Thursday, August 9, 2012

In a surprising turn, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave
a signal Thursday in London that could lead to leniency for the feminist punk
protest outfit known as Pussy Riot.

If you haven't been following the Pussy Riot story, you can
get caught up with this post I wrote this week for PolicyMic.In short, the group bills themselves as a
feminist punk collective; they gained national stature in Russia during the
past year thanks to their rapid fire public performances of songs ripping into
the Putin regime, which were then widely viewed on YouTube and other social
media sites.In February, Pussy Riot
stormed into Moscow's Christ the Savior cathedral to perform a “punk prayer”
where they implored the Virgin Mary to “drive Putin out!”Two weeks later, three of Pussy Riot's
members: Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, Yekaterina
Samutsevich and Maria Alyokhina, were arrested and charged with what amounts to
a religious hate crime that could land them seven years in prison.

It has been widely believed that
the harsh legal charges were directed from the very top, Putin himself, who
took the performance, which also attacked the close links between the Putin
government and Russian Orthodox Church, as a personal insult and that the
prosecution of Pussy Riot has taken on the dimensions of a personal
vendetta.But Putin's comments Thursday,
as reported by Reuters, could be a sign that he is softening his stance.

Saying that there was “nothing good” about the performance,
Putin added: "Nonetheless, I don't think that
they should be judged so harshly for this … I hope the court will come out with
the right decision, a well-founded one.” In Putinland, that would seem to be a
none-to-subtle signal to the courts not to impose the maximum seven year sentence
on the three women.That is the way that
Pussy Riot defense attorney Nikolai Polozov is interpreting the comments. “Given the significance of such signals, we can
expect some softening of the prosecution's position,” he said.

Putin's position could be the
result of growing international pressure over the prosecution of Pussy Riot,
which is seen as being largely political.Their cause has been taken up by groups like Human Rights Watch and
Amnesty International, which declaredTolokonnikova, Samutsevich and Alyokhina “prisoners of conscience”, to
artists like Sting and the Red Hot Chili Peppers, to protesters from St.
Petersburg to Washington DC, where several dozen DC area “punks” gathered
outside the Russian embassy this week.Lawyer Polozov speculated that the signal from Putin might be to calm
foreign investors in Russia over fears of politically-motivated prosecutions.

But Polozov is also sanguine about
his clients' prospects, saying on Twitter: “to tell the truth, I don't believe
Putin. If the signal gets through and the court reacts, OK, but if not we will
fight on.”

Mission Statement

Why A World View? Because I was frustrated by the lack of international news coverage in the American press. Sadly, foreign events usually only make the news when there’s a war or natural disaster someplace. But the world is more interconnected than ever, what happens on the other side of the globe can have a direct affect on your life. So I started this site to cover some of these stories missed by the mainstream media, and to provide analysis and context to others. And my goal is to do it in a way that you don’t feel like you need a PhD degree to understand what’s going on.