Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Sir Enoch, posterity salutes you

As England burns, let’s reflect on some of the warnings Enoch Powell provided over forty years ago.

“As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood". That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century.”

He then gave a picture of what the average Briton would face by the end of the century.

“For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country. They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted.

"On top of this, they now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by Act of Parliament; a law which cannot, and is not intended to, operate to protect them or redress their grievances, is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions."

The net effect would be a “total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history”

For this stunning perspicacity and honesty he was threatened with prosecution and hounded out of his Cabinet position. His career was finished. Long-standing friends abandoned him. The ‘conservative’ London Times described his words as ‘an evil speech’ calculated to ‘inflame racial passions’.

Compare what Powell said with the drivel the multi-cult establishment fed us. We all live together happily in a magic kumbaya land. Tell that to the terrified residents of North London and elsewhere.

Fittingly, I’ll leave the final words to the great man himself.

“We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.”

161 comments:

Anonymous
said...

You know, looking back on a previous post, I have just created a new word to be added to the English lexicon.

... based on a combination of "enema" and "education" ... it is defined as having an unfortunate truth which has been ignored for years, finally stuffed up your rear end with enough force and depth to bring it -- at last -- to your notice.

These beasts clearly see that we are weak, defenceless, cowed by political correctness, and do not have the will to stop them. Even when they smash our cities to bits, effeminate and female journalists will wring their hands and pretend not to notice the racial animosity being directed against us. They would rather their whole country were destroyed than commit heresy in the eyes of their middle-class peer group.

As the third-world population grows, so the frequency and severity and ubiquity of these kind of incidents will grow. Until we face the truth that races are different, and that allowing third-world non-whites to settle here is literally destroying us, nothing can ever change.

Gentlemen, when they attack their own neighborhoods with petrol bombs, when they have every policeman in the city massed in a couple of commercial streets, when all attention if focused, laser-like, "over there", what is to stop an entrepreneurial fellow from visiting an adjacent and undefended apartment block/council house and expanding the conflagration?

Indeed, one could travel, unquestioned, unchallenged, carrying a petrol bomb openly with complete racial anonymity with a balaclava pulled down over one's face and a black hoodie pulled up, antifa style. When they act out like this it is their own people they leave completely defenseless and utterly unprotected. And anything--ANYTHING--that happens will be attributed to their own selves, even if it is the utter destruction of their own dwellings and businesses. There will be no investigation, no "did you see anyone suspicious", on a night like Tottenham. Any destruction that occurs will be attributed to their own mad, mass bloodlust and never, ever sorted out.

So what ARE the targets of interest in their ghettoes that a group of five or ten anonymous masked humans could approach without being challenged? An Islamic center with a radical imam? The ghetto business of a particularly craven Englishman?

Rather than see their attacks on their own shopping districts as scary for US, we can make them scary for THEM. Think of their riots as creating a completely anonymous free fire zone in which no manner of wrong will ever be investigated or personalized.

Unfortunately, these riots always happen at the wrong time; that is, never just before an election.

I mean, if these riots were occurring, say, just one week before a general election, then maybe a few people would wake up to the pointless lib/lab/con status quo.

Is the BNP a realistic or reasonable alternative? I don't know but, apart from UKIP possibly, what other realistic choice is there?

You will no doubt hear a load of guff from mainstream politicians about how all this must be addressed, but the brontosaurus in the room - mass ethnic immigration over the last couple of generations - will not be mentioned.

@UN please ad Verwoerd to your great statesmen . As siener Van Rensburg said , they will trample old England to mud , somehow I do not feel the need to rejoice and feel sad for my English cousins . I hope they have the courage to take back their country from the bankster infestation that they fail to see .

Nice dilemma for the Guardian yesterday. Showed a white rioter on the front page. But then they must have got second thoughts. The deprived underclass are blacks, so lo and behold, replaced by a black rioter on the later editions.

What will it take for the politicians to listen to us and stop the imposition of multiculturalism on us? Tourists come to the country enthralled by its heritage to come across a capital that is now rightfully dubbed Londonistan and parts of the country that look like it belongs to the subcontinent. I'm Canadian. Father's English. Mother's Ukrainian (among other) Wife's Chinese. My son was born here in Germany but can't get German citizenship. Damn right. Compare London during the blitz to that of today. Why are the British so cowardly that they refuse to stand up for their heritage, culture and values? Why have they just opened the gates to all and sundry without bothering to consider the consequences? And if you question the fact that this tiny island is the most densely-packed country in Europe, at least 30 millions over the optimum population, you are labelled a racist. How is it that England, that once conquered 1/4 of the globe, has allowed others to make such a shameful conquest of itself?

"So what ARE the targets of interest in their ghettoes that a group of five or ten anonymous masked humans could approach without being challenged? An Islamic center with a radical imam? The ghetto business of a particularly craven Englishman?

Rather than see their attacks on their own shopping districts as scary for US, we can make them scary for THEM. Think of their riots as creating a completely anonymous free fire zone in which no manner of wrong will ever be investigated or personalized."

The following is from Inspector Gadget's blog. He is a cop in England.

http://tiny.cc/wvcqf

We have heard about the armoured vehicles in Clapham, which cleared the street in minutes. We want to carry out a baton charge at a line of angry youths who are setting fire to a huge wheelie bin in the doorway of a post office, but we are told to ‘hold the line’.

