Tuesday, September 22, 2015

One of the more commonly perpetuated myths
around the Holocaust is that the Nazis held a conference in the Berlin suburb
of Wannsee on January 20, 1942, where the “extermination of the Jews was
planned.”

“There, on January 20, 1942, after a hearty
meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how to exterminate the Jewish
people. The detailed minutes of that meeting have been preserved by successive
German governments. Here is a copy of those minutes, in which the Nazis issued
precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews. Is this
a lie?”

The simple answer to Netanyahu’s question
is, yes, this is a lie. An outright, shameless, blatant lie.

- The Wannsee meeting and its minutes do
not contain a master plan to kill Jews;

- Nowhere in the meeting’s minutes is
genocide discussed, planned, proposed, or even suggested;

- The Wannsee meeting never discussed gas
chambers, shootings, or any of the fantasies propagated by the
exterminationists;

- The Wannsee Minutes reported that there
were only 4.5 million Jews under German control (yet 4.3 million Jewish
compensation claims have been lodged against the postwar German government);

- The Wannsee meeting was a planning
meeting on how Europe’s Jews should be deported, via transit camps, to the
East; with able-bodied Jews being forced to build roads and other labor
intensive tasks in those regions;

- The Wannsee Conference also made
allowance for specific exceptions to Jewish evacuation, such as Jewish German
World War I veterans; ALL Jews over the age of 65; and ALL Jews working in
industries vital to the German war effort, to be released from the threat of evacuation
and be allowed to stay in Germany.

There is therefore, no justification for
the allegation that the Wannsee Conference was a ‘master plan for mass murder’
and everyone who claims this to be the case, from Netanyahu down, is simply
lying.

That the Wannsee Conference never discussed
killing Jews in any way, has actually been confirmed in public by Yehuda Bauer,
professor of Holocaust Studies at the Avraham Harman Institute of
Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Bauer is also the founding editor of the
journal Holocaust and Genocide
Studies, and a member of the editorial board of the Encyclopaedia of the Holocaust,
published by Yad Vashem in 1990.

He is not, therefore, as some
Holocaust storytellers claim, some obscure figure, but a leading and major—in
fact, one of the most senior—Jews promoting the Holocaust fable.

As long ago as 1992(!), Bauer, speaking at
a conference held in London to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Wannsee
meeting, told the audience that the claim that Wannsee was a “master plan” to
kill Jews was nothing a but a “silly story.”

Bauer’s remarks were reported in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of January 23,
1992, and the Canadian Jewish Times
of January 30, 1992.

London (JTA)—An Israeli Holocaust scholar
has de-bunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to
have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of
the ‘Final Solution.’

According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer of the
Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, ‘but hardly a
conference’, and ‘little of what was said there was executed in detail.’

Bauer addressed the opening session of an
international conference held here to mark the 50th anniversary of the decision
to carry out the "Final Solution". "But it was not made at
Wannsee", the Czech born scholar said.

"The public still repeats, time after
time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived
at, Wannsee was but a stage in the unfolding of the process of mass
murder," he said.

His comments were repeated in the Canadian Jewish News, which read as
follows:

Wannsee’s importance rejected

London (JTA) — An Israeli Holocaust scholar
has debunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to
have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of
the “Final Solution.”

According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer (photo) of
the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, “but hardly a
conference”, and “little of what was said there was executed in detail.”

“The public still repeats, time after time,
the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at.”

In other words, even the leading “Holocaust
scholar” in Israel knows that to claim that the Wannsee Conference was all
about “killing Jews,”or as Netanyahu told the United Nations, that the minutes
contain “precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews
. . .” is an outright lie, a "silly story."

Once again, like everything else associated
with the “Holocaust,” the Wannsee Conference myth collapses when subjected to
even the most basic investigation.

Saturday, September 5, 2015

In the very last section of The Six
Million: Fact or Fiction, I put forward the reasons why the Holocaust
Storytellers continue with the “gassed six million” fable, concluding that:

Finally, “the Holocaust” has served as a
tool for those who seek to suppress any discussion of race, immigration, or
ethnic issues.

