Brian Wilson: SNP arrogance is no mere frippery

BRIAN WILSON

Expenses row is another reminder of Nationalist contempt for transparency in government, writes Brian Wilson

I can understand why Alex Salmond considers it a “ridiculous frippery” to be asked how an unexplained £54,000 of taxpayers’ money was spent. But he should be careful about assuming that the court of public opinion shares his contempt for the question.

Politicians get used to thinking in terms of other people’s millions. Some new initiative is hardly worth announcing without a seven-figure price tag to validate its significance, whatever the ultimate worth. The Scottish Government has more than £30 billion to dispense, even in what is supposed to be a lean year.

Within that mindset, £54,000 is small change. But both the law and the voters have an irritating habit of not seeing it that way. Many find it difficult to relate to the big numbers, but a figure that is twice the average national wage is well within the bounds of comprehension – and few can afford to dismiss it as “a ridiculous frippery”. A former first minister, Henry McLeish, was defrocked over a £36,000 “muddle not a fiddle”. Denis McShane, reared in the louche school of journalistic expense claims, is doing six months in the slammer over £15,000, even though the judge acknowledged that no personal gain was involved.

The smaller the sum, it seems, the higher the expectation of honest accounting. Should a lower level of accountability apply to the excursions of ministers, with an army of civil servants employed to keep them right, than to the foibles of individual parliamentarians? That is a question that might usefully be put to the test if this nonsense continues.

I do not belong to the hairshirt brigade and I believe that politicians who are representing their country abroad should do so with some style. Indeed, I recall sympathising with the irritation of Scottish Development International officials in San Francisco when Donald Dewar spent much of his time complaining about the expense of the hotel into which he had been booked. But the belief that Salmond decamped from his appointed billet in order to bask in a more luxurious one goes to the other extreme.

The fact that Justin Bieber has lodged in a particular hotel should not of itself deter the First Minister of Scotland from doing so, though neither would I regard his patronage as an incentive to share the experience. The sole test is whether the costs incurred are defensible and the only way to judge that is with knowledge of the costs and reasons. As simple as that.

Underlying this “frippery” is a more fundamental problem – the Scottish Government’s total and utter contempt for Freedom of Information, either as a principle or in its legislative form. It repeatedly obstructs perfectly reasonable requests for information on the solitary grounds that it would prefer not to give it. This is an expression of arrogance that should be called to account.

The £500,000 costs involved in the Chicago trip do appear to border on a folie de grandeur. But this might be long forgotten if it were not for the ruthless determination of someone within the Scottish Government to prevent disclosure of what the money was spent on. Eventually, VisitScotland coughed up the information about its share, which amounted to £415,000, leaving £54,000 unaccounted for.

Last Friday, following the exchanges at First Minister’s Question Time, the Scottish Government released some of the elusive information at 6:40pm. This was 15 months after the expenses were incurred and three months after the specific FoI request was lodged by the Daily Telegraph. There is only one reason for releasing information at such a time and that is to minimise the reporting of it.

Even now, the breakdown of costs is deliberately vague and the hotel details are completely missing.

For good measure, the total has been “revised down” by £3,000, which, after 15 months, suggests that this amount has been repaid following a long and reluctant interval. The sum of £37,500 is attributed to “travel” which, when added to the VisitScotland figures, suggests that it cost over £90,000 in fares alone to fly the whole circus to Chicago. If true, that really is excessive.

The Freedom of Information Commissioner, Rosemary Agnew, has repeatedly made her displeasure known about the Scottish Government’s treatment of FoI requests. These have covered everything from the infamous attempt to conceal the absence of legal advice on European Union membership right down to the cost of furnishing Mr Salmond with tartan trews in China – a tit-bit that took seven months to elicit through the FoI process.

Invariably, the reason for refusing information is to avoid political inconvenience. Apart from the EU fiasco, one of the best examples was the government’s protracted effort to keep secret the advice of its own Fiscal Commission, which had advised that an oil fund could only have been paid from “reduced public spending, increased taxation or increased public sector borrowing”.

It is not difficult to see why the Nationalists would want to keep this kind of advice secret, but defying the letter and spirt of Freedom of Information legislation in order to do so should not be an option at their disposal. Their objective now will be to kick everything they don’t want to come out into touch until after the referendum – and the Information Commissioner has a duty to stop that happening.

The Chicago trip would be a good place to start cracking the whip. Nobody who knows the civil service believes for one moment that the information about how the money was spent is not available, down to the last dime – unless, of course, that information has been disposed of in the interim, which would be a offence after an FoI request has been lodged. So, let’s have a forensic review of how that money can be accounted for – and if it can’t, the law should take its course.

The information should have been provided when it was first asked for. There may well be no whiff of scandal in how the money was spent in this or other outstanding instances. But there is undoubtedly a scandal in the habitual efforts of the Scottish Government to conceal from taxpayers the information to which the law entitles them and which clearly involves matter of legitimate public interest.

This is no “ridiculous frippery” and if Salmond really thinks it is, he and his entourage need a sharp reminder that if they can’t defend it, they shouldn’t spend it. That is a rule of political integrity and transparency, which applies to £54,000 as much as to £54 million.

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice.
If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the
Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the IPSO by
clicking here.

The Scotsman provides news, events and sport features from the Edinburgh area. For the best up to date information relating to Edinburgh and the surrounding areas visit us at The Scotsman regularly or bookmark this page.

For you to enjoy all the features of this website The Scotsman requires permission to use cookies.

Find Out More ▼

What is a Cookie?

What is a Flash Cookie?

Can I opt out of receiving Cookies?

About our Cookies

Cookies are small data files which are sent to your browser (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome etc) from a website you visit. They are stored on your electronic device.

This is a type of cookie which is collected by Adobe Flash media player (it is also called a Local Shared Object) - a piece of software you may already have on your electronic device to help you watch online videos and listen to podcasts.

Yes there are a number of options available, you can set your browser either to reject all cookies, to allow only "trusted" sites to set them, or to only accept them from the site you are currently on.

However, please note - if you block/delete all cookies, some features of our websites, such as remembering your login details, or the site branding for your local newspaper may not function as a result.

The types of cookies we, our ad network and technology partners use are listed below:

Revenue Science ►

A tool used by some of our advertisers to target adverts to you based on pages you have visited in the past. To opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

Google Ads ►

Our sites contain advertising from Google; these use cookies to ensure you get adverts relevant to you. You can tailor the type of ads you receive by visiting here or to opt out of this type of targeting you can visit the 'Your Online Choices' website by clicking here.

Digital Analytics ►

This is used to help us identify unique visitors to our websites. This data is anonymous and we cannot use this to uniquely identify individuals and their usage of the sites.

Dart for Publishers ►

This comes from our ad serving technology and is used to track how many times you have seen a particular ad on our sites, so that you don't just see one advert but an even spread. This information is not used by us for any other type of audience recording or monitoring.

ComScore ►

ComScore monitor and externally verify our site traffic data for use within the advertising industry. Any data collected is anonymous statistical data and cannot be traced back to an individual.

Local Targeting ►

Our Classified websites (Photos, Motors, Jobs and Property Today) use cookies to ensure you get the correct local newspaper branding and content when you visit them. These cookies store no personally identifiable information.

Grapeshot ►

We use Grapeshot as a contextual targeting technology, allowing us to create custom groups of stories outside out of our usual site navigation. Grapeshot stores the categories of story you have been exposed to. Their privacy policy and opt out option can be accessed here.

Subscriptions Online ►

Our partner for Newspaper subscriptions online stores data from the forms you complete in these to increase the usability of the site and enhance user experience.

Add This ►

Add This provides the social networking widget found in many of our pages. This widget gives you the tools to bookmark our websites, blog, share, tweet and email our content to a friend.