This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the FAQ and RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate and remove the ads - it's free!

Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

Originally Posted by Mr.Nick

I'm not opposed to civil unions, however the context within the US Constitution used to justify such a concept is amateur at best and downright stupid at times....

Basically there are a bunch of fools in judicial districts which of whom could give a rats ass what they're reading because the statues and amendments are quite clear - yet these pro-gay want these 3rd grade words redefined as if they're partaking in a common core class.

Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

Originally Posted by AGENT J

1.) no need to apologize for your post being wrong, people make mistakes and my beliefs like yours are meaningless to facts, I haven't stated my beliefs to you in this thread lol
2.) meaningless to the fact its not a states issue, LMAO please stay on topic instead of trying to deflect
3.) see #2
4.) see #2
5.) facts, laws, rights and court cases prove them to be false, my beliefs play no role in this fact

your post fails and fact win again

I'm blocking you again for rewriting my post.... I freed you Django - then you went right back to ****ing with my posts..

Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

Originally Posted by disneydude

LOL....that presumes that you are in a position to be able to make that judgement. If you haven't read or cannot comprehend the Court's position in Loving, then I think that such a presumption is flawed.

In other words, you got nuthin'. And you are just another that's fallen into the "Loving" trap and don't have what it takes to admit that you are wrong about it. Obviously, you need to ignore that "Loving" is completely different, because you want so very badly for it to fit your argument. But it's a case about race, not marriage, which I'm sure you know, not even that deep down, but... you... just... can't... face the truth. Carry on.

"We have met the enemy and they are ours..." -- Oliver Hazard Perry
"I don't want a piece of you... I want the whole thing!" -- Bob Barker

Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

Originally Posted by Anthony60

Yeah, like what? 58 years later. Gee, I hope that wasn't too inconvenient for anyone. No big deal.

Which is still better than having left it up to the states themselves, where it would have been longer, evidenced by the fact that segregation is still on the books in at least one state and interracial marriage bans were just removed from SC and Alabama constitution/laws around 15 years ago.

"A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt