Channel 9 - Discussions by dnrfanhttp://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/Dev/App_Themes/C9/images/feedimage.pngChannel 9 - Discussions by dnrfanhttp://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions
Channel 9 keeps you up to date with the latest news and behind the scenes info from Microsoft that developers love to keep up with. From LINQ to SilverLight – Watch videos and hear about all the cool technologies coming and the people behind them.http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions
enTue, 03 Mar 2015 20:28:47 GMTTue, 03 Mar 2015 20:28:47 GMTRev9000Coffeehouse - News Aggregators that have 'Toast Pop-Ups'I've come across 'Awasu' which does what I want it to.

www.sharpreader.net]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/125681-News-Aggregators-that-have-Toast-Pop-Ups/5bbdd52b1f524c6db1489deb00fe99e1#5bbdd52b1f524c6db1489deb00fe99e1
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:30:15 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/125681-News-Aggregators-that-have-Toast-Pop-Ups/5bbdd52b1f524c6db1489deb00fe99e1#5bbdd52b1f524c6db1489deb00fe99e1dnrfan13http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - News Aggregators that have 'Toast Pop-Ups'I've never used an aggregator before. I thought it would be cool to have a little box on your desktop that alerted you to something you subscribed to, but all I find are things that look like email clients.

Is there such an aggregator that does the following?.......

One that pops up a toast message - much like MSN Messenger - when something new has happened.

Scenario: Your waiting for a reply on a forum, or waiting to hear of any new posts on a forum. Your working away and 'pop' a toast pop-up appears and lets me know that someone has posted something new. Or say, scoble has another video posted up on channel
9.

Anyone know of such an agg'?]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/125681-News-Aggregators-that-have-Toast-Pop-Ups/125681#125681
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:48:26 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/125681-News-Aggregators-that-have-Toast-Pop-Ups/125681#125681dnrfan13http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - Reality CheckThe video picture quality seems to have improved.
Scoble's interviewing has improved.
Scoble's 'mad scientist's laugh' seems to have subsided.
Some of the people being interviewed seem to have been smoking pot, as they go "Ummmm errrr, ummm errrrr" a lot.
New forum design is much better. Love the way the videos are handled.
Haven't seen the 'Going Deep' series for a while. Maybe I'm blind
A lot of the videos are of people piss farting around in the hall way. Let's not waste time and bandwidth, hey?]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/120526-Reality-Check/9461c159321f4a279efa9deb00f3122d#9461c159321f4a279efa9deb00f3122d
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:20:40 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/120526-Reality-Check/9461c159321f4a279efa9deb00f3122d#9461c159321f4a279efa9deb00f3122ddnrfan96http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - MSN Messenger 7.5 beta started

wrote:

Calm down dear, it's only a Beta. You'll never know what will happen.

Messenger should always be concidered "BETA"]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/88203-MSN-Messenger-75-beta-started/98efe4075f2847178d139dec005fa69a#98efe4075f2847178d139dec005fa69a
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:44:33 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/88203-MSN-Messenger-75-beta-started/98efe4075f2847178d139dec005fa69a#98efe4075f2847178d139dec005fa69adnrfan17http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - Is MS throwing their rep down the toilet by softening the spyware detection rules?My lappy died, amd I haven't been on for ages.

Thats an aweful lot of waffle to wade through.

I can't see the part where MS have pulled their head out and done something good.

I'll have to keep looking?]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/86479-Is-MS-throwing-their-rep-down-the-toilet-by-softening-the-spyware-detection-rules/2abc28bec45a4b36ac669dec005dc18f#2abc28bec45a4b36ac669dec005dc18f
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 04:31:15 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/86479-Is-MS-throwing-their-rep-down-the-toilet-by-softening-the-spyware-detection-rules/2abc28bec45a4b36ac669dec005dc18f#2abc28bec45a4b36ac669dec005dc18fdnrfan15http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - Is MS throwing their rep down the toilet by softening the spyware detection rules?I'd like to draw people's attention to this blog article here
http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000844.html

It talks about how MS is softening the rules of detection of spyware in their MS Antispy prog.

It is believed to be the case because of MS buying Claria.

