WHO RELEASED THE FACTS, THE TESTIMONIES THAT FINALLY PROVED THIS?

A REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN...

"Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA), Chairman of the House Committee on Armed
Services, decided to release the transcripts of interviews of nine
military personnel conducted between January and April of this year
regarding the attacks in Benghazi. McKeon has been saying for a while
now that he’s satisfied with the military’s response to the Benghazi attack, but it seems no one in his party is listening..."

SOME OF THE MOST RESPECTED NAMES IN THE U.S. MILITARY TESTIFIED FOR OVER 30 HOURS BEFORE A CONGRESSIONAL HEARING, AND, TO THE MAN, ALL SWORE ON OATH THAT THERE WAS NO, NOT ONE, STAND-DOWN ORDER ISSUED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OR THE WHITE HOUSE.

THEY ALL ALSO TESTIFIED THAT THERE WAS NO QUICK HELP AVAILABLE AT THAT TIME FOR STEVENS AND THE OTHERS, THAT ANY RESCUE THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN LAUNCHED WOULD HAVE ARRIVED TOO LATE.

450 PAGES OF DECLASSIFIED, BUT REDACTED, TESTIMONY BY THESE MILITARY HEADS (AND OTHERS WHO WERE THERE) WERE MADE AVAILABLE IN 2014, BUT WAS EITHER UNDER-REPORTED OR NOT REPORTED, OR WAS MANIPULATED BY THOSE LIKE FOX 'NEWS' TO CHANGE WORDS, TO DENY THAT OUR MILITARY WAS SIMPLY ILL-PREPARED AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE MAIN MISTAKES THAT COST US THE LIVES LOST.

WHEN RONALD REAGAN FAILED TO SAFEGUARD AMERICAN EMBASSIES AND WE LOST HUNDREDS BECAUSE OF THAT FAILURE, NO ONE WAS CALLED TO CONGRESS TO TESTIFY.NO FINGERS WERE POINTED AT REAGAN FROM CONGRESSIONAL SEATS, AND THE MEDIA NEVER STATED IT WAS THE ADMINISTRATION'S FAULT THAT WE LOST SO MANY LIVES IN SO MANY BACK-TO-BACK TRAGIC INCIDENTS.

AT TRIPLE RED ASTERISKS FAR BELOW ***, FIND LINKS TO TRANSCRIPTS OF THAT TESTIMONY GIVEN BY MILITARY MEN LIKE ~GENERAL CARTER HAM, HEAD OF 'AFRICOM', ~GENERAL MARTIN DEMPSEY, CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF,

~VICE ADMIRAL CHARLES LEIDIG, Jr,

~REAR ADMIRAL RICHARD LANDOLT,

~REAR ADMIRAL BRIAN LOSEY,

~BRIGADIER GENERAL SCOTT ZOBRIST, AND DO UNDERSTAND....BY CONTINUING TO INSIST THAT CLINTON OR OBAMA DID ISSUE A STAND-DOWN, YOU ARE CALLING ALL THESE MILITARY MEN, AS WELL AS SOME WHO WERE THERE, ONSITE, LIARS.

I'M WILLING TO BET THE FARM NONE WHO INSIST THESE MEN ARE LYING WOULD SAY THAT TO THEIR FACES.

C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition

Spokesmen for the White House, State Department and C.I.A. would not
comment on any intelligence operations supporting the Syrian rebels,
some details of which were reported last week by The Wall Street
Journal."DID THE CIA 'FRAG' STEVENS, INDEED THE ENTIRE COMPLEX, TO COVER UP EVEN MORE THAN WE KNOW ABOUT NOW?

Since Stevens and his staff served (KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY) as "diplomatic cover" for the CIA—only seven of more than 30 Americans evacuated from Benghazi worked for the State DepartmentIn regards to Benghazi, Petraeus had "stayed away in an effort to
conceal the agency's role in collecting intelligence and providing
security," the WSJ reported, noting that during the attack "some officials at State and the Pentagon were largely in the dark about the CIA's role."

"U.S. commandos who tried to save Ambassador Christopher Stevens and
other Americans during the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, write in a
new book that the CIA station chief held up the rescue attempt, The New York Timesreports.

Five commandos — who were former Special Operations forces and hired by
the CIA as private contractors — say the station chief ordered them to
wait 20 minutes before heading to the U.S. diplomatic mission. Three of the commandos are named — Mark Geist, John Tiegen and Kris Paronto — and the two others used pseudonyms."

BUT THERE'S MORE!FROM THE U.K. CAME AN ARTICLE NOT BOLDLY PRINTED IN ALL OUR AMERICAN MEDIA, NOT REPORTED ON OUR TV NEWS SOURCES, JUST NOT SPOTLIGHTED HERE AT ALL.THERE IS A MUDDLED, VERY QUESTIONABLE REPORT OF WHAT HAPPENED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE 'EMBASSY' CAME UNDER ATTACK BY A SINGLE CIA AGENT ASSIGNED TO GUARD STEVENS. IT READS LIKE A FAIRY TALE OF A "KNIGHT IN SHINING ARMOR" WHO FAILED TO SAVE "THE KING".

