I used a tangle Turk’s head eye-splice, with a grommets I picked up from Houdini.

The popular gospel prescribes that the ‘60s
Cybermen were where it was at, and anything that arrived subsequently
besmirched their memory, to a greater or lesser extent (the lesser extent being
a cameo in Carnival of Monsters). And,
design-wise, I’ll give you that the pre-Invasion,
Troughton models possessed a suitably impersonal, imposing factor. But,
crucially, they weren’t interesting.
Okay, first time out of the gate they sounded freaky, and in The Moonbase they were given to the
occasional winning bout of sarcasm (“Clever,
clever clever”), but the reason I favour the subsequent Telosians is the
same reason they’re often on the receiving end of opprobrium: personality. And
leader of the pack for charismatic Cybermen is undoubtedly the magnificent
Cyber Robbie. HE IS GOOD!

Stevenson: But surely, Doctor, the
Cybermen died out years ago?

It’s self-evident that, this being the only
complete Cybermen story at the time, it’s where Eric Saward took all his cues
for their ‘80s incarnation, from “Excellent”
(Cyber Banks picked up emotively where Cyber Robbie left off), to gold dust (as
dubiously variable in effectiveness here as it is when Ace is ploughing down
Cybermen with her catapult, so there isn’t any real regression, or progression,
to sneer at; a gold-fuelled Cybermat can snog a Cyberman to death, but a billion-carat
planet has no effect on them), to the human agent in cahoots with the Cybermen
(even if he isn’t really, Kellman’s
still a thoroughly bad egg; at least the Doctor doesn’t profess to having
misjudged him, though), to the desire to use a great big bomb to blow up a
planet, to an oppressed species wanting to get their own back on their
cybernetic intimidators (Vogans, Cryons).

Vorus: You have the philosophy of a
cringing mouse, Tyrum!

Saward liked the Cybermen, of course,
whereas Robert Holmes really didn’t, but that disdain only yields positives for
the story (aside, perhaps from referring to them as robots, but hey, even Terry
Nation was making that mistake with the Daleks four years down the line).
Indeed, easily the weakest facet of Revenge
of the Cybermen is the society on Voga, which has been plundered wholesale
from the Hackneyed Alien Handbook, lacking the humour Holmes brought to, say
the Inter Minorians in Carnival of
Monsters.

Vorus (David Collings) has a Holmesian line in colourful
descriptive passages, sure (he wanted Vogans to be free, living on the surface,
“not cowering like worms in the Earth”),
and Tyrum (Kevin Stoney) supplies occasionally endearing absent-mindedness (“Hmmm? To the coal mines”) and has a
winning thing for carrying bags of gold dust around with him (perhaps he uses
them as leg weights?), while Michael Wisher (Magrik, resembling a very grey Ringo Starr) displays some fine prop acting,
dabbing away at his nasty cough (gold lung?), but the Vogans are fatally dull
(and don’t even have a few glitter guns in storage, by the looks of things),
and their political bickering banal. Unforgivably so for such a fine bunch of
actors assembled under the latex.

And those on Nerva aren’t much better.
Ronald Leigh-Hunt evidences that his soporific barking in The Seeds of Death was no fluke as he returns here for more, moving
from ‘60s futurism to ‘70s flares like he’s a Chuck Heston adrift from his
rightful era, struggling manfully from Planet
of the Apes to The Omega Man. If
only they had gone for Ronald over Michael Craig’s similarly textured cardboard
for Terror of the Vervoids, we’d have
a RLH trilogy to be proud of. One might, as such, see Revenge as a forerunner to Blade
Runner, the TARDIS crew excepted; a machine, thanks to the mastery that is
Cyber Robbie, is the most alive character, fittingly following up his amazing
portrayal of the Karkus in The Mind
Robber.

Kellman: Commander, I’m afraid you’ll
have to kill these people. They’ve brought the plague in here.

The
Doctor: Who’s
the homicidal maniac?

