Translate

Tuesday, 29 December 2015

Peter McKelvie has given me permission to publish a letter he sent to a senior Labour politician on 3rd August. No reply has been received as of today (8th August). The politician’s name has been redacted for the time being.

Dear (name redacted)

I am a retired Child Protection professional and the person who contacted Tom Watson, MP, in September 2012, as a result of which he asked a PMQ on 24th October 2012 regarding a paedophile ring with links to No.10, a question which led to the Metropolitan Police setting up Operation Fairbank/Fernbridge, which I ‘m sure you will be aware is both ongoing and rapidly expanding following significant witnesses at long last coming forward to tell the truth about the alleged appalling collusion of senior politicians of all the main political parties in the alleged abuse carried out by their colleagues.

I was sickened to the stomache when I first heard Edward Heath’s Chief Whip, the late Tim Fortescue’s account on Michael Cockerell’s 1995 BBC documentary of how Whips covered up criminal activity by MP’s towards young children and I don’t need to tell you the revulsion I felt towards our political masters having worked with sexually abused children over a 30 year period when I heard of how the Whips ran the Dirt Book system.

I was very pleased to see the BBC Newsnight team show the Tim Fortescue interview again on 7th July this year because survivors of abuse now have more strength, belief and courage than politicians are going to be braced for. Time is on their side and this time they will not go away until they get the answers they deserve.

I wrote to David Cameron on 16th September 2013 asking him to set up an independent body to examine the allegations of abuse by elite groups within the Establishment and said ” It would be better if you led such an exercise before it is forced upon you by public demand. THE LATTER WILL HAPPEN IN TIME “

Not only did people power win the day on the demand for an independent inquiry but it further demonstrated to politicians that survivors and their supporters would not accept token gestures such as the appointment of puppet figures to lead such an Inquiry.

My reason for writing to you is very specific.

You will be aware how the evidence against Peter Morrison has become much more specific in recent months culminating in a statement by Barry Strevens, Mrs. Thatcher’s personal bodyguard that he warned her that Morrison was ” involved in sex parties with under-age boys “

Graham Nicholls, who ran the Chester Trades Council when Morrison was Chester’s MP, wrote the following :-

” After the 1987 General Election, around 1990, I attended a meeting of Chester Labour Party where we were informed by the agent, Christine Russell, that Peter Morrison would not be standing in 1992. He had been caught in the toilets at Crewe Station with a 15 year boy. A deal was struck between Labour, the local Tories, the local press and the Police that if he stood down at the next election the matter would go no further. Morrison walked away scot – free. “

An Independent Inquiry will need to examine this alleged scenario in forensic detail.

For the last 2 years I have been working closely with a very trusted, committed and dedicated team of retired police officers, investigative journalists and child protection managers and we will do everything in our power to assist and support survivors to get the answers as to who colluded over the horrific abuse they suffered at the hands of powerful individuals.

Survivors have shown enough faith in some of our group to disclose historical abuse that they have felt too frightened to talk about for decades.

It is through my work with this group that I have now received from 3 seperate sources an account of an alleged role that you personally played in the cover up over Peter Morrison’s rape of children and young people which he allegedly carried out in the full knowledge of senior politicians of all main parties.

This is the gist of the allegations :-

” A British Aerospace Trade Union Convenor said a member said he was raped by Peter Morrison as a child – the Convenor went to the National HQ of the union who put it to Labour front bench. (name redacted) was saying that the Tory Front Bench had been approached. “

This I’m sure you will agree is very specific.

A second and third source confirms these allegations and it is alleged that these conversations first took place at a 1993/4 Xmas party hosted by the Welsh Parliamentary Labour Party.

I would like to give you the opportunity to address these allegations as they implicate you in a very serious cover up of the rape of a child.

Obviously I have no way of knowing whether the statements of other people are true but I will certainly present the allegations to the Independent Inquiry and demand that everyone involved is interviewed on oath.

Sunday, 20 December 2015

Child abuser Lord Greville Janner of Braunstone has died only 9 months after requesting in writing that he continue to sit in the House of Lords. He had spent the last 25 years avoiding justice for the crimes he committed against young boys and has died just four months before a ‘trial of the facts’ which was set to conclusively demonstrate that Greville Janner was a sick child abusing bastard.

Sources familiar with the ‘trial of the facts’ had told The Needle that about 100 witnesses were due to give evidence against Janner and that the evidence was overwhelming.

