Oh dear (palm to face - shaking head - deep sigh). Here we go. Saint Stephen Hawking, that twin of the stiff from "Weekend
at Bernie's" has, by way of his magic "speech machine" or his handlers, been rolled out to chip-in
his two cents worth of idiotic Trump-bashing. The renowned mathematical masturbator, er, "theoretical
physicist" declares that he "cannot understand Donald Trump's popularity." Evidently, he, or his ventriloquists,
aren't so all-knowing after all.

"Weekend at Bernie's" (1989):
Two young insurance corporation employees discover their boss, Bernie, dead at his beach house. Upon learning that Bernie
had ordered their deaths to cover up his embezzlement (but with instructions to not kill them if he is around) they attempt
to convince people that Bernie is still alive.

Could the speechless Hawking actually be brain-damaged,
but kept "smart" for money making and propaganda purposes?

What's unusual here is that
Bernie, er, Hawking, although not at all shy about commenting on a wide variety of subjects, has never before
waded into the political pool -- or at least not this visibly. Clearly, his handlers and his handlers' handlers must be very
worried about "The Donald."

From the Slimes article:

"Hawking tells ITV's "Good Morning Britain" show Tuesday that he has no explanation
for the success of the presumptive Republican Party presidential nominee.

"He is a demagogue who seems to appeal
to the lowest common denominator," Hawking says in prerecorded comments to be broadcast when the show airs at 6 a.m.
London time (0500 GMT, 1 a.m. EDT) Tuesday."

Bernie's,
er, Hawking's speech machine, alleged to be operated with his cheek, also pleaded for British voters to remain in the European
Union in the upcoming referendum.

Said Bernie, er, Hawking:

"Gone are the days we could stand on our own, against the world. We
need to be part of a larger group of nations, both for our security, and our trade."

In other words, "educated" people support
world government.

Puffed-up
best-selling books and endless "speaking" tours --- The "smartest man in the world" in just a front for
a money-grubbing, multi-million dollar marketing machine.

The 74-year-old paralytic professor suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known
as Lou Gehrig's disease, that was was first diagnosed at age 21. In this pathetic state, we are told, the formerly mediocre student and notorious God-basher made the necessary calculations,
in his head, to "prove" that everything came from nothing, then condensed itself into a "singularity"
(a dense ball),
then blew itself up in a "Big Bang" about 15 billion years ago, and then blindly organized itself into the clockwork
Universe we have today.

The fact that neither the "Big Bang" nor the ensuing "Big Blend"
can be observed matters not to the sci-fi cult of Atheism. As long as complex math equations and computerized cartoons can
be rigged to explain away the evident reality of a creative intelligent force at work, Bernie, er, Hawking
will remain a man-god for the easily-impressed and oh-so-"educated" crowd.

Nikola Tesla, the greatest scientific genius of the 20th Century, warned us about "theoretical" math clowns
such as Hawking (and Einstein) years ago.

*

What Bernie's, er, Hawking's condemnation of Trump and support for the European Union says to the academic egghead crowd and
their fawning pimply-faced, high SAT score, low wisdom students is this: "Educated people oppose Trump and support
Globalism."

But to the truly educated and wise of the world, such as readers of The Anti-New
York Times, Bernie's, er, Hawking's attack on Trump is yet another reason to give "The Donald"
a try.

Saint Hawking -- who has neither invented nor proven a damn thing in his "illustrious career" -- is routinely
honored by the great and the good of the sick world in which we live.

*

Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read in the New York Times today that Stephen Hawking has come out against Trump.

Boobus
Americanus
2: That's not surprising,
given the fact that Hawking was named "the smartest man in the world."

"Like you, Boobuss, Hawking
iss nothing but a big frickin' dummy. But in hiss casse, the dumminesss iss both metaphorical and literal."

(Right on, Sugar!
Even before he got sick, Hawking was known to have struggled with Applied Physics, which is more challenging than Theoretical
/ Non-Experimental Physics.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

SUNDAY / MAY 29, 2016

A mural in the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, depicts
the relationship between Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin of Russia.

Your fatigued editor and his ferocious feline sidekick had just settled in for a few days of R&R at the still-quaint
and decent southern New Jersey Shore town of Cape May. Right on cue, this horrible piece of Globalist hate propaganda popped
up on the MSN Home Page.

Due to the fact that the
piece linked to Sulzberger's Slimes, and given the severity of attack, Mrs. King was asked to forgive us for doing what we
had solemnly pledged not to do this weekend, namely, write & rebut. But boy-oh-boy is she going to exact a heavy
price for the offense. Cape May is full of girly boutiques!

The duty of immediately rebutting what may be the single nastiest article we have come across since launching the
Anti-New York Times "trumps" (pun intended) whatever monetary damage the lovely, gracious
and extortionist "better half" may inflict as reparations for being ignored for a few hours. The hit-piece really
is that bad, folks. Hitler, Mussolini, Trump, Putin -- the whole gang is thrown together here in a Commie
comedy that would actually be funny, if its implications weren't so dangerous for the world.

Haz Mat suits and goggles on everyone, into Sulzberger's cesspool we go for a few choice
rebuttals.

Peter Baker:
(married to the Editor of "Politico", Susan Glasser (cough cough)): The comparison was inflammatory,
to say the least. Former Gov. William F. Weld of Massachusetts equated Donald J. Trump’s immigration plan with Kristallnacht,
...

Rebuttal:
Baker uses the journalistic trick of presenting "an inflammatory charge" in such a way as to distance himself from
it. As if to say: "It's not me saying this. It's former Governor Weld."

Peter Baker: .. the night of horror
in 1938 when rampaging Nazis smashed Jewish homes and businesses in Germany and killed scores of Jews.

Rebuttal: Baker omits to mention the fact that the Kristallnacht riots were
triggered by the murder of a German diplomat by a Polish Jew. Furthermore, the death totals are not clear and the arson attacks
really seemed like part of an orchestrated false-flag to embarrass Germany. --- But we digress.

Baker:
But if it was a provocative analogy, it was not a lonely one.

Rebuttal: Again, Baker is playing the dishonest game
of "It's not me saying this. It's others."

The vile
Peter Baker, his putrid wife Susan Glasser (cough cough), and William Weld are on a "Trump is Hitler" kick. Oh if
only it turns out to be true!

Baker:Mr. Trump’s campaign has engendered impassioned
debate about the nature of his appeal and warnings from critics on the left and the right about the potential rise of
fascism in the United States.

Rebuttal:
Of course, when Baker ignorantly speaks of "fascism," he means it as a bad thing -- you know, like evil "Nazis"
shutting down free speech and throwing people in "zee gas chambers" TM.

Baker: To supporters, such comparisons are deeply
unfair smear tactics used to tar conservatives and scare voters. For a bipartisan establishment whose foundation has been
shaken by Mr. Trump’s ascendancy, these backers say, it is easier to delegitimize his support than to acknowledge
widespread popular anger at the failure of both parties ...

Rebuttal: A fair sentence -- which means that
a "yeah but" is coming....wait for it ...

Baker:But the discussion
comes as questions are surfacing around the globe about a revival of fascism,

Rebuttal:There it is! The "yeah but" in all its deceitful splendor. Oh how well we know these demonic deceivers!

Baker:
... generally defined as a governmental system that asserts complete power and emphasizes aggressive nationalism
and often racism.

Rebuttal:That
is not the correct definition of "fascism" TM. The true definition of fascism
(non TM version) is as follows:

Fascism: The act of firmly saying "no" to Jewish-Globalist domination.
Example: "No. You may not issue our currency at interest." or "No. You may not monopolize and
subvert the news media." or "No. You may not force-feed pornography and homosexuality and tranny-ism to children."

Rebuttal: And what type of tactics did Obongo employ when he murdered Qadaffi, unleashed
deadly Predator Drone attacks on wedding parties, issued Executive Order after Executive Order after Executive Order,
and destroyed (by proxy) Syria and Libya. What would we call that? "Niceman tactics?"

Baker: In Austria, a nationalist
candidate came within three-tenths of a percentage point of becoming the first far-right head of state elected in Europe since
World War II.

Rebuttal: "Far right" TM is another way
of saying "fascist" TM. In regard to Austria's Norbert Hofer (who was
cheated) the non-TM definition of "far right" is: one who wishes to
enforce his countries borders. Example: "No Abdul! You may not break into Austria and rape our daughters."

Baker:
In Hungary, an authoritarian government has clamped down on the news media and erected razor wire fences to keep
out migrants.

Rebuttal: Hungary is attempting to contain CIA influence over its media and protect its citizens.

Slimes
Logic: Smiling in a man's face and then murdering him two years later is acceptable. But building a fence to protect your
borders amounts to "fascism" TM and "strongman tactics."

Baker: Traditional parties in France, Germany, Greece and elsewhere
have been challenged by nationalist movements amid an economic crisis and waves of migrants.

Rebuttal: The
"challenging" of "traditional parties" is actually an example of democracy TM,
not "fascism" TM!

Baker: .. Said Mark Leonard, the director of the European Council
on Foreign Relations.

Rebuttal: Aha! The Council on Foreign Relations!
A New York-based "think tank", with branches in Chicago and Europe, that more or less openly works for world government.

Baker:
“...Populists have replaced contests between left and right with a struggle between cosmopolitan elites and angry
nativists.”

Translation: "Elites" are worldly and wise. "Nativists" TM are angry and stupid.

Baker: Mr. Trump dismisses the labels used by those like Mr. Weld
... “I don’t talk about his alcoholism,” Mr. Trump said through a spokeswoman, “so why
would he talk about my foolishly perceived fascism?"

Rebuttal: Ya gotta love the fearless way Trump hits
back at these pieces of excrement.

Times article actually carries the above photo of The Great
One and Mussolini --- with the caption: "Some opponents have likened Donald J. Trump to Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini;
supporters call that a smear tactic."

*

("Some opponents have likened Trump to the big bad Hitler ---- not the "objective" Slimes, you see.
It's "some opponents" -- with the Slimes running the photo that will shock people and cause them to associate Trump
with the "evil" Hitler.)

Baker:
“This could be one of those moments that’s quite dangerous and we’ll look back and wonder why we treated
it as ho-hum at a time when we could have stopped it,” said Robert Kagan, a scholar at the Brookings Institution
known for hawkish internationalism.

Mr. Kagan sounded the alarm this month with a Washington Post op-ed article, “This Is How
Fascism Comes to America,”

Rebuttal:Robert Kagan(cough cough)?! One
of the neo-con 9/11 PNAC co-conspirators who wants World War III is calling Trump a "fascist" TM???
The chutzpah of these people!

Kagan, by the way, is married to Victoria Nuland (cough cough), the warmongering
douche-bag who helped to orchestrate the coup in Ukraine that has got us to the brink of war with Russia.

Baker: President Enrique Peña
Nieto of Mexico criticized Mr. Trump’s plans to build a wall on the border and to bar Muslims from entering the United
States. “That’s the way Hitler arrived.” he said.

Baker:
It got to the point that his wife, Melania Trump, was prompted to say, “He’s not Hitler.”

Rebuttal:Hitler. Hitler. Hitler.

Baker: Mr. Trump has provided
plenty of ammunition for critics. He was slow to denounce the white supremacist David Duke and talked approvingly of beating
up protesters. He has praised Mr. Putin and promised to be friends. He would not condemn supporters who launched anti-Semitic
blasts at journalists. At one point, Mr. Trump retweeted a Mussolini quote: “It is better to live one day as a lion
than 100 years as a sheep.”

Baker:
Asked by Chuck Todd on the NBC program “Meet the Press” about the retweet, Mr. Trump brushed off the
quote’s origin. “I know who said it,” he said. “But what difference does it make whether it’s
Mussolini or somebody else?”

Rebuttal: Ya gotta love a man with balls -- in a manly
sense, if you know what I mean.

Baker:
Beyond Hitler and Mussolini, fascism can be hard to define. Since World War II, only fringe figures ..... Hitler
and Mussolini were elastic in their political philosophies as they came to power .... Mussolini started out as ...

Mr. Paxton, the fascism
scholar, said he saw similarities and differences in Mr. Trump. ..

Rebuttal: Three "Mussolinis" TM, two "Hitlers" TM, and one "fascism" TM -- in a single paragraph wrapped up by a "fascism scholar" linking the name "Trump"
at the end. This is a fiendishly clever use of name-dropping and smear linking without actually accusing.

The high level of intellectual discourse at the "paper of record": Putin is Hitler --- Trump is Hitler
---- or is it Mussolini?

Baker: Others caution against comparisons. “I read Kagan’s
piece, of course,” said Volker Perthes, the director of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs,
in Berlin. “All the phenomena he describes are raising concerns, but I would still not call Trump fascist."

See the trick, folks? The
"debate" now is about whether or not Trump is a "fascist" TM. This is a classic example of "the art of the smear."

Baker:
Mr. Perthes said real fascism requires two more elements — an outright rejection of democracy...

Rebuttal: Like
when unelected bureaucrats at the European Union dictate to members states that they must open their borders or face sanctions,
eh Mr. Perthes?

Baker: ... and a harsher definition of order.

Rebuttal:
Like when the state shuts down bakeries that refuse to bake homosexual-themed cakes, or like when Germans and Swedes are thrown
in jail for complaining about the rape-fugees pouring into their countries, eh Mr. Perthes?

Baker: Charles Grant, the director
of the Center for European Reform:

“Historically, it (fascism) means the demonization of minorities within a society to
the extent that they feel insecure,”

Rebuttal: Like when "Holocaust Deniers" TM are rounded up during the night and imprisoned, eh Mr. Grant?

Rebuttal: Oh my God! Sugar, fetch
daddy a shot of vodka before I blow an artery in my head!

"Bellicose foreign policy?" Project much, Mr. Grant.
It is "fascists" TM Trump and Putin who want their respective nations to make peace!

The
same Sons of Satan who blow up innocent populations; imprison 86-year-old ladies for "holocaust denial" TM; and force women and girls to accept trannies in their bathrooms now want to
lecture us about Trump and Putin's "fascism" TM.

