“Riding a wave of public anger over the nationwide measles outbreak, vaccine supporters are calling on state lawmakers to tighten or eliminate an exemption to Minnesota’s vaccination rules,” writes MPR News health reporter Lorna Benson.

Minnesota is one of 20 states that allow parents to opt out of vaccinations for their children, if they object to vaccines based on personal beliefs. Parents can do so by providing a notarized statement to their child’s school in which they say the state’s vaccination requirements are contrary to their “conscien­tiously held beliefs.” Vaccine advocates say the philosophical exemption is overused and has made Minnesotans needlessly vulnerable to measles. A bill in the Legislature this session authored by state Rep. Mike Freiberg, DFL-Golden Valley, would require parents to consult with a medical professional before they could claim that exemption.

Related Questions

Yes, given there are no major religions objecting to vaccines, and the personal objection is trumped by a societal need to protect the majority, the exemptions ought to be eliminated.

Mike P

Can you explain how you came to this conclusion? The societal need? What unbiased study(s) out there proves efficacy? On the contrary there is a credible study from 2013 on the pertussis vaccine that proves the opposite. Far too many injuries at 1 in 6 for us to force gov’t will for a benefit that has never been proven to exist. If you’re going to point out the CDC’s mantra of the decline – think again. If you look at charts of the decline in these diseases, it was at and almost 90% decline prior to vaccines. When we decide to force people into medical procedures against their will is the day the doors open to more tyranny and oppression. When will we as a society stop nurturing big pharma’s financial agenda and start relying on eating right, exercising, instead of the antibiotics taking, pill popping and vaccines shooting society. No wonder most immune systems fail. The live on the crutch of pharma. Its out of hand!!

KTN

“Can you explain how you came to this conclusion?”
Sure, by using rational thought.
I was going to cite the CDC, but I guess those researchers have met their match with you, so I will decline.
I like your use of tyranny and oppression too, makes it all so much scarier. The gumbint gonna come and inject poison into all of us in a nefarious attempt to keep us healthy – facists.

Mike P

“The gumbint gonna come and inject poison into all of us in a nefarious attempt to keep us healthy – facists” – yes, this.

Rational thought? Then for goodness sake, please stop making arguments for anything at this point. There isn’t any science that proves efficacy in vaccines. There is one recently that shows us otherwise, though.

Your thought process is typical of why this country is headed where it is going. Have you done ANY objective research on this matter or have you fully taken the CDC and the pharmaceutical companies mantra of herd immunity into your heart and soul. IF and this is a big IF we weren’t seeing so many ‘casualties or war’ with our children and vaccines, perhaps the need to mandate wouldn’t exist and people would volunteer to be vaccinated. Mandating something with SO many problems, injuries and false junk science behind it is fascist at worst.

JJB

No they shouldn’t. It is not government’s place to tell a parent what to do with their child. I vax my kids but I’m not going to tell someone else they have to

Gordon near Two Harbors

No one has the right to threaten the health of others by not vaccinating their kids.

SMP

Yes, in this country actually they do. There are inherent risks to just being alive, you will never eliminate all of those risks, and you certainly don’t have the right to force other people to do things that you think will lower those risks.

Siobhan in Saint Paul

We do have the right to force other people to do things to lower risks to the public, if they want to participate in certain activities. Drivers licenses, seat belts, car seats, building codes, safety regulations, speed limits, medical and other professional licenses, hand gun restrictions, waste disposal requirements, air pollution control equipment, hazardous substance use restrictions, pesticide restrictions, labeling requirements, the LIST goes ON and ON.

Pup

So… a parent has a right to abuse their child? Government shouldn’t get involved? Think about what you’re saying. We live in a society with laws.

Mike P

Not vaccinating my child is not the same as beating my child. Think about what you’re saying.

Pup

OK, you misunderstand. You said that it’s not government place to tell a parent what to do with their child. They already tell you that you can’t beat your child. Do you wish to have a religious exemption from that as well? Your point is terrifically naive. We already have all sorts of laws against what a parent can and can’t do. Deal with it.

Mike P

I didn’t misunderstand anything. What part of not vaccinating my child comes even remotely close to your ill-minded analogy to beating my own kid. Of course the government is going to step in on a beating and religion shouldn’t be used as an excuse to beat them. You are equating someone who decides not to vaccinate from their own due diligent research or religious belief against putting needles and chemicals into their body and the gov’t stepping in on the beating of a child. Not the same damn thing. It doesn’t work. Try again.

