Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item :http://hdl.handle.net/2066/159026

Display more details

Subject:

Biological psychologyBiologische psychologieDI-BCB_DCC_Theme 0

Organization:

SW OZ DCC KIFSW_Fac. algemeen

Journal title:

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Volume:

vol. 7

Page start:

p. art. nr.

Page end:

p. 129

Abstract:

In this paper, we investigate to what extent it is justified to draw conclusions about causal relations between brain states and mental states from cognitive neuroscience studies. We first explain the views of two prominent proponents of the interventionist account of causation: Woodward and Baumgartner. We then discuss the implications of their views in the context of traditional cognitive neuroscience studies in which the effect of changes in mental state on changes in brain states is investigated. After this, we turn to brain stimulation studies in which brain states are manipulated to investigate the effects on mental states. We argue that, depending on whether one sides with Woodward or Baumgartner, it is possible to draw causal conclusions from both types of studies (Woodward) or from brain stimulation studies only (Baumgartner). We show what happens to these conclusions if we adopt different views of the relation between mental states and brain states. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for psychiatry and the treatment of psychiatric disorders.