Nazi diehards, Trump diehards, pretty much the same

In
his 1947 book, Nuremberg Diary, the psychiatrist G.M. Gilbert reports on the
psychological development of the 21 top Nazi defendants over an eight-month
period, as they were tried for war crimes and other atrocities in 1945-1946.
Gilbert was in an ideal position to do so: he was Chief Prison Psychologist at
the Nuremberg Trial, and had unlimited access to the prisoners, who tended to
trust him more than they trusted even their own lawyers.

One
source of interest in the book (which makes fascinating reading) is to see how
the defendants evolved from their initial psychological state of denial (“I did
nothing wrong,” “I was only obeying orders,” “Hitler meant well but was misled
by Himmler,” “There really was a ‘Jewish Problem’ that had to be solved,” etc.)
to later states of remorse and contrition, as they realized the enormity of
what Hitler had done. Not all did so; about three months into the trial,
Gilbert characterized the 21 defendants according to their degree of
repentance. Some—Hans Frank, Albert Speer, Hjalmar Schacht, Hans Fritzsche—were
increasingly willing to denounce Hitler and accept their own responsibility for
what had happened. Others—Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Julius
Streicher, and, in particular, Hermann Goering—were far more recalcitrant. All
four in fact went to their deaths (by suicide or hanging) stubbornly resolved
to protect the Nazi myth. For Gilbert, they presented the most compelling cases
of pathological denialism. After the massive evidence presented at the
trial—films, photographs, eyewitness accounts, diaries, official records,
confessions—how could anyone rationally deny that the Nazi regime had committed
the worst crimes in human history?

Still,
many of the defendants, looking back at their careers, came to understand that
they had been hoodwinked by Hitler’s mesmerizing personality. Hitler’s chief
architect and, in the war’s final stages, armaments minister, Albert Speer, is
a good example. “I must admit that

[admiring Hitler]

was weakness on my part,” he told Gilbert. “I should have and actually did realize

[sic]

it sooner, but kept playing at this hypocritical game until it was too
late—well, because it was easier.” About half the defendants expressed a
similar rationale. “I should have…but I didn’t.”
And, of course, by the time they realized the jig was up, they were already on
trial for their lives in the old Nuremberg Prison.

The
analogy between the hardcore Nazis and Trump supporters is natural and apt. Most
of us know that Trump is a criminal and a disaster for America (just as Hitler
proved to be a disaster for Germany, which largely lay in ruins at the
conclusion of World War II). And yet, there’s that 90% of Republicans that
stands by his side, unable to see through his lies, stubbornly refusing to take
any responsibility for what has happened and what is likely to happen that will
be far worse, as Trump hunkers down for the coming fight he started.

Goering
is the prima facie example of the
psychology of hardcore Trump supporters. Throughout the Diary, Gilbert—who
spent a lot of one-on-one time with him in his cell—portrays Goering as
self-righteous, stubborn, immune to facts, glaringly defiant, and determined to
continue the fight. Goering lashed out at his co-defendants who dared criticize
Hitler. “It makes me sick to see Germans
selling their souls to the enemy!” At another point, he screams to Gilbert,
“I just wish we all had the courage to
combine our defense to three simple words: Lick my arse!” Then Goering tries
to justify his crimes. “They ask me why I
didn’t turn against him [Hitler]…the German people would never forgive me for
that…If I’ve got to die, I’d rather die as a martyr than a traitor.” It was
pride that prevented Goering from acknowledging his role in the deaths of a
hundred million people and the devastation of large tracts of Europe.

It
is pride, too, that prevents Trump supporters from seeing and acknowledging
their complicity in his crimes. The pride of stubbornness, of being unable to
change course even when they know the present path leads to disaster. It is
also, possibly, the hope that, someday, future generations will bless their
names (Goering predicted that “in 50
years” Germany would erect “marble monuments”
to him and the other leading Nazis). But future generations will not bless
Trump supporters, any more than Germans came to celebrate the Nazi ringleaders.

There
is one exception to this: the neo-nazi white nationalists active in Germany,
who continue to try and resurrect a Nazi regime. Inspired by Trump, they’re
infecting America, too, and other Western countries; New Zealand just gave
proof of that. What we can do, what we must do for our future, is convince
swing Republicans to take the Speer route, confess their errors, and reform, rather
than the Goering route of denying responsibility to the end. (Goering, by the
way, cheated the hangman: he committed suicide by swallowing a cyanide capsule
just hours before he was to be hung. Sic
temp tyrannis!)