Transcription

1 Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service ANSI-3035 Managing Bermudagrass Pasture to Reduce Winter Hay Feeding in Beef Cattle Operations David Lalman Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Animal Science Bob Woods NE District Area Agronomist Kent Barnes NE District Area Livestock Specialist Daren Redfearn Extension Forage and Pasture Management Specialist, Plant and Soil Sciences Chuck Coffey Noble Foundation Senior Pasture and Range Consultant A large proportion of cow-calf enterprise costs are associated with feeding harvested forages from November through April. By extending grazing through late fall and early winter, producers can reduce the amount of harvested forage that is needed to maintain beef cows. One management practice that can be utilized to achieve this goal is late-summer fertilization of bermudagrass forage with the intent of stockpiling the forage regrowth for fall or winter grazing. Bermudagrass is highly responsive to late summer precipitation. Figure 1 shows the 30-year average monthly precipitation for Okmulgee County, which is located in East Central Oklahoma. This bimodal pattern of rainfall is ideal to enhance late summer and fall bermudagrass forage growth. The OSU Cattle and Forages Initiative Team and specialists at the Noble Foundation, have conducted research to investigate various management aspects of stockpiling and grazing bermudagrass pastures. In this bulletin, results from two series of experiments will be summarized. The first series of experiments were focused on the use of managed stockpiled bermudagrass forage in beef cow enterprises; the second Figure 1. Mean monthly precipitation for Okmulgee County, OK. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets are also available on our website at: series addressed the use of stockpiled bermudagrass forage in stocker cattle enterprises. Results of additional field trials conducted throughout Oklahoma will also be summarized. Series 1: Beef Cows Pasture Preparation and Fertility For this discussion, the concept of stockpiling does NOT include stockpiling forage before the month of August for winter grazing. When forage is stockpiled earlier in the spring or summer and grazing is delayed until the winter, forage quality is extremely low, resulting in poor animal performance or excessive feed costs. Therefore, pastures should be managed to remove (graze, clip, or hay) existing forage by mid to late August. Depending on N available in the soil, producers commonly apply 50 to 100 pounds of actual N per acre during late August. Grazing should be deferred until sometime in October or early November. Grazing initiation will need to be flexible depending on timing of fall precipitation, fall temperatures and the first killing frost. Forage Production Early fall-forage accumulation has been variable, with an average of 2,750 pounds per acre (see Table 1). For example, forage production in 1999, was low with an average of just over 1,600 pounds. Low forage production was due to cool weather during September and lack of moisture during October. During the fall of 1998, forage production was 1,881 pounds in Stillwater when the first substantial rainfall was delayed until late September. Maximum forage production was 4,058 pounds at the Eastern Research Station in Haskell where greater rainfall was available in early September. During the fall of 1998, Noble Foundation forage specialists recorded 4,261 pounds of forage accumulation at the Noble Foundation s Red River Farm, south of Burneyville, OK. In this work, 60 pounds of N was applied in early August. During that year, 100 pounds of N was applied in the spring and, undoubtedly, some of this carried over to the fall due to low spring and summer forage production. Nitrogen response is better on sites that have a history of nitrogen applications and good fertility management. Numerous research and demonstration projects have been conducted throughout Northeast Oklahoma. In this work, we have found that 50 to 100 pounds of fall nitrogen produces anywhere from 1,500 to 2,500 pounds of forage, depend- Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State University

