Socionics Beta types Examples

I thought there could be a place to post videos of people who are beta. This could be an open thread which constantly gets bumped up when someone finds something relevant. I'll start with a video that gives me strong ESTp vibes:

Dreamy, yes. Lovers of romances, perhaps. Not gushy, especially at first sight. One thing that other INFps have in common is that I can feel them close the emotional distance when I'm talking to them -- adapting to the person speaking, drawing nearer. Which is what Audrey Hepburn (who's exactly like a bubbly INFp I know) does. Kristin Kreuk is very extraverted in comparison, though?

oh wow! Chris Langan! Definitely ISTj. Hahahaa... Listen to how he would rule the world. It's in the beginning (minutes 1-3) of "Chris Langan part3":
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=QA0gjyXG5O0[/youtube]

Wow, he fascinates me.. I couldn't stop watching lol. I love how he pauses after he's done speaking and just stares at the camera

I recommend checking out his extremely fascinating theory, CTMU. But be warned: it's heavy on the Ti.

edit: about the staring thing, the director of the show (Errol Morris) uses a technique where the subjects see his face projected on the camera lens, and vice versa, so he's actually looking at the director.

oh wow! Chris Langan! Definitely ISTj. Hahahaa... Listen to how he would rule the world. It's in the beginning (minutes 1-3) of "Chris Langan part3":
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=QA0gjyXG5O0[/youtube]

Wow, he fascinates me.. I couldn't stop watching lol. I love how he pauses after he's done speaking and just stares at the camera

I recommend checking out his extremely fascinating theory, CTMU. But be warned: it's heavy on the Ti.

edit: about the staring thing, the director of the show (Errol Morris) uses a technique where the subjects see his face projected on the camera lens, and vice versa, so he's actually looking at the director.

I agree the theory is very fascinating, even if kind of out of, well, mind?

Mika really reminds me of myself I feel kinda sorry for him ever since I saw that horrid interview with that woman in his type thread .. plus this interview even seems a little awkward - they're not really responding as well to his attempts at making the atmosphere a certain way ... sometimes I try and do that and I get the same reaction. The way he speaks and explains things is similar to me too .. and the bashfulness especially ... following a no reaction from , I start to feel very awkward and I look down and stuff... I see him doing that.

Chris Langan might be really smart but his theory is kinda silly. He makes a big deal out of the simple fact that an object cannot be defined externally in terms that were meant to describe its inner workings. It's just like how you can't speak meaningfully about a person, whether you mean to describe his/her personality or just external features, by talking about the number of mitochondria in his liver cells. It's impossible to "see the universe" from an external perspective, within the context of anything other than its own contents, so why bother trying to conceptualize or compartmentalize it? It's just an ego yawn for him, I'm sure.

But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...

Here's another example. You can talk all day long about how a TV works to produce colored light that it projects on crystals and yadda yadda yadda, but no matter how much information you gather about how the picture is created and what it may or may not look like from what we know about the internal processes of the TV, you'll never know what's on the screen until you can press the power button and watch. We will never step back and look at the universe from outside of "it," so we will never get the perspective that Langan is trying to imitate.

But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...

On the Enver Hoxha video, I know it's boring for those who don't understand Albanian (ie nearly everyone, including myself).

But take a look at it -- it's "regimental", collective Fe dual-seeking at its most nightmarish (to me). Hoxha is droning on and on, with a very serious face, but now and then all the audience stands up and aplauds enthusiastically. Hoxha does not show any emotion, he just sucks it from the audience. This is repeated a few times.

In the end, however, as he leaves the auditorium, he displays some Fe himself with individuals (and helping to explain how he managed to climb to power in his early days).

I disagree. His body language is IJ>EP. He's calm and static, quite rigid. Calm and deeply in his own world. He barely even makes eye contact. And he looks amazingly similar to James Hetfield and one ISTj professor in my university. Not so much physically, but the facial expressions are very similar.

this is what i'm curious about at the moment. i've tried self-typing myself and i haven't really come to a conclusion. tests type me as IEE every time, but i still find myself identifying with IEI and EIE types in addition to IEE, and i LOVELOVELOVELOVELOVE "beta" music. radiohead, bright eyes, ect. is preferred music really type-related? part of me thinks that different types from different quadras could all like the same music, but the reasons why they enjoy the music would be different.

oh. and first post on this forum. been lurkin for a while possible male NF here.

does anyone have a clue on bruce springsteen's type? my guess is LSI or SLE.