October 31, 2012

The FSA terrorists are not revolutionaries, they are just morons with guns who hate everybody that's not like them. They are creating anarchy, not revolutionary change. They don't have a political vision, a social program, an economic plan, a leader, nothing. They are intolerant barbarians who burn the holy bible, kill Christian priests, and destroy churches. They are disposable to Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and NATO.

German poet Heinrich Heine said, "Where they burn books, they will ultimately also burn people." After burning bibles and other religious texts, the thieves and criminals in the FSA will start executing Christians, Shiites, Kurds, etc.

There is no way the FSA can defeat the Syrian army on their own. Their only weapon is terrorism. Their ideology is hate. Their leader is, by their own words, "Bin Laden," yes, that Bin Laden, the one who Obama said he killed but didn't because he was already dead when Obama became President.

If it wasn't for anti-Assad propaganda no one would support these guys. These FSA extremists are ten times worse than the current government in Syria. They spell nothing but disaster for the Syrian people and the region as a whole. The fact that Western governments are backing them with political, military, and media support means that Western civilization has reached a very low point in its history.

The U.S. defeated Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, a group that it created to "give the Soviet Union its Vietnam," only to turn around and re-launch Al-Qaeda in Syria with the help of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. It is a funny game.

But these sad souls in the video below actually believe that Bin Laden is a symbol of freedom. They also champion Saddam Hussein as a "Martyr." They are victims of mind control and brainwashing. They believe Bin Laden did 9/11 but they share that belief with many brainwashed people so that's not really strange.

Plus, their hearts are filled with hate. They are calling for the slaughter of innocent people just because of their religious beliefs. They'll lose in Syria because hate is a form of weakness. It is much better to fight with love in your heart.

"Sometimes, to remain silent is to lie, since silence can be interpreted as assent. " - Miguel de Unamuno.

Infowars reported yesterday that an episode in Jesse Ventura's TruTv show 'Conspiracy Theory' that examined the waste and corruption of the TSA has been pulled from the upcoming season.

It is a miracle that the show is allowed on the air. It is proof that America is not a full-blown totalitarian police state. But it doesn't have to be because the obedience of the majority of the American people has been guaranteed with other strategies and tactics.

Institutions like the TSA have contributed to the creation of a slave-like citizenry. Popular culture has made obedience a hip thing and turned rebellion into a mental disorder. Just having a different opinion is considered nutty and "conspiratorial."

But America could become a completely closed society. If current trends continue then little windows into the real world like Ventura's show will be closed shut. Censorship in America has always been a gradual process. It begins with a line in a movie script, then an episode in a television series, and then a book or a website.

The victim of totalitarian propaganda does not know that he is being mentally suffocated and deprived of the facts. He cannot imagine how much resources has been used by the government to keep him in the dark about nearly everything. The tyranny of psy-ops is invisible. And the enemies of intellectual freedom are everywhere.

Most journalists have abandoned their profession. Edward R. Murrow would be lost in America today. He would be treated as an alien, called a conspiracy theorist, and laughed out of the room.

What journalists faced in the 1950s was pretty mild compared to now. Imagine if the communist-hunters of the Cold War era had a secret Kill List and were emboldened by an event like 9/11 that traumatized the nation's psyche.

The anti-terror narrative is more dangerous to liberty because anyone can be a terrorist but not everybody can be a communist. The hijackers of the U.S. government have played loose with the definition of terrorism in order to silence their internal and external critics. Even journalists are now terrorists.

The abuse of language to instill fear in society is a trick that works in every country. But it has succeeded in America only to a limited extent. The alternative media has put into question the mainstream understanding of the roots of terrorism and the 9/11 events in particular.

As Alex Jones said yesterday on the radio, it is an achievement that the alternative media has become so big. But we should never get complacent. Each of us must make use of whatever is left of press freedom in the West.

October 28, 2012

The upcoming film "Zero Dark Thirty" perfectly sums up the Pentagon/CIA-Hollywood relationship. The brilliant writers at the CIA and Pentagon come up with an outline of a fake script, in this case it is the official story of the assassination of Bin Laden, and then they pitch it to an impressionable and ambitious Hollywood director to turn it into an entertaining movie and indoctrinate the American people.

Since Hollywood propaganda is international, we are all under its sway. The American empire and Israel have been very fortunate that artists and film directors make such great movies that turn U.S.-Israeli government myths into historical truths.

It isn't surprising that the most conscious people in the world work in Hollywood. The new 9/11 truth film called, "September Morn," will be the first of many political films that tackle the 9/11 scandal and its aftermath. Once the culture evolves and the political conditions change, filmmakers will be liberated to examine this tragedy in a new and political way. There is so much drama surrounding the 9/11 events that it will serve as a source for story-telling for decades to come.

It is interesting that the most enlightened, brave, wise, and passionate voices in the Muslim world are women. Male priests, politicians, Gulf oil oligarchs, self-interested Western powers, and extremist hotheads in search of political power and a warped sense of revolutionary glory are screwing it up for everybody.

"It doesn't require any conspiracy theorizing to see what's happening
here. Indeed, it takes extreme naiveté, or wilful blindness, not to see
it.

What has been created here - permanently institutionalized -
is a highly secretive executive branch agency that simultaneously
engages in two functions: (1) it collects and analyzes massive amounts
of surveillance data about all Americans without any judicial review let
alone search warrants, and (2) creates and implements a "matrix" that
determines the "disposition" of suspects, up to and including execution,
without a whiff of due process or oversight. It is simultaneously a
surveillance state and a secretive, unaccountable judicial body that
analyzes who you are and then decrees what should be done with you, how
you should be "disposed" of, beyond the reach of any minimal
accountability or transparency." - Glenn Greenwald, "Obama moves to make the War on Terror permanent," October 24, 2012.

The post-9/11 White House is a tyranny that is every bit as monstrous and cruel as the Catholic Church of the Middle Ages, the Soviet Union, and other totalitarian-religious systems that have taken power by force and fraud.

Executions and state terrorism are the hallmarks of tyrannies that are based on grand falsehoods and ridiculous dogmas. In America, anyone who does not conform to the state's version of history and accept its falsehoods as truths is branded as a terrorist and a conspiracy theorist.

Self-sufficient, politically awakened, and independent-minded citizens are considered the greatest political enemies of the unaccountable President and the scandal-ridden CIA, as opposed to shadowy Jihadist boogeymen in the Middle East, the majority of whom are armed and financed directly by the CIA.

According to a National Guard whisteblower, people who prepare for future emergencies and take the responsible steps to protect their families will be hunted down like terrorists by the federal government.

You would think a responsible and sensible federal government would draw on the support of responsible citizens to restore social order in a time of national crisis but that's not the case. Since the federal government has a radical political agenda that it wants to impose on America it is not interested in any help from independent-minded citizens. It wants conformity and obedience in a period of chaos, not patriotic assistance.

Political systems that have as their foundation an absolute power over reality are cruel, merciless, and uncompromising with dissidents and heretics. Those who will not go along with the reality defined by the White House and the radical political agenda of the federal government will be treated as internal enemies and eliminated. If towns and states resist, they will be sieged. America will experience a reign of terror. The Oklahoma bombing and false flag 9/11 events were only the beginning.

America can learn from the experience of other countries and avoid the tragedies ahead. Violent suppression of dissidents and critics happened in Iran in the aftermath of the Islamic revolution. Anybody who resisted the will of Khomeini and the power of the Islamic Republic was tortured and executed. In most cases, the CIA offered the names of dissidents to Khomeini in order to help him identify his enemies and consolidate his power over Iran.

It is pretty ironic that U.S. officials criticize the Ayatollahs of Iran for ruling with an iron fist when they have slowly and secretly established a dictatorship of their own in the United States. The totalitarian-religious state in Washington doesn't have an iconic figurehead like Khomeini, or an official state religion, but there are other elements that define its religiousness.

Some of these elements are; 1) the mind-changing effects of the false flag September 11 events on the American people, 2) the construction of the totalitarian ideology that is counter-terrorism, 3) the daily indoctrination of the American people through the mass media, 4) the public religiously and blindly invests its trust in the President, aka the "decision-maker," and, 5) the state's suppression of dissent, debate, and dialogue among the citizenry, the press, academia, and civil society.

When Russia experienced its totalitarian revolution in 1917 it changed its name, and so did Iran in 1979. In both countries there was a clear line drawn between the pre-revolution period and post-revolution period, marking the transformative political and cultural changes. But no such
line has been drawn in America, which has also undergone a transformative and
historic political revolution. This revolution has resulted in the complete destruction of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The clever
technocrats, media owners, and political leaders in the United States
shoved the political ramifications of the CIA's assassination of President John F.
Kennedy under the rug and dismissed critics of their absurd
official story as mentally ill conspiracy theorists. They did the same
thing following the epoch-making events of 9/11, knowing that official
denials and blanket dismissals of legitimate questions of their version
of history would work, as they did in the past.

But they have been proven wrong in their assessment of the intelligence and bravery of the American people. History was changing under their feet. American culture changed dramatically between the death of JFK and the 9/11 events. A growing segment of the citizenry was becoming skeptical of government propaganda and the proof is that millions of individuals have rejected the fairy tale of 9/11.

The majority of the American people do not believe the official account of 9/11 because it is utterly unconvincing. The counter-terrorism ideology is dead because its foundational story, the 9/11 myth, has been proven to be a big lie. As a result, public faith in the two-party political system and the U.S. government as a whole is at an all time low.

The current path the hijacked U.S. government is taking is not economically sustainable and politically popular. It is a big problem that the mainstream political currents in America are flowing against American public opinion and world public opinion. The biggest political reform movements of this young century, Occupy Wall Street on the left and the libertarians on the right, are not represented in the media or Congress.

This undemocratic state of affairs can't last much longer. The propaganda against the American people has failed. Members of the ruling political elite have lost their minds. They are pushing things to the limit. The point will come when the Drone God in the White House will be dropped back down to earth.

October 26, 2012

The fact that Neocons like to politicize the death of Americans is nothing new. Remember 9/11.

The attack on the American ambassador in Benghazi on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11 has also been politicized by the Neocons.

Neocon con artist William Kristol attacks President Obama in this ridiculous article, asking at the end, "did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?"

Is he implying that Obama is responsible for the deaths of Americans? Yes he is. Kristol is exploiting a tragedy, a human error, or worse (a false flag attack by the shadow CIA and the shadow Mossad), to bring down Obama. This is sickening and shameful stuff.

Why is the media not telling Kristol and the neocons to stand down on this Libyan issue? This is over the line rhetoric. You can't be implying that Obama's inaction resulted in the death of the American ambassador. If there is any blame, it is institutional, not personal.

I'm not defending Obama, but let's not pretend that he actually makes public policy and gives orders. Obama wasn't responsible for the death of Bin Laden and he wasn't responsible for the death of the American ambassador in Libya.

The owner of CNN, the network that vomits out nothing but war propaganda, says war is bad and a reflection of unenlightened barbarism. This hypocrite should tell that to his own news anchors and reporters who believe a USrael war against Iran is a good idea, and that the NATO wars in Libya and Syria will bring freedom.

Remember: CNN was behind 9/11 propaganda, Afghanistan war propaganda, Iraq war propaganda, Libya war propaganda, and Syria war propaganda. It is now pushing for an American-Israeli attack on Iran. All CNN does is war propaganda. But its founder and owner says the world should embrace peace. He can help by starting at CNN first. Make CNN embrace peace. Make CNN lay off the war propaganda.

October 25, 2012

You can thank Obama, aka the Bullshiter in Chief, and the "humanitarian" interventionists in the West and the Arab Gulf dictatorships for this tragedy. They're worse than Gaddafi was. They are the real terrorists and real dictators.