2 Table 1. Forage production and harvest efficiency. Fall forage N application accumulation, Harvest Location Year rate, lbs/acre lbs/acre efficiency, % Haskell Stillwater Haskell Stillwater Burneyville Haskell Stillwater Figure 2. Effect of late summer N fertilization on fall forage accumulation. ing on time of application, as well as timing and amount of precipitation. This work was conducted primarily on sites that had not historically been fertilized with nitrogen. Grazing Management It is recommended that access to forage be controlled with rotational or strip-grazing as much as possible. These grazing practices will reduce waste and further extend the grazing period. Greater grazing intensity, coupled with faster cattle movement, should result in improved harvest efficiency, although this issue has not yet been studied in the context of stockpiled bermudagrass forage. Forage allowance can be controlled with a rotational system, using permanent fence, or by utilizing temporary electrical fencing to strip-graze the pastures. In either case, a high stocking density should be used. Allowing access to the entire pasture will result in wasted forage. Continuous grazing will result in excellent cattle performance early, followed by weight loss by the end of the period. Cattle consume the high-quality leafy material at the top of the plant first, resulting in low-quality stems available at the end of the period. Recommended harvest efficiency is around 60 percent, plus or minus 5 percent. For example if grazing is managed to utilize 60 percet of the 3,000 pounds of available forage, the cows would be allowed to harvest 1,800 pounds of forage per acre. Greater harvest efficiency should result in lower animal performance. On average, one acre should provide around 60 days of grazing for a moderately-sized cow. If cool-season pasture is available for winter grazing, utilize stockpiled bermudagrass first, preferrably by the end of December. If native pasture is available for winter grazing, plan on spending no more than 100 days utilizing the stockpiled bermudagrass, unless the winter is exceptionally mild. These rules of thumb should be adjusted based on location in the state, (shorter grazing window in the southeast due to greater precipitation and thus, forage deterioration). For several years, Noble Foundation Specialists wintered cows with stockpiled bermudagrass through March at the Noble Foundation s pasture demonstration farm. In this case, recognize that greater protein and energy supplementation may be required compared to shorter grazing programs. Forage Quality and Supplementation If the stockpiled forage is grown during late August, September, and October, forage quality; especially protein content, is usually adequate for gestating beef cows through November. Table 2 includes chemical composition of forage samples that were collected from grazing animals fitted with esophageal cannulas. This data suggests that fall fertilized bermudagrass may contain adequate protein through February to meet the needs of a gestating cow. It was apparent that during both of these studies, cool season annual grasses began to make up a small percentage of the grazed forage during the month of February. Consequently, some of the higher protein concentration represents the growth of those cool-season annual grasses. In the grazing trials conducted at OSU, supplementation during November gave no advantage over non-supplemented animals (Table 3). After November, it appeared that there Table 2. Chemical composition of grazed forage samples at Stillwater, percent of dry matter a. Sample Date Protein ADIN NDF ADF TDN Nov Dec Jan Feb Nov Dec Jan Feb a ADIN = acid detergent insoluble nitrogen, NDF = neutral detergent fiber, ADF = acid detergent fiber, TDN = total digestible nutrients. Table 3. Cow weight change (pounds) by year and supplement type. a Year Supplement Treatment and Period Control 12.5% CP 25% CP 37.5% CP Day Day Day Day a Pooled data from Stillwater and Haskell. ANSI

