Transcription

2 WHAT IS THE JONES ACT? Important pieces of maritime legislation are: The Shipping Act of 1916 (46 App. U.S.C. 802). The Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (1920 Act) (46 App. U.S.C. 876). The Merchant Marine Act of These pieces of legislation have been supplemented by amendments to cargo preference laws and the Maritime Security Act of 1996 (P.L ). A brief legislative history is provided below.

3 HISTORY OF MARITIME POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES The foundation of maritime policy in the United States is legislation that Congress enacted to ensure sufficient sealift capacity to carry U.S. commercial and military cargo during World War I ( ) and legislation that was largely a response to the economic conditions of the Great Depression.

4 SHIPPING ACT OF 1916 Congress reacted to the threats posed to U.S. shipping by World War I by enacting the Shipping Act of 1916, which, among other things: Established the U.S. merchant marine as a naval auxiliary, and reserved certain government cargoes for U.S.-citizen ship owners. When World War I ended, the U.S. government controlled a large merchant fleet built through a significant ship construction program undertaken by the U.S. during that war. However, while the U.S. fleet was largely committed to the war relief effort, European allies placed their ships back into commercial trades. The result was reduced commercial cargoes for the over-sized U.S.- flagged commercial fleet. In response to this situation, the Congress passed the 1920 Act.

5 THE MERCHANT MARINE ACT OF 1920 The Merchant Marine Act of 1920 created government support for the U.S.-flagged merchant marine. The preamble to the 1920 Act established goals that are supposed to drive U.S. maritime policy today, albeit these goals have been modified by subsequent legislation: it is necessary for the national defense and for the proper growth of its foreign and domestic commerce that the United States shall have a merchant marine of the best equipped and most suitable types of vessels sufficient to carry the greater portion of its commerce and serve as a naval or military auxiliary in time of war or national emergency, ultimately to be owned and operated privately by citizens of the United States; and it is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States to do whatever is necessary to develop and encourage the maintenance of such a merchant marine.

6 THE MERCHANT MARINE ACT OF 1920 Key elements of the 1920 Act included the establishment of cabotage as a fundamental component of U.S. maritime policy and the creation of a construction loan program to aid U.S. operators in constructing ships in U.S. shipyards. In the 1930s, the Great Depression, combined with economic policies that had the effect of limiting U.S. foreign trade, nearly caused the collapse of the U.S. merchant marine. Congress responded to this circumstance and sought to prepare for possible military conflict with the enactment of the Merchant Marine Act of 1936.

7 THE MERCHANT MARINE ACT OF 1936 The Merchant Marine Act of 1936 fully acknowledged U.S. operators dependence on strong government support and included a mix of direct and indirect subsidies and marketoriented programs to promote the U.S. flag. The Merchant Marine Act of 1936 also provided an indirect subsidy in the form of the Capital Construction Fund (CCF). The CCF enables U.S. operators of U.S.-flagged merchant ships to set aside tax deferred earnings into a special account for the purpose of building ships in U.S. shipyards. The Merchant Marine Act of 1936 retreated from the commitment made in the 1920 Act to develop a U.S. merchant fleet capable of carrying the greater portion of U.S. foreign commerce in favor of the vague objective of maintaining a U.S. merchant fleet capable of carrying a substantial portion of U.S. foreign commerce.

8 SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE JONES ACT Generally, the Jones Act requires that any vessel operating in the coastwise trade between two U.S. ports be U.S.-built (1) Owned by a documentation citizen (2) And operated by a crew of U.S. citizens (3) For purposes of owning a U.S.-flag vessel, an company must be organized in such a way that it qualifies as a documentation citizen (4) If it is organized as a U.S. corporation, a company must be at least seventy-five percent owned by U.S. citizens (5) Its chief executive officer and chairman of the board of directors must be U.S. citizens, and no more of its directors than a minority of the number necessary to constitute a quorum may be non-citizens

9 SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE JONES ACT (6) The corporate citizenship requirements apply to all levels of a company's organization, so the seventy-five percent ownership requirement applies to a parent corporation that has a subsidiary company operating the service (7) An operator that meets these citizenship requirements may own qualified U.S.-flag vessels that were built in a U.S. shipyard (8) And apply for a coastwise endorsement to be issued to the vessel by the United States Coast Guard (9) Any vessel engaged in transportation of passengers or merchandise between U.S. ports must be issued a coastwise endorsement (10) Thus, operators that wish to expand their fleet in order to accommodate increased demand for domestic marine transportation will be restricted to purchasing vessels constructed in U.S. shipyards.

