Shulem, accept my comfortings and you will have peace and contentment.

Don't give me that monkey business you little weasel. Put your money where your mouth is. Tell me the name of the king written in the writing of Facsimile No. 3 and prove to me that your so-called translations and revelations which you gave to Joseph Smith (published in LDS canon) are true.

Now is your big day to prove you know a little something, Spook. If you can't give me the name of the king, then shut the hell up before I slap your spooky face.

Why do you only take credit for the good outcomes but not the bad outcomes? There was a definite breakdown between you and Brigham Young with respect to mountain meadows and the priesthood ban. What happened there? Also, the scriptures you supposedly inspire are confusing and contradictory. Is there a problem with how you communicate? Maybe feeling you isn't the best way to tell your supposed servants what they should be doing or communicating scripture? I think BY thought he was correct to murder all those poor souls at mountain meadows and I know he thought the priesthood ban was the right thing to do. Hell, Oaks thinks you inspired it. These and other missteps like excluding kids of lgtb parents leaves a lot to explain. So, what gives Ghost?

_________________"Religion is about providing human community in the guise of solving problems that don’t exist or failing to solve problems that do and seeking to reconcile these contradictions and conceal the failures in bogus explanations otherwise known as theology." - Kishkumen

On behalf of a close friend I would like to extend my thanks for your influence in her life. She is one of the most spiritual people I know, whose daily life has been guided by your voice. She has received strong confirmation from you that she should marry each of her 4 husbands and also that she should divorce them all. Through your grace she has let all of her estranged 5 children know that the church is the most important thing in her life. Truly by listening to you she made her life what it is today. She can take comfort in the fact that for all of eternity, thanks to you, her family of 1 will be forever.

_________________"The lives we lead now are not dress rehearsals, they are the only performance we have. Therefore what matters is what we have here, the people we know and and love and the good we can do for the world"Sean Carroll

Shulem, accept my comfortings and you will have peace and contentment.

Don't give me that monkey business you little weasel. Put your money where your mouth is. Tell me the name of the king written in the writing of Facsimile No. 3 and prove to me that your so-called translations and revelations which you gave to Joseph Smith (published in LDS canon) are true.

Now is your big day to prove you know a little something, Spook. If you can't give me the name of the king, then shut the hell up before I slap your spooky face.

Oh that I could have the body of even a little weasel.

Did you ever feel a prompting that you thought was from Me about the name of the king written in Facsimile No. 3? Please describe any feelings you had about it.

Why do you only take credit for the good outcomes but not the bad outcomes? There was a definite breakdown between you and Brigham Young with respect to mountain meadows and the priesthood ban. What happened there? Also, the scriptures you supposedly inspire are confusing and contradictory. Is there a problem with how you communicate? Maybe feeling you isn't the best way to tell your supposed servants what they should be doing or communicating scripture? I think BY thought he was correct to murder all those poor souls at mountain meadows and I know he thought the priesthood ban was the right thing to do. Hell, Oaks thinks you inspired it. These and other missteps like excluding kids of lgtb parents leaves a lot to explain. So, what gives Ghost?

Oh, please don't let Me be misunderstood. That's My motto, because so often people misattribute to Me their own feelings. Then, there can be bad outcomes. Sometimes, there must be some misunderstanding. As to Mountain Meadows, why are you so sure that the Fancher Party had not mocked and teased a prophet? Could have been she-bears, but John D. Lee and others were used nicely. Good outcome. The priesthood ban was inspired, it was about those fence-sitters in the pre-existence War in Heaven. Pretty obvious, right? There is a bit of problem in how I communicate. Imagine how much Joseph would have gotten wrong with the Book of Mormon if Elohim hadn't allowed the use of the stone and actual English words to appear on it. Elohim wants you all to get in touch with your inner person, so He just allows Me to give you feelings. You also are equipped with conciences to know which feelings are inspired by me. Those are the ones that lead you to do the best for your fellow mankind. Excluding the kids of lgtb parents is wrong. Seems Presidents Nelson and Oaks misunderstood that one. I try to inspire them to be kind and benevolent, but they are both pretty hard headed.

How do we solve hunger and stop these wars that are going on in the world (syria and yemen come to mind)? Guide us wise one, we beg thee.

