Plan to Extend TPS Benefits

The Government Outlines Its Plan to Extend TPS Benefits Under Court Order

Written by Aaron Reichlin, Courtesy of American Immigration Council, Immigration Impact

In early October, a federal court ruled that the Trump administration had violated the law when it terminated Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for individuals from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan. After weeks of negotiation with the ACLU, which brought the lawsuit, the government has now come forward with a plan to put that decision in action while the case is on appeal. The government’s plan, published Tuesday night, provides crucial breathing room for TPS holders whose status was set to expire soon.

Under the government’s plan, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will draft a formal extension of TPS protections for Sudan, Haiti, El Salvador and Nicaragua. The government has promised that this extension will “remain in effect so long as the Court’s order remains in effect.”

In the short term, USCIS will automatically extend all work permits currently issued to TPS recipients from Sudan and Nicaragua for a six-month period ending on April 2, 2019. Both Sudan and Nicaragua’s TPS designations were set to end before that date; Sudan on November 2, 2018, and Nicaragua on January 5, 2019.

Because the TPS designations for El Salvador and Haiti are not set to expire until mid to late 2019, USCIS will not yet take any actions to extend work authorization for those countries. However, if the court’s order is not “reversed or invalidated” before April 2,2019, then USCIS will automatically extend benefits for TPS-holders from all four countries until at least January 2, 2020. Further extensions would then be made if necessary.

The government’s plan also provides some measure of protection for TPS holders if the lower court’s order is reversed on appeal. In that situation, TPS holders from countries where the TPS designation has already expired will be given an “orderly transition period” of four months. However, if the court’s order is reversed before TPS expires for a specific country, then the agency will use the original expiration date.

Almost immediately after the lower court’s order, the government filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Should the order be upheld by the Ninth Circuit, the government would likely appeal directly to the Supreme Court. Given the timing, it’s unlikely that the Supreme Court would be able to hear the case until the fall of 2019.

Because the ACLU’s lawsuit was filed before the Trump administration ended TPS for Honduras and Nepal, individuals from those countries are still at risk of losing legal status. As the recent caravan has shown, Honduras is still a country suffering from substantial instability, despite the administration’s decision to end TPS for that country.

Over the next year, as Congress debates the fate of individuals with TPS, it should keep in mind that hundreds of thousands of TPS holders deserve protection and the right to remain here in the country that they’ve made their home.

Contact TPS Houston Immigration Attorney Gasana

This article is provided for information purposes. Should you have any questions or be interested to learn more about this topic, contact Immigration Attorney Claudine Umuhire Gasana at claudine@cugasanalaw.com or call us at 281-809-5599 or 713-836-9376

Houston Immigration Lawyer Gasana has focused their practice on law applicable to family members of the green card holders or U.S. citizens, foreign skilled workers, U.S. employer and investor visa; waivers and deportation cases. Claudine Gasana is one of the Houston best immigration attorneys, Houston, TX top immigration lawyer in Houston. Her practice areas range from family green card solutions to a variety of non-immigrant work visas such as H1B, TN, F-1, and O-1 for legal cases in oil and gas, heathcare, higher education industries and more. Contact an experienced Houston Visa Lawyer or visit our immigration office today.

The information on this website is for general purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The reader should consult with a Licensed Attorney prior to filing for any petition as each individual case may be different.