11 PASSENGER VESSEL SERVICES ACT OF 1886 The Passenger Vessel Services Act of 1886 provides that a vessel may not transport passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, unless the vessel is a qualified US-flagged vessel. Regarding the US OCS, the CBP has also carefully limited the application of the Passenger Act consistent with OCSLA Section 4(a).

12 TOWING STATUTE OF 1940 The Towing Statute of 1940 provides that a US vessel must be used for towage between ports or places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port or place and from point to point within the harbors of ports or places to which the coastwise laws apply unless a vessel is in distress. The CBP has taken the position that the statute is to be construed consistently with the Jones Act so under this rational places in the United States to which the coastwise laws apply would also encompass points on the US OCS as defined in OCSLA.

13 DREDGING ACT OF 1906 The Dredging Act of 1906 restricts dredging, which includes certain pipe or cable laying activities as well as foundation excavations, in the navigable waters of the United States to qualified US-flagged vessels. The CBP has long-held that dredging... is the use of a vessel equipped with excavating machinery in digging up or otherwise removing submarine material. The CBP reasons that [w]ith respect to the applicability of [the Dredging Act] to the OCS, we [CBP] have held that statute to apply only to dredging on the OCS for the purposes described in Section 4 of the OCSLA, and not to dredging done to prepare the seabed of the OCS for the laying of trans-oceanic cable. The Dredging Act does not apply because dredging for a transoceanic cable on the US OCS was not within the purposes outlined in OCSLA Section 4(a). Analogously, dredging to lay or bury in the seabed the undersea cable infrastructure of an offshore wind farm would not implicate the Dredging Act.

14 U.S. MARITIME CABOTAGE LAWS The United States maritime cabotage laws apply to US territorial waters (navigable waters). The US territorial seas limit applicable to these laws is three nautical miles. These laws consist primarily of the Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act of 1920), the Passenger Vessel Services Act of 18863, the Dredging Act of 19064, and the Towing Statute of Outside of three nautical miles, the application of these laws likely limited because the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 19537, that extends certain federal laws to the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), appears likely restricted (OCSLA) to mining, gas and oil activities.

15 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Acts of 1953 (Amended 1978) Extend the jurisdiction of all federal laws to: the subsoil and seabed of the outer Continental Shelf and to all artificial islands, and all installations and other devices permanently or temporarily attached to the seabed, which may be erected thereon for the purpose of exploring for, developing, or producing resources therefrom[.] Limits federal laws and their application to certain types of installations and devices on the US OCS based on their function. The 1978 Amendments to OCSLA Section 4(a)(1) limit the application of federal law to those installations and devices erected thereon for the purpose of exploring for, developing, or producing resources therefrom, while extending United States maritime cabotage laws to artificial islands and fixed structures which may be erected thereon for the purpose of exploring for, developing, removing, and transporting resources therefrom[.] (the purpose requirement).

16 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Acts of 1953 (Amended 1978) Does not define the term resources but the Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf to which the United States is a party defines natural resources to consist of the mineral and other non-living resources of the seabed and subsoil together with the living organisms belonging to sedentary species [immobile or constantly in contact with the seabed]. The question remains to whether the OCSLA extension of US maritime cabotage laws is limited to the particular purposes of exploration, development, and production in an oil and gas context as enumerated in Section 4(a)(1) of the statute. In the Alliance case, the United States First Circuit Court of Appeals recently interpreted OCSLA Section 4(a)(1). The court found the language to be ambiguous and reviewed the legislative history underlying the 1953 original enactment and 1978 amendments, as well as looking at the governing law provision in Section 4(e). The court determined that Congress had intended to import the purpose requirement.

