CNN Zakaria: Russia Is Endangering The New Global OrderThe New Global Order

The Elites arent even hiding it anymore they are letting everyone know what kind world we are currently living in and CNN's Zakaria is lashing out
agaisnt Russia by stating that Russia existence threatens the world order in public.

that Russia is grossly endangering a global order that has benefited the entire world.

Russia is grossly endangering a global order that has benefited the entire world. Really CNN this global order has benefited the entire world in what
ways again? i will tell you nothing but pure destruction & chaos.

It at least it shows the elites whom are behind the New Global Order and the bilderberg group are running scared of losing everything they worked so
for 50 years or more.

Apparently the new World Order is an Order where America is ruling the world apparently judging by reading the article by Zakaria.

I would suggest that this 'global order' as referred to by Zakaria, is nothing more than the global order of nation-states. He isn't talking about
a small group of influential elitists, rather, he is talking about a global order of nation-states.

In other words, Zakaria is saying that Russia's push into Crimea is threatening the balance of the world and it's states, not a group of elitists.

daaskapital
I would suggest that this 'global order' as referred to by Zakaria, is nothing more than the global order of nation-states. He isn't talking about
a small group of influential elitists, rather, he is talking about a global order of nation-states.

In other words, Zakaria is saying that Russia's push into Crimea is threatening the balance of the world and it's states, not a group of elitists.

Either when America pushed into Yusgalavia and the two wars they had started in Iraq and Afghanistan was that not threatening the balance of the
world and it's states apparently according to NeoCons and War Mongers it wasn't.

BAR... Russia, North Korea, Syria, Iran and the rest of the sad cases of the planet being delusional and resorting to 19th century solutions - See
more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Really? Russia, Syria the rest of the sad cases of the planet being delusional and resorting to 19th century solutions? but America and Saudi Arabia
a nation is behind 19th century along with America isn't thinking the same?

TritonTaranis
He's talking about a coalition and unity between much of the civilised world which has seen major conflicts near extinct

BAR... Russia, North Korea, Syria, Iran and the rest of the sad cases of the planet being delusional and resorting to 19th century solutions

Not the illuminati conspiracy

You mean like the US/western powers invading sovereighn nations illegally? Or its support of illegal groups home and abroad? Or is the use of
indiscrimate tactics as drones and DU?
Ignorance at its finest...

BAR... Russia, North Korea, Syria, Iran and the rest of the sad cases of the planet being delusional and resorting to 19th century solutions - See
more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Really? Russia, Syria the rest of the sad cases of the planet being delusional and resorting to 19th century solutions? but America and Saudi Arabia
a nation is behind 19th century along with America isn't thinking the same?

Sunnis are a majority in Syria, 90% of Syria are Sunnis

Run by a Russian backed Shiite minority in power, 90% of Assads government is Shiite

So it's ok for the 60% of Russian speaking ethnics in Ukraine's Crimea region to request and illegal annexation from Russia now?

Not sure if you realise how much of a hypocrite you're being, and since when was the US involved in Syria? The west arms the Saudis maybe that's
where you're confused

TritonTaranis
He's talking about a coalition and unity between much of the civilised world which has seen major conflicts near extinct

BAR... Russia, North Korea, Syria, Iran and the rest of the sad cases of the planet being delusional and resorting to 19th century solutions

Not the illuminati conspiracy

You mean like the US/western powers invading sovereighn nations illegally? Or its support of illegal groups home and abroad? Or is the use of
indiscrimate tactics as drones and DU?
Ignorance at its finest...

Chemical weapons are still WMDs btw, and I think this matter is debatable for another thread entirely

It's was a bad decision to go, I think we all agree, but two wrongs don't make a right, but the fact is the circumstances and actions are entirely
different the coalition never made a land grab

BAR... Russia, North Korea, Syria, Iran and the rest of the sad cases of the planet being delusional and resorting to 19th century solutions - See
more at: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Really? Russia, Syria the rest of the sad cases of the planet being delusional and resorting to 19th century solutions? but America and Saudi Arabia
a nation is behind 19th century along with America isn't thinking the same?

Sunnis are a majority in Syria, 90% of Syria are Sunnis

Run by a Russian backed Shiite minority in power, 90% of Assads government is Shiite

So it's ok for the 60% of Russian speaking ethnics in Ukraine's Crimea region to request and illegal annexation from Russia now?

Not sure if you realise how much of a hypocrite you're being, and since when was the US involved in Syria? The west arms the Saudis maybe that's
where you're confused

Ironic, so let me get this straight what Russian speaking ethnics in Ukraine's Crimea region did was an illegal annexation yet they voted largely
peacefully in an electrocute referendum voting process where the majority voted in favor of joining and being with Russia.

Compare that to what your beloved unelected fascists did in Kiev which was not an illegal coup but your beloved fascists couldn't wait for the
elections to come they wanted an action by America fast.

since when was the US involved in Syria?

Since the early start and everyone here knows it.

Run by a Russian backed Shiite minority in power

Saudi Arabia and other Gulf regime states are run by America and Britannia. What was the point again?

How can we ignore Russia only Invaded a sovereign country to protect its 12% of ethnic Russians

Sounds like you had deflected with everything i had stated in my post which is not surprising. Again Russia didn't Invade country which belonged to
Russia From the start and without Russia there wouldn't be an Ukraine today.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.