Agency steps in to move Averies filth

THOUSANDS of tonnes of unburned rubbish has started to be forcibly taken from the site of the ongoing blaze at Averies Recycling.

Environment Agency contractors have begun shifting up to 3,000 tonnes of non-hazardous waste from the Marshgate site after the company failed to comply with orders to remove it themselves.

The waste, made up of mainly non-recyclable, commercial materials, is being moved by contractors from Hills Waste Solutions to the permitted landfill site in Chapel Farm, Blunsdon.

The removal will enable firefighters to tackle the blaze, which has been burning at the site for four weeks, more aggressively.

James Mahoney, area manager at Wiltshire Fire & Rescue Service, said: “Following enforcement action taken by the Environment Agency, control has been taken of the Marshgate site and work is underway to remove significant volumes of waste, which has precluded fire crews from being able to tackle the blaze full blast.

“In the coming days, it is hoped sufficient waste will have been taken away so this more intensified firefighting can begin.

“This is a long and complicated operation and we are grateful for the support and co-operation of residents and local businesses affected by the fire, which we all agree has been going on too long.

“Another step forward has been taken today and rest assured we’re working hard to minimise disruption and ensure normality can resume as soon as possible.

“Inevitably, the smoke means things will unfortunately seem worse before they get better and once again I thank everyone for their patience.”

The rubbish being shifted from the site will be checked and dampened as a precaution before it leaves Averies Recycling.

When firefighters intensify their work after its removal it is expected that the cloud of smoke over Swindon that built up during the initial stages of the fire will return.

Air quality levels will continue to be monitored daily by Swindon Council and Public Health England so that local people can be advised on any necessary health precautions.

Preparations are also underway to protect the drainage systems ahead of thousands of litres of water per minute being used to tackle the blaze, which started four weeks ago.

The waste transfer operation forms part of a multi-agency plan, which is being advanced by partner organisations committed to the joint aim of putting the fire out faster for local residents and businesses.

As of 08.00 this morning only 65 people have signed - it needs 1500 signatures to get the inquiry.

This story has run and run, and now it seems that ultimately we, the taxpayers, will end up footing the bill for this fiasco.
This is why it is important that we push for an inquiry into the events surrounding the fire, and its subsequent events.
Please sing the petition on SBC's website - link below:
http://ww5.swindon.g
ov.uk/moderngov/mgEP
etitionDisplay.aspx?
ID=19&RPID=3694199&H
PID=3694199
As of 08.00 this morning only 65 people have signed - it needs 1500 signatures to get the inquiry.Isthisthebestswindon cando

Isthisthebestswindon cando wrote:
This story has run and run, and now it seems that ultimately we, the taxpayers, will end up footing the bill for this fiasco.

This is why it is important that we push for an inquiry into the events surrounding the fire, and its subsequent events.

Please sing the petition on SBC's website - link below:

http://ww5.swindon.g

ov.uk/moderngov/mgEP

etitionDisplay.aspx?

ID=19&amp;RPID=36941
99&amp;H
PID=3694199

As of 08.00 this morning only 65 people have signed - it needs 1500 signatures to get the inquiry.

Why has this point got thumbs down?
Surely Swindon residents want an enquiry into this disaster and the reasons why this has taken so long to sort out?

[quote][p][bold]Isthisthebestswindon cando[/bold] wrote:
This story has run and run, and now it seems that ultimately we, the taxpayers, will end up footing the bill for this fiasco.
This is why it is important that we push for an inquiry into the events surrounding the fire, and its subsequent events.
Please sing the petition on SBC's website - link below:
http://ww5.swindon.g
ov.uk/moderngov/mgEP
etitionDisplay.aspx?
ID=19&RPID=36941
99&H
PID=3694199
As of 08.00 this morning only 65 people have signed - it needs 1500 signatures to get the inquiry.[/p][/quote]Why has this point got thumbs down?
Surely Swindon residents want an enquiry into this disaster and the reasons why this has taken so long to sort out?Alan Bast*rd

Isthisthebestswindon cando wrote:
This story has run and run, and now it seems that ultimately we, the taxpayers, will end up footing the bill for this fiasco.

