

Spencer – “You’re not answering,”

Rabbi – “I’m not answering,”

Spencer – “Jews exist precisely because you did not assimilate,” Spencer went on. “That is why Jews are a coherent people with a history and a culture and a future. It’s because you had a sense of yourselves. I respect that about you. I want my people to have that same sense of themselves.”

http://mondoweiss.net/2016/12/losing-debate-israel/

It also helps explain this quote by Eliot Abrams, who is rumored to be the number two man in the DOS:

Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart – except in Israel – from the rest of the population

http://mondoweiss.net/2017/02/appointing-apparatchik-position/

As they say: perspective is everything.

Once again all you’ve demonstrated is the recurring circularity in your own arguments, plainly running away from your own initial premise.

Anyone paying attention can sort it out from the preceding thread. No amount of internet mining for diversionary material will change that.

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration

You're the one who tried to make the argument that Israel is a leader in Muslim immigration by presenting stats that showed Israel having as many Muslims residing in the country as India. As if the indigenous Palestinians could be viewed as immigrants. And you have the chutzpah to accuse me of using flawed arguments?

FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can’t be created in such a way.

I don't know Mr. Shamir.. I suspect that being able to create as much money as you can imagine, and spread it all around strategically, can have a significant effect on being able to amass and wield sheer, raw power as well.

Look at just what Soros has wrought, and he's only a dime player compared to Rothschild with his counterfeiting machine, with which he can send trillion$ to hot spots the world over.

one of my strongly felt positions is that we humans should not continue to over-populate and wipe out all the ecology and wildlife on this planet. There are a lot of people that agree. And so a few of them at the Sierra Club realized that most of the numbers of exponentially increasing humans in N. America were coming from S. America as immigrants, and so they considered lobbying to halt this devastating influx of people. And then on cue, a ((man)) with a lot of money sent them a hundred million dollar check on the promise that they never again mention immigration. He liked that America was being transformed, and used his money to effect policy. Money = power, at least in many instances.

I suspect that if we could end the Fed, in a generation or two, we'd get back our Senate and even some media- who knows, perhaps eventually even control of our destiny.

Old jokes, unlike good wines, do not get better with age. Still, with Shamir’s encouragement you do manage to pour some heady new brew inside that old bottle I suppose.

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration

You’re the one who tried to make the argument that Israel is a leader in Muslim immigration by presenting stats that showed Israel having as many Muslims residing in the country as India. As if the indigenous Palestinians could be viewed as immigrants. And you have the chutzpah to accuse me of using flawed arguments?

Money is just another tool in the battle for power and for subjugation; it can't be a true bottom line. Do not forget, FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can't be created in such a way.

Wasn’t it Al Pacino in “Scarface” who (correctly) said, “First, you get the money. Then you get the power. Then, you get the broads”.

The only practical way to the immense power of the Chosen Ones is control (FRS + banksters) of the money supply. Take away that, they’re utterly powerless.

PEACE IN…
It’s now time for ALL TRIBES IN A UNITED ONE HUMAN FAMILY TO TRUTHFULLY KNOW, FULLY EXPOSE, DIRECTLY CONFRONT, AND TO FIGHT UNCOMPROMISINGLY TO TOTALLY DEFEAT AND COMPLETELY ELIMINATE “WORLD PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE” – BABYLONIAN TALMUD ZIONAZIS JEWRY – PERIOD!

President Trump is “we the people’s” chance to bring substantial change to our nation’s current critical situation. We must fight in all quarters to defend our nation from efforts to demoralize our President and to defeat our movement for freedom and liberation from evil, dominate, and controlling influence of Babylonian Talmud zionazis Jewry, at home and abroad – PERIOD!
PEACE IN…PEACE OUT…

Getting back to numbers which address the common yet misleading notion of apparent Jewish inconsistency on the matter of Muslim immigration

You're the one who tried to make the argument that Israel is a leader in Muslim immigration by presenting stats that showed Israel having as many Muslims residing in the country as India. As if the indigenous Palestinians could be viewed as immigrants. And you have the chutzpah to accuse me of using flawed arguments?

Please.

by presenting stats that showed Israel having as many Muslims residing in the country as India. As if the indigenous Palestinians could be viewed as immigrants. And you have the chutzpah …..

