Greetings:
I know that I would like to see this additional information in the
RelationshipView!
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Gerald Britton
<gerald.britton@...>wrote:
> Try not to limit it to divorce. Think of all marriage-terminating
> events (including annullment of course, but what about the death of a
> spouse?)
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Nick Hall <nick__hall@...> wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > This sounds like a good idea and I think that it stands a good chance of
> > being included in version 3.3.
> >
> > The gramps32 branch is normally for bug fixes only, not for new features.
> >
> > I think that the best way to progress this would be to create a feature
> > request on the bug tracker and attach a patch against trunk to it.
> >
> > Did you get anywhere with your proposal to add divorce information to
> > the descendant report?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Nick.
> >
> >
> > Paul Franklin wrote:
> >> Yes, I understand what you are saying. I realize that is the
> >> case, technically. On the other hand, since gramps32 and trunk
> >> are identical at the moment, for relview.py as I said, I could
> >> argue that changing one would have the same effect as both.
> >> Especially since the code I posted has the default as off. And
> >> especially if some knowledgeable developer looks it over first.
> >>
> >> But of course, you can always change your personal version,
> >> just like I did. It's just a pain to put my personal fixes into each
> >> new gramps release as it comes out, 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3.
> >> I'd certainly like it if some developer -- I can't -- would put them
> >> into both and I could forget about adding it each time.
> >>
> >> p.s. You didn't copy the list. Perhaps it was intentional. Perhaps
> >> it was a mistake like the one I made earlier today, when I copied
> >> the wrong list. (Sorry!) At any rate, to further discussion, here it
> is.
> >>
> >> On 7/18/10, Rob Healey <robhealey1@...> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear Paul and anyone else:
> >>>
> >>> I would love to see this added to gramps trunk not gramps32. Gramps32
> has
> >>> gone into maintenance mode so there will not be any new features added
> to
> >>> it...
> >>>
> >>> If I am incorrect on this one, then I apologize! I would love to see
> this
> >>> one added!
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely yours,
> >>> Rob G. Healey
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> >> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> >> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gramps-devel mailing list
> >> Gramps-devel@...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gramps-devel mailing list
> > Gramps-devel@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gerald Britton
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-devel mailing list
> Gramps-devel@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
>

Try not to limit it to divorce. Think of all marriage-terminating
events (including annullment of course, but what about the death of a
spouse?)
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Nick Hall <nick__hall@...> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> This sounds like a good idea and I think that it stands a good chance of
> being included in version 3.3.
>
> The gramps32 branch is normally for bug fixes only, not for new features.
>
> I think that the best way to progress this would be to create a feature
> request on the bug tracker and attach a patch against trunk to it.
>
> Did you get anywhere with your proposal to add divorce information to
> the descendant report?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Nick.
>
>
> Paul Franklin wrote:
>> Yes, I understand what you are saying. I realize that is the
>> case, technically. On the other hand, since gramps32 and trunk
>> are identical at the moment, for relview.py as I said, I could
>> argue that changing one would have the same effect as both.
>> Especially since the code I posted has the default as off. And
>> especially if some knowledgeable developer looks it over first.
>>
>> But of course, you can always change your personal version,
>> just like I did. It's just a pain to put my personal fixes into each
>> new gramps release as it comes out, 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3.
>> I'd certainly like it if some developer -- I can't -- would put them
>> into both and I could forget about adding it each time.
>>
>> p.s. You didn't copy the list. Perhaps it was intentional. Perhaps
>> it was a mistake like the one I made earlier today, when I copied
>> the wrong list. (Sorry!) At any rate, to further discussion, here it is.
>>
>> On 7/18/10, Rob Healey <robhealey1@...> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Paul and anyone else:
>>>
>>> I would love to see this added to gramps trunk not gramps32. Gramps32 has
>>> gone into maintenance mode so there will not be any new features added to
>>> it...
>>>
>>> If I am incorrect on this one, then I apologize! I would love to see this
>>> one added!
>>>
>>> Sincerely yours,
>>> Rob G. Healey
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
>> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
>> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gramps-devel mailing list
>> Gramps-devel@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-devel mailing list
> Gramps-devel@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
>
--
Gerald Britton

Paul,
This sounds like a good idea and I think that it stands a good chance of
being included in version 3.3.
The gramps32 branch is normally for bug fixes only, not for new features.
I think that the best way to progress this would be to create a feature
request on the bug tracker and attach a patch against trunk to it.
Did you get anywhere with your proposal to add divorce information to
the descendant report?
Regards,
Nick.
Paul Franklin wrote:
> Yes, I understand what you are saying. I realize that is the
> case, technically. On the other hand, since gramps32 and trunk
> are identical at the moment, for relview.py as I said, I could
> argue that changing one would have the same effect as both.
> Especially since the code I posted has the default as off. And
> especially if some knowledgeable developer looks it over first.
>
> But of course, you can always change your personal version,
> just like I did. It's just a pain to put my personal fixes into each
> new gramps release as it comes out, 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3.
> I'd certainly like it if some developer -- I can't -- would put them
> into both and I could forget about adding it each time.
>
> p.s. You didn't copy the list. Perhaps it was intentional. Perhaps
> it was a mistake like the one I made earlier today, when I copied
> the wrong list. (Sorry!) At any rate, to further discussion, here it is.
>
> On 7/18/10, Rob Healey <robhealey1@...> wrote:
>
>> Dear Paul and anyone else:
>>
>> I would love to see this added to gramps trunk not gramps32. Gramps32 has
>> gone into maintenance mode so there will not be any new features added to
>> it...
>>
>> If I am incorrect on this one, then I apologize! I would love to see this
>> one added!
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Rob G. Healey
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-devel mailing list
> Gramps-devel@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
>
>
>

Community

Help

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

I agree to receive quotes, newsletters and other information from sourceforge.net and its partners regarding IT services and products. I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time. Please refer to our Privacy Policy or Contact Us for more details