Tar & Feather Constitution Patriots

Menu

Category Archives: Our Core Principles

While scrolling through my post-Christmas news this morning I read the story about a Drexel University associate professor’s white genocide comments that sparked the public’s ire, and led to Drexel University officials publicly condemning the tweet.

The associate professor, George Ciccariello-Maher, tweeted “all I want for Christmas is white genocide”. The university issued this statement on Christmas day “Drexel became aware today of Associate Professor George Ciccariello-Maher’s inflammatory tweet, which was posted on his personal Twitter account on Dec. 24, 2016,” reads the statement from Drexel University officials. “While the university recognizes the right of its faculty to freely express their thoughts and opinions in public debate, Professor Ciccariello-Maher’s comments are utterly reprehensible, deeply disturbing, and do not in any way reflect the values of the university. The university is taking this situation very seriously. We contacted Ciccariello-Maher today to arrange a meeting to discuss this matter in detail.” Ciccariello-Maher followed up with the tweet: “To clarify: when the whites were massacre during the Haitian revolution, that was a good thing indeed,”

Ciccariello-Maher is an associate professor specializing in social movements, racism, prisons, law enforcement in the U.S. and particularly in Latin America. According to email correspondence with him from Inside Higher Ed, Ciccariello-Maher claimed the tweets were “satirical”, and commented that he received hundreds of death threats.

He went on to claim it as an imagery concept about white supremacists, and that we need to do our research. He added in further statements that the statement by Drexel University was “chilling” and “While upholding my right to free expression, the statement refers to my (satirical) tweets as ‘utterly reprehensible,” he said.” On the university level, moreover, this statement — despite a tepid defense of free speech — sends a chilling message and sets a frightening precedent. It exposes untenured and temporary faculty not only to internal disciplinary scrutiny, but equally importantly, it encourages harassment as an effective means to impact university policies.”

The associate professors twitter account has been set to private and his poison can no longer be viewed. I have done my research Ciccariello-Maher, and you are a liar in the first degree! Ciccariello-Maher, you are the racist, you are the instigator to public turmoil in our U.S. society. If you don’t like white people (and it’s wholly obvious you don’t) then stop making your living teaching them your racism! Go to your beloved Latin American failed countries and promote your hate there. You’re unbridled “gas-bag” rhetoric is what is wrong with our higher education system! You condemn white people for speaking their opinion, but you think you should be able to call for, and wish for white genocide and expect your hatred and caustic speech to be protected! You are nothing more than an educated associate professor promoting racism, bigotry, racial genocide, killing, and hatred. Research genocide gas-bag, it means killing, and that’s what you promoted by that tweet. If any white people are murdered because of the statements you made you can be prosecuted and imprisoned! Research that! You cannot instigate murder (genocide) without repercussions.

You say you have received hundreds of death threats? I don’t believe you! Because you are one of the progressive-liberal minded educators, you have adopted the tactic of deception, and deceit to promote your hate. Your claims of death threats are likely “fake news”, and you know it. The real tax paying, family-minded, conservative white people do not believe the lies anymore! We became aware of these liberal and progressive tactics 3 years ago. In your twisted mind you think that only white people can be racists. This is because racists have educated and brainwashed you. You twist your historical facts based on opinions you have learned through your teacher’s racist lies. You closed your mind to the warmth of love and racial equality early in your childhood, supplanting it with the poisonous seeds of your racist teachers, and forming your own racism. You are like Barack Obama in that way,… a trained and learned racist.

After tweeting your caustic words you actually think that Drexel University should not have the power to discipline you! More of that liberal progressive thinking! You work for them at their pleasure fool! I hope they terminate your position with them. I hope your students turn their back to you in class. Here is Drexel Universities Social Media Policy (I did the research, maybe you should have). I hate the fact that a tenured professor can spew anything he wants with no fallout. Tenures should be done away with as well. You are the worst kind of racist because you actually believe the racism that you promote against whites is justifiable!

