Letters by a modern St. Ferdinand III about cults

Plenty of cults exist - every cult has its 'religious dogma', its idols, its 'prophets', its 'science', its 'proof' and its intolerant liturgy of demands. Cults everywhere: Islam, the State, the cult of Gay and Queer, Marxism, Darwin and Evolution, 'Science', Globaloneywarming, Changing Climate, Abortion....a nice variety for the human-hater, amoral, anti-rationalist to choose from. It is so much fun mocking them isn't it ?

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

From E Coli to Yeast and Humans ?

This is science or just a bunch of dogmatic hooey ?

by StFerdIII

The cult of Evolution. Everything proves Evolution ! Funded by the state, embraced by Atheists as a 'scientific' rationale for ignoring reality, evidence, morality, and the uniqueness of being human. Fantastic fables are thrown up by the 'science' media which purportedly 'prove' evolution:

-98% of all species which have existed on this planet are now extinct. There are currently 2 million flora and fauna species. Ergo we have had 100 million total species on this planet, evolving from roughly 3.8 billion years ago, or 1 new species every 38 years. Yet in the past 5000 years of recorded history not one single new meta-mutation of a new species has been observed.

-Apparently the process of Lemurs becoming Humans took only 6 million years.

-Yet there has been no genetic changes within Apes in the past 40 million years.

-A small wolf 'evolved' into the whales in a few million years.

-Yet 2 Billion old Bacteria found in Chile and Australia prove that they have perfectly 'adapted' to their environment and have no need to 'evolve'.

-Not one single transitional inter-species and phyla form is available within the fossil record which now comprises some 100 million fossils worldwide. Zero out of 100 million.....

-Cambrian explosion of 540 mya, with 30 fully formed phyla, and not one single piece of evidence of any creature 'evolving' into any of the 30 phyla body forms from the pre-Cambrian. None.

Darwinism is obviously ridiculously inane and unscientific. It is funded by tax money to push Atheism and the cult of science [which the government will use to force unwitting citizens to follow what the Mandarins want, see the Nazi cult itself premised on Evolution, or the Communist cult another Atheist-Evolutionary fascism.].

Bio-chemically evolution is illiterate. One of the simplest single cell organisms is E coli, a bacteria which sits in the human stomach and helps with food digestion. It has about 470 genes and roughly 2600 nucleotide bases.

According to evolution the E coli or something similar 'mutated' by chance into other basic life forms such as yeast. This is a part of Darwin's fictitious 'tree of life' phenomenon. However, a 'simple' yeast organism has over 4000 genes and 10 times the nucleotide bases of the E coli. Not one single experiment, even given the vast hundreds of millions in the past 50 years wasted on the cult of Evolution's 'science', has even come close to changing E coli to a yeast. Adding 90% more genetic information to an existing species form, through chance, chaos, and 'environmental survival of the fittest' is not only mathematically impossible, it has never been observed, nor lab created. It is theological dogma.

Back to math. The probability of a single gene forming by random chance is zero [not a single lab or observation of this has been produced]; and the probability of a sequence of genetic material to combine and form proteins, made up of amino acids [from 20 bases], joined by peptide bonds [which can only form through dehydration of the loss of a water molecule] is likewise zero. There is no mathematically possible scenario in which natural chaos can produce the above. None.

If there is no proof whatsoever for the evolution of E coli to a yeast, what then of pond scum to a 100 Trillion cell human ? And consider why would E coli need to exist without the complexity of the human organism in the first place ? How would our stomachs evolve the need for E coli, or how would bacteria evolve to meet the demands of food digestion? Darwin's cult does not say.