Gusset plates and O-rings – a lie fit for a museum

I didn’t really follow the story, but this latest piece of information I found at 3:00 in a 9/11 video has me convinced that this too was a simple controlled demolition of a blocked off bridge. Add vicsims and you have a great excuse to jack up gas taxes and pay for a new bridge, without anyone daring to question the rationale.

Why? Because we are told that a piece of metal, a gusset plate, was too weak to support the extra construction vehicles on what was likely an over-engineered bridge (like all have to be) and caused the bridge to collapse.

So sure are they that a small (relatively) plate caused a massive bridge to collapse that it earned a place in a museum. They wouldn’t lie if it placed in a museum, would they? (think 9/11, dinosaurs if unsure) If you believe a simple set of plates was enough to let a whole bridge fall into a river, then you’ll believe a Canadian truck whacking an overhead beam was enough to do the same. Patently absurd. Where are A&E on this issue?

Reminds me of a certain O ring that was faulty in another phony event, the Challenger disaster. To think that if this a genuine event, which it was not, could be blamed on a leaking seal, with all its over engineering, shows how those that make these hoaxes think the public is plane stupid.

Of course, the official story of why WTC7 collapsed was burning office furniture – not even the diesel tanks we were told were in the building for the generators.

One of the key elements that caused the Interstate 35W Bridge to collapse is now on display in Minneapolis. It comes less than a week before the 10-year anniversary of when the bridge fell. A metal gusset plate was identified as the first piece of the bridge to fail when it collapsed on Aug. 1, 2007.

Post navigation

2 thoughts on “Gusset plates and O-rings – a lie fit for a museum”

“Richard Feynman, considering whether or not to do the O-ring-in-ice-water demonstration in the Challenger disaster hearings:
“I think, ‘I could do this tomorrow while we’re all sitting around, listening to this [Richard] Cook crap we heard today. We always get ice water in those meetings; that’s something I could do to save time.’
“Then I think, ‘No, that would be gauche.’
“But then I think of Luis Alvarez, the physicist. He’s a guy I admire for his gutsiness and sense of humor, and I think, ‘If Alvarez was on this commission, he would do it, and that’s good enough for me.”www.6911norfolk.com…

Savechat: Saved Threaded Fakeologist Chat

It’s important to name those that are charged by police. Why? In an open society, we need to see who the police detain to keep an eye on them from wrongdoing by the state. So why do we get the victim name (22) but not the perps? What’s the courthouse? Where can we see these […]

@OPP_HSD If you’re going to buzz my phone at any hour I need to know more details about a case before I’m going to agree to help, let alone read these annoying texts. Please note I do not get involved in domestic disputes, especially if children are involved. 00 Be the 1st to vote.

Ball Earth Skeptic: Fakeologist's Ball Earth Skeptic

This video has nothing to do with the shape of the earth, yet it’s labeled so. If he’s trying to discredit NASA, the fake suit is certainly a worthy way, but there are hundreds of easier ways to discredit NASA. After all these years, it is becoming clearer to me that this campaign is about … Continue reading Flat Earth Clues 13 – The Lost Nail – clearly dba