Friday, February 3, 2017

“Pizzagate” is the term given to speculations and assertions that there is a pedophile network connecting Democratic Party élites and two Washington, D.C. pizzerias, Besta Pizza and Comet Ping Pong. The latter is a Disneyish pizzeria owned by a homosexual named James Alefantis, who is a former boyfriend of David Brock, a Democratic Party operative and Clinton loyalist.

The word “pizza” in Pizzagate isn’t just a reference to Comet Ping Pong pizzeria but stems from the many cryptic references to “pizza” and other food items (“hotdogs”; “pasta”; “tempting” “cheeses”; “yummy” “sauces”) in a collection of curious emails sent by and to John Podesta, a longtime Democratic Party operative who was White House chief of staff in Bill Clinton’s administration, White House counselor in the Obama administration and, most recently, chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Some say the references to “pizza” and “hotdogs” are code words used by pedophiles; others dismiss the claim and would have us instead believe that powerful and very busy D. C. élites spend their time incessantly chatting about pizzas in emails. One of the parties in those Podesta emails is James Alefantis who, though the “lowly” owner of a D.C. pizza joint, is considered the 49th most powerful person in Washington, DC.

That there are pedophiles in Washington, D.C. is not farfetched given the Franklin child sex-ring scandal of 1988-1991 which involved GOP élites in Washington, D.C., and Nebraska’s Boys Town and assorted prominent citizens. The scandal is documented in two books:

Then there is the more recent case of former Congressman and House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Illinois) who, in April 2016 at his sentencing hearing, admitted under pressure from the judge that he had sexually abused boys. The judge in the case called Hastert a “serial child molester” and imposed a sentence of 15 months in prison, two years’ supervised release, and a $250,000 fine.

You would think that claims as incendiary as Pizzagate would warrant investigation by the D.C. police and the supposed “investigative” journalists of the MSM. Certainly, if the allegations were about Donald Trump or Republican élites, you can be sure WashingtonPost/NewYorkTimes/CNN/ABC/CBS/NBC would have reporters crawling over this story ad nauseum.

Even more curious is the fact that some big names in the Alternative Media treat Pizzagate like it’s a leprous contagion.

Wayne Madsen, who touts himself as America’s premier “independent investigative journalist,” not only has not investigated and continues to refuse to look into Pizzagate, when asked by a reader why, responded with Alinskyite ridicule and insults, calling pizzagate “fake news” and those who blog and YouTube about it “crazy conspiracists” who do “a great disservice to those reporters” like the great Wayne Madsen “who have been investigating actual criminal conspiracies involving pedophiles.”

“The so-called ‘Pizzagate’ story had problems from the outset of its genesis on a few dubious websites. The vacuous story falsely claimed that the pizzeria was engaged in a pedophile operation with John Podesta, Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager and former White House chief of staff for Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.”

In the chat forum with his subscribers about his post, Madsen redoubles his derision, calling Pizzagate a “phony” “100% bullcrap” “fake story” concocted by “fallacious conspiracy-mongering” “malicious” and “libelous” “fabulists”. To a faithful reader Will Shanley who doggedly asked Madsen why he’s avoiding Pizzagate, Madsen replied with more ridicule:

“This story is so fake the tabloids won’t even touch it. Concentrate on something more authentic, like Elvis’s three-headed alien baby.”

Even Alex Jones and his InfoWars shied away from Pizzagate. As Oscar Platt, who says the Pizzagate story has “definitely something to it,” recounts for Russia Insider, January 19, 2017:

Alex Jones publicly dropped his coverage of it. He has the resources and the audience to break the story wide open. Jones even created a special video explaining to his audience his logic for dropping his investigation, and then another one to explain why Infowars team member Joe Biggs, who was very active investigating Pizzagate, left the company.

Given the reluctance of both the MSM and AltMedia big shots like Jones and Madsen to investigate and report on Pizzagate, it was a breath of fresh air when a member of the MSM produced a TV report on the subject.

He is Ben Swann, an award-winning reporter and anchorman of CBS affiliate WGCL (CBS46) in Atlanta, Georgia, on which he had a regular investigative segment called “Reality Check”. Swann joined CBS46 as an anchor for its early evening and late newscasts in June 2015.

