Liveleak.com Rss Feed - Search results for 'zionist'http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=zionist
Search results for 'zionist'Tue, 03 Mar 2015 17:43:17 -0500Liveleakhttp://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gifLiveleak.com Rss Feed - Search results for 'zionist'http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=zionist
Nutteryahu addressing stool lickers &amp; pushers at AIPAC 2/3/2015Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:05:23 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4e9_1425391244
omniradarIsraeli PM Netanyahu Delivers Speech At Aipac Conference - America's Newsroom
It's a fucking Penguin Orgy!http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4e9_1425391244omniradarNutteryahu addressing stool lickers &amp; pushers at AIPAC 2/3/2015AIPAC, Traotors, Zionist Media, Sell Outs, Hand Clap, Retards, OMG, NetanyahoooooGame On Bibi Nertanyahu, You Isane Crazy Bastard!Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:31:02 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=82b_1425385217
omniradarhttp://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2015/03/03/515941netanyahus-big-gamble/
By Ted Snider
Consortium News
By going over President Obama's head to Congress, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is taking a big gamble, apparently hoping that he can block any U.S. rapprochement with Iran and heighten tensions in the Middle East, a strategy that lacks both facts and logic, says Ted Snider.
By Ted Snider
Consortium News
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Iranian policy not only doesn't make sense, it is becoming a threat to Israel's own self interest. The Iran policy suffers from a self-defeating paradox.
Netanyahu seems to believe that preventing America from making a nuclear deal with Iran - and, indeed, preventing America from any dealing with Iran - is essential to maintaining Israel's special relationship with America. But his very action of preventing America from making a nuclear deal with Iran is threatening Israel's special relationship with America.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Aug. 6, 2014, announced the success of Operation Protective Edge, which killed some2,000 Gazans. Netanyahu said, "The goal of Operation Protective Edge was and remains to protect Israeli civilians." (Israeli government photo)
The determination to isolate Iran and vilify it in the international community makes no sense, and the indictment is riddled with false premises.
The first flaw in the case is the very insistence by Netanyahu that Iran is building a nuclear bomb. Netanyahu has long warned that Iran is rounding the corner on the road to the nuclear bomb. But his due dates have come and gone. Why? According to the U.S., it's because Iran is not building a nuclear bomb.
National Intelligence Estimates (N.I.E.) represent the collective conclusions of the top analysts of all of America's many intelligence agencies. The 2007 N.I.E. said with "high confidence" that Iran stopped its nuclear weapons program in 2003 (there is no evidence that Iran was pursuing a nuclear weapons program before 2003 either). That conclusion has been "revalidated every year," according to former CIA analyst Ray McGovern.
The most recent N.I.E. delivered by the intelligence community provides even "more evidence to support that assessment," according to sources of investigative journalist Seymour Hersh. General James Clapper, who was responsible for preparing the N.I.E., said that "the bottom-line assessments of the N.I.E. still hold true. We have not seen indications that the government has made the decision to move ahead with the program."
When Senate Armed Service Committee chair Carl Levin asked General Clapper if the level of confidence that Iran has not restarted a nuclear weapons program was high, Clapper answered, "Yes, it is." Hersh quotes a retired senior intelligence officer as saying "none of our efforts -informants, penetrations, planting of sensors - leads to a bomb."
But that's American intelligence? Perhaps Israeli intelligence disagrees. But it has long been know that it does not. Yuval Diskin, the man who headed Shin Bet, the Israeli domestic intelligence agency, for six years, accused Prime Minister Netanyahu of "misleading the public on the Iran issue."
Lieutenant-General Benny Gantz, then Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces, insisted that Iran has not "made the decision" to pursue a nuclear weapons program and that the "Iranian leadership is composed of very rational people" who are unlikely to build a bomb.
Netanyahu only knows what his intelligence community tells him. They are his eyes and ears, and we only know what our eyes and ears tell us. But perhaps Netanyahu's certainty that Iran is building a bomb comes from higher up in his defense department.
Not according to then Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who has clearly stated that "it is not the case" that "Iran is determined to . . . attempt to obtain nuclear weapons . . . as quickly as possible." He then added rhetorically, "To do that, Iran would have to announce it is leaving the inspection regime . . . . Why haven't they done that?"
So how does Netanyahu know Iran is pursuing a nuclear bomb? He doesn't.
Failed Predictions
In September 2012, Netanyahu gave his memorable UN address in which he insisted that Iran was 70 percent of the way to completing its "plans to build a nuclear weapon," and that " y next spring, at most by next summer, at current enrichment rates, will have finished the medium enrichment and move on to the final stage."
Gareth Porter Book nat summit speech
A month later, Mossad, the Israeli foreign intelligence agency, was telling South Africa in a classified assessment that Iran was "not performing the activity necessary to produce weapons," and that Iran "doesn't appear to be ready to enrich uranium to the higher levels needed for a nuclear bomb."
On a historical timeline, Netanyahu's public international insistence that Iran was nearly finished building a nuclear bomb would overlap with his intelligence agency's private "bottom line" assessment that it was not.
The second premise of Netanyahu's argument against Iran is that it is not only pursuing a nuclear bomb, but that it would constitute a serious existential threat to Israel if it had one, because Iran had threatened "to wipe Israel off the map."
