I’m surprised James didn’t delve further into the ramifications of the knife threat. This may or may not be theorizing or president but it is astounding the government admitted the threat – to what end?

1) Was it only a knife, as “they” say?

2) “Only” a knife, as a small threat, shaped like a wedge, later larger threats will follow.

3) If a knife is okay, next time they’ll bring a gun, and get away with it. Before you know it, entrapment under threat becomes legal and commonplace.

“Motive” or “intent” or “character” or the aberrations of an individual or group play such a role in these kind of events.
~ The victim was easily manipulated, hardly an aware self-determined individual.
~ The motives for the FBI with “career” brownie points, the government’s self-glory PR, the informant’s incentives to make this cruel con work…and other self-gain motives.
These “character flaws”, the lack of virtue and integrity, are the fundamentals which we battle.

Remember when the San Bernadino False Flag first hit, and how the only pics they showed of the male patsy had him smiling? Those pics were soon blurred and another, more sinister looking pic was trotted out for consumption.

Or back to the Mother of all False Flags, 9/11. Although proclaiming that they had no idea that could happen, within an hour or so, Bin Laden Inc was on the screen, with mug shots and full CV’s to give Americans, shocked and PO, someone to hate and the desire to get revenge on and we’ve been murdering our way to Hell ever since.