I hope that any offended parties sue you and bankrupt you into obscurity! George Ciccariello-Maher, you are a racist, a hater, and you suck! You should just crawl into your hole with the other hater liberal-progressives!

NEW INFORMATION: 12/27/2016 — Now Ciccariello-Maher has given his rebuttal to the criticism by the public of his racist statements,… and what do you think it is? He says the white critics are racists! Exactly like I said he would! I knew he would blame his critics for his statement as if we were flapping his racist jaws for him! George Ciccariello-Maher you are not an academic in any viable discipline,… no, you are merely a cowering little professor of racism in that you profess your own racism. Then you twist criticism against you as racist. Your like a little baby shaking a ring of plastic keys, throwing them on the floor expecting mommy to pick them up and give them back to you. Your not a baby, and you don’t get your keys back, racist!

Was it not the democrats, the liberals, and the socialists that said that ALL U.S. Citizens must have the right to assemble, and to demonstrate, and to exercise free speech? Then why do they CONSISTENTLY oppose the rights of ALL others outside their ideology the very same rights. Why do they CONSISTENTLY embrace violence as a method to impose their ideologies upon those that do not want their form of thinking? Why do they CONSISTENTLY impose their will upon ALL peoples of our country? Is it because their pedophile, lying, cheating, murdering, traitorous nominee did not get elected? Is it because they are paid activists? Is it because they are brainwashed in the stupidity that is the liberal, democratic agenda?

Yes to all of these and more! These violent protestors, and thugs should have the same violence applied to them that they apply to the rest of us! They are the enemy of the state. They are the cancer in our country. They are what is killing our nation. They are the Anti-United States of America. They must be stopped. Find them in their homes. Find them in their apartments. Find them in their pubs and bars. Find them especially where they congregate. Go to them in crowds and get in their face like they do to us! Assemble and protest everything they do! Exercise your second amendment rights if you need to protect yourselves from being accosted by them. Put them in their Anti-U.S. place. The Democratic Party represents tyranny! The Democratic Party’s time is over!

Join together against the democratic liberal socialists and fight! Show them who we are! Amass all we can to step on them! Crush their spirit! TAKE THE FIGHT TO THEM!!!They have George Soros (a foreigner) to bankroll them, so we must assemble against all of them and use our representative republic, our conservatism, and our constitutional mandate to ensure our place in our society! DO NOT LET THEIR METHODS WIN OUT! Prosecute them and take away their money! We can use their 180 degree methods against them (when they say yes they are really saying no, etc.). We are on the precipice of change! Let us turn back the irrationality of liberal, socialist thinking. The Supreme Power has blessed our endeavors, but we must do the footwork. Let us join hands and change our nation back to our Constitutional way of governance. The way it was before the democrats and liberal thinkers hijacked it. A Representative Republic By the People, and for the People,… ALL People!WATCH THIS VIDEO!

This week is a week of mourning. Don Pace, the founder of this website and author of many articles here has passed on to God’s hands. We also want to send our prayers out to Jay’, his widow, and her family. Don was a hero to many people he helped in the darkness of addiction and alcoholism. I am one of those he helped. Through his patience, kindness, and understanding he listened to my darkness of soul and showed me that all things will pass,… even the immeasurable suffering of the soul. I unloaded my deepest, darkest secrets upon him and he laughed at me saying that I wasn’t good at being bad. Then he shared part of his own past darkness with me to show me the light of God is within the reach of all that want it. My recovery began in earnest because of God’s love through Don. I can never repay my debt to him. He simply told me to help others,… to give away all that was given to me because it is the paradox of giving that we receive. Thank you Don!

Don Pace, or “Spankin’ Don” as Jamie Allman (FM 97.1 Talk Radio Show Host) liked to call him, was also a decorated Vietnam veteran. He was in the US Navy Construction Battalions. Of his numerous medals he was awarded the Silver Star Medal for gallantry in action against an enemy of the United States. Don was a constitutional conservative who believed in the rights of all people to be happy, joyous, and free. He believed we should all be able to excel in our work without discrimination. He believed we should all be able to vote however we saw fit without the biases we obviously can see everywhere. He believed political correctness was a dysfunction, and a polite way to cover ones ass. He was a straight shooter and would tell you the truth if you had the balls to hear it. Don Pace was my friend, and I’ll never forget him.

