Neil Reddin

Neil Reddin, a Councillor in the London Borough of Bromley, looks ahead to the election after next.

We no doubt benefited from protest votes last Thursday, only some of
whom may be likely to turn voting Conservative into a habit come the
General Election. Even so there are also those who, as Boris Johnson
identified, had their pencils hovering for a moment before voting for
us. Come 2010, the hoverers could well make the difference between us
winning and losing - or, being optimistic, between a wafer thin or a
stonking majority. It will be the likes of the NUT member who admitted
to voting Conservative, on a radio phone-in show last Friday, who could
make that difference.

The bigger challenge in our first four years in government will be to
crystallise those pencil wavers into habitual Conservative voters. Part
of that process, of winning the 2014 General Election, must begin now.

The best way to sustain the new Conservative revival, in the long term,
is not so much to keep the party closer to the centre of the political
spectrum (though that is invariably where elections are won from), but
to shift that centre point rightwards. We have a window of opportunity
in the next few years, a period when people are no longer shy of
admitting voting Conservative, a period when we have the ear of the
media at last.

Neil is a Chartered Certified Accountant and is also the cabinet member for Resources in the London Borough of Bromley.

Backdating legislation, double crossing small businesses, holding public services hostage – who really has the moral high-ground on tax avoidance?

One of the earliest charges that the Conservatives levelled against the “New” Labour government was that of taxing by stealth – and it has stuck and become embedded in the lexicon of politics. Not bad for a party that had then only recently suffered the biggest electoral defeat for ninety years.

Yet beneath the top of the stealth tax iceberg is a chaotic web of loophole-plugging and amendments that have left the UK’s tax system one of the most complicated in the world. A system where many “simplifying measures” only add to a complexity that even those operating the system – those working for HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) – have difficulty keeping up with.

This leads us to another aspect – it is to do with the volume of tax legislation which serves to tackle anti-avoidance. Of course, so much of any tax statute is aimed at plugging “loopholes”, but there has been a discernable shift in the attitudes behind the measures - from a reluctant acceptance that anti-avoidance is part of the game played between the tax authorities, taxpayers and their agents - to something more insidious.