There's no more explosive topic in American public life today than the issue
of Israel, its treatment of the Palestinians and its influence on American
politics. Yet the topic is one that is so hedged with anxiety, fury and
fear that honest discussion is often impossible."

--Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair

There
has been a concerted effort in the United States to block critical debate
about what is happening in Israel-Palestine, and a pervasive last-ditch
attempt to stifle criticism of Israel by smearing those who dare to raise
their voices. This book is a collection of articles dealing with the means
that the insidious slur of "anti-Semitism" has been used for political
ends. The articles range from a philosophical examination of the term
"anti-Semitism" to a survey of the topics that are not covered in US
discourse because of self-censorship induced by fear, fear of being labeled
an anti-Semite or fear of being targeted by pro-Israeli groups. The
consequences of this are evident for all to see: an uncritical acceptance of
interminable US wars, the generalized misery of the Palestinian people,
bloated armaments budgets, and massive US resources siphoned off to Israel.
To break the silence and allay fear over these topics requires critical
appraisal of what anti-Semitism actually means and to tackle the taboo that
it represents.

The philosopher
Michael Neumann analyzes the term, discussing alternative definitions and
examining the implications of these alternatives. Making the definition too
broad cheapens the term, creating its own problems, while if the definition
is too narrow, the accusation loses its political significance. Neumann
points out: "... there is a choice to be made. You can use anti-Semitism to
fit your political agenda, or you can use it as a term of condemnation, but
you cannot do both." This is a superlative discussion, with important
lessons for all.

Scott Handleman
criticizes the way "anti-Semitism" has been portrayed in recent books, that
is, the claim that anti-Semitism is something evil out there, irrational,
and the responsibility of others. He offers an alternative appraisal of
anti-Semitism by suggesting that the responsibility of its victim should
also be taken into account. Again, this is an important discussion to place
the various sanctimonious books on the topic into perspective.

There are several
Israeli perspectives on the issue, including an important one by Uri Avnery.
Avnery points out several Zionist myths and discusses how Israeli actions
contradict those myths. Whereas Zionists claimed that Israel was needed as
a refuge from anti-Semitism, the contradiction has arisen that Israel's
policies are actually causing much anti-Semitism. "For Jews, this creates a
dangerous vicious circle. Sharon's actions create revulsion and opposition
throughout the world. These reinforce anti-Semitism. Faced with this
danger, Jewish organizations are pushed into defending Israel and giving it
unqualified support. This support enables the anti-Semites to attack not
only the government of Israel but the local Jews, too." Avnery also makes
the important point that Zionists should consider the implications of their
actions taking into account that their project may go awry.

The self-censorship
also affects people from whom one would not otherwise have expected it.
Jeffrey Blankfort catalogs the unwillingness of many left activist groups to
take a stance critical of Israel. He provides a series of amazing examples:
the organizers of demonstrations against the US-Iraq war and their
unwillingness to take a critical stance vis-à-vis Israel; unions barely
willing to utter the word Israel in their literature or posters, and
relegating a mildly critical comment about the condition of the Palestinians
to the backside of a poster! For a critical assessment of the anti-war
movement and what passes for domestic opposition to the neo-imperial US
role, it is important to read this essay. It suggests that, for these
resistance movements to be effective, they need to have a critical view of
Israel. Unfortunately, such groups are reticent about starting this debate.

Kathy and Bill
Christison offer an amazing overview of the power and influence of the
neocons. They show that these rightwing zealots are inextricably bonded
with Israel. However, it is surprising that questioning the loyalty of such
policymakers is suppressed in the media discourse. In many cases, the
neocons demonstrate clear contradictions between their "Israel first"
proclivities and their presumed loyalty to the United States - the country
currently employing them.

Jeffrey St. Clair
provides a lucid account of the Israeli bombing of the USS Liberty - a
sordid chapter that involved the strafing of the survivors in their
lifeboats. St. Clair examines how this vile episode was kept off the
political agenda and why Israel was never condemned. It may come as a
surprise to most Americans that The White House and the Pentagon connived to
bury this story. This episode notwithstanding, US arms shipments and
economic assistance to Israel started in earnest shortly afterwards.

This book is important
for all those concerned with peace and justice in the Middle East, and those
wanting to change the US foreign policy agenda. It is also important for
those seeking to understand the American political system and find ways of
influencing it. The book addresses an issue that has caused much anxiety in
the past. A discussion of "anti-Semitism" is important, to undo the
pernicious political effects of its usage as a slur; the book also provides
a basis for countering the slur. Finally, the book also surveys a range of
important taboo topics in American discourse. Knowing what issues are
sensitive, and why, should spur an opening up of the debate -- perhaps the
greatest value of this book. The supporters of Israel may also want to read
the book because it highlights an unintended effect of their attempts to
block debate. That is, overuse of the anti-Semitic slur has devalued the
coin, reducing its worth to that of crying wolf.

Many of the essays in
this book have appeared on the
CounterPunch
website - an important online magazine which is edited by the editors of
this book. Cockburn, St. Clair and the other authors must be commended for
addressing this important topic with this collection of excellent essays.
Unfortunately, criticism of Israel is still a taboo topic, and the first
ones to raise questions will probably attract a significant amount of abuse.
One must remember this when appreciating the courage of those who have
produced this important book.