Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through
the Matrix on October the 9th, 2012.

For newcomers, as always I suggest you go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com,
and make good use of the site. There’s well over a thousand audios for free
download, where I go into the past. I bring the past to the present to show you
you’re living through a script; a script designed a long time ago by those who
pretty-well owned a good chunk of the planet and lots of its resources and how
they decided to take over the rest of it, too, using foundations as their
fronts, basically, which would employ armies of lobbyists and politicians. And
they formed the United Nations to be the umbrella group of course
(the big kind of formal world government idea) with its umbrella organizations
beneath it, to bring in this new global society. Science was to rise to the top
to manage us all in a scientific manner. And it’s been written about a long,
long time ago by the Fabian Society (another branch, really, of
the Royal Institute for International Affairs). The Fabian
Society pretends to handle the left-wing and they’re really into the scientific
dictatorship idea. Huxley talked about it; so did Lord
Bertrand Russell. And they said that this scientific tyranny would be
more of a tyranny than any that ever previously had existed (any other kind of
tyrannies), but he favored it, nonetheless. And that’s what you’re going into.
We’re managed, you see. This is the age of world-managers and we have so many
of them and so many organizations running us all our lives, minutely, that you
can’t even keep up with them. There’s so many getting well financed by the
foundations. So, help yourself to that. Find out how the whole system works.
Find out that nothing happens by chance. Wars are planned many, many, many
years ahead. And the boys at the top literally see the world as a big long-term
business project. That’s how it’s run by professionals.

Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. I
don’t bring on advertisers as guests. I don’t get cash from advertisers. I
don’t get money from any products sold outside of my own website, which is just
the books and the discs that I sell to keep me toddling along. So, if you want
to keep me going you can buy the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.
And you can also donate, as well, because that’s really the best thing to
do, in these austere times. And from the U.S. to Canada, remember you can still
use personal checks or international postal money orders. You can send cash or
use PayPal. Across the world, Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal. Remember,
straight donations are really, really awfully welcome.

And, as I say, it’s just an amazing thing to see people
here and there who start to catch on that something’s awfully wrong for the
first time. They tend to panic and then they run off to find out who’s got all
the information on it and then they panic all the more and they don’t know how
to handle it because they’ve never grown up understanding this system. It’s
been here your whole life, and your parents when they were born and before they
were born, even when your grandparents were alive, this system was in play with
the rich men of the world running the whole system because the big organization
that started it all became known as the Council on Foreign Relations
in America and across other parts of the world, and it was called the Royal
Institute for International Affairs in Britain, or London, I should
say. They have run the world for a hundred years and they plan to go on with it
too. And they recruit in every generation, their own type to carry it on. You
have to go into their sites and make good use of them. Just go in to the Rockefeller
Foundation and look at every aspect of the environment, population
reduction, everything you can imagine. They’ve got ongoing studies. They pay
scientists across the planet, universities to do studies, continuous studies to
do with us and how to control us. It’s all about that, ultimately... and
depopulation.

Now, that’s the music coming in, so I’ll go on with the
stories which will connect with what I’m talking about tonight, after these
messages.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
You don’t realize how much psychological tinkering you’ve had your whole life
long, through your education process and how many little questionnaires that
have been handed to you so they can really get your whole personality down on
pat, basically. And they claim that these things are pretty accurate, as to how
you’re going to end up in the different traits that you have. All that kind of
stuff. That all came out, again, of the eugenics movement that was tied at the
hip with psychiatry at that time and now they have geneticists themselves
attached to the whole thing. So, you have neuroscientists, psychologists,
psychiatry all involved in the same thing. Because it’s their job now to makes
sure we’re all... well the ones really who are possibly going to be criminals
and possibly going to be a nuisance to the State (they won’t be well-behaved),
should be eliminated at birth. We know that, from the articles I’ve read just
over the last couple of days. They’re talking about all of that: removing genes
from sperm and ovum to create the perfect kind of morons that will be happy in
this world system, run by their betters. And they use test countries for all
these different things. Scotland’s one of the main ones for their testing of
all this, this Fabian technique. Because the Fabians talked about that, when
they started up their organization a long time ago, founded by the money from
the Astor family (Lord Astor). And Lord Astor also was in with
the Royal Institute for International Affairs (at that time it
was the Milner Group).

Here’s an article here. I read it last year, by the way,
but it’s interesting, it ties in with what’s been happening lately with all the
talk now, to modify us before we’re even born. It says,

“Scottish toddlers to be
tested to see if they will grow up to be drug addicts or criminals”

Alan: This is a law, folks. And it says,

“Children aged between 24
and 30 months will be examined to determine their capacity for violent crime,
drug abuse and mental illness when they are older. Health officials will look
for emotional and behavioural problems under the scheme, which will be launched
in Glasgow this year.”

