The US is not as technologically advanced as most people think. If they were, they wouldnt have taken 10 years to fight Iraq FFS.

I agree.

The only exclusively American military technological advancement I have heard of in the past few weeks, has been of a new "cover buster" smart bullet they developed, to make battles against insurgents and the like go a lot smoother (Read this in The Economist). It is a bullet that explodes once it travels behind the enemy's cover, using an in-built computer to do so. And even then, they are developing it along side the German arms company, Heckler-Koch, so NATO forces in Afghanistan and Iraq will probably acquire this sooner or later anyway.

iLegion wrote:

If you believe in the Bible, a man will rise too power in the West, that every man and women likes, and he will declare peace with every nation, then out of nowhere poverty will hit the United States, and be forced to a World Wide War (WW3) and every nation will fight amongst one another until the final battle is fought at the field of Armegedon. (My opinion though)

The only exclusively American military technological advancement I have heard of in the past few weeks, has been of a new "cover buster" smart bullet they developed, to make battles against insurgents and the like go a lot smoother (Read this in The Economist). It is a bullet that explodes once it travels behind the enemy's cover, using an in-built computer to do so. And even then, they are developing it along side the German arms company, Heckler-Koch, so NATO forces in Afghanistan and Iraq will probably acquire this sooner or later anyway.

The only downside to it would be that each bullet would probably cost about 250k USD

The bullets cost 300 dollars each, and the gun itself (with some unnecessary attachments to be sure) costs 35k. Though I'm sure the U.S's bloated military budget can handle it. Although, to be fair, they're reducing it somewhat.

Russia does not hate the USA. This is not the 1960s. China has no reason to declare war on one of the biggest markets in the world, when China itself is a huge exporter. Some of the weapons that can be used nowadays (Hydrogen bomb) would result in mutually assured destruction, so if war was miraculously declared, it would be some form of cold war, not a Call of Duty war. This is real life, not a video game.

_________________Battle Dawn Wiki.W1lll is not currently here. Please leave a message after the tone.

I think what Legion said is more far-fetched than what some other people said. Random poverty, a fantasist western leader that EVERYONE likes and a "field of Armageddon" still sounds less believable than a coalition of China, Australia, Europe, the U.S and South America against Russia for example, or that the U.S can just point their nukes at other countries and not expect any kind of backlash at all. There always seem to be this thing that Russia still hates the U.S and wants revenge or whatever, though this is obviously not the case.

because im religious, and it actually SAYS that's what's gonna happen? and events for-told in the bible are happening now? The only realistic way (in your terms) would be a nuclear war, nothing else would cause mass destruction besides nukes.

You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum