Tuesday, 29 May 2018

The Soviet Union is commonly perceived to have been an absolute tyranny where opponents of the regime ended up with a bullet in the head. That form of coercion may have ended shortly after the death of Stalin but there never was real political freedom. All political activities had to conform to Party orthodoxy, potentially troublesome foreigners were excluded, no meaningful opposition media were allowed and rather than facing a bullet to the head dissidents could expect to lose their jobs, or if they got too stroppy sentenced to jail by one of the Party's kangaroo courts.

How different is that to what applies today in Britain? Not a lot really. Just a few days ago Tommy Robinson, in his role as a citizen journalist, was filming outside the court where Muslim child rapists were on trial. Police pulled him off the street, dragged him in front of a judge who immediately, without his legal representative being present, sentenced him to thirteen months in prison. After which he was immediately whisked off to start his sentence while the judge imposed a media blackout. How different is that case (and many others like it) to Soviet practice?

In Britain, and in many other Western countries, the media is controlled, unorthodox political views will lose you your job or land you in jail, laws are so vague as to guarantee convictions, non-conforming foreigners are routinely excluded, education has been replaced by indoctrination, in effect there's just one political party, political hacks get promoted to top positions....and now we have a political activist tried and jailed in secret. I ask again, how is that different to the USSR?War has been declared on the British people. The Government and its agencies are with the enemy, if not actually theenemy. Why else would they appoint the likes of this clown to head the Crown Prosecution Service and make the likes of these people responsible for the safety of White children? There's a reason for such appointments and British (i.e. White) candidates understand that they either get on message or get nowhere. Just like the Soviet Union. That in turn explains the traitorous behaviour of the police, courts and all Government agencies.The question is...where's it going to end? Will the British people (and Western Europeans generally) keep retreating, heads down, paying the mortgage while ameliorating the pain of their dispossession with sport and entertainment mind-rot? Or will the traitors and their invader foot soldiers finally push them to outright rebellion?I have no idea how this will turn out.

Sunday, 27 May 2018

How many of you remember Sarah Ferguson, the erstwhile Duchess of York, ex-wife of Prince Andrew? More specifically the endless hounding she suffered from the MSM almost from the beginning? She was excoriated for being a promiscuous spendthrift from an 'ordinary' family whose father was a mere Army Major. Despite being basically a decent girl married to a guy with very dodgy sexual predilections she was always the Bad One. And of course she had ginger hair and a freckly face.

Contrast that with the unalloyed reverence and veneration which Meghan Markle has enjoyed from the very beginning. Yet compared to her Fergie has been a model of chastity, good breeding and dignity. Albeit with ginger hair and freckly skin. In saner times Markel would have seen as the Bad Princess straight from central casting, would have been hard to imagine anyone less worthy of becoming part of the Royal House of Windsor.

After all she's mixed-race, comes from a ghetto in LA, her deeply embarrassing family (her father selling personal photos, a cousin wedding guest stopped entry to a nightclub for trying to smuggle in a knife) all seem to hate her despite using her new status to make money for themselves. Thomas Markle Jr describes his sister in an open letter to the Prince as a "jaded, shallow, conceited woman that will make a joke of you and the royal family heritage. As more time passes to your royal wedding, it became very clear that this is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history. Meghan Markle is obviously not the right woman for you."

Shortly after this the Royal in-law was arrested for allegedly holding a gun to a woman's head during a drunken argument

And the 'Princess' herself? Rode the cock carousel so hard that its bearings must have flamed out at some stage. Was a soft-porn actress (see her Royal Highness above thrusting her naked butt into the air for all to see), and in an inspired piece of casting, played a prostitute in Beverly Hills, 90210 in which she 'performed an intimate act' on screen in broad daylight. One of her countless 'boyfriends' was porn-star Simon Rex (lower picture). Sheer class.

Yet the gushing feelgood fantasy story continues unabated. Another institution bites the dust in the Long March Through The Institutions.

