Hi!
Is that a new linda test? IIRC I didn't got that warning before...
=====
$ linda -i ppracer_0.3.1-4_i386.changes
W: ppracer; The font ppracer-0.3.1/data/fonts/FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf in package ttf-freefont is considered to be a duplicate.
The font shown above is considered to be a duplicate of a commonly
available font.
W: planetpenguin-racer-data; The font /usr/share/games/ppracer/fonts/FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf in package ttf-freefont is considered to be a duplicate.
=====
Interesting I considered to split of this font when I made
ppracer_0.3.1-3, but decided against it. Allthough the font's look the
same (but the files are a bit different, and I don't know enough about
ttf's to find out why), and ppracer worked very well with the font of in
the ttf-freefont package I decided finally against a splitting it of:
$ ls -sh /usr/share/games/ppracer/fonts/FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf
88K /usr/share/games/ppracer/fonts/FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf
$ apt-cache show ttf-freefont|grep Installed-Size
Installed-Size: 2424
Split of 88KB (ppracer contains only that single font file, no more), to depend
on a 2.4MB package diesn't sound usefull to me. Any other opinion?
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
--
http://learn.to/quote/http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html