Search form

You are here

On Saturday 25th May 2013, Liberty GB leader Paul Weston spoke at the Party's first ever public meeting, in Croydon, South London. Here is the recording of that historic speech, and below it the full transcript.

I was going to talk today about "Is Britain Sustainable", but events have rather overtaken that on Wednesday night with the brutal murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby, and as horrific as that was I am more horrified by the reaction of the media and by the reaction of our government.

David Cameron tells us this is a betrayal of Islam. Boris Johnson tells us Islam has nothing to do with this. When they butchered that soldier, they quoted verses from the Koran, they shouted "Allahu Akbar" as they were chopping the poor guy's head off. This was done in the name of Islam, and no matter what our treacherous politicians have got to say about this, this was done in the name of Islam. And everybody is in denial in this country.

The BBC are trying to pretend this is because we are in Afghanistan, because we are in Iraq, because we are oppressing them worldwide.

The Daily Telegraph â€“ which is supposedly a right-wing newspaper â€“ every single article they've had on this they've switched off the comments, because they know the comments are going to be hanging David Cameron out to dry. They will be telling him: Don't lie to us, we know Islam was involved and no matter what you're going to say about it, this has to be the truth, because it is the truth. And they turned off all the comments. In The Spectator they did exactly the same thing, another supposedly right-leaning periodical. The reason that they've done this is because they have to admit that if there is a problem with Islam, then they have to do something about it, and if you want to do something about it, that automatically makes you a far-right, racist, xenophobic bigot, and they don't want to be labelled that, so they would rather betray their entire country than be labelled a racist.

This whole racism thing has got to stop, because we are no longer a country with a few immigrants that we have to be nice to. At the time back in the fifties and sixties we were, but that is no longer the case, and when they talk and label us as racists, they're doing this because the left liberals have declared a racial and cultural war on the indigenous people of this country. It's what they're doing. Everything that they are doing right now is literally a racial and cultural war.

You look at someone like Peter Sutherland, who's the UN immigration/ migration official. He has said that in order for the European Union to actually achieve what it wants to do, which is political union of the entire continent of Europe, they have to de-homogenise the nation states.

Now what does he mean by de-homogenise? What he means is we can no longer be considered an indigenous people; we must open the doors to the Third World, we must break down the nation states, and only when the nation state is broken down can they achieve full totalitarian control over any number of bickering communities, as they call us â€“ not the bickering, just the communities.

Since Tony Blair came in 1997, we have had eight million immigrants coming into Britain, principally into England, and we've had two million indigenous Brits move out. Now that's a ten million difference. This is an astonishing figure, it's never happened before in the history of this country, in the history of any countries really. And the result is that our cities are now becoming minority white. But even that is a slight lie because they're not minority white across the whole spectrum. If you get down to the ten- to twenty-year-olds, we are a huge minority already.

If you go into schools in London, very rarely do you see white children these days. The 2011 Census is now saying that we are officially, in our cities, minorities. This is an extraordinary thing and ten percent of the children in this country now are Muslim and Islam is growing nine times faster than any demographic in this country. It's a huge growth.

People get very confused about the fact that when they say there are only ten percent, ten percent of the children are Muslim, well they say: That's fine, it's only ten percent, you're still ninety percent. Well we're not ninety percent, we're probably seventy-five, eighty percent, because the other ones, other immigrants are not necessarily Muslim, but they are not us.

But we only have between one to one point three children each. The Muslims are having four children each. If ten percent of the population has four children, that ten percent becomes forty percent. If eighty percent of the population has only one to one point five child, they get down to fifty-five, fifty, forty percent very quickly. Within one generation we are going to be looking at comparable numbers of people aged twenty to thirty, and that's a big problem because that age group are capable of inflicting violence. It doesn't matter how many more of us there are over the age of fifty or sixty, we don't count. It's the young ones that count, and the young ones in our future are not going to be us.

