It would appear that some conservatives just don't get it.
They either labor under the misapprehension that we care about
their attempts to debate, or they simply throw insults at
us. And yet still they fail to realize that their carefully
crafted, well thought out, well-argued prose ("fuck yu,
librals!") will end up here, in the hate mailbag. Apparently
it is even de rigeur amongst conservatives to claim
that appearing in the hate mailbag is some kind of "badge
of honor." Well, okay. If you really want literally thousands
of people from all over the world to have a good laugh at
your witless expense, that's fine by us. Thanks for the free
content!

These
are all completely real. E-mail addresses and last names have
been removed (well, the ones that aren't fake), but we have
NOT edited them for content, grammar, or spelling.

If Reagan
was so bad, why did he get 525 electoral votes? Why did the
economy turn up at the end of Bush senior's term? Why did
the economy turn down at the end of Clinton's term? Why are
so many things named after Reagan? Why is nobody nameing things
after Clinton? (except the guy's own library?) Are all (or
any) of Stossel's facts inaccurate? Do Democrats think they
can spend our money better than we can? Why did CNN's poll
rank Reagan #1 president of all time? Wasnt Clinton impeached?
Do you have any real answers? Or are you just gonna call me
an idiot too?

You have
the audacity to write about Bush! You liberals are masters
at dumbing down Americans and it shows. I'm sure you don't
know it, but in my subject line quoted from your article,
the word "you" is incorrect. What can you expect from stupid
people though? I will send that article to my friends.

DU
RESPONDS: Thanks for bringing that message board
typo to our attention, Betty. Please let us know what your
friends think of this egregious error, won't you? If you really
have any friends, that is.

As a GOPMobster
its refreshing to find Left-Wing Extremists websites to provoke
responses from the Illiterate Left so to expose, for the youth
you have corrupted into believeing, what the Party of Sheep
really represents!Keep it up....

DU
RESPONDS:Hmmm... I'd be extremely careful
throwing around accusations of illiteracy if I were you, Mr.
Sixpak.

The NEW
YORK TIMES article of Sunday July 15th, 2001 states that there
was no evidence of fraud on the part of the Bush campaign
or the Republicans in FL last November (I won't speak for
the DemRats). If even this left wing socialist rag says that
don't you think it's time to move on?

DU
RESPONDS: Well, Mr. "Fur Hole," I
think you might be right. Now that our commie puppetmaster
the New York Times has reported that overseas military ballots
which were cast after election day were illegally counted
in Republican but not Democratic counties, and that some people
cast multiple ballots, and that some overseas ballots arrived
with U.S. postmarks, and that some overseas ballots didn't
have postmarks or signatures, and that the Pentagon handed
out private email addresses to GOP operatives, and that Katherine
Harris had a GOP "war room" set up in her office...
yep, there's nothing to see here. I think we'll just shut
up and never mention it again.

Just
Both Sides Of The Facts, Ma'amFrom:
----@----------.comDate: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 02:52:55 -0400To: mail@democraticunderground.com Subject: This Site

Because
it shows just how much you don't know about what is going
on with our country, And just how one sided you are. If you
are going to report lies atleast show both sides of the facts(and
by what we have seen you have none.)

DU
RESPONDS: What do you mean, one-sided? We're
at LEAST as fair and balanced as Fox News!

You might
be a Republican if you support censorship? What are you trying
to fool us or are you that fucking retarded? Joe Lieberman
is all I have to say in response to that. Imagine if Gore
actually won the election? You would have to show an ID to
play a video game at an arcade... R rated movies would be
treated like NC-17 movies ... certain CDs would be banned.
If that commie Gore won that election, which contrary to your
delusions he didn't, I would probably be typing this message
from my new home in Canada. Bush has accomplished more in
his first 6 months than Clinton did in his entire Presidency
... all the media can do to make Bush look bad is say he looks
like a monkey. Clinton was one of the worst Presidents we
have ever had ... and had a 70% approval rating at the end
of his 2nd term! Bush has a 52-58% approval rating depending
who you ask ... at the same point in his first term Clinton's
was around 40%... they're saying Bush is a failure because
only a slight MAJORITY of his constituents in a country where
the media is so far left it makes me puke (they actually expect
me to believe Bush is far-right) approves of him. I hope you
liberal cowards post my message so my rant wasn't typed in
vain....

DU
RESPONDS:Curse you, commie, socialist,
Democrap liberal media, for constantly saying that Bush looks
like a monkey. Yeah, I'm talking to you Dan Rather. Cut it
out with the monkey name-calling, okay? I've seen you doing
it, you liberal swine. And the rest of you rotten Stalinist
news media better stop doing it too. These constant prime-time
news reports about Bush looking like a monkey had better stop
right now. And fancy telling us that just because Bill Clinton
had a 70% approval rating, people must have thought he was
a good president. You leftist rascals.

Has DU ever
heard of the Electoral College ? It was created to prevent
exactly the type of "victory" you would have liked. Without
it, a small group of populous states ( like NY, CA, IL ) could
determine the outcome of the election. Hell, in such a system
why bother campaigning in swing states like MO,IA,GA,KY,etc.
Without broad appeal, you cannot become president. Thank God
the founding fathers had more sense than you. You rant in
a reply words to the effect, "Aren't you bothered that the
president was elected by a minority of the country?" What
WOULD bother me is if the winner of a minority of the states'
popular vote ( I believe Gore won only 21 of 50 states ) became
president. You'll find that there has NEVER been a case where
the loser of the EC has become president. Further, doesn't
it bother you that Gore lost his own state, lost WV ( it's
more pathetic to lose WV as a Dem than to lose your own state
!!! ) and lost NH ( right in the heart of leftist New England
) ? A win in any ONE of those states would have given Gore
the presidency !!!!! Perhaps you should direct your anger
at Al Gore and his abysmal campaign.

By the way,
a small group of racist, homophobic idiots that write you
does not represent the vast majority of Republicans just like
a bunch of robotic morons who can't punch a ballet does not
represent the Democratic Party as a whole.

Jim ---------

"Oh baby,
the adults are back in charge..."

DU
RESPONDS:Phew, you're right there. Thank
God some of us Democrats know how to punch a ballet. You should
have been there the other week when Swan Lake started chatting
up my girlfriend. POW! Went down like a sack of potatoes.

loser,loser,loser,oser,loser,lo
ser,loser,loser,loser,loser,los er,loser,loser,loser,loser....oh
yeah, you know Chris Lahane? Loser,loser,loser,loser,loser,l
oser,loser,loser. See you in 2002, a Florida voter who CAN
vote for the candidate I want elected! One more thing: Rush
Limbaugh is a big, fat, RICH idiot!!!!!!!

they seriously
undermine your message, and probably make most of you socially
aware readers cringe, and will reduce your readership - i
am too embarrassed to forward this to my friends, even though
they would value (mot of) your work.

DU
RESPONDS: You make a good point, and you are
right, of course. That's why in future we shall not be referring
to Ms. Katherine Harris as a "cow" or a "whore."
We shall instead be using the words, "skank" and
"slut." Thank you.