Choose
the car you like, the woman you marry, or the supermarket you shop at,
and you “discriminate.” We all discriminate every minute of our lives—to
discriminate means to choose between endless options that suit your needs,
values, or preferences. Personal discrimination means having the right
to choose what you do with your body, values, and the money or property
you own.

When
we “discriminate” with our property, we exercise our right to make choices.
But sometimes we make bad choices that offend others. Some people don’t
wish to sell to, buy from, or associate with minorities, Catholics, old
people, homosexuals, or women with children. People can be irrational
or bigoted in a thousand ways.

However,
respect for each other’s freedom ironically requires that we respect each
other’s right to make decisions that may offend some people. For example,
if a homeowner doesn’t want to rent his upstairs apartment to bald men,
homosexuals, or Indonesian women, that should be his right, because it
is his home.

The
homeowner may be “prejudiced” against certain people, but he has the right
to make that choice with his own property. The person denied the apartment,
while their feelings may be offended, had no claim to that apartment,
for it was not their property in the first place. In free trade
between people who respect each other’s property and freedom of choice,
you have the right to buy or sell anything, but only if the other
person is willing to trade with you. Every trade requires the free consent
of both parties.

Remember,
an insulted would-be tenant also has free choice. He can decide who he
rents from. Doesn’t a tenant also “discriminate” against a homeowner if
he chooses not to rent the apartment because it is dirty, in a neighborhood
too far from where he works, or because he doesn’t like the owner’s
race or personality?

The
same applies to all privately-owned property in a free country. The owner
of a restaurant has the right to not serve someone who can’t order in
English. It’s his restaurant. A private-school owner has the right to
say, “I will only admit Asian students with wealthy parents.” It’s his
school. These businessmen may be fools to believe bad things about whole
groups of people, but they have the right to be fools with their own property.

A school
or business owner earned the money and took the risks to buy that school
or business. However, if he irrationally excludes too many people as customers,
he may soon find himself out of business and bankrupt. The free market
often punishes a business owner for being stupid or bigoted. We all dislike
bigots, but one man’s bigotry is another’s truth. No one has the right
to dictate our opinions or moral values, or to control our property without
our consent. That’s
what property rights means.

Yet,
anti-discrimination laws violate this principle. These laws say a man
can’t choose who he wants to do business with. This means that government
now presumes to control that man’s mind, hard-earned property, personal
decisions, and freedom of choice. It means tyranny.

If government
officials can tell us what opinions we can or can’t have about other people,
it can also tell us what we can or can’t do with our bodies, property,
and even our children. It can wipe out our freedom of choice. Isn’t that
what compulsory public schools do against parents? Isn’t that what a suffocating
web of government regulations does to all businessmen? Haven’t the bureaucrats,
like a spreading cancer, eaten away ever more of our choices, our freedom,
and our property rights?

Also,
in the end, anti-discrimination laws end up hurting the very people they
want to help. The more that government strangles businesses with a suffocating
web of anti-discrimination, wage, health, and environmental regulations,
the worse off minorities get. A massive Federal government needs massive
deficit spending. That pumps up inflation. Inflation sharply raises the
cost of living for everyone, which hurts low-income minorities most of
all.

Strangling
government regulations also cripple small businesses and either stop them
from opening, or restrict their expansion. That means less jobs for minority
workers. Also, every time Congress raises the minimum wage, small-business
owners who can’t afford these raises have to fire some of their minority
workers.

It is
only governments, at any level, that have no right to discriminate.
Government’s purpose is to protect all citizens’ liberty. Also, government
bureaucrats do not earn or create property. They mostly loot money (through
taxes) from some people to give to others. They therefore don’t have the
right, for example, to tell all restaurant owners in white neighborhoods
that they can’t serve Blacks (as some states did with Jim Crow laws).
That violates the right of a non-bigoted restaurant owner to serve whoever
he pleases. Such laws also violate the political and economic liberty
of a black person.

One
reason discrimination against Blacks lasted so long in many southern states
was because Jim Crow laws legalized segregation, but these laws were created
by local governments. Such laws forbid competition between bigots and
non-bigots. The restaurant or bus company who serves all people makes
more money and has a greater chance at success. Bigoted businessmen lose
money. In the end, without government-enforced discrimination laws, the
free market would wipe out most organized discrimination.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

In short,
we, as individuals or businesses, have the right to “discriminate” with
our own minds, bodies, and property. I say this not because I agree with
bigots, but to protect our most fundamental liberties, the liberties that,
in the end, are the only real protection for those “discriminated” against.

Mr. Turtel has
written two books, published over fifty articles, and has been interviewed
in both print and broadcast media on the subject. His latest book, Public
Schools, Public Menace has garnered national media attention – recently,
for example, Dr. Laura Schlessinger featured the book on her nationally
syndicated radio show.

Joel Turtel is
available to discuss his book Public Schools, Public Menace in the media,
at conferences, or with individual groups. Be warned though, you may be
shocked by the revelations he has uncovered in America's public-school
system.