garethcoker said
Hopefully the next step will be a library purge. Long overdue. It would be awesome if the same standards that are being applied to current items be retroactively applied too to older items.
I’m certain that not everyone will agree with me on this though

I totally agree with that Gareth. I can never decide whether I should delete a load of my earliest tracks so I’d love it if someone else could make the decision for me. Not because I’m lazy, just because the composer always (or maybe not always? I do!) has a personal attachment to their music.

I love that they are rejecting more tracks because it means that when my music is approved, it is of high quality and is viewed as good enough to compete with all the other outstanding items being uploaded lately. It lets me know I must be doing something right

I am very grateful to the many reviewers. When my tracks were rejected the reviewers are explained to me in what my mistakes. It helps me to learn to compose better music! Requirements for the quality increased, so every time when my track passed on AudioJungle, I’m happy about that!

Post Reply

<strong></strong> to make things bold
<em></em> to emphasize
<ul><li> or <ol><li> to make lists
<h3> or <h4> to make headings
<pre></pre> for code blocks
<code></code> for a few words of code
<a></a> for links
<img> to paste in an image (it'll need to be hosted somewhere else though)
<blockquote></blockquote> to quote somebody