Thursday, February 21, 2019

Trump
Administration Seeks Legalization of Homosexuality Around the World While
Children and Other Victims of Homosexuality Are Forgotten

By Julio
Severo

U.S. conservatives were shocked when they
read headlines this week announcing that the U.S. government is spearheading an
effort to decriminalize homosexuality around the world. This is a concern especially
for the main base of Trump: evangelicals.

“The
Trump administration’s highest profile gay person is leading an effort to
decriminalize homosexuality in dozens of nations where it’s still illegal.”

U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell,
who is a prominent homosexual activist in the Republican Party and in the Trump
administration, was chosen by Trump to lead the decriminalization push. Grenell
is married to a homosexual man and he has been fighting for homosexual
privileges, including gay “marriage.”

Even though, in this phase, the U.S. government
has said that the push involves no fight for gay “marriage,” the tone that the
U.S. State Department has been giving to the homosexual agenda is very
worrying.

WND said,

“Secretary
of State Mike Pompeo, an evangelical Christian, is supporting the diplomatic
effort to fight violence and discrimination against LGBT people, NBC said,
citing U.S. officials. Pompeo declared in his Senate confirmation hearing: ‘I
deeply believe that LGBTQ persons have every right that every other person in
the world would have.’”

By saying that homosexuals have every
right that every other person has, Pompeo betrayed the real intent of the Trump
administration, because if every person has a right to marriage and adoption of
children, Pompeo’s declaration suggested that every homosexual has a right to
marriage and adoption of children too. It is, as he said himself, his deep
conviction.

Such push coming from the Trump administration
is a shame. Coming from an evangelical who is the State Secretary, helping
homosexual activist Grenell, is a bigger shame, because he is doing exactly
what left-wing Protestant Hillary Clinton was doing when she was also a State
Secretary.

On the homosexual issue, the Trump
administration is misrepresenting U.S. conservatives.

On the homosexual issue, “evangelical” Pompeo
is misrepresenting U.S. evangelicals.

Even if the push of the Trump
administration addressed only violence against homosexuals, why prioritize
individuals known for their bad sexual choices?

When I think about violence and homosexuality,
the first thought coming to my mind is not individuals suffering violence for
their sexual lifestyle. The first thinking is children suffering homosexual
violence — physical and psychological. There is a massive effort to cover up
the suffering of children in the hands of homosexual predators.

The Catholic Church is a
living evidence of the gravity of homosexual violence against children. Young
men with hidden homosexual problems enter Catholic seminaries, and even though
they are never delivered from their homosexual demons and vices, they become
priests and bishops. The natural consequence is that their homosexuality eventually
produces sexual violence against children.

If you cannot hinder even a Christian setting
where there is homosexuality from committing sexual violence against children, how
does the U.S. government expect to protect a homosexual culture known for
making children especially vulnerable to sexual abuse?

I have no doubt that George Washington,
the first U.S. president known
for discharging dishonorably a soldier because of his homosexual behavior,
would never accept a “LGBTI Pride Month” in the State Department. Instead, he
would launch a “Month of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda
and Violence.” He would also launch a push to encourage nations to protect
children and teens from homosexual propaganda and its psychological and
physical violence.

Putin’s Russia has given a very good
example by enacting in 2013 a law banning homosexual propaganda to children.
The Obama administration, which was busy celebrating homosexuality in its State
Department and engaged in efforts to decriminalize homosexuality around the
world, growled at the Russian law and used the Ukrainian issue as a pretext to
impose sanctions on Russia.

With Trump, my expectation was that he
would use the U.S. government to do much more than Russia against the powerful homosexual
agenda and its predatory threat to children. Yet, in many ways and year after
year Trump, his administration and his State Department are doing more and more
to imitate Obama and his obsession to celebrate homosexuality.

Obama never was worried about children and
their protection against the predatory threat of homosexual propaganda. Trump
and “evangelical” Pompeo never showed any such worry too. No “Month of
Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence.”

