Hi all,
I'm currently discussing with the developers for Fan
(http://fandev.org/), a JVM/CLR language, the possibility of them
relicensing or dual-licensing from the Academic Free License.
Current discussion thread here:
http://fandev.org/sidewalk/topic/777
The main concern seems to be that whatever new license they pick has
patent defense clauses, and the developer that responded, Brian, is
under the opinion that the Apache license does not provide this
(IANAL, but my reading is that it does).
We are likely able to convince them to switch to either ASL 2.0 or
(L)GPLv3+, so if someone from the legal team (Spot?) could address
this concern, we have one more application that suddenly can
interoperate with more FLOSS libraries.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim

Hi all,
I'm currently discussing with the developers for Fan
(http://fandev.org/), a JVM/CLR language, the possibility of them
relicensing or dual-licensing from the Academic Free License.
Current discussion thread here:
http://fandev.org/sidewalk/topic/777
The main concern seems to be that whatever new license they pick has
patent defense clauses, and the developer that responded, Brian, is
under the opinion that the Apache license does not provide this
(IANAL, but my reading is that it does).
We are likely able to convince them to switch to either ASL 2.0 or
(L)GPLv3+, so if someone from the legal team (Spot?) could address
this concern, we have one more application that suddenly can
interoperate with more FLOSS libraries.

Brian's comment is correct: the patent termination provision in the
Apache License 2.0, if triggered, results merely in a loss of patent
licenses, not in termination of the copyright license. By contrast, the
patent termination feature of (L)GPLv3, if triggered, terminates (at
the licensor's option, and subject to the cure provisions) the entire
license, including copyright as well as patent licenses.
- RF