Well, okay, I’m overstating it a little.
Aside from the main trio, the reason to watch the first two episodes is Jeremy
Wilkin’s hugely enjoyable (and he’s evidently hugely enjoying himself)
performance as Kellman. His disdain for and mockery of Stevenson, Warner (Alec
Wallis) and Lester (William Marlowe) almost justifies their being pure
cardboard (“You’re not frightening me,
Commander. You won’t shoot”). And he is quite
the ruthlessly self-regarding homicidal maniac, not thinking twice about wiping
out the crew of Nerva as a means to profit (not that Vorus comes over at all well
either, possibly even less so, since he stoops to finding moral justification
for his actions).

Cyber
Leader: Eight
minutes. In eight minutes the accursed planet of gold will be utterly
destroyed. Annihilated. Vaporised. It is good.

Even Revenge’s
title gets stick (although, it’s only the Vogans who actually use the word: “I wonder, has Vorus in the madness of his
vanity brought down the vengeance of the Cybermen upon us again?”), again
preceding an ‘80s example; Cybermen, like the Jedi, cannot take revenge. Maybe
not in theory, but Cyber Robbie can give it a damn good try. Cyber Robbie is
also why there’s a considerable uptick in quality halfway through the story.
Before that, it’s “okay”, but there’s a simple reason the third episode is the
best: Cyber Robbie delivers all the speeches.

Cyber
Leader: You
two are especially privileged. You are about to die in the biggest explosion
ever witnessed in this solar system. It will be a magnificent spectacle.
Unhappily, I will be unable to appreciate it.

He’s absolutely the key to making these
flared, discotheque Cybermen a success, whether standing hands on hips, mocking
his prisoners through a Canadian burr (“Oh,
you are mistaken. When the beacon crashes into Voga, we shall be watching from
a safe distance, but you will have a much closer view”). As the Doctor
says, “Nice sense of irony. I thought for
a moment he was going to smile”. Even the Cybermats (no longer cute) get in
on the dancefloor moves.

While Revenge
is to be feted for its humorous elements, that doesn’t mean it falls into the
“So bad, its good” category, or that it’s “a
horrible mess” (as About Time puts it), “A contradictory, tedious and
unimaginative mess” (The
Discontinuity Guide) that has guilty-pleasure redeeming features. And,
while I’m part of the second wave nostalgia that came with it being the first
video release, I’m not an easy target for that reason (The Seeds of Death, the fourth video put out, is a snooze however
you cut it; and who exactly at the BBC was a RLH fan in ’83-4?)

The
Doctor: You’ve
no home planet. No influence. Nothing. You’re just a pathetic bunch of tin
soldiers skulking about the galaxy in an ancient spaceship.

Yeah, a whole lot of Revenge doesn’t make perfect sense, mostly on the part of Cyber
Robbie’s ruses. But he’s an eccentric sort, isn’t he, and most schemes of most
villains break down when looked at closely. I prefer the position of the Cybermen here, very much prefiguring the
budget-conscious Zygons, as “just a bunch
of…” Even the Doctor draws attention to the fact their ship looks like shit
(the idea that there are enough parts for a Cyber army in there suggests the
Leader has brain rot).

I don’t really buy into it being victim to
the much-stated problems of a ‘60s writer (Davis) trying to tackle ‘70s
formatting. If you want to go that route, The
Android Invasion is far more problematic, because, crucially it doesn’t
have sufficient self-consciousness or sense of fun. Or energy. That’s probably
why, although this has just as many plot failings as The Moonbase (well, okay, maybe not quite as many), the failings
are to be celebrated whereas Moonbase’s
just grate.

The
Doctor: And
that was the end of the Cybermen. Except as gold-plated souvenirs that people
use as hat stands.

Lester: Watch it Doctor, I think
you’ve riled him.

Holmes actually does the Cybermen a service
here, even if the gold weakness is injudicious; as in Tomb, he succeeds in mythologising them (the ‘80s equivalent of
this is the Earthshock flashback
sequence, which is really mythologising the series for viewers of the series,
so something else, but nevertheless, both are illustrative of the
stylistic/visual gulfs between eras, with the seven years from Invasion making the their last
appearance black and white story ancient history – it may as well have been Flash Gordon – while another seven years until Earthshock was the difference between Logan’s Run and Star Wars
– immense).

