I managed to find this article but many others seem to have been scrubbed from the web which is interesting. What made me raise an eyebrow is that
this is the first time ever I have seen a mainstream outlet question the integrity of MI6.

I think most of us understand, here on ATS, that MI6 are a dangerous organisation whom consider themselves above the law. There is no oversight of
such organisations. IMO, any organisation with the power of MI6 that has no oversight can and will only lead to massive corruption.

Giving someone that amount of power with no checks and balances is a serious mistake IMO.

Why should we trust MI6? Would you trust a complete stranger to keep you safe?

It is my belief, after looking hard at the evidence, that MI6 was fully complicit in the London bombings on 7/7. We know that MI6 purposely avoided
many questions regarding 7/7, and the inquest was a complete whitewash.

I posted this because this article gave me just a small glimmer of hope that a few more sheeple may question the integrity of the highly secretive
organisation with a license to kill who they like with no repercussion if they screw up.

This relates to false flag attacks MI6 carried out in Saudi in 2000 in an attempt to prevent the Saudis funding the Palestinian Indifada to the tune
of $1 billion dollars, they got caught, then 9/11 happened..........

OP while I absolutely agree that this case is highly suspicious you are wrong in several of your opening statements, firstly this article was not
“wiped from the web” as you were clearly able to get access to it. Furthermore this is not the first time that any of the MSN has reported on this
story or questioned the integrity of SIS, BBC news have been saying almost every two hours that the family lawyer claims the “dark arts of
intelligence were at work” and many of the MSM have made other allegations in the past against SIS particularly their involvement in the death of
David Kelly and Princess Diana. You are also incorrect to say that SIS has no oversight, it does in the form of the Intelligence and Security
Committee and to a lesser extend the Joint Intelligence Committee.

With this case specifically it is clearly obvious to anybody with half a brain that he was murdered by a third party as it has been proven in court it
would be almost impossible for him to lock himself in a bag like that. It has also so far been shown that the actions of SIS have been highly
suspicious such as taking a week to contact the police and even at that GCHQ had to do it, then withholding evidence form the police and accounts of
Mr Williams being unhappy at work. It all points to some very suspicious circumstances that leads me to believe that he was assassinated by SIS.

Should this be the case you can be almost guaranteed that this assassination was conducted by the Increment, just like David Kelly. However even the
very existence of the Increment is pure speculation there are other groups which may exist with in the UK that are either like them or just another
name of them such as Group 13 and GB75. Regardless the evidence all points to a SIS assassination, it wouldn’t be the first time they have done this
and it won’t be the last.

It is true that it might not have been MI6 but it has been proven that it would have been impossible for Mr Williams to have locked himself in that
bag so someone else had to lock him inside it. So it may have been someone from his private life or it could have been SIS. Whoever it was however
left no trace of ever being there which suggests the person knew what he/she was doing and taking into account a the information that has come out
thus far in the court I would be inclined to believe he was killed by SIS.

You are right however it is entirely plausible that someone else in his flat put him inside the case and killed him then left without leaving a trace
who had no connection to SIS. I however take the view that this was a SIS assassination.

Better he gets found dead a result of kinky games or jilted lover than goes missing shortly after returning from the US or having worked on City of
London security. As a missing agent there would have been a lot of alarm from the public and a deeper investigation, MI6 may have actually had to
provide some answers

While those could be seen as sloppy assassinations. We dont know for sure that they were assassinations and that they were done by the UK SIS / MI6.
So its pointless presenting them as examples that SIS / MI6 have done sloppy assassinations in the past for comparison to prove that they have done a
sloppy assassination in the recent case in London.