Also, have you inspired Oaks and Nelson to read this thread, yet? If so, Oaks and Nelson, wtf with the banning of kids with lgtb parents? You need to change that immediately and apologize for your gross error.

_________________"Religion is about providing human community in the guise of solving problems that don’t exist or failing to solve problems that do and seeking to reconcile these contradictions and conceal the failures in bogus explanations otherwise known as theology." - Kishkumen

On behalf of a close friend I would like to extend my thanks for your influence in her life. She is one of the most spiritual people I know, whose daily life has been guided by your voice. She has received strong confirmation from you that she should marry each of her 4 husbands and also that she should divorce them all. Through your grace she has let all of her estranged 5 children know that the church is the most important thing in her life. Truly by listening to you she made her life what it is today. She can take comfort in the fact that for all of eternity, thanks to you, her family of 1 will be forever.

So she acted on how she felt, and I'm to blame because she ascribed her feelings to Me?

Why do you only take credit for the good outcomes but not the bad outcomes? There was a definite breakdown between you and Brigham Young with respect to mountain meadows and the priesthood ban. What happened there? Also, the scriptures you supposedly inspire are confusing and contradictory. Is there a problem with how you communicate? Maybe feeling you isn't the best way to tell your supposed servants what they should be doing or communicating scripture? I think BY thought he was correct to murder all those poor souls at mountain meadows and I know he thought the priesthood ban was the right thing to do. Hell, Oaks thinks you inspired it. These and other missteps like excluding kids of lgtb parents leaves a lot to explain. So, what gives Ghost?

Oh, please don't let Me be misunderstood. That's My motto, because so often people misattribute to Me their own feelings. Then, there can be bad outcomes. Sometimes, there must be some misunderstanding. As to Mountain Meadows, why are you so sure that the Fancher Party had not mocked and teased a prophet? Could have been she-bears, but John D. Lee and others were used nicely. Good outcome. The priesthood ban was inspired, it was about those fence-sitters in the pre-existence War in Heaven. Pretty obvious, right? There is a bit of problem in how I communicate. Imagine how much Joseph would have gotten wrong with the Book of Mormon if Elohim hadn't allowed the use of the stone and actual English words to appear on it. Elohim wants you all to get in touch with your inner person, so He just allows Me to give you feelings. You also are equipped with conciences to know which feelings are inspired by me. Those are the ones that lead you to do the best for your fellow mankind. Excluding the kids of lgtb parents is wrong. Seems Presidents Nelson and Oaks misunderstood that one. I try to inspire them to be kind and benevolent, but they are both pretty hard headed.

Don't you think it's great that here, in this thread, I can use words for the first time? Not just give you confirming feelings?

On behalf of a close friend I would like to extend my thanks for your influence in her life. She is one of the most spiritual people I know, whose daily life has been guided by your voice. She has received strong confirmation from you that she should marry each of her 4 husbands and also that she should divorce them all. Through your grace she has let all of her estranged 5 children know that the church is the most important thing in her life. Truly by listening to you she made her life what it is today. She can take comfort in the fact that for all of eternity, thanks to you, her family of 1 will be forever.

So she acted on how she felt, and I'm to blame because she ascribed her feelings to Me?

Are you saying she is unable to distinguish between her own feelings and your promptings?

This is the most spiritual person I know. I may have to rethink how accurate such claim are if she is unable to distinguish the difference. I mean, what is a sinner like me supposed to do if a saint like this lady cannot tell the difference?

_________________"The lives we lead now are not dress rehearsals, they are the only performance we have. Therefore what matters is what we have here, the people we know and and love and the good we can do for the world"Sean Carroll

How do we solve hunger and stop these wars that are going on in the world (syria and yemen come to mind)? Guide us wise one, we beg thee.

Also, have you inspired Oaks and Nelson to read this thread, yet? If so, Oaks and Nelson, wtf with the banning of kids with lgtb parents? You need to change that immediately and apologize for your gross error.

If you will think of a solution to hunger and wars, study it out in your mind, earnestly pray about, I will warm your bosom, give you the still small voice assurance if your solution is righteous.

With Oaks and Nelson, they each have rebuffed my promptings repeatedly. It's not my gross error, but their stubbornness that is problematic. Those two exemplify the problem, as Joseph F. Smith told the U.S. Senate, of the Quorum of the Twelve being self-perpetuating ever since first re-constituted in 1835 with my inspiration.