"It seems to me that it’s pretty hard to imagine us going into Iraq
without the strong lobbying efforts from AIPAC [American Israeli Public
Affairs Committee] and the neocons, who think they know what’s good for
Israel more than Israel knows. The invisible elephant in the room on
this issue is the Israeli factor. People don’t like to talk about it." - General Odom, from the article, "General Condemnation," by
George Kenney, In These Times, March 8, 2006.

The only way there can be peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians, and Muslims in general, is a fundamental change in the American-Israeli relationship. America's psychological attachment to Israel must be broken. The current relationship is irrational and the source of many evils.

In this article, I laid out 45 reasons why America should cut off ties with Israel, AIPAC, and the Neocons.

Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein says that both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney have a "slave-like mentality toward Israel." Their basic attitude is that America should be sacrificed for Israel's sake. "Both candidates represent the interests of Israel, not the interests of the US," writes Paul Craig Roberts.

The leaders of Israel will not change course and become more peace-minded because the majority of their people are spiritually committed to a perpetual war against Arabs and Muslims. According to a new Israeli poll, half of Israel wants Palestinians to be evicted. Gideon Levy wrote about the results of the poll in an article called, "Meet the Israelis." An excerpt:

Until a courageous leadership arises here, the kind that appears only
rarely in history, and tries to change this nationalist, racist mood,
there's no point in hoping for change to come from below. It won't come;
indeed, it can't come, because it is contrary to the desires of most
Israelis. This fact must be recognized.

Miko Peled, a heroic Israeli leader and son of a famous Israeli general, has the courage, charisma, and prestige to change Israeli public opinionand transform American attitudes about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He can't do it by himself, but it is leaders like him that will succeed at making Israelis and Americans rethink their shared, twisted past and their counter-productive face-off with Palestinians and the Muslim world.

October 24, 2012

What is political Islam? It is a prison for the soul and mind, financed and publicized by the CIA, MI6, and other Western intelligence agencies.

What is Zionism? It is a totalitarian, terroristic, and racist political movement that will be responsible for a holocaustof Palestinians and Muslims in this century.

What is freedom of speech? It is the greatest thing in society, and it is under attack by totalitarian leaders in both the Western world and the Islamic world. Last month, Muslim leaders and Western-owned Arab kings converged at the United Nations and attacked freedom of speech. Qatar is even calling for an international law against blasphemy.

Blasphemy is another word for dissent. Individuals who reject religious dogma are deemed to be blasphemous by tyrants like the Emir of Qatar and the Ayatollahs of Iran. A different kind of tyranny exists in the West, where the word blasphemy is replaced with "conspiracy theory."

Remember that former president Bush told the world to "never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories," about 9/11 in a speech given at the United Nations on November 10, 2001. President Barack Obama repeated Bush's anti-free speech statements in a speech in Cairo, Egypt on June 4, 2009.

"Free speech is dying in the Western world. While most people still enjoy
considerable freedom of expression, this right, once a near-absolute,
has become less defined and less dependable for those espousing
controversial social, political or religious views. The decline of free
speech has come not from any single blow but rather from thousands of
paper cuts of well-intentioned exceptions designed to maintain social
harmony."

The fact that Western, Jewish, and Muslim leaders could come together and use international law to shut down free speech and destroy the Internet is a terrifying prospect. They are enemies of critical thought, individual liberties, and free societies.

None of the world's major political, legal, educational, spiritual, and international bodies have any principles and values. America, Zionism, and Islam are all oppressive. Israel is in its own territory of tyranny, it has taken that part of the world back to 1 B.C. When they attack free speech and silence dissent, the special phrase they use is not "blasphemy," but "anti-Semitism."

Who the hell in their right mind respects the rulers of Islam, America, and Israel? No freedom-minded individual likes and admires these tyrannies.

One side in this war claims that it is dedicated to the liberation of Palestine and the other side claims that it is dedicated to the liberation of Syria, Iran, and other anti-imperialist dictatorships in the Middle East.

But the West won't bring freedom to Syria and Iran, and Islam won't bring freedom to Palestine. It doesn't matter if Islam succeeds in liberating Palestinians from
Zionist rule because they'll just put spiritual and social chains on them, as Hamas, which is "a creation of Mossad," has already done.

To rational minds, Western, Jewish, and Muslim leaders all sound nuts and out of this world. America overthrew Iran's young democracy in 1953 so the last thing America wants to see in Iran is freedom and democracy. Ahmadinejad rightly expressed skepticism about the suspicious September 11 events on the floor of the United Nations but he also sincerely believes in the crazy prophecy of a "12th" Imam.

It is safe to say that none of our so-called leaders are rational. They all hate freedom of speech and believe the people's will doesn't matter. Power is everything to them.

Those of us who are pro-9/11 truth and are against political Islam are in a tough place, both ideologically and spiritually. Which side in this great war is worth defending? Which side deserves the condemnation of free thinking humanitarians?

Answer: None.

We must defend our core values and principles. Telling big lies to start wars like the 9/11 lie must be condemned. Killing innocent people in false flag terrorist events must be condemned. Using religion to control and enslave people must be condemned. Attacking free speech must be condemned. Racist speech must be condemned.

Defending principles is not hard to do for individuals and institutions that belong to a growing global civil society. We can't make the same excuses that those in power resort to in times of confusion and crisis. We can afford to defend principles.

Lucius Annaeus Seneca (often known simply as Seneca; ca. 4 BC – AD 65) was a Roman Stoic philosopher, statesman, dramatist, and in one work humorist, of the Silver Age of Latin literature. He was tutor and later advisor to emperor Nero. While he was later forced to commit suicide for alleged complicity in the Pisonian conspiracy to assassinate Nero, the last of the Julio-Claudian emperors, he may have been innocent. His father was Seneca the Elder and his elder brother was Gallio.

Remember 9/11. Repeat 9/11 Truth.That false flag activated all of this craziness. USrael does not want stability in the Middle East. It wants pure, total chaos. It wants global hegemony and mass death.