BUT, IT RAISES SO MANY QUESTIONS, MAKES SO MANY ERRORS, THAT WE MUST EXAMINE IT HERE.

"Fumbling in the dark, the American
ambassador hurriedly pulled on bullet-proof body armour over his blue
trousers and T-shirt. A shrill warning siren was sounding and the crash
of gunshots could be heard, getting closer by the second.

‘Follow
me, sir,’ urged a diplomatic bodyguard, gripping his M4 assault rifle,
shouldering an additional pump-action shotgun and looking anxiously
around him as they set out along blacked-out corridors. ‘We are under
attack.’

Weeks earlier, agents on the ground in
Libya had sent an emergency message detailing their fears that the post
was under-manned, under-gunned and under-resourced, and was not capable
of withstanding a major terrorist attack.

There were, for example, no sprinklers, smoke hoods and anti-fire foam.

But nothing had been done, and it was now too late.At
least, though, there was a specially built safe haven at the heart of
the main residence building, and it was into this room that the
bodyguard bundled Stevens and an aide, 34-year-old Sean Smith, a
communications wizard, and locked all three of them in behind its steel
mesh gate...

[THIS MEANS STEVENS AND SMITH WERE PRISONERS INSIDE THE CONSULATE, NOT BEING REMOVED TO THE SAFER 'ANNEX'.IF THERE WAS TIME TO ACCOMPLISH ALL THIS, SURELY THERE WAS TIME TO RUN FOR THE ANNEX WHERE MUCH MORE PROTECTION WAS AVAILABLE?]

"Package and one guest
secure, hunkered down,’ "Agent A' reported on his hand-held radio to colleagues
manning a command center in a neighboring barracks building.

All
the three could do was wait until rescue arrived. They could only hope
that help would reach them before the murderous bunch now ransacking the
residence did.

...Ambassador Stevens sat on the floor
in the safe room making calls on his BlackBerry to local leaders
pleading in vain for their help.

...by now the building was on fire, deliberately set alight
by the dozens of armed intruders, some of whom had now reached the safe
room and were peering menacingly through the grille. Inside, the three Americans lay low,
quiet and out of sight.

The [SOLITARY] bodyguard — unnamed in the book for security
reasons and identified only as Agent A — panned his gun sight at one
screaming balaclavaed head after another as they appeared at the grille
but held his fire rather than reveal their presence in what was now
becoming a rapidly heating oven rather than a haven. A
stifling heat built up within the safe room, as clouds of black, acrid
smoke crept in. On his knees, the bodyguard crawled through the choking
darkness to what was now the only possible exit — a small iron-grilled
window in the adjoining bathroom."[WHY DIDN'T HE TAKE STEVENS WITH HIM? WHY DIDN'T HE STEER HIM TO THIS EXIT, AHEAD OF HIMSELF?

WHY
LEAVE THE TWO BEHIND HIM WHEN THERE WAS NOTHING TO KEEP THEM FROM BEING
SHOT BY THE MOB THAT WAS LOOKING THROUGH THE GRILL'?]"With
great difficulty, he heaved it open and pulled himself out onto the
roof of the building, signalling to Stevens and Smith to follow,
believing they were right behind him."...[He] stretched his arm back through the window to
haul the other two out.No hand came to meet his. There was no sign of either of them. They were lost in the choking smoke."

ACCORDING TO THIS "HERO", IN HIS VERSION OF WHAT HAPPENED, WITH NO ONE LEFT ALIVE TO DISPUTE HIS ACCOUNT...

"Agent A — his hands already scorched, his lungs hardly able to draw
breath — plunged back into the smoke and flames to find them, not just
once but five, six times. Each time he re-emerged to gasp a few lungfuls
of air, bullets cracked around him from gunmen on the ground.

Frantic at having failed in a
diplomatic guard’s number one priority, he yelled into his radio. ‘I
don’t have the ambassador,’ he shouted at the embassy compound’s control center. The agents there
were under siege too, barricaded in and surrounded by hostile fire. Now
they gathered their strength, cleared the area outside the control
center with a grenade and then charged out... Three of them made
it across open ground to the residence and onto the roof where a
distressed Agent A was still trying to rescue the Ambassador and his
aide.

[STOP RIGHT THERE! ALL IT TOOK FOR THEM TO MANAGE, AFTER ALL THIS TIME HAD PASSED, TO REACH STEVENS' RESIDENCE (CONSULATE) WAS ONE LOUSY GRENADE?THEN WHY HADN'T THEY TOSSED THAT GRENADE SOONER?WHY WAIT WHEN THE AMERICAN AMBASSADOR'S LIFE WAS AT RISK?LOOKS LIKE THEY MANAGED TO GET THERE WHEN THEY WANTED TO GET THERE, DOESN'T IT?]

