Boris Badenov, Natasha Fatale, and Fearless Leader were cartoon representations of Russian spies in the Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoon (1959-1964). Any resemblance between comic cartoons and current political rhetoric is purely intentional.

When I read “election hacking,” I think of hacking voting machines or state election sites or voter registration lists. That’s not what happened here. Not even close.

The “Russian election hacking” story isn’t about hacking elections at all. It is about somebody hacking the email accounts of Democratic Party officials and then making those emails public. That might be revealing private information, but it is not hacking an election. In its first paragraph, the New York Times backs off from the headline, referring instead to “efforts to influence the 2016 election.”

There is NO evidence of hacking the election itself – ballots, votes, systems. The only alleged evidence is about hacking email accounts of political party officials – not even government officials.

The FBI director tried to influence the election. President Obama tried to influence the election. Political parties, candidates, elected officials and individual citizens tried to influence the election. EVERYBODY tried to influence the election. Did Russians or Vladimir Putin or the Russian government also try?

Official stories make much of the fact that the FBI and CIA agree that Russia tried to help Trump. They don’t say how. They say that’s classified information. So instead of actual evidence, we are left with “trust us” kinds of allegations by U.S. government officials and U.S. intelligence agencies.

One NBC story that tags Putin as the man behind the “U.S. Election Hack,” cites as its sources: “U.S. intelligence officials.” “Senior U.S. intelligence officials.” “Two senior officials with direct access to the information.” “A high-level intelligence source.” “The intelligence officials.” “American officials.” “A former CIA official who worked on Russia.” “A currently serving U.S. intelligence official.” The story notes that the United States has 17 intelligence agencies. The only person named as a source is a former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, who says he finds the story “consistent with the Putin I have watched,” but has no direct evidence of anything. So we have a major, mainstream media story, repeating the inaccurate “election hack” tag, and offering only anonymous sources to back its allegations.

“The problem with this story is that, like the Iraq-WMD mess, it takes place in the middle of a highly politicized environment during which the motives of all the relevant actors are suspect. Nothing quite adds up.”

We don’t know who the email hackers are. The most geeky, authoritative-sounding stories toss around names like APT28, APT29, CozyBear, Grizzly Steppe, and X-Agent. None of the stories tells us who the email hackers are. Some claim that the “intelligence agencies” have identified Russian software that was used. Although, as cybersecurity expert Jeffrey Carr pointed out back in June, even Russian software doesn’t mean Russian responsibility:

“In the physical world of crime investigation, common sense dictates that the perpetrator of a crime may use any weapon and not just one made in the country of his birth, and that the developer or manufacturer of the weapon most likely isn’t the criminal.”

Maybe Russian nationals stole the DNC emails. Even that would not necessarily make it a government operation. Maybe Vladimir Putin directed or approved of the theft. He’s an authoritarian, self-aggrandizing, misogynisticmegalomaniac. That might make it a Russian government operation. Or not. He might just want to lend a helping hand to Trump, a man he can understand. Or Putin might want to get back at Hillary Clinton, an old enemy.

“There is strong evidence indicating that Democratic email accounts were breached via phishing messages, and that specific malware was spread across DNC computers. There’s even evidence that the attackers are the same group that’s been spotted attacking other targets in the past. But again: No one has actually proven that group is the Russian government (or works for it).”

Because of Putin’s political positions and because of Russia’s older, better-documented trolling operation, I think it’s likely that Putin/the Russian government actually are behind the email shenanigans. Many factors contributed to Clinton’s defeat. A single, silver-bullet explanation is just wrong, attractive as demonizing Russians may seem to some.

Question #4: What difference does it make?

If the Russian government tried to influence U.S. presidential election, how serious is that? We do the same damn thing, year after year in country after country.

Go back to 1948 – the CIA delivered millions of dollars, literal suitcases full of cash, to influence the Italian elections. It succeeded, and continued to meddle in (“influence”) those elections for 24 years, as the very CIA officials who were involved proudly proclaimed in the 1990s.

These are just two examples in a long history of U.S. intervention in elections in other countries, which still continues today. So, if the CIA says the Russian government tried to influence U.S. elections, maybe they know what they are talking about. The CIA pretty much wrote the book on intervening in foreign elections.

Does that make it okay for Russians to try to influence the U.S. presidential election? Ariel Dorfman, a Chilean during the time the U.S. subverted their electoral process, is now a U.S. citizen. He writes:

“I can savor the irony, but I feel no glee. This is not only because, as an American citizen myself now, I am once again a victim of this sort of nefarious meddling. My dismay goes deeper than that personal sense of vulnerability. This is a collective disaster: Those who vote in the United States should not have to suffer what those of us who voted in Chile had to go through. Nothing warrants that citizens anywhere should have their destiny manipulated by forces outside the land they inhabit.”

So, yes. “Nefarious meddling” in another country’s elections is a big deal – just a different kind of big deal than the “Russian hacking” headlines suggest. And the biggest danger may not be the impact on elections, but the overall impact of trolling, disinformation, and propaganda to promote “an atmosphere of uncertainty and paranoia, heightening divisions” within U.S. civil society.

Lessons for news consumers:

What can we learn from the bad headlines and sketchy coverage of this story? Lots more than I have space to discuss here, but I hope that if you have read this far, you will take away three important lessons:

1) Read the whole story, not just the headline. Read carefully, even suspiciously.

Follow News Day via Email

News Day

Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provides health care for 9 million children and 375,000 pregnant women in working families who make too much money to qualify for Medicaid, but not enough for private insurance. Working families like Bob Cratchit’s family. You remember Bob Cratchit. He worked for old Ebenezer Scrooge, and he didn’t make much […]

Old Scrooge, before he repented, thought the poor and disabled might as well die and reduce the surplus population. He would have loved this tax bill, which is likely to reduce the surplus population by, among other things, reducing access to chemotherapy for Medicare patients with cancer. The tax bill also eliminates tax deductions for […]

If you are confused about the “tax cut” bill, you are not alone. I took two semesters of tax law way back in the day, and I do my own taxes every year, so here’s my explanation of just one of the ways the “tax reform” cuts taxes but actually leaves you paying more.

Want to open the faucet and see brown, gritty, unsafe water? Move to St. Joseph, Louisiana, where the town’s water system is irreparably fouled by decades of neglect. The impoverished town is not alone, according to the Center for Investigative Reporting: “St. Joseph, population 1,029, is one of thousands of small towns across the country […]

UPDATE WITH CORRECTION 10/6/17 – see below: Yom Kippur is a day of fasting and repentance. It is a day to reflect on what we have done wrong in the past year, and to ask forgiveness. Unless you are the president of the United States. Then it is a day to attack anyone who dares […]