Advertisements

To read more than 200 comments...

click on the title of any post, it is a link to a separate page that shows all the comments. Scroll down to the bottom of the comments until you see the words newer and newest next to the number of comments on the right, those words are links that will lead you to a new page of comments. :)

Friday, July 04, 2014

Before there was Lindsay Lohan, there was another movie actress who did many of the same things Lindsay has done. Our actress once reached A list, which is something Lindsay probably won't ever do at this point. Our actress had a very quick and bright flame and then crashed and burned because she has no real acting talent. She still enjoys A+ list name recognition, but her acting resume is probably a C+ at this point. Our actress didn't start off quite as young as Lindsay, but made a name for herself beginning in her 20's. Our actress spent a lot of time on the casting couch. Lots. It was the only way she got any roles at all because she is that bad. She lucked into her biggest role and has tried not to have sex for parts any longer. She will have sex for other reasons though or things she wants. She loves things. Like Lindsay, our actress would steal anything not tied down. She was famous for never returning any item of jewelry or clothing that she wore during a photo shoot or on a movie set. It got so bad that when she walked in a huge event she had to buy everything herself because no one would give her anything.. It is still considered to be one of the bigger fashion fails of all time. Like Lindsay, our actress enjoys some drugs. She had to have a nose reconstruction because of all the coke she snorted. She tries to limit herself to pills and booze and pot now. She has a lot of health problems for a woman of her still fairly young age because of her past drug abuse.

This is totally true. My first PR job in LA, the office manager used to be a huge party girl back in the day, she slept with David Cassidy when she was a teenager. She told us stories about partying and doing tons of coke with Sharon Stone.

She looks good because she's been getting subtle work done along the way. God Bless her.

Stone's Gap outfit at the Oscars is usually considered a major fashion moment. The outfit was classy and elegant, and people lauded her for her resourcefulness. It went over well and I've seen that outfit mentioned on several E-type fashion specials in a glowing way.

She had a brain hemorrhage or stroke or something years ago, and had to have surgery and a long recovery period. I don't think she's an awful actress, not a great one, but not as bad as portrayed. And if the fashion "disaster" happens to be the black GAP turtleneck, I thought she looked fine. A disaster would be along the lines of Bjork's swan dress.

She was absolutely gorgeous - luminous - in her prime. And looked pretty darned good into her 50's. Can still look gorgeous today, with makeup and lighting.

But I always had the impression she was a raging bitch.

I heard she went to Davos and bullied all the rich guys in the room to pledge for mosquito nets or something ... most of them never paid, no one knows if the nets were ever delivered. Got the impression it was more about her showing off than actual doing her due diligence and doing good for anybody. All show, no follow-through.

In terms of the fashion fail, maybe Enty was talking about Sharon Stone wearing her husband's dress shirt to the Oscars? She paired it with a long fancy skirt. It didn't look great but it wasn't an EPIC fashion fail.

As much as I wouldn't call her " flawless" or anything that extreme, I would agree sharon stone is a decent actress. She is absolutely not in the same camp as lindsay Lohan in that regard. Also plenty of actresses keep stuff they are give for awards ceremonies and plenty sleep around for parts. When sharon stone started out it was probably the only way to get decent parts. Plenty of them do coke as well. I'm not quite sure why she is being singled out here to be honest. The same stuff could probably be said for most a list actresses of her age, to one degree or another. I also suspect when she wore her own stuff to awards ceremonies it's because she wanted to...designers are known fame whores and they would rush to dress her for the small price of the outfit and she can well afford to buy her own designer frock. It's not like she couldn't afford a shirt or a jumper and was forced to wear her husbands shirt or a gap sweater. She also had nothing that would constitute one of the bigger fashion fails of all time.

Sharon stone was not the original Lindsay Lohan. I call total bs on this blind.

Sharon Stone definitely has/had limited range as an actress. Basic Instinct was so campy it didn't really call for acting, per se.

She was dreadful in Sliver. With a good director she can perform adequately but she's basically playing above her pay grade in most roles. The thing about her is, maybe a lot of people sleep around for roles in Hollywood but Sharon Stone is GORGEOUS. She truly does have movie star looks.

Both of those fashion fail photographs look great. I wouldn't choose to wear either ensemble but she's so beautiful - and has a great body for clothes - that she pulls them both off.

I also think that about 90% of the time when she's at an event, or on the red carpet, her fashion style is impeccable.

Yes, many stars get styled, but you have to think something of their own fashion sense comes through, and a lot of them consistently look like fashion victims despite access to stylists, hair, makeup, borrowed clothes and accessories.

Sorry for serial posting. Wanted to add, I said the husband's shirt didn't look great, then I said it did. First time I was going from memory, second time I googled it. I decided like it! It would look like crap on me, I hasten to add, but she pulled it off.

I don't think Lohan has proven herself as an adult actress to be able to say she has " a ton of talent". Yes she was a good child actress, passable in the bratty teen role, but I can't say she has proven herself in anything of note.

Lindsay Lohan can be a good actress. She was believable as Meryl Streep's daughter in A Prairie Home Companion, directed by Robert Altman (who was monitored by Paul Thomas Anderson), and she holds her own next to people like Kevin Kline, Woody Harrelson, John C. Reilly, and Tommy Lee Jones.

Enty should know by now that success has little to do with talent, and that his opinion about somebody as an individual doesn't necessarily mean that the person in question is untalented and doesn't deserve any success because of so.

The fact is that there are many talented actors in the business who don't find work because they didn't have a breakout part in a film, or they lack some charisma on screen. I don't doubt that there are a dozen actresses who would have been as fine as Lohan in A Prairie Home Companion, but Lohan was good in it anyway.

Elizabeth Taylor hated her when she became a spokeswoman for AMFAR The reason was that Sharon's expensive demands of free everything (hotel rooms, food, clothes, jewelry, other outrageous perks, first class travel, entourage) were totally out of control and that they make very little money after funding her. She is now making a career of being a charity spokeswoman.

I loooove Sharon Stone. She is always my example as an actress aging gracefully with the kind of plastic surgery that you can't see, and she looks fabulous on and off the red carpet. I love her style so much! It's refreshing to see any celeb with their own taste and even better when she always looks amazing! Ok except for that shredded black dress abomination from thirty years ago someone linked to up top, but I still prefer actresses who go with their own style.

This reminds me of that story of a celebrity (Ellen?) showing an actress around her house and a watch going missing. The details are hazy now, but at the time everyone presumed the culprit was Lindsay Lohan.

Totally disagree. Very harsh and no reason for it. Lindsay has no real talent but Stone is. She was great in Casino and BI. She can act. Very unfair to characterize her as a no talent. And she's gorgeous, which Lohan isn't. Ridiculous to say she'd never get a job otherwise being beautiful and talented.

Advertisement

Search Crazy Days and Nights

Advertisement

Labels

Advertisement

Design By

Advertisement

Video

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.

Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements
Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.