For those of you just waking up, Sandra Bullock has come out of seclusion and announced exclusively to People she’s filed for divorce from Jesse James. Not only that, she’s adopted 3 1/2 month old Louis Bardo Bullock from New Orleans who she plans to make Jewish because she hates Nazis not so much. I’m not even joking:

The magazine asked the question, “Were you aware of any interest [Jesse] may have had in white supremacy or Nazism?”
Bullock responded, “The photo shocked me and made me sad. This is not the man I married. This was stupid, this was ignorant. Racism, anti-Semitism, sexism, homophobia, anything Nazi and a boatload of other things have no place in my life.”
Bullock added, “And the man I married felt the same.”
As for her newly adopted African-American baby, Bullock told the magazine she arranged for the child to have a bris — the Jewish circumcision ceremony.

And Sandra Bullock made a Nazi sex tape. I didn’t believe it at first, but after all the ham-fisted baby shenanigans, I’m now 90% positive she’s on video telling Jesse James to “Holocaust” her ass because it controls the media and sucks the blood out of infants. There’s really no other way to interpret this.

I’m with you Duck. The reason that most parents choose to have it done earlier in life is that the child will not remember the experience. And it’s obviously a painful experience. It has nothing to do with child abuse. Most men, I’m guessing (being that I am not a man), would prefer to have it circumcised and done at a point in their life where they won’t remember it. Every guy I’ve discussed the topic with has said they would prefer it circumcised to un-circumcised. And for understandable reasons. If you wait until the kid is old enough to decide for himself, he will not have it done because of the sheer fact that it’s your manhood and it will hurt immensely. Child abuse, my ass! How ridiculous can you be?!?

Before my generation none of the men in my family were circumcised, probably because they were born at home and not in a hospital. It’s an unnecessary procedure. As far as the hygiene aspect, how hard is it to teach a child to wash his di-k?

Give me a break, circumcision is NOT child abuse! If anything it’s a kindness. My husband is SO glad his parents had it done for him. You don’t remember the pain, whereas if you were to get it later in life you definitely would and it’s more sanitary. Child abuse, ha!

While I wouldn’t call it child abuse, it’s decidedly NOT more hygienic or a kindness. It’s a totally unnecessary medical procedure done to a person who has no say in the matter. And it’s essentially irreversible. If it were something that could be easily changed later, whatever. But it’s not. It also can make your penis smaller and less sensitive.

It’s my experience that men pretty much love their penises either way. I just don’t think it’s necessary to force a cosmetic surgical procedure on a kid just because you’re trying to put a positive spin on the fact that your soon to be ex husband is an anti-Semite, racist tool.

Umm, I’m a circumcised guy who is vehemently against child genital mutilation. I certainly have what you and other fetishists would consider a “pretty” circumcised dick (eww — I hated even having to type that). People who are against cutting into babies are not ashamed of their own penises. They are ashamed of people who think it’s morally okay to slice off part of an unconsenting child’s genitals without anesthetic. Let’s get real.

“Give it a rest, weird dudes with ugly dicks”
I guess you are american, so the rest of the world is alien to you since only in america the circumcision is done on regular bassis.
BTW I don t wish i were circ. cause i can go and cut the skin even now, but you my friend you can t change it.