Questions will now be asked about whether Leicestershire police and the CPS conspired to protect Janner by failing to prosecute him earlier and whether the delay as a consequence of the DPP Alison Saunders original decision not to prosecute Janner earlier this year allowed Janner to escape justice one last time.

Greville Janner was scum. Those that protected him are scum, and those who are friends of his and wish to eulogise his passing are also scum.

Only Janner’s victims deserve sympathy.

Once again, the Establishment can breath a sigh of relief, knowing as they do so that the sick perverted crimes documented by the conclusive prosecution case against one of their own, will remain out of the press.

He had been suffering from dementia and died peacefully at his home on Saturday aged 87, his family said.

The peer had been accused of 22 counts of sex offences against boys – allegations his family denied.

A “trial of the facts” set for April will no longer take place. A lawyer representing alleged victims said they had been denied justice.

Liz Dux, who represents six alleged victims, said: “This is devastating news for my clients. They have waited so long to see this case come before the courts, to be denied justice at the final hurdle is deeply frustrating.”

The Goddard inquiry, which is examining child sexual abuse claims, may now examine the allegations, the BBC’s Tom Symonds said.

Thursday, 10 December 2015

SECRET documents reveal a State conspiracy to jail innocent men. The documents sensationally revealed in Parliament yesterday implicate ex Tory prime minister and suspected serial pedophile SIr Edward Heath. In a conspiracy with spooks and senior cops who all colluded to secure convictions against the 'Shrewsbury Pickets'.

The government has cited national security concerns as the reason it cannot release classified documents that could help overturn convictions against 24 builders, including jailed pair Ricky Tomlinson and Des Warren. National Security is a common excuse used by the failed UK State to hide its criminal activities against the people of the United Kingdom.

But as the world thinks about 'Human Rights Day' we consider those activists
in the UK who have recently been set-up by the State . These modern activists should have their cases
reviewed immediately. It is utterly wrong for justice to be delayed
by 40 years as with the Shewsbury Pickets. To allow Miscarriages of justice against activists to stand and not be investigated, allows corrupt governments to
set-up more and more activists and cover-up these heinous Human Rights abuses.

Shadow home secretary Andy Burnham blew the ‘Shewsbury Pickets’ case
wide open by exposing previously unseen documents in a parliamentary debate on
the historic injustice.

The explosive contents could help clear the names of the 24,
nine of whom have since died, over four decades after the 1972 strike over pay
and safety.

Mr Burnham said: “The documents I have revealed can only lead us to one conclusion — the Shrewsbury 24 were the convenient scapegoats of a government campaign to undermine the trade unions and the victims of a politically orchestrated show trial.”

They include a memo, marked “secret,” which proves the security services helped make the infamous Reds Under the Bed TV documentary.

The programme, which linked the workers to supposed communist infiltration of the Labour Party, was shown on the very night that the prosecution concluded their case against the pickets.

The memo was sent to a senior Foreign and Commonwealth (FCO) official by the head of the Information Research Department, which Mr Burnham described as a “covert propaganda unit” operating within the department.

It said: “We had a discreet but considerable hand in this programme. Mr Wyatt was given a large dossier of our own background material. It is clear from internal evidence in the programme that he drew extensively on this.”

Another memo reveals that knowledge of this smear campaign went all the way to the top.

After the programme was shown, then PM Edward Heath was sent a transcript of Reds Under the Bed.

Mr Heath replied: “We want as much of this as possible.”

A further note from the PM’s parliamentary private secretary alludes to a “new unit” which Mr Heath hoped was “in being and actively producing.”

“There we have it,” Mr Burnham told stunned MPs.

This is the same Prime Minister Edward Heath being posthumouslyinvestigated by Police for the rape and murder of children from care homes.

“The security services were helping to make a TV programme that was not just nakedly political in its aims of damaging the Labour Party. But in the case of the Shrewsbury 24, a programme that was prejudicial to their trial.

“The government were complicit in making that happen.”

Other documents unearthed by the Shrewsbury 24 Campaign reveal how then Tory home secretary Robert Carr directed police evidence-gathering.

A note from a meeting between chief constables and the prosecutors shows some inconvenient witness statements were destroyed.

It said some were “destroyed after a fresh statement had been obtained” because the first statement was taken “before officers taking the statements knew what we were trying to prove.”

That could be connected to a letter from the attorney general to Carr in January 1973 advising him that there was “no evidence of violence of damage to property” at the pickets.

Labour MP Ian Lavery, chair of the party’s trade union group, said it proved the case was a “miscarriage of justice organised deliberately by the state.”