This last factor has led to, for example,
any group which advocates the preservation of its national identity or
homogeneity, being dismissed as “Nazi” and therefore “one step away from the
gas chambers.”

The recent events surrounding the ongoing
flooding of Europe with “migrants” (and I use that word advisedly, because it
certainly seems that many of them are actually just opportunistic illegal
immigrants) have turned out to be a case in point—and have shown the accuracy
of my point.

According to an article that has now
appeared in the New York Times, we
find that a significant number of major Jewish organizations in the US have
announced that any European who is opposed to the current “migrant” flow is
only doing so because they are not “aware of the Holocaust.”

“It was horrifying when I saw those images
of police putting numbers on people’s arms,” said Robert Frolich, the chief
rabbi of Hungary. “It reminded me of Auschwitz. And then putting people on a
train with armed guards to take them to a camp where they are closed in? Of course
there are echoes of the Holocaust.”

Europeans are facing one of the Continent’s
worst humanitarian crises since World War II, yet many seem blind to
images that recall that blackest time in their history.

This migrant crisis is no genocide. The issue
throughout the Continent is how to register, house, resettle or repatriate
hundreds of thousands of migrants and refugees, a daunting logistical
challenge. But perhaps not since the Jews were rounded up by Nazi Germany have
there been as many images coming out of Europe of people locked into trains,
babies handed over barbed wire, men in military gear herding large crowds of
bedraggled men, women and children.

At the same time, the images may reveal a
deeper truth about Europe and its seeming unpreparedness for a crisis so long
in the making: While extolling the virtues of human rights and humanism, it
remains, in many parts, a place resistant to immigration and diversity.

As a result, some here are reacting in ways
that recall some of the Continent’s darkest impulses.

“They must be oblivious because who would
do that if they had any historical memory whatsoever,” said Kenneth Roth,
executive director of Human Rights Watch. “It’s amazing, really. Certainly
those images of the trains can’t help but conjure up nightmares of the
Holocaust.”

But for others, the fact that it was not
done on purpose was even more frightening, showing a puzzling historical
disconnect in many of the very places that the Holocaust caused the deepest
devastation.

“It
may be correct that they didn’t know, but the insensitivity and the ignorance
of the imagery their actions evoked is stunning; it’s just sickening,” said
Jonathan Greenblatt, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, in New
York.

For many migrant advocates, what is so
puzzling about this historical amnesia is that the countries taking the hardest
line are among those that suffered the most during World War II and produced
the most refugees in the war’s aftermath.

“It’s hard to understand how people lose
their sense of history so quickly,” said Andrew Stroehlein, European media
director for Human Rights Watch.“We all say we have learned the lessons of
history, but to be turning away these desperate people who are fleeing a
horrific situation suggests that we haven’t learned the lessons at all.”

It should not be necessary for me to point
out that Kenneth Roth, Jonathan Greenblatt, and Andrew Stroehlein are all
Jewish.

So there you have it: if you don’t accept
the migrant flow, you are repeating the Holocaust—exactly the type of tactic I
pointed out in my book.

It is sad to see the tragedy of current
events in the Middle East and its results in Europe become the subject of yet
more “Holocaust” blackmail: and this
makes it even more imperative that the fable of the “six million” be squashed
once and for all.

The time has come to end forever the silly
“debate” on the claimed existence of a “gas chamber” at Auschwitz I.

The alleged "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I, complete with fake "chimney," as shown to tourists.

The alleged "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I, photographed in 1945 after the German defeat, showing no "chimney."

Let’s be absolutely clear about this: this
“gas chamber” — still the “main” tourist attraction in the entire Auschwitz
legend, through which literally millions of unsuspecting tourists have tramped —
is a post-war fabrication from start to finish.

Anyone who had any doubts about can do
themselves a favor and consult even the Holocaust Storytellers’ own accounts.

