To comply with European Union law, we are required to inform users accessing "overunity.com" from within the
EU about the cookies that this site uses and the information they contain and also provide them with the means
to "opt-in" - in other words, permit the site to set cookies.
Cookies are small files that are stored by your browser and all browsers have an option whereby you can inspect
the content of these files and delete them if you wish.

The following table details the name of each cookie, where it comes from and what we know about the information
that cookie stores:

Cookie

Origin

Persistency

Information and Usage

ecl_auth

overunity.com

Expires after 30 days

This cookie contains the text "EU Cookie Law - LiPF cookies authorised".
Without this cookie, the Forums' software is prevented from setting other cookies.

SMFCookie648

overunity.com

Expires according to user-chosen session duration

If you log-in as a member of this site, this cookie contains your user name, an encrypted hash of
your password and the time you logged-in. It is used by the site software to ensure that features such as indicating
new Forum and Private messages are indicated to you. This cookie is essential for the site software to work correctly.

PHPSESSID

overunity.com

Current session only

This cookie contains a unique Session Identification value. It is set for both members and
non-members (guests) and it is essential for the site software to work correctly. This cookie is not persistent
and should be automatically removed when you close the browser window.

pmx_upshr{NAME}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records your display preferences for the site's Portal page if a panel
or individual block is collapsed or expanded

pmx_pgidx_blk{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the page number for the site's Portal page if the page for a
individual block is changed.

pmx_cbtstat{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the expand/collapse state for a CBT Navigator block content.

pmx_poll{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the id for the current poll in a multiple Poll block.

pmx_{fadername}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the state for a Opac-Fader block.

pmx_LSBsub{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the current category and the state for a static Category block.

pmx_shout{ID}

overunity.com

Current session only

These cookies are set to records the current state of a Shout box block.

pmx_php_ckeck

overunity.com

Page load time

This cookie will probably never see you. It is set, if a Syntax check on a PHP block is initiated
and will be deleted if the function executed.

pmx_YOfs

overunity.com

Page load time

This cookie will probably never see you. It is set on portal actions like click on a page number.
The cookie is evaluated on load the desired page and then deleted. It is used to restore the vertical screen position
as before the click.

Notes:

1

We are aware that Google uses additional cookies it stores on your PC and when you browse our site and all other
sites. These are used to target advertising and Google currently does this without seeking your permission. Four of
these cookies we know about are named "rememberme", "NID", "PREF" and "PP_TOS_ACK"
and are stored in Google's cache on your computer.

2

If you are accessing this site using someone else's computer, please ask the owner's permission before
accepting cookies.

3

Your browser provides you with the ability to inspect all cookies stored on your PC. In addition your browser
is responsible for removing "current session only" cookies and those that have expired; if your browser is
not doing this, you should report the matter to your browser's authors.

4

We regret and apologies for any inconvenience this causes to members and guests who are accessing our web site
from outside the European Union. It is not currently possible for us to interrogate your browser and obtain geographic
location information in order to decide whether or not to prompt you to accept cookies.

For further and fuller information about cookies and their use, please visit
All About Cookies

I realized an interview of the retired physicist Richard VIALLE (french), presenting his negative mass theory, a new model of gravity and of the mass and its applications to antigravity and overunity production of electric power.

Richard VIALLE has elaborated his theory in the beginning of the 80's but as an exceptional fact he also has realized many experiments showing the validity of the theory. He got gravitational anomalies and has created an overunity generator (free energy) running successfully according to his theory. These devices have been replicated and tested independently successfully.

Richard VIALLE first presents us his theory, its basis and foundations and the computations explaining it in a large part of the interview (many videos), then he explains the way the devices he invented work, their schematic and the way to reproduce them. Movies showing these devices working are included, concerning gravity anomalies (negative mass) and overunity.

This interview is the testimony given by Richard VIALLE to mandkind, the sum of almost 30 years of work which has been so slightly spread up to now. He doesn't want to make money with it or being glorified; but he only wants to spread these ideas so they could be used freely by everybody willing to reproduce the devices and use it for a progress. He is a man with a great ideal.

