Explainer: How to reject physician-assisted suicide

The movement to legalize assisted suicide has been growing in slow but measurable acceptability in the United States. This year, the District of Columbia joined Oregon, Montana, Washington and Vermont in legalizing the practice. The federal government has oversight of governing decisions of the District, but such oversight is rarely used.

In response to the new D.C. law, members of Congress proposed resolutions of disapproval in the House and Senate, respectively. The Senate failed to take up the measure within the 30 day period allotted to respond to new D.C. laws. One Senator told the ERLC that, in conversations with Senate colleagues, even pro-life Republican senators reacted with indifference when asked their position on physician-assisted suicide.

How would you respond to the question?

The following is not a comprehensive explanation on physician-assisted suicide, but here are some of the simple, primary objections to the practice.

Pro-life citizens affirm the dignity of human life from womb to tomb. The pro-life movement affirms the inherent dignity of human beings from the moment of fertilization to natural death and everywhere in between. This compels our advocacy on behalf of vulnerable human beings, including those approaching the end of life. (Gen. 1:26-30, 2:7, 9:6)

Physicians ought not be complicit in a patient’s suicide. Southern Baptists provide the following compassionate and ethical recommendations.

We commend medical science in its efforts to improve pain management techniques, thus removing one major impetus toward assisted suicide.

We call upon physicians, nurses, hospice workers, individual Christians and local churches to prioritize emotional, psychological and spiritual care of suffering patients, thereby relieving feelings of isolation and abandonment.

We call upon federal, state and local governments to prosecute under the law physicians or others who practice assisted suicide.

Don’t be deceived by euphemisms. “Death with dignity.” “Physician-assisted.” “Medical aid in dying.” Assisting suicide is to be complicit in taking life. The practice of medicine is and ought to be about healing.

Special thanks to C. Ben Mitchell for his writing in this field and his guidance to helpful resources. Dr. Mitchell is Graves Professor of Moral Philosophy at Union University and editor of Ethics & Medicine: An International Journal of Bioethics.

Related Resources

The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) recently filed a brief at the Supreme Court of the United States in this year’s landmark pro-life case, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of California,...
Continue...

Imagine you're a pastor of a church, and a young, godly couple in your congregation comes to you after a prolonged season of infertility seeking your counsel on whether to pursue IVF (In Vitro Fertilization). What counsel would you offer...
Continue...

“Cecile Richards’ leadership at Planned Parenthood was unique because of the high profile, media-savvy nature of her presence. Her presidency coincided with a turn in the abortion rights movement toward a much more aggressive stance toward dissidence,” said Russell Moore,...
Continue...