It creates a solar wind stream which hits earth the same as a flare would, but with far less of an impact for the most part.

A day or two after a CH faces Earth directly, we can expect an uptick in temp, solar wind speed, and density which our magnetosphere then pumps up to protect earth from.

Recently, solar wind streams from CHs have been weak to non existent.

Quoting: TS66

maybe the data you are reading is false

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 831180

The data today ?? No, looks like we are actually getting some action, all 3 are up. However, CHs, for whatever reason have been lacking any integrity for the past several weeks, and have come and gone without going beyond 350/kms.

This is a good thing.

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 831180

what i am saying is that nasa mess about and blur the picture by putting false data on the sites that you guys research....i dont trust them at all,nasa are sneaky b2stards(as i am sure you know)

something massive is happening,so huge ,so big its a true historic event,the power grid is going to fry

Edit

Quoting: TS66

It certainly don't believe it is out of the realm of consideration, and no I don't trust government to ever tell us the whole truth.

After watching for these past two years, the most I've seen are massive data gaps, at the most inopportune moments (depending on your perspective of course).

Maybe it is just a flick of a switch to fudge the data ??? I'm not sure how many solar data links you have, but there is a lot of data to fudge out there.

My biggest red flag would be to see a multitude of posters commenting on the aurora, especially observed lower latitude auroras, and no solar data from the space agencies to explain it ....

Agreed TS. I've watched for aurora sittings further south than the average without events for a cause, haven't seen anything for serious alarm, but they do with old data as we all know.Peace and good day hon!