Brother_Mouzone:DoBeDoBeDo: I love that it wasn't even an interview, Just them hanging out for the most part.

Saw it live and woke the wife up from laughing so hard, I had tears streaming down.

"It's not ME raping a raccoon, it's me as a panda raping a raccoon."

I actually called mine over to watch it. I never do that. Just because it was so obviously spontaneous. and great.

I rewound it so my husband could watch why I was on the floor laughing so hard. I also loved that Gervais completely lost it at Jon's "two black eyes" comment. Awesome--thought he was going to do a spit-take.

pisceandreamer:Right up there with him talking w/Elmo and necrophilia comes up.

I told my husband, who's not a big Ricky Gervais fan, that he should watch the interview just to see how long it would take Stewart to lose control of it. If a producer couldn't handle Gervais with a freakin' puppet, what was Gervais going to be like with Stewart? Stewart never even had a chance--Gervais leaped right in with his panda story. Great "interview"--I cracked up all the way through.

I hit record so that I could show Mr. DeaH the interview this morning. I thought I might not laugh as hard on the second viewing. Nope. Started losing it again at "giant spunk bomb," and was in pain from laughing so hard by the time the raccoon was flipped around.

Crewmannumber6:Did he mention that he's an athiest? Because he like to mention that he's an athiest.

He doesn't realy mention it much unless Piers Morgan asks him about it. Though, I notice that YouTube makes it look like he exists only in the context of the Atheist debate. Nobody even knew he was an atheist until he had two popular tv series and years of celebritydom under his belt.

brigid_fitch:pisceandreamer: Right up there with him talking w/Elmo and necrophilia comes up.

I told my husband, who's not a big Ricky Gervais fan, that he should watch the interview just to see how long it would take Stewart to lose control of it. If a producer couldn't handle Gervais with a freakin' puppet, what was Gervais going to be like with Stewart? Stewart never even had a chance--Gervais leaped right in with his panda story. Great "interview"--I cracked up all the way through.

To be fair, Stewart interviewing Gervais tends to turn out that way. In general Stewart likes to just shoot the breeze with fellow comedians instead of sticking to a strict interview format.

Thorndyke Barnhard:Crewmannumber6: Did he mention that he's an athiest? Because he like to mention that he's an athiest.

He doesn't realy mention it much unless Piers Morgan asks him about it. Though, I notice that YouTube makes it look like he exists only in the context of the Atheist debate. Nobody even knew he was an atheist until he had two popular tv series and years of celebritydom under his belt.

Not entirely true. Last time he was on TDS he spent the whole segment on it, including unveiling his athiest christmas cards. I wasn't really offended, justnot amused

brigid_fitch:pisceandreamer: Right up there with him talking w/Elmo and necrophilia comes up.

I told my husband, who's not a big Ricky Gervais fan, that he should watch the interview just to see how long it would take Stewart to lose control of it. If a producer couldn't handle Gervais with a freakin' puppet, what was Gervais going to be like with Stewart? Stewart never even had a chance--Gervais leaped right in with his panda story. Great "interview"--I cracked up all the way through.

Stewart didn't lose control of anything. He lets the guest determine whether they want to stick with promoting whatever they're on or just shooting shiat around. You'll notice that with comedians, it's almost always them just having fun.

Crewmannumber6:Thorndyke Barnhard: Crewmannumber6: Did he mention that he's an athiest? Because he like to mention that he's an athiest.

He doesn't realy mention it much unless Piers Morgan asks him about it. Though, I notice that YouTube makes it look like he exists only in the context of the Atheist debate. Nobody even knew he was an atheist until he had two popular tv series and years of celebritydom under his belt.

Not entirely true. Last time he was on TDS he spent the whole segment on it, including unveiling his athiest christmas cards. I wasn't really offended, justnot amused

Apparently it goes without saying that you have no God when you are having furry fantasies about being a raccoon-raping panda who turns the raccoons around and humps them in the eyes.

I read the comments first. Farkers said they were "in tears" and the video was "pee-your-pants hilarious." I then watched the video. There was not a single LOL moment for me. Not even a chuckle. Their conversation sounded like something a couple adolescent boys would talk about, or college students who are really really bored. Is animal sex new to you guys or something? Seems pretty standard, really. Maybe it's because I had a similar discussion when the Liger came out.