Pup

(Sigh…) Dude, what sort of libertarian fantasy are you living? You sound like a 15 year old who just finished reading “Atlas Shrugged.” First, our bodies are just bags of chemicals. And if you’re so concerned that all of us are being duped into poisoning ourselves, then I would just ask that you also sign something saying you won’t take any of our other evil “chemicals” (antivirals, etc.) in the event that you get measles, etc. Instead, you can go on over to your naturopath and get a massage and some herb tea. Also, please move yourselve and your wives and children out to a compound in the mountains — stay away from us with your contagion. This is the price of living in a civilized, modern society. Yes, a terrible needle. Don’t expect to live off the kindness of others forever…

Mike P

…and for the record, I didn’t make the initial post you replied to. So I said NOTHING of the sort. I just came across your ridiculous argument and had to call you out.

GMB

Yes, being stupid is not a right. I have not heard a single credible argument against vaccinating yet. It’s all superstition and stupidity.

SMP

Actually, being “stupid” is a right in this country. Telling other people what to put into their bodies is not the job of government or busy bodies such as yourself.

Al March

Yes. If parents want kids to participate in government-subsidized education and other programming, then the government has a right to hold parents to a higher standard when it comes to immunizations.

Rich in Duluth

Yes. Vaccinations should be mandatory. Philosophical objections should not defeat good public health policy. It is governments place to protect the public health and vaccinations are a part of that protection.

Mike P

Are vaccinations to protect public health? Says the CDC? Says big pharma? Don’t forget that vaccines are a business and have nothing to do with the good of the health in this country. $30B a year incestuous relationship business with the CDC. Do any of you people know what an immune system is anymore or did you forget between trips from the Xbox to and refrigerator? Natural immunity is superior to vaccines (which btw do not work for life if at all) in many ways. A natural immunity will last a lifetime and we are more resilient than we’re given credit for. Some may die of disease as they do now when vaccinated but we can then develop permanent immunity to these diseases without injuries to our neurological makeup, auto-immune diseases, asthma, allergies and without putting Billions into the pocket of a industry that does NOT have our best interest. How could you trust Pharma’s knowledge on what’s best for humanity when they cried to the gov’t about not making money from lawsuits against them and were given immunity (no pun intended) to any and ALL liability from vaccines injury suits. Really folks?

Rich in Duluth

I’m thinking that if “natural immunity is superior to vaccines”, then we wouldn’t have seen a decrease in deaths and illness from flu, polio, small pox, measles, mumps, rubella, etc. since vaccines have come into common usage. Yes, “big pharma” has lots of power and influence in Congress, but we have a capitalist society and people are so opposed to paying taxes to have better government.

Mike P

We did see a decrease Rich, that is not disputed, however, the 90% decrease happened prior to vaccines entering the picture. Studies show the lack of efficacy in vaccines but big media won’t report on it due to the fact big pharma pays millions to advertise their products. You see the CDC and pharma use false fear in order to get the public to RUN out and vaccinate. I would really encourage you to do some due diligence researching for yourself and see what is going on. Most people are only repeating what they are hearing from big pharma and the CDC which have yet to produce an actual unbiased study. Its a money game Rich and we are the cattle.

Rich in Duluth

Mike

These sites don’t seem to back up your contention that “90% of the decrease” happened before vaccines. . The effectiveness of the measles and mumps vaccines seems most dramatic.

In fact, when I was a kid in the 1950s, many of my friends got the measles or the mumps. I did. My kids, however, were vaccinated against these and never got them and we didn’t know of other kids who got these childhood diseases, either.

Mike P

Sorry Rich,

You wont find this chart on the CDC or many gov’t agencies sites since a conflict of interest may occur by admitting they had little if any impact of these diseases. Here is a basic chart showing the corresponding data with CDC, however the inserted timeline of the vaccines lincesures were inserted accurately to represent when they came into the picture of which are omitted in the CDC charts. All info is accurate. One thing I would like to point out is the measles decline specifically prior to the vaccine. There are some other vaccines implemented earlier that hit during the middle of the decline but can still hardly be attributed to the overall vaccination rate that they were designed for.

Interesting enough, we were at a 60-65% vaccination rate for around 40 years without even knowing it and still saw declining diseases.