Even Policing Minister Mike Penning, who refused to reopen the case in October, was stunned by the evidence. He congratulated the campaign for unearthing the documents, but bought time by saying:” I don’t make instant judgments.”

And who presided over the Shewsbury trial none other than Government Stooge, notorious Freemason, and corrupt judge Sir Maurice Drake. Drake also presided over the libel trial of North Wales Chief Superintendent Gorden Anglesea. The top Police office who raped children from Children's homes and and then sued the newspapers and magazines who revealed the truth. Drake helped Anglesea illegally collect £375, 000 in damages and helped the State cover-up the truth about VIP child abuse for decades. Angelsea was protected by another senior Judge, friend of serial Pedophile Sir Greville Janner, Sir Ronald Waterhouse. Drake also jailed three innocent men for the murder of Carl Bridgewater. And to top of his career he jailed for life an innocent Jeremy Bamber for the murder of his family. Of Course Drake is dead and lived well all his life from his criminal fraud on the tax payer. His family happily inherited the blood money and live in St Albans

Ludovic Kennedy said ‘most of the spate of miscarriages of criminal justice that have occurred during my lifetime have been the consequence of police corruption and judicial naivety; the police in giving false evidence to secure convictions against those they have deluded themselves into thinking are guilty and the judiciary in invariably accepting their word in preference to those of innocent defendants.’

But Actually it is worse. If Queens Counsel's and senior Judges are really stupid t and unable to see truth from fiction hen they should not be allowed to sit in judgment over anyone. If they are not stupid how can they fail to see the elephants in the living rooms. How can they fail to see innocence which countless untrained people find no problem in seeing. They spend their whole working life in the Courts and I can confirm they know how corrupt the system is. They could not fail to know. There is only one reason they go along with such evil and that is because they are morally bankrupt and utterly corrupt.

Corrupt Judges lead to kangaroo Courts where defendants have no chance against the well funded State trio of Judge, Prosecution and Police all working together to deny them even a vestige of justice

How do Corrupt judges 'get away with their crimes' ? They are intelligent, plausible, educated, move in the right circles. Their psychopathic tenancies mean they are incapable of empathy or compassion and being elitists they dismiss the plebeian notion that that suffering of the common man is of any importance.

Builders’ union Ucatt acting general secretary Brian Rye said about the Shewbury Pickets “In the 21st century — if this is truly a democratic country — its citizens are entitled to know why innocent men were sent to prison more than 40 years ago, under a trumped up, 19th-century law.”

Sunday, 29 November 2015

Surveillance operation targeting sister of former
paratrooper killed by racist police 'not properly authorised' but the Crown Prosecution Service refuse the charge the 4 police officers who spied on her. CPS wrote to Janet Alder saying it won’t charge four senior
police officers after finding lack of sufficient evidence to secure misconduct
conviction. Lack of evidence ? They admitted organizing an operation to spy on her and her solicitor and barrister.

Janet Alder has been
trying for 16 years to find out what happened to her brother Christopher Alder
who died in Police custody. What happened! the Police launched a campaign to spy on her
and her legal representatives. The Courts and the Prosecution service protected the police who killed her brother and then spied on her. The three organs of the state have conspired
to cover up the murder of Christopher and the persecution of his sister Janet.

All Janet wanted was the truth about how her brother former Paratrooper Christopher Alder. He died in Police custody with his trousers around his ankles, handcuffed and face down in the custody suit. He chocked to death whilst police officers parodied monkey noises. The State then stole his body and substituted the body of an old lady to give to his family for burial. Janet and her Family who had buried Christopher with honor found out 10 years later the State still had Christopher's body.

The sister of a former paratrooper who was unlawfully killed
in a police station has described how she felt “terrorised by the state” after
it was revealed that up to 14 police officers were deployed to spy on her. The
police operation targeting Janet Alder, which included surveillance and
allegedly at least one attempt to eavesdrop on a conversation with her
barrister, was not properly authorised, prosecutors said.

Police spied on Alder after she began campaigning to uncover
the details of her brother Christopher’s death in a Hull police station in
April 1998. One of the most controversial deaths in police custody, it inspired
a decade-long quest for the truth. “I am absolutely appalled,” Alder told the
Guardian. “I feel terrorised by the state.”

Prosecutors examining claims that police spied on sister
after death of her brother

In a letter sent to her on Thursday, the Crown Prosecution
Service said it had decided not to charge four senior officers in charge of the
surveillance after concluding that there was not enough evidence to secure a
conviction of misconduct in public office. But it outlined evidence showing
that surveillance officers followed Alder, her barrister and her supporters
after a July 2000 hearing of the inquest into her brother’s death. The CPS said
that there was evidence that part of the surveillance team followed them to her
hotel, while other members tracked another group to a car park.

