HE HAS A DISABILITY, WHICH IN HIS SPECIFIC CASE ENTAILS BEING DEVOID OF EITHER LEG. IN COMMON PARLANCE, NOT HAVING A LEG TO STAND ON IS TAKEN AS MEANING THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IN QUESTION DOES NOT HAVE A VIABLE DEFENCE. CAN I THEREFORE BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION THE LINGUISTIC HUMOUR THIS COMBINATION OF FACTS MAKES POSSIBLE? VIS-À-VIS HIS CURRENT PREDICAMENT, THE STATEMENT "HE HASN'T GOT A LEG TO STAND ON" HAS TWO MEANINGS, WHICH IS A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF A HUMOROUS STATEMENT. YOU MAY NOW LAUGH.