I had to laugh. You do like Yiddish words don’t you? And where did I show “..Israel having as many Muslims residing in the country as India.” ?????

Money is just another tool in the battle for power and for subjugation; it can't be a true bottom line. Do not forget, FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can't be created in such a way.

It’s all about opposition to the cross of Christ and His Church. Money and power are merely means.

Make Yourself An Ark! by Father Andrew O’Brien, pp.64-65:

Down through the centuries, theologians and saints of the Catholic Church found it very difficult to explain how antichrist could bring the world under his political and religious dominion. Now we know. God’s greatest punishment is chastisement, and the reign of the antichrist. Holy Scripture tells us what the antichrist does, and it includes this, “He compelled everybody, small and great, rich and poor, slave and citizen, to be branded on the right hand or on the forehead, and made it illegal for anyone to buy or sell anything unless he had been branded with the name of the beast or with the number.” (Apocalypse 13:16,17).
This, then, is the devil’s plan, to rule the whole world, and his people are almost ready to deliver it to him. The super-capitalists are in Financiers Enslave the World 31 control of global high finance, with Zionism as their nationalism, and Communism as their bulldozer to eliminate all other nationalisms.
“Taking him to a high mountain, the devil showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. ‘I will give you all these,’ he said, ‘if you fall at my feet and worship me’.” (Luke 4:8-10).
As Honore de Balzac once said, “The final battle for Christianity will be over the money problem, and until that is solved there can be no universal application of Christianity.”

The revolutionary change in the realm of high finance calls for a corresponding revolutionary change in the realm of politics, since a fully internationalized high finance cannot coexist in harmony with innumerable national concentrations of political power. The seizing of all wealth and political power on a global scale must also of necessity include control of all mankind through conditioning and manipulation of the mind and spirit of human beings…

Most of us characterize "Jewishness" as an ethnicity, which it is in the U.S. It may not be in Israel.

Nevertheless, isn't Israel a secular state? I'm also surprised there isn't a significant percentage of atheists; if geokat's are government figures it appears the government does treat "Jewishness" as a race/ethnicity.

Jewishness is in some sense, perhaps even genetically, an ethnicity. It’s clearly a faith, one which has relatively few adherents, and a history replete with events which tend to impart [at least to many Ashkenazis] that unmistakable character marked by eccentric nervousness [Woody Allen?]. You won’t find that among Mizrachis [Moroccans, Yemenis, Iraquis etc] . Being a non-proselytising religion it stands to reason the observed genetic similarities found among the phenotype distributions.

If you visit Israel you’ll be struck by the phenotypical variations. Ashkenazim look very different from the Mizrachim. Culturally also, they couldn’t be more unalike. So it is correct to conclude that ethnic diversity in Israel is great.

Israel was created as a Jewish state. Her laws and court system are secular in keeping with the diversity of religion, culture, and ethnicity. Halachic laws apply only to the ultra-religious mostly on religious matters but are superseded when in conflict with the secular law.

Sorry old chap, but was the Canadian ale going down a bit too smoothly last evening?

Nice try, Sam. While your little table features relative figures to play up the signifance of Muslims in Israel, you now choose to emphasize the absolute numbers to wriggle out of your conundrum?

I may not have a Phd in Mathematical Economics, Sam, but I do know the difference b/w absolute and relative numbers. But I almost forgot, you think that since I have a goyisher kop, I must struggle with basic arithmetic.

Speaking of goyisher kop, I never did see you respond to my comment about the meaning of certain Yiddish terms. I wonder why, notwithstanding the fact that I may misspell them from time to time.

Sorry old chap, but was the Canadian ale going down a bit too smoothly last evening?

Nice try, Sam. While your little table features relative figures to play up the significance of Muslims in Israel, you now choose to emphasize the absolute numbers to wriggle out of your conundrum?

I may not have a Phd in Mathematical Economics, Sam, but I do know the difference b/w absolute and relative numbers. But I almost forgot, you think that since I have a goyisher kop, I must struggle with basic arithmetic.

Speaking of goyisher kop, I never did see you respond to my comment about the meaning of certain Yiddish terms, notwithstanding the fact that I may misspell them from time to time. I wonder why.

Um, let's see; the population of India, Geo, is something like 1.2 b and that of Israel is 8m. So 18% of 1.2 b =? 18% of 8m. in your new method for calculating proportions?

