So I'm guessing the people who welded the trade centres were of equal welding skill and there job depended on that skill.So the welds wouldn't fail,plus with the rivets would make this an even less likely to come apart or be broken apart,

"Unfortunately in construction it is extremely common for contractors not to fix or install properly all the expensive girders, ties and rebar that are supposed to be enclosed in the concrete. Supervising contractors and municipal inspectors can be corrupt."

This sells. but anything will if that is what they want to hear, and these writers like to write what they want to hear. Like NYT journalism. Also,

Can anyone tell me why NIST (the National Institute for Standards and Technology) has grown an addiction to my PC? :rolleyes: :huh: :P

PATRICK GALLAGHER -- DIRECTOR OF NIST

"Trust me! I'm a scientist!"

Hailing from Albuquerque, N.M., Gallagher got an early introduction into the world of science. Gallagher's father worked at Sandia National Laboratories, and the younger Gallagher got to visit the facility every-so-often.

The Sandia National Laboratories, which are managed and operated by the Sandia Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation), are two major United States Department of Energy research and development national laboratories.

omg - It's pretty much a family affair then ! Surprise, surprise! The father of the current NIST director was behind the pathetic Sandia "test" ? Great find, SimonJCP !!! Now we know what 'NIST' stands for :

N.I.S.T. = "The National Insitute of Science Tergiversation" :P

I've seen a few of these live - with my own eyes (Once, I was nearly zapped by flying debris). This is a virtually fully frontal one at about 200mph. Wall OK. Car KO - and NOT ending up on the other side of the wall. But - of course - the WTC was made of peanut butter... :rolleyes:

I hope this may translate into a very interesting development within the sphere of the cutting-edge 9/11 research. Of course, I also hope I'm not over-optimistic about this. Let's wait and see ! :)

You had them at September Clues, 2007 version.

However, maybe if enough people start recognizing (in better spelling, optimistically, though beggars can't be choosers) that you've analyzed enough evidence to put a great deal of people on trial in the Hague, it can actually happen. Unfortunately, it seems the Hague court is used in part to destroy what is left of the already former Yugoslavia and .... not do much else.

I have tried contacting the UN's various departments on this matter and nobody is willing to take it seriously, depsite listening carefully - I expect, for the most part - because there isn't a clamor.

If there's a clamor, I think we can expect to see some conclusive action on this in the coming decade. Now might be the time for us to start cold-calling representatives.

Hey guys, since we started pushing the latest discoveries in the vicsim research there has been started a massive discrediting campaing where slander is chosen over evidence when they are promoting their little psy-op.

So please, feel free to knock these shills out with some hard facts and evidence. That usually shuts them up ;)

On NBC, Tom Brokaw interviews his collegue RON INSANA (covered in white dust).Mr. Insana says that he was on the scene but the area was cordoned off ( of course ;) ... ). Then at 1:47 into the video, Ron Insana goes :

"Much like the images that were created for the movie INDEPENDENCE DAY..."

Woooo - those media people have pretty vivid imaginations, don't they?I thought it was only me ! :lol:

On NBC, Tom Brokaw interviews his collegue RON INSANA (covered in white dust).Mr. Insana says that he was on the scene but the area was cordoned off ( of course ;) ... ). Then at 1:47 into the video, Ron Insana goes :

"Much like the images that were created for the movie INDEPENDENCE DAY..."

Woooo - those media people have pretty vivid imaginations, don't they?I thought it was only me ! :lol:

Why the hell are so few of this 6%, who agree there were no planes, participating in this forum?

"The survey asked respondents whether four things that have been said and written about the events of 9/11 are actually credible. Just 15 per cent of respondents think the collapse of the World Trade Center was the result of a controlled demolition, and the same proportion believe that United Airlines Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was shot down.

In addition, 13 per cent of respondents think no airplane actually crashed at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, and six per cent claim that no airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center at all."

fbenario 4 Mar 18 2010, 08:22 PM wrote:Why the hell are so few of this 6%, who agree there were no planes, participating in this forum?

"The survey asked respondents whether four things that have been said and written about the events of 9/11 are actually credible. Just 15 per cent of respondents think the collapse of the World Trade Center was the result of a controlled demolition, and the same proportion believe that United Airlines Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was shot down.

In addition, 13 per cent of respondents think no airplane actually crashed at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, and six per cent claim that no airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center at all."

You see, most people do not want to be in the minority; viewed by others as tinfoil hat-wearing kooks.

There is safety and security when you go along with everybody else.

Don't you remember back to grade school days when everyone was afraid to askthe teacher a question because they were worried that the rest of the class wouldmake fun of them? That's precisely the technique used here.

Fear and ignorance are the best tools that a criminal can have and they're using it to the absolute best of their ability, squeezing out every last dropof bullshit and lies and feeding it to the trusting viewers.