Using productive farmland to grow crops for food instead of fuel is more energy efficient, Michigan State University scientists concluded, after poring over 17 years' worth of data to help settle the food versus fuel debate.

'It's 36 percent more efficient to grow grain for food than for fuel,' said Ilya Gelfand, an MSU postdoctoral researcher. 'The ideal is to grow corn for food, then leave half the leftover stalks and leaves on the field for soil conservation and produce cellulosic ethanol with the other half.'

Other studies have looked at energy efficiencies for crops over shorter time periods, but this MSU study is the first to consider energy balances of an entire cropping system over many years. The results are published in the April 19 online issue of the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

'It comes down to what's the most efficient use of the land,' said Phil Robertson, a University Distinguished Professor of crop and soil sciences and one of the paper's authors. 'Given finite land resources, will it be more efficient to use productive farmland for food or fuel?

One compromise would be to use productive farmland for both - to use the grain for food and the other parts of the plant for fuel where possible. Another would be to reserve productive farmland for food and to grow biofuel grasses - cellulosic biomass - on less productive land.'

He, Gelfand and Sieglinde Snapp, another co-author and an MSU associate professor of crop and soil sciences, analyzed data collected from 1989 to 2007 at the W.K. Kellogg Long-Term Ecological Research site. That National Science Foundation-funded project studies ecology and environmental biology to provide a better understanding of both natural and managed systems. It is the only agricultural program in the 26-site NSF national LTER network.

The scientists compared the energy inputs and outputs of producing corn, soybeans and wheat and energy balances for growing alfalfa, an important forage plant that can be used either for biofuel or for beef cattle feed.

Robertson and Gelfand also are members of the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, a partnership between Michigan State and the University of Wisconsin-Madison funded by the U.S. Department of Energy to conduct basic research aimed at solving some of the most complex problems in converting natural materials to energy.

'This research is aimed at policymakers who have to decide how and where biofuels should be grown and the best way to encourage farmers to follow those suggestions,' Robertson said.

'The promise of biofuels made from biomass is huge, from both climate mitigation and economic perspectives,' he said. 'But the promise could come up short if we don't pay attention to details such as the land on which they are grown.'

The research is funded by the GLBRC, the NSF and the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station.

For more information on Michigan State University's biofuel and bioenergy research, visit: www.bioeconomy.msu.edu.

Related news

December 2, 2016 --Last night's dinner could be tomorrow's liquid fuel. Yes, the technology to turn ordinary human waste into biocrude oil is here, thanks to developments at the Department of Energy'sPacific Northwest National Laboratory.
The technology -- called hydrothermal liquefaction -- mimics the geological conditions the Earth uses to create crude oil by using high pressure and temperature to achieve in minutes something that takes Mother Nature millions of years. The resulting material is similar to...

On November 16, 2016, the White House filed the Mid-Century Strategy for Deep Decarbonization with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change under the Paris climate deal. The strategy highlights the role that U.S. government-funded research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) had on the technological advances of the last century, and the potential to increase the pace and reduce the costs of decarbonization using the full power of U.S. RD&D efforts focused on clean energy technologies.
T...

On November 23, 2016, EPA Administrator, Gina McCarthy, signed the final rule on the RFS volume standards for 2017 and biobased diesel standards for 2018. This final rule will increase the renewable fuel volume requirements as reported in the Biobased and Renewable Products Advocacy Group (BRAG) post “EPA Releases Proposed Renewable Fuel Volume Requirements.” The proposed volume requirements are:
Cellulosic biofuel, from 230 million gallons in 2016 to 311 million gallons in 2017;
Advanced biofuel,...

Leaders of Sustainable Biofuels (LSB) welcome the European Commission proposal for a review of the Renewable Energy Directive, which sets the legislative framework for the implementation of the EU 2030 Climate and Energy policy objectives.We believe that by recognizing the role of advanced biofuels as a fast track option for the decarbonisation of the EU transport sector, the European Commission has made a significant step to enhance the EU innovation capacity and stimulate green growth.LSB particularly welcomes...

The National Biodiesel Board (NBB) welcomed the release of new standards to support American jobs and energy security. The group applauds the administration for working to reduce America’s dependence on fossil fuels by raising biodiesel volumes under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).
“The real winners with this announcement are American consumers who will now have access to even more cleaner burning, advanced biofuel,” said NBB CEO Donnell Rehagen. “These benefits extend far beyond the...

Customer comments

No comments were found for More energy efficient to grow crops for food than fuel. Be the first to comment!