3 was little difference in animal performance when cows were supplemented with 2 pounds per day of 12.5, 25, or 37.5 percent protein feed. Based on this data, we suggest beginning supplementing two pounds of 14 percent to 25 percent protein feed in early December, and continuing through the program. The 25 percent protein feed is recommended if the stockpiling period begins earlier in August and/or during winters when forage rapidly deteriorates due to high precipitation. Feed can be delivered on a 3- or 4-days-per-week basis. Economics A logical and very important question is: How does the stockpiling system compare to feeding hay or utilizing some other standing forage resource during the same period? To address this question, during both years of the experiment described above, a group of 20 cows grazed stockpiled native tallgrass prairie (SNP) at a stocking rate of 1 cow to 3 acres. The native pastures had not been grazed through the spring or summer. Cows in this group were supplemented with 2 pounds per day of 38 percent protein feed, consisting primarily of cottonseed meal. Initial and final weights and condition scores were recorded for each group of cows for a total of 79 days in year 1 and 90 days in year 2. Averaged across both years, there was no difference in cow weight or condition score change during this period. An economic analysis was conducted to compare costs for 5 different systems for a 100-day period: 1. Stockpiled native pasture and 38 percent protein supplement (NP). 2. Stockpiled native pasture providing 75 percent forage dry matter, 38 percent protein, and hay supplement providing 25 percent forage dry matter (75/25). 3. Stockpiled native pasture providing 50 percent forage dry matter, 38 percent protein supplement, and hay providing 50 percent forage dry matter (50/50). 4. Hay feeding alone (no supplement required). 5. Stockpiled bermudagrass pasture and 25 percent protein supplement. In each of these comparisons, it was assumed that cow weight and body condition change would not be significantly different. Additional assumptions and costs were as follows: Bermudagrass pasture rental rate was $18 annually and rental costs were allocated to 120 days of summer grazing and 90 days of fall/winter grazing (Oct. 24 through Jan. 22). Fall forage accumulation was 2,755 pounds per acre, stocking rate was 1.42 acres per cow, and harvest efficiency was 60 percent. Fall nitrogen fertilizer application was 50 pounds per acre with a cost of $28.50 per acre. Total cost for the stockpiled bermudagrass pasture was $36.21 per acre for the 90-day period. Medium protein range cubes (25 percent crude protein) were priced at $270 per ton and fed for the last 70 days of the 90-day period. Native pasture rent was $13 per acre with an annual stocking rate of 10 acres per cow. High protein range cubes were priced at $350 per ton and were fed the duration of the 90-day period. Harvest efficiency of the native pasture was assumed to be 30 percent and initial availability of native forage was assumed to be 3,250 lb per acre. Grass hay used in the comparisons contained 9 percent protein and 54 percent TDN, and would be adequate to meet a gestating cow s protein and energy needs when fed alone. Table 4. Estimated cost of different feeding systems. System Cost per day Total cost 90 days a Native pasture and 38% protein supplement $.58 $52.30 Native pasture, 38% protein and hay supplement (75/25) $.66 $59.41 Native pasture, 38% protein supplement and hay feeding (50/50) $.74 $66.52 Hay feeding alone $.93 $80.73 Stockpiled bermudagrass and 25% protein supplement $.78 $ days Short term grazing of stockpiled bermudagrass (60 days) $.77 $46.06 a October 24 through January 22. Hay feeding waste was calculated as 15 percent above total pounds of hay fed. Hay was priced at $60 per ton. When hay replaced native pasture forage intake, the amount of supplement fed was prorated accordingly. For example, when hay was supplemented at 25 percent total forage intake, total pounds of protein supplement was also reduced by 25 percent. In the native pasture and hay feeding scenario, hay replaced 50 percent native pasture forage intake and 50 percent of the protein supplement. Costs were also calculated assuming that some producers might want to consider utilizing all of the stockpiled bermudagrass pasture in a shorter time period using a heavier stocking rate. For this scenario, a 60-day grazing period was used with a stocking rate of.94 acres per cow and 2 pounds of 25 percent protein feed during the last 50 days. Total period and daily cost comparisons are given in Table 4. Obviously, costs of each of these systems will be sensitive to forage availability at the beginning of the fall/winter grazing period, pasture rental cost, feed prices, fertilizer, hay price, and quality, as well as various other factors. It is interesting to note that the native pasture with supplement and no hay fed is still the lowest cost wintering system for the 100-day period. However, given the values used in this example, it does appear that grazing fertilized, stockpiled bermudagrass is a viable and economical alternative to feeding hay. Said another way, grazing stockpiled, fertilized bermudagrass pasture can reduce the length of the expensive hay feeding season and thereby, reduce costs of wintering beef cows. Series 2: Stocker Cattle Many producers wean calves or purchase weaned calves during the fall months of the year. Stockpiled, fertilized bermudagrass pasture could provide an alternative grazing system or growing program for beef calves. Therefore, this experiment was conducted to determine a) if producers could ANSI

