Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Cloward-Piven Immigration Endgame & The Death Of The GOP

by JASmius

Trumpmania is, at its heart, a massive, delusional, reactionary fit of raging frustration at the now-immutable "fundamental transformation" of the United States of America that could have been at least somewhat averted if a lot of the same people hadn't taken a walk on Mitt Romney four years ago for "not being conservative enough". The term "Obamnesty" would certainly have never entered the nation's political lexicon, at the very least.

For the nation’s Hispanic population, youth is a defining characteristic. For example, among Hispanic eligible voters, 44% are Millennial Hispanics – the single largest cohort of Hispanic eligible voters. And among the nation’s Millennials, Hispanics are a greater share than they are among all American adults – Hispanics make up 21% of all U.S. Millennials versus 15% of all adults in 2014....

The disproportionately young profile of Latinos in the U.S. is driven by the overwhelming youth of U.S.-born Hispanics. With a median age of nineteen, nearly half (47%) of U.S.-born Latinos are younger than eighteen. This is similar to the youth share among the nation’s other major racial or ethnic group with a large immigrant population – U.S.-born Asians, of whom 49% are younger than eighteen. By comparison, just 27% of U.S.-born blacks and 20% of U.S.-born whites are younger than eighteen.

The current immigration wave, mostly from Latin America and Asia, has brought fifty-nine million immigrants to the U.S. over the last fifty years and peaked in the early 2000s. About half of today’s U.S.-born Latinos (47%) and 80% of today’s U.S.-born Asians are the children of immigrants, many of whom came during this recent wave, which helps to explain the striking youth numbers for these groups.

The Democrats knew exactly what they were doing all those years ago when they broke the previously established pattern of allowing the nation's culture and economy to have generation-long breathing spaces in-between immigration influxes for the newcomers to assimilate into the "melting pot" and become Americans. In my lifetime the Dems haven't allowed there to be any reprieves, keeping the immigration floodgates wide open, and have actively and militantly warred against the very idea of assimilation and Americanization via the "multi-culti" mania. And they deftly duped the GOP in the process by exploiting both the "We're a nation of immigrants" sentimental ethic and the "cheap labor" economic angle. It was the long-term "fundamental transformation" project of which The Age Of The One has been the final act: the demographic transformation of America from an Anglo-Saxon political culture of constitutionalism, limited government, and individual liberties, to a Romanized political culture of paternalistic authoritarianism.

And now the Left is exploiting the suicidally "populist" reaction of a large plurality of former conservatives who are screeching for a return to a demographic America that no longer exists and embracing, in the bitterest of ironies, a variation of the very paternalistic authoritarianism they had heretofore rejected on a fundamentally racial/ethnic basis (i.e. "working class whites").

At some point in the not too-distance future — 2016 may be that future — winning the white vote by twenty-five or even thirty points, which is very, very hard to do for any candidate, may not be enough to make up for the massive losses Republicans are experiencing among the growing contingent of non-white voters.

Those basic demographic facts are why the 2012 Republican autopsy recommended that the party find a way to be for some form of comprehensive immigration reform. That the party not only hasn’t done that but is well on its way to nominating a candidate who advocates building a wall across the southern border and making Mexico pay for it speaks to how damaging the 2016 campaign has been for the GOP.

If nothing changes — in terms of the booming growth among non-white voters and the GOP’s inability to communicate with them — the 2016 election may only be the tip of the demographic iceberg for Republicans. The 2020 and 2024 presidential elections could be [Democrat] blowouts.

Where the 2012 Republican autopsy erred is in the notion that they had to "be for some form of comprehensive immigration reform". That weak-minded misapprehension was grounded in the false notion that all Hispanics and Latinos think monolithically alike - in this case, that they are all inherently for amnesty and open borders and unrestricted immigration in perpetuity. But that simply isn't true (just ask the Director's wife for an earful on that subject). Like every other demographic group, Hispanics and Latinos are made up of individuals who have different temperaments and backgrounds and views and levels of persuadability. Many are far more likely to be turned from the Dark Side if they are microcosmically engaged by Republican candidates and campaigns rather than top-down pandered to in one-size-fits-all fashion from above and without.

