Monday, September 8, 2014

NATO is officially DOA | The Undoing of US "Interventionism?" | US "interventionism" is cover for naked imperialism |

September 3, 2014 (Tony Cartalucci - NEO) - Russian journalist Andrey Stenin, missing for a month in Ukraine, has been confirmed dead.
He was part of a convoy of refugees fleeing the fighting in Ukraine's
eastern region when he came under artillery fire. The vehicle he was in,
along with several others, was destroyed, the occupants killed, and the
evidence covered up. Officers representing the regime in Kiev had
apparently rifled through the destroyed vehicles beforehand, collecting
evidence and looting belongings.

It is even suggested by Russian
sources that the regime in Kiev attempted to use Stenin as a bargaining
chip during negotiations, giving the illusion the missing journalist
was still alive. Killed by NATO-backed Neo-Nazi extremists
who seized power in Kiev during the US-EU engineered so-called
"Euromaidan," the subsequent civilian and journalist deaths are nothing
less than provocative crimes.Meanwhile, within the nebulous
territory of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), two American
journalists have also been purportedly killed - allegedly executed by
ISIS terrorists. Despite even many Western sources admitting the execution video of American journalist James Foley was staged,
and with the latest video depicting Steven Sotloff's execution
featuring the same fictional executioner, at the same location, using
the same props, the hysteria and justification for direct US military
intervention in Syria has reached a fevered pitch. US Governor of Florida Rick Scott, according to the Miami Herald, would boldly proclaim:

Here is what they need to
understand — Steve Sotloff was a Floridian, but more importantly he was
an American. If you attack one American, you are attacking all
Americans. Last week President Obama said that his Administration does
not at present have a strategy for dealing with ISIS — these immoral
evil people. I think I can speak for all Floridians and all Americans
when I say that the time for a strategy is now, and part of that
strategy needs to include destroying them.

Similar
politically-motivated calls for war with Syria were made in the wake of
Sotloff's alleged execution - again - even with it being widely
acknowledged that the videos of his and Foley's execution were staged.
Following America's logic, Russia could likewise declare the need to
deal with the "immoral evil people" who have seized Kiev under the
banner of overt Nazism in the wake of its journalists being captured
and/or killed by the regime.

ISIS Timing Impeccable If the Pentagon had an office
dedicated to starting wars, and were in particular looking to create a
war with Syria, it could not do a more effective job at corralling the
American people with fear and hysteria behind the cause of war better
than ISIS. With the NATO summit in Wales unfolding, ISIS' timing with
the alleged execution of a second US journalists, stokes the fires
conveniently just ahead of public decisions that will be made regarding
the military conglomerate's many conflicts raging around the globe.
Pressuring members to join a "coalition" will be all the easier with
Sotloff's alleged execution still making Western headlines. Simultaneously threatening Russia's
interests in Syria, while seeking to counter Russian opposition to its
agenda in Ukraine, strengthens NATO's hand - all thanks to ISIS'
impeccable timing. For the uninformed, if they had not suspected ties
between ISIS and the West's agenda before, they should now. Journalist-Slaying ISIS Created by US

The problem with the US using ISIS'
provocations to justify military intervention in Syria is that ISIS is
in fact the intentional, engineered creation of the US in the first
place.Another comment made in the wake of Sotloff's alleged death was by US Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen who claimed:

This atrocious and brutal act
shows that ISIL’s cruelty knows no bounds and that it has no respect for
human life. ISIL is a global terror group that espouses an ideology
that poses a grave threat to regional security as well as U.S. national
security interests both at home and abroad.

To undermine Iran, which is
predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to
reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the
Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is
Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah,
the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran.The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.

That "by-product" is ISIS. Through
America's own premeditated conspiracy to plunge not only Syria, but the
entire region into genocidal sectarian bloodshed - resulted directly in
the alleged murders of both Foley and Sotloff, not to mention tens of
thousands of Iraqis, Syrians, Lebanese, and many others. The "Interventionist's" Quandary Despite the US' direct culpability
in both Foley and Sotloff's deaths, at the hands of terrorist
mercenaries the US itself had organized, funded, armed, and to this day
perpetuate, it is using what appear to be staged provocations to simply expand its proxy war against Syria - including now, the prospect of direct military intervention. The difference then between Russia
intervening in Ukraine to stop the slaughter of its citizens, and the US
intervening in Syria to stop the slaughter of its citizens, is that
Russia did not create the regime in Kiev, and has bitterly condemned the
Nazi militants waging Kiev's war on its own people in eastern Ukraine -
where as the threat the US claims it is responding to is its own
documented creation.

