Students enjoyed Professor Hasenkampf's enthusiasm during lectures and found her notes and test guides quite helpful. Her thorough explanations and examples made lectures enjoyable. However, some felt that she spoke rather quickly, while others would have liked it had she included more diagrams in her lecture notes.

Many students in Professor Hasenkampf's class claimed that she was the best professor they had ever come across; she made their first year memorable by being engaging, funny, and high spirited. She was very interactive and gave great examples to help clarify the material. Nonetheless, students would have appreciated it had she posted her lecture slides prior to class.

Professor Hasenkampf was very enthusiastic with the course materials and explained to students in a very thorough, yet fast-paced manner. Students felt that more time could be spent explaining more complex aspects of the course and that Professor Hasenkampf could do more to become approachable to students. The labs, although sometimes fun, were found to be ineffective and time consuming. Labs could become more relevant by highlighting what is in the course curriculum and what was taken up in the lectures. Laboratory reports should be marked and handed back before the submission of the next one to enable students to see their mistakes and correct them.

Professor Hasenkampf used very detailed models and examples to communicate the information during her lecture. Students felt that the content of the lecture should be provided before the class either online or in the library. The use of the study guide really benefited students and the book was deemed useful as well. Students felt that the lab should have a higher mark weight to correspond to the work that is required.

Professor Hasenkampf showed great enthusiasm, so it was evident that she really enjoys what she teaches; as a result, students found her lectures very interesting, and enjoyed coming to class. Although she tends to speak quickly, she explains concepts clearly, and uses good examples and visual aids to help enhance students' comprehension of the material.

Dr. Hasenkampf communicated her enthusiasm for course material well. She used applicable examples that helped the class understand the concepts she was trying to get across. Students also appreciated visual aids (pictures, stockings) and text references. Although the pace of lecture was found to be challenging, study guides for students helped define models that were important to success in the class.

Overall, students thought Professor Hasenkampf was such an enjoyable and passionate instructor that students were willing to attend classes at 8 AM. Her lectures were organized, and she clearly stated the course expectations and also her expectations of students. In addition, her exams were marked fairly. However, most students thought the labs were very time-consuming and resulted in a heavy workload.

Many students felt Professor Hasenkampf is an asset to the University of Toronto teaching faculty. She communicates course material both creatively and enthusiastically. Students enjoyed the lab itself, and appreciated its importance to understanding course material better. Students also appreciated the online availability of the lecture, as that material can be quite heavy.

Most students found the labs in this course to be very interesting and a great way to apply the course material, although some found them to be too lengthy and suggested improvements to make them more organized and structured. Some found that the teaching assistants did not provide sufficient guidance regarding the lab experiments and grading schemes. Many students also indicated interest in learning more molecular techniques during the labs. Many commented on the use of Powerpoint slides in some lectures. Most of the class noted that the use of overheads and the blackboard throughout class made the lectures more interactive. Regarding the midterm exam, students indicated preference for more short answer questions rather than multiple-choice questions that are worth a lot of points. Nevertheless, most students noted Professor Hasenkampf's high level of enthusiasm and energy. Many found her to be helpful and approachable. In the words of a student, 'The Professor'made it worthwhile to come [to lecture] at 8 am in the morning.'

They found Dr. Hasenkampf to be an enthusiastic professor and found her lectures to be engaging. She was very approachable especially during office hours. Students found the course to be challenging because of the intense lectures and lab component. Though time-consuming and tedious, most students enjoyed their lab experience in Genetics. It enabled them to relate to the genetic concepts taught in class. Some felt that they would benefit from a clearer marking scheme for the lab.

The students requested that the lectures should focus more on the assigned problems from the textbooks and not so much on theory. The midterm was deemed too difficult and this discouraged many students. Some students suggested the course could benefit from the introduction of tutorials. Professor Hasenkampf herself was widely appreciated in this course.

Professor Hasenkampf was very friendly and enthusiastic about her material. Students enjoyed the laboratory component and felt it could have been worth more of the overall grade. Use of Powerpoint slides in lecture was also suggested. Although the material was interesting, the methods of evaluation were a little intense, such as the lab component combined with exams and tutorials placed a heavy workload on students.

Dr. Hasenkampf communicated her enthusiasm for course material well. She used applicable examples, that helped the class understand the concepts she was trying to get across. Students also appreciated visual aids (pictures, stockings) and text references. Although the pace of lecture was found to be challenging, study guides for students helped define models that were important to succeed in the class.

Students praise Prof. Hasenkampf as a very enthusiastic professor who teaches very well, by making learning fun and valuable. The small classroom size for this course was very good for each student to get individual attention. Students found the material they studied useful for research papers and very appreciative of Prof. Hasenkampf's excellent teaching skills.