4 expect performance of growing cattle to be different when allowed to graze stockpiled bermudagrass pasture, as compared to being fed hay during the same period, and 2) to determine if supplementation of growing cattle receiving either type of forage is necessary and (or) economical. Methods This experiment was conducted over a three year period at the Noble Foundation s Pasture Demonstration Farm, located west of Ardmore, OK. Approximately 200 steers were purchased during August each year. Processing upon arrival included mass medication, individual identification, weighing, castration, dehorning, branding, deworming, vaccination for clostridial and bovine respiratory diseases, and implanting. The cattle were fed hay and 2 pounds per head per day of a 14 percent CP supplement during the 30-day receiving period. Steers were randomly allotted to twelve experimental groups (four treatment groups with three replications each). Treatments included the main effects of supplement and forage source. Levels of supplement included no supplement (NS) or 4 lb per day of a commercial pelleted feed (14 percent CP) (SUP). Forage sources included bermudagrass hay (HAY) or fall fertilized bermudagrass pasture (PAS). Treatments were initiated on September 16, September 17, and September 19 and terminated on December 2, December 15, and December 2 in 2002, 2003, and 2004, resulting in experimental periods of 77, 89, and 74 days, respectively. Pastures were grazed during May, June, July, and August each year to insure a maximum of approximately 3,000 lb per acre of residual forage was available at the time of latesummer fertilization. During mid-august each year, pastures were fertilized with 50 lb of actual N per acre. Six groups of HAY-fed cattle were randomly assigned to six drylot pens with three receiving SUP and three receiving NS. Hay was sampled prior to feeding and samples were composited before being submitted to a commercial laboratory for determination of crude protein (CP) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) concentrations. Acid detergent fiber concentration has been shown to be negatively correlated to digestibility of forage in ruminant animals. The PAS groups were turned out to graze in six pastures with three receiving NS and three receiving SUP. The PAS groups were rotated through the six pastures on a weekly basis to minimize the possibility of pasture effects on performance. Clip samples were collected weekly to determine forage availability and subsamples of the clipped forage were dried, ground and submitted to the commercial laboratory for chemical analysis. Average forage availability and chemical composition within each month are presented. Results and Discussion Average CP and ADF concentration of hay fed is shown in Table 5 and fertilized, stockpiled bermudagrass forage CP and ADF concentrations are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. Hay nutritive value was similar during each year of the experiment and did not differ substantially from the CP concentration of the grazed forage. Protein concentration of the stockpiled forage, averaged within one month, ranged from 13.6 to 9 percent. A 500- to 600-pound steer gaining 2 pounds per day has a dietary CP requirement of 12 to 13 percent. Consequently, at times, the stockpiled, fertilized forage would Table 5. Average crude protein and acid detergent fiber concentration of bermudagrass hay by year, DM basis. Year Crude Protein, % ADF, % CP, % of DM Figure 3. Stockpiled bermudagrass protein concentration. ADF, % of DM Figure 4. Stockpiled bermudagrass ADF concentration. Lb DM/Acre Sep Oct Nov Dec Sep Oct Nov Dec Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 5. Stockpiled bermudagrass forage availability, lb/acre. have had adequate protein to meet the dietary requirement, while weight gain would have been limited by forage protein concentration at other times. In general, ADF concentration in the stockpiled forage increased over time, suggesting that forage digestibility would have limited steers growth rate to a greater extent later in the experiment. Average initial forage availability was greater than that of the experiments presented in the previous section and was quite variable, ranging from 7,555 to 4,850 pounds per acre (Figure 5). There could be several reasons for higher forage availability in these experiments, although the most likely difference is that less of the summer-grown forage was removed by grazing before late-summer fertilization. ANSI

5 Table 6. Effects of fall backgrounding forage source and supplementation on performance of stocker steers during backgrounding and wheat pasture grazing. Not Stockpiled Supple- Supple- Item Bermudagrass Hay mented mented SE No. of steers No. of pasture groups (3 yr) Weight, lb Mid-Sep Mid-Oct 521 a 506 b 507 a 520 b 3 Mid-Nov a 555 b 7 Dec a 577 b 7 ADG, lb Pd1 1.8 a 1.51 b 1.4 a 1.9 b.10 Pd a 1.12 b.19 Pd a.90 b.20 Cumulative a 1.40 b.07 a,b Means within a treatment with uncommon superscripts are different (P<.05). Forage availability declined over time, as would be expected (Figure 5). Table 6 shows the effects of fall backgrounding forage source and supplementation on the performance of stocker steers. There was no forage source by supplement treatment interaction. In other words, steers responded the same to supplementation, regardless of the type of forage they were grazing. During the initial 28-day period, the PAS steers gained at a faster rate compared to the HAY steers. However, performance during the subsequent periods was similar between the two forage sources. As a result, final weight and cumulative ADG was similar among the two forage sources. Steers receiving SUP outperformed NS steers during each weigh period. In fact, both forage sources provided only a maintenance level of nutrient intake in the absence of supplement during the latter two weigh periods. Supplement efficiency (pound of supplement per pound of additional weight gain) was 5.4. Consequently, if value of additional weight gain was $.60, $.80, or $1.00 per pound, the breakeven value of the supplement would be $222.40, $296.29, and $370.37, respectively. When cost of similar feed supplements is less expensive than these values, the supplementation program would be profitable. However, additional research is necessary to determine whether additional weight gain due to supplementation during the backgrounding period is lost during the winter grazing period. In conclusion, with the possible exception of extreme environmental conditions, producers should expect similar performance of growing cattle grazing fertilized, stockpiled bermudagrass pasture compared to cattle consuming bermudagrass hay. Therefore, fertilizer, labor, and hay purchase price or hay harvesting costs are the primary considerations when evaluating this management option. As shown in the first series of experiments, the cost of fertilized, stockpiled bermudagrass forage should be less than that of harvested forage in most years. However, this will not always be the case as forage production (and therefore cost per unit of forage produced) is highly variable and highly dependent on late-summer and fall precipitation. ANSI