We were never asked about this. Back in the 1950s when immigration first started coming â€“ in not particularly huge numbers, just in the thousands â€“ and people were complaining then, we were told: Look, the numbers are very small, it doesn't matter, the numbers are so small it will have no impact on your lives. Then the numbers got bigger and we were then told: Look, all right the numbers are bigger but they're going to integrate, so you have nothing to worry about. Then the numbers became huge, and they said: Well all right, they're not going to integrate there's too many of them, we'll introduce this new ideology, we'll call it multiculturalism, and they can have their separate lives, you can have your separate lives and we'll all get on very well together.

Now the numbers are so huge, we are being told that we must celebrate this, we must celebrate this diversity, this racial and cultural diversity.

Douglas Murray a few months ago came up with a fantastic example of this. He said: At what point in diversity can we stop celebrating it? When we become sixty percent of the population, maybe we should still be celebrating our cultural and racial diversity, but when we become forty percent, are we supposed to celebrate that? When we become ten percent, are we really expected to celebrate that? And of course the answer is no, we should not.

We were never asked. And now, finally, if you don't celebrate the left liberal version of multicultural/ racial utopia they will come round if you complain about it, and they will lock you up for inciting racial and religious hatred.

They also tell us of course that we benefit economically and culturally from opening the doors to the Third World. You know, back in 2004, Channel four were going to bring out a TV documentary about the â€“ I'm not going to call it grooming because it's not grooming, and it's not paedophilia as such, it is sexual slavery and it's based on racial superiority, it's a racial crime â€“ and they were going to bring out this documentary in 2004. The police in Bradford, which is where it was happening, said if you bring that out the place is going to go up in flames â€“ because they'd recently had riots in Bradford â€“ if you bring this out now Bradford will erupt. Now this apparently is a result of our communities living in harmonious peace together, which of course we don't, it's an absolute lie.

The tensions in Bradford back then were huge, the tensions in Bradford are huge now. But it's not just Bradford, it's Birmingham, it's Luton, it's Leicester, it's London, it's Manchester, it is all across the country.

And what do they bring with them? I'd like to know. I like curry, I really like curry, but apart from curry I don't see anything that they've brought with them. They've brought murder, rape, mugging, huge amounts of crime, and also the numbers are ... .

From the cultural point of view they've brought nothing. Economically they tell us that they are â€¦ without them we would be an economic failure, but again this is an absolute lie.

We are now told we need to build five million new houses between now and 2020. In the old days when you built five million houses people bought them, but that's not the case any more. The state is now taking your taxpayer money to build five million houses to house people that don't have any money of their own to live on. We're also told we need to have eight hundred thousand new places at schools. We don't have these places, we don't even have the physical schools. We have to build these apparently, which is going to cost a hundred billion pounds â€“ that's a hundred thousand million pounds by 2020. We're bankrupt as it is, we don't have any money.

The NHS system, which is the National Health Service, is no longer the national health service, it is the international health service. It is failing and it's failing because we have opened the doors to people with no money, who are coming in here and abusing what should have been a fantastic left-wing socialist ideal â€“ looking after the poor and looking after the oppressed of your own country â€“ and they have destroyed that completely by opening the doors to the Third World.

Our prisons are full. It costs a huge amount of money to put these people in prison. We don't have enough prisons, we've got to build more prisons, even though it is very hard to send anybody to a prison.

It is all just astonishing.

1997, before Tony Blair's treacherous government opened the door to the Third World, our welfare bill was fifty-six billion pounds. Last year it was a hundred and ten billion. Now why has that figure doubled over that period? If these people coming in are an economic bonus for us, why are we paying a hundred and ten billion pounds a year now, compared to fifty-six billion pounds a few years ago?

We don't benefit economically. We are paying to colonise, with the Third World, our country, and we do not benefit culturally. We have, as I've just described, everything that goes on.

Do we have the moral and legal right to survive as a race and a culture in our own country? We're told, by the left liberals again, that we're a mongrel race: there's no such thing as the indigenous English, there's no such thing as the indigenous British. You're a mongrel race, you were formed by immigration.

