Why did Andrea Mears escape with just a mere misdemeanor charge after assaulting a man?

A crazed woman, Andrea Mears has become the focus of a youtube video that has gone viral (and now removed) in which the Westbrook, Connecticut,23 year old woman is seen assaulting a man (liveleaks) since identified as 17 year old Austin Haughwoutafter he innocently chose to fly a drone at Hammonasset Beach in the city of Madison.

During the video, which was filmed on an iPhone on May 12, Andrea Mears can be seen violently knocking and beating Haughwout as he took to flying his drone. The reason for her anger tells the woman, she believes Haughwout is a pervert who has sought to take images of women sunbathing on the beach where the incident took place.

Yet whilst the woman decries that Austin Haughwout is a pervert (his youtube account would show innocuous material) at no point does he fight back, instead as the woman calls the police it is her who in fact will be taken into custody.

Screams the woman into the phone whilst on the line with cops: ‘He’s taking pictures of people on the beach, with a, with a helicopter plane,’

Andrea Mears then gets off the phone and precedes to then drag the man to the ground as he takes to gathering his equipment.

‘You’re assaulting me you a**wipe,‘ yells the man whilst being pummeled by the belligerent woman.

‘Yeah! That’s what you get you little pervert,’ Mears growls from off camera overs sounds of landed punches and grinding sand.

‘You wanna take pictures?’ she snarls. ‘Yeah. You’re gonna see how it feels when the police come.’

She continues to smack Haughwout before telling him to let go of her.

‘If you weren’t assaulting me, I wouldn’t be touching you,’ he says.

Mears then screams: ‘Then maybe you shouldn’t be taking pictures of people on the beach! I’m gonna beat your a** you little m*****f*****!’

While it is unclear what occurred in the moments before Austin Haughwout began recording the bizarre incident, his YouTube account–which also hosts an edited version of the video–features several other seemingly innocent videos taken on the beach with the drone.

It should also be notedthatFederal Aviation Administration has no strict laws regarding the use of flying devices, often leaving citizens and law enforcement alike unclear about what is legal and not.

Andrea Mears would summarily be charged with third degree assault and disruption of peace, which amounts to merely misdemeanor raps after cops viewed the content of the above video.

Reflects everyjoe: If this was a man assaulting a woman, he’d be thrown in jail. Shouldn’t the same thing apply to her?

The problem: That’s perfectly legal. She went on some sort of feminist, vigilantist rampage without any cause.

What do you think?

And then there was this one reflection on the web that made me wonder:

Every store, stoplight, highway, and most major cities have cameras that watch you without your consent…you are in public. You may be photographed without it being illegal. Even if you don’t agree with it, when you mess with someone else’s property or worse, assault them! You should have been beaten before the cops you called arrest you

This was more in response to those who would be carrying out the ” If not, just don’t be surprised when you find yourself mocked and ridiculed publicly more and more in the coming years.” and not you necessarily.

Reading your prolific posts, you really are a female-hater. Elliott Rodger did ONE good thing. He awakened a sleeping giant in his Manifesto, mentioning all those female-hating websites full of Incels (Involuntary Celebates) who think they shuld be able to take any woman they choose (by force if necessary) and who HATE that we women CHOOSE who to be with (unless forced.). In all of the animal kingdom, it is this way, not just humans. The female CHOOSES the one she will mate with. Who she will accept to attain prime offspring. From mammals, to fish, to insects.

Now we KNOW what to watch out for. There are certain phrases & buzzwords, certain mind-sets of all those men. You fit the profile. And you know what? Women can SMELL men like you. Y’all have a certain odor of desperation about you.

That’s the level of logic you are using; next time try something substantive, use your brain to craft an argument and then post it, don’t post your emotional nonsense the way you did, it has zero value and only makes my point further.

Hmm, looks like someone failed 4th grade reading comprehension. If both the KKK and a church charity advocate for safe neighborhoods, that doesn’t mean the church charity is evil (like the KKK).

So, now let me spoon feed you through my comment, since you’re not capable of reading and following a train of conversation:

Radical groups (the KKK) while advocating for something “good” (safe neighborhoods) can also do horrible things (what the KKK is known for). That doesn’t mean everyone for the “good” part (the church charity) are themselves horrible.

