The Life of Calvin Coolidge

In our age of Progressivism run amuck and unbridled, it has become commonplace among many Americans to yearn for the statesmen of the founding period, or perhaps to the century that followed. For such inspiration, it is rare for principled conservatives to look more recently, and perhaps justifiably so.

Yet one president does stand in a forgotten chapter of the early Twentieth Century as a principled model for our consideration. To foreshadow the highly anticipated biography by Amity Shlaes on Calvin Coolidge (to be published this summer) we invite you to enjoy this stirring examination1 of Coolidge’s character and life by a cherished member of the George Wythe University faculty, Dr. Michael Platt.

Part I

by Michael Platt, PhD

In 1928, had President Calvin Coolidge chosen to run for reelection, the American people would surely have chosen him again, and thus he would have served as President into early 1933. What the consequences of that choice would have been, for America and the world, is hard to say. Mr. Coolidge did not choose to run, he was not elected, he did not serve. Instead, he chose to do other things, among them to write his Autobiography.2

I. The book is not readily available today and is not much read, yet it is a good book, a good book for statesmen and citizens, ladies and gentlemen, women and men, and also girls and boys to read.

Just as hay in a full barn in September and jam in the pantry are the concentrates of all the sun, water, and the work of the summer, so the sentences that make up Coolidge’s Autobiography are the fruits of a good life.

II. About seven score years ago, Calvin Coolidge came into the world. The day of his birth was already a holiday. He was born on the Fourth of July in 1872. For the rest of his life, the annual joyous return of the nation’s birthday coincided with his own. Thus, from childhood, Calvin Coolidge’s happiness was absorbed in something greater than himself, and so it was to be his whole life long; his happiness, and his sorrow, served something greater, in truth a fair portion of the good.

Coolidge was born in Plymouth Notch in the middle of Vermont. Then and now, the Notch lies in a high valley surrounded by six low mountains with two entrances. Streams rush strong and cool down the defiles, green meadows slope up to dark forests, and snows drift high. There the lights are turned off early, the nights are dark, and over all the peaks there is peace. A thousand free men could hold the Notch against an army.

Coolidge found it a clean place and a place for clean living. “While I can think of many pleasures we did not have, and many niceties of culture with which we were unfamiliar, yet if I had the power to order my life anew I would not dare to change that period of it. If it did not afford me the best that there was, it abundantly provided the best that there was for me.” Reading that, one does not know which is more worthy, Coolidge’s insight or his gratitude.

Like most of America then, Plymouth was a community of farmers. Work was scheduled by nature; the sun directed the day and presided over the seasons. Farm labor was long, difficult, regular, and various.3 It filled life with things worth doing, it supported families, and it made them more family; members labored together, within sight of each other, or within range of a story at supper; and parents worked to pass on the blessings of this life to their children. In this community of families, Calvin’s father was prominent. Thrift and industry brought him prosperity. There was no skill, in carpentry, masonry, farming, handling horses, and a hundred ancillary arts, that he did not possess. Trust in his fellow man, forbearance of ills, and service to others brought him the respect of his fellow townspeople, and with that their votes, for Vermont was then a state of self-governing towns and even self-governing school districts.

Young Coolidge learned self-government by watching, by listening, and by doing. He watched his father and others, he listened to their discussions, and practiced all he beheld: industry in work and in studies, thrift in his own economic enterprises, and civil sagacity much later. Liberty was, for his elders and for him, at once something you must strive to get for yourself, by industry and thrift, and something that as a father, a citizen, a Selectman, or Representative you should support in others. The right to that Liberty is best protected by all living it, and by some gaining the votes of the others to office, so that the consent and the virtue of the people are kept together.

As important was the love of his mother, who died when he was twelve, whose grave he visited in the night, and who, whenever he thought of her, was with him. “Whatever was grand and beautiful in form and color attracted her.” Also important was the loving support of his stepmother. Thinking of her, Coolidge writes, “I am convinced that the good predominates and that it is constantly all about us, ready for our service if only we will accept it.”

III. Coolidge was very grateful for the schooling he received. What he learned at home fit with what he learned in the fields; both fit with what he learned in the general store, in the town meeting and in the church; and all this in turn fit with what he learned when he went away to Black River Academy, thirteen walking miles from home in Ludlow. There teachers were hired for what they knew, students advanced by their achievements, and the chance to learn was valued as a privilege. Had Coolidge gone no further than Black River, he would have gone forth to live a good life. It is a good school of which you can say that.

Yet there was more in store for this man and a college was the way to it. At Amherst, Coolidge first discovered what a man might be, but not right off. Up until his junior year, Coolidge was a fair, but not a fine student, hardworking and faithful, but nothing special. He felt it and thought of withdrawing. He yearned for something, he didn’t know quite what, and was weary, even despondent, but his father counseled him to return. He did and found what he wanted in the classes of Prof. Charles E. Garman. From the spring of Junior all the way through Senior year, Garman taught psychology, which meant the soul, and philosophy, which meant the good. Witherspoon at Princeton taught a similar course to James Madison, but Garman was probably more important to Coolidge. In Garman’s classes students learned that they could reason on their own. Of course, geometry, especially Euclid, can do that, and has done it for many, including Lincoln, but Garman taught students that they could reason about life. Of Garman, you might say he made boys into men, or that he made men into human beings, truly rational animals.