Thursday, 24 May 2018

Boy, has Ireland progressed since the days when the Church had its well-tailored heel on our necks. The Culture War here is less a war and more a headlong retreat for the forces of tradition as 'progressives' sweep them off the battlefield on issue after issue. We've just approved gay marriage by a landslide majority, have appointed Katherine Zappon (Strapon), an American of indeterminate gender (and negligible voter support) who fetched up some time ago in Ireland with her/his/its 'wife' and became Minister responsible for.......Children And Youth Affairs. And best of all have elected a homosexual Pakistani Hindu as our Prime Minister.See how Ireland had progressed everyone!But there's one arena in which the traditionalists have held sway: Abortion. At least up to now. Because tomorrow the country holds a Referendum which proposes to remove the Constitutional restrictions that currently apply. The issue is both complex and simple and there's no point in going through all the issues here other than take issue with the canard that 'it's the woman's right to choose. My body, my choice'. It is up to a point but if we take it to its logical conclusion it means that the woman can choose to abort the unborn baby any time right up to the point of birth. In other words she can choose infanticide. This is not hyperbole because late-term terminations of viable foetuses are taking place in Britain and many other places this very day.Naturally enough the Referendum's proponents are not running on this platform. It's twelve weeks and that's it. And we'll never look to increase that time limit. We swear! The exact same progression took place in Britain and Ireland's craven politicians, with no Constitutional prohibition to hide behind, will gradually extend the time limit in response to the shrieking feminist mob and their air-headed dupes in the general population. According to the opinion polls the Yes side will easily carry the day. Not surprising given the state of the zeitgeist with the Catholic Church relegated to the status of helpless onlooker. In fact I wouldn't be surprised were the current Pope to proclaim abortion as a virtuous act. But I have a feeling that the result might a lot closer than the consensus indicates. Ireland might yet see an awakening of the forces that gave us Trump and give the nation-wreckers a closer run than they expect.

Monday, 21 May 2018

How about this for a mouth-watering business plan? You sell crap coffee for twice the normal price in a place that doubles as a homeless shelter where 'all are welcome' whether or not they buy anything. While they join a long queue waiting for their order to be fulfilled customers can take in gangs of black teenagers chimping out, junkies shooting up at the tables and savour the juicy aroma wafting from the bathroom as a homeless man, whose earlier meal came from a nearby dumpster, relieves himself on the floor. This kind of thing.

Not exactly calculated to set the pulses of a would-be investor racing, is it? Yet that represents Starbucks' new business strategy, developed following the Rittenhouse Square Massacre where two black non-customers were, in line with company policy, asked to leave unless they made a purchase. When they refused they were subsequently removed - with no use of force - by local police. An everyday occurrence in this type of business you'd imagine. But in this instance it became an overnight national scandal.

To the extent that Starbucks have now fundamentally revised their customer policies, declaring their dining and bathroom facilities 'open to all' whether they're paying customers or not. Now for sure I have nothing but contempt for corporations that virtue signal about equality while paying their 'partners' subsistence wages (exemplar: Amazon) or tech companies that trumpet their commitment to diversity while employing virtually no blacks (exemplar: Google). But in this instance it does seem as if Starbucks have literally put their money where their mouth is. This move - if followed through - will inevitably have a major, and possibly irrecoverable, impact on their bottom line. If they don't follow through a storm of negative publicity is sure to follow so they lose either way. I don't get it.

Sunday, 20 May 2018

Thursday, 17 May 2018

Most of us associate Jewish power with their dominance of banking, "news" media and the entertainment industry. More recently this has extended to the digital world with the main social media and search engine platforms being under Jewish control and ownership. This is a chillingly wide and deep span of power. In fact in terms of controlling the information flow I'd say it approaches that wielded by the medieval Christian Church.And this isn't the worst of it because Israeli companies are now to be found in powerful and sometimes dominant positions at critical points throughout the underlying layers of the technology universe like:

The implications are dramatic as the Israelis now have the power to literally bring the Western world - and most of the rest of it - grinding to a halt by sabotaging utilities like electricity, water and telecommunications, banking transactions and airport operations. Add in the capacity to hack into critical corporate and government systems and databases and the circle is complete. Bear in mind that unlike earlier technologies, which could (with difficulty) be reverse engineered to discover malware, the millions of modern microprocessors are closed impenetrable black boxes. Would the Israelis have built in trojan horses or trapdoors into these chips? What do you think??You may well ask how the West finds itself in this catastrophic predicament. You might also ask how a small country like Israel has achieved this level of dominance. A number of factors account for it. First their military and intelligence services recruited large numbers of top researchers and developers and got them working on key technologies in a structured programme going back more than thirty years. Stolen technology from the West also helped as did the ready availability of VC funding and a fifth column of sayanim smoothing the way in enemy territory (that's us, you understand). In any event - in my view - they now have the West by the balls.

