WikiLeaks cables point to jeopardized seismic safety at Japan’s power plants

This DigitalGlobe satellite image recieved March 16, 2011 shows damage after the March 11 earthquake and tsunami at the Fukushima Dai Ichi Power Plant in Japan (AFP Photo) / AFP

Several confidential reports disclosed by WikiLeaks suggest that the Japanese government has been underperforming in tackling the safety of the country’s nuclear facilities and their ability to withstand earthquakes.

In December 2008, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) called on Japan to upgrade the standards for seismic safety of nuclear power stations, reports The Daily Telegraph newspaper, which sorted through the secret cables sent by the US embassy to Washington. Tokyo pledged to do so, but it is not clear what measures have been taken.

Anthony Wile, founder and editor in chief of the online magazine TheDailyBell.com, believes that despite those warnings there was little Japan could do.

“I don’t think that they had any choice. At that stage of the game, the commitments had already been made. What could they do?” he said. “I don’t think they had any choice but to turn a blind eye and hope for the best. And perhaps that just didn’t work out too well.”

He pointed out that such rescue missions are hardly the agency’s mission, although the IAEA is now sending that kind of message.

“The IAEA is a promoter of nuclear power,” he added. “The IAEA is not any more efficient in solving this problem than FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency] was in solving Hurricane Katrina’s problems in the US. These organizations exist primarily for the purposes of aiding and assisting multinational corporations to provide the solutions to developing and advancing nations who are sold on the nuclear power solution.”

And now, Wile notes, there is nothing even the IAEA can do to avert a disaster.

“You can clearly see that the IAEA has absolutely no ability to deal with this problem, any more than the Japanese government has the ability to deal with this problem,” Wile concluded.

In another cable, an unnamed expert said Japan has revised safety guides only three times in the last 35 years.

In
yet another one, US diplomats describe the way the Japanese government
opposed a court order to shut down a nuclear power plant over concerns
that the local population risks radiation exposure in case of an
earthquake with a magnitude higher than 6.5. The ruling had been
overturned in 2009.

One cable cited Taro Kono, a high-profile
member of Japan's lower house, as saying that the Japanese Ministry of
Economy had been covering up nuclear accidents and downplaying the cost
and problems associated with the industry.

Another diplomatic
report gave an account of concerns over cost reduction competition at
the expense of safety among power-generating companies in Japan.