Take action for Liberty each and every day.
Support an open press. Teknosis' continued operation and existence crucially depends on your informative contributions, donation or paying forward, partnering with or purchase of items advertised here. Thank you.

Republican presidential hopefuls Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul had an interesting exchange at the National Security Debate hosted by CNN on November 22nd. Not surprisingly, Gingrich supported the Patriot Act, going so far as to say that it should be “strengthened.” Paul argued that “the Patriot Act is unpatriotic,” because the legislation undermines American liberties. [...]

This monk (U Pyinya Zawta),. needs you

Dear Juan,

With your help, Thursday, December 1 could be the greatest opportunity in a generation to bring about genuine democracy and human rights in Burma.

On that day, Hillary Clinton will become the first American Secretary of State to visit Burma in 50 years -- a move meant to reward Burma’s military regime (which craves international recognition) for recent elections but also assess how much has actually changed.

But the military and pro-democracy forces inside Burma both know that change can’t happen when 1,600 of the country's most promising leaders, including Buddhist monks, are held as political prisoners. It’s a living nightmare -- political prisoners are held in dog cages and experience torture, beatings, and even years of solitary confinement without a single day outside their cells.

Burma's military leaders have responded to international pressure before, releasing key political prisoners. If Secretary Clinton pushes for the release of all political prisoners and other key measures for a more genuine democracy, the Burmese government will really listen.

And to her credit, Secretary Clinton has been open to calls to action by the public: Just this summer, over 22,000 people signed a petition on Change.org that resulted in Secretary Clinton calling for the right for women to drive in Saudi Arabia -- which she then did during an official visit.

As the first visit from an American Secretary of State to Burma in over 50 years, December 1 will be the biggest opportunity in many of our lifetimes to create sweeping change in Burma. Please sign U Pyinya Zawta's petition asking Secretary Clinton to call for the release of all political prisoners in Burma during her historic visit next week, and then send it to everyone you know:

In just 48 hours, more than 50,000 people (including you) signed the petition to Secretary Clinton started by former political prisoner and Buddhist monk U Pyinya Zawta.

And Secretary Clinton heard you -- throughout her three-day visit as the first American Secretary of State to visit Burma in 50 years, she called for everything you and U Pyinya Zawta asked her to, and pushed especially strongly for the release of Burma's 1,600 political prisoners. Secretary Clinton even got Burma's president Thein Sein to lay out a plan for their release despite the fact that, before her visit, he refused to even acknowledge that they existed.

Although we still have to wait to see if the government of Burma will make good on its commitments, Secretary Clinton’s visit is bringing hope to activists in Burma who have been working for democracy for decades.

U Pyinya Zawta has a message for you and the other 50,000 people who joined his call:

"To have your support and now the support of Secretary Clinton in upholding human rights and a just political process gives us all hope that a peaceful and prosperous future for our people is possible. We are very grateful to have the voices of so many people calling for positive changes in the lives of Burmese people. Thank you very much."

You don't have to be a monk or a former political prisoner to make an impact. Thousands of people start winning campaigns on Change.org every month, and change their world for the better.

Who is Newt Gingrich? / Vote Ron Paul

In 1996 Gingrich went out of his way to get 50 members of Congress to endorse Dr. Paul's opponent in the Texas primary. Even former president George H.W. Bush campaigned for Dr. Paul's opponent AT Gingrich's request. Why would the supposed leader of the conservative movement work to keep one of the Constitution's most stalwart defenders away from Washington, D.C.?

The most significant challenge to federal court jurisdiction is being filed shortly as a class action challenging the jurisdiction of the DOJ to incarcerate federal prisoners. LAW is a group dedicated to the preservation of Constitutional and Human Rights. The lawsuit, in D.C., seeks expungement plus $3,000/day/person. Cost is $2,000 to cover expenses.[1]

B. The Challenge

Our group has obtained and verified the evidence directly from Congress that Public Law 80-772 was never passed by Congress, the only statute which gives the court jurisdiction to indict and convict on any crime (Title 18, Title 21, Title 26). No court has addressed the challenge as presented properly[2], nor the evidence obtained by us directly from Congress. Over 3 years, all administrative and court remedies have been exhausted.

