Dive into sources and further reading here: https://sites.google.com/view/sources-vaccines

Vaccines and their side effects are a hard topic to cover – we know we keep saying this, but this case especially, there were a lot of things to consider. You can’t blame people for being worried, so we wanted to take their concerns seriously.

Because it is impossible to cover everything there is to know about vaccines in a ten minute video our sources are extra extensive and explain a lot of aspects in more detail, with an extra focus on further reading.

So if you want to dive in deeper or have more arguments at hand for your next heated discussion, here you go.

If you want real safety information just read the vaccine insert. It will tell you all you need to know. Bring a magnifying glass though because they do not want you to be able to see this information.

The immune system develops its own antibodies. The vaccine claims to make antibodies too. This video says during the time antibodies form a lot of damage can be caused. First contradictionMost people don’t die from measles. The statistics for the vaccine reactions are not true. I know that it is a FACT that when you present to emergency rooms with a sick person post vaccine they are told it is not vaccine related. Vaccine reactions are denied! Not even investigated.When a person dies from measles is there other factors such as poor health care or other chronic health issues? Gut feeling, anecdotes? Observations and data collection is what has been going on!!! They end the video by putting down people who question the efficacy and safety of vaccines and thereby discrediting anything they had to say. By using insults to try to win a argument you prove yourself to not have an argument at all

_The immune system develops its own antibodies. The vaccine claims to make antibodies too_ No. The vaccine stimulates the immune system to make antibodies. _The immune system develops its own antibodies. The vaccine claims to make antibodies too_ In a real infection like measles, this is true. If the immune system encounters a new virus it will not have antibodies against it. To produce those antibodies, the immune system needs to analyse the virus, design antibodies, then make them in large numbers. During that time the body has to rely on it's other defenses (the innate system) which whilst immediately available, is not so effective. So the virus has a period where it can take a hold. _First contradiction_ No contradiction. _Most people don’t die from measles_ But some do; measles is so infectious that without vaccination you invariably get epidemics. In those epidemics maybe one person in ten thousand dies - but many more will be so seriously ill they will have to be admitted to hospital. Some will be left with permanent damage to their hearing or eyesight for example. In the United States, up until the late 1960's, 48,000 people were admitted to hospital due to measles every year, and 500 people died. Worldwide deaths were, in an average year, up to two million people. Measles was so common there was a joke about it - it joined death and taxes as being inevitable. Whatever, even mild measles is very nasty and leaves your immune system severely weakened and open to other infections, often for months. And of course, that is just measles. Vaccines protect against much worse things like polio. _The statistics for the vaccine reactions are not true_ and your evidence for this assertion is...? _I know that it is a FACT that when you present to emergency rooms with a sick person post vaccine they are told it is not vaccine related. Vaccine reactions are denied! Not even investigated._ Again, you evidence for this "Fact" is..? _When a person dies from measles is there other factors such as poor health care or other chronic health issues_ Sometimes yes, sometimes no. People died from measles despite being in good health and having good healthcare. There is no cure for measles.

I remember when I was told by a few not to vaccinate my child......I remember thinking "you got vaccinated and are alive and fine" it's heartbreaking to hear my little cosmic queen cry but I've always believed in science so she's going to have to deal and thank me when she's super old and getting to spend time with her great grand babies! 💖

Anti-vaxxers kill or weaken millions of kids not directly, but by weakening their health source. Fight against wrong information, if your friend is an anti-vaxxer, don’t believe them just because they are your friend. Believe what you think.

those kids who die should mean that our species will get some sort of immunity. the only example (rather grim) is of the European invaders spreading their diseases to Native Americans. Thousands of Europeans must've died from those disease before those with no immunity were mostly bred out of existence. But, they were carriers and I guess a few Europeans also may've had weak symptoms - most carriers can't spread a disease unless their are symptoms (coughing, sneezing, pustules and also active shedding of the virus vs . just having antibodies). But, why the WAY vaccines are offered is disrespectful: no brochures telling about a company' record, no choice or live, modified live, or killed vaccine. Usually no offer to only do one virus vaccine at a time vs. many at once. It's "Here, take this". We deserve more info. Most people can read these days and also access the internet to get more detailed info.

