So now you are justifying it because it was a small percentage, although illegal?

The FBI determined that the illegality(if any) wasn't worth pursuing charges. The 2000 re-classified after the fact far outnumbered the small amount of emails sent previously. Virtually none out of 30000 emails put the country at risk or were intentionally mishandled - thus the main point.

The re-classifed emails totaled 2000. You were speaking on less than a 100. Even with the 2000 re-classified later, the FBI had a flimsy case of both obstruction of justice and intentionally mishandling classified information.

Only it's not the FBI's job to determine whether to pursue charges, that's the responsibility of the DOJ. It's up to the FBI to determine whether there is evidence of crimes committed, and they testified that several were.

The re-classifed emails totaled 2000. You were speaking on less than a 100. Even with the 2000 re-classified later, the FBI had a flimsy case of both obstruction of justice and intentionally mishandling classified information.

Only it's not the FBI's job to determine whether to pursue charges, that's the responsibility of the DOJ. It's up to the FBI to determine whether there is evidence of crimes committed, and they testified that several were.

Semantics. Comey recommended to the DoJ that it's not worth pursuing charges.

Semantics. Comey recommended to the DoJ that it's not worth pursuing charges.

Comey also stated that crimes were committed. The part that you ignore and lie about blatantly. The DOJ was never going to pursue Hillary, and frankly it's easy to understand why. Indicting your own Presidential candidate weeks before a "97% victory!"? No chance in hell. She could've been on video deleting subpoenaed emails herself and cackling and they would not have pursued it. As to why Trump isn't? Optics. It doesn't do him any good to pursue a now politically irrelevant never-was and risk the poor optics of even potentially locking up a political opponent.

Regardless of all of that, it doesn't excuse your retarded behavior. Just admit you were wrong and shut the **** up. You can come back in a few days and say something stupid again.

Moving the goal posts means I've changed my goals since this discussion started which isn't the case. The point still remains - there is barely anything at all to locking Hillary up for intentionally mishandling classified information and even for obstruction of justice.

Comey also stated that crimes were committed. The part that you ignore and lie about blatantly. The DOJ was never going to pursue Hillary, and frankly it's easy to understand why. Indicting your own Presidential candidate weeks before a "97% victory!"? No chance in hell. She could've been on video deleting subpoenaed emails herself and cackling and they would not have pursued it. As to why Trump isn't? Optics. It doesn't do him any good to pursue a now politically irrelevant never-was and risk the poor optics of even potentially locking up a political opponent.

Regardless of all of that, it doesn't excuse your retarded behavior. Just admit you were wrong and shut the **** up. You can come back in a few days and say something stupid again.

Comey also stated that crimes were committed. The part that you ignore and lie about blatantly.

Regardless of all of that, it doesn't excuse your retarded behavior. Just admit you were wrong and shut the **** up. You can come back in a few days and say something stupid again.

Not enough to warrant locking her up, apparently, which was my stance the entire time. I haven't been wrong. There was nothing there to locking her up for any significant amount of time. At worst, she would've lost her clearance or gotten a fine.

the fact that you work for the DoD and say this just proves how full of **** you are, or why you need more Opsec training, another training module about IA, or how just straight up bad you are at your own job.

I pray you don't have a SIPRNET account or access

You know damn well what would happen to you if you sent even one classified email through your NMCI machine accidentally.

Not enough to warrant locking her up, apparently, which was my stance the entire time. I haven't been wrong. There was nothing there to locking her up for any significant amount of time. At worst, she would've lost her clearance or gotten a fine.