Iran’s political theatre

Who will replace Ahmadinejad?

The Iranian presidential election, scheduled for 14th June, is a stage onto which regime loyalists and opposition groups are jostling to clamber—for different reasons. Loyalists are anxious to put behind them memories of the 2009 presidential elections, which brought thousands out onto the streets, wearing green armbands and waving green banners, protesting that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had “stolen” the result. They intend to show the world—and reassure themselves—that they are in control, and that the political system is intact. Opposition groups want to show the opposite. The election is therefore far more than a means of electing President Ahmadinejad’s successor. It is a piece of theatre which will be a barometer of political health-—of Iran’s claim to pick at least some of those running the country by democratic election. Preparations have been in gestation since 2009, when the regime’s plans got out of hand. The crowds did not perform as instructed. The protests were on a scale unseen since the days of the 1979 Islamic revolution—as was the repression that followed. In 2012 the regime tightly managed the parliamentary elections, so much so that no one remembers what happened, still less the result. Unlike 2009, very little foreign press was invited; it remains unclear whether any will be invited this time round. That said, a presidential election, where the personalities and politics tend to be more clearly delineated, is a better test of whether Iran’s religious leaders will allow the post to be filled by popular vote. The leadership understands the importance of putting on a good show, of securing a good turnout and exciting public opinion. Given the 2009 experience it will take a mighty effort to convince people of the sincerity of the process, but efforts are certainly being made to generate interest in the candidates. Until recently the list of potential runners was distinguished by the level of obsequiousness to the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The significant outlier in the early discussions of who might run was Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, Ahmadinejad’s putative Chief of Staff and nominated successor. Mashaei has positioned himself as a “nationalist” politician, repeatedly calling for the adoption and promotion of an Iranian school of Islam. The clear irritation he causes among the clergy, including Khamenei himself, has earned him plaudits among those who see the election as a means of giving the Supreme Leader a bloody nose. In those talks, two former presidents, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Mohammad Khatami were regarded as potential sponsors of candidates—and of ones who posed some challenge to Khamenei. But at the 11th hour and on the very cusp of the deadline, Rafsanjani decided to enter the race (fully endorsed by Khatami, Ahmadinejad’s predecessor and a moderate in his eight years as president). A succession of delegations from across the political spectrum had urged him (he said) to run as a unity candidate who could save the nation. Their argument is that Ahmadinejad—with the Supreme Leader’s backing—has mismanaged the Islamic republic’s fortunes, partly by pursuing the controversial nuclear programme to the point where it has provoked painful sanctions. Rafsanjani’s campaign rhetoric has given this some support, although he has been careful not to portray himself as giving in to the West’s demands. He has pitched his entry into the race not as an ordinary candidate, but as a national saviour, who might, as a successful businessman, repair ties with the west and restore growth. Whether Rafsanjani’s candidacy will prove a game changer depends very much on whether his sudden candidacy grabs the popular imagination, and overcomes questions about his own record and what he would actually do in office. From this point, it would be hard for him to get enough popular support, but not impossible. Of course, whether any candidate is allowed to run depends on Iran’s highly conservative Guardian Council which vets candidates for loyalty—a hurdle for Rafsanjani. The criteria have become stricter and are hardly transparent. But all candidates will have to profess loyality to the authority of the Supreme Leader whose decisions on issues domestic and foreign (including the nuclear negotiations), remain final. Rafsanjani’s candidacy has complicated matters for the council.It remains to be seen whether the it clears him. Its decisions about who can run are likely to be scrutinised as much as the election itself and Ahmadinejad for his part has barely disguised his determination to use whatever means at his disposal to ensure that Mashaei be allowed to run. It seems unlikely that the regime will allow the curtain to rise on a drama where it did not feel comfortable with the ending. But with Rafsanjani’s dramatic entrance, it is more likely that characters will depart from their script. The election itself may prove to be incidental to the performance that will then ensue.

YOU’VE HIT THE LIMIT

You have now reached your limit of 3 free articles in the last 30 days. But don’t worry! You can get another 7 articles absolutely free, simply by entering your email address in the box below.

When you register we’ll also send you a free e-book—Writing with punch—which includes some of the finest writing from our archive of 22 years. And we’ll also send you a weekly newsletter with the best new ideas in politics and philosophy of culture, which you can of course unsubscribe from at any time

Email

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information.

Click to learn more about these interests and how we use your data. You will be able to object to this processing on the next page and in all our communications.

Comments

No comments yet

Prospect's free newsletter

The big ideas that are shaping our world—straight to your inbox. PLUS a free e-book and 7 articles of your choosing on the Prospect website.

Prospect may process your personal information for our legitimate business purposes, to provide you with our newsletter, subscription offers and other relevant information. Click here to learn more about these purposes and how we use your data. You will be able to opt-out of further contact on the next page and in all our communications.

This Month's Magazine

How has the national broadcaster dealt with the biggest issue of our time? Plus: James Graham on John Bercow and Jennifer Williams on Manchester's housing boom (and homelessness crisis)

Register today and access any 7 articles on the Prospect’s website for FREE in the next 30 days.. PLUS find out about the big ideas that will shape our world—with Prospect’s FREE newsletter sent to your inbox. We'll even send you our e-book—Writing with punch—with some of the finest writing from the Prospect archive, at no extra cost!

Prospect subscribers have full access to all the great content on our website, including our entire archive.

If you do not know your login details, simply close this pop-up and click 'Login' on the black bar at the top of the screen, then click 'Forgotten password?', enter your email address and press 'Submit'. Your password will then be emailed to you.

Thank you for your support of Prospect and we hope that you enjoy everything the site has to offer.

This site uses cookies to improve the user experience. By using this site, you agree that we can set and use these cookies. For more details on the cookies we use and how to manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.