AT ABOUT THE SAME TIME, THE FORCES FROM THE ANNEX ARRIVED, WE'RE TOLD."Equipped with full battle kit, they took back control of the Mission Compound, forcing the marauders out. But for how long?

Meanwhile, back inside
the safe room, the lifeless body of Sean Smith had at last been found
and was carried out.

But there was still no sign of Ambassador Stevens.

There was no choice left for the Americans. They had to retreat or die."

[WE SEE THAT, IN "AGENT A's" OWN WORDS,
THE AMBASSADOR WAS LOCKED INTO THAT ROOM WITH SMITH, AND ARE TOLD THERE WAS BUT
ONE EXIT, SO HOW COULD HE BE MISSING, AND HOW COULD THEY NOT HAVE FOUND
HIM WHEN HE WAS LOCKED INTO THAT ONE SMALL AREA?]THE FAIRY TALE CONTINUES....

"Leaving without having
found Ambassador Stevens was a terrible decision for the diplomatic
service agents. Even supposing the man it was their job to protect was
dead, there was the gut-wrenching prospect of his body falling into
terrorist hands and being dragged through the streets, U.S. pride
trampled in the dust. But
that thought had to be put aside. Escape was the only option.

Cramming
into armored Land Cruisers, they pushed their way out of the compound."

[WHAT
A DAMNED AMAZING FEAT TO ESCAPE THROUGH SUCH OVERWHELMING ODDS, PAST SO
MANY ARMED ATTACKERS, AND MAKE IT BACK SO QUICKLY TO THEIR ANNEX!]

"The defense line was paper thin — just
a handful of American snipers in vantage points on the roof as
overhead, a U.S. Predator drone cruising backwards and forwards sent
back to the defenders vivid images of the sheer scale of the attack
being mounted against them. Not
even the seven-man hit squad of trained commandos that had finally
made it by air from the U.S. embassy in Tripoli to
back up the Americans in Benghazi could swing the situation in their favor. [THESE
COMMANDOS, AS YOU WILL SOON SEE, INCLUDED 2 WHO WERE KILLED, BUT FIVE
WHO SURVIVED SWORE THAT THE CIA STATION CHIEF DETAINED THEM, MADE THEM
WAIT A FULL 20 MINUTES BEFORE HE ALLOWED THEM TO MOVE TO RESCUE STEVENS. BY THEN, THEY IMAGINED STEVENS WAS WITH THE MEN AT THE ANNEX AND WENT
THERE.] "Short of all 34 of them dying where they stood in a last-ditch Alamo defense, they would have to get out.

Frantically,
nervous CIA agents shredded classified files and took sledgehammers to
computers and hard drives brimming with secrets, anxious that nothing
should fall into enemy hands."[THEY TOOK TIME TO DO THIS, BUT NOT TO LOCATE STEVENS?AFTER HOURS, THEY SUDDENLY DECIDE TO SHRED DOCUMENTS WHEN THE MOB IS GROWING? WHAT HAPPENED TO THE "Escape was the only option" HURRY-UP THAT CAUSED THEM TO ABANDON THE SEARCH FOR STEVENS?

WHY WASN'T STEVENS MORE IMPORTANT THAN DOCUMENTS? WHAT WAS SO IMPORTANT IN THOSE DOCUMENTS THAT THEY WERE 'SECURED' BUT STEVENS WAS NOT?]

"As
preparations were made to break out of the compound, another furious
attack began, this time with an even deadlier weapon — mortars."

Perched up on a roof, two former Navy
Seals, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods [3 OF THE COMMANDOS FROM TRIPOLI], were picking off the attackers
with their Mk 46 automatics when a mortar shell hit their position.
Woods died instantly, his friend Doherty seconds later, killed by
another mortar round. Shrapnel cut down other defenders.

The battle was about to be lost,
Americans slaughtered, their nation humbled. But the Libyan army saved
the day.

As the sun rose, Special Forces soldiers from its Military
Intelligence section came barrelling in with orders to get the Americans
out of the country as quickly as possible. The terrorist mob was driven
back.

As the Muslim morning
call to prayer echoed around Benghazi, 32 weary survivors packed
themselves and crate-loads of CIA equipment into a convoy of vehicles
and drove under escort to the airport for a rapid exit from this place
of destruction and death. They carried with them the bodies of Smith,
Doherty and Woods. "

[SMITH HAD BEEN RIGHT BESIDE STEVENS, REMEMBER? THEY CARRIED SMITH'S BODY TO THE ANNEX.DOHERTY AND WOODS WERE UP ON A ROOF.

