Published

Deadline tomorrow: UK government consultation on pension scams

On 5 December 2016, the UK government launched a consultation on pension scams. The government is asking for responses to four proposals aimed at making it harder for boiler room operations to scam people out of their pensions.

The deadline for responses is midnight, 13 February 2017. Click on the image to go to the consultation page:

The consultation website explains that the aim is to put in place series of measures to address three areas of pension scams:

a cold calling ban will cut off a key source of pension scams whilst also sending a clear message to consumers that they should hang-up if they are cold called about their pension

current legislation gives pension schemes limited scope to refuse a transfer to a scheme which looks like a scam, even if they have legitimate concerns as to the safety of a member’s savings. We are consulting on clarifying the law so that firms can block pension transfers based on clear objective criteria

single-member occupation pension schemes currently require no registration with The Pensions Regulator, and can be set up using a dormant company as the sponsoring employer. They are therefore an easy way for fraudsters to register a pension scheme with HMRC. We are consulting on making it a requirement that only active companies can register a pension scheme

These are, it seems to me, sensible ideas. Of course, it would have been better if the government had thought this through before April 2015 when it introduced “pension freedom” reforms, allowing people over 55 to access as much of their pension pot as they want to.

A timeline to this pension scams consultation

In September 2016, Darren Cooke of Red Circle Financial Planning launched a parliamentary petition calling for a ban on all cold-calling related to pensions or investments. 8,509 people have so far signed the petition.

In November 2016, the government announced that it was going to ban cold calling to sell pension investments. It was widely reported in the UK media that Philip Hammond, the UK chancellor, would announce the ban in his budget statement on 23 November 2016:

Philip Hammond did not announce a ban on cold calling. Instead, in his budget statement, he announced that the government would hold a consultation before Christmas:

Many of these scams relied on cold calling and high pressure sales techniques from boiler room operations. Some of the people on the receiving end of these scams lost their life savings. Their stories are heartbreaking.

A ban on cold calling in relation to pensions should be implemented as quickly as possible, with as much publicity as possible. The ban wouldn’t stop scammers from cold calling, but it would at least send out a clear message that such calls are illegal. No legitimate company would cold call you with financial advice.

The ban should be extended to cover email. And it should cover all financial advice, not just pensions advice.

Another step could involve tightening up the regulation of what companies are allowed to say about the investments they are offering. I recently wrote about a company called Property Frontiers in Oxford. In 2011, Property Frontiers made claims of “returns up to 895%” on its investments. Today, the investment is slowly unravelling.

A ban on on cold calling is only a small part of the action needed to address investment scams in the UK. Serious police action is needed to bring the scammers to justice. Some scammers have been jailed. Unfortunately, they are the exception.

Very large numbers of scam boiler room operations are targeting people in the UK. So far the authorities’ response to these scammers is what makes the UK part of the problem, not the solution, to addressing global investment fraud.

Published

One of the main questions I’ve kept asking is, why is it that the SIPP company that transferred my pension money to the scammers did so in full knowledge that the investments it was being transferred to were unregulated, and therefore probably a scam.

It appears that they don’t have the powers to refuse a transfer (I still think they could do more such as not providing the facility in the 1st place, especially given that they know the history of these types of investments, i.e. they’re invariably scams), this petition if successful would solve that issue, and give them the powers. I just wish that legislation was in place when they allowed the transfer my pension to a Biomass & Palm Oil investment that were scams right from the outset!

For 3 years I’ve been fighting and trying to seek justice in UK, the minimum universal human right against multiple British fraudsters. Action fraud is the biggest fraud in the world they never investigated or replied to my various reports. The British police don’t investigate frauds, I even complained to 2 chief constables, they close cases before it was opened and dismissed complaints without reading a word of it especially when you are foreign victim. The met must be rebranded the myth. FCA gave a copy/past answer “We cannot confirm that we are investigating…” mind boggling!. SRA a club membership protecting rogue solicitors. Legal, financial, property ombudsmen a bogus marketing device used by Crooks…Let’s not forget the so called self regulatory bodies, like AIPP and their scam awards.
I also complained to those hypocrites’ politicians Hammond and Swire as FCO ministers…they ignored foreign victims but they answered the Brits victims members of their constituencies. Definitely, the mentality of colonialism, pirates, privateers and opium sellers is still alive. They want to ban a cold call for the British pensioners…How about the foreigners who are victim of the British crooks?
Now what we call a country that has zero regulation, zero law and zero law-enforcement. A country where any ill-educated crook can set-up a scam and claim that investors are protected by those smoke and mirrors acronyms: FCA, SRA, AF, Met, Police, …?
Sorry to say it we call it a rogue country! And it has a new name: United Kingdom of Crooks