I'm sober right now, so there's that. Of course, I also don't have a man crush on John Stewart of Ricky Gervais which might be part of the problem. Was the video really that funny? Maybe if I get high and watch it I might find my LOL moment. I was really hoping for an LOL moment. I wanted to pee in my pants and cry from how awesomely hilarious the video was supposed to be.

jjwars1:I read the comments first. Farkers said they were "in tears" and the video was "pee-your-pants hilarious." I then watched the video. There was not a single LOL moment for me. Not even a chuckle. Their conversation sounded like something a couple adolescent boys would talk about, or college students who are really really bored. Is animal sex new to you guys or something? Seems pretty standard, really. Maybe it's because I had a similar discussion when the Liger came out.

I'm sober right now, so there's that. Of course, I also don't have a man crush on John Stewart of Ricky Gervais which might be part of the problem. Was the video really that funny? Maybe if I get high and watch it I might find my LOL moment. I was really hoping for an LOL moment. I wanted to pee in my pants and cry from how awesomely hilarious the video was supposed to be.

I'm leaving depressed.

I wasn't really pissing my pants either. For me it was more of a "heh, I can't believe they're actually talking about this".

jjwars1:I read the comments first. Farkers said they were "in tears" and the video was "pee-your-pants hilarious." I then watched the video. There was not a single LOL moment for me. Not even a chuckle. Their conversation sounded like something a couple adolescent boys would talk about, or college students who are really really bored. Is animal sex new to you guys or something? Seems pretty standard, really. Maybe it's because I had a similar discussion when the Liger came out.

I'm sober right now, so there's that. Of course, I also don't have a man crush on John Stewart of Ricky Gervais which might be part of the problem. Was the video really that funny? Maybe if I get high and watch it I might find my LOL moment. I was really hoping for an LOL moment. I wanted to pee in my pants and cry from how awesomely hilarious the video was supposed to be.

I'm leaving depressed.

What did you expect? If i was sitting in my underwear and watching it on a computer monitor, i probably wouldn't find it that funny either.

moralpanic:jjwars1: I read the comments first. Farkers said they were "in tears" and the video was "pee-your-pants hilarious." I then watched the video. There was not a single LOL moment for me. Not even a chuckle. Their conversation sounded like something a couple adolescent boys would talk about, or college students who are really really bored. Is animal sex new to you guys or something? Seems pretty standard, really. Maybe it's because I had a similar discussion when the Liger came out.

I'm sober right now, so there's that. Of course, I also don't have a man crush on John Stewart of Ricky Gervais which might be part of the problem. Was the video really that funny? Maybe if I get high and watch it I might find my LOL moment. I was really hoping for an LOL moment. I wanted to pee in my pants and cry from how awesomely hilarious the video was supposed to be.

I'm leaving depressed.

What did you expect? If i was sitting in my underwear and watching it on a computer monitor, i probably wouldn't find it that funny either.

Oh man, so that's what I was doing wrong! I didn't realize my clothing choice made things funnier! Next time I'll wear a fun Hawaiian t-shirt and some flip flops, because these non-pleated cargo khakis aren't working so well.

Oh! I also didn't realize things are not funny if seen through a monitor over that other thing that is exactly like a monitor. I should hook my computer up to the other monitor instead of my current monitor so it will be funnier.

I guess I was one of the few who thought the whole interview was a race to the bottom, with Gervais grabbing hold of the lowest common denominator from the start and Stewart having no control whatsoever. I think it goes against TDS's effort to be smart humor for smart people. This kind of thing is for the idiots at Jackass, not TDS.

jjwars1:I read the comments first. Farkers said they were "in tears" and the video was "pee-your-pants hilarious." I then watched the video. There was not a single LOL moment for me. Not even a chuckle. Their conversation sounded like something a couple adolescent boys would talk about, or college students who are really really bored. Is animal sex new to you guys or something? Seems pretty standard, really. Maybe it's because I had a similar discussion when the Liger came out.

I'm sober right now, so there's that. Of course, I also don't have a man crush on John Stewart of Ricky Gervais which might be part of the problem. Was the video really that funny? Maybe if I get high and watch it I might find my LOL moment. I was really hoping for an LOL moment. I wanted to pee in my pants and cry from how awesomely hilarious the video was supposed to be.

Chotchkie's:I guess I was one of the few who thought the whole interview was a race to the bottom, with Gervais grabbing hold of the lowest common denominator from the start and Stewart having no control whatsoever. I think it goes against TDS's effort to be smart humor for smart people. This kind of thing is for the idiots at Jackass, not TDS.

Some people love both Dr. Strangelove and Dumb & Dumber, and don't feel ashamed of either simply because they don't quite fit into the same box.

I saw this last night when it was on and maybe chuckled a couple times nothing that hilarious. The panda bit reminded me of some Australian comics stand up routine http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eqUtK61SOs NSFW,language. Meh different pokes for different folks I guess.