Miner works currently via RPCv1, available on test-port 8001 on erebor.dwarfpool.comI have integrated djm's cpu-miner to compare hash, so, debuggers can see it in logs as "DIFFERENT_HASH" if OpenCL gives wrong hash.

In "cryptonight.cl_withaes_noworking" I have added AES implementation from djm. But with some errors."cryptonight.cl" == "cryptonight.cl_withkeccak_noaes" does not have AES therefore bad hashes.

So, if anybody can check and make normal "cryptonight.cl", you can use test port 8001.

Miner works currently via RPCv1, available on test-port 8001 on erebor.dwarfpool.comI have integrated djm's cpu-miner to compare hash, so, debuggers can see it in logs as "DIFFERENT_HASH" if OpenCL gives wrong hash.

In "cryptonight.cl_withaes_noworking" I have added AES implementation from djm. But with some errors."cryptonight.cl" == "cryptonight.cl_withkeccak_noaes" does not have AES therefore bad hashes.

So, if anybody can check and make normal "cryptonight.cl", you can use test port 8001.

Awesome, I have a CL file, but no good host! If we put it together, we might get something.

How? It's absurdly expensive, and at first (naive) testing, appears to be similar to the 750ti, plus or minus a bit. Ok, you save pci-e slots. That's good. But the ratios of hash vs power draw are nothing new.. now maybe that changes as developers start really optimizing for the cards.. but I don't think we're going to see massive improvement when the first pass was basically this good.

No matter what settings i try the card is barely warm with 60c and 30% cooler. Its not used to full. Hash is 530 with 8x128 (best ive gotten)Tsiv, any ideas? It should get at least 3x 750ti perf @1000hash