Hi-Rez says: We are huge Tribes fans, and we certainly feel honored to own the Tribes Franchise, and are deeply aware of the expectations that carries

If they were huge fans of Tribes as they say they are, then why are they gonna introduce huge pvp 100+ player action. I just think it will be just a deathmatch shooter, in other words it will fall on its ass within the 1st 6months or less.

16v16 is adequate enough if not 12v12, but 50v50 will be just OTT in either offence or defence, ending in just a mess. I cant see ctf with 50v50 being any fun what so ever..

One of my all time fav memories was steppin out onto the edge of scarabrae for the 1st time and looking out over the edge. Troop carriers flying past me takin troops upto the enemy base, simpley amazing feeling of depth of gameplay with a floating base to top it off and flying over the hill towards the enemy base was breathe taking seeing it floatin in the air was nothing short of superb!!!

Someone puts that in a game and its making millions, although placing 100+ players also would be a huge mess. You can tell this game means alot and the community still shouts out what it wants and it isnt a stupid frigging mmo crap with 100+ players just spamming away...

who in their right mind is gonna buy this console port to pc bullshit game, honestly its about time that Lucas Arts got someone to make a proper decent FPS Starwars game for the pc! Surely they must be tired of not making any money wot so ever..

I completely agree with you Beaner...why cant they just release a game to buy instead of an mmo game which wont last at all. 100+ players in the tribes realm will be boring if not laggy as fuck! Global Agenda is boring as hell and if they think they can just say oh lets make a game similar and put Tribes name infront of it they will want to play it.. NOT!

I played Tribes 1 to the death, cos i cant get windows 7 to work with it.. If they can see what the community wants, it would make good business sense to fill the boots of what "we" all want. Then why try to get us to pay monthly, surely that is a contradiction in its self. I see certain death, cos i wont be buyin it at all and I would see a good 99% of the old community doing just the same, they would rip it to bits like Tribes 2, flat, slow and boring.

ohno, Hi-Rez.. Oh please they are shit. Ive got very low expectations for this now as all you have to read is the 100+ player games, talk about boring. It sounds like wow already, I rather not want to think about it. I bought Tribes 1 back in 1998/99 and it was the best thing since sliced bread, now i feel its gonna get a wow touch which bores the crap out of me already..

SpectralMeat wrote on Oct 20, 2010, 08:01:That seems a little steep for minimum req. for a game that uses 3 years old graphics engine.

Yeah but it has been tweaked alittle too and that engine has had a billion in sales so it must be a good engine, that and skint-flint Activision wont dream of making a new engine when they can screw ppl over and over with the old one...

Oh yeah they have feelings, they are most probably in pub sobbing their hearts out gettin pissed on the money from BioShock2 thinking oh wow all them poor gamers who bought it and cant play it awww..

They dont give a shit, they have your money so why should they give a shit, ive looked on the BioShock forum and they dont give a toss, 8 months to see all the pain that is going on and yet still they say sorry were not bothering, basically saying "who gives a shit we've got your money."

Thankfully i didnt buy it and never will buy any game from 2K Games and especially Duck Nuckem NeverEver. After release DKN would be full of bugs like all their other games and they wouldnt release any patches to fix it as they would just make excuses like they are now.

SO FUCK EM!!! Tell everyone all your friends what a pile of shit they are and just make sure noone ever buys anything from them..

Have a lovely day, I havent bought the game so why am i bothering to say owt, its cos yet again pc gamers get screwed over!!!