"Alliances are topsy-turvy, defy logic, are unfamiliar and shifting.
Theocratic regimes back secularists; tyrannies promote democracy; the US
forms partnerships with Islamists; Islamists support Western military
intervention. Arab nationalists side with regimes they have long
combated; liberals side with Islamists with whom they then come to
blows. Saudi Arabia backs secularists against the Muslim Brothers and
Salafis against secularists. The US is allied with Iraq, which is allied
with Iran, which supports the Syrian regime, which the US hopes to help
topple. The US is also allied with Qatar, which subsidizes Hamas, and
with Saudi Arabia, which funds the Salafis who inspire jihadists who
kill Americans wherever they can."

October 23, 2012

Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and their brainwashed, dumbed-down followers live in a fantasy-based universe where independent thought and the free expression of opinion are forbidden. It is a universe filled with hate, ignorance, collective insanity, and totalitarian propaganda. And apparently they still have horses and bayonets in this crazy universe. This makes sense because it is socially, culturally, intellectually, technologically, and politically sterile and backwards.

In the Obamney universe, smoking marijuana is a legal offense, the
Federal Reserve and big banks are responsible stewards of taxpayer
dollars, Iran is the biggest threat to humanity in this century, the
Bill of Rights is a thing of the past, drone murders of innocent
civilians is justified, secret assassinations of dissidents and critics
on the order of the President is good, and Israel is the lord and master
of the United States of America.

What is most shocking is that learning is viewed as "conspiracy theorizing" in this strange universe. False flag terrorism is unheard of and truth is a foreign concept. They still live under the delusion that the September 11 events were committed by Al-Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden.

When shown evidence that proves 9/11 was an inside job, the cult-like members of the Obamney universe react with blind rage and accuse the messenger of being a "conspiracy theorist." They also consider connecting the dots as a sign of mental illness, thereby denigrating the professions of the detective, police officer, lawyer, and journalist, who all connect dots to solve crimes and cases.

It is very tragic that science, facts, and reason are not taken seriously in the Obamney universe. Thankfully, though, there is a parallel political universe in the United States, one that is more sane, real, honest, free, and peaceful.

The public representatives of this new and more hopeful universe are Jill Stein, presidential candidate for the Green Party, Rocky Anderson, presidential candidate for the Justice Party, Virgil Goode, presidential candidate for the Constitution Party, and Gary Johnson, presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party.

What all these alternative voices have in common is a love for country, a dedication to public service, and a deep respect for the values, principles, and rights of the American people. They represent the rebirth of American leadership.

As public confidence and faith in the Obamney universe collapses, the real universe will rise to a level of credibility and legitimacy that will be undeniable. The real universe will shake the major institutions of the United States to its rotten foundations: political, media, financial, military, and educational.

II. Third Party Presidential Candidates Offer The Reality of A Second Universe

On Tuesday, October 23, all four alternative presidential candidates attended a historic third party presidential debate hosted by Free and Equal Elections Foundation and moderated by Larry King.

The candidates didn't just offer solutions to America's problems, but something more important and fundamental: the reality of a second universe. Their presence on the stage represents real hope, which doesn't exist in the Obamney universe.

90 million Americans reject the false premises, contradictions, lies, and totalitarian myths of the Obamney universe. They want to live in a universe that has better ideas, solutions, laws, and leaders. And they will because history is on their side.

It doesn't matter if Obama or Romney wins in November because both of them have already lost the confidence, respect, and trust of the awakening American people. Neither man is presidential material. As things stand, the throne is empty. A ghost occupies the president's chair.

But that will change because the Obamney universe is history, and a new universe is coming into political being in America. The third party debate on Tuesday night was just the beginning.

According to a popular story, on one occasion Diogenes had an
interview with Alexander III, King of Macedonia. The king opened the
conversation with "I am Alexander the Great", and the philosopher
answered, "And I am Diogenes the Cynic".

Alexander then
asked him in what way he could serve him. "You can stand out of the
sunshine," the philosopher replied. Alexander is said to have been so
struck with the Cynic's self-possession that he went away remarking, "If I
were not Alexander, I would wish to be Diogenes."

Diogenes died at Corinth, according to tradition, on the same day as Alexander.

Diogenes of Sinope was a Greek philosopher and one of the founders of Cynic philosophy. Also known as Diogenes the Cynic (Ancient Greek: Διογένης ὁ Κυνικός, Diogenēs ho Kunikos), he was born in Sinope (modern-day Sinop, Turkey), an Ionian colony on the Black Sea, in 412 or 404 BC and died at Corinth in 323 BC.

Diogenes of Sinope was a controversial figure. His father minted coins for a living and when Diogenes took to "defacement of the currency", he was banished from the city. After being exiled, he moved to Athens to debunk cultural conventions. Diogenes modelled himself on the example of Hercules. He believed that virtue was better revealed in action than in theory. He used his simple lifestyle and behaviour to criticise the social values and institutions of what he saw as a corrupt society. He declared himself a cosmopolitan. There are many tales about him dogging Antisthenes' footsteps and becoming his faithful hound, but it is by no means certain that the two men ever met. Diogenes made a virtue of poverty. He begged for a living and slept in a jar in the marketplace. He became notorious for his philosophical stunts such as carrying a lamp in the daytime, claiming to be looking for an honest man. He embarrassed Plato, disputed his interpretation of Socrates and sabotaged his lectures. Diogenes was also responsible for publicly mocking Alexander the Great.

After being captured by pirates and sold into slavery, Diogenes eventually settled in Corinth. There he passed his philosophy of Cynicism to Crates, who taught it to Zeno of Citium, who fashioned it into the school of Stoicism, one of the most enduring schools of Greek philosophy. None of Diogenes’ many writings has survived, but details of his life come in the form of anecdotes (chreia), especially from Diogenes Laërtius, in his book Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers. All we have is a number of anecdotes concerning his life and sayings attributed to him in a number of scattered classical sources, none of them definitive.

These terrorists target civilians and commit robberies. "Freedom" is not in their vocabulary. They are running around in the Saudi-Qatari-Israeli-Turkish-NATO maze and destroying Syria for these corrupt governments.

Kill innocent people = a sign of toughness and masculinity.
Defend innocent people = a sign of weakness.

