tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post1297459155626149546..comments2013-05-07T10:04:01.724-07:00Comments on Chromium Blog: The Future of JavaScript – take a peek today!Google Blogsnoreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-59547256724211747962012-02-23T11:51:33.212-08:002012-02-23T11:51:33.212-08:00This will see early adoption in IE via Google Chro...This will see early adoption in IE via Google Chrome Frame.<br /><br />;)Peter Sitterlyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05513910453292285558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-27982106275391761372012-02-13T16:27:49.340-08:002012-02-13T16:27:49.340-08:00I&#39;d love to see a great transition plan so Joe...I&#39;d love to see a great transition plan so Joe Developer can start using this. <br /><br />I could see Google or others offering a public CDN/proxy that caches scripts and serves the ECMAScript Harmony to capable browsers (detected by an Accept header, maybe) and backwards-compatible compiler output to others.<br /><br />Really, you could provide all sorts of bells and whistles in a CDN model, not just an ECMAScript shim. Could minify, GZip, set caching headers, bundle scripts, use edge servers, etc. Process LESS/SASS. With a google.load() sort of interface you could make it easy for devs to toggle between minified and unminified code.<br /><br />Getting carried away with the ideas. But excited some ECMAScript features are in the pipeline, and will be more excited when I can use them. :)randallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04270395955627579493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-50649161402117372652012-02-13T09:26:56.048-08:002012-02-13T09:26:56.048-08:00Perhaps the post should update the words &quot;lex...Perhaps the post should update the words &quot;lexical&quot; to &quot;block&quot;<br /><br />http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:block_scoped_bindingsrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14401916337192530246noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-29721969053328749622012-02-13T06:55:46.807-08:002012-02-13T06:55:46.807-08:00nice blog Thanks for sharing. sesli chat siteleri ...nice blog Thanks for sharing. <a title="sesli chat siteleri" href="http://www.voicechatsites.com" rel="nofollow">sesli chat siteleri</a> was really very nice.ekle paylashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01656771447085512489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-88554447056620173122012-02-11T17:24:57.746-08:002012-02-11T17:24:57.746-08:00Collections are good and needed..Collections are good and needed..Mahesh Subramaniyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11159881247260318905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-17006463424761567992012-02-11T03:37:14.134-08:002012-02-11T03:37:14.134-08:00Why don&#39;t we just replace Javascript with sand...Why don&#39;t we just replace Javascript with sandboxed Lua instead of turning it into a hacky Lua clone?⬡https://www.blogger.com/profile/15728390359795931865noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-63537424213434528032012-02-11T02:32:53.180-08:002012-02-11T02:32:53.180-08:00I thought you guyz were banking on DART?I thought you guyz were banking on DART?MumJashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07051024113628638443noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-81130816727216396252012-02-11T02:11:52.568-08:002012-02-11T02:11:52.568-08:00@Darth, you cannot usually &quot;shim&quot; langua...@Darth, you cannot usually &quot;shim&quot; language extensions, unless they are purely library extensions. If you could, there wouldn&#39;t be a reason to extend the language, would there? ;)<br /><br />The only features from the list that could be back-ported to ES5 are maps and sets.Andreashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12974886035161948883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-60340175402998354372012-02-10T23:25:10.446-08:002012-02-10T23:25:10.446-08:00@Phil some of this stuff could work even in IE, se...@Phil some of this stuff could work even in IE, see https://github.com/paulmillr/es6-shimpaulmillrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13410473184539743268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-38582371637376379922012-02-10T22:59:08.932-08:002012-02-10T22:59:08.932-08:00Why can&#39;t we just go with AS3? It has all this...Why can&#39;t we just go with AS3? It has all this suport, plus still suports dynamic (non-strict) features. It has been in the real world for a while, and has a large community of experienced developers already.SteveMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00118625014378498936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-27226951951047237132012-02-10T22:52:22.623-08:002012-02-10T22:52:22.623-08:00Proposal: Replace JavaScript with Scheme per origi...Proposal: Replace JavaScript with Scheme per original design.MCAndrehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10025555896996100599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-23073323145947853592012-02-10T14:19:04.485-08:002012-02-10T14:19:04.485-08:00Can&#39;t we just make Coffeescript a native brows...Can&#39;t we just make Coffeescript a native browser language? ;)Jonathan @ jadbox.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12431411201884986208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-22740711358441942612012-02-10T13:31:13.285-08:002012-02-10T13:31:13.285-08:00So, would there be anyway to make this stuff work ...So, would there be anyway to make this stuff work in Internet Explorer. Surely, it won&#39;t be native until, at least, version 11.Philhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12119534787059839275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-8194812931833867882012-02-10T12:47:15.275-08:002012-02-10T12:47:15.275-08:00The binary data stuff strikes me as the biggest ne...The binary data stuff strikes me as the biggest news of them all. JavaScript is a very odd language in it&#39;s lack of standard binary data processing support.Christopher Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13820642342200638732noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-60657515125168506262012-02-10T10:47:08.609-08:002012-02-10T10:47:08.609-08:00When will these features make their way into Googl...When will these features make their way into Google App Script?russell.millinerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03588459943020402292noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-58907904351676988752012-02-10T10:45:17.479-08:002012-02-10T10:45:17.479-08:00The truest, most awesome future of JavaScript is a...The truest, most awesome future of <a href="http://cyborg.blogspot.com/2009/08/javascript.html" rel="nofollow">JavaScript</a> is artificial intelligence, in <a href="http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/AiMind.html" rel="nofollow">English</a>, in <a href="http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/Dushka.html" rel="nofollow">Russian</a>, and in other languages. <a href="http://code.google.com/p/mindforth/wiki/JavaScript" rel="nofollow">JavaScript</a> initiates the basic AI for other programming languages to pick up and run with.Mentifexhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04530921525903314824noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471378914199150966.post-82141045424787572452012-02-10T09:37:30.602-08:002012-02-10T09:37:30.602-08:00Is it possible to get a script include (non third ...Is it possible to get a script include (non third party, but directly from Chrome team, so that it matches how and when V8 develops the new features) on browsers that dont have the matching experimental versions of javascript/syntax to have better interoperability? Like a shim. I think there are a couple of random ones floating on the web/github but far from useful. Unless people only use Chrome, it will be hard to justify use of the new proposals unless we can get some way to start writing code with a script include.Darthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18198259589859988699noreply@blogger.com