THE CHURCH MILITANT
Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse.

Translate

Saturday, January 28, 2017

TRUMP JOINS ANTI-BREXIT THERESA MAY, UK PRIME MINISTER, FOR PRESS CONFERENCE~SWEARING IN OF JAMES MATTIS AS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

TRUMP JOINS ANTI-BREXIT THERESA MAY, UK PRIME MINISTER, FOR PRESS CONFERENCE~SWEARING IN OF JAMES MATTIS AS SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

This will make for an interesting conversation between this self-righteous destroyer of her own nation and President Trump.Theresa May recently boasted about having banned me from the country, and likened me to violent jihad terrorists. I was actually banned
for noting, quite correctly, that “[Islam] is a religion and is a
belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers…” That is what
May thinks is the flip side of jihad terrorism. Meanwhile, May’s Britain
has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a
moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred
and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in
Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain. The UK Home Office recently admitted
Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has
said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things.
One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest.
Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth –
tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination
of the above.” May’s government also recently admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Meanwhile, it banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.
What does Theresa May think is going to be the outcome of all this?
Does she think that by admitting jihad preachers such as Syed Muzaffar
Shah Qadri and jihad terrorists such as Jamshid Piruz
into the U.K., while banning foes of jihad terror, she will pacify her
restive and growing Muslim population, and obviate the jihad imperative?
Does she really believe that if “Islamophobia” is stamped out, Muslims
will see no need to respond with jihad?
Imagine how surprised she will be when she has managed to silence
every last critic of Islam and jihad, and jihad will still rear its
bloody head in her green and pleasant land. But it boggles the mind to
think she could be this stupid in the first place. Is there no one in
the British government with sufficient knowledge and courage to take the
Prime Minister aside and explain to her that jihad violence arises from
imperatives within Islam itself, which will not be blunted, calmed, or
discarded in the face of kindness from infidels?
“Britain’s Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalism Good, Climate Change a Priority,” by Raheem Kassam, Breitbart, January 26, 2017:

British Prime Minister Theresa May used her speech in
Philadelphia to needle the new Trump administration on a number of
issues ranging from globalism to climate change, Islam, and even to
defending the European Union.
Mrs. May began her speech at the Republican Retreat in Philadelphia
with a brief history of Anglo-American relations, invoking the spirit of
the Founding Fathers of the U.S. as well as expressing gratitude
towards America’s involvement in the World Wars of the 20th century.
But her speech was also littered with politically correct terms, as
well as left and center-left talking points regarding international
institutions, Islam, and radical Islamic terrorism, the latter of which
she called “Islamist extremism”.The British premier compared “open, liberal and democratic” societies
in the West versus “closed, coercive” ones. She hailed the United
Nations, praised the World Bank, and called NATO “the cornerstone” of
Western defense.
And Mrs. May also spoke of the necessity for multilateralism in stark
contrast with the line pushed by the White House — which prefers
bilateralism — over recent days. She cited the need to tackle “climate
change” as one of the reasons to back globalist institutions.
She called for the two nations to be “internationalist” and “global”,
though noted “Some of these organisations are in need of reform and
renewal”.
And while committing to the destruction of the Islamic State, she
failed to mention the name of the group, choosing instead the term
“Daesh” — a word preferred by politically correct types and most notably popularized by former Secretary of State John Kerry and President Barack Obama.
She went on to describe “radical Islamists”, stopping short of
echoing the phrases used by the new U.S. administration including
“radical Islamic terrorism”.
The British PM stated: “Of course we should always be careful to
distinguish between this extreme and hateful ideology and the peaceful
religion of Islam, and the hundreds of millions of its adherents,
including millions of our own citizens, and those further afield who are
so often the first victims of this ideology’s terror”….Curiously, despite Britain’s Brexit vote, Mrs. May said of the
European Union: “We will build a new partnership with our friends in
Europe. We are not turning our back on them, or on the interests and the
values that we share. It remains overwhelmingly in our interests – and
in those of the wider world – that the EU should succeed”.

Clearly, she is abandoning Brexit, which is no surprise at all. It
remains to be seen whether there are enough free Britons to cast her out
of office and install a Prime Minister who will make Brexit a reality.__________________________________________________

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

USA –-(Ammoland.com)- It’s good to be back and I’m grateful to serve alongside you as Secretary of Defense.
Together with the Intelligence Community we are the sentinels and guardians of our nation.
We
need only look to you, the uniformed and civilian members of the
Department and your families, to see the fundamental unity of our
country.

You represent an America committed to the common good;
an America that is never complacent about defending its freedoms; and an
America that remains a steady beacon of hope for all mankind.

Every
action we take will be designed to ensure our military is ready to
fight today and in the future. Recognizing that no nation is secure
without friends, we will work with the State Department to strengthen
our alliances.
Further, we are devoted to gaining full value from
every taxpayer dollar spent on defense, thereby earning the trust of
Congress and the American people.

I am confident you will do your part. I pledge to you I’ll do my best as your Secretary.

PAYPAL.ME-SUPPORT THIS BLOG

INFOWARS: THE FOURTH ESTATE, NOT STAR WARS

Adolf Hitler

ACTS 5:29

“Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.”

GEORGE WASHINGTON:

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.

THOMAS JEFFERSON 1800

"I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

GOD ABOVE GOVERNMENT

Bible Obedience; Civil Disobedience

DISCLAIMER

Disclaimer: We are not responsible for all views posted on this website. Authors of articles, videos and/or selected texts are solely responsible for the content of their material. Linked material is the responsibility of the party who created it. Those sharing stories or testimonies are responsible for the content of comments. The opinions expressed in articles, linked materials, and comments are not necessarily those of www.ratherexposethem.blogspot.com and/or its author.Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Total Pageviews

Content in full or in part may be copyrighted.. Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger.