I do not believe Horse needs a disambiguation page. Sarna is a BattleTech wiki, not Wikipedia, and therefore we do not need an entry about the animal. Unless there is another "Horse" worth mentioning we should return things to how they where. Thanks. --Ebakunin(talk|contribs) 23:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

MechWarrior Companion and Classic BattleTech Companion, both are just as much BattleTech books as the Novels that had Horse and the Prydes in them. Both of the RPG Companion supplements had stats for the Animal (definately not something that should be added to the Horse WikiPedia) and the Main Game also has Stats in Tactical Operations for Horse mounted Infantry. I fully intend on doing the due dillagence for both sets of the Horse Stats, and Perhaps even the BT Units.--Cameron 02:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

That's fine justification for an article on horses, as long as the articles deal with the in-universe context of the game. However, I did delete the info-less articles. BTW's policy is that all articles must have pertinent information at the time of creation. Placeholding articles are not necessary, as redlinks to non-existant articles are just fine (they spur development). What we do not want is an encyclopedia promising articles that do not deliver. Underdeveloped is fine; non-existant is right-out. --Revanche(talk|contribs) 14:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)