If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

Originally Posted by Captain Beeflat

....clarinbass.
Clearly you never worked in the Aircraft Industry.
To advocate, or even justify, a less than necessary system which adds cost, weight & could give problems would be deemed obscene......

That's comparing apples to oranges.
It would probably cost even more to produce a saxophone without the F# trill key because they would need to change the tooling and aerodynamics are irrelevant.

You'll find that most saxophone techs haven't worked in the aircraft industry, it's not exactly a prerequisite.

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

This thread indicates that the F# trill key is not necessary for some people, but it is necessary for many others.

Some people apparently believe that flipping fingers is "good enough." Just like some people find the sound they get from synthetic reeds to be "good enough." That's fine for them, but, try as they might, they're not going to convince too many other people of it. Many people believe that "good enough" is not good enough if you can do better.

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

Originally Posted by daigle65

You'll find that most saxophone techs haven't worked in the aircraft industry, it's not exactly a prerequisite.

Only then would they understand the importance of excess weight, complexity, cost, & total reliability.
When you can make a weightless, ever reliable, f# trill key & guard which costs nothing in terms of material & time....then fit it at no extra cost, just let me know.

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

You're still comparing apples and oranges.
Weight is an important factor in the aircraft industry but it's irrelevant for saxophones.
Think of the extra keys that have been added on over the years (high F#, G on some sopranos, tilting spatulas), the extra key guards, the double arms. All of this adds extra weight but it doesn't take away from performance.

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

Originally Posted by daigle65

You're still comparing apples and oranges.
Weight is an important factor in the aircraft industry but it's irrelevant for saxophones.
Think of the extra keys that have been added on over the years (high F#, G on some sopranos, tilting spatulas), the extra key guards, the double arms. All of this adds extra weight but it doesn't take away from performance.

Do forgive me, but weight is an important area in any area of production.....you are confusing marketing gimmicks with what is necessary.

Your earlier point concerning the tooling costs in leaving out the F# trill key is also flawed.
Were the sax a casting or a moulding you would, to a degree, have a valid point.
The saxophone, however, is fabricated....all the operations being carried out on jigs....to leave out one of these operations would, therefore, be no problem, & save both time & costs.

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

Originally Posted by Captain Beeflat

My teacher, all those years ago, maintained that the first rule of fingering was to keep your fingers in close contact with the main keys....an unequivocal rule.
Pete Thomas' in his spoof advert, advertises Sax-O-Glue...."No more finger-lifting blues to slow you down". This would not be amusing were it not true.Both F and F# are available, under your fingers in the main stack....learn to use them, just as pianists & trumpeters have....oh how they would laugh at the "need" for an extra key.

Keyboard players need only to learn to play in C....the transposing button takes care of the rest!....similar philosophy.

Personally, like Jaws, I use only the main stacks, avoiding even aux F and the side keys, this to avoid unnecessary finger lifting. All the notes, including altissimo are available without removing one's fingers from the main stacks.....Bb is either bis, or 1&1.....Keep it Simple, an infallible rule.
Hands up anyone who would use the F# trill during a lightning fast chromatic scale from D to D.

clarinbass.
Clearly you never worked in the Aircraft Industry.
To advocate, or even justify, a less than necessary system which adds cost, weight & could give problems would be deemed obscene.
Remember the old adage "If a butterfly lands on a bridge, the bridge bends".

Anytime I have a chromatic line with F and F# I use the 'trill' key. That's when it's most useful!

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

Originally Posted by Captain Beeflat

warp x
Just keep practising as you seem so fond of trills.

I'm not fond of trills. Where did I say so?
You're saying you don't need the key. I'm curious to hear you play a trill without it. If you can't do it that would mean that key could be useful, even for you. No need to get smart.

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

Originally Posted by Pete Thomas

Spoof! What spoof?

Grovelling apologies....I took it to be a joke.
Perhaps therefore, as you claim it to be serious, Mr. Happy should mention in the instructions that, under no circumstances should this product be applied to the D finger, which must, at all times, be free to grope across, just occasionally, for an out of line key.

Re: Is the F# trill key necessary?

Originally Posted by Buck Laughlin

Just like some people find the sound they get from synthetic reeds to be "good enough." That's fine for them, but, try as they might, they're not going to convince too many other people of it. Many people believe that "good enough" is not good enough if you can do better.

One cannot fail to be impressed with your modesty.
At every opportunity you are sufficiently self effacing to admit to your inability to play synthetic reeds. What is this sound that you seek?...one wonders if you are perhaps confusing the saxophone sound with that of a banjo.
Many of us...including Pete Thomas, achieve a good sax sound from synthetics. I would be grateful if you could explain just what, exactly, is wrong with Pete Thomas' sound.