For those who have the same warped sense of humour this Letter can also be had in French.
(Complaints can be addressed to the Blog Council, your nearest newspaper, radio or TV station and when you leave this blog remember to pull the chain)
*Terms & Conditions Apply, if you can find them.

Thursday, June 16, 2016

CAPE TOWN SCANDAL: City won't stop dumping your money

Dear Cape
Town Citizens,

Van Eeden

AS A RATEPAYER MYSELF THIS MAKES MY BLOOD
BOIL. AND IF I THINK LIKE THIS I CAN’T IMAGINE WHAT WOULD GO THROUGH THE MINDS
OF THE HOMELESS POOR.

Your Council continues to play in its
favourite sand pit with thousands of your ratepayer’s money. It will be
millions more before you know it the way the bungling is going on.

This would be on top of the R5-million
that has already been thrown away on failed experiments at a rubbish dump site
that was closed for refuse 30 years ago.

Ironically it comes just as all our
service charges are about to go up by almost 10% - well above the inflation
rate.

The site is at Witsands next to a
popular surfing and wind surfing beach not far from Cape Point.

It is also a short distance from the
troubled Black township
of Masiphumelele and the
Coloured one of Ocean View where they are crying out for funds to upgrade the
facilities.

February & March earth moving takes place

In February and March this year a
regiment of huge earth moving equipment spent more than a month rearranging the
sand dunes – something that has been going on more or less in the same way for the
last 10 years.

The purpose of this massive
expenditure of R500 000 a year or more has been to stop what is left of
the buried rubbish from being washed into the sea by keeping it well covered in
an area where strong winds shift the sand around at most times of the year.

My impression is that instead of solving the
problem these machines make the dunes even more unstable and destroy any
vegetation that could hold it together that might have started growing on them.

May 10 road has to be cleared of sand.

The job was done so poorly that less than two months
after the dune moving had been completed a front end loader had to clear a
nearby road that was covered in sand.

June 8 earth movers are back doing exactly what they
had done before

That was early in May. Now a month later on 8 June the
same number of earth movers - a huge tracked bulldozer and excavator as well as
two dumper trucks – were brought in once again to cover large sections of
non-biodegradable material like glass and plastic that the wind had uncovered.

Sand being dumped in June in exactly the same place asit was put earlier in the year in February/March

March 7 net fencing is erected

The R200 000 net fencing on a 4 ha ridge that had
been built up parallel to the sea also proved to be a complete failure.

This
“tried and tested” method was put up last March by Vula Environmental
Restoration that claims to be dune restoration specialists.

“The nets work by disrupting the
airflow thus forcing wind to drop the sand load within the net field on top of
the old landfill site,” Deon van Eeden the head of Vula told me. “The sand is
then retained where it is required.”

March 13 first winter storms flattens or
buries nets

The system failed completely to retain
the sand because the wind was so strong during the first two winter storms that
most of the 5 km of netting was either buried completely or flattened. And a
large area of rubbish was exposed between the nets.

Net graveyard

May 30 some netting removed to prepare for
the dumping of more sand

They then had to be partially removed
so that tons more sand from further inland could be brought in to cover the exposed
area.

“The nets are maintained by lifting so
as to retain their functionality and to continue to catch the sand in the
target area,” Van Eeden said.

It is weeks since the nets were
trashed and very little has been done to raise them again.

Nets removed to make way for more sand to be dumped

Vula's contract runs until March
2017, but as the nets have been so ineffective so far it would seem pointless
in having them replaced.

In any event he revealed that they
were only put there in a “test” section to “inform the formulation of the
future management strategy for the Witsands landfill.”

After playing in this sand pit for more than 10 years
I would have thought the Council and its experts would have finished
experiments years ago.

I pointed out to Van Eeden that William Woodhouse, a
Professor of Soil Science and a member of the US Army Corps of Engineers, who
was an expert on dune stabilization,
maintained that the most effective way of doing this was with vegetation. It
was the only permanent solution as well as being very cost effective.

Van Eeden’s firm claims to have stabilized dunes with
indigenous grasses and to be able to produce vast quantities of indigenous plant
seed. So I asked him why the vegetation method had not been adopted at Witsands.

“The reason why the
entire 19 ha has not been instantaneouslyvegetated is that there has not been a detailed study of the
viability of this and there is not an Environmental Authorisation in terms of the relevant legislation to implement this,” he told me.

Mounds of sand that were covered naturally by the indigenous vegetation shows that this could possiblybe grown over the whole site

Councillor Johan
van der Merwe the Mayoral Committee Member for Environmental Planning gave me a similar explanation when he said, “It was almost impossible to do this as the sand is naturally mobile and if it were to be
successful this natural system would require several authorisations.”

“These,” he added,
“Were a Standard Operating Protocol as part of land fill closure.”

It is a terrible indictment on the Council
that 30 years after the dump was closed it has done nothing to overcome the
bureaucratic stumbling block that would have enable it to try covering the site
withvegetation – amethod that all the international experts
say is the one sure way of permanently stabilising dunes. And if it worked the
Council might never have to spend another cent there again.

There is no question that vegetation
will not grow there because all around the dump site the dunes are covered with
it growing naturally.

Van
Eeden confused the issue of whether to plant vegetation or not when he told me
that the net system was “indeed non-permanent but it aids significantly in
creating a stable environment and micro climate where seeds naturally occurring
in the sand can germinate. It is clear from past efforts that the unstable
environment is not conducive to self stabilisation.”

Another example of vegetation covered mounds in themiddle of the land fill site

Both he and the Council’s experts don’t seem to have taken
into account that Witsands is almost at what is known as the “Cape of Storms”
and that is why the net system did not work making it necessary to bring in the
earth movers once again.

The cost of hiring these is mind boggling made worse
because each of them has to be transported to and from the site on a low bed
truck. Somebody is making a killing and they are not from either of the nearby
townships I mentioned earlier.

Nothing will stop the City from continuing to build sand
castles over and over again with your money while it steadfastly refuses to
adopt the only method that could solve the problem once and for all at a minimum
cost.

What is being done is about as futile as digging
holes, filling them in and then digging them out again, only in this case it’s
at GREAT COST.

It is a disgraceful, outrageous
SCANDAL that should stop immediately because it can only seriously damage the
Council’s reputation.

Regards

Jon, a
Consumer Watchdog who does his best to make sure his bark is heard.

P.S. Before I put this on my blog I sent it to
Johan van der Merwe and invited him to make any comments he wished. The reply I
got was: “Please feel free to proceed without City comment.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

twitter

tweet

About Me

I was born in South Africa just before the Boer War whenever that was?
Started life with a golden spoon in my mouth which made eating rather difficult as a result I was under nourished as a child.
Went to a posh school where I only got moved up a class when my old man donated another sight screen for the cricket pitch.
Career prospects were dismal and I was once turned down for a job in the London sewers. "Too highly qualified;"that’s what they said.
I became a journalist when the Police Force wouldn’t have me.
Like most journos I know nothing about everything but I still write about it.
I decided to have my own blog so I wouldn't have to drink with the editor for hours on end to get my stuff published when according to my independent assessment it’s always of great news value.
My religious beliefs are: You only die once so remember, "You can’t be serious and Have Fun."
NEWS FLASH: I've just been appointed the Poor Man's Press Ombudsman by Presidential Decree (Not to be confused with the PRESS COUNCIL OF SOUTH AFRICA'S, SA Press Ombudsman)