C. Bond Opens the Door

One of the most significant cases in recent history related to jurisdiction and the right to challenge a federal statute was ruled on by the Supreme Court on June 16, 2011. In Bond v. United States, No. 09-1227, the Supreme Court, in a 9-0 decision, ruled that Bond had “standing to challenge a federal statute on grounds that the measure interferes with the powers reserved to States”, pg. 3-14. “Anything in repugnance to the Constitution is invalid or unlawful”. Bond, supra.

Bond now opens the door for us to challenge 18 USC section 3231, part of the enactment of Title 18, which states: “The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States. Nothing in this title shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof.” Without the validity of 18 USC § 3231 a federal court must revert the powers of the federal courts back to the states. The Bond ruling provides standing for anyone to challenge 18 USC § 3231 and any crime that could have been tried by the state where you would have received less time (in many cases the state decided not to prosecute at all). See U.S. v. Sharpnack, 355 US 286 (1957). " It further specifies that "Whoever . . . is guilty of any act or omission which . . . would be punishable if committed or omitted within the jurisdiction of the State . . . in which such place is situated, by the laws thereof in force at the time of such act or omission, shall be guilty of a like [federal] offense and subject to a like punishment."

D. Services Provided By LAW

Class action challenging jurisdiction

Bondv. U.S. petitions for a reduction or elimination of sentence.

3582 crack motions.

28 USC § 2255 motions

28 USC § 2241 petitions

Complete case investigations

WHAT PEOPLE SAY

“I heard your show last night. You were awesome!!” Joe F. Cal., 9/28.11. (LAW has been on radio talk shows 6 times in the last few weeks explaining the class action.)

Over 50 wins!

Only research group accepted directly 5 times on habeas into Supreme Court!

“What you wrote is awesome!” Habeas, NDCal, 8/25/11. Karen F.

Massive Grand Jury Fraud uncovered! C.D.Cal., 6/1/11.

“You’re known for not quitting until you get results.” G. Spry, S.D.W.Va., 6/10/11.

Revised 10/22/11

WHY THE BOP DOES NOT WANT YOU TO JOIN THE CLASS ACTION

After 9 years of research, we have established conclusively by fact and law that Public Law 80-772 was never enacted by Congress, which contains 18 USC § 3231, the only statute allowing a court criminal jurisdiction, making illegal any charge or conviction.

The BOP admitted that in an internal memo from Harley Lappin, BOP Director (below). The facts in the memo have been verified. Thus any court has no jurisdiction to sentence. The BOP Budget for FY 2011 is $6.8 Billion, a 10% increase from 2010.[3] We have already caught one warden giving legal advise.[4] “Trust me, I am from the government.” Or is it about money? Below is memo:

“Attention all Department Heads, there has been a large volume of inmate Requests for Administrative Remedies questioning the validity of the Bureau's authority to hold or classify them under 18 U.S,C, §§ 4081, et seq., (1948). On the claim that Public Law 80-772 was never passed or signed In the presence of a Quorum or Majority of both Houses of Congress as required by Article I, § 5, Clause 1 of the Constitution, Although most courts have, thus far, relied on Field v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649(1892) to avoid ruling on the moots of these claims, however, there have been some which have stated that they were not bound by theField case, but those cases did not involve any Quorum Clause challenge. So out of an abundance of caution, I contacted the Office of Legal . Counsel, the National Archives and the Clerk of the House of Representatives to learn that there is no record of any quorum being present during the May 12, 1947 vote on the H.R. 3190 Bill in the House (See 93 Cong.Rec. 5049), and the record is not clear as to whether there was any Senate vote on the H,R. 3190 Bill during any session of the 80th Congress, There is only one Supreme Court case that says in order for any bill to be valid the Journals of both Houses must show that it was passed In the presence of a Quorum. See United States v. Ballin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S. 1, 3 (1892). The Clerk of the House states that the May 12, 1947 vote was a 'voice vote,' but the Parliamentarian of the House states that a voice vote is only valid when the Journal shows that a quorum is present and that it's unlawful for the Speaker of the House to sign any enrolled bill in the absence of a quorum. On May 12, 1947, a presence of 218 members in the hall of the House was required to be entered on the Journal in order for the 44 Member 38 to 6 voice vote to be legal. It appears that the 1909 version of the Federal Criminal Code has never been repealed. Therefore, in essence, our only true authority is derived from the 1948 predecessor to Public Law 80-772. “Although adjudication of the constitutionality of congressional enactments has generally been thought to be beyond the jurisdiction of federal administrative agencies, this rule is not mandatory," according to the Supreme Court in the case of Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, 510 U,S, 200,215 (1994), Therefore, the Bureau under the advice of the Legal Counsel feels that it is in the best interest of public safety to continue addressing all of these Administrative Remedy Requests by stating ,that only the Congress or courts can repeal or declare a federal statute unconstitutional.”

