Why does it have to be in canonical lexical form?
Is this because of MTOM's requirement?
The SOAP Resource Representation Header block can exist independent of
MTOM, therefore I think it is unnecessary to say that the lexical form
must be the canonical form. Although, it is certainly true that if it
isn't in the canonical form then one cannot use MTOM to optimize it.
-Anish
--
Jun Fujisawa wrote:
>
> Hi XMLP WG,
>
> Here is a review comment to SOAP Resource Representation Header
> Last Call specification. Sorry about the late feedback.
>
> Section 2.2.4, the value of a rep:Data element is described as just
> "a base64 encoded representation" of a Web resource. I think this
> should be "a base64 encoded representation in the canonical lexical
> form".
>