Pages

Saturday, March 7, 2015

Group Projects--Preparing Students for a Communist Utopia

One of the early lessons
schoolchildren are taught is to do their own work and not copy from other's
papers. There is a trend, however, that is on the rise at all levels of
education from preschool through graduate school: the group project. Unlike a
group activity or discussion during class time, the group project assigns one
group grade to several students.

Collaboration versus Freeloading

Groups of scholars through the ages have read
and discussed ideas. Students have traditionally been admonished by their
teachers to do their own work and to work hard in order to learn new skills.
Students have always had discussions among themselves and have tutored others
who needed help with difficult concepts. Most importantly, students were responsible
for their own work, or lack thereof, and held responsible through a system of
grading meant to evaluate individual achievement. It is interesting that
professors who rightly devote several syllabus pages to the evils of plagiarism,then turn around and tell students
they will be graded, in part, on work done by other people. Once a group grade
is assigned, the project moves from scholarly collaboration to
teacher-sanctioned freeloading by low-performing group members at the expense
of high-performing members.

Academic Socialism

Like economic socialism, group projects force
some people to work for the benefit of other people without just compensation
for their efforts. Furthermore, group projects assign responsibility for
outcomes without corresponding authority to enforce the necessary discipline to
complete the project successfully. Responsible and competent students have
nothing to gain from a group project, unless they are able to select only other
responsible and competent people as group members. Irresponsible or incompetent
students have nothing to lose from a group project; if they are in the lower
half of the class, odds are in their favor that other group members will make
them look competent and responsible in order to preserve their own grade point
averages.

Like the producers inAtlas Shruggedby Ayn Rand, good students will just
keep working harder, dragging the slackers along because they see no other
choice. The slackers will relax, complacent, knowing the producers will not let
them fail because the producers care about the outcome. Like the characters in
Kurt Vonnegut'sHarrison
Bergeron, the best students are handicapped so that they cannot appear more
competent than others.

Real Life versus Group Project

One argument instructors use to justify graded
group projects is that such projects prepare students for real life. This is
simply not true. In the world outside the classroom, people do work in groups;
however, the similarity ends there. In the real world, somebody in the group
has authority to make decisions and enforce them, to evaluate or promote, to
retain or to dismiss group members. In the real world, the slackers are often
exposed and fired. Real world companies cannot afford to pay people for doing
nothing. Companies that insist on paying everyone in a group the same,
regardless of performance, will lose their best workers to companies that
encourage and reward excellence.

Instructors who want to prepare students for
real life should concentrate on teaching skills to all students, evaluating
them as individuals, and offering extra help to those who learn more slowly.
Group discussion and collaboration should be encouraged as a valuable life
skill. Nobody, however, should be allowed to claim a grade earned by others. Graded
group projects are not an honest assessment tool.