Beatlemania Plus 50: Can Christians Appreciate the Fab Four?

This month marks the 50th anniversary of The Beatles’ first trip to America. I remember how depressed my family was following President Kennedy’s assassination, but how excited my siblings and I were to see The Beatles on our black-and-white television in February 1964. Their coming marked the beginning of the British invasion!

Since that legendary episode of The Ed Sullivan Show, I have been a fan of The Beatles’ music. I have followed the career of The Beatles fairly closely and am pretty familiar with all of their songs and albums as well as the music the band members produced following their official breakup in 1970. I have also read a couple dozen books about the lives and careers of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr. I mention this to demonstrate that I have some understanding concerning the lives, musical accomplishments, and philosophical views of four men who, though considered by many to be “the greatest rock band of all time,” have also been figures of controversy.

For example, in the aftermath of the Tate-La Bianca murders some 40 years ago, it was revealed that The Beatles’ music, particularly The White Album, was used by Charles Manson to attempt to justify his psychopathic philosophy and homicidal motivations (though Manson sought to blame virtually everyone except himself for his evil acts). For believers, The Beatles, as with many pop culture figures who live and promote nonChristian lifestyles, can be a source of debate for spiritual reasons. As a case in point, a brief bio about me on my church’s website (where I teach a regular adult Sunday school class) that mentions my fondness for The Beatles provoked one reader to express this concern:

How can a man who is a Christian, no less a man in the ministry, like music and musicians who mocked and hated the Lord Jesus?

When it comes to matters of personal preferences, such as taste in music and movies, it is important Christians exercise critical thinking, both in evaluating their own likes and those of others. Let’s examine this example of The Beatles for an illustration of how believers can implement careful thought and gracious respect in nonessential issues.

Complex Religious Views

The bold statement that The Beatles “mocked and hated the Lord Jesus” fails to appreciate the complex and evolving nature of the religious views held by these men. McCartney and Harrison came from Catholic homes whereas Lennon and Starr attended the Anglican Church as youths. Their religious views were far from consistent.

Their thinking on faith in the early days of their professional success (the early to mid-1960s) is probably best described as agnostic. In the late 1960s, they experimented with Eastern mysticism (transcendental meditation), with Harrison later aligning himself with the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON). Yet even later, Lennon and McCartney both seemed to move toward some type of religious pluralism (all faiths are true).

Lennon did make some controversial comments in the mid-1960s about The Beatles being more popular than Jesus. He later came to regret those statements, and not just because of the negative reaction he received. It is true that Lennon, for a time, seemed to flirt with atheism (see his songs entitled “God” and “Imagine”). But he also dabbled with what we today would call New Age ideas (Eastern mysticism).

However, more than one news reporter has noted that Lennon apparently became very interested in evangelical Christianity just before he was killed, even listening to several evangelists on television, like Billy Graham (see here). Reports convey that Lennon’s wife strongly opposed his new interest in Jesus and Christianity; and, thus, Beatle John returned to his earlier interest in Eastern mysticism and occultism. Some have said that this was simply Lennon’s passing “Jesus phase.”

My point is that the religious ideas expressed by The Beatles in their songs were much more complex and diverse than is often appreciated. When critiquing another person’s tastes—and even when enjoying our own entertainment choices—it is easy to simplify things and neglect to fully understand the nuances of the worldview or message represented in popular culture.

Searching for Hope and Love

The Beatles were gifted songwriters and talented popular musicians. They produced a variety of provocative and fun songs that reflected the basic generational beliefs of their time. Yet they also wrote songs that powerfully capture the universal human condition with themes like loneliness and the meaning of life (see, “A Day in the Life,” “Eleanor Rigby,” “Help,” “Nowhere Man,” and “Yesterday”).

As philosophers, however, they were rather naïve, hedonistic, and lacking in a coherent world-and-life view. They can be justifiably criticized for popularizing drug use within the youth culture. And, unfortunately, they contributed toward the acceptability of Eastern religions and cults in the West, especially among the young.

Like most of us, however, the four Beatles were searching for a philosophy of life that would provide them with enduring love, hope, and peace. Unfortunately, they failed to recognize that the Christian Gospel they grew up with held the key to the truths and virtues they relentlessly pursued in the 1960s. It is indeed ironic that historic Christianity uniquely encompasses many of the ideals that The Beatles eloquently sang about and longed for in their personal lives.

I’m able to appreciate their musical and lyrical abilities without accepting their convoluted philosophical and religious ideas—much the same way that many Christians appreciate the genius of Mozart and Wagner without adopting their nonChristian beliefs and lifestyles. Believers should think through their proper relationship to culture and its popular influences. Then they can follow their conscience before God when it comes to the style of music they listen to.

