<quoted text>Read the report Bubba.They were both on the phone all night long.Now were they "covering up something? I believe so. But I don't believe they were covering up what you think they were hiding.But hey..you work in clandestine top secret boat repair...right?woof

Obama and Clinton decided to let Americans in Benghazi die at the hands of Muslims.There's no covering over that fact.

<quoted text>And Bush decided to let Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan die at the hands of Muslims. And Reagan decided to let Americans in Lebanon die at the hands of Muslims.When we put Americans in dangerous places, bad things are going to happen.

<quoted text>No, pinhead, it is exactly the truth. Americans choose to send Americans into very dangerous places to do very dangerous things and sometimes that results in death.

Fatal flaw in your comparisons: Our military were NEVER put into a dangerous zone without full protection, equipment and back-up.

Steven's and others request for more security were DENIED, and when the attack started, Obama skipped out of the WH and Hilary began packing for an extended stay in SA. And immediately started the video lie and cover up. Go play in heavy traffic che you loser

<quoted text>Fatal flaw in your comparisons: Our military were NEVER put into a dangerous zone without full protection, equipment and back-up.Steven's and others request for more security were DENIED, and when the attack started, Obama skipped out of the WH and Hilary began packing for an extended stay in SA. And immediately started the video lie and cover up. Go play in heavy traffic che you loser

Really? You don't remember people raising money to buy soldier's in their families body armor in Iraq? Of course you don't.

You guys need to get your stories straight. Either Obama was watching the events unfold live or he "skipped out of the White House." Both can't be true. Pick one.

"...What are those repeatedly asked, but still unanswered, questions? There are three.One. Why were the diplomatic security forces cut in the weeks and months before the attack, in the face of pleas from Ambassador Stevens to increase them, and who made that decision?

Two. Once things went south, who made the decision to cover up the fact that it was a pre-planned attack by an al-Qaeda affiliate?

But most importantly, why wasn't a rescue initiated? Even Chris Matthews, liberal host of MSNBC's Hardball, and hardly a wild-eyed right winger, recently asked, "Where was the U.S. cavalry, to use an American image? Where were the people that could have come or that tried to get there within however many hours it took to save the lives of the people still living. Where were they and why couldn't they do it? I'm going to ask that question until I get an answer." Matthews alludes to stories that Special Ops troops even boarded airplanes to take them to the fight and then, inexplicitly, their mission was cancelled! Why? And by whom?..."

Damn, those water buckets must be heavy for you two dawgs."...What are those repeatedly asked, but still unanswered, questions? There are three.One. Why were the diplomatic security forces cut in the weeks and months before the attack, in the face of pleas from Ambassador Stevens to increase them, and who made that decision?Two. Once things went south, who made the decision to cover up the fact that it was a pre-planned attack by an al-Qaeda affiliate?But most importantly, why wasn't a rescue initiated? Even Chris Matthews, liberal host of MSNBC's Hardball, and hardly a wild-eyed right winger, recently asked, "Where was the U.S. cavalry, to use an American image? Where were the people that could have come or that tried to get there within however many hours it took to save the lives of the people still living. Where were they and why couldn't they do it? I'm going to ask that question until I get an answer." Matthews alludes to stories that Special Ops troops even boarded airplanes to take them to the fight and then, inexplicitly, their mission was cancelled! Why? And by whom?..."Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/10/r...Follow us:@AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Two out of the three are legitimate questions. Are you willing to even consider answers to them that don't involve some sort of nefarious conspiracy?

<quoted text>Your White House has declared all of the questions to be illegitimate.It's "nefarious conspiracy" in this case, therefore, is to conceal the facts.But...we see that practice daily from this WH.As in...6 first-day Obamacare enrollees.Always hiding their epic failures.

Yeah, I didn't think you were capable. There could be testimony on Capitol Hill in perpetuity and you would claim you were being denied facts.

You lose legitimacy when you take every single event and try to jam it into your agenda.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Add your comments below

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.