MS did a good job in building confidence in their brand by having this product, now are they throwing this rep down the toilet?

Sometimes you wonder if an interviewer has any real interest in what they're asking.

]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/64168-Forbes-Scoble-Interview/40d3d78b2cfe4d2191479dec0047c308#40d3d78b2cfe4d2191479dec0047c308
Fri, 06 May 2005 10:50:45 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/64168-Forbes-Scoble-Interview/40d3d78b2cfe4d2191479dec0047c308#40d3d78b2cfe4d2191479dec0047c308dnrfan13http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSTech Off - XP x64 UpgradeWhy? There is no point.

Apply for the 120 Trial to get you started until you find some other way.

I studied at an institution that had an software aliance agreement. We had access to most of the good stuff.]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/63940-XP-x64-Upgrade/297550f607cf4261b48d9dea011ecf25#297550f607cf4261b48d9dea011ecf25
Fri, 06 May 2005 08:17:30 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/TechOff/63940-XP-x64-Upgrade/297550f607cf4261b48d9dea011ecf25#297550f607cf4261b48d9dea011ecf25dnrfan5http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSTech Off - XP x64 UpgradeMS are giving FREE upgrades of OEM Licenced Windows XP Professional to anyone who purchased their legit copy between March 31 2003 to NOW.

]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/64099-Paul-review-Longhorn-5048/fef4db501be14bcc98649dec00479f05#fef4db501be14bcc98649dec00479f05
Fri, 06 May 2005 01:57:58 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/64099-Paul-review-Longhorn-5048/fef4db501be14bcc98649dec00479f05#fef4db501be14bcc98649dec00479f05dnrfan23http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - If Mozilla and IE didnt exist, what browser would you use?

mVPstar wrote:

And not to mention, a vast array of browsers would be insecure since there would be no IE to learn from...or to constantly look at as the cause for mostly every security flaw.

There's a difference with other browsers. All browsers have their security flaws. Right now Firefox has a serious one. The difference is that all browsers, other than IE, are NOT tied to the Operating System. Therefore, to remove a threat, even for a short
while, all you need to do is un-install that browser. The same can't be said for IE. Even though you can disable IE from use, it's still there and Windows Explorer uses that same engine. Windows Explorer is virtually the same as IE. ( MS, Step in here
and correct me if this is not thecase )

]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/36516-If-Mozilla-and-IE-didnt-exist-what-browser-would-you-use/4dfb2f5723c4480fad6e9dea013e6913#4dfb2f5723c4480fad6e9dea013e6913
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:54:24 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/36516-If-Mozilla-and-IE-didnt-exist-what-browser-would-you-use/4dfb2f5723c4480fad6e9dea013e6913#4dfb2f5723c4480fad6e9dea013e6913dnrfan28http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - If Mozilla and IE didnt exist, what browser would you use?Well, since IE hasn't care about webstandards and most/alot of websites were not designed to work in muliple browsers, I guess the internet would be pretty boring, because not many pages would render properly.

Take a look at http://mondays.pwop.com In Firefox.
This is only a minor glitch. I've seen pages all backward and upside down. I've seen pages that don't even show anything in browsers other than IE.

This forum doesn't render properly in Firefox. But it's not too bad. I like the extra buttons you get on the video windows in IE.

I thought Konqueror was great at first, but then noticed that it was pretty bad.

I hate using Opera, but if that was all that was around, I'd guess I'd use that. I don't know what Opera is based on, cause I don't care about that lame browser.

Actually, now that we are talking diving, I am intersted in where you have been diving DNRFAN.

Well, I haven't been overseas to dive. But mainly I dive around the east cost of Aust, and Adelaide ( HMAS Hobart ). Also Jervis Bay is great too. Can be seen from space.]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/35927-MSN-redefines-physics/bc2a5d82c5c04ceb9cf89dea013d9785#bc2a5d82c5c04ceb9cf89dea013d9785
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:49:01 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/35927-MSN-redefines-physics/bc2a5d82c5c04ceb9cf89dea013d9785#bc2a5d82c5c04ceb9cf89dea013d9785dnrfan11http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - MSN redefines physics...It was just an observation Jorgie, not an argument.
No software, let alone any navigational software is perfect.

