And yes, if one had a true original of the Rife machine, it could be
expected to work just as it did for Rife.

And yes, all the modern versions have eliminated the thing that
synchronized
its signals to the surrounding environment (both the exterior
environment
and the infolded structuring of that environment). It's precisely the
same
problem they are having in cloning. So the modern Rife machines will
vary
all over the board --- as they do. Some are better than others, etc.
and it
probably even varies by the individual machine, even of a given type and
build by a given builder.

It also explains why a French researcher or two (who seem to think they
own
the Priore name and everything) have only mixed results with their
machines
and have not really been successful as was the original Priore machine.

Hope you had a great turkey day!

Best wishes,

Tom

Tom

A couple of questions here.

In the case of the Rife machine, does the new conditioning process apply
to
the plasma tube or to the vacuum tubes which were used prior to the
discovery of the transistor? Or both?

The second question is that if, as we know, the original Rife machine
was
efficacious in the treatment of cellular diseases, and was inadvertently
using phenomenology that Rife didn't understand, then an exact
duplication
of one of his old machines, to the extent that all the component parts
and
parameters were known, would indeed incorporate this phenomenology and
be
equally effective?

i.e. the "new and improved" Rife machines (of which we have one) would
undoubtedly have inadvertently eliminated this important newly
discovered
conditioning feature.