<snip>
> > I assume "that" is referring to the "response header" versus "response-
> > header" change. Unless these two versions have different meanings, I'd
> > say the usage should probably be consistent throughout the entire
> > document.
<snip>
> IMHO there's a difference between those two. If we say "response
> header", we're talking about a header on a response. When we say
> "response-header", it's about the things described in
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-
> 02.html#rfc.section.6.2>.
In that case, I'd say "Response header" and "response-header" respectively.
(Capital "R" Response, referring to
<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-
02.html#response>.)
> More opinions needed :-)
The more the merrier.
-- Travis