Our many discussions over the past 4 years have led us to conclude the following things:

1) Our current tax code and federal budget are messed up.

2) We can do a whole lot better, on an individual basis and government basis.

We propose the following to aim at for the future majority, whoever it
may be... We think it will be the growing numbers of millions of
registered Independents across the nation. They tend to be more
socially-libertarian and more fiscally conservative than either of the
major parties today which stands to reason because:

'If the Democrats or the Republicans were 'doing such a great job', no one would ever register as Independent, would they?'
We think the cornerstone of this new 'majority' should be this: 'The Enrichment Society'

This will put to shame the 'Great Society' put forth by LBJ or even the
'New Deal' of FDR based on the concept of giving 'entitlements' to
everyone.

Putting the name 'entitlement' on anything doesn't
seem to be very 'American', does it? The very word 'Entitlement' gives
off a sense of English royalty or something, doesn't it, at its very
core? We think there are Constitutional words against such designations
of entitlement in Section 9 of Article I of said sacred document.

On the other hand, 'enrichment' connotes a very
American sense of self-reliance, industriousness and understanding of
what Albert Einstein allegedly called 'the most powerful force in the
universe': compound interest.

Here's what we think can and should happen in some sort of logical framework going forward:

We should move to a pure consumption tax nationwide to fund the
federal government. (States can do whatever they like in accordance
with the states' rights intentions of the Founders)

The consumption tax should be enough to only cover the following
parts of the current federal budget: Defense. Discretionary social
programs. Interest on the national debt. About 47% of the current $3.7
trillion budget. Or about 12.5% of current GDP

That would mean that a national consumption tax on every purchase,
excluding food bought at a grocery store, would be subject to
approximately a 12.5 % consumption tax at point of purchase or signing
of contract. (Yes, homes and cars would be included since they represent
'consumption' of the use of steel and wood and plastic for the most
part in order to get shelter and mobility)

'Hey! Wait a minute! What about my Social Security and Medicare
benefits? I paid into those programs you know with my hard-earned
money!'

That you did, my friend, that you did. Except it went into the pockets
of people who long-ago retired and have now since died. Your current
payroll taxes are now being paid into the bankrupt (literally) SS and
Medicare programs that can not even meet the costs and demands of the
current retiree generation.

How in the heck do you think you are paying into a private fund that
will provide any benefits for you down the road? If you believe that,
then you have most certainly been lied to and cheated by politicians for
decades now.

There is a solution. It will take a lot of guts and a lot of nerve to
propose, advocate and then pass into legislation. But it will lead to
an 'Enrichment Society'
unlike the world has ever known. It will make every past recipient of
Social Security and Medicare green with envy that FDR and LBJ didn't
think far enough ahead in time to do this for them...and their
families...and their children's children.

You will notice that we have deliberately limited the 12.5% consumption
tax to only cover defense, discretionary items and interest on the
national debt. Most people we know would pay a 12.5% federal tax today
in a split second and go home screaming with delight and joy to the
world.

The rest of what you currently pay in payroll taxes for SS and Medicare
would be converted into tax-deferred savings plan that can be used for
future retirement and medical needs when you retire. The entire amount.
7.85% of your salary plus the employer match of 7.85% if you work for
someone, 15.7% if you are self-employed. All of it.

Where would this be?

Well, if we are smart about it, it would be directed to the nation's
financial services sector to manage along with the current trillions of
dollars now under management in current IRA and 401k plans. It could
still have the guarantee of the federal government to provide a floor
for benefits for anyone who retires during an economic downturn such as
the one that started in 2008 and just doesn't seem to want to go away.

We already have the case of Chile which has moved to such an
'enrichment' society in 1980. Most of the top-ranked nations ahead of
the US in terms of retirement all have a large component of their
national retirement programs in some form of self-directed,
individualized IRA or 401k model.

Today, we have nothing of the kind as part of our Social Security
structure. Nada. Nothing. The blind adherence by many in the
Democratic Party today to the 86-year old format of the current SS
system is preventing you from retiring with far greater wealth and
security than you will ever get from SS in its current form.

Would you buy a used 1935 Packard today and expect it to perform as well
as a 2013 Nissan for example? Doubt it very much. But that is what we
are doing by relying on the old SS/Medicare format instead of moving to a
more modern version that will yield far more in benefits than a measly
monthly stipend of about $1700 can ever afford anyone.

On top of that, part of the current payroll funds could be invested into
a 'health savings account' starting at age 18 when people start to
work. Once again, through the miracle of compound interest, each person
would have more than enough to pay for high-end catastrophic health
coverage for the bulk of their lives; long-term health care insurance
and basic medical coverage once they retire.

Huge amounts of resources are spent in the last year of life,
predominately for the roughly 5% of Medicare patients who pass away each
year. These could be covered by the institution of these new health
savings plans as long as they are instituted at the beginning of a
person's work life, not at the end of it.

These are not pipe-dreams or pie-in-the-sky musings by a crazy person
(we hope). We have the technology and financial instruments now in
place in America to set up a retirement plan for every citizen such that
when any person, rich or poor alike, reaches their golden retirement
age, he/she can provide for their own needs and take this burden off of a
centralized government in Washington that currently can not meet the
demand and is bankrupting our country as we speak.

As an added golden egg bonus, if you happen to be one of the millions of
people who will die suddenly of a heart attack, stroke or accident at
any age, all of the money
in these tax-deferred savings accounts can and should be willed to your
spouse and family so they can use them for their purposes later.
Today, if you die of a heart attack 1 minute before you become eligible
for SS or Medicare, you get nothing back from all of that money you complain about putting into the system in the first place.

Imagine that. An 'Enrichment Society' where each successive generation leaves the next generation better off.

Instead of the opposite as we are doing today. Bankruptcy and despair.

Which will you choose?

3 comments:

I wouldn't mind if, in addition to this, the federal government assumed new debt to pre-fund the accounts of people currently "entitled" to social security and medicare benefits with the nominal accumulated amounts to-date for each. Yes, it would be an enormous expansion of national debt, on the order of $35 trillion or so (maybe more). On the other hand, printing money seems to mean very little at the moment, it is already an implied obligation, and it would do a lot to mollify the people who have been working for a while. The additional debt would be "worth it" for the conversion, in my opinion.

@ Nick - I also would be willing to incur new debt for this very program - but it has to be UNTOUCHABLE: No court, bankruptcy, fine, child support, or liens could touch it.

@ Frank - actually we had a lady come by who laid out a plan to our Soldiers (I am in the Army) wherein a Soldier saves $16000 by age 26 would have 2.5 million dollars by the time they retire. Now, that's not taking into account inflation. But, also, starting 26 years earlier (your idea) by the time that 10k had 26 years to mature, would, at only 5% interest, be 35,556.73 (compound interest calulator, lol). So, by 65, it would be like 4 million dollars (not taking into account inflation loss).

So - $10k plus what is saved from the age of 18 to 65 - holy freaking crap - EVERYONE would retire rich.

"When compiling sharp conservative thoughts and takes for my Morning Jolt newsletter late at night and early in the morning, I find myself coming back to Left Coast Rebel again and again." -Jim Geraghty, National Review"Hey Tim, I appreciate the kind email and the plug on your site. It’s rare that my first feedback isn’t hate mail from a disgruntled statist! You carry on too – we’ve got our work cut out for us." -Tad DeHaven, Cato Institute"Thanks so much for all YOU do for liberty and individual rights. I appreciate your strong voice for capitalism. We're changing the culture -- keep it up!" -Jonathan Hoenig, Fox News"Congrats Tim. You have arrived." -GatewayPundit"Before we sell California to China or go Lex Luther on the San Andreas Fault, let's be sure to save the Left Coast Rebel." -Barack Obama's Cousin, Milton R. Wolf, M.D.

"I like LCR because it seems like more thought goes into posts there than at many other blogs that focus more on horse-race politics." -Nate Nelson, United Liberty

Legal Ease

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
The opinions expressed are those of the respected authors alone. Any material posted here is made available for educational and informative purposes, and as such constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C., section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The material on this blog is provided without profit for benign research and educational purposes.