Now to a certain extent that's true, we've got Roman and Celtic and Viking and Anglo-Saxon and Norman â€“ but most of those physically invaded us and beat us. We wouldn't be that hotchpotch if we had repelled them at the beaches. They invaded us and as a result we became who we are today.

But from the twelfth century until World War Two the English â€“ and I'm going to have to talk specifically about the English now â€“ the English became the indigenous race between the twelfth century and World War Two. And that is who we were. When we see those pictures of our soldiers going off and fighting, that is who we were. It was our country, it was our race, it was our people. We've been formed by centuries of the sameness, of the same culture, of Christianity, of altruism â€“ all of these things made us what we were. We were typical, that was indigenous.

Tony Blair told us that we could not, under UN guidelines, refer to ourselves as an indigenous people, and the reason he did that was because if we were allowed to say we were indigenous, what he was doing would have been illegal under the UN treaties.

I have to read this bit out to you:

"The UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples states every indigenous individual has a right to a nationality. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture."

Multiculturalism is destroying our culture. Multiculturalism tells Third World people that they have a history, a heritage, a tradition that they should be proud of; they tell us that our entire past is colonialism, oppression, slavery, murder, warfare. We are not allowed to have our own culture. According to the UN we are, and that is why traitor Tony Blair said you cannot be labelled as an indigenous people.

I don't know if anybody saw my little argument with Sonia Gable, a communist who runs Searchlight magazine. She, when she heard this new party Liberty GB had started, she said: Another fascist right-wing party. So I went onto her site and I asked her: What exactly is fascist about us? She said: You're against immigration, you're against this, you're against that. And I asked her a simple question, I said: Do we have a moral and legal right as English to exist in our own homeland? This argument went on for a while but basically she said: No, you don't, your past is evil, you deserve everything that you now get as a result of what your ancestors did a long long time ago.

Now this is a really wicked thing to do, and when you look at the numbers involved and the fact that we are going to become a minority in our own country before 2050 â€“ well before 2050 for the younger people â€“ that I term to be genocide. And I'm backed up again by the United Nations definition on genocide, which quite specifically says:

"In the present convention genocide means any of the acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part a national, ethnical, racial or religious group and deliberately inflicting on that group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction, in whole or in part."

Now, go to any city centre which is inundated with the Third World. You will not see any white people in Tower Hamlets, you will not see white people in parts of Luton, parts of Leicester, all across the country, because they have been driven out, they have lost their right to exist as a culture and a race in their own country. This is what's happened in an incredibly short period of time, and it started from a small base. Now that small base of people, when they double, when that demographicÂ doubles from a hundred thousand to two hundred thousand that doesn't really matter. But when you get to the point now where we've got four million Muslims in this country, they are going to become eight million within the next decade, and then sixteen million, and then thirty-two million. And we meanwhile are dwindling as a race.

Our government is against us, our media is against us, we are losing a racial war, we are losing a cultural war. We've lost, essentially, today, because we're standing up now trying to do something about it but we are not helped by our own people who are running our government and running our country and running our education and running our media and running our councils. They are intent on seeing us reduced to a small, servile race of people.

Why they want to do this I simply don't know. Some of them are evil, some of them are naÃ¯ve and stupid and don't understand. But combined with the evil and with the naivety we are in serious, serious trouble, and our children and our grandchildren are going to be utterly confused. How did you allow this to happen? What sort of people were you to sit back and allow this to happen under your noses? Because you were frightened of being called a racist? Really, one word? One word has made you sit back and do nothing while your country was ripped from underneath your feet? You have got to be joking!

But we're not joking. We are trying to do something about it but our government, the European Union, the United Nations, they are intent on ripping our country and our culture out from under our feet.

It is so important that we are not allowing ourselves to be called a racist if we stand up and say: I want to protect my country, I want to protect my culture, I want to protect my race. You are the racist, because what you are doing is probably the most evil act of criminal racism carried out in the history of mankind. You have deliberately reduced an indigenous people to servitude.

They are the racists, the left liberals are the racists. We are decent, proud patriots and we should be very proud of ourselves. We've got to keep fighting this until we win.