Re: Do White Nationalists support not-white claims for independence from White rule?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scififan

Yes.

For example, Guam, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands should become their own countries.

The US should not have military bases in over 100 nations.

Though again, ask yourself why so many non-Whites want to follow us and live in our countries, cities, towns, etc.

How about the four states where whites are not a majority of the population?
Hawaii: 23% non-Hispanic white
California: 40% non-Hispanic white
New Mexico: 40.5% non-Hispanic white
Texas: 45% non-Hispanic white

The Census Bureau defines some ethnic groups as being white that most white nationalists do not include in the white racial category, most notably Jews and Arabs.

United States Census Bureau defines White people as those "having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who reported “White” or wrote in entries such as Irish, German, Italian, Lebanese, Near Easterner, Arab, or Polish."

Re: Do White Nationalists support not-white claims for independence from White rule?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShakaZulu

How about the four states where whites are not a majority of the population?
Hawaii: 23% non-Hispanic white
California: 40% non-Hispanic white
New Mexico: 40.5% non-Hispanic white
Texas: 45% non-Hispanic white

The Census Bureau defines some ethnic groups as being white that most white nationalists do not include in the white racial category, most notably Jews and Arabs.

United States Census Bureau defines White people as those "having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who reported “White” or wrote in entries such as Irish, German, Italian, Lebanese, Near Easterner, Arab, or Polish."

An amendment can't be "unconstitutional" because an amendment is a part of the Constitution.

If the American people don't want a constitutional amendment, they can pass another amendment to nullify the first. That was done with the Prohibition of Alcohol Amendment (18th). It was the law of the land for 14 years and then repealed by the passage of the 21st amendment. No one has tried to repeal the 14th Amendment. The article that you linked leaves out that there was no time limit for ratification included in the 14th Amendment. That means that the states that ratified it AFTER Secretary of State Seward declared it to be ratified, still count. The last states to ratify the 14th Amendment were New Jersey and Ohio in the year 2003.

Since nobody has questioned the legality of the 15th Amendment which says that race is no bar to voting, and since the 15th only makes sense in the context of the 14th, the 14th Amendment is therefore fully operational. Hundreds of subsequent Supreme Court decisions are based on the constitutionality of the 14th Amendment. Look up the famous "Slaughterhouse Cases" for example.Slaughterhouse Cases &mdash; Infoplease.com

I support multiculturalism for nations that choose to be multicultural and I support monoculturalism for nations that want to be monocultural. Canada, for example is a multicultural nation by statute. Iceland and Japan are nations that want to remain monocultural. I support both Iceland and Japan in maintaining their traditional cultural and racial heritages.

I support the continuance and the growth of the white race through natural population growth and reversing the trend of below replacement rate Total Fertility. If any white nation wants to limit immigration as a part of white population growth, that's also fine with me. Australia, for example, used to have a "white Australia" policy. But a majority of the voters in Australia did away with that and now immigrants to Australia come from every racial group.
If the "One Australia" movement should come back into power and pass "white Australia" laws, I say "so be it." That's what it means to live in a democratic-republic.

"Pondering the smoking ruins of American racial policy, I wonder whether it isn’t time to say publicly what many, if not most, of both races know: It isn’t working. It isn’t going to work. If it were, it would have. If it were working, we would not need the unending laws to force the races together when they don’t want to be together. If people wanted diversity, it would happen without compulsion." - Fred Reed, January 2, 2014

"Those who rewrite history attempt to hide own disgrace." - Vladimir Putin, January 28th, 2015

Re: Do White Nationalists support not-white claims for independence from White rule?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShakaZulu

I support multiculturalism for nations that choose to be multicultural and I support monoculturalism for nations that want to be monocultural.

The majority of Whites never chose to live in a multicultural nation.

And Whites can't choose to live legally separated from non-Whites. We can move as far away from you non-Whites as possible, but you'll eventually follow. It's cost me and my family literally 10's of thousands of dollars so far in costs related to moving away from once nice and nearly crime-free neighborhoods that turned into crime-ridden cesspools practically overnight.

Most Whites I talk to today definitely want tougher immigration laws, yet our government and practically all our politicians are for open borders. It would be nearly impossible for me to explain the different reason why this is, but all one has to do is look at how the candidacy of Ron Paul is handled by the establishment and the media in this country.

Re: Do White Nationalists support not-white claims for independence from White rule?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg56

Such as the Chechen claims for autonomy from Russia?

As a Russian, I believe Chechens deserve nothing but genocide for killing local Russian population in the 90s. Therefore, every atrocity done by the Russian army was justified.

As a realist, I see the best scenario for Russia as walling off Northern Caucasus, deporting every single Muslim there, and feeding these quasi-autonomous regions with white phosphorus for misbehavior, just like Israel does in Gaza.

Re: Do White Nationalists support not-white claims for independence from White rule?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pax Ruthenia

As a Russian, I believe Chechens deserve nothing but genocide for killing local Russian population in the 90s. Therefore, every atrocity done by the Russian army was justified.

As a realist, I see the best scenario for Russia as walling off Northern Caucasus, deporting every single Muslim there, and feeding these quasi-autonomous regions with white phosphorus for misbehavior, just like Israel does in Gaza.

Every single White country that has an imperialist past, now has a race/ethnicity problem. IMO, imperialism (without settlement) has been the biggest mistake in the history of our peoples.

You would think that we could learn from our past. But I guess that's asking to much from the various so-called "patriots".