Abstract

Background

Potting media are commonly used by growers in different parts of the world for potted plants, raising seedlings and for improving soil characteristics. This study was conducted to characterize bacterial communities occurring in 13 commercial potting media products originating from seven countries.

Conclusions

The study shows the isolation of some potential plant and human bacterial pathogens. However, most of the isolated species were either biocontrol species or saprophytes. The study questions the ways by which these bacterial species were introduced into potting media. To the best of our knowledge, this appears to be the first report of most of the isolated bacteria from potting media, except B. pumilus.

Keywords

ContaminationPhylogenyPotting media16S rRNA

Background

Soil in arid areas of the world are known be poor in fertility and structure. This motivates growers to use various biological and chemical amendments to improve soil in their fields. Potting medium is a growing medium suitable for the establishment and development of a wide range of plants in containers. Several types of potting media are imported from European countries (Al-Sadi et al. 2011). They are mainly used for growing potted plants such as citrus, mango and ornamental plants as well as for the germination of several vegetable crops before transplanting into fields.

Studies provided evidence that potting media may harbor some plant pathogenic fungi (Al-Sadi et al. 2011; Al-Sa’di et al. 2008). In addition, potting media can also be an important source of several beneficial fungal species that can be used as bicontrol agents or as decomposers of plant residue material (Al-Sadi et al. 2015; Al-Mazroui and Al-Sadi 2015). However, limited studies addressed the occurrence of bacterial communities in potting media (Whiley et al. 2011; Lindsay et al. 2012).

Using molecular technologies, the studies of microbial ecology have been made easy (Querido et al. 2013). Studies have shown that sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene is an important molecular tool for the identification of bacterial species (Jagielski et al. 2014). This study was carried out to characterize the bacterial communities in potting media originating from seven countries. Knowledge into this area may help understand the potential occurrence of plant pathogenic bacteria and other bacterial types in these growing media.

Results and discussion

Detection of bacteria in the potting media products revealed that all products contain at least one species of bacteria, except for product #13 (Norway) which was found to be free of culturable bacteria. Densities of bacterial colonies were generally very high, ranging from 8 × 107 to 1.2 × 109 colony forming units per gram of substrate. The four products from Germany were found to contain different types of culturable bacteria, with product #2 having the highest number of bacterial species, which was 4. Commercial products from the other countries contained 1–2 culturable bacterial species (Table 1).

The single most parsimonious tree generated from maximum parsimony analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of 20 bacterial isolates from this study (SQU P001–SQU P020) and 54 bacterial type strains obtained from the GenBank. The bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site. Numbers of bootstrap support values ≥50 % based on 1000 replicates

In previous studies, some bacterial species such as Bacillus species (Huang et al. 2012), and Legionella longbeachae (Koide et al. 2001), have been isolated and identified from various potting media or their ingredients such as compost, vermicompost and peat. Three bacterial species found in this study, including B. pumilus (Reddy 2014), B. vallismortis (Zhao et al. 2010) and R. spathiphylli (De Clercq et al. 2006) have been used as biological control agents. Moreover, P.thivervalensis (Achouak et al. 2000) is pathogenic to plants, and S. warneri (Kloos 1980) and R. pickettii (Stelzmueller et al. 2006) have been reported to cause diseases in humans. The other species, including L. lichenia, C. gallinarum, A. livingstonensis, B. phenazinium and K. flava have been previously reported from lichen (An et al. 2009), chicken (Kämpfer et al. 2014), moss-covered soil (Ganzert et al. 2011), soil (Bell and Turner 1973) and air (Zhou et al. 2008), respectively.

Differences in bacterial species composition and densities among different products could be related to differences in raw material from which the substrates were produced as well as differences in processing between different companies. For example, substrate #2, from which four bacterial species were recovered, was produced from different material (white and frozen black peat) (Table 1). The origin of bacteria in potting media products could be from the original plant waste products from which the potting media were produced (Messiha et al. 2009) or they could have been introduced during the processing or packaging of potting media (Al-Sadi et al. 2011). However, future studies might be required to investigate the source of contamination of these commercial products of potting media.

Conclusions

Our study reveals the association of different types of bacterial species with potting media, with some being potential pathogens of plants and humans, while others are potential biocontrol species or saprophytic species. To our knowledge, this is the first report of culturable A. livingstonensis, K.flava, L. lichenia, B. vallismortis, B. pumilus, S. warneri, B. phenazinium, Burkholderia sp., R.pickettii, R. spathiphylli, Rhodanobacter sp., P.thivervalensis and C. gallinarum from potting media.

Methods

Collection of samples and isolation of bacteria

In this study, 13 samples of potting media from different European countries were obtained from Sultan Qaboos Sea Port (Table 1). Each sample represents a different company. Bacteria were isolated using serial dilution technique on nutrient agar media (NA, OXOID, England, UK). In this technique, a sample suspension was prepared by adding 1 g potting medium sample to 10 ml sterile distilled water and mixed well for 15 min and vortexed. Each suspension was serially diluted 10−1–10−4. Then 0.2 ml was pipetted from the 4th dilution onto NA media, spread with a sterile glass spreader and incubated at 28 °C for bacterial observation. Bacterial colonies which appeared different in morphology or color from each other were transferred to new NA media. Eventually, the obtained isolates were maintained on NA slant agar at 4 °C as stock culture.

DNA extraction and PCR

For DNA extraction, single bacterial colonies were transferred to nutrient broth in 1.5 ml broth and incubated in a shaker (120 rpm) at 28 °C for 48 h. Total genomic DNA was extracted from all bacterial isolates using GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For PCR amplification, the 16S rRNA gene fragment was amplified using the universal primers 518F (5′-CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACG-3′) and 800R (5′-TACCAGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) using PuRe Taq Ready-To-Go PCR beads (GE Healthcare UK Limited, UK). Thermocycling was carried out with the following conditions: heating at 95 °C (2 min); then 40 cycles of 95 °C (40 s), 60 °C (1 min) and 72 °C (1 min); and a final extension step at 72 °C (10 min). The PCR products were sequenced using a commercial sequencing service provider (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea).

Phylogenetic analysis

Sequences of each isolate were refined using BioEdit sequence Alignment Editor (Hall 1999), in which the sequences obtained from reverse primers were transformed to the reverse complement orientation and aligned with the sequences obtained from forward primers to obtain consensus sequences. To analyze the relationships of the isolates to known bacterial species, the 20 sequences from this study, 53 sequences of type strains which had the closest relationship to the isolates and Aquifex pyrophilus (type strain Kol5a) as an outgroup were initially aligned using the Clustal W Multiple alignment (Thompson et al. 1994), checked visually and improved manually where necessary. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene using the parsimony optimality criterion was performed in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 1998). Gaps were treated as missing data. Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was conducted by heuristic searches consisting of 1000 stepwise random addition replicates and branch swapping by the tree-bisection-reconnection algorithm. For each MP analysis, 1000 bootstrap replicates using a heuristic search with simple sequence addition was performed to assess statistical support for branch stability.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AMA designed the experiments. HAA, SSA and IHA conducted the experiments. AMA, AN and HAA analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge Quarantine Officers (MAFW, Oman) for their help in supplying samples of potting media products. Thanks also to Sultan Qaboos University for financial support of the study through SR/AGR/CROP/13/01 and to VALE Oman for their support through EG/AGR/CROP/12/02.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.