Facebook and Yahoo, have joined Google and Microsoft in addressing the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to legally allow them to make public the data requests received from the NSA as part of the infamous PRISM program.

Microsoft and Google filed motions to the FISA court in August,
but the proceedings were delayed at the US government’s request
to allow time to negotiate. Since then no common ground has been
found between the state and the tech giants.

On Monday, Google updated its request, asking for the company to
be “allowed to publish detailed statistics about the types (if
any) of national security requests we receive under the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act, including Section 702.”
“Given the important public policy issues at stake, we have also
asked the court to hold its hearing in open rather than behind
closed doors. It's time for more transparency," Google’s
director of law enforcement and information security, Richard
Salgado, and the director of public policy and government
affairs, Pablo Chavez, wrote in a blog post.

The company’s stance is that “the levels of secrecy that have
built up around national security requests undermine the basic
freedoms that are at the heart of a democratic society."

Microsoft also amended its petition on September 9 as it earlier
pledged to work with Google in their bid to release Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) request information.

Meanwhile, the battle for transparency was joined by Facebook and
Yahoo!, who also decided to file their claims to the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court.

The US government hasn’t done enough to “adequately
address” the public concerns about “whether their
information is safe and secure with internet companies,” says
Facebook's vice president and general council, Colin
Stretch.

"We believe there’s more information that the public deserves
to know, and that would help foster an informed debate about
whether government security programs adequately balance privacy
interests when attempting to keep the public safe," he
said.

In its petition, Facebook asked to publish the total number of
orders it receives relating to physical searches, business
records and wiretap orders, as well as the total number of users,
who had their messages and other personal content released to the
NSA.

Yahoo filed a petition similar to Google's as the company named
specific FISA orders, on which it wanted to publish more details.

The company says it has been unable to engage fully in the debate
about whether the government has “properly used its
powers”, because it has imposed a restraint on Yahoo's
freedom of speech.

"We believe that the US government's important responsibility
to protect public safety can be carried out without precluding
internet companies from sharing the number of national security
requests they may receive," Ron Bell, general counsel for
Yahoo, Is cited by the Guardian.

"Ultimately, withholding such information breeds mistrust and
suspicion – both of the United States and of companies that must
comply with government legal directives," he added.

Google and Microsoft, Facebook and Yahoo have been allegedly been
involved in giving the National Security Agency access to
customer data under the program known as Prism. The Internet
giants are now determined to correct “false claims” and
reports about what they have provided to the government.

Yahoo spokeswoman Suzanne Philion explained in an e-mail to AP
that "these actions stem from a common interest in ensuring
that we can provide the most accurate information to the public
about the national security requests we receive from the US
government."

In the wake of the first NSA disclosures by the agency’s former
contractor Edward Snowden, lawmakers in the US and abroad have
debated whether or not the secretive surveillance programs, such
as Prism, strike the proper balance between privacy and
security.

President Barack Obama and his administration has made numerous
claims that those operations exist with significant oversight to
prevent any abuses, including constitutional violations, but
other documents released by Snowden in the wake of the first
disclosures have shown that the NSA has accidentally collected
personal correspondence of Americans at least thousands of times
annually.

According to their latest report, the federal government is
spending millions to find a way to keep those companies
collecting data that invades the privacy of those outside the
US.

According to the latest Snowden leak, released earlier this
month, the NSA and its British counterpart have circumvented the
encryption methods used to secure emails, chats and essentially
most Internet traffic that was previously thought to be protected
from prying eyes.

The price tag for such an endeavour, the Guardian reported, is
around a quarter-of-a-billion dollars each year for just the US,
and involves not just intricate code-breaking, but maintaining
partnerships with the tech companies that provide seemingly
secure online communications.

“The files show that the National Security Agency and its UK
counterpart GCHQ have broadly compromised the guarantees that
Internet companies have given consumers to reassure them that
their communications, online banking and medical records would be
indecipherable to criminals or governments,” James Ball,
Julian Borger and Glenn Greenwald reported.

The director of US national intelligence, James Clapper, has
responded by saying the government would simply not be doing its
job if it did not use legally dubious techniques to track down
communications.

“Throughout history, nations have used encryption to protect
their secrets, and today, terrorists, cyber-criminals, human
traffickers and others also use code to hide their
activities,” read the statement issued on September 6.