“The move comes amid growing
concern that those most at risk of developing violent tendencies or chronic
addictions are not being identified early enough. Experts...”

Alan: You know, these experts again.

“... hope the Healthy Child
programme...”

Alan: They call it “Healthy Child.” {Laughs}

“...will help tackle levels
of violence and drug abuse in Glasgow, which are among the worst in the world.
Dr Phil Wilson, a GP...”

Alan: General practitioner, that’s a doctor.

“...who is part of a working
group behind the project, said: ‘One of the really worrying things is that on
the overall measures of child well-being that Unicef publishes...’”

Alan: It’s from the United Nations, of course.

“‘...Scotland is bottom of
the league of developed countries.’”

Alan: Because they’ve been kept in utter poverty
all these years. That’s why they’re at the bottom, folks. There’s no work left
there.

“Under the scheme, health
workers will complete a questionnaire with parents to establish if their
children are aggressive, bullying, spiteful and if they lie or cheat.”

Alan: If they do, they might get a job in politics.

“Toddlers will also be
checked for poor grasp of language, which can indicate problems such as
attention deficit disorder. The parents of those who fall into the "at
risk" group will be offered support.”

Alan: They also drug the children, of course.

“Glasgow SNP [Scottish
National Party] MSP Sandra White said she was concerned that children could be
pigeon-holed.”

Alan: Well, that’s exactly what they’re going to do
with it, folks. Birth to death, they want to do this to. She says,

“‘We are looking at a stage
of development when young children do misbehave and are prone to tantrums. I
would be worried that young children will be labelled unnecessarily and
unfairly.’ But Dr Wilson, a senior lecturer in infant mental health at Glasgow
University, defended the scheme. He said: ‘It is important that this programme
is seen as an exercise in giving children the best chance.’”

Alan: You understand how it’s all perception
management, what they want to do to you. It’s to help the children and give
them the best chance.

“Senior health officials
warn that only a small minority of people with anti-social or behavioural
problems are picked up by health or social services as young children.
Long-term studies have found links with poor mental health in pre-school kids
and violence in later life.”

Alan: And then they pop into the...

“Swedish study has shown
that children of 30 months who could not put two words together and who had a
vocabulary of fewer than 50 words had a 70 per cent probability of having a
psychiatric diagnosis.”

Alan: Well I know children today all across America
and Canada that are lucky to have fifty words they can put together. And it’s
getting worse all the time: linguistic minimalism.

And then this article here, too, is the same thing:

“Glasgow Parenting Support
Framework Evaluation. The implementation of a public health approach to
parenting support in Glasgow, with its National Health Service
infrastructure... ”

Alan: See, it’s all about the National Health
Service that’s all in cahoots with UNICEF on this and
America (the U.S.) is going to go into its National Health system. This is what
it’s all about. It’s nothing to do with a better system for the people. It’s so
as they can monitor you, exploit you, stick a lot of needles in your arms and
give you drugs and all that kind of stuff, and label people as potential future
problems. It says,

“We aim to establish the
effectiveness of the Glasgow Parenting Support Framework. The main part
of our research assesses the emotional and social wellbeing of children from
aged 30 months until the age of ten using the Strengths and Difficulties
Questionnaire...”

Alan: Now, there’s another program that they have
that takes over from that and goes on for the whole of your life, by the way.
But I’ll put these up. And it talks about all the data collection that they’ve
got as well on all of this. And every child is going to have all their data,
day by day, stuck into this computer system. Great stuff, eh? That’s coming to
be worldwide, you understand. This is a test bed for worldwide stuff. And
Sarkozy was even involved in the setting up of this system in Britain.

And we all remember (some of us remember), the New
American Century crew. It was a doublespeak to hide something. A lot of
folk had dual citizenship that were all around Bush Jr. A lot of them had dual
citizenship with the U.S. and Israel; that was well known. It was in all the
press. Etc etc. And so naturally, they were all for Israel first, in other
words too. It seems that Romney... and this is a Foreign Relations,
CFR article, by the way, but he is going through the same stuff,
because that’s his job, not that Obama hasn’t. Obama simply took over the New
American Century and he took out a few countries and started up another one,
ready to fall as well. And in will come the next knight in shining armor when
you’re fed up with Obama and it’s the same thing all over again, the New
American Century group behind Romney. It says,

“Can Romney Put Foreign
Policy in Play?”

Alan: It says. CFR.

“In the first foreign policy
speech following his momentum-gaining debate against President Barack Obama,
GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney expanded on his vision of an ‘American
century...’”

Alan: There you are: a new American century.

“... a view he tied to the
legacy of leaders like General George Marshall as he outlined a muscular, moral
U.S. foreign policy with American exceptionalism at its core.”

Alan: Which means nothing at all.

“Romney aimed to distinguish
his world view from the president’s... ”

Alan: That’s Obama’s.

