There’s an idea that Buddhists are pacifists, but that’s not quite true, at least not in the way Westerners think of it. In any case the Burmese are smart enough to see that when Moslems get any kind of numbers or power, or the acquiescence of the power structure, they become “wolves or jackals”.

Remember always that Moslems are the Satanic scum of the earth, the mortal enemies of all civilization. Yeah, NAMALT. NABALT either, when they are isolated and weak, it’s all “Yassuh boss!” and big smiles. The façade is discarded as soon as balance of power turns.

Advertisements

Like this:

LikeLoading...

Related

About thrasymachus33308

I like fast cars, fast women and southern-fried rock. I have an ongoing beef with George Orwell. I take my name from a character in Plato's "Republic" who was exasperated with the kind of turgid BS that passed for deep thought and political discourse in that time and place, just as I am today. The character, whose name means "fierce fighter" was based on a real person but nobody knows for sure what his actual political beliefs were. I take my pseudonym from a character in an Adam Sandler song who was a obnoxious jerk who pissed off everybody.

6 Responses to A Tale of Two Countries

Whatever your ideas about the eventual goals of Muslims, the attacks on the Rohingya ethnic group in Burma are certainly not anything of the sort. They have no power and never did. This is not some kind of immigrant foreign population, but the long term inhabitants of the area (for centuries). On top of this, the language of the victim is appropriated, the Burmese are not fighting back against anything, this is the common pattern of such ethnic violence. Some kind of event here or there turns into mass violence, group vs. group with each side proclaiming defense. In this case it is easy to see which side is the aggressor.

As the West crumbles I am sure it is easy to become resentful. We Muslims have our own problems and we are in a very bad way, yet Islam has a proven legacy of civilization and most importantly, maintaining faith through thick and thin. We will survive, though we are far from Islam now. When it comes to Islam, a number of neoreactionary bloggers have no problem swallowing leftism wholesale and applying its twisted morality to Muslims, including victim language.

I would like nothing better than to see a strong, resurgent, Christian West. That is not going to happen with essentially open borders and wholesale importation of the dregs of war-torn nations; traumatized, violent and aimless people. Yet it is not the Muslim world that opens your borders, it is you. If enmity is what you desire then you shall have it. Your nations are pawns of the Jews/Israel, who fan the flames of Islam vs. the West and you play your convenient role. This streak of hatred will consume and destroy you if not checked.

I remember this was when all the really absurd anti-Islamophobic stuff started to be pushed – followed by more hate speech laws, it seemed like such tripe at the time, It didn’t make sense – all western leaders were unanimous in stressing that this was not a conflict geared against Islam which was our ally, and how the reason for all this was that the Muslim world had not yet had its ‘renaissance’. Though we didn’t have the details, a great many other signs were there, but very few nationalists saw it and that is terrible. That is a major intelligence flaw.

Without the benefit of hindsight we find all those supposed inconsistencies and contradictions have purpose.

Islam was the axis on Faye’s judgment and now in one swoop most of the other points are now accounted for. There is no contradiction in allowing Islam into Europe for instance because they are on the globalist side as an occupying force and the policy of genocide against Europeans is back on a sane and rational course. Who cares if there is a collapse after that? It makes long term sense now; what better market is there for a post collapse society than a population of dumb, backwards, immaterial, and religiously obedient dirt people? It’s perfect, but that is market logic; the market doesn’t care about what your skin colour is, only who it can make the biggest buck off of – the point is to strip us till we have nothing to give before moving on to a new consumer base on the flip side.

There is a ‘convergence’, yes, but it is a managed energy flow – Muslims will be the new ‘West’ born untimely ripped out of Europe. The ‘catastrophe’ is for us, planned by our leaders well in advance. A decade long charade has been lifted and you just have to admire the sheer genius of it all.

The goal of Al-Qaeda and co. is to forment strife in Western nations, leading to reprisal. This reprisal will tax the resources of the West (specifically the US) to the point where the internal fractures of their liberal society will cause their destruction. Furthermore the reprisals will lead to resentment amongst Muslims, leading to further strife. Their methods and beliefs are nihilistic, un-Islamic, but they are correct in their estimation. In a global, interconnected world of inhuman scale it is not too hard to envision such a disastrous outcome. Islam is well suited for the pre-modern, perhaps agrarian, conditions that will result. Israel also benefits from strife in the Middle-East, as this is how they intend to survive being outnumbered 100 to 1 by hostile Arabs; Elysium style. Play into their hand more why dont you, lets each of us bring up every atrocity committed by each side ad infinitum until we slit each others throats! Muslims are not your friends or your allies, but they are also not a monolith and not necessarily your enemies.

There is a very easy way to deal with Islam and Judaism. Place both under a Pact of Umar; declare children of White men and Muslim/Jewish women to be White. The reverse is persecuted with extreme prejudice. Islam and Judaism forbid euthanasia. Be creative.