pallankam = cross-legged; which does not appear to mention the lotus specific style of sitting cross-legged. In other references to meditation and mindfulness other postures are mentioned such as standing, walking, lying down; which shows that mindfulness can / should be done in all positions, so lotus is not required.

alan... wrote:my main question here is which word(s) are "folded his legs crosswise"? do they definitively translate as "lotus pose" or could this just be instruction to sit with legs folded inward?

I think it means sukhasana (pleasant-position) or padmasana (lotus-position).In Indian subcontinent it is still very common to sit in sukhasana. I have heard that if one masters padmasana, it will help to sit for many hours without changing position. I persoanlly prefer sukhasana because it is easy.

David N. Snyder wrote:pallankam = cross-legged; which does not appear to mention the lotus specific style of sitting cross-legged. In other references to meditation and mindfulness other postures are mentioned such as standing, walking, lying down; which shows that mindfulness can / should be done in all positions, so lotus is not required.

In Maha-satipatthana sutta the Buddha mentions about sitting cross-legged only in anapana section. So, perhaps, sitting cross-legged is useful mainly for mindfulness of breathing, and not required for other types of mindfulness.

David N. Snyder wrote:pallankam = cross-legged; which does not appear to mention the lotus specific style of sitting cross-legged. In other references to meditation and mindfulness other postures are mentioned such as standing, walking, lying down; which shows that mindfulness can / should be done in all positions, so lotus is not required.

alan... wrote:my main question here is which word(s) are "folded his legs crosswise"? do they definitively translate as "lotus pose" or could this just be instruction to sit with legs folded inward?

I think it means sukhasana (pleasant-position) or padmasana (lotus-position).In Indian subcontinent it is still very common to sit in sukhasana. I have heard that if one masters padmasana, it will help to sit for many hours without changing position. I persoanlly prefer sukhasana because it is easy.

David N. Snyder wrote:pallankam = cross-legged; which does not appear to mention the lotus specific style of sitting cross-legged. In other references to meditation and mindfulness other postures are mentioned such as standing, walking, lying down; which shows that mindfulness can / should be done in all positions, so lotus is not required.

In Maha-satipatthana sutta the Buddha mentions about sitting cross-legged only in anapana section. So, perhaps, sitting cross-legged is useful mainly for mindfulness of breathing, and not required for other types of mindfulness.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion … ...He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.John Stuart Mill

what does each word translate to? do they translate to be exact instructions on putting your legs in lotus pose? or is there a word in there that translates literally to a pali word that has the definition of: lotus pose?

what does each word translate to? do they translate to be exact instructions on putting your legs in lotus pose? or is there a word in there that translates literally to a pali word that has the definition of: lotus pose?

Lotus = padma, paduma; I don't think lotus posture is specifically mentioned in that passage. Cross-legged is mentioned and lotus was the typical cross-legged posture of the time, but I don't see it mentioned as being a requirement.

I did martial arts for several years in my younger days, so I am very flexible, but I can tell you it is much more important what you do with your mind than what you do with your legs.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion … ...He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.John Stuart Mill

what does each word translate to? do they translate to be exact instructions on putting your legs in lotus pose? or is there a word in there that translates literally to a pali word that has the definition of: lotus pose?

Lotus = padma, paduma; I don't think lotus posture is specifically mentioned in that passage. Cross-legged is mentioned and lotus was the typical cross-legged posture of the time, but I don't see it mentioned as being a requirement.

I did martial arts for several years in my younger days, so I am very flexible, but I can tell you it is much more important what you do with your mind than what you do with your legs.

me to. oddly enough that's why i'm buddhist. i started martial arts and read a book on shaolin that recommended meditation to help your martial practice. i had no real interest in buddhism before this and i started meditating and it was so great i just kept going until i arrived here today.

i actually used to be able to do lotus but got kicked in my left knee many times in sparring and even more in preparing for a mock fight for a demonstration and now if i sit lotus, which i am still flexible enough to do, my knee will hurt for days and it seems to be cumulative which obviously is very bad!

so if the lotus pose is not mentioned in this instruction that cuts it out of a huge number of suttas considering this is one of the standard formulas used to instruct on sitting meditation. if lotus pose is not specifically mentioned i believe it's safe to say it's not required otherwise it wouldn't have been left out! probably any of the standard sitting meditation poses are acceptable as long as they are upright and the legs are not sprawled out or otherwise positioned in a way that wouldn't give a solid base for wakeful meditation practice.

Nisidati pallankam abhujitva ujum kayam panidhaya parimukham satim upatthapetva so satova assasati sato passasati = "Sits down, bends in his legs crosswise on his lap, keeps is body erect, and arouses mindfulness in the object of meditation, namely, the breath which is in front of him. Mindful he breathes in, and mindful he breathes out."

"Bends in his legs crosswise on his lap." Three things pertaining to the sitting posture of the yogi are pointed out by that: firmness of the posture; easefulness of breathing due to the posture; and the expediency of the posture for laying hold of the subject of meditation.

One sits in this posture having locked in the legs. It is the entirely thigh-bound sitting posture, and is known as the lotus, and the immovable posture too.

"Keeps his body erect." Keeps the vertebrae in such a position that every segment of the backbone is said to be placed upright, and end to end throughout. The body, waist upwards, is held straight.

"Arouses mindfulness in front." Fixes the attention by directing it towards the breath which is in front.

"Mindful he breathes in and mindful he breathes out." Breathes in and out without abandoning mindfulness.

Thanks for that, Dmytro; that is interesting. So would you say lotus is required based on that Commentary? Or just recommended? Other postures are mentioned in the Satipatthana Sutta.

I know of only one school, the City of Ten Thousand Buddhas (form of Chinese-Mahayana Buddhism) that requires full lotus. They insist that their monastics sit in full lotus or if they can't, to work diligently toward that.

Nisidati pallankam abhujitva ujum kayam panidhaya parimukham satim upatthapetva so satova assasati sato passasati = "Sits down, bends in his legs crosswise on his lap, keeps is body erect, and arouses mindfulness in the object of meditation, namely, the breath which is in front of him. Mindful he breathes in, and mindful he breathes out."

"Bends in his legs crosswise on his lap." Three things pertaining to the sitting posture of the yogi are pointed out by that: firmness of the posture; easefulness of breathing due to the posture; and the expediency of the posture for laying hold of the subject of meditation.

One sits in this posture having locked in the legs. It is the entirely thigh-bound sitting posture, and is known as the lotus, and the immovable posture too.

"Keeps his body erect." Keeps the vertebrae in such a position that every segment of the backbone is said to be placed upright, and end to end throughout. The body, waist upwards, is held straight.

"Arouses mindfulness in front." Fixes the attention by directing it towards the breath which is in front.

"Mindful he breathes in and mindful he breathes out." Breathes in and out without abandoning mindfulness.

lol, this is exactly what i was reading the day i created this thread. the pali in my OP is actually a copy/paste of that page. i was wondering if the pali translates like the commentary says "bends his legs crosswise on his lap", as far as i can tell based on what people are saying on here, it does not. but i don't know pali, hence the OP.

I doubt the Buddha actually meant only one specific posture, it seams strange considering he never mentions how to stand, walk, or laydown in instructions, he only mentions to use these postures.but just to note there is mention of how the Buddha lay down, walked... but to assume he was strict regarding posture when there are reasons not to adopt certain sitting postures seams to tight when it comes to here.

He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion … ...He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them … he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.John Stuart Mill