When the Packers cut B.J. Coleman, the only backup quarterback on their 53-man roster, we wondered who Aaron Rodgers‘ backup would be. It didn’t take long to find out the answer: Seneca Wallace.

Wallace signed with the Packers today, Ed Werder of ESPN reports.

Pretty eventful preseason for a guy who is unlikely to play a single down throughout the year. I don't get the love of Seneca Wallace while a guy like Brian Hoyer can't get any love as a potential back up quarterback._________________

A small stone may only make a small ripple at first, but someday it will be a wave.

I can't imagine him being very good, so with that said, I approve of this move by Green Bay.

Seriously, if he was any good, why would NO and SF have cut him already?

Same reason Cassell was signed by Minny. Or why Orton was signed by Dallas. Or why Indy signed Hasselbeck. They are all guys that were cut. Does that make them bad? No, of course not. They are all guys that can't start in this league but if needed, can get you through a couple games should the starter go down._________________
El ramster on the custom sig!

I can't imagine him being very good, so with that said, I approve of this move by Green Bay.

Seriously, if he was any good, why would NO and SF have cut him already?

Maybe because he doesn't fit the system? There could be a multitude of reasons. Why does any team pick up any player that is cut is what your logic is saying.

I was trying to be more direct to Wallace. It didn't appear that way. My bad.

No, what I was saying was as a 3rd string (now 2nd string QB), you'd think Wallace would be able to pick up a system given he was probably asked to play as an "option QB" in practice for both squads, which is a college type offense. If thats the case, it really shouldn't be that hard to pick up.

There are a multitude of reasons. My guess though is he's just not that good and Green Bay desperately needed someone else (allthough personally I don't believe they should have cut Vince Young).

oh, and just to add, it appears Green Bay really isn't that great for developing QBs if Brohm, Harrell, Daniels and Young haven't worked out recently. They only two to have success have been Matt Flynn and Aaron Rodgers._________________

I can't imagine him being very good, so with that said, I approve of this move by Green Bay.

Seriously, if he was any good, why would NO and SF have cut him already?

Maybe because he doesn't fit the system? There could be a multitude of reasons. Why does any team pick up any player that is cut is what your logic is saying.

I was trying to be more direct to Wallace. It didn't appear that way. My bad.

No, what I was saying was as a 3rd string (now 2nd string QB), you'd think Wallace would be able to pick up a system given he was probably asked to play as an "option QB" in practice for both squads, which is a college type offense. If thats the case, it really shouldn't be that hard to pick up.

There are a multitude of reasons. My guess though is he's just not that good and Green Bay desperately needed someone else (allthough personally I don't believe they should have cut Vince Young).

oh, and just to add, it appears Green Bay really isn't that great for developing QBs if Brohm, Harrell, Daniels and Young haven't worked out recently. They only two to have success have been Matt Flynn and Aaron Rodgers.

Only you would find a way to bash the Packers and continue to disrespect the best QB in the league by spelling his name like a girl in a thread about our back up QB.

Grow up. Really. That hating crap and purposely spelling Aaron's name wrong is no different then calling the Vikings the Vi-Queens. It's childish and unnecessary. If you can't put your big boy pants on and discuss stuff like an adult about a rival, then don't click the thread._________________
El ramster on the custom sig!