<quoted text>Did you? Nah, I am pretty sure you simply read the abstract and liked what you saw so you stopped there. Otherwise, you wouldn't have made this stupid comment:<quoted text>You see, because had you read the actual study cover to cover, which I just did since you brought it up.(Bet you didn't expect someone to do that?) You would have known that the very people who conducted the study presented in their conclusion OTHER valid reason's for the results they recorded- other than your beloved homophobes are closeted gay's.Here ya go, since I guess you missed it the first time you pretended to read it."Another explanation of these data is found in Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's (1983) theory of the role of anxiety and attention in sexual responding. It is possible that viewing homosexual stimuli causes negative emotions such as anxiety in homophobic men but not in nonhomophobic men. Because anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal and erection, this theory would predict increases in erection in homophobic men. Furthermore, it would indicate that a response to homosexual stimuli is a function of the threat condition rather than sexual arousal per se. Whereas difficulties of objectively evaluating psychoanalytic hypotheses are well-documented, these approaches would predict that sexual arousal is an intrinsic response to homosexual stimuli, whereas Barlow's (1986) theory would predict that sexual arousal to homosexual stimuli by homophobic individuals is a function of anxiety. These competing notions can and should be evaluated by future research. "

As I said before, I read the article in its entirety. Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's study looked at the impact of the anxiety produced from the threat of an electrical shock would have on the sexual responses of a small group of men. They theorize that some men had a sexual response to the possibility of receiving an electric shock.

Having had a penis all my life, I can tell you from personal experience that when I become anxious or frightened, the last thing that happens to my dork is for it to start getting erect.

Now this might not be the case for those few people who get excited by torture.

Now Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's study did not look at erections as it relates to visual stimuli.

Adams, Wright, and Lohr's study DID look at this connection.

Every good study tries to provide a possible theory (or theories) for the results they encountered. It provides a leaping-off point for future research.

But their article still stands as proof that heterosexual men who self-report a strong distaste for homosexuality may have a tendency to become sexually aroused when presented with visual stimulation of homosexual acts.

<quoted text>I've seen your response played out here going way back, if a straight person is on here questioning a gay person, then it plays out that they must be seeking out a gay person and desire to be gay....How childish.

How childish?????? It's actually SCIENTIFIC. 4 out of 5 vocal homophobes are secretly gay. Are you THAT ignorant of psychology???? Well adjusted males don't care.

KiMare wrote:<quoted text>Do you understand that you just proved that the issues isn't closeted gays in denial, but heterophobia hatred toward anyone who disagrees with calling ss couples married.Smile..

We really don't care what YOU call married same sex couples. Evidently something about it causes you great discomfort.... enough discomfort to write things that make you appear delusional, inflexible and psychotic.

<quoted text>Did you? Nah, I am pretty sure you simply read the abstract and liked what you saw so you stopped there. Otherwise, you wouldn't have made this stupid comment:<quoted text>You see, because had you read the actual study cover to cover, which I just did since you brought it up.(Bet you didn't expect someone to do that?) You would have known that the very people who conducted the study presented in their conclusion OTHER valid reason's for the results they recorded- other than your beloved homophobes are closeted gay's.Here ya go, since I guess you missed it the first time you pretended to read it."Another explanation of these data is found in Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's (1983) theory of the role of anxiety and attention in sexual responding. It is possible that viewing homosexual stimuli causes negative emotions such as anxiety in homophobic men but not in nonhomophobic men. Because anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal and erection, this theory would predict increases in erection in homophobic men. Furthermore, it would indicate that a response to homosexual stimuli is a function of the threat condition rather than sexual arousal per se. Whereas difficulties of objectively evaluating psychoanalytic hypotheses are well-documented, these approaches would predict that sexual arousal is an intrinsic response to homosexual stimuli, whereas Barlow's (1986) theory would predict that sexual arousal to homosexual stimuli by homophobic individuals is a function of anxiety. These competing notions can and should be evaluated by future research. "

Hey simple simon..... what would the homophobes be 'anxious' about? Are you really THAT dull that you can't see it's the same thing? Jesus Christ on a stick!

34. But if it were 43 or 44 would that mean your stupid argument is correct Jizzy? Would that mean we shouldn't allow marriage equality?How would a same sex marriage or a poly marriage hurt you Jazybirdy58?

I mean what are you here for? If it's just to get some dirt on Frankie, your doing a bad job of it and if you do get some dirt what are you going to do then jackass?

