We appreciate the enormous support that our ABestWeb community has experienced over the many years it has served its members and sponsors. We have decided to exit this business and have placed the property up for sale and we are actively entertaining interest.

In the meantime, community members will be able to read but not post to ABestWeb beginning on Jan. 18.

We want to thank you for your numerous contributions and your ongoing support. If you have any questions, please let us know.

Could a few of you do me a favor? Would you pull up Performance Reports in CJ and do Exact Period, Nov. 1-23 of 2004, then do Dec. 1-23 of 2004? I'm seeing only 10% of my actual sales and commissions coming up for that period and both months come up identical in amounts for each web site.

There is something not right with reporting. I've contacted AAQ about it, but they ignored it in their response to me today.

Anyway, if I could get a couple of you to confirm this, maybe I can check some other periods and give CJ a whole list of problem dates for them to look at.

I ran the reports as you requsted. Mind you, I don't have detailed info to compare it with for accuracy, but November seems way low. December seems accurate as I recall. Each month gives different data.

'Commission detail' for Jun 2005 should exists for only extended transactions.
For not extended transaction use 'transaction detail' report.

I verified ripe's comment, I can see in "transaction detail" reports all individual transactions for that month from Nov 2004 to May 2005.

For June however the "transaction detail" report is missing transactions from two merchants that closed transaction 30 days later than the others. These missing transactions appear in my June "commission detail" report.

What shows up in my July transaction reports is only publisher payments, performance incentives and reversals. Most of my July transactions still appear in my "commission detail" report.

For August "transaction detail" a summary total for the previous month appears, when you click on "details" in the far right column, a commission detail opens up with all the individual transactions that represent that total amount BUT this is for July transactions that were paid to CJ for August payment.

September and October "transaction detail" reports have summary totals from the previous month.

It appears that in CJs August "upgrade" they decided to use what now is referred to "commission detail" reports as "transaction detail' for prior months to August rather than try to re-create the data as how it would appear in the new reports.

However this has resulted in hybrid reporting for June, July, and August.

Would be nice if Todd stepped up and explained this accurately, first hand and in detail. Probably doesn't want to because he has been burned so often when he does try. Safer to stay silent.