In obedience to the Proclamation of the
Honorable Tim Walz, Governor of the State of Minnesota, summoning the two
houses of the Legislature to meet in Special Session, the members of the House
of Representatives, pursuant to the Governor's Proclamation, assembled in the
State Capitol in Saint Paul on Friday, the twenty-fourth day of May, 2019 at
10:00 a.m.

PROCLAMATION
FOR SPECIAL SESSION 2019

Whereas,
The Ninety-First Legislature adjourned its 2019 regular session without enacting
legislation critical to the health, well-being, and safety of the citizens of
Minnesota; and

Whereas,
The unfinished matters of the Legislature include laws essential to balancing
the state budget; and

Whereas,
The Minnesota Constitution allows the Governor to call a special session of the
Legislature on extraordinary occasions; and

Whereas,
An extraordinary occasion, as envisioned the Minnesota Constitution has arisen;
and

Whereas,
The people of Minnesota would be best served by a prompt conclusion of
legislative business and avoidance of a government shutdown; and

Whereas,
The Governor and elected legislative leaders have reached an agreement on an
agenda and procedure to complete a special session in the shortest time
possible.

Now,
Therefore, I, Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota, by the authority vested in
me by Article IV, Section 12 of the Minnesota Constitution and Section 4.03 of
the Minnesota Statutes, summon the members of the Legislature to convene in
Special Session on Friday, May 24, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. at the State Capitol in
Saint Paul, Minnesota.

In
Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of
the State of Minnesota to be affixed at the State Capitol on Thursday, May 23,
2019.

Steve SimonTim Walz

Secretary of StateGovernor

At the hour of 10:00 a.m. and
pursuant to the Proclamation of the Governor and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
2018, Section 3.073, the Honorable Melissa
Hortman, Speaker of the House, called the House of Representatives to order.

The members of
the House gave the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of
America.

The roll was
called and the following members were present:

Acomb

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Bahner

Bahr

Baker

Becker-Finn

Bennett

Bernardy

Bierman

Boe

Brand

Cantrell

Carlson, A.

Carlson, L.

Christensen

Claflin

Considine

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Davnie

Dehn

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Erickson

Fabian

Fischer

Franson

Freiberg

Garofalo

Gomez

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Gunther

Haley

Halverson

Hamilton

Hansen

Hassan

Hausman

Heinrich

Her

Hertaus

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Johnson

Jurgens

Klevorn

Koegel

Koznick

Kresha

Kunesh-Podein

Lee

Lesch

Liebling

Lien

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Loeffler

Long

Lucero

Mahoney

Mann

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Munson

Murphy

Nash

Nelson, M.

Nelson, N.

Neu

Noor

Nornes

O'Driscoll

Olson

O'Neill

Pelowski

Persell

Pierson

Pinto

Poston

Pryor

Quam

Richardson

Robbins

Runbeck

Sandell

Sandstede

Sauke

Schomacker

Schultz

Scott

Stephenson

Sundin

Swedzinski

Tabke

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

Vang

Vogel

Wagenius

Wazlawik

West

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Zerwas

Spk. Hortman

A quorum was
present.

Heintzeman, Kiel,
Lueck, Petersburg and Poppe were excused.

Layman was
excused until 2:25 p.m.Kotyza-Witthuhn
was excused until 7:35 p.m.

Pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes 2018, Section 3.073, the Speaker declared the House of
Representatives organized for the 2019 Special Session.

Winkler
moved that the Chief Clerk be and is hereby instructed to inform the Senate and
the Governor by message that the House of Representatives is now duly organized
pursuant to law for this Special Session.The motion prevailed.

Winkler moved
that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair.The motion prevailed.

Pursuant
to Article IV, Section 19, of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota,
Winkler moved that the rule therein be suspended and an urgency be declared and
that the rules of the House be so far suspended so that
S. F. No. 1 be given its second and third readings and be placed
upon its final passage.The motion
prevailed.

Pursuant
to Article IV, Section 19, of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota,
Winkler moved that the rule therein be suspended and an urgency be declared and
that the rules of the House be so far suspended so that
S. F. No. 3 be given its third reading and be placed upon its
final passage. The motion prevailed.