***

That's about the worst of this disgustingly desperate and juvenile piece-of-garbage article. The rest of it quotes
a few more diploma-decorated dickheads waxing eloquently about "the crisis" TM
of "right wing" TM populism gaining strength in the West. ...blah ... blah
... blah.

Let's just hope this
"crisis" TM continues. Heil Trump!

*

Boobus Americanus
1:I
read an article in the New York Times about the rise of fascism worldwide.

Boobus
Americanus 2:
Yes. Putin is definitely a fascist; and Trump may yet turn out to be an American Hitler as well.

"Oh pleasse God --- let that turn out to be true! Let that be true! Oh pleasse!"

(Well, I don't know about Trump being another Hitler -- but these hysterical attacks upon him really
increase my confidence in his intentions. I'm gonna hit the beach, Sugar. You stay here and relax in the air conditioning.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND / 2016

The beach-bound Editorial Board
of The Anti-New York Times will be enjoying some well deserved "R & R" for the next three days. Back in journo-combat
on Tuesday.

OP-ED BY

As we all know, Memorial Day is a federal holiday in the United States
for remembering the people who died while serving in America's armed forces. The holiday, which is observed on the last Monday
of May, originated in 1868 as Decoration Day.

Families of the Northern dead would decorate the graves of their kinfolk with flags and flowers. By 1900, competing
Union and Confederate holiday traditions, celebrated on different days, had merged into
a single Memorial Day, which was eventually extended to honor all Americans who died in military service.

Since World War II, the stupid cliche of "thank our veterans for our freedom"
was unofficially attached to the day. Of course, American haven't died in defense of freedom since the complicated and
nuanced Civil War -- with northerners dying to remain free of the dangers of a Rothschild-divided America; and southerners
dying for the right of state sovereignty.

So, this
Memorial Day, with all due respect to the veterans, let us dispense with all this "thank you for our freedom"
rubbishand declare a more historically accurate "gratitude" to the deserving parties (cough cough).

Sorry pops --- but with all respect
and affection, you and your buddies got played for fools.

*

1898: Thank you Globalists for the gift of the
Spanish-American War in which2450 Americans were killed so that the New World Order could establish a presence in the
Asian Pacific (Philippines & Guam).

1898 - 1913:Thank you Globalists for the gift
of the Philippines War in which 4200 American were killed so that the Filipinos, which you
promised independence to in exchange for rising up against Spain, could be kept under control.

1900-1901: Thank you Globalists for the Boxer
Rebellion in which 131 American were killed so that the Chinese could be kept in line.

1917 - 1918: Thank you Globalists and Zionists
for World War I in which 120,000 Americans were killed so that the first steps of world
government could be taken in Europe (League of Nations) and Palestine could be stolen from the Turks and their Arab
subjects.

Spanish-American War -- Philippines War --
World War I

*

1941 - 1945: Thank you Globalists
and Zionists for World War II in which 410,000 Americans were killed so that Germany
and Japan could be enslaved to the New World Order, and Britain eventually forced to turn over most of Palestine to the Jews.

1950 - 1953: Thank you Globalists for the Korean War in which 36,000 Americans were killed in
a rigged no-win war designed to maintain a permanent trip-wire between the two Koreas.

1965 - 1975: Thank
you Globalists for the Vietnam War in which 58,000 Americans were killed in another rigged
no-win war designed to drain and destabilize America.

World War II -- Korean
War -- Vietnam War

*

1982 - 1984: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for the Beirut Deployment in which 266
Americans were killed in a false-flag attack staged by Israel and blamed on "terrorists".

1990 - 1991: Thank
you Globalists and Zionists for the Gulf War in which 300Americans were killed so that the rising power of politically independent Iraq could be weakened.

2001 - 2011: Thank you Globalists and Zionists for the War on Terror in which 7000 Americans
were killed in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of a multi-trillion dollar farce kicked-off after the false-flag terror attacks
of September 11, 2001.

Beirut -- Iraq -- Afghanistan

*

"They
died to keep us free." eh Boobus? ---- ---- ----

We can best honor our dead veterans by exposing
the "who" and the "why" behind their tragic and premature deaths.

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: You're a Vietnam vet, right?

Boobus
Americanus
2: Yes I am.

Boobus
Americanus 1: Thank you for my freedom!

Boobus
Americanus 2: Your welcome!

"Hey Boobus! We lost
the frickin' Vietnam War!"

(Actually, Sugar, we the people lost
every war of the last 120 years. Only the Globalist-Zionist crime syndicate wins wars.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

THURSDAY / MAY 26, 2016

NY Times:Millennials’ Roommates Now More Likely to Be Parents Than Partners

By TAMAR
LEWIN

For the first time in modern history, young adults ages 18 to 34 are more likely
to live with a parent than with a romantic partner, according to a new census analysis by the Pew Research Center.

REBUTTAL
BY

One of the surest signs of a decadent and degenerate nation is its sick obsession
with measuring its relative success or failure in terms of the growth in GDP(Gross Domestic Product),
as if money is a guarantee of societal health and happiness. Apart from the fact that the not-as-important-as-it-may-seem
GDP can steadily improve even as unemployment, personal debt and consumer prices steadily worsen; the true
health and wealth of a nation lies in the strength, solidarity and morals of its replenishing families -- which in turn
depends on its spiritual vitality. With all due respect to our "lesser-of-two-evils" candidate, Mr. Trump, faith
in God and well-connected families are the only things will ever "make America great again."

Like a crucifix to Count Dracula, anti-family
Marxists and their libtard dupes recoil at the sight of Norman Rockwell paintings.

Today's featured Slimes
story reveals the tragic numbers:

"Millennials, who have been slower than previous generations to marry and set up their
own households, reached that milestone in 2014, when 32.1 percent lived in a parent’s home, compared with 31.6 percent
who lived with a spouse or a partner, the report found.

“The really seismic change is that we have so many fewer young adults partnering,
either marrying or cohabiting,” said Richard Fry, the Pew economist who wrote the report. “In 1960, that silent
generation left home earlier than any generation before or after, because they married so young.”

But in recent
decades, fewer people have been marrying, and those who do are marrying at older ages. In 1960, the median age for a first
marriage was 20 for women and 22 for men, and just one in 10 people over 25 had never married. Now, the median ages are 27
and 29, and one in five adults older than 25 has never married. In a 2014 study, Pew projected that a quarter of this generation of young adults might never marry."

But in some cases, he
cautioned, the grown children’s continued presence in the parental home can signal an inability to take the steps needed
to become real adults."

The
fruits of Marxism: Sluts, video game addicts and metrosexuals.

Economic deterioration is an important contributing factor to this dangerous trend of
failed-to-launch millennials -- not the root cause. If it were only about money, then how do we account for so many of our
much poorer counterparts in other countries maintaining their family structures? How do we explain away all the millennials
who do have good-paying jobs but still aren't married? What the heck is going on with this lost generation
of 35 and unders?

The engineered cultural shift has resulted in the disintegration of foundational institution of family. The
youth have been brainwashed to think that getting married and raising a family are merely "lifestyle choices" --
instead of civilizational imperatives. As this generation of "fun-loveing", unmotivated, spouseless, and childless 20-somethings and 30-somethings mature
into lonely 50-somethings and 60-somethings, there will be fewer and fewer younger replacements left to meet the
labor force demands of the GDP monster. Not to worry, dear reader. It's nothing that an additional 100 million imported
Turd Worlders can't fix. The sick joke of social liberalism / cultural Marxism is on you, White man!

You do the math.

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today that high numbers
of young people are living at home and delaying marriage.

Boobus
Americanus
2: That's a good thing. People shouldn't get married until they are
financially stable and at least 30 years old.

"Money -- money -- money!
That's all that matterss to you corrupted cretinss! If young people aren't married with kidss by age thirty, the oddss
are they will never have familiess at all!"

(Old lady Sugar had her litter when she was very young. Damn kittens don't even call her on Mother's Day.)

Vietnam may grant U.S. warships access to its ports, and Washington seems
certain to widen exceptions to its longtime arms embargo and may end it altogether.

REBUTTAL
BY

The last time that attention-whore Jimmy Carter
showed his stupid face and flashed his toothy grin; it was to announce, with great fanfare, that he had been diagnosed with
cancer. Unfortunately for us all, the treatable cancer turned out to be much ado about nothing. The pious phony and Globalist
agent is now cancer-free.

But the cancer of liberalism lives on and continues to be spread by Trilateralist scum like Jimmy "I'll
never lie to you" Carter. The Soros / Brzezinski puppet has resurfaced to warn us all about "racism" TM while bashing Donald Trump.

Have a whiff of this commie
crap, from the same self-righteous poser who provoked the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, ruined the 1980 Olympics for 1000's
of athletes, wore sweaters in the White House to fight inflation, established the Communist Department of Education, subverted
anti-Marxist regimes all over the world, allowed Castro to dump his criminals in Florida, and so much more:

"Former President Jimmy Carter, who has long put religion and racial reconciliation at the center of his life, is
on a mission to heal a racial divide among Baptists and help the country soothe rifts that he believes are getting worse.

In an interview on
Monday, Mr. Carter spoke of a resurgence of open racism, saying, “I think the country has been reawakened the last
two or three years to the fact that we haven’t resolved the race issue adequately.”

He said that Republican animosity toward President
Obama had “a heavy racial overtone” and that Donald J. Trump’s surprisingly successful campaign for president
had “tapped a waiting reservoir there of inherent racism.”

1- Carter's Department of Education has
since spawned millions of "millennial" morons.

2- The deadly Soviet-Afghan War was a Carter / Brzezinski
/ CIA production, not at all instigated by the Russians!

3- Carter's boy Robert Mugabe is still alive and
dangerous. The Marxist beast has destroyed Zimbabwe (fka Rhodesia) while oppressing Whites.

Not content with his ignoble past, agitator Carter is now planning
to hold a "summit meeting" in Atlanta this fall to bring together white, black, Hispanic and Asian Baptists to
work on issues of "race and social inequality." Said Carter of the "racism" TM
problem:

“I think there’s a heavy reaction
among some of the racially conscious Republicans against an African-American being president.”

“When you single out any particular group of people for secondary citizenship
status, that’s a violation of basic human rights.”

Taking a page out of the Pinko Pope's book, the "Evangelical
Christian" Carter defined who is Christian and who is not:

“The use of the word evangelical is a misnomer. I consider myself an evangelical
as well. And obviously, what most of the news reporters thought were evangelicals are conservative Republicans.

They have a heavy
orientation to right-wing political philosophy, and he (Trump) obviously is a proponent of that concept."

When Carter was booted out of office in 1980, his
approval numbers among Whites were as bad as Obongo's. So why does he assume that hatred for Obongo is motivated by "racism"
TM. According to Carter's logic, opposition to White Globalist liberals is political
-- but opposition to Black Globalist liberals is "racist" TM.What a dope!

Actually, Jimmy Carter is not a dope. This is the same shrewd cunning political shyster
who, as confirmed by his bodyguards, would carry empty luggage onto and off of Air Force 1 --- just to show Boobus Americanus
what a "regular guy" he was. Hopefully, Trump will crush this self righteous fake with one of his legendary lethal
"tweets". Lord knows St. Jimmy deserves it.

1- "Look at me everybody; I carry
my own luggage."

2- Let's hope
Trump takes a dump on Carter.

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today that Jimmy Carter
called out Trump for tapping into America's inherent racism.

Boobus
Americanus
2: Carter is a good man.
His voice of moral authority will damage the Trump campaign.

"If the 'moral authority'
of the commie Pope couldn't slow down the Trump Expresss, what makess you think thiss wasshed-up loser can?"

(Carter's pathetic use of the "Race
Card" will also backfire.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

TUESDAY / MAY 24, 2016

NY Times:Arriving in Vietnam, Obama Aims to Lure It Away
From China

By GARDINER HARRIS

Vietnam
may grant U.S. warships access to its ports, and Washington seems certain to widen exceptions to its longtime arms embargo
and may end it altogether.

REBUTTAL BY

Partly for the purpose of pitching the sovereignty-busting Globalist scam that is the
Trans-Pacific pact, and mainly for the purpose of building up the Vietnamese military as one of the NWO's proxies
to be played against China, messenger-boy Obongo kicked-off his Asian tour in Hanoi. After a three-day stay, he will move
on to Japan for the same reasons.

The article confirms
our suspicions thusly:

"President Obama arrived
in the steamy capital of Vietnam ahead of schedule on Sunday night to begin three days of meetings in hopes of luring yet another
Southeast Asian country away from China’s tight embrace."

"China's
tight embrace?" Oh the bloody drama!

China is being encircled by U.S. bases
and puppets in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Japan, Philippines, South Korea, and Taiwan

A few quick history lessons about "tight embraces"
for the people of Japan, Philippines and Vietnam are in order here:

HISTORY
LESSON #1: China / 1937

The U.S.
(and U.K.) "embraced" and offered pie-in-the-sky to Chinese General Chiang Kai Shek to
initiate a proxy war against Japan.

End
Result: China suffered massive casualties, mainly in fighting for control over Manchuria. Parts of Manchuria
were then handed to Stalin's control who later passed it over to Communist Mao Tse Tung. When Mao and his
gang, backed by U.S. Communists in the Truman administration, finally took over in 1949, Chiang and his supporters had
to flee for their lives to Taiwan.

The U.S.
"embraced" and offered pie-in-the-sky
to Iraqi ruler Saddam Hussein to fight Iran.

End Result: The war ended in stalemate after both sides suffered horrific casualties. The U.S. eventually
invades Iraq and murders Saddam Hussein.

1:
The 'Shock & Awe' Bombing of Baghdad, Iraq.

2: The U.S. engineered execution of Saddam Hussein

HISTORY LESSON #4: The Kurds / 1990's to Present

On several occasions, between 1990 - 2003,
the U.S. "embraced"
and offered pie-in-the-sky to the Kurds in Iraq: "Rise up against Saddam Hussein and we will
give you a State of your own after we have removed him from power."

