Essay Eminent Domian

The urban economy has become increasingly competitive. As a result, economic development projects have made priority on the agenda in many cities. Because today’s top issue in cities is jobs, politicians are using eminent domain powers to create jobs and businesses. Hulen describes eminent domain as the seizing of private property by the government without the consent of the owner. National and local governments are using the power of eminent domain to create recreational infrastructure to entertain visitors versus factories that would provide resources to its immediate residents – the impoverished. Consequently, the working-class and small homeowners’ civil liberties are being abused at the expense of the wealthy.
State governments should impose strong limitations on the ability of cities to use eminent domain powers for economic development purposes. Homeowners – usually politically unprotected city-dwellers- are having their houses apprehended with the main beneficiaries being the wealthy and the homeowner receiving inadequate compensation. The government has expanded the power of eminent domain for multiple purposes – even though the constitution only allows eminent domain for “public use.” It has allowed the eminent domain power to be applied to various political figures and situations. (Wasserman 245) The practice is unconstitutional. It has created many problems as Kelo v. New London 2005 exemplifies. The practice is not only unconstitutional, but unethical. There should be regulations for eminent domain on the local and federal level to serve as a type of protection from this corrupt power.
Eminent Domain victimizes the vulnerable. Seized homes are mainly in the cities. Statistics show that most homeownership is not in the cities, but in suburbia. These homeowners have more of an incentive to vote for policy than the city-dwellers. (Koehler 2008) Because the city-dwellers do not have much incentive to vote, they are not politically active, thus making them politically underrepresented. They lie defenseless to all policy as their voice is silenced. Although politicians did not personally disenfranchise this population, they are taking advantage of the population’s muteness.
Moreover, takers are not adequately compensating the owners. “The fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires that whenever privately owned land is taken by the government under eminent domain, ‘just’ compensation must be paid.” (Miceli 359) However, as Daniel Kelly explains, private parties that directly profit from taking can largely benefit from while paying little for acquired properties. Such is a very serious problem. Mandelker goes as far as to say that “no constitutional problem has proved more contentious in land use regulation than the taking issue.” Furthermore, “evidence from urban renewal supports the hypotheses that, due to the structure of court costs, high-valued properties receive more than market value and low-valued properties receive less than market value as described by Munch. Basically, the wealthier benefit more from eminent domain while the poor suffer from this power. The current system in which eminent domain compensation is distributed is unjust.
There are three ways that Takers minimize compensation. The first is that they avoid high-subject-value properties. The second is they allocate most compensation in the form of relocation assistance. The third is that the taker and property owner voluntarily settle on above-market compensation during pre-condemnation negotiations. (Garnett 203) Thus, there is no economic redevelopment or public good being brought with eminent domain. The government can no longer use such as an excuse to allow such power to exist. It is strictly a resource for affluent business owners.
Eminent domain hinders economic growth and advancement for the cities. “A theoretical analysis of land assembly with and without eminent domain concludes that,…

Related Documents: Essay Eminent Domian

Eminent Domain:
Tommy
Professor Hidy
Legal Environment of Business
17 April 2012
Eminent domain refers to the government and state having power over all property within a state, usually the power to take property for public uses, such as a park or library. In the United States, under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, the owner of any property is entitled to reasonable compensation, this meaning the fair market value of the property. The fair market value is the highest…

room that's "mine." As my mother always says, "It's for the good of the family." But, no matter how much I feel deprived, I always know that I'll have it back in a few days. However, the results would be different if she applied the principal of "eminent domain." I would lose my room permanently, and it would be turned into a real guest room. I would not be a happy family member.
Because of this experience, I can empathize with the home owners affected by the recent 5:4 Supreme Court decision…

Indict- formally accuse. Investigate. The police indicted john smith of black market arms dealing.
Double jeopardy- one cannot be tried twice for the same crime. Casey Anthony. The accused in the Casey Anthony was later found guilty but not arrested.
Eminent Domain- power to take personal property to benefit the public. Military equipment. The man was sold equipment vital to the military and did not know.
Naturalized citizen- foreign born people whose parents are not citizens. My grandma. My grandma…

* National football league was not a single entity.
* Because they did not share profits and loses.
* Days after the raiders announced they were leaving Oakland to go to LA the city of Oakland bought an eminent domain action to acquire the team.
* Went to trial in may of 1983 and the court entered judgment for the raiders
* On appeal it was remanded to the trial court, with directions to consider certain remaining objectives to plaintiff’s suit which had not previously been addressed…

1. Is taking property through eminent domain fair?
No, because focusing a person out of his or her property isn’t fair like the quick take power. Especially, when they only give you just compensation and don’t really give you full value on your house. There should be balance between what the government can with a person’s property, for what they believe is for the greater public good.
2. Is current fair market value "just and equitable" eminent domain pricing for property owners that…

Fifth Amendment
“Just compensation” “Eminent Domain”
JOSE CONTRERAS
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Author Note
Introducing Public Administration
PAD 700-01
Prof. Terrence Harris
ABSTRACT
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. The Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787, by the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and ratified by conventions in eleven states. It went into effect on March 4, 1789. When…

Stratford-upon-Avon, United Kingdom. He was married to Anne Hathaway for thirty four years. Shakespeare had three kids. He was an English poet, playwright and actor, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon".
Milton
John Milton was born on December 9, 1608, at Cheapside, United Kingdom. Later died on November 8, 1674, at Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom was an English poet…

Commandments. They also have some of the same words, but they broke them down into different ways to give a different meaning or interpretation that may stray away from the original Ten Commandments.
City of Oakland, California vs. Oakland Raiders
Eminent domain is defined as the government’s power to take private property for public use. The owner of the property must be allowed by the government to make a case for the reason why they such be given the right to keep the property. If the government…

Words 1401 - Pages 6

* Test names and other trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders. None of the trademark holders are affiliated with this website.