The person writing this article clearly has an issue transferring thought to paper (or PC in this case). The sentence structures are horrible, it's extremely verbose and the syntax adds nothing to the article. It appears as if someone is trying to communicate what could be a very easy point but has gone completely overboard by trying to sound intelligent and failing by a milestone.

Writing doesn't have to be difficult:

Introduction and Thesis
Transition
Body (points that need to be made)
Transition
Conclusion

It's as simple as that. Hell, that's writing One-zero-One that most people should already be aware of.

As far as the content, identifying logical fallacies in arguments by anecdotal evidence is fine but it feels like the writer completely loses the point within a swirling whirlpool of semantics.