“... as he has in
far-lower-profile foreign policy speeches, promising to "change
course" in the Middle East by helping to provide arms to Syrian rebels ”

Alan: Well, Obama’s already doing that.

“... and talking and acting
even tougher on Iran.”

Alan: Well, you have to do that because he went
over to Israel to get the kiss of Netanyahu and that was in the mainstream
papers. That’s who’s backing them all. He says,

“‘It is the responsibility
of our president,’ Romney said Monday at the Virginia Military Institute, ‘to
use America’s great power to shape history – not to lead from behind, leaving
our destiny at the mercy of events.’”

Alan: That’s exactly what they said with the New
American Century group.

“‘Unfortunately, that is
exactly where we find ourselves in the Middle East under President Obama.’”

Alan: It says,

“Romney wove together a
constellation of tumultuous events in the Middle East that he said has left
‘the risk of conflict in the region’ higher ‘now than when the president took
office.’ And he promised what amounted to a middle ground between President
George W. Bush’s activist ‘freedom agenda’...”

Alan: “Freedom agenda” was also called
“revolutionary democracy,” where you go and invade them and you force democracy
on them. That what we’ve been doing.

“... and the pragmatic and
downsized ambitions of an America exhausted and depleted by two wars in one
decade.”

Alan: Never minding Gulf War I. It was a
continuation of Gulf War I. That’s like twenty-odd years. So, anyway, it’s the
same old thing so that the New American Century is back in the saddle. And
there’s some interesting things, too. I’ll put up one from Veterans Today. They
really bash the guys that are behind Romney as well and say much the same
thing. It’s the same bunch in behind Romney. And they do mention a few things.
A lot of people won’t like this article but they do mention a few things.

“And what’s worse...”

Alan: It says,

“... they control most of
the United States Federal Court system and mainstream media, and are running
the campaign of presidential candidate Mitt Romney.”

Alan: It says,

“Romney’s top foreign policy
advisor is Rabbi Dov Zakheim, one of the leading suspected hands-on designers
and controllers of the... ”

Alan: They call it:

“... Israeli-instigated 9/11
false-flag operation. On May 4th, 2001, Zakheim was appointed Comptroller of
the Pentagon...”

Alan: That’s where they handle all the cash and
budgets.

“... where he proceeded to
‘lose’ at least 2.3 trillion dollars – a sum amounting to more than five times
the Pentagon’s annual budget. (CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer says the actual
sum is 9.1 trillion dollars.) On Monday, September 10th, 2001, Pentagon Chief
Donald Rumsfeld announced that 2.3 trillion dollars had gone missing from the
Pentagon.”

Alan: And the link for that is up on YouTube, as
well. You can actually see him talking about that, at the time.

“The oddest thing about this
announcement, besides the gargantuan sum, was its timing. It was the first and
last time that any significant political figure has ever chosen to announce
major bad news on a Monday.”

Alan: Which is true. They always do it on a Friday,
then you forget about it. And then they go on about Rumsfeld too, mentioning
about all the cash they lost etc etc. and what it’s doing now. But it’s the
same bunch, in other words they’re getting at, that’s running, behind Romney as
it was behind Bush Jr. That’s what they’re getting at.

The International Monetary Fund was to be
the big heavy boy. A heavy is someone who’s a debt collector. For the money
boys. That’s generally what they have. And it was set up, again, by the Royal
Institute for International Affairs. They’re the boys who came out with
the idea of a World Bank, which we have, of course. And they also
had a Bank for International Settlements, which would be the big
meeting place and coordinator for all the private central banks that would run
the world, which they have that too. And the International Monetary Fund would
be the big debt collector and heavy that would come into countries that were
defaulting because they were broke and the IMF would then run that country
behind the scenes until some of it was paid off. Even during Thatcher’s reign,
the IMF came in and actually dictated a lot of the British policy, at the time.
So, the IMF now (these unelected institutions) cut growth forecasts for the UK
economy.

“The International Monetary
Fund has slashed its growth forecast for the UK - predicting that the economy
will shrink by 0.4% this year.”

Alan: Now, with them doing this, of course, since
they’re already borrowing money like crazy, to lend to the Euro Central
Bank to throw away at Spain and Italy and elsewhere, they’re going to
be paying massive compound interest on this one. High interest rates. That’s
what it does when they downgrade you. The banks are running the whole show.
Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix.
And this article too,

“Leading World Bank
Demographer: Vaccination Campaigns Part Of Population Reduction Policy”

“American Undergraduates
Recruited For Population Control Agenda As UN Raises The Stakes”

Alan: It says.

“Neo-eugenicist John Seager
to undergraduates: ‘you’re the ones who are going to be able to move this
forward and complete what I see as one of the great social movements of our
time.’”

Alan: That’s convincing the public that they’ve got
to die, you know.