On January 18, 2017, CBS46 broadcasted Swann’s “Reality Check” report on Pizzagate, which Swann published to YouTube that same day:

As you can see, that video is no longer available, scrubbed from YouTube.

Fortunately, citizen journalists had saved Swann’s report, which you can see/hear for yourself in this video that, no doubt, will also be removed from YouTube:

There has been no explanation for his absence on air. His co-anchor Sharon Reed has been solo anchoring at times. Sometimes, Tracye Hutchins joins in, as she did Wednesday night. Internally, staffers don’t even know what’s going on.

Neither news director Frank Volpicella nor his boss and GM Mark Pimental have responded to requests for comment. A spokesman from Meredith Corp., which owns CBS46, has not returned email queries or phone call requests either.

It’s very possible the two sides are quietly negotiating an exit settlement agreement with Swann, who joined the station in mid-2015 and is clearly still under contract. And given that the story was cleared by his bosses, their futures are questionable as well.

Swann did one of his “Reality Checks” last Tuesday bringing back the frequently debunked story of a pizza place in D.C. linked to a Hillary Clinton senior aide that was supposedly running a child prostitution ring there. He noted that there is no clear evidence such a ring exists but threw out a lot of online speculation and innuendo, then wondered why the authorities had not done a thorough investigation….

He has not posted anything on Instagram since the brouhaha hit. Ditto on Facebook.

As Ben Swann, with eminent common sense, pointed out in his “Reality Check” report, how can Pizzagate be dismissed as “fake news” or “debunked” when there hasn’t been an official investigation — not one — into the many troubling claims?

On January 27, 2017, Ben Swann posted an announcement on Facebook and Twitter that “things are OK,” but that he will “go dark” on social media beginning “Tzuday, Feb. 1”.

Note that in his “go dark” announcement, Swann bizarrely spelled Tuesday as “Tzuday,” and identified Feb. 1 as Tuesday when February 1, 2017 falls on a Wednesday. Was this Swann’s way of sending out an S.O.S.?

On January 31, 2017, AJC.com’s Rodney Ho reportedthat “Swann returned on air Monday [January 30], as announced.I saw him at 5:30 p.m. Oddly, his mic was not working properly during an intro about ‘construction fatigue’.”

But as Swann had warned, his social media accounts have “gone dark,”as you can see for yourself. If you go on:

Swann’s TruthInMedia.com website, you’ll get a “401 Authorization Required” message, asking you to give your username and password, which you can’t provide because you don’t have one since TruthInMedia.com had never required your username and password before.

Sure looks like Ben Swann, the only MSM journalist who reported about Pizzagate, is being muzzled. So much for the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment declaration of a free press . . . .

"In analyzing any system, we look at the largest possible context, and at Sandy Hook, that would be the evacuation of 469 students from Sandy Hook Elementary School on the day of the massacre, December 14, 2012," Mr. Shanley said. "The only problem is there are only two official photos of the evacuation that day, one which we can prove was staged, and videotapes from three Connecticut State Police car dashcams that show no evacuation, all of which are from Connecticut States Attorney Stephen A. Sedensky's official report."

Shanley went on to say:

"Today I filed this motion to submit an amicus curiae brief in Soto v Bushmaster now before the Connecticut Supreme Court which proves Sedensky's official report of the Sandy Hook Massacre to be entirely fraudulent."

Mr. Shanley refers recipients of this news release to his attached motion.

For further information, or questions about the motion, contact Will Shanley

Comes now,
William Brandon Shanley, not a lawyer, but a son of Connecticut, a Son of God,
a Citizen Advocate, a filmmaker, broadcast journalist, editor of books on
Quantum Science, and media analyst with forty years’ experience analyzing
pseudo-events in U.S. Presidential Elections and Mass Events with a Motion to
Submit an Amicus Curiae Brief in the above-captioned case.

Shanley Background

Mr. Shanley's
relevant background includes making the documentary feature, The
Made-for-TV Election starring Martin Sheen (1986),
which introduced a new paradigm in news analysis by isolating the role of 33
television-based, pseudo-events in the outcome of the tectonic
Carter-Reagan-Anderson election of 1980; media analysis work for CNN Executive
Management analyzing CNN, MSNBC and Fox News Channel coverage of the 1996
Presidential Election, the TWA 800 Explosion, Olympic Park Bombing, and numerous
other mass news events; knowledge of news gathering and writing since he first
began working in Connecticut radio in 1967 at age 16; writing news at CNN
post-9/11 and during the launch of the War in Afghanistan; and, as an editor of
popular books on the most advanced physical theories, Quantum Physics,
published in English, German and Japanese. (For more detail, see Shanley Credits.)