This is why it is important that we push for an inquiry into the events surrounding the fire, and its subsequent events.

Please sing the petition on SBC's website - link below:

http://ww5.swindon.g

ov.uk/moderngov/mgEP

etitionDisplay.aspx?

ID=19&amp;RPID=36941
99&amp;H
PID=3694199

As of 08.00 this morning only 65 people have signed - it needs 1500 signatures to get the inquiry.

Agreed. An enquiry is essential. I've signed the petition.

[quote][p][bold]Isthisthebestswindon cando[/bold] wrote:
This story has run and run, and now it seems that ultimately we, the taxpayers, will end up footing the bill for this fiasco.
This is why it is important that we push for an inquiry into the events surrounding the fire, and its subsequent events.
Please sing the petition on SBC's website - link below:
http://ww5.swindon.g
ov.uk/moderngov/mgEP
etitionDisplay.aspx?
ID=19&RPID=36941
99&H
PID=3694199
As of 08.00 this morning only 65 people have signed - it needs 1500 signatures to get the inquiry.[/p][/quote]Agreed. An enquiry is essential. I've signed the petition.Sandor Clegane

it seems that there is somebody on this site today that against a enquiry as all previous posts supporting the petition have negative votes .i have signed the petition and urge all decent residents of swindon to also sign as we deserve answers as to what happened,Also can i suggest to those who have signed to pass it on to family and friends to sign.

it seems that there is somebody on this site today that against a enquiry as all previous posts supporting the petition have negative votes .i have signed the petition and urge all decent residents of swindon to also sign as we deserve answers as to what happened,Also can i suggest to those who have signed to pass it on to family and friends to sign.somwal25

The removal of this filth will no doubt obfuscate any chance of locating the source and method of ignition.

Why has so much rubbish been allowed to be dumped rather than taken to landfill where it should have gone in the first place.

How many other skip operations are similarly stockpiling rather than tipping at the proper place.

How does the Environment Agency issue 'licences' and what effective checking is carried out.

How did the suggestion to remove the filth to the vacant park and ride site emerge in the first place.

We should really be worried whenever we read that all these 'partner agencies' are 'working with' each other. Not only are there too many of them but whenever you read that bureau speak, you know there has been a failure and that they are moving to shift the buck.

There is a serious need for an independent review of these events.
The removal of this filth will no doubt obfuscate any chance of locating the source and method of ignition.
Why has so much rubbish been allowed to be dumped rather than taken to landfill where it should have gone in the first place.
How many other skip operations are similarly stockpiling rather than tipping at the proper place.
How does the Environment Agency issue 'licences' and what effective checking is carried out.
How did the suggestion to remove the filth to the vacant park and ride site emerge in the first place.
We should really be worried whenever we read that all these 'partner agencies' are 'working with' each other. Not only are there too many of them but whenever you read that bureau speak, you know there has been a failure and that they are moving to shift the buck.Brunoh

Alan Bast*rd wrote:
Clearly someone is tampering with the voting system in here. Opinions are for an enquiry so it's obvious it's being manipulated by an individual

I know that Davey Gravey had admitted to always voting down my posts without even reading them, although he's been strangely quiet of late. I'm sure you wouldn't know anything about that, though.

[quote][p][bold]Alan Bast*rd[/bold] wrote:
Clearly someone is tampering with the voting system in here. Opinions are for an enquiry so it's obvious it's being manipulated by an individual[/p][/quote]I know that Davey Gravey had admitted to always voting down my posts without even reading them, although he's been strangely quiet of late. I'm sure you wouldn't know anything about that, though.Sandor Clegane

Sorry folks I did say when this was mooted originally it was unlikely to have enough signatures.
However I also said a friend of mine with a lung disorder has sent black powder collected on fans and flat surfaces in his home for examination and has contacted a solicitor--not one of the ambulance chaser type--and it seems household insurance may cover costs. I would advise anyone affected to take advice now. Good luck to all.

