News, information and analysis from the black left.

You are here

Obama and the GOP Circus Show

Submitted by Glen Ford on Wed, 12/14/2011 - 14:03

by BAR executive editor Glen Ford

Having shown his hand over the last three years as an eager – although often spurned – partner in Republican austerity politics, and a war-maker who could make George Bush blush, President Obama will seek reelection with bankers’ money while pretending to remain “infuriated” with Wall Street. The banksters are in on the scam, since “nothing can match Obama’s crowning glory: the permanent bailout of finance capital.” The Republican candidate, whoever it is, will certainly spout an unambiguously pro-business line. But, “a GOP gaggle that savages itself for the privilege of singing the praises of the rich can only bring down the wrath of the people on the bankers’ heads.” Wall Street knows Obama is their true “shining knight.”

Obama and the GOP House of Horrors Show

by BAR executive editor Glen Ford

“Wall Street will once again be putting its money on Obama – and he is counting on them.”

Barack Obama’s December 6 Osawatomie, Kansas, speech, in which he pretended to be the reincarnation of President Teddy “The Trust Buster” Roosevelt, marks the rhetorical start of his reelection campaign. Obama kicked off his 2008 campaign channeling Abe Lincoln, in Springfield, Illinois, which means he has used up the two historical Republican leaders held in highest esteem among Democrats and Americans in general – the great “cross-over” presidents. Obama has always schemed to position himself as the politician in the center of the Big Tent, who synthesizes the best of conflicting political currents in a valiant quest for national unity and renewed purpose. As intended, the net result of Obama’s exquisite cross-over charade has been to neutralize the voices of what had passed for a Left, co-opting or obliterating the only popular forces that might resist the hegemony of money.

The Mensa Society should certify as geniuses the Wall Street high rollers who put the early money on Obama, last time around. He was the perfect façade for consolidation of the rule of capital in the 21st century. Obama almost instantaneously fulfilled the promise of his 2004 speech to the Democratic National Convention: “…there is no Black America…there is only the United States of America.” Well before Election Day, 2008, Black America would cease to exist as an oppositional force, effectively sweeping the nation’s most consistently progressive ethnic group from the field. African Americans remain largely irrelevant to the political discourse, as reflexive boosters of the Black man in the White House. With Blacks neutralized, white progressives, unsteadily stumbling out of their Obama delirium, were without their historical political compass. What are the Blacks saying, they asked? Nothing. This is the vacuum that spawned the Occupy movement, which became a magnet by default in a progressive political wasteland. OWS’s elemental appeal: end the rule – or, at least, the excesses – of the rich.

“The net result of Obama’s exquisite cross-over charade has been to neutralize the voices of what had passed for a Left, co-opting or obliterating the only popular forces that might resist the hegemony of money.”

In 2012, Wall Street will once again be putting its money on Obama – and he is counting on them. How else can he possibly raise a billion campaign dollars? Multinational capital turned to Obama to resurrect America’s plummeting reputation in the world in the wake of George Bush’s blustering debacle in Iraq. His mandate from Wall Street was not to make peace, but to refurbish the face of imperialism for future, better managed adventures to secure the planet’s wealth for corporate plunder. Obama had promised as much, back in 2002, when he stipulated that he did not oppose war, but only “dumb” wars. His “smart” drones now menace the globe from the skies. An American-led offensive is in full swing, with the same objective as Bush: to militarily contain the growth of China, Russia and any other combination of counter-weights to U.S. hegemony. U.S. “humanitarian” intervention, a theme initiated under Bush, has been polished to a full-fledged doctrine of NATO that will bear Obama’s name in the history books.The “peace candidate” has rebranded war.

Obama will campaign as the man who saved capitalism – “the greatest force for economic progress in human history,” as he said in Kansas, last week – doubtless with references to the other Roosevelt, Franklin, whose New Deal Obama has methodically wrestled onto “the table” for dismemberment. Obama certainly saved the insurance industry from the real threat of Medicare-for-All, in 2009, later maneuvering Medicare to the edge of the privatized dustbin. Public education is now ripe to become a “public-private” consortium, in which the public pays the overhead while private corporations reap the profits and shape the curriculum, as teachers are de-unionized and de-professionalized.

“U.S. ‘humanitarian’ intervention, a theme initiated under Bush, has been polished to a full-fledged doctrine of NATO that will bear Obama’s name in the history books.”

But, nothing can match Obama’s crowning glory: the permanent bailout of finance capital. The U.S. Treasury and, especially, the Federal Reserve have been transformed into open spigots for the capital needs (and speculative whims) of Wall Street. Whatever line previously existed between Wall Street and the American State, has been systematically erased by Obama and his corporate cabinet. Public, Federal Reserve, and corporate accounts commingle in an ever-flowing river of transactions that defy accounting and accountability, pumping tens of trillions into corporate financial institutions, worldwide. The Occupy Wall Street Movement is, at root, fueled by the public’s intuitive sense that finance capital has absorbed and totally subordinated the State – and they are right.