The key question is this: Can Republicans change? … In researching my book Going Red, I spoke with people in minority communities who echoed those findings, but went further. Too often, Republican campaigns treat these communities almost as destinations for anthropological research rather than as communities to engage and embrace. In the past two election cycles, the GOP dispensed with the kind of peer-to-peer politics at which Barack Obama excelled in favor of national messaging that sounded too much like lectures.

And too often, the GOP remained ignorant of the specific Hispanic communities it tried to address, offering the same message to voters of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Colombian, Venezuelan, and Central American descent. Voters in these ethnic groups have many common interests, but they’re often as different as white Americans of Italian and Irish descent. Plus, much depends on where in the country they live. Hispanics in Jefferson County, Colorado, for instance, have roots that go back generations, and as such are not focusing on immigration as much as they are issues at play in their lives now. State Representative Jon Keyser calls them “the four Es” — the economy, education, energy, and the environment. “I hope that we don’t have presidential candidates that come to Jeffco and just want to talk about illegal immigration,” Keyser told me.

People in these communities want honest engagement, even when potential disagreements arise. E.J. Otero, a retired Air Force colonel who became the first Hispanic to win a major-party nomination to Congress from West Tampa, expressed his frustration when fellow Republicans don’t show up to compete. “You’re not going to [win] as a Republican and have a TV ad and say, 'Vote for me because I’m a great guy,'” Otero explains about West Tampa, “and not go to their local meetings in their neighborhoods. It all comes down to the handshake.” [emphases added]

Here's the bottom line, folks: Ronald Reagan won a forty-four-State landslide in 1980 by winning 56% of the white vote; in 2012 Mitt Romney won 59% of the white vote and lost by five million votes. This is why Trumpmania is a fool's gold dead-end - winning more and more of a shrinking demographic is the path to political extinction, not political restoration.

But that doesn't binarily mean "moving left" and amnesty-pandering to compete for Hispanic/Latino votes on Democrat terms, which is also a fool's errand. It means actually recruiting members of that and other minority demographics on an individual basis with the "gospel" of constitutional conservatism. It means...well, deploying an actual ground game. The values of our nation's founding are not racially/ethnically delimited, after all - just look at who our most electable candidate was this cycle....

....and who is the last #NeverTrump hope....

There could be - or, rather, could have been - hordes more where Senators Rubio and Cruz came from if only the Republican Party had had the right, clear-eyed conservative vision and the willingness to do the hard legwork to implement it. Or, rather, "fine-tune" the arrangement that George W. Bush (who won a near-majority of the Hispanic vote in 2004 versus Mitt Romney's 27% eight years later) had before the latter and John McCain let it go to seed. Maybe, someday, there could be again, if you're of the Director's unshakably optimistic mien.

And if the GOP wasn't careening toward making this the face of the party.

See why I say that Trumplicans have waved the white flag of surrender even as they insist they're "FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHTing!" to the end?

...

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

However, if you still believe your copyright has been violated, we accept notifications of alleged copyright violations in accordance with the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. Note that if you materially misrepresent a claim of copyright infringement you will be liable for damages (including costsand attorney fees). We require the following information in order to respond to your request: Describe in detail the copyrighted work that you believe has been infringed upon (for example, “The copyrighted work is the code that appearson http://www.example.com/thecode.html) Identify the material that you claim is infringing the copyrighted work listed in #1. Include relevant URL’s that will allow us to identify the work. Your address, telephone number,and email address. Include the following statement “I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above as allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.” Include thefollowing statement “I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.” Sign the notification, type your full name, sign it electronicallyif submitted via email. Send the notification to politicalpistachio@yahoo.com. Please place in the subject line Political Pistachio Copyright Infringement.

You can Email me to bitch and complain if you so desire, as well. In the event that you are offended by my site please advise me of the offensive material by Email, and I will promptly print the Email, and then place it in my shredder to serve as kindling for my fireplace.