17 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Acts of 1953 (Amended 1978) The CBP, charged with enforcement of the Jones Act, has interpreted Section 4(a)(1) to apply to points on the US OCS used for the exploration, development, or production of seabed mineral resources. The consensus seems to support the view that the terms exploration, development and production apply exclusively to mineral activities in the seabed, and thus the Jones Act would not apply to a nonmineral resource such as offshore wind energy.

18 JONES ACT: EXCEPTIONS Even if the Jones Act does apply to offshore wind projects, both exceptions and waivers exist to avoid its application. Under the language of the Jones Act, the act of installing a wind tower is likely not be coastwise trade or transportation of merchandise between points. A recent CBP ruling speaks directly to this point, and concludes that in the context of a wind farm, CBP has long held that neither drilling nor pile driving, in and of itself, conducted by a stationary vessel, constitutes coastwise trade or coastwise transportation. See HQ , dated November 14, 1988 and HQ , dated November 28, 1990, respectively. The proposed activity with respect to the driving of a monopile foundation into the seabed is very similar to pile driving and is governed by the same principle. Therefore, we find that the activity of the stationary construction vessel described above, involving driving of a monopile foundation into the seabed and then adding a platform deck, anemometer tower, and other components does not constitute coastwise trade or coastwise transportation. In summary, we find that the engagement in the proposed activity will not result in a violation of 46 U.S.C

19 JONES ACT: EXCEPTIONS Based on this CBP ruling, a vessel used in monopole installation, and even the installation of the turbines themselves, does not constitute coastwise trade under the Jones Act. Foreign-flagged vessels and crews may be used for these activities (albeit the components installed would have to be transported by a US flag coastwise qualified vessel unless all such transportation can be arranged from a foreign port directly to the installation site with no US entry).

20 JONES ACT: WAIVER US maritime cabotage laws can be waived by the US government in certain limited circumstances, which could come into play if those laws were found to apply to offshore alternative energy projects, specifically On request of the Secretary of Defense, the head of an agency responsible for the administration of the navigation or vessel-inspection laws shall waive compliance with those laws to the extent the Secretary considers necessary in the interest of national defense. Indeed, the recent public debate surrounding the Administration s handling of waivers for foreign vessels used in oil spill response in the Deepwater Horizon spill demonstrates well the political minefield surrounding Jones Act waivers.

21 CBP RULINGS: REGARDING FOREIGN VESSELS & JACK-UPS A recent CBP ruling provides that foreign flagged jack-up vessels with foreign crews may be used for wind farm drilling, pile driving and installation activities as long as The vessel is stable and stationary, Does not transport persons to or from US ports, Ideally, the jack-up rig would arrive functional from a foreign country with a foreign crew without requiring any US modification ashore. A foreign-flagged vessel with foreign crew vessel entering US port and disembarking for modification would directly violate the ruling, so the foreign vessel should proceed directly to the project site to begin drilling, driving piles and installing the wind tower, and This recent ruling conforms to past offshore oil and gas CBP rulings that permit foreign vessels, that are non-coastwise qualified, to be used as a moored construction facility. The coastwise laws do not prohibit the use of a non- coastwise-qualified stationary platform or barge used for construction activities within or beyond the territorial waters of the United States.

22 APPLICATION OF JONES ACT REQUIREMENTS TO THE SEPARATE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE PHASES OF OFFSHORE WIND FARMS Initial Component Delivery The Jones Act does not apply to the transportation of merchandise from foreign ports to US ports. Components may be initially delivered to a US port by a foreign vessel. Component Transportation To An Offshore Wind Farm Site The Jones Act applies since this is the transportation of merchandise from a US port (a point) to another point, that point being a jack-up operating as a stationary, stable construction platform. If the component is moved by barge, the Towing Act will require that the tug utilized be a documented US flag tug. Installation and Assembly Phase Offshore drilling, pile-driving, and component installation are not considered coastwise trade or coastwise transportation under the Jones Act, so it does not apply in this phase. A foreign flag construction vessel (jack-up) that is stable and stationary may be used for this phase.

