While the stat sounds nice in theory...I think it has more to do with RG3/the system we run. It really shows how efficient RG3 was this year throwing the ball. For example, guys like Julio Jones/AJ Green arent even in the top 10 so it really doesn't show how good a WR is.

While the stat sounds nice in theory...I think it has more to do with RG3/the system we run. It really shows how efficient RG3 was this year throwing the ball. For example, guys like Julio Jones/AJ Green arent even in the top 10 so it really doesn't show how good a WR is.

dissing the best WR wr core weve had in 20 years again.... smh .

It also shows that our top 4 wrs are efficient. Meaning because of our running game they get open and get first downs or touchdowns at high percentage when given the ball. If we didnt have 4 wrs with ovee 500 yards and Garcon was healthy, he might have a chane to have 1500 yds and 12 tds, but he wasnt healthy and we have balance like the packers do. Some have been screaming at me all offseason they good enough because they have a "man crush" on one of two wrs, but we won the division with our best wr being hurt all year and he young guys will only improve.

Now that moss is back i think we can finally put the wr in the 2nd or 3rd and probably 4th round option to rest.

We have our vets who and Hank who are efficient, even if it is because of the running game, that's what a running game is supposed to do for a passing offense, open up more holes to throw in and get wrs open because DBs and lbs bite on play action. Then other than the vets we have two guys who barely got to play last year in Robinson and Briscoe but have flashed talent that they can develop into something good or even if we're lucky great._________________RIP SSFmike23md