Sorry folks I did say when this was mooted originally it was unlikely to have enough signatures.
However I also said a friend of mine with a lung disorder has sent black powder collected on fans and flat surfaces in his home for examination and has contacted a solicitor--not one of the ambulance chaser type--and it seems household insurance may cover costs. I would advise anyone affected to take advice now. Good luck to all.messyits

Alan Bast*rd wrote:
Clearly someone is tampering with the voting system in here. Opinions are for an enquiry so it's obvious it's being manipulated by an individual

I know that Davey Gravey had admitted to always voting down my posts without even reading them, although he's been strangely quiet of late. I'm sure you wouldn't know anything about that, though.

I've not read that admission on here at all. kindly point out where it is?
I've read many claims against you though and have it on good authority that an investigation is ongoing due to account mirroring and other site abuses.

[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Alan Bast*rd[/bold] wrote:
Clearly someone is tampering with the voting system in here. Opinions are for an enquiry so it's obvious it's being manipulated by an individual[/p][/quote]I know that Davey Gravey had admitted to always voting down my posts without even reading them, although he's been strangely quiet of late. I'm sure you wouldn't know anything about that, though.[/p][/quote]I've not read that admission on here at all. kindly point out where it is?
I've read many claims against you though and have it on good authority that an investigation is ongoing due to account mirroring and other site abuses.Alan Bast*rd

The removal of this filth will no doubt obfuscate any chance of locating the source and method of ignition.

Why has so much rubbish been allowed to be dumped rather than taken to landfill where it should have gone in the first place.

How many other skip operations are stockpiling similarly, rather than tipping at the proper place.

How does the Environment Agency issue 'licences' and what effective checking is carried out.

How did the suggestion to remove the filth to the vacant park and ride site emerge in the first place.

We should really be worried whenever we read that all these 'partner agencies' are 'working with' each other. Not only are there too many of them but whenever you read that bureau speak, you know that they are moving to shift the buck.

There is a serious need for an independent review of these events.
The removal of this filth will no doubt obfuscate any chance of locating the source and method of ignition.
Why has so much rubbish been allowed to be dumped rather than taken to landfill where it should have gone in the first place.
How many other skip operations are stockpiling similarly, rather than tipping at the proper place.
How does the Environment Agency issue 'licences' and what effective checking is carried out.
How did the suggestion to remove the filth to the vacant park and ride site emerge in the first place.
We should really be worried whenever we read that all these 'partner agencies' are 'working with' each other. Not only are there too many of them but whenever you read that bureau speak, you know that they are moving to shift the buck.Brunoh

Alan Bast*rd wrote:
Clearly someone is tampering with the voting system in here. Opinions are for an enquiry so it's obvious it's being manipulated by an individual

I know that Davey Gravey had admitted to always voting down my posts without even reading them, although he's been strangely quiet of late. I'm sure you wouldn't know anything about that, though.

I've not read that admission on here at all. kindly point out where it is?
I've read many claims against you though and have it on good authority that an investigation is ongoing due to account mirroring and other site abuses.

Morning Davey.

[quote][p][bold]Alan Bast*rd[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Sandor Clegane[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Alan Bast*rd[/bold] wrote:
Clearly someone is tampering with the voting system in here. Opinions are for an enquiry so it's obvious it's being manipulated by an individual[/p][/quote]I know that Davey Gravey had admitted to always voting down my posts without even reading them, although he's been strangely quiet of late. I'm sure you wouldn't know anything about that, though.[/p][/quote]I've not read that admission on here at all. kindly point out where it is?
I've read many claims against you though and have it on good authority that an investigation is ongoing due to account mirroring and other site abuses.[/p][/quote]Morning Davey.Sandor Clegane

Now revoke Averies' licence and shut them down. Make them pay for the removal of this waste.

Sack the EA idiot responsible for allowing them to keep their licence after they'd been warned of safety breaches.

This must never be allowed to happen again and yes, we do need an inquiry into this fiasco. I've signed the petition also.

