Revelations concerning the origins and
connections of the alleged liquid bomb terror plot to Pakistan and the 7/7
bombings in London provide a strong indication that the operation, known
for months yet deliberately timed for public release, was a synthetic ruse
concocted by the Bush/Blair cabal to re-package the flagging war on terror.

Media
reports in the days following the alert cite Pakistan's ISI
as having identified Rashid Rauf as, "the link between the plot's planners
and British-based Muslims who were allegedly preparing to carry out attacks
on transatlantic flights."

According to former NSA official Wayne
Madsen, the Lashkar-e-Toiba terror group, to which Rashid
Rauf is affiliated, is wholly operated and funded by the Pakistani ISI.

The Pakistani ISI is a CIA front and controls
terror cells at the discretion of the highest levels of the US military-industrial
complex. This means that the potential mastermind of the liquid bomb plot,
Rashid Rauf (pictured), was operating under the oversight and direction
of Pakistani and by proxy American intelligence agencies.

To understand why the Pakistan link strongly
indicates that Thursday morning's terror alert was a manufactured ruse,
it is necessary to understand the the nexus that connects Pakistani intelligence,
the CIA and terrorist organizations.

In October 2001, under the headline 'Pakistani
Intelligence Had Links to Al Qaeda, U.S. Officials Say,' the New
York Times reported, "The intelligence service of Pakistan,
a crucial American ally in the war on terrorism, has had an indirect but
longstanding relationship with Al Qaeda, turning a blind eye for years to
the growing ties between Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, according to American
officials."

Funds transferred from Pakistan bankrolled
the alleged 9/11 hijackers before the attack. Ahmad Umar Sheikh wired $100,000
from Karachi to alleged lead hijacker Mohammed Atta at the
behest of ISI chief Mahmoud Ahmad. If this isn't a direct link
from the ISI to Al-Qaeda then nothing is.

Porter Goss, later appointed as director
of the CIA, was
having breakfast with the money man behind the terrorists as
the planes crashed on the morning of 9/11. Ahmad had
also met with top defense and intelligence officials in Washington
in the days before the attack, including then CIA director George Tenet,
Pentagon officials, and White House personnel.

The fact that the Pakistani financier
of the alleged hijackers was meeting with the top brass of the US government
in the week before the attack was never investigated by the 9/11 Commission.

In addition, alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid
Shaikh Mohammed was repeatedly protected by the ISI, according
to Josef Bodansky, the director of the Congressional Task Force
on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare.

Defense
Intelligence Agency documents dated from 2001 clearly indicate
that the CIA is aware that Pakistan's ISI supports and bankrolls Al-Qaeda
groups but they have deliberately chosen to ignore the connection.

This rich history of ISI creation and
protection of terrorist cells, allied with the fact that the ISI is a known
CIA front, and added to the revelation that the mastermind of the liquid
bomb plot Rashid Rauf is under ISI control, it is therefore obvious to conclude
that the entire charade was cooked and orchestrated by elements of the Bush/Blair
cabal and sold as promotional propaganda for the increased surveillance
and behavioral control of UK and US citizens.

At the very least, the terror cell had
been fully infiltrated for months - this has already been admitted - and
the snap "foiling" of the attack was coordinated and stage-managed
for purposes of political grandstanding on the part of Bush, Blair and the
Neo-Fascist apparatus that seeks to use the ailing justification of the
war on terror for a future military incursion into Iran.

Another dimension to the indication that
we are being fed another hoax, are reports
detailing the alleged plot's links to the 7/7 London bombings.

As this website has exhaustively
documented for over a year, the 7/7 bombings and the patsies
that were used to take the fall for them, were controlled and engineered
by the British intelligence apparatus.

The alleged ringleader of the attack which
targeted three tube trains and one bus, Mohammed Siddique Khan, was an MI5 informant, according to former London Metropolitan
Police detective and terror expert Charles Shoebridge. Therefore, in the
case of the liquid bomb plot suspects, any link to the London bombers is
a link to MI5.

