From the time the Pilgrims arrived on American soil, faith in God played an important part in shaping our nation. Images of Moses adorn the Supreme Court in recognition of the Judeo-Christian origin of our laws. But it was Taxes, loss of Liberty and oppression from a mad king that led our Founding Fathers to write The Declaration of Independence and start The American Revolution. Today, those who stand for these ideals no longer call themselves The Silent Majority because we are silent no more.

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Barbara Walters admitted the other day that she once thought Barack Hussein Obama was the Messiah. That was then and this is now. The same Barbara Walters must have had her health insurance cancelled because she has just declared that Hillary Clinton is the Messiah-ette of 2013. A lot of people in the left-wing news media must have agreed that Obama was some sort of messiah because they were talking about him with the same hushed tones of reverence you would normally hear in church. Except Chris Mathews who had to inject his semi-pornographic comment about Obama giving him a thrill up his leg. And all those halo pictures were getting to be a bit too obvious.

So much for the ups and downs of Obama's spiritual reputation. The real reality is that Barry Soetoro //aka// Barack Hussein Obama doesn't know anything about being a messiah and his most notable creation ObamaCare, the signature law he championed, is crumbling into a pile of dust at his feet - sort of God-like in reverse. And the liberal mainstream news media is beginning to report it.After ramrodding ObamaCare through Congress with only the Democrats voting for it and government officials declaring it the law of the land that nobody was allowed to read before voting on it, Obama has exercised dictatorial powers not authorized in the Constitution and changed the law a half-dozen times in order to fix every problem that crops up. Here is what others have to say about the latest changes.Wall Street Journal

Under pressure from Senate Democrats, the President partly suspends the individual mandate.

Opinion Dec. 20, 2013 6:41 p.m. ET

It seems Nancy Pelosi was wrong when she said "we have to pass" ObamaCare to "find out what's in it." No one may ever know because the White House keeps treating the Affordable Care Act's text as a mere suggestion subject to day-to-day revision. Its latest political retrofit is the most brazen: President Obama is partly suspending the individual mandate.

The White House argued at the Supreme Court that the insurance-purchase mandate was not only constitutional but essential to the law's success, while refusing Republican demands to delay or repeal it. But late on Thursday, with only four days to go before the December enrollment deadline, the Health and Human Services Department decreed that millions of Americans are suddenly exempt.

Obamacare madness, Christmas edition.

At this point, after months of on-the-fly pronouncements, delays, and exemptions (often announced, not coincidentally, in the days just before a major national holiday), perhaps nothing should surprise us anymore about Obamacare’s disastrous rollout. But yesterday’s announcement is still startling because of what it says about the state of the president’s signature domestic legislation. The law is falling apart before our eyes.

.... But by conceding that the individual mandate can and should be delayed for one group, the administration has opened a major can of worms. For starters, this exemption is going to strike many Americans as blatantly unfair and arbitrary. It comes at the 11th hour, after millions of people, including those with canceled plans, have already made their choices based on the rules they thought would be in effect. The administration said for months that the mandate would not be waived for anyone, even those with canceled policies, and it vowed a veto of any delay legislation coming out of Congress. Now the rules have been changed, and some families who have committed to pay thousands of dollars in insurance premiums will feel very personally betrayed by an untrustworthy administration.

An untrustworthy administration

Welcome to the newest banana Republic. Democrats in America must be proud of themselves. And Republican Congressman Joe Wilson was right after all when he mouthed the words "YOU LIE" during Obama's State of the Union address. Heck, even the liberal fact checking web site Politifact gave Obama the Lie of the Year Award.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

A scandal that spans three presidencies and more is coming to light. In a non-defined conflict against terrorism, we have lost over 6,750 U.S. service members who have died
in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. American
blood spilled in wars that do not attack those who attacked us on 9-11.
To put this in perspective, fewer died in Pearl Harbor and we nuked the
Japanese. We were told after 9-11, that it was al Qaeda, with no other
state sponsors. If the allegations prove accurate, 9-11 was nothing less than an act of war by Saudi Arabia.