This fine teacher valued intellectual virtue as much as true opinion; not all students appreciated this, certainly not at the beginning of the course, when in place of the answers they expected, they encountered questions, when in place of a textbook, they met pamphlets. With his own salary Garman printed these up, swore the students to secrecy, and asked each to think about the matters in them, reason about them, at first alone in their essays, which Garman commented on copiously, and then together in class; only after that did Garman say something about his answer. Garman began with matter and the self, showed the students that materialism cannot account for the materialist, emphasized choices, thus proceeded to ethics, and from ethics on to politics. Students such as Calvin Coolidge came away convinced that they could know truth, were bound to revere Truth’s God, and placed on earth to serve the good.

Read some of Garman’s pamphlets and the testimonials of his students and you will see why William James called him the best teacher in America.5 “He was constantly reminding us that the spirit was willing but the flesh was strong, but that nevertheless, if we would continue steadfastly to think on these things we would be changed from glory to glory through increasing intellectual and moral power. He was right,” testifies Coolidge. The four pages on his teacher in his Autobiography are just the kind of appreciation that a true teacher hopes to deserve, not clapping immediately, or even esteem into the next term, but years after, abiding gratitude, for setting one on the right path, one that leads to a good life and that is, when you consider it, the beginning of that good life. For the rest of his life, Coolidge kept a collection of Garman’s pamphlets by his bedside.5

Sent into the world by that teacher, Coolidge chose law to serve others. The transition from accomplished Senior to unregarded beginner is often painful, but not for Coolidge. It was the happiest of his life. “I was full of the joy of doing something in the world.” There is no greater pleasure than finally to be doing what you have prepared for and seeing that you are doing it well. As practiced then, the law was learned, orderly, and responsible. It tended to encourage justice, its usages trained reason, and its ways instilled moderation in the people. No self-hawking advertisements, no calling cards at accident scenes, and no predatory charges by the minute. The profession was respected and its general standing elevated those in it who were most trusted. Coolidge was one, and, as Hamilton had predicted, trust for the good lawyer helped to elect him to a series of political offices. On the way he met his beloved Grace. “We thought we were made for each other. For almost a quarter of a century she has borne with my infirmities, and I have rejoiced in her graces.” By saying no more, Coolidge makes us wonder if there has been a finer lady in our White House.

Now as it happened, while Governor of Massachusetts, Coolidge was faced with a strike by the police of the city of Boston. No great defender of the Res Publica of old Rome faced down a mutineering legion with firmer justice. What he ordered put down rebellion in Boston and what he telegraphed to Gompers made him known in the nation. “There is no right to strike against the public safety by any body, any time, any where.” In this aphorism the people recognized one of the cornerstones of their self-governing Liberty. And in the aphorist, they recognized a pillar they might trust with greater weight. Coolidge’s firmness, in deed and in word, made him Vice President.

It is a remarkable fact that since Lincoln many of the best presidents have come to the Presidency through the death of their predecessor: Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, and Harry Truman. The Vice-Presidency is a Platonic notion. It asks of the political man, often a most ambitious type and always an active one, whether he is willing to spend his time sitting still and put the remunerated leisure provided by the people to good use. Coolidge, as you can see from his account, passed this test of leisure well.

Everyone knows how the death of Harding then made Coolidge President, how his own father administered the oath in the night in Plymouth, how he let impartial justice remove the scandal surrounding the dead executive, and how in appreciation, the people elected him in his own right. The other events of his administration are less well known, and Coolidge says little of them. The most well known, the remarkable prosperity of the nation, achieved through reduction of the national debt and the Mellon tax cuts, Coolidge does not mention, probably because it was everywhere obvious to most everyone.

One way to begin to appreciate these achievements, despite the calumny of certain historians and the neglect of others,6 is by reading Coolidge’s speeches.7 Reading them you never feel uncertain what he thought. You know that he could think, that he alone wrote them, and that he did so for others. Thus, whatever the topic or the audience, Coolidge leads his fellow citizens to the fraternal amity that justice and common sense promote.

There is a reason why Coolidge's Autobiography says little about the particular acts of his presidency, reveals none of his secrets, and thus disappoints some historians. The good statesman focuses all his mind on his acts and their results, not on how to make it come out right in the memoirs. In place of such details Coolidge devotes a chapter to the general precepts of executive prudence, a warning of how encroachments upon the appointive power will lead to bureaucratic despotism, and how to govern the day.

