We know that the current through an inductor \(L\) cannot be turned on or off instantaneously. The change in current changes flux, inducing an emf opposing the change (Lenz’s law). How long does the opposition last? Current will flow and can be turned off, but how long does it take? Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\) shows a switching circuit that can be used to examine current through an inductor as a function of time.

Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): (a) An RL circuit with a switch to turn current on and off. When in position 1, the battery, resistor, and inductor are in series and a current is established. In position 2, the battery is removed and the current eventually stops because of energy loss in the resistor. (b) A graph of current growth versus time when the switch is moved to position 1. (c) A graph of current decay when the switch is moved to position 2.

When the switch is first moved to position 1 (at \(t = 0\)), the current is zero and it eventually rises to \(I_0 = V/R\). where \(R\) is the total resistance of the circuit. The opposition of the inductor \(L\) is greatest at the beginning, because the amount of change is greatest. The opposition it poses is in the form of an induced emf, which decreases to zero as the current approaches its final value. The opposing emf is proportional to the amount of change left. This is the hallmark of an exponential behavior, and it can be shown with calculus that

\[I = I_0(1 - e^{-t./\tau}) \, (turning \, on),\]

is the current in an RL circuit when switched on (Note the similarity to the exponential behavior of the voltage on a charging capacitor). The initial current is zero and approaches \(I_0 = V/R\) with a characteristic time constant \(\tau\) for an RL circuit, given by

\[\tau = \dfrac{L}{R},\]

where \(\tau\) has units of seconds, since \(1 \, H = 1 \, \Omega \cdot s\). In the first period of time \(\tau\), the current rises from zero to \(0.632 \, I_0\), since

\[I = I_0(1 - e^{-1}) = I_0 (1 - 0.368) = 0.632 \, I_0.\]

The current will go 0.632 of the remainder in the next time \(\tau\). A well-known property of the exponential is that the final value is never exactly reached, but 0.632 of the remainder to that value is achieved in every characteristic time \(\tau\). In just a few multiples of the time \(\tau\), the final value is very nearly achieved, as the graph in Figure \(\PageIndex{1b}\) illustrates.

The characteristic time \(\tau\) depends on only two factors, the inductance \(L\) and the resistance \(R\). The greater the inductance \(L\), the greater \(\tau\) is, which makes sense since a large inductance is very effective in opposing change. The smaller the resistance \(R\), the greater \(\tau\) is. Again this makes sense, since a small resistance means a large final current and a greater change to get there. In both cases—large \(L\) and small \(R\) —more energy is stored in the inductor and more time is required to get it in and out.

When the switch in Figure \(\PageIndex{1a}\) is moved to position 2 and cuts the battery out of the circuit, the current drops because of energy dissipation by the resistor. But this is also not instantaneous, since the inductor opposes the decrease in current by inducing an emf in the same direction as the battery that drove the current. Furthermore, there is a certain amount of energy, \((1/2)LI_0^2\), stored in the inductor, and it is dissipated at a finite rate. As the current approaches zero, the rate of decrease slows, since the energy dissipation rate is \(I^2R\). Once again the behavior is exponential, and \(I\) is found to be

\[I = I_0e^{-t/\tau} \, (turning \, off).\]

(Figure \(\PageIndex{1c}\)) In the first period of time \(\tau = L/R\) after the switch is closed, the current falls to 0.368 of its initial value, since \(I = I_0e^{-1} = 0.368 \, I_0\). In each successive time \(\tau\) the current falls to 0.368 of the preceding value, and in a few multiples of \(\tau\), the current becomes very close to zero, as seen in the graph in Figure \(\PageIndex{1c}\).

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): Calculating Characteristic Time and Current in an RL Circuit

What is the characteristic time constant for a 7.50 mH inductor in series with a \(3.00 \, \Omega\) resistor?

Find the current 5.00 ms after the switch is moved to position 2 to disconnect the battery, if it is initially 10.0 A.

Strategy for (a)

The time constant for an RL circuit is defined by \(\tau = L/R\).

Solution for (a)

Entering known values into the expression for \(\tau\) given in \(\tau = L/R\) yields

After another 5.00 ms has passed, the current will be 0.183 A (see Exercise); so, although it does die out, the current certainly does not go to zero instantaneously.

In summary, when the voltage applied to an inductor is changed, the current also changes, but the change in current lags the change in voltage in an RL circuit. In Reactance, Inductive and Capacitive, we explore how an RL circuit behaves when a sinusoidal AC voltage is applied.

Summary

When a series connection of a resistor and an inductor—an RL circuit—is connected to a voltage source, the time variation of the current is \[I - I_0(1 - e^{-t/\tau}) \, (turning \, on),\] where\(I_0 = V/R\) is the final current.

The characteristic time constant \(\tau\) is \(tau = \frac{L}{R}\), where \(L\) is the inductance and \(R\) is the resistance.

In the first time constant \(\tau\) the current rises from zero to \(0.632 \, I_0\), and 0.632 of the remainder in every subsequent time interval \(\tau\).

When the inductor is shorted through a resistor, current decreases as \[I = I_0 e^{-t/\tau} \, turning \, off).\] Here \(I_0\) is the initial current.

Current falls to \(0.368 \, I_0\) in the first time interval \(\tau\), and 0.368 of the remainder toward zero in each subsequent time \(\tau\).

Glossary

characteristic time constant

denoted by \(\tau\), of a particular series RL circuit is calculated by \(\tau = \frac{L}{R}\), where \(L\) is the inductance and \(R\) is the resistance

Contributors

Paul Peter Urone (Professor Emeritus at California State University, Sacramento) and Roger Hinrichs (State University of New York, College at Oswego) with Contributing Authors: Kim Dirks (University of Auckland) and Manjula Sharma (University of Sydney). This work is licensed by OpenStax University Physics under a Creative Commons Attribution License (by 4.0).

Recommended articles

The LibreTexts libraries are Powered by MindTouch®and are supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739 and the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions, and Merlot. Unless otherwise noted, LibreTexts content is licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Have questions or comments? For more information contact us at info@libretexts.org.