Let me further help you out. The conversation was about so-called feminist crime. Paul Johnson used some video and wikipedia articles that showed individual people who identified as feminist (in some cases) committing crimes. My point was that just because a bad person who happens to be a feminist commits a crime, doesn’t mean that ALL feminists are bad.

I then turned to the KKK analogy. Just because a KKK member happens to be a Christian, does not mean that all Christians are bad (or KKK members).

See how that works. Things make a lot more sense when you take the time to read.

Cool, so by your twisted, narrow world-view definition KKK is along the line of misunderstood white rights activists who got a bad rep because of a few radicals and not all KKK activists are horrible people? Uh huh, got ‘cha.

I love how this will forever pop up if you google her name. Try to find a job now, crazy bitch. Why does activism in a good cause always has to attract brutes. It’s just gives a cause to their agression and hatered. It’s soiling it and that’s very sad. And im sorry the boy had so much stress and trouble with her. She shoudlve been send off to do some social work. At least

I would have bounced her of. the cement a couple times and cuffed her and called the cops. Women have a “privilege ” mentality that needs to be shut down. 1000’s and 1000’s of men go to jail every year because of these liing cu-ts. It has to stop. This fat hog did not want her huge gut on film

You are in denial. Grow up and smell the coffee. 1000’s upon 1000’s men go to jail on the word of these man hating loon bags. If you do not want to get a false arrest on your record you had better wake up. It is not isolated.

The woman in the video should be sitting behind bars for 20 years without possiblity of early parole.

Imagine if an adult man approached an underage female, assaulted her , ripped her shirt off and then lied to the police. I’m pretty damn sure he wouldn’t be getting away with a slap on the wrist.
Female privilege at it’s most pure.

“I am a MtF transgender”
Ok, so you’re a guy that likes to pretend to be a chick, that doesn’t mean you are not still a man. Female privilege will still cut you no matter how hard you close your eyes and try to pretend you are something you’re not.

It’s not a “drone” — It’s a remote controlled quadracopter. Drones are controlled from much further away, and tend to be much more stealthy. This thing is a noisy helicopter that uses a camera to allow the RC pilot to navigate.

Mock away. It will just reveal you for what you are – at best, some person inexplicably afraid of women. At worst, a person who hates women. Public mocking – you mean like the comments on just about every post at womenagainstmen?

I completely invite it. The more this nonsense is out in public, the less likely people are going to identify and join such groups thinking that it represents their views.

I’m 100% in favor of you publicly mocking me. Just like I’d be 100% in favor of the KKK publicly mocking me. See, by doing so, it very visibly let’s me know exactly who the hate mongers are in my community.

And then, when I tell people about such hate groups, I don’t need to make up convoluted explanations or posses secret details. I can just point to the public displays of Paul Johnson and his cohort.

Video 1
At the U of T, they weren’t just protesting and getting rowdy. The police had to shove them out of the way because they were blockading the doors, which IS a crime. They also spat on the police, which is assault with a bodily fluid. They also pulled fire alarms to disrupt the event — again, criminal.

Video 2
She JACKED that girls signboard right out of her hands with force, took it to her office, and destroyed it. That’s theft and destruction of property.

Video 3
The feminist attitude promotes the kind of hatred that leads to battery like this (and the projective lies that seem to enable it i.e. “Get your hands off my breasts!” or whatever she said, as she pressed her breasts into him.)

Video 4
Having your crotch spray-painted isn’t vandalism, it’s sexual assault. They were spat on (assault), spray-painted themselves (assault), and they stripped and performed lewd acts in public in front of them (public indecency, which where I live will get you on the registry). The list of laws they broke is long. I can’t believe you think having your crotch spray-painted is “vandalism.”

I can’t believe you really watched that video and didn’t see anything but vandalism.

So forget what I said about the KKK — I used them merely as an illustration. You seem to have trouble with the illustration I provided, and it’s not necessary.

You asked me for some evidence, not to prove to you conclusively that feminism is a hate group. And I specifically said, “this will get you started.”

I am not a scholar on the matter, and it’s not my mission in life to change your life.

But many scholars have come to this conclusion. Look at these people and their works: Erin Pizzey, Janice Fiamengo, Helen Smith, Esther Vilar, Robert St. Estephe. There are many more, but as I said before I am not a scholar. Each of these people could provide you with more references.

