Sean Penn:’ Some of my best good chortles have come out of the worst examines’

The actor turned author speaks his intellect about critics, insolent succour piece, the mania-led #MeToo action, and why his ex-wives find him boring

Sean Penn moves into a low-key eatery not far from his house and slides undetected into a seat at the back. It is a misty day in Malibu, 15 miles north of LA, and the actor appears in familiar, I-don’t-care guise: beat-up leather casing, brushfire fuzz( which, in light of the views he will air about female egotism in Hollywood, I feel bound to report may be more vibrant than sort planned ), with the skittish energy of a mortal who has stood for too long next to very loud loudspeakers. The 57 -year-old responds me affably, to my surprise: while Penn may be long admired for his acting, he is disparaged for almost everything else. He is known to be irascible, short-tempered, long-winded, a husband who yells at photographers and fumes on TV. And now he has written a lunatic novel.” It’s the most fun I’ve had professionally ,” he squawks and bends back in his chair.

A few periods before our fit, Bob Honey Who Just Do Stuff was the subject of a full-page newspaper ad in which the publishers, preferably cleverly, moved strings from the book’s worst reviews and requested readers to make up their own recollections. The tale, which follows the escapades of its eponymous hero as he goes around selling septic tanks and assassinating old people, is a satire of American consumer culture and the religion of persona, and for weeks its excess have been gleefully documented. Penn writes as if every statement has been put through a thesaurus: for “face”, spoke” dermal disguise “; for “quiet”, ” lingering concert of silence “; a man with good hearing has ” extraordinary auditory augmentation efficiency “. So it goes on, until we are to achieve:” Effervescence lived in her every cellular expres, and she had spizzerinctum to spare .”

Cherrypicking these follies has provided us with a moderately good titter, but here’s the odd thing: taken as a whole, there is something quite stimulating about Bob Honey, a hallucinatory effect that realizes the novel at times nearly looks a lot like a piece of achievement prowes. Linger long enough in the nations of the world of Penn’s prose and one starts to lose all buy on actuality, a sort of mentality slip that Penn contends was intentional.” It was meant to be challenging ,” he says.” Meant to have you stop-the-rhythm to go and look something up .” If he talks in a word fog, it is because he favors” to be understood by osmosis. If I’m being brief, I presume[ parties] will fill in, or if I am not being brief”- the far greater likelihood, on the evidence of our chat-” the tangents would be connected by the other person .” He hoped the book might work along same lines.

Has he verified the worst reviews?” I have a sense of them. It’s keep-your-day-job shit. A bunch of children, schadenfreude, whatever. And in the end, some of the best chortles I’ve got have been the one-liners that have come out of the worst reviews .”

The latter, taken two years ago when Penn interviewed El Chapo for Rolling Stone, made down on his head almost as much opprobrium as Bob Honey, for its perceived amateurism and for the lane it seemed to apologise for a soul with so much better blood on his hands. Penn remains unrepentant.” Just because someone writes about trash doesn’t mean they know about it. I know parents who don’t know their own families. Most of these reporters on this subject know fucking nothing and most never speak my segment. They spoke the excerpts. Then you get a talking head like a Don Winslow[ on CNN ], I’ve spoke his journals handle to report and he’s a functioning twit, and parties think he’s something. That’s their resident expert. It’s like Henry Kissinger is their occupant expert .”

The gung-ho activism is more complicated and, on closer inspection, much more admirable than the caricature hints. If there is instance for Penn wading into a position about which he knows nothing and nailing it through sheer bloody-mindedness, it is here, in its own experience with aid.

In 2010, Penn went to Haiti in the wake of the destroying earthquake and set up the J/ P Haitian Relief Organization, an busines that has, by all accounts, been enormously successful and facilitated thousands of Haitians find shelter and medical succour. In a piece in the New York Times in 2011, by which occasion Penn had been in Haiti for nearly a year, veteran succour craftsmen lined up to praise him. The question of what he was doing in Haiti in the first place has roots in his inability to find equilibrium at home. The most persuasive pieces in Bob Honey are those in which Penn writes of his character’s insomnia. When I ask if this comes from experience, he takes a big breather.” So this goes back as far as I, or my mother, can remember. I was born at 3.45 am and I generally fall asleep at 3.45 am. I’ve been to Zen centres, done sleep studies, everything. I could never get myself to go to sleep. I’d get up, sometimes, with no sleep at all. And I was getting older, so I wasn’t able to push through this thing mentally .” Eventually a doctor prescribed Ambien:” But it doesn’t work like it used to. It doesn’t prevent me sleeping, but I get to sleep and at least get 3 hour. Then you’re watching the clock for the time you were supposed to get up, and it’s getting closer and closer .”

