I don’t know why people didn’t like Kate Middleton’s portrait. I thought it was fine. now portrait artist Paul Emsley responds to the vicious criticism, saying, “I am still happy with it and am getting on with my life. There is nothing I would have changed.” Good for you, Paul.

A guy took a small video camera into Disney World and made a movie. People wondered if it was legal. I wondered what’s the difference between that and a family video-cam, neither of which will likely make any money. Now a Columbia law professor weighs in: “Escape from Tomorrow” is a cut-and-dried fair use case. Told ya.

Jane Boursaw is the founder and editor-in-chief of Reel Life With Jane. Her credits include hundreds of print and online publications, including The New York Times, People Magazine, Variety, Moviefone, TV Squad and more. Follow her on Twitter at @reellifejane.

I have to disagree with you here on the Kate photo. This woman is so beautiful, at least on tv and magazine covers. This horrible portrait by Emsley not only does an injustice to her beauty but reveals nothing about her personality, intelligence or sense of fun. She also looks at least 45 here. Where are all these creases and wrinkles from? They’re fine when you’re old enough to deserve them but why make someone look older than they do in person? It’s just a boring, blob of a portrait. And is that nose Jimmy Durante’s? He can have it back.