“In a recent biennial report
released last week by the United Nations Population Fund... ”

Alan: And the link’s on here too.

“(UNFPA) the projection for
global population growth in 2050 has been raised with an additional 117 million
people on top of the earlier projection of 8 billion people. As the UN keeps up
the pressure an effort is underway to flood universities and colleges
throughout the United States with population control propaganda. One of the
people doing the rounds across academic America is former EPA chief John
Seager... ”

Alan: You see, the Environmental Protection
Agency, environmental groups and so on, were all part of the same
agenda under camouflage. You understand that? It’s all eugenics. It’s all
eugenics, folks. Anyway, it says,

“... who now heads up an
organization called ‘Population Connection’, dedicated to the selling of human
population reduction. On October 3 2012, Pennsylvania State University provided
a stage for Seager, president of ‘Population Connection’, an organization
promoting the culling of the overall human population. Accepting an invitation
by the Institute of Environmental Studies, Seager attempted to convince a hall
filled with undergraduates of the need to bring down the population for
“sustainability” purposes. In an October 4 article titled ‘Lecturer Explores
Population Control Issues,’ the Daily Pennsylvanian reports Population
Connection aims to inform no less than three million k-12 students throughout
the United States “about this issue and to lobby Congress to garner support for
international family planning.’ ‘About 98 to 99 percent of all the population
growth is happening in generally very poor places that are very far away [from
America],’ Seager told the Daily Pennsylvanian. ‘And to bring this issue to
your average American is a very hard challenge.’”

Alan: What he means is, the average American, it’s
a hard challenge to get through to them.

“The man who extended the
invitation, Stanley Laskowski, explained why he attracted Seager to lecture:
‘population growth is the root of all environmental problems and his insight
into the issue at hand is invaluable.’ This is exactly the idea Seager is
promulgating across the US. As a former EPA chief appointed by the Clinton
administration in the mid 90s, Seager has found an eager audience in the
establishment academic scene. During one of his recent lectures, held at the
Nicholas School of the Environment, he stressed that man is the foremost enemy
to the planet... ”

Alan: That’s straight out of the agenda in the book
from the Club of Rome, where they said they were given the task
of finding a reason to unite the whole planet and they said that eventually
they dreamed up the idea that global warming, famine and plague and the like
would fit the bill. And it says,

“... and the global
population should be curbed towards what he calls ‘sustainable levels.’ Speaking
of the UN’s population projection for the next decades- which will have the
human population at 8 billion by 2050- Seager (from 35 minutes onward) stresses
that this ‘(…) if we move to that low line on the UN projection- in my view the
best possible outcome in terms of human population growth (through voluntary
programs)- it would be the biggest single slice of the carbon pie. It would do
more than thousand mile per gallon cars. It would do more than that.’ Seager
states that technological solutions to Co2 emissions will not be sufficient to
prevent global climatic Armageddon.”

Alan: They’re always on about this, you know, these
big prophets of gloom and doom, but they have to terrify the public. I’ve read
all the articles from these top guys before, where they say they have to always
scare the public with scary scenarios and vastly overestimate things to get us
to listen to them. Anyway,

“‘Tim Dyson at the London
School of Economics found that if we reduced our carbon footprint by one
percent a year in the developed world over the next forty years, a hundred
percent of that is wiped out by population growth.’”

Alan: It says. So, he

“... argues, the birthrate
in the developing countries should be drastically reduced. This is the global
consensus in the scientific community today. Whatever we do to diminish our
‘carbon footprint’ in the developed world, only a thorough culling of the Third
World population will make sure the earth has a chance of survival.”

Alan: And it goes on and on and on. So, don’t think
it’s just over there, folks; it’s happening to you at home, as well. The cancer
rates are skyrocketing and disabilities too are skyrocketing, with all the
injections and so on and the poisoned food that you’ve been made to eat. And
this article ties in with it.

“Hilary Clinton: Population
Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy. During remarks that she made for the 15th
Anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development...”

Alan: I’ll read that again.

“...International Conference
on Population and Development...”

Alan: They’ve had these for about a hundred years
folks. They’re not just sitting, making a wish-list; they implement them.

“... U.S. Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton announced the launch of a new program that according to Clinton
will now become the centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy. This new program
is known as the Global Health Initiative, and it is being incredibly
well-funded at a time when the U.S. government is drowning in debt. According
to Clinton, 63 billion dollars will be spent by the U.S. to prevent pregnancies
and to improve...”

Alan: What they call,

“...‘family planning’
services around the globe over the next six years.”

Alan: It’s abortions and so on.

“In other words, the new
centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy is all about eugenics and population
control. The following is an excerpt from Clinton’s remarks: In addition to new
funding, we’ve launched a new program that will be the centerpiece of our
foreign policy, the Global Health Initiative, which commits us to spending $63
billion over six years to improve global health by investing in efforts to
reduce maternal and child mortality... ”

Alan: How do you do it? By stopping them having
children, folks.

