Rasmussen: Greece ranks second in defense spending among NATO countries

One can hardly believe such a thing. Greece in deep recession and inhuman austerity is number 2 in military spending among the NATO countries. This was revealed by NATO’s general secretary Anders Fogh Rasmussen. A very interesting report based on Rasmussen revelations is published by the New York Times.

Military in Greece Is Spared Cuts

Speaking at a meeting of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly in Prague, Mr. Rasmussen added that among the European allies, “only two devoted more than 2 percent of the gross domestic product to defense.”

One of those countries was Greece.

That seems astonishing given that Greece is in a deep economic and financial crisis. Greece’s economy has shrunk by 25 percent over the past two years.

During that time, the middle and lower classes — not the rich business community — have been hit hardest. The International Monetary Fund and the European Commission have imposed stringent austerity measures in return for loan guarantees. As a result, pensions and health care, transportation and education have all been cut drastically.

The armed forces, so far, have gotten away relatively lightly. During the height of the global financial crisis of 2008, Greek defense expenditures accounted for 3.1 percent of gross domestic product. Over the past two years, Greek defense spending still amounted to 2.1 percent of G.D.P.

“In relative terms, defense expenditure has been reduced given how much gross domestic product has fallen,” said Alexander S. Kritikos, an economics professor at the German Institute for Economic Research in Berlin.

“But the defense budget is still very high. It has been largely insulated from the huge cutbacks borne by the middle classes and poorer people,” he added.

Last August, the €10 billion, or $13 billion, defense budget was trimmed by €516 million. Even at that, Greece is the second-biggest defense spender among the 27 NATO countries after the United States, according to NATO statistics.

More than 73 percent of its budget is for personnel costs alone, making it one of the highest among NATO allies. Furthermore, military and civilian personnel account for 2.7 percent of Greece’s total labor force during, also making it one of the highest in NATO, according to alliance figures.

It is particularly hard to see how the armed forces can justify the current budget, as the money is not spent on supporting NATO or E.U. missions. According to the latest figures from the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force, Greece has 10 soldiers based in Afghanistan, out of a total of 102,011 troops from 50 countries.

In its neighborhood, Greece has 118 soldiers serving in NATO’s stabilization mission in Kosovo, out of a total of 5,565 troops from 30 contributing countries.

NATO does not publicly comment about any ally. But officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Greek government has not used the financial crisis to overhaul its armed forces by making the purchase of military equipment transparent, or reducing the personnel count of 136,000, of whom 90,000 are soldiers.

Curiously, the Greek public, which has often protested against the austerity measures, has yet to demand that the armed forces carry some of the burden. One reason, analysts say, is Greece’s residual fear of Turkey, a leading NATO member — despite the improvement of relations between the two countries over the past decade.

“It’s all very well calling for deeper defense cuts, but geography still matters. Certain fears still run deep,” said Tomas Valasek, president of the Central European Policy Institute, a security think tank in Bratislava, Slovakia.

Other analysts agree that the Greek armed forces can always resist big defense cuts by playing the Turkey card. “The generals will always have an excuse to keep the budget high,” Mr. Kritikos said.

Indeed, over the past several months, the Greek media have written that Turkey violated Greek airspace at least once. In response, the Turkish General Staff said its airspace had been repeatedly violated by Greece, Italy and Israel.

There is another political reason for exempting the army from cuts. Closing some of the 500 military bases and 17 training centers would mean sending tens of thousands of young soldiers into the ranks of the unemployed, adding a dangerous component to social unrest, according to Sipri, a Swedish research institute. Perhaps, analysts said, the Greek armed forces will have to wait for any major restructuring until the country’s economy picks up. (full article NYT)

However, I personally find most interesting in this NYT article, that the opinion expressed by “officials speaking on conditions of anonymity” coincides with this of Greece’s lenders, the trio from IMF/EU and ECB . KTG-reader may remember an article posted on November 20th 2012 with the title Troika seeks to end compulsory military service in Greece. In its Greece report on economy, the Troika proposed among others, the reduction of defense spending through the abolition of the compulsory military service alongside with electronic procurement system.

13 comments

What I would like to see is 100% of military procurement spending to go to local industry creating jobs… after all that is exactly what the US does 🙂

What a wonderful opportunity of creating growth in the country and increasing Tax revenue too. With billions spent each year surely Greece can create a military construction industry…

Just a few examples why we sadly still need strong military:

Turkish aircraft violates Greek airspace daily, Turkey a Nato ally still occupies 40% of Cyprus An Imperious Turkish Foreign policy (see naval base in Albania for example, Kurdish oppression, not recognising the extermination of Christians from modern Turkey throughout 20th century, declaring a Casus Belli if Greece rightfully and lawfully uses its territorial sea up to 12 miles on its islands continental shelf).

If there is such concern about military budgets, maybe US military contractors like Raython should start coughing up the truth about the defence procurement deals with Greece e.g. explain why

and maybe Raython should consider reimbursing the Greek Taxpayer for the 60 ‘blind’ aircraft.

But the NYT article does not allow comments… it sounds like a lot of propaganda in my opinion. Thank goodness we can express ourselves in your blog and we can ‘keeptalkingGreece” to our hearts’ content 🙂

And why on earth would Greece, or anybody else, become part of the death-merchant brigade? Haven’t they done enough damage already?
Wouldn’t that money be much better spend on the country and it’s citizens instead of more weapons?
Spend the money on making the country food and energy sufficient (which employs people in a meaningful, positive way), and there is no need to waste billions on guns and tanks and whatever else to protect oil and gas fields that might not even exist. But even if they do exist, they will eventually run dry, at which stage it will become very clear that the whole investment in deadly toys is indeed a complete waste of time, money, resources and a lot of people killed by them…

You might be interested in a (hopefully humorous) podcast of mine called “My Big Fat Greek Defence Budget”. It’s short (9 minutes) and is a bit of spoof investigative journalism into… well, I expect you can guess.

Why us it, that if somebody dares just mention the defence budget people like greekemmy pop up out of the woodwork and start make claims that Cyprus is part of Greece? I know a couple of Greek Cypriots who get very angy at this kind of ‘Turkish’ behaviour by people like greekemmy (if indeed she is Greek… and a she 😉 )