It was in 2010 when Gates, during his TEDx talk, either let slip or brazenly bragged in no uncertain terms that he and his foundation wanted to reduce the world population. For those still skeptical, a quick search of the investments and efforts of Gates and his foundation show a lion's share of effort and collaboration to be with Big Pharma and Big Ag. More specifically, the Gates foundation acts as a direct line to funnel the [toxic] products of monopolistic corporations into impoverished countries in the name of philanthropy. In return, the corporations are offered both a stable revenue stream as well as a limitless testing ground/population for their products without legal recourse or the prying eyes of the media. However, the world is beginning to catch on to the deceptive foundation's operating model. It wasn't long ago that India gave the Gates Foundation its walking papers to get out of the country and its health affairs. In February 2017 Economic Times of India reported:

“The Centre has shut the gate on the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on a critical national health mission, and possible conflict of interest issues arising from the foundation’s “ties” with pharmaceutical companies is one of the reasons. All financial ties of the country’s apex immunization advisory body, National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), with the Gates Foundation have been cut off."

Gates and his foundation were given 20 days to wrap up their ties and exit their involvement with India’s Immunization Technical Support Unit at the Public Health Foundation of India. The official removal of the Gates Foundation from the affairs of India's public health care came after over a five year legal battle within India's Supreme Court in which the foundation had been on trial for damage their vaccine programs have caused.

Shortly after Trump's presidential win, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was swarmed by reporters while exiting the Trump Towers in New York. Trump was rumored to be considering an independent vaccine safety inquiry and associated commission. At that time Kennedy Jr., told reporters that the point of the commission would to be "to make sure we have scientific integrity in the vaccine process for efficacy and safety effects.” Although no official announcement has been made by the Trump administration of the formation of such a commission or inquiry, rumors have swirled and public momentum has surged in favor of its creation.

The publication STAT, regularly running stories in opposition to informed consent and health freedom, sat down with Bill Gates for a Q&A about his recent meeting with Trump in which Gates had this to say:

“Absolutely!” Gates answered emphatically, when asked if he raised the topic of vaccines with the new president. Vaccines “are miracles and have done great things, and when we get new ones, we can do a lot. That definitely came up.”

Gates attempted to "impress upon the president the danger of confusing the messages around vaccines." STAT continues:

"Still, Gates isn’t certain that means Trump has been persuaded to drop the idea of a vaccine safety inquiry. “There’s a rumor that he is going to do something in that area,” Gates said. “But maybe I and others will convince him that that’s not worthwhile.”"

Gates seemed to be hesitant to believe that his efforts helped convince Trump stating:

“I heard when he saw pharma guys he said he was still wondering about vaccines, but he did mention to them that I’d said to him that I’d looked at it and that they were completely safe and that we shouldn’t raise any doubts about that.”

It has continually been suggested to Trump by many journalists and prominent social media figures that, following meetings with questionable corporate lobbyists or figures such as Gates, the president take to social media or a modern-day live-streamed fireside chat. With these readily available methods the president could update the country, with realtime intelligence, the ways corporations are attempting to jockey for control of US infrastructure, continue their regulatory agency capture, and influence politics away from the best interests of the people. Until the paradigm of information dissemination changes to favor the people, true reporting will continue to be independent flashes fighting to be heard under the vast net of control cast by corporate media funded primarily by Big Pharma, Big Ag, and the military industrial complex.