The televised debate [es] between the two candidates for the Peruvian presidency, Keiko Fujimori and Ollanta Humala was closely followed by social network users during and after: it even created (after many proposals and discussions) the hashtag #dp2011 to follow related tweets, although there were other parallel hashtags such as #DebatePresidencial, #Debate2011 or #DebatePeru.

Such was the interest of local Twitter users that even the Peruvian press dealt with what they said, while simultaneously journalists issued their own analysis of the debate.

The debate bores me. The daughter of someone who has crime on his conscience, crimes like that of the cantuta, uptown etc. and Chavez's doll that only seeks to destroy democracy …Peru is already screwed. I prefer a clean conscience instead of sending my tainted country to hell….

Others commented on the candidates’ proposals, like Brian Tejeda (@signsofbrian):

A crappy debate, minimal level of both candidates, that don't even believe in anything. Masks and interests, nothing more # dp2011

Some bloggers have concerned themselves with selecting the tweets that they considered the most relevant, such as Dinorider[es]. Other blogs did a more detailed analysis such as La Diáspora Peruana[es] andGrupo Perú Futuro[es], the latter highlighting that,

Last Sunday's debate ended without grand surprises, without grand contrasts among the candidates, nor the feeling that it will have significant repercussions on the undecided voter. As is customary in the polemics of our field, the personal references were the order of the day and the fundamental proposals shone for their absence, it speaks not only of the candidates but rather of the people's demand: a show.

The Fujimori-Humala debate has ended in Peru. In a respectful environment the both of their proposals were debated. Many lamented that the people have to choose between two candidates with questionable democratic credentials. However, one must trust in the wisdom of the Peruvian people, who in the last election chose Alan García, with mismanagement in his first presidency but who improved in his second.

Support our work

Global Voices stands out as one of the earliest and strongest examples of how media committed to building community and defending human rights can positively influence how people experience events happening beyond their own communities and national borders.