It's hard enough to convince someone why they should buy xyz software, then alone something that has some errors mentioned here. I, myself don't think the issues are of any real concern, but the customers do.

I'm dealing with joe public, not IT savvy developers.
So, when someone says, "I heard that this program does this and that, I don't want that piece of garbage", I just have to hum the tune of Microsoft and tell them whatever MS's responses have been.

Jorgie wrote:

So 'durfan' where is the fantastic mapping software you have created for finding routes all over the world? We would love to see how you have done it so much better that you feel you are in a position to make such sweeping condemnation of MS software.

Never trust your life in the real world to what is represented on a computer.

When I'm diving, I would much prefer to trust a well thoughout piece of swiss engineering, than to trust a narc'd buddy, and or myself if I was feeling a bit narc'd.]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/35927-MSN-redefines-physics/d0df871393794e7da6b29dea013d96e4#d0df871393794e7da6b29dea013d96e4
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 03:06:32 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/35927-MSN-redefines-physics/d0df871393794e7da6b29dea013d96e4#d0df871393794e7da6b29dea013d96e4dnrfan11http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - MSN redefines physics...Well, that bug is an obvious one to notice, but what about paths that aren't immediately noticable?

Eg: That route could of lead the user off a cliff or through a mountain that has no roads, or down a gully etc.

You wouldn't notice that unless you knew the area well.

This is where the consumer loses their faith in MS products. They hear of something like this, and they then find it hard to trust that they are going the right way, and their money is well spent.

No one likes to be lead up the garden path.]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/35927-MSN-redefines-physics/8aca947776c644f79ecd9dea013d960c#8aca947776c644f79ecd9dea013d960c
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:07:56 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/35927-MSN-redefines-physics/8aca947776c644f79ecd9dea013d960c#8aca947776c644f79ecd9dea013d960cdnrfan11http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - .Doc is dead... Long Live .DocWhat about FlashPaper?

for one thing, a very large percentage of scientific discoveries are done while they were looking for something else. Who knows if they'll not stumble upon something that cures cancer while trying to invent a new rocket fuel or something.

Yeah but that approach is going for the proverbial 'Two birds in the bush".

I don't condemn all research, just spending so much on it for purposes that aren't that important or have immediate benefit. Knowing what a rock is composed of, is not an immediate benefit.

Sven wrote:

Condemning research just because it isn't directly tied to things your world-view holds important is extremely short-sighted; not only are you neglecting the distinct possibility that it might indirectly benefit your field of interest, you are also ignoring
the way scientific research works as a whole. I for one am glad you're not the one assigning research grants.

Your arguments are very common when something is happening in space. If money is spend to send those probes to unknown worlds, people always complain.

Because probes in outspace don't save lives.

littleguru wrote:

I can't understand it. There are a lot people involved in developing those probes. It's not that the whole thing comes out from nowhere. It gives food and work to many many people

.
To work on another useless and fruitless project. You think medical research doesn't bring these things also?

littleguru wrote:

I don't understand also, why people complain that the money hasn't been spend for health care and other welfare projects. If a government is spending billions of dollars (or any other currency) for developing new rockets and weapons

So, that's another stupid thing the US spends it's money on.

You keep saying you don't understand. Go visit a hospice and/or a third world country. Something for you to think about.]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/34671-Were-on-Titan/c94e784fb984440991749dea013c009b#c94e784fb984440991749dea013c009b
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:41:33 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/34671-Were-on-Titan/c94e784fb984440991749dea013c009b#c94e784fb984440991749dea013c009bdnrfan45http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSSCoffeehouse - the mac miniCheck out the mobo of the suckerhttp://www.mini-itx.com/news/13909018/]]>http://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/34204-the-mac-mini/b7cd77f351d44289b54c9dea013b7066#b7cd77f351d44289b54c9dea013b7066
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:19:21 GMThttp://channel9.msdn.com/Forums/Coffeehouse/34204-the-mac-mini/b7cd77f351d44289b54c9dea013b7066#b7cd77f351d44289b54c9dea013b7066dnrfan43http://channel9.msdn.com/Niners/dnrfan/Discussions/RSS