Take as one example a leading Holocaustian
Robert van Pelt, who wrote as follows in his book The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial as follows:

“With its chimney and its gas chamber, the
crematorium functions as the solemn conclusion for tours through the camp. Visitors are not told that crematorium they
see is largely a post-war reconstruction.

“When Auschwitz was transformed into a
museum after the war, the decision was taken to concentrate the history of the whole
complex in one of its component parts. The infamous crematoria where the mass
murders had taken place were ruins in Birkenau, two miles away. The committee
felt that a crematorium was required at the end of the memorial journey, and
crematorium I was reconstructed to speak of the history of the incinerators at
Birkenau. This program of usurpation was rather detailed. A chimney, the ultimate symbol of Birkenau, was re-created; four
hatched openings in the roof, as if for pouring Zyklon-B into the gas chamber
below, were installed, and two of the three furnaces were rebuilt using
original parts. There are no signs to explain these restitutions, they were not
marked at the time, and the guides remain silent about it when they take
visitors through this building that is presumed by the tourist to be the place
where it happened.” - Robert van Pelt, The
Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial, (Indiana University
Press, 2002, ISBN 978-0253340160), page 121.

So there you have it, from the horse’s
mouth as it were.

Everything in the “gas chamber” at
Auschwitz I: the ovens, the unattached chimney, and the “Zyklon-B insertion
holes” in the ceiling are post-war additions. Everything.

Let’s
not even argue about this any further.

The fake "Zyklon B insertion holes" on the roof of the alleged "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I: Built in 1947, the camp museum and official Holocaust storytellers now admit.

The "recreated" ovens in the alleged "gas chamber" building at Auschwitz I: another post-war (1947) addition, now admitted to by the camp museum and all official Holocaust storytellers.

As a matter of interest, the Auschwitz
Museum has been steadily forced to retract its position on this “gas chamber”
over the years.

The official Auschwitz Camp Museum,website in 2006 admitted that the "chimney" and "two incinerators" had been added to the building after the war.

Up to 2006, the official Auschwitz Museum
website claimed that this “gas chamber” was first used in the “autumn of 1941”
and was used to “kill thousands of newly arrived Jews, as well as several
groups of Soviet POWs.”

This continued, the 2006 Auschwitz Museum
website continued, until July 1943, when the “incinerators, chimney, and some
walls were dismantled and the holes in the roof, through which the SS men had
poured Zyklon B, were sealed.

“After the war, the Museum carried out a
partial reconstruction. The chimney and two incinerators were rebuilt using
original components, as were several openings in the gas chamber roof.”

So in fact, the official Auschwitz Museum
admitted as early as 2006 that the “gas chamber” had been rebuilt, although
they still continued to claim that it had actually been a gas chamber.

The growth of the internet served to
sabotage these claims, and by 2012, the Auschwitz Museum had updated its
website description of the Auschwitz I “gas chamber” as follows:

Gas Chamger[sic] and Crematory I.Soon after taking this picture the crematory chimney was recreated,
one door was removed and the bricked window was uncovered. It was done to recreate the crematory exterior look.”

In 2012, the Auschwitz Camp Museum website admitted even more post-war "reconstructions" to the alleged "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I.

Once again, the official Auschwitz Museum
website admitted that the building had been “recreated” and although
they still called it a “gas chamber” they were far less forthcoming about the
details and date of operation as they had been in 2006.

In 2015, the Auschwitz Museum website had
once again “updated” their page on Auschwitz I to completely remove any
reference to a “gas chamber,” although separate documentation they put out
still claims that it was used as an “experimental gas chamber.”

So, although

- The
Holocaust Storytellers freely admit that the “chimney, ovens, Zyklon B holes in
the roof, and doors” were all built in 1947; and

- The problems involved in using this room
as a “gas chamber” are obvious to anyone with a modicum of logic — for example,
it is located right in front of the main entrance, the camp hospital (!), and
in full view of the main road and the passing locals;

. .
. the Holocaust Storytellers still insist that it was used as a “gas chamber” .
. . One has to wonder just how stupid they think people are to believe their nonsense.