As for how i feel on the subject i agree with most of what polarwarrior says on the first page of this thread.

I also think that there must be/have been many civilizations and wildlife under the crust of our planet. And i'm sure "TPTB" know all about the
subject but just allow these constant failed theorys to be mainstream for obvious reasons. Bearing in mind that this is the stuff taught to your kids
at school. As fact.

Heck, they could have even fabricated the bogus theorys themselves.

I wouldn't be surprised if aliens have been to the centre/core of the earth. I'm sure i've seen a lot of evidence on the internet that seems to
suggest so. Also i don't know if any of the brits on here saw "Danny Dyer : I Believe in UFO's" on BBC Three a few months ago. That was quite an
enlightening show for the average joe imo, i was surprised. Not that i needed cofirmation about a higher being/entity/race('s) existed, but its
refreshing to see it on a channel as mainstream as BBC Three.

The egyptions where supposed to have been visited by higher being aswell i'm sure. Maybe thats how they got a map of antartica.

So what is it. Hmm, I dont see any reason why they would say Auf Wiedersehen. If you dont know what it means, then let me explain real quick: 'Auf
Wiedersehen is german, and translated to english it means "Goodbye" '.

But the thing is, are they german?? Why did they speak english and then go off with "Auf Wiedersehen"?

Excuse me for making a typo and adding a "e" to the word "credence". Its happens when You use a cell phone to type. I am using a MyTouch so I use
a touch screen keyboard. "Massy" is a word formed using the word "mass" and the suffix "-y". "-y" meaning "having the quality of". I wanted
to use a more concise way to say "does not have as much mass as we thought it did" because as I said I am typing on a touch screen keyboard. Since
you made me define the words for you then I will take the time to elaborate on my post more.

There is also the conclusion that could be reached that since the Earth does not contain as much mass, less gravity is needed to keep it in place and
so the sun does not exert as much gravity and so it makes the idea of a small internal sun more palatable.

I was only pointing out the fact that the consequences of the theory, were it true, essentially support the idea.

Thanks for the English lesson.

I apologize for questioning the infallible experiments and knowledge of the all knowing and all seeing human race.I am well aware that we know
everything about the universe and Earth and have explored every part of both. I am also aware that we have solid knowledge about what gravity is and
how to measure it. I am also aware that there are no theories in science and all science is fact which is proven by "great experiments".

As much as I like this information, and it gives a lot to think about, i just wouldn't be able to believe another species/race/race of humans/aliens
live alongside us on this world, over history, it would be far too easy for someone to make a slip and a discovery is made mainstream.

I think if you went to the north or south pole yourself, you'd just find miles and miles of ice. But i haven't been there so i cant say that for
fact

First off , let me compliment you on yet another fine thread , with plenty of links and sources , as always .

To be honest , I have never so much as given even the slightest consideration to the hollow-earth-theory . I have always brushed it aside as nonsense
and ignored everything I have ever encountered concerning it .

I've been watching this thread develop and grow and my curiosity finally got the best of me , so I read your entire OP from start to finish . Boy ,
was I in for a surprise ! After your very fine presentation , I am no longer scoffing at the idea .

Just reinforces the old adage "never too old to learn" .

I will definitely be checking out the links you posted . Thanks for posting ., and congratulations on another thorough and well-presented thread .

Excuse me for making a typo and adding a "e" to the word "credence". Its happens when You use a cell phone to type. I am using a MyTouch so I use
a touch screen keyboard

Good job! I am impressed.

"Massy" is a word formed using the word "mass" and the suffix "-y". "-y" meaning "having the quality of".

I think that's pretty smarty. Pretty resourcefully.

I wanted to use a more concise way to say "does not have as much mass as we thought it did"

Scientists would say "not as massive as we thought", but who cares about these schmucks.

There is also the conclusion that could be reached that since the Earth does not contain as much mass, less gravity is needed to keep it in
place and so the sun does not exert as much gravity and so it makes the idea of a small internal sun more palatable.

Don't see an iota of logic in this.

I apologize for questioning the infallible experiments and knowledge of the all knowing and all seeing human race.

Thanks Phage! I was aware of those but most if not all are either to one side or the other, none of them seem to cut the north pole right in the
middle. I was just pointing that flying over the poles isn't some as ordinary as the poster I was replaying to made it sound.

Sure there are a whole lot of flights from China, New Deli, etc to the US that go over the north pole but like a said we are talking about a huge area
here and most flight paths tend to pass on either side of the pole and not exactly over it's center.

And when it comes to the South Pole things get a whole lot worse.

Again just pointing it out to be fair, not that I believe that we have holes in the caps of Earth that go to a inner world with a foggy sun which is
inhabited by all the mythical civilizations that we can think of, because I don't.

But if is to be creative (or inventive) why should this passage be a real hole visible to the naked eye and not something along the lines of the
Bermuda Triangle or Dragon's triangle?

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.