“prevent millions of
unintended pregnancies, and avert millions of new HIV infections, among other
goals.”

Alan: I wonder what the other goals are, as well.
Back with more on this after this break.

{Break ♫- You’re listening to the Republic
Broadcasting Network, because you can handle the truth!}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix.
And I’ll put up this article with all the rest of these articles tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com,
all the links up for you to look up yourself. It also has a whole bunch of
YouTube’s to watch, to do with depopulation as well and how this eugenic
movement has been on for a long, long time, what the real goals are and all the
rest of it. It’s quite something. It’s interesting too, that Hilary Clinton is
either going across the world convincing other countries to go in and slaughter
other people in the Middle East or she’s wanting to slaughter all the children
that could be born. So, it’s just, well, what can you say, folks? I mean that’s
fact, you know. That’s fact. You’d have to get in the mindset of these people;
if you did, you’d have to be awfully strong if you could possibly emerge
unscathed by the weird thoughts that go on in their heads. Also tonight, I’ll
put up a link to “The Man Who Saved Iceland,” basically, or he changed Iceland.
And he was the guy who got the big marches going and so on to chuck all the big
international crooks out of their country. I’ll put that up tonight, too. He’s
going around Europe right now, giving lectures on how to do the same thing. I hope
people take advantage of what he’s saying and try to use it because I’m so sick
of watching folk getting their heads bashed in with cops in different countries
now. It’s the new normal as the real face of the real owners of you, under all
the farce and guises of democracy or whatever they want to call it, as they
emerge. See, everything comes down to brute force. You’re really run by brute
force or the threat of it; that’s what law is about; intimidation through law
followed up by brute force. So, the threat of force and then brute force, as
the big boys show just how caring they really are and how evolved they’ve
become – your big leaders at the top, behind the scenes. Those who own you,
lock, stock and barrel. And always have, by the way. {Laughs}

“A veteran US
law-enforcement official has filed a blockbuster discrimination lawsuit against
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, charging she pushed him aside to
make way for a less-qualified woman who’s “enjoyed a long-standing
relationship” with the anti-terror chief. That woman, Dora Schriro, was later
appointed by Mayor Bloomberg as commissioner of the city Department of
Correction, a post she still holds. The court papers also allege that Suzanne
Barr, Napolitano’s chief of staff at Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has
engaged in “numerous” acts of “sexually offensive behavior” intended to
“humiliate and intimidate male employees.”

Alan: Well, once you put a bunch of these folks in,
that’s what they do, you know.

“Barr’s alleged acts include
calling one man ‘in his hotel room and screaming at him that she wanted...’”

Alan: To do something with his something in the
back of her throat. And that was in the mainstream; it’s been in the mainstream
too. And so it says,

“The suit was filed by James
T. Hayes Jr., special agent in charge of New York City investigations for
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Hayes, who began his career with the feds
as a border patrol agent in 1995, formerly served as director of ICE Detention
and Removal Operations in Washington, DC, where he oversaw about 8,500 workers
and a $2.5 billion budget.”

Alan: So he was no low-down guy; he was up there.

“But Hayes says he was
demoted following President Obama’s election and the appointment of Napolitano,
a former Arizona governor, to head the Department of Homeland Security.”

Alan: It says,

“In court papers filed in
Washington federal court, Hayes says Schriro — who previously served as
director of the Arizona Department of Corrections under Napolitano — was named
a “special adviser” to Napolitano on detention and removal operations in
February 2009 and began to replace him at DHS and ICE meetings. ‘Schriro was
not as qualified for the position plaintiff had because of lack of federal
law-enforcement experience,’ Hayes’ suit says. ‘Schriro did have experience,
however, working with Secretary Napolitano. Schriro enjoyed a long-standing
relationship with the secretary.’ The suit doesn’t detail the nature of their
relationship. During her 2002 gubernatorial campaign, Napolitano publicly
denied rumors that she’s a lesbian. In a 2009 interview, she said, ‘I just
happen not to be married.’ When asked at that time if she was ‘seeing anybody
now,’ she answered, ‘Yes, my staff.’ Hayes’ suit says that when it became clear
he was going to be removed from his post, he ‘felt that he was being targeted
because of his gender.’ He charges that in April and May 2009, ICE chief of
staff Barr “removed the entire contents...”

Alan: Listen to this:

“‘... the entire contents of
the offices of three male employees, including nameplates, computers and
telephones, to the men’s bathroom at ICE headquarters.’”

Alan: So they had to work in the bathroom in their
desks, and folk were still going in and out of the bathroom, right, doing their
stuff.

“‘Barr also created a
frat-house type atmosphere that is targeted to humiliate and intimidate male
employees,’ ...”