Leaving aside that Iran has a new administration now, despite the stubbornly persistent reportage by the media and charges by politicians, the former Iranian administration under President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never threatened "to wipe Israel off the map."
The mistranslation has been irresponsibly repeated despite the constant authoritative corrections. Amongst the translation errors, Iranian expert Trita Parsi states that "Ahmadinejad's statement has generally been mistranslated to read, 'Wipe Israel off the map.' Ahmadinejad never used the word 'Israel' but rather the 'occupying regime of Jerusalem,' which is a reference to the Israeli regime and not necessarily to the country."
Not only is the "Israel" part mistranslated, but so is the "wiped off the map" part. The line, according to Flint Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, is properly translated as, "this regime occupying Jerusalem must disappear from the page of time." This statement is a reference to a wish for a future time when the Israeli government no longer occupies Palestinian territory. This wish is not for the end of the state of Israel or her people, but for the end of the occupation, and is not, therefore, a threat of aggression, but a wish no different from the official wish of the United States.
Jonathan Steele adds that Ahmadinejad went on to make an analogy between the elimination of the regime occupying Jerusalem and the fall of the Shah of Iran, clearly showing that he is wishing for a regime change and not the elimination of a nation and her people, unless he is suicidally wishing for the elimination of himself and his own country.
And it is not just Iran experts who deny Ahmadinejad's murderous wish for Israel. Dan Meridor, Israeli minister of intelligence and atomic energy and the deputy prime minister at the time, admitted to his Al Jazeera interviewer that "They didn't say 'we'll wipe it out.' You are right."
Not only did Iran not threaten to annihilate Israel, it promised to recognize and open relations with Israel. At the 2002 Arab League Summit, Iran was among the signatories of the Saudi Peace Initiative that promised to recognize the State of Israel and establish normal relations with it in exchange for an Israeli withdrawal from the occupied territory and a just settlement for Palestinian refugees. The initiative was reaffirmed in 2009.
In Search of Logic
So Netanyahu's Iran policy makes little sense. Neither does his strategy for approaching that policy. Netanyahu has recently vowed to "act in every way to foil the bad and dangerous agreement" between Iran and the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus German). But his promise to sabotage the talks has backfired, and his efforts seem, not to have slowed talks between America and Iran, but, instead, threatened the special relationship between Israel and America that his efforts at sabotage are meant to protect.
It has not only placed the two allies in a position of "very real differences," as President Obamacalled it, it has led to Israel being cut out of the loop : an extraordinary shift in the relationship between two countries who seemed to share everything on Iran and the Iran negotiations. Because the Obama administration now believes that Netanyahu has cherry-picked sensitive details about the nuclear negotiations and leaked the misleading information to Israeli journalists, it has now begun to limit the scope, quality and depth of the information it shares with Israel.
So, rather than preserving or enhancing the special relationship between the two countries, the U.S. administration now perceives them as having "a conflict of interest regarding the Iranian issue." Netanyahu's Iran strategy seems to make no sense because, in his attempt to hang on to the special relationship with the U.S., his attempts to sabotage America's pursuit of its own foreign policy issues seems to have had precisely the opposite effect. America now sees Israel as a saboteur who is not allied with its interests but in conflict with them.
Netanyahu's acceptance of the Republican back-door invitation to address Congress has only enhanced this rift in the relationship. In the past, AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) could count on having its policy conference being "attended by more members of Congress than almost any other event, except for a joint session of Congress or a State of the Union address."
However, the Israeli Prime Minister's willingness to offer himself as an alternative to the American President in the American Congress has led to several members of Congress staying away from the AIPAC conference this year.
But the change in the relationship is not only demonstrated by the congressional absences. This year's American delegation will be headed by national security advisor Susan Rice and U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power, both of whom will speak at the conference. Though both speakers are high-ranking officials, the delegation seems to telegraph an important downgrade from recent years when President Obama, Vice-President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry addressed the AIPAC conference. It is also telling that no high-ranking U.S. official will agree to meet with Netanyahu while he is in Washington.
Netanyahu's actions seem to expose an Israeli vulnerability. The special relationship between Israel and the United States sprouted in the latter half of the 1960s and continued to grow throughout the Cold War when the U.S. feared Soviet encroachment into the Middle East. Different Middle Eastern states allied with different super powers, and, in return, the different super powers protected different Middle Eastern states.
Israel also feared Soviet influence in the region. In particular, Israel feared Egypt's relationship with the U.S.S.R., the U.S.S.R.'s protection of Egypt and the possibility of Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser spreading a pan-Arab communism in the Middle East. Israel offered itself as a bulwark against Soviet expansion and interference with American interests in the Middle East.
From the American perspective, then, the special relationship with Israel is based in large part on Israel being a regional ally to American foreign policy interests. If Israel takes a conflicting interest to that of America's foreign policy interests and even goes so far as to attempt to sabotage them, then the value of the special relationship becomes questionable from an American perspective.
Recently, former Mossad chief Meir Dagan has said that Netanyahu's sabotaging of American interests has put Israel at "intolerable" risk. Dagan said that "An Israeli prime minister who enters into conflict with an American administration must ask himself what are the risks. . . . The veto umbrella provided by the Americans could vanish, and Israel would promptly find itself facing international sanctions. The risks in this confrontation are intolerable."
