pottie:F-f-f-f-fark, that's a well d-d-d-d-developed f-f-f-f-fifteen year old

Hey, it's child abduction. She can't possibly have been a willing party in this, even though nearly picture of her shows her acting completely at ease with her 'kidnapper', and there's no way at all she would show of her gigantic cleavage in nearly every picture of her, what with her being a minor, legally mentally incapale of making such decisions of her own free will

All I can say is that Megan Stammers is a silly bunt for getting caught so quickly. Wouldn't we all like to be run down in France eventually but not too soon?

Wait a tick. English schoolgirl. Goes missing mysteriously. Found in France. Looks like a high end Emo that got over it in the summer vacation.

Is she by an chance a St. Trinian's gel?

Damn, I love Ronald Searle. Nobody understood little girls better than him, not even Maurice Chevalier. I have many of his books, even those which do not involve a lot of gambling, booze, drugs, sex, violence, mayhem, crime and murder, such as his war time cartoons of trench life.

But he really was one of the great cartoonists on the subjects of cats and women and other beastliness.

Agent Smiths Laugh:Gilligann: A spokeswoman for Sussex Police said the pair were "safe and well" and added: "Arrangements will now be made for Megan and Jeremy's safe return."

The article makes it sound like the abductor is a victim in all this.

Stop. Breathe.

Now.

What makes you think there actually are any victims in this?

But she's a child! A baby. Of course that poor inoccent child is a victim here. Because she's under 18 she can't possibly be held a responsbile for her actions, she had no idea what she was doing. It's almost like she went out to buy skittles and ended up in France with a 30yr old!!

KrustyKitten:Agent Smiths Laugh: Gilligann: A spokeswoman for Sussex Police said the pair were "safe and well" and added: "Arrangements will now be made for Megan and Jeremy's safe return."

The article makes it sound like the abductor is a victim in all this.

Stop. Breathe.

Now.

What makes you think there actually are any victims in this?

But she's a child! A baby. Of course that poor inoccent child is a victim here. Because she's under 18 she can't possibly be held a responsbile for her actions, she had no idea what she was doing. It's almost like she went out to buy skittles and ended up in France with a 30yr old!!

KrustyKitten:Agent Smiths Laugh: Gilligann: A spokeswoman for Sussex Police said the pair were "safe and well" and added: "Arrangements will now be made for Megan and Jeremy's safe return."

The article makes it sound like the abductor is a victim in all this.

Stop. Breathe.

Now.

What makes you think there actually are any victims in this?

But she's a child! A baby. Of course that poor inoccent child is a victim here. Because she's under 18 she can't possibly be held a responsbile for her actions, she had no idea what she was doing. It's almost like she went out to buy skittles and ended up in France with a 30yr old!!

Agent Smiths Laugh:KrustyKitten: Agent Smiths Laugh: Gilligann: A spokeswoman for Sussex Police said the pair were "safe and well" and added: "Arrangements will now be made for Megan and Jeremy's safe return."

The article makes it sound like the abductor is a victim in all this.

Stop. Breathe.

Now.

What makes you think there actually are any victims in this?

But she's a child! A baby. Of course that poor inoccent child is a victim here. Because she's under 18 she can't possibly be held a responsbile for her actions, she had no idea what she was doing. It's almost like she went out to buy skittles and ended up in France with a 30yr old!!

/he was her teacher tho, that makes it a bit more farked up :(

Not really. It's just one more subjective standard.

In the UK you are in deep trouble if you are in a position of authority and sleep with someone under 18 in your control.

16 is standard age of consent.

Live with it.

If you make the decision to be a teacher then you have to avoid farking your pupils. Not only is it illegal, you will never work again.

Pert:Agent Smiths Laugh: KrustyKitten: Agent Smiths Laugh: Gilligann: A spokeswoman for Sussex Police said the pair were "safe and well" and added: "Arrangements will now be made for Megan and Jeremy's safe return."

The article makes it sound like the abductor is a victim in all this.

Stop. Breathe.

Now.

What makes you think there actually are any victims in this?

But she's a child! A baby. Of course that poor inoccent child is a victim here. Because she's under 18 she can't possibly be held a responsbile for her actions, she had no idea what she was doing. It's almost like she went out to buy skittles and ended up in France with a 30yr old!!

/he was her teacher tho, that makes it a bit more farked up :(

Not really. It's just one more subjective standard.

In the UK you are in deep trouble if you are in a position of authority and sleep with someone under 18 in your control.

16 is standard age of consent.

Live with it.

If you make the decision to be a teacher then you have to avoid farking your pupils. Not only is it illegal, you will never work again.