Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Shirley Kan
Specialist in Asian Security AffairsThis CRS report, updated as warranted, discusses policy issues regarding
military-to-military (mil-to-mil) contacts with the People’s Republic of
China (PRC) and provides a record of major contacts and crises since 1993.
The United States suspended military contacts with China and imposed
sanctions on arms sales in response to the Tiananmen Crackdown in 1989. In
1993, the Clinton Administration reengaged with the top PRC leadership,
including China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Renewed
military exchanges with the PLA have not regained the closeness reached in
the 1980s, when U.S.-PRC strategic cooperation against the Soviet Union
included U.S. arms sales to China. Improvements and deteriorations in overall
bilateral relations have affected military contacts, which were close in
1997-1998 and 2000, but marred by the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait crisis,
mistaken NATO bombing of a PRC embassy in 1999, the EP- 3 aircraft
collision crisis in 2001, and aggressive maritime confrontations (including in
2009).

Issues for Congress include whether the Administration complies with
legislation overseeing dealings with the PLA and pursues contacts with the
PLA that advance a prioritized set of U.S. security interests, especially
the operational safety of U.S. military personnel. Oversight legislation
includes the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for FY1990-FY1991 (P.L.
101-246) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2000 (P.L.
106-65). A particular issue is whether the President is required to issue
waivers of sanctions. Skeptics and proponents of military exchanges with
the PRC have debated whether the contacts achieve results in U.S. objectives
and whether the contacts contribute to the PLA’s warfighting capability that
might harm U.S. and allied security interests. Some have argued about
whether the value that U.S. officials place on the contacts overly extends
leverage to the PLA. Some believe talks can serve U.S. interests that
include conflict avoidance/crisis management; military-civilian coordination; transparency
and reciprocity; tension reduction over Taiwan; weapons nonproliferation; talks
on nuclear, missile, space, and/or cyber domains; counterterrorism; and
POW/MIA accounting.

Policymakers could review the approach to mil-to-mil contacts, given concerns about
potential crises and conflicts. U.S. officials have faced challenges in
gaining cooperation from the PLA. The PLA has tried to use its suspensions
of exchanges while blaming U.S.-only “obstacles” (including arms sales to
Taiwan, FY2000 NDAA, and air and naval reconnaissance operations).

The PRC’s harassment of U.S. surveillance ships (in 2009) and increasing
assertiveness in maritime disputes showed some limits to mil-to-mil talks
and PLA restraint. Still, at the Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&ED)
in July 2009, President Obama called for military contacts to diminish
disputes with Beijing. The U.S. articulations in 2011-2012 of a strategic
“rebalancing” to Asia (or “pivot” to the Pacific) raised an issue of how
to deal with China’s challenges. The Administration’s “rebalance” entails
not only an expansion of engagement with the PLA, but also increasing
exercises. The Defense Secretary visited in September 2012 and invited the PLA
Navy to participate for the first time in the U.S.-led maritime exercise,
RIMPAC 2014. The PLA Navy’s potential participation at RIMPAC near Hawaii
has raised concerns in Congress and elsewhere. The U.S. Navy has started
to increase some “interoperability” with the PLA Navy.

In 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013, the Obama Administration was late in submitting
an annual required report on security developments involving the PRC,
cooperation, and mil-to-mil contacts. Legislation in the 113th Congress includes the
FY2014 NDAA (H.R. 1960 and S. 1197), FY2014 Defense
Appropriations Act (H.R. 2397), and FY2014 Department of State, Foreign Operations,
and Related Programs Appropriations (S. 1372).

For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card
number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail
or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processin