[Note: Mr. Shanley hastens
to add he is not a gun advocate, does not own a gun and when he was first interviewed about Sandy Hook by Huk Magazine, on December 19, 2012, he
believed the “official story,” citing the concentration of guns in America as
having given rise to the event.

For additional background
information about Mr. Shanley’s efforts to expose the “Sandy Hook Massacre” as
Fake News, see Mr. Shanley’s letter to US House of
Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the US Senate
Committee of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. While the letter
asserts there is no physical evidence to support the government narrative known
as the “Sandy Hook Massacre,” alternatively, the letter does contain a plethora
of physical evidence to support his assertion that the “tragedy” is actually a
series of pseudo-events, or simulations, which once publicized by “news”
organizations, took on a life of their own. This evidence is in the form of exhibits
from Mr. Shanley’s lawsuits filed in US District Court in 2014 against news
media for fraud, terrorism and obstruction of justice for co-producing the
psy-op with criminal elements in the Obama, Malloy and Newtown governments.]

Shanley Claim: No Jurisdiction

It is Mr.
Shanley’s assertion that State’s Attorney Stephen J. Sedensky III’s official
report is a work of fiction, an artifice designed to defeat the Public’s Right
to Know, to corrupt jurisprudence and to subvert the Constitutions of the
United States of America and the State of Connecticut in a blatant effort to
shackle the Second Amendment.

Incredibly, Mr.
Sedensky provides no evidence to posit that a crime was even committed at Sandy
Hook Elementary School: no causal nexus, no names of victims, no birth or death
certifications, no ages, articles of clothing, no school records, no documentary
records of any kind proving the victims are real or that they are actually children
of the plaintiffs seeking damages in this case. By failing to provide prima
facie evidence sufficient to posit that a crime was committed at SHES, and that
the evidence (Mr. Sedensky’s Report) is not what it purports to be, there is no
criminal jurisdiction for the courts to hear this case, and the court has no
other choice than to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ complaint.

As it relates to
authentication, this section operates in conjunction with Section 1-1 (d) (2)
and Article IX of the Code. The preliminary issue, decided by the court, iswhether the
proponent has offered a satisfactory foundation from which the finder of fact
could reasonably determine that the evidence is what it purports to be. The
court makes this preliminary determination in light of the authentication
requirements of Article IX. Once a prima facie showing of authenticity has been
made to the court, the evidence, if otherwise admissible, goes to the fact
finder, and it is for the fact finder ultimately to resolve whether evidence
submitted for its consideration is what the proponent claims it to be. State v.
Carpenter, 275 Conn. 785, 856–57, 882 A.2d 604 (2005); State v. Colon, 272
Conn. 106, 188–89, 864 A.2d 666 (2004); State v. Shah, 134 Conn. App. 581, 593,
39 A.3d 1165 (2012).

“On the morning of December 14, 2012, the shooter, age 20, heavily armed,
went to Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES) in Newtown, where he shot his way
into the locked school building with a Bushmaster Model XM15-E2S rifle. He then
shot and killed the principal and school psychologist as they were in the north
hallway of the school responding to the noise of the shooter coming into the
school. The shooter also shot and injured two other staff members who were also
in the hallway… In the course of his rampage the shooter committed a number of
crimes in violation of our Connecticut Penal Code. The most significant are
those where lives were taken and people were physically injured. In Sandy Hook
Elementary School, the crime of Murder under Special Circumstances, in
violation of C.G.S. Sec. 53a-54b, was committed twenty-six times and Attempted
Murder under Special Circumstances in violation of C.G.S. Secs. 53a-49 and
53a-54b was committed twice as it relates to the two individuals who were shot
by the shooter and survived. The crime of Murder in violation of C.G.S. Sec.
53a-54 was committed by the shooter in killing his mother.” (page 3)

Astonishingly, despite
his claims, Mr. Sedensky provides no evidence any of this actually happened.

No Causal Nexus between
Bushmaster and Bullets

In his official
report, Mr. Sedensky fails to present a causal nexus between the Bushmaster and
the bullets and thus fails to prove that said crimes were committed by the “shooter.”
Further, there are no fingerprints or DNA linking the shooter and the
Bushmaster.