[1] The BOP receives about $100+ per day for each day a person is in prison. Funding comes from Congress. Lappin knew about the problem at the latest in 2009, exercised his “discretion” to leave people in prison, then the BOP submitted their FY2011 budget for $6.8Billion without advising Congress of the problem.

[1] It is understandable that the BOP is concerned. BOP was required to notify Congress re 2011 budget they had a major problem, and ask Congress to address it. Instead, concealment. Obstruction of Congress???

UPDATE ON CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT

A. All administrative remedies have been exhausted

LAW specializes in the preservation of Constitutional and Human Rights. As of August 31, 2011, LAW had exhausted all administrative remedies related to the class action lawsuit as well as all court remedies, thus freeing up LAW to file the class action.

B. Number of People on the Lawsuit

We currently have about 250 people on the class action. We anticipate having approximately 500 prior to filing. The brief has already been written and will be filed in the next few weeks. Anyone wishing to join should contact us immediately.

C. The Bond Case has Opened the Door

In their 9-0 ruling in Carol Ann Bond v. United States, 09-1227, the Supreme Court stated that any act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution is void. Lower courts are required to follow Supreme Court rulings, and we have seen an improved attitude in district courts after the Bond ruling regarding jurisdictional challenges. We currently have filed an amicus curaie brief in a case in Denver, a case in New Jersey, the government has waived argument on a habeas case in Houston, and the district judge in Miami has stated on the record that if the facts could be proven, the person would be released. One of the members of LAW has been interviewed on 6 radio talk shows regarding the petition.

D. Request for Declatory Judgment

As part of the class action lawsuit, LAW will also file a request for Declatory Judgment pursuant to 28 USC § 2201, et seq., in order to force the court to research the Congressional records and declare the statute invalid.

E. Who Is Eligible

Anyone charged with a federal crime since 1948, pretrial, post-trial, or released.

You are receiving this email because you are a member of www.AmericansRestoringAmerica.com and your email preferences are set to allow notification emails.If you want to stop receiving these emails, please sign into your account and change your preferences.If you want to be removed from our database and close your account, please reply to this email with the word REMOVE in the Subject line.Please DO NOT reply to this email EXCEPT to remove yourself from our database and close your account.This mailbox is electronically scanned for the word REMOVE in the subject line of received emails. All other email’s received will be deleted.

Please Forward Far and Wide

Help me Help others……

DISCLAIMER: Legal Information is NOT the same as Legal Advice This site provides entertainment/educational information about law designed to help users safely cope with their own legal needs. But legal educational information is not the same as legal advice. The application of law varies with an individual's specific circumstances. The laws of every state are in constant change, and although we go to great lengths to make sure our information is accurate and useful, we recommend you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information, and your interpretation of it is appropriate to your particular situation.

SPAM: We Support Responsible Email Compliance: This email cannot be considered spam as long as we include: Contact information & remove instructions. This message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.4176 - SECTION 101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress.

UNSUBSCRIBE: Not responsible for typographical errors. Further transmissions to you may be stopped at no cost to you by replying back with the word "REMOVE" in the subject line of the E-mail which was sent.

[1] A Major federal judge has agreed to hear the issue on October 28, 2011and release person upon evidence. A second major federal judge issued a show cause order to government; government waived argument.

[2] The Enrolled Bill Rule, Field v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649 does not apply to a proper challenge, because Munos Flores, Clinton v. N.Y., and Bond v. United States, all S.Ct. overturned Field v. Clark.

