Pages

Friday, November 28, 2014

Vaccines Don't Work: Malignant Mumps In MMR Vaccinated Children

A new study finds highly malignant mumps infections in those successfully vaccinated against the virus...

A provocative new study titled, "Epidemic of complicated mumps in previously vaccinated young adults in the South-West of France,"
reveals that the MMR vaccine, despite generating high rates of
presumably protective IgG antibodies against mumps, does not always
translate into real-world immunity against infection as we have
repeatedly been told. To the contrary, the study details cases where,
despite the detection of high levels of antibodies against the mumps
virus, patients contracted a malignant form of mumps that only rarely
follows from natural, community acquired infection.

We
live in a time when many medical interventions are decided not by the
weight of the evidence itself, but by 'science by proclamation,' i.e.
the public, and the regulatory agencies legally responsible for
protecting them, simply accept pleas to authority or vague references to
'the Science,' without any acknowledgement of the reality of how
vaccine research is manipulated or simply selectively published to serve
economic and socio-political agendas. For example, of the billions of
dollars (much of which is funded by you, the taxpayer) funneled into
proving vaccines safe and effective thus far, not a single published study exists to date that compares vaccinated subjects to non-vaccinated ones.
The obvious reason is that if the results of such a study demonstrated
better health or immunity in the non-vaccinated group (as many suspect),
the entire house of cards supporting our present-day, globally
coordinated pro-vaccine agenda would fall to pieces.

The
featured study in this article was conducted by a team of French
researchers, who discovered cases of complicated mumps in previously
vaccinated young adults. Complicated mumps refers to serious bodily
damage caused by mumps infections. Naturally occurring mumps, on the
other hand, is not known to cause permanent damage to those who are
infected through community exposure; to the contrary, it confers much
longer protection. The researchers affirm the normally benign trajectory
of mumps infections, stating: "Mumps is a usually benign pediatric viral disease caused by a rubulavirus, RNA virus of the paramyxoviridae family."

The report was based on a retrospective analysis of 7 cases of
complicated mumps managed during 1 year at the Bordeaux University
Hospital, France. The diagnosis was suggested by the clinical
presentation and confirmed using specific "Reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction," [RT-PCR].

The results of their investigation was reported as follows:

"Five
cases of meningitis [brain and spinal chord inflammation], 1 of
orchitis [inflammation of the testicles], and 1 of unilateral hearing
impairment were identified. Each of the 7 patients had been previously
vaccinated with MMR [the mumps, measles and rubella vaccine], 4 had
received 2 doses of this vaccine. Blood tests revealed high rates of IgG
antibodies, usually considered as sufficient for immunological protection, and every patient had at least 1 positive RT-PCR test for mumps."

The
emboldened statement above is instructive. Whereas the vaccine industry
and the FDA determines so-called 'vaccine efficacy' by proxy to
determine effectiveness, i.e. either through increased antibody titer
generation or through the 'gold standard' of the Plaque reduction neutralization test,
this does not always translate into actually protecting the vaccinated
individual from infection. In other words, this study reveals that real
world immunity against the target pathogen is not guaranteed by these
surrogate markers.To this point, the researchers acknowledge in their concluding remarks:

"Outbreaks of complicated mumps may still occur despite a broad coverage of MMR vaccination."

Clearly the MMR vaccine's utility depends only
on whether its benefits in protecting against measles, mumps and
rubella outweigh its harms. The possibility that it has contributed to
the explosion of autism spectrum disorders in the past few decades is
reason enough to give pause and re-evaluate its place in the vaccine
schedule, especially considering it has been linked in the biomedical
literature to 30 other serious adverse health effects.

It would be one thing if it actually worked as unilaterally presented to the public, but a recent Chinese study that found measles outbreaks were occurring in populations with 99% MMR vaccine immunization compliance.
Research like this shows that the risk side of the equation may far
outstrip its purported benefit to the hundreds of millions of children
worldwide who are either coerced (in countries that still have mainly
unexercised exemptions) or mandated into taking them.

Ultimately,
it is a parent's right and responsibility to decide whether their
children should participate in the CDC's immunization schedule, which
involves 49 doses of 16 vaccines by age six,
each vaccine of which contains multiple 'inactive' antigenic and/or
immunotoxic agents, e.g. preservatives, biological agents, adjuvants. We
encourage readers to use our free vaccine research portal or visit the National Vaccine Information Center
for updated information on both vaccine risks and your rights as a
parent to refuse enrolling your child in the one-size-fits-all
immunization schedule. Also, please bookmark Fearless Parent,
a cutting edge advocacy group and rich content platform that empowers
you with practical information with which to better inform your
choices.

Intellectual Center Reviews

Intellectual Center provides Independent News in blog format to assist other activists, teachers, and elders with alternative news, information on social issues, and research material.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Intellectual Center (Website) may post copyrighted material not specifically authorized in accordance with Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law allowing purposes associating learning processes. Please be advised if you intend to use such copyrighted material for personal reasons beyond "fair use," considerations, please obtain permission from the copyright owner. Learning processes encompass a vast array of issues of concern and would not be restrictive, it would offer critique and extended scholarly research.

Website may display third party authors/advertising which may not represent the views or opinions of Website or contributors. Advertisements are not endorsed as such and are intended as alternative ways to support the work at Website.