The second-in-command of the operation told an internal
police inquiry that “somebody went for a drink with a solicitor. One remit was
to try and overhear the conversation.” That comment “raises significant
concern”, the CPS added, as eavesdropping on legally protected conversations
between a lawyer and their client is “improper and unlawful”.

Alder said that ever since she started campaigning over her
brother’s death, she had feared that the police were monitoring her. “It just
confirmed everything I thought and that I was not being paranoid,” she said. “I
never in my life knew anything like this - I always believed that the system
did the right thing. For that to happen to me, it was so scary. I was just a
normal working-class woman looking after my kids.”

With regard to the decision not to charge senior officers, a
CPS spokeswoman said: “Any prosecution would rely heavily on the evidence of
police officers involved in the surveillance. As the events happened 15 years
ago, the majority of the witnesses spoken to had, at best, a limited
recollection of events.”

The CPS added that there was no “clear or reliable evidence”
that the police had eavesdropped on her and her barrister. “This decision was
supported by advice from external counsel,” it added.

CCTV footage recorded him gasping
for breath as officers chatted and joked around him. They believed
that Alder, whose trousers and pants had been pulled down to his ankles, was play-acting. Monkey-like
noises could be heard as Alder lay dead.

Five police officers put on trial for manslaughter and
misconduct in public office were cleared on the orders of a judge two years later.
Humberside police apologised to the family for failing to “treat Christopher
with sufficient compassion”.

Christopher Alder died in April 1998 handcuffed and
face down on the floor of a Hull police station surrounded by police officers,
after choking on his own vomit. Photograph: Rex Shutterstock

Four years ago, it emerged that Alder’s family had buried an
elderly woman instead of Christopher after his
body was discovered in a hospital mortuary.

A two-year investigation by the Independent Police Complaints
Commission found that police had authorised undercover surveillance of
protesters outside the inquest at Hull crown court. Senior officers authorised
the surveillance of the protesters, known as Operation Yarrow, for the whole of
the six-week inquest. Officers were told to use “mobile, foot and technical
surveillance”.

Police anticipated that controversy over the paratrooper’s
death might result in public disorder, according to the CPS. There was
evidence, however, that “members of a surveillance team were directed to
undertake, and did undertake, surveillance with a broader remit than that
allowed for in the authorisations,” the CPS said. It added that mobile and
technical surveillance “was not properly authorised” because it took place away
from the court and commenced before it was meant to.

Piers Arnold, an official in the CPS senior crime and
terrorism division, wrote: “It is difficult to see how any such targeted
surveillance could have been justified or directed at issues of public order
which was the written justification for each of the surveillance authorities.

“Following the family of an alleged victim of police
negligence/brutality and their legal representative instructed for an ongoing
inquest into that death, whether or not it involved eavesdropping, would
involve a high level of intrusion and require good reasons. No such reasons are
discernible from the evidence.” But he added that the evidence on who ordered
the surveillance was too unclear to start a prosecution. The CPS believed that
it was not possible to establish a motive for the surveillance.

Alder said: “The police were trying to deflect attention
away from the unlawful killing verdict of the inquest.”

A spokeswoman for Humberside police said: “We note the
decision of the Crown Prosecution Service, which the family of Christopher
Alder has the right to appeal.”

Police have come under growing criticism for covertly
monitoring grieving families who have challenged their misconduct. An official
report disclosed last year that undercover police officers had gathered
intelligence on 18 families who had highlighted allegations of police
wrongdoing. They include the parents of Stephen Lawrence, who was killed by a
racist gang in 1993.

Undercover officers also gathered intelligence on the
relatives of Jean Charles de Menezes, the Brazilian electrician mistakenly shot
dead by police in the aftermath of the 2005 terrorist attacks on London, and on
Cherry Groce, who was shot and paralysed by police in a raid on her home in
1985.

The death of 20-year-old student Ricky Reel, who in 1997 was
found in a river after abuse by racists, also prompted intelligence operations
on relatives.

The undercover operations are to be examined at a public
inquiry by Lord Justice Pitchford, which will scrutinise the theft of child
identity and police spies’ relationships with targeted women. Police have said
intelligence on family campaigns was collected accidentally by undercover
officers tasked with infiltrating political groups.

These evil people who work for the failed UK State could not make their hatred towards truth and justice more obvious!