“It’s classified because if it were released, the people
would demand war against Saudi Arabia, and the entire US policy of
having the Sunni Arabs price their oil in US dollars in exchange for
supporting their dictatorships would fall apart.”– Comment left at Hot Air (Hat Tip: The Radio Patriot)

According to the New York Post, Democratic Rep. Stephen
Lynch and Republican Rep. Walter Jones have come forward with solid
accusations claiming that 28 pages from the 2002 report on 9-11, were
not only redacted, they were blank except for an on-going ellipsis. The
28 pages were purportedly removed by President Bush when the report was
released, but are now leaking out 12 years later:

President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the
800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this
critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank,
except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this
story by comparison is about 1,000 words).

A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say
they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement
in the attacks.

Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can’t
reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law. So
they’ve proposed Congress pass a resolution asking President Obama to
declassify the entire 2002 report, “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence
Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September
11, 2001.”

Some information already has leaked from the classified section,
which is based on both CIA and FBI documents, and it points back to
Saudi Arabia, a presumed ally.

The Saudis deny any role in 9/11, but the CIA in one memo
reportedly found “incontrovertible evidence” that Saudi government
officials — not just wealthy Saudi hardliners, but high-level diplomats
and intelligence officers employed by the kingdom — helped the hijackers
both financially and logistically. The intelligence files cited in the
report directly implicate the Saudi embassy in Washington and consulate
in Los Angeles in the attacks, making 9/11 not just an act of terrorism,
but an act of war.

As Ed Morrissey of Hot Air
points out, the intel Sperry cites will eventually be discredited or
the executive branch will be implicated in the interference with one or
both reports.

Three Strikes And You Are Out

Buck Sexton
at TheBlaze last night said that he thought that the redaction was
either to cover embarrassment for incompetency on the part of our
intelligence agencies (the fact that no one was minding the store), or
that our government was complicit in aiding and abetting the Saudis.
Here are some facts for you:

1. Clinton and his intelligence agencies knew full well what bin
Laden intended. Bin Laden stated it in 1998 and carried it out in 2001. I
see no way that our agencies didn’t know it was a grave possibility.

2. Bush put the Saudis on a plane right after 9-11 and sent them
home. No questions asked, right after the murder of 3,000 Americans and
the largest terrorist attack on US soil ever.

3. At least one Saudi was involved in the Boston bombing. He was hurt
and hospitalized. Michelle Obama visited him in the hospital. He was
given safe passage back to Saudi Arabia and he visited the White House
afterwards.

Three strikes and you are out.

I believed in President Bush when 9-11 happened. He seemed a hero for his actions right after the attack. Now those actions are clouded
and it would seem that those branded conspiracy nuts on both sides of
the aisle, were in part right. I still don’t buy the wackier conspiracy
theories that you will find out there and I will never be a Truther.
But, I have for a long time pointed out the involvement of Saudi Arabia
and Iran as well in the attacks. Now there seems to be strong evidence
against Saudi Arabia who has denied their involvement since the
beginning. Denials that were suspect to begin with since 15 of the 19
bombers were from Saudi Arabia.The New York Post has laid out the now expanding evidence
that Saudi agents, officials and operatives in several states, including
Virginia, Florida, California and DC, gave funding and/or intelligence
to the hijackers in 2001. If true, explain to me how that is not an act
of war?

Karl Denninger put it better than I can and got right to the heart of the matter:

It’s obvious given what happened, the logistical and
funding requirements and where the hijackers came from along with
inexplicable actions immediately following the attacks – unless our
government explicitly let certain people flee.

Yet we went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan while helping the Saudis — the very people who attacked us.

And Obama, to this day, kisses the Saudi King.[...]

It makes a very convincing case that the Saudi Government was
involved in an act of war against the United States. Not simply
terrorism — remember, the Pentagon, a military target, was one of the
locations hit. The other intended target for the plane that went down
in PA was the Capitol.

You awake yet America?

You damn well should be.

It’s about damn time that the mainstream media started talking
about this — you’re only a decade late, *******s. And no, people like
myself who have been saying this all along are not nuts.

We’re right.

And American blood flows, while we protect those who kill us. Sheer
insanity. Obama literally bows to the Saudi King and it would appear
that Bush and Clinton did as well. I can’t get the image out of my head
of Bush holding hands with the King of Saudi Arabia. That blood is as
black as oil. No one has ever solved or revealed who made the killing in
the stock market by shorting airline stocks during all this. That needs
to be answered.