Support the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Magna Carta, and International Law = sympathizing with terrorists.
Destroy the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Magna Carta, and International Law = being tough on terrorists.

Obama and Romney are salesmen of a lost empire, upholders of bankrupt myths, zombies of an American apocalypse, and faces of a dying civilization.

"That era of American dominance is drawing to a close as the
country's relative power declines, along with its ability to manage global
economics and security.

This does not mean the United States will go the way of
Great Britain during the first half of the twentieth century. As Harvard's
Stephen Walt wrote in this magazine last year, it is more accurate to say the
"American Era" is nearing its end. For now, and for some time to come, the
United States will remain primus inter pares--the strongest of the major world powers--though
it is uncertain whether it can maintain that position over the next twenty
years. Regardless, America's power and influence over the international
political system will diminish markedly from what it was at the apogee of Pax Americana. That was the Old Order,
forged through the momentous events of World War I, the Great Depression and
World War II. Now that Old Order of nearly seven decades' duration is fading
from the scene. It is natural that U.S. leaders would want to deny it--or feel
they must finesse it when talking to the American people. But the real
questions for America and its leaders are: What will replace the Old Order? How
can Washington protect its interests in the new global era? And how much
international disruption will attend the transition from the old to the new?" - Christopher Layne, "The End of Pax Americana: How Western Decline Became Inevitable," The Atlantic, April 26, 2012.

The last debate between President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney was not a debate about the most pressing questions of the hour but a parade of American power. It was a charade of a debate. There is a greater range of opinion at a rally of a totalitarian political party, whether current or historical.

There was also no passion in their words. The spirits of Lincoln and Douglas are saying, "Where is the fire in your bellies? Where is the drama of a debate? Where is the great display of American common sense and wisdom?"

Both candidates reaffirmed the core myths and fallacies that have guided U.S. decision making and served as the ideological bedrock of U.S. foreign policy in the post-9/11 world. Here is a list of the key statements that were made in the debate in one form or another by both candidates: "America is the indispensable nation," "Israel is a true friend and our best ally" "Iran is the greatest national security threat," "We must support democracy in Syria and the Middle East," "Iran must not get a nuclear bomb."

Why are Obama and Romney so obsessed about creating democracy in Syria and preventing the emergence of nuclear weapons in Iran, but overlook the lack of democracy and the existence of nuclear weapons in Israel?

Why do Obama and Romney worship Israel and treat it as a nation that is above criticism, above America, and above the world? Why does a great nation like America bend its knee to Israel and submit to its will? The reason can't be to simply defend Israel in a volatile region because Israel has the means to defend itself.

And if volatility is the big worry, then why not change the current U.S. and Israeli policies that create volatility and hatred? U.S. and Israel reign through chaos and terror. This is the global reality. The world demands defense from USrael.

Israel is not a victim, so it is insane for American leaders to treat it like a victim and defend the indefensible in the process. Since its birth, Israel has chosen to endlessly wage war and commit aggression against its neighbours. It will pay the price for its criminal disregard of human rights and international law. Ruling by fear doesn't work forever.

One of the main themes of the debate was Iran. Both candidates threatened Iran with war, but they would've served America and the world better if they
laid out the consequences of a war between USrael and Iran. They did not
discuss the limits of U.S. military power in a possible war with Iran. Is this how responsible leaders act? How serious are they about their threats?

And why are both of them so anti-Iranian? We know it's not
about the nuclear issue because Iran is not interested in acquiring nuclear weapons. Is the issue about regime change? Do they want to wipe the Islamic Republic and Islam off the consciousness of humanity? Do they want war with Iran even if it involves nuclear weapons? Are they sure America will
emerge victorious in an apocalyptic clash with Iran and the world of
Islam? And what will it take to achieve a favourable outcome for USrael in this stupid war: for example, the use of nuclear bombs on Iranian cities?

You can't just say, "Iran is the greatest national security threat," and
leave it there. That is not good enough. The American people and the world deserve better from
American leaders. Ultimately, we're talking about the possibility of
nuclear war. Bob Schieffer referenced at the beginning of the debate the
Cuban missile crisis, reminding both candidates what is at stake at the
end of the day.

But nuclear war doesn't seem to phase Obama and Romney. Both men piled
on Iran during the debate and bowed down to Israel like slaves. Obama
talked about a "nuclear arms race" in the Middle East if Iran builds a
nuclear weapon ---- but what about Israel and Pakistan? The nuclear arms race in the Middle East started when Israel stole America's nuclear technology and uranium.

Why is Iran
being singled out? Obama said he will make sure Iran doesn't get a
nuclear weapon at all costs. Really? So, will Obama blow up Iran
to stop Iran from attaining the means to defend itself from aggression?
This is backwards logic.There is no sanity in official U.S. discourse about Iran.

Both Obama and Romney also repeated the fallacy
that Iranian President Ahmadinejad said he will wipe Israel off the
map. What he said was that the current government in Israel will be gone
from the page of time, quoting Khomeini. Obama says the exact same
thing when he calls for Assad to step down. Gaddafi's regime also
disappeared from the page of time, due to U.S. efforts. Ahmadinejad made a
political statement, not a genocidal statement.

What is so controversial about calling for greater openness, expansion of democracy, and protection of human rights in Israel? Former U.S. president Jimmy Carter and other world leaders
stand with the Ayatollahs on this issue, at least in principle.

If change must come to Syria and the Arab world, then why not also to Israel and the Western world? Israel and America are not beacons of
democracy and freedom, they must also undergo democratic changes and join the community of civilized nations.

I'm not defending the Islamic regime, but the talk of war
is stupid. Romney said that a "nuclear capable" Iran
provides enough political justification for U.S. military action. Does this mean
he will commit to an American invasion of Iran? What does he have in mind, exactly?

Obamney's rhetoric about Iran is dangerous and foolish. It distracts the world from the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and the collapsing global economy. When will this insanity end? If world peace is not achieved through dialogue and diplomacy, then how? If not by American leaders, then by who? Russia?
China? Will these enlightened countries lead humanity to world peace? Is
the era of American leadership over? How can America lead the world if it is not enlightened enough to distinguish between reality and fantasy?

