The bigger question is: Can the Sedin-era Canucks actually win a Stanley Cup?

Given the Canucks somewhat blew the 1995-97 Detroit Red Wings model, they'll have to place their hopes in following the 2004-2008 Red Wings' path. First, let's take you back to the "ancient" past of 1995 and look at the Yzerman Era Wings that finished first overall in that strike-shortened season. After a couple of years of first round exits, the Wings finally made that season's Final only to lose in four straight to the Neutral Zone Trappers (the Jacques Lemaire era New Jersey Devils).

The shock to their left-wing lock system did not affect the Wings as much as the Canucks' loss to Tim Thomas in the 2011 Final did. The Wings bounced back strongly in '95/96 and again finished first overall. They looked set to take that victory lap but one Kris Draper face rearranged by the Colorado Avalanche's Claude Lemieux in the '96 Conference Finals and it was Patrick Roy lifting the Avs to the Cup.

A Devil in Avs' clothing

What did the Wings do to combat this physical assault to their at-that-point 41-year Cup drought? They dumped 35-year-old future Hall of Famer Dino Ciccarelli for two cents on the dollar to Tampa to clear some roster space for a younger version of such. To get that younger, grittier scoring winger the Wings traded a coming into-his-prime Keith Primeau and 34-year-old Paul Coffey (who was no slouch at that age potting 74 points for the '95 Wings) for a power forward by the name of Brendan Shanahan. Shanny's 46 goals + nine more in the playoffs helped the Wings to the '96 Cup. Yet it was his willingness to do things like clothesline Patrick Roy during the infamous regular season 1st Battle Royale that really showed the NHL that the Wings were no longer going to have Claudes like Lemieux mess with them anymore.

Project Zack Kassian aside the Canucks need to look at that model and see that unless you can combat Dustin Brown hits with your own hits + goals in the form of a Rick Nash, no Cups for you.

Or the Canucks have to look at the other version of the Red Wings. In both '04 and '06 the Wings got upset because of insane opposition goaltending. After finishing first overall in '03/04, the Wings knocked off the Nashville Predators in rd. one. Then in rd. two they got Mikka Kiprusoffed and the Calgary Flames moved onward to the Final.

After the lockout, the following season of '05/06 saw the Wings again finish first overall only in rd. one to meet the passive trap and Rollie the Goalie on that other NHL team from Alberta. The Edmonton Spoilers, of course, went on to the Final where they copied the Flames' act by losing the Final in seven.

In the '07 playoffs Detroit got back its mojo a bit and ran to the Conference Finals where it got beat by the rough-and-tough eventual champions Anaheim Ducks.

Right now there's a furor over how the NHL, especially in the West, has gone all defensive (if you can call "let the other team wear themselves out by firing over 40 shots at our goalie" a defensive strategy rather than calling it a "we're not very good but we have a great goalie" strategy--also known as the Halak Formula 2010) what with the goalies dominating round one in 2012 . . . which, of course, apparently has never happened in the history of the NHL first round of playoffs adds Jean-Sebastien Giguere, Steve Penney, Andy Moog and a cast of tens.

A Penney for your thoughts?

What happened after the Ducks, who led the NHL in truculence, won in 2007? The Detroit Red Wings and the Pittsburgh Penguins met in the 2008 and 2009 Finals.
So before you bemoan Canucks' GM Mike Gillis for saying he's sticking with the offence over defence jag and not going out and signing goons to take out other teams' top stars, these trends do go in cycles sometimes as short as a single season.

(Having said that, if "your" team is no longer in the playoffs, pray the Philadelphia Flyers win the Cup for all our eyeballs' sakes...or at least a team from the East as even the now-loathed-out-here Boston Bruins do score goals.)

The Wings, though, did not stand pat between 2004 and 2008. Pretty much every player over 30 in 2004 either retired, was released, traded or tried to run the Dallas Stars. The Red Wings remade almost two-thirds of their team. Of course, they had the ageless wonders in Nicklas Lidstrom and Chris Chelios to start with on the backline. They added Brian Rafalski, Nicklas Kronwall, Brad Stuart, Brett Lebda and Andreas Lilja back there.

In goal the tandem of Curtis Joseph and Manny Legace was replaced by returning Cup heroes Chris Osgood and Dominik Hasek. Surprisingly, despite Hasek starting in the playoffs, he was replaced after floundering in the first few games in round one and Osgood and his '08 playoff .930 save percentage was a key factor in the Wings' fourth Cup in 11 years.

Upfront, the Wings had Henrik Zetterberg and Pavel Datsyuk but in 2004 they were not quite the Zetterberg and Datsyuk of 2008. Datsyuk, as some may recall, was a struggling playoff performer as through '04 he had a measly 3 goals and 9 points in 37 playoff games. Zetterberg was only in his sophomore year in '03/04 so he had yet to even register with most Wings fans. This was still Steve Yzerman's team upfront.

That would change as the Wings swept out most of the oldster forwards (Yzerman, Shanahan, Brett Hull, Robert Lang), kept the Kris Draper-Kirk Maltby PK unit as well as Tomas Holmstrom around and added Johan Franzen, Valteri Filppula, Darren Helm (whom the Wings obviously missed after he got injured in rd. 1 this season), Jiri Hudler, Mikael Samuelsson, Dallas Drake and Daniel Cleary. They also brought back 35-year-old Darren McCarty (who had left as a free agent to sign with Calgary in '05) who managed to get into 17 games in the '08 playoff run.

Last, but maybe not least, the Wings decided their former assistant coach Dave Lewis (the man who replaced the legendary Scotty Bowman) turned out to be not really the man for the job. After firing Lewis, the Wings hired Mike Babcock who had led the extreme underdog '03 Ducks to the Final (J.S Giguere adds, "What am I? Chopped liver?").

So there you have it, Mike Gillis--a blueprint to a Cup. Whether it's finding that readymade diamond of a Shanny, somehow turning Alexander Edler into the next Lidstrom or making the Sedins younger (more on that in Part II tomorrow), you have your work cut out for you when this window officially closes in two years' time.

Puckheads Are Us

Canuckleheads R We!

If you're a Canuck fan by choice or by default, read on! If you aren't, then join us in our worship of things mediocre. Every decade or so we will take you on a wondrous rollercoaster ride to the great big cities of the East Coast where ultimately your hopes will be crushed. In between, sorry, we can't promise too much but at least we can say we were there through thin and thin.