Welcome to the home of The Question Evolution Project. Presenting information demonstrating that there is no truth in minerals-to-man evolution, and presenting evidence for special creation. —Established by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

Monday, December 10, 2012

Blue Stars Indicate a Young Universe

Blue
stars cause a problem for cosmologists: They should not exist. Since
they are bigger and hotter than other stars, and their fuel supply
should be exhausted comparatively quickly. Blue stars exist on our own Milky Way galaxy.

In
a manner reminiscent of the Oort Cloud excuse for replenishing
short-term comets, cosmologists say that certain areas are "stellar
nurseries" where new stars are being formed. Except that there is no
observational evidence of such a thing, it only exists in theory.
Biblical creationists do not need to conjure up excuses like the Oort
Cloud or stellar nurseries.

Orion is one of the most well-known and easily recognized
constellations of the winter sky. The three bright blue stars in Orion’s
belt seem to draw our attention instantly. Such stars are a strong confirmation of the biblical timescale.

Most stars generate energy by the process of nuclear fusion of hydrogen
into helium in the stellar core. This is a very efficient power source.
Theoretically, a star like the sun has enough hydrogen in its core to
keep it burning for ten billion years. But that’s not the case with blue
stars.

Blue stars are always more massive than the sun. This means they have
more hydrogen available as fuel. Yet, blue stars are much brighter than
the sun; some are over 200,000 times brighter! They are
“burning” their fuel much more quickly than the sun, and therefore
cannot last billions of years. Based on their observed luminosity, the
most massive blue stars cannot last even one million years before
running out of fuel.