SOMEONE HAD TO GO UP THERE TO RETRIEVE THOSE 2 BODIES, AMIDST 'HEAVY SHELLING AND GUNFIRE'.ACTUALLY, AS WAS REPORTED LATER, THE TWO BODIES OF THE COMMANDOS WERE THROWN FROM THE ROOF TO THE GROUND BELOW, SO WE MUST ACCEPT THE WORD OF THOSE WHO DID THAT THAT THOSE TWO WERE ALREADY DEAD.THEY LUGGED OUT CIA EQUIPMENT, BUT NO AMBASSADOR?]

WHILE
THE CIA OPERATIVES CLAIM THEY COULD NOT FIND SMITH'S BODY, THE LIBYANS
FOUND IT IMMEDIATELY, RIGHT THERE IN THAT "SAFE ROOM", IN THAT SMALL AREA
WHERE HE AND SMITH HAD BEEN LEFT BY "AGENT A"!

"At
the now deserted Mission Complex, looters wandered into the still
burning remains of the ambassador’s home. Abandoned weapons, furniture,
iPods, mobile phones, the ambassador’s clothes, his luggage, cigars,
bottles of water — everything was carried off in triumph.Eventually
they forced their way into the safe room — and there was Stevens’s
blackened body. It was carried out, laid on the ground, propped up to be
photographed and the pictures flashed around the world to be gawped at."

WRONG!STEVENS
WAS STILL ALIVE AT THAT TIME AND WAS ALIVE WHEN HE ARRIVED AT A LOCAL
HOSPITAL, THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN STATED HE WAS SUFFERING FROM "FATAL
ASPHYXIATION" FROM THE SMOKE! WE HAVE VIDEO EVIDENCE HE WAS STILL ALIVE IN THAT SAFE ROOM, RIGHT WHERE "AGENT A" LEFT HIM TO MAKE HIS ESCAPE!

THE SO-CALLED "LIBYAN RESCUERS" OF THE 34 AT THE ANNEX WENT TO THE 'CONSULATE', FOUND STEVENS THERE, TOOK HIM TO HOSPITAL

IT WAS LATER PROVEN THAT THE "BLACKENED BODY" AND THE PHOTOS OF STEVENS BEING SODOMIZED WERE FAKE.

"A year on [THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN IN SEPT. 2013], the Benghazi raid is the
focus of bitter contention in the U.S., where accusations are made by
senators and conspiracy theorists alike that the Obama administration
covered up — and continues to obscure — failings that led to an
ambassador and three other Americans dying in such horrendous
circumstances.

Why was the
attack not anticipated by intelligence sources? Why were warnings
ignored that the mission building was inadequate for its job?

The questions seem even more pointed in the light of allegations that the survivors have been silenced."

NOT ALL WERE SILENCED AND NOT THE TOP BRASS OVERSEEING BENGHAZI.

BUT
CONGRESS AND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ARE FAILING TO PUBLISH THEIR
ACCOUNTS, FAILING TO SET THE RECORD RIGHT, FAILING, AS ALWAYS, TO SHINE A
LIGHT ON THE TRUTH, FAILING TO DEMAND ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS SUCH AS THE ONES WE ASK HERE.

WHY HIDE THE REAL REASONS STEVENS AND THE OTHERS DIED?WHY NOT GO AFTER THOSE WHOM WE KNOW DID GIVE A STAND-DOWN ORDER, DID HOLD UP THE RESCUE TEAM FROM TRIPOLI?

WE MAY NEVER HAVE THE ANSWERS, BUT WE OUGHT TO!

I'D LIKE AN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION OF EXACTLY WHO WAS CHARGED WITH PROTECTING STEVENS, WITH SECURING HIS SAFETY AT ALL TIMES, AND AFTER WE LOOK UNDER EVERY ROCK FOR THE SNAKES WE KNOW EXIST IN "COVERT OPS", WE JUST MAY FIND THAT ANSWER.

HISTORY TEACHES US HOW MANY TIMES SOME HAVE BEEN RULED "EXPENDABLE" AND HAVE PERISHED BECAUSE SOMETHING NEEDED TO BE COVERED UP, HIDDEN, "PROTECTED".

WE'VE SEEN 'FALSE FLAGS' CARRIED OUT TO PIN THE WRAP ON OTHERS EVER SINCE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR, FALSE FLAGS TO GARNER THE SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AGAINST SELECTED ENEMIES.

WE'VE SEEN "ERASURES" ACROSS THE DECADES WHEN OUR "SECRET SERVICES" FELT THAT SOMEONE MIGHT BLOW THEIR COVER, OR BLOW THE WHISTLE, OR MAYBE JUST INTERFERE WITH WHAT WAS PLANNED, "IN SECRET".

WE SAW AMERICAN SERVICEMEN ABANDONED TO THEIR FATE AS POWs IN LAOS, CAMBODIA, OTHER PLACES WHERE AMERICA WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO HAVE TROOPS, "LEGALLY".