H. F. No.
16, A bill for an act relating to state government; reducing the size of the
senate to one member; reducing the size of the house of representatives to one
member; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 2.021; repealing Minnesota
Statutes 2018, section 2.031, subdivision 1.

The bill was
read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.

H. F. No.
6 was reported to the House.

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 19

DECLARATION OF URGENCY

Pursuant
to Article IV, Section 19, of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota,
Winkler moved that the rule therein be suspended and an urgency be declared and
that the rules of the House be so far suspended so that
H. F. No. 6 be given its second and third readings and be placed
upon its final passage.The motion
prevailed.

Pursuant to
Article IV, Section 19, of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota, Winkler
moved that the rule therein be suspended and an urgency be declared and that
the rules of the House be so far suspended so that S. F. No. 7
be given its second and third readings and be placed upon its final
passage.The motion prevailed.

S. F. No. 7
was read for the second time.

Pursuant
to rule 1.50, Winkler moved that the House be allowed to continue in session
after 12:00 midnight.The motion
prevailed.

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 22

The
bill was read for the third time and placed upon its final passage.

The
question was taken on the passage of the bill and the roll was called.There were 84 yeas and 43 nays as follows:

Those
who voted in the affirmative were:

Acomb

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Bernardy

Bierman

Boe

Brand

Cantrell

Carlson, A.

Carlson, L.

Christensen

Claflin

Considine

Davids

Davnie

Dehn

Demuth

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Fischer

Freiberg

Gomez

Gunther

Halverson

Hamilton

Hansen

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Kunesh-Podein

Layman

Lee

Lesch

Liebling

Lien

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Loeffler

Long

Mahoney

Mann

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Nelson, N.

Noor

Nornes

Olson

Pelowski

Persell

Pinto

Pryor

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Sauke

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Tabke

Urdahl

Vang

Wagenius

Wazlawik

West

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman

Those who voted
in the negative were:

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 23

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Baker

Bennett

Daniels

Daudt

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Fabian

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Haley

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Johnson

Jurgens

Koznick

Kresha

Lucero

Mekeland

Miller

Munson

Neu

O'Driscoll

O'Neill

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Robbins

Runbeck

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Vogel

Zerwas

The
bill was passed and its title agreed to.

Winkler moved
that the House recess subject to the call of the Chair.The motion prevailed.

RECESS

RECONVENED

The House
reconvened and was called to order by the Speaker.

H. F. No.
5 was reported to the House.

DECLARATION
OF URGENCY

Pursuant to
Article IV, Section 19, of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota, Winkler
moved that the rule therein be suspended and an urgency be declared and that
the rules of the House be so far suspended so that H. F. No. 5
be given its second and third readings and be placed upon its final
passage.The motion prevailed.

Subd. 10.Section
179 expensing.For property
placed in service in taxable years​ beginning before January 1, 2021,
80 percent of the amount by which the deduction allowed under the dollar limits
of section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code exceeds the deduction allowable by
section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended through December 31, 2003,
is an addition.

EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective for taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2020."

Page 22,
after line 22, insert:

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 24

Subd. 12.Section
179 expensing.For property
placed in service in taxable years​ beginning before January 1, 2021,
80 percent of the amount by which the deduction allowed under the dollar limits
of section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code exceeds the deduction allowable by
section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended through December 31, 2003,
is an addition.

EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective for taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2020."

Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references

Amend the
title accordingly

A
roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The
question was taken on the Swedzinski amendment and the roll was called.There were 54 yeas and 73 nays as follows:

Those
who voted in the affirmative were:

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Baker

Bennett

Boe

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Fabian

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Gunther

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Johnson

Jurgens

Koznick

Kresha

Layman

Lucero

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Munson

Nelson, N.

Neu

Nornes

O'Driscoll

O'Neill

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Robbins

Runbeck

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

Vogel

West

Zerwas

Those
who voted in the negative were:

Acomb

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Bernardy

Bierman

Brand

Cantrell

Carlson, A.

Carlson, L.