Some of Penn’s wilder behaviour obliges more sense, perhaps, when looking back on in the purposes of the a boy who has never had more than three unbroken hours’ sleep.

” There’s been a lot of that in my life ,” Penn says and he associates it, obliquely, to how he is able to function effectively in a destabilised home such as Haiti after the quake.” I reckon tragedy is capable of being hurry. I find myself exiting calm, and being expecting. I can bring an American arrogance to anywhere in the world .” He smiles.” Look, in the movie business you tell your gang:’ I require this set done yesterday .’ When I got to Haiti and I saw how NGOs labor, it would be like:’ This case requirement this , now, and this is the person to get in contact with .’ Then I had six other parties asking me six interesting thing. When I circled back half an hour subsequently to the first one and said,’ Did you get it ?’ “theyre saying”,’ We’re waiting for a response, we mailed an email .’ I said,’ You moved an email? Throw me your telephone, I’m going to call .’ And it drove me fucking mad .”

Pretty swiftly, Penn’s outfit became known as an bureau that got things done quicker than the NGOs and he calls it” the easiest various kinds of work to do in emergency cases, because it’s emergency related “. It was triage. He gestures.” It’s the most wonderful, commonsense undertaking. There’s a kid in the street, a truck’s going to smacked it, do you know that the sidewalk is clear of paedophiles? No. I’ll clear my apologies eventually .”

It is fascinating that the self-important urging of a Hollywood movie set can be translated to a disaster zone, but think about it, Penn says:” It’s the same business, the stakes are higher .” There’s even overlap with the sanitation logistics of shooting a movie.” You’ve gotta get porta potties for beings .”

In his own organisation, Penn had a policy of” no patience” right down to the rule that” if you inhale one joint, you’re fired “. In happening he culminated up loosening the doses regulation for his indigenous works, because” how am I limiting that when my local laborers went back to their homes at night? I stopped being an dumb with that .” For the imports, mainly Americans or Brits, nonetheless,” You don’t come to this country to break the national laws .”

And when someone in his organisation did violate a general rule? Well, Penn says,” There’s no organisation, including my own, where you don’t have something happen. And you deal with it; you surely want to take it transparent .” The cover-up, he says, is the biggest problem.” I’ve known of situations where big organisations discovered something and did investigation into the cases, and shot person- and because they didn’t want a lawsuit from that person, another organisation would hire them; it’s like transferring on clergymen. In our organisation, I’d get on the phone to whoever the violator was and say,’ If I hear you are ever was seeking to get a job in one of these organisations, I’m coming to your residence city, and I’m going to rent out the movie theatre and indicate a documentary about you and make sure your mothers are there .'”

Why does he reckon an succour employee, who apparently is the beginning with good planneds, gets to the phase of manipulating desperate dames this practice?” I can have possibilities ,” Penn says,” but they’re the same ideologies one would apply to someone who abuses their children. How do you do that ?”

In light of these life-or-death stakes, Penn is unsympathetic to what he seems to regard as more unimportant abuses closer to home, particularly those involving luminary showing. A week before we fill, he showed in the gossip column for dining with Charlie Rose, the shamed former Tv multitude shot from PBS and CBS for unwarranted action around female personnel. Penn is not, it is safe to say, on board with #MeToo, which he describes as” not intellectually honest”,” a push is presided over by mania” and full of” self-aggrandisement and expressing “. At the end of Bob Honey, he writes a song representing Charlie Rose and appearing to mourn the demise of Louis CK.

Romantic relationships don’t seem to be Penn’s strong point. The worst chips of Bob Honey are those involving the character’s ex-wife, a harridan announced Helen, about whom he is so wicked, I had be questioned whether Penn’s own ex-wife might have commented on it. Penn gives me a dry seem.” Which ex-wife ?” he says.

Oh. I had temporarily forgotten about Madonna, to whom Penn was married from 1985 to 1989.” The baby of your kids ,” I say.( Penn and Robin Wright, who were married for 14 times, have Dylan and Hopper, both in their 20 s .)

