At 03:19 PM 2/7/01 -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
>> Luke Howard suggests making posixGroups auxiliary object classes to an
>> actual groupOfNames oc.
>
>would i do this by editing the nis.schema and changing the objectclass
>definition of posixGroup from having "SUP top" to "SUP groupOfNames"?
You certainly should NOT muck with existing schema.
Schema once published should be viewed as static.
You can extend it, you can replace it. Both requiring
defining new schema items with new OIDs.
Kurt