Would that prove that your idiotic argument is correct? I think not dummy!

<quoted text>Frankie, its all about credibility. You see Frankie, when you lie, about simple things such as a military career, and then being a geologist with 44 years of experience. How are we to know that you support marriage rights as you say that you do? No, Frankie you are just another troll that does not support marriage rights. You like to play the game, but you suck at it.

What you always forget when you get all silly-mad like this is a few things:

1. No one gives a sh!t except you if my story is true. Suppose it isn't? Whatcha gonna do then dummy?

2. You are an even bigger jackass troll than I, except you're stupid!

3. Let's say you catch me in a lie about my irrelevant to the topic life. Whatcha gonna do then jackass?

4. If you do get some dirt on me, so what? How does that prove you are not a hypocrite liar?

<quoted text>Did you? Nah, I am pretty sure you simply read the abstract and liked what you saw so you stopped there. Otherwise, you wouldn't have made this stupid comment:<quoted text>You see, because had you read the actual study cover to cover, which I just did since you brought it up.(Bet you didn't expect someone to do that?) You would have known that the very people who conducted the study presented in their conclusion OTHER valid reason's for the results they recorded- other than your beloved homophobes are closeted gay's.Here ya go, since I guess you missed it the first time you pretended to read it."Another explanation of these data is found in Barlow, Sakheim, and Beck's (1983) theory of the role of anxiety and attention in sexual responding. It is possible that viewing homosexual stimuli causes negative emotions such as anxiety in homophobic men but not in nonhomophobic men. Because anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal and erection, this theory would predict increases in erection in homophobic men. Furthermore, it would indicate that a response to homosexual stimuli is a function of the threat condition rather than sexual arousal per se. Whereas difficulties of objectively evaluating psychoanalytic hypotheses are well-documented, these approaches would predict that sexual arousal is an intrinsic response to homosexual stimuli, whereas Barlow's (1986) theory would predict that sexual arousal to homosexual stimuli by homophobic individuals is a function of anxiety. These competing notions can and should be evaluated by future research. "

<quoted text>Here are a list of people who post on this thread every single day atleast 3-15 times per day. These people claim not to be gay, yet they are OBSESSED with gay marriage. These people will be on this thread seven days a week, 30-31 days a month (28-29 in February) and 365 days a year (366 on leap years). You couldn't pay these people to stop commenting about gay marriage. These people are about one or two more times getting cut off in traffic from either hanging themselves, or being the lead story on the 5 o'clock news, and it's only this thread that keeps them going for the time being....atleast here they have something to live for. Without this thread the suicide rate in their respective cities/towns would be just a little bit higher. This thread is to them, as the White House is to the President.Frankie Rizzo approx. 82,000 comments about gay marriageKiMare 12,115 comments about gay marriagePietro Armando 3,538 comments about gay marriageFrankie Rizzo himself has almost 50% of the almost 200,000 posts on this thread. You can often find him posting 10-15 times in a row. TALK ABOUT OBSESSED!!KiMare is obviously a lesbian. This level of hate can only be bread from an inner hatred towards ones own self. She hates herself on a very dangerous level. The only way she can live w her true self is by bashing other gays as much as possible, and cutting herself on a daily basis. Don't be too hard on her.Pietro Armando was just dropped on his head as a baby one too many times.So don't be too hard on these people. After all they are the frontrunners to be America's next unabombers, movie theater terrorists, anthrax killers, etc. etc.Smile, snicker, chuckle, laughter,(I think u get the jist of it)

Well, the gist I get is that you keep re-posting the same item. Probably due to lack of creativity. And, you have still omitted my name. This is inconsiderate.

<quoted text>Baby, I'm an EXCELLENT social worker. Hardly went into it for the money or glamour. I'm particularly good at taking a person's train wreck of a life and putting them onto a much more successful course.The reward I get from my job is the satisfaction that I have positively impacted lives for over a quarter of a century.

What do you do? Take some mixed-up young men, and attempt to convert them to SSSB? Tell them that the real problem is that they're gay, and in self-denial?

<quoted text>The only lyrics I would add are:Sittin' on my Mac until two in the mornin'Screaming at those f*gs on the Topix forum!Scared that they are gonna find out that my secret hopeIs to have some of them over and play "drop the soap"!I'm not gay, I'm not gay!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.