Now revoke Averies' licence and shut them down. Make them pay for the removal of this waste.
Sack the EA idiot responsible for allowing them to keep their licence after they'd been warned of safety breaches.
This must never be allowed to happen again and yes, we do need an inquiry into this fiasco. I've signed the petition also.Moth

Brunoh wrote:
There is a serious need for an independent review of these events.

The removal of this filth will no doubt obfuscate any chance of locating the source and method of ignition.

Why has so much rubbish been allowed to be dumped rather than taken to landfill where it should have gone in the first place.

How many other skip operations are similarly stockpiling rather than tipping at the proper place.

How does the Environment Agency issue 'licences' and what effective checking is carried out.

How did the suggestion to remove the filth to the vacant park and ride site emerge in the first place.

We should really be worried whenever we read that all these 'partner agencies' are 'working with' each other. Not only are there too many of them but whenever you read that bureau speak, you know there has been a failure and that they are moving to shift the buck.

Very good post. As they say too many cooks spoil the broth, with this many different companies and agencies, is it any wonder it has taken this long to actually do something (most of whom don't seem to have a clue which makes it worse). I think what we need to know is where the buck actually stops and deal with them appropriately. Incidentally just seen an Averies lorry drive by!

[quote][p][bold]Brunoh[/bold] wrote:
There is a serious need for an independent review of these events.
The removal of this filth will no doubt obfuscate any chance of locating the source and method of ignition.
Why has so much rubbish been allowed to be dumped rather than taken to landfill where it should have gone in the first place.
How many other skip operations are similarly stockpiling rather than tipping at the proper place.
How does the Environment Agency issue 'licences' and what effective checking is carried out.
How did the suggestion to remove the filth to the vacant park and ride site emerge in the first place.
We should really be worried whenever we read that all these 'partner agencies' are 'working with' each other. Not only are there too many of them but whenever you read that bureau speak, you know there has been a failure and that they are moving to shift the buck.[/p][/quote]Very good post. As they say too many cooks spoil the broth, with this many different companies and agencies, is it any wonder it has taken this long to actually do something (most of whom don't seem to have a clue which makes it worse). I think what we need to know is where the buck actually stops and deal with them appropriately. Incidentally just seen an Averies lorry drive by!house on the hill

Ok this story has run and run and who's fault it is. Ok the fire was an accident waiting to happen, not having fire breaks between waste piles storing waste/wood against buildings containing flammable/hazardous liquids. But what if the Fire Brigade wasn't on strike and when the Cricklade crew that turn up first just run their hose out and contained the fire ( that at the time was no more than in a 10-15 meter vicinity) rather than **** foot around planning their approach to the situation that fire would of been out that night. So the fire speed and the the Environmental Agency hampered it by stopping the Fire Brigade putting it out 'fact' full stop! Maybe the Adver should stop being so biased in their reporting and get the complete facts instead of relying on hearsay. I feel for all the residents in the area and hope they put claims in with all the ambulance chasing law firms, cause I wouldn't want it on my back door! I also agree Lee Averies should be shut down and if you search for anyone in Swindon (or Shepton Mallet) that has a good word to say about him you will not find one! Enough said!

Ok this story has run and run and who's fault it is. Ok the fire was an accident waiting to happen, not having fire breaks between waste piles storing waste/wood against buildings containing flammable/hazardous liquids. But what if the Fire Brigade wasn't on strike and when the Cricklade crew that turn up first just run their hose out and contained the fire ( that at the time was no more than in a 10-15 meter vicinity) rather than **** foot around planning their approach to the situation that fire would of been out that night. So the fire speed and the the Environmental Agency hampered it by stopping the Fire Brigade putting it out 'fact' full stop! Maybe the Adver should stop being so biased in their reporting and get the complete facts instead of relying on hearsay. I feel for all the residents in the area and hope they put claims in with all the ambulance chasing law firms, cause I wouldn't want it on my back door! I also agree Lee Averies should be shut down and if you search for anyone in Swindon (or Shepton Mallet) that has a good word to say about him you will not find one! Enough said!Naughty Nick