SEVERAL U.S. AGENCIES HAVE BEEN BUSTED GUN-RUNNING, DRUG-DEALING, CREATING 'COUPS', INSTIGATING CIVIL UNREST IN OTHER NATIONS, EVEN SPYING ON OUR ALLIES.

DENIAL OF SUCH THINGS IS LUDICROUS, AND A LIE IN ITSELF.

WHEN SENATORS, EVEN MILITARY HEADS, WERE "SHOCKED" TO LEARN THE CIA HAD SUCH A SETUP AS IT HAD IN BENGHAZI, RED FLAGS SHOULD HAVE GONE UP ALL ACROSS AMERICA.

INSTEAD, WE WERE DIVERTED FROM ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CIA BY THE WALL STREET-CONTROLLED MAJOR MEDIA AND A SET OF CONGRESSMEN WHO HAD TO BE BOUGHT BY SAME FOR THEM TO CONTINUE THESE PAST YEARS TO TRY TO BLAME ANYONE BUT THE "PRIME SUSPECTS"...THE CIA, WHO WAS GUN-RUNNING INTO SYRIA FROM BENGHAZI, WHO DID NOT PROVIDE NOR REQUEST PROPER SECURITY FOR THAT INSTALLATION...BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WANT INTERFERENCE WITH THEIR OPERATIONS, THEIR "PRISONER INTERROGATIONS" THAT THE LOCALS FOUND OUT ABOUT?

THE TESTIMONIES QUOTED BY SOME MAJOR MEDIA AND LINKED BELOW, AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE TO READ ONLINE, SHOULD HAVE TURNED THE ATTENTION OF "CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS" IN A WHOLE NEW DIRECTION. WHY DIDN'T THEY?WHY WON'T THE DAMNABLE CONGRESS NOW, TODAY, BEGIN A NEW HEARING INTO THE CIA PRESENCE AT BENGHAZI, AND STOP PLAYING POLITICS.

IT WAS POLITICS THAT WASTED TIME, MONEY, AND MAYBE LOST US SOME STAR WITNESSES TO WHAT REALLY WENT ON THOSE TWO DAYS AT BENGHAZI.

"Republicans are wasting more taxpayer funds PER DAY" than we spend on either the Veterans Affairs Committee or the Intelligence Committee."

"“These transcripts definitively show that Republican attacks against our
nation’s military service members and former Secretary of State Clinton
are completely unfounded and utterly offensive. They have been refuted
by military officials who repeatedly told our two Committees that there
was no ‘stand down’ order and that significant military assets WERE
deployed on the night of the attacks."[NOTE: THEY HAD NO CHANCE OF ARRIVING IN TIME, AS YOU WILL SEE. THEY WERE HELD UP FOR A CONSIDERABLE TIME AT THE BENGHAZI AIRPORT BY LIBYAN "INTELLIGENCE" FORCES, MADE TO WAIT 20 MINUTES TO GO TO THE AID OF STEVENS BY THE CIA STATION CHIEF, ACCORDING TO TESTIMONY.]

"Now that Chairman McKeon has made
these transcripts public, I urge Republicans who made these baseless
accusations to apologize to both Secretary Clinton and our brave men and
women in uniform.”TO HELL WITH PINNING THE WRAP ON HILLARY OR EVEN APOLOGIZING TO HER...IT'S THE MEN IN UNIFORM WHO DESERVE THE APOLOGY!

FROM THE BEGINNING, THEY HAVE TRIED, TIME AND TIME AGAIN, TO MAKE THEMSELVES UNDERSTOOD...THEY GOT NO STAND-DOWN ORDER FROM STATE DEPARTMENT OR THE OVAL OFFICE. HAM ADMITTED THE ORDER TO "STAY IN PLACE" IN TRIPOLI CAME FROM HIM.

HOWEVER, SINCE CLINTON WAS NOT GUILTY OF CALLING THE STAND-DOWN, LET'S FIND THE REAL CRIMINALS OF THE BENGHAZI AFFAIR! WE WON'T FIND THEM IN THE MILITARY, BUT MAY FIND THEM IN THE CIA?LET'S JUST UNCOVER THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH!

IF THESE MILITARY MEN DID NOT LIE, AND WHO CAN IMAGINE THAT THEY WOULD, GIVEN THEIR FEELINGS ABOUT THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IN GENERAL, THEN THE ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT LOSS OF LIFE ARE STILL FREE, PERHAPS EVEN GETTING AWAY WITH MURDER.

AND THAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE! JUST AS IT WAS NOT ACCEPTABLE WHEN WE KNEW THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION WAS AT FAULT FOR THE EMBASSIES THAT WERE ATTACKED AND THOSE LIVES LOST.THAT, TOO, SHOULD FINALLY BE REMEDIED, CORRECTED, EXPOSED, ADMITTED TO.

