|delete=#{{delete}} very short and random article. Although it has been edited several times recently, it seems to consist of the 2006 formula "find a funny title, add funny pics, and fill out the text with randumbo". --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:27, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.

If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:

Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.

Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.

Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.

To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.

If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions.This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty.Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept.You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.

Delete. very short and random article. Although it has been edited several times recently, it seems to consist of the 2006 formula "find a funny title, add funny pics, and fill out the text with randumbo". --Mn-z 11:27, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. Aleister 14:20 15-2-'13

Delete (1)

Delete. and redirect to Glenn Beck. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --Mn-z 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny. Some funny stuff remains and I would like to see it merged into Glenn Beck, as "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. SpıkeѦ14:31 15-Feb-13

Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...Aleister minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.

I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. SpıkeѦ14:41 15-Feb-13

I strike part of my earlier reply. Glenn Beck was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. SpıkeѦ16:06 15-Feb-13

I believe I am the Admin to whom Mnbvcxz refers. The cases where I didn't realize something was a joke are numerous and legend. In the case I was thinking about, I patrolled an edit to this page and reported it in passing to Sannse without viewing the page as a whole. Although it does air grievances with Wikia and risks attracting trolling by resentful users and perhaps from the Fork, it is seriously funny. We ought to have room for a page imitating legalism, but with a litany not to "publish, copy, display, distribute, [or] put mayonnaise on"--especially when it already has a disclaimer at the start that it's not the real thing. SpıkeѦ19:04 14-Feb-13

No, not by name; but some of the material seems to be motivated by real-world gripes. SpıkeѦ16:07 15-Feb-13

Keep. Too funny to let die. Besides, if you actually read it, or even scan it, you will realize it isn't the real thing, besides there's a disclaimer at the top pointing to the real thing. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 07:05, February 15, 2013 (UTC)

Delete (1)

Delete. and soft redirect to Wikia's real terms of use. This fake page has confused even an admin, and isn't that funny. --Mn-z 18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Picked this one up on ICU, however it has existed since before 2009 so is too old for ICU. It is mostly made up of lists and not particularly amusing lists at that. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 08:19, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Delete. Smallish, typographically ugly article presses two chronic Spike hot-buttons: (1) The title is a pun, and the reader has to already know the pun to enjoy the article; (2) The page is an Anon magnet, inviting grade-school humor from Anons who cannot do better than gay-bashing and puns. I have nothing against gay-bashing, if done with cleverness, but this is not it; and then again, if you were to write it, why would you misplace it here? SpıkeѦ18:41 13-Feb-13

Delete. an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --Mn-z 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)