All persons while residing in California who purchased any product directly from Telebrands Corp. marketed under the names Crazy Critters, Windshield Wonder, Heeltastic, Shoes Under, Aluma Wallet, Insta Bulb, Lint Lizard, Chef Basket, EZ Combs, Edge of Glory, Pasta Boat, Bare Lifts, Perfect Fit Button, Pet Rider, Fresh Sticks, Jupiter Jack, Sticky Buddy and Robo Stir (“Products”) under the offer that they would receive an additional Product as a “bonus” or for “free” (or other similar term) at any time from October 16, 2010 to December 1, 2011, and paid a separate fee for the additional Product

This lawsuit was filed against Telebrands Corp. (“Telebrands” the “Company” or “Defendant”) in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Luis Obispo, on behalf of the Settlement Class (the “Action”). The complaint alleges that Defendant marketed its Products through advertising that consumers would receive an additional product as a “bonus” or for “free” when in reality consumers were charged and required to pay shipping, processing or handling charges in excess of what is permitted by law. The complaint seeks damages, injunctive and declaratory relief under California’s False Advertising Law, which makes it unlawful as part of an advertising plan or program, or by any other means, for a retailer to represent that the consumer will receive a free gift (or other similar term) and that as a condition of receiving the free gift, the consumer must pay money for shipping that exceeds the average cost of postage or the exact amount for the shipping or that the consumer must pay for handling that is not reasonable or exceeds the actual cost of handling or the greater of $3.00 or 80% of the actual cost of the gift item.