Its tough to provide solid evidences in such cases however if you had read the article you would have seen there was some pretty strong indicators
such as:

When Mercia MacDermott slipped the idea of getting rid of Markov, she did it with a one liner: "He's not very discreet is he?" Baroness Park
bragged about MI6 getting a person murdered with that one line. If she claims that Georgi Markov wasn't the victim, then somebody should ask the
Baroness who the victim was.

and

Six years after that, in April 1991, the Bulgarian Telegraph Agency announced the code names of two non-Bulgarians that received medals in 1979
for their involvement in the Markov murder. The author identifies the two agents, one of whom was a British double agent who now lives in Britain.
Baroness Park referred to the agent, a woman, on the BBC's Panorama in 1994, when praising the work of female agents in the Cold War, and also
described her role in causing a murder, which was in fact the Markov murder. CIA officer Aldrich Ames betrayed the agent to the KGB in 1985.

Robert Maxwell was murdered by MI6 in 1991 because, eight weeks prior to his death, he had received transcripts and audio cassettes of the agent’s
interrogation that would have incriminated MI6. The widow of Georgi Markov has been manipulated by the British security services for over twenty
years, spending a large amount of her own money in futile attempts to bring her husband’s murderers to justice. She will be glad to know that,
thanks to the author, Georgi Markov's murder led fairly directly to the downfall of the Soviet Union, which is described with considerable
documentation in the 'Markov File' currently in the House of Commons library in London. This article is from the file.

and perhaps most incriminating

The murder of British media magnate Robert Maxwell was MI6's most costly blunder (for Cap'n Bob's pensioners at least). A video of the second
autopsy (the real one, for his life assurance) was made in Israel and was the subject of extensive coverage in the French magazine Paris Match in
January 1992. Maxwell had been beaten up in his stateroom so as to get him to divulge the numbers of the combination lock of his safe. He was finally
stabbed in the abdomen and thrown overboard. Of course, all this was ignored by the British media, and certainly by Maxwell’s MI6 approved
biographer Tom Bower. Why was it considered necessary to murder Maxwell? Well, eight weeks prior to his murder he had received a visit from Andrei
Lukanov, the former communist Prime Minister of Bulgaria, who was probably Maxwell's closest associate in the Eastern Bloc. Lukanov gave Maxwell a
selection of documents, including no doubt audiocassettes, from the Markov file.

That is a very fair point however the case of David Kelly proves otherwise many in the MSN take the view that Dr Kelly was killed by SIS shows that
it is indeed possible for it to have happened before and SIS do at the very least plan assassination plots such as that of Slobodan Milosevic. It
would be naive to believe that SIS don’t assassinate people however I do not for a second discount the idea that he was murdered by a third party
with no connection to the intelligence services however I have been following this story with interested ever since it broke and to me so far I
believe that he was assassinated by the increment of SIS.

If you have balanced the evidence then fair enough that is the great thing about this website we all have different views on world events.

Out of interest, who do you believe that killed him now that it has been shown that it would have been almost impossible for him to lock himself in
the bag and then the only people with keys to the flat were his family and landlady both of whom have been ruled out and that the only other people to
visit the flat were colleague and whoever this third party was managed to leave no trace and killed him without a struggle. To me this points to SIS I
am not saying that there is absolute proof that SIS were responsible for his killing but to me this all points to a SIS assassination , however I am
genuinely curious as to who you think killed him and why?

Well it would be wrong to point the finger at any one country without any evidence but i think that he may have been killed by a foreign intelligence
agency. I get the feeling that someone was tapping him for info and then he either found out or didn't want to play along any more. That would make
sense for the killing because they didn't want the UK SIS you realize there had been a leak. If a foreign intelligence agency had been involved then
they could have cleaned up the place to not leave any trace of intruders. This would also explain the presence of the 9 memory sticks that were found.
It would also make sense that the UK SIS would not want to reveal there had been an intelligence breach.

I'm still not 100% sure why they would have to take the body rather than just make it look like a suicide. But if they had used chemicals / drugs, or
left marks on the body that would suggest he had been obviously murdered then it would make sense to try to dispose of it so that the UK SIS dont have
any clues to any foreign spy activity. I think the body was meant to have been removed but something went wrong. Dont forget its much hard for a
foreign spy / hit team to operate in another country than the countries own SIS. I believe that if MI6 or "the Increment" had done it they wouldn't
have had the slightest problem getting the body out of the flat and covering up the whole episode.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.