Eight Trillion has been spent on security since 9-11 and we are less
secure now than we were then. Does anyone really believe this is not on
purpose? Incompetency only goes so far; evil intent is forever. We have
been lied to over and over and over again. We see it going on every day
and feel helpless to stop it. We must put a stop to this. These elite
Progressives are getting wealthy off the deaths of our people and are
redistributing every last dime America has. By design, they are bringing
us to our knees and forcing us into a dictatorship. They have no
reverence for the Constitution, for our laws or our branches of
government. Do you trust our government anymore? I don’t – not on either
side of the political spectrum.

Inside The Saudi 9/11 Coverup

Read the New York Post’s investigative piece in its entirety: Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup.
I would very much like to know what is in those 28 pages. I want to
know if this is another contrived attempt to smear Bush and Republicans,
or if they were complicit in aiding the Saudis. I want the truth:

Democrat Bob Graham, the former Florida senator who
chaired the Joint Inquiry, has asked the FBI for the Sarasota case
files, but can’t get a single, even heavily redacted, page released. He
says it’s a “coverup.”

Is the federal government protecting the Saudis? Case agents tell me
they were repeatedly called off pursuing 9/11 leads back to the Saudi
Embassy, which had curious sway over White House and FBI responses to
the attacks.

Just days after Bush met with the Saudi ambassador in the White
House, the FBI evacuated from the United States dozens of Saudi
officials, as well as Osama bin Laden family members. Bandar made the
request for escorts directly to FBI headquarters on Sept. 13, 2001 —
just hours after he met with the president. The two old family friends
shared cigars on the Truman Balcony while discussing the attacks.

Bill Doyle, who lost his son in the World Trade Center attacks and
heads the Coalition of 9/11 Families, calls the suppression of Saudi
evidence a “coverup beyond belief.” Last week, he sent out an e-mail to
relatives urging them to phone their representatives in Congress to
support the resolution and read for themselves the censored 28 pages.

Astonishing as that sounds, few lawmakers in fact have bothered to
read the classified section of arguably the most important investigation
in US history.

Granted, it’s not easy to do. It took a month long letter-writing
campaign by Jones and Lynch to convince the House intelligence panel to
give them access to the material.

But it’s critical they take the time to read it and pressure the
White House to let all Americans read it. This isn’t water under the
bridge. The information is still relevant ­today. Pursuing leads
further, getting to the bottom of the foreign support, could help head
off another 9/11.

As the frustrated Joint Inquiry authors warned, in an overlooked
addendum to their heavily redacted 2002 report, “State-sponsored
terrorism substantially increases the likelihood of successful and more
­lethal attacks within the United States.”

Their findings must be released, even if they forever change US-Saudi
relations. If an oil-rich foreign power was capable of orchestrating
simultaneous bulls-eye hits on our centers of commerce and defense a
dozen years ago, it may be able to pull off similarly devastating
attacks today.

Members of Congress reluctant to read the full report ought to remember that the 9/11 assault missed its fourth target: them.

If any of this is true, America will never be the same. Our leaders
should be forewarned that the public will not be pleased – the woodshed
will have a long line on this one and tar and feathers will be handed
out judiciously. We always knew that Saudi Arabia was involved, but this
takes it to a new level. When a country’s government sanctions and
helps with a terrorist attack of another country, ally or not, it is an
act of war. Thanks to Obama, we are too weak after gutting our military
to go to war. But if Saudi Arabia’s government was involved, then
America needs to clean out our government now, beef up our military and
go on a road trip to the land of oil and do a smack down of epic
proportions.

The enemies within and without seem to have been shrouding an act of war
and Americans need to wrest control of our Republic back into the hands
of patriots. As Judson Phillips says, we should remember there are
certain crimes that have no statute of limitations.

I did not start viewing Duck Dynasty until a few months ago. It has
since become our favorite show and we can’t get enough of it. Christian
values, real people, guns and hunting – what’s not to love? But it would
seem that being a Christian and espousing your beliefs in America is
now becoming ever more dangerous. As RedState pointed out, ultimately you will care and you will have to take a stand and take sides.

“Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from
there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and
that woman and those men,” he told GQ, before paraphrasing the Bible in
Corinthians. “Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters,
the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the
drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers — they won’t inherit the
kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”

For telling the truth and stating what he personally believed,
A&E put him on indefinite hiatus. They fired him. I would be very
surprised if the family did not tell A&E to stuff it. They managed
to take THE most popular rated show ever and scuttle
it. Phil had told A&E earlier that if they insisted he remove God or
guns from his show, they were through:

On May 9, Greensboro, NC country station 93.1 The Wolf reported that after receiving complaints over prayers to God and the frequent use of guns on air, Duck Dynasty
patriarch Phil Robertson said, “God and guns are part of our everyday
lives [and] to remove either of them from the show is unacceptable.”

