Wind power breaks down in Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia's electricity supply needs to get a lot more
sustainable---it's the law. The Environmental Goals and Sustainable
Prosperity Act demands that within six years we use more than twice as
much electricity from renewable sources as we do now. And wind is an
obvious way for us to get there.

Unlike the province's other potentially major green energy source,
tidal power, wind power is a mature technology that's already serving
communities around the world. This blustery province has the physical
potential to be one of the world's wind energy hotspots, and because
it's sparsely populated there are plenty of places where planting
windmills won't disturb people. Yet today only one percent of Nova
Scotia's electricity comes from wind, and while many projects have been
proposed and accepted, only a fraction of them ever come online.

One proposed wind farm site is south of the Bras D'Or Lakes in Cape
Breton, on a 1,000-hectare wetland and hammerhead-shaped lake. Lake
Uist is a beautifully rugged area, home to eagles, bobcats, owls and
many other wild animals, as well as spiritual home for the Eskasoni
Mi'kmaq. Luciano Lisi, the project developer who was also producer of
classic B-movie horror flicks like Island of the Dead, wants to
put 44 new wind turbines around Lake Uist, producing 250 megawatts of
energy---four times Nova Scotia's current wind production.

So what's the problem?

Actually, there are a few. There are serious environmental concerns
about the backup hydro Lisi plans for when the wind isn't blowing, for
instance. And the power grid needs to be upgraded to carry energy from
rural Cape Breton to homes and businesses in the rest of the province.
But these could be overcome, if the province and Nova Scotia Power
could only see that a little investment now will save us all a lot of
money down the road. Still, there's community opposition.

"This area has been used by Mi'kmaq for hunting, trapping, gathering
and medicines for a very long time," says elder Albert Marshall of the
Moose Clan, who lives in nearby Eskasoni. He says the Mi'kmaq must
protect the land and water from such development.

Marshall's problem isn't with the windmills. He's concerned about
the hydroelectric station that accompanies them. Using hydro and wind
allows for storage of wind power during low-demand hours. When the wind
is blowing but there isn't much demand, the wind power is used to pump
water up hill, to the lake; when the demand is high but the wind isn't
blowing, the water runs back downhill, through the hydroelectric
station, to generate the needed electricity.

"It solves the important problem of wind variability," explains
Lisi.

Hydro is a great backup, but Eskasoni, the Mi'kmaq and
environmentalists challenge the location. The status of that Crown land
and water is under negotiation with the Mi'kmaq First Nation.

"The Mi'kmaq are not anti-development, but this project is nowhere
near green," Marshall says.

The Ecology Action Centre, which is generally pro-wind, agrees. "We
are in favour of the proposed wind energy portion of the project," an
EAC statement says. But EAC is concerned that the hydro portion as
originally proposed would destroy the wetland, leach methyl mercury
into the lake (possibly poisoning drinking water), create "probable
disastrous effects for the aquatic ecosystem" and punch access roads
through fragile wilderness.

The EAC suggests that "electricity can be stored in water reservoirs
that are less ecologically sensitive, such as abandoned mines and
quarries...as compressed air in caverns, or at a smaller scale in
batteries or fuel cells."

Lisi disagrees. "Our project will have no effect on the lake, that's
just idiots talking," he says. He says he's jumped through every
environmental hoop, including impact assessments with the province and
feds. He plans to break ground by 2010 and to gain EcoLogo
certification, North America's highest green standard.

The Lake Uist proposal shows why only one percent of Nova Scotia's
electrical generation comes from wind. You've got your top-down
mega-project, unpredictable wind supply, lack of government
involvement, the power monopoly shutting out a local producer and
you've got strong community resistance.

And if Lisi succeeds, not a single watt of this energy will stay in
province. Despite Nova Scotia's ambitious goal of achieving 25 percent
renewable energy by 2015, it's easier and more lucrative to export wind
power to the United States, because that country has better tax
incentives for renewable energy than does Canada. Lisi hopes to sell
his wind power to power companies in New England, possibly to Long
Island Power in New York.

For its part, NSP is dogged by progressive renewable energy goals
that were laid out broadly by the MacDonald government in the 2007
Environmental Goals and Sustainable Prosperity Act, specified as the
Renewable Energy Standards under the Electricity Act later that year
and upped by the Dexter government in July. Currently, we consume about
10 to 12 percent renewable energy, mostly hydro. (Renewable energy
includes power from any source that can be replenished, such as wind,
sun, biomass, hydro or tidal.) If NSP meets its targets, we'll have
13.5 percent renewables by the end of 2010, 18.5 percent by 2013 and 25
percent by 2015.