Mr. Sedensky
cites twenty six homicides with the Bushmaster, however, on page 37, in
footnote 53, Mr. Sedensky states:

“No positive identification could be made to any of the bullet evidence
submissions noted ... ... in 5.56 mm caliber. The physical condition of the
bullet jacket surfaces were severely damaged and corroded. They all lacked
individual striated marks of sufficient agreement for the identification
process. The test fires also exhibited a lack of individual striated marks on
the bullet surface for comparison purposes. This condition can be caused by
fouling in the barrel of the rifle and the ammunition itself. The Bushmaster
rifle cannot be eliminated as having fired the 5.56 caliber bullet evidence
examined,” quoting from the 6/19/13 Forensic Science Laboratory report.”

In other words,
even though Mr. Sedensky states that “The Bushmaster rifle cannot be eliminated
as having fired the 5.56 caliber bullet evidence examined,” ballistics tests do
not show a match between the Bushmaster and the more than 150 bullets. Hence,
there is no proven link between the bullets, the purported weapon and the
alleged shooter. Without a causal nexus, there is insufficient evidence that
“the shooter” committed twenty-six “homicides” with the Bushmaster.

No Victim Names,
Ages, Birth Certificates, Death Certifications, or evidence the “victims” even
existed.

We will show that
the official report does not contain the names, ages, birth certificates, death
certifications, articles of clothing, school records, photos, family photos, or
any other evidence that 20 children were
the victims of homicide on December 14, 2012. Moreover, we will show how the photographs
that have been circulated by news media of “victim families” have been “Photoshopped,”
and the one death certification that has been presented, that of Noah Pozner,
is an obvious fake. Why would it be necessary to mock up family photos and fake
a birth certificate if these “families” were real?

No Grand Jury, No
Indictment, No Coroner’s Inquest, No Jury, No Trial, No Conviction, and a Made-for-Media
Verdict!

With Mr. Sedensky’s
report, we are literally thrust “through the looking-glass” into the Court of
the Red King and Queen of Alice’s Adventures
in Wonderland, wherein the foul-tempered Red Queen,
always in a blind fury, is quick to give death sentences at the slightest
offense, "Off with their heads!"-- a verdict before the trial!

In his official
report, Mr. Sedensky, a prosecuting attorney, usurps the role of both judge and
jury, and declares the case to be “closed.” Mr. Sedensky’s claim is such an obvious
perversion of jurisprudence that we are astonished that none of Connecticut’s
great jurists, newspapermen or women, news broadcasters, academics, or civic
leaders have gone on record since its publication three years to object to this
obvious miscarriage of justice by Mr. Sedensky -- clearly an act of tyranny.

Could it be that
the plan of the Sandy Hook conspirators from the beginning was to corrupt our
Constitutional Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances between the
executive, legislative, judicial and fourth estate to achieve their goals? To
subvert the People’s Right to Know? To invert the Golden Rule, “Love thy
neighbor as thyself,” causing neighbors to distrust another far and wide by
spreading a pathology of fear?

What Really
Happened?

So what really
happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES) on December 14, 2012? And why
were no med-evac helicopters called to the slaughter of 20 children and 6
adults, why were EMTs turned away from the bloodbath, why were emergency
protocols set aside and drill protocols used instead, and why can no one in
officialdom tell us who cleaned up the blood and human carnage?

“Nature Does Not
Lie”

As the late,
renowned physicist Richard Feynman has said, “Nature does not lie.”

But people do.

And as much as we
would wish it to be otherwise, unfortunately, we recognize that government
officials and news media have a long history of lying to the public and
conspiring to devise pseudo-events, or Fake News, to deceive the public – the
Warren Report on the JFK Assassination, the Gulf of Tonkin Attacks leading to
the Vietnam War, 9/11 WTC Bombings, and Weapons of Mass Destruction – are but a
few examples of official lies and deceits that have cost America and the world
trillions of dollars and millions of lives.

As such, to grow
and learn, we must finally recognize that “authority does not equal truth,”
but you wouldn’t know this from watching or reading mainstream (MSM) news in
Connecticut, in America, or much of the world, where only an official,
monolithic, mechanistic point-of-view is allowed.

