You
will notice that the title of this article contains a question mark.
That's because while there has been a great lack of planning concerning
issues such as those covered in Part 1
of this series, the power elite's plan for a new world order is being
fulfilled. The perception of national leaders as bumbling incompetents
incapable of planning is useful to the power elite, because it creates
the impression on the part of most people that there can't be a power
elite manipulating global events if national leaders are incapable
of managing events on their own level.

Part
of the power elite's plan includes the dispersal of nations' military
forces around the world. In that regard, American forces, including
the National Guard, increasingly have been deployed overseas, while
Germany now has a permanent military base in New Mexico. Various NATO
nations (e.g., Denmark, Norway and the Czech Republic) have sent a
mission to help victims of hurricane Katrina, while Mexico and Holland
have sent troops to help in the clean-up effort. Concerning Mexico,
many wonder why our southern border with that country is still so
unprotected when the federal government keeps telling us it's a matter
of "when," not "if," there will be another terrorist attack (perhaps
nuclear) here. It's because, according to a Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR) report, the borders between the U.S., Canada and Mexico are
largely to disappear, resulting in freer movement of people and goods
along with a common security arrangement.

The
CFR is an outgrowth of Cecil Rhodes' secret Society of the Elect's
plan "to take the government of the whole world," a fulfillment of
what was called the "Grand Design" of centuries past. It would be
a synthesis of Western Capitalism and Eastern Communism brought about
by saying this would be the only way to manage globally linked regional
economic arrangements (e.g., NAFTA linked with the European Union,
etc.). The plan was described by Rhodes' Association of Helpers member
P. E. Corbett in POST-WAR WORLDS (1942).

The
strategy to fulfill Rhodes' plan is geopolitical and economic, with
natural resources (e.g., oil and gas) and trade as the driving forces----part
of what Rhodes Trust member Rudyard Kipling referred to as "The Great
Game." The military effort in Kosovo was to stabilize that region
so that Europe could be linked via the Mediterranean and Middle East
to the Far East. This, of course, would require stability in the Middle
Eastern region----thus the pressure upon Israel and Palestinian supporters
to reach a peace agreement. Long before the current war in Iraq, the
Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which included many high-level
members of the Bush administration, argued for the removal of Saddam
Hussein. However, they said Saddam's leadership in Iraq was simply
the "immediate justification" for establishing a permanent U.S. military
presence in the Gulf region, which could protect American allies and
oil interests there. With continued instability in Iraq likely for
the foreseeable future, it's likely the U.S. will have a permanent
military presence there.

Long
before the American invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. conducted military
exercises in Kazakhstan. This didn't seem to make much sense at the
time, given the barrenness and isolated nature of that region. However,
in 1952 the World Association of Parliamentarians for World Government
developed a map showing what nations would be policing other nations
under a future world government, and it showed American forces would
be in Kazakhstan among other places (e.g., Yugoslavia, etc.). Also,
CFR member and world government proponent Zbigniew Brzezinski in THE
GRAND CHESSBOARD (1997) described the geopolitical importance of the
oil and gas in the Caspian region, and now the U.S. has a military
and economic (e.g., UNOCAL, etc.) presence in many of the nations
there whose names end in "stan" (e.g., Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan,
etc.). In the future, there likely would be wars fought over the dwindling
global supply of oil, but Rhodes' plan sought to avoid such wars by
linking stabilized (by permanent military presence) economic regions
and managing them with a world government.

One
problem for the global planners was how to get Americans to be willing
to live under a world government. Americans believe they live in the
mightiest nation on earth with the highest living standards. Therefore,
the global planners had to devise a "leveling" process, which included
shipping American jobs overseas and making us more vulnerable. Americans'
willingness to purchase cheap goods from China despite the resulting
job losses by their fellow Americans was critically important to this
plan. The resulting trade imbalance with China has allowed that nation
to build its military and financial reserves, which have been used
to purchase American debt. As THE NEW YORK TIMES columnist Thomas
Friedman said on NBC's "Meet the Press" (September 25, 2005), we ought
to call the $200 billion price tag for hurricane Katrina what it really
is, and that's "How much is China willing to lend us?" Friedman correctly
noted that this daily borrowing from China will give that nation tremendous
leverage over us in the future. One might also note here that the
Saudis' leverage over us is that they have about $1 trillion invested
in our stock market and another $1 trillion in U.S. bonds, corporations
and banks.

This
is all part of the globalists' leveling process so that there is no
longer one dominant nation, thereby making the plan for a world government
more likely to succeed, unlike the "failures to plan" mentioned in
Part 1 of this article. There are even public school classes that
will result in the plan's acceptance. For example, a "How to Run the
World" 6th, 7th and 8th grade assignment plan in a Dallas, Texas,
suburb states: "You are the governing council of a new world order.
No longer are there separate countries. The entire globe is under
your guidance and leadership. There is chaos everywhere, because it
as (sic) been a long and arduous process to organize the earth and
it's (sic) people into a workable situation. You currently have pockets
of wealth, but most of your people are extremely poor and hungry.
There is in-fighting among people of different religions and various
races. The new world economy is at an all time low, because there
hasn't been any leadership in this area in a very long time. What
will you do to organize your world into a productive, economically
feasible world where everyone gets to eat healthy food and drink clean
water and earn livings to support their families?"

Also
necessary for the plan's acceptance is a willingness on the part of
the public to accept military action in civilian life, thus eliminating
the protection of Posse Comitatus. In this regard, not only have there
been exercises where the military takes over towns looking for terrorists,
but after the devastation of hurricane Katrina, there is a growing
desire to have the military active in any large-scale civil emergency.
Gun confiscation is usually part of this, which makes a population
easier forcibly to relocate because, if unarmed, they will be at the
mercy of looters and other criminals.

Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!

Enter Your E-Mail Address:

Authoritarian
power at the national level probably will precede a world government,
which will have absolute power. And as Lord Acton warned: "Absolute
power corrupts absolutely."

Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political
analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy
has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic
risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior
Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.

Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress
on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or
edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles
appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post,
Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio
talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York
City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs
USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.