In Gəʿəz, pronominal suffixes
on transitive verbs typically denote adirect object, i.e. a noun in the accusative case. To review the direct object, have another look at the entry on the accusative
case. [If have difficulty viewing the Gəʿəz script on your browser, you may view this blog entry by clicking here.]

Oftentimes, as in
Aramaic / Syriac, these suffixes will anticipate an object which appears later in the sentence, prefixed with the la- preposition. Lambdin
terms this the “qatalo la-nəguš construction.” This type of anticipatory-suffix
infuses the object with greater specificity and definiteness. Note
that, in this construction, the object affixed with
the la-
is not marked in the accusative case.

ሐነጸ፡ንጉሥ፡ሀገረ።àሐነጾ፡ንጉሥ፡ለሀገር።

ḥanaṣa nəguš hagara // à hanaṣo nəguš lahagar//

The king built a city. à The king built [it,] the city.

ተርጐሙ፡ዛተ፡መጻሕፍተ።àተርጐምዋ፡ለዛቲ፡መጻሕፍት።

targʷamu zāta maṣāhəfta // à targʷaməwwā lazāti
maṣāḥəft //

They translated these books. à They translated [them,] these books.

The pronominal suffixes are, for the most part, fairly easy to spot and decipher.
Here’s a general overview of how they appear

singular

plural

3rd masc.

-o

-ኦ

-omu

-ኦሙ

3rd fem.

-ā

-ኣ

-on

-ኦን

2nd masc.

-ka

-ከ

-kəmu

-ክሙ

2nd fem.

-ki

-ኪ

-kən

-ክን

1st com.

-ni

-ኒ

-na

-ነ

Some predictable
phonetic changes occur to accommodate the 3rd person suffixes.
Importantly, a helping “-h-” appears if they are affixed to stems ending in –ā.
If they are affixed to stems ending in –u or -ə, they appear beginning with -əww
and -əyy, respectively, so: