If ever there were a time for a wake up call within the rank and file
of the Republican Party, it is here and now. Surely, there is a gnawing
feeling emerging that the party falls woefully short of offering a legitimate
and principled alternative.

And the proof is in the pudding: a continued policy of budget compromises,
a Contract With America which promised a return to "the brilliance
and wisdom of the founders" but delivered further centralization,
and a weak sistered, skip-the-real-issues, embrace- the-scandals centered
impeachment, have collectively and conspicuously confirmed the long held
suspicion that the Grand Old Party is not so grand after all.

Supporting evidence, in fact, lies all around us. Consider the continued
Republican Party's Holy Grail quest for taxpayer funded education vouchers,
a cause they have fought for, at least since the days of Richard Nixon,
which uses tax dollars to pay parents to send their children to private
rather than public schools.

One can readily empathize with their motives. Pure and simple, the public
school system is a rotten carcus and parents are desperate. Privatization,
therefore, is the answer, and school vouchers, it seems, the method. And
its supporters do have more than a few good reasons to suppose that this
is the preferred route.

First there is the free choice argument. Truly free societies do not
mandate and protect a self perpetuating monopoly of state education, via
taxation, compulsory attendance laws, and state licensure of all educators
public and private. Nor do they strip the natural right of parents to
decide where, when, and how, their child will be educated. They realize
checks upon free markets and natural rights, in the realm of education,
are a key to fulfilling Marx's dream for a well ordered totalitarian community,
but no boon at all to free speech, free thinking, and excellence in education.

Wisdom, they say, dictates an abandonment of schools for socialism in
favor of schools for liberty, and privatization is the great key. Yet,
realists work for change by degrees. They understand that the swift abolition
of the state school system is politicallyunattainable, if it is, at this
late date, attainable at all. The school voucher becomes their safe middle
ground, simply giving disenchanted parents the right to reclaim their
cash and their child from the state and its sub-inferior education, and
to invest them both, in a far-superior private education. Reasonable?
So it seems.

Second, there is the free market argument. Let the public schools, like
every good or service in the private sector, compete for dollars, and
then marvel at how much more efficient they become, how much more customer
oriented, how soon they are rescued from the dull mediocrity of statism
to the sharp high flying achievement of privateenterprise. Placing a government
voucher in the hands of parents to invest in the education of their choice
will turn the focus of administrators and teachers to satisfying their
customer, not the state. Reasonable? So it seems.

Third, there is the virtuous republic argument. It declares, as did founder
John Adams, that "our Constitution was made for a moral and religious
people only," and "is wholly inadequate for the government of
any other." Yet, public schools, aided by Supreme Court decisions
which inverted freedom of religion into freedom from religion, firstoutlawed
and then became hostile to those two things which most support liberty.
The result of such a policy produces as Ben Franklin warned, "[a]
people...corrupted in their manners...[who] require more masters,"
and that's the point.

School vouchers then, by enabling tens of millions of parents to send
their kids to schools where academic studies are balanced with moral perspective,
will help raise up future generations where morality matters, where certain
broad laws and rights become fixed as eternal verities, and where liberty
is then given better odds for a long and prosperous future. Again reasonable?
Certainly.

Fourth, there is the practical argument. Many state school systems are
grappling with problems of growth. The school voucher provides an escape
valve for the mounting pressure of student enrollment and bond issue battles.
Reasonable? Sure.

Fifth, there is Milton Friedman's equality of outcomes argument. Prosperous
whites, he insisted, have long had the option of sending their children
to superior private schools. Why then should not inner city minority parents
have the same option? A private school system whose ticket price excludes
the poor, he said, is a source today for further class and race stratification
in society. The answer again - school vouchers. School vouchers, gives
each person, including the black gifted student, an equal right to attend
superior schools. Reasonable? From his perspective, yes.

Indeed, all five arguments stand to reason, however, they unravel in
the face of one very fundamental flaw - their sidestepping of the law
of subsidy. The Supreme Court, as far back as Everson v. Board of Education
in 1947, in a similar case of indirect aid to private schools, cautioned,
"if the state may aid these religious schools, it may therefore regulate
them."

It's a very simple principle. Subsidies, whether direct or indirect equal
control, and will by and by wrap their attractive coils around careless
recipients, until the circle is complete, and the liberty destroying squeeze
begins.

As a veteran, for instance, my VA education benefit was denied because
I chose to attend an exclusive private religious school which was not
on the VA's list of "approved" schools. So much for blindly
believing that indirect educational aid will not prescribe rules on the
private sector and freedom of choice.

This schools sin was that it wisely refused to participate in federal
and state financial aid programs, lest curriculum controls follow. For
which they should be commended. But very few private schools, religious
or otherwise, have shown a similar will to resist the cash flow. In turn,
many have found themselves compromising their values and independence
as the government has mandated hiring practices, co-ed dormitories, and
watered down curriculums stripped of religion and patriotism.

That's why Marx, certainly nobody's dummy, included in his ten plank
plan to undermine the most advanced capitalist nations - "free education."
That is government paid for and thus government controlled education.
School vouchers, in this sense, are nothing less than Marx's plan for
"free education" going after the last remnants of truly free
education. Further, school vouchers provide yet another avenue for the
spread and legitimization of Marx's forced redistribution of the wealth.

Promoting "private" schools via socialist subsidies, block
grants, and forced wealth redistribution reminds us of the stealthful
hypocrisy of the Republican Party; a party which preaches like the founders
but practices like the Fabians. Their penchant for putting forth proposals
to cure socialism with socialism, while pretending that theirs is the
free market plan, is clear evidence that they are not a legitimate alternative
to the Democratic Party, but very possibly, a Trojan Horse.

Next up: Steve Farrell examines the GOP's penchant for saying yes
to the United Nations, in part 3 of his series "Democrats In Drag."

Steve Farrell is the former managing editor of Right Magazine and
a new member of the staff at Newsmax.com. This is a modified version of
a piece first published in ESR in April 1999.