Sunday, February 22, 2009

There aren't a lot of defined minority groups that have managed to maintain their existence for millennia. In the West, I can think of but two, the Jews and the Roma (along with a few Christian sects like the Amish). Of course, there are still pockets of such people around, particularly in the Middle East, and a long history of such groups that no longer exist, either through assimilation or violence. The Catholic Church has been particularly careful to eliminate its rivals over the centuries (which is why there isn't an Albigensian Lobby!).

It is tough to keep a defined minority together. Other than the violence (which requires an investigation of the methods used by the group to establish relations with the outside, the subject of another posting, which will lead to a consideration of the relative success of the Jews and the Roma), the main problem is preventing voluntary assimilation. Being different is uncomfortable. Everybody wants to belong to the larger society. The different rules of the larger society look like freedom to younger people. How do you prevent assimilation?

The main method used by all minority groups to prevent assimilation is a mythology of the vast superiority of the group over the outsiders. This is drilled into children from the youngest age (I should note that this brainwashing is the main reason why almost all Jews are hopelessly confused on issues of the Middle East, and why the Jews won't be able to solve the problem they have created). People gain a considerable amount of their self-worth from their perceived superiority as members of the group. Preservation of the superior group is the highest value, and damaging the group is the greatest sin.

Of course, 'marrying out' is a terrible wrong. In a group where belonging is defined through the mother, 'marrying out' for a man is the greatest possible sin. Not only is it a sin in itself as it damages the group, but it dooms the children to a half-life as animals who can never regain their lost superiority. The conversion required of outsiders who 'marry in', and the controversy which still surrounds such conversions, is evidence of the importance of the perception of race purity in group identity.

It is not a coincidence that the Jewish Billionaires are all middle aged men, many of them who have themselves committed the ultimate sin or who have seen it among their colleagues. They are obsessed with assimilation. Contrary to what you might think, they are not obsessed with the physical survival of Jewish people; they are obsessed with the racial purity of the group. Since the Jews have no real defined racial characteristics - most Jews are racially identical to the Palestinians, and almost all of the Jewish Billionaires are descended from relatively late converts who have never had any connection with the Middle East - this is largely bullshit, but bullshit that is the subject of rather fervent belief.

We can only understand the mystery of the Israeli Empire - Greater Israel - if we grasp the central importance of this fear of assimilation. Obviously, the manipulation of the United States to fight Wars For The Jews, and the manipulation of Middle East politics to create a series of wars around and involving Israel, is very risky to the existence of individual Jews. The Jewish Billionaires don't care about that. Israel, or Greater Israel, is Anti-Assimilation-Land. Since everybody around you is a Jew, and, as planned, no Jews will be elsewhere, there is no risk of 'marrying out'. The guiding perception is that the key threat to the Jewish people isn't a holocaust, it is the gradual drifting away of members of the group. The Jewish Billionaires are willing to take any risk and commit any atrocity - start wars, kill and displace millions of people, end human civilization, destroy human rights and free speech around the world, destroy international law. and lay low the greatest economies, all to avoid the risk of the greatest threat to the Jewish group, assimilation.

Of course, the paradox is that the more evil the Jewish Billionaires act, the more that decent and moral Jews are voting with their feet and voluntarily leaving the group, fed up with all the violence and lies and manipulation. This drives those who remain even crazier, and makes them take even greater risks.

The ultimate goal of the Jewish Billionaires is to make Israel 'racially' pure, and have all the Jews of the world living in Israel. This explains the odd behavior of Israel. Why is Israel always obsessed with its short borders, and how difficult such borders are to defend? Surely short borders are easier to defend than the borders of a country stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates. The reason that Israel has never set its borders is that the calculations are that the Jews, after all moving to the Middle East and being fruitful and multiplying, will need all the land of Greater Israel in order to be able to survive.

Self-worth is defined by group identity, but the group is threatened by assimilation. The only way to stop assimilation is to move all the Jews to one place, Anti-Assimilation-Land, and that place is Greater Israel. That is the explanation for the irrational behavior of the Jewish Billionaires, and the irrational out-of-control violence of the Jewish State.

41
comments:

One such strange belief is that G_D has promised them the area of land from the Nile to the Euphrates.

However, this belief is entirely mistaken. In Genesis 15:18

"In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, "Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates."

G_D promises (unspecified) descendants of Abraham the land from the Nile to the Euphrates, however, in Genesis 17:8,

"And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God."

and in Exodus 6:3-4,

"And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them. And I have also established my covenant with them, to give them the land of Canaan, the land of their pilgrimage, wherein they were strangers."

and again in First Chronicles 16:16-18,

"Even of the covenant which he made with Abraham, and of his oath unto Isaac; And hath confirmed the same to Jacob for a law, and to Israel for an everlasting covenant, saying, "Unto thee will I give the land of Canaan, the lot of your inheritance;"

G_D promises only the land of Canaan (the promised land) to the descendants of Abraham's younger son, Isaac (which includes as a small portion, the biblical Jews).

