Commission: Ms Marvel nude

Update: It seems that, predictably, Social justice warriors are butthurt about my Hugo awards nomination and, as they try to find anything to attack me, they have targeted this drawing, accusing me of doing Child pornography, or of “pedophilia”, because aparently the character must be 16 in one of it’s versions (something i didn’t even know, but that’s beyond the point) and want me to remove the drawing.

Since i’m a sane person who doesn’t go to Tumblr, my first, short, and concise reaction about those claims and petition is: Fuck you. I’m not removing shit. I’m not gona censor myself because you got offended.

Instead, i’ll be lecturing them in some dosis of reality. Because they very much need it.

So, we have a drawing of a character with an adult body, whos just standing still while half naked. Calling the reactions i’ve seen “overreactions” would be a compliment, as is tremendusly tame, and the internet is full to the head of erotic or hentai drawings of anime characters of 16-17 years old.

First of, this is a DRAWING. You know, those things that are done with pencils and colors and stuff? like, you know, without absolutely no participation or harm of any real person? yes, that, you got it. So, a drawing is NOT child pornography. It’s NOT REAL, ok? it’s just a combination of lines placed in an specific way by an artist, not an actual person doing anything. Even if i actually drawed a little children having sex (which i have not), it would still not be child pornography, as no real person has done, or been done, anything. Drawings of characters of any age are legal in almost all the countries in the world, and Spain is one of them. Sucks to be you, Canada.

Secondly, calling a developed body of an anime style drawing of a 16 years old “pedophilia” is like the most retarded thing anyone can ever say. Pedophilia is the attraction for underdeveloped bodies, for children who have not yet passed puberty. Pedophilia is not the “number”. A pedophile is not someone who feels attraction for a woman with the body of Scarlett johanson who happens to be 17 years and 360 days. It’s someone who feels attracted by someone with an 8 years old body. What, do you think that pedophiles feel nothing when they look to a child and then someone says “oh, and she/he has 8 years old” and then suddenly they have an erection? do you think they get erections looking at the number 8 or something? bullshit.

“Pedophilia” would be feeling attracted to a drawing of an 8 years old who is clearly visualy depicted as an 8 years old. Now look at how my characters (or any anime character, since i see this accusation being throwed a lot by SJWs about anime) are drawed. They have adult, attractive, developed bodies. Even if a character has “16”, it’s drawn with an adult body. That’s NOT pedophilia. You cannot look at characters like the ones in Dead or alive and say it’s pedophilia because some of them are 16. That’s simply retarded. (fuck, they even use the same body bases for many of them, they just change the age in the character description). And the same for my drawings. You cannot look at a drawing like this and say it’s pedophilia because she technicaly has 16 in the original comic. Specialy because i didn’t know her age, and just drawed a body of about 20 years old! don’t you see how ridiculous this is? if i say “it’s ms.marvel when she grows to 20 years old” it’s suddenly ok?

And third, imaginary characters have no “age”. The age of a fictional character is just a number put there by the creator. It means nothing. You can as well say she has 14 or 30 depending on the drawing style. Do you want me to show some examples to see how ridiculous you sound? look closely:

-The “kid” in the far right side of this image has 27 years old. Not pedophilia by SJW standards. The blue hair girl in middle has 1 year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards. The guy at the far left has 8.000 years old. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPT3UPWYAEgLc4.jpg:large

-And what about Real life series of school life? the actors for those roles are usually 20+ or even 30, but in the series they are suposedly 16-17. So, if you like them you are a pedophile?

-If i just say that a drawing is “the character if she had 18 years old” then it would be ok, even if i drawed her exactly the same as the original 18 version?

Don’t worry because i can simplify all this: What’s important is the body. Being attracted to developed, past puberty, adult bodies is completely normal, regardless of the “number” the artist decides to write in the character profile. That’s why there are so many anime characters that people are attracted to even if they are technicaly 16 (which, btw, is the age of consent for japan, spain, and many other places), because their bodies are drawn so adult that they can be any range between 16-30, or even 14 if you want to go to Evangelion. And for fucks sake look at this image: http://k39.kn3.net/taringa/2/1/1/4/2/3/20/cyan_miku/862.jpg?2207

That’s the most amazing part. I drew a body similar to the image reference they sent me, which is a body arround 18-20 years. The only reason this people say she’s 16 it’s because they have read it in the accusation. If they just watched the drawing without knowing her age they would not think she’s 16.

‘Accusing scifi fandoms of harboring pedofiles’ I know I shouldnt believ this bollocks but what do the mean with that? Did you accuse other artists of making art for pedofiles, is there a longer story behind it or are they making this up?

To be honest with you. When we’re speaking of fictional entities I don’t think the body or the age even matters. No one is going to be hurt by people jacking it to something which doesn’t exist. Just as no one is going to be hurt when hundreds of thousands of characters of varying ages are killed in any fictional material.

I’m glad we sorted this out before I had a crisis of conscience over all the people I’ve murdered in GTA and Battlefield over the last 10 years.

Honestly I don’t think Kukuryo should have given such a long response to these stupid claims. He should have just drawn a stick figure, labeled it “5 years old” and said “I’m sorry this turns you on Sarah Nyberg”.

Don’t take this down. Artwork is NOT child pornography by any standard. This drawing is NOT illegal and is protected by the 1st Amendment of the United States of America. The feds might want you to think otherwise but they can go fuck themselves. Laws guide us, right? Good, so fuck the feds and the SJWs and keep fighting the good fight. They can and will go to hell. Peace.

I’m sorry for all the shit you’re dealing with from people that obviously have trouble seperating fiction and reality. Not all that surprising, I suppose, considering this is likely the same crowd that believes video games can turn people into violent misogynists.

To those that want to censor and police art: fuck off. No one is making you view this. Just close the browser window if it offends you (also, you are utterly pathetic if this offends you). Whether the fictional character being drawn is 18, 16, 9, or 9000 years old makes no difference because they’re not real. They have no rights. There has been no crime, and there are no victims. Your dislike of a piece of artwork is nothing more than a matter of personal taste. I’m sorry your taste is shit.

Yeah, it seems that many of today’s problems with videogames come from people who can’t diferenciate reality from fiction. They seem to think that everything that happens in a fictional world is 100% the same as real life, and thus sexuality is wrong, killing a woman is wrong, etc.

It’s one thing that you keep playing with underage characters like the degenerate you are, but the fact that you keep labeling your diarrhea leakage on canvas as “art” is the most offensive thing out of all this.

You all need help, and some art classes, cause this shit is Top tier fugly.

As a teenager…if I would have had a pc in my youth…I would have went out of my way to look for Rule 34 stuff. lol. I love it how when people bring up the “Must protect the children!” complaint they try to awkwardly lump in teens with that as if teens and little kids are exactly the same thing. Fears of parents withstanding, teens “are” sexual and have their own sexual agency. This and I’m very sure when a comic book artist draws Star Fire,Raven,or X-23 they deliberately made such characters attractive to both teens and adults. It’s just good for moving issues.

Don’t get me wrong,there are some great over-weight or otherwise not traditionally attractive characters I like a lot. (Like Amanda Waller who is so tough she can even keep the justice league in check) but “sexy skin” still greases palms with cash. We’re biological beings and we like depictions of biology in motion! (especially if it’s sexy!)

Regardless,these are drawings,not “real acts” effecting real people. I mean I’m not particularly fond of goro (violent snuff porn) or xxx-rated lolicon BUT if it satiates the dark desires of some ppl out there so they do not end up committing “real crimes” I’m fine with it existing even if I disapprove. Studies even show that hobbies such as video games, drawing,writing, & table-top role-playing that give us the ability to somehow “act out” sexual or violence related fantasies reduce the rates of real criminal activity overall. Just food for thought.