I spread the work of Richard VIALLE in a french forum attached to the website I created since march 2011. One of the subjects (all in FRENCH) dedicated to him and where you will be able to contact Richard VIALLE if you wish so (he is a member of these forums and wishes to use this way only to be in contact):

Interview - Richard VIALLE: Introduction & Part 1 (video 1/7)Video is in french but an english subtitle has been made - please activate subtitle button in youtube window buttons (second button starting from left within the button bar at the bottom of the youtube video window)

Introduction:why this interview was done and who is interviewed (what did he realize?)

Part 1:Mass and Newton's equation of gravitationFour-dimension-volume: non compressible 4 dimension volume: basis of the theoryRadius R0 of gravity expansionFlow of the 4th space dimension dependind on time

Interview - Richard VIALLE: Part 2 & Part 3 (video 2/7)Video is in french but an english subtitle has been made - please activate subtitle button in youtube window buttons (second button starting from left within the button bar at the bottom of the youtube video window)

Part 2:Computation of the time flowing for gravitation in our 3 dimensions from the 4th oneUse of restricted relativity: modified equation of the flowGravitational mass moving: existence of negative massAlteration of negative mass with acceleration

Interview - Richard VIALLE: Part 4 & Part 5 (video 3/7)Video is in french but an english subtitle has been made - please activate subtitle button in youtube window buttons (second button starting from left within the button bar at the bottom of the youtube video window)

Part4:Independant replication of the last version of Richard VIALLE's scale by Jean-Paul C.: pictures, movies, scheme, explaination of observed anomalies: experimental set-up

Part 5:Description of the firts observed effects of the pigtaill system (QDC) by Alain B. and changement in electric resistors and of time flow speedMovies of the runnng device showing abnormal resistor modifications.Alain B.'s testimony of the time flow modification measured with mchanic and electronic chronometer.

As translations have been made to allow international workers to focus on it; we will save time if not translating other videos (many hours doing so, for english readers; interview was in french, and we will continue working on it only with french men, easier for us).

I will take a look about your video, BTW Hector Perez (Rotoverter Inventor) have reported links between Overunity, Gravity manipulation and Time manipulation: Time and Space travel (and some other weird effects)...

As translations have been made to allow international workers to focus on it; we will save time if not translating other videos (many hours doing so, for english readers; interview was in french, and we will continue working on it only with french men, easier for us.

Thanks for your non interest.

@Pascuser:

Did Richard VIALLE ever demonstrate a working over unit machine with a COP > 1? (COP > 100 000 would of course be even better.)

Did any one ever build a working OU machine based on Richard VIALLE's theories?

Is it your wish, that people read Richard VIALLE's theories and then try to build a working contraption?

Did you build a machine based on Richard VIALLE's theories?

Do you plan to build a machine based on Richard VIALLE's theories?

I would be interested in information about a truly working OU machine based on Richard VIALLE's theories. (I can read and understand French.)

Well, a balance moved. So what? Where is the free energy taken out of this experiment? How could one take out energy from this balance? Has any one demonstrated that energy taken out from this balance could do some work (e.g. drive a dynamo)?

I do not doubt that VIALLE's balance is interesting, but what can one do with it concerning energy creation? As far as I understand, one needs electricity to turn the disc with an electric motor. The small and slow movement of the balance arm (which stops after a short time, although the disk keeps spinning) can never generate enough energy to recover the electricity put into the electric motor driving the disc.

There might be a gravity abnormality, but one paid by feeding electricity into the electric motor driving the disk. Where is the OU?

Vialle seems to talk about a gravity abnormality (which needs energy to be caused), but where is the enormous energy to be gained? Electricity is fed into the balance (rotation of the disk) and a very slow and short term movement of the balance arm follows. Interesting effect, but where is the OU?

As you will hear and see in the interview serie (translation not finished for the full serie; only 3 firts videos up to now) Richard VIALLE has built his overunity device, I have visited him and seen it.

Then I have replicated it during 8 months; starting from the basic concept to his lat one. I have measured minimal COP of 300 with not a great precision. COP>100 000 has been measured with a physic measurement institue in Swiss and COP>10 000 has been measured with an individual with HF wattmeter.

In the interview all is given to understand anr replicate the overunity generator; as I have been able to, so no reaction to this post seemed pretty a shame.

This is not theory only, Richard VIALLE has designed a theory and has realized devices according to this theory and I have worked with him concerning 2 of the 3 main devices, to replicate, test with him and measure independantly.

All is in the interview; and an electronic file will me made for each device kind. I have yet completed the file for the first device, showing negative mass and antigravity effects (in french). I will begin to write the file about generator next; but again all is said and showed in the interview.