At the briefing, many of my officers wanted cast-iron guarantees from Silver Command that no individual officers would be suspended and prosecuted if we use force and a rioter became seriously injured.

This was not forthcoming. There are at least 12 County forces here now, ‘Remember Tomlinson’ was being whispered everywhere at the FCP.

Many people are becoming very angry that we refuse to move our lines and baton charge the rioters. I have run around like a blue arsed fly trying to understand why we are being ordered to stay static; the only explanation I can find is that Gold Command are concerned about the sensitivity of the target group.

The scenes in front of us give a physical proof of everything we have ever said on this Blog about lack of consequences, weak criminal justice systems, nonsensical diversity policies which give ‘victim status’ to the mob and silly, target obsessed politically driven ACPO leadership. I never thought I’d see the results of all that actually burned on to the streets in front of me.

My final comment for the moment at 06:48 Hrs is that whatever you have seen on the TV, the reality is much, much worse. Front line police officers have been desperately trying to highlight the inherent weakness of our policing system for years. As I have said many times: Police State? Don’t make me laugh.

He's probably right, you know.

It's a PC-Jobsworth's State, run by local council bullies who'll fine old ladies hundreds of pounds for putting a sweet paper in an organic rubbish bin.

I cannot help but wonder how many high-visibility jacketed, pen and notebook carrying, spot-fine-issuing council officials have strutted up to rioters and slapped a littering fine on them ...

You could count them on the fingers of one thumb.

And these are the council bullies that everyone's afraid of. I wonder where they are?

I have to admit I was wrong to slag off the police who don't act against the thugs. It's their ACPO bosses who should be swaying in the breeze

A Paddy in Japan giving you the view here. My Japanese friends are simply gob-smacked that Britain let in millions of 'wild monkeys' as they describe them. The very idea of polluting the country with such creatures is, quite literally, beyond their ken. I've seen two blacks - that's right, two - in Tokyo in the last year or so. Watch and learn.

I wonder if the police have been told to go soft on the rioters until enough White thugs join in to have their pictures on the front pages of a few of the main papers. When the powers that be think they can get away with the lie that race wasn't an issue, then they'll clamp down hard.

The great man is not only vindicated, his dark prophesies have been surpassed.

Yesterday, I watched some aerial footage of London burning. It looked as though some foreign power had lobbed bombs onto the city. The whole thing is more reminiscent of the Blitz than a mere riot, if you ask me.

Since Mr. Powell's time, the lurking brutality of The Invaders has been supressed by means of the dole, consumerism, lenient to non-existant law enforcement and never-ending appeasement by the native British.

But now the animal spirits manifest themselves... like a beach ball pressed under the water, they shoot to the surface and the sight sure isn't pretty.

The only good thing about it: I'm sure many Brits are joining the ranks of those "who see", as we speak.

The only thing stopping black's chimping out is brute force. White people who have lived besaide these savages for centuries, i.e. South Africans and the American South, always knew that. But that was all stopped about 40 years ago. Look at the results.

However, I don't believe that abandoning the possibility, at least, of effecting major political or social change via the ballot box, is the way forward either.

It is possible for enough people to actually rid themselves of sheep-like attachment to mainstream political parties - and there is at least some success with that in various parts of Europe. Currently not in the UK, but that can change.

For the record, I've been voting UKIP for as long as they've been around, but seeing as I'm currently back in South Africa, I obviously can't vote for anyone in the UK until further notice.

According to a comment on Sarah Maid of Albion, Powell also said this in 1976.

"Yet even though that picture is dark and darkening, there is one factor which has not yet been injected. I do not know whether it will be tomorrow, or next year, or in five years; but it will come. That factor is firearms and explosives. With communities which are so divided nothing can prevent the injection of explosives which we know perfectly well from experience in other parts of the United Kingdom and the world. At first there will be horrified astonishment, and inquiry as to what we have done wrong that such things should be happening. Then there will be feverish endeavour to find methods to allay the supposed grievances which lie behind the violence. Then follows exploitation by those who use violence of the ascendancy they have thus gained over the majority and over authority. The thing goes forward, acting and reacting, until a position is reached in which—I shall dare say it—compared with those areas, Belfast today will seem an enviable place."

My father was stationed in England during WWII. He has shared stories about how Brits would give him (a Southerner) a hard time about America's "race problem,"and the unfortunate the plight of America's Negro race. Imagine his glee back in the 80's when the Brixton race riots were in full swing. I recall one of his exact comments: "And the Brits used to say 'We don't have a Negro problem.'"

"But what forces motivated them then? And what forces motivate those who promote the multicult today?"@ anon 5:42 a great question. Back then ideas such as Enoch's shouldn't have been greeted with such antagonism. In today's world such a statement by a politician might even qualify as "hate speech". that men such as Enoch saw down that road and were willing to speak only shows how pathetic today's crop of "leaders" actually are...here's another one worth remembering as well..."I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." George C, Wallace

A female Sky reporter was interviewing a white guy who had had his shop burned... He said to her, "The arsonist and looters were all black." She said to him, "Surely you can't say that..there must have been white guys there as well." He thought about it and said, "Ok, they were not all black, I was the only white guy there. Is that OK?"

