Advertisements

To read more than 200 comments...

click on the title of any post, it is a link to a separate page that shows all the comments. Scroll down to the bottom of the comments until you see the words newer and newest next to the number of comments on the right, those words are links that will lead you to a new page of comments. :)

Friday, August 29, 2014

Jennifer Aniston picked the wrong time to be promoting a movie. Oh, or maybe Angelina Jolie knew exactly what time to get married. In any event, Jen is out promoting her new movie and is in the middle of a long week of interviews. What everyone wants to know from her since the baby question gets really old really quickly is what she thinks about her former husband getting married to the woman he cheated on Jen with and whether Jen even knew they were getting married. Well, as much as you would like to know the answers to those questions, Jen has made it clear she will walk out of any interview that asks that question. She could walk out of or hang up on some local television station or radio station. If someone on one of the morning shows had the guts to do it she would be forced to answer the question or come up with some kind of response. The problem is the morning shows are all spineless and don't want to miss out on other celebrities to fawn over every morning so ask questions that are vanilla and basic and banal and plain and whatever other term you can use to describe a question that is not really even a question. I can also see why Jennifer doesn't want to talk about it, but it has been a decade and she talks about other guys she had sex with who cheated on her. Come to think of it, maybe she doesn't. The only guy she really talks about or interacts with that she dated is Jason Bateman and that was a long time ago and he had a bit of a substance abuse issue then so maybe she has let that one slide.

71 comments:

I dont understand why people would even bother. They were so long ago, she's been thru a lot of other guys. She doesn't really talk about them so let it be. They dont really sy shit about her. Brange didn't even tell Jon Voight so why would they tell her after all these years?

Why can't they just let it go? I was just dumped, and I seriously don't need to know if my ex is getting married to someone else when I'm trying to move on. I don't even want to know if he's dating.

Besides, as much as I can't stand Aniston, the woman has been in a faux relationship/engagement for the last few years. Doesn't the mini-van majority realize she's moved on and is extremely faux happy? Why do they still focus on Brad? That was 10 years ago.

If I was her I would have banned interviewers from asking me dumbass brangelina questions too. Everybody has moved on except the idiot media. It detracts from the purpose of doing the interviews too-- promoting the movie.

Yeah, I agree with her. It's been 10 years. The feminist in me kinda gets insulted. I feel like because she did not get married again and/or have children, her worth as a woman is still attached to Pitt- thus it still hasn't dropped after all this time and though she has been in a few relationships.

Brad and Heroina are idiots. Jen seems like the only sensible one. If that makes her boring, well, she's beautiful, rich and boring. What a lovely life she has built for herself. And I'm not a fan of any of them.

I doubt Jen cares about what Brad is up to. I think she was dealt a very public blow that forever entangled her. Angelina is a master at public relations, she pulled off a wedding without anyone catching wind of it. She definitely could have kept her affair with Brad quiet until the dust settled. Even the wedding announcement coincided with Jen's movie opening. Not the first time this happened, as much as Angelina won, she's got shades of LeAnn Rimes in there.

For years I found it so annoying & a big turn off when people bring up Jen during a Brad & Angie story. Even some of the people here brought up Jen when Enty posted about the wedding. Why are people so hung up on it 10 yrs later?

If Angelina is pulling off these little digs you have to ask yourself why- if you got the prize in your eyes why do you need to rub the salt in deeper? When LeAnn Rimes acts like this is obvious massive insecurity. Could our ice queen Jolie be deep down insecure? And not big enough to bury the hatchet with the old man - didn't she see Ray Donovan, the kids insisted on Grandpa coming to the birthday party LOL.

I would not want to interview her at all. She is boring and her answers are all fake crap. I am not a fan of hers at all and her movies have mostly been shit even though she has no need to hustle for money. Boring woman way past her prime

It's been 10 years. I doubt she knew anything about it beforehand and if he did call her out of courtesy (which he certainly does not have to do, as when my parents both got re-married, they did not let each other know before hand)--then it is no one's business. They basically want to goad her into a comment that she obviously does not want to make. Let the woman discuss the project she has now.

I agree with one of the posters above, if she was married or had kids the media wouldn't bother. But since she is still single, they hound her.

Also, I think the reason why B & A chose last weekend was because of the Emmy's and the VMA coverage. I really don't think they did it for any other reason. It's been 10 years and I doubt they sit around planning on how to foil JA's premieres or make her life miserable. I know everyone likes to create controversy

With just about anyone else who was dumped 10 years ago, I'd say let it go. But I think Jennifer has done more than her share of manipulating the media, and using Brangelina to keep her name in the spotlight. So I can't feel sorry for her.