The quandary those supporting
American "interventionism" face is the fact that it is not
"interventionism" at all. It is imperialism dressed up as
"interventionism." Crises and threats are intentionally engineered to
justify what would otherwise be unjustifiable, naked military
aggression, conquest, and socioeconomic geopolitical subjugation.

NATO's
stated goal is a Europe "whole and free," meaning, completely
consolidated under its mnemonic military conglomerate, while being
integrated under the special interests driving the supranational
European Union. While it poses as defenders of Ukraine against Russian
aggression, the truth is Ukraine was long ago embedded within Russia's
sphere of influence - speaking the same language, sharing a common
history and culture, and even at times throughout their collective
history, sharing the same borders.

It was the US that was admittedly behind Ukraine's
2004 so-called “Orange Revolution.” It was on record a US-engineered
uprising designed to install into power an anti-Russian regime that
would then tear Ukraine from Russia's orbit. The Guardian would admit in
its 2004 article, “US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev,” that:

…while the gains of the
orange-bedecked “chestnut revolution” are Ukraine’s, the campaign is an
American creation, a sophisticated and brilliantly conceived exercise in
western branding and mass marketing that, in four countries in four
years, has been used to try to salvage rigged elections and topple
unsavoury regimes.

Funded and organised by the US
government, deploying US consultancies, pollsters, diplomats, the two
big American parties and US non-government organisations, the campaign
was first used in Europe in Belgrade in 2000 to beat Slobodan Milosevic
at the ballot box.

While
the Guardian attempts to justify American meddling in multiple nations
as an attempt to “salvage rigged elections and topple unsavoury
regimes,” it is clear that the US was backing its own collection of
"unsavoury" actors and that such principles were nothing more than cover
for meddling beyond its borders. It is also clear that the so-called
"Euromaidan" was simply a clumsier, more violent version of the "Orange
Revolution," a continuation of America's desire to strip away Russian
influence along its own borders, surround, isolate, and eventually
absorb Moscow itself.

When America's "interventionism" is clearly nothing of the sort, and
instead poorly disguised imperialism, the US plays a dangerous game
claiming it can intervene in Syria to stop mercenaries it itself
created, while denying Russia the right to act along its own borders to
stop chaos also of America's creation.

Dangerous End Game

Not only is the West's "interventionist" narrative being strained to its
breaking point, but the sheer strategic and logistical realities in
both Syria and Ukraine, favor Russia over the West. Already, before
intervention, Russia is far ahead of the West in Ukraine, while the West
has floundered in its self-made Syrian quagmire for years.

Russia possesses obvious advantages involving any intervention in
Ukraine - including proximity, language, culture, economics, and many
sympathetic Ukrainians. Conversely, the US is reviled across the entire
Middle East, separated by thousands of miles, with language and cultural
barriers impeding any military operation it decides to directly take.
Additionally, Syria does not stand alone. It is backed by interests in
Lebanon, Iraq, and Iran. A similar arrangement in Eastern Europe in
support of Ukraine involves covert aid being sent by NATO via unwilling
members with strained resources.

Whatever
support NATO could wring out of its members, it already has, and it
clearly is not enough. Escalating such support will be difficult if not
impossible, and repeated claims of "Russian invasions" and staged
provocations like the MH17 catastrophe - now ignored almost entirely by
the Western media - appear to have a fatiguing effect both politically
and upon public opinion.

In the end, US "interventionism" is cover for naked imperialism.

Without
a real moral imperative, the West is attempting to sustain hegemonic
aspirations across the globe through deceit and staged provocations. It
is demonstrably a losing proposition. Amid the chaos it is creating
numerous cases for real interventionism - for Russia to deal with
literal Nazis along its border and for Iran and its allies to deal with
sectarian mercenaries and their state-sponsors along their borders - are
being created.

As the balance in global influence tips out of favor for the West, such
interventions may become a reality.

And while a declared "World War" may
never come to pass, what will effectively unfold will be a global
backlash against Western aggression underpinned by a true moral
imperative, pushing it back behind its borders and dismantling its
accomplices beyond them.

2 comments:

USA got put in the can with the UK-Israeli Paedophile Metzitzah B'peh Cultists and that brain dead Apartheid got us lots of Genocides of our own species and here we are to heal this criminally insane earth Homo Sapiens' out of control completely!

Lots of Genocides of our own species and here we are to heal this criminally insane earth Homo Sapiens' out of control completely ? ! USA got put in the can with the UK-Israeli Paedophile Metzitzah B'peh Cultists and that brain dead Apartheid got us what it is!