Friday, November 30, 2007

CBS news job posting on JournalismJobs.com:" CBS is expanding its coverage of the environment. We seek a talented reporter/host for Internet video broadcast. We are looking for smart, creative, hard working up and comers, who can bring great energy, creativity and a dash of humor to our coverage. A deep interest in the environment and sustainability issues will serve you well.

You are wicked smart, funny, irreverent and hip, oozing enthusiasm and creative energy. This position requires strong people, reporting, story telling and writing skills. Managing tight deadlines should be second nature. Knowledge of the enviro beat is a big plus, but not a requirement.

Responsibilities include reporting and hosting two to three news packages per week plus daily writing for our blog. You should be comfortable using a video camera and the Internet. Be prepared to see America. Heavy domestic travel."

No knowledge of the enviroment required, and must have story telling abilities.Pretty much sums up what the news agencys already have, but when you throw the part about being funny, hip, and irreverent, thats where the difficulties are encountered.

It's just darned hard to be cheerful when talking about the presumed destruction of the world by the hands of man.

------------------------->>>The extent of editorial intelligence at CBS News right now.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Full disclosure: I got this in an email. It's a fantastically simple explanation of the United States Tax system, and deserves to be read.And if nothing else, it is my first post ever involving alcohol on this blog.

Bar Stool Economics

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for allten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes,it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.The fifth would pay $1.The sixth would pay $3.The seventh would pay $7.The eighth would pay $12.The ninth would pay $18.The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy withthe arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Sinceyou are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce thecost of your daily beer by $20." Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes sothe first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How couldthey divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fairshare?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if theysubtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and thesixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the barowner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill byroughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amountseach should pay.

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first fourcontinued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the menbegan to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20,"declared the sixth man. Hepointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!" "Yeah, that's right,"exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfairthat he got ten times more than I!" "That's true!!" shouted theseventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? Thewealthy get all the breaks!" "Wait a minute," yelled the first fourmen in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the ninesat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay thebill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enoughmoney between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors,is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes getthe most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack themfor being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact,they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhatfriendlier.

Friday, November 23, 2007

Story: "...Yesterday, the strike of rail and subway workers that has crippled France for nine days was clearly crumbling, as workers began returning to work in large numbers and union branches conceded that support for the dispute is collapsing.

"We think a dynamic of return to work has begun," Julie Vion, a spokeswoman for France's state-owned railroad network, SNCF, said.

Union leaders began to concede defeat yesterday. "We have to face reality. Since yesterday's negotiations, things have changed. The strike is no longer the solution. The strike strategy is no longer winning,"...

Managers for SNCF announced yesterday that 42 out of 45 rail union committees have voted to abandon the national strike that has frozen the country's economy, and will return to work without delay."

Good to see socialsm take a hit, even in France.This Sarkozy President really seems to have it together, and having the political backbone to both start this reform, and successfully pull the first stage off, is something incredible.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Mark Steyn:"...But on this Thanksgiving the rest of the world ought to give thanks to American national sovereignty, too. When something terrible and destructive happens – a tsunami hits Indonesia, an earthquake devastates Pakistan – the United States can project itself anywhere on the planet within hours and start saving lives, setting up hospitals and restoring the water supply.

Aside from Britain and France, the Europeans cannot project power in any meaningful way anywhere. When they sign on to an enterprise they claim to believe in – shoring up Afghanistan's fledgling post-Taliban democracy – most of them send token forces under constrained rules of engagement that prevent them doing anything more than manning the photocopier back at the base.

If America were to follow the Europeans and maintain only shriveled attenuated residual military capacity, the world would very quickly be nastier and bloodier, and far more unstable. It's not just Americans and Iraqis and Afghans who owe a debt of thanks to the U.S. soldier but all the Europeans grown plump and prosperous in a globalized economy guaranteed by the most benign hegemon in history.

That said, Thanksgiving isn't about the big geopolitical picture, but about the blessings closer to home. Last week, the state of Oklahoma celebrated its centennial, accompanied by rousing performances of Rodgers and Hammerstein's eponymous anthem:

"We know we belong to the land

And the land we belong to is grand!"

Which isn't a bad theme song for the first Thanksgiving, either.

Three hundred and 86 years ago, the Pilgrims thanked God because there was a place for them in this land, and it was indeed grand. The land is grander today, and that, too, is remarkable: France has lurched from Second Empires to Fifth Republics struggling to devise a lasting constitutional settlement for the same smallish chunk of real estate, but the principles that united a baker's dozen of East Coast colonies were resilient enough to expand across a continent and halfway around the globe to Hawaii."

Absolute brilliance in this column. To often do we forget what the United States has done for the world.Or perhaps a better way to term it:What would this world be like without the United States?How would this world be different without a peaceful empire of liberty stretching from the foamy shores of the Atlantic to the shining coast of the Pacific, with Texas in the middle?