I know most of us, if not all want to be healthy and disease free – including anti-vaxxers. I as well as most of us aren’t advocating for people to stop vaccinating themselves or their children. That is a decision based wholly on the person who has informed themselves with all the facts as deep as they may seem to be to make that choice. We are advocating for the choice and are trying to show people that our choice not to vaccinate does not affect their children. And if someone is so adamant that vaccines work to the point they are forcing my child to be too, well isn’t that also saying that somewhere they believe the vaccines do not work? Its very contradictory and furthers justifies my reason of choice not to vaccinate.

Mike P

Hopefully this shows individuals that we have been mislead to believe vaccines improved our mortality rates and that an unvaccinated child is not going to hurt the ‘herd’ as we were already well on our way to becoming more resilient every decade.

Rich in Duluth

Mike

I simply don’t trust your “healthsentinel” source. I don’t know what their agenda is or if the data is presented accurately.

The CDC’s mission is to protect the health of the citizens of this country. The taxpayers, who provide the funding, put the CDC in place to do that job. It has no incentive to give erroneous data to the people who pay for their work. In addition, I have a doctor, my hired healthcare expert, who accepts the science behind vaccines, because he has the experience and background to understand it. I go to him for healthcare advice, not websites on the internet or books with unknown agendas.

Mike P

I completely understand your reluctance. I’m not trying to persuade you to stop vaccinating. The chart I provided was prepared using the same stats of the decline in disease that the CDC has, then inserted where the actual vaccines came into play using factual data on those timelines. You would be able to produce the same factual data – nothing is skewed. Its hard for me to put any trust in the CDC – they have a very poor track record due to their history of having pharmaceutical heads sitting on their boards. That’s a HUGE conflict of interest and further points to the ongoing corruption. If you are interested in looking into the ‘web’ there are very credible studies and data that contradicts the CDC. Yes, they were put in place for the overall good of the country early on and
there are decent people working for them that do have our best interest
in mind but unfortunately, like the FDA, persons in control there have
developed some relationships that do not look out for us but rather the
dollar. Yes, there’s crap on the internet but there are also very educated scientist and Dr.s that have dared to shed the truth knowing they were going against the grain. A noteworthy individual recently the CDC whistle blower Dr. William W Thompson PhD. senior scientist. Things aren’t always what they seem and its up to us to gather the facts and not what were ‘told’ and make a determination of choice. That’s the bottom line, Rich.

God speed Rich. Stay healthy.

Rich in Duluth

Mike

I’m not “reluctant” to accept your data; I reject it due to its lack of acceptance in the general medical community. Vaccines are not flawless and a reasonable person would not expect them to be. But, they have obviously contributed to a significant decline in disease. As the recent Ebola outbreak showed, societies without a good medical infrastructure do worse than those with good medical service. Sure, some people will be injured by vaccines, but if the overall result is a reduction in disease and society, as a whole, is healthier, then it is worth it to society to vaccinate its population. It’s that simple.

Sure, there are always going to be individuals who will try to profit from misinformation by selling snake oil. But, that does not call into question the basic science around this issue. You say that “natural immunity is superior to vaccines”, you call into question “herd” immunity, you evaluate a graph from an unknown source and say it shows some trend, to name a few of your assertions. Where is the solid, peer reviewed science to back up these assertions?

BTW, snopes addresses the William Thompson issue here .

I’m sure none of this will shake your strongly held beliefs about this issue. I wish you well.

Mike P

Hi Rich,

I read that on snopes as well. I agree with you regarding medical breakthroughs and the importance of it. I firmly believe the medical community has helped us live healthier and longer lives but I also believe the lifestyle changes we’ve made in terms of sanitation, hygiene, food and water quality can more so be the reason of our better health and elimination of disease. Unfortunately, Doctors do not know much about vaccines other than what they are told and how to administer them. There is too much influence from big pharma in the medical field, the regulatory agencies, politics and mainstream media.

That graph is only a tiny tiny piece of it Rich. I did not just only look at a graph to form my belief – as that would be very irresponsible of me. Its the same statistical data that can be found everywhere and though there isn’t a CDC header on it, doesn’t make it invalid. But I understand how difficult it is to steer away from information that has been pounded and engrained in us for an idea that it is inaccurate.

For the record, I was on your side of the fence my entire life. After my wife saw her child develop a neurological disorder, I decided to research for myself to find out both sides of the issue and this is where it lead me. Tough to be on the majority side but when it all clicked, everything made sense to me and this is the decision I went with because I truly believe it is right based on all the pieces in the picture, however scattered and masked they were. Its out there Rich if you want to seek it.

