Abstract

The binding energy is of great importance in understanding the formation and stability of noncovalent interactions. However, the determination of the binding energy with high precision and efficiency in medium- and long-range noncovalent interactions is still challenging for quantum chemistry. Here, we assess the performance of random-phase approximation (RPA), a fully non-local fifth-rung of the Jacob ladder functional, in determining the binding energy of cation–π systems (cation = Li+, Na+, Be2+, Mg2+, Al+, and NH4+; π = C6H6), which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been investigated. Using experimental results as the benchmark, we systematically compared the RPA method to the other ab initio methods (DFT/B3LYP, MP2, CCSD(T), and QCISD(T)) both in calculation accuracy and efficiency. From the perspective of accuracy, RPA is the best among these approaches, followed by the CCSD(T) and QCISD(T) methods. DFT/B3LYP and MP2 provide the worst accuracy. In addition, the computational efficiency of RPA is much faster than that of CCSD(T) and QCISD(T). We believe that RPA is a robust method for the precise description of medium- and long-range noncovalent interactions and is capable of providing benchmarking data. The interaction strength and interaction nature of cation–π systems are further analyzed by atoms in molecules (AIM) and the color-mapped reduced density gradient (RDG) isosurface, which are consistent with the characteristics of a typical cation–π interaction.

Authors contributing to RSC publications (journal articles, books or book chapters)
do not need to formally request permission to reproduce material contained in this
article provided that the correct acknowledgement is given with the reproduced material.

Reproduced material should be attributed as follows:

For reproduction of material from NJC:
Reproduced from Ref. XX with permission from the Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique (CNRS) and The Royal Society of Chemistry.

For reproduction of material from PCCP:
Reproduced from Ref. XX with permission from the PCCP Owner Societies.

For reproduction of material from PPS:
Reproduced from Ref. XX with permission from the European Society for Photobiology,
the European Photochemistry Association, and The Royal Society of Chemistry.

For reproduction of material from all other RSC journals and books:
Reproduced from Ref. XX with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

If the material has been adapted instead of reproduced from the original RSC publication
"Reproduced from" can be substituted with "Adapted from".

In all cases the Ref. XX is the XXth reference in the list of references.

If you are the author of this article you do not need to formally request permission
to reproduce figures, diagrams etc. contained in this article in third party publications
or in a thesis or dissertation provided that the correct acknowledgement is given
with the reproduced material.

Reproduced material should be attributed as follows:

For reproduction of material from NJC:
[Original citation] - Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and the RSC

For reproduction of material from PCCP:
[Original citation] - Reproduced by permission of the PCCP Owner Societies

For reproduction of material from PPS:
[Original citation] - Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the
European Society for Photobiology, the European Photochemistry Association, and
RSC

For reproduction of material from all other RSC journals:
[Original citation] - Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry

If you are the author of this article you still need to obtain permission to reproduce
the whole article in a third party publication with the exception of reproduction
of the whole article in a thesis or dissertation.

Information about reproducing material from RSC articles with different licences
is available on our Permission Requests page.