All of them are interested in protecting a
predatory sexual behavior that brought God’s judgment to Sodom as an example of
societies that would choose homosexuality as their official lifestyle. The
U.S., under Obama and Trump, are not only celebrating and protecting this
perverted lifestyle, but the Obama administration worked and the Trump
administration has been working to spread the celebration and protection of
this lifestyle that even today is bringing big curses to the Catholic Church
and eventually bring bigger curses and destruction to societies that insist on
embracing what God has always condemned.

God
has said,

“You shall not lie with a male as
with a woman; it is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22 ESV)

“What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah
and the cities near them is an example for us of the punishment of eternal fire.
The people of these cities suffered the same fate that God’s people and the
angels did, because they committed sexual sins and engaged in homosexual
activities.” (Jude 1:7 GWV)

May evangelicals who elected Trump pray
for him to stop imitating Obama. And may they ask him to oust homosexual activist
Richard Grenell from his administration and “evangelical” Mike Pompeo from his
State Department and appoint evangelicals who may be able to celebrate a “Month
of Protection of Children Against Homosexual Propaganda and Violence” in the
State Department and launch an international push with such good example.

Conservatives and evangelicals, in the
U.S. and around the world, expect no less than this from America.

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

The Bolsonaro administration in Brazil
wants to restrain, according to Brazilian newspaper Estadão, what it considers
the opposition of the Catholic Church, in the vacuum of the defeat and loss of
the Workers’ Party and other left-wing parties. In the evaluation of officials
of President Jair Bolsonaro, the Catholic Church is a traditional ally of the
Workers’ Party (WP) and it is articulating itself to influence debates
previously dominated by WP in the countryside of Brazil and in suburbs.

The alert to the Bolsonaro administration
came from reports of the Brazilian Intelligence Agency (Abin) and military
leaders. These reports have mentioned recent meetings of Brazilian cardinals
with Pope Francis in the Vatican.

“We are worried and we want to neutralize
it,” said Augusto Heleno, chief minister of the Institutional Security Office
(ISO), who heads the counter-offensive.

Based on documents circulating within the
Bolsonaro administration, the ISO’s military officials have judged that
left-leaning sectors of the Catholic Church, members of the so-called
“progressive clergy,” intend to take advantage of meetings with the pope to
criticize the Bolsonaro administration and get international impact.

“We think this is interference in Brazil’s
internal affairs,” said Heleno. As a reaction, ISO plans to involve, according
to Estadão, the Itamaraty [the Brazilian foreign affair ministry], which is
under the control of an olavete, to monitor Brazilian Catholic leaders during
their trips to the Vatican.

As soon as Abin’s first communication
reached the top officials of the Bolsonaro administration, generals immediately
made a connection with the criticism of the National Conference of Brazilian
Bishops (NCBB) to Bolsonaro during the election campaign. Groups linked to the
NCBB, such as the Indigenous Missionary Council and the Land Pastoral
Commission, spared no attacks, which continued after Bolsonaro’s election and
inauguration. All of them are historical allies of the Workers’ Party. The
Prison Pastoral, for example, issued a press release last week criticizing the
anticrime measures of the Minister of Justice, Sérgio Moro, who, as judge,
condemned former president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in the Car Washing
operation.

In the electoral campaign, Land Pastoral
issued a report by Bishop André de Witte of Bahia, who mentioned Bolsonaro as a
“real danger.” Bolsonaro’s support networks countered by spreading on the
internet that Pope Francisco was “communist.”

Although considering himself Catholic,
Bolsonaro was unable to obtain the support of the NCBB, which is Brazil’s
largest Catholic force, but invested heavily and incessantly in the support of
evangelicals, especially Rev. Silas Malafaia, during the elections.

However, after getting elected, he
abandoned his preference for evangelicals and opted for placing above
evangelicals militant olavetes, as adherents of astrologer Olavo de Carvalho
are called. Because of this change of preference, several ministries of great
importance became a source of jobs to olavetes, just as in the past they were a
source of jobs to socialist militants.

