]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/17/moon-landings-vs-9-11-which-is-more-fake/feed/3856141Marooned 5 – Were the Russians hacked – by Russians?http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/15/marooned-5-were-the-russians-hacked-by-russians/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/15/marooned-5-were-the-russians-hacked-by-russians/#respondMon, 15 Oct 2018 08:02:10 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=856107The same old deceptions from the 1960s apparently work today. Does anybody believe this space comedy?

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/15/marooned-5-were-the-russians-hacked-by-russians/feed/0856107Neil Armstrong never lieshttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/12/neil-armstrong-never-lies/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/12/neil-armstrong-never-lies/#commentsSat, 13 Oct 2018 01:20:10 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/12/neil-armstrong-never-lies/Sure he lies by omission, but he chooses his words carefully so that he never has to lie.

Start at 10:30.

Why anyone believes man went anywhere near the moon in 2018 defies all logic.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/12/neil-armstrong-never-lies/feed/2856097NASA Shadowy lieshttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/08/nasa-shadowy-lies/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/08/nasa-shadowy-lies/#commentsMon, 08 Oct 2018 13:28:39 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=856065Bart Sibrel is one of the only anti-NASA researchers who doesn’t mention flat earth. I think he believes in an advanced space program, which doesn’t make logical sense. Maybe watching his own videos will help him change his mind that we can barely get a rocket off the ground, let alone set up advanced far away colonies.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/08/nasa-shadowy-lies/feed/3856065Moon hoax shill showhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/05/moon-hoax-shill-show/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/05/moon-hoax-shill-show/#respondFri, 05 Oct 2018 17:06:35 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/05/moon-hoax-shill-show/A group of controlled opposition showing how meaningless one can make a 9 minute media piece, all selling a different version of the lie that man can go to the moon, and that the moon is even a 3d place one could actually set foot on.

The moon landings are even less believable than the 9/11 hoax. Maybe they would be a better place to start with non fakeologists.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/10/05/moon-hoax-shill-show/feed/0856055So Over The Moon – Another a$$-true-not implying the truthhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/08/30/so-over-the-moon-another-a-true-not-implying-the-truth/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/08/30/so-over-the-moon-another-a-true-not-implying-the-truth/#respondThu, 30 Aug 2018 09:25:15 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=855488I know this American Life is mainstream, and the interviewer may know the truth that no man can or will ever probably go to the moon, whatever it is.

Listen to this audio and hear Frank Borman implying quite clearly that he in no way went to the moon. As these ass-true-nots age and slowly lose their (blue) marbles, it’s clear that the secret that must have eaten them from within that they didn’t go anywhere isn’t as important to them as they prepare for death.

One of the astronauts, Frank Borman, was saying things I had just never heard an astronaut say. Like this–

Frank Borman

Space science fiction still bores me. I’ve never seen– what’s the name of that– that very popular–

Emmanuel Vaughan-lee

2001?

Frank Borman

Yeah, all that crap. I’ve never seen any of that.

David Kestenbaum

Emmanuel, the filmmaker, also seemed amused. He pressed on. What about when you were a kid?

Emmanuel Vaughan-lee

And what about the stars or astronomy?

Frank Borman

No.

Emmanuel Vaughan-lee

None of that?

Frank Borman

Airplanes.

Emmanuel Vaughan-lee

Airplanes, and airplanes only.

Frank Borman

Airplanes, and airplanes only.

Emmanuel Vaughan-lee

Wow. Wow.

Frank Borman

And a certain particular girl.

Emmanuel Vaughan-lee

Susan.

Frank Borman

Yeah. So–

Producer David Kestenbaum tells the story of an astronaut who returns with a very unexpected view of the great beyond

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/08/16/rollos-moon-buggy-mashup/feed/3855265Buzz slips – a bithttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/07/26/buzz-slips-a-bit/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/07/26/buzz-slips-a-bit/#respondThu, 26 Jul 2018 09:25:13 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=854940He does and he doesn’t. Either way, he plays the crazy a$$-true-not role where his fellow actors never did.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/07/26/buzz-slips-a-bit/feed/0854940NASA’s output is all poophttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/31/nasas-output-is-all-poop/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/31/nasas-output-is-all-poop/#commentsThu, 31 May 2018 12:23:39 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/31/nasas-output-is-all-poop/Another non explanation of how defecating in space would work if there was such a place to go. Looking back over the years of reporting on NASA fakery, it’s amazing how little the nonsense stories have changed. They either work well or no one is listening. I choose the latter.