Free speech is an endangered species. Those “intolerants”
hatin’ and taking on the Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing his
personal opinion are taking on all of us.

She’s right and this will backfire on A&E and all the others out
there that are anti-Christian. Phil Robertson just became a warrior for
God and the Constitution and I am sure he is up to the task. An attack
on one Christian, is an attack on all of us. Time to draw our line in
the Marxist sand.

Drudge headlined this whole shameful turn of events on his site this morning with: “Roasted ‘Duck’ – Leader Fired After Gay Rant. The title is misleading as I don’t consider Phil’s statement as a rant, but a confirmation of his beliefs and faith. He has a right
according to the First Amendment to state his views. And while A&E
has a right to run their channel as they see fit, they obviously care
more about the rights of Gays than they do of Christians and they fear
the backlash from the LGBT community and their supporters. They don’t
give a crap about Constitutional rights and evidently they are willing
to throw away millions in revenue to placate a certain segment of
society. That pretty much says it all, doesn’t it? A&E chose sides with GLAAD,
took a stand and walked off a cliff. It’s okay for militant Gays to
attack Christians and hunt them down, but when a Christian stands up and
says what he believes… well, that’s hate don’t ya know.

A&E has placed Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson
on indefinite hiatus following anti-gay remarks he made in a recent
profile in GQ.

“We are extremely disappointed to have read Phil Robertson’s
comments in GQ, which are based on his own personal beliefs and are not
reflected in the series Duck Dynasty,” A&E said in a statement.

“His personal views in no way reflect those of A+E Networks, who
have always been strong supporters and champions of the LGBT community.
The network has placed Phil under hiatus from filming indefinitely.”

The news comes after Robertson compared homosexuality to
bestiality in an interview with the magazine. He’ll likely appear in
season four, which bows Jan. 15, since production is largely wrapped.

I’m not a boycotter, but in this case, I’m definitely willing to make an exception. I’ll do my shopping at the Duck Commander site, thank you very much.

A&E and Phil Robertson both put their beliefs ahead of profits.
One for God, the other for political correctness. Through tolerance, evil progresses. Many Christians are afraid to state what they believe because of a politically correct, 1984 environment imposed on America by our Marxist leaders.

Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.

Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy

Christians should remember that quote, because you must take a stand, just as Phil Robertson and his family have done.

The dishonest and criminal faction of GLAAD is now on a Christian
hunt for Duck Dynasty. GLAAD called Phil’s comments vile and
stereotypically outdated – so Christianity is passe according to GLAAD? Color me not surprised. GLAAD has no idea what a true Christian believes. Red State has this to say:

The secular left believes otherwise. GLAAD spokesman
Wilson Cruz, in a laughably ridiculous statement, responded to Robertson
by saying, “Phil and his family claim to be Christian, but Phil’s lies
about an entire community fly in the face of what true Christians
believe.”

Actually, Robertson said precisely what true Christians believe and
anyone, including A & E, letting GLAAD be an arbiter of true
Christian thought is pretty quickly destined for hell fire.

A & E has now joined much of mass market culture in the Western
World in picking sides in a fight — tolerance for gay rights, but not
for Christians expressing honest answers to questions asked of their
faith. The only surprise is that the Christians of Duck Dynasty could
last there as long as they did. A&E has as much right to do this as
you have to turn the channel. But they have clearly aligned themselves
against us in the culture wars.

The world is at war with Christ and those who put their faith in
Christ. The silver lining of this act is that many Christians who
decided they could sit on the sidelines and not have to care will have a
wake up call — particularly millennial Christians.

The Church, however, must show it will stand with those who stand
with Christ and not shy away from this fight lest too many weak and new
Christians go wobbly and silent.

You will be made to care. You will not be given the option of silence or sitting on the sidelines.

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an
employer – to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or
otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his
compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of
such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;

I wouldn’t hold your breath that Obama and the DOJ will do anything
on this though. They are quietly cheering on the sidelines as this
happens. They are just about as anti-Christian as they come – you will
find the Obama Administration in support of Islam, but not Christianity…
period.