The only evangelical in high level in the
Bolsonaro administration is Pastor Damares Alves, who heads the Ministry of
Women, Family and Human Rights. But she, as an evangelical, is visibly disadvantaged
compared to the large number of olavetes in more important government
positions. It is a harmful disadvantage, on the part of the Bolsonaro
administration, as it goes directly against its evangelical voters, who are
seen by astrologer Carvalho as worse than Marxists, according to his statement
in September 2018.

Brazil has not fallen into this
leftist-Catholic tradition because of the advance of evangelical churches,
which supported Bolsonaro because they saw conservative qualities in him,
especially in the issues of abortion and homosexuality, which are aligned with
their conservative, Bible-based views.

Bolsonaro did very well by rejecting the
radicalism of left-wing Catholics, especially the NCBB.

Yet, by giving preference to olavetes, who
are syncretic Catholics who embrace a kind of esoteric fascism, to the
detriment of evangelicals who strongly supported him, Bolsonaro is playing a
strange game with his constituents. This game involves manipulation and
opportunism.

If Bolsonaro thought that astrologer Carvalho
was enough to elect him, why before the election did he give preference to
evangelicals? After his election was won, why did he change his stance, giving
preference to olavetes?

If it was not right for former socialist
presidents Lula and Dilma to turn the Brazilian government into a big source of
jobs for left-wing militants, why would it now be right to turn the Brazilian
government into a big source of jobs for olavete militants?

If General Heleno thought that the
left-wing conduct of the NCBB and the Vatican “is interference in the internal
affairs of Brazil,” why think that the advance of esoteric fascism within the
Bolsonaro administration promoted by two adherents of an Islamic sorcerer would
be less interference?

You cannot have a healthy victory, in the
fight against the NCBB’s leftism, by choosing esoteric fascism. The only
healthy way to defeat the powerful Catholic left is to do what has been done
throughout Latin America by a majority of conservative evangelical churches:
Preach the Gospel of the Kingdom of God, healing the sick and casting out demons.

Sunday, February 03, 2019

A Saudi
Candy to America: A Saudi Sculpture and Flag Erected at the World Trade Center,
Where 3,000 Americans Were Killed by Saudi Terrorists

By Julio
Severo

A sculpture celebrating the Islamic dictatorship
of Saudi Arabia had been erected on the World Trade Center grounds on December,
near the 9/11 memorial site. The exhibit included a Saudi flag.

Shaped to resemble a piece of candy, the
nine-foot-tall statue bore the Saudi emerald flag emblazoned with the
Arabic inscription, “There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is the prophet.”

The Saudi exhibit at the World Trade
Center raised questions because of longstanding accusations directed
toward Saudi Arabia in the aftermath of the September 11 terror attacks. In
2003, hundreds of families affected by theses attacks sued Saudi Arabia
over its alleged involvement in harboring terrorism — given that 15 of the 19
hijackers were Saudi. But the U.S. government squashed their suit.

The Saudi exhibit was set to remain at the
World Trade Center until Feb. 28. But after protests, U.S. officials said that
the exhibit would move to another location in New York.

Move to another location? This is not
enough to change the fact that the Saudi exhibit is an insult to the memory of 3,000
Americans who were victims of Saudi terror.

Usually, a rapist who rapes children
firstly offers them a candy and next rapes them. Saudis first “raped” America —
if you can call 9/11 a terrorist “rape” — and now they offer America a symbolic
candy! Devilishly “nice,” isn’t it?

There is only a problem in this analogy.
America is not a vulnerable child at the mercy of a Muslim rapist. America not
only is unafraid of wars, but even likes them. So it is no surprise that U.S.
right-wing and left-wing presidents have been notoriously warmongers, in a
lesser or greater degree. A minor problem with America awakens her always ready
war machine to invade.