Sorry old chap, but was the Canadian ale going down a bit too smoothly last evening?

Sorry old chap, but was the Canadian ale going down a bit too smoothly last evening?

Nice try, Sam. While your little table features relative figures to play up the signifance of Muslims in Israel, you now choose to emphasize the absolute numbers to wriggle out of your conundrum?

I may not have a Phd in Mathematical Economics, Sam, but I do know the difference b/w absolute and relative numbers. But I almost forgot, you think that since I have a goyisher kop, I must struggle with basic arithmetic.

Speaking of goyisher kop, I never did see you respond to my comment about the meaning of certain Yiddish terms. I wonder why, notwithstanding the fact that I may misspell them from time to time.

Um, let's see; the population of India, Geo, is something like 1.2 b and that of Israel is 8m. So 18% of 1.2 b =? 18% of 8m. in your new method for calculating proportions?

Sorry old chap, but was the Canadian ale going down a bit too smoothly last evening?

Sorry old chap, but was the Canadian ale going down a bit too smoothly last evening?

Nice try, Sam. While your little table features relative figures to play up the significance of Muslims in Israel, you now choose to emphasize the absolute numbers to wriggle out of your conundrum?

I may not have a Phd in Mathematical Economics, Sam, but I do know the difference b/w absolute and relative numbers. But I almost forgot, you think that since I have a goyisher kop, I must struggle with basic arithmetic.

Speaking of goyisher kop, I never did see you respond to my comment about the meaning of certain Yiddish terms, notwithstanding the fact that I may misspell them from time to time. I wonder why.

[But I almost forgot, you think that since I have a goyisher kop, I must struggle with basic arithmetic.]

I think you are engaged in what's commonly referred to as throwing gorilla dust. Also far too self-convinced about this goyischer kopf nonsense which I've never used nor know anyone who does. It matters not anyway. Your basic arithmetic is likely better than mine these days.

I was questioning what you wrote in plain prose [in #100]

You’re the one who tried to make the argument that Israel is a leader in Muslim immigration by presenting stats that showed Israel having as many Muslims residing in the country as India.

Pray tell, what does "....as many Muslims residing in the country as India" mean in your vernacular?

Sorry old chap, but was the Canadian ale going down a bit too smoothly last evening?

Nice try, Sam. While your little table features relative figures to play up the significance of Muslims in Israel, you now choose to emphasize the absolute numbers to wriggle out of your conundrum?

I may not have a Phd in Mathematical Economics, Sam, but I do know the difference b/w absolute and relative numbers. But I almost forgot, you think that since I have a goyisher kop, I must struggle with basic arithmetic.

Speaking of goyisher kop, I never did see you respond to my comment about the meaning of certain Yiddish terms, notwithstanding the fact that I may misspell them from time to time. I wonder why.

[But I almost forgot, you think that since I have a goyisher kop, I must struggle with basic arithmetic.]

I think you are engaged in what’s commonly referred to as throwing gorilla dust. Also far too self-convinced about this goyischer kopf nonsense which I’ve never used nor know anyone who does. It matters not anyway. Your basic arithmetic is likely better than mine these days.

I was questioning what you wrote in plain prose [in #100]

You’re the one who tried to make the argument that Israel is a leader in Muslim immigration by presenting stats that showed Israel having as many Muslims residing in the country as India.

Pray tell, what does “….as many Muslims residing in the country as India” mean in your vernacular?

[But I almost forgot, you think that since I have a goyisher kop, I must struggle with basic arithmetic.]

I think you are engaged in what's commonly referred to as throwing gorilla dust. Also far too self-convinced about this goyischer kopf nonsense which I've never used nor know anyone who does. It matters not anyway. Your basic arithmetic is likely better than mine these days.

I was questioning what you wrote in plain prose [in #100]

You’re the one who tried to make the argument that Israel is a leader in Muslim immigration by presenting stats that showed Israel having as many Muslims residing in the country as India.

Pray tell, what does "....as many Muslims residing in the country as India" mean in your vernacular?

I think you are engaged in what’s commonly referred to as throwing gorilla dust.

You callin’ me a gorilla, Sam LOL

Pray tell, what does “….as many Muslims residing in the country as India” mean in your vernacular?

