District News Roundup

The school board in Fort Smith, Ark., must pay lawyers' fees to
parents who took the district to court in an effort to enforce a ruling
in a special-education dispute, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The parents and the district had forged a settlement in 1992 in a
dispute over the closing of a special-education school. Under the
settlement, school officials agreed to hold individualized education
conferences for all the children affected by the closing.

When problems arose over the the timing and the content of the
conferences, the parents returned to court in an effort to enforce the
court order. The parents also asked that the district be directed to
pay their legal fees.

A federal district court in April sided with the parents over the
matter of the conferences, but it declined to award them the fees. The
court said that the district had acted in good faith in scheduling the
conferences and that the parents had failed to first try to settle the
issue out of court.

However, in June, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
said the lower court had been "unreasonable'' in faulting the parents
for failing to seek an out-of-court settlement when neither side had
tried to work out an agreement.

The court also turned aside the district's contention that a motion
to enforce a court order was not the type of proceeding for which
lawyers' fees are recoverable. The judges said federal
special-education law requires school districts to pay such fees in any
legal proceeding involving special education in which parents
prevail.

A federal judge has given the DeKalb County, Ga., school board
permission to sell $54 million in bonds to build three schools, despite
objections by the plaintiffs in the district's longstanding
desegregation case.

The plaintiffs had sought to have the bond sale delayed because they
did not approve of the proposed sites for the new schools.

The original plaintiffs wanted the schools built where they would
improve racial integration, while the intervening plaintiffs wanted the
schools built where they would do more to relieve overcrowding in
schools with predominantly black enrollments.

U.S. District Judge William C. O'Kelley last month declined to delay
the bond sale.

Although there may be better sites, the judge said, construction of
schools at the locations proposed by the district will nonetheless help
alleviate overcrowding in predominantly black schools. Moreover, he
added, further delaying the release of the bonds would only worsen
school overcrowding.

Some observers interpreted Judge Kelley's decision as suggesting
that he may soon be willing to relinquish court supervision of the
school system. The U.S. Supreme Court held last year that the district
can achieve integration incrementally and should not be asked to remedy
school segregation caused by shifts in housing patterns beyond their
control. (See Education Week, April 8, 1992.)

A high-ranking school psychologist in New York City was charged last
month with sexually abusing two teenage boys.

Pedro Cumba, a deputy director of clinical services for special
education for the city's high schools, was arrested and charged with
multiple counts of sodomy and endangering the welfare of a child. He
was released on $10,000 bail.

Between 1991 and the summer of 1992, Mr. Cumba allegedly paid the
two high school students $20 to $40 for sex several times a week in his
apartment.

Frank Sobrino, a spokesman for the district, emphasized that Mr.
Cumba did not have direct contact with students in his official
capacity. Rather, he coordinated the appointments between students and
various therapists and psychologists.

Mr. Cumba did not meet the teenagers involved in the criminal
charges through his job.

Since his arrest, Mr. Cumba has been reassigned to a purely
administrative position.

The Denver Classroom Teachers' Association has sued school officials
for failing to honor part of a 1991 pay-raise agreement.

The suit, filed in Denver District Court last month, charges that
Superintendent Evie G. Dennis and the school board violated the
teachers' contract by denying this year's 3.5 percent raise in an
effort to save the schools about $30 million in the coming year.

Leonard Fox, the union president, said he warned the board this
summer that his group would launch a court battle if the raise was not
guaranteed in the new budget.

But the district decided only to include longevity-pay hikes of
between 2 percent and 3 percent. Those raises will go to about
two-thirds of the city's teachers, Patty Murphy, a district
spokeswoman, said.

Vol. 12, Issue 40

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.