Rwandan Hutus fear genocide reprisal if forcefully repatriated

AP, NAKIVALE, Uganda

Leodegard Kagaba lifts his shirt to reveal an ugly scar on his belly left by a bullet that nearly killed him when Tutsi neighbors in Rwanda attacked him after accusing him of participating in the 1994 genocide.

“I have many scars, even in my heart,” he said. “The people who put those scars on me still live freely in Rwanda.”

Nearly two decades after the genocide, Kagaba and many of the other 9,000 Rwandans at the Nakivale refugee camp in Uganda say they are troubled by the looming prospect of forced repatriation back to Rwanda.

Hutu refugees say they fear reprisal attacks by Tutsis in Rwanda. During the genocide, at least 500,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were killed in a campaign of mass murder orchestrated by Hutu extremists.

After the genocide, hundreds of thousands of Hutus — some charged with participating in the genocide, others simply afraid of reprisal killings — fled Rwanda and sought refuge across east and central Africa.

Many ended up in a sprawling settlement in Nakivale and some now regard the place as their home for life. In the settlement, the Rwandans have access to pasture for their cattle and many have set up successful businesses selling groceries or farm animals.

They say that political climate in Rwanda discourages them from leaving Nakivale. At least 92 percent of all Rwandan refugees in Uganda are Hutus, a UN refugee agency said.

Kagaba, an ethnic Hutu whose father and siblings were killed in 1994, said he would be harassed or worse in Rwanda because he saw atrocities committed by Tutsi soldiers who came to his village looking for genocide suspects.

Rwandan President Paul Kagame — an ethnic Tutsi — dismisses allegations that his country targets Hutus, saying those who played a role in the genocide should face the law.

However, groups such as Human Rights Watch — which the Rwandan government openly spars with — have long accused Kigali of using a genocide ideology law to target the regime’s critics. Independent journalists who have written critically about the history of the genocide have been threatened with jail terms. Many have fled.

Rwanda’s government said in a statement on Friday that “Rwandan refugees who hesitate to return home either lack enough information on the current situation in Rwanda or have developed significant ties with host countries.”

The 8,000 Rwandans who arrived in Uganda before 1998 have until the end of June to return home voluntarily. Uganda, which hosts the highest number of officially recognized Rwandan refugees, has published lists of those who are expected to return home soon.

In Nakivale, the Hutus who fled Rwanda at the end of the genocide spoke of a persistent witch hunt, saying sons can be harassed for their father’s crimes. Their grim opinion of life in Rwanda is reinforced by the accounts of refugees who returned to Rwanda and fled back to Uganda, saying they had been jailed on trumped-up charges and even tortured.

Some of the refugees freshly arriving from Rwanda claim persecution and want political asylum, said Lucy Beck, a spokeswoman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights’ (UNHCR) office in Uganda.

Belonging to a family seen in the community as having participated in the genocide carries a lifetime stigma, some refugees said, equating a Hutu’s return to Rwanda to committing suicide. Some Tutsi families are still eager to exact revenge on neighbors they believe killed their relatives, said Rajab Simpamanuka, a Hutu refugee who has lived in Nakivale since 2001.