As such, in our
Amicus Curiae Brief we will rely on physical evidence including photographs,
videotape, internet records, and documents to prove to the Court what is real
and what is fake.

DHS-FEMA-DESPP
Drill at SHES December 13-14, 2012

In our Amicus
Curiae Brief, we will provide overwhelming evidence that the Sandy Hook
Massacre was actually a Department of Homeland Security – Federal Emergency
Management – Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection
exercise in which no one died. Evidence supporting this claim includes:

2)evidence the school was abandoned after 2008 for biohazards and failure
to meet ADA requirements;

3) a photo of the staging of the “official” Connecticut State Police
photo of children being evacuated from the school to get “the best shot” that
screamed from front pages and TV screens everywhere, terrorizing the world;

5) the “Bible of Sandy Hook,” Nobody Died At
Sandy Hook, James H. Fetzer and Mike Palecek, editors,
Moon Rock Books: 2015, an unprecedented work of forensic journalism by six
current and retired college professors with Ph.Ds, one with a J.D., and six
other lucid investigators from US, Britain and Australia. This deep and broad
forensic investigation contains hundreds of pages of documentary evidence,
including:

·proof of Sandy Hook “victim”
fundraising websites up as many as three days before the “massacre”;

·Internet Archive records showing
no internet usage at SHES from 2008 until one month before the drill;

·official CTSP photos (released
under FOIA thanks to efforts of Wolfgang Halbig) showing an abandoned school
stacked with boxes;

·photo of government perpetrators
drilling “bullet holes” into the side of SHES;

·photo of drill rehearsal of
December 13, 2012 with CTSP Swat vehicle with State Medical Examiner Wayne
Carver II waiting for his medical tent to arrive. The yellow police tape is
already up, the flag is flying at full mast, yet, we can clearly see that no
windows have been shot out of classroom 10.

·It was on December 13, 2012, the
day before the massacre, that the Social Security Death Index first listed alleged
shooter, Adam Lanza, dead!

·FBI National Crime Statistics record violent
deaths in Newtown in 2012 as “0.” (Note: When Mr. Shanley wrote to the FBI
publications division to find out who provided the FBI with this information,
he was told, “the Connecticut State Police.” In short order, the CTSP released
their own report, showing violent deaths in Newtown as “0” with an asterisk directing
readers to a footnote: “Does NOT include 27 victims of Newtown Mass Shooting”).

·Evidence the Social Security Death
Index does not contain any “victim” names.

These are but a
handful of highlights from the mountain of physical evidence proving the entire
nightmare to be a horrendous, unprecedented fraud, a billion-dollar “act of
lunacy” by criminal co-conspirators of the Obama, Malloy and Newtown
governments, the news media and the fake FEMA families (“crisis actors”) who
were “astro-turfed” into the Newtown community over a period of several years –
some of whom, according to Newtown property records, received houses on
Christmas Day in 2009 for $0 when town offices were closed!

Clearly, this
“slaughter” of gorgeous little children was designed to stampede the public and
legislators into supporting the passage of laws and executive orders to designed
subvert Constitutional Rights. And it worked! Within 30 days of Sandy Hook,
President Obama signed 23 executive orders constraining gun rights and the Connecticut
General Assembly passed four gun control laws related to Sandy Hook in 2013
alone.

Only in Newtown?

How does one go
about getting a small town such as Newtown to participate in an evil lie such
as the Sandy Hook Massacre?

This is a simple,
as well as profound and deep question.

A simple answer
is fear: fear of government persecution, fear of being ridiculed, fear of being
called “vile,” as Lennie Pozner has called the hundreds of independent
researchers in the pages of the Hartford Courant for pursuing Truth and
Justice.

But Mr. Shanley
asserts that it is also a combination of Newtown’s unique history as the site
for the old Fairfield Hills insane asylum, wherein so much suffering, terror
and madness soaked into the water and radiated out into the populous, flora and
fauna for more than 50 years: lobotomies, shock treatments, patients
unwittingly injected with diseases and new drugs, reports of murder and
torture, Yale and Fairfield University CIA MK-ULTRA experiments, and sadly, sometimes
unwanted children institutionalized by loveless parents and the State of
Connecticut as a convenience.