As documents are done, if there is interest, I will try to translate, but it takes as long as making the document in my native language, so with no interest, I will not invest hours in translating. For the moment I have not time for this; I write the documens in french first.

Replication of the overunity generator he designed by everybody is his aim; he doesn't hide anything because instead of useual inventors tryong to gain money and hiding a major secret to have the central place to geat rich, Richard VIALLE doesn't seek to have money.

A version of his generator produces about 10 Watts of electricity while recharging the batteries powering it. I only worked with version with inpout/output measurement, not a looped one like the one with batteries, because electronic with low power to achieve it muste be designed. I use lab material to power; so no loop. But you can build the loop version if you can design electronic device to power it with low loss; so you have a better proof than an input/output measurement.

Well, a balance moved. So what? Where is the free energy taken out of this experiment? How could one take out energy from this balance? Has any one demonstrated that energy taken out from this balance could do some work (e.g. drive a dynamo)?

I do not doubt that VIALLE's balance is interesting, but what can one do with it concerning energy creation?

It shows all anomalies about this system.The same theory of negative mass effect lead to building an overunity generator, using negative mass with resonant frequencies. The whole is ONE theory and I speak here of the overunity generator and not of the sacale.

As a physicist I am not only focused on the overunity generator; for me it is as important as antigravity effects; but as here this website is named "overunity" I write here about overunity and not the scale. For the scale, you have informations in the interview and the electronic file I finished recently in the previous link.

As I wrote here, I will write the following file about the generator, the same kind than for the scale.

On the contrary of what you could think, Richard VIALLE doesn't need somebody to design a device he invented and work only in his head.

His devices work since years in the real world, and he did it, not only invented an idea which could work or not.

Is his theory completely correct or not I can't say, but his devices show gravity anomalies and overunity, time modification too. And wether it is his theory that describes it or not is not very important, here I come to give you the way to replicate the devices and state yourself according to your interest: gravity anomalies and/or overunity electricity generation.

But as he designed it according to his theory and it worked, we could say that the theory has a not so bad heart of truth.

When you will have the same overunity statement than him and me (I did it in 2009) you will be able to see if you can do better. Because he extracted 10 watts only, but with a possibility to have 3000 Watts according to his theory, and with an accidental adjustment he once had 10 centimeters sparks bruning the while electronic: more power is so possible as he forecasted.

On the contrary of what you could think, Richard VIALLE doesn't need somebody to design a device he invented and work only in his head.

His devices work since years in the real world, and he did it, not only invented an idea which could work or not.

Is his theory completely correct or not I can't say, but his devices show gravity anomalies and overunity, time modification too. And wether it is his theory that describes it or not is not very important, here I come to give you the way to replicate the devices and state yourself according to your interest: gravity anomalies and/or overunity electricity generation.

But as he designed it according to his theory and it worked, we could say that the theory has a not so bad heart of truth.

When you will have the same overunity statement than him and me (I did it in 2009) you will be able to see if you can do better. Because he extracted 10 watts only, but with a possibility to have 3000 Watts according to his theory, and with an accidental adjustment he once had 10 centimeters sparks bruning the while electronic: more power is so possible as he forecasted.

Thank you for your very good responses.

In my opinion it would be very useful to concentrate on just one working device which produces more energy than is put in. This device should be carefuly documented. Especially the measurements which seem to show OU.

All OU machines which I have heard about so far exhibit the same flaw:

One could extract free energy, but some little problems persist.

It is always difficult to show OU with small outputs.

I admit that the effect is mind boggling and it should be examined carefully. But it is not very helpful to talk about huge energy gains befor they can be demonstrated clearly.

I will try to read all the information you provided (fortunately I can read French) and I will look at all the nice videos.

Again, please direct me to just one device that clearly shows OU. But I am not so very much intersted in the OU effect, lifting something by help of electricity (spinning a disk) is good enough.

Sorry, I got side tracked by the OU talk (OU never has been proven consistantly by any one). Richard VIALLE has discovered something very interesting. The OU angle and the OU claim will scare many people and is not helpful at all.

Then I have replicated it during 8 months; starting from the basic concept to his lat one. I have measured minimal COP of 300 with not a great precision. COP>100 000 has been measured with a physic measurement institue in Swiss and COP>10 000 has been measured with an individual with HF wattmeter.

