The point being, there are many softener systems with over a 4,500 grains/lb of salt efficiency. I have even seen a few above the 5,000 grains/lb. It is understood that in theory the maximum salt efficiency is 6,000 grains/lb.

The Dealers in California are supposed to set the systems to specific regeneration efficiencies.

The real problem with this hyper efficiency claims is that as with everything else, nothing is free. You dont get 5000 grains effcieincy without giving up something else. Without going into a long and boring technical training seminar, I will just tell you we are working with a customer that is one of the biggest manufacturers in Europe for the ultra efficient systems. They are working with us right now to try to solve their resin issue. They are having constant resin failures in under a year. Resin in a system that does not get these hyper efficiencies can last for decades. We are trying a few tricks to try to hide the problem, but the problem is ver obvious and not fixable without a major redesign. For now, they are just accepting that 10% of their equipment will have problems in a year.

As to the bleed through issue, water has too many variables to accurately do this. Water with sulfates, chlorides, sodium, etc all have different feels, and no two water supplies are alike. At my house by the beach, my softener maintains less than 10-15 ppm hardness, it feels great. My house in the Inland Empire, the water does not feel soft unless the ppm remains below 5 ppm. That is why the silly blanket absolute statements made on this forum show a persons lack of knowledge. The lack of field experience, and the comments of" ive always done it that way" are comments we here from first week trainees. The people who post on here almost always have excellent questions, and are looking to gain a knowledge and deeper understanding of their equipment so that they can maintain and even adjust their equipment because they bought it over the internet without having a proper water analysis done. This forum has many highly qualified people who all have their specialties. From guys who can rebuild Kineticos or Culligans in the dark, to licensed plumbers who also are very knowledgable of modern water softening equipment, to the technicians like me who work first hand with this equipment everyday for a living.

17 minutes regen time... I dont want to discuss this in a forum. Please send me a pm if you want more detailed information about that design.

Interesting. That's the first time I've ever seen numbers relating to people's perception of water hardness. We have a softener purely by accident -- the (well) water stunk and made the toilets red over time, so I called the neighborhood-recommended guy, he installed the chlorinator-carbon-softener system,and Viola! -- "good" water. I didn't know crap about water softeners either, but I did (and do) know that my treated water was (and is) a hell of a lot better than that which I drank and showered in in homes and fancy hotels around the world. From a drinking standpoint, I prefer it to bottled water. OTOH, we had a fancy DI water system at work, and it was pretty awful to drink, so there's a question of what makes water taste "good"?

But our out-of-the-ground hardness is only about 8-9 gpg. Maybe the only treatment I need is chlorination-carbon? I'll bet that in the general population, if you show someone the result of an expensive water test and it showed 5 gpg, he'd happily purchase a softener system without knowing whether he really needed it or not. I'm going to start carrying my Hach kit around with me now when I travel and see what's what.

So now I'm wondering if there's an absolute hardness level that really needs to be treated -- at what hardness level are your plumbing and fixtures adversely affected? I'm tempted to put the softener in bypass for a while and see if She Who Must be Obeyed notices the difference. And, can/should a system be designed to bring the hardness down to a specific level? I'm up to page 82 in the 1st WQA book and so far it's all theory without discussing human perception. I guess the ultimate salt efficiency is that in a system which softens only to the point really needed, whatever that might be.

This article explains the need for soft water, even at low levels. The other problem that is not understood well is the "slimy / Silky" water issue. Anyone who had braces gets it fairly well with this analogy.

When you had your braces removed, your teeth felt "slimy". In rality, they felt proper, but your brain is trained to the way it used to feel with the braces. Soft water is the same way, you are used to the soap curd giving you a "squeaky clean" feel, when in reality, it is the soap curd giving you that improper perception of clean.

BTW, great book huh? Lots of information. The first test is the hardest to pass, after that, the higher levels are easy. (compared to the first)

Softness can be adjusted, and in many countries it is reguired. If you look at most control valves, you can see where they are molded for more "stuff". The 7000, 5600, etc, can all accomodate hardness bleeders for Europe. In the US, it is not required, and in my opinion, not desired.

Interesting. That's the first time I've ever seen numbers relating to people's perception of water hardness. We have a softener purely by accident -- the (well) water stunk and made the toilets red over time, so I called the neighborhood-recommended guy, he installed the chlorinator-carbon-softener system,and Viola! -- "good" water. I didn't know crap about water softeners either, but I did (and do) know that my treated water was (and is) a hell of a lot better than that which I drank and showered in in homes and fancy hotels around the world. From a drinking standpoint, I prefer it to bottled water. OTOH, we had a fancy DI water system at work, and it was pretty awful to drink, so there's a question of what makes water taste "good"?

But our out-of-the-ground hardness is only about 8-9 gpg. Maybe the only treatment I need is chlorination-carbon? I'll bet that in the general population, if you show someone the result of an expensive water test and it showed 5 gpg, he'd happily purchase a softener system without knowing whether he really needed it or not. I'm going to start carrying my Hach kit around with me now when I travel and see what's what.

So now I'm wondering if there's an absolute hardness level that really needs to be treated -- at what hardness level are your plumbing and fixtures adversely affected? I'm tempted to put the softener in bypass for a while and see if She Who Must be Obeyed notices the difference. And, can/should a system be designed to bring the hardness down to a specific level? I'm up to page 82 in the 1st WQA book and so far it's all theory without discussing human perception. I guess the ultimate salt efficiency is that in a system which softens only to the point really needed, whatever that might be.

Click to expand...

Honest softener sales people and dealers don't fudge test results and will suggest a softener if the person has 3 or more gpg of hardness. 3-4 gpg is sufficient to cause scale problems and increase water heating costs and cause premature replacement of water heaters and some fixtures but most all water using appliances. In other words, a softener will cost less to purchase and feed salt and maintain than the damage caused by hard water. Which includes all things washed with or laundered in hard water and cause the use of more detergent, soap and cleansers to be used while clothes and other fabrics are worn out much quicker than they would be in softened water, or naturally soft water.

The point being, there are many softener systems with over a 4,500 grains/lb of salt efficiency. I have even seen a few above the 5,000 grains/lb. It is understood that in theory the maximum salt efficiency is 6,000 grains/lb.

Acheiving that high of efficiency is not difficult, but there are considerable design issues that arise from doing this. Way too much typing to do in a forum of this type. I go over these topics during some of my longer training seminars. This particualr topic is typically a "filler" so as to extend the training seminars beyond their normal length. In all reality, acheiving 4000 grains is exceptionally efficient, especially considering the ROI for getting past 4K starts to get difficult to justify.