It is clear that the scope of the attack
has been greatly exaggerated by the British government to maximize fear
and subservience engendered by images of alarmed and frightened airliner
passengers.

Doomsday proclamations of ten planes exploding
into balls of flames in mid-air do not correlate with the capacity of the
liquid explosives the alleged terrorists were to use.

The only other example where terrorists
used liquid explosives was the December 1994 Philippines Airline Boeing
747 incident, a dry run for a bigger plot conducted by Ramzi Youssef.

In this case, Youssef planted the explosives
explosives under one of the seats in the airliner and timed them to detonate
after he disembarked for a connecting flight. The subsequent explosion killed
only the Japanese businessman who was sitting directly above the bomb. Besides
five people with minor injuries, the other 200-plus passengers were unharmed
and the plane landed safely.

Only liquid explosives in large and noticeable
amounts can have any literal chance of "blowing up" a plane in
mid-air. Confiscating pregnant white women's lip gloss is completely insane
and proves in itself that the new airport measures are purely designed to
act as a PR coup for the police state.

In addition, photographs
of passengers being ordered to pour liquids into one single
container completely belies the claim that the alleged terrorists planned
to mix the liquids to create the deadly explosives. If mixing liquids was
a key component of the bomb making process then why are airport security
ordering people to mix liquids?

World Affairs Brief editor Joel Skousen
highlights prescient questions about the inconsistencies of the properties
of the alleged liquid explosives in relation to the much vaunted scale of
the foiled attack.

"The supposed explosive device this
time was a Peroxide-based explosive, which is mildly explosive and can be
prepared from acetone, hydrogen Peroxide, and an acid catalyst. This type
is claimed by governments to be "widely in use by terrorist groups,"
though we have no known terrorist events where it has been used, except
by one Palestinian terrorist, and then as a detonator only-not as the main
charge. This explosive material is usually known by its abbreviation TATP
(Tri Acetone Tri Peroxide)," writes
Skousen.

"Both Peroxide and Acetone are clear liquids, but acetone (laquer thinner)
is easily identifiable by smell and its high rate of evaporation. Experts
indicate it is very unstable and highly unlikely to be a stand-alone explosive
to take down an airliner. The quantities would have to be large enough to
be easily noticed. Thus, even though this is a theoretical threat, banning
all cosmetics and lotions is stupid and banning all liquids is unnecessary.
Only clear liquids need checking. There is cheap test equipment for TATP,
and simple ways for TSA employees to quickly check for acetone and peroxide."

Returning to how the latest plot is a
mirror image of Operation Bojinka - the Ramzi Youssef link is also telling
because Youssef has been protected and coddled by the US government at every
juncture.

In September of 1992 Youssef entered
the US with Ahmad Ajaj. Ajaj's luggage contained documents on how to make
bombs and was stuffed with fake passports and ID's. Ajaj was arrested -
amazingly Youssef was released.

Youssef later masterminded the WTC '93 bombing with
the gracious help of FBI agents. Having penetrated the group before the
bombing, the FBI's mole, Emad Salem, was told to arm the terror cell with
dummy explosives so a sting operation could ensnare the perpetrators. Salem
was mystified when the orders changed, the sting was called off and the
FBI allowed the bombing to go forward. This was all admitted in an October
1993 New York Times front page story.

Again, any Operation Bojinka or Ramzi Youssef link
in the case of the liquid bomb plot is a link back to western intelligence
agencies.

Within three days of its exposure, Tony
Blair and MI5 are already milking
the alleged plot for political purposes in re-introducing the
argument for 90-day detention without charge legislation. Blair suffered
his only defeat to date in the Commons last November when the bill was shot
down by Labour rebels - a humiliating rejection of the so-called 'liberal'
government's feverish bloodlust for authoritarian control.

Reports of criminal insider trading on
airline stocks before the announcement of the alleged foiled plot, specifically
British Airways stocks, have also started to filter in and will be the subject
of a follow-up investigation.