Okay. As I anticipated, you completely missed the point of my question. It is an oft used tactic of the left to use anecdotal information to undermine or completely abrogate a social, moral or traditional standard or institution.

So.....that STRAIGHT father who bit out and ate his little sons eyeball..... that is not considered a perversion of morality or deviant to you...

Did I make that assertion? Please!

...you cant possibly say that every heterosexual couple is not deviant or perverted as well,...

Where did I say that? In all of human history, in every society, in every group or subgroup of people from every walk of life, there have been immoral, detestable, evil things perpetrated regardless of laws and moral standards. Why destroy the standard and make exceptions for one deviant lifestyle choice because of examples of decent behavior in a specific circumstance?

And dont try to say that moral gay couple is an oxymoron..... there are lots of good gay people out there.

Ah, and here is where we have issues. So, despite your objections, I will say it if you don't mind. I believe that homosexuality is immoral. It is an utterly deviant lifestyle choice. Period. Regardless how moral they are in other areas of their lives, they are living an utterly immoral lifestyle.

So, do I want my moral standards, standards and institutions that have been successful models of human decency, development and convention actively impugned and dismantled by a minority of immoral people? This is the goal of the gay community and their advocates. Their lifestyle, if accepted as the norm, only leads to further destruction of our society. I refuse to have this shoved down my throat!

Nope...I didn’t misunderstand your question or your assertion, and I see your point. And no, I am not a lefty.

What I am saying is...... there are PLENTY of children out there who are being raised by straight parents who have no business pro-creating..... these children themselves will grow up to be criminals, liars, wife beaters, hell...they might even be President!

you talk about norms and exceptions. So....what is the norm of a 16 yo pregnant girl? I would say that she is unemployed, on welfare, uneducated, and not exactly sure who the father is. So should we change our perceptions for the norm, or the exception?

I am not talking about changing your moral code. I am saying that those children, or children in foster homes with no future, or orphans.....would be better off living with a gay couple with good jobs and loving homes. Let’s just talk about THOSE children, who have no other place to go....can you honestly say that you would rather have them bounced from foster home to foster home, instead of living a stable life with a gay couple (who has been properly background checked and followed up upon)?

what other solutions do you have for these kids? Please fix our foster care system, no one else has.