Is educational neuroscience a waste of money?

Educational neuroscience has little to offer schools or children’s education, according to new research from the University of Bristol. In a controversial research paper published in Psychological Review, Professor Jeffrey Bowers of Bristol’s School of Experimental Psychology warns that schools are investing in expensive interventions because they claim a neuroscientific basis. However, the paper points out that understanding the role of different structures of the brain does not actually help improve teaching or assessing how children progress in a classroom setting. Professor Bowers said: “Educational neuroscience only tells us what we know already or gives us information that is irrelevant. The problems faced by classroom teachers dealing with learning difficulties can only be diagnosed and addressed through behavioural methods.” Examples of pointless educational neuroscience findings highlighted by Professor Bowers include:…