Naughty Nick wrote:
Ok this story has run and run and who's fault it is. Ok the fire was an accident waiting to happen, not having fire breaks between waste piles storing waste/wood against buildings containing flammable/hazardous liquids. But what if the Fire Brigade wasn't on strike and when the Cricklade crew that turn up first just run their hose out and contained the fire ( that at the time was no more than in a 10-15 meter vicinity) rather than **** foot around planning their approach to the situation that fire would of been out that night. So the fire speed and the the Environmental Agency hampered it by stopping the Fire Brigade putting it out 'fact' full stop! Maybe the Adver should stop being so biased in their reporting and get the complete facts instead of relying on hearsay. I feel for all the residents in the area and hope they put claims in with all the ambulance chasing law firms, cause I wouldn't want it on my back door! I also agree Lee Averies should be shut down and if you search for anyone in Swindon (or Shepton Mallet) that has a good word to say about him you will not find one! Enough said!

Oh yeah, let's blame the firefighters again for protecting their fair & paid for pensions... I didn't know you were an expert on fire spread on industrial recycling sites? Who's relying on hearsay and guesswork now eh?

[quote][p][bold]Naughty Nick[/bold] wrote:
Ok this story has run and run and who's fault it is. Ok the fire was an accident waiting to happen, not having fire breaks between waste piles storing waste/wood against buildings containing flammable/hazardous liquids. But what if the Fire Brigade wasn't on strike and when the Cricklade crew that turn up first just run their hose out and contained the fire ( that at the time was no more than in a 10-15 meter vicinity) rather than **** foot around planning their approach to the situation that fire would of been out that night. So the fire speed and the the Environmental Agency hampered it by stopping the Fire Brigade putting it out 'fact' full stop! Maybe the Adver should stop being so biased in their reporting and get the complete facts instead of relying on hearsay. I feel for all the residents in the area and hope they put claims in with all the ambulance chasing law firms, cause I wouldn't want it on my back door! I also agree Lee Averies should be shut down and if you search for anyone in Swindon (or Shepton Mallet) that has a good word to say about him you will not find one! Enough said![/p][/quote]Oh yeah, let's blame the firefighters again for protecting their fair & paid for pensions... I didn't know you were an expert on fire spread on industrial recycling sites? Who's relying on hearsay and guesswork now eh?Blind Fury

Forgot to say this so called 'Environmental' Agency have no regard to air quality, they have all the implements onsite to pump any dirty water away to stop any pollute to mediate rivers/streams so ask them why they haven't? Everyone's after browny points!

Forgot to say this so called 'Environmental' Agency have no regard to air quality, they have all the implements onsite to pump any dirty water away to stop any pollute to mediate rivers/streams so ask them why they haven't? Everyone's after browny points!Naughty Nick

Naughty Nick wrote:
Ok this story has run and run and who's fault it is. Ok the fire was an accident waiting to happen, not having fire breaks between waste piles storing waste/wood against buildings containing flammable/hazardous liquids. But what if the Fire Brigade wasn't on strike and when the Cricklade crew that turn up first just run their hose out and contained the fire ( that at the time was no more than in a 10-15 meter vicinity) rather than **** foot around planning their approach to the situation that fire would of been out that night. So the fire speed and the the Environmental Agency hampered it by stopping the Fire Brigade putting it out 'fact' full stop! Maybe the Adver should stop being so biased in their reporting and get the complete facts instead of relying on hearsay. I feel for all the residents in the area and hope they put claims in with all the ambulance chasing law firms, cause I wouldn't want it on my back door! I also agree Lee Averies should be shut down and if you search for anyone in Swindon (or Shepton Mallet) that has a good word to say about him you will not find one! Enough said!

Oh yeah, let's blame the firefighters again for protecting their fair &amp; paid for pensions... I didn't know you were an expert on fire spread on industrial recycling sites? Who's relying on hearsay and guesswork now eh?

