James David Manning : " The CIA Recruited Obama".

Originally posted by L.HAMILTON
James David Manning, A chief pastor at the ATLAH World Missionary Church in New York City, plans to hold treason trials regarding Obama on May 14-19
2010. Pastor Manning will release a transcript claiming to prove Obama was a CIA agent during the early 1980s when he was allegedly a student at
Columbia University. After watching the following video , I researched James David Manning on WikipediA and everything correlates. What ever proof
that pastor Manning has linking Obama with the CIA could be very dangerous. It sure would explain Obama's elusive history.

[edit on 18-4-2010 by L.HAMILTON]

Mr Manning carries no WEIGHT and his mock trial does nothing to OBAMA.
Its such a farce. If Manning had any validity, he would take his information before the US Congress and have the (Snip)impeached and disgraced.
However, that won't happen because the Democrats won't allow it. He's their
golden boy of opportunity to turn the Republic in a 1984 style Totalitarian Fascist state.

well if you cant have a trail without the defendant and the defendant is the "president"...then, does he get a warrant out for his arrest? Will he
lose the case if he does not show up? Or will he just get away with everything again? And if he does, are we going to do anything about it? No..we are
not, we are just going to post blogs.

Isn't this thread about James Manning and his contention that he has proof or some reason to believe Obama was a CIA agent? Ya, that....source your
looking for is actually the video in the OP....I suppose you mean that Manning's video is worthless without sources, well it is at least worth
speculation about on ATS and it is certainly worth considering the possibility of it being true up and until he has shown his "evidence", lest ye
prefer ignorance.

Actually you can have a trial without a defendant, that's like saying all one has to do to prevent prosecution is to not show up, in fact by choosing
not to show up for a trial the defendant loses by default as their avoidance is considered an admission to guilt. Of course this "trial" isn't
legal because charges have to be legally ordered and approved by people with the power to do so, this can be nothing more than a mock trial, but that
shouldn't negate the importance of a mock trial, they can be very influential.

Back when Obama was first running for president I looked back through the media reports to see where his earliest media exposure started. All
presidents have to be media darlings as part of their job requirement. In Obamas case, he made a name for himself by coming out against a book named
"The Bell Curve" which among other things stated that intelligence was heavily influenced by race. Seems reasonable that someone within the CIA
might have approached him and encouraged him to carry the torch for the rest of us and run for president.

Exactly which President did not "fudge" or even outright lie about his background. Which one did not stand in front of the American people and,
with a straight face, tell us bold-face lies?

We would love to have a truthful person as our leader, but no relatively truthful person has any chance of making it through our election process. We
will always be led by someone who will lie when needed. That includes as President, or to become President.

That is cynical, but it is, I believe, the truth of our national existence, early in the 21st Century.

Originally posted by boondock-saint
And in America you can't have a legal trial
unless u have a defendant in the court room.

in absentia

The latin word meaning" in absence of" . It refers to a term used in court to declare something in absence of , usually the defendant or
accused, who may have escaped or not attended the trial of the court during its progress

With this part, I agree. Although, if the proceedings are recorded and the documenting evidence published, it would put pressure on Obama to respond
and/or defend himself. Don't count on it getting any media attention, but I'll bet the ATS jury will give it due coverage.

In true ATS spirit this thread gets featured/front paged already??? I think I understand the board administration's and SO's conservative bent but
this is ridiculous! Does Manning have one shred of evidence for anything he alleges?

The real issue here is that a real Pastor would not get involved in garbage like this, even if it were true. His mission is a little... no ... a lot
skewed. Of course, this Pastor has some hidden things to come out from his own life yet anyway, so this may be his noose?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.