And now Dagan has been joined by 200 retired and reserve officers all with a rank equivalent to general. The group, calling itself Commanders for Israel's Security, says that Netanyahu has become a "danger" to Israel and that he is "wreck our strategic interests with our closest ally."
Finally, Netanyahu's approach to Iran now faces one more vulnerability. The recent U.S. trial of Jeffrey Sterling has made it clear to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that countries hostile to Iran could "plant a 'smoking gun' in Iran for the IAEA to find." This real possibility may lead the IAEA to reassess some of the evidence that it has used to criticize Iran.
As James Risen revealed in State of War, the CIA passed on flawed nuclear blueprints in a bungled attempt to lead Iranian nuclear scientists down the wrong road, revealing the possibility that other documents were planted in Iran. If the IAEA reassesses evidence it has used against Iran to see if they are fake, there could be more damage to Israel from its anti-Iran strategy. Several of the most damaging pieces of evidence against Iran - including laptop documents about sites at Parchin and Marivan - have been suspected of being Israeli forgeries, as argued by Gareth Porter in his bookManufactured Crisis and, more recently, elsewhere. Revelation of Israeli forgeries to implicate Iran could damage Israel and backfire in its attempt to convict Iran of duplicitously building nuclear weapons.
Netanyahu's Iran policy makes little sense, not only because of the questionable veracity of its premises, but, perhaps even more importantly, because of the self-defeating nature of the strategy. In an attempt to preserve Israel's value to America after the end of the Cold War and the withdrawal of Russia as a threat to the Middle East, Netanyahu seems to perceive the need to maintain Iran as a threat to American interests to maintain the need for Israel as a friendly and powerful partner in the region.
But in pursuing the strategy of preserving the perception of the Iranian threat in order to maintain the special relationship with the United States, Netanyahu is pursuing strategies that sabotage America's own foreign policy interests and jeopardize the very special relationship with the United States that the strategy is meant to preserve.
Ted Snider has a graduate degree in philosophy and writes on analyzing patterns in U.S. foreign policy and history.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=82b_1425385217omniradarGame On Bibi Nertanyahu, You Isane Crazy Bastard!AIPAC, Israeli Lobby, Senate, House, Adelson,Zionist Owned Media, FOX News, MSNBC, Generals, Traitors, Un-American, Corporatocracy, Nepotism Radical Jewish Politician Boris Nemtsov's death causes <span class="highlight">Zionist</span> occupied media uproarSun, 01 Mar 2015 01:40:32 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=473_1425191898
KillPigz
Boris Yefimovich Nemtsov, scientist, statesman and liberal politician, began his political career under President Boris Yeltsin in the 1990s, and later was an outspoken critic of Vladimir Putin. He was shot dead less than 200 yards from the Kremlin walls and Red Square in Moscow.
Nemtsov, who was born to Jewish parents Yefim Davidovich Nemtsov and Dina Yakovlevna (n'ee Eidman) Nemtsova in Sochi, was in Moscow to organize a rally against Putin's invasion of parts of the Ukraine, which brought on European sanctions that are hurting Russia's economy.
On February 10, Nemtsov wrote in a news website, "I'm afraid Putin will kill me."
He was shot four times in the back, and his body was left just outside with the Kremlin.
"There is no doubt the crime was carefully planned, as well as the place chosen for the murder," former deputy energy minister Vladimir Milov wrote in his blog, "I have talked to my acquaintances who worked in special services, and I have less and less doubt that the killing of Boris Nemtsov is backed by the authorities."
Bloomberg cited opposition leader Ilya Yashin, who said Nemtsov had been getting death threats, while working on a report on Putin's involvement in the Ukraine civil war.
This isn't the first time Jewish Oligarchs and Radicals have tried to seize power and control in Russia. Nemtsov co-founded with Gary Weinstein the political opposition movement Solidarnost (Solidarity) on December 13, 2008.
The two Jewish opposition Launch Party Against Putin called "Solidarnost" : Name stolen from Polish Solidarity White party.
Garry Kasparov Weinstein and other members of the Russian opposition met Friday and Saturday, finalizing a new movement which aims to "peacefully dismantle" what they describe as the illegitimate regime ruling Russia.
Boris Nemtsov a Jew and leader of opposition against Putin.
Nemtsov speaks at New York CFR to urge Obama to meet Kasparov and Jewish Opposition to Putin.
Jewish Boris Nemtsov argued that it was essential for Obama to meet with the Weinstein-Kasparov and the "Russian" opposition. So Obama did.
President Barack Obama has invited several prominent members of the Russian opposition, including United Civil Front leader Garry Kasparov, for a meeting in Moscow. Boris Nemtsov, a chair of the Solidarity opposition movement, has also been invited to the meeting, set to take place on July 7th at the Ritz Carlton hotel.
Earlier, Boris Nemtsov argued that it was essential for Obama to meet with opposition forces in Russia. "If the White House agrees to Putin's suggestion to speak only with pro-Putin organizations... this will mean that Putin has won, but not only that: Putin will become be assured that Obama is weak," he said.
Nemtsov, who spoke at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.