This guy stated this with a totally deadpan face without a hint of concern for the pc faux pas he caused.

She again corrected him and stated nervously "You can't they were all black!" He responded with "But they were... I was there!"

Unbelievable. That one interview describes the state of our society in a nut shell.

Krokodil 19:42 I don't believe that abandoning the possibility, at least, of effecting major political or social change via the ballot box, is the way forward either.

You really think so? I read recently a report about a government website where Britons could post petitions, and, if they got 100,000 signatures, Parliament had to debate the matter. The specific subject being reported on was the reinstatement of the death penalty, which, according to the report, is favoured by 80% of the public.

Questions:

1. Do you think the 80% public support will carry any weight at all? Or that it is reflected in the Commons?

2. Do you know whether there are similar petitions for debate of immigration, or European Union membership? What public support would there be for such petitions? Would it make any difference?

3. Instead of a petition for a Parliamentary debate, is there any way to force a referendum? Or, failing that, at least a debate on a referendum?

As you know, the death penalty is supported by very nearly 100% of the public in South Africa, but our moral superiors in the Planet of the Apes - sorry, Parliament - have rejected it out of hand. Do you really think their enablers in Britain will be any different?

What's to be done? Well, here's a thought. The riots at Watts in LA were getting out of control, when several other towns and cities in the US decided to ensure their security.

What did they do? They requested that their various National Guard units set up .50 calibre M2 machine guns with ammunition on the rooftops bordering the ghettoes and the more-civilized suburbs ... with standing orders to shoot all looters.

The result ... zero fatalities and a lot of nogs walking very carefully and slowly ... hands in plain sight.

Which reminds me. I know legal firearms in England are pretty much verboten. What are the laws regarding bows and arrows? Particularly crossbows?

Sort of like Soweto brought to your front doorstep, isn't it? Think people will get the lesson, that this is what white South Africans had to deal with?

In the bigger picture, one wonders if the London riotings, and the flash mobs in the USA, and the farm murders in the rainbow nation of SA are not part of one big offensive?

I cannot help but wonder how many high-visibility jacketed, pen and notebook carrying, spot-fine-issuing council officials have strutted up to rioters and slapped a littering fine on them ...

Perhaps there is a "lesson learned" in the London Riot. Say, that if the system is unable to deal with the current situation, how would it be able to deal with things if nationalists got out in the streets? Or is there a double standard here (as to be expected), that rightwingers rioting would be met with the full force of the state apparatus?

I think I made it fairly clear in my last post that I agree with what you're saying (Kulak), about changing society from the ground up, as it were, rather than hoping for the necessary changes via the ballot box.

Let me try and explain a little further.

Specifically, the only real choice available to us - the electorate - in a "democracy", is getting rid of politicians we don't like (and quite often not even then, as their connected cronies send them of to the House of Lords or a cushy job in the EU, in the case of the UK, for example).

Furthermore, in a country like SA even that voter choice is effectively null and void, due to the racial make up and voter ignorance in the country.

People often hope that voting a new party in will result in all their desires being met; unfortunately, politicians either lie or disingenuously push those parts of a manifesto that were lurking in the background during election time, upon being elected, to the detriment quite often of policy proposals that they were pointedly championing during the same period.

Now, having said all that, I referred to the possibility of effecting significant political change via the ballot box. I'm certainly not suggesting it's a given, as the weight of history and experience goes against that. Please bear in mind I am specifically referring to the UK (hence references to the BNP and UKIP).

(I'm aware I also referred to societal change, and not just political change - I added that as an afterthought; in hindsight, I should have left that out - though, in fact, political systems that are vastly different from what preceded tham have certainly effected societal change as well).

When referring to political parties such as the BNP, and possibly UKIP, as being maybe more relevant voter choices it is based on this:

1)they generally encapsulate the views on this blog, and others like it, far more than the mainstream parties;2)they are viciously attacked (well, the BNP at any rate) by the political mainstream, the MSM and many other quarters of society - most unfairly, in my opinion;3)and very importantly, from my point of view, they tend far more towards moral absolutism, as opposed to the moral relativism of the political mainstream.

On that last point - fixed morality as opposed to evolving morality - I consider to be the biggest social or societal challenge facing the West, and specifically Britain, today.

It is because of moral relativism that the West is in a state of decay, in my opinion, and the abandonment of Christianity in favour of an increasingly aggressive humanism has done Britain no favours in recent decades - again, in my opnion.

Unfortunately, there is little moral direction in today's society, be it from the church, media, government (ha ha) or anyone else we might normally rely on. Indeed, we have almost reached a stage where the state has made it illegal to teach children the moral absolutes taken for granted not so long ago.

So, yes, let's change society (work from the ground up) and not pin our hopes on the ballot box, but let's also not discard any other tool at our disposal. And if there are political parties that encapsulate moral absolutes, as opposed to the wishy-washy, let's try and please everyone, agenda, then that kind of visible leadership or authority should not be despised.

Would the politicians of these so-called "far-right" parties be as corrupt and disigenuous as the bulk of the mainstream currently at Westminster? Possibly (please don't mention Kilroy-Silk!), but bear in mind, they are sailing into the wind and not conveniently with it.