So then, according to the Torah, the Jews (together with the Israelites) have only been promised the land Canaan.

And that is all they get, for in Joshua 21:43 & 45

"And the LORD gave unto Israel ALL THE LAND which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein..... There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass."

G_D says that the Israelites and Jews have already possessed all the land promised to them.

That's it, no more land for the Jews.

A similar statement is made in Nehemiah 9:23-4

"Their children also multipliedst thou as the stars of heaven, and broughtest them into the land, concerning which thou hadst promised to their fathers, that they should go in to possess it. So the children went in and possessed the land, and thou subduedst before them the inhabitants of the land, the Canaanites, and gavest them into their hands,..."

So, since it is not the Jews/Israelites that got the land from the Nile to the Euphrates, which descendants of Abraham did get it?

Well, by observation, it is clear that the Arabs, the descendants of Abraham's eldest son, Ishmael, got it.

So, the Arabs are the people of the promise. The promise of land from the Nile to the Euphrates.

That is, the Arabs were promised the area of land from the Nile to the Euphrates, and G_D gave it to them.

So, Jews are disobeying G_D when they try to force the Arabs from their G_D given home.

Will Netanyahu kill the US/Israel romance? "Moreover, Netanyahu will in all likelihood swiftly return to his old habit of alienating Israel's friends. Even Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak once admitted the Israeli nationalist leader made him "very, very, very exasperated." Jordan's King Hussein, who at one point ceased all contact with the former premier, openly accused him of betrayal and trying "to destroy all that I have worked to build between our peoples."

And who can forget how the Americans talked about him after his last stint as premier? Former White House staffer Aaron David Miller described in his book how President Bill Clinton reacted to Netanyahu's habit of lecturing foreign leaders: "Who the f*** does he think he is? Who's the f***ing superpower here?" Former White House spokesman Joe Lockhart described him as "one of the most obnoxious individuals you're going to come into - just a liar and a cheat." Surely President Barack Obama will have even less patience for Netanyahu's attempts to obstruct a peace settlement." Daily Star

"Like a lot of extreme nationalists in various parts of the world, Netanyahu deeply believes in the intellectual and moral superiority of what he thinks of as his people. For him, innate feelings of group superiority are the bedrock of his personality. The Oval Office encounter which I forecast some time ago is inevitably in the cards now. Ah, to be a fly on the wall in that one."

You claimed that 6,000,000 Jews were "killed" by the Nazis, BUT you never commented on the major discrepancy mentioned in previous comments.

You refuse to admit that Elie Wiesel is simply a Jew LIAR and HATE monger.

A HATE monger, who says,in chapter 12, of Legends of Our Time:

"Every German, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate -- healthy, virile hate -- for what the Jew personifies and for what persists in the Jew. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of the dead."

Or, something like that.

Here are a few articles regarding the HolyCo$t hoax, that may help explain what happened:

Off the cuff, I would have thought the Finns and the Basque could be identified as groups isolated in the sense you suggest, neither of which preach genetic superiority. But let us pass that by as an attack of fatigue.

Puerile beyond measure is the racial characterization of the Jews' isolation over millenia. For starters the Khazar conversion ca. 1,000 years ago has so much evidence that talk of Jewish separation over millenia demands justification and evidence. Next, and for this you need only refer to Martillo, you indulge yourself in witless anachronism when you tacitly suggest that the Judaism of two thousand years ago has anything to do with the Western Jewish sects of today, and pass by the period of conversions.Most ridiculous of all is your notion of Israel as a place protected from assimilation. To my certain knowledge most Jews could not give a flying fuck about assimilation. (Consider the numbers of Russian "Jews"). Large numbers however are very concerned about money, and the advantage that is got by belonging to the tribe. Israel is a money hole, and a money hole of so great an extent that it is translated to pure power which freely orders the actions of the US and Britain.

Your "racial purity" can only mean racial purity of Polish Jewry, i.e. the Khazar descendents. There is no sane way that it can apply to any of the Jewish Arabs, nor yet to any of the young Jewish people I know (one exception -- a really sick young puppy).

How dare you puff yourself up so and lay down the law?

I apologize to all for my incoherence, I am enraged to a point where I cannot think or write consequently.

PS And no, for anyone who has the least interest in investigation there was no holocaust. As a group the Jews are a misery to mankind. As individuals they are as any other.

The real tragedy is that WALTZ WITH BASHIR lost the best foreign Oscar to Japan. I loved WALTZ and haven't been that moved by a film since SCHINDLERS LIST, where the ending featuring hundreds of Jewish folk escaping Germany so the young among them could join the IDF and start slaughtering thousands of innocent Palestinians had me in tears.

The only way to stop assimilation is to move all the Jews to one place, Anti-Assimilation-Land

Wouldn't that encourage inbreeding?

But I guess that's already Israel state policy, as an Israeli can only marry another Jew in the promised land.