He details in a few sentences how their once mighty force
throughout the galaxy has been decimated in the Cyber War, thanks to the
invention of the ludicrously named glitter gun. The Doctor also drops in tasty (golden)
nuggets about Cyber bombs being banned by the Armageddon Convention (“Cybermen do not subscribe to any theory of
morality in war, Doctor”), albeit as has been pointed out, their
effectiveness is highly variable. Perhaps that’s why they were banned; if they
can blow up a planet when placed at its core but barely leave a scratch on
corpses when detonated elsewhere, they’re presumably difficult to a get a grip
on, megaton-wise.

Patchy kind of sums up Revenge’s production on all fronts: redressed scripts and redressed
sets. Michael E Briant tended to make a virtue of location shoots, less so
studio work (much like the later Michael, Robinson), but Wookey Hole rather
does for him here. Not only is the marriage of studio and location Voga very
obvious, the caves footage lacks dynamism. There’s the occasional nice shot
(the Cybermen standing all silvery in the half-light, taking out Vogans), or
sequence (the rock fall is very well done), but it has a tendency to plod as
much as the Vorus-Tyrum arguments.

It probably isn’t coincidental that the
best parts are where Peter Howell’s augmented Cyber-groove kicks in, rather
than Cary Blyton’s attention-wondering kazoo and rattle-attack. The Cybermen boarding
Nerva is a standout at the end of the second episode, and Briant also pulls off
the occasional stylistically bravura shot (the Doctor leaping from Kellman’s
booby-trapped quarters, landing in the corridor in a haze of smoke and overhead
studio lights). I even rather like the spinning loo roll used for the climactic
approach to Voga, much derided as it is.

What really sees Revenge along, though, is the main crew. I think this season’s
might be my favourite line-up, closely followed by Season 16, even though the
twelfth is far from my favourite and Sarah solo with the Doctor can be sometimes
on the grating side. It’s the alchemy Harry provides that’s key, a well-meaning
plodder who is instantly the butt of his companions’ jokes. The Doctor’s at it
at once here, taking the piss out of him for wanting to keep a rapidly-vanishing
time ring (“You knew that was going to
happen, didn’t you?”)

Sarah: Harry, will you just shut up
about your rotten gold!

The banter between Sarah and Harry is to be
particularly relished. Obvious, certainly, to have Sarah’s feminist clash with
Harry’s old school tie chauvinist, but the chemistry between Ian Marter and Elizabeth
Sladen makes it work gangbusters: the scene where he beams down to Voga and she
indignantly wakes up in his arms (“Well,
that’s marvellous, isn’t it? Here I am, trying to save your life…”), or she’s
laughing at his flight of fantasy about a solid gold stethoscope and “a quiet practice in the country”, or
reproaching him for his comments on “Tibias,
or rather fetlocks like a carthorse” (“My
ankles aren’t thick!”)

The
Doctor: Harry,
were you trying to undo this?

Harry: Well, naturally.

The
Doctor: Did
you make the rocks fall, Harry?

Harry: Er, well. I suppose I must
have done.

The
Doctor: (laughing, then) HARRY SULLIVAN IS AN IMBECILE!

Tom, in his third appearance, has
thoroughly found his feet, both in moral rectitude (“I’m sorry gentlemen, I can’t allow it” in response to their wish to
shoot Warner) ruthlessness (“After you’ve
been bitten, Kellman, you’ll have just ten seconds to remember where that
Pentalion Drive is, if you want to live”), establishing the contents of his
pockets (jelly babies, fine, but an apple core… if Kellman had continued rooting
around, he’d probably have found a filthy snot rag next), and improvisation (“Fragmentise? Ah well, I suppose we can’t
expect decent English from a machine”). And then there’s the story’s most
famous exchange (above); Baker got on with Marter, but even if Holmes had held
sway and persuaded Philip Hinchcliffe to keep Harry (heartening to note
Hinchcliffe later admitted Holmes might have been right), I suspect the star
would gradually have whittled the numbers down, certainly if he was of a view
the Doctor didn’t need anyone at all, besides a talking cabbage.

