MoS should have released December 2012. There is not competition in December

Except for The Hobbit

__________________Before SHH, your miserable, insignificant little life was laughable. Now that you've found SHH, have you noticed you've become more popular? Suddenly EVERYONE wants to hang out with you.

Once again, i ask the question WHY THE **** DIDN'T WB RELEASE THIS IN JULY ! ? ! ?

If they released it in July it wld have to compete with pacific rim.

Personally I think they got the best they cld.May was out thanks to Ironman,July was out thanks to Pacific rim but they have the advantage of releasing it on supes anniversary in June.At least thats how i understand it

Well they are both WB films. Basically they had a choice, MOS or the Hobbit. I am kinda glad they decided to push it back, gives more time to market the film as well as work on the CGI. Last thing we want is another GL marketing failure. They didnt do anything until a month or so before release.

Well they are both WB films. Basically they had a choice, MOS or the Hobbit. I am kinda glad they decided to push it back, gives more time to market the film as well as work on the CGI. Last thing we want is another GL marketing failure. They didnt do anything until a month or so before release.

You do realize I was implying what you're saying, yes?

__________________Before SHH, your miserable, insignificant little life was laughable. Now that you've found SHH, have you noticed you've become more popular? Suddenly EVERYONE wants to hang out with you.

Have you seen Monsters Inc? It's in the ranks of the Toy Story franchise and Finding Nemo. Not to mention it's upcoming 3D rerelease. There's going to be hype for it, and it will influence MOS' Box Office heavily. Poor planning on WB's behalf.

Well I know is not Pixar but Dream Works Rise of the Guardians hasn't been doing so well so maybe that'll happen to Monsters University, although I suppose ROTG isn't coming off a successful first film. But it has been long time since Monsters Inc.

They should have given use something a bit more unique with the MoS teaser.

It was basically the same old. Nothing to really set it apart from the other stuff for general audiences. No hook to draw them in to care besides the Nolan name.

I'm getting the impression that Pacific Rim will be WB's baby next year. They will promote the hell out of it.

MoS is the film that no one at WB wanted but they were still forced into making it. I think the promotion for the film will reflect that. That's also likely why they carelessly tossed it into June.

I agree that we should've gotten more whilst I liked it, it was quite weird tbh. I do feel they should have gone with the Con footage maybe trimmed it down a little but I do feel it was a missed opportunity however I think if the next trailer us kick ass it really won't matter.

Guess we'll have to wait and see, I mean Avengers wasn't expected to be the 3rd highest grossing film of all-time but things happen so we'll find out next year.

That's why these are called 'announcement teasers'...they're meant as announcements that the film is coming. I also think the campaigns behind some upcoming Summer 2013 tentpoles are adopting some old-fashioned techniques...not showing so much, so early. You know...the way things used to be.

All of Warner Bros. Summer tentpoles are their 'babies.' Things will begin to 'pop' for both films in December. Take a deep breath.

Your last statement is rather full of inaccuracies that I'm not going to qualify here...

Look. No one can predict the future (or box office), but as William Goldman also so famously said about this industry: "Nobody knows anything." The film itself will prove whether it deserves an audience...or not (usually).

__________________CS/SHH!: Well in the first film...(Bale sees the guy asking the question is wearing a Superman T-shirt.)

Bale:Are you doing that on purpose? You woke up this morning and went "right." (laughing)