Why has Saudi Arabia never been invaded?

What hinders U.S. presidents — from Bush
to Obama to Trump — from giving Saudi Arabia exactly what it deserves is the
fact that the Saudi Islamic dictatorship is the greatest buyer of U.S. heavy
arms. If it were not for this fact, Saudi Arabia would have been long ago
bombed and invaded — not to mention that the U.S. government — from Bush to
Obama to Trump — would stop shielding Saudi Arabia from lawsuits from American
relatives of the 3,000 victims of the Saudi attack on the World Trade Center on
9/11.

It seems that the America controlled by
neocons can waste 3,000 American lives, provided that in return she — actually,
the neocons — gets a massive amount of cash — which the Saudis have been
dutifully doing by purchasing untold billions in U.S. heavy weapons. If America
gets really concerned about 3,000 American lives lost, she loses the deal. If
she prizes the Saudi deal, she gets cash and a symbolic candy.

Certainly, when Saudi Arabia runs out of
cash, neocons will keep Saudi Arabia accountable for all its crimes.

Astrologer Olavo de
Carvalho calls for Brazilian Federal Police to investigate Julio Severo on the
allegation that accusations against him involving the Inquisition and occultism
are collusions paid by the Russian government that threaten the Brazilian
national security

Olavo de Carvalho and the art of
pretending to be a victim, the art of dissimulating, the art of slandering and
the art of making veiled threats

By
Julio
Severo

In
a video published on January 27, 2019, Olavo de Carvalho called for the Brazilian
Federal Police to investigate me on the grounds that I am an “attacker with connections
to the Russian government,” as if the exposés I make about him were some
conspiracy in which I am paid by the Russian government to disrupt his “wonderful”
plans to save Brazil.

Carvalho
added: “Julio has made several trips to Russia paid by the Russian government.
Why do not [the Federal Police] investigate it?”

The implication of his complaint is that I
am paid by the Russian government to “attack him,” and this, according to his
allegation, deserves the actions of the Federal Police.

Reinforcing an alleged gravity of the
situation, he said, “Is not that a foreign intervention
on a national matter?”

That is, in his view it is impossible for
my exposés against him not to have the collaboration of the Russian government,
indicating that exposing his ideas of the Inquisition and occultism are a
matter of national security and, to protect his ideas from these exposés, he
alleges that such exposés are a “foreign intervention” worthy of a Federal
Police investigation.

There is no escaping the fact that such a
mode of thinking is similar to the way of thinking of Islamic and communist
dictatorships. Whenever a blogger’s view bothers, a totalitarian regime (communist
China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, etc.) claims that the blogger violated
national security and is involved in some foreign conspiracy.

The Bolsonaro administration in Brazil has
already made an ugly mistake by following some “suggestions” from Carvalho, appointing
two ministers suggested by him. These appointments have displeased Brazilian
generals, who have publicly criticized Carvalho’s ministers. According to
Carvalho, these suggestions were made through his public videos. If the
Bolsonaro administration follows the latest video “suggestion” of Carvalho — of
a Federal Police investigation against Julio Severo over alleged conspiracy by
the Russian government against his ideas, which have become a matter of
national security —, Brazil is going to lower itself to the level of communist
China, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, etc.

Carvalho’s complaint video came shortly
after he complained about the generals in several comments, one of which he said in:

“I
alone did more against communist mental hegemony than all the generals combined.
That’s why so many of them do not like me. I am a living proof of their
omission, ineptitude, and cowardice.”

Sooner or later, he will call for an
investigation of the Federal Police against the generals, for the simple fact
that they do not recognize his supreme greatness that all his adherents who
have undergone brainwashing recognize.

The generals are worried about that. One
of them, General Paulo Chagas, wrote yesterday a Facebook post curiously
entitled “Olavo ‘Rasputin’ de Carvalho.”
As it is well known, the name Rasputin was given to Carvalho by me months ago
in the article “Jair
Bolsonaro’s Rasputin? How to Weaken a Right-Winger.” It seems the generals
are reading my articles. Will Carvalho now say that the generals are being
influenced by “Russian propaganda” from a “Russian agent”?