Alan: You understand, there are folk who hate and
these folk tend to truly... and they are haters, these folk. It’s not just
chips on their shoulders. It’s beyond that.

“In addition to the alleged
hotel phone call, Barr allegedly ‘covertly took an ICE BlackBerry device
assigned to a male special agent in charge and sent a BlackBerry Messenger
message to his female supervisor indicating that the male employee had a crush
on the female supervisor and fantasized about her.’ ‘Further, Barr promoted and
otherwise rewarded those male employees who play along with her sexually
charged games,’ the suit says.”

Alan: You understand, these people are obsessed
with sex, way beyond the average people. Obsessed with it. And they can’t keep
it out of the workplace. So, anyway, that’s going ahead with that one. And even
Geraldo came up with that:

“... raised questions about
a ‘lesbian cabal’ and ‘same-sex takeover’ at the Department of Homeland
Security, went further Monday, encouraging DHS and its head, Homeland Security
Secretary Janet Napolitano, to ‘tell people who they are.’”

Alan: And I’ll put these links up tonight, as well,
for those who want to know. And this article too is from the LGBT. It’s from
one of their articles here.

“Rights advocates are
welcoming news a surgical penis-construction procedure for transgender men will
be paid for by public medical insurance in B.C. [British Columbia]”

Alan: It’s a priority, obviously, isn’t it? And it
says,

“... for transgender men...”

Alan: Now, it’s really for women who want to have a
penis constructed because they want to pretend that they’re men, you see.
Because they’re really lesbians and it will help them in a lesbian endeavor, you
understand. Anyway,

“Phalloplasty will be
covered under the Medical Services Plan (MSP) for up to five people each year,
the provincial Ministry of Health has confirmed. After previously rejecting
calls to provide such coverage, the ministry decided to make the change
following a review this year of recent medical literature on the procedure.”

Alan: And it goes on and on and on about their
mental health and how it will really improve and all that kind of stuff.
Another article I’ll put up tonight too, is called,

“‘Too easy’: Ex-drone
operator on watching civilians die”

Alan: It says,

“James Jeffrey served as an
officer in the British Army in both Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2009, he helped
guide drones flying over Helmand Province, where he had to make life and death
decisions about whether to engage the enemy. Speaking to Orla Guerin, the BBC’s
correspondent in Pakistan, he describes how he almost ordered a drone attack on
a suspected militant thought to be planting an improvised explosive device. At the
last minute the strike was cancelled when he realised the potential enemy he
could see on the monitor was in fact a child playing. Mr Jeffrey also talked
about witnessing - via a video link from a fighter jet - a missile strike on
Taliban targets in built up areas that left several civilians dead. Having now
left the military and living in the US, Mr Jeffrey warns that while drones are
a precise and effective weapon they have also made it ‘too easy to kill.’”

Alan: “Too easy to kill” and isn’t that the truth.
Mind you, Mr. Jones was probably brought up too with video games and X-boxes
and all that, so they’re already primed for this kind of stuff, you understand.
They’re already primed for it.

And this article too says,

“Eleven dead, thousands in
danger amid spreading meningitis outbreak”

Alan: That’s caused by that corticosteroid, which
they’ve been injecting in folk, for inflammation of their spine, for arthritis
and so on.

“A deadly meningitis
outbreak that has left eleven dead, 119 infected and up to 13,000 at risk is
taking its toll across the US. With symptoms showing up weeks after exposure,
many more patients are expected to get sick. The meningitis-tainted steroid
shots were dispersed to health care centers across 23 US states and administered
to about 13,000 patients who requested treatment for back pain, according to
the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. But the shots have cost many
their life.”

Alan: Then it gives you an example of a guy and his
wife who went for the shots and his wife died.

“After responding to
medication, her spirits were lifted and she spent her time Skyping with her
grandsons in the hospital. But shortly thereafter, she suffered a stroke and
was removed from life support. ‘They advised me to watch for symptoms,’ ...”

Alan: He says.
And he:

“... is just one of
thousands watching the clock, waiting and hoping not to acquire any signs of
illness. The outbreak has been linked to the New England Compounding Center
(NECC), Inc., which is one of thousands of pharmacies that repackages or
recombines medications. The Food and Drug Administration has no power to
regulate compounded medications made at pharmacies like the one that dispersed
the meningitis-tainted steroid shots. Lawmakers claim the health crisis is
demonstrating the need for stronger FDA regulations...”

Alan: Well they’ll have to put them out of business
too, I suppose. It says,

“The NECC had shipped 17,676
vials of the steroid methylprednisolone acetate – which contained the
meningitis – to 76 healthcare facilities from July through September. Last
week, it recalled all the vials...”

Alan: That they’ve got left, I guess.

“...and voluntarily shut
down its services.”

Alan: So, they’ll be looking into it, but it just
shows you that we’re all trained to automatically just take medicines when it’s
prescribed and of course it doesn’t work out that way and it’s not like the movies.

