It seems he always has a new document dump or some hint of information, whenever someone begins to question him or his motives.

His latest came in a pair of tweets on Tuesday morning, alleging that there was a plan in place to knock out Trump, in favor of Pence, and that Hillary Clinton was behind it.

In the first of a pair of tweets from an account WikiLeaks said was activited by its founder, Assange claimed that Trump’s 2016 presidential election opponent Hillary Clinton stated privately this month that she is “pushing for a Pence takeover.” He claimed Clinton views Pence as “predictable hence defeatable.”

But she has already been defeated, and she may try, but she won’t be coming back, so how is he, already in office, “defeatable”?

Quote:Vice President Pence on Thursday vowed that the Trump administration would "use the full force of the law" to go after those involved in WikiLeaks's latest document dump if the materials it released are shown to be valid CIA documents.

"Trafficking in national security information, as is alleged WikiLeaks has done here, is a very serious offense," Pence said during an interview on Fox News's "Special Report."

"It represents a compromise of the security of the American people," he said.

“This president and this administration will take that very seriously and use the full force of the law and resources of the United States to hold all of those to account that were involved," he added...
More

!? I thought this guy was smart. There's only one reaction here that would be legit. "This must be investigated" with a possible "I recuse myself, meanwhile."

Here's the problem, skipping the fact that Wikileaks has posted over a 10 million documents and no one has ever found them to be bogus, not even one time. (Srsly? 10 million documents, and not one phoney? MSM can't even make it through one document without lying.) and getting right to the part where someone just say "there's the perp" and your defense is what? "No I'm not!" If you really thought you were innocent, you'd wait for the loon to try to prove his case, not deny it and then ask the CIA to hunt him down.

So I guess that's a tacit admission of guilt. And kudos to Sig, the deep state theory is true, we have two CIA agents who are Pence buddies saying it, and Hillary saying it.

and sorry to anyone who bought that this might be a good idea (hint: it's not) It really isn't. Pence is very far right wing, whereas Trump is a moderate. So unless you want to pray the gay away...

What happens now better happen smoothly and quickly if it's going to happen, and I guess that means VP Paul Ryan. Kind of a step down for him. If someone impeaches Trump meanwhile, like Rachel Maddow, who must be a branch of govt in the deep state by now... We'd get President Ryan? Or would they pull some cockemamie bullsh!t like they did to install Ford. (Applying that logic here would give us the canadian, Ted Cruz.)

It seems he always has a new document dump or some hint of information, whenever someone begins to question him or his motives.

His latest came in a pair of tweets on Tuesday morning, alleging that there was a plan in place to knock out Trump, in favor of Pence, and that Hillary Clinton was behind it.

In the first of a pair of tweets from an account WikiLeaks said was activited by its founder, Assange claimed that Trump’s 2016 presidential election opponent Hillary Clinton stated privately this month that she is “pushing for a Pence takeover.” He claimed Clinton views Pence as “predictable hence defeatable.”

But she has already been defeated, and she may try, but she won’t be coming back, so how is he, already in office, “defeatable”?

Quote:Vice President Pence on Thursday vowed that the Trump administration would "use the full force of the law" to go after those involved in WikiLeaks's latest document dump if the materials it released are shown to be valid CIA documents.

"Trafficking in national security information, as is alleged WikiLeaks has done here, is a very serious offense," Pence said during an interview on Fox News's "Special Report."

"It represents a compromise of the security of the American people," he said.

“This president and this administration will take that very seriously and use the full force of the law and resources of the United States to hold all of those to account that were involved," he added...
More

!? I thought this guy was smart. There's only one reaction here that would be legit. "This must be investigated" with a possible "I recuse myself, meanwhile."

Here's the problem, skipping the fact that Wikileaks has posted over a 10 million documents and no one has ever found them to be bogus, not even one time. (Srsly? 10 million documents, and not one phoney? MSM can't even make it through one document without lying.) and getting right to the part where someone just say "there's the perp" and your defense is what? "No I'm not!" If you really thought you were innocent, you'd wait for the loon to try to prove his case, not deny it and then ask the CIA to hunt him down.

So I guess that's a tacit admission of guilt. And kudos to Sig, the deep state theory is true, we have two CIA agents who are Pence buddies saying it, and Hillary saying it.

and sorry to anyone who bought that this might be a good idea (hint: it's not) It really isn't. Pence is very far right wing, whereas Trump is a moderate. So unless you want to pray the gay away...

