Robert Jacobsen had developed a Java system for model trains and made this available online under an Artistic License, which entails that other programmers can use the software in their software, but have to recognise the original programmer. The company Kamind used portions of program to develop a competing and commercial product, but did not comply with the Artistic License in a number of respects, including attribution, copyright notices, tracked changes or availability of the underlying standard version. Jacobsen asked the court for a ruling, but the lower court did not rule in his favour, saying that the Artistic License merely imposed 'contractual' promises, and that a violation did not constitute copyright infringement. But The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which usually rules intellectual property cases, agreed that the Artistic License has consequences as to the copyright and can not be used without any recognition of the developer.

The ruling has great consequences for developers of open software, which is usually offered for free. It is the first time that an Artistic License has been recognised by the court. For programmers using open source software it means that they always will have to recognise the developer, while for companies it means that they can no use the software without for commercial purposes without the knowledge of the original developer.

Professor Larry Lessig, a founding member of Creative Commons, said in his own blog: "For non-lawgeeks, this won't seem important but this is huge. In non-technical terms, the Court has held that free licences set conditions on the use of copyrighted work. When you violate the condition, the licence disappears, meaning you're simply a copyright infringer. This is a very important victory." The ruling has implications for the Creative Commons licence which offers ways for work to go into the public domain and still be protected. These licenses are widely used by academic organisations like MIT for distributing coursework, scientific groups, artists, movie makers and Wikipedia among others. Mark Radcliffe of the Open Source Initiative said: "This opinion demonstrates a strong understanding of a basic economic principle of the internet; that even though money doesn't change hands, attribution is a valuable economic right in the information economy."

Order Dutch language book by clicking this image

WSA

About Me

Jak Boumans (1945) is principal consultant with Electronic Media Reporting, a private consultancy specialised in content strategy, based in Almere (The Netherlands). In 1970 he started in the publishing industry with companies like VNU and Kluwer, particularly in general encyclopaedias. From 1980 he got involved in electronic publishing, running a videotex studio. In 1984 he launched a daily online newsletter for the computer industry from London. In 1987 he was part of the production team that produced the first Dutch subscription CD-ROM for Kluwer for lawyers.
In 1990 he started the private company Electronic Media Reporting, a consultancy specialised in content. He worked for international organisation ( European Commission, OESO), Dutch ministries, national organisations and companies.
He is secretary-general of the European Academy of Digital Media (EADiM) and board member of the multimedia competition World Summit Award (WSA).
He has written for national and international magazines. He was contributor, editor and editor-in-chief of Telecombrief (1981-2004). He wrote, contributed to and co-edited books. His last book in Dutch was on Pre-internet in de polder (1967-1997).