--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I also followed the rules.
> Which, if not following the rules is the
> rule, you could say I dislike following rules so I didn't
> follow the
> rule about not following rules...
>
> ;-)
Rulebreaker! We shall have to devise a new rule to deal with lawless types
like you!
Padraic
>
>
>
> On 09/06/2011 10:48 AM, R A Brown wrote:
> > On 06/09/2011 15:35, Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets
> wrote:
> >> On 6 September 2011 16:19, Patrick
> >> Dunn<[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hrmph. I was a good little rule follower
> and
> >>> responded with just a number, even though I
> *really*
> >>> wanted to list them.
> >>>
> >>> Apparently, I was the only one.
> >
> > No you weren't! There were at least two of
> us :)
> >
> >>> That's what I get for following rules.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Frankly, you've been on this list for quite a
> while, and
> >> this is not the first survey here.
> >
> > Indeed not - I've answered this question posted in
> different
> > wording at least twice before - probably more.
> >
> >> By now you should know that we *never* follow the
> rules.
> >> You might even call that the... rule :P .
> >
> > In this case, 'twas easier to follow the rule. When
> > languages are actually quoted, they tend to get longer
> with
> > each person's postings ;)
> >
> > It depends what one means by "study" - I could rattle
> of a
> > whole long list, since I've been 'studying' as many
> > languages as I could lay my hands on for the past 67
> years!
> >
>