Revenge
of the Cybermen may be a mess, but it isn’t a dull
mess. Well, the bits that don’t involve Vorus and Tyrum aren’t. It has the best
of TARDIS crews, the best of Cyber Leaders, and a Holmes rewrite where he can’t
help but let his flair shine through. My Revenge
of the Cybermen! My glory!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Vampire Academy (2014) My willingness to give writer Daniel Waters some slack on
the grounds of early glories sometimes pays off (Sex and Death 101) and sometimes, as with this messy and indistinct
Young Adult adaptation, it doesn’t. If Vampire
Academy plods along as a less than innovative smart-mouthed Buffy rip-off that might be because, if
you added vampires to Heathers, you
would probably get something not so far from the world of Joss Whedon. Unfortunately
inspiration is a low ebb throughout, not helped any by tepid direction from
Daniel’s sometimes-reliable brother Mark and a couple of hopelessly plankish
leads who do their best to dampen down any wit that occasionally attempts to
surface.

I can only presume there’s a never-ending pile of Young
Adult fiction poised for big screen failure, all of it comprising multi-novel
storylines just begging for a moment in the Sun. Every time an adaptation
crashes and burns (and the odds are that they will) another one rises, hydra-like,
hoping…

The Avengers 4.3: The Master Minds The Master Minds hitches
its wagon to the not uncommon Avengers
trope of dark deeds done under the veil of night. We previously encountered it
in The Town of No Return, but Robert
Banks Stewart (best known for Bergerac,
but best known genre-wise for his two Tom Baker Doctor Who stories; likewise, he also penned only two teleplays for
The Avengers) makes this episode more
distinctive, with its mind control and spycraft, while Peter Graham Scott, in
his third contribution to the show on the trot, pulls out all the stops,
particularly with a highly creative climactic fight sequence that avoids the usual
issue of overly-evident stunt doubles.

Paddington 2 (2017)
(SPOILERS) Paddington
2 is every bit as upbeat and well-meaning as its predecessor. It also has more
money thrown at it, a much better villain (an infinitely better villain) and, in terms of plotting, is more
developed, offering greater variety and a more satisfying structure. Additionally,
crucially, it succeeds in offering continued emotional heft and heart to the
Peruvian bear’s further adventures. It isn’t, however, quite as funny.

Even suggesting such a thing sounds curmudgeonly, given the
universal applause greeting the movie, but I say that having revisited the
original a couple of days prior and found myself enjoying it even more than on
first viewing. Writer-director Paul King and co-writer Simon Farnaby introduce
a highly impressive array of set-ups with huge potential to milk their absurdity
to comic ends, but don’t so much squander as frequently leave them undertapped.

Paddington’s succession of odd jobs don’t quite escalate as
uproariously as they migh…

Altered Carbon Season One
(SPOILERS) Well, it looks
good, even if the visuals are absurdly indebted to Blade Runner. Ultimately, though, Altered Carbon is a disappointment. The adaption of Richard
Morgan’s novel comes armed with a string of well-packaged concepts and futuristic
vernacular (sleeves, stacks, cross-sleeves, slagged stacks, Neo-Cs), but
there’s a void at its core. It singularly fails use the dependable detective
story framework to explore the philosophical ramifications of its universe –
except in lip service – a future where death is impermanent, and even botches the
essential goal of creating interesting lead characters (the peripheral ones,
however, are at least more fortunate).

