The Transition From Newtonian Mechanics to Galilean
Transformation Via Calculus of Variation
Dr.Sami. H.Altoum
(Ph.D Mathematics)
Umm Al-qura University –KSA-University College of Al- Qunfudah
Abstract: The aim of this research to show some standard of fact of special relativity theory can be

derived
from the calculus of variations. To give the essential of the method ,it suffices to suppose that M is one –
dimensional ,so that the Newtonian picture is of a particle of mass m moving on a line with coordinate x and
potential energy V  x  .We deduced Galilean transformation via calculus of variations

The Galilean transformation is used to transform between the coordinates of two reference
frames which differ only by constant relative motion within the constructs of Newtonian physics. This is
the passive transformation point of view. The equations below, although apparently obvious, break down at
speeds that approach the speed of light owing to physics described by relativity theory.Galileo formulated these
concepts in his description of uniform motion. The topic was motivated by Galileo's description of the motion of
a ball rolling down a ramp, by which he measured the numerical value for the acceleration of gravity near the
surface of the Earth. The Galilean symmetries can be uniquely written as the composition of a rotation,
a translation and a uniform motion of space-time. Let x represent a point in three-dimensional space, and ta
point in one-dimensional time. A general point in space-time is given by an ordered pair  x, t  . In this research
we deduced galilean transformation via so we define a variational principle is a scientific principle used within
the calculus of variation, which develops general methods for finding functions which minimize or maximize
the value of quantities that depends upon those functions. For example, to answer this question: "What is the
shape of a chain suspended at both ends?" we can use the variational principle that the shape must minimize the
gravitational potential energy.

II.

Variational Principle

In classical mechanics the motion of a system with n degree of freedom

Given Euler equations for the extremals in coordinates free from introducing the Cartan 1-form L ,a 1differential forms on T M    . This can be defined by using a coordinate system. We find it is useful to see

Well, this innocuous looking claim has some very perplexing logical consequences with regard
to relative velocities, where we have expectations that follow, seemingly, from self-evident common sense. For
instance, suppose the propagation velocity of ripples (water waves) in a calm lake is 0.5 m/s. If I am walking
along a dock at 1 m/s and I toss a pebble in the lake, the guy sitting at anchor in a boat will see the ripples move
by at 0.5 m/s but I will see them dropping back relative to me! That is, I can "outrun" the waves. In
mathematical terms, if all the velocities are in the same direction (say, along x), we just add relative velocities:
if vies the velocity of the wave relative to the water and u is my velocity relative to the water, then v', the
velocity of the wave relative to me, is given by v' = v - u. This common sense equation is known as the Galilean
velocity transformation- a big name for a little idea, it would seem. With a simple diagram, we can summarize
the common-sense Galilean transformations.

www.irjes.com

28 | Page

The Transition From Newtonian Mechanics to Galilean Transformation Via Calculus of Variation

First of all, it is self-evident that t'=t, otherwise nothing would make any sense at all. Nevertheless, we
include this explicitly. Similarly, if the relative motion of O' with respect to O is only in the x direction,
then y'=y and z'=z, which were true at t=t'=0, must remain true at all later times. In fact, the only coordinates
that differ between the two observers are x and x'. After a time t, the distance (x') from O' to some
obect A is less than the distance (x) from O to A by an amount ut, because that is how much closer O'
has moved to A in the interim. Mathematically, x' = x - ut.

The velocity v A of A in the reference frame of O also looks different when viewed from O' - namely, we have
to subtract the relative velocity of O' with respect toO, which we have labeled

v Az  v Az
This is all so simple and obvious that it is hard to focus one's attention on it. We take all these properties for
granted - and therein lies the danger.A uniform motion, with velocity v, is given
by

Hence the symmetry group is the group of rigid motions of the real line. We also see that the symmetry group
permuting this class of Lagrangians is the symmetry group of the Lagrangian for the extremals of the
free Lagrangian.
Now let us are looking for maps  of x, t   space into itself which permute the extremals of

Equation (22) is a Galilean transformation and equivalence equation (7).

Conclusion:
In this research we deduced Galilean transformation via calculus of variations, also
Its defining property can be but more physically in the following way:
If

 dx dt 
s  xs , t s  is a curve in space-time, let  /  be the velocity of the curve. The Galilean
 ds ds 
transformations permute the curves of constant velocity. The coefficient  is the increment given to
the velocity. The new coordinates for space-time introduced by a Galilean transformation then
represent physically a coordinate system moving at constant velocity with respect to the old.

Dr. Sami Hajazi Mustafa
received his PhD degree in Differential Geometry from Alneelain University, Sudan in 2007.
He was a head of Department of Mathematics in Academy of Engineering Sciences in Sudan.
Now he is Assistant Professor of Mathematics, University college of Alqunfudha, Umm Al
Qura University , Saudi Arabia.