Christensen

Claflin

Considine

Davnie

Dehn

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Fischer

Freiberg

Gomez

Halverson

Hansen

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Kunesh-Podein

Lee

Lesch

Liebling

Lien

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Loeffler

Long

Mahoney

Mann

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson

Persell

Pinto

Pryor

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Sauke

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Tabke

Vang

Wagenius

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman

The
motion did not prevail and the amendment was not adopted.

Torkelson moved to amend H. F. No. 5 as
follows:

Page 109,
after line 23, insert:

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 25

Subd. 102.Agricultural
riparian buffers.(a)
Eligible land that qualifies for classification as class 2a and 2b under
section 273.13, subdivision 23, is exempt.For the purposes of this subdivision, "eligible land" means a
riparian buffer as defined in section 103F.48, provided that the landowner is
in compliance with the requirements of section 103F.48.

(b) The
local soil and water conservation district must certify eligible land to the
county assessor by December 31 in order for the exemption under this
subdivision to apply for taxes payable in the following year.This certification is effective until the
local soil and water conservation district notifies the assessor that the land
is no longer in compliance with section 103F.48.The local soil and water conservation
districts must annually notify their county's assessor by December 31 of any
landowner who is not in compliance with the requirements of section 103F.48.

Subdivision
1.Certification.For
land qualifying for exemption under section 272.02, subdivision 102, the county
auditor must certify to the commissioner of revenue the information necessary
for the commissioner to determine the reimbursements made under subdivision 3.The county auditor must make this
certification for each taxes payable year as part of the data required under
section 270C.85, subdivision 2.Any
prior-year adjustments must also be certified as part of the data required
under section 270C.85, subdivision 2.The commissioner must review the certifications for accuracy and may
make any changes deemed necessary or return the certification to the county
auditor for correction.

Subd. 2.Calculation.The commissioner of revenue shall
calculate the reimbursement for the exemption under section 272.02, subdivision
102, in each local taxing district based on the information certified under
subdivision 1.

Subd. 3.Payment.(a) The commissioner of revenue shall reimburse
each local taxing jurisdiction, other than school districts, for the gross
property tax amount attributed to the exemption under section 272.02,
subdivision 102, in two equal installments on October 31 and December 26 of the
taxes payable year for which the exemptions are granted, including in each
payment the prior-year adjustments certified under section 270C.85, subdivision
2, for that taxes payable year.

(b) The
commissioner of revenue shall certify the total of the reimbursements
attributed to the exemption under section 272.02, subdivision 102, for each
taxes payable year within each school district to the commissioner of
education, and the commissioner of education must pay the reimbursement amounts
to each school district as provided in section 273.1392.

(c) The
reimbursement to each local taxing jurisdiction under this subdivision must be
equal to the reduction in gross property tax payable to each local taxing
jurisdiction resulting from the exemption under section 272.02, subdivision 102.

Subd. 4.Appropriation.An amount sufficient to make the
payments required by this section to taxing jurisdictions other than school
districts is annually appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of
revenue.An amount sufficient to make
the payments required by this section for school districts is annually
appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of education.

Subd. 4.Aid
termination.The aid provided under
this section terminates on June 30, 2020.continues until the earlier
of:

(1) the last day of the
fiscal year immediately following the fiscal year in which the actuarial value
of assets of the general employees retirement plan of the Public Employees
Retirement Association first equals or exceeds the actuarial accrued liabilities of the plan as reported in the annual
actuarial valuation prepared under section 356.215; or

(2) June 30, 2048.

EFFECTIVE DATE.This
section is effective the day following final enactment."

Pages 222 to 223, delete
sections 13 and 14

Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was
requested and properly seconded.

The question was
taken on the O'Driscoll amendment and the roll was called.There were 53 yeas and 75 nays as follows:

Those who voted
in the affirmative were:

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Baker

Bennett

Boe

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Fabian

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Gunther

Haley

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Johnson

Jurgens

Koznick

Kresha

Layman

Lucero

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Munson

Nelson, N.

Neu

Nornes

O'Driscoll

O'Neill

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Robbins

Runbeck

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

Vogel

West

Zerwas

Those who voted
in the negative were:

Acomb

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Bernardy

Bierman

Brand

Cantrell

Carlson, A.