Beth-Ann Bloom

Yes for the common good

Jim G

Yes. When I became a teacher in the early seventies I was required by Minnesota State Law to be tested for tuberculous. if I had tested positive for TB, I would have lost my teaching license and job. As an TB carrier it would have been and still is a prudent policy to protect school children from this infectious disease by limiting my rights and the rights all of school staff. Parents rightly demand that any staff member with TB cannot be in close proximity to children. I see no difference to requiring vaccinations for measles, mumps, rubella, whooping cough, and other infectious diseases which threaten the public’s health.

SMP

An employer having certain requirements of their employees and the government forcing something on private citizens are two separate issues.

Wayne Rohde

No. Many of us deal with vaccine injury of a family member, who are immune compromised.

Gordon near Two Harbors

Vaccine injury is extremely rare. Imagine how many people would be injured–or die–from the diseases that vaccines prevent. Check out the obituaries in newspapers from the 1930s and 40s.

Wayne Rohde

No doubt there were casualties from disease. The point is that vaccine injury is rare, not extremely rare. And we are not anti-vaxers. There are casualties from vaccines as well. So we need to allow those who cannot be vax, those who see legitimate reasons not to vax, and those who want to vax. It is the individual and parent choice, not gov’t nor Pharma to tell us.

Mike P

It was rarer then Gordon because there weren’t 67 shots given to children by the time they’re 6. Vaccines began really around 1931 and first cases of neurological damage showed up in children shortly after. Its not just immediate injury we’re talking about here either. Look at the rise in Alzheimer’s and dementia from those born right around that time. Look at the ever increasing shots in our schedules and the rise of injury. That is just one piece of many many more to look at in this debate

Greg Groebner

If vaccines are actually effective, why worry about you and yours when others are not vaccinated?

Jim G

Vaccinations vary in their effectiveness. Even if they are 95% effective that still leaves 5 out of 100 unprotected. So we rely on “Herd” immunity to protect those fighting cancer, frail elders, infants, and those with immune deficiences. It’s a basic concept taught in Public Health 101.

davehoug

How about those without vaccines (for medical or personal reasons) be home-schooled when a known case of measles is found in the school? Return when the danger is over.

A balance between rights of self and public???

PaulJ

They could tighten up the rules. Maybe by saying; if you don’t get vaccinated, stay out of tax payer funded buildings.

Jon Bohlinger

We mandate vaccines because as a society we know that they are safe and effective. If you want to put society at risk because you hold erroneous beliefs about the vaccines, then society is not obligated to enable you.

tl;dr Yes. We’re trying to have a society here.

Mike P

What unbiased study have you read that proves safety and efficacy of vaccines? News flash. Society in the US since late 1800’s has improved its hygiene, drinking water, general medical knowledge and overall living conditions. The CDC has been falsely attributing decline in disease with vaccines for years. When you do your own homework, actual CDC charts and history of vaccines will show you the decline was 90% before they were introduced. So the fact that ‘they work’ is a misnomer. Look up an actual scientific study regarding pertussis in 2013. It shatters the herd immunity theory. And if you dig even more, you will find that this country was only at a 65% vaccinations rate for close to 50 years. But as the minions of our country, you will believe skewed information as God’s word and then we all end up suffering. So who’s really putting who at risk here?

Jon Bohlinger

People who don’t vaccinate. Because they are safe and effective as demonstrated by hundreds of studies across the globe that control for all the things that you mentioned.

Mike P

I appreciate that as a society we want to be immune to diseases and I agree no one wants to suffer, however, it is not a fact they are safe and effective. Those studies you are referring to are produced in a conflict of interest among the pharmaceutical companies own ‘scientists’. Would you ‘produce’ a study that showed no benefit of vaccines and nullify your ability to pocket billions of dollars? This is the same industry that almost went bankrupt in the 80’s because of injury lawsuits and they convinced the gov’t to give them immunity on any liability for injuries due to vaccines. They are dangerous Jon. Many infants and children are being injured without ability to be compensated though the gov’t has set up a federally funded VEARS program to compensate injured families, however, only 10% of injuries are even reported and only 20% of those who make claims even get compensated. So we and the gov’t know injuries occur. I’m all for combating disease but not at the expense of incurring a very wide spectrum of neurological damage, physical injury and or death of my infant. Perhaps changing the schedule because currently we are vaccinating children at 2 hours old with a dangerous neuro-damaging HepB vax and then 67 others be the time a child is 6 years of age. HepB? What day old infant do you know of that shoots smack and has sex to be considered high risk for HepB other than the mother having it. This is too much for an infant that doesn’t have the ability to rid themselves of toxic chemicals – hence leading to injury. These are developing children and that idea is ludicrous. When I was vaxxed Jon, I had 8. The amount of injuries parallel the increase in the vax schedule. I’m all for fighting disease and its up to us to question the current situation and find another alternative such as natural immunity.

