I would say if he was a neighbor of theirs at 14, and knew the victim and her family, she most likely was his first victim. The fact that the dog didn't bark tells me the dog knew him too and would not have been alarmed at his presence in the house. Serial killers (especially sexual predators) start young. Their crimes go often undetected until they are older. How truly sad. So many young victims.

I don't know why blacks coddle criminals. When Ted Bundy was executed I did not complain at all. Except maybe it should have been sooner.

Now there are people who have been convicted of crimes that I believe are totally innocent. Bruno Richard Hauptman was executed for the kidnapping and murder of the Lindbergh baby and I feel he was innocent.

Bruno Richard Hauptman was executed for the kidnapping and murder of the Lindbergh baby and I feel he was innocent. www.wm3.org

Hauptmann was set up from the word "go". It was a fact known only among a few in the Lindbergh household that the mother was abusive to the baby and often left bruises. My guess has always been it was child abuse gone awry, and Lindbergh used his connections to make it look the the child had been abducted and later killed. He wouldn't be the first wealthy person in America to pull that kind of stunt.

This girl was long suspected to be his first victim, even though Bundy always denied it. It wasn't until recently that DNA evidence identified the real killer, who was arrested and convicted for it. As far as Bundy goes, he didn't start killing women until after being dumped and then finding out he was a bastard. He was never quite right growing up, but it was those two events that pushed him over the edge and set him out on his reign of terror of murdering girls who looked like his ex.

I don't know why blacks coddle criminals. When Ted Bundy was executed I did not complain at all. Except maybe it should have been sooner.

Now there are people who have been convicted of crimes that I believe are totally innocent. Bruno Richard Hauptman was executed for the kidnapping and murder of the Lindbergh baby and I feel he was innocent.

In the United States, perhaps the most famous victim of Jewish ritual murder was the son of Charles Lindbergh, on March 1, 1932, during the time of the annual Jewish celebration. Lindbergh's son was chosen because Lindbergh himself was the most logical person to lead the gentiles against the Jews.
His son was slain as a warning to him to decline this service. Lindberg's father, a Congressman, had led the fight against Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb Co., when Warburg succeeded in getting a subservient Congress to pass the Federal Reserve Act.
The elder Lindbergh had published a book which was burned by Federal agents during World War I, even though he was a Congressman at the time. He was well aware of the nature of the Jewish problem. Now that his son was a world-famous man, after his feat of flying alone across the Atlantic, the Jews feared that he might be persuaded to lead a gentile revolt against their power.
They had already planned World War II, in which Germany was to be the sacrificial victim, and now they brought in an almost illiterate German, Gerhart Hauptmann, and convicted him of the killing. Symbolically, Hauptmann, like Christ, was also a carpenter, a profession which made him a logical victim for the Jews.
Hauptmann's defense was that a Jew named Isidor Fisch had hired him to do some carpenter work, and had paid him with the bills which proved to be from the Lindbergh ransom money. Although the existence of Fisch was proven, he could not be located during the trial.
The court was like the one which had convicted Jesus, for it only accepted evidence which the Jews allowed to be presented. In reality, of course, one cannot believe anything which is accepted as evidence in an American court, due to the facility of the Jews for manufacturing evidence and due to the prevalence of Jewish lawyers and judges in all American court rooms. This was also the first of many efforts of the Jews to vilify the Germans so that America would be more easily deceived into fighting a Jew's war.

Hauptmann's defense was that a Jew named Isidor Fisch had hired him to do some carpenter work, and had paid him with the bills which proved to be from the Lindbergh ransom money. Although the existence of Fisch was proven, he could not be located during the trial.

Didn't know about that... would be seriously screwed up if that's what really happened. I sure as hell don't doubt the possibility.

Didn't know about that... would be seriously screwed up if that's what really happened. I sure as hell don't doubt the possibility.

There is plenty of evidence proving such things happened and are still happening.(I wonder if more children go missing during passover than other times of the year, it would probably be something to look into.)

Whether that is exactly what happened to Lindberghs child i have not read enough about the case ,although i will when i get the chance as i never knew about it myself up until i read a little about it last night.