A reader's journal sharing the insights of various authors and my take on a variety of topics, most often philosophy, religion & spirituality, politics, history, economics, and works of literature. Come to think of it, diet and health, too!

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Brene Brown is a bit of a celebrity after her viral TED Talk, but she seems
not to have suffered from it. This book and the video that I link to below
continue to reveal a person striving for greater understanding and a better
world. The fact that she refers to things that are “shitty” in her book and
talk only adds to her street cred. The situations that she describes are
sometimes just that ("shitty") and her willingness not to mince words
on the subject only adds credence to her academic work and 13,000 interviews.

This 2012 book follows upon her two earlier books. For her inspiration, she
cites a famous speech given by Teddy Roosevelt after his presidency. Because of
its importance to Ms. Brown and to her work—and because it stands out in its
own right—I share her quote from it in full (with just a bit more):

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong
man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The
credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by
dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short
again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but
who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the
great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in
the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at
least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those
cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.

Brown cites this as the definition of vulnerability. In some sense, the
entire book is a riff of this speech (minus TR’s more machismo elements).
Indeed, Brown’s anecdotes about her personal experiences as presenter,
researcher, spouse, and parent make the whole project personal in the sense
that the stories she shares (appropriately) bring her insights into the realm
of experiences of her readers and listeners.

Brown argues that shame—the feeling or belief that we are inadequate—is
ubiquitous. It’s different than guilt, which arises from specific actions or
omissions. Although she does not use this term, I sense that we might consider
shame as a species of original sin, impossible to escape. We can only
cope. However, the universality of shame provides us with a shared humanity.

Shame can arise from any area of life: physical traits, relationships,
work, sex, play—you name it and people can feel a sense of shame. Brown argues
that we have to recognize the reality of shame—we can’t cure it as such—and set it aside. Too
many of us avoid an endeavor that might reveal our shame, such as making
a presentation, entering into a relationship, starting a new business—the list
could prove go on indefinitely. The fact that we share this trait is one key to
helping us overcome its drag upon us. But the most important ingredient for
overcoming our reluctance born of vulnerability is courage. The worse thing
that we can do is to don our vulnerability armor, the ways that we try to
shield ourselves from vulnerability, which can run from physical isolation to
cynicism to perfectionism. Each such strategy shortchanges us.

After defining and identifying the sources of shame and our common
strategies in attempting to allay our fears, Brown explores typical situations
in parenting, work, and relationships. Lots of examples that we all can recognize.

The common requirement in every endeavor is the courage that TR speaks
about in the opening quote. You must also learn to discern voices. Some
critics, including yourself (maybe), are worth listening to. We need to learn,
and learning includes criticism. We’re not perfect, and we need feedback in to
improve. But we must ignore some critics, those shouting (or posting) from the
cheap seats. Only those who have entered the arena, taken the risks, and (I
argue) shared the goals to which you aspire, qualify as critics to whom you
should listen. I’d add goodwill as a qualification as well, those who wish for
you to succeed and perform well. I can imagine rivals or the jealous holding motivations
that poison their judgments.

I try to remember these when I consider criticizing any athletic
performance or the actions of a political leader. Really? Do I have the
responsibility, that level of skill? Am I in that game or holding that office?
When someone boos at an athletic event, my thoughts usually consider the
persons booing as losers who’ve never been in the arena. Likewise, among
political leaders, we can and should disagree in a democracy when we believe
ourselves justified, but we should do so with a sense of respect and humility.
Some leaders are venal and inadequate, but far too often the most voracious
criticism comes from those who are ill informed and who are not even rank
amateurs.

If you want the 20 minute executive summary of the book, watch this video, where Brown shares
the essence of her book with a live audience.

About Me

I am currently living in Bucharest, Romania with my wife. I offer services as a freelance lawyer to other lawyers in the U.S. and abroad. I also blog @ http://sngabroad.blogspot.com and at http://greenleafadvocacy.com/persuasive-life-blog/