Galaxy-Quasar ‘Connection’ Defies Explanation

Originally published in Journal of Creation 11(3):254-255, December 1997

Astronomers have known for decades about the strange ‘connection’
between the galaxy NGC4319 and the quasar Markarian 205 (see Figure 1,
below).1 Without any explanation so far,
astronomers are still baffled, and with good reason.

Figure 1 is a reproduction of an isophote image of the galaxy
and quasar made by superposing a number of photographic plates taken by
Halton Arp using the 200-inch Palomar telescope.2
The image clearly shows that a luminous ‘bridge’ connects the
two objects which is distinct and well away from any ‘pixel [picture
element] bleeding’.3

Figure 1: This isophote image of the galaxy NGC 4319 (above) and the
quasar Markarian 205 (below), made by superimposing a number of photographic
plates taken by Halton Arp using the 200-inch Palomar telescope, clearly
shows the luminous bridge connecting the two objects (north is up, east
is left). This photo appears in Arp, Ref. 2 and Arp et al., Ref. 3.

So what is baffling about such a clear linkage between this
galaxy and its apparently close neighbouring quasar? The ‘basic’
problem is that the galaxy and the quasar have discordant red-shifts,
which according to the standard (Doppler) red-shift interpretation means
that the galaxy is receding at a velocity of 1800km/sec, whereas the quasar
is travelling at 21,000km/sec. Thus, according to the Hubble law, the
galaxy is 107 million light years away and the quasar is 12 times further
away at 1.2 billion light years! Obviously, this simply cannot be, because
the galaxy and the quasar are clearly connected together by a ‘bridge’,
probably of luminous gas filaments. They give every appearance of existing
together.

Some critics have claimed that the bridge is only an illusion,
but Arp and his colleagues have staunchly defended the reality of this
connection for many years, and Arp’s photography (Figure 1) has documented
it. Ignoring this cosmological ‘anomaly’ won’t make it
go away! Perhaps red-shifts may not be connected with recession velocities
and so may not be a reliable index to distances in an expanding universe
after all. These are very fundamental questions to our understanding of
the universe. In the words of astronomer William Kaufmann:

‘If Arp is correct [about red-shifts not being distance
indicators], if his observations are confirmed, he will have single-handedly
shaken all modern astronomy to its very foundations. If he is right,
one of the pillars of modern astronomy and cosmology will come crashing
down in a turmoil unparalleled since Copernicus dared to suggest that
the sun, not the earth, was at the center of the solar system.’4

James Waterhouse is thanked for bringing this unresolved
‘anomaly’ to our attention, and for providing the reproduction
for Figure 1.

Newsletter

Thank You!

Thank you for signing up to receive email newsletters from Answers in Genesis.

Whoops!

Your newsletter signup did not work out. Please refresh the page and try again.

Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ effectively. We focus on providing answers to questions about the Bible—particularly the book of Genesis—regarding key issues such as creation, evolution, science, and the age of the earth.