Comments on: Why Relevant Links Are Irrelevanthttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html
The SEO Blog with attitudeSat, 19 Jul 2014 10:11:09 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5By: The Myth of the Relevant Link | Virante Orange Juicehttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-35309
The Myth of the Relevant Link | Virante Orange JuiceThu, 26 Jan 2012 16:04:21 +0000http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-35309[...] I am by no means the only SEO to doubt the veracity of these claims (here is Michael Martinez and Julie Joyce on the issue in 2007), but despite their reasoned arguments, the myth continues to [...]
]]>By: Nabilhttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-24886
NabilSat, 25 Dec 2010 09:59:02 +0000http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-24886Why would one want an irrelevant link?
]]>By: Matthttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-24267
MattFri, 29 Oct 2010 06:36:03 +0000http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-24267You can control to a certain extent where your content goes and where you receive backlinks but ultimately if a webmaster chooses to link to you then its up to them.
]]>By: Laura Designhttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-17177
Laura DesignFri, 24 Apr 2009 10:15:51 +0000http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-17177This is a great article. In terms of SEO, link building and the relevance of links should be implemented using common sense. Using keywords and links that are not specific to your website, are simply not worth having.
]]>By: Julie Joycehttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-7359
Julie JoyceMon, 17 Mar 2008 17:57:46 +0000http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-7359@Chris…excellent point. It really is a tricky situation isn’t it?
]]>By: Chris Grahamhttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-7357
Chris GrahamMon, 17 Mar 2008 16:29:28 +0000http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-7357I agree completely, but there are ways to value a link’s relevance that have nothing to do with the actual content. What?

You go a step deeper, look at the links into the site linking in to you. The more “relevant” they are to your text, the more relevant your link is.

How do I find you on StumbleUpon? Anyone that werks The Clash and The Sex Pistols into there posts is someone I want to follow. Even if the babbling side of your posts are a bit long-winded.

I sure hope you’re English. Any American thinking The Clash or The Sex Pistols is a better band than The Ramones or The Misfits should have to be deported GB.

]]>By: Brianhttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-664
BrianSun, 07 Oct 2007 08:00:18 +0000http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-664Thanks. I always wondered about this one. To think that google would be less than honest. What is this world coming to?
]]>By: Link Building this week (05-10) | Wiep.nethttp://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-640
Link Building this week (05-10) | Wiep.netFri, 05 Oct 2007 08:19:51 +0000http://www.seo-chicks.com/223/why-relevant-links-are-irrelevant.html#comment-640[...] is a much better discussion; it’s the debate of quality links. While Julie Joyce explains Why Relevant Links are Irrelevant, Debra Mastaler adds that a link is Sometimes Just a Damn Link. The third woman in this list is [...]
]]>