C’mon, Sam. You know exactly what I meant:

… based on the info you presented, Israel has “as many Muslims residing in the country as India (when expressed as a percentage of their respective populations).”

Why do Jews support the Muslim migration of from Middle East to western countries?

Jews try to save Israel whose possibilities of survival in a hostile Arab surrounding are not looking too good. The Arab country with the best economic development in the last thirty years, thus becoming more and more a danger to Israel in its neighborhood, was Syria. Israelis had an enormous interest to destroy it. That is why Israel is strongly supporting the ongoing war of the West against Syria.

During the cold war, the immigration of dissidents from the eastern block into western Europe helped to destroy the communist block. It was often the best and brightest who decided to leave their homes in the eastern block thus weakening this block. The West is now using the same system against the Arabs. They try to weaken Syria using the same instruments they used against the communists, that is the Geneva Refugee Convention and the UNHCR. Jews support this policy because it strengthens the position of Israel in the Middle East. The people they want to convince to leave Syria are the gifted students, the entrepreneurs, the excellent doctors and teachers of Syria. Only if great numbers of Arabs, be they Christians or Muslims or of any other belief, leave the Middle East, Israel can survive.

“The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.”

I am so grateful for your comments, my esteemed readers of UR! Indeed it is blessing to have so many wise readers who share of their wisdom. It is a great difference comparing with silly remarks one gets on other site. I do not respond to each comment, but I read all and store them for future reference. Thank you!

Not quite apples to apples in comparison with the other countries… so keep trying.

After giving this a little more thought, I suddenly realized that I've been viewing the issue of immigration from a goy's perspective. What drove this point home for me was the ethnic stats for Israel I cited above. Sam pointed out that there are representatives from 23 countries living in Eratz Israel. And I pointed out that those stats were related to paternal lineage. That's when the penny dropped: many Westerners are obsessed with demographic-changing levels of immigration into Western countries because they would like to retain their Western identity (their culture, their institutions, their history). But if you look at it from the Zionist perspective, the distinction between Western, Eastern, Northern, Southern is meaningless. The key distinction for them is that between Jews and Goyim, period. That's why Zionists find it so easy to advocate for a Jewish-only state for Israel while at the same time 1,500+ rabbis call for the US to open their doors to refugees from the 4 corners of the world.

Here is a quick summary of the exchange between Richard Spencer and a rabbi:

Rabbi – “My tradition teaches a message of radical inclusion and love. Will you sit down and learn Torah with me, and learn love?”

Spencer – “Do you really want radical inclusion into the State of Israel? And by that I mean radical inclusion. Maybe all of the Middle East could go move in to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Would you really want that?”

Rosenberg was silent.

Spencer – “You’re not answering,”

Rabbi – “I’m not answering,”

Spencer – “Jews exist precisely because you did not assimilate,” Spencer went on. “That is why Jews are a coherent people with a history and a culture and a future. It’s because you had a sense of yourselves. I respect that about you. I want my people to have that same sense of themselves.”

http://mondoweiss.net/2016/12/losing-debate-israel/

It also helps explain this quote by Eliot Abrams, who is rumored to be the number two man in the DOS:

Outside the land of Israel, there can be no doubt that Jews, faithful to the covenant between God and Abraham, are to stand apart from the nation in which they live. It is the very nature of being Jewish to be apart – except in Israel – from the rest of the population

http://mondoweiss.net/2017/02/appointing-apparatchik-position/

As they say: perspective is everything.

That’s when the penny dropped: many Westerners are obsessed with demographic-changing levels of immigration into Western countries because they would like to retain their Western identity (their culture, their institutions, their history). But if you look at it from the Zionist perspective, the distinction between Western, Eastern, Northern, Southern is meaningless. The key distinction for them is that between Jews and Goyim, period. That’s why Zionists find it so easy to advocate for a Jewish-only state for Israel while at the same time 1,500+ rabbis call for the US to open their doors to refugees from the 4 corners of the world.

I always like backing-up my assertions with supporting evidence, especially when it’s furnished by leading members of The Lobby:

“America’s pluralistic society is at the heart of Jewish security,” says Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League – a leading Jewish-Zionist organization. “In the long run,” he continues, “what has made American Jewish life a uniquely positive experience in Diaspora history and which has enabled us to be such important allies for the State of Israel, is the health of a pluralistic, tolerant and inclusive American society.”

