I'm not quite sure what to do with the first one, the second one 9-5-12-17-15-13-13. I'm thinking offensive with the low CN but not a lunger with 15 WL, SL maybe??

_________________All Jacked Up 21, 30
Dankrupt 32

Street_LegalArchMaster Poster

Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Posts: 3516
Location: The Big D (etroit) area

Posted:
Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:32 am

jack wrote:

I'm not quite sure what to do with the first one, the second one 9-5-12-17-15-13-13. I'm thinking offensive with the low CN but not a lunger with 15 WL, SL maybe??

I'll be the first to take a crack at these!

5-13-7-12-9-11-13 -----> 11-13-7-17-9-14-13 ST(9/11/6/1/6/11) /PS(8/11/6/4/6/9). I just hate to waste 6 points just to get to 15 WL and be forced to leave ST at 8 with a SZ 7. That's just begging for little damage!

I definitely lean towards ST, I love the 11 DEC and 6 ATT is not all that horrid for arena play, but I toss in PS since they can be bonused in all areas you could possibly be 10 ATT and/or 13DEC!

5-13-7-12-9-11-13 -----> 9-18-7-17-9-11-13 O-TP(7/9/4/8/6/5).Little damage, about 25-30% chance, would hurt but not horribly and you get a small shot at Good Damage (10%ish). You get a chance to see +3/4 ATT if he gets an ATT statement, which would be sweet, and it's just shy of taking Tremendous Damage. You could take 2 from CN and put it in DF for the skills plus the EP suited, and still take a lot of damage . This guy already has 9 RIP, and I love the EP and it's apparent RIP bonus, so I think it makes a great choice wielded alone, even unsuited by 2 DF!!! You get the SC with an off-hand suited could use the LO or BS slightly unsuited. I really like the possible weapon choices - with or without an off-hand.

I think this guy would be a BLAST to run! Especially with the 17 WT, I've run quite a few 9 WL OTPs to successful records(55%+ on almost all) and most don't have the CN this one has!

Plus I felt bad about suggesting both being a ST. I still lean ST first, the TP second, then the PS, and then if your adventurous you could go:

5-13-7-12-9-11-13 -----> 8-13-7-17-15-11-13 LU (12/9/13/3/9/9) /PL(9/9/11/5/7/. It doesn't seem that great but you look at the numbers and perhaps you gamble for normal damage!

6-5-12-12-10-13-12 -----> 8-5-12-17-16-13-13 ST(9/11/7/2/7/11) I hit WL immediately followed by ST to get the SS and SC suited. I don't fear LO or BS unsuited against 8-12(ASM) armor. I fear the low endurance on your design as a SL simply because it has only a slim shot at Great Damage; the only reason I make a low endurance SL.

_________________A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government.

#1. I like Street Legal's Striker/Offensive and GB's AB.
A 3rd alternative I like is the following hybrid
5-13-7-12-9-11-13 -> 11-15-7-13-15-11-13 (alternatively could shift 2 poitns of con to wit)

#2. I'd definitely go offensive on this one, probably with your second design.

The ConsortiumArchMaster Poster

Joined: Nov 23, 2002
Posts: 9283
Location: on the golf course, in the garden, reading, traveling, and now Consulting

Posted:
Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:12 am

jack wrote:

I'm not quite sure what to do with the first one, the second one 9-5-12-17-15-13-13. I'm thinking offensive with the low CN but not a lunger with 15 WL, SL maybe??

Haven't read anybodu's comments - just a first pass what we would make them for an arena if they were ours:
11-13-7-17-9-14-13 ST
11-6-12-17-10-15-13 ST
strikers are good ............................................