Chelsea wanstrath dating jeremy

To do otherwise would be prohibited by (in the EU), Article 13 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights and (in the US) by the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Protection from discrimination includes protection from a ‘hostile working environment’, which again applies in the UK and US.

Furthermore, not only employees but customers (including online customers and convention attendees) would be entitled to sue (see, for example, s29 Equality Act 2010).

Furthermore their customers could be sued if they required any employee to work on the openly racist project.

They also objected to my use of the original photos intended for this article, forcing me to harvest photos from Flickr that had been released under Creative Commons licenses. UK law requires libel claimants to mitigate their losses (Mawdsley v Guardian Newspapers [2002] EWHC 1780 (QB)).

By failing to take the opportunity to correct pre-publication they have failed to mitigate 100% of their losses.

Git Hub tried to stop her image appearing in this article.

Why would she want her picture not to appear by her words? He has changed the licensing since then but the grant of the CC-BY 2.0 is irrevocable.

Any company which says it is ok to harass some people can potentially be sued by all of those people regardless of whether they have actually been affected by the policy.

In the UK, s26 of the Equality Act 2010 would apply.

UK law requires libel claimants to comply with pre-action rules (like saying which facts you dispute).