Jeremy Hylton wrote:
>>>>>>"CT" == Christian Tismer <tismer at tismer.com> writes:
>>>>>>>> CT> Dear Stackless members, tue to technical reasons, I have moved
> CT> the Stackless mailing list to tismer.com .
>>And we're all eagerly awaiting the details of your new plans for
>Stackless!
>I'll second that. We've got quite a code base tied up with the current
stackless design.
I'm sure that non-portable tricks (like setjmp/longjmp) would guarantee
that stackless will never get into the standard distribution. But if
the changes are as small as you say, they might get pound-ifdef
status... and it wouldn't be a problem.
Throw us a bone, Chris!
-Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/attachments/20020118/0e333ae5/attachment.htm>