The ZetaTalk NewsletterIssue 262, Sunday October 9, 2011Weekly news and views from around the world and beyond.

New ZetaTalk

Earth Changes

Announcements

Signs of the Times

Africa Trembles

The African roll, one of the 7 of 10 scenarios, involves the African Plate scraping along the Mediterranean while loosening
and dropping down toward Antarctica. Where this is not expected to generate great quakes, it would certain tear open the
African Rift region. The African rolls would also likely cause trauma along the scraping borders, at least at the start. As noted
in a Pole Shift ning blog, two recent indications - the Nabro volcano eruption and quake swarms in the Canary Islands -
show the Africa Plate is on the move. The Nabro volcano in the Afar Triangle of Africa has not erupted in the memory of
man!

Nabro is an Eritrean volcano with no historic eruption record. Satellite imagery suggests that the eruption of
Nabro Volcano, which began in June 2011, continues. The volcano is located on the edge of the Danakil
Desert, a remote and sparsely populated area on the border between Eritrea and Ethiopia.

One of the ning's talented illustrators, Kojima, shows the impact of the African roll along all borders, especially where Africa
scrapes along above Morocco and Algeria. During a discussion of the Canary Islands on the Pole Shift ning the fact that the
Canary Islands are an extension of the Atlas Mountain Range out into the ocean was noted. Thus, the scraping above
Morocco and Algeria could create trembling, quake swarms, there, as deep rock layers are set to vibrating.

ZetaTalkPrediction10/16/2010:The fact that the African Plate, during previous rolls, created mountain building
can be seen on a relief map. Morocco and Algeria have mountains due to the rolling in the past. The border of the
African Plate slices across northern Algeria, and thus when the plate rolls and drops, the Mediterranean floor there
will suddenly find itself unsupported.

Quake swarms in the Canary Islands, as many as 8,000 minor quakes recorded recently, are causing evacuations on some of
the islands.

The Canary Island of El Hierro, the smallest and farthest southeast of the Spanish Atlantic archipelago, is
steeling itself for a possible volcanic eruption after a series of tremors was felt during the weekend.

Troops of the Military Emergency Unit (UME) in the Canary Islands this afternoon departed by boat from
Tenerife to El Hierro to assist in an eventual evacuation of the island to the risk of volcanic eruption and
earthquakes that are becoming more intense.

Per the Zetas, the widening Atlantic Rift, part of the 7 of 10 African roll process, is causing these vibrations and trembling.

ZetaTalkComment10/1/2011:There are no fault lines under the Canary Islands, but they are narrow projectiles
sticking up above the waves, and as such vibrate when the African Plate frees itself along its long border with the
Mediterranean, down through the Red Sea, down through the Indian Ocean and up through the Atlantic. Particular
the pulling apart of the Atlantic, already in process, creates a jitter on the eastern side of Africa. Those on the
Canary Islands feeling nervous about this ought to take the clue, as those who remain on the island will not survive
the pole shift.

Asia Drowning

The sinking on the Sunda Plate has increased. A new UN report specifically focusing on southeast Asia stresses disasters in
the countries the Zetas stated would be experiencing sinking as the Sunda Plate holding Indonesia is pushed down. Pakistan's
sinking was the first stage of the 7 of 10 scenarios, where India tilted causing the Indus Valley to lose 10 feet in elevation, the
Zeta prediction in 2009. Pakistan has not and will not recover this elevation, which is continuously called a "flood" in the
media as the word "sinking" is not allowed. Bangladesh and parts of India are continuously losing elevation as India is being
shoved under the Himalayas, the Indo-Australian Plate tipping up at the New Zealand edge. Due to the accordion folding
sideways of the Sunda Plate, Part of Thailand and Cambodia have been driven down, so that horrific flooding has occurred
in almost every province of Thailand.

The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) today voiced its concern at the
millions of people who have been affected by the floods ravaging many countries in Asia. Pakistan, the
Philippines, India, Bangladesh, Cambodia and Thailand are all suffering from the effects of flood waters, and
many people have lost their lives as a result. In Thailand, more than two million acres of farmland are
underwater and more than 635 schools have been damaged, leaving thousands of children out of school. In
Pakistan, this is the second year in a row that the country has endured severe floods.

