Originally posted by KrazyIvan
If the colonel had his way this would not be the USA anymore. it would be the USSSA. The United Soviet Socialist States Of America, and instead of
starts and stripes we'd be under the hammer and sickle. im sure that that doesnt upset some of you. but something needs to be done and fast. because
of clinton we have started a gradual decenst to communism that shrub must clean up the trash that the previous administration left behind and that the
previous administration let happen to this great nation. i.e. 9/11

KrazyIvan

You see Clinton as the greatest threat to the position of the United States of America, and Colonel as the second greatest threat.

I agree with you. You need to do something, fast. Talk to your parents about it first.

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
If the colonel had his way this would not be the USA anymore. it would be the USSSA. The United Soviet Socialist States Of America, and instead of
starts and stripes we'd be under the hammer and sickle. im sure that that doesnt upset some of you. but something needs to be done and fast. because
of clinton we have started a gradual decenst to communism that shrub must clean up the trash that the previous administration left behind and that the
previous administration let happen to this great nation. i.e. 9/11

KrazyIvan

You see Clinton as the greatest threat to the position of the United States of America, and Colonel as the second greatest threat.

I agree with you. You need to do something, fast. Talk to your parents about it first.

hey man im going to be president one day. that or chairmen of the joint cheifs. ill do somethign about it.

First off for all of you liberals out there, ya'll are the one's who created the "lower class of people" who are ruining America and the world.
The United States Democratic is going where Russia already went. Rosovelt started all of this neo-socialist crap. At least back then people were
working; now they just sit around and suck money awat from others.

The two reasons that you "need" welfare:
1.) You are poor
Get a job

2.) You have too many kids
Well who's fault is that

I'll go ahead and tear apart all of the American Democrats in history:

Lincoln - Your hero.

Lincoln freed the slaves as a tactic of war, he didn't give a rat's @$$ about the slaves and equality. If it wasn't for
Robert E. Lee stomping all over the union, we'd have no need for freedom, and we would still have slaves.
Rosovelt - The "New Deal"

The beginning of American socialism.
Clinton - Let the UN boss him around and screwed us over in Bosnia. The US doesn't need to listen to that hedgemony of third-world countries.
Libermen/Sharpton/Clark/Dean/Kerr, etc.... No campaign platform except socialist utopia for all and Bush isn't a good leader.

That about does it for you, anyone who'd denying this is an ignorant fool.
Cheers to all who understand reality,
- Tass

What do you see the course of action will be that the American people take back the powers and rights that have been absconded from them?

Neither party is going to give them back, so how will this be fixed?

I've been trying to think of how we might resolve this peacefully, without starting a civil war. The only hope for this, that I can see, is the
slim to none chance that a large majority of the American public will realize what's happening BEFORE the next "terrorist" attack. If enough
people were to band together and present a united front against the criminals which have stolen the country, they would have to surrender OUR
government. The only other option they would have is to reveal their true colors and attempt to strong arm their opposition with the military. I can
only hope that, were that to occur, the rest of the US citizens would wake up and join the fight. If the rich have no one to control, then they have
no control.

Unfortunately, if nothing is done before those in power declare Marshall Law, the ONLY alternative left will lead to a Civil War. If that happens,
there is going to be a lot a pain, loss, and death. More and more, it seems like this is going to be what happens. Very few care enough to risk
their middle class comforts and customs to fight for them. Napoleon Bonaparte said, "A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights"
and we seem to be proving him right.

It doesn't work to just vote, as we have seen. It's too easy to control and steal the election. Especially now that they are switching to the
computerized voting machines. Everyone just has to forget their political affiliations, stand up, and say "ENOUGH! We want our government back!"

What a lot of people don't realize is that EVERYTHING would have to be reworked. Our monetary system would have to be removed from the hands of the
bankers and started fresh, under the control of the United States, again. It would result in another depression (the 1st one was when the Federal
Reserve actually took control of the majority of the US to begin with) and most people would lose almost everything.

We would have to rely on the aid of our fellow countrymen again, and they would rely on us. The entire way we live would change. Food would be
scarce because the wealthy manufacturing companies would be bankrupt. The crash of the stock market would stop pharmaceutical production as well. We
would have to learn to survive without Prozac and Ritalin.

We would also have to learn to treat illnesses through more readily available means.

The government is training, now, to seize control of food, water, and utilities, in the event of a "civil disturbance". War is hell, and it would
be worse than hell for those who weren't the least bit prepared. Those who couldn't hack it, would saddle up next to whomever they thought would be
victorious, in hopes of regaining some of form of their previous lifestyle.
Friends and family would die, be lost and be gained. All of this would be happening before & during the battle between the "Patriots" and the
fascist government.

If the citizens of America were the victors then people would have to start living all over. We would need to return to the original Constitution and
decide what needed to be changed, added and REMOVED in order to make it applicable to our present time. The suppressed amendment, which prevented
lawyers from holding office, should DEFINITELY be replaced.

