Hypothetical: Petroniusite- The misery drug in the food chain

What is known is often no more than going through the motions of obtaining knowledge. | Source

By 2020, GM organisms had become big enough business to be
worth the time of corrupt people. Studies were suppressed or promoted. One of
the most controversial was Petroniusite, a crop spray used as a joint pesticide/herbicide/fungicide.
This was a universally popular spray. It was cheaper than its predecessors, and
easier to use, having long term residues. It was quite economic, and "bank balance friendly" according to
the agribusiness industry.

The controversy was academic. One of the ingredients, a
sulfate, was known to suppress the development of several amino acids,
including phenylalanine, one of the amino acids involved in happiness in
humans. Some wit at the makers of Petroniusite, when informed of this fact,
said “So it makes weeds unhappy. So what? There are no human side effects.”

That fact went largely unchallenged until a couple, one a
psychiatrist and the other a botanist, started arguing the merits of chemical
sprays. Starting with the effect of food on psychological states, they argued
until they came to a point of agreement about metabolism, if not much else. If
a food contains residues of a spray, does that spray remain active when
ingested?

The short answer was they didn’t know. In theory it could
happen, but nobody, including their old lecturers, could say positively. The
other problem was that any chemical going into the digestive system has to
survive the digestive system. Proving anything one way or the other was likely
to be difficult.

The difficulty of the subject was enough to get them more
interested. The psychiatrist was interested in the possibility of psychoactive
elements in the metabolism. The botanist was interested in what looked like a
way of doing much more thorough analyses of crop sprays than had been possible
in the past. They were too interested in their idea to stop at a non-answer.

Obviously, they needed to run some tests. The easiest way
for them to study a spray was, naturally, to get some Petroniusite. They
weren’t too sure if they even knew what they were trying to prove, at this
point. A biologist friend, intrigued, agreed to run some tests on mice to see
if Petroniusite did remain active, and there were any actual metabolic changes,
in mice.

The psychiatrist said that if Petroniusite was psychoactive,
it would show in standard tests for serotonin and other psychoactive hormones,
and in urine tests. The botanist said that the concentrations were important,
because by now they also had a few questions about the metabolism of sprays.

The biologist was also interested. Standard testing always
has a few critics, and this biologist was one of them. The biologist’s
perspective, put simply, was that if you don’t look for anything but standard
findings, you don’t find anything else. As far as the biologist knew, nobody
had ever checked for psychoactive chemistry in crop sprays, anyway, so the test
would be good for a paper, at least.

Petroniusite had another positive as a testing agent. Its
structure was very well known. It was a standard agricultural chemical, and
there was endless information available from government authorities and the
industry itself. The test bases were also standard, so the biologist, trying
not to merely run through the previous tests, invested in some other testing
processes.

One of the long term problems with GM organisms in the early
days was that a lot of products came on the market without generational
information. Products were invented and marketed and short term testing was the
basis for approval or disapproval, and that was quite literally the whole
story. That was one of the reasons that the biologist was a critic of standard
testing. It was unlikely that things which were going to persist in the
environment for generations were that simple, or that their effects had even
been measured.

It took the biologist a little while to explain the idea to
the psychiatrist and botanist, but when they got the idea, they agreed. Both
felt that generational studies would provide more value anyway, so they agreed
to a two year study. That’s quite a few generations of mice, and any patterns
would be much clearer. (The risk in any form of testing is anomalies. Some
results in individuals can be quite misleading.

They didn’t need to wait long. The biologist had some quite
odd data from the first generation of mice.

“We’ve got depressed mice,” said the biologist.

“What, all of them?” asked the psychiatrist.

“All of them, in various degrees,” said the biologist.

Some mice were also behaving a bit differently. They were
friendly to each other one minute and incredibly hostile the next. Some mice
stayed away from the others. One was shivering. They definitely didn’t look
like happy mice.

“Is this the Petroniusite effect we were talking about?”
asked the botanist.

“It’s the common factor. The control group were fed the same
food, but without Petroniusite, and they seem normal enough.”

The physical tests showed very variable hormonal results,
and were so complex even the biologist didn’t quite understand them. Serotonin
levels in the group were all over the place. Phenylalanine and its breakdown
products were almost absent. One other startling result was evidence of a lot
of adrenalin being produced. Stress hormones were present in all mice at
different levels.

The biologist had misgivings.

“These mice may not be able to breed. They’re acting pretty
strange, and there’s been no mating behavior.”

They didn’t. The mice had to be separated, and most died
soon after. The generational testing wasn’t going to happen. The biologist, in
desperation, asked a well known critic of Petroniusite to check his results.
The critic, a professor, said the tests seemed OK, but suggested that a neutral
party, someone other than himself, be engaged to verify the results, because he
was too well known as an anti-Petroniusite advocate to get much more attention
on the subject.

The new tests duplicated the results, almost to the letter,
and went a lot further. The French testers said that the Petroniusite levels in
the mice were constant. The chemical itself wasn’t being metabolized or
breaking down.

A paper was produced, and instantly rejected by the makers
of Petroniusite, who stated they had a lot of healthy mice to prove otherwise.
Far more importantly, major labs also duplicated the original tests, and got
the same result.

It was now three years later, and the final findings on
Petroniusite looked pretty innocuous at first reading:

Petroniusite not metabolized in murine tests

Extensive testing has indicated that the common crop spray
agent Petroniusite is not broken down in mice when ingested and remains active
in the gut. Hormonal effects (Smith et al, Science Eternal, Petroniusite pp
1999555) are pronounced. It is unclear whether similar effects occur in
humans…..

Forty years later, Petroniusite was withdrawn from the
market as a chronic depressant in humans, linked to bipolar disorder and
schizophrenia, and a danger to children and adolescents. It took that long to
prove that Petroniusite was actively destroying phenylalanine and related amino
acids in people.

Those 40 years were spent arguing the merits of a chemical
people were eating on a daily basis. All the controversy and criticism about Petroniusite achieved nothing until these findings were finally made irrefutable.

No, the scientific process isn’t perfect. It can’t do
anything in a hurry.

Comments

No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.

sending

AUTHOR

Paul Wallis

7 years agofrom Sydney, Australia

Very true Tom, and this piece is based on some known factors in existing technology.

Tom Cornett

7 years agofrom Ohio

We are risking our very future on the flow of money and the growth of irresponsible technologies.

Another great hub.

AUTHOR

Paul Wallis

7 years agofrom Sydney, Australia

The only thing these guys notice is a lawsuit between the eyes. Their own nervous systems seem to be immune to sentience, as well as any concept of paying attention to what they're doing at any given moment.

Hello, hello,

7 years agofrom London, UK

Very intering eye opener. Maybe that is the answer to so many unstable youngsters and people. The chemical industry has a lot to answer for but who will mkae them?

joie

7 years ago

I meant to add there should be this type of study done on all pesitcides.

Joie

7 years ago

Excellent point! It may explain why more people are taking anti depressants now, than before petronuinsite has been used on crops.

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)

Google AdSense Host API

This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

Facebook Login

You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)

Maven

This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.

Conversion Tracking Pixels

We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics

Author Google Analytics

This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)

Comscore

ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)

Amazon Tracking Pixel

Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)