“I myself am a product of the 60s; I centered my life
around sex, drugs and rock and roll until I hit rock bottom and accepted
Jesus as my Savior,” he said. “My mission today is to go forth and tell
people about why I follow Christ and also what the Bible teaches, and
part of that teaching is that women and men are meant to be together.

“However, I would never treat anyone with disrespect just because
they are different from me. We are all created by the Almighty and like
Him, I love all of humanity. We would all be better off if we loved God
and loved each other.”

Let me tell you something… I have walked with God all my life. That
doesn’t mean I didn’t stray – a lot. I have a colorful history to say
the least. But I am a Christian now and forever and I share Phil’s
views. There should be room out there for everyone to have their own
views and lead their own lives. Whatever choices one makes is between
them and God. It is not for our leaders and politicians to decide for us
what is right and what is wrong. A&E made a horrific, knee jerk
reaction which will cost them dearly.

I believe that GQ is complicit in all this. I think they set Phil up
and he knew it and did not care. He’s a man of faith and principle.
Traits so foreign to the Left as to be alien in thier strangeness to
them. But if they were rocked by Duck Dynasty, they better hold on to
their hats. Things are about to get interesting.

Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Ann Coulter and possibly Rush Limbaugh, are teaming up. That’s right folks.
They are talking, working together and appearing together. Despite the
attempts of the Left and many on the Right to keep them apart, an
alliance has formed and Progressives should be very, very concerned.

I also would have to believe that Glenn Beck would find a home for Duck Dynasty with TheBlaze.
That would be funny and ironic. I certainly hope that happens. Glenn
Beck believes in the Constitution and religious freedom as does the Duck
Dynasty family. It’s a match made in, well you know… The silencing of
the ducks has just turned into the resurgence of Christianity.

While Obama guts the American military… as we disarm and as we dismantle our nuclear capabilities, Russia is upping the ante.
The ‘flexibility’ that Obama was whispering to Russia not long ago, was
a reassurance that he would neuter us militarily. Russia busily began strengthening their nuclear arsenals.

Poland and three Baltic states have voiced their alarm
over plans by Russia to move nuclear-capable missiles close to their
borders.

“Plans to deploy Iskander-M missiles in the Kaliningrad district
are disturbing and Poland has said so many times,” its foreign ministry
said in a statement.

Warsaw said it had received no official word from Moscow about
the deployment, which a Russian defence ministry spokesman confirmed on
Monday.

“This is a matter for NATO and we can expect possible consultations and action (…) at the NATO and EU level,” it added.

Relations with Russia have been frosty since Poland shed communism in 1989 and went on to join NATO a decade later.

Baltic states Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have also had
difficult ties with Moscow since they broke free from the Soviet Union
in 1990-91 and joined the EU and NATO in 2004.

“It is clear that it is alarming news as it is one of the
arguments changing balance of powers in our region,” Latvia’s Defence
Minister Artis Pabriks said Monday, quoted by the Baltic News Service
(BNS).

“It does not change the balance of power between NATO and Russia,
but it changes balance of power in the region. It threatens several
Baltic cities,” he added.

He was echoed by Estonia and Lithuania whose defence ministers termed the move both “alarming” and “cause for concern”.

The Russian deployment comes in response to the planned US-led deployment of a disputed air defence shield.

The advanced version of the Russian missile has a range of 500km
and could potentially be used to take out ground-based radar and
interceptors of the new NATO shield.

The Kremlin warned in 2011 that it could station the short- and
medium-range ballistic missiles along the European Union’s eastern
frontier in response to NATO’s missile defence programme.

War is not coming, it is here. The Cold War shifted and our enemies
infiltrated us. The Russians, Chinese and Islamists are within our own
walls and we have handed them the keys to the American kingdom. As Sun
Tzu says: “All war is deception.” We’ve been had. Either the coup from
within will be complete, exposing our soft national underbelly to our
enemies, or due to military weakness, our enemies will decide now is the
time that America can be attacked. She is at her weakest militarily,
financially and morally. Our enemy’s odds of victory grow by the day due
to our Progressive leadership. It is not incompetence… it is a
contrived malignant evil intention that has been painstakingly planned
and executed behind the scenes. Our rulers tell us that our enemies are
our friends and our friends are our enemies. We are down the communist
rabbit hole with no way out, except to return to the Reagan Doctrine of (1) peace through strength; (2) trust but verify; and (3) beware of evil in the modern world.