To me, it’s plain as day that feminism is a violent ideology of hatred. And you seem so incredibly inclined to burden everyone but feminists with the evils of self-proclaimed feminists that I can’t help but malign you as a hateful individual sympathetic with their movement. And as such, my investment in you has reached its limit.

If you want to understand the growing number of men and women fed up with feminism, the facts and theories are there for you to find readily with a search engine. If not, just don’t be surprised when you find yourself mocked and ridiculed publicly more and more in the coming years.

1. No “crime” committed here. The worst case was some people who got rowdy with the police who were breaking up the protest.
2. Definitely wrong. But in itself doesn’t make the case that feminism leads to hate crimes (especially in the context of the other videos).
3. Actual crime. But again, seems to be an isolated incident of one person acting in an extreme manner.
4. No crime beyond vandalism

If I took three of those videos (and I could easily find a fourth) – I could also make the completely wrong (just like you) conclusion that it demonstrates that being white makes you a member of a hate group.

Here is a hint on the whole hate group thing. If you presented executive summary of the group under question (the one written by the group themselves) to a set of people who’d never heard of them, then showed them 4 cherry picked videos, how many do you think would accept your conclusion? I bet in the case of the KKK, it would be 100%. Here, even people with no previous biases would not be convinced. Not even a plurality.

She should be charged with, at minimum,1st degree assault & battery, lying to a peace officer, breach of peace, destruction of property… I hope he brings a civil suit against her. Sick, manipulative psycho!

I’ve seen better head shots resulting from mosquitoes hitting my windshield. This girl has got to learn to keep her hands to her self. Don’t think anyone would be interested in anything else. I’n sure her Mother and Father did not raise her that way. Or at least I hope not.

I got started on the womenagainstmen site. There is a lot of misinformation, data out of context, or data taken from fiction and presented as fact (so sorta like being out of context but even more devious).

I can have a discussion about what the info in the wikipedia links means with respect to feminism. But there is just so much wrong in womenagainstmen that I don’t see a point discussing it with you. We won’t have any foundation (points we both agree to be correct) for a meaningful discussion.

Again, I won’t be able to watch and comment on the video’s till later (tonight).

I agree that the punitive measures taken were too little. However, the comments that follow the article illustrate the incorrect parallels that are often drawn between feminism and the treatment of women in our, still largely, patriarchal society. Many commentators seem to believe that the lighter treatment of women in legal circumstances only started with the feminist movement. This is not the case, though. In keeping with the status in society that women have occupied for hundreds of years, somewhere on par with that of children, women have never been as accountable as men, as a group, when it comes to laws that should govern men and woman without regards to their gender (I.e. assault). This is not meant to be a diatribe against women but a lamenting of the system that refuses to grant them rights and responsibilities equal to that of men due to some perceived frailty. Any reasonable feminist will call out for the appropriate measure of justice on a woman at fault in order to enforce the equality they desire for women. To assert that a woman is getting a free pass because of “feminazis” and their conspiratorial efforts to flip society 180 degrees is as ignorant and irresponsible as claiming that HIV was manufactured to exterminate blacks, homosexuals, or the poor; it’s ridiculous and trivializes the real issue.

On a side note, the comment plugging for strictly heterosexual marriage on the basis of women surrendering themselves to men in order to satisfy some deep instinct to be maternal is so woefully idealogical and obviously informed by a traditional religious view mixed carelessly with a smidge of anthropology as to be laughable.

I’ll get to the video’s later today. But your wikipedia links don’t show “feminist crime”. At best, you’ve just shown radical groups commit crimes. That would be like claiming all equal rights activists are violent criminals because a few such groups used violence and terror to try and further their goals. I’d think your KKK example would be proof that radical groups while advocating for something “good” can also do horrible things. That doesn’t mean everyone for the “good” part are themselves horrible.

So, what horrible things has feminism done? That somehow, most of the world doesn’t know? You make it sound like feminists are the illuminati or some other shady conspiracy theory group.

The problem with your kkk argument is that I don’t need to draw conclusions about the true nature the kkk from secret information only a select few to posses. All I have to do is look at publicly available statements and actions that the kkk has officially attributed to themselves.