This certainly isn’t the number one perk about space travel: going number two.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/27/alan-bean-tribute/feed/0854322A$$-TRUE-NOT Alan BEAN escapes his 50 year liehttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/27/a-true-not-alan-bean-escapes-his-50-year-lie/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/27/a-true-not-alan-bean-escapes-his-50-year-lie/#respondSun, 27 May 2018 10:18:15 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/27/a-true-not-alan-bean-escapes-his-50-year-lie/It’s amazing how long you can live with a lie without it killing you. I’d say then remaining fake moon walkers are a hardy bunch.

Amusing pin story, coupled with his painting of the fake moon shots, complete with moon dust.

In painstaking detail, he re-created what it was like to be on the moon, using actual moon dust and ground-up remnants of Apollo spacecraft. Before starting each painting, he would spend weeks studying photographs and videos, and calling fellow astronauts to probe their memories.

Those materials and memories are what Bean brought back from the moon, but he also left something behind — his silver astronaut lapel pin. He had thrown it as far as he could into a crater.

He said he thought about it often, “and when I look at the moon at night, think about that pin up there, just as shiny as it ever was, and someday maybe somebody will go pick it up.”

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/27/a-true-not-alan-bean-escapes-his-50-year-lie/feed/0854318What’s behind the a$$truenots?http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/20/whats-behind-the-atruenots/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/20/whats-behind-the-atruenots/#respondSun, 20 May 2018 16:37:30 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/20/whats-behind-the-atruenots/Simon doing what he does best.

“EXPLAINING” the transparent Apollo 11 ass-true-nots

It is quite amusing (or tragicomical) to read the various “explanations” offered by self-professed film/video experts for the transparent Apollo 11 asstronots…

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/20/whats-behind-the-atruenots/feed/0854239The transparent a$$-true-NOThttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/17/the-transparent-atro-not/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/17/the-transparent-atro-not/#commentsThu, 17 May 2018 09:49:41 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=854185Simon’s ability for being succinct, snarky, and smart make him one of the best exposers of psyOps, hoaxes, and media swindles. Social media THIS to all your contacts and ask them if they still believe man went anywhere near the moon.

Sadly (yet this is not to admit defeat!), the repetitive power of this massive, ongoing (multi-billion $) psyop scheme may be its greatest “strength”, as the efforts of normal (inquisitive) people such as this forum’s valiant contributors may eventually wane due to sheer exhaustion. This is hoping we can overcome this natural, inherent weakness of human nature, and keep doing what we’ve done here at Cluesforum for this last decade – lest our children have to “start from scratch” all over again! Whatever will be the case in the future (and however future generations will judge it), I will remain jolly proud of having started this discussion board – with Hoi Polloi’s precious help: we both called it an “experiment” at the time. Well, this (now almost decade-long) grassroot experiment seems to have been, all things considered, a darn good one – and if you’ll allow me to paraphrase an infamous quote, it’s been “a small step for a man – but a giant leap for mankind”.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/17/the-transparent-atro-not/feed/1854185NASA thought gatekeepershttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/13/nasa-thought-gatekeepers/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/13/nasa-thought-gatekeepers/#commentsSun, 13 May 2018 14:04:38 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/13/nasa-thought-gatekeepers/NASA’s biggest role is to gatekeep the wrong belief about the earth, space, and the stars, and to imprint this wrong theory in every child ever born.

I don’t know if Simon’s Tychos model is correct, but at least he has an alternative to the visual evidence we can all observe.

An interesting post on Hubble and Rhodes. I like the part about “recovering the United States.” Was it ever really lost?

“In the 21st century it is high time that independent thinkers break all ties to academia and begin forming our own parallel system of scientific development and achievement.”

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/05/13/nasa-thought-gatekeepers/feed/9854138Oh how they mock youhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/04/25/oh-how-they-mock-you/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/04/25/oh-how-they-mock-you/#commentsWed, 25 Apr 2018 12:36:26 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/04/25/oh-how-they-mock-you/How hard it must be for the NASA believers to defend anything they say.

English: Elon Musk at the panel Tribeca Talks: Revenge of the Electric Car, for the 2011 Tribeca Film Festival. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Elon Musk-y is just another actor given to us to be the icon/symbol/worshipful master of space and tech. Our rulers know that the people need leaders to follow and they gladly provide them, no matter how silly or outrageous they act.

