New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark's Labour Government has followed her orders from, Roman Catholic inspired, Crusader E.U. legislators and opened the doors to Third World Arab Muslim immigrants in order to help Rome rid New Zealand of British Protestantism, and Muslims aren't wasting any time flooding into "God's Own" in their thousands. What can New Zealand learn from other Western nations who have been fooled by Rome's E.U. propaganda and legislation?

Following the 911 attacks, Rome's alter boys, the White House, for tactical reasons stated in the media that "our fight is only with terrorists, not Muslims". But we must face the fact that while the Muslim prophet has moderate followers (Muslim back-sliders), the terrorists (true followers of the Quran) command great sympathy in the Islamic world not only because Islamic populations are anti-American or anti-Western, but also because the terrorists are attacking infidels (non Muslims, Jew and Chrsitians). An elderly Afghan Muslim freed from detention at Guantanamo made a telling statement to a Washington Post reporter: "The Americans treated me well, but they were not Muslims, so I didn't like them."

Islamic violence currently erupting all over the world is aimed not simply at the political and economic leadership of the West but also at Jews and Christians, who are characterized as Kuffr. While most new Muslim immigrants to New Zealand appear mild mannered, once the surface has been scratched their hatred of Jews and Christians (the Christians they refer to are in fact Roman Catholics Crusaders etc) and love of so-called "freedom fighters" (as a group of Muslim youth put it to a Street Preacher in Auckland's Queen recently) such as Osama Ben Laden should be enough to have any right think New Zealander on the phone to his or her local PM. What does the future hold for New Zealand as we once knew it? Will New Zealand's Jewish and Christian citizens be safe in "God's own" in future? Not if Denmark is anything to go by.

In August 2002 a report by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedgegaard from the New York Times was headed "Something Rotten in Denmark?" The article tells how a Muslim group in Denmark announced that a $US30,000 bounty would be paid for the murder of several prominent Danish Jews, a threat that garnered wide international notice. Less well known is that this is just one problem associated with Denmark's approximately 200,000 Muslim immigrants (2002 figures). The key issue is that many of them show little desire to fit into their adopted country.

For years, Danes lauded multiculturalism and insisted they had no problem with the Muslim customs - until one day they found that they did. Perhaps Prime Minister Clark could take note and learn from the mistakes Denmark has made by allowing large volumes of Muslim immigrants in the gates.

So what are the major issues?

Living on the dole: Third-world immigrants - most of them Muslims from countries such as Turkey, Somalia, Pakistan, Lebanon and Iraq - constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.

Engaging in crime: Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes. Author Ramon Bennett in his book 'Philistine, the Great Deception', says because sexual restraint is practiced among young Muslim women there is an unavailability of willing girls with which to satisfy a young man's high urge for sex. This could will account for their victims being non-Muslim. Bennett also states that in Arab (Muslim) countries this accounts for the extremely high rate of homosexuality among men. He goes on to quote Patai, The Arab Mind, saying, the active homosexual act is considered to be an "assertion of one's aggressive masculine superiority..." (Is this what we want here in New Zealand?)

Self-imposed isolation: Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey found that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.

Importing unacceptable customs: Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem.

Another is threats to kill Muslims who convert out of Islam. One Kurdish convert to Christianity, who went public to explain why she had changed religion, felt the need to hide her face and conceal her identity, fearing for her life.

Fomenting anti-Semitism: Muslim violence threatens Denmark's approximately 6,000 Jews, who increasingly depend on police protection. Jewish parents were told by one school principal that she could not guarantee their children's safety and were advised to attend another institution. Anti-Israel marches have turned into anti-Jewish riots. One organization, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, openly calls on Muslims to "kill all Jews . . . wherever you find them."

Seeking Islamic law: Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.

Other Europeans (such as the late Pim Fortuyn in Holland) have also grown alarmed about these issues, but Danes were the first to make them the basis for a change in government.

In the recent momentous election in Denmark, a center-right coalition came to power that - for the first time since 1929 - excluded the socialists. The right broke its 72-year losing streak and won a solid parliamentary majority by promising to handle immigration issues, the electorate's first concern, differently from the socialists.

The next nine months did witness some fine-tuning of procedures: Immigrants now must live seven years in Denmark (rather than three) to become permanent residents. Most non-refugees no longer can collect welfare checks immediately on entering the country. No one can bring into the country an intended spouse under the age of 24. And the state prosecutor is considering a ban on Hizb-ut-Tahrir for its death threats against Jews.

These minor adjustments prompted howls internationally - with European and U.N. reports condemning Denmark for racism and "Islamophobia," the Washington Post reporting that Muslim immigrants "face habitual discrimination," and a London Guardian headline announcing that "Copenhagen Flirts with Fascism."

In reality, however, the new government barely addressed the existing problems. Nor did it prevent new ones, such as the death threats against Jews or a recent Islamic edict calling on Muslims to drive Danes out of the Norrebro quarter of Copenhagen.

The authorities remain indulgent. The military mulls permitting Muslim soldiers in Denmark's volunteer International Brigade to opt out of actions they don't agree with - a privilege granted to members of no other faith. Mohammed Omar Bakri, the self-proclaimed London-based "eyes, ears and mouth" of Osama bin Laden, won permission to set up a branch of his organization, Al-Muhajiroun.

Contrary to media reports, the real news from Denmark is not flirting with fascism but getting mired in inertia. A government elected specifically to deal with a set of problems has made minimal headway. Its reluctance has potentially profound implications for the West as a whole.

Will New Zealand's Labour Government learn from Denmark's Islamic immigration woes?

Don't let any E.U. inspired Government destroy our beautiful country from within.