Weinstein, who chairs the United Civil Front party, said it was impossible to reform the Putin-Medvedev regime, and that it needs to be completely dismantled. The economic and financial crisis was putting Russia "on the edge of catastrophe," Kasparov said, adding that the Russian authorities would have trouble keeping power as economic problems grew.
The leader of the United Civil Front, Garry Kasparov Weinstein, held a meeting at the U.S. Congress on introducing visa sanctions against senior Russian officials responsible for violations of civil rights and freedoms, and complicity in corruption. According to the Vladimir Bukovsky press center, the topic of personal sanctions was discussed in a meeting of Kasparov with U.S. Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman and Congressman James McGovern. The negotiations also involved a member of the Federal Political Council from the Solidarity party, Vladimir Kara-Murza.
Often referred to as the golden boy of Russian reform, Nemtsov in 1997 was widely considered Yeltsin's heir apparent, but another prominent Jew hinted that Nemtsov's Jewish heritage would prevent this. In a personal attack on Nemtsov at the height of his own conflict with the government over the controversial sell-off of a telecommunications giant, tycoon and politician Boris Berezovsky said: "It seems to me that Mr. Nemtsov has a purely genetic problem: He is a Boris Yefimovich, at times he is a Boris Abramovich, but he wants to be Boris Nikolayevich. You don't become a president, presidents are born."
Nemtsov's relations with his own Judaism have been rather complicated. He says he never hid his Jewish background. "I never made it a secret that my mother is Jewish because I love my mother. I'm much indebted to my mother. She has also drawn me into politics, though now she is not happy about this."
Nemtsov is a Jew.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=473_1425191898KillPigz Radical Jewish Politician Boris Nemtsov's death causes <span class="highlight">Zionist</span> occupied media uproarWorld News, Boris Nemtsov, Nemtsov, Killed, Russian Jews, Oligarchs, Zionist agents, AIPAC, Israeli Lobby, Russia, Ukraine, Nato, NWO,How <span class="highlight">Zionist</span>s Divide and ConquerTue, 24 Feb 2015 21:53:00 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b68_1424832223
ColourNotColorI dont know if its a zionist conspiracy, but i do know that there are a lot of coincidences if it is not. Hear the man out, and save the "you are anti-semitic" comments, they are boring and not the reality.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b68_1424832223ColourNotColorHow <span class="highlight">Zionist</span>s Divide and ConquerZionist, Conspiracy, David Duke Israel bypasses Obama, asks Congress for additional $300mn for missile defenseSun, 01 Mar 2015 11:56:59 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5e7_1425228919
GINOMANoi veyhttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5e7_1425228919GINOMAN Israel bypasses Obama, asks Congress for additional $300mn for missile defenseisrael,palestine,zionist,parasiteThe War Party-Panorama, neo-cons and <span class="highlight">zionist</span>s. Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:12:33 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=779_1424833586
ColourNotColorIts an old BBC documentary but it shows the mentality of the people who were pushing for the second illegal Iraq invasion and i thought rather interesting.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=779_1424833586ColourNotColorThe War Party-Panorama, neo-cons and <span class="highlight">zionist</span>s. War, Iraq, Zionist, NWOHow They Control UsTue, 24 Feb 2015 22:02:31 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cd1_1424832949
ColourNotColorThe lie box, your mind is being controlled people. Break the shackles, turn off the TV and things might become clearer.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cd1_1424832949ColourNotColorHow They Control UsConspiracy, Zionist, NWO, Peaceful revolution The assad crime dynasty has confirmed the death of another high ranking loyalist: Brigadier General Mahmoud H MustafaSun, 01 Mar 2015 06:43:22 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=86c_1425209352
Mr-CreosoteMustafa is seen in the rank of Colonel in the image used to identify him, but the crime dynasty refers to him as a Brigadier General, so presumably he was recently promoted by one rank.
Mustafa was liquidated in Quneitra Governorate.
Image two depicts 21 Lebanese shiites who were liquidated at some stage during w/c 22nd Feb, '15, by Syrian patriots in Quneitra Governorate.
All 21 were buried together in a marked mass grave following a 'tactical' retreat of their unit.
The town of Quneitra was destroyed by crazed zionist invaders in 1974, before the UN forced them to withdraw.
Three other high ranking foreign shiites confirmed killed in Syria in the final days of February '15.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ffc_1425063591
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=94a_1425045007http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=86c_1425209352Mr-CreosoteThe assad crime dynasty has confirmed the death of another high ranking loyalist: Brigadier General Mahmoud H MustafaSyria, Uprising,John Kerry(idiot): It's Time to Kill Benjamin Netanyahu's (Nutter) SpeechFri, 27 Feb 2015 11:59:33 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c6_1425055793
omniradarhttp://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/26/john-kerry-its-time-to-kill-benjamin-netanyahus-speech/
Posted by Jonas E. Alexis on February 26, 2015
Benjamin Netanyahu is almost certainly having a mid-life crisis. He probably has lots of different medications in his file cabinet.
Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic has reported that the Netanyahu administration contacted Arab ambassadors "to come to his boss's speech, emailing them personally to plead for their attendance." They all refused.
