The U.S. military is sending troops with serious psychological
problems into Iraq and is keeping soldiers in combat even after superiors
have been alerted to suicide warnings and other signs of mental illness,
a Courant investigation has found.

Despite a congressional order that the military assess
the mental health of all deploying troops, fewer than 1 in 300 service
members see a mental health professional before shipping out.

Once at war, some unstable troops are kept on the front
lines while on potent antidepressants and anti-anxiety drugs, with little
or no counseling or medical monitoring.

And some troops who developed post-traumatic stress disorder
after serving in Iraq are being sent back to the war zone, increasing the
risk to their mental health.

These practices, which have received little public scrutiny
and in some cases violate the military's own policies, have helped to fuel
an increase in the suicide rate among troops serving in Iraq, which reached
an all-time high in 2005 when 22 soldiers killed themselves - accounting
for nearly one in five of all Army non-combat deaths.

The Courant's investigation found that at least 11 service
members who committed suicide in Iraq in 2004 and 2005 were kept on duty
despite exhibiting signs of significant psychological distress. In at least
seven of the cases, superiors were aware of the problems, military investigative
records and interviews with families indicate.

Among the troops who plunged through the gaps in the
mental health system was Army Spec. Jeffrey Henthorn, a young father and
third-generation soldier, whose death last year is still being mourned
by his native Choctaw, Okla.

What his hometown does not know is that Henthorn, 25,
had been sent back to Iraq for a second tour, even though his superiors
knew he was unstable and had threatened suicide at least twice, according
to Army investigative reports and interviews. When he finally succeeded
in killing himself on Feb. 8, 2005, at Camp Anaconda in Balad, Iraq, an
Army report says, the work of the M-16 rifle was so thorough that fragments
of his skull pierced the barracks ceiling.

In a case last July, a 20-year-old soldier who had written
a suicide note to his mother was relieved of his gun and referred for a
psychological evaluation, but then was accused of faking his mental problems
and warned he could be disciplined, according to what he told his family.
Three weeks later, after his gun had been handed back, Pfc. Jason Scheuerman,
of Lynchburg, Va., used it to end his life.

Also kept in the war zone was Army Pfc. David L. Potter,
22, of Johnson City, Tenn., who was diagnosed with anxiety and depression
while serving in Iraq in 2004. Potter remained with his unit in Baghdad
despite a suicide attempt and a psychiatrist's recommendation that he be
separated from the Army, records show. Ten days after the recommendation
was signed, he slid a gun out from under another soldier's bed, climbed
to the second floor of an abandoned building and shot himself through the
mouth, the Army has concluded.

The spike in suicides among the all-volunteer force is
a setback for military officials, who had pledged in late 2003 to improve
mental health services, after expressing alarm that 11 soldiers and two
Marines had killed themselves in Iraq in the first seven months of the
war. When the number of suicides tumbled in 2004, top Army officials had
credited their renewed prevention efforts.

But The Courant's review found that since 2003, the military
has increasingly sent, kept and recycled troubled troops into combat -
practices that undercut its assurances of improvements. Besides causing
suicides, experts say, gaps in mental health care can cause violence between
soldiers, accidents and critical mistakes in judgment during combat operations.

Military experts and advocates point to recruiting shortfalls
and intense wartime pressure to maintain troop levels as reasons more service
members with psychiatric problems are being deployed to the war zone and
kept there.

"What you have is a military stretched so thin,
they've resorted to keeping psychologically unfit soldiers at the front,"
said Stephen Robinson, the former longtime director of the National Gulf
War Resource Center. "It's a policy that can do an awful lot of damage
over time."

Army officials confirmed that 22 soldiers killed themselves
in Iraq, and three in Afghanistan, in 2005. The Army suicide rate was about
20 per 100,000 soldiers serving in Iraq - nearly double the 2004 rate,
and higher than the 2003 rate that had prompted alarm. Three Marines also
committed suicide in Iraq last year.

The military does not discuss or even identify individual
suicide cases, which are grouped with other non-combat deaths. The Courant
identified suicide victims through Army investigative reports and interviews
with families.

Although The Courant determined that a spate of six suicides
occurred within eight weeks last year, from late May to July, there is
no indication that the military took steps to respond to the cluster.