And all other issues should be worked out in much the same way as they were the first
time.
Everyone would be forced to take responsibility for the choices they make. They would have to relearn the benefits of kindness and empathy. They
would understand what it is like to be the farm worker in the fields. They would learn, hopefully, to value life as the privilege it is and stop
taking it for granted.

If one thing is learned from the whole mess, though, I hope it will be that NO ONE of any race, religion, sexuality or social status is
superior to any other. The illusion of superiority is what has gotten us into this mess to begin with. One race thinking it's better than another.
One religion thinking it is better than another. The rich thinking they can own and control those not as fortunate. And none of these fools, have
ever even noticed that the whole reason people are different is so that we can all learn different things from each other.

Originally posted by Colonel
Conservatives who once ridiculed and obstructed the former president's aggressive efforts to fight terrorism...

LOL I stopped reading right there.

If I found a blatant lie like that in the first paragraph, there is no telling what kind of garbage the rest was laced with.

Look, Colonel, the bottom line is this. Had Clinton ACUTALLY been agressive towards terrorism, 9/11 would have never happened? How, you ask?
I'm glad you did! Ask yourself this; Who would have financed 9/11 had bin Laden been taken prisoner as offered by the Sudanese government in 1996?
Or ask yourself this; Where would all 19 of those terrorists and their suicidial buddies have trained had Clinton been agressive after
the initial WTC bombing in 1993?

Don't kid yourself, buddy. Clinton was great for the economy, but he didn't know how to balance priorities.

First of all, TASS, Lincoln was a Republican. I only know that because the repugnants love to call themselves "The Party of Lincoln" as if thats
supposed to excuse their repulsiveness.

Secondly, about this bull# "liberals created the lower class." That's an UNADULTERATED LIE. I suppose you wanna go back to the Industrial
Revolution, the days of the robber barons where there was strictly only rich and poor. The days where you can happily work 12-16 hours a day everyday
with no overtime. You want that child labor going on. You want to get paid barely nothing on the dollar. That's what you want.

If it weren't for libreals and their enlightened ideals with unions and their willingness to fight, you'd be slaving right now for a bowl of soup,
asking "Sir, me I please have some more."

Stop your bull# lying, Tass.

Thirdly, Robert E. Lee will forever be an ass and a LOSER.

Lastly, the restr of what you have is made up crap, imprinted into your simian brain by Faux News.

First off for all of you liberals out there, ya'll are the one's who created the "lower class of people" who are ruining America and the world.
The United States Democratic is going where Russia already went. Rosovelt started all of this neo-socialist crap. At least back then people were
working; now they just sit around and suck money awat from others.

The two reasons that you "need" welfare:
1.) You are poor
Get a job

2.) You have too many kids
Well who's fault is that

I'll go ahead and tear apart all of the American Democrats in history:

Lincoln - Your hero.

Lincoln freed the slaves as a tactic of war, he didn't give a rat's @$$ about the slaves and equality. If it wasn't for
Robert E. Lee stomping all over the union, we'd have no need for freedom, and we would still have slaves.
Rosovelt - The "New Deal"

The beginning of American socialism.
Clinton - Let the UN boss him around and screwed us over in Bosnia. The US doesn't need to listen to that hedgemony of third-world countries.
Libermen/Sharpton/Clark/Dean/Kerr, etc.... No campaign platform except socialist utopia for all and Bush isn't a good leader.

That about does it for you, anyone who'd denying this is an ignorant fool.
Cheers to all who understand reality,
- Tass

Originally posted by Colonel
Conservatives who once ridiculed and obstructed the former president's aggressive efforts to fight terrorism...

LOL I stopped reading right there.

If I found a blatant lie like that in the first paragraph, there is no telling what kind of garbage the rest was laced with.

Look, Colonel, the bottom line is this. Had Clinton ACUTALLY been agressive towards terrorism, 9/11 would have never happened? How, you ask?
I'm glad you did! Ask yourself this; Who would have financed 9/11 had bin Laden been taken prisoner as offered by the Sudanese government in 1996?
Or ask yourself this; Where would all 19 of those terrorists and their suicidial buddies have trained had Clinton been agressive after
the initial WTC bombing in 1993?

Don't kid yourself, buddy. Clinton was great for the economy, but he didn't know how to balance priorities.

Who financed bin Laden? The Saudis. Probably STILL fianancing him now. But there are so many attacks that he averted and terrorist cells that he
destroyed---oh, forget it. You make up more busll# yet you forget the Millineum Plot, tyhe plot on the Israeli Embassy in DC, the plot to take out the
needle in Seattle. The list goes on.....And I have SHOWN you documented proof but, you have difficulty reading long paragraphs.

Bush is in office for the first year and we have the worst attack on American soil in history.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.