George Osborne tonight set out plans to fix Britain's housing market with beefed up powers for the Bank of England and "radical" planning reforms designed to help build up to 200,000 new homes.

In his annual Mansion House speech, the Chancellor set out how the Bank's Financial Policy Committee (FPC) would be able to order restrictions on the ratio of mortgage loans compared to borrowers' incomes, or to the value of their house.

He also announced proposals, likely to prove controversial, for an "urban planning revolution" which would see councils forced to pre-approve brownfield sites for housing developments.

The FPC already has powers to recommend measures including caps on mortgage loan-to-value (LTV) and loan-to-income (LTI) ratios to regulators, to head off the threat of a housing bubble.

Separate remarks from Bank of England governor Mark Carney signalled these were likely to be deployed within weeks, as he warned the property market was "showing the potential to overheat", with prices up 10% in the last year.

But Mr Osborne said it was important that the Bank was able to act "independently of politics" and take action by itself. The new powers are expected to be in place by the end of the current Parliament next May.

"We saw from the last crisis the dangerous temptations for politicians to leave the punch bowl where it is and keep the party going on for too long," he said.

The Chancellor added: "I want to make sure that the Bank of England has all the weapons it needs to guard against risks in the housing market.

"I want to protect those who own homes, protect those who aspire to own a home, and protect the millions who suffer when boom turns to bust."

Mr Carney welcomed the measures as well as a separate part of the Chancellor's speech in which he set out plans to clean up London's vast foreign exchange market, with new criminal sanctions for traders who engage in abuse and malpractice.

But shadow chancellor Ed Balls said: "George Osborne is still failing to tackle the root cause of the housing crisis which is that we are not building enough homes to match rising demand."

Mr Osborne used his speech to highlight the strength of the recovery, with Britain growing faster than any other advanced economy, record numbers in work, stronger business investment and a lower budget deficit.

But he said the dangers facing the recovery including an "old and very familiar risk" from the housing market, with the need to build more homes and the cycle of financial instability caused by high household debt.

Mr Osborne said there was "no immediate cause for alarm" with house prices still lower in real terms than they were in 2007, and the rate of mortgage approvals slowing in the last couple of months.

"But we need to be vigilant for there are things on the horizon that should give us some causes for concern," he added.

He pointed to soaring prices in London, now starting to spread out of the capital, with mortgage loan to income ratios at new highs.

"Could it in the future? Yes, it could, especially if we don't learn the lessons of the past. So we act now to insure ourselves against future problems before they can materialise."

He reiterated that the Bank "should not hesitate" to act on the housing market "if they think it necessary to protect financial stability".

Mr Osborne's proposals will strengthen its power to act either by putting a cap on LTI or LTV ratios or put in place limits on the proportion of higher ratio, riskier home loans that lenders can offer.

Earlier, Business Secretary Vince Cable told BBC Radio 4's Today programme he was "appalled" that banks were lending mortgages worth up to five times borrowers' salaries - and indicated a stable level was "three or three and a half times".

Last week, the International Monetary Fund called for the UK to take "targeted and timely" measures to clamp down on risky mortgages.

State-backed lenders Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group have already taken action to scale back high loan-to-income lending.

Elsewhere in the speech, Mr Osborne announced "radical steps" to reform planning rules, with the aim to provide permission for up to 200,000 new homes on brownfield sites.

He said: "This urban planning revolution will mean that in effect development on these sites will be pre-approved - local authorities will be able to specify the type of housing, not whether there is housing."

Under the plan, 90% of suitable land is expected to be covered by 2020 using these "local development orders" (LDOs).

It is intended to allow developers to start building sooner, saving them time and money. A £5 million fund will be set up to help local authorities create the first sites with LDOs.

The Government will also consult on new measures to enforce this approach, including allowing developers to apply directly to Whitehall if they feel councils have not done enough to remove planning obstacles on brownfield sites.

Mr Osborne acknowledged that previous planning reforms had been "hard-fought and controversial". Critics claimed the Coalition's national planning policy framework had left them powerless to stop damaging development in the countryside.

Comments (1)

There is only one practical way to put a stop to the idiotic housing 'market' developing balloon....tax at 100% all increase in the price of a house, asked by the vendor above what he paid for his house, allowing for inflation, costs of improvements etc over ..say..the previous couple of years.

For example, someone buys a house for 150k, does 25k improvements, inflation at say...3%, asking price when deciding to sell , 200k, an increase of 5250k, increase asked in sale 19750...tax ....19750k . that would soon burst any future bubble.

There is only one practical way to put a stop to the idiotic housing 'market' developing balloon....tax at 100% all increase in the price of a house, asked by the vendor above what he paid for his house, allowing for inflation, costs of improvements etc over ..say..the previous couple of years.
For example, someone buys a house for 150k, does 25k improvements, inflation at say...3%, asking price when deciding to sell , 200k, an increase of 5250k, increase asked in sale 19750...tax ....19750k . that would soon burst any future bubble.varteg1

Post a comment

Comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.