While the 2005 jump in self-inflicted deaths was as pronounced
as the 2003 spike that had stirred action, Army officials said last week
that there were no immediate plans to change the approach or resources
targeted to mental health. They said they had confidence in the initiatives
put in place two years ago - additional combat stress teams to treat deployed
troops and increased suicide prevention programs.

Col. Elspeth Ritchie, the top psychiatry expert for the
Army surgeon general, said that while the Army is reviewing the 2005 suicides
as a way to gauge its mental health efforts, "suicide rates go up
and down, and we expect some variation."

Ritchie said the mental health of troops remains a priority
as the war enters its fourth year. But she also acknowledged that some
practices, such as sending service members diagnosed with PTSD back into
combat, have been driven in part by a troop shortage.

The challenge for us ... is that the Army has a mission
to fight. And as you know, recruiting has been a challenge," she said.
"And so we have to weigh the needs of the Army, the needs of the mission,
with the soldiers' personal needs."

But The Courant's investigation shows that troubled soldiers
are getting lost in the balance:

Under the military's pre-deployment screening process,
troops with serious mental disorders are not being identified - and others
whose mental illness is known are being deployed anyway.

A law passed in 1997 requires the military to conduct
an "assessment of mental health" on all deploying troops. But
the "assessment" now being used is a single mental health question
on a pre-deployment form filled out by service members.

Even using that limited tool, troops who self-report
psychological problems are rarely referred for evaluations by mental health
professionals, Department of Defense records obtained by The Courant indicate.
From March 2003 to October 2005, only 6.5 percent of deploying service
members who indicated a mental health problem were referred for evaluations;
overall, fewer than 1 in 300 deploying troops, or 0.3 percent, were referred.

That rate of referral is dramatically lower than the
more than 9 percent of deploying troops that the Army itself acknowledges
in studies have serious psychiatric disorders.

In addition, despite its pledges in 2004 to improve mental
health care, the military was more likely to deploy troops who indicated
psychological problems in 2005 than it was during the first year of the
war, the data show.

The Courant found that at least seven, or about one-third,
of the 22 soldiers who killed themselves in Iraq in 2005 had been deployed
less than three months, raising questions about the adequacy of pre-deployment
screening. Some of them had exhibited earlier signs of distress.

Also, at least three soldiers who killed themselves since
the war began were deployed despite serious mental conditions, including
bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

The military relies increasingly on antidepressants,
some with potentially dangerous side effects, to keep troops with known
psychological problems in the war zone.

Military investigative reports and interviews with family
members indicate that some service members who committed suicide in 2004
and 2005 were kept on duty despite clear signs of mental distress, sometimes
after being prescribed antidepressants, including a class of drugs known
as SSRIs.

In one case, a 26-year-old Marine who was having trouble
sleeping was put on a strong dose of Zoloft, an SSRI that carries a warning
urging doctors to closely monitor new patients for suicidal urges. Last
April, within two months of starting the drug, the Marine killed himself
in Iraq.

Some service members who experienced depression or stress
before or during deployments to Iraq described being placed on Zoloft,
Wellbutrin and other antidepressants, with little or no mental health counseling
or monitoring. Some of the drugs carry warnings of an increased risk of
suicide, within the first weeks of their use.

Those anecdotal findings conflict with regulations adopted
last year by the Army cautioning that antidepressants for cases of moderate
or severe depression "are not usually suitable for extended deployments."

Also, the military's top health official, Assistant Defense
Secretary William Winkenwerder Jr., indicated in testimony to Congress
last summer that service members were being allowed to deploy on psychotropic
medications only when their conditions had "fully resolved."

The use of psychiatric drugs has alarmed some medical
experts and ethicists, who say the medications cannot be properly monitored
in a war zone. The Army's own reports indicate that the availability and
use of such medications in Iraq and Kuwait have increased since mid-2004,
when a team of psychiatrists approved making Prozac, Zoloft, Trazodone,
Ambien and other drugs more widely available throughout the combat zone.

"I can't imagine something more irresponsible than
putting a soldier suffering from stress on SSRIs, when you know these drugs
can cause people to become suicidal and homicidal," said Vera Sharav,
president of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, a patient advocacy
group. "You're creating chemically activated time bombs."

The military is sending troops back into combat for second
and third tours despite diagnoses of PTSD or other combat-related psychological
problems - a practice that some mental health experts fear will fuel incidents
of suicide and violence among troops abroad and at home.

