When Jeanne started out her exercise class business, she decided after taking advice that she didn’t sign up for VALUE-ADDED TAX. It makes sense. In the event that you want to contend with everyone else then weight loss charge even just the teens higher prices to include VAT. But now she actually is stuck. She can’t expand the business beyond the VAT threshold because the girl would have to increase her prices or take a significant lowering of border. Now she’s contemplating placing up separate businesses to improve her earnings. It’s quickly going to get complicated – she can do without all the frenzymadness, desperation, hysteria, mania, insanity, delirium, derangement of doubling the webmaster work.

Five years in to running his frizzy hair salon, Scott needs a day off a week and shuts early some days and nights only to limit his takings to keep them below the VAT threshold. Although he’s living hand-to-mouth.

Which in turn came first during these two cases: tax strategy or business strategy? The payoff of course is the fact both businesses reduce their tax expenses, but at what cost?

I’m sure this isn’t very the thing that was intended when a VAT registration threshold was included in the VALUE-ADDED TAX legislation created in 1973.

Income Tax

John operates a sole-tradership and takes in money from the business as he needs it and, more importantly, if it’s available during the year. His accountant then finds the most taxes efficient way at the year-end to distribute his drawings between salary, expenditures and dividends. Cashflow is not managed proactively, so while John knows precisely in the bank this individual doesn’t keep track of every due payment or receipt so he sometimes draws too much and leaves the business enterprise short of cash. This regularly triggers him to have night times without sleep.

Norman operates a limited company and runs it not much different from the way. This individual takes no salary as such and reinvests almost all of the profits into the business to finance progress. He restricts his paintings to pay very little tax as possible. She has planning to exit the business in 3-5 years. However, because he’s not taking any sort of salary, let by itself a market rate salary, he has no idea how profitable the business truly is and is complicating things for him or her self when he eventually come to sell.

Ken is looking to buy a new vehicle for his business, that he can use personally too, to be able to reduce his tax invoice. Nevertheless , his tax financial savings are much less than savings he’ll make obtaining a vehicle this way compared to some of the alternatives.

Which emerged first in these occasions – business strategy or tax strategy? Again, the payoff is a lower goverment tax bill, but at what cost in conditions of business expansion and equity?

These cases are not rare. A large number of micro-businesses and SMEs are operated in a way that minimises tax financial obligations. Their business strategy is defined by their duty strategy. In the real world, it appears, tax strategy more often takes concern over business strategy.

And in every case defined it is stunting the expansion potential of the business. That will be OK in some cases, where the owner doesn’t want to grow. However, where they do it is having them back. In any case, all businesses should be looking to increase at least a little just to overcome the effects of inflation!