6 The Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Bringing the University to You! The Cooperative Extension Service is the largest, most successful informal educational organization in the world. It is a nationwide system funded and guided by a partnership of federal, state, and local governments that delivers information to help people help themselves through the land-grant university system. Extension carries out programs in the broad categories of agriculture, natural resources and environment; family and consumer sciences; 4-H and other youth; and community resource development. Extension staff members live and work among the people they serve to help stimulate and educate Americans to plan ahead and cope with their problems. Some characteristics of the Cooperative Extension system are: The federal, state, and local governments cooperatively share in its financial support and program direction. It is administered by the land-grant university as designated by the state legislature through an Extension director. Extension programs are nonpolitical, objective, and research-based information. It provides practical, problem-oriented education for people of all ages. It is designated to take the knowledge of the university to those persons who do not or cannot participate in the formal classroom instruction of the university. It utilizes research from university, government, and other sources to help people make their own decisions. More than a million volunteers help multiply the impact of the Extension professional staff. It dispenses no funds to the public. It is not a regulatory agency, but it does inform people of regulations and of their options in meeting them. Local programs are developed and carried out in full recognition of national problems and goals. The Extension staff educates people through personal contacts, meetings, demonstrations, and the mass media. Extension has the built-in flexibility to adjust its programs and subject matter to meet new needs. Activities shift from year to year as citizen groups and Extension workers close to the problems advise changes. Oklahoma State University, in compliance with Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order as amended, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and other federal laws and regulations, does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, age, religion, disability, or status as a veteran in any of its policies, practices, or procedures. This includes but is not limited to admissions, employment, financial aid, and educational services. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Robert E. Whitson, Director of Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma. This publication is printed and issued by Oklahoma State University as authorized by the Vice President, Dean, and Director of the Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources and has been prepared and distributed at a cost of 42 cents per copy GH/TE. ANSI

Chapter 9 Keys to Success in Stocker Programs There are several economic advantages to retaining raised calves or purchasing calves and selling them later in groups at heavier weights. These stocker (growing

Forage Value Chapter 2 Forage Value 2 Livestock producers in the western United States, including Oregon, are at an economic disadvantage relative to those in some other regions in North America because

PRODUCING WHEY SILAGE FOR GROWING AND FINISHING CATTLE D.R. ZoBell and W. C. Burrell October 2002 AG 514 INTRODUCTION Roughage is the principal component of most cattle diets and as such can greatly influence

Finding alternatives to ammonium nitrate as a nitrogen source for tall fescue pastures Robert L. Kallenbach and Matt D. Massie Division of Plant Sciences and the Southwest Research and Education Center

A l a b a m a A & M a n d A u b u r n U n i v e r s i t i e s ANR-60 Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle Information and recommendations in this publication are based on the 7th and most recent edition

Protein and Energy Supplementation to Beef Cows Grazing New Mexico Rangelands Cooperative Extension Service Circular 564 College of Agriculture and Home Economics CONTENTS General ruminant nutrition...

Nutrient Requirements for Beef Cattle Ed Rayburn, Extension Specialist September 2013 Beef cattle production, using pasture and hay crops, is a major agricultural enterprise in West Virginia. It enables

HLA-6600 Turfgrass Management of Bermudagrass Football Fields Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Dennis Martin Extension Turfgrass Specialist The first step in developing a turfgrass management program

T ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime producers. No matter what size operation, good pasture management

OATS AS A FEED FOR BEEF CATTLE Stephen Boyles, The Ohio State Univeristy Ladon Johnson, North Dakota State University Oats is lower in energy and more bulky than other common feed grains since it threshes

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING Jimmy C. Henning A good rotational grazing system begins with a forage system that allows the maximum number of grazing days per year with forages that are

DETERMINING YOUR STOCKING RATE Mindy Pratt and G. Allen Rasmussen Range Management Fact Sheet May 2001 NR/RM/04 To determine how many animals your land will support (stocking rate), you need to know two

