> My feeling today is that SVGP
> should be as close to "Static SVG Basic" as possible.
Yes! I want this badly. One of the common uses I have in my day-time job is
to produce static images (.gif, .png) automatically. Formally you would use
something like ASPImage or Java2D, but nowadays rasterizing SVG is a much
more attractive way of doing this. And here have dynamic and animated SVG
images just makes things much more complex. A static profile would be much
needed.
I think SVG Static might be a better name then SVG Printing since the
profile sure will be used for much more then printing.
/niklas
www.protocol7.com