Friday, March 02, 2012

The never-catch-your-breath empire

Brian Becker is with the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition. In the video below, he's talking about the possible war on Iran.

Among other things, he's explaining how sanctions are an act of war.

My own personal belief is that Syria is on the war list ahead of Iran but that's my opinion.

I really can't believe that we can't breathe.

In 2006 and 2007, I was among those who took comfort in the fact that Bully Boy Bush left shortly.

I did not expect that America would finally find the most wonderful person to be president -- they hadn't prior -- but I thought we could breathe.

I thought all the killing and torture could be moved on from. Unlike David Swanson, I never thought that there would be any punishment for Bush & Co. The only way that would have happened is if Mike Gravel had won the nomination and the White House. (I supported Mike Gravel in the primaries. I also know him from 'back in the day.')

So I figured there would be a rush to put the Bush years firmly in the past. I wasn't thrilled about that, I believe in accountability; however, I could live with it.

Instead, I never get that day to relax and not live in fear that the country I live in, the government my taxes support, is about to declare war on yet more already suffering people, making their lives far worse.

March 2, 2012. Chaos and violence continue, protesters continue to be
attacked in Iraq, protesters continue to protest in Iraq, monthly totals for
February's violence are out, the White House hosts a veterans dinner, and
more.

Yesterday snapshot noted Wednesday's Senate
Veterans Affairs Committee hearing where the VA appeared as witnesses. Senator
Patty Murray is the Chair of the Committee, Richard Burr is the Ranking Member.
The topic was the White House's budget request for VA in Fiscal Year 2013. Many
topics were raised in relation to the budget. We'll note this exchange
initiated by the former Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Commitee, Senator
Daniel Akaka.

Senator Daniel Akaka: General Shinseki, as you know, we often face
challenges in treating our veterans who live in many rural and remote areas.
This is especially true in places like Alaska and Hawaii where you just can't
get to some places by jumping in a car and driving there. I know you're working
on an MOU [Memorandum Of Understanding] with the Indians to find solutions to
help provide services to our Native American veterans and I commend you and all
of you involved in these efforts. Mr. Secretary can I get your commitment to
possible ways of working with the Native Hawaiian health care systems and the
Native American veterans systems that provide services for Native Hawaiian
veterans who live in many of the rural parts of the state of
Hawaii.

Secretary Eric Shinseki: Senator, you have my assurance that, uh,
we will do our utmost to provide for any of our veterans
wherever they live -- the most rural and remote areas, the same access and
quality to health care and services as we provide to someone living in a more
urban area. There is a challenge to that but we are not insensitive to that
challenge and we're working hard to provide VA provided services and where we
can't to make arrangements -- if quality services exist in those areas marking
arrangements for veterans to be able to participate in those local
opportunities. We are, I think you know, working and have been for some time on
signing an MOU with Indian Health Service so that wherever they have facilities
and we have vested interests that a veteran -- an eligible veteran -- going to
an Indian Health Service facility will be covered by VA's payments. We're in
stages of trying to bring that MOU to conclusion. We intend to do that. And
where tribes approach us prior to the signing of the MOU and want to establish,
from Tribal Nation with VA, a direct relationship because they have a medical
facility and would like us to provide the same coverage, we're willing to do
that. But that would be on a case-by-case basis.

Senator Daniel Akaka: Thank you. Secretary Shinseki, staffing
shortages continue to be a problem although there's been some progress. But
some clinics are seeing staffing levels below 50% causing excessive waiting time
for veterans that need care. I understand this is an issue you've been working
on. As you know the number of veterans needing services is growing yearly and
it shows that you have been making progress. Can you provide an update on the
Department's progress to address staffing levels?

Dr. Robert Petzel: Uh, Mr. Secretary, thank you;
Senator Akaka, thank you for the question. The -- uh -- We've addressed mental
-- We've talked about mental health earlier and the efforts we're making to try
and assess whether there's adequate staffing there. I think you're probably
talking about primary care, which is our largest out patient clinic operation.
We treat 5 -- 4.2 million veterans in our primary care system and it accounts
for the lion's share of our budget expenditures. We assessed staffing three
years ago when we began to implement a Patient Aligned Care team or PAC program
and have done it again recently. And we're finding that we're now able to bring
up the support staffing and the physician staffing to reasonable levels
associated with the standards around the country. I would like to take off
record -- offline -- any information you have about specific places where
there's a 50% vacancy rate. I'm not aware that we have this around the
country. So I would be delighted to meet and talk with your staff and find out
where these areas might be so that we can address them
specifically.