Although Department of Defense standards for enlistment
in the armed forces disqualify recruits who suffer from PTSD, the military
is redeploying service members to Iraq who fit that criteria. The practice,
which military experts concede is driven partly by pressure to maintain
troop levels, runs counter to accepted medical doctrine and research, which
cautions that re-exposure to trauma increases the risk of psychological
problems.

At least seven troops who are believed to have committed
suicide in 2005 and early 2006, and one who has been charged with killing
a fellow soldier, were serving second or third tours in Iraq. Some of them
had exhibited signs of combat stress after their first deployments, according
to family members and friends.

Some soldiers now serving second tours in Iraq say they
are wrestling with debilitating PTSD symptoms, despite being placed on
medications.

Jason Sedotal, a 21-year-old military policeman from
Pierre Part, La., returned home in March 2005 after seven months in Iraq,
during which a Humvee he was driving rolled over a land mine, badly injuring
his sergeant. After completing his tour, Sedotal was diagnosed with PTSD
and placed on Prozac, he said.

Last October, after being transferred to a new unit,
he was shipped back to Iraq for a one-year tour. During a short visit home
last week, he described being wracked by nightmares and depression and
convinced that "somebody's following me." When he conveyed his
symptoms to a doctor at Fort Polk in Louisiana last Tuesday, he said, he
was given a higher dose of medication and the sleeping pill Ambien and
told that he was to go back to Iraq.

"I can't keep going through this mentally. All they
do is fill me up on medicine and send me back," he said. "What's
this going to do to me in the future? I'm going to be 60 years old, hiding
under my kitchen table? I'm real scared."

More than 378,000 active-duty, Reserve and National Guard
troops have served more than one tour in Iraq or Afghanistan, representing
nearly a third of the 1.3 million troops who have been deployed, according
to Department of Defense statistics. That repeat exposure to combat could
dramatically increase the percentage of soldiers and Marines who experience
PTSD, major depression or other disorders, some experts say.

Recent studies have estimated that at least 18 percent
of returning Iraq veterans are at risk of developing PTSD after just one
combat tour.

"The [Department of Defense] is in the business
of keeping people deployable," said Cathleen Wiblemo, deputy director
for health care for the American Legion. "What the consequences of
that are, we haven't begun to see.

"This is uncharted territory. You're looking at
guys being extended or sent back multiple times into an extremely stressful
situation, which is different than past wars. ... I think the number of
troops that will be affected, it will be a huge number."

Preserving The Force

Military officials insist they have made aggressive efforts
to improve mental health services to troops in Iraq in the past two years.
After the spate of suicides in 2003, the Army dispatched a mental health
advisory team, which issued a report recommending additional combat-stress
specialists to treat troops close to the front lines, and encouraging training
and outreach to reduce the stigma associated with mental health problems.

A follow-up report, released January 2005, cited the
drop in suicides in 2004 as evidence that the Army's efforts were successful.
It also highlighted a decline in the number of soldiers who were evacuated
out of Iraq for mental health problems - from about 75 a month in 2003
to 36 a month in 2004. In 2005, an average of 46 soldiers were evacuated
each month, Army data show.

Overall, barely more than one-tenth of 1 percent of the
1.3 million troops who have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan have
been evacuated because of psychiatric problems.

Both advisory team reports recommended that soldiers
with mental health problems be kept in the combat zone in order to improve
return-to-duty rates and help soldiers avoid being labeled unfit.

"If you take people out of their unit and send them
home, they have the shame and the stigma," said Ritchie, the Army's
mental health expert.

But with the suicide rate climbing, the emphasis on treating
psychologically damaged soldiers in the war zone is raising new questions.

"You think it's a stigma to be sent home from the
Iraq war? That might be the line they're using" to justify retaining
troops, said Dr. Arthur S. Blank Jr., a psychiatrist who formerly served
as national director of the Veterans Administration's counseling centers.
"I wouldn't say that."

Mental health specialists who have served in Iraq acknowledge
that their main goal, under military guidelines, is to preserve the fighting
force. Some have grappled with making tough calls about how much more stress
a soldier can handle.

"You have to become comfortable with things we wouldn't
normally be comfortable with," said Bob Johnson, a psychologist in
Atlanta who counseled soldiers last year as chief of combat stress control
for the Army's 2nd Brigade. "If there were an endless supply [of soldiers],
the compassionate side of you just wants to get these people out of here.
They're miserable. You can see it in their faces. But I had to kind of
put that aside."