The Russians have no use for the faux US nuclear treaties with them. They were never meant to restrict Russia, just America:

MOSCOW (Reuters) – Russia will begin deploying a new type
of long-range missile in 2018 to replace a Cold War standby known in
the West as “Satan”, a military commander said on Tuesday in a signal to
the United States that Moscow is improving its nuclear arsenal.

A new Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) called the Sarmat is
being developed to supplant the RS-20B Voyevoda, the Interfax news
agency quoted the commander of Russia’s Strategic Rocket Forces, General
Sergei Karakayev, as saying.
“We are counting on being armed with this qualitatively new missile system … by 2018-2020,” he was quoted as saying.

The Voyevoda, whose NATO name is the SS-18 Satan, was developed in
the 1970s and the missiles are approaching the end of their service
life. Karakayev said some of the ICBMs would remain in service until
2022.

The commander spoke on the anniversary of the creation in 1959 of the
Strategic Rocket Forces, the military branch in charge of the ICBMs
that were the stuff of nightmares in the United States during the
superpower standoff of the Soviet era.
Russia and the United States signed the latest of a series of
treaties restricting the numbers of ICBMs in 2010, but Moscow has
indicated it will not go further in the near future, citing what it says
are potential threats from U.S. weapons systems.

President Vladimir Putin has emphasized that Russia must maintain a
strong nuclear deterrent, in part because of an anti-missile shield the
United States is building in Europe and which Moscow says could
undermine its security.

A pro-Kremlin newspaper reported on Monday that Moscow has deployed
missiles with a range of hundreds of miles in its western exclave of
Kaliningrad, alarming the governments of neighboring Poland and the
Baltic states.

It was unclear whether the Sarmat was a missile that Russia tested in
May 2012 and said should improve Russia’s ability to foil missile
defense systems. The Defense Ministry did not reveal the name of that
missile.

I might add that I would not believe the timelines. I believe that
Russia is beefing up their nukes now, if they have not already done so.
The Chinese have as well. Both are supplying Iran and North Korea. Do
the math as the nuclear countdown clock strikes midnight. Russia is
making nuclear moves, yet the press seems to care not at all. China
challenges us in International waters and the media yawns. Americans
better pay attention or do we feel lucky? Well, do we?

Welcome to the inept foreign policy world of President
Obama. We pivot from the Middle East, destabilizing it and promoting the
rise of Islamic totalitarians. Then we negotiate with the Iranians
while they march forward to a nuclear capability. When we “pivot” to the
Pacific, China threatens one of our ships. We hit the reset button with
Russia, and it’s stuck on stupid. Whatever happened to “peace through
strength?” I’m not digging this “lead from behind” stuff — down South we
call that following.

Before we get into Obama's latest attempt to ram the UN Arms Trade Treaty through the Senate, I'd like to invite you to take a trip back to 1939 with me. It was a time of innocence, when many believed it was not possible for another World War to begin.

On August 31, 1939, Adolph Hitler sent a group of commandos to attack a German radio station in Gleiwitz, near the border with Poland. (The radio tower, pictured here, still stands to this day.)

The
German soldiers were dressed in Polish uniforms. After they seized the
station, they broadcast an anti-German message in Polish (the announcer
had a German accent).

Then,
they executed a group of Polish prisoners who they had dressed up in
Polish army uniforms. This attack is known as the Gleiwitz Incident.

Hitler used this false flag attack to justify his invasion of Poland, which started World War 2.

Although the specifics are different, Obama is using the same sorts of false flag attacks, misdirection, lies and subterfuge to undermine your Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Operation Fast & Furious was a false flag operation designed to kill Americans and Mexicans, so that the federal government could infringe the Second Amendment (the bodies from this operation are still piling up to this day).

The mainstream media presstitutes have declared that this treaty will never pass the Senate. It needs 67 votes to do so.

They said the same thing last week about the Obama-Ryan budget plan which cut retirement benefits to military veterans. Unfortunately, yesterday 12 Republicans who said they would vote "No" on the plan crossed the aisle, giving Obama a 67-33 victory (the same margin

Obama hates the fact that you have a biblical and constitutional right to defend your own life and property against tyrannical government forces.

God approves of your right to self defense against common criminals (Exodus 22:2), corrupt governments (Esther 8:11) and against anyone who wants to kill you for your Christian faith (Luke 22:36).