Senator Daniel Akaka: My time has expired but, Secretary Shinseki,
as we face budget constraints, we must all work to improve our efficiency and
redouble efforts to look for ways to get the most from our budgeted resources.
My question to you is can you talk about any steps you are taking to improve the
acquisition process at VA and any efficiencies you've been able to realize in
this area?

Secretary Eric Shinseki: Senator, I would tell you that, uh, we
have been working for several years now on restructuring our acquisition
business practices. Three years ago, acquisition was spread throughout the
organization. Now it's consolidated in two centers. One comes directly under
Dr. Petzel and that's where all medical acquistions -- gloves, masks, aprons --
we ought to be able to leverage that into a bulk purchase and get a good price
on those kinds of things. For everything we have an Office of Acqusition,
Logistics and Construction and we have a director who heads both offices then
come up to my level to the deputy secretary as part of our monthly
oversight review process.

When I think of veterans in "rural" areas, I think of them in southern
states or in Michigan which is densley populated in and around Detroit but much
more sparsely populated throughout the rest of the state. I also think of
Alaska, Montana and other states. I never consider Hawaii rural but of course
it is. "Remote and rural" really drives that home. Senator Akaka's word choice
really drove the point home. He also asked about staffing and a community
member (Troy) had asked if the empty medical positions at VA were raised by any
senator when discussing the budget on Wednesday? Ranking Member Richard Burr
raised that issue.

Ranking Member Richard Burr: Since the
Chair just asked about mental health, let me just ask if my information is
correct. In December, VA polled their facilities and they found that there were
15,000 open mental health positions. Is that accurate? Dr.
Petzel?

Secretary Eric Shinseki: Let me turn to Dr. Petzel.

Dr.
Robert Petzel: Uh, could you repeat that number, Senator Burr.Ranking Member
Richard Burr: In December of 2011, the VA polled their facilites and found there
were 15,000 mental health slots that were unfilled meaning --

Dr. Robert
Petzel: Our of 20,500, that's true.

There were many important questions raised in the hearing. On Iraqi
violence, Mohammad Akef Jamal (Gulf News) raises
an interesting one today about the February 23rd attacks across Iraq, "The
spokesman of the Ministry of Interior announced that the ministry possesses
grave and important information regarding the blasts. He then proceeded to
threaten all those who have carried out the terrorist operations -- but if the
ministry was truly in possession of information, why are the culprits still at
large? " Don't expect it to get answered anytime soon but it is an important
question. AKE's John Drakeappeared Wedensday on New Zealand's Radio
Live (link is audio) to dicuss the ongoing violence. Excerpt:

James Coleman: John Drake is an Iraq intelligence analyst at AKE
Intelligence -- an organization offering research and analysis on security risks
around the globe. He joins us from London. John, good evening to
you.

John Drake: Good evening and good morning.

James Coleman: So Baghdad is the focus of much of the violence.
What has triggered the increase in aggression in the capitol?

John Drake: Well it's the focal point of all the main political
organizations in Iraq. It's the seat of government, it's where a lot of the
Iraqi and international media are based. So by conducting attacks in Baghdad,
it often gives the militant groups additional attention, it raises the profile
of their activies. It generates an audience for whatever political agenda
they're trying to push. That's one of the main reasons. It's also, wherever you
get a large amount of people in a large urban area that is often where you will
get the great concentration of violence. Larger cities tend to see more
crimes. It's often very similar when it comes to terrorism as
well.

James Coleman :Mosul's been unusually quiet. Is there any
indications that militants are looking elsewhere?

John Drake: That could be the case. Mosul is normally one of the
most violent parts of the country. Over the course of last year, it saw an
average of about one to two attacks a day. Over the last few weeks, it's been
down to about two or three attacks a week. Now while the Iraqi authorities did
indicate this was maybe due to some of their recent counter-insurgency
operations in the city, the operations that they've been initiating haven't been
more intense than normal and they haven't really been netting more militants
than normal either. So there are two concerns. One is that militants may be
looking across the border to Syria. They may be crossing the border to sell
weaponry or even equipment and medicine or anything that they could put on the
black market to raise finances for their operation. They may also be sending
fighter across the border into Syria to engage in unrest and revolution there.
They may be trying to infilitrate the main opposition organizations to Syrian
President Basher Assad. They may be responsible for conducting some of the
recent terrorist attacks in the country. However after the attacks -- the series
of attacks in central Iraq a few days ago, it's obvious that they haven't all
gone across the border. There's still a lot of them still in Iraq and looking to
conduct attacks in the center of the country.