To meet these goals, NSP uses the request for proposal, or RFP,
process. It's a cutthroat competition in which the lowest bidder wins a
contract to produce energy at about half the price we pay for coal and
oil. The winner operates on tiny margins and any deviation from the
plan---like, say, a global economic meltdown---means the windmills
don't get built.

"The contract gets awarded and government gets to say so much of our
power will now be renewable," says Peggy Cameron. "But only half ever
actually get built." Cameron is vice-president at Black River Wind, a
Cape Breton wind firm owned by documentary filmmaker Neal
Livingston.

The wind projects most often built are relatively small, under two
megawatts. As a result, of 276MW (almost enough power for all of the
homes in HRM) contracted between 2002 and 2004, only 63MW, or 23
percent of the proposed generating power, actually came online.

Since 2005, another $100 million in wind contracts have gone
unfinished. Now, yet another 246MW of wind has been contracted with six
different companies, but if the success rate holds true we can expect
only about 60MW of that to come online.

NSP has a rosier outlook. "We're completely comfortable with where
we'll be in 2013 and 2015," says Robin McAdam, executive vice president
of sustainability.

The challenge, says McAdam, is the government's requirements that
new renewable energy must be generated by independent power producers,
which are struggling to find capital in the recession. This rule will
change after 2010, allowing NSP to invest directly in wind projects,
giving it the control McAdam says it will make implementation
possible.

Cameron offers another explanation. "This is typical of other RFP
jurisdictions," she says. "Problems are created because people
underbid, they don't understand the real cost, or the cost parameters
change."

Cameron describes a volatile, high risk industry in which only
large, deep-pocketed operations survive. And because the contracts
always go to the lowest bidder, companies throw together ridiculously
lowball proposals and hope the stars align, while more experienced
companies know they can't do it on the cheap. The contracts go to the
lowballers, who can't actually build them at that cost, so nothing gets
built.

The RFP process is widely regarded as a failure among renewable
energy producers, and Cameron's company is a prime example of an
experienced producer that can't compete. "We've been working on a
project in Cape Breton for six years," Cameron says. "It's been
shovel-ready for five years and we haven't been able to get a contract
with the power corporation."

Cameron says NSP is clinging to an antiquated process it knows is
failing. Because of the low-bid madness, wind turbines aren't getting
built and renewable targets aren't being met. To compensate, NSP came
up with an alternate plan and applied to the Utility and Review
Board---our energy regulator---for approval of a 60MW biomass project
with NewPage Corporation.

The biomass application came under heavy fire from environmentalists
and the UARB itself, which called the plan incomplete and poorly
documented. Environmental groups support using sustainable biomass, but
they accuse NSP and NewPage of green-washing---using large-scale
biomass harvesting, including clear-cutting more than 6,000 acres a
year, to meet the province's renewable energy objectives.

McAdam admits that the decreasing likelihood of NSP meeting its 2010
goals was a factor in the push for biomass, but maintains that biomass
is a legitimate renewable energy source. "It is a low-cost way to
convert to renewables---to displace coal but still use the same
equipment." He adds that unlike wind, biomass gives a predictable
energy source that doesn't need to be supplemented.

The provincial government's announcement that NSP must reduce its
greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by 2015 will no doubt keep the
company scrambling for low emission alternatives. In the meantime,
without large-scale biomass on the table, NSP's focus is on purchasing
approved wind projects that were never built from independent
producers. To date, it has purchased seven such projects.

The hand that feeds

To meet provincial goals, we need 311MW of renewable energy
(including wind, tidal, biomass, solar and hydro) by next year, 581MW
by 2013 and 781MW---enough for more than 200,000 homes---by 2015,
requiring about 390 wind turbines.

That's 349 more than we have now.

To get there, the NDP has long supported feed-in tariffs, which are
pretty much the opposite of the low-ball RFP system. Feed-in tariffs
provide a guaranteed price set by the government and paid by the power
company to anyone who can feed the grid with renewable energy. This is
the change wind producers and environmentalists say will shift the wind
back in Nova Scotia's favour.

"With feed-in tariffs you know the rate of return you need," says
Peggy Cameron. "It makes for a secure investment." That opens the
market to smaller producers, which means more windmills, green energy
that stays in the province and fewer coal and oil imports.

The Pembina Institute, a sustainable energy think-tank, says almost
two-thirds of the world's wind energy has been installed because of
feed-in tariffs. They are popular in Europe, especially Spain, Denmark
and Germany.

"You simply go to the bank in Germany and fill out a two-page form
on your project costs," Cameron says. That levels the playing field and
opens the gates to new suppliers. And, according to Cameron, "The
average cost in Germany of feed-in tariffs is only about two euros per
month" over the cost of carbon-based power. She says that initial
increase in cost is easily compensated by improved energy efficiency in
the home and the creation of renewable energy jobs.

