Rockland County, NY - Development Responds To Order To Shut Down Mikvah And Synagogue With Threat Of Religious Rights Lawsuit

Rockland County, NY - A Spring Valley condominium complex at the center of an NAACP complaint charging that the development was marketed exclusively to the Orthodox Jewish community may soon become the subject of a federal civil rights lawsuit after being ordered by the village to remove both its mikvahs and an on-premises synagogue.

Overlooking Spring Valley’s Memorial Park, the Park View condominiums were part of an urban renewal project in the downtown area and were partially built using federal funding, as previously reported on VIN News (http://bit.ly/2ew3y8J).

The NAACP filed suit against the Village of Spring Valley and developers of the project in 2013, saying that the four bedroom units with two kitchens and succah porches were being marketed directly to the Chasidic community. The original “For Sale” sign at the site included no phone number, reported The Journal News, and NAACP members who posed as prospective buyers said that they were not given the opportunity to tour the apartments, while calls for information were not returned.

Spring Valley building inspector Walter Booker discovered a school, a synagogue and two mikvahs during a June visit to the property.

Booker had rejected early plans for the onsite mikvahs at the development, saying that they violated guidelines for federally funded projects. When Booker discovered that ritual baths were under construction in violation of the site plan, he ordered the developer to remove them several years ago.

Advertisement:

Assistant building inspector Manny Carmona later approved plans for “endless pools” in 2015 while Booker was under suspension, but that year-long permit expired this past May. Booker, who was subsequently reinstated as building inspector, refuse to renew the permit, ordering the mikvahs to be removed from the premises in late June.

An on-site synagogue and school were also found to be in violation of the site plan, which specified that the development’s community room could only be used for religious purposes if members of all religions had equal use of the space.

While Booker’s orders to shutter both the synagogue and the mikvahs are currently pending in local courts, lawyers for Park View have responded with the threat of legal action charging the village and Booker with violating the owners’ First Amendment rights and RLUIPA, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.

Religious freedom outweighs land use regulations, argued attorney John Stepanovich, who successfully litigated two similar cases in nearby Airmont.

“There is no legitimate government interest, let alone a compelling one, in imposing special burdens and restrictions on the use of property for religious purposes,” said Stepanovich.

Booker’s lawyer, William Gerard, said that because the religious restrictions at the development were part of the site plan, his client’s actions do not violate the constitutionally guaranteed right to the free practice of religion.

“He’s not budging,” said Gerard. “He’s got to enforce the zoning code and that’s what he’s doing. This isn’t a question of imposing restrictions on religion.”

According to Gerard, Spring Valley mayor Demezza Delhomme has said that Booker should remove the violations. Delhomme, who has long had a contentious relationship with Booker, denied having spoken with the building inspector and declined to comment on the matter.

Stepanovich said that his clients would be seeking financial damages from both Booker and the Village of Spring Valley.

3

Oct 20, 2016 at 01:59 PMAnonymous Says:

I hope the feds win. The tax money given by the government should be used for ALL people, not just Frum. If there is an illegal school here, does it have fire extinguishers and alarms as the law dictates?

4

Oct 20, 2016 at 02:27 PMyonasonw Says:

"...The original “For Sale” sign at the site included no phone number, reported The Journal News, and NAACP members who posed as prospective buyers said that they were not given the opportunity to tour the apartments, while calls for information were not returned..."

If that turns out to be true...it's little different from the Trump case in the 70s, and the developer is toast.

5

Oct 20, 2016 at 06:34 PMAnonymous Says:

Any time someone accepts state or federal funding, they run the risk of problems, vis-a-vis alleged discrimination. I remember that back in 1977, I was working at a JCC in a midwestern city. An arrogant member of a minority group came into our facility, stating that he was from a state of Ohio agency, which contributed supplies to the summer day camp. Then, he had the chutzpah to want to know how many of the campers were Black? He may have also quesitoned what what the racial makeup of the camp staff was? However, I told him that we didn't keep statistics based on race. I told him that we would get back to him. However, I never did. I think that he came back at least one other time. What chutzpah!!

6

Oct 20, 2016 at 07:51 PMfavish Says:

“
Amazing that in this day and age people think they can still get away with this blatant discrimination and mixing of religion with government funds. ”

so i'm not allowed sinks for meat and dairy,' netilas youdoim' sinks., removable roofs for sukksh, huh? where does this religion thing start and end.. how about not allowing more than 2 bedrooms because those who need more is because they practice religion of be fruitful and multiply?

7

Oct 20, 2016 at 07:51 PMAnonymous Says:

“
Any time someone accepts state or federal funding, they run the risk of problems, vis-a-vis alleged discrimination. I remember that back in 1977, I was working at a JCC in a midwestern city. An arrogant member of a minority group came into our facility, stating that he was from a state of Ohio agency, which contributed supplies to the summer day camp. Then, he had the chutzpah to want to know how many of the campers were Black? He may have also quesitoned what what the racial makeup of the camp staff was? However, I told him that we didn't keep statistics based on race. I told him that we would get back to him. However, I never did. I think that he came back at least one other time. What chutzpah!! ”

You make zero sense. The developer violated federal laws and you compare this to a JCC camp??

8

Oct 20, 2016 at 08:35 PMjudith Says:

“
Any time someone accepts state or federal funding, they run the risk of problems, vis-a-vis alleged discrimination. I remember that back in 1977, I was working at a JCC in a midwestern city. An arrogant member of a minority group came into our facility, stating that he was from a state of Ohio agency, which contributed supplies to the summer day camp. Then, he had the chutzpah to want to know how many of the campers were Black? He may have also quesitoned what what the racial makeup of the camp staff was? However, I told him that we didn't keep statistics based on race. I told him that we would get back to him. However, I never did. I think that he came back at least one other time. What chutzpah!! ”

This housing case isn't a case of chutzpah on the part of the NAACP, but on the part of the Yiden. Housing must be open to all, based on our Constitution and laws. Jews benefit from those laws as well.