Wall Street knows who facilitated the coup, and will reward Obama with their votes in the campaign contributions contest, the real election. He has proven in practice to be what they bargained for when corporate America vetted Obama, in 2003 and 04: the best man to defend their interests by neutralizing, rather than antagonizing, what is loosely called the Democratic base. He says now that he was “infuriated” with the banks in 2008, but he saved the Bush bailout after its initial defeat, while Republican candidate John McCain went catatonic. Once president, Obama dedicated the full faith and credit of the American people to Wall Street’s resurgence, enabling them to further consolidate their political and economic oligarchy. It is to the bankers’ benefit that Obama posture as a critic of high finance; how else could the public be fooled into a replay of the last three years of bankers’ heaven?

When Obama told an April, 2009 meeting with bankers, "My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks," it was the truth – and they have all come to appreciate it. Obama’s administration, while ostentatiously pushing financial reform in 2010, beat back every attempt to reign in derivatives, the Wall Street-invented doomsday instruments that were at the heart of the meltdown. Six hundred-plus trillion dollars in derivatives still loom over the global economy, thanks to Obama’s unbreakable compact with Wall Street. He is their shining knight, whose value lies precisely in the people’s belief that he is not.

“It is to the bankers’ benefit that Obama posture as a critic of high finance.”

No one in the Republican field can protect Wall Street from the “pitchforks” as Obama can. Mitt Romney looks and talks like a banker. Newt Gingrich is the personification of Wall Street’s inner misanthrope, racist and crook, who should be hidden from public view at all costs. A GOP gaggle that savages itself for the privilege of singing the praises of the rich can only bring down the wrath of the people on the bankers’ heads. They need The Great Deflector, Obama, to step to the precise center of the circus tent, looking Lincolnesque, or Rooseveltian (Teddy), or even Reaganish, while the GOP clowns soak up the public’s anger at the “1%’s” multitudinous sins.

The bankers will stick with Obama, and outfit him in a billion-dollar suit, the price tag and label detached. The unions and the Black Misleadership Class will sit in the cheap seats, hurling scorn at the evil GOP clowns, made up like Chucky. How many of the “99%” will actually come to the show, or find they have better things to do than be spectators at the Plutocrats & Oligarchs Two Ring Presidential Circus? We shall see. Three months ago, there was no Occupy Wall Street movement, putting out bounties on bankers.

4 Comments

Whenever someone asks me waht Alex jones means by "Left Cover" I'll show them this article. I mean the left attacks him only hafl heartedly because he represents the Noble Savage, he MUST be right cuz he's black. Even Malcolm never say a bamboozler like Obama.

The Times endorses the Obama administration's proposal to reward those who have broken our immigration laws.

Under current law, illegal immigrants who seek immigrant or temporary visas must apply from outside the United States. They must then ask the federal government to waive the three- and 10-year bars to return. Congress instituted these rules in 1996 as a penalty for immigrants who had been illegally present in the United States for long periods of time.

President Obama is bending these rules to put illegal immigrants ahead of the interests of citizens and legal immigrants. The administration's proposal to allow some illegal immigrants to stay here while the government decides on their waiver requests will encourage more illegal immigration.

Congress has defeated amnesty attempts several times. And most Americans want to see immigration laws enforced, not ignored. Obama (and The Times, for that matter) should put the interests of the American people first.

Rep. Lamar Smith

(R-Texas)

The writer chairs the House Judiciary Committee.

**********************************************
"President Obama is bending these rules to put illegal immigrants ahead of the interests of citizens and legal immigrants"

Thank You, Congressman Lamar Smith and the LA Times for publishing this.

If that ain't the truth. At this point I would vote for Ron Paul or a GOP candidate who will actually bring the country to a recognizable precipice. Nevertheless, I'm overseas at the moment and plan on keeping it that way. Really don't think I will participate in the 3 card Monte game called voting anyway, it's rigged.

Pages

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Our email list is up and working! Here's how to get Black Agenda Report in your email inbox every week!

Black Agenda Report is published weekly, every Tuesday or Wednesday. To receive a free email notice with links to the week's new content at Black Agenda Report click here...

Tried to create a new user and login at Black Agenda Report and failed?

It's not you, it's us. We're trying to curtail what used to be thousands of spam new users created daily, and have unintentionally shut the door to all new commenters. If you're one of those who've tried to create a login and comment on our stuff in the last month or so you would have found yourself blocked. We're stilll working on that, but we have no way to know you're a real human, not a spambot,

So please send us an email at publisher@blackagendareport.com. Make the subject "new user" or "unblock me" or something like that. We'll pull emails like that a couple times daily and lift the blocks.

Why you should comment on our articles here instead of Facebook

Facebook & Twitter are like rivers. If you're not standing by the bank when something floats by, it's gone. Good luck finding that brilliant conversation you had with somebody in a FB thread 2 or 3 weeks ago. People who "follow," "like," and "friend" you on FB may rarely or never see your posts, especially if they're answering someone else's, and those lacking that tenuous relationship are even less likely to see them.

So like and follow us on FB and Twitter, but when you post your comments on our articles here, anyone who finds the article finds the comment, now or a decade from now.

That's because Facebook respects your carefully thought out comment exactly as much as an emoticon or an LOL or STFU, LMFBAO, and needs to make room for the next one. Mark Zuckerberg doesn't respect you. We do. For lots more on how that works, listen to Jodi Dean below. And if you haven't already, register, login and comment on our articles. Comments are usually open for 30 days after an article is published.