End Result:When the Kurds rose up during Gulf War
I, the U.S. pulled the rug out from under them, allowing the defeated Saddam to stay in power
and crush the rebellion. During Gulf War II, the gullible Kurds were again promised a State after
the overthrow of Saddam, this time by Bush the Younger.

Knuckle-headed Kurds; played for fools repeatedly - and proud of
it!

Charlie
Kurd will always fall for the "statehood" trick.

A word of advice to Vietnam, Philippines, Japan and South Korea. Beware the
American "embrace." Whatever poisoned pie-in-the-sky that Obongo is offering you to provoke mighty China: you would
be wise to spit it out now! For if the warmongers succeed in triggering World War III, it will be the people of Asia (and
Europe) that will bear the brunt of the hardship, while the soon-to-be-retired (we hope!) Obongo plays at golf
and sodomy in Hawaii.

*

Addendum: A reader writes:

"How the Hell can
Vietnam, where Agent Orange and unexploded ordinance still kills and maims, cozy up to their real enemy? Unbelievable, it
might seem, but that's the power of the zio-banking octopus."

Excellent
point!

Have the Vietnamese already
forgotten the horrors that LBJ's war inflicted upon them?

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today
that Obama wants to lift the arms embargo on Vietnam.

Boobus
Americanus
2: It's the smart move. We need
all the help we can get in containing China's expansionist ambitions.

"You stupid @#$%! I don't
recall hearing about Chinesse basess in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Ssea? Do you?"

(Only the 'exceptional nation' maintains the privilege of encircling other nations
with bases and missiles.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

MONDAY / MAY 23, 2016

A cross that had been torn down by Chinese government
workers at a Protestant church in the village of Taitou in Zhejiang Province last year.

NY Times:Decapitated Churches in China’s Christian Heartland

By IAN JOHNSON

REBUTTAL
BY

Even without the obligation to publish The Anti-New York Times, the Holy
Hatred which your intrepid reporter and his fearless feline sidekick have for Sulzberger's Slimes wouldn't prevent us from
perusing its putrid propaganda-plagued pages for news each day.

That's because, believe it or not, there are and have always been many gold nuggets of solid
information that can be dredged up from out of the Marxist manure. Readers of 'The Bad War', by yours truly, and 'Planet Rothschild', also by yours truly, will note some of the amazing items of hard
data dug up from old issues. Yes, for those wise to "the
big picture" and well-schooled in the philosophical art of sifting facts from spin, The Slimes, can be an excellent
source of daily data.

This
particular article represents a perfect illustration of a propaganda hit-piece which, in spite of its nasty spin, is chock-full
of interesting 'limited hangout' factoids that actually contradict the general narrative of a repressive, anti-Christian China.
Hazmat suits on, everybody. Let's unspin the spin, as we dig up some gold nuggets of hard data from the seditious cesspool
of "Pulitzer Prize winning" (barf) reporter Ian Johnson.

Data Nugget: The one-time Atheistic tyranny now has a "Christian
Heartland", eh? That is actually very encouraging news to hear -- and will come as a pleasant shock to many Americans.
Thanks for the data, Johnson.

Johnson: Along the valleys and
mountains hugging the East China Sea, a Chinese government campaign to remove crosses from church spires has left the countryside
looking as if a typhoon had raged down the coast, decapitating buildings at random.

Rebuttal: "as if a typhoon
had raged" -- ''decapitating buildings" -- Oh the bloody exaggerated Yellow Journalistic drama! And a lie of omission
to boot! As Johnson himself will later reveal, the "government campaign" is only a local one -- entirely about zoning
ordinances governing the height of buildings. Overly bureaucratic regulators? Maybe. Religious persecution - not at all!

Johnson:
On a four-day journey through this lush swath of China’s Zhejiang Province, I spoke with
residents who described in new detail the breathtaking scale of an effort to remove Christianity’s most potent symbol
from public view.

Rebuttal: From whence this sudden love and concern for Christianity by the Jew York Slimes?

Like Count Dracula, Sulzberger recoils at the sight of a crucifix. Why is The Slimes suddenly so concerned
about the removal of crosses in China? (Note the Star of David worn by Bela Lugosi in the original Count
Dracula - 1931)

Johnson: Over the past two years,
officials and residents said...

Rebuttal: Unnamed "officials and residents" -- impossible to verify.

Johnson: ... the authorities have
torn down crosses from 1,200 to 1,700 churches.

Data
Nugget:"1,200 to 1,700 churches" in a single province?! That means that Christianity must be
sweeping across China. Thanks for the data, Johnson.

Johnson: “It’s been
very difficult to deal with,” said one church elder in Shuitou, who like others asked for anonymity in fear of retaliation
by the authorities.

Rebuttal:More "anonymity"
due to "fear of retaliation."
Understandable (rolling eyes). Of course, by clue-ing your fear-filled source as a "church elder in Shuitou,"
the big bad Christian-persecuting Chinese can now close-in on who is talking to the banned New York Times. Oops!

Johnson: The
campaign has been limited to Zhejiang Province ...

Data Nugget:So, out of China's
34 provincial-level administrative units (23 provinces, 4 municipalities , 5 autonomous regions and 2
special administrative region) -- the "decapitations" of church steeples / crosses has only occurred in one province.
Like we said earlier, a regional regulatory policy -- not a national persecution. Thanks for the data, Johnson.

All towns
have ordinances. In Victorian Cape May, NJ, all homes in the historic section must retain painted wooden
exteriors - no brick-face or aluminum siding.

Johnson: But people familiar with the government’s deliberations ...

Rebuttal:
What "people" -- dickhead! New York-based "analysts"? The Council on Foreign Relations? Your imaginary
friends in China? You haven't cited a single source yet, Johnson!

Johnson: ... say the removal of
crosses here has set the stage for a new, nationwide effort to more strictly regulate spiritual life in China ...

Rebuttal:
Let us know when China starts closing down Christian-owned bakeries, Christian photographers and Christian florists
for refusing to service sodomite weddings.

Johnson: In a major speech on religious policy last month, Mr. Xi urged the ruling
Communist Party to “resolutely guard against overseas infiltrations via religious means,”

Data Nugget: The
Chinese government believes that the CIA uses churches and missionaries as fronts for subversive activities. Thanks for the data, Johnson.

Johnson: In recent decades, the party had tolerated a religious renaissance in China, allowing
most Chinese to worship as they chose and even encouraging the construction of churches, mosques and temples

Rebuttal: The reason for the
"crackdowns" on "unregistered congregations"
and Falun Gong is because they are CIA fronts. What Johnson ignores is the fact that 99% of spiritual groups and churches
are not experiencing "crackdowns."

1-
The CIA uses propaganda and phony religious leaders such as the Dalai Lama to attack foreign governments

2- A 'Limited Hangout'
from the New York Times: 1977: 'A Worldwide Network for Dissemination of Propaganda Was Built by the C.I.A."
--- Thanks for the data, Times! (here)

Johnson: Hundreds of millions
of people have embraced the nation’s major faiths: Buddhism, Taoism, Islam and Christianity. There are now about 60
million Christians in China.

Rebuttal: "Hundreds of millions of people" have turned spiritual?
-- "60 million Christians" -- WOW! Old Mao must be rolling over in his grave! Thanks
for the data, Johnson.

Johnson: But Mr. Xi’s decision to convene a “religious affairs work conference”
last month suggested that he was unhappy with some of these policies.

Rebuttal: No, Johnson. What it
"suggests" is that Xi takes the threat of CIA-NGO penetration-via-religion very seriously --- as he should, as he
better!

Johnson:
People familiar with the party’s discussions ...

Rebuttal: What "people?" Name them, dammit!

Johnson:
... say it intends to apply some lessons from the campaign in Zhejiang to rein in religious groups across the country.

Rebuttal:
Zhejiang is about local zoning laws. What Xi is concerned about is the CIA. Do not mix the two issues, Johnson.

Johnson:
While the government is unlikely to begin tearing down crosses across China, the sources say,

Rebuttal: And
yet again with this imaginary ranting about what, "sources say!"

The "anonymous
sources" of Ian Johnson's imagination.

Johnson:
local authorities are expected to begin scrutinizing the finances and foreign ties of churches

Data Nugget: The
Chinese are concerned about "finances and foreign ties" of certain churches. Thanks for the data, Johnson.

Johnson: The government said that it was enforcing building codes and that all structures
had been affected, not just churches.

Data Nugget: Again, the article informs us that the "decapitation"
announced with such so breathless fanfare in the headline is only about local building codes in a single province. Thanks for the data, Johnson.

Johnson: But documents reviewed by The New York
Times ... show that provincial officials were worried that churches had begun to dominate the region’s skyline.

Rebuttal:
Oooooh --- "documents reviewed by The
New York Times." Sounds so authoritative, doesn't it? Because we all know how well "the paper of record"
interprets documents. (rolling eyes)

Johnson: ... show that provincial officials were worried that churches
had begun to dominate the region’s skyline.

Data Nugget: Again, the removal of high crosses is
all about a local regulatory policy governing building heights. The same type of regs are common in America too. Thanks for the data, Johnson.

Johnson: “It was quiet late last year,”
one local Christian said, “but the government is now making it clear that all of the crosses will go.”

Rebuttal:
Yet another "anonymous" Christian.

Johnson: In February, a prominent lawyer was shown on state television confessing
to having colluded with foreign forces, especially American organizations, to stir up local Christians. The lawyer, Zhang
Kai, had been in Zhejiang providing legal advice to churches that opposed the removal of their crosses.

Data Nugget: A
"human rights" lawyer confessed to working with the CIA to stir up trouble in the churches. Thanks for the data, Johnson. (I know. I know. He must have been tortured
into confession.)

Johnson:
“It’s easy for them to fabricate a crime and accuse you,” said the pastor of a large unregistered church
in Wenzhou. “We have to be very careful.”

Rebuttal: Another "anonymous" pastor, given
away by Johnson's clue (large unregistered
church in Wenzhou).

Johnson: “More than three decades ago, we didn’t even have a church,” he said.
“Persecution in church history has never stopped. All we can do is pray.”

Rebuttal: My dear
Pastor Anonymous at the "unregistered" church in Wenzhou! If Christianity is being persecuted, then why has the
Chinese government actually encouraged (as Johnson's slipped-through data points concede), the explosion of the Christian
population to a stunning 60 million?

***

Sugar
and I would like to thank the "Pulitzer Prize winning" punk, Ian Johnson, for the important data nuggets that he
buried for us to find. Unfortunately, and Johnson knows this, most of the worshipful fools who kneel Sulzberger's
Slimes each day will never be able to appreciate their beauty --- assuming they can even notice them.

Some estimates put the number of Chinese Christians
as high as 100 million - and growing fast. According to the London Telegraph, China is on course to
become 'world's most Christian nation' within 15 years (here)

Telegraph:
"The number of Christians in Communist China is growing so steadily that it by 2030 it could have
more churchgoers than America."

"If
everyone in China believed in Jesus then we would have no more need for police stations. There would
be no more bad people and therefore no more crime." - Jin Hongxin

NY Times: EgyptAir Crash Blindsides a Nation That Thought
It Was Recovering

By
DECLAN WALSH

REBUTTAL
BY

Not long after General el Sisi of Egypt, in 2013, reversed the CIA's Arab Spring takeover of
his country (which had been accomplished via WikiLeaks, internal Egyptian 'assets' and the treasonous 'Muslim Brotherhood'
in 2011) and aligned himself with Putin's Russia, "bad things", said to be the work of 'ISIS' (CIA-Mossad)
have been happening in Egypt. The following headlines speak for themselves:

THE "SINS" OF SISI:

From Al
Jazeera (a CIA front):Putin and Sisi: A Fine Bromance: Blossoming relationship with Moscow is direct result of Cairo's strained
relations with Washington. (here)

And there are plenty more "bad things" that have happened to Egypt (and its important
tourism industry) over the past two years, including this latest case of an airplane falling from the sky -- with an
unusually low and cryptically Satanic "66" passengers/crew on board on the 18th day (6+6+6 / USA time) of May -- on its
way to Cairo from Paris.

The Guardian (UK):Loss of EgyptAir flight MS804 is another blow
to Egyptian tourism industry -- Egyptian tourism officials had expressed hope that sector might be on brink of recovery after
Metrojet disaster (here)

The clincher that really proves that we are dealing with yet another destabilizing false-flag
attack is the instant appearance of the usual hands-to-the-face "grieving" crisis actors loudly blaming the government
for the loss of loved ones. This is not to say that this latest Air Egypt crash, and so many others like
it before (Malaysian Airliner over Indian Ocean, Malaysian Airliner over Ukraine, Air Asia over Java Sea, Russia Metrojet over Egyptian
Sinai, German Wings over France etc) were
all faked. Though anything is possible, the crisis actors are used to add flavor to the drama and openly blame the targeted
government. Even the obviously very real attacks of 9/11/ 2001 witnessed crisis actors deployed on the streets of Manhattan.

Have a look at these current fakers:

George Sorrows pays $15 an hour for
a good hand-to-mouth dry-eyed crying act.

Once one has studied the game plan (read Planet Rothschild), the game becomes very transparent and soooo predicatable. As it was in Iraq,
as it was in Libya, as it was in Sudan; and as it currently as it currently is in Syria, and in Brazil, and in Argentina, and
in Nigeria, and in Venezuela and in so many other nations; the pattern is clear: defy the New World Order by cozying up to
the Russia-China bloc, and "bad things" will happen to you. Having
part of your nation (east of the Nile River) fall inside the hoped-for borders of 'Greater Israel' doesn't help matters
either!

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: ISIS has really been giving Egypt a hard time lately. Two downed planes and a hostage hijacking in just the
past seven months.

Boobus
Americanus
2: Maybe we shouldn't complain too much about those long TSA lines at the
airport.

"Hey %#$@ -for-brainss!
The TSsA goon-ssquad issn't there for your protection! It iss your beloved nanny government that is behind the plane attackss in the firsst place."

(Life truly is stranger than fiction.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

THURSDAY / MAY 19, 2016

NY Times: Block the Sale of Warplanes to
Nigeria

By
ANDREW ROSENTHAL, er "THE EDITORIAL BOARD"

REBUTTAL
BY

Andrew Rosenthal, that shadowy little Wicked Weasel
of Oz who poses as "The Editorial Board" is pontificating about "human rights" and
"corruption" in oil-rich Nigeria again. The Anti-New York Times dissects,
translates and rebuts the latest bit of Luciferian libel from the high & mighty illusion known as "The Editorial
Board".

Be neither afraid nor impressed by
all the smoke and noise. It's only a pathetic little word-smith typing out lies from behind the curtain.

Before we rip apart Rosenthal's, er, The Editorial Board's rubbish, a quick flashback to the April 1st, 2015
issue of The Anti-New York Times:

************

The 'Boku
Haram' terrorist scam worked! Having been blamed for failing to adequately protect his people from
the CIA-Mossad front group, incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan was defeated by the
Globalist candidate-of-choice, Muhammadu Buhari. The Slimes explains why Jonathan's 'goodluck'
had run out:

Boku Haram -
rigged by the United States! Falling oil prices - rigged by U.S. ally Saudi Arabia! Get the picture?

The
First Tranny's 'Bring Back Our Girls' stunt paid off.

“If they
knew where they were, I certainly would send in US troops to rescue them, in a New York minute
I would, without permission of the host country, I wouldn’t
be waiting for some kind of permission from some guy named Goodluck Jonathan,”(Nigeria’s
president) - John McCain (A Soros Stooge)

An article appearing in the Nigerian Voice titled: Is
George Soros Eyeing Nigeria’s Presidential Election? accuses the notorious Globalist
billionaire of targeting Nigeria for subversion....

************

Lo and behold, as is so often the case with these Globalist coups, the new boss may be asserting
himself and, at least to some extent, going his own way. This appears, as we shall see, to be the case in Nigeria, and it's
really pissing-off Rosenthal, er, "The
Editorial Board." Now, let's rip this filthy rat and some select excerpts from his "editorial" to shreds:

Rosenthal, er, "The Editorial Board":
Fourteen months after the election of President Muhammadu Buhari in Nigeria, the Obama administration is considering selling
his government 12 warplanes. ...

Rebuttal: Ain't that somethin'?
Nigerianeeds
to buy planes from the U.S. in order to fight the Boku Haram terrorists that the U.S. and its allies created and still finance.
That's known as "balance of power" geo-politics.

Rosenthal,
er, "The Editorial Board": Mr. Buhari is an improvement over his disastrous predecessor, Goodluck Jonathan,
and is fighting Boko Haram, the Islamist extremists who have terrorized the region.

Rebuttal: Here
comes the tail-end of a "yeah-but."

Rosenthal, er, "The
Editorial Board":But he has not done enough to end corruption
and respond to charges that the army has committed war crimes in its fight against the group.

Rebuttal: Nigeria is damned if they don't fight Boku Haram --- and damed
for "human rights violations" if they do!

Rosenthal, er, "The Editorial Board": Selling
him the planes now would be a mistake.

Translation: "We just put this uppity Negro in power
and he is still cozying up to China! No planes for him!"

April, 2016" Wow! President Buhari just recently closed a currency deal with
China -- intended to strengthen Nigeria's currency against the US Dollar. The two nations also agreed to terms for $ Billion
in financing for new infrastructure projects. (here)

Rosenthal,
er, "The Editorial Board": Under Mr. Buhari, Nigeria has cooperated more with Chad and Niger to fight
Boko Haram. .... The group’s depravity captured world attention in 2014 when it kidnapped 276 girls from a secondary
school.

Rebuttal:
Boku Haram is the 'ISIS' of Africa -- a CIA terror group that, along with the Ebola scam, was used to destabilize and topple
the previous President of Nigeria. Again, that's what the "Bring Back Our Girls" scam of 2014 was
all about.

Rosenthal, er, "The Editorial Board": While
violence is down and some territory has been recaptured, the group continues to attack remote villages and refugee camps,
and it is using women and children as suicide bombers. American military
officials say that Boko Haram has begun collaborating with the Islamic State and that the groups could be planning attacks
on American allies in Africa.

Translation: "Listen boy! We can take your rebellious ass down just as quickly
as we raised you up. You better straighten up and dump the Chinese or the CIA will reactivate Boku Haram -- and Ebola too!"

Boku
Haram and Ebola were tools of destabilization aimed at Nigeria and various other African states that are doing lots of mutually
beneficial business with China.

Rosenthal,
er, "The Editorial Board": Yet Nigeria’s government cannot be entrusted with the versatile new
warplanes, which can be used for ground attacks as well as reconnaissance.

Rosenthal, er, "The
Editorial Board": Since winning election on a reform platform, Mr. Buhari has moved to root out graft and
to investigate human rights abuses by the military.

Rebuttal: "Yeah-but"
alert .... "yeah-but" alert.

Rosenthal, er, "The Editorial Board":But the State Department said Nigerian “authorities did not investigate
or punish the majority of cases of police or military abuse” in 2015.

Rebuttal: These
weasel-worded-worms and their rhetorical devices become soooo bloody-damn predictable after a while.

Rosenthal, er, "The Editorial Board": To defeat Boko Haram,
which preys on citizens’ anger at the government,...

Rebuttal: Clearly, a veiled threat. The "citizens’ anger at the government" can be
turned on and off by the CIA-NGO as easily as a water faucet. What Rosenfilth is really saying is this: "You're going
to have some Boku Haram and flash-mob problems unless you start obeying."

Rosenthal, er, "The
Editorial Board": Mr. Buhari will need more than weapons. He has to get serious about improving governance
and providing jobs, roads and services in every region of Nigeria. Until then or until Congress develops ways to monitor
the planes’ use, it should block the sale.

Translation: "Mr. Buhari; you have been warned."

1 & 2
- Buhari seems to want good relations with both America and its enemies. That is not acceptable to Sulzberger's Slimes and
"the exceptional nation" that put him in power.

3 - Though somewhat dormant since Buhari was installed, the CIA's Boku Haram terrorists
and the Soros-NGO rent-a-mobs can be re-activated to full-steam at anytime.

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in The New York Times today
that corrupt Nigeria has been violating human rights in its fight against Boku Haram.

Boobus
Americanus
2: That's unfortunate. If we allow terrorism
to cause us to trample upon human rights, then Osama Bin Laden will have won.

"@#@^&
#!*&^!!! I don't even know where to begin in grappling with ssuch sstupidity!"

(You could try praying for their lost minds and souls -- but your
cult groupies didn't pay to hear that.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

WEDNESDAY / MAY 18, 2016

NY Times: Bank
Economist Picked for Brazil Central Bank Governor

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

REBUTTAL
BY

For
the past 3 years, The Anti-New York Times has been way ahead of the curve in chronicling and forecasting
the Zio-Globalist efforts to take down the 'B' in BRICS(see our most recent piece of May 13). In
this article, we learn that while President Dilma Rousseff is out on suspension pending trial, Ilan
Goldfajn, chief economist at the Itau Unibanco bank, has just been named to head the Central Bank of Brazil.

Slow down there, Sugar! With an odd "Portuguese" name such as 'Goldfajn',
I too am tempted to "cough cough", but one must always confirm suspicions before making positive assertions. Google
time:

From Y-net News, Israel:

"Haifa-born
Ilan Goldfein was appointed on Thursday to be the president of the Central Bank of Brazil. He was appointed to
the position following the suspension of Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff due to charges of corruption.

Goldfein had previously served as ... an adviser to the World Bank and adviser to
the International Monetary Fund.

Goldfein earned
his PhD in economics from MIT. He is considered one of the leading and most well-regarded economists in Brazil, has worked
as a senior lecturer at top universities and has published many articles. In addition to Portuguese, he speaks
Hebrew, English and Spanish. He has family in Israel and visits often." (here)

Sugar and the Church Lady ---
always spot on!

Goldfajn will announce the other members of his team after he is confirmed by the NSA-Snowden-Greenwald
blackmailed Senate (see May 13 issue). Handing the money supply over to this Globalist-Zionist is a huge move because
President Rousseff has been suspended, not ousted -- at least not yet. If Rousseff, who still has maintains a huge base of
loyal supporters, manages to hang on, the Israeli Goldfajn will be able to undermine her at every turn.

The Y-net piece essentially confirms
this reality:

"Goldfein said he is very reassured
by the corruption investigations currently taking place against Rousseff and other high-powered politicians and members
of Brazil’s business community, stating he believes that even if the resulting broad-scoped cleanup will be temporary,
it will nevertheless have a stabilizing effect on the country’s recession-stricken economy."

The CIA-backed pro-impeachment
mobs vs the 54 million who voted for Rousseff

Goldfajn / Goldfein wasted little time in condemning "corruption" and calling for tax increases. It will
be interesting to see how soon this agent of the IMF & World Bank starts undermining the competing BRICS trade bloc and
rival BRICS Development Bank. In due time, we may even see calls to resurrect the dead FTAA effort
to gobble up all of the Americas. That pernicious EU-type consolidation scheme was killed by Brazil, Argentina & Venezuela about 10 years ago -- which is why Chavez
/ Maduro (VEN), de Kirchner (ARG) and Rousseff (BRA), in spite of their leftish leanings, were/are all so hated by
the liberal New York-London J-Mafia.

As evil
as shady characters such as Goldfajn are, one has to stand in awe of the Tribe's tenacity and ingenuity. Oh if only the
J-Mafia would direct its cohesive talents and tireless fanaticism toward noble ends! But boss-man Lucifer wouldn't like
that.

1
& 2 - Good for the J-Mafia --- bad for BRICS (Israeli Goldfajn in image # 1, on right)

3- Like Dilma,
FIFA boss Sepp Blatter was also "scandaled" out of office for his chumminess with Putin.

*

Brazil must also pay for its love affair with Iran.

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in The New York Times today that Brazil's
new Central Bank chief is an MIT economist who is going to clean things up down there.

Boobus
Americanus 2: That's good. A stable Brazil
is critical for all of Latin America.

"You
deluded doltss! Brazil wass desstabilized by the very ssame gang that jusst appointed this #@$%& (&@!!!"

(An astute observation, Sugar. But is it really necessary to always close with such .... oh never mind. You're incorrigible
by now.)

Remember
'the good old days' -- as in just 3 years ago -- when the raging moral debate of the day centered around the "right"
of sodomites and butchies to get "married?" Yes, the year 2013 already seems like the Victorian Era of virtue, innocence
and downright prudery in comparison to how 2016 is playing out, doesn't it? What started out as a Reality TV stunt involving
Bruce Jenner's "transition" to Caitlyn Jenner has (by design) already progressed to Federal
bathroom edicts and routine stories and photos in the "paper of record."

The Olympic champion-turned-freak
proudly marched into Trump Tower in New York to exercise its "right" to pee while sitting down.

The speed of events is as striking as it is scary. The tranny revolution just began -- and it has already
been completed! Even the "fearless" Donald Trump, under TV interrogation, took a pass on trannies-in-the-girls'-room.
The next stop on the reprobate express -- bestiality, followed by pedophilia. Bet on it!

As usual, the conservative opposition
to this mandate madness has been mis-focused on that putrid pair of powerless pawns -- Homo Obongo and his penis wielding
First Tranny of a "wife." But the problem runs much deeper and is far more philosophical in scope than just a 0.something
fraction of sick degenerates clamoring for "acceptance." The ultimate goal is the obliteration of sexual
identifies and the institutions of marriage and family which logically and naturally flow from those God-given differences.

The formula
for happy and healthy society is not rocket-science. It begins with the complimentary differences between a man and woman. Out of those differences flows attraction -- and not just in the physical sense.
Men like sweetness. Women like strength.

Out of attraction flows marriage -- the cellular building block of civilization. Out of
marriage flows children. Out of the nuclear family flows extended families --- the basis of kin, community, civic groups,
churches etc. This tightly knit extended web serves as a moral, emotional, cultural and economic societal support structure
that functions independently of government.

The self-evident way of Nature
and Nature's God.

But for the Satanic control-freaks who wish to transform humanity into a global bee-hive,
the traditional natural family must go. Toward that end, the usual suspects have, over the years, promoted promiscuity, pornography,
cohabitation, adultery, easy divorce, anti-family tax policies, careerist feminism, emasculation and 'alternative' lifestyles
of every sort. The deliberate blurring of behavioral lines between men and women is part of an insidious plot that is just
now reaching culmination.

We are now at the point where many women have lost their natural attraction to the de-balled
girly men of today; while many men have also lost their natural desire to protect the hard bitchy women of today. The demonic
New World Order's final push involves the actual erasing of sexual identity, and hence, the emotional connection that triggers
the civilization process. The filthy Putin-hating bisexual "Russian" Masha Gessen(cough cough)
admits as much.

"I have three kids who have five parents, more
or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my
new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and
my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted
son also considers him his father."

Since
the days of Adam Weishaupt's founding of the Illuminati, down through the insane anti-family
rantings of Karl Marx, to the sexual revolution, to the sodomite revolution, and now, to the tranny revolution
--- the drive to destroy the nuclear family is accelerating in the West. Thankfully, the East sees it differently.

By MICHAEL
BARBARO and MEGAN TWOHEY

There is an old saying that comes from the sordid and seamy world of Advertising: "Sell the sizzle, not
the steak." Even for sellers with a high-quality 'steak' to offer, this is sound advice. But for mendacious merchants of Marxist manure attempting to peddle dog-pooh patties disguised
as filet mignon of truth, the old saying is an absolute commandment.

Sulzberger's slanderous case against Trump as some sort of woman-abuser is so pathetic that
it relies, by necessity, upon a giant Sunday-edition photo of Trump with a gaggle of beauties, an explosive headline, and
breathless prose that actually tells us nothing. To the easily-impressed libtards who crawl to the self-proclaimed
"paper of record" for their daily thinking instructions, the case against Trump comes off as "convincing".
But a closer inspection of the "shocking disclosures" turns up a big fat zero.

Shocking Allegation:Donald
J. Trump had barely met Rowanne Brewer Lane when he asked her to change out of her clothes.

Rebuttal: Sounds intriguing. Tell us more.

Shocking Allegation (Quoting Ms, Brewer):"Donald was having a pool party at Mar-a-Lago. There were about 50
models and 30 men. There were girls in the pools, splashing around. For some reason Donald seemed a little smitten with
me."

Rebuttal: A recently-divorced 44 year old billionaire "a little smitten" with a
super-model. Oh horrors!

Shocking Allegation:He suddenly took me by the hand, and he started to show
me around the mansion. He asked me if I had a swimsuit with me. I said no. I hadn’t intended to swim. He took me into
a room and opened drawers and asked me to put on a swimsuit.

Rebuttal: He asked her to put on a swim suit at a
pool party? The beast!!! Was the request made at gunpoint?

Now nearly 50, Rowanne Brewer is portrayed by The
Slimes as dishing non-existent dirt, with 'no beef' on The Donald -- but just 3 months ago, she spoke highly
and fondly of their time together.

From
'Inside Edition':

"It
was a wonderful time. It was a spark from the beginning. He was a gentleman. He was funny! In public, he had that air about
him but in private, he was a different person -- more gentle."

"Donald called my mother," she said. "He said, 'You have a beautiful daughter.' ... It made me laugh."

But their relationship was short-lived. Their jobs took them in different directions and they ultimately went their
separate ways, she said. (here)

Shocking
Allegation: Ms. Brewer Lane, at the time a 26-year-old model, did as Mr. Trump asked. “I went into the bathroom
and tried one on,” she recalled. It was a bikini. “I came out, and he said, ‘Wow.’ ”

Rebuttal:
He said "wow" ??? ---- Wow, that must have been very traumatic for the poor gal to hear -- especially as a super-model.

Shocking Allegation:Mr. Trump ... decided to show her off to the crowd at Mar-a-Lago,
his estate in Palm Beach, Fla.

Shocking Allegation: ... the 1990 episode at
Mar-a-Lago ... a debasing face-to-face encounter between Mr. Trump and a young woman he hardly knew.

Rebuttal:A model
who poses half-naked for a living was offered a swimsuit at a pool party, and was then complimented in front of a group --
is this the best the Slimes can dig up on Trump? And if the encounter was so "debasing", why did Ms. Brewer date
Trump for the next year?

The oh-so-modest Rowanne Brewer soon got
over her "debasing" (Times' word, not hers) trauma and dated The Donald during the early 1990's. In fairness to
Ms. Brewer, none of her quotes about Trump were negative. It is the writers portraying her comments as such.

Shocking
Allegation: The New York Times interviewed dozens of women who
had worked with or for Mr. Trump over the past four decades, in the worlds of real estate, modeling and pageants; women
who had dated him or interacted with him socially; and women and men who had closely observed his conduct since his adolescence.
In all, more than 50 interviews were conducted over the course of six weeks.

Rebuttal: The remainder of the article cites vague characteristics but
no real specific cases that one could even remotely regard as abusive. Sizzle -- sizzle -- sizzle --- "dozens of women
were interviewed" (no other names given) --- sizzle, sizzle, sizzle --- "In all, 50 interviews were
conducted" (so?) --- sizzle, sizzle and still more sizzle:

Big
frickin' deal? How is this front page, top/center Sunday news? How does this disqualify Trump from high office? If Sulzberger
and friends are concerned about Trump possibly putting some inappropriate moves on the Frumpy Frau of Germany -- well, they
needn't worry about that!

An Alpha Man since High School, with
an eye for the ladies. Oh no!!!

If this 'blockbuster expose' represents the worst that Sulzberger's Slimes can dredge up, then
it bodes very well for the Trump 2016 campaign. Trump's harmless dalliances with super-models will not deflect, at
all, from the abuse that the pervert-flasher-groper-rapist Bill Clinton and his filthy enabling
co-conspirator of a lesbian wife have inflicted upon countless innocent women. The Globalist Slimes won't touch those
allegations, but the surprisingly accurate National Enquirer has and, in due time, Trump's campaign will as well.

Trump has got the goods on the Clintons'
truly shocking abuse and subsequent silencing of women --- and no amount of Slimes nonsense will be able to counter Trump's
coming attack on the Clintons.

*

ADDENDUM: This just in -- from 'Politico'

"On Monday morning, Brewer appeared on "Fox & Friends" to dispute the Times'
framing of her account.

"Actually,
it was very upsetting. I was not happy to read it at all," Brewer Lane said. "Well, because The New York Times told
us several times that they would make sure that my story that I was telling came across. They promised several times that
they would do it accurately. They told me several times and my manager several times that it would not be a hit piece and
that my story would come across the way that I was telling it and honestly, and it absolutely was not."

Asked what the reporters got wrong, Brewer Lane said they
took her quotes and "put a negative connotation on it."

"They spun it to where it appeared negative. I did not have a negative experience with Donald
Trump, and I don't appreciate them making it look like that I was saying that it was a negative experience because it was
not," Brewer said."

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: The Times
just published a scathing expose on Trump's shocking abuse of women. He's finished now, for sure.

Boobus
Americanus
2: Wow! What did they find out?

Boobus
Americanus 1: I didn't actually read the full article, but it has to be pretty
damn bad to be plastered all over the front page on a Sunday.

Boobus
Americanus 2: Indeed.

"It wass Alekssandr Ssolzhenitssyn
who obsserved: 'Hasstinesss and ssuperficiality are the pssychic disseases of the 20th
cssentury, and more than anywhere else this dissease is reflected in the presss' - you #@&^%$ retards!"

(Just to be clear, the "#@&^%$
retards" part is Sugar's unauthorized add-on to Solzhenitysn's quote.)

President
Dilma Rousseff of Brazil remained resolute on Thursday, saying that despite the impeachment process opened by the senate,
she had been elected by 54 million voters.

REBUTTAL
BY

In an August 2013 issue of The Anti-New
York Times, published at a time when many of our blogging peers in the Alternative Press had fallen for the phony
mania surrounding the CIA-turned-NSA agent Edward Snowden; your favorite geo-political prophets here accurately
foresaw the NSA-linked chaos currently griping the 'B' in BRICS' (Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa).

Nice
work, Sugar.

Horn-tootin' time:

"If the history of the WikiLeaks "leaks"
is any indication, then expect the coming Snowden-Greenwald "leaks" to "coincidentally"
reveal damaging information about certain officials within the Brazilian government. (After-all,
doesn't everybody have some skeletons in their closet?)

The other main purpose of the Ed Snowden
scam was to make it known (in a "friendly" way) to Brazil's political class that the NSA had the goods
on them.An excerpt from Ed Snowden's full-page
2013 "Open Letter" to Brazil is very telling:

"Today, if you carry a cell phone in Sao Paolo, the NSA can and does
keep track of your location: they do this 5 billion times a day to people around the world.

When
someone in Florianopolis visits a website, the NSA keeps a record of when it happened and what you did there.If a mother in Porto Alegre calls her son to wish him luck on his university exam, NSA can keep that call
log for five years or more.

They even keep track of who is
having an affair or looking at pornography, in case they need to damage their target’s reputation.

American Senators tell
us that Brazil should not worry, because this is not “surveillance,” it’s “data collection.”
They say it is done to keep you safe. They’re wrong." (full letter here)

Be
not deceived by the 'I-am-on-your-side' tone of Snowden's letter. What the self-admitted "ex" CIA spy was
really saying to Brazil was, in essence:

Dear public figures of Brazil,

The NSA & CIA have got you by the balls! Do
as they say.

Sincerely,

Edward Snowden

P.
S. -- I'm not part of this attack. I'm just giving you guys a 'heads-up'. I'm on Dilma's side. Really.

How is that NBC's Brian Williams was able to get
to the "fugitive" Snowden; but NSA-CIA can't?

"Edward
Snowden, in an exclusive interview with "Nightly News" anchor Brian Williams, is fighting back against critics
who dismissed him as a low-level hacker — saying he was "trained as a spy" and offered technical expertise
to high levels of government.

"I was trained as a spy in
sort of the traditional sense of the word, in that I lived and worked undercover overseas — pretending to work in a
job that I'm not — and even being assigned a name that was not mine," Snowden said in the interview."
(here)

You see, the Snowden-Greenwald trick in
Brazil is a close variationofthe WikiLeaks take-down of Mubarek of Egypt, Berlusconi
of Italy, and others during "The Arab Spring." The recent "Panama Papers"
disclosure is yet another example of this CIA destabilization tactic.

Step 2: After the "sheep-dipping"
of the phony "whistle-blower" is complete, have him "courageously" dump a zillion pages of "leaks".

Step 3: Vilify and threaten the "whistle-blower"
without actually going after him.

Step
4: Instruct CIA assets in the target nation's press to call for an "investigation" of the damaging
allegations that oh-so-conveniently turned up amidst the volumes of leaks.

Step 5: Activate the flash mobs of foreign agent provacatuers, opposition political parties, paid protesters and idealistic college
student-idiots. Be sure to equip them with professionally made banners and displays --- including ones in English. Send the
bill to George Soros.

Step
6: Through bribery or blackmail, activate CIA assets in the target nation's government to call for an "impeachment"
of the naughty politician.

That's exactly what the Globalists
are doing to President Dilma Rousseff, and she understands very well that this is a brilliantly orchestrated
coup attempt. Rousseff:

"I'm
the victim of a great injustice. My government was the target of nonstop sabotage -- the objective is to stop me from governing
and therefore allow an environment inviting the coup."

President Dilma Rousseff's involvement with Putin's BRICS trade bloc has incurred the wrath of the
Globalists. During a 2014 White House visit, she was denied a state dinner and deliberately disrespected by Puppet-Boy
Obongo. This did not go unnoticed in Brazil.

Over 60% of Brazilians
do not believe that Rousseff should be impeached, but a gang of compromised politicians, armed with NSA documents,
continue to call for her dismissal. The investigation was triggered by information
compiled from NSA surveillance of Rousseff, members of the Brazilian government, and the Brazilian oil giant,
Petrobras.

The
purpose of this wicked CIA-NSA-NGO-Soros political coup is to collapse the South American cornerstone of the BRICS alliance because the Globalists cannot control it.
If Brazil's government falls, the BRICS alliance may disintegrate along with it. That's what Ed Snowden was all about; that's
what Brazil's clearly rigged 7-1 loss to Germany during the Football World Cup that it hosted in 2014 was all about
(here); that's what the Zika virus hoax is all about; and that's what the deliberate sabotaging of this summer's
Olympic Games (to be hosted by Brazil) is all about.

The Globalists will have a hard time taking down Rousseff's
popular government which, though left-leaning and probably corrupt to some extent (what government isn't?), has been
pro-business and pro-sovereignty. At the same time, the NWO is also gunning for Putin, Xi Jinping and Donald Trump.
You may want to grab a bucket of popcorn -- because 2016 is shaping up to be very interesting, and very dangerous.

*

Brazil's
excellent relations with Iran, in open defiance of U.S. & Israeli demands, is another reason why "the powers
that be" want "regime change" in Brazil.

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read
a piece in the New
York Times today about the impeachment proceedings set to take place in Brazil.

"Regardlesss of what this corrupt leftie chick did or didn't do, her real
'crime' liess in the fact that her government is a key component of BRICSs."

(If the Brazilian giant falls, it won't
be long before the Globalists resurrect their failed FTAA scheme (NAFTA on steroids) to swallow up all of the Americas.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

THURSDAY / MAY 12, 2016

NY Times:Obama’s Visit Raises Ghosts of Hiroshima

By DAVID E. SANGER

Most people in Japan believe the city was a victim of unnecessary
brutality, but for Americans of the World War II generation, Hiroshima is at the center of a very different narrative.

REBUTTAL
BY

Generally, when Sulzberger's Slimes,
and even The Anti-New York Times, speak of the grand history-altering event that is World War II, the conversation
centers around The Great One or the phony Holocaust TM.
However, if we may borrow a bit of parlance from the chosenites, we must also "never forget" that the official narrative
of the Asian / Pacific element of World War II is just as false, just as slanderous, and just as malevolent as the tall tales
of the events in Europe.

This putrid piece of apologetic propaganda attempts to perpetuate
the lie of the "necessity" for dropping an atomic bomb on the heads of the non-combatant women, children and elderly
of the partially Catholic city of Hiroshima (here) -- followed four days later by another bomb on the partially Catholic city of Nagasaki
(here). How conveeenient, as the "Church Lady" of Saturday Night Live fame used to say,that
the two most Catholic cities in Japan were chosen for the honor of becoming
"Holocausted" -- which translates into "burnt offering." Now who would want to do a thing like that? (cough
cough)

Let's clean up just some of David Sanger's
(cough cough) fallacious re-fried fecal matter about the "necessity" of these genocidal
attacks, shall we?

1- A badly damaged Cathedral in Hiroshima.

2- The Urakami Cathedral (centre) which, though mostly destroyed by the atomic bombing of Nagasaki, remained partially
standing with 8 priests surviving inside.

3-
Though Christians were just a tiny minority in Japan, they may have numbered as high as 10% in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
How conveeenient indeed!

*

Sanger:
For decades, visitors to the ghostly dome in Hiroshima that stands like a sole survivor from the dropping of the atomic bomb
there more than 70 years ago entered a world that mixed unspeakable tragedy with historical amnesia.

Rebuttal:
As we will see later on in this article, soul-less Sanger's use of the term "historical amnesia" refers not to the
fact that the bombing took place nearly 71 years ago, but rather to the belief, still held by most in Japan, that the attack
was cruel and unnecessary. In other words, the anti-bomb Japanese have "amnesia" regarding Japan's "responsibility"
for the war.

Sanger: The site, which President Obama will visit this month, reflected an almost universal Japanese
view that the city was a victim of unnecessary brutality — parents and children incinerated, thousands killed and
a generation poisoned by radiation.

