Comments (10)

Its the endemic, chronic weakness of door and ignition locks, and the woefully small total number of key combinations used by the subcontractors who make the locksets for the Japanese manufacturers which cause the theft spike for the rice burners.

Sort of an additional example - if one is needed - of the dedication Toyota, for example, puts into assuring the safety of its vehicles.

As the first poster said, it was a shortcoming of the key designs. I had an old nissan key that would operate any of the three nissans that my family had back in the early 90s. You could literally file the high points of a key down and get into just about any car of the same make.

Before these, it was 80s Nissans/Datsuns. It's because those particular models are easier to hot wire. People don't steal cars because they need a dependable ride; most stolen cars are used for a single ride. It's typical to find stolen PDX cars in eastern Oregon and California.

My solution is to own cars nobody wants to steal. A Ford Escort wagon? I might as well leave it unlocked. AMC Pacer? Get real. Smart cabrio? I admit, it does get locked -- at least when the top's up -- but most joyrider thieves wouldn't touch it for fear of getting laughed at, and considering how hard a sell they are, I can't imagine the black-market demand makes it interesting to pros. Might as well steal a BMW Z4, they're a dime a dozen around town.

Bluecollar - the better question is what is the difference of the clearance rate for vehicles stolen from the general public and those stolen from the popo (there were at least 2 such thefts in the news in the last year)

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269