"I’d suggest a simple explanation. Jews want to import Muslims to fight Christ and the Church."

Maybe it's the other way around. Even though Jews feign sympathy for Muslims(at least for those OVER HERE), Jews(at least those of Zionist persuasion) certainly don't like Muslims in the Middle East(those OVER THERE).

So, if hostile Muslims are brought to the West and do harm to gentiles, then Europeans and Americans will hate Muslims and continue to support Israel(that is at war with Muslims). "We gentiles and you Jews have the common enemy: Muslims."

Of course, if Americans and Europeans had sense & courage, they'd ask, "Why should we feel sympathy for Jews who are at war with nasty Muslims when it's the Jews who've done most to bring murderous Muslims to the West and use them against us?"

But Worship of Jews is such a shibboleth of the West that such a question never crosses the mind of your average European or American dummy.

Because of media and academia brainwashing, three people are holy in the West: Jews, Negroes, and Homos.

So, Jews can pull all sorts of trick... but they will never be blamed.

Jews can accuse whites of being 'nazis' and support more immigration of Muslims into the West. But if Muslims commit violence, the first concern of whites is 'we must save Jews from Muslims'.

No wonder Jews laugh at dumb goyim.

“…nasty Muslims when it’s the Jews who’ve done most to bring murderous Muslims…”

Better to be “nasty” than evil as white Christians, and better to be “murderous,” due to provocations, than be psychopaths as white Christians, who kill for no reason but greed and self glory.

What needs to be included in the ban is Israel and Saudi Arabia..these 2 number one sponsors of terrorism in the world have attacked the US…remember 911? While sneaky Israel( the man behind the curtain) attacked and killed our navy men on the USS Liberty and they are most definitely involved in 911 along with our government and Saudi Arabia..who needs allies like this? These things are enemies not allies ..Israel always whining..shut up already ..how many refugees have you taken in??? Saudi Arabia????waiting………

"I’d suggest a simple explanation. Jews want to import Muslims to fight Christ and the Church."

Maybe it's the other way around. Even though Jews feign sympathy for Muslims(at least for those OVER HERE), Jews(at least those of Zionist persuasion) certainly don't like Muslims in the Middle East(those OVER THERE).

So, if hostile Muslims are brought to the West and do harm to gentiles, then Europeans and Americans will hate Muslims and continue to support Israel(that is at war with Muslims). "We gentiles and you Jews have the common enemy: Muslims."

Of course, if Americans and Europeans had sense & courage, they'd ask, "Why should we feel sympathy for Jews who are at war with nasty Muslims when it's the Jews who've done most to bring murderous Muslims to the West and use them against us?"

But Worship of Jews is such a shibboleth of the West that such a question never crosses the mind of your average European or American dummy.

Because of media and academia brainwashing, three people are holy in the West: Jews, Negroes, and Homos.

So, Jews can pull all sorts of trick... but they will never be blamed.

Jews can accuse whites of being 'nazis' and support more immigration of Muslims into the West. But if Muslims commit violence, the first concern of whites is 'we must save Jews from Muslims'.

No wonder Jews laugh at dumb goyim.

Should have phrased my earlier reply a little differently, having re-read the article, Mr. Shamir is making an excellent analysis.

You, former Priss, make a very good point with

the Jews who’ve done most to bring murderous Muslims to the West and use them against us?

I read much of recent Western history, it is true that Jewish people are always at the centre of initial moves to ‘multiculalism’, after they have infiltrated the propaganda throughout education, then government, then the law they can dissemble and say ‘Aw, it’s not us doing it.’ So you are correct.

Mr. Shamir has a very important point in that it is anti-Christian as a core motivation, makes several others that are very pertinent.

On a lighter note, I offer a true anecdote from abt. 15 years ago. Our government had been lax in allowing Israelis to run illegal businesses and do illegal work until about two years earlier, but there were still many around.

In the semi-rural (not so much now, but there are still a few farms within 15 min. walk of the station, five min. at the time) exurb. of Tokyo, suddenly I see, for a few weeks, posters asking us to support a Holycaust museum in the area. I thought ‘What is this nonsense?’

A nearby research centre (my workplace at times) did some Pacific War weapons work.

