U.S. airline pilots will be exempted from physical checks at airport security checkpoints

U.S. airline pilots will be exempted from physical checks at airport security checkpoints so federal screeners can better focus on passengers, the
Transportation Security Administration chief said.

Pilots starting next year will be able to move through checkpoints with proof of identity, said John Pistole, who leads the agency, in an interview
today at Bloomberg’s office in Washington. He said he is in talks with flight attendants about similar exemptions.

“This one seemed to jump out as a common-sense issue,” Pistole said. “Why don’t we trust pilots who are literally in charge of the
aircraft?”

So next year, U.S Airline Pilots will no longer be subjected to the scanners. A win for the Pilots. I just don't want to hear any new's article
claiming a terrorist, somehow managed to attain a job as a airline pilot to cause harm. Would not be good at all.

wow they are really stretching on this one. do you know how much money there is in drug trafficking? hmmm. a sane pilot may have no incentive to
take his own plane down, but that same sane pilot may end up with great incentive to commit easy, victimless crimes for lots of $$$. if i remember
correctly, they don't get paid very well. what happened is pilots no longer have incentive to help us get rid of these disgusting scanners and
sexually invasive pat-downs.

we just lost our reinforcements in this particular battle for personal freedom.

Airline pilots routinely make an average of 80k on up, with senior pilots making a nice chunk of change. Keep in mind FAA regulations also restrict
the number of hours pilots / copilots can fly before being "grounded" to reset their time frame.

Number of hours they fly each month:
Commercial Airline Pilots can not fly any more than 100 hours in a month, no more than 30 hours of flying during a 7 day period, and no more than 8
hours of flight time in a day.

As someone else pointed out, making Pilots go through a security glow and grope is pointless, as the pilot can just crash the plane (as what possibly
occured with Egypt Air Flight 990 that crashed over the Atlanitc Ocean).

As far as the argument goes about it being a 4th amendment violation. People have the choice not to fly, as their is no real expectation of Privacy in
Public. A patdown / Frisk, the same type the TSA is using, is not considered a search under Supreme Court Rulings. In actuality the manner in which
the patdowns / frisks are being conducted (with a few exceptions) is the same technique Law Enforcement around the world uses. Also, to the best of my
knowledge TSA screeners are not comissioned Law Enforcement for the state they work in, nor the Federal Agency they work for, which means their are
differing standards as to what they are allowed to do since they are not operating under color of law (42 USC 1983 for those intrested).

The best comparison I can come up with is your drivers license. While travel is a contitutionally protected right, the manner in which you travel is
not (think shoe leather express).

Now with that being said, how do we fix the problem, which is screening passengers in such a manner that protects the people flying, while at the same
time protecting the rights of people who chose to fly?

The slippery slope we are on now (personally I think we stepped off a while back and are slowly gaining speed on our way down) does nothing but
guarantee a win for terrorism, since they accomplished their goal of moving a free society into a police state. While we are not under Sharia law, we
are quickly moving towards that style of arbitrary decisions by a few under the guise of protecting the people.

I would be pissed if I got on an airplane and it blew up. I would be pissed to have to undergo the glow and grope as well.

Whats the middle ground solution? Placing armed uniformed officers on every flight? All this does is give any terrorist who made it on board their
first target before their next move.

thanks for the info on pilot salaries, very enlightening! in answer to your other points, i think it is the fact that these "pat-downs" are not
considered searches is what we are all so upset about. you compared it to a drivers license, but i believe that is inaccurate in that i do not have
to submit to what basically amounts to a strip search in order to get a drivers license or a car for that matter. or a gun, knife, potentially
explosive material etc. etc. etc.

Actually what I was refering to with regards to the License is the fact that driving a vehicle is a privelage and not a right. All the Constitution
guarantess is freedom of movement within a state, as well as from state t state. If you want to drive instead of walk, you have to get a driver's
license. The license carries with it something called implied consent.

It means if you are lawfully stopped for DWI, you must submit to a breathalyzer / datamaser. You can refuse, but your license is revoked on the
spot.

Flying is going to be the same way. Its also a privelage and in order to fly, they want people to submit a screening in order to board the plane. You
can refuse, which means shoe leather express becomes an aoption, but not a very pleasent one.

Don't get me wrong, I think the TSA is going overboard, but whats the fix to the problem? Failure to screen has had catastrophic results in the past.
The metal detectors worked for a little while, until criminals caught up with the technology, using plastics that are not detected by metal
detector.

How do you keep people safe while at the same time not violating the person.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.