Well last night I was leaning Brody, but now I'm convinced we should lynch TH. He is either lying with his whole "I have to kill every night" to cover up or he is just going to have to take a shot in the dark most nights and could take out one of us.

OSU did it really take someone making that argument to change your mind? This is what I don't get, the info on TH has been out for a while and all it took was one person being firm about it to start the lynch train. Again, I could get on board, he was number two option for me and I am starting to think we will learn a ton about from his death.

OSU did it really take someone making that argument to change your mind? This is what I don't get, the info on TH has been out for a while and all it took was one person being firm about it to start the lynch train. Again, I could get on board, he was number two option for me and I am starting to think we will learn a ton about from his death.

Much like those that vote early and those who vote late, those who vote in the middle of the pack are very suspicious. Should TH end up being good (if he is lynched), then I'm thinking OSU is one who stands out. I know that this has not been moving at breakneck speed today, so I might have to cut a little slack to those jumping on with the crowd (see: what I will probably do), but it does seem a little odd that he is now "convinced"

Much like those that vote early and those who vote late, those who vote in the middle of the pack are very suspicious. Should TH end up being good (if he is lynched), then I'm thinking OSU is one who stands out. I know that this has not been moving at breakneck speed today, so I might have to cut a little slack to those jumping on with the crowd (see: what I will probably do), but it does seem a little odd that he is now "convinced"

On a serious note, the point about people ass-dragging when Brody was the vote but are now suddenly on board with the TH vote do deserve some suspicion. I know some of us were waiting for trivia, but it's worth keeping in mind nonetheless.

I just don't get how I can never play a game without seeming suspicious. Literally the only game people believed me was the game that I was the innocent child and had BB(who was running the game) confirm it for me, but until he did, they didn't believe me.

Don't like how Rob is telling us that he has a night action and protection, because in my opinion there is nothing that backs his claim. Yeah, Brodeur targeted him, but how do we know he isn't just a townie or hell even a mafia member that Brodeur hit on, if he is indeed a jailkeeper.

Anyway, so there's been a huge turn on the votes and now TH is the majority. I don't disagree with it. Obviously having someone out there who can kill and is known is dangerous. Especially, as a vigilante who is required to kill each night.

I guess I would lean towards voting that way as well. Reducing the deaths each night is vital (obviously). Looking at our options, which seem to be Brodeur and TH. Would you rather hit on a SK or a roleblocker as a best case scenario? Yeah, it would suck losing the vigilante, but without any information, those kills at night are random shots in the dark.

Now, the last thing I was thinking. What if TH is the SK and there is no vigilante. If that were the case, could there be two mafias? I only suggest it because the game is larger than our recent games, and from being in the Wire game that was similar in size, we saw two mafias battle it out. At the same time, there was two SKs, so who knows. Part of me was thinking the Mecca gang as one group and just trolls as another. Maybe I'm over thinking it here.

But with that said, with what others have said and thinking it through. Right now TH seems like the best option. Hate to do, but sorry.

It isn't so much his role, but how his role reads. He has to kill every night or a random townie dies. He has no idea who is good or bad, and with the numbers how they are, he has a greater chance of killing a townie than a Mafia member.

You people do realise, that if he wasnt the vigilante, the real one would probably speak up to give us an easy kill?

If there is a vigilante...

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolidGold

Bortlezzzzzzz

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monomach

Brilliant letting one of Scott Pioli's henchmen have his own team to ruin. One of the premier GM jobs in the NFL and it gets handed to a stupid **** who makes three facepalm moves for every good one. Awesome. Just like handing a new Mercedes to a 16 year old girl who's already been in three wrecks.

i mean if he goes for guys that are really suspicious anyways, that gives us the chance to not waste lynches. He has chances to kill the mafia. It would also give us someone that is good, which is really important to have. Someone that is proven to be good is a huge asset.

The thing is, i agree he can be dangerous to the town. But we can still kill him if we have no concrete ideas tomorrow. Killing him now with Brodeur having a high chance of being evil just doesnt make sense to me.