@Lechsi Z You wasted quite a lot of time and typing = only to reaffirm your ignorance of the science here. How about instead redirecting that effort into = learning the science........just a thought. Better luck next time. p.s. - Egyptologists are less worried about some mythical "long lost virus" = than they are about introducing new ones. Once a tomb is opened then the mummy should it contain one is subject to degradation from humidity and bacteria introduced into the structure. These things can rapidly break down the structure of the mummy to say nothing of its coffin should it survive. That is why Egyptologists work with archaeologists who are preservation specialists. They will assess a mummy and if needed reinforce its structure so as to try to preserve it with the least amount of damage. So handling mummies - which are organic in nature - without gloves or masks = can turn them into dust as the oils on your skin and the bacteria you introduce to their surfaces destroys the body.

@Vary Olla Viruses are not eradicated in all cases, nor is immunity gained i all cases. However, when scientists discover a new mummy or ancient body buried in ice for thousands of years, they wear masks and head to toe coverings to protect themselves against viruses from that era. A virus from an isolated group can die out, but one from a crowded area such as Egypt wouldn't as easily. So, those scientists must know that viruses aren't cut and dry- each is unique. Some viruses become much weaker over time - as happened in rabbits in Australia- but that can have good and bad consequences. You take as many vaccines as you like, and I'll take as few as I like. Over 60 years agio, science proved that some viruses, over time, have potential to cause cancers. Perhaps injecting them into our bodies intentionally could do the same. Some vaccines are cultured on eggs - ever heard of avian flu? What other avian diseases might there be that could be passed via vaccine then? We don't know what we don't know. And, you may want to watch or read more history on the medical sciences. It is rather scary what scientists thought was fact. I still remember the cholesterol scare when scientists were sure cholesterol from food was the main source of high cholesterol and it was unaware the other dietary sources. I remember when medical scientists thought other mammals couldn't feel pain or experience emotion. Science is run by humans, and all humans are prone to ego, greed, mental laziness, fear of their peer's opinions (peer review). I have to trust myself.

@Lechsi Z So you began with a nonsensical rationalization about evolution - which I showed was in error - to subsequently pivot to another nonsensical rationalization about "choice"..................did you honestly think I would not recognize the pivot???? LMAO!!! "Deflection" is a stereotypical - and childish - ploy which anti-vaxxers frequently try to employ to salvage a failing argument. Moral of the story: once upon a time before we had modern antibiotics = lepers were driven from their communities and forced to live apart given their potential infectibility towards others. That they may have desired a different outcome mattered not one whit. All that mattered was they posed a risk to the broader community..................so it is with vaccination measures. So in matters of public health = "choice" is not a viable excuse for inaction. When you enter the public space which is inhabited by all you do not have the right to potentially spread infectious diseases as a consequence of your poor choices. Instead you have an obligation - as all do - to take measures to mitigate the spread of infectious diseases. These measures include vaccination which both history and legal jurisprudence supports as reasonable in their methodology as well as efficacious in their effect. So your ignorance or incredulity is no more legitimate as a basis for argument as is your desire to parrot facile anti-vaxxer talking points here. Better luck next time. p.s. - animal vaccines are not equivalent to human vaccines which are much more rigorously regulated. Also I would not take my pet to a vet who believed what you claim here as they apparently slept through biology class..............which is probably why they treat animals instead of humans who would sue them for malpractice.

@Lechsi Z Just remember that if a doctor tells you to take some medicine, there is probably a very good reason for it, and even if you don't experience bad effects without taking it, there is still probably a very good reason for the doctor suggesting it. It is important for each of us to come to the consensus that we don't know enough about ourselves to make imformed decisions regarding these matters.

@Michael Baljet a close family member is a doctor: they believe what is in their textbooks. They are not encouraged to question anything or to create....merely to implement. A doctor told me to take an antibiotic before surgery. i didn't because i had no infection and was in great health. i was fine without his antibiotic and didn't have to suffer from a yeast infection. If YOU want to blindly be lead, go right ahead. Allow others to do as they will - with their own bodies. Pets and kids are different, of course - but even those aren't belonging to gov't/society/doctors.

Like most have said, there are two main reasons. 1. the symptoms of a common cold are so mild it would be a waste of energy and resources to develop immunity 2. the common cold is not caused by a single virus or bacterium, but rather many.

