PI4K inhibitor

Rall response rate of this study (4.1 ) was relatively poor, but believed to stem from the concern over theTable 5. Univariate analysis of categorical biosecurity variables (P#0.25).Variable Diarrhea Location Pest control WaterfowlDescription Reported within past 6 mo. North vs. other regions Implemented pest control Exposed to wild waterfowlPrevalence Ratio 2.84 2.80 2.50 3.95 Confidence Interval 0.939?.596 0.672?1.670 0.601?0.394 1.116?.P-value 0.075 0.122 0.165 0.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056851.tBiosecurity in Maryland Backyard PoultryTable 6. Multivariate logistic regression (P#0.25).Table 7. Backward Homatropine methobromide site selection stepwise logistic regression model to examine association between biosecurity risk factors and AI seroprevalence (P#0.05).0.133 0.104 0.380 0.204 0.942 0.736 Time owned Visit comm. Location How many years kept poultry How often visit commercial sites North vs. other 23727046 regions 0.154 0.713 2.379 0.127 0.080 0.Variable Time owned Visit comm. Diarrhea Location Pest control WaterfowlDescription How many years kept poultry How often visit commercial sites Reported within past 6 mo. North vs. other regions Implemented pest control Exposed to wild waterfowlCoefficient P-value 0.613 2.701 21.314 2.500 20.107 18.377 Variable Description Coefficient P-valuedoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056851.tdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056851.tmandatory reporting of flock positives to the State Veterinarian and potential repercussions, such as “Hold Orders” that restrict the CI 1011 web movement of birds onto or off the premises, as well as the stigma attached to having an infectious disease. A larger sample size may have also increased the ability of this study to detect significant associations between biosecurity risk factors and disease prevalence. While association could be hypothesized based on proportional analysis, wide confidence intervals indicate that these estimates have low precision from an inadequate sample size and therefore associated risk results should be interpreted cautiously in this preliminary study. Although methods of convenience sampling are often assumed to be representative of a population, sampling biases (most notably selection bias) do occur, making it difficult to develop statistically valid estimates of disease prevalence, regardless of how many birds are sampled. Another constraint was the lack of detail collected in the wild bird-domestic poultry interface such as type of wild bird/waterfowl species identified on the property as well as the means of exposure (i.e. nose to nose, adjacent habitat, droppings only) which may have provided greater insight to the exposure risk and should be included in future studies. Widening the sample collection time frame from May to October could have improved the chances of obtaining a more representative data set in relation to the transmission of AI from wild birds to poultry. This study was also limited to a population of backyard flock owners that had registered with the MDA. It is believed that AI prevalence estimates reported in this study are lower than the true population as most owners with clinically ill birds would be reluctant to participate. Due to the low response rate and potential biases, this study cannot be generalized to other backyard flock populations. Surveillance is a dynamic process that requires continuous observation, collection, and analysis of data in order to identify thepresence of a disease and contain its spread. While migratory waterfowl have been the main target of.Rall response rate of this study (4.1 ) was relatively poor, but believed to stem from the concern over theTable 5. Univariate analysis of categorical biosecurity variables (P#0.25).Variable Diarrhea Location Pest control WaterfowlDescription Reported within past 6 mo. North vs. other regions Implemented pest control Exposed to wild waterfowlPrevalence Ratio 2.84 2.80 2.50 3.95 Confidence Interval 0.939?.596 0.672?1.670 0.601?0.394 1.116?.P-value 0.075 0.122 0.165 0.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056851.tBiosecurity in Maryland Backyard PoultryTable 6. Multivariate logistic regression (P#0.25).Table 7. Backward selection stepwise logistic regression model to examine association between biosecurity risk factors and AI seroprevalence (P#0.05).0.133 0.104 0.380 0.204 0.942 0.736 Time owned Visit comm. Location How many years kept poultry How often visit commercial sites North vs. other 23727046 regions 0.154 0.713 2.379 0.127 0.080 0.Variable Time owned Visit comm. Diarrhea Location Pest control WaterfowlDescription How many years kept poultry How often visit commercial sites Reported within past 6 mo. North vs. other regions Implemented pest control Exposed to wild waterfowlCoefficient P-value 0.613 2.701 21.314 2.500 20.107 18.377 Variable Description Coefficient P-valuedoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056851.tdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056851.tmandatory reporting of flock positives to the State Veterinarian and potential repercussions, such as “Hold Orders” that restrict the movement of birds onto or off the premises, as well as the stigma attached to having an infectious disease. A larger sample size may have also increased the ability of this study to detect significant associations between biosecurity risk factors and disease prevalence. While association could be hypothesized based on proportional analysis, wide confidence intervals indicate that these estimates have low precision from an inadequate sample size and therefore associated risk results should be interpreted cautiously in this preliminary study. Although methods of convenience sampling are often assumed to be representative of a population, sampling biases (most notably selection bias) do occur, making it difficult to develop statistically valid estimates of disease prevalence, regardless of how many birds are sampled. Another constraint was the lack of detail collected in the wild bird-domestic poultry interface such as type of wild bird/waterfowl species identified on the property as well as the means of exposure (i.e. nose to nose, adjacent habitat, droppings only) which may have provided greater insight to the exposure risk and should be included in future studies. Widening the sample collection time frame from May to October could have improved the chances of obtaining a more representative data set in relation to the transmission of AI from wild birds to poultry. This study was also limited to a population of backyard flock owners that had registered with the MDA. It is believed that AI prevalence estimates reported in this study are lower than the true population as most owners with clinically ill birds would be reluctant to participate. Due to the low response rate and potential biases, this study cannot be generalized to other backyard flock populations. Surveillance is a dynamic process that requires continuous observation, collection, and analysis of data in order to identify thepresence of a disease and contain its spread. While migratory waterfowl have been the main target of.