Why Voters Should Never, Ever, Vote for the Conservative, Labour or Lib Dem Parties Ever Again

Introduction

The report on Tony Blair’s claim that productivity in the UK has fallen since Brexit hours before new data revealed productivity growth has, in fact, hit a six-year high is typical of the lies and deceit by the Europhiles. It was not long ago that Nick Clegg vehemently said during his televised debate with Nigel Farage, that the EU was forming an army was a dangerous fallacy. This was an outrageous lie to the British public, yet he is being “rewarded” with a knighthood! (I hope most sincerely millions more people will sign the petition demanding that that he not be knighted.) Conservative Communities Secretary Sajid Javid has claimed the proportion of household growth in England down to immigration is 37 per cent. But Migration Watch says that according to the Labour Force Survey by the Office for National Statistics, 1.65 million of the 2 million new households (82%) needing homes in England between 2000-2015 were headed by someone who was an immigrant. In a stinging attack, Migration Watch UK said it was “entirely false and misleading” to suggest two-thirds of housing demand is the result of natural population growth.

Significantly, despite these obvious lies NO apologies are ever made public and none of the three political parties or their politicians publicly corrects them. They are all in it together. In fact, they are all following the deliberate lie about the UK’s loss of sovereignty by Ted Heath, Conservative prime minister in 1972. This lie was re-enforced and compounded by Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson when he instigated the EEC referendum in 1975 on the basis that the UK had simply joined a trading bloc.

The cover-up

It is abundantly clear that the Conservative, Labour and Lim Dem parties have been following to the letter the advice given to them in the 1972 FCO paper FCO30/1048. This paper, which remained locked away for 30 years, advised the British Government to:

Cover-up the realities of EU membership so that by the time the public realised what was happening it would be too late (my emphasis).

So for over 45 years all three parties have clearly lied and deceived the British public as to their true intentions with regard to EU membership which was:

To destroy the United Kingdom as a sovereign nation and make it part of a supra-national European country. In the process the British public would effectively be dis-enfranchised, be made liable for horrendous costs to sustain the project and we would lose our nationality.

Think about that for a while!

It is absolutely devastating that three of our main political parties and their elected politicians have not only deceived the British public as to their true intentions for being in the EU, which was to destroy our nation, but incredulously, all three parties have consistently and deliberately maintained this deceit for over 45 years, and they are all still doing it!

Current examples

3.1. The Labour and Lib Dem Parties and many politicians in the Conservative Party advocate staying in the EU’s customs union. WHY? It costs every household up to £1,000 extra/year.

The EU’s customs union is costing the average UK household up to an extra £1,000 per year. This must hurt poorer households, the Labour Party’s traditional support base, the most. Why do they not tell their members and the voters that they are making them pay more and for what benefit or purpose?

3.2. The Labour and Lib Dem parties and politicians in the Conservative Party advocate staying in the EU’s single market. WHY? It has already cost us well over £1 trillion.

After trading with the EEC/EU since 1973, the current accumulated balance of trade is a DEFICIT (loss) of well over £1 trillion. So trading with the EEC/EU has already cost us over £1 trillion. Conversely, since 1973 the current accumulated balance of trade with the rest of the world, using WTO rules, is a surplus (profit) of well over £200 billion.

Membership of the single market also entails free movement of people which inevitably costs the UK a fortune in money and puts a severe strain on all UK services such as the NHS, transport, housing etc and it is the UK citizen who inevitably loses out to the immigrants from the EU. The additional cost, 0.2% GDP, of supporting unskilled immigration from the EU due to free movement needs to be added to the £1 trillion total cost of being in the single market, as does the vastly increased costs of the pressures on the infrastructure and services due to increased population growth due to uncontrolled immigration from the EU. This figure has not apparently been calculated by the government and is not therefore publicised officially.

Every country in the world already has access to the single market with the EU. The USA and China are massive exporters to the single market without the facility of having a trade deal with the EU yet neither is bound to accept free movement of people or membership of the customs union. In addition, neither country has to bear the horrendous overhead cost of EU membership, currently estimated to be £185 billion/annum.

6 Comments

John Locke
on January 11, 2018 at 6:27 am

May be a political party needs to come along and point this out to the public? Oh wait…

Jerry Wraith
on January 10, 2018 at 9:45 pm

Jake, the first sentence is the summary of the document published in the Daily Express article printed on Fri Nov 24th 2017. The second part of your comment is the end result of the aims of the EU and is what was apparently always intended by the EEC/EU. By staying in the EU that is also the end result for the United Kingdom.

Tony Woodcock
on January 10, 2018 at 5:30 pm

ChrisK, I think you have said a mouthful ” Something’s GOT to change, or else we are stuffed”
Problem: at the next GE we shall, once again, have two discredited parties who will manipulate the agenda to avoid awkward subjects like the ones in Jeremy Wraith’s aerticle. So how do we dislodge an immovable establisment in government and the deep state supporting it?
It seems to me we can only go round it by putting the people back in charge. This means JRE’s notion of increased direct democracy: more info and debate on big issues before parliament, public debate NOT manipulated by party whips and slavishly reported by MSM to follow the establishment group-think, more referendums.
For this we need a new party determined to destroy our fake democracy and bring in a more creditable format.
Won’t be UKIP I fear.

Jake Bennett
on January 10, 2018 at 4:16 pm

Yes, the document exists that Heath knew the effects on our sovereignty but I have never seen the highlighted section you give us. Or is this just your personal inference of what the document states?
I cannot find the following in the FCO document that you give us;

Cover-up the realities of EU membership so that by the time the public realised what was happening it would be too late (my emphasis) and;
To destroy the United Kingdom as a sovereign nation and make it part of a supra-national European country. In the process the British public would effectively be dis-enfranchised, be made liable for horrendous costs to sustain the project and we would lose our nationality.

forthurst
on January 10, 2018 at 8:23 pm

For one thing, the original document refers to European Communities not the European Union which was only hinted at in the treaty of Rome “Ever closer union among the peoples of Europe”. This article needs to be pulled.

ChrisK
on January 10, 2018 at 1:35 pm

45 years ago we had no Internet, to help us seek out information rapidly. 1975 referendum voters (including myself) could only make a judgement based on what we could read in the papers and hear on TV (which of course we assumed, in general, was reasonably truthful). Yes, we got it wrong….which is why we tramped the streets in 2016 with “Out” leaflets, to make amends. Since 2009 I’ve voted UKIP, or spoiled my ballot when a UKIP candidate wasn’t available. Something’s GOT to change, or else we’re stuffed.

Search

Search for:

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Please leave this field empty

Email *

Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all the latest from Independence Daily in your inbox.