[THAT LINK IS A PDF WHICH DOWNLOADS INSTANTLY, AS ARE ALL TRANSCRIPTS WITH LINKS BELOW.]

"GENERAL CARTER HAM: [L]eading up to the events of 11 September, watching the
intelligence very carefully as all of us did and post attack having the
opportunity to review the intelligence, I still don't find -- I have not
found the intelligence that would indicate that an attack in Benghazi
was imminent and that subsequent security should have been deployed." WHO WAS IN CHARGE OF PROVIDING "INTELLIGENCE"?WASN'T IT THE CIA?WHY WOULD THEY RAT THEMSELVES OUT?WHY WOULD THEY WANT EXTRA SECURITY WHEN THAT MIGHT MEAN THEIR WEAPONS-RUNNING OPERATION TO THE SYRIANS WOULD BE EXPOSED?THE SECRET CIA MISSION IN BENGHAZI

In May, 2013 CNN's Jake Tapper argued that
the CIA's presence in Benghazi, where four Americans were killed in an
attack on September 11, 2012, should be scrutinized.

Congressman Frank Wolf (R-Va.) agreed, saying: "There are questions that
must be asked of the CIA and this must be done in a public way."

On Thursday Drew Griffin and Kathleen Johnston of CNN reported that the CIA "is going to great lengths to make sure whatever it was doing, remains a secret."A CAREFUL READING OF THE TIMELINE GIVEN IN THAT ARTICLE SHOULD SCREAM TO ANYONE, "LOOK! THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE!"

"At about 9:40 p.m.
local time on Sept. 11, a mob of Libyans attacked a building housing
U.S. State Department personnel. At 10:20 p.m. Americans arrived from a
CIA annex located 1.2 miles away, to help the besieged Americans. At
11:15 p.m. they fled with survivors back to the secret outpost."IT TOOK ALMOST AN HOUR TO TRAVEL JUST OVER ONE MILE? [Remember, all the "action" was at the 'consulate', they said, at that time. Supposedly, the Libyans didn't know THEN that the 'CIA annex' existed.]

IT TOOK AN HOUR TO DECIDE TO GET THE HELL OUT OF THE 'CONSULATE' AND START BACK TO THE "SECRET OUTPOST" AND NO ONE COULD LOCATE OR SEE THAT STEVENS WAS STILL ALIVE? THEY LEFT WITHOUT STEVENS, WHOM THEY SAID HAD 'PROBABLY' BEEN KILLED, BUT WHOM VIDEO FOOTAGE SHOWED TO BE STILL BARELY ALIVE HOURS LATER? THEY SOMEHOW MANAGED NOT ONLY TO GET IN, BUT ALSO GET OUT OF THE 'CONSULATE' "WITH SURVIVORS" AND SMITH'S DEAD BODY, SO WHY NOT SOONER IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, AND WHY LEAVE STEVENS BEHIND, DEAD OR ALIVE? THEY DIDN'T KNOW, OR DIDN'T CARE, WHAT TYPICALLY WAS DONE TO AMERICAN BODIES OVER THERE BY THOSE WHO HATE AMERICANS?

WHY WAS ONLY STEVENS, OF ALL WHO WERE THERE, NOT IN THE SAFER "SECRET OUTPOST"?WHY WOULDN'T STEVENS HIMSELF, AND THOSE CHARGED WITH PROTECTING HIM, HAVE MADE CERTAIN THERE WAS A DASH FOR THE SAFER, SECRET ANNEX AT FIRST SIGN OF TROUBLE? SO, AFTER AN HOUR, HIS "RESCUERS" FROM THE ANNEX BAILED OUT OF THE CONSULATE, MOSTLY CIA-HIRED PEOPLE."Armed Libyans followed them and attacked the annex with rockets and small arms from around midnight to 1:00 a.m., when there was a lull in the fighting."ATTACKED WITH ROCKETS?A ONE-HOUR ROCKET ATTACK SHOULD HAVE OBLITERATED THE PLACE.HELP ARRIVES FROM TRIPOLI

"Glen Doherty, a former Navy SEAL and CIA security contractor, was with a team of Joint Special Operations Command military operators
and CIA agents in Tripoli at the time of the attack. When they received
word of the assault on the mission, Doherty and six others bribed the pilots of small jet with $30,000 cash for a ride to Benghazi. At about 5:15 a.m., right after Doherty's group arrived, the
attackers began shooting mortars at the annex, leading to the death of
Doherty and fellow former Navy SEAL and CIA contractor Tyrone Woods. At 6 a.m. Libyan forces from the military intelligence service arrived and subsequently took more than 30 Americans — only seven of whom were from the State Department — to the Benghazi airport.THE INITIAL ATTACK BEGAN AT 9:40 pm, AND THE LIBYANS DIDN'T RESPOND UNTIL 6:00am?WHY DID IT TAKE THEM OVER 8 HOURS TO RESPOND?

