Web Only /
Views » October 18, 2011

Our Time Is Now

Email this article to a friend

your email

your name

recipient(s) email (comma separated)

message

captcha

An ongoing critique of corporate capitalism, like the kind In These Times has been engaged in for 35 years this month, helps foster rare moments like these, when our uncompromised ideals can be put into action.

For the past several months, a dear family friend has warned me that the left must stop its griping about Barack Obama–for not standing up to Republicans, for not being a champion for everyday Americans, for failing, as Susan Douglas put it in her October column, “to grow a pair.” He argues that such negativity will pave the way to a 2012 electoral defeat and the election of a Tea Party-beholden president.

His point is not that the substance of our critique is wrong, per se, but that we must accept this affable one-time Senator from Illinois for who he is, a man with a “deep-seated aversion to conflict” and a “profound failure to understand bully dynamics” (to quote Emory University professor Drew Weston).

When Obama’s public approval rating among his liberal base started to tank this past summer, I began to think my friend was right. Were we forming a circular firing squad?

In her infamous October Nation column, Tulane professor Melissa Harris-Perry blames Obama’s ratings fall on “liberal electoral racism” as exhibited by white liberals’ “willingness to abandon a black candidate when he is just as competent as his white predecessors,” like Bill Clinton. But the problem with Harris-Perry’s reasoning is that progressives didn’t bust their butts in 2008 to elect another Bill “Triangulator” Clinton. They voted their hopes.

When you understand that, perhaps it would be more accurate to say–and for Harris-Perry to admit–that Obama’s falling poll numbers reflect his failure to measure up to his one-time fervent supporters’ minimal expectations.

Apparently Obama must think the same, for in the past several weeks Obama-the-vacillating president seems to have rediscovered Obama-the-combative candidate–as he pushes for his jobs bill or as he openly calls for higher taxes on the wealthy. So progressives should give themselves credit: Without their critique, the low-key Obama would have likely remained on his losing trajectory.

In 1979, when explaining his refusal to engage in third party theatrics and to support Democratic candidates, the great American democratic socialist Michael Harrington–a founder, with Irving Howe, of the Democratic Socialists Organizing Committee, which later merged with The New American Movement to become the Democratic Socialists of America–told a reporter: “We want to be on the left of the possible.”

But the line between staying true to our ideals and taking pragmatic action is a hard one to walk. Just as the perfect can be the enemy of the good, pursuing the possible can prevent us from dreaming the impossible.

One year ago, it did not seem possible that Egypt’s president Hosni Mubarak would be ousted in the Arab Spring. A few months ago, we wondered where the progressive counterpart to the Tea Party was. Today, we have Occupy Wall Street, a movement whose example is inspiring similar “occupy” movements across the country, from Seattle to Atlanta. And now, President Obama is explaining to the clueless media establishment that the protests reflect “broad-based frustration about how our financial system works.” Folks, the lesson here is that the prospect of organized social discontent commands the attention of political elites.

An ongoing critique of corporate capitalism, like the kind In These Times has been engaged in for 35 years this month, helps foster rare moments like these, when our uncompromised ideals can be put into action.

An oft-told story of the New Deal recounts Franklin Roosevelt telling his impatient supporters: “I agree with you, I want to do it, now make me do it.” This could be our time to make Obama live up to his promises.

If Occupy Wall Street continues to grow, its calls for a more just and democratic system may force Obama to be the president we hoped he would be.

Whether that happens or not, In These Times will still keep reporting from the left of the possible, until the possible moves left.

So you champion the views of a socialist. You know, socialism is great until you run out of other peoples money to spend, just ask Greece.Posted by Andrew Whi on 2011-10-19 11:01:14

"This could be our time to make Obama live up to his promises."
That would be political suicide, and Obama is at least bright enough to know it.
Obama's far-Left "signature legislation," Obamacare, is the single most significant factor in the sinking of his presidency. The huge tax increases implied by his "cap and trade" proposal were rejected not only by Americans in general but by his own party, as was his latest tax-and-spend bill disguised as a "jobs bill."
Progressivism is founded on an unrealisable ideal of unconditional altruism; American society--most societies--have at their core what's called "reciprocal altruism," the expectation that things done to benefit some at the expense of others will, over time, on the average, be reciprocated. Some behaviourists believe this is so fundamental an expectation that's it's affected human evolution over the last 50k or 100k years.
Progressivism, however, seems to assert that no reciprocation is necessary, that those who can benefit others are obliged to do so with no expectation of reciprocation--and if they're not willing to do that, should be compelled to do it. This cannot work. Not in the long run. People, most of us, just don't think that way.Posted by HenryMiller on 2011-10-19 09:17:52

Joel, when are you going to come out foursquare against the anti-Semitic elements of Occupy Wall Street? The signs...the commentary?
What's the matter, Joel? Hypocrisy got your tongue?Posted by Jack Davis on 2011-10-19 07:58:03

Melissa Harris-Perry blames Obama’s ratings fall on “liberal electoral racism”
Sorry but Ms. Harris-Perry is a self parody of a grievance seeker. When you look at everything through the prism of racism you invariably see it.Posted by bandit on 2011-10-19 07:04:41

Nic's comments are a little rough but he's right.
The bigger the State, the more incentive there is for money and elitism to corrupt. The US Federal Govt spends $10 billion a day, every special interest group and rent seeker wants a piece of that.
The State relies on force. Conform or pay a fine. Pay your fines or go to jail. Pay your taxes or go to jail. Could an institution that relies on force be trusted to dispense 'justice' or 'fairness'?
Socialism is defined as the means of production owned by the State and controlled by the State. Fascism is defined the means of production owned by corporations/individuals but controlled by the State. The State ALWAYS looks after it's interests first, it's sponsors and benefactors second, the voters third and the disenfranchised last.
If the disenfranchised are looking for the government to solve problems, they'll likely be disappointed. If the government did decide that it was in it's self-interest to act on behalf of the protestors, is using the State as a coercive proxy to force other individuals to conform to the protestors preferences a just solution?
Oh yeah, I just read an article that DC has now passed Silicon Valley as the wealthiest metropolitan area in the US. Sound about right?Posted by B Canuck on 2011-10-19 06:49:17

What are you smoking? Obama is an evil, authoritarian warmonger, torturer, grand thief, rapist, and con-artist. Wall Street provided the bulk of his campaign donations. He serves the corporations and elites, just as Bush I & II did and Clinton did. Democracy is evil, it is simply the majority dominating the minority and individuals. What we need for true justice and equal opportunity is free market anarchism, a private free market where individuals, families and businesses can transact, trade, live and work in a voluntary, peaceful and non-coercive society based on self-ownership, individual rights and property rights. Obama is a corporatist-elitist whore.Posted by Nic Leobold on 2011-10-19 03:08:51