tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post2224588293521860506..comments2016-12-09T08:22:58.690-08:00Comments on Google Operating System: New SafeSearch Settings for Google Image SearchAlex Chituhttps://plus.google.com/115880905881518206826noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-66790032870218819262013-03-31T09:57:30.322-07:002013-03-31T09:57:30.322-07:00good alternative Yahoo.comgood alternative Yahoo.comBuisness Adverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09194273263007270061noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-54830613276153365072013-03-14T21:22:00.648-07:002013-03-14T21:22:00.648-07:00Its pathetic. I am not searching for porn, but I h...Its pathetic. I am not searching for porn, but I have to use sexually explicit words to carry on with my search of bio-medics as well. Simply waste of time. I fully agree with Mr. Unknown. Thanks to GOOGLE, You people have made it simpler for BING and complicated for USERS.AAhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01168878262812219538noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-75075929742788100542013-02-08T21:35:42.132-08:002013-02-08T21:35:42.132-08:00Saw this story about someone possibly finding the ...Saw this story about someone possibly finding the &quot;top half&quot; of Courbet&#39;s famous &quot;The Origin of the World&quot;.<br /><br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2013/02/07/thrift-store-courbet-origin-of-the-world-other-half_n_2641243.html<br /><br />Since the article didn&#39;t have the bottom picture, or a link to it,I jumped on GIS to do a quick, safesearch off, search for &quot;Courbet&quot;.<br /><br />Guess which image GIS didn&#39;t show. Weirdly, it still pulls up plenty of nudes. <br /><br />What is the point of using a search engine that secretly filters out relevant results while purporting not to be?<br /><br />If I can&#39;t find artists works by searching the artist what is the point? <br /><br />If I can&#39;t trust the results of my searches what is the point? <br /><br />If I have to use another search engine to double check my results what is the point? <br /><br />If a search engine requires me to type in a query so specific I am not actually searching for anything what is the point?<br /><br />You&#39;ve managed to do something that none of your competitors have managed to do. You&#39;ve made yourself less useful.Unknownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10359959052836336254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-36827658756169222872013-01-28T18:25:18.324-08:002013-01-28T18:25:18.324-08:00im not bothered about porn, but i hate the fact th...im not bothered about porn, but i hate the fact that i have to click on every pic to see its information even when i click on the pic the info is water down....stupid, buts that&#39;s Google Jack trohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14220746821685657076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-47183826243095304112012-12-28T07:55:26.641-08:002012-12-28T07:55:26.641-08:00Safe Search Settings Is Necessery For Children.......Safe Search Settings Is <a href="http://www.bestoftrix.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Necessery For Children......</a><br /><br />So I like This So much.....techtrickboxhttp://techtrickbox.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-84258140387304037312012-12-25T11:48:09.143-08:002012-12-25T11:48:09.143-08:00This is pathetic. I want the most relevant images...This is pathetic. I want the most relevant images to my search. If a pornographic picture pops up so what? Maybe it is relevant to me. Really bad move and I hope they bring back the option to show ALL results, not just the bowdlerized ones. Using more keywords does not always work, especially if I don&#39;t know exactly what I&#39;m looking for. Ethan Taliesinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13796494383094980083noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-83620348895763053832012-12-19T00:39:37.491-08:002012-12-19T00:39:37.491-08:00Searching for &quot;hot girls porn images&quot;, a...Searching for &quot;hot girls porn images&quot;, and as result is Ben_Roethlisberger‑300x225.jpg?????????????? Good improvments for a gay. Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02347893606380739364noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-24967206169676386582012-12-15T06:13:52.240-08:002012-12-15T06:13:52.240-08:00&quot;we aim not to show sexually-explicit results...&quot;we aim not to show sexually-explicit results unless a user is specifically searching for them&quot;<br /><br />This is the definition of censorship. Google applies its own filters to the results.<br /><br />Remember stupid user : Google thinks it is better for you not to see any sex. He knows better than you. <br /><br />Who knows what else he will filter out in the future.Simon Majouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15120859432770817509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18157064.post-27472574086439493142012-12-13T16:13:51.674-08:002012-12-13T16:13:51.674-08:00This new algorithms makes it impossible to search ...This new algorithms makes it impossible to search for what I want. If I add xxx to my search term, the results will consist of pictures from sites with this term. That&#39;s not what I want, because those sites are often the bad ones with a lot of keywords to lure the searcher. <br />I also don&#39;t understand why this change is considered to be an improvement as it is more difficult to understand and does not work as expected (from the users side).sottayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16062899102526775585noreply@blogger.com