SB368-AA2,1,864. Page 24, line 13: after "wetland." insert "As part of the preapplication 7meeting, the department shall identify and establish the scope of the analysis of 8practicable alternatives that will be required.".

SB368-AA2,2,218. Page 24 line 20: after "consequences." insert "The application shall also 2include a description of the proposed mitigation method as required under sub. (3r)".

SB368-AA2,2,1539. Page 27, line 17: after "sub. (3m) (b)." insert "The department shall limit the 4scope of the practicable alternatives that will be considered and shall determine 5which possible alternatives are practicable in a manner that is consistent with the 6memorandum of understanding entered into between the U.S. environmental 7protection agency and the U.S. army corps of engineers relating to the level of 8analysis required for evaluating compliance with 1333 USC 1344b that is in effect 9on the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date]. In order for an 10alternative that would be implemented at a site that is not owned by the applicant 11at the time the application is submitted and that would be located more than 12one-half mile from the discharge to be considered practicable, the applicant must be 13reasonably able to acquire, expand into, or otherwise manage the site in a manner 14that will fulfill the basic purpose of the proposed discharge or the proposed project 15of which the proposed discharge would be a part.".

SB368-AA2,3,222"(am) Standards for issuing permits. The department shall make a finding that 23a proposed project causing a discharge is in compliance with water quality standards 1and that a wetland individual permit may be issued if the department determines 2that all of the following requirements are met:

SB368-AA2,3,76
2. All practicable measures to minimize the adverse impacts to wetland 7functional values will be taken.

SB368-AA2,3,108
3. The proposed project will not result in significant adverse impact to wetland 9functional values, in significant adverse impact to water quality, or in other 10significant adverse environmental consequences.".

SB368-AA2,3,1715"4m. The impact that any mitigation required under sub. (3r) will cause to the 16functional values of the wetlands that are located in the watershed in which the 17discharge will occur.

SB368-AA2,3,1918
5m. The net positive or negative environmental impact of the proposed project 19on the watershed in which the discharge will occur.".

SB368-AA2,3,242118. Page 31, line 18: after "discharge." insert "The ratios shall include 22incentives for mitigation that will be located in the same watershed in which the 23discharge will occur or that will replace the wetland types and functions that are 24most needed in the watershed in which the discharge will occur.".

SB368-AA2,4,88"
Section 141m. 281.36 (14) (b) and (c) of the statutes are created to read:

SB368-AA2,4,99
281.36 (14) (b) The report under par. (a) shall include all of the following:

SB368-AA2,4,1110
1. The number of preapplication meetings held during the previous 2-year 11period and a report on the results of these meetings.

SB368-AA2,4,1412
2. A summary of the types of discharges that were approved during the 13previous 2-year period. The summary shall specify the locations of the discharges 14and the types of projects involved.

SB368-AA2,4,1715
3. A summary of the mitigation performed during the previous 2-year period. 16The summary shall include a description of mitigation projects approved, 17accomplished, and monitored during the 2-year period.

SB368-AA2,4,1918
4. The number of wetland individual permits denied in the previous 2-year 19period and a summary of the reasons for the denials.

SB368-AA2,4,2220
5. An accounting covering the previous 2-year period showing the amounts 21credited to, the amounts appropriated from, and the balance in the appropriation 22under s. 20.370 (4) (bm).

SB368-AA2,5,21(c) The information under par. (b) 1. to 5. will be required beginning with the 2report that is due no later than January 31, 2015.".