Carlson, L.

Christensen

Claflin

Considine

Davnie

Dehn

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Fischer

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 28

Freiberg

Gomez

Halverson

Hamilton

Hansen

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Kunesh-Podein

Lee

Lesch

Liebling

Lien

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Loeffler

Long

Mahoney

Mann

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson

Pelowski

Persell

Pinto

Pryor

Richardson

Sandell

Sandstede

Sauke

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Tabke

Vang

Wagenius

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman

The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.

Davids moved to amend H. F. No. 5 as
follows:

Page 72,
line 8, delete "$5,150" and insert "$5,840"

Page 72,
line 11, delete "$4,020" and insert "$4,590"

Page 222,
delete section 13

Page 223,
delete section 14

A
roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The
question was taken on the Davids amendment and the roll was called.There were 54 yeas and 73 nays as follows:

Those
who voted in the affirmative were:

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Baker

Bennett

Boe

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Fabian

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Gunther

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Johnson

Jurgens

Koznick

Kresha

Layman

Lucero

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Munson

Nelson, N.

Neu

Nornes

O'Driscoll

O'Neill

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Robbins

Runbeck

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

Vogel

West

Zerwas

Those who voted
in the negative were:

Acomb

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Bernardy

Bierman

Brand

Cantrell

Carlson, A.

Carlson, L.

Christensen

Claflin

Considine

Davnie

Dehn

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Fischer

Freiberg

Gomez

Halverson

Hansen

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Kunesh-Podein

Lee

Lesch

Liebling

Lien

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Loeffler

Long

Mahoney

Mann

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 29

Subd. 8.City formula aid.(a) For aids payable in 20182020
and thereafter, the formula aid for a city is equal to the product of (1) the
difference between its unmet need and its certified aid in the previous year and
before any aid adjustment under subdivision 13, and (2) the aid gap percentage.

(b) The applicable aid gap percentage must be
calculated by the Department of Revenue so that the total of the aid under
subdivision 916 equals the total amount available for aid under
section 477A.03.The aid gap percentage
must be the same for all cities subject to paragraph (a).Data used in calculating aids to cities under
sections 477A.011 to 477A.013 shall be the most recently available data as of
January 1 in the year in which the aid is calculated.

EFFECTIVE
DATE.This section is
effective for aids payable in calendar year 2020 and thereafter.

Subd. 9.Preliminary city aid distribution.(a) In calendar year 20182020
and thereafter, if a city's certified aid before any aid adjustment under
subdivision 13 for the previous year is less than its current unmet need, the
city shall receive an aid distribution equal to the sum of (1) its certified
aid in the previous year before any aid adjustment under subdivision 13, (2)
the city formula aid under subdivision 8, and (3) its aid adjustment under
subdivision 13.

(b) For aids payable in 2018 and thereafter,
if a city's certified aid before any aid adjustment under subdivision 13
for the previous year is equal to or greater than its current unmet need, the
total aid for a city is equal to the greater of (1) its unmet need plus any aid
adjustment under subdivision 13, or (2) the amount it was certified to receive
in the previous year minus the lesser of $10 multiplied by its population, or
five percent of its net levy in the year prior to the aid distribution.No city may have a total aid amount less than
$0 under this paragraph.

(c) If a city's aid distribution under
paragraph (b) is equal to $0, the city is eligible for an alternative aid
distribution under subdivision 15.

(d) For aids payable in 2020 only, no
city's aid amount before any adjustment under subdivision 13, may be less than
its pay 2019 certified aid amount, less any adjustment under subdivision 13 for
that year.

EFFECTIVE
DATE.This section is
effective for aids payable in calendar year 2020 and thereafter.

Subd. 15.Alternative per capita aid.(a) Beginning in calendar year 2020
and thereafter, if a city's certified aid under section 9 is $0 it shall receive
an aid payment under this subdivision equal to the lesser of $200,000 or the
sum of the following:

Journal of the
House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top of Page 30

(1) a base amount equal to
the lesser of $40 multiplied by its population, or $60,000; and

(2) a formula amount equal
to its population multiplied by a per capita amount, where the per capita
amount is set so that the total aid paid under this subdivision is the amount
allocated for alternative aid under section 477A.03, subdivision 2a.