This is not theory only, Richard VIALLE has designed a theory and has realized devices according to this theory and I have worked with him concerning 2 of the 3 main devices, to replicate, test with him and measure independently.

A version of his generator produces about 10 Watts of electricity while recharging the batteries powering it. I only worked with version with inpout/output measurement, not a looped one like the one with batteries, because electronic with low power to achieve it muste be designed. I use lab material to power; so no loop. But you can build the loop version if you can design electronic device to power it with low loss; so you have a better proof than an input/output measurement.

The claim that a Swiss measurement institute measured COP > 10 00 has to be carefully documented (and published), nobody will believe it from hear say.

Please publish the measurements concerning "2 of the 3 main devices" you mention.

"A looped back device" (a self running device) which can be observed running uninterrupted for some days and which can be measure by independent observers would be a big help. And it is exactly that which nobody can provide when making OU claims.

Greetings, Conrad

P.S.: Again, Richard Vialle discovered something very interesting, you have collected information and you have made good videos about something interesting, but the OU claim needs something really substantial and carefully documented and freely published, or you will be just one of the many people claiming OU without substance. Claiming OU is not a light matter, you go against several hundred years of science. And to make people believe you, more than words or paper is necessary. It is particularly bad to say "this is a secret, I can not tell you that, this will be protected by a patent therefore I can not tell or show you that, and so on". If there are secrets to be guarded, please shut up and keep them.

Big COP has been measure with equipement I have not. I have no HF wattmeter nor physic test equipement of an official measurement institute.

But with a poor equipement you can have COP>300 or COP>500 as I got.

If you aren't interested of COP>1 process and need COP>10 000 measure to be interested, I can't do nothing.

Loop system has been described but I did not realize it myself beacuse electronic must be designed to have a low loss (because you have 10 watts only outoutting) oscillator+ pre-ampli+ampli and that costs a little. I have done affordable things: using the lab materiel I have.

Big COP have been measured at an official institute. What can be done is to give you the adress where the measurement was done. Do you wait that I buy such equipement for your pleasure? I am not a millionnaire. You can do like me and having hundreds of COp with little investment.

And you can design your own powering electronic device to have a loop if not convinced of your measurements. I have not designed such an electronic. But Richard VIALLE has had sponsors who did it. Their powering electronic is their intellecual property and will not be given; but it is not something weird: normal oscillator+ pre ampli+ ampli. I did not design it because it cots about 1000$ to design it as a self running system. For what? For a loop. But it will not give something more than a loop with 10 watts.

What is more interesting is to have more output power, so the loop will be easy: using output power to power lab material.

Anybody claiming proofs and demanding to have me or anybody buying material to have so can wait eternally. All is given here so everybody can do it himself and measure himself. If one is not satisfied, he can buy himsel material to measure or go to his local physic institute to bring his built replica and have his proof.

I am here to spread what has been made by Richard VIALLE. I made him myself, and one of his friend too. We verified that it worked are our mission on earth is not to satisfy everybody asking to do this or that to have their proof. I present what we get, honnestly; we did it with individual money and time and if you want to be fed with your ideally proof, you can provide yourself; I can't do more.

This is a working forum for people willing to work on project, this is not a drive service "please the proof, with film, reports, and hurry". We give what we have. You want to reproduce or test by yourself: it is great. You want more than we have: you won't have. if you want things like you want, do it yourself! YOU can test, measure and see. schema is affordable to reproduce for somebody with lab material (oscillator, generator , amplificator). If you have so it will cost additional 30$ to design the system, if you don't have, then see those who will do it. I myself could'nt do many things because I have not the material.

Pacuser you say "Big COP have been measured at an official institute. What can be done is to give you the address where the measurement was done."

Well, is there any documentation at this official institute? If there is, it might also be interesting for you to get it and to publish it here. It would enhance your credibility.

An OU claim does not work by saying "build it yourself and you will see".

If you make an extraordinary claim, please back it up by extraordinary evidence.

What I see in your videos is a very slow moving balance using up electricity to drive a disk. How one can ever extract even the energy used by the motor driving the disk, is beyond me. That would be a really difficult engineering task.

When I say, I am more interested in the "gravity effect", is does not mean that I believe the OU claim. Since this is an OU forum, I addressed the OU aspects of the system.