You can read these Bible verses in full here on this page, where you can also send your FaxGrams to the Senate demanding that they defeat this treaty!

Obama has proven that he is willing to go to any lengths to take away your right to keep and bear arms. Just ask the family members of the two federal officers and the 300 confirmed Mexican citizens who have lost their lives to Fast & Furious weapons.

This blog, all along, stuck to its guns, regarding The One’s bonafides, even when subject to mocking. Regardless, no wishy washy, finger-in-the-air prevarications herein, despite any recriminations. Tsk, tsk. Like water off a duck’s back. In any event, only facts and sound logic underlie this and that. No herd-like mentality on this end.

That being said, who in their rational mind (still) believes the Liar-in-Chief is anything but a fraud? Come on now, even if exposing said fairy tale lends to a cry of “racism”, so what? Where are we, in kindergarten…sticks and stones. But never mind, paradoxically, this egregious charge lands DIRECTLY at Obama’s door as he drags America towards a race war. Topsy turvy.

In this regard, a myriad of proofs prop up “birther’s” claims and they are overwhelming. Undoubtedly,“birthers” are reaching critical mass and Congress will receive an earful.The question becomes: will they step up? Well, it may not matter, since certain events can even surpass their authority, thus, no longer allowing them to close their eyes and muffles their ears. Sounds like music to a patriot’s heart.

It’s the document that Arpaio’s investigators have concluded is fraudulent.

Amid conspiracy theories circulating the Internet, Zullo told WND Friday that Fuddy’s death – she was the only fatality among nine people aboard a small airplane that crashed off the coast of Molokai – appears
to be a tragic accident, not foul play.

He said his investigation does not depend on any information from Fuddy.

“While her death certainly is a tragedy, it in no way hampers our investigation in this matter,” he said. “If people truly believe that her untimely demise was somehow related to an attempt to silence her for
‘what she may or may not know,’ then there are several more people in Hawaii who should be very, very concerned.

“Again, I want to emphasize,” Zullo said, “Sheriff Arpaio and I do not, at this time, believe her death was connected to any nefarious circumstances.”

The birth certificate dispute dates back to before the 2008 election. Critics, including Hillary Clinton, raised the issue about Obama’s status as a “natural-born citizen.” Not defined in the Constitution, it
probably was thought at the time of the writing of the Constitution to be someone born of two citizen parents.

Obama fails that test because his father was a Kenyan student visiting the U.S.

Arpaio assigned his Cold Case Posse to look into the issue before the 2012 election, when constituents approached him and asked him to check whether Obama would be an ineligible candidate on the presidential
election ballot.

In a recent radio interview with Gallups, Zullo affirmed the
investigation had been expanded to the county sheriff’s office and was “moving in a direction that was not anticipated by us.”

“The whole [issue] is more nefarious than you can imagine,” Zullo said, crediting Arpaio for ordering the investigation and sticking with it.

“He knows in his gut that something is wrong,” Zullo said.

Dozens of lawsuits have been filed without success. One case is
pending before the Alabama Supreme Court for which Zullo provided
evidence.

See a report of Fuddy’s death:

Still a live issue

Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s
birth certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the
document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather
than being copied from a genuine paper document.

“Mr. Obama has, in fact, not offered any verifiable authoritative
document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value
as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the
birth event,” he explained. “One of our most serious concerns is that
the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a
computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several
unknown sources.”

Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to
produce an original birth document for Obama, and it should have been
easy to find.

See some of Zullo’s evidence:

More recently, Grace Vuoto of the World Tribune reported
that among the experts challenging the birth certificate is certified
document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an expert for Perkins
Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in eligibility cases.

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer,
Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt
about it,” Zullo told the World Tribune.

“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator
told the news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable
expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth
certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.

“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my
observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live
Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate,
but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from
various sources.”

“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have
never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many
respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,”
he says in the report.

He said Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a
scanning business who also has an accounting background, invested over
two years in an investigation of the authenticity of document.

Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted “exhaustive
research of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on
April 27, 2011 – not the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be
understood,” Hagmann said.

“Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they
conducted extensive examinations of the ‘copy’ that was used as the
basis for the PDF document. They acquired the same type of equipment
that was used back in the late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to
recreate the document presented as an ‘authenticated copy’ proving the
legitimacy of Barack Obama. Instead, they found 20 points of forgery on
that document and detail each point of forgery in the affidavit,” wrote
Hagmann.

