Blog

Class action lawsuit over government visa fees could be largest in Canadian history

At the centre are fees people from India, China and the Philippines paid for multiple-entry temporary resident visa applications.

The now federal court-certified lawsuit says the Government of Canada has been collecting more money through charging service fees for multiple-entry temporary resident visa applications than they actually spent to process and make decisions on those applications.

He and his wife became concerned when they learned of the alleged discrepancy between the fee and the service provided. Hinton said he decided to pursue legal action with an aim to help immigrants so they don’t have to pay more than even they can afford to.

“If the government is saying that they’re not supposed to make money off of this and they’re supposed to sort of be neutral, that they should honour that,” Hinton said.

WATCH: Foreign buyers class action lawsuit filed

Richard Kurland, Hinton’s lawyer, has been researching this case of overpayment of multiple entry visa applications for twenty years.

“Visas are needed if you’re coming from a country like China, India, Philippines to come visit Canada, or come work or study here,” Kurland said. “But what happened is that since 2004, the government charged too much.”

The lawsuit alleges an “illegal and recoverable profit was made by the Government” and asks as relief, among other things, that a partial financial refund of the fees paid be given to the people who paid the service fees.

Kurland said this isn’t a refund of taxpayer money, but that of foreign nationals, totaling anywhere from $40 to $60 per application.

Kurland says internal government cost studies he obtained through freedom of information requests show it did not cost $150 to process a visa application.

The fee has since been dropped to $100, but the government is still defending its actions.

“Their position now in court is that even if someone overpaid, we legally do not have to return overpayments and that’s a danger for Canada because the precedent will be set: if a person in Canada overpays the government for anything, the government doesn’t have to give it back,” Kurland said.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada declined to comment on the case.