From: "Sean McMahon" <smcmahon@xxxxxxxx>

To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:25:48 -0700

I think legal battles do affect us as customers. As an investor, which is
assentially what a customer is, you have a right to say what you feel about what
the company is doing. If a company is focusing on suits, they have less money
for r&d which may affect the products we receive. We have a right to say
anything. Maybe it's ignorent, maybe it's dammaging, but it is that right which
encourages competition, shares ideas and makes us realize our diversity.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Grimsby Jr." <jimgrims@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Not really. This is a business like any other. You and I have no right to
try to ask any one how to run there company accept how it effects us as
customers of said company. So if you were publishing a on line petition
to get freedom scientific to start a jaws payment plan I would go right
over there and sign it. Now that is our business. Note no one asked
Microsoft to stop sewing linspier over the name they used to have for
there program. No one asked apple core not to sew apple computers. What
about the i-phone situation. Think about it.
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Darrell Shandrow
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:20 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FreedomScientific, Inc. Asked to Cease Lawsuit Against Serotek
Corporation
Hello Adrian,
It is most certainly our business as a blind community if it turns out that
some innovative technologies end up being squelched over this.
Darrell Shandrow - Accessibility Evangelist
Visit http://www.SaveSerotek.org and ask Freedom Scientific to stop suing!
Information should be accessible to us without need of translation by
another person.
Blind Access Journal blog and podcast: http://www.blindaccessjournal.com
Check out high quality telecommunications services at http://ld.net/?nu7i

To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: FreedomScientific, Inc. Asked to Cease Lawsuit Against Serotek
Corporation
Hi, Darrell.
This flurry of messages has led me to take advantage of Benjamin's link to
the legal complaint that FS filed in federal court. I'm not sure why your
friend thinks the case has little legal merit. It's a highly professional
document that states the case well. That doesn't mean FS will win. It does
mean, however, that all our commentary looks naive by contrast.
I would very much like to know how Serotek justifies its use of "Freedom."
Benjamin has just written a note analyzing the exact products that Serotek
offers, to the extent one can make them out. But in the larger world, FS
seems correct in its legal complaint in asserting that its reputation lies
more generally with products for the blind and visually impaired. In that
context FS has made a case that use of "Freedom" could be confusing. It
remains for Serotek to prove otherwise.
I admire your public spirit. However, it is disingenuous to say that all
you're doing is asking FS to abandon its lawsuit. If Bruce is correct in
asserting that FS tried to resolve the problem before filing this lawsuit,
which I emphasize is an "if," I wonder why Serotek was so adamant in
clinging to the "Freedom" name. Just dropping it would have avoided this
situation, which you say you want to bring to an end. Instead, it seems to
me that Serotek, rightly or wrongly, has made the decision to fight. I have
to conclude that the lawsuit is a private matter and none of our business.
Like you, I hope it doesn't result in the loss of a supplier of adaptive
equipment. However, it's time for us to take a back seat. Actually, we're
already sitting there.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darrell Shandrow" <nu7i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello Dean,
Our only point with the petition is to allow the blind community to make a
statement that they feel the lawsuit should be stopped. One of my legal
sources believes, on first blush, that this actually does not look like a
very strong case.
Darrell Shandrow - Accessibility Evangelist Visit http://www.SaveSerotek.org
and ask Freedom Scientific to stop suing! Information should be accessible
to us without need of translation by another person. Blind Access Journal
blog and podcast: http://www.blindaccessjournal.com Check out high quality
telecommunications services at http://ld.net/?nu7i
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 - Release Date: 5/21/2007
2:01 PM
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/