If they broke the law, arrest them and put them on trial. Same goes for Trump and his gang. If we are going to drain the swamp, that means all the
water goes. Not just the water from one party. Good? Good.

If they broke the law, arrest them and put them on trial. Same goes for Trump and his gang. If we are going to drain the swamp, that means all the
water goes. Not just the water from one party. Good? Good.

I mean, i get the need to make sure you throw in the whatabout.

But consider: there is not a single credible piece of information circulating that Trump has committed a crime. Further, the SC himself, along with
the deputy AG and FBI Director all have come out to say that Trump was never the focus of the investigation to begin with, and still is not.

So while your exuberance is noted, i'd remind you not to confuse conflation with the hard evidence that is coming out about the prior administration
and its henchmen.

If they broke the law, arrest them and put them on trial. Same goes for Trump and his gang. If we are going to drain the swamp, that means all the
water goes. Not just the water from one party. Good? Good.

Right this is what I have been saying all along

So let’s get a special counsel looking in to comey and his cronies, and all of Hillary’s people, and all of those Obama’s people as well

And let’s make sure it’s made up primarily of trump donors

And let’s leave them wiretap and spy on all of those groups

And let’s have raids if their lawyers offices

And don’t forget looking back decades at any possible financial crimes

If they broke the law, arrest them and put them on trial. Same goes for Trump and his gang. If we are going to drain the swamp, that means all the
water goes. Not just the water from one party. Good? Good.

Right this is what I have been saying all along

So let’s get a special counsel looking in to comey and his cronies, and all of Hillary’s people, and all of those Obama’s people as well

And let’s make sure it’s made up primarily of trump donors

And let’s leave them wiretap and spy on all of those groups

And let’s have raids if their lawyers offices

And don’t forget looking back decades at any possible financial crimes

I mean, you don’t want the treatment just for one side now, right?

I couldn't type all that with a straight face. Equal treatment under the law? Foreign concept to some on here.

If they broke the law, arrest them and put them on trial. Same goes for Trump and his gang. If we are going to drain the swamp, that means all the
water goes. Not just the water from one party. Good? Good.

Oh look a liberal waking up but still sounding bitter about being brainwashed

If they broke the law, arrest them and put them on trial. Same goes for Trump and his gang. If we are going to drain the swamp, that means all the
water goes. Not just the water from one party. Good? Good.

I mean, i get the need to make sure you throw in the whatabout.

But consider: there is not a single credible piece of information circulating that Trump has committed a crime. Further, the SC himself, along with
the deputy AG and FBI Director all have come out to say that Trump was never the focus of the investigation to begin with, and still is not.

So while your exuberance is noted, i'd remind you not to confuse conflation with the hard evidence that is coming out about the prior administration
and its henchmen.

Trump may not be the focus but he is still in fact largely involved in the investigation. You almost made it seem that he is not involved but after I
reread your post I noticed that is not what you said. Personally I believe that the scope of this investigation is focused on people that surround
Trump. And as much as you would like to call Obamas cabinet members henchmen the same can be said for Trump.

If they broke the law, arrest them and put them on trial. Same goes for Trump and his gang. If we are going to drain the swamp, that means all the
water goes. Not just the water from one party. Good? Good.

I mean, i get the need to make sure you throw in the whatabout.

But consider: there is not a single credible piece of information circulating that Trump has committed a crime. Further, the SC himself, along with
the deputy AG and FBI Director all have come out to say that Trump was never the focus of the investigation to begin with, and still is not.

So while your exuberance is noted, i'd remind you not to confuse conflation with the hard evidence that is coming out about the prior administration
and its henchmen.

Trump may not be the focus but he is still in fact largely involved in the investigation. You almost made it seem that he is not involved but after I
reread your post I noticed that is not what you said. Personally I believe that the scope of this investigation is focused on people that surround
Trump. And as much as you would like to call Obamas cabinet members henchmen the same can be said for Trump.

Great

Then again, I am sure you are disgusted by the only double standard that matters, that of law enforcement and the investigators in these two
situations

When will obama have his team wiretapped, lawyers raided, finances be looked at going back decades, etc?

I didn’t defend Obama just pointed out the obvious. If and I am sure he did do wrong then yes bring him and whoever involved to justice. I have yet
to see validated proof of this, just a bunch of accusations.

Thanks for starting this thread! Was hoping you'd get the hint I sent while I was driving, and received this alert.

After seeing the video of Loretta Lynch telling Dims to riot in the streets, it's easy to believe that she'd think nothing of ordering government
cronies to break the law...and extorting the NYPD. (Assuming she received lord Obama's approval, of course.)

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.