I don’t know what will happen to this website now but until directed otherwise I will continue to carry the torch of conservative action through articles and outcries about our completely dysfunctional legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government as well as our wholly biased bureaus of law enforcement. It’s the way Don would have wanted it. He projected his outrage at our government’s complete lack of common sense by starting this website. I will speak to Jay’, and maybe she will take it over and write for it. It would be a welcome addition if she would like to,… we’ll see.

Until next week, God bless you all and let’s move on with the mission, that’s what Don would wanted!

Boats

NEWS: I HAVE TALKED TO JANE (DON’S WIDOW) AND SHE DOES NOT WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH POLITICS, OR THIS WEBSITE. SHE HAS EXPRESSED TO ME THAT SHE DOES NOT CARE WHAT HAPPENS TO IT. SHE DOES NOT LIKE IT. SHE SAID TO “GIVE IT AWAY, OR GET RID OF IT HOW EVER YOU WANT TO.” I REPLIED THAT I WOULD TALK TO HER ABOUT IT AGAIN IN A MONTH TO SEE IF SHE HAS CHANGED HER MIND.

Since I don’t get a lot of replies, comments, or desires to post anything from our audience I will likely dismantle this site in a month and keep the articles, images, and commentaries for an archive. I went to Don’s viewing at the funeral home and he looked better than ever! Really! On a sad note all of his military decorations were upside down, and the obituary was shallower than any I have ever read. Many of the people he helped were there, but some were not. Bottom line: I was disappointed in the way he was disrespected by his family and several friends, including his widow and her family, and I stand by my assessment. People have become so damn apathetic about life in general and it is shameful. Don was a good man with stellar character. A true straight shooter, and he would want me to be the same about him. That’s why I’m telling it like it is.

North Carolina has decided to allow Christian businesses, and organizations to decide for their selves whether to deny or allow LGBT communities to utilize their services. Of course the LGBT community is whining that the Christian businesses, and communities are so intolerant of them, etc. wahhh, wahhh, wahhh. Now for the LGBT burn.

The entertainment community, LGBT communities, and others are not tolerant of the religious organizations right to freedom of religion (a centuries old constitutional right). Its ok for them to boycott and cancel events based on their beliefs, but Christian businesses and organizations can’t because of theirs? I think their fans that bought tickets to their cancelled events should sue them for millions of dollars so they can feel the insanity of this line of thinking first hand.

The LGBT community is not happy dragging themselves to hell (in my Christian opinion). No, they want everyone having faith in God to join them there. I don’t see them pulling this crap with Muslim organizations, because they would be killed for it, and our idiot government would find a way to make the killing somehow justifiable!

It’s time to say it out loud! Christians are being oppressed by our government, Muslims, and a multitude of others. Because Christians are non-violent for the most part, these oppressors know they can get away with the indignant treatment of us. Satan’s got a serious grip on these people. It is written in the Bible that Christians worldwide would be oppressed and killed for believing in our Savior Jesus during the “end times”. I don’t know whether to take up the gun, or take up the cross to defend my beliefs. I’ll defend my family and loved ones with whatever means I have (as it’s written in the Bible). As far as my personal self-defense, I’ll take up the cross because I’m a Christian. I pity foolish people who don’t know the salvation that is in Christ Jesus. North Carolina is only doing what the people of that state want to do. If others don’t like it don’t go there.

In the City of St. Louis, MO I have started noticing people stopping and observing the police when a “law enforcement event” is taking place in public such as police questioning an individual or group of individuals, or even giving a traffic citation. This is happening because the police are not trust-worthy anymore. They have too many incidents of brutality and harassment that are on camera against them. They can’t seem to shake this animosity towards them. Making the situation still worse is the fact that the police now monitor, at will, the general population using various public, private and government security video cameras in St. Louis. The police know where all the cameras are because they are the monitoring authority. They are careful not to get out of line when on camera, but who knows what they do when not on camera? Even if they are not doing anything wrong, the impression they leave is that they are.