23 APPLICATION OF JONES ACT REQUIREMENTS TO THE SEPARATE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE PHASES OF OFFSHORE WIND FARMS Operation, Repair and Maintenance Phase The Jones Act would likely apply since the these activities would involve a vessel leaving from a US port (a point) and travelling to another point (the completed wind tower) with merchandise (repair components) and then returning to a US port (another point). Under the Jones Act, any vessel moving merchandise or passengers between a stationary platform and another coastwise point must be documented for the coastwise trade. Maintenance - Once the offshore wind farm is completed, the wind farm operator faces the problem of maintaining the turbines in terms of normal maintenance but possible repairs necessitated by natural forces or third parties such as a vessel collision with a wind turbine.

24 CLEAR ACT Consolidated Land, Energy and Aquatic Resources Act of 2010 Passed by House July 30, Requires any USL engaged in U.S. Offshore energy development, explanation, or production to be U.S. flagged, Use can be built overseas, it must be owned by a Jones Act Company, Redefines the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to Cover alternative energy in addition to oil and gas. Thus would apply to wind farms 200 miles offshore; and President Obama is in favor of bill McCain opposes

25 CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS NEXT WEEK There are vigorous debates between those interested in making the Jones Act more restrictive and others who want to relax or abolish the Act. For example the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure has proposed new safety and environmental regulations including a provision that vessels operating in the 200 NM US Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). In contrast, Senator McCain proposes a repeal of the Jones Act.

THE JONES ACT ONE MORE VARIABLE IN THE OFFSHORE WIND EQUATION By Douglas Burnett and Michael Hartman 1 Of the many pieces to the offshore wind puzzle for the United States, the Jones Act and other statutory

Working Document of the NPC Study: Arctic Potential: Realizing the Promise of U.S. Arctic Oil and Gas Resources Made Available March 27, 2015 Paper #7-5 OPERATIONAL LIMITATIONS DUE TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE

What Every Member of the Trade Community Should Know About: Coastwise Trade: Merchandise AN INFORMED COMPLIANCE PUBLICATION JANUARY 2009 NOTICE: This publication is intended to provide guidance and information

Page 1 Law of Ukraine on the exclusive (marine) economic zone of 16 May 1995 Taking into consideration the relevant provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Ukraine hereby

Page 1 The Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976, Act No. 80 of 28 May 1976 Short title and commencement 1. (1) This Act may be called the Territorial

Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy December 15, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov

CIL ICPC WORKSHOP ON THE PROTECTION OF SUBMARINE CABLES Singapore, 14-15 April 2011 Session 2 : Repairing Submarine Cables Best National Practices for the Repair of Submarine Cables Robert Beckman Director,

CABOTAGE REGULATIONS AND THE CHALLENGES OF OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES Wakil Oyeleru Oyedemi * I.INTRODUCTION... 608 II.MEANING AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF CABOTAGE IN THE

Admiralty Jurisdiction Act (No. 40 of 1983) AN ACT TO AMEND AND CONSOLIDATE THE LAW RELATING TO ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION, LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH SHIPS AND THE ARREST OF SHIPS AND OTHER PROPERTY

GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation U.S. Senate February 2004 MARITIME LAW EXEMPTION Exemption Provides Limited Competitive

The Fifth Circuit Attempts to Clarify the Interplay Between OCSLA and Maritime Law; Declines to Create a Zone of Danger Cause of Action Under General Maritime Law In Francis Barker v. Hercules Offshore,

U.S. Statutes Relating to Piracy 18 U.S.C. 2280. Violence against maritime navigation (a) Offenses.-- (1) In general.--a person who unlawfully and intentionally-- (A) seizes or exercises control over a

www.atlanticintracoastal.org The Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway is a continuous sheltered waterway used by commercial and private shallow draft vessels. The US Army Corps of Engineers maintains the Waterway

Wreck Removal Jhonnie Kern University of Gothenburg 13 October 2015 WRECK REMOVAL Swedish Law as an Example The Nairobi Convention Purposes of the Convention Scope of the Convention Definitions of Ship

Act of 1807 An Act to prohibit the importation of slaves into any port or place within the jurisdiction of the United States, from and after the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand

Please note: This text is from the fourth edition of Federal Historic Preservation Laws, published in 2006 by the National Center for Cultural Resources, National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

