Abstract

The use of low-quality informal health-care providers (IHCPs) is still prominent in developing countries despite the efforts of their governments to expand institutional services. The use of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs have become instrumental in encouraging the use of formal health services, but little is known about their direct effect on the use of IHCPs. We use a large survey of rural households and a regression discontinuity design to estimate the effects of the Peruvian CCT program on the demand for IHCP. We find a sizeable reduction in the use of IHCPs not only in targeted but also in non-targeted members of treated households. This finding indicates the existence of spillover effects within the household. We also provide evidence that beyond the direct increase in income, the availability of better information about institutional
services is a potential mechanism that drives these effects. We also find a corresponding improvement in the self-perception of health status. Our results are robust to a number of sensitivity analyses.

Sánchez, A., Meléndez, G., and Behrman, J. R. (2016). The impact of the Juntos conditional cash transfer programme
in Peru on nutritional and cognitive outcomes: Does the age of exposure matter? Young Lives Working Paper, 153.

VerPloeg, M. (2009). Do benefits of U.S. food assistance programs for children spillover to older children in the same household? Journal of Family Issues, 30:412–427.

Witvorapong, N. and Foshanji, A. I. (2016). The impact of a conditional cash transfer program on the utilization of
non-targeted services: Evidence from Afghanistan. Social Science & Medicine, 152:87–95.