FORCES ARRIVING FROM TRIPOLI ALREADY TESTIFIED THAT IT WAS LIBYAN FORCES THAT HELD THEM UP AT THE AIRPORT...FOR HOURS!

"Last week, the doctor who treated Stevens told The Associated Press that
the ambassador was nearly lifeless when he was brought by Libyans, with
no other Americans around, to the Benghazi hospital where he worked. He
said Stevens had severe asphyxia from the smoke and that he tried to
resuscitate him with no success."HE WAS ASPHYXIATED, NOT SHOT?

Though i cannot yet locate the "official cause of death" for Stevens, there was another report that he arrived in cardiac arrest.AND AN UNNAMED "AL QAEDA SOURCE" HAS SAID HE WAS GIVEN A LETHAL INJECTION.

June 4, 2013
"A State Department Accountability Review Board report and an interim
House Republican report on the attacks gave no cause of death for Stevens, whose body was recovered by Libyans in the early hours of Sept. 12.

To date, no official cause of death for Stevens has been made public, although it was reported that a Libyan doctor who examined Stevens said he died from apparent smoke inhalation and related asphyxiation. According to a March 14 posting on an al Qaeda-linked website, Dhu-al-Bajadin stated that Stevens was given a lethal injection that was overlooked during the autopsy.

LEST WE FORGET...A FEW HEADLINES ABOUT STEVENS YET BEING ALIVE AFTER THE CIA PULLED OUT WITHOUT HIM...

May 1, 2014 - Official said he received call reporting Stevens 'alive and well' ... Libya, was told Stevens was taken to a hospital controlled by Ansar Al-Shariah ...

WHAT CAUSED THE ATTACK?

ACCORDING TO PETRAEUS' MISTRESS:

"According to Paula Broadwell, the mistress of David Petraeus when he was CIA director, the CIA may have provided an impetus for the attack by holding prisoners:
"Now I don't know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had
taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner and they think that
the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners
back."CONGRESSMEN KNEW WHAT BENGHAZI WAS"The top-secret presence and location of the CIA outpost was first acknowledged
by Charlene Lamb, a top official in the State Department's Bureau of
Diplomatic Security, during Congressional testimony in October.

“I totally object to the use of that photo,” Chaffetz. said. “I was
told specifically while I was in Libya I could not and should not ever
talk about what you’re showing here today.”In November The Wall Street Journalreported that the U.S. mission in Benghazi "was at its heart a CIA operation."In May, 2013 Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) told CNN:
“I’ve actually always suspected that, although I have no evidence, that
maybe we were facilitating arms leaving Libya going through Turkey into
Syria. ... Were they trying to obscure that there was an arms operation
going on at the CIA annex? I’m not sure exactly what was going on, but I
think questions ought to be asked and answered."

The State Department "consulate" merely served as diplomatic cover for the previously-hidden annex and Stevens was there to give the whole thing credibility so the U.S. could push for a PERMANENT consulate there... a PERMANENT place from which to arrange arms shipments through Turkey. Stevens' last meeting on Sept. 11 was with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, and a source told Fox News
that Stevens was in Benghazi "to negotiate a weapons transfer in an
effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based extremists."
Syrian rebels subsequently began shooting down Syrian helicopters and fighter jets with SA-7s akin to those in Qaddafi's looted stock.WAS FOX's 'SOURCE' CIA?DID FOX FALL FOR PHONY INFORMATION...YET AGAIN?LET'S REMEMBER ALL THE WRONG INFO AND "INTELLIGENCE" THAT CAME OUT OF IRAQ PRIOR TO OUR GOING IN THERE, AND ALL THE LIES THAT WERE TOLD ABOUT 'IRAN-CONTRA', AND EVEN FURTHER BACK IN THE VIETNAM ERA, AND FURTHER BACK STILL IN KOREA.WAS STEVENS PURPOSELY PLACED, ALONE, UNGUARDED, OR EVEN WITH CIA OPERATIVES, INSIDE THAT 'CONSULATE' AND THEN IT WAS TORCHED AND CERTAIN PEOPLE MADE SURE STEVENS HAD NO MEANS OF ESCAPE, MADE CERTAIN NO ONE RESCUED HIM, BUT FAILED TO MAKE SURE HE WAS DEAD BEFORE THEY LEFT HIM THERE AND WENT BACK TO THEIR ANNEX? WAS HE LETHALLY INJECTED? IF "AL QAEDA" HAD INJECTED HIM, WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY JUST LEAVE HIM THERE WHEN TO HAVE HIS BODY FOR DISPLAY WOULD HAVE BEEN MOST DESIRABLE TO THEM?

