Yes, there are two Americas’ Virginia, they exist as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist. One tolerant and broadminded, the other intolerant and narrow-minded!
Sincerely, thinkingblue, from the TOLERANT AND BROADMINDED USA
PS: Joe (You Lie) Wilson, et al reside in the other America!

Number
one reason to vote for Obama: A Romney administration would
culminate in war. It wouldn’t take much to spark an all out
cataclysmic event where many human beings will suffer and die.
That is the nature of Romney, who is aware that all his riches
will keep he and his family safe somewhere during war, while the
rest of us endure the abject misery of world conflict. A Romney
win would be a Jackpot for the neocons (who have been waiting
patiently in the shadows after their last total failure, to try,
try again.) just like 9/11 was a win for them in abstract. (Read: Neocons ‘pushed’
mindless Bush into ‘idiotic war’ — Chris Matthews http://mondoweiss.net/2012/08/neocons-pushed-mindless-bush-into-idiotic-war-chris-matthews.html)

Romney
represents to the neoconservative ideology, a puppet, just like
George W. Bush did. They can and will bend him shape him to
fulfill their dream of whipping the world nations, who they
believe to be adolescent and infantile in their governing and a
threat to the world, into shape or bring them into adulthood,
which they believe their credo or ideology to be. Too simple for
you, just remember it was the PNAC who penned the words "A
NEW PEARL HARBOR":

The Project for
the New American Century (PNAC) was an American think tank
based in Washington, D.C. that lasted from 1997 to 2006. It
was co-founded as a non-profit educational organization by
William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The PNAC's stated goal was
"to promote American global leadership."
Fundamental to the PNAC were the view that "American
leadership is both good for America and good for the
world" and support for "a Reaganite policy of
military strength and moral clarity." The PNAC exerted
influence on high-level U.S. government officials in the
administration of U.S. President George W. Bush and affected
the Bush Administration's development of military and foreign
policies, especially involving national security and the Iraq
War.
---
"New Pearl Harbor"

Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled
"Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the
sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even
if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long
one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing
event––like a new Pearl Harbor".

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were
complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as
commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,
investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman, and
former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner,
in CounterPunch, all argue that PNAC members used the events
of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they
needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to
"capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to
enact long-desired plans.
---
Inexperienced in realities of war

Former US Congressman Lionel Van Deerlin and UK Labour MP and
Father of the House of Commons, Tam Dalyell, criticized PNAC
members for promoting policies which support an idealized
version of war, even though only a handful of PNAC members
have served in the military or, if they served, never seen
combat.

As quoted in Paul Reynolds' BBC News report, David Rothkopf
stated:

Their [The Project for the New American Century's] signal
enterprise was the invasion of Iraq and their failure to
produce results is clear. Precisely the opposite has
happened. The US use of force has been seen as doing wrong
and as inflaming a region that has been less than susceptible
to democracy. Their plan has fallen on hard times. There were
flaws in the conception and horrendously bad execution. The
neo-cons have been undone by their own ideas and the
incompetence of the Bush administration.
More Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

Number
two reason, the fate of the Supreme Court. I have been
reiterating to all who may come within earshot of my opinion on
this subject for some time now, the importance of an Obama win
because of the selection of Supreme Court Judges. It’s
not about Obama it’s about Life and how we will get to live
it in the future if Romney were to win. AGAIN, THINK ABJECT
MISERY, not only by war, but by restriction on freedoms.
Especially women because it’s their body that has become the
conservative 'soup de jour' since the Tea Party took control of
common sense but it will also affect men, concerning family
planning and the enslavement of free will. Romney, without a
doubt will select the most rigid (religiosity) minds to don our
supreme court, allowing this court to become our moral
(one-sided) compass, on how we will be forced to live our lives.
Bye, bye separation of Church and State!

I have been spending
much of my time researching my ancestry-line and with a browse
that went back to the early 1800’s, through all the
different unions and begets there was one life common denominator
for the women of the past: a marriage almost always resulted in
the wife being pregnant most of her adult life. There were
no thoughts, public or private about contraception, no choices
for a woman concerning her body. A pregnancy was a sentence, an
incarceration to a woman of antiquity she could do nothing but
endure. Infant mortality was also high, so was the rate of
maternal deaths:

Q: Why do so many women still die in pregnancy or
childbirth?A: Every minute, at least one woman dies from
complications related to pregnancy or childbirth – that
means 529 000 women a year. In addition, for every woman who
dies in childbirth, around 20 more suffer injury, infection
or disease – approximately 10 million women each year.
More Here: http://www.who.int/features/qa/12/en/index.html

The startling
absolutes of a Romney/Ryan win:

World War III
(Due to Neocons taking back control of USA foreign
policies)

A Religiosity
Supreme Court ready and anxious to take women back to the
age of darkness.

About Me

Yes, there are two Americas’ Virginia, they exist as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist. One tolerant and
free-thinking, the other intolerant and close-minded!
Sincerely, thinkingblue, from the TOLERANT AND FREE-THINKING USA
PS: Joe (You Lie) Wilson, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh et al reside in the intolerant America!