According to the Police Officer’s Union the police seem to think that their personal privacy is being cast into jeopardy if they are required to wear “body cameras” while on the job. It’s alright for them to monitor our public life and license plates at will, but when we, the public, want the same courtesy they cry foul!

I think that, as trusted public servants and law enforcement officers, they should be required to wear body cameras at all times where close public interaction is possible. This Police Officer’s Union excuse of “personal privacy” is BS and they know it. They just want to be able to play their same old tricks and games and get away with it. A leopard can’t change its spots. A few corrupt and intimidating police officers have caused this schism between the public and the police to open up. Their union covers for them and causes the schism to get wider.

It’s time for complete transparency by our law enforcement authorities. If transparency does not happen then the flame of anti-police violence will be stoked until it’s an inferno requiring extraordinary methods to put it out.

These are the principles of liberty that our forefathers ascribed to. They were used in the creation of the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and other established instruments of our Republic and U.S. freedom and liberty. The idea that a free people could start a republic from scratch and be able to endeavor to achieve the full potential that freedom and liberty could provide for those people was a novel idea in that time. Today it would be like an oppressed population yoked by the government, building a city under the deep sea, and establishing a republic from that melting pot of people using a controversial set of principles. Few would think to do it. Few would think it could be done. Free thinkers could do it. Here are the principles of liberty.

Individual Liberty: The principle that individuals have an inalienable right to act in their own interest with complete control over themselves and their property, and are the sole arbiters of what is best for themselves so long as their actions do not infringe upon the liberty or property rights of others.

Personal Responsibility: The principle that individuals who are free to determine their own course of action have the responsibility for the consequences that ensue from that action. Actions have consequences. Personal Responsibility means owning the results of those actions, good or bad.

Property Rights: The principle that the right to determine one’s own actions (liberty) extends to one’s production. Production comes from an individual’s mind and efforts and is as unique to that person as any other aspect of that person. As such, production (and, subsequently, property acquired through voluntary transaction between parties) is the sole dominion of its creator.

Free Markets: Free markets spring from property rights and liberty. Property rights dictate a free market economy in which one may exercise the liberty to use and dispose of property in the manner that the owner determines is in his best interest. It is not the role of government to create barriers to entry, disturb free market mechanisms such as price signaling, compete with private enterprise or distort the markets through regulation or other intrusions to advance a social, political or any other end.

Limited Government: To quote Jefferson, “The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.” The premise of this statement is that for liberty to be preserved, government must be held in check.

State vs. Federal Balance of Power: The principle that the powers of the federal government are few and enumerated, while the powers left to the states or the people are broad and undefined. The nation’s founders made their case based largely upon the premise that state governments would always hold the limited powers of the federal government in check.

Fiscal Responsibility: Government cannot “provide” anything that it has not first taken from the people. This means that we must always evaluate the opportunity cost of the government’s takings from the people. The private markets are subject to competitive pressures on price, services, products, quality and profitability; the government is not. Government has a moral and a fiduciary duty to be responsible and accountable to the people for that which it has coercively taken from the people.

Equal Protection / Rule of Law: This is the principle that all citizens receive equal protection under both federal and state law, and that no groups of people receive either favorable or unfavorable treatment from government. It is not the role of government to create a special group or class of citizens for protection or punishment, special treatment or penalties. The force of government is only legitimate if it is limited and applied equally for the protection of the rights of all.

Uphold The Constitution of The United States: This principle is based upon the concept that the constitution is the essential basis of a social contract between the people and their government, guiding the voluntary delegation of power from the people to the government for specific purposes. If the constitution is found to be lacking or needing change, there is a specific process to effect that change, but until such change might be made, the constitution is to be upheld.