Things moved from bad to worse. National Security Adviser Susan Rice, who has defended the Israeli regime on numerous occasions, seemed to have been exhausted over the past two weeks. She seemed to have thrown in the towel by saying that Netanyahu's speech to Congress will be extremely "destructive." Chris Matthews of MSNBC-of all people!-has declared that Netanyahu has created a "crapstorm. "
Then it was John Kerry's turn to destroy Netanyahu's speech. Kerry has recently made one of the smartest moves in his political career, and one must give him some credit here. Listen to the New York Times carefully here:
"Secretary of State John Kerry reminded Americans on Wednesday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, who is expected to denounce a potential nuclear deal with Iran during an address to Congress next week, also visited Washington in late 2002 to lobby for the invasion of Iraq.
"Apparently referring to testimony on the Middle East that Mr. Netanyahu delivered to Congress on Sept. 12, 2002, when he was a private citizen, Mr. Kerry told the House Foreign Affairs Committee,
"'The prime minister, as you will recall, was profoundly forward-leaning and outspoken about the importance of invading Iraq under George W. Bush, and we all know what happened with that decision.'
"Video of Mr. Netanyahu's 2002 remarks - in which he said 'I think the choice of Iraq is a good choice, it's the right choice' - reveals that he linked his strong support for a United States invasion of Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein with the possibility of inspiring the implosion of the ruling theocracy in neighboring Iran."
Yes, we all know what happened after the Iraq war was over. From 2003 to 2012, over two thousand doctors and nurses, and over four hundred academics, have been assassinated in Iraq. Others have emigrated due to violence in the region.
In 1990, there were about thirty thousand registered doctors in Iraq. By 2008, more than fifteen thousand had already left the country. Then there is the high unemployment that has been ravaging sections of the region, combining with the fact that educational institutions have been in decline.
This is the freedom that Netanyahu and his brethren (the Neo-Bolsheviks) have brought to Iraq; this is the sort of heaven these intellectual and political geniuses have been seeking in the Middle East. And the ideological agenda of the neoconservative movement progressively attacks Christian families and decent Muslim neighborhoods in the Middle East.
The National Interest itself declared in 2010 that "the historic Christian community has been largely destroyed" in Iraq after the war, where hundreds of Christians have been killed and exiled to other countries such as Syria and Lebanon.
The report continued to say that "many advocates claim Iraq is now a great success. But not for Iraq's Christians." People like Benjamin Weinthal talked about "The Mideast's Vanishing Christians."
We are witnessing the same thing in Syria, where the Christian minority has been targeted by the Syrian rebels. And by October 2012, it was clear that by supporting the Syrian rebels, the U.S. ended up supporting "hardline Islamic Jihadis."
The rebels themselves have been known to support "senseless destruction, criminal behavior and the cold-blooded killing of prisoners." By the end of November 2012, the Syrian war had caused at least 40,000 people to leave their homeland, and
"1.2 million have been driven from their homes within the country, according to the United Nations refugee agency. Some 2.5 million people need humanitarian assistance, and the number keeps climbing."
That particular month turned out to be a bad omen for the Syrians as well, as they faced "the onslaught of winter with inadequate shelter," with many possessing "little more than a T-shirt and flip-flops." With the temperature reaching zero degrees at night, 27-year old Mohamed Khair al-Oraiby lamented, "We already wake up early because it is so cold."
In October 2012, a bomb blasted a Beirut Christian community, and the New York Times was quick to jump to the conclusion that Al-Assad was behind it, forgetting that Al-Assad has been friends with the Christian communities and that they too saw that if Al-Assad is overthrown, the Christian communities will have problems with the new regime.
According to the reasoning by the New York Times, Al-Assad was just dumb, killing his own allies for no reason. But only a week before the bombing, the Syrian rebels threatened to attack Beirut.
None of that was put into consideration by the New York Times.
Bandow did not tell us who those advocates were, nor did Weinthal describe the forces behind the vanishing Christians in the Middle East. Weinthal ended up putting the blame only on Hamas, at least in the Gaza Strip, and then on Egypt's newly elected president Mohamed Morsi. Bandow and Weinthal could not mention the forces behind those destructive movements because they probably would be out of jobs if they do.
Historian Aaron B. O'Connell of the United States Navy for example talks about "the permanent militarization of America," but dares not say that the people behind this are none other than the neoconservatives.
The neoconservative movement (or shall we say the Neo-Bolshevik movement), as I demonstrated elsewhere, is a Jewish intellectual and political movement which precipitated the war in Iraq and created political entropy in the country. Iraq was not a threat to America by any stretch of the imagination, but the neoconservatives unleashed a plethora of hoaxes and sophisticated fabrications which eventually convinced the American people that Iraq was an imminent threat.
Bush was simply a puppet in the process. Richard Perle for example bragged about how Bush knew very little about foreign policy and that he and other neoconservatives had to coach him.
" did not make decisions," Perle triumphantly declared, "in part because the machinery of government that he nominally ran was actually running him. The National Security Council was not serving properly."
Now it is Iran that is an existential threat, despite the fact that for almost three thousand years, Jewish artifacts of all kinds have played a vital role in Iran among the Jewish community, where they largely enjoyed the ambiance.
If there is an existential threat in the Middle East, it is Israel. The 1982 massacre is a classic example, where Israeli military allowed Lebanese militia to attack Palestinian refugees; they
"raped, killed and dismembered at least 800 civilians, while Israeli flares illuminated the camps' narrow and darkened alleyways."