[3] The BOP receives about $100+ per day for each day a person is in prison. Funding comes from Congress. Lappin knew about the problem at the latest in 2009, exercised his “discretion” to leave people in prison, then the BOP submitted their FY2011 budget for $6.8Billion without advising Congress of the problem.

[4] It is understandable that the BOP is concerned. BOP was required to notify Congress re 2011 budget they had a major problem, and ask Congress to address it. Instead, concealment. Obstruction of Congress???

By Ron Paul Many people have the misconception that sanctions are an effective means to encourage a change of behavior in another country without war. However, imposing sanctions and blockades are not only an act of war according to international law, they are most often the first step toward a real war starting with a [...]

With not a lot of enthusiasm for either Mitt Romney or Barack Obama, Ron Paul may become increasingly attractive to independent and cross-over voters. At least that’s what his supporters are counting on. That headline (made up by me) is sort of true. It refers to a Public Policy Polling survey earlier this month in [...]

The oldest candidate in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, the guy born before the electric guitar, gets treated like a rock star by his youngest supporters. Ron Paul, 76, walked into the great room at Keene State College’s student center last week to chants of his name and sign-waving by kids with tussled [...]

The sneering contempt that Bob Schieffer shows Ron Paul in the interview above is something to behold. Watch it yourself, for words can’t do his dismissive manner justice. But a mere transcript of the exchange is enough to show what the CBS newsman gets wrong on the merits, and to lay bare a bias in [...]

Ron Paul is Half a Step from First Place And to see some of the media bias against Ron Paul in action check out this video segment from MSNBC. It goes five minutes and covers every GOP candidate in the race except Ron Paul. Candidates polling in the low single digits get coverage while the [...]

A secret that it will transform the entire global electrical power industry.

If there was a way for every person on Earth to reduce their electrical power consumption 10 fold would you be interested? If there was a way to drastically reduce you electrical bill would you be interested? Youâ€™re still reading so the answer to both questions is yes. The technology exists today to transform the entire electrical power industry. This same technology will eliminate power black outs caused by high electrical power demand. This technology will keep a lot of money in your wallet and not in the electrical power companiesâ€™ wallets. The electrical power companies know of this technology. It is their best kept secret. What is their secret?

The energy demand increases as the population of the World increases. The increase energy demand means regular increases in energy costs. What plays a major factor in the increase in energy costs? Oil. Even though we now have nuclear power plants and wind power fields and solar energy harnessing grids the cost of energy is still dependent on the price of oil. When the price of oil goes up the price of electrical energy goes up. So how can we get free of this oil bearing price trap? By reducing our power consumption. But how is that possible when we need more electrical energy today, not less. We need a constant supply of 1200 watts for every baseboard heater in our homes every winter. We need as much energy in the summer to power our air conditioners. So how is it possible?

You and I both know converting to florescent light bulbs isnâ€™t going to reduce our electrical power consumption or reverse global warming because electric baseboard heaters and fireplaces, air conditioners, hot water tanks, and microwaves are still being manufactured and sold and they are the ones that consume the most electrical power. So how do we power everything in our homes with less energy? We use electrical transformers.

Transformers (not the movie) are used today all over the World to produce high-voltage pulses from a low-voltage supply. They transform low wattage into much higher wattage without any increase in supply demand.

A transformer is an induction coil consisting of two coils of insulated copper wire wound around a common iron core. One coil, called the primary winding, is made from relatively few (tens or hundreds) turns of coarse wire. The other coil, the secondary winding, typically consists of many (thousands) turns of fine wire. An electric current is passed through the primary, creating a magnetic field. Because of the common core, most of the primaryâ€™s magnetic field couples with the secondary winding. The primary behaves as an inductor, storing energy in the associated magnetic field. When the primary current is suddenly interrupted, the magnetic field rapidly collapses. This causes a high voltage pulse to be developed across the secondary terminals through electromagnetic induction. Because of the large number of turns in the secondary coil, the secondary voltage pulse is typically many thousands of volts.