Because of the UK's first-past-the-post system, it will be more difficult to effect political change there than on the continent but, as stated before, there has been at least some success on the continent for anti-multicultural parties, and the lack of success in Britain, whilst discouraging, does not automatically mean it will be the case forevermore. People on blogs such as these often refer to the electorate waking up from their slumbers; well, it is to that which I refer.

Sorry, I know this has been very long-winded - I wish I could sum up my thoughts far more concisely - but let me put it in a nutshell if I can: 90% I agree with yourselves, Uncle Nasty, Corkonian or whoever else about changing society to change the government. Absolutely. But societies in the so-called democratic age can make some difference at the ballot box as well. Why abandon the ten percent?

my localpaper showed 20 photographs on one page of the rioters in wolverhampton. one was of a white youth, and the caption helpfully pointed out he was white, two photographs were of asian youths and once again this was pointed out. the other17 photographs were of black thugs, but nowhere was the word"black" used

This rioting means nothing. The libtards will continue to be libtards. We will continue to have our opinions.If anybody is expecting enough people to change their minds and join us then you will be waiting a very long time.People don't change their opinions.Change is achieved when one side or the other is willing to fight to impose their views on the others.That's it. That's all there is.

As for the niggers rioting. They aren't doing it for any political reasons. They aren't doing it cause they are feeling the pain. They are doing it for the laugh. They are able to do it because modern technology enables them. There's nothing more to it.

It makes me sick to see these liberal hand wringers searching for a reason. Many of them (being in the media or other immigrant/minority support jobs) are doing it to keep themselves in jobs.

Do you all know that when our generation is old or gone then the chance to reverse the multiculturalism genocide visited upon us will also disappear?As for us? The rioting has given me some insight. I can't see any of us doing anything. Ever.

It's a bit of a departure from my idea that there will soon start a fightback. Someone mentioned the riots would be a perfect opportunity to action some idea. Nothing happened. This means nobody is out there. I've been waiting and looking. I was sure something would happen. I suppose I was wrong.

But elsewhere anger among residents was palpable. "Of course it was deliberate. No way was it an accident," said one eyewitness. "The driver went on to the pavement and rammed them. He knew what he was doing".

"If the police don't sort this one out quickly, there will be race riots," added the man, who declined to be named, but who has given a statement to police.

BIRMINGHAM—Three Sand Nwords died early Wednesday as they sought to protect local businesses from rioters, showing how the violence that began four days ago in London and spread to the U.K.'s other big cities is stoking long-simmering ethnic tensions in some of the country's most racially diverse communities.

The three men who died, all Sand Nwords, were hit by a carload of suspected looters. West Midlands police arrested a man near the scene and launched a murder inquiry. Witnesses said the man, the driver of the vehicle, was an Nword.

The deaths capped a night in which rioting was quelled in London but spilled seemingly at random to other parts of the U.K. In Birmingham, the deaths led to an outpouring of anger from the city's large population of Sand Nwords.

...

Outside the family home of one of the dead men, identified by local media as Haroon Jahan, a group of young Sand Nwords—mainly ethnic Pakistanis—vowed vengeance. "People are very angry," said a bearded man in a shalwar kameez who declined to give his name. "There's going to be retaliation. An eye for an eye."

Local police appealed for calm. "Like everyone else in Birmingham, my concern now will be that that single incident doesn't lead to a much wider and more general level of distrust, and even worse, violence, between different Nword communities," said West Midlands Chief Constable Chris Sims.

...

The wave of unrest sweeping Britain broke out last Saturday in the north London neighborhood of Tottenham, where a peaceful vigil to protest the police killing of a local Nword, Mark Duggan, degenerated into the worst wave of riots and looting in the capital in 30 years. The unrest then spread to other Nword parts of London and subsequently to other cities including Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham.

...

In the early stages of the unrest, the violence was largely confined to Nword areas marked by TNB. That pattern has shifted at times, however, as riots broke out in Gloucester, a market town in western England normally immune to social unrest. Nine people were arrested after a gang of Nwords smashed shop windows and threw bottles and rocks at police vehicles.

...

Dr. Judith Rowbotham, an expert in criminal justice studies at Nottingham Trent University, said relations between the police and some Nwords have been strained in recent times. "There is a feeling that the police are not there to serve the Nwords," she said.

...

Mr. Islam claimed the driver and his two passengers—who he said were all Nwords—had come to the area to loot shops. West Midlands police refused to comment, saying it was too early to connect the incident to the disturbances that affected other parts of Birmingham on Tuesday night.

However, relations between Birmingham's Nword and Sand Nword communities have long been marred by tensions. In 2005 there were full-scale intercommunal clashes after a pirate radio station DJ aired allegations that a teenage girl Nword had been gang-raped by Sand Nwords.

Further to my last ... here is the complete BBC documentary on Enoch Powell -- 6 parts -- each of about 9 minutes.

I had to rub my eyes as the BBC did not call Powell a racist, Nazi, white-devil hate-monger or even imply the same.

Yes, I said BBC.

http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/08/enoch_powel--ri.php

The tone of the article is so unbelievably neutral and non-judgmental of Powell that one would swear that the head of the BBC plus his whole extended family -- including Grandma and the budgie -- had spent this entire year being gang-raped by Somali pirates and only escaped last week.

I must admit that I could be jumping to conclusions as I have not watched all the episodes.

