Because Theymos has rigged the trust system so their shit paints my name red and it hides all of their red marks,

So I removed it as their was no point.

Even went and created a new screen name , so Lauda makes it a point to even leave that screen names negative trust .

Here is Lauda's Trust that Theymos aka Lauda has set hidden

See All of that Red Negative Remarks, if that was you or me, it would count against us and show that Do not Trade Message.

But with Lauda aka Theymos, none of the negative shows up because they tweaked the trust settings so they always have zero negative , you have to look at the untrusted feedbacks , which they are the asshats controlling the settings.

You're showing how ignorant you are with threads like this. Our ratings(mine, Lauda, and many others) show up on everyones public posts because we are in Default Trust. Since the forum doesn't moderate scams or scammers, it's kind of like we moderate them. You can view who all is in this list pretty easily. If you need shown how, just ask.

Anyone else who leaves someone a rating is shown on the users trust but its not shown on their posts under trust because a user who left the rating is not on Default Trust. Doesn't mean the rating isn't still there or anything. People just pay more attention to a DT rating as we are considered a little more trustworthy

Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account? There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works. Then again, I tend to underestimate people's ability to be stupid and am surprised daily by same.

Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account? There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works. Then again, I tend to underestimate people's ability to be stupid and am surprised daily by same.

This guy never had any interest to know better. You can check his posts . He was right from the start interested in altcoins and was particularly supporting one: zeitcoin(altcoin).

Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account? There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works. Then again, I tend to underestimate people's ability to be stupid and am surprised daily by same.

The most damning part would be that he still can't post in the correct fucking area the first time. Just take your damn negative trust and move on, stop the smear campaign and grow the fuck up and prove whoever gave you it wrong. I have some bullshit negative trust yet people still do no escrow transactions with me because I have never once fucked someone over, just be above it and move on. Sounds like the truth is you put too much time or money into this account and can't earn from a sig campaign because the rating.

Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account? There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works.

This is another fine example of why the current ranking system is very deceiving and often leads to a fake sense of security and scams. In our case, kiklo is anything but "legendary". He/she/it does not even know the basics of the trust system.

Kiklo, if you genuinely think that Lauda = theymos, then you really are delusional. These little temper tantrums you are having repeatedly are not doing you any favours. Just accept what has happened and move on. You are acting like you have become obsessed with Lauda at this point. Christ man, grow up.

Am I the only one here thinking kiklo is a bought account? There's no way a legendary member could be this stupid about how bitcointalk works. Then again, I tend to underestimate people's ability to be stupid and am surprised daily by same.

OK , explain it to me,

how is it lauda can label me with red ink and when I returned the negative feedback , it goes to the untrusted feedback for her and does not show up when viewed from everyone else account. But hers shows up under my trusted feedback.

Why does she get to label me in a trusted feedback but my replies are hidden in her untrusted feedback.Because the bitch is not trustworthy at all.

Kiklo, if you genuinely think that Lauda = theymos, then you really are delusional. These little temper tantrums you are having repeatedly are not doing you any favours. Just accept what has happened and move on. You are acting like you have become obsessed with Lauda at this point. Christ man, grow up.

Hey , I Tried to move on and the bitch negative rated my new screen name, so how can I move on when the bitch keeps attacking me.

FYI:She refers to herself as a psychotic bitch, I only left off the psychotic.How many other extortionist are allowed to run around like lauda with their negative trust being hidden?

You, sir, are what most of us sane individuals refer to as a conspiratard. You're seeing all these red tags and negative trust because of your profile and account settings. By default, accounts are set to only display trust scores based on Default Trust members of the forums. That's clearly stated on the trust settings page. Second, quit your bitching. In my experiences on the forums, I've only seen people get red tagged because of their incompetence to follow basic instructions and rules.

With all that said, good riddance. We don't need users like you on this site.

Just to explain how you do that (because you don't seem to grasp the basic concepts of forum participation): go to your profile, change your email into some gibberish, then change your password to some gibberish too... and then log off, please.

I am confused that kiklo says that theymos has made trust system a rigged one so isn't the thread belongs to meta??

@Lauda i believe that you have first left the negative feedback on kilko right? If the war started for the scaling issue of bitcoin as a discussion then it should not be negative as everyone has different view on a particular issue, even trolling to small extent can be tolerated. would like to hear why you consider OP to be red tagged as from start before this feedback war started.

Why so many people are against Lauda? What did this person did bad against you?Also trust from simple default trust members has 0 affect on trust rating and on another side it's correct because some people are giving silly trust and some of them are for no readon but as you mentioned correctly, such trust rating is bad at the same time, yes, it has it's negative and positive side.BTW do you think that trust which was left from lauda wasn't correct? If yes, than what do you think, why did he/she do this on you and why isn't lauda giving me red trust me if he/she is so unfair?I want to say, if Lauda is unfair in giving red trust, than why isn't he giving me red trust? I am member of this forum as you.BTW Lauda isn't alt of theymos and on another hand, quickseller said that he/she isn't alt of theymos and I believe because quickseller is saying trust in similar situation, really, if lauda would be alt, no one would be able to stop quickseller's posts against lauda.

Kiklo, if you genuinely think that Lauda = theymos, then you really are delusional. These little temper tantrums you are having repeatedly are not doing you any favours. Just accept what has happened and move on. You are acting like you have become obsessed with Lauda at this point. Christ man, grow up.

Hey , I Tried to move on and the bitch negative rated my new screen name, so how can I move on when the bitch keeps attacking me.

FYI:She refers to herself as a psychotic bitch, I only left off the psychotic.How many other extortionist are allowed to run around like lauda with their negative trust being hidden?

Gregory Maxwell is shitBitcointalk.org trust system is shitWhoever invented it thought shitWhoever has a different opinion about it than me now is also shit.

I'm not the one doesn't understand​ the default trust list and how it works. You have supposedly been here many years just like myself to get that legendary tag yet you act like you don't understand shit. Good riddance to your main account you didn't even understand basics of where to post your threads.

well Theymos is a nice guy but yes if he gives DT spots to cunts & extortionist like Lauda and yahoo then well he too is either involved or unaware about the crimes Lauda does.

Theymos did not put Lauda, nor yahoo in the Default Trust network. Theymos manages and has control of the account called "Default Trust", and would have added users such as OgNasty and Blazed into DT network by adding them to the trust list of that "account", making both OgNasty & Blazed DT Level 1. There are of course more people in DT1, these are just 2 examples.

When those 2 users add people into their trust list, the users added become DT Level 2. So again, theymos did not add Lauda into Default Trust. Blazed did. If you have an issue with that, you should contact Blazed and explain why you think they shouldn't be in DT. Good luck with that though..

Omg reading this thread makes my brain hurt. Should we link these stupid people to that thread that explains how the trust system works here? It seems kind of odd to show a legendary member but seriously I don't think he understands (also a few randoms don't get it but whatever.).

So OP I guess Theymos employing Lauda then firing her is some sort of long con...? What's the benefit there? Pretend to moderate the forum for years and pay yourself minimum wage (I'm assuming, idk what mods make) into another bitcoin address? Seems legit. Theymos definitely has nothing better to do than create alts and make them into staff members, fire them, etc. Actually this whole forum is the exact same as "The Bloody Board" but on a much bigger scale.

I do not think you understand what "corrupt" means. It is not possible for forum moderation staff to be "corrupt", as they are not in a position where they can receive money in exchange for special favors. Unless we are looking at forum staff of high positions who also happen to be managers of heavily promoted businesses on Bitcointalk, but that is another story.