Black panthers intimidating voters in pa and oh

As each state reported their final election details, the evidence of voter fraud is astounding.Massive voter fraud has been reported in areas of OH and FL, with PA, WI and VA, all are deploying personnel to investigate election results.With 300 New Black Panther Party members at polling places, though, the one where Jackson and King Samir Shabazz were stationed was the only one where an incident occurred.Therefore, the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, which deals with all racially motivated voter intimidation cases, determined that “the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation,” according to testimony on May 14, 2010, from Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez further noted that the New Black Panther Party posted a message on its website — before the civil action was filed — that stated, “Specifically, in the case of Philadelphia, the New Black Panther Party wishes to express that the actions of people purported to be members do not represent the official views of the New Black Panther Party and are not connected nor in keeping with our official position as a party.”Perez also testified, “In July 2009, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania declined prosecution in the matter.When the cameraman asks who the two men are, one answers, “Security.”The New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense, in operation since 1989, is not affiliated with the Black Panther Party founded by Bobby Seale in the 1960s, the Department of Justice notes.Politi looked at the timeline of the incident and its fallout: The story was reported immediately in the media. 7, 2009, two weeks before Barack Obama took over the presidency, the Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit in U. District Court under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, accusing the two men, as well as the New Black Panther Party and its leader, Malik Zulu Shabazz, of voter intimidation.

This is voter intimidation arranged for by the Obama Administration with hardly enough plausible deniability to wrap a microdot in.But because Attorney General Eric Holder is involved in the dismissal of the criminal charges, the situation takes on some importance.”There are still many who agree that the government was too lenient in dropping the case against all but one defendant, and that the injunction should have been extended nationwide for all New Black Panther Party members and for a longer time than 2012. But O’Reilly and other Fox pundits did mislead by confusing the distinction between criminal and civil charges, Politi determined.According to the timeline and testimony before the U. Commission on Civil Rights, the decision not to criminally charge the New Black Panthers was made during the Bush administration.None of the defendants responded to the complaint, so it is correct, as the e-mail states, that this should have been a slam-dunk case for the prosecution, Politi reports.But according to the Voting Rights Act’s statute under which the suit was filed, the Justice Department would have to meet the requirement that a “campaign of intimidation” was directed.Our understanding is that local law enforcement officials also declined to pursue state criminal charges.”The Justice Department dropped the case against all but King Samir Shabazz, saying that his display of a nightstick “supported the allegation of voter intimidation.” Justice did obtain an injunction, good until 2012, prohibiting him from displaying a weapon within 100 feet of a polling place.