@Daniel Watkinson In the time before there was the MMR vaccine = in the US each year one used to see: 1 - millions of cases of Measles alone - remember that the MMR prevents 3 different illnesses. 2 - of those Measles cases each year tens of thousands would end up hospitalized. 3 - of those thousands would develop encephalitis. Encephalitis can result in neurocognitive impairments such as blindness, deafness, and cognition problems which can render the individual disabled for life. 4 - finally hundreds would ultimately die each year despite access to modern healthcare. 5 - meanwhile in the post-MMR vaccine world the incidence of Measles has dropped like a stone from millions of cases annually in the US to on average several hundred a year. Per VICP data which is public record = out of more than 100 million doses of MMR vaccine administered over a 12 year period from 2006-2018 a total of 130 cases were approved for compensation owing to the MMR vaccine. That works out to perhaps a couple dozen individuals a year who reacted severely enough to seek compensation from the VICP out of millions of doses. Moral of the story: so my opinion here is self-evident. People do not live in a vacuum magically protected from infectious diseases. Pathogens exist in nature and thus in human populations. Accordingly exposure is a forgone conclusion at some point with only how and where being in question. The only reason infectious diseases are not commonplace as they once were = is the cumulative impact of decades of vaccine usage which built up the herd immunity which reduces the likelihood of those outbreaks and subsequent exposure. So I support vaccines because history and the data conclusively show that vaccines reduce incidence of infectious diseases which in turn reduce health issues associated with those diseases as well as mortality rates. Infectious pathogens do not care what you believe. They exist to spread and replicate = period. As such we must mitigate their ability to do so and vaccines are the only public health measures with a documented capacity to do that on a wide scale. It only works however if everyone is on board. Enjoy your day. p.s. - epidemiologists estimate that for the 20 year period of 1994-2014 that vaccine usage in the US saved not only countless lives = it saved more than 1 trillion dollars in healthcare costs that would have otherwise been spent mitigating the infectious disease outbreaks that would have occurred absent vaccines to prevent them.

Vary Olla thanks so much for your advice and the valuable information you’ve provided, I’ll definitely bear it in mind. So to check I understand, your main point is that understanding is extremely important as it allows you anticipate and recognise occurrences in a greater depth and perhaps also with more accuracy? Understanding is also something that is ‘underrated’ by many people. If you don’t mind me asking, what’s your opinion on vaccines?

@Daniel Watkinson retired.............although I slept at a Holiday Inn Express. lol! My degree and career was spent in an applied science field. As such it enabled me to step back to see the totality of things rather than the all too often superficial approach so many today seem to prefer. Critical thinking is always your friend. Moral of the story: A+B=C - and this is where most folks stop. I however recognize that C can sometimes lead to D, E, and F. So do not endeavor to simply know "what" happens. Also seek to understand how and why things occur. Then you will be able to anticipate what can happen as well as recognize it when it does. If you learn how the human body works = you will understand how infectious organisms then impact the body. It is like with your car. If you understand how the engine functions then you can troubleshoot it when something goes wrong. Always look at the larger picture. Enjoy your day.

The biggest problem of this video is the fact that it has to exist. Not for the reason of teaching us curious and critical thinkers as to how vaccinations are beneficial, but rather trying to sway selfish and stupid individuals why not getting vaccinated is just plain harmful. At walmart they had to post signs in the household dept. to not drink the bleach. Folks, if you ever hear someone thinking about shooting bleach up their kids butt, do the world a favor and KILL THE MOTHER FUCKER! We might just raise the IQ of the human gene pool a couple of points.

I love the animations in this video. Here’s some stats you will find interesting:49% of people here eat shit processed food high in sugars and anti nutrients, get sick and blame the virus or disease instead of taking responsibility. Then they get drugs as a temporary fix. No wonder they love vaccines.49% of people here are sheep and follow the other 48%. If they say vaccines are good. It must be.2% of people here are Karen’s that take responsibility for their own health with a healthy diet of fresh organic veg so they don’t need drugs or vaccines to stay healthy.

@Uganda Knuckles yeah i also heard that he has killed multiple children to make vaccines and that they give you hepatitis b and i asked them how do they know and they said "because i said so" there is no way that they can possibly be wrong, they said so.

Vary Olla i just found the biggest boomer that posted a link to prove that bill and his nanobots is a thing. I ask em how they know its accurate then they say “its legit” and continue to tell me how its already happened in europe.

Conspiracy theories are the swansong of the failed intellect. As such the poor facile thinking moppets who react to online conspiracy theories are demonstrating for all they exist among the ranks of the intellectually and emotionally stunted rather than rational thinking beings. Better luck next time. lol! p.s. - on a side note the Gates Foundation supports science. It however is not the source of the information presented here which originates from credible science based sources. Enjoy your internet Matrix Neo. As noted by Nick = Fakebook, Twit-R, or Insta-Garbage is not reality.