In Canada, the ex-chief of the First Nations Indians
association:

“... will be ‘used as pawns’
as former chief to meet Iranian leaders”

Alan: So, there’s your spin off the bat from the
mainstream media. Because this ex-chief of the First Nations Indians, Canadian
Indians, is going to go over to see the Iranian leaders. So he’s going to be
used as a pawn and that’s the part you’re supposed to remember, you see. Right
off the bat. It’s very open, our media in Canada here, you see. And it says,

“A former First Nations
chief says he will meet with the Iranian regime in Tehran next week as part of
an ‘exploratory mission’ to discuss resource development and ‘human rights
abuses’ in Canada, sparking widespread condemnation and concerns about Iran’s
intentions.”

Alan: And what they do, they actually have, the
opposing person here is Nazanin Afshin-Jam, who is married to the Chief of
Defense for Canada. She’s from Iran. And she’s an activist to get all to
demolish the present system in Iran. Anyway, it says,

“What do you say to concerns
the regime will enlist First Nations to perpetrate violence against Canada?”

Alan: And Nelson says,

“That’s a pretty big
stretch. When have First Nations people ever bombed anything? The worst we’ve
ever done is make the white man late for lunch when we do our protests in the
city street. I’m 59 years old. If I was going to bomb something, I would have
bombed it a long time ago. Peter MacKay’s wife... ”

Alan: That’s the Iranian woman.

“... is constantly pushing
the Conservative agenda and talking about human rights violations.
[Iranian-Canadians] might not like the Iranian government, but does that mean
they support the deaths of millions of their people [because of the economic
sanctions]?”

Alan: And it is too, this sanctions stuff... it was
the same with the Iraqis. It would be the same as you. Just put yourself in the
same boat. If some other country was much bigger and larger and you were down a
little bit on the totem pole and they put sanctions on you, millions of you
would die. How could you get your government out of it? What could you do about
it? Nothing. So, starving the population is ridiculous. Anyway, I’ll put this
link up tonight and he talks about the fact that he’s pushing for... and it’s
true enough, have any of these guys that he’s talking about, has MacKay and his
wife, ever gone into any Indian Reserve and looked around there, in Canada, for
human’s rights and abuses and all the rest of it? You see everything is a farce
and hypocritical, isn’t it? Such hypocrites. As we pretend that we’ve got
democracy... what is democracy? What is democracy? Tell me what
democracy is. You can’t own your house; they’ll tax it from you. If you can’t
afford that, you’re out. You do what you’re told. You’re told not to speak
about certain topics—in a free society? Well, obviously, they shouldn’t call us
a “free society” if you can’t talk about certain things. Obviously.

I’ll also put this article up tonight too. It’s an article
from Slate Magazine and it says,

“How can we ban hate speech
against Jews while defending mockery of Muslims?”

Alan: It’s a good article. And it says,

“What have these laws
produced?”

Alan: It says,

“Look at the convictions
upheld or accepted by the European Court of Human Rights.”

Alan: And it says,

“Four Swedes who distributed
leaflets that called homosexuality ‘deviant’ and ‘morally destructive’ and
blamed it for AIDS. An Englishman who displayed in his window a 9/11 poster
proclaiming, ‘Islam out of Britain.’ A Turk who published two letters from
readers angry at the government’s treatment of Kurds. A Frenchman who wrote an
article disputing the plausibility of poison gas technology at a Nazi
concentration camp. Look at the defendants rescued by the court. A Dane
‘convicted of aiding and abetting the dissemination of racist remarks’ for
making a documentary in which three people ‘made abusive and derogatory remarks
about immigrants and ethnic groups.’ A man ‘convicted of openly inciting the
population to hatred’ in Turkey by ‘criticizing secular and democratic
principles and openly calling for the introduction of Sharia law.’”

Alan: He goes through a whole list of them that end
up in court, you see. And then they go into the case of a

“Frenchman who sought
free-speech protection under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human
Rights:...”

Alan: And it says,

“Denis Leroy is a
cartoonist. One of his drawings representing the attack on the World Trade
Centre was published in a Basque weekly newspaper … with a caption which read:
‘We have all dreamt of it ... Hamas did it.’ Having been sentenced to payment
of a fine for ‘condoning terrorism,’ Mr Leroy argued that his freedom of
expression had been infringed. The Court considered that, through his work, the
applicant had glorified the violent destruction of American imperialism,
expressed moral support for the perpetrators of the attacks of 11 September,
commented approvingly on the violence perpetrated against thousands of
civilians and diminished the dignity of the victims.”

Alan: And it says,

“How can you justify
prosecuting cases like these while defending cartoonists and video makers who
ridicule Mohammed?”