Continuing our series on how the less educated, or more correctly, those not subjected to the Great American PsyOp, see through the lies and do not believe the lies Americans are religious about.

Luke

Yeah, and he just thought that was horrible, that people would want to do that. And it’s not like I’m trying to play the devil’s advocate with him a lot of the time, but I’m, you know– this is a guy that also– just understanding these people do not– I was really surprised about how many of these countries didn’t believe the United States put a man on the moon.

Alex Blumberg

What?

Luke

Yeah, they do not think we put a man on the moon. The Chinese, for the most part, didn’t think we did. Southeast Asian countries. Yeah, I mean, the Africans. Even the Indians, college educated Indians, and they’re like, no, we’re pretty much sure you guys didn’t.

The only major achievement of NASA in the last 48 years (i.e. between 1969 and 2017) has been that of training their ass-true-not actors to act in a considerably more relaxed fashion – as they poop their smelly lies out of their asses. (Simon Shack, December 2017)

As it happened, I ran across a compelling “confession” by Stanley Kubrick to having faked the moon landing, which I knew he had done and therefore found highly plausible. It turned out to be a cleverly staged piece of fakery, where the man conducting the interview is also the director, offering him instructions as to how to respond to questions he is asking in order to convey the intended impression of this actually being Stanley Kubrick actually confessing to having faked the moon landing, when it’s an actor who is simply playing a role. I sent the original out to a large list of correspondents, which I had to retract when I discovered that I had been played by a hoax about a hoax?

I’m still convinced subs are props from a by-gone era. Even if they were real, what use are they today? Why would any navy bother with them in the age of air power?

The submarine ARA San Juan, with 44 crew members, had participated in naval exercises off southern Argentina before departing Monday from the city of Ushuaia for a naval base in Mar de Plata. It hasn’t been heard from since Wednesday.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/11/18/potpourri-of-fakery/feed/6851260AstroNot Scott Kelly asked about Air Bubbles in Space http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/11/05/astronot-scott-kelly-asked-about-air-bubbles-in-space/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/11/05/astronot-scott-kelly-asked-about-air-bubbles-in-space/#respondMon, 06 Nov 2017 00:14:09 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=851136This has nothing to do with the shape of the earth – but everything to do with the liars simulating space travel.

I know this adds fuel to the DBA-discredit by association-of flat earth and NASA lies, but the question is still valid and the Mark Kelly answer still a poor try to cover up a the lie.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/08/27/best-no-moon-walk-rap/feed/0850555It rains solid diamonds on Uranus and Neptunehttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/08/25/it-rains-solid-diamonds-on-uranus-and-neptune/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/08/25/it-rains-solid-diamonds-on-uranus-and-neptune/#respondFri, 25 Aug 2017 14:22:31 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/08/25/it-rains-solid-diamonds-on-uranus-and-neptune/Cosmos really is science fiction. I still think the naming of the wandering light in the sky “your anus” is one of the most crude Masonic inside joke there is from space tales.

Consider this your daily reminder that the solar system is even more awesomely bonkers than you realized: On Uranus and Neptune, scientists forecast rain storms of solid diamonds.

“When the eclipse begins on August 21, the sunrise will be dark, just as Isaiah predicts,” Meade said. “The Moon involved is called a black moon. These occur about every 33 months. In the Bible, the divine name of Elohim appears 33 times in Genesis.

“The eclipse will start in Lincoln Beach, Oregon — the 33rd state — and end on the 33rd degree of Charleston, South Carolina. Such a solar eclipse has not occurred since 1918, which is 99 years — or 33 times three.”

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/07/14/did-the-911-wtc-memorial-flood-for-al/feed/0850026Canada’s newest spacemasons science liarshttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/07/02/canadas-newest-science-liars/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/07/02/canadas-newest-science-liars/#respondSun, 02 Jul 2017 15:36:08 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=849851One clue to the whole lie: they hardly ever speak of “space”. Everything is about motivation, love of science, stay in school, follow your dreams – nary a detail of what’s up there and how to get there. Jenny looks out of shape or at least of bad posture: how is she going to take the gruelling (as we’re told) take off and re-entry?

Space is the top level of the new religion of science. These spacemasons are newly inducted priests used to sell the religion of scientism. Nothing more, nothing less.

