The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you’ve been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects.

After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time.

The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.

A few months later, you go to trial.

The charges haven’t been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted.

When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you..

Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man.

It doesn’t take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.

The judge sentences you to life in prison.

This case really happened.

On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second.

In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term…

How did it become a crime to defend one’s own life in the once great British Empire ?

It started with the Pistols Act of 1903.

This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license.
The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns..

Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.

Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerfordmass shooting in 1987.

Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw.

When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.

The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of “gun control”, demanded even tougher restrictions.
(The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)

Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.

For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals.
Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners.
Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns.
The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens.

During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism.
Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun.
Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.

Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying,
“We cannot have people take the law into their own hands.”

All of Martin’s neighbors had been robbed numerous times,
and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences.
Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.

When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities.

Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law.
The few who didn’t were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn’t comply.

Police later bragged that they’d taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.

How did the authorities know who had handguns?
The guns had been registered and licensed.
Kind of like cars. Sound familiar?

WAKE UP AMERICA ; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.

“…It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds..”
–Samuel Adams

If you think this is important, please forward to everyone you know.

You had better wake up, because Obama is doing this very same thing, over here, if he can get it done
The UN Small Arms Treaty that Hilary is negotiating would take away our 2nd Amendment rights.

And there are stupid people in congress and on the street that will go right along with him.
——————————————————————————————————–
Just remember – the reason the Japanese didn’t invade the USA is because they knew that most of the citizens were armed.

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

7 Comments:

That’s amazing! It’s impossible for me to conceptualize why people are so stupid. They don’t have a mindset for what liberalism is, like they are simple minded. It’s like when Eve ate the forbidden fruit (her own children), WHY DID SHE DO THIS? Simple minded, and so was her man, he herded about by her the two of them acting like dumb farm animals… Oh yeah, huh?

We must / have to protect our right to bear arms … sign petitions , join GOA , NRA , go to protest and call people in government … also try to educate people and tell them to educate their people .

Adam & Eve … in some ways they were set up . But , whatever it gets complicated … but if you read closely you will notice the serpent tells the truth and the godS of of the garden lie … it’s different though if read in Hebrew .

But that’s off topic … protect your / our rights , this is the line in the sand .

The Bill of Rights is the mechanism through which the Declaration and Constitution manifests. Amendments 11- 27 are the liberal agenda. They can not constitutionally change the Bill of Rights, but they can write those which superimposed upon the former are am\n attempt to repatriate. The Bil of Rights is constitutional government. Amendments 11- 27 are liberalism. When people figure this out, they’ll begin organizing militia. Be very clear here in your understanding.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS IS CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT PRINCIPLED ON OUR REPUBLIC AND SUBORDINATES HUMANITARIANISM AND DEMOCRATIC PROCESS TO PROCESS OF LAW.

AMENDMENTS 11- 27 ARE LIBERALISM AND SUBORDINATE THE BILL OF RIGHTS TO HUMANITARIANISM AND DEMOCRATIC PROCESS IN ABEYANCE OF THE RULE OF LAW.

He’s exactly right. It’s not about gun control, assault rifles, handguns, or pea-shooters -that’s merely a smokescreen. It’s ALL about the rights of the PEOPLE to protect themselves against tyranny.

Don’t forget what precipitated the American Revolution – the final straw was when the king’s Hessian mercenaries were ordered to disarm the colonial militia at Lexington and Concord by confiscating their muskets and pistols. Unfair taxation without representation was one thing – take away the means to protect life and liberty – guns, powder and shot??? That, my friends, is WAR!!

The prime directive of tyrannical government is occult rendition the application of which is child sacrifice and the black mass. People are too confused about this, and in this helpless state of mind are chasing their tails with this issue.

Liberals can not get away with this if you are armed, and then YOU have to have the sensibility to understand this is the reason for all the convoluted tactics they use to institutionalize this macabre practice in the first place.

Often as I ask this question in person, I have yet for anyone to know the answer. What is the process by which liberal politicians have institutionalized occult rendition in the US? People don’t know. They can parrot truism about the Bill of Rights, but they have no idea about occult rendition. This is a foreign language to them. knows.

The process by which liberal sociopaths have institutionalized occult rendition in the US is anti-terror legislation 1974- 2011 commemorated on the abductions of 11 young women across the US whose contributions to this macabre enterprise was the black mass.

Now many will argue with that out the gate, because they are literal minded and STUCK on a status quo interpretation of the problem, They know and believe such remarks as, “They will get my guns when they pry them from my cold, dead fingers,” but the truth, no.

The Mormon church is the alpha false flag domestic terrorism SSO in the world, and it’s sacrifice protocol is the black mass. You’ll argue with this, because it’s not what you were taught, nor will you apply what you now understand about liberalism, because you’re stupid.

I’m sorry, but the call to arms is an impossibility, too, because you don’t have a militia.

Now let me explain something to you to accelerate your mind and hopefully motivate you to look closer at the reality between the constitutionalist and liberal. First, there are the only two real and viable political parties in the US. You’ve been distracted by liberal propaganda that the two party system is republican and democrat. Incorrect. WRONG. Forget that.

The two party system is constitutionalist, which everyone alleges to be, and the liberal, which everyone complains about but what through liberal malingering has managed to infuse itself into US political and domestic infrastructures on your buck and with your cooperation.

You recently had the opportunity to elect a constitutionalist and did not. you like the slick propaganda of the incumbent albeit you IMAGINED this individual to be a constitutionalist, which he is not, AND he’s proving himself a worthy asset for the monarchy by taking out the 2nd amendment. What are people doing about it? Midnight candlelight prayer vigils in Washington. In other words, N-O-T-H-I-N-G.

Let me make you aware of something that’s a game changer in these circumstances that regardless of people becoming aware of this it will take them the next 100 years to understand what this means.

The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments of the constitution and is immutable. It is constitutionally illegal to change any one of these: however, liberals came up with idea that they could produce repatriation via the amendment process, which amendments 12- 27 are the liberal agenda. Literally, 12- 27 hail from the monarchy with liberal politicians debauchery pledged in perpetuity under threat of death for redaction. They get unchecked access to money, drugs and sex, and the monarchy gets proxy signatures to legislation which serves the mission of repatriation.

And what’s the point of this? You need proof about sacrifice. Google Queen Elizabeth involvement in the sacrifice of Canadian Aboriginal children 1966- 74 for your proof. There’s a lot of literature on these abductions with some of these writers leading readers to believe there’s an international court of justice on these horrific crimes. THERE’S NOTHING! there is absolutely no accountability for this macabre. NONE! Now connect the dots.

They want your guns so they can take our young women and children for their BDSM/pedophilia entertainment, which THIS is the reason for amendments 12- 27.

Awake yet, sleepyheads? The Game plan is and always has been occult rendition. Bilderberg is the Council of Nicaea., Figure it out pretty quick