HOWEVER, THAT VERSION, WRITTEN IN OCTOBER, 2012, STATES HE WAS FOUND DEAD BESIDE SMITH AND BOTH BODIES WERE TAKEN TO THE ANNEX.WE NOW KNOW BETTER....HE WAS TAKEN TO HOSPITAL ALIVE AFTER THE "RESCUE MISSION" WAS ABANDONED BY THE CIA FORCES... FOR THE 2ND TIME. TOO MANY QUESTIONS....NO ANSWERS, NO INVESTIGATION IN ANY DIRECTION THAT MIGHT FIND HIS KILLER(S).

_____________________________________THE TRANSCRIPTS AND FURTHER READING

SHOWS HOW RABIDLY STUPID THE "TEA PARTY" WAS IN THEIR 'REPORTING', BEFORE ALL THE TESTIMONY WAS RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC.EVERYTHING THEY ALLEGED JUST DID NOT PAN OUT!

THE PHOTO THEY CLAIMED WAS OF STEVENS HAS BEEN PROVEN NOT TO BE STEVENS.THERE WAS NEVER A RETRACTION, SO THEIR MYTHICAL ACCOUNT STANDS TO THIS DAY, BELIEVED BY A GULLIBLE PUBLIC WHO SO WANTS OBAMA/CLINTO TO BE RESPONSIBLE THEY WON'T EVEN DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION INTO WHO WAS REALLY RESPONSIBLE, EVEN AFTER 5 COMMANDOS FINGERED THE CIA STATION CHIEF! AND THE CIA-PAID LIBYANS AT THE AIRPORT.

WASHINGTON— The House Armed Services Committee today released nine
declassified transcripts of interviews jointly conducted by the
Committee and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in
connection with the September 11, 2012 attack on Americans in Benghazi,
Libya. These classified interviews were undertaken as part of HASC’s
examination of the actions of the Department of Defense before, during,
and after the attack. These interviews were conducted between January
and April 2014. The transcripts were declassified by the Department of
Defense at HASC’s request.

THE LINK BELOW LEADS NOWHERE, ALL TESTIMONIES CONVENIENTLY GIVEN TO US ON THAT ONE WEBSITE WERE ERASED, DELETED, MOVED:

NO, NO YOU CANNOT, THEY ARE REMOVED, MOVED, VERY HARD TO FIND AND ACCESS, BUT WE CAN HAVE THEM, AS YOU WILL SEE, AFTER SATISFYING YOURSELVES THAT THE ONES LISTED DIRECTLY BELOW ARE DEAD-END LINKS.

AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THIS
POST THE WAYBACK MACHINE LINK TO TAKE YOU TO ALL TRANSCRIPTS, AS WELL AS LINKS FOR OTHER TESTIMONIES. IN THOSE, YOU WILL SEE THAT EVERY MILITARY MAN QUESTIONED GAVE THE SAME ANSWER...

"NO STAND-DOWN ORDER WAS ISSUED BY STATE DEPARTMENT OR OVAL OFFICE."

AND WHO WROTE THE "INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTS" FOR THE CONGRESSIONAL HEARING?

May 5, 2014 - "When militants struck American officials in Beirut under Reagan, Congress ... in an attack on a U.S. diplomatic outpost in that remote Libyan town two ... Six months earlier, militants had bombed the U.S. embassy in Beirut, too, ...If you compare the costs of the Reagan Administration’s serial security
lapses in Beirut to the costs of Benghazi, it’s clear what has really
deteriorated in the intervening three decades. It’s not the security of
American government personnel working abroad.

May 8, 2013 - Where were you after the Sana'a attacks, Mr. Hannity? What about all of the embassy attacks in Iraq that I didn't even list here, Mr. McCain?-------BENGHAZI SCANDAL IS NOT WHAT YOU THINK.

06-17-2015

There’s a scandal going on here all right. It’s just not the one the press thinks.

Sid Blumenthal spent nine hours—nine hours—being deposed yesterday. About half an
hour was spent on the Benghazi attack. He wasn’t even asked by
Republicans about the attacks until around 6 p.m., seven-and-a-half
hours after he sat down in the chair.

The
Republicans didn’t even seem to know that Blumenthal didn’t write these
intelligence assessments, that they were written by the former CIA
operative, Tyler Drumheller, not Blumenthal, who was just passing them
along.

At one point, Darrell Issa—not a member of the
committee—sauntered in, but not being a member of the committee was
escorted out by Gowdy himself.

“It seems obvious that my appearance
before this committee was for one reason and one reason only,”
Blumenthal told me Tuesday night. “And that was politics.”

AND POLITICS, TRYING TO ELIMINATE HILLARY CLINTON FROM THE UPCOMING ELECTION, IS WHY THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS (AND A FEW DEMOCRATS) KEEP IGNORING THE CIA AS THE REAL GUILTY PARTY, THE REAL CAUSE OF THE LOSS OF LIVES IN BENGHAZI.