Newtown is also home
of the International Church of Satan. Satanists, like psychopaths, feed off
human suffering. They worship the lowest dimensions of the human personality found
in Dante’s Inferno, Hell. Some believe that by raping pre-pubescent children, they
will attain powers from fallen angels and demons.

This same Newtown
ground today is the site of Garner State Prison for the criminally insane and
the Newtown Town Hall.

And finally, it
is the root of all evil, the “love of money,” millions of public dollars
broadcast throughout the Newtown region by the Obama, Malloy and Newtown
governments.

This inversion of
all the is Good, True and Just is not the end of the story but only the
beginning.

Twenty-three
miles as the crow flies from the Bridgeport, Connecticut grave of the creator of
the “Greatest Show on Earth,” P.T. Barnum, is the grave of Sandy Hook
Elementary School (circa 1950-2014), where now stands the new, $50 million
Sandy Hook Elementary School, a monument to the “Most Insane Show on Earth”
that will be remembered for all time.

In Conclusion

If you were from another planet and asked
to investigate the tragedy at Sandy Hook, you would ask “Where is the evidence?”
But there would be none for you to see. It is all missing or has been
studiously removed. All you would be see and hear would be TV and newspaper reports
filled with Sandy Hook Massacre family members crying (and parent Robbie Parker
laughing) directing you to their fundraising sites. But these are not real
families. To them Sandy Hook is a game. A game they have won so far and one
that has made them all rich.

But as you dug
deeper, and moved beyond the images, what you would find if what we found to be
overwhelming evidence consistent with criminal conduct: the destruction of
crime scenes (SHES and Lanza home); suppression of public documents; gag
orders; threats to, and imprisonment of, independent researchers; accidents,
deaths and disappearances of witnesses, legislators, and independent
investigators; falsification of official records; tens of thousands of hours
logged by state employees involved in faking events, orchestrating and managing
an on-going cover-up; fake gun control opponents; “show trials” to make the
simulation real – Soto v Bushmaster and Lewis v Townof Newtown; total MSM censorship and failure
to investigate ANY evidence that contradicts the official story; refusal of
Obama, Malloy, Newtown government co-conspirators to investigate anomalies, hold
press conferences or answer any questions to ensure that the rule of law is
being upheld and Public’s Right to Know is being honored.

As Mr. Shanley
has asserted to Congress, as well as Danbury Superior Court Judge Saban and Fairfield
Superior Court Judge Bellis (both judges denied his Motion to Submit Amicus
Curiae brief), the Sandy Hook Massacre represents the greatest act of treason
in Connecticut since Tories of New England sought to succeed from the United
States at the 1815 Hartford Convention. As for the United States the America as
a whole, it may represent the greatest act of treason since the Civil War.

The crimes of the
Sandy Hook conspirators are much greater than Watergate because they involve a
pathology in the psyche of the entire American government that must be
identified and brought into the light so remedial acts may be fashioned.
Otherwise, in Mr. Shanley’s opinion, our nation has may have no future except
as a Praetorian guard of totalitarian evil run by elite deviants and satanic
pedophiles who, from the People’s palaces and temples, misdirect the People’s
wealth to terrorize, herd and exploit them like industrial farm animals.

Let this message
go forth from Connecticut to the rest of the world: this madness must now end!
Thankfully, there is a new sheriff in town who knows the facts of life about
Sandy Hook necessary to drain the Newtown swamp.

Given the historic nature of this case, it
is Mr. Shanley’s request that he be permitted to present his Amicus Curiae
Brief to the Court both in person and in writing. In support of his brief, it
is Mr. Shanley’s intention to present witnesses who have spent four years
investigating the crimes of Sandy Hook:

Wherefore, in an effort to restore sanity
to the government of the State of Connecticut and the United States of America,
William Brandon Shanley respectfully submits this Motion to Submit an Amicus
Curiae Brief to the Connecticut Supreme Court.

s/s William Brandon
Shanley

_____________________

William Brandon Shanley

56 Avon Street #3

New Haven, CT 06511

williambrandonshanley@gmail.com

475-655-4575

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, William Brandon
Shanley, hereby certify that a copy of this Motion was delivered
electronically to the last known e-mail address of each counsel of record for
whom an e-mail address has been provided on February
1, 2017 to the following parties of record; and (2) has been redacted
and does not contain any names or other personal identifying information that
is prohibited from disclosure by rule, statute, court order or case law.