Anthony Stadlen is a Daseinsanalyst, existential psychotherapist and family therapist, supervisor and teacher working in London. He is also founder and convenor of the Inner Circle Seminars: an international, interdisciplinary, ethical, existential, phenomenological search for truth in psychotherapy. This blogsite contains details of therapy and of past and future seminars. For therapy or seminars contact Anthony Stadlen at: +44(0)20 8888 6857, +44(0)7809 433 250, or stadlen@aol.com.

‘We believe that the shift of pont of view that these descriptions both embody and demand has an historical significance no less radical than the shift from a demonological to a clinical viewpoint three hundredyears ago.’Thus, in 1964, R. D. Laing and Aaron Esterson introduced their revolutionary descriptions of eleven families of ‘schizophrenics’ in their epochmaking book Sanity, Madness and the Family: Families of Schizophrenics. But fifty years on, the ‘clinical viewpoint’ still rules supreme. Are Laing and Esterson ‘discredited’, as is claimed? Have they been proved wrong? Or are they not yet understood?

Most psychiatrists and psychotherapists say Laing and Esterson said families cause ‘schizophrenia’. In reality, Laing and Esterson wrote: ‘No one can deny us the right to disbelieve in the fact of schizophrenia.’

But most psychiatrists and psychotherapists will tell you
that Laing and Esterson said: ‘families cause schizophrenia’ –the
very ‘schizophrenia’ they insisted they disbelieved in. In other words, most
psychiatrists and psychotherapists find it difficult to read the plain English
that Laing and Esterson wrote. They don’t contradict it –they simply manage
not to see it. Is this because it would be too threatening to them to see it and
to consider it seriously?

We are honoured that Dame Hilary Mantel, the celebrated novelist, twice winner of the Booker Prize, will speak to us today abouthow reading Sanity, Madness and the Familywhen she was not yet twenty-one gave her the courage to write:‘Some of us need a little push, before we recognise we have the right to pick up a pen. In my case it came from a book by the psychiatrists R. D.Laing and Aaron Esterson,Sanity, Madness and the Family... The people in it seemed close enough to touch... Each interview is a novel or play in miniature.So many of these family conversations seemed familiar to me: their swerves and evasions, their doubleness... For most of my life I had been told that I didn't know how the world worked. That afternoon I decided I did know, after all. In the course of my twenty-one years I'd noticed quite a lot. If I wanted to be a writer, I didn't have to worry about inventing material, I'd already got it. The next stage was just to find some words.’Hilary Mantel, at least, had no difficulty understanding what Laing and Esterson were talking about:‘All
the patients profiled in the book are young women. I know their names are
pseudonyms, but over the years I've wondered desperately what happened to them,
and if there's anyone alive who knows, and whether any of them ever cut free
from the choking knotweed of miscommunication and flourished on ground of their
own: Ruth, who was thought odd because she wore coloured stockings; Jean, who
wanted a baby though her whole family told her she didn't; and Sarah, whose
breakdown, according to her family, was caused by too much
thinking.’(http://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/sep/06/1)Anthony
Stadlen, through his historical research, is able to answer some of
Hilary Mantel’s questions. He will report his findings,
starting today with information from Maya Abbott herself about her life
during the more than half a century since the family discussions arranged by
Esterson in 1959 and reported in the book of 1964.

This is the first of a
newsubseries of eleven Inner Circle Seminars on
the eleven families studied in the book.We shall try to approach the so-called ‘problem of schizophrenia’, and
the heart of what happens in families, through reading part of Chapter 1, on ‘Maya Abbott’ and her family, aloud as a drama, and discussing it in
the light of Anthony Stadlen’s historical research. Hilary Mantelwill help us see, as she saw as a young woman of twenty, that what
Laing and Esterson recorded and wrote about is the very stuff of life. There is no‘psychology’ or ‘metapsychology’ deeper than this, or ‘behind’ it. As
Esterson said, these are the deepest secrets. But they are open to all.
All is
there, in a sense, on the surface, in what people say to one another.Adrian Laing, son of R. D. Laing, will also participate in the seminar. He wrote, in his biography of his father (second edition, 2006):‘The highly respected Anthony Stadlen, who has practised as an existential-phenomenological psychotherapist in London for over thirty years, continues to this day to hold well-attended and regular seminars in London on a wide variety of existential-psychotherapy-related topics, including dedicated all-day sessions focusing on the individual families featured in the ground-breaking work Sanity, Madness and the Family, first published over forty years ago.’Your contribution to the seminar will also be welcome.Venue: Durrants Hotel, 26–32 George Street, Marylebone, London W1H 5BJ (http://www.durrantshotel.co.uk/)

The Inner Circle Seminars were founded by Anthony Stadlen in 1996 as an ethical, existential, phenomenological search for truth in psychotherapy. They have been kindly described by Thomas Szasz as ‘Institute for Advanced Studies in the Moral Foundations of Human Decency and Helpfulness’. But they are independent of all institutes, schools and colleges.