Obama Should Avoid Rush to Judgment in Ecuador

The radical left in Latin America often prides itself in its ability to stir up the masses and make nations ungovernable by elected officials and representative governments, especially centrist or conservative regimes. But when popular unrest or insubordination, threatens a Leftist leader, the Left cries “coup” and “conspiracy.” The current situation in Ecuador following clashes between the government of Rafael Correa and striking police officials is unclear.

Having won a new constitution that expanded executive power, Correa was clearly leading Ecuador down the path toward “presidentialism:” a strong accumulation of executive power at the expense of other institutions and normal restraints such as independent courts, legislative checks, and a free media. One who has written extensively on the topic is Secretary Clinton’s point man on Latin America: Dr. Arturo Valenzuela. He sagely observed that presidentialism can lead to “the concentration and even the abuse of power in the leader’s hands” and warned that it an be perverted into “quasi-authoritarianism or even dictatorship.”

When assessing Ecuador under Correa, one must also take into account reports of dubious connections with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Iranians and other anti-Americans. Correa’s readiness to align Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez is another cause for general concern. In short, The U.S. is not dealing with a true friend of the U.S. or its interests.

In the clash of September 30, it is unclear which side, perhaps both, acted with rash precipitation. At the end of the day, Correa and his supporters began to cry, “coup,” called in the Army and issued an emergency decree establishing a state of siege and granting the government emergency powers. Correa appears to have recovered control of his country, for now. Cool heads need to prevail.

As events unfold in Ecuador, there are two useful points to take away. The first is to keep in view the Left’s assumption that when street protests bring down a pro-U.S. or conservative government, this is a matter of social justice in work. But, when disaffected officials or victims of Leftist misdeeds protest, riot, or challenge government authority, it becomes a coup” or conspiracy. There is a need for facts, not opinions in the case of Ecuador.

The second is that the Left is already claiming the U.S. and the Organization of American States (OAS) must act decisively to prevent another situation such as occurred in Honduras last year. Yet, these are the same actors that have worked hard to exclude the U.S. from emerging South American councils and have done a much to thwart the OAS’s role in monitoring the internal quality of democratic governance.

Forcing an elected president out of office as the result of a police strike is a bad idea. Strikers, protesters, and rogue officials cannot be allowed to undermine government at will.

This said, the Obama Administration, needs to be prudent in assessing the situation in Ecuador. It should avoid a rush to judgment as it did in Honduras. It must recognize that excesses of presidentialism and populist misrule can cause defensive reactions in the body politic. It must not give a diplomatic or emotional blank check to an executive on the warpath and vowing vengeance.

Join The Discussion

As someone who has been to Ecuador a few times, I can say that it seemed to be a pretty stable place with decent people and a rather calm and friendly public. The hospitality and honesty of the people I came into contact with was greater than anything I had experienced before. I was VERY impressed. Never once did I need to bribe anybody or feel like I might get robbed. Correa certainly has leftist roots and the centralizing power that this article mentiones is troubling. We all know where this sort of thing leads. History is pretty clear about this.

However…. one thing that Correa has brought to the country is a measure of stability. From a "boots on the ground" perspective, I can say that this is highly beneficial for the people of Ecuador. How can you expect to start a business if the government is constantly turning over? Anyway, I know that it won't be good for Heritage if leftist leaders are shown in a positive light on their website, but I believe that the stability that Correa brought with him (up until now at least) has been very beneficial to the country.

Joe is totally out of touch with the reality here in Ecuador. The last assertion I would make about Correa is that he has brought "stability." As he himself claims frequently, he is all about "change" and change affects the interests of many, many people. Correa has taken on the interests of the following groups: the police, the military, civilian government workers, teachers, students, miners, municipal governments, labor unions, indigenous groups, large farmers, and of course business owners. It is no wonder that there have been constant demonstrations and protests during the past few years, Joe, is that stability?

Perhaps they believe it is a "coup" or conspiracy because of the long history of US supported coups and conspiracies in Central and South American governments. It is not a naive or biased assumption. Nor is it some theory without documented merit. If it is the case in Honduras and now Ecuador that US money was not involved in the instability we see, it would be nearly unprecedented in the history of US and Latin American relations.

Don’t have time to read the Washington Post or New York Times? Then get The Morning Bell, an early morning edition of the day’s most important political news, conservative commentary and original reporting from a team committed to following the truth no matter where it leads.

Email address

Ever feel like the only difference between the New York Times and Washington Post is the name? We do. Try the Morning Bell and get the day’s most important news and commentary from a team committed to the truth in formats that respect your time…and your intelligence.