You have to know how to keep a secret Jenny 1:01 … the secret is that NASA doesn’t go anywhere and is simply a masonic deception and science motivation institution. Sad that Canada is deeply involved in the stealing of children’s imagination.

and that’s when you said that those “Geostationary sats” (which, as you know, supposedly hover at, we are told, 36,000km / or 22,000 miles above Earth’s equator) have to be “stopped” as they arrive at said altitude. Well, they don’t exactly have to be “stopped” – but more absurdly still, they have to be “braked” from their initial ‘escape velocity’ of 27,000 km/h – to their “Geostationary” orbital speed of about 11,000km/h. Let me explain:

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/05/09/putting-the-brakes-in-geostationary-satellites/feed/0849291A papal process to get back to the moonhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/05/06/a-papal-process-to-get-back-to-the-moon/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/05/06/a-papal-process-to-get-back-to-the-moon/#respondSat, 06 May 2017 14:30:17 +0000http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/05/06/a-papal-process-to-get-back-to-the-moon/More lunacy from the actornots.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/05/06/a-papal-process-to-get-back-to-the-moon/feed/0849238CC19: Disruption is good – satellite hoax, part 3 http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/04/25/cc19-disruption-is-good-satellite-hoax-part-3/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/04/25/cc19-disruption-is-good-satellite-hoax-part-3/#commentsTue, 25 Apr 2017 11:07:33 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=849082Hoi and Head floss (his father!) talk about the great satellite hoax, and all the goes with disrupting one’s ingrained beliefs.
http://septclues.com/theclueschronicle/episodes/CluesChronicle019_2017-04-24_Satellite-Musings-Part-3.mp3

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/03/18/moon-hoax-mashup/feed/2848704Nuclear NASAhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/03/14/nuclear-nasa/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/03/14/nuclear-nasa/#respondTue, 14 Mar 2017 13:07:56 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=848656More proof the nuclear industry is as fake as the space program. So fake that they work together.

Sad that my tax dollars are being shot up in smoke in so many more ways.

Ontario Power Generation’s (OPG) plant in Clarington could soon play a role in fuelling NASA spacecraft.OPG has announced that it plans to work with venture arm Canadian Nuclear Partners, to produce plutonium isotopes to help power deep space exploration.

OPG spokesperson Neal Kelly says there is major demand for plutonium-238 as the global supply dwindles.

“The supply of isotopes is down, much of the previous supply was created by the U.S. nuclear program, which has stopped production,” he explained.

Plutonium-238 is a byproduct of plutonium-239, an isotope used to make nuclear weapons.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/03/01/satellites-are-an-exercise-in-belief/feed/4848552Let’s go back to 1979http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/02/28/lets-go-back-to-1979/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/02/28/lets-go-back-to-1979/#respondTue, 28 Feb 2017 15:06:37 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=848544Who knew the space shuttle was in movies before it was rolled out by NASA in 1981.

The Space Lie Continues Private Corporations like SpaceX and Virgin Galactic are moving in on the space fraud game to replace space agencies and privatize the space lie. Even the charge of national security is granted these billionaires. A brave new world approaches with private corporations holding the keys. What do we actually know about what is called space – Very little in my view.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/02/02/so-much-fakery/feed/0848386CCR41 – The International Space Station Does Not Hold Up to Scrutinyhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/02/02/ccr41-the-international-space-station-does-not-hold-up-to-scrutiny/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/02/02/ccr41-the-international-space-station-does-not-hold-up-to-scrutiny/#respondThu, 02 Feb 2017 10:40:18 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=848390Good discussion about how chrome a key can go wrong.

The ISS Lie – Another NASA Mind Game The International Space Station is yet another NASA construct that does not hold up to scrutiny. Anyone can go look at the endless YT clips that have been created to show the video fraud we are handed to convince us the ISS is real. By the way, apparently anyone can be an astro-not these days – if – they are willing to lie for a living. Real things hold up when examined and the ISS is not one of those (real) things.

NASA Lied About the Moon Landings – It’s Provable The moon landings of the 60s & 70s are among the few false events we can prove. Knowing this also provides insight into other aspects of what is called space and low earth orbit. It seems, currently, that no one has ever been beyond our atmosphere and that space, Sun and Moon have been intentionally Misdescribed. In my view the moon is not a rock in space and could not be walked on even if man could get there. The moon is an illusion but not beca

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/01/04/morgile-on-the-satellite-hoax/feed/1848168Hoi on the satellite hoaxhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/01/04/hoi-on-the-satellite-hoax/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2017/01/04/hoi-on-the-satellite-hoax/#commentsWed, 04 Jan 2017 11:13:10 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=848166Hoi Polloi helps out with explaining how satellites are safer to simulate than actually launch.