The English, with their blood, sweat, and tears have saved England and it's thousands of years of history for the niggers, Muslims, Jews, and other muds to take over and destroy England from within, as they have said that they will do. Of course it's with the help of the English that they have done so, and not a bridge too far either. Hitler could have been gotten rid of much easier than he was. He was under constant threat of assassination and would have been destroyed soon enough and saner men would have taken his place. There was no need to destroy so much of the white race and the good things related to that race. Whites are suffering the consequences of that folly.

About 15,maybe more years ago I read a sci-fi novel with a most unusual premise.I'm no fan of the genre but this was intriguing.Lee is on the brink of defeat in the Civil War when into his tent walk two time-travelling Africaaners who offer him a consignment of AK47's.(I know,I know,but the premise was fascinating and the book was well written,even in translation.)

Anyway the AK's turn the tide of the war and The South wins.The aftermath of the war is what would probably have happened anyway:slavery withers.

I originally read the book in its German translation,the title of which I have completely forgotten.

Mr A...the book is called "Guns of the South...written by Harry Turtledove, an unabashed liberal...he is big on alternative history, and written a number of books concerning alternative WW 2 and US Civil War ideas. Here's a link to Amazon where you can buy the paperback for as little as .01 cents US....http://www.amazon.com/Guns-South-Harry-Turtledove/dp/0345384687/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1313084551&sr=8-1

[Do you all know that when our generation is old or gone then the chance to reverse the multiculturalism genocide visited upon us will also disappear?As for us? The rioting has given me some insight. I can't see any of us doing anything. Ever. ]

@ Reg... I sadly say I have to agree with you... the next generation of white westerners will be completely brainwashed and indoctrinated by the Marxist PC education system, ghetto dominated entertainment industry, PC MSM, and the Jew controlled media worldwide. Seeing images of white youth who are perfectly fit, stand and allow unarmed niggers to cow them and take their clothes...these are the future of our race, and they already have no instinct to fight back or defy, as they have been completely programmed and spiritually neutered to believe that its "their fault" the niggers are rioting; and will therefore accept any and all indignities and violence heaped upon them. Having read a lot of the comments in most mainstream media outlets concerning the violence in England, absolutely none even hint at anger towards the niggers, few want more forceful police response, and most think the police "did the right thing" allowing the rioters to do as they pleased with a tepid soft response. Most felt "horrible" about the riots, and seemed legitimately guilty for riots inspiration. The same thing happened in LA, and will continue to happen everywhere in the west until there is a backlash, which as I agree with you Reg seems not forthcoming.

Vis a vis the riots: Even "Russia Today" now goes with the flow and claims that the rioters are poor, vulnerable deprived dears whose rampage is a not so silent cry for help.

Today they interviewed two specimens of Erectus who were head to toe clad in brand new Nike, Adidas, etc. Those two had the audacity of claiming to be poor because of "da cuts"...while flaunting at least €300 worth of sportswear.

Going back to the Ruskies: It's the first time I caught that station in peddling such hair-raising falsehoods. I wonder why they are so eager to emulate the rest of the legacy media's lies and prejudices on this.

I read the book, but recall it having great promise and little delivery. The author's obvious anti-South African vitriol was a bit more than I could take.

Turtledove, I am sure you won't be surprised to hear, is a jew, by the way.

Seeing as how we're in the Sci-Fi arena, please let me give you a quote from a more -- how shall I put it? -- Rational Sci-Fi author ... Robert Heinlein.

"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded -- here and there, now and then -- are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people.

Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.

This is known as `bad luck'."

When I think of the utter travesty that Hollywood made of Heinlein's "Starship Troopers", I can only hope that the forthcoming "John Carter" falls on its arse.

Why? Because it's Disney. The last gentile stronghold in Hollywood ... now totally judaised.

Secondly, because of an example of the hebraic logic(?) that dominates Hollywood.

"John Carter" above, was originally Edgar Rice Burroughs' "John Carter of Mars", but because of the utter box office disaster of a recent Disney fuckup called, wait for it, "Mars needs Moms", the powers-that-be at the Mousehouse decided that it would be a bad thing to use the word "Mars" in the title, as it now (in the eyes of the moviegoing public) has bad connotations when combined with "Disney".

So ... what have they done? Removed the word "Mars" which means that the piss-ignorant fanboys -- as well as the great unwashed -- will literally not know that it is a Sci-Fi Fantasy ... let alone that it is based on one of the most famous series of Sci-Fi stories.

I would not attach much attention to what Russia Today says with an issue such as this. RT has a anti-western bias (just like all the MSM in the west have an anti-Russia bias). They love to show how the proletariat is downtrodden in the west.

the next generation of white westerners will be completely brainwashed and indoctrinated by the Marxist PC education system, ghetto dominated entertainment industry, PC MSM, and the Jew controlled media worldwide.

"Not available on Amazon except Kindle" @Mr A...Really?...the link i copied has 224 used paperbacks available for as litttle as .01 USD...of course that was the US website in English...in German i don't know but I will look it up for you...

Well I CAN base it on my own personal experience. My 15 year old daughter literally refuses to discuss anything I say on such issues and says she's ashamed of me etc. I tell you, lifelong indoctrination really works.

Yes Tsnamm,I misread the used books part.Thanks.Mind you,as Kulak has mentioned,the more I remember about the novel,the less I may wish to re-read it.