Alan: That’s true. How can we sit here in other
countries and watch all this vilification of Mohammed? And we do. We’re all getting
conditioned to do it. You’re always taught to hate an enemy, you understand.
You must demonize an enemy. Look at all... you can go up on the websites and
look at all the cartoons they brought out for World War II and all the posters,
the propaganda posters. You’ll see Japanese with buck teeth and big glasses and
that’s how they portrayed them all. And Germans: they were just like robots in
big helmets and really just like clones of each other. Demonize the enemy. I’ll
put up tonight too, that one I’ve put up many times before to do with “real bad
Arabs” and how Hollywood has been training you to hate Arabs for over forty
years. But then it says,

“The principle born out of
the wretched record of hate speech prosecutions is worth defending but first we
have to live up to it.”

Alan: It says. And it gives a whole bunch of good
information on it and shows you how much... you cannot be hypocritical. Either
there’s no hate-speech laws or everybody goes under hate-speech laws. That’s
it. That’s fairness. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix.
And this article too, is to do with Iran, as well. It says,

“In the Washington Post
today, Richard Cohen expresses surprise that Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad is "starting to make some sense" and "wax
rationally". Cohen specifically cites this statement from the Iranian
president last week:”

Alan: When he said,

“‘Let’s even imagine that we
have an atomic weapon, a nuclear weapon. What would we do with it? What intelligent
person would fight 5,000 American bombs with one bomb?’ Cohen’s surprise
notwithstanding, numerous Iranian leaders, including Ahmadinejad, have long
made the same point. And it’s a point so obvious it should not even need to be
made. No rational person takes seriously the claim that Iran, even if it did
obtain a nuclear weapon, would commit instant and guaranteed national suicide
by using it to attack a nation that has a huge nuclear stockpile, which happens
to include both the US and Israel. One can locate nothing in the actions of
Iran’s regime that even suggests irrationality on that level, let alone
suicidal impulses. That Iran will use its nuclear weapons against the US and
Israel is rather obviously the centerpiece of the fear-mongering campaign
against Tehran, to build popular support for threats to launch an aggressive
attack in order to prevent them from acquiring that weapon. So what, then, is
the real reason that so many people in both the US and Israeli governments are
so desperate to stop Iranian proliferation? Every now and then, they reveal the
real reason: Iranian nuclear weapons would prevent the US from attacking Iran
at will, and that is what is intolerable.”

Alan: I’ll say that again:

“Iranian nuclear weapons
would prevent the US from attacking Iran at will, and that is what is
intolerable. The latest person to unwittingly reveal the real reason for
viewing an Iranian nuclear capacity as unacceptable was GOP Senator Lindsey
Graham, one of the US’s most reliable and bloodthirsty warmongers. On Monday,
Graham spoke in North Augusta, South Carolina, and was asked about the way in
which sanctions were harming ordinary Iranians. Ayman Hossam Fadel was present
and recorded the exchange. Answering that question, Graham praised President Obama
for threatening Iran with war over nuclear weapons, decreed that ‘the Iranian
people should be willing to suffer now for a better future,’ and then –
invoking the trite neocon script that is hauled out whenever new wars are being
justified – analogized Iranian nukes to Hitler in the 1930s.”

Alan: {Laughs} We’re way beyond Hitler, folks.

“But in the middle of his
answer, he explained the real reason Iranian nuclear weapons should be feared:
They have two goals: one, regime survival. The best way for the regime
surviving, in their mind, is having a nuclear weapon, because when you have a
nuclear weapon, nobody attacks you.’ Graham added that the second regime goal
is ‘influence’, that ‘people listen to you’ when you have a nuclear weapon. In
other words, we cannot let Iran acquire nuclear weapons because if they get
them, we can no longer attack them when we want to and can no longer bully them
in their own region. Graham’s answer is consistent with what various American
policy elites have said over the years about America’s enemies generally and
Iran specifically: the true threat of nuclear proliferation is that it can
deter...”

“... American aggression.
Thomas Donnelly of the American Enterprise Institute and the New American
Century Project has long been crystal clear that this is the real reason for
opposing Iranian nuclear capability...”

Alan: And this is what he said, this Thomas
Donnelly:

“‘When their missiles are
tipped with warheads carrying nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, even
weak regional powers have a credible deterrent regardless of the balance of
conventional forces … In the post cold war era, America and its allies, rather
than the Soviet Union, have become the primary objects of deterrence and it is
states like Iraq, Iran and North Korea who most wish to develop deterrent
capabilities.’”

Alan: And he added:

“‘The surest deterrent to
American action is a functioning nuclear arsenal...’”

Alan: So, that’s what it really is about. It’s also
about that too and plunder and standardizing them all (all the countries across
there) into the same private central banking system, under the Bank of
International Settlements and getting them all in debt. That’s so as
that the rich guys of the world can plunder it, like they’ve done with the
rest. That’s what it’s about.

From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s
goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.