Yesterday we got some of the strongest confirmation yet that efforts to stop the Keystone XL pipeline are having a long-term impact on the tar sands industry. It’s clearer than ever that President Obama’s decision on the pipeline will have a critical impact on the development of the tar sands in Alberta – potentially leading to “stranded oil sands” long term.
Canada’s Financial Post – the premier business magazine of Canada – published an article detailing how the escalating pressure to stop Keystone XL is causing investors in the tar sands to reconsider their long term plans for exploiting the world’s second largest pool of carbon. Organizing by environmental justice advocates across the country has put the Keystone XL pipeline in question, which in turn has revealed just how important the pipeline would be to the development of the tar sands industry.
Here is the key conclusion from the Financial Post – read the whole thing here.
“The signs are there: the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline has festered into an uncomfortable election issue for the U.S. president, Barack Obama.The upshot for Canada: a decision on whether to grant a Presidential permit, promised by year end, could once again be delayed.The reality is that anything short of a go-ahead in December for Keystone XL would plunge the oil sands sector into disarray until new solutions move forward. The worst-case scenario? Stranded oil sands — for years.Keystone XL, with a capacity to carry up to 830,000 barrels a day from Alberta to Texas, was due for startup in early 2013. There is no backup on the same scale or timeline.”These reports contradict numerous earlier claims by TransCanada and tar sands industry sources suggesting that other transportation alternatives could potentially substitute for Keystone XL’s capacity should the project be rejected by President Obama. Additionally these new comments contradict the State Department’s assertion that the global warming effects of Keystone XL should not be assessed in the final national interest assessment of the pipeline, on the assumption that rejection of the pipeline would have no impact on overall tar sands production.
All signs point to the President’s decision on Keystone XL as being a turning point for the Alberta tar sands. The entire industry and all future US regulatory decisions have been deeply impacted by concerted organizing from the environmental movement, suggesting a hard road ahead for further exploitation of this deadly resource. The dedicated organizing of countless activists – including the 1253 people arrested at the White House this summer at the first Tar Sands Action, and hundreds more arrested in Ottawa in a similar protest – means that we are potentially one step closer to slowing the growth of the tar sands long term.

I’m just wondering “what next?” What if Obama approves the permit? The State Department Review and Hearing was a sham, we saw that first hand.

What if he disapproves the permit? Will we take the action to Canada, to ensure that the Tar Sands remain in the ground? The building of the XL Pipeline wasn’t “game over for the Environment,” the extraction, processing and use of the Tar Sands was.

No need to answer here, I’ll be there on the 5th, and will ask you then.

Along every pipeline there are environmentalists, biologists, archeologists ect…. that work to ensure the safety of the environment and its natural resources . You are protesting jobs that will feed our families. So you sit there in your cushy offices and warm comfy homes this winter knowing that if this pipeline is rejected my husband won’t have a job and my 3 yr old will be eating ramen noodles every night.

Do you think any of these corporate jerks care about you and your family? They have a track record of profits over environment and that’s all. Yes, you may have a job in the short term but as soon as the oil runs out, your job will disappear and all you’ll have left is a hole to sleep in and Quaker State to drink. WAKE UP LADY!
CORPORATIONS DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU!!!