Storms or no storms, the level of flooding has reached horrific levels. In the interior of Viet Nam, in an area due to sink 40
feet per the Zeta projections, the flood waters are at roof level. In the Philippines, in Bulacan north of Manila, the sea dykes
are breached, sea water flowing inland where the land is now lower than the sea.

Large areas of Luzon remain flooded with some villages enduring water nearly two storeys high.

In addition to the implications in the UN report, specifying flooding in southeast Asia, admissions that the flooding is not
caused solely by rain are beginning to be made in the press. Both in the Philippines north of Manila and in Jakarta on the
islands of Java there are admissions that include the word "sinking".

Meanwhile, a study made by Bulacan Environment and Natural Resources Office (BENRO) chief Rustico de
Belen showed that many parts of Bulacan, particularly the coastal municipalities of Calumpit and Hagonoy,
are "sinking." He also said that the flooding is an effect of climate change.

Water can not flow into the sea . There are a number of points in the north of Jakarta which sea water
elevation is higher than the mainland. He pointed at the Fish Market, Jakarta. To withstand sea water pump
installed folder plus water to drain from land to sea.

Planet X Viewing

Planet X is seen most readily at sunrise or sunset, when light in the red spectrum curves over the horizon and the glare of
white light is reduced. Red light bends most readily, and the charged dust cloud shrouding Planet X is composed primarily of
red iron oxide particles. A recent post on the Pole Shift ning blog devoted to the analysis of new photos of Planet X had a
recent addition from Rio. Planet X is in a different location in the Rio photos from photo captures in the Northern
Hemisphere, such as those from Norway and South Dakota featured in Issue 213 on November 28, 2010. The Zetas are
frequently asked to pinpoint the spot where Planet X could be sighted, but it is a complicated picture!

ZetaTalkExplanation10/1/2011: Those who have noticed the undeniable signs that a planetary body is in our inner
solar system, between the Earth and Sun and creating an Earth wobble and a highly eccentric Moon orbit, are
understandable anxious to have a personal sighting of this body for themselves. We are often asked for specifics on
the exact spot to focus on, as then a camera with filters can have a target zone. Planet X is slightly to the right of the
Earth if one were out in space, gazing in, as it is coming at the Earth in a retrograde orbit, pushing the Earth back in
her orbit. This has been described as the 4 o'clock position, if one assumes the viewer to be standing with their head
pointed north. But it's not that simple.

The first issue is the angle of the Ecliptic. This is a new concept for most, as other than the general location of the
rising or setting Sun, or the Moon's path across the sky, and the thought that the Earth rotates west to east, it is not
a concern. If one considers that humans on the surface are either standing upright at the N Pole, and upside down at
the S Pole, and laying on their side along the Equator, then obviously the view changes depending upon locale. The 4
o'clock position moves. You must check planetarium software to determine where your Ecliptic is located for your
time and place, and then determine the 4 o'clock position. Remember than for the Southern Hemisphere things will
also be upside down.

The second issue is the Earth wobble, and the dance that Planet X and the Earth are in at present. The Earth wobble
includes a lean as it forms a Figure 8 with its N Pole. This lean also skews your view of the Ecliptic, changing the
angle. Then there is the bobbing about that the Earth is doing as it flips about trying to align with both the Sun and
Planet X, magnetically. Earth leans her N Pole away from the hosing coming from Planet X, then suddenly flips into
opposition leaning its N Pole toward Planet X instead. both Planets are on the move during this dance, increasing
the distance between them or coming close, bobbling up or down above or below the Ecliptic also, so just what the
angle vs a vs the Sun you are seeing might be is a guess, on any given day.

The recent photos of Planet X from Rio show yet another variable that must be considered. Since Planet X is slightly
below the Ecliptic, light from Planet X makes a more direct trip to the Southern Hemisphere than to the Northern
Hemisphere. Light bends along the curve of the Earth, pulled down by gravity, so those in the Northern Hemisphere
are actually seeing Planet X at a distorted location! The degree of distortion increases the further north one lies. This
is likewise true of the Southern Hemisphere, but to a lesser degree. This distortion of light rays is what causes the
Sun to appear huge at sunrise or sunset, when red light rays, most prone to bending, are predominant. Thus most
Second Sun sightings occur at sunrise or sunset, as these bending rays first go out, then bend back to the viewers
eye, making the Second Sun appear large.

