Reminds me of the threads on TSN where TO and Habs fans are constantly crying that the B's have such a favourable schedule....ridiculous. Its not like the B's not playing are somehow contributing to teams losing.....

Reminds me of the threads on TSN where TO and Habs fans are constantly crying that the B's have such a favourable schedule....ridiculous. Its not like the B's not playing are somehow contributing to teams losing.....

And if they were instead 2-11-2 the alternative view would be they were trash because they couldn't beat the teams on their favourable schedule so far.

I don't look for the third line to score much but yes the O has not been there, but in the Defensive zone they have been good plus on the PK as soon I say that Pev misses the EN

What I see is not only has that line not been scoring all season but they have the worst +/- on the team . It has been the D and top 2 lines that have been carrying this team so far. At some point the bottom 6 have to start contributing as well....

At any rate, another win...good.

Props to the the Islanders for not quitting and Nabokov for some solid goaltending.

I don't look for the third line to score much but yes the O has not been there, but in the Defensive zone they have been good plus on the PK as soon I say that Pev misses the EN

What I see is not only has that line not been scoring all season but they have the worst +/- on the team and (in this game at least) Kelly has been 45% on faceoffs. It has been the D and top 2 lines that have been carrying this team so far. At some point the bottom 6 have to start contributing as well....

At any rate, another win...good.

Props to the the Islanders for not quitting and Nabokov for some solid goaltending.

I hear you. I know what u r saying. It would be nice if Kelly and Peverley would score to balance it . I completely understand your point.

I liked the post game comments. CJ said he wanted better thrid line production. Marchand and Rask said they didn't play that well, but a win is a win. I like that the thoughts are about playing at a higher level.

I liked the post game comments. CJ said he wanted better thrid line production. Marchand and Rask said they didn't play that well, but a win is a win. I like that the thoughts are about playing at a higher level.

Rask, speaking as a team member, was right. Rask, on a personal level, was great.

I liked the post game comments. CJ said he wanted better thrid line production. Marchand and Rask said they didn't play that well, but a win is a win. I like that the thoughts are about playing at a higher level.

Rask, speaking as a team member, was right. Rask, on a personal level, was great.

I agree. And look to the Rask thread for my further comments on him. Potential for Vezina I say.

I liked the post game comments. CJ said he wanted better thrid line production. Marchand and Rask said they didn't play that well, but a win is a win. I like that the thoughts are about playing at a higher level.

Rask, speaking as a team member, was right. Rask, on a personal level, was great.

I agree. And look to the Rask thread for my further comments on him. Potential for Vezina I say.

As Bruins fans, we have been spoiled with goaltending lately with Rask and TT.