” No; these personas are mergers of a lot of things and she’s not a attribute in the book .” Penn interrupts.” I don’t think the book would be either one of my ex-wives’ cup of tea. They both thought that I talked too much in ways that were too complicated .” He giggles.” I don’t have a lot of a discussion with my recent ex, but my first ex, we have a close friendship .”

What does he belief Madonna would say about the book?” I think if she was reading it, she’d say, ugh, I’ll read this some other time .”

Anyway, Penn says, returning to the subject of #MeToo,” I don’t ever want to be in a change. I don’t trust any progress. The anti-war crusade did not maintain. We’re back in campaigns .”

But going back to his friend Charlie, surely the lesson of this is: don’t stroll around naked in front of your staff if you don’t want to get sacked.” I don’t disagree with that ,” Penn says.” I go back to my original thing, which is that if that’s what the individual that happened to is asking for, then they have a law instance to go through, or the company has a decision to move. But when the company is moving that decision under the pressure of … a movement that is led by mania, I get worried for both[ areas ].”

There is a libertarian stripe in Penn that is impossible to miss. I recur a wince-making path from Bob Honey, which Penn almost certainly considers to be a radical account:” Getting older in America is tough on the status of women; understanding what she’ll do to avoid it is tough on a serviceman .” I premise Penn approved of Frances McDormand‘s unadorned form at the Oscars this year?

” I have a pretty good meaning. We grew celebritised ,” he says.” I don’t buy People periodical. But where individuals complain that someone took a picture of them or that their privacy is being invaded, I’m like, yeah? Fuck you. I exactly expended my entire adult life with you telling me that because I want to express myself as relevant actors, that that comes with the territory. Well, it comes with the territory for you , now, and you bought those fucking People periodicals. You constituted that happen .” He is punching his paw at me across the table.” When I go like this, I’m not at my best ,” he says.” So two sides that are not at their best, it gets very shallow .” Penn has a arrogance for the idea of the personal firebrand.” Labelling is being! Branding is being! The algorithm of modern binary existentialism ,” he writes in Bob Honey, a line I read out to him now.

“Yeah,” says Penn, lowering his eyes and examining sage.

What does” the algorithm of modern binary existentialism” signify? He clicks his eye open.” Well. Binary- two components. When you’re taking an algorithm that’s going to identify the two components, and, there are, I conclude I talk about in the book also … it’s America today .” There follows a long narration about how easy it is to buy constituents for a bombard in the US.

” I’ve just gone off on the word binary. But I think it’s self-explanatory, in there. Huh .”

Anyway, he says, the above reasons people voted for Trump is” because I think there’s a mental health problem in this country. It’s rage over rationale. There’s a lot going on that was going on in Nazi Germany; we’re observing scapegoats, radicals to detest, whether it be of a race, or so-called lefty Hollywood, so that’s part of why I want to write something- I only have my sense of humour to furnish. I didn’t want to precisely be angry all the time .”

And he isn’t. There is an underlying humour to Penn’s tirades that is often “ve lost” translation and while I find much of what he says absurd, pretentious and rarely delusional, to my surprise, I too find him amiable and funny- a genuine American eccentric.

As we get up to leave, I can’t help laughing.” Sorry. I hinder thinking about the facts of the case that Madonna thought you were boring .”

” I love her ,” Penn says, and giggles. Is she a good egg?” Such a good egg .”

We go outside to his pick-up truck and he initiates me to Flyboy, his six-month-old golden retriever. After Penn has get, I call a friend with a certain degree in doctrine.” Does’ the algorithm of modern binary existentialism’ represent anything ?” I request. After the laughter has died down, he says,” I think he intends … in modern life everything is black and white. But existentialism refers to a specific institution in logic; he surely simply means existence .” No matter; Penn has a lot more to say. Before leaving he told me: he is hard at work on Bob Honey, the sequel.

* Bob Honey Who Just Do Stuff by Sean Penn issued by Simon& Schuster at PS14. 99. To guild a copy for PS12. 74, go to guardianbookshop.com or announce 0330 333 6846.

Commenting on this fragment? If you would like your statement to be considered for inclusion on Weekend magazine’s notes page in photograph, please email weekend @theguardian. com, including your name and address( not for book ).