They shouldn't at this point, but it's well documented that their biggest moments are released to overshadow hers. I always wonder if there was some behind the scenes showdown between the women that made Angelina want to rub Jen's face in her win.Aniston made the divorce announcement so civil, then Angelina released the happy family photos in Africa immediately thereafter.It's strategic. She doesn't so anything by accident.

I'm sure the timing of the wedding had more to do with taking advantage of Emmy/VMA weekend. The attention of the press was focused on Los Angeles. They were probably also taking advantage of the speculation about Clooney's upcoming wedding. Jennifer Aniston's film release coinciding with the announcement was just the icing on the cake :)No, I don't sympathize with her, she's always used her love life to promote her films (remember her fake romance with Gerard Butler?), so she's a hypocrite to start demanding privacy now.

@SarahMaybe Angelina hasn't forgiven Aniston for lying about the reasons for Brad's leaving her (lying on the cover of 'Vanity Fair', no less: "I never said I didn't want children, I did, I do and I will!").

@Yoj: according to a previous reveal, Aniston and Butler got it on in a limo on the way to their premiere, so unless Enty was fooled, she really had something with Butler. At least as much as one can have something with that guy.

That book and film "The Women" is about a regular housewife whose husband cheats with a much more glamorous woman. They get divorced and he marries the mistress. Years pass, but wounds never quite heal; there's the "will he come back to me?" question always in the air.

In the media's narrative, Aniston is the regular person women can relate to; Jolie is the glamorous homewrecker. We're supposed to see ourselves in Aniston, and we fear that someone way more beautiful can swoop in and steal our man at any time.

It's all a load of crap! But people still buy it and spread it on bread like it's Nutella.

@NomNom83Whatever was or wasn't going on between them, they used it to promote their movie. She uses her private life all the time. I realize that she's far from unique in that and I'm not singling her out as being worse than others, nor am I claiming Angelina is any different. My issue is with celebrities who want to control when the media can and can't ask about their private life. Mila Kunis has been guilty of this, too, lately. You cannot have it both ways.

@teresacrane, I agree! To this day I won't see a movie that either Angie or Brad is in. Brad has made lots of asinine comments about Jen in interviews while he promotes his movies. You know that he isn't saying anything that doesn't have Angie's approval. If they really want the Jen vs Angie stuff to go away, all Brad has to do is stfu about it. I think Jen has handled Brads comments with a lot of grace and class. Team Jen always!

The media will keep with this for the same reason they still do the "Jen's 6 Weeks Pregnant!"-covers. It sells. There are still a lot of bored women out there doing the "Team Jen" thing. I still say the divorce was the best thing that ever happened to her career. I don't think she'd have had that big of a following or opened some of those movies without the fans she gained by being "poor Jen." Her PR/agent guy, Kevin Huvane, milked this IMHO. Not necessarily a bad move. There are a ton of women who can relate to being spurned (or whatever happened to her), so they'd automatically want to take her under their wing or be on her side (or go to her crappy romcoms).

I never got caught up in all that stuff because I wasn't there. I don't know what happened. Were Brad and Angelina screwing while Brad was still married? If they were, was Brad and Jen's marriage basically over already anyway? Nobody knows, so why judge? Same goes for Aniston. Wasn't she accused of doing the same thing with Theroux (he was with some chick, Jen stole him)? I don't know anything about it, so I can't judge.

They're all doing fine. Brad's still a huge star. Angelina is still a huge star. Jennifer is still a huge star. They all have lives better than any of us can fathom.

God everybody get the fuck over it. Can you imagine if every interview contained questions centered around ex husbands and wives? Why do the press think they have to keep dragging that moldy old question up every time? They are the ones that can't let go of this stuff.

Jen/Brad/Angelina are this generations Liz/Eddie/Debbie. The movie magazines kept that triangle going for decades. Next week one of the tabloids will have a heartbroken Jen crying on Brad's mom's shoulder about the wedding. The week after that Angelina will leave Brad because he called Jen to tell her he was sorry about the wedding. Then it will be Jen--alone and pregnant with Brad's Baby while the Pitts honeymoon. They have at least another ten years of great cover stories with these three.

There's absolutely no reason to ask her about an ex-husband who cheated on her over 9 years ago (and extremely successfully I might add which adds salt to the wounds if there are any). It's rude and disrespectful. For all of those people who don't want to see/hear from Jennifer on the day that Brangelina is being featured do your part by not bringing her up. The media is stirring the pot by drawing her into their life while she's promoting her movie.

Advertisement

Search Crazy Days and Nights

Get in touch & Follow us

Advertisement

Labels

Advertisement

Design By

Advertisement

Disclaimer & Privacy Policy

Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.

Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements
Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.