Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Governments were intervening for the common good before
the first socialist theories were invented.

I know many of you Republicans right now are fixated on the
awful prospect of Donald Trump becoming the party nominee for President. It may
be of some comfort that the Democrats are also displaying cracks in their unity
along much the same lines: they too are going through a revolt of the Populists
against the Optimates. The only difference is, their Optimate candidate, Hillary
Clinton, is in a much better position to steal — er, win the nomination than is the Republicans’ Optimate, Jeb! Bush.
(However, if
Clinton gets the nod, Republicans have a better chance of winning in November.)

Sanders Still Viable

Right now, though, explaining how we got to this point is of
less interest than considering how we get out of this mess … or, at least, how
we avoid repeating it four years down the line. Bernie Sanders is still a
viable candidate, despite the poor turnout in Nevada; if he pulls off the
nomination, the GOP will likely lose the White House no matter who they
nominate.

This fact doesn’t seem to register with Republicans: Optimate
Democrats are much less concerned about Sanders than Optimate Republicans are
scared (yes, scared) of Trump and
Cruz. There are fewer Democrats who would never vote for him than there are
Republicans who would never vote for Trump or Cruz.

I hate writing about Sanders’ candidacy again so soon after my
last post on the topic. However, in thinking about it, my last post was too
indirect, too reflective. What needs to be said, has to be said bluntly:

Republicans, wake the
[deleted] up. You’re missing the point. You’re not paying attention, and that’s going
to cost you every other November until you get the hint. Here’s why:

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Oddly enough, according to a couple of sources, Associate
Justice Antonin G. Scalia’s best friend was AJ Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Said
Marcia Coyle on PBS NewsHour Weekend,
Scalia, who passed away Saturday at the age of 79, “was widely liked ... a very colorful
writer, and in person ... a consummate gentleman, ... could be very funny. He
is going to be missed ... especially by Justice Ginsburg, with whom he had a
special friendship — they called each other best friends — and with whom he
went to opera and ... to India.”

“He does not write like a happy man”

To hear Scalia described as “widely liked” and a “consummate
gentleman” may sound improbable to people who only knew of him through his
strident, hectoring argumentation on the bench, especially to liberals and
progressives who came to hate him as a conservative obstructionist. (One gay
man of my acquaintance sneered, “My condolences to the Koch brothers for their
loss.”)

Because Scalia’s opinions coincided often with conservative
interests, it was all too easy to claim his originalism was merely intellectual
cover for his political views — in fact, so easy that more substantive legal
criticism often went lacking. His dissents — and he wrote plenty of dissents in
his nearly thirty years’ tenure on the SCOTUS bench — often sacrificed detailed
analysis of the legal principles involved in favor of sarcastic fiskings of the
majority opinion and fervent homilies on the wider implications of the decision;
e.g., his dissent in Obergefell v. Hodges
(513
U.S. ___ [2015]; pp. 69 ff.). So acidic were his opinions that, as Conor Clarke observed in Slate, “Scalia’s
opinions read like they’re about to catch fire for pure outrage. He does not,
in short, write like a happy man.”

Saturday, February 6, 2016

Does anybody remember Occupy Wall Street? As nutty and quixotic as it was, it grew out of real social problems and concerns. And the improbable success of Bernie Sanders as a presidential candidate is a reminder that the problems didn’t go away just because the protesters did.

“We Are the 99%”

To refresh your memory: OWS never had a single public list of demands, although several people posted lists on their website which the press then published as “official”. Nevertheless, Roger Lowenstein wrote in Bloomberg.com, “the overall message is reasonably
coherent. They want more and better jobs, more equal distribution of income, less profit (or no profit) for banks, lower compensation for bankers, and more strictures on banks with regard to negotiating consumer services such as mortgages and debit cards. They also want to reduce the influence that
corporations — financial firms in particular — wield in politics, and they want a more populist set of government priorities: bailouts for student debtors and mortgage holders, not just for banks.”

This “reasonably coherent message”, give or take an exaggeration or two, could just as easily be Sanders’ platform.

Even near the end, OWS had support from about one-third of American voters, finding some little support even among Republicans, according to Public Policy Polling, while just over half the Democrats responded favorably. The cry “We are the 99%”, as inapposite as it was, found resonance with a significant percentage of the people; Paul Taylor of the Pew Research Center told Scott Horsley of NPR that it was “arguably the most successful slogan since ‘Hell no, we won’t go,’ going back to the Vietnam era. … [It] certainly triggered a lot of coverage about economic inequality.”

Search This Blog

Blegging Bowl

Buy Tony a cup of coffee!

Disclaimer

This site is not an official organ of the Holy Catholic Church.The opinions expressed on this blog are solely those of the author, and are not to be construed to express the opinions of the Holy See or the Dioceses of Fort Worth and Dallas. Doctrinal discussions should be considered authoritative only so far as the relevant official documents of the Catholic Church are quoted; any errors of interpretation or explanation are the author's alone, and I would appreciate correction.

Also, as this is a personal blog, the opinions I express are not those of my employers, their clients, their vendors, or any other affiliate.

Feedjit

Networked Blogs

Intense Debate Comments

ShareThis

NOTICE

Effective 12/21/2011, Outside the Asylumoperates under the Welborn Protocol: All communications, including e-mail and comments, are considered open for use as material for future posts. If you wish to submit a private e-mail, please put "DO NOT POST" in either the subject line or the message body. Please refer to the Comment Policy page for further guidelines on comments.