I definitely could be wrong, but I believe Fascism and National Socialism are different. Fascism as developed by the Italians did not focus on race at all; rather, it focused on culture. They believed that one attained superiority through state of mind rather than physical traits.

To an extent, I think that is preferable to Adolf's version. After all, if there was a war, and a bunch of armed Muslims or Mexicans came up to you and asked to fight in your army, why turn away useful cannon fodder?

I definitely could be wrong, but I believe Fascism and National Socialism are different. Fascism as developed by the Italians did not focus on race at all; rather, it focused on culture. They believed that one attained superiority through state of mind rather than physical traits.

To an extent, I think that is preferable to Adolf's version. After all, if there was a war, and a bunch of armed Muslims or Mexicans came up to you and asked to fight in your army, why turn away useful cannon fodder?

You have got to be kidding me.

We turn them away because they are not our people and because their fight is not our fight. A people that cannot sustain itself through strength of arm is inferior and deserves to be conquered. The problem with the Nazis is that they were betrayed by their own Germanic peoples. If whites were to band together we wouldn't need the help of anyone but ourselves.

Fascism is good. I am Fascist - but Fascism in and of itself is not specific. Fascism is to National Socialism what Christianity is to Lutheranism. The overarching ideological aspect of Fascist doctrine is geared towards an "engergizing myth" or "unifying myth" behind which a whole people mobilize and work together (collaborate) for the good and glory of the nation, and only ever in the best interest of a people. This social myth can allude to Rome as in the case of Fascist Italy, or the Aryan race in the case of Nazi Germany. Both concepts are equally viable and are intended to culminate in a final end to class-conflict and emergence of a superior people (or race).

__________________

I'm so sick of hearing the term "people of color". The white race comprises a beautiful diversity of hair, eye, and skin color. In fact, we're the ONLY people of color! Unless they mean mud color.

I find arguing over details a fruitless endeavour, but i would like to make one small correction. Since i saw it mentioned;

Do not confuse what we have come to think of as 'democracy' with what democracy really was in the time of my forefathers. The image and connotations that spring to mind are a result of propaganda, misunderstandings and vast alterations in political systems.

Democracy is a compound word deriving from:
- Demos (Δήμος), which means the group of individuals having political rights, because not all citizens had them, even within each sovereign state.
- Kratos (Κράτος), which stems from Power, or the Power to Govern. Those select few recognised as worthy of voting would elevate one among them into a position of power.

It never was nor was meant to be an 'all-in-one', 'everyone has rights!!!', 'inclusive' type of governing. It both recognised and shaped itself as a system within which the few capable/most bright would rule over the populace. No equal rights, no equal opportunities. On the contrary, it was a system that promoted, maintained and thrived from the keeping of slaves. Slaves, yes.
It understood and enforced the concepts of blood, honour, purity, valour.

Do these terms ring a bell?

We never did or intended to, allow for a system even remotely close to this 'modernised' crap we think of as 'democracy' today. Adolf Hitler understood. He used our symbols with good, valid reason. the rest sadly is a result of miscomprehensions, accidents, egos getting in the way and many many Jews spewing their lies.

I've read Mein Kampf in parts so far. Enough to at least give me a sense of what National Socialism means. It means that the state isn't an end in itself, but only a means to an end. That end being the preservation and progress of the race. In order to achieve this end it takes having a fraternally unified people all working together for the common welfare. That's what the "Socialism" in National Socialism is all about.

Exactly. Socialism in the NS way does not mean "free stuff for everyone" or steal from the rich, to give to the poor,...It means that white nationalists have to work together and fortify our strengths and overcome our foes. The foes being the liberal, anti white zionists who are hell bent on destroying our way of life,and ultimately eliminating our people from the face of the earth.

I think that if Germany had won World War Two there would have been a very dreadful state of affairs when it comes to Slavic nations fighting the Germans such as Poles,Russians,Serbs,Ukrainians and Belorussians.Those nations would have been almost totally exterminated as was stated in the General Plan East.If I remember correctly,Hitler wanted to exterminate 85% of them and enslave or germanise the rest.That would be a horrifying loss to the Indoeuropean race which all of you must surely understand.As a Pole I find Hitler's views on Slavic nations as abominable.Exterminating a nation,whatever that nation is,is genocide and,as such,is unforgetible and ought to never be even thought upon by anyone who has a soul.For Germanic nations there would have been germanisation which would have also been disastrous.Generally speaking,under Hitler,Western and Eastern Slavic nations would have been no more,the French would have been under the German boot,never to rise again as a great nation,large parts of eastern France would have been annexed to Germany,and Germanic nations would have been germanised and,as such,would disappear from the face of the Earth.What do you think on this topic?Do you approve of Hitler's extermination and germanisation policies?