One year later, an Israeli investigation commission found Israel "indirectly responsible" for the massacre, and Ariel Sharon an accomplice. How did the Israeli officials get the U.S. involved?
According to declassified documents found in the Israel State Archives, they convinced U.S. officials that Beirut had terrorist cells, and in the end allowed the slaughter of Palestinian civilians whom the U.S. had previously vowed to protect. Ariel Sharon said that Beirut had from 2,000 to 3,000 terrorists.
The American envoy in the Middle East, Morris Draper, basically said that Sharon was lying. Lawrence S. Eagleburger, then Secretary of State, declared that "we appear to some to be the victim of deliberate deception by Israel."
During his conversation with Sharon, Draper knew that the United States was not standing behind Sharon's evil pursuit, but Sharon ended an agreement on his own terms. It was reported that Draper told Sharon,
"You should be ashamed. The situation is absolutely appalling. They're killing children! You have the field completely under your control and are therefore responsible for that area."
After the massacre, Ronald Reagan, himself a Zionist, was outraged. Secretary of State George P. Shultz declared that the United States was also an accomplice in allowing Israel to manipulate them in order to massacre civilians. But no sanctions were pronounced on Israel. Nothing was done.
Why?
Nicholas A. Veliotes, then the assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs, gave us an indirect answer: "Vintage Sharon. It is his way or the highway." Scholar Seth Anziska declares, "The Sabra and Shatila massacre severely undercut America's influence in the Middle East, and its moral authority plummeted."
In short, perpetual wars in the Middle East are great for people like Netanyahu, but this time Kerry and the current administration are trying to tell him to slow down a bit. Netanyahu, of course, does not like that. He wants to be in charge all the time. He doesn't get to be told what to do.
But the Obama administration, unlike the Bush or Reagan administration, has made explicitly clear that Netanyahu is a "chickenshit." Moreover, the administration is trying to stop the mad man in Tel Aviv and tell him to take it easy.
For example, Bush would never have said in public that Netanyahu "may have a judgment that just may not be correct," as Kerry has said publicly. In fact, when Condoleezza Rice was trying to talk to Jewish mogul Sheldon Adelson about the two-state solutions, things did not go well. Adelson, who "is fiercely opposed to the two-state solutions," was angry at Rice.
"Then, as Adelson later told an acquaintance, Bush put one arm around his shoulder and another around that of his wife, Miriam, who was born in Israel, and said to her, 'You tell your Prime Minister that I need to know what's right for your people-because at the end of the day it's going to be my policy, not Condi's.'"
Yes, the Obama administration (with the help of Jewish Neocon Victoria Nuland) is largely responsible for agitating wars in places like Ukraine and elsewhere. Even at this present moment, the U.S. is "mulling lethal aid to Ukraine ." But there is a little progress in the Middle East because Netanyahu is not having a good time.
The administration could do more, but so long that they are not letting Netanyahu have his cake and eat it too in the Middle East, we should at least be somewhat grateful for the moment.
Perhaps if every decent citizen sends the administration a letter saying that we are supporting them if they are opposing Netanyahu's wicked plan, the administration would probably be encouraged to do more.http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c6_1425055793omniradarJohn Kerry(idiot): It's Time to Kill Benjamin Netanyahu's (Nutter) SpeechPLEASE STILL DO IT, Netanyahoooooo, Crazy, Crown Agent, Extremist, Cuckoooo, Rothschild, Crown Corporation Of London, Parasites, HOAX FALSE FLAG: copenhagen attack denmarkFri, 27 Feb 2015 08:39:00 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bde_1425040813
Hamas-Warrior
I'll try to translate french sentence to english by google ==) sorry:
1-plastic mannequin was a big nose.why ? because I believe that witnesses had seen the terrorist with a big nose AND why the police had touched the nose of omar (photo taken in a car) just to deceive witnesses that it s the same personne..it's said that the zionists are known to have big noses! supect it was the Zionist Ashkenazi?
2-ALL medias had not translated sentence said by the Danish media :witness and police ( it's officiel)said that the supect had white skin than normal that is to say a white , Arabic and VERY white is not tacked ..this sentence was ignored by the media is replaced by a (......) .
3- Danish m'edias mock the description that s is an Arab because how a hooded distinguished from an arab and Danish medias admit that half of the Danish population have an Arabic appearance
4- the supect used a M95 : this weapon is used by snipers and by professionals( specials forces)while the terrorists prefer Kalashnikov and why has not used this weapon against syngogue and commented able to transport this weapon in a small bag how could escape the first attack of coffe moore securised coffee? AND RETURNED to synagogue to kill Jews but how syngogue knew that was full on the day of sabbath midnight how was aware of the time and date Coffee Conference and that was a French ambassador in a coffee alosr after 9/11 and charlie hebdo haox Muslims were well supervised +how an offender could lead 2 well-planned attack
5 -people said that this was an Arab size 185 m size although this is the size of player baskeetball so DAN UZAN THE JEW is a victim or 1 of 2 suspects ( mossad agent) because the police and witness even speaks about 2 individuals
6- photos taken by omar with a knife in his hand have been retouched and how is it possible that cars or buses are occupied by several surveillance cameras I believe that Omar has been followed and the plot was self ready for long time
7-most notably French media say the title of discussion in copenhagen coffe was: Islamization and freedom of speech "course to draw the conclusion that whoever takes advantage of this attack is a Muslim especially with the presence of Lars( lie) Vilks but if we change the title "holocaust and freedom of expression" everyone will pull the concluion than who benefits from the attack are sionsites ..you see the media propaganda and how they fool the sheep: or the title was: art, balsphemyand freedom of expression
ok sorry if I forgot not to translate others that escape mehttp://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bde_1425040813Hamas-Warrior HOAX FALSE FLAG: copenhagen attack denmarkdaesh, isis, islamic state, irak,daech,copenhagen, false falg and plot,islam, zionists, jews, talmud, charlie hebod, terroristsInternet Needs to Be "Regulated" to Suppress Videos and Search Results Deemed "Anti-Semitic", French President SaysThu, 26 Feb 2015 15:19:08 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=42a_1424981737
Letito
French President Francois Hollande says modern "anti-Semitism" stems from "hatred of Israel."