@last anon.Indoctrination does indeed work,and the current masters make Goebbels and Leni Riefenstahl seem like primitive Soviet propaganda.15 is young but,when your child is older,as I've said before,the threat of disinheritance may concentrate their minds to some degree.

"Well the French got distracted by a war and revolution, and the French back in France decided the French in Haiti weren't being nice enough. So the French in Haiti stopped being as tough as they needed to be. The blacks and mulattos -- do you know what a mulatto is?" "Yes" "Well they rose up and killed the French in Haiti, even the women and children."

"Why did they do that?"

"Well they didn't want to be ruled by the French, which is understandable -- I wouldn't want to be ruled by the French either -- but they didn't understand that the alternative was starving.

"Then once the French were dead, the blacks killed the mulattos."

She thought about this for a moment.

"Well I don't want to help Haitians any more then."

She thought some more in silence, then volunteered: "Maybe we could feed them but stop them from having more babies."

Dunno about that - my 16-year-old nephew and his mates ALL see through the indoctrination and harbor - ahem - shall we say EXTREMELY un-pc ideas! And they continue to gather beneficial experience and intelligence...As Cromwell once remarked, "A few honest men are better than numbers."

After all, England disintegrated for four days. One would imagine that an heroic figure would step forth from the nacht und nebel to rally whites to throw off the multi-culti yoke.

Didn't happen. What we did get was white boys handing their clothing -- and the last shreds of their dignity -- to the N-Words.

So I ask again ... is there any hope?

This from What Will It Take?

Alex Kurtagic

http://tiny.cc/y18zo

My conclusion, therefore, is that we would be ill advised to pin our hopes on the prospect of a future White revolution, like the one prophesized by William Pierce in The Turner Diaries. It could come to that, but I suspect that, barring a serendipitous confluence of circumstances, conditions will not deteriorate sufficiently or rapidly enough to inspire ordinary people — or even an ethnically defined movement — into attempting a drastic overthrow of the establishment before the numbers make the effort quixotic and futile. Some see opportunity in the present economic crisis, but it must be remembered that Germany was ravaged by hyperinflation during 1922–1923, and even during the final stages of economic collapse, Hitler’s attempt at a seizure of power failed. When he succeeded, it was by legal means, through a combination of distinctive style, intensive marketing, economic muscle, and skillful maneuvering against a weakened, unstable, and discredited political establishment. We will have better chances of success by consciously asserting our intellectual, emotional, and spiritual independence, and building a parallel universe — a society within a society — designed around our virtues. These virtues can prosper and strengthen and act as a beacon of superiority as the establishment weakens and falls apart by dint of its own physical corruption and moral bankruptcy.

Broken record time.

Read the Covington books. Small steps are better than no steps at all.

Oh yes ... and invest in metals. Aluminium has been added to the list.

Cheers,Uncle Nasty

PS Amazon UK sales of aluminium baseball bats (at £17.15) increased by 6000% in England in the last week. I wonder if sales of No. 4 shot went up?

A good hickory pick handle or one for a 10 lb. hammer are very reasonable.

"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded -- here and there, now and then -- are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people.

Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty."

Cough, choke..... does that not sound like, ahem, a certain tribe that you frequently refer to?

It has been a hairy few days, I have wrote in the past and continue to write, the migration of millions of criminals and potential criminals into this country is in some ways a perfect excuse to create a police state. In fact a police state is the only way to govern a disparate, degenerate society such as this.

It has been my fear that the government created disaster, would be used, so as to create a situation in which the people of England would cry out for a police state. That seems to be happening now.

James - a lot of people wud agree with you. but it seems that over the last 20 years or the police powers have been weakened if anything. See the earlier comment here from uncle nasty i think where he said police wanted a written guarantee against disciplinary action.

Interesting article on police presence in Eltham at simondarby.blogspot.com Also see sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com : "Whiteout" re disappearing videos of riots from youtube.I have sent her a comment that videos still on youtube can be downloaded then uploaded to sites such as Liveleak,Popmodal.Brasscheck tv and truthtube tv where Google's censorship is absent

Well, their upbringing is a work in progress, and I won't consider myself truly successful in that until the day I have white, racist grandkids.

I think the right time to start talking directly about race is between the ages of 6 and 9, for two reasons. First, at that age they can usually hold their tongues. Second, that's right when a white child's conscience is forming. Below the age of 6 they don't really have one. After that, it's less malleable. And I mostly talk about it matter-of-factly at that age.

When they near puberty, that's the time to turn them into Lions.

Indirectly, my kids get a steady diet of old Disney movies and TV shows from the golden age of white American television -- at the time of their original airing, some of those were subversive; but ALL of them are subversive today, unintentionally. The kids also get a mostly regular hearing of classical music and bluegrass, and take music and voice lessons.

We're somewhat irregular churchgoers (the wife is a believer, but a pragmatic one, indifferent to doctrine) of the Wisconson Evangelical Lutheran Synod. I sent my daughter to their school for a while -- I like the dress code -- but pulled her out when she started worrying she was going to go to hell.

So I have made mistakes already, I know.

I'm not a believer myself, but I like the singing (and have a good voice), and the ritual and atmosphere resonates with me. This was the faith of (some) of my fathers. WELS women don't get a church vote, and the congregation is of course white.

