Justice DeLayed

by Walter Brasch

December 21, 2005

Although President George W. Bush is determined to
keep and strengthen even the most odious parts of the USA PATRIOT Act
and to use extralegal methods to extract information about citizens, he
does have a soft spot for one American. The day before the Senate
blocked one attempt to extend the PATRIOT Act and the New York Times
revealed that the National Security Agency was spying upon Americans,
and doing so without obtaining constitutionally-required court
warrants, the President declared that Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas), former
House majority leader, indicted by a Texas grand jury on two felony
counts, is innocent. Not “innocent” as in, “all
persons are presumed innocent until proven guilty,” but outright
“innocent.” Period.

The President of the United States by historical
precedent usually refuses to comment on on-going legal cases. The most
recent “no comment” came in the Valerie Plame case, in
which the staffs of both the President and Vice-President were accused
of leaking the identity of Plame, a covert CIA officer, apparently to
“punish” her outspoken husband, Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
The inconsistency was explained by press secretary Scott McClellan as a
“presidential prerogative.” It may be a
“prerogative,” but it is also nothing short of jury
tampering by a President and Republican-led Congress that appears to be
doing everything in its power to protect an 11-term rogue congressman.

Even if you disregard DeLay’s strong-arm
tactics of manipulation and subjugation, or his brain-dead absurdity in
1998 that people with “foreign-sounding names”—maybe
like the French-sounding “DeLay”?—probably
aren’t true Americans, he’s tainted by his own actions. He
temporarily resigned his leadership position in September after being
charged with money laundering and conspiracy to violate the state
election code. His past legal problems include major
conflicts-of-interest, allowing his own political committees to accept
six-figure corporate “donations,” accepting money from
lobbyists of foreign nations, obstruction of justice, and lying on
federal forms. DeLay, wrote syndicated columnist E. J. Dionne,
“was a pioneer in something entirely new: a fully integrated
political apparatus that linked Republican Party committees, lobbyists,
fundraisers, corporations, ideological organizations and the process of
governing itself.”

The House Committee on Standards of Official
Conduct, also known as the Ethics Committee, publicly admonished DeLay
three times in 2004. The first time was because he offered to endorse
the election of the son of a fellow congressman in exchange for that
congressman’s vote on a key piece of legislation. The second time
was because he “created the appearance that donors were being
provided with special access [to him] regarding the then-pending energy
legislation.” The third time was because he “used federal
resources in a political issue.” In this case, he ordered the
Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Justice, and the
Federal Highway Administration to track down and return Democrat state
representatives to Austin to force a quorum vote on congressional
redistricting that would benefit the Republican party.

The state criminal case against Tom Delay
originated in 2002, almost entirely as part of that redistricting
manipulation. According to court documents, he was a principal force
behind the creation of a Texas political committee that is accused of
illegally channeling at least $190,000 in corporate funds into a state
election, “with the intent that a felony be committed.”
Those financial contributions helped assure a Republican majority in
the state’s congressional delegation. A year later, using a plan
drafted by DeLay and with the House majority leader providing constant
advice, the Republican-controlled Texas House of Representatives
reorganized congressional districts.

In a 73-page memo of Dec. 22, 2003, five attorneys,
an analyst, and a statistician in the civil rights division of the U.S.
Department of Justice said the redistricting violated the Voting Rights
Act of 1965. According to that memo, revealed by the Washington Post
early this month, state officials were aware that their redistricting
plan, compared to other plans, was highly discriminatory. However,
senior Department officials overruled the staff recommendation. Mark
Posner, professor of law at American university and a former Department
of Justice attorney, told the Post it was “highly unusual”
for political appointees to overrule a unanimous finding.

With the earlier election of 17 Republicans to the
House, assisted by funds hidden from public view, and from the new
election in 2004 of five more Republicans in blatantly gerrymandered
districts, the Republicans had enough members to solidify their control
of the U. S. House of Representatives.

The solution to DeLay’s political immorality
wasn’t for the House to reduce his Congressional privileges, but
to redefine itself. In November 2004, the House, voting along party
lines, overthrew an 11-year-old rule that required House leaders to
surrender their positions if indicted. In January, exposed by heavy
media and public outrage, the House rescinded that vote, but voted to
dismiss all ethics investigations if there was a deadlock on the Ethics
committee; that committee usually has a 5–5
Republican–Democrat composition. Three months later, after the
Democrats effectively shut down the committee, the House relented. It
was only a minor problem for the backers of one of the nation’s
most powerful congressmen. Speaker Dennis Hastert (D-Ill.) changed the
composition of the Ethics Committee to include Republicans closer to
DeLay, including two who had contributed to his legal defense fund.

With previous House admonishments and current legal
charges against him, it may be time to rid the nation of this former
pest control officer—except that the President of the United
States says his Texas buddy is “innocent.”
Walter Brasch’s latest books are America’s Unpatriotic Acts; The federal Government’s Violation of Constitutional and Civil Rights, a study of the PATRIOT Act; and ‘Unacceptable: The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina, both available at most online bookstores. You may contact Dr. Brasch through his website, http://www.walterbrasch.com or by e-mail at brasch@bloomu.edu.
Published in the Jackson Progressive by the kind permission of the author.