Staying with violence, AGI reports 2 Baghdad bombings resulted
in 6 deaths and ten people injured today while Mohammed Ameer and Peter Graff
(Reuters) report that Iraqi
governmental ministries have released the February death toll figures asserting
that 151 people died in February. They note these official numbers may be low
and that "[o]ther sources, such as Iraq Body Count, a group which compiles data
from media reports, give higher figures."

So let's look at how many we noticed the media reporting.

February 1st 2 were reported dead and eleven
injured; February 2nd 4 were reported dead and one
injured; February 3rd 3 were reported dead and eight
injured; February 4th 5 were reported dead and three
injured; February 5th 1 was reported dead and 5 injured;
February 6th 1 was reported dead and twenty-two
injured; February 7th 4 were reported dead and sixteen
injured; February 8th no reported deaths; February 9th 2 were reported dead 3 injured; February 10th 1 death was reported (we don't
include the border clashes with Turkey when we do these counts); February 11th none reported dead or wounded; February 12th 2 were reported dead and twelve
injured; February 13th 3 were reported dead and seven
injured; February 14th 9 were reported dead and
twenty-seven injured; February 15th 4 were reported death and four
injured; February 16th 1 was reported dead and eight
injured; February 17th 5 were reported dead and one
injured; February 18th no one was reported dead and none
injured, February 19th 40 and thirty-three; February 20th zero were reported dead or wounded;
February 21st zero were reported dead or wounded;
February 22nd zero were reported dead or wounded;
February 23rd 70 were reported dead [well over] a
hundred wounded [these were the bombs across Iraq and once the wounded reached
100 the press largely stopped counting]; February 24th 1 dead and three injured; February 25th zero were reported dead or wounded;
February 26th 2 were reported dead and seven
injured; February 27th one person was reported wounded; February 28th 8 were reported dead, twelve
injured; and February 29th 11 were reported dead and
twenty-six injured. Check my math, that should be 175 dead and 329 injured.
That's just the ones we noted and I surely missed many. In addition, not all
deaths are covered by the media -- true throughout the war and only more so now.

At least 53 people were killed and
245 injured in #Iraq violence last
week.

His totals are 135 dead and 422 injured. Iraq Body Count probably keeps the best records of those
monitoring deaths covered by the media and they counted 248 civilian deaths in Iraq for the month of
February.

Zooming in on violence to violence against protesters. Mahmoud al-Hassani
al-Sarkh is a religious leader whose offices were attacked around February 19th
when Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani's were being attacked.Nasiriyah News
Network reports that approximately 100 Sarkhi supporters protested
yesterday in Nasiriyah as they called for his office to be reopened. Hassan
Sahlani (Nasiriyah News Network)
adds that a delegation from the protesters met with the governor and the
province's police chief.Violence also took place today in Nasiriyah. While
Thursday's demonstration went well Alsumaria TV reports when the same supporters of
religious authority Mahmoud al-Hassani Sarkhi demonstrated in public today, they
were run off by riot police using water hoses.

And sadly, if that's all that happened, it may have been the least response
to protesters by any portion of the Iraqi government.

In the KRG,
demonstrators gathered on February 17th and they numbered in excess of 250. They
report to Human Rights Watch that they were beaten, threatened and intimidated.
Journalist attempting to cover the December 17th action were also attacked:
"They confiscated the camera of Rahman Gharib, coordinator for the local press
freedom group Metro Center to Defend Journalists, and beat him on the head and
leg after he took some photographs, Gharib and witnesses told Human Rights
Watch. The Metro Center has documented numerous abuses against Kurdish
journalists, including more than 200 cases of attacks and harassment during
the protests in Sulaimaniya between February and May, 2011."

In Baghdad,
a number of methods were used to suppress turnout. From the report:

