ExpandCollapse

New Member

What constitutes a "personal attack" depends on the politics of the poster. Point out the error of a rightie without ad hominem...personal attack. Call a leftie "Satan"? That's okay. Hope that clears it up. :laugh:

ExpandCollapse

Banned

You can subscribe to the thread or when you post, at the bottom it should allow you to pick and chose whether you get a notice or not. You can set it up in your control panel to automatically pick the option you want as a default.

ExpandCollapse

Active Member

I thought the rule against personal attacks had to do with personal attacks on a poster or member of the BB.

Certainly, public figures are targets for attack. It's always like that. I am not defending all attacks on public figures, but that is not the kind of personal attack we are not supposed to do, unless I'm not remembering the rules.

ExpandCollapse

New Member

You can subscribe to the thread or when you post, at the bottom it should allow you to pick and chose whether you get a notice or not. You can set it up in your control panel to automatically pick the option you want as a default.

ExpandCollapse

<img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

Who kills the babies at D&C's? Who kills the babies in the womb when still born and removed? If life begins at conception. then D&C's are inexcusable too.

There are a host of inconsistencies here. Is God a killer of innocent unborns?

Sorry, I am still confused, and still don't see any real remedies to the seeming problems everyone wants to scream about on every turn. It used to be enjoyable here to discuss issues and even differ amicably.

ExpandCollapse

Banned

I thought the rule against personal attacks had to do with personal attacks on a poster or member of the BB.

Certainly, public figures are targets for attack. It's always like that. I am not defending all attacks on public figures, but that is not the kind of personal attack we are not supposed to do, unless I'm not remembering the rules.

Click to expand...

You are correct and there were no personal attacks towards a member of this board on that thread.

ExpandCollapse

Active Member

Who kills the babies at D&C's? Who kills the babies in the womb when still born and removed? If life begins at conception. then D&C's are inexcusable too.

There are a host of inconsistencies here. Is God a killer of innocent unborns?

Sorry, I am still confused, and still don't see any real remedies to the seeming problems everyone wants to scream about on every turn. It used to be enjoyable here to discuss issues and even differ amicably.

I agree. I've had 9 D&Cs - 2 for pregnancies and 7 for hemorrhaging. In the cases of the hemorrhaging, I would have died had it not been for the D&Cs - AND there were no babies involved. In the 2 D&Cs for pregnancy, the first was after I had already lost the baby (so there was no baby involved again) and the second was after a confirmed fetal death (3 ultrasounds confirmed it) at 10 weeks and the doctor went in and took the baby intact to be able to find out why I had 2 miscarriages in a row. But the baby was absolutely dead before the surgery.

ExpandCollapse

<img src =/Jim1999.jpg>

Yes, and I started the other thread just to say how we, in Canada, appreciated having Mr. Obama, a perfect genteman, in our country, representing America, and how well he did and how we respnded in kiind. Hard to believe it turned into a battle field on abortion, homosexuality and Lord knows what all.

ExpandCollapse

New Member

Yes, and I started the other thread just to say how we, in Canada, appreciated having Mr. Obama, a perfect genteman, in our country, representing America, and how well he did and how we respnded in kiind. Hard to believe it turned into a battle field on abortion, homosexuality and Lord knows what all.

Quick Navigation

Support us!

The management of Baptist Board works very hard to make sure the community is running the best software, best design, and all the other bells and whistles that goes into a forum our size.Your support is much appreciated!