Rebuttal: As opposed to the brainwashed, self-hating and de-balled
liberal lambs of manly Merkel's Germany; the Japanese have retained some shred of dignity and sanity. You see, unlike "anti-Semitic"
TM Germany, the "powers-that-be" (cough cough) saw no need for a
mass-mind-raping of jew-less Japan.

Sanger: Yet museum exhibits nearby were largely silent on what led to that horror,
a Japanese war machine that tore through Asia for a decade before the morning that changed the history of the 20th century.

Rebuttal:
Actually, Sanger, it was the Globalist war machine, dating back to the Spanish-American War of 1898 (fought for the purpose
of stealing Guam and the Philippines from Spain), which incited Nationalist China to make and maintain war against Japan.
In much the same manner in which Hitler was forced to "tear through" Europe in self-defense, so too was "aggressor"
Japan maneuvered into defending itself from US & UK encirclement.

From Emperors Hirohito's Declaration of War

New York Times: 12/8/1941

"It has truly been unavoidable and far from our wishes that our Empire has
been brought to cross swords with America and Britain. More than four years have passed since China, failing to
comprehend the true intentions of our Empire, and recklessly courting trouble, disturbed the peace of East Asia
and compelled our Empire to take up arms. Although there has been reestablished the National Government of China,
with which Japan had effected neighborly intercourse and cooperation, the regime which has survived in Chungking, relying
upon American and British protection, still continues its fratricidal opposition.

Eager for the realization of their inordinate
ambition to dominate the Orient, both America and Britain, giving support to the Chungking regime, have aggravated
the disturbances in East Asia. Moreover these two powers, inducing other countries to follow suit, increased military
preparations on all sides of our Empire to challenge us. They have obstructed by every means our peaceful commerce
and finally resorted to a direct severance of economic relations, menacing greatly the existence of our Empire.

Patiently have we waited and long have we endured, in the hope that our Government might retrieve
the situation in peace. But our adversaries, showing not the least spirit of conciliation, have unduly delayed a
settlement; and in the meantime they have intensified the economic and political pressure to compel our Empire to
submission. This trend of affairs, would, if left unchecked, not only nullify our Empire's efforts of many
years for the sake of the stabilization of East Asia, but also endanger the very existence of our nation. The situation
being such as it is, our Empire, for its existence and self defense has no other recourse but to appeal to arms and
to crush every obstacle in its path."

*

Sanger:
For Americans of the World War II generation, and many of their children, Hiroshima is at the center of a very
different narrative.

Rebuttal: That "very different narrative" is what your amateur psycho-analysts
here at The Anti-New York Times refer to as a conscience-soothing falsehood. Because our
American egos and "Christian" morals cannot cope with the reality of an American-caused genocide, we fall easy and
willing victims to rationalizations for Hiroshima & Nagasaki (and Tokyo and Hamburg and Dresden etc).

Sanger:
They believe President Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the bomb saved tens of thousands of American lives that
would have been lost in an invasion of Honshu, Japan’s main island.

Rebuttal: This tiresome 71 year
old lie is thoroughly debunked in 'The Bad War'(by yours truly). Again, here is the "Cliff
Notes" version of the truthful counter-argument --- summed up by four main points:

1: There was no
"need" to invade Japan because the war was unjust and could have been stopped by FDR or Truman (who replaced
FDR after his death) at any time.

2: In boxing parlance, bombed-out Japan, with its navy sunk and
industrial capacity devastated, was already "on the ropes" and attempting to negotiate peace terms through the USSR
(which it was not at war with).

3: The mass-extermination of civilian non-combatants is dishonorable
and disgraceful. When Japan carried out the bombing of Peal Harbor, its air force only targeted ships, not the inland civilian
neighborhoods.

4: Unbeknownst to Japan, Stalin, Churchill and FDR (at Yalta Conference / January, 1945)
had already agreed that the USSR would break the Soviet-Japan Non-Aggression Pact of 1941 and declare war against Japan no
later than 90 days after the end of war in Europe (which turned out to be May 8th, 1945) -- a promise which Stalin
gladly kept with his August 8th entrance into the war (that's how North Korea became communist). Soviet entry would
have compelled a badly-weakened Japan to surrender unconditionally anyway.

1- At Yalta, the "Big 3" psychopaths had already sealed Japan's fate by agreeing to the terms for a late
summer surprise Soviet entry into the Asian theater.

2- General Macarthur (on his view of pre-atom-bombed Japan): "My
staff was unanimous in believing that Japan was on the point of collapse and surrender."

Sanger: Ask the few surviving veterans of that generation -- and there
is no looking back at Truman’s decision, no moral equivalence between a Japanese campaign that killed more than 20
million in Asia and the horror of the bomb that ended it all.

Rebuttal: Again, blame the New World
Order gang for those "20 million"
Asian dead. It was their agents and manipulations that drove a wedge between China and Japan.

Sanger: The two drastically different
interpretations of what happened have always pulled, sometimes in unspoken ways, at the strong alliance between the United
States and Japan.

Translation: Unlike the psychologically self-subjugated Germans, Japan resents its colonial
status which grew out of World War II. Though their minds remain somewhat free, their nation remains militarily and economically
occupied by their western oppressors.

Sanger:
Mr. Obama will make no apology in Hiroshima, the White House insisted on Tuesday. He will not second-guess Truman for the
decision to drop the bomb in Hiroshima, or for the far more questionable call to drop a second three days later, on Nagasaki.

Rebuttal:
The "exceptional nation" doesn't do apologies unless it has a hidden agenda; such as Obongo's pre-Arab Spring "apology
tour" to the Arabs -- a cynical ploy intended to conceal the CIA's coming unleashing of the "spontaneous" uprisings
which destabilized Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Sudan, Yemen and Syria (but I digress).

Sanger: Newer
exhibits in Hiroshima have reminded visitors that the city was no random target, but a buzzing manufacturing hub of the
Japanese war machine. “Some of us believe that when we think about the bomb, we should think about the war, too,”
Hiroshima’s mayor told me in 1994...

Rebuttal: Since time immemorial, every country
has had its share of dirty rotten filthy traitors. Japan is no different.

Sanger:
... as we walked through the new exhibit, which Japanese rightists had opposed opening.

Rebuttal:
"Rightists" is Globospeak for "patriots."

Sanger: Yet even today... sanitized accounts
of the war taught to a new generation of Japanese schoolchildren largely avoid delving into the decision-making that led
to the Pacific War...

Rebuttal: Sanger is upset that Japanese kids are not being brainwashed to the degree
that their western counterparts are.

Sanger: the Rape of Nanjing ...

Rebuttal:
The "Rape of Nanjing" is to Chinese mythology what the mythical gas chambers of Auschwitz are to Jewish mythology.
(here)

Sanger: ... or questions of whether the “comfort women” were organized by the Japanese
military.

Rebuttal: The "enslaved comfort women" were actually
Korean practitioners of "the world's oldest profession". These whores -- and in some cases, their pimping families
-- sold their services willingly. (here)

1-
Chinese monument to the "300,000" -- their version of the "6,000,000". The atricity propaganda about 'The
Rape of Nanking' is so embedded in the Chinese culture that it will take many years to undo.

2- Historically, whores have been drawn
to soldiers like flies to you-know-what. That's the TRUTH about the "comfort women."

Sanger: ... unlike Germany, Japan has never fully grappled with its past.

Translation:
... unlike Germany, Japan has never been fully mind-raped.

Sanger: Many Japanese ... remember that when the Smithsonian organized
the first exhibition of the Enola Gay ... veterans objected so loudly to the effort to conduct a dispassionate examination
of the decision to drop the bomb that Congress held hearings and the museum’s director was forced to resign.

Rebuttal:
USA! USA! USA!

Sanger:
“The top American military leaders who fought World War II, much to the surprise of many who are not aware of the
record, were quite clear that the atomic bomb was unnecessary, that Japan was on the verge of surrender, and — for
many — that the destruction of large numbers of civilians was immoral,” Gar Alperovitz, a leader of the movement
to revise the United States’ own historical accounting, wrote last year.

Rebuttal: Thanks for this deeply-buried
and highly useful nugget of truth, Sanger. Duly polished and preserved. You may resume dumping your propaganda manure.

Sanger:
“In Japan, I don’t think there has been much real evolution, at least among the right wing and the amnesiacs
who deny Japan’s destructive war in Asia and insist they were the victims,”said Richard Samuels, a professor
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ...

Rebuttal: That's it Sanger. Keep spreading it thick.

Sanger: But, if anything, the questions surrounding those last months
of the Pacific War in 1945 have only grown stronger. The firebombing of Tokyo in March of that year resulted in nearly 100,000
deaths by some accounts. And many who questioned the decision to drop the atomic bomb have asked why it was not first exploded
in an uninhabited place to demonstrate the dimensions of this new weapon’s power.

Rebuttal: Another fair point by Sanger -- however,
one must understand that the whole trick behind such understated "objectivity" involves burying a few pieces of
sound arguments from "the other side", while giving greater emphasis to "our side." In the final analysis,
the unsuspecting Boobus Americanus who plows through his article will still come out believing that the
atomic bombs dropped on Japan were just and necessary. That's "the art of the con," folks -- and few do it better
than the seditious scribes at Sulzberger's Slimes.

Monsters --- no good, lying, bloody
monsters!

*

Boobus
Americanus
1: I read a piece in the New
York Times today about Obama's upcoming visit to Hiroshima. He is not going to issue
an apology for the atomic bomb

Boobus
Americanus
2:
Nor should he! Those Japs started it all with the unprovoked surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.

Boobus
Americanus 1: You are correct
my fellow history buff! Furthermore, had Truman not dropped those bombs, tens of thousands of American soldiers would have
died invading Japan.

"@^5$ #@*&^ (&% ^&$ stupid #@ (*&^ $%#@ *&#@ !!!!!"

(Our mission of public enlightenment
is a difficult vocation, Sugar. Don't let them drive you crazy.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

TUESDAY / MAY 10, 2016

NY Times:The Making of an Ignoramus

By PAUL KRUGMAN

REBUTTAL
BY

This filthy little rat-faced
"Nobel Prize winning" economist, PBS / CIArlie Rose gadfly and Slimes columnist, Paul Krugman,
(cough cough) may not know a dad-gum thing about economics - or, more than likely, pretends
not to know - but when it comes to rhetorical trickery, kosher Krugman is a magician without peer. In
this editorial, the debt-loving vampire Krugman attacks Trump's sensible suggestion about refinancing some of our soon-to-be
$20 Trillion debt, while at the same time spinning statistics to support his usual monster-lie about debt not being a big
problem for America.

Krugman's love for Obongo is surpassed only
by his hatred for Trump. Note the childish T-shirt mocking Trump.

*

Krugman: Truly, Donald Trump knows nothing. He
is more ignorant about policy than you can possibly imagine.

Rebuttal: "Trump knows nothing." -- "ignorant".
Krugman opens the match with a classic logical fallacy -- argumentumad hominem as the ancient philosophers
of Rome called it. It is a logical fallacy in which a case is argued
by personally attacking one's adversary without addressing the substance of the argument itself.

Krugman: But his ignorance isn’t as unique as it may seem: In
many ways, he’s just doing a clumsy job of channeling nonsense widely popular in his party...

Rebuttal: "Ignorance" -- "Clumsy job"
-- "channeling nonsense." Enough with the schoolyard taunts, punk. Explain to us why Trump is wrong about the danger
of debt.

Krugman:
Last week the presumptive Republican presidential nominee finally revealed his plan to make America great again. Basically,
it involves running the country like a failing casino.

Rebuttal: More venom -- "running the country
like a failing casino." The intellectual arsenal of this vicious little bastard consists mainly of insults. Insults are
fine if they can be supported by facts (as your raging reporter and his fearless feline sidekick here always
do) -- but we're still waiting for Krugman's supporting logic.

The
great Nobel-prize-winning intellectual argues like a naughty child.

Krugman: .. he could, he asserted, “make a deal” with creditors that
would reduce the debt burden ...

Rebuttal: Why is that a
bad thing?

Krugman: ... if his outlandish
promises of economic growth don’t work out.

Rebuttal: Trump
did not make "outlandish" promises of growth. His projections are totally in line with pre-Obongo growth trends.
Remove the dead weight of government from the tired shoulders of the American economy, and there is no telling what type of
growth numbers we can achieve.

Oh, and speaking of "outlandish
promises", Paulie, when are you going to call out Obongo for his broken promises to reduce the debt and cover everyone
with Obongocare? Recall this line from campaign Obongo in 2008:

"The problem is, is that the way Bush
has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving
up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents - (Bush) #43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that
we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back -- $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That's
irresponsible. It's unpatriotic."

Bush ended up adding $5 Trillion -- Obongo will finish his reign of ruin having
piled on an additional $10 Trillion.

Krugman: The reaction from everyone who knows anything about finance or economics...

Rebuttal:Another fallacy:Argumentum
Ad Verecundiam -- argument from inappropriate
authority. Krugman cherry-picks other libtard economists to support his own fallacies, while dismissing other sane economists
who agree with Trump.

Krugman: ...was a mix of amazed horror
and horrified amazement.

Rebuttal: "Horror"
-- "amazement". More insults and scare tactics, but still no sound argument to rebut Trump.

Krugman: One
does not casually suggest throwing away America’s carefully cultivated reputation as the world’s most scrupulous
debtor...

Rebuttal: The Federal Reserve
and Social Security are the largest holders of U.S. T-Bills (here). As a highly placed attack-poodle for the Money Masters (cough cough), what Krugman is really saying is:
"One does not casually suggest that the Rothschilds are to be negotiated with."

Krugman: — a reputation that
dates all the way back to Alexander Hamilton.

Rebuttal: We are no fans
of Hamilton, but the debt tsunami facing America is unlike anything before in our history. Something has got to done. Oh,
by the way, Paulie, even bankster-boy Hamilton would have been appalled at the level of debt that you and your commie crowd
have buried us in. Read the Hamilton quote below:

Krugman's bankster hero did indeed believe
in public debt -- but stressed that it should not be excessive and "extinguished" when possible.