Germany invented feed-in tariffs in 1991. Prices were guaranteed at
a set rate for 15 to 20 years. A thriving industry has resulted, with
almost 20,000 turbines, often within 200 metres of people's homes.
There are a quarter-million German jobs in renewable energy, more than
70,000 in wind alone.

NSP says it will work with a feed-in tariff system if it has to. "We
don't really have anything against them," McAdam says. "If government
wants them we're happy to administer them, but the question is what
rate do you set?"

He says that Ontario set the rate at well above market value.
"People there support it, but consumers here are very sensitive to
price."

During last year's provincial election, the NDP promised feed-in
tariffs for Nova Scotia. The party statement on the subject read: "A
rate will be recommended to the Utility and Review Board in
consultation with the renewable energy sector and Nova Scotia
Power."

Energy minister Frank Corbett has since backtracked on that promise,
opting instead for further consultation, assigning David Wheeler, dean
of the management department at Dalhousie University, to "help bring
together diverse audiences and get them to put forward ideas" on how to
reach the new renewable energy targets.

Megan Tonet at the Department of Energy explains that feed-in
tariffs will be part of that discussion. "Support for small-scale
producers is a priority area for government," she says.

But still they must wait as the government conducts further
studies.

Technical difficulties

The case for feed-in tariffs is compelling but even if the
government and NSP do everything right, Nova Scotia won't meet its
legislated renewable goals without first spending a lot of money on the
power grid.

Presently, Nova Scotia can handle about 20 percent renewable energy
with the current grid. Or, rather, the current transmission grid.

"There are two grids," explains Jamie Thompson, a mechanical
engineer and wind-power advocate. "The distribution grid and the
transmission grid."

The distribution grid is made up of the power poles we see in every
neighbourhood, distributing power to homes and businesses. The
transmission grid consists of large high voltage lines that run off the
beaten track, transmitting power from generating stations to the
neighbourhoods.

These high-voltage transmission lines don't always lead to the
windiest places. "With the low-bid proposal system, you have to find
the windiest place close enough to sizeable transmission lines,"
Thompson says. "This tends to be close to the coast, where you have a
lot of settlement."

The result is that people living in coastal communities raise hell
whenever a wind farm is proposed. Even if the project avoids
ecologically and spiritually sensitive areas, like all energy
generators windmills take their toll. They kill birds and bats and are
noisy, they obstruct the ocean view, cause electromagnetic interference
and annoying (some say nauseating) flickering shadows and have been
known to throw off ice and an occasional blade.

Each turbine requires about an acre of land cleared, and wind
projects often require new access roads. In Europe, where wind turbines
have long been common, obsolete towers have been abandoned.

There are claims of chronic health problems from people living near
wind farms, including high blood pressure and heart rates, depression,
dizziness, migraines and memory loss. Some believe these symptoms are
caused when wind turbines emit pulsations, which in turn create
disturbing vibrations in people's chest walls and inner ears.

Wind advocates argue that none of these problems with wind
generation compare to the health and environmental impacts of
mining---Dan Roscoe of Scotia Windfields points to the annual $500 to
$2,000 cost per taxpayer on health costs related to carbon energy---but
the point remains that wind farms often encounter local resistance.

That location problem could largely be solved by expanding the
transmission grid.

"The utility should be legislated to guarantee access to the grid,"
says Cheryl Ratchford at EAC.

That would mean that wherever someone builds a wind-farm, NSP would
be required to build the transmission lines to the farm. And that costs
big bucks. The Nova Scotia Wind Integration Study, released in May 2008
by Hatch, a multinational energy consultant, predicted it will cost
$260 million in costs to upgrade Nova Scotia's transmission system to
become wind-friendly.

Thompson says that is a modest investment given that NSP spends
close to twice that on imported oil and coal each year. He says adding
transmission lines from Canso to Halifax would create much of the
needed wind capacity.

But even with improvements in the grid, there would still remain the
variability problem. Wind is intermittent and doesn't guarantee a
steady supply of electricity. Coal and oil are poor backups because to
switch between them and wind requires reboots of the system that take
several days.

With little hydro available locally, the Hatch study focused on
importing electricity from neighbouring provinces to even out the
supply and demand. The problem, according to lead researcher Robert
Griesbach, is that "Nova Scotia's electricity system has limited
interconnection with neighbouring provinces."

Megan Tonet at the Department of Energy says a lot will depend on
hooking Nova Scotia up to hydroelectric power from sources like the
controversial Lower Churchill mega-dams project in Labrador. But that
project isn't due to come on line until 2015.