I am not worried about the slander and
lies of Carvalho, but about the almost submissive way in which Bolsonaro
follows his “suggestions.” Since Carvalho has put his own person as an uncriticizable
subject of national security that deserves to be protected by the Federal
Police against an “intervention” of the Russian government in collusion with me
against him, I will repeat what is already notorious.

I have already attended large pro-life
Catholic conferences, including in Aparecida and at the headquarters of the National
Conference of Catholic Bishops of Brazil, at the invitation of national
Catholic leaders. After this participation, many called me a Catholic or
enthusiastic Catholic, especially since I also participated in the founding of
great Brazilian pro-life Catholic movements, including the National Pro-Life
and Pro-Family Association in 1994 and the National Pro-Life and Pro-Family
Network in 2007. My deep connection to the Catholic pro-life movement since the
1980s has made me to be seen as an enthusiastic Catholic.

Many of these trips and participations
were paid by Catholic leaders. But I have never been accused of being a “Catholic
agent.” Will Carvalho now want to produce a video urging the Federal Police to
investigate if I am a Catholic agent paid by the Vatican?

I attended a single Russian pro-life
event, along with U.S. pro-life Jewish, Catholic and evangelical leaders, and I’m
being accused by a man who never had the support of these U.S. leaders.

While the American left accuses Trump of
collusion with Russia, Carvalho makes the same accusation against me.

I made a single trip to Russia. Thus the
accusation of Olavo de Carvalho that I have made several trips to Russia is
simply slander.

His accusation that such travels were paid
by the Russian government is also slander, since the trip I made to Russia was
exclusively funded by voluntary donations from Americans and Brazilians. My
trip to Russia was encouraged by Dr. Scott Lively, one of America’s greatest
evangelical leaders.

As far as I know, the theme of the
Inquisition has nothing to do with Russia. So to deal with Carvalho’s
pro-Inquisition obsession, what helped me most was American literature. No
country in the world produced more books against the Inquisition than the
United States. So, on this important subject, my base is the U.S., not Russia. Is
Carvalho going to say that there is an American collusion with me against the
Inquisition?

Interestingly, the Inquisition alleged accusations
against its Jewish and Protestant victims and put all the state force against
them for their view against any dogma of the Catholic Church. In the spirit of
the Inquisition, Carvalho is using the same kind of low blow against me.

I have disagreements with Catholicism, but
that has never prevented me for more than 30 years from supporting Catholic
efforts, including from the popes, to defend the lives of babies against legal
abortion.

I have disagreements with Russia, but that
does not stop me from supporting the exemplary Russian law that protects
children and adolescents against homosexual propaganda. I also support other
conservative measures from Russia.

I have disagreements with the U.S.
government, especially regarding the neocons and its nasty support of the
Islamic dictatorship of Saudi Arabia, but that does not stop me from supporting
the U.S. pro-life movement. I also have meetings with American evangelical
leaders.

If Carvalho wants to insist on his slander
campaign that because I went to the pro-life event in Russia I am a kind of
paid agent of the Russian government whose trip was paid by the Russian
government, he has an obligation to make the same accusation to the member of
the Institute Inter-American. More: He has a legal obligation to prove what he
is saying. He will have to raise the same slander against all the U.S. evangelical,
Catholic, and Jewish leaders who attended, just like me, the pro-family event
in Russia.

Interestingly, Dr. Larry Jacobs of the
World Congress of Families told me in Moscow that homosexual and leftist
organizations were pressuring the U.S. government, which was then under Obama,
to investigate all Americans who dared to attend the Russian event. Obama had
imposed sanctions against Russia, so the World Congress of Families could not
officially take part in the event, not to be punished by Obama. But many of the
World Congress of Family leaders, including Jacobs, attended the event, even
under the threat of homosexual and leftist organizations that wanted them to be
investigated by the U.S. government for collusion with the Russian government.

