No, as Doitsu pointed out in the first post it works fine if you just move the declaration as is into an external linked stylesheet. It's just another example of Flightcrew dodginess really (and no, I'm not a fan of it).

Has any thought been given to making Flight Crew into a good replacement for HTML Tidy?

I can't imagine that crossing anyone's mind.

(not that I wouldn't mind seeing new alternatives to Tidy, mind you... it's just that I can't imagine why Flight Crew would ever take on Tidy's responsibilities. The projects have such different goals/bailiwicks, after all)

(not that I wouldn't mind seeing new alternatives to Tidy, mind you... it's just that I can't imagine why Flight Crew would ever take on Tidy's responsibilities. The projects have such different goals/bailiwicks, after all)

OK. I thought that Flight Crew and Tidy were parts of the same tool in Sigil. I know that you guys msut have put a great deal of work into Tidy and improved it for ebook files. I was thinking that this could be used to publish a new version of Tidy that also incorporates the error checking and vaslidation of Flight Crew.

So I rephrase the question.

Has any thought been given to publishing a new and improved version of Tidy?