It is interesting and significant that President Obama restated the mantras of "Al-Qaeda killed us," and "I got Bin Laden and decimated Al-Qaeda's leadership," over the course of the debate. From a logical point of view, this statement is ludicrous because Al-Qaeda has CIA roots, and its top leaders were covert CIA spies, above all Osama Bin Laden. So unless Obama fires the CIA leaders who created Al-Qaeda he can't say "I decimated Al-Qaeda's leadership." It is a lie.

History matters. Truth matters. It is a mistake for Obama and Romney to breeze over the facts and embrace the mighty wind of power, because sooner or later the winds of history will change and they will have to answer for their lies and crimes against humanity.

They cannot fall back on 9/11 and say Al-Qaeda is the reason America invaded Afghanistan in 2001. The world knows that 9/11 was an invented trauma of the Jewish and American peoples. Using an invented psychological wound to erase and excuse one's crimes from the historical record is a reflection of insanity and dishonesty.

America can be a true leader of nations and become a reliable rock in a world submerged in chaos only if it regains its sanity and deals with foreign and domestic matters honestly. Humanity is not asking American leaders to retreat from the world, but to reflect on their actions, recognize the limits to their power, and respect international law.

October 22, 2012

Romney's ignorance about the dramatic changes in warfare and the economic consequences of military overspending speaks volumes. I'm not defending Obama, but at least he knows enough to say that building more ships will not strengthen America. At least he shows common sense about this issue. America needs new underwater drones to deal with Iranian mines if a war breaks out, not more ships.

Both candidates would've served America and the world better if they laid out the consequences of a war between USrael and Iran. They did not discuss the limits of U.S. military power. 99% of their remarks were talking points and prepared bullshit.

And why are both Obama and Romney so anti-Iranian? We know it's not about the nuclear issue because Iran is not interested in acquiring nuclear weapons. Do they want war with Iran? Are they sure America will emerge victorious in an apocalyptic clash with Iran and the world of Islam? What will it take to achieve such an outcome for USrael . . . nuclear bombs on Iranian cities?

You can't just say, "Iran is the greatest national security threat," and leave it there. The American people and the world deserve better from American leaders. Ultimately, we're talking about the possibility of nuclear war. Bob Schieffer referenced at the beginning of the debate the Cuban missile crisis, reminding both candidates what is at stake at the end of the day.

But nuclear war doesn't seem to phase Obama and Romney. Both men piled on Iran during the debate and bowed down to Israel like slaves. Obama talked about a "nuclear arms race" in the Middle East if Iran builds a nuclear weapon ---- but what about Israel and Pakistan? Why is Iran being singled out? Obama said he will make sure Iran doesn't get a nuclear weapon at all costs. Really? So, will Obama blow up Iran to stop Iran from attaining the means to defend itself from aggression? This is backwards logic.

Both men also repeated the fallacy that Iranian President Ahmadinejad said he will wipe Israel off the map. What he said was that the current government in Israel will be gone from the page of time, quoting Khomeini. Obama says the exact same thing when he says Assad must step down. Gaddafi's regime also disappeared from the page of time, due to U.S. efforts. It was a political statement, not a genocidal statement.

What is so controversial about calling for greater openness, democracy, and human rights in Israel? Former U.S. president Jimmy Carter and other world leaders stand with the Ayatollahs on this issue. If change must come to Syria and the Arab world, then why not also Israel? Israel is not a beacon of democracy and freedom, it also must undergo democratic changes and join the community of civilized nations.

By the way, there are no "civilized nations" in the world today. Maybe some states in Latin America, but that's it. The states in America, Iran, and Israel are not "civilized." That is the truth.

From an amateur historian's perspective, threatening Iran in so cavalier a fashion was not wise. I'm not defending the Islamic regime, but the talk of war and sanctions is stupid and repulsive. Romney said that a "nuclear capable" Iran provides enough justification for U.S. military action. Does this mean he will commit to an American invasion of Iran? This is dangerous and foolish rhetoric. When will it end?

If not now, when? If not by American leaders, then by who? Russia? China? Will these enlightened countries lead humanity to world peace? Is the era of American leadership over?

Epictetus (AD 55 – AD 135) was a Greek sage and Stoic philosopher. He was born a slave at Hierapolis, Phrygia (present day Pamukkale, Turkey), and lived in Rome until his banishment, when he went to Nicopolis in northwestern Greece for the rest of his life. His teachings were written down and published by his pupil Arrian in his Discourses.

Philosophy, Epictetus taught, is a way of life and not just a theoretical discipline. To Epictetus, all external events are determined by fate, and are thus beyond our control; we should accept whatever happens calmly and dispassionately. However, individuals are responsible for their own actions, which they can examine and control through rigorous self-discipline.

Suffering arises from trying to control what is uncontrollable, or from neglecting what is within our power. As part of the universal city that is the universe, it is our duty to care for all our fellow men. Those who follow these precepts will achieve happiness and peace of mind.

October 21, 2012

"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." - Thomas Jefferson.

Totalitarian governments operate very predictably and foolishly. Their propaganda is so over-the-top absurd that even the most gullible and uneducated members of their permanently indoctrinated populations start becoming more and more skeptical of official government accounts of reality.

The Fascist Bureau of Intimidation, the institution that was responsible for the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and other American political reformers in the 1960s, is in the habit of abusing its authority in the post-9/11 paranoid political environment in the United States.

Last week, the FBI arrested a young man from Bangladesh named Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis for planning to blow up the New York Federal Reserve Bank. It all sounds very scary, but the FBI had everything under control. Innocent lives were never at stake because the manipulative FBI created the fake plot and supplied Nafis with a fake bomb.

Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis was provided with “inert
explosives” by federal agents and closely monitored by the FBI as he
tried to act out his plot, according to the Associated Press.

Federal prosecutors said Nafis had proposed several spots for his
attack, including the New York Stock Exchange. In a letter claiming
responsibility for the Federal Reserve plot, he said he wanted to
“destroy America.”

