Recordings Reveal FBI Armed a Man and Urged Him to Carry Out a Mass Shooting to “Defend Islam”

It’s become a near-weekly occurrence. Somewhere in some state, the FBI will announce that they’ve foiled yet another terrorist plot and saved
lives. However, as the data shows, the majority of
these cases involve psychologically diminished patsies who’ve been entirely groomed, armed, and entrapped by FBI agents. Simply put, the FBI
manufactures terror threats and then takes credit for stopping them.

Samy Mohamed Hamzeh was born in the US, but lived in Jordan before moving to Milwaukee at the age of 19. At the age of 25, he was being groomed by the
FBI to commit terrorism, which began after being contacted by “strangers” that wanted to radicalize him and give him weapons. The article claims
that the group was entirely controlled by the FBI and were plotting to shoot up the Humphrey Scottish Rite Masonic Center during a planned event.

In February of 2016, the FBI
announced they had foiled a terror plot by a man who was planning to kill at least 30 people to “defend Islam.” Americans cheered, and
everyone felt safer — the FBI had saved us from extremists once again.

The suspect’s attorneys say there are hundreds of hours of recorded conversations that show the FBI attempting to influence Hamzeh into obtaining
weapons and to carry out a mass shooting.

The claim comes in a new court motion that Samy Mohamed Hamzeh, 25, should be released on bail pending his trial, now set for February.

The motion reveals new details about the defense's claim of entrapment, gleaned from hours of now-translated Arabic conversations the informants
recorded.

The tapes also show that Hamzeh attempted to resist and adamantly refused to participate in any violence. After the FBI announced their “success”
in stopping terrorism, all they could charge their "suspect" with was the possession of a machine gun and silencer, which he purchased from two
corrupt FBI informants that pressured him throughout the ordeal.

As the Journal-Sentinel
reports, a psychiatrist who evaluated Hamzeh in jail concluded he does not fit a profile of someone who would kill strangers and
“has a strong moral code with a very prominent conscience and empathy.”

“There is also no evidence that Hamzeh ever made any plans or was doing anything other than making empty boasts to express his resentment about
Israel or to gain attention,” reads their brief in support of the bond motion.

If Hamzeh is truly innocent, he has been forced to sacrifice the last year and a half of his life, as he remains in jail during his trial.

If that wasn’t enough, former FBI assistant director Thomas Fuentes actually defended the practice of “baiting and abetting,” giving the
American people this shocking statement:

Former FBI assistant director Thomas Fuentes actually reveals the answer as he defends the tactics used by the FBI to set up poverty-stricken men
by offering them large sums of money and weapons to commit crimes.

“If you’re submitting budget proposals for a law enforcement agency, for an intelligence agency, you’re not going to submit the proposal
that ‘We won the war on terror and everything’s great,’ cause the first thing that’s gonna happen is your budget’s gonna be cut in half,”
states Fuentes. “You know, it’s my opposite of Jesse Jackson’s ‘Keep Hope Alive’—it’s ‘Keep Fear Alive.’ Keep it
alive.”

A documentary film, The Newburgh Sting, premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival
in April of last year. The film set out to expose how the FBI entraps and coaxes otherwise peaceful people into participating in hoax crimes.

In the film, former FBI assistant director Thomas Fuentes defends the tactics used by the FBI to set up poverty-stricken men and offering them large
sums of money to commit crimes.

“In the context of an interview about a case in which a paid FBI informant is alleged to have offered destitute men a quarter of a million
dollars to execute an attack, a former assistant director of the FBI admits it’s in the bureau’s best
interest to inflate the supposed terror threat. That’s remarkably candid, and profoundly disturbing.”

In her written ruling upholding the conviction, Judge McMahon noted that Cromitie “had successfully resisted going too far for eight months,”
and agreed only after “the Government dangled what had to be almost irresistible temptation in front of an impoverished man from what I have come
(after literally dozens of cases) to view as the saddest and most dysfunctional community in the Southern District of New York.” It was the FBI’s
own informant, she wrote, who “was the prime mover and instigator of all the criminal activity that occurred.” She then wrote:

As it turns out, the Government did absolutely everything that the defense predicted in its previous motion to dismiss the indictment. The
Government indisputably “manufactured” the crimes of which defendants stand convicted. The Government invented all of the details of the
scheme, such as the trip to Connecticut and the inclusion of Stewart AFB as a target, for specific legal purposes of which the defendants
could not possibly have been aware (the former gave rise to federal jurisdiction and the latter mandated a twenty-five year minimum sentence).

