On 6/30/18 14:22, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Regarding TCP/IP networking for Amateur Radio, sometimes it's wrong for
> voice. Comparing the size of an IPV6 header and 40 ms of Codec2 speech
> demonstrates the problem, the data payload can be smaller than a single
> address, not to mention the entire header. Connection-based protocols
> rather than packet switching can make more sense for voice.
Two words: "header" and "compression".
More later -- got an event to attend.
Phil