Nafis also provided the feds with a videotaped statement in which he
said, “We will not stop until we attain victory or martyrdom.”

Federal authorities said the public was not in danger at any point during its “sting” operation.

In reality, however, there was no al-Qaeda, there was no threat, there
were no bombs, and the only alleged “plot” the FBI “foiled” was the one
it helped hatch with its dupe, Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis. Like
the vast majority of recent domestic “terror” schemes against the
United States, the latest supposed “operation” was essentially run by
authorities from start to finish.

There are very imaginative people working for the FBI. They must watch a lot of movies in their offices. Action and spy films probably motivated them to join the FBI in the first place, rather than any sense of patriotism or love for public service.

How can FBI officers justify making up fake threats to the U.S. while covering up real threats? There are no domestic or foreign security threats to the United States government except London-Wall Street bankers, Mossad, and the rogue shadow CIA. Instead of catching the real bad guys, FBI officials spend all their time finding Muslim dupes, give them fake bombs, tell them what to say, and then stand back and let the magic happen.

After every one of its staged terror stunts, the FBI invites television crews and issues grand public statements about how they prevented a great disaster. This is really silly stuff. This is not something that sane adults do. Sane adults do not create terror plots out of scratch and manufacture fake emergencies. This is what failed states that have no political legitimacy do.

Pakistan's security services is also neck-deep in this kind of fear-mongering, stupidity, and nonsense. They use the fear of the Taliban, an organization that they created with the CIA, which they continue to fund and arm, in order to justify the draconian use of state power.

Seriously, has the FBI no shame? Do FBI officials have self-respect? Are there any patriots left in this insane institution?

We all know the answer.

The entire U.S. political establishment has become a total joke. The FBI's invented case of a Jihadist aiming to blow up the Federal Reserve is part of a larger government narrative, the purpose of which is to make the American people believe that the Federal Reserve is a victim of a grand conspiracy involving Jihadists, libertarians, Occupy Wall Street activists, and Tea Party conservatives.

The conspiracy theorists in the totalitarian government in Washington are pushing the paranoid view that Al-Qaeda and the Tea Party will form a strategic, political, and ideological alliance and take revenge on America.

So, we're supposed to believe that drugged up Muslim dupes in Al-Qaeda and anti-Muslim, hardcore American patriots in the Tea Party will team up and fight America? Okaaay. The hijacked U.S. government has officially gone batshit crazy. It has entered tin-foil hat territory.

An academic study about the future use of the military as a peacekeeping
force within the United States written by a retired Army Colonel
depicts a shocking scenario in which the U.S. Army is used to restore
order to a town that has been seized by Tea Party “insurrectionists”.
.
.
Citing the Declaration of Independence and the fact that the federal
government is not deriving its “just powers from the consent of the
governed,” the Tea Party rebels draw support from, “other tea party
groups, militias, racist organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan,
anti-immigrant associations such as the Minutemen, and other right-wing
groups.” The paper goes on to add how Al-Qaeda terrorists also may
hijack the crisis outlined in the scenario or join forces with the Tea
Party rebels.

It is no secret that one of the biggest political targets of populist anger in the United States is the privately managed Federal Reserve cartel, which has protected the big banks at the cost of impoverishing America's national infrastructure and economic health. Basically, the criminal Federal Reserve has financially raped the United States.

By stimulating fake terror cases in which the Federal Reserve is presented as the victim of global Islamic Jihadists, the FBI is masking the political corruption of this criminal and vampiric institution that has aided and abetted financial treason against the United States.

The idea that idiotic Jihadists and Al-Qaeda would want to target the Federal Reserve is ridiculous. They don't even know what the Federal Reserve is, who created it, and when it was created, so how can they be angry at what it is doing? Al-Qaeda only targets what the CIA tells it to target because it is controlled by the CIA. If the CIA ordered Al-Qaeda to target Mecca and burn down the Kaaba, Al-Qaeda would do it.

This guy Nafis is a joke. There is no Islamic Jihad against the Federal Reserve. The real and true "Jihad" against the Federal Reserve began in 1776 by Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, James Madison, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and the other great founding fathers of America.

They declared a war on private central banks and gross financial speculation, and won. Washington fought against what the Federal Reserve represents, and here is the FBI betraying Washington's legacy by defending the Federal Reserve. It is pitiful and outrageous. Taking the side of financial tyranny is morally wrong and politically unjustifiable.

It must always be remembered that the Federal Reserve is NOT America. It is a leech upon America. There is nothing federal about it. Ron Paul is a bigger national institution than the Fed. This illegitimate, illegal, unnecessary, treasonous, and corrupt institution was not around when America was created.

A hundred years of economic data has proven what a monstrous institution the Fed is and that the founders were right about the ills of private central banking. A private central bank should've never been created in America. The Fed steals and destroys the wealth of the American people. That is all it does.

If Thomas Jefferson was alive in our time he would write a Declaration of Independence from the Federal Reserve and declare an eternal jihad against it. And, in turn, the treacherous FBI would label him a domestic terrorist. That is how crazy, moronic, deceitful, and corrupt the FBI has become. Anything it says is propaganda and must be rejected at face value.

Israel's extremist and expansionist government is influencing the American election and the Lebanese election. The evidence shows that Mossad was behind the recent car bombing in Beirut. They have a habit of doing these types of things. The CIA also may have had a hand in it, as well as the Saudi intelligence agency.

What should the world's response be to USrael's transgressions against international law? It is clear. It's time for the international community to start demanding regime change in Israel and the United States. It is long overdue. If Israel's criminal leaders and Washington's criminal leaders want to stick their noses in other people's countries then the same should be done to them.

The world is sick and tired of the criminal and barbaric leaders in the U.S. and Israel. Assad is a saint compared to them.

Evgeny Morozov, born 1984 in Soligorsk, Belarus, is a writer and researcher who studies political and social implications of technology.