Members of several protest groups told Human Rights
Watch that they attempted to demonstrate in Tahrir Square on February 25, the
anniversary of Baghdad's 2011 "Day of Anger," when thousands gathered in the
square to protest widespread corruption and demand greater civil and political
rights. During nationwide demonstrations on that day a year earlier, security
forces killed at least 12 protesters across the country and injured more than
100. Human Rights Watch also saw Baghdad security forces beat unarmed
journalists and protesters, smashing cameras and confiscating memory
cards.On February 25, 2012, security
forces in Baghdad again attempted to stop protesters from reaching Tahrir
Square, though with different methods. Several demonstrators told Human Rights
Watch that security forces blocked many roads approaching Tahrir Square, at
times saying the roads were blocked because a car bomb that had gone off in the
vicinity, although protesters said local merchants reported hearing no
explosions and Iraqi authorities released no specific information to the
media.Security forces told also told
protesters walking toward Tahrir Square that they had intelligence indicating
that "many terrorists" were in the square and 11 bombs had been placed in the
area, and that security forces "could not guarantee the safety of protesters."
Human Rights Watch witnessed security forces using similar explanations to
prevent journalists and protesters from going to Tahrir Square many times
between March and December 2011.Some
of the protesters who reached Tahrir Square said they did not enter the square
because the show of force by security forces frightened them. According to
observers, the forces numbered between 600 and 1,000 armed personnel in and
around Tahrir Square, with more amassed on side streets.As protesters approached the multiple checkpoints
surrounding Tahrir Square set up that morning, security forces informed them
that they had a long list of protesters whom they had orders to arrest and that
they would check this list against the identification cards of anyone wishing to
pass through. A young activist who did not want his name used for fear of
government reprisal told Human Rights Watch that one smiling soldier told him
and other protesters, "We may have your name. Why don't you step forward and see
if you get arrested?"Another activist
said that an officer told protesters that even people with names "similar" to
those on the list would be arrested."From the way he said it, I thought he might arrest me
no matter what my name was, so we left," he said.One demonstrator, who said he was intimidated and did
not try to pass the police checkpoints, said: "I just stood monitoring, outside
Tahrir Square. No one at all was allowed to take photos or use their phones.
There were so many members of the army; they were standing every half meter in
the square with their sticks."

And Tim
Arango and the New York Times? They
didn't report on any of the above. Iraqi reporters were trying to cover the
Baghdad demonstration and Human Rights Watch notes that:

Journalists told Human Rights Watch that security
forces prevented them from covering the demonstration by not allowing them to
enter the square with photographic equipment, voice recorders, mobile phones,
and even pens. One Iraqi news agency reported that security forces briefly
detained journalists for "violating the rules of demonstration, entering banned
areas and trying to provoke the public." Human Rights Watch has observed
security forces interfering with journalists at work at more than 20
demonstrations at Tahrir Square during the past year.Iraq's constitution guarantees "freedom of
assembly and peaceful demonstration."As a state party to the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Iraq is obligated to protect the rights
to life and security of the person, and the rights to freedom of expression,
association, and peaceful assembly. In May, the Council of Ministers approved a
draft "Law on the Freedom of Expression of Opinion, Assembly, and Peaceful
Demonstration," which authorizes officials to restrict freedom of assembly to
protect "the public interest" and in the interest of "general order or public
morals," vague criteria that the law does not define further. The draft law is
awaiting approval by parliament.

The Committee to Protect
Journalists rated Iraq the worst country in its
"impunity index" for last
year, which measures how a national legal system does, or does not, protect
reporters. Five reporters were killed across the country in 2011 and 150 have
been killed there since 2003. Last year, 26 journalists were detained by the
authorities for their work. The CPJ says that there has not yet been a
conviction in any of those cases.

In spite of the attacks and threats, Jane Arraf
(Al Jazeera, Christian Science Monitor) Tweets that protests took place
in Baghdad today:

From the current occupation to a potential new one, on this week's. Black Agenda
Radio, hosted by Glen Ford and Nellie Bailey, (airs each Monday
at 4:00 pm EST on the Progressive Radio
Network), Glen Ford discussed Syria with international law expert
Francis A. Boyle. Excerpt.

Glen Ford: The US and its allies insist that Syria doesn't have the
right to protect itself. Now about one-third of the deaths in this internal
conflict have already been Syrian soldiers and policemen. Clearly, it is an
armed conflict.

Francis A. Boyle: Obviously. My guess is like what happened in
Libya there was a spontaneous protest and demonstrations by people living there
against the Assad government. That doesn't surprise me at all. But it was
quickly hijacked and has been used as a pretext to promote an attempt to
overthrow the Assad government and, if that doesn't work, to produce civil was
in Syria that would neutralize Syria and its long standing refusal to succumb to
Israel's demands and the Zionist demands that they effectively give up the Golan
Heights. And also to crack Syria up into its ethnic components, which it does
have along the lines of what they've already done to Afghanistan, Iraq,
Yugoslavia and Libya as well. So the same thing could very easily happen to
Syria and it would simply serve the interests of Israel, the United States,
France -- the former colonial power there. It's a joke and a fraud to say that
France is the least bit interested in human rights in Syria. And also Turkey --
the other former colonial power in Syria. And, again, it's a joke and a fraud to
say that Turkey's the least bit interested in human rights in Syria --
especially after what's it's done to its -- what it's still doing to its own
Kurdish people in Turkey itself and also in northern Iraq. So you really can't
take these colonial-imperial powers seriously when they shed crocodile tears for
human rights.

Glen Ford: France is demanding a humanitarian corridor in Syria.
But of course we remember that NATO rejected the idea of a humanitarian corridor
in Libya when the African Union proposed one.