The Government selected the targets. The Government designed and built the phony ordnance that the defendants planted (or planned
to plant) at Government-selected targets. The Government provided every item used in the plot: cameras, cell phones, cars, maps and even a gun. The
Government did all the driving (as none of the defendants had a car or a driver’s license). The Government funded the entire project. And the
Government, through its agent, offered the defendants large sums of money, contingent on their participation in the heinous scheme.

Additionally, before deciding that the defendants (particularly Cromitie, who was in their sights for nine months) presented any real danger, the
Government appears to have done minimal due diligence, relying instead on reports from its Confidential Informant, who passed on information about
Cromitie information that could easily have been verified (or not verified, since much of it was untrue), but that no one thought it necessary to
check before offering a jihadist opportunity to a man who had no contact with any extremist groups and no history of anything other than drug
crimes.

Our own Western governments are the terrorists. They terrorise all four corners of the globe with their wars, corruption, pollution, and greed. They
intentionally make life as difficult and miserable as possible for all but a few.

"THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was
intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh,
N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.

But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4
explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested."

"Schemes to carry out a Presidents Day jihadist attack on a train station in Kansas City. Bomb a Sept. 11 memorial event. Blow up a 1,000-pound bomb
at Fort Riley. Detonate a weapon of mass destruction at a Wichita airport — the failed plans all show imagination.

But how much of it was real?

Often not much, according to a review of several recent terrorism cases investigated by the FBI in Kansas and Missouri. The most sensational plots
invoking the name of the Islamic State or al-Qaida here were largely the invention of FBI agents carrying out elaborate sting operations on
individuals identified through social media as being potentially dangerous."

More Irony out of the deep state. I just wanted to add... Any one of these people the FBI is turning into extremists, could be sharing info fed by the
FBI to other extremists. Essentially giving the enemy ideas just because they want the funds and power of anti-terrorism.

I think this is a catch 22 so to speak. The FBI to prevent terrorists needs agents planyes in the communities. These agents have to seem real. Same
when they infiltrate the mob for example. However entrapment becomes a real possibility at that point because agents themselves will go out if the way
to make a case.

So we need them to get information but they also have the need to make themselves relevant. Not sure there is a solution here that doesn't decrease
security.

But having said that entrapment is wrong. But the argument can be made if they were not radicalized they wouldn't play these games with the agent. So
the intent has to be there all ready.

a reply to: eisegesis
This is every conspiracy theorist's dream come true, the FBI is openly admitting that they fund terrorism because it benefits them, yet ATS's top # is
all partisan drivel, serving to distract from this being waved in our faces.

MKUltra is real, false flags are real, government tyranny is real, psychological warfare is the biggest conspiracy. Some years ago Fox exposed the FBI
for the same sh# and nobody paid attention. It's being waved in our faces now and still barely anyone pays attention.

Openly being said! On top of all the occult sh# that is openly being thrust in our faces. The man's coming out from behind the curtain because nobody
cares to recognise him.

so is putting the keys in a car in the worst part of town so someone will try to ((( steel it ) entrapment ?
Because i see this as no different . If said keys were not in the cars just how many cars would have been stolen ?
PS if keys are just tehre it sure takes a dumb person to be fooled into (( steeling it )

Indeed, and remember also John DeLorean and how the FBI set him up. At least the jury saw through the FBI smoke and mirrors.

I consider everything the FBI says in press releases to be government propaganda meant to enhance bureaucratic shenanigans and crimes.

Yeah but sadly it's not even the FBI. State and local law enforcement are not blameless either. Does it make all law enforcement and federal agencies
evil? No. It all comes down to money and what they have to lose.

Steve Avery was convicted of a crime he didn't commit and was exonerated over a decade later. He than sued and subsequently found himself embroiled in
a murder where he was framed and now once again sits in prison. They used his low IQ nephew against him and now his nephew is also in prison. It was
just ruled the nephew's statement was coerced but he remains in prison pending appeal. All because the police department didn't or couldn't afford the
wrongful imprisonment lawsuit.

The entire story is available on Netflix "Making a Murder". The system is inherently broken and until the Crux of the problem is identified and dealt
with people in power will continue to walk around with absolute impunity.

originally posted by: midnightstar
so is putting the keys in a car in the worst part of town so someone will try to ((( steel it ) entrapment ?
Because i see this as no different . If said keys were not in the cars just how many cars would have been stolen ?
PS if keys are just tehre it sure takes a dumb person to be fooled into (( steeling it )

What the # are you going on about? You do realize they specifically Target really stupid people with little to no income right?

ETA: this also proves that ATS is no longer a conspiracy board but a board for Trump supporters to bathe in #alternativefacts and the likes.

OP, you should've included Obama in your title.... this thread would be popping right now. Or some dank ass memes. Or talk about how much swagger
America has and how we shouldn't give a flying # about the rest of the world because #swag

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.