Now the justice minister has come along and, together with the chief rabbi, has decided to establish a new, separate group of gentiles, who are allowed to marry one another as long as they don't marry a Jewish man or woman, God forbid. That is the salvation they are being offered.

That is how the purity of Judaism, which is preserved under the watchful eye of the religious establishment and the justice minister, is preventing some of the citizens of this country and their children from assimilating among the citizens of the state who have Jewish mothers. It's true that they'll attend the same educational institutions, will study Hebrew and Bible and history - but they will not be allowed to marry "kosher" Jews, because we are the Chosen People, holy seed.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=887462

Just what the world needs, more inbred, violent out of control psychos with their collective hands on the nuclear trigger.

Here in America, they're called "Necons" and hang out at Zionist think tanks, dreaming up more ways to get America fighting more wars for Israel.

In the promised land, they're called "Zionists" and are hell bent on dictating to the world their vision of a "Jew World Order."

The real history of the Jews: the cause of their survival as an ethnic and religious minority is their specialized economic role, as international traders and bankers. They are not the direct descendants of the Jews of classical antiquity.

Those Pakistani women; First Hilary is dating one, and George Clooney rumoured to be dating 26 year old journalist Fatima Bhutto, niece of Benazir, who famously accused aunty of murdering her daddy:http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-who-is-fatima-bhutto-anyway/ http://www.buzzfeed.com/akdobbins/fatima-bhutto/fatima_on_the_bhutto_family_feud

Dr. Faurisson http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v05/v05p289_Faurisson.htmlquestions Irving's um, knowledge of A Certain Historical Eventand elsewhere http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/Irving/Irving-IrvingIsJewish-GermarRudolf.html adds that Irving's mother was Jewish (Irving denies, but my research into the Dolman family indicated something going back 2 centuries-so what)Still, much as I appreciate Irving's skills at finding original historical documents, and his WWII knowledge is second to none (except on Holocaustianity)he's become a bit of a distraction.

A couple of beers later, and much more concerned with being pleasant to my lady love than Xymphora's rubbish. With luck she will keep me under the feathers for the next week.

I am prepared to assert and argue that 95% of the holocaust stories are lunatic nonsense, with the last 5% being well deserved retribution. I grew up with Jews and I have seen how the non-stop indoctrination works. Use your commonsense about the supposed murder of millions. How could you wipe out half the population of London and not leave a trace?

Irving is a very good, and more importantly a reliable, writer. He is, if anything, too much reserved in his criticism of Churchill. His presentation of Hitler appears to be spot on. For the rest I am unsure, but I buy his books because they are well-written and should be supported.

If you wish I can give you a short list of texts that have opened my mind; if you give me a disposable e-mail I can send pdfs.

Essentially, our "anonymous" is correct, only a bit hysterical and mono-maniacal.

APSunday, February 22nd 2009http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2009/02/22/2009-02-22_israeli_prime_minister_ehud_olmert_apolo.htmlBroadcast recently on a late-night show on the private Channel 10 TV station, the segment mocked the belief that Mary was a virgin and that Jesus walked on water.

The skit was a sarcastic response to the Vatican's rehabilitation of a Catholic bishop who denied the Holocaust took place. The host later apologized for causing offense.

The Vatican issued a statement Friday calling the segment a "vulgar and offensive act of intolerance."

Xympho your famous "Jewish billionaires", have been acting rationally to gain domination of markets, and industries,through wars- only now in recession it appears irrational.Like the example with Vatican shows, the H.-cause is presented like a medieval dogma of the church, but really used to protect modern industries of finance, and Hollywood & media, that exploit the work of nations, waste the dreams of younger generations and undermine social relations in all Western countries. Disproportional, Jews make careers there, but not all. But these relations are protected against investigation by accusing anti-semitism (but not against Arabs) and denial of the mentioned myth, that embarrassingly is lacking evidence like necessary in criminal investigation.SFrtz

This idea could turn me into a pro-israeli (let palestinians occupy vacated mansions and condo units in manhattan, monaco, geneva, london ... there will be no crowding)

Never (tongue in cheek or no tongue in cheek). Palestine is the homeland of the Palestinian people, no one else. No "exchange of populations", which is Zionist public relations meaning mass theft and genocide.

I think the Mormons need closer attention. They have a lot of power in certain parts of the US system. For instance, they are quite a powerful force in the FBI. I often wibder, just as a thought experiment, what would happen if they tried to secede from the USA?

Now now lobro,yarmuklestan ;) is West of there, Bathust Lawrence going up to Thornhill. Last year, volunteering supervision time with my son's school outing, his teacher was accosted several times on the TTC bus going up Bathurst, "are you Jewish?" and his bristling reply was nope, he's Greek Orthodox.

that's right, MFA, don't i know it, which is why i call my area at the margin.most of the joos in my school were weiss collar and recall, those were 60s, so they were bigtime hippies, you know the score:How does it feelTo be on your ownWith no direction homeLike a complete unknown

except it was all bitter bullshit, they were just slumming, with a corner office waiting at Lehman Brothers.