Telstra, Terria jostle for position

Terria and Telstra today welcomed Communications Minister Stephen Conroy's move to name 26 November as the final deadline for bids to build and operate the planned national broadband network, but did not change their positions on how the initiative should go forward.

Terria and Telstra today welcomed Communications Minister Stephen Conroy's move to name 26 November as the final deadline for bids to build and operate the planned national broadband network, but did not change their positions on how the initiative should go forward.

Conroy this morning announced that the government had received the
necessary network information from all the carriers and had judged it compliant.
Proponents now have access to the information and have 12 weeks to lodge their
proposals.

David Quilty(Credit: Telstra)

Although both Telstra and Terria, a conglomerate of rival firms,
welcomed the start of the race, Telstra maintained it was
only prepared to build the network "as long as it is in [its]
shareholders' interest to do so". The telco has previously
threatened not to build the network if structural separation was a
condition of building the network.

Terria felt the need to insist that its bid would be
"technologically first-rate", while Telstra took the chance to
talk up its experience.

"For over 100 years, Telstra has been
connecting Australians, going to places where no other company is
willing to go," Telstra's group managing director, public policy and communications
David Quilty said in a statement.

Quilty called the network an "upgrade to Telstra's existing
network", insinuating that since Telstra knew Telstra best, it
would be the logical choice.

Terria played to the broadband lower-class, reiterating that it
would take care of them first.

"The national broadband network is a great opportunity for
country and regional areas, and a number of metropolitan 'black
spots', to finally get a fair-go," Terria chairman Michael Egan
said in a statement.

Meanwhile, it also pulled out its tried and trained battle horse
— structural separation — saying it was imperative the
network must be separated from access seekers.

Quilty denigrated separation as strongly as Egan
had praised it, saying that Telstra would provide open access to
the network without it.

"Open access means that Telstra's competitors will be able to
access the NBN on an equivalent basis as Telstra's own business
units," Quilty said, adding that he expected the promise to be
watched over by the regulator.

Terria chairman Michael Egan(Credit: Terria)

"Telstra's guarantee of open access renders obsolete the
'fool's gold' debate around separation. Separation increases
costs and kills off investment and it has not worked anywhere in
the world," he concluded.

Telstra was quiet on the delays to the deadline, despite its
former public policy and communications Phil Burgess previously
accusing the government of "dithering".

Egan excused the fact that the deadline for proposals had been
pushed back almost half a year — the date in the
original request for proposals stood at 25 July.

"Without that information it would have been impossible for
competitive bids to be developed and lodged," he said. "The
government promised a competitive process and is living up to that
promise."

Other bodies which have put in a bond but have kept a lower
profile include TransACT, Acacia and the Tasmanian government.