Jon Bohlinger

…just nope. Not worth it.

Mike P

…but you’re willing to tell me I have to stick toxins in my arm and my child’s arm regardless of my well informed decision for the good of you or your children because big pharma told you its for the benefit of society. SMH

Yanotha Twangai

As much as possible, yes. As a young adult I was tested for measles immunity and discovered to my horror that my childhood vaccinations, which were complete, did not take (so I was revaccinated and am now immune). I had been unknowngly susceptible to measles all those years. Had it not been for the “herd immunity” provided by everyone else being vaccinated, I might well have contracted the disease, perhaps even after puberty, when it is especially dangerous. When parents refuse to have their kids vaccinated, they’re not only putting their own children at risk but others as well.

Mike P

Herd immunity does not exist with the vaccination model. Case in point. True immunity is through the body’s natural exposure. And immune for life. No ‘booster’ to get (which proves non efficacy in vaccines) also this country was at a true vaccination rate of around 65% when is was determined that the baby boomers all vaccinated it only lasted for two years. This was determined 50 years later when boosters were required. This is also an admission of gov’y agencies. So roughly 50% of the population were walking around without a effective vaccine. All the while disease declining. WAKE UP people. Use your brains.

Zeit Geist

When are we going to finally WAKE UP and realize that we are so easily controlled and manipulated by fear mongering and manufactured hysteria year after year. The history of vaccines is not a magical fairy tale about a vaccine riding in on a white horse curing all illness and everybody lived happily ever after. That is so far from the truth – read your history so we don’t continue repeating the destructive parts of it. As Einstein poignantly stated, “The world is a dangerous place to live. Not because of the people who are evil; but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.” The sad truth is most of us do more research when we buy a new TV but blindly follow vaccine guidelines and don’t research what is being injected into our bodies and our children’s’ bodies. That is the power of indoctrination and desperately wanting to believe in something. Vaccines give us a false sense of security. We want the easy way out – a shot will keep me healthy so I don’t have to take any responsibility for my own health and change my own behavior. Maybe it’s time to delve into information beyond what is provided by the CDC. I challenge people to LOOK into the financial conflicts of interest between the CDC, pharmaceutical companies, AAP and politicians among others. There are billions of
dollars at stake with the vaccine issue. LOOK into the pending whistleblower cases regarding vaccines most notably from senior CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson. LOOK into the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Court”). Most Americans know nothing about it and the millions of dollars that have been quietly awarded to individuals injured or killed by vaccines (including brain injuries with autistic spectrum). LOOK at how quickly we blame, vilify and silence those who question the safety, efficacy and need for vaccines and validate only those people who support vaccines. Why are the thousands of physician, scientists and citizens who have valid concerns labeled “quacks” and a physician like Paul Offit labeled “vaccine expert”? LOOK at the safety track record and history of fraud of pharmaceutical companies and the CDC. LOOK at the vaccines and medications that have been taken off the market due to serious adverse events then decide if the public’s concerns about current vaccines are really absurd and unwarranted. LOOK at the sheer volume or pharmaceutical advertising then ask yourself if the dependence on these advertising dollars influence the reporting of health issues by the media. Why do we only equate the road to health being paved by the use
of pharmaceuticals and vaccines. We have dismissed the direct correlation of
the decline of disease throughout history by advances in nutrition, sanitation,
clean water, and better working and living conditions. Why isn’t that something
to celebrate? I suppose because those reasons can’t be patented and sold. As
Hippocrates stated, “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food”. But,
what did he know? We have become a victim of our own fear and hubris which slowly erode our human rights. START CONNECTING THE DOTS.