Funny enough I am

[quote][p][bold]Blind Fury[/bold] wrote:
[quote][p][bold]Naughty Nick[/bold] wrote:
Ok this story has run and run and who's fault it is. Ok the fire was an accident waiting to happen, not having fire breaks between waste piles storing waste/wood against buildings containing flammable/hazardous liquids. But what if the Fire Brigade wasn't on strike and when the Cricklade crew that turn up first just run their hose out and contained the fire ( that at the time was no more than in a 10-15 meter vicinity) rather than **** foot around planning their approach to the situation that fire would of been out that night. So the fire speed and the the Environmental Agency hampered it by stopping the Fire Brigade putting it out 'fact' full stop! Maybe the Adver should stop being so biased in their reporting and get the complete facts instead of relying on hearsay. I feel for all the residents in the area and hope they put claims in with all the ambulance chasing law firms, cause I wouldn't want it on my back door! I also agree Lee Averies should be shut down and if you search for anyone in Swindon (or Shepton Mallet) that has a good word to say about him you will not find one! Enough said![/p][/quote]Oh yeah, let's blame the firefighters again for protecting their fair & paid for pensions... I didn't know you were an expert on fire spread on industrial recycling sites? Who's relying on hearsay and guesswork now eh?[/p][/quote]Funny enough I amNaughty Nick

Naughty Nick wrote:
Ok this story has run and run and who's fault it is. Ok the fire was an accident waiting to happen, not having fire breaks between waste piles storing waste/wood against buildings containing flammable/hazardous liquids. But what if the Fire Brigade wasn't on strike and when the Cricklade crew that turn up first just run their hose out and contained the fire ( that at the time was no more than in a 10-15 meter vicinity) rather than **** foot around planning their approach to the situation that fire would of been out that night. So the fire speed and the the Environmental Agency hampered it by stopping the Fire Brigade putting it out 'fact' full stop! Maybe the Adver should stop being so biased in their reporting and get the complete facts instead of relying on hearsay. I feel for all the residents in the area and hope they put claims in with all the ambulance chasing law firms, cause I wouldn't want it on my back door! I also agree Lee Averies should be shut down and if you search for anyone in Swindon (or Shepton Mallet) that has a good word to say about him you will not find one! Enough said!

Errrrr...Don't you still continue to work for Mr Lee Averies ??...As for blaming the environment for this disaster ...shame on YOU !! .. You and I are both aware of the nature of the beast 'Mr Lee Averies' .!!...Whilst I will not lay blame at his feet for the fire ...he and only he is to be blame for the state of the Marshgate Site ...for hoarding rubbish and pocketing the monies...for treating ALL staff as dirt on the bottom of his shoe....Some employees are still waiting for him to have the decency to call them to tell them they no longer have a job !!?? !!!!

[quote][p][bold]Naughty Nick[/bold] wrote:
Ok this story has run and run and who's fault it is. Ok the fire was an accident waiting to happen, not having fire breaks between waste piles storing waste/wood against buildings containing flammable/hazardous liquids. But what if the Fire Brigade wasn't on strike and when the Cricklade crew that turn up first just run their hose out and contained the fire ( that at the time was no more than in a 10-15 meter vicinity) rather than **** foot around planning their approach to the situation that fire would of been out that night. So the fire speed and the the Environmental Agency hampered it by stopping the Fire Brigade putting it out 'fact' full stop! Maybe the Adver should stop being so biased in their reporting and get the complete facts instead of relying on hearsay. I feel for all the residents in the area and hope they put claims in with all the ambulance chasing law firms, cause I wouldn't want it on my back door! I also agree Lee Averies should be shut down and if you search for anyone in Swindon (or Shepton Mallet) that has a good word to say about him you will not find one! Enough said![/p][/quote]Errrrr...Don't you still continue to work for Mr Lee Averies ??...As for blaming the environment for this disaster ...shame on YOU !! .. You and I are both aware of the nature of the beast 'Mr Lee Averies' .!!...Whilst I will not lay blame at his feet for the fire ...he and only he is to be blame for the state of the Marshgate Site ...for hoarding rubbish and pocketing the monies...for treating ALL staff as dirt on the bottom of his shoe....Some employees are still waiting for him to have the decency to call them to tell them they no longer have a job !!?? !!!!princesshelen68