Etymologies

Examples

In this light, even the discussion about successors to Heinlein nags at me, because I see it, perhaps unfairly, as another aspect of trying to come up with easy categorization in a field where such categorization is anything but easy and where labels create false expectation after false expectation.

In this light, even the discussion about successors to Heinlein nags at me, because I see it, perhaps unfairly, as another aspect of trying to come up with easy categorization in a field where such categorization is anything but easy and where labels create false expectation after false expectation.

However, the historian María de Los Angeles Romero Frizzi suggests that "the linguistic categorization is somewhat misleading" partly because "the majority of indigenous peoples in Oaxaca identify more closely with their village or their community than with their ethnolinguistic group."

However, the historian María de Los Angeles Romero Frizzi suggests that "the linguistic categorization is somewhat misleading" partly because "the majority of indigenous peoples in Oaxaca identify more closely with their village or their community than with their ethnolinguistic group."

Before we answer that, it needs to be pointed out that, especially in the past century, such overarching categorization is ignoring a lot — neo-this and - that, jazz-classical hybrids, various nationalist styles, that whole Hindemith thing, &c.

However, the historian María de Los Angeles Romero Frizzi suggests that "the linguistic categorization is somewhat misleading" partly because "the majority of indigenous peoples in Oaxaca identify more closely with their village or their community than with their ethnolinguistic group."

However, the historian María de Los Angeles Romero Frizzi suggests that "the linguistic categorization is somewhat misleading" partly because "the majority of indigenous peoples in Oaxaca identify more closely with their village or their community than with their ethnolinguistic group."

Before we answer that, it needs to be pointed out that, especially in the past century, such overarching categorization is ignoring a lot — neo-this and - that, jazz-classical hybrids, various nationalist styles, that whole Hindemith thing, &c.

I'm not a big believer in categorization, my own self, except in the sense of "I read a book (x-- let's pick War for the Oaks, as for many people it's * the* type example of what they mean when they say" urban fantasy ") and I loved it; what else can I read that's like War for the Oaks?"