Essentially what it does is use the 120 volts that the electrical power companies sells to you and transforms it in 10 to 100 times more electrical power. So if you were to install a transformer just before the 120 volts of power enters a electrical power hungry electric baseboard heater or fireplace, air conditioners, hot water tank, or microwave it would provide enough electrical power using 10 to 100 times less wattage. Your home heaters and appliances still get the electrical power they need but using a lot less electrical power from your electrical power company.

This technology has been available since the very first gas combustion vehicle rolled off of the assembly line. In fact this technology of transforming small amounts of electrical current into very high electrical current is essential to firing the spark plugs to ignite the fuel in all combustion engines. Without this technology the gasoline combustion vehicle would not exist today.

All gasoline powered vehicles have this technology. In a gasoline powered vehicle it is called an ignition coil. An ignition coil, which is also known as a spark coil is an induction coil (transformer) in an automobileâ€™s ignition system. It transforms the car batteryâ€™s 12 volts to thousands of volts. Very high voltage is needed to spark the spark plugs. A large ignition coil puts out about 20 kV, and a small one such as from a lawn mower puts out about 15 kV. kV is a unit of potential equal to a thousand volts. So 20 kV would equal to 20,000 volts. Which means a simple ignition coil transforms 12 volts into 20,000 volts or higher.

So what does an ignition coil or transformer do? It transforms low electrical current into very high electrical current. Anywhere from 10 times (10 fold) to several thousands times more electrical current. Can you image how this would will transform (pun intended) the entire global electrical power industry.

3 Comments for â€œA secret that it will transform the entire global electrical power industry.â€

Already getting emails saying that this article is a load of cow dung. One person who claims to be a lawyer from Dallas Texas is even threatening a class action lawsuit if I donâ€™t remove the article immediately. He claims the entire article is a fraud. To prove to you that this technology already exists and is doing exactly what I stated it does you only have to go to any Canadian Tire, Radio Shack, Walmart or any other store that sells Power Inverters. A Power Inverter is hooked up to a 12 volt car battery and transforms the 12 volts DC by a factor of 10 (10 fold) to 120 volts AC. Takes 12 VDC and steps it up to 120 VAC. Millions of people have bought these over the years and used them to power their household appliances, mp3 players, laptops etc in power outages or when they go on camping trips. Power Inverters transforms 12 volts into a much higher voltage of 120 volts and can be constructed to supply anywhere from 1 to 1000 (1 KW) watts. KW looks familiar? It is seen on every electrical power companyâ€™s electrical bill. Look at your electrical bill. You are being charged per KWh.

A transformer could be installed at the point of entry to your home or business and it could be used to provide all the electrical power you need using a very small amount of power from your electrical power company. You could go completely off the grid if you used a transformer with solar panels, wind turbines, earth battery cells or the totally free and unlimited radiant energy source harnessed by Nikola Teslaâ€™s radiant energy receiver.

Donâ€™t go rushing out and buying a power inverter thinking you can use it to save energy in your home. A power inverter can only be hooked up to a car battery which uses direct current or DC. You home uses alternating current or AC electrical power. Very different from DC batteries. Attempt plugging in an AC electrical power cord into a power inverter and you will cook the inverter, blow a fuse, start a fire or even electrocute yourself to death. You need an AC transformer to transform AC current to a much higher AC current.

The automobile ignition coil is a simple device â€” essentially a high-voltage transformer made up of two coils of wire. One coil of wire is called the primary coil. Wrapped around it is the secondary coil. The secondary coil normally has hundreds of times more turns of wire than the primary coil.

Current flows from the low voltage battery (12 volts) through the primary winding of the coil. The primary coilâ€™s current can be suddenly disrupted by the breaker points, or by a solid-state device in an electronic ignition.

The coil itself is an electromagnet inductor. The key to the coilâ€™s operation is what happens when the circuit is suddenly broken by the points. The magnetic field of the primary coil collapses rapidly. The secondary coil is engulfed by a powerful and changing magnetic field. This field induces a current in the coils â€” a very high-voltage current (up to 100,000 volts) because of the number of coils in the secondary winding. The secondary coil feeds this voltage to the distributor via a very well insulated, high-voltage wire.

In short, an ignition coil (inductor) transforms low voltage (12 volts of current) into a very high voltage current â€“ up to 100,000 volts. The energy output is many times greater than the input. An increase in energy output of 833233.33%