Space is not necessary to the beingness of a thetan when the thetan is above the tone level of 40.0 and can create space at will. He creates space to have specific beingness. At 40.0 space and beingness can be considered to be interchangeable. Beingness can exist without any energy or matter, which is to say, without time.

There can be no space (awareness)
without substance (thought). Beingness starts out as totally harmonious
(assimilated) thought at 40.0. Above 40.0 there is just emptiness. To have
beingness there must be thought energy. The identity of the mental matrix is
expressed as “thetan”.

However, in this universe, in order to achieve a state of beingness, which is more to our point here, it is necessary to have a viewpoint from which dimension points can be created or controlled. One has as much viewpoint as he has space in which to view in relationship to other viewpoints having space in which to view, thus one has a condition of relative beingness.

At 40.0 the viewpoint
of beingness is universal (objective). The dimension points extended are part
of the beingness. The beingness is totally aware of itself. The attention units
looking at different areas may be considered different viewpoints, but they all,
being objective, are in complete agreement.

As beingness descends
on the tone scale, the viewpoints start to become narrower. They provide the
“boundary conditions” for the beingness; therefore, the original beingness starts
to break down into narrower beingnesses. Viewpoints are no longer in agreement because
there are not fully objective. Now they see a universe separate from them
populated by other viewpoints and dimension points. Here we have individuality
entering into the picture.

As the viewpoint rises
up the tone scale, the broadness of viewpoint becomes more obvious among the
individualities. This is not merging of individualities by any means. We may
call this the emerging sense of the common purpose of evolution.

Action requires space and energy
manifestations, and the definition of action could be doingness directed toward
havingness. In order to accomplish action, a preclear must be able to handle
energy.

Doingness means motion.
Thus there is energy being directed by underlying force. This is accomplished
through consciousness being shaped by the underlying desire. All this takes
place within the confines of the viewpoint.

Doingness with energy and objects as
found in the MEST universe is very far from the only method of producing
existence. This is a specialized form of behaviour and may exist in any
universe but is very peculiar to the MEST universe.

There is continual
feedback as doingness takes place. The results of what is happening always
influence what is going to happen next.

Time is an abstract manifestation
which has no existence beyond the idea of time occasioned by objects, where an
object may be either energy or matter. Time can be defined as change in space,
but where one attempts to define motion as change in space; the definition
lacks usefulness since one does not define what is changing in space; there
must be something there to change in space in order to have the illusion of
time.

As was earlier discovered in
Scientology, the single arbitrary is time. This is because time did not exist
as such but stemmed from havingness. When Man experiences “time,” he is
experiencing havingness or not-havingness.

Time is summed up as “had,” “have,”
and “will have.” Goals in the MEST universe are summed uniformly under the
heading of “will have.” One engages in action in order to have.

With force producing
motion we have energy; and with desire modifying awareness we have emerging consciousness.
As the force of desire intensifies we have consciousness condensing into more
enduring behaviors and experiences. When things are enduring they influence
what happens next.

This is one of the most important
points of processing. The individual has made a postulate to have and has then
gained something he did not want at every single point on the time track where
you find him stuck. He desired to have a castle. He may have been engaging in
an action which would gain for him a castle and was stopped and killed by an
explosion which destroyed a wall before him. The explosion caught him with a
postulate that he would have and gave him something he did not want. Struggling
with the facsimile afterwards, the auditor will find that the incident began
with the postulate to have and is now in a state of indecision since the
explosion is unwanted.

When things are enduring
it takes time to bring further changes. This is like increasing inertia slows down
the velocity (activity); or increasing complexity slows down forward progress.
It is not easy to turn things around if things don’t happen as desired.

Bluntly, any and all aberrative
incidents to be discovered in a preclear are a reversal of havingness where the
preclear did not want something and had to have it or wanted something and
could not have it or wanted something and got something else.

The entire problem of the future is
the problem of goals. The entire problem of goals is the problem of possession.
The entire problem of possession is the problem of time.

Time is impossible without possession
of objects.

People get into trouble
when it is too late to make changes. Foresight was missing. One did not predict
the outcome. Things happened that were not planned. Hindsight may show what was
missed but then it is too late. There is too much confusion. One is stuck with
what one has.

Thus is resolved one of the weightier
problems of the human mind. The auditor may find it difficult to encompass this
principle, since time may continue to exist for him as an entity, an unknown
and hovering thing. If he will use the principle that the past is had or did
not have, that the present is has or does not have and that the future is will
have or will not have, and that past, present and future are divided and
established entirely by desire, enforcement and inhibition of havingness, he
will find his preclear recovering swiftly.

Turning back the time is
basically unwinding the confusion. The whole problem of auditing is how to
unwind the confusion once it is spotted. The confusion is between what was
desired and what one ended up having. One simply unwinds this confusion.

.

FINAL COMMENTS

In Scientology, Hubbard
champions individuality that is competing intensely with other “individualities”.
It is interesting to observe that such “individuality” comes about with the narrowing
of viewpoint from a universal level. Hubbard believes that broadening of
viewpoint would merge one with universe with the loss of individuality.

Broadening one’s
viewpoint does not mean that one loses individuality and merges with others. It
simply means that one becomes capable of seeing things as they are, without any
filters. One is very much in control of one’s interests, goals and purposes while
living in cooperation and harmony with rest of the universe..

A person is motivated by
desires that guide his actions toward having individual experiences. The broad viewpoint
helps one attain knowledge and foresight with which to navigate the present
toward distant future goals. Trouble arises when viewpoints are narrow and lack
knowledge. As one lacks foresight, one may get trapped into situations where it
is too late to turn back. One is then stuck with experiences that are difficult
to assimilate. Mindfulness auditing then help one assimilate such experiences,
attain knowledge and broaden one’s viewpoint.

A human being is at the
evolutionary peak of this universe. He is very much himself but also in harmony
with rest of the universe. He is the vanguard with the responsibility of
evolving this universe further.

Comments

Hello and thank you for posting this, as today I was pondering this epitome recollected from the late 1960s, when I left home to seek my fortune and got hooked in NYC by the orgs ;-). Nevertheless, life kept me free, in this case for lack of cash, which was all well and good…

Actually I was pondering this “be-do-have business” in a new light of my current study of Pythagorean Hylozoics, (a relatively recently appearing presentation which is completely free of materialistic orgs at this point and is instead giving latent adherents a head up in their incarnations). This particular source hylozoics, (see laurency dot com), presents a simpler, more refined origination as follows.

Pythagoras originally taught that the three aspects of existence are consciousness, motion and matter which might provide a clearer basis for being, doing and having.

You write, “Pythagoras originally taught that the three aspects of existence are consciousness, motion and matter which might provide a clearer basis for being, doing and having.” I can see that.

I have recently been compiling a list of postulates to provide me with a framework, using which I can align the knowledge that I come across. What you have fits with the following postulate:
POSTULATE # 3: Energy condenses from thought to electromagnetic radiation to material objects.

COROLLARY: The innate impulse of energy condenses from considerations to flow to structure.

I am sure these postulates will have higher harmonics where they will have a more specific form. But this is something I have started to compile very recently to assimilate the tremendous amount of data that exists out there. Actually, I recently studied a bit of Pythagoras from Wikipedia.