These days the kids attend Montessori schools, as I did. If we could not afford that, we would home school. I will die before I turn them over to the public schools.

I'm having to make this up as I go along, thanks to the derelict, faithless generation that preceded me, so I could of course ultimately fail.

You know I just recalled some American TV hostess who asked, during the Royal Wedding where a million British people managed to flock together with no more than a couple of sleeping policemen on standby (for the Islamic threat at that!), and she asked, "But where are all the Black people?"

Where is the British Queen in all of this? You'd think she might at least muster the strength to utter some liberal platitude urging restraint, but no, not even this. She's absent without leave. Her silence is an abdication. Her privileged position is supposed to be paid for by her willingness to risk speaking truth, even if it's uncomfortable to "her" feckless cowardly Ministers of State. I'm a monarchist, but I am beginning to really hate my Monarch, really hate her.

Incidentally, here is a piece by Theodore Dalrymple from The Australian. He gets it. The riots are a product of the managerial rights based system. The system whose growth the Queen has aided and abetted. I feel sick inside watching all of this unfold.

Elizabeth the twoth will make it all better?

Don't think so. She's too busy consolidating her position in the Bilderbergs ...

Yes, yes, yes. Lawrence Auster is a member of the tribe, but, like Gilad Altzmon, he asks too many of the right questions to be ignored.

So ...

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/

In which we learn:-

1. Why Obama supporters—particularly Jews—stubbornly and unregenerately refuse to see the truth about him

Barry Rubin writes at Pajamas Media:

The hardcore Obama supporter is not watching unemployment levels, the economy, the mess in Egypt and Libya, or the effectiveness of health care reform, His concern is that if he decides Obama is a terrible president it means he is one of “them.” This is a horror he can never accept. For the Jews among them—which explains their higher membership in this group—these factors are reinforced by the image of becoming the very Nazi Cossack Klu Klux Klan monster that is their worst nightmare.

2. British historian says the rioting white “chavs” are culturally black, so that this was, after all, a black riot

Standing against the tide of opinion, the British website Final Conflict supports historian David Starkey’s extremely controversial appearance on BBC Newsnight (“’The whites have become black’ says David Starkey”) in which he boldly brought race to the forefront of the debate about the riots. Starkey was opposed by the two other, standard-leftist guests: a black female author, Dreda Say Mitchell, who said, “We should stop talking about ‘them’ and us’ and realize that we’re all one community,” and by a young white author of a book on “Chavs” who said, “You’re saying that black culture is criminal,”

3. In midst of black riots, British establishment turns its fury against white “vigilantes”

From the website spiked, here is the full story of how the establishment praised south Asians for wielding baseball bats outside their businesses and homes, but denounced white men as fascist, threatening “mobs” for doing the same in their neighborhoods. It was sent by Philip M., who writes: “This is the most powerful article I have read about the riots and the way English people who have tried to defend themselves have been treated by the establishment, media, and police.”

And 4.:-

Police in London were under orders to observe and do nothing

“They also serve who only stand and wait” is a famous line of Milton’s, from his poem about his blindness. The idea is that it is not given to everyone to serve God through heroic action and sacrifice. For some, quiet and patient living according to his will is enough.

No one could have imagined that “They also serve who only stand and wait” would ever become the official policy of a metropolitan police department faced with gangs rampaging, burning, and looting in a capital city. Yet that was the case for four nights in London this last week, as Harry Phibbs writes in the August 11 Daily Mail:

In London the police have been adopting the modern, sophisticated approach of observing while criminals loot and riot. In Manchester they have generally chosen the more old fashioned approach of arresting those involved.

Uncle Nasty - it's not quite correct to say the police were ordered to stand by. Another comment from a policelman on this thread, ormaybe the one on Enoch Powell, made clear that the police would not lay into the rioters unless they got some guarantee against being prosecuted for assault. That was not forthcoming, hence the inactivity.

Uncle Nasty - it's not quite correct to say the police were ordered to stand by. Another comment from a policelman on this thread, ormaybe the one on Enoch Powell, made clear that the police would not lay into the rioters unless they got some guarantee against being prosecuted for assault. That was not forthcoming, hence the inactivity.

13 August 2011 23:01

You are quite correct, Jeremy. I do recall that post. I posted it. I also point out that the police hierarchy refusal to guarantee exemption from prosecution ensured no meaningful activity by the police, the appointed keepers of the piece.

The expected inactivity was by omission, rather than design. But it was there and the results were catastrophic.

You can bet, though, that when the fingers are pointed, one of the press releases will include the phrase: "Lessons were learned."

are the public schools bad in Wisconsin as well? Thought it was 90% white there?

The curriculum ain't too bad. Depends on the school.

And of course there is the pervasive PC. One of the Madison high schools had assigned seating at lunch to desegregate.

Even where the curriculum is good and there are few darkies, it's still a Prussian/Jacobin education system.

And what you can never, ever be to a public school teacher or administrator is a customer.

The People's Republic of Madison, where I was born and raised, is getting worse. But there are hopeful signs the indoctrination is not taking.

For example, at one football game three years back I think, between a predominantly white Madison high school and a predominantly black one, one of the cheers from the partisans of the white school was:

"Food Stamps!"

It is not possible to completely avoid PC unless you home school, but it sometimes provides "teachable moments."

