The Catch-22 of Conservation: Indigenous Peoples, Biologists, and Cultural Change

Abstract

Resurgent protectionists advocate a return to strict nature protection characterized by excluding most people from ecologically fragile areas. Certain groups of indigenous residents, namely those with low population densities, simple technologies, and subsistence economies, are seen as conservation friendly, but groups who are experiencing demographic growth, using Western technologies, and producing for the market are perceived as incompatible with biodiversity conservation. Using insights from common property theory as well as ethnographic observations of the Huaorani Indians of Ecuador, I illustrate how such assumptions constitute a “conservation Catch-22” in which cultural conditions deemed compatible with biodiversity conservation are precisely those from which we would not predict conservationist practices to emerge. Romanticized conditions deemed harmonious with nature lack the incentives necessary for people to develop conservationist practices. Conservation is not a state of being, but a social process inextricably linked to social and political institutions influencing resource management.

Holt, F. L., Bilsborrow, R. E., and Oña, A. I. (2004). Demography, Household Economics, and Land and Resource Use of Five Indigenous Populations in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon: A Summary of Ethnographic Research. Occasional Paper, Carolina Population Center. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar

Lu, F. E. (1999). Changes in Subsistence Patterns and Resource Use of the Huaorani Indians in the Ecuadorian Amazon, PhD Dissertation, Curriculum in Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

McCay, B. J., and Acheson, J. M. (1987). The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar

McKean, M. A. (1996). Common property: What is it good for, and what makes it work? Forests, Trees and People Programme, Phase II Working Papers. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar

Oates, J. F. (1999). Myth and Reality in the Rain Forest: How Conservation Strategies are Failing in West Africa, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Rival, L. M. (1992). Social Transformations and the Impact of Formal Schooling on the Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador, PhD Dissertation, London School of Economics, University of London, London.Google Scholar