(b) Beginning with aids
payable in 2021 and thereafter, the amounts of $40 and $60,000 in paragraph (a),
clause (1), shall be increased by a percent equal to the percent increase
in the total limit on city aid under section 477A.03, subdivision 2a, for the
payable year that is being calculated compared to the appropriation for aids
payable in 2020.

EFFECTIVE DATE.This
section is effective for aids payable in calendar year 2020 and thereafter.

Subd. 16.Final
city aid distribution.For
aids payable in 2020 and thereafter, the aid distribution for a city receiving
aid under subdivision 9 is equal to the greater of the amount it would receive
under subdivision 9 or the amount it would receive if it qualified for
alternative aid under subdivision 15.For aids payable in 2020 and thereafter, the aid distribution for a city
that receives zero aid under subdivision 9 is the alternative aid calculated
under subdivision 15.

EFFECTIVE DATE.This
section is effective for aids payable in calendar year 2020 and thereafter."

Page 146, line 20,
delete"$560,398,012" and insert "$570,398,012"

Page 146, line 22, delete
"$564,398,012." and insert "$574,398,012.Beginning with aids payable in 2020 and thereafter, 1.75 percent of this amount will be
paid as alternative aid to cities under section 477A.03, subdivision 15."

Pages 222 to 223, delete
sections 13 and 14

Renumber the sections in
sequence and correct the internal references

Amend the title accordingly

A roll call was
requested and properly seconded.

The question was
taken on the Hertaus amendment and the roll was called.There were 54 yeas and 73 nays as follows:

Those who voted
in the affirmative were:

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Baker

Bennett

Boe

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Fabian

Franson

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Gunther

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Johnson

Jurgens

Koznick

Kresha

Layman

Lucero

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Munson

Nelson, N.

Neu

Nornes

O'Driscoll

O'Neill

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Robbins

Runbeck

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

Vogel

West

Zerwas

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 31

Pursuant to
Article IV, Section 19, of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota, Winkler
moved that the rule therein be suspended and an urgency be declared and that
the rules of the House be so far suspended so that S. F. No. 8
be given its second and third readings and be placed upon its final
passage.The motion prevailed.

Subdivision
1.Supervised
release required.(a) Except
as provided in subdivisions 1b, 4, and 5, every inmate shall serve a supervised
release term upon completion of the inmate's term of imprisonment as reduced by
any good time earned by the inmate or extended by confinement in punitive
segregation pursuant to section 244.04, subdivision 2.Except for a sex offender conditionally
released under Minnesota Statutes 2004, section 609.108, subdivision 5, the
supervised release term shall be equal to the period of good time the inmate
has earned, and shall not exceed the length of time remaining in the inmate's
sentence.

(b) An
inmate of a state correctional facility who is convicted of violating section
609.221, 609.222, 609.223, 609.2231, or 609.224 for assaulting an employee of
the Department of Corrections forfeits any good time earned prior to the
assault conviction.

Subd. 1b.Supervised
release; offenders who commit crimes on or after August 1, 1993.(a) Except as provided in subdivisions 4
and 5, every inmate sentenced to prison for a felony offense committed on or
after August 1, 1993, shall serve a supervised release term upon completion of
the inmate's term of imprisonment and any disciplinary confinement period
imposed by the commissioner due to the inmate's violation of any disciplinary
rule adopted by the commissioner or refusal to participate in a rehabilitative
program required under section 244.03.The amount of time the inmate serves on supervised release shall be
equal in length to the amount of time remaining in the inmate's executed
sentence after the inmate has served the term of imprisonment and any
disciplinary confinement period imposed by the commissioner.

(b) No
inmate who violates a disciplinary rule or refuses to participate in a
rehabilitative program as required under section 244.03 shall be placed on
supervised release until the inmate has served the disciplinary confinement
period for that disciplinary sanction or until the inmate is discharged or
released from punitive segregation confinement, whichever is later.The imposition of a disciplinary confinement
period shall be considered to be a disciplinary sanction imposed upon an
inmate, and the procedure for imposing the disciplinary confinement period and
the rights

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 36

of the
inmate in the procedure shall be those in effect for the imposition of other
disciplinary sanctions at each state correctional institution.

