Almost all climate scientists agree: climate change is real!

New analysis of the vast body of research shows 97% of climate scientists agree that human activities are fuelling climate change, writes Tim Radford. But thanks to aggressive attempts to convince us otherwise, only 12% of people in the US are aware of this high level of agreement.

In the latest study, the researchers concluded that the greater the levels of expertise in climate science among those quizzed, the greater the likelihood of agreement that humans cause climate change.

In a rational world, it would have been an entirely unnecessary research project. But sadly not in Australia and the USA, hotbeds of climate change denialism.

Since the governments of 195 nations have de facto already accepted this, and collectively vowed at the UN climate conference in Paris last December to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel combustion and contain global warming if possible to a rise of 1.5C, it might be expected that citizens would need no further convincing. But surveys shows that they do - and particularly in the US.

And they have come up yet again with a conclusion that supports all previous research: that 96%-98% of climate scientists agree that climate change is caused by humans.

Consensus on consensus

Cook says he hopes this latest finding, which he terms "consensus on consensus", will enable scientists to focus on the real work - addressing climate change. "Global warming is the most serious issue of our age, and now scientists, engineers, and business and political leaders can focus their efforts on addressing it", he says.

Sarah Green, a chemistry professor at Michigan Technological University and one of the report's co-authors, adds: "What's important is that this is not just one study - it's the consensus of multiple studies."

Another co-author, Professor Naomi Oreskes, professor of the history of science at Harvard University, says: "Non-expert opinion and making unsupported assumptions can hugely impact the findings. However, with multiple studies finding consistent high levels of scientific agreement, we are confident the debate can now be put to bed."

The researchers base their conclusion on seven independent consensus studies already conducted by the co-authors. And it includes one in 2013, in which scientists surveyed more than 11,944 abstracts of scientific papers, and concluded - not for the first time - that most scientists agree that humans are changing the climate in which they so successfully evolved.

There has always been healthy and necessary scepticism about any research conclusion, and scientists themselves expect their conclusions to be replicated or proved in error, and their favourite hypotheses to be challenged, repeatedly.

None of these factors has much altered the overall conclusion, in a programme of sustained international research launched in 1988: climate is changing, and human economic activity is making it happen.

Levels of climate expertise

In the latest study, the researchers once again concluded that the greater the levels of expertise in climate science among those quizzed, the greater the likelihood of agreement that humans cause climate change.

Sources of possible confusion might include surveys of people who had already made up their minds that it isn't happening or that it isn't the fault of humans. It was possible, too, that those quizzed were not themselves experts in climate science: some might be economic geologists, with expertise in coal or oil deposits.

But the outcome, after more than a quarter of a century of scientific consensus on climate change, remains the same: only 12% of people in the US and 15% in Australia are aware that there is strong agreement among climate scientists.

"The public has a very skewed idea of how much disagreement there is in the scientific community", Professor Green says.

And as the paper concludes: "Agreement, or perceived agreement, about the extent and causes of climate change has no bearing on rational choices about greenhouse gas emission reduction - those are driven by the trade-offs between the impacts of climate change and the impacts of climate policy.

"But it does affect the public perception of and the political debate on climate policy, as does the integrity of climate research."

ECOLOGIST COOKIES

FOLLOWTHE ECOLOGIST

Help us keep the Ecologist platform going

Since 2012, the Ecologist has been owned and published by a small UK-based
charity called the Resurgence Trust. We work hard to support the kind of
independent journalism and comment that we know Ecologist readers enjoy but
we need your help to keep going. We do all this on a very small budget with
a very small editorial team and so joining the Trust or making a donation
will show us you value our work and support the platform which is currently
offered as a free service.