lordjupiter:Do you think I'm new to this and your "nyah nyah you can't refute me" taunts mean anything? I'm not wasting my time repeating myself or what others have posted just so you can continue to ignore it all and lob your own cut and paste grenades. You are a shill from what I can tell, and probably a liar.

rzrwiresunrise:I love gun threads. Especially ones where posters dicker about which type would have caused more damage in a massacre and say it's a good think he didn't have THAT one cuz then he coulda REALLY caused some mayhem!

rzrwiresunrise:I love gun threads. Especially ones where posters dicker about which type would have caused more damage in a massacre and say it's a good think he didn't have THAT one cuz then he coulda REALLY caused some mayhem!

That is the winner of all winners. A pity you don't actually win anything, but still... maybe subscriptions to 100 magazines of your choice? Except they'll screw up your order after the first twenty, so better move the amputee donkey porn right to the top of the list.

unyon:Olo Manolo: If the magazine jammed (as cheap drum mags are bound to) then how exactly is he wrong? If the magazine fails it's more difficult to fix that jam than just drop the magazine and put in a new one. It wouldn't matter if he had 1000rd magazine if it wouldn't feed, no matter how much more scary you perceive it to be...

If you can guarantee that every high cap magazine will jam, then I'm sure nobody would have a problem with those.

If they always jam, why would anyone want to buy one? And why would you care if faulty crap is banned?

I'm more of a suspicious guy with a gun. I'm like the guy with a gun in the rated R movie, you know, the guy with a gun you're not sure whether or not you like yet. You're not sure where he's coming from.

Olo Manolo:If the magazine jammed (as cheap drum mags are bound to) then how exactly is he wrong? If the magazine fails it's more difficult to fix that jam than just drop the magazine and put in a new one. It wouldn't matter if he had 1000rd magazine if it wouldn't feed, no matter how much more scary you perceive it to be...

Where precisely did this slack jawed imbecile mention this hypothetical scenario?

I suppose if the Aurora shooter had been aborted, that would have been a good thing too.

Hmm, I wonder... Let's say we make 100 round magazines illegal, so the next nujob decides to buy an illegal one or construct his own. I wonder if it's going to end up being more or less likely to jam than the commercially available 100-round magazines today.

I've never considered using poor craftsmanship as a way of expanding our purchasing options. Can we let people buy cannons if they fail more than 75% of the time? TNT if it fails more than 85% of the time? Ricin so long as most of the batches don't really have much ricin in them?

factoryconnection:dittybopper: Actually, you don't even have to be all that determined: Happy Land Fire Guy was mad at his girlfriend, set the entrance to the club she was in on fire. Killed 87 people (girlfriend survived).

Yeah; those happen all the time and certainly represent the latest in building and fire codes. That's why people keep bringing things up from the 50s and 30s and whatnot to show clearly that guns have no bearing on mass killing effectiveness.

Pretty weak for you especially.

I think you mistook the address, 1959 Southern Boulevard, for the year it happened, which was 1990.

Then too, we have the case of the 9/11 attackers, who used small knives.

If the magazine jammed (as cheap drum mags are bound to) then how exactly is he wrong? If the magazine fails it's more difficult to fix that jam than just drop the magazine and put in a new one. It wouldn't matter if he had 1000rd magazine if it wouldn't feed, no matter how much more scary you perceive it to be...