Mike P

Well said, Zeit Geist.

kathienoga

I am a chemically sensitive person who can not tolerate the toxic products such as mercury and formaldehyde which are found in vaccines, so I am glad there is an exemption for people in my situation. Medicine should not have these toxic ingredients in there in the first place, but unfortunately they do. I would also recommend contacting Jerri Johnson of the Natural Health Coalition who can give you an intelligent discussion on an alternative view point which I did not hear on your station. As a public station you are required to present alternative view points. There are children who have been injured from these vaccines.

Raymo

The fact that some children have a reaction to different vaccines should not matter. If you know for certain there is a health risk you have every right to refuse. But I do not think there should be blanket exemption. I will use myself as an example. I had a
major health event in 1995; I was given a drug to help relax me so I could be intubated.
The drug had the exact opposite effect, I do not believe that drug shouldn’t be used
for the general public because I had a bad reaction. I feel the same way about vaccines
they work and are safe for the 95+ %. While we have individual rights , we also have
societal responsibilities

Ellen

I would suggest that you get the ingredient inserts and warnings from several vaccines and see what is in them. Then decide whether or not you want to inject that into your baby. I, for one, do not believe that the hepatitis vaccine is needed by any newborn. I would suggest that you do some parental research before succumbing to medical protocol. Of further concern is the number of vaccines now required, along with the number of boosters. Our children are getting “hit” from many sources–from the pesticides, herbicides, hormones, and antibiotics in our food supply, to the chemicals in cleaning and personal care products, to flame retardants, to chemicals including pharmaceuticals and other toxins in our water supplies, to toxins in the very air that we breathe. We are a society that has allowed big corporations to totally control us. I believe in a parent’s right to request exemption from all or certain vaccines–as part of personal responsibility in raising a healthy child.

davehoug

Very valid points. Now tell me if that decision comes with responsibility to others. Would you be OK with un-vaxed kids kept out of school and required to be home-schooled by the parent for the weeks that an outbreak is going on at your child’s school?

davehoug

I think it is wise to vaccinate. You may feel it is wise to NOT vaccinate. This is a free country. But what consequences / responsibilities does that non-vax decision bring? Forbidden to play Santa Claus, be around kids as teacher, janitor, bus-driver, work at restaurants? Home-school your child at your expense during outbreaks? Does a pediatrician have the legal right to say I forbid non-vaxed kids from my waiting room?

davehoug

Up to now, there have been no consequences, obligations, responsibilities on those who refuse vaccinations. That may be changing. Show your status to go to Disneyland, a cruise, a mall????

davehoug

If the outbreaks die off with no severe stories or poster-child the issue will fade. Should there be a tragic case the issue will not fade.

Rick

Be fined and billed for cost of containing the outbreak if you or your children are not vaccinated and found to have been involved in an outbreak

Pup

Yes. If persons wish to be part of our society and reap the benefits of modern medicine, they have an obligation to get vaccinated — despite the small risks. If they don’t vaccinate and become gravely ill, do we have “the freedom” to turn them away from a hospital? No. They can’t have it both ways. “Religious exemptions” for this aren’t the same as for something like military service and it opens the door to abuse.

Mike P

I keep hearing the the mantra argument for herd immunity and let me tell
you, there is no such thing as herd immunity. The so-called herd
immunity from vaccination is not what has brought disease to a decline.
Its a complete sham. Of course we ALL want to avoid disease many people have fallen victim to one of the biggest
ponzi schemes ever to exist. Fear mongered by a financial powerhouse
into running to the nearest Dr. to get your kids 67 lovely pokes of
Aluminum, Thimerosal (organomercury), Formaldehyde, GMOs, hormones from
infected cows, pigs, chickens and monkeys, untested
virus combinations (like H1N1), emulsifiers, and
crossbred bacteria from animals, mosquitoes, and aborted human fetuses
all by the time the child is 6 years old! No wonder 1 in 6 end up with
some sort of neurological injury. Count me out, yell at me in disgust
because I don’t want to be party to this genocide but DO NOT FORCE ME to vaccinate my children
against my will on this medical procedure. Vaccines are NOT proven to
work. Disease declined before they were introduced and efficacy is nill.
Check out this study on pertussis.

-Studies
like this that the media failed to cover exist but they will hurt the
pocketbook of poor big pharma who actually runs the medical field now
and who got is ‘immune’ from lawsuits from victims of injury.Its time to take back our freedom of choice and stop believing and relying on false data from studies conducted and paid for by the companies who stand to make the most profit from it. Wake up! Fear has worked for thousands of years to keep masses in check. Its even admitted by the CDC themselves that they use fear tactics. Search it out. Its there…