Fortunately, the government’s newly healthy attitude to their doing illegal work and running illegal businesses meant they were closed down, so the stupid museum never was built.

At least one of the operators married a daughter of the prefectural police chief, I don’t know what happened to him, but, if not divorced, operating between the police and yakuza (not entirely separate, depending on the place).

Perhaps, with his own racket of Israeli illegals blown, he divorced and went to another place.

I think its useful to understand the source of Jewish strength and European weakness.

Jews operate from a standpoint of "certainty" - Europeans from a position of "questioning". The Jew knows exactly "who" he is and pursues clear materialistic goals - the European puts his faith in a process of "discovery". He has a fluid identity.

For Jews, factionalism is at the core of life - a people that "dwells apart" - life is a war between factions, and survival is the goal.

This is an immensely strong position from which to conduct one's life - a firm foundation, a clear path, unquestioned assumptions - all that's left is the implementation, tactics, strategies. Your strength is not diverted by futile questions of identity or ultimate ends.

The European approach to life leads to world changing discovery, science, and technology, while the Jewish approach is a fantastic starting point from which to acquire power and wealth.

However "noble" the European approach may be, it makes one vulnerable to people whose goals aren't similarly "high minded". Stargazing may be a fine and noble activity, but the thief can steal in and leave with the furniture.

To some extent, this sketch characterizes Europeans peculiar vulnerability to Asians and Muslims as well, people who know who they are and have clear goals.

The dilemna facing Europeans is acute - to cease being vulnerable, Europeans must end their peculiar project of fluid discovery as a way of life and acquire a clear and stable identity, but doing so would end the peculiar European ability to invent new technologies. In other words, to grow stronger Europeans would have to grow weaker. A paradox few are willing to face. Europeans would have to become a "normal" people, but are secretly proud of their exceptionalism.

In the end Jews are trapped in their own mind systems, and are as much victims of it as they are victimizers of others. Jews live Hobbesian, animalistic lives, and are obsessed with issues of personal adequacy and ego. Not fun.

Thank you for such a succinct and insightful comment. You explain the European predicament perfectly!

I am not confused Israel, merely astonished by the blatant inconsistencies which people engage in when immigration into Israel is the subject of discussion.

You know the history as well as I do, perhaps better; what remains as fact is the universality of atrocities committed while nation-states are under formation. In this regard Israel is not unique; one might even observe that while the exodus of Palestinian Arabs was every bit as tragic as population exoduses go, it may have been more so on account of the exhortations of Arab leaders to vacate remote areas mistakenly understood by the community as a call for full-scale evacuation. One might further observe, that as formations of nation-states go, the creation of Israel was based on far sounder principles of historical claim and international agreement - and I write this, acutely aware of the controversy prevailing upon that subject. Still, I stand behind that position.

I stand behind it, for if 'hundreds-of-years' is a measure of nativity, surely thousands of years are more so; and 'Ashkenazi' is merely the creation of a time-scale which stands in deference to a far more ancient one. Genetics confirm that view. By that standard, a true Palestinian Levantine, Muslim or Christian, has a sanguinary claim to the very same; but not the numerous latter-day 'Palestinians' which are Arabs from Saudi, Egypt, Libya, Syria etc. looking for an EZ Pass into Israel. The RoR as it has devolved into today is a transparent sleight of hand to deluge the demographics of Israel. On a related topic, the Palestinian leadership has precious little wish to resolve matters and share a general prosperity with their people, threatening the RoR as a negotiating tool, which they know to be impossible for the State to accept thus prolonging their own positions of privilege and grievance mining.

Israel is no “state”. It’s an entity based on a cult. You say you got the DNA of the Prophets in your veins. So what? Doesn’t entitle you take another’s country. Neither does having suffered. As Lenin said(Israel Shamir, told me this), the solution to the Jewish problem is for Jews to assimilate. Now’s your chance.

Mr. Shamir and others failed to understand the ROOT cause of jewish hatred of Christians and Moslems. Go to any place where jews lived. You will never find any trace of jewish culture there. Jews lived among the heavenly marvels of Islamic art, architecture and other material culture – Islamic civilization, but never created any civilisation of their own. Exactly the same in Christian places. Jewish “art” begun only in 20th century with Chagal and the phenomenal ugliness of it all, scary, degrading, pornographic.