CROATIAN PARLIAMENT 3046 Pursuant to Article 88 of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, I hereby bring a DECISION PROMULGATING THE ACT ON MARITIME SHIP AND PORT SECURITY I hereby promulgate the

Testimony of Matthew Paxton President, Shipbuilders Council of America Before the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Examining the

PROTOCOL CONCERNING COOPERATION IN PREVENTING POLLUTION FROM SHIPS AND, IN CASES OF EMERGENCY, COMBATING POLLUTION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA The Contracting Parties to the present Protocol, Being Parties

Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 14206 Filed 02/19/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, on

123 STAT. 3409 Public Law 111 118 111th Congress An Act Making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate

TITLE 46, APPENDIX SHIPPING This Appendix consists of sections of former Title 46 that are not included in Title 46, Shipping, as enacted by Pub. L. 98 89, subtitle B of title V of Pub. L. 99 509, section

SYLLABUS FOR MARITIME PERSONAL INJURY AND DEATH Spring 2016 PROFFESSOR JOHN F. UNGER 1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES The objectives of this course are to teach the substantive law of the subject matter integrated

Text of the Jones Act Merchant Marine Act of 1920 From Title 46 of the U.S. Code SEC. 1. PURPOSE AND POLICY OF UNITED STATES (46 App. U.S.C. 861 (2002)). It is necessary for the national defense and for

8 Military Transactions In this section: Coverage and definitions Estimation methods overview U.S. receipts Transfers under U.S. military agency sales contracts U.S. payments Direct defense expenditures

II 4TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION S. 2 To repeal the crude oil export ban, and for other purposes. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES MAY 19, 2015 (for herself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. MANCHIN, and Mr. CORKER) introduced

FAQs for Detainees in Marine Pollution Prosecutions Under what authority may the Coast Guard board a vessel? Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, a coastal state has full and exclusive

ORDINANCE NO.: 2008-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF HERNANDO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CREATING A SECfION OF THE HERNANDO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE MOORING OR DOCKING OF COMMERCIAL VESSELS AS DEFINED; PROVIDING

Law No------/2015 Law on Coast Guard Art 1 Purpose The purpose of this law is to reestablish a Coast Guard for Somalia. For the purpose of this Law:. means. Art 2 Definitions Art 3 Applicability of Somali

FEDERAL RAILROAD SAFETY ACT OF 1970 1/ GENERAL This comprehensive law authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to prescribe regulations for all areas of railroad safety (supplementing existing rail safety

QUESTIONNAIRE ON INFORMATION ON PORT AND COASTAL STATE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO PRIVATELY CONTRACTED ARMED SECURITY PERSONNEL ON BOARD SHIPS (The present questionnaire should be read in conjunction with

BP OIL SPILL ON THE DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL RIG PESONS AND ENTITIES THAT MAY HAVE A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 1. Fishermen, oyster harvesters, shrimpers, or businesses involved in the processing and packaging for

ANNEX 8A SCHEDULE OF THE UNITED STATES Sector: Atomic Energy Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq. Investment A license issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission is required

H. R. 3360 One Hundred Eleventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten An Act

Customary International Law and the Law of the Sea in U.S. Courts Presentation to the NOAA Law of the Sea Convention Working Group (5/24/11) Michael Socarras McDermott Will & Emery LLP Washington, D.C.

Oregon Ballast Water Program Pacific Ballast Water Group Meeting February 2012 Seattle, WA Rian v. Hooff Department of Environmental Quality Portland, Oregon Oregon Ballast Water Program Program Overview

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF TIMOR-LESTE NATIONAL PARLIAMENT Law No. 7/2002 Of 20 September MARITIME BOUNDARIES OF THE TERRITORY OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF TIMOR-LESTE The Constitution of the Democratic Republic

Three Branches of Government The Executive Branch The President of the United States is the leader of the executive branch. The President s duties are to: Enforce federal laws and recommend new ones Serve

Charleston School of Law: Admiralty and Maritime Law LLM Program The Charleston School of Law in Charleston, South Carolina, will offer an advanced degree program in Admiralty and Maritime Law in the Fall