Wednesday, February 27, 2013

After listening to a bunch of podcasts and 'interviews' I have decided who I would vote for. Either Matias Otero or Zander. Neither has announced running for the CSM. I am not even sure that Matias knows what the CSM is, but listening to them they clearly would make better CSM members than any of the announced candidates.

Matias Otero
Within one month of starting to play EVE created he has grown his new corp to over a thousand members strong. Listening to him on the Declarations of War podcast, he obviously has way more recent experience as a new player who is very involved in the game then any of the veterans that have announced. Stupid game mechanics that we have long forgotten about (like the idiocy of game mechanics basically encouraging war-decking new player corps) are stupid to him. He is articulate and clearly willing to do what it takes to learn the game. I feel he would actually bring something to the CSM that CCP could actually use.

Zander
Host of the Crossing Zebras podcast, he has interviewed most of the announced candidates. His interviews are first rate. Although he claims to be off working on an oil rig, I would suggest CNN hire him. Amazingly good interviews. He clearly does the research ahead of time and asks tough questions that really gets at what each interviewee is all about. Amazingly he doesn't get mired in pointless arguments. After listening to most of the interviews, he his clearly more aware of the issues, and able to discuss them reasonably, then any of the candidates that he interviewed. Fantastic job, a huge amount of work, and I think he needs to be on the CSM.

Really, I hope either or both of these candidates make a run. And I hope most of the other bitter-vet / more toys for null-sec candidates drop out. In the end, with the new voting mechanics, I think we are going to see a CSM dominated by Goons and TEST with maybe one or two relatively independent bitter-vets. The CSM will spend most of it's time dealing with the most important issue facing them... 'Who gets to go to Iceland!'. Hopefully the rest of the community can come together and not split their vote so much that the major blocs dominate CSM 8.

Monday, February 4, 2013

Granger of Agony Unleashed had an excellent post on our internal forums last week regarding base ship resistances by race/class. This is one of those topics that I knew some of the details for, but never really dug in to fully understand the various impacts in detail. With permission I include below the complete post:

Well actually, resistance is anything but futile.

Simply described - resists reduce the amount of damage your ship actually takes compared to what is delivered. Example:

A Drake shoots a Kinetic missile at you for 100 damage. You have shield resist of 75% to Kinetic, so you only take 25 damage.

The knock-on effect is that increased resists also makes self-reps
(Armor Repairers, or Shield Boosters) more effective, as well as remote
reps from logistics, due to the reduction in received damage. Thus,
increased resists not only increases your base EHP but also results in
more effective repairing, unlike adding hitpoints through
plates/trimarks or extenders/field extenders (unless of course you don't
have enough buffer to allow the reps to land, but that is another
topic).

One thing that seems to be frequently misinterpreted is how the various
ship classes compare in terms of resists. Well, they all follow the same
pattern. I am going to concentrate on armor here to try and keep it
simple, but will list shield base stats too. All profiles are listed
EM-The-Kin-Exp just like in EFT

BASE
Shield 0-20-40-50
Armor 50-35-25-10

Now - the way armor works through the classes is that all hulls have
some level of improved defence against the primary damage type of their
natural enemy. So, the natural enemy of the Caldari are the Gallente.
Gallente primary damage type is Thermal (think drones). So, all Caldari
ships have some extent of improved resist against Thermal. Likewise
vice-versa, and of course for Minmatar-Amarr. Each race also has a
secondary damage type. The primary and secondary damage types are listed
below.

That's the easy part out of the way, as for the T2 ship hulls, both
shield and armor get a buff, in both primary and secondary damage types.
It depends on ship class, though thankfully makes sense in that light
fast ships (Inty, Dictor, EAF) get slightly less bonus compared to those
we usually associate with massive tank (HIC, Command Ship). As there
are so many combinations, I am going to concentrate on Amarr Armor only
from now on.

Interceptor / Covert Ops / Interdictor
These receive the smallest of all the T2 ship class buffs, an additional 10% in primary damage type only over the T1 hulls:
Amarr 50-35-25-30 (NB EFT will tell you different for the Malediction,
but that is because it gets 5% resist bonus per level of Amarr Frigate
skill)

Black Ops
Oddly, receives a smaller bonus to primary damage type than an Inty, but also a small bonus to secondary:
Amarr 50-35-28.75-28

Stealth Bomber / Marauder
Receive a bigger bonus to primary damage type and also a small bonus to secondary:
Amarr 50-35-34.4-40

Electronic Attack Frigate / Force Recon
As above, but now a bigger bonus to primary damage type and also a small bonus to secondary:
Amarr 50-35-43.8-60

Combat Recon / Field Command Ship
Amarr 50-35-53.1-70
(Similar to Malediction, EFT will tell you the Absolution does better, but again it's due to the 5% resist bonus per level)

AF / HAC / HIC / Logistics Cruiser / Tech 3 / Fleet Command
Amarr 50-35-62.5-80
(Again EFT will tell you the Damnation/Devoter does better due to the 5%
resist bonus per level. You can also fit the resist Sub to the T3)

As I say the same traits are applied to shield as well as Armor, making
it easier to make balanced Armor tankers from Amarr T2, whereas Minnie
T2 make balanced shield tankers. Caldari/Gallente are a bit oddball in
that given they are strong to The/Kin and Kin/The respectively, it means
they have a huge hole left. However, once plugged, it does mean they
can fit very strong tanks with good resist across the board, simply by
fitting an EM Screen on a shield fit or an Explosive Hardener on an
armor fit.

Followers

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. CCP hf. has granted permission to Scram Web - An Eve Online Blog to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, Scram Web - An Eve Online Blog. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.