What happens now better happen smoothly and quickly if it's going to happen, and I guess that means VP Paul Ryan. Kind of a step down for him. If someone impeaches Trump meanwhile, like Rachel Maddow, who must be a branch of govt in the deep state by now... We'd get President Ryan? Or would they pull some cockemamie bullsh!t like they did to install Ford. (Applying that logic here would give us the canadian, Ted Cruz.)

You're thinking Trump will oust Pence?
Then he picks a new Veep.
Or I'm not understanding your topic.

You're thinking Trump will oust Pence?
Then he picks a new Veep.
Or I'm not understanding your topic.

Well, referencing Sig's deep state koolaid, she might be right. Assange charged HRC+CIA are backing Pence to take over, and some CIA people close to Pence are involved. Pence said essentially "no i didn't" and then added "get that guy" which is like wearing his "yes i'm guilty" t-shirt to work today.

If I had someone in my govt. in such a situation, then I might want to look into that.

My question was sort of, does that mean Ryan becomes VP, or Trump picks. I recall a lot of times a prez has picked a new VP to run for re-election, but not this sort of situation. What does happen? If a prez could just replace a vp, why doesn't it happen all the time? why didn't cheney get the boot?

I assume this is about democracy, in a way that the ascension of gerald ford basically wasn't. But the ascension of hillary clinton wouldn't be that different.

if an investigation find what assange is saying to be true, then if that implicates pence's willing involvement in a deep state coup, i assume pence would resign. does trump just pick someone, or does it go to paul ryan?

ETA2: this is bugging me. the media keeps saying "assange has broken the law" um, assange is an australian citizen living in the uk, afaik has never been to the us. I don't think they're clear on the concept of 'law' here.

You're thinking Trump will oust Pence?
Then he picks a new Veep.
Or I'm not understanding your topic.

Well, referencing Sig's deep state koolaid, she might be right. Assange charged HRC+CIA are backing Pence to take over, and some CIA people close to Pence are involved. Pence said essentially "no i didn't" and then added "get that guy" which is like wearing his "yes i'm guilty" t-shirt to work today.

If I had someone in my govt. in such a situation, then I might want to look into that.

My question was sort of, does that mean Ryan becomes VP, or Trump picks. I recall a lot of times a prez has picked a new VP to run for re-election, but not this sort of situation. What does happen? If a prez could just replace a vp, why doesn't it happen all the time? why didn't cheney get the boot?

I assume this is about democracy, in a way that the ascension of gerald ford basically wasn't. But the ascension of hillary clinton wouldn't be that different.

if an investigation find what assange is saying to be true, then if that implicates pence's willing involvement in a deep state coup, i assume pence would resign. does trump just pick someone, or does it go to paul ryan?

ETA2: this is bugging me. the media keeps saying "assange has broken the law" um, assange is an australian citizen living in the uk, afaik has never been to the us. I don't think they're clear on the concept of 'law' here.

You're thinking Trump will oust Pence?
Then he picks a new Veep.
Or I'm not understanding your topic.

Well, referencing Sig's deep state koolaid, she might be right. Assange charged HRC+CIA are backing Pence to take over, and some CIA people close to Pence are involved. Pence said essentially "no i didn't" and then added "get that guy" which is like wearing his "yes i'm guilty" t-shirt to work today.

If I had someone in my govt. in such a situation, then I might want to look into that.

My question was sort of, does that mean Ryan becomes VP, or Trump picks. I recall a lot of times a prez has picked a new VP to run for re-election, but not this sort of situation. What does happen? If a prez could just replace a vp, why doesn't it happen all the time? why didn't cheney get the boot?

I assume this is about democracy, in a way that the ascension of gerald ford basically wasn't. But the ascension of hillary clinton wouldn't be that different.

if an investigation find what assange is saying to be true, then if that implicates pence's willing involvement in a deep state coup, i assume pence would resign. does trump just pick someone, or does it go to paul ryan?

ETA2: this is bugging me. the media keeps saying "assange has broken the law" um, assange is an australian citizen living in the uk, afaik has never been to the us. I don't think they're clear on the concept of 'law' here.

All FIREFLY graphics and photos on this page are copyright 2002-2012 Mutant Enemy, Inc., Universal Pictures, and 20th Century Fox.
All other graphics and texts are copyright of the contributors to this website.
This website IS NOT affiliated with the Official Firefly Site, Mutant Enemy, Inc., or 20th Century Fox.