(c) An
inmate of a state correctional facility who is convicted of violating section
609.221, 609.222, 609.223, 609.2231, or 609.224 for assaulting an employee of
the Department of Corrections forfeits any good time earned prior to the
assault conviction."

Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references

Amend the
title accordingly

A
roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The
question was taken on the Johnson amendment and the roll was called.There were 52 yeas and 75 nays as follows:

Those
who voted in the affirmative were:

Albright

Anderson

Backer

Baker

Bennett

Boe

Daniels

Daudt

Davids

Demuth

Dettmer

Drazkowski

Erickson

Fabian

Garofalo

Green

Grossell

Gruenhagen

Gunther

Haley

Hamilton

Heinrich

Heintzeman

Hertaus

Johnson

Jurgens

Koznick

Kresha

Layman

Lucero

McDonald

Mekeland

Miller

Munson

Nelson, N.

Neu

Nornes

O'Driscoll

O'Neill

Pierson

Poston

Quam

Robbins

Schomacker

Scott

Swedzinski

Theis

Torkelson

Urdahl

Vogel

West

Zerwas

Those
who voted in the negative were:

Acomb

Bahner

Becker-Finn

Bernardy

Bierman

Brand

Cantrell

Carlson, A.

Carlson, L.

Christensen

Claflin

Considine

Davnie

Dehn

Ecklund

Edelson

Elkins

Fischer

Freiberg

Gomez

Halverson

Hansen

Hassan

Hausman

Her

Hornstein

Howard

Huot

Klevorn

Koegel

Kotyza-Witthuhn

Kunesh-Podein

Lee

Lesch

Liebling

Lien

Lillie

Lippert

Lislegard

Loeffler

Long

Mahoney

Mann

Mariani

Marquart

Masin

Moller

Moran

Morrison

Murphy

Nelson, M.

Noor

Olson

Pelowski

Persell

Pinto

Pryor

Richardson

Runbeck

Sandell

Sandstede

Sauke

Schultz

Stephenson

Sundin

Tabke

Vang

Wagenius

Wazlawik

Winkler

Wolgamott

Xiong, J.

Xiong, T.

Youakim

Spk. Hortman

The motion did not prevail and the
amendment was not adopted.

Franson moved to amend S. F. No. 8 as
follows:

Page 26,
after line 18, insert:

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 37

Subdivision
1.Crime.Except as otherwise permitted in
subdivision 2, the following individuals are guilty of a crime:

(1)
whoever knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates, in whole or in part,
the labia majora, labia minora, or clitoris of another is guilty of a
felony.Consent to the procedure by a
minor on whom it is performed or by the minor's parent is not a defense to a
violation of this subdivision.; or

(2) the
parent, guardian, or other person legally responsible or charged with the care
or custody of a minor who knowingly allows the circumcision, excision, or
infibulation, in whole or in part, of the labia majora, labia minora, or
clitoris of the minor is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

EFFECTIVE
DATE.This section is effective August 1, 2019, and applies to crimes
committed on or after that date.

Subd. 3.Custody
of child.(a) A violation of,
or attempt to violate subdivision 1, clause (2), is a condition that endangers
a child's health or welfare and justifies taking the child into custody
pursuant to section 260C.175, subdivision 1.

(b)
Reunification of a child with a parent is not required if the parent has been
convicted of a violation of subdivision 1, clause (2).

(d)
Education, prevention, and outreach activities conducted by the commissioner of
health in communities that traditionally practice female circumcision,
excision, or infibulation shall inform people in those communities about the
potential loss of custody of a child.

EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective August 1,
2019, and applies to violations committed on or after that date."

Renumber the
sections in sequence and correct the internal references

Amend the
title accordingly

A
roll call was requested and properly seconded.

The question was
taken on the Franson amendment and the roll was called.There were 52 yeas and 71 nays as follows:

Those who voted
in the affirmative were:

Journal of the House – 1st Day - Friday, May 24, 2019 - Top
of Page 38