Rev.1: 8. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.---Jesus is the Alpha and Omega- the Almighty!
Daniel 11:33. And they that understand among the people shall instruct many: yet they shall fall by the sword, and by flame, by captivity, and by spoil, many days.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

By Dan Crosby of THE DAILY PENEditor: Penbrook JohannsonThursday, April 12, 2012

NEW YORK, NY
– After a Maricopa County law enforcement agency conducted a six-month
forensic examination which determined that the image of Obama’s alleged
1961 Certificate of Live Birth posted to a government website in April,
2011 is a digital fabrication and that it did not originate from a
genuine paper document, arguments from an Obama eligibility lawyer
during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing reveals the image
was not only a fabrication, but that it was likely part of a contrived
plot by counterfeiters to endow Obama with mere political support while
simultaneously making the image intentionally appear absurd and,
therefore, invalid as evidence toward proving Obama’s ineligibility in a
court of law.

Taking an audacious and shocking angle against the constitutional eligibility mandate, Obama’s
lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth
certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it
cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born
citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.

Hill
went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke
his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a
candidate.

At the hearing, attorney for the plaintiffs,
Mario Apuzzo, correctly argued that Obama, under the Constitution, has
to be a “natural born Citizen” and that he has not met his burden of
showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by
showing that he is indeed a “natural born Citizen.” He argued that Obama
has shown no authenticate evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State
demonstrating who he is and that he was born in the United States.
Apuzzo also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born
Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.

As Obama’s legal argument becomes more contorted, he is being forced
to avoid an ever shrinking legal space, and an increasing weight, of his
failure to meet constitutional eligibility requirements.
Hill,
of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, made a desperate
motion to dismiss the ballot objection arguing that Obama’s lack of
natural-born citizenship status was not relevant to being placed on the
New Jersey presidential ballot because no law exists in New Jersey which
says that a candidate’s appearance on the ballot must be supported by
evidence of natural born citizenship status. Only the U.S. constitution
restricts eligibility to hold the office of president to natural born
citizens.

Judge Masin denied the motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.

“Sadly,
regardless of her moral deficiency, Hill is legally justified,” says
TDP Editor, Penbrook Johannson, “Obama’s eligibility is a separate
matter than the charges of forgery and fraud. Of course, we have
evidence that he is not eligible. But, evidence of forgery by as yet
unidentified counterfeiters working on behalf of Obama is not what
legally excludes Obama from appearing on a ballot, by itself, until some
authority is willing to consider this as evidence of forgery on its
merit as an indication of actual ineligibility in a court of legal
authority. Until some court of competent jurisdiction is willing to hear
evidence of forgery and fraud, you can’t legally punish a political
candidate for that crime which has not been proven that they committed.
However, since Obama is not eligible because of a lack of authenticated
evidence to the contrary, he could be held off the ballot for that
reason.”

According to Johannson, there is an overwhelming level of
moral certainty that Obama is a usurper, but until a court with
jurisdiction considers this case, Obama’s status as a legitimate
president is in limbo.

“He does not exist as a president except in the imagination of those
who blindly support him. Whereas he is politically desired by a
transient consensus, his legality is unresolved until a responsible
court makes a determination. This is the essence of our crisis. Our
nation exists in a state of non-authorized identity. Obama is just some
guy calling himself a president and living in the White House without
the confirmative authority to do so.”

Obama’s document forgery and
fraudulent presidency have now forced him to flee to a “strange
twilight zone” between political popularity and legal legitimacy where
poorly counterfeited records are apparently allowed to be published by
Obama using government media resources for political purposes, yet those
same records are held by the courts as irrelevant for determining
Obama’s legal eligibility status because they are, according to judges,
“so poorly forged” they are obviously meant to be satirical and not to
be taken seriously as evidence.

Shockingly, parting from
widespread public ignorance, Hill actually acknowledged two of the three
necessary components of determining natural born citizenship as being
place of birth and citizenship status of both parents. However, she
argued that, “No law in New Jersey obligated him (Obama) to produce any
such evidence in order to get on the primary ballot.”