Morozov is a visiting scholar at Stanford University,[3] a fellow at the New America Foundation, and a contributing editor of and blogger for Foreign Policy magazine, for which he writes the blog Net Effect. He has previously been a Yahoo! fellow at Georgetown University's Walsh School of Foreign Service, a fellow at the Open Society Institute, director of new media at the NGO Transitions Online, and a columnist for the Russian newspaper Akzia. In 2009 he was chosen as a TED fellow where he spoke about how the Web influences civic engagement and regime stability in authoritarian, closed societies or in countries "in transition."

YouTube video description [Channel - VPROinternational]:

Smartphones and social media seem to be the new weapons used to topple
both dictators and old power structures. The euphoria over the Internet
and its revolutionary role seems endless. One man, Evgeny Morozov
states that this is nothing more than a mirage. He takes Backlight into
his battle against cyber utopianism.

Surrounded by enormous
video screens, Evgeny Morozov is visually bombarded with thoughts and
situations on the effects of the technological revolution on
totalitarianism, democracy and the people concerned. Morozov shares his
criticism, flow of thought and dilemma's with us. Morozov is an angry
young man who fights the cyber-utopianism that is so dominant in today's
world.

Morozov grew up in communist Belarus and was just 5 years
old when the Berlin wall fell. While working for a NGO in the former
Soviet Republics and Central Asia he tried to organize revolts using
social media. Disappointed with the impact, he wrote the book "The Net
Dellusion: How Not To Liberate The World". His status on Twitter
currently is: "in transit". In the installation Morozov engages in an
intellectual battle with a remix of VPRO documentary-clips from the last
15 years. Spontaneously he reacts on the dilemma's presented to him,
while moving around in what he himself sees as a panopticon; leading to a
vivid dialogue with the images.

"We believe that using nuclear weapons is haraam and prohibited and that it is everybody’s duty to make efforts to protect humanity against this great disaster." - Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, from a speech given on April 13, 2011.

It has the potential to help Mr. Obama make the case that he is nearing a
diplomatic breakthrough in the decade-long effort by the world’s major
powers to curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, but it could pose a risk if
Iran is seen as using the prospect of the direct talks to buy time.

Who was really behind this latest incident in Beirut that has triggered violent clashes in the streets? As always, we must look to the Mossad because of the numerous historical examples of Mossad false flags in its region and around the world.

The motive is clear. The insane oligarchical governments of the U.S. and Israel are seeking to create a new civil war in Lebanon. They are exporting terrorism to Syria and exploiting the sectarian divisions in Lebanese society.

"Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran
have all condemned the bombing and cite it as a provocation to start a
greater sectarian war, from which none will benefit. Each in turn
suspect Israel and the West, as greater sectarian tension is expected to
result, playing into long documented attempts by US, Israel, and Saudi
Arabia to trigger a sectarian war they hope will be the downfall of
Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran.

Suspicious op-eds in pro-Western "Lebanon Now"
insist that Syria is responsible, and again without evidence, concludes
that blaming Israel is inappropriate, and that the Wall Street-London
militant beachhead is by far a lesser threat to Lebanon than what it
calls "the most deadly virus" of President Bashar al-Assad's Syria.

Hariri in 2007 was, according to US journalist Seymour Hersh, building
an armed militant front in northern Lebanon, across the boarder from
Homs, Syria. Many of these militants admittedly had direct ties to Al
Qaeda, and with US, Israeli, and Saudi support, they were continuously
armed, funded, and prepared for the sectarian bloodbath now unfolding.
Homs to this day remains as one of the strongholds for terrorist
militants operating in Syria."

"Professor Konstantin Meyl specializes in scalar waves and neutrino power, which are extensions of some of the work done by Nikola Tesla." [Source].

YouTube video description [Channel - WitteHenning]:

Nikola Tesla was the biggest scientific genius in the last century.
Today this is Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl from Villingen, Black Forrest,
Germany. He has not only organized a revival of Tesla but developed his
research to mindboggling levels. He detected that every vortex has a
counterpart, a so-called potential vortex, being able to form matter. He
shows that electrons, protons, neutrinos etc. are double vortexes,
without needing a postulate. By that he proofs, that there are two more
types of waves besides the already well-known electromagnetic wave
(Hertz 1888). Tesla (1899) detected the electric scalar wave and Meyl
the magnetic scalar wave, giving access to free energy, huge over unity
effects. The magnetic scalar wave, as an aspect of the neutrinos and
therefore beeing quicker than light, is used in all biology, so Meyl can
explain how the DNA is sending information and energy as an antenna
using a DNA wave.

He describes what electro smog is and how we can
avoid this. The cell phone industry, the TV/radio and computer industry
and the car manufacturers could revolutionize their products by using
scalar waves instead of electromagnetic waves, because they are more
healthy, use less energy and have one dimension more to transport
information.

And finally Meyl found the unified field theory, which a
lot of scientists have searched for since long time. Even Einstein did
not succeed. He trapped himself in the wrong information that nothing is
quicker than light.

Marcus Aurelius (April 26, 121 CE. – March 17, 180 CE.), was Roman Emperor from 161 to 180 CE. He ruled with Lucius Verus as co-emperor from 161 until Verus' death in 169. He was the last of the "Five Good Emperors", and is also considered one of the most important members of the Stoic philosophers. During his reign, the Empire defeated a revitalized Parthian Empire; Aurelius' general Avidius Cassius sacked the capital Ctesiphon in 164. Aurelius fought the Marcomanni, Quadi, and Sarmatians with success during the Marcomannic Wars, but the threat of the Germanic tribes began to represent a troubling reality for the Empire. A revolt in the East led by Avidius Cassius failed to gain momentum and was suppressed immediately.

Marcus Aurelius' Stoic tome Meditations, written in Greek while on campaign between 170 and 180, is still revered as a literary monument to a philosophy of service and duty, describing how to find and preserve equanimity in the midst of conflict by following nature as a source of guidance and inspiration.

YouTube video description [Channel - Gottfried Leibniz]:

The philosopher who held absolute power. How did he act virtuously? Peter Adamson explains in his podcast.