EV registrations a drop in the ocean as EU’s transport sector emissions on the rise

According to a new report by the EEA, the winner of the diesel emissions scandal is the petrol powered car. Governments and the industry have yet to facilitate a serious increase in EV registrations, as their share still languishes at less than 1%.

In one EV charging business model, followed by Tesla in Germany, the gas station operator simply collects rent in exchange for making a certain area available for the EV manufacturer to install and operate charging infrastructure.

Image: Tesla

Share

A new report from the European Environmental Agency (EEA), named TERM 2018 – Transport and Environment Reporting Mechanism report, paints a sober picture of the EU transport sector’s performance in reducing its impact on the climate.

Indeed, the report suggests emissions resulting from the personal transport sector are on the rise. Specifically, it says they have been growing since 2014, while in 2016 and 2017, they reached a point where they were 26% and 28% higher, respectively, relative to 1990. A dent in emissions prior to 2014 has been connected to rising fuel costs as a result of an oil crisis, as well as the economic crisis that hit the EU and reduced overall mobility.

In light of the diesel emissions scandal, petrol cars have experienced a serious uptake in new registrations, with 53% of the total share, thus overtaking diesel for the first time since the annual report was published in 2010.

Furthermore, diesel fuel comprised 67% of the total fuel sold for road transport use in 2016, says the report. Also for the first time since 2010, the average CO2 emissions of new passenger cars increased, by 0.4%, in 2017. The sector relies heavily on oil-derived fuels, as they continue to account for 95% of final energy consumption in transport.

Missed targets

The EU set itself a 10% renewable energy utilization target by 2020 for the transport sector in its Renewable Energy Directive (2009/38/EC). This is likely to be missed, as progress between 2016 and 2017 was just 0.1%. The report’s authors identify Austria and Sweden as the only EU member states to have already surpassed the 10% target.

If the EU were serious about its climate goals, EVs would have been a good option, the report finds. While EVs have higher emissions resulting from their production process, their overall life-cycle emissions are about 17-30% lower than the emissions of petrol and diesel cars.

Additionally, bearing in mind the current carbon intensity trajectory of the EU’s energy mix, this rate is bound to fall to 73% lower emissions by 2050. However, the report also highlights that if BEVs are charged with electricity generated purely from coal, their lifetime emissions would, in fact, be higher than those of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Life-cycle emissions from BEV’s entirely powered using renewable energy resources are estimated to be 90% less compared to ICEVs.

Underperformance

The slow adoption rate and underperformance on climate goals has caused an unlikely feud between Germany’s car industry and its otherwise industry-friendly conservative politicians from the country’s CSU and CDU parties, with German Transport Minister Andreas Scheuer, CSU, lashing out against Volkswagen CEO Herbert Diess. In an interview with a German tabloid newspaper, the CEO claimed that the car industry had never received any help from politics to accelerate EV adoption.

In response, Scheuer ordered his ministry to tally up the bill, which amounted to €5.2 billion since 2009. The minister then asked Germany’s car industry why there are not any EVs on the roads. More criticism came from German Economy Minister Peter Altmaier, who asked why German car manufacturers are not making EVs that are even half as “sexy” as Tesla’s.

Currently, German car manufacturers have 30 EV models in their product portfolios. However, waiting lists are prohibitively long. According to recent reports, customers often have to wait more than a year for their new car. Additionally, the development of comprehensive charging infrastructure is a significant drag on demand, still putting off many buyers.

Share

Marian Willuhn

Covering news on power electronics, start-ups, and inverters, Marian writes for pv magazine’s International, Australian, and German online presences. He also edits the international print magazine and organizes webinars and events.

Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

1 comment

“However, the report also highlights that if BEVs are charged with electricity generated purely from coal, their lifetime emissions would, in fact, be higher than those of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs).” Why does the EEA waste time with this silly counterfactual? EVs are the only game in town for cutting CO2, particulate and NOX emissions from transport. They are already much better than ICEVs on all three counts, and the advantage in CO2 will accelerate.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Keep up to date

pv magazine Global offers daily updates of the latest photovoltaics news. We also offer comprehensive global coverage of the most important solar markets worldwide. Select one or more editions for targeted, up to date information delivered straight to your inbox.

Email*

Select Edition(s)*

Hold Ctrl or Cmd to select multiple editions.

We send newsletters with the approximate frequency outlined for each edition above, with occasional additional notifications about events and webinars. We measure how often our emails are opened, and which links our readers click. To provide a secure and reliable service, we send our email with MailChimp, which means we store email addresses and analytical data on their servers. You can opt out of our newsletters at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of every mail. For more information please see our Data Protection Policy.

Keep up to date

We send newsletters with the approximate frequency outlined for each edition above, with occasional additional notifications about events and webinars. We measure how often our emails are opened, and which links our readers click. To provide a secure and reliable service, we send our email with MailChimp, which means we store email addresses and analytical data on their servers. You can opt out of our newsletters at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of every mail. For more information please see our Data Protection Policy.

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.