Dreamscape (1984)
(SPOILERS) I wasn’t really au fait with movies’ box office performance until the end of the ‘80s, so I think I had an idea that Dennis Quaid (along with Jeff Bridges) was a much bigger star than he was, just on the basis of the procession of cool movies he showed up in (The Right Stuff, Enemy Mine, Innerspace, D.O.A.) The truth was, the public resisted all attempts to make him The Next Big Thing, not that his sly-grinned, cocky persona throughout the decade would lead you to believe his dogged lack of success had any adverse effect on his mood. Dreamscape was one of his early leading-man roles, and if it’s been largely forgotten, it also inherits a welcome cult status, not only through being pulpy and inventive on a fairly meagre budget, but by being pretty good to boot. It holds up.

The X-Files 11.1: My Struggle III
(SPOILERS) Good grief. Have things become so terminal for Chris Carter
that he has to retcon his own crap from the previous season, rather than the
(what he perceived as) crap written by others? Carter, of course, infamously
pretended the apocalyptic ending of Millennium
Season Two never happened, upset by the path Glen Morgan and James Wong, left
to their own devices, took with his baby. Their episode was one of the greats
of that often-ho-hum series, so the comedown was all the unkinder as a result. In
My Struggle III, at least, Carter’s
rewriting something that wasn’t very good in the first place. Only, he replaces
it with something that is even worse in the second.

Darkest Hour (2017)
(SPOILERS) Watching Joe Wright’s return to the rarefied
plane of prestige – and heritage to boot – filmmaking following the execrable
folly of the panned Pan, I was struck
by the difference an engaged director, one who cares about his characters,
makes to material. Only last week, Ridley Scott’s serviceable All the Money in the World made for a pointed
illustration of strong material in the hands of someone with no such
investment, unless they’re androids. Wright’s dedication to a relatable Winston
Churchill ensures that, for the first hour-plus, Darkest Hour is a first-rate affair, a piece of myth-making that barely
puts a foot wrong. It has that much in common with Wright’s earlier Word War II
tale, Atonement. But then, like Atonement, it comes unstuck.

The X-Files 11.2: This
(SPOILERS) Glen Morgan returns with a really good idea, certainly one
with much more potential than his homelessness tract Home Again in Season 10, but seems to give up on its eerier
implications, and worse has to bash it round the head to fit the season’s
“arc”. Nevertheless, he’s on very comfortable ground with the Mulder-Scully
dynamic in This, who get to spend
almost the entire episode in each other’s company and might be on the best form
here since the show came back, give or take a Darin.

The Shape of Water (2017)
(SPOILERS) The faithful would have you believe it never went
away, but it’s been a good decade since Guillermo del Toro’s mojo was in full
effect, and his output since (or lack thereof: see the torturous wilderness
years of At the Mountains of Madness
and The Hobbit), reflected through
the prism of his peak work Pan’s
Labyrinth, bears the hallmarks of a serious qualitative tumble. He put his
name to stinker TV show The Strain,
returned to movies with the soulless Pacific
Rim and fashioned flashy but empty gothic romance Crimson Peak (together his weakest pictures, and I’m not forgetting
Mimic). The Shape of Water only seems to underline what everyone has been
saying for years, albeit previously confined to his Spanish language pictures: that
the smaller and more personal they are, the better. If his latest is at times a
little too wilfully idiosyncratic,
it’s also a movie where you can nevertheless witness it’s creator’s creativity
flowing untrammelled once mo…

Split (2016) (SPOILERS) M Night Shyamalan went from the toast of twist-based
filmmaking to a one-trick pony to the object of abject ridicule in the space of
only a couple of pictures: quite a feat. Along the way, I’ve managed to miss several
of his pictures, including his last, The
Visit, regarded as something of a re-locating of his footing in the low
budget horror arena. Split continues
that genre readjustment, another Blumhouse production, one that also manages to
bridge the gap with the fare that made him famous. But it’s a thematically
uneasy film, marrying shlock and serious subject matter in ways that don’t
always quite gel.

Shyamalan has seized on a horror staple – nubile teenage
girls in peril, prey to a psychotic antagonist – and, no doubt with the best
intentions, attempted to warp it. But, in so doing, he has dragged in themes
and threads from other, more meritable fare, with the consequence that, in the
end, the conflicting positions rather subvert his attempts at subversion…