Army statistics show that 59 soldiers killed themselves
in Iraq through the end of last year - 25 in 2003, 12 in 2004, and 22 in
2005. Twelve Marine deaths also have been ruled self-inflicted.

The only confirmed Connecticut suicide is that of Army
Pfc. Jeffrey Braun, 19, of Stafford, who died in December 2003. His father,
William Braun, told The Courant he still did not have a full explanation
of what happened to Jeffrey, but said, "I've chosen not to pursue
it or question it. It's over and done with."

Military data show that deaths in Iraq due to all non-combat
causes, such as accidents, rose by 32 percent from 2004 to 2005. Of the
more than 500 non-combat deaths among all service branches since the start
of the war, gunshot wounds were the second-leading cause of death, behind
vehicle crashes but ahead of heart attacks and other medical ailments.

While many families of service members who died of non-combat
causes say they are not familiar with military deployment policies, some
question whether the military knowingly put their loved ones at risk.

Among them are relatives of Army Spec. Michael S. Deem,
a 35-year-old father of two, who was deployed to Iraq in January 2005 despite
a history of depression that family members say was known to the military.
Shortly before Deem deployed, a military psychiatrist gave him a long-term
supply of Prozac to help him handle the stress, his wife said.

Just 3 weeks after he arrived in Iraq, Deem died in his
sleep of what the Army later determined was an enlarged heart "complicated
by elevated levels of fluoxetine" - the generic name for Prozac.

Family members of some troops whose deaths have been
labeled suicides complain that the military has given them limited information
about the circumstances of the deaths. Some have had to wait more than
a year for autopsies and investigative reports, which they say still leave
questions unanswered.

Barbara Butler, mother of Army National Guard 1st Lt.
Debra A. Banaszak, 35, of Bloomington, Ill., said she has trouble understanding
why her daughter would have taken her own life in Kuwait last October,
as the military has determined. She said that while Banaszak, the single
mother of a teenage son, was proud to serve her country and had not complained,
the stresses of the deployment may have exacerbated her depression.

"She was used to being in charge and being a leader,
but never in these circumstances," said Butler. "If the Army
is right that she did this, it was nothing she would have done ordinarily.
It was that war that brought it about."

Recognizing Trouble

Some autopsy and investigative reports obtained by The
Courant make clear that service members who committed suicide were experiencing
serious psychological problems during deployment.

In the months before Army Pfc. Samuel Lee, of Anaheim,
Calif., killed himself in March 2005, an investigative report says, the
19-year-old had talked to fellow soldiers about a dream in which he tried
to kill his sergeant before taking his own life, and of kidnapping, raping
and killing Iraqi children. Three times, a soldier recounted in a sworn
statement, Lee had pointed his gun at himself and depressed the trigger,
stopping just before a round fired.

But two of Lee's superiors gave statements saying they
did not realize Lee was having trouble until the day he balanced the butt
of his rifle on a cot, put his mouth over the muzzle and fired.

But a number of other reports on 2004 and 2005 suicides
indicate that military superiors were aware that soldiers were self-destructing.

Among them was Army Staff Sgt. Cory W. Brooks, 32, of
Philip, S.D., who shot himself in the head on April 24, 2004. In sworn
statements, a major and first lieutenant acknowledged they had conducted
"counseling" with Brooks, and a first sergeant "detailed
his knowledge of SSG Brooks' suicidal ideations."

Brooks' father, Darral, said he believes his son's death
stemmed from a combination of personal and combat-related stress, and he
does not blame the military for retaining him in Iraq.

"Cory was a dedicated soldier. He wanted to be there,"
he said. "If his captain told him to walk off a cliff, he'd do it."

But in other cases in which superiors retained a soldier
who was experiencing mental health problems, families are not so forgiving.

Ann Scheuerman, mother of the soldier who shot himself
after his suicide note was discounted by Army officials, said her family
has had a frustrating time getting the military to acknowledge mistakes
in the way her son was treated.

"We wanted to make sure that whatever protocol they
have in place is used, and if it doesn't work, fix it," Scheuerman
said. "And to date, we're just not getting anything at all.

"Nothing can bring back my son," she said.
"But if something can be done to prevent any more deaths, then if
I offend a couple of people, I'll go ahead and apologize up front. Go ahead
and come after me, but something needs to be done."