The restless contemporary wits who criticized Coolidge for napping after lunch do not appreciate how happy a land may be when presided over by a man who can nap. The wisdom of the Framers made our chief executive a president, not a leader. It is a Macbeth who is sleepless and it is a great napper, such as Churchill, whom you can count on to win great wars. Neglect is another thing. These wits never criticize Coolidge for what he might be criticized for.8 Coolidge cannot be much hurt by calumny. As he says of his living critics, “I shall always consider it the highest tribute to my administration that the opposition have based so little of their criticism on what I have really said and done.” It is we who are hurt by the calumny to him. Of all the departed presidents Mr. Coolidge is probably the one who most “shouldst be living at this hour” with our country deep in debt, waste, and agitation.

IV. In 1928 if Calvin Coolidge had chosen to run for reelection, he would surely have been reelected, and had he been in office at the time of the Crash, he might have averted the Depression that followed. Perhaps one day I shall write an essay entitled, “If Coolidge Had Not Been Reelected in 1928.” In it I shall contrast the wisdom of what Coolidge did in his second full term with the folly of what Hoover would surely have done, how the stock market crash would have been prolonged under Hoover into a depression, how as a consequence a desperate people might have elected a frivolous revolutionary as their next president, setting off new rounds of compassionate folly, equally unable to restore prosperity, and instituting constitutional innovations that by changing the relation of people and government, would gradually sap their self-reliant strength and inevitably lead to either a national bankruptcy or a national socialism, or both, and I would go on to speculate how all the while under a Hoover and high tariffs the American Depression would have become world-wide bringing down civil regimes and replacing them with socialist tyrannies, especially in Germany where a bellicose hater might well wage world war, happy in the deaths of millions, and oblivious to all the unforeseen consequences, win or lose, generation unto generation. This is speculation, of course, but not without a basis.9

To the degree that one discovers in Coolidge the virtues of the statesman, that is, the firm grasp of principles, the penetrating insight into conditions and men, and the gifts, in a democracy, to persuade the governed and their representatives to embrace that wisdom, often against the gusts of their desires and the designs of their demagogues — to the degree that one finds the statesman in Coolidge, one must conclude that in office he might have averted the Great Depression and thus all its terrible consequences. There is considerable reason to think that Coolidge did have that virtue. In 1929 America was considerably more prosperous, more content, and more peaceful—war with Mexico having been averted—than in 1923 when Coolidge accepted the presidency. One reason was that Coolidge vetoed foolish and expensive legislation.

Did Coolidge also see into the future? His wife reports he saw a slump coming and others report he thought Hoover imprudent. Certainly he would have done many things differently than his successor. Yet as the convention approached, Coolidge did not put his weight behind another candidate, say for example Dwight Morrow, and he did not, more responsibly still, allow himself to be nominated. One seems compelled to conclude that this inactivity marks the limit of his virtue. Of course, lapses of omission are much harder to assert than blunders of commission.
- to be continued in Part II

Michael Platt studied at Deerfield, Harvard (BA), Oxford, and Yale (M. Phil and PhD). Over his career, he has chiefly taught Political Science, Philosophy, and Literature, and at a variety of institutions including Dartmouth, University of Dallas, Philosophic Institute, Germany at Heidelberg, Greifswald, Baylor, Schreiner and The International Theological Institute in Austria, among others. He has lectured widely In the United States, Canada, and Europe for over forty years. His work has been supported by St. Johns College (Santa Fe), the National Endowment of Humanities, and the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung (Germany). When not teaching on campus, Dr. Platt is a resident of Fredericksburg, Texas.(full bio and other works)

This is updated from the annual address to the Coolidge Foundation in 1992; thanks to the Foundation and its Executive Secretary, Mrs. Cynthia Bittinger, to the Liberty Fund, for whom I conducted a meeting on “Coolidge, Thrift and Liberty,” and to John Karol, producer of Things of the Spirit, a biographical film on Coolidge, for opportunities to share and improve it.

The Autobiography of Calvin Coolidge (1929; reprint Academy Books: Rutland, Vermont, 1984) is always available from the Coolidge Foundation in Plymouth Notch (05056).

I feel fortunate to have seen some of this close up, as a boy in summers, living across from a farm not far from the Notch; the same farmer, Mr. Howard Bixby, still farms there now. I can hear him calling the cows now. (As a boy I thought “Yalta” was the name of the cow who gave him the most trouble and, as a consequence, was spared the rod least, his blows coinciding with her name.)

See Charles E. Garman, Letters, Lectures, and Addresses (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1909), the Festschrift, Studies in Philosophy and Psychology (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1906). A pamphlet of Garman’s addressed to Coolidge’s class will appear in the Spring 1994 issue of Continuity: Journal of History, No. 17 with remarks by the present author.

The three collections of Coolidge’s speeches, Have Faith in Massachusetts (1919), The Price of Freedom (1924), and Foundations of the Republic (1926), can be bought secondhand.

For not appointing Dwight Morrow Secretary of State, not confronting the folly of disarmament directly, not detecting the clandestine monetary “stabilization” of Strong and Norman, and not opposing the corrupting influence of that most intemperate of idealisms, Prohibition, which Morrow did oppose.

For the view that Hoover’s philanthropic feelings, wage interventions, and protective tariffs turned the Crash into the Depression, see Paul Johnson, Modern Times (New York: Harper & Row, 1983), s.v.