In a delayed effect, now Carvalho wants
against me the same governmental pressure that homosexual and leftist
organizations wanted against the U.S. pro-life Jewish, Catholic and evangelical
leaders who dared to take part in the pro-life event in Russia.

In any case, Carvalho has an obligation to
launch the same slander against all the Americans who went to the event. He’s
going to have to prove that they and I are all paid agents.

my
challenge is for a commission of international investigative officials to
examine our bank accounts (of me, Hank, Kincaid and Carvalho) to reveal to the
world our financial sources. Let us open our financial books. Let such a
commission investigate us. Only in this way will everybody know who is really
being paid to lie.

After 4 years, Carvalho has not yet
accepted the challenge of opening his bank accounts for investigation.

It would be a shame for the Bolsonaro administration
to call on the Federal Police to satisfy the slander of a man who has lived as
a self-exiled immigrant in the United States for 15 years and does not open his
own accounts for investigation. Instead, from a distance, he prefers to sit in
his chair smoking a pipe and causing confusion among everyone, from generals to
an evangelical blogger.

However, it would be interesting for the
Bolsonaro administration to call on the Federal Police to investigate the real
reasons for Carvalho’s flight from Brazil. He claims that he received “thousands”
of threats and that he had to flee because he had no support. How could he have
no support? One of his children worked for the police and he already had
friends in the Federal Police, including Eduardo Bolsonaro. Neither of them
wanted to help him?

Did he send a copy of these “thousands” of
threats to all his friends and relatives in the police?

Carvalho’s case is not, as he claims, a
national security case that merits actions by the Federal Police against an
evangelical blogger who denounces his connections with the occult and exposes
his insanity minimizing and even denying the suffering and death of Jews and Protestants
under the Inquisition.

Yet, his case may be national security
because of his attitude of slander, falsehood and lies to self-promote himself,
causing confusion and conspiracies even against generals.

There are other important issues that also
deserve to be investigated.

Has Carvalho properly paid his income
taxes in Brazil and the U.S.?

Has he hired for 15 years Brazilians with
a registered job at his house giving them visas following American law or, as a
cult leader, did he use schemes to get free work by volunteers deceived by his power
of persuasion?

Why did he need the Inter-American
Institute to get visas for his family?

Cannot the Federal Police investigate
this?

Cannot the FBI to investigate this?

In my case, if the Federal Police is driven
by the Bolsonaro administration to investigate me, it will find out that for
more than 10 years I worked at Carvalho’s Mídia Sem Máscara website, which I
thought was conservative, Catholic and pro-life. While I worked for free,
without ever having received a single penny of salary, the site received
various sponsorships, even from large companies. Have such sponsorships been
declared to the IRS? Can the Federal Police make an audit of Mídia Sem Máscara
and its sponsorship profits? If the sponsorship money never went to pay
columnists’ salaries, where was it going?

Do labor laws allow such an arrangement,
where a site profits from sponsorship and columnists get nothing?

Perhaps to ease his conscience, later,
once or twice, Carvalho appealed to the public to help me, as if that
compensated for the absence of salaries for me for more than ten years.

Inciting the Federal Police against an
evangelical blogger, who was used to work for free for a man who took advantage
of more than ten years of his work as a columnist in Mídia Sem Máscara, is the
attitude of an opportunist. To slander the victim who was used for more than
ten years in free labor is treacherous. It is the conduct of a treacherous
opportunist, typical of adherents of René Guénon. But like communists, who love
to portray themselves as victims while oppressing and threatening, Carvalho portrays
himself as a victim and portrays me as the oppressor.

What is the Bolsonaro administration, who
seems to love the video “suggestions” of Carvalho, going to do with the “suggestion”
of the latest video of the treacherous opportunist against me? Will it charge
the Federal Police to investigate the treacherous opportunist or his victim?