The third component of natural born eligibility is maintenance of
natural born citizenship status from birth to election without
interruption, involuntarily or voluntarily, due to expatriation,
extradition, renouncement or foreign adoption.

“Obama is mocking
our constitution,” says Johannson, “His position is that he never
claimed the image was an indication of his natural born status, just
that it was information about his birth. Whether it is forged or
authentic is irrelevant to Obama because plausible deniability affords
him the security in knowing that no legal authority is willing to hang
him with it.”

Of course, Johannson adds that it makes Obama look
like a willing accomplice and a liar, but, he says, “…show me a
politician who cares about being seen as a liar by the public. If people
who support him want to vote for a person like that, it reveals more
about the reprobate character of Obama supporters than competency of any
legal determination about his lack of constitutional eligibility.
Degenerates will vote for a degenerate while patriots will exhaust all
civil means to remove him…until those civil means are exhausted. Then
things get ugly for government.”

“However, Hill is also
essentially admitting that Obama is not a legitimate president and that
Obama believes that his illegitimacy does not matter to his legal
ability to hold the office. Obama holds to a political tenet, not a
legal one with respect to his views on his eligibility. That’s what
corrupt, criminal politicians do. When the law convicts them, they run
to public favorability for shelter with the hope that their supporters
will apply pressure to disregard law in their case.”

Obama is now arguing that because he is politically popular, as he
points to as being indicated by his so-called ‘election’, despite
accusations of eligibility fraud and election fraud, the constitutional
eligibility mandate is not relevant, in his view. Until a courageous
authority is willing to disagree and hold Obama to an equally weighted
legal standard, civil remedies for the Obama problem are limited.

Johannson adds that Obama is making the same argument on behalf of Obamacare.
“If
he had the gall to actually tell the Supreme Court that they have no
authority to determine the unconstitutionality of his illegitimate
policies, what makes anyone think he believes they have the authority to
disqualify him due to his lack of constitutional eligibility? Obama
believes he holds preeminent power over all branches of government
because of his delusions of political grandeur.”

He correctly
points to a lifetime pattern of behavior and testimony by Obama which
indicates a complete lack of regard for the U.S. Constitution when it
restricts Obama’s political agenda and lust for power.

“This is a
guy who illegally defaced public property when he scribed his
aspirations to be ‘king’ in a concrete sidewalk at the age of ten, for
God’s sake. Now, his ‘majesty’ wants to put his illegal ‘graffiti’ into
American law books. However, his problem is that he has to face the fact
that he is an abject failure in his capacity to meet any standard
required by the 250-year-old U.S. Constitution, in everything he tries
to do. The Constitution owns him and he can’t stand it. He hates it.
Therefore, instead of admitting his lack of constitutionality, he simply
breaks the rules and proceeds to illegally scribe his fake authority on
everything until someone is willing to physically stop him. Obama is
not just an illegitimate politician, he is a rogue outlaw without regard
for the divine providence of American law.”

Apuzzo submitted that New Jersey law requires Obama to show evidence
that he is qualified for the office he wishes to occupy and that
includes showing that he is a “natural born Citizen,” which includes
presenting evidence of who he is, where he was born, and that he was
born to two U.S. citizen parents. Apuzzo added that the Secretary of
State has a constitutional obligation not to place any ineligible
candidates on the election ballot.

H.CON.RES.107Latest Title: Expressing the sense of Congress that the use
of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear
authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high
crime and misdemeanor under Article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Sponsor: Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3]
(introduced 3/7/2012)
Cosponsors (5)
Latest Major Action: 3/7/2012
Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed-Not exactly live, and not nearly all inclusive!

Total Pageviews

Subscribe To

Laminin

video post April 22, 08

The End Game..

The Bohemian Grove

Alex Jones Video

What others are saying...

--------------------------------------------------------

Our Reviews

"This site is right on target with the way that I have been thinking. It has definitely been bookmarked and I will be subscribing to the RSS feed. The content is relevant and something that all need to read. The site was easy to navigate. Keep up the good work!!!"