Monday, 14 May 2018

Although having abandoned Christianity as a teenager and subsequently dismissed all religion as mumbo I've begun to reassess my views in recent times as developments increasingly suggest the Bible prophesy stuff might not have been so daft after all. One of the most remarkable has been the self-destruction of the Catholic Church which has gone into overdrive under the present Pope who, in his short reign to date, has come out with more heresies than all the other Popes combined.Watching the antics of this one man wrecking-ball brings to mind the testimony of former United States Communist Party member, Bella Dodd before the House on Un-American Activities in 1952. The Communist Party in the 1930s "put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within. Right now they are in the highest places, and they are working to bring about change in order that the Catholic Church will no longer be effective against Communism. The change would be so drastic that you will not recognize the Catholic Church." And we all know with whom the American Communist Party was synonymous, don't we?

Now consider the words of the brilliant Jesuit theologian Malachi Martin from the mid-nineties. "Roman Catholics will then have the spectacle of a Pope validly elected who cuts the entire visible body of the Church loose from the traditional unity and the papacy-oriented apostolic structure that the Church has hitherto always believed and taught was divinely established. The shudder that will shake the Roman Catholic body in that day will be the shudder of its death agony. … Many will accept the new regime. Many will resist. All will be fragmented. There will be no one on earth to hold the fractionating members of the visible Roman Catholic body together as a living compact organization. [This will] transform the Papacy itself into a complaisant, even a cooperative, handmaiden in the service of a new creation. A new earthly habitat. A truly New World Order.”

Friday, 11 May 2018

It seems that a sinister new alt-right force is emerging on the Web. In fact it's so secretive that they call themselves the Intellectual Dark Web. Now you must understand that the Dark Web is not something vague where naughty people post bad stuff. It has specific technical characteristics (you need TOR to access it) while its content does not get indexed by search engines so will never be found by the casual user. On the Dark Web you can buy military-grade weapons, child porn...all payable in untraceable Bitcoin. Its primary differentiator is to hide the identity of both users and content providers.

In view of this I expected the Intellectual Dark Web to lie well to the right of Andrew Anglin who himself has been forced onto the Dark Web on occasions. But in this instance? Well, not exactly. And we know this because the New York Slimes was able to reveal the identities of the main stakeholders even though they'd described 'people like them who dare venture into this are in “There Be Dragons” territory'. So why the 'Dark Web' in the first place. Was this a form of doxxing? No. "The core members have little in common. Bret and Eric Weinstein and Ms. Heying were Bernie Sanders supporters. Mr. Harris was an outspoken Hillary voter. Ben Shapiro is an anti-Trump conservative."

Well I can be of assistance to the author (((Bari Weiss))) here because in fact they have a number of crucial things in common. For a start they all hate Trump and second they're all Jewish. And here's a a third: No self-respecting alt-right/White advocacy movement would or should touch them with a barge pole. Because they're straight from the Jewish Infiltrate And Subvert playbook. Textbook examples, down even to the point where a few neutered goys like Douglas ('anti-Semitism is a mental disease') Murray are allowed to play with them. Under careful supervision.

If we're to believe the New York Slimes (stop laughing at the back!) the movement is "a collection of iconoclastic thinkers, academic renegades and media personalities who are having a rolling conversation.... that sound unlike anything else happening, at least publicly, in the culture right now." Er, no. It's a reflection of the fact that Jews and their shabbos goy allies realise that they're losing control of The Narrative, that coercion, lawfare and violence are no longer in themselves enough to prevent Whites awakening to their impending dispossession and that more subtle measures are required.

Sunday, 6 May 2018

Virtually everyone on this blog will be familiar with the objectives of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. It's knowledge that we can put to good use in the right circumstances. To do so we need to be able to demonstrate three things. First the broad outlines of the plan itself. Second the fact that the Plan attracted major financial and political support - it wasn't just someone's plan. Third that implementation of the Plan's recommendations started shortly after WW II and continues to this day. All three components are essential in making our case.

The plan proposes to miscegenate Europeans out of existence and replace them with European/African/Asian hybrids. 'The man of the future will be of mixed race.The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice.The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.' Can't be much clearer than that!

Kalergi* makes one exception to this mixed-race fate: Jews. 'Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It's not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats.' Kalergi makes clear that this 'new elite' will rule over the dumbed-down mixed-race helots in a supposedly benign but fundamentally undemocratic system. (Count Coudenhove-Kalergi himself was not Jewish but his main benefactors and two of his wives were). A good summary of his plan be readhereand is strongly recommended.

From the very outset Kalergi attracted support from massively wealthy and powerful Jews. Baron Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild became his personal friend and introduced him to mega-bankers Max Warburg who in turn introduced him to extravagantly wealthy Jewish financiers Paul Warburg (Max's brother), Bernard Baruch, and Baruch’s brother Felix. These connections provided lavish funding and political support to Kalergi on an ongoing basis.