Family members of Jeffrey Henthorn, the Choctaw, Okla.,
native, are concerned that the Army ignored blatant warnings that Henthorn
was suicidal.

An investigative report into Henthorn's death contains
statements indicating that Henthorn's "chain of command" was
aware that he had tried to harm himself in November 2004 - by slashing
his arm "intentionally, in a [horizontal] manner" - in the weeks
leading up to his second deployment to Iraq, while he was stationed at
Fort Riley in Kansas.

Then, soon after his deployment in December, a distressed
Henthorn took his gun into a latrine in Kuwait and charged it, in what
fellow soldiers feared was a suicide gesture. Although his superiors at
the scene grabbed the weapon away, his platoon sergeant returned the gun
the same day, after talking to Henthorn for about a half-hour, according
to a sworn statement. The platoon's first lieutenant was notified, but
there is no indication that Henthorn was referred for a mental health evaluation
or counseling.

Eighteen days later, after crossing into Iraq with his
unit, Henthorn finished what he had started.

"If you lock yourself in a latrine for 10 minutes
with your gun and threaten to hurt yourself, you don't just get your gun
back. You get relieved of duty and sent home," said Henthorn's father,
Warren, who is still struggling to understand what happened to his only
son.

"It's the same as Vietnam - all they care about
is the numbers in the field," he said. "That's all that matters,
having the numbers."

Ritchie insisted the military is working hard to prevent
suicides, which she said is a challenge, given that soldiers have access
to weapons.

"When you go back, in retrospect, there may be warning
signs," she acknowledged.

Addressing The Courant's findings, she added, "What
you don't see from that are the other cases that perhaps had the same warning
signs and were kept in [the combat] theater and went on to do OK in their
job."

While they would not comment on particular cases, Ritchie
and other military officials said they believe most commanders are alert
to mental health problems and open to referring troubled soldiers for treatment.
It is commanders, not medical professionals, who have final say over whether
a troubled soldier is retained in the war zone.

"I think the majority of our commanders are very
receptive," Ritchie said.

But some service members say commanders' sensitivity
to mental health issues varies.

"As a practical matter, the quality ... of the military's
mental health care professional is uneven," said Maj. Andrew Efaw,
a judge advocate general officer in the Army Reserve who handled trial
defense for soldiers in northern Iraq last year. "Likewise, the understanding
of mental health issues by commanders may also be spotty."

He said commanders weighing whether a service member
should be retained have to be mindful of how their troops will perceive
the decision.

"Your average commander doesn't want to deal with
a whacked-out soldier. But on the other hand, he doesn't want to send a
message to his troops that if you act up, he's willing to send you home,"
Efaw said.

Some troops and their families say the military has not
made good on its pledge to make mental health care easily accessible in
the field.

Summer Lipford of Statesville, N.C., said she urged her
son, Pfc. Steven Sirko, to talk to a counselor in April of last year, after
he complained in a phone call from Iraq that he was having nightmares,
losing weight and not sleeping.

"I asked Steven, `If you're having dreams that are
so [messed] up, why don't you go talk to somebody?'" Lipford recalled.
"He said, `Yeah, Mom, like that's gonna happen.' He said it was an
act of God to get to see somebody."

Four days later, Sirko, a 20-year-old medic, injected
himself with vecuronium, an anesthetic that causes muscular paralysis,
and died of an accidental overdose, according to what the military has
told Lipford.

Some returning troops acknowledge that their own fear
of being stigmatized kept them from seeking psychological help during deployments.
Despite the military's efforts to improve mental health care, soldiers'
perceptions of a stigma associated with seeking such care remained unchanged
between 2004 and 2005, with more than half of the soldiers surveyed by
Army teams expressing concerns that they would be viewed as weak.

Matthew Denton, a Camp Pendleton Marine and helicopter
mechanic, said he spent most of his six-month deployment in 2005 quietly
contemplating his own death aboard a ship in the Persian Gulf.

"My head was in a scary place. I remember thinking,
`I can't believe I'm working on a $14 million aircraft. I just don't care
about this,'" he said. "When I'd come out of my daze, I was worried
about messing up and endangering the life of my guys."

Denton, 30, said his depression was easy to keep secret
- pre- and post-deployment health screenings were self-reported, and commanders
hustling Marines through six-month rotations never probed his mental state.

Now back home, Denton, who is being treated for depression,
isn't sure whether he managed to stay below the radar - or whether there
was any radar to stay below.