Wouldn’t
you love it if Obama and Romney would actually address the accelerating
problems facing our country and give reasonable answers—and then
actually take action once they reached the White House? Instead, moderators
like Jim Lehrer asked ridiculous questions that avoid the nitty-gritty
of our nation’s woes.

I’m
willing to bet that if Romney or Obama would give this speech, the citizens
of America would vote them into the presidency in a landslide. If one
of those men would implement the principles, policies and practices
both here in the USA and overseas, we would gladly elect them.

If
one of them said, “Since we have wasted 10 years in Iraq and 11
years in Afghanistan and $800 billion, and we have killed over 4,000
of our finest young men and women, and we have accomplished nothing
whatsoever to stop terrorists in all that time, I will pull out of those
countries 100 percent upon my first day in office. I will take the words
of President Thomas Jefferson, “The United States must avoid foreign
entanglements.” We don’t need 552,000 military personnel
on 700 bases around the world when we need our own country’s borders
guarded. The military waste can no longer be continued. I will bring
them back home.”

If
one of them said, “We can no longer survive in excess of 20 million
illegal alien migrants in our lands. I will strictly enforce internally
our present immigration laws as to hiring, transport and housing of
illegal migrants. I will create attrition through enforcement. If anyone
jumps our borders, he or she will be fingerprinted, photographed and
sent home. If caught again, they face 10 years in prison with no hope
of parole. The buck stops with me. As to legal immigration, the current
1.2 million annual legal immigration numbers are too high, take jobs
from Americans and overload our country as to environment, schools and
welfare. I will work to reduce all immigration to less than 100,000
per year. We can help other countries with their people in their own
lands. We cannot afford to be the final destination for endless immigration.
Additionally, we only allow immigrants that benefit our country and
speak our language and do not use our welfare system and are compatible
with our culture and way of life. We will no longer invite people with
incompatible religions and cultures into our country. It is counterproductive
for them and us. ”

If
one of them said, “As to Muslims and the Middle East, we will
no longer fund Pakistan, Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan or any other country.
We need to allow them to settle their own differences. No more bloodshed
of our own young men and women. We will not financially support any
more governments in the Middle East or any other countries around the
world. As to travel, because all terrorist activities have been young
Muslim men, we will profile all Middle Eastern men who might travel
to our country as a way to discourage violence to our citizens.”

If
one of the candidates said, “Since we import billions of dollars
of manufactured goods into the USA through free trade that has caused
a $1.3 trillion debt to China, I will create “fair trade”
so that China buys $10 billion in goods from us and we buy $10 billion
from them. This will benefit our workers by creating manufacturing jobs
in our country to support our citizens instead of citizens of China.
It would also stop the trade deficits we face from unequal trade.”

If
one candidate said, “To stop drugs from coming into America, I
am taking 28 thousand troops out of Korea and place them on our Mexican
border. That would stop drug trafficking within 30 days to a trickle.
It would stop illegal immigration quicker than the Navy Seals who took
out bin Laden. If needed, I would take the 140,000 troops in Afghanistan
and put them on the Canadian border. I will use common sense and rational
action to enforce our borders.”

If
one of them said, “I will work for American citizens and communities
to bring back the finest jobs that will promote the finest schools and
deliver the finest rebuilding of infrastructure within the United States.
I will work for American citizens to better their lives and the lives
of our youth. I will change the 46.9 million Americans living on food
stamps by introducing workfare/education-fare for welfare. I will make
educating our minorities and personal responsibility and accountability
the mainstay of our nation. I will fund it by bringing home most of
our military personnel on those 700 bases and those useless wars.”

Subscribe
to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter
Your E-Mail Address:

Obviously,
these common sense solutions would get the next president elected in
a heartbeat. We need a national conservation of energy bill to accent
energy conservation. We need massive alternative energy research. We
need water conservation. We need to force welfare people off the “easy
street” rolls and onto jobs that enhance their lives by being
responsible and contributing to our society. We
don’t need what this lady espouses in this video.

We
need a president who talks straight, is an All-American president, one
who doesn’t hide his past and supports the American way of life
100 percent with all his mind, heart and soul. If one of the candidates
gives this speech, he would win hands down.

Listen
to Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesdays as he interviews
top national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots"
at www.themicroeffect.com
at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your time zone.

Frosty
Wooldridge possesses a unique view of the world, cultures and families
in that he has bicycled around the globe 100,000 miles, on six continents
and six times across the United States in the past 30 years. His published
books include: "HANDBOOK FOR TOURING BICYCLISTS"; �STRIKE THREE! TAKE
YOUR BASE�; �IMMIGRATION�S UNARMED INVASION: DEADLY CONSEQUENCES�; �MOTORCYCLE
ADVENTURE TO ALASKA: INTO THE WIND�A TEEN NOVEL�; �BICYCLING AROUND
THE WORLD: TIRE TRACKS FOR YOUR IMAGINATION�; �AN EXTREME ENCOUNTER:
ANTARCTICA.� His next book: �TILTING THE STATUE OF LIBERTY INTO A SWAMP.�
He lives in Denver, Colorado.