“Even more interesting, Mr. Vogt claims to have identified the
‘signature’ of the perpetrator, or the woman who created the forged
document, hidden within the document itself. Her identity, in addition
to the identity of other conspirators and their precise methods are
contained in a sealed document supplementing the public affidavit.”

“First, the dishonesty is shameless and in your face. Mr Obama’s
advisers, once they realized the ‘birth certificate’ was as bogus as a
$3 bill, knew that if they simply went on pretending that $3 bills are
legal tender the hard-left-dominated news media would carefully and
continuously look the other way, pausing occasionally to sneer at anyone
who pointed out that, in this constitutionally crucial respect, the
‘president’ has no clothes,” Monckton wrote.

He said that in Hawaii last year, he watched “as a senior former
state senator called the police and, when they came, handed over to them
compelling evidence that the ‘birth certificate’ had been forged.”

“The police, correctly, passed the file to the state’s attorney general, a ‘Democrat,’ who did nothing about it,” he said.

“In Washington, D.C., I watched as a concerned citizen from Texas
telephoned the FBI and reported the ‘birth certificate’ as being a
forgery. They said they would send two agents to see him within the
hour. No one came.”

Trump
said he can’t be certain that Obama is eligible to be president, and he
pointedly noted that a reporter who was poking fun at the issue
admitted he can’t, either.

Trump repeatedly has insisted Obama has not documented his eligibility. At one point, he offered $5 million to
the charity or charities of Obama’s choice if he would release his
passport records and authorize the colleges he attended to release his
applications and other records.

Trump argues that those documents would show whether or not Obama
ever accepted scholarship or other aid as a foreign student, which could
preclude him from being a “natural-born citizen.”

Trump’s conversation with ABC’s Jonathan Karl started with Karl
noting that Trump took on the “not serious” issue of eligibility.

“Why does that make me not serious?” Trump demanded. “I think that resonated with a lot of people.”

Karl replied: “You don’t still question he was born in the United States, do you?”

“I have no idea,” Trump said. “I don’t know. Was there a birth
certificate? You tell me. You know some people say that was not his
birth certificate. I’m saying I don’t know. Nobody knows, and you don’t
know either. Jonathan you’re a smart guy, and you don’t know.”

When Karl admitted he was “pretty sure,” Trump jumped on the statement.

“You just said you’re pretty sure … you have to be 100 percent sure,”
he said. “Jonathan, you said you’re pretty convinced, so let’s just see
what happens over time.”

Among the many records the Obama camp has refused to release are the
marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann
Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama),
adoption records, records of his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S.
citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani Elementary School
(Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school records,
Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records,
Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with Illinois
State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state
senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.

NOW, getting back to his fake “birth certificate”…. While it is a tad “coincidental” that the only person to die in the recent plane crash is a central player in “Hawaiigate”, and even though many questions loom in the death of Loretta Fuddy, it doesn’t mitigate the explosions coming forward, it just makes them ever more urgent to reveal. But let’s wait and see what “officialdom” has to say about her unfortunate/untimely demise. Oh yeah.

EVEN so, the fact that too many folks linked – in one way or another – to knowledge thereof re Obama’s illegal behavior keep “dropping like flies”,
well, suspicion is in order. Keep one eye peeled open. You think? And
if it turns out that there is no there there, then that’s the way it is.
Case closed.

NO matter. Arpaio’s crew has more than their hands full with
their forthcoming explosive evidence and needn’t be distracted by this “inexplicable” tragedy. Therefore, if they are dismissing – as of now – the latest “fortuitous” Obama-related death, then this blogger understands that their eyes have to stay on particularly incendiary (juggling) balls.

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Blogroll

About Me

My name is Nelson Abdullah. I am 77-years old and after 40 years of working for two major airlines, I retired 15 years ago in 2002, a few months after the 9-11 attack on America. My wife and I have been married for more than 56 years. We celebrated our Golden Anniversary in April 2010.
My wife and I are both lifelong Catholics and registered Republicans.

About this blog

Defending the Constitution.

Our country was created as a Constitutional Republic, a nation of laws, held together by the fabric of the Constitution. The Constitution limits the powers of the government while the first ten amendments, called The Bill of Rights, guarantee the rights of We The People.Defending the Republic.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” —The Declaration of Independence—July 4th, 1776.

Bill of Rights

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.