From the Department of Medicine (SJH, MDE, MAM, CSC), Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Cardiovascular Research Institute (SJH, MAM, CSC), University of California, San Francisco, CA; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine (LBW), Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Anesthesia (MDE, MAM, CSC), University of California, San Francisco, CA; Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (LY, PJ, CH, MLG, NLB), University of California, San Francisco, CA; and Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (MDE, MLG, NLB, CSC), University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Checking for direct PDF access through Ovid

Abstract

Objectives:The association between tobacco smoke exposure and critical illness is not well studied, largely because obtaining an accurate smoking history from critically ill patients is difficult. Biomarkers can provide quantitative data on active and secondhand cigarette smoke exposure. We sought to compare cigarette smoke exposure as measured by biomarkers to exposure by self-report in a cohort of critically ill patients and to determine how well biomarkers of cigarette smoke exposure correlate with each other in this population.Design, Setting, and Patients:Serum and urine cotinine and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine, urine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol, and hair and nail nicotine levels were measured in 60 subjects enrolled in an observational cohort of critically ill subjects at a tertiary academic medical center in Tennessee. Smoking history was obtained from patients, their surrogates, or the medical chart. Cigarette smoke exposure as measured by biomarkers was compared to exposure by history.Measurements and Main Results:By smoking history, 29 subjects were identified as smokers, 28 were identified as nonsmokers, and 3 were identified as unknown. The combination of serum cotinine and urine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol identified 27 of the 28 nonsmokers by history either as active smokers (n = 6, 21%) or as exposed to secondhand smoke (n = 21, 75%). All biomarker levels were strongly correlated with each other (r = .69–.95, p < .0001).Conclusions:The combination of serum cotinine and urine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol identified considerably more active smokers than did smoking history and detected a high prevalence of secondhand smoke exposure in a critically ill population. These markers will be important for future studies investigating the relationship between active smoking and secondhand smoke exposure and critical illness.