Jews are full of envy. That’s the explanation. They hate culture and cultures. They now embrace any other people who “create” ugliness, i. e. they embrace destroyers of civilisation. Envy. It would be an interesting journey to go further into the jewish ideology, lack of interest and lack of talent for making things, because there are even deeper roots that need to be sorted out.

What Israel Shamir (Shamir is a worm) is hiding is church pedophiles. He knows that homosexuals inside Christian churches (Catholic and Protestant) are causing church bankruptcy all over USA. Look at archdiocese in Boston and St. Paul etc. What is the cause of this? Homosexuality that Shamir and his Catholic buddy Patrick Buchanan are hiding from the rest of us straight people by attacking Jews and Israel. In fact there is a fight against homosexuality in Judaism. Traditional Jews are fighting against Homo Catholic priests and Homo dike ministers. Islam supports pedophiles secretly look at Afghanistan and the’dancing boys’ and our USA soldiers are told to look away from this homosexual and Catholic Islam. Why do you only hear Shamir and his buddy attack Jews and Israel? Because he is hiding his faggots in the Catholic church. Conservatives don’t want to turn our culture over to Homo Islam Homo Catholic priests and Homo Dike Protestant ministers. Shamir and Buchanan and Kevin (little dick) MacDonald turn everything into Jewish Israeli Settlements because they are supporting the homosexual takeover of Christendom by Homo Islam and Homo priests and Homo dike Protestant ministers and they are running cover for Homosexual takeover by attacking Jewish – Israel – Settlements while Islam Homo sympathizers like Shamir Buchanan MacDonald run the true Christian church into bankruptcy. Stop the Shamir – Buchanan – MacDonald Islam Homo conspiracy now!

What Israel Shamir (Shamir is a worm) is hiding is church pedophiles. He knows that homosexuals inside Christian churches (Catholic and Protestant) are causing church bankruptcy all over USA. Look at archdiocese in Boston and St. Paul etc. What is the cause of this? Homosexuality that Shamir and his Catholic buddy Patrick Buchanan are hiding from the rest of us straight people by attacking Jews and Israel. In fact there is a fight against homosexuality in Judaism. Traditional Jews are fighting against Homo Catholic priests and Homo dike ministers. Islam supports pedophiles secretly look at Afghanistan and the'dancing boys' and our USA soldiers are told to look away from this homosexual and Catholic Islam. Why do you only hear Shamir and his buddy attack Jews and Israel? Because he is hiding his faggots in the Catholic church. Conservatives don't want to turn our culture over to Homo Islam Homo Catholic priests and Homo Dike Protestant ministers. Shamir and Buchanan and Kevin (little dick) MacDonald turn everything into Jewish Israeli Settlements because they are supporting the homosexual takeover of Christendom by Homo Islam and Homo priests and Homo dike Protestant ministers and they are running cover for Homosexual takeover by attacking Jewish - Israel - Settlements while Islam Homo sympathizers like Shamir Buchanan MacDonald run the true Christian church into bankruptcy. Stop the Shamir - Buchanan - MacDonald Islam Homo conspiracy now!

Stop the Shamir – Buchanan – MacDonald Islam Homo conspiracy now!

I sense desperation on the part of the defenders of the indefensible. This is a good omen.

Brilliant article, yet Trump dissed Jews when he nominated an Episcopalian to the Supreme Court! He would be the only Protestant, from my blog:

Oct 3, 2010 - No Protestants on the Supreme Court

I like to comment on interesting issues that never appear in our corporate media. Racial diversity is a major topic, but religious diversity is rarely mentioned. Our nation is 51% Protestant, 25% Catholic, 2% Mormon, 2% varied Christian sects, 2% Jewish, 1% Muslim, 2% others, and 15% of Americans identify themselves as non-religious or not affiliated. As of 1994, the Supreme Court had five Protestant justices, two Catholics, and two Jews. Over the years, retiring Protestant judges were replaced only with Catholics and Jews, so today the nine-member court consists of six Catholics and three Jews, without a single Protestant!

