Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from. It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Monday, September 22, 2014

Evolution's Achilles Heels - and there is plenty of them

Darwin's cult is not about science but about philosophy.

by StFerdIII

If the theory of Evolution mutated by chance, time and luck into Achilles it would not have survived a pitched battle for a second. The various heels of Achilles in this theory of materialist-anti humanist non-science are legion and open for many an arrow. They are also absurdly obvious to any who think about the topic. Since Evolution, like the cult of warming appeals to authority [you don't have a Piled-on-High and Deep degree, ergo you can't possibly understand our 'science'...], this book uses only Pretty Happy Dude degree holders who dismiss the cult of Darwin with science. I have studied Evolution and its purported claims for many years. I have yet to find one shred of scientific proof that cyano-bacteria 3.4 billion years ago began a journey of mutations to become Barry Soetoro [aka Obama]. I left this cult because no evidence whatsoever exists for its theories. None.

In any area you look Evolution fails. Geology, the fossil record, nano-technology, bio-chemistry, DNA software complexity, chicken-and-the-egg scenarios, organ complexity, consciousness, brain activity....the list of objections to this cult are quite endless. For instance in 'Evolution's Achilles Heels', there is a chapter named 'The Origin of Life', which everyone should read. It deals with the probability that nothing could 'evolve' into complex life, or any life form for that matter. Contrary to media and educational propaganda science has not 'created life' in a lab. Nothing animate has been reproduced in sterilized, specialized conditions after billions of wasted tax dollars. No 'life' has been 'randomly' generated from non-life, nor has any living creature been tortured into 'mutating' into a different species. Nothing.

To whit:

-Each cell has about 400 polypeptides composed of 20 amino acids organized in very specific arrays.

-400 proteins per cell is by the way, the minimum for life, the actual count would be higher.

-If we use 10 conserved amino acids on average per peptide string the probability calculation for your peptides to have occurred by random chance is:

20 to the power of 3870 or in logarithmic terms 10 to the power of -5035.

According to mathematical probability theory the 'chance' that nothing would 'mutate' or 'select' [or insert Darwinian buzzword and rhetoric here]; into just the base level of polypeptides needed for a live human is 1 followed by 5000 zeroes....

In other words it is mathematically impossible for Evolution to be true.

There is simply not enough time, even using the apocryphal calculations so beloved by 'scientists' of long ages, for these protein strings to 'evolve'. Consider that there are only 10 to the power of 80 atoms in the universe, and only 10 to the power of 110 interactions possible since the supposed big bang where nothing exploded into massive 'order', some 13 billion years ago. This amount of time is massively insufficient to allow nothing to become 400.000.000.000.000.000 polypeptide proteins inside a human.

Sir Fred Hoyle, scientist and a former rabid Atheist, lost his religion of Darwin when confronted by the raw fact that there is zero probability that life can arise from non-life, or that bacteria would 'mutate', 'select' [or rhetorical tautology here], into a human biologist. He said such facts are enough 'to bury' Darwin's cult. He was right.

The single cell is more complicated than a modern urban centre. Contrary to media propaganda such complexity cannot arise by chance, and the irreducible intricacy of even a single cell marks the death knell of Darwin's cult. Mathematics says so.