I've sort of run into a bit of a block here and any and all help would be appreciated. I just some help with formatting and adding to the article a little bit more, I've marked the particular spots with [NEEDS EXTENSION] but obviously there are other parts that I'd say would also need help. I also just need a little bit of extension on the O5 thing, maybe to tighten up on formatting since I think that may be something I can't see and which things need to be collapsible and which don't. But that's for you guys to decide. Honestly, I can't thank you guys enough for helping me out.

So the basic concept is pretty interesting to me, but I think the execution and some of the additional effects need to be refined. Firstly, the biggest problem I see is that the SCP doesn't really act much like a young child in the interviews. Their vocabulary and the complexity of their sentences is pretty far beyond what I would expect to see from a four year old. Now, this doesn't mean you can't shoot for a different age group (an angsty teenage black hole is a pretty hilarious mental image), but if you're going for a four year old I'd suggest some research into child development stages.

Secondly, I don't think the whole part with the O5s really fits with the feel of the article and I would personally omit it. It seems out of place among the interview logs and I don't see why their conversation would have even been transcribed. Lastly, I think the part about there being a dad black hole feels somewhat like a cheap way to add on more danger? I think the idea of an emotionally volatile mini black hole is dangerous and unpredictable enough on its own, I don't think you need to add that. One that note, I would personally play up the volatility of the SCP, as toddlers are notoriously prone to switching moods on a dime.

Also, I would personally classify this SCP as Keter considering that there is technically no way of containing it other than cooperation, but it's sort of borderline and I can see the justification for being Euclid as well. Keep in mind that only being contained by being appeased is a pretty big cliche when it comes to sentient scips, though I personally think it works with the concept here. Just be careful to not have the Foundation bending to its every whim, and rather have the Foundation only provide what is necessary for containment in return for compliance. Basically, avoid having the Foundation feel like a hotel or a disgruntled babysitter.

SCP-XXXX requires feeding and has displayed a liking to fresh fruit and chocolate.

-Again, a bit of an issue with clinical tone here. Example edit:SCP-XXXX has indicated that it requires "feeding", which is accomplished by introducing matter into SCP-XXXX. Organic matter is greatly preferred, with SCP-XXXX displaying a preference for fresh fruit and chocolate.

At the same time, SCP-XXXX will begin crying and babble incoherently or begin screaming at no one in particular.

-Tonal edit:During this, SCP-XXXX will vocalize its distress or begin to scream.

If aggravated excessively or still left alone, SCP-XXXX will become hostile to all surrounding lifeforms, unless a threatened entity begins displaying considerable fear and emotional distress. This causes SCP-XXXX to shrink back to its standard size and attempt to comfort the distressed entity without approaching it too closely.

-This seems like a way too obvious way to draw sympathy for the reader. To me, a more realistic reaction to being distressed for something with the mind of a toddler would be to throw a tantrum or something similar.

SCP-XXXX was described as a "hovering void with a child's brain and voice" by locals and was captured via. use of SCP-████.

-Remove the period after via

-Instead of using another SCP, perhaps they could have enticed it? Or contained it on site?

All information concerning Incident XXXX-A has been redacted from foundation documents until further notice.-O5-6

-Personally I would remove this part and just keep the incident behind the level 4 clearance collapsible.

-Also, the section with the O5's talking doesn't really make sense to me. Who recorded them and why was this recorded?

Addendum XXXX-1: SCP-XXXX has been authorized for use in termination procedures as of now but is to be confirmed by no less than two-thirds of O5 command. All tests concerning SCP-XXXX are to be monitored by the on-site Administrator at Area-64.

-Termination of SCPs is pretty rare, and there are other SCPs that could conceivably destroy most forms of matter, so what makes this SCP special in that so many SCP's would be thrown into it for termination? It just seems like an odd addition to the article.

Foreword: Certain information previously redacted has been declassified for clarity purposes. All information from here on is subject to review by the O5 council

-Again, I don't think you need the extra section that's been redacted.

Closing Statement: "I fear that this may be a bit of a catch 22, we can send this thing away and pray to god that it won't hold a grudge, we can all remember what happened after the whole [REDACTED] incident, took a lot of fucking cleaning up, but what is it we do if this thing's dad comes along? If we're to believe everything the kid said, I don't think that this will exactly be safe if somehow he finds out where his son is and if he can just teleport in here to kill us all or worse… All we can hope for is whether or not to let the kid get to his dad before the dad gets to us. On top of all this, this thing is most likely from another universe where the foundation sent him away, after examining recent dimensional anomalies we've found this universe and the planet's gone dark. Looks like we're gonna have to give this kid back wrapped in a fucking gift basket if we want a chance of survival"-O5-6

-This part seems unecessary since this is all mostly implied already. It's usually more effective from a narrative standpoint to let your readers connect the dots rather than spelling it out.

I hope you find this helpful, and good luck with your writing endeavors!