Krugman: The Trump solution would, among other things,
deprive the world economy of its most crucial safe asset, U.S. debt...

Rebuttal: U.S. debt is no longer a "safe asset." With interest rates on T-Bills near 0 and the "cost-of-living"
running at 5% per year (the actual figure), we are already defaulting investors to the tune of -4% per year. That
is why China is cutting back on T-Bills and buying more and more gold.

Krugman: Of course, we can be sure that Mr.
Trump knows none of this, and nobody in his entourage is likely to tell him.

Rebuttal: Blah...blah...blah. Trump is stupid, Trump was married three times, Trump dyes his hair. Blah ... blah... blah. Grow
up and make an actual case, you putrid little worm.

Krugman: But before we simply ridicule him — or, actually, at
the same time that we’re ridiculing him — let’s ask where his bad ideas really come from.

Rebuttal:
Ridicule -- ridicule -- ridicule. Coming from a little poop-stain of an "economist"
who never actually ran a business, nor met a payroll, nor even ran a lemonade stand in his life.

Krugman: First of all, Mr. Trump obviously believes
that America could easily find itself facing a debt crisis. But why? After all, investors, who are willing to lend to America
at incredibly low interest rates, are evidently not worried by our debt.

Rebuttal: Krugman misses the point. The danger of our
debt is not to wealthy investors and foreign governments. They will get on just fine regardless of whether we default or not.
The great danger lies in the tax and inflation burden to us and our children.

Krugman: And there’s good
reason for their calmness: federal interest payments are only 1.3 percent of G.D.P., or 6 percent of total outlays.

Rebuttal: Again, Krugman shows his true colors by speaking only of the interests of
investors (money lenders) without regard to the tax and inflation burdens being placed upon the American people.
It's not a question of if we can pay the interest, but rather, how much the interest payments are hurting us.

Krugman:
These numbers mean both that the burden of the debt is fairly small and that even complete repudiation of that debt would
have only a minor impact on the government’s cash flow.

Rebuttal: And yet again,
Krugman -- that self-professed champion of the common man -- focuses only the investor element of the national debt while
ignoring the severe damage done to the public. Since Krugman won't explain, allow us to put the case against debt into simple
terms. Two points:

The National Debt creates a tax burden for the middle class

For 2016, interest
on the National Debt will costs U.S. taxpayers about $220 Billion. To put that into perspective, we estimate
that if America were not carrying a national debt, we could exempt the first $90,000 of household income from income
taxes altogether!

The National Debt contributes to inflation

To help finance the National Debt, the
government sells T-Bills to the Federal Reserve. To purchase the interest-bearing bonds, the Fed creates debt-money
out of thin air. This increases the money supply. More currency chasing the same amount of goods equals inflation, and
the
compounding interest attached to that new currency makes it even worse.

Krugman: So why is Mr. Trump even talking about
this subject?

Rebuttal: Because, unlike you and your fellow
"experts", Trumpevidently understands what "ignoramus" Thomas Jefferson,"ignoramus"George Washington, "ignoramus"
Benjamin Franklin and "ignoramus John Adams all warned us about 200 years ago.

The
Big Four intellectual powerhouses who founded the nation ("ignoramuses" as Crookman would no doubt describe them) were
unanimous in cautioning about the very public debt that he dismisses as "not a problem."

Washington: "As a
very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly
as possible, avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, ... avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not
only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertion in time of peace to discharge the debts which unavoidable
wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear."

Jefferson:
"Loading up the nation with debt and leaving it for the following generations to pay is morally irresponsible. Excessive
debt is a means by which governments oppress the people and waste their substance. No nation has a right to contract debt
for periods longer than the majority contracting it can expect to live."

Franklin: “Rather
go to bed without dinner than to rise in debt.”

Adams: "The consequences arising from the continual
accumulation of public debts in other countries ought to admonish us to be careful to prevent their growth in our own."

Krugman: A lot of this debt hysteria ....

Rebuttal:"Debt hysteria?"Good Lord -- this
man is so frickin' evil.

Krugman: ... was really about trying to bully us
into cutting Social Security and Medicare...

Rebuttal: Crookman! You lying piece of erudite excrement! It is your inflationary debt policies that are cutting the
real value of Social Security payments.

Krugman: But Mr. Trump apparently wasn’t in on that particular
con, and takes the phony debt scare seriously.

Rebuttal: "Phony debt scare?"
Only a communist subversive would poo-poo a $20 Trillion dollar debt with an additional $80 Trillion in unfunded liabilities
coming down the road. Clearly, Krugman wants a hyper-inflationary collapse.

Krugman: Sad!

Rebuttal:
What's sad is that the U.S. cannot follow China's example and ban Sulzberger's subversive Slimes.

Krugman:.. ridiculous Trumpisms .... from
his claim that the true unemployment rate vastly exceeds official figures.

Rebuttal: "ridiculous Trumpisms" -- more childish insults not supported by fact. It is not "his
claim" that the unemployment numbers are rigged. The Department of Labor actually publishes, on one of its own websites,
a much higher unemployment number (the U6), while reporting a lower number (the U3) to the media. (here)

Krugman: ... to his claim that he can bring prosperity by starting
a trade war with China.

Rebuttal: He never said that, you rat-faced liar! To the contrary, it is your girl Killary
who wants to start a shooting war with China. But Trump did say this:

"Wouldn't
it be nice if we got along with Russia and China and all these countries? Wouldn't it be nice?"

Krugman:
Oh, and just for the record: No, it’s not the same on the other side of the aisle. You may dislike Hillary Clinton,
you may disagree sharply with her policies ...

(Not one
man in one hundred can define the cause & effect dynamics between public debt, Fed money printing and debased currency
value.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

MONDAY / MAY 9, 2016

Young black women set
to graduate from West Point ignited debate last week when they raised their fists in this group photo.

NY Times:Raised-Fist Photo by Black Women at West Point
Spurs Inquiry

By DAVE
PHILIPPS

REBUTTAL
BY

The United States Military Academy at West Point, 'West Point' for
short, is a four-year army academy located in New York State.
Located about 50 miles north of New York City, the academy overlooks the scenic Hudson River. The Academy at West Point traces
its roots to 1801, when the new President, Thomas Jefferson set in motion plans to establish the Academy. The entire central
campus is a national landmark and home to scores of historic sites, buildings, and monuments. West Point is
was all about tradition, honor and duty.

Like every other venerable institution in the degenerate Marxified nation we once referred to as
"God's country", West Point has also been injected with the virus of liberalism. The social transformation began
in 1976 with the forced admission of a handful of silly women who wanted to play soldier-gal; and culminated with Obongo's
2010 repeal of the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" rule which regulated faggotry in military. Today, anything goes at the
alma mater of Lee, Patton, and Macarthur.

Scenes
of 'An Officer and a Degenerate' -- love and marriage at the new West Point

The article explains the latest outrage:

"A group of young black women poised to
graduate from the United States Military Academy gathered on the steps of West Point’s oldest barracks last week in
traditional gray dress uniforms, complete with sabers, for a group photo. Known as an “Old Corps” photograph
because it mimics historical portraits, it was nearly identical to thousands that cadets have posed for over the decades,
with one key difference: The 16 women raised their clenched fists.

The gesture, posted on Facebook and Twitter last week,
touched off a barrage of criticism in and out of the armed forces as some commenters accused the women of allying themselves
with the Black Lives Matter movement and sowing racial divisions in a military that relies on assimilation."

1915
2016

What
would George Patton (Image 1) have to say about such a "fundamental transformation" of America?

The de-balled administrators at West Point have opened an "investigation" into
whether the Black banshees violated Army rules prohibiting political activities while in uniform. Be assured, as in 100%
'you-can-take-it-to-the-bank' -- that West Point, famed for its strictness, won't do a damn thing about this ugly incident.
For you see, not even a shell fired from an Abrams tank can penetrate the magical barrier of protective pigmentation which
the Jewish gods of 'political correctness' have constructed around their anti-White pets.

As controversy over the photo emerged, the terrorist-sympathizing skanks in question
quickly shifted into that "I dindu nuffin" mode that works so well for them -- assuring detractors that
the clenched fist pose was only meant as a show of sisterly solidarity, not cop-killing, bigotry or revolution. This explanation
is, of course, a lie -- itself an expellable offense from honor-based West Point. The clenched fist salute
stands for Communist Power and/or one of its evil spawns, Black Power -- and these catty cadets with scowls on their faces
damn well know it!

*

Mandela
and Beyonce -- the clenched fist can only stand for Red Power or Black Power -- often both.

These nasty little
spoiled affirmative action hags were granted a great, though undeserved, privilege. Upon completing the mandatory 5-year service
which follows graduation from the free Academy, a West Point grad, especially a sanctified "minority",
can pretty much write his or her own ticket in life. Instead of gratitude, Beyonce's little bitches show us a fist -- just
weeks before their graduation date! "Thanks for the degree -- you stupid White suckas. Now F you!"

If West Point had
any honor left in its once hallowed halls, these hateful hideous hags would not be permitted to graduate in a few weeks. But
they will. At worst, after the "investigation" is complete, the dindu nuffins will be told to do 10 push-ups ---
girly style. Wait and see.

*

Boobus
Americanus
1:I read a
piece in the New York Times today about a group of Black female West Point
cadets who are being investigated for doing a clenched fist salute.

Boobus
Americanus 2:
I saw that. I think West Point is being a little too uptight. Let the girls have a little fun before they graduate.

(The Boobuses
will finally figure it all out when they are too old and too outnumbered to stop it.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

FRIDAY / MAY 6, 2016

German Jews from
Würzburg and Kitzingen, in Bavaria, being deported to ghettos and concentration camps.

NY Times:Mapping the Holocaust: How Jews Were Taken to Their Final
Destinations

By ISABEL KERSHNER

REBUTTAL
BY

What's
this? A Holocaust TM story appearing in the Jew York Slimes? No frickin' way! (rolling
eyes in sarcasm). Break out the tissues and violins; and pay no attention to those "White guys" who run the
media, Hollywood, the banks, academia, the government, etc. Diversion and protection -- that's always been the game with this
"Shoah business."

Gas
masks and goggles on, truth seekers. Into the mythical mist of the Zyklon B we go!

"There's no business like Shoah business like no business I know."

*

Slimes: Nini
Ungar clearly recalled that Friday in February 1942 when the Nazis loaded her, her husband and her parents on a cattle cart
and transferred them....

The Viennese were standing and laughing. ‘Finally they got the Jews out!’ ” Ms. Ungar,
who was born Mina Tepper ... recounted in video testimony."

Rebuttal: Assuming Ms.
Unger's account of the Viennese "standing and laughing" as the Jews departed is even true, dare we ask why
the Austrian-Germans were so happy to see the Jews being deported? Y'all must have done something really bad to piss-off
the famously polite and civil people of Germany. What might that have been? Hmmmm?

Always
the "victims" -- eh? The images above are from 1933, a full 9 years BEFORE most Jews and Communists were interned
during World War II.

Slimes: Her
journey across a wintry Europe can now be traced on a database that documents about 1,100 transports, searchable by train
(or boat or bus) or victim’s name.

Rebuttal: How about some tears for the 5 million Germans booted out of their homes after World War I; or the 15 million
forced out after World War II? At least the Jews had sheltered transportation. The poor Germans were forced to march westward
while exposed to the elements.

Slimes: A project of Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust memorial and
research center, the database sheds new light on the cross-border, Europewide nature of the stages leading to the mass extermination
of some six million Jews, known in Hebrew as the Shoah.

Rebuttal: Where are the actual remains of these "six
million" TM bodies? Oh, that's right. There were turned into ashes in a handful
of crematoria the size of pizza-ovens.

Slimes: “Very often people think of the Shoah as something that took place in the camps
and killing sites in Eastern Europe from a geographical perspective,” said Joel Zisenwine, who has directed the “Transports
to Extinction” project since 2008. “By focusing on the transports, I think we provide a more precise image of
the Final Solution.”

Rebuttal: So, the Jews
were "transported" to the camps? Wow. That's interesting. We never knew that. We just figured they flew into the
camps by flapping their arms.Ya learn something new every day.

1- Dutch Jews boarding a train bound for an internment camp.

2 & 3 - Japanese-Americans were also interned
by FDR. The only difference between the two events was that the Japanese-Americans had never expressed any hostility towards
their adopted country.

Slimes: “In Paris, Amsterdam
or Salonika, people may not have witnessed mass murder,” he said, “but they did witness Jews being marched to
the train station.”

Rebuttal: This is really getting ridiculous.

Slimes:
On arrival at the Skirotava station in Riga, the deportees were told that they had to walk miles to the ghetto,
and that those unable to make the distance could take buses instead.

Rebuttal: So, the big bad genocidal Germans were considerate
enough to allow elderly Jews to ride buses instead of walking the last few miles? That was nice of them, eh?

Slimes: Yad Vashem researchers said the vehicles were not buses but gas trucks, and their passengers
were murdered.

Rebuttal: Ah yes. Of course. That explains it. The old "the-bus-is-actually-a-gas-chamber-on-wheels"
trick. Those clever Germans!

Slimes: Half a dozen researchers are beginning the next phase: mapping the transports
in Eastern Europe, where documentation is harder to come by.

Rebuttal: What exactly does the "mapping" of the transports prove? No one had ever disputed that Jews and Communists
(plenty of overlap there!), as a temporary wartime security measure, were placed in internment camps as enemy aliens.
Show us some forensic or documentary evidence of the Holohoax -- not "transportation routes."

Slimes:
He described one of the sisters — it was not clear which — approaching the commander of the camp, showing him
an identifying document, saying she was the sister of Sigmund Freud and asking to be given light office work. The commander
said there must have been a mistake and told her that in two hours there should be a train to Vienna.

Rebuttal: That
was nice of the big bad Germans, eh?

Slimes: “She could leave
all her valuables and documents here, have a bath, and after the bath she would receive her documents and a travel permit
to Vienna. The lady, of course, went to the bath house, from which she never returned.”