I doubt this is an evil conspiracy, but our media never mentions this, and with all the effort at diversity, one might think the Protestant majority should have at least one seat on the Supreme Court, or perhaps a proportional representation of five seats. One might think President Obama is more sensitive to diversity, yet he replaced the last two retiring Protestants with a Catholic and a Jew. One might think that national leaders realized: "Gee, this looks awkward." Apparently, the corporate media agrees, so they ignore the issue. I don't think this is a conspiracy since all were nominated by Protestant Presidents, but it's undemocratic.
_______________

Fast forward to 2016 when much news was made about Obama's Supreme Court nomination that was stalled by Republicans, but no one mentioned it was yet another Jew! I have no problem with Jewish people or Catholics and have many friends, but the lack of diversity on our Supreme Court is stunning, and never mentioned by our corporate media. Yet most Jews are now furious that Trump nominated a Protestant.

It has been written so many time about the “glass ceiling” as far how women not not 50% of CEOs since they are 50% of America. Similar comparison about blacks? But, never one article about 2% of America pulling more than 30% of the Supreme Court; 15 times their statistical share as citizens.

The failure of journalists to write negatively about 2 religious minorities, Judaism and Islam as they are too free to insult the Mormons for example is simply self evidence of selective / biased reporting.

The reality is both Jews and Muslims HATE Christianity, and have been working hard to exterminate it for many centuries. To study the Russian and French revolutions facts is to see how far back such organized campaign has been. To reflect on how Islam spread in mostly Christian countries in the ME is to discover terrorism 1400 years ago. But, no writer wants to get into such easily to document histories, instead, you can find foaming at the mouth articles about how savages were the crusaders or the Spanish Inquisition.

As we can see Trump is attempting to be best friend of Israel, but, the American Jews have bigger fish to fry, and refusing to take such a bait. Their primary goal as it always has been for hundreds of years is the destruction of Christianity. Hence renting Muslims thugs to do their dirty work is a huge priority in advancing such aim. The inconsistency of renting Jew haters, and Israel haters to destroy Christianity in the West can only be explained by both the Jews and Muslims have common goal in HATING Christianity. The annual law suits by Jewish lawyers in America against Christmas celebrations, for example has never been addressed as HATE, as we commonly hear about micro aggression or white privelige, or patriarchy…..

The campaign to ship Muslims to Western countries to create havoc and accelerate dilution of the culture was never openly discussed, but, the absence of reporting about the failure of rich Arab Muslim countries to taking in ALL these refuge is simply an illustration of the destructive agenda of the Western media. It is easy to sea how rich Arab countries supported the War on Assad, yet never took any refugees even so they have the money to do so, as well as the moral obligation since they started that religious war against SECULAR Assad.

FRS can create as much money as they wish. But power can’t be created in such a way.

I don't know Mr. Shamir.. I suspect that being able to create as much money as you can imagine, and spread it all around strategically, can have a significant effect on being able to amass and wield sheer, raw power as well.

Look at just what Soros has wrought, and he's only a dime player compared to Rothschild with his counterfeiting machine, with which he can send trillion$ to hot spots the world over.

one of my strongly felt positions is that we humans should not continue to over-populate and wipe out all the ecology and wildlife on this planet. There are a lot of people that agree. And so a few of them at the Sierra Club realized that most of the numbers of exponentially increasing humans in N. America were coming from S. America as immigrants, and so they considered lobbying to halt this devastating influx of people. And then on cue, a ((man)) with a lot of money sent them a hundred million dollar check on the promise that they never again mention immigration. He liked that America was being transformed, and used his money to effect policy. Money = power, at least in many instances.

I suspect that if we could end the Fed, in a generation or two, we'd get back our Senate and even some media- who knows, perhaps eventually even control of our destiny.

Ending the Feds is a great goal, but, if I was given license by our government to print dollars, and you told me what you want, I would be enraged as my source of power would be taken away, and that power helps me to implement huge secretive agenda. If some little guy insult a mafia boss for example, he never live to see another day. Hence, the subject of the Feds is a taboo subject in America.

Use of multiple, non-Anonymous handles for commenting on this webzine is strongly discouraged, and your secret (real or fictitious) email allows you to authenticate your commenter-identity, preventing others from assuming it, accidentally or otherwise.

Therefore, keeping your Name+Email combination is important, and the 'Remember' feature saves it for you as a cookie on your device/browser.

Also, activating the 'Remember' feature enables the Agree/Disagree/LOL/Troll buttons on all comments.

Email Replies to my Comment

Body of Comment

Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter