Author Comments

I dont know what inspired me to make this movie again, but this is definately my favourite version. The original was done several years ago in "swish". Since then I've learned a lot. The first flash version, which is also on NG, is far less professional than this one, but if anyone wants to see how much I've improved, this is a good model for that.

-Slink

Reviews

Rated 3.5 / 5 stars2006-11-27 21:10:02

(( LOL ))

~~REVIEW~~
Haha this was funny, i had fun with this one, i like the colortones especialy, but it was abit short, you shoyld add more to it, it seemed short but with all that said you should add more, anyways nice job.

Rated 0 / 5 stars2006-07-13 22:21:05

The first one was stupid and poorly made,

this one is just stupid. Your flash skills may have improved a bit, but you're still not very good, and to make matters worse the story isn't enjoyable at all. It's just stupid. Is this the best idea you could come up with? I've looked at your other stuff and it's all just stupid to. From your flash movies I get the idea that you're 5 years old, and not a talented 5 year old either.

You really need to come up with a good storyline above everything else, like I said the graphics were okay, but the storyline sucked.

This particular flash was not intended to have a plot. Nor were most of my other flash. Lucky Charms 3 and The Adventures of Punchy the Pirate (neither of which have been released yet) are the first movies intended to have a set-in-stone script with a plot. My other movies are random for the sake of it.

Rated 4 / 5 stars2006-06-16 23:26:48

Rated 4 / 5 stars2006-06-16 18:15:27

...

People seem to be looking straight at the humour and the randomness and missing the important points, the amazing graphics, the shadows on the opening scene with the hills and the outgoing circle background near the end are very well done, the cloak is done well and the whole animation shows signs of professional flash cartoon making.