The Hatch study concluded we need another study, looking at the grid
and energy ties with our neighbours. That $300,000 study is being
conducted by SNC Lavalin, a multinational energy and engineering firm,
and is expected to be completed in coming months.

A multi-provincial committee has also been struck to conduct yet
another study, a two-year, $4-million study of alternative energy
called the Atlantic Energy Gateway Initiative. The goal is to make the
technological and policy changes needed to allow for the easy flow of
renewable energy from one region to another. If it works, a small
wind-powered community in Nova Scotia will be able to count on hydro or
solar power from New England on a windless day.

But without that interconnectedness with other provinces, power
can't easily flow either direction across the border. Potential wind
power exporters like Luciano Lisi may build turbines, but the power
they generate has nowhere to go. "Until the grid is strengthened with
New Brunswick," says Tonet, "we do not expect to see large-scale
exports of electricity."

So we're stuck in a wind impasse. Small wind companies like
Cameron's and Roscoe's that want to sell power to Nova Scotians can't
do so because they can't get the wind farms built. And big wind
companies like Lisi's that want to export power can get farms built,
but can't necessarily move the power to their out-of-province
customers.

Robin McAdam at Nova Scotia Power says Lisi is just trying to find
the highest value market, and that market will eventually be here. "The
local market for green energy is growing steadily. Higher renewable
targets here means more opportunities here."

In whose backyard?

Peggy Cameron objects to large-scale wind projects like Lake Uist
that fail to help Nova Scotia kick its coal addiction. "Why would
people put up with the industrialization of the landscape?" she asks.
"There is an advantage to having many small producers. It creates
distributed energy and greater flexibility."

Ideally, producers need a means of sharing energy, so if it isn't
windy in Truro, the energy can be accessed from Canso.

Cameron says that the greatest benefit of multiple small producers
is that it makes it easier to put control where it belongs: in the
hands of communities. This is crucial because, as Dan Roscoe points
out, even with Nova Scotia's dismal record on wind contracts coming
through we're likely to double our number of wind turbines in the next
12 months.

"There will be more community opposition," Cheryl Ratchford says.
"Already communities are seeing large scale wind projects and asking
questions. In Europe there is better community buy-in because there is
more consultation early in the process."

According to Cameron, Denmark's cooperative system is the best model
for overcoming community resistance. "Eighty-five percent of their
renewable energy projects are cooperative," she says. "Community
ownership is the key. They see it as money in the bank."

The quintessential example is the self-sufficient farming island of
Samsø, off the eastern coast of Denmark. Its 4,100 residents
have gone fossil-fuel free in just 10 years. The key to its success?
Co-ops.

The island's 21 wind turbines, which provide 100 percent of its
electricity and also feed the Danish grid, are co-owned by the
municipality of Samsø, local farmer-owned co-ops and small
shareholders, including locals and mainlanders. The municipality's
profits are reinvested in renewable energy projects, while farmers and
shareholders are free to keep theirs. The cooperative arrangement
provides a steady source of revenue for the whole community and
increases acceptance of the turbines. You're unlikely to hear anyone on
Samsø complain about the high cost of energy---the higher the
better, in fact.

That mindset is the polar opposite of the typical attitude here,
where politicians get elected placating energy fears by offering
subsidized heat and electric, protecting us from the big bad power
company.

Imagine if we flipped that trope on its head, got inspired by
Samsø and created a co-op model in the Canadian heart of the
cooperative movement: Nova Scotia. Imagine wind farms owned by some of
the same people who have been fighting them: rural communities, farmers
and First Nations' band councils. Imagine municipalities reinvesting
wind profits into energy security programs for low income families and
energy efficiency programs for everyone. Imagine residents owning
wind-shares and putting wind-dividends in their pension plans. Imagine
using wind energy where it's generated instead of shipping dirty coal
up from Colombia.

Environmentalists argue that green energy is cheaper in the long
run. But in the short term, with our grid needing an upgrade,
renewables will cost more per unit than we pay now. As the Department
of Energy and NSP amble toward our wind energy goals, they will take
that concern seriously.

"Their biggest fear is rates going up," Roscoe says. "But by doing
nothing they are ensuring rates will go up. The status quo will
give the worst possible cost to consumers. It's basic economics: the
cost of fossil fuels are going to go up as supply goes down."

Price does matter, especially for people walking a fine budget line
and choosing between heat or canned beans in the dead of winter. As
Matt Lumley, another communications officer at the Department of
Energy, puts it, "Cost goes up and it's hard for low-income people and
the businesses that employ Nova Scotians."

True. Unless of course they belong to a community that owns a little
wind farm, or work for a company selling power into a better, greener
grid.