Francis A. Boyle: Look at the proposal by the African Union which
is the appropriate regional organization, set up under Chapter 8 of the United
Nations Charter to deal with Africa. And they had a very comprehensive peace
proposal there for Libya and it was completely brushed aside and indeed stymied
at the Security Council and in the General Assembly. So the colonial-imperial
powers in NATO and the United States paid absolutely no attention to the African
Union. This is all eyewash that they're concerned about human rights. Have any
of them lifted one finger at all to help the Palestinians? Especially the

1.5 million Palestinians now who are being subjected to slow motion
genocide in Gaza? Of course not. So it's just preposterous. This is all
propaganda here in the United States that I don't think really deceives anybody
over there in the region about what's really going on.

Glen Ford: It seems to many of us that Syria has been forced to
battle block by block in certain cities lest the West declare some area, some
city, some border area, some sliver of land in Syria to be a kind of liberated
territory that must be protected by the West.

Francis A. Boyle: Well they did the same thing in Libya in
Benghazi, right? Remember Reagan tried to do the same thing in Nicaragua with
the Contras and set up some kind of free zone and a liberated government that
could then ask for military intervention? That is correct. So this is pretty
much par for the course for these colonial-imperial powers.
Right.

Glen Ford: So as an expert on international law, is Syria within
its rights to defend its control over all of its territory?

Francis A. Boyle: Well I'm not justifying any human rights
violations by Syria -- one way or the other. But certainly it seems to me that
what is going on here is an organized attempt to overthrow the legitimate
government of Syria that is being coordinated by the United States, France,
Turkey, Qatar -- a dictatorship -- and by Saudi Arabia -- another dictatorship.
And it appears support coming from Israel and Iraq and other forces under the
control of Western intelligence agencies such as al Qaeda. For example, last
week the Financial Times reported that all of these al Qaeda fighters
-- after they did the dirty work in Libya are now moving over to mobilize
against Syria. Also they are mobilizing now in Jordan, as we speak. The
government does have a right to keep itself in power. You know, who gives Obama
the right to say that the government in Syria should step down? None. But they
don't really care. There has been no effort made at all by the United States,
any of these imperial powers or by the United Nations or by the League of Arab
States to achieve a peaceful resolution of this dispute as required by the terms
of the United Nations Charter under Chapter Six -- which is what they should
have done before moving to Chapter Seven enforcement measures. No effort at all
has been made to produce a peaceful resolution of this matter and that's exactly
what happened in Libya -- no effort at all was made. So I think that indicates
just an absence of good faith at and, at this point, they have no intention of a
peaceful resolution of this dispute. Their objective, their intention is to
overthrow the Assad government, put in a stooge puppet if possible that will be
under the control of the United States, France and at the end of the day sign
some type of bogus peace treaty with Israel that will give them the control of
the Golan Heights.

President Obama, First Lady Michelle Obama, Vice President Joe
Biden and Dr Jill Biden tonight welcomed a group of true American heroes to the
White House. "A Nation's Gratitude: Honoring those who served in Operation Iraqi
Freedom and Operation New Dawn" was a formal dinner that paid tribute to
our Iraq veterans and marked the end of the war.

More than 100 service members and their guests were in attendance,
and the invitees included men and women in uniform from all ranks, each U.S.
state and territory, and every branch of the Armed Forces. Together,
they represented the million American troops who served in Iraq, and they also
represented what Vice President Joe Biden called the finest generation of
warriors in all of history.

In his remarks, the President welcomed the veterans home, praised
their bravery and dedication to their mission, and thanked them on behalf of
more than 300 million Americans:

Tonight, what we can do is convey what you've meant to the rest of
us. Because through the dust and the din and the fog of war, the glory of your
service always shone through. In your noble example, we see the virtues and the
values that sustain America, that keep this country great.

You taught us about duty. Blessed to live in the land of the free,
you could have opted for an easier path. But you know that freedom is not
free. And so you volunteered and you stepped forward, and you raised your hand
and you took an oath -- to protect and defend; to serve a cause greater than
yourself, knowing, in a time of war, you could be sent into harm's
way.

You taught us about resolve. Invasion turned to insurgency and then
sectarian strife. But you persevered, tour after tour, year after year. Indeed,
we're mindful that even as we gather here, Iraq veterans continue to risk their
lives in Afghanistan, and our prayers are with them all
tonight.

In one of our nation's longest wars, you wrote one of the most
extraordinary chapters in American military history. Now the Iraqi people have a
chance to forge their own destiny, and every one of you who served there can
take pride in knowing you gave the Iraqis this opportunity; that you succeeded
in your mission.