But, for the purpose of discussion, I’m still interested in learning what evils feminists has perpetrated. There’s got to be police reports, court cases, new articles on this. So, any real evidence to back your assertion?

And no, it doesn’t sound as bad as when someone from outside the group calls them out for what they really are. A good enough bullshitter can make the KKK sound good. If you don’t believe that you’ve never encountered weapons-grade bullshit. But then again, if you support feminism, you certainly have encountered weapons-grade bullshit.

What I’m saying is essentially feminists are a hate group, and they’ve been using this bullshit, “Feminism is only about equality — the dictionary says feminism is…” argument since forever in an effort to recruit dolts and people so new they really don’t know what feminism has done into the fold.

The article claims that Rockefellers or feminism is to blame, not women. And I don’t see a mention anywhere about who is supposed to fix it.

And I’m still having trouble getting from “if feminism can upend the world” to “men are useless.”

You’re confusing feminism with women, and using them interchangeably. They are not; feminism is a political ideology, and women are a demographic of people.

“If in fact the premise is true, that feminism in one fell swoop was able to upend the world…”

“A further conclusion must then be, if it is the case that women can completely change society as a group in such a short time…”

You’re also confusing men with me personally, and using them interchangeably. Either that or it was somehow my personal responsibility to stop feminism (or women, or whatever) from doing what it did as outlined in the article.

Dude, you gotta get your thinking straight. Think about what it is you’re trying to say before you just start hacking away at the keyboard.

Hahaha, yeah, that’s not quite how they describe themselves. It IS completely bad. Wow, now you’re trying to rehab the Klan’s image? They claim to be a “non-violent Christian organization that wants to protect the safety of their race (white) against the machinations of other groups and Jews who are manipulating the world through financial and racial policies”. If you think that “doesn’t sound all that bad”. . .

The article is arguing that the world is falling apart and it is women’s fault. And, indirectly in some ways, directly in others, it argues that it is up to men to fix the problem. I’m just saying that the article writer and those who agree with it are missing a very key point. If in fact the premise is true, that feminism in one fell swoop was able to upend the world, after centuries of male dominated rule, in just a few decades, then men must necessarily be useless. This is the logical conclusion of the article.

A further conclusion must then be, if it is the case that women can completely change society as a group in such a short time, then clearly, they are the right ones and whiners like you are just jealous.

So, either the article is right or it is completely flawed and you’re just passing off your personal failings on “women”.

Well, I’m not a slave to sex. . . so I pretty much continue doing the right thing. Given that women haven’t banded together to corrupt society, especially from government since relatively few women are even in government compared to men, I think you being corrupt is more likely from you just being a corrupt person.

I was just briefly on the phone with the Police Department of that area and actually got to speak with the dispatcher who handled that case. As it seems the social media are coming down VERY HARD on miss Mears, and this will never go away in her foreseeable future. The PD dispatcher was quite courteous and very tactful and explained procedure to me.

As for defending myself, I wouldn’t have had any problems with her. One hand. I wouldn’t have damaged her – just one hand I would have needed to subdue and restrain her. But if I would have, the cops would have charged ME with assault. He did the perfect thing and he won. He maintainied his sense and recorded the incident. *Perfect score*

Contrary to it’s dictionary meaning, (the word defined by popular use.) However, when people put it on as a label then the definition becomes what they do in the name of that label. I will grant you that she never called her self in the video a feminist. I have not looked at her face book page nor am I in any desire to. I will say that her actions match those of the most vocal, and active feminists. Especially if as I have read here, and else where she tried to say he assaulted her when the police arrived, and even got his fly down before they arrived.

The issue isn’t the definition of feminism. The issue is what is done in it’s name. The double standard. The neglect of recognition of men as humans, with equal rights, and protections. No one is saying that women as people don’t have problems that need to be addressed. However, feminists often disregard men, or the issues affecting them. The media, higher education, and legal system also marginalize men.

Boko Haram abducts 200 plus girls, and it’s world wide panic. Prior to that they kill more than 800 boys, and no one cares. More recently they go on a killing spree in something like three towns near the Cameroon border, and we’re told they killed hundreds of people. No one bothers to say the people were all men, they were just people.