Yet hopefully they can avoid judging others who upon reflection view things differently (concerning matters of conscience, see 1 Corinthians 8). I’d challenge believers to dig a little deeper on this issue. We ought to cultivate a habit of reflection and an attitude of graciousness when we encounter a topic or question where the distinctly Christian perspective in not clear.

The lads from Liverpool were once the most popular people on the planet. Yet they, too, were searching for answers to life’s big questions. I pray that Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr will yet come to know the One in whom it can truly be said that all you need is His love (John 3:16).

Kenneth,
I too remember with great fondness the excitement, creativity, and music of the Beatles. It was they who inspired me to buy a cheap guitar, learn to read and write music (which later on the Lord took that interest and turned it toward serving Him.

I totally agree that John, Paul, and George were gifted musicians and composers. What’s amazing is that none of them had formal musical training – yet, had a knack for composing melodies that could be lovely, catchy, and fun all at the same time.

I too had always hoped, even prayed, that at some point they would come to Christ. It was distressing to see such gifted people bumping into a little bit of truth, but then moving away from the full truth of the gospel into a lost maze of drug use, political activism, eastern mysticism, and several other “isms” – everything but the simple truth of the Gospel. Their lostness was so out there in front of everyone.

I also agree that it is possible to appreciate and enjoy their music without adopting their views or endorsing their personal lifestyles. If we, as Christians, cannot listen to music written by unbelievers because they hold non-Christian world views, then we are not left with very much to listen to in ANY genre of music – from baroque, to classical, to romantic, to Stephen Foster (a hopeless alcoholic), to Scott Joplin, to Frank Sinatra, and many, many more.

If the songs themselves were mocking God or Jesus, which Lennon’s song “Imagine” comes very close to doing, then yes, of course we, as Christians, don’t endorse such songs or music, rather we should rebuke the views and false ideas taught in those particular songs.

But, songs that are just about everyday life, the human condition, romance (as opposed to explicit sexual references), and even some political (i.e. Dylan’s “The Times They Are A-Changing”), or songs that are just silly but fun (i.e. “The Little Old Lady from Pasadena”) – I see no violation of Christian values to enjoy or listen to such songs.

Interesting article regarding two of my favorite subjects: Religion and The Beatles. As a person who also grew up in a ‘Christian’ church environment like the Beatles, I can totally relate to their disconnect. Ironically the main barrier between Jesus and people today is the ‘religion’ of Christianity. Where in Jesus’ teachings does it say to build huge churches, congregate every Sunday and sing? Where does it say there needs to be a hierarchy with a list of do/don’t rules? Where does it say the laws of the Torah must be followed by everyone? I can list many examples where the ‘church’ is extremely hypocritical of Jesus’ teachings.

Let’s just take the example of the person who wrote you, scolding you for liking the Beatles. What a judge mental statement by him. Who is he to judge your soul? He should remove the plank in his own eye before attempting to ermine the splinter in yours. I’ve found this type of attitude among so-called Christians to be the rule, rather than the exception.

The Beatles weren’t perfect, but no one is. But I do think that, for the most part, they lived a life of peace, non- judgement and faith closer to the teachings of Jesus than 99% of most Christians.

One should not idolize a person as God, whether it be John Lennon, Buddha, or even Jesus the man (another topic entirely). I think this thought is what brought them closer to Eastern religions than Christianity, although the actual teaching of Jesus are completely congruent.

One last thought is if you were in control of the world and the thing you wanted most was to separate people from Jesus, how would you go about this? I know the first thing that I would do would be to make Christianity very, very popular. At the same time I would infiltrate it and completely change the teachings of the church from those of Jesus. What better way to deceive people than to make them think feel like they are following the right path, yet in reality they are practicing exactly what I want, such as war, egotism, love of money, fear of hell, self-righteousness, etc. Sure a few people will actually study the Bible and know the truth. But most are too lazy and just blindly follow ‘the church.’ Following this logic, who do you think is in charge of the Christian church?

Reasons To Believe Website & Blogs

Friends' Blogs

7 Truths That Changed the World

In 7 Truths That Changed the World, I explore some of Christianity’s most transformational ideas and offer a biblical, historical, and philosophical look at how the world changed when Christ and his followers came on the scene.

A World of Difference

In A World of Difference, I encourage readers to put their own beliefs to the test by outlining nine distinct ways to evaluate any worldview for soundness. I demonstrate this testing method on Christianity, naturalism, Islam, postmodernism, and pantheistic monism.

Without a Doubt

In Without a Doubt I strive to provide clear, solid answers to 20 tough faith questions, such as "Isn't Morality Simply in the Eye of the Beholder?" and "How Can a Good and All-Powerful God Allow Evil?"

RTB Live! vol. 13: Everyday Apologetics

In this new DVD, I field a series of tough questions on religious pluralism, the problem of evil, and more—the same kinds you might be asked by a nonbelieving friend or family member.