“Patrix” and a very in sync Göteborg friend recently came on Fakeologist.com… to discuss their apparently indefensible opinion (which perhaps we might call the “Göteborg defense” from now on?) that satellites must be in existence because they cannot explain the power of signals any other way.Why did they treat their position so weakly? Why did people who claim to have expertise in signals not give one single layman’s explanation or even a technical explanation of how the signals work? They had given themselves at least an hour to speak and said virtually nothing, and Ab easily countered with reasonable opinions that they didn’t wish to discuss.

Have you ever dreamed about living in space? Have you ever marathon Star Trek? Battlestar Galactica? Star Wars? Doctor Who? Then why havent you ever dreamt of being in space with your favorite crew? In this episode we jump off from Destination Dream, and study the possibility that perhaps weve been duped about what space really is. Enjoy.

“…and the internet would slow and then stop.” Hmmmm – now, WHY on Earth would that happen – if 99% of internet data goes through undersea cables? What is something most people don’t know about undersea cables?”Most people probably don’t know that 99 percent of all transoceanic data traffic goes through undersea cables, and that includes Internet usage, phone calls and text messages. This route is also faster than satellite transmissions, by up to eight-fold.” europe.newsweek.com… … 9072?rm=eu

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/11/16/satellites-do-not-exist-as-described/feed/3847555Afro-notshttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/10/22/afro-nots/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/10/22/afro-nots/#respondSat, 22 Oct 2016 17:05:03 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=844109We know humans cannot get out of earth’s atmosphere, at least for long enough to do anything useful.

Space programs are really giant state sponsored human scientific and motivation programs. Reach for the moon, land on the earth (usually with a resounding thud).

Most wouldn’t mind sponsoring this, even if they knew there wasn’t a chance we could go anywhere.

Or would they? Without a lofty goal, who would be willing to pay?

Our controllers know this, and this is why this “noble lie” persists to this day.

Who knew there was a Zambian space program? I suspect that most Africans, screwed by their colonial masters, are much slower to believe.

This latest batch of Afri-nots were flown to, where else, Orlando (Disneyworld). Listen to the story.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/10/22/afro-nots/feed/0844109Kiss9: RV on a roll http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/29/kiss9-rv-on-a-roll/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/29/kiss9-rv-on-a-roll/#commentsThu, 29 Sep 2016 11:52:02 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=836846Your top youtruthers have a great conversation.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/26/lack-of-space-progress/feed/0836805NASA gatekeeperhttp://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/19/nasa-gatekeeper/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/19/nasa-gatekeeper/#commentsTue, 20 Sep 2016 00:28:11 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=829467Lousy audio, but still fun to listen to Bart bash NASA and tell stories about the a$$-true-NOTs.
There’s not much logic in Bart’s approach, since he is sure the moon landings were faked but says everything else NASA does in Low Earth Orbit is real.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/06/spacex-is-bugging-simon-shack/feed/2811183NASA taking control of the narrative v2http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/01/nasa-taking-control-of-the-narrative-v2/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/01/nasa-taking-control-of-the-narrative-v2/#commentsThu, 01 Sep 2016 23:36:44 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=805319It’s time to mock the growing cohort who question everything NASA and its successor SpaceX et al are doing.

What’s the best way to ridicule those that question the narrative? Make a movie, of course.

Capricorn One was the 70s version that made fun of anyone who thought they’d stage Apollo.

Yes, NASA and its entire team made the movie to own the narrative and steer it off a cliff.

If you want to control the opposition, you have to be the opposition, as Lenin or someone who put words in his mouth said.

Please note psyops are managed forever. They can never let the official story go unmanaged or contested.

]]>http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/09/01/nasa-taking-control-of-the-narrative-v2/feed/2805319Black Frosting http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/08/25/black-frosting/
http://fakeologist.com/blog/2016/08/25/black-frosting/#commentsFri, 26 Aug 2016 00:36:15 +0000http://fakeologist.com/?p=797376M2 fans may be happy to note that Miles Mathis says that the earth is flat meme is a psyop to discredit NASA debunkers.

He also calls out Russianvids as the most popular disinfo baker on the topic.