This week is International Men’s Health Week. This little week was started back in 2002. Breast Cancer Awareness MONTH is October, and started in 1985. My calendar at work has Breast Cancer Awareness Month on it. Does not have one thing about Men’s health week. Men get one week for all the health issues that kill them. Women get a whole month to just, “Save the ta ta’s,” That sound equal to you? That sound like women got the short end of that stick?

No wonder there are millions of men out there who without knowing it are MGTOW. Tides rising, and men without joining any movements or taking any sides are starting to notice that black and yellow striped cord on their side of the relationship equation. The one marked, “Eject,” and they are pulling it.

Okay, Elliot Rodger was in no way a Men’s Rights Activist. He was some dude who was screwed up in the head. Follow up, the majority of his victims were men, not women. He probably talked about women the most, but hated everyone. Furthermore, it’s women like you who make people hate femimists. “Women can smell men like you”? Give me a break.

OMG – have i stumbled into one of the female-hating sites Elliot Rodger so loved?? There are some scary ass ‘incels’ here. Yeah – I learned that from Rodger – he taught us a LOT about your types. And you wonder why women are scared of men like you?

Yes, she should have been charged like a man would have been! I mean – she’s trying to gouge his eyes out at one point, tries to rip his cheek. Plus – you can tell she came out of herself – she started to look like she was blind and totally insane! Watch it again and watch her eyes behind the glasses. She looks like she’s blind – but clearly she can see.

Damn – tourists are going to be afraid of taking pictures of sights soon! Besides – we are filmed every where we go, like the blogger said.

She was using her equal rights to assault a male and now she can have her equal rights in prison like a man. I think calling her a feminazi bitch fits just fine since most of them act like this too. Ever watch them protest things, pull fire alarms, and go all psycho on people? There’s vids out there of it.

I don’t think a Ph.D. in English literature really qualifies this man to be an expert on “world police states” and “The rockefeller mega cartel,” neither of which exist, and both of which sound crazy. In addition, this article has absolutely no foundation in biology or evolutionary psychology and this man just generally sounds like a lunatic. Educate yourself.

She got a misdemeanor for being caught red-handed in an assault… because she has female body parts and that equates to a 40% discount on crimes. P-Pass… as others call it. These female on male assaults are probably not rare at all, just not every guy has a camera running at the time of the assault to protect themselves from being arrested by cops and convicted by white knight judges. Always Be Recording (ABC)… because the laws are not setup to protect men.

Feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass media (i.e. propaganda.) to control society.

In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted. I will expand on the Rockefeller’s role, but first we need to remember that for a woman, love is an instinctive act of self-sacrifice.

She gives herself to her husband and children and is fulfilled by seeing them thrive and receiving their love, respect and gratitude.

A woman makes this supreme sacrifice to only one man who will cherish her and provide for his family. Men instinctively want to fulfill this responsibility. This is the essence of the heterosexual contract (i.e. marriage): female power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Sex is the symbol of this exclusive bond. Marriage and family may not be for everyone but it is the natural path for most.

Feminism has trained women to reject this model as “an old fashioned, oppressive stereotype” even though it reflects their natural instincts.

Now that love and marriage have been “discredited,” women have nothing left to exchange for love but sex. Thus, many are unnaturally obsessed with appearance and pathetically give their bodies to all and sundry. Permanent love is not based on a woman’s sex appeal, or personality or achievements. Ultimately, it is based on self-sacrifice. We love the people who love us.

People do not realize that feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive.

Recently Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Midler’s movies and “America: From Freedom to Fascism” identified all three confirming what I have been saying.

While trying to recruit Russo for the CFR, Nicholas Rockefeller told him that his family foundation created women’s liberation using mass media control as part of a long-term plan to enslave humanity. He admitted they want to “chip us.” Google “Rockefeller Foundation” and “Women’s Studies” and you’ll get a half million citations.

The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young.

Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base. Displacing men in the role of providers also destabilizes the family.

A drastic paradigm shift is required to make sense of the world. The Rockefellers are part of the private world central banking cartel that also controls (the gay marriage promoting) mass media, defence, pharmaceutical and other cartels.

To protect their monopoly of credit and wealth, they are instituting a world police state (“world government”) using the bogus 9-11 attack and endless war as a pretext. Rockefeller told Russo about this plan a year before 9-11…