The opening sentence of an article titled Non-Monogamy: Do Open Relationships Work? is “Non-monogamy is about one thingâ€“sex.” If that’s true, does it mean that monogamy is not about sex? Or that non-monogamy can’t be about things other than sex? Sadly, this poorly written article continues with the sex-negative rhetoric, lumping all non-monogamous (also called polyamorous or poly or open) relationships into one nymphomaniac category that the author, working on assumptions rather than research, opposes to The One True Way, Monogamy.

Yes, it is that much of a train wreck. But once I was done foaming at the mouth at the author’s offensive stereotypes, I realized that this provides a valuable opportunity to discuss topics that are pertinent to monogamy, non-monogamy, and the spectrum of relationship behaviors and choices in between the two. This will be the first of two essays (or more, if my eyes don’t bleed from rereading that horrific article) exploring these issues.

Simply deconstructing that first line, that non-monogamy is only about sex, could be an article in and of itself, so it’s what I’ll focus on in this first essay. Is anything just about sex? Is even sex just about sex? Because we exist within culture, and culture is an abstract symbolic web of meanings through which we assign value to our actions and beliefs, nothing is ever so simple as it appears. Even physical acts like sex or eating are not simply physical acts: they also have emotional meanings, spiritual resonances, ways of fitting within our worldview and connecting us to the people and world around us (this is my anthropology background speaking, ain’t it grand?). And since I’m a huge social constructivist, I believe that the social meanings of actions are determined largely by society, not by any natural or inherent rules. So sex is always about more than sex, and its meanings are constructed by the people experiencing it (sometimes this is an active, willful process, and sometimes the meanings we inherit from tradition are the ones that determine how we experience something). If sex is more than the sum of its parts–more than the sum of the sweaty bits and panting and bodily fluids going into the act–then sex between people, whether monogamous or not, will always mean more than just sex.

Granted, some sex is mostly just about the sex. Some people like one-night stands, in the context of being single or polyamorous or cheating. Some people, whether in a monogamous relationship or not, just want to have a pleasurable, intimate experience. Some people know that they sleep better after an orgasm. My point is, even when sex is being reduced more or less to its parts, that it’s okay to want sex for its own sake. Desiring and initiating and enjoying sex is something that lots of people, whether they identify as monogamous or not, tend to do. Wanting sex, despite the sex-negative rhetoric of contemporary American culture, is not an inherently slutty or poly thing.

The other aspect of the “poly = sex” statement I’d like to address is about the emotional ramifications of non-monogamy. As research on non-monogamy has shown, all romantic relationships have sexual, emotional, and practical concerns: poly folks are welcome to seek any of the three elements elsewhere, whereas the monogamous partner or soulmate is supposed to provide everything for their other half. But even couples in happily monogamous relationships get some emotional support outside the relationship, whether in the form of family gatherings, coffee with friends, or venting to workout buddies. In that sense, non-monogamous relationships aren’t so different.

Thus, to reduce non-monogamous relationships to just being about sex is to ignore the multiple ways in which humans can meet one another’s needs and feel drawn to interact with one another, sexually or not. People can have strong feelings for each other that can be classified as romantic, but may never be expressed sexually. Many friendships have flirtatious elements but are not consummated sexually. Similarly, sometimes non-monogamous folks want to have the freedom to go on dates with people outside their primary relationships–sometimes it’s about the sex, yes, but sometimes it’s also about enjoying the company of someone new, someone fun to hang out with while unburdened by the baggage of a long-term relationship.

Stay tuned for another essay unpacking more of the assumptions informing beliefs about how monogamy and non-monogamy are different.

Follow us on Twitter @mysexprofessor. Follow Jeana, the author of this post, @foxyfolklorist.

More About

On January 1, I sent out my first newsletter. Over the past few years, I’ve dedicated more of my research to understanding how sex, intimacy, and affection fit together, so it seemed fitting to share this with subscribers. If you’d [...]

As I’ve blogged about before, queer and poly relationships actually have a lot of communication strategies to offer straight, monogamous, and vanilla relationships (not to mention the fact that a world where every kind of relationship is not only tolerated [...]

Perhaps I should clarify: compulsory monogamy is already mainstream. It’s already the norm, and a largely unexamined one at that. What I mean to discuss here is how the idea of compulsory monogamy is now under discussion in the mainstream, thanks [...]

Molly Ren’s post at The Frisky about the ridiculous assumptions people make about BDSM/kink got a chuckle out of me. Yes, a lot of folks assume that practitioners of BDSM (short for bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, and sadism [...]

Previous Story

Next Story

Monogamy prevents one from enjoying the company of any but the spouse.

http://twitter.com/foxyfolklorist Jeana Jorgensen

Monogamy done wrong, yes. I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with monogamy, but it can be practiced oppressively.

http://amazon.mostcuriousthing.com/wordpress/ Amazon Syren

I’m in an open relationship — that is, I have one primary partner, and we both have the freedom to date/flirt-with/fuck other people outside of our relationship.

As it happens, neither of us excersises that freedom all that frequently.

So why are we “open”, then?

For me, it’s less about the opportunity to fool around with others than it is about the chance to be fully myself with my partner. I can sigh over crushes with her. We can check out other women together. I don’t have to hide my nature from my partner in order to “keep the peace”.

To use a really clunky metaphore:
Monogamy feels like… Like realizing that chocolate-peanut-butter-cup ice cream is my favourite, and simultaneously finding out that – now that I’ve determined my favourite – I can’t even *wonder* about what, say, mint-chocolate-chip might taste like, let alone talk to my partner about my speculations.

And maybe that’s because my experiences with monogamy have been rather on the insecure and controlling end of the spectrum. But I find that I’m a much, much happier person when I can just *tell* my partner “I’ve really got the hots for so-and-so person who we know in real life” and know that this is okay and an acceptable part of our relationship.

Donating = Kindness

This site is supported by my time and work and by the people, like you, who come here for information. Thank you for your donation, in any amount, to support broad conversations about sexuality.

My Sex Professor

In Case You Missed It

October 11th was National Coming Out Day, which was established after the 1987 March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights. This celebration of identity is intended to promote equality, safety, and tolerance for all, regardless of sexual identity.

I have several friends who are medical professionals, as well as a few friends who work as patient instructors. They teach nursing, nurse practitioner, and medical students how to give medical exams by playing the role of a patient.