Such support inevitably lead to practical results and, capitalising on the carnage of WW II the plan's sponsors began to change the face of Europe and other White countries. The Charlemange Prize, often referred to as the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize (although as the goyim awaken this association is being downplayed) became Europe's most prestigious, and, straight from the Orwellian playbook was awarded ostensibly to the person who did most to 'promote European cohesion'. Not surprisingly the Count himself was the recipient of the first Award in 1950. Subsequent winners represent a rogues' gallery of nation-wrecking traitors including Churchill (presumably for his efforts in destroying Europe during the war), Kissinger, Blair, Clinton, Merkel, Trichet and the current Pope. Since that first Award tens of millions of brown and black invaders have flooded all over the White world, rendering vast swathes of it unrecognisable from what they'd been less than fifty years earlier. And, spurred by an endless barrage of propaganda, the miscegenation project is in full sway, with Kalergi's mystery meat everywhere we look. Meanwhile our Jewish puppet masters pull the strings from behind the curtain.

This is powerful stuff. Provided we can get it out there among the general public. Which is where the Elevator Pitch comes in. But how can we possibly compress it into a meaningful and convincing pitch that lasts about half a minute? Well here's my first cut."Did you know that the whole EU project is based on a plan originally drawn up in the 1920s by a Japanese-European Count? He said that the European man of the future would be of mixed White, African and Asiatic race ruled over by a Jewish elite. The proposals attracted massive financial and political support from powerful Jews and the EU from its beginning directly follows the Plan's proposals'.In itself this will not convince anyone. But the objective is to lead people to further question the Ordained Narrative. You'll notice that I downplay the Jewish role for the Pitch. Remember that White goyim have been brainwashed to the point of altered brain chemistry when it comes to the JQ. It must be introduced with care.*I suggest shortening the Count's full name to Kalergi in general conversation. Brevity is the essence of the Elevator Pitch!

Saturday, 5 May 2018

Tuesday, 1 May 2018

So Amber Rudd has bitten the dust, a victim of the very multiculturalism and diversity she worked so hard to promote. Her civil servants let her down by telling some people illegally in Britain that they were, well, illegally In Britain. Shock, horror - and Rudd's resignation - duly followed. Her replacement was quickly named. He's Sajid Javid, a Pakistani Muslim. He promised that his "first priority" would be to right the wrongs of the Windrush Scandal, that which drove Rudd from office. Maybe someone will suggest to him that addressing the epidemic of black murders convulsing London might be more urgent. In any event this is the guy with responsibility for enforcing the control of Britain's borders and the overall administration of justice. Don't you feel better already?

And what a support team he's got. Idi Amin lookalike Mike Fuller is now Chief Inspector of the Crown Prosecution Service. His main claim to fame, apart from being the first black to hold this position, is to have used a personal chauffeur to clock up more than 150,000 miles in six years travelling from his home in London to his office in Kent.

Javid presumably will have his hands full dealing with the mass rape of White children by members of his Muslim community. Then again he might have other things on his mind. Like punishing the civil servants who told the Windrush illegals that they were illegal. If he's too busy he can enlist the aid of this guy who's head of the Crown Prosecution Service's Child Abuse Unit. Yet another Pakistani Muslim, Nazir Asfal has professed himself to be "unruffled by mounting media hysteria (sic) over the ethnicity of abusers in Rotherham". Instead he suggests "stepping back and taking a wider view of the nationwide picture".

And in taking a wider view of the nationwide picture Asfal can count on the assistance of Bardardo's Homes, "the main provider of child sexual exploitation services in the UK". And who heads up Barnardo's? It's Javed Kahn, yet another Pakistani Muslim, one who has been exposed as having turned a blind eye to the abuse of White children by Muslims over many years.

I think every parent in Britain can rest easily with their children under the care of such a team, dedicated 24x7 to the welfare of British citizens.

Meanwhile yet another Pakistani Muslim rules over the kuffars of the nation's capital. Sadiq Khan, a terrorist-sympathising dwarf who can't speak proper English has become the self-appointed spokesman for the British people by declaring President Trump to be unwelcome in his country. Sorry, I mean in Britain. Khan's country is of course Pakistan.

Maybe a change of Government will see brain-box Diane Abbot as Treasury Secretary. After all if Compton ghetto trash can marry into the Royal Family anything is possible.Isn't it amazing...the British people who built an Empire that ruled a quarter of the world and inter alia ran the whole Indian sub-continent, from Afghanistan to Burma, with about 200,000 of their own people, now need their former subjects to run their own country?Is that an evil cackle I hear from behind the curtain?