DECEMBER 2006 PRIMEFACT 323 (REPLACES AGNOTE DPI-428) Pasture assessment and livestock production Alan Bell Former Technical Specialist (Temperate Grazing Systems) This Primefact was compiled in part from

Managing for Today s Cattle Market and Beyond March 2002 The Costs of Raising Replacement Heifers and the Value of a Purchased Versus Raised Replacement By Dillon M. Feuz, University of Nebraska Numerous

Matching nutritional requirements of gestating cows from October to April with various extended grazing practices Greg Penner, PhD Associate Professor and Centennial Enhancement Chair in Ruminant Nutritional

Iowa Farm Outlook 0BDepartment of Economics November 2016 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info. 2079 Pasture and Range Conditions and Prices: A Year in Review This year the U.S. has enjoyed favorable pasture and range

The A to Z of Meat Goat Production Russell Ramsey, Regional Agriculture Business Management Specialist, University of Missouri Extension SARE National Conference-August 15-17, 17, 2006 Oconomowoc, Wisconsin

B-6053 04-01 Crop Nutrient Needs in South and Southwest Texas Charles Stichler and Mark McFarland* Crop fertilization is not an exact science. The soil is a dynamic, changing, and complex mixture of organic

What is Nitrite Toxicity? Georgia Cattleman, June 2002 John Andrae, Forage Extension Specialist Many beef producers are familiar with high nitrates in forages and their toxic effects in cattle. Probably

Ruminant Preference for Bermudagrass Hay With and Without Exposure to Swine Lagoon Effluent North Carolina Cooperative Extension North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin 339 November

A L A B A M A A & M A N D A U B U R N U N I V E R S I T I E S ANR-812 Nutrient Requirements of Sheep and Goats Feed, whether purchased or produced on the farm, makes up a large part of the expenses incurred

Guidance for Calculating Ruminant Feed and Forage Intake is one of a range AWA technical papers designed to provide practical advice and support to farmers. For more information, visit www.animalwelfareapproved.org

Page 1 Your Hay Test and Your Horse How to Decipher the Lab Report and Tell What it Means Buying hay for your horse can be a challenge whether you buy it a few bales at a time or buy a year s supply as

Pasture Forage Quality in West Virginia WVU Pasture Quality Program Team 1 December 2003 Cattle and sheep need to obtain most of their nutrients from forage, particularly pasture, if they are to be fed

Contacts: Matt Poore, Science, 919.515.7798 Jim Turner, Science, 828.246.4466 North Carolina Cooperative Extension College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North Carolina State University or contact your

October 2012 Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage Insurance: A Risk Management Tool for Hay and Livestock Producers Monte Vandeveer, Otoe County Extension Educator University of Nebraska-Lincoln Institute of

Facts on alternative fibre sources When pasture is limited and supplies of fodder are reduced, you may be forced to consider using alternative fibre options which you may not have used before. Many alternative

Managing Financial and Market Risk Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock Let s talk about risk It is NOT uncertainty! It is the negative outcome associated with an unforeseen event. Good risk managers

Department of Animal Science FEEDING THE DAIRY COW DURING LACTATION Dairy Cattle Production 342-450A Page 1 of 8 Feeding the Dairy Cow during Lactation There are main stages in the lactation cycle of the

Managing for Today s Cattle Market and Beyond Managing Cow-Calf Production Costs: What To Do Before The Money Runs Out By J. Walter Prevatt, Auburn University Cow-calf producers are a lot like jet pilots.

The True Cost of Hay by Erin Jenkins Student Intern 2013 August 2013 Introduction It is no secret that feed costs are a huge addition to livestock farm expenditures, and if you feed hay one of the main

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist The increasing acreage of hops in the Northeast has prompted the need for fertility guidelines

Cooperative Extension HOW MANY ANIMALS CAN I GRAZE ON MY PASTURE? DETERMINING CARRYING CAPACITY ON SMALL LAND TRACTS Introduction Many landowners are interested in purchasing horses and other livestock

PNW 666 Price Indices for Estimating Cattle Prices in the Pacific Northwest C. Wilson Gray Introduction The history of the cattle industry since statistics were first collected in 1865 has been cyclical.

61 Grouping to Increase Milk Yield and Decrease Feed Costs Michael S. Allen 1 Department of Animal Science Michigan State University Abstract There are many advantages of grouping cows to optimize their