@merch mad I dont have kids too but for myself, I will wait a little bit, then I will vaccinate myself, just a little skeptical of new and unproven vaccines. I will just wait, if things start to come up regarding the vaccine, then no. But if it looks ok after a couple months, then definitely.

Is that why you can’t get H1N1 (swine flu) twice? Because your body sees it as a very deadly virus and produces memory cells to protect against it from the future. I had the swine flu about a month before my sister had it back in 09 so I was already cured but I wasn’t infected again by her.

Yes - BUT - it also depends upon the severity of the infection. So exposure to a pathogenic organism will typically induce antibody formation after a time. As to how long you actually produce antibodies however is another story and falls into the realm of "immunogenicity". So your body will generate antibodies once the B-Cells "mature" in the dendrites of the lymph tissues. Sometimes however one will see the development of "affinity" B-Cells = or "memory cells". Those are what actually keep antibody production going forward for a long time - hence "lifetime immunity". So here is the "onion". Your dendrites = stimulus driven. In other words the more powerful the stimulus the greater the response. This means that a "mild" infection will produce antibodies - BUT - it may not generate affinity cells. As such your B-Cells will stop generating antibodies after a time resulting in you losing your previous immunity to a specific organism = antibodies are created to work against a specific set of antigens. If the antigens change - ergo a new strain arises - then the antibodies will not work and new ones must again be created. If sufficient affinity cells are not generated then as noted immunity will wane in time. Moral of the story: so the stronger the stimulus - or the more severe an infection - the greater the likelihood of affinity cells being generated resulting in immunity that can last many years. If however you only caught a mild case - or the strain involved is a mild one as different strains of Influenza come with different levels of virulence as it is not "one size fits all" - then immunity might wane in time. So H1N1 as it happens is one of the worst strains and thus if you were fairly ill with it you "should" still be immune. I would however recommend you not test this out. lol! It is always best to avoid exposure where possible despite previous exposures. Have a nice day.

Some people are not afraid of vaccines because of their side effects. Some people are afraid of vaccines because the pharmaceutical companies did a lit of shit and were never held accountable. I think this is an interesting point to debate which is often missed in discussions such as this.

The fuck are you talking about. I've looked into articles about the bill gates foundation from trustable sources, not idiots on Facebook or other websites like that, and there was no mentions of anything bad happening to kids there. Also, like the video said, vaccine cases where they are harmful are incredibly tiny, and the side effects are incredibly more tame then the diseases they prevent, such as measles or polio. So the likelyhood that anything bad happened is practically 0.

Don’t be silly! Look at what bill gates has done for all the helpless kids in Asia, his vaccine apparently helped 100’s of thousands through paralysis, any moron can easily look this up by searching on non biased search engines like duck duck go, so stop being so anti vax,.... baaaaaaaaa

I'm sorry but parents in developed countries who refuse to vaccinate their kids due to unfounded conspiracy theories are just selfish. The children are not your property, if anything they have been lent to you to take care of, regardless of your beliefs.

100% they have been lent to us by god to make sure we bring them up to be the best possible person by pumping them full of man made drugs not made by god instead of natural supplements found in natural foods made by god I’m with you

Yes there are = and they show that mixing vaccines does not in any fashion impair their efficacy. Also coincidentally a child from the moment it is born is subject to exposure to a host of different organisms at any given time. Infectious organisms do not politely attack you "one at a time". lol! Rather your immune system at this moment is probably keeping multiple organisms in check as you are colonized having been exposed to many different ones in your lifetime. Moral of the story: so children are vaccinated based upon relative risk. In other words vaccine schedules are created based upon risk of exposure and the science behind vaccine efficacy. As an example. Rotavirus poses the greatest risk to an infant during its first year of life as it can become seriously dehydrated necessitating hospitalization. If a 3 year old however gets Rotavirus then they may only end up with a tummy ache for a few days. So administering Rotavirus vaccine at birth is important as that is when the child is at risk. The Measles vaccine however does not reliably elicit immunity when given earlier than 9 months. As such it is typically given at 12 months and older as that is when the studies show it works the best. Now an infant younger than 12 months can certainly contract Measles if exposed. As such prior to that time it relies upon the cumulative herd immunity created by others who were vaccinated to help reduce that chance of exposure. So science dictates who gets what and when and administering multiple vaccines - which contain weakened versions of organisms or else pieces of them = concurrently still poses less risk compared to the actual full-blown illnesses the vaccines prevent. Have a nice day.