Humanist group objects to 'In God We Trust' license plate

FILE - In a Thursday, May 10, 2018 file photo, Clay Chandler, director of communications for Gov. Phil Bryant, holds Mississippi's new standard license plate at the Capitol in Jackson, Miss. It will display the state seal that includes the phrase, "In God We Trust." The American Humanist Association, a national group that includes atheists and agnostics is objecting to Mississippi's new standard license plate design that has the phrase "In God We Trust."Rogelio V. Solis / AP

JACKSON, Miss. — A national group that includes atheists and agnostics is objecting to Mississippi’s new standard license plate design that has the phrase “In God We Trust.”

The American Humanist Association sent a letter Thursday to the state’s revenue commissioner and attorney general. It demands that Mississippi either set a new standard license plate design without a religious phrase or allow people to get another license plate design without paying an extra fee.

The association says it could sue Mississippi if the change is not made.

“Mississippi’s law violates the First Amendment rights of atheists in accordance with firmly settled Supreme Court precedent,” American Humanist Association attorney Monica Miller said in a news release. “The Supreme Court has made clear that the state cannot force motorists to display an ideological message they deem unacceptable on their license plates.”

Revenue Commissioner Herb Frierson said Thursday he’s asking lawyers to review the letter. Frierson said the design was chosen by a commission that included representatives from the governor’s office, the state Department of Revenue, the attorney general’s office and the treasurer’s office.

The new standard license plate has been sold since January. The centre shows the state seal, which includes “In God We Trust.”

The American Humanist Association’s letter to Mississippi officials cites a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in a dispute over the phrase “Live Free or Die” on New Hampshire’s standard license plate. People who were Jehovah’s Witnesses sued the state, saying the phrase was “repugnant to their moral, religious and political beliefs.”

The Supreme Court ruled that a state cannot force a person, as part of daily life, to display a phrase that violates their beliefs. Justices said the First Amendment protects “both the right to speak freely and the right to refrain from speaking at all.”

While someone might eat a Beyond Meat burger for ethical reasons, it does little for that person's health. In fact, it might be more harmful than good

This Week's Flyers

Comments

Postmedia is pleased to bring you a new commenting experience. We are committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. Visit our community guidelines for more information.