Last year's "Holiday" celebration at my daughter's school featured brief reports on some PC heroes.

They all had something in common: They all had victories over white people. Liberals can find no victory of mud over mud to celebrate. To really prove one's mettle, one must defeat a white.

Go here to see a female SKY News talking head filling her combinations at the thought of a riot victim describing the looters as "black dudes."

The Rainbow Rioters

In this brief clip from Sky News, a reporter interviews a young businessman about his experiences during the recent riots. You’ll notice that she is absolutely unwilling — or unable — to allow him to continue until he affirms the Multiculti Creed, and agrees that yes, there must have surely been some white people among the looters and rioting thugs.

As Vlad Tepes points out, facts are subordinate to the Narrative. Maintaining the Narrative is all-important, far more important than simply reporting the truth.

The Eloi are among us.

Uncle Nasty

By coincidence I picked up a DVD of George Pal's "The Time Machine" a week or two back ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Time_Machine_(1960_film)

Low budget? Man, pretty much no budget. The film cost $850,000.00 in 1960 and is still great fun to watch.

Supporters of Norman Scarth, a colourful local character and ex war veteran from Yorkshire are shocked at what they say is an astonishing sentence metered out to a frail old man for using a recording devicer in a court room85 year old anti corruption campaigner Norman Scarth who claims to be the victim of a conspiracy to silence him by the judicial system was sentenced to six months imprisonment for making a tape recording of a court case from the public gallery at Bradford crown court.The sentence metered out has received widespread criticism and comparisons to rioters who have received 3 months for admitting to assaulting police officers in the Manchester riots.Scarth is said to have made the recording after the court refused to provide hearing aid loops. Judge Jonathan Rose was alerted by a court worker to the recording device that Scarth was using in the public gallery , Scarth was arrested handcuffed and remanded to the cells to be sentenced the next day July 26 at Bradford crown court.Richard Mawrey QC told him that he was a ‘crazed old man. Editors Comment: However one thing remain clear tonight, this is indeed a shocking case where an 85 year old man is in prison for six months for the crime of using a tape recorder whilst rioters have been given bail.

Precisely as we reported yesterday on the back of numerous eyewitness reports, it has now emerged that police were ordered to stand down and let London burn during the first few nights of rioting, an action that quickly led to a frightened public to demand troops on the streets, rubber bullets, water cannons and curfews.

On Tuesday we highlighted the “lackluster police response, with numerous reports from the public that police stood back and allowed looters to pillage both large department stores and private small businesses for hours on end.”

According to eyewitnesses to the initial riots in Tottenham, police were seen “standing back and allowing rioters to cause havoc,” a trend that continued during subsequent nights before Prime Minister David Cameron ordered 10,000 extra police officers to patrol London last night.

I guess the courts were working on the principle that at 85 years old he should know better whereas the youths were sweet and tender hooligans who have learned their lesson and won't do it again (until the next time.).

The issue raised by waterboy - I'd say there's an additional point regarding their advisors. Some of them are most definitely in a conspiracy, others merely incompetent. The 'leaders' then reflect that.

Off topic, but do any of you music guys know of a version of Moonchild that has an organ doing the main backing. I'm talking about the Rory Gallagher Moonchild.

Maybe this ...?

http://tiny.cc/i7gxr

BTW Anonny of 17 August 2011 15:47, I merely included the Placebo video as a contrast to Kate's original. Yes, the imagery is of a collection of chavs and chavettes, but I find the musical contrast interesting.

Health worker Rabi Saaka appeared at the tribunal in an attempt to bring her two daughters — whom she has not seen for nearly ten years — to the UK from Ghana.

Miss Saaka, who now works for the Southern Cross care home group, arrived in the UK as a visitor in 2002 but never left. In 2008, she married an Irishman, thereby giving her the right to stay as the dependent of an EU citizen.

The relationship has since broken up. She told the tribunal that she had ‘always wanted’ to bring daughters Aisha, 16, and Naima, 18, to join her in London (they had been cared for in Ghana by their father, who had since died).

Henna Akbar, for the Home Office, said there were doubts that she could support them financially and questioned if her husband would offer any support, despite assurances from Miss Saaka that the pair may reconcile in the future.

She said: ‘The evidence suggests that they will not get back together because she does not even know where he lives. The indication is that the relationship has completely broken down.’ And she added: ‘The sponsor [Saaka] has not visited her children since 2002. There is nothing stopping her from doing so.’

But their lawyer Albert Faluyi appealed to the judge to reunite the threesome, arguing: ‘If the appellants are not allowed to join their mother here, that is likely to lead to disproportionate consequences compared to the need for immigration control.’

Interesting about that "Irishwoman". seems to me that she bigamously, therfore illegally, 'married' this guy. Therefore it was not a valid marriage. Therefore send the conniving btch back on the next plane to the Dark Continent.

Raymond "Ray" Darcy had some woman on today's TodayFM (See what I did there?) programme whose child was not allowed in a creche due to a Halloween costume.Apparently cultural enrichers do not like Halloween due to their culture's view of spirits.Perhaps we should dress as ghosts more often?If they do not like it thay can always go back to the dark continent.

"We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.”

Reading this and you cannt help thinking of

Danny O'Hara, Emma West, Rhea Page.

And Tottenham, croydon and other parts of the UK burning duirng August.