Faster than Light

Einstein's E=MC2 equations purported that light speed was the fastest possible, so man has been operating on that
assumption. Like the Flat Earth theory, this has been proven wrong. But it was the Zetas that stood up to mankind's math and
claimed, in no uncertain terms, that it was wrong, despite Einstein. This came up during a debate in 2001 with astronomers
on the sci.astro usenet. The Zetas had given the speed of approach for Planet X during the years leading up to its arrival in
the inner solar system in 2003, and this speed proved to be faster than the speed of light. Not possible, said the astronomers.
Absolutely possible, said the Zetas.

ZetaTalkAssertion2001: There is no limit in space, only that which mankind assumes. During math discussions on
sci.astro, it has been surmised that the speed of Planet X approaches the speed of light during its most rapid
approach, and this astonishes those in the discussion. Why is it assumed that light is the fastest thing in the universe,
re travel? Man thinks this because it is something he can measure. He is aware of such a small percentage of matter
and energy about him that to say that he comprehends 1% of what the universe is composed of would be an
overstatement. Our space travel, in 4th Density and even 3rd Density, is faster than light, and we do not melt. Man
does not understand, so we cannot give him satisfaction in our explanations. Suffice it to say that our explanation is
correct, and Planet X travels rapidly into our midst, thence the Repulsion Force is invoked, thence it floats past
between the Earth and Sun.

Ridiculed at the time, the Zetas have now been proven correct with man's own experiments. CERN particles were observed
moving faster than light.

Scientists in Switzerland say an experiment appears to show that tiny particles traveled faster than the speed
of light - a result that would seem to defy the laws of nature. The physicists say that neutrinos sent 730
kilometers (453.6 miles) underground between laboratories in Switzerland and Italy arrived a fraction of a
second sooner than they should have, according to the speed of light. The report was published Friday by a
group of researchers working on the so-called Opera experiment, based at the European Organization for
Nuclear Research, known as CERN, in Switzerland. CERN is the home of the Large Hadron Collider. The
finding would seem to challenge Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity, and the long-established law of
physics that nothing can exceed the speed of light.

The debates on sci.astro from 1997-2003 even lured in a famous astronomer, Jim Scotti, who tends the Pope Scope at
Tucson, AZ, arguing the old way of thinking with the Zetas. The full sci.astro debates are on the ZetaTalk website and are a
fascinating read showing what the Zetas and I have been up against trying to deliver their message against teams of paid
debunkers, astronomers ordered to deny, and just plain skeptical or highly arrogant humans! In 2001 Planet X was in the
night sky, and the team was tracking it in at the ZetaTalk coordinates. It appeared as a dim star, moving along those
coordinates, visible also with its extensive dust cloud reflecting sunlight.

In Article: <b0jth8$ha5$1@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu> Jim Scotti wrote:
> If your fictitious object orbits the sun every 3600
> years as you've stated, it can't get farther than about
> 470 astronomical units from the sun which means it
> should never get fainter than 20th magnitude if it is as
> you describe it.
You're still mixing in YOUR definitions with OURS,
Jim, without clarifying this. Now why is that, Jim, that this
should be SO important, to mislead the public?
ZetaTalk

And indeed, confusing the issue seemed to be the intent, unless Jim is trying to claim ignorance! The Pope Scope at Tucson is
the scope the Pope uses to peek at the inbound Planet X. Methinks Jim was not as ignorant as he was pretending.

In Message <avatgh$r36$1@oasis.ccit.arizona.edu> Jim Scotti wrote:
> Assuming it is the size and albedo of Saturn (isn't it
> supposed to be a Brown Dwarf, so it should be larger
> and give off some of its own light?), it would have to
> be about 100 times farther away than Saturn - that
> would be something like 1000 times the distance of
> Earth from the Sun!
It is as a body 4 times the diameter of Earth and about half
way in from its dither point between its two foci, some 9
Sun-Pluto distances OUT. We will ask Nancy to give you a few
pages as reference so we can be on the same page here.
ZetaTalk