Rebuttal: Ah yes.
Of course. That explains it. The old "the-bathroom-is-actually-a-gas-chamber" trick. Those clever Germans!

One thing
we must concede about the Tribe -- they sure do produce some funny comedy writers!

*

"A
Jewish guy walks into a bar and asks if he can use the bathroom......"

*

Boobus
Americanus
1:I read an interesting piece in the New
York Times today about the transport routes used during the Holocaust.

Boobus
Americanus
2: I can't imagine the horror the 6 million Jews must have felt -- not
knowing what or where they were being shipped to.

"Cheer up
Boobus. It couldn't have been sso bad. Check out these Yiddish yentass ssinging in a choir at Ausschwitz. "

(It's not what it seems, Sugar. You see, unbeknownst to the choir, the conductor is actually releasing
Zyklon B gas from his baton.)

COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS

Email address:

Comments:

greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

THURSDAY / MAY 5, 2016

NY Times:Why We Need a Foreign Policy Elite

By EVAN
THOMAS

REBUTTAL
BY

Evan Welling Thomas IIIis a journalist and author of nine
books, including two New York Times bestsellers. He is the grandson of Norman Thomas, the six-time Presidential
candidate for the Socialist Party of America who boldly predicted that America would one day become a socialist
(in the Marxist sense) country. With that background, it's not surprising that Thomas would defend the "elite" of the U.S. foreign
policy Establishment -- a clique of Ivy League geeks that Trump seems to want nothing to do with.

Let's dissect and debunk a few excerpts from this
idiotic op-ed inked by the yellow-journalist grandson of Norman Thomas. Evan my boy, better get your protective head gear
and smelling salts -- because Sugar and I are about to hurt you.

By
running as an openly socialist 3rd Party candidate, Grandpa Norman Thomas made socialists FDR, Truman and Eisenhower all seem
like "moderates."

*

"The
Very Best Men" --- "The Wise Men"

Just the titles of two of Thomas' bestsellers reveal his dangerous elitism.

Evan Thomas: NO one, not even Donald J. Trump, vilified
the Eastern elite more than Richard M. Nixon. He particularly railed against Harvard. “None
of them in the cabinet, do you understand? None of those Harvard bastards!” he bellowed at his chief of staff
H. R. Haldeman.

Rebuttal: In light of that funny quote, it's no small wonder that Nixon was set up for removal by the "Eastern
elite". (Nixon was impeached and forced to resign over a relatively minor event -- "Watergate")

Evan Thomas:
Yet when it came time to pick a national security adviser, he chose Henry Kissinger, a Harvard
professor who today embodies the East Coast foreign policy establishment.

Rebuttal: A better way of saying
it would be "he was forced to choose Henry Kissinger" -- a man that Nixon resented and never fully trusted.
It is possible that a President Trump might also be forced to bring in some of these characters in exchange for support from
key Republicans. We shall see.

1-
Nixon had to work closely with his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger (cough cough) -- a man who, in the grand scheme of
things, actually outranked the President.

2- The "Nixon tapes" would later reveal that Nixon and his Chief-of-Staff
Haldeman resented Kissinger and "the Jewish press".

3- It was Katerine Meyer-Graham's (cough cough) Washington Compost which eventually
brought down Nixon.

Rebuttal: The word "isolationism" TM
is a weaponized term of Globalist propaganda intended to silence those who advocate peace and good relations with other countries.
The word is used much like "racism" TMor "anti-Semitism" TM. Grow up, Evan.

Evan Thomas: ... in Mr. Trump’s world, the foreign policy elite
in both parties have forced us into expensive alliances and wars. Get rid of them, and America will be great again.

Rebuttal:
Evan, are you saying that NATO, the maintenance of a zillion military bases, the Iraq War, and "the Asian pivot"
were not expensive?

Evan Thomas: In fact, he has that backward. As much as his neo-isolationism...

Rebuttal: "Frightens our allies" is code language for
"reduces U.S. influence over our European puppets."

Evan Thomas: .. it is Mr. Trump’s anti-establishment stance that
most threatens international security.

Rebuttal: Say what?! Dude! Trump is the only candidate
who wants to kiss and make-up with nuclear-armed Russia. Tell me Evan, how does having good relations with Russia "threaten international security?" Methinks that it is you
who "has that backward."

Evan Thomas: ... since its emergence as a global power in the late 19th century,
America has relied on a highly trained corps of diplomats, worldly financiers and academics to steer it straight.

Rebuttal:
How is that reliance upon "diplomats, worldly
financiers (cough cough) and academics" workin' out for ya?

By the way; are these the same
"diplomats, worldly financiers (cough cough) and academics" that
brought us the Spanish-American War, the Philippines War, World War I, World War II, the Cold War, the permanent Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, the Korean War, the Iranian coup, the Vietnam War, the Cambodian genocide, the Vietnamese boat refugees, the Beirut
Marine disaster, Gulf War I, the War in Kosovo, the NAFTA disaster, the Somalia disaster, the African genocides, Gulf War
II, the Libya disaster, the Syria disaster, the Sudan disaster, the "migrant" disaster and the looming showdown
with Russia and China? --- Yeah. That's them. Real geniuses, eh Evan? What would we do without them?

Dead
American boys -- World War I -- World War II -- Iraq War. Thanks "best & brightest!"

The "very best men" of the eastern Establishment require endless sums of tax-money and public debt to pay
for all the good they bring to the world. Don't the stupid "isolationists" realize this?

*

Evan Thomas: Get rid of them, as Mr. Trump seems
intent on doing, and chaos will follow.

Rebuttal: No Evan. Get rid of them and peace will follow!
Speaking of "chaos" -- How are those Ivy League projects in formerly stable Iraq, Syria and Libya makin' out lately?
--- Evan? (sound of crickets)

Rebuttal: I like to refer to "the very best men" as
erudite eggheads -- smooth talking know-nothings who, partly by design and partly by accident, destroy everything they touch.
Their historical record speaks for itself.

Evan Thomas: But it was obvious, even then, that this was campaign bluster. Eisenhower
played the genial, folksy man of the people, but his secretaries of state, John Foster Dulles and Christian Herter, were
prominent members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Rebuttal: Thank
you -- thank you -- thank you for confirming for us that U.S. foreign policy is indeed run out of the New York-based CFR.
Keep that up, Evan, and soon they'll be calling you a "conspiracy theorist."

Evan
Thomas:Of course,
the “best and the brightest” of the 1960s administrations — academics like Walt Rostow and Mr. Kissinger,
corporate titans like Robert S. McNamara — were far from perfect, to put it kindly. They bear the blame for Vietnam
and the 58,000 American soldiers who died there, not to mention the millions of Vietnamese. But they
also strengthened a world order balanced precariously on the edge of nuclear war. They expanded trade, deepened alliances
and underwrote billions in foreign aid.

Rebuttal: This is a classic "yeah but" trick. You see, Evans
cannot avoid the harsh reality of the unnecessary deaths of 58,000 young American men, the 300,000 wounded, the millions of
Vietnamese civilians killed, and the destabilization of American society that these "far from perfect" geniuses
engineered. So, he mentions it only in passing, followed by a "but", and then continues on writing about how great
the “best
and the brightest”were in spite of the Vietnam War disaster. Disgusting!

Evan
Thomas confirms for us that "elite" CFR scum like Robert McNamara were behind the Vietnam War. Killary Clinton is
a member of the CFR -- Trump is not.

Evan Thomas: None of this was cheap, but they understood — as Mr. Trump
seems not to — that the global stability bought with such efforts is worth far more.

Rebuttal: Meaningless
platitude. What "global stability" did the eggheads buy (with our bloody tax-money!) Evan? The
world hasn't been "stable" in at least 100 years!

Evan Thomas: And contrast the mistakes of the 1960s to times when
Washington allowed foreign policy to be set by public consensus. In the 1930s, Congress closed off free trade to protect
American industry and listened to voters who wanted a smaller, less costly military with no entangling alliances. The results?
The Smoot-Hawley tariff contributed to the Great Depression...

Rebuttal: In the grand
scheme of things, Evan, the Smoot-Hawley tariff was not a contributing factor of the Great Depression. As
even two of the "best and the brightest" of the financial world, former Fed Chairmen Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke
have admitted, the Fed's destructive manipulation of the money supply was the true cause of the 1929 Crash and
the ensuing Great Depression (here). FDR's regulations and socialist schemes then exacerbated the crisis. But you, being the grandson of big government
commie-pinko Norman Thomas, would rather talk about the mythical negative effect of Smoot-Hawley (here).

Evan
Thomas: ... and the failure of the League of Nations allowed the rise of fascism and global war.

1-
Globalists like Evans always blame "protectionism" for the Great Depression -- but Fed Chairmen Greenspan and Bernanke
(both CFR men) have rightly blamed the Fed.

2- The Bad War DESTROYS the big lie of "American-isolationism-caused-World-War-II"
once and for all.

Evan Thomas: Even then, some members of the East
Coast elite knew better. A small group of mostly Ivy Leaguers met at the Century Club in New York to work up a semi-secret
plan to push America toward greater involvement with Britain in its stand against Hitler.

Rebuttal:Thank you -- thank you -- thank you for confirming for us that the "East
Coast elite" (cough cough) was "working up a semi-secret plan" to drag America into the war all along. Keep that up,
Evan, and soon they'll be calling you an "anti-Semite" in addition to a "conspiracy theorist."

Evan Thomas:
President Franklin D. Roosevelt listened and chose Henry Stimson, a Republican Wall Street
lawyer from Yale and Harvard Law School, as his Secretary of War...

Rebuttal: Good Lord! Henry Stimson was
a dirty, rotten, traitorous son-of-a-bitch who helped FDR instigate the justified Japanese attack on the naval base at Pearl
Harbor -- a deadly tragedy, known to Stimson and FDR in advance, which would claim the lives of
2,000 unprepared U.S. sailors.

Evan Thomas: If America had heeded Stimson and his ilk from the beginning and worked harder to
build up European alliances before Nazi Germany became unstoppable, American soldiers might not have needed to fight their
way onto the Continent.

Rebuttal: Why exactly did American soldiers "need to fight their way
onto the Continent," eh Evan? Answer: To crush peaceful nationalism and set up the framework for the eventual European
Union of neutered Whites, Africans and Asians. Have a look at Europe today and take a bow, Evan. You and your filthy ilk have
done your dirty work very well.

Pearl Harbor came as no "surprise"
to instigator Stimson -- a hero of Evan Thomas.

HARRY
STIMSON'S CONFESSION!

"We
face the delicate question of the diplomatic fencing to be done so as to be sure Japan is put into
the wrong and makes the first bad move. … The question was how we should maneuver them into the position
of firing the first shot."

***

"When the news
first came that Japan had attacked us my first feeling was of relief that
… a crisis had come in a way which would unite all our people. This continued to be my dominant
feeling in spite of the news of catastrophes which quickly developed."

- From the diary of Henry Stimson

Evan Thomas: Fortunately,
dalliances with anti-establishment, populist isolationism tend to be short-lived. Over the years, voters wisely turned away
from naive beckoning to create “Fortress America,” as Senator Robert Taft advertised in the early 1950s, or to
“Come Home, America,” George McGovern’s presidential campaign slogan in 1972.

Rebuttal: Unfortunately,
the Globalists, by use of their vicious Piranha Press, have always been able to beat down the nationalists and the peacemakers.
That is the only reason why the voters "wisely turn away" from non-interventionists.

Evan Thomas: And while “elite” has an obvious anti-democratic meaning,
today the foreign policy establishment looks more like the America it guides. The Eastern establishment was exceedingly
insular in Eisenhower’s day: white, male, Protestant, preppy. .... Today’s foreign policy establishment is heavily
populated by graduates of elite schools, but many of them are minorities and the children and grandchildren of immigrants.

Rebuttal:
Wonderful. Instead of elite Anglo-Saxon Harvard-Yale-Princeton-Oxford scumbags exclusively sticking a red,white & blue
bayonet up our posteriors; we now have the pleasure of elite "minority" Harvard-Yale-Princeton-Oxford scumbags joining
in on the fun as well -- and using a rainbow-decorated bayonet instead. Is that supposed to make the families of the Black & Hispanic & female vets who were killed in Iraq
and Afghanistan feel better about their senseless loss?

Don't kid yourself, Evan. The usual suspects (cough
cough) still sit at the very pinnacle of the New World Order pyramid. And neither they nor you give a rat's behind about
the lives and limbs of millions of innocent human beings, both foreign and American. Dangerous "elite" filth like
you need to be straight-jacketed and institutionalized -- better yet, injected with the very same bye-bye juice that "the
best and the brightest" are quietly, by way of semi-secret government incentives and mandates, administering to hospitalized
seniors in order to free up money for running and expanding the Global empire --- but I digress.

Evan Thomas: No doubt, the modern
foreign policy establishment can be criticized for stale or lazy thinking, or parochial self-interest.

Rebuttal: This smells like another fake and obligatory watered-down criticism. A "yeah-but" is in the making...

Evan Thomas:But it still includes many men and women with a sophisticated knowledge of the world.

Rebuttal:
There it is! Manipulative "yeahbut-ism" in all its rhetorical splendor!

Evan, if the oh-so-sophisticated "foreign policy establishment"
knows so much about the world; then why is the modern world such a bloody mess? (migrant crisis, Syria, Sudan, Libya,
South China Sea, Ukraine, global debt, false-flag terror, systemic corruption, proxy wars, rumors of World War III etc.)

Evan Thomas:
To ignore them and their counsel is foolish.

Rebuttal: Quite the contrary, tough guy. To heed the "best and brightest"
and their crazy counsel is what would be "foolish!"

Keep your damn Ivy League eggheads. No more of their hunger sanctions
on innocent peoples; no more "smart bombing" of children; no more Predator drone strikes of weddings and funerals;
no more wars for Globalism & Zionism; no more mercenary CIA proxy wars; no more NGO color revolutions & coups; no
more job-killing trade deals; no more sovereignty-busting international treaties; no more assassinations.