Get the point?

Fyreladdie
Oct. 2, 2001, 3 a.m. (Message 27641)

In a message dated 10/1/01 2:32:37 PM, xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx writes:
<< It's a bit of a conundrum, actually - it's the technique that makes
SCD Scottish; but it's the technique that makes it hard. Without
the technique, it's not SCD, but with too much emphasis on
technique, no one does SCD...
Thoughts? Counter-points? >>
As a teacher I look at SCD as a whole being. There are those who can
point, turn out and dance with beautiful steps and grace. There are others
that find it hard to walk. My philosphy is one of inclusion. You take what
you get and make the best of it. I don't think it waters down SCD to have
those who struggle participate. But I also don't wish anyone to feel badly
about their diminished ability. SCD will survive with the few that may reach
that perfection and the few that don't, but the social interaction is as
important the technique. I look at the smiling faces as much as the feet.
Bob Mc Murtry
Felton, CA

YEAH!!!! And, actually, a great skill for any dancer is to dance with those
who present challenges in such a way that a challenging person is not
uncomfortable or dangerous. It's kind of like driving a vehicle
successfully. Defensive dancing?