( Presidency of France )
French president Francois Hollande has said his government will soon
announce a raft of tough criminal laws to crack down on anti-Semitism,
racism, homophobia and Holocaust denial.
He made the announcements in a speech to CRIF , France's main Jewish communal body and Israel lobby group, on Monday.
Hollande said that the Internet needed to be "regulated" to suppress videos and even search results deemed "anti-Semitic."
The president said that the appropriate model would be the laws used to prevent the dissemination of child pornography.
But the measures are likely only to make matters worse, among other
things by criminalizing criticism of Israel and further conflating
Zionism with Judaism.
Discipline and punish
The plans will worry civil libertarians already concerned about the crackdown on free speech since the January attacks by three French gunmen on the offices of Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish supermarket in Paris.
Hollande said that details of the draft law would be announced in coming days by his prime minister Manuel Valls .
Meanwhile, Valls recently indicated his direction of travel by declaring that his goal was to fight "Islamofascism" - a term used by the neoconservative, pro-Israel far right to demonize Muslims.
Hollande promised that the laws would become more punitive, so that "no anti-Semitic word or act goes without a response."
He promised "faster" and "more effective" punishments for "words or writing that are anti-Semitic, racist or homophobic."
Only in passing, toward the end of the half-hour speech, did Hollande
mention that anti-Muslim hate attacks in France in January alone
exceeded the entire number recorded in 2014.
He did not announce any specific measures to combat this alarming phenomenon.
The president observed that "Muslims are the first victims of
Islamist or jihadist terrorism, whether in the Middle East or Africa,"
and called for more international military intervention in those
regions.
Hollande did not consider that it was "Western" interventions in
Syria, Iraq, Libya and elsewhere that gave rise to the menace known as
Islamic State (for an excellent account of that, see Patrick Cockburn's
new book The Rise of Islamic State ).
Conflating anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel
Hollande's speech also confirms the direction hinted at in earlier statements that France is likely to take more measures to suppress criticism of Israel in the name of combating anti-Semitism.
The president told CRIF that anti-Semitism has ancient roots, but asserted that "a more recent source is hatred of Israel."
But if this is the case, who decides what is "anti-Semitic"? If all
anti-Israel and anti-Zionist statements will be considered anti-Semitic
then hundreds if not thousands of publications in tens of languages will
have to be banned by France.
Hollande shared some disturbing statistics: in 2014 there were twice
as many "anti-Semitic acts" recorded as in 2013 and ten times more than
before the year 2000.
Lest I be accused of "justifying" these acts, let me be clear:
nothing, including Israel's crimes against Palestinians, justifies
insulting or attacking Jews as Jews.
But can it be a mere coincidence that 2014 was the year of Israel's
latest horrific massacre of Palestinians in Gaza that was fully backed
by the United States and most EU members, including France?
Can it also be a coincidence that 2000 was the year the second
intifada began and Israel launched a brutal crackdown that has since
killed more than eight thousand Palestinians, often with weapons
provided by those same states?
What is the relationship between these facts?
While Hollande insists that "hatred" of Israel is a form of, or a
"source" of "anti-Semitism," he does not acknowledge the role of Israel
in generating the intense hostility sometimes misdirected against Jews.
The Palestinian national movement has always correctly insisted that
its enemies are not "the Jews," but rather Israel and the Zionist
colonial movement.
Yet it is Israel that continues to insist that it acts in the name of all Jews everywhere.
It is Benjamin Netanyahu who apparently considers himself not just prime minister of Israel but the leader of world Jewry.
It is Israel that has taken the symbols of the Jewish religion -
including its most recognized one, the Star of David - and affixed it to
uniforms and weapons of destruction and death that are used to carry
out atrocities in Palestine and Lebanon.
It is Zionists who have taken holy scriptures and claimed that they
provide a license for modern day Brooklynites and Parisians to violently
steal land from Palestinian villagers.
It is Israel's government-financed settlers who torch Palestinian mosques and daub their walls with " biblical phrases ."
It is Israel-government-backed religious fanatics who yearn - and plan - to destroy the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem and replace it with a "Jewish temple."
It is Israel that has used the Paris Grand Synagogue as a recruiting base for its army and it is Israeli army commanders who cite Hebrew scripture to justify laying waste to Gaza.
Violent radical Judaism?
If we can say that the horrific actions of Islamic State are a
perversion of the beliefs of the vast majority of the world's Muslims,
can we also not say that Zionism is a perversion of Judaism?
CRIF insists that
the Paris attacks be labeled "Islamist." By the same logic, should we
label Israel's crimes acts of "violent radical Judaism?"
While anti-Zionist Jews, secular and religious, have always insisted
that Israel and Zionism do not represent them or their religion or
cultures, politicians like Hollande reinforce the false and dangerous
association between Jews as Jews on the one hand and Israel's violent
racist colonialism against Palestinians on the other.
Some misguided youths, hearing these messages, may indeed believe
Israel's claim that "the Jews" are the enemies of the Palestinians and
direct their anger or hatred towards Jewish targets.
They may hear the Islamophobic diatribes emanating from many
right-wing and liberal supporters of Israel and also conclude - falsely -
that "the Jews" are the enemies of "the Muslims."
The message has to be clear always and is worth repeating: words or
acts targeting Jews as Jews are never a form of solidarity with
Palestinians.
We must be equally clear that opposing and resisting Zionism is not
anti-Semitic, but a struggle for liberation for Palestinians and indeed
for Israeli Jews.
Repeating history
In his address to CRIF, Hollande spoke about the "Israeli-Palestinian
conflict" in the bland terms of the defunct "peace process."
He reaffirmed France's commitment to the fantasy of the "two-state
solution," offered to host a "peace conference" in Paris and said that
no matter who won Israel's elections next month, France would work with
them "in friendship and trust."
He offered not one single word of comfort or anger about the
suffering of Palestinians in Gaza where there has been no reconstruction
since Israel's summer attack devastated much of the besieged and
impoverished territory.
Hollande warned that those who do not learn from history are destined to relive it.
Yet there was not one word about accountability or justice for the
Israeli war crimes that left more than 2,200 people, including more than
500 children, dead in Gaza.
Why are 1.8 million Palestinians, mostly refugees from present-day
Israel, caged in Gaza under such abominable conditions in the first
place?
The answer is simple: their mere existence, the fact that they live and breathe as non-Jews, is considered a threat to Israel's self-declared identity as a "Jewish state."
Palestinians are in a ghetto because of who they are and France's president has nothing to say about that.
Moving right
While French leaders are doing their best to pander to the prejudices of their audience, it is doubtful it will be enough.
Richard Prasquier, the former president of CRIF, went on national television to say that Hollande and Valls had not gone far enough.
CRIF's current president Roger Cukierman provoked anger from French Muslim community leaders by declaring that "all the violent attacks today are committed by young Muslims."
Cukierman also praised Marine Le Pen, leader of the racist,
anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim and traditionally deeply anti-Semitic
National Front, as " irreproachable ."
Alas Hollande's ardor to combat racism was nowhere in sight when it
came to the fanatical anti-Arab racism of Israel's leading political
parties.
CRIF heard no rebuke from the supposedly anti-racist Hollande for Cukierman's public embrace of Israeli ultra-nationalist politician Naftali Bennett , who boasts about how many Arabs he has killed and claims that Jewish settlements on occupied Palestinian land are "protecting London, Paris and Madrid."
Education reform
In his speech, Hollande announced education reforms to reinforce the
messages he gave to CRIF. But what France really needs to teach its
Jewish and Muslim citizens is that contrary to Israeli claims, Israel
does not represent Jews and that Israeli policies and Israeli crimes are
not Jewish policies or Jewish crimes.
The irony is that it might prove more difficult to convince French
Jews and French Christians of this than it is to convince French
Muslims. http://www.globalresearch.ca/internet-needs-to-be-regulated-to-suppress-videos-and-search-results-deemed-anti-semitic-french-president-says/5433663http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=42a_1424981737LetitoInternet Needs to Be "Regulated" to Suppress Videos and Search Results Deemed "Anti-Semitic", French President SaysFrance,Israel,Antisemitism,InternetHOAX FALSE FLAG:Islamic State: Yezidi and Christian women for sale Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:13:17 -0500http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=01d_1424973330
Hamas-Warrior
reference:
http://www.ibtimes.com/shia-muslims-practice-self-flagellation-walk-fire-prior-ashura-photos-709175
http://observers.france24.com/content/20141106-slave-yazidi-women-islamic-state
http://www.vosizneias.com/news/photos/view/339679091
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/photo/2014-05/07/c_133315299_2.htm
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/02/21/isis-army-7-footers-experts-say-video-copt-beheadings-manipulated/
Pilote jordanien br^ul'e vif -Jordanian pilot 'burned alive FAKE
http://www.thomaswictor.com/the-jordanian-pilot-was-not-burned-alive/
http://nodisinfo.com/burning-alive-caged-jordanian-pilot-arch-zionist-super-hoax/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG2yS5sSOSA
http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/02/08/misfire-the-burning-of-captured-pilot-kasasbeh-staged-propaganda-coalition-airstrikes/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBjrL48a3z4http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=01d_1424973330Hamas-WarriorHOAX FALSE FLAG:Islamic State: Yezidi and Christian women for sale Iraqi Yazidi women,ISIS,irak,syria,zionists,illuminati,false flag,daesh,Hoax false falg,terrorists, Mosul library,